HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981/07/22 - Agenda PacketIv
A.
M.
w.
t4
A C T 1 0 N S
Continued to
8 -12 -81
Approved 3 -0 -2
a
I
II
III.
IV
V.
rlw
am
CITY OF
RAI*-X110 CUCArvloNCA.
PLANNING -COMMISSION
AGENDA
WEDNESDAY JULY 22, 1981 7:00 P.M.
LION'S PARK COMMUNITY CENTER
9161 BASE LINE,-RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
Pledge of Allegiance
Roll Call
Commissioner Dahl X Commissioner Rempel X
Commissioner King Excused Commissioner Tolstoy =used
Commissioner Sceranka X
Approval of Minutes
February 5, 1981
Announcements
Consent Calendar
The following consent calendar items are expected to be
routine and non- controversia?. They will be acted upon
by the Commission at one time without discussion. If
anyone has concern over any item, then it should be
removed for discussion.
- ,,.......A —j - „ uevviopmeni oT two indL:;triai buildings
totaling 86,=64 square feet an 5.27 acres of land in the M -2
zone to be located on the northeast corr.sr of Jersey Blvd.
and Vincent Avenue - APN 209 - 141 -42
Public Hearings
The following items are public heazings in which concerned
individuals may voice their, opinion of the related project.
Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address
the Commission from the public microphone by giving your
name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to
r9 minutes per individual for each project.
Planning Commission Agenda -2- July 22, 1981
Continued to 8 -12 -81
B. VARIANCE NO. 81 -02 - CHRISTIAN.- Request to permit
construction of residence that will encroach into
front and rear yards on a 3.532 sq. ft. lot in the
R -3 zone located at 6969 Amethyst - APN 202- 131 -04
Approved 3 -0 -2 with
recommendation that
C. RFC /IEW THE DRAEL-- J, -L-AND rnN$InER APPRQM (TF THE DRAFT
City Council adopt
INOUSTP,IAL SPECj}IC PLAN WITH REVI;ION4 - The Specific
Plan consists of detailed land use regulations and
El
standards for development in the Industrial Area. Public
hearing will be held to take public comment on the Draft
Environmental Impact Report and consider recommendation
I or adoption of the Draft Industrial Specific Plan with
any necessary revisions.
Approved 3 -0 -2
n, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 9658 - McCUTCHAN
total residential eve opment of 25 jots cons.�_t ng of -
single family residential dwelling units arranged as duplexes
on 6.92 acres of land in the R -2 zone on the north side of 9th
Street, between Raker ant. Maarvra Ave. APN 207- 251 -03
Approved 2 -1 -2
E. DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 79 -68 - LEWIS PROPERTIES - The Plannino
Commission shalt be considering a change in the Conditions -
of Approval for the development of a professional center to
include a two -story office building totaling 33,696 sq. ft...
and a bank totaling 7,500 sq. ft. in the C -1 zone located on
the north side of Base Line, west of Archibald Avenue - APN
202- 161 -32
Approved 3 -0 -2
F 'nEEEVA EAR - (Reference Tentative Tract 11550 and Zone Change
No. P0-11) - Consideration and review of an Environmental
Impact Report (EAR) prepared for a residential condominium
project consistir:g of 662 dwelling units on 65 acres of land
generally located or, the south side of Wil ;on, about k mile
east of Haven - APN 201- 191 -07
VII.
Old Business
G. RESOLUTION
Continued ,- .,., ,.
VIII. New Business
Approved 3 -0 -2 with H. RESOLUTION ON EQUESTR1r.N ADVISORY COMMITTEE STANDARDS
amendment to have
City Council select °
its own member
I• VACATION OF 7TH STREET AT CENTER
I. Approved 3 -0 -2 IX. Council Referrals
J. REPORT ON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (Addition to Agenda)
c� «TY OF
f"A p RANCHO CUCAMONGA
_ '= PLANNING C®MMISSI ®N
AGE, ND
WEDNESDAY JULY 22, 1981 7:00 P.M.
LION'S PARK. COMMUNITY CENTER
9161 BASE LINE,.RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
1. Fledge of Allegiance
II. Roll Call
Commissioner Dahl Commissioner Rempel
Commissioner King Commissioner Tolstoy
Commissioner Sceranka
III. Approval of Minutes
February 5, 1981 `• Lp� ? ;ft7 �"�
IV. Announcements
V. Consent Calendar
The following consent calendar items are expected to be
routine and non- ccntroversia2. They will be acted upon
by the Commission at one time without discussion. If
anyone has concern over any item, then it should be
removed for discussion.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOWNT RFVTFW Nn. Ri -'
u.n•u- „�w�in� w - n ueveiupmeuT oT Two inoustriai euifaings
totaling. 86,564 square feet cn 5.27 arses or land in the M -2
zone to be located on the northeast corner of Jersey Blvd.
and Vincent Avenue - APN 209 - 141 -42
_:.
VI.
Public Hearings
The following items are public hearings in which concerned
individuals may voice their opinion of the related project.
Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address
the Commission from the public microphone by giving your
name and address. A21 such opinions shall be limited to
5 minutes per Individual for each project.
lhCr
� �
UU �
'I
b 5_4 e�
am- �
G-�
l
Planning Commission Agenda
All
7EM
L
� ifll.
VII
-2- July 22, 1981
B. VARIANCE NO. 81 -02 - CHRISTIAN - Request to permit
construction of residence that will encroach into
front and rear yards on a 3.532 sq. ft. lot in the
R-3 zone located at 6969 Amethyst - APN 202 - 131 -04
C. REVIEW THE DRAE'LE_ I _ R.. ANg_C.QNSIDFBr9P ' DRAFT
MM"L p F P {,Qpy�+IT' �yjSiONS - he Specific
Piad consists of detailed land use regulations and
standards for development in the Industrial Area. Public
hearing will be held to take public comment on the Draft
Environmental Impact Report and consider recommendation
for adoption of the Draft Industrial Specific Plan .with,
any necessary revisions.
n. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 10.10 TENTATIVE TRACT WAO - McCUTCHAN
A totat resloentlat development of zF sots consisting of 5z
single family residential dwelling units arranged as duplexes
on 6.92 acres of land in the R -2 zone on the north side of 9th
Street, between Raker and MaOrone Ave. APN 207 - 251 -03
DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 7948 - LEWIS PROPERTIES — The Planning
lamm ssion shall-be considering a change in the Conditions
of Approval for the development of a professional center tom,,
include a two -story office building totaling 33,696 sq. ft.
and a bank totaling 7,500 sq. ft. in the C -1 zone located on
the north side of Base Line, west of Archibald Avenue - APN
202 - 161 -32
F NEEVA EIR - (Reference Tentative Tract 11550 and Tone Change
No. 80 -11) - Consideration and review of an Environmental
Impact Report (EIR) prepared for a residential condominium
project consisting of 662 dwelling units on 65 acres of land
generally located on the south side of Wilson, about 11 mile
east of Haven - APN 201 - 191 -07
Old Business
G. RESOLUTI,
FAMILY A'
New Business
H.
RESOLUTION ON EQUESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE' STANDARDS
VACATION OF 7TH STREET AT CENTER
Ix. Council Referrals
III
Rio
AOL
E
Punning Commission Agenda
-3- July 22, 1981
X. Director's Reports
XI. Public Comments
This is the time and place for the general public to address
the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do
not already appear on this agenda.
XII. Upcomong Agenda
XIII. Adjournment
The planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations
that set an 12:00 p.m_ adjournment time. Yf items go beyond
that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the
Commission.
E
r
>j
E
, . I .,
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA140NGA
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Adjourned Regular Meeting
February 5, 1981
CALL TO ORDER
Vice- chairzc -in, Jeff Sceranka, called the adjourned regular City of
Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission meeting. held at the Lion's Park
Community Centel, 5161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, to order at
7:07 p.m. r- ollcm;ing the call to order, Vice- chairman, Sceranka led the
pledge to the flag.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: Jeffrey King, Herman Rempel, Peter Tolstoy,
Jeff Sceranka
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Richard Dahl (Excused)
STAFF PRESENT: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner; Ted Hopson, City Attorney;
Joan Kruse, Secretary; Jack Lam, Director of Community
Development
Mr. Lam, Director of Community Development, explained the agenda stating
that the EIR for the Victoria Project had been continued from the previous
meeting of February 2, 1981. He then went into a recap of the Victoria
Plan to date. He also explained that because the General Plan has progressed,
it was now possible to gc on with the Victoria Planned Community 'searing.
Mr. Hogan, City Planner, provided background for the discussion explaining
that this agenda is a compilation of reports that had been prepared for
the Planning Commission's review. Mr. Hogan followed with a recap of
the staff reports relative to land use. circulation, parks and open space.
Commissioner Sceranka asked if there was a preference by the Commission to
go on to the next section or deal with this section before they go on
to another.
Commissioner king asked Mr. Hogan to discuss the adjustments made to
density.
Mr. Hogan replied that there were changes to the boundary in the Planned
Community area resulting in a reduction of units from 98 ?O to 8924. The
total acres of residential were changed from 1035 to 851 -. Mr. Hogan
indicated that the area near the Pacific Electric Railroad, Flood Control
Channel, lumber yard, and the area south of Base ".ine would have to be
adju,:ted.
Commissioner King stated that because of boundary changes density has
been reduced. He wanted to know how much more was the result of Ceneral
Plar. changes and asked for an estimate.
1.
Mr. Hogan replied that he could. not give him an estimate at the moment
but could get the figures for him.
Commissicner Tolstoy also asked for these figures. Further, he thought
it would be good to have them broken out of the total.
Vice - chairman Sceranka opened the public hearing.
Mr. John Scheib, representing the Myohoji Temple, stated that prior to
the cessation of meetings in November, it had been planned that they
would be meeting with the applicant. He indicated that they had met and
th--rc :.e-e n _ X,en.,!es of approach to learri_ng the Temple area spared of
traffic and noise encroachment resulting from this development. He
restated the necessity for a perimeter road, and careful st+mdy of its
placement because of the eucalyptus trees along the west boundary. He
also indicated that perimeter landscaping would be necessary. Mr.
Scheib asked what the uses would be under the regional - related category
and how land development would affect the Temple. He stated that although
he is interested in the perimeter question his main concern was the west
perimeter.
Mr. John Lyons, 11984 Dorset, Stiwanda, stated that his concern is that
Rochester will be opened through to Church. He further stated that
people living in this area would not like to see this happen.
Mr. Gary Frye, 9613 Arrow Hwy., Rancho Cucamongp, stated that it was
their intention to come back on the 26th of February to clarify those
areas relative to land use and did not have comments on these areas
specifically at this time. Mr. Frye commented that he felt the question
on regional- -elated uses was one of clarification, not so much on what
these uses would be, but rather, on traffic management for this use. He
felt that this would be done and asked what kind of detail staff wants
them to come back with on regional - related uses.
He indicated that the portion of the E1R that deals with regional -
related uses could be found on pages 154 -156 and if more was wanted he
felt that it could be related to traffic. He asked for clarification on
this point.
Mr. Frye also asked for clarification on the buffering along Base Liuc
Road relative to conmiercial uses and stated that he was not sure they
could stipulate how that property will be after development.
He talked about the Planned Community boundary map and the change of
designation of land use east of Victoria Parkway. He stated that they
will come back on the treatment of Highland Avenue but indicated that
they felt it would be given a rural flavor.
Mr. Lam commented on Base Line Road indicating that there should probably
be some adjustment on the higher density there. Further, that there was
a question on whether the density on Ctiwanda Avenue would affect Base Line
and asked if the Planning Commission was still interested in seeing the
lay out along Base Line.
Planning Commission Minutes -2- February 5, 1981
E
I.]
13
Mr. Hogan indicated his concern with how design uses along Base Line would
coincide with the design if the commercial center.
Commissioner Tolstoy stated he felt that the design would be dictated
by the planned community standards, even if it was not in the planned
community. He indicated that the commercial center along Victoria Parkway
could be designed to have a rural. armosphere and thought that would be
an excellent theme.
Commissioner King stated that he did not agree with Commissiorer Tolstoy
on both pcint%a. He felt that on both Etiwanda and Base Line it was un-
necessary to sae what treatment would be given at this point in time.
Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he could not imagine failing to look at how
things occur right outside of the Victoria Planned Community boundary.
Further, that even if the Planning Commission is rot obliged at this point
to look at the perimeter, they should be.
Commissioner Rempel stated that he was in agreement with Commissioner Ring;
however, he stated that some kind of design has to be blocked out. On
the shopping center, he felt that a theme design should be submitted and
it would be well fol: the Planning Commission to make some plan to see how
ideas are going.
Mr.. Lam asked if what the Commission meant was some graphic displays to
see how certain design elements could be transition.ed.
Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he thought it would be important to
see how it would relate to the planned community especially along
Base Line. He further stated that a new character is being assigned
to Base Line and the Commission needs to see what they are doing to it.
Commissioner Sceranka stated that pages 180 -181 show vignettes and how
density relates and translates. He thought that Mr. Frye could point
out other vignettes.
Mr. Hogan stated that pages 79 -83 have an illustrative concept plan in
detail and that page 83 is a more simplistic version for the commercial
center.
Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he would like to see a typical perspective
as you would then know what you are going to get. if the design was not
coming through, they could then tell the applicant to rethink it. He
indicated that it would be important to nave Day Creek Boulevard, Highland,
Base Line, and Foothill done and that all these areas were not included.
Commissioner Sceranka asked, if in terms of Day Creek, the commission was
looking at the edge treatment and exterior of the projert.
Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he was interested In the exterior edges
along Day Creek Boulevard, Milliken and Base Line.
Planning Commission Minutes -3- February 5, 1981
Mr. Hogan stated that this would give the Commission an idea of what_
the buildings would look like with design and landscaping.
Commissioner Tolstoy . agreed and stated that it would nave to be to
scale.
Mr. Frye stated that they would be happy to accommodate the Planning
Commission. He then spoke about the land use and zoning. He indicated
that there are some things within the regional center that could change
depending on the development all around it. Further., that he did not
want to spend a lot of time and money today on something now that still
had the possibility of changing. Mr. Frye stated that they would in-
corporate a theme in the text to conform to whatever the Planning
Commission desired.
On pages 158 -152, Mr. Frye stated that he wanted to establish concurrence
in landscaping approach and what trees would be used internally and
externally.
Mr. Frye spoke about the entrance treatment that would allow people
to know they were making a transition into Victoria, ae they go along
the street.
Commissioner Tolstoy stated that it really doesn't show what the character
would be along the street and does not relate to how it would transition.
Mr. Frye replied that it would depend on who develops first along
Base Line and part of the answer is on Page 157.
