HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982/06/09 - Agenda PacketI
f
^o c.
a n
� x
t0 3
i
a
Co
CL
N C
r sw
O
7 a,
0
�n
e+ Cc
cm
i r+•
to
o
co
i
N
i
1
(Trf OF
�- RANCH0 CUCAMONGA
Ci` o PLA+�N�TN�I�NG C0MMISSI0l
L77 WEDNESDAY JUNE 9, 1982 7:00 P.M.
LIONS PARK COMMUNITY CENTER
9161 BASE LINE,.RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
A C T I O N S I. Pledge of Allegiance
II. Roil Cali
Commissioner King Ex. Ab, Commissioner Stout X
Commissioner Rempel X Commissioner Tolstoy X
APA Section Award III. Announcements
Banquet - 6/24/82
Bing's Restaurant, S.B. IV. Consent Calendar
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to
be routire and non - controversial. They will be actid
upon by the Commission at one time without discussion.
If anyone has concern over any item, then it should be
removed for discussion.
Approved 3 -0 -1 A. VACATION OF 22nd STREET AND 20' ALLEY - .LUCAS LAND -
The vacation of 22nd Street and 20' alley located
south of 8th Street and east of Center Avenue -
APN 209 - 241 -1, 2 & 9.
Approved 3 -0 -1 with 2
additional conditions.
w
V. Public Hearings
The following items are Public Hearings in which concerned
individuals may voice their opinion of the related project.
Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address
the Commission from the public microphone by giving your
name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to
5 minutes per individual for each project.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 10246 -
ALKHASEH /ASSAD - A custom lot subdivision of ten
acres of land into 15 lots located in the R- 1- 20,000
(Single Family Residential /20,000 sq. ft. lot minimim
zone on the southwest corner of Hillside Road and
Haven Avenue - APH 201 - 111 -14.
Approved 3 -0 -1 C.
Approved 3-0-1 D.
Planning Commission Agenda
June 9, 1982
Page 2
ASSESSMEN',' AND PARCEL NAP 7451 -
+..,, ., L 'IL+ unI Jn111IJ - n YIV iD IIJFI VI G./
acres into 2 parcels within the R- 1- 20,000 zone
located on the southwest corner of Wilson and
Haven Avenues - APN 201- 181 -11.
I..•c„vn,- ,.,,I/. GJJLJ J,-f Llll I Sw V,1 " I'Inr I —
TACKETT - A division of .91 acres into 4 lots
for residential use located between La Grande
Drive and Lomita Drive, west of Amethyst Street -
APN 202- 081 -13, 14.
Approved 3 -0 -1 with addi- E. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82 -09 - WHITEHEAD - The
tional condition and reduction proposed deve opmert of a dog kennel for raising
in number of dogs allowed. and breeding dogs in the A -1 zone on 1.85 acres
of land located at 8406 Hamilton Street - APN 202-
021-50.
Approved 3 -0 -1 F. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82 -06 - EASON - The temporary
use of an existing structure for a church facility
in the Industrial Park Category (Subarea 7), located
at 11837 Foothill Boulevard - APN 229 - 011 -21.
Approved 3 -0 -1 G. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82 -11 - WENZEL - The establish-
ment of a church in a 2628 square foot unit of an
industrial complex in the General Industrial area
(Subarea 4), located on the east side of Archibald
Avenue south of 6th Street - APN 210 - 071 -25.
Approved 3 -0 -1 with 2 addi- H. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 82 -03 - TT 10826 - LESNY - A change
tional conditions. of zone from R-1-20,000 (Single Family Residential -
1/2 acre lots) to R -2 /PD (Two Family Residential/
Planned Development) and the developirlent of 27 single
family units, 81 patio homes and 202 townhouse units
on 57.7 acres of land located between Haven and Hermosa,
approximately 660 feet south of Wilson - APN 201 - 181 -12,
13;14, 02, 63, 65, & 69.
VI. Director's Reports
Consensus to recommend City I. HAVEN AVENUE MEDIAN DESIGN
Council adoption of Jacaranda
tree for median. VII. Public Comments
This is the time and place for the general public to
address the Comudssion. Items to be discussed here
are those which do not already appear on this agenda.
af:
h
ri -
rIr
Planning Commission Agenda
June 9, 1982
Page 3
VIII. Upcoming Agenda
IX. Adjournment
The Planninq Commission has adopted Administrative
Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time.
Zf items go beyond that time, they shall be heard
only with the consent of the Commission.
The Planning Commission will adjourn to a Public
Hearing for the Terra Vista Planned Community to
be held at 7:00 p.m., 'Konday, June 14, 1982, at
the Lions Park Cor=m ty Center.
VICINITY'
wmii
ONTA*00 swrrRM I Yet An O&r:
CITY OF
} R NKI-iO CL CAMONGA
o PLANNING COTYMISSIO T
AGP..NM
1977 WEDNESDAY JUNE 9, 1982 7:00 P.M.
LIONS PARK COMMUNITY CENTER
r� 9161 BASE LINE,.RANCHO CUCAMONGA,, CALIFORNIA
I. Pledge of Allegiance
II. Roll Call
Commissioner King Commissioner Stout
Commissioner Rempel_ Commissioner Toistoy
���--
III. Announcements
IV. Consent Calendar
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to
be routine and non- controversial. Theg will be acted
upon by the Commission at one time without discussion.
Sf anyone has concern over a= item, then it should be
removed for discussion.
A. VACATION OF 22nd STREET AND 201 ALLEY - LUCAS LAND -
The vacation of 22nd Street and 209 alley located
south of 8th Street and east of Center Aver..ie -
APN 209- 241 -1, 2 & 9.
V. Public Hearings
The following ite= are Public Hearings in which concerned
individuals mg voice their opinion of the related project_
Please wait to be recognized by t:;e Chairman and address
the Commis :ion from the public microphone by giving your
name ar-d address. All such opinions shall be limited to
5 minutes per indIv ±,?ua1 for each project.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 10246 -
KHASER/ SAD - A custom lot subdivision of ten
acres of land into 15 lots located in the R =1- 20,000
(Single Family Residential /20,000 sq. ft. lot minimum)
zone on the southwest corner of Hillside Road and
Haven Avenue - APN 201 - 111 -14.
L `
r�
I
/� �•s�fitc�`( L�
/i
,.
x G�
VI.
Planning Commission Agenda
June 9, 1982
Page 2
C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 7451 -
CHURCH OF LATTER DAY SAINTS - A division of 2.7
acres into panes within the P -1- 20,000 zone
located on the southwest corner of Wilson and
Haven Avenues - APN 201 - 181 -11.
D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 7441
TACKE'iT - A division of .91 acres into 4 lots
For residential use located between La Grande
Drive and Lomita Drive, west of Amethyst Street -
APN 202 - 081 -13, 14.
E. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82 -09 - WHITEHEAD - The
proposed development of a dog kennel for raising
and breeding dogs in the A -1 zone on 1.85 acres
of land located, at 8406 Hamilton Street - APN 202-
021-50.
F. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82 -06 - EASON - The temporary
use of an existing structure for a church facility
it the Industrial Park Category (Subarea 7) , located
at 11837 Foothill Boulevard - APN 229- C1I -21.
G. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82 -11 - WENZEL - The establish-
ment of a church in a 26 "L8 square foot unit of an
industrial complex in the General Industrial area
(Subarea 4), located on the east side of Archibald
Avenue south of 6th Street - APN 210- 071 -25.
H. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 82 -03 - TT iC826 - LLSNY - A change
of zone from R-1-20,000 Single amillyy Residential-
1/2 acre lots) to R -2 /P3 (Tk-) Family Residential/
Planned Development) and the development of 27 single
family units., 81 patio hkw es and 202 townhouse units
on 57.7 acres of land located between Haven and Hermosa,
approximately 66-0 feet south of Wilson - APN 201 - 181 -12,
13, 14, 02, 53, 65, & 69.
Director's Reports
I. HAVEN AVENUE MEDIA. DESIGN
VII. Public Comments
TAUS is the time and place for the general public to
address the Commission. It to be discussed here
are those which do not already appear on this agenda.
Planning Commission Agenda
June 9, 1982
Page 3
VIII. Upcoming Agenda
IX. Adiournment
The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative
Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m, adjournment time.
If I eIIS 90 beyond that tim?, they shall be heard
onl9 with the consent of the Commission.
The Planning Commission will adjourn to a Pablic
Hearing for the Term Vista Planned Community to
be held at 7:00 p.m., 'Monday, June 14, 1982, at
the Lions Park Community Center.
i
r-
VICINITY'' MAP
WA. INKRWigNAL AM"
June 5, 1982
Department of planning
City of Rancho Cucamonga
c/o Mike Varin
9320 Base Line Road
Rancho Cucamonga, California
SUBJECT: Havenwood Planned Development by Lesney Development Co.
Dear Mr. Varin;
After meeting with Mr. Allan Lowy of Lesny
Development Co. and Mr. H. Ernest Reynolds of Reynolds
Environmental Groupto review the proposed Havenwood
Planned Development, it is a pleasure to be able to
congratulate both the city planning dept. and the developers
on a job well done.
As you are well aware from the many appearances
of Deer Creek homeowners Assc. Board Members at numerous
city planning commission meetings, we continue to be very
concerned that the new developmwnts that are built within
our general area reflect the same care in planning that
the city and developers put into the Deer Creek development.
At many times the the past years it may have
seemed that we were opposed to any development in our area
such as the proposed Havenwood complex, we are not. We have
been waiting for some developer to recognize that multi - family
housing in the form of condo's and single family housing can
be compatible when well planned.
Our only concern is in the traffic area. There
was some discuession that there would be no left turn lane
at the entrance on Haven directly across from the college.
That instead of a ldit hand turn lane, traffic would be routed
up tb Haven and Wilson to make a U -turn back down Haven and
then to enter the complex from a right hand turn. I would
like to remind you that Haven and Wilson is a dangerous place
to make a U -Turn do to the fact that the roll in the grade
at that point makes it impossible for a car traveling south
on Haven from north of Wilson to see any car coming north
on Haven untill it is completly in the intersection.
Please feel free to contact me for any additional
information you may need.
Y s my
Cu, "
CITY OE RANCHO CUCAMJ ONGA —
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT, Roy hauben
,�� 198 President Deer Creek Homeowners Assc.
11028 Wilson Ave.
AM to Alata Loma, Calif. 91701
718191>'J1111L11;213141S16
6809 Sard St.
Alta Loma, California 91701
June 8, 1982
Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission
9340 Base Line Road, Unit B
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701
To Whom It May Concern:
This letter is regard to the conditional use permit 82 -09
Whitehead. The proposed development of a dog kennel for raising
and breeding dogs in the A -1 zone on 1.85 acres of land located
at 8406 Hamilton Street. AFN 202- 021 -50.
I feel very strongly against any such permit being issued. Listed
below are my reasons why:
1. Barking dogs are already a concern of
the property owners in our area. An
increase in the number of dogs in the
area would add to this problem and cause
more noise.
2. Flies and other insects that breed in
droppings would be increased in our area.
This would be a nuisance and health hazard
that would have to be controlled.
3. The area is now mostly single family
units. A kennel, no matter how small,
would decrease property value. No one
wants to live by barking dogs, or put up
with the odor and flies caused by dog
droppings. A new person coming into
the area would think twice before buying
into this type of environment.
4. Waste water from this property now
flows into the street and down the
gutters. Waste water from a kennel
would be smelly and cause more problems
for other property owners.
I am presently employed by the County of San Bernardino and
work for Environmental Health Services. We receive complaints
` June 8, 1982
Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission -2-
regularly from people who live in the area of dog kennels. Once
these kennels are established and are zoned correctly, there local is
nothing we can do to help with the noise problem. I feel 1TERy
law enforcement will not help either. Therefore,
STRONGLY that this should not be allowed to be started in ar.
area that is mainly residential.
Flies and mosquitoes are already a problem in San Bernaadino County.
sanitary
There is no assurance that this kennel will be kept
manner. The odor and flies if it is not kept up will be a problem
to the entire neighborhood. Again, who will see that this is done
daily? I am sure that the Planning Departtuent andlthe *County does
dog and check weekly to see that this is done,
not send out men to inspect either. Hence it is a nuisance to the
neighborhood and we would be the ones to suffer.
Again, I am very much AGAINST allowing this kennel or increase in
dog population in our neighborhood.
Very truly yours,•
aith L.•Lengwenus
6809 Sard St.
Alta Loma, California
987 -9347 or 988-1324
dune S. 1982
Rancho Cucamonga planning Commi
0,340 Base Road California 91701
Rancho Cucamonga*
Dear Sirs= conditional u =o permit el
the issuance of mezt of a dog
1 oPFo�e issuand development on 1.S5 acres
We strongly The ProPcs the A -1. zone Li_50,
82-09 Whiteheaa- T"le.pr dogs in APN 202 -0, breeding
for raisin 8406 Hamilton Street. and many
of land located at children
environment with small this neighborhood.
This is a reside. I venture is unsuitable for be maintained
dogs. a commer ciatee that sanitarywilldbeiw l w cared for or
_ well noise abate -
There is no guarantee the aVlma.LS ulations and
at the kennels or animal tri permit is issuedpSed
kept quiet' The enforcemenax and once Health hazards p
recourse• would result
meat laws 1s11 have breeding caused
and increse fly excess noise
residents will have little or n Plus
by wasterwater runoff This, values.
if the kennel is wouldelower property
by barking dogs would cause undue -ghbor
peril" hborh000d.
We feel approval andtprovide no benefits nd request of
allo++ing this kennel ause permit.
on the r sidoopposan P- the conditional
We s „rom y deny
planning Commission
Sine' -'ley,
a b
d`.
Ronald D Kapper
Nadine S Kapper
6839 Sard street
ornia 91701
Alta Loma.
.1
Y'•
tGvvv_
In sigaing the following,
- • • • •
•
•
'•h
WHITEHEAD -the proposed
development of a
dog-kennel for raising
and
breeding dogs in
8406 Hamilton Street
• r 1.85 acies
- AP11-202-02-1-50.
of land located
at
Name-
•
je
- -
i
i
�•.�i.
��
i i
_
:
h
r Ir
ri irr '7.i'r
E
94
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 9, 1982
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Shintu Bose, Associate Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Vacation of 22nd Street at Center Str
11
Mr. Stephen Lucas of Lucas Land Company is requesting the City to vacate
the portion of 22nd Street right -of -way, east of Center and the connecting
alleyway. This request is made on behalf of the owners of the property
contiguous to the north of the subject street.
22nd Street right -of -way is a 40' wide 145' long dedication, the east end
of which is connected to 8th Street through an alleyway (20' wide). No
improvement exists on 22nd Street nor on the alley.
Two existing residential structures at the corner of Center and 8th Street
have side street frontage. The two contiguous parcels on the south and
the east of 22nd Street and the alleyway are large industrial lots with
an industrial building on one. Both of these lots are under the same owner-
ship. Thy subject street presently is not a part of any circulation system,
and the present alignment is not suitable for orderly deveiapment of the
adjacent areas.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that Commission consider the implications of vacating
the street and should the Commission approve the vacation., make a recommenda-
tion to City Council for conduct of a public hearing according to law.
LBN:
Attachments
ITEM A
I L_
1
r I
�. tT
J r
HIM,
I
z^ 1 2s! S
o �
r-
?� PROJECT
STF 1
I , °� � ►W
I � <
'rY OF RANCHO C(CA0VIONGA title;
ENGINEERING DIVISION T 169i
VICINITY MAP 1
page
- F HUMSOLT
Q � _
0
- — -- ` z(H:,'MBOLT) 8th
his 12 �° '�...._ar•.^CY ��'+.L::y:a:.r =3G3 - ,r
_ O I = Lz5 Ac WL
—k6)�
P I
I /
5 6� 1 -.
24� MAP 804 -36 - 2F -..�
rY OF RANCHO Ci1CAiIO �-
NGA title;
ENC;INEERING DIVISION --��
VICINITY MAP N
page
PAR_HO- /S II
I
i .
ti.t
C3
l
Red border outlines pruposed lot
2 Ct`• `- ...2
..
a
C
I
Slue border indicates parcels
F
22nd:
ST,
owned by Scheu's and /or Lucas
j
_ -' • /' fir' .
: �J
s
i
rY OF RANCHO Ci1CAiIO �-
NGA title;
ENC;INEERING DIVISION --��
VICINITY MAP N
page
11
11
11
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: Jane 9, 1982
T0, Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
8Y: Arlene Troup, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: AI nSEFi�t AL PSSEa nVo'm lot Rs all subdivision
of ten acres o land into 15 lots located in the
R -1- 20,000 (Single Family Residential /20,000 square foot
lot d um) zone on the A southwest corner r of Hillside
Road an
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: This application is for a custom lots resi-
dential subdivision in the Alta Loma area north of Chaffey College. The
r
site is currently vacant
with an aPP
nt and void of anoximate�10% slope rto the south.
The land is relatively
The parcel is zoned for single family use with a mini lot size of
20,000 square feet, as is all the surrounding land. The General Plan
designation is Very Low Residential (2 dwelling units per acre or less).
ANALYSIS: This drainage
meeting .
of the site, as well as the Proposed stree some, al tern ativestthattmighL confguration. it was requested that the Applicant propose
mitigate both the drainage and the street pattern concerns. The hearing
was continued to May 26, 1982, and
hrubsequeitle to June
nat ves9to thehori9inal
Appiicant has, in fact, prepared
submittal. After reviewing the alternatives, the Engineering Division as
stated that the original submittal is the best alternative decrease far as drain -
ageidsbyJate7east oneradditionalolot. Al lot nwas vdeleteddearlier ntthelot
review process in order to enable the dedication of the Coimm;nity Trail
along Haven Avenue. The following is an outline of the pros and cons
of each alternative, including the original proposal.
ITEM B
Tentative Tract 10245 /Alkhasen -Assad
Planning Commission Agenda
June 9, 1982
Page 2
ALTERNATIVE 1: (Exhibit A)
Pros: o Provides a curvilinear street pat-tarn.
Cons: o Increases severity of drainage problems.
o Decreases lot yield by at least one lot.
ALTERNATIVE 2: (Exhibit B)
Pros: o Slows traffic speed substantially.
o Provides a break in length of the street.
Cons: o Creates a more disjointed neighborhood with several odd sized
and shaped lots.
o Does not improve drainage situation.
o Decreases lot yield by at least two lots.
o Creates a new drainage problem at the new knuckle.
ALTERNATIVE 3: (Exhibit C)
Pros: o Provides a curvilinear street pattern.
Cons: o Does not improve drainage situation.
o Creates several abnormally deep lots.
o Decreases lot yield by at least two lots.
ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL: (Exhibit D)
Pros: o Is best designed for facilitating method of handling drainage.
o Creates a good sense of neighborhood.
• All lots are relatively uniform in size and shape.
Cons: o Creates a straight through street. (However, as it is only
approximately 700 feet long, it is unlikely that it would
promote an increase in traffic speed. Also, none of tte
surrounding blocks have curviliniear streets.)
DRAINAGE: The Engineering Division has studied the drainage considerations of
each alternative in detail and has discussed them in a memorandum, which is
attached for your review.
Tentative Tract 10246 /Alkhaseh -Assed
® Planning Conrnission Agenda
June 9, 1982
Page 2
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all
elements of tTTe project and all input on the project. If, after such consider-
ation, the Commission can support the facts for findings and recommended Con-
ditions of Approval, then adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance
of a Ne gative Declaration would be in order.
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Alternative 1
Exhibit "8" - Alternative 2
Exhibit "C" - Alternative 3
Exhibit "D" - Original Proposal
Staff Report of May 12, 1982
11
` .�LTc(zGSb T1VE _
HILLSIDE i
_ 1
I�
� I
tD /- u / -o30
r —�
i
L — �
/-&V6
I
_-J
0
PROJECT
• l
S[Tl
n�
i ro�sii,p,.s
i
r --1
zo. - -JW(-
�
L- -J
I
w j
! —_- .
cb /- 9f /_Ctp9
L _
-�
aoi- sw -aas
�
i
I`
i
1
r --1
zo. - -JW(-
�
L- -J
I
w j
! —_- .
cb /- 9f /_Ctp9
L _
-�
aoi- sw -aas
�
i
Z
LU
Q
I
i
,
i
i
i
NKRTH
CITY OF rrE*1- A W fMVV%ft5,ek%l
RAINCHO CCCATMONL G1 -mu, A� nQ�s- ��Q
PLANNLNG DW SION E}CHI13iT° SCALE: 4UAud,ed -_
HILLSIDE
r —�
r —�
® i L-
3 i to / -r40r/
xi -a�a
V
fo�
a�0 /3
z•O/- 1w.0,V
J
I �
/ L_J
TAE it
.. T
PRO
����'
1
�-fflE
1 -
r —�
w
c
:z
z+oi f.v -oi�
L _ �
n�
co'
wI
r —1 m
20 / -yWd /2 � 1
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCATMO\'GA
PLANNII`G D?VLSION
L —J
i
i I
i ZO/- sw -cLo
L --j
t m /•sw -��
WOR
I
MISS
kLSiDE
_.J
roi- ur -c.�o
Q
s
3
S
(,
It 1 Iv
ID
i
O
0
0
a., -ate
eor_ 2W-Ois
r --1
20/- O /O'
I 50,.7f / -qpo
i W.•
�
>•F�
r 20/� 9/ /-Of?
J
J
Q!
<
70/ -O/.9 1::: I 2:✓- 9•»' -Gi(i
2DI- S+'i•O /� '
!
' I\'ORTFi
CITY Or
rr��t -•
����1 � «,..t x»46
RANCHO CL)CA1tiZO\ -GA
FL ANNINC L?IVISIQN
EY}ilmT. C scALE- r?x.IAu@ d
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 9, 1982
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Shintu Bose, Associate Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Drainage System for Tract 10246
The natural drainage of the area within the subject project presently flows
southerly and easterly along the wail at the south tract boundary. This runoff
eventually flows to the intersection of Mayberry and Wilson, adding water to the
already undesirable situation of ponding at that intersection.
