Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1982/01/13 - Agenda Packet
1 �1 II- 1 �•� r y i u" ✓ 7 1 t• i Y .I' A' 3 a t 11 '.Iryy f 1. "•:µ .. I I. 1 I -I f I f f I II 1 Iw } 11 i tl err eJ •. I ac tc 2 fD C7 n a r a � 3 c+ � I x Io -o ti 1 p 7 I � -+t0 W I C") N J M1 la Approved 5 -0 -0 Approved 3 -0 -2 Approved 5 -0-0 pproypc 5 -0-0 0719 RA NUiO CUCkIMONGA P•ANNI TI 'G COW M SiON AGENDA • WEDNESDAY JANUARY 13, 1982 LIQW S PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE,-RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA I. Pledge of Allegiance ii. Roll Call Commissioner Dahl Commissioner Kitig Commissioner Rempel III. Approval of Minutes Decer)ber 9, 1981 December 17, 1981 I.. Announcements I . 7:00 P.M. X Cormissiover Sceranka X X Commissioner Tolstoy X X V. Consent Calendar The following consent calendar items are e- -petted to be routine and non - controversial. Tney will be acted up= by the Commission at one time witbouc discaasioa. T.f anyone has concern over any item, then it sboald be removed for discus ion. A. TIME EXTENSIONS FOR THE FOLLOWING: TENTATIVE TRACTS:_ Tentative Tract 10046 Tentative Tract 10047 Tentative Tract 10349 Tentative Tract 10277 Tentative Traci: 10316 Tentative Tract 11606 Tpntative.Tract 11625 Tentative Tract 10035 tentative Tract 9441 Tentative Tract.11609 Items $ 8 C .` B. TIME.EXTERSIOHS FOR THE FOLLOWING PARCEL MAP: Parcel.Map 5126 11 ..,✓. .�.�. �.'•�Z.a �� i. � -Jl. f{.�.:a' :'! .ay. �. yW. ._ %K d Approved 3 -1 -0-: An roved 5 -0 -0 C. Planning Commission Agenda January 13, 1982 Page Two REVISION TO TENTATIVE TRACT 11605 - 161JBANK - d A change from a 65 unit condominium development of 66 lots to a 65 un't developrwnt on 70 lots located at the southwest corner of Base Line and Hellman. Vi. Public Hearings The foil --'dng items are public hearings in wb.ich car' cerned indivsdr -*Zs may voice their arkinion of the related project. 22u4a wait to be recogaizee by the Chairmen aid addresr. tae Coam:<<sion fmm the public _vicrop e by giving your name and address. All such op!ntcns shat be limited to 5 urinates per :-- d1vidua2 -'or oach project. y. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE 81 -01 - LAWLOR - A request for. a. change o zone from R- i- 20,000 and R -1 -14 acres to R -1- 30,000 for approximately 46 acres of land, generally locat ?d on the north side of .Almond, between Sapphire a-d Turquoise - APN 200 - 061 -12, 200 - 051 -06, and 1061- 172 -03. E., ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMIENT ABP: CONDITIONAL USE rtxrtj 81-173 - JASKA - ;ne oeveiopment or a cortrac- or's service yard including two.buildings totaling 12,:95 sq. ft. on 3.5 acres of land in the Ge!*ral Industrial /Rail Served category located at 9460 Lucas Ranch Road - APN 210- 013 -02. Removed will be rescheduled to F. Eh:1RONME4TAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MP 7280 - be concurrent with remainder of THE 9OBEn MAYER CO_ ?ORATION - A residential su r prcjer- . a�iv,son. of 2.3.1 nres into 2 lots located on the southeast corner of Arras Route and Turner Avenue - APN 290- 091 -5, 6. G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ENT ANC PARCEL.VAP 724 - THE Approved 5-0 -0 MESSENMP N - An i.ndustrial subdivision ofl 41.56 acres irto -i3 lots located en the south 'side of Foothill, east of Maple Place - APR 208= 151 -C&,, APRroved -0 -0 !:. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL'MAP 71 A P.. C. INDU STRIAL C 11111 = An; ,industrial sul . iv'sfon , o _43 acres into 2 lots,16cikeid at the sout%eastr= �:. corner..,,. Ntilliicen Aveiue. and 8th APN G,C9- 261 -47.. .. l}. `•I eYAV'V f 1i ii1 i ..r. one ....q•4,. L ...... .e r .. i. . r... } rL °¢eY'S Plannir% Commission Agenda January 'i3, 1982 - Page Three VII. Old Business A� roved 4- "t -v s+th provisiott I. APPEAL OF GRADINC,, COMMITTEE DECISION OK GRADb i'6 that final Gracing Pia.-. he L R f .UN ST ET Ju!ir' �m brought to Design Review for ASSOCIATES final approval. VIII_ New Business „ J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOohi'eNT REVIEW A��rovea S-O- h.. - DONAT - The deve' -,maec , of a total or , V00 sq.; ft. of office bui'' sings on 3.25 acres of la*.d in the C -2 zone, loca:-�d at the.soutP4G=t corner of Foothill Boulevard and Ramona Avenue.- APR 208- 301 -16 & 17. Approved 4-1 -0 with nwdifica- K. DESIGN REVIEW FOR PHASE I OF TEIITAiIVE TRACT 11,934 - tions and requirements VICTORIA — WILLIAM LYON COMPANY - The development singe fa ma y homes wtthRn the Victoria rlanned Community located north of Base Line Road, . psi: of Etiwanda Avenue, and south df Highland Avenue. IX. Council Referrals Ell Consensus that it be allowed M. Consensus that this be allo4•ed as CUP and that regulating or- dinance be drafted. N. , Approved meetings one per month -'starting 2 -1 -82 0. Approved 5 -0 -0 P_ Approved 5 -0 -0 Q. Approved 5 -0 -0 XI. Director's Reporyts L. REFERRAL OF GRADING AND WALL PLAN I M. REPORT ON VIDEO GAMES AND ARCADES N_ TERRA VISTA HEARING AND TOPIC SCHEDULE 0. FIVE -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM P. DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ON COMPREHENSIVE' STORM. DRAIN PLAN REVISION NO. 1 Q. MASTER PIAY OF DRAINAGE FOR VICTORIA DEVELOPMENT Public Commeni This is the time and place for the general gub2ir to. address the Commission. Items ti .be discussed be= are those which do not already appear on: tUs. agenda:.. „till .f j7i 1 { y d I '1 f.tY7 11 11 Yq �I L. ' •rte PlefiRing Cw1mission .• ••r. t Jaauary 13, 1982 Page d t. .. i. Adjournwent r Mn Regulations that set an 2.1-00 p.m. adjourtment time. X-f i ters go beyond that time, they shaj r commission- be beard j7i 1 { y d I '1 f.tY7 11 11 w 5 :V, Sir: ter W N i • J G i ¢t , /q i 3w usu3rr) 4 F u W 0 O " 6 Q Q l t ii W q G y l 3a i 3rhi a3153X,pa •,:1Tw o ire Q W W f . Y 3m M3/er11 IL 3 tl/ to ' 7!R Uav&4w N f �T p i d � 7 t 3flntiM Wl�f1i QTY OF RAI�IC,iiv =kMGNGA PLANNING t ^TNO S%0, %T AGENDA. WEDNESDAY JANUARY 13, 1982 LION'S PAIK COMMUNI'!Y CENTER 9161 BASE LINE,.RANC?1O CUCAMONGA, CALIFO_AIA I. PlecSe of Allegiance I L Roil Call II 7:00 P.M. Coarmissi ,3ner Dahl Cortmi_slorer Sceranka Commissioner King Commissioner Tolstoy Commissioner Rempel III_ Approval of :�inutes December 9, 1981 December 17, 1981 IV. Announcements — Po SK'PO t F eN` OV01f— � 1 l V. Consent e4lendar..�4t .:!be fo22owing consent calendar iic� be routine and 2*1:cg w112 be acted upon by the CoazdsSion at one time without dtSCUSSic*- if anyone has concern over any item, -Len it shmld be rem -ved for discussion. A. TIME EXTENSIONS FOR THE FIJLLOWIMC:?cKx'f. VE ±RACTS: Tentative Tract 10046 Tentative Tract 10047 Tentative Tract 10349 1w� 10277 Tentative Tract QTY OF RAI�IC,iiv =kMGNGA PLANNING t ^TNO S%0, %T AGENDA. WEDNESDAY JANUARY 13, 1982 LION'S PAIK COMMUNI'!Y CENTER 9161 BASE LINE,.RANC?1O CUCAMONGA, CALIFO_AIA I. PlecSe of Allegiance I L Roil Call II 7:00 P.M. Coarmissi ,3ner Dahl Cortmi_slorer Sceranka Commissioner King Commissioner Tolstoy Commissioner Rempel III_ Approval of :�inutes December 9, 1981 December 17, 1981 IV. Announcements — Po SK'PO t F eN` OV01f— � 1 l V. Consent e4lendar..�4t .:!be fo22owing consent calendar iic� be routine and 2*1:cg w112 be acted upon by the CoazdsSion at one time without dtSCUSSic*- if anyone has concern over any item, -Len it shmld be rem -ved for discussion. A. TIME EXTENSIONS FOR THE FIJLLOWIMC:?cKx'f. VE ±RACTS: Tentative Tract 10046 Tentative Tract 10047 Tentative Tract 10349 Tentative Tract 10277 Tentative Tract 10316 Tentative Tract 11606 -tentative Tract 1162 tentative Tract 10035 Tentative Tract 9441 Tentative Tract 11609 ; TTT.K EnENSIOKS FOR THE FOLLOWING PARCEL MAP: S.- Parcel htap 5126 �4 AM, Planning Conmuisslon ,Agenda January 13, 7382 Page Two b . t. arvrerno Tn - T'rWrTVC TQIlCT 11605 - NlbANK _ ��- A change from a 65 unit candc- ninium development of 66 lots to a 65 unit devei- .)pntnt on 70.lets located at :he southwest corner ov Base Line and Hellman. VI. Public Jearings <fft jL- The E. 2oainy items are pr:b21c hearings is whi.cb con - cerne - individuals flay voice their opinion of the re2at'.I_aroject. Please wait r- be recognized by the Chai an an-4 address the Coamis.;ion from the prb2ic micro 7hone i•u giving your _.ame and address. AI: such opin9 -ss sht 2 be limited to 5 minutes per individual fcr each project_ D. ENVIROWENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE 81 -01 - LAWL' P - A request fora change of zotre frrom R-i-20000 and R-1-14 acres to approximately 46 acres of land, Rgenerzlly located on the north side of Almond, between Sapphire and Turquoise - APX 200- 067-12, 200 - 051 -06, and 1061- 172 -03. E. G. --mil 01 -18 - JAJKA - me ctevelopment of a contractor's service yard including two buildings totaling 12,795 sq. ft. on 3.L-acres of land iz, the General Industrial /Rail Served category located at 94!:0 Lucas Ranch Road - APN 210 - 013 -."'- C1, v tnV1Y1'ICn 1Ii:. mJJCJJmt1Y I AMU YAKt -t1 MAr /Lt$V - THE ROBERT MAYER CORPUMMSION - A residential sib- division of ?3. 1 acres into 2 lots located on the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Turner Avenue - APN 290 - 091 -5, 6. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSFSSMFNT ANn FARM MAD 72AA _ THE 116J F,uGn LVnrnl,l - N1 1nauSLT1i11 SUWU1V151g0n OT 4 .56 acres into 13 lots located on the south side of Foothill, east of Maple Place - AM 208- 351 -03. H. ENVlRO!VMENTAL.ASSFSSMFNT AM PARrm map .�,v.- aRw- rS^LmL wrlrmni' - /1rl 1YIatLSLr7 a1 'SUDaT" ..1 o., .43 acres into 2 lo ts Iocated`at. the.sowtheas7 corner of Mi1lften Avenue and -8th Street'- 'APN 229- 261 -47. VII. Old Busia-.ss I. APP:AL - �p�M Gil >st�r: 71 ASSOCIr Planning Commission Agenda , January 13, 1,982 Page Three 4� VIII. New Sassiness J. ENVIR'M%'.`AL ASSEF.:MENT AND 01,11, LOPMr- -N7 REVIEW _ . y lam. 8� -'_s - DONAT - The develo>mrnt of a total: of � / ':.,; ft. of office buildings on 3.25 acres 1710 yY of land ,n the C -2 zone, located at the southwest corner cY foothill Boulevard and Rev, rna Avenue - APN 208- cU1-16 & 17. K. VICTORIA - WILLIAM LY'DN WMPANT - +ne oevesop —.i single inn y homes within the Victoria P1;;t -�d �ommurity located north of Base Line Road, k :t of ttiwanda Avenue, and south of Highland Avenue. IX. Council Rpferrals X. Director's Reports ?40tJ .^—'" M. REPORT ON VIDEO GAMES AND ARCADES K v� iWes! i�. TERRA VISTA NEARING Ahu TOPIC SCHEDULE FIVE -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGP.AM fpAU DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPAC REPORT ON :_OMPR'!ENSIVE STORM DRAL7 PEAK REVISION N0. 1 p"L� Xi. Q. MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE FOR VICTORIA DEVELOPMENT' Public Comments This is the time any place far the general ynb?ii: to address the con=i.ssion. .Items to be d =usxed: here are those which do not already appear on this agorod�. �5'a'�,iw' -..r9r j } {r, fir^ y •, ,, ,f } .+ «��,7r .ra ,�:,'`;i u"�i4 , i.. ,..., C.� .. ,5 ."�l -• -�a Planning Comnissior..agenda January 1s, 1982 Page Four ^at XII. Upcoming, Agenda XIII. Adjournrw:Fr. The Pl- xnning Co= ssion .has =dopeed Ai mivist ative Peg ations that set an II -00 p.m. adjournment tin If items go bf --Y=d that time, tkoy shall Z" heard manly with the consent of the Commission. rs O.` " 7 f% r� yv REQUEST TO ADDRESS PLANNING �Q����uSIGi� Date Name L ktiC—_ -Telephone : jtici Address : ! -` i ,r,% Sm Relationship to Agenda Them. . -x�-. •.� /�, e `zx� ;T,� wClSi��3�- CL, Summary of Comments A ?eox-- e-<-n man y1 -L CTd OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMCMSIC7 MINUTES Regular Meeting December 9, 1981 CALL TO ORDER Chairman Jeff King called the Regular City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission meeting, held at the Lion's Park Community ,:enter, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, to order at 7 p.m. He then led in the pledge of allegiance. ROLL CALL PAESE?NT: COMMISSIONERS: Richard Dahl *, Her --.an Rempel, Jeff Sceranka. Peter T_clsroy, Jetfrey Ring *Arrived. at 7:45 p.m. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None STAFF PRESENT: Edward Hopson, Assistant City Attorney; Curtis Johnston, Assistant Planner; Joan Kruse, Administrative Secretary; Jack Lam, Director of Comw=ity Development; Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil £r-&inee±; HichaeI Vairin, Senior Planner ML%TTES Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Sceranka, carried unanimously, to approve the November 10, 1981 Minutes. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Scerani-a, carried unanimously, to approve the November 25, 1981 Minutes. ANNOUNCE.MEN''TS Jack Lam, Director of Community Development announced that the Etiwanda Specific Plan Advisory Committee would meet on December 15 at the Etiwanda Intermediate School at 7 p.m. The topic to be discussed will be land use, which is a culmination of the issues discussed in past meetings. Mr. Lam urged the Commission and members of the community with an interest in this t� attend the meeting which, he said, would be instructive and informative. Mr. Lam advised that the Planning Commission will adjourn this meeting to December 17 at the Cucamonga Neighborhood Facility for a meeting to begin at 7 p.m. which would be an informal Terra Vista presentation by the Leo-is Company. I--. Lam advised there would not be a second Planning Commission meeting during the month of December. 11r. Lam .equested that Item C under the Consent Calendar, Revision of Conditioas for Tract No. 10277, be -withdrawn from this agenda and re- scheduled fcr a futr-,2 meeting. Be also asked that another item be added as Item I, to deal with a report on the issue of rezoning two tracts at - �rchibald and Hillside Avenues to R-2-?D. * * * * * CONSENT CALENDAR Motion: Moved by Sceranka, seceded by Hempel, carried to approve Items A and B of the Consent Calendar, and to remove Item C. AYES: COMMISSICIrn: SCERANKA, REMPEL, TOLSTO'i NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE. ABSENT: CO1- iLSSIOiQ m: DAHL L•BSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: RING - carried- A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVTLV NO. 81 -47 - MEANS - The development of a 14,000 aquare foot industrial building on 2.12 acres of land in the Gencral Industrial zone, located at 8613 Helms - APN 209•J21 -31. B. REVISION TO TRACT MAP 10762 - ACACIA - Located at the Louthw2st corner of Baker and Foothlli. A change from an 84 -unit condominium development of 2 lots to an 84 -unit townhouse development on lots. * K * * * (This item was withdrawn from this agenda.) C. REVISION CF CONDITIONS FOR TRACT 10277 - BAP.MARIAN WOLFF, AND ASSOCIATES - A 30 -unit single family subdivision located at the northeast corner of Almond and Carnelian requesting a change from public to private interior streets. PUBLIC HEARINGS Planning Commission Minutes -2- December 9, 1981 Uy� r� D. 11MIRONMENTAL ASSESSMExT AND pLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 81 -11 ('1T 11969) - KLR - A change of zone from R -3 (Multiple-Family Residential) to R -3 /PD CHuitiple- Family Residential /Planned Development) and the development of 67 townhouse /condominium units on 5.24 acres of land located on the north side of 19th St_eet, east of Hellman Avenue - APN 201- 232 -34 and. 54. Senior Planner, Micba,l Vairin, reviewed the staff report and stated that the applicant has requested postponement on this in order to re- desigr. the site to include a piece of adjacent property which has recently been acquired_ Mr. Vairin indicated that the public hearing should be opened in order to receive public comments and to provide comments to the applicant from the Planning Commission. Mr. Vairin indicated that this public hearing would not be continued to a specific date and would therefore be readvertised. Chairman King opened the public hearing. The applicaat indicated that he would rather not speak Et this time as he preferred to wait until the project is redesigned before making a presentation. Mr. Jim frost, Councilmember, addressed the Commission stating that he had particular concern with this project and the 155' : 300 strip that fronts onto 19th Street, relative to compatibility with future development both to the east and west. He asked that the Commission take this into consideration in their deliberations as it appeared that the density change would be considerable and would be forcing total overall density into that strip. Chairman Xing asked for a show of hands from those people in the audience who were interested in this project. Approximately six people raised their hands. Mr. Halsey Taylor, who stated he lives directly across from the Hellman Street entrance of this proposed project, asked if this was the beginning of a complete change in the neighborhood and whether this was an isolated development or the beginning of a trend. Mr. Vairin stated that the property to the west is planned for lower density but that this project and the corner is zoned R -3. Mr. Vairin indicated that the property to the west an north is of single family character and that Amethyst to the east will be higher density as this is the freeway corridor. He further stated that Hellman is the dividing line between single family and multiple family. There being no further comments, the public bearing was closed. Planning Commission Minutes -3- December 9, 1931 a, Commissioner Sceranka stated that there is always a question of compati- bility on any development adjacent to single family and is this case to the east is they are dealing with 4 -14 General plan designation and the property Planned at a higher density. He indicated that as he saw it, the biggest consideration here wo•i1d be density but people will question the impact on streets and services and what the project will look like. He indicated -at the major emphasis in this case when it came before Design Review, were the setbacks on. 19th Street and Hellman and they were talking ab+nt se•backs from the curb of approxi- mately SO feet. Another requirement, he stated, is 50 trees per acre in order to minimize the effect of having 2 -3 units together and that this requirement is higher than that of single family homes. He in- dicated that with the heavy landscaping, the negative effects of higher density in terms of noise and traffic would be mitigated and that they on Design Review were trying to make sure that the project would be an improvement to the quality, of the existing area_ Commissioner Tolstoy stated that when he first looked at this he felt this project was an innovative assemblage of parcels but that he had a couple of problems with it. He indicated that frontage on 19th Street was one because the existing neighborhood is single family and that the proposed density is a little high and is not compatible because of the depature from single family homes- He felt that this could be mitigated by a really good buffering system. Commissioner Tolstoy rtested that he felt the architecture was dissimilar in what is presently in the neighborhood and is a little startling for it. Commissioner King stated that he disagreed with Commissioner Tolstoy about the architecture and felt that this stated that in vie is a good project. Be Further er viewing the configuration of the site and location it appears that there is too much density and that the total pleating has to relate it to the site and existing neighborhood, Commissioner King asked if there were any further commoats and explained that this project would again be legally readverttse -d and residents would again be notified of the next h be able to comment. earing where they would again There being ie further comments, it was moved by Tolstov, seconded by the app canned unanimously, to continue this project as requested by the applicant and to readvertise Commission for hearing. this when it again comes before the Commissioner Sceranka stated that he would like direction from the Commission so that when this comes before Design Review he kn� neat their feelings are toward two story units, Planning Commission Minutes -4- December 9, 1981 Commissioner Tolstoy stated that it was his tersonal opinion that blue roofs will be incompatible with the neighborhood. He also felt that the innovative design was out of character for the area. Possibly, more conventional designs would be more compatible. Commissioner icing stated that he disagreed with Commissioner Tolstoy on the color. Mr. Lam state.! that because some residents vere reluctant to appear before the Commission, he wished them to know that they were welcome to come into the City offices to 'ook at files and to have any questions that they may have, answered. He indicated the importance of doing this before the project gets furtrer along sr, that staff would be able to communicate their feelings to the applicant. E. EmaRon-m -7TAL Assrssmm AND PLANNED DEVELOP,mm No. 81 -13 - (TT 121 USA PROPERTIES - A ehange of zone from B -1 (Single - Family Nezidenti to k- 3 /P.D. (Multiple- Family Residential /Planned Development) and the development of 128 condominiums on 9.2 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Archibald and Peron Boulevard - APN 209- 051-01. Curtis Johnston, Assistant Planner, reviewed the staff report. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if the wall to ',e Yar un along Archibald and Peron would be of a block wall and wrought iron combination. „ther, if berming .-old be provided on the exterior of the wall and whether, if he were coming up on Archibald, would be able to see any of the parking within the complex. Mr. Johnston replied that with the setbacks and broken wall, you would not be aware of the parking. Ms. Vairin stated that you may be able to see the parking coming in from the north to the south because of the street grade. Mr. Johnston stated that last Tuesday night a meting was held between the neighborhood residents and the developer and there was no opposition; however, there were comments on traffic, access to the adjacent school and the wall. The conclusion was that most of the residents were pleased with this project. Chairman King opened the public hearing. Mr. Mike Porto, representing the developer., addressed the Commission and stated that it was their hope to offer affordable h=-.sIAAI9 through this project. He indicated that Commissioner Tolstoy's comments relative to being able to see parked cars through the wall from the street would Planning Commission Minutes -5- December 9, 1981 be handled through Mr- Porto the extensive is aSlCed whether Conditi n<.'s carports along 4rch£bald was cthe r and be doing, stati aecessaia the resalut£o=n w8 04 the Project . they did n8 that the cars will ry. He explain hick relates to not have to provide be totall what the relo Y the; would rom vieG',wand, £f '4r, po cation since cl, these area that the other t Prefer not to. saePldrer �_� 3ga3d ng is ft tot He Indicated Condition 4 could utilize theproject and felt thatun"kely there that be deleted. ajjacent s any children would be chool _ °acillti He with =hat M`r- Vairia es. asked with tj,Ibilxplained that east tae reason for :elf ty of carport's roofs Condition 3 would en if the carports as your drive down serf's concern benefit the were as far own fr Project from the fronts om Archibald and Mr_ John DI a not being able to ges as Possible it the g'a -l. 8720 London vies' them from the street. Proposed project and Street, stet He stated a cone felt the ed that he lives whetter dr£vewa,— with the Sidewalks ad would benefit Le in back of be :'alkir. would be Sidewalks adjacent to the neighborhood, visible. E L° school, ge as to alert drly Project and wall's and ask_ tied thet rbe.n ,,Chat crosswal7�,e'aad children who would Ind 7:5$ P.M., �+ how this might behmit gate a problemewithigns be i on Co�issfoner Mr. Nacho Dahl a_ gated. developer Cracia 10364 Euboldt, stated that Several any discussloa of with residents and Years ago h be heavy laadscap instead. had develc er had indite `here hat �t been Xr- P cared that there wood Place to rePZi that he could Covington past not respond on *hat 8toa Group, as they had recently Purchased had previously Mr. Pav Trujillo, thL project from the rePre�enting the Cu that he concu He further stated th, L the 8rafittl�prob nngatSch � �ect� s ool with the associ he was concerned that th fated sociclogi� i�licationsthe density, offth£he area. :here being no f Project further comments, the Public hearing was closed. Of Commissioner Sceraaka asked if staff p9 vines aloes sed. E the wall. intended Mr. Vai:1a replied t° recommend the Planting could be added to LhLIe�aL LZe condition could condition,, is generalized and be all wrought 1r Review Committee pprovalut that this also Dicated that the fence • s .� subjected the Design Planning Commission Minutes December 9, 1981 Mr. Sceran'.ca askeu the applicant what the purpose of the wall is. Mr. Porto replied that it is intended to create a sense of cov=,nity and provide security in giving the people a feeling that they belong in that area. He also indicated that he would not have a problem in planting vines to cover the walls. Commissioner Sceranka stated that he empathized with those people who think that grafitti is a problem and felt that the applicant shouldn't say that he hoped that what they are proposing will eliminate it but that he should be more positive in finding a better way of eliminating it. He indicated that the wrought iron for particular vistas into the project might not be aesthetically appealing because people don't want to look into carports. He felt that berming should reduce the impact of the wall and the landscaping would also help. He strongly emphasized that he did not wish to see the landscaping trimmed up but that it should remain heavy and close to the ground to obscure the view of the wall. Commissioner Rempel stated that relative to the concern on crosswalks, since this is going to have a meandering sidewalk treatment, the sidewalks will continue across the driveways and perhaps a different material to delineate the crosswalk would alert motorists. He stated that he agreed with Commissioner Sceranka's comments on the carports and wall and did not feel that the wall should be more than one -foot or so above the berming. Commissioner Rempel stated that the roofs of the carports instead of having gray rock or slag on them should have a requirement for some type of brown granular material or spray so that earthtones are picked up and the carports are not really visible or out of place. Commissioner Rempel stated that he liked this project overall and felt it would improve t'-e area. Further, as far as density was concerned, most of the project contained one bedroom units which would not have a heavy impact. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that Mr. Porto had commented on tot lots. Mr. Porto replied that 50 percent of this project will be one bedroom units, with th,4t other half two bedroom, two ba-h units which would be more geared tc single people or couples without ;hildren. He stated that his firm would not like to provide the tot _ -.s unless they bad to, since the school yard %ras close by and was available for play. Commissioner Yolstoy stated that he had a comment to that. He indicated that he liked the project overall and that it is good, had some concern about density, but that this is the only way to get affordable housing. He indicated that some units will be as low as $52,000 and the City needs to allow that kind of density. Planning Commission Miuutes -7- December 5, 1981 Commissioner Tolstoy stated that because of today's high cost of housing, lifestyles are going to change and he felt that tot lots must be provided even for one bedroom condos. Commissioner Rempel stated that he agreed with Commissioner Tolstoy wholeheartedly. He felt that this project will get a lot of small children and the age of the children will be such that they will mot utilize the school yard and would therefore need play areas nearby. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he bad one other remark which he addressed to Desiga Review. He asked that they pay particuL:r attention to not having a used car lot approach in front of buildings and in- dicated that the X-1-Tart on Haven was a fine example of how to overcome this. He felt that other attempts could also be made to further solve the problem and asked that they be sensitive to this issue. Commissioner Dahl stated that tot lots should be included in this project. Further that the fencing between the wrought iron should be used. Commissioner Dahl stated that there is a new material on the market which is anti- grafitti which should be considered for use on this project and asked the applicant to work with the Engineering Department on this. Commissioner Dahl stated that be is always uneasy about a project that is surrounded by single family residences but that he could not to against this project because of a personal Feeling that he has. He complimented the Design Review Committee c•o a good job. Chairman Ring stated that he felt the project to be excellently designed but had a problem with P'.r. Trujillo's comments and s.oul.d like to give more thought to what he said. Commissioner Sceranka stated that a tot lot is specifically for those people who can't take their children to a school facility and it would be easier if the tot lot were located within the complex. Further, in terms of density, this is not high density, it is medium, and the development of these units on Archibald emphasizes the General Plan and places the traffic where it should be. Yr. Dairin stated that on the ise-se of visibility of carports, the Design Review Committee would benefit from any direction that the Planning Commission could provide especially relative to the loop sy:•tem concept. He asked if the Commission had anything that they would like to add. Co=issioner Tolstoy stated that he had no problem with parking as it is now conceptualized as long as there is screening from the street. Commissioner Tolstoy further stated that when loops are designed and it works, it is very good, but hoped that not every project would have deign mops and conversely, that you would not see a sea of cars. Planning Commission Minutes -8- December 9, 1981 Motion: Moved by Sceranka, seconded by Tolstoy, canted, to adopt Resolution No. 81 -145 conditionally approving Tentative Tract No. 12090 with the additional conditions ehax a directory be placed at the entrance of the project; most of the wall be planted with vine material, walkways be clearly visible from the street so that children will be protected; the roofs be of an environmental color; carports be blocked from view from the street as much as possible; removal of Condition No. 3 from section 2 and the retaining of Condition No. 4; the applicant look into graffiti removal material for walls and the cost with a decision on applicability left to the Engineering Depart- ment; and that there be only one to two feet of wall visible above the berms with the remainder of the wall of wrought iron. Mr. Hopson stated that the Commission should also consider a condition that CC&R's require that the homeowners bear responsibility for the maintenance and upkeep of the walls and removal of graffiti if necessary. There was concurrence of the Commission that this be done. 8:10 p.m. The Planning Commission recessed. 8:27 p.m. The Planning Commission reconv %ned. F. APPyAL OF GRADING SUNSTONE ST3EET - Senior Planner, Michael Vairin, reviewed the staff report and also showed slides of the subject property. He spoke a£ the denial of this gr:..ding project by the Grading Comm. ?ttec and indicatea the t a precedent might be set if this project w`<e to gain approval. Mr. :.ohm D. Pose, Brea, for Z a owner of this property, explained why the grading for this p-. .e was planned in the manner presented. He indicated that this plan dould neither export nor import dirt and was not any different than .:he house next door to the east of this property. He indicated that perhaps they are the first ones to be reviewed and that this is a good solution to the grading on this lot. Chairman King asked if the only reason Mr. Rose had in this grading plan was to create a level pad or if there were other reasons. Y,r. Rose replied that a leach line has been established which tney do not think to be unreasonable and that the vier from the street will be prominent and good looking. He felt that 5e slides that were zbown did not portray the view to its best advantage. Planning Commission Minutes Em December 9, 1981 Chairman King asked if there was any other way to obtain a level pad without doing what was being suggested by Mr. Rose. Mr. Rose replied that by lowering the pad, it would make the land around the swimming pool unusable and the owner of this property has two children and needed the space for their use and also for entertainment. He in- dicated that the design he proposes uses the land optimally and stated that maintenance would be good. He also spoke of the cross lot drainage and how it would be to the surrounding neighbor's advantage to have this design. Chairman King asked staff if there are problems In what the applicant is proposing and what other methods there are to obtain the objectives they want accomplished. Mr. Vairin explained and provided examples of lowering the pad and using a split level in construction of the house, indicating that some dirt would need to be imported. Further, be indicated that the Building Official did most of the work on the preliminary plan and it was not as though Mr. Rose had submitted this for plan check but was well .aware of the problea. Re felt that suggestions that were made would retain the character of the area while allowing reasonable use of the property. In fact, the proposed grading is the simplest and less expensive solution. Commissioner Sceranka asked if Mr. Vairin felt there was a way he could have a level pad on the property and still meet the grading standards. Mr. Vairin replied yes, through the use of retaining walls. Commissioner Sceranka stated that it appeared to him that the pi --r at owner designed the site himself and went through considerable expeLse and does not want to change his design. Mr. Rose replied that it isn't quite as cut and dried as this. Commissioner Sceranka read a part of Ordinance No. 118 and asked Mr. Rose if he thought the slopes to be excessive. Mr. Rose replied that he did not feel the grading to be excessive as they are 2 x 1 and not 1; x 1 and their intent is to keep the slope as natural as possible. Mr. Vairin stated that this is the first time the Grading Committee has encountered a front lot situation a-ld it was therefore critical tonight in terms of review of front lot slopes that a decision be made for future evaluations. Commissioner Sceranka asked what was objectionable about this plan. Planning Commission Minutes -10- December. 9, 1981 Mr. Vairin replied that the 14 -foot grade required here; whereas, the maximum has been 8 feet. He indicated that a maxiu,,= number of feet for slopes has never been established. Commissioner Hempel stated that what would be objectirable would be excessive grading like the Lewis tract on Archibald but that this lot is not a natural lot and has been previously graded. He indicated that he would not have any objection to bringing it into a more natu U situation and felt that the concept of a split level hose has merit but would destroy any back yard on the site. Chairman King stated nat assuming that the applicant's wishes sre granted, what would this grading do if the property to the north wants a southerly view. Mr. Vairin stated he did not know if he could answer accurately but did not think it would cause a problem. Commissioner Dahl stated that the homes on the south street are between 8-10 feet down on the grading on El Idden Farm Road and he did not believe there would be any visible impact in terms of view. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that after reading the ordinance be felt that the grading proposed on this lot would violate it. Commissioner Dahl stated that he had spoken with Mr. Lam about this and this particular problem was created by the County. He further indicated that this lot is subsized and not in keeping with the R -1- 20,000 lots but was R- 1- 18,000 exclusive of the street easements. Commissioner Scetanka stated th,c he dii not know wha-- the magic number is in creating excessive slopes but that since the lot size and grading had already been established, he felt it would be arbitrary to state that this would be an inappropriate sI.ope and would not say this 3^ excess-,re- Chairman K.i..-r asked for a demarcation line on what is already there and what is not. *Ir. Vairin respoWed *.: saying the Grading Committee was not sure if _'iis iS what the Pla,. _;.ep, Commission wanted as they have stated that they did not wish to have excessive grading on other projects that have come before them. He indicated that there is no magic number and this would be a judgement call on their part under the Ordinance 118. There was discussic" of areas where it was felt that there was excessive grading and cut and fills and Chairman King stated that he would like to have some examples of front lot grading brought before the Commission for comparison purposes. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that it scared him to think that a decision on this lot may be setting a precedent because this grading as proposed would be in violation of Ordinance No. 118. He indicated that it softens it for him if the Commission is able to make a finding that this would be an exception and agreed with Commissioner Retpel's observation that this lot is not in a natural state and has previously been graded. He indicated that this is a victim lot and would he like to see some kind of solution to allow grading of the lot in such fashion in away that has not been proposed. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he would like to see more examples of front - graded lots. Motion: Moved by Sceranka, seconded by Dahl, carried, to have staff come back, to the Commission on January 13 with examples of front grading for comparisons with what is beirg proposed. Commissioner Rempel voted no on this. Mr. Vairin stated that staff would furnish the Commission with photo - graphs of various grading examples. Mr. Lam stated that instead of showing the Commission pictures, staff will show the Commission areas in the City of grading in front lot situations. Commissicner Rempel stated that he disagreed with Mr. Lam as they would have to go into Pomona or Upland and San Antonio Heights in order to find homes with sloping conditions. He indicated that you will find scme very good homes with these kinds of slopes and cited those in the Eerkeiy area. Mr. Lam stated that there are some similar slopes within the City so that the Commission would be able to sec what a 14 -foot slope looks like. Further, when the Ordinance is spoken of, it is a judgement siruatik�n. He indicated that the sole issue is what constitutes an acceptable standard on front lot situations. G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVE*.APMENT REVIEW 140. 81 -35 - JENM - The development of two i- dustcial buildings totaling 36,240 square feet in size on 2.14 acr..A of land located at the northeast corner of 6th Street and Turner Avenue - APN 209- 261 -1.3. Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner, reviewed the staff report. Commissioner Sceranka asked what the landscaping wuuiA be in buildings C S D. Planr. 3 Commission Minutes -12- December 9, 1981 Mr. Johnston replied that facing the curb amZ building will be 33 feet of berming and that there will be 5 -foot planters in front of the buildings as well with trees all along the front. He indicated that the tree wells will contain creeping landscaping. Commissioner Sceranka asked if this had been agreed to in Design Review. Mr. Vsirin replied that this had been spoken of to help mitigate the view and thought that they had talked about g.zting trees all the way across originally. Mr. Vairin further stated that the applicant stated that he could take care of the problem of softening the effect of the building in this way and the Commission would have to decide if t1-is is acceptable. Chairman King mpened the public hearing. Mr. Dave Davis, the applicant, addressed the Commission and stated that they would only cap the culvert to the culvert line and not to Sharon Circle as proposed in the Resolution. He indicated that it did not make any economic sense and, if they were required to do so, they would abort the building because it would cost between $60,000 - 70,000 to do so and would not contribute to anything. Mr. Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer, stated that staff felt that capping as proposei would contribute to traffic safety but perhaps the best approach would be to view this as a, building permit. and not as a parcel map in requiring the conditions. He indicated that it would be possible to go along with the capping on the b•a`ing frnntage which is shown in Item 6 in the packets. Mr. Davis stated that the requirement is redundant because, it goes for a long way in both directions and that they wi= not be using Turner for ingress and egress out plan to get in and out at 6th Street. He indicated that they soul: put in the improvements only to later find that there is a e<_fferent elevation on Turner. He indicated that the cost of $50,000 w<^s not fair to have to bear on this. Mr. Davis also questioned the condition tl.at the buildings be spriti_klered, stating that they had gone to considerable expense to 11 erhe _d the returns. He asked if the =e was any exce-tion or alternative to the sprinklered buildings. Mr. I= replied that this condition can be modified to conform w-.th the Foothill Fire Protection District stands -sa which would allow them to take '--o consideration the work that is being done. Mr. Davies .Iso expressed concern with landscaping and being unable to see the number or names on the buildings as an identity problem. Planning Commission Minutes -•13- December 9, 1981. Commissioner Tclstoq stated that he was embarrassed to say this but the buildings as shown lack architectural treatment and appear to be a shoebox buildings with a top re _hem. He indicated that he did not like the buildings De they are redundant and need relief. He stated it was his hope that Design review wand do something to mitigate the front since there is such a lesge industrial area in the city with nice standards and looking at industrial parks, the buildings presented here just did not fly. Commissioner Sceranka commented on the bermin& to mitigate the impact of parking and the standards that are already established to achieve less of an impact. He also commea,.;a oa the buildings as proposed and how a textured trcataeat and vines would break up the 1.1- of the building. Mr. Vai-rin stated that he thought the buildings would be of a textured concrete. The architect for this project stated that the buildings would be con - struc'ed Of poured concrete and - would be tilt -.ups. Chairman King asked if the Commission was comfortable with this or whether the project should go back to Design Review as it appeared that a problem exists with design and landscaping. Mr. Davis stated that he wanted to know whether this was the same Planning Commission which approved other buildings that are near this project. He indicated that his is the best looking building there and that it was very, expensive having to come beck before the Commission. He indicated that he agreed with staff that 2 or 3 more trees or finger planters would break up the sterile look of the buildings. Commissioner Tclsby stated that what the Commission is trying to say is that the buildings need some kind of architectural treatment so that they will not look like shoeboxes with a Lop. Commissioner Rempel stated that the buildings to which Fs. Drlis re- ferred were not approves by the Commission. He further staced that the building at the southwest corner of Archioald and Arrow miEht be used as an exwYle a.