The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1981/05/27 - Agenda Packet� y,, � t� r 'k I I � i � ,�, lu �, �' r � 1 ,' I � I � � I �� j l � ti �� l � �I � �� ' r I r I I - _ r L. mil{ � 1�YI II. �" '� 4 � � �. � I'� r I p I I : J 'all �I P � � II j 1 I� �� '• � �r w r ( � I �� r �I Il�il rI "�,�� rI / C � Yy! r .� I � � 'i l I. � r %�4 .✓1 � �:I � li ii/��I �� I'�' � ^�.r —a.�Pl I • II '. 'V I r �. I j r` I.. :t .) I I��II�,�� d �i � �II I .. I �I I? � I h � � I ^� �:. I � I ♦ I � � I I�Ir.q ..�hfl I � � If � % � r I,�.. ly '��' h�`i � '1. �. -, '�',: ' 'a .i i.' =' �' ,.. ACTION 1. II Jeff Sceranka was appointed to Re- development Con- ' sultant Committee. 5 -0 -0 III __�s CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIv10NGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA WEDNESDAY MAY 27, 1981 7;00 P.M. LION'S PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE,-RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Commissioner Dahl X Commissioner Rempel X (Ommissioner King X Commissioner Tolstoy —ir- C)mmissioner Sceranka X Approval of Minutes IV. Announcements V- Consent Calendar The following consent calendar items are expected to be routine and non- controversial_ They will be acted upon by the Commission,at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, then it should be reproved for discussion. A. REQUEST FOR TIME EXTENSION FOR SI1'r APPROVAL N0. 80. BILL WYCKOFF - The development of a pre - school to be ocate on 9212 Base Line 01 8. REQUEST FOR TIME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP NO. 552 THE PLIES COMPANIES - A subdivision of 38.6 acres into 4 parce s within the General Industrial area located on the north side of Arrow, south of I -15 Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to.be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission from the public microphone by giving your name and address. All such .opinions shall be limited to 5 .minutes per individual for each project. - Planning Commission Agenda -2- May 27, 1981 Approved 5 -0 -0 with condition C. that trees not be saved if driveway view is obstructed and that cap on wall not be required. Approved 5 -0 -0 with condition D. that CC &R's contain require- ment to keap emergency access open. Approved 5 -0 -0 recommendation on P.D. designation (TT 11610) Approved 5 -0 -0 with addition E. of total lot in recreation area to be brought back to Design Review and completion of flood control channel to satisfaction of City Engineer. Approved 5 -0 -0 recommnedation oriP.d`ae gnation (TT .11797) F. 'Approved 5 -0 -0 to recommend City Council adoption of Ordinance. Approved 4 -1 -0 G. Ap roweG 5 -0�0 with retention H. of si� 'dewalk requirement and deferment of land-cape, side - walk and other iL ,rovements until construction. Approved 5 -0 -0 to require a ;focused EIR on areas 2 -7 -8 and that this be required on all future EIR's dealing with this corridor. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 81 -08 - SHARM." - The deve opment of a pre - school facility in an existing residasca on 70 acres of land in the R -1 zone, located at 9113 FoothiiI Boulevard - •N 208- 241 -09 VV -V0 ,11 1101UJ — KLJ AJJUL. - A pianneo residential development on 4.55 acres of land, consisting of 28 dwelling units in the A -1 zone (P.D. proposed), being divided by tract no. 11610 into 28 condominium units 0 lot), located on the west side of Turner Avenue between Church Street and Base Line Road - APN 208 - 061 -03 -- -- -j- .,.0 .nsLJ lrlu.lo - n 60003 residential development comprised of 240 condominium units on 11.5 acres in the R -3 zone located on the west side of Archibald, north of Base Line Road - APN 202 - 181 -12, 21(portion) 1 +1Y1I,1]GrlLnl 1'LAI\ - AR 41111e11UITIUWL TO tine Kancno Cucamonga Municipal Code, amending Chapter 17.04, Section 17.04.080, to eliminate the tri- annual review period and allow pro - jects to be filed on an open basis. .+.+. n.n. nnu rnlxv 1'IAr 1 \V. 0101 CARNELIAN INVESTMENTS - A residential subdivision of 8. acres into two 2) parcels in the R -1 zone located on the southwest corner of Highland Avenue and Carnelian Street - APN 201 - 214 -05 rnnbGL PIHr 1 \V. 000-0 - KULL LYON - A sub ivision of 71.9 acres into four 4 parcels for industrial use in the M -1 zone located between 4th Street and 6th Street, west side of Rochester Avenue - APN 229- 261 -06, 24 I. ENVI MLAUUWS - Ine Planning Commission shall be considering a recommendation for requiring the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for a residential pro- ject consisting of 60 single family lots within the R -1- 8,500 zone generally located on the southeast corner of Carnelian St. and Highland Ave and within the proposed Foothill Freeway corridor - APN 201 - 221 -42 Approved 5 -0 -0 to deny extension Planning Commission Agenda VII. Old Business. J. -3- complex -located on th and Archibald Avenue. VIII. New Business May 27, 1981 Postponed to meeting of 6 -10 -81 K. Capital Improvement Budget Approved 4 -1 -0 to recommend City Council adoption of a L. Cable cion ealirt cable TV franchise. M. Resoia on ed sling with lot sizes IX. Council Referrals Item M: Approved 4 -1 -0 X. Director's Reports XI. Public Comments MF L I UR REVI E14 NO. - Proposed office corner of 19th St. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Sterns t-o be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. XIS. Upcoming Agenda XIII. Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.,F1. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE -PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING POLICY FOR LOT SQUARE FOOTAGE AND PRIVATE STREETS. WHEREAS, it is the Planning Commission's desire to establish Planning Commission policy to be used in the determination of lot square footage, and; WHEREAS, it is the Planning Commission's desire to establish Commission policy for the use of private streets in developments, and; WHEREAS, this policy will be used as a guideline for future developers; NOW, THEREFORE, BE. IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby establish the following policy: 1. Lot sizes shall be computed as the net lot area private drives or public or private.streets shall be excluded from calculation of net lot area. Equestrian easements and i:tiiity Basements may be counted towards net lot area. 2. Private streets shall not be allowed in any standard R -1 development except when it is found that no other access is reasonably possible and said private street would serve no more than 4 lots. The private street shall be allowed in Planned Developments when under Homeowners Association. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF MAY, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Richard Dahl, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of May, 1981 by the following vote to- wit: CITY OF RAiIZFIO CUQkL\1O \GA ,STAFF R.J PORT DATE: May 27, 1981 v L TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR TIME EXTENSION FOR SITE APPROVAL NO. 80 -03 BILL WYCKOFF - The deve opment of a Preschool to be located at 9212 Base Line. • BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting a 6 month time extension for the Preschool to be located at 9212 Base Line. The time extension has been requested to allow the project Engineer to complete the con- struction drawings (see attached letter). This project originally received approval on May 14, 1980. RECOMMENDATION : It is recommended that a 6 month extension to November 14, 1981 be granted for Site Approval No. 80 -03 Re4ectfully submitted, BKk:OC:cd" Attachment: Letter from Charlotte Wyckoff ITEM A CITY OF RAIUHO CUCAMONGA �o c�, "• �,�; 9FAF L' RI PORT w o } E- DATE, May 27, 1981 1917 TO: Planning Commission FROH: Lloyd B. Habbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: RE VEST FOR TI41E EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP NO. 5525 THE PLIES COMPANY - A subdivision of 38.56 acres into 4 parcels within the General Industrial Area located on the north side of Arrow Hwy, south of I -15 Freeway The attached letter from The Plies Company requests a one. (1) year extension of time for the subject parcel map due to the difficult financing market. The City Engineer approved Parcel Map 5525 subject to conditions on December 17, 1979. This approval expires on June 17, 1981. The requested one (1) year extension will expire on June 17, 1982. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that a one (1) year extension be granted. Respectfully submitted, LBH:BK:jaa Attachment ITEM 8 C (--AW e rGeei VP//Z/LCL�GGB.4 DEVELOPERS. REALTORS- INVESTMENTS May 1, 1981 'v Gi.- lu CpPdiiiO.r4iP C- D %U0�f$[NT i-.•.i:.f r1 1901 AM PAI Barbara Krall Engineering Technician City of Rancho Cucamonga P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 Dear Barbara: We.will need extension of time on our Approved Tentative Parcel Map #5525.. Enclosed is our check in the amount of $57.00 extension fee. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Yours truly, �V- 4-�� Daniel 1, lies DLP:ai Encl. 25283 Cabot Road, Suite 225, Laguna Villa. California 92653 Telephone (714) 770 -1633 0 E7 0 -- ``ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA S-FAFIF REPORT DATE: May 27, 1981 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: SHARMA - The development or a pr e is dente on .70 acres of land, at 9113 Foothill Boulevard. APP mrssr-to eschool facility in an existing located in the R -1 zone, located 1 208- 241 -09. ABSTRACT: The applicant is requesting review and approval for the development of a preschool located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Vineyard Avenue,. across from the Gemco site. The existing 2,000 square foot house will be converted into a preschool for 50 children. The project has been reviewed by the Design and Development Review! Committees and has undergone extensive revisions per their comments. Staff has reviewed the project and recommended conditions of approval are attached for your review and consideration. BACKGROUND: The applicant is proposing the development of a preschool facility in an existing 2,000 square foot residence on .70 acres of land, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, approximately 600 feet east of Vineyard Avenue (Exhibit "A "). The preschool will consist of classrooms and offices for 50 children and 5 staff. The project site is bounded on all sides by vacant land and contains several mature trees and shrubs. To the south and east is the approved condominium project, Tentative Tract No. 11459. The property is presently zoned R -1 (Single- Family Residential) and the General Plan designates this site for medium -high residential uses (14 -24 dwelling units per acre). The existing grades gently slopes from the north to the south at approximately a 2% grade, as indicated on Exhibit " ". ANALYSIS: The project site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use as shown on the development plan (Exhibit "C "). All building setbacks, landscaped areas, and parking -areas are being designed and provided in accordance with adopted City Standards and Ordinances. The illustrative site plan, as shown in Exhibit "B ", indicates that the applicant intends to preserve existing matt-re trees wherever possible and provide mounding and abundant landscaping along Foothill Boulevard and on -site. Access to the site is being provided by the expansion of the existing drive- way located along the east side of the property. A landscaped median strip will be provided in the ariveway to save the existing trees. Ten (10) feet of dedication will be required along Foothill Boulevard for street widening purposes. Accordingly, the applicant will be required to widen Foothill Boulevard and provide paving overlay, curbs, gutters, meandering sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. In addition, a lien agreement will be required for the future construction of a landscaped median island on Foothill Boulevard. The development plans as proposed, indicate a total of 15 parking spaces being provided, which would allow a preschool facility for a maximum of 50 children, with 5 staff employees. ITEM C Staff Report May 27, 1981 Page 2 LJ The applicant is proposing to repaint the exterior of the existing building. Photographs of the existing structure will to available at the Planning Commission meeting for review. It is recommended that all existing and proposed block walls be designed to integrate with the existing building and treated with an off -white stucco finish. The Design Review Committee worked with the applicant to formulate the design which is presently before the Commission. The Committee recommends approval of the design and that emphasis be given to landscaping throughout the site, parti.-u- larly along Foothill Boule•.fard. Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant is provided for your review and consideration. Staff has complete.' Part II of the Environmental Assessment and found no significant adverse impacts on th environment as a result of this project. If the Commi,•sion concurs with such findings, then the issuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order_ CORRESPONDENCE: A pubic hearing notice was advertised in The Daily Report newspaper on May 15, 1981, and five (5) public hearing notices were sent to surrounding property owners within 390 feet of the project site. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. RF_COMt4E11DATION* It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider a -the input and material relative to this project. If the Commission finds that this project is developed in accordance with the adopted Standards and Ordinances and does not adversely affect adjacent properties, then a motion to approve the attached Resolution of Approval with the conditions would be in 9rder. submitted, BHY.:DC:kp Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Illustrative Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Grading Plan Part I. Initial Study Resolution of Approval Conditions � ffflll �� • ., ' i •- [Ili'• ••I 7"' It -r ?r-iI�LL'II�_II�'�i�l. "II`I � ffflll �� • ., ' 11, E-11 q CITY (xi RA NCI-10 CUCAI\/IONLGA PLANNING DIVISION NORTH ITEM:_ C40!51-09 4Den AA TrrLE: 0% UIV EXHIBIT: SCALE: mww" V4 T-I . j tin 41 IJ CITY (xi RA NCI-10 CUCAI\/IONLGA PLANNING DIVISION NORTH ITEM:_ C40!51-09 4Den AA TrrLE: 0% UIV EXHIBIT: SCALE: mww" 4 E r� LJ NORTH CITY_ OF, ITEM: � �s® s RANCHO CUCA,MONGA TITLE: IMt, 9SIO DIM& PLANNING UI`'ISIChN G�CHII3IT� _.a- SCAi.E= ""' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL, STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SKEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental ASSessment Review Fee: ,S$O.00 For all projects requiring environmental re-iew, tnis form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Com-nitt.c tbrourh the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt >f this application, the Environmental Analysis stacf will prepare Fart lI or the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Commil'Fee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be Prepared, or 3) An additional information, report should :,e supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Pre School APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE- S.K. Sha:?ma /Nirmal Sharma 7577 Sunstone Ave., Cucamonga,CA. 9.1730 714.'980 -4186 1 ,MME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: 7577 Sunstone Ave.,Cucam OF PERSON TO BE CON"ACTED S. K. Sharma Office:714i nga, , ome : %1�I/ 01 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSE,cSOR PARCEL NO.) 9113 Foothill Blvd. R. Cucamonga,Ca. # 208 24 9 LIST OTIiER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIDNAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: State of California- Health and Welfare _ 1 -1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: A new Building wiI' wilt, but for now the existing building wili be u for the re Schoo ones .nor conditional use permit for 50 children ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF A-NY: W4 ac•reaae: 2.000 square fee after some time. DESCRIBE THE ENVIRGNMX TPP_L SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HIS..ORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): One story house and landscaping and trees Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series- of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environ:nental impact? NO El WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? NO 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration! NO 3. Create a substantial charge in demand for municipal services (police, £ire, water, sewage, etc.) ". NO r, Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? YES 5: Remove any existing trees? How many? 5 or 6 NO E. Create the need for use or Cisnosal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or exnlns;,..aG? Explanation of any YES answers above: I will try to save all the trees I can but I will have to take down soma dead trees. one rs just on 17oothlil SITi. IMPORTAMr: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page.: CERTIFICATION: 1 hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Date 4/6/81 Signature Title T 1 i' . RESOLUTION NO. 11 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 81 -08 FOR A PRESCHOOL LOCATED AT 9113 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD IN THE R -1 ZONE. WHEREAS, on the 9th day of April, 1981, a complete application was filed by Satyendra K. Sharma for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 27th day of May, 1981, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That 'the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, and the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed; and, 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on May 27, 1981. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 81 -08 is approved subject to the following conditions: i. That the median island in the driveway be extended northerly to the property line in order to preserve the existing tree at this location. Also it should be extended south to save one additional tree in the existing row of walnut trees. 2. That existing shrubbery adjacent to the building should be retained wherever possible. 3. Existing and proposed masonary walls shall be given an off -white stucco finish and provided with a capstone to match the color of the preschool building roof. El El Resolution No. Page 2 4. That a planter be provided in the parking area south of , the preschool ilding to pr erve_�ttT exis ing tree at this location ,` [ 5. That the proposed landscaped lanter along the east property line be continuous acrass the entire length of this property line. 6. That the parking lot design be revised to accum -)date the above listed condition. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF MAY, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Richard Dahl, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of May, 1981 by the following vote to- wit- AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 1 T El N yA A O 2 O v Li m •Z•1 O H K O t O fn El a (p 01 Vr W N O �1 f'r q h • < fJ Tom, r > > .. �n D NNpD wow ww° gWn N 'f D N a r •7 1 N b 1pS n N y0 A �'1 N A � > F D n> O w q c W 1, r� �. � i b r q N W N n O N q '{ i N rQr. ; '1 9 q S 6 r4 ID r.r 0 a 0 N X i r W A q l"f S b W O i O- N'fJ n O_ N O O K q q F n ^�G u. 2J r. N r. 4._ >•r >J NA •1 �i O NnT r.q FNq i.� r�� brG Jd +1_ O ryT O C > F 6 W� •+ O ft O A G K r•. _. ° O N err q m F 4 d q i O O ••�� N O 'J O O) J N - r0 O �• W 6 J q J C 7 N F r l< .-I N. ° b Gq rOT m fl •1 1 S r • 'O =. O O '> Y j F.urG M N C "� ^ J 9 D• q 7 a �� r �Q . N ••1 N ('' ^� N q� N O > 7 > � D. A r � N� q F n C OOY. S a S 9 r. n q >-+ �' .� y . > �•• F^ y J 106 q rdi rFUj•}�_Jr UV NAN r �.O r• W ,yq Ni7 <l KWq = bWN QW q p < m <; N �• O � O C Y •� O O d m W A� �b W N 9 J 1 rJlr N Zy ^u N y q 6 fr O N N •AND Cd •O w �C N b 4C O WN NrD 1. O S1 FO 'D N ]M1 SN? N i9 W6 W FS nNN >!p Oq ° u•n •f p B r• �[ J V D � Sr 'S � Iq q6 NdN N � �• WJ T f_.l O a nOOr n drr. r OV yCr ° CrdT. 6 GW O p N q> �• u r N F K y N n o m 4 11pp C � Z. 6 't u• d> P C � 7 F _+ > O �• O M1 T n � ° O d F � S C P O• l n 9 O W> O S � C. N S> F N N 1 > n J1 n S e Nr.N r. rr N ar .rrJ <� ON y >�O M6 r m r�r 70J u• m0 uJ q• • >n ro- 6 n O_ O NN q Or06W WA G T�•F ] V Nr rp fr ^� W� yn _^ � F N F U ° tnOu. 0 G O ' W 0+... O C C V ••. W F + q '^O n J 1Y Z4 Z Y, r N �• >An n u'6 .rr O r G. IF r•m �O �• f>i •�Cr O T N V Dj�a r + 6+r �+ ]N ]C 6 6> �• P Or it OarK F tW do > ijf b NS m W W O, G ? d a O L n S 1R� r- J b N r C �. o. 4 > 0) r 6 N O O N y •.• 6 N r. ONN �J CN aT jW MW <AAO Y `_ r rdn0 TG i1 6rrM ra O 6eu dO FJ +U •CO +.V [m'1 6• O'J16 v.N r OqW rO 6F SN 6 Ou O >+ N6N r •�• ON -r3 G< m NS° mp .4•° rOn µ a z r°�r .q. � q � r � or � rD d �a a � g y 2.2 x °N F� .°.� ?rte FVT o a� n r�u �+n o9 G '•n° �� y.` m n a yi or Q op. rD F> > u. -�. qr •.. > SS zr :O b V W N J N �: d N✓ O 1 N N O n °r C r ^ m J a O 1 nb > a r0 r•O fi Nm° rs ar0 � n.� ✓J 9K 4 �^ N a _ Yrr< fj r. f N O •-•'J 9 Q � r O q « 6V •u O.9 6G U rD F Z K g 2 ~ O_ W F Tr nO y 4 r An N m IV J N N N N N N N • Or Ur A W N O r0 Ol `I Or V1 y d OrD < v SPgn t lS ~Coer 1m�fb Y 'Fnw MdT IYN rm y y1 OVA d rA 1 T• r = ry > >N °an°�� SZr.N F q -� sN lN r � c i o. e'.0 ON a ^A J J anq AN a« y r q n >O a o.r W Ar �FNw �N r.n�• rF �n W 'c _ yJ .°�. j n�ry pn-y Fro. Fn c�q ur° „m'n'k YJ dti N� yN�r•• b �> 7•S �yNA d b >> n 00 2O u a a �• 1 J V• A 1 a + d 6 9.=n S W O K !l O � . C 1 µ b S •O >r ^ VC >N T N •n0 pn< �6N U >N? n•� 6. O Y.>q 1� N q> ad n° G > `1 FN u no > 6q Uy ID 7 rr Fq 10 � l A N 7'O > � - rrw�rya C. � I r� P1i �n ry r g N O o K4 N n+ 3 OF NO 6r.0b F ±O YV >7 2C. >^r N g6r.rro� 91 wn O> Q rOS C G y y F q 0. A r l IpN d rp i t d m N •� C N +. 9x ( +. 6 m d] •+ cam q _ n sn ro ° n0 -K• W �JOO� �.N O ��JY) Q NPa �rZO. fry L q� a6 nN Nlp J W r. � y. �T•rZ T F m <nN r. � ON Gd NNC ON .K•. .5S09 U• O > �N >r � > °G N x > u rD •K•NnLIn q � 6 N� m p•N C NN a O m n r0 ] 6 S W � O l > lAnyN Z�0 ar mF i� W � nj m O i rtcNr� � O. O•j. � � � a4 ry � i t N iqd � V N .O0 S—, q Q i O °a OR o. J w .m�a + N K. �dA �° Qr �•. 0• Fu•W G 6V F+ F r'9, d� r. N_ J O 0 J O O N N C J �• N W ` OC l6 Zq r ' 41 ^ KYO-1 > a 4 W C w Nr rNir q S q j u• Or• A•1g6 Q u Cr� IOI +. S� o o "m '> or. �_ W W °c. _• Fa +WC� ° ] nm �µ Od OK O mMC 9r n0 jl nq>'b ° N ruyi r>fn ON �^ Ori 4W�r• ��. •� >• r N or F> + W O -• K o + 3 nrm n �$o d u W s a irK � =rn N �n Cg J >r a i rJw O j f 0 r l O 7 O �• O V q m 6 O w > :i r d 6 � �1r�0 F 1 M �L-•Yq T rO ]aNN OK? W•G n d ns` a a LL N O. q 0A 6� r N T O... o N 1N1 TA =`• N n 1 J C 66` O 9 nwr b� ]W O dr6Wq OCO ra VC O �j yArPFJ S b O N l O < 1 N p W d r O F O> O N.q =0d srl •r nr G S KdN , n y 6 1 G 9 d n S p G C Q j.K aM1 Arlw O ^O r GL N d F IO r �N qG !0 q..406 V7 O a r FO � G O G 6> .qJ YM••rN S d 090 •'• S • prN S d.. w.n S O• JwC i W V rL O F O..r QN N6 M1r J~ pN F- On n Mµ` M N Vm i > Fyn O u q > 1 O S �rNN Ora � O q G El N yA A O 2 O v Li m •Z•1 O H K O t O fn El a M. � •� O. VI A 'y N r '/r .O W V O. 4. A W` '°JJ S p J S R °. ri J 3n> j'_�N91 �• �� W �9 O a q V T N1- �p`� wdU v% 4 L r •D 6 �d� C_ wr B f o TO >U CO. N T N r r r ::!Q I r W In � J T r rr T w•.`. r r N �.N �r.a ? J.'i. nn u.. .wh m° } j.. wfl fl b r� ` q J q mar io 9 f. } W J ^J � � O [[' »_ N Y. 1P J J Nl S�•O J µ pw Tl� I° •C �TJ Nq N IY W v� ll } w +� Nd W�rT. .w .w dU. p 6q pO� qY a9P pdgN rwm �1<�q jr T wb G N 9 w " J r JINCNj r0� N�L �t1 S. f01 d T O P .0 .� W fJ 0' 1 N • 6 O q 0 G �' W i 2 J " .O N O< y y " _ m nT Z IL YW} �'rJ �jp Nni Ti nwW0T�1' Npw y�NTY,wT ?�w J^ 6 0 rV O� OYNr 4 rV (y O D- 1N •S q .p p�N q T4 t n r�W _ N� ^rrq ( II.V yr•M qr�J 5.0 b?N < +r u.N i j S r O 4 N r q 1L NO'ON , R q 6 w J. ar ° R v 4 01° N O J ry W F O J - } 7 OWI�• �ro Olµq "Or qN N f/n} 46S�OTQO.. WOIP y I.,— •I1 'br ° rT j Q,b >q W a "N'O J W Sp J r.N q JO r.9 O SrwD N T•+ JN O .O pN, p"T• r 31 �bi '•74�N S 2r waJb '^ GW dAJ •f� .wj O n 6< Op N,W . >G-- tl. W ONr.N6 .w QO •{Y• ry0 r. T � •l2 O' 9 `Y " 9 TVy 1 6�- Nom. F. r TrNW 1 ryO JW > .9 uJ• �- � r O7 > rw fa rw O •< O > O d �. •N 'p � t N �. N 6 } N r el (Y y q IY .1 J > J 6 •1 N j 6 Iv O N O ^ �.• q N> ° J w W LL = > ro0 n^ •9 rw W N � O m Ip� p' Ip ^ Q 1('4 yNU J• wO T��.4 TEA NJ W1lYTr .W'•} nN C2N ."�� ^N ,q 1 On Nl bw0 N J pp 2 NRV'JwCIef4< }J MN A-w-� JK .w Nr N ^Ll i 7 rw.n r� q J q�'w4 N4 e _Nd iO 6YJ •a'N _ • N.O ^N Y] IJi S Nl U 1 W < TO J >N N 1 q N C °, qIw C + �. wC .<..1a J C cw• V nN N .- Np.r °qr N I N N d 0 N T SS- N N T w W °6b _ p .«4y1 0 " °KrWCO� W OY fir` WfJT W_ O�'°6n 2�j.0 O.r 4 _ W rNir OJ Nff� rl l O J W jw qC.. 1q O 00. Y( u �. ` r O 1 O .< N IL.I q 6 f.• _ O r 4 0> .° Y r O a S N C N S q Z Ertl- In 40d�r.l�Ta .O N 'faN OJgA• -•> Nn �J. N.. Wq W Tp M1INr.0 wVJ� - N uJ.1 STJ CAI T O r -O G" q G 0w O 9 t° 0 t m p 7 Nr. O 10 'l� O.0 M.a O NrTU WO .Ow •u > 'J ro m N wyjO�i.� 11 D•�T T�� _O CN ry14 A W`O S. O',£r]. .n NA V<N TNVq J6l ... N OS W...1 r `°. •. T y^ -- a w " a— o W ... W n J } J w> NT� � J rrr P > = np'TO N Y • • En W µ 5: O 6 N W P T •o O y J. W{ Ii l O O + ry r. _ J w N W b O W_ f♦ q W N N� w y °r0. ^j <��O 10 J w> O O,R , O r. w S 6' N Nir °O 6 >> -•.O ~ w q N nl W T � R < T P m M W �. 4 -w n N µ} N � v m ^ O< .•.9 w O S - r I Y` N S Yx@ N b •^ > c O i • d� j w 'N O ' o•. � 3 ' �.� � o1 W a -1 o. rr. bwA "'911 -z""" .. >oY J} A VTr NJb ZT, yT• s1q N N I'M >Wl6w 5.2: 4 pppq....��'I O qO NN Zj p` N �C -qy OOp l+.T YNC .1 N1°- ,C d Wd U1° p Q da J.N CSJ N JN N O r+ =n ". O y> J» it �! N °> TN N q ^ � r111 •-. 6 � T .. 1 O gft'N J 11 r. d• N �. � N > 1, O .. W N r• r• N 6 W T > 1>'1 A q ~ � `°C.. W � N N SnYT A N N ry r y 10 O + n U N p d d W y J q O� b p r P q O q rw i V• 4l b b A y q 1Ji• V �j -a- J W� 4 N •+� N" W , �. w w.. b d N� p r>i u N C q 6 A O lO p}i r W O `� p• � 4 O 7. gr..PjWq w � l q �W Jr 4b. ?. rq ^.0 6.4 1 S 3^ W pp j a I.Oi h .0 C O q C Yqi N Y �• q Iw C O T l 6 N W a _ N R °. r% 15 W T° Or.> I�p1 w•'1 > eJ "O > O q i. W q -O u p >NY) N.w T'1T q7 •h ... O ry 1 Ja �0. r.» 7 O r0. T 6 S O 6 O 1.. lel r WU _ g+ �P Vlq >q/Ji O O c Ow�q 6 r n S_ l N.d t0 T 01 P b � b O a q V T • • W N •1 •„1 m • IL N QJ I Gv P ? oP � f>Q Li$9 .J PLICS •rN Ir/I n v � �•• N S n b "'• (ilry N 1 A N N Z N N R 7 .r C S- 9 y � C i O1 V. w w� y C .w y p t1� 10 .`�. OU C t2G yr. N j rr� �rN TO NyrO •1 rN ip � NNlI� uJN j 1014 NNI•JQ �'i1 L IU Y] l `J n N w J ^ = tJ 0 0 O [1 d V , 9 4 r' O V F ^ `1 01 �• " O j U y1 P r^. •` r q 4 N .• p I N N 4 . =b a VJ FIN 1 O � T�� O � � O F fJ � i f1 � C •. N N� T? j` N g W W� Q r M1r�0 I N •C.y 10 ] b.�.'., N J �� M� OT6 H ry^ N J CN N f1W 0 "q•S- l ^b SN �d NW Dylll Ou^1 .n NCgYr IO Ny41Y r•.'