Commissioner Sr_eranka stated that he had a serious question about
going into the plan in det .,il. He stated that he is having trouble
with getting into that level. of detail at this time.
Commissioner Rempel stated that Mr. Frye has no control over the last
1000' along Base Line and so can really show it.
Mr. Frye stated that this would almost be like a site plan review.
Commissioner Tolstoy asked if he could make one more stab and stated that
you don't have control over the last 1600 feet, but what if someone
comes in and says he would like to develop it. When the Planning
Commission reviews the plan they need to see if it will properly
relate.
Mr. Don Tomkins of SWA stated that if the Commission was concerned
with an inconsistency gap, that might be a problem. If the two planned
areas are consistent, the Commission should be able to get detail
and specifics in the treatment that will be used.
Mr. Frye asked if Commissioner Tolstoy was looking at specific plans
and material.
Planning Commisson Minutes -4- February 5, 1?81
E
E
ri
F7' I
LJ
Commissioner Tolstoy replied that he was pretty sure it would be this
way but was concerned with block walls, mounding or columnar type
walls.
Mr. Hogan asked Commissioner Tolstoy to look at page 139 to see if
that is what he wanted.
Commissioner Tolstoy replied that this is wl•at he wanted because you
can then look to what proposal is being submitted to see how it will
match.
Mr. Frye stated that it will not be effective in this planned community
but should go into the Etiwanda Specific Plan.
There was further discussion relative to the edge condition and how
this would follow along Etiwanda Avenue, Base Line and that intersect;on.
Mr. Hogan went into the circula ".on portion of the Victoria Planned
Community and reviewed the four items that were presented in the staff
report. Pe discussed the "A" land uses and looped streets stating that
this could be resolved through more illustrative planning.
Commissioner King stated that he had a couple of additions --- the Church
Street aspect and his concern with Day Creek Boulc.ard at the i_ntersectton
of Foothill Boulevard. He stated that he wished to have this issue
addressed.
Mr.. Hogan replied that the City Engineer, in a previous report, had
indicated that this area needs to be looked at further through more
detailed studies.
Commissioner Sceranka stated that he would like to see the type and
traffic flow from the project to the rest of the community. Further,
that them: has been a lot of discussion about work traffic, etc. and
felt that the outlying areas also needed to be addressed.
Commissioner Tolstoy hoped that we have made a commitment on Etiwanda
Avenue and that there was a need to know how traffic thr..re will be
handled along the east side.
Commissioner Sceranka expressed his concern about the impact of traffic
both on the east and west side of Etiwanda Avenue and alonk Ease Line.
Mr. John Lyons came forward and asked about the corner of Rochester
and Foothill. He wanted to know if a traffic signal could be installed
there. He reiterated that he was against opening Church Street to
Rochester but that if it was, he hoped that it would become a signalized
inr_er &ection.
Vice- chairman Sceranka asked that Mr. Lyons meet and discuss this with
City Staff.
Planning Commission Minutes -5-
February 5, 1981
Commissioner Tolstoy asked if in light of all the Ciscussion on Church
Street traversing the Fochester Tract, if it would be appropriate to
discuss this at this time.
Mr.. Kogan stated that they will come back to this issue.
8:25 p.m. The Planning Commission recessed.
8:35 p.m. The Planning Commission reconvened.
Mr. Hogan reviewed the Parks and Open Space section of the Victoria.
Planned Community as set forth in the staff. report.
Mr. I.am added to this review wit1n philosophical questions to be resolved
such as does the lake edge belong to only those people living adjacent
to it or to the entire community.
Commissioner King stated that he would like to know huw density reduction
relates to parks. He felt that there needed to be some discussion of
the deficiency and whether it is better to have community open space
to combine it with other areas for a larger total area.
Mr. Hogan stated that perhaps this is a philosophical discussion where
you would have development credit for certain amenities. The credit,
Mr. Hogan stated, is issued only after the developer has provided land
or a fee.
Mr. Hopson stated he thought Mr. King was asking if you change to reflect
clustering or do you spread it out to an open area.
Mr. Lam replied that this is something that this is a value judgement that
the Planning Commission has to answer.
Commissioner Tolstoy asked if the lake front was thought to be for
use of people within the City or just the Planned Community,
Mr. Lam stated that from r:%e very beginning, staff considered the lakes
for the residents of the .:tire City.
Commissioner Tolstoy stated that it adds an amenity for people all over
the City to enjoy and that tht. ' don't need teete, totters or swings
because just walking around the lake would be a treat. Further, that
picnic tables and the like would be encouraged as recreational uses
in this area.
Commissioner Rempel agreed.
Commissioner Sceranka stated that the issue of swimming in the lake
also needed to be addressed and cited the way the City of Woodbridge
developed such an area.
Planning Commission Minutes -6- February 5, 1981
E
Mr. Frye stated that they will come back with answers to the areas
and questions raised by the Commission. He further stated that he agreed
with Barry Hogan relative to the specil..-q and felt that more time
needed to be spent on parks. He stated that they would prefer to come
back with these answers on March 12.
Mr. Hogan st :ed that infrastructure and design must also be reviewed.
Commissioner Tolstoy asked about a timetable for development.
Mr_ Nnonn rPn_l.ied that there is a schedule for phasing contained within
the text.
Commissioner Tolstoy asked if the lakes ar.9 the village is built how
much of Victoria Parkway will be built.
Mr. Hogan replied that there will be conditions that will be included
prior to submittal of the Planned Community to the City Council for approval.
which will detail these requirements. Further, staff would not like
to see only residential development going in without the parks being
built. He stated that a phasing plan must be worked out for this and
other amenities within the project.
Mr. Hogan stated that the Commission will be provided with a detailed
review and total picture of the Victoria Planned Community. Mr. Hogan
then stated that February 26 ivas beer set for another meeting where answers
and exhibits will be provided for those areas discussed at this meeting
with the exception of Vie parks and open space areas. March 12 has
been set for a meeting to discuss parks and open space infrastructure and
design criteria with March 26 set to discuss regulations and implementation
and the EIR. He indicated that if everything proceeds on schedule, April
9th would conceivably be the time when the project is recommended to the
..I Council £..r their action. Mr. Hogan further stated that February 17
was scheduled for the last General Plan meeting with_a recommendation
to the City Counc *.1 from the Planning Commission.
Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Tal.stoy carried unanimously, to
adopt the date- for the various meetings as proposed by Mr. Hogan.
GENERAL PLAN - E.I.R.
Mr. Hogan stated that a matrix had been prepared from the EIR for second
portion of the February 9 meeting. He explained how mitigation measures
would be _nr_orporated within the EIR and }•ave examples of development,
run off, and percolation.
Mr. Hogan then explained the SCAG 208 program, the federal requirements,
and the standards which have been s %t to guarantee quality of water
for this area_
Planning Commission Minutes -7- February S, 1981
t is
r,
Commissioner Tolstoy stated that when this :ommunity was originally
formed it was primarily an agricultural connuaity which now has a
new use. He further stated that the EIR w:to written to those problems
that occurred in thz transition from. farmirg to an urban area. Mr. Tolstcy
stated further that an EIR should not be written to meet the letter
of the law and then to be put on a shelf atd forgotten. He indicated
that it needs to be read again and to be k,:pt before the City Council,
Community and Planning Con-- nission to be sure that something will be done
about it. He felt that one of the first t',ings that must be addressed
is keeping the mitigating factors b_fore t'',e Planning Commission..
the EIR is a good design tool.. He further indicated that what makes this
EIR different than others is that it relies heavily on the General Plan
text and the problem areas are mitigated through the text.
Commi ,zsioner Tolstoy stated that he felt portion of the staff report
should address this as projects come before the Commission.
City Attorney Hopson stated that this is really a funciton of staff.
Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he did nct want to lose the import of
what the EIR was saying in the years ahead.
Mr. Hogan stated that the way to retain thLs is through creative, innovative
use of the Zoning Ordinance in order to protect the City in three Areas.
Further, that i-I the EIR is not going to bit used, it should not be in
the General Plan. He indicated that this :.s a. general EIR for the whole
City and perhaps at some future time specific EIRs may be required to
develop more information for certain areas and suggested that focused
EIRs could be used for this purpose.
Commissioner Sceranka stated that the mcst significant issue :,a the
sociological impact on the City that is bei.ig proposed by the General Plan
inasmuch as the City is coming out of the agricultural pattern of the
past into a urbanized community. Further, .hat dur "ng the past 3 -4
years there have been tremendous pattern changes in the sociological
aspects of the community that have had a ne;;ative effect. Commissioner
Sceranka stated that it is e&sy to sit on tle Planning Commission and
discuss residential., industrial areas, the affordability of housing and
rationalize these issues, but it does not mitigate the emotional and
psychological impacts on their life styles. Further, that what the
Planning Commission is saying is that growth is inevirable.
Commissioner Sceranka indicated that there i; a need to address the impacts
that occur with further growth and densities. He felt that these issues
are not adequately addressed and stated that he would like to see more
serious emphasis on this.
Planning Commission M.nutes -8- February 5, 1981
Ll
utW. 111. 0111.1 '1 ./
.11 111 I 1•11IA •'u1`
1 111 1 /,.,1 , ❑IIMI 1
.1nnl.l. 4.4 . I , IM.1 $,$Bill 1
111 1.1'• 1 ill I'NIMM .' 4:'
I 1 Iwi ..I 1111111w. 11111
111' , 4 1
IINNI /�1 UIN i, 1 .1't.1rl .
/•1 �1.1 1/ NIp.1 '71!1111 N.!
1 . u. .M 1gM41.1.1 .111 I.
1 ❑qNJ .111 ' 1.111.; 1q •1•
1•IdJ n/ ItlaH.l 1•''
'.IM,n•I , 1 i „111 � 1N' .111. 1
ul.l ..1�Lb1 UI .• $,, 1'•
1111 11111. 14 .1040$1 1.1 .
1.1.1. • 1
.nNW. 1'1 •.Itl 1 11.1 /IINN
1 .N... /.1 1.•.111 - '
411 .till I . .1 1 .,, 11 .., 1
Ili :11 1'. ....1.1 •' d•1 f I,1.
UI•, 1.1 • h1 rlll.l M•. tl 1.
11 IU 611 IW • 1''
,,•.. ♦•It1 , .0 1 1
11 1.. L1 oill 'IM 6I40
al.. X11 -'N ,.u1• .1
1 4"m , .1 IM ';111
I l
4,1 1.1 1 .I . - . ,
iLated his agreement with Commiosioner Sceranka
felt that these areas have been addressed. He
Catmnission hears an issue that is somewhat con -
leople from the community to the hearing, the
and the issue because their concerns are mitigated.
recent hearing involving a church, the Rcberts
Etiwanda area addressed ir. the General Plan
ated that as a result of the Etiwanda hearings,
around the Victoria project. Further, that the
been sensitive to the concerns of the residents
progress affects them. He indicated that he
ission would remember the EIR and know what the
these and do their own mitigating on the issues.
ted that the concerns of the community are being
comes before the Planning Commission and that
is conc,:zned and addresses the sociological
_ated that when you speak of the rural character
and traffic, school impaction and protection of
aching on an area that a lot of people think
hanging. He indicated that many don't think this
the Planning Commission doesn't need to put
s and he knows that he must say to them that these
must be accepted and that this dues have an
cummunity. Further, that it doesn't matter
Commission is or what the justifications are, it
:)mrtunity helps in providing as much information
aking the correct decisions.
t item can be added to the EIR. He indicated
•n is talking about is outside the physical impact
11' 014' 101 .40401 14 did not think it appropriate to go into the
I • 1 ' 1.1 . ill .• for is it required legally.
11.. .. ,N „ , • ''.1 1
d tb:Ie from a practical standpoint what they are
x.10^ • 1 I.I.Li $ .11 t ,
r:'tsons come before the Commission is to create
111 11) ul IJ.1 !• / INII
attempt to minimizes the culture shock. He
;,s is the whole purpose of what the process is about.
., 111 1 .1 •. 1 .
ated that this does not address noise and he does
,+ 111 -ion. Further, that perhaps the EIR should he
he minimum legal requirements are met.
4M11 , 1 1.1 14''11111 , ted that you cannot address every person in
1 . Ir1M,l.ln 1M .acated that there are general terms and this is
.4694 vl .IIwI1l 4.1 1 lot trying to answer.
,.nt . IM 1111,1 ..1 ,., 4 )utes -9- February 5, 1981
There being no further comments, the public portion was closed.
Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Tolstoy, carried unanimously,
to adjourn to February 9, 1981.. .
9:50 p.m. The Planning Commission adjourned.
Respectfully submitted,
JACK. LAM, Secretary
Planning Commission Minutes
-10-
February 5, 1981
E
11
L1
E
DATE
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
July 22, 1981
Members of the Planning Commission
Jack Lam, Director of Community Development
Dan Coleman, Assistant Planner
NO. 81-
U.W.U. H17U /4JJ V1r1A1GJ — /ti a,cvc+v p+wc!•o- v. .. w.. -.
buildings totaling 86,564 sq. ft. on 5.27 acres of land
in the M -2 zone to be located on the northeast corner of
Jersey Blvd. and Vincent Avenue - APN 209 - 141 -42
ABSTRACT: The applicant is requesting review and approval and development
of two industrial warehouse buildings as described above. The project has
completed the development and design review process and is now before the
Planning Commission for environmental review. Staff is recommending issuance
of a Negative Declaration.
BACKGROUND: This review is for environmental assessment to determine the
significant adverse impacts on the environment as a result of this project.
The site and architectural design is not considered at this time unless it
is related to environmental concerns. To determine significant_ adverse
impacts, an Initial Study on envirommental concerns is prepared. Upon com-
pletion of that study, evidence would indicate either no significant impacts
or the potential for significant impacts. If a determination of no signi.•
ficant impacts is made based upon the Initial Study, then a Negative Declaration
may be issued for the project. If significant impacts are found, then an
Environmental Impact Report shall be required to fully analyze impacts of the
project.
The detailed Site Plan and elevations will be reviewed and approved with
�nnditions by the City Planner, contingent upon approval of the Negative
Declaration by the Planning Commission.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: Part i of the Initial Study has been completed by
the applicant and is attached for your review and consideration. Staff has
completed Part II of the Environmental Assessment and has found no significant
adverse impacts on the environment as a result of this project.
RECOMMENDATION: Based upon analysis of the Environmental Study, it appears
that the project %ill not cause significant ;adverse impacts upon the environ-
ment. If the Commission concurs, then the issuance of a Negative Declaration
for the project would be in order.
JL:DC:rd
Attach.
