HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981/06/10 - Agenda Packet\V
U�g
l• K � L
C, V.
C
r l
•
1
f 1 L
1�
1
�
LA
i$
\V
U�g
C, V.
C
V
�i
may
m v+
OD -+•
A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 81 -20
GENERAL E PHONE COMPA Y GTE The propose 3,440 _
ft. addition to the existing telephone equipment building
in the R -1 zone located at 6322 East Avenue• APN 225-181 -
25
L� V1• G. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 1981 -82
V1I, Public Hearings
The following items are public hearings in which concerned
individuals may voice their opinion of the related project.
Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address.
the Cemm_.sion from the public microphone by giving your
name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5
minutes, per individual for each project.
OTY OF
*P1
RANCHO GUCP.MONGA
PI ANNING COMMISSION
c
AGENDA
1977
WEDNESDAY JUNE 10, 1981 7:00 P.M.
LION'S PARK COhMUNITY CEMTER
9161 SASE LIRE,.RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
I.
Pledge of Allegiance
IL.
Roll Call
Commissioner Dahl Commissioner Rempei
Commissioner King ~ Commissioner Tolstoy
Commissioner Sceranka
III.
Approval of Minutes
I'V.
Announcements
V.
Consent Caiena ,.- �- � ----^-
The following consent calendar items are expected to be
routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon
by the Commission at one time without discussion. if
anyone has concern over any item, then it should be
removed for di'scussi'on.'
A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 81 -20
GENERAL E PHONE COMPA Y GTE The propose 3,440 _
ft. addition to the existing telephone equipment building
in the R -1 zone located at 6322 East Avenue• APN 225-181 -
25
L� V1• G. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 1981 -82
V1I, Public Hearings
The following items are public hearings in which concerned
individuals may voice their opinion of the related project.
Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address.
the Cemm_.sion from the public microphone by giving your
name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5
minutes, per individual for each project.
;
Planning Commission Agenda
-2- June 10, 1981
C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
NO. -05 - SO H RN CALIFORNIA DISON COMPANY - iTie
6 9 development of an electrical distribution substation
v 7 the northwest corner of .Archibald and Wilson Avenues
APN 1061- 571 -04
vNnuuhlKU VCn1UKt - A VISLOm IOr . sunnivi,sion of z -u
res of and into 6 single family, residential lots in
the 11 -1 -8,500 zone, located west of Sapphire Street at
the western terminus of Garden Ct. - APN 201- 201 -33
ENVIRONMENTAL - ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 1'1663
P. - MARLBOROUGH DEVELOPMENT P ON -
iG W A total development of 413 townhouses onin
J the R -2 zone, located on,the east side of.Arch•i•Sald,
on the south side of Church, west side of Ramona - APN
1 77
0 - 341 -01, 1077 - 133 -08, and 1077 - 631 -03
F- ENVIRONMENTAL. ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP NO. 6596 -
A 11 R,_EQUIPME1T - An Industrial su divfsfon of 4,08
acres o a into 3 parcels within the M-2 zone
located on the northwest corner of San Bernardino
Road and Lucas Ranch•' Road APN 210- 071 -40
"
G.
CONDI'TI'ONAL USE PERMIT NO. 81 -10 - VICTOR D. EASON
Interim use of the business office located, at 9513
7
Business Center Drive, Suite J. for the roursquare
Gospel in Rancho Cucamonga
VIII.
Old
Business
Ix.
New
Business
I
;l
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIE14 NO.
1 - -11 DE SON - The development of a 17,860 sq. ft.
� c�iVl
professional office complex and a 4,050.sq. ft.
restaurant building an 1.84 acres of land in the A -P
zone located or, the west side of Archibald Avenue
approximately 150 feet south of Devon Street - APN
208 - 801 -39 & 40
,
Vf,
' � 1
'�.. 'xy
Planning Commission Agenda -3- .Tune 10, 1481
�A ' / $f -OY.- PRAVER - The d,ve opment of a retail garden
YVt�i/ center on 13 acres of land in the C -2 zone to be
located 100 feet east of Helms on the south side of
Foothill -- APN 208- 261 -0.43 & 044
X. Council deferrals
XI. Director's Reports.
ESTABLISH HEARING SCHEDULE FOR INDUSTRIAL PLAN
t K. SELECTION OF CHAIRMAN AND VIDE - CHAIRMAN (ORAL ) ,
L ETIWANDA SPECUM PLAN
1 MI., Public Comments.
This is the time and place for the general public to
address the Commission. Items•to be discussed here
are those which do not already appear on this agenda_
XIII. Upcoming Agenda
XIV. Adjournment
The P.Iaru2ing Commission has adopted Administrative
,Regulations . that set an 21:00 p.m. adjournment time.
If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only
with the consent of the CO=dssion.
W
Q. W
VI
• r
4
• h V
. 4
u
• •: 3W VONVn1113
Z 71
In m W
•: ,'. a y. • „
j fn 3n7 L31O3M30tl
iu
yi ••�•��•�`• and N3vnvw
CL i rs
vu l� `
an'J n3nrH O
3n'' QIVOIH•lfltl
lly Af
r.11ll.1
t':.. z�
.eat
1z7`' �i• •:
T'
OUV1.3111n
i
J
J �
ti
u �W
Q• W
Y �
N
N m
y,3nN3AV
umna
C.;fT1' OF
RANCHO CUCAIWONGA
PLANNING COMB I,SSION
AGENDA
NDA,
.4
1977
WEDNESDAY JUNI: 10, 1981 7:00 P.M.
LION'S PAP,K COMMUNITY CENTER
§161 BASE LINE,.RANCi:O CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
I.
Pledge of Allegiance
11.
Ro ?l Call
Commissioner Dahl Commissioner Rempei
_
Commissioner King _ Commissioner Tolstoy
_
Commissioner Sceranka
111.
Approval of Minutes
IV.
Announcements
V.
Consent Calendar
The following consent .alendar items are expected to be
routine and non- rontraversi'al. They will be acted upon
by the Commissi'cn at one time without discussion. Tf
anyone has concern over any item, then it should be
removed for discussion.
A, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 81 -20
G NERAL• TELEPHONE COMPANY G E . -• T e prop=4 2,440 sq-
fi. addition to the existing telephone equipment building
in the R -1 zone located at E322 East Avenue - APN 225 -181-
~
25
VI•
B. CAPITAL I14PROVETIENTS PROGRAM 1981=82
VII,
Public Hearings
,y.
The following items are public hearings in which concerned
Individuals may voice their opinion of the related project.
Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address
the Commission from 'the public microphone by giving ycur
name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5
minutes per individual for each project.
tYr�'
,
c
c.
Planning Commission Agenda
-2- June 10, 1981
C.
ENVIRCNMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
"0 �0�C.i - SO RN CALIFO NI 0 ON COMPANY
nterim use of the business office located at 9513
deve opment of an electrical distri ution substation .
Business.Center Drive, Suite J, for the Foursquare
the northwest corner of Rrchibald and Wiisor, Avenues
APN 1061. 571 -04
b•
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO, 1169.6
'
VANG— UVR VENTURE - A custom lot sutatliy�s o n of 2.0
IX. New
Business
acres or land into 6 single family, residential lots in
�'-
H.
the R -1 -8,$00 zone, located west of Sapphire Street at
the western terminus of Garden Ct. - APN 201- 201 -33
51-11 - DEASON - The development of a0 sq. ft.
E.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11663
professt'anhl- office complex and a 4,050. sq, ft.
A G D P, N RPJi2�TI `I -�
townhouses on�0 acres in
total development of 4i-s
the R -2 zone, located on the east, side of Archibald,
zone located or the west side of Archibald. Avenue
on the south side of Church, west side of Ramona - APN
y;
approximately 150 feet south of Devon Street - APN
1077- 341 -01, 1077- 133 -08, and 1077- 631 -03
F-
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP NO. 6596 -
{
W"& R EQUIPMENT - An industrial subrSivision of 4.08
acres oi' and into 3 parcels within the M -2 zone
�-
located on the northwest corner of San Bernardino
Road and Lucas Ranch. Road - APN 210,071 -40
G.
CONDITIONAL USS PERMIT NE. 81 -10.- VIGtUR U, tuaUn
nterim use of the business office located at 9513
Business.Center Drive, Suite J, for the Foursquare
Gospel in Rancho Cucamonga
VIII. Old
Business
IX. New
Business
H.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO.
51-11 - DEASON - The development of a0 sq. ft.
professt'anhl- office complex and a 4,050. sq, ft.
restaurant building an 1.84 acres of land in the A -P
zone located or the west side of Archibald. Avenue
approximately 150 feet south of Devon Street - APN
208- 801 -39 & 40
i
"9
Planning Commission Agenda -3 June 10, 1981
i
I. ENVIRONMENTAL ,SSESSSHENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW; -%,O.
gT--Y/--7 -PRAVER - The development of a retaiISa�en
center on 1.9 acres of land in the C-,2 zone t "p Be
lbc-t26 100 feet easy. of Helms on the south side.of
Foothill - APM 208- 2261 -043 & 044
X. Council Referrals
XI. Director's Reports
J. 1317ABLISH HEARIIA SCHEDULE FOR INDUSTRIAL PLAN
K. SELECTION OF CHAIRMAN AND VICE- CHAIRMAN CORAL).
L. ETIWANDA SPECI'FI'C PLAN
M., Public Comments
This is the time and place for tae general public to
address the Commission. lie=s to be discussed here
are those which do not already appear on this agenda.
XI1i. Upcoming Agenda
Mr. Adjournment
The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative
Regulations that set an 11:00 P.m. adjournment time.
Tf items go beyond that time, they shall be hoard on_'y
with the consent of the Commi Sion.
0
CL
ti
0
J
W—
LL
N �
w
= W
YI
C
G
W
t�Q �
Z
n
m
b
n
b
0
c -
0 3AV AtlU3Ma
L 6J
LL �
N `t
a
Y.
1 1 aror ,•rWVmila
3Ad
pK
aFQ
F
�QQ
•. it .�
w
4
J
J
x
345
Y-w
d
T
H
w
a9�
O
�'�2.✓ rrl }i:
s
F
N
ti
0
J
W—
LL
N �
w
= W
YI
C
G
W
t�Q �
Z
n
m
b
n
b
0
c -
0 3AV AtlU3Ma
L 6J
LL �
N `t
a
Y.
1 1 aror ,•rWVmila
3Ad
pK
aFQ
F
�QQ
•. it .�
w
4
J
J
x
345
Y-w
d
T
H
w
a9�
O
u
s
F
N
Q
H
�w
P
6'
LV; !'
crry or RANCI-10 CLAWONIGA
S`�-q F REP T
7W
1977
DATE: June 10, 1981
TO: Members of the Planning Ccmmission
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 81 -20 -
GENERAL TELE ii NE OMPAN GTE - T e propose x,440 square
foot addition to existing telephone equipment building in
the R -1 zone located at 6322 East Avenue - ARM 225- 181 -•25
ABSTRACT: The applicant has requested review and approval for the
development of an addition to the existing telephone equipment building
as described above. The project has completed the Development and
Design Review process and is now before the Planning Commission to
receive environmental clearance_.
BACKGROUND: This review is for an environmental assessment to deter-
mine any significant adverse impacts on the environment as a result
of this project. The site and architer_tual design is not considered
at this time unless it is related to environmental concerns. To de-
termine significant adverse impacts, an Initial Study on environmental
concerns has been prepared. Upon comp'ietion of that study, evidence
would indicate either no significant impacts or the potential for
significant impacts. If a determination of no signitic:ant impacts
is nade based upon the Initial Study, then a Negative Declaration
may be issued for the project. If significant impacts are found,
then an Environmental Impact Report shall be r,quired to fully ana-
lyze the impacts of the project.
The detailed Site Plans and elevations will be reviewed and approved,
with conditions, by the City Planner contingent upon approval of
the Negative Declaration.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS. Part I of the Initial Study has been com-
pleted by the applicant and is attached for your review and consid-
eration. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Assessment
and found no significant adverse impacts on the environment as a result
of this project. It the Commission, concurs with such findings, then a
Negative Declaration would be in order.
ITEM A
EA
0
Environmental Assessment /Development RevIlew 81 -20
June 10, 1981
Page Two
RECOMMENDATION: based upon analysis of the Initial Study, it appears
that the project will not cause significant adverse impacts on the
environment. If the Commission concurs, then the issuance of a Negative
Declaration for the project would be in order.
Resgectful.ly submitted,
K.
BKN:DC:jr
Attachments: Part I
Exhibit
Exhibit
Exhibit
Exhibit
i
[nit
"Alt
SIBIO
l3C%l
D11
fat Study
- Location Map
- Site Plan
- Elevations
- Conceptual Grading Plan
E
11
0
11
CITY OF RANCHO CL'C:s:•IOSCA
INITIAL STUDY
ge
PART I - PROJECT I:.'t^OM- 1ATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant
Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $80.00
For all projects requiring environmental review, this
form must be completed and submitted to the Development
- n
Review Co-ittee through the department where the
prc,,,ect application is made. Upon receipt of thin
application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare
Part II of the Initial Study. T: a Development Review
Co =inittee will. meat and take action no later than lien
(10) days before the public meeting at vibich time the
project is to b.c, 'heard. The Cornittee will make one of
three dete=ainati -)ns: 1) The project will have no
envirormtental impact and a Negative Declaration will be
filed, 2) The project will have an envirorunental impact
and an Environmental I=-nact Report will be prepared, or
3) An additional infor-:ation report should be supz)lied
by the applicant giving further infor.*aation concerning
the proposed project. r
PROJECT TITLE: General Telephone - Etiwanda Exchange - Building Addition
APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TEL "EPHON E: General. Telephone Co. of
California 100 Wilshire Blvd. , Santa Monica CA 90401
213) 51 -/7
MME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED
CONCERNING THIS PROJECT 13 fond Calce77Fr:T.rR KTRVr.N PARRTSrr
ARCHITECTS, 444 S. Westmoreland Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90020 (213)384 -4106
LOCF.TION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS ARD ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.)
6322 East Av. Rancho Cucamonga CA
East 300 ft. of 225- 181 -25
LIST OTIIER PETU-sITS 1CCESSARM71 FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND
FEDERAL AGE. ;CIES AND THE AGEC:CY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS:
AT)sroval by Planni.ns� Dept. of Rancho Cucamonga and Dept. of Building and
SsJfet:v of Ran CIPI CIICam(1n S, :1.
1-
PROJFC: 5rFCRIPTIO_V
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: E_tistinc one story 'f�pe I telephone
2ipment building is being exspanded t:o the north --nd west to
additional telephone equipme nt. t e new construe con wl aia cn e
existing with the glazed brick ar -. - •xvered panels continued on the
east side facing Fa ^t Ave
ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND
PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANy- '`E FOOTAGE OF EXISTING ;aM
Existing Building Area 2 70$ S F. Area of site m 1.55 acres
New Building Adaition Arra 3,440 S.F.
DL'SCRIBE THE �-rAL c ^_Z"- Or TEn' PROJECT SITE
T..1CCL'JD.T,SG INFOR*-Y�TICY OT TOPOGP41PHIZ, PLANTS (T ?,EES) ,
ANIN'hLS, ANY CULTUIV -yL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE
OF SURROUATDINC PP.OPERTIr -S, A -D THE DESCRIPTIOiT OF AINTY
EXISTING STRUCTURES A%-M TH IR USE (1'zTTAC14 ti:= :CESStiRY SHEETS)
site is in a very
ain and 'rows of t
in their natural
cuy..y cesluentlal area with gently s 0p—i g
es dividing the land into modest sized fields
tate. East Ave. is a two lane curbless asphalt
tion that was widened when the original buiidin
to the south of the building site is a one sto
corral and open sheds in the rear or their property
eland is undeveloped i.nunediatel.y surrounding the
'Is the project, part of a larger proje -t, one of a series
Of cumulative actions, w:;ich although in'3ividually smal'_.
may as a whole have significant enviror-nent -1 iraact?
No
I° Z. 0
WIM, TA PPO..!7CT:
YES NO
X 1. Create a substantial. change in ground
contours?
X 2. Create a substantial change in existing
noise or vibration?
_ X _ 3. Create a substantial change in demand for
municipal services (police, fire, water,
sewage, etc.)'.
y X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or
general plan designations?
X S Remove -any existing trees? Hcw many?
X 6. create the need for use or disposal of
potentially bazardovs materials such as
toxic substances, flammables or explosives?
Explanation of any YES answers above:
TMTFJ!Z' ANT: If the project involves the construction of
residential units, complete the form on the
next page.
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished
above and in the attached exhibits present the data and
information required for this initial evaluation to the
best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and
information presented are true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief_ I further understand that
additional information may be required to be submitted
before an adequate evaulation can be made by Development
Review Cosznit-tee. . / l /)
Date may 8, 1981 Signature
H=R-_..
. RALPH SNYDER, JR
Title Assistant Seceetar
i GENERA: TELEPHONE COMPANY OF
CALIFORNIA
T-3
�,
[
,
��
r rY�'.'
,�
/,
;.'��
' •.� 1,
1 �Ir
�
1
1
1
Al
It
:,i•,
�;
.ifs.;'. �•fi J "r�r1
r,
,1r
1
u��1 IIf•
'r1', ., M1,• tl� .
I,
I
1
.y,J'•
I. •4,1
N�f1
Y
.'fir,
�
•
�: 1
1
.t .
'
yr'
!•
NORTH
1.
•. .,A
CITY
O
S'
•
RANCHO
C
.'
TITLE:
"r
/
l
�•/1�
yh
•
rt
'
\
t
� „I
'•
,�
• I1
�J�I I
,
I I 1�1�
II I I
1
I� �Y, I
�1� ._
y
•'
'
•r ='.'
r�.'.1
II
I
'I '1l
I II'�•
r'p'
•_
��
'
1 y.,
n r
�
-i
E
E
0
a�
FIR. 11 llN -/
I //
1 L�rL wp'.
1 Lwmr
x.
/Nsw AWITI9N
1
1
1
Gl1LL
�MKC
\
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMO GA
PLC *.NNING DWISION
ou
L*� ox H rtV
11
iTENI: 51
TITIJ': _ SI'"f RAW
EkHll T.- a _SCALE -. —* �_.
ryt�l�' �1 1 ci, n.. � Y. •
1 • � „ 1 '''�.�1� J. 1 �, ,.1� » 1. � •flirt, : , .
� �ebii'. Pa' �AjLCRFii047f�" Y" nR. •!DF�4'1'n�AlliiGittA#I.tu�:see ..R tl1n���.n....�...-
LL �,
L,1
\' ri
E
I ypY' i
~,' j
FE
._ .........
" T IiT I T I T
It
v mo=w Limp.
CDLLLI. 1 eTLT I ; I ��L.1
aM1 �_�, MiGlO qV0 M191NC J S I 1
ww� � sy.•u bLVLWY
4 WtlwnlD AvC�
L� V
NORTH
CITE' OF ITGN It ___ �-9� ° -co
f� �'C,���� C�T �I�:�'GA TITLE C- r L). & l . � 4*
,, -� PLANNC \G DINILSION 1_.. \itlI31T: SCALE.._ "'"
t.
�.•1
l_
CITY OP RANCHO C ' MO`:C;A
STAY r, REP RT
DATE: June 10, 1981
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Capital Improvements Program 1981 -82
ri
Attached for Planning Commission review and approval is t;ie 1981 -82 Capital
Improvements budget and a revised Long Range Capital Improvements Study.
The current Capital Plan is basically a continuation of last year's program
into the current year. One exception is the proposed Base Line Widening
which will be constructed as a cooperative project with the, condominium develop-
ment on the northwest corner of Base Line and Hermosa.
Also attached for your information is a copy of the road needs analysis recent-
ly submitted to the City Council and an analysis memo on current legislation .
being heard in the State Legislature. I will review at the meeting the long
range needs with the Commission but will not be seeking approval of the proposed
priority listings at this time. Ii the Commission wishes, Engineering would
reschedule a more detailed analysis of the Capital Improvement needs for the
future.
RECOMMENDATION
It is requested that the Commission adopt the attached resolution finding the
proposed Capital Improvements P;-,)gram for 1981 -82 consistent with the General
Plan and recommending approval to the City Council.
Respectfully submitted,
LBH: jaa
Attachments
ITEM
B
e
RESOLUTION! NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHn CUCAMO;IGA PLANNING COt t•IISSION
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF 1981 -82 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
PROGRAM AND FINDING OF CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN.
Planning Commissionoheldea 27th
eeting tc Cucamonga
Capital improvements Program; and Proposed
WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission concurs
in the recommended program as proposed; and
WHEREAS, the proposed program conforms to the Elements
of the General Plan
NOV, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Commission hereby:
SECTION 1: Find that the attached Capital Improvement Program
is in conformance with the General Plan of Rancho Cucamonga.
SECTION 2: Recommends approval of the attached
Capital Improvements Program for the 1981 -82 fiscal proposed
Council of Rancho Cucamonga for its adoption, Year to the City
APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THIS day of 1981.
PLANNING CO;'IMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA
BY:
Ri6iard Dahl , Chairman'
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Planning C000nission
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meeting of the Planning
COm0lissi0r, held on the 27th day of !•ta+�,
to wi t: 1431, by the following vote,
AYES: C0.'•C'.i5SIONERS:
NOES: CCFit1ISS[OtlERS:
ASSENT: C01'MISSIONERS:
CA
Total $1,538,249
0 a
PROPOSED 1981 -82
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRMI
AIL
REVENUE SUI%2 ARY
Gas Tax (2106, 2107)
$232,458
SB 325
$305,101
Systems Development Funds
$420,000
Federal Aid Urban Funds (Restricted)
$340,000
Federal Grade Crossing Funds ( Restricted)
$ 76,725
Community Block Grant Funds (Restricted)
$163,965
Total Revenue
$1,538,249
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
1.
Vineyard. Avenue Widening & Signals
Eighth Street to Arrow Route (FAU)
$480,000
2.
Phase 2 North Town Street Improvements
r
(CUBG) Reid, Feron and Main Streets
$163,965
3.
Deer Creek Bridges
$258,241
4.
Carnelian Street Realignment
$400,000
5.
Sapphire Street Reconstruction.
$ 21,000
6.
Archibald Reconstruction at Banyan and Highland
$ 30,000
7.
Demens Equestrian. Bridge
$ 15,000
8.
P.ase Line Widening (cooperative project with
Developer) Hermosa East
$140,000
9.
t.ssessment District 79 -1 Design
$ 30,043
Total $1,538,249
STORM DRAIN FUNDS
ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE
PROJECT SUMMARY
1. Design Assessment District 79 -1
(Loan 1 year)
2. Design Beryl - Redhill Storm Drain
?. Misc. Design and Planning Studies
4. Misc. Construction Drainage Facilities
Sapphire @ Banyan - Extend Catch Basins
4th Street @ Archibald - Add Catch Basin
Beryl @ 19th Street - Add Catch Basin
and nuisance drain
Total
$601,364
$40,000
$ 501000
$ 50,000
$100,364
$601,365
El
13
!1! .9
CITY OF RANCI -10 1,110`:G,.
smu 1A REP P IiT
DATE: May 20; 1981
TO:
City
Council and
City
Manager
FL_'d:
Lloyd
B_ Hubbs,
City
Engineer
SUBJECT: Status of Streets and Highway Needed
Attached for Council review is the Proposed 1981 -82 Capital Improve
ment Program and the Long Range Capital Program. The proposed bud-
get for next year deals primarily with a continuation of previously
initiated projects and restricted federally funded projects. The
B,-,,;e Line Widening is proposed in anticipation of a cooperative
project with the condominium development on the northwest corner
of Base Line and He rnosa. if it appears that this project does
not proceed within the year these funds could be diverted. The
Long Range Capital needs have been completely re- established this
year to insure a fresh evaluation of needs. This inventory has been
segregated into four categories.
Major Projects
° Arterial Resurfacing and Reconstruction
° Special Projects
° Traffic Signals
All of these projects exclusive of grade separations and interch
wort: are now needs that should be accomplished as quickly as pos
The total needs are estimated at:approximately $7,500,000.
Of this amount, the most sensitive areas for consideration are the
arterial and local street resurfacing and reconstruction. These
projects total approximately $2,000.000.00. All. of these projects
are currently required and many have been deferred already for seve
years. No funds are available this yt-4r to accomplish any of this
work. As the Council is aware, the continued deferral of this
maintenance will double and triple the cost of repairs and result
in increased demand for routine surface patching from our maintena
crews.
e
Assuming a 20 year reconstruction life on the current 220 mile sys-
tem, the normal road maintenance budget should approach $1.3 million.
Road maintenance is funded primarily through gas tax revenues and
sales tax on gasoline. Gax ta:: is currently a set 7 cents per aallon
Status of Streets and
May 20, 1981
Page 2
Highways Needed
and has been at that level. since 1963. In recent years, with
increased fuel efficiency of the auto fleet, and the effects of
construction inflation have resulted in dramatic decreases in
the funds available for street maintenance and improvement. The
attached table demonstrates these impacts.
The total street budget available this year is broken down as
follows:
° Gax Tax $424,193
° SB 325 Sales Tax $556,804
TDA
° Systems Development $420,000
Total funds available are $1,400,997
The primary claim on these funds are the routine maintenance and
administration which totals $525,716. The remaining $875,281 is
assignable to projects.
It should be pointed out that the City's routine maintenance service
levels are at a minimum acceptable level. of service and are signifi-
cantly below comparable Cities in tree trimming and street sweeping.
Also, the Council should be aware that the estimated $420,000 in
Systems Funds depends on a level of growth which substantially increases
the current traffic hazards and management problems. If the growth
levels are not normal, these funds could significantly decrease.
From these figures it can be seen that the City is operating at a
normal deficiency of $400,000 with addressing increased maintenance
due to growth or accomplishing any major capital improvements.
In summary, without a significant increase in revenues available for
road maintenance and improvements, this City and all road departments
throughout the State are facing a total deterioration of our streets
and highways with the next 20 years.
Rancho Cucamonga in all of this, is somewhat more fortunate than other
Cities. Our Citv road system, because of recent growth, is relatively
new and maintenance, tlierefore, somewhat lower than older Cities. Also,
with our strong growth pattern, we are able to supplement traditional
sources of funds through fee supports. No growth older Cities have
neither of these advantages. lie will, however, lose this advantage
each year as the responsibilities of development replace the opportunities
and the City ages and becomes more stable.
C
C
M.,
oLCLU-' U! �-creets anu Highways Deeded
May 20, 1981
Page 3
RECOMMEDID`,T IONS
The road problems outlined in this memo place before the City three
challenges:
1. To fully consider road needs in the balance of municipal servi -es
to provide the safest most coat effective system 'possible.
2. To consider fully the ongoing responsibilities of growth to the
fiscal stability of the City and try to balance those responsibili.-
ties with the opportunities.
3. To assist other agencies and policy boards in developing funds
to equitably provide for the maintenance of our streets and
highways.
It is the third challenge that is currently being addressed by the
Foran Bill (SB215), which was summarized in my April 1, 1981 memo
to Council. This Bill which recently passed the Senate will add an
insufficient but badly needed two cents to the gax tax along with
other financial supplements. These changes would begin in 1983 and
are broadly recognized to be only a holding action to arrest the
deterioration of inflation. Further increases are needed now and
will be needed in the future.
To lend the City' full support to these efforts, it is recommended
that the attached resolution be executed and transmitted to legislators.
but beyond that the Council as individuals need to commit to educating
the community to this problem to garner a broad based support to main-
tain our transportation system. No action is required on the Capital
Improvg6ents Program prior to approval by the Planning Commission.
Respectfully submitted,
a�
I13T_-i:jaa
Attachments
P420RITY
1.
2.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15,
t,
GONG
ENGMEERING DIVISIOI
RA.N;GE CAPITAL
IZ'IPRCVW, TS
PROJECT PI:IORITIE:S
MAJOR PROJECT PRIORITY
STREET
T,TMTm; /nrSCRIPTIC -,q
= '-_ =-- _______
c
ESTIMATED OST
Vine'-lard Avenue
Eight St. tc^ Arrow Rte. (FAU)
$420x000
Widening and Signals
Carnelian Street Vineyard to Church
Realign Curves
$400,0()o
Base Tine Road
East and West of Hermosa
$140,000
Widening and Reconstruction
Hellman Avenue
@ Foothill Blvd.
Widening, Drainage and
$350,000
Signals
Grove Avenue
Eighth to Foothill
Widening, Signal Modifications
f
$762.500
Hellman Avenue
Base Line to SPRR
Widening and Drainage
$327,200
I. =-son Avenue
@ Alta Loma Channel
$
Culvert Crossing
30,x000
Turner Avenue
@ Foothil). Bled.
$3GO,r
Signals, Widening, Drainage
Iler rosa Avenue
@ SPRrZ
Widening and Drainage
$350,000
Hellman Avenue
@ AT &SF RR
Widening and Drainage
$350,000
Turner Avenue
@ AT&SF RR
Widening and Drainage
$330,000
Ramona Avenue
@ SPRR
Widening and Drainage
$35C,000
IIellman Avenue
San Bernardino Rd. to Church St.
$ 35,800
Widening
Archibald Avenue
19th St. to Highland Ave.
$ 85,000
Reali,nment and 1idening
Berfl Aven,-,c
L,.mon to 500 `t. North
$ 30,UOG
Widcni r. � any' ) ?econstruction
r PR102I
16.
17.