.Jd 9ClWF y HOC % ^.GW 6Pb r•I'L^W W1pG r +• N INn N y N WN J•_nW Wr V' 6C l"1 OC 9NN r.W "J Y N 9J NJO.N GO �Opp I vim' 02 Vr.�W I.L O wJ�l m CWIJ r � •11W aI.Y..6.•.� 6�J ?•� O 0•x NON �r r ^n 74 6n NO_O W 1 � O J CpW A(I�F q_N eY OW wISV NS Iwy r.ry r II }O_N .W3`N sJRL`P NNa ^ aw•1N J�1N Yqb u^I� �O.tN yW �+. N r 6w �. �n m pq T FdNO n r Sy. O N 09^ p•Nn ��O O^ NFm 9j =i4 Yr j 9 nNOW ;�N�b "0106 V O4�WJ ;O �P�.1 >._T•.�p 1. J^ JL N� �b Z � OQJC ur1WOP NO10 N�i � r.WUD' qJ rS�J Or.W9 r.NNNTQO N F O J i 0 '_ri q 0 `r A S J ••"T sqi n u. ry O S V1 V T W `f v ION 6 n Q TQ��O ��6rVj r �. 4LS `J 09 »6 OSCJ •"n0 ^r.m9N r.0 flu NO wW 1 P N WO^ 'J C'0 Y IO N .6 rW.y•OJ. yrv•I0 `i +O>CN T�J 9 n T l T 9 y r. N W y r O r• N U• r O W r O• ION '� •> J 6 P. 6 � S qw1 6 y J� N I0 � NTT A T W 4 d O ^16 N N O ... 0. 1T , � N � Z j � N O • < F � b • c A �J r' i n to IN•• f> � O � J l0 0. � WWr � V y c O' � ID 6N T4 NIO .V 1 � KNr "Wq J MFn r.fl`f � Try STO ✓• i06W�J _J'l O' m 4 fq l 6 Sjd n `n • NN N T N?Nr J J ' "1' O b Y •p ON . J r � i 10 S4 N •II ry• N y19 O q N 6 .•.". gN40 r N.W.r< �W�w r6�wwn ~ OJi O C•S N q N T > N j W • q v W IyNyC• 11 rn � W� V• 10 NItN >�ry� J ^ NtiY f] V9 < �bfNw C1n��N. LiTW 40 6 O qN y O.ON`YN JOrN pV6TOOZl1NY. J j W •J Y' T r N� N n N °. d4r W N r rI q F�� r N� F SI IO •r C W ^ q R' N +' C J q? V C •rw IO J O.N WO CN d`µ' ^ n Nr.V� 0�4 Jr J.WJ >• •O .SI rnF ��nS q�TUnbiyT•r7 �.1 _ �^�l N^^n' JFT N�� Y WJN JN r4 rN Sr yd Tl O. �•� N J cm `O �C'I'�O uJ�0 J• r g �r' > P6 J cnW Y C >r. .yry ^ I� .. � ZJfWt �.NJCp CSrOwrp NpC rw7 y O \l IO 100 4�w0 • N" 19 ... 6 0101010 J90CwINi1 �9 >wN r•O W ., �� • � °" ° �a= °'� _ca 9 •� 4 _ �J L9 r.d r 9.1y J >Tr6 N ^r•..• N \� In 0. 0. r TOJ n9.3 jJ OWNp.'TN •0 � � W0 � ^�>rC vOWJ 4Or6 C.6 W >Or. OTrroOq r. O' .1 J ,^ W l T lC 10 W N ••1 N N Qtr n y 1� Cl F, y d �. 4 r 10 J ry 6• w• 9 0 tC N S J N r N r N n N W I I i ff; i � �r • j9� VI p W N J °p n�! q n_ r 1 4 . 2 W• C 411 ••1 y a V 1 a n Y W C1 lYQ9 0, O�� „i Tit 4� A O_ iNNOI ✓p •-I1 r. WOgw� Ina OV1 n V7i CO N� p�60. 7 r N f1 NO 7d S ` 11r 10 Q6W Y. r. i0 n�9 O N •aW PO ON 9 .p SOq ••d1 q N [l v>i n � Jr�bON NV1r g04N.N+. 06n W2 p Npmr dlb rl L^.b lJp lO `l uQim J6'ip Cp O.�V Nrlt JJ T l•I VVT WO. ll1 r�!0 r rW W •"1 IOV N� n106N :Z2 Y .f' tC A• O 9< 0. 4 W_ W J A W w 6 61 T F 410 N S 11 gLL0'7 q> NOS, �rvN r4.W OJN N�.r VI ONJ Wq pN 6 µN Cr IY R n m_ •i )f p •,; J C q6N W •I V4t1 N O N CI X60 N JS.J NCT6t IvOW ^NP Q 1W9 'JT Wr b� P O<z 1 Q 6o. P. 0. 1S NR.T�� Wr.ry yN9d ON µrye .`l.. NG.b NN r S�� 1 N r r N 4 6 m w N p O O N O `l= rl N «� r ° N N m .O ».9 % .•.O T •J NIf r Oi � > N N _W M 0r T 0. Q In O O n •II b P IJi1 J •II r1 _ O ^ pl N T N u=i m r 122! T J Nf. O 1 6 O 1F N l SyIf. Y J S T N N 7 •11 J 6 .•.IP 6 ry. J Q 6 W N Z l IJn � C' > O T T N 1< N .w V IO 0 r O O N T W C•�. q O J N� W N r • N I1p b CI N N 6 V fp' � r 10 O GJ P N N l N IO N N ;. oW N O P A T TNl INn ll � � >� A NSt1 'L iOb �Vi 0]µN WyO JR^ IO 1090 3t[ lf� r¢N 7 > N J l w N INy O W tC Wi. W94 r ln'n N 3 P N 1 W i Il d 6^ � T J _ O. J 4 J `• N r O `° l _ 2:- pl W W% 9uN ^ �\• ^I N1 p W6O1�> dNN NJaq°1 IONU 24q l �OZ O•w q O�0 4' N ['� d IG 1 P. 6 W C q r• ��jjjp ly u r•N d 4 1 ti j0 m ^IO qNi u.JC q �Ory N JOW SON � Sq3 Jq A ^�_ _ 4 W oNluT Nn3 ar °� aQW o� lv N0 IPa j O jq 1 n IOy ;� ^ 'i ••I �.b� ON � G N N �W J J � W � O < 1 y b µ 7 g r •r1 T N• � q 4n W � l0 ^' S E10 O. 0_41Nn' 1 JN P O sni•O O SWJ O r N S Or > w J S N 6 9 �• N w 10 N N L� . 7 10 ^ N O .7N p O Oi I0N >� .N..d YSr �J 1F IO 6 WrC O 1 S pbW4d6 1r p^ ^ Nn� � � 9N•Jr 10 O O w r O r fly ^' q 6 •-1 f r O r w^ µ 6 ^ , n O J W' N ... fl 3 � O w . p Y W 9 A V Oryry U n 4. e Y U S T b � o w � •C T S Or � Q V n- O 6 N N w c}J <q 2 rV 6 � O ]C �a r� �w r L -+ O Nfj11 1l O O S > Q N 2 N m N O Nd a V• M N N ;�s a NlT^ ID 6b /• N C •w ^w� T ID •+ r. N ^ � A _S• N W 9 �T �N N R N O Y y N_ l 4 > m -11W fu r_ � J a° W w_ io O VN N F O r._ t b 1 OJ 01 Y W N? 2 N N r ° N � Nr 6 R q > j N JC Y .. o J Y a� C C W v s -• V n w N N N p N 9 J O r i Df � N 6 6 w l9 F�: n „ IG j. u > � W O q O' 4 N > NN J N � W W 6 w. N C a= O N o y. N 7b n H rC1 > W 10 Y. � W N N l ry� EM bTr n r p N � 60>•• N 10 > n o• •n O � �N J Y. �O 1 n oa N w 6 �a � r W > �V V N • W Nry n G a TwS T .0 ON.• ry n N l O !f ;a O C t §2 = J R T ^ O 1 N N O C N Oq �. v u> q O M 4 9 0 6 � N � q q NON 6 N O W ,• y I.r ti 17, 1- 1ti M1: n ti G r YJ N \• L Glf 1( N ra- o \ 9 G A ! •, m Nra1ry �r r• N rNIWID \C �O • CJ •J GYSq O A ^ I+• N �1$� elgo N S O O W p. N C +� S N 4 N r � rn n n f• �� N •n 1 NO N Op'wJ -r1 �. Y• _ r N >N9 9 r l >OV Yr• > W wJ •/. ^1 l_ lil gnm i. 0•NNIOIyy g6ty l ONS w9 V ••. Y>]N J••'00. �1 NNO 4 • � r^ J 1 N W l I K�fI 60 n O > N O� r'• O 6 X' i N � •JN f.D N - C1 ••. Ouwi ffiV4 N WO q mN NN> Or0 rO. li• i J j !) > 110 O N otl d> °• '] rw6 b r N b N -•b �. 9 V J m > 7q wN q� ^N m m to 6L7 loi b �1� ..1 •f � n� n 41 R W lql 01 T n N S 0 1+ W � N 1 n N yy w^ N I•• 00 O » NN t ... +1rS n A •LTOaW. Y ••1� ••. 6 Go_ N 1 ` Tw > °•J 09wT `J on No. S 3 74 n A4 NRn n� n k�1 0 0 6 q •J ID V� V r° 8Ti O rn O N 4, n1 n n0 h R• N O W� F U V V >nG O l 9N V] n o NSW c 10 C •• K1n �.\c J -1 S r •.. 4V6b e Tw�� >> S iT -1111 V —iD4l� 'l00 w1n1 N IN • w w0 Now •r1 :� % NOb S b� T N N N ••I N•�l I N Ij. _V O W b ?I :l N w% W� �• O J 6 1 9 r.G J W 0 O 1 ^� N N T O>O � VJ •.O b p j w 1p 6 •t 4 5, O t r r 6 ro w y.1�i1 > T 4 r R N O o N N J 0 > 6 o W' N ... fl 3 � O w . p Y W 9 A V Oryry U n 4. e Y U S T b � o w � •C T S Or � Q V n- O 6 N N w c}J <q 2 rV 6 � O ]C �a r� �w r L -+ O Nfj11 1l O O S > Q N 2 N m N O Nd a V• M N N ;�s a NlT^ ID 6b /• N C •w ^w� T ID •+ r. N ^ � A _S• N W 9 �T �N N R N O Y y N_ l 4 > m -11W fu r_ � J a° W w_ io O VN N F O r._ t b 1 OJ 01 Y W N? 2 N N r ° N � Nr 6 R q > j N JC Y .. o J Y a� C C W v s -• V n w N N N p N 9 J O r i Df � N 6 6 w l9 F�: n „ IG j. u > � W O q O' 4 N > NN J N � W W 6 w. N C a= O N o y. N 7b n H rC1 > W 10 Y. � W N N l ry� EM bTr n r p N � 60>•• N 10 > n o• •n O � �N J Y. �O 1 n oa N w 6 �a � r W > �V V N • W Nry n G a TwS T .0 ON.• ry n N l O !f ;a O C t §2 = J R T ^ O 1 N N O C N Oq �. v u> q O M 4 9 0 6 � N � q q NON 6 N O W ,• y I.r ti m 1ti M1: n ti G r YJ N \• L Glf 1( N ra- o \ 9 G A ! •, m r• N • m N �1 O A ^ i t J•-l. NFl O T' Eil h W' N ... fl 3 � O w . p Y W 9 A V Oryry U n 4. e Y U S T b � o w � •C T S Or � Q V n- O 6 N N w c}J <q 2 rV 6 � O ]C �a r� �w r L -+ O Nfj11 1l O O S > Q N 2 N m N O Nd a V• M N N ;�s a NlT^ ID 6b /• N C •w ^w� T ID •+ r. N ^ � A _S• N W 9 �T �N N R N O Y y N_ l 4 > m -11W fu r_ � J a° W w_ io O VN N F O r._ t b 1 OJ 01 Y W N? 2 N N r ° N � Nr 6 R q > j N JC Y .. o J Y a� C C W v s -• V n w N N N p N 9 J O r i Df � N 6 6 w l9 F�: n „ IG j. u > � W O q O' 4 N > NN J N � W W 6 w. N C a= O N o y. N 7b n H rC1 > W 10 Y. � W N N l ry� EM bTr n r p N � 60>•• N 10 > n o• •n O � �N J Y. �O 1 n oa N w 6 �a � r W > �V V N • W Nry n G a TwS T .0 ON.• ry n N l O !f ;a O C t §2 = J R T ^ O 1 N N O C N Oq �. v u> q O M 4 9 0 6 � N � q q NON 6 N O W r h • r0 m {D • N P W N � :] . 7q wN q� ^� t'.V ^� rV •.J rWpN N'n NV} n.y 6T ` Tw > °•J 09wT `J on No. NRn n F n 0 0 6 q •J ID V� V r° d. 4 r InIO n0 >r 6A : R �� V nh an.N.. 4V6b N .T.' i�� i�ry rO.y •1 nW NIVq Nlnir 1grrW O O O>O q •alj.O q O A 6 -J y.1�i1 G J NN 9N \ V T N 4 q n q1 >� ,V7 •y1q f>u ..l w WyN r6 ;r O wV S'N L(]' �N NT 8r J• l0 �^W� Sl^ 2N O >'u. •w_q ` � ^ �.d �b N� yN SS tO.. N7 Ip N a9 •� 6 � N q e• VOir O'Gi N it q w 4 l N �� V. q N N 9 1>ir � lq O� ewi q O vO ir M fl f1 �. �' \ •f b ' 1q •1W q> = N N r0 pY nu 6fTl W N Nq q n0 00 yN d na�N GO' Ji a1On 1µ q ON P ryW Z7, T y q °i Ol � G (.r q fl4 YN >' C W O' N R' OI O' l q N 1 O q �. VJ > ° J 6 r 'V q •CI m r. Y ^ q f)n m OW N 10O b S q N >O > r• ; i J J .+ N . 3 > il l O == 6 O w I W q N �• W ly V' n U V •C w C' 1 T n O r Ci] W O •5 � b N O-r>r• N V>iA NN 1 I >�> O VIi In w0 Oar •C O > q1Y; pd 9� 6N4 � 10 MN O Jr Y qV N, O'� R �wnR W, 2c �J• Y Nd iDO O� fjAy pn. `l O 7f w q4 Jq S O 6�PN an •V >ON r NCClln w fd SIJ q f J S q � W ^ O i m Y a ; q l O. r O 7 O ID N j• qO. ` r N O n > 4 10 T iD m q b ' ' N661gi1 t O •'n b +C q m ..0 r '.rv'..0 l N a n 4 O r ^ � J b N .R. > O Jr N N4 µW m0 1N•S.W 1° � O N W > N � O N. .V 4 V• w NR l w•'l >N O N '.l b. y:.. V' J l� q n.n _ N� 1 q q N 6 l' PY` p 6 a •C1 ON N M N W .w.. N•^LiT Cj O a... mq N 9 n 9 n G n q c 6 ? F O nnra O g J W 9 O = V fJ q Y � \} :5,93-i \} ( /�! ! ( \)(( }\ \ § }}[ � ( }- / ƒ [ \) \ \ } \} 3^ \� \ /\ �\ \) i }. PC L.-I � \ ; f7} L.-I MY Or RtANCNQ CUCAM0r4GA S7Aff REPORT DATE: May 27, 1981 T0: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: residential development on 4.55 acres of land consisting of 28 dwelling units in the A -1 zone (R- 2 -P.D. pending) and being divided by Tentative Tract No. 11610 into 28 condominium units (one lot) located on the west side of Turner Avenue between Church Street and Base Line Road - APN 208- 061 -03 • N ABSTRACT: The above - described project has been reviewed by the Growth Management and Design Review Committees and has successfully attained the necessary points for consideration by the Planning Commission. Staff has prepared the recommended conditions of approval and a detailed analysis of the project: Please find attached a Resolution of approval with conditions for the Tentative Tract and a Resolution recommending approval of the Planned Development designation to the City Council for your review and consideration. BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting approval for the development of a planned residential development on approximately 5 acres of land located on the west side of Turner Avenue between Church Street and Base Line Road (Exhibit "A "). The project is designed as a planned development consisting of 28 dwelling units, enclosed garages, private patios, and common open space areas. The site is presently zoned A -1 and iE occupied by an unmaintained citrus grove. Surrounding devel- opment consists mainly of single family residential development with undeveloped land to the north and west. The project site and the sur- rounding undeveloped area to the north and west is General Planned for residential development at 4 -8 dwelling units per acre. This project proposes a density of approximately 6 units per acre. The project has been reviewed and rated by both the Growth Management and Design Review Committees and has successfully gained the minimum threshold n -2cessary for consideration by the Planning Commission. ITEM D Environmental Assessment /Planned Development 80 -03 Aft May 27, 1981 Page 2 ANALYSIS: The project, as presently proposed and with the conditions recommended by Staff, will be developed in accordance with the State Subdivision Map Act, the City Subdivision Ordinance, and the Zoning Ordinance. As was previously mentioned, this is a planned development with common open space usable by project owners. All dwelling units meet the building setback requirements along the street frontages and are set back a minimum of 25 feet to adjacent property lines and to the south and west. All units are provided with an enclosed 2 -car garage and private patio areas. The dwellings are placed either as 2 attached dwelling units or a 4 -plex combination. The project does not propose any perimeter walls either along Turner Avenue or the proposed street. Access to the project will be provided from a proposed street off of Turner Avenue. Private cul -de -sacs have been created to serve for appropriate turning radii for fire protection equipment and provide additional landscaping and parking areas. Each of the dwelling units are also provided with a 20 foot minimum.driveway apron in front of each of the garages. The Conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan has been reviewed by the Grading Committee and has been approved subject to the approval of the final Grading Plan. The project will be utilizing a combination of underground storm drains along the southern boundary of the project and proposed streets to drain the water to Turner Avenue. Adequate flood protection measures are recommended by the City Engineer that could take the form of increased curb heights, flash walls, and mounding. A significant portion of the site, more than 50 %, is proposed to be open landscaped areas. The Turner Avenue frontage will not be walled, but rather provided with mounding and appropriate landscaping. The Site Plans presently indicate a curb- adjacent sidewalk and, after dis- cussion with the City Engineer, we recommend that a meandering sidewalk be utilized in combination with the mounding. In order to meet the secondary access requirements required by the Fire District, a turf - block fire lane is proposed along the southeastern corner of the project. In recent discussions with the Fire District, we have round that using compacted decomposed granite with 6 inches of native soil on top and planted with grass, is acceptable to the Fire District for a fire lane. Therefore, it is recommended that in lieu of the turf -block proposed, decomposed grantite or other - table material vequired by the Fire District be used and compacted acceptable levels. Environmental Assessment/PD 80 -03 May 27, 1981 Page 3 The Design Review Committee has reviewed the proposed designs of the project and :ias found them compatible with adjacent proposed devel- opment. As details of the recreation building and pool area have riot been submitted, the Design Review Committee recommended approval of these areas in concept only and that details of this area End the building be provided for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits for this project. The attached elevations portray one and two story buildings consisting of exterior materials such as heavy textured stucco, cedar grooved siding, wood trim, plant -ons, and architectural 70 asphalt shingles. Detailed colored elevations of these buildings will be provided for review by the Commission. Attached is Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study and a field investi- gation to determine potential significant adverse impacts upon the environment. After completion of such study, Staff has found no sig- nificant adverse impacts upon the environment as a result of this pro - iect and_ therefore, recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. CORRESPONDENCE: This project has been advertised in the Daily Report newspaper as a public hearing item and property owners within 300 feet of the project boundaries were notified by mail of the hearing. To date, no correspondence has been received regarding this project. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to consider public input on the project end all of its elements. If, after such consideration, the Commission concurs with the findings and conditions of approval recommended, then adoption of the attached Resolutions would be appropriate. Res ectfully submitted, B RRY, . HOG - ity Tanner BKH: V:jr Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Illustrative Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Project Perspective Exhibit "E" & "F" - Building Elevations Exhibit "G" - Floor Plans Exhibit "H" - Conceptual Street Alignment Initial Study Part I Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract 1 1610 Resolution of Approval for PD 80 -03 vicinity. map - no scale CITY OF ITEM: ] r M010- P D• So -03 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: L 041A 'ION MAP PLANNING DIVISION LYH[IiIT:�_SG1LL:g I] L:'J FORTH i7 F of I71w:fdl '"Wotttw9' eepov 00] lN3ndo -OA30 uev9.F imn 9Z C4 A '�t7 '�6B1MMN '0 =VMOHB '"Wotttw9' eepov 00] lN3ndo -OA30 uev9.F imn 9Z C4 A w O n f� • ": � • ..' :: • . ` ' :: a :r.,oi�ro , .� .,,� � • :: • „ : • • • :: � a of s�trfooesv sib 1 1�lt!M h � m >. t • w o m a 'Y * i. , i � �„ MOM013I.30 17 Smuw" m "WON& iv"3C inn 03mvia. JJNi1 9Z • s f� �!7 i F ' z � C ju CO 'I tlI� (70 a� 1�lt!M h $9e?Ii • a : E �!7 i F ' z � C ju CO 'I tlI� (70 a� • a : E jg R` �z �!7 i F ' z � C ju CO 'I tlI� (70 a� r � i � r iir'••,s1j 4 I '� �V ,.� N, itn-' T- IA l l t 1 a�L a i:: �.�, ". ♦ ♦ ♦� iii ;. Ott N ( 1 M 11f� 7t• 71 • il .IC: ■ .I,S IIIIYMOM,,11. rr�� 14n ' „ '�.. �.1rF rYWIUWC•;.I...�'.. R,, ,.i i.,.�14Jy1 � .,. � �r, w.R�J�' •fQ, �• � 1 r 1 o � z A �Ji �_� - I -�k .- . _ �powvroon AvsMUr nNAN"WrV 1 "MINT wANCN d Q 7 V n 144(e, H w90 e evuwrwcr ►NOrrtwrr .aNm paswA � Asrew PF.&rA cv i V, �5H STf�& Z Z lll Q m ~ n Ix a d C O. m � Z W a H � O m a CD � �`•' V fa N o Wa O a Y tl a f Ua o Q J r. Q � r r Y «w� S9 a «r^ �� ww ®sc ww o+o ti' 4 _. >. C O. m � Z W a H � O m a CD � �`•' V fa N o Wa O a Y tl a f Ua o Q J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM014GA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmenta' AsGCssm; =_nt Review Fee: $60.00 For all projects requi.-ing envi= onmenta.l review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the initial. Study. The Development Revieu Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impart and an Environmental. Impact Report will be prepared, or 3; An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Tentative Tract 011°10 APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: (--?L_S Aagnciates. Tnc. 320 Sarato -ia Ave., Ln- Gatos, CA 050'3n r4n3) 354 -55q,1 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: .J.Nl. \/Vilsnn, 387 North Second Ave. Unland, CA 91795 (714) 985- 2995 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL, NO.) Turne- Ave. s/o Fa�eline Ave., Rancho ^ccamonaa, CA _ AP# 2019- nG1 -03 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: Nine I- r. PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Planned Community f_ evelnoment consi,tin-i )f 29-2 lnit-, - one and tv-o tory buildin -is ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 4.55 Acre groG; 43,350 S.F. of orovo ^ed huildi.nj, DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS)- The cite is -currently vacant, surrounded by --innle family dwellin^is on the South and East, vacant on Vest, and aeveral buildin^is on the North =ide includin^i sinile family dwellin -i, qPeruioment ,had,; and a former vinery v-hich dates to aho,,t 1''34. - Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series - of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? No 11 Y- 2 WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO _ y_ 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? X d. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc_)? X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? C X 5: Remove any existing trees? How many ?Grove_ X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Expla.na.tion ' emoval of of a any YES answers deteriorated )rareie above= -irove IMPORTANT: if the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by the .Development Review Committee. Date_ ��2 go Signature Title / c - r I -3 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 80 -03 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE ZONING FROM A -1 TO R- 2 -P.D. FOR 4.55 ACRES LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF TURNER, BETWEEN CHRUCH AND BASE LINE. APN 208- 061 -03. WHEREAS, on the 27th day of August, 1980, an application was filed and accepted on the above described project; and WHEREAS, on the 27th day of May, 1981, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public ti'aring pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Ra...no Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed zone in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; c. The proposed zone change would not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and 3. That the proposed zone change is in conformance with the existing and proposed General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that tt::s project will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on May 27, 1981. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 27th day of May, 1981, Planned Development No. 80 -03. 2. The Planning Commissior hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Planned Development No. 80 -03. 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission snall be forwarded to the City Council. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF MAY, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Resolution No. Page 2 AIL BY Richard Dahl, Chairman qV ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of May, 1981 by the following vote to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 11610 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 11610, hereinafter "Map" submitted by R.L.S. Associates, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as 4.55 acres located on the west side of Turner, between Church and Base Line into 1 lot, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on May 27, 1981; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 1.1610 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. &I' Resolution No. Page 2 AMEL (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 11610, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION: 1. The sec_.dary emergency access shall be constructed of compacted decomposed granite and covered with 6 inches of native soil and planted with grass. 2. Designs and details of the pool area and recreation building shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. ENGINEERING DIVISION: 3. A parcel map for the entire recognized parcel proposed to be divided shall be submitted for approval and shall be recorded prior to recordation of this tentative map or issuance of any permit for the project, whichever comes first. 4. Any applicable portion of the conditions of approval for the above - mentioned parcel ;nap shall also apply to this project. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF MAY, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: _ Richard Dah Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of May, 1981 by the following vote to- wit: f.� Y.4 'a� till.' 1. y.1 �'.1 '�� .I�I'•1 .III f.� Y.4 .9 S O yW yW F O g 0 a v a W 4 - u u o �• wb �y V QY w C O L 4 O L .'L �.•G. c N Na V N i � ° � �° N Y L U „ N OG �• O s `C ` N u y� L^ O. •' Obi u G r ^ N Y tVIV L _y J••OT •p LN u : c r �O ' [' O T ��^ M N PO q�N Au L ^ .., ^� N lIN Q �a Y�O .-I• v� I°irN N Y c � o. .p al Vq ea °•L^ w 'd L V i �J� :^ 11 O V„ o N..O• yW 1J b ^ •.n ^L TYrJ.� LCV * PF COO � •ryV .W.u° SUN EP :; A '_N�Y N% �^ ^ N N Y VY 4 q d b L u yV y bG Z� b•n L� 9 nT° Y U L ryE cac q N .r •. 7 ^ V N L b W L ills v •9 d� C= q 8 � L' V •^ ^ 6 �/ Y 4 Ln• « •O � L. L'`V Add •nC VAN V q u it qb T bV- 'PJ � N • VV ^ co <N qc �p oily J CI d V•4 3 OI gq VW A� J�AO Y N q T F+ .• � N •. N O N••Cn N •-. O` d•°n y^ ?NI VYC L'ON lr•C w•b q ' _ r0 }� C U O. LCjI[}' 9y j O V Yi J CY r \ \YIII °uV •u0 -'iL eI FI yo Wd �Y 6V N t�j' (u_VCY Llcud W t G C M P r �• F O 6 b V • VI J w^ O. N V y. G z-.-- •- A F .^ F O Ni C✓ N y• ! q •n r« n ^ V L u _ C L A p {V.�, Y •' Y G y L1 , W u MY. 2'�•t6 � y 6 Fill V Fill I'a Y ^^ 0. V. ••. yy L°O q L W LL � M . A O �b q FJ 6 bl] •,l W[O1V Or U CCC y � d ^� ^�O. q0 N q W C YV N TO N j n� qr L•-. WVYLI �� '� c NOq iF >• Vu N� G L V ^ N V '• � !] ^ y '.N 0. 6 M C inn VNA4 .•. M L •L q F � � N Ll L O 4N ,- Y N tA. i 0. V O n C 0 7( 0 4 } ^ L° •n � N V _J L N C }° `�° u u > L V T U aaa CW N qPA LU Cb U •-.. IJn� y •' N uN •°.. 4n L ^N•^u ° 04 Gt c.L • O• •� b a L J d N V M N ° ~^ /i V V WN yV.� rNA 13 O V u y Y L A p O u a V Ina T L.•. �. ° E .•.N6 OfnO ^ O L ' Y •.. p .^ C. 3J y A N� Y L A r « VOI a 44 N �' •^ Y NLJU OT Ab•+ •-� •. ^ V. r 4 J O.Y^ G L Y q a ^qL r a L u E C^ N C g V L > ^ VY „Tr Oi „•� CC• ° O ICY u V6 C N L, Gn ,� U ^ n �p uVFa>. O O INi Y N{O V`E LZ L6r V �C r �. .�/IU C �' 9Va Y _ <° N° K 'OP _N a YaL _N _N V'Z L' Yly Ny + U q•.C•q ^ 4i' n i L jW nTp NN V6 C C u•.nf r Ic LaL'O. n 4 Y 6 N O FV -• a' i ^ C .f. 1) L n I> � q L q � y� >I • a G i �^ l N ANA ••' A „I b _C 6 C 0 V N i L O N V •' d Y Y° O q L a W C V V C d Y L r^ P L 9 L ^ A ^n V C °C L VI P� E� Yp Z N N W n L r uP CO 4• S O. N ••C.. V CG Y y pCI C •-. N .N • C u u a Y N N .•'. x N V> � W N ✓ w y .� � C G SILL L U •. Y ^ � -- N° V � T V •l ' V p' AG TL 01' Y �i v��'E �Cl CL' NOCY jq uLiu N Y•� a V. lai• C W + a N V/ C K r N ^J C V° N M ° °' ^ ^.:. N�NGGN C V V U^ l •^a V^ �V L °u.°• y� bcY.T 4J N uY yL V� au >.O bAU uc FmL 0,,s .�V Q OIN Y Uy a � CC.. V.•.Y `u Cylq Von 6 C•°r - °O CV r ' {. C L V O N L J L � L V r U V t W° °� q .19 u Y UU O F.' E� •p y1 � •nO L Nq u ^V a � N ^ OlE VV W NYq P� •nY N NV O N •.C- W W mob. ^ a.L •_.3 N J lq•N [T q QC NW NC_ YvOi Na uO pn L Yt4 4 F- Jrq Y 60 L S O yW yW F O g 0 a t W 4 - u u o �• O O• O� V QY w C O L 4 yu L .'L �.•G. c N Na N i � c-bN• � �° c Nc °y' >v s W � c 0.� J y u : c r °� N •_ • q�N (TV L OT ^� lIN ^ N I°irN r I N L y V E 11 O F Y o N..O• yW 1J •.n ^L �G * PF C 6YI Qr z�^; Y 0 u N% �^ ^ N N Y •�`i bG Z� b•n L� re nT° -q 4'-ai ryE cac �N i d� C= q 8 � L' V •^ ^ 6 �/ � 4 Ln• wai L. � L'`V Add •nC VAN V q u qb bV- N Y co <N qc �p oily J CI d V•4 °N OI O1] VW A� J�AO N F+ .• � N •. N O N••Cn N •-. O` d•°n y^ ?NI VYC L'ON lr•C w•b q ' _ r0 }� C U O. LCjI[}' 9y j O V Yi J CY r \ \YIII °uV •u0 -'iL eI FI yo Wd �Y 6V N t E Ell- ETA W - u u O ('• Z O O• O� V QY O L 4 yu L .'L �.•G. c N Na N i � c-bN• � �° c Nc °y' 'J °� N •_ • q�N (TV L OT ^� lIN ^ N I°irN r I N L y V E 11 O F Y o N..O• yW 1J •.n ^L �G * PF C 6YI Qr z�^; Y 0 u N% �^ ^ N N Y •�`i bG Z� b•n L� re nT° -q 4'-ai ryE cac u1 C= q 8 � L' V •^ ^ 6 �/ � 4 Ln• wai L. � L'`V Add •nC VAN V q u qb bV- I.O Y co o.a qc �p oily ON �e V•4 °N OI O1] VW A� J�AO N F+ pNN FO N •-. O` d•°n y^ ?NI VYC L'ON lr•C w•b rr WL�In W r0 }� C U O. LCjI[}' 9y �^ �_ Yi •ny> °Lr° �„ °uV •u0 -'iL eI FI yo Wd �Y rL. «C t�j' (u_VCY Llcud W t G C M P r �• F O « b V ° N w^ O. N V O W • CLV W F .^ F O Ni O ^1' y d Pu �N G NN CF6 F _ MY. 2'�•t6 � .•L.� •nO C ^ L �C•Lq ••. yy L°O ^T H° � M A O �b q FJ 6 bl] •,l W[O1V Or ul ^ u •V ^� ^�O. q0 •O. q W C nq �CW TO N j N q N b P F t !I iF >• L Y V L V mIJ.1u d tl ••C. b- •L^ 4U0 Vi C N W •1 F N Y qqn•_ OL Y Op 1 V IF. I'b Jg10 � C u uC V 1�1 glNS N L O 4N N qWd q q L> •.L. V N N III YOB V C dv V l •W.. 64N q p F J�u F u { G[� Qa� y L WLF CN a qPA 00. Cb U •-.. OI••n qr F Nn O. O i'I•°. C Nu A WN yV.� rNA Y WVN �qp�I V9 ¢L' qq uC JVY L�.' �L A_T $ .•.N6 OfnO C,' •luG 6 w.F �.N C V ^d AO CWT ^�VI° ��' N Yy ^C NLJU OT Ab•+ •-� W PO O.Y^ NY nN > •V VY „Tr > OO a q l•pY O FL ICY O•. C N L, Gn ,� U ^ n O O INi Y u.' na G �. --C LQi1W O.q� ats V L N° •� OL _N Fr° _N _N t � ✓.YY H¢ 1••TN Q Y- q•.C•q LLt °' Y '• ,CL ti VF-1 1- 6 N O K° u� E Ell- ETA TO J •N•• � C ••d L °—°. o r W ° �� i qc ° d i.G. Y ° c v N � w W ..•o Nd cc �' cw Na c`WdN S; �^ uO q °ice u 4C V V q ul Cy vulqu VNC O iC A._ .n 4W uV w ° CO y _ NVL +LY Tµ uq Gq 1: O T lyC` nCy V VO.d V CWN V� � I'^ <Y —. 