` t m n*oe of features they would like to see in the project be-fore them this evening. Mr. Davis replied that there are some t:Angs that they can do to improve the looks of the building but for economic reason✓ they will not build them that way. Be indicated that if the Commission gives nebulous in- structions they will end zip with nothing. Commissioner Rempel stated that he understood what Mr. Davis is saying and t%-- first time Le c_-mes to Staff or Design Review, he shov4d be told what is wanted. Planning Commission Minutes -14- December 9, 1981 • Commissioner Dahl stated that on the material chart presented with this project a color is shown and asked if this would be a strip on the building, if so, where it would appear. The architect explained where it would be placed and also e--planned the steadardi:ed signs that would be used on C•ee building Commissioner Dahl stated that after looking at thr .esign close up he did not feel it was the same as lookiug ac it from a distance and when it is combined with the columns, six -foot setbacks, and the signing, the Commission has, in the pant, approved centers with the same thing. He indicated that he wol d like to see some trees planted along the freut area to balance with the other side. Be indicated further that there would be a problem with capping if the other areas were not also capped. He stated that he would rather see them doing the samr- thing with the capping that they would be doing with street dividers. He indicated that this should be done by bond requirement. Mr. Vairin stated for the record that staff has me recommended any positive approval of the design but has brought forward to the Desi;ln Review Committee their concerns. He indicated that this was the Design ^.eview Committee's recommendation, not staff's. Mr. Rougeau stated that be would like to speak further about the channel. Commissioner Tolstov asked if it is the intent of the City that ::.is be capped all the way from the tracks to the north. Mr. Rougeau replied af£irmarvely stating that t:42.9 serves a very ia- oortant function because it will be a may drain for many years until the project in the master plan can *:. completed. Further, Turner*Avenue when it builds out, is planned co be n 4-lane majcr street and the only way that they can get it is to widen it as they go along with projects as tbev are doinv :n this cape. Mr. Rougeau stated that they thought it would be fa±ter to cap on a parcel by parcel basis and that this origin- al parcel map has , condition that the channel would be covered at the time a building permit is issued as development takes place. Commissioner Tolstoy asked why the applicant can't go from 6th Street because it would be better to divide this over 6 patcels and asked if the intent of the original condition was to spread this out over the entire map as it developed. nr. Rougeau explained to the Commission :wow this would be done to spread the cost of development ever several parcels. Motion: Moved by Sceranka, seconded by Dahl, carried unanimously, that Resolution No. 81 -147 be adopted approving Development Review Ne. 81 -35 with the condition that this be brought back to Design Review for a change in landscaninR in buildings C and D to include trees in front to planning Commission Minutes -1r December 9, 1981 break up the severity of the b- silding by treatment in front, breaking aP the overhang, or changing the te7.ture on the facade. Commissioner Tolstoy asked how far the buildings a from the street. Mr. Davis replied that they are aPProYimately 100 feet. cated that with the length of the building it Commissioner Tolstoy i vli would seem that a 3a inch color strip is lest and suggested that it be made wider. It is not stated that with regard to landscaping of the door Commissi.oner Sceranka s par to have landscaping the property line. appropriate for people '� },e required up ways and that the cap should only he sprinklers - qr. Dav_s asked about t The couscnsu,` of the Commission was thst this would be included in the motion. COUNC-S down due to a possible coaflict of interest. Chairman ring stepped Council's concern c ort stating that the Cie slopes- �• Mr. 'ram reviewed t1e staff r elopment and the hills slopes o_ this c wa: chat of lot size in this period of mime- 1�. Lam ?,am also stated that the City Council did not want the applicant to be delayed fcr. an extensive p they had parti.uiar P takes up the issue of f resubdivision of stated that before the omission review the issue of resubd asked that the Planning look at the total number of lot s e e]ation- the larger lots and and whether it was appropriate- ship to the total lay of the land that he recommended that the Planning Commissi.o= stud for the entire hillside area, but that nre lest further stated feel would be request that staff begin a y Commission as to what e` they would be they would leave it ua to the Comma the simplest way ,,e. Re indicated that stated appropriate action to is ou cant resubdivide, that what action to rezone to R -1- 30,000 because y ssion felt the+ could do this alone if the ComtissiOl Council would get the that they taken was still approp Mr. Lam they had previously approval of the tract map- zone change and it would trigger the nymber of lots is not stated that if the ZomL! ssion felt that es tad the number of appropriate to address further the problem of sloe units as it relates to the lay of the land. they can discuss it at this time. Dece:tber 9, 1981 Planning Commission Minutes -16- i • Commissioner Tolstoy acked.if chat Mr_ L= was saying is that if the Commission should reco wwad zoning to R- 1- 30,000, the developer could go in and build one house every 30,000 sq. ft. Commissioner Dahl stated that this could not happen if thc,jxite plan is already there. MT. Lam stated that t1- is would not change the site plan. C:mmiszinner Dahl stereo that he felt the plan to that point is good and he dovelope- wor>'ed oiti the Commission and ,Design Reviee to handle areas of both heavier and lesser slopes and that he has nc, problem with R -1- 30,000. Notion: Moved by Sce •anka, seconded by Dahl, carried, to :one the site in question to R -1 -30 000. Commissioner Tolstoy noted no. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he had voted no previousl: and had to again because he felt that there should be somewhere withi: the City where there should be more large sized lots. He further slated that this particular piece of property lends itself to that kinl of situation because it is near a 'ault and nigh fire hazard area and tie topography lends itself to sometJing different than what they already thave. He stated that 30,900 sgtare foot lots is not the answer. Mr. Leon Redding, repxesenting the applicant, advised that he had no problem w'th the recommended zoning and that his only cone n-n is that they are being held up in their processing. He asked if t ey would be able to proceed. Mr. Hopson indicates tat the ordinance might be flexible !r,agh to do that anyway. Mr. Lam stated twat the Commission would get this at their Eirst meeting in January and that a ; ablic hearing must be conducted. CcamisFioner Dahl state! that this particular site plan le: 3s itself to R -1- 30,000_ He agreed vith Commissioner Tolstoy on the hi:lside property and felt_ that the densi,y should decrease as it proceeds ftcther into the development. He st.:ted that from the standpoint of aet aetics, fire safety, and slope this :s the same as the opposite side of Almond and he is in favor of this portion of this project- Commissioner Sceranka stated that the City Council wanted tae Planning Commission's feelings on this because of the slope range ol�,1 -10 percent and because of the fact :hat an unusable portion of land designated for open space is appropriat;. Planning Commission Minuses -17 Dei-eabar 9, k981 ar ' Commissioner Rempel agreed with the R- 1- 30,DOO and stated that his only comment on larger lots is that Caere isn' t say reason that a person buying the lots could not combine two lots to make it larger and did not feel that Commissioner Tolstoy's argument is a valid one. I. ROBEBTS GROUP AIM WESTL= VENTURE Mr. Lam reviewed the Council action on the Westland Venture and Roberts Group submittals stating that the City Council had conditioned these tracts so r %at density -pas limited to so more than 9 units per acre. He indicated that the Council did not change the zoning to R- 3 1P.D., in- stead, they changed is to R- 2/P.D. and under the State Planning Law, when they did this it created a legal requirement that this be returned to the P?znning Commission for a report of their action. Further, that as soon as the report had been made t:) the Commission, the City Council would have a second reading of the ordinance to change the zoning. Mr. Lam then explained haw the Pia-ming Commission might respond to the Council's action. zalssioner Sceranka asked .low the City Council could approve the total project and change the zoning. Mr. Lam explained that the City - ouncil could change anything relative to the project at tart time on appeal. He-Indicated that they had the legal right to do sc an.: elected to change the zoning. Commissioner Sceranka stated that he wished to make some comments. He indicated tl.at this project is near where he lives aril he was not rep- resented by the homeowners and would have spoken had he known that Council was going to t:_ke this action. Commissioner Sceranka stated that he has some particular and serous concerns with their action on this not on the 'basis of the political situation within tbz.t development but on the basis of his being a Planning Commissioner. Mr. Sceranka stated that when this protect went through Design Review with the developer they tried to mitigate homeowners concerns. Further, that he had a s -rious problem with how- 'they can take the freeway corridor, Alta Loma Channel, and a thoroughfare and not consistently say that this project is not appropriately medium density -and yet approve a project on Foothill near Hellman of 19 units an acre which is on one art...M.-I —. — a rhnn.wi —I aiAJ Adiactent ?n single family homes. He indicated that he is very concerned and uncom- fortable with setting a precedent in this community in not giving the northern property in this city affordable housing projects and saying that any affordable projects will be below Foo thill only. He stated that because of this, he cannot support the City Council's action on the basis of density. Planning Commission Minutes -18- December 9, 1981 Commissioner Sceranka indicated further chat Council's action took the prices of the homes from the affordable range to higher than what those across the street are worth. Commissioner Sceranka stated that since this would be a report to the City Council, he- feels that o: the basis of the trees per acre which is higher than those required in a single family tract, the 120 foot right -of -way, the buffering between the single family residences, and with the conditions imposed to mitt .gate traffic impacts, that the density requested is appropriate. Commissioner Dahl stated that the only affordable housing that presently exists in the City is in the northern section of Alta Loma at Carnelian and 19th Streets, in the Lewis tract where the prices range from $43,900 - 59,000. Mr. Dahl further stated that another project bad been approved at Highland and Haven which is approved by HOD, and classified as afford- able. He indicated that in Cucamonga only two or three projects are approved and classified as affordable. Further, that any time an attempt is made to put in high density housing in an area of single family resi- dence:, the main concern of people is not traffic and density, it is property value. He indicated that he did not know if be could support R -3 zoning bct felt it should be R -2 as the Council recommended with redesign and with the bad points swallowed by the °Aberts Group. He also stated that through the General Plan the Commission looked at 19th Street for high tensity and when you get up to Higbland, be felt that it was an area where y.0 would want to start decreasing density. Commis- sioner Dahl stated that the General Plan was pushed through to meet a deadline and now that th,- Commission is no longer under a deadline, they should spend more time wits it and support-it. Commissioner Rempel stated that he agreed with what Commissioner Sceranka said about traffic but that what he missed is that the Planning Commission's main concern was traffic at Archibald which was discussed at the hearing. One of the things that the Commission tucked about is that the street should be widened out and they gave direction to do that. He felt that the Commission had done the prover thing in meking the recommendations that they did for the Roberts Group and Westland Shafer. Commissioner Rempel stated that his recommendation going back to Council would be to adopt the recommendation as passed by the Commission as they did the right thing when they sent it to Council. Chairman Ming stated that it is difficult to view separately the question 9 of the projects submitted to the Coomuission apart from the zoning requested. He stated that if a piece of trash had come in for the same area and a change of zone had been sought, the Commission would have viewed it differently. Chairmaa Ring indicated that thin, was a totally excellent project and when the zoning was requested was viewed in con- junction with the General Plan and the project, the recommendation made by the Commission was totally appropriate. He indicated that he had no reservations whatsoever. Planning Commission MivutkA -19- December 9, 1981 Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he wished to be pictured as a balancing scale because on the one hand you have the property owners protesting the high density and he is empathetic with them, and this project as the Coz-aission looked at it is no-u in keeping with the neighborhood as it is today. He indicated that a freeway will be going through, although it is still a dream. He stated that he knew Commissioner Dahl is wrong to think that there will not be one because in a foothill community it will be there v%atever it i:: called. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that there will be some people who will say, Planning Commission, this is where the density should go. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that the flip side of this is tha. there are people why live next to hi-- %fho don't take care of their property and be agrees that the density is high and his only concern is Archibald. There was discussion on the area set aside for higher density in the General Plan and higher dans:.ty as proposed in this project. The Planning Commission consensus was 4-1 against the City Council's decision to rezone these projects to R- 2 /P.D. and to uphold their recommendation for zoning of R- 2 /F.D. for these projects. There was discussion between Commissioners Dahl and Sceranka relative to the definition of affordable housing and where affordable housing is located in the City. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that the City Council has a very sensitive situation facing them as one of their calculations has to be what is the consequence of vbat they do. If they were to reverse themselves to agree with the Commission that may trigger something the Planning Commission may not like and that is the swelling up of a number of people in this community with an initiative of no growth. The City Council will have to look at that, he stated. Further, he thought that as 2 Planning Commissioner he made the right decision tonight, but he thought it would be pretty bad if the City Council doesn't measure the community and he would not be upset at all if the Council chooses not to go along with the Commission. Because, if they did not, the citizenry may close this City down. Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Rempel, carried unanimously, to adjourn to a Terra Vista workshop on December 17, 1981, at 7 p.m. at the Neighborhood Center. 10:52 p.m. The Planning Commission adjourned. Planning Commission Minutes -20- December 9, 1981' • Respectfully submitted, JACK LAM, Secretary f3zi:. FLs ing Ca®ission Minutes -21- n� w . i CITY OF RANCHO CUCILMNGA PLANNING COWESSION MIN= Informal Study Session - Terra Vista Planned Community December 17, 1981 PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: Jeffrey King, Herman Rempel, Jeff Scerax!ka ABSENT: COM4aSSIONERS: Pichar3 Dahl, Peter Tolstoy STAFF _PRESENT: Robert Dougherty, City Attorney; Jack Lam, Director of Community Development; Janice Reynolds, Secretary; Arlene Troup, Assistant Planner; Michael Vairin, Senior Planner Senior Planner, Michael VaL -in, opened the informal study session of the Planning Commission regarding the Terra Vista Planned Community at 7:15 p.m. Mr. Vairin informed those in attendance that this meeting vas to be informal in nature and was an opportunity for the Commissioners to express their views and some of the_r concerns of the project before the public hearings formally begin. He also stated that copies of the Environmental Impact Report were nor available and the forty -five day review period had begun. Mr. Vairin advised the Commissioners that a public hearing schedule would be presented to the Planning Commission at their meeting of January 13, 1982. Chairmar. King asked that the meeting tonight revolve mainly around questions and concerns that the Commissioners had regarding the project rather than questions by the Lewis Development Company of Staff and the Commissioners. He also requested that the slide presentation be expedited as two out of three of the Commissioners had already viewed it as well as most of the audience. Mr. Ki Suh Park of Gruen and Associates narra.:ed the slide presentation which took approximately 25 minutes Chairman King asked if anyone from the audience had any questions or comments at this time. There were none. Chairman King gave the floor to the Commissioners. Commissioner Rempel :asked what the reasoning was for placing the medical area so that it would be surrounded by the auto park area. He asked if it would be better to place it near the executive park area rather than placing the hospital in an area where it overlooked car dealerships. Mr. Park replied that the auto park concept was not proposed to be the typical car dealership. Camm- 4asioner Rempel stated that there might be more visibility for the auto dealership I' the hospital was moved more into the commercial area. Ray Mattonk stated that a major firm had expressed their desire to build • hospital in the Terra Vista area and it was their desire to not be �m • commercial area because of the traffic problems that would occur with emergetcy vehicles. This was the reason the Rochester site was selected. Commissioner Rempel replied that be felt that it would fit more into a high density area rather than an area of open -type commercial. Mr. Park said that the area was proposed to be heavily landscape9 to make it fit in with the residential area. Commissioner Rempel stated that he was not saying that he was opposed to the hospital being placed Jr- this area, merely that he thought it might fit in better in another area of the project. Commissioner Rempel asked for a definition ;f the term "Recreation/ Ccmmercial ". Mr. Park explained that these were commercial uses that were more geared to residential uses or to urns that would be used cost by residents for recreational purposes. Commissioner Rempel asked if these uses would include bowling alleys, racquetball clubs and things of this nature. Mr. Park replied that those would be the types of uses found in Recreational /Commercial areas. Chairman Ring asked if it was Lewis' opinion that the amount of acreage in the property south of Foothill in the area of Haven and the Foothill Freeway Corridor for office park uses was enough or not enough area. Mr. Park replied that this area was to include a mix of uses and felt that it was a sufficient amoutt of acreage. Chairman Ring stated that he was concerned that the General Plan over - officed the area. In the area of Haven and Foothill there appeared to be an awful lot of office uses and he did not wish to see the area become over impacted with this type of use. Ralph Lewis of Lewis Homes stated that as office space sold they would build more space. His opinion was that his office projects were a quality project and usually did better than bis competitors'. He further stated that if in the future the market called for somethia3 other than what Lewis proposed, they would be flexible to the change and %A--U Planning Commission Minutes -2- December 17, 143 Ip build the desired product. Comaissioa Sceranka stated that he was still going through the data and research material and stated that his opinions were more observations than criticisms. He asked what the intent of the auto paz k and the recreational commercial was and clarification of it because of the designations in the other commercial sections. He stated that there was an auto park designation, yet within the other commercial sections there is also provision for auto park. He asked if this was consistent or inconsistent. Mr. Park replied that this was consistent but the difference was the image tz-mt it created. He stated that if you look at the land use it looks like the same in each of the areas; however, the mix of uses is different in each of the areas. Commissioner Sceranka stated that he would like Lewis Development to consider and address in future meetings some of the things that he thought were particularly offensive on Foothill Boulevard sod one of them was the placement of a car dealership on that street. He stated that he would like to see the auto uses restricted to only certain categories and would like this discussed later in the review process. He felt that placing auto dealerships and recreational uses in as a contiguous area as possible, was logical. He commented that he liked the concept of recreational commercial as they were compatible but wondered if the areas around it should be restricted to +.bose uses proposed. Commissioner Sceranka also stated that he wished comment on the solar concept of the plan. He stated that the comment in the text, i.e., that active solar techniques for energy conservation were usually not cost effect3.ve and would not be utilized, was not a good statement. He felt that there were some active systems available that were good systems and the statement led him to believe that a closer look should be taken at the use of active systems. Richard Lewis stated that it was common Imowledge that solar energy was the coming thing of the future.. However, the reasoning behind this statement was that it was not Lewis' desire at this point to be locked into this type of system. Commissioner Sceranka expressed his concerns with the location of the hospital. He stated that as Rochester was not designed as a major traffic carrier, he was concerned that the Victoria and Etiwanda traffic would travel down Rochester into the residential tract to the hospital and the residential tract would bear the brunt of the traffic. He asked if it was wise to place the hospital in a residential area where it would generate so much traffic. c Planing Commission Minutes -3- December 17, 1981 Richard Lewis replied that the area for the hospital site was selected by the firr that desired to build the hospital but that this was not a size spe, if'_c. He suggested that a representative of the hospital group could meet with members of staff to discuss the location. Ra::ph Lewis str.ted that a traffic study had been done as part of the EIR that researched the traffic impacts on Rochester and the residential area. Commissioner S.aranka expressed another concern of his regarding the retail commercial areas in that they were not designed for foot traffic- He stated that lack of foot traffic is one of the problems with the existing shopping centers in the City. He further stated that he was very much opposed to the placement of the two neighborhood commercial centers at Milliken. He offered an opinion that one tester or village concept, located at an intersection and designed for fcot traffic, should be considered. Commissioner Sceranka stated that he understood that Milliken was a major street and having the center on tl:e right side of the street as you went home was the sensible thing to do, however, felt the subject center would not suffer from being placed closer to the higher density areas in order to maximize foot traffic. Chairman King asked why the neighborhood commercial centers were placed in the areas proposed. Ralph Lewis replied that these locations were not the locations desired by the Lewis Development Company, but were placed there by the City's General Plan. Chairman Icing asked if they could choose any two locations within the project, where they would place the commercial centers. Mr.. Lewis replied that the best location would be the top of the CC property. Chairman King asked that if the only reascu they were located as shown on the map was because those were the areas designated on the General Plan. This was the consensus of the Lewis Development Company. Mr. Park addressed the concern retarding the location of the commercial centers. He stat.� that higher density was placed outside the periphery to encourage font traffic and to encourage use of the green belt system. The concept behind the location of the centers was to have a gateway to the project. If the placement of the centers was looked at from a tenant's point of view, inside the project would be the best location; however, from the merchant's point of view, many could not survive in that location. Planning Commission Minutes —4— December 17, 1981 Commissioner Sceranka stated that he was aware of the various reasons fc- merchants wanting high visibility, however a village commercial concept is more viable from a community point of view and residents would use the center because it would be the most convenient. Commissioner Rempel stated that he thought that this was not really the case as people would be driving back and forth to work and could patron- ize other centers enroute. he felt that the village concept should be researched very thoroughly. Commissioner Sceraaka stated that a village commercial concept may have more credibili.y depending on how it is set up. He further stated that even though major ten=ts were in a commercial center, it was often the smaller businesses surrounding it that suffered because the centers are not designed for foot traffic. Commissioner Rempel stated that you could design a center for foot traffic but getting people to utilize it was another matter. He felt that the center world do best being designed for both foot and auto traffa.c and by putt:.ng the center in the middle of the project you would not be doing that. He further stated that he was still of the opinion that the best location for the center was the Haven and Base Line location. He felt that a definite trail area to the center would be helpful. Commissioner Sceranka stated that this area would probably be the topic of much more discussion at the public hearing level. He asked whether the two centers would be tied together through the use of one common theme or be designed tc retain their separate identities. Mr. Park replied that what goes into the center will determine the theme of that particular center, not the function of the shops in the center. Commissioner Sceranka stated that he felt the open space parts of the project needed to be emphasized in high density areas. He said he had a particular problem with the highest density of the project being across the street from the main open space corridar. He further stated that he would like to see the pedestrian access routes, parks and open space in relation to high density areas thoroughly addressed in the public hearing stages. Mr. Park replied that the greenway concept of :he plan was to give a sense of security and urban character and charm to the high density areas. Commissioner Ring asked what was the rationale behind placing the park on Milliken where it was located rather than across the street. Mr. Park replied that one of the reasons for that particular placement was to provide a park setting for adjacent residents. The area it is in now, is closely related to the flow of the drainage for the project. He further stated that the parks would touch the loop system designed Planning Commission Minutes -5- December 17, 1981 in the project and create a feeling of security and also would create ' a visual image though the various types of landscaping. Chairman King stated that he was wondering how it related to Commissioner Sceranka's concern relative to having the open space cluser to higher density by moving it across the street because it is a large piece of open space. He understood that by placing it where it was it surrounded the recreational commercial area and in that light it makes sense: however, Commissioner's Sceranka's statement concerning having the open space nearer to higher density also is true. By moving it across the street at Milliken it does destroy ti:c concept proposed in relating park space to recreation commercial but it places the park space closer to higher density vUle still maintaSl the overall concept of the park system. Commissioner Rempel stated that he did not feel that cutting the park up would help the project at all and it was evident by the grade of the open space that it was designed as a water retention area and that by cutting the park up and placing it in different areas it would be creating more problems. Pzlph Lewis informed the Commissioners that the high density areas were proposed to be heavily landscaped and would have some private recreation and open space areas. He further stated that most residents of the high density areas would probably be wor':ing people and single people, not people with families that would be using the parks and that was the reason for not placing them closer to high density areas. Commissioner Sceranka stated that another issue he wanted to bring lip was importance of a credit for open space, storm drains, and reten:ion basins and how it all relates to each other in park use. The major issue would be one of whether open space and retention basins mixed together is a concept that makes ser!se to everyone. He further stated that this would be one of the areas he would be paying close attention to. Ns. Park replied that the park areas were not being designed as catch I asins, but graded in a way that the rain water would collect in that ::rea to be drained off. There were no further questions and the meeting adjourned. 8:30 p.m. Study session Adjourned. Planning Commission Minutes -6- December 17, 1981 is M ,y Respectfully submitted, JACK LAM, Secretary Planning Commission Minutes —7— \•J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF DEPORT DATE: January 13, 1982 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development BY: Karl Hill, Planning Aide SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO BACKGROUND: The attached letters from the Applicants request extensions for the above- described projects. The requests are based on the need for tice to complete the prescribed Conditions for each Tract Map. The Appli- cants state that it is not economically feasible to carplete the Tracts at this time, although they are trying to complete them as soon as possible. Tracts 10046 and 10047 have requested extensions so that an Assessment District may be formed in order to allow construction of the Alta Loma Channel. The Assessment District is intended for the purpose of spread- ing the cost of the channel among the various landowners along the chan- nel. The above listed Tracts have not submitted plans for plan check to date. The approved Tentative Tract Haps are shown on the attached Exhibits "B" through "n Listed below are the present expiration dates for each project. Tract Expiration Date 9441 2 -25-82 10035 3 -25 -82 10046 12 -22 -81 10047 12 -22 -81 10277 2 -2:5 -82 iu316 'r25 -82 10349 1 -14 -82 11606 3 -11 -82 11609 3 -11 -82 11625 1 -28-82 Thes- Tracts are residential subdivisions and their locations are shown on Exhi,`t "A ". it has been the policy of the Planning Commission to approve 18 month extensions on residential subdivisions having been orig- inally approved for 12 months. The extension periods being sought by the above listed suLdivisions are within the regulations set forth in the Sub- division Ora :nanve. ITEM A Time Extension Requests P1anring Commission Agenda January 13, 1982 Page 2 RECOMENDATION: It is recommended that an 18 month extension be granted for Tentative Tracts 9441, 10035, 10046, 10047, 10277, 10316, 10349, 116062 11609, 11625 to run from the present expiration dates to the dates listed in the attached Resolution. Respectfully submitted, e '€ 7; 3 JACK LAN, AICP Director of Community Development JL:KH:jr Attachments: Letters from Applicants Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibits "8 " - "K" - Tentative Tract Maps Resolution E .® n L RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAM04GA PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING THE EXTENSIONS FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO'S. 9441, 10035, 10046, 10047, 10277 10316, 10349, 11606, 11609, 11625 WHEREAS, applications have been filed for time extensions for the above - described projects, pursuant to Section 1.401.11.2 of Ordinance 23-8, the Subdivision Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commissio., has held auly advertised public hearings for the above - described projects; and WHEREAS, the Planrcno Commission conditionally approved the atro%e- described tentative tract maps. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commissior has made t"e following findings: A. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a lack of financing and high interest rates for con - -.truction; B. That these economic conditions make it u=nreasonable to build at this time; C. That external physical ccnditions have caused w7ay start of construction; D. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval i•egardi;,g expirations would not be consistent with the intent of the Zoning Code; E. That the granting of said time extensions will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or wel- fare, or materially injurious to properties or improve- ments in the vicinity. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants time extensions for the above - described projects as follows: Tract 9441 10035 10046 10047 10277 10316 10349 11606 11609 11625 Expiration Date 8/25/33- 9/25/83• 5/22/83 - 5/22/83 8t25/83, 9/25/83 - 7/14/83- 9/11/83- 9/11/83• 7/28/83' Resolution No. Page 2 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1982. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Gim-Tssion i I, -LACK LAM, Secretary of the Plan ing Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that :he foregoing Resolution was duly and. regularly intrt-duced, passed, and .dopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of January, 1982, by the following vote' to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 0 0 EUCL�� If If 2 I� y x G L,I i a GA " l Z• �'T/ VINEYARD AVE.' CtlCAU04 �� RNEAN 5T. m ° T It II a f" ai o' ao ,F�y Y `> NELtMAN =E. j1 L O r � 4RCMtHACD AVE. a N x � p = TORNER J w x If FIERM T r 1 it O TaC -r CflY H MAVEN AVE � OO1 -�x2 CiQ II r.f N / ty1 0 0 1 0 1 � ?OCMESTER AVE. o t z - - -- DAY CREEK ' N 1 ar low voloom tJvv E T: IYANOA AVE.� 7,. Ila 1 x ♦ < IN � , s rv- z c r x f o > N y Q o CHERRY AVE. .. � x Q II 9 t I U a A4 1� 5 CITY OF a rR ,y0, i^ rt;Gp,R'0.lGi+ COMv;UafTV r,FvE' nvrncr T D "ri iL L LC6 P9 AN A CaGjorrua Limited Partnership. 718 �9ti0jdcZ2t�t`Zt3���5�& Z December 17, 1981 CERTIFIED ;NAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Mr. Lloyd Hubbs City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga PO BOY. 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91730 RE: Pembroke Farm Extension Request for Tentative Tracts 9441 & 11609 Dear Mr. Hubbs: Purzuant to our recent telephone conversation, we are writing tr, you at this time to confirm your advice that pursuant to revised Government code section 66452 -6 that approved or cDmitionall} approved tentative maps shall expire Z4 m_lnt!s aft--- date which we understand becomes effective Zanuary 1, 1987. It would therefr„ c, be appreciated if you could provide �.s with written ccnfiraation that the above tentative tract mars 9441 arA 11609 are covered by the amendments to the Government cede and tnere- fore will receive automatic extensions through Februany 25, 198=•. In the event that The City of Rancho Cucamonga does noi. interpret the amended Government code to provide this automatic extension, please accept this letter, as formai request for a 12 month exV -nsicn on tentative tracts 9441 and 11609 to be granted in jrder tha'. all the enoin -acing work and design requirements can be coapleted in a timely but accurate fashion prior to submitting to the .ity Cruncil for final map approval. Enclosed is a check in the amount o $124.00 which u.,e understand is required for fiie fees for this r- %quest to be considered. Obvifour,ly, if the amended Government code section is interpreted in accordant- with your advice I would appreciate it if you would return the check with your letter of confirmatio-n . if the fee is noc r..quiree- Many thanks. Si cprely, . ' I ' Paul K. Cootub .Presi defif- PKC zqM cc*Fessrs..St. Sandberg, D. Hone Enclvsure 2716 Ocean Park Blvd., Svite 10,05, Santa Ca. 3040f Pr - , DiDC( A7L�i[ �R!(, y: XZ4�k" Y�7' IP1nRYPiO /lC".'YM!'e "P[C14'r . I' I ' 1p . .ASa.s pmm: dw+wM �-V6 W J10FUM M&IMBM itC1 -LMML Y�C� Y,.1fp. I�71CJ •YI Tflr OiY OOK 1M.Mvg 9L #fir .r. cr vo- • � Arun rrww. r� r. •�.. V P. o!•U. o/ o tub] 2.L tl x:571\ I bAN�O Irk 7.* v" .O'� SgOj . I' I ' 1p . .ASa.s pmm: dw+wM r WE Ll • o f r 1 r 1 { I 9L #fir .r. r WE Ll • o f r 1 r 1 { I 6 - / � § \ f R� | - ���� W : R\ I§ \ R ` )� ! � I | W : R\ I§ \ )� ! � • |/ -.P445 f� � r $P- -;,M Oft- k� �® � ��laa.:?• W : R\ E \ m O o0 \ Z 2§ � • |/ -.P445 f� � r $P- -;,M Oft- k� �® � ��laa.:?• AA- "Mipeg cs. PAELVER 2,1262 ra:anrr►4CYM4r- L•'cxJ -'C%0 s7o SLX E 2cn 'so,zaaNee. cA Fc%zrva acre (2-44 arm -oaen -Lr.OL nr L-OceR December %1, 19 ?1 City of Pancho Carz -xon a 9641 San Bernard. - <o Road Rancho Cucarang,.,, CA 91730 j At cep :.ion - M - .hae'l Vai rin 1! S 2nior PI tier t ommunity Dev. Dept. j Re: Jc'_� ::c,_ 299 T•aacative Tract_ No. 16035 Dea. Mr. Vairin: �Ve hereby zequest m one year time e::tersion is which to record: f Tract No. 16015, which is eme = exp,.ra cn March 25, :982. J t''e need the aedzti.ontal tl e is which to record the tract map due to the Pact in hj.s: taken us songa:,: ::Plan expected to work out our utils.ty proAlszus src? as the sew,,;ir and storm dray --n.. I :save encicsed t'.ia $62.00 Extension request tee needed to proc_ss tl%is request. j Please schedule this requer�t av soon as possible on the Planning Ccn=ission .Age*ida. I: ,'au have a.sy questio -is please coutacr. Tae. Vzarc t =uly !,ours, ` Butt Maze i`*w + Proio•ct 3upe*zvis %:r EM-:zb v' D�iLn�1 cm' J: P.:,S ri�,..f :..�.'•�'Ji, ..,,: Ag vi., 12111213,4tS.,06 ,. f `.\ r- Lam` ' �•. a . I K 1 4 V Ti --z W7 •�' \. i t r w:o i C...b. t � Ir a 3 Os *f t;' W F t , IIIIbF CA N `& I y T V U. P ;�, i a a� i � •all'.• \� t:, _ =. " t I f •1 ..- 1 -, ...____ =,r.11 °SSW =C•.. •�` ,�� � 1 Vx V. al r, 8 �\ N r, L. O. King, Inc. 517 N. Euclid Avenue Ontario, California 91762 (7 14) 988-5492 ENGINEERS/PLANNERS December 9, 1981 File: 574 -16,20 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 9340 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, Califoraia 91730 Subject: Time Extersion for Tract 10046 ,Revised Request) Gentlemen: An eighteen month extension of time is requested for Tenta- tive Tract 10046. This extension is necessary to meet all of the conditions for final approval, especially the condition requiring the improvement of the Alta Loma Channel. The cost of this improvement is quite significant and cannot be borne by a single developer. The developer of this property is actively exploring means to improve this channel in coopera- tion with adjacent developmental interests ar.d the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Attached is the $62.00 filing fee. (previously submitted) if you have any questions please call. Cordially, D. H. t YS, Branch Manager DHM /GLH:mc Enclos-are /check $62.00 CC: Bill Pauli Ofticas in: ONTARIO and SANTA ANA L L 0. King, Inc. 517 N. Euci.d Avenue Ontario, California 5;762 {714) 988.5492 ENGINEERS/PLANNERS Dece;aber 10, 1981 File: 574 -18,20 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 9340 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91.730 Subject: Time Extension for Tract 10047 (Revised Request) Gentlemen: An eighteen_ month extensicn of time is requested for Tenta- tive Bract 10047. This extension is necessary to meet all of the conditions for final approval, sspecialiv the condition requiring the improvement of the Alta Loma d annel. The cost of this improvement is quite sigmificant and .:annot be borne by a single developer. The developer of this property is actively exploring means to improve this channel in coopera- tion with adjacent developmental interests and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Attached is the $62.00 filing fee. ;previously submitted) If you have any questions please call. Cordially, D. H. MAYS, P.E. Branch Manager DHM /GI.ii : me Enclosure /check $62.00 CC: Bill Pauli _ Ofrlon;n: ONYARIO wd SANTA ANA ---z . tit e••`�z� �• `�" t� CI w:3�u �q'Y •`� w i •' i .ry �4t Zt s Q c! ]J •JTII I � •r �: t � 3tll i�C' [ f �l i � :• :'[rr,.i % .....,.... /_[.r -r� r •� i _ .• . I _ . �ii.,: ,._ - - -_. , ; '��! �; /'rte h ��•�`• 7 � '• �"��'i7urt! '• �� � 1 �Y \ �\ t. � I�'� �`ijn+r,. � ly l..� O• .:u�°� � = �� ;:fir. ✓. " % � l' r , v� ti I f ,l rl TSS� A �i � i� I� 1 S ZA EZ 1•-- '-,�- „`.+^i.� I/� lil t rl'I 1' 1 ,• 4`• (i�. wt .fya at ✓ •a w :\l3 5 • � }YY `r. wx N Yµ. rkyy� li. t � °b Y�SY � i "��• ° < yyR n ?asj •j° >Wt• ynUw y`T a:y CCCL2 iY� � SC 1'• Zw .i` d/ ii ii pay =•; NNw V LU Z + >i• L.Y t � °b Y�SY � i "��• ° < yyR n ?asj •j° >Wt• ynUw y`T a:y CCCL2 iY� � SC 1'• Zw .i` d/ ii ii I- r !- ay Q. �rgE w. V' M t 15 I :i 1 r A 0 NNw V I- r !- ay Q. �rgE w. V' M t 15 I :i 1 r A 0 r December 17, 1981 '•1' �' \:n rk Planning Commission A11g�g�41,� c/o Jack Lamb, Community Development CoordinatbY ^lanning department, City Ii0.11 340 Baseline Road .rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 subject: TENTATIVE TRACT NmER 10277 Dear Jack, Please find enclosed, $62.00 made out to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an extension for the above referenced tract. We would appreciate an additional six month-. of time to assure against exp-�ration of our trait_ Thank you for your assistance in this matter. If th'are is any add- itional material that is required, please do not hesitate to contact me a' your convenience. Yours,very truly, �� i A ANDREW BARMAKIAN Architect, AIA AB /sg Enclosure 0 nil Iit sJ rOOjiii'�` .l 4 . s 11M ad 17 _; � � Yr ILt 2a y r� � � .'S.. y i • •` � • �'� r `p.- zlit 1 , ,, ��.� its i , i• ii. �y}yp::. � ,` , uH, iRl ���xa`•� ; ,•girl :�,' � �_ . 1; � _ ' • aG r r e ' . "Ek ;��° } ��p" �' � a �C. ��� I 1 ' wfr r✓ —•rte ',.. ► ,q Ilk- lit Z V � j • r�y� � _i, a� y... >..zl -�.. "�.ja. �'l � wwla.MO.A �\ ~ 1 �,•.. , �.•, •.l. iya �. � ►yn .y f . r•wylrry •� .�? 4 DELL M. McOANIEL9 INC. 1013 N. BEGONIA AVENUE .0 ONTARIO. CALIFORNIA 91762 December 17, 1981 City Of BanCao Cucamonga F.C. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga. Ca 91730 RE& TT 10316 Attns Dan Coleman, Assistant Planner Dear .•Ir. Coleman. DELL IA. MCDANIEL ROBERT W. GRIFFITTS GARY 0. MCDANIEL e (714)986.2474 IV-11Y CF RAi'dUM CUCAMONGA COM sUNITY PEW OMIFNT DEPT. AS PM 7a8�9����►�12�1i2t3�4�5'6 3 We are enclosing our check along with this letter regvssting a one year time extension on the above referenced tract. D'1e to the unsettled economic Conditions which this industry is facing we feel it woo td be unwise on our part to build this tract at this time. Thank you for your cooperation in this mctter. Should You need any further inforimation, please do not hesitate to contact me. Yours Truly, DELL M. Vfo Zbi~. Gary D. McDaniel Vice President MT /kh Encl8 M 11 tot ds 4 1. L `55 t .4 I � � 1 .E 11 ; t • � [F f Associated Eng!'neers CoNSUirNGsMLE:*UNE£RS 315 EAST •E' STREET • ONTARIO. CAUFORN IA 1784 • (714) 984 -5818 December 16, 1981 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department Planning Division P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ATTN: 1% r. Dan Coleman Subject: Tentative Tract Ne. 10349 Dea- Dan: On ben: _f of our client, we -ierel^y request an extension of time for the A'lanning Commission Approval of b.• subject Tract. Enclosed is our check in the amount of $62.00 for the extent:.; -- -ae. This -request is necessary due to the economic conditions in the housins industry which make it unfersible to proceed with the project. 0 Thank you for your timely notification of the impending expiration date. If additional information is required, please tali. cc: Mike Kelber 77-77 FRW:Ijn Gii= It; V s S.I U COM;AUNi Y C!',E;CPVF14T DEPT. 7 ..,n L•r=� 1 X501 PIA =� ..l.r��1(g11i213 j445t6 I r,-1 L� f I. + 1 R tip,, r j# 4u { 7 r .ro Yri'f�f flf` l�. � i�- Ii•irti 1- ~I �~ ; m L���1�3� :�i�yi:�i���f3�``�sily�''nili; •�` a d<nc�ti.i:,w�ran.ri � �n'sitre �« 1 r • �w II�II 'j �i { {��� (�I�{ tI1 �•1 -0a � 1 I �a X ;= Cj ac _ > Yri'f�f flf` l�. � i�- Ii•irti 1- ~I �~ ; m L���1�3� :�i�yi:�i���f3�``�sily�''nili; •�` a d<nc�ti.i:,w�ran.ri � �n'sitre �« 1 r • �w II�II 'j �i { {��� (�I�{ tI1 �•1 lbw - - ► �� ET C. DOUGLAS CORGEN Attorney at Law 7333 Heilman Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. 91730 (714) 987 -6328 Decerooer i8, 1981 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community DevelopmFnt Department Planning Divisicr. P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. 91701 Re: Tent Tract 11606 Ti ;.c Extension Request Dear Sirs: We hereby request an extension of time to record Tent. Tract, 11606. This Tent. Tract map was approved on March 11, 1981, and was :nitally granted one ye%r to record. We are requesting an eighteen mo:" n exten- sion be granted for the recordation of this map in accordance with the other extensions currently being granted by the City. Our reason for requesting the extension of time is based on the poor financing market that has existed for over the past year. We are proceed- ing with the final engineering and are ready to proceed when the market improves. EEnclosed is our check for $62.00 representing the extension request fee. Thank you for your cooperation and assistance it this :natter. Please notify me when this matter will car;, up for hearing. 40 0 Yours rri ly :' � ` r / -mss ✓/ CLr'f�G�s _ Douglas Go.-gen, Partner West End 1pvestments %Ltd. CDG:vr v Eec:. Ext. check CITY Of Fr1it:'C CUCAMONGA ooMml1C11T� "EvE. pM -trNT M.K. M is a�, +r 0 Jr� 40—F cAgfx be. .•r�.u=. Lr�.- .�i.t::- i.�.•jt 1 w} a(s�I ;/ �� -,,. y�C L) 'f, %'a -. ,ll ' /�' �•.�.. -4.. 