All the alternate designs of the map as presented have incorporated the design
feature that will reduce the runoff to a certain degree going '.o that intersection
the original submittal being the least contributor of runoff. The developer is
also proposing to install a storm drainage system conveying the runoff from the
proposed street to Haven Avenue. The location and alignment of the pipe will be
determined later on in consultation with some affected property owners. One
alternate alignment will be along the southerly tract boundary. The other alter-
nate will be through an existing developed lot at the southeast corner of Mesada
and Poplar Streets. The ni -ond alterantive is more preferable provided the
necessary easement can be ac4lired from the existing homeowner.
At the intersection of Haven and Wilson, the developer has agreed to construct
the missing portion of the concrete gutter for proper drainage of runoff across
Wilson Street.
It is our opinion that the drainage improvements as mentioned above will q1itigate
any adverse drainage impact to surrounding areas due to this development.
Two conditions of approval should be added to the resolution of approval for
the Commission's consideration in order to adequately address the drainage
considerations, as follows:
a. Installation of a stop drain system to intercept and drain all runoff from
the tract to Haven Avenue, shall be required prior to recordation of the map.
b. The missing 6' wide concrete gutter across Wilson at Haven Avenue shall be
constructed for proper drainage of the intersection.
Respectfully submitted,
Shintu Bose
Associate Civil Engineer
0 1 SB:bc
E
Y
I
1
m1
Y
I
I I
L -J
—.1
i
r —�
L_J
'1
i
I I
JSTREET
--
I
i_J I 7
l_J
CI
I
1
I—
+Lj
—1
J
P�p. PPoP}(tl�
I
RANCHO
r�
__
STREET
-
1 , L_
L -J
I
1
I
1
m1
Y
I
I I
L -J
—.1
i
r —�
L_J
'1
i
I I
f r r
� —_
I
I
\ \Alit.
_ irr .z
OF RANCHO
JSTREET
--
I
i_J I 7
l_J
CI
I
+Lj
—1
P�p. PPoP}(tl�
I
L_J
f r r
� —_
I
I
\ \Alit.
_ irr .z
OF RANCHO
ENGINEERING DIVISION
DRA!NAGE MAP
• —ter, GuTTC4 Cb v,T,
title;
A ma-
page
I _ J
L —!
JSTREET
--
+Lj
P�p. PPoP}(tl�
ENGINEERING DIVISION
DRA!NAGE MAP
• —ter, GuTTC4 Cb v,T,
title;
A ma-
page
I _ J
L —!
RESOLUTION N0.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY
APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 10246
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 10246, hereinafter "Map"
submitted by Luther Alkhaseh, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing
the real property situated 'in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of
San Bernardino, State of California, described as the southwest corner
of Hillside Road and Haven Avenue being ten (10) acres in size into 16
lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing
and action on May 12, 1982; and
WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommet,X approval of the Map
subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning
Divisions reports; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the
Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other
evidence presented at the public hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga does resolve as follows:
® SECTION 1. The Planning Commission makes the following findings
in regard to Tentative Tract No. 10246 and the Map thereof:
(a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable
interim and proposed general and specific plans;
(u) I'm design or improvements of the tentative tract is
consistent with all applicable interim and proposed
general and specific plans;
(c) The site is physically suitable for the type of de-
veiopment proposed;
(d) The design of the subdivision is not iikely to cause
substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury
to humans and wildlife or their habitat;
(e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious
public health problems;
(f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict
with any easement acquired by the public at large, now
of record, for access through or use of the property
within the proposed subdivision.
ii
Resolution No.
Page 2
(g; That this project will not create adverse impacts
on the environment and a Negative Declaration is
issued.
SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 10246, a copy of which is
attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following
conditions and the attached Standard Conditions:
PLANNING DIVISION
1. Lots 10 -15 shall have gated Equestrian access to the
Community Trail along Haven Avenue.
2. The corner lot radius on lot 15 shall be 24'.
3. The recorded feeder trail easements are to include 15'
corner cut -offs at all intersections of trails.
4. The street trees along Haven Avenue are to be planted
in the 6' wide parkway between the Community Trail
and the curb line.
5. The recorded CC8R's for the tract should include a
provision to require that any walls to be constructed
along Haven are to be of uniform design and materials.
6. The rear lot lines of lots 10 -15 shall be planted with
evergreen trees, and properly irrigated in conjunction
with the construction of the Community Trail. The
trees shall be a minimum of 5- gallon in size. Larger
trees may be required, depending on spacing. The
detailed landscaping plans for the tract shall include
this rear yard area and shall be approved by the Planning
Division prior to the approval and recordation of the
final map.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
7. That portion of the block wall, along the north boundary
of Tract 9430, existing in Mesada Street is to be removed.
8. The developer shall improve the drainage ditch west of
the proposed tract, upon gaining the cooperation of the
property owners of the ditch.
9. Modification of the drainage structures and locations
will be required in order to provide the following:
(a) Equestrian trail structures located on the
up -hill side of the easements.
11
13
Resolution No.
Page 3
(b) Provisions to transfer water from the up-
hill side to the downhill side where
necessary.
(c, Provision for an energy dissipator at the
vicinity of the southwest corner of the property.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 1982.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF 111 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Jeffrey King, Chairman
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Planning Commission
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held oa the 9th day of June, 1982, by the following vote -to-
wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
11
�1
q
yCV q
'
u
^`Nrr
C
~_
Z
C
C
✓
C�r�N
C
a�0
v 4
�
J
r
✓
-
r V O
C C r�
.-i
^. o
� c
a
c
J
-� f Lq
Y ✓'
c^ q
°
o
- L
! + cr^• .N.
a
4
`L`•°
S! r✓
.O
7
WJ
n
O l
✓
�
q
`
^
^✓ L
- a V C•
V
L
d 4
Y
V
G+
O
°
C
9 9
c U
C'
N
I
O
�
q
{. .e
w
�✓ �.e r
�
, q
C L
t 0
G ••r O�
r^
C N
•V L
�J
�
-
M V L
AS-CV
t q✓ L
L
C
Q
OL
V 4 C C
aV Fr
C P
•i
L {�
-
_r
c
O•
a
.`•
V
a
T
=
vC+
u-
M
° •JV
"- •gin'
n
NO
c
aL.
L
c .. n
_
a
c'-
u
i
?.
_ -c
O
q
�
_�
��r ✓.
O V
1 ••
C
q
e Ncc
�
�:. {Y'.
� r
C L
_
N
.Oi V
L u
u
G L Mr 4
V
C�
l V L
r P G°
N
4
�`
r�
✓.�
•N•
d
a
V
V O
L
i
L✓. +.+vm
r
q�9gry�
F
c
o
sJe.�
-. •i.
'
Ulu
...
V
-•
✓�
=
�
LN � �
�•N
c1d-
•.O
...
Ncc
r
.L
�
L
NdCO
•JC
pun
d
VTV
JRG ���
L•Cd,
'V
rr
r
t
V l
N o y
�
N
N
�
C= d N O
F ✓.N
O C
q^ N.^
j
•• u
•..•
u.
�
a
N
r
n+°
i-.- Ey...r
G
:�
-:
A
�r %✓: v
�s
>✓
Y
�
r
_Y
_rd:
°ao
o�.0 -..°.
.L.Y
ago
o'a
o
°
ad
c✓. 2•�y.
q
r
a
cL
?
r i
r
c
+ °J.°. �
O
w i
r
�
' O
�` C L [.
9^
k
[-.L
-• a
J
T
W O
r
✓ E
C
s L
i La
j
•l0
Y_
c i
c
�
F•
uYdo
r
Y a
i
L
.rO
=^
�
La
OW _C
V
i_C
V...=
�GVn
C
N
N�
N^
•^
y•L•L OL
A
+i
V Nr
a u
C=
N
i
c l
w
0
i
k 0
a
4
q=
AV
C V
L
.`
a 0
• S
y✓
C
==
q
.O
+C
60
OQ
q
OC
�Ntl
V�
V✓LV6a
O
HOC
>211��
qC
L
'N
r
Nr
9{rC
Cpq
°4y`Vp
LP
V
=J
w NV
CC{SPq
6
v`
q
•p
��
Vr
a'
O�
�P
L✓ C O N
L✓
V V
Ju
u �°•
i,� C
^C
.Li.
6_
VO
4V
.Jir
r
P�•+a r
LCU .qt
•Or
N
d0
aJ.r iJ.j
n .'
qV
J
C C
L
.a0
N
V
V
^ i
r
N
W
`✓
r
Y
a T N
.m
i
c Y
oL•
_>
ry
aE
�^
s
_L
°' iS°
°r °°..i.
nn
��•p'
n�
c•Y^
V
zl
a ✓o.
.Y..y R ��
Y.L.
..
9 Y -
_
Tk
Y D
V r •�
C I
P .Lr.
n q
a.
l C
C
N �
C
V V
g V
�
u y
�°
V N
Y T v
•n
L
C
V Z•
+ 2
V q
V
a
q •..
u
•��
°
Y
�J
n
•+ V
ov
°
O d l
Y.nd v
C C
o
q+ n V+
✓
Nd•yE
v uk 4
r q
P
o
s
a e
v«
a�e
L
rN
r
v
n.n
u
ro
Y
ono Nz
V..i_ _
..o
Nu
:y
.L. ✓°r ✓a
N•N•�ad ✓o
y
._�
-L
v1
•..�
L
Cr
.ri.v
c.co
v°.o
H
C.°r.
Zc t" �I
u�
�w�m��
.L..W
;F�
r�°•��
Yu�uc`.nL{
c°
LYGr
>�
nA
s}
_
_
_J
_
O
�.
.�•.Jj1
f
•
i0
�•
I}
V
J
V
°V
r
TO LqC
C
9
CV
r
y
•�•O
n
`J
v
r
C
>
y
L '+
V
Y
�
C
M �
n C
C
-V .Jir
]��.
L d
V�
•-.
O
y
w
J
v
V
OM �
C
i0
9N •-`
u
-V
n
q1N
m�
✓ r�
c q«
Y °mc
-
n
Lve.
•CW
C +G CL�
N4
+
OL
d
CL ��
+ 9
V
C
�V Vn
L O
qr-
4��
T
3
O
6
q C
N p
C
6 V N
C
V
C
d>•
Y^
V P
l^
C'• l
C6
J !
VN Jr
r
q+
V
pr
yq
C
O
N•d`�
L
iY
pN CY.O
�q
pN CJ
a
p
O.`
aO
g�V
�O `pnY
qN
qCC ✓r
CtV
zz
^•J r ✓•�
q'
Y
dN� �°
iC
\.9
w+ 9efi
r
Vr
V
�C
=
NQ yT
C+ H
✓r
N V
VJq
C
�{
V
✓ q r d-i V
°
Y
N
M
N ✓ 4
V
= j
> C
V P
L C
•+
O
Y r
�
•�
C
6 I
N
G'
6•'
�
n L 4
Y
=
(�
9
S�
C V
=
Y
V P A N
q C
.�
E
•rJ• �
O. q P O
V
O✓
I� V
L
n
c
w
P✓ u
� M
✓ c N u
T q L
u O
L
= 0 a� i
Y
q V
r$ O
09
Y
9
V
C 2 r O C
r L
qn
a q q
9_ V
d
r C
O
qtJ
�N
�6 qw
L
�.
n V°
q`
CT
•V•
- O� V
C
TY
•9
9
°
Y
Y}
q
'^ w q N
= V
V L L
C> >.
r
•Ln V✓ �•
E F'
i✓
C
r 4.
C
CO
Nq -5.
sa
L SCV
y
nV
6u
fi>
Cr
��
4v.V ✓
CVC
12:
•L.rOi
LM
N 6
C
C O
C
V
w
N L C G
r
V
L •.. �
q P q
C
w.✓
�r
r _ C`
r
q
nJl
-
O Y
O C
D+ J
j
•L.r C O
M
i Y
L
qaM
ni q
+d
r q
O
V
r
M
.-i•
✓GM
NC
Nr
O
Np
:9.5
y0y�
L
��n
JV��
C�� �tG.L'
G ✓V•
•L`✓C
-V
{ii
q
�_
n
✓
u •.. L �- L
C V
�✓
.� q
n O P Orn
d� � O
n
q q••
Y
J
qC
LaJ
>+ >S�O
Vq
VV p
q�
yC'n
LC1
Y
J
CI
L
^qC
N
O`
MV^ FL
LL✓
PN
LV •
• •i
A
M
J
V
�
y••
L^ m. pE
NO
_
= LLe
q S C'>
Y a
".
q
+�
O t
C.L•�
�
�
i
Cq
rt
�^
4yV
�
t7..
N�
Y'Or
.Jw
6✓•
••.
V
^I
^I
yp
�
�
I
^�
� XI
I
I
�
�
•I
I
.•{ •
N
J
J
i
I
{
�1
�~•- = a «v � c n r c ;�, I r i Lo o? c L e
Y G O� . L I � .•• f .Jn S v _ r I _ •I V y « Y � .�.0 �«
lu 7;=
7 5 22 _ 4 r Gr- M C✓ y r q Q r O�•V.• CLC q
U ° `_ G9 r � Od NV VOA � L•
2 .Vi• u q 9 _ C 9 9 l 4 � •IL r l N r C .r
O S n q I O r O •-' V v o I L V - 11r ` S Z G T O
� C_ 4 N a v ' C� 1 q � � �' y r �� i � S L C D q✓
Y V y J._ 3 .Vi N _ �� y. � O. O 9 r_ M•" [ V n C
O
=r- !..-dl � a �° � '° � °`•°, -ate
�a L vyoo Y i L
p �
l�rC r �.[_. _Pn L. dN d d •.G - •°.•> r IrN Iy .) -•�J Lr�LV4
�9L ° rLC Ldp r r L 6C`� lVL C I'J4 NO V�Orp
e• 9 r ` T N C J
_ I=
dDC .Vi 90 06C Pjr 2 ` d d0 � ^4_ �Cr N �r`N -, •.9£° 4
V_y °« G qY CV c « E =° 4.1 ° iS [ V' / pya _t G b G r a•. .Nr�4�.n f.
nzc
ML .v a y 4 •-0 34w r,. ° _— =,Cr'` °..
Fcc
r o
� O � � ~ � .n O O..J � ✓ L � •� 9 n
N _
X�
W
_ G
_ o
v �
� U V—• 9 C L n G N ', _� L �. � N O T � C V C V O >•
C= Oq a q_VV S ___O
� _ � •.
_4 N q ON6 p�• —•• =V� =C� q- P Lr GOrJUVC - � E
T A V L V S V �Vgf.6 _.O r P= � -�� i•., a.�
4 qS L 4 '•.O VN•t..
xL <gOGVV V^ VO
O ••. r r
N d� T D NV ° Y� V d6r0 O'�b Os rC Cr �M •O.L Pr
^Nic L v•£9� aLN :�
C� u V O y �� L _O C S C y N y C .�.• V i i O C L M .r.. _ V w
C C 4 D � J(oen ¢ Lgrr Ld •rL ' ^� 4LO0 t0� 4V
'o
° -°' « -` "q. °L•_ usury " - 4L ror
r C N C ` r 9 ._j C O L j •q C G C
L _9L D J V4 rt.s �O b�F>. Vqr rO �LGy CCV .V••E.°i NO
2 ? r 7 n r L G L —0- Y q 1 9 4 9 j r> C r C C N V
M 3 O 9 < y. y W C s O r� 9 t O m> .N.• _ u M O A d w a' V � �_ C u � _ Y r_ 9 a
d� � D P C= V _ t r r i L r L0 u' V [L•• 4 C� r° q V L 9 C
•. C � 9 � r L b n d U i y L 6 V i q _O CY v O __ r 9 9 u ' r te
at QO br
G 6
-2 _OV L OC °i r'S L �CC
7 4
2 �. N Vr OOM V� r_49d FaLK �� NO VV � C _O C�
• ^J V a L 9N LrC ... _> 4 rOC Cb__Y y= tU 4Du 0< =OiV ear V4
w y C
N
« L+ w __ fa •. M Cf _ _ i � E— o .—,c r L r AVf i
« «°
°iP
2 .••.VL � � OS w99G g ��D e.O�q d � VO ?y G�C'_4.r�C V «Jr
O C �� �y � T N O � w 4 � A S i�^ O y p6� S w� D •- l w C S 9� q « q C w D
'• i V•f� 4 7 w [..•V� �4�� �y PC4C «4 r^ CD_ C_ OI CLy��VL SG� G4
ti- r. y�Y •_ W l•LL y4 •L. _ OL YGgW C =0 �O .y. _D�a4Y CN `
~yam �C «O <'J V4V Pr•0..0 NeV« <NO• 60 <C>CN «Y�OL <r'O4 rrC
mI
1 I
N
(W
n
u
.o
P
e
c
N
b
r
L
n
cc
qa -
4 D e
�
_•.-n
C_r
� O
C w• �
- q
O
C
r
'✓
C
V
•_•• C G
r
q _•
r
^•n ^ L y
�^ i V P
r,
- c
V
C
3 L G'
�-
r •°r
y
q✓
L ^l
L
r
O
T =C CC
V
, Z
f 1
11 V
Cr t
r v
�M
`crue
� f
- �
LL C
S
��
G C
V
•� P
y l
V S• > J P
�
N u_ N
Vac•:
•
ocr
u�cC°
�°
°r
s +rte
G O O
Lp0
YUnC•.•
`r`
44%
v^
G
>
o..+
o
a•G�r
°
F a
°Lo
cab
u•.
i�
-'o
r -c
c
r
l
C
+•NA
N
�-
DV
°•AE
r Q•
VVN�
�`•N Ctr
Nr
q N
>
OO
QV
� aOV
^NN
- -LA�Dw
NOLairC
OHO
�V`
u--L
coF
..•_PV -q
Nor•
c
ora�o
¢.n oa L•�a
nr
WQ.r
.rOrV�
Ni
pa0
"O`
E s
sae i
i w
w4a°.
L
WI V
V' L
L V V
V V
V V
V N
Na L
pC Pu
N O
O
r C
�' I
U G V �
<
e
N
<
r V +�•
Q
aM
j 4
4 -4y
��
XI
X�
Xf
vLl
d
4 u
c L c r u
4 r <
NZ
4- E
ZZ
E r u r -
c��t =- Amy
V-
O
-•. L � q
q q `Z L
Ca40 G�✓•rq
4 •_
�O 4N Y.GC�C
O r •J U N C V
•^�acV.. r o!E
C r � V V -
i c -;8 c o�nDa au
q.nu-C
_. N L
rL0 Oa
r� Y V Q 0 •dn C N
p'buN po
C SGi
XI
nq
C -r
c _ 4
- � O
3 c•'�
•^ _C L w
3 Sr
=oo�
M ^ V
p
V�q
V Uy V
-G
a P 1G
o = N d
-z r•'
u
O � P
co G
4- a
O °CAN
i iNs'
a C
- O
L q C N
N a - c
O n V
G q V q
q o�•N�.
N G 0=
1
0
- O C
aC�
°•+ON
V PLL
G N a V
w
C 9
O_+Oq
dy G1
> e o
a d
q rr°C
i a
�D
N G L r
A o
p
..r 7
NGC
e
q a
O L p N
c` -
N r-
's= �a
D
C q O•w
0
aLa
„v G
r
cz
XI
u
b
W
V
s
a
r
O�
Nf
r
ml
ti
`u
r
J
S
h ••
N
O
J
L, Q
L O
S v
o�-C
� q w
VaN
nv�
O d r
€W b
r°.qr
3°q
9 q V
� b
V C
N P "
4� b
A 2] •G°a
LGo
`E Lo
O a
2- q
^� N
F 4 O
OV O V
V b .
q q
=•JV 6
N '
=yn
S y >
e Es`o
G -
O r -
I q` V
�OqO
0
J,I XI
W
u P
P
c
n
�
qa -
4 D e
�
_•.-n
C_r
� O
C w• �
- q
O
C
q _•
r
^•n ^ L y
�^ i V P
r,
- c
C
3 L G'
�-
r •°r
y
q✓
L ^l
L
r
O
T =C CC
V
, Z
f 1
11 V
Cr t
r v
�M
`crue
� f
V
LL C
C•
��
•J
°m C
•.
V S• > J P
�
N u_ N
Vac•:
•
ocr
u�cC°
�°
°r
s +rte
G O O
Lp0
YUnC•.•
`r`
44%
o..+
o
a•G�r
°
F a
°•AE
r Q•
Va
�`•N Ctr
°
6 �
OO
QV
� aOV
^NN
- -LA�Dw
NOLairC
OHO
�V`
u--L
coF
..•_PV -q
Nor•
c
ora�o
¢.n oa L•�a
WQ.r
N� E
a
O
0
- O C
aC�
°•+ON
V PLL
G N a V
w
C 9
O_+Oq
dy G1
> e o
a d
q rr°C
i a
�D
N G L r
A o
p
..r 7
NGC
e
q a
O L p N
c` -
N r-
's= �a
D
C q O•w
0
aLa
„v G
r
cz
XI
u
b
W
V
s
a
r
O�
Nf
r
ml
ti
`u
r
J
S
h ••
N
O
J
L, Q
L O
S v
o�-C
� q w
VaN
nv�
O d r
€W b
r°.qr
3°q
9 q V
� b
V C
N P "
4� b
A 2] •G°a
LGo
`E Lo
O a
2- q
^� N
F 4 O
OV O V
V b .
q q
=•JV 6
N '
=yn
S y >
e Es`o
G -
O r -
I q` V
�OqO
0
J,I XI
W
u P
P
c
LJ-'• c
r,
77 r
t �
f 1
11 V
Cr t
r v
v r
r
� f
V
LL C
v
415 r
N� E
E s
sae i
i w
w4a°.
L
WI V
V' L
L V V
V V
V V
V N
Na L
r C
�' I
y c
u ` T
c
° w
j 4
4 -4y
rV G
GV'Ei
< n
nl O
O i O
Oi r
N•• C
1 .