18
2
STP.i T
Arrow Route
Ch ,urch Street
Base Line Road
91
LIMITS /!3TSCP -2TION
Archib,A,J to Haven
Widenin'.
Center to Haven
Widening
Alta Cuesta to
West City Limits
ES'T'I`^.hr -rl— CC)--.
$ 82,00c
$ 73,200
$ 34.9nb
$?,559,600
ENGINEERING DIi/ISIO'4
L RANGE C?!PITAL IMPROVEME PROGRR ,
A RIAL RESURFACING A140 RECC949TRUCTIO11
PRIORITIES
PRIORITY
—
r
STREET
LI "•1IT5 � o
/DESCRIPTION EST7`•I�kTE
1•
Carnelian Street
Hi ghland to Dan-van
�—
Resurfacing
$1501000
2•
Archibald Avenue
Minor Reconstruction
S/O Highland Avenue
,.
30,000
S/O Banyan
3-
S=apphire Street
Thoroughbred to Jannet
Reconstruction
$ 21,000
4 •
Her.„osa Avenue
c
�/O Nineteenth Street to Victoriz
Resurfacing
,° 26,000
5-
Archibald Avenue
Fourth to Nineteenth Street
Resurfac ng (Phased)
$400,kl00
6-
Victoria Avenue
Pecan to Etiwanda
Resurfacing
$ 20,000
7'
Lemon %venue
Her -mosa to Cartilla
Resurfacing
$ 16,500
$-
Base Line Road
I - -15 to Etiwanda
W
Widening and Resurfacing
$ 22'�
9-
Hillside Road
Amethyst to Beryl
Resurfacing
$ 40,000
10.
Hillside Road
Rancho Wash to Carnelian
Resurfacing
$ 20,000
11-
Beryl Avenue
Manzanita to Hillside
Resurfacing
$ 50,000
12.
rermosa Avenue
S/O Victoria St.
Resurfacing
(see 1..'•4)
13.
Hellman Avenue
Church Street to Base Line
Resurfacing
$ 32,000
14•
Church Street
P.rchibald to He1'.raan
Resurfacing
$ 32,000
15•
Carnelian Strect
Banyan to Demons Channel
$ 31,000
Resurfacing
E
r '�ICi�ITY
STREET
LIMITS/DESCRIPTION
---
LISTIiWr- -D COS, .
15.
East Avenue
Nineteenth Street to Soruit
$ 46,500
Resurfacing
17.
Etiwanda Avenue
Foothill to 23rd Street
150,000
Resurfacing
g (Phao .,ed)
13-
Amethyst Street
Various N/O Nineteenth Street
(see n „25)
•
Resurfacing
19.
Ninth Street
Vineyard to Grove
Resurfacing
$ 36,8U0
20.
Fellman Avenue
Cucamonga Creek to Arrow
$ 1,000
Resurfacing and Reconstruction
21.
Turner Avenue
Fourth Street to 26th Street
$ 38,500
Resurfacing
22.
Vineyard Avenue
Carnelian _
an to Bas:
$ 27,000
Resurfacing
23.
Street
8th Street to 9th Street
$ 20,500
Resurfacing
2'. -•
Beryl Avenue
Base Line to Banyan
Resurfacing
$ 49,500
25.
Arethyst Avenue
Base Line to Highland
$ 40,000
Resurfacing
26.
Hillside Road
Archibald to Fiaven
$ 35,000
Resurfacing
27•
Base Line P.oad
Haven to Etiwanda
$ 77;500
28.
Arrow Route
Vineyard to Baker
$ 40,000
29.
Banyan Street
Beryl to Carnelian
$ 6,000
30.
Highland Avenue
Archibald to Hermosa
$ 10,000
31.
San Bernardino Rd
Archibald to Hellman
$ 35,000
32•
Fourth Street (D1 /S)Cucamonga
Creek. to Hellman
$135,000
$1,6G3,800
s
ENGINEERING DIVTg70
(RANGE CAPITAL
I
h1PROVE'NE PP.CGR
.1
i
SPECIAL PROJECTS
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
iSTIi•?A ED Co_,
Guard Rail Reol.acement
Turner @ Church
$ 4,800
Hellman @ Foothill
6,900
Hellman @ 8th Street
$ 27,000
Turner @ 8th Street
$ 6,900
Turner @ Foothill.
$ 20,1.00
Haven Avenue, Deer Creek to Highland Avenue
$
345,000
Allen Reconstruction
S/0 Foothill - Archibald to Klusmaa
$ 37,000
N10 Foothill - E/0 Archibald ` Court House
$ 7,600
N10 Base Line IJ /O City Offices
a` 18,Op0
S/n Foothill W/O and parallel to Archibald
$ 4,200
ti/O Arro';- Hellman. to Carnelian
`
E/O Pschibald S/O & Parallel to Foc;hill Blvd.
$ 48,600
Milliken Avenue Grade Separation at
Santa Fe Railroad (R /I4 Protection)
$5,104,000
Haven Avenue Grade Separation at
Santa Fe Railroad (R /Iti Protection;
$3,176.000
Seventh Street Interchange with-1-15
Include (R/jq Protection)
No Cost
Foothill. Interchange with 1, -15
(RAPT Protection)
No Cost
Demons Channel Equestrian Bridge at
Jasper Street
$ 15,000
Deer Cree'; Lridgc Betterments
$258,241
Local. Street P.r• ^,i.tr�.�ri� /,eal C,:ts
(see
attar ^ed map) (current bac %iog)
$35U,000
;
Future, Local. SLreeL- Rcrurfaciac /Seal Coat;
$100,000
I
�I
.I
qp
RcCON•fidEKDED
TRAFFIC SIONAL PRICRITY
I 1TERS ECTION
Carnelian and Lemon
Archiba'-Ld and Fourth
3 Modify Grove and Arrow
4 Archibald and Sixth Street
5
:z
7
8
9
10
�I
11
12
13
1,
15
16
Carnelian and San Bernardino Rd
Archibald and 19th Street
STATUS
To be completed
by develoaer.
Under study by
C:aLTP. ANTS
Pas- Line and Beryl Street
�' -edify Grove and San Bernardino Rd
.i0dify Grove and Ninth Street
Vineyard and Ninth Street
i:'th Street and Beryl Street
19th Street and .vurcthvst
19th Street: and Hellman Avenue
SaP?hire and 19th Street
Fcothill and Red Hill CounLY Club Dr
Archibald and Nint;t Street
ESTIMATED
COST
$60,000
50,000
60,000
80,000
60,000
60,000
50,000
60,000
60,00C
60,000
50,000
0,000
50,000
50,000
60,000
50,000
TOTAL $910,000
Hellman and Foothill - high priority if SS•:C and SEC develo ^r.,ents
to go 9.n. rIovG to v2.
a �
RECC_.L .$;IDZD
r_ r�jalT,,
1
2
qp
RcCON•fidEKDED
TRAFFIC SIONAL PRICRITY
I 1TERS ECTION
Carnelian and Lemon
Archiba'-Ld and Fourth
3 Modify Grove and Arrow
4 Archibald and Sixth Street
5
:z
7
8
9
10
�I
11
12
13
1,
15
16
Carnelian and San Bernardino Rd
Archibald and 19th Street
STATUS
To be completed
by develoaer.
Under study by
C:aLTP. ANTS
Pas- Line and Beryl Street
�' -edify Grove and San Bernardino Rd
.i0dify Grove and Ninth Street
Vineyard and Ninth Street
i:'th Street and Beryl Street
19th Street and .vurcthvst
19th Street: and Hellman Avenue
SaP?hire and 19th Street
Fcothill and Red Hill CounLY Club Dr
Archibald and Nint;t Street
ESTIMATED
COST
$60,000
50,000
60,000
80,000
60,000
60,000
50,000
60,000
60,00C
60,000
50,000
0,000
50,000
50,000
60,000
50,000
TOTAL $910,000
Hellman and Foothill - high priority if SS•:C and SEC develo ^r.,ents
to go 9.n. rIovG to v2.
a �
CITY Of l2ANC1 i0 A' ON ;(' A
M ENJORAIN UI.,r
DATE: April l-, 1981
TC= City Council and City Manager
FRO.]: Lloyd B. Hubbs, Cit•� Engineer
gineer
SUBJECT: Transportation Financing
2 recently had the opportunity to attend the League of Public Works
Officers CL-nference in Sacramento. The major topic of this confer-
ence was the tremendous lack of funding to maintain and develop the
State Highway, Roads and Streets system. As I'M sure the Council
aware that we are currently on the verge of losing the finest h -gh-
way systems in the world and along with it the Primary capital asset
of the State and its Cities and Counties. The League thrcuah its
Public Works Division has determined that the time has cone to make
the public aware of what- it is cbout to loses an' to develop support
in the Legislature for a program to s,-,-- investor
f`nt
The League is sponsoring a bill authored by Se_a.tor John Fcran. This
bill is SB215 and is summarized in the attached material. The bill
basically raises license and user fees, protects all gasoli
per gallon. ne sale
taxes for transportation uses and raises the gas tax by two (2; cenf_�
The erosion of gar tax funds have been dramatically demonstrated in
a report prepared by the California Transportation Commission which
shows the dramatic loss of value of transportation funding. Most
Cities have been forced to completely delete roadway
and have begun const- uction
g to defer maintenance for extended PerNods_ Most
major maintenance programs vary from 10 to 25 years, depending upon
traffic volumes, severity of climdte. Because of reve1;ue shortages,
the scheduled .cycles have been extended repeatedly, t17itil they have
become meaningless. The City of Oakland's resurfacing progiain pre-
sently budgeted 5 miles per year of total maintained mile of 778.
The impact of maintenance deferal is a false economy Which if not
stopped will result in a near total failure of tha system and immense
reconstruction cost. The CTC report points out that I.
between resurfacing a The difference
20 years of service is after. 5 years of service compared to after
constant approxiinatclY a four -fold increase, asst:ming
dollar".
"The cost of properly maintaining, a roadway is estimated to be one
q aster the cost of rehabilitating a road that has been allowed to
deteriorate and one -tenth the cost of comoletcly rebuilding it ".
Page 2
I
Because the residential street mileage within Rancho Cucamonga is
so new only 20% of our 220 mile system is beginning to require
rehabilitation. The major street system requires extensive and in
some cases, constant attention. Engineering is currently quantify-
ing these needo and will be presenting these needs to the Council
as a part of the lbudget process. At that time, it is hoped that the
Council will strongly support the Foran Bill and will carefully con-
s =der street needs within tb= City.
The Foran Bill is only a holding action which will arrest the d;ateri-
Oration. To deal effectively v?-4,,.h the problem will require much
stronger ac -lion and further tax increases. "'he Council has the
opportunity to take a lead in saving our rccl system.
Pespectfully submitted,
C.
LBH:jaa
Attachments
CC: Jack Lam
Paul Rougeau
Monte Prescher
Dave Leonard
Barry Hogan
March 12, 1981
SENATE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE
<70 =n Francis Foran, Chairman
ANAI•YSIS - S.L. No. 215
As Amended Fecrua (Fora-)
ry 13, 1981—)
Subjects Transportation financing.
DESCRIPTION
S
This bill would increase various Motor
Vc,hicle Account fees
B
and the gallonage tax on
gasoline and diesel uel. The bulk
of these
increases would be phased in
over a three -year
Period, beginning- in 1982.
5
The bill also would
shift gradual3.y revenues generated by the
tax
sales
on gasoline from the General Fund to the
State Highway Account
P
and local transportation
funds.
I
N
The key areas and features of the bill
A
• are:
N
'1r_,'_0r Vehicle Account
C
E
e Vehicle registration fees would be increased Y
from the present $11 to $19 in 1982, $21 in E
1983 and $22 in 1984. Fees for the transfer S
Of registration and duplicate registrations
would increase from $3 to $7 upon passa
of the bill. ge
o Driver's license fees would increase from the
present $3.25 to $8 in 1982, $10 in 1983 and
$12 in 1984. Identification cards would
increase from $3 to $6, except for senior
citi<.ens who would continue to pay $3.
c Commercial truck weight fees would increase by
a cumulative total of 40 percent in 1982, SO
Per!ent in 198-1 and 60 percent in 1984. The
bill would require that all weight- fee revenues,
less the costs of collections, be deposited in
the Sate Rich' -lay Account rather than the Motor
Vehicle Account.
more..........
i
CI
S3 215 (reran) —�-
March 12, 19E1
Fees for trip permits and the registration of
out -of -state vehicles also would
$5 be
and $6, respectively, to $10, raised from
nouSecretary of the Business, Transportation and
�ousiMg Agency would be required to sui. -,it a
report to the Legislature by January 10, 1985
on the adequacy of fees charged for support o°
state orerati.ons funded from the b ?otor -T i
:�cceunt. Fo1- �wup reports would be eh —c -e
on a periodic "- recuired
oasis.
Fuel Taxes
The exi.stir. 7
5 teas - der- aailon tzr. on ^o-or
Vehicle fuel would be increased b 2 tents
gzilon, ber;rning i. 1 Y c-.._:, per
In 19Aa. One --ent o� t:.e
i.acraasp would be retained by the
the other cent would be allocated toacitir�sle
and counties,
the federal fuel tax of 4 �.
was reduced, cents per gallon
t:�e sate fuel tax would be
lncr.eased by the same amount so that the
comi:ined federal and state fuel tax rate
equals 13 cents per gallon.
• An additional, one -time, allocation of $100
cities in. fuel tax revenues would be m, e to
cities and counties during 1982 -83 for streets
and roads purposes.
ev Cities and counties for the first time would
share in diesel fuel tax revenues.
p Counties would l,e pertittcd to impose an
additional ruei tax, in cne -cent increments,
if 1, voters approve the incrzase, and 2) the
revenues are used for the transportation,
purposes specified in Article \2:! of the
California Constitution.
more..........
AN
SB 215 (in) -3_ ch 12, 1981
° Counties would be required to contract with
the State Board of Equalization for administra-
tion of.any county fuel tax and Payment of the
costs of administration.
s Seventy percent of the State Highway Account
funds used for new construction would be
allocated to counties on t-e basis of each
county's contribut:iou to the account. The
remaining 30 percent woull be allocated by
the California Transportation Cmmmission on a
statewide needs basis.
° The authority of the California Transportation
Commission to pay the cost_ of toll bridge
maintenance from toll bridge revenues would
be deleted. Payment of these maintenance
expenses would be made from the State Highway
Account, as provided in current law.
Sales Tax on Fuel
° "Spillover" revenues from the sales tax on
motor vehicle fuel which currently are
retained in the General Fund, gradually would
be shifted to transportation' uses. The bill
would cap the General Fund fue l
at $150 million in 1981 -82 and reduce this
amount by $30 million annually ($120 million
in 1582 -83, $90 million in 1983 -84, etc.)
One -half of the sales tat revenues shifted from
the General Fund would be transferred to the
State Highway Account and one -half would be
allocated to local agencies for streets and
highway and transit purposes.
_. �,iangcs (In millions)
1981 1982 1983 1984 1985
State ev.;nuc Increase 1982 1933 1984 1985 1986
t,Otor vehicle Account
State Iiighway Account
Rt : °� - °- Izcreace
TOTAL o r
I
t
Transfer from G,ar:eral
Fund
I
! To State
----- TO -Local -Agencies -
$112 $103
29 205
$ 0 $ ioo
$1-.1 $408
-36 -11°
$146
313
$163
$527
-190
$ 18 $ 59 $
18 59
$165 $169
331 337
$172 $176
$'068 $632
-223 -255
95 $11-q $1�9
95 114 129
--------- - - ---'
In
17 ^F-3� rl 7? �-r,
( L- a.iS. -� Lij•� va` gu-ve, •SAN �dO.ebYY'+�. nia C,i " Ba~
a�7+...v
C y.
wwv lnGf44f•,
JOINT STATEIkIENT BY THE COUNTY SUPERVISORS ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA
AND THE LEAGUE. OF CALIFORNIA CITIES REGARDING THE TRANSPORTATION
FUNDING CRISIS AT THE CITY. AND COUNTY LEVEL IN CALIFORNIA.
The Co; :Llty Supervisors Association of California (CSAC) and the League of California
Cities MCC) rc:c.�gnize the need to increase local road and street financing. The two
o-;anizaticns jolit in a cooperative effort to ensure that this serious crisis is addressed by
the Leis :azure. The facts can no longer be ignored without serious fiscal and proms
Corse .u;:nces. program
As a cedescrian, cyclist, transit patron or driver, we are dependent upon a system of
city streets county }roads and state highways. As consumers, the cost we pay for the
delivery of goods and services is also directly related to this same system of roadways.
The lorJer the service level this system provides. the higher the user costs. Directly
related user costs aiiected by this lower service include vehicle repairs, maintenance and
dcprer_iation, fuel corsumption and insurance premiums. Often overlooked related costs
include delays, exposure to hazards and the cost for the delivery of goods and services.
The condition of the roadwsy system in the State of California in serious jeopardy due
to a lack of funding. The Census Bureau has reported that California ranks the lowest of
all states in per capita expenditure for highways. Reduced governmental expenditures for
hiohways'are neither ;ost :effective nor economical if the result is higher total costs to
the cr „su :ner. Adequate road and street rraintennnce and timely safety improvements
need to ade'goate funding base. Such expenditures can substantially reduce other user
cos *s.
California is experie•lcing a rapid decline in transportation capital investment, safety
irnprov^ments and just plain maiiiicnancc. There has been recent prr_ss coverage of the
state hi hwav system revenue shot tfnll: The disastrous impact on COU•tty roads and city
streets has not yet received the same coverage as the state highway needs; }et, the bull:
Of the transportation system is in loco] facilities, and the local needs are accelerating ns
the reve: t decressc. Not all cities and counties have identical problems due to
dif trenc s rarginm front r-ge of existill- facilities, expansion and development potential,
shift:;., - opulation patterns: terrain an:.i seasonal differences, etc.; but, all local agencies
Ct eJ;k,2riencirlo tt-� effects of inflation arid rising
effects include reduced maintenance capability, inrreasl.dltort liability exposures insbility
to rc: :pond to safety instillations, and inability to maintain viable improvement promr:uns.
\ As ea sting systerns deteriorate the cost to cure the result;n; prcblems dr:tstically
rmCCCU;. i.j U ilC ' Oft”) USCr is t it onn
oIlar of ti;cly Or1C
Icn ml-linter.ence now will s,lve Utt!on
U., VIP..] 1r0;:1 nu•v. 1t0UO 21:10 Sheet n:0111tenanco find
pr.:ceni e ^ ?itai ii.; rev;: -
P �.a�.a� C o,, louars. u1e cost of hi .-h•:ray maintenance and
construction has in
The value of the Pr Wt 7c t `he average rate of 18%
on inal 7e gas tax is approxirnatel Pnnum for the last five
g rate authorized in 19u3. The y 1�3 of the )ears'
iAttachment). purchasing Purchasing power of the
P continu,2; to erode each year
Recent testimony by local agencies before the Transportation Committees
Legislature illustrate the dramatic impacts of r
County it has 5cen riecessar the current revenue shortfall. In or the because the existing Y to scarify existing paved roads back tog g
Oakland's paving could not be mainto' brave' sta,_tws
Preventive maintenance resurfacing Program
5 07 years while it e recognized that a maximum in a safe condition. The City of
length of 2 , pro °ram is rapidly extreme range of a. cost effective is r P e a cycle l approaching a cycle
maximum of a 30 -year cycle length is the
curtailed reeog Program. Many cities and counties have drastically
maintenance °n12ed maintenance programs involving
maintenance and street cleaning, and are struggling
minor street paving, traffic sign
would take a Pro °ram' Caltrnns, private bblirg to maintain a minirnum
at least an and local !overnment stnA;ae a:__. hard
ado.ttonar r^-�_L ..
.11 ,very serve - -- -..., v„e,nents and - ..,,cn,.,v
pavements for automobile traffietrtranortation needs geOntrnurag maintenance
includir. safe and serviceable
that enhances air quality n transit vehicle use, goods delivery in an environment
5 nd provides for saving of energy, cannot be provided without a
reasonable revenue base,
million Der year to A The same studies indicate that it Lvor, ?rt rnL
sr•n�.,..,_ r_tura Pil r.�...... -- -
ancrs
Other factors have also contributed to the de Y
systems. These include tP a following:
terioration of cif and county highway 1. Aza
The local system of streets and roads - g g
still reduce the need for major repairs and reconstructionDue to
existing system this Timely maintenance can
car, no longer be deferred without accelerated deterioration.
2. Truck_ Weights the age of the
The maximum truck weights were
indicate that heavi increased in 1974. . Numerous studies clearly
er vehicles have a definite impact and aceelera!
Of roadways. At the local level these conditions have
al eady serious funding a deterioration
o crisis as most small trips begin and end on loci exacerbated the
3. Ircr�asIn :Mobility Trends and Im roved Fuel Er_onornv
Willie total fuel consumption has modest'
dramatically increased. The result is more decreased L'ehicle fuel efficiency has
accelerated tae deteric �ti°n and increased the the roadways
improvements- need for safet • which has
3 and operational
Local agencies have
transportation needs• historically supplemented hig user fees to Provide
of local government to roposition 13 �,. htvay u
continue and I,oposition 4 have severely cur iled he required
stru;gle to allocate diminishing to all °cafe general funds to transportation
tax and oth,:r resources tr needs ICr feel proposals needs in the
o�ert:he! ntirtm,. needs hould be strongrl�cztscd support of transportntioalneccase the g;1s
al ag
SUeil be supported. needs inclJdtttg
trans. nor: state reve The evidence of the needs is
?ort.n.tion s,stcrn can be t111e is the 1_.
county roads and city streets. m•untalned at all leveh in1 C; California-stah� t a viable
0. highv:NyS.
)e
E]
E
!i;,; .
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCFIO CIIONGA
ST.AJ-4T RE PORT
June 10, 1981
Members of the Planning Commission
Barry K. Hogan, City Planner
Michael Vairin, Senior Planner
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE FLKMII
N0. $1-05 - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY - The
development of an electrical distribution substation
on 4.78 acres of land in the R -1 -20 zone located on
the northwest corner of Archibald and Wilson Avenues -
APN 1061 - 571 -04
BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission, at its meeting of May 13, 1981,
continued the public hearing on this matter to this date to allow
representatives of the Edison Company to meet with homeowners in
the vicinity of the project to work out concerns voiced by the
citizens. The representatives. from Edison have met with Staff to
review some of the concerns that were raised by citizens to the
Staff. However, Edison was unable to arranqe a meeting prior to
the compilation of this report and is therefore asking contin-
uance of the hearing to June.24, 1981. Attached is a letter from
Edison requesting the continuance and a letter which Edison sent
to surrounding property owners for the meeting.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planninq Commission
continue the public hearing to June 24, 1981.
d,
Attachments: Letter from Southern California Edison
Letter to Property Owners
ITE14 C
1977
R. Vt. BOND
AREA MANAOQR
Southern California Edison Company
UPLAND. CALIFORNIA 91766
June 1, 1.981
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P. U. Sox 837
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Attention: Mr. Michael Vairin, Planning Department
Gentlemen:
SUBJECT: C.U.P. No. 81 -05 - Southern California Edison
Attached is a copy of a letter sent to all residents
in the vicinity of our proposed Alta Loma Substation
at Wilson and Archibald Avenue who have expressed
concern with the project.
As you suggested, we are requesting that action by
the Planning Commission be postponed until the June 24
meeting to allow more time to resolve the concerns
of homeowners in the neighborhood.
Please call me at 947 -2996 if you have other complaints
or suggestions relative to C.U.P. No. 81 -05.
RWB:mb
Attachment
Si:a;erely,
R. W. �$�jnd
=a
TCLCVNONE
(714) 947.2996
1]
0
Southern California Edison Company
422 NORTH LCCOND'AVC.
UPLAND. CALIPONNIA 91100
R. W. BOND June 1, 1981
AREA MAN -OCR
Mr. and Mrs. Glenn Shaw
5625 Klusman Avenue
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Shaw:
As you know,. Southern California Edison Company has
requested a Conditional Use Permit to build an elec-
trical distribution substation on 2.42 acres of a
five -acre parcel located on the northwest corner of
Archibald Avenue and Wilson Street in Alta Loma.
Since severe.l residents in the vicinity of the prorosed
project have expressed concern with the visual appearance
of a substation, I have arranged for a meeting tc, be
held at 7:30 p.m. June 9 (Tuesday) at the Lions Park
Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga. I have
also informed the City Planning Department of the
homeowners meeting and requested that action be post-
poned on our request to the Planning Commission at
the June 10 meeting.
Your expressions of concern are appreciated. Hopefully,
we can disc-ass them with you on June and arrive at
a mutually acceptable improvement planned for your
neighborhood. I look forward to meeting you.
Sincerely,
R. W. Blind
RWB:mb
CC: City of Rancho Cucamonga
91
T(I,CPMGMC
(71.) Cu44N4
11
E
CITY OF RANCl -10 CL;CC TONGA
STAFF POW
DATE: June 10, 1981 u L
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner
BY: Otto Kroutil, Associate Planner
SUB-:ECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11696
VANGUARD - A custom lot subdivision of 2.0 acres of
land into 6 single family residential lots in the R -1-
rf,500 zope, located west of Sapphire Street at the
western terminus of Garden Court - APN 201- 201 -33
V, l
ABSTRACT: The applicant is requesting approval of a custom lot sub-
division of 6 lots in the R -1 -8,500 zone. Since the proposed sub-
division meets all applicable requirements, and appears to be a
logical extension of existing development, the Staff is recommending
approval with appropriate conditions.
BACKGROUND: The application entails a request for the approval of a
Tentative Tract Map for a custom lot subdivision of 6 lots on 2.0
acres in the R -1 -8,500 zone. The proposed subdivision is located
west of Sapphire Street at the western terminus of Garden Court, just
south of the future Route 30 right -of -way (Exhibit "A "). The project
site is currently vacant and is not in use at this time. Numerous
piles of loose dirt and debris have been dumped in the northerly
portion of the property. The site has a slope of about 4% to the
southeast. Several mature trees are located on the property on its
northern portion.
The proposal has been submitted as a custom lot subdivision and has
been reviewed in accordance with the Growth Management Ordinance.
The Tentative Map, (Exhibit "B "), received a point rating in excess
of the required threshold, and is therefore eligible for consider-
ation and approval by the Planning Commission. The Conceptual Grading
Plan, submitted in conjunction with the Tentative Map, has also been
reviewed by the Grading Committee, and received approval in concept
only (Exhibit "C ").
ANALYSIS: The proposed subdivision is consistent with the City's
General Plan Land Use Designation of Low Density, 2 -4 du's /.ac, and
the project also appears to meet current zoning requirements. The
surrounding land uses and zoning are described as follows:
ITEM D
Staff Report
TT 11696
Site
North
East
Southwest
-2-
LAND USE
Vacant
Vacant, Single Family
Single Family
Vacant, Flood Control
Channel
June 10, 1981
ZONING
R -1 -8,500
R -1 -8,500
R -1 -8,500
R -1 -8,500
The Subdivision Map has been prepared in accordance with the State
Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance. Public
access into the subdivision has been predetermined by the existing
location of Garden Court. The proposed Grading Plan utilized con-
ventional grading techniques, resulting in all lots being graded in
their entirety. However, the applicant has made an effort to avoid
excessive slopes wherever possible.
Also attached for your review is Part I of the Initial Study, as
completed by the applicant. The Staff has completed Part II of the
Initia-, Study, the Environmental Checklist and has conducted a field
investigation. As a result of the 'investigation and completion of
the study, Staff has found no significant adverse impacts on the
environment that could occur as a result of this subdivision. There-
fore, issuance of a Negative Declaration is recommended.
CORRESPONDENCE: The Tentative Map was advertised as a public hearing
item in the Daily Report newspaper. In addition, about a dozen public
hearing notices were mailed to property owners located within a 300'
radius of the tract boundaries. To date, no correspondence regarding
the proposed subdivision has been received.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission con -
duct a public is hearing and consider all public comments. If, after such
hearing, the Commission concurs with the findings and conditions recom -•
tended by Staff, the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval
with 7nditions would be appropriate.
Res,pe-tfujly,_ submi tted ;
W
BKH:OK-
A;.tachments:
Exhibit "A" -
Exhibit "B" -
Exhibit "C" -
Initial Study
Resolution of
Conditions of
Location Map
Tentative Tract Map
Conceptual Grading Plan
- Part 1
Approval
Approval
11
Imo'
LZ
Fm
1P.
M11U FI
Qw
V "QoQfM AL
M
too"., roornL{. vINSMnY
M/,
d
m
CITY Or-
RANCHO C CANMO GA
PLC NNENG DIVISION
crt• Yr[.
,MANY
Het 1
� I• 49 fs yW
r.v. awur
Y fJ
rEMTAT /VC TRAC
NORTH
IMM:
TITLE: 4e4642
. .
E\111131T:— SCALE: (.To
r,ORiM
—rcd
w�
6
L
I
�C
♦�s
4
w..wr reoruru nr�v�t
t 8
0
w
ri: �5♦
♦ i
VICINITY IWAP
E
l ter:
IT
CITY OF ITEM:
RANCHO C ��" 1,1.k NGA TITI.r:
PLANNING DIVISION EXI'II >lT: bw.�� SCALL•:
'I
I�
a
� 1
L._
nrw zrlrccr
FORTH
,I
11
.A
NORTH
tl h A IA. M
vau � �ZLT
Or rC Ml4M1Vi1v ,� /W
' � /1Y /IVpC /IFIM(�l.
