Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1981/10/14 - Agenda Packet
n q r r t' Y ur wNV14L` } Y r CITY OF -�, •,,)' RANf1 Ip CU AMONGA. ,`.. PLANNING C0NImISSI0N AGEND 1977 WEDNESDAY OCTOBER 14, 1981 7:nO P,M, LION'S PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 3167 BASE L1NE,• RANCNO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA 1• PLEDGE OF ALLEGMUICC II. ROLL CALL Commissioner Dahl X CommissiCommissioner Kjr oner Rem el XCommissioner Sceranka _ C"O"ic:rioner Iols oy —T(— X III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES G June 24, 1981 July 08, 198, July 22, 1981 IV. ANNOUNCEMENTS `0 V. CONSENT CALENDAR The -ine a d consent calendar items are expected to he routine and non-cortroversiaZ. They wiZZ b° acted upon by the Comnissic.r. at one time without discussion. anyone has concern over any item, IF then it should i� removed for discussion. A• TIME EXTLNSly, gEnLlCCr F `i BARK - QR TFN7ATIV- TRzrr un A custom lot subdivis f �.5 acres into 7 lots in the p ro used R-i generally located on the west side of TurnernAve. south of Base Line Road - APN 1077-041-58 B. TIME EXTENSI^vii RE MCNAY D vidln aUEST FOR PARCEL_ MAP NO 5733 6N-Teet South of VPctoria A ateeastpofxE_` nda Ave. ;nto two parcels - qpN 227-121-17 C• TIME EXTENSION REQUEST FOR PARCEL MAP N0. GRANGER - Dividing -two r e located an the57Qy soot Side of Wilson Avenue, east of iiemosa Ave. Into four parcels - APN 201-1481-47 and 48 M\ fir_ I 1� PLANNING CG`MMIS.SION AGENDA -2- OCTGBER 14, 1981 V.. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission from the public =;crophone by giving your name and address. 1.11 such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Approved 5-0-0 D. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 81-16 - STUART - The interim use of an office/industrial building for a church facility in the General Industrial zone located at 9507 Arrow Route, Suite H Approved 5-0-0 E. ENVIRONMENTA!_ ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 81-14 - CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DIST. The development of an equipment yard with an existing 8,245 sq. ft. building, on a 2.1 acre site, for storage and repair of equipment and vehicles, assembly and welding, gas pump, and offices - APN 201-152-19, 20, and 07 ARpraved 5-0-0 with condition F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT that developer .Ctempt to require NO. it-07 rr ?18SP, - ROBEKis GKOUP - A change pr-uperty on scwth siA+e f.-r stpeet of ,:one trrom K-1-10,uoo to R-3/PD for a planned widening and that systems fee be unit development of 136 condominium units on 9.75 earmarked for this intersection. acres of land located on the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Highland Avenue - APN 201- :: 252-23, 25, and 26 A r,)ved 5-0-0 with condition G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNEn that systems fees be earmarked for NO. 81-08 TT 11928 - SHAFFERNESTLAND VENTURE the intersection of Archibald and c ange o zone from R-1-10,010 to �t- /PD for a Highland total planned development of 67 townho:Se units an 5.85 acres of land located on the north side of Highland Avenue, east of Archibald Avenue - .".^,120i-252-32 Approved 4-1-0 with requi?ement H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT to mitigate line of sight on east N • 8 -O5 TT 9369 & 11173 - M. J- BROCK - A boundary c ange of zone from K-3 to. R-3/PD for a total planned development of 119 patio homes on 18.2 acres of land in the R-3 zone located at .the southeast corner of 19th Street and Archibald Avenue - APN 202-181-23 and 24 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA -3- OCTOBER 14, 1981 Approved 4-1-0 I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 80-10 - DLV - A change of zone from A-1 to R-3/PD for total planned development of 98 townhomes on 8.5+ acres of land located at the northwest corner of Vineyard and Arrow Highway APN 207-211-28 (TT 11734) A roved 5-0-0 J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP NO. 4783 SANCHEZ - A subdivision of 10 acres of lanainto 2 parcels in the A-1 zone located on the west side of Turner, south of Base Line - APN 208-061-03 VII. OLD BUSINESS VIII. NEW BUSINESS IX. COUNCIL REFERRALS A2proved 5-0-0 K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 80-_? - MARLBOR Uf_-!•3 DEVFFLOPHENT C M� NY - total err opm�— exit of 393townhouses on 40 acres in the P.-?_ zane, located on the east side of Archibald, on the south side of Church, west side of Ramona - APN 1077-341-01, 1077-631-03 X. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS XI. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are these which do not already appear on this agenda. XII. UPCOMING AGENDA XIII. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Cvmni.ssion has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. 3 ;i.` J 6y�, •, % �j 3nV.WU3N:) r S Z � •i LL U a 1W o 7�.ww 3ny VONV11,113 u S any aaisjNow �`oa i i 3 a U3 .o �•_—��_�� �• 3rof N3MI33tW i. ca Y :i • K LL W I.�.�i•�CC Q 4 V f..l �� • r 4 3nV N3m-N Z 3nV a'nmUv HIM, CL115 Q S P u 8 3ny OUVA3NIn � W FX i 1 3UN]nV OIA03 R I, 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA -3- OCTOBER 14, 1981 -, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 80-10 - DLV - A change of zone from A-1 to 'R-37PD for a total planned development of 98 townhaies on 8.5+ acres of land located at the northwest corner of Vineyard and Arrow Highway h APN 207-211-28 (TT 11734) �S?x� JF MENAs ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP an 4783 subdivision o�—'C acres onto —' 2 parcels in the A-1 zone located on the west side of Turner, south of Base Line - APN 208-061-03 VII, OLD BUSINESS VIII. NEW BUSINESS IX. COUNCIL REFERRALS 1* ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT fdZ)). -12 - N RLBO UGH DEVELOP ENT C MP N --K_ -- total development of 393townhouses on 40 acres in the R-2 zone, located on the east side of Archibald, on the south side of Church, west side of Ramona - APN 1077-341-01, 1077-631-03 X. DIRECTOR'S REPORT. XI. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. XII. UPCOMING AGENDA XIII. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. .y s �y1{ K� 4 e Sq. w W • 'YJ4 ;i 0 3AV ANU3H] • �{ � i W •: a �• Y 3 •• 3AV VONV/A113 Z Y •••LL '�' � .• 3Ati N3Nnit'/Y e 3AV N7AVH � •� T VC�'— I� 3A`! OIVgIH]NV a W � 3AV OUVA311IA a W Nvll— uc •• Y R ,1' .�+V • S W m yY Q V •• ¢ Zi ~ z 3nN3AV dIl]n3 y a EKE vr, '• "CITY OF <� -' RANCHO CUC✓4MONGA chi ... . a PLANNING CONIMISSICiiN Y AGE NDA 1977 WEDNESDAY OCTOBER 14, 1981 7:00 P.M. LION'S PARK COMMUNITY CENTER X1 9161 BASE LINE,. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. ROLL CALL Commissioner Dahl Commissioner Rempel Commissioner King Commissioner Toistoy Commissioner Sceranka Ill. APPROVAL OF MINUTES June 24, 1981 July 08, 1981 , July 22, 1981. IV. ANNOUNCEMENTS V. CONSENT CALENDAR The following consent calendar items are expected to be - routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, then it should be removed for discussion. A. TIME EXTENSION REQUEST FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11577 -LANDMARK - A custom lot subdivision of 'f:�acres into 7 lots in the proposed R-1 zone generally located on the west side of Turner Ave. south of Base Line Road - APN 1077-041-58 a B. TIME EXTENSION REQUEST FOR PARCEL MAP NO. 5733 MCNAY - Dividing a parcel located approximate y 694 feet south of Victoria Ave, east of Etiwanda Ave. into two parcels -• APN 227-121-3.7 C. TIME EXTENSION REQUEST FOR PARCEL NIAP NO. 5795 GRANGER - .Div.iding two parcels located on the so—RIFT side of Wilson Avenue, east of Hermosa Ave_, into four parcels - APN 201-181=47 and 48 t t PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA -2- OCTOBER 14, 1981 1 VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS � The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the reslated project. Please wai, tc be recognized Jo by the Chairman and address the Commi::sion from the public -,dcrophonc by giving your narz and address. All such opinions shall be limited to S minutes per individual for each project.. D. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 81-16 - STUART - The interim use of an office/industrial building for a church facility in the General Industrial zone located at 9507 Arrow Route, Suite H E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 81-14 - CUCA ONGA COUNTY WATER DIST._ e eve �pment oi- an equipment yar with an existing 8,245 sq. ft. building, on a 2.1 acre site, for storage and repair of equipment and vehicles, assembly and welding. qas pump, and offices - APN 201-152-19, 20, and 07 Fr ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 81-07 TT 11869 ROBERTS GROUP—A change Of zone from R-1-1 ,UUO to R-3/PD or a planned unit development of 136 condominium units on 9.75 acres of land located on the northea. t corner of Archibald Avenue and Highland AvenuPN 201- P � 2.52-23, 25, and 26 Go ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 81-08 TT 11928 - SHAFFER/WESTLAND VENTURE change of zone from R-1-10,00 to R- D or a total planned development of 67 townhouse units on 5.85 acres of land located on the north side of Highland Avenue, east of Archibald Avenue - APN201-252-32 Hm ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT >� NO. -05 TT 9369 & 111731 - M. J. BROCK - A change of zone from R-3 to R-3/PO for a total planned development of 119 patio homes on 18.2 acres of land in the P.-3 zone located at the southeast corner of 19th Street and Archibald Avenue - APN 202-181-23 and 24 h REQUEST TO ADDRESS -- C'rr'r � I� THE PLANNING. COMMISSION FII � � z V y 1977 Date : Name Telephone Addrv% c��sibEj �r�c 4 4 Z-4 Relationship to __. Agenda gtem. : Name of Item )C- q— SummarY of Comments nt : / _S. /1 C11C 1.17 ___ �ae REQUEST TO ADDRESS Y , 0 7HE PLANNING COMMISSION 1977 Date (� Name L` � w Telephone Addvw : P Relationship to — Agenda Item )n Name c€ 'tem nr S _. munents ���-5�:--- � CZ =-q- ate_ SEP 29 1981 / \ W(i16tONrq COUMy / ' \ ..r . . Fr September 25, 1981 p 0 N Cucamonga County Water District 1977 P-0. Box 638 Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. 91730 Attn: George Blanchard Subj: Design and Development Review Committee meetings for Conditional Use Permit No. 81-14 Gentlemen: The Design and Development Review Committees met to review the development plans for the above-described project. This process is provided so that major development concerns and adequacy of plans may be addressed early in their review process. The following are the items of concern as discussed by the Committees. Design Review Committee 1. As you are aware, in considering your request for a Conditional Use Permit of this nature, the Commission must make a finding that the requested use can be located and operated in accord with the object- ives of the Zoning Regulations and in a manner wholly compatible with uses on surrounding properties and within the City at large. There- fore, the Design Review Committee is concerned primarily with the method of screening being provided. The Committee felt that the pro- posed chainlink with vines did not provide suitable screening for an operation of this nature and recommended a solid masonry wall , per- ferably slump stone, around the entire yard area. 2. Also of concern, is the lack of adequate landscaping around the peri- meter of the site in accordance with the Planning Commission adopted standard of 20 feet of landscaping as measured from face of curb. wit is the recommendation of the Design Review Committee that a solid masonry wall be constructed 20 feet from face of curb, which would provide 13 feet of landscaping in addition to the 7 foot sidewalk. Development Review Committee 1. The existing Liquid Amber trees on Klusman Avenue should be preserved. a Post Office Box 807 9 Rancho Cucamonga,California • 7141989-1851 CUP 81-14 -2- September 25, 1981 2. A detailed lighting plan will be required as a Condition of Approval to ensure that any lighting elements, particularly pole molmted flood lights, do not adversely affect surrounding properties. 3. The Building and Safety Division indicated that building permits will be required for any interior alterations, and a separation wall may be required bett:,een th.- welding shop area and other parts of the building. 4. The Grading Committee gave approval of the conceptual grading plan contingent upon providing a standard box culvert (under sidewalk drain) at the southeast corner of the project site, 5. The Foothill Fire District indicated that no additional improvements will be requried to provide adequate protection services. 6. The following Engineering comments will become conditions or approval . A. All drive approaches shall be upgraded to a minimum drive approach width of 30 feet with standard commercial curb returns. B. The southeast corner of the property shall have one drive approach only. C. Street lights shall be installed to City Standard. D. Reciprocal access and drainage agreements will be required and/or merger of the parcels. All of the above comments and requirements are given to help direct you to complete your, package in accordance with City Standards and Ordinances. It is our understanding that the Water District intends to proceed to the Planning Commission at this time with the project as is. Therefore, no revised plans are required at this time prior to Planning Commission scheduling. f' Your project will be scheduled for review before the Planning Commission on the next available agenda. A copy of the Staff Report and recommended conditions 5` of approval will be forwarded to your office prior to this meeting. If you have any further questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely } DAN Ca N Assistant Planner DC:cd cc: Michael Vairin CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting June 24, 1981 CALL TO ORDER Chairman Richard Dahl called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission, held in the Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, to order at 7 p.m. Chairman Dahl led in the pledge s:o the flag. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMIISSIONERS: Jeffrey King, Jeff Sccranka, Peter Tolstoy, Richard Dahl ABSENT: COM14ISSIONERS: Herman Remrel (Excused) STAFF PRESENT: Tim Beedle, Senior. Planner; Shintu Bose, Associate Civil Engineer; Barry K. Hogan, City Planner; Edward Hopson, Assistant City Attorney; Joan Kruse, Adminictrativc Secretary; Michael Vai.rin, Senior Planner Chairman Dahl, as outgoing chairman, conanented that during the past year the City has been through a tremendous amount of work and problems and had successfully worked through them with good results. He indicated that the General Plan, Victoria, the Interim Zoning Ordinance, and the Regional Center location had been accomplished during this time. He extended his personal thanks to the Commission and staff in working out the problems within the community and also thanked the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga for their part • -ipation in both the 'General Plan and Victoria Pian. IIe also expressL4 appreciation to the press for the strong interest in what was being done in the City. Chairman Dahl stated that when he first chaired the Commission he had requested that an invocation be said and he was glad that he did because he felt that God gave him a hand. He asked that the Reverend J. Ralph Wenger of the Brethern in Christ Church proceed with the leaving invocation. INVOCATION The Reverend J. Ralph Wenger of the Bretherr: in Christ Church, Rancho Cucamonga offered the invocation. tip lit;:: MINUTES Motion: Moved by Sceranka, seconded by King, carried unanimously, to approve the January 12, 1981 Minutes. AYES; SCERANKP. KING, TOLSTOY, DAHL NOES: CODrKT"SIONERS: NONE PBs NT: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL Motion: Moved by Sceranka, secn^da�, by King, carried unanimously. to approve the January 14, 1981 MinutP._ AYES: COMMISSIONERS: SCERANKA, KING, TOLSTOY, DAHL NOES: COMMISS_ONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL Motion: Moved by King, seconded by Tolstoy, carried, to approve the May 13, 1981 Minutes. Commissioner Sceranka abstained as he was not in attendance at that. meeting. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: KING, TOLSTOY, DAHL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL ABSTAINED: COMMISSIONERS: SCBi AN—KA ANNOUNCEMENTS Barry Hogan, City Planner, announced that he would be leaving the City of Rancho Cucamonga on July 1.5, 1981 to assume the duties of. Planning Director at the City of Poway in San Diego County. Mr. Hogan stated that he was very pleased with his experiences at Rancho Cucamonga., and will always cherish the relationships he has made within the community over the past two and a half years. Michael Vairi.n, Senior Planner, introduced Arlene Troup and Curtis .Johnston, the new Assistant Planners, to the Commission. Chairman Dahl asked the Planning Commissio:i to prepare a Commendation Resolution vor Mr. Hogan for the servicee he has provided to the coimnunt.ty. Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Sceranka, carried unanimously, to adopt a Resolution commending Mr. Hogau for his services to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Planning Commission Minutes -2- June 24, 1981 a; PUBLIC HEARINGS A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 80-05 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPAM'f - The development of an electri- cal distribution substation on the northwest corner of Archibald and Wilson Avenue. APN 1061-571-04. Senior Planner, Michael. Vairin, reviewed the staff report. Chairmin Dahl opened the public hearing. Mr. P-ndy Bond, area manager for •-I.e Southern California Edison Company, OW aPilicant, introduced Mr. ii.� Renner, Substation Transmission Enginevr- ing Department; and Mr. P.,n P.ail.ey, Cc-=Vnity Services Department. He thanked staff for the cooperation they have provided over the past few months as the Edison Company has tried to work on this. Mr. Bond stated that the primary reason for the needed substation is the area's growth. He listed the six sites tna*' the Edison Company hadexplored and stated that they held a meeting on June 9 with residents to answer questions and concerns regarding the site that was chosen. Mr. Bond explained the need for more electrical. power, when the s„hEtatiun would go on line, and asked for the Conditional Use Permit to be granted. Commissioner Tol.stoy asked if the ambient noise level was measured oath cr without the screening that would be provided b- landscaping,. Mr. Renner replied that it was measured with screening. Commissioner. Tolstoy asked about television interference and the effect a 66 KV line would have on reception. Mr. Bond stated that there sho ,ld not be a detrimental effect to TV reception. However, Mr. Brad stated that there might be ghosts as a. result of the transmission line being between the substation and the mountain. Commis-loner Tolstoy asked if Edison dusts off their insulators. Mr. Bon replied that they do. Commissioner Tolstoy asked how the 66 KV transmission lines are brought in. Mr. . Pond replied that t'iey have a transmission line in the Archibald substation and explain- 1 the route that would be used indicating that they would follow present lines. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if Edison builds a more low profile plant that what is projected for this substation. Planning Commission Minutes -3- June 24, 1981 IY Mr. Bc,id replied that this is about as low as it car! go. Commissioner Scer--nka asked what :Ls adjacent to the prcposed 'onendary. Mr. Bond replied that they have acquired 5.5 acres and will use approximately 2.5 of the laud with no further plane for the additional Irnd. 11e hoped that whoever develops to the north would incorporate this land into their plan. lie indicated that they are not in the land development business and are willing to sell the excess property to someone else. Chairman Dahl asked what the phasing will be from the time of landscaping to the time of l:.uilding. Mr. Bond replied that it may be as far away as 1985 before they proceed but: they are considering landscaping and building a wall. to get a little more height to the landscaping, before the guts of the plant go in. Mr. Bond stated that Chia plant has not yet been app-cmed in their budget so he did not know the exact time schedule for building. r Commissioner King asked if there wa any other *aay the substation could be laid out on the site that might mitigate the v+.ew for the residents who lire on the north side. Mr. Bond replied that he did not th'.nk so because the 66 KV portion is next to Wilson, followed by the transformer, acd secondary voltage. lie indicated that the driveway could be to^ated neat to Wilson but that ii would not accomplish much. Mr. Fenner stated that he had worked two months on this co gnt what was their standard design. Commissioner Sceranka st2.ted that there wasn't any record of setback requirements for residences adjacent to a substation. and further, asked if there world be any problems on the perimeter. Mr. Bond replied that the lots in Cerritos back onto the $ubst-Ition and that there is a chain link fence. lie indicated that what Edison is doing here is providing better treatment than they usually give to this kind of substation. Commissioner King asked if the complex were moved nortberly, would that mitigate the view into the substation. Mr. Renner replied that Ire did not think it would help. Chcirman Dahl. asked if there was anyone .;ho wished to speak for this project. .10 one spoke. Chairman Dahl asked if anyone wished to speak agaanst this project. r Planning Commission Minutes -4- June 24, 1981 Mr. John Mannerino, 9330 Base Line, Suite 100, Rancho Cucamonga, repre- senting Norman and Don Tessier and John Koskowski, strongly advised against the devel.opm�nt of this property as a substation. He indicated that development should not be allowed to take place because this is residential property and the property owners he represents do not feel that there are compelling reasons for locating the substation here. He indicated that his client's property would be reduced in value substan- tially as single family land were this to go in.. He asked that this project be denied. Mrs. Gail Dyke, 9717 Peachtree Lane, stated that she looks out at cows grazing and knows that it can't last, but dial not feel this substation should be put into a residential area. She indicated that property values would decrease and nested that she did not wish to see this project in this area. Mr. Bruce Talbot, 5656 Klusman, was opposed because of the transmission wires and poles that would be required fronting Wilson Avenue. He indicated that there would be no way to underground the wires because of the heat and power that would be carried. He felt that a substation should be considered for another area. Mr. Shaw, 5665 Klusman, opposed this project because of its proposed location in a residential area. He indicated that the Planning Commission is supposed to be supported by tax money and he did not know why the Southern California Edison Company can come into City offices and have their project approved and not come to the residents and inform them ahead of time. He felt that there was injustice to the taxpayers. Chairman Dahl replied that the Planning Commission is a group of citizens appointed by the City Council and that they are not on the payroll of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Further, that until hearing everything related to this project he does not know how he will vote and that he, at this point, is unprejudiced. Mr. Shaw indicated that he was saying that Edison went into the Planning office and came out with approval to purchase the property. He stated that they were supposed to notify people within a 300foot radius and he was not notIf.ied although he was within the notification area. Mr. Vai.rin explained that Mr. Shaw was not notified because he had purchased his property after the current assessor's rolls were published and was therefore not listed as the current owner. Chairman Dahl stated that staff could not get to each home in the area and farther explained the notification procedure. Mr. Hogan stated that the issue was not one of: notification because the Edison Company held a meeting on this and invited all property owners in the area to attend. Further, the Edison Company can go out and buy all. the land that they want. He indicated that Mr. Shaw had accused the Planning Commission Minutes -5- June 24, 1981 the City of colusion and he had no prediction of what the o,xtcome will be in what is at issue here. Mr. H.C. Burchette, 6605 Aichibald, was opposed because of television interference, stating that Edison was not qualified to answer electron?-- questions; the selection of the site and the intimation that if this project was not approved, Edison has the power of eminent domain. 8:00 p.m. The Planning Commission recessed. 8:15 p.m. The Planuing Commission reconvened. * r � Chairman Dahl asked for a show of hands from tha people opposed to this project. Approximately 25 persons in the audience raised their hands. Mr. Randy Bond provided further background information on site selection and the reasons for the proposed location. He explained when the option on this land was taken and the questions that were answered by the City staff relative to zoning requirements. Commissioner Sceranka asked Mr. Bond to explain what he meant by stating the City said this was a usable site. Mr. Bond explained that he made reference to the zoning aspect of the site. Mr. Vairin stated that staff's input to the Edison Company was relative to this being a conditional use and not an existing vise. Further, that staff had always stated that the Planning Commission would make a final f determination on whether the project could be located at the chosen `` site and that no promises were made. f; Mr. Vairin stated that Edison does have condemnation rights and in very rare instances uses them to condemn property. He indicated, however, that they are still waiting for the Planning Commission to say whether the property can be used. Mr. Bond showed a voltage drop chart to the Planning Commission explaining what happens to electricity when ;t goes beyond the optimum area for i transmission. Commissioner King asked what safeguards there ara relative to keeping children from going over the fence into a high voltage arec. and what i' warnings would exist. i' { ' Mr.. Bond explained that there would be a block wall enclosing the facility with a locked gate and visible signs warning_, of high voltage. He indicated h" that there is usually not a problem. v Planning Commission Minutes -6- June 24, 1981 u; rr' Commissioner ling asked if Mr. Bond thought there might be more problems with the dangers of children getting into the substation in a residential area as opposed to a non-residential area. Mr. Renner replied by stating that he did not foresee a problem as this is governed by the Public Utilities Commission and all requirements mandated by the Commission must be obse-.ved. He indicated that the wall. must be eight feet Nigh and would have barbed wire on top of it which would be an obstruction to getting to the substation. He also spoke of a ground-fault system that would prevent shocks. Commissioner Sceranka stated that it is important that whenever major projects are considered that the Commission look at trade-offs. rurther, that he was not sure that he fully understands the impacts of Edison moving the substation to another location about a quarter-mile away. Commissioner. Seem:;ca asked for information from Edison on alternative sites and what effect moving the site would have on the overall power services to the City. He stated that he was not inclined to think about increased services to the City but dial not want to make a decision to- night. He asked again that Edison provide alternative sites for review. Chairman Dahl stated that there are two things that :oust be addressed: one, whether the Conditional Use Permit should be allowed and the other, the environmental impact. City Attorney Hopson stated that the Environmental Impact Report should be number one. Chairman Dahl stated that he was not sure what the EIR would be , He had listened to the homeowner who stated that the environmental impact would be great and then Edison who stated that it would be minimal. He indicated that looking at the map that was furnished by Edison, the proposed station has the highest overlap of any of the other. substations. He stated that he would like more comments from the Planning Commission before he makes a decision. Commissioner King stated that he was not sure whether an EIR is needed. He indicated he had no objection to continuing this item until everyone is comfortable. He stated that he had heard input from both sides and on the basis of what he heard pursuant to safety and aesthetic factors, his inclination would be to vote against it. He indicated that he would be willing to gc, along with a request for more study to become better acquainted with this project. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he felt the major issue has been brought up relative to land value and sight problems and radio and IV problems and whether the site selection was right or wrong. He stated further that when he listens to both sides he tries to mitigate the issues and he found that he has a problem with the information that he presently has. He agreed with Commissioner Sceranka and felt that what is really needed is to allow the Edison Company, in light of the opposition, to bring in more information about the property selection. Planning Commission Minutes -7- June 24, 1981 Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Sceranka, carried unanimously, to continue this to August 12, 1981 in order that the Edison Company can provide more information to the- Commission relative to the issues rained. Commissioner Sceranka stated that he would also like to see what the economic impacts would be of relocating the site. He agreed with the residents that this is not a good site and reiterated that he would like to know what the impacts would be. Chairman Dahl asked Mr. Vairin what a conditional use permit for this site really means. Mr. Vairin explained that granting use would be conditioned upon mitigating the problems that would be created by this project's location. He indicated that the kind of information the Commission is asking about would be better done with a focused EIR. He further indicated that this is the most effective mechanism of bringing to the decision-makers those issues that need to be discussed. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he did not feel that this is the issue right now. He indicated that the Planning Commission needs to study site selection. Commissioner king asked for clarification of the motion. Commissioner Tolstoy restated the motion indicating that the Commission's decision will be put off until Edison can provide more information on property selection. He further stated that there may be more information on better sites. Commissioner Sceranka asked people in the audience to write to the Commission if there were other points of information that they would like to know about. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP NO. 6596 - A & R EQUIPMENT - An industrial subdivision of 4.08 acres of land into 2 parcels within the M-2 zone located on the northwest corner of San Bernardino Road and Lucas Ranch Road. APN 210-071-40. Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer, reviewed the staff report. Commissioner Sceranka asked about the A.C. paving in Condition No. 8 and whether a lien agreement will be required on San Bernardino Avenue. Mr. Hogan replied that it should be Fourth Street and not San Bernardino Avenue, and that they did not want to perpetuate that name. Planning Commission Minutes -8- June 24, 1981 sy . , Mr. Rougeau explained the lien agreement as a type of mortgage against future construction of the median hoped that in the Cityhcouldeget together with Further, that at some time in. the futureh Ontario and have some typ e of joint project. Commissioner Sceranka asked what the amount of the lien agreement would be. landscaping in the median island would be Mr. Rougeau replied that the approximately $8,000. Commissioner Sceranka stated that he had no objections to the City having a lien but felt that if it was carried for too long a period, the cost of construction of the median would become prohibitive. co Mr. Hogan stated that looking uttin mminss'othenimprovenener ta s at nhisntimee applicant has the option of p g rather than having the lien agreement. J Commissioner Sceranka asked if there could be a time limit- Tur the feasibility here was puttingdiscussion on improvements in atfull build out would this time and planningcCommission examination of of lien agreements. unission can do in some Mr. Hogan stated that w the Planning ion. He COn urther stated that through Te years is bring this up for redevelopment, this may be resolved. Mr. Hopson stated that the City has used lien agreements for all sorts of things and a procedure exists for their removal just as there are pr'he ures for abandoning streets. Further, that these is a way to keep the City's rights current with the land use. Mr• Hopson also stated that there are ways for the City to allow recourse for the property owner so that if it is found in the future to be irupractical it would not be held in perpetuity. Chairman Dahl opened the public hearing. There being no comments, the public hearing was closed. l-a, seconded by King, carried unanimously, to Motion: Moved by Sceran G to approving the Environmental Assessment adopt Resolution No. 81-7 and Parcel Map No. 6596. E. VARIANCE NO. 81-02 - CHRISTIAN - Request to perms.t construction of residence that will encroach into front and rear yards on a 3,532 square foot lot in the R-3 zone located at 6969 Amethyst - APN 202- III-n4. _9_ June 24, 1981 Planning Commission Minutes i Chairman Dahl stated that the applicant had requested that this item be continued to July 22. Chairman Dahl opened the public hearing. There being no comments, the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Sceranka, seconded by King, carried unanimously, to continue this to the July 22, 1981 meeting. * * * is * C. VARTANCE NO. 81-01 - HALL - A request to subdivide a lot with less than the required depth and a request to deviate from the minimum front and rear yard requirements, located at 7801 Turner (PM 6748) D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP NO 6748 - HALL - A residen- tial subdivision of .44 acres into two (2) parcels in the R-1 zone located on the east side of Turner Avenue between Hemlock and Norwick Streets - APN 1077-381-14. City Planner, Barry Hogan, reviewed the staff report, recommending front yard requirements and that the Planning Commission concured with the applicant's request for reduction in setbacks of the front yard require- ments from 20 feet to 15 feet and the rear yard requirements from 100 feet to 70 feet. He indicated that Item D is for the subdividing of the property. Chairman Dahl. opened the public hearing. There being no comments from the floor, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that as the Planning Commission is well aware he does not like variances; however, since the size of this lot is more than 7200 square feet, he would not have a problem. Commissioner Sceranka stated that he foresees no problem due to the size of the lot. Chairman Dahl asked the applicant if he understands that at the time of de.relopment for single family residences, that the front faces onto Ashford Street and would require Design Review. Motion: Moved by Sceranka, seconded by Tolstoy, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 81-75, approving variance requirements for Variance No. 81-01. Motion: Moved by Sceranka, seconded by Tolstoy, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 81-76, approving Parcel Map No. 6748 and the Environ- mental Assessment. Planning Commission Minutes -10- June 24, 1981 rl • F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP No. 6911 - HELLER TRACTORS INC. - An industrial subdivision of 36.6 acres into two (2) parcels in the M-2 zone located on the south side of Arrow Route, 1,698 feet ± east of Haven Avenue. APN 209-142-07, and 13. Senior Civil Engineer, Paul Rougeau, reviewed the staff report. Commissioner Sceranka questioned t',e• drainage pond that was previously used by Southern California Fini.shi:'.g. Mr. Rougeau replied that the development for Parcel. No. 2 could use the retention basin before the Assessment District is underway. He indicated that it is really too small to use for anything like that and that it could be retained for use by a new factory or as part of the use for part of retention for the development of Parcel No. 2. Commissioner Sceranka asked about parking and what its rises would be within the Industrial Specific Plan. Mr. Rougeau replied that if the parking is used as it is 'today, it would be adequate. Mr. Vairin stated that he had not taken count but in terms of building size, it is adequate and there is room in the back. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that it would have to comply with the square footage required. Mr. Vairin stated that it would have to comply with the minimum square footage or based on the number of employees. der Condition No. 8, improvements, sidewalks Chairman Dahl stated that un Avenue. He asked if Mr. Rougeau remembered are being shown for Vincent what the Commission's direction was. Mr. Rougeau replied that there would be at least one side of the street with sidewalks. Mr. Rogan stated that he was preparing a resolution on sidewalks and the Iustrial lks. He be SpeifiPla es of streetdonacollectorsnsuchted as Vincent at tytwil.l the discretion of the City Planner and Engineer on the route to trans- portation stops. Mr. Rougeau stated that since there are o sidewalks on the existing part of Vincent, they can come up with Commissioner To"lstoy questioned the existing casement of 1: feet and asked whether this was for utilities. mr. sou, eau replied that this is a proposed easement for building. separation and is a zoning setback easement. Planning Commission Minutes -11- June 24, 1981 IL 1„` p.•'. Y' Chairman Dahl opened the public hearing.. Mr. Kevin P,randt, attorney, representing Murray Heller, stated that his client had acquired this property unintentionally and commented on Condition No. 8. He stated his understanding from the Engineering firm is that those required for Vincent as well as Parcel No. 2 will not be required before the Final. Mr. Rougeau stated that this was correct. Mr. Brandt also questioned COn•)itions No. 3 and 44 for. Arrow Route, and asked for his understanding only, will there be only one access route to Arrow Route_ He asked if tilers was future development, will that preclude coming, before the Commission again and asking for one more access. Mr. Rougeau replied that if the parceling of the property is such that it would be logical. they would decide where access should take place from that street. Chairman Dahl opened the public hearing. There being no comments, the publ.ir, hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Sceranka, seconded by King, carried unanimously to adopt Resolution No. 81-77 approving, Parcel Map No. 6911 . Chairman Dahl stated that staff has asked for one last it(! to be brought up. Mr. Horan stated that Lewis Homes has proposed 77 lots for their Etiwanda development. lie asked for the Commission to provide direction to Staff on the elevation types that would be desired in that tract. * * * * * 9: 10 p.m. The Planning Commission recessed. 9:22 p.m. The Planning Commission reconvened. Chairman Dahl. indicated that there had been an appointment from the Planning Commission to the Etiwanda Specific Plan Committee. Mr. Hogan stated that Commissioner Tolstoy would be the Commission rep- resentative to this Committee. rurther, an alternate had not yet been chosen and it would be well to recommend another Commissioner to the City Council for that position. Commissioner Sceranka concurred. � Planning Commission Minutes -12- >` June 24, 1981 ,r 1 G. INDUSTRIAL SPL•CIPIC PLAN STITDY SESSION Prior to the presentation to be made by Tim Beedle, Barry Hogan commented that Mr. Beedle had spent a great deal of time in refining and implement- ing new work or. the Industrial Specific Plan. Mr. Beedle stated that he had received a 'letter this date from the Chamber of Commerce giving their unanimous support to the Draft Industrial Speci- fic Plan_ He then provided the background in the evolution of the Plan. He further stated that an additional land use section of Minimum Impact Heavv Industrial had been recommended for addition. 'Mr. Beedle gave a slide presentation which explained the categories of industrial land uses and what is usually permitted within them. Following the presentation, Mr. Beedle asked the Commission to verbalize their concerns so that they could provide answers now or bring back answers at the next public hearing meeting. Chairman Dahl. complimented Mr. Beedle on a good job and asked if there were any matters which the Planning Commission wanted addressed. commissioner King stated that he would like to know about the development standards indicating initial concern regarding minimum parcel size for the Industrial Park category. Mr. Beedle explained that there are two sizes, 2 acres required adjacent 3: � to the major traffic corridors such as Haven and 4th Street and Foothill t, Boulevard, to lessen the traffic impact of ingress and egress, and one-acne on other areas. v Commissioner King asked, that before getting into specific things, why is there a reverence to "Industrial Park" rather than "Light Industry". It appeared, he stated, that these are the same uses but in using the name "Industrial Park" you get the impression that,. you must have a business park tu develop in this category. i Mr. Beedle replied that these uses would be allowed in the Industrial Park because of the definitionsthat exist in this category_ He stated S that if the Planning Commission felt that by name alone this is confusing, staff could look into this. Mr. Hogan stated that perhaps it was implistic, but the General Plan desig- nation is Industrial Park and this has been carried through. He indicated that when you look at subarea 6 it is not describing some-thing like manu- facturing like custom, light, and might mean different things to different people. He advised ghat the Commission might want to ask members of the Industrial League for their opinion on the connotation that these terms might have. 'il • Planning Commission Minutes -13- June 24, 1981 1'.;: Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he had just thought of something that needed to be done relative to the definition of: terms because if they are not defined now and agreed upcn, there would be a future problem. He indicated that different cities have different terms and problems and they mean different things. Mr. Beedle indicated that a glossary would be prepared. Commissioner King indicated that he had a further concern with page II1-17 relative to outdoor storage screening within 600' of t!:!