404< +•f qN u �[ °r q � rA y i F» q d ^ j V L OI O ki L. V O TN N r0.1 N p V O N N r O L U V s 22 V d q r —L u Or Pv yOL r O�.y.NUUTY. ..q x •Vn u qV � L —° C q+ CN Va -O' < < W♦- r V V 'P Gu V x LC l4rN N ^ N! Nq > L 4 q S V W < JN ^ �e0 2 O• Nnu c V L qr O r < NO (i OdG U L1 JCC >q �N W CN d OV T. ^•N r q O •v YC y fy 4 P < WQ w O +L PNL W 9V= ^ 4 � CL A Y.. �O LN O O• i6. YWY u V C `q d -gNN4C e —uC F V W a C d Y O pp V Y ° u 6 l' a 7 OI O >L N ° N � u� ~ O L+ O C •G/• � V W 4 L L r N A✓? i C u V T u � � ~� 1 6 d r � O 'N ^ ° N N L G � < °vii !MN >- C ._.i0 I=i• L•i •VV q �� .:� Pj ° VE •II .°i�0� i ✓1 V W �! .�„ 'J O V q lO] NNUZY.4 V• C U y_ 4•- N Y r. P O. w EI !J ° V� y y G y J L ^ q M d Lp V L A � Vlf � l: W M+ U' V V Vw T 9Cu f C 4 ° zz ° dC •r Np• ._ ._ L y0 L O F G S P to Y. •O LN V �..^ dL P C V V� =< Aq`N M l'Y W VIP = V ATVIC dO V w •N Ind N {• q Y. N N l d._ 'T ; [' O x ` VI 4' K L d ... C W G q C•i C b N p> u V a� u }. J °N •C4 °� « �yd N C ~_O p. � L .Vi1W•O � °•p •n N u C _ L' NV^ C W d Nq •� W .•V.0 1Y L` a/1 d Ad••"r06V 0.q Y Y Pu O�GN y.Nb C •u NC N G L �V O> yu bqW nC.°�OP ✓�C Cr._y y��° ❑d W`« TuV CSI N'V^ dC1 YF IL � NVI V.G V7 UTNV 1-Yw Q.n 4 ryWry� O�qC + �� ✓�u... 6xG 66m IC-•4a �4 f>.�i• 60 r�a >q r64 A =Va N`O ✓1 O 6�w.V Zr V 6 O .I. O W c c o q �Y C El `W ip o�Y c: i- •i a� �' � hp c =+° a¢Y •`.`�, q c p°uL•',•_`m .N-Li H Y qor ni ¢� d_c c -° +o oN c'.MO... qZ q ^L WL tTU � NO. Nrr `N« ipL CP« P^ � VOiC O -d'�O Cy)° Lw O�Y OrC. C< Y •°GN'V xN4pL WdY q d «[.. r yL NV uP NTV q4 -6 PCjC°�u..0 qY„ q •__ NqV .._O wr �u ._v Y qY d q L ° O G y` N F r TI V O <• q O G N Gd✓1 N O W q O <qV•' •qr d L N N Ww +y t O u� a L' �' V N V r- n •^ C: d N °i•Y .L' T C oY. T q > d 4 •w y y 7 V V t5 V V d VOV u0i� .N«y L L d .O v V qC V C� Oq 10 PV 4 r N O V� •. d 7• ^ N l� 'O l 2-2 N C P ° V Y.� ° O ` N P V q W H: � T N G ° d G a< T y° L V N - •yV G d P ^l N Y. � TY p• L cwr c f •-Y L u c Op p— `/ L d tt . Cl q GVV o?'i ..N + ' n L ..- .+ qqT 21 u V u u !] Y L 4� —•�.Lq OuP N < ✓VIY. O.._ .. Y 4i u 01 Y ie• N V i •C^N •L VPO C'O'w •_ G O' W V L t 1: C •C- C. ° N M 1 4 11 CV N b U N > 4 H N W V a L L 0 C V d q V 1 C 1•C 1 4tl W•_ �OTO� C O V qy L ❑ EV u � r N� 4C 4� L gNVl NwN .� b O:O N /CJq �NIIV C4 y <�T ) O �V �q O�pC bYlu VCU p b NC d •00 2�6N Vy •Y �••�N ° }l °p u rG V Va.V.. nOnN �T wA ql.v qY ^ q L u V Zq =i1 P i q° C 6 N N W °1 �. r YdY V•Cr VC... U � � ^ q O° 9 F 1Ly q �] ✓ V N V. V= G V G J q y '0' N 4•- O C O F�d�LI1N r C —VNq .tl ° ^ > °J {a�'�aU L6Y wCi O « ^O 6l iM C�CO ✓ ^Oy N>.b Pl •ON Y6 u ^1 l qM qJ N ON�q- 1N Nyd ^u V ^t N L q 4 N VWq \l f:121 •t Nun Y°VV�r `p•'] �O x N•+G N L VN yLL•LT� pVO` U> — FUNUINC Cy —W `ZP Nj: N7` VrC G <A U� qu+ °t <J ivW co- uNV) �j GMi1/) __q'. Y' all NU 9 tF•' yr GV< �d e L...V ^g ... N G✓q•v `.� mw JW «° qy o •_VN O � -v °e. IpWATUP YN- O „N G yxV A ' > P u d yo � i 1`d TquVr S •: � y 4 a l�'7aLCGL•_ C p Q V V r O C .N L C G C PN06 4 A q T ^•N V VL. -[iM lA NY<. VdN p ` V .J WN° PdC p. «EI'q PP« - NV C CN f. y dN VCON T.•- D. PC kiV V Ei •^ C6 LFCN p— PO i 6 5 r VVU a +N Vu ... .•V UU C .. ^C O ry Nqy a ✓• '° AF•••V �^ 4° py 4. ._ ._ W i. L I> V w ... p > d V V N p. ° W° +.N. 1'qV J W 011 w �V •pw' ❑•Ir ^u q C .. C .� r r`^ c Y WOIL 4 R � f-TV Y -Y NO ^Sa WaVPU «O NgUN 6'i °• ` .LV ZG•tl Clj 'T 6P6NNp +UL f/ GC <J:06 C 1-r J V J W CY • q P M � �•- ° i�y =fin Ju v�r�� a uqv ::u�c m q s S•. d V N �v-.r d u'> dNy V.- GUU•_r � L •� _•O N 01[ �qG �P 4 � Lq'_ NTL P L PO V N I -•O W y•C-. N! •� >•NS m c.-- A2L ' '>rW� v.Aq wo.L. `un y °•-. �L`.� .' � c c a AN d6 •e yLr�yQ �i Nu C rV- A9� =OVI EV'N LPOpq >• N y^ CPC LVd 9 °i W i' •W Y/= •V y O q O C W n V - L W d d P C W } u L ^ A qLV Vhf: AV LT N q N Jq !V- V M UV-u L ALVq u F' E r Y' O 9 •-. m N 2 J M n l .r L C, O •_ W •`-. L I N •'_ ^ q° •_ L: 9 9 y y 0 V f% 6 y L > L V P •- O NO+ V dNVf q n g C W Y y d O�•N y i WLtmq +L N L Y l` d .r N A PN O L L _ L,-L � ^ O P 4 C C W q a V u° YL E''yy4F:2 gLOLL SML g LN� P •� L a V> WF i P v Nq ,LO Y_ °i' �'Dn a � �°,� `._• Y' c � -N vlr 4 co LY o°rJ L W C^ J N ,°` Gr-7 NV V�L V 6p> _ L.•. EJ r VVU q +YL N Cc �a .c `.q. Y- L ^.uiN Ij s m.N. WWN sdi 'A1i' um° EadaO ,Gw„ vTN L�•..O°_C�//gL rOr W4yW. � oLV WN` O.O Nr` •OLV OAV 4qV F�NNIq dqL Nr AN p {L� 4G V ^ N 4hO 6P `.r GO •r-. +N G AO�'r L1` `GAL O V LLL GYroIyM eu N_uu = ` p V 4 ro P A � TN L rL G L Eou �N�• 4 •._. 1L N ..Cf _ YO � dnO��rtir O N ? yCOQ t40 NC^ W NN Vuu .r •q-NA Gr YNlO N C•.A i LYn• PLL�V N(�VN _ uNi ` q q NAL 'YGT ror Lu �a LO ' „ OL Y' V AA +`tM PYU Jrt u.•A.P Y' W U dN L N VI � �^ W � 'n N V -� N L r1 V ^•'. N ^ G .•� L E L C y L ? � V f y y ^ -L LiTJ O q + u [i yr LA N V � O u i} `y `• q C° i T � q° A O K •- N N WPB. NVF O n n6 0 O•VW O.ro H > 40•-. �.� _ P •. r U P UO 4P�6Ly A 'V u ?V V.- V^y °IVO r T pU0 .°"N..P'L^ PqE N•-. N L4V « � LTO u`i ^OW rVIN r Q V .. N�V LA W 4 O •• WN VN nVN Y Pu N O O L C PI.- Li• L' °1 V g G T j; L C ° � N r q t G YO1� O W C L J O N ` A r •ti VJ } Y •`� ^ O WN ♦.ter V °V 4VL utau 0. LLghv ••y'NLV',L 6NOL IP V q� a+•N,• P+ GL2 N'qW Nu L rJ m Ir V Q P 6 A h- m •J.I 4 q r la N u Y_ .A4�J M ^ V W YI � C .N .A J W W N LCV A ^ 19 uA '.0 A V T V -O qyy NCd L^ ,IN � CI"I AJ T T• NL�` n uL N O A� Wes. C N u A E O =q'LC UI V L •- V O O O � V h L o.. -o � W L N PA °<• y:, .- ._N �Wnc N ^J L' O � .W,. °_� a �' • 4 IW u - g V A W N _ dP u C m C d V.� L .� S (. N L._ j V [' L .L + J U.•. V Y.. C G W N A q q U J i 9 V L ^ N O O •r W . Y� m^ V •a P W G L P ^ �� •_ G N� L N V _ N � Li A q W u G V U W U r U .•- 1� 9 •'' C v rn d V�VY +AOiitS GIA 4 ... L V L •- V` M W V q � �Ay Oyu V d NPa >•GQ N q q+ r T� 6 N 4� p OL P _L C N Odu_L uVJiyP L �u N _ ��'� ddr} l•WELN Ut LN u q CL 6G dP �.0 �LU roGiL S ` SL Np Zy r. 'A LN 1C.V 'r'LrL UA4 W + °+ U'y 6W W AVM aV0 `uW A dl•. O � • q ` 7A A� E•^9 -y ♦ICJ N¢C 40 V w d u •LWq LCIWrN V^ >� i m V o .+ q N ., c q W v N A a N b PI q •-. q W rn ... u > X W s .� .� r u N 0_ s q N p W}NY.LOL Y� •¢ N UL LNPm P q 0^1 YLoroms= A N L PM >IM U N C I •.• j] CL �WVIVY.NOlI OCO� AP O 6 _V w°.uN Lcu W+� �AY- N u 9a .A.0 LO •-- 4�•G^ ppp °OU�Y >AV NC LV W qL•� AWYJ NPAN ._ +} Vd rA d NN_ y p q o'J � V V L V C J L u A y L y r • P'- A C L G q f0 yl u N V C+ N L W� AO" Cal,V_W Afaum G EiL4+ p y6A � ^m yNdOV P u A V 'uliG A P �> v WGN._ro •� n' '+' y � �'Caacr °uuy °tP cnN a uov o. L.q . -N...q �a ^fi. ° •� 94 e ".P X.n qu NON +6nl_O •CA EL 11'' 2]- ._ Cl Y-q 2.• POY Vr•� J L•-6 4 WgNd > +J• VC O q G ^J „N LL2 rf.c -Ei d rcJP NFL ^IVO �` 'n�N A1. .. VIV qqv W e •.L 4. W 4anV u L_ yo q NVA cdOq rrYVV '".°. "•ry y • ^ Y 2 _ LL C Cuu ` N OLON ^p fl .A + y.0 Y. W d G r A �u V uNlur A i .._ ._ _. � � �� V Y C O _ fi A� L u O O C W N+ i y •-_ O G u y C Y N T •- V U V f b� u tm + W ._ ° � G L] L N L y N v N V d N _ y M N Vc V. n, T.V >'J IlAN .-TUO U•AL i s� m •_qu ° YLALVh G C.� TCP�•J,I ? A dW4u�i NgAVU. MEAT N N qi' C._r WL �•N _�y 1- V'^ N � q q A t L°. r1 y •� I` N� 6� G q N Y u r� O. .�. 0._ N L L Y N �r+ L O + ^I f .. �U N d W O 0 Y• ^ d q0 AO•_ ._ 6.V � CL VU �ylry WEL�W Od q'uLI NU�YN d +L Ld CY6 OJ •-.q qV ymTq J'n 1` T ��L> + LW LCAC uu uVW q O +_q L aP �^ �•_ F; 5 6gAq yNOr C_ L POI ' A O4 AEON L O° lu ❑ y l UW L� dL CL may`^ O Nf=OW N-J ... TN 4� ,J ^r �AO.'L L «�._r O 1y1 �-W L• -.r_Y N N r`1 OAi VPS _ AA P VY Ir_J�F<V Vni•1V N SLOq V: d.••r..L LGrY• OWy•.•U `Y �• V - 7.�VML0 V4 1- ..• -.•:J �LYy VIN O I-�q0 LN „` 6 LC NJ 6,App dC uCQYYJ <o N J OC +O N OV Gj0 � 6V WN W.O+ \ nn� q N �� rl •I 4 V Vl � � I I I 1 W t �. LL u 13 C M L � u q L F O' q O i Lw a Q� r W ^ q 'TAU qr a > a q W �^ Mo a•f 0 Oiy O f. VY N u -N•a N i G F d Nu oc� ac ` q N N L W �CH qa 6 O L aY� ° > > 6 A b L c. 6 A LN W r R V N L L y N m � T c 3 W O u L V P {. L 4 L 6 u �r L O Y rnm ca T� W N q c u fa Y� r d l O C O u R� W V Q O' u u u N d b yu a L d ^ O a N } Y a rn O a` yP. u L ^ N c i o E L O W a N b C N wa L N u W �3 T O Y T O r C i V m O � C 6 q a�J a N ° u q • N r ^ L V O C u L q N G NY l• 6r <�m ` O au va 4 N L � J Y J W > N OI C� VTl° 4 2 N m d N P W c L d u Y N 7 y qryry o L' V L r u• lJ J � V W N W « TJ Wn l 'c Ni pa G L o y e U� ad �• l V{ M 1[� IN L Q r o a L V Y A U C •�Ua O 4. V i •6 N aL W^ ad Y�y « N L 0/ v>i g� ✓ ��.YN Y N W z ` Vj1 L N i l tT N° OAV- ✓L N W Y L L u^ W W' C � V ° G V N d A V V O L, N •.• L IJ W V L N L y- C V V O l 6 «•• {{''�• V Y N a CLLG Lr�NO y U L L �^ G L w x oa° C.y N v o w C v « mo o Ou MY u{ > aY ^ c N uom LO O gV•aL L A a Yu LQTJVW C q 6WmOO C9V6- ^j V L q p L « C u 9 C O •V N W N^ Y ,� Y .. d C c G✓ L � A L V q a u N N O N N (i �J a� d Pv •. L V Lrt • LV u N aL L L 1_ y 3 q u m V up q ✓ NaC ^ q N N N W m � G ]L' r 13 C M L � u q L F O' q O i Lw a Q� r W ^ q 'TAU qr a > a q W �^ Mo a•f 0 Oiy O f. VY N u -N•a N i G F d Nu oc� ac ` q N N L W �CH qa 6 O L aY� ° > > 6 A b L c. 6 A LN W r R V N L L y N m � T c 3 W O u L V P {. L 4 L 6 u �r L O Y rnm ca T� W N q c u fa Y� r d l O C O u R� W V Q O' u u u N d b yu a L d ^ O a N } Y a rn O a` yP. u L ^ N c i o E L O W a N b C N wa L N u W �3 T O Y T O r C i V m O � C 6 q a�J a N ° u q • N r ^ L V O C u L q N G NY l• 6r <�m ` O au va 4 N L � J Y J W > N OI C� VTl° 4 2 N m d N P W c L d u Y N 7 Y rt L v W N 3 n Y a' E `J r a `- A L C ` L_ A Y ` c {4' W ii . 6 N N q o •Y V uy b N O m !: Y W G O C N L c Q L L° C > Lb 4 t c G rn v 0 4 N L Y} � L ° .V. U � N trn O y qryry o L' V L r u• lJ J N W « TJ Wn l 'c Vuc o _. .- V W 0 U� ad �• l 1[� IN Y A U C •�Ua V i •6 aL W^ ad Y�y « N LCOIV O.O� CV ��.YN vqi W z ` Vj1 W K N i W' 4 u � N P T V N d f� U O L, N •.• L IJ W V L N L y- C V V O l 6 «•• {{''�• V Y CLLG Lr�NO �^ q NTJN �L .� ry C.y NCT Y rn Ou r0 aY C uom L= O Yu LQTJVW C q 6WmOO C9V6- ^j V L q p L « 9 C N W N^ Y U Y O N N (i �J a� d Pv •. L V Lrt YbL LV u 4�. aL L L y 3 q u m V up q ✓ NaC ^ q N N N W m � G P r N {J 6a WlT V l 6 q�i a a NY -J m L c V ^ N N L '/� u W ` � a i•� 9 M A q O. V Na +6{r NOOK u a d ^i ^ q N q W l i L ao� W s mb NL bu U N V Y 2 a m a T O a O O V b L SV- gq a N ^ -� C L L :•. oa .� U -- V �r C O a n Lb C 'L ^'N v q V' i d T "N � N qYa _ Yrn a c pc cLw V- q VJ TJ 1 L 4 O C d u �^ L T L v4i G V L a L V a •^'1 L 4 a V O N C" _• C r W l: p .A { Y 1 o ✓o c •^ a � O O. m° o y Nu a 2 {L-ou .+ _ v au O•_ JN NaN.G Lm b O W « 4� a >^ V d� L y L d ' L y a tly' ^� i OY ..0 �� • ._rtL' i= W �-V•Y QGN 6N J2 INY S... �-y aL NN L d Y 6+• j U� yyYm N U� � 1P 10 m p «I 1 Y rt L v W N 3 n Y a' E `J r a `- A L C ` L_ A Y ` c {4' W ii . 6 N N q o •Y V uy b N O m !: Y W G O C N L c Q L L° C > Lb 4 t c G rn v 0 4 N L Y} � L ° .V. U � N trn O y qryry O G L' V L r u• lJ J Q W « TJ Wn l 'c Vuc o _. .- V W 0 U� ad �• l 1[� IN ?ry U C V i •6 aL W^ ad Y�y « N LCOIV O.O� CV ��.YN vqi W z ` Vj1 W K N i J y qryry O G L' V L r u• O Q W « TJ Wn l 'c Vuc o _. .- L G. O P U� ad �• aL W^ ad Y�y « N LCOIV O.O� CV ��.YN vqi aL LVL•Z W V L N L C V V O l 6 «•• {{''�• V Y CLLG Lr�NO VbOVd ya[ut C Vu Ou vNU uom L= O Yu LQTJVW C q 6WmOO C9V6- ^j V L q N W N^ Y U Y O N N (i �J a� d Pv •. L V Lrt YbL � NiL .O._ aWY� 4�. aL L L y �� NaC OTC N yp0 «C N VYNL�• P r N {J 6a WlT V l 6 q�i a a NY -J c V ^ N C� O. V Na +6{r NOOK QV a d J Y d 0 n Ll Ll 11 e •_ 9 I V I3 V W v o� o.','.' upes oZ`a .. c L o�yy_ w V�CO roL w w N „O A N q A uqq N C r V •p rn� p L O ro L V V y q�N qU��C v�9 OI A OVyL�� -O CiL« V W� qo gyVr 6V'O i_ VIM V �O YLO 49 CdA l"'t1q o5 r 9J i 'c°'`n N C y E l .� C Y A 5 '.' O A T � n l ✓ 6yq OO 9 •.C- U VCL_. {. + N T V O W M1 N l _ VVOI�nO �`T rdj�N l''L LAyWa « 1'9 2 T3, cC{ V y�CW U� A�Nm°' roul� Y _ _ OyNO qL CN L�lllOmL OVA 4C. VO TL V nn aG VVp'W L•o m0•_i= al V S Ll Ll 11 CITY OF RA.INCI -10 CUCAtIO \CA STAFF REPO T Liles �-^. -• c DATE: May 27, 1981 U ir�� 1977 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Plauner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLP ILIA MIL VG IRt14I Rv. I I /Jl - UL,LOJLfL"U t,% nu. -..4 - ! total residential developmFnt comprised of 240 condominitim units on 11.5 acres of land wihtin the R -3 zone located on the east side of Archibald Avenue, north of Base- Line Road APN 202 - 181 -12, 21(portion) ABSTRACT: The applicants have submitted a total residential project for the development of a planned development consisting of 240 dwelling units designed around a continuous water element on 11.5 acres of land within the R -3 zone. The project is submitted as a planned development and would be so designated on the Zoning Map upon approval by the City Council. The project has received favorable point ratings to allow consideration of the project by the Planning Commission. The project is now being brought before the Planning Commission for its recommen- dation of approval on the Planned Development designation and approval of the Tentative Tract Map. Resolutions and Conditions of Approval are attached for your review and consideration. BACKGROUND: The project site is generally located on the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Base Line Street (Exhib ?t "A "). As the Commission may recall, a recently approved Parcel Map split the property located on the corner, for purposes of developing a professional office complex and to allow the rear portion to be developed as a residential project. The project consists of 240 dwelling units designed as condo- miniums and placed around a continuous water element: The intent of the development is to provide views and frontage to the water element for each dwelling unit. The site is presently zoned R -3 and is General Planned fo- residential densities at 14 -24 dwelling units per acre. The project is designed at approximately 20 units per acre. The application will require two actions by the Planning Commission; one would be adoption of the attached Resolution which recommends changing the zoning to a Plan - ned.Deveiopment designation, and secondly, approval of the Tentative Tract Map with the recommended conditions of approval. The site is pre- sently undeveloped and contains a chicken ranch which shall be removed with the development of this project. To the east of the project is an existing mobilehome park and areas to the north and south are presently vacant. The railroad boarders the north boundary of the project. ITEM F State Report PD 80 -13 (TT 11797) (2) May 27, 1981 The project has been reviewed under the Growth Management Review process and has received the minimum amount of points necessary 'to allow consi- deration of the project by the Planning Commission. ANALY'IS: The project, as proposed and with the recommended conditions of approval, will meet the provisions of the State Subdivision Map Act, the City Subdivision Ordinance, and the Zoning Ordinance. As was pre- viously mentioned, the concept of development utilizes a continuous water element flowing through the entire project and providing frontage to each dwelling unit. All dwelling units are provided with private patio areas as well as having the ability to utilize the common open space and recreation areas provided throughout the development. Parking is designed as detached carports and oper spaces around the perimeter of the project. The dwelling units .`"e 1 and 2 bedroom. Primary access to the project will be provided by one main entry from Archibaid Avenue which aligns with a proposed street on the west side of Archibald. The internal circulation system is basically a loop system Ah which does not irterupt or separate dwelling units. Since some of the carports and parking spaces are on the opposite side of the driveway from the dwelling units, it is recommended that texturized pathways be provided at appropriate locations throughout the development to desig- nate pedestrian crossings. In addition, it is recommended that the entry way be treated with a texturized pavement to enhance the entry and improve the Special Boulevard treatment. Secondary emergency access will be provided at the southeast corner of the project which will be ultimately tied into the proposed professional center on the south end of the project. Under the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance a multiple family develop- ment is required to provide 2.2 parking spaces per unit, one in a carport or garage and the remaining may be in open spaces. A project of this size would require a minimum of 528 parking spaces to meet the require - ments of the Zoning Ordinance: The project applicant is proposing to provide 1 space in a carport for each dwelling unit, and a balance of 260 open spaces which would provide a total of 500 parking spaces: 28 parking spaces short of the Ordinance requirements. The City Planner has reviewed the relationship of the unit sizes to the parking require- ments and feels that with 96 of the units being less then 700 sq. ft. in size that a minor deviation of 5% would be appropriate in this case. If the Commission concurs with this finding, then a Minor Deviation would, hereby, be granted with the approval of this project. E Staff Report P.D. 80 -13 (TT 11797) (3) flay 27, 1961 The present grading of the site falls in a southeasterly direction. The conceptual grading plan has been approved which indicates an insignificant change in the present grade of the land. Drainage of the site will be taken across the southerly parcel to Base Line Avenue to existing drainage improvements. The project will be required to meet the minimum tree requirement for multiple family projects as established by the Planning Commission, In addition to the landscaping, the project is providing an extensive water element throughout the project area. Attached in the exhibits are some sections indicating the landscape treatment proposal along Archibald Avenue which meets the requirements for a Special Boulevard. The applicant has designed the frontage of Archibald to create a diver- sity in the parking arrangement and pockets of landscaping. It is recommended that dense landscaping be provided around the perimeter of the site for appropriate buffering. There are some existing trees on the site which staff recommends saving. The Design Review Committee has reviewed the architectural desigr of the structures and the design elements of the project. The Design Review Committee gave a favorable rating-of the project contingent upon final approval of the composition shingle roof by the City Planner. The theme of the project is to provide a woodsy appearance with simulated masonite shingle siding and composition shingle roofing. Colored exhibits and displays will be available for the Planning Commissions review and consideration during the meeting. The number of trash enclosures provided throughout the development will not meet the needs of the total project and additional enclosures will be required. As these enclosures are being proposed adjacent to the carports, it is recommended that these enclosures be designed with an overhead shade sheltev for heat reduction. Details of the trash enclosures and the overhead structure shall be included in the final building plans for review and approval by the City Planner. Part I of the Initial Study as provided by the applicant is attached for your review. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study and a field investigation to determine significant adverse impacts that may result from this project. Upon completion of this study, no significant adverse impacts were found as a result of this project based upon the conditions of approval recommended. Therefore, Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration for this project. lu Staff Report PD 80 -13 (TT 11797) (4) May 27, 1981 CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Daily Report Newspaper and property owners within 300 feet of the project boundaries were notified by mail of this hearing. To date, no corres- pondence has been received for this project. RECO11MENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a puc hearing to consider public input on the project. If, after such bli consideration, the Commission concurs with the findings and conditions of approval recommended, then the adoption of the attached Resoluiton and Conditions of Approval would be appropriate. RespXctfully submitted, ARR- /HOGAN ity.' planner BKH:MV:cd V Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "D" - Sections Exhibit "c' - Grading Plan Exhibit "F" - Tract Map Exhibit "G " - "M" - Elevations Part I - Initial Study Resolution for P.D. designation Resolution for Tentative Tract l.J i •'L l '3 II�L T +1.. +rbl+ol•I�rs•IT o�InJ Ir L!;i4 a, � ry�rTaS^i9 ai �wMrFe ala�vb� 7'r 1 `or till M r 1 � � �•V��P ,' r fL +'y' r Lij L:: LY • I • 1 I 1 i f 1 N � 1 M r 1 � � �•V��P ,' r fL +'y' r Lij L:: LY • I • 1 I 1 i f I •IYeWN�/u10.I1HN.f01 P I��A • — .............. .__ 1 < j � W r as •J. •ai t/rrr , 1 ` J W . !llri � a= a a :e•e:a; w - �•' 1 1� 111J L�� I j -�1� �h LLU.Ii_. �jl 111'f:Njr�}I' r ....Y �.. .. _ _Y .M .h_ .:L.rr�i.`rr'ri• i f >. _� .d _ �+�r.� t, r { Q:'. • I P-NOW—W,71-3 —&age ill't -MiM f 61 wo Ills t tis 5k -SIRS l".. n 6. . Y Z O• + CL a Z l —� IWT Oil a i it 9 4'•'1f i � r � I / � :gin • +� � It Ll Ll n ' +' JJ i 1 4�• -�'.` tr. to q� i t u Gli ale Li T' '• 8 vs /�'' l..- �J —_._ • if I � � : +"may ty, a. JA 0 l' { " I I �� - - =.fir =� -'I � �•_ . ; 'tiYI.ML.y� . ^_�•�l_�^" -L�1� wil�� •/ 1! ! .. - -J �'1l1�1 rr 6 a t FA I 6v y. �n �o z x 0 e W W ¢ F • Z O k i • t 1 FA I 6v y. �n �o z x 0 e W W ¢ F • Z O k i • t w \. W r r H i Z O K W J W D Z W A W 6 Y F Z 7 Z G W J W O Z W w w ®' 70 1 a �• Y M• t � 2 l .7 O f L W J W H O Q W �i a , "A f: 1' n,• ♦ i f i i� �jjII 7 I ' 1 f a , "A f: 1' n,• � e1 � /h -; yV'. �� ' �� ✓� , 1. if ' ,, (: �fY+ � V 1, 'r 1" a , "A f: 1' n,• 1' 1 1 ,' y• V �' ( �Y I I I �� .FYI `. �. ( 1 1 r• M1 .• � .� F �'x I�il � �I 1 . l 'l. 1 � a P•i!+• ylPtt::Yttt 'i 11 �� r•• +'�r iii , � •'� Y! y• r \�I� 1 j k♦ •, h iii 1'' � , , t�i"c�3�•' vY � / ROM rill, ■ ^ ! `t. a' 1 Ail 1•� :y � 1 1 i ,1 r 1� n_•1 r 1 rrl[. }r!'�'_`.', d1 �':; i`r',i`ir it -•rr i� r'j•r � ::-: • � t '/ �/ ;._ ;�' .; ,. -_:.. �. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental A.ssesement Review Fee: $80.00 .,o For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, t-ae Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of th? Initial. Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the Project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will Le filed, 2) The project will have an environmental :snpact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Unnamed APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE :Diversified Investment Company, 270 So. Bristol Street, Suite 201, Costa Mesa, NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE UP PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Jack Tarr, 270 S. Bristol Street,_ uite 201. Costa Mesa California 2526 LOCATION OF ^ ROJECT (STREET A, +DRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL No,) 9738 _ Baseline Road, as Corner of Are- -hl ba_" a and Rasp line, APN #202 - 181 -12, 21, 22 LIST OTHER. PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, -41TE AND FEDERAL AGLJCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: I 'I • �I'. II 1 �'I f 1 J 1 1 PI li I' S � .1 1 � J w^ I , I 1• 1. . �: � ••a' .5.� ' 1'. I'I 1 I"I1�1' 'I 1..1�f :I I 1.1' S PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Sixteen acre planned commercial development including of i.ce, -inanci.a restaurant and multi - famioy residential ACPXAGE OF PROJECT APEA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: Sixteen. acres DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL, SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS)= ana scrungrass growa.ng on sire. -mere is an exxsrxnq chicken ranch on site with anc Aliary storage and one AMh single family dwelling unti, There are no cultural, historical or scenic aspects which will be significantly affected. Existing animals include mice, pocket gophers and ground _ squirrels. Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series- of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? No E 11 Y_ 2 WILL THIS PROTECT: YES 140 X 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? _ X— 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or gc!neral pl.ao. des5c-natinns? X 5: Remove any existing trees? How many? 30 X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: 5. Existing abandoned fruit and misgg} }.laneo}�Qes on s Count is approximation. IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential un..ts, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furi.ished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation Li the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information prezented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief- I further understand tln t additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Development Review Committee- Date / / 2�� Signature Title Qe�- r.. -,.Xli A: Z - -3 tr RESIDEIITIAL CONSTRUCTION The follotiiing information should. be provided to the City of Rancno Cucamonga Planning Division in order to zid in assessing the aba.lity of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: D °.versified Investmx nt COmpz.y Specific Location of Project: NI-C Archibald and Baseline 1. Number of single { family units: 12. Number of multiple family units: 3. Date proposed to gin construction: 4. Earliest ate of occc�ar.cy- Model and ` of Tentative .5. Bedroeris Price Rance A 1 Bdr. 88 B 1 Bdr. 32 C 2 Bdr_ 72 D 2 Bdr. 48 Im PRASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASF 4 _N /A N/A N/A N/A 60 60 60 60 6/l/81 5/1/82 1/1/83 8/1/83 . 4/1/82 3/1/83 10/1/83 .3/1/84 $48,000 53,000 66,000 80,000 .I.... .. .fi TOI AL N/A 240 RESID' ?37*IAL CONSTRUCTION T, a foll.owiny information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to acco-.unodaY_e the proposed residential development. 111ame of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Diiversified Invcstnr�t Comti3ny_ Specific Location of Project: NEC Arc'iibald and Baseline PHASE I PHASE 2 1, Nurincr of single far,':ly units: N/A NIP, 2. Nun ber of multiple $48,000 family units: 60 3. Date proposed to 72 661000 _air. construction: 6/1/81 S. Earliest date of occupancy: 4/1/82 Model 4 ' and L of Tentative 5. Aed_-oo:ns Price Rance PHASE 3 PI'.AS,; 4 TO;1 L N/A N/A N/A 60 60 60 5/1/82 1/1/83 8/1/83 . 3/1/83 10/1/83 .311/84 A 1 Bdr. 88 $48,000 g I Bdr- 32 53,000 C 2 Hdr_ 72 661000 D 2 Ddr- 48 80,000 240 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNED DEVELOPMIAT NO. 80 -13 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE ZOMING FROM R -3 TO R- 3 /P.0. FOR 11.5 ACRES LOCATED GENERALLY ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD & BASE LINE. WHEREAS, on the 30th day of December, 1980, an application was filed and accepted on the above described project; and WHEREAS, on the 27th day of May, 1981, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of t' California Government Codp. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following' indings: 11 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed zone in terms of access, size, and zompatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; 2. The proposed zone change would not have significan;, impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and 3. That the proposed zone change is in conformance with the existing and proposed General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this projer_t will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on May 27, 1981. NOIA, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: I. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 55855 of the California Goverrment Code, that the Planning Commission of `he City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 27th day of May, 1981, Plamted Development No. 80 -13. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Pla coed Development No. 80 -13. 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF MAY, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO C'- �,AMONGA is K... .... �. a. .. .: ^.f!!^��.��5....� .... .�..... �.. ... ... .. .. . .. -. .. n .�. .' -�. ... -� �:.. �. �+,• s.... ...— .�T.W.A.M.T,M..�.MY.w�'Y1Y' I] Ll 1�A � Resolution No. Page 2 BY: Richard Dahl, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK. LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and :%!guiarly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of May, 1981 by the following tote to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 11797 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 11797, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Diversified Investments, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as 11.5 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Archibald & Ease Line into 5 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action or. May 27, 1981; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hear?ng. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planninq Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard 'io Tentative Tract No. 11797 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development p;- oposed; (d) 'ihe design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable inju,•y to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) the tentative tract is rct likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. all 11 �{4... I W ,] 11 11 E Ll v Resolution No. Page 2 (g) That this project will not create alverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 11797, a copy of whi attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. Dense landscaping shall be provided along the north, south and east property lines. 2. A sample of the roof material shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Additional trash enclosures shall be provided throughout the development and shall be provided with shady shelters. 4. A minor deviation of 26 parking sialls is approved. 5. Texturized or enriched paving shall be provided at the main entry to the development. ENGINEERING DIVISION 6. Widening of east side of Archibald Avenue with A.C. pavement to provide for two through lanes and half width median from south project voundary to Base Line Avenue shall be required. 7. Tentative Parcel Map No. 6651 shall be recorded prior to issuance of any building permit. APPROVED AND ADOPIED THIS 27TH DAY OF MAY, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF TH. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Richard Dahl, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planniag Commission Resolution No. Page 3 I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Reso'ution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting oP t;ie Planning Commission held on the 27th day of May, 1981 5y the followirg vote to- wit: AYES: NOES: ABSFNi: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: L1. 11 2 n a 1" n. L G n• n v n in 0 ;h i N •� b Y vJ r O P ^ O In m u n t l o N¢ Y 1 a O `ftil a N O U �l w /r. f'ir O 7 1 C� F a m N C• r C ni 6 J ^ � I •arn -� o a L Nm �W i R r in C ZI N TAI i u 0 N c V N Y o O v G 5 f: rn Y M Y S � N b Wo N`b ry uG ry L O s w P Wl. b �c a G N N a ^Ln CO P G p w Q� 8= ° G per p. o .gym nr a. c o n C r w a « ° � C c c n N o °- m F .L` C vPS WET "cm =b� LDC NcrJ n m A um� N° .TL r 7 `^oc W lT r m •� na N m y o F° Rv m G w� ^. r C N~ n v > N m n t o aN r'NN n o r _ N r L n ^G V �n m ufi 6 N 'D a c�+NUr ..N NN Lc n D L y �vi0 � c c m� oc N a �R z� � E o c T � C Y^ � 4 P Y 1 1 N . N Y Td {o 6 O N C rt ^s a =emu p � c t _ Y m;r N R W Nr.^ m � N a [ S p`uL .p L yM1 o QL ^• u•v- �a. a �a ° N C O 4 Oi N Y.N.. •NU ° C ° D n G c b r J O N r Y N 4. L .. e� m �^ N ^ m _n G Z ` v L ° � o N c 0 « q N m W V = n s .. q D m H 4 p� .i E N N �° O N tic Nnr Nm N ... N rnn 'um� b« me � w a��o 0 ° N =o NC c WO it `C OL Y NN n•°n r.1 c •., x NF 35n n _oy voo_ P 1 o O• c •.. r Y '^ ^..0 V n N or r NF N G � � r r° boo° G X CU .0 =wSAOr O P crc r r� rS. G � DNl.�JG yQ ��_ CLY• E:m NDm cuY ??m •_c °'s a i d °• y n m v N d —a C °'r P P Nb - G r•NA Nf•1 9 K �^ J_ Id :(�tl00 Ni° ag m> nr cN r n N > .... .. ° N R m f ? •. � P T y. Y'm FN�wGC O 6 O N C rt ^s a =emu p � c t _ Y m;r N R W Nr.^ m � N a [ S p`uL .p L yM1 o QL ^• u•v- �a. a �a ° N C O 4 Oi N Y.N.. •NU ° C ° D n G c b r J O N r Y N 4. L .. e� m �^ N ^ m _n G Z ` v L ° � o N c 0 « q N m W V = n s .. q D m H 4 p� .i E N N �° O N tic Nnr Nm N ... N � 6 N � w 6 O N C rt ^s a =emu p � c t _ Y m;r N R W Nr.^ m � N a [ S p`uL .p L yM1 o QL ^• u•v- �a. a �a ° N C O 4 Oi N Y.N.. •NU ° C ° D n G c b r J O N r Y N 4. L .. e� m �^ N ^ m _n G Z ` v L ° � o N c 0 « q N m W V = n s .. q D m H 4 p� .i E N N �° O N tic Nnr Nm N ... 7 .a � CFOp �'° as NyL w a��o • ° N =o NC c WO it `C OL Y NN n•°n r.1 c •., x NF 35n c o.., n ,� W yN n N N G � � r r° boo° G X CU .0 =wSAOr O P crc r r� rS. G � DNl.�JG yQ ��_ CLY• •..' d —a C °'r P P C C Nf•1 9 K °b P Id :(�tl00 Ni° .... .. ° n C .n f Q � •. � P T y. FN�wGC O 6 r y W G •-• C O1 N W O �• �u a n _ L O c p r u ° r r 1O = D 1. � S N •De nF a' p D iO nn AN %m C ua °i.a T a an •°! rCJia` G yr ^mot O1 PNF N � C � rc D O .• •C N O N Pn c ° °pQP •. _ a N � i 4 6 O N C rt ^s a =emu p � c t _ Y m;r N R W Nr.^ m � N a [ S p`uL .p L yM1 o QL ^• u•v- �a. a �a ° N C O 4 Oi N Y.N.. •NU ° C ° D n G c b r J O N r Y N 4. L .. e� m �^ N ^ m _n G Z ` v L ° � o N c 0 « q N m W V = n s .. q D m H 4 p� .i E N N �° O N F °^ �• ^ O °` f N ... 7 r N N N nl N NyL w ° N =o NC c ono W �•-�r' m 35n NG c'° c^O'.n NI °a .°.� ,� W yN n N G � � P N = O N °1 C G X CU .0 =wSAOr O r� rS. G � DNl.�JG A. •O sf: 4. ��_ CLY• d P P C C Nf•1 9 K °b P Id :(�tl00 Ni° Yr' a FN�wGC O 6 r y W G •-• C O1 N W O �• �u a n _ L O c p r u ° r r 1O = D 1. � S N •De AN �w ua °i.a T a an •°! rCJia` G yr ^mot O1 PNF N � C � rc D O .• •C N O N In f� wN �W.tir ..•�nr.Y �W DNY,r r.r rW'9 it -`, om'a9 „y 'vb a oa�2i iN.T � � r r .v ` O N^ i Y __ dr. � 6 J P N J 6 r D r^. Y W N 'u y � N A•L r n b N Gj 6 r n � a' 'C 4 n� N m T •n N q J W r 7 r � C L V r; j r � O� r. i' T„ O 7 p. O p tC W ^ N N � r 4 w C fYi O W N .^1r 4� 0• 4 a g N �• 4 w w W� O J O � rvJ N � N N fJf O N >rl H w6 NN JYy'JNA�NF u< NUrzr.. J, J, �N NJ� 10 W tv T ^ O .O wrWfp vY NN wi6 N..'tn O u N ms —.W.J ^.nNe. w� 'J JN tn4r �r >9 Oran NSW oa OANr Nr'T ` •-' ^ ANN N y^ r r. W _. N r y^ .Ji r A ry N w� q r O> > O J N< O 6 •.. P N 4 Y P N n r N �D fJ TG jr N P'fw, A .N A .O W N L r <iy r, p N j of roJ n' j �, •_ ....+ nm�� 4a JJ NN b o N b o o.:o�< Po �N p°. 'n orb .o r•5 �” eP r.a CAb ry J N W r• N N- W y J J q l V r W b U l 'J O J r b; C. J t r l Y] M G. J J � r .r 'J N r ..• �' n O J O. Nl J 4 'J W6 �l �rr^. ib N.wi.W +. SN 6N LL'r V. .011 Y� O'l 09JN N 4 q NNb W ^ r JC r.�4w�� ` N i b'pI 4WYWf�fJ Yw p Y O' O r OJ dj4 qb �.�r ,C 6q Wj fJn NrOr P9N6n4 Ow•• `��Y�' Nn N S C( l6 P NO r 'PnWO�rT qJ ip W^ N 4J N � r Nv. IY N .0 .. W S W r O t O J U ryry N � J W p Y.1 N^ u J 4 G n fJl Y N Y 4 r(f N N NI y T NON N J �d�r_ •�•3 r (1 Y O W � rN ^T�ri LLb Wn r V D'^ Yu JAY N TtN<n' NW ry 6w b NJ J S ^ W w i W r IT O r. Y fl J W O w• N w O '• O 'I r 0 0 W W Jl Oqv JrN PrJ 4A N v0 NfNb .ONIp^i r. Nr Nq ^nl 'fD T ON T N l4Oti �1 =� 10 N O4VUNN0 !Z O• Y 9 4 J N r •v _ r y O b b J O r N Y Y <_ l ^+ N P A 6r Op� p� o m d �' r a Oq WN W ON OOJY _'d rN O g bJ u. esy n�'l<rbC p°. N.. �'' Yi O' ^r J• G wW 6^ N=• c.o w n J r°J rYa NfO 's' i wY_ J•G� ONE ^Nry NG _ 'r T W W = l O r Y p. OC � O n n NC wOOrt1 J � TJ W >wW � � bNW r.0 q_l v], u 6 0 .p J �• O N J' VJ N A p O J Yv S� W w u W a n Y L O � V� r• C bd... � T ^ O O n '�� N J W i^ q J O . W r 60W �A.ON yN 00 V•. YS� Yl Nnn NV •LJO^ EY TJ P .. G n.t + D r <.'J 1 's N T Y N O na i u w JO r • o 4Ci rZti mWC vC .J w ^N AS Nay _NJ�o N� r o D.`. .°.•.W. nJ J JN nro <a o :o r. `I `. ub W `�" O i c wNn ni �r.O _. .,: of � °' j >>o' . O4N w O N' � O N r A lNi r w b n» d n r T N Orr. T J J _. b O N a fl A W 6 W r Y _. N r O q JS Y tl O •-t ^ A A 4 J N< r j� b 4 J J r. O• O r b 0 4=' = N G uni 0 4 V, p• r� W � Y� e'bv N 4 � _.•G _.O O Gu ry N r.b TO'4f r• �N b_ n b_ < � y. NJ :J , .'N N byp WOrb;n TW ^W 14 YNY C.uG � r N N .b NOO U' N� Jam_^ _ b.p� a 0 O T n ar'B ip J ` i 1 N LL J 7 O�LL u4i iG2 n O J ^UJ P N S OZC b�.N qv n �` p •V =N N yI WnO N O� j S� J n N ti W N � `J ; •N� J O W J C O � W N` V r. A T TPNW SNN(J J LY 41 O rS4 n� ^ "" •" rr j.T Oy^ t03:' •T '<QS 3 C 0 n J 0 N O d q V N N n n W N 0 0 4 N N N N N P� v�.0 � 1p OY �. ,D• �nQj 9 b^ .<•.N aJ BUS F �NA �o �rt� W `� J °o o W o <w �;p -. 'O N -• Jv ar N �y VY NO NN 4fr}bT r .ON O nONn>fDNJ O NPRw l� 4'Y V V YJ OA1 r4N OW �' T W<d9C W N .O t..V r OW b l j <Ni v' bJ rNOr VIrJ 4 in rN • W yT�6nS �.] >• 'O^ nW �O M O O �O br T n r J �N rN ^vG y[3• Y P fY� y�0 N P yN . TO _. � d.`w ^n � ^ o r bb _NP >•�.a w W W N N n ..O T 'A Y N nl W N O i O al q n NO O N vG• v i. i..An °" _. � 0 �. °' r n b u °. N r a 4 n >• � J ury SIO rC n�; r.0 O r YS tWl • q0 J �^ rW •J_n1 VO O 4 9S T?1 Y q y 6 <q H q q t I .1 1 •. a E O n O ' T IN i O � '� K" _ n • J O• N 6 W • Cl •-119 10 6h GM Oi rNi 79a OSG c OryN d9 RPR<V MNNT O•JCr y Ot+ O NN Jr �� ^ Ini.r :IN r l S tij. nb•=ii rV yl '� 3: HH SSb� _ �} V •)r S p �<N ~S N�IC�SN S W n L� r ^ i N O q r N^ N O r�.N l r1 r 'Y n[ N n W b� R 6 < T w l y_ N G U •n O r H r. q V 0 ` N P u •Fj O Y .' N O r r. Y .r G ° 4 �4} O b V i'. n n •O P J N Y i 6 f O i N = Y l 1 -1 F 3 w+ 9 'J N r w O• H L J w 7 b r Z O .• � S= °� �° T 4 �A � � Y r .F•. T� J u w 9 YT, %�� • n r. H� 9 O� N L y T l N W� 9 N N� ^ 1 O 4 �• N N l = N 2 N 4 h W �T '� l r S l W N 6< W w fl C b N N n N m b VJ G N J J T �. f1 r. 'J' �' 6 3 W _ V r. p•1 W N 6 w J rr j 1C J JN 1q NHL .. N H9 P O w N WN H S U n•' _ N ° q ^ynJ Wp ^ J 1n� z c• o nW l A' 4VroeJ J1N) P ^n �=' �° •• �>' <•rrlao Ta 3r.K _ �b mN l9 QiY J o F� r T� (SW H o yuwiWP o.•.V f. No1JG T. �c'f Nwi. J•rR= O +W9rf -9 a OJJµ .'r :l N • ' j N .j 9 � a %1 N� a � r n J w w �� •1 J' � l0 N� n w 6 i _'. Ir^f. 4 10 6 3 H U Y 6 R !ap 1"1 O W J r N n .••• it. 99 6 1p �• O r. N HN 1J p ^ J t2 51 l N 6 _ S C J 1 7 b H T90L)N ^ _ ry 6 N n r C fJ 10 N 1< T W N N Y• J V W l J N 6 i K C N 01 a •n � Nr w p9O T K�106 r y -4 ZZ Qr F O6� J��LWn 'CI /� N VOIW J9NC ply l J N •q O .' T. - .. l N 10 {9 nn+ b �(9i r4 N•O ?.Ci — Q jV1�F 1Y �^ r•r' O 1 0 6�ww S OSN •'1 WY 1i"]9_S1°.rIRJ NS N COO 9N+ 6j� JRR r =ter Nr. r 1^ _ R S'_ti N)«wO l N° < _ W `/) C S N n Y i n •O Y' • T 1 N 10 N u y Y i N 6 W -wi H N N W^ N l g J; r el N. a r. C 4O OS 7.` S l wl RJ ° N H1 NW NN V O q = O 1p �N r=i l SJ STL W HJ �O� r... � °Y Rn � nrn� � . � FSn nle c _: �fll -�h oeT. .'• J HH n. +� � W Y'N^ :.I =, �Y3 �j,� r•. =0 yp �l N J r.•O rin TNfJ) n ^ l HNm iRr.p N =N N J r Nm CrFl _ �= aK 1 ^Chn _ •r�C.^ =NNn r.0'J NNJ6 VO ^ r ; Ynq•N<:]r H 1f T10n H � n OYI H•'ll VOyHd11 b m r N J • A N C l •� °^ J b J 5? r. g w 9 N + H O �t � R.l N n w 6 r O W. J' 6 � ° ^= o� m N w w r °_ � N O • v 1 l J W N 1 N d+ r y � �] l H 4 •T+^ S r. uKi l e y r r. O � b ^°� O J r O� N G i= ry 6 = J J W6 G) �. =4 +•J � OSrM ) n �l NHrr J NKK NNO qr• N N O YY 6 N � f•QH KU N_ J?. W 4 � • K, lJ NR N a<ry SJ w O 22 ro fs d a o•m N Nx miff Nr O ^'�) � .a n > W „ NL9 •-1 Wb vl y+. nFm N6 ° �� N LLn 6 r W QRN 11'fO� nW.rd N; r i C O N O r .'J nOYi OTC � <` 6 wl N':J VO ON IO llp lbr y^� O 0j 7 ,�S1T 3 -ni°ON N. O41 wN .f)� e11O •n �l�O Nq O• I. n b ZY NINA jO 62N }JPq Q NrK 4Jq HW (9 yf1T n I d =- r n 1 vSiV a.P. N •+ +b by nib N Nf<)9 Li 1 pN N•. WO l -q l IO 6 6W q�l 10JRr 2L �J9<R H u S _ OH N m w060Wy qfJ Ja n) °' o c;Y H br� �N 69 T J N• w n � P m ^ NJ. lmD .1° H ... . =11RU> °n NVI r ; Y• 11w oNe a� 5,a2c C N N NN Im l40 l�n O'�4W w SON hN +.° b T l6i lRN n� Wwb '• 1^qf �° J< qc n Ig � Sw wr r.= N W a RR4 b') � SAN..• LL� NnN w r iNKN 6 N r J C n ^'• O r S, •� �. ! J W S 9 V n � 1O N r r O? O 1 1ny y ry "• » % n T r• l V O H N Ip N J •+ .Nr r R •aJNt n6F wnW N N b V ^•14 all N _ n o oo`a °9 W_'W - =ia �...° oPr Fn'10 f]m n��. w Fm 'ry j"•o � fds .N m'au � v`° o'.W.� l ... J Nr K wn fT .q HNN ? PWGWN JnN ml�. t+ P^ �N R N� <•vN H r WW N.�.G iM1 L" �l NY. <...•J W f<) <6N V'YS JV6 OI N< 6N `N• TrN rHb r '••'V O' nl SK WN =UO NOS i�S ^W,V 10 OT T 1^ n°= 1LUCP N�n S 1pNH 00' �.O �N YINI "� A 10 N� n n1'Y '•«•• N n •JN - i �_ a ? 0 3'- ° � W � ° s J � Wm,•sn 3� =�.N.1` r NH m om � iw'c F r r.o Y°c. anW O.b Sr 4J6= N.. ..O �f'� N r dr a On N; � �6O•WJ UN1Y _l NJWNI NR NYC l >OZ •d I.h W = N K W n I^•1 J b N N< v N r. c A N s H l K H :1 r '^ K J i solo ] Nn)'JT l n�rl°.' O l 4 Y 6 n r "' o ` a: '• .N .l. y.m� `1 'H oN ?•_„ m °,n <Re N bn m qaN ido 1O ° 1�° m .N. 2 �-F.1 l •1 R N 1n W min � ^ r. o N n � W i ry V J �Z•. 7 Y. r q � m u r N l q • � F l O n � �. < Q U O N O •f ti N l O N n W '1 .l•. r J N N= �• l r F N o �' m q v �� Q a • °. =w.+ 10 '11 H SH > pn 1°mo 1°L cam.. �anfni � Ll �Q W�FJ q Id ��• N i��I JO wF y N' pr� .. ' � H= r N J •O • q� w n E O n O Q :II V � V` J• W' N O d y n O O j 4 , �N x = S N V ti m„ 1 r o , �w d N a oY^. � r 9^ � J K o• a o� +N r wJ a^ 6 � 6 ] p•O N C p rrgL A O N i N Y m r aq p N P 0 N u n O N r , 10 e n •qj r. n K C N �q - a nN Y S � r N � l 6l ^ C a fl 6 aC O 4] N N Nq° lj n w 0 O r J 4 n b w c - ^0 �r w ] n ]N YJ We V u�, mu r r a. r N q M ] G. m � 6 �C N ] n < i • N P 6 is w 9 ^ O N q O ^ , N M N .p m ° 9 0 O 4 a � P C `N p N IO o n J R O N � 0 - N L. Np6 1 O n �A N ;I K 1 �a J n m d OI l 6 o , ,d d n rvw ,q oO6 ti I]p I ^� Ja • n �a �N11u 969 r �9n w � v jw9 ffb -.. O•a.N V• d9 it _ d • •. N aG jN; � .-.STN K Cwwq .ni.V �dN r 6 ,9. � � n ° NN r °.�• Sri �b wnn 9 O ;m a b o• N f O h O p `O I,Y q 9 j N T G 9 b� •O N O 9 �.SV rn N • O•y ^y �N9 _ G N^ ^^ ,mod .p 4•�° ° ••N K T ]Wyn` S] VO �.�.• 1 �• l 09 30 n O•rr46 NV �. i'! 69 n9 orvor,� 06� K v °i• 0 im i A O ry N r: N •FN w �� 1TK N N°' rr°i 6 �� d n.= .•. T O u^i NJ au0 � r PIY W� Oa=CJ j .0 i N l Y] nn l ga v` wNa j IVS _S c O.r nOd'O d N n m n �, �• W r N� o• x� m° a n o v r a ° ;J NM T.• .5 .. n,KN N K�TT6 Ow4 � d c O d rK 'J Q n •N• C qi w� p �mj f1n l l wq YJ N } p g°t v nn K v u0• .•. 6• OOIN 1q U NOV]r� +K °�� N 70 +r 4ln 99.. d Tn r0 . w r a 90 A +TYC'• J�TI Ip,m L N R rp e• n l• O ^14 d T7 g010 p N100 r s �O �90N ,PS N ql,V Iv N. jw N,N µ ^•� r „ flw 6lum. G L1 n V •'� 9 °J n q .•A �b le n OOw W p 07 N o � �• qOw ^vN r. lO p a N ^ N � ^y p V` J• W' N O d y n O O j 4 , �N x = S N V ti m„ 1 r o , �w d N a oY^. � r 9^ � J K o• a o� +N r wJ a^ 6 � 6 ] p•O N C p rrgL A O N i N Y m r aq p N P 0 N u n O N r , 10 e n •qj r. n K C N �q - a nN Y S � r N � l 6l ^ C a fl 6 aC O 4] N N Nq° lj n w 0 O r J 4 n b w c - ^0 �r w ] n ]N YJ We V u�, mu r r a. r N q M ] G. m � 6 �C N ] n < i • N P 6 is w 9 ^ O N q O ^ , N M N .p m ° 9 0 O 4 a � P C `N p N IO o n J R O N � 0 - N L. Np6 1 O n �A N ;I K 1 �a J n m d OI l 6 o , ,d d n IW IN rvw ,q oO6 ti I]p I ^� L N•; �a �N11u 969 r AP O _ a T 1 � 4 N I,O rn P N N C° � N iJ.n •n ,9. � � n ° NN r °.�• Sri �b wnn 9 O ;m a b o• � pn . nl � ...• TI... • ^ N b ^ _ G N^ O 4•�° ° ••N K T ^^G �• f y� e pJ 1 �• l 09 30 n mm� N O rn 10 IPJ K v °i• 0 im 6e0. A IW IN rvw ,q oO6 I]p I ^� N6^ N•; �a �N11u 969 O O• d 1 � 4 N I,O P N N C° iJ.n •n ,9. � � n ° NN r °.�• Sri �b wnn NN ;m a b o• � pn N � ...• TI... • ^ N b ^ _ G N^ 4•�° ° ••N K T ^^G �• f y� e pJ 1 �• l 09 30 n mm� N O rn 10 IPJ K v °i• im 6e0. O ry N r: N •FN w �� 1TK N N°' rr°i 6 �� Oryry _b«. O au0 �.bN �ATN PIY W� Oa=CJ p q nn l °� v` wNa j IVS _S c O.r nOd'O d N n IN- �• ,L qi p N } p t C 7 u0• .•. B• S , r N N r 99.. 90 A .• R rp e• n O �. �.• G1� p T O r i I°C j N Y` r „ flw 6lum. G L1 n V •'� 9 °J n q `V �b le N .wi. � aC T 9 N � �• ^y p Tm � CN^l y N Lew N 4 ej ` N O b r O IW IN , A n n N a w A .d. pr I O O N. , � n d N � d r w9 0 Yl j N 6 =x a" m r Y. v m iD a , w , 9 P N TN N U n n `t O b w G N •� qw. l ? d n O 'J.•�b r O S w T N N N rTr p n eT. mwa Nw0 a >>o c , , N T pO waOi. TS\ nN o dK N N O b J O N ] T'O JSW w N 'J C N q 7 6 p VOi U N N C �Rq 9 n + t°l q •'• N w , N _ a(� N p � �� .1I LA n.19 d � N n w N , u m° n O N � p o O m n a_ 6 n , O N N m a ro , 6 W N W m w p J N d u w r N R • q 9 z O. R g r n 0 N 6 N W A a0.. n rvw ,q oO6 I]p I ^� N6^ N•; �a �N11u 969 O O• d 1 � 4 N I,O P N N C° iJ.n •n ,9. � � n ° NN r °.�• •1•N d wS NN � pn N � ...• TI... • ^ N b ^ _ G N^ 4•�° ° a J �• Po 9ci .dT. n V• n N ,n P N°' n N Y ]v au0 �ATN O •O on ry p q O :] l n j c nOd'O d N n IN- �• ,L qi p 90 a R rp O � p b p o , A n n N a w A .d. pr I O O N. , � n d N � d r w9 0 Yl j N 6 =x a" m r Y. v m iD a , w , 9 P N TN N U n n `t O b w G N •� qw. l ? d n O 'J.•�b r O S w T N N N rTr p n eT. mwa Nw0 a >>o c , , N T pO waOi. TS\ nN o dK N N O b J O N ] T'O JSW w N 'J C N q 7 6 p VOi U N N C �Rq 9 n + t°l q •'• N w , N _ a(� N p � �� .1I LA n.19 d � N n w N , u m° n O N � p o O m n a_ 6 n , O N N m a ro , 6 W N W m w p J N d u w r N R • q 9 z O. R g r n 0 N 6 N W A a0.. n u C F1� .. • OI VI O tJ N -•� o--Irc O9 V,1 wy I° �r A 40 a^ O rN 40 CW ^W r rJ+e+4 m i1 n °•v aT O b ..m 6 r .{� �•�o' o....N$ �° owe °• , omn'� J Orv�b?� vrvi N J..S �J.7.J6 ip� pl +J d rvf Iy N � Qy 6•.0 W r. r W CI .N..• r O O S 'S T O y j �, , Io u• S a TI1 � ONr�r N s i WJ u �O .� o r o•r ,. pT�� .. Wam� v•n N W ur.�. ISO ^ t° J = on�= 99 mC, IC fl �,sy6 1 N O • r d t nliN a � ry Ot 4TJ y y.Oi•O Vyt .r''yrj • . J 6 4� y r j« 0. ,,^ A Nj1 ry rySry� 3 IlN rr «O SSw r�rC T ,rte O N�i6 ' a rJ 4 N qr O. rN O i 10 n r} m w14 o �NO J •. i u .emu � m's= 4S.•l �O • :J !Nil �} }� � r N r�..T cg °ry r0 n f16 N r uai rypY b �K r r � 6 a N « p ^ .. O 1 40. w O A on ma r '.� �•�o' io N-•i N , omn'� J Orv�b?� vrvi N J..S �J.7.J6 SO NG pl +J d rvf Iy d^ , OJYW N zN ,•O 'S ¢. WN, y j �, , Io u• S a � a _ ti •u • . J 6 4� y r j« 0. ,,^ A rySry� ^ •N d a rN HT ;7 J •. N o• � a O 4S.•l �O • :J !Nil �} }� � r N 0 cg °ry ti� J N •tN �K r r � 6 a O 1 40. w O DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: crry OF RANCIiO CUCV%la`cA May 20, 1981 Members of the Planning Commission Barry K. Hogan, City Planner Michael Vairin, Senior Planner L:L`i'ltW1h1 ii Wk1F1l4 17.04.080, to eli allow projects to ESSMENT AND ZOA 81 -02 - AN AMENDMENT TO MENT PLAN - An amendment to the Rancho al Code, amending Chapter 17.04, Section minate the t,,i- annual review period and be filed on an open basis. 1977 ABSTRACT: In an effort to continue the improvement to the Development. Review process, Staff is proposing an amendment to the Growth Management Plan that would eliminate the tri- annual review periods and allow open filing for residential projects under the Growth Management Review pro- cess. Originally, it was thought that the limiting the filing periods would allow a more logical and reasonable processing procedure for pro- jects. However, we have found that these deadlines have created burdens for developers, private engineers and a,chitects, and City Staff. Over the :ast 3 filing periods we have found that there is a large crunch at the end of the period in order to get projects ready for submission. This has also led to the filing of projects which have been put together on the spur of the moment and do not reflect* the quality or thought that the Commission desires. By opening up the filing periods, it is anti- cipated that developers and engineers will take more time tc prepare a quality package and allow Staff the ability to phase projects in tale review process as they ar'e submitted,' rather than trying to deal with a bulk of projects all desiring to be reviewed simultaneously. In addition to this amendment, Staff is also requesting the City Council to amend Council Resolution No. 79 -74 (the Residential Assessment System) to reflect the definition of Affordable Housing, as shown in the adopted General Plan. The Commission adoptcd this definition through Commission Resolution No. 81 -06, which is attached for your information. Please find attached a copy of the proposed Ordinance which is planned to be presented to the City Council at its meeting of June 3, 1981. Staff is seeking concensus of the Planning Commission on this revision and a recommendation of approval to the City Council. ITEM F Staff Report ZOA 81-02 -2- May 20, 1981 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to consider any input relative to this matter. Upon conclusion of the public hearing, Staff recommends the adoption of the attached Resolution which recommends adoption of the amendment as outlined in the attached Ordinance. tfull,,y submitted, a :MV:cd Attachments: Resolution of Approval Proposed Ordinance Commission Resolution No. 81 -06 c; 1.1 G1 2 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 81 -02, TO ELIMINATE THE TRI- ANNUAL FILING PERIOD OF THE GRO14TH MANAGEMENT PLAN, TO THE CITY COUNCIL. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing to consider Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 81 -02; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission seeks to improve the development review process. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council, approval of Zoning Ordinance Ame:dment No. 81 -02, which ammends Chapter 17.04, Section 17.04.080 of the Municipal Code, as shown on the attached proposed ordinance. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission finds that this amendment will not cause significant adverse impacts upon the environment and therefore recommeeds issuance of a Negative Declaration. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27th DAY OF MAY, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Richard Dahl, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of May, 1981 by the following vote to- wit: AYES: C014MISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF R".NCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING THE RANCHO CUCAM071GA MUNICIPAL CODE, CHAPTER 17.04, GROWTH MANAGEME41' PLAN, SECTION 17.04.080, TO ELIMINATE THE T.RI- ANNUAL REVIEW PERIODS. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby adopts the following: SECTION 1: Chapter 17.04, Section 17.04.080 of the Municipal Code is hereby amended to rend as follows: 37.040.080 Review and processing proce A. Establishment of a residential assessment sys esidential E 1. A residential assessment system adopted by the council shall establish five basic categories and each category shall be assigned a maximum total points which will then be divided into sub - categories for rating purposes. The five basic categories are: public services, design quality, affordable housing, planned communities and planned unit develop- ments, and orderly development. 2. Applications for total development shall be rated by the growth management committee for (1; public services, (2) affordable housing, (3) planned communities and planned unit developments (PUD) and (4) orderly development, and by the design review committee for design quality. -I 3. Applications for custom lot /tract subdivisions shall be rated by the growth management committee for (1) public services, (2) site orientation and street design and (3) orderly development. 4. After rating, if the project meets or exceeds the thres- hold point limit, the subdivision will proceed to the planning commission for review and action. For those custom lot subdivisions tha'. are proposed to be built as a whole or total project and for tract subdivisions that have received planning commission approval, reapplication under total development, Section 1, Resolution No. 75 -74, a copy of which shall be on file in the office of the city clerk, shall be required as a condition of approval to be satisfi d p to approval and recordation of final map. 5. Projects shall be evaluated under the residential assessment by the community development director. Applications may be filed wi the Planning Division. Complete applications will be accepted for processing. 6. A threshold point limit shall be established by the city council as part of the residential assessment systen. This threshold point limit shall constitute the minimum number of points a project is required to achieve if it is to be given consideration for approval by the planning commission. 7. Those tentative tract applications that were previously filed under the county but not approved by the county planning commission shall not proceed with processing or filing until Review Period i as stated above. 11 Ordinance No. Page 2 g, Within five days after the point rating determination, the community developm,ncadntrstatin9htr� gaunt aatingtfoor notice resoidentialmailed (certified) to the app n has received the required development project and whether his app licatio threshold point limit for further consideration by the planning commission. B. Appeal of Ratings. lications by the growth management committee 1. Ratings of app and /or the design review orc M ttee may be ppeale vithhn planning days�s on by an aggrieved r after the day of decision. 2. The decision of the planning COMnin1eondefa qty sKan appeal may be ap,ealed to the city council by any gg of same manner and Lime limitations as are set forth othe u9g cil appeal with the plain86cs6 i1g79). The decisio -A txqou shall be final. (Ord. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 3r day of Jun196i n flxk AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M Wasserman, City osser, C� Resolution No. 81 -Ub Page 2 I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the fcregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passcd, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 19th day of January, 1981 by the following vote to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Scerar.ka, Rempel, Dahl NOES: COMMISSIONERS: King ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSTAINED: COMMISSIONERS: Tolstoy M CITY OF RAND 0 CUC'WOPZA STAFF REPORT May 27, 1981 T0: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Enginee r BY: Barbara Krail, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP NO. 6761 - CARNE INVESTMENT - A residential subdivision of 18.7 acres in two parcels in the R -1 zone located on the southwest corner of Highland Avenue and Carnelian Street INTRODUCTION r r s � This subdivision divides 18.7 acres of land into two (2) parcels. Parcel #1 is for the development of a 29 unit single family tract (Tract 9659) tentatively approved on Dec?mber 22, 1980. The applicant is presently negotiating with the State Department of Transporta- tion for acquisition of parcel #2 which is within the Route 30 transportation corridor. The City has received a letter from Mr. Gorgen, the applicant, stating that approval has been obtained from Cal Trans' Sacramento headquarters for the acquisition of the property and that acquisition can be completed within 90 -120 days. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Part I of the Initial Study has been cmmleted by the applicant and is attached for your review. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study and has con- ducted a field investigation. Upon completion and review of the initial study and field investigation, Staff found no significant adverse impacts on the envi- ronment as a result of the proposed subdivision. RECOMMENDATION Since CalTrans has aoproved the acquisition of the Route 30 transportation corri- dor, within Parcel Map 6761, it is recommended that the tentative map be approved, subject to the City Engineer's Report and that a Negative Declaration be issued. A resolution is attached to provide for approval should the Commission concur. Respectfully submitted, LB!-1. K: jaa . ®1 Attachments ITEM G RESOLUTION NO. AM A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBE!( 6761 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 6761) LOCATED AT SOUTH =ST CORNER OF CARNELIAN AND H!. :' ;_. - '% WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Humber 6751, subm'�• '' ay Carnelian Investments and consisting of 2 parcels, located at the southwest corner of Carnelian and Highland, being a division of a portion of Lot 11 of Block 19, Cucamonga Homestead Association, recorded in Book 6, page 46; and, WHEREAS, on Parch 3, 1981, a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above - described tentative map; and WHEREAS, on May 27, 1981, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above - described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 0 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 3. That the site is V % &ysically suitable for the proposed deveiol.Tnent. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage; public health problems or have adverse affect <_• on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse environmental impacts and Negative neclarafion is issued on May 27, 1981. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 6761 is approved subject to the conditions of the City Engineer's Report pertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27th DAY OF MAY, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1, 0 Resolution No. Page 2 0 BY: Richard DaFI,'Chai►^man ATTEST: ecretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of '.ne Planning Commission held on the 27th day of ;lay, 1981, by the following vote- to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: i r, z , • y, I . . . . ....... M ANAGAL ENGINECRIP1GCO TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NQ671 777 1� -!}O lySy . �clw . . . . ....... M Lk _J riwi 11 ANAGAL ENGINECRIP1GCO TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NQ671 1� -!}O lySy . �clw • II 4, 41 Lk _J riwi 11 ANAGAL ENGINECRIP1GCO TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NQ671 1� -!}O lySy . �clw Lk _J riwi 11 ANAGAL ENGINECRIP1GCO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FILED BY: Carnelian Investments TENTATIVE MAP NO. 6761 LOCATION: Southwest corner f Carnelian and DATE FILED: 3/3/81 _Highland NUMBER OF LOTS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: a portion of Lot 11. Block 19,_ RECEIPT NUMBER: ru amnnta Hom c:.ad Ascocatioii. Recorded in Book G, .$250.00 23oeAfi _ ZONE: R _1 TENTATIVE MAP PREPARED BY:Anacal Engineering GROSS ACREAGE: 18.7 acres ADDRESS: 222 F_ old tincnin Ave. MINIMUM LOT AREA: Anaheilp. CA 92803 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: -ECORD OWNER(S) ADDRESS PHONE ® 714/ Jarnelitin Investments _ 888 N. Main Street 987 -6228 REPORT OF THE CITY ENGINEER Dedications X y_ Suite 801, Santa Ana, CA 92701 1. Dedication by final map of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements ds sho-wn on the tentative map. 2. Dedication by final map of the following missing rights -of -way on the following streets: 11 additional feet on Carnelian Street In additional feet on_aa variable width :4+d )W)Q VAx:5iae)tcon Hi lap at the intersection with Carne I ian 24' Corner P/L rddius required on Carnelian Street and Jasper Street Other 3. Rights of vehicular access shall be limited as follows: Carnelian Street cDatiguous to subiect parcel. 4. Street vacation required for: 5. Master Plan of Streets revision required for: 6. The following perimeter intersections require realignment as follows: Highland Avenue at Carnelian shall be realiqned towards the south. RCE 20 TENTATIVE MAP NO. 5761 Page 2 Improvements (Bonding is required prior to ❑ Recording for Building permit forall partfe I s ) 7. Construct full street improvements (including curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, one drive approach per lot, parkway trees and street lights) on all .nterior streets. __X__ 8. Construct the following missing improvements on the following streets: *including landscaoina and irrigation on mptpr STREET NAME CURB & JGUTTER 1A.C. IPVMT. SIDE- WALK. DRIVE APPR. STREET TREES ISTREET LIGHTS MEDIAN ISLAND*1 OTHER Carrei ian X X anss en reT *Hi hlan.l X X X X cross u e and s ndrei Jasper X X X X X -inc r19nt, -W -way ui myniunu nvcnue aL tameTian aLreei, mall ue pdraiiei wiL:i Inc centerline of improvement of Highland Avenue. X 9. Construct all storm drain and drainage structures as shown on the tentative map, or, as required by the City Engineer. X 10. Provide all utility services to each lot including sanitary sewers, water, electric power, gas, telephone and cable television.conduit. All utilities are to be underground. X 11. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. X i2. Install appropriate street name signs and traffic control signs with loca- tions and types approved by the City Engineer. X 13. Developer is to provide all construction plans for drainage and street im- provements. Such plans shall meet approval of the City Engineer. X 14. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County .Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. X 15. Str:�et light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall be decorative poles with underground service. 16. The following existing streets being torn up by new,services will require an A.C. overlay: 17. The o oAing specs is dimensions, i.e., cul-de-sac radius, street section widths) are not approved: 18. T e o o.ving existing streets are su standar : They will require: Approvals and Fees X ?9. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CALTRANS/ ii�{�i�'��(�I IzYd4XxYra;cc>alcic�co�X��aI. X 20. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agen- cies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements,. that msy be received from them. 0 RCE 20 TENTATIVE MAP NO. -k7H1 Page 3 OX 21. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: X A. Caltrans, for: any encroachment on freeway right -of -way B. City: C. County Dust Abatement District: — D. D.I.S. Trenching Permit if any trenches are over 5 deep: C E. Cucamonga County Water District: F. Other- Map Control 22. If only a portion of this Map is recorded, adjustments shall be made to pro vide for two -way `r'affic and parking on all affected streets. _ 23. The following lots appear to be substandard in either frontage, depth or area and should be corrected on the final map: X 24. All corner lots shall have a corner radius at the right -of -way line in accord- - ance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga standards. 25. A Parcel tap shall be recorded prior to the first phase subdivision to prevent thu creation of an unrecognized parcel located X 26. The boundary of the Tentative P4ap needs car fication as fo IIOWS' t e Qa z and west dimensions (175 ft. and 320 ft respectively) of Parcel 1 C 27. The border shall be shown to centerline of existing perimeter streets, or ®— title explanation required: Parcel Map Waiver 28. Information submitted at the time of application is is not sufficient to support the issuance of a waiver of Parcel Map Certificate, according to requirements of the State Map Act and local ordinances. Flood Control (Bonding is required prior to 0 Recording for ) Building permit for ) 29. Proposed subdivision falls within those areas indicated as subject to flood- ing under the National Flood Insurance Program. This subdivision will be subject to the provisions of that program and Ordinance No. 24. 30. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall along the entire north pro- perty line may be required to divert sheet runoff to streets. Such flow may be required to go under sidewalks through culverts. 31. If water surface is above top of curb, 30" walls shall be required at the back of the sidewalk at all downstream curb returns. 32. Culverts required to be constructed across streets at following locations:_ 33. Broad scale hydrologic studies wi be re1Ju11'e to assess impact oT increased runoff. X 34. Carnelian Street shall be designed as a major water carrying street requiring a combination of special curb heights, rolled street connections, flood protection walls, and /or landscaped earth berm. RCE 20 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT IINTMRMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $s0.00 I] For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard.. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Naga'-ive Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: TENTITIVE TRACT NO. 9659 APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: CARNELIAN INVESTMENTS, 888 N. MAIN STREET, SUITE bOI, SANTA CALIF. 92701 71 9 7— 326 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: C. DOUGLAS GORGEN, 7333 HELLMAN AVENUE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA__ COT.TR 017Qn 7lll /OR7_r--�oA LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) SWC CARNELIAN & HIGHLAND A.P. No 201 - 214-05 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: NONE - Y -1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: DEVELOPMENT ON THE NORI l 29 -UNIT SINGLES - FAMILY RES_DENTIAL ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BiiILDINGSu IF ANY: Tnn ENTIRE PROPERTY IS 18.7_ ACRES OF VACANT LAND. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WOULD INVOLVE 7.9 ACRES OF THE NORTHERN PORTION DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANMI S (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): WARD TOWARDS CARNELIAN AVENUE. ON CONSISTS PRIMARILY OF GRASSES. A ROW OF EUCALYPTUS CROACHFS TN THE FUTURE RIGHT -OF -WAY OF JASPER STREET ALONG THE THERE. ARE NO CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCF,NIC ASPECTS _ RELATED -T& -THE SITE SURROUNDING PROPERTY USES ARE AS FOLLOWS: NORTH- R- 1- 10,000 GRADED LOTS WITHOUT HOUSES: EAST AND WEST - VACANT AND UN- DEVELOPED LAND: SOUTH - R -1 -8500 HOMES AND A SHOPPING CENTER. Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series' of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? NO z- 2 " � l t. WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO X I. Create a substantial change in ground contours? % 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)! X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5: Remove any existing trees? How many? X E. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any SU IS answers above: 3) AS A RESIDENTIAL WILL NEED gRR1rTrT7q 7k1nVMAi -Tv nocnnr IMPQ'lANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and 'belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by t o .Develop eilt Review Committee. i� , Date Signat Title I -3 11 Ell DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY Of RANCI-10 CUGkN1ONGA MIT PLEPORT May 27, 1981 Planning Commission Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer Barbara Y.rall, Engineering Technician Ci'i Y 1 RVOWiLi'i i PY.. NJL Pp 44I IWi✓ ASSOCIATION - An industrial subdivision of 71.9 acres into four (4) parcels, located between 4th and 6th Streets west of proposed Rochester Avenue INTRODUCTION The applicant is requesting a division of 71.9 acres into four (4) parcels. The surrounding areas are presently vacant. To the west, Parcel Map 6085, a Koll -Lyon subdivision of 73 acres into four (4) parcels is presently in the plan checking stages and will record in the near future. 1977 This subdivision will enable continuation of the development of this area under previous Parcel Map 5157 and 6085. An additional portion of 6th Street and a new north -south street will be provided, as well as a major storm drain. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Also attached for your review and consideration is Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Upon ccmipletion and review of the Initial Study and field investigation, Staff found no significant adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the pro- posed subdivision. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the tentative map be approved, subject Engineer's Report, and that a Negative Declaration be issued. attached to provide for approval should the Commission concur. Respectfully submittte�ed,/ _ eaa iaa LBH Attachments ITEM H to the City A resolution is RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 6863 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 686 3) LOCATED BETWEEN 4TH AND 6TH STREETS, WEST OF PROPOSED ROCHESTER AVENUE. WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 6863, submitted by Koli -Lyon Association and consisting of 4 parcels, located between 4th and 6th Streets, west of proposed Rochester Avenue, being a division of a portion of the southwest quarter of Section 18, T1S, R6W, San Bernardino Meridian; and, WHEREAS, on April 28, 1931, a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above - described tentative map; and WHEREAS, on May 27th, 1931, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above- described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will net cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse environmental impacts and Negative Declaration is issued on May 27, 1981. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 6833 is approved subject to the con itions of the City Engineer's Report pertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF MAY, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2 Resolution No. Page 2 BY: Richard Dahl —cna r1 ,n an ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission 1, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho ;;ucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of May, 1981, by the following vote -to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: E zrr �Ig l 7AE1VrAr1BCE PARCEL AIAR /rot 643G:5 m,. .iA1... m./ r1. r4RO11ao.,zrAC'"G4iYwo�:°.>°..i 11M�A A p O�V.�1Uwt d A YO,Yr,C],J OP r..0 MV1'.�1 � Wde�rY O�JUrirRN o� �T.x'1YOU 10� i�xrL1•J.Jfiyi� 1 �Ot1TM. 4.y� p V..<�T. r ti 1AJp M6J4JOVt{.). L Miaw e ps W 14UhM%01J� nl.�o 5cw41q CML E4M,I.I�PA18 atom. uvula 'LI' 94WEN �O li' W/ >TON t1.�R °+CAI. 1• � 2.00° /.n....r�on.A Taa• :2C 44uG lX M" a . 1'tJGrH11.A• 9tvb. oulrn � c- RIn.LTO. !J+LI►0.3NIA � 9L•"•y'b ►F101Ji: �•110.i CTC "7r�G $FIIQ�ICd:@L ROLL - � Y00.1 1t0e0..1 w{+'�a1f�aT��. 'Bl'P1EC1' WILI.I/aNCG.a A4JM SC 4Mlt QJIL Mmik.faMptB IT/G't i.WY RatAYt OIVC>. IRV1U10. CJtL11g1y1.J1.V LG'il4 F110t1N��iML) ISgb- C'L'22 S�IOTES3: L. �'�y L.auO tld f4 p /mttwTMJO 1.e+1G UML•.: 4. 1VJ.O�wAVtlJGt4a. 11olt» aR olmolca 'tDfl'gC� Ott ertB. F�JOU1f�t•A. stnl�o vara� 1.IOr 01JC)/XT Tb ItJ1.1Np1a 101.y1�, pr �/� G.t'%WM I.IOfSfH�ib 00UiNTCR ;i 1 1] is U m atom. uvula 'LI' 94WEN �O li' W/ >TON t1.�R °+CAI. 1• � 2.00° /.n....r�on.A Taa• :2C 44uG lX M" a . 1'tJGrH11.A• 9tvb. oulrn � c- RIn.LTO. !J+LI►0.3NIA � 9L•"•y'b ►F101Ji: �•110.i CTC "7r�G $FIIQ�ICd:@L ROLL - � Y00.1 1t0e0..1 w{+'�a1f�aT��. 'Bl'P1EC1' WILI.I/aNCG.a A4JM SC 4Mlt QJIL Mmik.faMptB IT/G't i.WY RatAYt OIVC>. IRV1U10. CJtL11g1y1.J1.V LG'il4 F110t1N��iML) ISgb- C'L'22 S�IOTES3: L. �'�y L.auO tld f4 p /mttwTMJO 1.e+1G UML•.: 4. 1VJ.O�wAVtlJGt4a. 11olt» aR olmolca 'tDfl'gC� Ott ertB. F�JOU1f�t•A. stnl�o vara� 1.IOr 01JC)/XT Tb ItJ1.1Np1a 101.y1�, pr �/� G.t'%WM I.IOfSfH�ib 00UiNTCR ;i 1 1] is CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FILED BY: Koll -Lyon Association TENTATIVE MAP NO. 6863 LOCATION: West of nronpsed Rochester Avenue DATE FILED: 4/28/31 between 4th & 6th Street NUMBER OF LOTS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION* being a oro7osed division of a RECEIPT NUMBER: 11155 potion of the southwe41 i/2 of Section 18. TIS, FEE: $250.O0 ZONE: MAP PREPARED * k * * * * * * * * * * * * * * GROSS ACREAGE: 79.9 ADDRESS: 17782 Sky Park Blvd_ MINIMUM LOT AREA: Irvine_ CA 9$714 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: ECORD OWNER(S) ADDRESS PHONE k R. C. Land Co, 380 W_ Foothill Blvd, 714/874-3770 Suite C.- Rialto, CA 92376 REPORT OF THE CITY ENGINEER Dedications X_ 1. Dedication by final map of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. X_ 2. Dedication by final map of the following missing rights -of -way on the following streets: _ 6.0 additional feet on 6th Street — _ —5Q additional feet on Rochester Avoriue additional feet on 24, Corner P/L radius required on -all intersections _ Other X_ 3. Rights of vehicular access shall be limited as follows. 4th. 6th and Rochester Ay na ue ,ner Planning Commission Resolution 78 -29, 4. Street vacation required for: _ 5. Master Plan of Streets revision required for: _ _ 6. The following perimeter intersections require realignment as follows: RCE 20 TENTATIVE NEAP NO. Lau Page 2 Improvements (Bonding is required prior to)Q Recording for 1 as^ ale ❑ Building permi'aj S"'—"� 1 _X 7. Construct full street improvements (including curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, , one drive approach per lot, parkway trees and street lights) on all interior streets. X_ 8. Construct the following missing improvements on the following streets:J---% *inrl,..i;..., 1....t. _-A _ STREET NAME 6th Street - - CUR CURB & ' X A.C. PCMT. Y, ..r SIDE- WALK X .yo�.vn DRIVE APPR. X V❑ metier STREE _TREES X S 'REET LIGHTS X MEDIA14 ISLAND * X - OTHER len e ment X 9. Construct all storm drain and drainage structures as shown on the tentative map, or as required by the City Engineer. _ X 10. Provide all utility services to each lot including sanitary sewers, water, electric power, gas, telephone d . XAr dq (pp(Xp(A(MiMXXrNObMiX All utilities are to be underground. x_ 11. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or ot: er existing public utilities as necessary. X 12. Install appropriate street name signs and traffic control signs with loca- tions and types approved by the City Engineer. _X_ 13. Developer is to provide all construction plans for drainage and street im- provements. Such plans shall meet approval of the City Engineer. _X_ 14. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. _X_ 15. Stree� light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edisor. Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall be decorative poles with underground service. 16. The following existing streets being torn up by new services will require an A.C. overlay- 17. The o owing speci 7c imensions, 7.e., cu - e -sac ra ius, street section widths) are not approved: 18. The f9l lowing existing streets are suTstan ar They will require: — Approvals and Fees 19. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of San Bernardino County Flood Control District. y_ 20. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities Gies involved. Approval of ".'e final map will be that may be received from them. RCE 20 approval from CALTRANS/ and other interested agen- subject to any requirements a TENTATIVE MA? NO. EBa Page 3 2_ 21. Permits -from other agencies will be required as follows: _ A. Caltrans, for: B. City: )F— C. County Dust Abatement District: San Bernardino Gn"nty D. D.I.S. Trenching Permit if any trenches are over 5 deep: E. Cucamonga County Water District: water and sFwer F. Other: Map Control _ 22. If only a portion of this Map is recorded, adjustments shall be made to pr3 -- vide for two -way traffic and parking on all affected streets. _ 23. The following lots appear to be substandard in either frontage, depth or area and should be corrected on the final map: x_ 24. All corner lots shall have a corner radius at t e right -o • -way ine in accord- ance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga standards. 25. A Parcel Map shall be recorded prior to the first phase subdivision to prevent the creation of an unrecognized parcel located 26. The boundary of the Tentative Map needs c Frif7cation as follows: _ 27. The border shall be shown to centerline of existing perimeter streets, or title explanation required. arcel Map Waiver 28. Information submitted at the time of application is / is not sufficient to support the issuance of a waiver of Parcel Map Certific te, according to requirements of the State Map Act and local ordinances. Flood Control (Bonding is required prior to ;M Recording for storm drain ) ❑ Building permit for ) X 29. Proposed subdivision falls within those areas indicated as subject to flood- ing under the National Flood Insurance Program. This subdivision will be subject to the provisions of that program and Ordinance No. 24. Zone A0. X 30. A drainage 61annel and /or flood protection wall along the entire north pro- perty line may be required to divert sheet runoff to streets. Such flow may be required to go under sidewalks through culverts. X_ 31. If water surface is above top of curb, 30" walls shall be required at the back of the sidewalk at all downstream curb returns. 32. Culverts required to be constructed across streets at following locations:_ i_ 33. Brad scale hydrologic studies will a required to assess impact of increased runoff. 34. Installation of the storm drain (Line 19A) from the existing pipe in 6th Street to 4th Street as shown on the tentative map shall be required. RCE 2C II TENTATIVE MAP NO. 6863 Paga 4 I Miscellaneous X 35. Dust abatement will be made a conditioi of issuance of the grading.permit for this project. _ 36. Noise impact on this project will be mitigated in accordance with the Plaining Division report on subject property. _ 37. This property is not within the presert City Boundary and will require annexation. _ 38. All information required to be shown cn the tentative map is not shown as re- quired X 34. Proper gr« ing and erosion contro , i i cl uding the preventation of sedimenia= tion or damage to offsite property shill be provided for as required. _ 40. A preliminary soils report will not br; required for this site for the follm- ing reasons: A copy of the soils report furnished to the Building Division prior to grading will be furnished to the Engineering Division. x _ 41. The filing of the tentative map or approval �,f same does not guarantee *.hat sewer treatment capacity will be avai able at the time building permits art requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Wate^ District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits 011 not be issued unless said certificatiin is received in writing. V_ 42. The City Engineer shall make the dete urination, in accordance with Section' 66436(C)(1) of the Subdivision Map Ac*, that division and development of tie property will not unreasonably interfr;re with the free and complete exercise of any public entity or public utility right -of -way or easement and the si m ture of any such public entity or public utility may be omitted from the f n map unless the City is notified in writing of any objection to said determ na- tion within the specified time limits )f said Section. _ 43. At the time of Final Map submittal, the following shall be submitted: Tra!erse calculations (sheets), copies of recorled maps and deeds used as reference and/ or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. _ 44. Development shall be limited to one dr ve approach per street. Multipl.0 l is fronting on a single street shall use common drive appr aches at lot lines X 45. A temporary 26' wide street ,. onnection shall be require$ between 6th Street land Rochester Avenue along the north parcel boundary and shall remain in place fntil such time as the master planned street intersection of 6th and Rochester is, constructed. 11 i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA i LLOYD B. HUSBS CITY ENGINEER By: i „` RCE 20 JAW • C � CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMCN GA INITIAL STUDY :T I1{ 1PROJECT INFORMP.�ION SHEET — To be completed by applicant +Environmental Assessment Review Fee: For all projects requiring environmental review, this forr- must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an 6nvironmantal impact and an Envirormental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional info- mation -report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Tentative P3=p No. 686 AFPLIChNVS NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: yr.31_Tyy�, l>Ol Dove Street, Newport Peach, CA 92660 (714) 833 -3030 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING TIIIS PROJECT: willia.RSon and Schmid, 3.7782 Sky Park Blvd., Inf=, CA 92714 (734) 549 =22 ' •rt Sundg+rnm LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL 170.) South side of Sixth Street, 575' t easterly of Pittsburgh Street LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: None ^`; 79268.10 PROJECT iRESCP.IPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT- Tentative Parcel Map No. 6863 creating four (4) parcels from one (ID 71.9 t_acre parcel. ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE Or EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: Project Area Acreage 71.9 -b acres Nb hiildinec xiatin� can ati }P —' DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES A ?7D THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): ExiS 'n4 site -is enne y ly \R°P -y-e . glp2in4 from rth i7n Soli }h n[be site is devoid of an+v natural _ fa };,,„ aneq Is the project, part of a larger project, ont �f a series- of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? No WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO X 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? 