I : EM A
"Ell I
1
NTM�
I1�
I -
w Z72-
Z•
w
t •1ti�.[MNM,4
BUILDING A :.
EXISTING FACILITY.
BUILDING B
I
1 JCRSEV M.VD.
CITY OF
46 RANCHO CC'C'ATMONGA
PLANNIN G DIN'ISIO`1
NORTH
ITEM: ' p
TITLE: ����
EXHIBIT- SCALE: '°
Z
z� t=
ywY. Ct
}: Ir
I�
`V•
9 Y\qyI
z
BUILDING A
EXISTING FACILITY
BUILDING B
r JERSEYULw. 17
i Lam,...•.....
,' •I � I'uK Ww..pw i��A�MYMwv �
Il
G
NORTH
11
CITY OF ITEA1: �i1 6102'
RANCHO CUC`Ai��IO \•GA TITLE: _ istars pAA _ �
PLANNING DIVISION EXI'1IBM _4_ SCALE-
L-111
G
NORTH
0
EAST
SOUTH
WEST
BUILDING A
CITY OF
RANCHO CUGkNT 10NGA
PLANNING DIVISI N
TITLE- _
EXHIBIT: -0 SCALE=
NORTH
El
�t`A}O�� : `jl►:s flan. inaS IoCL°h dG°V�SN� /'!
1 NORTH
CITY OF ITEM: �� 191&v 6r l
AL #Asd
RANCHO CUCANIONGA TITLE G
PLANNING IDIVIS10N EXHIBIT: _ f— SCALE:
11
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
INITIAL STUDY
PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant
Environmental P.ssessment Review Fee: $60.00
For all projects requiring environmental review, this
form must be completed and submitted to the Development
Review Committee through the department where the
project application is made. Upon receipt of this
application, the Environmental Analysis staff will rrepare
Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review
Committee will meet and te1ke action no later than ten
(10) day%.before the public meeting at which time the
project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of
three determinations: 1) The project will have no
environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be
filed, 2) The project will :have an environmental impact
and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or
3) An additional information report should be supplied
by the applicant giving further information concerning
the proposed project.
PROJECT TITLE: Cronin Industrial
APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE:
NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED
CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: don Lundstrom (same)
LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.)
iin„(y(j 1pr_sey Rlvd Ctcamona,a CA 91740 _
AP 209 - 141 -42
LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND
FEDERAL AGENCIES A'&M THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS:
None
I -1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Two
ore as an addition to the exist n,
L]
It -up industrial buildings;
all ronting on Jersey blvd.
ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF �Y.ISTING AND
PROPOSED BUILDINGSr IF ANY: 5.27 acres on site - 2II 025 sq.ft.
exist4ng w/ 24,030 sq.ft. addition plus 6 ,534 square eet In a sep-
_ara p strurturp TataL 86-,5645q-ft- New _
DESCRIBE THE EWYT.RO`ITM1^7TAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE
INCLUDING INFORN,ATION ON TOPOGRAPIiY, PLANTS (TPXES) ,
ANIMALS, ANY Ct71LTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC .'ASPECTS, USE
OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AIM THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY
EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS):
fiat topography w /approx. 4 ft. of fall from the Northerly property
Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series*
of cumulative actions, which althc individually small,
may as a whole have significant envi- orriental impact?
1Jo
13
El
11
WILL TI3IS PROJECT:
YES hO
X 1. Create a substantial change in ground
!- contours?
_ X 2. Create a substantial change in existing
noise or vibration!
X 3_ Create a substantial change in demand for
municipal services (police, fire, water,
sewage, etc.)!
X Q. create changes in the existing zoning or
general plan designations:
_ X 5: Remove any existing trees? How many?
X 6. Create the need for use or disposa*. of
potentially hazardous materials such as
toxic substances, fla:nmables or explosives?
Explanation of any YES answers above:
IMPJRTaNT: If the project_ involves the construction of
residential units, complete the form on the
next page.
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished
above and in the attached exhibits present-the data and
information required for this initial evaluation to the
best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and
information presented are true and correct to the best of
my *knowledge and belief. I further understand that
additional information may be required to be submitted
before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Development
Review Committee.
Signatures ����
Date _
Title YIC17 ZOV&S eNT
T_3
1
0
L3
ra;
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
July 22, 1981
Members of the Planning Commission
Jack �_am, Director of Community Development
Michael Vairin, Senior Planner
VARIANCE NO. 81 -02 - CHRISTIAN - Request to permit con-
struction of residence that will encroach into front and
rear yards on 3.532 sq. ft. lot in the R -3 zone, located
at 6969 Amethyst - APN 202- 131 -04
BACKGROUND: This request was continued from the Planning Commission
meeting of July 8, 1961, to determine the legality of the lot. To date,
we have not been able to attain this information. We will try to have
the information available by the meeting. Please find attached a copy
of the original Staff Report.
Respectfully ,sub tied,
1 Z
JACK LAM, Director of
Community Development
JL:MV:cd
Attachment
ITEM 8
Ll
E
El
C
CITY oF' RANCHo Cu6woNGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 8, 1981
TO: Members of the Planning Cmv.ission
FROM: Barry R. Hogan, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: VARIANCE NO. 81 -02 - CHRISTIAN - Request to construct
res— icence that will encroach into front and rear yards
on a 3,281 square foot lot in the R -3 zone located at
6969 Amethyst - APN 262- 131 -04
ABSTRACT: This item was continued from the June 24, 1981 agerila to
all oow t'he applicant time to resolve problems with this request. Re-
vised plans have been submitted and reviewed by Staff in accordance
with the Zoning Ordinance Standards. Staff has provided a detailed
analysis contained within this report and is recommending approval
of the variance based upon the findings listed in the attached Reso-
iutiop.
BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting approval for a variance on
the ront and rear yard setbacks for a legal substandard size lot
lor.ated at 6969 Amethyst Avenue, on the corner of Monte Vista Street
(E.,hibit "A "). The applicant previously demolished and removed a
delaoidated structure from this property with the intention of con-
structing a new residence. The applicant has submitted construction
drawings to the Building and Safety Division which indicate a proposed
two story residence as shown on Exhibit "C ".
The Zoning Ordinance requires a 25' front yard setback and a 20'
rear yard setback for property in this zone. The applicant is
requesting a 9' variance in the front yard setback and a 12' vari-
ance in the rear yard setback. Therefore, should the Planning Com-
mission approve the variance, the residence would be 16' from the
public right -of -way on Monte Vista Street and 8' from the rear set-
back line, as indicated on Exhibit "B ". The applicant's basis Fir
requesting the variance is based upon the substandard lot size and
configuration that is approximately 35' less than the minimum now
required in the R -3 zone.
ITEM C
D
El
r"
Variance No. 81 -02
July 8, 1981
Page Two
ANALYSIS: Although the proposed variance, if approved as requester.,
wou result in the construction of a residence 8' From the rear prop-
erty line, which is the side lot line for the property to the north,
the existing residence to the north is approximat2l,y 15 to 20 feet
from the subject property line. Therefore the result would be a
separation between the two residences of 25 to 30 feet. Considerat'on
should be given to the fact that the subject property is a 3,281 sgaare
foot lot, whereas the R -3 zone has a minimum lot size of 8,000 sque6e
feet. Additionally, although the Zoning Ordinance now requires a 2)'
rear yard setback, the County Code required only a 10' rear yard set-
back in the R -3 zone which is consistent with most of the dwelling
units constructed in the immediate vicinity along Monte Vista Street.
The front yard setback reduction to 16' would not be inconsistent
with the setbacks found on other lots within the area under similar
circumstances.
Variances may E,! granted by the Planning Commission for certain devel-
opment standar -s only when, because of special circumstances applicrble
to the property such as size, shape, topography, location or surrourdings,
the strict interpretation and application of the Zoning Ordinance would
deprive such property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the
vicinity and Lndcr identical zoning classification. Therefore, variances
may be granted when the strict enforcement of the Zoning Ordinance would
result in practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship inconsistent -with
the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance. After review of this request,
Staff finds that the proposed variance is consistent with the intent
Of the Zoning Ordinance and would not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, and general welfare of the community or the surrounding area.
CORRESPONLENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing and
notices aF ve men mailed to property owners within 300' of the subject
property. To date, no correspondence has been received for or against
this project.
1 PIw g11.iM
IN low UIN' _ 16 +
% *d,i All ttl +iW
1 "n4 s 4114 1!' ''
�11441i
Idtl14�� "IM � i•IIIMr+ "•Ail .
g1,lil�l +1 •u11IIN)
i fw uuWd
1411.0111
commended that the Planning Commission conduct
der all public input. If the Commission concurs
'f, hen the adoption of the attached Resolution
.Ibi* "A" - Locat)cn Map
1 ••ai iwA.i,' f — xhibit "B" - Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Elevation
Resolution of Approval
I
Ll
11
7
l
crrx or-
RANCHO CUCATMONGA
PLANNING DIVISION
NURTH
ITEM: JIB `P�, `' ,�k.+�li�o
TITLE: r!o_m mAF
E.XIiIBIT: --,,A— SCALE sow
E
L6
lz
7
<
SO
L
Ape xo.*c;4
1A
Xf
1 8 1c. L.
MoM'-rG VISTA ST
NORTH
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCANIONGA
PLANNING DIVISION
ITEM: -\-J4& "600 glmooL - -
TITLE- I?L&-r Flom
EXHIBIT= SctkLE- aww
I-]
L
Ll
.1
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAIMONGA
PLAINNING DIVISION
c�
NORTH
ITEN-1: VrkF - �o , 21 dL
TITUD I drAff M"=
EXIMBIT--. 4 -SCALE mmlv
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING
COMMISSION APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 81 -02 TO
DEVIATE FROM FRONT AND REAR YARD REQUIREMENTS
LOCATED AT 6969 AMETHYST AVENUE IN THE R -3
ZONE.
WHEREAS, on the 21st day of May, 1981, an application was
filed and accepted on the above - described project; and
WHEREAS, on the 8th day of July, 1981, the Planning Commission
held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the
California Government Code.
SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made
the following ndings:
A. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of
the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty
or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the
objectives of the Zoning Code.
B. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances
or conditions applicable to the property involved or to
the intended use of the property that do not apply generally
to other properties in the same zoie.
C. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of
the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of
privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in
the same zone.
D. That the granting of the Variance will not cotj!,titute a
grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations
on other properties classified in the same zone.
E. That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental
to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially
injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JULY, 1981.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
8Y:
Jeffrey King, Chairman
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Planning Commission
Resolution No.
Page 2 �.
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 8th day of July, 1981 by the following vote to-
wi t:
AYES
NOES:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
E
9
11117
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 22, 1981
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development
BY: Tim J. Beedle, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: APPROVAL. OF INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN
ABSTRACT: This Planning Commission will hold a public hearing to con -
s ear the Draft Environmental Impact Report and adoption of the Indus-
trial Specific Plan. This report summarizes the revisions which have
been made to the Industrial Specific Plan and recommends approval of
the Industrial Specific Plan and certification of the Draft Environ-
mental Impact..Report.
BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission has held two previous meetings to
discuss and obtain public input on the Draft Industrial Specific Plan.
At the previous meeting., the Planning Commission reviewed all the major
sections of the Industrial Specific Plan which include:
o Regional and Community Background
o Area Development Concepts
o Development Standards and Guidelines
o Subarea Development Standards
o Implementation Programs
Although numerous minor word changes were necessary throughout portions
of the Industrial Plan, a few more significant considerations for changes
have been suggested for the Land Use Plan and Development Standards.
These changes are summarized as follows:
1. Industrial Land Use categories were modified to redefine the Heavy
Industrial area south of Arrow between Haven and Devore Freeway to
"Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial ". This definition notes the charac-
teristics of the existing industrial users and distinguishes the use
characteristics from heaviest of industrial users allowed within Sub-
area 15 east of Devore Freeway.
o�
ITEM C
Planning Commission
Approval of Industrial Specific Plan
July 22, 1981
Page 2
2. Cnanges were made to Table III -1 on page III -6 to add a new land use
category. Building Contractors Service Yard" provides storage yards
for larae construction equipment and construction contracting firms.
3. Additional land use type definitions for Minimum Impact Heavy Manu-
facturing was provided to describe the land use types within Subarea
9.
4. Throughout the Development Standards section, reference is made to
Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial (Subarea 9) where appropriate devel-
opment standards are necessary. The parcel size in S, .jbarea 9 is a
minimum of 2 acres extending from Arrow to 1000' south. with the re-
maininq area having a minimum parcel size of 5 acres. The reason for
this was to provide for similar parcel size to the land use adjacent
on the north side of Arrow and maintaining a 5 acre minimum for other
areas appropriate for the larger industrial user.
5. Minimum landscape coverage was modified to reflect the land use coverage
on a subarea basis. In addition, calculations were made regarding the
existing surrounding landscaped coverage of projects recently approved
in development, especially those west of Haven. In some cases, land-
scape standards were reduced while in other cases landscape coverage
was increased. (Graphic material will be available at the meeting to
answer any questions). An additional provision has been indicated to
allow modifications of the landscape coverage when the Planning Com-
mission determines that a project achieves a high quality design and is
compatible with the land use category.
6. The 75' building height limitation was replaced with a requirement that
any buildings over 75' in height *oust be approved through a Conditional
Use Permit process.
7. Changes were made in the Subarea Standards to reflect those made as
part of the overall development standards.
El
8. The provisions for Master Plan requirements, as stated on page V -4, has
been modified to clarify Oe intent. The purpose of the Master Plan
requirement is to assure tilat any projects that would consist of multiple
ownership or phased development should be compatible with the development
standards of the Specific Plan through the preparation of a Master Plan
prior to development. This Master Plan may be modified at any time future
development might warrant the modifications. Any changes must be compatible
with the overall project design and the Specific Plan standards.
0
Planning Commission
Approval of Industrial Specific Plan
July 22, 1981
Pace 3
Included with the Industrial Specific Plan is the Draft Environmental
Impact Report. This report has been completed to satisfy CEnA require-
ments for environmental processing of the Industrial Specific Plan. The
report has been out for public distribution for the last forty -five (45)
days during which time no written comments have been received. Should
any be received prior to the public hearing, those will be brought before
the Commission for comment and discussion. In order for the Planning Com-
mission to recommend adoption of the Industrial Specific Plan, they shall
also provide an opportunity to take public comment on the Draft Environ-
mental Impact Report. The draft Environmental Report essentially outlines
potential significant impacts for the development in the industrial area ,
and how the Industrial Specific Plan addresses mitigating those significant
impacts.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider
recommendation to the City Council that the Draft Environmental Impact
Report is complete and adoption of the Draft Industrial Specific Plan
with modifications by adoption of the attached Resolution.