�! Devore Freeway. He wondered how practical this would be inasmuch as the free- way is elevated and what would be achieved through this requirement. Mr. Beedle replied that the City Council has expressed concern on how industrial and outdoor storage would be viewed and they wished to keep the views at a minimum. Further, that there are some manufacturers who have no need for outdoor storage. Commissioner Tolsto+•• stated that there is concern in any city of what the impressions are of people as they drive through. He indicated that the City is pl.apning a regional center and that there is a need to pro- ject a good image. He stated that a good well-planned industrial area can be a contributing factor to a good image and that a junk yard like Fontana is unwanted. Commissioner King stated he agreed with everything that Commissioner Tolstoy said but he wasn't sure that this is what the requirement does. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that this is why you must be careful about what is required. Mr. Beedle explained that if there was concern that the areas in question would not be totally screened there was the provision that landscaping might be used in what he termed a veiled effect that would provide a different kind of screening. Chairman Dahl questioned Section IV page 13 relating to retail sales out of warehouses and whether this was addressed within the document. Mr. Beedle replied that this was addressed under the definition portion. under the land use classification. Commissioner Sceranka commented to the audience and the Commission on the process which was used to prepare the. Draft Plan and his interpreta- tion of what is one of the major concerns of the Industrial Specific Plan. He indicated that the design of the '50s was primarily that of asphalt and weeds and he did not want to see that character retained. He felt that there should be the understanding that through the Industrial Specific Plan this area would be a pleasant place in which to work. Planning Commission Minutes -14- June 24, 1981 is Commissioner Sceranka stated that he would resist vehemently any major lessening of design standards. Further, that it is through these stan- dards that a better work enviroiui,ent is created. He indicated. Beedl 'sthatwor it laudeti is important to make the transition. He app and mmit �hatthe wentplan into the Plan.the Hecooperation thanked the everyoneindustrial vice--president ofetherk r the community a Industrial Committee in the efforts expended in making special. place in which to work. Chairman Dahl commended the Chamber of Commerce for their efforts. Commissioner TolstoHe stated staedCthatshe was sorryner nthat had heexpressed be well 'his own feelings. a process on the Plan but bad attended k unable to be here for the hearin6 P goo statements made by develupers- several meetings and was aware of the g He indicated that one of the goals of the General Plan was to capture workforce. as its that e some f t e people who 11ve in to make the the City t I are a nice place tonbecsoed that people would stay here and work where they live. ndustrial Plan Commissioner osesi stated ood t his,design standards.encern on tliHe reiterated that that people lose sight of gHe good design standards are needed and are wanted• astitoilook tohat the Irvine Commission does not want to say as it has in the p e and e that in the but that thi; illa�oment oseecwhatg a hasbeennaccomplished here. future, peOPe Chairman Dahl stated he felt that the Chamber rds for fCohiscommue is formally committed to the highest design Commissioner- Tolstoy stated that he did not wanto o see the wale ted down. He also commented on the excellent and p . that Mr. Beadle made. input and. was an:iaus to see what the Public feels about Chairman Dahl stated that he looked forward to the next couple of meetings with the public p the Plan. take ly 8 Chairman Dahl stated that. the on the Industrial eting dSpecific aPlan ce n as well and would be a public he arLng ADjO�T motion: Moved by Sceranka, seconded by King, carried unanimously, to adjourn. 10:08 P.M. The Planning Commission adjourned. Commission Minutes -15- June 24, 1981 Planning J. jK r ��t RLsPectfully submitted, JACK LAM. Secretary Planning 1 .i. I I, 121 , r. " l r� • r r Ik ' 1 mot" 0 � ' •1 .I'��. - '� o CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular. Meeting July 8, 1981 CALL TO ORDER Chairman Jeffrey King, cail.ed the regular meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 7 p.m. The Meeting was held at the Lion's Park Community Center, 9161. Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga. Chairman King then led in the pledge to the flag. ROLL CALL PRESEIIT- COMMISSIONERS: Richard Dahl, Jeff Sceranka, Herman Rempel, Jeffrey Sing ABSENT: COMMISSI0NERS: Peter Tolstoy STAFF PRESENT: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner; Edward A. Hopson, Assistant City Attorney; Joan Kruse, Administrative Secretary; Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer; Arlene Troup, Assistant Planner APPROAAL OF MINUTES Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Sceranka, carried unanimously, to approve the January 28, 198). Planning Commission Minutes. ANNOUNCEMENTS Chiarman King asked if there were any Commissioners who wished to make an announcement. Richard Dahl requested that a Resolution relating to the Equestrian Advisory Conmittee be added to this agenda under the New Business section. Chairman King announced that Commissioner Rempel would make a presentation to Barry Hogan in th-- form of a Resolution commending Mr. Hogan for his service^ "o the City. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Rempel, carried unanimously, to adopt Commendation Resolution No. I. Chairman King presented Commendation Resolution No. 2 to Richard Dahl, outgoing chairman of the Planning Commission, for his service to the community over thr_ past year. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Sceranka, carried unanimously, to adopt Commendation Resolution Nc. 2. x x x x x CONSENT CALENDAR A. REQUEST FOR TIME EXTENSION FOR DIRECTOR REVIEA NO. 79-41 - WEST'x1AY INVESTMENTS - A time extension request for 6 nonths for an approval of a light industrial complex to be located cn the south side of 8th Street, east of Hellman Avenue. B. REQUEST FOR T114E EXTENSION FOR STTE A.FPROVAL NO. 80-09 - LUT14.ERAN CHURCH - A time extension request for 12 mon,hs for the development " of a church facility on 2.11 acres in the A-] zone located on the northwest corner of Haven and Banyan Avenue APN 201-341-01.. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Sceranka, carried unanimously, to adopt the Conzent Calendar. AYES: COMMT.SSI0bizRS: REMPEL, SCERAN A, DAHL, ICING NOES: COMMISS10N12RS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY -c..rried- x * * x PUBLIC HEARINGS C. VARIANCE NO. 81-03 - CHRISTIAN - Request to permit construction of residence that will encroach into Front and rear yards on a 3,532 square foot lot in the R-3 zone located at 6919 Amethyst - APN 202- 131-04. City Planner, Barry Hogan, made the staff report presentation. Co-micsioner Rempel asked if this is a legal lot ani if it had ever been subdivided. Further, that he had serious problems with this submittal as a two-story. home. Mr. Hogan replied, stating that this project was res•iewed in the same manner as all. others and the assumption is made that if the lot is shown on a transmitted parcel map, then it is considered r legal lot. He indicated that i.f the Commission is concerned, it if� 3 valid point. Further, that if the legality of the lot is in question then the variance would be in question as well. Mr. Hopson, Assistant City Attorney, stated that '.he tax assessor's roffice does not determine whether a parcel is spit .egally. He indi- cated that there are so many lot splits in ran Bernaidino County it j,. Planning Commission Minutes -7.- July 8, 1981 a i would be difficult to know whether toiknow Y u arel�dealing with a it legally, t would not be an unreasonable thing a special title legal lot but this would have to be determined by office will detennine if report. He indicated that the Commission would want to knew when the parcel was split. The City Attorneys r. and under what ordinance. the split is legal or no Chairman King opened the public hearing- • applicant, stated that he 1221 N. Vineyard, the indi has papers, a cate that the Mr. John Christian, the-• would s far as can be determined, parcel is legal. Commissioner Rempel stated that the legality of the lot must be cleared. if when Mr. Christian purchased this "lot Commissioner Sceranka askedoverbuilding- he 4, felt that building the structure proposed would be Mr. Christian provided the background or. the property, stating that at arsonage. He indicated that the one time it contained a church and p refurbished anage, parsonage was condemned ;md the church itselfy want to u 1 down heppar and has `i si.nce sold. He indicated that pprooximately 1900 square feet, because including the garage,whicould do withthe property. there was not much they There comments, the here being no furt public hearing was closed. action, ui.der the the Commission has the power to contirne the public City Attorney H.)pson advised that before taking City Vs ordinance, render a decision on this item. hearing or close it and within 21 days the next meeting which would He indicated that a review can be made by be two weeks from this date and advised ti:at the Commission keep the public hearing open. t he would like to hear comments from the Chairman King stated tha Commission on this. cannot properly act on this item c^Comis;ioner Dahl stated that they alit of the at this time until. a determination ism the next Commission ade as to the leg lot. He felt that this item shosl.d be postponed to meeting. This was the consensus of the Commission. carried unanimously, Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Scerank1981Pla, to continue this item to the July 22, 1981 Planning the Commission meeting to allow time for the City Attorney's offic to check the legality of the lot split- planningPlanning Commission Minutes July 8, 1981 D. STREET NAME C'dANCE FOR 19TH STREET - Proposed to be Olive Street, an east-west running street from the Rancho Cucamonga City limits just west of Sapphire Street to its terminus at Palm Drive, a distance of approximately three miles. Arlene Troup, Assistant Planner, reviewed the staff report and requested guidance from the Planning Commission for this City Council-initiated street name change. Following the staff presentation, City Planner, Barry Hogan, stated that a letter had been received from Mr. and Mrs. G. Harna, residents and Business people on 19th Street, protesting the proposed name change for reasons of confusion on the part of the public in locating the street under a new name and the cost of replacing adver- tising and business materials with a new street name. Chairman King opened the public hearing. Mr. Robert Hickox, 7940 Valle Vista, spoke in support of the street name change for historical purposes. Mr. Mike Wangsler, 8673 19th Street, businessman, opposed the name change because of the cost of changing advertising and business papers. Mr. Joe Rambo, 5652 Amethyst, businessman on 19th Street, protested the name change because of confusion to outsiders, cost and lost e' identity of business. ` Mr. lion Huerta, 8661 19th Streee, protesteG the nama change because of advertising and the ability to use 19th Street as a reference point. Mr. Bill. Sar_kman, 8451 19th Street, protested the name change because It would create problems with having to change credit cards and checks, and the feeling that there is little historical worth to the change. Ginger Topovek, 8465 19th Street, protested the name change because of the cost involved in new street signing. Mr. Hogan stated for the record, the cost estimated to change signs on this street would be approximately $800. Mr. Levon Haves, 8665 19th Street, owner of a store fronting on 19th. Street, opposed the name change because of difficulty in locating the •i street under a new name. Mr. Hayes also stated that he would sue the City if this name change proceeded. Mrs. Sandy Hammerl, 9520 19rh Street, a businesswoman, protested the ?s name change as an unnecessary disadvantage to small businesses and loss of future clients due to the inability of the public to locate Olive Street. A Planning Commission Ptinutcs -4- July 8, 1981 r. V' 1 i Clark Fioesen, 9529 19th Street, fel: the City Council could better r. spend their money. Further, the name change would create confusion and was of little historical significance. There being no additional comments, the public hearing was closed. threatened law- Commissioner Dat stated that he was at deal of eupense little swayed by suits; however, he indicated that theia verti wouldbe a re and associated materi- to businesses to have new letterhead, als printed with the new street name. He stated that the education would have to be changed by the Thomas Company and process for people to locate Olive Street would be considerable. e indicated that map. in the Yellow Pages would have to Atlas map makers and all advertising reflect this change In future directories, but would be in error for changed, all other. City streets approximately 6 months until the new editions were printed. Commis over street were .should also ed changed. Commissioner 'r Dahl stated that if. this street were to be Chang that are of historical significance this proposal. Dahl indicated that he was against with. Further, that most people Commissioner Sceranka in that he did not know whose history the Planning Commissionfi as dealit ing with extreme, easy to find by this know this street by radical or economic change. name. He felt that this was neither a P new Street Name Ordinance Commissioner Rempel stated that there is a on and that this change would be consistent with the yondnthee in the City Rancho He further stated that the numbered streets do not continue beyond policies and felt boundaries of. Upland and Ontario.. He felt that i anew city, implemented, over a period of time, it would Cucamonga should be consistent in its street naming P that if the. change was imp sire be accepted. Fie indicated further that the City should name its streets in its own way regardless of what other cities have done in the Past. opposed but if�oYe name individu- Commissioner Sceranka indicated that he was acPage a change was implemented it should bero done oseds a p ally as this name change has been p p reserving as much of in Cha man King indicated that he was inteble, butcdfelt that a street such as historical significance as was possible, historic, is a focal point within the community and should not he changed. 19z:h indicated that there was a definite problem with numbered streets lie that should be addressed. that the Planning, Motion: Moved b; Dahl, seconded by Sceranka, carried, r Council t 19th Street not be changed Commission recommend to the City negative impact on homes and businesses standpoint of advertising, reeducation of cl'ents to Olive Street because of the within the area from the si ndp to locate another Olive Street by fire and cost of readvertising in Yellow Pages and other vehicles an ecau�, for the of the negative impact of. trying it departments within the area, the confusi°Ttm?nt to create retainthe19th Street and the request by the State Highway Dep, name. July 8, 1981 ^lanning Commission Minutes -5- Commissioner Sceranka stated that it was important that the request by ehe Fire Department to retain the name of 19th Street be considered. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: DAHL, SCEPI-MU, KING NOES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY -carried- Commissioner Rempel stated Lhat to say the public is totally in opposi_ tion to this name change is not accurate. He proposed an amendment to the motion indicating that there are some people who would agree with the consistency in the name change and suggcrted that, staff be requested to study this and come back with a recommendati,3n. The motion for amendment died for lack of a second. Mr. Hogan stated that what the Commission has done is adopt a resolution denying the name change. Commissioner Dahl asked if Commissioner Rempel would make a motion to have staff look at other streets that should have name changes for historical and other reasons. Commissioner Sceranka stated he was opposed to such a motion, indicating that when the entire community is affected by name changes, an ad hoc citizens committee should be appointed to study such Pn issue and advise whether this is feasible. Notion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Sceranka, carried unanimously, that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council appoint a street naming Committee comprised of 1-2 Planning Commissioners, 1-2 City Council members, and the public, to review the City's street names and make appropriate recommendations. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, SCERANKA, DAHL, KING NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY -carried- * 8:00 p.m. The Planning Commission recessed. 8:10 P.m. The Planning Commission reconvened. Planning Commission Minutes -(- July 8, 1981 1 l E. ENVIRONI-IFNTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 10210 - LAWLOR - A custom lot subdivision of. 46 acres, into 38 lots comprising 36 units in the R-1-20,000 and R-1-14 acre zones generally located on the north side of Almond, between Sapphire and Turquclse - APN 200-191-07. Mr. Lam stated that because of a quirk in the zoning ordinance a zone change application must be submitted and requested that this iz�em be continued to the August 17, 1981 meeting. Chairman King opened the public hearing. There being no comments, the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Sceranka, carried unanimously, to continue this item to the P.upust 12, 1981 meeting. F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP NO. 5697 - WESTMONT PROPERTIES The divisiln of 33. 7 acres into 12 parcels for industrial use located north of 4th Street. and Santa Anita Avenue - APN 229-283-48. Senior. Civil Engineer. Paul Rougeau, reviewed tl_e staff report. He stated that at full build out it is anticipated there will be fewer employee-related hssinessfs than projected and therefore a narrower 7th Street wiSa full right -of-wa; is being provided for future widening of the street. ile indicated that some special conditions for 7th Street have been included on this parcel map. Commissioner Rempel asked if under item 7 this will be what the Planning CommisEion will consider in the resolution on sidewalks in the industrial area. Mr. Rougeau replied affirmatively- Commissioner Rempel asked, with one driveway approach per lot, when it is a subdivision, the Commission doesn't kr•tw what configuration of the site plan will he and would it be better to have the driveway installed until there is a site plcn because it is not all that difficult to saw out a chunk of curb. Chairman King opened the public hearing. Mr. J. Richard Newton, engineer/surveyor for this project, indicated that he was in full accord with staff's recommendations and Commissioner Rempel.' s comments. He stated that it was a good idea to have a curb in, especially where there was high water flowage. Mr. Newton stated that there was the possibility of putting in some retaining walls along the north end of the project and asked if this could be worked out with the Engineering Department. Planning Commission ?4inutes -7- July 8, 1981 t; Mr. Rcugeau replied that this can be worked out . There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed_ Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Dahl, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 81-78, incorporating, the comments made by Commissioner Rempel relative to curb improvements. G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP N0. 5882 - OAKVIEW - A division of 7.196 acres into 5 parcels with existing commercial u' building located at the southeast corner of 19th Street and Carnelian Avenue - APN 202-541-22. Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer, reviewed the staff report. 4 Chairman King opened the public hearing. Mr. . Rick Doolittle, representing the applicant, stated that he found the conditions of approval to be acceptable. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. i Motion: Moves: by Sceranka, seconded by Dahl, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 81-79, approvi-ig Parcel Map 6882 and issuing a negative declaration. H. INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN Mr. Tim Beedle, Senior Plauner, reviewed the staff report and discussed the contents of the Industrial Specific Plan. He indicated that the '• Planning Commission's comments and minor changes would be incorporated into the Plan in readiness for the final hearing at the next Planning !' Commission meeting. Further, that any substansive changes should be t. discussed by the Commission. Chairman King asked if the Planning Commission had any comments. There were none and the public hearing was opened. Mr. Jack Corrigan, representing the Daon Corporation, stated that the ` staff, and the Committee who worked -an this, have done a fantasti.c job. He indicated that a lot of time and effort has gone into this, the future 1a; guideline for industrial development in the City. Mr. Corrigan commented on the importance of having the highest requirements and standards stating that one can always back down on some that are too stringent but that t it is often difficult to add standards. He indicated that his company knows what is required up front and that it was i.mportantf:or others to know this as well. Mr. Corrigan stated that everyone who has worked on this Plan should be commended. Planning Commission Minutes -8- July 8, 1981 Mr. Jim Westling, representing O'Donnell, Brigham and Partners, currently developing the Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Center at Sixth and Milliken in the City, asked for support of the plan. He indicated that the Industrial Specific Plan provides a means for controlled development at a time when it is needed and guidelines are necessary. Further, that this Plan provides information to developers, retailers and the banking industry in order to make decisions. Mr. Michael 'Dodd, a owner of 20 acres of land In the industrial area, stated that he had attended the industrial plan meetings and was in full support of the Plan. He reiterated the comments made at the previous meeting by Commissioner Tolstoy, and Mr. Corrigan and Mr.. Westling, re- lative to the standards contained within the plan. He stated that these standards should be retained and not watered down and that he would not like specific circumstances to arise where they would be lessened for whatever reasons a particular developer might have. Chairman King, without closing the public hearing, asked the Commission for comments. Commissioner Dahl stated that this was a comprehensive document and saw very little on which he had questions. He indicated, however, some con- cern over the minimum landscape coverage use of a percentage for gross site. He further stated that he realized that this is a minimum figure but because there are different types of construction needed in the in- dustrial area there are differences in the needs of certain landscaping. He indicated that where there are large industrial tracts the landscaping required could amount to that of a park. Commissioner Dahl indicated that under the parking requirements, there should be some allowances made for compact cars. Mr. Beedle stated that this had been addressed and was covered under parking standard condition E-4. Mr. Beedle then stated that if he could speak for the Industrial Committee relative to the landscape standards, two different landscaping standards were provided and what was contained within the document was a compromise with less stringent standards for heavy industrial and rail served. He indicated that consistency was the major thrust in dealing with a plan of this nature.. Commissioner Rempel stated that the plan should require compact car parking spaces. Commissioner Rempel stated that relative to landscaping standards and the requirement of the percentage of landscaping, it may not always be appropriate, for example, for some of the interior portions of the site to have or need 15% coverage as required presently in the plan. Mr. . Rempel offered a "Herman parable" indicating that there may be so much emphasis on beautification that it may ultimately discourage small Planning Commission Minutes -9- July 8, 1981 N.;. businesses from developing within the industrial area. He stated that another factor that should be addressed is maintenance costs. He stated that having a requirement for 15% landscaping should not be a hard and fast rule. Further, that the reference to gross lot size and lanscaping must also be addressed. Commissioner Rempel stated that overall, the rest of the plan has a few corrections that he had already given to staff, however, relative to the radius of the track on spurs, felt that this should be a requirement of the PUC and not a requirement of the Plan. Chairman King asked Commissioner Rempel for his recommendation on land- scaping requirements. Commissioner Rempel stated that the Planning Commission should be able to require standards up to the minimum standards. Further, that flexi- bility should be provided in requiring a percentage landscape coverage. He felt that the requirements on interior lots might not have to be quite as stringent as they are on exterior streets or boulevards. Chairman King asked if he would like to see less stringent guidelines. Commissioner Dahl stated that he was in agreement with most of the plan but not with the 15% requirement as a maximum and that further, there may be times where it would be possible to require more than 15%. Mr. Beedle stated that one way to handle landscaping requirements would be to establish the percentages of subareas. Further, that the landscaping on past projects might be looked at in order to determine the appropriate level on landscape coverage. Commissioner Sceranka stated that the purpose of this document is to give a developer specific guidelines without having to come to Design Review in order to determine what is required. He indicated that going into specific subareas may be a better way of dealing with tbi.r but he was not sure. He was concerned that subarea 9 did not have appropriate landscape standards. He also stated that it was imperative to have a definition of gross site. Mr. Lam asked that the Commission not totally strike out the percentage method in determining the amount of landscaping. He used the example of the Coca-Cola site stating that it would be_ better if the requirements it are up front rather than later in the project. n Mr. Jack Corrigan stated that the purpose of the document is to let de- velopers know what will be expected of them if they develop in the City. He indicated that there may be problems within the Plan but they could i be amended. He indicated that the Commission may be making a problem of something that is not there. He stated further, that most cities work with a percentage figure in making landscaping determinations. .e4 Planning Commission Minutes -10- July B. 1981 Commissioner Dahl stated that he was not opposed to the percentage method but would like more clarification. Mr. Lam stated that there will be another hearing and that they could look at that approach to change the subareas and the type of development within each subarea. Mr. Lam further stated that both small and large parcels would be looked at to give some comparison and to begin seeing the relationship. Mr. Lam commented that the 10-15 percent standard had been around for a long time and thereis a ;:eason for its use by cities. He indicated that the percentage figure is needed because the biggest argument that devc1.opers have when they come into Design Review is how much landscaping must they have. Commissioner Rempel stated that he was very concerned that so far at this meeting only large developers have come forward and the fact that their sites are more related to business park and industrial park type complexes rather than large development units like "Pic and Save". He felt that there is quite a difference between the two, further, that the large unit developer may want to put landscaping into an atrium effect instead of around the building. Chairman King stated that staff should go back and work with the direction and criteria provided by the Commission and bring this back. Mr. Beedle stated that staff will bring back standards that address street frontages and also small and large busine3ses to give the Connnission the flavor of what could be possible as a _landscape requirement. Mr. Lam statcd that the Commission must remember that there is still flexibility i.n what will be adopted and that these are maximum standards that can always come down. Chairman King asked if there were any further comments from the audience. An unidentified woman asked what provisions there are within the document for dust control . The Planning Commission replied that there are none. Mr. Lam explained that on any development within the dust control area, a permit for grading must- be procured before the developer can go ahead with the site. This is handled by the County Agriculture Department, he stated. Further, that there is a dust control agency that oversees dust control in the City. i. Commissioner Dahl reiterated the arras of concern for the Planning Commission as the percentage of landscaping, the gross acres, and compact cars. Commissioner Sceranka stated that he would heartily endorse the Chamber's recommendation of having a minimum impact heavy industrial area in area 9. Planning Commission Minutes -11- July 8, 1981 �as Mr. Beedl.e indicated that the revised versioc wa-- included wit; the Draft Plan. Chairman King indicated that this had been advertised for the next Planning Commission meeting�July 22, 1981rand that this item be continued to that meeting. Motion: Moved by Rempcl, seconded by Dahl, carried unanimously, that this item be continued. 9:00 p.m. The Planning Commission recessed. 9: 10 p.n. The Planning Commission reconvened. NEW BUSINESS I. RESOLUTION SCTTINr STANDARDS FOR BUFFERING BETWEEN SINGLE FAMILY AND MULTIPLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENTS Mr. Lam provided background or_ the need for standards for the buffering between single family and multiple family developments and stated that Mr. Hogan would present a resolution for the Commission's consideration that would attempt to ameliorate some of the problems that exist in such situations. Mr. Hogan explained that the resolution contained within their packet contained four items: setback for two-story multiple units; setbacks for multiple family units exceeding two stories; buffering between single and mrltiple developments and the landscaping that should be contained within the jaffer. He indicated in talking to members of the Commission over the past week, it was felt that a waiver clause also be included that would be similar to what was included in the boulevard-equestrian standards resolution. He indicated that developers would have to apply for this in writing at the time the development came before the Planning Commission. Commissioner Sceranka stated that he would play the devil's advocate in that he agreed with what was being done but he did not feel that it was sensible or practical or meant anything to someone who lives next door to a 2-3-story building. He felt that there are two ways of communicating that the problem has been solved or have tried to solve it: one, through line of sigbt; and secondly, through saying that there would be no more wo-story units next to single family units. Mr. Hogan explained the reasoning of the setback requirements and how they mitigate. Commissioner Dahl asked if this would preclude buffering on those 3-story units that have already been accepted. Planning Commission Minutes -12- July 8, 1981 r' an replied that this does not prevent the Commission from requiring either- not t.her. M :. Hog tingle-story units but does not insist that this be done+ it would stated that the more he thought about this, Commissioner King justified on a line of sight basis or be very pleasing if this could be jis is a good if on a privacy basis. He indicated that felt that ltlwouId be g arid well justified argument that they g ive this could be put together. theycould with the setbacks and how Mr. +.iogan explained how he came up be justified. i• Commissioner Dahl asked if line of sight could be added i.n• it could he. Mr. Mogan rep:.ied that mitigated that the issue o privacy is being ' Commissioner Dahl. stated Review. and asked if that couldn't be handled through Desig -r s of minimum Mr, Hogan replied that this should be looked at in term standards Further., that be would rather come back with exhibits of what this will do- le-family residences that Mr. Lam explained that the resolution came about because of the concern '. expressed by the Commission when there are sing Were trying to nail this would se next to multiple family units. Hr_ indicated that there was no definition of what was wrong and right now they down. car. get all kinds of line of sight art of an apartment project, they Commissioner Rempel stated that they but if people see a two--st�.ry unit as P ed their concern will object and that fact Must this veleacknowledgeked if the Commission would conti.aue to he sway s problems even with this resolution. but felt that there would still he P c el was right adopted to see where it takes the Commissioner Dahl stated that he felt that Commi-ss eY�r emF but felt that the resolution should deli es forpdevelop commission as it is setting g had no objection to the resoleople through but reiterated that people Commissioner Rempel stated that h_ �artme.nt or condominium units when they and felt that it should be carried rtment would still object to two si want single-family residential unit, built next to theirs.responsibility his eu.-le- He realized, he Commissioner Sceranka stated that he believes that that this will be the case, but felt that there are serious Problems is to reduce the anxieties and to educate the p said, that must be resolved. -13- Planning Commission Minutes July 8, 1981 Mr. Lam stated that the resolution should uuL be adopted 'because it will not solve the things that it was thought it would solve. He indicated hat the two-story issue and that of views is just a part of what must be addressed. Iie indicated that the Commission might wish to consider that during hearings the issue of two-stories next to single-family homes is one of the mitigation features that the Commissi.on uses when such issues arise. Commissioner Dahl. stated that one point to consider is that this could be done by resolution to state that any developer who wishes to build multiple-family units in existing single-family residential areas must first meet with the people_ of the area and handle some of the problems in advance. This would eliminate a lot of problems for the Planning Commission. Commissioner Sceranka stated that he would like more done on line of sight. Motion: Moved by Sceranka, seconded by Dahl, carried unanimously, to continue this to July 22, 1981 to see what can be done. J. RESOLUTION ON SIDEtA'ALKS City Planner, Barry Mogan presented the staff report and indicated that he would like to add section 3, Sidewalks Elsewhere, that would state that sidewalks shall be required in all other parts of the City per City standards. Commissioner Sceranka asked about the specific plan areas. Mr. Hogan replied that this resolution would govern except for the planned community areas and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Commissioner Sceranka stated this would be so with the exception of where the planned communities, and specific plan areas have established specific standards. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Dahl, carried unanimously, to adapt Resolution No. 81-80 with the changes as recommended. EQUESTRIAN STANDARDS Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Sceranka, carried unanimously, to continue this item to the July 22, 1981 meeting. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS Planning Commission Minutes -14- July S, 1981 i,V Cha'itman King stated that the following committee appointmentr, have been made for the 1981-82 year. - Jeff Sceran:ca (January 182) Design Review - Berman Rem?el (January '83) - Richard Dahl (Alternate) - Richard Dahl Equestrian Advisory Committee - Peter T.:lstoy (Alternate) - Jeffrey King Flood Control Committee - Peter Tolstoy - Herman Rempel Zoning Committee - Richard Dahl - Pete- Tolstoy (Alternate> - Peter Tolstoy Ltiwanda Advisory Committee - Richard Dahl (Alternate) All other committees wera eliminated. a'. 1. ADJo�NT el, seconded by Dahl, carried unanimously, to Rem �1 Motion: moved by P adjourn. 9:40 p.m. The Planning Commission adjourned. Respectfully submitted, JACK LAM, Secretary Planning Commission Minutes -15- 3uly 8, 1981 0 PLA14NING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting July 22, 1981 CALL TO ORDER Vice-chairman, Herman Rempel., called the Regular City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission Meeting of July 22, 1981, held at the Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, to order at 7:02 p.m. He then led in the pledge to the flag. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: Richard Dahl, Jeff Sceranka, Herman P.empel ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Jeffrey King, Peter. Tolstoy (both excused) STAFF PRESENT: Shintu Bose, Associate Civil Engineer; Edward Hopson, Assistant City Attorney; Otto Krouti.l, Associate Planner; Joan Kruse, Administrative Secretary; Jack Lam, Director of Community Development; Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer; Michael Vairin, Senior Planner APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the February 5, 198). rieeti.ng were held over to the August. 12, 1981 meeting in order to allow the absent Commissioners an opportunity to vote on them. ANNOUNCEMENTS Mr. Lam, Director of !'vnnnunity Development, advised that the General Plan printing has been completed and the General. Plan is available for distri- bution. He then presented the members of the Planning Commission with a copy. Mr. Lam further advised that information copies for the public were available for review at the public library and City Ball and copier, were also available for purchase. Mr. Lam announced that the Citizens Advisory Committee would meet on July 23, 1981 at 7 p.m. at the Lion' s Park Counnunity Building. Ile indicated that the public was invited to attend this meeting. Mr. Lam advised that on July 29, 1981. a meeting is scheduled between the Marlborough Development Corporation and residents in the immediate vicinity of Marlborough's proposed project to discuss points of consideration prior to the next scheduled City Council meeting. Mr. Lam requested that Item "J", Redevelopment Report, be added to this agenda under Director's Reports. He indicated that this report will provide a review of action to date of the redevelopment project and what will be required of the Planning Commission. I . I CONSENT CALFNDA- A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPIENT REVIEW NO. 81-21 - D.W.G. ASSOCIATES - A development of two industrial buildings totaling 86,564 square feet on 5.27 acres of and in the M-2 zone to be located on the northeast corner of J rsey Boulevard and Vincent Avenue. APN 209-141-42. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Scera. ks, carried unanimously., to adopt the Consent Calendar. . AYES: COMMISSIONERS: DAHL, .;CERANKA, REITEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: KING, 'OLSTOY -carried- PUALIC HEARINGS B. VARIANCE NO. 81-02 - CHRISTIAN - Req, est to permit construction of residence that will czcroach into front and rear yards on a 3,532 square foot lot in lice R-2 zone. loc€ted at 6969 Amethyst. APN 202- 1.31-J4. Mr. Lam stated that this item was continues from a prior meeting in order that a determi.natien could be made as to tie legality of the lot split. He indicated that at this point there had been no word from the applicant and requested that this item be postponed to tie August 12 meeting. Assistant City Attorney Hopson, stated that a meeting is scheduled between the applicant, the applicant's attorney, ani himself on July 23 regarding the original plorti.ng of the lot. Vice-chairman Rempel opei.•id the publik hear:.ng. There being no comments, the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Sceranka, carried unanimously, to continue this item to the August 12. 1981 Planning Commission meeting. C. REVIEW THE DRAFT E.I.R. AND CONSIDER APIROVAL Or TILE DRAFT INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN IJITII REVISIONS - The Specific Plan consists of detailed land use regulations and standards for dev^lopment in the industrial area. Public hearing will be held to take public comment on the Draft Environmental Imapct Report and consider recommendation for adoption of the Draft Industrial Specific Plan wish any necessary revisions. ! I Planning Commission Minutes -2- July 22, 1981 II Mr. Tim Beedle, Senior Planner, reviewed the staff report. He indicat d ( that he had ,,rovided addendums t-) the Industrial Specific Plan and also a letter frtn: the Department of Transportation relative to the EIR for Mr.. Beedle stated that th(: public- hearing would be opened for th Plan. review the EIR and the Draft Industrial Specific Plan. Further, that there had been a redefinitio.l of subrrea 9 to include the Industrial. ..)Iwittee modification of certain develorment standards to reflect the nature of Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial land use category. Mr. Beedle en explained the changes to the ccnditior =or building heights above then z a Cu-,, and the pro . .. ons for master planning 75 feet to be approved a of developments 4C acres or larger for contiguous property. Commissioner Sceranka asked for clarification of the proposed changes for master plannim developments of a large size. Mr. replied hat if at the or largerP t ime of a parcel, amaster plan t on that parcel bwould ibe required. Mr. Beedl pointed out that a master plan may still be requireO.. on smaller parccis when considered by the Development Review Committee. Commissioner Rempel questioned the landscaping percentage definition and the definition of net building area. Mr. Beedle explained that net building is from the property l.in.�. Vice-chairman Rempel stated that it would not include landscaping in the right-of-way. Commissioner Dahl stated that he is having a problem with the day it is written and asked if it could be clarified better. Mr. Lam stated that the definition could be changed to either lot or site area. Commissioner Sceranka asked if that was including or excluding net acreage. Mr. Beedle replied that i.t would include the setback area within the property line. There being no further comments, Vice chairman Rempel opened the public_ hearing. Mr. Chuck Caldwell, owner of 84 acres at Haven and Eighth Street, stated lie did not reall} understand about the master planning requirement for property 40 acres or more, and asked if this would be necessary for all future projects before something could be approved. Mr. Beed explained the definition to Mr. Caldwell, indicating there are some provisions that may be waived in the master plan requirements on very large parcels. Planning Commission Minutes -3- July 22, 19P1 -N Mr. Caldwell asked whetter the master plan is locked ill. Mr. Bredle replied that some master plan requirements can be modified later in the development. process. Mr. Caldwell asked about landscaping requirements in the public right- of-way easements. Mr. Reedle replied that if it is still part of his property and ownership, he would bear respinsibility, for this Landscaping. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Dahl stated that this is an excellent document and with the changes that have been suggested, it was his opinion that the Commission has a document chat can be recommended to the City Council for approval and adoption, and commended everyone for a job well done. Commissioner Sceranka commented on the statement from the Department of Transportation Planning oa the Draft EIR, point No. 2, and addressed a statement to the Engineering Department that Department of Transportation is sayirg more negative things about a freeway interchange at Seventh Street and 1-1.5. He asked that this be checked by the Engineering Depart- mer.t. Commissioner Dahl stated that one thing the City can be certain of is that there will be changes with Caltrans as time goes on. He further stated that he would not want to preciude any possibilities down the line and wanted to have it addressed if there is the possibility that we will -^t that interchange. He stated that it would be in our best interest to press on and try to get that interchange and hoped that in the future there would be more cooperation between local government and Caltrans. Commissioner Sceranka stated that this is a very long involved process in the development of an ordinance and to bear in mind that this is a document that will change In the future. As a city, he stated, they have worked very hard in rrder to abate the fears of the approval process and what will be expected of developers in the industrial area. He expressed his congratulation; to staff and all those who worked on the plan and felt that it will be a useful tool in getting the correct kind of development in the City. Vice-chairman Rempel voiced his agreement with the other commissioners and included his thanks to staff for a job well done. Commissioner P,empel stated that there has been a paragraph added on landscaping relative to the percentage requirement on the net site that would allow the Planning Comnission to make modifications when it felt they are necessary and when they are consistent with land use. He read the paragraph stating that chose areas where there was high visibility would be required to have the full standard. Planning Commission Minutes -4- Ju?y 22, 1981 Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Sceranka, carried unanimously, to adopt the Planning Commission resolution.,J tb amendments and recommend approval and adoption of the EIR and Draft Industrial Specific Plan by the City Council. AYES: COM24ISSIONERS: DAHL, SCERANKA, REMPEL NOES: COMMISSIOI4ERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: KING, TOLSTOY -carried- D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND 'TENTATIVE TRACT 9658 - MC CUTCHAN - A total residential development of 26 lots consisting of 52 single family residential dwelling units arranged as duplexes on 6.92 acres of land in the R-2 zone on the north side of 9th Street, between Baker and Madrone Avenue. APN 207-261-03. Senior Planner, Michael Vairin, reviewed the staff report. Commissioner Dahl asked for the definition of R-2 zoning as clarification to the application. Mr. . Vairin replied that R-2 zoning allows two units on one parcel. Mr. Vairin indicated that this project has certain minimum size lots which have been designed specifically for it. Commissioner Dahl asked what a minimum size parcel is. Mr. Vairin replied that it is 8000 square feet or less. Commissioner Dahl asked what the lot sizes are just before the church at the north end of this property. Mr. Vairin replied that they are 84 feet wide and 132 feet deep. He further stated that by code they muss: be minimum of 8000 equare feet. Commissioner Sceranka asked that the width of the street be pointed out and whether the right-of-way will go through. Mr. Rougeau replied that there would be a 60-foot total right-of-way. Commissioner Dahl asked if the cul-de-bnc meets the Fire Department requirements. Mr. Rougeau replied that it does, and that this type has been proposed on several. projects. Further, that the depth of the street is considered as standard. Mr. Rougeau also stated that secondary access would come from Baker Street. Vice chairman Rempel opened the public hearing. i e, a Planning Commission Minutes -5- July 22, 1981 Mrs. Miller, a resident of Rancho Cucamonga, stated that she was a property owner holding equity in the Cask'n'Cleaver restaurant, and objected to this development because of another proposed development in which she had an interest which would conflict c � , the McCutchan application. Mr. John March, resident on Madrone Avenue, objacte `o the size of the residences proposed on this project, asking tha-. it parcels are 8000 square feet, what the house --ize would be. He felt they are too small and should be equally as large as those present] Baker. Street. Mr. John Bell, pastor of the church next to this proper. indicated that this project proposed to take the cul-de-sne out m . Le church property and stated that they did not have enough proper-y to do this and had no interest in selling any portion of the church property to accommodate the cul-de-sac. Mr. Bell objected to this project additionally because of increased impacts on schools which would be caused by the density of the project and the potential of more children_ Mr. Ray Trujillo, representing the Cucamonga School District, indicated that there is no access to Baker Street and this was a concern to the district as well. Mr.. Trujillo expressed concern for the density of this project but stated :hat the district had not yet had the opportunity to examine the project plans and would address the question of density at a later. time. Vice-chairman Rempel stated th :t the School District will have an opportun- ity to address school capacity and whether there will be sufficient classroom space as a result of t::is project. He further stated that in keeping with the growth management ordinance, a school certification letter for capacity would be required before any building could commence. Mr. Tom McCutchan, applicant, 265 San Gabriel Boulevard, Pasadena, stated that his initial. intent was to provide affordable housing and that it was a presumption that there will be a lot of children as a result of this project. He further stated that he felt there would be fewer children and could not debate at this meeting whether the project belongs here or not. He indicated that what he has is a project that is consistent with the zoning of the area. Mr. McCutchan asked about Conditions No. 1 and 8 relative to landscaping, requesting that they be deleted because they would add substantially to the cost of the units and should be left to the prerogative of the home- owner. Mr. McCutchan then asked about Site Approval Condition No. 6 regarding roof material. Mr. Vairin explained that the City wants to be sure that the types ap'? grade of roof material is architecturally good. Mr. Vairin replied further that the conditions relative to landscaping t' were necessary in order for this project to ro p j pass the point ratio , system and it was pointed out that there are two property owners on one lot r with common yard space so it ws ; very +mportont t;iat landscaping details :: . Planning Commission Minutes -6- July 22, 1981 :;r be included. Further, that the conditions which Mr. McCutchan questioned were necessary to also pass the solar heating portion of the rating. Mr. McCutchan, counenting on Engineering Condition No. 3, stated that lie had a draft proposed that would change the dedication on Ninth Street and read it into the record. Mr. Rougeau repl.i.ed that with a little additional change this would be acceptable from the Engineering point of view and that this could be reworded to fit the alternative presented by Mr. McCutchan. Commissioner. Sceranka asked if both Mr. McCutchan and Mr. Rougeau were saying that the dedication should be 60 feet. Mr. Vairin replied that all they were saying, is that it should be and they did not say which way. Mr. McCutchan stated that he had one comment on what Mrs. Miller proposed to do and indicated that if there is a legitimate offer to him, it would be seriously considered from a business point of view. Mr. Bell commented on the amount of traffic that occurs on Madrone Avenue in the morning and he asked that something be done to alleviate it at this junction. Further, that there had been a promise from the County that this would be straightened out. Mr. Bell commented that with two families on a 8000 square foot lot, this would be a trash dump. Commissioner Sceranka asked when the improvements on Vineyard would take place and whether they would include Arrow at Vineyard. Mr. Rougeau explained the EPA sanctions and whether they would be lifted, indicating that when this is improved traffic signals are proposed. He further indicated however, that improvement will only go down to 8th Street. Mr. Bell asked for the definition of affordable housing. Mr. Lam replied by providing him with the definition that was approved in the General Plan. There was discussion on the price of the units proposed. Commissioner Sceranka asked if there was a problem in locating housing units close to a restaurant. Mr. Hopson, Assistant City Attorney, replied that lie hoped not because his place of business is located next door to a restau-ant and if that were the case, it would have to be shut down. Further, that there is no problem in State, County, or City law. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Planning Commission Minutes -7- July 22, 19R1 �tk; Commissioner Dahl commented that from what he could see, the appearance of these units is better than those of a single-family residence in the 7<00 square foot range. He stated that he did not have a problem with impact of the area from the standpoint of appearance. He further stated that 'schools should not be a problem because of the City's growth management program and was sure that there would be space for children. He agreed with staff on land- scaping because there was assurance that it would look nice and there- fore be maintained. Commissioner Dahl stated that he would like to have an opportunity to see the roof material. Mr. Vairin replied that this project can be conditioned to go back to Design Review or come back to the Planning Commission. Commissioner Dahl. stated that he would like to see it go back to Design Review. Commissioner Sceranka stated his concurrence and indicated .that he would like to see this go back to Design Revie•:; however, he felt that this will be an attractive and good addition to the City. Further, in terms of product type and impact on surrounding uses, housing must be provided close to the areas where people may work and that the City is trying to encourage this kind of policy. He felt that the traffic problems could be alleviated and it was up to the school district to make a decision on impact. Vice-chairman Rempel stated that the Commission is constantly talking about conserving energy and to do less driving. Further, he was not saying that there would be fewer children in this project but there probably will be and this project would put children near a school and church and give the moderate-income family a place to purchase.. Mr. Rempel stated that if nothing else, the church should welcome children into the community instead of pushing them away. Commissioner Dahl commended Mr. Trujillo for taking the time to come to the Planning Commission meeting. Motion: Moved by Sceranka, seconded by Dahl, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 81-83, approving, Tentative Tract No. 9658, with the recommended conditions of approval. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: SCERANKA, DAIS., REMPEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: KING, TOLSTOY Planning Commission Minutes -8- July 22, 1981 f::. 8:25 P-m The Planning Commission recessed. 8:40 P.m• The Planning Commission reconvened. t * * * - The Planning COMission _ IXWIS PROPERTIES E, DIRECTOtt RE�IZEW N0- 7a Chang e in the Conditions of Approval for shall be considering the development of a professional center to include a two-story office building totaling 33,696 square feet. ? reviewed the staff report. Mr. Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engiueer, l opened the public hearing. { Vice-chairman Rempe owner at 9150 Roberts Amethyst, also a property development. Mr. Paul Williams, he Am public access into this Court, one up vandalism in the area stated that he did not wish any He further stated that tnce the wall has g that a cul-de-sac was not needed at this street. has g at 9549 Roberds, was Mr. Wayne. Dennis, 231. S. Euclid, owner of property opposed to the cul.-de-sac stating that Roberds is cleaner. because. it stops people who the not belong there from coming through- people Amethyst, also repesenting her husband and Mrs. Mrs. Lily Wagers, prevents intruders from Roberds,Lil was ,Yposed to a cul-de-sac because it coming through. 7251 Amethyst, stated that the Commission ba heard Mrs- Diane Williams, on Roberds Court in opposition to the propose from the entire owners hiI cul-de-sac. was closed. There being no further comments, the Public hearing spoke against this ag Commissioner Sceranka a agreed thanked those who reed that for taking the time to Present their views and stated that there is no need to put the cul-de-sac in- he was in but in view of what has been said, Commissioner Dahl. stated that when he first looked at t -s+ he agreed favor of the cul-de-sac, with the residents- problem with senior citizens roviding access to Base Line. He Vice-chairman Re'npel stated that thereid le c walk on Base Line and it and othzrs who live further up place forpeople one on record in many indicated that there is no P is dangerous. Purthei, that the Commission ha.. K problem and what the instances to get secondary access when there is a P doing is negating a philosophy. He stated that the Planning Commission is right when they put on that condition and it is still Commission was rig correct. July 22, 1981 Planning Commission Minutes -9- Mr. 14illiams stated that residents currently have problems with some of the older, senior, residents of the rest home and further stated that the problem would be compounded if the cul-de-sac was permitted. Following brief discussio:i, it was moved by Sceranka, seconded by Dahl, carried, to adopt Resolution No. 81-84 amending the conditions of Director Review 79-68 requiring a cul-de-sac for Parcel flap 5545. Vice-chairman Rempel voted no, stating that. --iblic access should be maintained at this location. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: SCERANKA, DAHL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: KING, TOLSTOY -carried- * * •k * * F. .ZZITA L - (Reference Tentati•-e Tract 11550 and Zone Change No. 80-11) - Consideration and review of an Environmental Impact P.eport (EIR) prepared for a residential condominium project con- sisting c.f 662 dwelling units on 65 acres of land generally located on the south ^ide of Wilson, about i mile east of Haven. APN 201- 191-07. Mr. Michael Vairin, Senior Planner, and Otto Kroutil, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report and EIR and asked the Planning Commission to look at the EIR carefully to see if the impacts are addressed fully and adequately and, if so, to make a recommendation of certif:.cation to the City Council. Mr. Vairin also asked that the revised site plan be ex- amined to see if this is the direction that the Commission had intended. Mr. Kroutil reiterated that the purpose of this meeting was to look at the EIR and not to have any formal action on the project itself. He asked that any additional measures towards mitigation be forwarded to the City Council.. Further, that through the reduction in this project's density, there would be mitigation to some degree of many of the concerns expressed relative to this project. Mr. Kroutil staged that in staff's review of the EIR, it was felt that in general it addressed those areas that needed to be covered. However, he added that input has been receivtd from several agencies and individu- als, and as a result, staff is recommending additional mitigation measures before the Focused E.L.R. is forwarded to the City Council. These include measures in the areas of project density, traffic and circulation, and project compatibility. Mr. Kroutil recommended that visual consolidation of open space be considered as well as conditions to be sure that water quality is met. Although the impacts on air quality, loss of natural vegetation, fire services, and recreational service would be increased, staff felt that they would not be significant eaourh individually, but that they should be looked at as a whole. Planning Commission Minutes -10- July 22, 1981 P . t Vice-chairman Rempel opened the public hearing. Mr. Larry Wolff, architect for this project, stated that both he and the t owner feel comfortable the staff report. He indicated that his or the past 4-6 office has been odifying the forsite plan the input from months from Mr. King, who prepared the expressed his appreciation EIR on this project.. Mr. Wolff stated that this project is a great deal more flexible than what had been proposed originally because of the decreased density and the change in the type of. units. He indicated that some three-story units, single family along Wilson, and two-story units are now incorporated into the plan and that the three-story units would contain subterranean parking. Ile spoke to Commissioner Toistoy's concern for open space and 'I stated that because of the change in unit design and the use of three- story structures, the feeling of open space was acc(implished. lie indicated that his firm was fairly open-minded about the final design structures, but that they would like more time in which to soften. the look of the three-story buildings. Commissioner Rempel asked where the stadium was in relation to the project site. Mr. Wolff replied that it was approximately 3/5 of the way down and was surrounded by the athletic field and maintenance. Mr. Rempel askei how many units are being shown. Mr. Wolff re,)lied that it is just under 8 units per acre for a total of approximatci_y 520 units. Mr. Roger Sudduth, 5695 Canistel, Rancho Cucamonga, stated that h•� would confine his comments to the EIR indicating that several months ago r. Commissi.oner. Tolstoy addressed the cumulative impacts of the Neeva Tract on t..- entire area and felt that they had not been sufficiently looked at in the Draft EIR. He indicated that the traffic situation was not adequately examined especially in the area of Haven and Wilson. PIr. t?, Sudduth also took issue with the number of students that were projected and indicated that he felt that this had been understated. Mr. Sudduth expressed his concern for safety of the people who ride horses and live in the Deer Creek area who would be affected by the Neeva Tract. Further., that there was no mention of horses and their impact in this report. He asked if consideration could be given to t}. openin,^, a street at the south end of the tract to siphon off traffic that would constrict the current roads that serve the Deer Creek tract, although he understood the economic_ difficulty of doing this in the first phase of development. i Mr. Sudduth stated his concurrence with staff suggestions relative to However, he added, that the residents of Deer project compatibility. Creek would like to avoid excessive heights of buildings in the northern end of the tract. Mr. Sudduth indicated that there was no issue with 1' 1981 Planning Commission Minutes -11- July 22, thp_ line of sight in the building shown some 300 feet south of Wilson on a 7-8 percent grade, but asked consideration for the concentration of three-story buildings to occur on the southern portion of this site. On the issue of fire safety, water quality, ,j.nd recreation, Mr. Sudduth felt that staff leas shown a great concern and was confident that the Planning Commission would as well. Mr. Sudduth commended both staff and the Commission for their effort and stated that the residents of Deer Creek very much liked th- plan presented by Mr. Wolff this evening. Commissioner. Sceranka stated that he v-s not sure what Mr. Sudduth meant on his 1ioint of cumulative impact of the EIR. Mr. Sudduth explained that they had been sub-optimizing inasmuch as there are presently some 300 acres approved for development at Deer Creek and all of the units and the proposed Neeva Tract will add to the traffic at Wilson. He stated that they are only asking that whatever assumptions are made are made relative to those things that were not assessed in the Draft E.T.R. The population at Deer Creek has increased and it is expected to increase further and this would be an impact on this area. Commissioner Sceranka asked. Mr. Sudduth if his view to the south was Impaired by this proposed project. Mr. Sudduth stated that there would be no problem as far as he was con- cerned. The only problem would be the traffic problem. Commissioner Sceranka asked what route do the horses take through Deer Creek now. Mr. Sudduth explained the original six miles of trail and that currently there are nine miles of trails and the use of street easements for the animals to walk on. However, Mr. Sudduth explained, that the horse population has increased substantially since the last hearing on this project. Mr. Jim DesLauriers, biology teacb,:r at Chaffey College, explained '-be nature area that is the only one of its kind in the area. Re pointed out that wit), further development, this area would be difficult to keep in its present state. He spoke of the destruction of the aLea caused by the intrusion of youngsters who were not aware of w-iat this area is and asked consideration for some kind of fencing along the north side that would help to preserve this area from further ±ntrusions. Mr. C. Roshan, 11028 Wilson Avenue, who stated he was a horse owner, spoke of the difficulty for horses and cars to get along and the increased traffic that will result from this project. He asked that the Banyan entrance land extension be put in as quickly as possib".e. Planning Commission Mintues -12- 3uly 22, 1987. t1, ' . r M Canis tel, expressed Isis r. Bob Glennon, 5575 concern for his three the increased traffic. Ile explained that children who ride horses and andle a horse spooked by traffic, it is while an adult may be able to h (; difficult for a child to do the same. Commissioner Sceranka asked why Mr. Glennon had purchased his home in Deer Creek. n-ori ause it was eqesta Mr- anted hisechildrenatoihavesthecopportunity touride horsesented and he wa ents, the public hearing was closes. There being no further comm Mr. Wolff stated for clarification that he wanted to develop the eight first phase the single—family homes first and that as far as the Wilson side of the project was concerned, he felt that 70 homeess would be t was resdets of Der a compromise. Further, thatfactars iuonot hbeinge bl.eitondevel pesouth Creek realized the economic first and developing off of Wilson in the beginning. Mr. Wolff indicated that fie was glad of the response to the proposal of three-story buildings. He explained the site plan and the variety that plan. Mr. hw,ing several different heights would afford to the ov in protecting the Wolff. stated his w'_ '.lingoess to work with the college open space and nature area indicating that both the college and project had a similar problem. Commissioner Dahl commented on the equestrian problems and stated that ° the Planning Commission had set up an Equestrian Advisory Committee to studv each project to be sure that there was access and compatibility. Further, that the new General Plan addresses this and the area of Wilson has been marked as a community trail with Banyan as well. He indicated that nothing will be done with the Neeva project until the Committee has had an opportunity to look at the project for safety factors. are Dahl expressed his apprecia�ion that Mr.. Wolff. was willing to the numbrof threestaffysand units proposalthe on thethern Elli andnstatedf that eeachated hisagreementwith item should be looked at strongly. Commissioner Sceranka stated that he agreed with- the comments made in- cluding those of the residents. Be indicated that there would be dis- cussion th the site plan and staff's recommendations and feltstagy th recommendation for addi.tionaI. mitigation measures were adequate. s project is Vice-chairman Rempel stat�d that s'etherto He indicated arge ethat ithe people Of the result of people working Deer Creek, Chaffey College and the developer have made great strides in getting things done. tie indicated) hindagreee tt withethe staff Report and with concerns that they heard, would adequately mitigation measures, as outlined in the Staff. Reo. =t> address any problems. Planning Commission Minutes 3uly 22, 1981 Motion: Moved by Sceranka, seconded by Dahl, carried unanimously to adopt Resolution No. 81-85 and the Draft EIR recommending certification to the City Council with additional mitigation measures as noted. Mr. Sudduth asked if the EIR and conditons would be modified as suggested. Mr. Froutil stated that it would huc that there was to be clarification of the phasing on this project as it was rather loose at this point. Vice-chairman Rempel stated that Mr. Wolff was willing to work somewherF between the 60 and the 80 units in the first phase before the Banyan extension must be put in, and asked if the residents would agree with that. Commissioner Sceranka stated that not everything would be done at the stage of the Environmental Impact Report and that the site plan would both answer a lot of concerns and present some new questions. However, he felt that with the mitigation measures proposed, this would be worked out. * * * * * 10:00 p.m. The Planning Commission recessed. 10: 10 p.m. The Planning Commission reconvened. OLD BUSINESS RESOLUTION SL.TING STANDARDS FOR BUFFERING BETWEEN SINGLE FAMILY AND MULTIPLE PAMILY yEVELOPMENTS Motion: Moved by Sceranka, seconded by Dahl, carried unanimously, to continue this .item indefinitely. NEW BUSINESS H. RESOLUTION ON EQUESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE STANDARDS Mr. Lam stated that these standards would formalize the guidelines for the operation of this Committee. He indicated that if the Planning Commission felt that it addresses the type of administrative regulations that is wishes for this Committee, then it should adopt the Standard. Commissioner Sceranke asked if there is any problem wish a Councilman not being the chairman of this committee. Crnincilman Jim Frost replied that he did not think it important that a City Council member is not chairing this Committee as it is a Planning Commission function. He indicated, however, that the City Council would Planning Commission Minutes -14- July 22, 1981 be concerned with the selection of the individual icho sits on the committee and recommended that the Standards reflect that the Council will make its own selection as to who their representative will bc. Commissioner Dahl stated that he agreed and felt that the Standards should be changed to state that the Council would make its own selection. Motion: Moved by Sceranka, seconded by Dahl, carried unanimously, to adopt standards for the Fquestrina Advisory Cossnittee with an amendment reflecting that the selection of City Council representative be made by the City Council. 1. VACATION OF 7TH STREET AT CENTER Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer, reviewed the staff report. Commissioner Dahl asked if we know the property boundary on the south side of Seventh Street. Mr. Rougeau replied yes, that you can see a tax code line and that they own it to the north property line. Commissioner Sceranka stated that he has a lot of mixed feelings about this particular parcel. He asked if there was any possibility that Seventh Street will. ever go through, if it went across Deer Creek. Mr. Rougeau replied by explaining the present right:-of-way and agreements Chet exist from Schue Manufacuring and the dedications that have already been made on the parcel map. Commissioner Sceranka asked why Seventh Street is thought to be important if it is not in any of the City's plans. Commissioner Rempel stated that the properties are really not very deep and with a lot of properties fronting on Center or Turner. , he really doesn' t see that they will be dividing in that direction. Commissioner Sceranka asked if the potential for Seventh Street is bigger than a local. Mr. Rougeau replied that they do not see it as being larger than a local but it would still be used for traffic. Commissioner Sceranka stated that he did not feel that the City would ever spend money for a bridge for a local project and dial not know if the city would be able to fund a bridge across Deer Creek; therefore, he did not feel there was any reason to maintain this. right-of-way. Planning Commission Minutes -15- July 22, 1981 Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Sceranka, carried unanimously, to instruct staff to start proceedings for the vacation of. Seventh Street. J. REDEVELOPMENT REPORT Mr. Lam spoke of the Redevelopment Agency and the Planning Commission's role. He indicated that the actions on the Redevelopment Agency would come up quite quickly at the next several meetings. Mr. . Lam advised of the selection of Municipal Services, Inc. , as consultants and their obligation to prepare for the adoption of a Redevelopment Plan by December 31, 1981. Mr_ Lam stated that at the last meeting, the City Council approved the contract with M.S.I. and also selected Best, Best and Kreiger as the consulting attorneys, with John Brown, as the attorney the City will be working with. 'rhe Council also adopted the redevelopment survey area. Mr. . Lam advised that the consultant will prepare a preliminary redevelop- ment plan and the redevelopment area for the August 12 meeting and thaw an effort will be made to provide this material to the Commission before that meeting. Commissioner Sceranka asked why the area at Grove and Foothill to the Red Hill Coffee Shop was left out. Mr. Lam explained that the current area does not preclude other areas from being included in the future. He indicated that the consultant priorit- ized the areas which were felt to be most important considering the tight time frame. Mr. Lam stated that these areas will be considered in the future and they have tried to make the first steps simple so that they would be successful in their first attempt. Commissioner Sceranka asked how far the survey area went and if this goes to Archibald Avenue. Mr. Lam rc,plied that it goes to San Bernardino Road. The intent, he said, was to exclude as much of the public areas and housing as was possible. Mr. Lam stated that he wished to impress on the Planning Commission that when this comes before them, they must be ready to make recommendations. ADJOIWIMENT Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Sceranka, carried unanimously, to adjourn. FF 1d:35 p.m. The Planning Commission Adjourned. 1,r ; ' Planning Commission Minures _1E.. July 22, 1981 1 ' ! 77v v i. 1 • M1 Io• submitted,Respectfully w r. JACK LW, Secretary �i.i. rl\'• �u �� Iy I ! -5 a. v I r �i «, ,f\ Y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA c�R�O ST"F REPORT r DATE: October 14, 1981 0 0 TO: Members of the Planning Commission v �> FROM: Jack Lan, AICP, Director of Community Development 1977 BY: Dan Coleman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 1157? - LANDMARK - A custom of subdivision of 1 .5 acres into 7 ots in the R-1 zone, generally located on the west side n Turner Avenue, south of Base Line Road - APN 1077-04,-58. BACKGROUND", The attached letter from Landmark Consultants requests a one-year extension of the above-described project. Original ap provai for Tentative Tract 11577 was granted on November 26, 198: therefore, toe project expires on November 26, 1981 . The approved Tentative Map is shown on the attached Exhibit "B". The applicant is requesting an extension based upon delays in obtaining approval of improvement plans and the need to coordinate improvements with the projr:ct to the south. This project currently has plans sub - mitted e- the Engineering Division for plan check at this time. RECOMMENDATION: It is recormended that an eighteen-month extension he granted for Tentative "tract No. 11577 to run from the present expiration date of November 26, 1981 to May 26, 1983. I Res Pectfu y bmit d, I jack Lam, AICP Community Development Director JL.;1C:jk Attachments: Letter from Landmark Consultants Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Tentative Tract Map NO ITEM A LANDMARK CONSULTANTS UPLAND.CAUF RNIAB 786 — CIVIL ENGINEERS TELEPHONE:714/981-5602 September 22, 1981 h I C U CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA City of Rancho Cucamonga COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. Community Development Dept. S P O Box 807 EP 22 1981 Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 AM PM Att1?- Michael Vairin 716191101%1211121u14A6 Re: Extension Request for Tract 11577 A Dear Mr. Vairin, We hereby apply for a one year extension. The Sixty Ior�°� Two dollar request fee is enclosed. r� This extension is needec to obtain approvals on the improvement plans and to coordinate improvements on Turner Avenue with the project to the south. Very Truly Yours, Landmark r .nsultants, Inc. Terrance A. Lane JN: 79-17 �e y aTjiw '•r•Rev DESIGNERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS ��? i- Q i 1 Y �I S-r.pif Fo//y JNomC3 1 � /�obi!G' NomC Pd'K IQ C.fr✓s Giwe I t 1 � f.�„rsf/ink --- ---� t —50QrRacJius Lines �. ti q_i � SC c if r!�/r7ri i �d VG//r✓a 1� � 1 E .,. ;31 R,fI i 5'-,Vale i<.i :%y i 1 1 LJ�/✓� ���IOVG ,C I f MOTPS VVHIDIT 1 - 1 1 1 1 ' 9 BAOELIME RM -T� 1 Y� \1. IflCl/WUCAs Ot ¢.• _ •.S )� ��[+ �/.T=�� I i'. Yi Al CA LCDTTi:5�j •.an. L_J lsih 3 FORTH CITY OF [Teal: 'r 1l6 7'7 RANCHO CUCA,TMONrA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISIOti1 ;?: �, CITY OF RANCHO C CAMONGA 'CA ?A, STAFF R-14 PORT a l O O y Ix DATE: October 14, 1981 0 a 1977 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall , Engineering Technician SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION REQUEST FOR PARCEL MAP NO. 5733 - MCNAY I The attached l-tter from Mary McNay requests a one year extension to record Fsrcel Map 5733 to allow additional time to complete a contract sale. Parcel Map 5733 was originally given tentative approval by the City Engineer on March 17, 1g80 for a period of 18 months. The one year extension would extend tentative approval to September 17, 1982. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that a one year extension of time be granted for Parcel Mar 5733. i Respectfully submitted, LB .8K:jaa Attachment ITEM B ,.ids jt I ,• ,±J •'ids -ZA ff_ y 1 I , .nn.ri ..rv.0 •J —E�li e a 1 � • � Mehl 3 e � od I o I k --- '•f � add �: �. rnlows b Z � �`i an ,,,-•,r LOCKWOOD ENGINEERING & SURVEYING COMP/AN7,INC , 1♦ _.... . ; 8300 FOOTWILL BOULCVARD 7CgMONOA,CALIFORNIA714) 1%70— September 11 . 1981 Mr. Lloyd Hubbs Comc:anity Development Department Engineering Division P.O. Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga. Calif. 91730 RE: Parcel Map No. 5733 Dear Lloyd: Enclosed herewith is check in the amount of $62.00 in payment for one year extension on Parcel Map No . 5733• The original application was made for the purpose of comnicting a contract sale of the house and lot on Etiwanda Avenue which had been entered into five years ago. l.'. Additior.al time is needed in order to clarify terms and conditions required for final approval. Thank you. Mary » McNay Y cc. Fred Th.ompsor. Lockwood Engineering i ail ] MEMBER ONTARIO•UPLAND BOARD OF REALTORS 6 A.I.O.C. - h INDUSTRIAL—COMMERCIAI.—INVESTMENT —RESIDENTIAL (, GREATV:^NTARIO APEA -h � CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA UCAMa STAFF REPORTS° 'n DATE: October 14, 1981 0 $ l9 JI T0: Planning Commission 1977 IFROM: Lloyd 8. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall , Engineering Technician SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION REQUEST FOR PARCEL MAP N0. 5795 - GRANG°R ing two parce s ocated on t e south side o Wi son Avenue, east of Hermosa Avenue into four parcels - APN 201-181-47 and 48 Attached is a letter submitted by J. M. Wilson requesting a 6-month extension of time to record Parcel Map 5795. Tentative approval was granted by the City Engineer an March 25, 1980 for a period of 18 months. If a 6-month extension is granted, the parcel map will expire on March 25, 1982. RECON'1ENDATION It is' ; recommended that a 6-month extension of time be granted for Parcel Map 5795. Respectfully submitted, LBH: :jaa Attachment ITEM C wf.i GiV eI I... �y[�YOI..Ii�rGOWfV VI GY.{iw_.nLWUr YfPn{G .rf:.R..l{ Sn[[^1:'LYY.[tl A l( /•V.]NTIOM Or TYC Ni\r�'H.G�.y[:r YIl11 RlW1�.n1�. I M:tinl>T.: MOV r'..InI,T. IPTP PwC�YCO IOIIf i ems,/ en.._•..Gw.0...[..tea. yr.—......i.4+>rwi4[ ulu.Yv caurowmw nlss mw..nn.cRanowu 1 L1rci V3f.RPY9 n y. ' -. ' (/1<I.Vri.9<VI 1� tj� W �rti o e ee n EX.CITAO9 G"OVE !- w Al- 0' .WfL uC{� . (l• ].c4oeY�nCL: C.ETIgIl49 40GMFTY: LC9 � VI U YITOCV'KO a.r.�.>rLC. 3O,CpO Yr: + RCUVurWCNCl6 S P n •f9 I F.� sececn. oPPmAoe ems.-m R i I. M. WIL.EUNS CIVIL ENGINEER 3B7� NORTH SECOND AVENUE UPLAND,CR 9178E [74.4�9B5-2BB5 September 21 , 1951 a. C 'v of Rancho Cucamonga y, P. O. Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, CP, 9173o Re: P.M. 5795 Gentlemen., We would like to request an extension of time of B months to allow us to complete the processing of the Final Map. Please do not hesitate to call, should any questions arise. V Iry truly yours, l�� �rome M. Wilson, C.E. JMW/lw l 11 +S m.. t: i. . hL{ CITY OF RANCHO CUCA MONGA ��CAnao'►h STAFF REPORT O O a OCTOBER 14, 1981 F y 1977 1; TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PEk..IT NO. 81-16 - STUART - The interim use of an office/industrial bui ing for a church facility in the General Industrial Zone located at 9507 Arrow Route Suite H ABSTRACT: The applicant is requesting review and approval for an interim church facility to be located in the Cucamonga Business Park, as described above. This request is similar to the Gala Fellowship and Foursquare Gospel church applications previously approved by the Planning Commission. Staff has provided the appropriate Resolution of Approval with Conditions for your review and consideration. i- BACKGROUND: The applicant, Charles Stuart, representing Lighthouse Ministries Incorporated has requested approval to occupy a suite in the Cucamonga Business Park generally located on the southwest corner of Arrow and Arraibaid Avenues (Exhibit A). The applicants are proposing to utilize - nis site as an office and sanctuary for the Lighthouse Ministries hurch. Approximately 2 persons will work in the office starting if, June, 1982. Until then regular hours will not be kept on a daily basis. Church meetings may be held on any of the week nights after 6:00 p.m. with occasional weddings on Saturdays. Churcb services will be held on Sunday from 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon and 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Currently there are approximately 30 members in the congrr.- gation. Attached is a surv, ,, of the existing or potential tenants in the adjacent i .es. It is the applicants intention that this be an interim, fac'. iity for an unspecified length of time until the congregation is large enough to support a permanent facility. a ANALYS:.S: The site is designated in the Industrial Specific Plan and + the General Plan, as General Industrial . Church related uses are allowed subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission. Currently, the 11,026 sq. ft. building the church will occupy is vacant, but an office/warehouse medical equipment service company with hours `rom 8 to 5, Monday through Friday is considering leasing a portion of the building. The church will occupy a total of 4 900 sq. ft. with 2,4GO sq. ft. used for offices and classrooms and the remaining 2,500 sq. ft. used for a 125seat sanctuary. There are 22 parking spaces assigned to this �:; suite with an additional 73 spaces in the immediate vicinity available for weekend and night gatherings (Exhibit B). (II ITEM 0 'I' Staff Report CUP 81-16 -2- October 14, 7987 As thR Commission will recall from their review and approval of the Gala Fellowship and Foursgltare Gospel Church, the main issue relative to church uses in industrial zones Is parking availability. Exhibit C diagrams the location and number of parking spaces designated for each of the three churches. No overlaping 01' the designated spaces occur. Since the group meetings and activities will take place during times ether than normal business hours of the business park, ample parking is available. Staff has attached recommended conditions of approval , similar to those used on the two previous church applications. Should any complaints arise fr 'n the operation of this facility, staff recommends that this item should be brought back to the Planning Commission for review. CORRESCE: A public hearing notice was advertised in the Daily Report Newspaper on October 2, K31. 37 puth*ic hearing notices were sent to surrounding property owners within avO feet of the project site. To date, no correspondence has been received either, gar or agai-ist this project. RECOP:MENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the above-described request and consider all input and material relative to this project. A Resolution of Approval with ,. 1ditions is provided for your review and consideration. Respectfully bmitted, ` JA LAi , AICP, Director of Community Development JL:CJ•cd Attachments: Potential uses and hours of operation Exhibit A - Vicinity Map Exhibit 6 - Available Parking Exhibit C - Parking for ali churches !; Resolution c,:' Approval f Approval Conditions o -. I- Type o-' use and hours of operation cf ach adjacent occupant in Building 7 and Building 1 whose parking could be used by Lighthouse Ministries_ Suite A Vacant: These suites have purposely been B left unimproved. Reiter Development would C prefer to lease as one unit. P Suite E Office/Warehouse - under consideration with F a medical equipment service company whose hours are 8 :00 - 5: 00 Monday - Friday Suite G Lighthouse Ministries - Ii Business Office 9:00 - 5:00 Monday - Friday J Evening Meetinas after 6: OOpm K Sunday Mornings L r, S:- The parking available adjacent to Building 1 does not < conflict with any of the tenants in that building. All tenants in Building 1 fall within regular work week ` . business hours of 8 :00 - 5: 30 Monday - Friday. {4 W Li M, y�. •a rt �I Y f Marl 7I_ ' ..-..;, USL.0 O o 4. l— q` yl ~�N'•.c"f l" ^� l�,{i"'/,o ` � ...... .�-I•V� ��r = �� ♦ _ _. _ 'µPI.�.��J� i .'r � w 1 • -� '� dY-NI �4---III ,• ' t fY N G 1 .a • • 1 `'•"'-` aC.�"1 ql-yl +Y M -R-T i e G 0^ i v 0.10 W. .Y nrK .J. V ' y � o M-v© r r. V V NORTH CITY OF ITEM: RA\ 'HO CUCA VIONGA TITLE: V"L41- 1r ,BAR PLANNING DIVOON Exlt[I3lT- A sc%.t_r_:-N75 7 :n?r.V4-.O • • .•.M. Y` .... ♦ p ':J•f.d I -V R1r..-'.b R•rA:•il 4)C'WL G.MJ-H Q(' N.Y'M:i@ t'" - --1111tit:tl�_._J�tfitTiifr�lt[� -�__ - -•--- � _ SITE PLAFf - �J . . . 1: 1 '1•.11' •11 .I 1 CUCAMONGA BUSINESS PARK �— I PHASE TWO . :;••• w CYCwwOM011,<w1110•Mlil µ. LOCATION OF THE UNIT 10 BE USED BY LIGHTHOUSE MINISTRI S, INC. Cr!110CATION OP PARKING SPACES AVAILABLE FOR EVrZVING AND S.INOP Y M -tVINGS Mail of Yarl-ing 3pace.s i=ie3iate?