�..y_
yI4YC1W4i
• '�rII1 �..v���.11 �N.
1 11• �1
�W4ta Mw1
c
�" •f GT r�
Z lei I
�YCL C�61fY L
A 41Y.�AI1® LMy
rpYM wLLA At01M(f 1iM
nt AN1.q�lp nl fin VIIMG
r
_"wwoc�
r. COU11T� _
f
�I
n" SIPECT
NORTH
CITY Or
iZ•.ANC LO CU AN IONGA TIT'-E- e-tf*
gm
PLANtiING DIVISION ExitIIiIT: �C` SCALE :_ �_.
E
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY
APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 11696
WHEREAS, 'tentative Tract Map No. 11696, hereinafter "Map"
submitted by Vanguard Venture, applicant, for the purpose of subdividiva
the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of
San Bernardino, State of California, described as a custom lot subdivision
of 2.0 acres of land in the R -1 -8,500 zone, loca ed west of Sapphire Street
at the western terminus of Garden Court - A?N 201 - 201 -33 into 6 lots,
regularly carne before the Planning Commission for public hearing and
action an June 10, 1981; and
WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map
subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning
Divisions reports; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the
Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other
evi�1cnce presented at the public hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga does resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings
in regard to Tentative Tract No. 11696 and the Map thereof:
(a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable
interim and proposed general and specific plans;
(a) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is
consistent with sil applicable interim and proposed
general and specific plans;
(c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development
proposed;
(d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause
substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to
humans and wildlife or their habitat;
(e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public
health problems;
(f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with
any easement acquired by the public at large, now of
record, for access through or use of the property within
the proposed subdivision.
Im
L_ J
r]
Resolution No.
Page 'G
(g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the
environment and a Negative Declaration is issued.
SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Ilap No. 11696, a copy of which is
attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to the attached Standard
Conditions:
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 1981.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Richard Dahl, Chairman
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Planning Commission
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution - -is duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Wonission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 10th day of June, 1981 by the following vote to-
wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
N >N J� ��OY �IU� T•.1 RJ9
A C i 1 r N N d N
�. O u + 6 ..O �. •.J N ? S C.
�•V R } w
.^.. K
J n N
d T^ W R A > M1 1L N N
•Y r y ^NN 6 +� Of1 pO,a
° LLrN �N
^.N •0 VOb 4N Wa TJ Trr
T p
^^ MO Jr jp�
47 9
w ' g r _
Yd• m° n 'o
6 � A 0 • N p n
b ' 6
s
I ^
N_
RN N
N R
� r
.O
N
o J
r.
O
N �
fi 6
>
N7
J
na
w �
ro
A
naa
°>
J n
N
w:
0
J T
N
n so a
O �
N
� 6
A
� n
v
0
J
N
O b
H�
O y
N y=
f"
�n
S
m
°
A
0
c
N
r
O
ym
S
i
'n
ti
S
N
gN
N
O>
N
N
6
N
n
0
r
v
V
a
O W
> >
N
G
{Pi
n
lily
W' Y
TY
u jy
!
MRY
ON
6r'ir
�N
R. Z.
� .J -
!.>
. >E
CaN
u.
d
YN
lA
�AV
�,w
Nom^
�
III
�V
nOT
yN
Ofni{�
w�q
RN1
+
TY
Jan
y0,
INi
^N
r
b
R6v
O
�O
GbT
un.
i
°M1a
NNC
6S
Vi.y
Y
->•.N
AN J
° •1
ouN
iM•
V] J v
y^i ,ly
41
N
✓
?I
C
O• Y
o �
A T
r
N 1 �O T
.N.
7a ii n
yJV
m�
o ^�
o 0
> R N
{O
O,d
' N
Cr
N >J
R
N6b
=N
Aw
N
f�
�^
u
W v
•O <
'o.rvro
Y N
> C moo]
n6R
>x
W
>
biN n.
Tr.
jjY
KN
6
O•tr
d
1p
NNV•<
y.
rvo.
nv
Oro n
w
n�
;1` >p.
<
.°_•.'p'
rv^
w
>,<
n °n
a'iR
>°
>�.
�
^O,�j'
a.
QN
w
db
•wOR
�rN
WOPo
>n7
i3
-�•pO
N >NV>i
7
p
A
N4
3a
6
J
~�
O W
J n
R�
J uP•
D
r
^'N
N v
1.0
W
c
N{'O
n�
nV
J'N
w�0
•°AN
WW
•°F R >ON
V"1
14
<
.Y}
�
an
A
m�'n
�-•
ppJJ
a �
O
� O -1
S C� _ ,
O W
J. ^
J
i >
l
> >
n
V
^
>
N .-
N
f• n
n ...
s
I ^
N_
RN N
N R
� r
.O
N
o J
r.
O
N �
fi 6
>
N7
J
na
w �
ro
A
naa
°>
J n
N
w:
0
J T
N
n so a
O �
N
� 6
A
� n
v
0
J
N
O b
H�
O y
N y=
f"
�n
S
m
°
A
0
c
N
r
O
ym
S
i
'n
ti
S
N
gN
N
O>
N
N
6
N
n
0
r
v
V
a
O W
> >
N
G
{Pi
n
lily
!
�I
�
III
VIII
p�
N
Y
�
41
N
✓
?I
C
O• Y
�•
p
A T
r
N 1 �O T
.N.
B>
°n
9
=N
T�
'o.rvro
-sj
�
>x
W
"_.o
biN n.
> �
i
mPm° -W
°
>♦'•.
n.
NNV•<
y.
rvo.
nv
a
w
n�
;1` >p.
a.. wn
.°_•.'p'
rv^
w
>,<
n °n
a'iR
>°
>�.
�
^O,�j'
a.
QN
w
db
•wOR
�rN
WOPo
>n7
T�
-�•pO
N >NV>i
7
p
>N
N4
3a
S
n
RT6
>O
RN
rnb
^'N
1.0
j•
N{'O
n�
nV
J'N
w�0
•°AN
WW
•°F R >ON
V"1
14
<
.Y}
ppJJ
n r. V_r r
� O -1
S C� _ ,
O W
J. ^
J
i >
l
> >
n
^
N .-
f• n
n ...
.ri
•{ C
y
JN
�O�iu
WO:
T�
W.O R.=
�
iSr_
LN
>
N6
.41
•Yry
;O
p
O
�V n 2 R A
rfWi
r
N
�.
a O
> N
O'
ry N
j • •�•
>'
N
p S {a
M1
N
V
O n
n
O a-
J r
ol
N
O.n
t�N
Onj u>•Nq
AN
�SCA•'W
O
J
°
?N
^
>
W>
° O dC
O qq
E d
4 A
A
Rw
A
�
Y
a
�.
rv'
a
l J J
1 p
4. ♦
J
O
n L t
R S N _.
O r
^
_.. un• t
w
�
a
y
on'N ���"'
.'�-
°.
Nic�w.'
t
°m
°�
ni
,ncv
•:°
v°
N
t
w,
c°
n�
^
> Z w
N
r•
V i
T n l a O
J
^
"{ r S
N
l J
Tl
n V,
W
> W J
rw
V N
6
1 N
T S n
W
O+
\ O
C N
x
i�
c
.O J
6 J b N
S -. •y �
�
�^ ;
6
p
N
O.
N>
N
V •< W
j�
•.
n=
R
N
°C
,
•n•
o
T
r
-1 o°. nN..
^y
r
D]
°
a`N °�^O'
o'cvv
.0
>°
q
� J N P i
O N
-{ 2
° a^..
°
L
? ^!i
N.°c
am
•'O
°
� �
9
d•
�p w
o>
`n
R6
�o
n
,n- W
6<
W.�♦ -'.
O
J a>
W W a•
R
.'+
n3'N
6
u°.
-'
'°
6
u^i w
Q ^'
^
N O
N
W
� w
a
>
b
�•PC
n W
J
O
.0 Y W J
-W..•puLi
rf �
6 >
d
P
-�
J
:!
^
NS i.
N
W
•
r
N
r�O
N
O
N
♦
T
7
c
TN
O6
WJtiw
.O.
nO
N
R
.>i
O
4
6
A
n
'J
O
O
T
Q
S
0
m
n
n
♦
El
A
1
Y
•1u
rl '
a
n
O
Im I
IN
I_
%.
.O
m
O• V.
6 W
� s � �'
Y � r• j? � Vi D
6 D
t� N A
N m d I.'.
_ w F t0 n� m
P 3.
>
O N j'
'.�..[ t
%.
�Wb
^
r...D
NtvO
l�Ip
r
w
nC+- ^L +•>dr
wPN 6VVJJ N
wn
.<i.�O.O
..
r T r. Y Y
ro evi r. W VPi r �. N .r
� d
� r J
�� F
I•li I D > O �
N n
M r N L
w n�
1, S Oe••
G YN
-•O > '•
p C -.
}p
� �
'q
ryD`
NV W
.^i.
N yV F >>
r.
OP +.T
N„
W r ,
y
`M >• p
qJ ^Nf'
yn >y >.O
^n
TL n1p .0
yr
>N.A
10
�wc�oP
'Y nn
an.
va^�o
p
N •�"
'N'�� W
�a
row
o.'-i°
ndNN
i3
�b
hoc
>nN Cq
fJ N
>'
F6 nuN•N
>,J
T'
w6
O...N
OLw
l'lnq^ 1gi�N
>�
lgrd�
��_
W N
°r
F
oA
nr
s
a
�
. ro
a ^iiN
v rr
N
r r
�r.R
NO r>•:• �9 W
I +•
t
•)•6F
v
O n9
60J
�W
°
m
O
O P q.
2• NN IO
fi> a �>
N� .b r>
�
l
J --S•..
ro40 �
(^y �. P
uGt
} N u
�w Y
n.. ^^. P��
T��lr V•Nn
6N
rJN
NF.
Vr40.N
CrV�
W
9r_ 6
r w
�O q
6K 01 N
on rgi _
,I• y
O .9
J
ii
i
b�°.PJ
a
OJ
C�
N <
,•
�N
y n o•
v
J V ro >,
> a
�>•_
Via.
..nv
nWu0P3
a
Imn r--
NP
isln,
vr
a49 uv
> n
Jr Sb w+d`
N
S
F64
�N
110
:
2-V
Nry
��>
l
N O
6C
C 6 w14 <
OOd•+
q
l u.
N q+J>
14 S
T
�
bd
W
� � l a.r
v +.
°-.• >
m .J..
r
n i
N
r
O-
�
ud
.°b
.N.
�
q0 NnJ
>K >6W >,q
l0.
^
6�•S
'N
J >
Wl col
c'
ro�
y�
uT+.n
V
DSi
7qc p-.
O 6
'�
p;
O y. r
w Y� W c n 6
• 'p
T D r
>� r n e N_
N r
f. F+
NNNO_
O N
T
N
Na
IO
�-F
lqr
P
>• NPn >WryN
NIK +-6 -J l
6°
•O
6IO FNP
^�
P tp
>n
y a
n•O
n0 S O.O a�
T
Ci
<
.
� q J
u J
we
rN Vro Wn
J
K
a:�
tF
Na>nW
J
O
i
e+
O
m o
Wro m
Nn OS�
V• �ro n+•
q
tN
1D
+.N OO JD
"'•�
r
.. n
Ow
6 l
nW F
0. +. q
O •t
.l«
••. ^ , O
G O, S
d
J
O
l
W
O u
O 4 6
J N d A
6 �•.
n
T
N r
C N
O
^>
O LL Y
j > C
r
r
V H •t N
W' fwJ
= d
N
_
O � O. n� 10
F
d +•
O
,J W O
6
O.+^.
N
N
DC
MN >�>
Kr4O bSnn
J
O
>VCO
N LRq
O
O
O,O
A
>;6
• Ip q G
Nq rid
t
>+•
�W
�
q�
09
l�
Y S'O
yVN.j
F.O
N S4
IN O
r•wq
^
Sa
Sr LaP
��J rO�yJT
O
.1tN
On-W.
lSr
VNNO >
R T
O•�
3 OT
p
U
U
?
_N
O
Q
a00F
p>
r 6 !J d
> N W� ro F N_
V••
6
<� _S pO
O
O
.>r•ry
^^
dm
°
A
0.
lC
�y
tl
>T
b
SK > 6
i0 l
>
4
n
o.d-.
S
Q
I
I
i IN
Ir
��
IW
I,
I•
� I•
I i
P
N
L
W
VJ
O
T4.}v.
nd
09
O< %r�.O
n
6FT
�}
��rT.j Tv NV� NIb
➢
TJJ
CAA
.nC£>
NA `d-I
r 2 d r O
L O.
b M1 N
n N
� N
J
9 D
r. W C
K
>FYN
N ID
N O P r N
Ll J
nl
NniO
N JOO•L�rLO
4W r R»
Aq J
n••Ol
•W
d
�M
r- r
ap3
•
•I v G e d
> fj
v
L
l
O1
.>�.. a n
Nom{
r. n ib
r
t0.0 y°
.-1
.•O. ro 1>w
T 9
=('� n D'-
9 I ^ U .OD T q O
A b d J N
O N �
`� J.
Ot > n n
N
> r.
•N � N
> m
q W r
N O r
j0
w
l
lN�q
q
N
WTW
�O.
gNJ
rin
NfT
�0VJ06��
O. 6
•Wr•
vq
J1-J
OSu•
V14�
�O
r.0
Nr.W 'N
N Nlw
>
l�N
C+9•r
d q
rn
NJQ
OHO.
6 >O
OI O =>
V.Yd
nW
1°
VNN
N C
r Y Y
q
O
106
+
} n 9.e
roN
°�
ID
n
n
nn
i
...
qi•
• '�
>
J �QYO ,
P
N vb
mP
vas
N l
m
uA
v, a
H
d
N <o
q
°. n:
>
vCc
o' 1C .y`^
r ..
r>
•1• S S r
O
�
K
•3
N S
u• O
b? N
M
S N
F W C C
r6^
N j. N n
••Si O
n
^ n N
l
w %'
NN
J .D
N
lfq nN
q TW ••.
n N^
r
C
r
a d
rtNN
pC
•t=
r
Irl
N
O
NO
NN
N.0
�j
n n
iri
Ol OH
'n<
l+�C
rFa
F Sry
9u
dv
�N
age
N
N N �•
N
q
O
> a
43'
n`
Ww O T
J
�y
.•. 4
1 J
p>
2G1N>
O
WO
<F
drN
+' N
N4
dJ
"jn=1
pN
t;
Nn
�
N
•l0•
69
�_^
Otl
Wi?
> Oq
wbr _ufi
-.Q
�.NNr
q�D
Wu I
O
+ fS�
4 6
d
W�
d Y
qn NN6 T
q
r L,n
O
OOv
O.
O.l
N
9
_
.-O.N
O n o
>
N •C•
•y N
O g n J N N
�.
l
V V 9
a
n
N iir
V r1>O
O d N
6 b
r
N Q
C
d
o.
-.
O y
F_
S
q� G L 7
•I
P l
>�
O
n
q O
O O
9
T T
N N
C n n!.
� N n
S y
> W
m•
ti
N
N r.
N
N
L N �
6 n
O.
�
l G
r
S
F� O. O
n
d W
i N
l' •.N•
�
^ :•
O q
N
> N
^ J n
C n
N q>
S
-
f}j N O .. t7 O^
N n .en
} On..>
FA
V°>•
�
O q
•.
>6
Kp
>9
t•O
n
1 0
6
4^
O^
N
TOi.
S
>_
q •na
N .d.• W
N 1Y , N
�.
W
q 0
>
••
n
rO
,�
y 'J Y
On
O°
dA
r
nL }�+•L
O
.Ji.
P4
0
S
•
1p
_
a
n
O
w
I II
N 8 W
r0 T
tomes
l +•
9 V a
ti
3 N N
W l N
r n 9
m «
^ ¢N
r
O �
T H r
� u A
A u
Ju
�W
sN;
^� 7
N � b
� 6^
Nn
O yn
s�
^ r
n a
u�
iN
N y
tJ l
S
c
i
N
J
n
J
¢
n_
W
0
O
7
D
,
a
O
A
�v
,
C
r
N
N
N
n
W
rN
w w w
ntan
6 � �
O O n
a oJin
� N q
O O O
J p D
I�, hIQ
O rJ O
r.b ° rD •'
G l6
w W = t
N
•� J 6 � S
N N
T •n
u: R
T1 v. N IDnN.
N •C n
T a ro
N t
O N y
a N
�W
t0 D
S J
O N r
� J ,
o aN
J � �
< N
q ^
Y
a
Y
•G
a;�
y!
Q y`i
N =
w
O
b
y
a
n
Y
O
if
s
0
Ggn
4'
•i
x
S
pn
Y
Q
C9
iD
r
O d C y O
d i
< �n
A d d
A W r
a
- aL
n 6n
e N D
N
3�
4 G
o�T
6 a S
N N
DN
n.'
OF.
ANtni
r.. r
Wo^S
^ n r
r •+O
.TV m
iNO)
1 n +_
On�
+•• O V
N ¢n
^6�
N LL
7
A
V r
• N
n
y
t
C
0
L•
3
A
Y
(l
t
S
m
T
O
4l
6 nµN nr ^N
N <
A r 4•T ? 6SW V
•ASnl +1
CQQ IL �O N WW
6��•<N �Tnr
r D
Noi cam+ NQQN �.q.
J dWr (or6�
m �$J �..N. •ic
•nm nr •i6i
+ d w
7i
•O+ N -.n
O +W 6 �•
N J
6+ W O N S q •1
O W g N J J N N
N rNb n06r•-
W
n n•n w N T j Cp
n!. Da0
N
an 1.
O w n A O
04 r.J
0 o N N
O T A
T
N tn0k N sSnJ Y. +. °K�
n N•r.A l J W 4n0
nr�� -••6 =d•fiV
W J yJA N N +y r ry a
n Ty•On�� n.°.6A W
c w:qn< n
A A r N r
S��,NNiDC�N;
ao' a:'r'Nn ��•r`
J O �•( i r • ,
o r •� r �. q• w i1 u
n ��D AOr °C NO
� 60•C :.6 •4T r w
D JO NC �.ry
b• D°i N � O S4 N n
A . =r
r n'nNOwfgi' W
V GNJr;�n�•�
^SJ J•••C �i �•
w r
A
. �C �.
�2 rTV Pm�J l
Y, W rD i r v
� N V ••. Cj
�• O r
j� rO c N4ND •4
�i- .nno�N
-• N n
N
W p. tin M. W N D eJ'ry
p N O
_ T N OA O C M C'O O N n •J
-•ff .0 SO'W l rbN OCl wN_N i�W tlb T �b�•O
S�V 6b0 aN�O rnJCN N +, n"°t'C iOl J�•O ^ip ypn - •0.n••t
N l n 1, � G N r r [� ll W N O p�•
WA n.p N� � N �O -G 6W WJT O C,r¢ n, r' •OW "•�T
•no n� W m° min W Jv <a ocm ��.°:. ^ vro� W A or o J.
T'Po'op� JoN e n 'or 't o'mA N0.D o bbrTnn
JO DMtpN r.J NOA?I r4' Jr.N N WTyN ] "•� e� O ^
Y. 'J r1 ••• S U l N A N N N W •� .W..6 A N O pr 0.A
In- M SA n,o' n O ^� W,• ��¢ J Ar Op •+•N N °
'l -n-,WN N T6NAn nW ,j'n
t Rr•' •w tY OO V]A
T .•J E A w V_• ;
^n r-r i Nr nw N Rn Q D'tC
V N
n O _i tN i r 6 tAU �. V •� , N T} M C r J ZL
N rrb r 6�.O.. W A ^N r
T r n ,ir � _oon non ¢Nio o �m n � n YO W
m � 0I._. ��b � � �na c �$ 3m •u r�aO �.0 '"� +w`+cry
G�. .17^ iDrU nn.:W rN0• V �•,- bLL n JNn
n6O•WJ RND r_a .... 1On N•Cn , SOL W_ O.A.O
n¢
J t0 n N n i C T 2 a •4nt,' 4 O W �• 6
O.p O
W OO�O� Nn7 y'n .�..r vN} onG N <00' ArN � nOr .nD
N o o n
W a J 9 a
np LL
OWnNw �¢ 6Y? ^O.O ir.Y �Nb r Y.�O Tq n O S
O •-• 4 .S C A n r t0 n D r• T Q N TD N
C -�_ °T rNw NGT w� 9 �r� o' vrir5
�n1 iD � o' r W •e
Wb 7yG 1DG iy n' DJ^ rA .. ^NT y � ltinr
^O u n b N 4 r
° •nD P � n^ � m
o
0
0
R
�O
n
x
H x
Q a
r
O C y
� r
J'o
c'
•D..°
9�
�
� u•°mi
Bn °m Ji
��
nr
us
9oN
mN
.N. D'
a
pn
'�:
9
A.. O.
N
N.••rnry
�q
n6
Nw
aT=
0•r
NO•..OT
qqa
..16 .
��yG
♦dro
N.N..
��_
NW LLJ
nnw
yO
Cj0
Ni
��b
T
nJ
NO
ON
W^
NDN
,P
r
ianFN
�~rT w•R
rf^Nq�
TY
J
r
ID l O•
n b IO r.
L
C
r
^
•+
... T
F-•
iD r3
°<
c
•-
o�[•
gr..-
n�
w A
•^.
c
ono J.
°yo'bc
•n
�
_
n
r. ro r
b n
W ..•. J r
b< �
i ,Nn'
°¢
,.n,
m
T �
J w N D.
•°D
fO
n
_°
+�
-�
4
n
yJ
nG`•O
6i.<'yj
O=
r.y
p g
S
�
�I, OV
n
QOr
Nn
Cr.
r.
R��N
YN WNm
•nN
� _.
O P
�¢
S
A 6�
O N m 1
N r O
C G
�
•O
In
T A
?.O
C S
N N
A
A
6
10 W
•� 7 N •~y
O, C
x
v4i
N •c
«
W v_
10 N v
J
N.
_
M On
N^ r. D
O .. w
•.
4
0
N
�O
Op
t.0
l
ni ..
• O
O N
j
QQ l
N.yT6
2 ��
N
-•'
N
I II
N 8 W
r0 T
tomes
l +•
9 V a
ti
3 N N
W l N
r n 9
m «
^ ¢N
r
O �
T H r
� u A
A u
Ju
�W
sN;
^� 7
N � b
� 6^
Nn
O yn
s�
^ r
n a
u�
iN
N y
tJ l
S
c
i
N
J
n
J
¢
n_
W
0
O
7
D
,
a
O
A
�v
,
C
r
N
N
N
n
W
rN
w w w
ntan
6 � �
O O n
a oJin
� N q
O O O
J p D
I�, hIQ
O rJ O
r.b ° rD •'
G l6
w W = t
N
•� J 6 � S
N N
T •n
u: R
T1 v. N IDnN.
N •C n
T a ro
N t
O N y
a N
�W
t0 D
S J
O N r
� J ,
o aN
J � �
< N
q ^
Y
a
Y
•G
a;�
y!
Q y`i
N =
w
O
b
y
a
n
Y
O
if
s
0
Ggn
4'
•i
x
S
pn
Y
Q
C9
iD
r
O d C y O
d i
< �n
A d d
A W r
a
- aL
n 6n
e N D
N
3�
4 G
o�T
6 a S
N N
DN
n.'
OF.
ANtni
r.. r
Wo^S
^ n r
r •+O
.TV m
iNO)
1 n +_
On�
+•• O V
N ¢n
^6�
N LL
7
A
V r
• N
n
y
t
C
0
L•
3
A
Y
(l
t
S
m
T
O
4l
6 nµN nr ^N
N <
A r 4•T ? 6SW V
•ASnl +1
CQQ IL �O N WW
6��•<N �Tnr
r D
Noi cam+ NQQN �.q.
J dWr (or6�
m �$J �..N. •ic
•nm nr •i6i
+ d w
7i
•O+ N -.n
O +W 6 �•
N J
6+ W O N S q •1
O W g N J J N N
N rNb n06r•-
W
n n•n w N T j Cp
n!. Da0
N
an 1.
O w n A O
04 r.J
0 o N N
O T A
T
N tn0k N sSnJ Y. +. °K�
n N•r.A l J W 4n0
nr�� -••6 =d•fiV
W J yJA N N +y r ry a
n Ty•On�� n.°.6A W
c w:qn< n
A A r N r
S��,NNiDC�N;
ao' a:'r'Nn ��•r`
J O �•( i r • ,
o r •� r �. q• w i1 u
n ��D AOr °C NO
� 60•C :.6 •4T r w
D JO NC �.ry
b• D°i N � O S4 N n
A . =r
r n'nNOwfgi' W
V GNJr;�n�•�
^SJ J•••C �i �•
w r
A
. �C �.
�2 rTV Pm�J l
Y, W rD i r v
� N V ••. Cj
�• O r
j� rO c N4ND •4
�i- .nno�N
-• N n
N
W p. tin M. W N D eJ'ry
p N O
_ T N OA O C M C'O O N n •J
-•ff .0 SO'W l rbN OCl wN_N i�W tlb T �b�•O
S�V 6b0 aN�O rnJCN N +, n"°t'C iOl J�•O ^ip ypn - •0.n••t
N l n 1, � G N r r [� ll W N O p�•
WA n.p N� � N �O -G 6W WJT O C,r¢ n, r' •OW "•�T
•no n� W m° min W Jv <a ocm ��.°:. ^ vro� W A or o J.
T'Po'op� JoN e n 'or 't o'mA N0.D o bbrTnn
JO DMtpN r.J NOA?I r4' Jr.N N WTyN ] "•� e� O ^
Y. 'J r1 ••• S U l N A N N N W •� .W..6 A N O pr 0.A
In- M SA n,o' n O ^� W,• ��¢ J Ar Op •+•N N °
'l -n-,WN N T6NAn nW ,j'n
t Rr•' •w tY OO V]A
T .•J E A w V_• ;
^n r-r i Nr nw N Rn Q D'tC
V N
n O _i tN i r 6 tAU �. V •� , N T} M C r J ZL
N rrb r 6�.O.. W A ^N r
T r n ,ir � _oon non ¢Nio o �m n � n YO W
m � 0I._. ��b � � �na c �$ 3m •u r�aO �.0 '"� +w`+cry
G�. .17^ iDrU nn.:W rN0• V �•,- bLL n JNn
n6O•WJ RND r_a .... 1On N•Cn , SOL W_ O.A.O
n¢
J t0 n N n i C T 2 a •4nt,' 4 O W �• 6
O.p O
W OO�O� Nn7 y'n .�..r vN} onG N <00' ArN � nOr .nD
N o o n
W a J 9 a
np LL
OWnNw �¢ 6Y? ^O.O ir.Y �Nb r Y.�O Tq n O S
O •-• 4 .S C A n r t0 n D r• T Q N TD N
C -�_ °T rNw NGT w� 9 �r� o' vrir5
�n1 iD � o' r W •e
Wb 7yG 1DG iy n' DJ^ rA .. ^NT y � ltinr
^O u n b N 4 r
° •nD P � n^ � m
o
0
0
R
�O
4.
N
J
n
i
Y]
6
IW
R
O
N
1
p
m
ti
L
�I
-IW
it
nL
no-
>S
+a4r
Y.�
i
1n
Y_
rq
rLL•a
<c+
NN
'I
r11w
i4
ins
y
y""
W 2
,�.
40
r 1K
I
rNm
�n
�r
=NiYK
W <bn
Tr1
Cw ..
Y m
14 �
n'ST,
Oq
ni i
u Z O �b
TSN n
p•
N
J.•
�N
;y �r.
�NP
��;
N,
0���
uNi9
p�Y
7
�v
O G
O
9c1
1
T
�J
bO
nS
rT
S.
O'�. -il`
N10
'f
n"NO
JNO ^in
On R'
T
d9
l O N
N�
wr
rJ IV
.y
S
nN
N =
m�.l
• =Y]
rT.
w
'1 P .V..
y
'E.
iv
np N
r
W N
I
K= N N V
n n
b r
N N W
S P
N,
d M1
p O
S r0
C N
N J
V
< F
l O
J W
O
n N
T^ V
N l
Z l
9
N M1OM n
Sn
J
son ^C-�
=
VN
moA
fOri j�K
N=
N
Ed
l'Ip
ZW
n0
^v'i 0
V. N
4
n1K
oOa
Yn�
�Nq
ama
fl
r
VS
J N
T
Al. ?e
r
,
S r w
N
N V
Va
W S
Y
.Wi.
410
N
rte.
_•
PO.
>TO
l ltl
N
Y =
nNrvn
W
. W 0.
=
09,
^
r.AOm
K 1
M1b�
IF
.N..
-
°O
,N
�0n
*.--.
��
drW Nom•
Fq
0
nJ
O
10 �._
WN
N
N T
Nry � n O
J
O•
4 N
= n r=
b• O
N
2
+
•O
O
N W
C
n b =>
N
.^+.
O
a q N
C T n P
L TK
y
o
o
rvn
^
W
v w
°
O
P
N
n
S
N
= O
J
4
N
4.
N
J
n
i
Y]
6
IW
R
O
N
1
rA
7 N
N ,
p C
o^
N
r
Y
b
D
J
b
9
i
N
N
C
6
n
n
N
� D
b �
>
T�
u
�c
N IJ
q
r O
V
�2
0.