.
C O
O
CI 0
00 G
GN I
V <
<•L I O
O:O�
Z.2
d >` -rr•r t q � 4G
�Od ^N _ O_• _a
V lC• tt V V _ _ P'N
GL. 9 Pr V G.0 r
VVV LViq� VL TO. E CO
c< iL. •"�N Tr a o oa
VV V VIr rq
C P
qN� we Gc� b c •-
yFO G _L W L Y P a l . O
L. `� a a° .. i oL L w• c i
w d
r O C C g V r O r r G
€ -�• cru c<Li c..or •�
W C y y O q_
GL -.
N - N qE� -
Z •'rqC �d�G O V
- ` l
V L q b r Op
C qr Nr•a -'y
.2 G 4 q "� 4 0 4 O• r i
r C L L.• c
0 oN G�e_g G -`• r —� Nom
V •>nq N -_ -_Ct
v>iLVa.. E�iW alOV�4 4 <� Q�L
N w V r u
2t .—t
V
X I Xf °� •]•G �o� �I
u
V
_c
r
y�
O p
V�
O
p�
c u
CE=
C `
4 �
c
L e
4 °
C
M
� Gy
c
V 4
a
G C
' V v
�1
W�
G
r r
G p
C.5
i V
r
e
_u
>
o v
a
E
5' c
r
N �
C'• C
C C
p V
•- p
r C
C
W w
NI
L
G
t
V
c_
t <Os
q=
� U
V =
q'.
D a
V
v°
N r
�G
q
Lip
C L`
C•
P�
G i
N �
G
u w
AI
M
X I Xf °� •]•G �o� �I
u
V
_c
r
y�
O p
V�
O
p�
c u
CE=
C `
4 �
c
L e
4 °
C
M
� Gy
c
V 4
a
G C
' V v
�1
W�
G
r r
G p
C.5
i V
r
e
_u
>
o v
a
E
5' c
r
N �
C'• C
C C
p V
•- p
r C
C
W w
NI
L
G
t
V
c_
t <Os
q=
� U
V =
q'.
D a
V
v°
N r
�G
q
Lip
C L`
C•
P�
G i
N �
G
u w
AI
M
u
V
_c
r
y�
O p
V�
O
p�
c u
CE=
C `
4 �
c
L e
4 °
C
M
� Gy
c
V 4
a
G C
' V v
�1
W�
G
r r
G p
C.5
i V
r
e
_u
>
o v
a
E
5' c
r
N �
C'• C
C C
p V
•- p
r C
C
W w
NI
L
G
t
V
c_
t <Os
q=
� U
V =
q'.
D a
V
v°
N r
�G
q
Lip
C L`
C•
P�
G i
N �
G
u w
AI
M
to
cr
(V iO
�IF-
e
z
u
c
6
Ln
n
u
y
a
wx
o
�a
• o-
o
>
d
n
L-di
u�
Vim'
G
Z'
�=
y•-�0
Ty
O
�w Y i
j+
�
Y G
I•.
•nCy
S
.�
N N
u G
y
V
Y
G q y
°c
�
i�1;
i
9a�
�LV
�Ew
�
O
NY.
�
-•�
_6n
P
V
t
L
M
1J�
4
V
Uf.'
Ll
V
d�
NC
yUy
d
IP O
d O
C
V
= L C
V
L V
v •-.r O
0 d
L
9 O
Y
r
VV C
n0�
�
�
rO.OiY
•-•
Cy
O��
r
W�r�^J
a0CL
4
JY
-V
T
G Y
nC<
w
C=
V VO
Yr
�+ q L
N
I V G
O V
j C
>
Y x
N L J v
c G
¢ZY
L
E
O
e
L 4.
�NGL
_
�
�
LOzY
G.��J O'
r
O-JY
S_
L
4G
Y
DLO
Np
T��
^O
nR
=VVtl
�OYnV
T —Y
•-i
O 1 O
sO
___CL
N�
V V PN
y
V
i 9 V V
G N°z
7E
dc u
O 6
G L
q
Ln
0
0
El
CrrY OF RANCHO CtiCAIViONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
June 9,
1982
TO:
Members
of the
Planning Commission
FROM:
Lloyd B.
Hubbs,
City Engineer
BY:
Barbara
Krall,
Engineering Technician
SUBJECT:
EnvirormPntal Gcaoccma.
+ n .l
irm
a' wl wa iw 1 - .nurcn JY alter it
Saints - A division of 2.09 acres into 2 parcels - located on thr
Bout west _I corner of Wilson and Haven Avenues in a R -1 -20 Zone
U1 -lul -1
kr j
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION
This parcel map divides 2.09 acres of land into 2 parcels. Parcel #1 con-
taining .89 acres is completely developed including landscaping and a paved
parking lot. The existing building of approximately 4600 square feet is used
by the Church of the Latter Day Saints for seminaries and institutes of
religion.
Parcel #2 containing 1.90 acres is presently vacant. No plans for development
have been submitted, however, the Church has indicated that a company is
interested in purchasing the land for development of a Wedding Chapel.
Existing zoning for the site and surrounding area is R -1- 20,000. The property
to the east is occupied by Chaffey College with vacant property to the west
and south. To the north is an existing single- family subdivision.
The site slopes to the south with a 10% slope on the south portion of Parcel 2.
This slope is fully landscaped with gr.,und cover.
ANALYSIS:
Off -site improvements for Haven and Wilson Avenues for Parcel #2 will be
required at the time of development. This parcel will be subject to further
review by the Manning Commission when development plans are submitted.
Parcel #1 is required to provide an equestrian trail with appropriate land-
scaping on Haven Avenue prior to recordation of the parcel map. This trail
is a part of the Community Equestrian Trail system.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
Also attached for your review and consideration is Part I of the Initial Study
as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial
Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field investigation.
Upon completion and review of the Initial Study and field investigation, Staff
found no significant adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the
proposed subdivision.
continued...
ITEM C
Staff Report - Planning Commission
Re: Parcel Map 7451
June 9, 1982
Page 2
11
FACTS OF FINDING:
This project is consistent with the zoning ordinance and General Plan
designation of residential - low to medium density.
CORRESPONDENCE:
Notices of Public Hearing have been mailed to surrounding property owners
and a notice of public hearing has been placed in the Daily Report newspaper.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input and elements
of the project. If, after such consideration, the Commission can support
the facts for findings and recommended conditions of approval, then adoption
of the attached Resolution would be appropriate.
Respectfully submi ted,
wJ
LBH:BK:bc
Attachments
t
11
Il
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PARCEL MAP NUMBER 7451 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 7451)
LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF WILSON AVENUE AND
HAVEN AVENUE
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 7451, submitted by
Church of Latter Day Saints and consisting of two (2) parcels,
located at the southwest corner of Wilson Avenue and Haven Avenue,
being a division of the East 264 feet of the Northeast quarter of the
Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter, Section 24, Township 1 North,
Range 7 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian., in the County of San
Bernardino, State of California; and
WHEREAS, on March 22, 1982, a form application was submitted
requesting review of the above - described tentative map; and
WHEREAS, on June 9, 1982, the Planning Commission held a duly
advertised public hearing for the above - described map.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made:
1. That the map is consistent with the proposed General
Plan.
2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is
consistent with the proposed General Plan.
3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed
development.
4. That the proposed subdivision and improvement will
not cause substantial environmental damage, public
health problems or have adverse affects on abutting
property.
SECTION 2:
adverse environmental
June 9, 1982.
SECTION 3:
subject to the condit
thereto.
0
That this project will not create significant
impacts and a Negative Declaration is issued on
That Tentative Parcel Map No. 7451 is approved
ions of the City Engineer's Report pertaining
Resolution No.
Page 2
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 1982.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Jeffrey King, Chairman
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Planning Commission
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 9th day of June, 1982, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: 0
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
El
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT
FILED BY: Church of Latter 2ay Saints
LOCATION: Southwest corner of Wilson and Haven
Avenues
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: East 264 feet of the NE i of the
NE i of the NE 3, Section 24, T.1 N., R. 7 W. S.B.M,
TENTATIVE MAP N0. 745_1
DATE FILED: 3/22/82
NUMBER OF LOTS: 2 _
RELEIPT NUMBER: —
FEE: $237.00
County of
San
Bernardino, State of California
ZONE:
R -1 -20
TENTATIVE
MAP
PREPARED BY: McCutchan Co., Inc.
GROSS ACREAGE: 2.09 acres
ADDRESS:
265 N. San Gabriel Blvd.
Pasadena, California 91107
MINIMUM
LOT AREA:
LOT FRONTAGE:
RECORD OWNER(S)
ADDRESS
4 Corp. of the Pres. of the 50 E. North Temple Street
San Bernardino Stake of the Church Salt Lake City, Utah 84150
rf Jesus Christ of L.D.S.
PHONE f
REPORT OF THE CITY ENGINEER
Dedications
1. Dedication by final map of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary
easements as shown on the tentative map.
2. Dedication by final map of the following missing rights -of -way on the following
streets:
additional feet on
additional feet on
additional feet on
'Q-Corner P/L radius required on Haven and Wilson
Other dedicated on Haven
X 3. Rights of vehicular access s�hal P be'_5r(c en-Parcel 11 4=
4. Street vacation required for:
5. Master Plan of Streets revision required for:
6. The following perimeter intersections require realignment as follows: _
RCE 20
TENTATIVE MAP N0. 7451
Page 2
"'1111. IUU
STREET NAME
111 .4114
CURB &
GUTTER
1
1P
Improvements
(Bonding is required prior to Q Recording for Parcel
MEDIANk� OTHER
ISL41,D'1
Haven
M Building permit for
Parcel 2
)
7. Construct
full street improvements (including curb and gutter,
A.C. pavement,
_
sidewalk,
one drive approach per lot, parkway trees and street
lights) on
all
interior
streets.
X 0. Construct
the following :pissing improver..ents on the following
streets:
I
t...l:....
7 �..A «o.,;nn aZ i rrinAtinn nn meter
"'1111. IUU
STREET NAME
111 .4114
CURB &
GUTTER
J..0 vv. Y.... ...
A.C. SIDE-
PVMT. WALK
J
DRIVE
APPR_
STREET
TREES
STREET
LIGHTS
MEDIANk� OTHER
ISL41,D'1
Haven
y
X
,- I son
Ix
x x
x
x
L x
i
I
f
9. Construct al storm drain and drainage structures as shown on the tentative
map, or as rey,:ired by the City Engineer.
X 10. Provide all utW ty services to each lot including sanitary sewers, water,
electric power, gas, telephone and cable televisicn- conduit. All utilities
are to be underground.
X 11. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of
any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary.
X 12. Install appropriate street name signs and traffic control signs with loca-
tions and types approved by the City Engineer.
X 13. Developer is to provide all construction plans for drainage and street im-
proverients. Such plans shall meet approval of the City Engineer.
X 14. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water
District standards. A letter of acceptance is required.
X 15. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern
California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall be decorative
poles with underground service.
15. The following existing streets being torn up by new services will require an
A.C. overlay:
17. The fog lowing speci is dimensi6ns, (i.e., cul-de-sac radius, street section
widths) are not approved:
_ 18. The following existing streets are substandard:
They will require:
Approvals and Fees
19. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval
San Bernardino County Flood Control District.
X 20. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other
ties involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to
that may be received from them.
RCE 20
from CALTRANS/
interested agen-
any requirements
-
TENTATIVE MAP NO. 7451 Page 3
0 21. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows:
A. Caltrans, for:
B. City:
_ C_ County Dust Abatement District:
D. D.I.S. Trenching Permit if any t orhs wereand r�aterdeep:�_
X E. Cucamonga County Water District:
F. Other:
Mai) Control
ntrol
22. If only a portion of this Map is recorded, adjustments shall be made to pro-
- vide for t::o -:•:ay traffic and parking on all affected streets. � th or area
23. The following lots appear to be substandard in either 4-,ontag_` ? , -P
and should be corrected on the final map: ine in accord -
24. All corner lots shall have a corner radius at the right -of -way
ante with the Citv of Rancho Cucamonga standards.
25. A Parcel Map shall be recorded prior to the first phase subdivision to prevent
the creation of an unrecognized parcel located
25. The boundary of the Tentative Map needs c arification as fol
27. The border shall be shown to centerline of existing perimeter streets, or
title explanation required.
Parcel Map 4Jaiver
28, information submitted at the time of application is /_ e, according to
not sufficient
to support the issuance of a waiver of Parcel Map Certificate,
requirements of the State Map Act and local ordinances. ' for
Flood Control {Bonding is required prior to Q Building9permit for
29 subdvision within
FloodInsuranceeProgram. Thisesubdivisiontwillfbe d-
subject to the provisions of that program and Ordinance No. 24.
30 prtyi line may channel
requiredflood
divertesheet runoff to streetstire north pro -
Such flow may be required to go under sidewalks through culverts.
31. If water surface is above top of curb, 30" walls shall be required at the
back of the sidewalk at all downstream curb returns.
_ 32. Culverts required to be constructed across streets a� following locations:_
33. .Broad scale hydrologic studies .�i a require to assess �mpac
increase
runoff.
11
RC=- 20
TENTATIVE MAP NO. 7451 Page 4
Miscellaneous
X 35. Dust abatement will be made a condition of issuance of the grading permit for
this project.
X 36. Poise impact on this project will be mitigated in accordance with the Planning
Division report on subject property.
37. This property is not within the present City Boundary and will require
annexation.
33. Ali information required to be shown on the tentative map is not shown as re-
quired:
X 39. Proper grading and erosion contro , including the preventation of sedimenta-
tion or damage to offsite property shall be provided for as required.
40. A preliminary soils report will not be required for this site for the follow-
ing reasons: A ropy of the soils report furnished to the Building Division
prior to grading will be furnished to the Engineering Division.
X 41. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that
sewer treatment capacity will be availabie at the time building permits are
requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga Ccunty Water
District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will
not be issued unless said certification is received in writing.
X 42. The City Engineer shall make the determination, in accordance with Section
66436(C)(1) of the Subdivision Map Act, that division and development of the
property will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise
of any public entity or public utility right -of -way or easement and the sigra*
ture of any such public entity or public utility may be omitted from the final
map unless the City is notified in writing of any objection to said determina-
tion within the specified time limits of said Section.
X 43. At the time of Final Map submittal, the following shall be submitted: Traverse
calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and/
or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. '
44. Development shall be limited to one drive approach per street. Multiple lots
fronting on a single street shall use common drive approaches at lot lines.
X 45. A community Equestrian Trail shall be provided along Haven Avenue in accordance
with the Equestrian Trail Plan. A detailed equestrian trail plan indicating
widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing and weed control, in
accordance with the City equestrian trail standards, shall be submitted to and
approved by the City Planner prior to approval and recordation of the final map.
Said community trail shall be installed within one year from recordation.
X 46. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan which indicates new landscaping along
the community trail and the existing landscaping to be removed, shall be- submitted
and approved by the Planning Division prior to approval and recordation of the
final map.
X 47. Street trees, a minimum of 701. - 24" box or larger, and the rest 15 gallon size,
shall be installed in accordance with the Master Plan of Street Trees for the
City of Rancho Cucamonga and shall be planted at an average of every 20' on
Haven Avenue. Said street trees shall be installed within one year from
recordation.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LLOYD B. HUBBS
CITY ENGINEER
By:
,IRCE 20
E-
11
CITY OF RANCHO C-JCALMONGA
INITIAL STUDY
PART I - PROJECT IA°FORNiATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant
Enviro:z..ental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00
For all projects requiring environmental rev development
form must be completed and submitted to the
Review Committee through the department where the
app ication is made. upon receipt of tills
pro;ec re-
application, the Env'rcnmental Analysis staff will prepare
Part II of the Initial Stu(!v. ?he Development Review later than ten
Cc.,unittee will meet and ta;ce action ac which t me the
(10) days before the public meeting
project is to be heard. T ^° Co-rnitteew�::lilhaveeno one
significant
'three deter- minations: 1) be project
environmental i-eDact and a Negative Declaration will be
filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact
and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepatvd, or 3) An
additional information report should be supplied by the applicant
-
giving further information concerning the pronosed project.
PROJECT TITLE: _ parcel m3v No. 7451
"P -S NAME• ADDRESS, TELEPHONE:
Corporation of the
APPLICr'
Bernardino Stake of S re Church
Lake City. 9415
of Latter Da Saints, -SO E. North Temple
NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED Inc.
CONCERtiING THIS PROJECT: Floyd Zielke at 4cCutchan Company,
THIS
265 N. San Gabriel Blvd., P3sana, Yhone
IIJCATIO13 OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS Am ASSESSOR PARCEL NO )_
201-181 -
LIST OTHER PERidITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE ATM
FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS:
no other know ermits are re uired
I -1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
0
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Parcel map for division of proposed land into
2 parcels to facilitate sale of parcel 2 which is surplus nronerty and
ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND
PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANZY: Prajcct area 2.119 AC.
existing building area 4600 Sq. FL.
DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETT=NG OF THE PROJECT SITE
INCLUDING INFOR,%1ATION ON TOPOG ?API;', PLANTS (TR ES) ,
ANIMALS, AMC CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCErTiC ASPECTS, USE
OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY
EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS;:
The project site slopes from North to South at approximately 82 The
northerly 300 feet of the site is vacant and has a growth of native
brush and grass. The southerly 300 feet of the site has been landscaped
with grass, shrubs and trees and there is an existing building
_approximately 81' X 57' together with paved parking, conc. walks an
other miscellaneous improvements on this portion of the site. The
Latter
nor any particular cultural historical or scenic aspects were found
at, or discovered about the site. The p.oper *_y to the east is occupied
to the north is
Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series -
of cumulative actions, which although individually shall,
may as a whole have significant environmental impact?
w
I -Q
y _
WILL THTS PROJECT:
® YES NO
_ X 1. Create a sv.stantial change in ground
contours?
_ X 2. Create a s,�Dstantial change in existing
noise or vi oration?
X 3. Create a s•.bstantial change in demand fo!
nranicipal :ervices (police. fire, water,
sewage, et+:.)?
X 4. Create cha:tges in the existing zoning or
general plin designations?
k 5.- Remove and existing trees? How many ?_
_IL_ 6. Create the need for use or disposal of
potential :y hazardous materials such 's
toxic subztances, flammables or explosives?
Explanation of any YES answers above:
IM'>3RT7--1U -. If the project: involves the construction o:
residential tuiits, complete the form on the
next page.
CERTIFICATIGN: I hereby certi�y that the statements f,rn. -hec�
above and in the attached exhibits present the data an(
information required for this initial evalua' ion to thi
best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, any
information presented are true and correct to the best of
my kncwledge and belief- I further understand that
additional infcrmation may be required to be submitted
before an a6equa'Ce evaulat ion can be made by the Develc i meat
Review Committee. McCutchan Co., Inc.
Date March 16. I982 _ Signature
Jerry Tutt
Title _ President
FtESIDtZ7 ^Ii,I, CO`:ST UCI;ON
The follo:7ir.g information should be p y rovided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planninc Div:szon in order to aid in assessing the abilit of the
school district to accom:uodate the proposed residential development.
Nave of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Tentative parcel map-No. 7451
Specific Lscation of Project: S.W. corner of Wilson and Haven Avenue
wen venue
single
f a*11�I ....._t5:
G. s�.•.7r e r
of = i c
familly units:
3. Date pro?csed to
beg:_. C nS trL'CtiCL.
4. earliest
Modal
pad - of Tentative
5. 'r'2,3:,cC -s Price Rance
nE
PHASE
I P-AS?
d
P H A S %--' 3 PF' �
'r=s" TOTAL
None proposed
with
this
parcel nap
None proposed with t_iis parcel nap
'r — 4
0-
1
i
1
i
1
I I
1�
C
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 7451
IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
• THE EAST U4 FEET OF THE NORTIE.AST V4 OF THE MOaTEAST V1 OF TtIF NOSITIEAST V4,
SECTION 26. U1L,RT w.. SB.M. M THE cas..r . uwraa -EOM By '� SURRVVEYOR GE !NE AL
ACCORDING TO TPE OFFICIAL PLAT OF SAID LMDtT PORTION MiTHIN HAVZ" "ENUE
JOIA'7 Wn_SSON 2 n .SRO Tf!£RTi7lDY
DATE-. MARCH 4,1982
TRACT NO. 9582 -1
M5 138177 - 80
TRAC i 1 \10.9 30 MB 339/57-68 _„ �, 0 MAP MB 139/77 -00 FAMILY
1m
�• � .- � ! / _w. 3-a.