-y available 95— NORTH CITY OF ITEX1: AN RANCHO C�.;CANY10i (pt� TITLE: A&L EL��a�r.�r�� PLANNING DIVISIOi�I EXHIBM 2 scitu. IJ'LS r r. i J I n1v- ACL zf ,b. Vol.• of, r �.r.•.. .. .luii: . ... .,. vli.,•.,. .il................ It�� I! t�• ii. „ .I rC . 7 CUCAMONGA BUSINESS PARK � :1. .. �K wuu n•ur • ,� bq.M• M.waw, I G VC•/•OMOw•<4lr/OMMr11 -- bi cl GALA FELLOWSHIP. . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . 92 ti- b FOURSQUARE GOSPEL CHURCH. . . . . .. . . 70 C LIGHTHOUSE MINISTRIES, INC. . . . . . . 95 257 TOTAL i <' TOTAL PROVIDED WITHIN BUSINESS PARK-523 NORTH ; CITY 0147 ITEM- D r=..ANCHO CUCATNIONYC'tA TITLE- fArXIN/i7 Fol?- Arc. c 4F mcd S PLANNING DIVISION 'r`XI iiI31T 1�_SCALE: s: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 81-16 FOR LIGHTHOUSE MINISTRIES LOCATED AT 9507 ARROW ROUTE IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL TONE. WHEREAS, on the 24th day of September, 1981, a complete application was filed by Charles R. Stuart fer review of the above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 14th day of October, 1981, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above-described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Ranchc Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, and the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed; and, 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vi- cinity. 3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the 7_onine Ordinance. SECTION 2: That Conditional Use Permit No. 81-16 is approved subject to the following conditions: 1 . This use shall be permitted at this location for two (2) years from the date of this approval . An extension by the Planning Commission could be ?' granted if extenuating circumstances are present. 2. The offices may be used for group meetings only after 6:00 p.m. on week rights and during the weekend as long as adequate parkin; is available. 3. No group meetings will be permitted which would exceed the available parking or cause adverse affects upon abutting businesses or properties. if such problems arise, then this item will be brought before the Commission for their consid- eration and possible termination of such use. i, i Resolution No. Page 2 4. All City Codes and Ordinances shall be complied with at all times. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Panning Commission 1 , JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of October, 1981, by the following vote- to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Ali. — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA cam"MaN STAFF REPORT a r o � o OCTOBER 14, 1981 1977 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development BY : Michael Vairin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 81-14 CUCAMONGA COUNTY WAIEP U - The eve opmeut off" an equipment yard within an extsflng 8,245 sq. ft. building on a 2.1 acre site for storage and repair of equipment and vehicles, assembly and welding, fuel storage, and an office - APN 208-152-19, 20, and 07 ABSTRACT: The Cucamonga County Water District has submitted a request for expansion of their present site into the old Cucamonga Post Office ® for storage and repair uses. These plans have been reviewed by both the Design and Development Review Committees with substantial recommendations for changes_ The applicant has chosen not to comply with the request of the Design Review Committees and requested review by the full Planning Commission. The Design Review Committee has made specific recommendations, which are attached, should the Commission consider approval of this project and recommends that the project not be approved if the applicant does riot consent to these conditions. The Commission's options are approval' with the recommended conditions by the Design Review Committee, or denial of the project if the applicant does not agree to such conditions. Please find attached a Resolution of Approval with recommended Conditions of Approval and a Resolution of Denial . BACKGROUND: The Water District, which is currently located on the southeast. corner of Klusman and San Bernardino Road, recently completed an office expansion project on that site. More recently, the District obtained the Cucamonga Post Office building located at Klusman and Estacia and is desiring to utilize that building and surrounding site for equip- ment storage and repair. The City Zoning Ordinance does not permit equipment storage and repair in the C-2 zone unless a Conditional Use Permit is approved by the Commission with findings that such use can be compatible with surrounding uses. The site is presently zoned C-2 as well as the surrounding properties. The surrounding properties are pre- sently developed as single family residential homes and are being used as such. The applicant is not proposing to construct any additional buildings. ITEM E Staff Report, CUP 81-14 -2- October 1.4, 1981 Auk ANALYSIS: Equipment storage yards and repair services typically have problems related tc aesthetics and hours of operation. The applicants are propcsino to screen the storage facility by use of a 6' chainlink fence with vines and a 4' landscaped area in front of the chainlink fence. The applicant's proposal is not consistent with past Planning Commission Policy and standards for landscaping and screening requirements. Klusman and Estacia are both local streets and reouire a minimum 20' setback to walls and fences from the curb with sidewalk and landscaping. Typically, the sidewalk is 6' wide width would provide 14' of landscaping. The Design Review Committee has reviewed the proposal and has recommended that the property be developed in accordance with the Commission's stand- ards for the full 14' of landscaping and use of solid screen wall to match the building_ The buildings are presently constructed with slump stone block which the screen wall could be built of. The applicant feels that the amount of landscaping the Commission is asking for is unappropriate. However, uses of this nature are even more so in need of this type of screening and landscaping. The Commission set landscape standards and setbacks several years ago and has implemented those standards consistently since that time_ The Committee felt that such standards should be uni- +ormly implemented. The applicant contends two agreements; 1 ) property is expensive and every square foot is needed, and 2) too much landscaped areas could create water shortages. The Committee agrees that land is expensive, however, development standards are uniformly imposed on all properties and are necessary for enhancement and protection of the Community. Further, the Committee felt it is not the area of landscaping that causes water problems, but rather the type of landscaping and irrigation that is provided. We have always encouraged drought resistant planting, a combination of hard- scape, and a drip irrigation system. This is a good opportunity for CCWD to set an example. In addition to the above concern, following are changes recommended if this project is approved. There are several existing mature trees throughout the site which are being recommended to be saved and in- corporated into the landscaped area. Some of the existing planting along Estacia Court has died and it is recunmended that this planting be replaced, in addition to some additional trees - o enhance this area. The east pro- perty line abuts single family residences and it is therefore recommended that dense landscaping consisting of fast qrowing shrubs be planted along this property line. It is also recommended that the storage of equipment and vehicles not project above the wall nor be visible from the street frontages. The operation of the facility should be done in a manner that will not adversely affect the surrounding residences and should be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 P.M. The Design Review Committee felt that this use could be compatible with the surrounding uses since most of the repair and major storage will be within the existing building. However, this feeling is based upon meeting the requirements as has been described above. To remain consistent with the past decisions made by the Commission, two options are available for your consideration; 1 ) approval of the attached Resolution with the 1 ®1 Staff Report, CUP 81-14 -3- October 14, 1981 Conditions as recommended by the Design Review Committee; or, 2) denial of the Conditional Use Permit based upon lack of compliance with standards if the applicant will not agree to such changes as recommended by the Design Review Committee. Part I of the Initial Study is attached for your review and consideration. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Check List and have found no significant adverse impacts upon the environment contingent upon imple- menting mitigation measures such as appropriate landscaping and screening. It is recommended that the Commnission issue a Negative Declaration based upon the Conditions of Approval as recommended by tht Design Review Committee. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing item in The Daily Report newspaper and public hearing notices were sent to surrounding property owners. To date, no correspondence has been received in regard to this project. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to receive all public input. Please find attached a Resolution of Approval with recommended Conditions of Approval and a Resolution of Denial for your final consideration. Respectfully submitted, JACK LAM, AICP, Director of Community Development JL:MV:cd Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Project Description Exhibit "B" - Location Map Exhibit "C" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "D" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "E" - Warehouse elevations Part I - Initial Study Resolution of Approval with Conditions Resolution of Denial nY The present request involves the following: The Cucamonga County Water District has r•ecertly purchased the Post Office Building located on the northeast corner• of Klusman and Estacia Court, and directly south of the present Water District Administration Building. The Water District intends to use the Post Office Building for the following functions: 1. Warehouse for the storage of meters, pumps and related items and storage of vehicle parts used for repairs. 2. Office space for directing work, Lunch Room. 3. Meter Repair. 4. Vehicle Repair. 5. Fabrication of items such as Fire Hydrant assemblies and related items requiring welding. The space between the Post Office and the Water District 'Building will be used for the following purposes: 1. Two (2) 10,000 gallon gas tanks and dispensers for private use by the Water District. 2. Truck parking for' District owned vehicles. 3. Pipe storage, for use in fabrication and operations. r I . 971 IN 1 1 I 1 ei]O 1 i.. , YeOC --------------- f.— AFFORD STREET ••r• _•�. �---+ u'� le••r 1 Vie•• — 1 W I I K I0a9 IfrA Lwae 'epN eon 1 ewe eeoe I Yoa4 I II SAH pf.RHARpINO _ 1 1 eu' o•. LNl•ccARi I ,l i eOr� 1 oea CtiTt I ia�1 1 W 1 z I W I < ! 9 I y W I I IMAOL.H' I I ,y 1 .,,..ya.. I I I � e•q 1 eR. I .aC 1 Cm✓.n[ j - ES7ACIA COUH7 1 1 I o••a rwnlYur�•orlwaT •I�e�erleoa. oo i ew• MAMA. r t R R, R R F I Ih 1 0. j R ~ < o I R .+ I h �� , I em• < I � m � � ew• Y�„ Z a` Irt ' rt . rt IR, 'RR ICA g 10M u oa• eo• ' esn•een.oa.•w. .... .w... --_ — '— FOOTHILL _ I _ �bOUIEVwRp • i r V �1 NORTH CITY OF ITEM: L;UP 6141 Alft .RANCI-10 CUCAMONGA TITLE: 1-0(oATIO N MAP PLANI\G DIVLSION E,IN -A SCALE-- •� SAN DEnNARDINO nOAD f� p— _ 1rly`Ik.` i if � I I I � I � I I I •f� v,,�� °� � .�f�'� ."llr� � CUSTOMER PANNING ;;�1 _s'_�il.._._•, '^E `.,, • i I � T,::• � � , , �' • ,. , �� �,; is �,. eMa.orce PnnKIND s PH'C eronarF I 0 GAS PLW WARE 0=8=fa LOAD ESTAOIA count NORTH CITE' OF ITEM: CUP St- f4 _ RANCHO CUC:A 'IONGA TITLE: GatTe ELAN PLANNING D:�'LSION EXHIBIT-�_ SCALES IND t nY•at:t•I I .Y IYw,OII.NRq I``-'�•�� f�� OAOXUXLI 6CFYNA6'OINO - I%t f70.V O if',i 1'// ��� a __or N�.f aa-.4•+++»r SAP __.. N S!_ __..i_ ' ' Ii•V-arob... �1•ii.'• L'^^ M,%V 1 tc:l.;_.1�1 ':'a.:M-'..::`i'""�3---�'-(,�`4'MILR//lw•!t�,.. (.I ..LIMJ'l�/�tIPM•.!r't.lry !V.. a W � rv/w tr �1�t71��1 I-....--_-`w`«.:r.;."ow..�..w.'•t i ` .(�,��.�r.. rl ' wnlro oLw• r�/ I . FI 'I" �11111���ff ♦n =u/3 zc a / ' Ip .�� •r :Sl � I ��I ` 2 -4�; all �'�r... G s ' i y�,u,�y,',I� � j� •b Ac. � J �I _J� I I •h Y /Z -�yY�'" \ p .tr .li�Dwn �d .`}�,r•�.._.,, �a�.s u...'r•+.1�7�r 'f �.7. i mob.. �tr R "tl . ww.•rae'w .J.w..TL....r.-L.Avuw.ae �.-M. r .�r'r'I.�r•Mt�',�"' �...— - 'lif ']1 �,..d PSIj!^ i \Vwf�I tA4. I \.I�II�IGf —.fI1pW. �✓f1ti e n °.° Nq 1. k�k�t!' him 4,4 Pq +ti ,I rr• , �s'' y, � MtM.IF AIM I br .I 1'�rr.i.�'Mi'• (L.91�otkr° - e Yr 'Y't��Fi NORTH CITY Of ITEM: Lta 14 �o RA\'CHO CUCANIONGA TITLE: !ELAN PLANNING DIVISION EX111I31T: G SCALE. *S i. N fYO�9Wxv ,�,� a.A�w.rr _ ...�r��� __ _ n In ___ ff xc•.y L t r inn "- fw..rrw..•• r 1 r I 4JMNM1 r1 rlrrM @Ii%IM ��f/f.hn.rt0 IfxG. snL�.f cf.c V1-Ylora ' n - r�i.ii�aw .�' I r•�vb.. u u c c.�liv.Iiv�irn!ml i.e�I{�ril•��ir, -` rrfl G/f�f G'LG VAr Lo T✓w i.e'•r i CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRiGT WAREHOUSE V �I NORTH CITY OF, 1Tr%1: M VP S l- 14 RANCHO CUCAT�'I®\'C,� TITLE: y PLANNING DIVISION EXI1131T=_SCALE: fi ' CITY. OF _UNC!IO CUCAMONGA I1UT IAL STUDY PA RT I - PROJECT INFORMATION SIP= - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $�$0.0.0- For all projects requiring environmental review, this form mmist be completed and submitted to the Developmert Review Committee through the department wh.�re the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part ii of tiie Iiii':.ial Study. T'c DevelifnK-at "GV"'.CW Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public r:eetina at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will. mace one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 11 An additional information report should be supplied by the appliL4n+- giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Cucamonga County Water District Site Development APPLICANT 'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Cucamonga County Water District 9641 San Bernardino Road. Rancho Cucamonga j7Tzr)- 987-2591 (P.O. Box 636 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THI-c PROJECT: George Blanchard, Assistant General Manager P.O. Box 638, Rancho Cucamonga, 1 - LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL. NO. ) 9641 San Bernardino Road-Legal Description AYFached. - LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM FOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS : '',,, ..._. ,...._....__�....r..........._.._ ..._._.._ _.--------__-.__ .___.._._...___ . ._...- ._-.zap,,..; LPG rftR JECT DESCRIPTION tvy ` DESCRIPTION Or PROJECT- See attached. ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND r. PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF Aily- xistin • buildings, 15 200 S F Total acreage = 2.1 ac��� DESCRIBE THE ENVIROMCINT,AL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLTJDING INFORhiDTION OAT TOPOGRAPHy, p;_,,;WS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC F,SFECTS, USE OF S1JRROL114i',ING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTOOP; OF a�i EXISTING STRUCTURES AN M THEIR USE ATTACH NECESSARY STREETS) - The ro'iect is located in a C-2 zone, both parcels have been developed. The water istrict a mini s ra ive o ices o e no�iave Office to the south. To the north side of San Bernardino Roa isya _Fire Dept, and residentia to t. e eas sou an wes . e use is primarily residentia e exfiSt^ty� to Estacia Court. Existing p anting wi be Y additiojial landscaping. (`reserved and �nhancea wi ------------ ------------- Is the project, part of a. larger project, one Of a series - of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? NO ;ti CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA n4�ln STAFF REPORT OII a DATE: October 14, 1981 TO: Memhers of the Planning Commission r1977 FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development BY: Dan Coleman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 81-07 TENTATIVE TRACT 11869 - ROBERTS GROUP - A change of zone from R-1-10,000 to R-3/P.D. for a total planned development of 136 condominium units on 9.75 acres of land, to be located on the northeast corner of Archibald and Highland - APN 201-252-23, 25, and 26. ABSTRACT: The applicant is requesting review and approval of a planned devel- opment and associated Tentative Tract Map, (Exhibit "C") . The project will consist of 136 condominium units on 4 iots to be located on the northeast corner of Archibald and Highland Avenues. The proposed project meets the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Requirements, and has passed the City's Growth Management and Design Review process. Therefore, the Planned Develop- ment, Tentative Tract Map, and issuance of a Negative Declaration should be considered by the Planning Commission. BACKGROUND: The applicant has requested review and apnrovai of a 136 unit project on 9.75 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Archibald and Highland Avenues (Exhibit "A."). The project- site consists of an existing chicken ranch, two single family residences, vacant fields, and mature trees. The site is currently zoned R-1-10,000 (Single Family Residential ), and is designated for Medium Density Residential (4-14 dwelling units per acre) on the City's General Plan. The proposed project density is approximately 14 units per acre and is therefore consistent with the Zeneral Plan. The Froject site is bounded on the north by Eucalyptus windrows and vacant land, on the south by Highland Avenue and the proposed Foothill Freeway Cor- ridor, on the east by single family residences (a proposed 67 townhouse unit project) and on the west by Archibald Avenue and single family residences as indicated on the Site Utilization Map (Exhibit "B"). The surrounding zoning is also shown on Exhibit "B" . There is an AT&SF railroad spur right-of-way along the north project boundary, which is no longer used for rail purposes. The applicant is considering purchase of this land to expand their project area. An appropriFite condit.,:n has been attached to require City Planner approval on any expansion upon the project before the Commission at this time. ITEM F I STAFF REPORT October j4, 10-8 Page 2 The project has been revi-wed and rated by the Design and Growth Management Review Committees in dccurdonce wiLn Lre Growth lanagement Ordinance. The project received a point rating in excess of the required threshold and is therefore eligible for Planning Commission review. In addition, the Concep- tual Grading Plan has been reviewed by the Grading Committee and has re- ceived conceptual approval . ANALYSIS: As noted above, the project will con< ist of 136 condominium units_ Dwelling unit type "S" _e two-story s o cked units on top of car- ports. Dwelling types "A", "C" , and "D" utilizi a combination of carports and uncovered parking. The attached elevations (Exhibits "H-1-2") indicate that the units have been designed as two story i:nd two and one-half story units, with one and two bedroom flnor plans ranting from 849 square feet to 1,250 square feet (Exhibits 1 . Each unit will have a private yard enclosed by a low profile plaster wall and private decks upstairs. The proposed construction materials inciuu-: cedar shingle roofing, masonite siding with wood trim and railing, exterior plaster, and brick or stone veneer. In addition to private open spaces, a oclandering water element and green belts have been provided. Recreation faci ities include two each of: Swiimning pools, spas, small open play areas, and tot lots. The main project entrance will be on Highland Av(.nue , with a secondary access point on Archibald Avenue as shown on the attached Detailed Site Plan, Exhibit "D ' . Both acCess points have b-.es designed with heavily land- scaped center medians. A private drive has been 'irovided around the peri- meter of the project site for interior circulatioi. A total of 35 quest parking spaces have been provided throughout the 3roject site to maximize availability to all units. A continuous pedestri m circulation system has been provided throughout the project linking the wits with common open space areas and visitor parking areas. The Conceptual Landscape Plan, Exhibit "E", and Exhibit "J", Highland street- scope, indicate an equestrian trail in the Nrcitibc1d rigb.t-of-way. Both the Equestrian Coinvittee and Staff concur that egcestrian trails should be limited to the equestrian/rural ,rea defined in the City's General Plan. Therefore, the community trail designation on Archibald Avenue would in- clude ohiy a pedestrian sidewalk and bicycle land :)n the pavement. I l QT 1981 the Grading Committee's recommendation the project site has been " rain into catch basins and storm drains that will connect with Irain in Archibald Avenue. The remaining surface water runoff lected into box culverts and carried under sidewalks to the n addition, flood protection devices will be required along the ct boundary lines. -pal Landscape Plan, Exhibit "E", provides for an abundance of throughout the project site. The Design Review Committee rec- "'' the applicant that special attention be given to the treatment °""""'" ;bald and Highland corner. The applicant has provided a low ''' , berms, and specimen size trees at this location as indicated ' 1 )it "J", in order to soften the visual impact of the proposed a this intersection. Both Archibald and Highland Avenues have �d with substantial landscaping such as raised contour berming, e trees, and meandering sidewalks. Because of the drainage and proposed 6' masonry wall along the north project boundary, scaping width between the parking stalls and the north project WO 1 be minimal . Therefore, it is recommended that the attached ;tic- be adopted requiring a minimum 10' landscape pianter as m north property line, as indicated on the attached Exhibit "L". he location of the interior- circulation road, the building set- bstantialiy greater than required which maximizes the affect nd landscaping on Archibald and Highland Avenues. Uncovered •es located near Archibald and Highland Avenues have been de- turf blocked treatment. The attached Exhibit "V indicates ^tation on-site, with the possibility of preserving selected eview Committee reviewed the building elevations and architec- s of the project and has recommended approval of the project-. Brings and elevations of these buildings will be available for )mment at the Planning Commission meeting. 'art I of the 'nitial Study as completed by the applicant. In Fart I of the Initial Study, an expanded Initial Study was pre- on file. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study significant adverse impacts on the environment as a result of Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. STAFF REPORT October 14, 1981 Page 4 CORRESPONDENCE: A notice of public hearing was placed in The Daily Report newspaper. In addition, approximately 27 public hearing notices were mailed to surrounding property owners. To date, Staff has received no public input regarding this project. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the proposed Planned Development and Tentative Map and conduct a public hearing to consider all nubiic comments. If, after such review, the Commission con- curs with tF.-_ attached findings and -roposed Conditions of Approval , a motion to adapt the attached Resolution of Approval of the Tentative Tract Map and Resolution of Approval for the 'Lone Change would be appropriate. Respectfully ubmitted, JAJ LAM, AICP, Director of Community Development t JL:DC:kp Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization. Map Exhibit "C" - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "D" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "E" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "F" - Grading Plan Exhibit "G" - Phasing Plan Exhibit "H-1-3" - Elevations Exhibit "I-1-2" - Floor Plans Exhibit "J" - Highland Streetscape Exhibit "K" - Existing Vegetation ;. Exhibit "L" - Proposed Landscape Revision Initial Study Part I Resolution of Approval Conditions of Approval s r , , 1 i; r' it fi S V ' NII/IW� �1 � r I■ �: �':G: �G �'�■U O a r� • � � ' 1.1 � . 1 uwa.r wry, � � I it _- -- R-1 12 T \R-1-8500-T 4-14u/aat Is Single Family 6i;1-8500-T i l :� vocmt Flefa 1 I ��� • r-- f/ r s i lam` MUti Family 1p r� I -- I �.. 1 1 I R-1-8500:T R-T-8500 T 3 414u/a I G� NORTH CITY OFITENL f2p SI � I _ RANCHO CUGNIN'lONk GA TITLE=NATQrAL m g1'f� rION4 PLANNING DI TSION EXHIBIT: 12 SCALE: { �_ - T .' ,;t...' ___. ___~,7...� �•r ������ ..•..� �� 'I. � � f� 11 'n I•��rN•�i11073_- f —� �i •� r --��11 •�:.. -71fyp1r���.Rt_—_.• i ,IL� ��.'�' ,�y.��'�h,'.��['...,•�•+.�,,,.�1� � \... e" 17 i I� � � .N•;: `,I .�' 1 !L�•-,_ —ti.:.r.Y,;,. 1�y 1—�I i,�—,..I I '� i!"}'. _J�_la I i a�-�T.i � ,I . and i �.,"-^T.. •r � _�� M u I V, r � N �. w...__-:-1 •.ice-_ '•��n �� � �. im•: �j._,, �ft_""_= f�_"-'. 1 L.- �I« 1 �r�} � l�'I r� i� � 1 ly ;1� � .�•�. "JI.�*... I•�� nn �.wo �/�� ~� I "!: .._-• -•�..vr.�Ra�.. '_� _1_• —'w7k— —G`—'z—. i,.—..•r,,,`7�'._./ /CjJ -a.✓u•1 I .� '��'.:.�C�'jr...l�� �.. .-s' j1 ,. 1 �^ _ � vvnntu-'^,nnwi��_ \ I.� NORTH CITY OI' ITE 1. RAANC 140 CUCA1'"O GA. TITu Tt*t I�/� fo°�► ' PLANNING DIVISION •-,-- EXI#n;IT: ---�_SCALE: ' .� t4.A�As» �m • aw ra rid 83 r� rml T, t -TTi1TPTF TFi'i f g `� mm tta ,r —� G; r — y r.. . a ;=•J, -- : ro • � L. � Ct] i6 r.�i _ age 1. �_�}._.--�`� �. �=mil ""—�-- �!� ��•� 2` CC V �1 NORTH CITY OF ITEM: _ Ma 1 _0 7 ® IEiA.\CI . CUCAMONGA TITLE. AN PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: SCALE. 1 '� 1 ' •'I I�'t 1 ' O lip 1 dtw '�r-�'�t1„�iWL {I-i}t 111 �M!• .:+ 1 i t inns 'NOybin i,�llk' r On Ap, all lu'+q 1 o Y ... to, r � ; 1 . , - Y rt Vr {: 1 14 T j I'M LEqND molt fli CITY OF ITEM: P2 !S 1 RAINCHO CUCAN/lO.,\-,GA ITLF-1111: PLANNING DIVISION EK11113M. SCINLE: r 1 1 � . 1 ` f , 4 �� • ��d. XI� e� s:. , f. _r Ti1� (IS toA • ' i ;• • • �I � .J r` .. �`iIIC' , ;1 7F )x. ' ..,cif _ abfp.� i ul c �',7IiI11�II,� _AR, X V• ui� ;� "�¢+ _ s � - �t1 -u MUG 9 r�L11 ,n l � 1 NORTH CITY OF ITB I: f7 5 t-07 _ RANCHO CUCATNIO\CA 'I-ITI-1-:0 IT'S `A Gf©' PLANNING DIVISIGN EXHIBIT - ___SCALE._ �r , wx III I i elf FF 29 .'•_- - -_.-_.ter"-'.-_�� ,-,.��-... _ - _ _. • �i'31�'� l I v '. ...Iyyy! I1L[QI,7]II7�77y - 4 NORTH CITY C)I.1 ITL•\1: RANCHO CUG"'IOI 'GA TITLE: l"r PLANNING DIVIo-IC?\ EXI{B;IT 4•7 _ SCALE: 4 ,4s�•. �Qf .mow^.-,�. �,',:r:r1'r�.,' [ .f ,��.•.•'� ,v :�D� ::n' 5,4.x zi�i RI-" 1r NORTH CITY 01-7 ITENIt RANCHO CUCAMONGA T!TLE: PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT.T.H"�2 SCALE- -� e _ - --_ AawL .7Z •yq7 � � _��'. r (�--=•- �+ire D 1 'I}�r 1 q..N^ k ill. � � _ - ( __ l ♦ 1l �w MOVE�T NORTH CITY OF ITEM: Piz Sf't 7 _ PLMNINiNG DIVISION E,XI 1113IT: SCALE:- �-�- '1 J� 33 u �j NORTH CITY OF ITEM; RANCHO CUCY NIONCA, TITL!? t , PLANNING DIVISION EXI MUT= SCALE: Pill G.. � .,.. lYr r � afYyti, C7' o I7� � • ��rAr ." Y"a' b� —. ..-.-- •. •YI.IP.TI•.'1rD7/>'fhYlYs....� ••• l - �1`�':u.�?-1^��J7U 31TGSI!1\4�G�8S7U:�44,1 r, .c i G I St.u4v v 1~.�'T✓ ; ALMnt Wnll / .- _ _ — _ _. ) Eaue- .oft I � - Trultrcw"ro ` o 0 men Trees o ..9 • -�' � ys7 ? ^�7DJ MnPntlorirg Walk V V NORTH CITY Or, ITEM: - - Ti ANCI-10 CUCAMONGA TITLE,: (IG PLANNING DIVISION G\.lfillIT: _.�__ SCALE: �" '4—��c\` ` I �•':rv.:VT�IV:}i:iY':.�i:'}:'i..':.;:�� �V(''••'.�''VY:-•J� LV .._-_—:w. . . — -._.r�i\ :.niii� y?' ><5i°:.`i:::}}ii:':iii:•.'?{<•ii:{:"?^:•: =.. �.I ( ( �; ,�� i:ff:^"�.}:.; :S�<� '+r,�..5�::(•::ii iif: �if:: IFS—>. ..� �( � I �� � � � �_ '>�.;Y .;. •:::1st \. , .:.::.::....:......::..:..::.:..: :::::::::.::: ::.:: LT-�l� •m .n = NORTH LEGEND scale 1 inch = 128 feet Q BLUE GUM EUCALYPTUS WITH JUNIPER D DEODAR PASTURE S SWEET GUM TAMARISK WINDROW O MIMOSA M MAGNOLIA X SHAMEL ASH F PINE TREES L LEMON BOTTLEBRUSH F FIG TREE IN. WALNUT 0 JAPANESE BLACK, PINE NORTH �L:I'£�' OF ITEM: RAN CI C�T��� i�'ION�sr1 TITLE- F:A�1'6v`�61�t 1/�,e rTo ;.: PLANNING DIV;SION i \( iI(31T: SG1LE _� 1 f , � ; I FORTH CITY OF ITr_XI: _ RANCHO CUGN iN'I0\'GA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISIUN Er:I tli?IT---__SCALE: ••••• CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I — PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET — To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $80-00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this Development form must be completed and submitted to the Review Coiurittee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Fart II of the Initial Studv. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard- The c:uncnittee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional info=nation- report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: ROLLINGBROOK APPLICANT 'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: The Roberts Group Inc 17748 Skypark Boulevard - Suite 160 7. vir,, rA naRi4 (2iaa 754 6242 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Toni Quezada The Roberts Group, Inc. 17748 Skypark Boulevard Suite 160 Irvine CA (714) 754-6242 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO - ) Northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Hinhiand Avrmie _ Assessor's Parcel No. 's 201-252-23. 201-252-25. 201-252-26__ LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: "done Expected PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The proposed project involves the develop- ment of 136 condominium units on 9.75 acres of partially developed land. The condominium development will be comprised of 34 one-bedroom units, 80 two-bedroom units, and 22 two-bedroom plus den units. ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS , IF ANY: The project site consists of 9.75 acres Additional information on the existing and proposed buildings on the oronerty is discussed in Attachment "A". DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORi•I9TION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCEDTIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTI_`:G STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS) : The environmental setting of the project site is described in Attachment "A". JI Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? The proposed project is not part of a larger project or one of a series of cumulative actions which may have significant environmental impacts . Aft r WILL THIS PROJECT - YES NO �}g X 1. Create a substantial change in. ground contours? _ X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibraticr.? X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.) X G_ Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5- Remove any existing trees? How many? X 6 . Create the need for use or dispos,l of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, £lammables or explosi.vi -s? Explanation of any YES answers above : "Yes" answers are discussed in Attachment r IMPORTANT: if the project involves the construction of residential units, comple:.e the form on the next page. CERTIPICATICN: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Development Review Committee. ` :. Date April 30, 1981 signature ); Title 's'bc4ate Director Ultrasystems, Inc. , 2400 Michelson Drive Z 3 Irvine, CA 92715 RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CO14MISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 11869 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 11869, hereinafter "Map" submitted by The Roberts Group, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a subdivision for a total planned development of 136 condominium units on 9.75 acres in the R-1-10,000 zone (R-3JP.D, pending), located on the northeast corner of Archibald and Highland Avenue, APN 201-252-23, 25, and 26 into 4 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on October 14, 1981; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and c;:sidered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considc. ;d other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamong? does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 11869 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. _ RESIDMITIAL CONSTP.UCTION The followinq information should be provided to the City of Rancho-Cmamonga Planning Division in order to aid in assessinc the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential developmeit. Tract No. 11869 Vane of Developer and Tentative Tract No. : The Roberts Grnup Specific Location of ,Project: Northeast corner Archibald and Highland Avenues PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PRASE 4 MOTAL Nu,-nber of single fa:aily units: N/A N=ber of multiple family units: 32 29 37 38 136 _ -M Date proposed to begir. ccns tru ction: 4/1/82 7/1/82 ' 10/1/82 1/1/83 }: Earliest date of 1 occul:anc;I: 10/1/82 2/1/83 4/1/83 7/1/83 t cdel t.. and u of Tentative Pig" Bedrocns Price ?lance S; n A - 1 Bdrm 78,990 _ 8 6 12 8 34 B - 2 Bdrm 86 ,990 12 _ 12 10 8 42 C - 2 Bdrm 87,990 6 7 9 16 38 D - 2 Bdrm/Den 89,990 6 4 6 6 22 Resolution No. Page 2 (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 11869, a copy of which is attached hereto,is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. A minimum of ten (10) feet landscaped planter, as measured from north property line, shall be provided between un- covered parking areas and the north project boundary. 2. If the Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe right-of-way to the north is acquired, revised plans shall be submitted to the City Planner for review and approval . 3. That vine pockets with irrigation be provided at carport posts as indicated on elevations. 4. That a directory sign shall be provided at each project entry subject to City Planner review and approval . ENGINEERING DIVISION 5. All interior private streets shall have a crown section. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I , JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and is regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of October, 1931, by the following vote- to-wit: AYES: IOMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: z f' N Y N a ti .•.Y Na` _ N Y'" N V q 'n y .•n Wq vVr r ✓ f. N d VC ? O mn..0 C .•V. ui.i O b C r P q N G U J- C V y.n.r y q C Gw- mp C A•q Gy V, «.. J u r� ••r yr � � •nLn « �� �u u. �L r'aar �! L J A V � � O V V u _ L'T f � n V �V N u • n•n.+C Fu A `a` ,^ i « w In L C 'J ru 'N.a V. V V •• 1 L_ V C V• L•V'•' u L -•-. N ••V. � ��� V � l'L V v0• LL r y EI .•V. y V u >J Va a A« N V '�V V u 6Q q u V •� u i q A V G G K i u f' O• _- 'Y. n y u• a]..L. N T r' n. .^ L.� tJ l O v ti - ..: c r L�..C- F nr N� i• � N C � W�w'N L u• V N T l L. \J N U C N L•� N A li.y C Y rNi C N o �.0 urn G u -• � u grj N L ANC L yy ^4 aN W N O � ,U JL G .J N (L� n• _ U OJTn ; AY Lr� VC l �u N.x/ >r r.. T fCNN Nu C IL 41 rG «ti =S u n V Nn PO u ,^!_l NF LGV' N 0/+ lTV O70•J4N Na •O- vNN •(aV n^. A M' _ AwaLN C • � Jl V•- •] C J L q u >✓ J.-• d C J� `J C N C�n.^•u C V O. V� u l: C N _ V N 'Y u' L V V NV«rNir o LLu lna V.n i. n V �u VNN nuY � ti ..<a ual nL'' NG: V V 6 ~L �. V k. qu u L•n L N qn O 'u •Tr p r�L.- 4 W V C u (.u N N .n u w T n C V�y+l H ` > u I' r C W A N•On N d Y q r' F u y 4� r•r t �aa V' C N � L ur� CJ n• n � F N tJ •n � u V LL L (U fJ N r] L t),O '.J N .^ .L. = c .Nir u � I, q u t a' o i 6 a W .c am it o w u.• °a I`L u� u. L. •C CV ^ �M + U.I� 6 NW OL ? V l•n N M` A^ L V•L+I:J F. 00 AC Er ^ C 60 NrV-. V[L•a q Vc 9 N1„l V� Yr u_ x Y (yy O L pur u nV "p^p.`,((:://u G N �N 4 .[-` L ` W V N y .� :J •7•^ � r^rtl N.•. C F P N N� ry y na �C' 6 N L V y�«4 V••C. M1 �a 4a �� : �� ' E' � - >,5 � N��yw � ✓ ✓ « uC VY. Ou q0 LL CV rN f0 • ^'J�r L: C ur P O•n _ L .un - L. .. 3 .•c bpi a+ Wig' oc.L• `o %� `ra.W. o oo« <,a` ���5 n,I1I rt G 6'•V• uN �N LC N kL CO• ca[ �� NY � y'n6WC. NJr �j,�� y V40 VI � .i Ly A A J V Nu y V� Vna +a0 ANmV•urJ u,Cn 'j� V �� W V� Oo TN u Ll n Vy H i 'R V VbN NL CC: Her yAa-Y Vr Vrr. Nh C ` T 4A � u � A C IJ V - J q T l u U V L P� r W�l L u u N .^ J L L �~ Q N Y U •-. L N V r^ O NN rA � G 7 _ lOj :aA N� L NV � r0 NN LrLL y0 r NGWUO l 4� .•r-- wGr NC KN NV VI •Oir Cf V) HZ �V VILG V .nJ i NNL' rN. • V - J[ T W.� L •y. J u wr N JN.a L H W N F« �O G C .� N q C � l m d .. r. u P Orr N Z V l Y •V O N �•W.� � V A W r W G a~J u V d y C 0 ^1 l L V orrri- L L � N W Y L9 6 C- i V 6 y'- W' tW. O N ..C. l na • m V L �•� u L N N•�aN ^ q � V L, W W .N.•y r.� n- NJ p L^ jY yNV W[a �N L.NAr 'Y ^V L L ^ N ly L rrLLi S AA Ct uC N a•, 6Y rl'J•^ �rY �� yn� � N 4..C. LVi 4,T �� � M••C. .WCr VC^ P4 �r<: N ;W A •�� W Nu L� qr uC wO. N .V-. Lr.V.r NW } Vr^ AY. O V N_ J �L C V > .•.tJ J• .0 l W l W rr..� N N �O 4� N 7J u } F �- I J YV CO RN u N uL fJL ni WL� ^ V Y « P{L �N wa A ` «` y. ap C A T• {I u � J u V u i n 'Va �% o c... u L. nr.N „W � yor r`e unc .`..w � •"' � � rr: 40 �.. cW� o L`ci F q Y s x Ny u v m L c off- o N « nN.y ar sir Y, '� W wo ... '•N o•^G J°j � Lyc ooL i Wo � ` L p uA O \M�•i n_ O ` yV V � N OC G' Olr n.•N. NbN .'�JO AW LLq r+.•\-YL N ` l V V - \S.J V K C O n b 'O �^ „ •o U •.. N U. N` � .•u N N 4 c: T � C �y rn yr M O T O a] Cq l= N^ VN • LL ^ YT L4rL. y`a YV NVO A Y .� � N - C /-1 M u L' m min u u W O• V u u N 0 •^.. u C f`P 60U VI •Cj - I � O L .• N L'u p q� l AW L N� � C � � C C � N N N G r 6 � } (R] dNN �. N Lu•� Wt VAM «�� �u „N � LLN .4 C qO N N W l wC C W YL N LVL W NPN Y4 q�N U- O ^ _� 1: P^ J4LL. N Jy Ll CU V pW � V � AT -LY v� C N•U. NCrO Wq � naL VCC ^ x •nCV u0•nN Op NVaV V 4� .1� •u� u\� ^ l L V� M1 S: V l t N � � N b l' t C l f T 4 V!: V /r A � 4 q y q � (�� N J u N Y q 7 N N T n.U •n O�. V. • V � ^- •� N 4 O Ir O C N �y O � NAY q^ •V Y L Y G ^ �. (` l P� Q Y r u N '� `' - cam au o .L. .•.iY N� L� � ,n t' N !'� 4 V � �/I �� TO^ VNN V ` „VN �L LPN .. • q � lI U. _ u.^ N^ > >N L pTa ' L N .• • v I y; �� ^ C NNL K u Y t W L n D N O ^�•AY N � q P N V >u•'I r r •r •l V N.. O: t�0'. � i 6•r 4wrCia LLw� r� KWJ KONrLrr L' rOrr Hrl N N O •� �V W w Y N - U �.r,�• `jN�J• `x.•1'f V `�ofJlr �Jr(0�(]. e. `JO(JJ� P .O.r •• r �rj '. N rrC •..1 H !la J d 4 l •� ' n CN � r- ul Y� V J _ uq J W nv W :" al c -` w .d^ °r T d ._. PN i'b o ._ � _ N✓_'u� q vn'J J U O Lq' L N u V .^u • N - _ z ma c. n p n � o _ c n v 'n a ✓ �;. X n��� � �• o✓ .J W c a c_ yLL w Nr._ ony vw :;.p. �. i pl ._ oc o v ✓c •`a nL Y= p W N^•L ✓ Nn N A r ,N dW ^ O d � V> . aVNi P^,_ L c..p" ,.. � .L."� � .'..'Ld.. i W JJ JJ ✓i "u.: c g, .oi i a`J � ^`-;�_ n n.+ a n • WNN VN L VP L q WfIL }= J Y. 4G_C � k. O' l I` M C A W ti Cl L C u_ W X Y 'X^• ur C W , n n u u� � O_ V l'M •V- L '- ^ R.¢ -. L 4T N ^ y � N ✓ i J N_ L W P f- q✓ O n J n N ^ 9 l L' '� =. ] Y f n ✓ _L �- ^ C � L 'U S'V T . 4 V4_ r Y N p. C .o r rye •« prn ^ .O N •- ^u ^ � ._ n V N o n N n ✓ u C '✓ �O G Cr_L Tr O y n✓ 1_ W N t -�y,U. L Cn to C_ � 6 C O O _ �.= ^N� l A C N .O_' "IYr `U� :' n N 5 6 a o' LW _ Nm Lam. ., n� ` c c aN > �. S.� •' L•�v do✓ u W ric '� N L^J -y � <. N _ - cv P �.' JT w o✓ _ u:y cc= ✓ >, r> '�li_oU N N ` M L= Tv u r J�� L R C ^ LJ� V�lJ J ^' V � d P ✓ C L'q.-. O v C n O W C nl U T C 7J.- ✓ V W O }u d q L V W CW L u-=jP 4 G.! Wp .J .N 1 ^LL✓ �w'li � "� 1J Ld qr� NN6 "'✓ •'� '�Napr '�¢-d N _C Ou_ lV u` NOO 4 _ '� d ^ C W y O `C u ✓ � 6 N u Y n L ^ p� G N T ry n C:.U L` V V }O V V9 ry Nv uCV V � aNr4p = SJL LAC IT L .�W NVti yT V u . iJ0r0.� W O. q O 4 ✓.Vrr LN` S CCOn Nr Nim> � LV q LON N= iatU TV uni G6 = N � uY LVV �iV W-1� Y�.� VOi _.O u .rV. 'V PV Gw� Vq � b4 Y✓ ' q� � .. Np o.�✓ o nNm�'o L_ W o. u i� t','o.J `" y...o �'. � L U N y L` y C._u _ N L,u•_ C ^q V 0 r T� V =i�y �.ar = .�V S wry V ^-t1 ,C CS.� qC fj V_. � G LL u� q _J 3O PC lL A Fi V 4d qq ru J L r^ 4.0_` q p✓p •.O A V V.L lJ y r N y Y {". _C � � U. ✓ L� CrVV O. = N WVw✓_6 WUL �✓ _ NPV V^ _L Uu N4V LT '1 8 f: V b r_ u C T �+ O .p N W V L L .- �.u .- C�U •4 d r✓ N W _~no n iJ<i�✓ -• mi L p d Q,t ^ 7 N ON Nu0 Cu Gu L 1J L 7 u V d �L w.� VO y Y V ✓\ �l '4 u C t• .'f'.^g 0 0 ?C�i V y1 N `u N O _ c v' c. 'u J Y N_o ^' v u a� d a ._ o a m N i '^ N d 9 >.✓:r'> .a+ c c rA.�w A ap. .- N d.Nu y 9 P b. W yYNO .^ p u.rL. LUO r'b-rLUN O NN NV �4� ONd Vu � N L �✓ L y C Ol: .Vu bG LL LYL6C py�� Pu yL 09r'�-�tln u NOS qv ` '1 ^Z✓ 4L_. MR V • 'Jy !\O._ VOW ' N /l � V V L F•N LI>>l Y 4> � - N W N P L L `�i,�+ N 3 NNE �u ""��•« G <,_ = � � � d ✓b-Y_ N' q � Y'ti'1 T. S � pl N: '� NUN NJI TrO. r�C VW uU� P qu O 11P.v0_ [TJW � iIJVNuuP U�N ••-u d/,f � VUN ~ � CUfRJ CCVn PN u✓V I_r^ uYgn OLD nW AOtT9 uy j`C ^ u O Scanti .�•_ .J ^ L _ c nc NL �� _ i.q.`. %'' ^ � 1. C C dd .L�y L P_ Pl .._�.'w. w c•.q y N Y- ^ VV_ N y L\Vd n f T VV� Nd^N Z.4 ` VL"'Xw iy. I:L 7) Ln L'M 1LNT r "y n WtA ¢v_A N.r.. N .v NL� wyL q °. c OW.'. Nq� T i IS oW a a u .'- :..p. R ^cq._ vT ... � F � .o. rJ � '.: -`J c.� r�.r. t:. M • • .�0 ,^, ^Ly WbuC1^L'w0 N9VN 6rLn 0. 4V 4P6N� ly OL <i3Od FC Jill IA Li L u t� P uC •ni d V'Tq v+ U^d�^.0 = u• ^ � [L LNo c ✓un o � N o I�. i c. •C V L L• C 4 �. = � u T G ^.� L U la .N.` ✓ O _ W L L e• � 9 � I [a c ✓ J 4 a L W �lr. _ V L _ L: V`1 ` n LG CIO L V rY G n v G f. s ✓ > n L N ^' a'Jv : C V N Z `� w r✓rr cCc � r• O• � vG v G`G 'AOVc' $: i m ✓• VWu. '.^ p t y �! ✓i_ V 4 _r N i r L W ti- 4 an 4 M1 u U V L •nl n U V V ✓ L Om � V` al[ l ✓ O n ✓�� 'LCGl d 4 l+r.it., V _ ' /L^_ir •r� " N L u •- " N P N N N ^VJ a•r V 4 N O i. ^'1 1: r � A C i " d d 3 N L �. r`o c� �� ww r Nam` fi`` ui oP ,u.�.• �n No " s o%J- v' I i m c 'd �LIu �r � Ly 1 � w _•7 Lp •0u ' Lt•n L- N _ LN _ uuu Gr .J V � i N V V ` R V4 a 6 .n'JC uN lCY UyN lr A • u VU- ya4 rdy Y y >YU C' ^ 1` Ilr ar 4 V L• N ry•n N C V V L L l m L.� I:•^ ~ W u n A [ n O y _ a L ^ N -•� V V n u a N L L ••^ yU. f V aLn L' N P✓J W f 1 arm p O ^ Or L O c• C R ^ J' nJ L ^ r�. ii L am [ 4 C d fly O m J _ N a O �._ J L ^M V C O V L V r c d u V C M 5 > Y� •C-/ 1� ^I .� O'r N yS q J q Y / 1 1 u N 9 m N \t A V L ZI � O V(.'l aN.� A` N rJ .^ d U d R y u •- N ^ 4 V W fJr l N /• � V' L A N O L (J N C O q T �✓ p•wJ y fJ✓ :. �y Y N O•�%J f R> 4 Y L u.r L tJ V u w/� d � •u. r E Cr u L O d Y ALn TV V•- (+C^ q •� NPw� q F. N ^ C u ei fi_u ✓? C b•„_ ^ NFL NVN Lew un TVL P4G pV U.ff l O L O ddN H N^ o a E L c•�� ... LJN ✓r. Vim .. � � 'r L N NNPdr^- o _ c c o .N. N. _lip c V�u ✓. o p� o.- V - p -uia / y �yq c'nr _^ qL: ti n o s, iJ tl� J - - � ei U ^ C > N 4 V 6 L f`J L 4 Y.N�� 1 lU O 4r N l V V � q T W b•^ L fy n lJ CJ� V c'an .f m L-V N �( N O V .p d v V ^ ✓r n G G f-Ji N Q N u: U u T rJ f.J v J� ✓ .., ai v . •-u x _ c� d N _ �� � ` V d V L •N. T V _ _ p O •mq w.V.• rnTu _ u V rr Y N L ••N' O c V \'N C: A U N N LL b u N L W. N i s L G �< L N p C d N J W ^ Ci C V^C A V V 0. � ✓ N G` -J •.C G^ = L N d' �/. U V y N T tl. T 4 'n N 4[L c u L y N Q V • ✓ o r .. _.- .. ... tt o i. `p O .•. •J o ^:a eJ � - •rn L N ✓l o N L•v a i� Ou_ ✓jq Nd - ;` � p RC r'! �•l �+ V[1L quV rJN ULVV ' L:= ^ L Syr 9V •• C [i V•y VL , C'r-n N ✓r L u W fW' d V �r• b < V U W LL A~ V{yam L'N yuy � ^ N P G L V a.W 4: a.n y.•C. a L`.F ✓ ` N L F L W LL: l�.^ � [i`P 7 dt 1•� L A u q V 4� d uG'r N L. V L^•u= 11 ti V_ Y V U y 4r N _ 4• q V Ldt r•J N U I�V N LL V O L T C 7 O f.0 m � LYLy u i-. w �L qA S 'J -. N wW.� {' LNL LN L4a r• C =V Lu L� a•.m •uYrCirVb✓�✓ ? lC d� rvd W J_NV .•L.VV C✓NG•l Cu`W P q ✓N V � yV blp ELVL..n L U C ^o i u N G q > y V L' :`V r✓ir i w N�V W N - a C u T d V . [N V U` p'O_ a Vc N 6 ^.� N Y J O N d -0 r•.� L�•C LL M N S V C L ^ T O Y• '-LJ Vp �4.9 OM Nti VO Sr `;i'��LL.� r� t^ L1 mO�rrLW ;" NV < VV - L,Va IIW 4r1AA J Ld. LI.Y PN Tv fq a^N iT1C ` Vrn`� OY wN L..- • w w i Ov � � RL Xv -• - c n ea NY di ap-Na cmol I:'a''« .c. .�- it o .