HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983/06/23 - Agenda Packetc r
1
s
L
1 .
va.
✓l u'1
i1`•
t
f
+�
of
F.I.
.. ]
[P
<
y(M
t
. M
1
ji
r
GL.Cn t;nN V/
.ZO oy i;'TY OF
Rey Na-iO OiCALIONGA
z AGENDA
WEDNESDAY June 22, 1983 7:00 P.M.
1977
LION' S PARK COI' UNITY CMUEER
9161 BASF' LINE, RANCRO CUCA- MOIIGA, CALIFORNIA
i w
IL Ron Call
Commissioner Barber _
Commissioner Juarez
Commissioner McNiei��
IIL Announcements
IV. Approval of Minutes
Igap 25, 1983
June 8, 1983
Commissioner Rernpel
Commissioner Stout
V. Public Hearings
The following items are public hEarfngs in which co.. ^.cerned
individuals may voic:: the_r opinion of the related project.
Please wait to be recoanized by the Chairman and address the
Commission by stating your nave and address. All such opi ns
sha11 be Limited to 5 minutes per irviividual for each Project'
A. ENVIRONY_ iV'1'AL -- �` "• oosfd
FARKING STANDARI»
61.0219 b 7 , esitial Parking Stadanrds, cf the }Zancr
Rd3m o
Cucamonga Interim. Zoning Ordinance.
B. EN VMU14,nriiy l fLL, rw...n+•• -�• -- - --- _ A tOL3i
TRACTS 12318 & 12318 -1 - LBWIS HOMES
residential development o ?0 single am attached
dwellings on 74 lots ranging from 3100 sq. ft. to 6750 sq. ft.
on 9.5 acres of land, generally located on the east side of
Havea Avenue, north of Derr Creek Channel - APN
1077 -091 -10.
Planning Commission Agenda -
June 22, 1983
Page 2
C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE
TRACTS 12364 & 12364 -1 - LEWIS HOMES - A total
residential development of 71 single fa-mUj detached homes
on 71 lots ranging from 4600 sq. ft. to 11,590 sq. ft. on 1.4.4
acres of land, generally located on the south side of Base
Line, east of Deer Creek Channel - APN 10:7 - 091 -02.
7, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 7944
- WESTLAND VENTURE - A division of 5.06 acres o land
mto 3 parcels within the C -2 zone located on the north side
of Base Line,twest of East Avenue - APN 227- 131 -45, 47,
48.
E. REVISIONS OF CONDITIONS FOR PARCEL MAP 7349 -
LEWIS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - Located on the north
side of 4th Street, east side of I -15 rreeway - APN
229 - 283 -49.
VL Director§ Reports
F. STATUS UPDATE ON THE FOLLOWING:
CONDITIONAL USE PEAMTf 82 -15 - MANNELLA
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82 -27 - LESLIE do INFANTE
VIL Public Comments
This is the time and place for the general public to address
the Commission. Stems to be discussed here are those which
ea sot already appear on this agenda.
VUL Adjo urtment
The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations
that set an 22 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that
-are, they stall be heard only with the consent of the Commission.
VICINITY' MAP
*NfARIG MTERNAMw<t AM! r
CT" OF RANCHO CUCAUO""
1.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Regular Meeting
May 25, 1983
CALL TIER
The meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held at the
Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, was called
to order at 7:02 p.m, by Chairman Berman Rempel. He then led in the pledge of
allegiance.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: CONASISSIONERS:
David Barker, Addie Juarez, Larry Mc Niel,
Dennis Stout, Herman R °mpel
None
STAFF PRESENT: Dan Colewm, Associate Plan er; Dougherty, As°istant
City Attorney; Rick Y F�ererhey,s
Administrative Secretary; Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil
Engineer; Michael Vairin, Senior Planner
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Chairman Rempei announced that students from the Upland High School Government
class wer= in attendance and he welcomed them.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Commissioner Stout requested that the Minutes of April 27, 1983, page 10,
paragraph 4 be corrected to read ...any thought to running Summit... rather
than ...any thought to closing Summit ...
Chairman Rempel requested that a correction be made to page 9, paragraph 6,
...by moving the driveway submitted... rather than ...by moving the building
submitted.
Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by Hempel, carried unanimously, to approve
the Minutes of April 27, 1983.
: r ■ a a
CONSENT CALENDAR
Commissioner Stout requested that Item B be removed from the Consent Calendar
for further discussion.
Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, to approve
Item A.
A.
B.
TIMES EXTENSION - TENT_aTIYE TRACT 11610 - RLS
Co=issioner Stcut stated that because of the
en negative hrecommendation by by
staff, he wanted to know what type f ag^ �
the developer, in order to get around the problem.
W. Robert Dougherty, City Attorney, explained the kind of agreement that
would be needed and advised the Commission that the sample agreement Which had
been provided to them would eliminate ate n�pa�trt of Real1Estateeould approve
escrow procedure, indicating Commission consider
the set of Cthe and recommended that the an aaggreement with the developer.
adoption of the resolution contingent P
Mr. Dougherty stated that the resolution refers to the articoles Of that a
incorporation but recommended that the wording be changed
replacement agreement would be entered into.
Y-. Tarry C_ristensen, 7333 Hellman, the developer, explained the difficulty
of ti.mi_ng in getting the loan approved contingent upon approved CC&R's. He
stated that the CC&R's would be completed before the certificate of occupancy
is issued.
Commissioner Stout stated that this project had been approved on
September 23, 1982 and asked why it took so long to come before the
Commission.
Mr. Christensen replied that because of the economy and the cost of financing
they,had postponed the project. Farther, the MR's 6weere notcompleted
not
because they are a front end cost of approximately ,
wish to incur without the project moving forward.
Commissioner Stout asked what the current Ci'_y policy is regarding CC&R's and
why they are required at the tide of recording the map.
Mr. Dougherty rerlied that ..ne timing is not arbitz•w7 and they should be
recorded at the time the map is up for final considertion. Further, that h it
is not absolutely necessary at that time except That the City must re recorded
control. He indicated that it would be all right if they
before occupancy takes place and should be recorded at the same time as the
final map in order to retain control.
Chairman Rempel explained the process for the edification of the Commission.
Planning Commission Minutes -2- May 25, 1983
Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Juarez, carried unanimously, to adopt
Resolution No. 811-110A, with an amendmer_t to the resolution to rr^quire a
replacement agreement rather thari ArticiPS of Incorporation of the Homeowners
Association.
a e * a a
PUBLIC HEARINGS
C. MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERM17 81 -C4 - ►'ZNEKARD NAT':ONAL 5AJX - •-
request to expand existing modular ban' -c building by aCding an additional
936 square feet and related parking; plus mzquect9ng an extennicn of time
for the time limits on the modular building. T,ais facility is 1 �`t °? at
8158 Vineyard Avenue.
Senior Planner, Michael Vairin, reviewed the staff report. He atatelth -t the
current City ordinance governing the issuance of Conditional Use Permits
requires consent of the legal property owner, or in the event that the
applicant is not the legal property owner, a statement from the legal owner
that the applicant is the authorized agent for the property. Mr. Vairin
stated that such consent or authorization has not yet been received and
therefore the applicant cannot proceed.
Mr. Dougherty stated that the applicants attorney has just furnished a letter
to him for his review in which the first paragraph refers to a letter dated
January 20, 1981 would give authorization to the applicant. He asked for time
to review the letter and asked that this item be deferred to later in the
agenda.
D.
& 12316 -1 -
HOMES - A total resiaenziai aeveivpmen� va , j -o-- -- -- --
dwellings on 73 lots ranging from 4800 square feet on 13.74 acres of
land, generally located on the south side of Base Line, on the west side
of Deer Creek Channel.
E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACTS 12317 A 12311-1A-
HOMES - A total residential aevelvpme„i va - o-,- - ---, --
dwellings on 100 lots ranging from 3960 square feet to 7500 square feet
on 14.29 acres of land generally located on the east side of Haven, south
of Base Lire.
Associate Planner, Dan Coleman, reviewed the staff reports.
Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing.
Ms. Kay Matlock, representing Lewis Homes, stated that they are familiar with
the conditions and have no problem with them.
Planning Commission Minutes -3- May 25, 1983
There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner McNiel stated that in Item E, existing property backs onto Haven
and asked what is going to separate the rear of that property.
tM. roleman replied that in the planned community text there are standards
along Base Line that call for a block wall and landscaping and supplemental to
the text, this will contain berming and landscaped treatment in the parkway.
Further, this would be a meandering sidewalk.
Commissioner Stout asked if the recommendations of the Design Review Committee
have been accepted and incorporated into the text.
Mr. Gomez replied that they have been and there is no further problem.
Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Mc Niel, carried unanimously, to adopt,
Resolution No. 83 -69, approving Tentative Tracts 12316 and 12316 -1, issuing a
Negative Declaration.
Commissioner Barker stated that there were a large number of concerns by staff
and the Planning Commission regarding these projects. Commissioner Barker
further stated that the Lewis Company did a sincere job of meeting those
concerns.
Chairman Rempel stated that this proves that the existing Design Review
process really works.
• � a • a
C. MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 81 -14 - VINEYARD NATIONAL aAN!:
- A request to expand existing modular bank building by adding an
additional 936 square feet and related parking; plus requesting an
extension of time for the time limits on the modular building. This
facility is located at 8158 Vineyard Avenue.
Mr. Dougherty stated that the firm of Buxbaum and Chakmakhas provided a letter
which he read; however, the question remains whether Mr. Rodriquez., the owner
of the property has any say in this. Further, the letter states that the bank
is responsible for all temporary improvements and the lessor is responsible
only and will reimburse for those improvements which will become part of the
permanent improvements. He indicated that it is the interpretation of
Mr. Buxbaum that the landlord does not have anything to say. Mr. Dougherty
questioned whether the improvements that the bank wants to make are temporary
or whether they are considered permanent.
Mr. Vairin replied that the improvements will be temporary.
Mr. Dougherty stated that under the circumstances, it would appear that this
is correct and that Mr. Rodriquez, approval is not required on those
improvements.
Planning Commission Minutes -4- May 25, 1983
Mr. Vairin stated that in that case, if the Planning Commission chooses to
move forward, there are two blanks for a ne w expiration date and asked the
Commission if they wished to continue this extension or. an annual basis or
make an extension that would be consistent with the lease.
Commissioner Barker asked how long an extension date would the Commission be
allowed to give.
Chairman Rempel replied that it could be extended indefinitely but the
Commission has not granted any beyond two years.
Mr. Vairin stated that there is no limitation on an interim use and from a
policy standpoint this project has been granted `che longest extension.
Chairman Rempel stated that there should be a longer term than one year but
there should be another condition placed on the project which states that if
another modification or building is done it would bring development a conditional use it
permit back to the Planning Commission, snd if any
would spur the permanent facility.
Mr. Vairin replied that the Commission can modify any condition of approval on
the original resolution and if they wished to key in under section 3, the date
could also be modified.
Chairman Rempel stated that it is not a good procedure to mix temporary with
permanent modifications.
Commissioner Stout asked what would be used to trigger it.
Chairman Rempel replied that it could be done if the permit were pulled, any
part of the center began to develop, or if the plans were given to the
Building and Safety Division.
Mr. Vairin stated that he could provide the language for this.
Commissioner Stout asked if the expiration date of the ground lease is known.
Chairman Rempel opened the public bearing.
wwiithstheepropertya owner �n the
forapplicant,
year. He indicated have
thatbeen negotiation
they will
continue negotiation but were unable to do so at this time.
Mr. Sensenbaah stated that the existing ground is indefinite but they
have been given 5 years by the board of directors of the bank and they desire
to develop the property. Further, that it is necessary that they expand the
building now.
Planning Commission Minutes -5- May 25, 1983
Commissioner Stout stated that the bank has a ground lease that can go longer
than 5 years and asked if it includes the right to develop that particular
corner of the shopping center. Additionally, what was the expiration date of
that five year period.
Mr. Sensenbach replied that it will expire in September 1986.
There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Stout stated that he sees no reason to bring this back on an
annual basis inasmuch as the expiration date of the ground lease could be the
triggering mechanism.
Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by Mct:iel, carried unanimously, to adopt
Resolution No. 82 -79A, approving the modification of Conditional Use Permit
No. 81 -04, with a modification to the resolution language to allow expiration
of the CUP to coincide with the ground lease in September 1986.
F.
nil
KINDFRCARE - The development of a 8400 square foot child care center for
Kindercare Child Learning Center, Inc., on 1.1 acres of land in the C -2
zone, located at 10100 E. Foothill Boulevard - APN 206- 331 -21.
G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 7891 - KINDERCARE LEARNING
CENTERS, INC. - A division of 2.9 acres into 2 parcels within the C -2
zone located at 10100 E. Foothill Boulevard - APN 208- 331 -21. (Related
File: CUP 83 -06)
City Planner, Rick Gomez, reviewed the staff report. Ye recommended that two
additional conditions be incorporated in the conditions of approval: the
earth tone fiberglass roofing material proposed on the main building shall be
used on the entrance cupola; and brick veneer detailing shall be provided on
all exterior elevations. The use of T1 -11 cedar plywood shall not be
allowed. Relative to the parcel map, he indicated that the subdivision of
parcel No. 1 would create an approximate 1.2 acre parcel.
Commissioner Stout asked if the block wall belongs to the property owner of
parcel 9337.
Mr. Gomez replied that he believed it was built in conjunction with the
adjacent property.
Commissioner Barker stated that he has some concern with access from Foothill,
getting cars into the parking lot and dropping children off at the school. He
asked if any adjustments had been made.
Mr. Gomez replied that they have been made and they will have a shared
driveway.
Planning Commission Minutes -6- May 25, 1933
Chairman Hempel opened the public hearing.
Mr. Dean Slaughter, construction supervisor for this project, stated that he
realized that the minimum required parking spaces for this project is 40, but
he feet that for the size of this school only 25 spaces are needed. He asked
for a reduction in the space requirement to 30 with the freed spaces to be
used as additional playground space.
Mr. Gomez stated that his only recommendation would be that the commission
consider the applicant's concern in conjunction with a variance. He indicated
that this item could be continued fending this ar_d brought back to the
commission.
Mr. Slaughter expressed some concern with the recommendation that the red bell
tower color be changed. He indicated that this is a trademark of Kindercare
and would create identity problems.
Mr. Gomez stated that the roof material color would be incorporated into the
tower per the recommendation of the Design Review Committee.
Mr. Slaughter stated that the little re' school house effect is what they
strive for and this would create some problems for them. He indicated that he
has a film of what they have used before but it would have to be shown at
another time. Further, that he does not wish to hold up the conditional use
permit because of the tower being red or brown.
Chairman Rempel stated that Mr. Slaughter should accept the conditions as
proposed and then come back with some renderings to show the Commission as
there might be something th2t the commission can do.
Mr. Gomez stated that the commission might suggest that this be reviewed by
the Design Review committee.
commissioner Stout asked about the existing wall and how this would be tied
into the project.
Mr. Slaughter replied that this is not their property and if approval is not
received from the property owners, the wall would be placed on the applicant's
property line or inside the line.
Commissioner Stout asked what Mr. Slaughter would do if he is unable to get
the property owner's concurrence.
He indicated that they would build a wall right next to the present wall that
would have the required 6 -inch separation.
commissioner Stout asked why they will use a wood wall.
Mr. Vairin replied that it is being used to be consistent with the theme of
the Mic`.iael J's restaurant.
planning Commission Minutes -7- May 25, 1983
There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed.
Chairman Rempel stated that the resolution should be written and amended in
such a way to give an opportunity to amend the parking spaces which seems 'like
a high requirement for a day care center.
M^. Gomez replied that a minor deviation would only reduce the requirement by
10 percent.
Chairman Rempel stated he felt that this could be worked out and that this
should be brought back to the Planning Commission.
Mr. Gomez s'tazed that the minimum number of spaces would be 40 until th-t
time.
Commissioner Barker stated that from a practical standpoint, a playground is a
better use than parking spaces.
Chairman. Rempel stated that relative to the cupola color, if he can come up
with a distinct color, he did not feel it would be too difficult to work this
out as well. He felt that there could be a nice blend.
Mr. Gomez stated that a minor deviation would come back to the Commission and
further, that he would recommend that Condition No. 11 require Design Review
approval along with the other two conditions he mentioned.
Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, to adopt
Resolution No. 83 -71 approving Conditional Use Permit No. 83 -06, and issuing a
Negative Declaration with the amendments regarding parking space adyustment,
cupola color and Design Review Committee review.
Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by Mc Niel, carried unanimously, to adopt
Resolution No. 83 -72, approving Parcel Map 7891 and issuing a Negative
Declaration.
f ; ■ • s
7:50 p.m. The Planning Commission recessed
8:02 p.m. The Planning Commission reconvened
H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 7945 - JUNIPER PROPERTY - A
division of 3.15 acres into one lot for condominium purposes within the
C -1 zone located on the east side of Grove Avenue between San Bernardino
Road and Rancheria Drive - APN 207 -123 -1 (Related File: DR 83 -11 ) .
I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 83 -11 - BARASCH - The
development of two office buildings totaling 43,580 square feet on 3.01
acres of land in the C -1 zone located at the southeast corner of Grove
Avenue and San Bernardino Road •- APN 207 - 121 -07.
Planning Commission Minutes -8- May 25, 1983
City Planner, Rick Gomez, reviewed the staff report.
Commissioner Stout asked where the deceleration lane is.
Mr. Colema-: -d that it is shown on the map as a curvilinear line.
Commissione. :;: asked how wide it will be.
Mr. Rougeau replied that it does not have to be a full width but will be about
10 -12 feet which will help with turning traffic and that it will not interfere
with traffic on Grove.