OWNER- SUBD!`/tDER
CORP OF TNC PRIES OF THE SAP! BUINA.O1
Ox
NORTH C µ� OFJESLJ3 CHRIST OF LS
J
S E
SALT LAKE TRY, UTAH 64150
P-KWE 213-577 -0115
ENTNEEIR
MCCUTCHAN CO. Nc
MS�A. C�9l10HLVO
PHONE: Q3 `95.5162
�
NOTES:
j.0
C w,,LrlaN CA P1A7wa
EROPOZEO 8v THE **ws-
y
;
WOER " .......10,
PORE[- YY
2 >LL lM.HI"11EYENTT
<
� I
U)
w �
A T
PRyOSEO .T wS TPL
W
o
Z
1
J
>wr>s- tac..w<P
2
� >
s>a...•s.i- �s.>a..s m cc
W
N 4
K
t
V<
i
i <f
1
3—r
Z
f
BENCH MARK
ELEY WTS C-Z 0 Rv SOUTH
CUA• PET- SE CrR HavEK nNO
RyZOODO V A C A N T
dal
.M 1
OWNER- SUBD!`/tDER
CORP OF TNC PRIES OF THE SAP! BUINA.O1
Ox
NORTH C µ� OFJESLJ3 CHRIST OF LS
J
S E
SALT LAKE TRY, UTAH 64150
P-KWE 213-577 -0115
ENTNEEIR
MCCUTCHAN CO. Nc
MS�A. C�9l10HLVO
PHONE: Q3 `95.5162
�
EX-,S-..g C0kTVLPS
ELSTr CRC S'L'XK auu
---� EMT. • P00005E7 PMOPERTT LRIEl
- -- CtRTt4�4
c.�T ELSTP4 TmE 4
NOTES:
j.0
C w,,LrlaN CA P1A7wa
EROPOZEO 8v THE **ws-
y
;
WOER " .......10,
PORE[- YY
2 >LL lM.HI"11EYENTT
[xTSrnro >. Y LLTERAT'OKS »E
w �
A T
PRyOSEO .T wS TPL
W
Z
) {.TIl1TV COYP>NIES
J
>wr>s- tac..w<P
2
� >
s>a...•s.i- �s.>a..s m cc
W
N 4
K
t
V<
1
Z
f
BENCH MARK
ELEY WTS C-Z 0 Rv SOUTH
CUA• PET- SE CrR HavEK nNO
EX-,S-..g C0kTVLPS
ELSTr CRC S'L'XK auu
---� EMT. • P00005E7 PMOPERTT LRIEl
- -- CtRTt4�4
c.�T ELSTP4 TmE 4
0
CI'S'Y OY gANC����� GA
STAFF R
June 9, 1982
DATE: Commissian
TO: Members of the Planning
FROM:
Lloyd B• Hubbs, City Engineer
Shintu Bose, P.ssociate Civil Engineer
BY:
SO$JECT: Environmental Assessment and Parcel W acr pto
Lomita Drive between Hellman4and Nnethyst -� zone -
N3
on
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
0 osititig to subdivide existing 2 lots into 4 parcels in a
The applicant is P'' P resently vacant and there is no proposal
residential area. The site is presently
property ?s surrounded an al �owadds by
The p. F the parcels is
for development at this time- Drainage o. - La Grande Dr. and Lomita
The contiguous streets
existing residential develoPn s.
a southeasterly direction d.
Dr- - are not fully
improved-
ANALYSIS'
=
The General Plan designathstthe ara proposed
Existing zoning of the site is - 4dwelling units per acre)- gents will be
as law density residential (2- residential developr
design of the map, only single famslY conform to the General plan require-
the
in the future on each parcel to
ments. Offsite improvemnftof°the parcel se and Lomita Drive will be required
at the time of developme
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
Dieted Part II of the Initial
a our review and consideration is Part I of the Initial Study
Also attached for Y licant. Staff has cam, investigation-
as Staff
as completed by the aPp and field investig
Study, the environmental w of Initial studyd`c`ed afield invest " ion.
upon completion and review o environment ac a result of the
found no significant adverse impacts on the
proposed subdivision.
FACTS OF FINDINGS:
This reject is consistent with the zoning ordinance and General Plan designation
p - low density.
of residential
CORRES property ou+ners and
Notice of Public Hearing
have been irzil t�nsthe Daily d g Report rewspaper.
a notice of public hearing has been placed
0 continued...
ITEM 0
Staff Report — Planning Comm.
Re: P.M. 7441
June 9, 1982
Page 2
RECOMMENDAnoi. .
It is recomnended that the Planning Commission consider all input and elements
of the project. If, after such consideration, the Commission can support
the facts for findings and recommended conditions of approval, then adoption
of the attached Resolution would be appropriate.
Respectfully submit�e d,
LEH:— :bc
Attachments
E
E
! RESOLUTION NO
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PARCEL MAP NUMBER 7441 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 7441)
LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF LOMITA DRIVE, 321'±
WEST OF AMETHYST STREET
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 7441, submitted by
Donald Tackett and consistira of four lal parcels, located on the
north side of Lomita Drive., 321'± west of Amethyst Street, being a
division of Lots 1 and 2 of Tract 2190 as recorded in Book 31, Page 69
of records, County Recorder of San Bernardino County, and
WHEREAS, on April 12, 1982, a formal application was sub-
mitted requesting review of the above - described tentative map; and
WHEREAS, on June 9, 1982, the Planning Commission held a duly
advertised public hearing for the above - described map-
NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNIN2 M MISSION
RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
® SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made:
I. That the map is consistent with the proposed General
Plan.
2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is
consistent with the proposed General Plan.
3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed
development.
4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will
not cause substantial environmental damage, public
health problems or have adverse affects on abutting
property.
SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant
adverse environmental impacts and a Negative Declaration is issued on
June 9, 1982-
SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 7441 is aiproved
subject to the conditions t;f the City Engineer's Report perta nirg
thereto.
11
Resolution No.
Page 2
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 1982.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Jeffrey King, Chairman
ATTEST'
Secretary of the Planning Commission
I. JACK LAM;, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Ranchc
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commmissio, of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting cf the Planning
Commission held on the 9th day of June, 1982, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: CONPIISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMISSIONERS:
a
E
0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
® CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT
�f FILED BY: Donald Tackett TENTATIVE MAP N0. P.M. 7441
LOCATION:_ North side of Lomita Drive
DATE FILED: 4 -13 -82
321'± weer of Amethyst NUMBER. OF LOTS: 4
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots i and 2 of Tract 2190, M.B. RECEIPT NUMBER:
31, Page 69, San Bernardino Co.
FEE: $273
ZONE: R -1
TENTATIVE MAP PREPARED BY: J. Richard Newton GROSS RlP.EAGE: 91
ADDRESS:_ 624 West "I" Street
MINIMUM LOT AREA:
Ontario, California 91762 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE:
RECORD OWNER(S) ADDRESS
® Dan Tackett 335 East McKinley
Pomona, Ca. 91767
REPORT OF THE CITY ENGINEER
Dedications
1. Dedication by final map of all interior street rights -of -way and
easements as shown on the tentative map.
2. Dedication by final map of the following missing rights -of -way on
streets:
3.
4.
5.
6.
RCE 20
PHONE
G29 -1549
all necessary
the following
additional feet on
additional feet on
additional feet on
_ Corner P/L radius required cn
Other
Rights of vehicular access shall be limited as follows:
Street vacation required for:
Master Plan of Streets revision required or:
The following perimeter intersections require realignment as follows:.
TENTATIVE MAP NO. 7441
Page 2
Improvements (Bonding is required prior to 17 Recording for 0
131 Building permit 1
7. Construct full street improvements (including curb and gutter, A.C. pavement,
sidewalk, one drive approach per lot, parkway trees and street lights) on all
interior streets.
_ 8 8. Construct the following missing improvements on the following streets:
7ncludina land5caninn anal ;rrinaf;nn n.. . -..+__
STREET NAME
CURS &
GUTTER
A.C.
PVMT.
SIDE-
WALK
DRIVE
APPR.
STREET
TREES
STREET
LIGHTS
MEDIAN
ISLAND*
OTHER
Lomita
X
X
X
X
X
X
La Grande
X
X
X
X
X
X
EEE
X 9. Construct all storm drain and drainage structures as shown on the tentative
map, or as required by the City Engineer.
X 10. Provide all utility services to each lot including sanitary sewers, water,
electric power, gas, telephone and cable teievision.conduit. All utilities
are to be underground.
X li. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of
any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary.
_ 12. Install appropriate street name signs and traffic control signs with loca-
tions and types approved by the City Engineer.
X 13. Developer is to provide all construction plans for drainage and street im-
provements. Such plans shall meet approval of the City Engineer.
X 14. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water
District standards. A letter of acceptance is required.
X 15. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern
California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall be decorative
Poles with underground service.
15. The following existing streets being turn up by new services will require an
A.C. overlav•
_ 17. The Io I lowing specs roc dimensions, (i.e., cu -de -sac radius, street section
widths) are not approved:
_ 18. The 1U3 lowing existing streets are substandard:
They will require:
A22rovals and Fees
19. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of
'San Bernardino County Flood Control District.
X 20. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities
Gies involved. Approval of the final map will be
that may be received from them.
RCE 20
approvzi from CALTRANS/
and other interested agen-
subject to any requirements
TENTATIVE MAP NO. 7441 Page 3
21. Permits from other agencies will be required as follow::
A. Caltrans, for:
S. City:
C. County Dust Abatement District:
D. D_I.S. Trenching Pernit if any trenches are over 5' deep:
c. Cucamonga County Water District:
F. Other:
Map Control
22. If only a portion of this Map is recorded, adjustments shall be made to pro-
- vide for two -way traffic and Narking oP all affected streets.
23. The foilowing lots appear to be substandard in either frontage, depth or area
and should be corrected on the final map: -
24. All corner lots shall have a corner radius at the right -of -way accord-
- ante with the City of P.ancho Cucamonga standards.
25. A Parcel lap shall be recorded prior to the first phase subdivision to prevent
the creation of an unrecognized parcel located
_ 2[, ahe boundary cf the Te:1tativ° P1ap needs c arification as fo ows:
27. The border shall be shown to centerline of existing perimeter streets, or
title explanation required.
® Parcel Map JJaiver
28. Information submitted at the time of application is / e not sufficient
to support the issuance of a waiver of Parcel Map Certific te, according to
requirements of the State Map Act and local ordinances. for
tp( (Bonding is required prior to Q All
DRAINAGE
_29.
30.
_31.
32.
33.
X 34
RCE 20
Proposed subdivision falls within those areas indicated as subject to flood-
ing under the National Flood Insurance Program. This subdivision will be
subject to the provisions of that program and Ordinance No. 24.
A drainage channel and /or flood protection wail along the entire north pro-
perty line may be required to divert sheet runoff to streets.
Such flow may be required to go under sidewalks through culverts.
If cater surface is above top of curb, 30" walls shall be required at the
back of the sidewalk at all downstream curb returns.
Culverts required to be constructed across streets at following locations:_
Broad scale hydrologic stuaies will be reouirea w -
runoff.
gutter on the south property
Provide private drainage easement and concrete "V"
line on Parcel 2 and the ea<` - . ,)Po' *-v line of Parcel 3 for the drainage of
Parcel 1 & 2. These easements will be _ +.o_lineated on the map.
TENTATIVE MAP N0.
Page 4
Miscellaneous 0
_ 35. Dust abatement will be made a condition of issuance of the grading permit for
this project.
_ 36. rioise impact on this project will be mitigated in accordance with the Planning
Division report on subject property.
37. This property is not within the present City Boundary and will require
annexation.
38. Ali information required to be shown on the tentative map is not shown as re-
quired:_
_ 39. Proper grading and erosion. cort--I, in,c,ud�ny the Preventation of nedlmenta-
tion or damage to offsite property shall be provided for as required.
_ 40. A preliminary soils report will not be required for this site for the follow-
ing reasons: A copy of the soils report furnished to the Building Division
prior r j will be r h
41. The fili -.gofthetentativemaoor approvalnofn same ndoes vnot oguarantee that
sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are
requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County plater
District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits wall
not be issued unless said certification is received in writing.
42. The City Engineer shall make the determination, in accordance with Section
66436(0)(1) of the Subdivision Map Act, that division and development of the
property will not unreasonabiy interfere with the free and complete exercise
of any public entity or public Utility right -of -way or easement and the sign
tore of any such public entity or public utility may be omitted from the fin
map unless the City is notified in writing of any objection to said determina-
tion within ti--c specified time limits of said Section.
43. At the time of Finsl Map submittal, the following shell be submitted: Traverse
calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and/
or showing original land division, tie rot -s and bench marks referenc;•d.
_ 44. Developr:;ent sha11 be limited to one drive approach per street. Multiple lots
fronting on a single street shall use com.ton drive approaches at lot lines.
RCE 20
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LLOYD B. HUBBS
CITY ENGINEER
By:
u
E
CITY OF RANCHO C'uCAMONGA
INITIAL S'T_UDY
PART I - PROJECT INIS)RN,ATION STF- -'ET - To be completed by applicant
Enviro=.ental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00
For all projects rev_uirirg environmental review, this
form must be completed and submitted to the Development
Review Committee through the department where the
project application is made. Upoz_ receipt of this
application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare
Part II of the Initial Study. The Developmert Review
Committee will meet and take action no later than ten
(10) days before the public meeting at which time the
project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of
three determinations: 1) The project will have no significant
environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be
filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact
and an Irnvironmentai Impact Report will he prepared, or 3) An
additional information report should be supplied by the applicant
giving further information concerning the pronosed project.
PROJECT TITLE: —_
APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE:
NAPM, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE COETACTED
CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: same as above
WCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AIM ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.)
.T- gtrpri- AA2 rPCQ— T..fg 1L_7 m...,.. + 'NT.. 7150 SM ci}�
of Rancho Cucamonga.County San B °cnardino
LIZT OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND
FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS:
none
- I - -f
A
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 0
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: unknown
ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA
PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF
AND
SQUARE FOOTAGE
OF EXISTING A?D
ANY:
-39.662 Ft.
totsI
DESCRIBE THE ENVIRON?�"TrAL.SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE -
INCLUDING INFOR-N2ATION ON TOPOGRAFis'`r, ANTS (TR-ES) ,
ANTIMALS, 3N'Y CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCE"TIC ASPECTS, USE
OF SURROLNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY
EXISTING STRUCTURES ANTD THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS):
Houses- Apartments are on the surrounding properties
no trees, plants or an ma s
Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series
Of cumulative actions, which althouqh individually small,
May as a whole have significant environmental impact?
no
0
1.1
WILL TIiIS i 'ROJECT:
YES NO
1. Create a substantial charge in ground
contours?
_ X 2. Create a substantial change in existing
noise or vibration?
X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for
municipal services (police, fire, water,
sewage, etc.).
X 4. Create chances in the existing zoning or
general plan designations?
X 5: Remove any existing trees? How many?
X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of
potentially hazardous materials such as
toxic substances, flammables or explosives?
Explanation of any YES answers above:
IMPORTA-NT: If the project involves the construction of
residential units, complete the form on the
next page.
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished
above and in the attached exhibits present the data and
information required for this initial evaluation to the
best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and
information presented are true and correct to the best of
n;y knowledge and belief. I further understand ti-at
additional information may be required to be submitted
before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Development
Review Committee.
p
Date —� :t ��S 0. Signature
J
Title�+��
I
r..iro n. x. •Gwiwo azn. t.
. Vi[ x iTwQi• 4S1.PN .IW
rr� .
>n. vitae na. w. i.OS1f
fsr C1 �Lr.T
.s.mnsx\c La .. .amcmn.
{ySIC .L 1 GJr mim a
yV.1.OL6 mm�+L •x L La. .ocml c x
.umss a mi r o. tc
reu A LY.LO ra. Las eLxQ
w u1 LOffr
bOIC. �[ OY.aT I1LL
J .5
osa x. 1.o TE'AVr4rl E MAP
A61,2CEL AIIAP 1 441
IN THE
CITY OF RANCMQ CUCAMONGA
60" Y f FN,1W.6ErtwT OFLOf3 152 OF MUCT 2170
rs We
if
I
Tq.4CT INO 123261 I i
L-A-GRANDE - '� ".• �• `.�•� —BREVE
T �
� v .ryylL.r fi• -r\Te Grkwl,� =Ir\' {yt �3,
— • •r 41rt1.r1 w� Q
-- COLtITA - — --
6 1-
i tn
ti- •• Q
. ••..Prk?. J
IT ^• � V
T-
IS
La MI1511l71�
• r +>sa
R DRIVE
I
1
> 1
Y
J r
J
S
1
1
S
1
i
Cl
65.5
G5.9
xz•. i.:ls
• �..e.:i
.I 1
4
b llwiw
M Kf. \�
^
n P
•�
J
• Q�
V
. "n• r
" 653
65.5
�
� v .ryylL.r fi• -r\Te Grkwl,� =Ir\' {yt �3,
— • •r 41rt1.r1 w� Q
-- COLtITA - — --
6 1-
i tn
ti- •• Q
. ••..Prk?. J
IT ^• � V
T-
IS
La MI1511l71�
• r +>sa
R DRIVE
I
1
> 1
Y
J r
J
S
1
1
S
1
i
Cl
El
0
11
2
]
CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 9, 1982
TO: Members of the Planning COmi-ission
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82 -09 - WHITEHEAD - The proposed
development of a dog kennel for raising and breeding
dogs in the A -1 zone on 1.85 acres of land located at
8406 Hamilton Street - APN 202 - 021 -50.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The Applicant is requesting review
and apProvaT to reed and raise dogs on property in the A -1 zone
located on the north side of Hamilton Street, west of Jasper Street
(Exhibit "A "). The kennels are located behind the Applicant's house
as shown cn the Site Plan (Exhibit "B "). The Applicant desires to
maintain a maxirmur of six (6) adult dogs. ;he dogs will be kept
in outdoor pens. The pens have cement floors and are enclosed by
six -foot high chainlink fences.
Surrounding land uses and zoning include single family dwellings
in the R -1 zone to the south and single family dwellings in the
A -1 zone to the north, west, and east.
ANALYSIS: The A -1 zone allows four adult dogs (4 months or older)
per lot. i,e Applicant intends to breed their personal pets only
No commercial boarding is proposed now or contemplated in the future.
Problems associated with kernels usually are traffic generation
from customers, odors, noises and unrraintained facilities. Staff
has suggested conditions which address all of these issues. Since
no boarding is allowed, traffic generation won't be a problem.
Conditions require the continued maintenance of the facilities.
An inspection of the facilities was made by staff and we found
them to be well maintained and constructed. Based upon the Appli-
cant's desire and size of the pens, it is suggested that the maxi-
mum number of adult dogs kept not exceed eight (8). Any proposed
expansion of the facilities or increased number of dogs shall re-
quire a revised Conditional Use Permit. The dog pens are located
well away from the single family neighborhood to the south and
approximately 70 -80 feet from the adjacent dwelling to the east.
Because of these distances and the small number of dogs proposed,
ITEM E
CUP 82- 09114hitehead
® Planning Commission Agenda
June 3, 1982
Page 2
noise is not seEn as a significant problem. However, if significant
noise problems arise as a result of the kennel, mitigation of the problem
will be expected by the Applicant.
FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan
and the Zoning Ordinance- The proposed Kennel use, together with the
reca- =ended Conditiens of Approval, would not be detrimental to the public
safety or environment upon compliance with these Conditions of Approval.
CORRESPONDENCE: A public hearing notice was advertised in the Daily Report
newspaper and 28 public hearing notices were mailed to surrounding property
owners within 300 feet of the project site. Some phone calls were received
stating concern with boarding dogs and the potential for noise disturbances.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider
all input and material relative to this project. A Resolution of Approval
with Conditions is provided for your review and consideration.
R spectfully submitted,
� d
1 �OCT
RICK GOMEZ
City Planner
i
RG:MV:jr
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity 4aP
Exhibit °B" - Site Plan
Resclution of Approval with Conditions
r]
l
lu
z
eL
Ll
I 1
SUSJEG?'�--'`
PROPER, (�
e �-
1
N•AMti1�0 ST
i
t _ i
,!t
! t t
JANR.
swtawgy
- b*ROvL
p� nSJ u�(
RT H
Q
VICINITY MAP
C.0 U-Q9
'EYK 1 JIT "Ax
s
i
t _ i
,!t
! t t
JANR.
swtawgy
- b*ROvL
p� nSJ u�(
RT H
Q
VICINITY MAP
C.0 U-Q9
'EYK 1 JIT "Ax
11
7,
!
PENS
DtN��t nib K- �Eow(,
SUN EGT PROPERTY
144046 HAMILTON
wlc�
51iEDs
HAMILTON STREET
yllI
NORTk�
SITE PLAN
W 82 09
Duil !T *w
11
0
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCA,MONrLA PLANNING
COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
NO. 82 -09 FOR A DOG KENNEL LOCATED AT 8406
HAMILTON STREET IN THE A -1 ZONE
WHEREAS, on the ?0th day of May, 1982, a complete application
was filed by Patti Whitehead for review of the above - described project;
and
WHEREAS, on the 9th day of June, 1982, the Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider she above - described
project.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission
resolved as follows:
SECTION is That the fallowing findings can be met:
1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan
and the purpose of the zone in which the use is proposed;
and
?. That the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety, or welfare, or materially in-
jurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity;
and
3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the
applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinarce.
SECTION 2: That Conditional Use Permit No. 82 -09 is approved
subject to the .o owing conditions:
1. All necessary permits and licenses such as City
Business License, dog license, or other agency
permits shall be obtained.
2. The pens shall be continuously maintained to prevent
odors, flies or any other public health and safety
probl ems.
3. No commercial boarding, training, or grooming of
dogs is allowed on said property.
CUP 82 -09
Page Two
4. No commercial boarding, training, or grooming of
aogs is allowed on said property.
5. All dogs shall be contained within the property at
all times, unless supervised and restrained on leashes.
�. Should this use cause public nuisances which cannot
be appropriately mitigated, then the City Planner
shall have the option to schedule a public hearing
before the Commission for consideration of the CUP.
7. No expansior,of the existing facilities or increase
in the number of dogs is allowed without obtaining a
revised Conditional Use Permit.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9th DAY OF JUNE, 1982.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Zeffrey King, Chairman
ATTEST:
Secretary o e anning oo-,I
1, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Com-
mission held on the 9th day of June, 1982, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COn4iSSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS
:J
E
E
El
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 9, 1982
TO. Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY: Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82 -06 - EASON - The temporary use of
an existing structure for a church facility in the Industrial
Park category (Subarea 7), located at 11837 Foothill Boulevard
APN 229 - 011 -21.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting review and
approval for an interim c urch facility to be located on the south side
of Foothill Boulevard, 300' west of Rochester Avenue. The previous use
of the building was a nightclub known as The Image. The church will
occupy the building temporarily with an initial lease for one year.
The church, known as Victory Chapel, was granted a Conditional Use Permit
to operate in the Cucamonga Business Park at the southwest corner of Arrow
and Archibald. Conditional Use Permit approval at that site will expire
in June 1983. However, on June 14, 1982, their lease with Cucamonga Busi-
ness Park expires. A new lease has already been signed with the property
owner of 11837 Foothill Boulevard, and work on the building has already
begun.