Respectfully submitted,
t
— G�1
JACK LAM, Director of
Community Development
JL:TJB:Jr
Attachments: Draft Environmental Impact Report
Draft Industrial Specific Plan
Resolution
►.J
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL
A CERTIFICATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
FOR THE SPECIFIC PLAN OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA AND
APPROVAL OF THE SPECIFIC PLAN OF THE Ii9DUSTRIAL
AREA AS PREPARED BY THE CITY AND MODIFIED BY THE
PLANNING COMMISSION.
WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 65450 allows
Cities to adopt a Specific Plan, and
WHEREAS, Rancho Cucamonga has prepared a Draft Specific Plan
for the Industrial area as shown on Exhibit "A ", and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has studied said document and
had conducted public hearings receiving public input from the coirdn'ity
regarding hoth the Draft Plan and the Draft Environmental Impact Report,
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission upon conducting its public
hearings has recommended modifications to the Draft Industrial Specific
Plan.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga recommends to the City Council:
1. Certification of the Draft Environmental Impact Report.
2. Approval of the Draft Industrial Specific Plan as amended
by the Planning Commission.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JULY, 1981.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Jeffrey King, Chairman
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Panning Commission
1
J
11
Resolution No.
Page 2
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the-City of Rwicho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City c: Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 22rd day of July, 1981 by the following vote to-
wit:
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
lit
N,
,a
M
um
0
LLJ
a,
C M
U)
ZIX
ul
1 -G -
I
11
Cl
0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 22, 1981
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development
Rv- Dar. Coleman. Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRGNMENTAL ASSESSNT ME AND TENTAT :VE TRACT NO. 9658
MCCUTCHAN - A tota'1 resi cntial dove opment of 26 lots
consisting of 52 single family residential dwelling units
arranged as duplexes on 6.92 acres of land in the R -'L
zone located on the north side of 9th Street between
Baker and Madrone Avenues - APN 207 - 261 -03
ABSTRACT: The applicant is requesting approval of 52 units arranged as
duplexes to be located on the north side of 9th Street between Baker and
Madrone Avenues. This project has been designed as a duplex development
in accordance with the R -2 section of the Zoning Ordinance. The project
is in conformance with the City's General Plan and has passed the City's
Growth Management and Design Review Process. Consequently, approval of
the tentative map and Negative Declaration is recommended.
BACKGROUND: The applicant is 'requesting review end approval of a 6.92
acre residential subdivision on the north side of 9th Street between
Baker and Madrone Avenues (Exhibit "A "). The site is presently zoned R -2
and is designated onthe General Plan as medium density residential (4 -14
du's /ac). The site is presently vacant and consists of weeds and grasses
with no existing structures. The existing grade slopes at approximately
2% in a southeasterly direction. The property is surrounded on the north
by a church and orchard, on the east by commercial and residential, on the
south by single family residences, and on the west by Los Amigos Jr. High
School.
The proposal has been reviewed as a total development package by the Growth
Management and Design Review Committees in accordance withthe Growth Manage-
ment Ordinance, and met the minimum point rating threshold required. The
conceptual grading plan has also been reviewed by the Grading Committee and
received approval in concept only.
ANALYSIS: The tract map, as shown on Exhibit "B" has been prepared in
accordance with the State Subdivision Map Act, and the City's Subdivision
Ordinance. All structures have been designed in accordance with the R -2
zone sF,tback requirements. Access to the tract has been provided by 2 east -
west cul -de -sac streets from Madrone Avenue. To meet fire access require-
ments, the applicant will be required to provide fire lane access from
Baker Avenue to the cul -de -sac on "B" Street. The proposed site plan, as
shown on Exhibit "C ", involves the realignment of Madrone Avenue at 9th
Street to eliminate the curve. This will necessitate the abandonment and
ITEM 0
TT 9658
Staff Report
-2-
acquisition of prblic right -of -way.
Juiy 22., 1981
The site plan, as indicated on Exhibit "C ", proposes duplex units arranged
such that only one garage from each pair of �lnits faces the stn <ets, The
Conceptual Landscape Plan, Exhibit "D ", indicates the use of 5 foot grape -
stake fences between units, to enclose back yards.
As can be seen from the tract map, the southerly cul -de -sac encroaches into
the church property. The Engineering Division is recommending that the cul-
de -sac be revised so that it does not affect the church. Attached as Exhibit
"J" is Engineering's proposed alignment. In addition, Enbineering is recom-
mending that additional driveways be combined as shown on Exhibit "J ".
The Design Review Committee has reviewed the submitted site pl: -. floor
plans, elevations and materials, and landscape plans and have recommended
approval of this project. The Committee requests that front yard land-
scaping be installed by the developer in addition to the planting as
indicated on the Conceptual Landscape Plan. The conditions of approval
as recommended by the Design Review Committee have been incorporated into
the attached Resolution for your consideration.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Part I of the Initial Study as completed by
the applicant is attached for your review. Staff has completed Part II
of the Initial Study and has conducted ;: field investigation. Upon com-
pletion of the Initial Study, no significant adverse impacts were found
as a result of this project. The issuance of a Negative Declaration would
be appropriate if the Commission concurs.
CORRESPONDENCE: A notice of public hearing was advertised in the Daily
Report newspaper. In addition, approximately 30 public hearing notices
were mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. To
date no oral or written communication has been received regarding this
project.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct
a public hearing tc consider public input on this project. If, after such
consideration, the Commission concurs with the findings and conditions
recommended by Staff then the adoption of the attached Resolution, with
Conditions, would be appropriate.
R spectf(uilI submitted,
K LA1WlI, Director o
Cor,4nunity Development
JL:DC :cd
Attach.
Ell
E
P
E
0
E
CITY OF
RANCHO CU AAlMONGA
PLANNING DIVISION
�>-�)
NOb TH
kfs
TITLE: _
4CAM04 MAP
EXHIBIT= SCALE- 0ownp
n •)
x•ooc
'o] 1
/ L
r
�I l
I
r
/ y
y�c a
• �'wrrr.r�
V
NORTH
E
CITY OF ITEN't
RANCHO CUCAN'IONGA TITLE:
PLANNING DIN'ISION EXHIBIT: _ SCALE=
E
0
E,
CITY 01,47
RANCHO CUCAlV ONGA
PiANNING UIViSION
TITU- _ otom VAhd
EXHIBIT: ____ia___ SCALE: 000"'
C5�
NORTH
i
0
NORTH
E
CITY O ITG,�: 'fit' q�oowl
RA\•CHO CUCANIONGA TITLE: d�deffUAL aoAol
PLANNING 1D1'%'ISIQN E}CHII3iT __0 SCALE:_
E
11
i4rontElevation Al ,
CITY Or
RANCHO CL,TCATMO \'GA
PLANNING UNISON
TITLE: teg yArmQ "J
EXHIBIT= 29 SCXLE: _Avm"
NORTH
L L'N
MMO
aAI
I
ill
�•i �
� \
.. � 19} �.Y
1•n 44.�
I��..1N1i•Y
•y�
1�`� ",'.�. _,
W
"�.+..ww..
<vj
s /'.�yi.�.�tT �+.�'w4rM
ar �.
—iVy
•� rY nom•
Right Side A 1
i4rontElevation Al ,
CITY Or
RANCHO CL,TCATMO \'GA
PLANNING UNISON
TITLE: teg yArmQ "J
EXHIBIT= 29 SCXLE: _Avm"
NORTH
Ll
1
All
_u.- I �,.,,ai�s'�- _'- ..'G'T.' i� r •���i 1.'— �ir= }- r:s —.�.� n— �— �_ —.r.�. ...
Riglit Side C
Front Elevatioxa C 1
V �
I\K)RTH
CITY OF ITFIN1: or %* Ts
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE 94-- arl��
PLA"NNING DIVISION EXHIuT:_19 _SOXLE- gw °
f
CITY or
RANCHO CUCANIONGA
PLANNING DIVISION
I�
El
NORTH
EXI MIT: -P- SCALD
u
CITY O
RANCHO O CUCATMONGA
PLANNING DIVISION
V V
NORTH
ITEM: _`tea ®�� ��✓ ��p�y
TITLE:���rvl�le AM �m►ft r3m
EXHIBIT 2 SCALE -_ -
C
w
CITY 0147
RANCHO
PLANNING DIVISION
C V
FORTH
ITEM= lrqc.6va _
TITLE= r 5Ej�C� /�pg
EXIA13M. SG1LE- _. �71"
Ll
El
CITY" OF RANCAO CUCAMONGA
INITIAL STUDY
PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant
Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $80.00
• o..r
nil - rtr- n_io_r_ --a_ rcr711i.rincr environmental review. this form must be completed and submitted to the Development
Review Committee through the department where the
project application is made. Upon receipt of this
application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare
Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review
Committee will meet and take action no later than ten
(10) days before the public meeting at which time the
project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of
three determinations: 1.) The project will have no
environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be
filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact
and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or
3) An additional information report should be supplied
by the applicant giving further information concerning
the proposed project.
PROJECT TITLE: Tract No. 9658
APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE:
McCutchan Engineering, Inc., 265 N. San Gab-iel Blvd.,
Pasadena, CA 91107 (213) 795 -53.62
NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED
CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Garry Vander Mende
265 N San :abriel Blvd. Pasadena, CA 91107 (213) 795 -5162
LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.)
Baker Street and 9th Street _
207- 261 -03
LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM IfOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND
FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS:
None
- "I-r
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
in which each unit is indiv,
subdivision.
This is a du
owned
i.iaing project
a zero -lot line
ACREAGE OF PROJECT A &EA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND
PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: Parcel contains 6,92 acres. No
buildings exist. Proposed homes to contain square feet.
DESCRIBE THE ENVIRON?lENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE
INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) ,
ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE
OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY
EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACK NECESSARIf SHEETS):
The project site is relatively level, sloping from northwest to south-
The surrounding properties consist of a Junior High School church.
orchards and single family residences
There are no existing structures within the proiect site.
Is the prc:ject, part of a larger proje -!t, one of .. series -
of cumulative actions, which although _ndividually small,
may as a whole have significant enviroi:nental impact?
No
E.
11
WILL THIS PROJECT:
YES NO
X 1. Create a substantial c.zange in ground
contours?
X 2. Create a substantial change in existing
noise or vibration?
A 3. Create a substantial change in demand for
municipal. services (police, fire, water,
sewage, etc.)!
X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or
general plan Jesignations?
X 5: Remove any existing trees? How many? TI /A
X C. Create the need for use or disposal of
potentially hazardous materials such as
toxic substances, flammables or explosives?
Explanation of any YES answers above:
IVA
IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of
residential units, complete the form on the
next page.
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the'statements furnisb'�d
above and in the attached exhibits present the data and
information required for this initial evaluation to the
bast of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and
information presented are true- and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief. I further understand t1n t
additional informatics may be required to be submitted
before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Developr..ent
Review Comm.itt�e_
Date_ �2'/// f�� Signature G ✓���
Title \
x?�
RESIDENTIP.L CONSTRUCTION
The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the
school district to accommodate the proposed residential development.
Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: M. J. Brock & Sons,•Inc. Tract 9658
Specific Location of Project: Baker Street and Ninth Street
PHASE I PRASE 2 PHASE 3 PIiASE 4 TOTAL
1.
Num'oe= of single
family units:
54
54
2.
Number of multiple
family units:
N/A
N/A
3.
Date proposed to
begin. construction-
July, 1981 '
4.
Earliest date of
March, 1982
1,ode1 -
and of Te.ntlat =ve
5.
Price Rance
"A"
bedrooms
bedrooms
"C"
bedrooms
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY
APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 9658.
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 9658, hereinafter "Map"
by m�r_i,+rhan FnainpPrino_ aoolicalit. for the purpose of
subdividirgJthe real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
County of San bernardino, State of California, described as a total
residential development of 52 units designed as duplexes into 26 lots,
regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and
action on July 22, 1981; and
WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map
subject- to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning
Divisions reports; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the
Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other
evidence presented at the public hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga does resolve as follows:
SECT ?ON 1: Tne Planning Commission makes the following findings
in regard to Tentative Tract No. 9658 and the Map thereof:
(a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable
interim and proposed general and specific plans;
(b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is
consistent with all applicable interim and proposed
general and specific plans;
(c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development
proposed;
(d) The design of the subdivi :Aon is not likely to cause
substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to
humans and wildlife or their habitat;
(e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public
health problems;
(f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with
any easement acquired by ti►e public at large, now of
record, for access through or use of the property within
the proposed subdivision.
Resolution No.
Page 2
(g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the
environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. fe
SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 9658, a copy of which is
attached hereto, is hereb, approved subject to all of the following
conditions and the attached Standard Conditions:
PLANNING DIVISION
1. All lots shall be graded to drain to the street in accordance
uoi+h Ilnifn"n Ruiieiinn rMa rPn:airP.mP.nts.
2. Provisior shall be made for the acceptance and conveyance
of drainage water frnm adjacent church property to street
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
3. Dedication shall be required by spearate instrument of
the missing right -of -way of Madrone Avenue to provide a
total of 60 feet wide right -of -way at and near the inter-
section with 9th Street prior to recordation of the map.
C. A minimum of 13 feet wide asphalt concrete pavement with
berm at the edge shall be constructed on the east half of
Madrone Avenue to match the existing pavouent.
5. "A" street shall be redesigned to form a knuckle at the
end. 36 feet wide street section shall be provided.
6. "D" street shall be realigned to eliminate the odd Lha.ped
lot and shall be provided with the temporary cul -de -sac
standard at the end.
7. Number of driveway openings on 9th Street shall be reduced
by providing joint driveway access between two consecutive
units. Reciprocal access and drainage easements between
the units shall be provided and shall be delineated on
the map.
8. Exist roadside drainage ditch on north of 9ti Street
shall be regraded and lined with riprap from Madrone
Street to the first driveway to the east.
9. Existing pavement on 9th Street at the intersection with
the existing and the proposed Madrone Avenue shall be
reconstructed to standard cross section to the satis-
faction of the City Engineer.
ra
E
E
Resolution No.
?age 3
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAV OF JULY, 1981.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO Ct- CAMONGA
BY:
Jeffrey King, Chairman
ATTEST • —
Secretary of the P anning CommlS51011
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Corraission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga. do hereby-certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introd+acedp passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga,, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 22nd day of July..3981 by the following vote to-
wit:
AYES
NOES:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS
�o- •
O.r Dr 6iD l W J4.