3_ Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)' X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5: Remove any existing trees? How many? % 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: IVA IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowle-1ge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Development Review/ Committee. Date mot' ' /r 4 (/ Signature -► i �(�N� A 6UW Title � 1 Pier- 1fL C714� �✓—QGl 2222 RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development.. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Specific Location of Project: PHASE I PHASE 2 Pi7ASE 3 PHASE 4 1., Number of single family units: _ 2. Number of multiple family units: 3. Date proposed to begin construction: 4. Earliest date of occupancy: Model # and r of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price Ranae TOTAL CITY OF RAC.' ©iO CUCAMONGA SrAFF RE EPOKJL DATE: May 27, 1981 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner , SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMFNT FOR TRACT mrxuuw� - consiaeraxion of recommenaa preparatio of Environmental Impact Report (cIR), Fo sidential project consisting of 60 single family i within the R -1 -8,500 zone generally located on the theast corner of Carnelian Street and Highland Avenue thin the pro- posed Foothill Freeway Corridor - APN - 221 -42 ABSTRACT: This is a consideration only for environmental assessment and will not consider approval or denial of the tentative tract. Recommendation will be made to require an Environmental Impact Report. DISUCSSION: As the Planning Commission will recall on the Carnelian Investment tract across the street from the subject property, an EIR was required relative to the impacts of developing a tract within the freeway corridor. It was the City Engineers opinion that the approval of a tract in the freeway corridor would bear great significance upon the Circulation Element recently adopted by the City Council. The City Engineer's opinion is that an Environmental Impact Report should be prepared which analyzes the impacts associated with the Circulation Element, the obstruction of the proposed freeway, and the deletion of the freeway from the General Plan. Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant and is attached for your review. Part II of the Initial Study, and the Environmental Checklist has been completed by Staff and is also attached for your review. Based upon the potential adverse impact relative -to the City's Circulation Element, the Initial Study recommends preparation of an Environmental Impact Report which will focus on the issues as outlined within the Initial Study. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to consider the input on this project and after such consideration, if the Commission concurs with the findings of Staff relative to the potential adverse impacts that may be created on the environment as a result of this project, require the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report focused on circulation aspects, the General Plan Freeway Designation, and the overall impact of building within the projected freeway ccrridor. tted, t-y Planner ITEM I CITY OF RANCHO fUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY 1 PART I - PROJECT ZNFDRMhTI0N SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $80 -00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no - nvironmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be �-`iled, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental. Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by t"- applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project_ PROJECT TITLE: Alta Loma Meadows "C" PPLICAh ^r'S NAME, ADDRESS", TELEPHONE: Alta Loma Meadows "C" NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Jim Butler, 1 Suite "N "_ Oranze. Calif_ 92667 (714) LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) East side Carnelian St.. 750' t N'ly C.L. 19th St. 201- 221 -042 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AIM THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: Normal city and county subdivision requirements. Metropolitan Water District and Cal -Trans review. - g -1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT- 55 lot subdivision of residential construction, ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 15.81 acres, homes with square footage of -r",000*iW{ DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMF,TION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): ® Site has no known cultural or historical aspects. Site has no existingg structures. North of site is existing single _ family homes, West of site is vacant, east of site is vacant. Northeast of site is a city park, south of site is a neiabbor- hood shopping center and an apartmpgnt comp ex Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series' of cumulative actions. which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? No. $- 2. WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO % 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? R 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? _ X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? _ X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5: Remove any existing trees? How many? X_ 6_ Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flaamiables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above- and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by the .Development Review Committee. Date I- -13 Signature .G�t Ll/iGG /�9�7 h�./19✓ii Title ,LACE Z60�8 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PART II = INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DATE: APPLICANT: �J�- yOPdl�k^ 14c— ,Afiowe= �- FILING DATE: Zq LOG NUMBER: -Tr PROJECT: 6po "r 5, fe. �YJBDIV(SIOAJ PROJECT LOCATION: ro' 6W- NEeI.&fj , 4510 Vft4 j+t.AfJ0 I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets). YES MAYBE NO 1. Soils and Geology. Will the proposal have significant re<sults in: a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? b. 'Disruptions,. displacements, compaction or burial. of the soil? c. Change In topography or ground surface _ contour intervalmm? d. The destruction.; covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any potential increase in wind or water erosion of soils, affecting either on or off site conditons? f. Changes in erosion sIrtation, or deposition? 1! g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? 1/ h. An increase in the rate of extraction and /or use of any mineral resource? 2. Hydrology. Will the proposal have significant results in: YES MAYBE NO a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream _channels? ) - b. Changes in sbsorptica rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount- of surface water runoff? ` c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d- Change in the amount of surface water in any body of water? / e. Discharge into surface waters, or any alteration of surface water quality? Ieo f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? g. Chance in the quantity of groundwaters,' either through direct additions or with- _ drawals, or through interference wish an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? ` h. The reduction in the amount of water other- - wise available for public water supplies? i. Ezposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or seiches? _ 3. Air Quality. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile or indirect sources? Stationary sources? -- b. Dete- 'ioration of ambient aii quality and /or interference with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? c. Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? 4. Biota Flora. SJill the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or number Of any species of plants? b. Reduction of the numbers of any u pique, rare or endangered species of plants YES MAYBE NO c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of Cplants into an area? - d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural production? Fauna. Will the proposal have significant results in: Lf I a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or numbers Of ary species of animals? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration or removal of exist ?.ng fish or wildlife habitat? 5. Poaulatiozi. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of the human population of an area? b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 6. Socio- Economic Factors. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in local or regional Socio- economic characteristics, including economic or commercial diversity, tax rate, and property values? b. Will project costs be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax pavers or project users? 7. Land Use and Planning Considerations. Will the Proposal have significant results in? a. A substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, Policies. or adopted plans of any governmental entities? c. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of existing consumptive or non - consumptive recreational opportunities? Aleo� leo $• Transn1 --on Will the proposal have significant results in: a• Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b• Effects on existing streets, or demand for new street construction? c. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking d. Substantial ;;;pact upon existing transporta- tion systems? e- Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of people and /or goods? f. Alterations to or effects on present and Potential water- borne, rail, mass transit or air traffic? g- Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 9. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. A c.isturbance to the integrity of archaeological, paleontological, and /or historical resources? 10. Health, Safety, and Nuj5nuce Factors. Will the Proposal have significant results in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? b F ='r" a of people to Potential health hazards? c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances in the event of all accident? f- d. An increase in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of organisms? people to such e. Increase in existing noise levels? f. Exposure of peopl noise e to potentially dangerous I $• The creation of objectionable odors? h. An increase in light or glare? YES MAYBE NO 4-leo _,-` 40C C (. 0 YES MAYBE NO 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant results in: — a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic ` vista or view? - — Ae' b. The craation of an aesthetically offensive site? C. A conflict with the objective of designated or potential scenic corridors? 12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal have a significant need for new systems, or alterations to the following: a. Electric power? b. Natural or packaged gas? C. Communications systems? —_ _Ll d. Water supply? e. Wastewater facilities? _ f. Flood control structures? _ g. Solid waste facilities? -� h. Fire protection? -� i. Police protection? j. Schools? k. Parks or other recreational facilities? 1. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads and flood control facilities? M. Other governmental services? 13. Energy and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal have significant results - a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy? c. An increase in the demand for J.�velopment of new sources of energy? d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumption of non - renewable forms of energy, when feasible renewable sources of energy are available? / ' raga I 1II. DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: i find the proposed project COULD 140T have a significant effect _ on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an - rtached sheet have been added to One project_ A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED, •I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the envirnment, .. E ""'IDnNMEENT IMPACT REPORT is req. fired. Date /'Fpt, °Ai Title l PART II - DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONPiEN�VALUATION 2. Hydrology - The project will be changing the absorption rates, drainage pattern and the rate and amount of surface water runoff. A grading plan has been prepared in accord anr_e' with the subdivision design and has been found to adequately dewater the subdivision without significant adverse impacts on adjacent properties. 5. Population - If the subdivision as proposed is constructed, this could alter the location, distribution and growth rate of the area as this would be blocking a main transportation corridor for this area. G. Socio- economic factors - The result of the construction of this project within a proposed freeway corridor could change Socio- economic characteristics of the area relative to tax rates and property values. 7. Land Use and Planning Considerations - The proposal, if con structed,wiil substantially alter the present planned land use of the area. in addition, the tract is in conflict wit, objectives, policies and adopted plans of other regional governments and the City plan for the ultimate development of a freeway corridor through the site. Transportation - If this project is constructed it will sub- stantially impact on the existing `ransporation system since it would prevent the construction of a freeway of high voiumE transportation corridor, thus affecting traffic circulation Patterns throughout the City and area. In addition, it woulc alter the planned mass transit potential, if this area is ob- structed by the construction of this project. 12. Utilities and Public Services - The development project coul(I have be impacts upon the schc_1 system should the schocls not be able to accommodate the projected amount of students that would be generated by this development. To mitigate this area, certified 1- etters from affected school districts will be required which indicate that there is adequate capa- city for the development. e. Subsiantial depletion of any nonrenewable or scarce natural resource? 14_ Pfandatory Findings of Significance. a- the projec.; have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce, the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to Climinate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eLminate important examples of the major periods of California history o�: prehistory? h. Does the project have the potential to achieve short -term, to the disadvantage of long -term, environmental goals? (A short -term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long- _ term impacts will endure well into the future). c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, and Probable future projects). d. Does the project nave environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly_or indirectly? YES MAYBE NO 4.etl .b� II. DISCCSSIO ?I OF ENVIRONNFPdTAL E)C ON (i,e,, of affirmative answers to the above quesr_ions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures). e%z-sS, AT Is L CITY OF RAiNZCI -10 CU0k1lO \GA STA F RL, ]PORT DATE: May 27, 1981 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Assistant Planner 0 >I F �• UI SUBJECT: REJEST FOP. TIME EXTENSION FCR DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 79 VANIR DEVELOP14ENT COMPANY - Proposed office complex located on the northwest corner of Archibald and 19th Street ABSTRACT: The applicant is requesting a time extension for the approved office complex located on the northwest corner of Archibald and 19th Street. This is the second application for a time extension request for this project. Based upon changes in City policies and standards, and.the adoption of the General Plan whicn promotes h;gh design quality, Staff recommends that the Commission deny this time extension request. BACKGROUND: On April 11, 1979, the Planning Commission approved, by split decision, a 16,000 sq. ft. office complex and two satellite buildings for the northwest corner of Archibald and 19th Street. The northern portion of the subject property, was conceptualiy indicated as an apartment development. Two Commissioners dessented their vote statirg dissatisfaction with the architectural design of the office complex. On June 11, 1980, the Planning Commission approved a time extension for this project to June 16, 1981; again, concern was ex- pressed regarding the architectural "design of the office complex.. The extension was granted, subject to modification of the building fascade and additional review by the Design Review Committee. ANALYSIS: Please find attached a copy of the approved site plans, elevations, copies of the Planning Commission Minutes, and a copy of the conditions of approval. Throughout the history of this project, the design concept has been questioned in terms of quality and appro- priatness for professional office uses. The main objection was that the office building appears to be designed as a retail style shop building similar to that found in some of the industrial buildings fronting Archibald Avenue. Since the April 11, 1979 approval date of this project, approved projects have reflected a higher degree of architectural quality. As you can see from the conditions of approval, the applicant was required to submit details of the two satellite buildings for formal Director Review, which has not occurred to date. To date, plans have not been submitted for plan check to the Building and Safety Division for any pertion of this project. Past policy has been to approve ITEM Staff Report DR 79 -28 !IPZ Play 27, 1981 projects for a one year period with possible extensions should the Commission feel that the project meets present day policies and standards. Only one project, Director Review No. 78 -30, the reno- vation of the Mobil Oil Service Station on the corner of Arrow and Archibald, has ever received more than one time extension. In that case, the time extension was granted based upon the fact that Mobil Oil had drawings submitted to the Building and Safety Division for plan check and permits would be issued in 60 days. Two options are available to the Planning Commisiion concerning this item. First, if the Planning Commission feels that the project design does not meet current City standards and policies, the Planning Commission could deny the time extension request. This would require the applicant to submit a new Development Review package should they desire to continue with the project. Secondly, the Commission could grant a time extensiu;. IF it is felt that the design of the project is adequate. RECOMMENDATION: Based upon recent project approvals and design quality encouraged in the General Plan for Special Boulevards (Archibald), Staff feels that the project does not meet current design quality standards. Therefore Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny the time extension request. KH :DC:cd Attachments: d, Letter from Vanir Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - E: -crier R!! ;'. +� ^.y Elevations Planning Comm -scion Minutes of April 11, 7979 Planning Commission Minutes of June 11, 1980 2 �•J M VANIR DEVEI- Ot'MENT COMPANY COMMERCIAL /INDUSTRIALDEVE'IAPERS . REAL ESTATE BROKERS P.O BOX 910 . VANIn TOWER . CITY HALL PLAZA . SAN BERNARDINO. CA 02402 . 714,1104.0414 *lay 12, 1981 Mr. Michael Vairin Senior Planner CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA Yost Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701 Re: DIRECTOR REVIEW 79 -28 Proposed. Office Complex, NWC 19th Street and Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, California Dear Mr. Vairin: Than1L you for receipt of your letter dated May 1, 1981 to our office. After careful revie,T of your comments to our request for a one year extension of the original one year deferment, it has been decided to pursue review of said request by the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission. As you are well aware, V.mir Development Company has completed all of the working drawings for the proleirt which have been submitted through the Planning Commission and approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. We are in all respects prepared to begin construction on this aroject however. due to the current money market conditions we feel that It is net prudent to start construction at this time. Our request for extension is tendered to the continued concern over the market conditions current predictions. As you know, interest rates have again climbed to 10�% with predictions of even higher rates. IV is obviously not the proper time to begin a project. Furthermore, as the Planning Commission is fully aware, there are substantial vacancies existing throughout Rancho Cucamonga and it would be likewise prudent that consideration be given to our extt._sion so as to allow some of these other projects an opportunity to mature. We are confidant that the interest rates will fall within the year and allow us to began our project. We are thereby respectfully submitting the enclosed chec;: for the amount. of $50.00 for the processing of this extension. It is my under=-:ding that this matter shall be scheduled Mr. Michael Vairin May 12, 1981 Page 2 to appear before the Planning Commission on Wednesday, May 27, 1981. I would appreciate official confirmation of this date. Thank you for giving this matter your consideration. Very truly yours, VAN/IR BEVELOPMEkIT COMPANY RAMON J. POLIN RJP /jas Enclosure: Check in the amount of $50.00 LI C1 } r � 1 r� j. i` 1�U,C.�11 PIN M ZZ 'E C y a } w� �sIL �tef A71 R < IYC: MET 4 i d qm .3 �• I�ti Z 11 QI IC�•i E-4 °�� IJ.•r• M° i 'i•„ ' �-� I � 1 in V N F M liimi i ri � 1111,, � w I q � Y _3 P M r 3 H �Ya sYa — VGV� � • • I `.E 111 I 11 T_ F i w w F C O 1. a w —1 r. 1 � M1T Z� O F w w F m w Z�O F a rc w F m yi m s I r iz 'a w z 0 U � f z � Ci w a O . F W p � I O m fl >� f H � Qi I f c I 1 i Chaiman. Rempel asked for comments from the applicant. The applicants indicated they have no comments at this time; however, would be happy to answer any questions the Commission might have_ Commis:;ioner Garcia asked what businesses are proposed within the development. Representative from Vanir Research stated at this time they do not know who the tenants will be; however, it will be required that they be businesses allowed within the A -P district. Mr. Lam stated the A -P zone allows a wide range of office facilities such as lending institutions, medical offices and also allows restaurants. Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing. There being no continents from the audience, Chairman Rempel closed the public hearing. A Motion was made by Commissioner Garcia and seconded by Commissioner Jones to approve Resolution No. 79 -33 recommending approval of Zone Change No.. 79 -03 to the City Council. AYES: GARCIA, JONES, DAHL, TOLSTOY, REMPEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE t Ask DIRECTOR REVIEWT NO. 79 -28 - VANIY RESEARCH - The development of a financial institution, rssta,.*rant and profeL.sional offices located on the northwest corner of 19th Street and Archibald Avenue. Mr. Lam stated this request is for the actual review of the site plan. Barry Hogan, Senior Planner, reviewed the staff report in detail, this being on file in the PlanninG Division. Staff recommends approval of Resolution No. 79 -28 approving Director Review No. 79 -28. Chairman Rempel asked for questions from the Commission of the staff. Mr. Hogan stated two additional conditions should be added to the Resolution as follows: 1) Extend the rocf line along the north and west elevation, 2) the approval of this project shall expire within one year unless exercised by the issuance of building permits. Commissioner Tolstoy stated little, if any, attention has been given to the screening from the proposed project on the north. Since this project is going to be built in two phases, now is the time to get that screening designed and planned. Mr. Horan stated the landscaping could be increased to 10'. He indicated there is a condition of the Resolution which stated the landscaping plan is to be brought back to the Planning Division for approval. If the Commission desires, this condition could be changed to have review by the Planning Commission. Commissioner Tolstoy stated he feels staff can review the landscape plans as .long Planning Commission Minutes -8- April 11, 1979 as they know the Commissions' desires. Co,mi.ssioner Garcia stated he is disturbed with the elevations proposed. We are entertaining a profe ::: >ional office complex that, in his opinion, is not compatible to other previously approved office complex developments within the City. This development is the type which could be developed within an industrial zone: It needs a complete restudy. This is not the image he wants to see for office and professional buildings. Chairman Rempel stated this construction is very similar to the development across the street; however, in his opinion, is an improvement over that development. Commissioner Garcia stated, in his opinion, the architect could enrich the architectual detailing style and design of the building elevations. Commissioner Dahl stated if the roof line is extended along the north and west elevations; and with additional landscaping to the north, he does not see any further problems with the development. Representative of Vanir Development indicated they are willing to meet all conditions with regard to landscaping. Mr. Ted Stelzer, Designer with Vanir Development Company, stated they went out of their way with this development to project a professional office design. It is his opinion this will be a first class building with first class materials and will be a nice a2dition to the coimnunity. A Motion was made by Commissioner Dahl and seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy to approve Resolution No. 79 -32 subject to the conditions listed with the following additions: 1. Extend the roof line along the north and west elevations. 2. The approval of this project shall expire within one year unless exercised by the issuance of building permits. 