As shown on the Site Plan (Exhibit "B "), the footprint of the building
is 6216 square feet with 43 parking spaces. The congregation currently
has a membership of 55. The church meetings scheduled include Sunday
services plus normal weekday office hours and evening meetings. As out-
lined in the letter from Pastor Victor Eason (Exhibit "C "), the church
is planning only minor maintenance work to the building, such as cleaning,
painting, and replacement of bathroom fixtures.
ANALYSIS: The Industrial Specific Plan allows churches in Subarea 7 with
approval of a Conditional Use Permit. On -site parking is available to
meet the demand for this use. General clean -up items, such as painting,
weed remoial, and parking lot striping, is proposed by the church.
ITEM F
Conditional Use Permit 82 -06 /'Eason
Planning Commission Agenda
June 9, 1982
Page 2
The major issue relative to this project is public safety. As it exists,
the building does not meet the fire code requirements for public assembly.
The Foothill Fire Protection District has reported that improvements will
be necessary before the building is safe. The work includes such items
as panic hardware, emergency lighting, and construction of secondary exits.
An inspector for the Fire District has requested that the Applicant submit
detailed interior alteration plans and a site plan showing the distance
to the nearest fire hydrant, the distance of the building from the curb
and other Prooerty lines, as well as other pertinent information. Staff
recommends that public assembly not be permitted until the Fire Code re-
quirements have been completed to the satisfaction of Foothill Fire Pro-
tection District.
FAC -3 FOR FINDING: The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan,
Zoning Ordinance, and the policies of the Industrial Specific Plan. The
proposed use_ together with the recommended Conditions of Approval, will
not be detrimental to the public safety or environment upon compliance
with Fire District conditions.
CORRESPONDENCE: A public hearing notice was advertised in The Daily Report
newspaper and 3 public hearing notices were mailed to surrounding property
owners within 300 feet of the project site. To date, the only correspon-
dence received is from the Foothill Fire Protection, District.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that
above-described request and consider all
this project. A Resolution of Approval
your review and consideration.
ly submitted,
RICK`GOMEZ
City Planner
J: CJ: jr
the Planning Commission review the
input and material relative to
with Conditions is provided for
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "i3" - Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Letter from Applicant
Resolution of Approval with Conditions
U
11
fY
A-1
PC,
f C 16�1 LL_�
f--
E
v 01'
CIT JL
ITE
RANCHO CUCAXIO',-,,,GA, T=:
PLANNNJ\G DIVISION
i/ �
Norcm
4�
n n 4w —ilk
ii •\
r pp
� U
3 s
v
l� ;.
I r
h
J
'II k r ..
`
fi•z F i 1
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAIN-10 GA
PLANNING DIVLSM
TITLE: ?M
EXHIBIT: °F�7 SCALE-_ktrc�
C
0
Pastor
1.J
9513 Business Center Drive, Suite J
91730
Vic Eason
City of Rancho Cucmonga
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
ATTENTION: Planning Department
RE: 11837 Foothill
Dear Sirs:
'religious Fetich and education of the
11837 Foothill o£ Rancho Cucamonga"
The subject premises .
will be used for rel "g la.: church services
local church theVicto yuChapel. The eregulir church r se Rancho
Cucamonga mornings and evenings. The
will be conducted on both Sunda„
Mid-week activiY will be that �f Pastoral urayer,leadership,
teachers meetings ect.
There are presently approximately 55 members cf the congrega-
tion representing approximately half that many cars. This
would not have a negative impact on the area. The prior t
usage of parking facilities exceeded 100.
The improvements needed to make the fac =lity functional are
as follows:
1.Bas�.c clean Ong both inside and out.
2.9air_ttng ar the structure (inside and out).
3.The replaneidet'mprovements will bedtemporar, and condeiteonaly�
All other
newal of an annual lease.
upon re
RespPetfully submitted,
victor D. Eason
CITY OF
RANCHO CLCANION- GA
R ANN[NG DiVLSKaN
T(TLE: °r t�*� �ee�rk►rr
EXHiBiT= "C SCALE: 66
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING
COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.
82 -06 FOR A CHURCH AND RELATED OFFICES LOCATED
AT 11837 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, IN THE INDUSTRIAL
PARK CATEGORY - APN 229 - 011 -21
WHEREAS, on the 5th day of May, 1982, a complete application
was tiled by Victor Eason for review of the above - described project; and
WHEREAS, on the 9th day of June, 1982, the Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above- described
project.
NOW THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved
as follows:
SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met:
1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General
Plan, and the purposes of the zone in which the use
is proposed; and
2. That the proposed ;se, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety, or welfare, er materially
injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity; and
3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the
applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance.
SECTION 2: That Conditional Use Permit No. 82 -08 is approved
subject to the following conditions:
PLANNING DIVISION
1. This use shall be permitted at this location for
a maximum of three (3) years from the date of
approval.
2. No group meetings will be permitted :,hich would
exceed the available parking or cause adverse
effects upon abutting businesses. Should any
problems arise, this CUP will be brought back
to the Commission for reconsideration.
3. Remove existing deteriorated free - standing sign
at parking lot entrance and sion above front
porch. Any new signs proposed for the Church
requires a sign P6 mit submitted to and approved
by the Planning Division.
Resolution No.
Page 2
4. Public assembly or other large group meetings may
not occur until such time as Title 19 and 24 of the
State Fire Marshal's Regulations have been complied
with. Plans shall be submitted to the Building &
Safety Division and the Foothill Fire Protection
District to show compliance -with both said Titles.
5. The three ;3) stalls shown on the site plan in the
driveway along the east side of the building shall
be eliminated. All remaining parking spaces shown
shall be double striped per city standards prior
to occupancy.
5. The exter'.cr of the building and trellis work above
the front porch shall be painted.
7. Preschools or schools are not permitted by this
permit; however, this shall not preclude nurseries
or Sunday School as a normal function of the church.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 1982.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Jeffrey King, Cnairman
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Panning Commission
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of RanchG Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 9th day of June, 1982, by the following vote -to-
kit:
,YES:
COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
COMMMISSIONERS:
11
M
E
CTTY OF KANCHC CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
1977
DATE: June 9, 1982
TO: Members of the Planning Commiss on
FOOM: PiCk rwneo fi+y Clznnar
BY: Arlene Troup, Assistant Planne-
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82 -11 - WENZEL - LAMB OF GOD
EVA`JGELICAL LUTHERAN CHL' CH --The esta ishment of a
church in a 2628 square foR unit of an industrial com-
plex in the General Industrial area (Subarea 4) located
on the east side of Archibald avenue south of 6th Street
APN 210 - 071 -25.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The Applicant is requesting review and
approval of an interim church facility for Pariod of one year, with
an option to renew, to be located it unit nrmber 504 of the Crescent
Business Center on Archibald Avenue, just south of the Archicenter.
The site is designated in the Industrial Specific Plan as General indus-
trial, Subarea 4, in which church related uses are allowed, subject
to approval of a Conditional Use Permit- by tie Planning Commission.
The Crescent Business Center is comprised of 26 units in 9 buildi -ags
and has 310 parking spaces. Presently there are only three other units
that are being occupied. Refer to Exhibit "t" for identification and
location of the other tenants. Only the leaving office is in the same
building, to date. The hours of operation o'' the existing uses should
not cause a conflict with the proposed churcl services. Therefore,
ample parking is available for this use on s-te.
ANALYSIS: This request is similar to church applications previously
approved by the Planning Commissi-n within irdustriai complexes. In
the past, the Commission has approved such us =s as a temporary use in
order to allow the church time to find a peririnent location. The Lamb
of God Church is presently looking for a perrr•inent facility.
The church will occupy a 2628 square foot uni: with a current congregation
of acproximately 80 people. The church is priposing to hold services and
Sunday Sc:ool on Sundays. This building was not originally constructed
for public assembly uses. Therefore certain mprovements will be required
by the Foothill Fire Protection District in older to insure public safety.
Evening services would be held at 7 p.m. weekrights for Bible studies and
ITEM G
CUP 82 -11 /Wenzel
Planning Co:�nission Agenda
June 9, 1982
Page 2
special activities. The only other daytime uses would be office uses and
sore _mall Bible studies groups.
FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The proposed use is in accordance with the General
Plan and the Industrial Specific Flan. The proposed church use, together
with the recor:* ended C^,A+i0ns of Approval, would not be detrimental to
the public Wafety or environment.
CORRESPONDENCE: A puolic hearing notice was advertised in The Daily Report
newspaper and sixteen notices were mailed to property owners xi.hin 3 O feet
of the subject property. To date, no correspondence has been received either
for or against this application.
RECOM'4ENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning_ Commission review the
above describe request and consider all input and material relative to
this project. A Resolution of Approval with Conditions has been provided
for your review and consideration.
Pbspe tfu�y submitted,
RICK OMEZ
City .lanner
RG�AT: jr
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map
Exhibit "B" - Site PIan
Resolution of Approval
11
E 11
11
T.S. P.
CITY r.
aANCHO CLGA 'IO \G�
PLAN UNG DlNgSK)N
c�
1Kli��'
rrEat- ----
TrrL.E' p ,
EX,,,.T= _ty --ALE_ -
Future Devetopm t
1 0
14.000 SJ-
i
}
w,
la v.11
rutty -e Devdopmmt
C�t C.mtw Dr.
003 I ]01
8.100". 8.200".
F
R
r� \
Future Devcicpmmt
0
CITY OF rrEA1: 'a' C [ 1 P
RANCHO CL'CAIXIO \'GA TITLE: e- man
PLANNLtG DIVISION EXHIBIT- _ $__ SCALE- -Qa e
E
a.ew s.s.
L
HOW
,
Future Devcicpmmt
0
CITY OF rrEA1: 'a' C [ 1 P
RANCHO CL'CAIXIO \'GA TITLE: e- man
PLANNLtG DIVISION EXHIBIT- _ $__ SCALE- -Qa e
E
r
LJ
0
9
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCA•1ONGA PLANNING
COrIMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.
82 -11 FOR WENZEL LOCATED 04 THE EAST SIDE OF
ARCHIBALD
GENERAL INDUSTRIAL S(SUBAREA 4) STREET IN THE
WHEREAS, on the 21st day of May, 1982, a complete application
was filed by Glern Wenzel for review of the above- described project; and
WHEREAS, on the 9th day of June, 19821 the Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described
project.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission
resolved as follows:
SECTION 1: That the following findings can be Get:
1 That tae is in ac it
,nd thpurposesofthezoe in which the use
is proposed; and
2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety, or welfare, or materially
injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity; and
3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the
applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance.
SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse
impacts or. the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on
June 9, 1982.
SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 82 -11 is approved
subject to the following conditions:
PLANNING, DIVISION
1. This use shall be permitted at this location for three
(3) years from the date of approval.
2 offices may be used for
after 6:00 p.m.group
o uweeekk nights only on
Resolution No.
Page 2
3. No group r^°etings will be permitted which would exceed
the availabie parking or cause adverse effects upon
abutting businesses. Should any problems arise, this
CUP will be brought back to the Commission for recon-
sideration.
4. Public assembly or other large group meetings may not
occur until such time as all Uniform Building Code
-nd Title 19 and 24 of the State Fire Marshal's Regu-
lations have been complied with.
$. Preschools or schools are not ;.`rmit±eii by this permit;
however, this shall not preclude nurseries or Sunday
School.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 1982.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Jeffrey King, Chairman
ATTEST: 0
Secretary of the Planning Commission
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Punning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
reaularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 9th day of June, 1982, by the following vote -to-
wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
9
13
c STAFF REPORT GA
F
DATE: June 9, 1982
TG:
Members of the Planning Commission
FROM:
Rick Gomez, City Planner
Dan Coleman, ASSOCia�2
Pia »Tier
8Y' PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 82 -02 -
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTLANDY - A change of zone from
SUBJECT: 7 108`6 Residential - 1`z acre lots) to
TENTATIVE TPAC a ami y r,t} and
R- 1- 20,000 Family Residential /Plannunits�,e81�patio homes
R -21PD ( ent of 27 single Family located
the developm 660 feet south
and 202 townhouse units on 57• lan 65, e and 69.
between Haven and Hermosa- approximately
of Wilson - APN 201 - 181 -12, 13, 14, 02, 63,
applicant is requesting approval of
The app R_2 PD pending }, located
PROJECT AID SITE DESCRIPTION: The property
a Planned Oeve opment in thso th of�Wilsonn(Exhibit "A ")- approximately
between Haven
vacantea �sslopes from the north to Exhibit "I ) This site
is presently o and north of a flood control
5 -6`o grade as shown on the Natural Features Map
is across the street from Chaffey
basin. the Benign Review, Growth
ANALYSIS: The project has been reviewed by Committees. All the issues
� Grading, and Equestrian AdviflrC in the attached Tentative
Mangconce
and concerns of these Committees velopment Plans and recommended with a private
o
Tract Map (Exhibit B )' 'e has been designed with roposed to
Approval. This Planned Development
street system, therefore , there are no street connections p
properties- The Site Utilization would
future streets ion Sur 2sua master plan for a street system
The
(Exhibit "J °`) of the natural
enable surrounding properties to tovmaintain more
Plan, Exhibit "F" F- riate drainage structures to accept and
contours and to Provide app P
flood
divert water into the control basin to the Bout - Applicant in
DESIGN REVIEW C�,ggITTEE The Com�ittee has worked with the App
tot lots, grading, and street design_
resolving concerns t relative mix of architectural styles royal of this orce
the village concep , Providing
nds app
Therefore, the Design Review Committee recommends
project.
ITEM H
PD 82- 02 /Lesny
Planning Commission Agenda
June 9, 1982
Page 2
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Part I of the Initial Study, as completed by the
Applicant, is attache for your review. Staff has completed Part Ii of
the Initial Study and found that although the project could have a signi-
ficant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect
because the mitigation measures described in the attached Initial Studv
Part II have been added to the project. Therefore, staff reconnends issu-
ance of a Negative Declaration.
FACTS FOR FINDING: The Subdivision Map has been prepared in accordance
with City standards and policies including the new Council Resolution on
north Alta Loma. The project site is suitable for the proposed subdivision
and the project design is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Ordi-
nance requirements.
CORRESPONDENCE: A Notice of Public Hearing was published in The Dail Re ort
newspaper and approximately 26 notices were sent to property owners wit in
300 feet of the project site To date, no correspondence has been received
eith3r for or against this project. Prior to the public hearing, the Appli-
cant will be meeting with surrounding property owners to discuss the project.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission Conduct a
public he to consider public input and elements of this project. If,
after such consideration, the Commission concurs with the findings and Condi-
tions of Approval, the the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance
of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate.
lly submitted,
RACK QOMEZ
Cij11ty Planner
RG{DC:jr
Attachments:
Exhibit "A" -
Exhibit "8" -
Exhibit "C" -
Exhibit "D" -
Exhibit "E" -
Exhibit "F" -
Exhibits "G -1
Exhibits "H -1
Exhibit "I" -
Exhibit "J" -
Exhibit "K" -
Exhibit "L" -
Initial Study
Resolution of
Location Map
Subdivision Mao
Detailed Site Plan & Phasing Plan
Illustrative Site Plan
Conceptual Landscape Plan
Conceptual Grading Plan
through "G -5" - Elevations
through "H -3" - Floor Plans
Natural Features Map
Site Utilization Map
Haven Streetscape
Sections
Parts I & II
Approval with Conditions
E
l
,
1
=Tar�
All
IV
� ✓ _
T �4tv',��eA
:� ice. -J/ ^� _
I
ga:...
t.I 4 • ,_1 4
V
n�odrn -c
I
CITY OF l D sZfo
RANCHO CUCAMONGA �,
EXHddidT _E2 $Cpj g: ---
LJ
_ -'m= l `
~ • \ �+'� -'� "Y �`� Ij-e• �w ! � ..7 - �'u - --mac.. F-'- _ ' .t: aaa , j ,. i ' , rs; � �'�'^ ���. h
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING Y?iN%10N
'R I
° L
.
_ ..w_._.
� �I. 1
1
•
I
+� �_ -
•iYii�..�. :i � ...�C•�w4uM MFG..
11 i.' % ~•�11
�w.�
1
��n�l _
_
u %�
NJ�wJLI!' AI M� .w
r•M1�w��
Y � 1•
'
1 w
pQp MOML1
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING Y?iN%10N
'R I
° L
r " • do
.1
r'
r v' —) ��S,T-i^ '•� ^,�N���.`w1J a pr wt4��i��/ • {t" �1.4�• 4F� •• �7 ��•: ` .
•• • " ' "�'t a'�C. _' �g'V�.i`!.
�l
w +s• • 5 �r�'Y�
..
�.� "ern —.L F. . 4� ...5 r��. d`��► �+�y: +��•a..� :,
, Mi " "lgro l• a .1 �rP orrr rr •}r��.''� �'f''•tl p
r.❖ _ w ) i � • � }•� "'• Y.arl'h1r•'rp e\ •.! hh- " Q••3 O'�•ti ' '.t
f j
LAM UM SLMWAAM
�Ypf.' , � �• �'
L
,J
1
NURTH
CITY RtVNCM • pr
MT 04g Z<
NrGA
. •
AIla•A/(i
DiVO t. -
G
�` y 1Y' :1.'ti„M'r .��,�,., • ;�y.�... "•�;�a� vn '71A�,7Tsy'.J_i'i� Jt.•iTef `.,..., ���"��,p.- •j!�,��1, �'. "- .♦:y -�±�• • pl �.
t � Ia �t�� «�+t� �.._ rl.w..t.• -. °~�• ,'�'•� ��."">7„ i. '!•ter• t
• h ti c �Ix\i ' �f •o. ••w�u• "]i mow' "'a�!. .�.��ir ♦—�� :�
r "' _ a�iiT��•Lj �Q '�aT .'v °d� `aly.°.�• 9fq�i '`� "b' '�•. _a +: t�'x
.i ° .,,- .( -I.�` i .1�`t,. a •�y�Ar ^)�b �Ml°•-••�SG!� ° •)� �• �.
.,�_ = �`+�rir "•, a_ -w` +• :•�!W� v '►tea' :� ^.• i��]•'2L"i y� ?�(i(j, IS'�t '�`
OhNuill a rw ..(z. 1 FA
y1^:M• ��4�',,i� .e �b.. M a,���� rte: ► ti.
.��s .•i ` �a'+f- r•�j'�iyGr'�r�1'44 °�.�%lR;t: !_. Q .w��rqq•
�'41Fr'
• '" .. a :. .. .._. '. .. ,. .. 1 _. > '
—
CITE' OF
BL lX 'I IO CUC.AMONGA
PLANNING DIVIRON
. _.
o --
---
Vl
NORTH
0
ITEM=_�� f���iCfe
TITLE=
EXHIBIP— SCALE. s
El
0
u
.Y.�c w to c �} �j �'. (5•..'.w!5 . rc .( �- ••1 yilh
�, ;r,.`r.�
Fe&.f— L r, siDe rr►b i F-T. 51 C9
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCATNIONGA
Pl.ri"NTNI \G DdVLSK? \i
7PAOS HDV
ITEM: -- �m IQ%yi&
TITLE: +
��� y*T7bsjr4%
EXHIBIT: 4 OF _ SCALE
NORTH
�4v
LF
Ll
�4v
11
•..• I$..
6"MM
IF-p7TFA
CITY OF
R,LkiNc-Ho
l5ws�ic�Ae��
C-;CANION-GA
PLAT N,l!\G Dl\ ISON
c�
NORTH
IT EN 1: --::
TITLE- -- - .0-�
Awow�w
I 1�
394 1 294 1 404 I 304 I i93
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCA.NLIOINGA,
PI --kNNLI-',\G EXVMN
ITEM: 70
TITLE:
EXHIBIT:4CAj-n4_ SC-kLE.-
MINES
I]
11
Ll
0
Il
0
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMO \GA
PLANNING DIX'ISIQN
mor HomsJ
ITEM: Ir 1045 Lei►
IITLE= Of
MORRIS
.q
1
, i v �t�filYll
t�1 L 1
i t L213p1 ! lt"VAU
a _ `/`
4 i
� t'�' � � tail � ••
I t
i
i
.•
77, 1�
- � � 1 111➢1_
:22
I
I
t
n.'; }
a
-
�
W;u ,
MIX
a:
I
{
�1�
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCA�IvIO\GA
PLA.NL TL \IG DIVISIO
s7.
El
11
TIn.E:���"5 �
EXHIBIT- ° SCALD
I�
- w . G
x )
x
I =
11
??Y
llLi
y �•.��f ftll.
III
r11. �a.t
I
I
^
I ^
CC
�
uaayr
1•
N J
a:•,
lZ
6
1 %mss
L—
L7A I
all
CITY OF
R�k\CI D cuCATMONNGA
ft-,�,NNI NG DI`ISON
ul.�u zl9
�Yl
a.. sn
1 M
:I
h
I {I1i
II
�i
F II'
II II
}t-
?Mo �� / ^
V v
NORTH
TITLE' �
EXHIBIT: SCALE - -
y �•.��f ftll.
�
Ij
:I
h
I {I1i
II
�i
F II'
II II
}t-
?Mo �� / ^
V v
NORTH
TITLE' �
EXHIBIT: SCALE - -
Y -` _SUiu -w�f•J
t
YLLS'i•Illil ) r/�
t1.; 411'w•i .V• Dos � �.'.f'w)nl stl• _ _
SISLli:
I
1504w *ft
CITY OF
R \CHO C�'Cr IMO GA Triu: �� 5
PLANNING DIVOON ExHI[31 r. SCALE-
1
!�
NORTH
p
UTZ
D url\
.,•.....,. •,.,"
iii;
II L
t1.; 411'w•i .V• Dos � �.'.f'w)nl stl• _ _
SISLli:
I
1504w *ft
CITY OF
R \CHO C�'Cr IMO GA Triu: �� 5
PLANNING DIVOON ExHI[31 r. SCALE-
1
!�
NORTH
II L
L.I••)�
� .