Commissioner Stout commented that it does not appear that the I ndscaning will
be adversely affected.
Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing.
There be'.ng no comments, the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Nc Niel asked what will be done about parking at Deane's across
the street.
Chairman Rempel stated that will not be able to park there anymore.
Chairman Rempel asked that when you are talking about the landscaped area on
the east wall are they speaking about the full length of the property line.
Mr. Gomez replied that they are talking about the full length of the property
line.
Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by Mc Niel, carried unanimously, to adopt
Resolution No. 83 -73, approving Parcel Map 7945 and issuing a Negative
Declaration.
Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, to adopt
Resolution No. 83 -74, approving Development Review No. 83 -11 and issuing a
Negative lieciaration.
f 4 i f f
J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 83-09_- GABRIC - The
development of a 193,588 square foot warehouse on 9.49 acres of land in
the General Industrial /Rail Served category (Subarea 5), located at the
southwest corner of 6th Street and Lucas Ranch Road - APN 210- C32 -01.
Michael Vairin, Senior Planner, reviewed the staff report and advised that
Mr. Gabric has distributed a letter dated May 24, 1983 wherein he has provided
another landscape island. He indicated that he would refer this design
solution to Paul Rougeau for a recommendation with regard to the City's access
policy.
Planning Commission Minutes -9- May 25, 1983
Mr. Rougeau stated that what has been proposed in the letter goes a long way
in alleviating the problem. Further, that as the letter points out, 6th
Street is envisioned to carry a lot of traffic and will not be as wide as they
would want it to be.
Mr. Rougeau stated that there are some constraints on the north side of 6th
Street and as it is only getting a secondary street status it will reduce to
less than the secondary. He indicated that the additional driveway requested
would be detrimental to traffic and for the overall good of the area, it
should be deleted.
Commissioner Stout stated that Stem 2 of the resolution indicates it to be
Lucas Ranch Road and asked if that should be 6th Street.
Cheirman Rempel stated that you are restricting access on Lucas Ranch Road.
Mr. Rougeau stated that they are restricting traffic on 6th Street.
Chairman. Rempel opened the public hearing.
Mr. Tom Gabric, the applicant, stated that the driveway shoull not be deleted
from that particular parcel because it has frontage and by providing
landscaping it will definitely cut truck traffic. He further stated that
traffic generated by passenger vehicles will not be substantial and he felt
would not be adding to the hazard. He indicated that his marketing people
have asked that the driveway remain.
Commissioner Stout asked about what appeared to be an accent stripe on the
building.
Mr. Gabric replied that it will be 2 blue colored building which will be sand-
blasted and will have a blue accent stripe. He indicated that 'hey will
submit a panel to show staff.
Commissioner Stout asked about the low doors which will be used by :rucks.
Mr. Gabric replied that the doors will be painted a different color.
Commissioner Barker stated that not much of the doors will be seen because of
the landscaping.
Commissioner Barker further stated that the access into 6th Street is designed
specifically for automobiles and he did not know why the driveway could not be
placed where the applicant wants it.
Mr. Rougeau replied that there is a physical problem in getting the best
circulation they can. Further, that staff is trying to draw the Commission's
attention to the policy wherein if a side street is available, it should be
restricted on a ma4or arterial street. He indicated that this is a big, long
parcel on the corner.
Planning Commission Minutes -10- May 25, 1983
Chairman Rempel stated that he would have a problem with that statement in
tiat this parcel is long enough that according to policy there will not be a
driveway closer than 300 feet. He indicated that if there was no other way to
get access you could still get two driveways. Further, that if you keep
visitor parking away from the truck entrance it would be all right.
Commissioner Stout stated that if you allow the driveway to remain, you should
not have left -hand turns there because it will be a traffic conflict.
IM1'. Rougeau stated that there could be a driveway off of Lucas Ranch Road.
Further, that it would be better to have a turning lane and better than a
median island on a narrow street.
Chairman Rempel stated that he agreed, but if there is a left turn lane, there
will not be a problem with an island past the driveway because it can be done
practically.
Commissioner Stout stated that he appreciated the applicant's concern with
visibility but has some concern with an extra 100 -200 feet. He also felt that
the Commission should be careful about changing its policy and felt that a
precedent would be set that they had better be aware o£.
Chairman Rempel stated that the Commission is not setting a precedent as it is
already what exists. Further, there is plenty of room to turn.
Commissioner Barker stated that another consideration woul:: be the 26 tn?ck
loading doors. Further, if there are only two entrances and parking alongside
for the offices and the north side, there would be problems with the trucks
coming in and out and asked if they would be compatible.
Mr. Rougeau stated that this is another good point. He explained the City's
experience with claims and how they are better to be settled out of court
rather than go into a lawsuit. _Tile indicated that his concern is that turning
into driveways would create problems. He also indicated that deceleration
lanes could mitigate this.
Commissioner Stout asked if the center driveway could be striped.
Mr. Rougeau replied that it could be.
Commissioner Stout asked if there could be a deceleration lane marked to
disallow trucks.
Commissioner Barker asked if a 35 -foot lane is necessary if you do not allow
trucks to go in.
It-. Rougeau replied that it is a good width even if there are no trucks
allowed.
planning Commission Minutes -11- 1-hy 25, 1983
!motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, to hava one
driveway access onto 6th Street with a deceleration lane for east bound
traffic with the center island striped for no left turns. Further, that a
sign of some type be posted for no truck access and the island modified as
submitted in the letter from the applicant.
i i e it f
K. ZONING OEDLNANCE DETERMINATION 83 -01 - EN AGAPE FELLOWSHIP - A request to
develop a church training school and dormitory in the R -1 zone.
Associate Planner, Dan Coleman, reviewed the staff report.
Commissioner Stout asked for the location of the site.
Mr. Coleman replied that it is located on the southeast corner of 19th Street
and Beryl.
Commissioner Stout asked if there are single family residents to the south,
north and west of the proposed site.
Mr. Coleman replied that there are.
Chairman Rempel stated that Mr. Coleman had said that the ordinance covers
churches and schools but excludes colleges and universities as far as saying
they are permitted in a residential zone.
M'. Coleman replied that it states that they are excluded in a R -1 zone.
Mr. tiairin read the section of the code relating to this.
Chairman Rempel stated that he did not think it was ever the intent of the
former Planning Commission to have such an exclusion although he is the only
member of the former Commission still serving.
Mr. Coleman stated that this is not the same as a zone determination and asked
that the Commission interpret the church use to include a dormitory or
training school facility.
Chairman Rempel stated that he would have a problem with that.
yr. Steve Cinti , representing En Agape Fellowship explained their training
program and what the dormitories would be used for. He indicated that it is
not their goal at the present time to become an accredited college or
university but to offer a unique program to overcome drug and alcohol abuse,
child abuse and unemployment.
Commissioner Vaa Niel asked where they are presently housing people.
Planning Commission Minutes -12- "lay 25, 1983
Mr. Cinti repliei they are housed in a number of homes in the community as the
people participating in the program become part of the congregation while they
are here.
Commissioner McNiel stated that what they are seeking is a dormitory to house
50 people with an additional 15 people who are staff.
Commissioner Stout stated that Mr. Cinti has indicated that eventually they
would plan to become a college or university and asked what they planned to do
with the dormitory at that time.
Mr. Cinti replied that they would still use the dorm.
Commissioner McHiel asked if Mr. Cinti has any idea of wbat this will look
like.
Mr. Cinti replied that a sketch has been done but he did not have it with him.
Mr. Vairin stated that the Commission's decision is not on the building or
approval but on the concept in this zone and the Commission would have an
opportunity to review the building and design at a later time.
Commissioner Stout stated that when he thinks of a dormitory, it is no
different than an apartment building and rather than make some exception for
this housing in an R -1 zone where there are single family homes, the
Commission. should consider making the site R -3 because he did not feel it to
be compatible with R -1.
commissioner Barker asked if he is talking about the general area.
Mr. Coleman replied that this would take a General Plan amendment.
Commissioner Barker stated that he is more comfortable with that approach than
saying it is or is not a dormitory because either it is an apartment house or
a dormitory or it is not and he would be uncomfortable with that type of
language.
Chairman Rempel stated his agreement but opened discussion on whether a
college or university should be in a R -3 zone. He felt that the criteria
should not be whether a college or university should be in a R -3 zone or
commercial area but the size of the piece of property. He stated further that
a private school or church school should build in a residential type area
because that is where they belong. He felt that a General Plan amendment
would be the way to go.
Planning Commission Minutes -13- May 25, 1983
Mr. Vairin stated that staff is presently working on the development code and
have found that in looking at dormitory uses other ordinances permit them in
conjunction with larger uses such as colleges or universities. He asked the
Commission if they feel comfortable with having churches added to the
definition and indicated that staff will come to the Commission with a
complete code that would conta:Ln this definition in a few months.
*r. Vairin stated that a General Plan amendment or a zone change is not good
for this purpose and if the Commission did not think that this request should
not be handled under the conditional use permit process, that is the statement
that the Commission should make.
Chairman R -ampel stated that with a Catholic church you have a situation with
housing for priests and sisters that is close but not the same as this but in
a sense is getting into a dovetailing. He stated further that it bothers him
to say you can build a 50 unit dormitory next to a church.
Commissioner Mc Niel stated that it will not be 50 units.
Commissioner Barker stated that it appears to be circuitous rather than a
direct approach.
Commissioner Mc Niel stated that he liked the concept but has problems.
Mr. Gomez stated that staff could develop standards and design compatibility
and with further analysis could come back to show how this would fit into a
residential neighborhood.
Chairman Rempel stated that he would go along with that.
Mr. Gomez stated that this might also be an issue that is deferred to the
development code and that they could combine instead of separate the
analysis. He indicated that this could to deferred for the next few months.
Chairman Rempel stated that he would like to see it sooner than that.
Mr. Gomez stated that staff could provide the Commission with information.
Commissioner McNiel asked what kind of a hindrance it would create for these
people.
Mr. Cinti stated that they have money in the bank and would like to get going
as soon as possible.
01?irman Rempel stated that eventually this would have to come before a public
hearing, and following analysis. the Commission will know whether a change
should be made through the development code or another vehicle. I* indicated
that once the Commission sets the standard here it will follow through for the
rest of the City.
planning Commission Minutes -14- May 25, 1983
the consensus of the Commission is that they will develop criteria and if they
can get something sooner, they will come back.
Commissioner Barker stated that he is still willing to see what staff brings
back but does not want to circumvent the process because they would really be
building an apartment house in a R -1 zone.
Commissioner Barker stated he would like to see what the concerns are but does
not want to circumvent the zoning.
Commissioner Stout stated that he still feels there should be a General Plan
amendment change and perhaps a zoning change.
Mr, Gomez stated that it may not be appropriate in this area.
� t • a �
L. PROPCSED PARKING ORDTINANCE AMENDMENT
Senior Planner, Michael Vairin, reviewed the staff report and asked that staff
be given authoriztion to move ahead with a possible amendment on parking
standards.
commissioner Stout stated he thought it to be a splendid idea and was for it
100%.
Mr. Clyde Lane, representing Kaufman and Broad agreed with staff and also
asked that they move ahead.
Ms. Kay Matlock, representing Lewis Homes, stated that '..hey are in a similar
situation in Terra Vista and if the Commission could act quickly, they would
appreciate it.
Commissioner Stout asked Ms. Matlock if they are thinking of trading parking
spaces for park land.
The consensus of the Commission was to proceed on an amendment to the parking
standards.
t : a s •
.ADJOURNMENT
Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by Mc Niel, carried unanimously, to adjourn.
Planning Commission Minutes -15- May 25, 1983
.
9,05 P.M. The planning Commission adjourned.
Respectfully submitted,
JACK LAM, Secretary
?fanning Commission Minutes
_16_ May 25, 1983
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Regular Meeting
June 8, 1983
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman, Herman Rempel, called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 7 p.m. The meeting was held at the
Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga,
California. chairman Rempel then led An the pledge of allegiance.
a i i, f *
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: avid Barker,
r, Berman Juarez, Larry Mc Niel,
D
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
STAFF PRESENT: Frank Dreckman, Assistant Planner; Rick Gomez, City Planner;
Eduard Hopson, Assistant City Attorney; Jack Lam, Director of
Community Development; Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer;
Michael Vairin, Senior Planner
ANNOUNC�?�TS
Jack Lam, Director of Community Development, stated that the first budget
lhearing for the upcoming fiscal year will be held in this room on
June 14, 1983 at 6 p.m. He invited the Commissioners to attend.
i i a ! f
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion: Moved by MoNiel, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, to approve
the Minutes of the Regular Planning Commission meeting Of May 11, 1983.
i i i ■ t
CONSENT CALENDAR
Commissioner Barker asked that Item B be removed from the Consent Calendar for
discussion.
Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by Juarez, carried unanimously, to adopt
Items A, C and D of the Consent Calendar.
A. TIME EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 81 -18 - JASKA
B. TRACT 10491 - LIGHTNER - The redesign of 20 single family homes on 4.78
acres of land in the R -1 zone, located a the southwest corner of Victoria
Street and Ramoua - APN 202 - 181 -04.
C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVhLUYMNT r&;VIZw 0S-14 - AuoQn'
MANUFACTURING - The development of a 32,000 square foot warehouse /office
addition to an existing industrial complex located on 4.7 acres of land
in the Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial Zone (Subarea 9) located on the
southeast corner of Jersey Boulevard and Utica Avenue - APN 209 - 143 -06.
City Planner, W.ck Gomez, apprised the Commission of a memorandum giver. to
them at this meeting which recommended that Tentative Tract Na.'s 10046, 10047
and 10349, have a condition added for consistency that the CC&R's for the
tracts shall not prohibit the keeping of equine animals, where zoning
requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. A copy of the
CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney prior to
recordation of the Final Map. Further, the owners of these tracts have been
notified and have submitted letters agreeing to the addition of this
condition.
Commissioner Barker stated that he was concerned with the standard stipulation
within the resolution and whether they will protect those pieces of property
with direct trail access. He wondered if these tract maps should be continued
in order that trail access for these particular areas have consistency. He
indicated that a stable near hillside and Archibald does not comply and asked
about the design and how access to the stable could be provided.
Mr. Gomez replied that under Standard Condition No. 3 the required compliance
for trails and a master plan for trails would be necessary prior to
recordation of the final map. Further, that the conditions would have to be
met in order for the tract map to final. 4e indicated that these conditions
would be reviewed by the Equestrian Committee to be sure that there is
compliance.
Commissioner Barker stated that there is no provision for Planning Commission
review.
Mr. Gomez replied that the City Attorney would have something to say about a
tentative tract map going back to the Commission after it has been approved.
Commissioner Barker asked if the Planning Commission would be approving
something blindly without having recourse of another review. Also, that in
taking this action of granting a time extension to these tentative tracts, the
Commission is approving something to which they will not have direct access.
planning Commission Minutes -?_- June 8, 1983
Mr. Gomez explained that with the CC&R requirements, the easements will have t
be included in the tract which would give every lot access without the
Planning Commission having to check on this aspect. Further, staff will make
certain that every piece of property will have access under the condition.
Chairman Rempe'. stated that the Park and Trails Committee would have the
authority to put these stipulations in and the tracts would be unable to
without compliance.
Chairman Rempel stated that the only condition that coL_d be imposed is t
this would come back if the owner is net satisfied, and if they were not,
could take it to the Planning Commission or City Council.
Mr. Hopson stated that for all practical purposes, once the Planning
Commission imposes conditions on a tentative tract and the time for appeal
expires, the process for the developer in order to get .final approval for the
tract is to prepare whatever paperwork is required and submit it to staff who
will decide if the conditions have beer. met. if everything has been met, it
is put in a package and submitted to the City Council. Mr. Hopson indicated
that the Council cannot add conditions and neither can the Planning
Commission. Further, that the only reason that the City can get extra
conditions now is because the developer ran out of time. When the developer
asks for something the City can ask for something in return and if the
developer consents, the conditions can be added. If the developer does not
consent, the Commission could ask for the additional conditions; but they
could also let the tentative tract expire without extending it. The developer
would then have to start over, at which time the new condtions could be
imposed.
Mr. Hopson stated that the standards which are being applied are current
standards which he would have to comply with in order to final his map.
Commissioner Barker asked for clarification on the refusal to extend the
on a tentative map and whether the applicant would have to come back:.
Mr. Hopson replied that allowing the tentative tract map to expire is a
discretionary matter.
Commissioner Barker stated that he does not want to give the developer the
short end of the stick but he wants to see to it that these tracts fulfill the
obligations and concerns of the community.
(*.. Hopson stated that as a matter of practical concern, two naps expire on
Wednesday, the 22nd of June, while another expires a week later. Further, he
is no`, sure what the developer could provide in the interim that would satisfy
Mr. Barker's concern without making him start again.
Commission Minutes
Mr. Frank Williams, Associated Engineers, representing Tentative Tract No.
10349, stated that they concur with the addition of the condition with the
CC&R`s. further, that this is an infill tract and completes the block. W.
Williams stated that they agree to all local feeder trails required by the
City and would see that this condition is adhered to.
Commissioner Stout stated that with regard to Sapphire, there should be a
trail on the west side.
Mr. Williams replied that at the time they did the tract they did not know if
there was one there but he indicated that there is adequate room to
provide it.
Commissioner Stout stated that sidewalks would be necessary because there is
only a horse trail now.
Mr. Williams replied that Mr. Rougeau can comment on sidewalks but there is
enough area to provide both a trail and sidewalks. He indicated that they do
not have any strong feelings one way or the other and they are sure they can
comply.