1 9
.. 6 b n •c ° 'Ii ,10 w
q rA lrbi 2J�6�DYr
W aw t� C
t w.D 1
W
g oo. pPWn >1°D
b r 7 r 1#
µ m J b T;6' S l
ru Pva�J
Fu '4iD 10 TN
O 9 N
N H� n 17L J n
r �d � J MO1Gir °•,
O q
J A m b+ J b
O a u7 J J 10 T
,oJ J)0N
N O J+ O +'• N >
n Jo WL
� J
6 A]YN C.r'i
A O SuJ
6 NSA rAW
H Orr 1yc a u
N M 1 u O
A b 6 J l
� rb
R
a1
µ.J r
J C O +1
y � �
6N +N
N
n ^ ^OJ
N N 3
nO w
O �
b +
J B O
6 � A
J
N +N
.w
A w O
N Y
P1D w
S l e!
N A
O•C D
n
1.[ N
�N l
J -
J W J
J
N O
7 0 q
6fYr
N
O O.
�A1�n
1M N
f�
I N
n
+JS^
6 p •�
v v
$b'
w
Q
� A
'A
S' <
a
J
.Ii n
P.
Yn,v
P
O O
r<
A
O 1
O
O V
i
} A
G
P •(
L
� d
6
N i
n.
o _
dJ
.A
on
J O
� 6
n
A
N N
a W
18S m bwwr
c + n
n w 0.rJ
Sd. WJ,
b eo ^emu
J Ab AIiM �a
m b n W A c
Y1 Qn' I•lu
4 A W a w
W a
n�d1ti
J t r w
^ = C N r 6S
A AAO9J
O + O A +
i 7 ^0.W Q
DY 9 W w A w
O J O 6 S
BO
� WH• 1pu
n J.N.c
A Nsn 1 w
N i W
a �
� O
d �� �ar�
n = l n n A
J J R< 1li160
�•C A � n W 0
A O w J
rw 6rO1O
l
�•< wS OJw:�
A b•
� C J O. - 0-
O
9 � N
7 O O N A C J
O r J O W N •l
.A O
• 11 _ w nn
T
�` •< A J10
h N W
i N
d ' :• p N A
ow o J�c
n O.O A
A S O 6
b
2:=9
A Aa O`
• y ry� 'Oy
h rD w
Y O
� v c
o m
K+ Pl V N 01 i
Big .Yi 9 N D
.a r nn c n
W w 1¢
no
+� A n•.g� z^ nb
�Tw n wA 6 N
oa �.
•O y C �O = 31 �� �
O T N O�!1j r
I!A Md •-
_ N C W
p 1y n'h �.J.. m Ig
M-
ir
p
+�..
' •C 2 C l ry N b.
N n ry <
n r 3 O N N
°w an n r
W o •^[ C bN
w
A 4 NtYi br
O n M A b r
6 A W i 11 n O r4
G �
C w J W A M
A i
w 6 Y r'� ryy
C
'\
El
}N
pYq
T
T
ti
U
O
0
t
O
`.
El
i
i
i
i
•f
N
Ob
I
I
I
I
k
xv
Y
o
/-
1`
N
`^
W
N
w.
b
m
V
T
V1
Y
W
N
O
tir9
A
AST
D
M
<1
I•TD
O
�y,
V
nwti
�r
rvw
JOQ
Abu
lr
AIDr
JJ-Dr
OP
C
qT
QVZ
7�
S
°
,
OCA
iJO
yrrL 6
^
1
{q
J
eN16vr
wal
� �
A
b
>
9
•'
'A
61D
O+rO
w A
J
}
W
MM
a'
r
a..wn,
q
•.d�b�
6 J
99w?ra•J
W
�
?
fO
-1 .
A 1
N
N
9On
7J
°OJ
,r
NNa
N
A� 1Ni10
rN2
�ry?N
Pw
0.r
°N D'
Nr
cpa
�Cp
r
r
y07
Jrlu,R
4�.
e<1�f
V: N
P�
�bID
Y6
NN
<
O
Nw
J
y
br'YJJ
n
O
AqJ
G L�
O�
pppy
rQ1
wV
W+
w_ n N
w P
J�
1x
1Ji1
S
wY
w
p
O"�U
4K^
i_i_
mN�
Iun
AJ.
WJ
6
nnOa
Ww
A
wAG
rJ4
_
r
N
V
N6r
n -•
(.a
Q
1
O„
A'J �_
�Cr
nLA
~ r
y
Wr�
6
4W
p
w
A T
d
ti b
III Y 4
W^ P
�
o
•f
r
,0
J` O
b
� �
�
9 � N
�1,u
S
r
,pL
'D
°a66c
.•'n
1a
Wn
J<J
oo
i.°.
N'�
nD °•
i
.�.°.
b
eb
wN
_r
wJ?
vo
n
�
#r��6
"'ri
•u
`11
�^+
0.J+
O, 'J
OW•C
1•CW
O'o9
WN
N
J W
y
Wn
Y• 6 J
n
J
j u. 0
J
N+
C O
P r
d W
w.O
A y
O J
O Y
1b.'
G
w
p b
-'
O'r
A 1p N
+TN_
�n
6p
J W
i•1+i
�°
� y
,•.
��
•
N
��
r
N N
rb110
Y
� n
S
J
r
� b<
w�
1<
j~
7 S
r1[
n1
wJ
J
Ar
•°WO'
1N
C
�p.
JnA
N1P
wr
ON
uZ
r1•
< A
C1
O
J
N
e
u <
3
p n
4
W
J r,
N�
4
oI"•
L
6
O
�0
>
C
N
w J
7
N
1B d
n
�
T
A
A
m
�o- •
O.r Dr 6iD l W J4.
1 9
.. 6 b n •c ° 'Ii ,10 w
q rA lrbi 2J�6�DYr
W aw t� C
t w.D 1
W
g oo. pPWn >1°D
b r 7 r 1#
µ m J b T;6' S l
ru Pva�J
Fu '4iD 10 TN
O 9 N
N H� n 17L J n
r �d � J MO1Gir °•,
O q
J A m b+ J b
O a u7 J J 10 T
,oJ J)0N
N O J+ O +'• N >
n Jo WL
� J
6 A]YN C.r'i
A O SuJ
6 NSA rAW
H Orr 1yc a u
N M 1 u O
A b 6 J l
� rb
R
a1
µ.J r
J C O +1
y � �
6N +N
N
n ^ ^OJ
N N 3
nO w
O �
b +
J B O
6 � A
J
N +N
.w
A w O
N Y
P1D w
S l e!
N A
O•C D
n
1.[ N
�N l
J -
J W J
J
N O
7 0 q
6fYr
N
O O.
�A1�n
1M N
f�
I N
n
+JS^
6 p •�
v v
$b'
w
Q
� A
'A
S' <
a
J
.Ii n
P.
Yn,v
P
O O
r<
A
O 1
O
O V
i
} A
G
P •(
L
� d
6
N i
n.
o _
dJ
.A
on
J O
� 6
n
A
N N
a W
18S m bwwr
c + n
n w 0.rJ
Sd. WJ,
b eo ^emu
J Ab AIiM �a
m b n W A c
Y1 Qn' I•lu
4 A W a w
W a
n�d1ti
J t r w
^ = C N r 6S
A AAO9J
O + O A +
i 7 ^0.W Q
DY 9 W w A w
O J O 6 S
BO
� WH• 1pu
n J.N.c
A Nsn 1 w
N i W
a �
� O
d �� �ar�
n = l n n A
J J R< 1li160
�•C A � n W 0
A O w J
rw 6rO1O
l
�•< wS OJw:�
A b•
� C J O. - 0-
O
9 � N
7 O O N A C J
O r J O W N •l
.A O
• 11 _ w nn
T
�` •< A J10
h N W
i N
d ' :• p N A
ow o J�c
n O.O A
A S O 6
b
2:=9
A Aa O`
• y ry� 'Oy
h rD w
Y O
� v c
o m
K+ Pl V N 01 i
Big .Yi 9 N D
.a r nn c n
W w 1¢
no
+� A n•.g� z^ nb
�Tw n wA 6 N
oa �.
•O y C �O = 31 �� �
O T N O�!1j r
I!A Md •-
_ N C W
p 1y n'h �.J.. m Ig
M-
ir
p
+�..
' •C 2 C l ry N b.
N n ry <
n r 3 O N N
°w an n r
W o •^[ C bN
w
A 4 NtYi br
O n M A b r
6 A W i 11 n O r4
G �
C w J W A M
A i
w 6 Y r'� ryy
C
'\
El
}N
pYq
T
T
ti
U
O
0
t
O
`.
El
L,
m V OI N
1.
Sy
N
r
I
CD
OI VI
P W
J
U -1p B„
O'A'
K
ON
J�O
•ItSti
ON>
p
y i
+pIT y
HN
I.Tw
li
ID
r r
3
OAI
O'm 6Vtl
N
r6p
qNl
�^ OW TOS �r�w�
to W ?t r
OrJ
>
TB
r n w
AY n�
.LT > n ..
>d
ro
Nr.r N�
w _'. f'
.p
C
$
Alp ^
1/
r? N 'J tir Jl0
p'1
N>
N`tl J
r
.�
qq
W
1
v A
•.
^Jl
i Is Jn >m >1O p �
O^ r1N
N
LO^
d w ;
1 NNW
T 6
y+
N
��Ip
J>
q
O
F
Nq �
i
NfJ
GNU YW �6LJ.i �.lr
9
> qT
�Y�Z n^
•_y6
a0.41p
`
q
N rX,
IDK
�.
OV N > CNOO Ian
690
aw M
>Qln
1q
50
JJ
Ip
N K
K Y ^ m H O C+ 6
�lq0,'p
T
n w
q'ww J A •V4
�
O -'I/t
GUn
>
l �
'
N
aM
�6 oo to nmA V9 N SQ
r1oG
S >w
9ayw �'�
lon
o�Y
r>,
r
r M1
�q N
1'�
i°m >�� VtU r>• nry9W OY
Vlan
eD� 9
4FWN S�J
p�
�.
02
ry
10N A
A
N P OO
•" <O,r S r 'I' N n O. N
-I >
?
Y G
O C n m .T.Ip T
�A
Y
C K~ N
, w
r 6
902
0 0 p
O nN NOrINrI LTi
w
A
Oj >1p
9�
0
YNO
J4
G •1
]Yi >IL )1
�6
+
r
: r
ID
>wS u>i
i
Ow0'K
A J N' • N N m C 4 N
9
m OI
> V l F q> wl
•4
n 9
r
-J
q
q
Y 10 pag n. J J n > F r
n
o m
o O N T'
o+
~i
N x F
q 1J
10
tT
n ro
)� N
�A'O
Vm
A
aio e• i�
OIV. V.m
INnA
Y
=O"- n q
a
O
r N
�
O• q
O •�
�
,4>r
i
Y 6 ^ l r A l Y N� �I +_". > >•1
�JIIC+�p
p' N
n J�
T�
6 4 W 9>
q
~ M
y
a i.
n N m ^14
nm 6ilJ J K6N 6
S
q Or
^ALL
O'� n�
w
6
Cn1
q
Nn
�Cw
N>
J
�6
Ip fj
=y,
O> 9C rvO »
yd
n
•F �•
4 � Y
O
•�J d�
Y q
16
t w DnJ >UOY� new
it
O
NN O
V, >
NA
J
6FNr
m0
>
C
tlw Y
!1
nn CLl 10 •�IJ IT W
Cu C„>I
�_N
JN>
F»
�pr
JY J
qu>i
r
?
n9 0
IJbn
YT y'.
1p
r
�L
nv � �OtO�OD +M D•1p
�O>
qqM
O6JOi
•
r
NJ
4L')�
O Oq
FN
S
O'
6 r
j
NJ
q0 J JSn 9q l_6
AV r F6 q�9N
nf1
w•y
9FID
�•II
/.p
N
N tL
m
F J
+. ry
Fw H
li
_9
�A FO 1 � +6>rF �.
V
Y•
C10
6l9 ^l
J Ll
C
Y
•JC Nr.
n 6
9Tp C
wry l 9
�O
p
JYr
Y P V O
L
_
l
^
C
C' d CCC111
n
>.. t^ nLro flwJ w
L"
it
y
� J
l
n
qr
Jlp
_
�I
tl
AJ o
�
T • >C JDb, OLCIA
A
OI VAIr
^ N
B. 'J
N.I•�9
•A.O
>�
1
T
y
Cr In J Nye A IJ
A
ISO
TNJ
OILS
n
O
�
O N
y
r 10 m0 3n..t
q99
N.
QN
FOn
TO
n
0.
-JA
n •w n >' O U Y n
S n
.
�, � J
L
O M1 r.
F
1f
O
'I
ID
b q
mw o >m
Npap
«ri
p w
B.
nY
"
>� NN9
n— q q�l o�j m
N
o
WA
i• a',
n�
a,
9
n
�...
OJ Nnl n�9ur;C6q 6
O
r�l
+•+
V-1 nKb
ION
TN
Ib
�� 6
C W Or Qan'WJ IO F
D'
P,KP
1�d CID �D
9a
rr.•iD'
Fn0
OIO
T
Oq �
IJI,N Y. � rOOq J'n^ S
9O
^
n O O� x m
9 J
'J •w r.
10
S�
�
�
b
q 9
ij' .
q 4 A � l �
000wn
�^
oJrvrsrm
Ipll
•�+ r
on> >nmc �
N>T r
6ON
iuN
I
wJ
Nn
Y9
m
JT
d
�:
J'n w�9
p r
Jy
•
7�q
•SH
!i.
� O F 9 •• r C O� n
y,b O• r J u O m O
W
N
O n_
l
Sm
V P C
O N O I
C J 9 q
A
Q
'O
-J rp
y
O 9
11 J
r 'S OnIO ,Cn wdO to O
✓
99 O
<LI O
IO O_w
^
8
LI ,'
rn,Ow N� nqr
O' 6 nK •^
+
�C
G
<
NN
l
�l
A
Cg
� S
99
ti
ETr
O
7
W
YII
M1
!N
O
4�
N
A
(Y
N
✓_
W
C
'V
�
I. 09 C`l W
S.>i= '.IV
'�J
p A N
r
V-I
m =}'
O•Ln
K
r.w CN
J
.1�
IO• + %^ -? C 6
Imn.�T
w O '�
1D
n N
V
S A g<
•J �
__ C
K>
N A
v J
ID H T r ID
NK;PJ In D�.N 10`Cp-
�
'.
M_ J OIO •rp 0 d C
n? N
+J
r � �
y
YO
» O
10
� r
� FN J
,6r
OOJ
r0 rG
{
N ^
,
�89
1,.