3. Additional landscaping is required to the north of the property. AYES: DAHL, TOLSTOY, REMPEL, JONES NOES: GARCIA ABSENT: NONE DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 79 -2E - LONGLEY - Request for development of a retail and wholesale building materials and supply center located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, 1,000'+ lest of the Df-.ore Freeway in the C -2 zone and M -1 zone. Barry Hogan, Senior Planner, -eviewed the staff report in detail, this being on file in the Planning Division. Staff has found the site plan to be a substantial improvement over previous submittals. It allows the Commission to see how the proposed phase one will fit in with the ultimate development of the site. However, staff would recommend that the Commission continue this item for four weeks to allow the applicant time to revise the architectural plans for the proposed office retail structure and give the applicant the direction necessary for those architectural revisions. Planning Commission Minutes -9- April 11, 1979 r � for recreational purposes. Mr. Barry Hogan, Senior Planner, responded to Mr. Chitea and stated that the slope is so extreme in this area that an easement could not be nrovided on th4 eactcrn boundary of this property. Following further Commission discussion, it was moved by Dahl, seconded by Jones, carried. unanimously, to approve Resolution No.80 -34, with conditions to enlarge lots 2 -3, if necessary, provide an enlarged cul -de -sac with is- land for vehicle maneuvering, and amending condition No. 46. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Dahl, Jones, Garcia, Tolstoy, Rempel NOES: C014MISSIONMS: None ABSENT: COPM4ISSIONERS: None 8:05 p.m. The Planning Commission recessed 8 :25 p.m. The Planning Commission reconvened. TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 11461 - LEWIS - A request to convert a previously ap- proved 248 unit apartment complex on 15.2 acres of land into condominiums. The project site is located on the north side of 19th Street between Car- nelian and Beryl in the R -3 (Multiple Family Residential) Zone and generally known as Sunscape II. Mr. Barry Hogan, Senior Planner, reviewed the staff report. He indicated that the City Attorney had given his opinion chat this complex, Sunscape II, was excluded from the provisions of the recently adopted condominium moratorium ordinance. Further, unless the City has an ordinance regulating the conversion of apartments into condominiums, there is no authority to condition the tentative map relative to design, landscaping, parking or laundry facilities, etc. There being no further discussion by the Planning Commission, it was moved by Dahl, seconded by Jones, carried unanimously, to approve Resolution No. 80 -33, allowing the Sunscape II apartrents to 'be converted into condominiums. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Dahl, Jones, Garcia, Tolstoy, Rempel N0S: COMMISSIONERS: None A13SEDIT: COMMISSIONERS: None TIME EXTENSION REQUEST FOR DIRECT013 REVIEW N0. 79 -28 - VANIP. RESEARCH COi•I- PAM4Y - A request Vor an extension of time for a pr•evious.y a� pprovU 1,3,3 ee complex which is to be located on the northwest corner of Archibald and Nineteenth Street within the A -P (Administrative- P_of(-ssio.nal) Zone. Michael Vairin, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report. Following the review, the City Attorney, b'r. Ted Hopson, pointed out the actions the Commission had ava:lable regarding this request, st :Ming that if there were ±ma„�r revisions to the plan it would require another Director Review, but if the changes were of a minor nature, they should be alluded. :18irman Rempel asked if there were any questions from t:fe audi�_z:ce. Planning Commission Minutes -4- June 11, 1930 4 Mr_ Tim :iix, rcpreacnting Vanix Research, addressed the Commission and stated the reasons for requesting a time extension on this project. Chairman Rempel asked if there were any questions from the al:dience. There were none. Discussion ensued among the rl�,ining Commmission concerning landscaping in other Vanir held properti.er, and whether this proposed project would have well- maintained landscaping. Mr. Hix in answering indicated. that while there had been problems with some other Vanir projects which were now in the process of being remedied, that this would not happen_ at the project proposed at 19th and Archibald. Further discussion took place _egarding possible pyramidal zoning. The City Attorney replied that uses would be controlled through the business licensing process. CommissicnerTolstoy expressed his concern that because of the design of this building, uses other than professional office uses, may result. Mr. Tolstoy suggested that a minor design change on the windows would create the feeling that this proposed project is an office complex and would help to avoid prob- lems in the future in keeping A -P uses only. The Commission asked the City Attorney for his opinion on whether proposed changes to the windows would create a problem for the applicant. Mr. Hopson replied that if the applicant does not see this as a problem, then one did not exist. Commissioner Tolstoy asked about 'the applicant's present landscaping plan. Mr. Hix replied that the plans have been upgraded substantiall: . Michael Vairin indicated that when the new plans were reviewed, the land- scaping is conceptually what the Planning Commission would desire. Following further discussion, it was moved by Garcia, seconded by Dahl, car- ried unanimously, to grant a one -year extension for Director Review No. 79 -28, with a condition that the building facade be modified and that the project be examined by the Design Revi °w Committee. There being no further discussion, it was moved by Dahl, seconded by Tolstoy, carried unanimously, to adjourn the meeting at 9:10 p.m. 9:1.0 p.m. The Planning Commission Adjourned. Respectfully submitted, -5- June 11, 1980 0 IT"Y OF RANaIO CUCAMONGA STAFF PX1T0RT DATE: May 27, 1981 TO: Planning Commission FROM- Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Capital Improvements Program 1981 -82 Attached for Planning Commission review and approval is the 1981 -82 Capital Improvements budget and a revised Long Range Capital Improvements Study. The current Capital Plan is basically a continuation of last year's program into the-current year. One exception is the proposed Base Line Widening which will be constructed as a cooperative project with the condominium develop- ment on the northwest corner of Base Line and Hermosa. Also attached for your information is a copy of the road needs analysis recent- ly submitted to the City Council and an analysis memo on current legislation being heard in the State Legislature. I will review at the meeting the long range needs with t`e Commission but will not be seeking approval of the proposed priority listings at this time. If the Commission wishes, Engineering would reschedule a mere detailed analysis of the Capital Improvement needs for the future. RECOMMENDATION It is requested that the Commission adopt the attached resolution finding the proposed Capital Improvements Program for 1981 -82 consistent with the General Plan and recommending approval to the City Council. Respectfully submitted, G LBH:jaa Attachments ITEM K u RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF 1981 -82 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM AND FINDING OF CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN. WHEREAS, on the 27th day of May, 1981 the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the attached proposed Capital Improvements Program; and WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission concurs in the recommended program as proposed; and WHEREAS, the proposed program conforms to the Elements of the General Plan NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby: SECTION 1: Find that the attached Capital Improvement Program is in conformance with the General Plan of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 2: Recommends approval of the attached proposed ' Capital Improvements Program for the 1981 -82 fiscal year to the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga for its adoption. APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THIS_ day of 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: _ Richard Dahl, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK. LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamorga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission o; the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of May, 1981, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 11 f:J PROPOSED 1981 -82 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM REVENUE SUMMARY Gas Tax (2106, 2107) SB 325 Systems Development Funds Federal Aid Urban Funds (Restrictea.) Federal Grade Crossing Funds (Restricted) Community Block Grant Funds (Ik�stricted) Toi al Revenue EXPENDITURE SUMMARY 1. Vineyard Avenue Widening & Sicnals Eighth Street to Arrow Route iFAU) 2. Phase 2 North Town Street Improvements (CDEG) Reid, Feron and Main Streets 3. Deer Creek Bridges 4. Carnelian Street Realignment 5. Sapphire Street Reconstruction 6. Archibald Reconstruction at Banyan and Highland 7. Demens Equestrian Bridge 8. Base Line Widening (cooperative project with Developer) Hermosa East. 9. Assessment District 79 -1 Design Total $232,458; $305,101 $420,000 $340,000 $ 76,725 i $163,965 $1,538,249 $480,000; $163,965 $258,241 $400,000 $ 21,000`, $ 30,000 $ 15,000 0140,000 $ 30,n43 1I $1,538,249 I, I A 0 STORM DRAIN FUNDS ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAII.ABLF. PROJECT SUMMARY 1. Lesign Assessment District 79-_ (Loan 1 year) 2. Design Beryl - Redhill Storm Drain 3. Misc. Design and Plznning Studies 4. Misc. Construction Drainage Facilities Sapphire @ Banyan - Extend Catch Basins 4th Street ? Archbald - Add Catch Basin Beryl @ 19th Street - Pdd Catch Basin and nuisance drain Total El k' $601;364 $400,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $100,364 $601,365 4 A C CITY OF RAN© O CUC VVIONGA S AFF ]PEA OIC DATE: May 20; 1981 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Status of Streets and Highway Needed Attached for Council review is the Proposed 1981 -82 Capital Improve- ment Progra_a and the Long Range Capital Program. The proposed bud- get for next year deals primarily with a continuation of previously initiated pr ,.ects and restricted federally funded projects. The. Base Line Widening is proposed in anticipation of a cooperative project with the ccndominium development on the northwest corner of Base Line and Hermosa. If it appears that this project does not proceed within the year these funds could be diverted. The Long Range Capital needs have been completely re- established this year to insure a fresh evaluation of needs. This inventory has been segregated into four categories. • Major Projects • Arterial Resurfacing and Reconstruction • Special Projects • Traffic Signals All of these projects exclusive of grade separations and interchange work are now needs that should be accomplished as quickly as possibl< The total needs are estimated at - approximately $7,500,000. of this amount, the most sensitive areas for consideration are the arterial and local street resurfacing and reconstruction. These projects total approximately $2,000.000.00. All of these projects are currently retmired and many have been deferred already for seve years. No funds are_ available this year to accomplish any of this work. As the ^ouncil is aware. the c�)ntinu:3 deferral of this maintenance will double and triple the cost of repairs and result in incr -ased demand for routine surface patching from our maintena crews. Assuming a 20 year reconstruction life on the current 230 mile sys- tem, the normal road maintenance budget should approach $1.3 millio, Road maintenance is funded primarily throigh gas tax revenues and 1� tax on a oline Gax tar is currently a set 7 cents per gallc sa.._s g STAFF REPORT Status of Streets May 20, 1981 Page 2 and Highways Needed E-7 and has been at that level since 1963. In recent years, with increased fuel efficiency of the auto fleet, and the effects of construction inflation have resulted it dramatic decreases in the funds available for street maintenance and improvement. The attached table demonstrates these impacts. The total street budget available this year is broken down as follows: ° Gax Tax $424,193 ° SB 325 Sales Tax $556,804 TDA Systems Development $420,000 Total funds available are $1,400,997 The primary claim on these funds zn:! the routine maintenance and administration which totals $525,716. The remaining $875,281 is assignable to projects. It should be pointed out that the City's routine maintenance service levels are at a minimum acceptable level of service and are signifi- r -ntly below comparable Cities in tree trimming and street sweeping. tti so, the Council should be aware that the estimated $420,000 in Systems Funds depends on a level of growth which substartially increases the current traffic hazards and management problems. If the growth levels are no.; normal, these funds could significantly decrease. :•rom these figures it can be seen that the City is operating at a normal defic�sncy of $400,000 without addressing increased maintenance due to growth or accomplishing any major capital improvements. In summary, without a significant increase in revenues available for road maintenance and improvements. this City and all road departments throi;ghout the State are facing a total deterioration of our streets and :iighways with the next 20 years. Rancho Cucamonga in all of this, is somewhat more fortunate than other Cities. Our City road system, because of recent growth, is relatively new and maintenance, therefore, somewhat lower titan older amities. Also, with our strong growth pattern, we are able to supplement traditional sources of fends through fee supports. No growth older Cities have neither of these advantages. We will, however, lose this advantage each year as the responsibilities of development replace the opportunities and the City ages and becomes more sta.)Ie. 11 0 r] 01r.rr nr,rQIU Status of Streets May 20, 1981 Page 3 RECOMMENDATIONS IONS and Highways Needed The road problems outlined in this memo place before the City three challenges: 1. To fully consider road needs in the balance of municipal services to provide the safest most co t effective system 'possible. 2. To consider fully the ongoin responsibilities of growth to the fiscal stability of the City and try to balance those resE- isi.bili- ties with the opportunities. 3. To assist other agencies and poli.c- boards in developing funds to equitably provide : ?or the maintenance of our streets and highways. It is the third challenge that is currently bung addressed by the Foray. Bill (SB215), which was summarized in my April 1, 1981 memo to Council. This Bill which recently passed the Senate will add an insufficient but badly needed two cents to '.-he gax tax along with other financial supplements. These changers would begin in 1983 and are broadly recognized to be only a holding action to arrest the deterioration of inflation. Further ir— reases are needed now and will be needed in the future. To lerd the City' full support to these efforts, it is recommended that the attached resolution be executed and transmitted to legislators. but beyond that the Council as individuals need to commit to educating the community to this problem to garner a broad based support to ma;.n- tain our transportation system. No action is required on the Capital Improvements Program prior to approval by the Planning Commission. Respectfully submitted, }AAA i IBH : j as Attachments PRIORITY 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. ENGINEERING DIVISION LONG RANGE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT PRIORITIES MAJOR PR. JECT PRIORITY STREET LIMITS /DESCRIPTION Vineyard Avenue Eight St. to Arrow Rte. (FAU) Widening and Signals Carnelian Street Vineyard to Church Realign Curves Base Line Road East and West of Hermosa Widening and Reconstruction Hellman Avenue @ Foothill Blvd. Widening, Drainage and Signals Grove Avenue Eighth to Foothill Widening, Signal Modifications Hellman Avenue Base Line to SPRR Widening and Drainage Wilson Avenue @ Alta Loma Channel Culvert Crossing Turner Avenue: @ Foothill Blvd. Signals, Widening, Drainage Hermosa Avenue @ SPRR Widening and Drainage Hellman. Avenue @ AT &SF RR Widening and Drainage Turner Avenue @ AT &SF RR Widening and Drainage Ramona Avenue @ SPRR Widening and Drainage Hellmar, Avenue San Bernardino Rd. to Church St. Widening Arch:bal� Avenue 19th St. to Highland Ave. Realignment anc Widening Beryl Avenue Lemon to 500 It. North tdidenir', and Recorstruction ESTIMATED COST $480,000 $400,000 $140,000 $350,000 $762,500 $327,200 $ 30,000 $300, 0�"0 $350,000 $350,000 $330,000 $350,000 $ 85,800 $ 84,000 $ 30,000 3 WRIORITY STREET Liri1iS /DLSCRIP'!'IO ^T z FSTIMATED COST 16. Arrow Route Archibald to Haven Widening $ 82,000 17. Church Street Center. to Haven Widening $ 73,200 18. Base Line Road Alta Cuesta to S 34,900 West City Limits $4,559,600 W" n• , ENGINEERING DIVISION LONG RANGE CAPIT L IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM ARTERIAL RESURFACING AND RECONSTRUCTION PRIORITIES Aft PRIORITY Smr;crT LIMITS /DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED COST 1• Carnelian Street Highland to Banyan Resurfa ' $150,000 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. f, cing Archibald Avenue Minor Reconstruction S/O Highland Avenue $ 30,000 S/O Banyan Sapphire Street Thoroughbred to Jannet $ 21,000 Reconstruction Hermosa Avenue S/O Nineteenth Street to Victoria $ 26.000 Resurfacing nrchibald Avenue Fourth to Nineteenth Street $400,000 Resurfacing (Phased) Victoria Avenue Pecan to Etiwanda $ 20,000 Resurfacing Lcmon Avenue Hermosa to Cartilla $ 16,500 Resurfacing Base Line Road I -15 to Etiwanda $ 22, Widening and Resurfacing Hillside Road Amcthyst to Beryl $ 40,000 Resurfacing Hillside Road Rancho Wash'to Carnelian $ Resurfacing 20,000 Beryl Avenue Manzanita to Hillside $ 50,000 Resurfacing Hermosa Avenue S/O Victoria St. (see #4) Resurfacing Heilman Avenue Church Street to Base Line $ 32,000 Resurfacing Church Street Archibald to Hellman $ 32.000' Resurfacing Carnelian Street Banyan to Demens Channel $ 31,000 Resurfacing AghPIORITY STREET LIMITS /DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED COST 16. East Avenue Nineteenth Street to Summit $ 46,500 Resurfacing 17. Etiwanda Avenue Foothill to 23rd Street $150,000 Resurfacing (Phased) 18. Ar.;ethyst Street Various N/O Nineteenth Street (see 425) Resurfacing 19. Ninth Street Vineyard to Grove $ 36,800 Resurfacing 20. Hellman Avenue Cucamonga Creek to Arrow $ 31,000 Resurfacing and Reconstruction 21. Turner Avenue Fourth Street to 26th Street S 38,500 Resurfacing 22. Vineyard Avenue Carnelian to Base Line $ 27,000 Resurfacing 23. Baker Street 8th Street to 9th Street $ 20,500 Resurfacing W4. Beryl Avenue Base Line to Banyan $ 49,500 Resurfacing 25. Amethyst Avenue Base Line to Highland $ 40,000 Resurfacing 26. Hillside Road Archibald to Haven $ 35,000 Resurfacing 27. Base Line Road Haven to Etiwanda $ 77,500 28. Arrow Route Vineyard, to Baker $ 40,000 29. Banyan Street Beryl to Carnelian $ 61000 30. Highland Avenue Archibald to Hermosa S 10,000 31. San Bernardino Rd Arcl..bal-1 to Hellman $ 35,000 32. Fourth Street (N /S)Cuca.nonga Creek to Hellman $135,000 $1,668,800 ENGINEERING DIVISION LONG RANGE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM SPECIAL PROJECTS PROJECT DESCRIPTION Guard Rail Replacement Turner @ Church Hellman @ Foothill Hellman @ 8th Street Turner @ 8th Street Turner " Foothill. Haven Avenue, Deer Creek to Highland Avenue Alley Reconstruction S/O Foothill - Archibald to Klusman N/O Foothill - E/O Archibald @ Court House N/O Base Line W/O Citv Offices S/O Foothill W/O and parallel to Archibald N/O Arrow - Hellman to Carnelian E/O Archibald S/O & Parallel to Foothill Blvd. Milliken Avenue Grade Separation at Santa Fe Railroad (R /W Protection) Haven Avenue Grade Separation at Santa Fe Railroad (P./W Protection) Seventh Street Interchange with-I-15 Include kR /W Protection) Foothill Interchange with I -15 (R /W Protection) Demens Channel Equestrian Bridge at Jasper Street Deer Creek Bridge ,uetterments Local Street Resurfacing /Seal Coats (see attached map) (current backlog) Future.LJCal Street Resurfacing /Seal Coats ESTIMATED COST 1* $ 4,800 6,930 $ 27,000 $ 6,900 $ 20,100 $ 345,000 $ 3.',000 $ 7,600 $ 18,000 $ 4,200 $ 5,600 $ 48,600 $5,104, 000 $3,176,000 No Cost No Cost $ 15,000 $258,2A]. 350,000 $100,000 11 00 0 RECOMMENDED PRIORITY E i N RECOMMENDED TRAFFIC SIGNAL PRIORITY INTERSECTION Carnelian and Lemon Archibald and Fourth 3 Modify Grove and Arrow 4 Archibald and Sixth Street 5 Carnelian and San Bernardino Rd 6 7 a 9 10 ll 12 13 14 15 16 <^-.;:chibald and 19th Street STATUS To be completed by developer Under study by C. LTRANS Base Line and Beryl Street Modify Grove and San Bernardino Rd Modifv Grove and Ninth Street Vineyard and Ninth Street 1 °'•:h Street and Beryl Street 19th Street and Amethyst 19th Street and Hellman Avenue Sapphire and 19th Street Foothill and Red Hill Country Club Dr Archibald and Nint_ - Street ESTIMATED COST $60,000 50,000 60,000 80,000 60,000 60,000 50,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 60,000 50,000 TOTAL $910,000 Heilman and Foothill - high priority if ShC and SEC developments to go in. Move to a2. DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAi1-IONGA MEMORANDUM April 1, 1981 City Council and City Manager Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer Transportaticn Financing I recently had t e opportunity to attend the League of Public Works Officers Conference in Sacramento. The major topic of this confer- ence was the tremendous lack of funding to maintain and develop the State highway, Roads and Streets system. As I'm sure the Council is aware that we are currently on the verge of losing the finest high- way systems in the world and along with it the primary capital asset of the State and its cities and Counties. The League through its Public works Division has determined that the time has come to make the public aware of what it is about to lose and to develop support in the Legislature for a program to save this investment. The League is sponsoring a bill authored by Senator John Foran. Thi bill is SB215 and is summarized in the attached material. The bill basically raises license and rser fees, protects all gasoline sale taxes for transportation uses and raises the gas tax by two (2) cents per gallon_ The erosion of gax tax funds have been dramatically demonstrated in a report prepared by the California Transportation Commission which shows the dramatic loss of value of transportation funding. Most Cities have been forced to completely delete roadway construction a,d have begun to defer maintenance for extended periods. Mdst *ajor maintenance programs vary from 10 to 25 years, depending upon ' raffle volumes, severity of climate. Because cf revenue shortages, the scheduled ^ycles have been extended repeatedly, until they have I become meaningless. The City of Oakland's resurfacing program pre- sently budgeted 5 miles per year of '-otal maintained miles of 778. The impact of maintenance deferal is a false ecor_omy which if not stopped will result in a near total failure of the system and immense reconstruction cost. The CTC report points out that "The difference between resurfacing a road after 15 years of service compared to after 20 years of service is approximately a four -fold increase, assuming constant dollar ". "The cost of properly maintair,i -ng a roadway is estimated to to one quarter the cost of rehabilitating a road that has been allowed to deteriorate and one -tenth the cost of completely rebuilding it ". 13 Aprii i, 1981 Page 2 Because the resid_ -atial street mileage within Rancho Cucamonga is so new only 20% of our 220 mile system is beginning to require rehabilitation. The major street system requires extensive and in some cases, constant attention. Ena-neering is currently quantify- ing these needs and will be uresenting *_hose needs to the "ouncil as a part of the budget process. At that time, it is hoped that the Council will strongly support the Fortin Bill and will carefully con- sider street needs within the City_ The Foran Bill is only a holding action which will arrest the deteri- oration. To deal effectively with the problem will require much stronger action and "irther tax increases. The Council has the opportunity to take- a lead in raving our road system. Respectfully submitted, LBH:jaa Attachments cc: Jack Lam Paul Rougeau Monte Preacher Dave-. Leonard Barry Hogan ;j March 12, 1981 SENATE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE John Francis Foran, Chairman ANALYSIS - S.B. No. 215 ( Foran) P.s Amen ed Fe rua�y 3, 9 Subject: Transportation financing. DESCRIPTION S This bill would increase various Motor B Vehicle Account fees and the gallonage tax on gasoline and diesel fuel. The bulk of these 2 increases would be rhasad in over a three -year I period, beginning in 1982- The bill also would shift gradually revenues generated by the sales tax on gasoline from the General Fund to the E State Highway .account and local transportation funds. I N The key are;.; and features of the bill are: A . N Motor Vehicle Account C E o Vehicle registration fees would be increased Y from the present $11 to $19 in 1982, $21 in .E 1983 and $22 in 1984. Feea for the transfer S of registration and-duplicate registrations would increase from $3 to $7 upon passage of the bill. a Driver's license fees would increase from the Present $3.25 to $8 in 1982, $10 in 1983 and $12 in 1984. Identification cards would increase from 83 to $6, except for senior citizens who would continue to pay $3. ° Commercial truck weight fees would increase by a cumulative total of 40 percent in 1982, 50 percent in 1983 and 60 percent in 1984. The bill would require that all weight fee revenues, less the costs the Stat of collections, be deposited in e.Highwa}• Account rather than the Motor Vehicle Account. more...::':.... CI - ._.._ - win _ .. sB 215 (Foran) -2- ' March 12, 1931 a Fees for trin permits and the registration of out -of -state vehicles also would be railed from S5 and $6, respectively, to $10. s The Secretary of toe Business, Transportation and Huusing Agency would be required to submit a report to the Legislature by January 10, 1985 on the adequacy of fees charged for support Of state overations funded from the i:otor Vehicle Account. Followup reports would be required on a periodic basis. Fral Taxes The existing 7 cents- per - gallon tax on motor vehicle fuel would be increased by 2 cents per gallon, beginning in 1983 One cent of the increase would be retained by the state wh; !,'- 0e other cert would be allocated to cities and counties. a If the federal fuel tax of 4 cents per gallon was reduced, the state fuel tax would be increased by the same amount so that the combined federal and state fuel tax rate equals 13 cents per gallon. s An additional, one- -time, alloc ;.tion of $100 million in fuel tax revenues would be made to cities and counties during 1982 -83 for streets and roads purposes. o Cities and counties for the first time would share in diesel fuel tax revenues. o .