Mrs. Pam Henry, representing the Park and Trails Committee, stated that the
Kelber Development has conformed to the standards but that it is important
that the trails on Sapphire be shown. She indicated that they have finalized
the trail plan and that side of Sapphire is where it would be.
Mrs. Henry stated that with regard to the Anden Tract No. 10046, the gentlemen
who owns the boarding stable is concerned that no horses will be allowed next
door to him. He indicated that he does not want to be boxed in and felt that
this tract should conform to the higher standards of the Council.
Commissioner Stout stated that with regard to Tract 10349, the condition
should be clarified in that there is no sidewalk on Sapphire„ He indicated
that sidewalks are unnecessary because it is a horse trail all the way and it
should stay that way.
Commissioner Harker asked if there will be access en the north and if there i_z
a need for access to the stable area.
Commissioner Stout replied that he does not know.
t"s. Henry stated that the original plan called for a trail =iong the Alta
Loma channel and over to Hermosa.
Chairman Rempel stated that the trails will be looked at to be sure that there
is compliance with the provisions of the Council Resolution.
planning Commission Minutes -4- June 8, 1983
Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, to adopt
Item 5 of the Consent Calendar.
B. 2!E EXTENSIONS FOR THE FOLLOWING TENTATIVE TRACTS
Tentative Tract
Tentative Tract
Tentative Tract
Tentative Tract
Tentative Tract
Tentative Tract
PUBLIC HEARINGS
10349 -
Relber
11563 -
Red Hill Partners
10046
- Anden
10047
- Anden
11625
- Rcberts Group
11663
- Marlborough
E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE 83-01 - 1. ?RISTESON - A char.e f
zone from A -1 (Limited Agricultural) to C -2 (General Bus_;._xr
for 13.1 acres of land in the A -1 zone (C -2 pending) located at the
northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue -
APN 1077 - 401 -01, 03.
F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT bl-U( - kr'n'Z"Q2yV -
The development of the virginia Dare Center, a business park consisting
of office, banking, and restaurant uses comprising of 10 buildings on
13.1 acres of land in the A -1 zone (C -2 pending) located at the northwest
corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue - APN 1077 - 401 -01, 03.
Senior Pianner, Michael vairin, reviewed the staff report.
Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing,
Mr. Donald Christeson, 17522 Fitch, Irvine, the developer, stated that he and
Mr. Glenn Glatny of the Bissell Company, the architectural firm, were
available to answer any questions. Mr. Christeson indicated that he had
slides available if the Commission wished to view them and indicated that they
would ask for several modifications in the requirements.
Mr. Christeson indicated in the May 5, 1983 letter, from the City, Item 1A
requires an equestrian easement of 30 feet along the flood control channel and
asked that a portion of that trail in the lower southwest corner of the
property be allowed to deviate from the required width by 5 feet. He
indicated that this would allow for parking and the driveway as shown on the
map. Further, they have tried to work with General Telephone to shrink the
depth of the planter corner and to allow parking in the back along with
additional landscaping, but General Telephone has refused.
planning Commission Minutes -5- June 8, 1983
Mr. Christeson asked that the 15 -foot equestrian right -of -way be reduced to 10
feet. He also asked for clarification on Item 5, page 2, requiring tree
planters every seven car spaces. He indicated that thc]j could rearrange this
to get compact cars rather than full size cars and nor. lose the parking count.
Mr Christeson also asked about Item 5B, the construction of the Haven Avenue
landscape median, indicating that they do not oppose this but asked for relief
in the bonds for construction until Lewis Homes and the City are sure of the
design.
Mr. Vairin stated he would be able to provide comments on the three items
Mr. Christeson mentioned.
There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed.
Mr. Vairin stated that the tree planter wells are still conceptual and must
come back for a final plan. He indicated that w!-at Fr. Christeson has i, mind
would meet the parking requirement.
With regard to the regional trail issue, Mr. Vairin indicated that the strip
is 20 feet wide and with the addition of landscaping that will be put in even
if it were reduced by the requested five feet, it will appear as 20 feet.
Further, with regard to the Haven Avenue median, this has been discussed with
engineering staff and coordination as described by Mr. Christeson would be
appropriate.
Chairman Rempel stated that one thing that mast be looked at regarding the
trail is that no one seems to know where it will go once it gets to
Foothill. He indicated that a trail should be looked at that would really
be used.
Commissioner Barker indicated that Mr. Vairin made a good point and stated
Lhat theta Will VE 20 fae-_ of trail. He asked how much of a deviation -s
being discussed and if there will still be enough left for maneuverability.
He further indicated that at least 10 feet is needed.
Commissioner Stout stated that there is already 10 feet of asphalt along the
creek.
Chairman Rempel stated that it would be all right to deviate but felt that it
should be for the entire length of the property rather than just the section
indicated by Mr. Christeson. He indicated further that this is especially
true if the County will give him the additional easement.
Commissioner Stout asked Mr. rougeau if there is a need for a deceleration
lane.
Planning Commission Minutes -6- June 8, 1983
Mr. Rougeau replied that this is a good feature to add and is not in the
conditions but would be good for :11 the driveways along Foothill because thay
will be used in the future. He . indicated that the only additional width
needed is 6 feet.
Commissioner Stout asked if there is anything needed on Haven.
Mr. Rougeau replied that it would not change the right- of-way line.
Commissioner Stout stated that it is hard to conceptualize but he does not
know what this area will be like in 20 years and this should be considered.
He felt that there should be a deceleration lane north on Fentiill and west on
Haven as determined by the traffic engineer.
Mr. Hopson advised the Commission to act on the zone change first and then the
site plan.
Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, to adopt
Resolution No. 83 -78, approving zone change 83-01, issuing a Negative
Declaration.
Notion: Moved b; Barker, seconded by Stout, carried unanimously, to adopt
Resolution No. 83 -79, approving Conditional Use Permit 83 -07 and issuing a
Negative Declaration, with an a:aendment to add deceleration lanes, 5 -foot
encroachment requested on Deer Creek channel, and a lien agreement for the
median island.
� * • t a
7:45 p.m. The Planning Commission recessed
8:00 p.m. The Planning Commission reconvened
t if i f f
commissioner Stout stated that he would like to make an additional request
with regard to the previous project. He asked that a letter be sent over the
Mayor's signature requesting General Telephone to cooperate with the developer
of the Virginia Dare Center.
Motion: 14.ved by Stout, seconded by McNiel, carried unanimously, to request
that the Mayor send such a letter.
Mr. Joe DiIorio, came forward and indicated t':at Mr. Ralph Lewis is a member -
of tbn board of General Telephone and indicated that he may be able to
perso;.ally speak with the chairman of the board.
Chairman Rempel stated that perhaps the Mayor could write a letter to Mr.
Lewis to get it to General Telephone.
Planning commission Minutes -7- June 8, 1983
Commissioner Stout stated that whenever you write a letter, it commits the
person receiving it to a response. He indicated he would rather take this
approach than the more informal one.
Commissioner Barker asked if Commissioner Stout would like a polite letter set
with a copy to Mr. Lewis.
G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12414 - ALMAR - A total
development and subdivision of 12.3 acres into 93 lots comprising of 92
detached single family units in the R -2 zone, generally located south of
Mignonette Street between Beryl and Opal Streets - APN 202 - 032 -71.
Frank Dreckman, Assistant Planner, reviewed the staff report.
Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing.
Mr. Terry Lane, engineer representing the de eloper and Mr. (list Beckmeier,
the architect, stated they are in agreement tiith the requirements for
approval.
Mr. Robert Brown, owner of the property to the south and east of this proposed
development stated that his property is zoned A -1 and asked what future effect
this development will. have on his property.
Mr. Hopson replied that the A -1 zone currently is not in conformance with the
General Plan; however, it has not as yet been changed. Mr. Hopson stated
further that regardless of what zoning change occurs, Mr. Brown will be able
to keep his property and use it the way he has been without anyone
stopping him.
Chairman Rempel stated that if Mr. Brown has one -half acre of property or
more, he will be able to continue the keeping of animals on it.
There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Stout stated it was his understanding that during the Design
Review process there was some recommendation regarding the recreational
vehicle parking and he is unable to tell if it is there or not.
Mr. Dreckman replied that there is a condition that moves the recreational
vehicle storage area which is buffered and hidden from view of the str°et and
the single family dwellings.
Commissioner Stout asked if the compact car spaces would require redesign of
the house.
Planning Commission Minutes -8- June 8, 1983
Mr. Dreckman replied that it does but there is no problem with the applicant.
Commissioner Barker asked if there will be some way of providing water.
Mr. Dreckman replied that this can be added.
Chairman Rempel asked what the distance is between the paved area in the
recreational vehicle parking yard and how wide a buffer there is.
MIr. Gomez replied that the Design Review Committee recommended a mini=m 25
foot setback.
Chairman Rempel asked how wide the landscape island is since this problem is
practically in his front yard. He asked if there will be adequate screening-
Mr. Dreckman replied that there will be a concrete block wall around the
existing parcel which will pull it down.
Chairman Rempel st -tted that the wail will only be It feet high.
Chairman Rempel stated that one condition he would like to see imposed would
be that e, the specimen tgeatet the yard placed
where the vehicles are p trees
recreational will not be
sticking up.
Commissioner Stout stated that the police want to be able to see in because
they will bi! away from the houses.
Ccmm_ssicner Barker recommended that a lot of
ie indicated that in the loc
dationuof
the parking area because of the overhang•
wearing the tree rather than parking under it.
K-. Vairi-n stated that his understanding of condition E -5 is that it requires
a mi_ni=m percentage of trees. He indicated that this can be added to or it
can be consolidated in the parking area.
Commissioner Stout asked Mr. Rougeau that a bubbler structure is.
Mr. Rougeau replied that it is a catch basin that works in eversse�e�treet.
indicated that during a storm it comes bubbling out and goes ito
Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, to adopt
Resolution S7o. 83 -80 , approving Tentative Tract Pao. 12414 and issuing a
Negative Declaration with an amendment to provide water facilities within the
recreational vehicle storage area and specimen trees.
-9_ June 8, 1983
^ m:a
fanning Coission Minutes
H. ENVIROWENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 7972 - PNEUDRATJLICS 1NC. - A
division of 8.5 acres into 2 lots within Subarea 3 of the industrial
Specific Plan located at the southeast corner of Arrcw Route and Helms
Avenue - APN 209 - 021 -25.
Senior Civil Engineer, Paul Rougeau, reviewed the staff report.
Chairman Rempel stated that his agenda packet does not contain a map being
shown on the screen and suggested that thi be coordinated in the future.
Chairman Rempel opened the public hearirg.
Mr. Gary Sanderson, Linville and Associates, representing the applicant,
agreed with all conditions of approval.
Mr. Hopson stated that the applicant would split the parcel and would have to
encumber this in any event with a deed of trust.
Nbtion: Pbved by VhNiel, seconded by Stout, carried unanimously, to adopt
Resolution No. 83-81, approving Parcel Nap 7972, issuing a Negative
Declaration.
I.
63 -01 - An amendment to the industrial
development standards for interim use.
M
City Planner, Pick Gomez, reviewed the staff report. He indicated that there
would be a language change to Section I of the Resolution to allow the
permitted interim uses with the provision that no permanent buildings are
constructed. "Farther, that as a. condition of approval, an agreement between
the City and applicant shall be co,pleted stipulating timing, installation of
permanent improvements and buildings; and /or restoration of the site to its
original condition.
Commissioner Stout stated his agreement wi *.h the changes and asked that the
paragraph in Section I be broken down for easier understanding.
Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing.
There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed.
Nbtion: Nbved by Stout, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, to adopt
Resolution No. 83 -01A, recommending that the City Council approve these
amendments to the Industrial Area Specific Plan regarding development
standards fcr interim uses.
Planning Commission Minutes -10- .bane 8, 1983
! * t i *
DIRECTOR'S REPORTS
J. EQUESTRIAN TRAIL GUIDELINES - Amending Resolution 81 -53 establishing
trail design standards.
City Planner, Rick Gomez, reviewed the staff report.
Commissioner Stout stated that a few things should be kept in mind with regard
to the proposed guideline changes wnich would require some fine tuning as they
go on. He indicated that the changes are feasible and could be modified to
conform with the intent of the guidelines. He indicated that this is
especially true where the slopes and landscaping are to be retrofitted.
Commissioner Stout stated that this .should not be thought of as being a
complete plan but should put people on notice that the City means business
when it talks about horse trails.
Commissioner Juarez asked how much implementation of this plan will cost.
Chairman Rempel .:plied that what Commissioner Juarez is asking is who will
bear the cost of this plan and he stated that the trails will be put in by
developers. He indicated that in the retrofit area it would be difficult to
come up with a cost figure.
Commissioner Juarez asked if this is just for new subdivisions or if it will
be for those who already have horses and stalls.
Mr. Hopson stated that the proposal before the Commission from staff would
impose conditions on new development.
Mr. Gomez stated that these guidelines are defined through the General Plan.
3hairman Rempel indicated that rather than calling the standards proposed,
maximum standards, they should be called optimum standards especially as they
relate to the degrees of grading. Further, in some areas the percentage of
grade is inadequate for run off and would create puddling during rain. He
felt that there should be a minimum of a four percent grade t.1d that
engineering staff should be consulted regarding this.
Commissioner Stout questioned Chain Rempel's statement and asked if there
would have to be a retaining wall to ensure adequate grading.
Chairman Remy el stated that a 2 -1 slope is what is required where the dirt is
very loose. Further, it is ridiculous to take in that much land in order to
cut the slope.
Planning Commission Minutes -11- June 8, 1983
Commissioner Stout asked
if
the
trail
will be wide
enough if this were done.
Chairman Rempel replied
that
it
would
be.
Mr. Gomez stated that in Lhe grading ordinance, 2 -1 is the maximum without the
retaining wall and that the Commission is not saying anything more than an
assurance of consistency with the grading ordinance.
Commissioner Barker asked if the possibility exists of rewriting the
guidelines to cover this.
Chairman Rempel stated that these should really be corrected and rather than
saying they are maximums, they should say optimums.
Mr. Gomez stated that this can be worked out with the Equestrian Committee and
also be discussed with the Buildi -ng Official.
Commissioner Stout did not feel this should go back to the Equestrian
Committee out was something that could be worked cut with engineering staff.
Mr. Gomez stated that this would be discussed with both Engineering and
Building and Safety.
Chairman Pempel pointed out needed changes in standard drawing No's. 1007,
1008, 1009 and 1010.
Pam Henry, member of the Park and Trails Committee, stated that the figures
used in the standard drawings were based on research and came from other areas
where they have been used and tested. Further, that the trail manual which
was used for these standards, recommends that these be optimum standards.
Mrs. Henry spoke of the drainage easements.
Chairman Rempel replied that the trails would be better designed with a six
percent cross.
Ws. Henry stated that she is concerned that if the guidelines go to the
engineering department the Park and Trails Committee will not have the benefit
of input. She indicated that her fear is that they might overlook certain
problems and asked that the Park and Trails Committee look over any changes as
a safeguard.
Mr. 4airin stated that with regard to cross grades ir rural areas and the
steeper parts of town, there is normally a cross slope of 4 -5 percent. He
indicated that this is used mostly for cross lot drainage and that this
particular standard could be rewritten.
Chairman Rempel suggested that the extruded concrete fence called out in
standard No. 1010 be made of white concrete, a High- Early.
Planning Commission Minutes -12- June 8, 1983
Commissioner Stout asked about Figh -Early and whether it is a special brand
name or a type of concrete.
Chairman Rempel stated that it is a type of white cement and rather than
saying that the members be painted white, for maintenance they should be made
of a white cement.
Commissioner Stout asked if there is some provision for trails that go around
driveways.
Mr. Rougeau replied that this is covered for street crossing on note number
nine.
Commissioner Stout stated that there is only one condition that has not been
clarified and that is the side slope.
Chairman Rempel felt that the standards should be written as optimums rather
than maximums.
Mr. Gomez replied that the proper language will be inserted.
Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, to adopt
Resolution No. 81 -53A to establish design standards with the amendments as
propsed by the Commission.
K. PROPOSED PARKING ORDIN[LNCE 10IF.NDMENT STUDY SESSION
Senior Planner, Michael Vairin, reviewed the staff report. HP indicated t;:at
the parking ordinance amendment is a proposed item and will come back to the
Commission at their June 22 meeting.
Commissioner Stout asked with respect to single family dwellings, are carports
allowed.
Mr. Vairin replied that the standards will allow garages or carports if
approved by the Planning Commission.
Commissioner Stout asked if this is how the definitions are interpreted and
how the proposed ordinance will be written.
Mr. Vairin replied that if Commissioner Stout does rot like the idea of a
carport at all it can be changed; however, staff was trying to create some
design flexibility.
Planning Commission Minutes -13- June 8, 1983
Commissioner Stout sated that philosophically he does riot believe that
language permitting carports ahould be introduced because human nature tends
to make people take the less stringent route. He felt that if you say carport
instead of a garage, you would be starting something. He indicated he was not
completely against carports as they may be appropriate in some areas.
Mr. Vairin indicated that a hardship clause allowing carports could be written
into the ordinance.
Commissioner Stout replied that he would like to see it structured.
Chairman Rempel stated that most ordinances state that you must have two
covered spaces.
Mr. Vairin stated that most single family units designate garages.
Chairman Rempel stated that carports encourage the dismantling of cars.
Mr. Vairin stated that staff has not had anyone come in with a single family
tract who has wanted to install carports.
Chairman Rempel stated that the wording can be changed to encourage garages.