N
2�
q N
n�
raj
`S Y
W a
�.O
N O
F F
o`x
_
in
N Q
n �
• a
I
,~ N
N
F c O a
1Y =
ro
Y I 'e �
J nn
nb w
N c T
n C
n 1
r¢N
Y] n T
A�
NO
o < ro
Ti0
r N
_ J
J N
NGN
J � r
O
7 �
T C
N n
0.�
G ••
P •�
i O
Nf
�E
Wa
�o
Yi
K
•ice
® r,
VI A W N •• I„ VI N V T b A
W N
_<
p
m
ti
L
�I
-IW
it
nL
no-
>S
+a4r
Y.�
i
1n
Y_
rq
rLL•a
<c+
NN
'I
i4
ins
ib
s m
y""
CC
,�.
40
I
rNm
�n
9
z •-
T
J ^6
iYON
Cw ..
Y m
N•n
O
N,
m b
r�
7
�v
O G
O
9c1
1
6
�J
bO
nS
rT
S.
nI�
^R
I �?
ti
rA
7 N
N ,
p C
o^
N
r
Y
b
D
J
b
9
i
N
N
C
6
n
n
N
� D
b �
>
T�
u
�c
N IJ
q
r O
V
�2
0.
N
2�
q N
n�
raj
`S Y
W a
�.O
N O
F F
o`x
_
in
N Q
n �
• a
I
,~ N
N
F c O a
1Y =
ro
Y I 'e �
J nn
nb w
N c T
n C
n 1
r¢N
Y] n T
A�
NO
o < ro
Ti0
r N
_ J
J N
NGN
J � r
O
7 �
T C
N n
0.�
G ••
P •�
i O
Nf
�E
Wa
�o
Yi
K
•ice
® r,
VI A W N •• I„ VI N V T b A
W N
_<
p
r�Y
r
it
nL
>S
+a4r
Y.�
NPy
Y_
rq
rLL•a
<c+
NN
_
i4
ins
y""
CC
,�.
40
I
rNm
�n
.O
J ^6
iYON
N,
7
O
9c1
1
6
Wwb
bO
nS
rT
CN
nI�
^R
I �?
d9
N�
wr
\mG
r.b
T R
S
=ILm
O
.N.. =N
O n n
'1 P .V..
y
'E.
iv
np N
r
I
�• n�
Y
.N.
•i=.
S r0
C N
N J
V
< F
l O
J W
O
n N
T^ V
N l
Z l
9
VN
moA
W
N
Ed
l'Ip
ZW
n0
y
: N
^
n
�Sn
>O
r
VS
J N
T
Al. ?e
r
N N
N
N V
Va
W S
Y
.Wi.
410
•�
\
00
_•
PO.
_
N
V,
„N
y.^
=
09,
^
tp r
K 1
J r
°O
u0 a
rN
��
drW Nom•
Fq
0
nJ
O
10 �._
WN
N
Ofl
ry,
�rb
6r
Fn �.d
1IS
NN
CO
R
y
o
o
rvn
^
W
v w
°
,
N
v w
°
Ov
M^
�o
�o
vno
3.•
n
nR
2- u
�j
'a2
N
4
W i9
N
0
01
bO
t I)
r
W^
N W
N
Y ry ui
O
m
n
o
T
d
%
O
N=
=
+
T O
=d
ro T ,.
^ N
1a
r^
=N
Cn
N
J
T.N
Cl
n
n
'^
WpN 1
mW
n
,N
NnC
06
N
3
,N
�
a
�Y.
y
.w�
b
S
C
n•�
p
1 4
w
^an,
er
N r
b
u
N
O
b m V N
S W
N �
N
m °N
V, o
1
N N
m
n r
Z
Fo
S 7
aP
Y]
> r
q n
r�
u W
N N
N
9f S
O �
P r
i
4 N
N
6
n
w
0
r
r ro
Y
Y N
b Y
u m m
^Y a
N r
O'
T m
C_ N
m °
6 N
iN
N O
� o
le. -.
x�i
T
N
yn „
N �
nJ
O b
� b
O
N �
ID N
N J
Y b
m s
o
J
S 7
q C
Fl C
PN N
P
z�T
n e.
VC �1
K
� W
N
N N
S
N O
N�
C
I�
_
!N
yo b w b
J r 4 =
N r N
N p ry N
ern a.N
r W
N d O
a ao
y
n o
•� N d
T S \
6 -e
rK„
N 3 O
•�10 J
C J n
= N C
T•
;Ya ^_
F
(n n V,
:1 T WS
N r
e
aQ>
Ii N
q � r
O f n
N7 N r
Y
6 r.
w
N
�0.
er _.
N
M W
.N.. ry
= y
N
^ N
N *YI
nio
O n
_
^O
l
nn
as
O N
J u
S n
N
6
u ry
W b
N
q N
. u
A
C
a
6 fY
t9
= N
N =
N ;
z Y
�n
W
N d
b
d N
m
Mc
Ixir
O N
N ,
IN r
J
W O
N
C.
4
l
N
A
6
7r
n
T r.
N � N
P m
l
o`q
4 � O
t N
+ = O
=KH
nw
C W
n
qO Tpr
W SN
o sw
O N
T � b
w
q N N
1
U N r•
L 6�
N O N
O. l
P 6.f
N �
m
T Y
_
6
ry
N N
O ry
n
N W
N r
N_ y
N
W
N �
O
Op
N
C
r
a
Y
6
N
1..
b
M
CT
E
e II
.)
fJ.
an
a
w
ro
ld
rn
s
�\
A i r
•r =
O T� �
V}
V T
N }
q
O
l b p
V O,
``
Or=iAN
Nl
Nr
dTYO
�
IJ'
+n0
O,�N +I
w W
V4' -
Nldn�
Ibl > n
n
a
Iv ^'•c
O n m}
r
-1
r<
O O
'
I{'
Of•
•P: �•LO
^
�'
l W
O W r.0
'�
�
� m„
.,�
PmN D>
�+Il
[>in
r•7
TR
u
nrOn
6, n0
�
� fT
� Sk>
BNID
J
n•
ONUN
Ow�•
]
IN
9>
r Cs
p�.iw
6N
r10d
JW
'P ,
K "• G
L rl
N W T
M� r
N>
r L
Ii n 1^
M 4
r -•.
�
r T N
O, ry N
N
ma'>n
°n n•
Tuo
pi °-%�
WAN
m
oW �
I°i.o
n
.'
Iii
N
1
'n
+d
nmNa
'j
roa
o
NLZ >c.
^
Ef
ril°.v.Ni
wwwi
a
_�
> n
°IJ
ii mRw
M
W T+ A
=
n.rn W
�
O
••e
O O `
� W N
w N Op
� tNy
SI
+�
VSr n
ull
Z _r
>
l V.
N b N
O
w� O
N
V C
N E•
Q
J
[lam
N
K r w
ly
nn6
r ^l
�
N
N
rJ
NN
prw
4
S C
C.
>
O V
N •+
O
lT n>
>
C
3V r
.0 N
N
n
E
e II
ITEM E'
r ---- —CITY OF ItAiNCl-10 Cl O\G--k CG '�
0 !
Y
F Zto
DATE: June 10, 1981 �3L
1977
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner
BY: Otto Kroutil, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS14ENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11663
P.D. N0. 80- 2 - MARLBOROUGH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
A total development of 413 townhouses on 40 acres in
the R -2 zone, located on the east side of Archibald,
on the south side of Church and west side of Ramona -
APN 1077- 341 -01, 1077- 133 -08, and 1077- 631 -03
ABSTRACT- The applicant is requesting approval of a planned develop-
ment snd of the associated tentative tract map. The project will consist
of 413 townhouse units, to be located between Archibald and Ramona, south
of Church. In general, the project meets development and design standards;
however, Staff is recommending several modifications Which will effect
pedestrian circulation, landscaping, fire access, and recreational facili-
ties. Should the Commission concur with these modifications, conditional
approval as recommended, would be appropriate.
BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting review and approval of a
tentative tract map and a total development package consisting of 413
townhouse untis to be located on about 40 acres of land located between
Archibald and Ramona Avenues, south of Church Street (Exhibit "A " ), The
project site is vacant, and is not in use at this time. However, there
are a number of mature Eudalyptus trees and a Cedar tree located on the
premises.
The project site is zoned R -2, multiple family residential,, and is
designated for nedium density residential (.4 -14 du's /ac) on the City's
General Plan. The proposed project density of about 10.8 dwellings per
acre is therefore consistent with the General Plan. The project site
is surrounded by the following land uses and zoning:
LAND USE ZONING
Site Vacant R -2
North Single Family Residences R -1
East Single Family Residences R -1
South Single Family Residences R -1
Nest Apartments, Single Family R -'s, R -1, R -3
Residences, Elementary School
The project has been reviewed and rated by the design Review and Growth
Management Review Committees in accordance with the Growth Management
ITEM E'
0
Staff Report
TT 11663 (P. D. 80 -12)
Ordinance.
threshold,
addition,
Committee,
-2-
June 10, 1981
The project received a point rating in excess of the required
and is therefore eligible for Planning Commission review. In
the conceptual grading plan has been reviewed by the Grading
and received approval in concept only.
ANALYSIS: As rioted above, the project will consist of 413 townhouse
units (Exhibit "B "). Each dwelling will have a two -car attached garage,
and a private fenced patio. Five basic plans will be available as follows,
(Ex!Abits Fl -F5):
Unit
Height
Type
Size
Plan
1
1 -story
2
bed, 1 bath
936
sq.
ft.
Pian
2
1 -story
2
bed, 2 bath
1,022
sq.
ft.
Plan
3
2 -story
2
bed, 23,, bath
1,122
sq.
ft.
Plan
4
2 -story
3
bed, 21, bath
1,290
sq.
ft.
Plan
5
2 -story
3
bed, 21z bath
1,450
sq.
ft.
All unit sizes noted in the table above include living areas only; 400+ sq.
ft. garages will also be provided for each dwelling. According to plans,
all dwellings will be clustered in rows of 3 -6 dwelli-ng units each., as.
follows:
Tri -plex 7 (21 units]
Four -plex 28 (112 units)
Five -plex 2 X10 units)
Six -plex 45 (270 units
Total: 82 (413 units
The main vehicular access point is located on Archibald Avenue, with 2
additional points of access on Ramona Avenue. In addition to the 2 -car
garages, approximately 327 additional parking spaces will be provided in
open areas and along the project streets and drives, resulting in parking
ratiosof about 2.85 spaces per unit, which exceeds the minimum requirement.
The pedestrian circulation within the project is comprised by a series of
private sidewalks and walkways located throughout the project. However,
the 22sign Review Committee is recommending that texturized pedestrian
crosswalks be incorporated into the design of the project to connect
dwellings with open space and recreational facilities, and that additional
walkways be constructed to provide a continuous system. Conditions of ap-
proval to that effect have been included in the Resolution for your consi-
deration.
The main recreational facilities are centrally located and include a swimming
pool, spa, 2 tennis courts, and a recreation center. In addition, 2 smaller
recreational areas consisting of a pool and a spa are proposed in the northerly
and southerly portions of the project. In the southeast corner of the site
11
[71J
11
Staff Report
TT 11653
-3-
1`
June 10, 1981
the applicant is proposing to construct a temporary retention basin to
accomodate potential overflows, and to avoid possible flooding of Ramona
Avenue. The retention basin will be fenced, (Staff is requesting that
wrought-iron fencing be provided rather than chainlink as originally
proposed) and its perimeter will be heavily landscaped. The interior of
the basin will be seeded with grass and will be used as a. children's play
area. If, at some point in the future, a master planned storm drain is
constructed in the vicinity of the project and the need for the retention
basin is eliminated, 8 additional dwellings (units no. 406 through 413)
could be constructed and sold by the Homeowners Association. The use of
the retention basin as a childrei-.'s play area will provide a reasonable
use at this open area when not used for retention purpcses. However,
such facilities are temporary. Therefore, Staff is recommending that
additional children play areas be provided elsewhere in this project,
According to the submitted plans, the applicant will be providing a sub-
stantial amount of landscaping along Archibald Avenue, which has been
designated as a Special Boulevard (Exhibit "'C "). Structural setbacks
along Archibald will be kept to a 351 minimum, with the average setback
exceeding 40'. The setback area will be heavily landscaped and the
existing mature Cedar tree will be preserved. Along Ramona Avenue,
standard striccturai setbacks of 25' will be provi'e.d.. However, the appli-
cant is proposing to construct private patios, bounded by wails not to
exceed 42" in height, within the 25' setback area along portions of Ramona.
Avenue frontage. Along the westerly boundaries
where the proposed development abuts the existing apartment complex and
school, the landscape plan indicates a minimum of 15 feet of landscaping,
including a substantial number of trees. However„ the Fire District is
requesting that 15 foot wide fire lanes be provided along these boundaries,
eliminating all trees and shrubs in the process (Exhibit "B "). Staff has
reviewed this alternative withthe Design Review Committee, and concluded
that the total elimination of landscaping in these two critical areas is
not acceptable. It is recommended that the size: plan provide a minimum of
10 feet of landscaping, including shrubs and trees, at these locations, and
that other alternatives of fire access and protection be explored with the
Foothill Fire District.
The Design Review Committee also reviewed the building elevations and
architectural design of the project and was very satisfied with the style
of the buildings and the amount of detailing incorporated into the design
of the patio walls (Exhibit "D "). Color renderings and elevations of
these buildings will be available for review and comment at the Planning
Commission meeting.
Attached is Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant.
AVA Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the Environmental Check-
list, and found no significant adverse impacts or the environment that
could occur as a result of this project. The issuance of a Negative
Declaration is recommended.
Staff Report
TT 11663 -4-
June 10, 1981
CORRESPONDENCE: A notice of public hearing was placed in the Daily Report
newspaper,, In addition, approximately 195 public he -ring notifications were
mailed to the surrounding property owners. Several property owners in the
single family tract to the east have discussed this project with. Staff to
cl;irify the design of the project. No specific objections were filed or
voiced.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission review
the proposed Planned Development and Tentative Map, and condu_t a public
hearing to consider all public comments. Tf, after such hearing, the
Commission concurs with the attached findings and proposed conditions of
approval, a motion to adopt the attached Resolutions of approval, with
conditions, would be appropriate.
Res ctful y submitted,
_R K. HO� �r
C yty Planne
RKN-.OK:cd
Attachments:
Exhibit
"A"
- Site Utilization Map
Exhibit
"B"
- Site Plan
Exhibit
118-1"
- Phasing Plan
Exhibit
"C"
- Conceptual Landscape
Exhibit
"C -1"
-• Conceptual Landscape
Exhibit
"D"
- Typical Elevations
Exhibit
"E"
- Recreation Building
Exhibit
"E -1"
- Recreation Building
Exhibit
"j'•I
- Typical Six -plex
Exhibit
"F -1"
- Floor Plan 1
Exhibit
'°F -2"
- Floor Plan 2
Exhibit
"F -S"
- Floor Plan 3
Exhibit
"F -4"
- Floor Plan 4
Exhibit
"F -5"
- Floor Plan 5
Exhibit
"G -I."
- Tentative Tract Map
Exhibit
"G-2"
- Tentative Tract Map
Exhibit
"G -3"
- Tentative Tract Map
Initial
Study
- Part I
ResolutiGr:: of
Approval
Conditions of
Approval
Plan
Enlargements
Elevations
Elevations
Part I
- Part II
- Part III
E.,
CI
SITIE UTMIY_ATCON MAP OWMl11 /DfVlLO�l11 •'�•• eMtlIM!!p
TRACT MID.IIS63
.......
our.c..r ewa ........... wv.. o. uuraww...
t
L.....�> • —y a -aj - "'i00TNILL 801
a� ._q �, •1 k
C-2,
wn;
z-1
TRAMT moo. iom =63
all _r 1
.. .0 c•c. o ••rc.• cruru.u• �^ � -) � r �8TY
crwr.. o. r.r .. u.rw.w. a.•w• u• uu.ewwrw, 1••-� 6 I j==--
O110ilCT bC61bMC�1 ilft J '_ i { {'i I�. \F
b!�1•YNae:H ¢�IJOO1Y.n i AMOCtAiM ! T 1 ���� Y.L�{ {{11
LCOAI nULCN1�4tONe � �Jbcr r1 r' ..,r_ .- ,t��:..
4 lffl
I_ _...._ _ � ..�14 •L,. `�.. �'� w rJ �1J (r r �11•_
-'..�� w w�l.. `� ti.__. rte-' y 71 rr e - - �I �I M..•....
r w- -a- —• A� r�� I �rA' B`- -[rtifl(1�4j+.�.I ({•�"
rat— S -•�- c,r,�•`
Tj-
__ice .V '"-Y r � .. ^' 1 ` t f, r} .• r w
rUL
�.�1`-��. I � '/" rT �1 fI'- I I-t ;% •✓ � \ ,�i'V'( 4 I ni .....
? .M 14 � � Irk•
Sf E DATA _- .._.. -. `�- �Y rte (�J��,`. -�•'� -yl. wi-
ant Cf .11 r- "L,•�'..' - I i.1,n� i G' � _ ,., i �' rt
E'.:C %ln�...`.:.'.': ". „,.'^ ^ °..... ......... ..... ._....�•.,�.c.. •` ��:�- •r[' • ��^- 'tom— �4��1� ,�
4:.
ti
D
PHASING PLAN •- r�-- ._._.��
TENTATIVE
IVE
"I'lGlACT' NOL a :SS3
ru c•r• sr eeYCYe cece aneen,
C III•. OV \I•e ee YYYY1•e \. \tYrY 1I CYYIIee 'A.
O��MN//611 /DryzLOPM.k_ —
pM61R!!N 11
a � IwPItlC •N�
I�F.11L bR1QIrTiONs � / L
PMCN MAN W _p II 11
C �
Tr �
F�
A It��_ �
0.11. IsJ It
1,•�_ A t
i
11
n.,
1 �1
q� 4
f�
CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN -
TENTATIVE
TRACT NO-11663
• C... .. . ..O . ..... <
c r o u. ........... .... or u... u.w...
OM'f[LVD4\'C19�1R
��gMppSCwAE NR�1l R'ECT
M l
W
iW.M
„'= 4�„��-�'^.? din- ';� =i-•� �,
3
L~w.- _ ✓ww.M .rwn. �Y.rt w1C +�- C1��.LLMM!�VYS �
/. •G�iy nraw...o .� •1 �. � +wr w-�-ry .,..r....e.: .�iw i
` w-,J NNw.� Lv-• v :+•r4.n0 F +rr _. v ••..
... N. wrwr.. mrrsr - r,.n,. .�•.......w r.e.•.l I
�� ��• � <I.H.14 O�y_.lO..r CI — .�.w12 �1::
art. ^_- •- �r -'..- ^+ _ _!� _Y�• -- ^.iwr rC' T I
_f
AQw :raw
n
��• � ' -an m..nri.
j e
= 'r6..Srs
I
or
c
I
17
*I
A
CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAP2%CLARGEME
TMTATIVM
.,;rF*ACT V40.11663`
........ ..... .. euo.uu.
LAN21reM AMCM"l=V
Lua—zg= -
3 del
00
hc
2 (11•,e)
,—. T-n Ala
7 j
� 4-p
AO
'�� uIIW1UFt �•' 1r�7,�I e •
GAS 'mil 7 1 � �' 4: � .'�1 •I• ��
T
�:__ ��� � � ,fir lutf..• a n. �''..,,,
A .Y
1 _
� ":S •rr� t'1
WIII
l
lay �, i •of ���' " ,- �sl � t
\, ,IC I•: , ,� ((('''���.+++i! �I n,.1-J —J 1'1 11 I �-
I' .L( 1 1_9 J J t • •` „
171 1 �L w II 1 � rs
" I •' � I �� � � � Imo. I ' D
IL
�1
1 .
t
T'.
•.
�
'
1
t
1
��I' I y
r r..
C ,
r
`I; I
A
�
1
�41iM
" I •' � I �� � � � Imo. I ' D
IL
�1
1 .
t
T'.
( 1
lls"
i,.
I
If
0
I
)
1L:1
�^II
V'r
5
)r
I'.
'1A
�r
r�
n_
i,.
0
)
x
Il
f1� VA
yn hl
I f - rl
i1
I
4
r 1Vy,
o'
f
I I
y `
t,
t•1,
1.
if 1
'I"
MIMI,
o
i ne
ir—``'�'� • v.. '` �� •� /� CI J S
. 5 ! I n •�tynhr... V l3
j � p� �I � •.p 1 h '9 o
I I�
I O �
I . w •1 I' 1�1 b
I W
(
w
3
41
Id
A VZAZ 0 -
�i'1
Ell
ei!ii
viv
I
2 ="
Fp
.y
� I Q
L�m
I
i I
. � I
Lyra$
Y 1
<r — l f
eJ •'� ' tj, l 1 . 1•
s
Y�F
Q 3
aLj-'
r
I
f
�
c �ti
f
;
�IeF;
6
0
v.
tip, rs.,.'7F
d
A
! y
to
gn
t
C
Y•c' >:i'L��P
!
�
iSL_5
y
=.
Y
V
s°
Y V
x
ilYl
I
2 ="
Fp
.y
� I Q
L�m
I
i I
. � I
Lyra$
Y 1
<r — l f
eJ •'� ' tj, l 1 . 1•
s
Y�F
Q 3
aLj-'
r
I
f
�
c �ti
c =[4
;
�IeF;
v.
tip, rs.,.'7F
d
A
! y
to
gn
t
C
Y•c' >:i'L��P
!
�
iSL_5
y
=.
Y
V
s°
Y V
I
2 ="
Fp
.y
� I Q
L�m
I
i I
. � I
Lyra$
Y 1
<r — l f
eJ •'� ' tj, l 1 . 1•
s
^I e
5 "
�n
I
3 of
Z 111
POP i E
�. j! I fie j in U C _Ir � '!1,S�d�1 J° .�•F•1 a L a n ¢
M < 99
lTr'
Q 3
Ir
�
f
�
^I e
5 "
�n
I
3 of
Z 111
POP i E
�. j! I fie j in U C _Ir � '!1,S�d�1 J° .�•F•1 a L a n ¢
M < 99
lTr'
Q 3
tip, rs.,.'7F
d
A
! y
C
Y•c' >:i'L��P
!
�
iSL_5
1 0 e +
Z
f7
1
u7�
+! fl
C3!,I
zz
IPZ
F_.
q_
tlpi�t
LU pppp��
-
0 o:
:-
l: ala- 11-C L449 W-
F�
I
�! I
I
7 "•I 1
J I • fl I i
, I
I
w
a
�a
6.
►.J
E
ElI
L
t , `• - R r
rw
it _L3
° - -- p
O i
rJ
_ .i �' !' � 14 00 1.�., P � -. ,, °' :nom •Y
t1
f y }� 1 �. 1 ...+' -^ it •-1f . 'J �"1.Y . � a .L:- t. \
r�
O C.p_L
J L'. 1 � •1
i;
e!
W
i:..:-
;-
Iq
"• • `Y
to
-
•
V
®
O
O _
V
1
V 1
t2
y
v
H„1
V
=
cc
W
1r[1�.
�
• I
•O
- V
i;
e!
i
3
fiAR
4r�j
t'7�7
;-
Q
"• • `Y
]iiiiii
7 v
1
i
3
fiAR
4r�j
t'7�7
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
INITIAL STUDY
PART I — PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET — T) be completed by applicant
Environmental Assessment Review Fee:, $90.00
For all projects requiring environmental review, this'
form must be completed and submitted to the Development
Review Committee *_hrougq the department wberr the
Project application made. Upon receipt of this
application, the environmental Analysis staff will prepare
Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review
Committee will meet and tare action no later than ten
(10) days before the public meeting at which time the
project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of
three determinations: 1) The project wile have no
environmental impact and a Negative Declarati.nn will be
filed, 2) The project will have an imvironnental impact
and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepar<a, or
3) An additional information report should be supplied
by the applicant giving further information concerning
the proposed project.
PROJECT TITLE: Tract 11663
APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Ma_ rlborough Development
Corporation, 2029 Century Park East Suite #1550, Lams Angeles, CA,
90067, (273)553-5131
NAME, ADDRESS,
TELEPHONE
OF PERSON
TO BE CON!rACTED
CONCERNING THIS
PROJECT:
Paul Byrnes
at Marlborough Development
Corporation, 2029
Century Park
East, Suite
_
#1550. :.os Anaeles• CA 9nn67_
VOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NCB.)
Assessor Panels 1677 - 331 -08, !077- 341 -02 E 1077- 631 -0"
LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STtsTE AND
FEDERAL AGENCIES AND TOE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS:
Building Permit from City of Rancho_ Cucamonga
Sewer and Water Permits from Cucamonga County W -ter District
- I -• I
E
4 ;
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
r]
DESCRIPTION IF PRO.TECT : Ter, at i ve Tract 11663 is a 413 -un it towr fihme
project on 39 acres on a cleared site. All utilities are immediately _
adjacent to the project. The project also contains recreation amenities
to provide internal sourze of recreation.
ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING &TD
PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 39 acres
DESCRIBE THr ENViR0NP1EVTAZ_SETTTNG OF THE PROJECT -j-'TE
INCLUDING INFORYA' 'IOIQ ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TRFES) ,
ANIMT,LS, ANY CUI.LTURAM, HISTORICAL OR SC A'IC ASPFCTS, USE
OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY
t::ISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS):
The site was formerly an orange -,rove tnat has been cleared for sever.l
ey ars._ A specimen pine tree was saved and will be incorporated into _
'the pr�4ct. There ore no cr +itural, historic or scenic aspects. The
site is surroundcd by multifamily and single family projects, except
for the school in the south.
is the project, part of a larger project, one of a serieej
of cumulative actions, which although individually small,',
may as a whole have significant environmental impact?
No
z- 2
� - "y'... -..- -rte... - •.- - ^- ---...
WILL MIS PPOjECT:
YES NO
X 1. Create a substantial change in g ground
contours?
X Z. Create a substantial. change in existing
noise or vibration? ,
X 3- Create a substantial change in demand for
municipal services (po)ice, fire, water,
sewage, etc.)?
X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or
general plan designations?
X 5: Remove any existing trees? How many?
X 6. Create the need for use or disposal )f
potentially hazardous materials s•ar_h as
toxic substances, flammable- or e:(,;-'osives?
Explanation of any YES answers above: _ Property wi i 1 be rezoned
widening- — -
IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of
residential units, complete the form on the
next page_
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished
above and in the r.ttachad exhibits present the data and
information required for this initial evaluation to the
best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and
information presented are true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief. I further understand that
additional information may be required to be submitted
before an adequate evallation can be made by the .Development
Review Committee.
Date_ /Z%2.9 /BCC
%3
Signat e
AM
Title Director of Planning & Enginearinc,
r
RESIDE11TIAL CONSTRUCTION
l
AOL
The folio-wing information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the
school district to accommodate the proposed residential development.
Tentative Tract 11663 .
Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Marlborough Development Corporation
Specific: Location of Project: East of Archibald. South of Church West of RamonaT�
North of Foothill.
PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PRASE 4 TOTAL
1. N inner of single
family units: See Attached Schedule
2. Number of multiple
family units:
3. Date proposed to
begir, construction: _
4. Earliest 'late of
occupancy:
Model
and u of Tentative
S. Dedroons Price Rance
1� 1
co
1 �
O
^�
N
M
�O
1
co
N
O
co
1 �
O
M
M QI
t
6Z
m Ot cm Ol m
O, a+ 0 m m
I , 1l: � c
W co /b C1 m
N
M
co
co
O
cn
cn
01
Oa%
\.
_
Ol
1
O1
OI
O1
W
CO
T
O
Z
T
N
�
O
Im
ice•
C'�
CO
Qti
Ol
•�
N N
10 -
4- 7
1
C.O
u
Ip ti
H
O
O
O u
i) C
E
O
I
L
N rtl
CC
s
F-'
L�
W
Z
O
N N N
D
W
W
d •r
Z
O
W
.n
C
Cl
N
ID
Cl
uj
1 1
b
Q
2^
137
L
'o 0� 1
1
V-
0.
C
0-0
.— N M
M
M QI
t
6Z
m Ot cm Ol m
O, a+ 0 m m
I , 1l: � c
W co /b C1 m
c
O
.1
N
co
co
OOi
cn
cn
OOl
Oa%
\.
_
Ol
O�
O1
OI
O1
W
cv
= N
T
N
to
N
Im
ice•
C'�
CO
Qti
Ol
c
O
.1
N
co
CO
Ol
T
O1
Ol
O1
\.
_
Ol
O�
O1
OI
O1
N
W
= N
1,
O
m
O
In
1�
q
CO
CI
Ol
c
O
.1
N
co
co
ON
O^
O1
M
OOi
\.
_
cn
mMcl
T
Ol
<71
W
N
= N
N
LO
m
m
O
1-I
1%-
co
CO
Of
c
O
.1
N
co
6b
OON
cn
QI
�
cn
\.
_
T
O1
T
Ol
m
N
CO
= N
N
LO
m
m
O
I`
r\
1`
co
cn
c
O
.1
N
co
Ol
O1
Ol
m
Q1
\
\
(n
cn
m
O)
471
CO
N
= N
C0
N
tp
N
10
•NI
0-1
c
O
.1
1
n•.