.'viY
li. I
I � � flatll
��{{
SISLli:
I
1504w *ft
CITY OF
R \CHO C�'Cr IMO GA Triu: �� 5
PLANNING DIVOON ExHI[31 r. SCALE-
1
!�
NORTH
6 .
t•'
. 'VET- n-r< { rtY�'W�� � y •,;,d
t.R• Y* , � � L-'-� �Z� %r d ,� i51�1 �i n � . SVn <. � ,b It'! � I
'� 11✓�; ^T # _t l � �;._..l1.�_:..�����Sf�Y•9n7�x. � - ra r:
•,fit/F 0l J °`*-!r .T•rt, {•},'�T rl Z�;i'�`"�b �R�$i.4 e.94 w
4 �Yr.r.` �•'L X ^'t a,�r.. t �Y � .�.J * �: �v v� r �aiftt .1•'3'4 '
yrX-
r�,.Y 'mil .
' t?-i '�-.' � 1• t d r � I!i ..•'. y w„ .� � ` , � 't !' .n+n r! y -1'r `�
t x J- s r'{ v n �.i•i t I / > � <y ,� J . ,` S..S �.r �
is r !'•D � � r
,L
r.l
1. L i. .11 ..L1 1' ±1..
� JI
O
1
1
I
i1.
,I
ti a ' +`M • sa 1r°"Ky� `"jqs�+' yr rr�y"` h' r . e � � •.
Y�y� �, '.•�9�Yy:�'.. ��? � *�S.'rn" � ..r.' '�.2 a ''`59Ni,{''.iK/�ti:
7M ,.mac � �'.S n' ' M .. Y •.,r ; G; � wyF. ,.J. -. y6.1 ,
YY
✓� � .. Su! N .j. i �� pyt W
✓ b
7
�r' � �� ♦�i91Ri�L .: Ju'Lb ML�.:n :� ���'�i .
Y 4
r r
. IAM K_ ..,y� ' ti's • ".
NORTH
ITY OF
Q-LI •r. 1
1l: 1
• r
E.,
E
'c��C14 ai'G
CITE' OF
RAI-CHO CUCAIMOti'GA
PL ��1IING DIVLSIQN
L.�.an
IT'E,,: Mir to '570 G
T=: HAVeek
Ex} IBrr- �� SCALE-
0
I
r�
Wl0
I
'J�i lyi
CITY OF iTElbl- 'illogz&
RANCHO CUCAMONGA Trn.E=
PLANNING DIVISUNT ExHirjT- Lo SG1LE= .---
CITY OF P.ANCHO CLVCAN.ON'GA
INITIAL STUDY
PART I - PROJLCT INFORMATION SI3c.ET - To be completed by applicant
Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $80.00
For all projects requiring environmental revie.o, this
form must be completed and submitted to the Development
Review Committee through the department where the
project application is made. Upon receipt of this
application, the Envircr"ner_tal Analysis staff will prepare
Part II of the Initial Study, The Development Review
Co= ittee will meet and teke action no later than ten
(10) days before the public meeting at which time the
project is to be heard. The Corrnittee will make one of
three dc-- terminations: 1) The project will have no
en: =irc:2-= impact and a Nagative Declaration will be
filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact
and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or
3) An additional inforsation report should be supplied
by the applicant giving further information concerning
the proposed project.
PROJECT TITLE: Favpnw�od Ranch -
APPLICA.'T'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEP30NE: Lesny Development Co.
R ?00 Bp[p lY v:ii.. rn on211
(213) 653 -7117
MME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE
OF PERSON
TO BE CONTACTED
CONCERNING
TiiIS PROJECT:
Frank R_
Williams- Associated Engineers,
31G East "E"
Street, Ontario,
CA , 91764,
(714)986 -5818
LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AC) ASSESSOR PA -RCEL NO -)
Between Haven Ave. & Hermosa Ave., 660'+ so. of Wilson _
Assessor Parcel No.'s 201 -1 1- - 1- 14,201 -1 - C2,201- 181 -13,
201 -181- 63,201- 181 - 65,201- 181 -69.
LIST OTHER PER:•iITS NECESSARY FFr "1 LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND
FEDE R7tL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PEFL4I T S
Encroachment *-,emit from San Bernardino County Flood Control D°stML=
Department of Real Estate Public Report.
x -1
E
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: _Planred Unit Develonmert consisting o'•
27 single family homes; 81 detached patio homes; 202 attached townhouses
& a recreational area.
ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND
PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: Proiec* area = 57.70 acres cross
and 56.12 acres :net. Area of proposed bui7. = 409.,870 sq. ft.
DESCRIBE THE ENlTI=0n'fN ?AL S?=77NG OF THE PROJECT SITE
_ '-3G =? -TS TO� 's (TREES)
ANIFSALS, ANY CULTl t:L, HISTORICAL OR SCE_:IC ASPECTS, USE
OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AIM THE DESCRIPTIO'N' OF A *ZY
EXISTI_':G STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS'
The nrniect wile is vacant and clogp imifermly from north t0 (?ath It
is on the west side of the alluvial fan formed by Deer Canvon.
Thero are no t t"ictiiroq or the ci and no traFS_ The flora rnnsinte of _
native scrub plants and weeds_ The wildlife includes around rodents,
lizards, and birds common to residential areas. Deer and Coyotes occasionally.
trayerno tl.,P
There are no known cultural or historical aspects of significance.
Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series
of cumulative actions, which although individually small,
may as a whole have significant environ.- rental impact?
No.
I- 2
11
WILL THIS PROJECT:
YES NO
X 1. Create a substantial
contours?
X 2. Create a substantial
noise or vibration?
X 3. Create a substantial
municipal services (�
sewage, etc.}?
change in ground
change in existing
change in demand for
:olive, fire, water,
X 4. Create chances in the existing zoning or
general plan designations?
X S: Remove any existing trees? How many?
X 6. Create the need for use or disnosal of
potentially hazardo-s materials such as
toxic substances, flay.:- tables or explosives?
® Explanation of any YT S ansAers above: 2. A substantial increase
in noise will only occur during construction.
4 Zoning will be changed for a planned unit APVain.,,no,.«
TM= ': -A"T- If the project involves the construction of
residential units, complete the forn-i on the
next page.
CEF,TIrICA-I ioiJ: I hereby certifv that the statements furnished
above and in the attached exhibits present the data and
infornation recuired for this initial evaluation to the
best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and
information presented are true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief. I further understand that
additional infor ^ation may be required to be submitted
before an adequate evaula
Review tion can be made by the Dcvclov :,ant
Committee.
Date lilt ti Signature/
Title
2- -3
C
RESIDF4TIAL CONSTRUCTION
The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability
of the school district to accon modate the proposed residential
development.
LSSNY DEVELOPMENT CO.
Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No. :TENTATrrE TRACT No. 10826
Specific Location of Project: Between Haven Ave. & Hermosa Avenue,
660'± South of Wilson Avenue.
C
0
I -4
PHASE 1
PHASE 2
PHASE 2
PHASE 4
PHASE 5
TOTAL
NUMBER OF
T(NINHCHES
62
54
58
28
0
202
NUMBER OF
PATIO HOMES
0
37
0
44
0
81
NUMBER OF
ESTATE HOMES
0
p
0
0
27
27
DATE PROPOSED TO
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
5 -83
11-83
8 -84
5 -85
2 -86
EARLIEST DATE OF
OCCUPANCY
2 -84
11 -84
8 -85
5 -86
2 -87
0
I -4
G
lu
PLAN
NUMBER
801
802
80?
804
805
811
812
813
821
s_2
823
r,
n
I -5
MNTA' `IVE PRICE
RANGE
ASE 1
—�—�'
PHASE 3
PHASE 4
PHASE 5
—
!q$5-,O0t,-
$62,700-
$68,970-
,700
68,970
75,865
83,150
=`O-
90,200-
99,220-
109,140-
1B /Den
,
90,200
(
99,220
109,140
120,060
--
95,000-
104,500-
114,950-
126,445-
Y
2B
104,500
114,950
126,445
139,090
85,000-
93,500-
102,850-
11 2,135-
--
1B /Lib.
93,500
102,850
113,135
124,450
93,000-
102,300-
112,530-
123,780-
--
!B /Lib'
102,300
112,530
123,780
136,160
102,300-
123,780-
2E
--
112,530
136,160
121,000-
146,410-
r
3B
--
133.100
161,050
130,900-
158,390-.
3B
--
143,990
i
174,230
$ 165,440
'-
--
--
181,980
3B
--
181,54F-
3B /Den
--
--
--
--
199,77r'C
2 ;0,,3(
'-
--
--
231,91(
4B
--
I -5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PART II - INITIAL STUDY
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
APPLICANT:
FILI G DATE: i- ,z _ Tz LOG Nb-MBER:
PROJECT:
PROJECT
I. ENVIRv... ,. a•ani. 1:tr s1l.1J
(Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached
sheets).
0
YES MAYBE NO
1. Soils and reolo£y. Will the proposal have
significant results in:
a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in
geo:llogic relationships?
•G
b. Disru;.tions, displacements, compaction o-._
burial of the soil?
c. Change in topography or ground surface
contour intervals?
d. The destruction, covering or modification
of any uni;ue geologic or physical features?
/
e. Any potential increase in wind or water
erosion of sods, affecting either on or off
site conditons?
_ t
f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition?
g. Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud -
slides, ground failure, or similar hazards?
h. An increase in the rate of extraction and /cr
_C
use of any mineral resource?
2. Hvdrologv. Will the proposal have significant
results in:
11
YES MAYBE NO
a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction
of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream
channels?
b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage petterns,
or the rate and amount of surface water
runoff?
c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood
waters?
d. Charge in the amount of surface water in any
body of water?
e. Discharge into surface waters, or any
alteration of surface water quality?
f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics?
g. Change in the quantity of groundwaters,
either through direct additions or with-
drawals, or through interference wit"a an
aquifer?
Quality?
Quantity?
h. The reduction in the amolsrt of water other-
wise available for public water supplies?
�. Exposure of people or property to water
related hazards such as flooding or seiches;
3. air Quality. Will the proposal have significant
results in:
a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile
or indirect sources?
Stationary sources?
b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or
interference with the attainment of applicable
air quality standards?
C. alteration of local or regional climatic
conditions, affecting air movement, moisture
or te:cperature?
4. Biota
Flora. Will the proposal have significant results
in:
a. Change in the characteristics of species,
including diversity, distribution, or number
of any species of plants?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of plants?
1
— -f
L
c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of
plants into an area?
d- Red'_c'iCn In the otential for agricultural
p g Mural
production?
Fauna. Will the proposal have significant results
in:
a- Change in the - 'taracteristics of species,
including diversity, distribution, or numbers
of any species of animals?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of animals?
c. Introduction of nzw or disruptive species of
animals into an area, or result in a barrier
to the migration or movement of animals?
d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or
wildlife habitat?
5_ Population. Will the proposal have significant
results in:
raKa �
YES MAYBE NO
-f--
a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri-
bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of /
the human population of an area?
b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or
create a demand for additional housing?
6. SOciO- Economic Factors. Will the proposal have
significant results in:
a. Change in local or regional socio- economic
characteristics, including economic or
co:mtercial diversity, tax rate, and property
values?
b. Will project costs be equitably distributed
among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers,
tax payers or project users?
7. Land Use and Planning Considerations. Will the
proposal have significant results in?
a. A substantial alteration of the present or
Planned land use of an area?
b. A conflict with any designations, objectives,
policies, or adopted plans of any governmental
entities?
c. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of
existing consumptive or non - consumptive
recreational opportunities?
7
J
u
0
w,
r
C
Page 4
YES MAYBE NO
S. Transportati.oe Will the proposal have significant
results in:
a. Generation of substantir.l additional vehicular
movement?
—
b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for
/
new street construction?
—
C. Effects on existing parking facilities, or
/
demand for new parking?
—
d. Substantial impact upon existing transporta—
_
tion systems?
—
e. Alterations to present patterns of circula-
tion or movement of people and /or goods?
f. Alterations to or effects on present and
potential water — borne, rail, mass transit or
air traffic?
—
g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
—
9. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have
significant results in:
a. A disturbance to tae integrity of archaeological,
/
and /or historical resources?
paleontological,
10. Health, Safety and Nuisance Factors. Will the
proposal have significant results in:
a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazard?
b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards?
c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous
substances in the event of an accident? —
d. An increase in the number of individuals
or species of vector or pachenegenic
organisms or the exposure of people to such
organism.?
e. Increase in existing noise levels?
y/
—
f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous
noise levels?
—
/
g. The creation of objectionable odors?
h. An increase in light or g'_are?
C
11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal :,ave significant
results in:
-- The obstruction or degradation of any scenic
vista or view?
b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive
site?
c. A conflict with the object-ivs- of designated
or potential scenic corridors?
12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the propobal
have a significant need for nev sy =:ems, or
r-iterations to the following:
a. Electric power?
b. Natural or packaged gas?
c. Communications systems?
d. Water supply?
e. Wastewater facilities?
Z. Flood control structures?
g. Solid waste facilities?
h. Fire protection?
i. Police protection?
j. Schools"
k. Parks or other recreational facilities?
I. Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads and flood control facilities?
m. Other governmental services?
13. Energy and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal
have significant results in:
a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy?
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing
sources of energy?
c. An increase in the demand for development of
new sources of energy?
d- An increase or perpetuation of the consumption
Of non – renewable forms of energy, when feasible
renewable sources of energy are available?
Page �
YES MAYBE NO
- 1
—
L'
E
0
r
YES MAYBE NO
e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or
scarce natural resource? --
1,.. •,� d� *ery Findin¢s of Significance.
a. Does the project have the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or ani=l community, reduce
the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehist=r ?
b. Does the project have the potential to achiere
short -term, to the disadvantage of long- terc.,
environmental goals? (A short -term impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a relatively
brief, definitive period of time while long-
term impacts will endure well into the future).
c. Does the project have impacts which are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (cumulatively considerable
means that the incremental effects of an
individual project are considerable when viewed
in connection with the effects of past projects,
and probable future projects).
d. Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
II. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRON"IENTAL EVALUATION (i.e., of affirmative answers to
the above questions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures).
1 �1.
l
LI
i
ADDENDUM To ENVIRONMENTAL CHECYLIJ FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 10826
Explanation of "yes" and "maybe" answers:
1. soils and Geology
(c) substantial grading is proposed for this project that will
significantly alter the existing topography and ground surface
contour intervals. S -lopes will be kept to a minimum, and heavily
planted.
?_ Hvdroiocy
(b) Construction will increase the area covered by buildings and
paved areas which will reduce absorption rates, alter drainage
patterns and increase the amount of surface water runoff. The
proposed grading and drainage plan has been designed to direct
water to catch basins in streets that will carry water to water
conservation basin to the south.
(c) Construction of buildings and streets wiiI change direction
of flood waters. In addition to items listed above, improved
drainage courses and pipes will handle water from northerly properties.
5. Population
(a) The proposed project has an overall density of 5.4 du /ac,
which falls within the low - medium (4-8 du /ac) range of the General
Plan. However, this is significantly greater than the surrounding
existing residential development on 112 acre or greater size logs.
Therefore, the project will change the density and growth rate of
the area. To mitigate this, the project has been designed with
loo - 150 feet of setback from Haven Avenue, and substantial set-
backs around the perimeter. Landscaping will be used to soften
the visual impact of the project.
Land Use and Planning Considerations
(a) The land is currently undeveloped; therefore, any residential
development within the General Plan land Lse density range would be
a significant change to the existing land use.
S. Transportation
i l
(a, b, d, e, f, g) This project will generate increased vehcuar
traffic volumes which will effect existing streets and require new
street construction. The project could also impact existing mass
transit or other transportation systems, and potentially increase
traffic hazards. The access to the project from Haven lies north
of the signalized entrance to Chaffey College. Therefore, it is not
anticipated that conflicts would develop betwLen traffiatttempting
to cross Haven Avenue. A landscaped median with appropriate
-1-
L1
E
III. DETEMIINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
r --, I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect
on the enviso^ e:n -t, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant
px,�,effect on the environment, there will not es a significant affect
in this case because the mitigation measures described on an
attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED-
on
I find the proposed project MAv� h a significant a ect the
envirnment, and an`ENVIRONT A 1 ORT is re red.
r /7
Date
C
11
/E
n
Page J
I
Pockets will
Parking wi l 1 b further ,'educe traf
for on- street Provided ddi f,c prbjecttto Adequate street
constructed parkin wrth3" the
to City tionally' the reduce the Off-street Y Standard pavement pr�vate si errand
health, safet width for reets will be
and Nuisance a local street.
(e) The
ac
be primarijcrease in noise levels
activi i daeresiden teased vehicular
higher during c,ttraff��m prro will
ties in this
resi ential area. Noise 1 and no Ject
will be used to SetbacY,s evels will normal human
reduce ;mpacts bermin dense temporarily
and d °crease g' and landscaping
noise levels off -site.
-2-
11
0
C
pockets will further project to Adequate demand et
parking
constructed to City nStandard tpavaement width rfor ta local street. e
l�. Health. Safet and Nuisance Factors
(e) the increase in noise levels resulting
from this project will
be primarily due to increased vehicular traffic and normal human
activities iu a residential area. Noise levels will be telandscaping
higher during Con•struc`-imp impacts and decrease �noise levels off -site.
will be used to reduce imps
-2-
E
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY
APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 108 26
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 10826, hereinafter "Map"
submitted by Lesny Development Company, applicant, for the purpose of
subdividing the real property situated ir. the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a subdivision
fer a total planned development of 27 single- family homes, 8! patio homes,
and 202 townhouse units on 57.7 acres in the R- 1- 20,000 zone (R- 2 /P.D.
pending), located between Haven and Hermosa, south of Wiison, into 324
lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing
and action on June 9, 1982; and
WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map
subject to all conditions set forth in the Enqineering and Planning
Divisions reports; and
HHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the
Enqineering and D:dnning Divisions reports and has considered other
evidonce presented at the public hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga does resolve as follows:
SECTION is The Planning Commission makes the following findings
in regard to Tentative Tract No. 10826 and the Map thereof:
(a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable
int =rim and proposed general and specific plans;
(b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is
consistent with all applicable interim and proposed
general and specific plans;
(c) The site is physically suitable for the type of de-
velopment proposed;
(d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause
substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury
to humans and wildlife or their habitat;
(e) The tentative tract is not ii'.:ely to cause serious
public health problems;
(f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict
with any easement acquired by the public at large, now
of record, for access through or use of the property
within the proposed subdivision.
Resolution No.
Page 2
(g) That this project will not create adverse impacts
on the environment and a !Negative Declaration is
issued.
SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 10826, a copy of which is
attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following
conditions and the attached Standard Conditions:
PLANNING DIVISION
1. This approval shall become null and
subdivision map is not aporoved and
building permits issued when no map
within twenty -four (24) months from
this project unless an extension ha:
by the Planning Com^issior.
void if the final
recorded or
is involved,
the approval of
s been granted
2. A Community Trail shall he provided along haven Avenue
in accordance with the Equestrian Trail Plan. A
detailed trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes,
physical conditions, fencing and weed control, in
accordance with City trail standards, shall be sub-
mitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to
approval and recordation of the final map.
3. All units with a driveway apron for the garage less
than twenty (20) feet shall be provided with auto-
matic garage door openers.
4. The patio homes shall be provided with front yard
landscaping and an appropriate irrigation system,
to be installed by the developer in accordance with
submitted plans. Said front yard landscaping shall
include an average of two (2) fifteen gallon size
trees, in addition to street trees.
5. Details and typical elevations of wails and fences
shall be included in the final construction package.
6. Trees shall be planted between garage doors in the
townhouse portions of the project.
7. Directory signs shall be provided throughout the
project to the satisfaction of the City Planner,
and appropriate sign permits shall be obtained.
n
Resolution No.
Page 3
BY:
.le rey King, Chairman
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Planning Commission
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution Was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 9th day of June, 1982, by the following vote -to-
wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ENGINEERING DIVISION
8. The developer shall provide storm drain system through .
the project area within a dedicated easement to convey
storm runoff to Alta Loma Basin. The alignment and
design of the system shall be approved by the City
Engineer prior to map recordation.
9. The developer shall make provisions to accept drainage
runoff from the north by means of stubbed pipe at
locations shown on the tentative map along the north
tract boundary and connecting the same to the main
line storm drain. Other means of drainage conveyance
from the north may also be acceptable at t+ie discretion
of the City Engineer.
10. The median islands at the entrances to the project
shall be set 5 feet back of the right -of -way line.
11. The interior private streets :hall be designed with
crown sections.
12. The structural pavement sections of the interior streets
shall be designed based on public street criteria.
Collector street criteria shall be used for Street
"A" and local street criteria for all other streets.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 1982.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
.le rey King, Chairman
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Planning Commission
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution Was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 9th day of June, 1982, by the following vote -to-
wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
.1
°
C
V
V
v
i � 4
w ✓
0 C
O
L V y
„
^J9
�
CO
aJ
O
°
�
° p✓O
b `� �L
Vl1
° `"��
i
iL
�
r 4
GL
Pr-
N
iG
_
u r0. r✓
°
N
o
a
ec
-✓
o
°
L
r _��- `
mac:
N-
L
4
q
�
V
�_
l '��
N C° V l ✓
r
C° L
D O C
O
d
�
O H u
✓ u L V
u q
A d L
G
N
v.
q v
°
d C
d GC T
N
m S C ✓^
F P
°
°✓'.
� a�'G-
� G. n
vi
ono
.=c+
iy
.�m�
+
°
C
°
N
J
"
°
C
a`
rV
�
"P°
Y dN
°TP
`
q
mG�
Grp
L. .+i.
G•'
V L
J u
+
"
- C J y
O O C q C N+ �
6
V
✓ L
L
y
L b
L _
P
7d
NC d
rC�
O. 6u ti�(UV
G •
��y
L✓
V�<
-V
g`
T
VLi.