There was discussion on whether the issue of carports on a single family
dwelling could be allowed through a variance or minor deviation procedure with
the conclusion that this would be a costly way of allowing the carports under
some circumstances.
ADJOURAI-ENT
Notion: Moved by Stout, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, to adjourn.
9:07 p.m. The Planning Commission adjourned.
Respectfully submitted,
JACK LAM, Secretary
Planning Commission Minutes -14- June 8, 1983
E
E
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF DEPORT
DATE: June 22, 1983
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND Z014
dmereu my
Standards, of the Rancho
Ordinance.
STANDARDS - An ordinance
Residential Parking
Cucamonga Interim Zoning
BACKGROUND: At the previcl,s Planning Commission meeting of
June983, the proposed Parking Ordinance amendment was introduced to
the Planning Commission for review and discussion. The Commission
raised a concern regarding the use of carports for conventional single
family detached dwellings.
The current Ordinance lists carports as permitted, subject to Planning
Commission ap- ro:•al. There are basically three alternatives for
consideration by the Planning Commission with regard to the use of
carports:
1. Co not permit carports in conjunction with conventional single
family detached dwellings.
2. Permit carports only with approval by the Planning Commission.
3. Permit carports only with the approval by the Design Review
Committee.
The concerns with carports generally revolve around design and
aesthetics. In some instances, a carport may be appropriate when
located out of view. In other instances, the use of carports added to
the front of an existing structu—e could be detrimental to the overall
design of the structure, as well as the aesthetic integrity of the
neighborhood. It is staff's recommendation that carports do require
some review and regulation and that the Code should contain some
flexibility in the event that carports are appropriate. Therefore, we
would recommend that the use of carports be subject to review and
approval by the Design Review Committee for both single family
conventional dwellings and for clustered developments and semi - detached
single family dwellings.
ITEM A
Zoning Ordinance Amendment 83 -04
Planning Commission Agenda
June 22, 1983
Page 2
11
In further review of the proposed Ordinance, staff adjusted the parking a
ratios for the clustered development category
breakdown in parking king pa a atre two r based n number f
and three bedroom units be etreated
equally. In reviewing this with the parking study that has been used,
we are recommending that the two and three bedroom figures be separated.
Additionally, staff added a sentence under the clustered development visitor parking may e
category which indicates that on- street
substituted for off - street visitor parking in the duplexes. siThis
family, zero lot line, patio home developments, appropriate street widths
would be allowed only in the event that the P
ce with adopted engineering street section
are provided in accordan
standards.
Staff reviewed several parkin9and'found that the figures and ratios
well
parking studies and surveys, A
proposed by this Ordinance are the most accurate and closely related to
the types of developmen which thamendment currently for grificant adverse
has reviewed the proposed such impacts.
environmental impacts and have not identified any
Therefore, it is recommended that the Commission recommend adoption of a
Negative Declaration to the City Council.
RECOMMENDATION: ub cheang to co�sidermnal l public t input On this amendment conduct
all
CortubICon concurs with the Ordinance as presented, adoption of the
attached Resolution which recommends approval of the Ordinance to the
City Council would be appropriate.
fully submitted,
At ck IGornez
ity Planner
G :MV:jr
Attachments: proposed Ordinance vroval
ORDINANCE NO. 1233
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 61.0219(b)(7) OF
THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 123,
RESIDENTIAL PARKING STANDARDS
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does
ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: Section 61.0219(b)(7) of the Rancho Cucamonga Interim
Zoning Or finance is hereby amended to read as follows:
(7) Residential Uses:
(A) Single- family dwellings (conventional). Two
(2) parking spaces within a garage or
carport. The use of carports requires approval
from the Design Review Coasnittee.
(B) Cluster development (condominium, townhome,
etc.) semi - detached single family (zero lot
line, patio homes, duplexes, etc.) and mobile
home parks:
(I) Studio: 1.3 off - street parking space
per unit in a garage or carport.
(II)
One )
spaces per unit of which one s
space
be in a garage or carport.
(III)
Two ) bedrooms: nit
,l of off-street which one parking
spaces
shall be in a garage or carport
(IV) st ( m bedrooms:
off-
street parking spaces per munit of which
one space shall be in a garage or
carport.
(V) In additicn to the required number of
parking spaces for each unit, one
off - street uncovered parking space shall
be provided for each four units for
visitor parking. For single family zero
lot line, patio i,omes, and duplexes, on-
street parking may be substituted for
visitor parking.
Ordinance No.
Page 2
(VI) For developments containing five or more
units, up to fifty percent of the
required uncovered spaces may be compact
car size.
(VII) The use cf carports requires approval
from the Design Review Committee.
(C) Apartments:
(I) Bachelor and one bedroom dwelling
unit: 1.3 off - street parking spaces for
each dwelling unit of which one space
shall be in a garage or carport for each
unit.
{II) Two (2) 5edroom dwelling units: 1.6
off - street parking spaces for each
dwelling unit of which one space shall
be covered for each unit.
{III) Three (3) bedrooms or more dwelling
units: 1.7 off - street parking spaces
for each dwelling unit of which one
space shalt be covered for each unit,
plus 0.2 off - street parking space for
each bedroom in excess of three (3).
(IV) In addition to required number of
parking spaces for each unit, one (1)
guest parking space shall be required
for each four (4) units.
(V) For building sites containing five (5)
or more dwelling units, up to fifty (50)
percent of the required parking spaces
uncovered may be of compact car size.
SECTION 2: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, hereby finds that this amendment will not cause significant
adverse impacts on tte environment and issues a Negative Declaration for this
Amendment.
SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk
shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its
passage at least once in The Daily Re ort, a newspaper of general circulation
published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California.
2
Ordinance No.
Page 3
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this * day of *, 19*.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. 'Wasserman, City er
1
0
Jon D. Mi a s, Mayor
RESOLUTION NO. *
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOfflENDING APPROVAL OF ZONING ORDINANCE AMENTMENT NO.
83 -04, RESIDENTIAL PARKING STANDARDS
WHEREAS, on the 25th day of May, 1983, the Planning Commission
directed staff to prepare an amendment to the residential parking standards;
and
WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of June, 1983, the Planning Commission held
a duly advertised public hearing.
SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the
foilowina f2findings:
1. That the amendment is warranted in order to provide
standards which can be applied to the various
housing types that are being constructed; and
2. That the proposed amendment would not have
significant impact on the environment; and
3. That ttie proposed amendment is consistent with the
policies of the General Plan.
SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that
this amenTm—e—n—t--w-TP not create a significant adverse impact on the environment
and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on June 22, 1983.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the
City Council approve and adopt Zoning Ordinance
Amendment No. 83 -04.
2. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related
material hereby a opted by the Planning Commission
shall be forwardeli to the City Council.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED "HIS 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 1983.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Herman Rempel, Chairman
ATTEST: _
Secretary of the Planning Commission
Resolution No.
Page 2
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly 'ntroduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 22nd day of June, 1983, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES:
CONMflISSIONERS:
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
11
�1
E
11
L-1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 22, 1983
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
By: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACTS 12318 &
12318-1 - LEWIS HOME - A tots resi entia deve opment of
0 single family attached dwellings on 74 lots ranging
from 3100 square feet to 6750 square feet on 9.5 acres of
land, generally located on the east side of Haven Avenue,
north of Deer Creek Channel - APN 1077 - 091 -10
I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Requested* Approval of subdivision maps, site plans,
an elevations.
B. Purpose: Development of 70 single family attached dwellings
C. Location: East side of Haven Avenue, north of Deer Creek
Channe Exhibit "A ")
D. Parcel Size: 9.5 acres
E. Existing Zoning: PC 81 -01 (Terra Vista)
F. Existinq Land Use: Vineyard
G. Project Density: 7.4 du /ac
H. Surroundin Land Use and Zonin :
North - Vineyar PC 8_- Terra Vista)
South - Vineyard; PC 81 -01 (Terra Vista)
East - Vineyard; PC 81 -01 (Terra Vista)
West - Single family tract; R -1
I. Planned Community Land Use Desi nations:
Fr o —ject ite - Low -Me 7um Resi entia -8 du /ac)
North - Low- Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac)
South - Office Professional
East - Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac)
West - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac)
ITEM B
Tentative Tracts
June 22, 1983
Page 2
J. Site Characteristics: Slopes southward at approximately a
grade, no structures or trees, Deer Creek Channel abuts
easterly tract boundary.
K. Appiicable Regulations: Terra Vista Community Plan permits one
dwelling per TTO sq. ft. minimum lot to approximately 7200 sq.
ft. maximum lot in a conventional subdivision in the Low Medium
Residential designation.
iI. ANALYSIS:-
A. General: These two tracts comprise a single development with
an average lot size of 4,000 so, ft. These single family homes
are attached in pairs along a common property line. The tracts
have been designed with a variety of setbacks, lot widths and
depths and lot patterns in conformance with the Community Plan
text. Access will be provided from Haven Avenue via Street "G"
located 350 feet north of Church Street. Secondary access will
be provided by Street "F ", which connects with Tract 12317 -1 to
the north. Both access points will be gated for security.
Common recreation facilities will be provided on Lot "B"
located adjacent to Deer Creek Channel.
B. Design keview Committee: The Committee recommended approval
su sect to the-f-oTlowing revisions:
c Provide opening in solid block wall at end of side -on
cul -de -sacs or using wrought iron fencing.
o Provide landscaping on both side., of fence at the end
of cul -de -sacs, which may necessitate elimination of
parking spaces.
o Relocate Street "G" to conform to General Plan access
policies for Haven Avenue.
The applicant has relocated Street "G" as shown on the attached
exhibits. The solid block wall and landscaping have not been
revised, therefore an appropriate condition of approval has
been attached requiring redesign.
C. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study, as
completed by the app icant, is attached for your review. Based
upon corpietion of Part II of the Initial Study, staff has
found that no significant adverse impacts not addressed in the
Environmental Impact Report will occur.
E
u
T
entative Tracts
June 22, 1983
Page 3
L.
12318 & 12318-1/Lewis
III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the Terra Vista
Planned Community Plan and General Plan. The project will not be
detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant adverse
environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use, buiiding
design, and subdivisions, together with the recommended conditions,
are in compliance with the Zoning Ordinance and City standards.
IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing
1n Tie - ai y Report newspaper and the property posed. Notices were
sent to property owners within. 300 feet of the project site. To
date, no correspondence has been received either for or against
this project.
V. RECOMMENDATION: it is recommended that the Planning Commission
consider all material and elements of this project. If after such
consideration the Commission can support the facts for finding and
conditions of approval, adoption of the attached Resolution and
issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate.
;ful ly
Rick Gomez
City Planner
Rh:DC:jr
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "8" - Area Development Plan
Exhibit "C" - Site Utilization /Natural Features
Exhibit "D" - Subdivision Map
Exhibit "E" - Site Plan
Exhibit "F" - Landscape Plan
Exhibit "G" - Grading Plan
Exhibit "H" - Front Elevations
Exhibit "I" - Rear and Side Elevations
Initial Study, Part I
Resolution of Approval with Conditions
El
►�WilvMaan =r.�/ �
�b o
WfafaO tf: q��
'ilia go a 9
Ziiififwf �►i��
C
ni�i�iaiiaf awns �
aaa•Aa'.�u.
human- f
T
of -��y►�
1
r• Initw� _ '
' °fro �''°•�
rffa
r.
• J�
Y.,
it .Rl. t
.�
F7ME7 VQl.��
❑"
Ll
JII
J
— Ici$q CiFa! — wwaa•Eeess �� � G
oaa.
i
EEC
�e
Y\
- -J
_I
z
z
�
m
:
s r o..•'�
p
ae .e�E
w
_ I
.. Ems.,... I
- _
I
i
— Ici$q CiFa! — wwaa•Eeess �� � G
oaa.
i
,mown:,o�r,u
yr rn+w
vwvesTr� eo s3r,a+ �na-i �
1
t
n
e�
Aso• ®a��
_ a.aemssn_�
..w.O.l�l.1O.11
� �
L
TTY`
pOi VT'a1W ll�pp.
I
.ai
a
c1
z
<
V
0
L
S
-._'_
0
/
n
e�
,R
't
:i
a;
i�
Aso• ®a��
_ a.aemssn_�
..w.O.l�l.1O.11
� �
L
TTY`
pOi VT'a1W ll�pp.
I
.ai
,R
't
:i
a;
i�
r1
t
L
11
F
2 =WAV
\ ,�,.
I
I
r1
t
L
11
El
E
0
,a�wu'.vcv m:
mnx- �vo+ sun3!
..r
e
a
M
6
O
<
O
<
Y r
F•
z
i -'-�J
.y
�
Z LSI
r
< • a
O
a ®-a
Y
Y4
as
a:
xaI v
a.Yas�s :--
iwsYru.�tarn�
c;
1
.n
Y
V C
I
f
J
t
� i . I .� i e l. l . � I• I. 1_ I. I. t. I. 1. I l I
r
lt+ 4 V*rjOCW3 �VI Y++eMoM t
1
SVA31
cc
H
f�
<
H
0
twwt v� u.u. a.u.wu
<
m
/
ry
��A B1Ai
<
�
s
z= /
z
v •�..
G
+ y •�
•a .
m
<.
H yt.• m ,
W
1
C JC
1
:u.
-t
2
• s a
-Sig i Y�
4 aE '11 3x �� EyS ;�lYSs =�� iI
w
<
0
twwt v� u.u. a.u.wu
<
m
ry
��A B1Ai
ROt9YlTLLmmVLRI
�
s
_
� _
1
C JC
1
:u.
-t
2
• s a
-Sig i Y�
4 aE '11 3x �� EyS ;�lYSs =�� iI
I
ai
Ji t
f
Say_ t�4i: - "!!i' n ➢ -
i
i r
?\ Y r
C '
5 i
i �-
1
V
L —
(• to 194w/ p
E
11
0
w
<
0
<
m
ry
I
ai
Ji t
f
Say_ t�4i: - "!!i' n ➢ -
i
i r
?\ Y r
C '
5 i
i �-
1
V
L —
(• to 194w/ p
E
11
0
E
Ll
tl a ma,raa, °vs�o�• •a°.
iltlCl; nw�O $„aWO3f Stnlf3l
1
CCC
ti
i�
-4i
tii5g
C' �!
Ei��lii Ff¢'1
] 9
:: a c I', Y�f3 � •a3
ply •.Y: fa - YYSE;; � =C�i ]� O:,i
cdisi_a;yaz ee:v
I
.L
<
= l
W l
e
i
W
�y
M
CIA
-
FFa
O
z
ila
z
v e fy
O
W
m
r
6
m
V �
E
E
F
w
L�
l
i�
-4i
tii5g
C' �!
Ei��lii Ff¢'1
] 9
:: a c I', Y�f3 � •a3
ply •.Y: fa - YYSE;; � =C�i ]� O:,i
cdisi_a;yaz ee:v
I
.L
<
= l
W l
7 .}\ / \\
- ......r.t� � . I r...�• i•a O E W_ W
:T'� -•— --_ _ '•i —� � is T = fj.
� W / V rOy1• T • r
Ll� j
l � J
I a
It
wigpvo
t'
_
Y
6 .2
a
1 �
y W
t
I �
l= �
yl I
i' 1
e
i
c
p5
-
FFa
7 .}\ / \\
- ......r.t� � . I r...�• i•a O E W_ W
:T'� -•— --_ _ '•i —� � is T = fj.
� W / V rOy1• T • r
Ll� j
l � J
I a
It
wigpvo
t'
_
Y
6 .2
a
1 �
y W
t
I �
l= �
yl I
i' 1
a
3
..
-
777,7-
I.�e.na•.aYraom..
Cat
,
i
a
3
s
M
Y
1 4 \ 5 0
� 2 0
r
i
u.
.I
Y
V
'0
i
3
\ -J
Cat
,
O
e
<
/ f
O
zL1a
Z"
'tag# °
�
o
F
i y
s
M
Y
1 4 \ 5 0
� 2 0
r
i
u.
.I
Y
V
'0
i
3
\ -J
\I10
Y\
O
r < W —
w o �;
vi fir, `s O:
C-
Q <
Y'
Q ♦� W <r
t o:
0
� V
Z
E-•
_ ♦lattaYLlA�Ytfai
A
1•
�vt 1
��orui
!- Q
w�
\I10
Y\
O
r < W —
w o �;
vi fir, `s O:
C-
Q <
Y'
Q ♦� W <r
t o:
0
� V
Z
E-•
_ ♦lattaYLlA�Ytfai
mil. •�L
A
1•
i t
wrau�mnm 3
!- Q
mil. •�L
A
1•
i t
a
s
s -
H
W
6
.. V
O
0
0
� a
x
oti
I{ z
I lr 1 W _ y•
w
,—U
i' i i
W 4 �
W 1
F
W
a
0
u
t z
s <
E
O
�
l �
I
W.
I =
I = -
r
1,{
/ S
1
�Y
�e
1♦
t.
L O
i• \� 11 W ��
i
Y
6
F
e
o �
Y II
i
C
3
r=
A
1•
a
s
s -
H
W
6
.. V
O
0
0
� a
x
oti
I{ z
I lr 1 W _ y•
w
,—U
i' i i
W 4 �
W 1
F
W
a
0
u
t z
s <
E
O
�
l �
I
W.
I =
I = -
r
1,{
/ S
1
�Y
�e
1♦
t.