!A
Q
J
J
M 2
� O
—SOW
I•- m C7
V J M
1' N
H �
11
El
N
4- U
O
O
Of .-
= N
TJ
C1
4p
•NI
J
•�
N N
10 -
4- 7
1
C.O
u
Ip ti
O
O
O u
i) C
E
I
L
N rtl
m O
L�
CL C
CI O_
O
N N N
M M
W
d •r
.a
C
E R
N
I 1 1
1 1
40 V
L
'o 0� 1
V-
0.
t o O
0-0
.— N M
sp• In
D.
Z-
1
n•.
!A
Q
J
J
M 2
� O
—SOW
I•- m C7
V J M
1' N
H �
11
El
E
u
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT NO. 80 -12 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN
THE ZONING FROM R -2 TO R -2 /RD FOR 40 ACRES
LOCATED BETWEEN ARCHIBALD AND RAMONA AVENUES
SOUTH OF CHURCH STREET - APN 1077 - 341 -01,
1077 - 133 -08, 1077 - 631 -03
WHEREAS, on the 31st day of December, 1980, an application was
filed and accepted on the above described project; and
WHEREAS, on the ]Ott, day of June, 1981, the Planning Commission
held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the
California Government Code.
SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made
the following— fl gs:
1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted
in the proposed zone in terms of access, size, and compatibility
with existing land use in the surrounding area;
2. The Proposed Planned Development would not have significant
impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties;
and
3. That the proposed Planned Development is in conformance
with the existing and proposed General Plan.
SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found
that this project w 1 not creete a significant adverse impact on the
environment znd recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on
June 10, 1981.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. That pursuant to Sect•lon 65850 to 65855 of the California
Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City
of Rancho Cucan,anga hereby recommends approval on the
10th day of June, 1981 ,Planned Development No. 80 -12.
2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City
Council approve and adopt Planned Development No. 80 -12.
3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related
material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall
be forwarded to the City Council.
4. All Conditions of Approval applicable to Tentative Tract
No. 11663 shall apply to Planned Development No. 80 -12.
IN
7.7
El
LJ
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY
APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 11663
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 11663, hereinafter "Map"
submitted by Marlborough Development, applicant, for the purpose of
subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a subdivision
for a total development of 413 townhouses on 40 acres in the R -2 zone,
located on the east side of Archibald, on the south side of Church, west
side of Ramona - APN 1077- 133 -08, and 1077- 631 -03 into 437 lots, regularly
came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on
June 10, 1981, and
WHEREAS, the City Planner
subject to all conditions set forth
Divisions reports; and
has recommended approval of the Map
in the Engineering and Planning
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the
Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other
evidence presented at the public hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga does resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings
in regard to Tentative Tract No. 11663 and the Map thereof:
(a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable
interim and proposed general and specific plans;
(b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is
consistent with all applicable interim and proposed
general and specific plans;
(c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development
proposed;
(d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause
substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to
humans and wildlife or their habitat;
(e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public
health problems;
(f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with
any easement acquired by the public at large, now of
record, for access through or use of the property within
the proposed subdivision.
Resollitior No.
Page 2
(g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the
environment and a Negative Declaration is issued.
SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 11663, a copy of which is
attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following
conditions and the attached Standard Conditions:
PLANNING DIVISION:
1. Site and landscape Plans shall be revised to accommodate
a minimum 10' wide landscape buffer along the westerly
boundaries of the project adjacent to existing school
and apartment complex. Such revisions shall be subject
to approval by both the City Planner and the Foothill
Fire District, prior to final map recordation.
2. A continuous looped pedestrian walkway shall be provided
along all interior boundaries of the project.
3. Three permanent children play areas shall be incorporated
into the design of the project. Precise location of such
facilities shall be subject to approval by the City Planner
prior to final map recordation.
4. The temporary retention basin /play area shall be fenced
with a 5' high wrought iron fencing, and its periphery
shall be heavily landscaped. A lawn or other appropriate
ground cover shall be installed and maintained within the
fenced area.
5. The design and intensity of architectural detailing of
all structures and patio walls shall be in substantial
compliance with submitted elevations.
6. CC &R's for this project shall be subject to approval
by the City Planner prior to recordation.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
1. A soils and geological study regarding the effect of
ground saturation due to the storm retention basin
on the foundation of the existing adjacent house
and any suggested mitigating measures shall be submitted
to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to
recordation of the map.
E
11
ICJ
Resolution No.
Page 3
El
2. An on -site and off -site drainage study for the project
shall be provided to the City Engineer for review prior
to recordation of the map. After review of the study,
the City Engineer reserves the right to determine requirements
of construction, reconstruction or alteration of on -site
storm drainage system to his satisfaction.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 1981.
PLANNING COYIMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Richard Dahl, Chairman
ATTEST:
Secretary vf the Planning Commission
I, JACK, LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that t:;e foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a, a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 10th day of June, 1981 by the following vote to-
wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
r; •1
LJ
v
O
HQ"^
PTV
Y
J A
LNNNL
N
Lw
o
^
N
Py Y r
T �
._
L w o
V N
I
U
V
O N
O
L V
N
��
LOL
yVT.•A.C`•
Y
V •Vi 4
b J
%rn
}Y
V O
"•
d
GL
y
GLO
cni
y
en
Z
wPC ?PO
b
N
ii f•6
u
A C A A N
j
b
u.•.^
V
N
Pliwbb
y
q
OTV
Ot
`
V
•O.
^
C4
L
qa
T
In O
L
�I1 •�
N
u d L
n6
C •
M
LC^
r .
V
�
�.
W n
N
L•
Gq
O
�
r .• n
J
G
V LN
O`
y
V•
O
qqI
n
1•'rf�
ba`
-,G
„6
bG
buVE
iti
.'°I
6
V
b✓f
yG.
NC
N^
•-•
qY
bT
V
Y
LN
V
>
M�
^ W
q C.
^ y
W q O
EL u
L O W C W
N
V V q u
G
�
iE
• d
}t
q G
l
1
•LV'
�Q• -V L
O•
b
�
EI
�
W
W
�
�
O
u
L
•� m
N O
_
.p
_^ N
.(p.
N G�
V
6
W. � A L
N
V
S
N
^ V
C
�
>
Y L w N
a
y
n C •� p.
Y
V p
N4
YV
N
6
y
CuOd
_
.�
C
1'b
I�
L
qr
n
y
.In "L
9
" L
y
d L
y
D V
J L
•J
NIA
$
Y^
O.
6? N r
nNtr
tj N
N '•
NOA
q
L
V
nA
4N
CV
VO
Y
W
T 6
LOY�
vn
qV
1
qV
lw
u.•'•
CV
7N
N9
dv
e r
bY.
^O
yN
gViO
Cp
u
•p'
Wa
•NniO
N
nu
�b
Yil
Jd
MM
Y
x
�GyW
AS
C t
V�
~LrLV
�
AT
•9 J
«�G
•Gr
y
Z
V p
qy
rAO
a V .N
�•�
•-O.
NG+
b
Y
r �
('�
C •L d'
C
Y
� r
rnJ
a
W
W•O.•N�
q
.p
uJ.ibJ
M
N�
u
O.
Sr
pS
b
tj
n
bNV•
WTY
lltL
lu ai n
�]�l
W
CM
VO-
N T
O
d Y
�
g V N
b
L
a
a
L
1�VV
U
L('n
OOl1
n•
dV
r.
(' L
>
nV
��
qw
Cb
A�
N
LO
N
j
n'Gyy��V•
L
V.
NlL
Lr `V
Wu�V >�.i
C
q
V
O t
q
dY
V ••
.�LY.G
C
n
V
L
b\.
•. G
p.0
11
V
N
y N O
b
d
d u S V 6 q
N'
L
r
b
N d
a
N•^
U
N
W
nI!
N
Y
y!J
r
A•�
q i T q•^
I']
y
n
Lpy
M
L O•
1]�CO
T•u
_ CC V•
L
y�
n€
�r
•
yr
OC
N
OC
nVVrgV
YO..
•.•N
TT
V�
qW
CT
^•00V•
�
wLiS
V>
/fA
NV;
ur•
U
O
rV
CJ
C/�y'
��
iu
T
c
yy
•L.+ `
4b �g
�o,�
ONU
�b•^py
noo
Nn6
pT
yb
�,w
d•V
T
�G
.OjV` O
hL
J
N
q V V^
V
n
C
y
•fV.
V q
d
C
q w 6 N f u
A�
��
W
O
i O
L
PM
r y_ •3
S p
V u
NLN
q q
rb
ANq
V
r•�
L u
Nu
Y ... N
NV
N w
QW
Nn
4q
C
VOIO
l•I
Qw
Ld y
Wy LS
P O
[.
yp yO
l�
lV
y L
V
Y O •” q
HL
Vfw
JMMAaL
�O'
W
vfy
V
u uV• L
d G
L V
y
G V
O
N L W
�YI
W
4N
eR
N
O
Y
Y
r
x
O
x
6
C.
a
H
O
V
K
a
•• C C
u A O
d L V
a 6 Y
N 6 1
q
O
L
n
w
O
V
0
V
L
w
d
L
V
S
M
H
w
O
HQ"^
PTV
Y
J A
LNNNL
^
N
Py Y r
T �
L w o
V N
r q
O N
LOL
yVT.•A.C`•
}4�G
O V W
b J
%rn
}Y
pAC
N
ou�aw
GL
y
GLO
cni
y
en
Z
wPC ?PO
�C
N
ii f•6
u
A C A A N
A O
e
N
b
l�.�
O V
"�OUti•p
iY
V
OTV
Ot
V
•O.
^
C4
L
qa
T
In O
L
�I1 •�
N
u d L
n6
C •
+J
LC^
S
V
J
v
y
O q •ti W
WN
A
ba`
-,G
bG
buVE
iti
.'°I
6
V~
Y
�n
O2I.r
LNU in�L
N^
•-•
qY
bT
V
Y
LN
V
Y y
M�
^ W
q C.
^ y
W q O
EL u
L O W C W
N
a L O•
G
�
iE
• d
}t
q G
l
1
•LV'
b
V
EI
't,
^Pr.6
C'O r10
q
�
5
_
9
_^ N
N •
N O� d u�
V
6
V
V •. . o
N C`„
�
N
W
V[;w
N n
V �p C
L
1 -LVauN
Y
QO
6
a0
6
y
W
_
.�
L
p/
I�
L
W
m
^
T �
GLO
cni
y
v
Z
�C
V
C4
L
qa
T
yY
('�
C •
+J
LC^
l
WN
�
L ^q'
LL
6
V~
Y
`
q
„N
q'•�N
CV
•W
qY
bT
V
Y
LN
V
W
M�
^ W
q C.
�
W q O
4
n
q
a L O•
pG
�
iE
• d
r
q L
q G
l
•LV'
b
5
_
_
_^ N
iE
L
Y
u rG-
W
V �p C
V
•- W
6
y
.�
L
p/
I�
L
W
VT
WN
Y^
yC
A'^
L
Ow
V
nA
4N
CV
VO
p •
wN
Lwb
LOY�
vn
qV
1
qV
lw
u.•'•
CV
7N
N9
dv
e r
bY.
^O
yN
gViO
Cp
u
c02
Wa
•NniO
N
�
'-C
MM
GO
^P
11d
WN
tl
AS
C t
V�
��J
d'
b a•
?N
a V
•9 J
«�G
•Gr
V01
qr
Z
V p
qy
rAO
a V .N
ryO
�Ctf
NG+
b
Y
r �
('�
C •L d'
V
Y
� r
a
b J
'J + C
U
O.
Sr
VG
�J^
d••V•
Vl"
bNV•
WTY
N�
GN •CV.
Y
�]�l
W
CM
Vr
�NOV
VnT�
O
y^
rY
�
WC
'V
r6
F�
NC
U
L('n
OOl1
O
dV
r.
(' L
Vb
�
Ov0
aN
L�r
•qb
V
O G
^qq`
^O
b\.
6
9 P O
11
V
N
b
d
c W
W u G
q
r
a
n
qn
q
C
OC
^N
rJn
TT
�W
qW
CT
^•00V•
>•O
N
T
c
yy
u�L
�o,�
r
fia
noo
I'o
Po
ViC�
��
LN6
YO
NLN
^�
ANq
1.6
cO V
0;; 0
N
N� P
L' L
P O
q
l�
V
Y O •” q
b rn
^ L
V
u uV• L
d G
L V
y
G V
O
N L W
W
b=
p
6
O N
p
C{(I
p
VN
`n
+. •..•
b4ry
bVC
�"�
<L
bqc
'-GM
}u
L1`V
VY
wVV
u r
nN
CC�
[emu
[_W
NJO
W
N
j.
�1
O A S
C�
n•.
p W c_
^G�•b
O
L
•• Z
FN
N�
D: �
VrY
1-4:
FYN
QV
DLO.
^N
}
•C ••G.q
6uV
VLVJ
QON N
CVO•
F•L.�L
L.
O
�
�
CI
PI
OI
q. W
N
1
�
•
•
�
�
Y
t
`
O
N N
A
q_
S PLn
O V n
R V C
N q
_ N
` C
N A
LSO
4 J P
_2 L
Y' L C
✓ R
L
u h
C A
o L >
C+ O
n
yy. D R
V � q
_ p
CN✓J
w N a
N�a
0
N
Z
N
w
W
Y
P.
A
v
w
.L,
d
q
k
S
�6
D
V
a
O
n
u
d
e
q
y6
W
d
v
O
l
r. w
e �
G w
O
L
L o
C �
n Y
L b
A C
n
V
c u
q V
b q
CI O
c ✓
V
.W-
LN
v .�
c
v L
9
R V
a ` ✓
q W
CT ✓ �
N A O
way
y C
V S
A
C4a-�
PO �
LNd
W O.r
d
N V
C q
V U
N
Y V•
Lei
C
q N•
�i
•i L
O:q
C Q P
� � O
Fa
v
} N
q M
a raJ
d � �
P
AVM
q PC
Ham
C CEW
r, c
uic
M �
G
d
n
a
al
L
a
u
P
4
Y/
Fj.
S
N
L
V
u
W
C
O
6
Dq
L
J
r' 6
n
q
E
L
V q
V W
E L N
C`VL
- V
a C M
o`w
la^ °
C
� V
F,;aN
�m-
O
irM
i
L
V Cl O
NCL
N C
L a 4
WAN
E C •-
aLo
f0]LL
v c
can.
P�
T«�
6 L D
�J
d
•LnL
O
✓ Y
V C
V J
r
N L
- i
.L•r q
« L
L 6
Lq
^E
�N
C d
.N- >
u L
Ly
w
F L
LpP 4°•
O^ N
ON
Noo
C C C
LqT
J
C 6 m
N
0
p
A
a
r
a
rn
C
Y
l
q
O
N
m
°
-C
« O
qw«
L«
L O
4
Y- N
O C
aqL
O O
Na
CJ L
✓
'a
V
L L
N✓
N N
om
Vi
o v
E c
L J
N a
a�
vN
N cL
r0 L
C O O
N N
>dN
V uN
dni
c
F
L
yN
C
O�P
r
°Y C
Nty
q Cr R
ORY
bN�
U
•d 0.°i
L V
O • vVi
L.•. u N
WNr
�sE
n P
` c
F.agr
� n u
V Pn4
.i.GO
q
« l N V
4 L T h
doa}
t E d O
u
Pqd 6
C
v
(LE q+
'Q nw
O
u
N
n b
° °L
✓d
L
«
W O i� n
Y
O
V L N^
u
q n
L
L
N C
M .0
{V{JJ L « n
p Z
N'^
L•GLJ/s
_
4
YV
6 uCYUOyw.L
N V
C_
.� N
u
L
V Y �•r V'
I
y
U u
O
L
•O V
C
V N
« un u? q V l O� � q
4.SU^ CCV VO
Lp
yN. L.
O
C.n
V y
l•.0
L.
oc
�
°�
tJ
'yro,'y o.� Nvvu c•«
.°..
ftL
lW
O O u
O4
9dJ el m N}GC
C L
L E
J O
L J
c✓o
v
wN
cnY.� x ✓[" rue C<1C
oL ° c cv u.l •^
10
L L •i ✓ d q
��I••••,
••
•
V
i• W
«["
YL •
•fl J4 i LyJi .r'L'O ✓L.r
q�T
L
4r0-
i NN D LO V4
i w�
JY`
n'
6
N X N W
_
Y. C
�
O q
.. �
L W
L
P �✓ 1
L
' n Cu O'.V. O.•••
C
^LC
LY-Y
W•-
L �✓V C O•(c -,WiaL TO
TV
1'
•
&0,
O, ryCry Ly V
L
N
N
*
NyN. A !' 1y404V q
CN O
y°
V[{+«•
•°-L~•
4 NN} N b� g4nTUw•pG
y�
rJ « P_ pvY
V O
N
•- U J W P A C a L t
N O
a n
L.
O
FTT
N
Vi
✓
H•n
30
O O
1"'X✓
!^4N
NO 6D.. -V X_NO ILY
U
W
E
•� o
Y
° � > p o � v
pN
L
pW
[1LWO
C
•.O
�4L-�NW �L q8_ ^
4
` V_L
N.pG
•�
C .11Oq O:dn h`+•
D Ra
N
f!G 6L NG
i' ~ A
_ V O
q C •-
NY/
~
V NR�V_ r R« .•QL
° !! N
O N
Vy
_ q
N.^L MC4
~O: h'
N M1
P L d R V 9 U
T✓nN✓JWVC CJO
F V
FC
6.G }i •-
N R
L. C
•-
C L
> r X N R O l 01 W V A d Y
V. V L a
u pl
O.
l C V O
N J [: rr •••
W°
D C
X O.
O L
V � V 4 h c• C
L 1 y• V W O O •- L + T n
V
� GOA L
y O
•-
M T[' Ea•�M_� Nq
v e p
.N Wno
n
o
C W YJ N q �• Y L i V V N L O
q u 'd o.- L- a •^o
`v
G^
� q .°• < W N
u T
� K
T q� } .L.. d R d � J .L•• w0. q Y
j
L p W+•
L
V V PO L' 1!M 4. P✓
W •�
o
o.
vc • -ai.NC
ao
aMirP
qC�P
a'..i
AN4
CN
dL .L-(�J
� y._q.
i- CVJA nW•^ _ 6 N
d
M •u .r C
_ N O
„
N J O O'C L. q Y:
R
�p .n °�
c.Nr:
wqu :+ ✓.-u
.N•.�m
�✓
dL4 °`or Puy On.L
4••L^COCUTpu �qw
r°�
acv °b
n� }m
L'}L}•.
dD
¢c
°D. c °N'
nL
w
ere
u7i
YN
Ncw.�PPt u« uc� m°
o«
„�vNJ'.
mrn
L o
�v
n ...•q o� cY u N L
E
Fnv
v rmi
rncmi
Na
la - �i'�d ci ��` V d Eru
C �W✓
vri
LRV. d
•JV«
ry
r r-iiJ .•mac c
R bC+
LV
AL ¢�O
S+NO
^.-NN
O.«
O
N VV.- ✓.�rCiw q�
a L NG q «r
i
u� -o
N a ci. o.. -.+ n a q^
G N CD
•ci.=
P4 LVV 6
S
li��K
'n L•^
NV yb ..- .c
aN✓ u „V` 14 „i
liar >
}WgVC
_ X Ei Nun C
•� O_ _ °
` A b:
yNI
u Y N •- < C ^ W y ••J C W
.1 L
_ L
_ G N C q L L' V
V C]
L ` C
«'m
L .•C. .^ [•1
AT
N} «nOL
AL N•
•n
y
n Z ML �4q« «P UON ."Y
iC
'
N N« V Gl
d W ✓ <I ✓
u rJ
^ 9 N
.M
. [r � C
> .^
C .•. •- l:: •� O v: y V✓
V � 4 N L C C L .
.- C
W TAD « •�
N j.• C
4 P
lJ
4 N S V 1• � J` C N q� T
p
M
4 G
` L_ V V� A N C
:C •� C
W N
N: fj
•-6
Cn
[•CN
^� ^XN`
N
«CO✓
D •
C
C 04 C- '�Vm
^C • -M+• Nq d LA.0 -Y L.••
c.
uEl
^M rani
c_�u
O N «-. a..:u� o•qE e.q
N
V
N N [L1 q !i ✓
W O `
^
t'
q C .• ` Y .� 7 Y L «
-• M ^ g ,l'.
h
•• Y p l l •J •r
« V J
N^
l L L n C T � G "•- e�
C
4a
W W V O'•«« O
V. qV N
C O•
RV R PRN N t;� 0a C(: p6 �
LDI
�
�
�
�
9I
1
♦ 1_
u
N
Q
W
L
0
N L • r
H N q P Y ... r ✓ C J
4 A a O T m 4
E
L'' ^E � O cdV • O CC WbO� ply F �_
L _V 6 •O P J •L.. U ry Pr � N 4 ` u y y{ .^ P A j a N L'
.] J N d i _ 1G ^ A � p N E d Y C C Y S O •.. u « � N •'- U
L - .r.r dP i•,r RuO.V Y ✓ .may � - ✓ ?Iq
V V i, C ° V •. O N � W w L N y 1. N >. L � v N ^ 0. y0. !, � L W
u•J N wW AC yN ^ qL • -d-CO O' qU WOV ^L W ` `M N V � `✓
u PY ...r d V O� !J N � O 2 � u O.O LI O' O � !.• L N V v l � ✓ E V �� ° V
m
J �•C^.Wi SVOi Orb ..O
Y +! t �N nNL Ti CTt,N C,�W t. �..• �rV w.NO` T. W {- •I� 7C
y'Ld Oi V6 TOyi u NV> C�V, v. -4. ^N� ESN ut COL Z uNy T � �V
�1 ` a
f. P �1 Cpp'' � a P C LI L [Y, N C O r p •Q R W^ W L L u .u1� � .�
�p L W Wr T 'y^ d JLY LuA 'Op L P` N} A } T W ^• iy � La• Y u N WL6
Ou` VN uY .. rWOtl4 °lP L�R�+� LNy ENO ^E ` yL V V r Vm
m W C W ^ P > L Y O' d uqi Vs O T G L N >. �« H r✓ C p .j V J L u u y O y C E
V V } O dC•_. d N ^ _.°. iNA •O.rN CL'LLq 0. G � PA
WC'NY n Y i1Cq 4N9 NN4Ln AOO � uN K qF L L L NNY
LNq Vpl dT ✓WP L dNG .-mi yy �Orn LV �9 Y'� \° e� rn m ci=
^ _ AT Wu W ^� � anJ U'O L••.�•.L. LnL dOUOd '^ IT WA
1naN GV A� O09 O 'r ..W.LO nd✓P^ AO nLLTO✓ .. .0 �^ ^ Oo4 L n°C °CL,
2:3
aNG Lfi 4wf yyi Y. r Goy Oqu 1`V •N nIA V1.0 O NN..C.0 O �U i 4YW. .Wr t0 n[
T L d` O _ A L- V Yi N L V L W T 1: N^ f' O •� Y. •"' N R U
pq\r .LW TYVO.L_ V.rO OVI V.Ci�LAPA LN ✓ OpVU P •O OV
u N V_ ^ W r� A C ..0. u p m u W= E L 'G Y. u N a: K Z O ....^ ..� 4 •1�
p d TC. .r N N..0 pCp��OY Yp4L V V O. W d u ✓u � ^Ti]
q a.Nn r °a✓ IccN d0y ✓° _m -°-.LO
�° L•im
VVL^ Lw JinJ N ..Y. RL..
N S L
nYgC ^� �(/•L" 6NL L LIYYN- WY✓ Nt �Jr1^y. .' 0.}O Yl .Oi�L' W 1J lW.)d � d O NVL
n7i V.�•� L 4.J p00 �N� C Bpi Lq COd Cu` >W V V w r Y
W. 6p ✓' R u ✓ W O E L} n S^ -0 � N° W E 1L. S N' ^ C ^ •' C C'O
C q .-
C W P i L� N_ •}� � „ C„ { 'O p .^ 4 y ° u Y. i P J n A 1'• q q •. � � ^
\rVa� °.0 aNi✓ PfG }n =y `Vp wdi �..C. t._ O1mL O°'V ( ^.yam U 7 A N L W NLi
O L •. y,-O. � O L .^ L N ft 4 V N W O W d N
y ^ O d •� yl N N O L �^ G � •^ C p f, n
P�� P q N N LT✓ L°U N._ C PVC L r� ••
PC_ .nO VS GPw 0.L tl CC.LLUU .COL^ OL .�-„• Q ytC p L Vi �'qL
+C•V.�d .^N � 4r> V NOY QVL OJ�tiR tL A. •••Y WNL O � A ✓� n OV yY4
N [: O L• 6 N U= O M
r 3 •-°
x
N _
N n
._. O C •_ O N n O C ✓ 7 G p
CFO «a� L Kr]i .rn � vT c a'W'p rTa. L o
=4 bu w_L..°_ - c °✓ ae.= ° uv.N,. vT. o. i. .^-nJ vv= `c
y�4ronaJ, w•'O QUy NGW ro�T Pl4.r _q'J '� ^L ^N i^ a .`•L V V
✓ ^ k 0 d V Y yE+ t LL' S 4 P V C VT1 • L 0. N N O d• L d
N Y G O ✓/ •> . V W V V b ^` O y 4 d N_- O_ ✓_ nJ 4 P L N P p U a
V A✓ (: G g A r i. G ° C n O r W L O .n. Y� ✓� L. ✓ p CI N A V A y fC. ^' L'' '•' �, V V
`` ^QLA nOY %` SN]G =„ VPL Y. OV•\r" J «fl YA�4d p..V. •L✓ ° •gip y AO.
o ' Q�.p ^C WAN 4.NpV ?W {d ^Y aL• CVV W V ^V.r^r y O1N ^ ^ C
VyU} S`•O{ °N OAJ O «Y N6 pN `[ d '^ E O
L y L •^ u L �. j O V A N � ~ U W W N qT. O !P O d T,(` ..V. ✓ V_ p E P G r 7
•WAL �VUC IC ✓La VYY OIW SL .O� w NW O +' LN Lti _`
¢�- aN� ✓C ✓ °0. N °C �uq l W y ^v QUO L ✓..WNC Gu dW P CI q •°r^ V.°- y`
L C' u L ^ N .'n � u V A p d O � U ^.•' N W P q-� W A A W` P � « } N W W u pp
YAC, ^V.N+G.L^ N2 •- ..T.TY ONW a•.L.0 L�LLLN Iu. .�C p L NU VY.. � F:�
+aNO RI'.WnNq uGd qq.•G. NbC OW pCI .•0..��1W 007.•• ^ i WC VO Y� L
u`.
N. V S 4� T u{ c W W y N C N L` ✓ N n y. ._ E A
�Yd V•^V4 N°>; Tc�a. Ate.°.° K .°:. ^°' .°.J ^� F °i «LLiy E ° «LLi r p° pLGY� 6° Cu
w-�" ) ^. °'.`. p•rV .nc L.°. ° Nnq NNN iN�\:N ryrngw >. i �E " "N `•. t°v
O G .0 •+ O C V N L U U a A L. L OI ..N.', n V r ^ P'^ 2.2 L L c u✓• W J n p N P
d
A l✓ C .4- K N � u •T•i u j O E P « C W O = u O V fi L T a�^ V^ ^ d. � 6 r J u« W L .I [F u L
pO�u N.N.n 6m�0 C <I�S ON•n O PON 1A ?q^.� O Ap L W✓ •�J
O cuiry L T +u N_d F2S YcN CVV.r Yu•Ni .+a a ud L LI 'L^• v0
WC. OCO.O. .Od �p....L ✓A `O `'] >.VN ^W^ A N TY Way n C •C O_ d.r
L u W �� L C u u V (j O t O N O 2• V ^ L. .... V d O rq ♦ ~ G y l^ •. ✓ p � L y.
u N ✓} K A„ .� S u' Y�{ V m ^ N O U T F� � u W � u T � I Z` ^.°r N
Y L° T V y S] O: O p L � C O n� m� N Y=• A ^. ^- L y u R N •^ L V N N N 1/TI f• ` ,n L V N V C p L
N � �
E6y�.r N.Or�Lp.SF NWUU� NLCi F ✓C.^W N•,V \C.l .�+O b..N +L W..• N NO ..•uo N Nu
6 O'er ^ ... R 6 J y'�'•- N O
NO NO'�K ]:✓ V LLR .ru h"yW OL•yN uL PLC ^ �u t
g C L N� L O T A A C E 6 d > � � �. �• N V A d N V U IC u u y✓ C V/ l C d °� q O P O] „ Z
u .°V u L u� D A W N �. •q. q u j1 N � L L 0. U �a d N � W ti O M^ •4.• L u a {� ✓ P N l,T � ` T Y N i y l P W OI �
r�V ^GVdN ✓L yO ^CYO '^(INb J W.I N�OL O ^6N OYN ^ L ^.OV V.K N ^O VN.0 1 nV V.O. `n'
60N YLJJM Ly VLI 1.^LU CVi:C S 1. L•�^ •LNV•` •' ^T +OTT ^4 y WI" .. PN �I >N Nn
> HLJ« '• ^ [.Jq4. 4 LCNOry iW WL FU• \yC t OL .-C
yl \L �b GO 60pLV N �y i[ >O O•y WMOi WV
~ m P
W
Li
r
C
q
Or
C
O
4 `
u �
i�
i
O
C�
uV
W
w
C '
V
w �
W N
G w
w V N
m
N
�PV
O q
+RT
bWb
O
� ` V
b
•C b G
M O N
_4N
^ C R
r �
W W
• u a-
P o
O.L N
N C.
b O
C
p � N
6 P Y
Li L
O.V R
N V N
oq
J �
O
i <+
La
v N
O
q
F 2
Y J
V L
0 N
O U+
4+
O L
O N
p }
C O
O O
C N
A ?
ar a
c �
W L
CuY
l bF
l u 1-
VO�
Q O.N
O
�L
O q
+J u
c. C
W q
G rq
w G
V L.