R
A=
y-
rA
�"'
..
=o�o
a� ` «�"r '°
ao
=
c
q
.L.�`a
cL qu'•Vir
iV L
F
°
�r9.
� ✓
^t LJ��{{''1✓ V
✓�6WY.
TO
C
floc
V
'0 4p
N^ t
°
`i
N
CP
r°G,
6
d
° LG
°P
��GLL
CT C
C
+
�
Y
� .°r
Ed..r
N .C° V
u ✓j
Oii
L
yV
N�
C�
1
4 POIP
W`.S°yjG c
T+
u>
h� ✓rrG
V
n�
AC
Nd
y
p Z;
L - G N
C
^ O
^C
_
60
A C
O
CDl
COC
O°
°GIG
V" buCVOr i
LL�
C=iU
Vq u
✓ L✓
42
=
_
C C
L
d'
P� ^°
C✓ C G
C V
CW
^�
� J O�
L
V
1 LTV -A� _N
AO
rC
V�
>
O
V '°
N
u✓ I
AEC TNV
r "
CV
°9
CAM
_ Np ✓
i GCX
�q0 =r
.di.✓ C9° .Ln✓
36
^ ^r.
N
C��Vr
r^
L^
" a
+
LC
C
^+`y S
d'
r 0
L
v
n
m °C��>�
GI
PN
LV
Y
J�
1 OCN
VA
dL C ✓
N
C� G
C
C
V
bC A_C
Y
CLq
`Oa
=I
y
"r V V S ' ° d
G
✓ N r
w V W✓ C
A
NO
6
W.r
O yN
WV
� � y
A
C
N
+�
li HS r.`. .i..gal
✓ +L
_
O
rC.W
COL
rz
m ^
O ^
C
G
C
V C•
a
N
d
.°r 1� � r
d
C
C V
O
1J vJi ✓
O
`Cr
q
o E O
F
N`
qo Ac
cr°
O E
as
✓.°. r
° -
y
G�W
O
Mc
rC
Z
°
a J �P
.-i.
ryFry_y C✓
G.°..
°�
G
V 6
3
O d
A C
o
Ne iLi.�O
G. C
FO°
G
y
^o
�+
L'
Vc
g $+ P
r ^^
c.°
tom.
kr
j
<=
J c
G
y
A ✓
..
r r^
2
..
o
✓cc
_�y
y.G. s g
✓
_
:a
V>
r G ✓
m
l d
C
..rV
O
✓
O
lO
G1 O
C°V
V✓
O C O C �� AO
C
T
QO
"f
"
V
Rl
O V
q
t
M N c q ^
.Gw
Q
CC)
O)
...
oa
V
V
O
�
t Q q q °
✓� p
v y O
a J i°
q O
O
A
y
q J
V n✓
_°
-mw
S N
_-
CO
°✓ NQr
> 0.°.. O° �a
60Q
CO !f`
vq�
+
L✓
rI
� O
°
? N r
°
t c.ie
V
v�
✓
a.
qN
d L
✓
�+r'c
ii
�
I
Ir1
S
.°_>
°�
� «a q
�✓
N G
GN y
N
W
Ct
C
-.°.
G
p
C V
N
CJ
e G
C
C O C °
.N ✓ m ^ q E N
✓ AC
r c
M a
Q CS
Yj
V
G
N P ^ gy m
.' r � G1 q O V
q
O 6 .... >
° G
O
L ...I
O
C
i= pVl
N
:
r
v✓ C
V
G^ 4@F
✓
.'_
.1'N
`eiia ^VN
�L
N
r
r
H> N <
r=
40i
'
6+
Y✓r
Y.W CYJ
GCNw
r.LiL
A
O r2�
V
CN
d �
a. @
.w
IVj �
�
O
yi .p n
C��11y}
a p•
�
�
O �
r
x�
i'�1 XI
xl
•
N
6y
� � XI
I
I I
�
�
X•'
<
.1
en
0
CV
2
4
O
a
N
4)
/r
Q
P
_
S
L-A ��ii�1
O
r
r
q
«
O
u r
�� q .✓ .Oi. C
C
•p
.Oi.
•�
°�
O
I
Cw
Cfi
O
P„
G
V C n
r
�
O 4
�
QO
L N
V� y
- uLdC•LLS
6•� -.Nr
wL.r
a
✓
c
q
r
u
y W+ 6 0 0
V q
..
w.+
�.
C l
i
00
r r
w0..
L y
✓
��
_
N L
rJ.
U
LRL�\i(°y qL
Cl�
iG
✓wO
wOi\
d
N >> C• O
L
O
r
E «
wC O TN d+
q
«
P
C
• O Z
•t M
q>
�
d
r ^ A .Vr.
q
C� C'�
I ✓�
L y L
q O
q
Tl lT R
q
Q 4
C= b •' O V
_
(�Y ✓
L .�
.wqq
qC
d
vq
O
NP
\
YlG
A
aq
'-O
�YN�
i
^= grN'.Li
q
�
(C(''V.H OT.
w1T
L t t�1
d�
yv rC-
O P R
i V
L c° i q
C N
� �
WT
q
«
p L+
O C
✓
M o O+
P
C � C
c W
o
•"'
� � O
i o
'O
yy��L
u G`
�.�
S
L
P„
.b.
d
N N N`).. .N.
4 L. �
L �`
y
a
q
>•
P >� F
+ - +�
w:.L`
w�
a• d �,
•,�
$ �
o.4w � v
d
gL N o
1. -y
d•.
_WLy
L.NC 2L
«V
+] C V
0✓
V
W
F6
O
iM -LS NL\
a C
7 Z P
✓
r
� - ti
L J r
� L
L � \.
y p C� k✓ O
Y M
q
4 C d
1
L L Op i C✓ V
Es,
M d
R
'J O
pS
L
yAj I
V D
L G
q
yL.
L✓ V+ L
a\� Pv
PrO IL
R
.Vi.LO R
y
t
4 Y P a u
V .� >
>> O C
.� 6
M
�
�„ �
• C O` G+
A
fO R
Vy
C
� O
L
N{{
S 0
+ �
�+
_
�PP
.V M
C O O
yE fF
p�
CE
6
A E
N
.•. p R V
qCA E
=N✓ !=C
..
PLd
C.. q
yi _
w-
dad= rT
Tq
�r ry
�
� C
N C
�
N a
N t - C S
N O
�
✓aC ° > •('''�\f V✓ O
. �
� O�
d P
•°•, � V �✓
d�� Ed
NW✓
O`+
^OI
f
y$
S�
�
Y
LS
T«r
p 1
>C Q^
N✓V
A
vp
c pR♦ u.T.� V
�ZwOi G•.Ri
hr�
42d Q6m
Hs Q
y T y
OC
L�9
+rgc_4Y
•�rC`_ +_ ✓ti >O
CIN <O
FL
Y✓
•.Zq
NO
4j\V i�NO O.
O
�•
C
P
.-.
•� N
n �
.�1I1 N
1
u
u
.�
✓ p
a
S
BL
�O
`✓ rCP
p
p,
dO
L�
C
.N
f
4gyNV �C
qY:2 w�
C\
O y=
q
y y �
� 4 y�^
N O
G P� O
T L •. .�
E
\1 dVC
OL 6y =A
O
OG
V
q r
L�
LOL
•A.
-O
ONR N
y Z ••
S N
qr
A•. L..L
✓GO ✓O�VG
P✓ qr9
qu
�¢u
O.
L „O
E
c
oo
LT
as
_��
�q r
s�G
xrn
L
✓� .°eY�
.c r
VL
4
NY
.Ld+
N>,y ti6
O�L?�'�✓ r
'C
-
T CO
O
AqU
dl
yP
✓Ay
w.r°
r
dCN
yJj
�V�
d
✓.5
E C
AUC
y°..
�
r LCV
C1
d d q
O
✓ N -
✓
>�
N
A V V L 4
L O ✓ �
Y
C O
O
a
C« v r
d_�yr
i
«
$
«
.Ln 6 �•
�' %.✓
` ..n ✓
cA+r
\
yL
-'mac«
N C
y
..y., R '. d
d�
- d CI
P T V
J•
y
L� � N N
F
y ✓V�
VC.
Q
GO
'p NCi
q
C. C
6 �p�
O ✓
A L
V•L
u
q V
P ✓
�F
y G
C
oE
E
C
+PVPLC.V�+
z
C L
iR
4y r N q
O u P
IN
•
q«
q
'
N
✓
r
4U i
N
d✓L
d`��rS «Or
O'
C C
«V C
A.
. O . 06
~>
O✓
L
= C O C C
T-,
� V O V
E
V
_ p
y✓
V
L✓
✓
Y C G
T
A C C
d
q
7
C
L r R e
= N q N
L Oh
W
N r
V G q
q N
« q
C
q O C V 4
y
C q
�j�
q
} ' O
I$ Y •°y.
PO
=RN
•9
E
G+ -5
A l rp
.•.. Cq
q
N
Gi
=Cr
V N
O
„
\ V 6r C Cd
C
M GyH
d
C
u •V..�>O
q
�� i0
r 6r
�A
O
dk A✓
S L qC
E
✓�VV
+G
.�
qL
°i�
OSL•�LSO V
qO
C
ddLO R
Ly d✓LL)q
D� +�
L
_y
L C
•�
CC L L
q✓ JggNS
.L.Ow =V
^•.�
q�
S
N
GL>.N
N
A� G
✓�N °•”'
'i• L
«^
w9
YV C
�o
,•�
_ _
6 6
N oaN
d-
r � T
K
d
°_
yd
_...L
aNp rho`
G
V•.
✓4
.Li, ✓ J
M
d
C M Q�
q>
^ C
C d=
i P
O j
C L
q✓ >
A
a
C
V G
O 9 4 L O
✓
v
`
Y
r
C q q O
n V
V
.°w
t°.! N �� R u
N w y t.q. q
[[ O
r d N
I
N
L�
+
GuM
LYRV
yy M•
NSM
L
pVq =wP
►4
q VZV
L >
N
rJN
LG OdE�GG
r
T A +
P
V NWi�
C
�C
•.: TAL ✓.�
N i G
\`
V V
y OC ✓ +j C
q� X
d L
'c �� P'gv
q
l p L
m
°RC
O
c
N
T �a
>. a,M
�
r y
R
LPVC
a
r✓ i� _c
•�\
dg9c
� �
pY
L
r A
dM
T6
PP�
rL qq�Q
P
• \
aaa��O��vvr...
LN PCq` ^'6
ZNd ✓O
3 4�.
O
C C
C O G
C ° � i
L C •� C C
L
Pq'
L N
6
9 P
N VL
VT
G
O
=
2.2
C C M `
R r
L
FOr
y
d L L R 9 q>
C
O✓
� N 6E CA d G✓
L V � l
r .� �
_ q q O� r� r
y. ✓
R V[ i
< W
6
Q O
r iv 2c
•0
64
C O a
L
4 -s
�%QCf1
)D
^l
I•I
iNCf�1
I
_C�}1j _�PJII
_
N
Q
Y.
weA
Q1
1
1
1
-�1j
li
a
N
4)
/r
IL L
��
O4
V 4
P ✓
O C
NI
�� a
qc
n:
-�
_✓
°��✓eu
z
cz
C
Y
••o••d'+°
cP
Q
6
•• V
C C
d L
O n
LA V A
i
S
O
N C
= p
r�
Y A K
r V N y
�
V�
J
^
y 0
G.
U 1 G C
C V' P
N
r L
ry Pte•
[ = A
R C N
L q 4�
P
y C
L O
✓ C O Q✓
�
f{
I `
''
V Y
p
O Y L✓
v
d V a
.W. P
° m° i
c✓
r
= p
O
1!
=
d
iVG N OV
O L yC
Jw
�+
t:.2
s r✓
c
U 9 d V a
V 'n_.
C L
W
C P = C 'T
C
C`
C � L O
d
C
9� r
Z a y
• L
L�
N N
d i m P C
>
W
V
� �
Y
11 ✓
I
« �
n
T a d L
=J}
A y
`
E' ✓
A
v
9} L P
M q
. o
11
V N A
_
-
i J
a�q c N
d L
c o E
LLC �v
�
�� c
_ WL`
\6-P
L
nr�
LN
q _
-
-•�
I
qC
V C L ;7 T
J K q q
A
T
q✓
V y C � q P
O
� G^ N
^
✓ q Y'r
r�
u✓ m A
iS
. O
P
�' a
N
_
P
o-L
l r r
L ✓�v
ANr
T N C�
L` b
N
n
`
-bdv
v
�
� e
N
L.+«
E
`c
`.
- A
and
� {+
odm
.A•
Ao
�
— M
N
�
S
.� O
G1
1 _
I
I
P
L Z
C A A
✓ a
L
H Y
N G 6 2
V Y
�
I
s
L m O G=
r A
S N
•- q L
V C
y G
� � O d
-1
°
u ✓c
L d-
va✓
doc��
i L
nN
2
c c- i
v i t
OPa°.
e Ai Cu
�Cr
d4�
.� O
q�}
✓r
`uL
Cr0 C
Gr
LSO
qA
WAC✓
rNCO
O
C -�.
�
GOO
q I
^�
'-t
T TL i�
Lp�
--�
CO
WU'�.
6ir
�•- L �
N
I
�YL
z � L -
H
`
e� J
A�
Niu °
rAicL
oA
✓
`x�✓
>
�N
Ar
`
��u Ib..
o
.°. '
L e
o� u
Nc r ��
N
� J
-m
..• c
�
'A
u✓ q L
CA
AGO
C_ Ly
l ^'-��
r.• r µ A
A' yE
V
�• A•- �((
ne
LNC nC
q y
ASV
uOCVL
W
L�C2
°v
� rn
Oi
�
VMU ✓�✓
�
Tr
c -
L ry
uir
-n
� 1
v"L.
ab ✓2
0
dap c
W:
dd
✓ ✓✓ _
.- `
..
E n
N t
d!`
✓... Ly -✓
m
> air
�LN
G✓
6✓
u � ✓ud
a�
Ei
6
m°a} L
�
-
L..
O 1
._^
d � a .-• M�
C N
r C�
r y y
d
O
b
b
P J}
N
'! - C
P
N ✓ C
'I
�
�T ✓
6A
0 Ly`
qOL
C--Y
>O
YL L
L'� V�
-.0
V
'
-• -C
?��P
L
J
d!M
=dfrr
a�
CJi d
W V�
O
I ^
C=L
_ p✓
NV�C N p✓
�d°
N �Nr
i9 ✓A
COL
Gq °V'Or
= C.
^
C
r
Q
4
�Jy
ij
Y
i-
v PL
F_
oN
L
L
PV E
� 6.0 L
V
q
V
O
U d
`Lb
C L C O� �• f
r
`
^
�I
�
C
N ... �
q L
V V M1 Q V V✓
°CLJ
� O
G r L
`A✓
D
� v O mI
r N
N O O T C
_
LI
L
°q
ay
1 0
LO
�
q >O
P
qV
l^�
N
J V 9
nCV
6
C J A
r 4«
V >
✓
✓
I I L
C—
7 L n
r` C P✓ N O
} >
N
V O✓
G V L
y
G SI 6
LL A v
Q N° L .O
T
f
r
� C' V +r• G O n
J 9
V
� y
i V
L`
C (c
I I !
VprV GN GA
�L
< A
L
V
C
V
rN ��
GO
O�
V
6q
Yp✓
0
O
_✓ L L_ - N
C' 4
'
C O
N O
C
✓ q
q
N
C
C
(J
V
6 l L
•S
q
^J
L
_ .Ji, .° _
V
O✓
O --
^`�
1 J N
q�,•
N2L
L`OC�sOgCO
�pG
q�q-
PV
_
C
`-
C
OL
d V°
�
C V O
O O m
M
O ✓_ T
V
r� N r � .U+ ✓
C E O
y
O.
u
` V
�e >�m
-
✓}
.�
.°.. 2_�
=3f"�r
-✓
pu-
r u
-_�✓
L
_
_TV
c
:ro
L
u
-
__
dq5L
C
1O V
O
v
' i`o 5
cv q
-
or✓
N oT.- o
� To
o
L P
L
`o
`d% q`u>
L .:.L- - d
�_�
`Q!
\'.. °'
i °�"-
z c
-
r
t
�
`ma
L GLr r_"
�c a
C
c✓
_
c
L
^O
_u
pV
GVLNC
S�NO
2 ✓ d
N`
O
O
O
--
r
OU ✓_L �`�A�..O
yNgC
GN
✓`-C
L 7
a�
✓E'
hu N
r
Yom`
C L
C ✓V
P
�
e
�
�
r -
2SC
r
iJ �G
V
✓VV
V
g
^
Odm
Q��•
L L
47
VO
SV
_ q`✓ O N
V� ✓CCU
�G�f�L� +L�
✓E a
'.d
✓q>
J
SO
AOC
LL9
�Cy
` ✓�`m
�N V
`O�r
�N
�
4
nC_
aN
T.L.•
C
�A
�L��
^•_C
✓V
uJ L`
Y> G
�
C
CU
nt
`
Y
`
N L1.N
V6
�
P
W
4
= C
E O
>___C`Npq
M C� u• d PC P
4
='�
_
op p�
v�
NL
W
rE
N-�Q
cN
�A
�Y �P
"•
✓m^
y
PAC CL
aN7✓
L
VA
`
NP
p �� ✓O �NL V�
T�NC
U �5
OU
dC
C
V
LE
CN
G
U�
OCC rO�V
2JL✓
9A L
Oj
.6C
€��
�%
�
V
L
JC
O 9 n s a d V
n
_
O
r
�
g 0
4. �>
^ _ C
�%
�
4✓
�
=
A U G N
O t P
C
.G..
D
ari i� u✓
C3�Y
LG ^d
OI
_
S�q
CEO
Lj L•'
L
Lfi
=h
70Lr YN
JLC'
.��
C
N✓ C
✓>
A rev
a
L
V_V
E
✓ i- L L �
C V y
C
�
�
q
�
V �.
r.
r`
V
L
L
✓G.T.
a`i"
Ev
'� •L/ ✓
a
O d b V
O C d
d
q
', =`��✓
L
c� -
✓>
-
uD
}2C
ST )
n�l
:.i
O ON
Cam✓
A
O•✓q
�
✓
AN 2 ✓V V�
�
�LV
p
%
T 9A�a
CAT
N
L
Cpl
VA
N
�d
eEe�B= > •_•�
LA °N
-
-
No
�co
eM
=
c
Lb o -
oq
Q✓mc Noo.
_
.Nngv
�
M
-°
SV G
°
r b �✓
N i .�C. L
Y-
r L 6
G N _� L �� l
c V y
.n N
r°
` L-
. p
? 9
� �
L. y r N N C A
G
V`�
VY ✓
U
A
-a
JJ
pPj
GYV
OGSm
>�L
�Y
yY✓
'L
>IC DA
y
P
C_
V
!.l
��VA�.- L•vO•rN V�
CF 4A
?WOn
�
C LA
�.O`V
.°. �
�9U
L• nL
✓cr Aac.d�.A.
G
NrVg
V _�
L��
L
J_
F
✓
�`r L2 VC��O
N J
� 7 d V
J
Q
9`OV
� d e r
•..•
L =� 6 V �✓ d. 4
S_ a L �
^ m T �
Y
�-
d L d-
\
� a N
V i >
J, C L
N_
� C
N V
~«
'V
C
GJO
G y
� O
WN
WJ
Y�
pA SS! ✓LL VL
rib
�•
N••
40
^i
6
aJC LO
LCCGV
N
d,
IL L
col
�.j
C '
U
V
O
4
d �
d
✓�
�
4
4
y
7
0
P
r
N l
r
r
J
C
V
�
_—i•• C 4 O
1
�
�
�
r 9
�
l 1
7-u
I[
v
9
9 L
1I 4 C�
L
1'
L •9 .Lr
L. _
P
9 C
O
['
r
C
_�
01
1
V q
•L
r V i
cz
oCD.I
L
9 l
L
D
= i
d
d
N
V_ q
N L
r r°. E
C
t.
•• C N
V
r A
� L v
�
�
d
09
t.V
6L
I
rL
ar
VY
A N
V:
r
V
O
Si
9 z
a N
q
6
� (
W
^✓
C
M_ i t
N
A
d
NyY C
'VVa
°ZO
(
>
LI
L
S
9
w O I
= 9
V w.
R= N d
I
9
�
r
9��r� OI
7 9
99�
V N
A GL P.
1
Z
q
-'✓
°„ V
=
rJN
Or
VY.
v_G
I I
Jr
qN
f�N
�` Y
V��
GY
AO
CO 7�\
I
^✓v
VY
y qN
nd
T=
�
1 9
V�
°
A�•i
9
C
C l> W
I I
L
V
�J
..� MA
�V
1
C
r�
ct
°i
O
P
Y
W
C
W
J
I WI�
u•r
•-
d V
2
I O
I
L
C
C
V
J
V
I
�
.�
.°.
I I
zN
°'
r"L
_i
I
c
qr.:
O
..
�
G
I
L
V
�N
1 -�
x }�'
1V¢
L+Cr
`.1
nV
Or
Lam°
_�
O
VrT.
L a L
.�✓
a u
4
P
E
1
>PC�
w>O
9d
L° AL
L9Y
qL .s
^I
1
.9r0
r
C�
UC
y
_VJ•y
¢ N
F
.• y
°.
✓ y
X
q
i
Y U O
C
y
2—
N a0..
L
d G
d
^
N .�..