L O
i• \� 11 W ��
i
Y
6
F
e
o �
Y II
i
C
3
r=
u�PV� eo'oPrv�
nrr. iPUwu, wOPO°� w°
j0 S3gOH SN�Ii -I
d W
6I C I P2
x
c
T
\l V
ul r
)� Fes„ • / // �
� I
Q i
' S
:per
a ry
P ,
f O;r qw/ if
Ll
E
,�
P..P.n rL10PIJCPIJPR
t'++9san!YS� _
:;
-
Aj�G
P�u� v aa.+a vwaar
tygpi�l
vj
d W
6I C I P2
x
c
T
\l V
ul r
)� Fes„ • / // �
� I
Q i
' S
:per
a ry
P ,
f O;r qw/ if
Ll
E
11
LJ
0
tl s7 e.m.oa o -
�mnwa
d0 � i701� SVFd'1 ILI
L -:
CM
N
L Q
�} Z
L/L m
w
UA
F-
n�
t
�L
\J
nVA Wmet 1
...._, ....
i�
�A
6
S 1
> 1
Y'
ff��71
•;4 Jp9_
Ct:"
FM RI
s
r
l
y
mail
asaaa vaaYaay.yos
WAR •uul
<s�
S
0
i
r..
'Jaa1 _
1
a
0
_ >v
1
n
r
61
e,
w
�y
zM
.JN
�®
<
m F 6
z
Q
Z;
tr
<
Z
W
G eY� r
to Fia <
a. yY ty_a
cc
v
�
s i'•.a
u z tier
._ab
i� u Q
u r
s
iL`
Z
A°
♦mot
WL/
l
y
mail
asaaa vaaYaay.yos
WAR •uul
<s�
S
0
i
r..
'Jaa1 _
1
a
0
_ >v
1
n
r
61
e,
E
11
E
1A>!l�Lm �� STAil L�
s
�cQ
Qtej
ri
0.
V"1 <
e0 <
aZ; °
za<°_ =,
in
0 � v z a3t= ■
�r • 0
o
z !!:E' <
Z r�a
u
v �
� y
.�o
1.
ags�aeual csw.....s•. � �• = � �'
Haavaaaaw.va waarw-
G
N
\
n
■
■
V
i Y
O =
■
2 Z
<
Z 1
y1
i
s
r
O
avTl
�
r
`
r
Z
fXtt
4
i�Zt
1
N
\
n
■
■
V
i Y
O =
■
2 Z
<
Z 1
y1
i
s
'�'n uv��f�ls'��lu'�lR�II'6� rrsa�� '�ss''ii• ��
IN•L�I�M,: I. J� R�rTi��
s• •
VOL: j
j ..
7 '
j EVAT:ON 4
7 J�`
` i i
.4 ,'\rte• J'�.
tR'i> HEAR
CITY OF
®, RANCHO CUCNNIONGA
PL ANNA \G DiVISDN
C�
NORTH
, �t� On % �Zat gm t
mom
EX IBU: SCALE:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMCYGA
INITIAL STUDY 0
PART I - PROJECT INFO_KkTION SHEET - To be completed by applicant
Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $67.00
For all projects requiring environmental review, th.�_s
form must be completed and submitted to the Development
Review Committee through the department where the
project application is made. Upon receipt of this
application, the Environmental Anal,sis staff will prepare
Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review
Committee will meet and take action no later than ten
(10) -days before the public meeting at which time the
project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of
three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi-
ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration
*:rill be filed, 2) The project will have a significant
environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report
will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report
should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa-
tion concerning the proposed project.
PROJECT TITLE:
Tentative Tract Nos. 12318
and 12318 -1
APPLICANT'S NAME,
ADDRESS, TELEPHONE:
Lewis Homes of
California,
1156 N. Mountain
Ave., P.O_ Box 670, Upland,
CA 91786 (714)
985 -0971
NAME, Ai,JRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED
CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Mr. Richard Lewis
Address and phone given above.
LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.)
7397 Haven Avenue, Rancho Cucamnaa
T_.ISi 'ETHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND
FEDERAL, AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS:
WID (sewer and water) , Foothill Fire Protection District, San
Bernardino County Soils Erosion and Dust Control District (dust abatement)
I -1
L'J
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: 70 single family attached
hoes on 16ts ranajR fro= 3100 to 6750 sa -ft.
ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND. SQUARE FOOTAGE. OF EXISTING AND
PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 9.50 acres
DESCRIBE THE ENVIR0NMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE
INCLUDING INFORMATI0N Or TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES),
ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE
OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY
EXISTING S^RUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS):
Topography: 2 % -3% gentle slope, north to south.
The
cc
east
no trees.
the
Existing lava use: vincraiu. _
Use of surrounding properties: 4000 sa_.ft. detached units (12317 an
12317 -1) to the North; existing single family developm_nt to the West
scenic: Not applicable per Terra
Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series
of cumulative actions, which although individual3y small,
may as a whole have significant environmental impact?
Pic. This project is a portion of the Terra vista Planned Co==unity
for which an EIR has already been certified.
0 I -2
i.
a
WILL THIS PROJECT:
YES NO
X 1. Create a substantial change in ground
contours?
X 2. Create a substantial change �'n existing
noise or vibration?
xs. Create a substantial change in demand for
municipal services (police, fire, water,
sewage, etc.)?
X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or
general plan designations?
x 5. Remove any existing trees? flow many?
_ x 6. Create the need for use or disposal of
potentially hazardous saterials such as
toxic substances, flammables or explosives?
Explanation of any YES answers above:
IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of
residential units, complete the form on the
next page.
CERTIFI(NTION: I hereby certify that the statements
furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the
data and information required for this initial evaluation
to the of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and
information presented are true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional
information may be required to be: submitted before an adequatg
evaluation can be made by the DevelopmentrReview Committee.
L HOMES F CAUFORNIA
Date - Signatures �� w
Title Authorized Agent
I -3
11
RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION
The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
lanning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school
�r
district to accommodate the proposed residential development.
Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Tentative Tract NJ. 12318 and 12318 -1
Specific Location of Project:
PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL
1. Number of single 26 44 70
family units: _
2. Number of multiple
family units: 0 0
3. Date proposed to
begin construction: '7-83
4. Earliest date of
accupanc.,r : 11 -83
Model #
and # of Tentative
Bedrooms Price Range
Plan 1 - 1 + Der. $ 78,900
Plan 2 _ 23R $ 80:900
Plan 3 - 3 SR $ 87,900
Total
1-4 _
El
RESOLUTION NO. *
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12318 & 12318 -1
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12318 & 12318 -1, hereinafter "Map"
submitted by Lewis Homes, applicant, for the pu pose of subdividing the real
property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San. Bernardino,
State of California, described as a residential subdivision of 9.5 acres of
land into 74 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public
hearing and action on June 22, 1983; and
WHEREAS, the City Planner has
to all conditions set forth in the
reports; and
recommended approval of the Map subject
Engineering and Planning Division's
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the
Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence
presented at the public hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga does resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in
regard to Tentative Tract No. 12318 & 12318 -1 and the Map thereof:
(a) applicable interim and proposed general and specific
plans;
(b) consistent
t with all applicable interim tand proposed
general and specific plans;
(c) The site is physically suitable for the type of
development proposed;
(d) The design of the subdivision is no;: likely to cause
substantial environmental damage and avoidable
injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat;
(e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious
public health problems;
(f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict
with any easement acquired by the public at large,
now of record, for access through or use of the
property within the proposed subdivision.
El
Resolution No.
Page 2
(g)
That this project
the environment
issued.
will not create adverse impacts on
and a Negative Declaration is
SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Man No. 12318 & 12318 -1 a copy of which
is attache hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following
conditions and the attached Standard Conditions:
PLANNING DIVISION
1. Deatils for the design of the Recreation Area shall
be provided in the Landscapc and Irrigation Plans.
2. Openings in the block wall or open -work fencing
(e.g., wrought iron) shall be provided at the end of
all side -on cul -de -sacs along Haven Avenue to the
satisfaction of the City Planne% If fencing is
used, landscaping shall be provided on both sides.
3. Whenever the regulations of the Terra Vista
Community Plan differ from the standard conditions,
the Community Plan regulations shall supersede those
of the standard conditions.
4. Eliminate parking spaces at end of side -on
cul -de -sacs and replace with landscaping.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
5. Prior to recordation, a Notice of Intention to form
and /or join landscape and lighting districts or
other maintenance entity acceptable to the City
Engineer shall be filed with the City Council. The
engineering costs involved in the formation of the
district or other vehicle shall be borne by the
developer. This shall include maintenance of
perimeter landscape parkways.
6. Construction of the Church Street bridge across Deer
Creek shall be postponed to coincide with
development on the east side of the Channel.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 1383.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
11
E
8v,.
Herman Rempel, Chairman is
Resolution No,
Page 3
2-
ATTEST• — —
Sacretary of the ? anning Commission
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of ti
Cucamonga, do hereby cErtifY
reguiariy irtrod::ced, passed,
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a
on the 22nd day of Junp, 1983,
AYES: COMMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSiONERS:
ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
11
E
;e Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
by the followinc vote -to -wit:
E
11
O
P
r
6
0
2 CP
O
n
O [{l
W
N
9
V
n
e
O
O
C
u
N
v► "
L
y 0V
Yv1 &
6 O ^
6 J
S
(� O
�
Y • E
LqA
a
OL
�L
96r^
�dw
a
V
V
A
N
N r-
F
pp +y�
•n 1
d
v
i 1 L O O
L
l w
Y E N
y
C �• L
G
l-
>�r
L G L
n
r
G
d-
L A% V_ L L
^
= N} C
O
^ P
a= y
y L
d
= V O
q
O
S d
T
P-
d
=
r
A
��
V
r
w
N
v N=
T
N
V
G L
9
d
A
C
6
-O
Y A
NU=zt
NA
�p
B•'Tp
^
G2
VA
V A
�•
N
rC
A.°rL
VGA
U
dALV
N
yVG
pjL
Va
F. � r
A�O.
d�0
-e.�
W
a L
y
p
w
l�
a
G C
L
O
r
OS`O
q O
>V
aP4
O
AW •N 4°
n
Mr
VqA
� =C9
Yd
Ol
W6
`
�A
LV
�P
>oc
�-
CL
n
2�
Q -�
t O
+ r✓
a C
-
A C^
O +� S
Q I
A
C
A^
O d PC
C= r N
A
n
a
A
LOC-
A
a_
U N O
q`-
d
p^ y �
C
6
W
r t.•
u A y r°
L
0
a
E{
n9r
006
yl CVQd
� ^9
A N
�L
LLN
L=
Y>r
}JC
C-
^i
C.Ar
a -d
i.
.A�
Ad
L
Yl a'Nw
A.A..
°'bp
Lw
p� N
L01r
'�v Pq
rYN
N„
PY
wN
Ly
9V
OAW
yC
VO
^
N .
N
r
d
u6 G0
y =C
r� °C
NT
MLA
V.
d ^Ay
A °
CN
rye -S
�'L
J
M{'
1dw
Nt LL_
w
C6�w
6�n`°
80
97L
O
NV
d? lrr
-A>E
w.
r
6i�
it
°i0
.L.'P =w Hq
Tdw
l0
•,T
•
adE PO
la'-
y}¢5
r
K`A
l)
A'+�
L
^
LdL O'QVL
'EF
d
�Y
y J
b
b n=
M
HL MO
NAA
a V
w 9 n d P
y V d
n �
Q
6 6t 0.
aN6-
aA�m
tO
h'O•N
n
\\\
A
1
O
P
r
6
0
2 CP
O
n
O [{l
W
N
9
V
n
e
O
O
C
u
N
v► "
L
y 0V
Yv1 &
6 O ^
6 J
e
S
(� O
�
Y • E
LqA
a
OL
�L
96r^
�dw
LL
Tj C r
V
A
9nA
v C
pp +y�
w�
ti L a
C A}
O
a q
n C�
C a 9 a
V 9
O w Y
Y
= N} C
O
a n
a= y
6 O
C
O
S d
T
P-
d
C
��
W
a c
-O
gJ
`
d}`
rC
A.°rL
VGA
U
dALV
N
yVG
pjL
Va
�A1aAO
A�O.
d�0
-e.�
W
a L
y
p
w
l�
a
G C
^ N E
r.9
q O
yA
ONN
-yOn
OwV
n
2�
Q -�
t O
+ r✓
a C
-
A C^
O +� S
Q I
A
C
A^
O d PC
C= r N
P
n
a
q
LOC-
a_
C
a
E{
006
to--,
N .
N
r
d
N�IN
6
ro
e
0.
pCr ry d u V O L U T i
L � y
c T q
A
�•A.
Y U p C t U y Y � y
N^
_
`v �-i`
p yEEF ,p O
12609 V�'V =O
qO A
—'V
VdO
C � � <
vN.>O
C t
v C q O
N c
i
c c
y-
o A ^ a
�a
Y O
r M'u
V
Lao G Po-
PL
¢ N C q
UEY'\' CV 9
Y
O
yq C�
C O i L C U y
J,�E
q °
c
L q✓aA
yu�E
N E P N
T W
•'• V O L
<_
oL
O P
V j L
V
O
E
� O L
LO'Aa?�N 60y
C
C � °
\a
AA
G
q��aa�v Ny�^Q
cq.cF
AL
9FYL NdV+q
SIOa
° a
d C O
q
u
n N
M
N
oqL _
oo_� -m ^amc
>aye
O O
T
6
<a�6ta
K
SI
L;
w
Y
A
a°
9
T V
L O
n
V
-L
O �
L C
o �
NL.,
R V
d
C
io
V�
oA
C
V
m
O
^
c
a
N
O
O
S
L
N
9
N
e
n
m
r
0
yu
E
v
n
a
G
w
E .
O�
V O
v P
✓ V
L
d
r✓
^ S
z L
v
C
J q
6 �
d
v o
E
E u
A y
q
a
L t
im
N q
9 C
n
N C
V
L
G.
V
N r
O
nva
^ c L
A
VI P
Vf
y O
P� ^
t
i 4 C r
6
�I
u
°c °u
w
ga
d
L a ^
= P6
QA L
N � N
L P✓ C
c
iJat
dL N'o
n Ne
4�
°c
S 9'J L R
o v o a
A r
^ ° S
q ✓ t O
C O
aV✓C_
^�E
C o M
r y q
L
� ✓yv
a V
Pyy j,J
`J d
V O �
N�
c c as
T O � ✓ c
i
Y P
A c
d A
C V
V
N O
C
r ✓
A y
P^
O
V
F �
a
E ✓ z
Vim. C
a
^ N y
r �aq
N` u
V
y O p
L
c o r
PyE
L p
� � d
d
t
6
r
aa.
r
O
9
v
C
u
O
9
q
_T
V
n
n
a
r
u
w
Y
n
6
6
O
7
d
m
O
L d
Y �
O ^ O C
6
N C Pq
r
L Y
u 4q
N p
Y L
✓ ya
LL d
A ° w
y TpC
Na P
L•+CN
.o u
^ N 9
r ^ L c
N C ]C[^
� O o
C y �
_ d
L L
Y L
O O
A q
q N T
N = L L
Q1L o up°
ay o�Nq
^N p^
�Ly
L ^
^T Vim°
O
C f p y d
_ m uo++u
6 9 r L N O A
f
0
G=
^ C
y
F.L
n
^ L
m r
O
r O
A
u
E
C
vA
i
i
.L.
V
L
ce
O
V L
V
d -^
a E
O
M °
Y
^ y
ac
C
r� v
Y
C
d
Ey q�
V O ^J
d A ^
coy
A � a
Nia
C O q
n L N
O j
.ui.c da
9
CZC
� O
.V.. V
O V p C
C r � p
N E N
d C
q t O l
O O
nL n
° L c
q „ O
N T ^
Ta T
iv .o
y a
l` =P
7;;
6 E�6
P O n
N E
u =m
i] W6
riY
Pn
d L
O.
c q E o
q p L
n p 6 N
C q PJ
y n�
P
L y a g
� U
< L O q
C L d �-
m
.ne
N V
a t Y
9
J Y q
Y
m7o °
,7; ^ p
t N 6 A
u�
J
W
W 1� C
O
O y
OLgbOrTi
iJAL
cN
O T
pdL e
uJ T`or
ca o
✓' a � G
m
C9 �J
�°iaAHE
q y g V O P
O PTyc
.� ca
^ 9 d
6
q -9
6C�q y
-
H
�I
v d�GO
oagL A
q= O✓
u
6 N q) t N
O V
d G y
V L L
Ny LAY
E p�P4
�O E
N ^ < c
N C � �
6.0 A� f
L✓e PN�u
T O C
E-2
u ^c�du
y w� na i
c Q d n t g y
y L<
q�
„°tea .N q
a PO n✓ d
N p P= M
dd LV`
✓J oa
PPW LO W
NE ✓pl
WGNOUz
N'
O a g P M L
jSC
} N i �$` J C A E v
n^ C
qo r-d�
°�YL ADO -6
A E J y O a Ta
F N y✓Ny
V C
< V a y•r
a S
y N ✓
O r✓� O � q°
C d L a q
q j GGGGGG V p O
N A p
OJ ° pC ^N
dv eJ j0 °r
9 d ^ L G C
V PC'a` TJ q
=�6VaT N
A e V N P O
ue c�
Ycdw ncad.a.
E Y t
2 r^ L d J) M
a`�iMayi.c�=
El
N 0
I0
u
c•
V
V
�� -d O
N
C � � <
vN.>O
C t
v C q O
N c
c c
o A ^ a
Y O
r M'u
V
¢ N C q
c
yu�E
N E P N
T W
•'• V O L
O P
V j L
O
� O L
C � °
G
AL
° a
d C O
q
u
N
O O
T
6
<a�6ta
K
SI
L;
w
Y
A
a°
9
T V
L O
n
V
-L
O �
L C
o �
NL.,
R V
d
C
io
V�
oA
C
V
m
O
^
c
a
N
O
O
S
L
N
9
N
e
n
m
r
0
yu
E
v
n
a
G
w
E .