'ZV :'Cf1Oq SrR, ANACAL ENGINEERING CO. ENGINEERING nOfT Cl �R_ \II/'_I�•��/..I II rIVI .i/•%HP L =. fir. I ..' ._ . ' �.re r.w ��r1•.rq �i I , rl,rrrrel: yr� >1/Y/ W� r. �T....n w Iw w� Y ^K •.A •r I 1' Wa i 4 — —•gip :I I � - _r . ^a 1720 Last 6arry Avenue. Suite 2B5 Santz Ana, California 5270% phone 714: 754:6242 THE ROBERTS GROUP. INC. December 18, 1981 City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California Att: 'dike Verian, Senior Planner 6 Re: Tentative Tract li.T25 Dear Mr. Verian, The Roberts Group, Inc. hereby requests that the tentative map on the above referenced project be extended for the maxim::m time allowable. Enclosed please find our check in the asount of $62.00 to caver the fee. Please let me know as soon as this will be able to be placed on the Planning Commission agenda. Sincerely, TEE ROBERTS GROUP, -1XC. Toni Quezada Director of Forward Planning TQ /le.l enc: one �x CITY ©= tiFd4 ` CvCfibiONsA COMratt t I? A-14T QEPi_ llBl P9 3 D a 11J CPPY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 13, 1982 TO: Plannine Cnmmiccion FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 5126 - STEPHEN Parcel Map 5126 is a division of'3.30 acres of land into 4 parcels within the R- 1- 20,000 zone located or the northwest corner of Klusman and Whirlaway. Approvai was given on June 11, 1980 by the Plann -ing Commission with the condi- tion that the applicants adjust the line of lots 2 and 3 to meet minimum zoning ordinance requirements. This approval expires on December 11, 1981. Attached is a letter dated November 19, 1981 from the developer requesting a six -month time extension for recordation of Parcel Map 5126. Y.e has stated that engineering drawings have been prepared and may be submitted when extension is granted. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that a six -month extension of time be granted and such extension to expire on June li, 1982. Respectfully submitted, LBH Attachments ITEM B s I, JACK LAM. Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held or the 13th day of January, 1982, by the following vote- RYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES. romMISSIONERS: ASSEN;: COMMISSIONERS: C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STS REPORT DATE: January 13, 1982 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Loyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 5126 - t'EPHENSON Parcel Nap 6126 is a division of '0.30 acres of land into 4 parcels within the R- 1- 20,000 zone located an the northwest corner of Klusman and Whiriaway. Approval was given on June 11, 1980 by the Planning Commission with the condi- tion that the applicartE adjust the line of lots 2 and 3 to meet minimum zoning ordinance requirements. This approval expires on December 11, 1981. Attached is a letter dated November 19, 1981 from the developer requesting a six -month time extension for recordation of Parcel Map 5126. He has stated that engineering drawings have been prepared and maybe submitted when extension is granted. RECOMMENDATION: Ic is recommended tha` a six -month extension of z7me be granted and such extension, to expire on June 11, 1982. I ly subm Ated, LBH Attachments ITEM B i i RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING THE EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 5126 WHEREAS, an application has been filed for a time extension for the above - described project, pursuant to Section 1.401.11.2 of Ordinance 28 -8, the Subdivision Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission hd5 held a duly advertised public hearing for the above- described project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above - described tentative Parcel Map. SECT :ON 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: A. That extermI physical conditions have caused delay it. the start of construction. B. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent of the Zoning Code. C. That the c:•ant",ng of said time extensions xiiT not bp detrimental to the public t:ealth, safety, or wel- fare, or materially injurious to properties or im- prvements in tfie vi :inity. SECTION 2: The Rancho G camonga Planning Commission hereby grants a time extension for the at.)ve- described project ds follows: Parcel Map 5'.26 Expiration Date 6/11/CZ APPROVED ;ND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DA:' JF JANUARY, 1982. PLANNING COMMISSION THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeff rev ifing, Chairman ATTEST. eCret_' of the Planning Commission 0 D n I . 1' _ � v November 19, 1981 City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga PO Boat 793 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Parcel Map 5126 Gentlemen: Please consider processinc* a six- ..,cnth time extension for the subject parcel maY. We have enclosed the req•.xed $62 fee. J tJC1 fi Our engineering drawings have been prepared and will be submitted for first plan check as soon as this extension has been granted. If you have any questions please contact our engineer, R. C. Gilbert at (714) 995 -7144. X'heir mailing address is . Gilbert Engineering 4552 Lincoln Ave. *201 press, CA 90630 Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Thomas Stephenson Owner/ Subdividor y r L^ J .q1 .• K] 4f � Resolution No. Page 2 I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commissio.. of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing kESOluti011 was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning of C,immissior, e CitY of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning th Commission held on the 13th day of January, 1982. by the following vote- to-wit. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES. COMMISSIONERS: ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: I C.IV "I I V C• PARCEL. MAP NO 51e-o'b IN Tr E C TY OF RAW CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNAmwo STATE OF CALIFORNIA ® I 2 kcQ' T+ = %ZT& Ow.t � ;1pypL°�cGTtou 22,'717..wtSlatP s. Ra: 4 6V t: _-7wQs- rs„di�s�zNCa�zovao*neu�1, :uzuc c�.3.rrvo: snu'a.-�raaNO,s-r�cccau�aw -�O. LMZ _..00•� �_R. emu— '� T` O •STVa_s.�M.; ff .— +Gan•b. S<..r oOC.2S �t.or.wrri ^ 'nG.7u:�.•SO..� TMAl40p C�iGLL IJ�'.l• e• -MY. yuN¢�u44pL.T ` � C _ IW QO Z•.�iCSs rl, a � Y r�� t p �r � _ Feo _ �� _ _ E_ "�,.` nea LOT I 44 NORTH =y._ ` G+• �� ..'ice. 00 2'.:•- 1 ^M. 1 �f c s s m a C.• • . : � tin - mat -pTOVG °SN'- .LWUio j I •i r V YI f IT-r ' CSI' � CICVO �A rT;: AI\CI Tnu. Sim rlan PLtUN 'NI, DI'%rGOV E E — CTM'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONG l STAFF REPORT DATE: January 13, 19P,2 TO: Planning Commission FRONT: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Paul A. Rougeau, Senior.Civil Engineer SUBJECT: REVISION TO TENTATIVE YgACT 11605 - KIBANK A change from - 6 um : con — do niw'rt eve opment of 6C lots to a unit development of 79 lots located at the southwest corm: of Base Line and Hellman. This tentative tract was approves: bL, she Commission as a total develo{ment of 65 units on Decem:.er 22, 1980. since that time, the developer has fosnd, .s indicated in his letter, that proceeding wit., the protest would be ;aiced by �.6anging the map to a 70 lnt configuration. This change affects the cap only :And results in no change whatever to thF protect itself. i The City's subdivision ordinance -equires Planning Commission ayprovai of all increases in lot number, however, so this is ba'ng presented to you fcr your review and approval to -i9ght. The developer ha, paid administrative fees for processing the change and has als- paid the fees for the four new lot-,. RECOMNc'1CATION: It iF recommendec that the revision to the tentative map be approved and if the Commission agrees, a resolution has been prepared providing fcr the change and rerL"ning the original conditions of approval and envirornnen- tal clearance. Respectfully submitted, Lgi? :P1�-jaa Attachments ITEM C 1e�yj RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING GOMMISSTON OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA.., CA.LIFOWA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING REVISED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 11605 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 11605, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Nubank, Inc., applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the re.l property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Countv of Sass Bernardino, State of California, described as a Planned Development of 65 condominiums on 6.4 acres of land, zoned for R -3, located at the southwest corner of Hellman Avenue and Rise Line Road into 70 'ots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on January 13, 1982; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering Division Report; and WHERFPS, the Planning Cowission has read and considered the Engineering Division Report. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve. as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following find4ngs in regard to Tentative Tract No. 11605 and the Map thereof: 0 0 (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative trace_ is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of deve,- opmert proposed; (d) The des;gn of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 0 0 Resolution No. Page 2 (g) The environmental impact findings in Resolution No. 80 -89 apply to this map. SECTION 2: The Conditions of Approval contained in Resolution No. 80-89 sFaM —apply to this map. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1982. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA $Y: Jeffrey ;ing, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, anc adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at 9 regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of January, 1982, by the following vote - to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: C. J. OUEYREL Pit joiNT UCCHMM LAND "*Vwvcn ANACAL ENGINEERING CO. ENGINEERCNG AND SURVEYING POCT BOX 3668 222 EAST LINCOLN VA ENUE��ANAHCUA. CALIFORNIA 82eth PHONE (714) 774 -1763 December 16, 1981 City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Suite "C" Rancho Cua_monga, CA 917C1 Attn: Honorable Planning Commission Ref: Tentative Tract No. 11605 Dear Sir: Due to bonding requirements imposed by the Department of Real Estate, we are requesting phasing of the common area as shown on enclosed map. The first phase construction will be Area "A'', gi•een belt and recre- ation area along with model lots 1 through 4. Although area "F" (Co=on access area) will be constructed along with the model lots it will not be required that this area be bonded since the model lots will not be sold until the final phase. The remainder of phasing will be as follows: Phase 2 Area "B" Lots 10 through 29 Phase 3 Area "C" Lots 30 through 42 Phase 4 Area "D" Lots 43 through 54 Lots 51 throug_* 65 Lots 5 through 9 Phase 5 Area "E" (constructed with models) Lots 55 through 6o Lots 1 through 4 (models) Your help in this matter will be greatly appreciated. Very truly yours, ANACAL ENGINEERING COMPANY C.J. C t--( Z"YQuey);el: '. CJQ: sh enc: "a urt • v�" ! �:� :__�' - •. -- ° .-ya � `6 �.« -. , «. a ••�_- ... -' /�I a ii n `� r/ '., r .` . (••.. -- •�i,l h T:. �•__ � �. -�_ —�i "^ ..... '. �• � 1 _ � r ��, / is 13 ig a .1 - Y ,• 1:.. ,J] ••6�A I_ = `'• a :i i � .1 IL. t ''rf{ .�� _� . '. � -+ �, i� - - '+r� i` •i••:, iii _I/ •. i - � ci �, - .. •, i \ '��� _' S is )llfi ,I jl art v' --•. •:':,•re'..iJ :^ �' � �• •. � \l. � -" _ � 6' / / _• '/ / - LIZ ]'L,t:f:fpn! :.I: i'::j i^ i _.` �.. ; _ 1•.• �- �: � `y ' 1�'�.` -� .. � � /SS• ../ 4i , .I, tl .v _ '� <` • .tom -'— / �kc Eli . i'a•a1� fl!{ t:r �..I �` - r ` S•- �`,. ��r \(\/ Er E1 Inn; � �,r ���,�� . \_ �,• • � � � F�. ,..} is ' . -;, 1 _ !�>✓ , •% ���- _ - ti �` _= it . —�� � � • -"L: l � -•� ''' � / %': / /�/ /Ly ; r ���;,�iti��tr N ir'��u`r�1 h','•�r;'t��a' S r a— _. .'I. ') •. -J .. / i'••� ><' I • / s a�`I�'/y� 1: Tt f �•� . v./l.�:Y)� ` . ".i J - !.�..y / j/ '' �i � / / � / ."3� L�� ,'I . � '�,r (` : 'W 1 . T. fi� i t �" y ai Nirif,l ii. i iF ,.if 2 � k,i+ji l.vl+i; i wi i ,•i �l �fki ;!' ;ii4 1g±1ilft{f ,� 4�s b i t;t } l .. ;; p {'�•�u•'f'pf 7 'N , • ''. ��" _ - %�. asp at•+)+•2 („Eft .6'1 Nf :• I ^ r; _ `r E / .� �,���j : i i �t itl i di': t:`:�� !3' j itltii:�)f if c.,_ . • ,s. 7• / . I • ;�' , i�,`i.,141ii `.i! ,.:L •t ., t 1. ••rtn, i .a +t, ,i' / / /l /// i� IL �t T S[E•�`�4eIq �� CIA E�`�1fit ji i}k t• •} yf slag •• �� _ }4 _ _/: , �,. i •' t + 3 u i:i;. i=L:f; •.}'�f.��.t,f S ::n7 e • �'l • �` ' -r \��, j ,� tf y i-•i to �l•,•V` !'f'ii : tt }�i�� }I 1, _-,AAONQ, PLAN YY1Cal epootem" c4 r'. , „•� /. A _` +TRACE Na 11605 d u t i 0 0 El CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 13, 1982 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSM .T AND ZONE CHANGE N0. 81 -0 - 1 MWI LS - Request for a c ange of zone t rom R-1- UUU and K -1 -1% air to R- 1- 30,000 for approximately 46 acres of land, generally located on the north side of Almond, between Sapphire and Turquoise - APN 200 - 061 -12, 200 - 051 -06, and 1061- 172 -03. SUMMARY: This zone change was originally presented to the Commission and acted upon for only a portion of Tentative Tract No. 10210. The original change of zone dealt with only a 14 acre portion on the east side of the tract. At the direction of City Council, the zone change is being neard again to consider a change of zone for the entire area within. Tract 10210 to an R -1- 30,000 category. The Commission is re- viewing this for consideration of recommending approval of the change of zone and a Negative Declaration to the City Council. ANALYSIS: Tertative Tract 10210, Exhibit "B ", has been tentatively approved by the °lanning Commission contingent upon a change of zone. The appiicant f led a change of zone for the eastern portion of the site which was previously zoned R -1 -14 acres. After the Commission held a hearing for the zone change request to R -1- 20,000, the Council requested the Commission to reconsider that designation for larger lots to prevent further subdivisions. The request now is for a change of zone for tFe entire tract to an R -1- 30,000 category - This would permit single family residences on minimum 30,000 square foct lots. The General Plan designates this area as Hillside Residential. Based upon environmental studies that were previously provided by the applicant on the Tentative Tract Map, the 30,000 zone designation would appropriately implement the intent and purpose of the Hillside Residential category of Lhe General Plan. ITEM D Zone Change 81 -Oi /Lawlor Planning Commission Agenda January 13, 1982 Page 2 The Commission has discussed on several occasions that the area north of this tract would require larger lots than what was approved for Tract 10210. An appropriate zone designation for this northern area will have to be deter- mined during processing of that Tentative Tract Map. Appropriate studies will have to be conducted to determine the appropriate lot sizes in accor- dance with such environmental factors as drainage, grades, and earthquake faults. CORRESPONDENCE: A Notice of Public Hearing was placed in The Daily Report newspaper and such notices were mailed by certified mail to property owners within 300' of the subject property. To date we have received no new corres- pondence relative to the new zone designation. Previously, under the old request for ar R- i- 20,000 zone designation, we had received written objections from Mr. Morgan, who owns property adjacent to the east boundary of the tract. RECOMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to consider all public comments and input on this project. Should the Commission find this consistent with applicable plans and Ordi- nances, then a Resolution recommending approval of the c:iange of zone to the City Council is attached for your review. Respectfully submitted, r: JACK LAM, AICP Director of Community Development JL: MV: j r Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "8" - Tentative Tract Map Resolution of Approval CITY or RANCHO CLTCATNZO�.CA PLANNING DiVOON tentative map 1 TRACT NO 10210 ,r aKCr : a a atttiz r i I t 1 ITr -N1: 70-1 E F fiFl t NO- �i-D I Tm.c,: IrT 10210 t \tifI31T: __per SCALE it 0 RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF DIE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDIfi APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO. 81 -01 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE ZONING FROM P. -1- 20,000 & R -1 -14 ACRES TO R -1- 30,000 FOR 46 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ALMOND, BETWEEN SAPPHIRE AND TURQUOISE - APR 200 - 061 -12, 200 -051- 06, AND 1061 - 172 -03 WHEREAS, on the 13th day of January, 1982, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECT:ON*I: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the follow:n —g endings: 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed zone in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and 2. That the proposed zone change would not have signifi- cant impact on the environment nor the surrounding ® properties; and 3. That the proposed zone change is in conformance with the existing and proposed General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this pro— t will not crcatt a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on January 13, 1982. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: I. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 13th day of January, 1982, Zone Change No. 81 -01. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Zone Change No. 81 -01. 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and re- lated material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. Resolution No. Page 2 APPRUED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1982. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO C'JCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Ranchc Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of R -incho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of January, 1982, by the following vote - to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CrrY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFT REPORT DATE: January 13, 1982 TO: Members of the Planning Commission I FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development BY: Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. tr: 8T-T8 - JASKA - The development of a contractor's office and yard with two buildings totaling 12,795 square feet on 3.5 acres of land in the General Industrial /Rail Served category located at 9460 Lucas Ranch Road - APN 210- 013 -02. SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting review and approval for the development of a contractor's office and yard as described above. The project has completed the Development and Design Review process and is now before the Planning Commission for their review and approval. Staff has prepared a detailed Staff Report, related Resolution and Con- ditions of Approval for your review and consideration. BACKGROUND: The applicant, Martin Jaska, Incorporated, is requesting apps t their proposal to develop a contractor's yard with a 4836 C foot office building and a 7959 square foot maintenance build- ing. The 3.5 acre site is located on the west side of LL_as earth Road at 5th Street (Exhibit "A "). The site is designated as General Industrial /Rail Served (Subarea 5) in the Industrial Specific Plan and on the General Plan. A recent amendment to the Industrial Specific Plan allows this use in Subarea 5 with a Conditional Use Permit subject to the reriew and approval of the Planning Commission. The project site is presently vacant with no buildings, trees or sig- nificant vegetation. The site slopes from the north to the south at approximately 13�%. Land adjacent to the site on the north and east is presently vacant. To the south is a variety of industrial uses located on both sides of Lucas Ranch Road. To the west, across an AT3SF railroad spur,is the Crescent Business Center fronting on Archibald and within the Industrial Park category. ANALYSIS• The project site is adequate in size and shape to accom- modate the proposed use as shown on the Development Plan (Exhibit "B"). All building setbacks, landscaped areas, and parking requirements have been designe:i and provided in accordance with the Industrial Specific Plan, City Standards, and Ordinances. p.. ITEM E CUP 81- 18 /Jaska Planning Commission Agenda January 13, 1982 Page 2 Access to the site is provided by one GD' driveway off of Lucas Ranch Road. AC paving will be provided from the driveway up to and around the maintenance building. The remainder of the yard wiil be a slag base. Parking is pro- vided both inside the yard and along the street frov:tage. Twenty percent of the required parking will be for compact c..rs. Motorcycle and bicycle parking will also be provided in accordance with tFe !:.dustrial Specific Plan. An 8' decorative block wall will be provided on the east side of the yard to screen the view into the yard from Lucas Ranch Road. On the north, south, and west sides of the yard a 6' high concrete block wall is planned for screen- ing purposes. The west wall will be constructed outside tte ATBSF easement to allow for future rail served buildings adjacent to the site. Also, a view - obstructing sliding gate will be provided across the driveway at the entrance to the yard. Staff recommends that undulating turf mounding be provided in front of the 8' decorative wail to reduce the visual impact of its height as seen from the street grade. Details of the gate design and landscaping treat- ment along the 8' block wall will be submitted with the final Landscape and Irrigation F;ane,, subject to the approval of the Planning Division. The Design Review Committee reviewed this project and recommended approval of the design with the understanding that emphasis be given to the land- scaped area along the street frontage and in front of the 8' decorative block wail. The elevations and sections of both buildings are shown on Exhibits "C ", "9 ", and "E ". Exterior materials of the office building will consist of bronze vision - reflective glass and concrete tilt -up walls with a textured form finish. The concrete columns will be 16" square and mounding will abut the building on the three sides visible from the street. The main- tenance wilding will have an Armco Steelox fascia and two 3 "X6" reveal bands wrapping around the upper portions of the building. Colored renderings and a Site Plan will be available for your review at the Planning Commission meeting. A Conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan has been submitted and reviewed by the Grading Committee. Their approval required that the ridge line, as seen in Exhibit "A ", be moved further to the west so that development of this site will not increase the amount of runoff that currently flows toward the sol+th- west corner. Acceptance of drainage from property to the north was also re- quired. Part I of the Initial Study, as completed by the applicant, is provided for your review and consideration. Staff has completed Part II of the Environ- mental Assessment and found no adverse impacts on the environment as a result of this project. If the Cononiss;on concurs with such findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order. 0 CUP 81- 18 /Jaska Planning Commission Agenda January 13, 1982 Page `s CORRESPONDENCE: A public hearing was advertised in The Dail Report newspaper on January 1, 1982, and eight public hearing notices were sent to surrounding property owners within 300' of the project site. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to consider all matters relative to this project. If the Commission concurs with the CUP findings, adoption of the attached Resolution with recommended Conditions of Approval would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, JACK LAM, AICP Director of Community Development JL:CJ: jr Attachments: Exhibit "A" - natural F- atures & Grading Plan Exhibit "B" - Letailed Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Office Building Elevations (2 Sheets) Exhibit "D" - Mechanical building Elevations Exhibit "E" - Building Sections Initial Study, Part I Resolution of Approval with Conditions y ki , 9 0 •Y NATURAL FEATURES M GRADING MAP .. {f (� ? �1J NOhTH CITY Or TIT -NI- RANCHO CUCAMONGA , 17 L E: 4?W tea, , s�, -,,, -� PLANNING DIVISION F ,141r:rr_ A .Ar r r L CITY or ® RANCHO CUCAMONGA llNr-w DI« G M D 'i { G M D Ji is I A• .I t d.I,�.7 7 L,d,1 i; �1 t �.r �pr1 Wr aa. ml. 4.f0 1wr I ��•w>MVS r a.�l i�. I � : �,• � �I: I. 't i��l '� ��.I dt �R �!�•��;tC ,':�,,.I. 'r.�: ti�I a.: G�� .'' Vii' � �.� ,� .. t A... ^. -.:yy� - _ �_ _��.�,.'�._rii�.� �-qF.w .e.'•'�r".^3lsyMx �.�J ...r+ • :L ��i t- iTri r r1— r _ �L : •. +��' { r1: , �::.� i S •�_. \/.1'7J1 �r�1 �iL'YII' r0 CITY OF _F-_ .. PLANNING DIN%rGON EXHIml�= C- SCALE' I f.s . r, yrt 1. 3.11 r!. CITY OF RANCHO CUICAIMONYGA PLAINNING DIVISM A=I- ILI 1. 3.11 r!. CITY OF RANCHO CUICAIMONYGA PLAINNING DIVISM A=I- k C :x" A dti.. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DlNgSIO.I 'Va 4m"-Io� - - 3 ��a ITE3'I: ♦w I y 1 T +' TITLE: E�CI3IBi'I': T� SGLE -mil.'¢ � �t r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DlNgSIO.I 'Va 4m"-Io� - - 3 ��a ITE3'I: ♦w I y 1 T +' TITLE: E�CI3IBi'I': T� SGLE -mil.'¢ � 4- S J" CITY OF r RANCHO MC.NIVIONGA PLANNING DI rIRON 1 1 m„Ilyr. w � a .tar Y- �I.rrr . NrY�i Y� �.M - `:7it(Y� �.� psi '�•• -�� ..� • I y.�l �ji T. v. 'L•tVM'T d, ��/ 1� ]lbw '� �� � -- 1 _ J" CITY OF r RANCHO MC.NIVIONGA PLANNING DI rIRON CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM09GA INITIAL STUDY PROJECT IL'FtZRF,AT.ON Sr_ac - To be co_nplet_ ? by applicant Environsental ?assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be ccmoletec and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where t.-,e' Project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff wil? prepare Part II of tae Initial Study. The Development Reviv.r COmTlittve will meet a.-.d take action no later than ter. (10) days before the public meeting at which tame the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three deter., nations: 1) The project will have no significant environmental iipact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) the project wril have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant givi -;l further information concerning the pronosed project. An APPLICAICT'g MAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHO1,7E: Martin J. Jaska, Inc. L791 A,-.-..., u..-- Montclair_ CA 7"4- 626 -2446 WL%1E, ADDRESS, TELEPT-iONE OF PERSOV TO BE Cp?%'TACTED CONCERNING TIEUS PROJECT: Juan Baires 1ZSl Ar n' , • Mt�n•rla.- -- 91763 - IOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AIM ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) 9460 Lucas Ranch Rd., Rancho Cucamonga, CA LIZ OTL-i°„R PER. +JTS Nz-CESSARY FROM LOCAL, R:CGIONAL, STATE ADID FEDERAL AGENCIES AND TIM AGENCY ISSUIriiG SUCH PERMITS: _Building Department; fire department; engineering department 0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Building ccnr_ractor's office and maintenance buildings ACREAGE: OF PROJECT A --REA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AIJD PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ARTY: 3_S an lnr DESCRIBE THE EN=IRO N'�`?*TTAL SETTING OF TEE FROCECT SITE INCLUD=G INFORrM9TION 02%7 TOPOGRAPHY, PLADTTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HIS'T'ORICAL OR SCEPTIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCi212TION 01 ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSPRY SAS) : Vacant lot without any environmental imnact tea; - iT Gimme tt—r wtm . ob mme oz -hail - HC2=92= maJVC 11 71! 1v�_ 1=10.2 I-Znc5- a Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series- of cum:lative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental iAaact? No - , 0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Building ccnr_ractor's office and maintenance buildings ACREAGE: OF PROJECT A --REA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AIJD PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ARTY: 3_S an lnr DESCRIBE THE EN=IRO N'�`?*TTAL SETTING OF TEE FROCECT SITE INCLUD=G INFORrM9TION 02%7 TOPOGRAPHY, PLADTTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HIS'T'ORICAL OR SCEPTIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCi212TION 01 ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSPRY SAS) : Vacant lot without any environmental imnact tea; - iT Gimme tt—r wtm . ob mme oz -hail - HC2=92= maJVC 11 71! 1v�_ 1=10.2 I-Znc5- a Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series- of cum:lative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental iAaact? No - WILT, THTS PROJECT: YES NO x I. Create a substantial change in ground contours? x 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? x 3. Create a substantial change in demand ?or municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.). X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations- x 5: Remove any existing trees? How many? X_ 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, fiammables or explosives? Explanation of ary YES answers above: IMPORTANT: If the proje %t in-,rolves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attaches exhibits present the data and info_ - oration required for this initial evaluation to the i+est Of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presanted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and ; >liet°. I further understand tlP-t additional information may be required'•to..be snbmitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by ,Lthe- D�veiopment Review Committee_ •� ; Ik \t Date December 4 1981 3 --� � Signature `tiCZ�an`Baires Title ?raiect "4azar RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO C'JCAM09GA PLANNING COMMISSION APPRaVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 81 -18 FOR A CONTRACTOR'S OFFICE AND YARD LOCATED AT 9450 LUCAS RANCH ROAD IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL /RAIL SERVED ZONE WHEREAS, on the 12th day of December, 1981, a complete application was filed by Martin Jaska, Inc. for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 13th day of January, 1982, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described project. NON, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Pian, and the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed; and 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements In the vicinity; and 3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on January 13, 1982. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 81 -18 is approved subject to the following conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. Undulatino turf mounding shall abut the 8' tti.gh decorative block wail to reduce the visual impact of its height. Details of the mounding shall be submitted with the landscape and irrigation plans subject to Planning Division approval, prior to ?; issuance of building permits. Resc%tion No. Page 2 2. Details of the view obstructing gate at the entrance to the yard shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. 3. The landscaped area along the street frontage shall be mounded and significantly landscaped_ Consideration shall be given to a drought tolerant landscape design. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1982. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK. LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing ResolJtion was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the rianning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of January_ 1W, by the following vote- to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: G1 .yY.' 0 r 1 W Y a L Y � L � • V V V x Na 5:<-o � C o V` q C - w Y ccJ � V >f r G J •f .9 r r � i i- O a J� • w � �= 4 r y p 4x aV0 i �1 < OYN.w9 Cyy O qV4 i^ 7�� qq > L t t w Y_ � � 9 O V = V Y q �• i O V w+ C r r q q 6 �� < C � 4 '✓ 4 ^ ° r 9 N •�i.� V p 9 O L r p ✓^ L.V•.<_9 7 C -VA �O O ° NC�Y '1 .^ V.�SL w JZ Ord "J L'Y VrOV ✓ V1 Cqw VV = Np A. q �^' ^q>.�p OTI;L V �L V C Iyr � V 6 w+• Y 'i �T� C p N r -Vu L 4 �� VJ C � �C6 C w° A C q w� l � C O. P J A� C N •L.• y C rl ✓i � 9V°'6 ✓ rL 9 a �O � ►GVL °•.Try N V. V =V OJO✓6C qYr ^ `V S° �^ V w x• �l TJ Lq C Y _ ✓ a �. gr` � P pY v x w L°y y.`NVV L PT Vrr ��Y.N� y.q .n V L J V xfr� p _ L� O L A. Pr yY" C M ^ ✓ V ` a B Y O pY O✓ N Y _ Y\ L L✓ A ^ Z w y r A Y L V q _l L p= l •p p `yC y N 14i. tl >• L `c x � CY CL d aL �r� L.iY°' _ ` Y f V T N L OL L_ a N q < _° W ✓} .�. � x^ C Cp L O Zr L V Z C a ✓V C N 9 Y N CW L L O C Y = b P a N L N J w pp A^ C f P A N eO V C Z p� L C .`V 6 y q •� •GC L q w �P 4�G'O L � �V�� � C u G�✓ i V q Or UO VC ` YCq ` j •L^ J V� x - AY O 9° =N !_O r.C.�VL _EYa.N AG ^OOr a �r•4.r V V _ ✓�! V L � ` 'JY VC G OC�r� V �a q <b xr �__ t` LC` x C rI V1 •n P� CV YY _rC !p N✓ pp VI - �� ° C°C V L O q V V A TO a� w w q 9 b �• 4 O i ' ` � L r C V y Y✓ Y L _ }" CV C C_ V( - V `- {.^ a� N y 6 = w Ery T ° _ Cq 4 V a A V L J+ V V V O L r r 'yxyO PVy- V r N_ Y YI E• r r 8 A V •-- V x✓ 4y9 M 4 Vpr1 N N" Y V O xr 6� •i1Y !w N Q O L W�V)L r3 L'p t� ✓ C aY� L _` i N !» W� Vrw6° j L r W N T r `•O?` x• r L 4 w } � d 4 V q O •x r N N N N N N N w m � V ' ^ OV I r ° `p V C � r ✓ p N •'• O S � �r ° �e Yar L° N =�r x J » 4� y °� r 4 IJ ��• a `V q _E .-.Z= � E p ii o L'd 4r'a �`o >� $" p- �N•o v yE Y M C 0 rm a - " ✓ q_ L V - 1 �_ a9 ° O_V Y L� a � = 'pw . V�° i 6 I^ 0 9 L= � = V✓ _� N G y_O •r Y� ✓t• O= V »C C` N ^°` V l N P l°. 2u xl°.L Nq q� V VC w C q 44 S 9 ° S _ 4 V w Y - 2 L .. ` A gq O i O O q wx Y ALA }>� c .a .2% A a r F jrV. a V - >° C �d Sit ..r p 0 0 p NVa O I a -� ^ � V C >• a 0 mgr l ` S .� 4g - y j� 4� y V, y >� r M" £ � ` �s w� OVC �pO Va+• �r Y pN V C CO + 1 C LCY• ^x YN 0 W Cy = 9P> L6 Aa 0' O -C �} 'JN ✓pd C O� M �Y • y4�0 oqy-- CO xY' $ a•vY • Y �i eg� 4i : emu..... c 2.t ar} cc pc pp x4 OPi C V20 Ol G� n 99� V4 r•..•} ap ^± arcqc V y_C L a 9 C C L. Z Yp C= Z E r 9 > Y La ✓ °Y Y ` Y ✓ C✓ G- .x E- O w V - 4 y _.. VV ` R = OI°VO O` M `✓x °w r V•V•Y �N NL P9 .3i•• ✓� �4� � +l ^8 = �'� R 4 �C ✓Y Y-G Y•> tV < -9 Y ✓r <Yi <O xLil <M MV•rL `N V w G «• = cq (`.c L �• e � °G• o �• � �.� ate_ � Q q V 4 C q .°.. V ✓ •r r q L `_ ° ✓ ..�• r L g r J w C T V •Lw • •r C O � O - T p L `^ y ^• V q y w°i A uu ya 4 •° C0 q 7L b Fr LVO .4 Y^� V°w L. qq r ` � °d �^Y LV L✓ �' OOV °GNCr n4 � � V �W L rT t•r « ~V qA .ir.G b ✓q Y $'_O —° �•o .°.r r •9ir -= P� Val � Lr_•�r.•y�GW j y .Li 9 C .^• € Li«i b x L L r V V r r : ±° 5 ° _ E> + 7 r ✓ q q [l q C Ty Vy r V q V°• ° � J P ' � y^ y °1 •,n 4 4 47c 4 FiY 6C. r•� �« _ _ NI �q �= Oi ^" V ✓Cwq�ai 0'C L p GG I�hr .L,: � � V.`p. p� e,v$ M � ✓q $ h 1 :.`> e4 �.' I� .`. ` o-�° -`•�i �' N 4 VOA �L �� � � � N N O v � I w p r r�C�•�� 4�� r Nw— �N4 `O.< �i p p ; ✓O✓ ✓t V O� y V V�w�q ✓C4 oy v MI4 r vc4: Cyr O _ 4CV •Vn�° 0G • .°J_ = V � ✓ is L ypNp�•4 P ✓ 9�NGLL.' q V� r N4 IY yL^ Yl= CN✓ �f J f Y4 C q�� ACV C rvN NY `0 =4x 'v'� 6 O �� ° °ce obc « =g �� ` °ro 4a�w'O qC� Y✓O O ✓�y 4 w N•`'q 2 �( 4�v04VO4 _Nr (•y �« PP•6 or T.- C+ q F_ 4i _ 9L✓ ::,4 '° _rc _�� •-"o> E �.'« + o✓R �c qq qy =err _ Nc 4Tp G m V V� ].1'ir C 6 O V yV 9 V q O •GI V P N4 LL q<GY >N ayr I�'Cw <w N�� C —T •J L6 6� 04 Gw G w�V 16 >q ✓ ~I — NO Y rV S�N04 1 o W ° � a ^ ✓� O d L L P ter. LE °:.°• .4i o$L4N$ _g w«q•^ c Noega' ^P �.�_ _ 7-5— N Lr •r C l• L > q) ^ 6 y L V d V q Y Y V d� d C4Y d L{y.0 �J M�t 2. r .. _9 VL NY r�V _VP ryV +FL ''•O �L r QgiT 00_� �rw w� 6 _ n � D ^r_O •D_N _ fj C LVN1^ Y R ` y ° �� y V•✓ ✓ e l C O V � w C N Y° V L V` �V b T yoY � dVrLy L_> L4L ✓p Vq PO C«irS Vr W ✓✓ _P✓ N NO q p MV � «r pO pNVP�O PAY O•_ Vii C�>•LN 4r� LEI �• ✓p yL 4 O Cr L •` r ✓^ ✓ n.V N �� C BYO NN L >E J «O Ta ✓= wL yM V � � 4 C `• t M Cq O a�r�pp C F C L L Y _ O q _ g V C L✓ + T C r V •O� iwL w L +L.L•Lq O ✓•C FN _N rPL V__b� w0_ ..q. �_ C C � � � L �VV4 w. VV �r6 Dui O✓ L aYi�c cv C_ P�VO 6 q^ T_4 C✓ C•�C L� �e veO�PCOy� VCO a` r _ �✓ a L J L q OqJ Pq L M V e± _ 6_ V 9 L 0.51 q � V N Q M t q N N W C o _` r O.Ny WGW yp r_ 2 N V V q V r r C C L ✓+ 4 wl •.r ✓ iL ��.yiL 6✓ Lp �q v•yi.Vi4r pq.Yi ViL: += 4�w n _ C °'4 ✓` Y _6 .4VL0 4 Y. L.Gei 01L _N OVi_L d q08 C {i✓C ^ > �[ cC p iC SC L�Or O4N °�6L 1 T_✓ OQ iq q .Lw CM Z O q e —�S L +� 4'L ).'N ,n pP_l g0 iq L.i .L.� •�O .d.Y° _v. —" 4ei+ �� I 2 +r 4 O w y p= cv d •^p 4 f y pi r � C y_ Y Y •. 'w p� Y p� 0 6� w y� ��_ a Y + O y C N •Zi 0 V O < C 9 V g✓ L P :n) == C C N N V g ✓^ _M wd r _ VN_ ^.. 6✓ 4_ O ! ✓•LSO Js L ✓ C_q+ +Y_ Vr CY+ qty OOM q8L V L44-`_�N LVw q VR� G > N ✓CV N�i2 4U SS °1 N_O_ PgQ4 C ✓rpL� ✓CC VTgeN OlV qY COO.O ✓ -OOC NqC `>• V� Y v .Y.• C O Z2 -Z O)�?.qC. rt.. C 4w yV ��:�VC_VG •..NC V N P N w r ^ ` y q V �— _ C O L C y Y ='..g9 ° Ta�a :N" cP GX . g ZN �.o° aYi O•► 4 V V •� y q Y _ Y Y ✓ e `q C C Y q c N o r YLN= _ _ Y 1_L 46q> Vr Lp�i9VY� YOR�Y C_ �O NqC ^•J ^�JC • VO•L < L O •� >'«°. a�N � KMQLVO� � L i ✓ Y+q V _Y`E LN Wt ° G !p W4 VPrr0 NavN !wP 60 <PLC «H4�Od <1C.0& HZ N O rl Y O 6 G _ - w P• E _ r �N� •• Vp 1CG � u ° Y• � yV� VV�C 0p rP1 3 i O VIG GO GOB fir' °YYI r� i r� G C V ! P r I V L ✓w•v, b E P PfaV W � Y °u +° V •.� ~S �^ . V Ln 1 1 M p I 4v yip V � 00 O O O = Vt°l cV °w '.O^ y` �_� i�T W aw 9vi PV_ P W'�wV r r✓ Ni r N �� V V D O r � °Y C4N ✓L r � • POO V � T w r E C i0 O C +Y rO Y O LV Y V P_C W Y I N y V T✓ V ` ^ q Y °L 'w6 :•e °bP 2 o I v �Zi t o.°.° j ':.Y. [r�� L c`Sv �no�.0 ^V J aLld q9t Epp � �- � Kwa Onr� `°.r �TVV _Y. y ✓Cb =r r L ) ` 6= ` y w V i LIE i M G + T C L C n V p ZI °Z O ✓ �• 9 tl V q d= �• P� ^ C Y T�° l r O ) V .n ! r � f C C W ° ' �n� L= e� »Lr v w_L IVrGO w ✓� .5. ��. �rw.^iw Gq ✓r✓ q I �itL. Y V w L n 4 J Y ° r• q V CO O 4 V p p C 4 0 9 Z.. V � In ` L' Y C V W S µ W Iwr a M q t_` v I .rrr �_ M L V p 4 P \I i v 4 0 .^ _ .0 V V V M cl G � 2:° =4 y C � CYnIr ° E L M O L � ~ O G ` O V L•= L M P n d w Y• O o w P r �/ 0 p4 rL � Ire c wL � NlJ�G v i �Iyy ✓i t Y O O(�! IY W =V O r rV � � ^ d9 'r uY �.• <.O� V' '4` NO NG t ✓L Y �f'A 7 �'�V !!V •p6 vLw Y 4'� =I =NE YO 9~ b Lq � +2 ✓U a_ Oq � �` qOL v_qq� E ✓L L 4I. LVV V y MV�� N� �W° N Y ✓V �vLL� COtl qc V0v � W t y Cwp [aV O.° G �N� SEE VV9 V � 0z B� VLIr rV VS V= L° ✓p p! q ^ „ ✓ MZ Y O v T Pr 6 q n > V L V L C 8+°I 6 qv rY �4 C PV Y U LrLppY V 'J q V O Y�C O�•I` L + V_ 9 r v� w w P ' L p PCP -�- Iw0 N ` �dV +VYi HOC PVr r�•.�(IFE C J ` C 6 •• 6 •N,e GO y >O Yl �VtlV �Y =fw� � OVO NO✓ < L CY p � 6 Wq^• ti O•+ Gup Yw •r�> 4•N OG N q� A� L L' q+ V w I!a PO V 9� < J C •r 3 .Vr C � L D+ V r ,Yy °pp I V UmVV <N <� �LL•J M t • G v Q Y y� VO O� V <s VVV Sr N C { np O I z r V y E V ° wp N C G w In Cwc �q C 4 R J^ c O r9 w N V ^T!p C V = d w V w' O+ V E N G b _ T • ^ w 6 !• _ 0_w YV Y �t �J CyO tiN CO_Inr �l 7 > ; p J ° �Er ±�ON VL� b✓�J blw rSb� I� rC _C O° OV VC Ir '•V^ �Y + +✓ L „ C+ Ii1 P V O..yn `r0 P+ r V ppqqY i IVn V� Y YEN L l i5 II� V r- 2 O L y L r q Y 4 <VI'r V� ^ C° ✓ V O, r Y• V✓ N Y r VY �• L V L r r' Y0444 r V ` �4/ w r V _Y V gq�yq V �Y C Y r I� r pC YP Iw V� °C�w ✓wqC SC p• _ S 5.2 5� �• 2�:,tN lr `N �V�i�✓ VSO O R ✓° VNOY LO E W yC IS V V � q V W CC•VrV R }\ y r _ L M ^ ]4 ✓ M L G r V g v 1 V I'C) ~` Y C � >Iw Y Y w q yrON! VY L�rV = ts q W d_ ✓ � ° _ Y Cy M1 ^wb � )pT� � V W eyy In Y ✓ 7 = Y LCD C O o 7_ 4V �°IO 14 r° Y —YpV •O L L I°r ✓Y Cl Y� E-- V r r ^j � Vpp 9 0 0 E YYV O i N C L r N BFI L W YN C LIr 0 E O V r �, q p OV O T k Lz s N O rV ✓p q�prObN CY+ V C(¢ ✓' O +InY y'r�P l �o VVY °l (V'O•. a_p C.0 V P ✓ °Y C 9 O �.'q 6 L wV. C+ (I (¢ V V V !OJ •L+ C <l Y p •V� ! 16{ L r f V M Y C _ 1 Y y N rl N W Y C ^Gq°4TOr'fV L VO ✓Iw �L _UEP r ✓W01 + 3 yC° 1:2 q r°• C+ V� :E` V ^Q L i✓ kE lyQ, t°. �V (�_C �w _`° +qr p ° v f� v <✓ V r 6 +^ O Y��' C C L + O Z •^ q C O r p Y J= D A S Y v N C _rp E l qI y� yI �• N v ' r_y}I c a O C O Or Ce O VVVY� 4 1r4 MO V E 2 4 E C Y O e ° w VO v. ✓v `V✓N��EV CrIV.I OV yY OLOIi1 O GVO yCrYw O�ry VY OC 4+ i _ y L r q� w __ G = 0✓ �_Y.°.IG V V Y S LL_gIC C O !f � O�-J Y Vur V Y 1'y+ ny ^q �� iwM TV qM +VyVYE pi N Tyyy`/ = m r II >.Y�� O OM VvI TF C Vl�w rZ MZr it Cp +rIY q +glil L BIZ P!q I^iIV E e N MC L ✓ O4P�C O C "S 'VC F• V ✓ M NL r OL LW N �' V V q 9° O p C C0 S°.Y J SV� _ r- T v • 22- O z V0 ° a SF C O —, 0. + V .N 3 =9Vr'i V'G +Q O Y a tDY J C IuY`OY LrI•• Lr L�rr YV V Vpgl/ ✓` ✓ yy LOS RLI���IViG Y'•V•CVr N•. Oq0 p 41n w� ppOpO N^ L p c p y� 6V V4V N Oy <OO ✓ N 6Y WIV Wr T a V Y. �VI O ✓I N N N Iw N n t C� m x w o. Yg L .D e O N° O VV O N n W yV POV wx Y c L ' 6 C G J z° 0 L ° n S C' T P 1 W ou L L 4 � Q r C r 1 �d t.^ ^ V Nv C V y a r.°. V L O w M .w. V V t V ✓, v r V o� xr r C L O. N Y r 'Y i` = 6 C 7 i 4 E ` r l ;z< C i V 9 Y L� V YC N V L N V W� 4 w V P y6 9 V yl 6 e W V ]1 v S �V 1 ^ O ` 6 V N ;"t L = V 9 .M L L� L N C w' zg� ✓ -L `V P _ L- w L V ^ � Y L• iw pSY Ca4 L V �✓ V -IN 7 $ v� Y O VN tir �: V� V�`d'✓ a -R ` M •e � V_ 4N ZZ Zz 32 ✓rCC:VVV111 w V✓� N r L L V 5 V Vp Lc t 6�° n V 4 .L. iJaO��i 0. x ^` WO .r Tr�hr�L V c y N ~ L M C r Z w O L1-0 .•C. V✓ A y M L 61 u ..c O e _8d 90� ePiL �Y��`jj• Lu -d y o v a ` V � ✓ Y^ c E Y = Y - a2. C^ 0 1 L ° a= P Zr d C O T V C 8 x E Z2 O .O G ` i y v O ` O < r r r N I. I� C O 1 V � V ` W I V r �O 4 4 ZdC^ O r N i Y.\ �Wf V ° O J t ✓OO q {� i K V q T .W. q�rc N o f O ✓ W t p V p < a r • w V L 40 ✓VL _ _O. w 0 L V Lai zOV 0.K �.� V ✓» .wn !OP 4VO� W.. w L. V VxN WV r C G rCYG. 0 L ar 0 V w Z 2 V P z ` o v WW y Y � Y >O Y _ � � r V - O ✓ c Z p Y e �y l qSC _a C v w0 oZ vL" L wi. oV vNO 2V � ^l t - 6.✓v �C � Cc Y C ✓ ° ✓.2 V. W cC L l• V V C r ✓V O 4N V n� V L «r �.. ✓ 4�GLC 8< y P. _- ^ `writ N� w q 72 r ✓ V M C r rr W VL _pV V w 4 C 4 V 'L' O � n•r o`Yrw pV iG. rppJ�� V r= � C CC p ^^O V S V IV pp_ pp < cV w s x t q N V 6 V V O. Y _N w 8 C� m x w o. Yg L .D e O N° O VV O N n W yV POV wx Y c L ' 6 C G J z° 0 L ° n S C' T P 1 W ou L L 4 � Q r C r 1 �d t.^ ^ V Nv C V y a r.°. V L O w M .w. V V t V ✓, v r V o� xr r C L O. N Y r 'Y i` = 6 C 7 i 4 E ` r l ;z< C i V 9 Y L� V YC N V L N V W� 4 w V P y6 9 V yl 6 e W V ]1 v S �V 1 ^ O ` 6 V N ;"t L = V 9 .M L L� L N C w' zg� ✓ -L `V P _ L- w L V ^ � Y L• iw pSY Ca4 L V �✓ V -IN 7 $ v� Y O VN tir �: V� V�`d'✓ a -R ` M •e � V_ 4N ZZ Zz 32 ✓rCC:VVV111 w V✓� N r L L V 5 V Vp Lc t 6�° n V 4 .L. iJaO��i 0. x ^` WO .r Tr�hr�L V c y N ~ L M C r Z w O L1-0 .•C. V✓ A y M L 61 u ..c O e _8d 90� ePiL �Y��`jj• Lu -d y o v a ` V � ✓ Y^ c E Y = Y - a2. C^ 0 1 L ° a= P Zr d C O T V C 8 x E Z2 O .O G ` i y v O ` O < r r r N I. I� C O V ` W I V r �O ZdC^ V V r - i Y.\ �Wf 6� i O J t ✓OO q {� i K V q T .W. q�rc N o O ✓ W t p V �� w a r • w V L 40 ✓VL _ C C S Y a w l v O L C C P Y V I� w V C 9 V O 4 v V - P OW O � - N �e v 90� ,a Y Jww Y Y t 0 •� L rY°.. Y L � V Y. L `ve t V r( O i V N O C y w= ✓ a G V c ^ V L ° V (' Y u V _v N Y P V w t _Z i L ^ Y V Y_ L 9 .Y+ 6 t J O i P Y 7 i r v c 4� C V a _ 9� N q (I l l � O. L � C w i� t - r O C r Y V// L 4V P � W TV 4q V a� ^ e b 4^ V i � P L � N a P r K O r V n L Z ° r 8 V V L L Y � o v � L 7 L N 4r O ✓ i T� � w L q Pr r � ` V r T N C 9 O � c N O 9 W i2 O� os Dr d� Z M V WL q R V V q y�Yr 4 � Q V c < ✓ V r YTy ZdC^ V V r - i Y.\ �Wf 6� i t ✓OO q {� i V` V q T O V Cr q�rc N o O ✓ S E✓ t p V �� w • w V L 40 ✓VL _ _O. w 0 L V Lai zOV 0.K �.� V ✓» .wn !OP 4VO� W.. yr L O_ V VxN WV r C G rCYG. ar 0 i w Z 2 V P w V WW y Y Y >O Y y � � r V — E$ Z col. e _ V q l qSC C v w0 oZ vL" oV vNO 2V � - 6.✓v �C � c Y ✓.2 cC L r C O iVCrf ZyN. aVO ^O. «r `VVpW 4�GLC 8< _ wr L `writ < q 72 r ✓ V M C r rr W VL _pV V w 4 C 4 a9V O w C �i V a `L pV iG. p ^^O V Cz pp_ pp < cV w s x t q N V 6 V V O. V _N w 8 ' N b _✓ P C _w r L V Npr p� OO- �V Br ^ O.r WrV Q 0 1.0 0 ! 5 \ \ Islt - . \ - � - ( \� k .3 � - x ` : ! \ \ % ■&f! }� k � � � 0 1.0 0 ! 5 !c ) c . \s o �) \{ k ![ �i 2\ < f 0 1.0 0 A DATE: TO: CI'i Y OF RANCHO CUCAbdONGA. STAFF REPORT January i3, 19;2 Members of `he Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SJBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 7230 - THE ROBERT " MAYE RA" - A residential su ivision of �2 acres 7R 3ocated on the southeast cov. sr of ..crow Rout-- and Turner Avenue - A.PN 290 -091 -5 R 6 INTRODUCTION: The Robert layer Corporation has submitted the a ove- re erenced tentative Parce Map to divide 17.2 acres into 2 par:els in correlation with Tentative Tract Map 11915 for the purpose o separating condo area from patio home area. Tentative Tract Mai 11915, submitted to the Pia:ming Department for tentative approv%I, is curre7tly being revised by the deven:.Ner. Townhouses, condo:, and pat'o homes are piannei for this "tract with constriction pl inned in phases as shown on the attached rnasing Plan. Off -site impr jve- ments will be constructed et time of Tract development. The existing Dmr Creek charmel is located on the east property dine. Surrounding properties are zoned for residential use. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: Als) attached for your review and consileraticm is Part I of the Initlal Study as completed by the applicant• staff has completes Part II of tn,! Initial Study, the Environmental C ecklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Upon completion avid r jiew of the Initial Study and fit1 d investigation. Staff found no si lnificant adverse impacts on the env±:nnment as a result of the proposed ubdivision. i RECOMMEROAT:uN: It is recom ended that the Tentative Map be app loved, subject to the City Engineer's Report, and that a Negative Decl tration be issued. A Resolution is attached to provide for approval shiuld the Commission concur. Respectfully subm tied, � i LU:5 :jr Attachmo : N ITEM F J RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 7280 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 7280) LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TURNER AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 7280, submitted by The Robert Mayer Corporation and consisting of 2 parcels, located on the southeast corner of Turner a -enue and Arrow Route, being a division of a portion of 1/2 of Southeast 1/4 of Section 1/4 of Section 11, T. 1 S R. 7 W., San Bernardino Meridian; and WHEREAS, on November 18, 1981, a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above - described tentative map; and WHEREAS, on January 13, 1982, the Planning Commission he duly advertised public hearing for the above - described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: the following findings have been made: That the map is consistent with the proposed General Plan. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the proposed General Plan. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse enviro menul impacts and a Negative Declaration is issued on January 13, 1982. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 7280 is approved subject to the conditions of the City Engineer's Report pertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13Th DAY OF PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA M Resolutior. No. Paae 2 ® BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTFST- Secretary cf the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of January, 1982, by the following vote - to -wit: AYES: C"ISSIGNERS. NOES: COWIISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT 40 FILED BY: The Robert Mayer Corporation TENTATIVE MAP NO. 7280 LOCATION: Southe 4t corner of Turrer Avenue DATE FILED:ii /18/81 and Arrow Route NUMBER OF LOTS: 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portion of 1/2 of southeast of RECEIPT NUMBER: 1/4 of Section 11, T.I.S.. R7W, S.B.M. FEE: $273.00 ZONE:—R-1 TE74TATIVE MAP PREPARED BY: Southwest Engineering GROSS ACREAGE: 17.2 ADDRESS: 9953 S_ Pullmar. Street MINIMUM LOT AREA: Santa Ana. CA 92705 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: RECORD OWNER(S) ADDRESS PHONE The Robert Mayer Corp. 8121 East Florence 213/927 -3341 Downey, CA REPORT OF THE CITY ENGINEER Dedications 1. Dedication by final map of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. X_ 2. Dedication by final map of the following missing rights -of -way on the following streets: 4 additional feet on Turner Avenue 20 additional feet on Arrow Route additional feet on 94' Corner P/L radius require on Arrow, Turner ano' 26th St— Other 3. Rights of vehicu ar access shall be limited as fol ows- 4. Street vacation required for: 5. Master Plan of Streets revision required or: 6. The following perimeter intersections require realignment as follows: RCE 20 TENTATIVE MAP 140. 7280 Page 2 ® Lien Agreement Improvements (NHZKi Xis requi red pri or to ® Recording for median - island ) E3 Building permit for Bonding required prior to building permits for Lots l & -2 sf me'Its _ 7. Construct full street improvements (including curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, one drive approach per lot, parkway trees and street lights) on all interior streets. .1! 8. Construct the following missing improvements on the following streets: �•inrlt.�iinn innat,rnnin0 anti irrioation on meter STREET NA 11E CURB & IA.C. GJTTER PVMT. SIDE- WALK J DR.VE APPR. ST TREES ILIGHTS STREET MEDIAN ISLAND" OTHER X 4 x x lien X x x x X x x x 9. ConSLruct all storm. drain and drainage structures as shown on the tentative map, or as required by the City Engineer. x 10. Provide all utility services to each lot including sanitary sewers, water, electric power, gas, telephone and cable television.conduit. All utilities are to Le underground. x_11. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. X_ 12. Install appropriate street name signs and traffic control signs with loca- tions and types approved by the City Engineer. y_ 13. Developer is to provide all construction plans for drainage and street im- provements. Such plans shall meet approval of the City Engineer. x 14. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. x 15. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cuca, -nonga shail be decorative poles with underground service. lG. The following existing streets being torn up by new services will require an A.C. overlay: 17. The following specific dimensions, i.e., cup -•e -sac radius, street section widths) are rot approved: _ 18. The folloi7nng existing streets are substandard: They will require: Approvals and Fees 19. T:is subdivision snall be subject to conditions of approval from CALTRANSI San Bernardino County Flood Contrcl District. X 20. Approvals have not been secured front all utilities and other interested agen- cies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. RCE 20 TENTATIVE MAP q0. ]ZQ Page 3 21. Permits from other agencies will be required as f�ilows: A. Caltrans, for: -_ B. City:_ _ C. County Dust Abatement District: D. D.I.S. Trenching Permit if any trenches am. over 5' deep: E. Cucamonga County Water District: F. Other: Map Control. 22. If only a portion of this Map is recorded, adjustments shall be Trade to pro- vide for taro -way traffic and parking on all affected streets. _ 23. The following lots appear to be substandard in either frontage, depth or area and should be corrected on the final map: X 24. All corner 'lots shall have a corner radius at the right-of -way ine in7 accord- ance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga standards. 25. A Parcel Map shall be recorded prior to the first phase subdivision to prevent the creation of an unrecognized parcel located _ 26. The boundary of the Tentative Map needs clarification as follows: 27. The border shall be shorn to centerline of existing perimeter streets, or title explanation required- Parcel Map Waiver 0 _ 28. Information submitted at the time of application is / is not sufficient to support the issuance• of a waiver of Parcel Map Certificate, according to requ°rements of the State Map Act and local ordinances. and Drainage Floodl,Control (Bonding is required prior to Z3 Recording for ) U Building permit for both parses I X 29. proposed subdivision fails within those areas indicated as subject to flood- ing under the National Flood Insurance Program. This subdivision will be subject to the provisions of that program and Ordinance No. 24. 30. A drainage channel and/or flood protection wall along the entire north pro - .:rty line may be required to divert sheet runoff to streets. Such flow may be required to go under sidewalks through culverts. _ 31. IT Such surface is above top of curb, 30" walls shall be required at the back of the sidewalk at all downstream curb returns. _ 32. Culverts required to be constructed across streets at following locations: _ 33. Broad scale hydrologic studies will, be required to assess i-mpac o -increased runoff. X 34. Private drainage easements for cross lot drainage shall be required and shall 40 be noticed on final map. PCE 20 TENTATIVE MAP NO.. = J4isceilaneous Page 4 y_ 35. Dust abatement will be made a condition of issuance of the grading permit for this project. 36. Noise impact on this project will be mitigated in accordance with the Planning Division report on subject property. 37. This property is not within the present City Boundary and will require annexation. _38- All information required to be shown on the tentative map is not shown as re- quired: X 39. Proper grading and erosion control, including the preventation of sedimenta- tion or damage to offsite property shall be provided for as required. 40. A preliminary soils report will not be required for this site for the follow- ing reasons: A copy of the soils report furnished to the Building Division prior to grading will be furnished to the Engineering Division. 41. The filing of -he tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that .i_ sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued urciess saia certification is received in writing. i- 42. The City Engineer shall make the determination, in accordance with Section 66436(C)(1) of the Subdivision Map Act, that division and development of tNbe property will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercis,': of any public entity or public utility right -of -way or easement and the sigra- ture of any such public entity or public utility may be omitted from the final map unless the City is notified in writing of any objection to said deter.nina- tion within the specified time limits of said Section. y_ 43. At the time of Final Map submittal, the following shall be submitted: Traverse calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and/ or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. . Development shall be limited to one drive approach per street. Plultipie lots —44. fronting on a single street shall use common drive ap roaches at lot lines. X 45. No construction will be permitted within Army Corps ov Engineers temporary easement for Deer Creek until it is released by them. X 46. Improvement Certificate listing future improvement to be installed shall be noticed on parcel map. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM.ONGA LLOYD B. HUMS CITY ENGINEER By: .i TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 7280 L.fY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA.COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA_ FOA1gM M 1n OF Tti 114 OF 3EC710" 11. T. 1 iN. T W- 82J t T 1• IN- v : ti� A Pin r' j ' i l . l •r • � rrr ►mod �� 7 .. c=,f FJuI. to v�• ovomm / oevelwe.c 11w •orwrr.a,cserl.a It j� I .. w+rrarw.�iw or l-- ,..,....... f XzngTIIIO �Mp FAOFOOEp a.ww uw_ vmcu .b ..n. rr••rr•• .r• i o•••. •o,n•�rsrr�o� ff •�w��.••rr•rs I i I ,- VKMWrVAM LAMVV� J_ ,,, ��Tat�+o•,t Ca �- • W.c.�'cw..ere.. u. F•+se b UL,I T:O� Cp y W. O.,M•�iT� ' J. O r0. f.Y YW.LW.O. •FrOF �j 1'r: ... j' • TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 7280 L.fY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA.COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA_ FOA1gM M 1n OF Tti 114 OF 3EC710" 11. T. 1 iN. T W- 82J t T 1• IN- v : ti� A Pin r' j ' i l . l •r • � rrr ►mod �� 7 .. c=,f FJuI. to v�• ovomm / oevelwe.c 11w •orwrr.a,cserl.a It j� I .. w+rrarw.�iw or l-- ,..,....... f XzngTIIIO �Mp FAOFOOEp a.ww uw_ vmcu .b ..n. rr••rr•• .r• i o•••. •o,n•�rsrr�o� ff •�w��.••rr•rs I i I ,- 11 VKMWrVAM LAMVV� J_ ,,, ��Tat�+o•,t Ca �- • W.c.�'cw..ere.. u. F•+se b UL,I T:O� Cp y W. O.,M•�iT� ' b CK./ O•� CO. O r0. f.Y YW.LW.O. •FrOF 11 1 w CO) le; 17 Mae± aim 1 •a r�a ep IC /f )1 Ii ! d CL i .CL W 5� mE Q Si ht -r—:w. - "Gy" �-ti•+_ �, '1' =' -ice. I -.. a -•^%' env Q° _ �. r [�- 'T''_4 L !i ` � ti r .+ r - ' 1r ��1 if f �..:.+�L. •.^ � Ilr � � � � yr I�` i i r✓s..r�y�r�J.� vi••,A m �rJ� --". i 1i.. 'T —`iT —� I� iT 1 %.•-711 �w j� 7�' +^!:`!Rfe� J L•.�v : 'r,+tl.• ^rr I!� -� = ��ar• --� Y. S f�: r WLI I ; ';-'� ,—: •. _ � C ,r+r 1 I * p...' (1•'r.?'.�? � �- I .,,If II j Mt-n+� � � ` i �: ._ uj lit ji LU' 1 � ��. i.'.a- _. ----. � C �.� � + ,•.—i r� —, �' =.._� 'i . ^ e ...—': i_ i -,� r j�j�'a ZQ Y.r ,rw Z rt �_.. r.J p °�� -�i�,I II(��.,`.,;�A'?•. L� I!' I 'y ' I I ��' Ir ���1{1.�� �� �� r-;�. 1 � . q . 12; ~.n is �''• r-1� - _s"" � �!' ��t� - � I.J. C) i.:l - a -- r .A _.'�•i .ter i r�`�-' i�t -A�� � � __� r 1 ` ` �" •l.v.- .- �- ..��.1. �'�b' �_ .F.2 � —,"�:, —fir.." c 1 z J,� r r _ I ` J LU LUI I 1' � 1..•2 .1 .—JLI r � ;...�y �+ �.Y .J � i. (1i '' r 1 t • L l i CITY OF RANCRO CUCAMONGA INITIAL SM--DY r D� , „ . . r .. i .- 1:101 PART I - PRr)JECT INMP.MATION SHEET - To be completed by appkicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee:; $87,00 7.T7 . -- .__ For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review committee through the department where the project application is made_ Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Ccnunittee will meet and take action na later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Co.^mittee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project wail have no sicnifbcant environmental irmact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project wiil have a sionificart'environmentai impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prerareu, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant g "ving further information concerning the pronosed project. i PROJECT TITLE_ Lol��v� D«�� APPLICAN'T'S — NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE= �QS$ S p:.yliifyc� �jq/ Ain �d 92 °0� 7:P- 2P8o NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: eon%/ /•afS4A+aG / _4r 40W-01_ Ei=_ LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO -) ':9k Zo9 Ap '* s_ i,'C 0�i _ LIST OTHER PM1ITS NECESSARY FRAM IACAT., REGIONAL, STATE AMID' FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PER?4ITS: 11�egG - Z -t .0 K4i r PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Lof alf:�4 ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 17 76',4e-- DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORVATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDn4G PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): ' (/i�'yiaid Sui.Rw..a i�f f�v �Atriiic,r lJ� %'�:.✓t.i���L Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series - of cumslative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? rt. :_ __� WILL THIS PPOSECT: YES NO 1. Create a substantial chanca in ground contours? 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? 3. Create a sub_:tartial cha,_ae in demand frr municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc_)° 4_ Create chang_z iL the existing zoning or general plan designations? 5- Remove any existing trees? How many? _ 6: Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: WO IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CWRTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and infor=tion presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief_ I i-arther understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaulativn can be made by the .Development Review Committee. Date_ �/� */ Signature %3 Title - G= FESIDENTInL COASTi ICTIO^' The following inforn tion sho`,3.d be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamor:ga Planning Division it order to a-d in assessing the ability of the senool district to accommodate the proposed residential development. ,"me of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Specific Location. of Project: PHASE I PHASE 2 F---17'SZ 3 PEASE 4 TOTAL 1. Number of single far..ils Units: 2. Number of multiple family units: 3�Date prcposed to n. begi ccnstruction: 4. Earliest =ate of occ_cancr- I,odel s ' and a of Tentative S. Bedrooms Price Rance n LJ 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT: 1 DATE: January 13, 1982 TO: Planning Commission sROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: ENVIR0Ni;VjTAL ASSESSMENT AND ►'i+TL M4P 7244 - 1E55tNbLY GUmr;LNI - J%n Inaustind. -wveIUparcuL, vt 41.56 acres into 13 lots located on the tw th side of Foothill, east of Maple Place - APN - 208- 351 -03. INTRODUCTION: This subdivision dividing 41.56 acres of land into 13 lots for office /industrial use is a portion of the Daon Project located at the south- east corner of Foothill Blvd. and Haven Avenue. Elm Avenue, Maple Place and Foothill Blvd. have been constructed leaving the interior streets to be construct- ed witi: this project. A conceptuai site plan showing possible development of the lots is attached for your review. Each iot will be subject to further review prior to development but all public improvements necessary for orderly development will b require- *7 ments for the parcel asap. VCF � Lots 1 2, 9 and 10 which �.&a?R frontace of antler '�nl tPO -- --- -- P e 2 n use rives. No access N711 be allowed ;m Foothi'.1 Blvd. The lot sizes vary rro mj mmum of 2.0 acres to a maximum of 6.1 acres wi most being between 2 and 3 acres. All lot sizes comply with the Industrial Specific Plan, subareas 7 and 8, which state a minimum of 2 acres on Foothill Blvd. and a mini- mum of . acre and 1/2 acre lots on interior streets. The developer has no plans for rail service use at this time, however, there is an existing railroad at the east property line whicz: could be utilized at time of development of individual parcels. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the tentative map be approved, subject tc the City ngineer's Report and that a Negative Declaration be issued. A resolu- tion is attached to provide for approval should the Commission concur. Respectfully submitted, LBH:SK:jaa Attachments ITEM G RESOLUTION NO. A RE;iiLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 7244 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 7244) LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, NORTH OF ARROW ROUTE AND WEST OF THE SANTA FE RIGHT -OF -WAY WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 7244, submitted by The Messenger Company and consisting of 13 parcels, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, north of Arrow Route and west of the Santa Fe right of -way, being a division of Lot 27 of Parcel Map 6206 as recorded in San Bernardino County, State of California; and WHEREAS, on November 25, 1981, a formal application w,:s submitted requesting review of the above- described tentative map; and WHEREAS, on January 13, 1982, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above - described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION. RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the foilowirg findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed sub- division is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improve- ments will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse enviro- e�tal impacts and a Negative Declaration is issued on January 13, 1982. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 7244 is approved subject to the conditions of the City Engineer's Report pertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1982. 7-:...... _...y . _.._... . 9 40 11 �s ■ Resolution No. Page 2 PLANNING COMMISSION Crr THE CITY OF F XCHO CUCAMONGA BY: e rey m rg, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Cc mrission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planting Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that ' ie foregoing Resolution was duly and regularl introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the Ci�, of Rancho ;.ucamonga. at a regular meeting of the Planning Comr,a ssion held on the 13tn o;ay cf January, 1982, by the foliowing vote - to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NUS: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: i I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM0NGA CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FILED BY: The M_ssenoer Comnanv TENTATIi'E MAP NO. 7244 LOCATION: North _of Arrow. South side of Foothill DATE FILED: 11/25/81 West side of A.T &S.F. 14UMBER OF LOTS: 13 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 27 of Parcel Mao 6206 RECEIPT NUMBER: FEE: $186.00 ZONE: office /industr=sl * * * * t fr 1r * !r � * yr x 7r Ye �t * x 4r * t ,t i * it 1r ,t * ,t 1F ,k !r 7r tt ,t R +t .. !r * * * +t •. TENTATIVE MAP PREPARED BY: E. L. Pearson & Assoc. GROSS ACREAGE: 41.56 ADDRESS:_ 3g ;s Birch St. MINIMUM LOT AREA: Newport Bach. CA 9266 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: RECORD OWNER(S) ADDRESS PHONE € ThP Mpssenger Company 2501 A'. ±on Avenue 714/957 -3225 Irvine, CA 92714 REPORT OF THE CITY ENGINEER Dedications X 1. Dedication by final map of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. 2. Dedication by final map of the following missing rights -of -way on the following strel-ts: additional feet on additional Feet on additional feet on _ Corner P/L radius required on Other x_ 3. Rights of vehicular access shall be limited as follows: Foothill 'Blvd. contia�o_+�c to tie oarcei boundary 4. Street vacation required far: S. Master Plan of Streets revision required for: 6. The fcllowing perimeter intersections require realignment as follows: RCE 20 TENTATIVE MAP NO. 7;44 Page 2 Improvements (Bonding is required prior to 2 Recording for all parcels 0 Building permit for ) 7. Construct full street improvements (including curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, ane drive approach per lot, parkway trees and street lights) on all interior struts. 8. Construct the following missing improvements on the following streets: *includinq land caoing and irri ation on meter STREET NAME CURB & I G•JTTEP. A.C. PVMT. SIDE - WALK DRIVE I APPR. STREET ISTREET ITREES ILIGHTS MEDIAN ISLAND* OTHER Foothill r lien agr ement i — 9. Construe: all storm drain and drainage structures as shown on the tentative map, or as required by the City Engineer. _ 10. Provide all utility services to each lot including sanitary sewers, water, electric power. gas, teiephone and cable televisiort.conduit. All utilities are to be undergrou-id. _ 11. Developer- shall coorcinate. and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or -.ther existij-,g p!rblic utilities as necessary. X 12. Install appropriate street name signs and traffic curttr•ui sigf;s wiLh loca- tions and types approved by the C;ty Engineer. _ 13. Developer is to provide all construction plans for drainage and street im- provements. Such plans snail meet approval of the City Engineer. n.. ..a... ..e- a_. 14. Sani;.ary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamon3.: District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. _ 15. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Svu=erre California Edison Company and the City of Rancho r=_�,unga shall be decorative poles with underqround service 16. The following existing ctrc::.b oeing torn up by -.sew services will rewire �n A .,:,...ay: 17. The ?-allowing specific dimensions, i.e., cul-de-sac radius, street section widths) are not approved: _ 18. The following existing streets are substandard: They will require: Approvals and Fees y_ 19. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of so�nxme�ra�ax�ms�cx�r .�t�yx�ee�cx�x�t. x_20. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities ties involved. Approval of the final map !-All be that may be receiveu from them. RCE 20 approval from CALTRANSI and other interested ages - subject to any requirements 28. Information submitted at the time -af apDiication is / is not sufficient to support the issuance of a waiver of Parcel Map Gertificzte, according to .Cqu- cements of the State Map Act and local ordinances. and drainage Flood Control ;Bonding is required prior to X; Recording for all parcels j D Building permit for ) 2 29. Proposed subdivision falls witnir those areas indicated as subject to flood- ing under the National Flood 7psurarce Program. This subdivision will be subject to the provisions of that program and Ordinance No. 24. Zone AO 30. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall along the entire north pro- perty line may be required to divert sheet runoff to streets. Such flow may be required to go under sidewalil.s through culverts. _ 3I_ :fi water surface is above top of curb, 30" wails shall be required at the back of the sidewalk at all downstream curb returns. 32. Culverts required to be constructed across streets at fol.owing locations:_ _ 33. Broad scale hydrologic studies w"17 a reoul:-e-d to assess impac of increased runoff. X 34. Storm drains shall be constructed on easements shown on tentative map. Design* shall eliminate right angle bends. Proposed storm drain across Lot 2 shall connect to existing storm drain system on Maple Place. Drainage easement across Lot i shall be private. RCE 20 TENTATIVE MAP NO. 7244 Page 3 Y_ 21. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: _ A. Caltrans, for: _ S. city: C. County Dust Abatement District: D. D.I.S. '�renching Permit if any trenches are over 5 deep: x E. Cucamonga County Water District: F. Other: Map Control 22. If only a portion of this Map is recorded, adjustments shall be made to pro- vide for two -way traffic and parking on all affected streets. _ 23. The following lots appear to be substandard in either frontage, depth or area and should be corrected on the final map: _ 24. All corner lots shall have a corner radius at the right--5?-way line in accord- ance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga standards. _ 25. A Parcel Map shall be recorded prior to the first phase subdivision to prevent the creation of an unrecognized parcel located 26. The boun,?ary of the Ten±acive Map needs c arification as follows, _ 27. The border sh?:i be shown to centerline of existing perim- ter streets, or title en'Adnation required. Parcel :ep Waiver is 28. Information submitted at the time -af apDiication is / is not sufficient to support the issuance of a waiver of Parcel Map Gertificzte, according to .Cqu- cements of the State Map Act and local ordinances. and drainage Flood Control ;Bonding is required prior to X; Recording for all parcels j D Building permit for ) 2 29. Proposed subdivision falls witnir those areas indicated as subject to flood- ing under the National Flood 7psurarce Program. This subdivision will be subject to the provisions of that program and Ordinance No. 24. Zone AO 30. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall along the entire north pro- perty line may be required to divert sheet runoff to streets. Such flow may be required to go under sidewalil.s through culverts. _ 3I_ :fi water surface is above top of curb, 30" wails shall be required at the back of the sidewalk at all downstream curb returns. 32. Culverts required to be constructed across streets at fol.owing locations:_ _ 33. Broad scale hydrologic studies w"17 a reoul:-e-d to assess impac of increased runoff. X 34. Storm drains shall be constructed on easements shown on tentative map. Design* shall eliminate right angle bends. Proposed storm drain across Lot 2 shall connect to existing storm drain system on Maple Place. Drainage easement across Lot i shall be private. RCE 20 9 Miscellaneous TENTATIVE MAP NO. 72 Page 4 _ 35. Dust abatement will be made a conditicn of issuance of the grading permit for this project. 36. Noise impact on this project will be mitigated in accordance with thr. Planning Division report on subject property. 37. This property is not within the present City Boundary and will res•ire annexation. _ 32. All information required to be shown on the tentative map is not shown as re- quired: y_ 39. Proper grading and erosion control, including the preventation of sedimerca- tion or damage to offsite property shall be provided for as required- -40. A preliminary soils report will not be required for this site for the f .)llow- ing reasons: A copy of the soils report furnished to the Building Division prior to grading will be furnished to the Engineering Division. _yam 41. The filina of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building pennies are requested. When building perrits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certific -tion is recei "ed in writing. y_ 42. The City Engineer shall make the determination, in accordance with Section 66436(C)(1) of the Subdivision Map Act, that division and development of the property will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exerrise ® of any public entity or public utility right- of- way'er easement and the signa- ture of any such public entity or public utility maj+be omitted from the final rap unless the City is notified in writing of any objection to said determina- tion within the specified time limits of said Section_ y_ 43. At the time of Final Map submittal, the following shall be submitted: Traverse calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and/ or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. " 44. Development shall be limited to one drive approach per street. Multiple lots fronting on a single street shall use common drive approaches at lot lines. X 45. Common drivLway and reciprocal access easement between Lots 1 and 2 and 9 and 10 shall be required and to be noticed on the map. X 46. Applicable portions of the conditions for Parcel Map 6206 shall also apply to this project. CITY OF RANCun CUCAMOr7GA LLOYD B. HUBBS CITY ENGINEER By: _ • V • L e . y a Y iY: � y• .IYM• � J e -ii.• :a -.3 1 L' L 3: i I t ff S33 �o jog F �5 BCSC Z r e Y w: m Y J n � JY- • . O Y i- i • Y O O o e c u J FL Y <.� 4 f� 0 z m• dC ` < z �I■ z Y �M < • r� O Q Y Z 0 O O i i �a e0 z16 L oJ` 0s 00 O Y z OF~< ze fm 2° r w- Y: ° Y Z t 2 0. �f! ?s 0 I ul !!, i 0 eE Rl U-, lT• LA Iowa T s: C5 �! 4 Oil Q�< V Q? !1m 7 �i T!F Oi ;;E M L71 k Q W Q J W a apC V N w C CC L" C Q <C 211�,yy Z LL N C W W< WJ H C O LL Cn INNERVii: > - O F• E s: C5 �! 4 Oil Q�< V Q? !1m 7 �i T!F Oi ;;E M L71 k Access and Circula-.ion 120' Right -of -Way Haven Foothill Milliken Day C-'P-.k 100' Right -of -Way Arrow Rochester Etiwarda 88' Right -o' -Way Cleveland 54' Right -of -Way All Local Streets 11 7WS7�� A median will be constructed to lines left turn mcvement from Haven, Foothill, and Milliken directly onto properties in Subarea 7. Minimum Parcel Size One (1) acre and two (2) acres on parcels adjacent to Frothill and Haven Setback Requiremen`; (measured from ultimate Haven Average Landscaping Parking face of curb) 45' ' Foothill 25 Milliken Oay Creek Arrow Rochester Etiwanda Cleveland All Other Local Streets ,A. !�'-I 35' 25' 24 ::1x, -#a SUBAREA 7 General Plan Designation Industrial Park Primary Function Subarea 7 occupies an area directly south of Foothill Boulevard which represents on important land use edge between the City's Industrial Area and community oriented non - industrial area and is a gateway to the City. There are few existing uses in Subarea 7. A major industrial, office, and commercial development on approximately 300 acres is currently undergoing a phase construction. Within this area is a.planned Civic Center including future San Bernardino Coninty and City offi css. Permitted Uses CUSt0M Manufacturing Light Manufacturing L:;ht Wholesale, Storage, Distribution Adm+zistrative and Office Building Maintenance Services Busii :ess Supply Retial Sales and Services Busine.;s Support Services Communic-ation Services Is Eating and Drinking Establishments Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Services Hotel /Motel Medical /Health Care Services Professional Services Administrative Civic Send ces Conditional Uses Automotive Rental Automotive /Light Truck Repair -Minor Automotive Sales Automotive Service Station Building Supplies and Sales Convenience Sales and Services Entertainment Fast Food Food and Beverage Sales Funeral and Crematory Services Personal Services Recreation Facilities Cultural Public Assembly Public Safety and Utility services Religious Assembly • IV -29 iz 40 Landscape Requi remeats 15% of Gross Site Area Performance PLquirements Noise: The maximum allowable exterior noise level of any use shall not exceed 65 Ldn as measured by any location on the lot occupied by se;ch uses. Where a structure is occupied by more than one use, the noise level shall not be in excess of 60 Ldn as measured within the interior space of the neighborhing establishment. Noise caused by motor vehicles are exemted from this standard. Vibration: All uses shall be so operated as not to generate vibration discernible without instru- Ments by the average person while or. or beyond the ..lot upon which the source is located or within an adjoining enclosed space if more than one establishment occupies a structure. Vibration caused by motor vehicles, trains, and temporary construction or demolition work is exempted from this standard. Particulate Matter and Air Contaminants: In addi iion to comp lance with the Air uality Azintenance District (AQMD) standards, all uses shail be operated so as not to emit particulate matter or air contaminants which are readily detectable without instruments by the average Person while on the lot containing such uses. Ddor: All uses shall be operated so as not to erm t matter causing unpleasant odors which are Perceptible to the average person while within or beyond the lot containing such uses. Elumidity, Heat and Glare: All uses shall be operated so as not to produce hur:idity, neat, glare, or high - intensity illumination which is perceptible without instruments by the average person while on or beyond the lot containing the use. Special Consideration Foothill Boulevard is a Projected to carry a s- In arterial X?aich 4c In order to limit vehicu7eriaccessol•l_ of traffic' minimum parcel size requirement alonroFoe�' the 2 acres because of the high visabili y along lthes Devore Freewa }. E. rs .. I. co LLI a) CC uj M z LLI LL Cl) .......... :5 -j la Zuj cru) W Z-J QlAr acc IN i3w uj:;[ w LCLCI t ZE § § } ƒ ƒ2� � - + + e � �$.� ��� � ) $.� |�� � E General Plan Designation SUBAREA 8 General Industrial Primary Function Subarea 8 extends north of Arrow approximately 1000' east of Cleveland to the east Plan boundary including a portion south of Arrow along the eastern p boundary. The area functions provide f. Seneral Industrial activities and to assure frr a transition area for the Heavy In- dis trial category. North of Arrow, west of Milliken, they industrial uses should be allowed to continue and expand with all service according to the development standards of the plan. Permitted Uses Custom Manufacturing Light Manufacturing Light Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution Agricultural Supplies ?nd Services Automotive /Light Trunk Repair -Minor AutomotivelTrc-_"ft' Repair -Major Building Contractors Services Building Maintenance Services Building Supplies and Sales Business Supply R_tail Sales and Services Business Support Services Communication Services Eating and Drinking Establishments Laundry Services Recreation Facilities Repair Services Administrative Civic Services Conditional Uses Medium Manufacturing Heavy Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution Administrative and Office Animal Care Automotive Fleet Storage Automotive Rental Automotive Service Station Convenience Sales and Services Entertainment Fast Food Financial, Irsurance and Real Estate Services Food and Beverage Sales Funeral and Crematory Service He,-.y Equipment Sales and Rentals Medical /Health Care Services Personal Services Petroleium Products Storage Public Assembly Public Safety and Utility Services Religious Assembly IV -33 Access and Cir:- ulation Minimum Parcel Size Setback Requirements (measured from ultimate face of curb) Landscaping Requirements Performance Requi reme,its 20' Right -of -Way Day Creek Blvd. Milliken 00' Right -of -Way Arrow Etiwanda Rochester 54' Right- of -k'ay One -half (k) acre Day Creek Boulevard Milliken Arrow Rochester Etiwanda All Other Local Streets All other local streets Average Landscaping Parking 45` 25' 15% of Gross Site Area 25' 15' LI c Noise: The maximum allowable noise level of any use shall not exceed 75 Ldn as measured at the lot line of the lot containing the use. Where a use occupies a lot abutting residentially zoned land, the noise level shall not exceed 65 Ldn as measured at the common lot line. Noise caused by motor vehicles and trains are exempted from this standard. IV-34 �y L Vibration: Al" uses shall be operated so as not to generate vibration discernible without instru- ments by the average persons beyond the ?n, upon which the source is located. Vibration caused motor vehicles, trains, and temporary construction or demolition is exempted from this standard. Particulate Matter and Air - ontarn nants: In addition to compliance with theAQM0 stand uses shall be operated so as not to emit particualte ratter or air contaminants which are readily detectable without instruments by the average person beyond any lot line of the lot containing such uses. Odor: All uses shall be operated so as not to emit matter causing unpleasant odors which are perceptible to the average person beyond any lot line of the lot containing such uses. Humidity, Heat and Glare: All uses shall be operated so as not to produce humidity, heat, glare cr high - intensity illumination which is perceptible without instruments by the average person beyond the lot line of any lot containing such uses. Special Consideration Due to the higher quality character of the adjacent Industrial Plan category for Medium Mapufacturing, building setback. from abutting prc-)erty within Sub- area 8 shall be no less than 45'. Both the potential park site location and fire station location are whosn to indicate approximate location. Development within 600' of the Devore Freeway shall have any outdoor storage areas completely screened from view along the freeway. Because of the existing rail service, users with rail service needs are permitted within the area west of Milliken Avenue. IV -35 0 F- L DATE: Janeiary 13, 1982 10: Planning Commission CITY OF RANCID CU MONGA STt " -W 1EP0RT FROM: Lloyd S. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, EngineerinC Technician SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AN3 PARCEL MAP 7214 R. Z. INDUSTRIAL COMPANY - An indu�tiral sutGivisioa of .4 acres into 2 icts located at the southeast_ corner of Milliken Avenue and Eighth Street - ?,PN 229- 261 -47. INTRODUCTION: R. C. Irdustrial has submitted Tentative Parcel divide 15.4 acres cf land within the M -2 zone into 2 parcels. Parcel Map 7218 is parcel 4 of recorded Parce Map 5760 and is subarea 10 of the Industrial Specific Plan. loth parcels are required parcel size of i acre for this subarea with parcel acres and parcel 2 containing 7.2 acres. Map 7218 to Tentative located in larger than th one containing 8.L Surrounding property is zone for industrial use. Development for parcel 2 was approved under D. R. 81 -27 in August 1981. A :onditional Certificate of Compl,- ance will be recorded to insure additional dedication on Milliken Avenue at such time as the width for the right -of -way for construction of the railroad overpass is determined. The need for future "A" and "B' streets will be addressed at the time of further subdivision o: development of parcel 1, since at xhis t:me the possibility exists that no extension of "B street will oe required. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: Also attached for i of the Initial Study as completed by the II of the Initial Study, the environmental investigation. Upon completion and review gatior., Staff found no significant adverse of the p- oposed subdivision. r� 9 r Iz youi review and consideration is Part applicant. Staff has completed Part chec ;list, and has conducted a field of the Initial Study and field investi- impa:ts on the environment as a result RECOMMENDATION: It it recommended that the ten ative map be approved, subject to the City - engineer's Report. and that a Negat ve Declaration be issued. A resolution: is attached to provide for approval should the Commission concur. lly submittec, I L'EH �fC: jaa Attachments -� ITEM H 0 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 7218 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 7218) LOCATED AT THE SOI.'THEAST CORNER. OF MILL?KEN AVENUE AND EIGHTH STREET WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 7218, submitted by R.C_ Industrial Company acid consisting of 2 parcels, located at the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Eighth Street, being a division of Parcel 4 of Parcel Map 5760, recorded in Book 54, pages 53 -56 of Parcel Maps, County of San Bernardino, State of California; and WHEREAS, on November 6, 1981, a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above- described tentative map; and WHEREAS, on January 13, 1982, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing fcr the above - described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLT.: AS FCLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the folliwing findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed sub- division is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivisi^ii and improve- ments will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: adverse environr.--ntal January 13, 1982. SECTION 3• subjec' to the condit thereto. That this pro.i--,t will not create significant impacts anti a Neoativa Declaration is issued on That Tentative Parcel Map No_ 7218 is approved ion-, of the City Engineer's Report pertaining APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 137H DAY OF JANUARY, 1982. E. 1] id ■ El E E Resolution No. Page 2 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITi OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Cha i r man ATTEST: secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commissio•, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly ar.d regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning :!oT=.:ssicn held ors the 13th day of January, 1982, ty the following vote - to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 07f ENGINEER'S REPORT 0 FILED BY: R_ C. Industrial Co. TENTATIVE MAP NO. 7218 ADDRESS: 602 S. Hilda LOCATION:_ SEC Milliken Avenue and Eiqhth Street DATE FILED: 11/6;81 NUMBER. OF LOTS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel 4 of Parcel Mao 5760 RFCEIPT NUMBER: FEE: $IR7.00 ZONE: m -2 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * > * * * * * TENTATIVE MAP PREPARED BY: Joseph Hyde GROSS ACRE"L =E: 15.4 7 ADDRESS: 602 S. Hilda Street Nliilrit'M LOT AREA: Anaheim, CA 92806 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: RECORD 04NER(S) ADDRESS PHONE f R. C. Industrial Co. _1301 Dove Street. Suite 760 714/752 -5515 Newport Beach. CA 9 %500 REPORT OF THE CITY ENGbIEER Dedications Dedication by final. -tap of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. X 2. Dedication by final map of the following missing rights -of -way on the following streets: 60 additional feet on Pittsburgh Avenue additional feet on additional feet on X_ Corner P/L radius required on Pittsbu oh Avenue Other X_ 3. Rights of verjicular access shall be limited as follows: Milliken Avenue - w .......... r- If -- - -1 I 4. Street vacation required for: 5. Master Plan of Streets revision required for: 6. The following perimeter intersections require realignment as fo'loas. x, RCE ZO qc TENTATIVE MA.D MO. 77'_1'.8 Dage 2 Improvements (Bonding is required prior to Q P% cording for Parcel map ) ❑ Building permit for 1 _ 7. Construct full street improvements (including curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk„ one drive approach per lot, parkway trees and street lights) on all interior st —eets. x 8. Const,,:ct the following missing improvements on the icllowing streets: a.a .. -,..a <.... l.- ...a.... �....... �..d ;,rinntinn nn motor STREET rlAME I CL'.. GUTTER PM. SIDE- WALK DRIVE AD ?R. STREET TREES STREET LIGHTS MEDIAN ISLAND" OTH Pit+ burgh X X x X x 9. Construct all storm drain and drainage structures as shown on the tentative :nap. or as required oy the City Engineer. x 10. Provide all utility services to each lot including sanitary sewe:-s, water, ® electric power, gas, telephone A11 utilities are to be underground- '11 - Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as nec ssary. _ 12. Install appropriate street name signs and traffic control signs with loca- tions and types approved by the City Engineer. X_ 13. Developer is to provide all construction olans for drainage and street im- provements_ Such plans s.iall meet approval of the City Engineer. X 14. Sar.ita:y sewer and water systems. shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standard_. P letter of acceptance is required. x 15. Street 'light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison ' ,)mpany and the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall be decorative poles with underg:und service. 15. The following ex.sting streets being torn up by new services will require an A.C. overlay: 17. The following speci ic— Tmemens»s, i.e., cu. -de -sac radius, street section widths) are not approved: 18. The following existing stre ets are substandard: They will require: Approvals and Fees _ 19. This suUivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CALTRANS/ San Bernardino County Flood Control District. X 20. Approvals have not been secured from all utilitieb and other interested ages= ties involved. Approval of the final map will he subject to any requirements that may be received from them. s Sr RCE 20 - TENTATIVE MAP NO. 7218 Page 3 Y Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: is _ A. Caltrans, for: B. City: - x C. County Dust Abatement District :prior to issuance of build — D. D.I.S. Trenching Permit if any trenches are over 5' jeep: C, can*nga County Water District: prior to issuance of bull .ii_ "•� �roaolitan Water District Mao Control _ 22_ If only a portion of this Map is recorded, adjustments shall be made to pro- vide for two -way traffic and parr -ing on all affected streets. _ 23. The following lots appear to be sub .3tandard in either frontage, depth or area and should be corrected on the final map: .y- 24_ A17 corner lots shall have a corner radius at the r gFt--o -way liFe in accord- ance with the City of Rancho Cucam')nga standards. _ 25_ A Parcel Map shall be recorded prior to the first phase subdivision to prevent the creation of an uprecognized parcel located _ 26. The boundary of the Tentative flap needs clarification as follows. _ 27. The border shall be snown to centerline of existing perimeter str'-ets, or title eyplanation required. Parcel Map Waiver _ 28. Information submitted at the time of application is / is not sufficient to support the issuance of a waiver of Parcel Map Certificate, according to requirements of the State Map Act and local ordinances. Flood Control (Bonding is required prior to ❑ Recording for ) ❑ Building perm5t for _y_ 29. Proposed subdivision falls within those areas indicated as subject to flood- ing under the National Flood Insurance Program. This subdivision will be subject_ to the previsions of that program and Ordinance No. 24. Zone AO 30. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall along the entire north pro- perty line may be required to divert sheet runoff to streets. Such flow may be required to go under sidewalks through culverts. 31. If water surface is atove top of curb, 30" walls shall be required at the back of the sidewalk at all downstream curb returns. _ 32. Culverts required to be constructed across streets at following locations :_ 33. Broad scale hydrologic studies will-ge—required to assess impact o•r increased runoff. I^' . RCE 20 ./R 11J TENTATIVE MAP N0. 