N �
L u
V- rr
O.
'O L
u
W
L Y
n•' Or
L ~
W
C W
N q
— q
O �
O. l
✓ V
W
V
b L
� n
W
r
T
?W
1_
^
N \.
C
�
O
YI
u uj CI
p
M
`
04
^
N
J p
W y
2 M
•^
L
W N F
r
N
p
S!
N6
C
r
.LAIL
L
A O
L
W d
y
W
L C
P
p
qV0
Ur 1
^ m
L V
r6
d Y
L
O
q
p
.rr p
i W
+t
O O
+�
O
4
_ba
L N W
O'
C •
N
W
rn V u
L°
y N
O
b
t
4J l
W
.r
N
N
�qV
W
R
yP
r
b
O
V
cq
N W
G
LO.
o
u l
wR
mo
a
y
c. o
a
V
U
Y d
V4r C
V
V
7
L V
6
J N
c
c'vr2
w°.a
c
p
9 f
o n
u4
•- c
W
i
y
r
l Y
y
O Y•
rar
N V
Y
a�q
V` C
N°
Y
y
n
Nc
G
V
J L
rtY1C
N L
tip'
J .y
V
P
CW«•
T.^q^
aIUP
l6.-•
JSWI
N
C w
^ b
O.
A E
uu
O )
4C
N
G`
u p u W
bN0 q
^
U �_
V-
sir
NW
O
V
W L
N s
Y O
�
A
O
u—
T q
V r-•
— N
CO
W I
M C
^0
ryL
V.
w p
q
�N
PrgirlL
N
V
�~
d
TV
c
C u
PN or
6m
N
N
W C
CNyN
Y
to
L p-
L V � J L
q=
.[
Vr••
yJ
36
VO
4�Q )U
F
f^O
Ht
O
l•
q
A M
N L
M
ar
P
W O
L N
q
F
+!
L
!
On
(L
GO
LTW
rL
7
a�
�—
U
b pr �
Y
••C.
r
C
q
Or
C
O
4 `
u �
i�
i
O
C�
uV
W
w
C '
V
w �
W N
G w
w V N
m
N
�PV
O q
+RT
bWb
O
� ` V
b
•C b G
M O N
_4N
^ C R
r �
W W
• u a-
P o
O.L N
N C.
b O
C
p � N
6 P Y
Li L
O.V R
N V N
oq
J �
O
i <+
La
v N
O
q
F 2
Y J
V L
0 N
O U+
4+
O L
O N
p }
C O
O O
C N
A ?
ar a
c �
W L
CuY
l bF
l u 1-
VO�
Q O.N
O
�L
O q
+J u
c. C
W q
G rq
w G
V L.
N �
L u
V- rr
O.
'O L
u
W
L Y
n•' Or
L ~
W
C W
N q
— q
O �
O. l
✓ V
W
V
b L
� n
W
r
T
?W
1_
^
u i
C
�
O
v
� C
p
M
`
04
^
r"
v
W y
M
psi
p
d
O_
W
N6
C
r
N
L
A O
L
W d
y
W
L C
P
p
qV0
Ur 1
^ m
No
d Y
G
O
•�
N
i W
+�
b
4
_ba
rOy
O'
Y
N
Vr
W 4
L°
b
cb
qc
W
y`
•Y
o N
OIL
}^
W
R
r- 4
3
V O
cq
.�'
W �n
v ar
wR
mo
WLL�q
.V
O
U
Y d
V4r C
V
b N 4
7
N
Jm
LLpO
u�^
b
p
9 f
o n
u4
•- c
W
i
OC
r
V �V li
y
C�`��
p N C
V` C
. T L O
Y
.OL.
✓
n
Nc
G
V
J L
rtY1C
N L
tip'
J .y
V
P
CW«•
T.^q^
aIUP
l6.-•
JSWI
N
C w
^ b
d q
aL•a
uu
O )
4C
Y
nV
l
bN0 q
•r0.
U �_
V-
sir
NW
O
V
W L
N s
Y O
�
s
O
L^
0
.n¢
W
C
6UL
L
CO
W I
O
^0
ryL
u}
w p
L
VGN�u
q••-
vi J'"cV
-�
.i
c
C u
PN or
V V
wa
c �
�. �t°rau
L p-
L V � J L
.[
Vr••
yJ
N
Iq
F
p�yN�
Ht
O
l•
d dGV
A M
N L
M
ar
P
W O
L N
p
F
r
C
q
Or
C
O
4 `
u �
i�
i
O
C�
uV
W
w
C '
V
w �
W N
G w
w V N
m
N
�PV
O q
+RT
bWb
O
� ` V
b
•C b G
M O N
_4N
^ C R
r �
W W
• u a-
P o
O.L N
N C.
b O
C
p � N
6 P Y
Li L
O.V R
N V N
oq
J �
O
i <+
La
v N
O
q
F 2
Y J
V L
0 N
O U+
4+
O L
O N
p }
C O
O O
C N
A ?
ar a
c �
W L
CuY
l bF
l u 1-
VO�
Q O.N
O
�L
O q
+J u
c. C
W q
G rq
w G
V L.
N �
L u
V- rr
O.
'O L
u
W
L Y
n•' Or
L ~
W
C W
N q
— q
O �
O. l
✓ V
W
V
b L
� n
b
L u
L ` p
u (.
�v w°
u
- O T
-N j 6N
r.L I •� s
N L O W
L p4 O • ,
Y R [ N O
O C O
`C Or
8 c CV
3J O l W
TL q�bY
b u G u W L
U C ^ T
•O W
M
p u q G
P
n � ^
T �• G
C l
L ^ W
Jl1 �I�
W
O
c
q
d
v
b
r
qW
L
C
V
P aLr.
N W
m•L-
)C P
OW
L0. u
W W
f r
0
d
W
r
T
?W
1_
m i
u i
u
O
V
� C
p
Y^
M
O
04
YN
r"
LQ C
W y
M
psi
p
d
•�O
LL4u
N6
C
r
N
N N
9
• W O'
6u
W
L C
P
p
qV0
Ur 1
^ m
No
d Y
G
O
•�
N
r0i0
+�
Or`
4
O
d L aV •.-
V N
Y
N
C C P y
L°
arOO.K
cb
qc
W
•Y
o N
OIL
}^
a
w3
3
V O
cq
.�'
q
7r
p
cif
io
WLL�q
.V
O
U
Y d
V4r C
V
b N 4
O'
Jm
LLpO
u�^
b
m
rcr'
OC
•n 000
V �V li
C�`��
p N C
V` C
. T L O
Y
.OL.
✓
n
Nc
G
V
J L
rtY1C
N L
tip'
J .y
V
P
CW«•
T.^q^
aIUP
l6.-•
JSWI
I
r0..
�
N
d q
aL•a
uu
O )
4C
Y
nV
l
bN0 q
•r0.
U �_
V-
sir
NW
.n¢
W
M
`inN os .p.•
N F�4 u
VOC
O
^0
ryL
C q
`
L
VGN�u
q••-
vi J'"cV
-�
.i
c
C u
PN or
V V
wa
c �
�. �t°rau
L p-
L V � J L
.[
Vr••
yJ
N
Iq
F
p�yN�
Ht
O
l•
d dGV
A M
N L
M
ar
P
W O
L N
p
F
ar
L
q { ^� O
On
(L
GO
LTW
rL
7
yP
�—
U
b pr �
b
L u
L ` p
u (.
�v w°
u
- O T
-N j 6N
r.L I •� s
N L O W
L p4 O • ,
Y R [ N O
O C O
`C Or
8 c CV
3J O l W
TL q�bY
b u G u W L
U C ^ T
•O W
M
p u q G
P
n � ^
T �• G
C l
L ^ W
Jl1 �I�
W
O
c
q
d
v
b
r
qW
L
C
V
P aLr.
N W
m•L-
)C P
OW
L0. u
W W
f r
0
d
W
r
P
m i
V
� C
qt
Y^
r
=q
LQ C
V
p
d
•�O
LL4u
N6
C
r
N
O q
• W O'
6u
W
L C
P
p
qV0
Ur 1
^ m
No
d Y
G
N
Zgwr'
d
°
d L aV •.-
V N
Y
N
C C P y
L°
arOO.K
W<
q
W
•Y
dl.
uJ
V
Y
q
7r
p
V
WLL�q
.V
O
U
Y d
V4r C
V
q N
O'
Jm
LLpO
`f
OC
•n 000
V �V li
C�`��
p N C
V` C
. T L O
Y
.OL.
✓
l'1
V V
i'
V
J L
q
N L
d
J .y
vL
CW«•
T.^q^
•J V
q
W^
�
N
d q
aL•a
uu
O )
4C
Y
nV
bJ.'
bN0 q
Lulr
}1
V-
Vuy q
O
M
q
N W
O
^0
ryL
C q
`
L
VGN�u
q••-
vi J'"cV
-�
CgrO�
c
RL•n
PN or
wa
c �
�. �t°rau
•`0
^ U
GqW
p�yN�
Ht
G
l•
d dGV
A M
N L
M
ar
P
W O
L N
p
F
ar
L
q { ^� O
On
(L
GO
LTW
rL
}L
yP
�—
U
b pr �
J^
••C.
L N O
p.
yL
T—^
N ar N I
•-
W
W
q u u
V
L u
4
J
--d-
W
LQ C
•�O
LL4u
N6
C
r
N
O q
• W O'
6u
W
TlL
ON P
qV0
V
Or
WumL�
W
F
d L aV •.-
V N
Y
N
C C P y
L°
arOO.K
W<
q
W
•Y
W
P -c.-
L. L
�cJL-
WLL�q
+V -r�l.
O'
Jm
LLpO
`f
OC
•n 000
V �V li
C�`��
p N C
V` C
. T L O
O
.OL.
✓
p L ••
i'
N
..Eo
J .y
vL
CW«•
T.^q^
u00Vw
G4�Y
C
V1
u
bJ.'
bN0 q
Lulr
}1
V-
Vuy q
qiV
^0
O
L
VGN�u
q••-
vi J'"cV
-�
CgrO�
c
RL•n
PN or
wa
c �
�. �t°rau
•`0
q
GqW
p�yN�
Ht
G
d dGV
hL
W
YOO
J••• O N
L ..•
VL
q { ^� O
M
CV +WC
1b
}L
e'.V
b pr �
V P +•�
L N O
p.
yL
T—^
N ar N I
•-
W
W
q u u
V
L u
y
Y
rCa
v
uYC
t�• ^VOW
V'W
N�
V4L
uW
p
PU.I.•-
6
q^
yC
L r
N O N^
y.
N
(�
u 4.• V C v
E'q q.n
J �
y
G y
NW
•O.qu
nr
=
C V
N °•n 6v
VIO Or
•L'()
yy.
WuypJ
U
--d-
i
4
d
LlP',
T
b
'r
2
•�
41
u
J N
C r
q
v
V O
C
L C
�LLLE
LW
qp
04q
�O nJ�
N
rlY4
'O
O.-.0
u..�
IC
i
L•Y•f
L
OV^
0I
N
^OA
O Uv
Ovi
••
b
B
dN
vNn
C O
yy
q
-1
p L
A
q
N qq
C N O
N
d
fu'
COSY
4
p�GV
✓
J1wi
V .��
�6
q
O �
V V
V
N
a0•N O
.O.rq T
N R�
M
C4LL
•L•
bu4
�aIf
�; w
U V
YuQ
C�`L
OYrr
L
N
> b
•S
Ar�'T
O
LL
q
yr
i +rJi
AC
OV
4
O
GL
NLN
V
U
_L'•qN
aL0
LA
NJU
t.ub
.O
U✓ {_
d
�NM
M 1
vV(N4
'Ni
�
LLLO
G�
Uv�
T
u�OYb
bL.
�
Vr!JL
I�
ACO �L�
^
n�JV
C
N
T.'N
p .� u
N T L
N
O
V q rT• pv�
n C
y
V u
Li
I-
57
�:
L �- a
6 n•
J L L
yI
bl
hI
�
��I
tJ
ll
JI
1I
♦
1
Z
♦
.iA.,.
LlP',
E
A
CITY OF RANCHO C MONGA.
MEMORANDUM
• fir.
•1.
DATE: June 10, 1981
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planer
BY: Michael Vairin. Senior Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP NO. 6596 - A &
R EC�UIPMENT
--An industrial sub ivision of W-08 acres
of land into 3 parcels within the M -'L zone located on
the northwest corner of San Bernardino Road and Lucas
Rancho Road - APN 210- 071 -40
This project requires public hearing notification to surrounding property
owners within 300' of the project boundaries. The notices were not mailed
as required and as a result the attached public hearing cannot be heard.
However, the issues outlined in the attached Staff Report and Memorandum
can be discussed by the Commission to provide the necessary direction to
Staff and the applicant. Upon direction from the Commission, Staff will
readvertise this item for public hearing and prepare the final Staff Report
for the Commission's action at the next meeting of June 24, 1981.
lly submitted,
:MV:cd
Attachments
ITEM r
CITY CF RANCt -10 Cf. AONGA
STATT R EI ORT
t�
DATE: June 10, 1981
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Joe Stofa, Assistant Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP Ei96 - A & R EWIPMENT
An in ustria su iv7sion of 4.08 acres o an into parcels
within the M -2 zone located at the northa ?st corner of San
Bernardino Avenue and Lucas Ranch Road
INTRODUCTION: This subdivision consists of Lot 8 #if recorded Tract 7936. The
subdivision, as proposed, provides for 3 parcels fir industrial use.
There is an existing commercial structure in the proposed parcel 3 with the pro-
posed parcels 1 and 2 being vacant at this time. She parcel map is acceptable
from a land division standpoint, however, the Planning Division has concerns
regarding consistency with the proposed Industrial Specific Plan minimum widths
of 100 feet on all newly created industrial lots. In addition, conceptual site
plans should be submitted for such oddly proportioned parcels-
The attached memo from the Planning Division furthe• discusses these issues.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Comniss *on carefully consider the
proposed subdivision's consistency with the desired development of the Industrial
Area, especially with respect to minimum frontage and the type of development
possible on such long, narrow lots. Staff should ti,en be directed to prepare a
resolution for either denial of the tentative map or, with the applicant's con-
currence, conditional approval with 2 lots rather then tKree. This approval,
along with the Environmental finding, can then be cuifirmed as a Consent Item
at the next meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
�y
LBH: :jaa
ITEM F
i
PICDerra of DATE
JRICACnf RrrlJn Mc.
&t410 9:76: CO
p+ /1Y31 966 8 70 7
na.11 1 nr I MIM.
TENTATIVE MAP
PAR%C1jF_"1 SAP C596
IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANZ
LEGAL LAVA DUSCRIaT10N
Lam n •wN.'f A.,. Ib ,AM w DAN ""'[D lx 1'Mn Iln ar nnr0
'CA.SO Ira AM 4f.. 04'OnD3 ar tlnr 4111P41DIUD rlN2Y.
r M.w la+ ar.D rY 0aA 9114 -, - n.1
eRarK'CM. was tP rttcrt rCALwixV.
lTltein, rrr2rVd¢, DOw, unmen
]
au
i m .
r �In4 c.s4h m UO /M! -/
°J
1.
/ F 1•'ro
-97
0
Y
y. Y` ..
MM nn `/ I }� I 1•
Y I
� I
Location sAapC_— — — __j
1 rccc sui<owa. 1 � I
i Aft"" /P • 11nYnr 4tnis
— I
I MLTn4 I tni.[' 4V:1y11:: it
l l <aolaernL•nwnnm ./ /
�' .r4.+„_ ! ^.•c...s4fr Llf .l•.•'I _ r' __ yrr/..i - ..1 IIr7 lg5I L — 1.
PrNM cwtw %�' • 1 ' Gu_
ars+ Selr
/� Parcel F --- --
q nr ct.rr..
II k 1>CI un ml2s.
inI1C+1 ONtw ✓ Parcel i. /l rtDf s0/
II 1� IF4 I
/r Sa.md..•w
1Iq AC r L7111 YiLDnY.. 1 1 eru�wn.
��»� - - -- - — ! 1
o.... w Parcel, , 3
1 r � ---- I P
`� . 1 rr rorf! I
1ft 2Mv1c • � 1 / I nb.... 1 y I
Y) 1 ,
iii A _ J
olnen.lnwrrnx. T
IInY nciDCi 4VI'nVL +I+ I'll Vl[LD I LIJt-Ix 91 -0.
AM TM Ifrr iV YLKL.
SAN EERNAFOM' — AVE
M
Ornrr
0rvr /u <rr .
plVnlL !, wNTnftl:M
n 4 P. fDOtblClff CbIVMf< 1 bMflt'lrfYl'
Sllwr• �. *. [rmrc.219b
N1D nT1rLT
I;"
LOOM. p f C w .
aa. F+n MentYrrrf' 1 •
wm
rn IrN1 10 ill!
•
1 No M rn.a.l.
L.n\ i%t
�.0 66ef /I� /Rirll�l.Y� {'I /�
2
! f rm r•w /77 9I /Sell 9s0 /K•
na.11 1 nr I MIM.
TENTATIVE MAP
PAR%C1jF_"1 SAP C596
IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANZ
LEGAL LAVA DUSCRIaT10N
Lam n •wN.'f A.,. Ib ,AM w DAN ""'[D lx 1'Mn Iln ar nnr0
'CA.SO Ira AM 4f.. 04'OnD3 ar tlnr 4111P41DIUD rlN2Y.
r M.w la+ ar.D rY 0aA 9114 -, - n.1
eRarK'CM. was tP rttcrt rCALwixV.
lTltein, rrr2rVd¢, DOw, unmen
]
au
i m .
r �In4 c.s4h m UO /M! -/
°J
1.
/ F 1•'ro
-97
0
Y
y. Y` ..
MM nn `/ I }� I 1•
Y I
� I
Location sAapC_— — — __j
1 rccc sui<owa. 1 � I
i Aft"" /P • 11nYnr 4tnis
— I
I MLTn4 I tni.[' 4V:1y11:: it
l l <aolaernL•nwnnm ./ /
�' .r4.+„_ ! ^.•c...s4fr Llf .l•.•'I _ r' __ yrr/..i - ..1 IIr7 lg5I L — 1.
PrNM cwtw %�' • 1 ' Gu_
ars+ Selr
/� Parcel F --- --
q nr ct.rr..
II k 1>CI un ml2s.
inI1C+1 ONtw ✓ Parcel i. /l rtDf s0/
II 1� IF4 I
/r Sa.md..•w
1Iq AC r L7111 YiLDnY.. 1 1 eru�wn.
��»� - - -- - — ! 1
o.... w Parcel, , 3
1 r � ---- I P
`� . 1 rr rorf! I
1ft 2Mv1c • � 1 / I nb.... 1 y I
Y) 1 ,
iii A _ J
olnen.lnwrrnx. T
IInY nciDCi 4VI'nVL +I+ I'll Vl[LD I LIJt-Ix 91 -0.
AM TM Ifrr iV YLKL.
SAN EERNAFOM' — AVE
M
CITY OF RANCHO CAVIONGA
METWORANDUM
DATE: June 1, 1981
TO: Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer
FROM: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner �1
SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 6596 - A & R EQUIPMENT - An
industrial subdivision of 4.08 acres of land into 3
parcels within the M -2 zone located on the northwest
corner of San Bernardino Road and Lucas Ranch Road -
APN 210 - 071 -40
In reviewing the above - described parcel map, the Planning Division
had concerns regarding the development of the northerly two parcels.
These two parcels do not meet the proposed minimum width requirements
of the Industrial Specific Plan. The proposed Industrial Specific
Plan will be requiring minimum 100' widths on all newly created
industrial lots. The proposed subdivision does not meet this stan-
dard and Staff has concerns that the potential for development of
these two parcels, without the minimum 100' width, is very limited.
In addition the Planning Commission has, in the past, request.d
conceptual development plans indicating how the parcels could be
developed under current development standards regarding access,
parking, and interior circulation. .Unless these issues can be
fully addressed, the Planning Division Staff could not support this
subdivision. It is rc- commended that these issues be brought before
the Planning Commission for their review and resolution.
MV:jr
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITE ENGINEER'S REPORT
rt�.�lI
FILED BY: A & R Eauio0: G9LnFany _ TENTATIVE MAP NO. PM 6596
LOCATION: northwest corner of San-Bernardino Ave . DATE FILED: 4/23/81 _
and Lura5 Ranch Road _ NUMBER OF LOTS:
LEGAL OESCRIPT ?ON: Lot 8. TrUt 7936 _ RECEIPT NUMBER: 11102
FEE: 5250 00
ZONE: M?
* * * * * * #• * * a * * it * * * * t * * * * * #• * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
TENTATIVE MAP PREPARED EY: .i Richard Newton GROSS ACREAGE: 4.08 acres
ADDRESS: ?4 li s . "T" Street MINIMUM LOT AREA: 41.828 sa. ft.
Ortarjo. CA 91762 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE:
RECORD OWNER(S) ADDRESS PHONE W
0 9254 F4��ILSr�at 987 _6295
REPORT OF THE CITY ENGINES°
Dedications
_ 1. Dedication by final map of all interior stree-; rights-of-way and all necessary
easements as shown on the tentative map.
_yam 2. Dedication by final map of the Following missl ;-y , ghts -of -way on the following
street3-
additional feet on
additional feet on
additional feet on
24' Corner P/L radius required on Lucas Ranch Road _
Other
X_ 3. Rights ut vehicular access shall be limited as follows: San Bernardino Ave.
4. Street vacation required for:
5. Master Plan of Streets revision required for:
_ 6. The following perimeter intersections require realignment as follows:
RCE 20
11
TENTATIVE MAP NO. 6596
Page 2.
Improvements (Bonding is required prior to ® Recording for all parcels )
❑ Building permit for )
T. Construct full street improvements (including curb and gutter, A.C. pavement-,
sidewalk, one drive approach per lot, parkway trees and --treet lighis) on all
interior streets.
X 8. Construct the following missing improvements on the -following streets:
*inrlimlinn Innlcraninn and irrinn4finn nn ma+a,,.
STREET NAME
CURB &
GUTTER
A.C.
PV,MT.
SIDE-
WALK
DRIVE
APPR.
STREET
TREES
STREET
ILIGHTS
MEDIAN
ISLAND*
- -�
OTHER
Lucas -Ranch Rd
re a-i r
I X
X
X
San nd Ave.
rex
X
X
X
Lie
9. Construct all storm drain and drainage structures as shown on the tentative
map, or as required by the City Engineer.
X_ 10. Provide all utility services to each lot including sanitary sewers, water,
electric power, gas, telephone and cable television.conduit. All utilities
are to be underground.
_X 11. Developer shall coordinate, anc where necessary, pay for the relocation of
any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary.
X 12. Install appropriate street name signs and traffic control signs with loca-
tions and types approved by the City Engineer.
_ 13. Developer is to provide all construction plans for drainage and street im-
provements. Such plans shall meet approval of the City Engineer.
X 14. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water
District standards. A letter of acceptance is required.
_ (X 15. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern.
California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall be decorative
poles with underqround service.
_ 16. The following existing streets being torn up by new services will require an
A.C. overlay:
17. The following specific imensions, i.e., cul-de-sac radius, street section
widths) are not approved:
18. The following existing streets etrn eubstasdar
They will require:
Approvals and Fees
_ 19. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CALTRANS/
San Bernardino County Flood Control District.
X 20. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agen-
cies involved. Approval of the final man will be subject to any requirements
that may be received from them.
RCE 20
TENTATIVE MAP N0. 6596 Page 3
is X 21. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows.
A. Caltrans, for: _
B. City.
i�- C. County Dust Abatement District:
_ D. D.I.S. Trenching Permit if any trenches are over 5 deep:
E. Cucamonga County Water District:
F. Other:
Map Control
22. If only a portion of this Map is recorded, adjustments shall be made to pro-
vide for two -way traffic and parking on all affected streets.
23. The following lots appear to be substandard in either frontage, depth or area
and should be corrected on the final map:
X 24. All corner lots shall have a corner radius at the right -of -way line accord-
- ante with the City of Rancho Cucamonga standards.
_ 25. A Parcel Map shall be recorded prior to the first phase subdivision to prevent
the creation of an unrecognized parcel located _
26. The boundary of the Tentative Map needs clarification as follows:
27. The border shall be shown to centerline of existing perimeter streets, or
title explanation required.
0 Parcel Map Waiver
28. Information submitted at the time of application ic / is not sufficient
to support the issuance of a waiver of Parcel Map ertif7 ate, according to
requirements of the State Map Act and local ordinances.
Flocd Control (Bonding is required prior to [A Recording for all parcels )
0 Building permit for )
X 29. Proposed subdivision falls within those areas indicated as subject to flood-
- ing under the National Flood Insurance Program. This subdivision will be
subject to the provisions of that program and Ordinance No. 24.
X 30. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall along the entire north pro-
- perty line may be required to divert sheet runoff to streets.
Such flow may be required to go under sidewalks through culverts.
31. If water surface is above top of curb, 30" walls shall be required at the
back of the sidewal' at all downstream curb returns.
32. Culverts required to be constructed across streets at following locations:`
_ 33. Broad scale hydrologic studies will a required to assess impact of increased
runoff.
X 34. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be required and shall
be delineated or noticed on the final map.
RCE 20
TENTATIVE MAP N0. 6596
Mi scel I areous
Page 4
X 35. Dust abatement will be made a condition of issuance of the grading permit for
this project.
36. Noise impact on this project will be mitigated in accordance with the Planning
Division report on subject property.
_ 37. This property is not within the present City Boundary and will require
annexation.
_ 38. All information required to be shown on the tentative map is not shown as re-
quired:
X 39. Proper grading and erosion control, including the preventation of sedimenta -•
tion or damage to offsite property shall be provided for as required.
_ 40. A preliminary soils report will not be required for this site for -the follow-
ing reasons: A copy of the soils report furnished to the Building Division
prior to grading will be furnished to the Engineering Division.
X 41. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that
sewFr• treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are
requeted. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water
District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will
not be issued unless said certification is received in writing.
X_ 42. The City Engineer shall make the determination, in accordance with Section
66436(C)(1) of the Subdivision Map Act, that division and development of the
property will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise
of any public entity or public utility right -of -way or easement and the signa-
ture of any such public entity or public utility may be omitted from the fina
snap unless the City is notified in writing of any objection to said determina-
tion within the specified time limits of said Section.
x_ 43. At the time of Final Map submittal, the following shall be submitted: Traverse
calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and/
or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced.
44. Development shall be limited to one drive approach per street. Multiple lots
fronting on a single street shall use common drive approaches at lot lines.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LLOYD B. HUBBS
CITY ENGINEER
By:
RC£ 20
L'I
(ZITY OF RANCHO C(,'(. US0 GA
STTA.EF REPORT
DATE: June 10, 1981
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PlO. B1_12 ; VICTOR D. EASON - Interim Use
of business office located at 9513 Business Center Drive, Suite
J, for the Foursquare Gospel Church in Rancho Cucamonga.
ABSTRACT: The applicant is requesting review and approval for an interim
church facility to be located in the Cucamonga Business Park, as described
above. This request is similar to the Gala Fellowship application previously
approved by the Planning Commission. Staff has provided the appropriate
Resolution of Approval with Conditions for your review and consideration.
BACKGROUND: The applicant, Victor D. Eason,'representieig Victory Chapel,
has requested approval to occupy a suite in the Cucamonga Business Park
located generally on the southwest corner of Arrow and Archibald Avenues
(Exhibit "A "). The applicants are proposing to utilize the suite as a
business office during the regular work week, for prayer meetings on Wednesday
evenings, and regular church services on Sunday mornings. Attached please
find a letter from the applicant outlining the specific use proposed for
the offices. In addition, the applicant has provided a survey of existing
or potential tenants in the building also attached. It is the applicant's
intention that this would be an interim facility for an unspecified length
of time until the congregation is large enough to support a permanent
facility.
ITEM G
I
Staff Report
June 10, 1981
Page 2
ANALYSIS: The present site is currently zoned M -1, with a General Plan land
use designation of General Industrial. Church related uses ire allowed subject
to approval of a Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Cofmmission. The
existing uses in the surrounding suites of the building are various business
uses which operate on weekdays generally from the hours from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
The church business office will occupy the space on weekdays; Wednesday evenings,
after 6 p.m., the applicants intend to use the suite for prayer meetings, Sunday
mornings would be for regular church services. There are approximately 70
parking spaces within the immediate vicinity of the location of the proposed
use (Exhibit " ").
As the Commission will recall from their review and approval of the Gala Fellow-
ship application, the main issue relative to church uses in industrial zones is
parking availability. The church presently has approximately 40 members in the
congregation. Since the group meetings and activities will occur at tires other
than normal business operation hours of the industrial park, ample parking
should be available. None of the present businesses in the immediate vicinity
of the proposed use are open or in operation on Sunday morning, or evenings, and
would therefore not conflict with the proposed use. Staff has attached recommended
Conditions of Approval, similar to those used on the Gala Fellowship application
relative to time limits and hours of operation.