O�
V O
v P
✓ V
L
d
r✓
^ S
z L
v
C
J q
6 �
d
v o
E
E u
A y
q
a
L t
im
N q
9 C
n
N C
V
L
G.
V
N r
O
nva
^ c L
A
VI P
Vf
y O
P� ^
t
i 4 C r
6
�I
u
°c °u
w
ga
d
L a ^
= P6
QA L
N � N
L P✓ C
c
iJat
dL N'o
n Ne
4�
°c
S 9'J L R
o v o a
A r
^ ° S
q ✓ t O
C O
aV✓C_
^�E
C o M
r y q
L
� ✓yv
a V
Pyy j,J
`J d
V O �
N�
c c as
T O � ✓ c
i
Y P
A c
d A
C V
V
N O
C
r ✓
A y
P^
O
V
F �
a
E ✓ z
Vim. C
a
^ N y
r �aq
N` u
V
y O p
L
c o r
PyE
L p
� � d
d
t
6
r
aa.
r
O
9
v
C
u
O
9
q
_T
V
n
n
a
r
u
w
Y
n
6
6
O
7
d
m
O
L d
Y �
O ^ O C
6
N C Pq
r
L Y
u 4q
N p
Y L
✓ ya
LL d
A ° w
y TpC
Na P
L•+CN
.o u
^ N 9
r ^ L c
N C ]C[^
� O o
C y �
_ d
L L
Y L
O O
A q
q N T
N = L L
Q1L o up°
ay o�Nq
^N p^
�Ly
L ^
^T Vim°
O
C f p y d
_ m uo++u
6 9 r L N O A
f
0
G=
^ C
y
F.L
n
^ L
m r
O
r O
A
u
E
C
vA
i
i
.L.
V
L
ce
O
V L
V
d -^
a E
O
M °
Y
^ y
ac
C
r� v
Y
C
d
Ey q�
V O ^J
d A ^
coy
A � a
Nia
C O q
n L N
O j
.ui.c da
9
CZC
� O
.V.. V
O V p C
C r � p
N E N
d C
q t O l
O O
nL n
° L c
q „ O
N T ^
Ta T
iv .o
y a
l` =P
7;;
6 E�6
P O n
N E
u =m
i] W6
riY
Pn
d L
O.
c q E o
q p L
n p 6 N
C q PJ
y n�
P
L y a g
� U
< L O q
C L d �-
m
.ne
N V
a t Y
9
J Y q
Y
m7o °
,7; ^ p
t N 6 A
u�
J
W
W 1� C
O
O y
OLgbOrTi
iJAL
cN
O T
pdL e
uJ T`or
ca o
✓' a � G
m
C9 �J
�°iaAHE
q y g V O P
O PTyc
.� ca
^ 9 d
6
q -9
6C�q y
-
H
�I
v d�GO
oagL A
q= O✓
u
6 N q) t N
O V
d G y
V L L
Ny LAY
E p�P4
�O E
N ^ < c
N C � �
6.0 A� f
L✓e PN�u
T O C
E-2
u ^c�du
y w� na i
c Q d n t g y
y L<
q�
„°tea .N q
a PO n✓ d
N p P= M
dd LV`
✓J oa
PPW LO W
NE ✓pl
WGNOUz
N'
O a g P M L
jSC
} N i �$` J C A E v
n^ C
qo r-d�
°�YL ADO -6
A E J y O a Ta
F N y✓Ny
V C
< V a y•r
a S
y N ✓
O r✓� O � q°
C d L a q
q j GGGGGG V p O
N A p
OJ ° pC ^N
dv eJ j0 °r
9 d ^ L G C
V PC'a` TJ q
=�6VaT N
A e V N P O
ue c�
Ycdw ncad.a.
E Y t
2 r^ L d J) M
a`�iMayi.c�=
El
N 0
I0
u
W I rPt V ✓ S yG -LiC ^ c'✓a
s � •1 � I R� u d ¢ .O
h, � � m w' q I;� d A fLa ✓ �
�`N'L °cN I 4 ✓ ° ` � Tn u
I n q 1
` ✓ �v° � o � �. mow'° N ,^ � �o ` L �
qS p Vr°a V L 6q CC .L°r t� ✓N JgiN z= y t .L.r
6 V x
E S N u n o o V vr'O 7 G
n.� 9 ^ G L ° T • O G V d i c L a g >p d � U
✓ q V y y N ' 6r G L V � nOj U q V L
O O
C d •- EG ^ E d p i t• J E Q J L
E�`pT N V V O I L- OVC LL ✓LLi d0 dOG ^ V LL
> d `'a L l N d A .y q V � m L 0. L c L L q2 � ✓
NNN9 N� V yrN � 9y0 V! VyiJ C
d0 d d =o. G �O a,CV LL- grVC GzY d L V
✓ �L O P "u � ^ V G L OG T'Y C V u V Y J ^.
A O �_ d✓ N- V^ - j C ✓ C
ONw GN 9L NO N � u A9� GCy Z V q LNIQ^
✓ N I o q °= N y Y L = � C` N d W V a Q L _ O d `
£ G L NVLL y. LV V 4OY .L.. O C>.L
C- 0
Z,-, L
!6C C L EpO Q ~ N' LAN NL IO A V.nn- O AOggL
V-0
9> d N CEO OY V 6L 6qV YI ✓
VE p = Y d0\Y CL q6 V S(9 VO
O OL PE Ld0-
NOS -A Gc� LL
R 6Gm O U 6A V \Y 62 LaV A H46✓ 0
G
A
i NI \I �j l�
IE
a`o �e_¢ cuo = 'L d,vaL cc Pc P •-L o- c- .+ d u ^v
9 I C 9 PLO. 9 d N V C > M♦ q L L
V q
O i J O C
y6C ^t] RV�L J�dO v C,G A C C NV rOnC = C =q
N A d V �• V t V V N ✓ L v C A O _ O V C
G O NL V N ^ _• q V ..' N V - Y w V G N L w N_ J[ V C ^'• d V L q
P �✓M
A ^c oa
O � � V u g P d -J N /J L V✓ ^ ✓- O q N^ V
L•'rCA OV L da0 ^r^eP cv�a� q PE V �� dt O dN'•L+
d I T V �?} EOL FU° Z >- _✓ c °✓ l d J g q �• 61 � < 4= q R P ^ dw 9 y L T
CLV Vd 9 ✓OV ^_ VLL<i0 � ✓Z r�N °'VO LLd r q6
'"^' y d m L dVd o �d .- mow^ Nv_ ° u ✓d
'. LOt+_Y iL•° °' VA s R a - q° oo n�°r �L..- �Pi d dN e�
CJ p + 4 N °r o•cq L+c o.°e✓ -R e`. L ° o c ° du `< L- L
P d d o V O q c ✓- E y q _ d tL''
c�qd
z° 2.2 o °
Eo JO c` o N.-. ud LPq+y
EyJ ✓G.°_ I` uc L m•°+ itEO. �R D -� PLC .°�c� .Jrrc Ld9E
{ c
3.5 C O p P ^• N O c L V '� ° d c c ^ ✓� ,ne
q- dS pi NV y �C q.r 4V Tan dp^ T n
tJ"O Y.yP W qq�� .aOV r �� > - -q RCG' a".N ^� OO ✓V
vd ° O -• w. �' Rd G6 ^A>`> R O}. OM.°.. 7�`. VL'e d ATaA
O-
w ^J L �� f� n P� •p°0 0 6•+ A T P C' C 9 6 q Y V ^ d V rGO V � n 9 LL C !'
REV O NO � `J C` O✓ C�-r ^L ^e \. O -�
n a M w
, `� Y -- m N =:�- o R R =q`> ne == �_t' r` `N R .°.: d nre .e✓ R
.+C�GN ^O tiD•°+ tiNG NN9 2 «w 6^ JLE�
i
M
`
T Lq
PdC
Pl0 uay
LOq -
C: �rW
�JCOC CN
pp�� � �
a o
c c
-. � c q
o✓ e.—
o'
coo L
V' 1
d
9� c
`o q L ro v
l �� y
.L..
° O✓ C
O
_
P d d
N
C q o •' —
L p i C
N �'
O i m
y E
V
m
c E✓
v
S
c
v
L A O O
an d
y` i
� c
_ j am✓ i'O
g V n N P
.Vi
L C
dU
C
PVO d)
TSB
.r. O
P9ln
_
N
q U
O
y
0 0 Z 9
W V O q
J F.
q_
✓ d
a d
E K� 6
L
_ q
!
y
`Y
_Y T'
q
L ` L,'-
Nq y
Lq
WWy^JL
^l•
•yNLVL�
L
q
�d
W.W.
V
y O
p
V
V.L+✓
O N
j
J�
q O d
L
a E L
E O
6
o
L
-
L
c
N c
n E
o 'O $
'^
v E° d
";22
d
T 4
d6
=Va
C WCN� pN
OpCLOL
Wp
WO`
ddpO^^u q
y O
n
P p n
Q
i1
a2 �_
J
N—
C`yl
J prn L V '^ C
v
q` E
.� O '^ N G a ✓ q O J
y y
�
^
N
d
a
Mr d�
nu c� u0i dd9
C9i
CT_Ogq�C
rC
N
—O'ON
�.L.a'.L
G1
J L
= O n
l q
P> Y V
v P O L •
9 q G
C N L
q
L_
L
C
=
O
N q
q
y L
6C
d
L P P
P
n o ✓
� q q P
OI
N
p !
O
—
L
✓ l t C
n O
O y! V Oyu
V C v' N
='��
-"� O✓ C
�
p
C C
L d
l
e� .��[ �+^ ✓ Y
Pd y
_
� VN
^��_
NN �
'q
P.a
LLJ
NO O
ny ✓`V
LI
—r
n m OY
6 L C'r
C N TAN
.5';S
N
—i^II
V N 9N 6gg0
Onr•E —L
LLmSIG
60V VO Pq
O 1
y
d0�
� aO
O
i
W J
P�yPC
VP
vd LQ
P
VPV
d —Od
aQ�
OyLV
L
t
q
-,V
CV O� gdyY
>ZG V
C
O
9 V M
D✓
6•
Ld
i^ _
�
LO
-, V O
q
N•L•S6V
C as G
>
y�4o
� =y`
d—
va E°
a
y°ceN
V
r
a
g O C 6
L% N
y 0
4^
V C
10 C
Omer
6 y
q
•r VL •
C
Z
Lu
q
VO-
v yL
V C q_y
dE nq o rQ
Q"✓m °
° �'
TO
� c
o
�qa .
pd
�
_
'^
n^ r r 5 z.
N
d
� n• dad
q
y l E
d p
q a
j
—�
v y
E
qFO
iVLiy C dVd
v aC O
=q
—
°
TPP
Or'
q
N y> d
n y— r � C� !
O O V
✓
d
—_ 9
V r
C° d
y
_ _
u•ju'j
Orqq a —A�f
•L+U
L
VVP�
_
OF>•aq
N` t
(
Od
tr
6J a
Csa_
Si
aOgy
L
NV
LOyCO
Md
�O
G % �Qu
✓S�o
yv•EOr� -- N7c—
`µ
O O W
O q
V
O
O
_ b' .Z-
V r
q
✓✓
I u
L Oar
01
q` O V r
6=
yj
V •O u
W
P P
N
N
P E
q.
yO d O
d V! c
O
q
[V
0�1
✓
Odr
rc —qp
9_
ZL1rN6
Cil
rCW� C OnaWN
6syVL N
c
L
6ya
W VV
»
°dui
N
WNO
dl
11
^I
^I
^I
I
q
L
II
O VIM
=�
W
C
u
C TJ
O N
� L
d
O 7
Y
2 y
^
N =
W
O
•n
C N 9
6 L �•
d u q
O r
C N
c e �-
r V
9 y
r
O'O
p a �
a C C
D r
i
9 23
a
^
N C r q
q n N
T� r
= e tai r
^ i
a o
Z 6 UO
O� l .••I
1Jn { I
I
I
NW
�i
. -•o•�•
^�> qt
c.`N
ooh
a
t
a
Ls.usa
`CaD•L
Ll
v O
�C•
`
°
a
5
c
y S•
O O
O y
W
c r
�
9
O
C y
9
W
•
O
I
I
I
r O
_N J
r U y
C
;�
C r^ u`
�
N'"D
N i •n
L
= O
w
q
P V p r
O
N
P
V V n S r
r C
r
wr
I
yFC
•^
p
v
> L
`
�
d
N�G
qE
wg
�
t
_
n noa
`a
o
2
.�
Y I
q¢
C •Ni. 0
9•`
� a
q 0
r r
6
GI
r PN^
C_
vi
cvo�
L
Ew
CF:
O
OCC
O^
rV
`
•�
1�
1
^^
CLIP
^
CND
�9 d�y
A
CuC
O
L^
CV
'•L
X�
_
v
03
O
O
q
V C
T
pQ
wg1OJ�
Vr
Pqr
aL
D L
�V'
Ta
LL
'
9yc
dQl
� •
.ry
yq
J d w C
V
€r••
v
�°�o
� a"
L
c
".N.
o19ao a
.a
•ceu✓
d
Y L_
D.L
I L'
6V0
HE
7
CC
PF
�•'•n0
O.aCd
C
LU
u
J/
O
q"
OCi
O
.
°
•
I O
Ca
.cv 4qr
cN
N�
i^
d
9
NZ
Y•
yU O
paCN
�}
•
dLV
I l 9
=
Lc�
c ac
pc it
>
Pd
yr par
O�
I
I V V
Ir
�¢ .• 6 U
6 V r
6 q
Q O L
L 2
T
V
V^
L.
C
L
...
WY�q
••. tp0
W
..
N•� -
,°e
r
N
.Vi•
6 N U
q W« N O
O r O
Q V
C
IL
C
u
C TJ
O N
� L
d
O 7
Y
2 y
^
N =
W
O
•n
C N 9
6 L �•
d u q
O r
C N
c e �-
r V
9 y
r
O'O
p a �
a C C
D r
i
9 23
a
^
N C r q
q n N
T� r
= e tai r
^ i
a o
Z 6 UO
O� l .••I
O >•9
9
O
.• q N w.
.
d •
Ll
v O
�C•
`
°
a
5
c
y S•
O O
O y
W
c r
�
9
O
C y
W
I
T`�'
C
;�
h
�
N'"D
N i •n
�
�-
w
wr
I
yFC
•^
p
v
> L
`
�
d
N�G
qE
wg
�
t
_
n noa
`a
o
2
.�
Y I
q¢
C •Ni. 0
9•`
� a
q 0
u
6
GI
r PN^
C_
vi
cvo�
L
Ew
CF:
O
OCC
O^
`
•�
1�
1
^^
-_
CND
A
CuC
O
L^
n•
'•L
_
v
03
O
O
q
V C
T
pQ
C
Nip
aL
D L
Ta
LL
NI
=
.ry
u
J/
O
q"
OCi
°
•
9D
�QJ
2
y V
I l 9
=
p g L C
W l W
^ 9
L c
1 6
q N
O�
I
I V V
6 q
�¢ .• 6 U
6 V r
6 q
Q O L
L 2
u
C TJ
O N
� L
d
O 7
Y
2 y
^
N =
W
O
•n
C N 9
6 L �•
d u q
O r
C N
c e �-
r V
9 y
r
O'O
p a �
a C C
D r
i
9 23
a
^
N C r q
q n N
T� r
= e tai r
^ i
a o
Z 6 UO
O� l .••I
f
O >•9
9
O
.• q N w.
.
d •
Ll
v O
�C•
`
°
a
5
c
y S•
O O
O y
W
c r
�
�
ova
�-
oy
•^
p
> L
`
F
a"
_
n noa
`a
o
r rd
N°
6
GI
r PN^
C_
r
cvo�
L
Ew
CF:
O
OCC
O^
`
•�
1�
1
I
f
O W C 4! L O Y N C C ^
L L t V G L O Y > O
� u V
N a^ -J
q d • S] Y �!
V q YY 9n ^N I ✓Or q ^ \� a q �� O Y
O a .4
— -• qtZ Y gVYicO 6L C9 ,,J{ N Q ^ q
q Y^ Y Y W I r ^ Y
V
V I CCU � L 9 C Y GI L Y d
Y y v C O O O v Y¢ S] O Y^ V L C v
L l f iL u � .LU O C u E O
Q
w V q G
.L+i.L..Y
-
V� OWN O�uq C C
� �' `>n I =W q^ rP VV LN
_ � O I f. Y
>-
jJ
rti v
0
10
e
dL
9
Cc
lV„
9
�9V
d
OV
`F6
,p
d
o
c
r
U
L
^
c ^_ L
c c
oar
Y4Y
d O
9
>
=
=
u
`
O
v
W
O`
L^ �•
O
C n
`OL
Ly
Lw-
d>+
L L
O
N
j
n
dln
`V
u
vv
N y
-
c
P_d
a 2
y V
q
N C
y
O J d
<
_
y
a
L9
NAY
Y
9y
d0
,yY
�q •d
6VL
a u
�
r
^ y q
°9co
o
Ld O1
c d
L
ov cu°
Y
Lora
�o
ys
Cl —N
6 ^N
� iLD
2
<6
Leoa
6JU�
O.
O W C 4! L O Y N C C ^
L L t V G L O Y > O
� u V
N a^ -J
q d • S] Y �!