^- a >d PJ✓roe- N ov o._ Nw rb. LL ✓:n r- LL� NP`w ✓ '^ y Wd Ao � 7 •••rO �u�✓ ^~C.f N L ^ SJC uryA RUL N 4C W T ] LL CV y0 aCr•V O N L L C lO V N C W V `r w u w u L C LS Y 1 6�V C C R 11j.2 U V YVi L LJ V q C N V N w � C f--•C V tJ.� L f)L u u W N y L O ayC A 9 C m u C O•MN✓r 1, V N u y r` a. J V V LJ d 6 n! �rpn O V y✓ � r a O � _ N N _N_ 6. M ` ` r- l Otu6..•..� 42�✓ C•J, ; EL ,S NN O 1•^ N CLL••- nCLaV6 ONNV L � V JL ! C m.� p ui NLL .� nrV^ rpn �•Y /•1 T� N < r �•] V U. L ml5 V\. LS.•- Nr/1 L < G C O U•-ti� 4 0_i. u N O O ,•�-� rCt _V _A�� ar U W 7 N 4✓ W U n l rV.- _- � � •J a" f u L �� VI_ V`y ymfJN OLVh O Ir S� V OUV U�f qr/ OC r Y v� � q =V _� N u« a u -! N V _ L•y C N T f'•O fJ V V d W ur Yi `l.•- a.. U L yN. ^ —: `n o N _ L N.•. V wI l va 'r VCL2 - �yw 3^ Y _^Yu O� i. T nrN .-.Y. ✓ M C.uw Zq .-- HJ LL'' ^ � V'^ m` N •I N 6� _ W A N Il N p N '^ La � d A Y Lv r.VL � U [' O'7 CC CC V .. r].N � vrJ � I: Cud < N ^WL' n _ NNN L� _� L V • LU V� G (:y r..y u0i 3•C l' N N6ty Nira.!u M. ur^N n�a l�u r .. � + L4 .. N ) Nl � rair ^ V CL M r rlrV�LL UV�N N �u n� C S s 0 O �✓ U N O S d _> O Y Y aVK- m� 1.: V N rJ d � L p� .LLi. G p N q C.T N O lr•u u.r p .� _ •' Qn .v � ��eqi +nLw ✓ Lcva «ccyl: � �� LZq rj Ln �� nS .p✓�9 N '� ,d„•JN`- LLNTJN Zi _ o✓ U wur f� cr ar a c. N c L w_ ✓aL. ° J .N.. m i rpir� brga L+ <1 E 'u 20 4 � �.•. _ �( :.✓r;\ „ C.� l:., L � L tl T Lam`^ 1LV^ a.L•.IJ ✓rV_-� /.` C NL� U •J L•-�4 Lr..lJ�r� L.�J pLa� u .ern uV[: �.t ... pr CCL •. V N✓ L O ... i rV. .� F V d i W I ;a.�^ L ••U.n 6 l O✓ V^d b W V w-` L ... i l S '• N C N V _r Gr TVd CNCC FW1-c .3i Cw-4 L„N'� i OrJ LNG G dl- ^ CrN VJI OC •�• f. O rC 3 Gil' « L IJ V L L-.r•••• U L V V A O I-•> 4 0 G V L� - V Y U f�V V Y V N G V 6 V u p- V W N W w0• G . •a-� 1 PI Y.aGJ NI� � � vI l� ^I W I I •I t ar u • C � ` r `^ m •L V n v L J V !�nr O o n� N ^ •rC- � �J i> V N L u_ r• �� ^� - „.� c•>, c � Y. N ._ �-, N ••✓ T _ .L. < niL ati 1C Ais "i -:° vis 'J " i u i0 • � _^ � <ia C ' `:' Nc c.. 'J a` _ ro vi: `Lo. `` ^ �u LUV Cn �Y I FW U'� ��Y' rn Tlu �'I�`- YI ✓ Ny O+u O V C' � 'r` qr (. W � `J] ' O' `: •] OL V C � ui .�� P qr N N yr 4 .�u U c � iJ t] L F ✓_y u + .` Vr W N i� N•tLLi t � ••• r'r � P i y w O �.Gi l C u V u w w.. � N rw u '.' V u N V IJ `yam U r • •.r•U- t]✓ O N C v 7 aj w r_ L V LL4 N �I V •- u U W IL. L I ✓ m u •J f NC _ Vu" _ IJI uI'Y ^ ^9O N Oq V4 (' U�� LV -^-.� .� �✓ •- L .� J'.j a N p V U Cr Y LLO W L Y 9 .0 I , L•J y �✓ .rr� N A_ N C Ym o V Lm � i.� i uV �d O N � L N✓ Au r V V' ri u d V l:.b U. N N r _ y�` rir V N • V U < '1i u P t?,.� _.O 2 4 O U• i - d N u U^ N 1J .V".uL n l �.G r G� W V u L i.N v L " b •?uKV 1-V � I-fir CClN V „ Nt: u '�� � N L pu J = Y G•� n .l .J < u r I-u y1 6NL l • ^ V � �. Y� r.V 1 � 1 C �,J W ul ✓ ^ OI�j IVI `X_y' P P ,INVj s Y. J 1 .J V i V L V -J .L ¢r y v C u y ✓ v �' a IV N ") L ter• o �-o � �✓ � ii ru c� n acw c oN. � Pa V L L « � LL O n `C L .� O L i ^u V. C N A C C.• al I' m Gm ✓ c,�� :•..� o n✓I` � 1 L Y_ c ANY d✓ N FW ..rU YO l' • L CN u.L L P C �NV d U 6 L_T 9 O L � u u C �L W+• G LI N A .n l V P O �'= Y u L L � W N O(rr� r O Fl y� W L (_ N N ♦ Y.•. u r- P N U ✓9 l L~ L •- L C V L N L u r�N V L 9 Yl lrw.l: O V Ur C N V U = .Lir P V C YI .>4 V al i r2q Oy Ou ` N Nu y^• L uN G x•U... '` L✓ N LC� dduV Nu O .niu L r c c um (J Y = •r W NG ✓ .,. Y � �'W iL `J wJ "[2 i wm c✓'a �i q vu Y��n N V L V u L O l N 9 u ✓L n .I • ^ O C y� 'a.O l•�«L N l �. a. Y (G l G u r l u Y N urn « `_ �✓ rn .. �\ u � c u �{n o; m u•L � >, r...`. O «o ry u ] fL. ✓ V ^ Cj:J U y F L 4 C C n L L q ` i✓ O V O W V rr VL F 4J A y N L A T �' L' $ O C p • r? V'b •' W N .1 N ? IIW w L /: nV C uI J. Y y yV... CrN Cn u✓L NO Py J4 �21 ✓ .N.v ": .''N' 'Y cr IN2 '` ✓ P= - 'IC'W...^.` .`avc a J L :'-`S ` �u !', N .- 9 :Wta J: N WUP ✓IJ `ael m .__.:.A �� TC...C. Gy V r �Z� [.✓ n YI C._ O•� l u NI > Cr L L ` V N✓✓ \ LC` �LI rn0 L.t �L _NN N SU. i\I I ` 1NN I:V 4`C VC..1.� 06 Cy Lam•„NC G O L C^ r.0� �. y- -J N O nl u • N >,b L 'n L L �, d' 4 V✓ N Y �� N I ✓ P O F u« Vl U' I T m V V L u C t\ � •y^.r '^ W L Y ^N u V V y G N N N . ✓ L� O ni ...^ rN AC •J I'. � � V_'� rVd 1"✓1lV Y C u. V....uiN pN�a .. c� 2fo "' ' �n � � «Iw. c' �' q� Nu r'•.N 'ir NLLY C L d •V 6 N 6 0" W L LOI IVA l.r u II Cr b .A y "J N V U•..•✓w •� u `�M N.•.N C 4 L U� Jn cs .Y 6 V p•r. W✓\.p M/(r A•, � 1 r I NI I I � O � Wn N (O P a n L7 n L C l y •c ; �. u � l fv�IJL �u IN � C•�M � C y VJ> ' [ [ G 44VV i L L N O 'O ,J U 'r r•r 1G] G O L L fV� G� IV .J�•� L > LU.� M. » V» _•y n_ V F•�•nU L .0 y obi _� rOrX w dNi L u u 1' N .� L �[ L ••r ' v o�� � n •O o � Ld a y u p." E Br « o... C LLN � IJ V IG O N '<^ u t C�rLL v »uV q"'•r ' Nr I) u V. Vq 4� � dV V LVW N LTV 4uT 4 IW U L V On ^JAG q ynl o• . •J L ^ L 4 w 9 V L tJ•.�i � � LL Y. o ^. n N O N r N Ji w. a ,1lO ON '� � ru. Uu� l Vry NUT fu VrVUV q1•T �, G Vr•�H �^ .J u n L 1 '� u n O •�• V _ N [1 o O o N•y n u f. ^J fi C a 1LJ� LLr TI V � N yIVN r . ' Ol' lib N � L n.11 ,c.. .. = o ti i � A[� a v•- e o., C L u 1 q 4ru .l L q b n c.�» d,. o-. c u N G n i N r..r .r _. o c � -�". .cr ..LL•«�' a, f� o4,o 1...« .I o _ ..;ri t• �`no ro Jv�Y i� c+ni ._. +J c.`. � cice "` A A o� ::: �^� � ._ nA •� ' m`v .".ti [.•:oiJ Sjr V V n 4 L N b�OAL OV..L. �: V 60 VO TL `V 0.» VG V. O•G L O._� u N •'1l• 'L C q V b I I I � V A u L C C 4 d `O» ^^ [: T.�� 1r O G tJ n I '� A LL 6 4 O. 4 J H d K.� •I L (, •�I:r J� • V ^I 1 1 I 1- 19L .a>'i RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 81-07 REQUESTING A CHANCE IN THE 7.ONING FROM R-1-10,000 TO P.-3/P.D. FOR 9.75 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHI- BALD AND HIGHLAND AVENUES. APN 201-252-23, 25 AND 26 WHEREAS, on the 30th day of April , 1981, an application was filed and accepted on the above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 1.4th day of October, 1981, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed zone in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; 2. The proposed zone change would not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and 3. That the proposed zone change is in conformance with the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this project will not create a significant adverse impact c.. the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on October 14, 1981. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 14th day of October, 1981, Planned Development No. 81-07. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Planned Development No. 81-07. 3. That a Certified Copy of ..his Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council . 4. All conditions of approval applicable to Tentative Tract No. 11869 shall apply to this Planned Development. i Resolution No. Page 2 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Teffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission 1, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of Oct:.her, 1981 by the following vote to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: a; tint; 1• . �I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA c�,cnMON STAFF REPORT �. O O � F Z October 14, 1931 J 9 > 1977 I TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development BY: Arlene Troup, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMEN'; NO. 81-08 Tf 79G - H .F_FER W£S7LD VENTURE - A change of zone from R-1-10,000 t., R-3/PD for a total planned residential development of 67 condominium units on 5.85 acres of land located on the north side of Highland Avenue, east of Archibald Avenue - APN 201-252-32 ABSTRACT: The applicants have submitted development plans and a tentative tract map for the above-described project in order to gain consideration for approval by the Planning Co mmission. The approval of this project will necessitate the approval of four (4) integral parts of the project; a Negative Declaration for the environmental assessment, the rezoning of the site from R-1-10,000 (single family residential/10,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size zone) to R-3/PD (multiple family residential/Planned Development zone) , the site plan, building design, & tentative tract map. The projec- has been reviewed by both the Design and Growth Management Review Committees and,a= vresented, has success- fully passed the Residential Assessment System. A detailed Staff Report with related Resolutions and Conditions of Approval has been prepared for your review and considerationi. BACKGROUND: The applicants, Shaffer & Sons and Wesiland Venture Company, have requested approval of their proposal in order to develop 67 condominium units on 5.85 acres of land, located on the north side of Highland Avenue, approximately 800 feet east of Archibald Avenue (Exhibit 3). The site is currenity developed with 2 single family homes and contains an abandoned water storage tank. These are to be removed . (Exhibit "C"). A natural grade separation o 10-20 feet runs in an approximate north to south direction through the property, and the site has a slope of about 20 feet from the north to the south. Vege- taticn consists of turf and several large trees. Surrounding land uses are varied. The Alta Loma Channel runs along the eastern property line. A 45 foot wide easement, owned by the Atchison/Topeka and Santa Fe Rail- road, separates this property from other properties to the north. The easement is not used by the railroad. A chicken ranch is presently ITEM G Staff Report PD 81-08 (TT 11928) -2- October 14, 1981 located on the property north of the railroad right-of-way. There are two single family residences located on the south side of Highland Ave. Foothill Communities 0ruch of the Nazarene owns the large parcel im- mediately east of this project and has built their church on a portion of it. Tentative Tract No. Ti869 (Item "F" on this Agenda) , is located on the property adjacent to the west. The General Plan for this site is for medium density (4-14 dwelling units per acre) residential develop- ment. The density proposed for the project is approximately 12 units per acre. ANALYSIS: The project has been developed in accordance with the State Subdion Map Act, as well as, the City's Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, and General Plar. Setbacks, building separation, height, parking, and open space requirements have been coa,piled with (Exhibit "C"). Attached two-story townhouses of 4 or 5 units per building have been pro- posed. The units have either 2 or 3 bedrooms and range from 1 ,290 to 1 ,600 sq. ft. in size. Each unit has an attached two-car garage. Eighteen guest parking spaces have been provided throughout the site. Texturized pedes- trian crosswalks and curvilinear walkways have been provided in order to form a cortinuous pedestrian system. Recreation facilities include a pool, spa, deck area, recreation room, open recreation area, and tot lot. They are located towards the center of the project. Access to the development is provided via Highland Avenue. The required right-of-way width for Highland is 66 feet. Full street improvements will be provided along Highland, -including but not limited to curb and gutter, A.C. pavement and overlay, meandering sidewalks, drive approach, street lights and landscaped parkways. The interior road system is a single-loop private drive, which meets the minimum design standards of the Zoning Ordinance, and will be maintained by the Homeowners Association. A second access point for emergency purposes will be required as a condition of approval to be constructed to Fire District standards. The Preliminary Grading Plan has been reviewed by the Grading Committee and has been given conceptual approval , conditional to provisions being made for acceptin the water flowing onto the property from the north and west (Exhibit "V . The property will drain south and east into the Alta Loma Channel . The applicants will improve the Channel to ultimate carrying capacity. This improvement is necessary in order to meet the point threshold of the Residential Assessment System. Th? grading of the site will eliminate most of the natural grade separation and necessitate the removal of the existing trees. ,1 q' GJ�M0Nrg. Si 011 U >77 19�1 October 10., e Ylannin9 'omml o�unity pevetoPment tjA f C Me�c�bers °f Alcp> p.,rector ° annex pPMENt Nof 8o�8 t0 ck tam> start P NNEp pEVtiP cha<'9e sident'a d FROM ,Arlene 'roLP> 0.ssSv.sSgh 5 P PNp I total p y 85 all Ilec es t of an tr,ENtAt NAFER �?0 {Or units °nAvenue> ea 6 Jtipt E�jIRO 92i 10>�p0 67 con a°ae f HA 32 and 5UB fr ve 0Pment Oilthe ndrtk) ZO�'25�' an a d d°ca ;ti ld Pvenue loPme'nt Porder taro al Arch bmltted deroject ;n the aPP .ral ave su cr.bed P isSjon• �41 ;nte tat. licants hbo'�e'des n;n9 Cojiiols four nv;ronme jamtily .the aPP far th by ttxe Flhe appro raton for they lsin91e lmult7P;S des'9n' AUStR the t a ��o a pp recess a the pee ate {roe, R Zonel Osi 113, e p�1a° the - t�or idera rojec� `a'ect; e9 o the mum to Zonel > sewed W a,has suc 4f s- of this P the P eo Ye2on ft• nnn loPmen een re e5ent tailed St been Parts °f nt, the Epp sq ne3. peve has b d�as Pr A de l has 5essjae lll0, . llPlan roject -ttees a 5 stem PPPrOva resI res'% t map- Ro,ew N 5essme naiti ors °f tore f2 nt y `% t Ma emen s' t ti alk dera West " d r to ve de tel at o rth n the Re ,d o�u s nsi ton• and order rti e s fod u lYr P ;th d elate8 eve�'� and co offer & sonsP°sal a en th old Avenue homes Repill ora ed qC,r your licants'vahof th aU> lstof Ars 9le famre oved Prep the aP ed aPPrO Bra acres °f feet ea with 2 are to be in an gACRG have u;is apPro (m rrel l SO a9 e ta^d th 20 r t tooth d Le9 Us e en to e ; 10' ertY es lom�ondoally,m;n�Pvenue, ite �s caters oration h e the so land l;ne <`f: 6l Nigy�l and the s doned w rode Sep n throu�o'W" to ur-ou�d, roPertl Pad, . E iExh;bi tams an ban natura` 9 direct{tom the trees• e easter a Santa h e ' Cf s.`p iEy.con ate Wort to ado t Zp fee al lar9 ulon9 th" el- an nog flop- , , the QSently hibit _ ,. ..;, ,m a of f and s annel run ptchi-" ' rti:`= ;s Pr rox slap tut h the vcl)t ranch Si te cO a�sthe a5ementmta oe�y f°oaLhe ApcV.en are v soot wi e this , the ra,lr A 45 Separa of used U: r road ent ;s n ItEh� ,M G.. •1• I� I Y Il i. i.•. r , i 1l i , .i, 'Lip.♦ .. 1 tier 1 r .' r i ♦r6 o{�-r r" , • q 1 , y,. J✓.I I I ili 1 � I � r I ��r I I\ I 1 I' � I ,4 ( 1 lk '11 1 I 1 r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT F Z October 14, 1981 V y 1977 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development BY: Arlene Troup, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 81-08 TT f19 - HAFFER/WES L ND VENTURE - A change of zone from R-1-10,000 to R-3/PD for a total planned residential development of 67 condominium units on 5.85 acres of land located on the north side of Highland Avenue, east of Archibald Avenue - APN 201-252-32 ABSTRACT: The applicants have submitted development plans and a tentative tract map for the above-described project in order to gain consideration for approval by the Planning Connnission. The approval of this project will necessitate the approval of four (4) integral parts of the project; a Negative Declaration for the environmental assessment, the rezoning of the site from R-1-10,000 (single family residential/10,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size zone) to R-3/PD (multiple family residential/Planned Development zone), the site plan. building design, & tentative tract map. The project has been reviewed by both the Design and Growth Management Review Committees and,as presented, has success- fully passed the Residential Assessment System. A detailed Staff Report with related Resolutions and Conditions of Approval has been is prepared for your review and consideration. BACKGROUND: The applicants, Shaffer & Sons and Westland Venture ompany, have requested approval of their proposal it ^; der to develop 67 condominium units on 5.P5 acres of land, located u. she north side of Highland Avenue, approximately 800 feet east of Archibald Avenue (Exhibit B). The site is currenity developed with 2 single family homes and contains an abandoned water storage tank. These are to be removed . (Exhibit "C"). A natural grade separation of 10-20 feet runs in an approximate north to south direction through the property, and the site has a slope of about 20 feet from the north to the south. Vege- tation consists of turf and several large trees. Surrounding land uses are varied. The Alta Loma Channel runs along the eastern property line. 1` A 45 foot wide easement, owned by the Atcsi son/Topeka and Santa Fe Rail- road, separates this property from other properties to the north. The easement is not used by the railroad. 1 chicken ranch :s presently ITEM G Staff Report PD 81-08 (TT 11928) -3- October 14, 1981 The Conceptual Landscpaing Plans indicate landscaping throughout the site (Exhibit "F"; A landscaped traffic circle with a fountain will serve as the focal point for the entrance of this project. A detailed landscaping and irrigation plan indicating all proposed planting material in accordance with the standards and policies set by the Planning Commission shall be submitted for approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The Design Revie,v Committee has reviewed this project and found it to be an appropriate sytle for the proposed site (Exhibits "G", "H", and "I"). Detailed colored renderings and site plans and a building materials sample board have been prepared and will be available for your review at the Planning Commission meeting. Part I of the Initial Study, completed by the appl°cant,has been attached for your review. The study discusses various environmental factors, relative to the project. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study and included it in the Tentative Tract file. No adverse impacts an the environment due to this project have been found. If the Commission concurs with this determination, recommendation of a Negative Declaration would be ASL appropriate. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in a local newspaper of general circulation as a public hearing item, and notices have been mailed to surrounding property owners within 300 feet. To date no correspondence either for or against this project has been received. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to consider all matters relative to this project. If the Commission concurs with the findings of the Staff, adoption of the attached Resglutions with Conditions of Approval would be appropriate. Resp4'1ctfull sulbmit ed, JACK LAM, AICP, Director of Community Development JL:AT:cd Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Tentative Tract Map, Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Map, Exhibit "C" - Natural Features Map, Exhibit "D" - Detailed Site Plan, Exhibit "E" - Con- ceptual Grading and Drainage plan, Exhibit "F" - Con- ceptual Landscaping Plan, Exhibits "G", "H", & "I" - Architertural Elevations, Initial Study Part I , and Resolutictl with Conditions of Approval i '2r li4w c �E .ECttt�(" � rF�ll y •CS ,J� 1.'.� a aid' ' 1 / •1 / / a + {•b ¢ { I � . ,1 i E4dc$ AMk f a+� 2 1�, IL G� NORTH CITY Or ITEM- ` RANCHO CL'&�1IU\G:1 TITLE PLA.:\NI`G DIVISION EXI HUT:�_ SG\1.1 '3 1'. T 112- 112- r R117.•T R112-T ' R112T112-T' N1/2 TIRfl2lY.wr eilo•T R110-T IPRo,IECT sljE.; ;, Rw+851 II ry ; 12 11189-T-- —^R705-T R185•T�R.186 T �" Ales-T R185•T it • enn xloxwxr w R785-T .n woro/Kr Jmm SITE UTILIZATION MAP j..t-tip 17VILLAISF a: «.x.x r is Gt T p CITY O RANCHO CI."C.11IO:`(J 3 rl rl.r an- 'y�?_�� PLANNING DI1'i510\ 'XI 1111IT1h _ SCA!_! �'SA e u�l;lzra� ,.an Pop 7op-Sm,phk Af4o ix NORTH CITY OF 'TrNI: RAiNCI-fOCUCi-klN'I(),N(;A PLANNING DIVISUN LXI 11BIT: 0 SCALE-.- • �rf J..^ PROJECT SUMMARY y a a • .j�j • 0 „ • , I 70NE, R•110•T LAND USE,HESIOEN7IAL•MCOIUM 0.14 OUTAC LOT AREA 254E26 S.F.. US ACRES • -" a j NUMOER OF UNITS •67 ' r—r-� • �� ! - "' O,I o ,..\ DENSITY, 61715.05 •11.45 DU/AC PARKING,TENANTS•2 CAR ATTACHED CAMAGES - GUESTS•18 UNCOVERED SPACES TRASH ENCLOSURES, 0 a a 0- a N af..�JllJJx' UNIT TYPES, A.1400 S.F.20D. E-120D S.F. 160. 0.1600 S.F.36D.• F-1310 SF.26D.• C'1400 S.F.20M'D•1400 S.F.2 DO i _ ° 5 JI • 0.1600 S.F.300. H-1400 SF. 361).� • 11'�( JI c._.� . � ° 4LL°W1a.VOm1 uP1ArU xG p •.na VICINITY MAP „o acw HIGHLAND SITE PLAN pF�. „�.,„ TRACT WSM I. (NORTH CITY OF ITEM: T-Ion,APc1 �o \•6(c�ti1�Pti�f�� �� �� PLANNING DIX ISION EXI III;IT: U SCALL: • . Ills-- -'�aMa!•F.^ •Y I .M M✓ r•�••v+—+n/�'wr..Ya+ 1 1 •I 1 9J � \ �, 1 ''f• � �� Y t _ .a , t .,`,I I of ��.. _ .,.•,.•s:c: r �.•„ Jc- �. tj I J1 if . y� J .1 y \ � \\ 1 I f7 I �1 �--�5 s mar.: • .. _ 1111 f i\OItTH CIFp•T 1 -�`\ 1 c ��' ��A� ITI.` i I ' /\ f% ' 1 r_• 0`f`.(\.`'l1 f�\�\ r' 1"0 iJ�j } RANCHO Ct..•C,,kN,10,N(JA J n PLA\\I\C DIVISION C I 7 S fill _ i �� ,-q��y1 i q j3�y^'4Scnj ✓�� 1jjj,� i�f TIP I I DETAIL AT tiIGHLA6VD AVENGE .. :'o `��. .,c K"' wr... ,...., 71.r•k^fir S fi •Y`I 1 rM ',�:.'• • '� �' ,�rr7 H:� -r ' o y,,,Ylw y+^'^Z+..—Y.t +w ry i .Wwn PLANT SELECTION LIST •lrr i = ,t wr.«., ,. rnees �9R�-- Anaimneovca • •••"•"' � rwwww rcwwYw ewreu xanawn ruwAnouw w - rw.n,rwn wiYn Wwwr"uuwn ucc unK `�••.•••••:• '^0 , '.1� ^t wuu.rrvr nr�vmu uwrY, rGwuJrMWrOA�' r ���((( ``T �J. ,/ roaneuw+oe ^ngruuxrWYn r2w n:nnn i. Irk, ,�ww /.4•� �• r �Aa^rIMI.I Y�A'IIM�N,MM:ny11rW1{ * W1 �• �y1'1 � 4. IXnY rOriMOr�i4�Mv �,"'"w.�•>Z nIK � Vivv,uMN Wvd Iry R,�..(1�IL HIGHLAND �� ti ,� � .d, r� .Yrd�wr Y�"rrotaYworuY .r `'�'7- /ir, i•ill• e n .r—u n 4 w o�;v wL. _ _ •� —s '� �.5.�L.L.D.W LANDSCAPE PLAN �� TRACT IMB NORTH CITY OF f' Aft , RAINC O C,`CAAI( NGA y P►.ANNIN ll1�'15fU�I E\11113IT:_ SCALE: . .' I t.t.YK 1 t f Y /1.Vtll ; Ff(t� rl{i S�j3—Jij{ �Iiut tY ,t�f4(.w� ,� � ,M`• N'I 1a �... tl3i. ��). a�. __. �� i_. jY?. Y�•=.•'R3 � �d•'"e' ���� i � aa�t••4TTt1`'"4 ? ',"'�,'r�`�" r � '6 { � �L�t�-b{{Y�"��j {�pwt�YCoj�ctS��r,'�"`�` „T , .rY. )w • '� ' ti.1 r�:. L _„c,% '4' .r:2�J. �'I .. ��,>"-:IF!•.LytSjq .1�II�� i... ili r J A w ,/ ,l t ....,,.. f1 a It % .r,y-�._ .i .I. .-- lm�4.,�•,:GJim- .�v � .�trn.-� • ��'�r.JkMrLliif� �.���r.� �'.: Ynr FRONT ELEVATION - FIVE UNIT BUILDING, P , .ZV vij (' fL, n'ww.•wi.w._.. .... .'.I ibY� ._v ... t r •_ ' t -r�-r'r- arc 1 '/�P�f k c7� �.I?�Fvf�•? f. ����im•-i�l�i-rrrr�RLAS CLEVATION - FIVE UNIT BUILDING FUlYAHLAND NORTH a, CITY� OOFITEM: 1 1r�.�.�r��F � c �c•�'�,�� F��� �� �� RANCHO HO CUC,AL\ION(ptk PLANNING DRISION EM III31'r: SCALE- 4' ti I �: arMMl Mg — • � + •.o,• ..is ( '�4f'�"•/Iii� '� ( r QS•ry•M+1(Fia M 4.�49a i�a.•Q�'�fM� t. � .L� Ta. :i ' . woo a+u END ELEVATIONS Avid. (� ) lV. i l I .• , p_ u' _r i t: t T llil lw w:r� 4nri T [ !?'.I UNIT «!l I �•••• UNIT 7 UNIT r'G' •^••� Mw• UNIT F. UNIT U' HIGH VANTIAL. GnOUND FLOOR PLAN :.V NORTH ii CITY OF lTr�I a , - 1��;o1r.,•.,� a,�� r I {� CUCANJONGA TITI.F. PLANNNG DIVISION EM 1111IT: r t C. �i�:�;'..-•T-3i �^T:13:,7 .�f'�i !tf --'.. r < . ,:q. gym. i.+'+. r f i y11r:� .fp,7ti g$ ii 1 /•T- y.....'i�f"' 67• i�(�LT��'Yo" Pl C �.._' r��lil CI 1���. t Srn�C{�fWl{ ,� ��i� r r• ' ?. ,��\\ far wr SOUTH ELEVATION - ^ • �r: '� lt. c ( .� EAST ELEfrATION '�'-'t'T• �- r-""' il— -- mn f /l w� •. � � y w wn y.q�i�i•` 1 }rrPM P�rIk.F FFGA'c. ,•, :•-,..p:k�-,• J I�P Ii�l iI f�I'I III.u��L ��`'` +�(rr•Tn y f a k�f'•'•C7 I .titi•� rr •.+.:�:, t �..,i�{.4t1,,'i�l...'Fca`' JY :7•n,. owl Mn /IfC:};•!' NONTN EL[VATIONµ�r'y�,J..._,C FLOOR PLAN uW nu. \11 IMr - ✓ RECREATION BUILDING WEUT ELEVATION .''•r'r' '�� " 'i1 V1LLAS1s"— No RTI- ar�r n�' ITEM: RANG 0 VL:Ct- N'10,NCYIl TITI.I: __I(� 1.C�T_L.II IVl T•�r/'1�' !'•A '�Grl,�t' PLANNING DIVISION EXI 11131T SC\I.E: CITY Or RANCHO k�JCAMONGA INITIAL• STUD}' PART I - PROJECT INFORMArION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $70.00 For all projects reauir-na environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receip,, of .this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1.) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed., 3) The project 1a.'.1.1 have an environmental impact and an Environmental 1Wrr4.c•t Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional infoz:r, _ion report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the pxk,posed project. ?ROJECT TITLE: _HHiehland Villas APPLICAL'T 'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: y�aff-r & Sons Inc. 91_7 La Grande Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 987-1456 - Westland Venture Company, 1152 N. Mountain Pv' e. , Suite 104 Upland, CA 91786 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING T1iIS PROJECT: Thomas J. Davis - Architect 06).3 Arrow Rte. . Suite M_ Rancho C„ra•-no noon, ('a 4,$]_L4 9 ^ VOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS ADM ASSESSOR PARCEL Nq).) _ I?igh1.nnA Avn A P �l 201 '52 32 - T LIST OTHER PER11TTS NECESSIIR: FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL. STATE AND FEVERAL AGED'=c AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS- City Puildint F'ermit PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: ,mot Sevhn rnnrlor„Y inium unitwith attached two ca.r garages with a Spanish/M•-diterranean flavor. ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EY,ISTING AND PROPOSED BUTLDIIdGS, IF ANY: Lot area _ 5:85 .acres 2 existine houses to be removed = 386n first floor areaof new = 43, 2 D 0 S. F, total floor area = 9 , 41L, DESCRIBE THE EtTVIROMMENTPAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFJRIATION ON TOPOC?,;1PHY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, A11f CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCEI?IC ASPECTS, USE OF SUP.ZOUNDING PROPERTIES. AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTT.SG STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS) : The 5 RS acre ait is Intatod _pnroeimatPty 800 feet east of Archibald A., c. , on the north side of Highland Ave currently there are two houses, garage and an abandoned storage tank located on t e pTi ropert The site has ;. slope of ajout I(), from north to south_ vegetation cons z s of several medium size trees a.nd several large .:ucalyptus. ibere are no: cultural or historical as ects to the site. Adjacent propertijs consist: of a church and chicken ranches. a Is the project, part of a lazger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, Which although indiv dua11} small, may as a Whole gave sicai-icant environmental impact? rro a - a%„ WTLI_T1i7S PROJrCT: Ash ii:r ss I_O X 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise- or vibration? Xs. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.). X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? Xc 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? 6 ±_ X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables cr explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: Several trees located on the east part of Che site will have to be rerr.oved due to earth fi1_1 ir. this area. IMPORTANT: If the project inv-;lves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page, CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present- the data and inforrontion requi.-ed for this initial evaluation to the best oZ my ability, and that the fact::, statements, and inform,t,*on pre--cnted are true and correct to the best of my Rnowlcdgc and ,-lief. I further understand that additional infor::iation may he required to be suba;itterl before an adcqu0te evauuation can be made by the De VOlnnr,Lg1t Review Committee. Date_ signature ' Title ffg it r yi. ..a a RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. .Name of Developer and Tentative Tract. No. : Shaffer & Scns Inc. ; TN- 11928 Specific Location of Project: >\T „rh G;�t of TT= hl - r7 n + _ Archibald Ave. — -- PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PITASF. 4 TOTAL 1. Number of single i family units: 0 2. Number of multiple family units: 67 3. Date proposed to begin construction: 1982 ' 4. Earliest date of occupancy: 1982 Model 4 a:,.' r of Tentative - Number of 3 Bd. = 18 S. Brdrorfs Price Rance " 2 Bd. = 40 =604/ No. i Bd. = .9 = ' % -A--2_ _95. 200 1.5 103. 000 6 C-2 95 . 200 3 i D-3 _ 103, 000 6 E-1 83, 900 _ 9 F-2 84, 900 g G-2 :92, 600 14 H-3 95, 200 6 �al RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIO"JALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 11928 WHEREAS, Tentativp Tract Map No. 11928, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Shaffer & Sones/Westland Vphture Co. , app'iicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a total planned development of 67 condominium units on 5.85 acres of land in the R-1-10 zone, located on the north side of Highland Avenue, east of Archibald Avenue - APTI 201-252-32 into 1 lot, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on October 14, 1981, 1981; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 11928 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable inter-hm and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development nropesed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and av:idcb'le injury to humans ano wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract i' not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The des :gn of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at larqe, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the oroposed subdivision. Resolution No. Page 2 (9) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a "Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Man No. 11928, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. A directory shall be provided near the entrance of the project to direct visitors to appropriate units. EPIGINEERING DIVISION 2. The existing Hermosa Water Company easem?nt- for pipelines and reservoir shall be vacated prior to recordai.;,)n n.' the Final Tract Map. 3. The applicant shall address the merger of the Railroad right-of-way on the north with the project area, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4. The applicant shall construct an adequate, concrete lined channel with inlet and outlet structures over the Alta Loma Overflow Channel , contiguous to the subject tract. It shall be constructed to ultimate design capacity per San Bernardino County Flood Control District's standards and specifications. The cost of constructing the channel shall be credited towards the storm drain fee for the project. The City's standards storm drain reimbursement agreement will be executed to cover the contributions which exceed the fee amount. 5. All interior private streets shall have crown sections. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF OCT0BE•R, 1981. PLANNING 0MMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Cku9rman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planniaq Commission ti,. Resolution No. Page 3 AML I , JACK, t_AM, Secretary of the_ Planning Commission Pf the City of Rancho . Cucamonga, do hereby certify tha.' the forego;ng Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City o° Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of October, 1981, by the following vote- to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: y� N d r ..u L 'b r «gyp L N L r • 1 V V V• NYi p. N _ �u(1 V JO vL'r Pr... �` = 6. q = « �^ •UY N UNW .b C Y.� J A I+C qL N fJ �•' ' C YJ yC^ d q t,iVN G N« bMI OY ONNN NO Y.f. v } ..• } N y •� C lr « CL u L LC' 'r dr • Y WO V T W . � V ru.N. 0 4_ al Li� Cep JV € fVi W n � .. N C N TU U O.'.. N t1 C 7 �... '.• JJ LW .r L [! dD� � u TO N ` AL •) L �'0O � �6 Nr .' r � � = q � � YF4 N D N DCN '^.. n by cT v.. 0 4u •ci y V C4 G4NW Y) w� r4 � '^ ..• b N ,r V« N ' LO N IJr N � «ru �' V � � r N ^ �N dL Nw f• it .fin .�� d 6 O.0 ~L1.✓V 1c qT .V.0 J_Li r- •F y yO Cy DO b� •.- .0. Y � O�O N JJ� LN �y L' q C.. «d('JJ 4h N�Clu Nq G' W C ..C. N V c L d L' . ` } W N wl b n Y V Y w• f!u t«n N^ C uv N^ LL L Y G' q b D i .r C •^ q rC 60 qV O� A b`^ ^ 6Sy 0. w YJF� Vi' L `i WFb Vul'« Oa LLq Y 43 dG L V �' JL Y cYP 6� W `•r6 V.� .� L^ N mac' to« co asN� Lpp _q cc .` E u� '• `i l d« « N N J d V'J CC « N C« Pu u'V .. � O nCq•.y d YO. ^N co uyv.'..C. y 2:Nzi CC w VY �['J NL u' � ui rcRC C } bLL y'O�rp « �... � W rLb '>•CY �V N c � y C. •y O 9 W L CG b �� b Nu ONV d TV CLI " q Vu � 4N .J y d..l� bVti..c. Od C u u4 N r C V� ��i r 3 V V b N w G U C C._b.•.« C W N C Tl LL lr _ b' N � l LI F b Cq, D V V W V •l N L L W O b 4• P� r b « J r " O. •L y L N � L N P_ r O rb r y �b NY CjV ... N V N W rLFL rN�•_ Q.� ✓'.6 QN IAO N QVOi W.•<- w�Y Fq (51V l�Oa/ yV/ L I� F Y I Y• u q LJ L � w N•2 Y �.,M�r I_ L V L u q } Q O n a 1 m �L ' �\ •.'l C O V V _ y 10 N^lloll r; \. � S ,o' L q c c N� u•� "c �P « e ell u V J• Au 4N G Q L9 «�'v L ^� C7••- NLCI r b u O yW 1• V`\� V uT C.•�- V Y �MN ll0 JC GC TA N , 4.l F .\ \ � O ..u. ^ •.Y-q b«> aL' VryP LC' � +Y d {_u{ t1 C.0 � 0� l (� VO } 6 Y>Q O...O <� } LL..G- Oa0i VO00000 O OY DPq �• « Vb .24. ^` NY� "' Nd T`L• nLNu. ^'(`�. .Gd. � 'Yd' 4� LL QO (� , Y. O A C 9 b l.- } q C .. 7 1 '= ^ ��" N A W C T � r v G d q >•O �.. O Y �\ U Z �N + W N q N Y ai L d 4 L V Y O'r 4• d �.C „0... N ^ t q as,,a« c cr �, Y N w Y d r L •� O L � 'J 1F u L, r�. ,dn M ( Pv t!� 1; q ..` _ .�o yY rn Lg' N L •ca o. n^ t' w •. � V b � « � N.� d L L q .w.� t' M 9 C L:u J V u u« q O N d V i. yam`: d L' C 6r`r yO !. VrR C y+ N1, nI F. N L Tr p ... WN 6 .N � V p� O a: ��r P ..-. C m Z.O V:Y O S G� N N N L a •"• V 4^ .w. b« (N' gyp` O b• O"1 y0 Yl yW M O w I� Y L P N L W N V q q •N'L L t,•q Y 4 L b 11�G., p L O L N L r u b ti l q S 6 N q ` W r •Y•• •_ C Nn « N O Cq L�C LO •1 u .. Y HT W Nti n � � H4" h > f.4- Cr 6.«u 4�4 QYJ RO u'iN CUOi H:.r- � - '• 'Ga � � =Z Lr�i w 1 i i \ F .. :1 ' 1 1�� � � l �' 1 1: I ,t 1' l �v 1.1 1 1 , L i i 1 • "II-1he atia'ched Conditions of Approval are to replace the Conditions in your October 14, 1981 Planning Cormnission Agenda packet for 77 If you have any questions, please contact Carol. Thank you. Carol Il � 1�1.' ' 7 _ JF' rl Y . ._ r 1 _ •J d V YJ • ,^ ✓✓ T ^ + 9 ✓W N N ^+ ^ O V O N Nv ^ N L .c '°✓ .aY ONNN V T C 4 L n 9✓p l !� 4 V N .L C •• V n V 4 .Ljl`.� C'L ✓ Y 2+ AO 9 lJ ^ LCV �� ✓ .JmOt0 9 L `Vq Gy{ N V V J a s L � y ?✓C 6 p�.� N L � •^ a O•..r ✓ ✓' O J!' `L.O^ Y VNa�.�~ >O. �v �`L 11J1V '� u�L ^ q L V N Y d 9. q >9 V q u ✓ L q '^ O` N O C O U N LL A N � Y •' �4 L w i 6 q«L � y q T 6 � d R c ^_C r P y W n✓ '�� ^ O N P C d T LL O 1' ^ O L V i 4 V _ � ^ C Y ✓ A ✓, C.- '1 N �, V T L •' V L O V L '1^ V c Y C N O !1 t v C C } L Y. L � Y C .n'u n � W N N q' - ✓om � ou u. c✓ u v q ^ _ gin W v .ca m�_ � � o F.'.. � « •`�� c a .:T n' =v q �° a1 `�^-• c L .Ji V N r O N n L^ y S N ••• •n y 9 L cr ` ✓ r_ N N C C .-L v ✓ 3 ll 4 W P6 L.^ N; t. LL y V p !s•V O i+0 Cc „ c .. ✓ - m. -v dL � °rLJ� Y. J` N N.L-r°i�� o WW A« !'L+u 9 n' � - a.n '•i.a N.�.•`..p. F 10 o a. 4 o v A ✓ '•y i21 f L ✓:.E_ 4't yd'�s 3 eo NVy •_a' ., :, � `M �� d V« •Ln 9 � L' � C U L w G n 9 r a �W •1I 4 d Tl L- Y✓sw. �-J f y�� L N� G Vy T•Ur O= �V Z y �,OLP u•r WL✓ V C Wr N�^� \ y ` c R p I •� C 6CJ u•NCO �n N f N L L ^ U^ f y Z V 19 O L✓ M i 9 > 3 ` C V y �l O L� L P b O N L N J y > A ~L 9 O•q N~ W W � 4 p LO d✓ `u u. ^ • N WL' Y � L.- „ �P CO „ i✓Q •- Y^rVV• O Yu YLu 0.c CO Cy J✓ •"✓ •rr. O . VO Sd �✓ ✓ PuuU � u LLV.0 NO V- ^VI tC J F L L M � q Y ✓C. V V. L c ... � N ^ � � T.^ ✓V •� V N Oi NN r� d Cd }� [ C C .l oC, uO•yYH ^� NN ��✓ „`4�uV •Nn tSt _ V 4V ✓9 O,„ d� Y ✓r F�4' „u ((4W(. P N� NU•L_' CVO N✓ n - ^ Ou ;^u V� V� .4•. 4 N C V C d <L N W C N V� N R N 1J q d ✓f �. y L^ C'^ L � J u 09VV N TO 9NgVMlS ✓q f. qu .n� GV9'`L, Oy R •r' 9 J m W 1C O y ✓ 1 1 . s V V q ^^V^✓ q+ C W` 'O .. N 9 O v 9 ` b 9 9I Y C✓f q ` A V �V 7 O y P i W 3 O Lyy W 6 ^✓ a W S� M N ✓u v N t•^ N L 1 ;J ^ V 9 RO•^ ^ ...•. dY O �✓ LV N +• �✓>.O Yd `,�'.` uh✓ 9 N✓•iV✓ L V a� •CV V6 N VO VI 4N WYL1 r % W4 J«Y 94L y..b ylZ✓ 1-. O�Y.. IL. LV4✓9 �W fI till 4 `I ^I ,FI4 � 1 �1 I C/� NI JI NI NI NI I \NI 6I it 1� � ` 0 �\J _ lH • `�J N yU ^ C nT C 9 i ✓. V+ p fJ �`\ \� `� JJ 9 C •Ni� VL_' .O Lq O ` , �^p� �.. 'n 4N �: � [J 6 V+ N L N✓`i � y qN GV bU V•- ." V l.f V. • O N ,p .p C N 9 C + yI A � N T T � YCY C•^ NV le �� �• • S O d q C C pY ` :V U 2 j = N O • W 4+ L..•p. VYy Vv O u^ N4C q�� C6 ua ,� 'v` � � � yJ N� g.Y p:J. •; v. L v � i o r. Y� o r. o � c i br W p ..�. .O U�•� L _� }�yu � ✓P J � ,� '♦ � wC Nc oG 9ou a.p..0. �O �C2t C� •Sig v.^ Oq i� MtJ ✓'N „N C „9 �9C •rV ^ .V. . 9V O Ld Vt M +6 1'� �.'l. } q U C 00 O✓ d4 ✓ PpL VV �• �' � ^ LL_ p Y6 L9 �✓ CVO �N L�f V� }� On � C✓ ✓ N S O • T -� LU •V• d ✓ L OC W�L „� N 9 •^^10 Cv. •N.. N^�LJ Y 40. 0 C43' OL NI OL dL- pLy ^R L O\�^ Ll • ` G O<i P~ N •^ 7 V✓q .Oi ..0 O' N l L ,C L .^ O JVi U L a q V N 4= � Y \\'• O � rb •mod qN V W SLd LL + } }• LL..L. � ✓V •Ln d••J� N• � \/1 � C � 9 YM N p� A h4N uqa .�•4O 400 40 r Vy � c 9 q ' � c N •� i� T T O.Lp� d p �O NN}l 49 N4 d1 � '�-Z 2V' C GL O_ ✓ pj L� \� MJ J O� ql ypol aN d✓a O U9� OM L� ITV Vp O..On^ V C CC f N L d C C M.✓J ' l V +✓+ p ✓ ..Vi Y O^+ C C o L h O0 W 4 Y CL C� V\\. N /C �9+ L m u O4 V C N O V•n _ V d 7 ��\ q � �N y.s L U9 d} uV9 LLC 1 N ?•� U 9O CVO ... � L p.V L✓' 22 q 9 OY L Lr S. V T. Nu� 4 OT 61 ^ O VV� O 'V «b NN L6 'Ca^ V �✓ V✓ C ♦ N b N 4 P ^ d.• _V•^ lr V .+ 4a N C 4 > y '' t O v O V Npp OYL i4O VM LOV �L¢Y� fa'`M pN 9� VGC w�+q L .n ✓ C Otl ON TIY N d pl LPN LW q' 9 GYV^ �tr•L «Rf l •� `+ +� � .bJ✓ i 'ti^- uWgti W i 9wu «L �-:1 2 z V) � .. ^ N� "' 9 per+ LtV •� M O C C L.• � N tti E q M 1^K H! <W •Z'••N LLM•• HL. 6Np GON f.✓ L .' N ..V- YPG d ♦�.1.. O� 1 x� "v M1'.v 1� N f n N J 4 Y I O y C✓1: .J V •. Eq EO � rn d 4 NV TO A y nw. FC'N ILr f_•� •Lir V C'�✓ L • t•] V� C-WN ✓ ' k V C K FL ��V G� 4 �VGu�.. y � •.Oj p � } C ✓ N W r� C � �.� U N A V L Y � � <•^ u C)O L •Vrr "l V•. .�. L Or + Y Y •J•• ✓ r~ir�� u I2�•+r u O O I1r,_, 4✓� i' IF- v N ✓w �`e q q w _'� N L c 4 N O lJ• •_ N V -r 4 L A` GOVV• QrO Lq ✓ L N�` JW �•W �-V qC ✓ VQ •r�y.aO TV _ C +l L' 4 •. n ^ q u -G- 4•^ t•.V dul u L•-= NVfa`� n rVir u A O� _L^ C N p A I L L ••r V 9 C /) L } �. f Z nri g L q O ' C O N N r ✓ L L Y V L L A O O 4 ^ V J � q N ^ �-�• N T N•^ _m^ ('• A C 4 N N l Y1 , ^ L � 4 C V• d C C U p V N S• V= r n Q^ F C L L L N L Q ` O ✓ L „W V •r •-L l-. yr`6 d �Q / i t .. uq O.A ^ C rQi fbr V. ••"Y Vn JV•r C_ Y VL+ NNNmy 4� O• 4 >d [�C �rN bN w � �N M} OC ^ O b ut y'L:sCOC Vy. bW ✓Y �r� CC � 6 d+ ✓ 4N NVr^r a it.° L�it o o^ u � � n « A 4 ` m N o W � •� t o N y .� =��q'�E a✓6 V N N )I N ✓N Q n� •Li r✓irTl•r Vn rch � N.Nt:r .=vr Lc. L� °� 8' u•� _YF tO.Ly W 10 L � �.�r•.=co✓.r c.^ me w^ u.^ ` y �' y +) Y. S✓ :•. o- L � oYP v✓o N C !L L. ^ ^' •yj "r'e L+_ N � N Fi n N L O O b V C u V ✓rVp O NU V •� L t•'�� N 4d. .•r q r•0.....^ L O M N LL} W f )1 N V fCi L' V V � L L cep �•V�w ar rnN ¢ wo Pc ✓.-. � k k `�i �.co.o.. min a � •p+ qi✓.i•` tNiiN U 1. ).r n+9 40 V` •.. .L W n •^:.� s L L l • N ^ N VLq �!dC 4` 4•^ N`N w ^ W^ _• C. CNu .�Z J >' Yn C qn^ yJ� M1I N QV u• .Q + qN V .fi b Z L ^� N `O N d q ✓ r L ^ FN � r+ nV^ /S CIn N C L' ^ O vl'1M pNY j aNN •ter � AVw.lJ�VQn N„ JC l� C 6 C `Or CN ^ qy, j bki•^ l �^ V) yA q •N �' W V L ` fY� C. LC.•N' N V Y f Y N C C C V q T C^ V O r00 C N 2✓ W > V O U V ^ O C UU N _O N CO4 w✓ N J A+ CI 4 C •' rt• N V V Q V rY y N V �)=iTJr ¢ r`�' VI✓ `,in n:vW )= 4 � flub $r' N4.'r`o r4x �e:.A ,N„ x F- a=d^.'.•� LUY•V k�NQp O W N c ✓o= � b o W L rn r .Y-•.Ye b ` m u CIL LQ •i•.V- Lr q INLf L6 YJ� L C V1= •d+ Jd C^VM 4^•. C� rr.n dVC ODnvr� VO r V LLNOti � � � c✓ L ✓ J q oc .-_ c brn r^qN � g c ��o c i c ✓ .•. Q.cc Lrl qa W.NL. Ny° c_✓ G.m.p. c�.Y, m � �L. uL:. � •'. 6� G �.•o 0 n L ai Y 6 L O v N q N N V U L L V y d O d b Y V WwCi C u0 uQr Q4 ygl � q N•Vn ��� �L M YVL d07+ i ••C• >7 Nn _V VV V Ndy CLJ yT �V _ti6 A �n J'V} Ln✓ N Z •Oy f01 pl{• ^NW uL �y N ^V• O^ 9 Vb Vr •� LlV LJN Cn A V L b G-N V N Y Q 9 4 •4 N r'J LL O q C p ^V O ~ fy+ V W ryA G It M ••L_�p ^ aA�Y VN >• gVnn �.�ULV `✓u u ••' bT L Y^ YOJ t:p •N..L. �' ;Y LLW Vr ^ u 3 fV L 1:�r Cruc N WO q D �y Utwd CO LNVO• p L~ V O� yA� 4.•C. �'�� Y•LNN Lug yL O CY m W �� LuuN N .�v�U A rr QN C T9VJ ^D�•U+ •'• WO rrrJi V N � L urTru ^V C ppY••L• ^ d0 Nn1 A 'C-. N{j I+VD•C"• N ^ q r[[++ qq t� Or � LaC LLV r0 T d2 9 V V ^L �CI]� L p�.-_.^ Nd ; O✓N LfV ^ N LL � 4L.r N6r CN W4 V 4 Y YN � rra• qLL^ q O + f/ QQ�yC pV N_ Y t.2 rr! J � � W A •r••• A j L m bu � n0 .Coc o.N L :e"O✓t ' A J c (�: prCOViyq ' ni A COI N l N uA '^NV<J C y�N^ CCN CNL • VLL 09 NC LTCIV VV N qA I� Q C ^ N .. yr u n q.^ C✓ n N 4 T •r A N V^ VT N O O ^ c V V V •O+ Q i) TJ 9L O V W Z; Sq.�� %Y •U WnI dUL r.. C4N q > 'qq }b�U•q.`•V C� C [�y ny J V L L q 9 fT q L N yI C d.•. A OIL rC 6V1 6• v p O V 2 L b i O.y. Q� N r^ V u^c V C • V u �•O L A NN � 40 Lv C16Y -1•-•W O W V + 6r(• q✓ Q�:r nQr N 9 W .•N L uL .L• �.O Lu L14 Dq r. Wd ^ qr NLY D y U n= uY d r6 WryLU 6 wlgL Pr y Ob L �Lbb V qOa] v 1. n• V LC Nul 4C O�.•••••O• L •� L'u^ jCC �Q O NL D✓ tug ^w� p c � yE urn qY W 'ov�Ng ynyi YiY2—n u^our" os V ^ W L L q Ny GI_ Y.M N BC NgQ� nC'Lu Y••. V VV •-. C_ ` C1) q� = LAL�J 6 6 Vp.••• O.O... Or^ •... Y Mq OrV R N_ Ny wDN✓^ �rpi• •� n ^. .Vi•i ^ N A P V V y O N O•n b lL Y O\V N C y i r C+W l 01 YV V•. C C` •o N V y ^ Q 6r M N N L qVq ^ V T ••• I4 Y Y O i4 Cc NL O•rOj � NL•NO OV' bL NN LLUAyp On ^L N w p, L > V tLir W b•V.. O 4 V ]•• d V^ 9 N p y[� C 9U f'U J G t C l._. •N y Q✓ L C L 4 Or 9 L •LIM DLL N W I rLn9 OLb N W bM J O C T^ 7 }t p�" Yy•mN rp N 'c SS ^2' ••�� C F,� k.^F yolL NL a•c y C O 6 § L } W N •N.fj O n L O V 01 3 N 4• C P N fl q b N U t' �' V 4 V C N 4 Pf 'r VV<V •�V� N JC ✓V Opt YI QCN ^ •.e rr,t Co V na L+ �'l p T •Cf.y t.f.' L u^ GrNL � ^ y/ bLL LLA > C✓ NUQ'n VDu yVgOI Q~� � AAq Ou L ��. ' K WF O1� •C 6 G Hs•Or R+N+ T r0 LOLL. ICY VyTr•� +V rV 'P F e,, UN � L QD Wy VO.VVO N WVN 4 O 4p �Qrn`p t••4.+ V(Ti 2C OL iy �� u v ir •' Tl \. .� 1. N T•N � �+ V� t p u C O•�y V ✓ `_ � d - V ` �' �L' a O✓ I O u L � C r - Y •" '••L n T.,u V V - I+ C1 d � L f^W.� C9 � y - ( O C '_ �•" O �I I I � ' NY ` =� Tor � W o .•• (_ s a c c•v p _ 0 1 I � N 4 �� 1 !" - T N s•(r' C „ V YI n V 4� � N O O � L 1.` rY r t r _ � I _ ✓t-OLL VrT . ^ y n• V l J O T F rn � (•y tr fw :• t� i � C V7 ; I L f r N k v_ � � � V L✓ 4� f•_.J ri R L <•1 O d •w I J _ V p �•V V V l [- •l ^'_ •rC. t•r L •V. N N O _ ✓ V✓ t� '� O C V _ I •• ma � N._ JV."_. 4 c_� q . 0 YG✓ ._ ua.. L _ W rn LN - .r ..- ] � J , �_ y N _ NW ✓ . J _.r .. _ _ � _ L r c � ` u."e v_ .. 9,� Y L-r✓ 4 -.`.m N _ ., ou c" o• _ _ -� 4 � V ^J� rl` it Y. y O •. N ✓ O N V � W f C'L V N •Nr• L�• 1.i (7 \. r� L __~ _ �.V -P V v y] V _ V C A V•Y. L N ••" O V L T+ u ,S G O � a qV _ V• V O n. 0 N ; OUVo _ V VNa� N (l.y \" ly q� A � LL _ t': N T � ✓ C r _� � • S Y � G �w O N O f: <W I • 4 O _ _ _ _ ✓ o ::'�. q N n y ui s' LN L✓ NN w u « ` W J ` n' _ _ _ 4 oVmCi Nd _CY Vu .rV• V �.LL�u .. •~n Nil ✓A N �' n v ys L .�. :� i:.�. A (.• N ..i G wr ii .Nr N�� o yr u..• c L .n.o. Pul $( i 'N" � N L � ^ ( •Jn tl-� Vrl uu f•r�0 N n"+� 4 +� Ir r•r PLO l�rL 'yV W 4 V �� � � N i - -• �'" � 'cnc N ^a v._ u.c•y"r A� mbr 4N "" " � 1 1` _ u S C V• q_ L C_ L �• 1• U N L y 0 A Or V L N i N Py�'W N F. •� � i 1 � l ` f T_ V G uu O•NL ^t.q 2uy J N N O .�'. C•C P N 4 O r••.- > L O V.V d r4 L C c F _r �+ •� _ C • 1 ! _ y O ._C.r, W _ CN ^ C ^ V •nOY 6VL lju Lur, rr Nr Q•OOLVVI V V .✓ :.• •• i � r"' _�_ , G 'C= N ` Ou CC LTrV N J �] y � VN 1 <• ALL UUL V .rn 4N i-O LrrJil 4 N a V V V r 00 (.y 1 l V y V `r¢ i O _O. n V q C� CT •' � L OV IN fir_ ev •': i o. n: J m Lr N •" V.J 6 � V ✓ O Y � �_ u N C O tr V _ NL � c Y- f. � C C - - t �V=y C q^ L L � O G C _N yr �V J .J` p Or � G L ._N G V•n _i"J N m C• L t G -• L�_ "J COS V 9C�N G.VO•C VL Y �'^ V •n > 3. V•��� N L u. N W _ � C C V V 4. _ V•{-{ � P'� C N I•v d •1�4 O_C 4 r_ V G� L ✓ • _ L 7 ✓ N� m_ vV_ y _90�I✓ 4� y` NV�V rV V p r LNu ULV VN >•+-� j$ VT` ' " < ✓ �� r1Cu =L LyLup � JnP CF Ou N ""• r� N ddir6 LW4Ny V1 C' w ` C _ •••t.r (�� S Ou uaL Vr 0••4• VO4w W u!Y aV0 G� N�V wy VW O L - t � •�Lu C✓b u lC i.0 64 V •]AV _ V C W Cu t,• n • _ V_ y` Y•` -� VCN NG d NO �`y -' -'- UN Cr• G y � '� L '_ rrr V= Lv'= 9 d _ d LL - •n V O• n.•. 'y L u O •" •. r tw y _ c -L.-..- L.w. L-- LG e: ce>r �o k`-e aLw �` W `^i= � `•- o4b G- N .