11 O A ryJ
O IN =
9 r.ROA
v
S
O W O
nJ
ry~ 6 N
ION1I
N = r. NO n
ri �pI 6w N -}
r
J
.q•. �j N
9 J
y�
C-•
OS =.
m q
j.
�p
.nI r
�O
10 AB
�m
J Y
nJ`,
l
O
=
p
1"
Jn�}'Q O
SF
n
9 L
qJm
r.
C
96
rll0
�Nn
Nay
uqi
YI�OiI
�•)wm
N
4OOOO�iYS. 0L
gO ^
Qn
J
_O
IOOW
I IT b
.
,A'
Ky
JN
^>4
NJ
8r
all
i
IIIL
9VL
N=4
�G�}S a
q
T
V C
?
�•J
SS�wl4w d
W J Y + O' N
O
O
O D
NN
U ^ f.
I
N
l.•.0
A P n
L. am
1 •'
M1
'
`
V
M
n
W
c N
' w
'�'
Y
�J
I
I '•. C
Aq
YA
•ryIKN
.Oq
NrlpD w"'.�Ni -O ryK>I'
r'
•w6
J
R
rjv0
p9
nJ.p
/
r4 6DTINJ
O
WO
�
dIA
I r•
N
N6
NA
N J
Am
(yA
r
S
��
6Or
Y...�L
A
-vA
»r:
iN1p^
ID
no
c
-a
Y t�
�•3
on n
m
I'w m
N
•
q � OC7 w
i
�
~
ro
—bT
nw
� b�.
^nC Z
of
rrr
S > d y
q
C q S
Y d
O q
C C
v
•
Vv
N
y
q
10 9 C n
N
A�
q
p
M
�+N
V
nq nnw O_
Al
MN
^
�C
� <r
6p
pL'r
Nr�i
n:D
fql
ID
'
>9Anon r
il^!N
G A �• � N Y l M
O0
^. Yw �
O
�
b S Y
`
Ow
YI•�
ww e6
^6
=
� 1
w
i I
a•a O♦
O O �♦
n N r N
iS b J
♦O l N.1
K N
L N VCr
^ r
9 q 6
6 oa u_
d l
O r E
ma + }
^14
F
'n 6
P♦N ^ O
P>
6= N n
N P
i of
CN n a
O N r n
4 6 i
J
Ol T ♦O A
rJ u o
>4 rC
♦O ? r
n 4 AP.
O
6 O 6V
N l
• F .8.
V r.4
mN
6
I
N
o n
m <n
In
go°
V ,
O <
, w
n N �
W l
=WR
N � »
t 6
n J.
aNr
60 N
C � C
i r p
^u u
w u 7
Y
9 nd
dNn
V �N
P O
N
O r
n d
4 n
J N
1=
I=
n y i�j
O
N � C
n 6 i
u "]
N r
N W
w n
d
w �
TAT
m r5
„ ?O
n O
n n
m J
N ♦O
T
O
Y N
♦` o
w l
J O
O
O
c m
6'<
M
N
J
N
� W
r Y
O l
•O
N w
o♦
S
C
Y
N
J
N
n
Wp
N
n
n
4
4
a
A
9
'o
a
4
N
,
d
P
c
N
u
v
aG
6
W
N
NQ � � � P'♦P20.0
♦O r F i m N N<�+
fan Qr w xr���
N f n O_ u H
V ^ 6 N » S
•J S Y F N O O O
Obi p♦N N plr
-•v � Nw4n
N O N N r F ^
qL N
�Y dN r ♦n IL =O
g T
�-' •'N ° ��ow
, n n
w lu 6 F 6 j.V
4 n N
S J rr•. N O
v♦ O N 6 W= li Y
Nw w ♦O 1Y n.+�
f r tl ? f\
O r♦ n V Vb N
au � rr
♦O 6p r0
O N p Y
N»wJ
�r •� J rn
O J r
� w J O AAry N
.d.
Ndw
p p 4
�6p
O O O
b� S
W W
N n N
^ N n
O O O
oJ-
n
N O
.N. ♦$ o ° J
Y 6 16 w
N r f +
u.o b o
J uN
W
-•7 b
� r y
N N 1T n
m N
t n
O W N
T P
S N �
N
N
O ♦wi. b
L v
�Tb
u o
w�
o N'm
� Y
d � O
O w
J l
c n
» N ^
Oh
_ S
O N
oS
O r^^
Y
y y
N
f�
r
if
n
Z
h
m
D
C
O
O
.l!
n
yw
2
i
O
�P4C4 MNNT
N r O n i g V r O
onPN v.�'�l
IYG w3N0 a �O
N♦-r (rY. Or+W
S O N J A n J
VC•/ ^bC •nO QN
T
FNN � O♦ d nOP
r
W cN� oe�r
J» N b J 4
4Td. Tr.
r�•?�;• wry
S J 6 r.♦��p11 r �.
RNn.. ID PdN
-• N
1J0` =tl m1a ra =tl »io
rJ • G F "
N 7r� O _6rV
• -IJN l Y uGi
N w N D P
SN p{bN�NL �mm!�
8 J♦CV N Two
N T--N •r O♦ry C
J v
t ♦O N
N J
l p
T
IIN
r,fR
<
r
Od O.1 O
Y N
N O P o J
< l N Q
N W f♦
V y uS• _
m J w
N
W W
w i r y
NN�n
n
r �
6 ?
J
4 OT »
6 y S
J N
W
=5a
n
N N
b
J O
d N O
m —m
b O
» J
»•r0
a
nma
» N O]
i •`r
O n +
N 4f)
C � p
w N
N 6
Qp
i
O S
L •�
N
a
ti
n
ti
T
m
O
3
O
}
2S
rn
O
s
I� x e\
N N v r
o w w r 4 r � T
.L..
w-n N?N 9♦6�L 0.0
6r.Ji�O Y »<y Jw
Cd TnT =(u tpy
J 'O ♦ppn••N rirj
n 0u10..6 �. 1'♦J Ni
m N� ^n `'L J O •^i N i
»vo' rr +r n!4
m a W -1 � mat .•Nj w 9Y' ,
avruOJRm ..moo
l ry
4 w (Y
p4 =09 >cfi N.V
�N irN J�rin l
♦° n tl'..Pi l v
°Ta�io♦o`nc �^ a
�iry wiL J r^. rNi
+N �v o
>> ^bNnN ^N
oarew Yn,r
W R at S d
�• O 9 n
♦ N
q G N
ro O^ N
v�44
w
dnN °v
wWO<
x=.Uv
l N
�oJ.
� '•'o.N
u o
-
A N
N
oral
.�.y
ry�ro
v•N..•4J
NJOG'
aomFw
�J r
C V
o r.N
n r
O l ♦O
;; � O
d
♦C
u O ry
3 bV 6
6rw.o.
TS'♦+T
O d N N
S V u N
.1 all
p;3 —
n N J
N• 9
r C F
w_ON, ��
n06r
4
� ^9m
ldn»
°♦
'� 3
n r
?�
b
aN•. N'J�cp6
5"
n N
O+
w
Nv
O J E.
YN
rJ
N
N N v r
o w w r 4 r � T
.L..
w-n N?N 9♦6�L 0.0
6r.Ji�O Y »<y Jw
Cd TnT =(u tpy
J 'O ♦ppn••N rirj
n 0u10..6 �. 1'♦J Ni
m N� ^n `'L J O •^i N i
»vo' rr +r n!4
m a W -1 � mat .•Nj w 9Y' ,
avruOJRm ..moo
l ry
4 w (Y
p4 =09 >cfi N.V
�N irN J�rin l
♦° n tl'..Pi l v
°Ta�io♦o`nc �^ a
�iry wiL J r^. rNi
+N �v o
>> ^bNnN ^N
oarew Yn,r
W R at S d
�• O 9 n
♦ N
N
4
O
P
d
4
ja
NTr
FTOi CI
Y♦
CLOT
W
w
RpN
610
qN 00♦NS
d �
pO� p
ON
J
O a
Od
'j
t��N r
S4J
Wl. r.�N
�ony
n�v
OT;
O
<O+
QC'
r
Q•'
8 r n ♦O
J-,
r
�.
Op0
N
d�
N
N ^i
y`
TN
Cb utO
�Jd IN
Gr
�06N r.
p
_ �°+
F�
f1N
db 6 Ow i
NM n1J .eN �
.
li n u g< i N
dmn-d Y.
m —�
�+ �
T.g J
aQG ."�.♦.° d
p
j
0 a S
;'
6 '
4
N
0
�
C
»n
OLN
w 6
t
dVN
T F
d
py-
R
NOS
di.
r.
J
Nr.r
N
FO
yN
<2l tlJ
ON�
O
µs
drO.G
N O N
F N N
aC 4
N
6 w f l r
N
d
N O N
O
w n
N
r
�1D ,'OJ
d
JOS
N
ON O
d �
p
O_�a
=
S?
LN
O�
Z7,7 q»
Jry
d ♦O d T N x
n~ T
F a
N N N
O N n
O
n
N V
»N^
.y..
p
N
J +T�
O
1uVW
dd O
r^.00
J'TS
N tl• p
S
TN
�
O
V
�,
JN,
O w N T
S V F
D
W a
+ l •J
p
G C
O d
= N
♦r
N
L n
r°
N
n
b�
N
r <W
L I ♦^n
W
C J
rVP
C 6 Ny
=WNW.
ray j.Nn
OJ r♦
r
j
n,
S♦•C
Nd0•
o
Hg
J .Ni fN♦
.d.N
a].
9•
�D
Y°♦�
A
TN
n.l.
S N
�JP
A
10NF
OP
nV
�Yw
1�NT NUn♦np
r
6
N°O
JaG
t:'G
rON
N S9L
4nA
$ m
N J W
mN0
W
wm�
♦O
Tw
n.
rpr
N MY
I F r
dmSSN
S C O
r.0
Jw
6
NnN
D
F,t
DOd
w
O
w
�_
W �
r.
♦pd
1p
J N
«ai
O
S l •y
O O
d w•. J
f' N 9
N S W N Y
b N
N B
i O
6 •.♦
N
q
d T
6
C
N
^♦O NNN
r.OG
N_ya
4 .r
nJYO
An6
n0.
S♦OS
d
n
W'
D'
J
»
O
J
O IN ♦O »
N J
N y. w
N N w
< 6
N
N d
. S
w
N W N
�.
♦n l l
r♦ 61O
�•
, 6
Y .O
,
O u d
en o r
T R
Z. w
N�
•• 9�w
�
V
nF
J
r
J
F0.O
�Nd
O
♦n
»�
DOS
i yC'N=
C6
610
Y. .•.w
r
S• wL♦0
60
,tp'Nl
iwl
N1
FO
S
N�1C
♦ON
IY
2-
p
O
S
y, d
dNar4V6
S N n
O d F
O
rl�•
N
J• w
^N0
N
Q
p N
=O
••
r
�NJC
JPNO
q• 0
T
r�
N
fl
N
6•c�
�O+rN
�TJ
llf
�
� V
N
9
Or
J
r
IJ 50
W A T� 6f� M •b q
a9 �G
9 m N n r �, O'O ttl K '3
ry /, 1 N Y
• i �n b 4,N J NJ �i ry nS •warn
10 n i N n y R �D N 6 A 10 C S
X rO 6 9 4
JtT H �N O L O � Ow NON-.
ry
aye n
f' yT rJ n O ;d V�C. t1Cn�
N1 �Y q 6J O O
�.- l �1 +4 0 6>
m .rp Np ar. qp 10
p N nJ' ry �.` N � 1qi•
N /11 L ;6 N6 6 NY N j1KN
�v qm nN oY
'S � Ko Nr• aN 4 N,
T �C i e Jp
N9J
n
p
m ^ n
n i
n
r
M
1�i.
.>•1
+no
kTn
mN1$m'
�Yrn
,�
oo e.
rbTr�
ShWn•
�W
A�
N1�.0
6�!1Kw
+,tlZ
l
q
S
w
n
K
W
O ,J
�•rp
10K
J 1
J
N
� �
�NOYN
,N
N
rdi
Np
anJ
�b0
`l
N,
a6
Y-•
BNnO
•1�N n�
mw
°..
bI''J
Jw
m9nN
OJnW
r >H10
M °J NTJ
'O1DO
••f llp
'�'
�d
�j
p$
Nr
o
b Iw +•
J v
-n rya
a
2nn
v�n
�
�r ha
'hn
09
%d
�-
d o
Jom1n
n��i�
a•
.r
ZZ
w p
D P
n u
n
r
S
i
+NC =�•
Jlb
n
yNnn
Ned
BOO
>
p(6p(�ugi
R
N
w
�N
••�
n
K ,6�0
J
C
�Y
O DO
do
J
iu�
NO
i o- v
p•nj�jn
J
N
C
i•
U N
N N
a
�
•, N
n
;5
gag
,
^
On Oan
n
N
AD��
Odr'm[
ON>
O
�'q
w.
v
N y
1 1"
N
n Iti
6
n w
J n C N
J N
O
N J 1a C_
•w n K
O,N +u
bw
�bWry
N ml.l
Rrn
~aN
l'D
nn16T
W N
NVJ'
.Sn
Ip
boa
N
N
ma
.mow
% ON
t lx 1N
9..n
r�1
n6
O
_
10 -�
prpN
�vawv
b
iq�
crawly
ar.�`e
rap =J
S
�
w�N
wiION
+O
�N
1
Cp
N
m
a
r
IJ 50
W A T� 6f� M •b q
a9 �G
9 m N n r �, O'O ttl K '3
ry /, 1 N Y
• i �n b 4,N J NJ �i ry nS •warn
10 n i N n y R �D N 6 A 10 C S
X rO 6 9 4
JtT H �N O L O � Ow NON-.
ry
aye n
f' yT rJ n O ;d V�C. t1Cn�
N1 �Y q 6J O O
�.- l �1 +4 0 6>
m .rp Np ar. qp 10
p N nJ' ry �.` N � 1qi•
N /11 L ;6 N6 6 NY N j1KN
�v qm nN oY
'S � Ko Nr• aN 4 N,
T �C i e Jp
N9J
n
m
l
R
C
a
N
N
O
ryi
6
n
S
O
n
w
O
N
n
d
m
a� d
IJi' y
b�
N
n n
M1 N
�A
ro_ a
1
m
G„
O r
N
O
r �
4 3
JN
y.
� O
i w
, O
T
rN.
n
Vim
1v
p
m ^ n
n i
n
r
M
1�i.