V q YY 9n ^N I ✓Or q ^ \� a q �� O Y
O a .4
— -• qtZ Y gVYicO 6L C9 ,,J{ N Q ^ q
q Y^ Y Y W I r ^ Y
V
V I CCU � L 9 C Y GI L Y d
Y y v C O O O v Y¢ S] O Y^ V L C v
L l f iL u � .LU O C u E O
Q
w V q G
.L+i.L..Y
-
V� OWN O�uq C C
� �' `>n I =W q^ rP VV LN
_ � O I f. Y
>-
jJ
rti v
0
10
e
El
P
LJ
CITY OF R. ANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 22, 1983
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACTS 12364 &
2 6--_ - LEWIS HOMES - A Dotal residential development of
sinale farm y etached homes on 71 lots ranging from
4600 square feet to 11,590 square feet on 14.4 acres of
land generally located on the south side of Base Line,
east of Deer Creek Channel - APN 1077 - 091 -02.
I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Requested: Approval of subdivision maps, site plans,
an a evations
B. Purpose: Development of 71 single family detached homes
C. Location: South -,ae of Base Line, east of Deer Creek Channel
X i It "A")
D. Parcei Size: 14.4 acres
E. Existing Zoning= PC 81 -01 (Terra Vista)
F. rxiStinq Land Use: Vineyard
G. Project Density: 4.9 du /ac
H. Surroundin
Land Use
and Zonin :
Vista)
Nort -
South -
Vineyar
Vineyard;
PC
PC
8 -
81 -01
(Terra
(Terra
Vista)
East -
Vineyard;
PC
81 -01
(Terra
Vista)
West -
Vineyard;
PC
81 -01
(Terra
Vista)
I. Planned Cosmiuni *_ Land d Use Desi naa tion�s
gum Residen r_du/ac) a:id Low- Medium
roJect ite -Me tial
(4 -8 du /ac)
North - Park. Site
South - Medium -High Residential (14 -24 du /ac)
East - Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac)
West - Medium Residential (4-14 de /ac)
ITEM C
Tentative Tracts 12364 & 12364 -1 /Lewis Homes
Planning Commission Agenda
June 22, 1983
Page 2
I. Site Characteristics: Slopes southward at approximately a
20,-3% grade, contains a Eucalyptus windrow along Base Line
frontage, no structures.
K. Applicable Reculations: Terra Vista Community Plan permits one
dwelling per 3,000 sq. ft. minimum lot to approximately 7,200
sq. ft. maximum lot in a conventional subdivision in the Medium
and Lora - Medium Residential designations.
II. ANALYSIS•
A. General: These two tracts comprise a single development with
approximately one -half of the total lots between 5,500 and
6,500 square feet in size. Therefore, the project density of
4.9 du /ac is at the lower end of the Medium (4 -14 du /ac) and
Low Medium (4 -8 du /ac) ranges for this site. The tracts have
bean designed with a variety of setbacks, lot widths and
depths, and lot patterns in conformance with the Community Plan
text. Access will be provided from Spruce Street via Street
"A" and secondary access will be provided to the east via
Street "G" in the future.
B. Design Review Commmittee: The Committee recommended approval
subject to the foil owing revisions:
o Greater variation in street design and got pattern.
o Pull 2 -story homes on Lots 7 and 24 further away from
Spruce Street and provide additional architectural
treatment an rear and corner side elevations.
The applicant has incorporated these changes into the project
as shown in the attached exhibits.
C. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study, as
completed by the applicant, is attached for your review. Based
upon completion of Part II of the initial Study, staff has
found that no significant adverse impacts not addressed in the
Environmental Impact Report wiil occur-
Ill. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the Terra Vista
P anned Community Plan and General Plan. The project will not be
detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant adverse
environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use, building
design, and subdivisions, together with recommended conditions, are
in compliance with the Zoning Ordinance and City standards.
E
4
El
11
E
Tentative Tracts 12364 & 12364 -1 /Lewis Homes
Planning Commission Agenda
June 22, 1983
Page 3
IV. CORRESPONDENCE' This item has been advertised as a public hearing
in The Oai y Report newspaper and the property posed. There are
no property owners other than Lewis Homes within 00 feet of the
project site. To date, no correspondence has been received either
for or against this project.
' slot
V. RECOMMENDATICd�: It is recommended that the Planning Commis
consi er al material and elements of this project. If after such
consideration the Commission can support the facts for finding and
conditions of approval, adoption of the attached a {esolution and
is uance of a Negative Declaration would be app op l
Respect-Tally s;4mitted,
Rick' Go3nez
City Planner
RG : DC:jr
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Area Development Plan
Exhibit "C" - Site Utilization /Natural Features
Exhibit "D" - Subdivision Map
Exhibit "E" - Site Plan
Exhibit "F" - Landscape Plan
Exhibit "G" - Grading Plan
Exhibit "H" - Elevations - 762 Series
Exhibit "i" - Elevations - 775 Series
Exhibit "J" - Elevations - 773 -3 Series
Exhibit "K" - Elevations - 794 Series
Exhibit "L" - Elevations - 794 -3 Series
Exhibit "M" - Corner Side Elevations
Initial Study, Part I
Resolution of Approval with Conditions
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCATIO`,GA
PLANNING DIVLS N
MAJOR GREENWAY
SYSTEM
••••• MAJOR TRAILS
K�
NORM
��4- r
TITLE= -
E`{HIBiT- _ SCALE= S ~
C
s� $lei � fill AYI{fYpfli ��v t v �.!'
M
N
CD
M
V
ZO
a z
0
z £„
Z x
<
u
a Q �
x
O
z
d i
� � O
W
V
Y_
Q
B
W
E
P t _. w� .;
7
w�.�•wm� »av�
\�.■, \ ■IJA� �YIV1il
a7M Wl
C
1 1 �
1 1 �
' 1
f
i S
O
U t
c
n �
� dtMM W
1
x n
a �c
1
A
1
1.1
�J
1
I
<
V-4
� <
Ra
M ®
C ,+■
e
� 1
C3
ly O i 7
yy S
tj
im
3 S
Z e21
y
f
X W ■ < e-3�
1
F 7�
0
C
1 1 �
1 1 �
' 1
f
i S
O
U t
c
n �
� dtMM W
1
x n
a �c
1
A
1
1.1
�J
.f s
��DA O wPi. �
Vl�lt� �aY11V. IOD���
..rte, a....a
• VL
jC6 M
c3 p C
11
°J
C
C V
,c
:7
V)
i� W
Y
�+ r'r!•,� .. ii a�i,T y,. W. �. 5 -��.4 �.yy.�•N1� _ '7
jC6 M
< 6V
40
Q
<
e
Fz <3
sa o
�r
=
o_
V
u
CP
Z �
<
Y
i
u
s
a
O > i
O
N �
�
. Y.
v
^ r
i
P i- z��t
� � W
c3 p C
11
°J
C
C V
,c
:7
V)
i� W
Y
�+ r'r!•,� .. ii a�i,T y,. W. �. 5 -��.4 �.yy.�•N1� _ '7
Y >�i YtLb
1:/Y
�_-�
I
i
It
.rn.wo•.m -roams
�.t7rf�/r Oq
� +wu suw:rmr c
adRA ��l
i
e L 3
<
,w
W
�
C
i J
<
nc73
C•-
.a
_ e
s �vG�3:I
1IIY
i .yi3
Wu
z igee
z
o ggL �
i
'. Y\
}9
I
i
It
.rn.wo•.m -roams
�.t7rf�/r Oq
� +wu suw:rmr c
adRA ��l
v
/t 4
ia "ti - -_
FC_
L - y-
�L1�1
s
n
i .•�
a
i
e L 3
qq t.f:
-C=
gat
C
i J
v
/t 4
ia "ti - -_
FC_
L - y-
�L1�1
s
n
i .•�
a
i
e L 3
i J
0
i7
0
Y
a
<
L
� !
i E1 � 4 1 l � \ • � =a� _ �
' � -• Ann �. K..r t�. i. --1
MM
i
Q1 d Q
L7�
1g
1
ve l
} i (Ij
II
7 tyC °a �•���0
i l • v ac°in.
r < aaC
t ailli •1 I � � V i
E r �' al` i�• y� � -�
'i
i r
• is � r _ 1 � e €1! w �
C
L
as � si
♦ i� e j !�k° ��ld` ;9a8�
`- jif[ �B�iF a ➢i
l�:kGx �KKK1� � ' 'V 6 yyyC^�..` ! J. �C' � �•y.,}��yp^ %�!
• &�' ��* � A -Va '.^• l •. . ley ` "•J,^Y ' J11' �i
:i
r
- f
1
es=
AT
1
1
ve l
} i (Ij
II
7 tyC °a �•���0
i l • v ac°in.
r < aaC
t ailli •1 I � � V i
E r �' al` i�• y� � -�
'i
i r
• is � r _ 1 � e €1! w �
C
L
as � si
♦ i� e j !�k° ��ld` ;9a8�
`- jif[ �B�iF a ➢i
l�:kGx �KKK1� � ' 'V 6 yyyC^�..` ! J. �C' � �•y.,}��yp^ %�!
• &�' ��* � A -Va '.^• l •. . ley ` "•J,^Y ' J11' �i
:i
r
- f
R � �
t
1
r
t _
Wit
y
Q
Z Wt
- O i si fl n �`•� J •1 - �_ V
1
+ �� �oRig i! t ' _ _
f} ty�,rj �' aa��ts •�
410, 91 Y' AC Y�'.rL•
I moo,
-Al it
.
-1
■9
s
3
{
z>
.F1
-1
■9
s
3
{
CC C
OK,
40
V3
ell
I Oil
till
o
t7-
ME
<
Q
>
Sip -
.-a
OK,
40
t7-
OK,
40
J—i
1 -1
L
2a
A
� oT€
i
SRr
pp t,
CE
O Y• ' _
tears. r a ° il<.Y y.r —• ,. 1_!$
"! _.� _. - AI39P���lw ;''�. �. `,. .�♦+F •_ _.anit Y1 ^e. r. �.rin •_. _ Y.i- _ ..:�l�l
L
R
4° G
F� r
Zk
E"
�• 1 0
t c ! O
L
x
y
t
f:
a
P
1/�
Z
F
ccQ.
F
F
Q
ou
F:
A
� oT€
i
SRr
pp t,
CE
O Y• ' _
tears. r a ° il<.Y y.r —• ,. 1_!$
"! _.� _. - AI39P���lw ;''�. �. `,. .�♦+F •_ _.anit Y1 ^e. r. �.rin •_. _ Y.i- _ ..:�l�l
L
R
4° G
F� r
Zk
E"
�• 1 0
t c ! O
L
x
y
t
f:
11
WI
-Q
a
N
1—i z
Z
cr
1 --L
T
Q
I --
W
a
r
Q z
W
T-1 F
<
i
II
i
MII
JII
wI
t
E
��N awl
r °
r °•
Y� f�
4r
c
3
i
YZ
C�
vz
a�
x
F g
..:
a �
l°
a
.a 4
77
ff 1
lie
�E
i
Ir,
C
I v:
wgav avvru
•IeSA Wl wrsv.��sa�aad r
z �
i
Z �M � iI _ i � _�_.�•_
.,
c
O � � <e�� � l� �'- °alp, • o/U : � `� � � � �I-,�I , . � �' - � -
yV i
gl
s All
5 ca E' � •i�� ��;� . _ 1 i i r.,`�� -r-, l� �1 rJ "1 -,- i �
M
-r r
tia ns �
% t
y
762-D
_ z
hyiv
it 1
C �{ ` rS�.rtinunrerr I
l
°r
i
i.
r
'..i -`
I ' ' 1- i r s-3 7171
" 07--,6-
El
�Vv
7M
CIA.:
Xf 4,.. 4f.
't,
-Irx;
Lie to It
-x D�z
El
tm
ED
13
19
El
rn
J J tD °U
FRONT ELEVATION
FRONT ELEVATION-
w:.
CI'PI OF
RANCHO CUCAi ON-GA
PLANNING DIVISION
r. v'�w''hlas
0
C �
NORTH
EXHIBIT- SCALE-�
0
MEN =Mm-
I
1 �1'
El
i 1.111 a
W
J
W
®I u
D
j N
®I F
W
®W
� J
Q
Q
W
Q
W
d
N
1
F
V
ddpofit oil
La \:}-:' arrMS maa ®���rrs o�Mw fa 7 l�
(ECE) I�
W
J
I/ E ® .
/ _ m
\` I� 9B
Us'
' fi •;,,fix- s'-`- y, ^p \..
s
to .
cc
r
gK_
Z ,� ♦: ya< .rte � : Y _.
y � � r+' �� ✓� y e � f >��-•� rrJ y.. i < _ _' '• L "tin. y r � ".
'. A �•.�4" \ ''•L� °Y%��Iw't if SuI 1 `� , yr 4JlN� ��r�
tt ~'.l ' y •�YS 'r1 y ® E ,"
'• � �y f.. •.S�Rtr��< � y v,+r.Y : -,i = - �.� �' T T �� `vim . '..
- �-... yati OS �fG�•• � rJ • L .. ® •l l�rc -�. � t
Q - "T. s ti - -� "!. c T c." ✓ .r
1 s - _ - _
•�.r„y �' ` _^�� - i. ii a S �v s'C s �`Y� d r. jC• s '7. -�.
AA
�'_�_ _. y.,. _r- 1 ^�- -y+L'1i"•.try •, _z. i3 ..v:'Jr �S17a.,r�.'i~. _
rr�.�
W t_.ti us
eel IEl E-2
ga>�e.sy ...,�v....seswe • i
v
7
/ V
a
us
us
L
w .
0
a
wr :t
cc.'.
o -
a
. 7
'1
y
C
a
. a
1Ig °T °�J
FRONT ELEVATION
opq
FRONT ELEVATION
CITY OF
R. "NCIO CU&,N 10:�GA
PL. VNNNl \'G Dl\rG0'\
FRONT ELEVATION
ITEM..
0
E
c �
NORTH
TITLE- J
EXHIBIT=
11
11
0
�iR1N!'�/yp Y9�
e{M awl
irwewao i �1{��
Q
N
Z
O
h
Q
W
J
W
W
O
N
h
LL
W
J
K
4
W
W
a
?l;
h
T
O
Q
G.7
:�
.'
-;:; ..
�
n
7
�
iw
a
:; ;
,.
'.�'.
\\. ,
.,.. '
r_
A...
...
'.:1'
:�
E.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
INITIAL STUDY
PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant
Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87,00
For all projects requiring environmental review, this
form must be completed and submitted to the Development
Review Committee through the department where the
Project application is made. Upon receipt of this
application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare
art II of the Initial Study. The Development Review
Committee will meet and take action no later than ten
(10) days before the public meeting at which time the
project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of
three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi-
ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration
will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant
environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report
will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report
should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa-
tion concerning the proposed project.
PROJECT TITLE: Tentative Tract No. 12364
APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Lewis Homes of California,
1156 N. Mountain Avenue, P.O. Box 670, Upian -
NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED
CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Mr. Richard Lewis
same address and telephone number as shown above.
LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.)
10900 East Base Line Road
LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL REGIONAL STATE Alm
FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING I SUCH PERMITS:
C.C.W.D. (sewer and water) , Foothill Fire Protection District, Ste"'
Bernardino County soil5 irosion and L'll5t Control D15triCt (dUSt abatement)
I-1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: 45 single family detached homes on lots
ranaina from 4600 sa.ft. to 10,530 sc.f*__ See attached letter for _
additional information.
ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND-SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND
PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 8.03 acres_
Existing Buildinas: 0
DESCRIBE THE EMIRON."iENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE
INCLUDING INFORMATION CN TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) ,
ANI,%1ALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE
OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY
EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS):
Tcpo: 2%-3% gentle slope north to south.
Use oI sourrounulnq pxvy—y:
Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series
of cumulative actions, which although individually small,
may as a whole have significant environmental impact?
No. This project is a portion of the Terra Visca Planned Community,
for which an EIR has alr-aady been c=ertified.
Tom. 2
I]
11
El
11
WILL THIS PROJECT:
YES NO
1 Create a substantial change in ground
contours?
2. Create a substantial chance in existing
noise or vibration?
X_ 3. Create a substantial change in demand for
m,anicipal services (police, fire, water,
sewage, etc.)?
1_ 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or
general plan designations?
5. Remove any existing trees? How many ?�_
V. —
: 6. Create the need for use or disposal of
potentially hazardous materials such as
toxic substances, fla enables or explosives?
Explanation of any YES answers nVwili require the removal of
IiL�ORT ??3T: I£ the project involves the construction e'_
residential units, complete the form on the
next page.
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements
furnished above and in the attached exhibits p
data and information required for this initial statements, and
to the best of my ability, and that the factso. the hest of my
o
information presented are true and cc
knowledge and belief. I further a derstand that additional
information may be required to be submitted before an adequate
evaluation can be made by the Development Review Co.^mittee.
LP�P� MES OF CALIFORNIA
2�I C- Signature �a-
Date
Titl e Authorized Agent
1-3
C
RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION
0
The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school
district to accommodate the proposed residential development.
Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Lewis Homes of California -Tract 12364
S_oecific Location of Protect: Soulth side of Base Lire Road, approx. 2840 ± feet
r east of Haven Avenue.
PHASE I PF.;,SE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL
1. Number of single
family units: 45 45
2. Number of multia_le
familv units:
3. Date proposed to
begin c.astruction:
4. Earliest date of
occupancy:
Model #
and # of Tentative
5. Bedrooms Price Rance
799 -3 bd= $85- 88,000
791 -3 bdrm $95- 98,000
775 -3 bdrm $98- 101,000
794 -4 bdrm $105- 108,000
Eel
6 -83
11 -83
12
10
11 _-
12
45
1-4
U
10
45
12 i
10
11
12
45
C �
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
to INITIAL STUDY
PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant
Environmental Assessn_ent Review Fee: $87.00
For all projects requiring environmental review, this
foria must be completed and submitted to the Development
Review Con=ittee through the department where the
project application is made. Upon receipt of this
application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare
Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review
Committee will meet and take action no later than ten
(10) days before the public meeting at which time the
project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of
three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi-
ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration
will be filed, 2) The project will have a 3igniiicant
environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report
will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report
should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa-
tion concerning the proposed project.