`. i"r:id ✓ N_A i} � r � c �_•A LL IN •r � c' a e y > tl 6 V N V PU' Q _ V •• U N pr N ,.�� u J q. u O ,� C N _ r} CNVVr _ GN V-J OC If• •tL0! K. �rV to C •• • V Y" Vn 4 G CAM 1JL _!j Cr 4 NU [: N� �r✓ G._ LyuN r _q4 40 - 4 1r._ ._.O 'Ju � >O NVL - �� •NJ04 i„ L.VrV 6r PLL 1 L• l ` r0 O p9u.J VNC V•_ t,+-• A ✓� _ _ ._ flu OJ NV C'^ VL ��CUIJLV ry7LC v. Q T y Y PVTICi PUTJc a _ N _N ✓O � o.'t Gv.>•M'•UiL •i _ r E a War q W.„._ .__ ` .. _ c N Ir)u Cr4u Ouu-w 10FP uCN� ` -'`T) G•'• •+_N_ Vw- ..• Vti4 = � � � yV -wa t 4� ✓ V N C"JL�� C V b E L c� W k_ N C O v a�N Y.0• a N m V � r C C L • < �� )� C OOT qp !<V_•L u NC O ��. �"J •4 �� NC du G Ny N > L _ j t'Y- VC (✓ fy.� cL c✓ .W. o` ` Lu•N a c .v _ '-u :'. ^ L f(' -• - %o -_ ` f o a G✓ tr ` n' - b _ �' r o .y✓✓ o� 44u o$� '••; _ ,._ ( >L� L.u } r v u 4 i L:LI_ _ ': � L `e - ✓ _ N ALA ? �� G '� _9w�j'I. 0 NT�V pl V•0.1^ Ouue'L• VVJyI_ �u✓✓J _ _ ~V4 _ y •` t' C r u= 4 C u > lC N n A u O S-� ♦S a •--r Lr u T] Y ]r ' m N+_6 rCir T) N T C._ q 1 G (•w,r i LCLV L9`'• OV GCGc = 4A.yN F LN _'� Vu Lur ry "l lq N ^ 1. _ _ of ,r Q6Y DjN6' VN _ i.uu NI. CL N uL • •n._ d0 �•O••fV.I.. W VLdN � ` � � 4 r _ w, • L_Cr w• -J N `. K ._ y J m_ 4LL yf`� NLyLL OL V \ � _ PG V�TJN y4✓V1VC t_N •N ✓✓ �VLr Ou rL urC yyC VO•�L `� "V � C f ." N. S r4 'w V r'] L > �1. 3 4 V L O N •O.r!V]L p � O F .Vw 1' y yy V i . V - < ]\ LSi V Wr.. r N✓ N N .E (. .-.[._ (L 4L� f. _ _ _ ( -• ?' < L PY I-_ q�Y4.0 cu G_✓..o Ni Y^ N'"u6 JJ a n4o` Lo^�'yn •Nr^cwo L`�b'� p. � `• q_ •. >:.. _ {. L Y•l._ Y •" _ CVV 4 ul =.rr �` �•- 4•_ d OWCi w. _ • _ _ Vf` - .- ,7 b a W >v u c� c v v�•.fJ' r [: :. r. si� - � �: t:.c•. 7�., •� to d vim. ••� _. 1 � � ``f 0 •O 1 b r V �r 'j ✓ u q L ✓ T P� ^ r �0 r ✓ N ti C V O I i G n V +p 0 Y N .� " V W V 'n N ✓ V ^ / n.J b p P • N L R A 4 n I V W �:n, � _ T d A � _ u _ � I L C� Y L. •. V n u`V .r ril I , ; I f - U C ♦� '� - I. Y_ t � ^r V L [: r f :,n rJ� _ :♦ .V. � ' I C V y ` V 1:. N �". v o ::.W °_' T ��JJ G i ii r N ..� o Idl I ✓ •_'� '_y ✓.� _V h .rV_ � .Ln. L p` f. � L V✓ •. ` ._ �.. rV� � Y O ,__ L V •.„ V C C 6r O IJ u u V '� J L tr f I` u ^ t Y•`,r �J .. 1' 4 V✓ V ^ � L V A r. r..._ U N L n♦. ♦O H 1, V N rn � 'a _` 4 U A n r W L �w w ° N i. c�•. `p'i a m c v .r W - V v'N ° LSi j c� — ` n.+. J .r oP ._� _u .q d✓ � co q L� u N i.r_ is E o 1 y � �, c _� '^ L -c ' r f�� n e. o c $ '• ^ c �, Y v"1' G 3.� ^'� � .. L ..\. L a: V <i ^ q _L L _^ � V L LL N V N — J Q V G♦ u V -1 ` ` n f! N✓ V L �V '1L U' i �rr� u r- � O'J U t. + .^ - v i o N b L °' �^ o. C o `. "�' M �s-./11 L y G' Y p ♦ N N;� C i ve Nyow i <'. — on on ym (v) ' N'�no4 c �'1� � < • a LV �. � Vr^^e "' V^ 4r �:__ — = LM l: Lb ._ /� CAL •" . m � 1y rr N Cr f_ A W- D N, ^l N I"u `N L V N V fb� O u L f ♦ — " w'O �++ fI N •Ip— y L — ..G_ V Yr✓ •..u N d (�u N V 9 L .. V � � rn � Y L V r L y r` afyi•9• c! 'Z ♦^' i oL.`.t �i N m .N. r�LJ m�� N L � ._♦+ .� _ Gam' � � �: rl 9 a A N✓ d [d' LL N L � t4+1 O, y d f q � d ti b N V r < . ✓f ✓�� 4 V <' V Y Cl V 4 S u 6 Y ` V l C I U V'd J V� N „ u 4 f I•-. L' d i � `j'' '+ G •V .'. i j— — V J L l ♦Os ^ `r • ♦ j V ul•� Fu 1 LLNt� fnS <s ! M CUV U+ N I♦1 ' _ ul r A \ A P p Y J {CCr r CpT � L L J u L .0 u J I ` (✓r' Cbi ✓ T..- y LL � � O 1 4r^ L LG•Ci u « P Y p C u Au LA = r«ir �' e 4 e. ^�♦T o y ? N fJ %'r l ' 4 n C 4 L N.� u V G. ✓ N N b b Uc Cy Oi � �l n ✓ N O V � .fK .r O 4 ..� u Cr u`✓N a' N 4 y 1 yV. yr U W x I1 L d r+ C♦� _ L f H Z = A T L f.r« �'^ d NCJ Y. r^ •O J r a r W V� A N J C L b p. A C Cr U L L L 4 L 9 d 0 A L u r V1 � 1V 4 W M y L .�I 6 u L"i b .N C^ N '. O..^ C V C 4 T r U V �+y ✓ N L"� T _ u sf Y L — L �{I ' `e� D p .. bVZCO VV ✓ O YO Jr ryb 1u � fJ r ` � D— T L'yuV ✓VV V �•� O _ n P yLL 9Cu C L .. — f. W Vf OC 2V L TY t] P Ir u•. r1i✓ V L. N� UrVnOil Nu ut a- O ✓� 4L u � Q 7 U } C'^ � U♦� Ir .- Cp L u y ._ — bu t •�JJ U O C O T N L'u Y O V V G 4 V N CY N' L✓�.` ✓ LLB YU � yX ✓ f. n �L 'L• r.0 GU I i'. Y« rVn C G r L rV4 V P L q L d V r—'J^ y M O N t 4 ✓✓ y_ 7 f! L fr aU. C T G q 4 }%a(l,� Y. O � � A•^ f:^ i � L fl V I"• N V_ ✓u �. wOL J— ✓ � ylw. LQ^ `= r^ r L � 4 u > L u n;iOC C. O CL LG rnV NqL nd 7p. O O C b d O L— L U .V N L 4 C A N P b L U C^ r L �� 4✓ — C � L C u 'r W f/r O ✓u r.. 1r y 9 S b t. i L `f.� L W V r ^ L L t \♦�r V✓ tY u✓ Q '^ ur [: �O « PrJ [ � •. O nG6 I I c. n (LY cr✓rry N � .n t_ � U. _ .��` q O A r •i r V b C V r� ^ V P G'1-L rLC-= N r V `• ✓ t- f '/� jay ) .ib ^.r NOd +L Na♦ UU V L.-W NCO r- �:..r J ♦. is+„ d/ La L qL Cod Epr Cam. ,O^� VA Cr VurJ N� LT „4'� � I 0 V d a a _ V ff o d ujv «O N N O i� C « LLr tf by lUii q ¢•.n.L. G ^3z Y m uSs.� ui) aai Vu'Z p y OV— pvp VV O•^ O u� � � .Cu VYC�6 qL IN ..Y. cr O lr y NLC y Y^ NV Y ryry ;set, p ~ p L u L f_�rW d d vs . VS aw Nam(, IOy L. toj W iS c V 1 O" u � d fl O NCI uI V O� ry0 q 1"u Vu V' 2. SI T Y O L U V J M u O u T T W Z Y 1l c NU�4 VCT i) lT ! Jai« J }G qN [u0 nIVW GdY G L g L q uap NOS q L G�J V V C.LL� G 6uA CJ Opfuc.2 - L ,yi�VC �� Op u .^ O CG C C L1` DPW qd ^ V LI' Ogp9 Wr^u p O OL V~ q > G n« IJTY W N ^ C 6 � G u q ♦•j ^ U � q t GLLL (' N L VV O�nO u j� = Awd L y. V q 6 '4f .iL ?•!E 16 I O Vq✓ V �.� T �J q 1.A a. p � ,4 n r L 4•� O u U N V N.. � 41 V C' N u y L 7 ✓ m O y N T 4 V „ V `- V r�.� N m N 0. _✓y uo�c A! q 4 �L V C.y. N �� •11 V p j � u t ^ V L O _ L q N O •• V 'r N G L .0 O TN L �- � C r�V WE L r•,n nV F7 'c. V F i GpaiL� „ FLC NL ^h� « O q� V i L V L � n In^lr tJ/ I •u n N -� LC • q L _ O "{Z'q PVO• '.b �N� u � �� uqq �. p.J T N � N yr JVrNC Y V�i ✓���u 4JP r6 l: 6'4 ICViC dq Wrn N � � ` a { «v OtVO V •, c�y?W11i ANY ,Nn oa o •I✓ o q o mri„w:"' E Y.•nu ✓ `^Y uNC r`rZ L6 _ Y N1 («L tJ Iti TLJ t(t�' Tn [1 ... OHO^ LL JO yl 9� O ✓A� � Y N N L L p ^_ q F 4 P L Y V n Q1 N, GOI u L O L V U , L' y� 2 ��✓ VL LAC CN �^ t)t WO C.� Cy,.- ��Y N C4N T rNO N JJ q 'N C1 G V O.f ^.w I_ c F I c 6 � r O t' c W.r✓ i «v P « O� ty d V•� w C V^ ON 6JC roil �9 O' u ^ •n. Y O r �V . uc J uEti Yuw �n mc✓ � c w Nv_o uu n.e ry �r o � « o « a il:q m �J N(ic�v�J r c^ r`-no to. �" D > Y WLV :i�� L D ov: '^ i L'v o c«�' o✓ .`..Y ' ¢✓. M.`< u�i ��v c:N Wy ,vV —ci it J`. v � �� ' ��. a 1>•O X 66N 1- (J(y GuO. +L LLO rFu r [yq NV LLDS.V 1� •:O6 AML o W N nc c L c w ✓ T L P P ['�L rr V•J < q O 1J p W = q V O tw V N n.� _ (I✓ Y „ q Y N u � C� �•�•L`i 'J q C %r 1L N Y T« u L� 'Cl e v e V o i VO O mL _p_V uC q n •-V- ` o mVol•rV YL VV} cG N 4 L G O � V �T V r0- N n,-� O q l O L m V•� N V ^ V b V q ,> d u u ^ Y L^ ¢ N uO L ~N •J ` r• N ]� V n Y L N LL i� �/u n W >a w'L« T LO i L uc c. a) � oqN .o.•o c P it o -w c�o a•M.W ` o w. b o�r d s :,�y� c u.- u 4 WO L w. NC L.�•u ��? N•L ON L >T t' n Z ^ u: n 'u L L•' be •N. ^N ��.� = o a. : q c� voP� ^ 4n V� .` L«' .� ti• V N W N M L u b Y L 1 .. + L V� T C. E G V 10 r• .:N « rla c G N Y• rJO- Z q n1 C, U T N ()A �V•uV �y � Wrn^' Cu NON � aS qT Mq•r- PCIA VJ Nnu ql U.� uT ` C.�n '^ O UClu �p ^ OUW Nd •.L.q NVy L `G blA qV >V � u n �� Ym�! n✓ V _ rn > .. .�� 40... L.W. V � O V E q � O.O 4 P O r•C a'1 V 1 f 6} rP N W N O A G yr � V V.✓?�V G V�'� N•0 LV. 2 rL Z W N L •n y� A.n 4 N y (: q« q -y L:Vu G� �� «YNW �O •W � L� ` a In q� O.S: n- O"' -^Lt]' V `� PL L « C A ' L 4 u C L p W✓ O W r.0- N C O u 6 1. •li f C ; N C. V M N u(, N C W 'Z VN ' u 4 � �L N `'� : y N m F y: d. n N W L•N+ c>K� O O'� q �^ �T ✓ 9 L T N > C V N C C IJ�' ` 1 P N Y 7 L C Z•••AO „G> � A u w]ri' (u m 4 uAVI i C: C n -u« `t M N W ` w: r� r .� ^ T O •. C N n aW u LLA q�N. (1 A Yu q LO. rn :Li. Y j q^ tl V N V q WW u✓ JU 41 �`N Y� W� ^ '� V LCG LC V '0✓ q « •G > .Ni"`W LV'y i.O �'< u: ` T.NY«� n•E Nd `.J't.- .N T n s= P �< fi�•L � Y F: ur N o o E A d o W o«'� �+ i '�O Lq i.a - " O C41N L ••• � YVC { OIbC .-n TC'r� OY.. CP dN_ <In L PC NCVn ^ • ^I N Y .^ n. O- u LVr«.V ^ 'Yu�..L. YN ✓ UO �LC q /' ^ L.. L.� ` n n: j...L.0 V« L N `� C1 J V V ..N u F; N W L Iq O f r-^ ^^ ✓ > n y LL/] � q { V4�q d Y« rL y -r. q u^ l � b L 6( lJ 1 D LL 4 Q F. ••... Q N^ V a. r L O LL F:n ^✓ ` L -C 1 I N O ¢4 Wb Vm✓«O NgVy 'G P ¢O RPnN ur Y�•.- VV QL"OV �� C :.� (•1 •9 M tC 0 P V N ^� � In tD Ir (p r 1 I W - ` l � L y4 `A V�dC '_bN Ofln74 � tT ._ ¢ it °, ✓M� c,^ NN .W.cc V O' L _ L Cq uUN Lbdr r I U V N u, L "✓ W N P ✓ T 4�LY V ti � C V•_• 4 P N y O 71" � Ord -� VN 4 VY Lm. l V Piu L _ f> rr0- V I LW V ✓ ¢✓ V wL nU � C '" Gln Ov +O uy iOu 'tu u C •� C V O�V L W 3 G✓ u✓ C V w D r r q •i.O _ l i 'n W ii Yp a w �^ o.. L N L,c� n'�'� L L r _'". .e• V �, f-� c y_ ^ y q< Vr u�u n f, u C^ r • y lV- d � CPC � W ¢ VWL� W Ol0 +DVr L�� P iVN � POON � N✓ M I N ^ _'•� fi 01 L V y .` qC` `q }uu NN VWC Yyr WL� LNy � CAVL j Or yr N l . I ✓NO V y C n N OW.!!^ W .n O _ LL j•_ " J w M PNy em W �o f ` q w € W✓o — 'c' � N m R V � ¢4 P 91 G N O v 2 uqi n rn 4' q [¢ 11.G rl) 9 L L �•` $ 'n 1 l N L ' D N u V.'Y \C V .. C P l W rn 0I ?Y .�O O A a✓ rai, CJ S � L W V m u . n i 11 O u y P �S C v' y y O P ^ l ....(r �. 1.. W ) P C•, '. r--L u q V,uO '..^._ � Pr V 'O ¢u `u L•r� y¢L i W,'� O rJ ^ O ,Ln W r4J N u ..- .rr tG/ � rn N✓i n�n �•- ` d.L'.u, r^ �q. ` c c'4L LNo u _ v cy V4u �i� uv ? u W rNr rw.W '4 Li L N._ Lr u � CNV � NNLw q r_ gy��:V J rC, 4.y-4 •_ �L . <r f�` N4 �✓O r0 u rr V WCV� wN�r Nr ,� ,. L .� N (y �V 4..Py lL yO d C AW4 .lN puV .._ LLL ruV Eru � TN ✓ nrC S d dO L M c N rOn r L O T L p YV- • 'n C ¢V W i 9 > W ..ram w r W '.j ✓ai N" N v,bN � a dT ¢ �4 ud ^ C�• V yV� NOG T6'n J4 4..•N. 0 Nf$ Gtn J 1y' ,gr, qqA ` � d • DU L: P u d'n DW` mOL 'OyY > •O.r� W VI DVi d NVl rror ism he �i✓ rnmo N wc✓ �v .` P`L a.°L.r t• > `w .d I ¢A N y✓6 ' 4. 00 N._ uN +L-VL 4V0u W ay 'UNPL L� `V qV( � ,r', C9 qWu 9w �yd VAT uL Pu 6N N ]•. > � i �. i WVVq LU V✓ O'40 r >.OW ¢jV � J� L•� O'NC ^ PA 6y: V J J q N l Y .r. qt.n Pc rn� No ^ifs P•- .-i y- o wm o Ju ri �v'c ^•-•magY �= is ^c 1� T maxi Ou ,0,� n •.C• V OV 4r L UV'S ¢ 5NIV fU tD rr 6Vr 4N tiV.-•r .0 9 D � N A` L ^ V W` .r W ppr_r � UG Er 3 zA moo✓ � ': Ili � \� �� �I \ 10 y= V \� f•1 V dML O ♦]� I LJ O V ~I ll �� •C V 1' 1{U Y r 'l V d N V I C L W T ,✓ V N L NUL�y 6 O Cu ' � ✓ C V F O �� L y N 'LR r O C V 9 C ' 1T T O _ N 4 u • ' L 6' yVi `I I r i L O v T u O � C•� M b C� U N N ` 'Y V r, 6 C 1 �r-G fCl G^ ^ �' ci ' C O V V V N d •"•^ u V m u w G C 6 LL •� 1 r� GUC ¢ Nun > CO LN LJ ti "• CLV' VGyV1 LNLC N NO 4 � Ny' LN rl �mu _W vn VL_ L. ` O ¢C � OV � V� O •V^ VL N . OCV / 4C Ct- ..C-V �V I. . L+� JJ 60� LLN W OV VIN.V ✓O NN q q .� •�� y V O 4•._ rn W .-. C NIF L r"rir V V'L u V' W( L u O ✓ n O tLL V 9 V^✓_ l r 9 �V V T C ' _• U > G N�lrr 4r._ ¢•NV q' {••_ � V✓ C W'VUr- U._ V. mI N �,r _ V � W W Y uw N 1Z- l Wi �' U V•-u il. urL- � ^ ^ ,J ' ¢LWLL qq 9wT AO r .-u Cir N nC f,n•>,tL ,^.,V L o I'i L V L•.N c J .•. ✓ G V F4 rlr m C✓ L Y W N = ") V i ¢ V P W d I� r6�� y k'V✓Y✓✓ CN 'bC �u iV 3 JAY LW••d- S lL NC)Vr luLd U n' CV L✓ l� � 4rb NrI VC✓VV u ^ � j'rr ¢4 V ,Ay-_) d ' VV CUW •� C✓dW P V "' V9 a0 .I� � ✓ l��9 r>ir N [�.-N ( q O . • W N r .4 N N U C u >rn M .. C _L'•l_. _ .r ^ 6 ^•' n1 (il J V V �W�v l v u M L' ^ V V•r- �J V > W6V NL PJP rtiuL Orq.4V qU..L. t..CN LLL `�Nq v PC PN >•� `<, �ONON n¢�^� r0 C su LwD V Q,C,OI Y - ✓J 6P r G •U L U S.L �d VL. NOV - i._ ta AO O O V Wuw Lp'«a• Wr- LVY � � V � O r' WY p o > >�. ^w. N c L u ¢ �S A '^ w.- 9 °, ✓ u = G .'-. u ' C•� 1V L V-W.r T V V�V J L✓ V g l C (mil L 1 O r � O„�V C.0 �Jru V V y V N r P n,fJ o%'.Orr O W E.L. ` L p i. u u w P y L o u•_i ^ v.u q ^ M N p 4 sU, ^r q V gPuc m ^ OLP Lu tr 00 uq W._ 4 O wu _ L Zd ull � oLmua N._ 4Y�� cbN cr IS'4 '- o .t.^ m PON � On Win. ocAe .`. ' F = ✓ rj c c✓a r'y L L N¢nc � c o'^ yM�.r_ u m✓ . � N n `A -)... �v VC LG COOr9W fl.�vy u9 ✓'J �-JN ^)W� 9 N+ V 9yNV ¢ � LlJ W•r- V (6f .I LYrVNuuOW Off` Was'r' OVO+ L] �a0 �✓•u QUy Nu „� WfJ � v� ^ Y �b •�L VL + C S'y `. _..- ._ Dl•-G LY-u > OVV Wp ✓ '[u._ OV1f Jr ,Lr. r° y 'V N✓ ^` li � T. NNf^V W N C.r- ¢ O W 4,._✓ d._✓� •_ L C _ l w._ g N M Vy rJ f1 Q 7 '�O 6 C m T}r V ^V N 4-M u✓ c'•VJ M u L .J u u N V u 'b ` O G •- V {�. V ^ O 't a n.� •_._�✓ O p O L._u N m V_ N P V^ ._A'_r m 4. 'n L N C N a N N F t y a W ¢N N 9 g V 4 N 9 N „ N q L .•. W q to N •_ L. 1� 06u `• N m ruw rWCy J.• V `C O y • W •- l N V 4 N V r N W N C ,y N L� ^ m✓ W > C V >V.1'•.r V' ,NJ L g G N J W V L o u✓u C✓W✓ 4, r ^ q t- C �C p (+ > lY LCVC ✓ WCVtC V J� � , P N y Vrl, ry•jry�✓N�•� 69 aq LV Z U'^ Ou u 1I•L.r O 'C 9 }N O u ^y C L N r 4't. 6r N ✓ r¢V V ✓ A d ` D Wy.•. uO,lg6 V OC PL P�L V LY V��(> O•_N rVG J C ¢ Y,6 4F-: V O�1_.� �r 4 VU C (y 4�`•...•I O NCO^ ZgW a C ''{ L �-O a Y •% - u ^ 1 V F O. O9T��fiL�V{ L.•_� � t.. L✓V N • V LC_-4. IL Nr LC > G > L > ny^ V y wr r� q0 O. N 4 4O9 yC ¢VVisV N GV O N W NL ^ q i r P Pq o v N =Y¢ ... .r� yL o L ii'✓� _ •'`4' My � v. ' "N e is N ✓a o l yn ca V o � rn ^.>. G Y? o o u N A it y 4.✓.✓o m .. d c C'�.' L Nu _ ^ I �^ ` N ./n• V nd u .¢>. — VT V L O N F ' 4 q N O F q �r V N 6r L .r C� wl N p .rl Y ". �N d Y [' .. ✓jr C r Y 2 Wu OL 4 V � 2 qV ` L •J lr`O ✓ O.r_ OrN 9C p C6 1 N N L ` P � ' uV _ � rA. _ ✓A 'YVM^ V N ^a NN CV j ^ C l V � L LL C W ✓ ^ C O V M V� O Lr A V ` � u� G V L� In � N ✓ rt O V u y� u d V i u Or. u i u V W —V y N w i �W 1 n N V C J ;V p •w L rV N._ ^ l� w p �� N w A c c rn � w ' '�L+ r � L C. c v N a..- t c' n n`• i :.� ^� V".Jrno �� r cvc u� a, u i4 Yn.. uiE b I AJ�.J m L piJ ✓ � 1= U p L {1 O r G N W My w•_— Nf: L '. [ b L F� ._Y r nYr .4.•^ r. L :... Z. � Y✓ .V N L .:! F rrr. m � w. r�i.1 � ¢C O T L^ q rr 4r L ` ` ^ lr Y M 4✓ r I a^m l ` L P_ a 4 L✓ . LL •�N u C A Q a N F u�y q t N� d� V Yr U V G✓ �, ^ n W � rn _l c y✓ N .- � w_i .w. c a c /per Y17io F .. I �' � J.� y a na• L �� .1� �b A N v¢i n U a L i L L✓ O G t O N 4 L �1.� N b ~ O .- � ._� N V a s a pVN Y __ ^ V y L N u � .\rlrt d 4 L ¢ L •L ¢ `_y F= C� ^ L ^ 2 .=il q .•^q V u O m V( r.s ti Y d�` V W C l r A\.. q O P P I W J 'u u GGd! C q „' V �' w L T q O N N i1•_ U.L O V N CI S W L ^ V �J N N T✓ �N 'N U N n d m 4 �P O C Y V .Y..I N 0 2 rn L A a Y u•.O. M1I� ^ P b 9 LL u `V �'' �N C C C u m O N c L L`'L� 4 q O r � N �W u V N • V V L h W .V. V �7 ✓ l ^✓ O V ^l C n d✓W GI J r.^ Yr L L •m _ ••• d A W OL C�^ C Vy pw O dL Y ` L '�� C d� �•y^ Ou ^•_ ^ > a... )_rr u Q 1 N 4 lOn J t '� 4 W L L � „ ✓ 7 N Y J 1.. 1. Ir L V nl J N V 4 L4 C 1.1 Y o r 11 L y O�. n N , N Y A•w. • y Ovr o �N O n 4 f/�' vd• Lw�� A U� O r.. V'u I q0 ` N ` � ' �r G .t�� / .CJ LN .`i.2L O .Flr CU.L•lV _ 1 ¢ G2eS Orr P^r YW V ✓ V 20 C • T ✓Tf wV� N¢ O� d OL •L J:nL 4K N N • G j 4 POu CV 6' O•+uu n VL 4U L NLW .r� u{J 'lJy q Ua ^ Vw !� LPL R'VNq DLO` d_ CC rTOu 1;Z L .rl N Yr ry wl \ ¢NC VLVy N �OO d Nu L.`...^ \ MdW Or ✓L NN ._OIL yT L K� /t �✓q WNW Cl � u ] • 1 ^ +fV V nl O. ;, 4r N4 a,> .VC. uy l J ✓ Lu qy I`u ` ) .. 7Y! � W > Vl. Zi p C �� �y !i.Y u u � .V. ✓ u.V \Oi n ul rye. m�✓ 0O F� a � r., u^ V ? P Vr li LI�p ALadi u.r VLF nnr LN LSfj w/W V L' 'y Ujpg1 C CiC GO � OI .o .0.= O L 'LL 4C 71O 'LLN -✓ n)V ✓ CJ Cn•� — li. a^� ` CO T^ � L✓• ` � G NC � IJ Y. C rLLLr qPN NG OUN L' V Tf. •- 11 Nli {� �V Yw Y ¢u Sar C DNS CWN q � 4nl' N� l QT YIL jl N✓ lrr r'v cad + c Na.+m o o m ii n�. LL•. L�� w ` lo _m_ � ` % Y`vl iNi._.` N n N -u r n O V�� qq N r 06 C� O✓ A_ '1wC rG. q✓ yn \' r✓ w V^ .✓n�� Y9 u YOC �j Y Yu �W ! ALL— fNC N i0 ✓ CoV✓ LN N K^ p� u.w.r v W YK > .� yVy l' ✓W Yr� VOrN ]OLL dy k. ` 1f �QN C ✓ l'J V L� W ON^ L q M L :.. �t L C •• •V U{d. p> C l ` L Y 1 C C �q u \V.q ¢A V V u r r•'In ..� �u W iO F• >L µi, U✓ 6.0 r�Q WL L UVM 6L V._ W q fL NW NJr-h 1-1 CV O.� ✓y 4M A W W P u r IIY11 d N \Ip� /. ' Y N lD m P Al RESOLUT[ON NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 81-08 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE ZONING FROM R-1 TO R-3/P.D. FOR 5.85 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE- OF HIGHLAND AVENUES, EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE. APN 201-252-32 WHEREAS, on the 9th day of 3uly, 1981, an application was filed and accepted on the above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 14th day of October, 1981, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed zone in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; 2. The proposed zone change would not have significant impact en the environment nor the surrounding properties; and 3. That the proposed zone change is in conformance with the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this pro—ject will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on October 14, 1981. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 14th day of October, 1981, Planned Development No. 81-08. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Planned Development No. 81-08. 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council . 4. All conditions of approval applicable to Tentative Tract No. 1.1928 shall apply to this Planned Development. 4,u 2 " 6 , O u r r u� ; wLN• �..`�L w a u� qN O n0• u 1 r�"Q� 9 � Q1N c � N ���V �'. rOr O u �•ZW Y N CYO L VlU ONnO ui v V \. y L OFu O d�'d �Lo u c• a � S u p N :� `• c,L a n. �TNf1 r:•rV L Op N cJ VV ur u VYyV NGAG Lev 4 W p rNCT V v - C7(] q t«Au a L; o Lp.� v _ ..v.V. +. •� no O�.r i. «li\.may _a ad i v.-o i c Y c c.cv 'N vnd. W v+� sY pY " Oyu a >L d � LP q Va•� c `CT Y P L F.� Nitu Y 0c` Amr � miun Ze• nV. F. O A ON L OY A a CLV VU Pil s 6 u O 0 u O V u d rn O LL^ N G V-� V •.O V C iJ O C L L r) r` iQA''TI OYL u a PV .. Owe+ V G APVL Nd �u� 4 r' N'� LW LCY A � ^ f LGu � M06 � f1V �C L� L � NVTO V YGeju W L �rGU � L Uri OrelO �CiT V N L. l L N W a •V., l= P n n v N N N[O.0., A d G G ` V N y L l V W ` W •G.. �TJ d N py p •p. q.�♦ � N V L'^Omi OVn rN' u 6t0 VO T•LNV 4p NY Cn '� Lq nni 0^i 2 LLLOG RNL ' 1 I I I I VraVA ^O 4Lw• LALT ^ A lL^u e S Resolution No. Page 2 r+ APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ;y ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission 1, JACK, LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning `:ommission held on the 14th day of October, 1981, by the following vote- to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: r. ' NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: a'. 5' 4; �r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CAnruti STAFF REPORT m � r a O O z F' Z_ OCTOBER 1.4, 1981 �� y 1977 I TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development BY: Curt Johnston , Assistant Planner 1 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS14ENT A14D PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 81-05 (TT 9369 and 11173) - BROCK - A change of zone from R-3 to R-3/PD for a total planned development of 117 patio homes on 18.2 acres of land located at the southeast corner of 19th Street and Archibald Avenue - APN 202-181-23 & 24 ABSTRACT: The applicants nave submitted development plans and two tract maps for the above-describer project in order to gain consideration and approval by the Planning Commission. Approval of this project will neces- sitate the approval of four integral parts of the project; a Negative Declaration for environmental assessment, the rezoning of the site fn)m R-3 (Multiple Family Resirential ) to R-3/PD (Multiple Family Residential/Planned Development) zone: the S;te Plan and building design, and the Tentative Tract Maps. The project "% a: been reviewed by both the Design and Growth Management Review Committees ana has passed the residential assessment. system. Staff has prepared a detailed Staff Report, related Resolutions, and Conditions of Approval for your review and consideration. BACKGROUND: The applicant, M.J. Brock & SGns, Incorporated, is requesting approval on their proposal in order to develop 117 patio homes on 18.2 ac. of land located on the southeast corner of 19th Street and Archibald Ave. (Exhibits A & B). The application is for a Planned Development with a density of 6.42 dwelling units per acre. The project site is in the R-3 zone and General Planned for Medium Density Residential (4-14 dwelling units per acre). The project site is presently vacant, undeveloped, and contains little vegetation. The Planning Commission has previously approved projects for both of these tracts which consisted of a total of 114 condominium units as shown on Exhibit C. Approval of this project will make the previous approvals null and void. ANALYSIS: The project, as shown on the attached Development Plans, is consistent with the General Plan since it falls within the density range designated. In addition, the proposed style of housing and subdivision is consistent with the R-3 zone. Surrounding land uses and zoning is described as follows: Item H s ; Staff Report Ah PD 81-05 (TT 11173) -2- October 14, 1981 LAND USE ZONING North Commercial Shopping Center C-1 South Vacant, with approved Multi- R-3 Family project (TT 11608) East Single Family Residential R-1 West Single Family Residential R-1 & R-3 The project is being developed in accordance with the State Subdivision Map Act as well as the City's Subdivision Ordinance and Zoning Ordinance. The proposed zone change is consistent with the General Plan. All set- backs, building separations, parking, and open space requirements of the Zoning Ordinance have been complied with. The majority of the proposed structures are detached zero lot line single family structures. Sixteen of the units are duplexes attached by a common wall along the lot line (Exhibit D). As can be seen from the Site Plan, the front yard setbacks vary from 6' to approximately 35' . All units include a two-car attached garage. Where driveways are less then 20' automatic garage door openers will be required. Seventy-one additional guest parking spaces are provided throughout the development as shown on Exhibit E. Fifty-nine spaces are provided through- out the street while twelve spaces are provided adjacent to the recreation center. Texturized pedestrian crosswalks will be provided on site in order to form a continuous pedestrian system. Recreation facilities including pool and an active play area for children have been provided at the center of the development. Two points of access have been provided into the project. One off 19th Street at the north end of the project, and the other one off Victoria at the south end of the project. No access is provided off Archibald Avenue. The entryway from Victoria Street will line up with the entrance to Tentative Tract 11608 on the south side of Victoria Street. Full street improvements will be required along 19th Street, Archibald Avenue, and Victoria Street. Improvements will include, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street light, landscaped parkway, and pavement. Forty-four feet of dedi- cation is required for the Victoria right-of-way while on Archibald Avenue, a Lien Agreement for the future construction of a landscaped median island will be required. The interior road system is a double loop pattern which meets the minimum design standards of the Zoning Ordinance at 32' curb to curb. The streets, landscaping, and open space will be maintained by the Homeowners' Association. r ,f l .� Staff Report PD 81-05 (TT 11173) -3- October 14, 1981 The preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan has been reviewed by the Grading Committee and given conceptual approval . The applicant will be required to install a portion of the master planned storm drain in ArclFibald Avenue through its current terminus at 19th Street to the existing inlet structure at the S.P.R.R. prior to recordation of the final map. Also, a drainage study will be submitted to the City Engineer for review to determine adequacy of the existing catch basin and connector pipe on Victoria Street adjacent to the project. The catch basin and the pipe may have to be upgraded if the study warrants such requirement. Landscaping •is being provided throughout the development in accordance with standards and policies set by the Planning Commission (Exhibit F) . The applicant proposes to install landscaping and fences along the in- terior loops of the project as shown on Exhibit G. A 6' slump stone wall will border the project along 19th Street, Archibald Avenue, and Victoria Street. The wall will undulate along its entire length with the setback from the property line varying from 9' to 26' . Mounded ground cover with Oak, Sycamore, and Canary Island Pine trees, will help reduce the visual impacts of the wall , but the Design Review Committee recommended more variation in the material and design of the wall (Exhibit H) . Also, dense landscaping along the eastern property line will reduce the impact of this project on the adjacent single family residences (Exhibit I). A meandering sidewalk will be provided along 19th Street, Archibald Avenue, and Victoria Street. A detailed landscaping and irrigation plan will be submitted for approval pricr to ;ssuance of building permits. The Design Review Committee reviewed the project finding it acceptable as a style for this area. Detailed colored renderings, site plans, and building materials sample board will be available for your review at the Planning Commission meeting. Part I of the Initial Study, as completed by the applicant is attached for your review. Staff has completed the -Environmental Check List and field investigation and has found no significant adverse impacts on the environ- ment. If the Commission concurs, a Negative Declaration should be issued. CORRESPONDENCE: A public hearing was advertised in The Daily Report newspaper on October 2, 1981 and 83 public hearing notices were sent tr, surrounding property owners within 300' of the project site. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to consider all matters relative to this project. If the Commission concurs with the findings of Staff, adoption of the attached Resolutions with recommended Conditions of Approval would be appropriate. �I f r ( Staff Report PD 81-05 (TT 11173) -4- October 14, 1981 Respectfully submitted, Jack Lam, AICP, Director Of Community Development i. JL:CJ:cd Attachments: Exhibit A - Vicinity Map Exhibit B - Site Plan Exhibit C - Previously Approved Site Plan Exhibit D - Elevations & Floor Plans (7 sheets) Exhibit E - Parking Analysis Exhibit F - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit G - Typical Streetscape Exhibit H - Typical Street Elevations Exhibit I - East Property Line of the Site Exhibit J - Phasing Plan Part I - Initial Study Resolution with Conditions of Approval �i r S`, C.U.P. J ,14 .7 el 17. W" TENTATIVE TRACT No. 11 JV3 AND TENTATIVE TRACT No. 930a QD. SITE trriuzAinoN AND AstrIfUS MAP (MIX= NORTH re CITY OF ITEM: 4", ANP RAINCHO CUOUNIONGA TITLE: j-zxncf4 M.*\-r PLANNING DINTSION F-XI iIBIT: SCALE: 4 i l� J/ D�O • �� _ zf STAMInCAL SUMMARY NUKIRM �_� y X�� n t•, -- PRODUCT TYPE D04+; SRN ACRES OF PATuD HCAfe 0.42 102 117 4 PARINO(EGUMOD Ce2 SPACES PER HOMM — 234 GARAGE SPACES 23 NI9NOR SPACES :1, „Il ...•may. [X_ _ 257 SPACESI PANKNOPRosrom 234 GARAGE SPACES �� OB NSROR SPACES soa 4lwn ruM ,a SPACES ' �yw —� -- 3p5$PACtS PRp17b�D VICTO I p DEVE �o O. a�L.AO�.� a SONS, m 1\ORTI-fl �C�ITYO.]I� � [� � �{�_ A1_ANCI 1O C�.T\_[ INIOi \�13A TITLE: -SIT{ 1 L rti1�l PLANNING DIVISION SCALE: <w.lrr.r !v.Ra.nw.c t.r At _ — N�— fit j y iIR rill �—L��__--7 � � 1 � _—, e"� ,�1 �•' �, dam_ I ,:.� . '�`---- t �� lI I SIR _ fit 1 `m '� - � '•°_ - j i....l�l:a1 r; ,• I ` I.ir •fir=_ --' ;m .''` ; ll.r� is I I • , ' — 1 d2'iS)ss I �R it ail}x•1 ITF\1: 1I 4 L TITLE: IE FL A "XI11131T �G SCA1.1 MTS M�p70R NA IPLAO� >wuree� -CT r.wv rwaw..r rt III G/ 1. d4 �,�• �Ir zPLUr In fitI upi I r r 3 CL RANCHO CUCAj\,,j0,\(N E i - TITLE:_SELL-VA-iI-1c W S PLANNING DIVISION I XI III31T: "(II—SCALE: �ZY SHOT I OF-7 11 „m 1! CIL� - .M 'ter ❑. -� i,� ' t,-•i •w,•.� ,` - 14 LJ.I:IYI .Illx•l'� Y• • �.Y'. Yrw�iw_ 'Iq �' ilI • 4111 • • � Y.M+ � _ _ __•� ICI • . . • �;:IL;J •I • ...M.-. • '-r Y.M) • 1 r �.-�^�� ";s;�� _ `vim 1 "O'er_ .....__^_�+�'�Y t - '• I �� '•y�Itl/ ql 7'7,y VICTORIA PLACE A DEVELOPMENT BY MABROCK.&SONS,,INC. INIORTH carry oi- ITEM: 'I a v _ +! PLANNING DIN ISIU.I EXHIBIT: - o SCALI (ITS b:,. z aF 7 i I f I � { 00 om' - Dtt EC ca cc ujm CL J I� • p, 11T�1 '� �N •G M c 9L 3 r ` Fi I109 C Li ire el �* O L LU CITY or- ITEM: RANC'HQ' CUCATMONGA TITLE: I'L,t'L\NI\G MITSION EXHIBIT: 1b it 3�r- 7 I , J ,1 1 I ' i '•. 1 1�1 rhk 1 ' i , F • r • f r " � Ir I !i- � 11 � 11 I �• e , i S'rMAi•III±- .....yr :11 t�_=�:=—�—,�.•'C•..1�L£"`t�N 1 ��.%ae�v._ ,i- `.�•-_ �1(l lL..__ LvitlC_ _ WIT has VICTORIA PLACE A DEVELOPMENT BY N9ABROCK& SON%INC. NORTH CITY OF p - R.A\'CHO CUCATNIONGA TITLE: Ley�rrc Ns PLANNIING DNISION EXI 1.131T- ��•` SCALE= 1`Ks sa 7 ii :ate . t 711n117 1 •_� I 91n1n6 lan uearoom• ' ¢iblun ,Adrtcm i � r LAWnti I II(� 1 Q 6arltp i � c Second Floor Plan First Floor Plan NICTCRIA, PLACE A DEVELOPMENT BY W.BROCKC&SONS,INC. NORTH CITY C 11 RAINCI-10 C UC.NINIO\GA TITLE. ELZACIL 'E-'L/2,I -- PLAtiNUNG DIVISION E.XIIIBIT: 712 SCALE: r)�� to of 7 t daft j 6edmvm Living . •.• � � QYYi Ymnlly - Dining .r •Llo..a --- --- i :.111 3 e.aloom a Wack k:I ` s.oe IWI xitchm.�� �.� .�.. ;.;Ay ' 1 � ' 1I ONeoom t 1 u.l.�it..� I.�IM:�II 1 'y...q .—._.. A I.iUl1�(i.11l �t ll�--� 4[��J i gMtoomt DeEnwmt � 1 Omngs Zvvvv S -and Floor Plan. N✓ O p' -- — First Floor Plan ' Floor Plan . ADEE�®BABBPMENTT Y M.J. ROCK & SOWS,INC. ' FORTH CITY OF ITL•Xl: flJt� RANCHO CUCATNI®NGr� TITLE: .. PLAT NNING DI\rLSIQN ILKI1113IT: `h�� SC%.LI:: NT2� i � 4 FEED w a . I ! -_- — -4- lo , I.. ` 7— I FtY STATISTICAL S'4JAAAAA . - Ri000CTTYPE OEMBIIY AGES OFHMM >` % i_ 77 `•t ____ PATIO/WIIE SI :ax la �., 4 mrotor uw 234 CLARAGE SPACES 23 V6ROR SPACES 1 287 saACEB 1' I - I PARIRIG FROVO® —! 234 GARAGE SPACES OB VWTOR SPACEb laar vwuwu " "' II ✓ / w 12 RECREATION CENTER SPACES i W"MA PLACE A DEVE]DPMENr BY MA BFMK & SON% M NORTH CITY 014 ITEM: ` RANCHO C,UCANIONGT 1 TITLE.: PLAINNING DIWSION7 L'XI 11BIT:_ "-SCALE: � • I 11.E 'I 1 .� I i. �' '� TI + yyyy, � � "hF 11 ih � �.,. M— •IK.Y 1 '.�$ �� ���n�n �� �r�_ q� ,�1 OTC !'• Wr: l l f�� r�61?�'r �1�lf;sm nil hit t fob i ! ALA.. 1, 1 • '. ow e,e9►'m.pP4.. Rio kv it � gllAiC 'nnln liP114 �1t fb SOM I �•'a � s yY g�•e•b uuitl'J'lll ,AN. 1� 111 �' R i•�,a. W� i"'s0 ud' tl,yZl �, tip, 1Y: � •. ,�Jp � �� ..c-. i• A�� ✓�4 Y Y V. lk Was $ ..•i� rnKa � �dllll�� ��i01 t3l tteo I�. a .tf � tiles PEW, } ye1�p °_b f ' � 1 1 , 1 I y"•;1 I 1 1 .1 `.' yl � • L. j'. W■ r r N 17 IL UML l= 2 ►. � ;, 10, c uul ' 4 N' k� y• "�'it ,�� tip. .LC.f► � ��i� ' t S APE VICTORIA r; rr ,L wE n. •• ESONS� IC CITY Or, ITEM: 44 NORTH PLANNING DFOSION EXHIBIT: SCALE: Lt 1 [ , YGN Y + r ! • •I ift^LU�'SS.ate FS� � •t�_�'� �: ?uj t , ILI 0. a �cc ru -- .. 1 • 1 �I � `.� III. I r ,1 I � J ^ I i. I 1 � t I Y L I 1, �1 I! {{ I s ' Ill I u ,Lt ' .. mil. J 4�!�! I {� 1 �, �/d„/•/.may j r - — _ — STATOS nCAL SUMMARY MAN xoHOWe 2 r¢caEAnoN arn[ta 7LI-1 4 3awxvs •:�••• w•••• -- TOTAL 111'1400" [N� ,.,1Mc, IR. n M VICTORIA FLAG A DEVELOPMENT of Mj &90M & S0rA NG FORTH CITY OF � ITEM: RANCHO MANIONTCA PUNNING DIVISIaN r i CITY OF RANCHO CUCA140NGA T.NITIFil, STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $70.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of .this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committae will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2 ) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental. Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Victoria Place Tentative Tract No's 9369 and 11173. APPLICANT 'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: _ M..) . Brock & Sons, Inc. 714/529-8170 1698 Greenbriar. Lane, Suite 224 Brea, Calif. 92621 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: m,-1••rank william5 7141096-58ig Associated EnP.i.neers, 316 East "E" Street, Ontario, Calif. 91764 LOCATION O" ')JECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEI. NO. ) East_ side of ibald Avenue between 19th Street and Victoria Street. _ APN 202-181.-23 & 202-181-24. LIST OTHER. PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND TILE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS : Encroachment Permit-19th Street Improvements, Caltrans; White Slips, Real _Estate Commission: rise orotpr-tion. Foothill rirp Dist . : Sewpr & Water. Cucamonga County Water Dist. ; Public Improvement and Building Permits, City of Rancho Cucamonga. a-t ; PROJECT DESCP.IPTTON DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: A Planned 'Unit Development of 122 atio F+omes with 51 Lots of the South portion to be developed as Tract 9369 and the remaining 71 Iors of rh � Norr h_ nnrtion [n f deg 7 peri � T � 77 �•{ The project contains 119 Residential Lots and 3 Common Ownersh+ o Lots- for recreation and landscaping �4 purposes. I ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUIL'•DINGS, IF A.Ny: 18.20 Acres Gross or 16.28 Acres Net. There are no eristin buildings. Pro osed buildin s will include 119 structures for an approximate total of 242,040 S.F. , including_ g garages. DESCRIBE TliE ENVIP.ObT!lENTTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INPOR,ti_ATION ON TOPOGPnPY.Y, PI AT.TI'S (TREES) , ANIUlRLS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SUR.^.OUNDING PF.OPEFTIES, AND TILE DESCRIPTION OF AINY r EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS) Property slopes more or less uniforrnly from North at approximately �C'. 39L. An unpaved drainage ditch drains southward along the South 3/4 oL the G West boundary of: the property. The site is vacant with the exce tion of ww several large trees and some brush along the ditch. The ditch will b e i` clonr!•d and filled and iirii.na_ve flows carried Tn u.�Anr�ro +nrl drains wihfn Archibald Avenue. Soils are generally well sand Rraded and well drained alluvial gravels, cobbles and boulders of great depth. Identifiable wildlife i_nsluder, Jackrahh ' Cottontail Rabbits Ground S uirrels Go hers Coyote,Lizards, Crows, Mockingbirds, lloves Pigeons F and Sparrows. R} There are no cultural„ historical or scenic aspects. Property has been farmed t or years. Lands South of Victoria Street are vacant acreane To the Wr_st across ,. Archibald is single family residential and an existing Mobile Home Park. To the North across 19th Street is an existing neighborhood shepp'ng center. ;j To the East is single family residential separated by a masonry wall Is the project, part of a larger g project, one of a write of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant enviromnental impact? No. 4 WTLI. TITS P.1'OJECT: YES NO _X 1 Create a substantial change it ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration! X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal. services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. ) '. X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5: Remove any existing trees? How many? 8 X 6 . Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as tonic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above : ( 5) 'trees to be removed are within thr_ drainage ditch to br filled and in the Archibald Avenue right- 01`-way. IMPORTANT:T s If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and -correct to the best of my Rnowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Develof+runt Review Committee . _ ) gate_ signature C_ � Title ChJLQ °J' ► �!+11}!✓ RCSInc`rTIAL C013sTrrrC:IRw The following information should be S old Division in order to aid inpassessintottheCf Rancho Cucamonga School district to accommodate the proposed residential development. ability of the Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No. : IN. J . Brack 8 Sons . dne.Tr.9369 Specific is Locatior. of Project; N/E Corner of V foria 8 Archibald PHASE I PrIASE 2 PF-A---SE 33 1• Number 'if singIe ~� P'U,SF 4 TOTAL family units: 4 - IS � 41 2. Number of multiple family units: 4 4 8 3. Date proposed to 1182 begin construction: 4/82 6/82 _ 4. Earliest date of ~ occupancy; 5/82 9/82 11/82 _ Modal 4 and ° of Tentative S. Bedrooms Price Rance Plan l (26DR) N/A 5 2 . Plan 2 (3BDR) N/A Plan 3 3BDR) W/A� r-- = , 1 10 y i Y ' RESIDL ."rIAL CONSTP.tICrIOu The followinq information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga : Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. 23amc of Developer and Tentative Tract No. : Broct & Sons . Inc. Tr. 11173 Specific Location of Project: S/E Corner of Nineteenth Archibald PHAsr Z PV iSE 2 PHASE 4 PIIASF. 5 TC TAL Numi:er of single family units: 32 30 6 ? Number of multiple family units: _ E 2 1.' .#at-e proposed to egzr. .construction: l0 82 r-arliest date of occupancy: 1/83 3/83 Modal 4 and a of Tentative Bedrooms Price Rance )an I ( 2BDR) N/A 7 3 lan 2 ( 3BDR) N/A 21 14 __. lan_• 3BDR) • N/A 10 15 r r yr �L 1 l RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMIMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 9369 AND 11173 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 9359 and 11173, hereinafter "Map" submitted by M.J. Brock & Sons, Inc. , applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a total planned development of '17 patio homes on 18.2 acres of land in the R-3 zone, located on the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and 19th Street, APN 202-181-23, and ,q into 118 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on Oc`.ober 14, 1981; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approva' of the Map subject tc all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the P' anning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SEr,rION 1: The Planning Commission makes the folluwing findings in regard tc, tenEfive Tract No. 9369 and 11173 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) TLe design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim ana proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of develop- ment proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within j the proposed subdivision. f; ti 1� /+I Resolution No. Page 2 (9) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 9369 and 11173, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. All fire access and turn around requirements of the Foothill Fire District shall be met and the final map shall be adjusted accordingly. 2. Dense landscaping adequate to buffer the adjacent single family homes shall be provided along the eastern tract boundry subject to the approval of the Planning Division. 3. Side-on garages and combined driveways shall be used wherever appropriate, subject to the approval of the Planning Division. 4. On-street parking shall be clearly designated with striping. 5. A minimum rear yard setback of 20 feet shall be main- tained on all lots within the subdivision. 6. A 15 foot pedestrian path with a 5' meandering side- walk and fully landscaped shall be provided at the rear of lots 1, 2, and 3 from the recreation center to Archibald Avenue. 7. A detailed wall design for the street front shall be submitted and approved by the Design Review Committee. 8. Approval for the previously approved Bract maps for this site shall be null and void. ENGINEERING DIVISION 9. The applicant shall install a portion of the master- planned storm drain in Archibald Avenue from is current terminus at 19th Street to the existing inlet structure at Southern Paci`ic Rail Road prior to recordation of the map. The cost of installing the drain shall be credited to the storm drain fees for the protect and the City's standard storm drain reimbursement agreement will be executed to cover contribution which exceeds the amount of these fees. r ; Resolution No. Page 3 10. The southerly right-of-way line of 19th Street shall be realigned to meet existing right-of-way line for the adjacent parcel to the east. 11. Prior to recordation .,' the map, a drainage study for the project shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review to determine the adequacy of the existing catch basin and connector pipe on Victoria Street, adjacent to the project. The catch basin and the pipe may be required to be upgraded if the study warrants the requirement. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I , JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of October, 1981, by the following vote- to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: iI p - 1' b y q � A N q ✓ i �— O � O H •J 'e [•. L A N ��L � OC N MO � C !tV y j r, L 4 O u n L u OVCr L O [.t o V O A N A _ ` O y ✓ V... •i 4 � N l _ N_j C y a a�L � d u _ V .. 4 .. •`rr V 4 Y D� 4' n p N m rp C p N V p V � G « cW o y -' « arm �v`' � -$ ✓ ��� oq� � oc ✓. 4 � m p✓ �. � i. Ac.•cw � ['�� o a uo L o L ba..`.. cam^ v c � � - N c _ 4 n � ._ 'c N.`. _ _ „ 'a:i a ✓..`.'✓ mc� nncr N c .-L = = � F' —,r N A ✓ c`-rn « p=r "N6 c Vo � .._ oV�o`.N.�`' n r✓ �' U i L p L•' a p L •. n C G r- ��✓ � .. A T V ✓L u i rrOi C W _u uru ._ V ✓r N '_ lO InNU._ r � yL1: VN � yw —T r0 ?V d l 7 G V .�i _N U V^ G 4 y ti.� �✓V I N V V u u L— vi ✓ V y • n r'•O• VO � � y � .' O V nrn�- _ A <l� ✓r ErT OG NV:v rtrr [. � u � 4 �� w �« �« m �O 'u N s« « qu a ; � 4 S rn• �o i+—n E. N f' � ti 4 �P fr '� L r✓ � _ Y-� — C C 06 GdL O NW VQrNCa d WP �IrN IV L._N14 6 W y •n V p 9 „N ; IT O L P > N•`_ W u V C d G N.r. ` '""W y '^ q CLl3f Q uW WLp00� L W, LI <l✓t7« OC pN D 46 NC fl A ; pNQI V^ u_ YVr1q O L✓ un 10 p' YYNCf n U i V _6 V L✓r.`,. �� D ` �� N �P A✓ co `.L. —°O W�va' o= Dy ✓ « 4cru � oT o� n 4 � O p rJ a v V N.A O U- W 4 N � � .��� •^ + > �O � .qi K — LiL � W I O7r y Vl«•r y—qm N.N. � 0.. a:` VLCW u- 4� mO C W— Ltd 6f N✓ NV�✓ N uru [4j4 -_•_ NC'V l.Li V •O• n .`. L 4 O..- y O p ✓ y g V N a m T O V N y V� O u C !'. A � •-V•J rr r'r V+ O L 4 P_ N ✓ D p m � C V LJ .Ti �t O p N a V nCI C._p•.C.u U= C iI T V= N C O� A C 4 V A V � — ` A •-•p .- a O ,� -ri N.`N yu A + .rOi 'j Na dui uNr. A NN - auL V 6� p C. 4r• Vr[y �C m viO N yr W._ rti Y rL- Y WW J l ANt. t YL.. W NSw`. r O (�V H V VL✓q } 4O 6 ^i w O q w a y — L O fpr C C 00 Yq 2 O ND pu N Y V._ y C u ifa v iE �z �c •a.� � 6' L O L C N L Q ✓L L W Or V C O G,� V G � N �. A u I'yi C 6 J Orr r0 __ 4N q'� up rrO. N 9 lVp Ala ^ram pN CY. O 6 r• ar0 CC feCd yN AVC urar VOIO G9Gy 10.E r—rr0 � NL- + n, C O U LC NC Gq AT TAO C- a 9rCn.q — CC =0 L p (; � • �= ii c O ..LU. a U O LL Y r•4 •O. N y > V N C O v IS O ••"r l u `A L 4 V V � m z naclo a ✓y N N c :: W ._rn y .ny = G L O ON aN ci Oq a« C 1^L.b4 v is -� 4 �I u M P u V — rOrr d y c rLrr« C t1 n L L •.N. O J p V m T c a t^ ar4 ^N4 'o —•r., �mii 'c o ^ a p r'« O !DI OI4-, L til G dy ypr Yq rLir4C N6 S] 600 IJG CV Nrnig7 lC pN f Nyr c E ,;« ry N._G tM -\ .o^ :G u•�rr c b &A y u N r"i t rn m rL.N s a y �`.`. N n wE uV. ✓ c G— 6 I C rJ YG Cy LC6 ••^ APy U4 qV O' O'; O — S _ V LrL � N TY • Y H V P .A.L✓ � C Or ✓.� � � G C C L✓ _ O•_ A — �. Cr N JA � m �ca. 4 4`} r. a .N ��" > o '✓ooJ —.` p " Pu N `f ✓ N6 N—P ._~m }y U✓� O' � fVJa ACN 06 Vun uC ` P.i c• 00 LDS � > Oq� « � (1CN G C�q ^r 0•� J t U >•.G. fA>00 ar U < V v '� �tCy 11 y �/ �u M U D V V L✓r x••-r ,r1 4 L[`P N t d rAn q.L.. `r N V.. ^ J •r Y� V R - (' Y 4._ 4i � L f q d N N L .-. V` � l qr ._ •_— A V _� NN O N`•C• CL q� LLuu r6' Y� > 4� 4�q `L rLi Hrar N p �yrr N 4 u d N J !O N N rOir ti.ar y Y ✓ a p�~ O `\/�'� \NI�� \I.I f N ,/VW�1 \• N \/P�11I O^ _}�,�1 `N �IJA.I YC., I I N i J f 6V N. 1 1 /I I � 1 /I /I 1 •I 1 II 1 1 k fir• 1� P Pei V d N � Gil C w I ✓� C O� O L+ _vif ^ Q J — •1` v^ �.N VV N w �OV Crp ^uLu `.fY C +. _ •_« �. YX _ N � �, nc L Oo it a S^ V S L11. ^l � yfl f . � C• 4L CD �L « L L C i 'l ^L rrV. NA= uC u' L L C6 � P NO � O ulWl.•W O _JJ �P� OV ,O ]✓— v Ob UO b U '^V 4.. N N JN 'r'P W •` y_'r 4Cr f_� O 1, 6 G 1 1� V C (. O 9 v � u• � tf m n T W u i � « �w � LA /.!L•�' u ^•-l ` •f.AL � ` ✓.� V 4 �n (L^C � N N n y C.�u WNW_« «6 ` J O O L W N V 2 N H O y O f O � V .r .•r u pwY L I' 4 C� .. .ur r. � ^ aT 6 L � n 'n u V N� •- �u O N Y L '] n V-L- C'•- r.• ..'� o y ^o• r ^_ �✓ Y ly �L•-u� bc:. �� oL ° C oca v'- L.o u � 1( �•� �`"'^1 'n L ,` U N N N W y P L r L a ' m (1 y L O � O�«V \.-. 1J pN i' 1 3U � N.� y cV K} 6 Q < d �i�• V � rnLJ'' Nu � U C �]' J}�uNL ^ C ^ I.V_ Py U. LCT Cn �I yr F� O • A ^J.• ONE u ur c N V ('U` Nl;u .r N C.� � •C � •i rir � C C �w L r' _ a'.