CORRESPONDENCE: A public hearing notice was advertised in the Daily Report
newspaper on May 29, 1981. And 32 public hearing notices were sent to surround-
ing property owners within 300' of the project site. To date, no correspondence
has been received either for or against this project.
RKOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the
above- described regv st and consider all input and material relative to this
project. A Resolution of Approval with Conditiors is provided for your review
and consideration.
11
BKN:DC:jr"
Attachments:
tted,
Letter from Applicant
Tenant Survey
Exhibit "A" - Location
Exhibit "B" - Proposed
Resolution of Approval
Map
Parking Areas /Site Plan
with Conditions
L_I
C.m
0
0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
P. O. Bos; 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
ATTENTION: Planning Department
RE: 9513 Business Center Drive Suite J
Dear Sirs:
The subject premises, 9513 Business Center Drive, Suite•J
of Cucamonga Business Park, Rancho Cucamonga, will be used
during the regular work week as the business offices of
Victory Chapel. Prayer Meeting will be held after 6:00
P.M. on Wednesdays and regular church services will be
conducted on Sunday mornings.
We do not anticipate a conflict with adjacent businesses
due to parking because of the offset time of our activities.
We will be using our facility when the other businesses
located within the park will be generally closed.
Victory Chapel represents the establishment of a New
Church of The Foursquare Gospel in Rancho Cucamonga and
this location represents,only an interim facility until
we establish our permanent church.
There are presently approximately 40 members of the congre-
gation representing approximately half that many automobiles.
This would seem to have a minimal impact on the park in
general.
The suite does not require any improvements or modifications
as it is very functional for our reeds at this time. We
may make some minor modifications such as the addition of
a short section of partition but that would come later.
Again we do not anticipate any conflict with the other tenants
within the park because of the different times of use.
Res ectfully submitted,
VICTOR D. EASON
/fj
"Ni
L]
TYPE OF USE AND HOURS OF OPERr.TION
OF EACH ADJACENT OCCUPANT,IN BUILDING 8
WHOSE'PAR1rING COULD BE USED BY VICTORY CHAPEL
SUITE A
Sherry's Place - Catering - Office /Warehouse
Monday - Friday 7:00 - 7:00
SUITE B
Vacant - Offices
SUITE C
'Vacant_ - Offices - Under discussion with an Insurance
Company whose hours would be 8:00 - 5:0P Monday - Friday
SUITE D
Vacant - Office /Warehouse under discussion with a
company that sells and services private telephone
equipment whose hours would be from 8:00 - 6:00
Monday - Friday
SUITE E
American Printing - General Printing Services
Office /Warehouse Hours 8:00 - 5:30 Monday - Friday
SUITE F
Vacant Office /Warehouse
SUITE G
William Shubin - Offices - Certified Public
Accounting 8:00 - 5:00 Monday - Friday
SUITE H
Forecast Mortgage - Offices - 2nd Trust Deeds
8:00 - 6:00 Monday - Friday
SUITE _J
Victory Chapel - Business Offices - 9:00 - 5:00
Monday - Friday Wednesday Evening after 6:00
Sunday Mornings
a
tv.gp`
1. io.e
1A
CITY O
RANCHO CU NMONGA
PLA.NN[RG DIVISION
ITEM: xe�C $e'10
TITLE: WCOMCb4 MAP
EXHIBIT: °°"°
C55�
NORTH
1
II:
A
\ I,
547 _ _
• "( a °-
rj yll R.' NI •yAJJR
pY/ N.1.Yy NI JRI
AA.10I O/I{M.Y MLI 1�JIJR ��
trw[M1IJR •J1•J{ (rl i
%1YL']Il_ oRRi lj . YM4Ml4'l OlwN a .i
..�.0 s!R • e:n• xA� j rado
wi•YtA JIAILYII . YS1J'�livI• /' Ybl
LOCATION OF THE UNIT TO BE USED BY VICTORY CHAPEL
LOCATION OF PARKING SPACES AVAILABLE
FOR EVENING AND SUNDAY MORNING USE
NUITH
CITY 01' ITEM: Cop ql-lo
RANCI i0 Ci'CAiVtlO \'GA TITLE: i1' g
PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: SCALE. ""I
Wr.
0
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING
COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
N0. 81 -10 FOR VICTORY CHAPEL LOCATED AT
9513 BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE, SUITE J, IN THE
M -1 ZONE.
WHEREAS, on the 26th day of May, 1981, a complete application
was filed by Victor D. Eason for review of the above - described project;
and
WHEREAS, on the 10th day of June, 1981, the Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described
project.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission
_solved as follows:
SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met:
1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan,
and the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed;
and,
2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions
Alah applicable thereto, will noi; be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to
properties or improvements in the vicinity.
3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable
provisions of the Zoning Ordinance.
SECTION 2: That Conditional Use Permit No. 81 -10 is
approved subject to the following conditions:
1. This use shall be permitted at this location for two (2)
years from the date of this approval. .^.r, exteoision by
the Planning Commission could be granted if extenuating
circumstances are present.
2. The offices shall be used as business offices only during
the week days from the hours of 3:00 a.m. to 6:00 P.M.
The offices may be used for group meetings only after
6:00 p.m. on week nights and during the weekend as long
as adequate parking is available.
3. No group meetings will be permitted which would exceed
the available parking or cause adverse affects upon
abutting businesses or properties. If such problems
arise, then this item will be brought before the Commission
for their consideration and possib'.c termination of such
use.
Resolution No.
Page 2
El
4. All City Codes and Ordinances shall be complied with at
all tines.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS IOTH DAY OF JUNE, 1981.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Richard Dahl, Chairman —
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Planning Commission
1, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 10th day of June, 1981 by the following vote to-
wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
LA
CITY OF RAN 010 CLAONGA
< Cr
of o
FII � Z
1977 [
DATE: June 10, 190-i
TO: Mcmkers of the Planning Cc- :ss•ion
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Assistant Pla.nn !r
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 81 -11 -
bEASON --The development of 1 5, `L8 square foot professional
office complex and a 4,355 square foot restaurant building
on 1.84 acre_ lend in the AP (Administrative Professional)
zone, loc-tnd on the wept side of Archibald Avenue approximately
150' south of Jevoyi, Street - APN 208 - 801 -39 and 40.
ABSTRACT: The applicant is requesting review and approval for the
development of a two story uffice builiing and a Steer 'N' Stein
to be located on the west side of Archbald south of Devon as de-
scribed above. This is a new Developm!nt Review application for
the same property upon which the applicant received approval for
a professional office complex in Augus- of 1.980, Director Review
No. 80 -30. The project has been revieted by the Design and Devel-
opment Review Committees and has under one appropriate revisions
per their comments. Staff has reviewer the project and has recom-
mended conditions of approval for your review and consideration.
BACKGROUND: The applicant is proposing construction of a 15,128
square foot professional office buildin3 and 4,355 square foot
Steer 'N' Stein restaurant on 1.84 acre; of land. The project site
is located on the west side of Archiball Avenue approximately 150'
south of Devon Street (Exhibit "A "). The site presently contains
a masonry and wood storage building tha: is in a blighted condition
from fire. In addition, the site contains numerous mature trees,
some of whicK were partiai:y destroyed 9y fire; the remainder of
the site is vacant. The project site is bounded on the west and north
by single family residences and on the south by vacant land. The
er.istir; -.rade gently slopes from the north to the south at approxi-
mately a 2% grade as indicated in the Conceptual Grading Plan
(Exhibit "F ") The property is presently zoned AP ( Administrative/
Professional Office), and the General P13n designates this site
for office uses.
ITEM H
I
r
i
f
�J
Staff Report
June 10, 1921
Paae 2
ANALYSIS: The Site Development Plan, Exhibit "B ", has been developed
in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance standards and requirements.
Setbacks, parking requirements, and landscaped areas are all being pro -
vided in accordance with standards and policies set oy the Planning
Commission. Archibald Avenue is a Special Boulevard in the General
Plan and the applicant has proposed to landscape it accordingly. The
applicant is proposing to retain existing healthy trees whenever possible,
in order to preserve the site character and provide a mature landscape
appearance to the project (See Exhibit "B "). Staff recommends that the
parking lot design be revised to provide a landscape planter as shown
on the attached Exhibit "G ".
Access to the site is being provided by a single driveway located near
the north property line, with a shared emergency access lane being
provided at the south property line. Full street improvements will
be required -including curbs, gutters, meandering sidewalks, and street Aft
The building elevations, as shown on Exhibits "C, D, E" indicate the use of
horizontal cedar siding, scored cedar fascia, dark stained wood trims,
heavy timber trellis , do accent color band, and concrete g64-e- the
roofing. Colored elevations, renderings, and 'building materials samples
will be available at the Planning Commission meeting.
The Design Review Committee has reviewed the project and recommended
approval of the design with the exception of the south elevation of
the restaurant building. The Committee felt that high visibility of
this elevation on a Special. Boulevard warranted additional architectual
treatment. Therefore, it is recommended that the project be conditioned
to require this elevation to be revised and brought back to the Design
Review Committee prior to issuance of building permits. Additionaliy,
it is recommended that a minimum of four 15 gallon trees be planted
along the south elevation.
El
E
Staff Report
June 10, 1981
Page 3
0
RECOMMENDATION- It is recommended that the Planning Commission review
and consider the various aspects of this project. If the Commission
concurs with the .findings and analysis of Staff, then appropriate
conditions of approval are attached for your review and consideration.
Res/ectfully submitted,
Cif PlanrJe,,
BKH:DC:jr
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Restaurant Elevations
Exhibit "D" - Restaurant Elevations
Exhibit "E" - Office Elevations
Exhibit "F" - Conceptual Grading Plan
Exhibit "G" - Proposed Parking Lot Revision
Part I - Initial Study
Resolution of Approval with Conditions
'_QTY ' I": `
ifs
:i
'_QTY ' I": `
ifs
0
1.41�V._.. C✓�Y
�YY•Y�w.n eNC W..�.� G
ONZ SYMBOL*
ir..•
NNMO fYq • t0 NY.N NMM YNI[YVY�
1 . � OYMw11Y VYY • [O Y[ NMtYO [MO YI![
�•Y ` NptIM IY[•ION [YYq[NJ1gg0
�� OYWINO VY[... fYYYYMYMO
YO f4q
tYV.[[V YY[ • YO /[t YRt p YYON
+aN.goM. NNYIYNYIY
CITY OF
AM RANO-10 CUCANIONGA
qp PL kNNI \G DIVISON
e i0
k %�i
ITG\ I !2z I (r e l _
TITLE `lam ?Lm
EXHIBIT: 1 SCALE:
E
SOUTH IELEVATIOW
CITE' OF ITEM: - - 9 I" 11
RAI CHO CUCATMONGA TITLE F"eS !?
�c
PLANN:NC DIVISION EX1I113M. I' _SCALE:
C
LI
t11Y..p.11 C<OM.Y1.p 11 <Y�0 -1 / :� - - �COYYY„<WMY1Y[Ypy�p
All
EAST ELEVATION
Lim
_..
I08Ti E4EIAT:OI ..+ a.. .c.a.ws . a<Y-
CITY Or, ITEM:-
RANCHO CUCANION - A TITLE: 26SONA NT f &pINg.,
PLr �'NI \G UI �'ISIO�i LX1 {IBIT: r - SCALE- """`
<OM .blw b,H110
0
COM<n....N,Ne iM< n00 /INO
0
._9W_N +s,..ns auu
EAST A WEST ELEVATIONS
�.2iV :KNrt C.O.O .NM ,."$. MO.•O.O.
1 �
....._.. U �'i .. ... c...
NORTH & SOUTH ELEVATIONS
CITY OF
RANCHO CL GUNION;GA
PLANNING DIVISION
ITEM: f.L�• 41 ° 11
TITLE- °L.EA//�Mbis'�2
EXHIBIT- SCALE:
L-I]
E
nn/ 1 1 sr:
asr•IcC rfWi.k�JIML
1 i _
�a ry
, .I I •f 1.4.
w I: •
c 1
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCATNIOi'GA
PLANNING DIVISION
E
:r
r( • 1 a
L� V
NORTH
ITEM: og $l
TITLE: CoNdSM&L
EXHIBIT: SCALE-
r
x
� .. � - =
%"
i- :fir .-
.- .•...�
;, `
s
_
rc(iriaeo
-J
:: n•
-'.
L� V
NORTH
ITEM: og $l
TITLE: CoNdSM&L
EXHIBIT: SCALE-
E
ti✓....,.+�....1-- .�+_.. ...�- �"a..�.J.- --ter -._.._ ...'�_..�.
In
1
1�
NORTH
CITY Or, ITEM: - -- .rx . LL_
IAANCIAO CL'C.Aii /IO \'GA TITLE: ?9op���o
PLA INNING DIVISION LXI-II[3lT: __ -_64__ SCALE:
.y
.+1 e
lu
4 46
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
INITIAL STUDY
PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant
Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $80.00
For all projects requiring environmental review, this
form must be completed and submitted to the Development
Review Committee through the department where the
project application is made. Upon receipt of this
application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare
Part 1I of the Initial Study. The Development Review
Committee will meet and take action no later than ten
(10) days before the public meeting at which time the
project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of
three determinations: 1) The project will have no
environmental impact and a Negative Declaraticn will be
filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact
and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or
3) An additional information report should be supplied
by the applicant giving further information concerning
the proposed project.
PROJECT TITLE: Las Palmas Commercial Center
APPLICAiv'T'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE:
DEASON & ASSOCIATES,
INC., 1802 East "G" Street, Ontaric, CA 91764
NAME:, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF ERSO D T HaBri sO ALA
CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Thomas
130 East 9th Street, Upland, CA 91786 714 981 -3632
835 Z,Iand9' J f chib(' AvenueDPRancAtro CAUCamonya�P.B CEL NO.)
,�,.,. ..1 P ,..a �„ - 268 -80/ - 39.4 -0 C _
LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL,
FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING
None
- Y -!
REGIONAL, STATE
SUCH PERMITS:
i
AND
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: A 17,860 square foot 2-story
office building and a 4,T=squaretoot restauran
building
ACRF1'GE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND
PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY:
_Acreage: 1.84 - No existing buildings
DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE
INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES),
ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE
OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY
EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACIi NECESSARY SHEETS):
The project -site is presently in a blighted state. It is
existing trees partially destroyed (burned during a s ruc-
ure ire, ) 1ha topography is level with a na ura gra e
to Lne south. txisting structures consis t of one 20, x
masonry wood storage bu lding. It is also •.n a blighted
state and should be removed. Properties surrounding the
site are ei er Vacant or, 7r, medium ens resideTLIal
inhabit the site. There are also no cultural, is oric
or scenic aspects associated withthe site.
the project, part of a larger project, one of a series
cumulative actio.is, which although indiviuua llv small,
as a whole have significant_ environmental impact?
WILL THIS PRCiSECT:
YES NO ..
M XX 1. Create a substantial change in ground
contours?
XX 2. Create a substantial change in existing
noise or vibration?
XX 3. Create a substantial change in demand for
municipal services (police, fire, water.,
sewage, etc. ):
XX 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or
general plan designations?
XX 5: Remove any existing trees? How many?
XX 6. Create the need for use or disposal of
potentially hazardous materials such as
toxic substances, flammables or explosives?
Explanation of any YES answers above:
IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of
residential units, complete the form on the
next page.
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished
above and in the attached exhibits present the data and
in °ormaticn required for this initial evaluation to the
best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and
information presented are true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief. I further understand that
additional information may be required to be submitted
before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Development
Review Committee.
Date -� Sig::atur .0as rr
Title
I- -13
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESO:.UTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING
COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 81 -11
LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE APPROXIMATELY
150' SOUTH OF DEV014 STREET
IN THE AP ZONE.
WHEREAS, on the 6th day of March, 1981, a complete application
was filed by James Ii. Deason for review of the above - described project;
and
WHEREAS, on the 10th day of June, 1981, the Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above - described
project.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission
resolved as follows:
SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met:
1. That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of
the Zoning Ordinance and the purposes of the zone in
.which the use is proposed; and,
2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be det- imental to the public
health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to
properties or improvements in the vicinity; and,
3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the
applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance; and
4. That the proposed project is consistent with the General
Plan.
SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse
impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on
June 10, 1981.
SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 81 -11 is approved
subject to the following conditions and attached standard conditions:
1. The south elevation of the restaurant shall be
revised and brought back to the Design Review
Committee for approval prior to issuance of
building permits.
Z. A miniv,:--m of four (4) 15- gallon tree. be planted
along the mouth elevation of t;,e restaurant.
r
C
E
Resolution No.
Page 2
3. The parking lot shall be revised to include a planter
near the main entrance to the parking lot to the satis-
faction of the City Planner.
4. A lot line adjustment for the project site shall be
recorded prior to issuance of building permits.
5. The secondary emergency access shat. be constructed
of compacted decomposed granite and r_cvered with 6
inches of native :;oil and planted with grass.
6. A six (6) foot high masonry wall will be provided
along the west and north property lines.
7. Dense landscaping shall be provided around the
perimeter of the project for screening and buf-
fering purposes.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 1981.
ANN PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: _
Richard Dahl, Chairman
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Planning Commission
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 10th clay of June, 1981 by the following vote to-
wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES- COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIm'ERS.
-1
2
i�
E
n
T
W
O
W
rJ
v
W
O
f
i
D
O
V
0
-r_
ti
u q C
V u �
W •� u
D 6 tqi
N
r
SY
JO
O
S�
1.
d
U
rc
r _
O O
L6 ..
q Q
u
Y V
9 n
C W
°
iV. U
R F
a
V
y J
V Q
u G
o gip.
1-. Q LOi
Y
C
N
k '
r L
tv C
L 9
W
p_
q v
d O
Y V
Y 1
Y Y
Y p
C
q V
9 Y
V M
4
c
.^ N
C
4 N
N
q �
o P
a C
t C
n A
V
a Y u
Q
oa A
O V
V V
u O y-
N W
O + W C
V V
Y N
q L N Q
Y L
n _ E
u j
40 VC
L _
C G pq V
TO C V .°-
rce � ^
^up Yv
YC OY .
Pw c�a
c « ^ o c
O •.N
'� qN
C d L nrn
N+U N N C rn
N ^m
I-
N O V O O yJ
v
T r
L
>•^ < L
R L N P V
nJ C
N L E J Y Y W T
m l
'^ IV
R A T R O f V C V
yw ANN PW C „rLii
nM wYY 'nc °u rn
U P f N Nl'
�R du•rC• ^� Oq
_ C Y C R 6
_L ETq N �42
R vLi 4.0 2n Va
4 .`C
N W q W O V O'er
^� gPi wCi
Vn ^r}
m V C l Q L 6 C L
R tr =
4y Q V qL LL N J q
2 n
^ � V y V O N R O✓
i•� W �� •4 u a
L tJY V> p °lY
L L P N
49
9 u
�
C
N
C O
C N C
y
'_
N V
Y
W
y d
6 O .-•
a
T
n
$
N
l C P.•
'�
C
A
V
^
•O
y^
N
N
�
dq9
N C
G V
C
T/ O
V
W
nL
C O
V Y^
P t
V n
N V
q�a
vW
°IN
o�io
W
OV
^yC
9 y.
O
j�L
•L-' W M
L
yy
uGIO.'L
O O s
t1
O
S
W`
r R V
O• i
W
qY
y
^9
uY
^
C
n
y��
L•
d•.• V n
r1
brJ�9T
L_
�•OT
!l; �r
'
02
•GOO
C O
V Ny
W
O
�C �O
W
C G V N
O
YC
q6•
L u
V
N
^Y
aT
r
N
C
LCF
`y
^UN
tl��w�
pY
w'
L
� •_
�'OOCO
C C 1°.
S L_V
L E
`a
L
.'
LG
C
�w�
LL
q L
9�n.NU
L
C'Fi
.+✓V
v
l0 w.
C
P
4r
` A+
y
Y
V u r
�
C
•O L
t�pVW
•J C L V n n
^L
6
r
N
Q
q
V
.-.
� V V•�Y
•V
n^
'�O
OgOy
•�N
NL
V
�
�
a'E
L
9 L
V
••U.
O\.
LN4 �ti
r
T.�
bNrOi.0
W
�
G'Q
4l�9
'D Qn
V•YiQ9
V�
CV
V
LwO
V
.�.
9
�
^O
w
'J
VLL-N
M �
J+N Tyn
.rV.
V6
C9G
L ^yt�'�A
N6
uU
C4O V
yyr
l
Z.
^tin
O
�q
q N
OY4� Y.
=iW'
J"w.l
«
a
a
FLOC
G
nr
a��c
a.
P
�P °c o•°
vn
NC
i
v-.•
L
t%.°.
is
yu
Ewa
=
•V�ONqu
OL
dV
N•
�
n
6Y0i
OY
r. C
N V 1
C.
Nyy
^N
u
YCC I'
q
gY•+•la
y
V�
l n.
C
NL4YU.
d
y`
Oo70 J•Cq
-v.0
Ou
�
W
r
Liu
'V
QC
CN•.0
w
Q°'
VO•
C C` N
`
�'
qL
9
N
y
•rl
VMN
..°.
py
LN V.�
1
n •
�YU
UN V_
i�ys1
��
N
O.
'V
T^r
r
L
VOY
r
n
r'�u
°^
O
C
��
LAi�uZ
+
q
-nV
�Wl�J
N'
46 'r, ••n _P"
•-
Y�
L
C
•°..
CC
d If Y u
r
C p
F
pC. L°. L
w
N ^
4
rp
�d
N v
aL
j
i
c gl c
o"i
u i 6i
a'rn
OGl
gV-ii
'V^
N
Wu
L
4 N
L
lr
VLO
�O
•"•C
�k
60
OLO
q
�~
�fj
p
V.+
aVOVO• -•
L
W
NCO
9MU' C
q
NC
L •^
06
9
L
..
�°NLL
•••
YUaq
wCN
N^
W C
lr .•
S u
r_
C Y Or N +-
ip
L d V L u LL
a
T'
�9m
L�
YVjr
� O�
C P
L
'V G< W
l
O �
Y
4 V L U G
W
on
V^
C
uuW
S
pCC
Y.
^••1
yO9
GYp
V au
OW
C
2C
Y
vY
YC
9iL
LGU�'Vw
•.
^ E T, M
^Y
�4
M~
OVI
wglCL�Y.
n 9
wu
IJ OU
V
NVtC''dOCd
C
C R
.•y
N A
«
O q V
d N
i•.
F 'V
a r..
l[LLr
p
•- V
+•C
O
VL
M
'
VL •
OVV
Y
O
V
C
OC ^?•_M
.I rN.
�
O 4 M p
rp
C O O O
LlC
.OV
L
ON
"OZ
9L
dO
q -YD
'J
4N
u
Q
�O
AN
.� O
Y°
a
7
d'O
'n
i'u
„b
•N
WGNN
`
�W�^
6.LwYi
•n d
44
Na
SV
r
W
Y
L
V` 'C!
�' Y
d L
Qb
Vr
•t[N
W•rL•LY
1-•j
Wyq..
Q/ yV
J.•M NL i,
i•••�
4•VL
�VN••
LdLVLp
NYY
[��.
1�LVAUq
N
O
•�
^
�I
VI
NI
n,
�
u q C
V u �
W •� u
D 6 tqi
N
r
SY
JO
O
S�
1.
d
U
rc
r _
O O
L6 ..
q Q
u
Y V
9 n
C W
°
iV. U
R F
a
V
y J
V Q
u G
o gip.
1-. Q LOi
Y
C
N
k '
r L
tv C
L 9
W
p_
q v
d O
Y V
Y 1
Y Y
Y p
C
q V
9 Y
V M
4
c
.^ N
C
4 N
N
q �
o P
a C
t C
n A
V
a Y u
Q
oa A
O V
V V
u O y-
N W
O + W C
V V
Y N
q L N Q
Y L
n _ E
u j
40 VC
L _
C G pq V
TO C V .°-
rce � ^
^up Yv
YC OY .
Pw c�a
c « ^ o c
O •.N
'� qN
C d L nrn
N+U N N C rn
N ^m
I-
N O V O O yJ
v
T r
L
>•^ < L
R L N P V
nJ C
N L E J Y Y W T
m l
'^ IV
R A T R O f V C V
yw ANN PW C „rLii
nM wYY 'nc °u rn
U P f N Nl'
�R du•rC• ^� Oq
_ C Y C R 6
_L ETq N �42
R vLi 4.0 2n Va
4 .`C
N W q W O V O'er
^� gPi wCi
Vn ^r}
m V C l Q L 6 C L
R tr =
4y Q V qL LL N J q
2 n
^ � V y V O N R O✓
i•� W �� •4 u a
L tJY V> p °lY
L L P N
49
by
r
O
V
9 .
O NO
(n
C N
°s
Y
L W ^
Y P
r q
L q gg
Y '$
L Y EEC
n
_ q
V u W
u
U•rL. •�
F�
L
N V yVi
Y Win• L
Y q
V: Cn N Y
l
V
q Vq R Ol
s o a
tiII
m
d
D r
^ L O
R n q
M
Y � W
G r V
N R
u V �
9 w
� q Y
C i
Y Y
Y Y P
q Y
W 7 _
Y O
Y N
Y W
uC
C
q O
Y
9 w �
r � u
pC/
Y 'n fi
n
e c o
r V•d
N M> •
Y
do a
P u a ^
Y q
N L O"V
4 L WV
4 v°r iu •..0 4
9 u
�
C
N
C O
C N C
y
'_
N V
Y
W
y d
6 O .-•
P V
S
'�
C
A
M q
^
•O
y^
q
N
�
dq9
N C
G V
C
O ^• d
V
W
nL
C O
V Y^
P t
V n
N V
q�a
vW
°IN
o�io
W
OV
^yC
9 y.
O
j�L
•L-' W M
L
yy
uGIO.'L
O O s
t1
O
S
W`
r R V
O• i
W
�
y
M1 Y
q
N 1r
L•
d•.• V n
02
•GOO
C O
V Ny
W
O
�C �O
W
C G V N
O
YC
L u
V
N
^Y
(p
� •_
U.N
C C 1°.
S L_V
w
't
Y t
N
q L
V ••• �.�
V
O> y q
by
r
O
V
9 .
O NO
(n
C N
°s
Y
L W ^
Y P
r q
L q gg
Y '$
L Y EEC
n
_ q
V u W
u
U•rL. •�
F�
L
N V yVi
Y Win• L
Y q
V: Cn N Y
l
V
q Vq R Ol
s o a
tiII
m
d
D r
^ L O
R n q
M
Y � W
G r V
N R
u V �
9 w
� q Y
C i
Y Y
Y Y P
q Y
W 7 _
Y O
Y N
Y W
uC
C
q O
Y
9 w �
r � u
pC/
Y 'n fi
n
e c o
r V•d
N M> •
Y
do a
P u a ^
Y q
N L O"V
4 L WV
4 v°r iu •..0 4
P
N V G b N N N ry '� O � T C •� V C Cy VI y t A
rr0•u 1 i 2ND
1' Aq G V~ CA ✓V L O � N CO C- '04 Y �bpV nJy�N
q' d Y Y C • N b� q' � V � O T V � L u G y GG O L
L UN a VLN
?rr^ VT Ny �q� .r 17 7V �O�t
� �� .• V U ON ub�•C 'V ILy2H�•.Ci•LVO
NN L`ML N Jp N O d w.V dw V O� dl
L i b O N Np -
^O' .L.• dPr}i• G+ u W L OV PO FVAL Ob w.Ca VGA
. QVI b l f L r b u N N
^N ` L L ^O -p CT i Y d �� Pw •GUS u p��N�uyV
"—
N G 9 n c -yy'c �bu 'ov
i W .: C .� q u T Ll. A c b b �• •V � y Or N .L � � •VV N~ p i
u i NCpN
N - 'id G t ON •'iuf'e^
w�M V� [Vf A C1 I l0 � p u A
V U lOS Y > b L � V G N q V P^ L A V• O N d V p� g C�
y 6 rrOi�L OOY L_i Np 1 N O} � ud g V •'IDL ^•^irr qy
.22
L� yNN j y M V� • V< b Jpp L r lNNL6NG Y•
r N C
�i a p Avg P
° n c o ^ t- NPFL' •-d Aa w i Lo <�e.°`N
iy^ M �FNA Wr� l`
0 Oy N N d p�0. cyJyYO 'r'L L c YV V�Lm
CST It NPrrdi W�O V[C' M- LI' N gJA•dn (.Na Or GV M NYN hV VON
P q 6 C N N^ ^ V - 4' O'^ ca •�
y dP w V > > ro ^O' _ oN �N�� C
oa.� y[ v 2 c ¢ it ar.�-. c L«L• c °c" p'�dr ° -•'.NL
!E'9 v
_ Y d O V A Wc N Or `Cp L fi ` L L T• O
b� O^ Ccb 4�q N d G uC y L f! 6LdW04V9p
2 N
CrLnV FiL -�� P.Cr OL� PA > la ' O O C�V G: W.a 6 jNC '^ ✓>• A6A TV`r0
♦ N N c. + •� C N Y L^ ^} ` � V ^^ qq I V r' O V V' d - O� V P u rcr v N` N C u
^ Q C d W � }• u V L ^ N O V r N� L N Y V V V A ' V 2 L 'p C y V T N y
rOn N LT T
p C] O y S G6 d L l C -uu..•
HZ 4 NV a.2a < tiN Q 06 M CO H2� riin rpi0 G�rrOV S�Nbp
A
p C
o W
L
P
,L
"fir �'• b L P n
VANO
!� C� L'• C2 p UOL N C Vl= PrLO >•Lr -
cc L N N_•c q _. �yy � � ^ Nt�..c. -. •.- apo g
"'UUU��, •• OA ^ C Cu �VO rr'J O npL CU RV `
N.V N N F •�- V L
}�� \( \��•l.2 Vl LG� O C q�0`V O =VC „O
'� nIV L rPCU A�6 'V� rrC L ^ N60 LNdV •J• N 6
V' Lp"y YN NO !pr L My N•�pLVT C C
d d A yC u O •O b .• {y p f. C ^ L � V L O O O- � N � C
A A V d Lr - •"r 0 •N V• C V O- u- q Y 0 q
F7aCO O NY •� y
VVC -U� O V N_bN N - }Lq GVT Ca
)�qV
'CI
L V V
V ,J, W C V y V U V O� � fJ • L L L V p% � - •Vp P C C � p O A "� O L Pu
�l1 LVb drr V Ptid O+, •.• u'�C•lV+P ]•L N'r' pV� �. yr5
O 4 q
-42 O'
��.y� b V -d W N V•+P 4N Pi Na4Y p+-
r Nut d` W ^b�••V• PyV 6
O L „
cC. •'o ° F, �r• Vup^ mo' a _wq �c wa w. -tip °c o>.o.. cyy. onr
A c •aL L �. d 5 N
A • V r N O U r0 N o b C u w C N q w 4 u V �� `r P Cr V V u V C✓ N' V
L
N�N� r A "' uT S`q•- S w. L tiN OG CO
Ll Y L 1] y: N U y u u - O V w d •� A N w=
} O pO W L u r N V A v OI C A N N C a V A i
TO T) Z q u � P6rr PL
�� L N N N N ✓..C• T O l� Y �� V N O Vy N H � g V V 1 Y u q� bur :}
6N N b WN y C'ql PC LV wt: C
Q P IY.^ uy 6 .6 d y.L OV ��Lbb V NO
L�•Ilyr 1V C LIV L Ou ^O L •� C C C �V 7 i
L `• V ^ T Y v c E `� T v C a L c c ^ N � y d M g N N O . L C d
c� p•+ A° a 6 N ,Nr u... d i .+ b os >,- ..�=.. �' P a .°o .°o_
o -�iy VLAr ii L Ny 4L>,N N - lrYGr N�� a° .dia N.n -L+o i� iG° N
qua b >N
V�!NAO V 2] y (bj V' Nd 0 •Vlr9 N [u T 0 VbVt 1. �- N t^ ON r�L qb
Y•Qi rVil � P L } �VU NyT� �C L NICO VOV 4w C4riQ r +CL.•• .NV TN
* y
g Q rnc. -wn C NCTJ� ":2
.� •A o c N L �[ r :: �.