7218 Mi scel l a.. 2ous Page 4 x_ 35. Dust abatement will be made a condition of issuance of the grading permit for this project. i_ 36. Noise impact on this project will be mitigated in accordartze with the Planning Division repc:-t on subject property. _ 37. This property is not within the present City Boundary and will require annexation. 38. All information required to be shown on the tentative map is not shown as re- quired: x 39. ropes er grading and erosion contro , zrc�ud ng the preventation of se@menta- tion or damage to offsite property shall LLe provided for as required. 40. A preliminary soils report w'll not be required for ttis site fcr the follow- ing reasons: A copy of the soils report furnished to the Building Division prior tc grading will be furnished to the Engineering Division. x_ 41. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that sexier treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. When building permits are requested, the Caramonea County 'dater District will be asked to certify the availability of 4:_paciiy. Permits will not be issuad unless said certification is received in writing. X 42. The City Engineer shall make the determination, in accordance with Section 66436(C)(1) of the Subdivision Map Act, that division and development of the property will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity or public utility wfight -of -way or easemnt and the signa- ture of any such public entity or public 0ility may be omitted from the final map unless the City is notified in writing of any vbjecti_on to said determina- tion within the specified time "imits of said Section. _` 43. At the time of Final Map submittal, the following ;hall be submitted: Traverse calculations (sheets), copies of rer ^wed maps and deeds used as reference and/ or showing original land division, tie notes and `each marks referenced. ' 44. Development shall be limited to one drive approach per street. Flultiple lots fronting on a single street shall use common drive approaches at lot lines. X 45. Additional dedication of right -of -way for future overcrossing of Milliken Avenue shall be required at the time of development of Parcel 1. A conditional Certificate of Compliance stating the above condition shall be recorded'con- current with the map. X 46. A lot 1fine adjustment to adjust the sootoerly parcel'-boundanj shall be recorded prior to reccrdation of the map. 'RCE 20 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LLOYD B. HUBBS CITY ENGINEER By: - -..- _ -- - -A" Swm S Or 1 SIIQT TEMUTIVE 'PARCEL MA-P 7218 s';41 www � ,. NO is= v ..44_ 1. 10its ft� Ulu 4c doccomillm I'm f. tnm M: nows"I+L N SG1K fcv' LAND USE= aiT Ill. mamma Wift 4!i•.'i�Ttl6L �1(fli SN'+�+�Gitt Ao (714; -55 t9tnu+11,1 aR+o to +� Su -SS+i eTTUnry. . Am": CUCM 6 m01Ur WTU OIST4117T mu: mcroNa mart• WTU OI:TNTCT 901411: SOUTHERN i1L1r0411R 1X33011 W. YY. SOUf1lRN qqrI 1rORNIR 441 Co. TpQldl[: +O[01L ttKw101R m. AGFicUL7URE ZONED: M Z n ; �� 4 ZzfFP-X 7M VK3ynTY YAP .H*HU, n z , 0 N LL1 1- V I Q til 67 a Z Q _7 RTIRiw won !x-R u. 117+.01• SR wASS Ot -c IN SOUTH to Or M HE.ST YIW 'TT4wT W A STUL GITmcR WIM +COOSS THE CT,Wbm n OOO m TROL P. 1.4 FE :T StOTN Of THE SOUTH am M.L. + R. !3VM OF W-11 UST W-] ST�T•K.,Ltof Ia NRfR. Mli90N 93 be 2.! !T. 4Qy 9RRC[L A. 4.2,11 +[M: ! T+R3. OR Incu NO. 1.1" am% TOT4 tf.a2l MIMI tt"L OLSCNI9110q- 9aRL ,1 Or wcXL w M. SILO 43 9p R ,1T HIM= IN W t St Or 9,1NZSL NRrs. 9RCL IS TO 1L.INf:LY21 K. am Wawa M TNSTRU4 T M. +1 -w7Tx. w n ; �� 4 ZzfFP-X 7M VK3ynTY YAP .H*HU, n z , 0 N LL1 1- V I Q til 67 a Z Q _7 0 CITY OF WUME0 CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT nN.- FORMATION SEEBT - To be completed by applicant Enviro.- smental Assessment Review Fee: f.87.00 For all projects recuirir_g environmental review, this Form must be completed and ssbmitted to the Development Review Committee through the department wrere the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Ccxsaittee will meet and take action no later than ten (13) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 2) The project will 'nave no significant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 31 An additional information report should be surplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the pronosed project. APPLICA.ti'T'S NME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: (714) 752 -5515 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PE:SON TO BE CONTACTED CONCEMNING THIS PROJECT= (714) 991- 8800 Joseph B Hyde PE , 602 Hilda St.,aane IACATIOlq OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO-) Parcel 3 PM X760 b Parcel 2 Tent PM 1238 ( 7th 5 MiIMI -er. LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: :lone. - I - -t ® 0 "r7TLL ,!ZTS PRO.: ?C —: YES NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground conto_rs? R 2. Cre:at-z a substantial chance in existing noise or vibration? x s_ Create a ssb;c_ntial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.) ". x A. Cre4:.:.% changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5: Remove any existing trees? How many: None 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as tonic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: No yes answers IMPJRiA71r: Zf the project involves the constrsctior_ of residential hits, complete the form on the nez.-t page. 11 CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements firnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my abi�ity, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are tree and correct to the best of my knowledge: and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Date 31113/81 Signature oseph B Hyde PE Title Engineer of Record %3 Develop--_ and Tentative Tract No. Specific Location of Proj:-t: PFiP58 2 PEASE 2 . PHASE 3 of single family units: 2. Nu_-ber of nnitio_ le family uz_ts: _ Date proposed to beg::-. ccnst_uctio^: 4. iarliest lots of GCC_�aa C•1' and r of Tcr_tative S. Bed_ocns Price :pence PHASE 4 TC�: lu DATE: TC: FROM: BY SUBJECT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STS REPORT January 1.3, 1982 Members cf the Planning Commission Jack Lam, Community Development Dir-eecctor Jerry R. Grant, Building Official APPEAL OF oRADING COMMITTEE DECISTGN - Grading proposal - .427 acre site, in the R -1 -20 zone located at the northeast corner of Sunstone Avenue and Hidden Farm Road. 1 7. ABSTRACT: This matter was continued from the December S meeting to allow onnortunity for the Planning Commission to review grading of sites that are similar to the proposed project. ANALYSIS: -1 ti:e previous meeting for consideraticr. of this item, several points were brought out that warrant review and response. The Grading Committee action whirl' prompted this appeal was based upon con- victions that the purpose of Ordinance No. 118, had not been achieved by the design proposal. Specifically, it was the Committees view than the Proposal with • iform, linear slopes would net "minimize the effects of gradinv bv dis.ouraging ,pass ,rading and exce sive_sloties to ensure that adjacent developed prryerties ", as outlined in the ordinance... It was likewise t e Committee vi ction o. a e ever pad would not "encourage tl: use of variety of housing styles, split -level grading techniques ". or "maintena%ce of view". The building plan submitted at the request of the Grading Committee has modular characteristics that could be modified to follow the existing slope, without drastic revision. In fact; ;.he door plan already includes changes in floor levels fro- certain portions of the structure to others. Unfortu- nately, the most drastic change from garage floor to main floor) is contrary to the slope of the lard rather than in keeping with the existing terrain. Were this elevation _:.:.ngc reversed, the gain floor level would be six feet below the level proposed and elimin:,-e the need for fill at the corner of the parcel. There was some speculation at the previous meeting that grading changes on the lot had already eliminated the natural character of the terrain. C=.di- tions at the site indicate that the subject lot is in a natural state. It appears th^.t some minor fill has been added to the parcel irr-,diately to the north and the parcel to the west, has been excavated (maxirr'= 6 feet height) and filled (maximum 31). The most obvious terrain change, in the immediate vicinity, occurred as a result of the construction of Hidden Farm Road, which was depressed to economically cross the drainage barranca which parallels the west side of S•snstone Avenue. Excavation for the :roadway and'depression created banks adjoining the roadways adjacent to the subject parcel. Other than the street-front banks, the lot appears to be substantially in a natural state ITEM I Appeal oY Grading Committee De^ision Ja ivary 15, 1982 �. Page 2 SYNOPSIS: The Grading Committet reached their decision based upon two conclusions: (a.) that the plan presented did not address the primary purpose of Ordinance No. 118, and, (b.) modification of the dwciling floor level was practical and export of the excess soil would not be an undue hardship upon the developer. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission has, several alternatives in reaching a decision: 1.) To conclude that the submitted proposal co=lies with the ordinance, which will establish guidance for determining suitable front yard slopes in future Committee actions. 2.) To determine that adherence to the ordinance would result in practical dif:i -u:ty or undue hardship on the developer. Such conclusion would, likewise, provide guidance for the committee, but would result in greater emphasis ca cost considerations in their deliberations in order to avoid future similar appeals. .i.) To coi;cur with the Committee decision. Respectfully submitted, JACK LAM, AICP Director of Community Deveioprant JL:JG:ps Attachments: Grading Plan Ordinance No. 118 v s o� oy � �m citcj?o � � DIN ao!ir.. �a Cam: vwtll`: _k �- ' .- ...:e. v.- ..:..r�.,� - . - in•� `-. ' .';',.,ti ^_i,.i. iii: _..,......:,'...ter,....,:._. ,�..- .... _..._ ..... _ .. v. .. ,. ,. `, r Im Oitu="CC ND. l y s AN ORmmlvxR Or THE Crrr or RA.YCRO CuCMD:.CA ESTARLISNINc A CRAD= C"CT=. pRt Vynl%C pa DEVELCpMeVN or CRADLSr. STARMRDS Alm ESTARLISKILL- IOLIC= Fol Z=W Or CRADINC PALS. The City Csucil of the City of Rancho CuCSpngA does rfl= As follow,: This ordi•wce shall be Imnvn and referred ro as the Crading ptmeodure of the City of Rambo Cutspe.gs. SEC^OV 1: SCOPE This ordinance smb'.Sa!ms -mgsiatloms for ubml.ttal and review of Con:aptnal grading Ames iv tpf0etclaa rich pcoposed davalnpaent. eatulLaMs a Crrding Con,sitw Low ��Mev of gradUM plau, sd provides for vstsbl.Lbment of seudards and ALdallnas Co be :Bliss& by CA Grading Cos •.tts,aad ocher City agsnciu In revY•i of inch Vltat. E -Sm.-3- Mp.POSE The purpoau of chit ordinance are: n &i (a) To m...n.. - the •cfccts of grading by dlsceutagi.n•. Doss gr ng and otCUS1w slC+as to Douce that � nawrsl eberaeter et tc-ala r TVt J W. j *ctt ootcr(b) To praserva significant tol gr&phlc Saatnru. ineluding 9 alw mtoutpp�s• native plant materials and natural L;drology MSla ` aging faprwed dra1•.age. from Inca dlrettly to a acraec, storm dram, or tmooV. public r privately n,jueaload ussant. CC) To ..Salt the Impact or slopes on adJaeut dwalopad pcnpertls end llmit Caostruttlon m Identified naisSC m gaelogic hazard hens. (d) To oucourage the use of a variety of boulsg st splltlave/ gradtut techniques. varied lot alas. site &sign densltis. polLClea� of ••Sae aa( artangewene and spaelmg to accomplish gtadlur m� SECTION d- DEPIMrnO1.S Shall >w er— the PvVPQWWC of this rhapte the defialtioe, 1LW MtsrdaT as speclfi.d in this v tm. --C'.'. - CmfCm" AL CV"lNC PLAN. Ctadtog plaoa CoafotminE to cM provisions of SKCioo h of chi Crd i.unca. Sntarmtloo,) yt GL NAD C I : i c PLAD is a plan sharing sll dsL ilad dm nwe grade alovaciou, building ]rations cad floor . levatlons. (e) PREI.TMILART CRADrSC KA.N s Y lam shoving taUAU�' elevctloos. typiccl OrninaRa meC.oOa oo beutiilgad. and 1m latvad fornatLon, usually orCIWLq finish floor elavaclons. building ..CSCLoos. petific drainage decade. SECfrON 5: ESTABLIMMENT Or CRADINC pm. -= There Is hereby mtublishad • Cradlag Cana:tgs, eoaprls,.d of one repreaentuClw from the RslidiqC hiviaioo, non repgaaentctiw Ytor the Englnmering DCVLaLon. and ono repreavneatiw erm tbs Ploarting DLvinion. ?1`a Crodlnt Comaitt ro shall: Ce) revinv aLl grading piuu sbelttN this ovdinance: uniar Section 4 of CL) CCXP11e utoudlyds nod CuldoLLnau routing to Kad4aR ooa- crsIncludlug. but not llmxed to. topography. dCalmga otnewrs... 1e..AtIon. pieeeLng. budding pad difforentlal h.lghta, sCeessibtliC'e sad weft ocher fcacureo or fucglons "ceWry to actoepllsb the puessaas Li u E 0rdinnom No. ILS rye 2 of this ordinance. Such standards &.td guldellses &hall be review' by the PLaming Cosis Ilan and spprove4 by clr City Council. when approved. the Standards and p aldellM wall he CJLlzed In review of all Reeding place subaLctod to :icy agencies for cbechLaP' and (c) arc a as initial reviewing body is ihs event chat praetica: difficvltr or undw hardship L created as a result of apr*ICS"on of the atondar4s Or >. idalia ag ar in the even diffrteaea c2 opinion arises as ta their appllcatloa. The fludings of &A Cr�ding Cos"ttee era final unle 0 dified by the Manning Comed"100, at a tegularly Scheduled Sid pla reaiew bearLag ar through appeal, as set frrth In Section 9 of this tdieance. fbs plane am hoc mblett to ten.•• W the rLensing C.Winsto t SEC.TCOS .: GRADING TCZV -9W IfMCE'1Q. M . A' ..: t as of wSbsictal of a Tanucrie Tract lap. TQU=tlre r rarcel Map. or Sit, ?I= for De. t1opanac gowtaw, the applicant shall f also sobeic the f� Iowixn Ldorm loo: (a) U, „unl rrcates Y,.p which .Cell identify all slope bank'-. ridgellnes, wwral drainage courem. rock mtcr'apP +ago, exis;:sg ,"vtacioa earthy d cossidaa:atloo for preservation. Also depleted shall be landslide. Sad otter eaisring Seologlc balards. Each feature depicted shall be i oted for its visual -'Sol Acetate. eanKromantal function. or both. Cb) A Q ntaprual Codify plots including info CLoe asceeear'y to dc* runlet the pt oposee =,: Ivg cone ?u. elevatlots of pads. and nataral :esturm t: be ¢n erved. The following spselflc Interactive shell he dept -tad: 1. Areas to be haft natural. . 2. Alma of proposed cuc and fill In ma=- Clog colon. with are,. ~a tut And fill exceed daprhs eatablisbed Its the hillaida davalaDsft YsLdellme clearly shown. 3. Contours shell be %Suva for 43d -'tiog natural land eoadltlons cad proposed week. The proposed final grsds sba11 Ind-cats Warty all tors. fills. Std %Japan. Cmenors shell be shown according to to following schedule- Is tur&1 S 109a maxImtan Interval, Fast of lase 2 war 2Z i up ta 9Z 5 ver 9% 10 .- ...r /ptral drainage and flood coartoL Leillt eg t sr -:bisg pleased dralrsge lsproveaeM&. 5. f mceptual Leader" zescmat Plan .d"Ictlag proposed a roman conrrolmsasurr�. - n. L uerol vicinity of the Proposed stn. .. P vperty 113d" and aea%rrata of enema E vo.d and + ^ der•% of •-a ed arws 1 R. L airing dimnmioms. elevations. W fialshed j c txure to be achieved bf e" .grading. rad proposed . d siesta epewneJt. retAlelog wells. nab related C, Detraction sieve by coutaur sap. trose- 06ttlnns. of other sash&. f 4. L< ,clos of any .,Gating bul.2"ags of smutdaes ( m cb^ Property when tb. work Is co'be Performed .. at 1 the approaiaota location and sine of any buildlf pa Is h'CoPosed os the lead. "Jaeest panda vithtn 5C fast of the property or which a" be affected by th Proposed grading shall also be sMwo.. 1 (c) A Cev1a teal and Sells Psoort, prepared by . a. approv d soila amin.ering fin and it anfficianc detail W oubet&ntlata ed mrpport the dl%LXn caaepts Proem ad in the preparation an awbsirted. - (d) s. Top,Et %able ","I, as .determined neeeseety by tc•c �Du0c:zor at Cosue%ty Develop tens t x •Lart(LeStcnc of the proposed �sradlK::pJwo: The i state mat ba %uCficw ; to delineate details. . . . t L MP ordiaanw Ko. 128 Page 3 The submitted information shall be miwed by the Creding Committee during pertinent ravtev process. The Cead_og Camdrtes shall not approve a conceptual gradis plan unless It 1s found to cmfocm with the policies. standards. and guidelines, established by or pureasnt to chic ordinance. the spproved conceptual grading plan shall provide Cho basis for preliminary acd /or final gradlag plan approval under ettwr city regulatiorm. :eclTal The Community Develop t Director may usiee any or all of the requirements of Section 6 of this Ordinance if be detatsimes that meq proposed waiver „ell bow 00 significant eftect upon topography. drainage. she /or ustural feacures. SECTION a No Tentative tract Map. Tentative Parcel flap, or Site Plan submitted for Development Revive shall be approved until a conceptual Srading plat has been approved or has been waived. =CrTon 4 Any Snt40es0e1 parson INKY, ritb:A 34 day- after A decision by Cho Cmdinz Committee. appeal said decision in writing to the Planning Casaiaatoa Pursuant cu aPPeul proeaduraa outlined in the zoning ordioasea. SECTION 10 The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the, City Clark shall sttaac m the seen. and the Cicy Clark stall cause the satx to be puhlishad ithia fifteen (15) days afar its passage, at least once in The Daily Rroorr, a newspaper of Several circulation published In the City of Ontario. California and circulated In Cho City of Banela Cucamonga. Cslifotmla. PAS9ID. APPBOM. and ADCP= this 20th day of August. 1980. AXES.- Prost. PSkals. Palombo. Bridge. Schlosaes XM: Noce ABSZOT: Move AV ST: �41an itl Lauren M. Yesaerman, City Clerk illbp D. Schloemer. Mayor E C A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 13, 1432 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development BY: Arlene Troup, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELUPMtN7 it KLVw nU. DONAT - The development of a total of 37,000 square Teez of office building on 3.25 acres of land in the C -2 zone located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Ramona Avenue - APN 20 8-301 -16 & 17 SUMMARY: The Applicant, Vista Investment Properties, is requesting review and approval of the development o= ; site located on the south- west corner of Foothill Boulevard and Ramona Avenue. The project has been reviewed by the Design and Development Review Committees and has undergone appropriate revisions per their comments. Staff has reviewed the project and has recommended Conditions of Approval for your consid- eration. The site is located on a Special Boulevard, and as such, is to receive full review from the Planning Commission. Also,.the Commission is to make a determination on the environmental assessment for the project. BACKGROUND: The Applicant is proposing the construction of a 7,000 square foot bank building, a 10,800 square foot medical office complex, and a 19,200 square foot professional office complex on 3.25 acres of land. The property is currently zoned C -2 (General Commercial) which is in conformance with the General Plan. The site is surrounded by C -2 zoning on the north, east, and west. There are commercial developments along the north side of Foothill Boulevard,and a used auto sales lot is cur- rently located on the property west of and adjacent to the subject property. A mobile home park has been developed on the property located at the southeast corner of Foothill ano Ramona. The property to the south of the subject property is zoned R -1 (Single Family Residential) and has been developed with single family homes which are separated from the commercial property by a 20' wide alley. ITEM J 1 DR 81- 38 /Donat Planning Commission Agenda January 13, '.982 Page 2 The site is currently vacant, however, a similar proposal for commercial develop- ment of the property was reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission in August of 1980. t is felt that the present proposaLit an improvement on the earlier aD off] -n i,_,� tCr t affic- an�f3ne at traffic t m reecconventional hours. It would therefore be more compatible with adjacen -' residences. Should the Commission approve the current proposal, there is a con- dition in the Resolution that would nullify the previous proposal. ANALYSIS: The project has been developed in accordance with the City's Sub- division and Zoning Ordinances and the General Pian. Foothill Boulevard is designated as a Special Boulevard in the General Plan and the Applicant has proposed to landscape it accordingly with moundinq, fast growing trees, and a meandering sidewalk. Also, some drought resistant material will be incor- porated into the landscaping, in keeping with the City's goals of conserving water and energy. The location of the drive - through teller facilities for the proposed bank was discussed by the Design Review Committee. Since relocating the facilities to another face of the building would impair traffic circulation due to the stack- ing up of waiting automobiles, it was felt that they were best located along the north face; however, because Foothill Boulevard is a Special Boulevard, it was agreed that the drive - through facilities would have to be appropriately screened through the use of berming and shrubbery. These details will be re- viewed by Staff on the Detailed Landscaping Plans. The frontage road currently in existence aiong Foothill Boulevard will be vacated. Access to the site will be provided off of Foothill and Ramona, as well as off the alley along the south side of the propeety. The appropriate andmthe spaces has dequateafire dand safety circulation. Also, pedestrian traffic has been encouraged by the inclusion of a continuous pedes- train walkway system. Approximatieiy 120 if the parking spaces shown are designed for compact cars. Currently our Zoning Ordinance does not allow for the ability to designate parking spaces for compact cars in commercial areas. Recently, in the Indus- trial Specific Plan, standards were adopted which would require that 200 of the parking provided be designed for compact cars (8' wide by 16' deep). Currently the Planning Staff is draf'ing a proposal for a Zoning Ordinance Amendment which would allow for compact car stalls in commercial and residenti;.J It is felt that such a revision is in keeping with the goals and polices or the City towards energy conservation and preservation of open space. As such, it is felt that this project may be approved conditionally, subject to amendment of the Zoning Ordinance, prior to the issuance of Building Permits. DR 81- 38 /Donat Planning Commission Agenda January 13, 1982 Page 3 The building elevations, as showr on the colored renderings, show the use of off -white stucco and terra cotta tile. Decorative stamped concrete has been shown in the entryways to the proposed buildings and at the driveway entrances to give a unified design theme to the site. Full street improvements will be required, including but not limited to, a landscaped inedian in Foothill Boulevard and an alley to the rear of the property. Drainage of the lot will be generally directed south and east through the property to Ramona Avenue. The Grading Committee and the Engineering Division have given conceptual approval to the proposed method of drainage. The Design and Develop- ment Review Committees found the project to be an appropriate and favorable devel- opment for this site. Please find attached Part I of the Initial Study, completed by the Applicant, which discusses various environmental factors relative to the project. Staff has completed Part II. No adverse impacts on the environment due to this devel- opment are anticipated. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission issue a Negative Declaration for the proposed development and conditionally approve t;ie develop- ment proposal. The recommended Conditions of Approval are listed in the attached Resolution and Standard Condition form. Respectfully submitted, , c JACK LAM, AICP Director of Community Development JL:AT:jr Attachments: z3< U i Resolution with Conditions of Approval Initial Study, Part I Exhibits "A" - "G" i RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 81 -38 LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND RAMONA AVENUE IN THE C -2 ZONE WHEREAS, on the 20th day of November, 1981, a complete application was filed by Kurt Donat for Vista Investment Properties for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 13t,, day of January, 1982, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above - described project. NOW. THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SEC7'ON 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed; and 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially in- jurious to properties or improvements in the -vi.cinity; and 3. That the proposed use is in coum fiance with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, conditional to approval of an amendment regarding compact car stalls; and 4. That the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. SECTION 2: -hat this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on January 13, 1982- SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 81 -38 is approved subject to the fot� owing conditions and attached standard conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. The drive - through teller facilities for the proposed bank shall be adequately screened from Foothill Boulevard, with the use of berming and a hedge. The landscaping plans shall include the details of the landscaping screen. I] �1 0 0 El Resolution No. Page 2 2. Vines and tall, cylindrical shrubs or trees shall be planted on all of the large flat wall areas. 3. Drought resistant material shall be incorporated 1747 An landscape design. 4. An amendment to the Zoning Ordinance shall be approved prior to the issuance of building permits E that would allow for the use of compact car stalls J`Q in commercial zones. 5. Trash enclosures shall be designed with a pedestrian access way in addition to the large gates for vehicular access. 6. Conditional Use Permit 80 -01, which was approved on August 13, 1980, shall hereby be nullified. ENGINEERING DIVISION 1. The excess right -of -way along the frontage road adjacent to Foothill Souleva-ad shall be vacated prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. Revised Tentative Parcel Map No. 6114 shall be recorded prior to the issuance of building permits. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1982. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of January, 1982, by the following vote - to -wit: AYES: NOES: ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: r< 1 JI u co M v 1 4 Go r � V Y v C.4ip w ✓Y.V w � v. �Qq P _O -r{r C V w C tlKO Cw abi �_ N •� C c rr ✓ L � L L O L J V y C '� i - 7 C L •N+ t c O tl G 4 r N p b ± � ✓ O <y'•l � �+ T\ 4 4 C•LC 9 J V V n V _ TO tl r � _ V r. � V✓ .Li.• M O 4 LL •J C L L L � v .r• 6 .Oi - O V L° � L✓ T NC )`!, �y ✓V 4 L. <� rO Ctl ONTO 9M C L•• ry NNb C r L S 4 Z + 4 C �� V 6 � • r O G � •s T S� � r tl .n 9 _ T l pJ V T N O " V tl � L ..r C L uy N ✓ V� .-r r V n V •' V w I� r. r+� N '.L.r �= ✓ N -y✓ V +� FLU !z + O ^ VV C�S•L.rY �y� .n � S .+ C G• n l 'J N o^ V �✓e4 r 0 � ✓WC4>. 0 N y ` V G ) Lr.�O CI `L w- n C 4 w�p Y iti c NN N` C y w= tlj S V TO I. uLyV V° G bC N•' ••L r...r �� O �GQQY ww. w,} OGL �O N •4 tlr }i by�40C b9 C rG O.O NC {i + vG NGI VlL a O L✓ VLO .Z .xu 4 4 L� - L_ NJ V - n _>V G +t CTP +9` p } :z�.z r l G Y4 �'� r V 6 • �o O � 4r N rC Ca'O . yl JY V= L.Ly PO�.4 w. O pCT cV N r•.r�y 2 n rV �OV VT �> m ✓tl �` r. a y y �Q� C7 Cp VO�L�✓ L 4 �V 1V yGy u b r __ + wu. OOr •f�tl f•NV .n� V N r•'r p= C� 4r > 7N✓ 6G ✓ yV�CyO N✓ °p V .Lir�4a'CO' rlV Vi ` r CrJ n9 tl f✓04 �! N Z +'V Vgfi >VS tl =r LJ N� ✓= r+ r 4 re l r0 O ✓ y. •.� � yV`C fa .j .� ju <i PN _ r L ° � � - V = Y V CI tl v C T� 1 r � _ C` 1 V r ° N _ Y V O V C O r✓ i �. T� f J \OtlC O rtl _ -r VV N �wr Nu��ju\O �I ° 6r N6 <+ C v0f0 VVO_•NV N f VS r a� Cy4 �� rn` -C Vy L <w W� k u 1r ✓04L �Jp Y r_V NSA .O LIZ �CL l; wN r L •'ir VLr1 {O 6 0 I - OO � tl f i4 yr O✓ •GO• c�� Z GV _G V� t 1 � C �` ✓� L Z i � � Y � O V__ •� rJ w Y V O - C r O� ��� �r L 4 V° .r O w y •. ^N N w p� _E +_o 41 u -� �rC V u` +L rVi + C Y� n✓ L qT D L-V4 _^ y u w N u N` - _V y4 V= C N L_ C WO V L `r C ✓ l+0 S p y y =:4 4 r V y O i - V S !9 < T J- =22; L co ✓ °c c- _ y _ ` c ,4„+ V -} co ✓ ryG0< L Q 'if O + l V 9 }r. N V J i CG � VV YV OV. •.CIL ! N! _ ci N VtNV Wz p` yw d✓� -` P� =TC C� °V �_ =� Y �� . L V �� +p +L ✓ ' � yV a O C rM 4!C ..C. ✓OL r0 `iii sV yV r 2 A -g= O !z <I V 4 YV r a w p W T 6 u ` C y r< N c4 r b° r C V G wc! zV + MGr .Vi° g0 000 �V II Y N F%I � VWO �� �� _tl + rsCr M C < 4M pL✓ C� ;S 4� NNE Z^ r�� cNV YC ✓ 4y 4 rSr {ter y'L" _�✓, Lq6 t"L p0. °r CtlY .^r F0 pr r C W }O p r4 9P+ 0 =� f� r.V == '� L yCC p uOtl Y_ Y9 � y� NV £� L �� <•tl Qi `r 9 G C 4 q 0 L ]n V2 jL �N ° C ."• y j c CJ r Q ` C r V } C F .Vn me yi_ V O ry 6G N ^O. S9 V••r✓ ON ` jV U +» 01:. r•...0 .Vr T✓C 0� V V LV -wCOO +� LC✓y Oyi `qr �CLC�y _L VI V >00 �Vi Oti V1 bV iL V< LET �� X04 L�N L4iN N� +�4 <C.r1 r r M� .113 ��K Hy� R� Gy •L'C _� ~`p> y =1 <r prr �` t4a <o w:. is <✓ 4 is a, r< 1 JI u m V. < �• opv ".L. Iu:` ft C• O ` � =r = :✓i I io _ .:r w_Yy C T .O ^� r L G O f' I o c• ., r .O �. q V _L _Y ♦^ L L q I O y ✓ V 1T< � 7 aV. _° �_ G q r � A Y R V . p` � .:' i_ V r •r ✓rc�.`� Ca ._ ^` }•� 1 �' 3 Luc I� -'.. ._ �o ZLtl =i ♦ !�_ _Y °V= C.G TL C 4 °' LO t l.V ° CNOrL� q �C °1 \L CwIIV VA GP 4 r V JL_U GCQ Q LN E C L I.v± L JVwC ✓ s �/ _l' = Y b C�✓ q EN w � N AT q C - __ q✓ 110 u'�Y Y NCt S Q N O ^ Ir o NAG _ ly � "Ar r yLy rrC �G Y V rVU •°••a ' ° �u �.^rLV4 y JTP �Y _4 `L =� p v M 7 w Y n� ° w u�` == u � • L_�` �« � yC. N 4 � � Y ° � �M✓ ✓ c_w I ` G 1 VL.2 QOP C.r 7::7 31 lNY ��' V_VC9.ri =j NLN OO.S _ >{{ > TO ^O !L + L „GV ..Yi CU =i_ _Y pO C N _ •q” Z -W _+ K(( � L.r✓ V ✓ =bY.nL q�r S _ NV^ 04 v � V _� A`C L 1. G< Lc i -v •Z aL. N W V4.V.• Q' �✓ q VaLi ✓O YNy ✓„ .;4 G C� CCU NO L �_ •!° CCC ff �f_�V�.pL °"u.N. �Yw Iw vu� 7q VfLl yC Y NL,V OVU V�VP Nn .� ar 4L�V � � W < — �e ° d _ OC C 9N Lrq V V` _..G` 4L ��q C✓ q �:CL Nw O rr"•r 1. w 4Z C y ' y q^ L y O V i 2. ✓ a N 4'. O. r P C V C y V J..s C w ✓� r M f: Y °° ✓wS' `yr °c .' woM VL 4 �•o.'n .`, =bY OC'ty Y' a < oe ,..s, C L� CV y�I v �R[ ✓✓ ^y irf 40> \4 —V PNr C�44r _ Pr O L \ bC wr� O -0wr °r {CV �CJr °� LL yi_✓ ^V C�P r�0 C iC °VV_a _M C-J r•L. W y —� �d -0C pNCr yqY,` E� ^q�4< V'V LLP .n 11 + n• `� V� p =y �r �< ^ L qLr a Or r0 =�•V r_ '. Z. .°..Y r ZV ° V• s_ V \6 y`L� r ppP`rt ^ N�y NGy • i� .Li �' V °�O� 1 P ✓ < L C� O. N r Z.• ` O C l.. O✓ r q V O Y �j Y`. G�Vr V L ✓ rV �O S`°�♦`r q'n ✓` ^O VY. p 1♦ ° Vr L q E. ^VU-0 L OqV Y rC Y YEa r rJ` °T L X r P 6\ P ♦. = fi N E P q t w L '^ GL N E q wN E ✓rq ° � i �r 9+r.. o° � � AV_'rc "�' _ Lr Aq ra P nb Y � L �� Y` G ✓_ Iy Z -0 ✓iVi ` AC C _ 6C ��L�`YC P.0 CAL =`A`q✓ q` _ �V r Y O l qS LC Cr eo ✓G O•aq OLq� —y .Vi O.� L y V .IOr nL X 2T N 4 4 NV p 4L �w -0P�°.L�CQ .p _ S..C. L _2 (, _ qr0 Npw yV N _O Lo' flr2 yy ..jY rte~ LVw G Yr O O °\ =rP _CL OV % 4 V CC'�cc OF TC9C ^1 YV gqfjr _LV.� 1 r z r � V N° 72 y •° Y` V + ° 4! VG -0 L D O C g w• ° V p v LI � LL y C � q V !` f... w L Pr �� C O t i w r n= u �\ !-•. p\ GGC Y w w N� y }N` rL O.V V� V p� {/LO✓ r CG _CN V O[r K .j LIMO �u HY�•°i KY iL V�_'?•�9 Y4VP��p NVO.Li• Vr _Lt VN <PGMwt�OG �I wl � • of p ° ~ � 1 F y 1 cv c i - N� i P �h l ��•V_ �O � O N� v j�lN `°' r r 7 -:5 Y l\ 4 \ C•� �.`t ['V^ �.S NPir iY� �Vr V�v Vn �aN s•- c` -c l.VC, n .V.` °• a c�L_ r v >` uu�� <.r-b r COF C_ py � 1 r I V<3� � °o �cwi.F � =nr — ♦� coo e�� c r- . -i•c.e v r° w 1 I I [' .. / $ 7P Friairr d. `wo L .-.i •.'. ° w e c L I I = �+Qk 71 r`.N�: tr r = ' w i^ C •. T O 4./ V O C v r. �' r ° � _ _ < I �'f�yy � ~ � r •0Y •- "= n {.1 T Y[ L !` ..•_ w 4C n �. � � p V .rte`. I 1 i%Q � V N n r.� r � n ur r l V dnlr _ T r Nn O V Y r CxC V= ` —..O �O S r ♦✓ + r4 CO /� Lr�r`� V yr a 1 [ -il••• OC4 LL —V IVPO [r.VN r�VOdi�VPT— ?l i_I VLO � n `LlV G y�r V T 4 uL L N N r O 4 r° V Q (' O r i N r' V u °✓ O W V ° r r y OL Q% w i Y n'O• L u4w [-�O NN.C..�P 1� r h ._ J Q rO G.Tr q. t� w = L .ry< TpnLT NI YrN r X+ V r_ M !rdr.'. °p^ �v "^ °F: P.r ° — •/='rA L, L w w o`. : -'•4r. uw iitr r �—. 4 I cT Cd �.� eqg o• �_ a 6r o°i: `(' �" E vim: r .. r qaL. ` �� n NO =5z iN L rV K 4 C V O V v.. N LO 4N I y 'r V =ycYL t0 O t1 cn LV 2 T O n G L r V r E _ M —YO V u aO.-L� Tf Z_ VnN M>.L 5 —OC 4G V ' q rY CreON _C.d TVN prV V_Jr _Nr� - V RO S. ..rpNU-rrS CO S Cj L .` C�� 9L.`N J6 NO G n !-V CV• ;. (y��gg'.c� Y_LL � I—E Y SV•�Vd '��CS ay�r .• — - o�i�r�r= 4x i• i r aN �_ _ c.. `4 `T w_E iT•4 _ ` �� `" e Lw T «L'O x • -4n�E nyY `r p CN >C r°. N04�r W rr« ALO ✓NGN E NV O O �� `M �= 46 q•N __VV L' v -� Cr V� W P � w 4� V ` F wY.v °._:.�� Ti '- np4 yNL; p --� wi �•' —e o'_ `Wa L4V �'• ' 1C MprT �V<4 w�V A SV� OWC (r i `O YVO 6L �L .rrVPOa 4ri r � r VV}L 'J 6W L L r. 7nr y� _r Vi _c3 CN wPrO p 07 7y r0v MC LV W V� NY 4P`4 r� M nb NV • C�(/ICy.Wrtr OGf..I Gu � =O.V �rOI_L: t�N�w L Q N �i = Vny ^VV•..L s4rC 4`lC n� C_ CYY _ O ✓ �L �[ l.n O wa �NJOC�r —L � r r «4P N _ .•o V''A c +C k r� �e Yc r°•Y r,, � mac.. �T �_� y n Z r' O M �y= c P.N. : 4 g w °v —°e °4 ��N r_ n Nrq :�.. — So rwo� �i� off: � dN oLO� � w[°[ - odn ���'r.�.L_•rd _i CV( «Y �. � �_.[ vf' .+t'cYa= own [•L..r �� �r n� QC iN ✓�C_lN_yNy —F.rr^ Nor` d � V«Y �i� Vn"1_>n E rte C _ _ —1q « Z v CJp 7V�Sw -�L N ai M re0 L .Os C �yE—�4 O6 L W � 4 p T T O Q I— r_ T l ' V L n M L V V �r � ✓� O V y N w r\ Y G i � wYYc� V .L- .°.. X Y I•N E�L1V9 Sn W OQ7 erp °Y.�2 3r._ w f °_ l�J\ L: V` 4 %♦ L .L rrOiV L°�6Cn_rw t— C y V Y L y> 49p4p i� Y Ld9�V N GV Ri4 r LV WY y.°I W M r ° cY. b a G V _o } 0 0 p w w q =e 2. L a — S u J v` r �• o . C w Y Y rc t O o 4 w of 4 r rN O � V b e ` ✓ l •- n � c f• c . c C_r< � q S O 4 ^ q Lr b � r w L o•4•� S q �r = J V L r � V T V L v ° v <4' y. L r 0 M V w� q O u n r n P L Q � r b i cy Z C L �q F N y L N V �I N M9 q� � n r d O � c o V r A i V O O 7 y Y r— m e — W q 4iS r �r t— 7 P r b S r q' a u V V�r ° V 4 b b_ _w SC S� Cr r q i O C y r'r i u LrC _b O i V G <V N SO j G O C V IC P t L C V — G 4 Q ZE 4 v r � V s= 9 V C YG r z L S yr qL. Y W z V v V r T.P �r =YC Yu rr L •KK.O'' zG C O•^ t r -< V �� q S C - C J4 Y � t 4 O O 4AT V L ° J`e- My � <a V y C V C -°• L T r t ••� � T V L v ° v <4' y. L r 0 M V w� q O u n r n P L Q � r b i cy Z C L �q F N y L N V �I N M9 q� � n r d O � c o V r A i V O O 7 y Y r— m e — W q 4iS r �r t— 7 P r b S r q' a u V V�r ° V 4 b b_ _w SC S� Cr r q i O C y r'r i u LrC _b O i V G <V N SO j G O C V IC P t L C V — G 4 Q ZE 4 v r � V s= 9 V v YG r z L r W z t P o C O•^ t r -< V �� q S C - C J4 J`e- 7C ^ r C V C -°• L T r t ••� � <Q•v V V_ ` Y 4-• Vq pzG C �VJ�T•rr MCI rtYn SL ^i �.w4�� r n< yr Mz ,Zw �d °� "• � C 4 n — V V L L R� V V y �^°r4G S�uv4 r� yr VLV` V4V JP r {. P1`�w _ J^ L C V z E V�OOr v� n O .,. L V q L. ✓ � T o � r, � r 4 0 .n V q V O ` V r 9 S d L 4• L i L r .V.. �.r d cv <p i<.� R � ✓Y � n.r 4v Ld � i q OIr`� q` ,Vy rG Yr GJw `ST•y� nL V' V 4 ro C — O O Qu Sw �Y �Mr y� VV t.w n L T V L v ° v <4' y. L r 0 M V w� q O u n r n P L Q � r b i cy Z C L �q F N y L N V �I N M9 q� � n r d O � c o V r A i V O O 7 y Y r— m e — W q 4iS r �r t— 7 P r b S r q' a u V V�r ° V 4 b b_ _w SC S� Cr r q i O C y r'r i u LrC _b O i V G <V N SO j G O C V IC P t L C V — G 4 Q ZE 4 v r � V s= 9 V v YG r z L z t P o C O•^ t r -< V �� q S C - C J4 J`e- 7C ^ r C V C -°• L T r t ••� � <Q•v V V_ ` Y 4-• Vq pzG C �VJ�T•rr p'r�C rtYn SL ^i �.w4�� r n< yr Mz ,Zw �d °� "• � C 4 n — V V L L R� V V y �^°r4G S�uv4 r� yr VLV` V4V JP r {. P1`�w _ J^ L C V ��CwV V)p�6�. V�OOr v� r_I <V YiyLy o �� I V L t C O•^ t r -< V �� q S C - C J4 J`e- C V C -°• L T r t ••� � <Q•v Vq pzG C �VJ�T•rr p'r�C rtYn SL ^i �.w4�� r n< yr °� "• � C 4 n — V V L L R� V V y �^°r4G S�uv4 r� yr VLV` V4V JP r {. P1`�w _ C V ��CwV V)p�6�. V�OOr v� <V YiyLy �� I 4w M i n Y V V O L S to 0 1i J 9 yZ8,: �Q`4 Gti r 0 �GY= VOGV 6ryryy � aecV --2 0' ;' 0 L. EO_ Ppi J_pY/ p C N�vY C6L •w LC r crag ooV L v •CC � i F_r FL "V to 0 1i J _p1i i C C r O Q �.�+ V p C •w V qq � V O t �L O VN y ti C' 4Y� rt. r L `N v % _ = � G j; O ^� ° _ L 7.W �Ar V }l� a• - •O.O.y Orr re 1 OkCk ...• �ICtr � V� y�V �r rOCV v i ° co +o n~17 tit c oYa` r. �. L Y S � E r �`� V �' L b 0� SIc�n`C •Oir o�O= �q ° rav 4L =t EI O \��m O O F L � TJJ PY �.S W 4C✓ V `i ^�I •Vy 4>\dC � TC_ LN°6 GyS V9L� V V Vr � ` V V P•ItO f• V M l L L !/ l' ` E r cm w VO 1L y� 4�C L V a `Y V T w VV °•w� r' I O 4OV 1r 4r iG1}C � I V C OC S 4V =O C $� t. 1 t s•�.. •t ` t. to s`o ti��a L N n Y M b to 0 1i J bvrmed cmnucit - Vi FOOTHLL B= 777----f 3L r AL ISINK t:j I -Ij A ri4bg A sn-E RAN Dm VtqtM MAF =imv* OTY OF Imm: RANCHO CUCAMONGA TrrLE: PLANNINC DIVISION Exiiarr. scALE, 0 E NC%a'H ; FOOTHILL MYO.� R� ®P WE PLAN •• �" VIdMiY MAP I�'OR tf-I CITY Or RANCHO CUCANNONGA : -�1, • �,� -�ti,; �; 1 -�„ PLANNING DIN SION L`U4mm. ri SCALE, .1� •I ....,, �..: ..� a u r ME L ` y 11 t1A0D - h1 — ' AIXI�X ApP <�O- r� 0 HCW/lXA/IP �'.. t *.Mrmm" bt seem=NOnfrow"Mc GROM i,�n �... w1•'L.°."'io Mw �a.':a.r r +..r.u..c c..�.n.. wo CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DW SION ExHiBrr. SCALE. L� �t Nom , ..,, _,^*tr mss,.:, i ear e%vawn /rasa m give 1 cg= C b'',: mm scum elevation 0 i Mip vow eevation BAWL CITY OF RANCHO CUCA1'- 10:\.GA PLANINI \G DI\r.SlaN s a TnIE- E HIBIT= SCALE=b'c'i.�uga I iV V i NORTH I I 0 east eievaim , w MECICA� SUI*ES �-+r 0 c � NORTH CITY or ITF..Nl: ItV. i . -�- RANCHO CUCATMO Gk e XAc At PLANNING DI\'ISIO,i EXHIBIT. �_ ALE: CIT7 lf�r� . I OF RANCHO CUCA',"%4aNGA PLANNING DIVISION '77-77 rrEotl: LXHOT. 0 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO cucAmONOA STAPP REPORT January 13, 1982 Members of the Planning Commission Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner FOR The development of 301 singe family homes within the vlct Planned Community located north of Base Line Road, west of Etiwanda Avenue, and south of Highland Avenue. SUMMARY: Tentative Tract 11934 was approved November 10, 1981 �y the Planning Commission with the condition that a app i y for point rating relative to the design section of the Growth Manage- ment Ordinance. This is to be accomplished prior to final approval and recordation of the map. The applicant recently submitted a design pack- age for the first phase of this tract and on December 29, 1981, it Was reviewed by the Design Review Committee. Since the project received a favorable rating, it is now before the Planning Commission for your review and consideration. Staff has prepared a detailed Staff Report and Resolution of Approval with Conditions for your review and consid- eration. BACKGROUND: The applicant, the William Lyon. Company, is requesting review e'w an3 approval of their design package in order to develop 301 single family homes as the first phase of the Victoria Community Plan. Of the 301 homes to be built, 125 will be located on 3000 square foot lots, 101 will be placed on 5000 square foot lots, and 74 will be plotted on 7200 square foot lots. The Design. Review package submitted consists of elevations, floor plans, site plans, landscaping concepts for Victoria Parkway and local streets, fence design and construction, design of the RV parking area, and the park phasing plan. Colored plans OF the above items will be available for your review at the Planning Commission ;meeting. Exhibit "A" illustrates the portions of Tentative Tract 11934 which are being considered for design approval at this time. The remaining por- tions of the Tract must receive separate design approval. ANALYSIS: As mentioned above, Tentative Tract 11934 has three basic lot sizes; 3000 square feet, 5000 square feet, and 7200 square feet. Each lot size area will have a separate group of floor plans and eleva- tions. Exhibit "B" provides a detailed analysis of the major design characteristics in each of these lot size areas. ttl ?� Design Review for TT 11934 Planning Commission Agenda January 13, 19892 Page 2 When cansidering the project, the Design RE!view Committee discussed major topics such as landscape treatment of Victcria Parkway and local streets, fence location, design, materials and cent- action methods, architectural treatment of the units including street- facing side elevations, and treat- ment of the front elevations with the bonus room. Also discussed was the overall design and plotting of units within the subdivision. When the meel'Ang concluded, the Committee voted in .favor of the project design with the stipulation that the fence construction he reviewed by Staff. Relative to these topics discussed by the Design Review Committee, the Victoria Planned Community Text establishes standards fo:- development. Included in these standards are requirements for building setbacks, distances between buildings, grading techniques, number of trees required per lot, RV parking, and fencing placement. Conditions of Approval have been prepared to assure that these requirements will be met. Currently, the engineered drawings submitted by the applicant do not meet a number of these require- ments. Corrections must be made and submitted to the Planning Division for their approval prior to approval o` final Grading Plan a:ad issuance of Building Permits. Development standards set forth in the Community Plan which are not met by this proposal include the following: - 1. Garage setbacks measured from the back of the sidewalk must be 4' to 8' or greater than 18'. 2. All units must maintain a fifteen foot setback from jilroad property. 4. Property line fences between dwe:lings must be provided by the developer within the 3000 square foot lot area. �5 Additional archipecttw.Al treatment is required on �J all elevations v Bible rom public roads, trails, or open space. 6. Two trees per iot are required within the 7203 square foot lot area and 1.5 trees per lot is required in the 5000 square foot lot area. Contour graded slopes which create natural ap- pearan,M is required as illustrated on Exhibit "C ". ® Design Review for TT 11934 Plannir; Luu miccion Agenda January 13, 1982 Page 3 Revisions are also necessary for the RV parking area since adequate turn- around and back -up space is not provided as shown on Exhibit "D ". A standard within the Planned Community Text requires that pools be enclosed with a 5' high fence. This standard conflicts with another City Ordinance which requires that pools be enclosed by a five and one -half foot fence. Staff feels that Victoria should provide minimum fire and one -half foot fences in the event a homeowner desires to install a pool or spa. Also for your consideration tonight is the park phasing plan as shown on Exhibit ". Concerned with the placement of units within the subdivision, Staff conducted a detailed analysis of interior s.treetscapes. What was found is a streetscape typical of many tract subdivisions. While a wide variety of exterior materials are used in each lot size area, the actual unit design as seen from the street is similar. This is best illustrated by placing the colored building elevations side by side. Individually each elevation is nicely done, but in aggregate, the design appears monotonous. This is significant since a major design goal of any subdivision is to maximize the variety and style of units seen from the. street. Variety in the unit design and plotting reduces the "tract" effect of a development. Throughout the preparation of the Victoria Text. the plan was backed with the understanding it will exemplify innovative subdivision design. The style of development in this first phase is critical since it will set the tone for development not only in Victoria, but also throughout- this area of Rancho Cucamonga. With;n the boundaries of Victoria, 600 acres of land are desig- nated as Low or Low - Medium density and will accommodate approximately 2765 dwelling units with characteristics similar to this tract. This represents approximately 30Z of the development in Victoria. For these reasons, Staff feels, that the interior streetscape of this tract must be improved to set it apart from other single family residential developments in the City. There- fore, Staff cannot support approval of the design until further work is accomplished. Staff is particularly concerned about the plotting of units in the 3000 square foot area. Since the houses are played approximately 10' apart, the repetitiveness of similar units will be evident and will detract from the design. Staff believes that more unit variety is necessary to reduce the "raw house" look of the streetscape. Also, with the small lot sizes, efficient use of all available land is critical. Staff believes that this unique lot size can be developed with a combination of center plot, zero lot line /attached units with combined driveways and side entry garages to add variety to the streetscape. Some of these design considerations, partic- ularly side entry garages ane combined drives, should be considered in other areas of the tract. Design For IT 11934 Planning Commission Agenda January 13, 1982 Page 4 REECOMMENDATION: The Design Review Ccr—A ttee has given the proic-ct a favor- able rating and recommends approval based on their sugggested conditions. Staff recommends that the proposal not be approved at this tame to allow revisions consistent with their comments. Attached is a pr.)posed Resolution with Conditions should the Planning Commission find the designs acceptable. Respectfully submitted, JACK LAM, A.ICP Director of Community Development JL:CJ:jr Attachments: Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Resolut "A" - Site Plans "B" - Unit Design Characteristics "C" - Contoured Grading Techniques "D' - RV Parking Site Plan "E" - Park Phasing Plan ion of Aporoval with Conditions 11 E 7200 SO. FT. SEE SHEET S R. V. PARKING EE EXHIBIT is 3000 SO. FT. SEE SHEET 2 CITY Or RA -NCI-10 CLVAONMONGA PLAi11MING DIVE10N EPARATE DESIGN EVIEW WILL BE EOUIRED IN 'HESS AREAS DARK SITE - FEE EXHIBIT 'E` i000 SO. FT. LOTS - ME SHEET 4 rMl- K Tnu :qtr EXHimT. SCALE; LT. S . Ii- I CF45 i' -,:fir •� �� �l'1... SCUM qtr va{rra..0 ac'�av rJa 1/urir' ►/ V �..