.>•1
+no
kTn
mN1$m'
�Yrn
,�
oo e.
rbTr�
NNnv
To
n
O ,J
r
10K
N
p,
N 0
9
,N
rdi
Np
anJ
�b0
`l
N,
a6
Y-•
r
UO
pry,
Kr
Y+
20
�j
p$
b Iw +•
2nn
v�n
c
�irv�
'hn
-= a
d o
C
ZZ
w p
D P
n u
n
r
S
i
Y O a
Lpa
6
N
p(6p(�ugi
R
N
w
••�
n
�JY
N
Y.
l
>
iu�
NO
i o- v
p•nj�jn
J
N
C
i•
U N
N N
a
�
•, N
n
6
i n
,
^
n
�•a
R
O
w.
v
N y
1 1"
N
6
n w
W N
YJj
.Sn
00
YO
N
N
r�1
n6
O
a�
10 -�
prpN
�N
1
Cp
N
a
�6
S
urn
3V
••
1O
Y
�
NwN 6
^
N
KO
W
N
OV
p
6w
n
ppn
ninO
K
Nn
.[ ; N
65
N
'JT�
Nq
0.
6O.
W
4J
T.O
11
N+
p
n
OW
IV
I
Oy
n
MJ
do
N
a
�� 6
n
<
37
� T
6N6
.9
A
I n
N�
yr
�n
O n
o
m 6_
hl
O
4n
O
J
y
•�f.
�O N
�i0
�
ur
n
j10
iK
6
6 N
�,
nn
NSa
T
n
O 6
N
•..
T
iz
t �O ,
N,
6
O ...
J d
N
my
n
p
Y.
O
G
N u
A
�aN1%ii
n>
°
6Ni
>
JCN
C W
�^
4
;r
>
rte. N
m N
, n l
• r
N O
n
N N
_
O
f1
aw
K
O
m
l
R
C
a
N
N
O
ryi
6
n
S
O
n
w
O
N
n
d
m
a� d
IJi' y
b�
N
n n
M1 N
�A
ro_ a
1
m
G„
O r
N
O
r �
4 3
JN
y.
� O
i w
, O
T
rN.
n
Vim
1v
p
m ^ n
n i
n
r
M
1�i.
.>•1
w u.
1N
NNnv
To
�wp
a 7 i
N 0
9
60n�
;K
N.+
aZ
pry,
-
p$
b Iw +•
2nn
v�n
c
�irv�
'hn
-= a
d o
I• N N
S
N O
Lpa
6
N
p(6p(�ugi
R
N
J�1N
�JY
9
i o- v
v w w
N
m
6
,M
mn�
,
b
�•a
R
w.
t>C \
ul
§J:;
r.\1
all
)§
!
\\
Z
2
§a {»
. 5E
\
}
{
I
J2 {^
\9%
§§
/
.02
ul
Ll
§J:;
\
I
J2 {^
Ll
ILJ
E
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 22, 1981
T0: Planning Commission
FROM: Lloyd B. Rubbs, City Engineer
SUSJECT: Director Review 79-68 - Lewis Properties
1977
At the time of the processing of Parcel Map 5545 for Lewis Properties at
9560 Ease Line, conditions of approval were included to corstruct a cui -de-
sac and pedestrian access point on Roberus Court adjacent to the west boundary
of the proposed project. As the engineer began to prepare plans for this cul-
de -sac, he came into contact with several residents aloi►g the street who re-
fused to cooperate in the design and to grant the necessary right of entry to
allow the constriction of this improvement. she residents at that time met
with the City Engineer and expressed their refusal to cooperate in road
construction because of the removal of trees, shrubbery and the proximity of
these improvements to their homes. In addition, the residents objected to
inclusion of a pedestrian access between the proposed Cuter and Roberds Court.
Because of these concerns and the inability to construct the cul-de-sac without
property owner approval, these conditions were removed from Parcel Map 5545.
At that time, it was overlooked that those same conditions were applicable to
Director Review 79 -68 �4nich were adopted by the Planning Commission. This
question being raised, it is appropriate for the Commission to hear the matter
dit' n^
and concerns of the residents with these con to
RECOMMENDATION: Because of the impracticality of constructing the proposed
cul -de -sac without property owner consent and in reaction to residents concern
on access,it is recommended that the Commission adopt the attached resolution
ames.ding the conditions of Director Review 79 -68 to exclude these conditio�es.
Respectfully sub itted,
LBli j
Attachment
J
ITEM E
RESOLUTION NO. 79-76
lalh
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING
COMMISSION APPROVING. DIRECTOR REVIEW 140. 79 -E8
LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE. BETNEEN
ARCHIBALD AND AMETHYST.
WHEREAS, on the 9th day of November, 1979, a complete application was filed for
review of the above described project; and
WHEREAS, on the 12th day of December, 1979, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning
Commission held a meeting to consider the above described project.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made:
I. That the site indicated by the development plan is
adequate is size and shape to accommodate the proposed
use, and all yards, spaces, walls, fences, parking,
landscaping, loading and other features required by
this section.
2. That the improvements as indicated on the development
plan are located in such a manner as to be properly
related to existing and proposed streets and highways.
3. That the improvements as shown on the development plan are
consiste7,t with all adopted standards and policies as set
forth in this section.
SECTION That this project will not create adverse impacts on the
environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on December 12, 1979.
SECTION 3: That Director Review No. 79 -68 is approved subject to completing
and satisfying all conditions 'of approval contained herein prior to occupancy
of the buildings and operation of proposed business.
Applicant shall �ontAct. the Planning Division for compliance
with the following conditions:
I. Site shall hp <lcvclo;uxi in accordance with the approved
plans on file in the Planning Division and the conditions
contained herein.
2. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all
conditions of approval shall be submitted to the Planning
Division prior to issuance of building permits. Building
elevations for the bank are requi.rei, to be submitted to and
approved by the Planning Commission prior to the issuance
of building permits.
13. Existina Eucalyptus trees shall be retained wherever possible
and shall be trimmed and topped at 30'. Dead, decaying or
potentially dangerous trees shall be approved for - 2-moval
at the discretion of the Planning Division during tr.e review
It
of the Master Plan of existing on -site trees. Those trees
which are approved for removal shall 1x rek.acod on a tree -
3.
Approval of this request shall not waive compliance_ with
14. Street trees, a minimum of 15 gallon size or larger, shall be
all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable
installed in accordance with the Master Plan of street trees
City Ordinances in effect at time of Building Permit issuance.
4.
Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a 6 foot high
exterior streets.
masonry wall with view obstructing gates pursuant to Cit,
and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris.
standards. Location shall be subject to approval by the
Planning Division.
5.
All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall
be architecturally integrated and shielded from view and
the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as
provided by the Planning and Building Divisions.
6.
This approval does not constitute approval of the restaurant
pad. Separate site approval is required for the az!:'_opment
of that Pad.
7.
Prior.to occupancy of either building, total on and off -site
improvements shall be completed.
8.
Parking lot lights shall be a maximum height of 12' and
directed away from all property lines, adjacent streets and
residences.
9.
Parking lot trees shall be .:.minimum 15 gallon size.
®
10.
All two -way aisle widths shall be a minimum of 24 feet wide.
11.
A detailed landscape and irrigation -.an shall be submitted
to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the
issuance of building permits.
12.
A Master Plan of the existing on site trees shall be provided
to the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building
permits and prior to grading to determine which trees shall
be retained.
13. Existina Eucalyptus trees shall be retained wherever possible
and shall be trimmed and topped at 30'. Dead, decaying or
potentially dangerous trees shall be approved for - 2-moval
at the discretion of the Planning Division during tr.e review
of the Master Plan of existing on -site trees. Those trees
which are approved for removal shall 1x rek.acod on a tree -
for -tree basis as provided by the Planning Division
14. Street trees, a minimum of 15 gallon size or larger, shall be
installed in accordance with the Master Plan of street trees
for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and shall be planted at
an average of every 30' on interior streets and 20' on
exterior streets.
15. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy
and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris.
16. The restaurant pad shall be temporarily turfed and
irrigated. Such details shall be included on the
landscape plan.
17. Dense landscaping is required in the planter along the
west property line.
LB. Any signs propos.ad for this develol..ment shall be designed
in conformance with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance and
shall require review and approval by the Planning Division
prior to installation of such signs.
19. A uniform sign program for this development shall be
submitted to the Planing Division for their review and
approval prior to occupancy of the building.
20. A change of zone for the stpject property from C -1 to A -P
shall be accomplished prior to occupancy of the site.
Applicant shall contact the Building Division for compliance with
the following conditions:
21. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform
Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing
Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes
and ordinances in effect at the tine of approval of this
project.
22. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible
construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Foothill
District Fire Chief that water supply for fire protection
is available.
23. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new
commercial or industrial development or addition to an existing
development., the applicant shall pay development fees at
the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be
limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and
Plan Checking fees.
24. This approval shall become null and void if building permits
are not issued for this project within one year from the date
of project approval.
25. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with
the Uniform Building Code, Ci y Grading Standards and accepted
grading practices.
26. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and
approval by the Planning, Engineering and Building Divisions
and shall he completed prior to recordation of the final
subdivision map or issuance of building permit.
r'1
Applicant shall contact the Enginccring Division for
co.ipliance with she following con(':tions:
27. Necessary street and drainage improvements small be
provided per the conditions for Parcel Map 5545,
including a cul -de -sac for Robards Street.
28. The driveway on the west side of the project will be
subject to final approval of the City Engineer as to
dimensions and geometry.
29. That Parcel Map 5545 be approved and recorded prior
to issuance of building permits for the project.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1979.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: Herman Rempel
Herman Rempel, Chair an
ATTEST: _
Secretary of the Planning Commission
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cuca-
monga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly
introduced„ passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of -he City of
Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the
12th day of December, 1979, by the following vote to wit:
AY1'S: COMMISSIONERS: DAHL, JONE£, GARCIA, TOLSTOY, RUIPEL
NOES: COMMISSIOVERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMM ISSI0N:CS: NONE
f I
i t
I
f l
Y
\I
'K
fly 1
I� 1j
I
1
4 Y�
I \
f 1( ti� l 1
.4•�
t
15
f
li.
I r
111 � " If , 1
1• (
'1
1 1
1' �
.�.
I
,\ I
I-
1
r
1.
5
4
,I :•
X11
1
�y
1
I
I
I
(
\
y
•f 4 i
•'
�
i
Ilt
1
1
I
f'•
Ih'
. ' I
Lai
a •
3 1
\
.y.n
� .�
.,•
1 1.1.,1"'7771 1 (1 III yll
or
1
=e
r,
aauaaaoa� .Y
JIM ' 19NOW0909 089918
VZVld VUU31S
nT I 1
1I V ,
,
�' d
13i •T I
I � �
d o � �
� � , I
� 1
I �
1 •;w 1 -
� 3 , .. •era — � ; . �, -`- �- I _
I' is ur
°I♦ 1
• r
.•- p 1
k `
2
r ,•HEN /^
s xt
gpl-
^r.
1 -, • 1
ry/ '
u' A
� I (
1 � !n.
1I ��
I�!
Y. I
• I
�f
I' a
I z.
t Iw
f7 �
a �1
i
1 3
�`• • ^ w • 4•LCM •' w
A..
i
Ir
�g.
s;s
I' is ur
°I♦ 1
• r
.•- p 1
k `
2
r ,•HEN /^
s xt
gpl-
^r.
1 -, • 1
ry/ '
u' A
� I (
1 � !n.
1I ��
I�!
Y. I
• I
�f
I' a
I z.
t Iw
f7 �
a �1
i
1 3
�`• • ^ w • 4•LCM •' w
A..
i
Ir
�g.
s;s
2
r ,•HEN /^
s xt
gpl-
^r.
1 -, • 1
ry/ '
u' A
� I (
1 � !n.
1I ��
I�!
Y. I
• I
�f
I' a
I z.
t Iw
f7 �
a �1
i
1 3
�`• • ^ w • 4•LCM •' w
A..
i
Ir
�g.
s;s
�`• • ^ w • 4•LCM •' w
A..
i
Ir
�g.
s;s
YI . -(..
3 • —O WIDE' CONC. RIBBON GUTTER •(TYP.) .60' —O "'
2% TO 4% PALL (TYP.)
r
6'-O" HIGH BLOCK WALL
(DECORATIVE TO MATCH BLDG.)
►r
C7
z
z
J
a
w
IL
V
0
z
J
w
en
Z
w
0
_�Soa City Council f
--
City of Rancho Cucaeo.a
9320 Baseline
Alta Loma, CA. 91701
+t'e, thc- owncre ci lard fronting Robcrdo Court (iar-t of Amethyst), do hereby
petition your hcnorabie body reouesting the abandonment of the existing
stred.. Rirhts of Way.
1
It has comf: to our attention that a permanent cul -de• -sac is to 'se constructed
at the end of Robe -do Court with plane for widening Roberds Court and
installing curbs and gutters in the future. This street is 3291 long end
will never be extended due to development on the property to the east lend r
Nall being constructed along that property line. The sole puepose of the
street is for access to .even residences. We are aware that according to
city code it is a substandard street. We would like to retain its rural
atmcsphere. We would assume responsibility for its maintenance.
If this petition is accepted we .could also ask permission to change tho name
of Roberds Court to Roberds Road.
pe l C. and Diane Williams 7251 Amethyst - S 1651 fronting Roberds Ct.
95111 Roberds Ct. - S 1051 fronting Roberds Ct.
Wayne and Erma Dennis
Chock and Lila age s1
r
9549 Roberds Ct. — S 561 froncinP Roberds Ct.
7235 Amethyst - N 1401 fronting Roberds Ct.
9532 Roberds Ct. -
9540 nobcrds Ct. -
9542, Roberds 0t. -
F 166° fronting Roberds Ct.
A11Ia.,Roberdo
9549 Roberds Ct. — S 561 froncinP Roberds Ct.
7235 Amethyst - N 1401 fronting Roberds Ct.
9532 Roberds Ct. -
9540 nobcrds Ct. -
9542, Roberds 0t. -
F 166° fronting Roberds Ct.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANiNO CUCAMONGA PLANNING
COMMISSION APPROVING AMI.NDMENT TO CONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL FOR DIRECTOR R'VIEW NO. 79 -68 LOCATED
AT 9560 BASE LINE ROAD.
WHEREAS, on the 12th da,f of December, 1979, Director Review
No_ 79 -68 was approved by t'-a Pla mine Commission by Resolution No. 7a-
76: anI
WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of July the Rancho Cucam ^nga mlanning
Commission held a meeting to consider the amendment to said ResolutioI
which established cul -de -sac and block wall requirements as condition;
of approval for the above- descriled project; and,
WHEREAS, the condition! of approval for the subdivision of
said projects land, Parcel Map Nc. 5545 was amended by the City Engim:er
under authority of Ordinance No. 2E of the City Council of the City o'
Rancho Cucamonga removed such cul -de -sac requirement on Roberds Court;
and
WHEREAS a petition to the
Roberds Court requested eliminati:+n
would not grant a right -of- entry Co
objection to a pedestrian access in
NON, THERErJRE, THE RAN :h
RESOLVED AS FOLLGNS:
City Council by the owners frortii,g
of such cul -de -sac requ':rement and
construct same and further voices: an
above - mentioned block wall.
CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
Section 1: That the fe'ilowing findings have been made:
a. That the cul -de -sac is not essential to public health end
safety.
b. that the pedestrian traffic through the residential
street of Roberds Court is undesireable
Section 2: That Rnso "ution No. 79 -76 is hereby revised to
I
liminate the requirem -.nts of a permanent cul -de -sac improve-
meets and a Pedestrian, access on Roberds Court as provided in
Section 3, item 28 of sail Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JULY, 1981.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ;ANCHO CUCAMONGA
8Y-
Jeffrey King, Chairman _
' i
K]
El
0
a
Resolution No.
Page 2
ATTEST:
oecretary oi t a Planning Commi on
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
the rite of Rwnr:hn biramnnoa. at a regular mettinq of the Planning
Commission held on the 22nd day of July, 1981 b; the following vote to-
wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMIISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
El
L ,
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 22, 1981
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development
Rv• Otte rrouti7. Associate Planner
SUBJECT: NEEVA EIR (Reference: Tentative Tract 11550 and Zone
Change No. 80 -11) - Consideration and review of an Envi-
ronmentel Impact Report (EIR) prepared for a residential
condominium project consisting of 662 dwelling units on
65 acres of land, generally located on the south side of
milson, about )i mile east of Haven - APN 201- 191 -07
ABSTRACT: The attached Focused Environmental Impact Report was prepared
for a 662 unit residential condominium project located on 65 acres of land
on the south side of Wilson, just east of Chaffey College.
The Focused EIR identifies a number of potential environmental problems and
proposes a wide range of mitigation measures xo counter these problems.
While the EIR is generally complete, additional mitigation measures are
recommended by staff to alleviate environmental impacts notid by various
organizations and individuals commenting on the Draft EIR.
Staff recommends that the EIR be modified to include certain corrections
and additional mitigation measures, and be forwarded to the City Council
with a recommendation for certification.
I. BACKGROUND: In August 1980, Ne2va Corporation, the applicant, filed
a tentative tract map, development plans, and a request for a zone change
from A -1 -5 to R-3 in order to obtain necessary appr,)vals for the construction
of a 662 -unit residential condominium project on about 65 acres located on
the south side of Wilson Avenue, just east of the Chaffey College campus.
On September 24, 1980, the Planning Commission reviewed the environmental
aspects of the project and determined that the proposal has a Potential of
creating significant adverse impacts on the environment. Consequently, the
preparation of a Focused Environmental Impact Report was required to address
the project's impacts on the areas of Soils and Geology, Hydrology, Flora
and Fauna, Population, Social- Economic conditions, Transportation, Utilities,
Health and Safety and Cumulativp Impacts on surrounding land uses.
The EIR, prepared by the City's consultant, Donald G. King and Associates,
is before you tonight for your review and consideration, along with an
appendix (Section 11.10) containing comments from the general public and
interested agencies and organizations. The purpose of the Commission's
review and the public hearing is to:
ITEM F
Neeva EIR
Staff Report -2- July 22, 1981
a. Determine whether the EIR adequately covers all areas of reasonable
concern;
b. determine whether the mitigation measures proposed by the EIR
Pffprtivply mitinatp nnt:pntial advpwca imnartc-
c. recommend changes, modifications, and additional mitigation measures
to be incorporated into the final EIR prior to City Council certi-
fication of the document; and
d. identify those significant adverse impacts which cannot be mitigated
if the project is built.
At this point of the review process, the Commission's actions should be
limited to the EIP. and not to the development itself. Once all necessary
mitigation measures are identified, the project will be revised and
formally resubmitted for Planning Commission action.
II. ANALYSIS: In general, the Focused EIR addresses all areas of concern
identified by the Planning Commission, and in some instances rovers areas
well beyond its intended scope. However, staff has received a number of
responses and comments from various organizations and individuals, which
merit consideration (see Appendix 11.10)_. These responses are aimed at
the issue areas outlined below; Staff recommendations for EIR modifications
and additional mitigation measures follow:
1. PROJECT DENSITY:
EIR and Staff support reduction in density for incremental reduction
in density - related impacts.
Mitigation Measure:
Reduce project density to no more than 8 du's /ac, in accordance with
the Land Use Element of the General Plan.
2. TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION
Traffic related impacts identified in the report do not appear to
warrant Milliken Avenue extenrioi, at this time. However, additional
measures are recommPndej to alleviate traffic related impacts on the
residences at Wilson and on access to Chaffey College.
Mitigation Measures:
a. Restrict vehicular access to Wilson Avenue to limited and /or
emergency access only.
Neeva EIR
Staff Report
-3
July 22, 1961
b. Construct Wilson Avenue improvements to the intersection with
Banyan Avenue loop extension near the northeast corner of site.
c. Construct adequate Banyan Avenue extension improvements trom
Haven Avenue up to Wilson Avenue, in accordance with the Circu-
lation Element of the General Plan.
d. Revise site plan to provide for primary project access on Banyan
Avenue.
3. PROJECT COMPATIBILITY
The EIR calls for site plan changes and redesign of the units adjacent
to Wilson Avenue. Due to the sersitivity of the area, additional
weasures are recommended:
Mitiqation Measures:
a. Itevise dwelling units along Wilson Avenue to a type and style
compatible with existing residential development along north
side of the street. Avoid a "walled community" effect along
Wilson.
b. Revise architectural design of all proposed structures to avoid
harsh„ geometric forms, excessive repetition of identical buildings,
use of unconventional materials, or other urban -like features.
c. Revise site plan design to provide adequate open space and
recreational amenities and to create non -urban character within
the project as well as along the project perimeter: The location
of such open spaces should take advantage of existing open space
areas on the Chaffey College campus to visually ce,nsolidate
available open space, and to create vistas in both directions.
Avoid use of solid walls in key areas along the project boundaries.
d. The use of appropriate native plant materials in key areas of the
site is recommended.
4. WATER QUALITY
The applicant is proposing to utilize septic tanks in this project.
Potential water quality problems could occur with on -site sewerage
systems given the project density.
Neeva "IR
Staff Report -4- July 22, 1981
Mitigation Measure:
Unless it car; be clearly shown by the developer that proposed
septic systems will be non - polluting, appropriate sewer extensions
aLu WA11 be required.
5. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
Appendix 11.10 contains several other comments for your consideration,
which deal with solid waste, water resources, flood control, cumulative
impacts on areawide transportation and others. However, staff feels
that these items have been adequately addressed by the consultant's
responses, also in the Appendix.
III.. APPLICATION OF MITIGATION MEASURES
If t" Final EIR is certified with mitigation measures as recommended by
staff, the project site plan and general design criteri, will require
substantial modifications. Among other changes, the number of dwellings
within the project will be limited to -+520, circulation and access pro-
visions will be completely revised, unit types along Wilson will be
modified, and substantial open space areas and recreational facilities
will be required. A preliminary site plan for the revised project,
prepared by the project architect, has been enclosed for your comment,
(Exhibit "A "),
The revised site plan incorporates most of the mitigation measures
recommended by the EIR and staff. However, staff would suggest that
a greater variety of building styles be utilized to avoid excessive
repetition and monotony (especially along Banyan Avenue extension),that
the northerly project entrance be moved to the south, and that precise
public street alignments. be worked out prior to formal submittal. It
should also be noted the substantial . amount of open space available
witlein the revised project is at least partially clue to the utilization
of subterranean parking and three -stnry structures.
While no action on ti;n site plan is necessary at this time, the Commission
may wish to offer comments and guidance to the applicant to assure that
the intent of the mitigation measures as specified in the EIR will be
satisfied.
IV. UNAVOIDABi.E ADVERSE IMPACTS
The EIR identifies several areas of adverse impacts which cannot be
totally mitigated or avoided if the project is built. These impacts
are uutlined below. to
Neeva EIR
Staff Report -5- July 22, 1981
1. The project will contribute incrementally to regional air pollution.
In a region not already impacted by air quality problems, such in-
cremental increase in pollutants would not be considered significant.
2. Grading of the site will result in a loss of natural vegetation.
Mile some of the vegetation (Riparian Coastal Sage Scrub) is
considered "most endangered" type, the construction of the Deer
Creek Flood Control Channel by the Army Corps of Engineers will
cause the ultimate demise of this vegetation type on the project
site regardless of this project.
3. Cummulative growth in the project area wilt impact fire service
capability of the Fire District, and a new fire station will be
neeaed. However, according to the District, the individual Impacts
of this project alone are not substantial enough to warrant con-
struction of a new station at this time. Standard fire mitigation
measures, such as adequate building separations, fire retardant
roofing materials, sufficient fire flow, and efficient M. ergency
access will be required as a condition of project approval.
4. The project will generate about 1,680 people, thus increasing the
need for public park and recreation facilities which do not now
exist. However, since substantial on -site recreational facilities
will be required as a mitigation measure, this impact does not
appear significant. In addition. the project would be required to
pay the park fee as established by the Council.
V. RECOMMENDATIONS
It is recommended that the Commission review the EIR and all comments
and responses contained in Appendix 11.1.0, and that a public hearing be
held to consider all public input. If, after such hearing, the Commission
concurs with staff recommendations, the adoption of the attached Resolution
(recommending certification of the Final EIR with modification and additional
mitigation mea ures a.; outlined herein) would be appropriate.
Re ecct�tf %rugly ubmitted,
lam/ -�,
JACK LAM, Director of
Community Development
JL:OK :cd
As Attachemnts
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDING CERTIFICATION OF A
FOCUSED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED
FOR A RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM PROJECT CON-
SISTING OF 662 DWELLING UNITS ON 65 ACRES OF
LAND GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
WILSON, ABOUT 1/2 MILE EAST OF HAVEN -
APN 201- 191 -07 (REFERENCE: TT 11550 AND
ZONE CHANGE 80 -111_
WHEREAS, on the 24th day of September, 1980, the Planning
Commission determined the need for a Focused Fnvironmental Impact Report
for the above- referenced project; and
WHEREAS, such Focused Environmental Impact Report has been
prepared in accordance with California Environmental Quaility Act guidelines;
and
WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of July, 1981, the Planning Commission
held a duly advertised public hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, LET IT BE RESOLVED:
Section 1: Findings: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission
does hereby make the o owing findings:
1. That the Focused Environmental Impact Report, with modifications
as recommended in the attached Staff Report, adequately
addresses all areas of reasonable environmental concern.
2. That the significant adverse impacts identified in the
Environmental Impact Report will be adequately mitigated
through the application of mitigation measures recommended
for inclusion in the final Environmental Impact Report.
Section 2: Recommendations: It is therefore recommended that
the final Environmental Impact Report, with modifications, be certified
by the Rancho Cucamonga City Council.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JULY, 1981.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Jeffrey King, Chairman
ATTEST
Secretary of the Panning Commission
Resolution No.
Page 2
I, JACK, LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 22nd day of July, 1981 by the following vote to-
wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOLS: COMMISSIONERS:
n
11
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
July 22, 1981
Members of the Planning Commission
Jack Lam. Director of Community Development
Michael Vairin, Senior Manner
BACKGROUND: Staff has further researched these standards and finds
further complications and issues which must be resolved prior to
adoption standards. We will bring this back to the Commission upon
resolution of these issues.
Respectfully Jubmitted,
JACK LAM, Director of Community Development
JL:14V:cd
av�
ITEM G
syal
WIN
Ll
E
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORAWARTM
r: c
� ! M
DATE: July 22, 1561
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development
BY: Barry K. Hogar, City Planner
SUBJECT: ADMI141STRATIVE REGULTATIONS FOR EQUESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMI'OrE
Due to the large amount of tract's that are currently submitted, it has
become necessary to jormaalize the operation and duties of the Equestrian
Advisory Committee. Please rind copy attached for your information and
use. Should we receive no comments, we will implement them as pronosed.
If you have comments or question.;, please contact our office.
Res Fectfully su witted,
JACK LAM, Director of
Community Development
JL:BKH:cd
Enclosure
ITEM H
ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS
PLANNING COMMISSION EQUESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE
p,,....�� OW" -
A. Selection of C(.,anittee Members Selection of Committee Members
sh ?il be made by the anning Commission. The( Committee shall
be eompov.pa of nnp rnmmicei_na, ,,�a
�Wv mcuwc a di.
large (City residency required), and the City Planner or his de-
signated representative.
B. Term of appointment: Terms shall be one year, beginning with
appointment or reappointment at the first regular Planning Com-
mission meeting in July and expiring at the last regular Plan-
ning Commission meeting in June the following year. The only
exception would. be the staff member whose term will be permanent.
C. Appointment of Chairman: The chairman shall be the City Planner
or his designated na�te representative.
D. Res onsi6ilities of Committee: The Committee shall be respon-
sib a for t e review of all tracts and developments that are
within the Equestrian /Rural area as designated in the adnpted
Trails Element of the General Plan and in accordance with the
City Council Resolution No. 81 -92, Trail Standards.
E. Meetings-: One meeting per month shall be held at 10 a.m. on
the first Tuesday of the month at the City Hall Community
Development Conference Room. Other meetings may be held as
necessary when called by the Chairman. At least 3 days notice
is required for meetings.
F. Staff: The staff of the Planning Division shall be the staff
of the Equestrian Advisory Committee,
G. Quorum: A quorum shall be three members present.
H. Voting: A tie vote shall be deemed denial.
11
L
11
CITY OIL' RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 22, 1981
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Paul A. Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Vacation of 7th Street at Center
As a result of planning for building expansion, Royal Creations, a manufacturing
firm on Center Avenue, has raised the issue of the status of the future of 7th
Street, which forms the north border of the property.
A dedication of right -of -way now exists where 8th Street would eventually be
built, but no street improvements exist. The right -of -way has been used for
some time for employee parking and the company has based its expar,sion plans
upon the continued use of the right -of -way for that purpose. Staff 's position
has been that a public street (of reduced width, 54' rather than 80'; should be
retained for local circulation and access to the north, as well as possible
continuation to the west.
Further information will be presented at the meeting to clarify the property and
street configurations in the area so that the Commission can consider all
implications of eliminating the street. The Commission will be asked to make a
recommendation to the City Council regarding the requested street vacation.
lly submitted,
LBH:PAR:j as
ITEIII I