^aJ i .Wn � �^ n V m O wJ{',�V—-; Y w A V nr r _ u•G u L O N O L1I �Y O Y pp�(w��, V✓ V f .!r C C C r]^ r C u C'w_�' , O U C j I I rTn C N N u. .l L nC 6 m H N U 6 v 4 r U N 4V Su HEN NV LIS..V>� ^V4 °J yr O W N c �c n UL V.� 4 L WO •+4u NN Nnb V .Gzz ^`• r4i O L O L N 1 .J y y�s Y• ^, .^ i U l ov � r, c- W _ o (ion- �L _ _ ^ „. u ;i C'. ^ fr ' N ur .P a' •']r••6 1{r`. ✓ _ Y P w 5V V C C �'V r V yl 0 L Q� � U G N✓ S O,LO W O C ..C. N i N S r t- L L L � ']N u Cr W u b Vp NN b ♦ jy Ntl O � .= L 'Cf 00— L A^ T nl0 u ' NN4' uC �a�V .H6 w_.^ U ^� �'� VAtrj✓_J ✓� N o � OcV 4i V wy .J G NN C _VO •a0- i_'b v� m_ uL - r ^ a WN oI_ w .'v _rr.✓ 1c3•_- 6mui 'n� Nye � L r V V d U F O M l _ C✓ ( w � � K T V N 'n u u Y d E �'S rLPQ`-L� L.` �T.^.N. Cade rG✓.^ kv ^ao � ^ a � u' cc �c� _ E ^ \: N L b .'.J.�4 V C L� S Lrr� 4 V.^.^ L� V u O• L N q G u v c. O y r y �y �y •G � y r. � n �� fJ OV4 .or NVNul6 W.n � rO n o� NLV V—OC O✓ �Vy Lf WD V N -P ci c• S' ai i- m o«� 'rl� r vo YG a ` Pouf�� c `J nc N b.^ � 1 C �� G✓ V'q O Y' N an L i � v �- O'p V V� V t y y') ^ Yob v S i •' copse. r'- cnN �w f°'ib � NY c w > rJ ^y �� � c _ -° iu Naui N G� d N N C O LO .^ N4> ^_ WN O VV ^CV .J✓ L N A it�0 u' 'C L u r .1• e C u. D.0 r rn '._ G« O N u C✓r- N C 4.^r •N^ uY W -^ O. =LLOL6 O p� � rOtiS:`GA�. V L y^' V >♦r.' lC LC SlC Nu l 'q Q��_ L u. '^ VN7 'v NV.. pl ' .-w 1 J L yV(( q O u u u � N 4 V r=N� .-_ V.C Gi C C y N N�� V :n u• n .^ C 4 n u L T N .n D ^1 7 p. � �• n rur �^ N O V C' O 4 r L b.w.✓ ^ 0 4 ^O .n✓ i N Lit 1 i vrr• r°.'._ A C'r. u N ._,w) c - _ d L' u�' ar ✓�<C r o� __ a.4 ^ "' q N � U vi V O n_'a V V u 'C_ .�. fP .- C. L' 4 V N u• > rJ L V N i =C jW✓y.�rC1 N�_N Ny0 Or. � 'r' _ �•' C VWuCNO V•CVO V.q ✓✓Y t_�' G VVNV 06C VL yON ~ OIL T� 2 M1r0 r�✓ WWNp c. 14 w' ]e• .L.r4 [fin' L N•r 4N ^V—V� V� L V'f V N � J- O. V ^� �_ N u L u u U v 3 N N ✓O O, M �� C 9l C �✓r.� w_j G J � C N V 'III III iia�iiilii III iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii!I YwL _ �rrr NLL oti�> o.r N _�1bW�� `� :: ry Lam_ ^� N .._ « : _.. �•; � - L- U QL W4 P✓uO VNVN CrLrr Np. 4O u1 P6v. Ni� Vu 1�OL <r a, 1 i , ✓ N� �'_� q _ o ve j o' ? U� +]O�r 4 < P > <-u.✓ F O �� C V V .-OrV i I � -iv _ G Lam- LN^L W -rJI I m LN r �. :.= u .n D - u 3� FJ ' a`. •' •ter C -�j 4. y p � n. rr N r.-..'r t- 'r. P J T <•V T V IJ i�1 'n ..D � m u" C _ r✓ S � �. q N N d W O � ty •i .. • _ �y V. u.�� .4 � �. �^ u P V Cl S X rrr� C' ' ^� .O.✓ U u r � q O N L•V L rn L u.} m _ _ O W F� I u N N V G - O! �l•N. V u P V 4.�� L L C T O V .: V G O� •- •I L n '° = ^w '> ..✓ �. � rm..v: p m o `.'. �'�= o-.' c�:'� c' i,'. =c L T' � tLS t T�L q J \ui moo'.L W o•- L N � ••- �� m c r .'.p+.`. �� - P e• P h u Gcn � r°` oc� o• `v � � �:�w ;" GVkN �i noo �� �' lu c AL i.� I i w''1 Nc = NL �� ✓aP ^ LW� V4u u� rOP LL•.OL brV - C, V!_ y V p•' G ' F � <I-v o 0 4✓W o��' two w_n cL. c: � o�• o cr i o � c✓ �v✓ O„ ['.. NI'^ 4 7 T � D u� l- .fl n' A ` l�y NI l 'C ^ yV N V .�. ` T N N Q 1!4 l'4 '-V' 'r' N = C N -J Y Q +' l✓ 1r Y u V m N u y0.�• N W L O T L l a'L a. - <r VI ii O y.4 •]O L m`✓ w.n .0 ��) c V C d q la: .Nn n a �' I'.� LLI YYY ( pOl' w nOr 4LGy ^N LmL' � �rLO ✓ ice OL +«L .rO.WC HNlA Vr7 W Lnf W��VOV rn LJI GOO VV NrN- V'.Oi Nu N •=n 7 (j T0 V N L N« V � - N l V V mll.l ••.v n ` rc.- u y�✓i No Nn� .-N Nf3✓ N aM1 N � .mi : n-1 t ..CELL L•.- jm P N ✓u n m .W...A. a..o.Li V � Eauu r u U : r c +p LL✓ cro al c L > w w \Vi w rY. !]� �' ^W c ."', «.p- 'O ._".n, ✓ n': N >y ..N � u`• Jw �L. i K 4 Q m � u_ cNu i.. V•Ir- "vc u-VVq 'JV }= '1'UO w-L' R\ly w - rir O'AO .O. LrVy O.r]L a-> r-• L yr 0 oL > .. .-a+'a, �m✓ �v o '.n'noo W mNN Nu L G...•• '� 7- W �✓ ou. `.�Y V NDu KJLW. Ou4w4 aL q.... ..y- Wlr V u ✓ md- - iL n... 0 •pr•m �J LV�a] 'O C V - � w d L`• G4(.: L-L']LL. V 4 N Q N 1-U.Vn K N Ll � m V i V� � i .. q•'�. U w d L V CJ � CO CaN V V K Yrl ¢ Ou N r nl 4'J 1 V V m L� n O Lu br✓ u V .>r� [ ory c a N �m c P rm.L•. . � c�r O T p .� U - - ` V+J N W L L. -. ✓u C T u N U 4. � V- y V` .]V > O CO 6V .- O.U_Y ..VJ '� mLT - rLnLn V V CO V Y: O U.JCu^ Nur rCO d �..N ➢� rVO ORW D .n . L T N, rn4 U rJ ..m✓ tt�� O .W. L ' O_ G C n v G p.I V'L Ey '- 4 L N V. O C W ^ . Gn _ L n] G VO u.M1..rO uu�LLN •^V•�✓ ✓9 TV Vu 9V l� y.`- U '� > L d r >. +'n 1 ]q W_ r•^ « u V C W... C Cl Vi. l 4 C = Y 4f..r GL� N On.VC4]i-VY..v-✓NG.y�-i✓V�mVC-VL✓ .UqCi NV.Jrr NO>Vc L(6LV-T Nm I.S-.. `''V✓V✓q Vd`VWC VLW.g-..L-TT` 9G q`. C `CVC3 r`J O .C.aV .. V 6L .O✓ IV !w . - L �•- O'- d� 6N W rJLU . V W WLL O 9 ` N y-J V C L-4 C r V 4 - C LL V W✓w ...V V C G✓` P J ^ 4` - iAu+<LiNLNN _`. -^ oW �O� d a .rt":. "•ic NN` Wm qn or = ` � i <o ?' - q V V^ N 4 q T O N b L'.•- L��iL N L f\U S V U N •'- L V V v 41 L r C. M1r A✓ C N 4 q L t LL V O✓ p Y W V O ,• ^VJ `I Lr LU: NAN tC` N uT. V T VY V 4-VI W .r^VI d G ym P V > .:. aWN POP .'c. .D.w` u u ✓rrPN T. ✓ a4 ` > p +' _ s cN I u�N VIN T`C- C VPf. T NV-u4 6' uGN .Or L' E.c V'W 'C r+O4 . G' .L.• 00 VV (RO . �V✓ ... ^O7O� u O^`ll.✓ N �Lu 4 And N� T W.- O u N^ O - l' n 4 6 N L W V 4 C L ]•• Y L L ^ H V �ycE �nic L °i%iv roN P� v✓ u R.✓ oD + Vn:i TVV'-i ] CC LnO N � yL.^A •� WL -OV yLrC V V E'••• yV NP ' L O L y N•� 4 O C V C O S.' C) "V P O N l m y n _l c q:_] t O C✓ d N >... r N yN V 1L11 F'^' T C U'.• r]u p T N l .'V V L' y' L ... WL - _JL LO`-r]9 '�% � mV0 " ^JN •p.0 OV. 'N co - N •- ��V.n FNV >✓« O�V Wu O� NN +'1' alq ✓ > - aJ�� i ut. LlV- q.... in <✓ -..p. { 9nu O ol GJN NPw a N c•- O V .r.0iu« ar.-.. W...LL-i liu Nc NL Bu Vrl q M ^� FC _ TV' E a riJ� N �v✓u E i� ✓ ru_ y O4 .. F !`c IV SrFV� E� - V N✓ 6iVL W .-T'i OVIT mNm..'6 T'OT •'" .Lr. YT n �' pTC LVL15tm'. OrJ nCN ^ LOrn 1w ^'n bW6N JLNV v>igN'O ^ l C.r -J dA N ._ '� R40K C Nti�d n� F - l• l✓dS .LLnOd N .V � ^N - . C<' VL _ t- •n u O�i:W� �4 y l� r. L U.• • N N �, V N r gP q q O 9 l...mi r C > O.-•' .- L' V V " J O d N N U H L'u ✓ y u u✓N L L V u ` 'J � .l C V Y }✓ O L C✓ V p 4 W i•+u' K '] .- ...- a ✓ Lq, C L C ` 6 .C p " } r ' W L C.Sf L C N V\•V. V >r. q E L- G P <" F L u r n✓N V.^ G.A V N ri rJ . �' L'i •V-' O W✓' L .- ✓V." ud�✓ (- }N i � U n V 4`.Y N uL L�` N Y Y V�M O N L' O^ N 1 V L � n` V d L...1.. G' L v���.V. L am^.•~-~t �� O V.. �� S O �J o^u.N. D✓ u.- a o m c + u F �'-- yWl N C G L l .Sig S N` L n N... L C d W G r•-V � G r. ."' O 6 6JV 4U O.V V`IV N GV r > O rl 6V ur0i O 917, wi I i i q+ w } j�l n _ W � � N � � +• u �� l a• u d p p y —_✓r u _V q J f ^ yr I L y 4 u t O C�>J Jr r y L Q N O U N L p. C rn - L �A .aVi r n r'• G C yr 'a .0 •n •n V L A � ��f N U ; .r r ._e LLr u V d.1 n: �• +.V l P u �. i � a.Tl U Q P r'] M `J N u Y•u Cr t '�P ^J �i l O .w V •v i C 'F 9 (. O 1? u N V ud L rl W v V W "� rn G 1 C N N N V 7 « V Vr � y ��p .= u '!r U C ^ir�•` d O T N Cr >•.-r � U ar L N •n « '•. V G C C _T N _u rn r Cr u L C u ^J � nY n L•.t C W CO � >. ✓ "' C O V� 6` L y V V V p _V 2 u ^y rn N W V o q tVi bL N C [•r C V V v>i.� y ryir � 4y yr rrj V L u 279 _A y N it P N.� (" C VULLru rq� Lu OA uW L .r<.'.W !J O d.�'+r y ` Y= 'A 1. M LL o y A n N N u V V ✓ l O _ _V L � C •_ d ✓ OWV ACi N 3_4N O.� Lb_ � �'� y GN W �l A :1b O 4V p �� �L rr u4i y O W V L u V u u d L Ll rYr ✓ N 'j L > 4 _.r uVT} NL^ q Ou ry Cr L L r ^ o G `4 'r CrC � CqN N N Viy Lry rnN NN it yr 9WL L uL LU LP yV N •n q [Y.Lu uL' ^ w Vt ✓ anW Vru N�' •Un [V� Vu yr u� —... 4 OL n A V.-. '^n aiir N u+ L 4 L N f an cn Ll L t M u N ✓ O h( ` N o d W S. aLi• C V�ar m V« 'u O I N P aqi• L an I '� u �n � Vr Cr w C q q >q O L'^ O b u� L= C >r u � ~ V+L- u � ;q •n �PO quC uV OC dN` IW lu >1 `• W^ LA ^U 2 4 V V S O^ < u I W A — C V 4 L u � q 'V u L Vi V Va O' u arp '' W Y•n d � L N L O O .� � V/1 � 2 N J S•-. H✓ 4 n t l M •� aJ .:. L rV... W U /I I I 1 NI n PI ^! \I Or rn r S CJ an G > U AgML Y I ! J C f: q� t L u K � rL t V J•a S ^V y L •' � ^ L V P ` � •n « � q u VJTJ i ru '� G u y Car V4 VN p r� Z �rOW uA— yu 4 6 ra O N i w •O.r � `]W c µ J arl L L �Y w+.�. 4� O ar0 wTeri ✓ AL N � d VL u Wva 1Ll TL. ap 4uGj '^ nt _ tY• <`�-• WN N IW ^ Q < q ^ arCN y—✓^ p p� CM Pl V ap. r OV Vu ✓ OV � .K _OrOW G4 K uNL u an i_ CC+V U` J q ar u V W 4 — d ✓«_ aqr. y d C TJh Tti L4 _ you OV w �O L' NL CT C^ L. L nL L Wpu Pa•" �. C C •� P u>. r L H _O u u E an ay ^^ N <•� {L� W S `` 4 N 7t V O'O � u W rn V V C w 2 O O w � < > V u I l ty ✓ L u u y C A C V l L C rJ � t t. 6 V V = V V O V LLi u an < C O � i \ .� p O y^ A p `I u� J u nJ 4 l ✓ i�' L L✓ 2� 11T W ^ Wu m 4 / , � a:u nrar^^ 6 lN.. C N ✓VyV^J LV,iu V > J �. �^ tiV C pG ✓ NaLirO LT )" Vu ca mN ^ V2x -� 0•L 7 3" ^ u• l1 «p �^ LL ` i LlN N Oq LW n V•V ` lan G py •�f O ; — O u .i C .� r C l 1 G V i Y r L(L u« L V uO < L'C arVi rynL u�� U u �' U Or ! O U'•. APN Vr CJ C. CI ^\J u G n C VI S. N C r•�.^ � « V: M p �J 4qY � �! NL S � ��V�t uV t q PWy NWOAL O— Cb NO � L� VLu }�p0 V dt .ny NLG tui apr ��" � � � y�0 .•� i.N Orii� iv Ny.iu CVO t'L `G c`J Lti V'YN arq y ¢� 9 �' qN al'rO 4v_L 4`.� OLL G'L' V �r•��O V•� > .. ' rY L � V L � L u � 4 uA0 yw an` u'nV. u uPT (i3 ✓� yrK \ N?Yr �uu�'2 WfI« `' aLi� �L y�hNu �� u =N m^p.. i: b 2mN a_ _p• �l'.� �'� `� •"' rr<y ,p., 'Ym �'�-. ow .�'o a� n.� ✓� v.' •`ra` '� Q V✓ 4 4 V W S L O > L L = C (. Un j^ N p' O V. �.i Yr " V V u q L O.r. O .•• q� d ;. b ^ � P u� ` � ^ G U anL« 4an anO V+ tiV 4� • LVwV .fl 3 c •_ d N a, _ 4 Y r_ � /� r J L « V dy OUyL1 � Iq �L_ b C CL4 ^ «..G. rjr L�VW LG C' 'a NL n �� '•'/MD V UGC «GfyL �p Ib V� y t] yq �VOF OryNr yq�L b LJ a:JCCa � rOD LO V f.0 qL/ � �N V NN� m rOir NyG � � Ny LAI F�l CY.- i byD R y y W U Vb V Yr qr` Q J/ IL tJ 9Y2' N W « V ��u L ti NUy PC !fq�+ `♦JV D �V O rn-LrW V LL =r� N lu bl/1G'M O� s �. 1 � �Y- O ^q 6b ON•r T rL4-V Ali. ^ L ^ N •N r�1 V r C V.0•' 9... =V$ µ ^ N.L F d, AFL y O � ♦,.NO 4N C ul m u••boy c Vu a/ NL .c-oo ^ O ynV o b rri Yy-/ rr i L rlui %1 4yL 0 4 0y C O u ✓ O f. y0^ ry wr L+ lJ G_ d am ^rr V N N! �i N V L wr u u 4 L V d ~N O a O V q T♦)C �YVL N V rl 4 t...W OrNO V-• f1T ` • I. L Lr< r` `1 ^ w N r�,.r Nr wO/ NVI � 1G1 N • Or N� mL ^ V «9•�V L' li 4w. 0 Lv4u 4 ♦ � L� � 4M U� a�_' y V'+7) V a V C�V � � (Nj Vy� r W O 4 ti n t �1 4 I 1 I V V O b C ` Ll L L N♦: T ^ q N L...C.« V KgMN 44 •( 6 4J^.O e[.- rL [..G.. r � RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 81-05 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE ZONING FROM R-3 TO R-3/P.D. FOR 18.2 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 19TH STREET - APN 202-181-23, AND 24 WHEREAS, on the 26th day of June, 1981, an application was filed and accepted on the above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 14th day of October, 1981, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed zone in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; 2. The proposed zone change would not have significant Adolk impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and 3. That the proposed zone change is in conformance with the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this project will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on October 14, 1981. NOW, THEREFORE; BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 t3 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 14th day of October, 1981, Planned Development No. 81-05. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Planned Development No. 81-05. 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council . 4. All conditions of approval applicable to Tentative Tract No. 's 9369 and 11173 shall apply to this Planned Development. Resolution No. Page 2 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: _ Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of October, 198I., by the following vote- to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: K . I Ai ' CITY Or, RANCHO CUCLMONGA Gucnnroy STAFF REPORT Cd OCTOBER 14, 1981 v 1977 T0: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development BY. Arlene Troup, Assistant Planner a SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 80-3.0 ° TF 11734 - DLV - A change of zone from A-1 to R-3/PD for ,i a total planned residential development of 98 condominiums on 8.5 acres located at the northwest corner of Vineyard Avenue and Arrow Route - APN 207-211-28 i; ABSTRACT: The applicants have submitted development plans and a tract map for the above-described project, in order to gain consideration for approval by the Plannina Commission. The approval of this project will necessitate the approval of four integral parts of the project; a Nega- tive Declaration for the environmental assessment, the rezoning of the site from A-1 (Limited Agricultural ) zone, to R-3/PD (Multiple Family ;.: Residential/Planned Development) zone, the site and building design, and the tentative tract map. This project has been reviewed by both Design I and Growth Management Review Committees and has successfully passed the Residential Assessment System. A detailed Staff Report with related Resolutions and Conditions of Approval has been prepared for your review and consideration. BACKGROUND: The applicants, DIX, are requesting approval of their pro- posal, in order to develop 98 condominium units on 8.5 acres of land, located on the northwest corner of Vineyard Avenue and Arrow Route (Exhibits A, B, and C). This property is currently the site of a single family resi- dence, which will be removed prior to construction of the multiple-family ` project. There are seven mature Pine trees, one Palm, and three Eucalyptus trees presently on the site, along with some native Scrub vegetation. A portion of the Cucam nga Creek Drainage Channel runs along the western boundary of the project site. ":-.-re are three single-family residences on the south side of Arrow and one on the east side of Vineyard. There is a manufacturing 1' facility located on the southeast corner of Arrow and Vineyard. The balance of the surrounding area is either vacant or being used as orchard. A multi- family planned development project was approved at the last Commission meeting for the property adjacent to the north. ITEM 1 Staff Report i PD 81-10 (TT 11734) -2- October 14, 1981 ANALYSIS: The project is being developed in accordance with the State Sub ivd ision Nap Act, as well as the City's Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, and General Plan (Exhibits D & E). Attached two-story town- houses of 2-4 dwelling units per building have been proposed. The units are either 2 or 3 bedrooms and range from 1,392 to 1 ,497 sq. ft. in size. Each unit has an attached two-car garage. Twenty guest parking spaces are provided throughout the development. Terturized pedestrian crosswalks and curvilinear sidewalks have been provided in order to form a continuous pedestrian system. Recreation facilities include a pool , spa, recreation room, opei recreation area, and tot lot. Access to the development is provided via Arrow Route and Vineyard Avenue. The required right-of-way width for Arrow Route is 100 feet, and for Vine- yard, 88 feet. Full street improvements will be required along both Vineyard Avenue and Arrow Route, including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement and overlay, meandering sidewalks, driveway approach, street lights, and landscaped parkways. A lein agreement will be required for the future construction of a median island in Arrow Route. The east side of Vineyard Avenue and the south side of Arrow Route mill have to be widened to accommodate a left turn pocket in the center of the street. The interior roadway system is a double-looped system which meets the minimum design standards of the Zoning Ordinance, and will he maintained by the Homeowners' Association. The preliminary gradi�ig plan (Exhibit F) has been reviewed by the Grading Committee and has been given conceptual approval , conditional to acceptance of the water flowing onto the property from the north. The project site will drain south and west into the Cucamonga Channel . Storm drains will be provided at the northwest and southwest corners of the project to direct the water into the channel . A conceptual Landscape Plan has been submitted (Exhibit G), which indicates an abundance of landscaping is being provided throughout the project site. The Design Review Committee has reviewed this project and found it to be an appropriate style for the proposed site (Exhibit I & J). Detailan, colored renderings and a building materials sample board have been prepared and will be availaEle for your review at the Planning Commission meeting. Part I of the Initial Study, completed by the applicant, is attached for your review. The Study discusses various environmental factors relative to tni. project. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study and included it in the tentative tract file. No adverse impacts from the environment due to this development have been found. If the Commission concurs with this determination, recommendation of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. r Staff Report PD 81-10 (TT 11734) -3- October 14, 1981 CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in a 'iocai newspaper of general circulation as a public hearing item, and notices have been mailed to surrounding property owners within 300 feet. To date, no correspondence either for or against this project has been received. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to consider all matters relative to this project. If the Commission concurs with the findings of the Staff, adoption of the attached resolutions with Conditions of Approval would be appropriate. ReTectful)y submitted, J JACK LAM, AICF, Director Of Community Development JL:AT:cd Attachments: Exhibit A. - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit B - Project Summary Exhibit C - Site Utilization Map Exhibit D - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit E - Circulation Plan Exhibit F - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit G - Conceptual Landscaping Plan Exhibit !i - Illust ations of Wall Exhibit I. & J - Architectural Elevations Initial Study - Part I Resolutions with Conditions of Approval j; J a 1 � � 4 _ _ . Ivy -,, � , �l�'•. 1 l + 11 f.rv.•,•, -y__,� 1: �' � (� •. ,4Y Y"` V V� � ,'p.. �•'rr!�i�,J `r :i. I,. �'1 �.� .,,�-•H_..• I C '1.1 I��,��`.. 4 �J.1 1 AYµ--r :LL'iG`. �f � �� 1 T,_•_ ly�� � I I� ,y� � PA\•1/M1 n.—•� i J .....-._r...r.::.n ,,,.n,hc••5 4�.f.x.Ev.+.s4vo+•w-4cs V NORTH 1 CITZ' ()I' ITEM: Pb 8 -1U - 'b L V R-A C O CUC.\tI0\GC1 �nnn- PLL NNNG DIVISION' L•XI 11131T:_ __� �SCALE-- A, , I • Project Summary Sit*Charccturiat{ct ___. Spoctat Feeluret ___ 1xY W4 MN�MNN y1y\ryN - - ,�� 111./10/I. wn�rr.wr-N�wrrr NwwN.w.� /MrOM\xIM 0.1/\. Mxwwr+rywrNr�Wxrw.�rtirnw MI M1wNYM MIY IM YM\I 140.0 0 p. ""��'�^'+•""+ /wW ININwI 40 ..0110/. rrw w\.www�� IOIAOI FI. r ^"w�waiLw� M�x1/hNl\ •. IC.1100. �r..�Ir.\wr�Nw+w.+ry Nuw4 rwry wyx IfA"$1. wn�+N.ry.r•xw\wry IA00//, xr-. r.r wry rwti� nNxry MnYW.4tiw..�r�r�y-w NyN�y1 CNn IYNn LNn/ti Lxwer wwww. Mrwlwxr xlnr.riyn ' Unit OescrIp [cn _ YM 4 __•_r Mrw.1w\Y.� WIIII. IVIW Uw• nw.\•xNw.1w\.�. NNNi 1\lW W10 Y \r M��Iwxw INIII. M11M \nYW xwMxNY\N 10 IY\x[ Nrx1 ni { d: Cl �Y OF ITEM 1: I - L}L RA.CHC) CL,'C �l�'IO�(,Cl TITLE: PLANNING Di\`ISIO.I L'XI 11111T: pt fl I "I WAI fit Z'ClrA71Vf,- "AP rpAcr.-,,zj4 INOAZTH CITY OF ITEM: ;emLV RANCHO CUCANIONGA TITI.E.. M PLANNING MISION M 1113IT: C SCXLE: 1 1 unu ry1' 1 - i�--�1. ". . • as .�a {{..+r+ � r.l 1111 I 1L j1lt I 5�^-_ �• , �.l'�� •.,.�� ' -. .�� I yllr. r ij ' nNaw NIYLway —� —._—.--'— ----... c� • It NORTH CITY O1` v RANCHO CUCAiNIONGA TITLE- PLANNING DIVISION SCALE, _ Auk Legend 1111 ti.••° .«. ....... CY.W. \ AiI .,• IIA IiII • I emu e.n.. �It M i NORTH CITE' OF ITEM: Z - In AD- ILA I LV RANCHO CUC A IONGA, TITLE: S• ire- PLANNING DIVISION L\f IIBIT:_E—SG�._G: _ ,J AV Qcv � �� .-� r..., All.L)aTA 10HC'f.11 G•.:�{1.N(�/� —'•-•-+.+.�+,u-��. >,rrt•w.WnAyVntrtA�uar- NORTH RANCHO CUGV'L '10NC'7A TITLE Pnn�� ,o) �e�er i ` �Ad PLVNNI\G DIVIS10\' EXIIIBIT-- 'F _SCAL6= r'„•'^^ ''�- - '+ . A•_ �Si< � , 1� as ,�— _;ayr..�� rd+. Aft rrlr�e: — t eC OJ NORTH CITY OF ITEM: Z 16 - 1,� l_1/ RANCHO C,'G1.M0M vA TI7:.E !-��.�� ,�P t�tn�4,c��n� t`�►ro� PLANNING DIVISION 'XI 1113IT: em- SC U.E: _ '-1 ra vr; AM fill l`]''u-M '�I:C\{ �,,I.'c;liL��•� VLF 9 NORTH CITY OFRANCHO 1>>_-6 I tom/ r.. TITI_E: .Zjjus}rr�6 a; PLANNING Dl\'ISK .N EXI ""IT: art is Ealwlw�Inlalr Mabrbb I hi k6wvt QJ Flonl Elarallan m�ar�ef:,l t; d ��r.. I:Lr••.0 Uili II ' VL\.,,.�1 / I�i'.: I��{I� �Aiil ���i: I yy I� �� IiII011i Q Oor Elwallan Q Olaalbrallon V FORTH ® 1Z.1'N -10 C U(:AIN'IOIN(1 k TITLE { ` PLANNING DIVISIOV L'Xi 11131T= -T- � SCALE: JLJ rJ`p..r dav�lWn cc 61ES ENroUan ll 141. Q)MORI tbvotlon ©Old,lUwlion w.l. . ✓ V NORTH CITY OF ITEA1: R.1\CI.40 CL:Cc-VN1O\CJA Trrl.r: 1.,i,�,,,�, PLANNING UIVISIQ.\' SCXLE:� i CITY OF RANCHO CUCV4ONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $80.00 For all prcjects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee thrcugh the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Commmittee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a. Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Mulberry Place APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: American National Group, 405 South Beverly Drive, Beverly Hills, California. 90212 213/879-0900, Attn: Mr. Don VaVerka NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING 'PHIS PROJECT : Engineering Service Corporation, 4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 933, Marina del Rey, California 90291, 213/822-4040, Attn: Mr. Robert Sims, P.E. LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NJ . ) NW corner of Arrow Highway and Vineyard Avenue: Assessor's MIS 207, page 21, parcel 28 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM ?FOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERtAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PMXITS : _Approvals roquired are: tentative map and development package; grading, storm drain, sewer, water, and street plans; tract map recordation; construction and building permits all within and by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the County of. San Bernardino. PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: It is proposed to develop the aPyr xima elv 8.5t acre site into 98 two and three bcdrnom rnndam4nj,,. townhouse units along with recreational facilities to serve the residents of the sub- division. ACREAGE OF PROJECT AF.3A AND SQUARE FOOTAGE .OF EXISTING A14D PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: Site area is anproxi.matel.y 8.2± acres--proposed townhouse units will cover approximately 180.500t square feet . DESCRIBE THE. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANINLALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SUP-ROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ACIY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS) : The site is flat and Slopes to the south at an approximately 3% grade. There is an existing sir.,,;le family residence in the northeasterly corner of the property, however, this structure will be removed at the time the proposed_project is constructed. There is no vegetation on the and there are no animals presently or potentially foraging on the s The property does not contain any historical or cultural sites. Ther are no Oak or other significant trees on the subject property. ^ The property to the north of the site is vacant. Immediately westerly Is a concrete flood control. channel. Southerly of the site is an orchard and scattered single-family dwellings. To the east is also an orchard and one _single-family residence. Southeasterly of the propeLr1— is an existing factcry. Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series ' of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? The project as submitted represents the total ownership. There is no knowledge at the present time that an - further development is planned by others for lands adjacent to ;his site. Y^2 P7TLL TIUS PROJECT: Alk YES NO X 1 . Create a substantial change in ground contours? _ X 2. C:eate a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? Y. 3. Create a substantial change in demand f:,r municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, ctc_ )! X A. Create changes in the exi!>ting zoning or general plan designations? 5-- Remove any existing trees? How many? _ _X_ 6 . Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers a"nove : 3.) The d:velopment of cq new condominium units will create an increased demand ova the existing demand for municipal services for this parcel of land. HowpMer. ail the utility companies have been contacted and all the existing sup�lies and pipes are adequate to serve the proposed pF2 ect. _ 4.) This project ci1.1 coincide with the City's proposed General. Plan ensity or t is area, however, a zone change from the Listing A-1 zone to a planned residential zone will be required to conform to the General Plan. IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnishc above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may l,- required to be submitted before an adeauate evaulation can be made L_v the Development Review Committee. l Date ��.,_ ( - j ( Signatur Li6c—. Title )c 2w,,e- ' 7'-3 RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The follo%-Iing infornation should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accormcdate the proposed residential development. Nave of Developer and Tentative Tract No- ' Amer. Natl. Corp. #1-1734 Specific Location of. Project:__Northwest corner Vineyard h Arrow Iiwy. PHASE I PRASE 2 PHASE 3 PHA SE4 TOTAL 1. Number of single family units - �• Number of nultiale . family units: 21 _ 22 20 35 98 3. Date proposed to AWOL beeir. ccnst_uction: 1/1/82 3/1/82 6/1/82 9/1/82 4 4 . Earliest date of occ��mic_rc 6/1/82 Model and of Tentative S. Ded_ccMs Price Rance $97` ,950 B-3 (2BR.) $104,950 B-4 (3BR.) $104,950 ` _ . -� _ e RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONG,A PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 80-10 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE ZONING FROM A-1 TO R-3 FOR 8.5 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORT'iWEST CORNER OF VINEYARD AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE - APN 207-211-28 WHEREAS, on the 25th day of March, 1981, an application was filed and accepted on the above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 14th day of October, 1981, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: 1. That the subject properly is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed zone in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; 2. The proposed zone change would not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and 3. That the proposed zone change is in conformance with the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this project will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on October 14, 1981. NOW, THER2FORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 14th day of October, 1981, Planned Development No. 80-10. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Planned Development No. 80-10. 3. lhat a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning t.ox .ission shall be forwarded to the City Council . 4. All conditions of approval applicable to Tentative Tract No. 11734 shall apply to th;s Planned Development. Resolution No. Page 2 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Punning Comm—iss n I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly 'introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of October, 1981, by the following vote- to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 11734 WHEREAS, Tentative Tact Map No. 11734, hereinafter "Pap" submitted by DLV, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property s1titared in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a total planned development of 98 condo- minium units on 8.5 acres of land in the A-1 zone (R-3 pending), 'located at the northwest corner of Arrow Route and !vineyard Avenue, APN 207--211-28 into 4 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on October 14, 1981; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommendea approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho ® Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 11734 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) Tne design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injur! to humans and wildlife or their habitat- (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. Resolution No. Page 2 s (9) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration i3 issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 11734, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the ioilowing conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLAN41NG DIVISION 1. The actual placement of the buildings shall be in con- formance to the approved Architectural Site Plen, as shown on F-heet ; of 112. 2. A directory shall be provided near the entrance of the project to direct visitors to the appropriate units. ENGINEERING DIVISION 3. The developer shall widen the east side of Vineyard Avenue and the south, side of Arrow Highway to accommo- date a left turn pockei in the center of the street at the entrances to the project. 4. The proposed storm drai;i at the northwest corner of the project shrill be approved by the Flood Control District. APPROVED ANL Nt:Q ';ED THIS 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman i` 1 PTfEST• ,I Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commissi•m of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, .,nd adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plarning Commission held on the 14th day of October, 1981, by the following vote- to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: ;A''14ISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: l I .I !" � �p� 1 r � 'I(r `I t �� U 1 � � •j1 � � •' 1 ` 1 1 „1 I r � ._aattt ched r r • Irr 1 e Conditions �' I in your October 14, f •Planning 1 Planned Development (TT 11734) Item f `I �li I• CarolThank you 1.: 1 _r 7: 4 t � rI V O ^ /\ 1 r•• ^ FILL Y q m J^c wo C OKO 1N __ C W 7 T J t:I •-•L �U 3 ILI ILI u n > L .- „ C l 4 ^ r q ` •A b y L N b C { 6 .^ ^ � V fI •tl^ V d O ) V u U G V u t N T G d 4 C _ +' C n n uT A .^ uUN F! L <•G '� <*C c G)O . p N _ Y L u L -• C 4 r T V d O N C G I« SV r� < N VVtN G + r� CtG VV Lit_ 1,5 Y C Y•d R ~ L J L`{ ` ^! U V C h G O•N u u 1 N 1' i i i c +'o«.o w �_ •+ .o. :a o n I/LI 11.2 k r _ai i`- bc. v 6 nia o Aa OI_ �e nP �� i:u✓ u4 �m -C '- C C p {j d< N d �td v p f'� li ^•'• q ILI �] c•- c p c .- q c uri LL u-' p s ❑ ILI, •- C n U N C O 6 V'^ 'O O L' M 2 V 4 q O L� C O C >O ( � �f n C. L4 < III L rJ ��Lv+ NC CYPGN yL ••- 44 _ }4 A L� N YP p« o0 - u � V.i..._94 W ✓ lu nCC .70r CC r C k J N C« P� ud u•C Vr4r CV� A r mp u ^ i•p Tu•V Nt' 4 L' c W C d •^ N Y} fi< C J L' w O•' p r✓ � L� S'��u tl G f`_ -. ` Y O> N C V y d 'J d V V « L• ^ 4 u n a.ra -aa C <` L L 14 C+ U.i' •) oc.`. o i✓ NnCl ._ rcJ` y yI « n Y •«n b c N wILI, N F L vdi N of O M +Vn 1 ti{ V r' r V q L °' V S U c L• a. :1 C)•Lrr u cv cN •- `^ < w d e✓o � .- Nqt. o ✓c � u M o - - oa c o fL and > V w C T0. F O O N O•LL uuw r > _ � « If NL' rd J LO TJ Nyr N ` LNV rd `�� ✓ ` •U/V r� �I U.fr OC N N C L JY«gdd Lp u•�� .ry J: V K 4 N C 6 A N O C W-•• L I a• k t�1 Y. �]L F-d N I ."• E 4• {� c V L q G O ILI L,4 _+p f0 P O r•+ V 0 _ u � r 4 4 ^ (k• x aL c o d Yr n c`-. -L w u� `' _ L_ c• o cui Z OV uC FC N9 u «G _dP « COO• POL Jli LVr b r� L C L^ V f✓ ✓ rY r ILL C •^� C n N.y" r A N VG A.A. i.• \+ n[ C. u a V 7 ILIC N•l d J L- 7.r N J�a .• O C •C v f •..r C d O v NILI u O a J d > (JL y V G O {R� V A C C ✓C O C y y L u J C fi N_ a. W V � C�• Y N I= y y+ ' OC dam- V � � V 4 { �« U } • 4C 4 inL O O LL � «^ +• u z� f� do Odd � L _ � r r db N N o-o N ��- u r ao• _ > � n V � ✓ V P � N . C O O.N P fi V O V O O d «N O C O C �••^ b q + y O � Z � O O d M O - •"• j (+«.r A �q` N A r� - t .1 u A O •j pp � y d C� V f. �� 6 O L � � � O �L J N V Y J q 3 VC✓ �� ✓ O� � L al' q OIN yfLu r� C « -� , V + r .•• > A ^- L J W W q U J_ h r l- y A T O A q b W -` N V n � u0+a �C U a« O l d u b m 0 0 ' V ✓ `ICJ CCV .J uV Z � (� = LL.. �J Wq O NN}. (: A NV.` LG� V� Lu^ _ u u• t� t J I+ N „ Cf ffJ, C N Nu Vi br •^ U �` ([ p d^ N W •'t V � V O• �V« E C G N•U^ J C L V A � dt V w L« m T N J: •+^ O N V ^- (♦ C n�- yb� L r• .� 4 �V lNN > « _Y C w CL - G GV Ta V a- Yt•^ •- C' V V V aC V y` Or 4> «VA ¢ � V mO C< .�•- Y • C` r A L-- G •' N6 OPJ ^40 VV� OI q))� A .G LA- 06 -� � G� V _•rC 1' p ^ A ` y ty,J q 0. i• P T« � V U+ Y 4 O 4 J R w i L M O N ^l J V�IC'p� OrV g� •OL q 4�• h jl y V V N L N l u O 1r V •-• L t+M G > w V N.• O N� fL Ld Li > O Cq Lil �l ¢ .Or+ Fl N 2i .t«✓ 1^Q 1- 6�- S••- 6 r« 4 > 6 U r C V N • dI u • t N 6 J ti 6 V N ^I 1 � I 1 � T � 1 -I �I �I l 4 r � _ C W wWi ;I V � •I ✓� � �O L.P. O VO y Vc CN V III^ u Cr t:COV O O m C L N ✓ O ` w l I C - Jul i V Cr. i 71 • C 3 m N u ✓ - T L L A O V n _ N V. c- V ` V q l L t O q n L A C V M VL O R P a t� •F n m1 V u C " C V . C C [t C - ��• V N d L O P a O N + L V P O u m m � I j u C am . u u6 - .n .. ud 9 • �. � p` N _ G• c a. � 1 Lp L v W« V W u o f .O-•L W J •• y L._L .. Inc .O.c `. � � y Goer TTLu p � �� •.;:o r. t L.o u rn- �I>• V TiwiTin 4yA d N1 �� Vl 9 v rPN v«LL r uH � ., C. A L � oW tL � W x x ✓ + Nx� uR yLA Igaa L.N.. y.- o > Yn c0 Na^ .:9 i1 N Pam:• l �. ^� W Vn NOU N L L O rvu UOy i uCy V {`L^ T.w 1-G i_ Yi L T - C G P r '1 N iLL N T� O F.•_ O N u Cy L i1v L NI C G N✓ i .N _ _ `P cl r. _ .�� Y f_ ' .� y�op m u v is^ __ o�r_ N I- Y w ¢ ^ V,✓r ti 2 O !c m r .na �` 0 6 Ci .Oi. ¢O r i u i- u.n NI O G�J a.aOj�V.wil C O I � o W N c o c L w ` _ O C A S CIA T L A C u _ _V u C C u P C �L. L ✓O V u 9c G '.••y � w m Aop' « E' nLorxaL o� cL' A'fo =' cL: c :: v"� c V V7 4 N` uCV y0/ N }Uv a- C _._O _^ •• +Ci Lou G - S •9L° V O - =A W u.�. N N .�V� W p C i O N �v= + I L V t V N C C �� "L p V 1'V L C ,LI' V� O .Ce L o L P L`I r• b .YI P Y c imr A.-_ QmuCN L ^ V V� .n rG•u r� L C.u 4 d L 6 iL c P a ✓� o .� n o o N s P 9 W 1, c r n':J N c - u� - N O Cu L «V �uN ^N N .0 YC fVO NN t Y� VO [nC IP L qq rL V•..v i" Ou ..V LS CN U u y L� VO C qN LVN Ju6 duL _ � r CV - E F. V � `�V C O, _r Y� w ✓ V T � p CI d O l� � n L V L•e r C 'i O 4 _ A N T ` fS 9 9 V f q L- [•^O V✓ V C O L A 9C W q N U2 yNu9 Cu L 6pN VL �T `N^ Oy F'•' i� T �W .2.^' O V S L �P61r - PL CUN � W P.J9u �V LM . IJ C•� _ V r. •w C•0• III \= C y V C L O O ^^ G L L A .OiI N JJP� L N V c IC x qA « n n N.W. GLoaL `�y _•_c } Aecn E:_a _^ Nm i.«..^= .L. u�_ :. c.-. ;: �L y.r W✓ V A P NN [.= ^ g2_+ou Tom'- t�•I H W Q � n c uRN _ .N. �� �n °� n •=- V V „ .' « _u Y^ L 9 P t{u 0.9 q u.�•. N ti V A l N L i 4 O u w [�. W V N S _Y q r N LLJ9yO ^� I• Wru V.010 __ P O E.r ! _ _ G .' G' •>r V � L Y W u.y C UT.I IJu_ xCN VO^ Xd � U� ✓� Cj` C _YI q Ot TCC VL A uuLL q G TV O A JW L.4-' V�CT. _ 3.0 S A CI N N V C 4 S P A V C O O <^ �!C L V g A n q •,4` 6� Y L V m V C •'6 CIP� �_�4 O V G ✓7 OY q Ity qd .L.� V ^ «V uO Pu �uC AC OI L'r Nvt _L rMCY ` dUy� l C^^ ^✓ ^ a�t•l.� �r =. Vu 4 O L 6 C O h i v 24i L vl..O WdVPuuC NqV KNP 4O - c�L.� N6 � 41: �LG �. ti+ F •V {V� q C •/ p d ' CLl C •u ^ 1^� �� - y O D �C C. Or n'J N•^ u d C <' V_ q Y o• = fk/ N L •'. O J« n p P J Y= 4 = N G b N lO C � L � � \1 • I p I � O ' _ <, y W ,Wr. oJi ow-°• c' .W fn ..+y.•. oN.�i _ � � or_.M1. � �i �1 d Sq2 a P= <\bd n PiT �bT •¢Li'LO� ` V � O � L•w` C H u•+ V C D NW Y POON �D I/ CgwGl m nq yy4Ujy d HOC yYC V � t� L �dn» .Ta6' gC W UW Y � n w^ Ou `.pV ¢.•O+i l� Wq L_. u'L._ L,w cu OpC aL ¢•y, _ Wwv: yN^ ' .. NAY .G, y, :, � -" � �• L Fo � C N ..� V L L �'� L ^a u C N •n._ N w C [ `i✓V L=a 6a A � _ (J U �j 4 � P L L J Y y U p 4 + L u. ) N W u < O^ O `V W•• .Wir Y• L r' V O �bti N �J YW� � � �b V4u Y� C•r•..C. Nui V�« 0= 4 Of^ C � I � y VAY < L 4 p L•� O T N C V <J � T f C p p q W A l ,•L q •-•-V rn _ N p 1i y „ W^ J 1<^ O N - b G O •l V A O 4 a_, .r w L 1. N � ^ V u L N - t TMN � M1 D f) U NqC uN`nC1.0 LL - .r Du� lq Y. � D y > LO /: �qd RO Oil O • NdY V V CVV 'nW wAL.n EV l7 .•. IJ ._ 4 O _D W 4 4 O •- V C !I rn V. ^L W Y V L L V �L: i ♦ u � rl, u Ann k V _ as _W T � ba N } N e�� ��t r'e N.. Ay,A _ r•:.r � L ;a LLL`~c d ^l •=n'L^ L i r L s OI N u N V W o V U Vnj - N•L V tJL A L O Y C M T Y t I lygr '-i' W Y y O p C O .1 W NR N NbN 'Oy yV N6y•) _ 1: pd •» L "i n 1 ?V�� C` Lu 4'¢L J LVN CI�HJ Ab �(^�•WjJ PYO .K WLYiq W LI (rN G •Ilnti N J NV IW. up N dq �up u •n '�V N � ,r N+Vn Yq CVO Drt Op OY 1•r •l •- V D ^ C C •^D ud g i L L V N u G Lvr O•gir W V.� LL J^y A T m N i 0'd C\q 1- N n L T y `-' lu A ''. C'--'p? ,`)V Vu rn�0 E u-1 ` �pL .n L^- ONL •V. LV (RDL � U wN N 4 O VVN P� ql AVN N ? NY ti0 N¢Nr� Od T rN NOPO= C f' L Cp C Uu •• ni V ,�O ^D ^ q._ J •r O M1 G W C y L C V` ^•-• q L d -w + i .•O. .- V \ 6 <YL- m Y o AI •T¢� CN'.` ,Oi.n O n r�- Y Q Va O Y 6 V L p � Ll IL,\il 4.n o y VLi IO V � •Yen v L O <Ui �. 4 C.p •W N� J 1l V V L4 L. U.n � V• I V•r V Q Vr C q H J, w 6 .O D U p d 1 N y�. V u � O V i,v O O V i. N u �'J d •^O 6 O C N C V � a• � O .n � 6L� y2 - ..i O n N 'SV Y4c15 C (` L^ C U^ Y p C _ U• t0J b N V T L t�^C C V M1 V _ L } NYq Y du C4� NUY YfeO 5' a V 6 O.•.-- J ROr 2V N ` N Y LL LJVff�: YO ^ A�uW. N '¢ ��u V7 V'� ttJ _ ^ YLd.—_u� L •N. �Mbm W p Y �_ VV '' 614.DLq A_N d WSYL Y l � CWi GTw \a_� <P_ q.•L. E T y V7 �� C �� `� O W�uY��i•t< d u m �),^V I d N •n ^ L' 4 ,J y N ._G.QN. O Tu y Y � ` q S� �f! N w- q C �' _ CY�YpO uV Or TON W VAYI aL0 w � YY dYV. O V OO y •Yr• L.b •JC :•' � b V Ul0 NRC , q6 V � W uVV G ^` • LUW q � nn K V^ Y�»q'• q^ W q G V J 7 O' tI A. Sp WO^0r ¢r EN VN � qOC ULLp v»Y. JLW ,6^ b�r- c k J (,. 4TW�6VN qOq ._ 1uL' O_W.� V tJ` yYy CN LL dNL � (^w ><Y Up ;i, W._N ora.cr'c _o o•�r•• «goy u oqN �<a. Y� •2q u > •� � � Y � o ni D`m ,, �`u y N o..- w o w ._ a A P �, o •N" y .(t-.L.^ �c.W. u� �v.W. L+ t.. i v u � W ar ID}. s N q L' W, y q N nJ __ ^ > W N o e�wEW�WY� ca.e N?cW oYic Yam^ a« LLL a �m �Y„ c ylJ»• W D<Yce WL6»• _ -o.v G.-•�¢ �di�V � NL.L1r p fa ��� r 'n ^ v oc .., _ Nn �.. � `o � `o• c .WJ & i .�.�v LL.L+'O �N=yo =m��a. } � d.`. � L vv �<1 1•.• OC j Lti�u LJy<CnCN O SCN CO•- uO�L.LL DNDN V n0 � L UC ».� WC n1�� 00^Db AI L..."L Y.JpO C �VN bLLC NYnuC NyYV LL O ^ v LWuwV•y✓ C ' nY Tq O UN O C\ •p •r0 .r •� •-. �..p '` pN^ 2(�•/OYWV^ WL L NW — �OV DY� O,;NNV WV —^ w . ^� N [ .c..o o 1,'.. ^Y_ Ub�» W N w R�� W ^^qCY� VyQN NqA^4 CpgY'. N — L �� u• \� N GN C^I Oe,N �L N•W-V L V •,•-` N L __ • A <FC OL p L L • CO'. M1 6 y�_•^. N�„ O. C q _• Y u u N L�/L F u A— d Y d C •� W .. d •^• L w r T C pqA m Rom.-°ov�^4�1I i •O<`LJ.TV�c vpYfil`Ny>uLly'Luk COVVn b�.•,NTTqdV JDW t2qO rGNON WCi NNC Lv2NJ1 qwry Lq\�7 YCq 1 QOqUj YY •N¢»)'L^•iOd..r•wNW•• �yN t„y'r 46 uLLupll iy,FtiNO1 iuY u6oWr auVYW b_uo YwC4. qNN �rn_-1 OY� LtlCC-LYFYJ NL O Y } LM LI •CJ.J' �V-'��qLJ �_DuJ^•COEA'A . JVNW< ^JY d•-• d OWd_ V `. •_ ., L Y v 4 OA kSYU LD VL 1-._.r• J 1- N U I. C^V LN LGdWy LWVdL dr RN _ CG ._C NV � \ F�•1 yU -J N O 6 N.r LL O b L C !i V V tJ V U) G V � J 4 <� V W ti W� N P v1- fa )A 1 C — vNL u r v L fiN6 C up Ur O L L'V✓ V C NL V O ry C C ✓L V r J y r'T> O V L rJir q n'OR •f ^rVN C• l :•• N V1 V .. LC 4V r N V V LL P 7 JJ u b N a. N Tl y P PY O N N O � rn f• N N L m y f u m Cf C - _V fC f. r b ^ F �. N� t' . [ w• �:- ^ 4 A" N Ur L _ > N �W - V^ 4 rR •n y m � - �•••- i N O T C C r fJ •nq V Ur JJ f.V y C., �y C A -•- O L O L 4 C W « O V'V f_ l �)� t} W V ..� = l' J� � � �. _�aVJ V O [Y C r C P 2 `U � G >uV L l u 4 u N N V q r `+ W u N j r•n L.•j V _ r� � d LC_V u NV VJ q r• " F LOW f] u VV •V Y_ '�.. � vru nN9 CO � •2Wl Vy Gd G4 r- CNt � fiN Y4 N } V � U� •+_W L q J] r G Y N [V�V N L O V V L N q q O V� L V — q L \u � L a- N•i a O � u� � L 4 O Jl =tJ 6 rP_ rrir l L' J �l x V" uJ O N T•L LL n' I' W q f\ .O N � N 4' L N L Q^1 J U 6 L ^ W r W W V r�u N � N u {I N V fV� O J rn L f V •^b l r, ^ N VL �jN �, 3� •LO `up Or ; dVr �� Vo C U4 .'.� � N Lt VN O r.. N 4 g y w V 6 L N C u rn m M1 L l a`f' r L V O ��� '. C•u Y.� L' •M1 • C C V d G �N y rr- ^ fy_ N W — ,LL � u _ aJ .7 fT rT;r L `agirLN V nJ V 4 UY� fyL q0 f-•U\ Vi Vl� � � N t � N dUr`rN O rh Vr W 7C> mui yV O ; LYV Qu. f — ` C• ' �= hq CV YfJ V� `r.^W LL •U r-- L 4` L .- VV qN WL ur f'q_ r-.0 «` q.� P 4> - ♦ C UV/ C •V U. .W+ 4 W@ -�� V w b 4 N L G V �� Lr I N N J — d o W W W " .W. v w L �=� � -�� i•i�: `rr..n r c r;r � c v-c �v � m a4io �c T�+ L Y W •U pV b C W UC N q /Y' C rqr P O Y rL^ W d ? N r 4 ar T O L x f N r L•C L N f• Y u l^ < J p t.O O V.K J 41 l• o C V •I i YO. adr. C q L L d V SJi N N V•n •-� V Y � L N 4 c 4 c^ �r r� r. fJ L l V ar.y ` rd0 L4 L4 — 4 OrLW �~ ` •U �.�L WLV— VVV�r w c4 ^ CUV. y' Nan v � v' ca cv � oLR f V'•N a:qo .T,a�o � acN o � � .'!.r ��yN 7� � 4 yy C^ [ry 2s " ULL, FNT UW�C V �`TV 4W CV 4u��' l` i` ` N N J t �q W U• n Y F q l V 0 V 4�� V N� W V. r/r 0 u rdir i L' x w0 > C O G y y q [ w r V 3.} NxO oC N_bd q �J = NV C •CUOrrG VV .FJV id CurC Ca �: yO."• a O.CO L.-W^ GK�V C Vr rbyVV La b y0- C W G O u.. j` O 6 V d W } N V f+ l L L f T 0 i` -• V 1' ^C ♦. O d C a N �ur.Fir J t' r V C [^' Y 4 A VY, 'V., ♦9 �V uLLN x C /` O NCr'—�• i� urV C4 � 'r u• ^N' G C N C d V T Vr JJ qa. d>L •ntr V• l f'. cl [ C V 4uJ Y >O O C V V O L^ ^ N N N '.r , `' • ^ l C O V r V L + a- •'.�. ` L,t �. =^O .r. �� 6 V^ V 6 Nv .,Or k O I q r•Tmm tO.�ur s W VJ �^ ` � L _ C V pp r+l VOv f} Y Va P rY a� 0. C6N r.TirV Y ✓ � n— ,� • �•V Q q w N� �N kW. .L.q N 1 0, l � '] q 1> C V W N J N V 4 V V• w V t-g F i N .'. Y C. N r T r.r Qa W N L N ..-.G N• V l� V L r.-.W J R' .�. L W C C V �;:�VV 4q QO- WS � UVV 6L C• C �qu l•U Lq.V V3-.uN y l .N. V.0=nN •f W V 4« NI 7 0 V O 6 7 v VVO� ovJi .. I� Vwi OL .^ LV^ W dVV JV(C�C' 'GG V �" OVp q N Cuw C N ✓ �L� N� � u L u u N q u^.0 J Lp. L. Nye �+ L C4.LL y q V_S_Vp 1v CY J N 4 OI.L � �" N � VV p. wyd M C V V p Ju, C� LO q LTV✓ c p J d m Y c v c.`.^ 'g o n w o W s.. ..o•. N L'^ �`�� C4t] rl U f3u0 •LVu G NJ T_ .. � p L 4N Y `.V�. 4 C p n ��� 4�p0 oVu 4 ` NG 4c O cW u y O4 pu r N r PLl' 4 yL Y Ou�� ^may p' O uuCNl rJ�"O > Ip- mC y�Vl N ^ '^MVlwi NNVgV _ Y C �lrJr O O N N� QJOrV �� b <u � S UrC L i r V C pp g C O G2 ' MQLNru.. � •J LI (' Oil a: N �N C V (,w �mu gV'�VL GgpQ� L d IF .^ U V _ L• Y q .Oi. _ 4 yz n q _ 4 p � R d .^N L C c C • " V L VV-. N N Y L ••V L 7 4 N 4 � a 'J u C r � O rrOi u N ✓ d 6.-u LO ` u r1 q O G ^ W•[ ^_V f a` 2 � >. c q � � u�w- .r. i' :: aav Tun .•. wu cNy i'.ouur i�u c L ✓ N b �' �L NC (a Or •-6 G.+ W yr uO •• ..0. �'c V0 C4 N J L u l C ✓ Y 6 U U •'.rq. C W ruYi. ' N J n G A u �� q P'L n q� q u C ✓ V �^ $ ^ � O.i Cu V.� 14N4 N VO OV Ou.S; C l' L q C '>[Ln .-.I- O V'i C « W Z L 4 Cl r "� o n "L✓.Ni. o i-.^ u.n. y a u _�. ilc. •i In ARr W ' AO Vii Y p � �` � 4 bV C•ir (�.LiN q q ACT DLO.nI' M ^ � O u ... 0 •� q L« � dXt� V� N•VA 4 •• O I' r.� � .Y- C I'. l ya •N.r✓V•. � O i .lCG ' � q11 Lyu IvCIGO 9q .rOJ N^ O V a .rlUdn O y4 NW D X VP MUYr uVl a" C •� C Y C O_ Ii dC • .� d •T • d Y .' IC�Yu ` C yr y N V 9'O „N 2 ra P O L P O N Y ✓V d n C dl G N.•. V •,,.0 �.~r G LOO4Sr R dli q yt VAL V�OLOL 9G Ur ^ G RU NC 6 Vc 9 ypC V� _ SV6q i Lu dSV _ uCv Vq A .Li.v yi• rn VN ! NJ ...� .Rd � NY CSO.q 4r O W CLq p LVc �6 'VC IM L^ NN •^ n L ui✓ c o� .ter. t. iL• � o w it '^N�yoy' Ay 2 �< �� cy � i✓ N ` Po�v ° u• �T _cb _v. co dF uL C•• YuuV YC_ OLL LrO 4L V� '• 4V o �r G� flu IV T.n N p R� Nb Cb dw N L W� rrOi« 4C W✓ v.•i.•- `Y .Liru Nan ��� LC�A N� V � •i• Rq _ 4WC f. q � VX- .�n6 WCVY OA Q PN .n A O V V [" O V u a y g V b N V O V nr g V M Y q^ _ d.� •O- L 4 A C L V A C F T 4 N 2 O i L' 4 .� [l y u lq] n"u C L n ���: n -y � 1.V � •[�l i O V V Y q C ^ � n .� ,n q i O N W O."^ q Y u N ✓w � Ua ^ L r. > L .0 G r•V y •� VJIC LY ur [ip Nd a ~ M4 NY ✓O V 6� e Q W•' t 2 Y14 JMYg4L Yt-a NSu ru C� ILL VIi�w� Y •[ O 4 N N V N •Y N N N Ns N q C yr 00 O« � LC tUiY J c �u d V C •`• N «:. SW L A = «Y 1� N co c'v- = ill ..N O " C` '• �C C l r C }. P y q O" N � ` > u G RLr V G N `te a u J «P O qq 3 u qc c Nv p c NP Y'^ GI OL Via M1� '^ v o V Uq 40 �' aq O • u.V- L.•W.