� u wp -.1— :Y sb o " VA BL 7 W' it l AJ Al CITY OF PLANNING DIVMN q; _ 1 41e��8i f 1 11'� •1 1 r 41 Elm- a.g C « A+GiAAGa •6N '' m u u u V ITEM EXHIMT: A�_ -;m 44 C V FORTH 0 , N.V.. OV m • :rim �tM•sat �r N.V.. OV m MAJOR DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS Lot Size 3000 Sq. Ft. 5000 Sq. Ft. 7200 Sq. Ft. Floor Plans I _' 3 3 Stories 1 1 1 & 2 No. of Bedrooms ( 2 BD (762 Sq. Ft.) 2 BD (857 Sq. Ft.) 3 BD (1366 Sq. Ft.) (Unit Sq. Ft.) 3 BD (915 Sq. Ft.) 3 BD (1011 Sq. Ft.) 4 BD (1602 Sq. Ft.) 4 BD (1i50 Sq. Ft.) 4 BD (1762 Sq. Ft. 2 Story) Total No. of Exterior 'variations 6 9 12 Roof Materials asphalt Shingles "Masonite" Roofing Masonite Roofing (4 colors) (i Color) (1 Color) "Hume" ;.00fing Tiles Hume Roofing Tiles (3 Colors) (3 Colors) Asphalt Shin les Asphalt Shingles (1 Color) (1 Color) Siding Masonite Siding Masonite Shingles Horizontal Woud Horizontal Lap Vertical Wood Vertical Wood Textured Stucco Heavy Textured Stucco Horizontal Lap Textured Stucco Spanish Lace Stucco No. of Units in Phase One 125 101 74 QTY OF RANCHO CUCATMONTGA PLAININING DI %'LSIQ:v nEN1. k EXIilBrr -_fS SCALE: -'TS- A E 0 CONTOUR GRADING PLAN - NO SCALE P" of z:t gvAsm - 2.1 d°Jo �mm �'� LF NNN 1�f 37 _ �i }�,q cowmwysmfrGslopri CITY car ITE:,i: K ® RAII'CHO CUCAMONGA TilU: ,/-a„V, PLAiININI \'G DIVISION EXHIBIT- r-- N_TS Z 0 Ll Q �L J v `J l� 1 I1� fT�,.'. �,•JC1r -cam Y�'i;— �._1�.'Y_��..��!'S i _ fi ^ 5EG1,fRl7-y FiFAl' eF f -22,- J,`• i'� S /TEM1"O9A,2y 19P,(6;A iGN �yS'cl W Itt l L7 1 & 0 0 0 L 0 Ts Viuef CrTY OF rrEm: >< RANCHO CLr- "OANrA. TITLE- z _y T'ArKwic pLA -NT1`i N DIVIS�IO�t EXHIBIT: n om: 171 SCHOOL MWANC 0 .A )f r L......... PARK PHASING PLAN VICTORIA WINDROWS PRELIMINARY LANDSCAOE DFWC IM CITY OF RANCHO CUCATMONGA, It MANINNNG Dl\qSK)N t- - •? Z_ NORTH rrFAM: -- K, TrrLEt FAFK, TAWEAW, mimrr: SCALE--IL t<,.- RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING CO.'r- ISSION APPROVING SITE PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW FOR PHASE I OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11934, LOCATED NORTH OF BASE LINE ROAD, WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, AND SOUTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE, A PORTION OF THE JICTORIA COrV4UNITY PLAN WHEREAS, on the 16th day of December, 1981, a complete application was filed by the William Lyon Company, applicant for the above - described project; and WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee has recommended approval of said project, with appropriate conditions; and WHEREAS, the project point rating exceeds the minimum threshold as required by the Growth Management Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION I: Findings: I. The design and layout of the proposed development is consistent witti the applicable elements of the City's General Plan, and the Victoria Community Plan. 2.. The design and layout of the proposed development will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existinq or future devel- opments, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. 3. The architecMr0 design of the proposed develop- ment is compatible with the character of the surrounding area and will create a harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated in the Victoria Community Plan and the General Plan of the City. 4. The design of the proposed development would pro- vide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neigybors through good aesthetic use of materials, text;,re and color that will remain aesthetically appealing and will retain a rbasonabiy adequate level of maintenance. 0 48 Resolution No. Page ® SECTION 2: Conditions of A royal: Site Plan and Design Review for Phase I of Tentative Tract No. 11934 is approved subject to the following conditions and attached standard conditions: 'D b 3 j Ib �J l �D C S :r s �= v 1. The developer shall comply with all conditions of approval for Tentative Tract No. 11934. 2. The Developer shall include provisions to accom- modate future front yard irrigation systems. As a ninimum, such provisions shall include the in- stallation of Schedule 40 PVC pipe loops under driveways and sidewalks. 3. All development standards established in the Victoria Planned Community Text shall be complied with. To assure that these requirements are met, a revised site plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Divisi,m prior to issu- ance of the building permits. 4. As required in the Victoria Planned Community Text, the following development standards shall be met: (a) Garage setbacks measured the back of the sidewalk must be 4' to 8' or greater than 18'. (b) All units must maintain a 15' setback from (d) Two trees per lot are required in the 7200 square foot lot area, and 1.5 trees per lot is required in the 5000 square foot area. (e) All building elevations which face a street, trail, or open space shall be upgraded with additional wood trim around windows and wood siding or plant -ons where appropriate. (f) All slopes shall be contour graded to create a natural appearance. (g) Within the 3000 square foot lot area, all property line fences between dwellings shall be provided by the developer. Resolution No. Page 3 (h) Front yard landscaping shall be provided by the Developer within the 3000 square foot lot area. 5_ The construction methods of all fences provided by the developer shal l be approved by the Building Official, prior to issuance of building permits to assure long life and low maintenance-.% of fences_ 6. Landscaping and street facing fences shall be provided by the Developer on lots within the duuble cul -de -sac (111, 112), on lots facing Street "S" across from the church site (1, 2, 181), and on the vacant lot at the southeast corner of the project (69). 7_ The variation of roof material :.call be plotted on the revised site plan submitted to the Planning Division for their approval prior to issuance of building permits. Within the 3000 square foot lot area, "Masonite" roofing and "Hume" roofing tiles shall also he used. 8. Written approval from the :authern Pacific Railroad, allowing the applicant to grt -ie within the railroad right - of-way shall be submittea to the Building Official prior to issuance of the grading p, mit. 9. A revised plan of the RV parking area must be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to issu- ance of building permits. The revised plan shall pro- vide adequate room for safe ingress and egress, turn around, and backup for large recreational vehicles. 10. The model complex in each lot size area must receive a Temporary Occupancy Permit as required y tr,City Zuni na..lbrdinance_ . _ _ DAY OF PUMNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey R;ng, Chairman ATTEST: Secretar; of the Planning Conission , U Resolution No. Page 4 I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of January, 1982, by the following vote - to -wit: .AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMKISSIONERS: tl L M _ J Y ✓ r_ ! C.— V = ' c i n VC 4 O O O « Y V � ` 4yp w •�V « V V O L_ ONL •� G Vr o _ e` O, .'y V V� rl✓O C � WN.L•} C O rp� t G e L ✓ ^ N L a l N Y �rOY y� ✓ e J- q N d V _< 4 G p �� — 6 6 N V c �cp ar J L Y ✓� p = V g w P p � V N 9 V 4� C � L q C M r C 0 4 L V ~z°C%.°,_ N Y 2 P O i w O •• L r �� V b Q _C 60 N� Op C °NL� V qO•q O ✓ C xo =� „ �w 4 ✓CO C� `� VYwy` ` �� , W _ C C L •n L✓ = r r y ✓ C 9{` LTV — q� w ° a. el8 r_✓ r '� o LV YC✓ 4V �r 2 w °Z ✓g ✓. p w✓ 3E``C yp' Lv V9 G_ Vs ° ✓ZZ pp y ww y ( y L Q� q€ D V O V L , l P Y V O °� Pr '• _ 3 D 9 �� G L G tV Na iq_ Np N Lw W.•L•LZ ry �! �y✓gxL ✓Z Nf✓ N n N N � I — N ✓ Cc 'Z y✓ L N r 0 r V ^ _ V tsO•ti C � V N V � r O C � J Y L N E V 4� G M G q P V v = 2 iE p x q- x✓ L 6 ° CO i� i`Q sw7i W pr � V w L lV. C q = ✓ ✓ L V 4.. c ' <v' _b r CO •�C= i r ` C V. `N `S Ep Q . Ofj 9E 4G L ✓_� P _w 1 C w t � O �`•�j��� dr. =°L. `tl.. w `-cY•° _•n Y ✓Sc �.°, g�d NQo § e �/ ✓fir r..Y. oq �� .'.° fi° coo M l- -t VCNV _✓ ^ N P V E pr Nr ` Y 4 ! T V L Y O L p p O V ° 1 ' C Wt Y� 94N ti pY� OI VE 00. q°� O_O > Q < L q xC �w CO J - C• X O P ^ [V� 4 J O wO r q q • L Qs + p V Y WV EX 2"; Vp> pOgL �Lp� V = J C r G O^ O° p4 �V «° Y tl Y ` PM L y w w i ^ �� •>1 p O1 L v r L �° L Y •• � aij� 1q?i •Cr✓ •••�H >N i� i�q Y�% C H i V �A J 1 L�•< x �V6 'G✓a N q 4 O G y m G g V L C ^ri j°°�•°J4 Mr T 6 = V i m = /• P rYY �P =LqY '� ` ° q y U �. V N L ✓ � � %^�+ ✓ g c M c' v u qA y Va (+ - � � ✓� �LYCa _ C r } {{{uuu Y L N q cv •� OC•. TY(y' GV� 1C r 6 i V r` 6 C q •-• c O ?ice V V C ✓ q A VD ✓w Y iO p m N = p q Z t C9 O•Ji• U�Q M C q 6 q t C G P G ✓ _ _ d N L V O q o � q v ✓ � i V O G V Q Y! O a p L ✓ N✓ O ✓ V ^ � Y __ Y % YC_ �i �.ti0 w_c� ► q �✓ �{ ✓ q N N b � •Vi• air q ` rm V r pq *L CV ga� O VG qy VYa q_ � r L Q M °> f• q - q K p V �� iVJ iOMN tM T•r�rE TN y4 c TZ �/ �{% C � u .°. •Or• L C I9 Yr 0 y Cr0« ` Iw r Aa �np wA VS r V u oL .a 'i rr 3 L °L.CNgf� O L 4 - C O i P qq•Lr.r r� w> � � u rt+u J u u c V Y..N � C• —eC�• wpm Cu N` 4 4 P 9O rL IiaV I _O ��L CPJ OV c Lv `o 0 ` ... »e L Vp ✓ �P L L L V t C 1 OT 4 • t i y _ p p — V C d u u V v 2 - .. w l= ✓_ = I r d r O A° :s a�< .°� °c c... �_ a s >o c 4 °_ Rio w r`N i q.:�o °.-.°- 2"p`p•e.r� G g V p 0 wL �y° -Y�� C(.4 LPP C_ T V V« py_ nL 6 L�G N ✓ •Y 4A r'C - V V V d� rtW Lr Lq� »Q � /{ T VLIV p V q OJYP N 9 LaVil V M•tN Cn6i NV�>I' f>�r >• J_�J °' �V/C yV Li Cto _c4 Y _. �V �� .kT V_T »V 4 6ZG C6e7 H 06 pM `O F }r Yip S_4__° `LD�asL_NO O, P � O o W ® L 2 d r Ly G Q .y Sz> pp �N 4< V N V •V•• C A V M a G .r L 4 ° y= �� .> d i C` 4 J C L« •• � N d A r 'J P Y d r L_ Y L w �• L A L v L C• } N V rA ¢ «• p Y p y ? rd 6 L — CO AY <q6 O L L ad O: O_ »Y p�M YVg rG 20 O —Cr `. 3E yVV` Vv G rdG 9 N J_ 0 V ^°.` LVL VOO_l = = wC c v •.°- wig a cL _bo � _ o V V �C• O V VO VOA CrV r` rK A V pPpO »L_N 6r ��rry� rte( ol N VO 4W` r .2«v 4 a «Y TpyO PTV O� L�[�p�>•L »» 4r. Py ■ 6V r V — Cr G �� O.y L 9WrL »rq �Y CV OCOV VL� A »r pC A P » J� w OA Nr9 Lr iV CCU C »9 V6 y9 NC.�LPPO V� V< 4 pL a qn yap .•.YA_ .O Vp�d>. _� r `.O. CC .'s •f OY —6Y •n n1JY AO .L.. l r y p by v 4 g O r V q Y _ A V9 r> 6» p C V= Y 9 9 V _ O _L L9�l�i AY > — Oa S Y i WPO.V O �uNV 6i =�V» p «p per � V� ^iQL pL_ N A » CO. SV-jLl• 6 p4 r d p� _� qy N ^1 ipP. Y r C p 3) v E .L.• ..•. r Y V a i n M` L O_ V Y V N » V L __ PY •n »« V L S r p G r •p O r V N O� r� O V i— L N p— r q v rCZ.5 rvz�24 =— :";,z e S fi P A l v. C = »T _ AV ' p�L'•a L.T .• 32 PNv 4 VVr 8D —� C N V NVC �o N C I7 U C N _d Y o r � _✓ r r° Y _ C �LU C_V = Onw ✓� V RC j r P L L ✓O�q a` ( = P it p J � � V 9 V V C _C � u q 4 •Ln O� .. � V � b r ✓ ✓ e C •V.r .• w — 9 Z j V G � P V= l Ol^ w _ O^ r i C V^ L {�j _N• ^ Y ✓ b V N •Wi. O V ^ O _• 4 V P Y 6 •rJ• IJ X V tl C 4✓ ✓ C/ . O v N 1 V y -= L9 yyy•••\\\ e1 I O_ � V� r P U — a _V S •p ^ .V.. = i� w P O� a� � p N v� 0 � ✓ L � � � y4 Y W O. u Y ✓ _O = ✓N O' DV N L P009 N� T r r r� L V � � V C b Lp ✓ L C'PC P OP `L y` OC yVV _L wqM VYJ�^C FWJ .r Z N I V�O. C V W^ S O C °� ✓g' � 5 � I tib s V 6V ° — L �•" f 7 K T1 09� �9 L = yo C 'eYV dP �� l ✓4° 9N0 L✓iNd_ N {Y 2G19 lS ^O P V ~ P9r E Z S G V q q r C 9 l' ► Y G' L l 9 O q C L � ' a 7 Y f. C ✓ b� W C P w l Y y L� O P L ` a v° y 49q OL C= P Z `w= •a•Z C 40. O_ 0,V _ p C = V ° 6r V O C r_ V O 9 r. V ✓v L r_ w L q O _ N l` r OI S N = V V O L = N ✓ ✓✓ N °mot ✓9`g1', XL %.4.r9 >-.✓ v Y4d a .o.. YL� °CY `LOV G ✓9tl 9 o° •T G�. °- a.q`�p.c o `ry Y .W.�� �n L Vl V _C 4q� 'i = MZ ' ^ a _ wL V. V . d O . •_ M4 ✓ • 0Y 4 N V ^ tl q V C x L •w G O > O � . °� � L r O N N . d O L lC N r • V pV brL 6 _�y L ✓ r V_ _ \V . VN - q .Y ^ r V x y VO l• � x � ✓P O �q C l W y`p' I1 I `I ✓ w4 �' d i 'b ^ L O z O bu qc w e 1q ^ L b r 9 C x L o 9 C L N ( GV a•0 L ^ V4 O G o � -c 70% _c 2 WO N __i y l •i• 6 ywV $V^�Oa• � P L L✓•i�_ G Lb V a(!C 0 N — Y�, y & =i ` 'Z9 ° d r r p ✓ 9 �2 % CO x L 4 V 'uO • bN V f. °b ` N 4 L OV qq SV VM O, t.•O S � —O 4V0 �� °OY �y`9j= OL9 ✓ V = q O VV Pl'J L Pf 9V N r9✓ CLV N -i T P� ^� � L �� � 1 O _NN —9L PC PV NO OD =a_ J nV0 44 pC�p y6 _ °C qq V p Lpy. pL6 Vp 9_'CC w9 p W u Tr Y LO =4 V O Y M 4C V <tl ¢Or V — N V 4 ^ 4 q Y O d q 9 ° 9 � n u � 4u • C � V b l4.n •Y.•N ^ ^C �0.4 V' PV— �9� —�� •Li��O. w0 d V l4 i. y ✓ � � � 6 q 4 ✓ � } � � f. �'w v O � ° r 4 ✓ � L ✓b 4 w 4 C ° C L C — = b V } �i N y lam_ L C V W_ •. r✓ C _ C U Y. 6 C 6 9 V u° 4� �_ C 4'.V GL +9 4 cEE SJ O�r vVV Npi•CO'�J�p V� ` _V d V�V= OG L CL'ryy✓•VL+= �L Gw"E9N 4 r O V ^ YJ� u 4 .Yd• Vx Lr qp L ^ V C °<C• �tlwQ'Y �N ` G tl4:�EV9"�9 Y 2q41z Oqy C .V 9 l VCr L✓✓V q !NV gCY`fVA V Y .O 4V ✓� �§ C��W V�.N+T✓6b^ �yEdW NrCY bbppY ztrV `��,1V Op O� � Vb VO TV �. — °VO 4EN q �4�V 9_O QV� C CVILZ t• —Nq yy p V✓ y ` C X C M 4 V 6�40?NV PYJP w �:` VPN L� r> •G ✓4 •p b L >. O• l b G E ]� 9 �O.• Q C Vy �O VN9 `�Y b�NEb e_L< < o o X Nn =i.` Tp _o> =� Y ^L. x Lr W ^a.1+ N Y P`Y �' O J4 OYNC V— br ° 9�� JC VO^ P_°yCy 4C W G =E�<•�..• ✓OGV C >L� b9 a V C f. ^q rC=V 1•j• •GOT W4J_ 94 ✓� �LG�p 6r y6O C C y V 0q4 yq �•r'J•1L C ^Lp L rVYP 12 Eo y ^Y C v Nc O.� Z.2 _ V 6 9 0 L V N 6 _9 _ O C b.•. C pr C= L. C P O N r 0. > C ••—CT • p } b Y J y ✓ bNy N4C p X_9 C�wC• 4��V G9 4 L b_Y �: vGr iGCOOr +O dL. —..y q0= L ` �K R� . . . . �Yo4rx `yy 4P JG 9 � .YLM • =— �pM ,qT= V L0C . ✓ —°✓xL=V �er L Y W +r /Y LO4'^pOY9Q . R✓L w f 1 ^^✓L V• p pWCppY w= `y ' C r •T �NCC`ELP.0 J C w W ^ LONCTO SOVC COc _•v V 6 ✓qq � C n �+ L r✓ es r—O r M . _.MY• ✓C LOV WV y S 0GNxY�VY> .. �0gw �1°r9OqO VCMVqdp N �N rz4 Vrdg oz;— Z ^E✓ � 0 O �ro VVN — _ o Y L — '_ �aw t _ ^✓Lq w q o L 6 W Vp 6 Vtl EL OT N $ z 2 .99 N6 w t _ ✓ u L C �49_pe PC v � L y R V C < 9Y NN U < ✓ C✓u V l CV Y�2 ar gCV�rN V� EO. _C �� ~ _Ar•L� — OY LGy�°Cy CCOW b i— LX'T P » N E�r4.gp ggEx $€Lra `0 A 3�`g .°o -h�ii �h CM `v; P ^� V�L�a 9004 L ^�� Lv.0.�� L•�rr+( V V° r P rS ^G4p LO NC Y•V. V Y, V•`wrL .•O• ^E.L ..V —Y =4V^ V }N V C.. Ll� —yLL `}•V �1 GNCC C�1.1 VVVIII r W LMT_ LCYpy�� Lyi VyC L' Y� WC � OC _C =V oOgXOrr CVG H__> FLrr y� �YO G W 4 >°pE{ Vp °pV N 6V <i0 6V YI wOi tlY Y Y _ W gO iy1i � .^e O O. C e& C L. 9 O i 4 V a =� MQ N L V P p � j l Lx� QV 1 O L � Y q y yO M � L O C � N V L ` O L 4 p r q O �L li J V 4 w .J6 4 y 4 9 p o� M O �v V= .g N L LC ° 9 N V oa m T (v� 9 p D.� �F 9 p 0. 9 C d J: L U z� � N iV Y LAP 1 W O� i V L L � V t c� 1� C m C N 9 C V VD W O V O K= Y V < G r ° r p Vp y 4 V M ¢ N u Vp L � P D.O ` uL L ^ V C Y y O G L. V � Y x= Vy�N C4 W j O O q C 4I =i N 7 C � y i V C_ M d✓ i J � pz C 4 L 0 pN b ✓ T O 'O � Y` a C 4 r L L4N u ° r C C r .Q P L d q eFy'� L �G �yN Cr r p L_9 4 V I L O L a¢ c C V r ✓ Y gO C rro y P .ti IL'a •6 V p _ V 1 4yP O^ O r r< L r• � V N N � V7N p W4 O� r P9 k �•• r IFS � ` p q O i O V O � V• C� � W �J N 9 V O J< s <L V^ y V V V V C $� xc a °may Uzi 4 L p� C CV LW N VLY Q e i tV-zzy O .ri f q C V V w N u i V c a r T ¢ u aP+ CVy 9Wy9pL p ((L��VL p xvo eu` O.r y� ^r G^ Co. ,Ty C L V p y 1 N \V ¢r� YOIVNL 4P�r w1 C LuiwO 9 -rV +[ 4l L n P q`^ M p9 xL Y� G _Cu I 4Y C x p N Nnp M_LO V_ 4 9 ' w Z C 6 d e � Y w VLCi P S N 17 C Y Y L L : r ✓ M C L •� V Y L V T V^ Npw Oar 1 v w. N O Or q C yy W V q¢ ^ t V 6r V V u 3. p /gip �I ✓V �O^ .L. V.�e �¢ ° LL'^° 1 'V L Zz 1 I i � L_ J J� ` � L O c O Y ` O W ✓ V ° � r O x N 4 W r C ^¢ Y` r b ✓ u w � :5 Jr N N V V Y V r w 5z .. ^ N N V= Cj � p 4� P^ w p N a � ✓ 9 L V 9 9 N V L� N V O C r p r C L r r YCi V � W ` y _ L l 4 V ypL� U p x r 4 r L ✓ V 9 y W w Yr °p ZEE �N W L C rc T o�c 4p °o .d.oLC g +5 4£ «" Z NY L r °a �g v� "° L VVp ` FV _o °W•n �... p CC 1rL °� >' �✓ 9 9� rb 4^ Q" OS \L�r Si y 4 rC d✓ y✓ ^L M LJJ N Lp Y V q _ y °C9 �wfw <r 4` C C` ¢ PN L zL 1 C` wV q L w Or La `a yv �C'e x x � 9 ✓ VNV p ML rr �C �r z' == yP GOO` n. V WV -z yYi � Z- o IO N p�.rr 6 eV ` r/pO LQQ TC 1•,�L arp r r C>. ^� ^S _ ¢L O Y✓ �" G9 _ „V V V < r y b Q V L � r T ` G x N r }p9 r F w ✓ I O+ r V 9 <-5 v�Vr= VV4 Y • J .^e O O. C e& C L. 9 O i 4 V a =� MQ N L V P p � j l Lx� QV 1 O L � Y q y yO M � L O C � N V L ` O L 4 p r q O �L li J V 4 w .J6 4 y 4 9 p o� M O �v V= .g N L LC ° 9 N V oa m T (v� 9 p D.� �F 9 p 0. 9 C d J: L U z� � N iV Y LAP 1 W O� i V L L � V t c� 1� C m C N 9 C V VD W O V O K= Y V < G r ° r p Vp y 4 V M ¢ N u Vp L � P D.O ` uL L ^ V C Y y O G L. V � Y x= Vy�N C4 W j O O q C 4I =i N 7 C � y i V C_ M d✓ i J � pz C 4 L 0 pN b ✓ T O 'O � Y` a C 4 r L L4N u ° r C C r .Q P L d q eFy'� �G �yN Cr y p L_9 rE V I L O L a¢ c C V r ✓ Y gO C rro L G .ti IL'a •6 V •L _ V 1 4yP O^ O r r< L r• � V N N � V7N p W4 O� r P9 k �•• r IFS � ` p q O i O V O � V• C� � W �J N 9 V O J< VY <L V^ C � � C 4 i ✓ C_ M d✓ i J � < 0 r r T O it L �I u C r C C r .Q io% eFy'� �G eN_.a N L4 u�2 a CC q^ a¢ C C V r ✓ Y gO C rro .ti IL'a •6 Q_ F~ W N C � � C 4 i ✓ � M d✓ i J � < Y ` rQL r r L r Y u C r C C r io% eFy'� eN_.a N L4 u�2 _O� q^ a¢ C C V r ✓ gO C rro L p W4 ✓P � q O i O V O � V• C� � W �J N 9 V O J< r p y V V V V C 2 V C xc a °may Uzi 4 p� CV LW N VLY N tV-zzy O L V V q C V Y V V w N u i V c a r T ¢ u CVy 9Wy9pL p ((L��VL p xvo eu` O.r y� ^r G^ Co. ,Ty C L V p y 1 N \V ¢r� YOIVNL 4P�r w1 C LuiwO 9 -rV ^W`11 4l L Tr q`^ _Cu M¢ Vr LN 4rpVpV M_LO V_ 4 V Y ' w Z C 6 d e � V O. V V P ✓ P S Y Y L L : r ✓ M C L •� V Y L V T V^ Npw Oar 1 v w. N O Or q C yy W V q¢ ^ t V 6r V �I •I 1 I i i i V 6 1 6 O QTY Cp r yV OV y ` y L.Y V b�0�• ��yyY C�•L Y 9 4 C_y eCyyeV � G ° _^OL L Y rV VSC L rgcb Y °4EL v C= V L C ���jiii N O y `�O G saga s i VV. L O n n O V r i• l . v G ✓ G� G C yN qL O �• i N _ 4 q _p 6 L O L J � Y V yL _4 QlT i i E Y OO �• L >o OV_ Y os� _ L I 0 A q 2 43 s � O n CP. 1r y IV O ifO V_ O 2_.. `-C 1 b r�4q c r Gbp L V V V�V)0 < O V O II it 0 .no V V �- �( ^V Ilk, <C•i.• � �l�•4 d byq O V vv � V •n V L r q -Y V Ny� � q r ` Y✓ qC � r V z T t TV N i O L qqV = q_ �p Vr C�•C ��p �y �n u.b ONp�p V a e�q•/ ELF Oti •TVO w 4 G �} L. M V� C q •^ C ppV4 V L pw �� e Y O L G °Te CV rbe Z.. ya Y �Vnp LV L CY fy ASV^ TLUV qlV 4'V YY i�CPC� C1011 LpY� yL� 4M q0�C4 -4z- OO.SCq V q�9 L C O CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT 1982 T0: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Deveiopment BY: Dan Coleman, Assistant'Planner SUBJECT: REFERRAL OF GRADING AND WALL PIAN Fn2 TFNTATTVF T SUMMARY: The Applicant has submitted for Building Permit plan check. The Sit- man and Tentative Tract Map were approved by the Planning Commission based upon a grading concept which is now proposed to be changed. The final Grading Plan proposes a combined retaining and block wall of up to 18', in places, in height along the railroad right -of -way to the south of the project. The issue is that if the Site Plan depended upon a grading concept that cannot be maintained, should the Site Plan be revised, pos- sibly redesigning the site to eliminate the need for this wall. S�aff feels that this is a substantial change in the approved project which does not meet the Conditions of Approval. Because of the significance of this wall, Staff is seeking guidance from the Planning Commission on this issue. BACKGROUND: This project, as shown on Exhibit "A" was approved by the Planning Commission on December 22, 1980. Attached for your information are copies of the Staff Report and excerpts from the Resolution of Approval and Conditions. As stated in the Staff Report, the Negative Declaration and the Tentative Tract Map were approved contingent upon mitigation of grading concerns. The project design required a major change in natural slope. The approved Conceptual Grading Plan, Exhibit_ "B ", depended upon construction of a 2:1 slope approximately 10' wide on the railroad right - of -way to the south. As per the Conditions of Approval, this slope re- quired an easement from the railroad company, which the Applicant could not obtain. Therefore, the final Grading Plan was altered to include a retaining wall, with a 6' sound attenuation wall on top, to eliminate the need for a slope. As shown on the wall profile, Exhibit "C ", the wall will vary in height from 6' up to 18' along the railroad side. ANALYSIS: The Site Plan requires extensive cut and fill grading. To maintain usable (not in slope) rear yards for the fifteen units along the south project boundary, the grade difference between the project site and the railroad land was made up with a slope outside the project boundary. Therefore, the project design depended upon the slope. If ITEM L Grading and Wall Plan Referral Planning Commission Agenda January 13, 1982 Page 2 the slope cannot be built, then the Conditions of Approval also cannot be met unless the Commission finds that the use of the retaining wall is in keeping with the intent of the project. The retaining wall concept was presented to the Design Review Committee. The Design Review Committee felt the wall would be all right if vines were planted at the base of the wall. If the Commission finds that the wall is not in accor- dance with the original approval, the Site Plan would have to be significantly revised and would probably cause an entirely new project. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission review the information provided and provide Staff with direction on this issue. Respectfully submitted,, JACK LAM, AICP Director of Community Development JL: DC: j r Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Plan Exhibit "B" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "C" - Wall Profile December 22, 1980 Staff Report Excerpts from the Resolution of Approval and Conditions 0 Y ' t S r � d: I rea.arc �4 - L e i • 3� q �, �_ ,1•. pi i i .. • s w' �+P' « p.. _.1 f . IBS � -••fir_ 'p \ � aaC � 1 . �, n• Y i h `mod n:i 1 art• le I• fq� r ,1 i�_I •C'+ ° � / • COa �,'�� Y .. airr .r, (eoeao�• e: a.wwww I_ ._ � L arraruJaraa- 1••rev a!:•IVre•1• _ •fl w.ra WT OI.yY•tiI . ..F�• _ „D P � � a+ar s•a.,rz) aaca�sr a.aaa. � . �I i / /�•\, ,/ w..cOarat w•ae acsss'• m ' -L �Ja �wi- -7r /' 1V71L( TOI aAYif OT Ta Mr�..Y Wad w /�� •1•a6y4 AW Mu/{i w• araae«� �•+ /, � M•IW1s Cr+a•ea•r.q �MNM/W.f•IAMJ! .�aartl. � a:as.ro� •f lraaarar^ asuTe ✓.rr:•a:aW �o /ra�•a,_�aaaarr ti�� ./ 1 � a.raroa cua..• aws ra X.•w✓as pa1IIOaYMaa' i - .� �.� A►� �4 a�rwt ao/ we !� eC�a trtws 0 4wr ••` t6 \\`Qtyaa/ � a�c�va..► w+rirvr ✓Yo Y —... � / ,�� ,44ffaR�naJ C�all�t"warr aar Rnaefa alYbe �IfM.•f M1>ba. ISaM•�Ot f%i /4R rIT K1.YC May. f.t._wfl d( 1K/ba !VSRTJ.C1� +Drs..: FoaNa /.4s,s.(rxrvw) • •na w. w ..ears etir .a,w. C U �•� BASE LINE 4 _ •, LOT A' Iz -' .S ::• +\ -�L1�n iI •'•1 LS 111.1:1: ��.'' Z., �'/��:�1 •f —� 1 yz�•'rl /�' (� �'Itc A Gr• da.. . k. �. �I fr j i I .v.•a.�.4 �� I 7kT.:TIVE TRACT =11605 "'a- •'«"« r•.re•r.w..wocy�.vp�esw. ANAGAL ENCINEERIN6 CO. ..r..yr►..r iy.6Y. V19INlry ,VAP .r G J. 10 L _ .. 1 I 7kT.:TIVE TRACT =11605 "'a- •'«"« r•.re•r.w..wocy�.vp�esw. ANAGAL ENCINEERIN6 CO. ..r..yr►..r iy.6Y. V19INlry ,VAP .r G J. 10 11 E iryar /0ll L O Lul 1 CL. Cn-Y OF RAI\O ii � GL'CJ�•.. ,ANGA STAFF, T -EPORi DMTC: December 22, :980 TO: Planning Commission 1977 FROM: Barry K. Hoga.i, City Planner BY: Otto Kroutil, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRON14ENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTP�IVE TRACT NO. 11605 - NUBANK - A total development and a subdivision of 6. 4 acres into 66 lo ts, comprising 65 townhouse units in tie proposed R -3 zone, generally located south of Base Line Road, ;I the west side of Hellman - APN 208 - 011 -02, 03, and 04 Related Item: Zone Change No_ 80.13 BACI;GROUID: Tne applicant is requesting review and apporval of a total development consisting of 65 townhouse units ci 6.4 acres of land located on the :•rest side of Hellman Avenue, south of Base Line Road (Exhibit "A ")_ The subject site is currently zoned A -P (administrative - professional), however, a zone change to R -3 (multi- family residential is being requested by the applicant in conjunction with this application The zone change has also been placed on the Commission's Agenda for rev ew and consideration_ The site development plans, as submitted by the applicant, indicate a residential density of approximately 10 units per acre. The Interim General Plan indicates medium density of 5 -15 units per acre, the proposed General Plan also desig- nates this site for medium density residential 5 -14 units per acre_ The pro- posed density is, therefore, consistent with bosh land use designations_ With the exception of a single family residence. the project site is currently vacant, and is surrounded by the following land uses. Site North East South West LAND USE ZONING Vacant /one single family residence A -P to be removed- Vacant/one single family -esidence A -P to be removed. Service Station / vacant A -P Citrus Grove / singie family residence R -1 City Park /sIngie family residence R -1 This project has been reviewed and rated by the Design Review and Growth Manage- ment Review Committees in accordance withthe Residential Assessment System and the Growth Management Ordinance. The project reveived a total point rating of 79.3 and met ali minimum point categories within the rating system. As a result, the project is eligable for Planning Commission Review_ (i En Planning Commission Staff Report -2- December «, :~20 ANALYSIS: As noted above, the project will consist of 65 two -story townhouse units- Each dwelling will have a 2 -car attached garage, and a private fenced patio. The unit mix will be as follows. U%TT TYPE SIZE N0. OF UNITS Plan 1 2 bed, 2 bath 1,300 sq. ft. 16 Plan 2 2 bed, 2� bath, den 1.475 gt. 18 Plan 3 3 beed, 3 bath 1,650 so. ft. 20 Plan 4 3 bed, 21� bath, der. 1,825 sq. ft. 11 According to plans, the dwellings :::ll be clustered in rows of tip to 7 units each, arranged around a common recreational area and circulation system. In addition to the 2 -car garages, 37 open guest parking spaces will be provided on ® site. The entrance to the project is shown off Base Line Road, approximately 300 feet west of Hallman Avenue. The applicant indicates that the two remaining sites located between the proposed townhouses and Base Line Road will be developed in the future for administrative - professional uses. In order to satisfy fire district requirements for a secondary emergency access, a 24 foot %,;-de emergency drive is proposed off the Southern Pacific right -of -way in the southeast portion of the site. The applicant indicates that the railroad has virbally consented and that its property be used for emergency access purposes. Due to time con- straints, the applicant was unable to secire a formal agreement prior to the hearing; he will be required to obtain emergency access rights from the railroad as a condition of approval prior to final map recordation. However, if for some reason such an agreement cannot be obtained, the applicant indicates that an alternate emergency access drive can be provided off Hellman Avenue (see Exhibits "B" & "C"). The Design Review Committe reviewed tale building elevations and architectural design of the project and was very satisfied with the style Mondon Mews ") of the buildings. The Committee did recommend that a brick accent or cap be in- corporated into the design of the chimneys. Colored renderings and elevations will be available for review and comment at the Planning Commission meeting. The developer is proposing to provide, and received point credit for, the following special features within this development: -! fib ✓ \'�� ' .. -_ Planniny Commission -3- December 22, 1930 Staff Report - Solid core exterior doors and security deadbolts - Other security devices, such as tempered glass in strategic locations, 5 foot high rod -iron gates at all patios, and appropriate lighting. - All units will be preplumbed for solar water heating - An option will be provided to potential home buyers to purchase solar collectors for %zter heating Attached is Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant. The Com- missiun will note that three items on page I -3 have been checked off as "yes" and require to be addressed: Item .`.I The to a in accordance with the Grading Committee recommendations To further mitigate the effects of grading, it will be required that all slope banks in excess of S feet in vertical height, and 5:1 greater slopes be landscaped and irrigated in accordance with the slope planting requirements of the City. Item =4 The zone change necessary for the development of this project is consistent with both the Interim and the Proposed General Plan Land Use designations. Item 5 The project will result in the removal of a number of trees (Elm, Eucalyptus and Avacado). The applicant will be required to retain existing mature trees wher^ver possible. A master plan of existing trees showing their precise location, size and type shall be com- pleted and submitted for approval to 4be Planning Division prior to approval of the final grading plan. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the Environmental Checklist, and found no significant adverse impacts on the environment, provided the above mitigation measures are incorporated into the final design of this pro- ject. A Negative Declaration_ conditioned upon the successful mitigation of the above concerns would therefore be recor amended. CORRESPONDEMCE: A notice of public hearing was placed in the Daily Report newspaper. To date, no correspondence for or against the project has been received by the Planning Division. REC01TIENDATION: It is recommended that the Plannin; COmlission review the proposed project and tentative map, and consider all public comments. If 0 Planning Commission -4- ( Staff Report December 22, 1980 after the public hearing, the Commission concurs with the findings and proposed conditions of approval recommended by Staff, then a motion to adopt the attached Resolution o. Approval, with conditions, rrrjld be appropriate_ Respectfully submitted, Barry ,?C: ;Ho a ra/ .City Planner BM:OY,: cd A ttacKments Y. RESOLUTION NO. 80 -89 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 11605. WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 11605, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Nubank International, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a total development of 6.4 acres comprising of 65 townhouse units in the A -P zone (pending zone change tc R -3) generally located south of Base Line on the west side of Hellman - APN 208 - 011 -02, 03 & 04 into 66 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on December 22, 1980; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map sut-ject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. ?SOU, THEP,EFORE, t;,e Planning Cormission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 11605 and the Map thereof:.- (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed genEral and specific plans; - Zb) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed genera; and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 0 u 11 iution uo. ou oy 2 P (g} That this project will net create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 11605, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: Planning Division 1. Slopes shown as exceeding 2:1 rate must not exceed 1 3/4:1. 2. Slope at west boundary between lots 33 and 37 to be selected for surface erosion control and to be fully established prior to occupancy. 3. A sl 4. Emergency access rights shall be obtained from the Southern Pacific Transportation Company to provide secondary emergency vehicle access into the gate in accordance with Foothill Fire District repuirements. In the event such access cannot be obtained across the Railroad property, alternate emergency access, acceptable to the Fire District and the Director cf Community Development, shall be prcvided elsewhere on site. 5. Automatic sprinklers, or other means of fire protection acceptable to the Fire District, shall be required for structures located along the southeasterly boundary of the project. 6. Precise plans, indicating the treatment of landscaping and walls along Hellman Avenue, shall be subject to approval by the City Planner. Innovative use of landscane and other materials is encouraged. 7. A noise attenuation wall shall be constructed along the Railroad right -of -way. Design of such wall, its height, precise location, and materials shall be subject to approval by the City Plarrer prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Engineering Division 3. At the time of underground utility installation and prior to installation of street improvements, the developer shall contact the appropriate cable television company for the area and make arrangements which would give the company the opportunity to install cable at the,time of trenching. If the cable television company does not install cable, then the developer shall install conduit and pull boxes throughout the tract. Such details shall be shown and verified on the improvement plans. • 0 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 13, 1982 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development BY: Dan Coleman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: VIDEO GAMES AND ARCADES SUMMARY: At the direction of City Council, Staff has prepared an informational report on video games and arcades. Many cites are experiencing the growth of arcades and the concerns they raise. In particular, West End Cities have been hit hard, since Los Angeles County adopted a moratorium on new arcades. Numerous inquiries have been received by Staff during the past year concerning the possibility of arcades in neighborhood shopping centers. The attached letters are examples of requests to amend the Zoning Ordinance to allow video or "game arcades" in the C -1 zone. Therefore, Staff conducted a survey to determine how other cities are dealing with video games and arcades. Game arcades are an amusement enterprise currently permitted only in the C -2 zone, and are not listed as a permitted use in the C -1 zone. The purpose of this report is to inform the Commission of the issues involved and the available options for this use. It is intended to provide the Commission the opportunity to comment on these issues Prior to any amendments or new Ordinance. The Commission's ideas will be forwarded to the City Council for further direction. ARCADES AND REGULATIONS IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA: Arcades and video games car, be found in many places: restaurants, pizza parlors, convenience markets, liquor stores, movie theaters, and shopping center arcades. The Rancho Cucamonga Zoning Ordinance permits amusement enterprises only in the 0-2 zone (General Business District). To open an arcade (four or more machines) in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a business- man needs to find a commercial building zoned C -2 and obtain a valid business license. There are three such arcades within the City: two on Foothill Boulevard, and one on Base Line. Because individual com- mercial businesses want to provide video games for the enjoyment of their customers, an administrative policy was established to allow up to three video games as an incidental use to the primary business. Attached as Exhibit "A", is a list of the businesses (other than arcades) within Rancho Cucamona3 which provide video games in addition to their primary use. ITEM M Video Games and Arcades Planning Commission Agenda January 13, 1982 Page 2 SURVEY OF OTHER CITIES: Staff conducted a survey of surrounding communities to provide some examples of how other cities are dealing with video games and arcades. Like Rancho Cucamonga, the West End Cities surveyed are experiencing a demand for new arcades because of their increased popularity and the spiil- over from the LA County moratorium on new arcades. Also attached are newspaper articles on recent actions on arcades by Montclair and Ontario and cities in Los Angeles and Orange Counties. Both Upland and Chino prohibit arcades in neighborhood shopping centers, but are permitted in other commercial zones. Existing arcades in these communities were not a problem, according to staff planners. The City of Ontario requires a Conditional Use Permit for arcades in all commercial zones. In Ontario, several requests for arcades in shopping centers have been turned down based upon complaints from nearby residents of possible loitering and crime problems. Recently, the Monte air Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit or, an arcade located in a neighborhood shopping center near an elementary and junior high school. It has since been appealed by nearby residents and school officials. The Montclair example is significant because the conditions placed on the CUP are the most extensive regulations of any community surveyed. The conditions were recommended by Staff and approved by the Planning Commission to resolve city concerns. The following is a summary of the key conditions: 1. Hours of operation were limited to after school hours to prevent truancy (in this case, 4 p.m.). 2. An adult supervisor is required to be present at all times. 3. Adequate interior waiting areas shall be provided. 4. The maximum number of machines was limited to 20 (the amount requested by the applicant). 5. The applicant was required to ensure that outside loitering does nct occur. 6. Change making must be available to customers. 7. Two parking spaces in front of the arcade are to be reserved for bicycle racks. 8. Adequate lighting shall be provided at night. 9. 10. The use should not produce excessive noise which becomes a nuisance. No alcoholic beverages shall be sold on the premises. Video Games and Arcades Planning Commission Agenda �.. January 13, 1482 Page 3 ARCADE PROS AND CONS: Proponents cf arcades view them as harmless enter- tainment in a safe environment. Arcade owners feel that this use keeps the youth off the street, thus reducing youth - related crime problems. When properly supervised and managed, arcades are not objectionable according to arcade operators. Critics say that the sudden increase in video games has created new problems for communities. Parents are fearful of their children skipping school and spending their lunch money to play the games. Residents complain about noise, drug, and alcohol problems from loitering youth. Businessmen complain that video arcades attract unruly youth that scare off customers. Because of these problems, some communities have passed moratoriums on video arcades while studying the issues and preparing special regulatory Ordinances. Based upon the survey results, many cities are requiring Conditional Use Per- mits for the operation of arcades in commercial zones as a way of dealing with anticipated problems. Since arcades are a relatively new use, it is too soon to tell if that process is effective. ® ANALYSIS: There are three basic questions with regard to the current Zoning Ordinance regulations: (1) where should arcades be located; (2) are special regulations needed for arcade uses and, if so, what should these be; and, (3) should other businesses be aiiowed to have video games as an incident use. �J Nti?. Proper Location : Rancho Cucamonga's Ordinance contains two commercial zones: the C -1 zone (Neighborhood Business District) and the C -2 zone (General Business District). The Zoning Ordinance states that the purpose of the C -1 zone is for small, limited shopping centers intended to meet neighborhood shopping needs. Further, such centers are subject to the following conditions: 1. The architectural and general appearance of all commercial buildings and grounds shall be in keeping with the character of the neigh- borhood and shall not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare of the community in which it is located. 2. Enterprises which produce or cause any dust, gas, smoke, fumes, odors, or vibrations that in the opinion of the Planning Commission are detrimental to other property in the neighbor- hood or to the welfare of the occupants are not permitted. Video Games and Arcades Planning Cc.�'uaission Agenda January 13, 1982 Page a Based on these purposes, the code could be amended to permit arcades in the C -1 zone and remain consistent with the purpose of the zone; however, Staff would not recommend allowing this use in the C -1 zone without a CUP require- ment. Arcades are already permitted in the C -2 zone, but it may be appropriate that a CUP procedure be adopted for the use because of the unique characteristics. 2. Re ulations: The existing laws of Rancho Cucamonga do not prove e a way to deal with the operating characteristics of arcades. Uses which are traditionally controversial or Potential nuisances, normally require the review and apprc;•al of a Conditional Use Permit. The purpose of the Conditional Use Permit process is to provide the opportunity for Public review and evaluation. It is intended to mitigate potential Problems and to provide for placement of conditions on a site specific basis. However, the standard CUP notification pro- cedures are limited because they require only that �ro_perty owners within 300' be noticed. This becomes a problemin neighborhood shopping or strip commercial centers because surrounding businesses do not receive notice, except by newspaper legal ad. In addition to requiring a Conditional Use Permit for a specific use, an Ordinance can include precise performance standards for arcades. This could include things such as adult supervision, hours l,f operation, noise attenuation, bicycle parking ' lighting security and distances from schools, residences or liquor stores. Some or all of these Performance standards can be required for all arcades or applied on a site specific basis. 3. Incidental Use: The last question to be answered is whether oth businesses should be allowed to provide video games as an incidental use. Presently we have been allowing up to three machines per business as an accessory use. Other com- munities have allowed up to a maximum of four video games per business. Normally the business uses its discretion to de- termine the amount of machines, within these limits, which the business can handle without becoming a nuisance to the primary use. By allowing any businesses this use, it must be recognized that it is difficult to regulate the location of video machines. As a result, machines could be provided in businesses that would not be a desirable place for youths. such as liquor stores. If the City feels this is a legitimate use, then Staff recommends clarification of such incidental uses for businesses other than arcades. Video Games and Arcades Planning Com ii sicr. Agenda January 13, 1982 Page 5 OPTIONS: To address the three questions raised, several options are avail - ab e. We would like to receive the Commission's opinion in regards to the issues raised in this report and the following options: 1. The City could maintain its present regulations which list amusement enterprise as a permitted use in the C -2 zone only. This option would preclude any arcades from being established in the neighborhood commercial centers. 2. The City could amend the Zoning Ordinance, such as allow- ing amusement enterprises in the C -1 znd C -2 zones with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit, Dlus clarify the inci- dental use of video games for other businesses. Other vari- ations of this amendment could be made to the Zoning Ordinance to regulate video games according to the desires of the City. 3. A comprehensive Arcade Ordinance could be developed to address ® as much or as little of the issues raised in this report. This option would require direction on the types of regulations de- sired in the Ordinance. In addition, the City may consider adopting an emergency Ordinance to place a moratorium on the establishment of any new arcades. This would allow time for the Preparation of a new Ordinance. CONCLUSION: As can be seen from the experiences of other West End Cities, video arcades can become an emotional issue having many facets. Rancho Cucamonga's present Ordinance regulations do not contain very comprehensive provisions to address all the facets of arcade use. The Commission's ideas on this topic are valued. We anticipate that your input will provide direction on how arcades may be addressed in Rancho Cucamonga. Respectfully sugmittedj JACK LAM, AICP Di -ector of Community Development JL: DC: j r Attachments: Exhibit "A' - Non - Arcade Businesses With Video Games Exhibit "d" - Arcade Survey Letters requesting Zoning Ordinance Amendment EXHIBIT "A" NON- ARCADE BUSINESSES WITH VIDEO GAMES 1. 7 -11 - 9454 Base Line - 3 2. Barro's Pizza - 9653 Base Line - 3 3. Circle Y. Market - 10110 Foothill - 2 4. Don:it Shop - 8609 Base Line - 2 5. Euclid Donuts - 9465 Foothill - 3 6. Pizza Royal - 8671 Base Line - 4 7. Rocky's New York Pizzeria - %',5 Foothill - 3 8. Roller City - 8874 Foothill - 8 9. Stater Brother - 8770 Base Line - 1 10. Stater Brothers - 9750 19th Street - 2 11. Stop & Go Market - 6760 Carnelian - 3 12. Straw Hat Pizza - 8710 19th Street - 5 13. Sunrize Liquor - 8679 Base Line - 2 14. Town & Country Liquor - 9794 19th Street - 4 15. Village Donuts - 9655 Base Line - 2 16. Von's - 8773 19th Street - 1 0 11 EXHIBIT "B" ARCADE SURVEY October 1981 ONTARIO - Gary Mitchell (714) 986 -1151 - Present Code requires CUP in ali commercial zones - Administrative policy is to permit up to 3 machines in any business without CUP - The following criteria were developed for selection of arcade locations: 1. Prohibit in C -2 (Central Business District) 2. Minimum 1000 feet from schools 3. Minimum 300 feet from liquor stores 4. Adult supervisor present at all times 5. Bicycle racks shall be provided 6. Adequate sound attenuation provided in multi- tenant buildings - Planning Commission recommended these criteria to City Council; never adopted by City Council. - City Council. denied CUP for arcade because it did not conform to ® draft regulations listed above. MONTCLAIR - Hal Frederickson (714)626 -8571 - Present Code requires CUP for commercial recreation in all commercial zones. - Administrative policy permits up to 4 machines in any business without CUP (same as LA County). - No applications have bee^ processed in neighborhood shopping centers. - City concerned with proximity to schools, adult supervison, hours of operation, loitering, and drug use. - Presently have 2 arcades, both located on the Montclair Plaza grounds. UPLAND - Steve Kabel (714)982 -1352; ext. 24 - Game arcades classified as indoor recreation centers. - Permitted in C -3 and C -4 (intensive commercial). - Have not experienced any problems with existing arcades. CHINO - Gary Collins (714)627 -7577 - Permitted in C -1 and C -2 zones - Not permitted in C -N (neighborhood commercial) - Perm t up to 4 machines without City review - Have not experienced problems with existing arcades �r A WMAUNITY DEVEI.OPMENT DEPT. UDC :'U 1�aS AM PM 718191i Uil2ili2t3i/i5t6 TO THE CITY PLANNING t_•O }IMISSIO;, 9320 BASELINE ROAD P.O. BOX 807 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,. CALM• °1730 ATTEN: MEMBERS 5 STAFF o� . U December 24, 1921 As prospective arcade owners: wo !,(•sieve that for the many reasons•to follow,that the City Pld:ining Commission should make a positive recommendation to the City Council,to change the current city ordinance that wou1(I allow a family arcade in the C -1 zoning areas. 