L=
yd V r
r_ V i
.� >
0
v
L C V
`
>..4
o0
y..
r
4v
'Z
�o
oz' cc
°a
� C
.°.
fEuj
G� qj
f
N
!d
N
i
ip
r N¢
1
C r
C
w
II
72
O L A
C C L .�
W
`
=
G uL�
QPN L
9r•+_
YV
PE
�u
� V1I
O
O
C=
_ Jam_
wLL
M1�
N9 YL
iV C
GI
'�I
Pte.
gVr�P
�1'+G�
��uVV
dr
zG
`=
L j
rOQ
9
_
L O
L
N
P9
N
N
Y
C V `=
O
V L
F8
p
fF.� _
ri
&
i
Sy
Lrn'^
V
E 0�
_Y
O¢
t t
V
L 9
q
C
OI O J
c c
9` r v
l S
V
2
Q W
V r
G l V
1t1I
E
I
'f{��jJ�]jI1j1
C N V
I
NIL °r
m
n
m P
_
NJ
W
v
d
n
X7
1 (J
Ri
I xl
.nl I
I
t
�'r
:n
I
�i
0
Ln
U
V
G
U
�
r
VO�LVV
d V _
O
'7i
N
V
q
i
G 1
9 L
f�
at L' V
uc��
rcE
4
r q
r T
G
_
_• L
9
:O i
b� �
�
9
y 9
u6
UC'
Nu
XN N
yG � t L
u Z
ac
L
ma��^�
>do
V O L C 4
n
vU�J
- l•
d Gs
Ln
T
d V _
_
_• L
9
:O i
b� �
�
9
y 9
f
, u
vU�J
pLC
d Gs
'
�.
�o
�l
v
S
�9r
.o. ai✓
6
C
Cr d V
W
s N
v
r d
dD M
Y�VJ.
L
II•^J
9
V
�
M�
p N
NLd
¢${
I""
� °rte
s� TLJV
T
N
d�
Vrd
�
u T
o
o_o
La o_cd
•F °
�o
G_Ur9
O 9
C.+E9
°rr
rJ9
_
=
ruO6
t
y
S J
rJ C r V
O G
d d
d
S� �
r J 7 .Ge ✓
✓=
d
i
V 9
G� W_
tQiV PNO
r.uLV 'Ti
V1
EV
yr Gu
CI �
OutiO
O
_I
�GS'�
�J
LNd�
G-9
!,I
co uo
v <�n
yLCo
^v
1
qP_r
LZ-5
S
^
14
N
ZI
2
Ln
9 RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT NO. 82 -03 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN
THE ZONING FROM R- 1- 20,000 TO R- 2 /P.D. FOR
57.7 ACRES LOCATED BETWEEN HAVEN AND HERMOSA,
SOUTH OF WILSON - APN 201 - 181 -12, 13, 14, 02,
63, 65, and 69
WHEREAS, on the 12th day of April, 1982, an application ::as
flied and accepted on the above - described project; and
WHEREAS, on the 9th day of June, 1982, the Punning Commission
held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the
California Government Code.
SECTION 1: The Rancno Cucamonga Planning Commission has made
the follo -ring findings:
1. That the subject property is suitable fcr the uses
Permitted in the proposed zone in terms of access,
size, and compatibility with existing land use in
the surrounding area;
® 2. The proposed zone change would not have significant
impact en the environment nor the surrounding
properties; and
3. That the proposed zone change is in conformance
with the General Plan.
SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found
that this project will not create a significant adverse impact on the
environment and recommends to City Council the issuance of a Negative
Declaration an June 9, 1982.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the
California Government Code, that the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
recommends approval on the 9th day of June, 1982,
Planned Development No. 82 -03.
2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the
City Council approve and adopt Planned Development
No. 82 -03.
11
� ayc c
3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related
material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission
shall be forwarded to the City Council.
4. All conditions of approval applicable to Tentative
Tract No. 10826 shall apply to This Planned Development.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 1982.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Jeffrey King, Chairman
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Planning Commission
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular :meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 9th day of June, 1982, by the following vote -to-
wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONEPS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
n
LJ
El
\J
El
CT Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Ct� ^^T�3ti
STAFF REPOPX _- '
L•
O
� V
r VVV
DATE: June 9, 1882
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: HAVEN AVENUE MEDIAN DESIGN
BACKGROUND: At the April 14 meeting the Planning Commission mission recommended
planting Jacaranda trees. Because the Rancho Cucamonga Women's Club was
largely responsible for the existing median landscaping, staff met with
the women's Club to receive their input on the future median improvements.
ANALYSIS: Some Women's Club members had concern that Jacaranda trees may
freeze. The Jacaranda is fair>> hardy after maturity; young Plants are
tender below 25 degrees F. Howeve,_ many trees are susceptible to frost
or freezing at young ages. The piant:ng of good stock trees can mitigate
this concern.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission review
and consider all material and input regarding this item and make a re-
commendation to the City Council.
fullv submitted,
City Planner
RG /DC /Jk
Attachments: April 14, 1982 Staff Report
ITEM I
CITE' OF MANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 14, 1982
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: HAVEN AVENUE MEDIAN DESIGN
Related File - Development Review No. 80-34
BACKGROUND: In accordance with Conditions of Approval, the Lesny Develop-
ment Company has prepared landscape and construction plans for the Haven
Avenue median island, Exhibit "A ". This median will "set the tone" for the
entire length of Haven Avenua. Because of the importance of this median as
a community design element, staff is seeking Planning Commission review and
consideration of the proposed design.
The existing "median" consists of Cypress trees and Pyracanthe shrubs. A
stamped concrete pattern resembling alluvial granite stone is proposed for
the median landscape. An actual sample will be available at the Planning
Commission meeting. The proposed landscaping plan, Exhibit "B ", imitates
15 gallon size Canary island Pine trees planted in an informal linear
pattern. The trees will be urderplanted with Indian Hawthorne shrubs.
ANALYSIS: Roadways serve as focal points for a community. Euclid Avenue
is an important Community Design element for the City of Upland. The Rancho
Cucamonga General Plan contains policies for medians:
"Landscaping should be scaled according to the
size of the roadway and the importance of the
route. Major views from the roadway should be
enhanced and emphasized by the landscaping."
ITEM F
Haven Avenue Median Design
Planning Commission Agenda
April 14, 1982
Page 2
The parkway tree planting guidelines of the General Plan propose larqe
columnar evergreens to reflect the rural history and the image of Euclyptus
windrows. The guidelines also encourage planting the same species, and in
the same pattern, for the entire length of a street or throughout an entire
area. However, the General Plan makes no recommendations as to the type
or tree variety to be used in the median.
However, concern has been expressed by the Commission regarding Canary
Island Pine trees as being representative of our rural ';isto -y avid the
Eucalyptus windrow heritage. Therefore, staff has cons% :c` =d a detailed
analysis of 75 street trees, suitable for this area Lach tree was
reviewed in terms of the following criteria:
1. Low maintenance;
2. Moderate to fast growth rate; and
3. A tolerance for drought, heat, smog, and %4nd.
Attached, as Exhibit "C ", is a list of trees meeting these criteria that
would be appropriate for median planting.
The City encourages the use of special landscaping treatments on Special
Boulevards, such as readily- available alluvial rock. Incorporating rock -
scape into landscaping conserves water and energy. The proposed stamped
concrete has the following advantages over hand - placed alluvial rock:
1. Easier and faster to install;
2. Costs approximately one -third as much; and
3. Has a consistent, uniform appearance.
DESIGN REVIEW COWITTEE: The Design Review Committee has reviewed the
proposed median design and gave a favorable recommendation to the use of
stamoed concrete. The Committee had no specific recommendations as to the
use of Canary Island Pine trees for Haven Avenue.
OPTIONS: The following options are available to the Commission:
1. Approve the median, design concept as presented.
2. Require modification to the median design with
regard to tree type. If this option is chosen,
the Planning Commission should provide the designer
and staff with direction as to desired changes.
11
Haven Avenue Median Desion
Planning Commission Agenda
April 14, 1982
Page 3
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended chat
consider all material and input regarding
options presented herein.
Respectfully submitted,
RICK GOMEZ
City Planner
RG:DC:kep
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Landscape and
Exhibit "C" - Tree List
1
the Planning Commission review and
this item and select one of the
Construction Flan
11
C'-1
y
�-
., ��•
� �.
I i, ' ..'
Z
N
I
11
.4FV.EtGA/� MDIrA OVLtCIH'
INgwN Iwync,rNG : 6eL-
a.�N/ !' eG. r�rwlawwrrd a9rr.N6 .
rav ro ^cw..R er<.acau � ♦wvro
' ♦r rare � 't..NnN�. '
Q.?�'(�ttiG % Lor�7criOh PLvh� 1�
CITY OF rm%l: =kxv6w _a AO'�i�
RANCHO CU AMONGA TrmEt2N* M&Tw!! _ I*
PLANNIl r., DIVLSIQN EXHIMT :_ &SCALE:
Ll-
11
EXHIBIT "C`
TREES SUITABLE FOR MEDIANS
Deciduous
Common
or
Evgreen
er
hame
Italian Alder
D
Silver Dollar Gun
E
E
Desert Gum
-
Semi D
3acaranQ�
Crape Myrtle
D
Flaxleaf Paperbark
E
Pink Melaleuca
E
E
Cajeput Tree
Chinese PlOtiria
E
Canary Island Pine
E
London Plane Tree
D
Chinese Scholar Tree
D
Botanical
Name
Alnus Cordata
Eucalyptus Polyanthomos
E. Rudis
Jacaranda Acutifolia
Lagerstroemia Indica
Melaleuca Linariifolia
M. 1lesophila
M. Quinquenervia
?hotin-a Serrulata
Pinus Canariensis
Platanus Acerfolia
Sophora Japonica
C'
H
0
0
0
0
0
H
I
n
I
0
0
(I
L
City of Rancho Cucamonga
San Bernardino County a California
June 1982
®
HAVENYOOD RANCH
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
CALIFORNIA
PREPARED FOR:
LESNY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
BY:
iTHE
REYNOLDS
ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP
LAND PLANNERS/
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS
CIVIL ENGINEERS
LARRY JACK WOOD
®
ARCHITECT
f
JUNE 1982
t
PROJECT INFORMATION
RECORD OWNER /SUBDIVIDERS:
Woodhaven Properties
8200 Wilshire Boulevard
Beverly Hills, California 90211
(213) 653 -7117
CONSULTING TEAM:
LAND PLANNING
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
CIVIL ENGINEERS
ARCHITECTS
u
L
P
I
Lesny Development Company
P.O. Box 5526
Beverly Hills, California 90210
Chandan Oas
(213) 653 -7117
The Reynolds Enviroranental Group
4320 Campus Drive
Newport Beach, California 92660
H. Ernest Reynolds
Paul V. Edwards
(714) 557 -1050
Associated Engineers
316 East "E" Street
Ontario, California 91761
Frank Williams
(714) 986 -5818
LJ
1
:1
j
1
Larry Jack Wood
4671 Webb Canyon Road
Claremont, California 91711
■
Larry Wood
(714) 624 -4410
LJ
1
:1
j
1
V.
� k
� �
tow
ul
iO A
A
r
r i
! co
I .' r.
J
Introductimor,.
Location
Havenwood Ranch contains about 56 acres within the north - central portion of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga in southwestern San Bernardino County. The San
Gabriel Mountains rise behind the site to the Angeles and San Bernardino
National Forests -- and provide a visually dramatic backdrop to the project.
Rancho Cucamonga and the surrounding communities of Upland, Ontario, and
Fontana arF, part of one of the largest remaining areas within the Los Angeles
Metropolitan Area.
I
-2-
Land uses immediately surrounding Havenwood Ranch includes Chaf fey College to
the east and relatively new residential areas to the south, west, and north.
Vacant land directly south of the site is proposed for low- medium density
residential development, and already contains c major flood control facility.
Land directly north is planned for single family residential development
and, at the corner of Hermosa and Nilson Avenue, an elementary school.
Site Character
The site has a "T" configuration -- extending for 690 feet along Haven and
Hermosa Avenues along the east and west, respectively, and to within 800 feet
P,
of 8anyon Street on the south and 650 feet of Wilson Avenue on the north. The
is
property currently identified by the County Assessor as Parcels 201- 181 -2,
12,13,14,63,65,69, and 79.
Topographically, the land ranges from elevation 1770 t. elevation 1680 -- this
90 feet of relief being a relatively constant sloping plane tilted from north
(high point) to south. There are no steep slopes or geologic features of the
site that pose major limitations to the planned residential developmert.
I
-2-
The property is currently vacant with a natural growth of scrub plants and
weeds. There are no significant trees or structures existing on the site.
i
It has no known cultural or historical significance, and is not believed to
`
possess any special value as wildlife habitat. Along the southern edge of
the project a flood control water conservation channel /basin carries inter-
mittent seasonal flows from east to west into what is known as the Alto Loma
Drainage.
i
r
a
-3-
`
I
I
I
SLrmary and Character
Havenwood Ranch is proposed as a view - oriented Planned Unit Development (PUD)
of 310 homes, with related private roads, recreational and open space amenities.
A11 aspects of the design -- from overall street pattern and architectural
character to details such as fencing and choice of trees -- have been care-
fully selected to complement one another and bend with the surrounding community.
As illustrated on the following page, the Site Plan has a cohesive theme reflecting
a 6 -part program designed to:
1) Create a balanced community o-` 3 housing types attuned to various ages,
family sizes, and socio- economic conditions;
2) Provide large setbacks and landscaped transitions to major streets and
existing /proposed land uses, including residential areas and schools;
3) Mot units and contour -grade the site in a *canner to preserve as much
as possible the natural terrain ar- maximi7e the number of homes with "
views;
4) Create through landscaping, mounding, and use of materials, a woodsy
cool and shady -- yet spacious- appearing -- setting. A blend of ever-
green and colorfully deciduous trees, and coordinated streetscape elements
intended to a;ve a sense of quality and nezghbnrhocd identification;
5) Provide a system of common greenbelts, trails, and walks -- along with
a curvilinear street system -- to provide visual interest and view
corridors wherever possible; and
6) Provide homeowner operated /maintained recreational facilities -- in-
cluding a large recreation center (swimming /wading pools, spa, rest -
roons /showers, 68Q's, and tennis /basketball courts) and 3 smaller
spa!tot lot facilities conveniently spaced within the project.
-4-
U
1
n
Residential Details i
The net residential area of Havenwood Ranch encompasses 9.8 acres, with 33.8
acres of open space and 14.1 acres of street improvements (i.e., streets,
driveways and guest �,�r� :.. � .�,_ total g- r-••••••y bays -- �•c i�ia� project containing 57.%_ acres. I
The 'Estate Homes area ;contains 1.3 net acres in the northwest portion of
the site, along Hermosa Avenue asid closest to the proposed elementary school. I
The Patio Hanes 3.3 net acres are located in the central and south portion
of the site; while the Townhomes 5.2 net acres are on the northeast portion of
the site and also extend southerly east of the Patio Homes.
A major meandering road (Street "A ") is the central spine tying the site to-
gether and providing access from both Haven and kennosa Avenues. Secondary
circulation loops within the various home areas intersect with this spine,
Providing continuous and easy access to all units. All interior streets and
driveways are proposed to be privately owned /maintained, with adequate ease-
ments for all public utilities /services.
Considerable parking is provided for homeowners and guests -- the Plan shows
an overall parking ratio of 2.9 spaces /unit, with guest parking evenly dis-
tributed throughout the various housing areas.
The Community Recreation Complex is centrally - located at the intersection of
Streets "A ", "C", and "E ". The many walks and multi -use trails lead to this
facility, providing convenient non - vehicular access in addition to provisions
for parking.
I
-5-
on "
3 t
p • a
'anti -' b a,� «°.'a�lrro •�, i ! s. 4� - '
r y �• G O
/.' . �. a fi Cf �.: • ..� s!: A� e
ar %:a . 9� «u1 s ix . I[GUi` �o ct "L: a ,•
N r
� �� a ` °�._, �^ ° i :$.- '1 1 '��•! i ;ai'�1 ,� �%:. �� �6�'� ` .
q ���t• 4 P r l)r
CARE
CjE
pool
Ll
'..'C a � ..- ° n � • •Rl q - Oj
1`
b � 11 FO
_ •— -- � � � i�:�+ �••lnS+ -:IK.c r. ��.c�"w�...ac: �i14. =:v�. i..r,:.u•
w t
To create a cool and shady "village" image, the site crust project this
feeling to those viewing in. The appeal is not only for future residents,
but neighboring residential areas and Chaffey College.
The plan provides a sense of "arrival" or "distination" along Haven Avenue ■
as shown on the adjacent page. Extensive landscaping, textured paving,
mounding, decorative fencing and wails at the project entrance create a
soft green edge, with a rural country character which is carried into and
throughout the site. Along the.east side of Haven Avenue, a 10- foot -wide
equestrian trail and a 5 -foot meanderi g pedestrian trail is consistent
with the City's General Plan.
I
I
F
P.
L•'
I
H
P
sz.�aaow �aa�ara+.�orrr+.�.+n.w OdU
ow.- .waaoru.��wa war. «o.e+.�m+ WI �(��`l��{ \VQ /!J� ^n1 /(��yO,�" (('�� {/(���( \lQ /�M dnaig v *muo4"0IDw��YOwitY�ru4� H3 V v lJ a O O U l: H3 \11/ U Il
i
I
Y
A'
t
I
}
a�.
} r`''.a�:'
'� k� i,., • r �
.:� '
Y
nor
r
i
I
Y
A'
t
I
}
a�.
S
, Is
YSS
w
Luul
QQ
0
J
5
9
yi
} r`''.a�:'
'� k� i,., • r �
.:� '
nor
Y.
:j
�S.
cc
r�
S
, Is
YSS
w
Luul
QQ
0
J
5
9
yi
E
I
I
The construction of Havenwood Ranch is expected to be phased over four years
largely to reflect:
-- Economic considerations of market absorption (i.e., the rate at which
people can be expected to purchase homes within the project); and
-- Engineering considerations of grading and road construction, especially in
cooperation with adjacent landowners and any improvements to be made to
Haven and Hermosa Avenues.
As shown on the "Phasing /Detailed Site Plan ", the phasing concept for Haven-
'
wood Ranch moves from east to west -- beginning with the Townhomes adjoining
Haven Avenue and culminating with the Estate Homes adjoining Hermosa Avenue.
It is projected to follow a five step sequence:
Step 1:
iImprove
Vie Street "A" entry from Haven Avenue, Courts "K ", "L ", and N" and
also begin construction of Loop "B ". Begin construction of a required land -
scaped median within Haver, Avenue and related trail improvements. The date
proposed to begin construction for the 62 Townhom -s is May of 1983, and the
date of first occupancy is February of 1984.
Step 2:
Continue westerly improvement of Street "A" to Street "E ", improve Street "E"
and portion of Street "D", and also Courts "C ", "D ", "N ", 110112 "P", "Q ", and "R ".
The date proposed to begin construction of the 54 townhomes and 37 Patio Homes
is November of 1983, and the date of first occupancy is November of 1984. The
Community Recreation Complex, including tennis /basketball courts and multi -use
trails will be constructed in this step.
I
I
I
I
Step 3: 1
Continue westerly improvements along Street "A ", improve the remainder of
Loop "B" and begin improvements on Loop "A". Also, improve Courts "u ", "H ",
"I ", and "J". The date proposed to begin construction of the 58 Townhomes
is August of 1984, and the date of first occupancy is August of 1985.
Step 4:
Continue improvements along Street "A ", improve the remainder of Loop "A"
and Street "D ". Also imorove Courts "A ", "B ", and "F ", and all internal
multi -use trails. Complete grading and construction of the 28 Townhomes and
44 Patio Homes. The date proposed to begin construction is May of 1985, and
the date of first occupancy is May of 1986.
Ste 5:
Complete improvements of Streets "A" and "B ", Court "U ", and trail improvements
along Hennosa Avenue. The date proposed to begin construction of the 27 Estate
Homes is February of 1986, and the date of first occupancy is February of 1987.
Because it is not possible to precisely project the rate at which homes will
be purchases between Step 1 and Step 5, the proposed year and month fcr
completion of each step are preliminary estimates and may be adjusted in
light of changing circumstances.
I
I
4
rr^
i
r�;_j���
s _ e
w c
.d m• � m 4
� . t
0� > _
� Om
L�L'll
1 �
n
Ili 4
r
x cat
x xsx
A
1�
p
IS
t
F
A 4p m Ifm
F@
I
A
k
R
R..�
f
,
A
k
R
R..�
The "Conceptual Landscape Plan" for Havenwood Ranch is intended to lend five
major environmental qualities to the planned community.
First_ when entering the project from Navin Avenue, there will be a feel of
"openness" suggested by the choice and placement of particular types of street
trees, open decorative fencing and a variable 90 -foot -deep setback of Town -
homes from the Haven Avenue right -of -way. By using pines and mounding between
the decorative wall and homes, a visually soft buffer for noise attentuation
will be created along Haven Avenue.
Secondly, entrances at Haven and Hermosa Avenue are designed to provide an
appearance of
"exclusivity" through
the use of textured paving and accent
trees planted
ir. the medians and on
both sides of each entry. Accent trees
will also be
incorporated elsewhere
in the site plan -- for example, to
specifically indicate the entrances to different housing types. I
Thirdly, particular transparent tree types are proposed to be compatible with
thr view corridors along Street "A" to maintain the spacious feeling and take
full advantage of the 10 per cent sloping land to optimize views from the
homes.
Fourthly, surface drainage is treated to capture its full amenity potential
by using on -site cobble within the streambed system and building a riparian
character with unmewn turf and native trees found "naturally" along streambeds.
Finally, the palette of trees used throughout, the 'three housing areas will
create a cool, shady, yet spacious setting. Sidewalks and multi -use trails
will meander in and among these trees which provide a canopy of changing
intensities of filtered sunlight.
':n conclusion, a Homeowners Association will he created to maintain and t
protect the quality which the private roads, landscaping, recreational
amenities and open space represent. Homeowner fees will be set to maintain
high standard of "appeal" as perceived by the future resident--, adjacent
I
andowners, and the City of Rancho Cucar,:onga.
-g-
1
ll
_i
.1�
.1.
uy
,I