^ U N d � 4 O- i d u N ` V] W L •O• -' O' nl c��= Y P. J] O O p y
r l L•'% - - ry L� O � L^ V ]•r • V L E N ^ u •� w A` V V V C• ! l ` N
6 WOIr •C 4 O hrr � O QC YI NgVN +t.N Vr 6O QPENN 4v UG a'�pp Y
G Y'
N IO A 41 01 � •� N \� < N IO � m
V
�� V •I Vr • \� C Y
H N
O Y. q u O •�. A ... L ° A p
` I N • •. ^ VD • GC J C
TCi �uR a O BUY yR mC VN.� 04 gON�q T. �
a Y a• w `' a w. W d 'w rn � d .N• n N u 2 .t. v c o G°. _ .' '1 t �� I I n � e o
V R a' WW qCN •� CL uN0 Ow TO «.•. NJC LC 1 N '� V
4' uT� � CV OyV q Lup i•_M 'u pVTU bL LN' i Y=- NN r L V
L V l m; q q V G T Y� d TI \rW. L. l �+ •• N " q N� .�V °' T N} � � i C
9 y€ C �� 'C L.-Y. 6 J \r 4 li « A V V L� C L 'n ; q > }� W C •� V' O« Y � °f N •-•
.°J �\° w � °y r «z = y7,a CWT L•.W.. c..-� aN° vM °OE � �N o G ��n
A:JV V "i 0� }LY O' VN O`+ 4q]yWY M +N u`p b L'u N 'V G, L ACS
YyV � VL L +rp L Vu' \O u-ArN+ >\NbC r+r «N 4 ✓uf'A L C L a' Tvy
q4 `L C\/q J A +�WC i Y-.•. Q�db OU rG °' t•% N r
° F Y b- ° °'y C N W r] 6 A o g -•� Y L: � W. q F 'L b N l N y
• n Y Yi riaJ `_
N+ �• N R
^+ c ° i..• b o ` «Y o c
mLN >.t L« nG° r^.°. qY� wc" N•. ° �N`o oI '^ � o0o i be �c
�blYi
L e
LI/I+ q` Rq L�a V q\`� OCU W �N L'O W�yLC „r--'a N"'C O ti� w Ya.Vrar •- 14C.
O C O L L O r- _ C .°-
al b T 4. •. L \Ar O J° .•. L L L V N y Y W Y y l }\ „ C q !N L W °` l
R a c? c .w. ^° I^ �� L y o x \°• o°. mac. N '^ c W a o o `i--• - v
T_>J pP.1Lq..°,'Lrgn ' o\. `ai« ,c,°c eoPPc�'E N °q 9 G. 1'•.> -°
L 4 b Y R.•. q N N O •� W T 1` I E .n G A A A L n L W
JV Cb NL 4q =W0 \Jn ^�= NAY C'bVdF 11u CG� Aq OV O� W V LV y � V uOd
Lp � „Cq AV 4•-> -CG' bT dTaarRA 1- q rnC ^ I W {N�b
b COQ 8 Ey C ON •-WV CDrUr luT WLCO ,CU ^ WO•
LUTq ryV VY p1OC O u_S' oVV
_ J q✓ w •n w w Y L b D N„ � 4 U N .N N O L ($ ^ f � •.• c ,l C O• ••
Lpq
4
'yO
n e
6 O N
^ l
a _
50« E=C
TU
+
�NYC6^ -/�Y FY AGO WVLr{n1 O Y "" CL° 2��'VI a ur0 N V lW
ruY +lN qr +L }O_6C NvaiV6 J ^u0 �aL ^ wn °CNq NP CD• Tb O9
y .� � d •.r L� ` N° y C O .•. N Iu g V b N u. el u C •. C ` b V
L +^ N 4 O+ � C .� N U C Y W - J V L J u O Y C. J W N � ••V. � b b
C N uN 4Nbp
l u d q" N U Y L q Z W N N V C C \` L po Y F _ u r L+ •l •...
o.t .o2 -:; iY cv u C•_ cc.. �0` pppp a L q q NJ mA
^wW -YC
Nn
q!�qN GqY Val NA Te l' �•]yyT O. Y VE O� uN
�. L L` Y g Y L u uJi m T of; V, q S J � A 6 W R ` U G L N V t L• � 4 C C. 3 C C ` P W m
2b YqN N C Y ��N u OI q J pdp0
_�y�V` Wr N^ bd"'^ .[ 6.Y• u'a'C An NA q y'P' } Y N dV uC f_�
qLq11
�y�S L L O'O +pu� O�IrV � qVr Vuby 'r CN L\W V ^VIA V Cr•-C- xL X19
M 6 y N a 0 0 0 I Y W N V Y V R CY{{j J 6 u¢° �\
uCU WNbOJ + OE t°.J gOrYO O mGC GVV' LCw•�w� CV�N v b b ON tJ0 �d
ppb
4� pp N L� b rr n C t Y W �^ N Y a Ol m a � -V ppJ ^� V w m •O
O �\lurju NC U+• V�NW gV+OT S. ^SY uOq RN Ll�ayl 4 ^L\` T x UL ^JJU O
C'^ CVV.•C -V C Lu bq
NOO C` ALU� �LS•� O l4` r ^� °rK,]C.0 TN au a b NA (p «J NV
" 4 A J U* w O W Tu p u O � [° N•- > � Y C b x m rj�'' �` � b W C
aGui. N u Oiam cGVN�Or ' ��b Rte. q ^Aq .- .0 ^L^• V j }I U`I r c �a
Ii °� >� „L i =Y uc!�v =w �Fi..c `- � xc'v PS•' ao�`a nAam i �: °o JL gc •-�
wC- rO W Omgb [`LU -Y „AOC �.:. TJN b C bYNVq A «rn C C L[I y_4 qd
L. Y L• Y C C' u C' Y �' ` N 6 V r Y -+O C d J N 1:.1 N V q ^ Y •. W Y. p
O- °-N�LU
qulua°•Cp u'u PVS ^CV N C+
m VVw rr «u� V' +VO N +NCI L]L C yA NL 'a
._ .-N o co u.�lE q =YY ^'w- 'n «'N” n`� .-•� °�
^r •mow W w'q RN W ^ -mV O�T nA q•. dl' � PYq `N NJ
ppN bq\hl °r'mc ov Lnb ^N ^u m m� a• RN J`Ns w °b>. i—qG °vC. Nn
L G a_ r� u uJ• 6K C A _ Y � [' C d ~ N C_� C Y L C M O W a q N N N n =„ R C- C p b L
O+ n O n O'er u' �. i ~ u nl 6 Gl N ..°. � W .. W + W •• N O d n' O m N N
q !\ r b y. •� •..� b } Y N > O 1: u V C i' 4 i V •• L L V «" y O'r « N N u L L' C. L � 9 T�
C
«ii b b e L R
2,5-
.•« F n urn�A gmbA
LI r q a• G...0 > N u� ^ 'Y. 0. G'' 4 rC �: q .Oi L ` � «..-• L.� 6 « L Ci.� °I O.+ L b ` L1 T Yr
O^ N J V G' j C n 0 0` L^ •-T. R L a..•V2 4.2 01, Y V O � [n ••°.
Lw.. r"..� °z�uTV ... +WNN I: N•�.- r^n °a' V
R \.q xfi .• is 'i r.�« � ri`u .'cr s _ [ �c_r� Izn O°. �. Lc iN .I 'L ° � v .. � N
N V N O 6 6 JOVGJ 6V V!'V T 3 CC � L O rt C
O V VI
� NI O 0r 'q�V•� � - `NYI f'I O \GDI \D N
ul
W
u
V
b b pq
Nit r �
d N J q N
O u
n ° N rr q ^ � r•
p. L' NVN
YY q d d d L' T q r V O
✓ P
N N9 Oqw• NW w Vbb
C O
C L r•O. y� °W L � V
V V Y..L• a T p y Q q
a t pNV oa a v.-m
Y
n °i✓ � c L v a N N J
L �
^N o`i; Ngusdi 2 s' v uLN
GN W w.d. N ° •o.P w Qc o
d,T GL ✓L r qC
G .Nn a
Y
8 I•r � q P4
V � C
ON q Y VF Y � C� U O O• Y
V p GGG W 'u
G N -• l L u A Y N C •^ N V Y O K N q
N y b T JN-r b rr
j u �� r u ' O• a
g V
L 6 pL I W L •w• ,Vn � r V O q r0/r
LC q w drL d q21 qL Ny yaV y yL
V t
VA CM,
ow
P aN c ca:
!„
zi
L ,n yr n• c a
C yr rr, ry 4 yy N V I '`
Cq „U. LL LVI
cw `cn u E.. � S.✓
u °d �rCp- cLNOn .°. �' Yo .•u «� N W a tr x'
q� NV, �4 yi NL VO. ti} j ^_ N•T• ' L ^Z
qM` q° WG _L} OW LL q,.w.. JO qJ • L
Q 6 M •p L J L T L: L L a L '- V +. L p� y1
C n �- V 6 L r1 Z n: rwi• O l7
C6I I � 1 N� • ��`
J
YC
T
C p O L J L C r L
° v .°• N C 4 V N O
q O d d d W
W W d T P w V N
ZW V up `
.,� u N° c y a c � ✓✓ °
N l° o• � Y V ° T q 4 n ^
b` d .^ L WY L W U
L q rnL YL }u oW Y
Nu V~ d6 LL YV� qL
«yl d a« uL was \. Yq M1,G
L v ^C Yp.! dN CS` ZO L
V ✓ f] Or
1 u^ U U P
s Ci c� L oil- ii ui
^ N 2 u p T^ O u 4 r Sr O N L Q
N B C b u u O ^ YI V
V •t d
N q L ^ N ✓y �^ V
O'J 6 A y� g n, `W r. q N �✓ Yu
L a
y 'O
_ L c
V Y 6 N Q�• W 2 L V �V .(L V^
'�� I��•I i�
1
7
2
d
iE
lJ
r o
d 7
Vey
1
.-
•!W-
6d C^
ti
rqr ^
C
,°r .C..°.
C
Y.W V
q ✓LL?
N2L
E
O
\ql
VyTU
�
Yl'I W
°N m
'Q
V
c
vuCu
N
q ^..• �
NPR
L N
d L b
�•^
W W
+
✓
N
N V
G P
ctr�
J
NL
N
giv d
W
} K
K 4
o
^L_
T.Y LV rr
JPCfyN/.
O
WC
tJVC
J
4 N O
✓\ L C
` ° O
✓
W
C° C V
W✓ q
u
C J
Q 6
V
r NY
v
° u .O.
° c i 6.
u o<
O e• ' u
V
V C✓
�. VI •••
W N L Y
S n i Y�
01
q s
N U
a
rWr p
✓ Or
U
oie
W
!�
n
.-q
L N
L V YJ d W
wuv
O
C -M
q
•V
q
•N
1Y
C
d p C
pL•.
„'
q r .0
ITN P
u
U
p
P L
U
Y O.r ••
Yy4TWV
'
N
✓
MWy
q u
°qy4
d
✓L
Vey
O
.-
•!W-
6d C^
ti
rqr ^
C
,°r .C..°.
C
Y.W V
q ✓LL?
N2L
E
O
rLr'
VyTU
�
Yl'I W
°N m
•%u°
V
c
vuCu
Ir C N
Yy�
q ^..• �
NPR
L N
d L b
�•^
W W
+
✓
N
N V
G P
ctr�
Wou K
NL
N
giv d
^L_
T.Y LV rr
JPCfyN/.
O
WC
tJVC
J
4 N O
✓\ L C
` ° O
✓
W
C° C V
W✓ q
u
C J
r NY
v
° u .O.
° c i 6.
u o<
O e• ' u
V
V C✓
�. VI •••
W N L Y
S n i Y�
01
q s
N U
a
rWr p
✓ Or
U
oie
L
L'wc xo
, L
n
n
.-q
L N
L V YJ d W
wuv
O
C -M
q
•V
q
•N
1Y
C
d p C
pL•.
„'
q r .0
ITN P
V✓ N
G Yn
U
p
P L
U
Y O.r ••
Yy4TWV
'
✓
MWy
q u
°qy4
u ✓
Lpp
jynlL
C.
w C �
6+• N �
u L Y P
j; W
L p O
(W(
yy
L�
06
-G�
OYq Nr
P
q 4 C
I{}� N C N
✓ a O
✓ C
N
V✓ N {' N
O •yP
•r 4�[w+ C••
Lq
NV O V
,:IP
✓ W
S•�
q
✓aC
uWgy
�•LVq
�
C.•
`A
`q \°41
.✓
V
Lr•W
WKON^
NW
YF.V GN
C
^
L ly'1 •^
q V
✓ Y.
O rl•^ q
N.q.n
l W rr N
NOO'^
QV
G
6•n
W u q
Vp✓
v
a
vi
e
n
of
o:
E
11
13
CITY OF RANCI.1C Ct;CA6�10N'C.'•.
U'',fTF r-.,.-El P ,T
DATE: June 10, 1981
TO: Members of the Planning Ccmmission
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner
BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: FNVIRON14ENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW K!. 81-07
PRAVER - The development of a reLail garden center on 1.9
acres of land in the C -2 zone to be located 100 feet east
of Helms on the south side of Foothill - APN 208 -'oi -043
and 044
ABSTRACT: The applicants have requested review and approval for
the development of a retail garden center to be located on the south-
east corner of Helms and Foothill Boulevard, The Design Review
Committee has worked extensively with the applicant in order to inte-
grate the site plan with the existing Perry's Farm Market shopping
center and the development of the immediate corner. Through several
meetings and discussions, the site plan was developed to integrate
more closely with the adjacent center and the immediate corner. How-
ever, the Design Review Committee was unable to work out an acceptable
arch itecurai design of the facility with the applicant. This parti-
cular project is a Woolworth Garden Center which is a prototype
building used in all cities which they locate. The Design Review
Committee stated the design proposed is not the style of architecture
desired for Foothill Boulevard as a Special Boulevard, as described
within the General Plan. Although the adjacent shopping center is
in need of significant improvements, the Design Review Committee felt
that this project should set the tone of the development which would
help motivate improvements or new construction of the adjacent center
while also maintaining high design standards for Foothill. Therefore,
the Design Review Committee does not recommend approval of the archi-
tectural design of this development. The applicant did display other
concepts that could be utilized in the architectural design of the
facility which the Design Review Committee felt wnuld provide a better
character. However, the applicant does not desire to develop such
designs and is therefore seeking a decision on the architectural
design from the full Planning Commission. Based upon the Design
Review Committee work and input, staff proposes denial of the project
based upon the findings listed in the attached Resolution.
BACKGROUND: The project proposes to develop approxima'. Ay a 1.9
acre piece of land generally located on the southeast corner of Foothill
Boulevard and Helms Avepi!e (E%iibit "A "). The site is one parcel of
a parcel map which has not yet oeen approved by the Planning Commission
ld is being held pending action if the site plan by the Planning Com-
mission. Attached is a copy of the tentative parcel map that will be
brought before the Planning Commission pending direction on this pro-
posal (Exhibit "C "). The site plan consists mainly of outdoor storage
ITEM I
0
V
i
6
= T-�z
L C'J
O
LL
W
p� v
� G
.V 2
j V C //Cl
.v
6
W 2 Y^
P� 6
9 y C
P p L
d
N Wr
VyQ -
A W •J
V O g 7 L
L O
r N v C
q` =C10
L + °CL
.dJ V L N 0
x L W 0 6
r
O
N T
` C
+� O
C Y
w a
L•�
O �
9
C
a�
u Z
�• 6
�L_Q]
q C L
4
y4
S- 9
W
vv or
W
� a
G Oy
N t. Qi
a T
O V
C d q
Y O
} N
t C u
-c
N u
n r .ti
G V O
Iq
T
n
A
v
W
r
yW
G
S
a
w
L
L
0
1
�I
9
0
u O
O
6 p
p u
N O
W
7
V.
c u
G o
_V
uu c
4 N d L
N J 4 V
CJPt
L C7 P L
l A�
aJ V Pf/� O
QImI VI
0
E
El
0
—
L
Y
.•'•N
C
a Ov
.ra=
Op
CVIJ
Y
4Cd
O:NU
C
p
r
Cul-
•°c.L+
A
^y.N
..a
.w
OTC
v °uA
•O•'
TJ�
J•
LV—
Vq�f
b
vaLL
C
+d
v V V
C
N
CY N
q
q
✓ +�
+
M
V N
4
O
W r
y d fN]
V
Y
u �2�
0.
d
r q T
a
M
L
C V.
�•
O Y
N G Y
V
p A
+ N O
A
L V
AN
CYi
+
+4
�'V+O
47
ON+
W4•v0
b C Q+
N
d
V r W
yT
Y V
tt
L 7 N
- S N p
u
L C
q P+
6 b
q V d
•.. O u
V
W p
a...
N
Y.+.+
q d
T 4 T /•f
c d v
dC W
wgLr
+p
a.0
+LO
OA
d
y�
O O
Y P V
C c
MlL
u d
O � A O
L
n�
'-
WY
O q •r- b
Y P
•� �
L �
6 W C d
o•�r.
V O O
4 W
r C d
.� C
C P•� u
4gY�0
Y.4
66
0.Jtd
4�
JLL•�
E
El
0
0
Staff Report
DR 81 -07
-2-
j;
June 10, 1981
of plant material and contains two buildings with an extensive over-
head trellis structure between the buildings. The site is presently
zoned C -2 and is General Planned for commercial uses. The property
immediately to the east is an existing shopping center; Perry's Farm
Market. West of Hellman is vacant - undeveloped land and south, approxi-
mately 4001, is existing single family residential development.
ANALYSIS; A significant amount of discussion occurred between the
applicant and the Design Review Committee relative to the development
of the immediate corner of Helms and Foothill Boulevard. The Committee
felt that the size of the corner (ZO,000 sq. ft.), which is proposed to
be split off from the larger piece of land would be too small for pro-
per development and integration with the rest of the center. Please
find attached as Exhibit "D" a site plan which indicates a conceptual
arrangement of the building, parking, and circulatior system which the
applicants feel will integrate the corner with the overall development.
The Design Review Committee also had concerns relating to the inte-
gration of this site with the existing shopping center. As a result of
tr!e Design Review Committee's concern, the applicant has arranged to
utilize the existing driveway into the Center rather than creating ad-
ditional access from Foothill Boulevard. No primary access is being
proposed from helms Avenue. Only a service drive is being proposed
from Helms which could be for the delivery plant material.
Attached is the Illustrative Site Plan which indicates the areas pro-
posed to be landscaped as well as the type of screening being proposed
along Helms Avenue. A combination of chainlink fence with wood posts
and a wood cap is proposed along Helms Avenue in combination with
mounding and landscaping. The remainder of the plant storage area is
prod. ,)sed to be enclosed by standard chainlink fence and barbed wire.
The Desig. , Review Committee spent a significant amount of time working
with the applicant to resolve the site plan concerns relative to access
and compatibi'ity with the adjacent center. However, the architectural
design of the facility was not amicably worked out between the Design
Review Committee and the applicant. The Design Review Committee exrressed
concern over the original designs proposed by the applicant and in re-
sponse the applicant prepared some refinements to the design. Also,
additional desig,, concepts that could be utilized with the basic building
structure were prepared by the architect and shown to the Committee. In
review of the other concepts the Committee round them to be more desirable
for Foothill Boulevard than the one desired by the applicant. As in
previous cases along Foothill Boulevard, the Design Review Committee and
the Planning Commission has strived for the quality building designs in
order to promote the Special Boulevard character and policies of the
General Plan. The Design Review Committee contends that the design
desired by the applicant does not meet the Special Boulevard standards
in terms of architectural treatment and would not promote the type and
style that is desired for this location. Because of such, the Design
Review Committee cannot recommend approval of this project with its
11
11
E
Staff Report
DR 81 -07 -3- June 10, 1981
present architectural design. The applicant was provided with the
option of redesigning the project to meet the goals and policies of
the General Plan or ge before the full Planning Commission for a final
determination on the architectural design of the structure.
Because of the applicant's desire not to deviate from the present proto-
type standard design for the Woolworth Garden Center, this item is being
brought before the Planning Commission for their guidance and direction
in the matter. Because the applicant is unwilling to redesign the pro-
ject to conform with Foothill Boulevard and Special Boulevard Standards,
the Design Review Committee and the Staff is recommending denial of the
project based upon the findings listed in the attached Resolution.
Should the Commission vote not to deny the project based upon this design,
then the Planning Commission should provide direction to the applicant
relative to desired design improvements or direct Staff to prepare final
conditions of approval for the development.
If the Commission concurs with the Design Review Committee and denies
the project based upon the findings listed within the Resolution, then
Staff will bring forth the parcel map which would be dividing the pro -
per•ty.to the Planning Commission for final action and recommendation
of denial.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission review
and consider the issues outlined within the Staff Report and any addi-
tional areas which the Commission may find concern. Upon conclusion of
such review, it is recommended that the Planning Commission render a
decision to either deny the project based upon the attached Resolution
or provide the necessary direction for the completion of this project.
i tted ,
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Detailed Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Tentative Parcel Map
Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Site Plan
Exhibit "E" - Conceptual Landscape Plan
Exhibit "F" - Conceptual Grading Plan
Exhibit "G" - Exterior Building Elevations
Resolution of Denial
E
k:'.
N DRTH
CITY OF ITEM: (-a�
RANCHO CUCANIONGA TITLE: L-XATION WE �
PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT:- A SCALE: N � S
E
� 2...
ƒ} $
Ll
I '
-
a
.. «.�......�
&m2 m! q§ §& wva
� f .
� ` |
| ■: / | �'
\\
�
�
2!\l W |s
®I « q# t
. . � \.. .
� \
{ \.
||
$
a ;
!«
Z
oil
IL
• 1111I
v �J
AOL
t
zz
04
4
)
._:
:� -,
y
�
I °�
rot
4i,
�,
E {�
��� 9��dj
I
_
�
all�t��
�:H
� tjsEa ��.
FEi
qq��
ti-�I�[y'I�
env
• 1111I
v �J
AOL
t
zz
04
• 1111I
v �J
SIN 7.7M
y is _ IN"
I AOL
04
4i,
SIN 7.7M
y is _ IN"
I AOL
Ell,
a
t
I
yl 014W
79USOV f4MvW✓
n. I / / / , , -
a
4 .- ,
WAV W.- -
q
4�1
ak
it
iN
n
r,
at gulzouni, COL., a@emlel
n)n
t
1,4 L
�JV�]
L1
l/�
U
1J
� ^nQ
`7
tJ V
�J
I
I
iII
I
�I
0
a
�1�1
a
f�
�J
�
j}
annnn
n
Orto
L
mm
11
-" i.-
MOM
1: ts, 1 1
it � I�
rn
fill
ll
I
Tri�
I
j
-" i.-
MOM
1: ts, 1 1
it � I�
rn
fill
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO (TUCATONGA PLANNING
COMMISSION DENYING DEVFLOP14ENT tEVIEW 140. 81 -07
FOR THE LEVELOPIENT OF A RETAIL GARDEN CENTER ON
1.9 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON Tb-1 SOUTHEAST CORNER
OF HELMS AVE14UE ANL FOOTHILL BOJLEVARD, WITHIN
THE C -2 ZONE.
WHEREAS, on the 6th day of Febtuary, 1981, a complete
application was filed by the Praver Brotlers for review of the above -
describcd project; and,
WHEREAS, on the 10th day of June, 1981, the Rancho Cucamnrga
Planing Couunission held a meeting to consider the above - described
project; and,
WHEREAS, the Design Review Comiittee has reviewed the
project with the applicant and has recom.icnded denial of the above -
described project.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cuc:.monga Planning Commission
resolves as follows:
0 SECTION 1: The above - described project is denied as
presently proposed, based upon the following findings:
1. The design of the proposed development is not consistent
with the architectual desi ^es for Foothill Boulevard.
2. The design of the proposed development does not meet the
Special Boulevard design c•iteria or design objectives
of the General Plan.
3. The design of the proposed development will not be
consistent or compatible with like commercial develop-
ment contemplated by the General Plan, in the immediate
vi.c�inity of the � jec: si(��`
APROVED ANU ADOPTED TI1I9 `i0th D fY OF JUNE, 19* 81.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO :UCAMOt7GA
BY:
Richard Dahl, Chairman
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Planning, Commission
R,er,0111tion No.
Page 2
I, ;JACK LbM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the loth da- of Jur :c, 1981 by the following Planning to—
wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
!`TOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
�0'j
Ell-
- Q..TY OF RANCHO CiJOMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 10, 1981
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Barry r.. Hogan, City Planner
BY: Tim J. Beedle, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: SCHEDULE FOR REVIEW OF INDUSTRIAL_ SPECIFIC PLAN
The Industrial Committee is nearing completion of their review on the
Draft Specific Plan for the Industrial area. It is anticipated that
the Committee will take action to recommend adoption at their meeting
of June 11, .981. The draft documen* along with Industrial Committee
recommendations
review. Accompaningrt"isememo iseaptentativeosc begin
hedule which
theirthe
Commission may wish to consider for their review and adoption of the
Industrial Specific Plan. The schriule includes a study session where
the draft Plan can be presented and discussed in a more informal session.
Two public hearings for consideration and Plan approval are also inrluded.
Following the manning Commission's action, the text will be revised in
accordance with any reeomrenda tions by the Planning Commission and sub-
mitted to the City Council for public review.
June 24, 1981 - Planning Commission study session on the =ndustriai
Specific Plan.
July 8, 1981 - Planning Cemm'Ission review at the p:ablic hearing of
the Draft Industrial Specific Plan.
July 22, 1981 - Planning Commission consideration on recommendation
for adoption of Draft Induatrial Specific Plan and
review of Draft Environmental Report.
RECOMMENDATION: Should the Planning Commission consider this schedule
aceep- tabl4; it is recommended that they adopt this sc :iedule for public
notice.
pectful'A. submitted,
B!4W:TJu:%�
ITEM J
U�. '...
. .
E
IE
CITY OF RANCHO C :MONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 10, 1981
TO: Members of the Planning Cumss'on
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City P1ann
BY: Otto Kroutil, Associate -Pa an er
SUBJECT: ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN /FOR INFORMATION ONLY
Available for you at the meeting will be a copy of a Staff Report to
the City Council, dealing with the preparation of the Etiwanda Specific
Plan. Also available for your comment will be a detailed scope of work
for the Speci, , Plan outlining the various tasks to be accomplished
during the Specific Plan process.
While no action by the Planninj Commission has been requested, your
thoughts and comments on the subject are welcome. The report and scope
of work, along with your comments, will then be forwarded to the City
Council for thtir review and consideration on June 17, 1981.
EKH:OK:kp ,
ITEM L