0 Currently the kids and young aciuits in the Alta Loma area have a very li ^sited selection of oritortain:nent to choose from. We took the time to interview some of t.t :c reople in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, mostly in -he Alta Loma area, and found an overwhelming response to want a f.,miily arcade. Many people agreed that idle hands are the devils work: :1,op in that far too many arrests are being made ::inze the: kid:: i:ave little else to do. It seems that the law cnforuc -nwnt ;l.J ^;: i.c s are kept busy by handling calls of vandall-SMS, burglaries and the rising rates Of loitering. _. It is the opinion of this writer and the future arcade he represents that a family arcade coul,! eliminate some of these crimes by giving the kids a plar_e to go that could keep them o.. the streets and out of trouble. The reasoning. behind a C -1 zoning location is because of its easy access by kids and to prevent them from having to travel great distances just for entertainment. It would be our hop, that an arcade would also give them something more positive to spond their money on besides the many drugs in the schools today. There are those people who feel that an arcade may increase the chances of crime and other rolatecl problems. However we have done considerable research in the Oran;e County area and have noted that an arcade can be run without any problems in the community if kept und( >r con -taut supervis -ion. Also the Owners should provide sonic form of !:ecurity guard service that would make patrols of the surruusiding area asking the loiterers to move along insid,c. 0 Continue >d, Page 2 There are also some people :rho ft•ar t it.:t the kids will cut school to go to the arcades, howov,•r this issu_ can be resolved by allowing the arcades to operut:..• .?!:ly during non- school hour:. Finally we feel that an area, -o nli increase business and merchant sales throughout the C -1 z and thereby benefiting everyone in the community_ In li4ht of the foregoing discussion we feel that it is justifiabl,2 to c:hjn.;<, the current city ordinance in order to allow the ar�:a,les within the C -1 zoning, even if under a conditional use p-rmit, rather than to totally dc. thin comm-anity of all tht! I,c•c, t its obtained through an arcade. 0 Very truly yours, ^arnvs Gillette (714) 523 -2966 (714) 527 -8853 Business hours Evenings c_.G3 Cantxs A ce"Sicn a' Sdoa Inc. ;;cdendc aeacr.. CaMor^ia =775 elecnc: e: - 2.:633 October 29, 1981 Mr. Jack Lam CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9320 "C" Baseline Road P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Jack: _, ! �` r 9 �r 0V9 LtiY OF RANC".G'CUCANIO M cc :fimunrry E-E%00?JInT DEPT OCT 30 1931 rVIA Fa i�8eQo xma,%Li ;53� } In rc --ponso to our conversation Wednesday 10/28, I 'would like to tell you a little about Sega Enterprises, Inc. and our proposed use at the Alpha Beta Shopping Center at 19th and Carnelian St-eets. Sega Enterprises, Inc. is a division of Gulf + Western Industries. We are expanding a new and excitin,7 family entertainment concept called P.J. Pizzazz Fam:ly Fun Centers. Our existing unit is located on the Eastland Shopping Center in West Covina and we halve units under construction in Garden Grove and Puente Hill. The P.J. Pizzazz concept combines food (Pizza,- pasta, sandwiches, salad bar, soft drincs, etc., plus beer and win--) with many varied games and a-:usement devices. There are party rooms, a large video projection screen, live entertainment stage area, a(!ul! area, remote controlled robot and kiddie ride.:. The restaurant area seats approximately 250 persons :.nd the video game area contains about 100 games. Cur experience at our Uest Covina location has been very gratifying. We are enjoying excellent community acceptance with a very low incidence of any problems concerning young people. As we discussed, Jack, I would lice to ask you to convey our concept to your fellow staff members and we will then arrange to meet you at '.].J. Pizzazz's next week and give you the "grand tour ". Sincerely, 6� Don Paulin Development Representative DP:ljc J OV• ter"' N �6 �• qyp Rpi1C`0 CUC T 0 �;di� Usit �'f DEt:t DP:AEN DEP *. RM 224iB6 X October 6, 19851 '_r. - _ichael 'Valr4n, Sr. Planner Flanniag Division 9320 -C Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91701 Dear .:r. lairin: l was in contact with one of Sour planners regarding the C -2 zone _needed for a Same arcade in the Citfi. I am reauestinz that you take :¢y request to the =laznsing Co=ission for a zoning ordinance asrend:nent. The amendnert regarding the shcgping center on the South -nest corner of Basalir_e and Carnelian shown as tun Sze .soaping Center. I have talked with :`rank and 'Mel owners of the center and they are in fav >r of aa. ^ing a game arcade located in their center. The sr --ade would have regular hours from 12 noon to 10:00 pm Sunday thru rrarsdas and open till 11:00 pm on Friday and Saturday. ?here would be a fall tune adult attendmt at the arcade at all times. Thank you for your time and consideration. T_ .fill be awaits= your reply. Sim =ae: e1Y, Keith H. ',athahs 7822 Alta Cuesta Dr. Rancho Cucamonga.. CA. 91730 985 -7597 C C 4`Uti � i c: �,.; cue �1, , �- i� �. �� .C. Q GEC 2l' �•�. i �- `c�v,�� �•�-} stir, _ Ctii cc�c�.� O c. �h� C�ne�^ c� �c�se1•.c�� o„�nd Ccr- «� \:c,c1 :,.:o�.4d �t c;� ��'�, -�� __ ._ c�ssz�r.. .i o-�•r _ �e.; ; �-eec. >�e•: -�' S c �d .�..�c\ -ant. o.o��t �-h����, J �,-�- c� S` CAC c \ec�� Off.. S . e�„i5�c►� � s � t �PCI . L . -�Iked l />>;� h «/ L�a,'r�e•n 5`��JVOr'� cf' fh� ar-co.de . oa�c/ � . eh„-)d him /ae am Clef. y' 2VC4C � aha ✓r t-hO "Pe rs. .1'x►rcne�'� _?�} /�c� /�o.ne`._. PJCLGe ✓ l less yeu c�'e .,n >cvc K,•,'`F, l S � wed C!Ty OF RaNC:iO CUCAMONGA _ CO ".1MltN1TY D�VE'.OPMFN7 DIEPT. PM AS 7�Se9�ellet2i1�2�3a4we - E 0 'Video arcades create Z' local- headaches 1 -:bi% is the second of two us rim about shoat the rspidly nortax sides r?IDn market and Ail the mC[Tytraki:rg the tddeo urn rs%croated rudh a tomclh of A century computer magi' bas Tun to generate real headaches r my, gommm ems bare and San" the n2tam. And the Prot am don't want to disappear. New ekctroor. c'd m- operated game are tan. ,pas would agree. and have a riurnate purpose, but the maF and tun begin to get cempjiot- f when the g=am are grouped i amdm What do city goaerroma6a do to "'LLite ltle untt9hal ),t mReS ud7 Popular arcades? hlomrUn•'s caditaanal use per` ut procedure. which u currently nag tested.. epmres an arvde to owdo the special peen I bo- tore-it can he eYahl'shad is a tammormal zone. Toe CU.P. could than be Gad by the Planning Comm4l _tou after a P=mmaai a and could draw a Luxe a=apd of people. lost%. notew and parking ds =ends.- Said Robert park. Moue's director of boriamc and development justifying the the Plarmiag Ciao- IDkslia.. win the e'erOert of the police drySmud apprand a I .- boded with um' , re- strictions; tort su=es an arcede to locate, m the mew Vista Maeeno Plea, at the corner of Monte Vista AVOW and Moraao Street Rene VUdosoli fres1 , , of Super Coma Inc, bes ae eed to keep Lis accede 'toed during school boron — umll A pm oa weekdays —so m ant a hdafele wdh school sessions In ere set`^' Moscow Eme=ry and Serrsm Junior High xboots. Eiowever school ot2dals. pan ads sand neortT resbusmr are out sa•Ustied. and if the cured PeU- tiov dme is fruitful. the issue wilt be broogM to the City Gout uh iadtyht Carolyn Blumell. pemdpol of Moreno Elementary School. and or of the Plm VMA Apartments. both located near the p-sx , - I arcade. objected sbmigty to the a%e and its location within the small shopping terdc at the Ise two FLanag Co MW2S%o meet- ings Kennedy said tl..r arcade al. ready loaned in the Ebtertaia meat Plana. Uhe OCwtme Pena Cor -al. hen beaulcla problems of teenagers loitering an the proper, :9. as well as an increase to See VMM GAME TM"s eo gaFT.iieS /from ?age 1 broken window% bicycle thefts I and other trrdeds of andl mm -tae don't fed a is needed. We do have fire (arcades) within wa&utg dumancm It is bringbg mar teenage mme later this muneci• _•• scar.' :am xametb Ueades the fiat reyorams arcade. the Montclaa Plea houses the Sego Cane. wbkb contains mom than SO video tunes. and the Crand Piz race- way on Ilwouh Asa= also oh fns the game as am ertaxn meet All are a the vfcuaN of thr Siordriser PL A. Iacludiog the new arcade. !u% drawmup a fdJ- Sm and hem gatbrr'aeg SW rehires Iron relf6!rds at the PLva Villa, at Moreno El®e4r r7 School aid at the Pamaas Valley Unnan m, Society. Waded on :lade Vida Avenue Despite the re%trk -ti s oa: tiyn of operahaa placed oa tbe.` new, arcade. Bhmtd said the c'en- dho at should base also blcbdM as age limit ou the Pasco; such m a bar or R4=Wd =cwt If d was 1I5 or acomfanfed by a farad' we wouldat worry : M ell.' said SirmeM atheee *off of Ig signed the original letter of protest deg to the Plaanlog pea Cowan at the &A of can bsr, : tans The letter vets also idgned by the PTA and the Site Coma' Eighteen- year -oY1 Ram Bas mYh,J of Mouttla r lath m agree with Us q fng ms !robe oar t the sacSaea mreeompaated. BUmummumax UM be bad been of- teed drags wwk phow no gate at aeo cicada Vlidoeolzagsaed medoetw a is yam or car age limit. lead this npvamet waS not fart 01 the of ponsibie unconstitutionality. eiplaimad Hal Fredmt[kan, d me pi So. that bm children aceles 17 tips patronizing pinbmll d game amders is the isms Bur, emUy before the Udall Sate Sryreme Coors The ldgb court decided to bear rife Case an a matte' of dhlbrea-Z r4jus. In Oakland. a slmiar ardi. mace declared the artads nff Ilmlb to CbUdm doeY.g school bums and saw 20 PA m school at-liet It eonb tie affected bf the %promme Corot deem Arcade owners in that t7ty Omer to the CISMIRMS nut me ommersencommage mostagcs m bee � a businesses are asbeing ey feel oat One vane said am* a law should aim ben kids from roller rinks and bowling ape" katad of siarJiog out nodes. Some cries. orb m Coral Ga- blem. Flodde6 have outlawed the goitres outighL while others here, I stlS tegsktsoes ere dlscsmsgel the me by W LLthy Srsmd ROCedmd '.. dose in brace, the city of Oataso has tepaatedly, Caned down several arode ralsests doubt the GU.P. peaces.. -ben MRhrbors complained of ferdbte biterft IWL ma od pee rs st In Cot city sad ro anon my bona mare thm tine mschim. In Rancho C•ar'asmhp, VRds Sob: Will open an aerate an Foot. Mir Boulevard nee Archibald Avenue witbam tmrrb EoW Who because that dty don =. equire 4. C.U.P. for the me. Hooever. Use e-A' cou ran is concerned about filar a discesr erg policy erg -:ddg arcades and niqued d a xUff mpoc m the —1 me at the last comma! meetln6- _ .ti: _ "" - _ _ The nationwide debate over rei ukmcn fain ks wren the as, a%mana Involving etudes: do they pm Ate hugs Whining, crime And drug b'affklmig or alomee� ldoc ex � sCtct? A saw hum the Ualver$Lr of IauhrdLe offea rpm results at- Ur observing 2M - witiodgame jhmkles' who they say are addle% - ad to the 75evsbsg®t habit . Profesaas Michael Skkahe and Rkbmd Fee said the addkZm encourage ageresiem without On the pmtjw aide. the gain= "am Impror0 foot resters — and mans Impwtmdy. act as a bed= eekaae.' according to the .stoat stag. Profaor Agbop Der,Karabr tics a social Wldobmt from the Umrershy of L Verse. said the baba forntlag tendency u part of the aaI of the Rama whilb offer 'intermittent re- waroe' gOde like gambling. . The perm is competig Train bimscif and is impress (manse skills) everytime People bate to set ibecmaiv¢ do bete.' es- pignedDaaCanbetiaa - in the rommahm . city pinitaw s in Ranebo Cumu.iam p and Momt- clair are Rembmt Rescues from devebpm to establish the war UVWeramma uses as thew formaed newly newly canters. shopping in Mootclaft's RAM Psm. the Pud Land Corp. is temporanly t hl r a request fram Llama Fiore to SK hip the cry*s LIM arcade until mac tenons Orono Into the eager because Use the could dbcearaile other uses, sad Eladersdom We get a half dorem enCi a week from people who wam-to VA arcades ia." said Froderlek- _ae. _� .....__e. Video arcade business slitting galactic scale '`-'This Is the first of two stories on the -ploy Do ft •Idee INUMIN" Smut" am He impab no V* kcal area. E7 S.EtE SCAVZISA Start Write 7be ray CorP.m Keboc F.tnpftr, JULY a=&.Cd: -our Kscimon as to repot therLPiil4r anar launch a 'Te rnmmurgoe coeatanes m san lse arees,becktpe ter the Passer-by b "Insert the The autenal soaods like stn Wars — a acme that brings m mmd both Hall at and mwney. The popular space theme bunched by the emrnoas box- office smash has Once again joined forces with Hollywood bcekers in a different fowl of eata:Teal auleo games. n,nY.: company lbaf has been toned P,ctnraq those a saw, in toned paubaL' video ges, is bow, er ibe iubabvi Midway Fame market war: its J,7cornp ms i%bw resR and es7mf cforPthe above are URC aken for the above ores sage taken from the .,deo game adM cart. Odnecs. wee D. CotOmb and Co. of t7ucago. Alan fee. at Sumy. vale and S= Enterprise Ine, at Redondo Soc1 are an part of other coulti•bWon dollar ea4s• - ; 'k its• •i' - - — 'A youth tests his aknis on one of this popoi arvl0ao pumas in A local areads. t tab®ed cosso mnames that io- elude nausea llke Patammet W Col®bu Piehnea Iad¢st rtes Tae. Lo¢prt ap rIl alma d D. cdtJkb am Co. m December 1816 he SM WMIM in 1996. ammssaaa game made ap ]p.7 DescerK d Cntamtaab 2da1 rear- use"m peso[ d fn operat- atamme and Weston Iodsebries ire. a $42 blur- dollar coo• [Iomeale. owm Spa F.dapris- C cit any �jr.�. 7,ct1 ea Ix. and other adettammn¢ lyams such as Madison Square Garden Coop. and Panamomt P4hres Cons. Atari Ine too been boupt2 by Warner Comoro- HoUrmill cam wbm bs team th'vags that go bleep and ]mboom oa the ,been and the electronic adsTrmas In the err- ade involves manvalas, twit nology and. of comae, ern ry. Video game -tie have wewa pulp onus she +®aunt recorded See VWMGAKEWPagei 4S! VU /from Page 1 by Vemiral Tlme marRaiae in Itf12. jmapang kom imp asdnaon teat 9e,r to d^..g bill= on 1960. aped the 1Jffi fiRrae should be even hitOree aeemdlag to trade On the kuml level, ale her donors from phetgnwaal sal, encorcage and persuade more and more dries aocp m Mont- Clair. to accept stare mrosual ores. SlontrJarc already hue two amde and recently approved a peraat for a shad. brand entertainment and the dlatclair Pram m ]871. The O•came Pisa Corral, attieh combpuak la>?a. beer and garner; Ind been in the Morsclair ender takmaera Center airge Jo1y and IS the latent video ,arse use lord to ter. husrmeaserch dtY- The doted n ovsnnd by Super Game ]x. a smnikt cmpondon. tsrt will locate N the vista 1Nmw Dloreruo Plm. Aunoagta rrporta teat thee err � +sia�pot ��fg� cannaunity3 ddldteu, secordhg Woe to increase as grass ybs denaic t�hst's awee� t� tuf. oansed4 called the Idootel,v Amruc.•rinrt C0. fakes in a Combined Rion mks receipt :mm Pin am Elf 7m.960 a weep. accemssr, sb Bdl Aston. vice Dseldunf d the Jtart- tlair Cmmbrr d Corrmrrce. That's 78D,m0 a rranth.Sag0.890 is biz vaonna atW if they top RotaR at thus rate, almost A atiWart a yewr. Sella Center. operating SI R+nxs and an [ond avneemon. toot M appiosim,tely A80,60G is n core avvk u toe arga eomps- aY revea4 its complicated trans tannrahorra. The Polly Hergm clnnrged Its name is 17.'4 w vqs acquired by eau and W . CM At that time. "Segalapan: a coin-operated amusement game firm In Japan since 1956, became pact of Sena Emrtpsse- Sfntt I81v, the ^ompary pas opaad IB tirades is Cautornta. one mdar "ere trstamant name -Pl. Pfaalr" in Wet Cava. and kept several picots and ma• tlunes in Japan. Segal revesues in the la" five eve Yvan mere a.••• --• five ax up e Prealmrtdy AO ntiuin� to Sind milllm in 1961 t[fsed years nor prom July 1 to June JDs. .. 7Jmcathed by a tecmion, this video game business cmtinues to grow an all levels: pcoducUOn, dtsnbupao and eperahon, "7bere to always someone ddaR well In spite of Qenaoaue eandrtloua.- can g7ark SaltsperR, dhtetpn of operation of Serpu a envision of Seger Eate art r The � in the amroanam � same industry barn Pltmn to rnmp'.cc vfdm Roma can be traced to teehnoltRY. particularly advascensents; in temputers used � the renoaarWatoe ew0 otter the i imenbou of "POW" by ?:o;ar. 1 mErtaDkru, founder of Matti. back i As seat as three is a comput- e' evolution tlkse will always be , • fiarae evolupm." said S.:its- baY. Sinn that prune, the games use . r C h hm can, 1611, and Chuck Haggard toy bear and vkdeo games make for a gold dpmbrnallon. They spare a good part of a UqM -yeses ahead Of ft aNrirnl annotated table tvanrs desusL Ames vUh sever b .ibaft The most often ptryed ma. pryets and ?elate are dwisa, said Sehcd chines team advaeaed cempoF -kw- ha been replaced by cr- crapble tMunoloay, with 'lap! ^sad medtosdat apelaa sophisticated WOW comroWd by and k era by rmianotvnpntar the pam backed up mth robe- fd staedos and futunsbc sand chips and eaadoctmrL Former members of AMOA wbo said effects, to draw thr curious jdebosa are mwksd over for • Win- YOU .calk by a machlme the newcOMOM sum as Atak and and it says'Comr Play ble.' You better believe WU eta some at. ha clam 66 per. .16 a hill tenban." jokes Jatm Schoss, d cent In ears last yaw. wpb 700 the CAiatoansed lode W=n4 mew emp jontir4 after the ation for vhden serene rrDeraters and producers, tzUed Ammnnn¢ November canoreioa mvdbvg the rants to 1700 mbaswiea. and Music Operator AaooaUosr, Most of then are video gams At a scent Chicago aysve¢ Uen, producers unveiled mew The effects of the computer Fames such as Super tank and Three Pool. and a twcdmhens o Same evolution esm be sum net ody in acades. but to anvs a: comPmertfed pinball maclune called the Raanted Name. The adverse amts. reftimamts. ban, airport sad edher t acts sales d use more shank pennon tint. * ngon at tee 04MM Pizza Tonal drinking beer vehlta Playing Fimbird In Its cocktail-table font. In Atlmt, do somds of spore ar coal' cotes rLalat each other in a nd vam em now, be hoed m Its thee —W room in hoopits! fasteenity Wards. Said Sates. Childrvs one :eaea adddy ba ooae the decks have cam peas found in aehooly. patients of do- ton and dadMt can try their dean becauw de aueldoea are row in same wits t Dooms, said OM t �� tro4 who ds arc the ddt ate At MontdWs OCome Play Canal. Rm Rsomeae, I& use more Om how ehaae to Iced We favorite tmm. Ddender. and boost his "& fie said he spends SZ5 a wz.k, an tbcsvemgQ "I Ma tc -noo.aR.- said Ran. wllh a soft oat St boost a top score m Defender - 200.060 't Padres -M— jet stand these un emaaement,, said the mwtcbw � McRaudds. 10. d Dp• head. airs Abe tries to put a ailim m her video tame bodR at at $lat a weak. red auidely added tbat older also ha earn Plop In much more. It's a chaBOW to beat a F O R R It also m not my IrmusUahA." said VxReynyds. B=, PkoWzh tayserte vidro Fua can ape mesa good bal. am and large semis of ash for Ibe praP Ietwa Iodine cites the their k bee. eeeremrs Lr Montclair delays acfo ®n . on new video -game center 8y I;M E SGILZIII.O Staff Writer Afraid that the fl slairug lights and the sounds of eleciroric beeps and buzzers coming from a proposed video arcade would of- fer more than "dean entertain- ment-" the Montclair Planning Commission decided to postone Lasing any action until Dec. 14. At that time more information will be available. The ccaumssion heard argue. merits Moday night both for and against the establishment of an electronic game ceder in the Vista Moreno Plaza, 4917 Moreno St- Montclair, on the corner of Monte Vista Avenue and Moreno Street _ of the city According staff, the use r combined with its location was unacceptable because of its dose prodmit I to Moreno Elementary School and Serrano Junior high ScbooL Some problems outlined by Fredericsen are associated with an arcade located only 600 feet west of an elementary school and 2 blocks away from the junior NO school Eapeded problems are: school truancy . excessive potential drug use and �� potential mimea� of A apoke�an for Morino Elf medary School asked the com- mitsiaa to consider the question: " What value is this kind of business for the culdrea of our Fredericksen asked the commission: "gall we tale the chance of having an this arcade close to t sstwols ? George WMmm Serrano Junior sigh Sc � tatted before Monday night's meeting, said he would not be in agreement wft at its proposed location. arcade "I wouldn't want my Lida stop- ping in there before or after school td Lice then to come straight to school and when they are released (at 2 p.m.), I want tbm to go stralgh� Piaiped the home," es prulapai l� Willmore said he could only guess about possible problems caused by the arcade, one being concerned parents who would call up the sehoot looking for their child who did not come right btme. Lou Catalano, representing Bruce Muiheam who owns the Vista Morew center, said be would like to lease the remaining three stores which are now en;r ty- Fredericksem told the commis- sion that allbough the recommce- dation wou5 be to deny issuance of the necessary conditional use permit the staff has mixed emo. boas an the use because the applicant Super Games Ian., is very q . Rene Vuildosolz, prrs9dent of Super Games Inc., told the com- mission be plans to buy 5100AOD worth of new video machines to put in the center. These include the popular: Pac-Man. Asteroids and Space Invaders with some new, not yet - marketed games called Super Tank and Three - POOL The city of Montclair currently bas two such arcades, one in �tyhe Mo&.claL- Pt and ome at.the Entertakiment Plaza which tmm- bines a restaurant we with•tbe games area. - Items c concern involved the zrcade's hours of operation, which are proposed to be from now t from 10 a m i weekdays to 10 pm on wee> ads sad holidays Commissioner Roberta rc bee requested that if the arcade was not open during school hours, the truancy problems could be Also. the exclmd of children under age 15 who are not accom- panied by as adult was another condition discussed among the applicard and the planning staff However, the staff was car cered that the applicant would not be able to live up to these regulations, which also include a membership card system to screen "mWesirable patinas. ~. Besides the enforcement prob. lems with such arrangements, Eugene Demct„. city attorney said the U.S. Supreme Coat has not derided if mcluding children under a fwtain age from such entertahnaent is legal - " be jury is still out on that issue,^ said Demchck, referring to tic case currently before the high court which also comes from a video game use. '•I would be centered abaft the city. lm- posing those conditions,- added Demchmk Vhldosolz owns and opeatWt other arcades in Southern Cardi- far ma and his Rainbow Arcade is Pico Rivera is the best run of its lord, according to as dEicil from that city who was ques- tioned by the plazini staff. He said his success centers on treating his customers well, exec cially those kids who come is for the first time. They usnaDy'get a free game or two and a lot of attention. "IGds am looking for love," said VEdasolz. °- E U .0 t j Site g wdeUnes sought Pte --sri ah �aeao BY RICHARD PERAZIL ,:.:'; prefemce.' accordbag•'to'aesismat < Im� � ovear InO dlog caahs and•I Staff writer ;::. ;::' pl fury MltdwIL' ` , : gatLets along the strleeta and the paw pig• C.onzabsioners . He wjA they asked staff members'-:- r,owner feels she cost of tome is: still aren't sure what Lind of to- ptepatr a sd of guidelines for, .-. ptoldbitive. location is ideal for .pinball and' ; ::.selectim of sixa Mitchell. said CSa -Am' Imports electronic fame arcades. •, -. _. �;., L-t othc business.. planners •; agreed• to set up a completion'I Arcades have been a sore cap# iu,::. approved a conditlenai use permit ;; 'schedule _ for.. the., off-site, the city for . months. -Several an' existing auto- . improvements conditional case permit requests', ; dismantling yard to couth:^c •°1'heyreasywanttocomply;w h, winch world allow theta in shopping .0Pesatteas at the northeast eornarof ' . the new standards;" Mitchell said.•; centem have been tinned dower in , California Street and C ocamanga? .: MitchelI, said planners aug, recent months 'because of.'.:Avenne mitcheusald. approved an order adowing+: compiaims from nearby m_Adeatz. "' :' Current. city 'codes'requiri mobile. bomes,to.'belocated; =in;'; that they would attract kdterhrg ,`: updsthrg of tte facility and owners residential• areas f cast cite::; ten4gers and vandalism...: - : , ?: •Lave of£eredtgbaild a W&waIl m Comr=sioaers discussed the" screen the yara-and its m-, from' ;::.The ordJmuxx also ssdsmfdsmm possibility Tuesday of ,7tmlt�g r re6ldent:al Lhds enc oadaiag from' :: :, regdreae►6 whim mobile Eomes arcades to only cettaift types of, the east and south.... ... mmRmedoefotebelogallowedloW cummerctal districts bC c••,u' But •the. ,eity also wants residecif neighgrhoods,eftherai. come up * with no definite `,.4nds.eaping' I.aad off -site. ,* shtgle develd txi2i er is tai woo raw generally not ganeaUr not Item amaMaee AS etnan,kmMt or amam,em,.nd tnerefonaenet mraeabr mPntdtr � m¢a. i and SMIamnotsamulYmwrae spedd ce. tammm[ and aaluremegA and tart rrmole speeW pe' mlaadibn,rfeafwbtMtteua NNo,emOa S. Pasadena zap � TbO nno,t aha thht arc now abLob I U=fo oeic w ebe btIn Swam. x -0 th Iwo*@ that Mato —x -0 eM Ilai may tX m am ICIIZ:C my b=na n,M re MObmM*tuateoMtatto CmMtlaal meyemAM and +��ytr�•�+. t/e+��/� q /���■ya��■ A Games ry{Icta�l.lglr�io It�e So th Pand out MAI Take Su3n ml MMLhtg d Ncet L� V V{.��AYY.V wbrcfi a m uc Mom re natrfetll M m tuna( h L- k-:•Zr 9/Z7/47 GWI acmat the su .. Gatmd -outs ant tMamptanau the tawea euna:e Br ssAl r SABBF7Cyftna,, War f, wn 5s<,w only rsa rrbr athe nnlr Place m to.h.un Strew lottcAame.rlo M It toot va,onry¢ypw;wv theleeannkthorn, rcn ant a tepwtm far atuamnA rowdy hpa -and SoMh The restatram t midaay balsam the City', only Paatetm City offkata stopped o G114"mwau,=Cut j fiWz MCI ON aW Motor both.* M Nat tan blab agay, . alt nt+Wtx+comMAtntatne f and in a new N San Marton there. an roc cream parlor -here 1 ]labour Watpe��plmwg�memmanMne. Iwtpur,a YmnCNmVlecbtterrptndfarrWSOAmR1Lee nv 1 Pctmntl,eorru. m.enmr. :+a, cued fcr PrabaLwc 1 Sat Waanet•7t', a hagmd, an attraaWe nw,,m, Acme (rodm deflmtor an soda as my boadwa thw. ' That, Place tabs the bd.' lunch mmwy -they pm it m A ^ .•mat Chao LtaeeA,Rltt raacbam.aad Ian a tbeW Ylamactm It become, a drug. Alcadw IN stadyng — tow to content the Aamea. am M] Covnu, 0 Monte and Sal Cabe ralsladproblem:tnerett YatdammMand NWT- And' I they(Stnow Hat Is ) .Thmpro- pond .ad" A"eca fall fw a YarktY of t licamt, but Are not payout ttowtwt n-` . rate ao,erereaequN re 100nt'a CrnH ladngg at each other far - 1Ntn6i,1 �n.nd(rn .And nohege'M tai end. SadSMtNPasadma Polar =hWfrAm Bwnyu, 1 RRTW h3LCIVhaslt: at The RR TWA ten t^'m'onc at tM scone a ro `Ws Martel an avenue than a p= parbr. Wltm rain ngM has noel b act a preettenl` Judd Ibrmra -Jud o have X menthe d hods emgraAitlg. thatch a eeadr- ILrd.r. anar+wl W IlU ranch clknttle fw tnrg ZOlea We know tda ate Mug be lo*KMrmAmdga how R Gantry are. ttx b Pas,ocna for tukance. ,Wdbawthere. hha bgp Who the ter9rtR atom TM not going b net Moo the free too Prob:erwrg trnagC wthaut tgaer. I .r-erre for TMgeaeeApeI, caar:s. TM icah[ye wMtmyw have for bdabdAnd / t, appioatiOna for (glade Lt colt too M.mY rcourt the con, tan 1w them. a0 trots hang aepnmd ad rauae Of Zh n known count of tlx rturrntne d 6+mt, m pnrate tarot. I priv. trout W' . b m • the amgardStraw lib Pont, all N atbbinory. .. • :t�torn tr. :.r.at .n rc.rtxnng rho Ramrs a pus- Stowe he tool over mare than a you ago. Larry put. -no ruee,re 'IWM a Latorea M tbellat rtwesald.NCprcOparkrratrltas thaganeataenea, kunce+torYlvn.w Who Waye Pnvjal drodesaIn m wtaadef Imd Students naveabort touch hoo, Cr.:tn my thee. u a ,udder tnrgea,a M •deo amla and AD lorgar mnRmMte and the palm probjewd4 -. PlareYt t= ha, created new Problems tur pane. Tbey �:a ear mxmtw,aitracuvemu apDOtad'alM hemdutedmrleipal, The + axrsdvttamernran- m,ehnoeaae for tMmbrtanmema oar,egu -. =4 They my youngaae, Pie Thew yYddletMY- aefariMradea'� lAdth tuncn nnmaY ZapPmRali Y�bety mG .•trctrontedottereate mueagYldtnunbneghbora AM tha gma, WAS the t'ematram about ISMID a Pro- AcmefoRl, saYaraaccaM 1pntEAte neallyM- I ataalLPbneaar,ad, hitM the rw to ad TDa PI�gK COMMadan. dlallCd br d a t,tcan ;+our pegmrtM nun on add [hMroma d ddlan b th wuna at dwim sardatrad ®elawnee, ha,aeledfo�j haaml ,, rnewdTlnMtolera a hunit of a hmK d nee Maclmte b a bemntna It eeooMSmm�deL Pro!ln from eati� gable ala•trlongnons (w titoae pant tba.dw panmrc fn be %3W a VmartQ -whleh trMW '•r...er- really VLxao. accorw g b sew-rg CRY report, IndrvMOa: games uwuDr enn a Counter b Ptvc crime tneab a Nmp in haun a for the cay tram about 793 b; n2waanmay. . raara4+nt m tokcut w uatem and gamM;ZiG last 7'Ma y CM CW bnpa,od a 60-day Mo:atorfnan m apt The moat PePY1a' gaMa in aaanr, mflgrg Mb Ne CRY whole A CIA, the aua.1 (fade, dtel bttaen- aAPdM/gPeak boors; on - out. ' 1 md,anderegmga Whatever South Pasadena dom It wan ;A h W ; ..tanvbmtme wdudaMStnwtot Pnateonbsa wnh Germ Wt xMply std aeertte the i tomewadkanararoacttretatoYttstraw Ha Pt,. a. Neel( goats, taonoaa reWrt an mereaug (amber of mtWl.otMrrs esnLt- y,pMOpdplamra.(,C,tnr(latyL,aO. 7rtloll.9rfa.rl.. The an�yrt,h woe to atade chances. Mare Tbentayarof San Kamm wham Uncrearettoamwe .j Plaaa,raeflltl[P1. PaarL Met and ®earMMmem boa a. mod the city, current. fMC -Mebh MonYa'n® aI 1plMe MaMMes Is Ia n-� bpreblemarlow- wdont -amj a ehatlm M wnkb a varaa bWldYlg m uwd,olety tw. �'>�.'1Jbnlimbater bad. a Namtein eeraeYCntcrimpnDoocC&D It Ydea Aanas m lesavy aabmeciai Ciro Indu,trlaawaa,I baOdttsepeerbda thentU9MS ' GMwoo 7altugn, tSalCabnel6angtcdgameaodeaatiaYiegf dawn these that wee apeeabng and a twrtn aMm ' a tpocawtmawnila the . pneldmaaew NPasadm tbaroanmPo Waeeade- cakbad, other than Impaut them M mmmaml ZOOM std as currant IAmPo ldS b Comater the r% Lrtanee tw a'e a zoo6m sxtlS a Year Pr Cas•..e nr a armlar am basid An am ooaa799.88 ,wdM the hwtue far an anatte Ww Ud�tad .`Dm'tquNeew.bahbhebkaeMrte. tbbmp wKb Buie .1' 'r 7 A 1-1 t P Lf " *,-) t, F . I � . I t I Continued from Rest Page ' game distributors and dealers —and children. Botelho, who is studying in Vancouver, Wash., agreed with some of the video game critics. Yeah." he acknowledged, •they're a wasteof time." He knew about video games before coming to the United States: they've already invaded Brasilia, he said. Botelho was in Disnevland•s S-.arcade —one of South- ern California's largest video game arcades — mostly be- cause his young host, Mike Gatretson, 19, of V anceuver• wanted to be there. Personally. Botelho admitted, he'd rather be out see- ing the rest of the park Gar -etson admits to spending too much .time and money on the games for one reason_ "I ilke them." But he doesn't spend his lunch money on them, be said with the same good humor: "1 spend that on junk - food!" Video game dealers and ditnbnan, sensing that the corrsoversy over their product may stmt affecting profits. protest, that the games may begetting a bum rap-. . _ If kids are getting out of hand• they suggest, Lhats. most likely a problem of society as a whole- Video ames, they ingest, arc harmless emertairunent. to fact• they may help keep some kids from roaming the streets. A. cage Merits Debatedl s Ira Bettc!man was rot pleased. As vice president o: C. A. Robinson and Co" which he believes s Southern California's largest distributor of video games and other corn- operated devices. Bettel- man had spent the morrang at a meeting of the Los An- geles City Council. He'd gone because of an ordinance up for adoption — one that would impose new rest•- ictions on the installa- tion of game machines. The measure would require public hearings and conditional use permits before five or more machines could be instal;ed in a location It w•asn' even the res:rtctions that had Bettelmon up- set. however. :i'hrle he might not care for-them, he could live with Lhe- Lumped Kith Other.. rw But they had lu::ped the game arcades into an ordi- nance along with massage parlors. bathhouses• dance halls and sexual - encounter establishments. Bettelman worn its about the public image of game a. - cades —and he didn't care for the implied connection. It turned out Bette] man got his way —at least legally. The council adopted two ordinances. one for arcades. the other for the other establishments. B::t Beucitnan wasn't entirely pleased. "When the story tames out in the papers, wc'11 aii be lumped together again:. hesaid. � r ;. Bettelman had been to Fountain Valley not long be -, fore to help fight an ordinance that would have kept vi -i deo games out of liquor stores. T he measure was defeat ed. He has watched cities throughout Los Angeles and adjoining counties adopt restrictive measures. Most, like Los Angcics. cL -;sifv fire or more machines as arcades and require bearings and conditional use permits The public seldom hears the good side of•the game business, he said with obvious f."ustration. His ow•n firm. he said. has made machines available for many community benefits. And. he added. "I don't know any arcade owner who doesiet support a Little Lague team. or help some other way." He admits, -We•rr not heroes." It's all pert of good business. but it does show, Bettelman suggested, that the game machine people are involved in their coirmu- nities and concerned about youngsters.. Anaheim was among those cities that decided this summer was the time to tighten restrictions on game machine installations: license applicztions beryl% comia>s in "fast and furi- ous." according to Councilwoman Miriam Kaywood• or.; citizens were beginning to squirm "It n%ay be it rational." she said. "but people am fear- ful of groups of younP, People" And young people do tend to gather where there are games. she said. She has received letters complaining of noise after midnight. al- cohol and drug use. and beer bottles strewn on front lawns near arcader. Concerned citizens began showi -3g up at council meetings; busizesses near some of the installations ProtrYed that they we a losing customer;. - tWore taking action. the Anaheim City Council or- dered a study of mviilar -sized cities. A inka Saotaiahti. the city's assistant Planning dimtor.. reported that ns among 10 Orange and I Angeles County cities sur- veyed. Anaheim was just about the most lenient" Most cities. she said• required conditional use permits for five or more michines; some had declared moratcri- ums. temporarily prohibiting new installations The Anaheim council opted for a different. ploy: They -Iecided to requi e a survey of all residems and b•.ssi- nu-iies within a 300 -foot radius of any proposed arcade. def mta as five or more mal hues. If less :h= half the respondents oppose the installa- tion, the arcade could be licensed after a rovdae police check. just as before: if half or more respondents are against an instatation the license will be denied —al- though the applieaiKmay appeal to the council. It was one of those times. when tae Anaheim City Council voted uinanimwab:v. Mayor John Seymour. who often disag ees with Kaywood gave his app, vaL Although he enjoys a gams of Asteroids himself said the mayor. and although he it concerned about adding rew governmental regulation•. the situation in Am- ahpmseemedtodemandact ii Zrrespom:billty, Games . Bettelman doesn't think game mac'ines'should be blamed when kids act irresponsibly. Take those children who spend their lunch money Playing Pac Man or Asteroids: • 1 find it did icult to believe that the child saved his money and ate lunch rive times a week before there were machines," he said One woman he recalled complained about n young •boy out at 11 p.m., riding his skateboard toward a game ar•-,rde. Where would that youngster have been beading if khere were no arcade around. Bettelman wondered. kV he Proposed kid to be. an arcade isn't such a bad place for a kid to . _ - . . WcUimemaged installations to the tight lecations ate nice plus for the city. i:aywood said. The biggest Prob- r nit, she said, has been with poorly managed operntio is rn s rtall,neighborhoodshoppingcentem 4 It's nosh; .g new for communities to reset to electron _ is g ;a:� appeal through legislation, said Joel Gilgofi: who rims a Van IJutys -based first Called C 6 * * F C wl.h his wife. Shclle. - He's serest pictures from the 19303, ;hosting hem York Mayor Fiorello La Gaa. -dna breaking up Coni stated pin_ (ball Iaaehines with a sledgehammer. I But,Gflgoff believes strict laws maybe the wrong so- Plemse see VIDEO Gi)1FS, page 1T Ll u L.i r 1 LJ r r ' d S?oe�lnseaes �imela .. . • , : -. _. .... ' VIDEOEO G A11 TS G B= mostly he sells to non - celebrated Southern G1i- C4ntlsaed from iCth Page formans who like to play the games, feel stattat in ocvh- _. ing a machine, sad e*Y the pizazz a machine adds to r When society has problem people look =mind for a their Some deca r . ' scapegoat. he said—and iYs easy to pick anamachi While arcade lure the youmgaters +,� spend their There's nothing evil about the games, be 'argued: quarters. Gilgoff entieeo their elders to browse in his r Theyre certainly notas violent asTV bowroom with their checkbooks and credit cards. ' 7aMe Gilgoft like B ttelman selle game timcbmes His firm, located on an unimposing comatercial strip fo: cominercial tae, he's had his best success selling o f Valjean Avr=m is a rrody store for game lovers. them forusein the home. Along one wall the newmt video games gleam sedue- During the last seven years. Gu7goff said. he has sold tively next to a selectianof pinball machines. more than 5.000 machines— huluding pinball game. Across the carpeted aide there's arow of andgm slot slot machines sad others, along with video game— machines. with cards proudly announcing their pedi- I=Tdy!o: home use glees, such as a trendy - looking 19Cf9 model from the Currently. be added. sale of some games it re tapering Golden iqugpm it's listed atSZ.985. off because of economic coaditiorm 'there are also old jukebme. the kind with glowing. But not m with video games --and that's at an aver- ebangtog Colors Gilgof f will sell a 1940 Wurlitzer. eom- age $2.500 to 33A00 for a co c=oral- gmiitY Pre 3bn plete with peacock whose tailfeathers change hues for or Super Cobra tograceyourhvingroom. $7.495. Those willing to pay the price include Johr Davidson. Video game sales didn't start taking off until 1978. he Charles Bronson. Cindy Williams and George Kennedy. said, when Space Invaders rapped onto the some sua ft Aurnt w, ign t Part Iv 17 The early games wore out their welcome rattler unit for $140. book K up to your TV set, then bury as quickly — usually in a couple of months Gilsoff said. many cassettes =you want for aSaat=each Children tired of a game as soon as they figured out how to beat it The shop owner believes all this activity ltadi to one cone: aion: The reason video games are doing so well is But today's games are a different breed, he said ' becamsethey'refum "They're mote sophisticated, more challenging.- Tb&e partly why be Bads it so frustrating when One of the newest games. Super Cobra. eren lets the . communities erlucize games player start a new game at the level of difficulty he had All they offer, he =4 is "latlq comical cartoon char - reached in the last one —so it becomes ever more corn- asters It really takes a vivid imagination to see how ; Pl .h And there a7c otter developments: The temptation. he riaintaim Is -to blame the game ; —A British manufacturer is now offering a scaled- rather than society" down version of the commercial gams -about the sine At Dmeylan4 Jodi Petersen. 24. of Hauungton Ha- of a cabinet -model TV set, hour who was honing Brazils Botdbo and Vanmuvees — Another manufacturer is offering a full-sized Garretson for their. Southern California visit, just - programmable' machine: When you get tired of one shrugged his &boofdcsoverthe whole lsuse _ t game. you can bu� wssette .change the nameplate and A waste of money? -1 admitit,"heaaid.. begirt playing gam But it's fun. he said. and you have to play a lot to i} —For those who can't afford the commercial cwdel get good ... and getting good is the only way to get but want a choice of games. Gflgoff has organized an more for yourmaney. ' Atari Club. And as far as he was concerned. that's what anises The idea. he aplaine4 is that you Lary the Atari home sense about video game. t 9 0 4d? Cris OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 13, 1982 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jack Lam, A.CP, Director of Community Development B`!: Michael Vairir„ Senior Planner SUBJECT: TERRA VISTA HEARING AND TOPIC SCHEDULE On November 19, 1981, an introductory presentation of the Terra Vista Plan was made by the Lewis Company to the Planning Commission and mem- bers of the public. In addition, copies of the draft Planned Community Text were distributed. Following the initial presentation, the Plan- ning Com=ission hel,i a special meeting on December 17, 1981, to discuss preliminary concerns ;r suggestions on the plan. At that time, the Draft Environmental Impact Report was completed and distributed to the Commission and other interested parties. The Commission then instructed Staff to prepare a report which would outline a review process and a schedule of hearing dates. Attached is a general outline of the major topical issues. We plan to use a similar approach that was used in review of the Victoria Planned Community. At each of the public hearing meetings, Staff will present a series of issues and concerns for the Coasnission to discuss and, if possible, arrive at a consensus. Staff is preparing a detailed work program that will coincide with the proposed meeting dates and will make that available to the Planning Commission. We are also preparing a standard report format for these public hearings that can also be used to record the consensus of the Commission on each of the issues. We are recoumending that the meetings occur on a once a month basis on the first Monday of every month. If some issues are not completed at this meeting, then we may have the opportunity to conclude that topic at a regular Commission meeting later that month. The Lion's Community Center is available on this evening which would allow meeting at a con- sistent location. We would further suggest that the Commission consider limiting the time of these meetings from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. ITEM 14 Terra Vista hearing & Topic Schedule Piannirg ComYission Agenda January 13, 1932 Page 2 We recommend that the first public hearing be held on Monday, February 1, 1982- The topic would be Land Use beginning with the residential section and working through as time permits. It is difficult to perceive how much discussion or how much time will be needed on each of these issues. We will prepare a de- tailed work program allocating amounts of time for each of the topics to help provide a guideline. This will be available at the first pu31i;; hearing. As was in the case of Victoria, some issues may not be totally resolved at one meeting, and may have to be carried over to subsequent meetings. We will plan for this in our work program in order to keep on track and progress through the process. We anticipate that we would have the Staff Reports for the monthly meetings completed the Wednesday prior to the meeting. These mee *.ir., .;: wil7 be advertised public hearings that could begin on February 1, 1982 and ba continued to each first Monday of the month until the plan has been totally re-iewed by the Planning Commission. The Environmental Impact Report will be re,iewed for adequacy towards the end of the process. In addition, there may be additional issues and topics which the Staff has not listed, but are of concern to either the Commission or the public. These can be added to the appropriate categories when these issues are raised. Respectfully submitted,, JACK LAM, AICP Director of Community Development JL. t1U: j r Attachment: Topical Outline 1, 07 TOPICAL Ob'TLINE The f�alowiag is a general outline of some topics to be discussed in review of the Planned Community Text. There may be other issues which are not listed under each of the categories and new issues can be added as they are raised. I. LAND USE A. Residential 1. Is the Plan consistent with the General Plan? 2. is the total number of dwelling units proposed appropriate for this area? 3. Are higher densities locate' in the right places? 4. Do the transition of densities provide for appropriate buffering? S. Do the residential design considerations clearly define phasing, village clusters, and design thanes? 6. Are the incentives or bonuses listed for affordable housing con - sistent with the General Plan? 7_ Review of statistical summary. B. Commercial /Mixed Uses 1_ Is the location and size of neighborhood centers appropriate to adequately serve Terra Vista? 2. Are the uses permitted within the neighborhood centers appropriate? 3. Are the types of uses permitted within all commercial areas clearly defined and balanced? 