� rp `Id C '1 VN Y� q� N V� NG pT' �4 CO � b (IN qV • uy vY0 � aY Au � O O v ✓ P Oj � N I,i^ w, G u C u 6• q` W , ZS �C NC VA u p N� � O V ' C^ .�V V 1" 4 • y^ o G p 2^ ✓= .. n �U .biru> N.rCi o P Le �u Wv ✓ - P .✓ a �• .� f- W do q 4 So ^moo .�Y L�� oW� � T 4v "4' 0 ±r } T. Ct0 ^1 1q �u V O. ^ q V`6 [tN Vl,fj Y •+ V } � 1 ' > �� cu LUW ` > W✓c uu .c. [i YtO. i r. .Lir !.. BLS yV �L pprr 'J [C I f O q O V ^^ q 4 l R •� L �J W q V .] it ✓ ^ V q N 4 KO � O V Y C •-V •-. V ^ N rq.� V T U L C • ^ O O V O n•Oi f H � �' d� A« Yo v.:i L '4« .d..R ['pu Rou ( o Cry q� � •Lam t`^ q n O N ¢,• _ u0u p� C C 6 ^ T u0. P�d �N � n^ ✓ l V9••i• W C/ [l GN^ C CV i o NCLL m L rCLL 4 a rn n `° n .`..L°+ cet o-o �'i -•G• Lui Y.n. r..u. .^y U � 9 P A u M C P '�Y W C_l O � q _iW d L !I C C N u •. � �'� q ^ u d N V \ �. W 4 W� Gam` LV..C• NC u u �n V L NN N V•� q l_ N L n >. U C.V a lv y Ia r ^ i .n. 4 .� G."y W n •N i� q l I.p-V f ` n _ c L� .. o✓ nl r. v �L one �cr- �'- c• N a`r ... Yw � -� nN vr� ,L., _ [ N � o (i \• � « b m >. > oo d« L ✓ Oqy cu N+ pjo .n. U� y CC •%i•yi �' N ^ NY O: NJ IYYi HN YYN NO ^ CV .0 L' t0 [•.ai. VYy n1 YVV .. � L.T dd y R � > 6LL- Qvm 6uu L-V .LaO 40NN vLL.Orr tidy y � U � 10r Cl • • w G E L y N ^ I CU � ] ✓ G L ✓ l « G •'• VV� O � � V-V.v o � ` N L .'. •`- _ 1- .`r V o I �i +r 'f- a C✓ .N- O `r rq 4 _L L P L .n•� V rl "' L I L •J� •rl� . U L ��� f) .n i 6 L C «�i N L q N d � ✓ V _ Yr _i�. l Y r L V 0 ••tJ ✓ .J O V V O 'A u Y Cur N Y U 1' �: L A C`yl • -. vv ^F,: c _ � •-^ o .`. i W u ` -' t •' L-o ,�,. x L oY rY-' - ' y i.";wrl _- cvr oaq] o M c i. «v c c cr Lv W o ✓ILL W o � =rN. i � fAi o [Ni q C'✓q ✓..0 _O^♦ C L ,� Nu V• L Y �^ m Nn✓ U�^' 7LG Cn ^ 1 uM ._ �� ✓ l.. rT VC ^'p O ✓ C Nyl t' t]C ✓ L L G -�, L y V N u` IV 11 •YI � 4 � [3 V � Y, O� - - u � N :... q L s A L y F {3. G N A N y a u L.-✓ N 4 •] u 6 ✓ L' V O O G. L �t A q O N N L V O N fl r V t f �i•.L.c t � «LO t rLU ;N L 'Ir ✓� .J (', .0. � ^ Iqu V V nL✓r�Lv ` i.V•• Y .:N L •.V.L d L •1V1 G✓ ` Fr J O - �rrJ•� C lni✓i .r T O m C 'r O •'L _ [U ( w v✓ O .. U •r O O V C! iLi O ✓:i V L N._. w•i J ^ L- a P 1. L L _ 'l u 7 O y n N " y � t1•.O. 4 if N « V'•^U. J L G � N 4 i l L O L' iV^ u V C > �td Q• V.« VC... O yL V J 1 �Ca t/LLL u - y Aui .- V t1 -V V t:7 C d G• 4 O u r- - d W u J�7 L N L L u L N .L N IJ•� V L N✓�\ �� •^ L L u. V F O s •pI 4 G tit T 4 ...L N ^ O 4 N .] 'w N U V O.^ V•� 3i.2 tG ✓ O' L Y- ////���QQQQ�jjjj���� L y •� '•r u L • yr L w• ✓ ^q C •+ rL _^ I,L. c-d6 LP'•In CN ^ N CO O vNu OL� J L ��q yl t 4�Ut.VVm •r N _. � -N r u N •.O C L C]`� �� ` �.Y '^p '� V u LL V N � u T q Y r \V•..�] C' N G •r•y- C L^ •n.O O O ur ^.^ s V✓ O G n C C L t' r] C C^✓ O•W V « n 0 i V L✓ C✓ J_ n,� N L y l. y A O y V V t- F uJi Q4 .n✓... -LYp aLG,L Y-q � d y� v.r L'LiU Wt •JJ `CnrJTNU O C]4 GM 40 .- {✓ 1- +.tN vrV Cv.,VY V�^V6 W N G f_ _ r w^ L y .L 4 V L ✓C O 1 U. Y G O J ..q . .' L u u ` q n V L q t' nr L -n^`r N V V C ry n✓ ✓ n N rti [T V� V C� C. n ^ A t'V N N[ia L A iv is v.✓ qNd •' u�✓`sue �•-c �'� q._ o�r J <ry �•u N �L 00 Oyu •• � N C<_] a0 O _ N + x .^n aVa �uV �V•u r" x m y O L �'V Z ✓ C ✓N _ ^V� W V d V rn q s . 1.•.- N w' a y T O a ••Vir L']✓ {f V •f q u A N r N N f n a,p q L V L n�j` • �N+- y 4 Vl VC V^ VyO NL. � d�G4r- LLT ✓ X M VNG V• 04V ^ ;ur n✓ N VY in a `� o -u .d]` � _ t:✓u i` � cL .- ..cc uc -o`N "uL �= O L'u L L LC ���✓ ^ a « wq.� j� qN VN L YSrV -J .�4� vVl L v� .'+ L ^r � c q..- -�'`u N c•V.'n mL o_ �� ti d. « � C �• ^6 a� L NN �unl LN O••.Po LN L rt�CC ir"lr n" r]u r O �. N� LUV4 'r YVN -�.L NdY O✓ W `L Ar✓L_ C•�V 4F r EV �. u � Nd ✓ TL 6i N.-.VV � q VC LpV .� N 14 T0- CJL fy N u � d q N 4 q G n;N^ U✓ u ^n� Y u N q N L V u V_ v u 0 ^ll V� V t�y 9 V L �L l] L_ V.`TU ✓ O V V O u i.i f .^ O V A N d L t ,N V�✓ L ^ t'_V .J n q V niV �u VL O V V 2 L ✓ V P C r �� C 4 V•L W q�u N V G N U �.� �" V C•• b q G.V a N q N W L g O q L y O T N N O V• \' .J � - _ N `i.�r n L �• :!- a ✓Y V t. .w -O .-.G✓ lVi. f• I' Gr OL� l]L.� A� _ L 4 L G G u L 4 L. L a O O•� V l O`-L'•... V q O i-• • w ^ 7 l C 5 l 4 u n A V N ✓tr `q^ O u 6 L � C C ^ w ••� G M T ^i N V N C_ V w. '- M LL _ 4r .rJi t] tT.- l J 6 r �• ..u• V L N G O 4 \V� C N V N•J F n N t 4 N N✓n= 4� L t N V t' �1+] � N u. N N V y n_✓ N J` q c d y i uNiNl N .- •C' ..O.IN ^� �u N� N •G .:✓V G�wV ✓-.]N L (F: ~^ C. J• 4✓ cn -' •LV •4,'V .w •,L r- s O l) P N V H 2�l i t • N J t .n L q -✓ .LLr. L .y .N.✓�L Lr.ri r� q- \: « :. J cl qG• •no ..�.=oiNfN `m - •" '^-4. � N F L C• N C L u N t V 'Y N'u J « S < N •.. O W L U 'l_ v. S ].G u .� n V o `n•C C 6 y q V� J.. r n V N V O L V +f b y O V V e t ` Y. �� O �•�� i .� n' w N ^i` p L G 4 ^- L ]J •'J r « C !]w] C O q L L n.a-N Y' LO .^ �-•rn J _q :� V «Y- UM �` [ Y � _✓ L N 4 4 V V• •"r V n N w- N �1: ✓✓V C V fj C t .w L In .O- G L J Y •- L N 4^ K W. v ^ •- NLL RV b✓ NN[: 4✓ Er01: ` L O _ t � ^ ✓ O.r 4 4 C F• s•Or O C Lyi.^ `J s. •_ •• _ L -. ._V .. N N n _LL G l: `L. �1; O � •�L. W a V to u.0i 0 N b V N 4: N O Q O 4 C p.Lr• N 1� V L. <L O � � L m v � uI, 215 uN ✓ O >U 0... n .Oi� - .7 c � U �I � 1 ; � ¢ W L 'J •- c G 'M1 V .l. ✓ N V ~ L f � �I � 1 M -J I V V w VO 7Y Gl. ur L Nt Jla •O •. rn Y• LV I �a ✓ i tJC G C c C' f v �L u �wV. T LN. O C 'p V U w w W U ^C• O a ; r 1l 1 .n _ _ :, \ Ic+ _ ior. _ ..`I vm L� i _ �• r~^a r_-.nvt ac_ r �^ L : Wiry` ` A•' � ..c� Wv �'� o. u ^ 4 ,< •- ^ q V 4 ry P 4 V OJ C• rrr J U L S 1. rY L \I !> N L w✓ JJ lT� �rV u 'c- c P r'nn t', Y..aJ i!r � l V � �_ •r pl � � •Jn Lr.� J uV -_ •] � Ju V,� G C V4u I'rM C•-� � ¢i wv f .0 rn ._. � Vn, N u �L l V v R u V 1 V nJ� N N V � C V✓ � 'n O O V V L ? of C C +r V J J _ • �: '! � _^ ` n, G O N L�n J ¢7 N L L' •�ul L'. N �' u u Y N N v.a i T.a u' W •I V Y N '.'�l= C v C L V \G' O u". ^ N � 4 7r �V Y � Y _' G L I.' N J•y.O ✓ 4 N'u 1C' _✓ 9 N nt I 'J � N�� CO - c ` V-V LV.' O 4 V -[P N q� L O +_ Y w q u t, N }... U ^ L L V V N J r u C.u �I ✓ N r'n 2 w V c V U N d 5!.` W R• u a V tJ w a. T O _ u•y ._V - V n V y V w P¢ u N N N V fA L W I nJ 2:. .L U C f W ^'a L u G q L L a u d�u m V•-1' Y ¢ V .Y L ! W N d n W V N V l rail V .•. tV]., In W, 0 ur �..� C1 L. L ✓ C O w L Y L Y V Y _ -V t1 n ` N �✓ ¢ u •L r d O y A'Y 4 C� A u JJ JJ T O•u L r• _ 4 •- V .- i � p Y G t' fn L V •"r � N l' N N V V'- O N m. rU �. N 4 N - T Y or.JnN V +u +'VM lu ✓_J ` mil .�H^ OV _1NL 121 fa].J>J-, : .y N 4 V •' IyN Cc m_'. v.O OS CCr.-. L'- V Ii�•; nL CVIL •�.�N l' (' � u !. NL W _ _ .. O 6 u y C� ✓ N �. ..` V N 1: V _ r - � 4 L t> . O + ^ W „ C } y v1O✓ C L lJuy LL LLq�- u(rh O:.J nb VI vu � L P-- VLG C u V V ¢N .2 rCV i 4J v3i .L N � V V L N .. N I T•` � I I L V d m N N U O U • � \Ui q N (i 4 u N .0•J y I KI NI �� cLa Lq.. u•O .c. 5a nu✓ _ c y i G z C. oo tV. arror � so � r U ✓� _ '..u - A.'..`t r � P V V , T ti�lJ N L u.Y LL C •n '1 Cr C u v V ` n �i.� `. .� U �C F rVn V J �J V L W Y u' • O q nJV � + C� L' �V ✓`yq o i_+ c .na iic _ 1:.• -.+ L_ Nw�r �'�� ar NW,J :J.: —._ ^� tiu :O -`^ u WC W+ Tr ✓ VUN ¢tn.V� 41 tuba V+ C �•✓ \, ¢. L_- V+ L C_•H L+ -�. TP F w 4=..J A L't� T . 4 V Y f u 'r'• r r W li C A�� � 11* V� w 4.L. y _ !J "i l O 1- V V Y LC V A�• U LI {. V U LOV V_✓= YOu VOV ya� �• w � "ru V r yrNT�i OynILL - u � � 7.0 � N �J C u .�. - N ^ Cr u r N 3 J O N w W L1 2�r NON V L N •r n J C • - C ^ ��ff ¢� XNuyu �u CNnC O W ✓u bCJ W N O �NW O l + •O-- N 'J•l - 1' �.nV _y CUV ¢ uw C u ¢4 V S� C • W - LC•W` P v K V._. _ �N h d✓ L N O W q� Z p . ) l U' N w~ Y' A q l�f. NI C L w V V �� ' g F q u 4�✓ O V A l+ v p. _�'� } j O nJ w l'r C L v V LL Jt l iL ` � p� .� U J C _L '_• _. N T.. "• r N I V V Ir:V.V t- W V O y Cr r �' t.L L POP Y L u M y L.r V V V u u J tL N •�. •,`L c t L' rn �"� � �- :. - a cv�v o �o� � o.J_iY NorL� LL m�. .' L.✓r._ � nw�r CinA n. ]`. .:fib uv SCIo ^' - .. do4J �✓r.`c n � � [ v cr j �J u u W tl• � u L. O L' V J N .' l u ! V n V � • L Ur C V } `V �N y q..r• N W^ y L u • J ✓4 an VO ✓ w.:�� c.:.-y cV� SOn� O XCv PLL� iJOv � na� _�V J4V. (L(JJ✓ •� � � u�a V C U V�'�] N`�Y u J� C •,1 T:.J N V J � N✓ rn✓ m q� n } i ) \j it V. L� V[L L u N y C C L' IL u S V V N N O L fJ N [1 _-J � - .r U W✓? •` 'Y L' u V"" "• u V u- r V .. O UR^ r. c, Y n l` + OJ V. N V qua O� a Nu O � WN N �' ✓ gYjCC wN<V •� aiyL C4 7I VU aruM R,.�iil W._.YI _ <r.- 1 rN L un.� . ;> G : o I tJ^ rr• C^ u S r J' N 4; N > c >✓ V L'_ fi 4_ O V .`..T C N f f1 O.N j, n d . G J N N V G _ N N N ` w N .�C O 2 l L G�� N y�.V, - G C. w ` u'C^ Y .. � U .� .. ry T V •Vir w (� N r! V � � U La iT A A O V.r._ V i L I W > O u C C r�¢ A u l y, L .V.r lr d U 4_y`r N ✓ L f [' •• !I V✓ L7 J AG ) q✓ ON ✓ G n ¢ u�� Y. y -> W �v V « u .J L'M.r � ; ar uL G '.+ oov car`.r.°I rM1i' c noa �' IS S' L o '' oc' W c ✓ � Yt-Jis c _ !T � _ _� y� ' w rcl a....', o... �' M r'�' ii ¢ t,> .-. n�n .o.u.•. � .:'...a..� � � '• i t._ �n :, t-=' � ' a; � L c.� w >� J�`._ N .! L J V A D O` 6•-._ L, o p U C O y u � V n J' •C-G `✓r L`. JN .- + [TN aI a 1. +.�_ U' ¢N OY V.- 1U ONVr-. _ i`N YN .JV 40N 1.G✓� lTO tt'r � NCG' D V L ++ O H L r✓ � I-J O 4 4 O•O U t] ¢V V u u N G V C j V �� ty y u N � � V N t•1 � •N .p IY. 1 LL v j o N u A L -J � V I O _ u ,r T t•• �! ✓ rn n�r ,y � N ! V V� L V � � V � U -�p fi l C 9 - .n V L A ._ I �+ G t .. _ r � �• - �. I V.t: L t' n V � V V � � •�V V f N f ^ O J A N LL l n V' yr _I I -V W C�� I N �r ,_ S v 4 u C 4 C <'r l r'r �i ` 'r,Cr V..` W I vr'i--r J.. ✓ ` O T a ��'� ✓. c o I -' oc =.r_- � � I. r,;v .`. W I � Vt N y L•r � Cr V f_ C n � � ._u • L O y u u � LL L v N✓ �p 'u - ,r lw ,✓n rrr G J ::� :. _ tt y L N C T,Ir ^ 4 '-'�V •w.r L. y , �, N L u � A u L D r>V G 2 > LL V 4 u •W L N ( I 1 L y u �'•y u V V u O. n N l •., .O L _ L N r y _ r �✓ ^ V C VNu r-.0 vu 4� i ar u� 'f,� o.`.e c' o a �aR'. Ei �:° •.+r. - N i. i iv: J C - p.y rr•� `I V C j N L ,n } l NLL [ C Y 'J ! u N_ ..r _ Y _ N V r P A V'7 O YWL IW � wu , L Wu „ v T'n _ N1Y✓ N VI 1' ron •Wrr Oq0 C�V uW O� � y V '^ LL } NN C .'•-.V V wu LL• d 4. AC V.p4 .� V(' V WW lvveRnYLr ^ ^ ¢ fl •l L u I.r-. 1L-u Ll .L u S �f� ' } C • �I I V� � N � V � - uI r N J C 2� L Or .1UN•_ N r rr• q d .� ? W O V N V- pp)f w LL% L O LYl -F� 'n LLrlr C-urC P 5V•w1 L C� V^ T W � ✓ O V C Or A•.. L A C N w L l� L C _' �' •9� n d 4� p c n ✓ •C •^" 1 N L u.•. u I:.r .r n, m N O 0 rn L'r9 P,� ✓ 9 prlr ✓W Vu«u N VL �j u C.y C^ V. � +- W ` t•_ L 4 P l W rT^ N r_•-- • L y u ..� .. L .- �•. O i � d VFW 1,r6 -VL AL u 1-.� LAO �._ yr OL to y, y � P L ,Nj O✓ ut L 1 =Y N. C r_ (U w l� 4 N � V O � C T l i, L W N V 1 V ✓ W l Gr N W V n O N rL.• y u A Er L V ` J V V ✓ u V y o N J u- .:y w u Y y ti l '� u i •--. L O i �J,TC VV u '4 uNC GR � WrY CLi _iJ ��\� - ':¢•OiG � nl ✓VVVV ii � L im irm c•;^ �•' P -rLL,, Va: 13nO � Y :..'�. uc r '• .- � �oo._ n n I_ I`.<) / L V•�V- A l F G i V V r.u r V w Atr fN- u� L L - u V LL✓ T C O V u L'._=P ,a_. 1 N V C t L _ Nu« u�V aL1 Y ` dUP uFlV • n -L. WU nt VVr� fF u0 .v-, Sul l y q.� tr._ 1, rUN l•C^ Vr_ � ._ L' Nl 6r�« NF: ul Tr- � l - ct rLV✓u ,n L C fr rWn u � � N L n ti l y •.. ..- (1 N u n 4 V L- < O L 1 _ V- f u [^..1 Ott- L' u A d V^ ✓• N p N u P O T u y •a w. I � T n N L r N L i r_Lr L 1. y y l u ✓V V � J O. n N p � 'C�.U O W t'._ J V <.� • V u• i V. M my f\�� L W l N VV u u'Z' o ._... :,'.0 i NaN «n. `>'�"r 1� Y L._ •'¢ Sr "'.r y.. c _ �.L `.-I . L. = c . � ..'. du nn Cv lu o c L v L m �= n On: or° � cu� i✓✓ N 1: ✓�� m� N ._O 0... 6 V u S W L V 4✓ ¢ u I r( C 1 U 7 Il'f 7 I � 4 e. ✓ C V y C« i A I �NG y f V L C 4rN u U O V L ✓ _W •E '� V "' qa [M aci u i u ` q V U y � ✓. K L u L M Y.up cT$« qcV � IE oy `" o oa W is .•`.�.. bV CYO V a 4 .mow.. ., � 6T N` � l/'.L�•N V rn (l4 � O ." � •>� .� aJuu A N Ou 1 uOJ9 � 1•^u L � L It. V V � ✓N [l 00 ONn O.0 CN^Jp M O W— i [� 2I •Ci •• C .n LL L L F O l� C CVIQC L• T O q� `u� ` C J« q VO prn E/ O.UV �f �fCJ ..O_ L �I L '-�. Gt4iub M n.r oum .Vr. 0 � NVL D.✓'!tL✓ ATJu .'� V' .n L'y l' :•ter„ , .mm• 4 uPV � C ��+[I4 Ciw u�>b •..'. A +f O i.T. e:aV VpnJ7 A r � lJ Cna n-.�+ vJCUN ,nNtvi n ! uI �, L'U NV40 — 2T. VM LV LA ^!w GL _ tib� y._ 9 = Y V� m U r A L as,• .Oi .C_V ... q`� C 4 `V V i•.� Ew O•G R, qa. 6 A«A W6 �Ld p.�HQ !� JL [� `� 6II CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT �n a 1 O O z t}- Z DATE: October 14, 1981 v a 1977 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Nubbs, City Engineer BY: Shintu Bose, Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP NO. 4783 - SANCHEZ A subdivision of 10 acres of land into ? parcels in in the A-1 zone located oei the west, side of Turner, south of Base Line APN 208-061-03 INTRODUCTION: The applicant is requesting a division of 10 acres into 2 par- cels. There exists some dwelling units or. Parcel 1 , and the Commission has previously arproved the Tentative Tract Map o. 1 .610 for the ,ievelopir-cnt of Parcel 2 as a condominium project. Approval and recordation of subject parcel map is a required ccndition for the approval of the Tentative Tract 11610. A copy of the tract map is attached in the package for your review. The Staff is recommending that un offer of dedication of right-of-way be made for the extension of Teak Way along the westerly line of Parcel 1 with the requirement that the improvements be deferred until such time as Parcel 2 is developed. As the condominium project may become inaccessible from Turner Avenue during heavy stoma, the extension of Teak Way will provide the necessary second means of access to the project as well as to those dwellings on Parcel i . The a,�plicant, R.L.S. Associates, has sent us a letter, a copy of which is attached for your review, expressing his disagreement to the requirement of offer of dedication for Teak Way. _Tt is evident that the offer of dedication for Teak Way by the Parcel Map is require-' to ensure its improvement in the future for the orderly development of these parcels and all the surrounding undeveloped areas. The applicant is required to improve Turner Avenue adjacent to Parcel 1 prior to recordation of the map. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: Also attached for your review and consideration is Part I cf the Initial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist and has conducted a field investigation. Upon completion and reviwe of the Initial Study and field investigation, Staff folmd no significant adverse impacts on the environ- ment as a result of the proposed subdivision. i ITEM J STAFF REPORT Environmental Assessment and Parcel Map No. 4783 October 14, 1981 Paca 2 10 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the tentative map be approved, subject to the City Engineer's Report, and that a Negative Declaration be issued. A resolution is attached to provide for approval should the Commission concur. Respectfully submitted, LBH:SB:jaa Attachments CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY ENGINECR'S REPORT FILED BY: R.L.S. Associates, inc. TENTATIVE 14AP NO.PM 4783 LOCATION.- Nest side of Turner Avenue, approximately DATE FILED: 6/25i81 700 feet south of Base Line NUMBER OF LOTS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: South 1/2 of East- 1/2 of North- RECEIPT NUMBER: west of 1/4of Northwest 1/4 of Section 2, 11S, FEE- $17,1.00 R7N ZONE:_A=1 TENTATIVE MAP PREPARED B': J.M. WilsoP. GROSS ACREAGE: 10.0 ADDRESS: 387 N Second Avr.iue MINIMUM LOT AREA: Upland, CA 91783 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: RECORD OWNER(S) ADDRESS PHONF. ;: R.L.S. Associates 322 Saratoga Avenue 408/3!14-E571 Los Gatos, CA 95030 REPORT vC THE CITY ENGINEER Dedications 1 . Dedication by final map n.* all interior street rights-of-way and all necessary easem?nts as shown on the tentative map. k 2. Dedica`ion by final nap of the following missing rights-of-wty on the f)l?owing streets: 11 additional feet on Turner 30 fppt nff of dedicrtion on Teak W :iw y onaus to Parcel 1 additional feet on -S_ Corner P/L radius required or. Teak )lay an rceI dividing. line (offer of Other dor.icat)pn) 3. Rights of vehicular access shall be limited as follows: _ 4. Street vacation required for: 5. Master ?Ian of Streets revisicn required for: 6. The following perimeter intersections require realignment as follows:_. "' ' RCE 20 TENTATIVE MAP 1,10. Page 2 1W Improvements (Bonding is required prior to V Recording for see Item 45 ) Ea Building permit for see tem ) _ 7. Construct full street improvements (including curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, one drive approach per lot, parkway trees acid street lights) on all interior streets. X 8. Construct the following missing improvements on the following streets: *including landscaping and irrigation on meter CURB & A.C. SIDE- DRIVE STREET STREET MEDIAN STREET MAME GUTTER PVMT. WALK APPR_ TREES LIGHTS ISLAND* OTHER Turner Avenue X X X T X Y. X Teak Way X _ 9. Construct all storm drain and drainage structures as shown on the tentative map, or as required by the City Engineer. X 10. Provide all utility services to each lot including sanitary sewers, water, electric power, gas, telephone and cable television -conduit. All utilities are to be underground. X 11 . Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. _ 12. Install appropriate street name signs and traffic control signs with loca- tions ana types approved by the City Engineer. X 13. Developer is to provide all construction plans for drainage and street im- provements. Such plans shall meet approval of the City Engineer. X 14. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. _ 15. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall be decorative poles with underqround service. _ 16. The following existing streets being torn up by new services will require an A.C. overlay: _ _ 17. The following specific dimensions, i .e. , cul-de-sac radius, street section widths) are not approved: f r of dedi .ation alon west line of Parcel _ 18. The 1'0 otinng existing streets are substandard : y� They will require: Approvals and Fees 19. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CALTRANS/ San Bernardino County Flood Control District. X 20. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agen- cies involved. Approval of the final map will he subject to any requirements that may be received from them. RCE 20 TENTATIVE MAP NO. Page 3 _ 21 . Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: _ A. Caltrans, for: _ B. City: _ C. County Dust Abatement District: _ D. D. I.S. Trenching Permit if any trenches are over 5' deep:_ _ E. Cucamonga Cnunty Water District: F. Other: Map Control _ 22. If only a portion of this Map is recorded, adjustments shall be made to pro- vide for two-way traffic and parking on all affected streets. _ 23. The following lots appear to be substandard in either frontage, depth or area and should be corrected on the final map:_ x 24. All corner lots shall have a corner radius at the right-of-way line in accord- ance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga standards. 25. A Parcel Map shall be recorded prior to the first phase subdivision to prevent the creation of an unrecognized parcel located 26. The boundary of -the Tentative Map needs clarification as follows: _ 27. The border shall be shown to centerline of existing perimeter streets, or title explanation required. Parcel Map Waiver 28. Information submitted at the time of application is / is not sufficient fi� to support the issuance of a waiver of Parcel Map Certicate, according to requirements of the State Map Act and local ordinances. Flood Control (Bonding is required prior to ®(Recording for Parcel 1 ) ZKBuilding permit for Parcel ) �i_ 29. Proposed subdivision falls within those areas indicated as subject to flood- ing under the National Flood Insurance Program. This subdivisior will be subject to the provisions of that program and Ordinance No. 24. _ 30. A drainage channel and/or flood protection wall along the entire north pro- perty line may be requi-ed to divert sheet runoff to streets. Such flow may be required to go under sidewalks through culverts. �_ 31. If dater surface is above top of curb, 30" walls shall be required at the back of the sidewalk at all downstream curb returns . _ 32. Culverts required to be constructed across streets at following locations:_ Broad scale hydrologic studies willa require to assess impac o increased runoff. RCE 20 TENTATIVE MAP NO. Page 4 Miscellaneous W _ 35. Dust abatement will be made a condition of issuance of the grading permit for this project. 36. Noise impact on this project will be mitigated in accordance with the Planning Division report on subject property. _ 37 . This property is not within the present City Boundary and will require annexation. _L 38. All information required to be shown on the tentative map is not shown as re- quired: _ 39. Proper grading and erosion control ,including the preventation of sedimenta- tion or damage to offsite property shall be provided for as required. _ 40. A preliminary soils report will not be required for this site for the follow- ing reasons: A copy of the soils report furnished to the Building Division prior to grading will be furnished to the Engineering Division. _x 41 . The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga Covnty Water District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certificat;on is received in writing. X 42. The City Engineer shall make the determination, in accordance with Section 66436(C)(1) of the Subdivision Map Act, that division and development of the property will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity or public utility right-of-way or easement and the sign ture of any such public entity or public utility may be omitted from the fins map unless the City is notified in writing of any. objection to said determina- tion within the specified time limits of said Section. _x_ 43. At the time of Final Map submittal , the following shall be submitted: Traverse calculations (sheets) , copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and/ or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. _ 44. Development shall be limited to one drive approach per street. Multiple lots fronting on a single street shall use common drive approaches at lot lines. X 45. Bonding is required prior to recording for the street improvements on Turner Avenue contiguous to Parcel 1. Street improvements for Teak Way and for Turner Avenue contiguous to Parcel 2 shall be required at the time of development of Parcel 2, and shall be noticed on the map by an improved certificate. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LLOYD B. HUBBS CITY ENGINEER 0 r� By: RCE 20 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 4783 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 4783 LOCATED WEST OF TURNER AVENUE, SOUTH OF BASE LIME ROAD AND NORTH OF CHURCH STREET WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 4783, submitted by P..L.S Associates, Inc. and consisting of 2 parcels, located west of Turner Avenue, south of Base Line Road and north of Church Street, being a division of the nort'7east 1/4 of the northwest 1/4 of Section 2, T. 1 S. , Range 7, west San Bernardino Base and Meridian; and, WHEREAS, on June 25, 1981, a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above-described tentative map; and WHEREAS, on October 14, 1981, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above-described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with I:he proposed General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse environmental impacts and Negative Declaration is issued on October 14, 1981. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 4783 is approved subject to the conditions of the City Engineer's Report pertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • Resolution No. Page 2 BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I , JACK, LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of October, 1.981, by the following vote- to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: f: K.?y 1 v: : TENTATIVE MAP PARCEL MAP ` 47B3 NO.-'IMWT Ye 4 TI40' MOP.Twr"RVT 114 0 4007116N T, T,~Mam, 1 Y 01". W.MyL •1 WLYY 6. AO.R 'AP[Il MeI O 1. U" 6/ We MON4A IL[IIT t v (Ow11r4MY. M4.. oa IQ "W- 4 4 i4ra cwmTT or 6 Yy/I.M4L.bl.tl. .'.LME,6-"% a>tswr .u..: w.�•.YIIe.r .r. � e/lk/uc nae.l.ew46 Rslls Y[Oa.4ub R, 4euGMLL.CT.♦L '-" — J.M.\W hY�14e14 WYtIty 9.1 M. MVAr.lb ev 4 91L wr,ru. eVlw4 Uµ4rb�[MJfl 911aM V. 4YVn ceu(1MrM !Ic rJ- Y14•>Nf'lddL ,b{ Y L.w.l[a 49M1{'N4'W.mWTYc Plf. ..W.��w ,.1NY r0,^ a .':uN FIWmma ;—" N,P 1Y To Om mo"Wff 61t, - IM 001-.:MwgPao w:M0. Ir. - ... •(r w yl^WI•Uf yI1 l.I YIITT M,S' r."I P (W. uC44GIM11.bo"7( PAX Mo eu.4 T.tli P.LOYNT MYD2R YP pYel[4TA[ P/AIYNro ON �uWCYL G'IC♦IUO. PM, GWJIIY(.91OF WI.I.M+I2YIWcp e'M,M,IINMc[ rfh 9 Ns.M1u4LTryuM4loM[AunNJ McKsOWll JaYo,� At7 J d .41 ! J;8 I�_bab:�I[x,. Pipl�� a�' IJR'Jbo3' 11>A. �Il� I I I I INV r Zia i M (tMT. Y1bK1Vn1 i ( A �s'D goo ^�0.CL L 1 4 Y� U•' 1904 .' ^ .I 1 n� 1 Prr^) J �• r a � 4 � �1 r.Y• t l d(3 Y _1 O P4vcR[. y' * II � I �LrIRLT ' I 4! I /=,Y 1 r[• AML 1 1 I I I 1/1VL I ICP41 Onw.11r�V lit. a839, td. B. JyJ .( fey- fd+b I� A I ro� le. Imo` Lj ,o n o -- t a n , :. . J l �; Turner.. .._.. _A vcai:r TENTATPlE TRACT 11610 SITE PLAN �f. title• CITY OF RANCHO CJCAtti'tONGA16 ' I y ENGINEERING DIVISION u;� s VICINITY MAP 1977 a�;C i i .. v. ;11 Y OF ftr%NCHO CUCAMONGA September 21 , 1981 COMMUNITY DEVE. Opm(NT DEPT. AM PAS i 1SiSIi"u11i1121�121�}141SIG Mr. Lloyd Hubbs City Engineer - City or Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box. 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Parcel Map No- 4783 Dear Mr. Hubbs: As you are aware, tentative approval of Parcel Map No. 4783 has elapsed. We did not sign the improvement Agreement nor did we ask for an extension. Since then, we have achieved the tentative map approval of TT11610. r, I }r j The City's conditions as they were first required on P.M. 4783 are still i acceptable to us. It is my understanding that an additional condition, viz a 30 foot right of way, will now be added to the requirements for P.M. 4783- 1 am not in agreement with that condition. However, I would like to i proceed once again with the approval process for P-M. 4783 as requested I by J. M. Wilson, our Civil Engineer. You should be made aware that this parcel division has a higher priority for me than the development of TT11610. The land needs to be divided for proper ownership designation. Then, whatever additional requirements may be made for TT11610, will be the responsibility of each own r to provide. Thank you for your continuing assistance. Sincerely yours, Rolandd San L. Sanchez President RLS/jdd ti cc: J. M. Wilson, Civil Engineer Thomas Harris , AiA ' RLS Associates, Inc. • 322 Saratoga Avenue, Los Gatos, California 95030 • 408/354-6591 I' -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA c�Moy c i v r DATE: October 13, 1981 p o TO: Members of the Planning Commission U p 1977 FROM: Jack Lam, Direc'ttd) of Community Development SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 80-12 TT 11663 14ARLBOROUGH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - A total development of 393 townhouses on 40 acres in the R-2 zone, located on the east side of Archibald, on the south side of Church, west side of Ramona - APNI 1077-341-01 , 1077- 133-08 and 1077-631-03. BACKGROUND: The City Council , with the concurrence of Marlborough Development corporation, referred the Marlborough project back to the Planning Commission to consider alternative design modifications that concerned residents and Marlborough might develop. Further, the Coun- cil continued the zone change until October 21 , 1981 , to enable the Commission to review and act upon such alternatives prior to finalizing the zone change- Staff and the homeowners group met with representatives of Marlborough at numerous meetings to try and develop alternatives that could miti- gate the concerns of the neighborhood. The following summarizes the neighborhood concerns: 1 . The desire for the Ramona frontage to have as similar an ap- pearance as possible with the single-family scale across the street. 2. The desire for the major Ramona access road to be rerouted in such a way that less traffic will utilize Ramona to en- ter the project. 3. A reduction in the number of units especially in the area closest to the Ramona frontage. 4. Encourage the use of the Archibald access and further disuade traffic from utilizing Ramona. 5. Phase the project with construction occuring first along Ramona so that subsequent construction would have less of an effect on the existing neighborhood. 6. Provisions be made to assure the opportunity of school child- ren to have access through the project enroute to school . 7. Completion of all the street improvements along Ramona as part of the first phase. ' " ITEM K RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITION- ALLY APPROVING REVISED SITE PLAN FOR PLANNED DE- VELOPMENT NO. 80-12 (MARLBOROUGH DEVELOPMENT 1 CORPORATION/TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11663) WHEREAS, tte site plan for Planned Development No. 80-12 (Tentative Tract No. 11663) has been approved by the Planning Commission by Resolution No. 81-70; and WHEREAS, the City Council and Marlborough Development Corporation has agreed to refer the original submission back to the Planning Commission to consider alternative modifications that would help mitigate neighborhood concerns; and WHEREAS, City Staff, representatives of the neighborhood group, and Marlbo ough Development Corporation have met and discussed various design alternatives to do the same; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered all reports and evidence presented at the public hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes all the findings contained in Section I of Resolution No. 81-70. SECTION 2: The Planning Commission approves the modified site plan for Planned Development No. 80-12 (Tentative Tract No. 11663) a copy of which is attached hereto subject to all the following conditions: I. All conditions of Resolution No. 81-70 shall become conditions of Resolution+. No. C 2.. Marlborough Development Corporation shall work closely with the Central School District to provide the proper j route to sch 1 access through�!-lann De t1opmerrj:� V., No. 80- 3. All elevations an design of units along the Ramona frontage shall be as per the revised elevations submitted and attached hereto. 4. Parking as shown along the main roadway through th� pro3ect shall be completely eLiuinated:- 1'. 5. The tot lot areas and recreation and open space areas shall be redesi ed to provide better continuity. To provide suc ter continuit* ten additional units shall WA6 eted m the tell C4 s ti r >> October 13, 1981 Marlborough -.PD 80-12 (TT 11663) Page Two r As a result of the numerous meetings Marlborough has submitted for your review a revised plan. The prjec has been total-ezengizear. d- on the Ramona half. Marlborough proposes—t e-Efj�unetinn_nf..2A--ur.iS alvig..56 Ramona frontage and has deleted the major Ramona access road and rerouted the street up to Church, tFie`e-ftect being that tyre wil'I be no major entry to the project from Ramona. Any major access will be from Church and Archibald and because of the requirement of a traffic signal on the Archibald access, it will be more convenient for traffic to go on to Archibald than Ramona_ Furthermore, the design now re- flects a unit type that is more closely assoLiaLed with the sirsgle- < family residences on the other side of the street. IJIQ f ,r- 1le�x an _ �d six-plex uni of the on i�'nale-story design along kamonave '6eZ a eted a�r'eplace y a unique up ex um is results in a e �ge_appr'or.'irria�i-n9 tt�e single-family density across the street. Te`add fur er o�the ssi`njfe=fi FmiI y cFa- ra�ter, a number of driveways have been introduced into t�he pr_o e�ct.� These driveways are e n assoc�atFd with single family but yet are few enough that these would not significantly de- tract from fhe project nor cause any safety hazards. Please notice that the duplex units are laid out in such a way that accP _fr9ID qne of the units-rs'fFom Ramona w hi le-Tffe`-u-fFer one is from the project s ufi s long the Ramona frontage have floor plans designed ` in such a way that the main living areas are along Ramona. In other words, the units all "front" Ramona. The residents felt that, would not only give a greater measure of single-family character but also r promote a better sense of security. The -d._evelo^mac hat rt�ivr�� fhe number of units rb t were or�mally_ planned for the loner=.ter_m tur ,rr_nn-the-reterrt�irntl�if'the 7SP�pct. a eveloper has also agreed to provide access through the ._.projectas a rourp school and will coordinate this with the Central School District. Further, the developer has agreed to change the phasing of the project so that the Ramona frontage will be built prior to any other phases of the project. It must be understood, however, that the entire frontage units cannot be constructed all at once but 'hat the phasing will move up from the southern end to the northern end. The street improvements, however, will all be placed at the same time. The Design Review Committee met to review the site plan modifications that were made as a result of the discussions with surrounding residents. €! Upon review of the plan, the Committee recommended the following changes in the plan: 7;. 1 . Reduce the main roadway, with the median island, to 16 or 17-foot travel lanes. t;. 2. Eliminate parking on the main roadway that contains the median island. October 13, 1921 Fsarlboroigh -. PD 80-12 (TT 11663) Page Three qP 3_ Reduce the 3E-foot interior street to 26 feet and provide pockets of parallel parking where appropriate. 4. Alter the tot lot areas to provide better secured play areas and better continuity with other recreation areas and open space- In the Committee's opinion, this will necessitate the elimination of approximately ten (10) dwelling units. 5. Redesign the roof on garages facing Ramona, to eliminate the flat look. The developer has submitted a revised site plan in response to the Design Review Committee comments. The revised plan does not fully address the following items: ': . Parking is still shown along the main roadway. The DRC recommended complete elimination. i 2. The tot lot areas, recreation and open space areas have been redesigned to provide better continuity, and the additional ten units have been deleted. Staff and the Design Review Committee strongly recommends that these two items be incorporated in any Commission approval . SUMMARY: The total effect of the changes if adopted would be: 1 . Deletion of 30 units from the original plan. 2. Shifting of densities off of the Ramona frontage so that the frontage now approximates the density of the single- family homes across the street. Furthermore, units have been designed as much s possible to give the scale and cha- ratter of a single-famiiy neighborhood and all access has been rerouted to collectors other than Ramona. These major shifts have also resulted in other shifts internal to the project both described in this report and the plan itself. RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Planning Commission reconsider the original approval of the Marlborough project and approve modifications recommended by staff and the Design Review Committee. 'Taff has worked closely with the neighborhood representatives and feels these modifications would do a great deal to alleviate the concerns of the residents. New conditions and additions , stating modifications are attached for your consideration. If the Planning Commission concurs, these new conditions must be adopted and added to the Resolu ion of Approval . �! Re pet u y ubm'ttgd, •a Community Development Director °1' Attachment: Resolution of Approval RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 81-14 FOR CONTRACTORS STORAGE YARD LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORN7R OF KLUSMAN AND ESTACIA IN THE C-2 ZONE. WHEREAS, on the 11th day of September, 1981, a complete application was tiled by Cucamonga County Water District for review of the above- described project; and WHEREAS, on the 14th day of October, 1981, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission field a public hearing to consider the above-described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: l.. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, and the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed; and, 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. SECTION 2: That, this project will not create adverse impacts on the a environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on r October 14, 1981. s, SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 81-14 is approved sub ect to the following conditions and the attached standard conditions: PLANNING DIVISION ✓ �o` tuf ' ^ "`� 1. A four en (14) foot andscaped planter shall be provideu alon Klusman Avenue, the existing landscaping on the north tha_ex-irw +g in front of the Post Office bui ing. 4" r r ' r r Resolution No. Page 2 2. A six (6) foot high slump stone wall , to match the buildina, shall' be constructed along Kiusman and Estacia, behind the landscaped areas. 3. The landscaped planter, at the southwest corner of the old Post Office building, which contains eucalyptus trees, shall be incorporated into the street frontage lane- scaping. T � }azed-urr-the%,ertF� ride 4. The existing planting areas along Estacia shall be re- pianted where it has died. The irrigation system shall be in good operating condition and additional trees shall be planted along this frontage. -b,---f�tts��artdsta � 's'ci-vrg-ef--Frost-grc»nistg--sftrubs, shalll-.-be-planted along�-east peaty-14ne 6. Trash bins and receptacle areas shall not be placed along the east property line or street frontages. 7. Storage of equipment or material shall not be visable over the screen wails from the street frontages. 8. Storage of fuels shall be underground and in accordance with the requirements of the Foothill Fire Protection District. 9. The existing signs on the old Post Office building shall be removed. 10. The operation of equipment or repair operations shall be conducted no earlier than 7:00 a.m. nor later than 8:00 p.m. and in a manner that will not adversely affect surrounding residents. ENGINEERING DIVISION 11. All drive a es si min 30' wide. w� ,F 12. The #eve-drive approaches in the southeast curner of the property shall bedssngie�inve-apprva"'h &"G' �jp v --i rr wWttr �t w.a7ne 6, � 13. A lot line adjustment shall be done to eliminate the 30-foot wide substandard iot prior to issuance of any rL permit. e5L u S�i.ut� APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS LATH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1981.LQL PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �✓ i I Resolution No. Page 3 BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission 7\ 1, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the llanning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meetimi of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of October, 1981, by the following vote- to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: i i r RESOLUTION NO. 81-70 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT 14AP NO. 11663 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 11663, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Marlborough Development, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a subdivision for a total development of 413 townhouses on 40 acres in the R-2 zone, located on the east side of Archibald, on the south side of Church, west side of Ramona - APN 1077-133-08, and 1077-631-03 into 437 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing an on June 10, 1981 , and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at. the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings c in regard to Tentative Tract No. 11663 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent. with all applicable interim and proposed ti general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause ;A substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to C humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; ki (f) The design, of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. ti "r; Page 2 (9) T;iat this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 11663, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION: 1. Site and Landscape Plans shall be revised to provide an adequate landscape buffer along the westerly boundaries of the project adjacent to existing school and apartment complex. Such revisions shall be subject to approval by both the City Planner and the Foothill Fire District, prior to final map recordation. 2. A continuous looped pedestrian walkway shall be p 3vided a1Gn9 all interior boundaries of the project. 3. A minimum of six (6) permanent children play areas shall be incorporated into the design of the project. Three (3) of the areas shall be active areas with play equipment. Precise location of such facilities shall be subject to approval by the City Planner prior to final map recordation. t` 4. The temporary retention basin/play area shall be fenced with a 5' high wrought iron fencing, and its periphery shall be heavily landscaped. A lawn or other appropriate ground cover shall be installed and maintained within the fenced area. 5. The design and intensity of architectural detailing of all structures and patio walls shall be in substantial compliance with submitted elevations. 6. CUR' s for this project shall be subject to approval by the City Planner prior to recordation. Clear indication of five lanes shall be included. 7. All units along the southern most property line shall not exceed one-story in height. 8. Directories, identifying location of units and buildings shall be provided at key positions within the ueveiopment. ENGINEERING DIVISION 9. A soils and geological study regarding the effect of ground saturation due to the storm retention basin on the foundation of the existing adjacent house and any suggested mitigating measures shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to recordation of the map. :i. 1 Page 3 (� +I 10. An on-site and off-site drainage study for the project shall be provided to the City Engineer for review prior to recordation of the map. After review of the study, the City Engineer reserves the right to determine requirements of construction, reconstruction or alteration of on-site storm drainage system to his satisfaction. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS IOTH DAY OF JUNE, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC.N40NGA � (1 By: Richard Dahl , Chairma� ATTEST: — �C/""" '�'� �✓ Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretir;v of the Planning Commission of the City of ;rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resov,, A on was duly and regularly introdur:•d, passed, and adopted by the P6dnning Commission of i:he City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of June, 1981 by the following vote to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Sceranka, Rempel , King, Tolstoy, Dahl NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None m� a` Resolution No. Page 2 6. All construction phasing shall give priority to the Ramona Street frontage prior to other portions of the project. 7. Ramona Street improvements shall be done at the time the first increment of street improvements are started. 8. A traffic signal shall be installed at the Archibald entry to the rroject at the time this main road is constructed to intersect with Archibald Avenue. APPROVED AND ADOPTED T41S 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER. 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I , JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of October, 1981, by the following vote- to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: t .yy.