-ovnties would he permitted to impose an additional fuel tax, in cne -cent increments, if 1) voters approve the increase, and 2) the revenues are used for the transportation purposes specified in Article XIv of the California Constitution. more.......... SB 215 (Foran) -3- March 12, 1981 m Counties .could be required to contract with the State Board of Equalization for administra- tion of any county Juel tax and payment of the costs of adminis +_rat ion. ° Seventy percent of 'he State Highway Account funds used for new s!onstruction would be allocated to countiets on the basis of each county's contribution to the account. The remaining 30 percen: would be allocated by the California Tran mortation Cmmmission on a statewide neads basis. ° The authority of tla> California Transportation Commission to pay tae cost of toll bridge maintenance from toll bridge revenues would be deleted. Payment of these maintenanr; expenses would be grade from the State Highway Account, as provided in current law. Sai:--- Tax on Fuel o Spillover" revenues from the sales tax on motor vehicle fuel 'which currently are retained in the Genfnral Fund, gradually would be shifted to transportation uses. The bill would cap the General Fund fuel sales tax revenue at $150 millicn in '981 -82 and reduce this amount by $30 millicn arnual'y ($120 million in 1982 -83, $90 million in 1983 -84, etc.) o One -half of the sales tax revenues shifted from the General Fund would be transferred to the State Highway Accoun: and one -half would be a3.loceted :;o local a4rencies for streets and highway and transit purposes. itevenua C_ hanges (in millio zs ) ----------------- 1981 1982 1983 1984 1535 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 State Revenue Increase Mctor Vehicle Account $112 $103 $146 $165 $169 State Highway Account 29 205 313 331 337 Local Revenue Increase TOTAL REVENUE INCREASE Transfer from General Fund To State Highway Acc' *_. To Local Agencies $ _6 $100 $168 $172 5176 $141 $408 $627 $668 $682 -36 -118 -3.90 • 228 -258 $ 18 $ 59 $ 95 $114 $129 18 59 95 114 129 :.l] El er• "9rN k K.a fa�dnuv., COW5 WO.w lagrlhr, L.4z,3gue of %a§fbnfia Cities o a Y a m JOINT STATEMENT BY THE COUNTY SUPERVISORS ASSOCIATION Or CALIFORNIA AND THE' LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES REGARDING THE TRANSPORTATION FUNDING CRISIS AT THE CITY AND COUNTY LEVEL IN CALIFORNIA. The County Supervisors Association of California (CSAC) and the League of California Cities (LCC) recognize the need to increase local road and street financing. The two 0^Z'-11' atk ns join in a cooperative effort to ensure that this serious crisis is addressed by the Legislature. The facts can no longer be ignored without serious fiscal and program corsecu2nces. As a pedestrian, cyclist, transit patron or driver, we are dependent upon a system tof �p city streets, county roads and state highways. As consumers, the cost we pay for delivery of goads and services is aLo directly related to this same system of roadways. The lower the service level this system provides, the higher the user costs. Directly related user costs ai ected by this lower service include vehicle repairs, maintenance and depreciation, fuel consumption and insurance premiums. Often overlooked related costs include delays, exposure io iuAzards and the cost fol' the delivery of goods and SeiVICCS. The condition of the roadway system in the State of California is in serious jeopardy due to a lack of funding. The Census Bureau has reported that California ranks the lowest of all states in per capita expenditure for highways. Reduced governmental expu,iditures for highways -are neither cost, effective nor eaunomical if the result is higher total costs to the consumer. Adequate road and street maintenance and timely safety improvements need an adequate funding base. Such expenditures can substantially reduce other user costs. California is experiencing a rapid decline in transportation capital investment, safety improvements and just plain maintenance. There has been recent press coverage of the state highway system revenue s;iortfall. The disastrous impact on county roads and city streets has not yet received the same coverage as the state highway needs; yet, the bulk of the transportaticn system is in local facilities, and the local needs are accelerating as the revenues decrease. Not all cities and counties have identical problems due to differences ranging from age of existing facilities, expansion and development potential, shifting population patterns, terrain and seasonal differences, etc.; but, all local agencies are experiencing the effects of inflation and rising costs with declining resources. Severe effects include reduced maintenance capability, increased tort liability exposure, inability to respond to safety installations, and inability to maintain viable improvement programs. As existing systems deteriorate the cost to cure the resulting Droblems drastically increases. One measure often used is that one dollar of timely maintenance now will save it ten dollars )f reco-struct on five years rom now. oad and street matntenunce and nru. -nnt nnMtai trnnrnvr_ments cost 0 ars. ne cost of highway maintenance and construction has increased at the average rate of 18% per annum for the last five years. The value of the present 7x gas tax is approximately 1/3 of the purchasing power of the original 7t rate authorized in 1963. The purchasing power continues to erode each year (Attachment). Recent testimony by local agencies before the Transportation Committees of the Legislature illustrate the dramatic impacts of the current revenue shortfall. In Yolo County it has been necessary tc scarify existing paved roads back to a gravel status because the existing paving could not be maintained in a safe condition. The City of Oakland's preventive maintenance resurfacing program is rapidly approaching a cycle length of 200 years while it is recognized that a maximum of a 30 -year cycle length is the extreme range of a cost effctive program. Many cities and counties have drastically curtailed recognized maintenance programs Involving minor street paving, traffic sign maintenance and street cleaning, and are struggling to maintain a minimum hard maintenance program. Caltrans, private and local government studies indicate that it would tLke at least an an..r t -damns n requireo to effectively serve transportation needs including �safe �uand serviceable Pavements for automobile traffic, transit vehicle use, goods delivery in an environment maintenance that enhances air quality and provides for saving of energy, cannot be provided without a reasonable revenue base. The same studies indicate that it would take an additional $500 million per year to return marnteranee reha 1rtatwn and ooeratrona prozra.ms to a SC'lenUte Inat DCOreets r a n..nnc. „, _ ..--- _ Other factors have also contributed to the deterioration of city and county highway systems. These include the following: 1. Age The local system of streets and roads is getting older. Timely maintenance can Is still reduce the need for major repairs and reconstruction. Due to the age of the existing system, this can no longer be deferred without accelerated deterioration. 2. Truck Weights maximum The niimpact 4 studies clearly indicate h aver vehicles have a definite and acceleratedeteriorat o of roadways. At the loeal level these conditions have been exacerbated by the already serious funding crisis as most small trips begin and end on local roads. 3. Increasing ;Mobility Trends and Improved Fuel Economy While total fuel consumption has moJestly decreased, vehicle fuel efficiency has dramatically increased. The result is more use of the roadways which has accelerated the deterioration and increased the need for safety and operational improvements. Local agencies have historically supplemented highway user fees to provide required transportation needs. Proposition 13 and Proposition 4 have severely curtailed the ability of local government to continue to allocate general funds to transportation needs in the struggle to allocate dirninishing resources to needs. We feel proposals to increase the gas tax and other user fees to provide increased support of transportation needs including local agency needs should be strongly supported. The evidence of the needs is overwhelming. Such new state revenue is the only way to ensure that a viable transportation system can be maintained at all levels in California —state highways, county roads and city streets. 3�. ITEM L CITY OFAR� RANCHO Cyt�]IC WONGA cvcnr,�r� �a DATE: May 27, 1981 p _ } T0: Members of the Planning Commission U FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner 1977 BY: Dan Coleman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: CABLE T.V. IKRODUCTION: Recently, in conjunction with the approval of tentative tract maps, questions have been raised concerning cable television. - What areas of Rancho Cucamonga already have Cable T.V.? - Who is responsible for installing a cable system, and who pays for the installation? - What is Cable T.V.? If - Do we need it in Rancho Cucamonga? - If Cable T.V. is desirable, should the Planning Commission require developers to install cable as a condition of ap- proval on a subdivision? This report explains cable television in layman's terms, and provides background material necessary to answer these questions. WHAT IS CABLE T.V.? Cable television began on a modest scale in the late 1940's as a means of delivering television signals to areas unable to receive over -the -air T.V. channels because they were too far from the trans- mitters or obstructed by mountains. By installing an antenna on top of the mountain or closer to the transmitter, a stronger signal could be sent via cable to the home television set. Thus, in its early days, cable was primarily a way of improving reception. Advances in the state -of- the -art have created.a billion dollar a year cable tele- vision industry. With the advent of satellite programming, dish an- tennas can now pick up and relay signals from satellites, making it possible to offer a wide spectrum of entertainment choices for the T.V. viewer. There are two kinds of cable T.U. hookups: Basic Cable: A consumer pays an installation charge and a monthly fee to have his T.V. set hooked up to cable. This enables the viewer to watch all twelve VHF channels, including some out -of -the -area stations, and possibly more UHF channels. Basic cable is used primarily by the consumer for better reception. ITEM L Carle 27 1981 Page Two Efyi_Cable: For extra.monthly charges the consumer can purchase premium services, such as Home Box Office, Show - time, or "Z" channel. Any such service that a subscriber receives through cable is considered pay cable. What the consumer really pays for is a "convertor box" for the television set that enables it to receive additional chan- nels. Pay cable systems, which can bring up to 64 channels, typically offer uncut movies, 24 -hour sports channels, Con- gressional coverage, religious channels, children's and adult programming, Spanish- speaking channels, and in some areas, even local city council meetings. Cable television faces competition from other non -cable pay -T.V. services: Subscription Television: The consumer pays the usual in- stallation charge and monthly fee in return for a "decoder box" that decodes or unscrambles a transmission for recep- tion on the television set. In Southern California, the two largest subscription television (STV) operators, ON -TV and SELECT -TV, offer movies and sports. As a non -cable system, STV offers only one channel and television reception is not improved. Multipoint Distribution Service: A television transmission is delivered, via microwaves, to a home dish antenna con- nected to the TV set. The consumer pays an installation charge and monthly fee to lease the antenna. The problem with multipoint distribution service (MOS) is a limited range of 25 miles and it requires the receiving antenna to be in the line of sight of the transmitter. Satellite Television: Potentially cable T.V.'s biggest competitor is direct satellite to home transmission. In this case each house would have its own dish antenna capable of receiving as many signals as the satellite can beam, thus making each home a private cable system. Home Box Office customers can pay $125 for an antenna unit to receive HBO's satellite programming in areas without cable. rM I, P Cable T.J. Play 27, 1981 Page Five HOW CABLE T. V. WORKS The problem with conventional television boradcasts is that some. stations have less powerful transmitters than others. That's why Channel 2 may come in "picture perfect" on your T,V, set, while Channel 13 reception is weak, and "snowy ". To resolve this problem, cable operators place amplifiers in the cable every 1 to 2 thousand feet to maintain the strength or "integrity" of the signal, There- fore, in a cable system, the television set receives, all channels. at virtually the same optimum signal strength. All cable systems start with a "head -in" station that consists of a separate T.V. antenna for each channel. The function of the head- in station is to receive and amplify each channel for distribution to the home. Those cable systems featuring satellite programming also have an "earth" or "ground" station with a large dish antenna to receive satellite transmissions, from these receiving stations the T.V. signal is sent to a community via a main trunk cable, Ge- nerally speaking, trunk cable is an overhead line hung on the same poles as telephone and electric lines; this is known as an aerial plant. Smaller cable, known as distribution or feeder line, branches off from the trunk and delivers the television signal to each tract.. The State Subdivision Map Act requires all utilities to be installed underground in new subdivisions, This means that cable companies are unable to use an aerial plant for their feeder lines, and therefore, lay their di,stri.bution lines up each street in the same trench with the utilities. There are two kinds of underground plant for cable television: direct - buried and dry -line (conduit). The direct- buried system uses "armored" cable that has a protective layer of corrugated metal. This type of cable is laid directly into the trench, in a bad of sand. A dry -line system means that cable is run through PVC plastic conduit fbr protection. Both types of under- ground plant use "flooded and jacketed" cable that is treated wi.th.a special water proofing compound, A device called a tap is used to connect the lateral "drop" cable to the house with the distrubiton line in the street. Each tap is enclosed in a concrete or plastic vault called a tap box, which normally occurs every four homes. Sometimes an above - ground pedestal enclosure is used for a tap, usually in the backyard. Each. home, in turn, is "wired" with wall outlets for the cable, similar to a phone May 27,,1981 Cable T.V. Page Three The programming possibilities for cable television are virtually in- finite, depending only upon what the consumer is willing to pay for. The list below, from Theta Cable T.V.,is an example of the wide va- riety of programming currently available to the cable T.V. consumer. Channel Setting Prognttntninp, 'Z THE'T'A MOTION PICTURES 2 KNXT CH. 2 C.B.S 3 Theta Channel 3 4 KNBC CH. 4 N.B.C. 5 KTLA CH. 5 IND. 6 KCET CH. 28 P.B.S. 7 KABC CH. 7 A.B.C. 8 KMEX CH. 34 IND./ Sports Headlines 9 KHI CH. 9 :ND. 10 KWHY CH. 22 IND. 11 KTTV CH. I1 IND. 12 KBSC CH. 52 IND. 13 KCOP CH. 13 IND. A SHOWTIME (New Subscriplion TV Service. Movies, Las Vegas and Broadway .Cgecialx) B KVCR CH. 24 P.II.S. C Comparative Shopping Guide D Local Time and Weather/ 24 Hour Service E Local School. Educational Use F KSCI CH. 18 Financial News —UPI G New Yerk Stock Exchange H - KHOF CH. 30 REL. I KTBN CH. 40 REL. 1 WTBS 24 -Hour Super Station front Atlanta. Exciting Sports. Movies, Features. K ESPN All- Sports Satellite Channel. 17+ Hours Per Day. NCAA /Pr5 Sports. L KLCS CH. 58 ED. M Satellite Programming: CNN. (Turner 24 -Hour All -News Station). La Vcrne residents — see Channel 3. N Satcliite Programming Guide. ESPN /WTBS O Sports Scorchoard/ 24 Hour Service (Music Background Muted). P Recreational Weather News /24 -Hour Service WHO HAS CABLE T.V. IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA? Like a public utility, cable companies can only d o awarded a franchise from the local governing body. County Board of Supervisors awarded non- exclusive cable T.V. operators for the Rancho Cucamonga are a These franchises do not specify levels of service business if they are The San Bernardino franchises to four t prior to incorporation. or define service areas. Ej Cable T.V. May 27, 1981 Page Four One franchise holder, Six -Star Cablevision presently does not provide service ir; the City. The oldest cable company in Rancho Cucamonga, Visual Enterprises Venture, laid cable twelve years ago in Alta Loma. Visuals` 7G) subscribers receive all VHF and UHF channels plus Home Box C'ffice ',movies and sports). Cable T.V. of Alta Loma has 1,985 subscribers and offers 17 channels and "Z" channel (movies). In the Cucamonga area, Theta Cable T.V. offers its 800 customers 27 channels, "Z" channel (Theta Motion Pictures), and Showtime (movies, Las Vegas and Broadway specials). The map below indicates table T.V. service areas as of January 1981. CABLE TV SERVICE AREAS Cable TV of Alta Loma Theta Cable TV CZX Visual Fnttwmea Ventura Cable T.V. May 27, 1981 Page Six jack outlet. In the case of basic cable service, a cable runs from the wall outlet to the television set. If the consumer has pay cable service, with a converter, then the cable goes through the converter to the T.V. INSTALLATION COSTS Because of the high cost of installing cable infrastructure, it is estimated that for the next 10 years, the cable T.V. industry will need $14 billion in capital to build nek, systems end rebuild old ones. The high cost is attributed to the large number of cost va- riables involved; such as, the type of plant, when the cable is installed (during or after completion of a tract), soil type, and the number of street intersection crossings. All of these factors can significantly affect the cost of laying cable and any figures used herein should be interpreted with this in mind. The most important financial consideration to a cable company, in terms of installing cable, is when the cable is laid. Normally, cable is laid in the same trench with utilities during construction. This saves the cable company the cost of trenching, which can range from $5,000 a mile in good soil to $11,000 a mile in the rocky soil of Alta Loma. The price for laying underground cable is about $12,000 a mile for dry -line and $8,000 a mile -for direct - buried. Theta Cable T.V. uses a dry-line system for their installation; citing the high maintenance costs associated with direct- buried cable as the reason for using conduit. Cable laid using the direct - buried system, although it has a protective casing, is susceptible to damage from rocks that can dent the cable. Repair of direct - buried cable requires excavation to expose the cable for repair; hence, the added cost of trenching, backfilling, and repairing. In a dry -line system, "pull boxes" are spaced along the conduit with a rope inside that is used to pull cable free of the conduit for repairs. Cable T.V. of Alta Loma and Visual Enterprises Venture prefer a direct - buried system because of the lower capital outlay for instal- lation. Because of the high cost of laying cable, cable operators are very concerned with the "saturation factor ". the percentage of domes in an area that subscribe to cable. Most cable companies will o0y provide Cable T.V. May 27, 1981 Page Seven cable service in areas where they can expect a 40 -50 percent sub- scription rate. "It takes a 33 -35 percent subscription rate just to break even," according to Don Canfield of Theta Cable T.V. Cable T.V. is a high -risk business; accordingly, cable companies expect a 19 to 20 percent return on their investment. Cable T.V. of Alta Loma estimates that they must reach or "expose" fifty homes per mile of plant (at a 50% saturation factor) to make a reasonable profit. Therefore, cable companies will not run underground cable to a new area Just to expose a small tract of 20 or 30 homes. If, however, reception in this area was so poor that they could expect a 90 to 100 percent subscription rate, or if CC &Rs prohibited antennas, then -it would be economically justifiable to lay trunk or distri- bution lines. ANALYSIS: in considering attaching conditions to tentative tract maps to require cable installation, not only should the cost to extend cable company distribution and trunk lines be considered, the cost per unit to the developer and the need for cable should be analyzed. One of the problems in discussing cable T.V. is the disparity in cost per dwelling unit figures used by various groups or individuals. The disparity is caused by differences in what these figures represent. in terms of actual cable installation: discussing figures on installation of a cable system is futile unless everyone agrees upon what goes into that cable system.' Case in point: the following condition was attach- ed to a recent approval of a tract in Upland. Underground utility services shall include dry -line Cable T.V. facilities. Provided further, that all dwelling units shall be pre -wired for Cable T.V. service. This type of "blanket condition" doesn't specify the size of conduit, number of pullboxes, or how many cable T.V. outlets each home should have. On the basis of this condition, it would be difficult to ar- rive at a meaningful estimate of the cost per house. To supply each house in a subdivision with cable requires 100 -200 feet of conduit (depending upon lot width and setbacks). A 2 -inch PVC conduit costs about 50t a foot, therefore, the cost of con- duit per house is $50 to $60. Add to this the cost of pre- wiring each home, labor, and pull boxes, and the total cost of providing cable ser- vice begins to escalate. (In the City of Rancho Cucamonga, our standard condition at this time requires the developer to provide cable televi- sion conduit only.) For example, a recent 125 -lot subdivision in Ontario cost about $60 to $70 per house to install a simple dry -line system, not including the cost of pre - wiring each house. Ron Nottingham, En- gineer for Lewis Homes, estimates that a complete dry -line cable T.V. system would cost $300 per house, including 3 or 4 outlets in each home at $10 apiece; but, unfcrtunately, could not itemize this figure. Using costs supplied by the various Cable TV companies and actual con- struction contracts, the following should be an accurate appraisal of the actual cost to install a dry -line system. Cable T.V. May 27, 1481 Page Nine POLICY OPTIONS The following is a list of policy options available to the Commission with regard to Cable T.V. 1. Allow developers to work freely with cable companies in deciding which tracts should be provided with cable T.V. Basically, a "no policy" stance, would be maintained until the Council considers adoption of an ordinance and franchises. 2. Recommend tb the City Council a franchise ordinance be adopted. 3. Require cable T.V. facilities only in areas of the community with poor reception. 4. Require cable T.V. facilities in poor reception areas which are presently served and accessible to a cable company. 5. Condition all subdivisions to provide cable T.V. facilities in conjunction with the approval of tentative tract. maps. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission review and consider all aspects of this issue, and provide Staff with direction. Res ctfully submitted, R H N it Plan ;n BKH:DC:cd:jk:kp:nm M t IIII ' n Cable T.V. May 27 , 1981 Page E�lht rN $150 to $180 2" PVC Conduit, installed @ $1.50 lineal foot + $22.50 #5 pullbox, installed @ $90 each, 1 box /4 homes $172.50 - 205.00 ;: +al without pre - wiring + $20.00 2 cable vitlets $192.50 - 225.00 Total with pil- -wiring Whatever the installation coat of cable is, if the developer is required by conditions on a tentative map to install cable, the cost will ultimately be transferred to the homebuyer in the price of the home. Regardless of cost, builders resent being required to irstall what they consider to be a luxury, cable T.V., just the same as if a city required them to provide plumbing for a spa on each lot. Ken Willis, of the Building Industry Association, summed up this attitude by saying, "we oppose it on the basis that you are using one industry to subsidize another industry" The BIA feels that cable companies can afford to pay for the installation of conduit through which they will receive profit. Thus, if the cable company pays for the installation, this cost will be transferred to the user as a part of the subscription charge. The need for cable television in the City of Rancho Cucamonga is sup- ported by two thoughts; the growing use of Cable T.V. for entertain- ment and the necessity for proper reception. Proponents of cable tele- vision can argue the need for cable T.V. by pointing to the increasing demand among consumers. In 1968 about 2.8 million, or 5% of the nation's 56 million T.V. homes had cable. Today that figure has climbed to 15.5 million, or 20% of the nation's 76.3 million T.V. homes, and indications are that cable T.V. growth will continue to climb. In "shaded" or poor reception areas, people talk about "needing" cable TV so they can continue to enjoy television. Therefore, the saturation factor (read popularity /demand) in Foothill communities is much higher than in the valley floor. Alta Loma, particularly north of Banyan, is a shaded area and 29% of all homes have cable T.V. The present Cable T.V. companies are operating under a franchise agreement approved and adopted by the County. Unless the City Council adopts its own Cable TV Ordinance, the City cannot specify to cable companies where and how service must be provided. If the Council adopts such an ordinance and grants new franchises, then precise installation requirements could be imposed on the cable company. As it now exists, cable companies will provide service only in areas where economically feasible; i.e., where trunk lines exist and extensions from the main line can be made without substantial cost. Some subdivisions have been pre- wired, but still do not enjoy service because the main trunk line is not in close proximity and may never be, without major improvement costs.