4. Is the amount of office usage in balance with other commercial uses? S. Are the mixed use pods clearly and adequately defined and addressed? 6. Are the conceptual designs in accordance with the City design objectives? 7_ Does the text ensure that the various commercial categories and sods will be designed and used as envisioned or will it become a hodgepodge of commercial uses? 8. Should commercial pods be specifically listed and limited to specific uses? 9. Is the conceptual design and use of the community center satis- factory in regards to the goals and objectives of the General Plan? s; Topical Outline Page 2 C. Community Facilities 1. Is the hospital locates in the best location given the existing and proposed land uses? 2. Are the community use areas adequately defined and located to take advantage of other community facilities? 3. Are st-hooi locations realistic and do they relate well wits the residential area znd other commercial uses? 4. What is the plan for +.he provision of schools and financing? 5. Are the appropriate nimber of parks provided and are they logically located in reiationsh p to other facilities? 6. What provisions are mide for the :maintenance of the puolic open space and parkways? iI. CIRCULATION A. Review of Existing and Mater Planned Routes S. Review of the Parkway C. Transit Systems D. Roadway Types and Guidelines E. Pedestrian Routes F. Phasing of Improvements III. DRAINAGE, FLOOD CONTROL, AND OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE A. Master Storm Drain System B. Storm Water Retention Basin; C. Maintenance, Operational, aid Cost Concerns D. Sewage E. Water F. Electricity G. Gas I 1C Ll Topical Outline Page 3 N. DESIGN GUIDELINES A. Landscape Standards B. Foothill Boulevard 1. Town Center 2. Community Commercial Center 3. Home Center 4. Corporate Park 5. Finarcial /Restuarant Plaza 5. Executive Park 7. Auto Plaza 8. Medical Park C. Gateways D. Energy Conservation V. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. General Development Standards 8. ReA dential Development Standards C. Community Facilities D. Office and Commercial Development Standards E. Off Street Parking Regulations VI. IMPLEMENTATION OF PLAN A. Phasing B. Fiexibility in Density and Land Use C. Development Review Process VII. REVIEW OF THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT IJ 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: January 13, 1982 ;0: Planning Commission F?OM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Five -year Capital Improvement Program Attacned, for Commission review, is the proposed Five -year capital Improvement Programs for streets and drainage pr.:jects. The proposed program differs from previous programs; in that, the four categories of projects, major projects, arterial resurfacing and reconstruction, traffic signals, and special projects, have meraed into one program priority. The previous project lists are attached for your reference. The current program is an attempt to prioritize project sufficient to utilize available funds for a five -year period. The list is therefore, not a comprehen- sive needs inventory, like the segregated priority lists. This approach allows a full identification of our near term budgetary goals, and will provide staff with direction on expenditure of available funds, as they occur. The proposed program was reviewed by members of the Advisory Commission and conforms to direction of those members. The major modification to the staff proposal was the movement of the Foothill and Hellnar: intersection improvements, from sixth priority to second, and the Archibald and Sixth Street'signals, from thirteenth priority to twenty- first. It should be pointed out, that although Foothill and Hellman has been given the higher priority, as recommended; to stress importance the logistics of design and coordination with CALTRANS would likely force completion of the protect to the sixth position. Staff has included, within the Commission recommendation, an annual review of the program. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission, approve the attached resolution recommending adootion of the Five -year Capital Improvement Program. Respectfully sutnnitted, LBH:ps Attachments ITEM 0 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION4 OF THE P.ANCHO VICAMONGA PLANNING CO"atISSION RECOMMENDING APPRPVAL OF FIVE -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM AND FINDING OF CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL LAW. WHEREAS, on the 73th day of January, 1422, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the attached proposed Capital Improvements Program„ and WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission concurs in the recommended program as proposed, and General Plan WHEREAS, the proposed program conforms to the elements of the NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the P.ancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby: SECTION I: Find that the attached Capital Improvement Program is in conformance with the General Plar. of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 2: P.econmends approval of the attached proposed Capital Improvments Program to the City Ccuncil of Rancho Cucamonga for its adoption.. SECTION 3- Further recommends that said program be reviewed and updated on a annual basis as a part of the City budgetary process. APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THIS day of 1532. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ATTEST: Jefferey King, Chairman Secretary of the Planric,q Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the 'Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolutior. was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of January, 1982, by the following vote, to wi t: AYES: NOES: MENT: o^ COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: 0 PROPOSEn FIVE YEAR STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Priority Project Description 1 Car -ieiian Street - Highland Avenue to 'Ailson St. reconstruction and resurface existing pavement 2 Foothill Boulevard and Hellman. Avenue - widening, drainage and signal installation 3 Hillside Road - Amethyst to Sapphire, re- construction and resurfacinc of existing pavement at various locations 4 Beryl Avenue - Manzanita to Hillside, re- construction 5 6 07 8 9 .0 11 12 13 14 i5 i6 *17 Base Line Road - Cucamonga Creek to West City Limit, widening and reconstruction Archibald Avenue - Fourth Street to Base Line Road resurfacing Archibald Avenue and Fourth Street - signal installation Carnelian Street and Lemon Avenue - signal installation Victoria Avenue - Pecan to Etiwanda, resurfacing Lemon Avenue - Hermosa to Cartilla, resurfacing Base Line Road - I -15 to Etiwanda Avenue, widening, reconstructior and drainage Grove Avenue - Eighth to Foothill, widening and signal modification 19th Street @ Beryl, Hellman, Amethyst, traffic signal installation Archibald and 19th Street - signal installatior. Church Street - Archibald to Hellman, reconstruction and resurfacing East Avenue - Highland Avenue to Summit, resurfacing Etiwanda Avenue - Foothill to 23rd Street, resurfacing Estimate $180,000 $350.000 5120,000 S 60,000 $ 80,000 $400.000 S 40,000 £ 70,000 $ 30,000 $ 35,000 5100,000 $75n,OnO $200,000 $ 35,000 S 35,000. S 50,000 Priority Project Description Estimat 18 Haven Avenue - Highland to Nilson, resurfacing $100.0 19 Base Line Road and Beryl Street, traffic signal $ 80,000 installation 20 Vineyard R Ninth Street, traffic signal S 80,000 21 Archibald and Sixth Street - signal installtion S 80.000 22 Turner and Foothill - widening. drainage and signals $350,000 23 Hellman Avenue @ SPRR, drainage and widening $350.000 24 19th Street @ Beryl, Hellman, Amethyst, traffic $200,000 signal installation TOTAL $3,790,000 11 :o a° `�4 STAFF RECOMMENDED STORM DRAIN PRIORITIES CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PRIORITY PROJECT NAME CSDP # LIMITS EST. COST 1. Beryl- Hellmar. Drain 2 -F, 2-M (por- S.P.R.R. @ Heilman $1,175,000 tion) to N/0 19th @ Beryl 2. Hermosa- Turner Drain 4- A,B,C,Q Alta Loma Basin to $5,500,000 Deer Creek plus lateral 3. Cucamonga Storm Drain 2 -J, 2 -I (por - Amethyst to Cucamonga Creek $3,730,000 tion) 4. Lower Heilman Storm Drain 6- C,E,F,H,I Heilman Ave. -Palo Alto $3,000,000 to Cucamonga Creek with various side drains 5. Alta Loma Channel 3 -A,B,C Foothills to Alta Loma $3,000,000 Basins plus side drains 0 tx 4 1. 0 STORM DRAIN FONDS ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE PROJECT SUMMARY 1 Design Assessment District 79 -1 (Loan 1 year) 2. Design Beryl- P.edhill Storm Drain 3. Mist. Design and Plari-iin-g Studies 4. Misc. Construction Drainage Facilities Sapphire @ Banyan - extend Catch Basins 4th Street @ Archibald - add Catch Basin Beryl @ 19th Street - Add Catch Basin and nuisance drain Total 0 n° A� ryt r� — yiy wy .: ' l $601,364 $400,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $100,364 $601,365 $232,458 $305,101 $420,000 $340,000 $ 76,725 $163,965 $1,538,249 i $480,000 $163,965 0 $258,241 $400,000 $ 21,000 $ 30,000 $ 15,000 $140,000 $ 30,043 1,538,249 �II 'v5 � Y `,':.' :�: ,,.. ,:.• ;I ; ;,, L^; , '�� �� ��n•(' 4J, t� << �:` ,, i. . , ' .• . � i !�• '1 h t'1 ��I'I 1 J �.1 �. � l I I' �f r f -I 1 �� 1.: � PROPOSED 1981 -82 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM REVENUE SUMMARY Gas Tay. !:106, 2107) $232,458 SB 325 $305,101 Sys=ems Development Funds $420,000 Federal Aid Urban Funds (Restricted) $340,000 Federal Grade Crossing Funds ( Pestricted) $ 76,725 Community Block Grant Funds (Restricted) $163,965 Total Revenue $1,538,249 EXPENDITUIM SUMMARY 1. vineyard Avenue Widening a Signals Eighth Street to Arrow.Route (FAU) $480,000 2. Phase 2 North Town Street Improvements (CDBG) Reid, Feron and Main Streets. $163,965 3. Deer Creek Bridges $258,241 4. Carnelian Street Realignment $400,000 5. Sapphire Street Reconstruction $-21,000 6. Archibald Reconstruction at Banyan and Highland $ 30,000 7. Demens Equestrian Bridge $ 15,000 8. Base Line Widening (cooperative project with Developer) Hermosa East $140,000 9. Assessment District 79 -1 Design $ 30,043 Total $1,538,249 .A 7 STAFF RECOMMENDED STORM DRAIN PRIORITIES CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PRIORITY PROJECT NAME. CSDP # LIMITS 1. Beryl- Heiiman Drain 2 -F, 2-1 (por- S. P. R. R_ @ Hellman tion) to N/0 19th @ Beryl 2. Hermosa - Turner Drain 4- A,B,C,Q Alta Loma Basin to Deer Creek plus lateral 3. Cucamonga Storm Drain 2-J, 2 -I (por4Lmethyst to Cucamonga Creek tion) 4. Lower Hellman Storm Drain 6- C,E,F,H,I Heilman Ave. -Palo Alto to Cucamonga Creek with various side drains 5. Alta Loma Channel 3 -A,B,C Foothills to Alta Loma Basins plus side drains `I �J EST. COST $1,175,000 $5,500,000 $3,730,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 ENGINEERING DIVISION LONG RANGE CAPITAL IMPP.OVEiia,"NTS PROJECT PRIORITIES MAJOR PROJECT PRIORITY PRIORITY STREET LIMITS/DESCRIPTION' ®, ESTIMATED COST 1- Vineyard Avenue Eight St- to Arrow Rte. (FAJ) $480,00C Widening and Signals 2- Carnelian Street Vineyard to Church Realign Curves $400,000 3- Base Line Road East and West of Hermosa $140,000 Widening and Reconstruction 4- Hellman Avenue @ Foothill Blvd. Widening, Drainage and 5350,000 Signals 5- Grove Avenue Eighth to Foothil l $762''00 Wi4enin g• Si gnal Modifications 6- Hellman Avenue Base Line to SPRP $327.200 Widening and Drainage 7- %i4J son Avenue @ Alta Loma Channel $ 30,000 Culvert Crossing 8- Turner Avenue @ Foothill Blvd. Signals, Widening, Drainage $300,p� 9- Hermosa Avenue @ SPRB Widening and Drainage $350,000 10- Hellman Avenue @ ATSSF RR Widening and Drainage $350,000 11- Turner Avenue @ ATSSF RR Widening and Drainage $330,000 12- Ramona Avenue @ SPRR Widening and Drainage $350,000 13. Hellman. Avenue San Bernardino Rd. to Church st_ $ 85,800 Widening 14- Archibald Avenue 19th St. to Highland Ave. $ 84,000 Realignment and Widening 15. Beryl Avenue Lemon to 500 ft. North $ 30,000 Widening and Reconstruction 9 _ �Y a STORM D_ -?GIN FUNDS ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE PROJECT SUMMARY 1. Design Assessment District 79 -1 (Loan 1 year) 2. Design Beryl•Redhill Storm Drain 3. Misc. Design and Planning Studi.en 4. Misc- Construction Dra_nage Facilities Sapphire @ Banyan - Extend Catch Basins 4th Street @ Archibald - Add Catch Basin Beryl @ 19th Street - Add Catch Basin and nuisance drain Total $601,364 $400,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $100,364 $601,365 40 PRIORI::: 16. 17. 13. 11 U S T Arrow Route Church Street Base Line Road L!Y,IiS /DLSC RIPTI OAS Archibald to Haven Widening Center to Haven Widening Alta Cuesta to West City Limits ESTIMATED COST $ 82,000 $ 73,200 S 34.900 $4,559,600 I ENGINEERING DIVISIOA* LONG RANGE CAPITAL T14PROV14ENTS PROGRAM ARTERIAL RESURFACING AND RECONSTRUCTION PRIORITIES PRIORITY STREET LIMITS /DESCRIPTION ESTZ.4ATED COST �- Carnelian Street Highland to Banyan $15,000 Resurfacing 2- Archibald Avenue Minor Reconstruction $ S/O highland Avenue 30,000 S/O Banyan 3- Sapphire Street Thoroughbred to Jannet $ 21,000 Reconstruction 4. Hermosa Avenue S/O Nineteenth Street to'Victoria $ 26,000 Resurfacing 5• Archibald Avenue Fourth to Nineteenth Street $400,C00 Resurfacing (Phased) 6. Victoria Avenue Pecan to Etiwarda $ 20,000 Resurfacing 7- Lemon Avenue Hermosa to Cartilla a 16,500 Resurfacing 2. Base Line Road I -15 to Etiwanda $ 22,009 Widening and Resurfacing 9. Hillside Road Amethyst to Beryl $ 40,000 Resnrf'_cing 10. Hillside Road Rancho Wash'to Carnelian $ 20,000 Resurfacing 11. Beryl Avenue Manzanita to Hillside $ 50,000 Resurfacing 12. Hermosa Avenue S/O Victoria St. (see #4) Resurfacing 13. Hellman Avenue Church Street to Base Line $ 32,000 Resurfacing 14. Church Street Archibald to Hellman $ 32,009' Resurfacing 15. Carnelian Street Banyan to Demens Channel $ 31,000 Resurfacing �RIOR27. LIMITS /D£ECRIPTI ON l ESTIMATED COST 16 . Nineteenth street to Summit 17. 46,600 18- Resurfacing 19. 20- Foothill to 23rd Street 21 22- 23. is 24. (see 125) 25. resurfacing 26- 27. 2i- 29. 30. 31. 32. STREET LIMITS /D£ECRIPTI ON l ESTIMATED COST East Avenue Nineteenth street to Summit $ 46,600 Resurfacing Etiwanda Avenue Foothill to 23rd Street $150,100 Resurfacing (phased) Arethyst Street Various N/O Nineteenth Street (see 125) resurfacing Ninth Street Vineyard to Grove $ 36,:'00 Resurfacing Fell an Avenue Cucamonga Creek to Arrow $ 311(00 Resurfacing and Reconstructior. Turner avenue Fourth Streit to 26th Street $ :8,`00 Resurfacing Vineyard Avenue Carnelian t.) Base Line $ 27,C00 Resurfacing Baker Street 8th Street to 9th Street $ 20,`100 Resurfacing Berl'_ Avenue Base Line to Banyan $ 49,5)0 Resurfacing Amethyst Avenue Base Line to Highland $ 4C,0)0 Resurfacing Hillside Road Archibald to Haven $ 35,0,10 Resurfacing Base Line Foad Haven to Etix ands $ 77,5 10 Arrow Route Vineyard to Baker $ I 40,0i �0 Banyan Street Beryl to Carn•>_lian $ i 6, 0,j0 Highland Avenue Archibald to F!ermosa $ 10,0(0 San Bernardi.io Rd Archibald to Eellman $ 3510( Fourth Street (N /S)Cuca-nonga Creek to Hellman $135,0(1,0 $1,668.,8t b is C ENGINEERING DIVISION LONG RANGE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PRCGRA14 SPECIAL PROJECTS PROJECT DESCRIPTION E3111'iA LD COST Guard Rail Renlaeement Turner @ Church $ 4,800 Hellman @ Foothill 6,500 Hellman @ 8th Street $ 2 %,000 Turner @ 8th Street $ 6,900 Turner @ Foothill $ 20,100 Haven Aven;.e, Deer Creek to Highland Avenue $ 345,000 r.11ev Reconstruction S/O Foothill - Archibald to Klusman $ 37,000 N/O Foothill - E/O Archibald @ Court House S 7,600 NIO Rase Line 17 10 Citv Offices $ 18,000 S/O Foothill W/O and Darallel to Archibald $ 4,200 N/n Arrow -Hellman •:o Carnelian $ E/O Archibald S/O & Parallel to Foothill Blvd_ 51500 $ 48,600 Milliken Avenue Grade Separation at Santa Fe Railroad (R /W Protection) $5,104,00? Haver. Avenue Grade Serration at Santa Fe Railroad (R /W Protection) 53,176,000 Seventh Street Interchange with I -15 Include (R /W Protection) No Cost Foothill Interchange with I -15 (P /W Protection) No Cost Demens Channel Equestrian Bridge at Jasper Street $ 15,000 Deer Creel; Bridge Betterments $258,241 Local Street Resurfacing /Seal Coats att aci ed map) (current backlog) $350,000 5G,000 Future Local Street Resurfacing /Seal Coats SlOG,.000 a - RECO,VIMMIDED TRAFFIC SIGNAL PRIORITY REC0Y..! -rXDE3 PRIORITY INTERSECTION 1 Carnelian and Lemon 2 Archibald and Fourth 3 Modify Grove and Arrow 4 Archibald and Sixth Street 5 Carnelian and San Bernardino Rd 6 Archibald and 19th Street STATUS To be completed by developer Under study by CP?.TP.ANS 60 , 000 50,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 60,000 50,000 TOTAL $910,000 ESY'_IMATED COST $60,000 50,000 60,000 80,000 60,000 7 Base Line and Beryl Street 8 ?,odify Grove and San Bernardino Rd 9 Fodi:v Grove and Ninth Street 1_0 Vineyard and Ninth Street li 19th Street and Beryl Street 12 19th Street and Amethyst 13 19th Street and Hellman Avenue 14 Sapphire and 19th Street 15 Fco_hill and Red Hill Country Club Dr =6 Archibald and Ninth Street Hellman. and Foothill - high priority if SWC and SEC developments to go in. Move to n2_ E. FJ C'TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 1.3, 1982 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: DRAFT MWIROWENTAL MACT REPORT ON COMPREHENSIVE STORM DRAM PLAN REVISION NO. 1 ABSTRACT: This report presents the Draft Environmental Impact Report on the Comprehensive Storm Drain Plan Revisio--I%c. 1 to the Planning Com ission for renew and recommendation to the City Council for certification. BACKGROUND: In conformance with the Califormla Environnemtal Quality Act and State Guide- lines, this document has been prepared to allow the adoption of Revision. No. 1 to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Comprehensive Storm Drain Master Plan. In 1979 the City retained the firm of L. D. King to prepare the master plan revision. After nearly two years of research, study and review by local agenices, the Flood Control District and the City Storm Drain Committee a recommended plan has been proposed for adoption. It is this plan which is the subject of this Environmental Impac, Report. Attached to this report is an addendum listing the agencies that received a copy of the DEIR. In addition, copies of all comments made by the reviewing agencies and our Engineering Staff's responses are included. The Master Plan of Storm Drains drain construction in the City. or directly impact the Physical time a project is implemented. completed. It is during that a alternative should be analyzed. is the beginning step in the guidance of storm The Plan itse:[f does not construct facilities environment. these impacts would occur at the Further environmental analysis should then be oalysis that the major physical impacts and It is the Engineering Staff's findings that the DEIR on Comprehensive Storm Drain Plan Revision No. 1 and the storm drain priorities are consistent with the City's General Plan and therefore recommend adoption of the plan. RECOM-MENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider approval of the attached Resolution recommending completion of public review, certification and adoption of the Environmental Impact Report to the City Council. Respectfully Submitted, LBH:bc Attachments ITEM P RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION'OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, RECOMMENDING PUBLIC REVIEW, CERTIFICATION AND ADOPTION OF THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE STORM DRAIN PLAN REVISION NO. 1 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has duly considered and reviewed the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Comprehensive Storm Drain Plan Revision No. 1; and WHEREAS, the Draft Environmental Impact Report has been pre- pared in conform ty with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEW of 1970 as amended and contains potential mitigation measures and possible alternatives that might be caused or found necessary in the adoption of Revision No. 1 to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Comprehensive Storm Drain Master Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recommends that the City Council complete the psblic review, certification, and adoption of the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Comprehensive Storm Drain Plan Revision No. 1 as being an adequate review of potential environmental impacts including potential mitigation measures and all alternatives where necessary. BE IT FJRTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga finds comprehensive Storm Drain Plan consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and reconmends to the City Council adoption of Comprehensive Storm Drair Revision No. 1. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1982. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission Resolution No- Page 2 ® I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Cummission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foreCning Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adcptc, by the riz =r =ing Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of January, 1982, by the following vote - to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Cl :x. FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COMPREHENSIVE STORM DRAIN PLAN REVIST_ON 81 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA 0 I. AGENCIES RECEICIIQG DRAFT DOCUN'.ENTS The following agencies received Draft Environmental Impact Reports. Those preceded by an asterisk made comments on the Draft document. Copies of all co= nts received with responses are included in the next section. *1. The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California 2. Foothill Fire Frotection District *3. Chino Basin Municipal Water District 4. Chino Basin 'Water Conservation District *5. California Regional Water Quality Control Board - Santa Ana Region 6. City of Fontana *7. City of Ontario 8. City of Upland 9. Southern California Association of Governments 10. San Bernardino County Flood Control District 11. San Bernardino County Environmentaa. impact Agency 12. Building Industry Association 13. San Bernardino County Association of Governments *14, CalTrans District #03 *15. State Clearinghouse *16. Department of Water Resources IZ. RESPONSES TO COMMMS RECEIVED A. CalTrans District #08 Comments Summary: Cal:rans District 0£ comments address the potential impact of the proposed storm, drain lines with respect to such items as: 1) State Route 30 (Foothill Freeway) Right -of -way. 2) Line encasement. 3) Right -of -way encroachment permits. 4) Storm drain maintenance responsibility within Stare Highway Right -of -Way. Response: The City of Rancho Cucamonga will establish early and continuous liaison with CalTrans upon commencement of proposed construction Plans as they affect line encasement, encroachment, lines running parallel to and traversing State Route 30 (Foothill Free - woy), State 3ig'nway rights- of_way, or any proposed improvements thereto. Responsibility for maintenance of storm drain amines within State highway rights- of-way will also be addressed at that time. B. Chino Basin Municipal Water District Comments Summary: Chino Basin Municipal Water District comments regarded the potential impact of the storm drain lines upon their Non - reclaimable Waste Collection System and Domestic Waste Interceptor Lines. The District requests that the agency responsible for implementation of the proposed storm drain lines also be responsible for the protection and /or relocation of affected facilities. Response: The City of Rancho Cucamonga In reviewing all preliminary end fl-ial construction plans for storm drain facility installations will request a review of the same by affected agencies or utilities; and, thereupon will address responsibility for pro- tection and /or relocation of affected facilities. C. %ne Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Comments Summary: The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California request that any development that could affect the District's facilities and its fee property and easements be brought to their attention prior to commencing construction. 9 Response: Refer to B. Above. D. California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region Comments Summary: The California Regional Water Quality Control Board - Santa Ana Region, has requested that a draft of the proposed plan to maximize the ground- water recharge potential, as referred to on page 34 of the DEIR, be submitted to their office. Response: '!'he City of Rancho Cucamonga is continuing to study the maximizing of groundwater recharge potential utilizing retention facilities existing or proposed within and to the north of the City. Upon completion, a draft of the proposed plan to maximize the groundwater recharge will be made available to affected agencies. E. Department of Water Resources Comments Summary: The Department of Water Resources recommends that the following areas should be considered in the preparation of the DEIR_ 1. Non - structural alternatives for the storm drain plan. 2_ Any impact to fish and wildlife habitat originated by this project. 3. Any impact to groundwater, such as percolation rate, quantity, and quality. Response: E Areas within the now existant Rancho Cucamonga Ci y Limits have in recent years been deciared "in a state of emergency" as a result of flood disasters. "Non - structural" drain facilities such as creeks and revines within City Limits have been investigated and found to be inadequate; therefore, designs to channelize the same have been implemented. Major creeks such as Cucamonga, Deer, and Dement' Creeks have /or are presently being channelized. Considering that the creeks canyon runoff and no bodies life, there is no impact to hills and canyons are those Although there is no unique vegetative cover and food r wildlife habit. and ravines are subject to receiving seasonal of water remained year -round to support fish fish. Wildlife habitat found below the foot - typically more tolerant of man's presence. or endangered species, the loss of some :sources will cause a slight reduction of said EI I* r C :he City of Rancho Cucamonga is continuing to study the maximizing Of groundwater recharge potential utilizing retention facilities existing or proposed witinin and to tfie north of the City. Upon completion, a draft of the proposed plan to maximize the $roandwater recharge will be made available. GOVERNoR•S OFFICE OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH !OIdL. 1400 TENTM STREET SACRAMENTO 938;4 EDMUND c. BROWN in. - �- n .t, c• 8, 1981 October 2 Lloyd B. Hubbs , Engineer City En C: ^'! C; City of Rancho Cucamon 0 i�y �,CV;'r �a P_0_ ]I-,x Rn7 ° Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 l F:d SUBJECT: SCH'" 31072412 *' ^ ' "'c CCN� $dSTi�'��IURM'`DItFCIIv�rPi.AN REVISION 01 Dear Mr. Hubbs: State agencies have commented on YOU= draft environmental j=oact attached)- 1£ you �auld like to discuss t`leir concerns and rec epr (see ?lease contact the stsff from the a?_roor? ate agencies. caLO�, nre^`ore_ti.g :e _i_^al L =?. jc.1,, mr.st r.clude 3:.1 coaaer_t; and rasxr_ses :C=Yrt „uideli :es. Seet-on 151 6). -'-e certified =g =:;t be cons'dP -2d in the cec:s ter.- aki^_c ?rocess for the ?roject. Ia addition, we -urge you to resoond ^_ir2ct__, to t .e 3genC4eS '='dents by 42it4=9 to r: -.em, including the Stat Cleari=_chouse mumber on a -' cor_es ?ondence. e =zcent ;m =e_:ate court decisicn it Cl r2�-'• = =�.e ::.i f =r r°S: C.^ <•• '•C rEV' ^ea.! 7. :.y -L:r •:7 .^.f StSriSlaus Clirif!2d _ - •--_•7 - .2•N _Cmmcn=s _ SpeC.=SC3l , the --curt • -: -Gated -_• -- - - -ents =.I--z be a°dd= =sled in detail, 9 :7 „_a reasons whV t!"e She con: ° -• ^•ts and suzgesti o.^s were not accepted and factors Of ove:ri i-,g fair= Knee warr3atcac an owe ^ice of =-e suggestion. 3es -acto to c coreluso sts o=er_ts a-st not - _�er_ts but asst be supported by empirical or experiaentai data, sci °rt___c aLt_ior_t7 or a lanatory __ oration Of any kind. The court £;suer said that the rescorses must be a good fai th, reasoned _ns3ysis. Section 1=CC2(f) of tie �;. Guideli=es requires that acove_- naeral agezr3 take certain actions if an Z� shcw6 substantial adverse env� =Omntal impacts could result from a project. These actions include cbA=gi_n the project, :mDOSizg condition; cn the ?- 03ect, adopting plan or Ordinances to avoid the =oblem, selecting an alternative to the project, or d•Li app roviag the project. the event that t .e pro; eet is d roved :r�thout ad•°q•.xate mi tigati.on Of siq.,,.!i.cant of £nets, tie lead oaency must make .rr:tten f-4.-dings for each siyuz-:foam Effect (Section 15•]98) and it gust support its a ,ors with s written statement cf awe =ri+ina considerations for each unmitigated $< < - 11 effect %Sectior. 15029) . ?reject recuires dfiled ionary approval :nom any state agency, the :1 Ce of �etQ-i.nat :an �:st be -=led :nit_ t'Te Seere tar'[ for Resources, as well as with �.e Cou.^_ _y Clerk. ? lease = onto= Terry Roberts at (515) e.: = -• 613 r you have An' :nest -0 SseQre y, C- Lz .zghcuse y S- ateeFCalifornio _. _ &mnem, TarnspareMien and [iw"nq MST _Memorandum �ya Ms. Ann Barkley, DOTP Datft October 15, 1981 Attention Xr_ D. 3susum Fae , 0 S- sBd -15- 3.066/5.3( A -95 Coordinator 66- 4.083/9.89 -` 9107.2.4J2- From : ` DEPARTMENr OF TRANSPC5Z AM0N District 08 Subject: DEM for Comr_rehensive Storm Drain Plan Revision 41 W_ have .reviewed the above- refcrenced document and request consider- arion of the following: Th^ report should include and consider the status of State Route '30 (Foothill Freeway) since several proposed storm drains would cross that route. Route 30, between. Damien Avenue in La Verne and Interstate 15E in San Bernardino, is presently being considered for abandonment due to lack of funding in the foreseeable future. Until a final decision is reached, limited funds have been authorized for right of Way protection to preserve the corridor while various options are being considered- For facilities proposed within state highway rights cf way, we suggest the following: 1. Lines parallel to the highway should be placed outside of the state highway right of way, particularly controlled- access facilities. 2. Transverse lines should cross the highway at right angles. 3. Lines may be required to be encased within the highway rights of way for ease of maintenance_ It is anticipated that an encroachment permit will be needed, and Caltrans, as a responsible agency, may require that certain mitigation measures be provided as condition for issuance of a permit. We urge early and continuous liaison with Caitrans on proposed construction plans as they affect state highways and relative to compatibility with proposed or existing state facilities. The document should address responsibility for maintenance of the storm drain lines located within state highway rightsof way. 0 i Ms. Ann Barkley att Mr. D. F4us%= Page 2 October 15, 1981 FiTare D, RECOMMEMED PLAN MAP, is of such poor quality that it is difficult to determine exactly where our rligh!wrays miy;t be impacted. Please include a better copy of the map in the final document. We would like a cop-J' Of the final document as soar. as it is available. I£ you have any questions, please contact Linda Laurin at (714) 383 -4554. 1, R. G. POT% Chief, -- --ars, rtation Planning. LGL:ob cc: G£Boon File Ms. Ann Barkley att Mr. D. F4us%= Page 2 October 15, 1981 FiTare D, RECOMMEMED PLAN MAP, is of such poor quality that it is difficult to determine exactly where our rligh!wrays miy;t be impacted. Please include a better copy of the map in the final document. We would like a cop-J' Of the final document as soar. as it is available. I£ you have any questions, please contact Linda Laurin at (714) 383 -4554. 1, R. G. POT% Chief, -- --ars, rtation Planning. LGL:ob cc: G£Boon File S*are df California .MlernoranJum Tern, Roberts S*.te Clearinghouse :500 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 Resources Agjeacy of Califs rnia I Dore. October 1, 1981 From : California Regional Water Quality Control Board —Santa Ana Region 5609 INDIANA AVENUE. SUITE 2M. W VERSIDE. CA 82508 8- 632 -4130 I Subieel: SCH r 81072412, COMPREHENSIVE STORM DRAIN PLAN REVISION NO. I —DEI? Review of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) Comorehensive Storm Drain Plan Revision No. 1 has been completed t� this office. The DEIR (0.14) states that further attention should be given to maximizing the groundwater recharge potential within the plan area. A draft of the proposed plan to maximize the groundwater recharge potential should be submitted to this office. If there are any questions regarding these cor<ments olease feel free to contact this office. Michael G. Serrato Staff Engineer MGS:kyb �r I i 1 I:Xr3p -W ®IE;..% CITY MALL OWTARIO. CALIFORNIA 91764 ®14%wr'AR3:Q PREA CODE 714 _- 986• ST ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT October 21, 198 CITY OF R. f:C!:0 CUCAMONr4 Cor"UNI i Y CCVE10PfdFNT DEPT. Mr. Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer fipR PU CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 718f�lmf�If�f�l2ii4t$1$ P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Hubbs: DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT COMPREHENSIVE STORM DRAIN PLAN, REVISION NO. 1 This is to infcrm you that the City of Ontario, Engineering Department, concurs with the findings of the above subject Environmental Impact Report as submitted to us for review and have no comments. Thank you For the opportunity to participate in the review process. Cordia 1y, LAWP.ENCE A. TOERPER Assistant City Engineer LAH:lle 0 CtiCAGiO.1GA TY Ri.itC .. CG11PlUr�iTY Off' OP LENT DEPT. Ad PH October 12, 1981 Mr. Lloyd Hubbs, Eng. Division City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Dept. P.O. Box 807 Cucamonga, CA 91730 Oear Mr. Hubbs: f $. CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL W A T E R DISTRICT TELEPHONE M41 987 -1712 THEO T. NOWAK GENERAL MANAGER Subject: Draft EIR, Comprehensive Storm Drain Revisions No. 1 Thank you for the opportunity to review the subject EIR. in addition to our normal response to environmental impact report announcements wherein we refer to our primary service functions, (Regional Domestic Waste Water Treatment and Disposal, Non - reclaimable Waste Collection, Importation of Supplemental Water and Management of the Chino Groundwater Basin) we wish to direct your attention to the following. Many of the proposed storm drain channels may affect the District's Non - reclaimable Waste Collection system and Domestic Waste Interceptor Lines. If the adopted storm drain does affect the District's facilities, we request that the agency responsible fo: implementing the plan also be responsible for the protection and /or relocation of these affected facilities. Your attention to this item will be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned. Sincerely, Theo T Nowak, General CHIN .BASIN M6N�CIPAL N i Dona d R. Peters Office Manager DRP /MNK/mw Manager WATER DISTRICT 8755 ARCHIBALD "CNUC . POST OFFICE DOR 607 . CUCAMO CG ChL4F0RNIA 9IT50 it 6 GILDAT OEORGE A 8009A i, JCNN L ANDERSON COWARD A. oIRARD ^aW,G1+T i. PRLNd ^w'+V' 'rw,fdeR[ - 4{erPii i6wt S,eW,�ro/: nwr.r. Amt. Swmft,WT.,R , Di New The Wetropolitan Water District of Southern California Mr. Lloyd B. Hubbs SSP 2 "u 1987 r City Engineer Community Development Department C����c �_: «vi ENT DEY •. dam. Engineering Division t� ti• Z a 19`1 P. O. Box 807 C0 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 :ear Mr. Lubbs= 1 ,aLy�Zti2t Draft EIR Comoreher_sive Storm Drain Plan Revison No. 1 Thank you for your letter, dated September 9, 1981, transmitting the Draft Environmental ImFact Report (EIR) for the proposed storm drain plan revisions. Based or. your comprehensive storm drain plan, Plate 1, a portion of Metropolitan's Rialto pipeline and Upper Feeder pipeline are located within the boundaries of the project area. In System 2 -2 storm drains 2A, 2F and 27: would cross our 10 -foot- inside- diameter Rialto Reach pipeline. In System 2 -3 storm drain 3x would cross ou= 8- foot - inside - diameter Rialto pipeline. In System 2 -4 storm drain 4B would cross oir 10- foot — inside- diameter Rialto pipeline. In System 2 -5 storm drain 5D, System 2 -6 storm drain 6E, -ystem 2 -7 storm drain 7A, an-3 System 2 -19 storm drains 19A and 19D dll would cross our 12 -foot 8- inch - inside - diameter Upper Feeder pipeline. Any development that could affect Metropolitan's facilities and its fee property and easements must be brought to our attention prior to commencing construction. Plan and profile drawings of our pipelines may be obtair:ed by calling Mr. Jim Hale, telephone (213) 626 -4282, extension 364. We appreciate your cooperation in keeping us informed of your development activities. p g Very truly yours, , Glen W. Smith Principal Engineer Environmental Planning Branch DX4 /rg l 'J 11 STATE Of CAU7011IN1A— RESOUNC£5 AGENCY EOMUNO c. GWWN M. G. DEPARTMENT OF WATER i `SOURC> =S P. O. 8m 6574 LOS ANGELES 90055 (213) 620 -4107 P i CITY CF .2 ?. mo CUCAMONGA COVM11N1TX JEVE: OPMENT DEPT. M7 E 7981: City of Rancho Cucamonga Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 GGT 9 1931 MA FAA Z tgt9e�t1- It12�1t2t3t4t5t� Attention: Mr. Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Manager Notice of Preparation of a DEIR for Revision of Comprehensive Storm Drain Plan. SCH 81072412 The Department of Water Resources recommends that the following areas should be considered in the preparation of the DEIR. 3. Any impact to ground water, much as percolation rate, quantity, and quality. The City of Cucamonga is participating in the regular phase of the National Flood Insurance Program (,%71?). Because a very large portion of the City is designated as special flood hazard area, the development and design of this comprehensive storm drain plan should be adapted to the requirements and guidelines established for the NFIP. Completion by tae U. S. Corps of Engineers' Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Project will rerove this hazard. Sincerely, Robert Y. D. Chun, Chief Planning Branch Southern District cc: Office of Planning and Research State Clearinghouse 1400 Tenth Street Sacramento, CA 95814 1. Non - structural alternatives for the storm drain plan. ® 2. Any impact to fish and wildlif a habitat originated by this project. 3. Any impact to ground water, much as percolation rate, quantity, and quality. The City of Cucamonga is participating in the regular phase of the National Flood Insurance Program (,%71?). Because a very large portion of the City is designated as special flood hazard area, the development and design of this comprehensive storm drain plan should be adapted to the requirements and guidelines established for the NFIP. Completion by tae U. S. Corps of Engineers' Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Project will rerove this hazard. Sincerely, Robert Y. D. Chun, Chief Planning Branch Southern District cc: Office of Planning and Research State Clearinghouse 1400 Tenth Street Sacramento, CA 95814 O2x T 1r ..��.1 .;1 F'ti W SYI La .w...w 31 -.32 �� CMS .Y �w��y� /I�OwWO �Ip.11IyM O'A'�.q�l. ®.V/4I iw1 I�/IF •✓ �.�• •Vlf �YtiF � CITY �O�F/ RANCHO C�UCAMONGA o .+a..�..�.�.. �......� /9B2 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 13, 1982 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Master Plan of Drainage for the Victoria Development ABSTRACT: This report presents the Master Plan of Drainage for the Victoria Development to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation to the City Council for adoption and certification. BACKGROUND: The full drainage master plan includes three areas of the City: the first element covered under contract to L. D. King included the areas west of Deer Creek plus the industrial area south of Foothill Boulevard, west of Day Creek; the remaining two elements are the drainage plans for the Victoria and Terra Vista Planned Communities. These three areas as shown in Figure C encompass the bulk of the City exlusive of the 'ctiwanda Specific Plan area. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Victoria Development encompasses an area of about 2,100 acres c and in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and is divided into two basic sections. One being the area east of Day Creek (referred to as. the eastern sec- tion) and the other, the area w-st of Day Creek (referred to as the western sec- tion). The eastern section is bounded by Etiwanda Avenue on the on the east, Day Creek on the west, Highland Avenue on the north, and the Devore Freeway on the south. T:ie western section is bounded by Deer Creek on the west, Day Creek on the cast, Highland Avenue on the north, aria Base Line Road on the south. The entire eastern section including its tributary drainage areas will discharge its flow into Day Creek in the ultimate scheme of the Project. The major portion of the western section which is between Milliken Avenue and Day Creek, including the northerly tributary drainage areas will discharge its flow into Day Creek, while the miner portion of this section, which is between Milliken Avenue and Deer Creek, including its northerly tributary drainage areas, will discharge its flow into Deer Creek. The Deer Creek system is currently undergoing federally funded improvements designed and coordinated by the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. The improved facility from Deer Creek spreading grounds to Haven Avenue is expected to be completed by December 1982. An overall comprehensive study for the Day Creek system is currently underway by the surrounding cities, counties, private land owners, and private consulting engineering firms. It is therefore anticipated that there will be future improvements to the Day Creek spreading grounds to enable it to store a signifi- cant volume of storm runoff for water conservation purposes, and that there will also be future improvements to the Day Creek channel itself to allow for more Planning Commission Staff Report Master Plan of Drainage for Victoria Development January 13, 1982 Page 2 9 capacity in the event of major storms. The tributary drainage north of Highland Avenue (see Exhibit or natural state will be collected in graded earth ditches o Highland Avenue and carried to points of discharge as shown points of discharge will be fully improved inlet structures enough to accept a 25 year storm (area fully developed) or a undeveloped) whichever is greater. D) in an undeveloped n the north side of on Exhibit A. The in pipes sized large 100 year storm (area The basic criteria of design of the streets and storm drain system for this project will be as follows: 1. Minimum rate of grade for all streets will be 0.5 %. 2. The combination of storm drain and streets shall be designed to carry a 25 year storm flow up to the top of curb. 3. Streets shall also be designed to carry a 100 year storm flow from R/W to R/W at which point it will be picked up by a storm drain system. 4. All storm drair. systems with the exception of Line "I" (See Exhibit A) will be sized for a 25 year storm with the residual of a 100 year storm being handled in the street system until it reaches a point of pickup by a storm drain system. 5. All sump catch basins and storm drains will be sized for a 50 year storm with provisions for a secondary outfall route. However, in situations where secondary outfall is extremely difficult without costly hinderance to the development, no secondary route will be required provided the catch basins and storm drains attributed to the particular sump condition are sized based on a 100 year storm. CONCLUSION: It is the City Engineer's finding that the Victoria Master Plan of Drainage has been developed according to accepted engineering practice and that it is consistent with the Rancho Cucamonga Master Plan of Storm Drains of which it is to be a part. The plan is also consistent with the Victoria Community Plan and the recommendations set forth in its Environmental Impact Report. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider approval of the attached resolution recommending review and adoption of the Master Plan by the City Council. Respectfully sub fitted, LBH:j Attachments 11 140. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG,A RECOMMENDING PUBLI: REVIEW AND ADOPTION OF THE MASTER PLAIT OF DRAINAGE FOR THE VICTORIA DEVELOPM WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has duly considered and reviewed the Master Plan of Drainage for the Victoria Development; and WHEREAS, the Master Plan of Drainage for the Victoria Development has been found to be consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recommends that the City Counc_1. complete the public review and adoption of the Master Plan of Drainage for the Victoria Developm=t as being a significant element of the City's Comprehensive Drainage Plan. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1982. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Plam-wing Commission I, JACK LAII, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was. duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of January, 1982, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: r' is :If 'ii S E, �G E G , .: /•Jlk fit. {,�g/ �♦ §. ry i�. �. t + c. U vt• . lip I a• 'J- r. ^,�1 L`:��q� j�,::�QJ� ` � � .1. °yr•��1..� .sL+��_p�u' tt i :U _ - y 5 ,,.•' Coq. -�'Y. � fP/ �- '- as � 11j ' � � •Z - •.ar'�= ♦ 1 + .. >v ' L � `.7' �: t— � �y Y -� i -S�'.• `�� i : �0� :..; •c, Z Y >�Ili � • ~y• ♦ If r' r c .� __ t. k ♦ a a� O 1 Itl Ails �Qi/10Nd.I //10'7 % 5GT7�0 .1Yi71f✓.Y� i 14 N � ti ��obbbbb ajt i =ii iE tiYS �p s- ��o 3�q�S 8 .2 Mio a� ai a ice! J R'f 0 ,.iY c� ' rwrrr.�r.rr y..rr . � Or YY�rr� • �rr�r . 9 i f t KmAt 11i+.' Z f_y�- [(_�1`��`_- .. _ ..._ _ .. •. _ Try _ µ