PROJECT TITLE: Tent tive T N 12364 -1
Lewis Homes of California,
APPLICANT'S ain A ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: 91786 714 985 -0973
1256 N. thow'�tain Avenue, P_O. Sox 670, UPl ,
NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED
CONCERNING THTS PROJECT: mr. Richard Lewis
same address and telephone numi�er shover afore
LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.)
10900 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga
APN —77--G - _.
LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND
FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS:
C. C.W.D. (sewer and water), Foothill Fire ProtectioncDistrict,SSan
abatemen'
0 I -1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Is
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: 26 single family detached homes on lots
ranging from 5200 sq.ft, to 11,590 sq.ft.
ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND - SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND
PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 6.37 acres
Existing Buildings: 0
Proposed Buildings: 50,248 sq.ft.
DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE
INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES),
ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL„ HISTORICAL- OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE
OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY
EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS):
Topo: 2 % -3% gentle slope north to south.
Plants: Existing grapevine and existing eucalyptus wind row along
case
Use
Is the project part of a larger proj.ict, one of a series
of emulative actions, which although individually small,
may as a whole have significant_ environmental impact?
No. This project is a portion of the Terra vista Planned Community,
for which an EIR has already been certified.
0
1 -2
® WILL THIS PROJECT:
YES NO
X 1. Create a substantial change in ground
contours?
X 2. Create a substantial change in existing
noise or vibration?
E
X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for
__,.Micipal services (police, fire, water,
sewage, etc.)?
X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or
--� general plan designations?
X 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? .70'!
X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of
-- potentially hazardous materials such as
toxic substances, flammables or explosives?
Explanation of any YES answers above:
IjApORTMM If the project involves the construction of
residential units, ccmplete the form on the
next page.
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements
furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the
data and information required for this initial statements, and
to the best of my ability, and that the facts,
information presented, are true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional
information may be required to be submitted before an adequate
evaluation can be made by the Development Review Committee.
2 wis aar�s q� FOINIA
Date -83 signature �lu� ✓� C��
Title Authorized Agcnt
1-3
RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION
The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school
district to accommodate the proposed residential development.
Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Lewis Homes cf California-Tract_ N0.12364 -1
Specific Location of Project: South side of Base Line Road approx. 2400 t feet east
of Haven Avenue.
PHASE I PnASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL
1. Number of single
family units: 26 26
2. Number of multiple
family units: 0 0
3. Date proposed to
begin construction: 6 -83
4. Earliest date of IV
occupancy: 11 -83 25
Model 4
and 4 of Tentative
S. Bedrooms Price Range
799 -3 bd= $85- 88,000 6 6
791 -3 bdrm $95- 98,000 7 7
775 -3 bd_-m $98- 101,00 6 6
794 -4 bdrm $105 - 108,000 7 7
26 L6
I -4
RESOLUTION NO. x
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12364 & 12364 -1
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12364 & 12364 -1, hereinafter "Map"
submitted by Lewis Homes, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real
property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, G±L.^.ty of San Bernardino,
State of California, described as a residential subdivision of 14.4 acres of
land into 71 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public
hearing and action on June 22, 1983; and
WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject
to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's
reports; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Comm ssion has read and considered the
Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence
presented at the public hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Co- ,=ission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga does resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in
regard to Tentat e Tract No. 12364 & 12364 -1 and the Map thereof:
(a) applicable ainterim and proposed general tand � specific
plans;
(b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is
consistent with all applicable interim and proposed
general and specific plans;
(c) The site is physically suitable for the type of
development proposed;
(d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause
substantial environmental damage and avoidable
injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat;
(e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious
public health problems;
(f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict
with any easement acquired by the public at large,
now of record, for access through or use of the
property within the proposed subdivision.
11
Resolution No.
Page 2
n
lJ
(g) That this project will not create adversa impacts on
the environment and a Negative Declaration is
issued.
SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 12364 'c 12364 -1, a copy of which
is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following
conditions and the attached Standard Conditions:
PLANNING DIVISION
All_ flag lot front yards shall be landscaped and
irrigated by the developer. Details shall be
included in the detailed landscape and irrigation
p fans.
2. Whenever the regulations of the Terra Vista
Community Plan differ from the standard conditions,
the Community Plan regulations shall supersede those
of the standard conditions.
3. Additional architectural treatment shall be provided
on the corner side elevation on lot 26 and on the
side and rear elevations of lot 7. Details shall be
included in the final construction plans.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
1. Prior to recordation, a Notice of Intention to form
and /or join landscape and lighting districts or
other maintenance entity acceptable to the City
engineer shall be filed with the City Council. The
engineer costs involved in the formation of the
district or other vehicle shall be borne by the
developer. This shall include maintenance of
perimeter landscape parkways.
2. A drainage easement shall be required and recorded
aiong with the Final Map.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 1983.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY•
Herman Rempel, Chairman
ATTEST: 40
Sec;2tary of the Planning Commission
Resolution No.
Page 3
u
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of ti
Cucamonga, do hereby certify
regularly introduced, passed,
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a
on the 22nd day of June, 2983,
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
11
11
ie Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
regul;x meeting of the Planning Commission held
by the following vote -to -wit:
u
11
D T9Y7 Uyv '�'C ' ^L pd NO^ CA G p6N ^ >JE
>•� ^mon rGa 'Pace c D� V 9YG q ETyS
^d `
L W r c9 NF •L"= TYd �� V�6' 00
N L L° C V V u^ w „p P r � P L N _„ u 0 �• h K`� L tP
NyC f ^ ^d ^n Gqd� r ^V Vd nlAp D w� T ^V wN n�
O
D ^1 N� ^O dq�. VNJC ^ YC OL DP Sp .� qW POyE
> 9 ^N9 rV,'o �O p 'Pti >P •wL ~Lr Oy
NY r3 Nu LVJ N26 NOn
L 'P G >d P�Ad yY N q Y'^l
C� 9r iS�D d• C �^ L
r° Y N O U q d E 9 J^ t.� u C 9 • 9 N � O •Ji' 9
VOC � S _ D•L ^WNM _ T ^�i 6Y .^Yd VN� Cr WV ^A9
6 ^•+ PG ^9 ^L> Nom^ ^JL Lyy dJ `Y� V Sr dp ^ =SQ6
p
M° Y d L NVN4 q^ OJ N-J d'N L01w. 9d CLYI Sq'S
O� C NLir C Y L V Y T Y ✓ w C Y C V O N F PI A d L GGL ^ r� q C
w C u � y p p L S O • j^ O p Op d P i �^ � � r Y .] N U v d d �' 9 L N
J`O NVLL =q NY Q ^dN O.d dOU rL y •^> C yJ.O LY LN
6
yE d C Y q a
9 ✓� ^ L Q G O< O n Y A O LE W V q V D> V 9 ^J C P' C� �_ C 4 O V q` i G O,
OSd ^ n PP �V9� G� .V LP[g0 uS Ja O'rVN C
�" d ' q N Y• _C• r L y A^ T 6 L 9 N O^ N C N d L D N 9 0 ^? Y S
^ C S N N ✓
t y 0 p N 6 d 9
LC d'°E0�6 C L FO ^ OA _P
Oq
$Ea1 v n L r O ^ T^ L OL ^ d L
yyj 696Ln <v6D 69�r P] 6D f6N
m
2
0
O
S
O
s
S
2
6
O
f
L
9
O
O
g
T
J
O
s
s
W_
o_
tl
O
^
6
6
r
61 O
>
of
T p 9
D q o
S L d
90M
d
v
u G
d w
V O pC
C G E
Si
d
V q �
d E C
'� pL
N C P
S c
q ° r
tea^
G"
q S
J
a C C
6
Yy O
� C •
L P q
c '^
r O L O
i„ L
e�
J' r
T q
E C
� o
Yu°
O M •Lds
9 O
Ly c o
6� W
e „ L
� � N
C PY
'PCV
N^ V
r6 P
C
Of
p V
� S
N �
u �
� V C
d \ 9
G
d y q
.n cp T
ED
c^
v
aa�
eL_
Cp p
9 >
� o
V C Q
tip=
N
d
C R
J E E
W
C= L
_ a g
M
9
L q >w
N C V
> d
qrY
c
n wd
V C T
= r
N
L � Y
V T
Y 1cCP O �
c V O
6 L n
"�!
Y
V
q..zy
V V_
i
9
F
t O
n pY'C
N V
Ny
6
qn
pTC w
V
c �•
qV
py9�
Gd.� W
V
J
c
O
Y
r
_
= o
W r
�
M
J C
V
D
T
p {y
O
<u
61 O
>
of
T p 9
D q o
S L d
90M
d
v
u G
d w
V O pC
C G E
Si
d
V q �
d E C
'� pL
N C P
S c
q ° r
tea^
G"
q S
J
a C C
6
Yy O
� C •
L P q
c '^
r O L O
i„ L
e�
J' r
T q
E C
� o
Yu°
O M •Lds
9 O
Ly c o
6� W
e „ L
� � N
C PY
'PCV
N^ V
r6 P
C
Of
p V
� S
N �
u �
� V C
d \ 9
G
d y q
.n cp T
ED
c^
v
aa�
eL_
Cp p
9 >
� o
V C Q
tip=
N
d
C R
J E E
W
C= L
_ a g
M
9
L q >w
N C V
> d
qrY
c
n wd
V C T
= r
N
L � Y
V T
Y 1cCP O �
c V O
6 L n
"�!
r
q..zy
V V_
=qo
V L
t O
n pY'C
N V
Ny
6
qn
pTC w
V
c �•
qV
py9�
Gd.� W
YP
c
O
Y
V
V
T
>
' 7
V
PxOD
V ^ S
9 S
G L 9
C O
G^
�•�
D
g^
N •
yqp
M
�
9L
q
n•Lnr�
L N
S�
6C
°rain
�-`
M L N
YPieu
C
d_
N9G
gnPS
TM
>
o
q0
a
Pu ^�
dC
LO ^N
Sq
9r
°C
6pD
N
ON
O�dn
O q
•.' y J�
9 d _
�
< O A m
O r O
6 L •L"
C N^ O V
G
m
r
9 « N N
r
✓ U
A V O
Na dam'
xa•L•d
� N
V 9
v
c•O�
N >
L � O
M Q
d PqOC N C
9 C a n
9
O C E
Z W �
_✓ a C r
9�q
O P S
V �
O
'c �o
N p
� •e ° a
c nc d
N � o
v � q
� O>N
0 0 -
T
6
O ,
V u L ✓
¢¢L r <u
�i
L
M
0
4
J
T
d
9 .
Y U
7 O
u G
N L
Low
0
9 =
o �
Lt
. u
a L
` O
uo
a
c
t `q
N c
s�
u
C
J
4
v
N
N
O
O
S
L
9
W
u
9
a
6
t
a
N
ycC
6�
d J
o c
.r. a
L
C d
Z y
�M
c
J q
R �
. o
r oa
-✓
;.°
o n u. v
o 9-+✓
-u
q°
-dn
Pam
qN
C E
os ✓ntJ9u�A.L..�
"OJi
N
✓✓
o
Yq—
p�aro
✓o
•
O
6
A! - L n�9L
C y 6 �✓
>r✓
N N
� 4
N°
✓ a G9 q a °
y
9 y'
c °—`�
uc c
tlEuA�NGr
V
q
�
y «✓�
� �r
Er Lo Pm
d�
>rd ✓ E
pLUa D�...✓3 -.L
uC
Ec
ca D «d`By ^A.J.
q�v
�
•+i�
4AG EO
e
9 N a S d✓ L 6 P
✓ q C
o,u L
c
�
(yq yNYN a Or
C
V d A y L
� d
q L°
QY•
>Y
d
q
L
yL P
^ C Cam•
ram p. V�
L
�
qq
oc" -Z
P
L ✓9N
Y p n✓Y
W�
O
OV OIL .Y Ty
�o«
�9r
✓ �: D C A
N� C q
42
9 « N N
r
✓ U
A V O
Na dam'
xa•L•d
� N
V 9
v
c•O�
N >
L � O
M Q
d PqOC N C
9 C a n
9
O C E
Z W �
_✓ a C r
9�q
O P S
V �
O
'c �o
N p
� •e ° a
c nc d
N � o
v � q
� O>N
0 0 -
T
6
O ,
V u L ✓
¢¢L r <u
�i
L
M
0
4
J
T
d
9 .
Y U
7 O
u G
N L
Low
0
9 =
o �
Lt
. u
a L
` O
uo
a
c
t `q
N c
s�
u
C
J
4
v
N
N
O
O
S
L
9
W
u
9
a
6
t
a
N
ycC
6�
d J
o c
.r. a
L
C d
Z y
�M
c
J q
R �
. o
r oa
-.!e L P
;.°
o n u. v
9
q°
O O C
C E
q
N
•
O
-• y
a
6
� 4
°
E
q
o
y «✓�
� �r
Er Lo Pm
d�
.°.
Ec
N`o
9
�
•+i�
4AG EO
e
r °a
o,u L
c
�
,
>Y
d
q
L
yL P
^ C Cam•
N_ -O
�
qq
P
L ✓9N
T �
N
�9r
A^
.-.
r
r
= ^LC
ciE9
LVCNLm
L�
q o L
A
E
G
A �
' d L_
C q P✓
O B 6D L
M
E✓
u
V N r
y✓ V
A
p
A q=£
O i d
r
r 0 0
L d L
u
U
N
c
z o ° "'
c
°�^
G✓
9 �
L
A
�
6Nq
� Q
g L tl�
O°ye
s � o tl
-°
PyL
r
°v
'^degi
N
Dr'.
nz o =
aw
Nu
MN -s
Pq i
r V
C
La�
9
r rq
id.a
-
�L
tl
n
%rD o
w
W a O G
W
�I
Ni
^I
Ni
i
�I
II
JI
O
W
tlr� N
aoaN
L
Y _
a Q
C D q
i n
a q
L
L N « q
P✓ q
a L
qya`
N
e N A
y 9
9
9 V Z a
Ar„
O
✓ O °
= c
r Ur
6 Z
G O r
c °ov
N V L
n
r t
L
c °�JOr
T 9 d
W y O -
cr-^ca
V q V
O�• J^
N
L
i
J
Y
L
a
a`y
L
Y
c
6
9
9
0
n'
_J
MP
O
cy re
4L
< v
2 S
q
H M
q
ry
E
C
9
i
v
d
N q
V d
a •+
= E
qOo
N L
tl
�D
L N
J
C V
a c
�« d
C
C «
N
nv
n V ✓
N q E
D
C 0=
i L v LuG
O F
p y
O j
V a L
cyq�
O
r
N y p i
qd �
q O O O
L a G Q
6L
O V C
q J
-TN=
TL _>
L L r c
v�u �
C q
a
6E�a
C yC N t L
q
V O g L O 6
diu�c
i y °a
V
ndi3 v
Pr TC T
C �y O
O E p
S C�u q
It Z
C9 •
E9 r q V
q V q N P
d c N
p •N ✓'J
C D
O C O Q C W
r `L Edo
_ v
V n q
O1 • 9 `
o N d ° . «
g V
N � �• N d O
�• J�9 COQ
vagcN_o yo
Lam•' gC4gY
T Q N 9 L E
M a O
°`u V gw.Or n
O `r `v«
tl
4°` tl�
N r g L L N
9 V a r j V
u.-
d C S
C CC ` ✓ tl q
s O A
r j
Lyn�DT N
c� Vg.`9D nr
a�99eE
O > _✓ O L N
N O d✓ V a C O
dv Ptl`
« a a tl N N
.cedr cD�<
�i
C
N
N
o
V
d
O
n
4
ivN
N L
O Q v y
y C y O
O �
C
a � c
_tl=
> A
Cp V^0.
✓ter
y L
r � G
T
n ca
°N N
d °
� O N
L O C
6Y °�
O C +
Nx c
u 9 q
u
T L p
t O -
c -,°` A e
P q C V ^
O
p 0.N
� A
N� ^I
W
bW -
r c
tl N A°
Y -
ar
N L
a-
a
6
LF
No
C °
O
o c
d F
V d
tl
>
a
.L• L
Ly
v �
d L
O
L c
6= N
a�E
N O 6
occ
C C �
6pm
NI
4
d
O
L
v
�o
P n
- w
N ?
O
✓ L
c i
4i
� O
i Fc
V a
p u
NI
s
a
w
n
Y P
0
6
L
g
q
a
a
u
M
w x
� m w
b � �
C O O
p O »
L O O
u
6 p q q
C
.°r N
tl ^I I
¢
u
A
H
a
L_
d
A
0
A
9
O
V9
atl
a°e
q y
V o
C
q O
T �
q Y
v `
c
° O-
Na
T�
V ^
C ^
Nl P-
al �a
W
C( W
C_-
q d
A9
?' o
u�
q
c
ac
`o
V
V Y
q N
d U
C
ELN
9 Cy
9 F
t � y
O ✓=
P
oqa
aY u
N
Aso
Y `
N`r
y 4
yO =
N
T O y
P
L ^ L
E.
II
P
C Y A C
� O
` y 6
c r
" o A
r -
a ` A
r A
QE ^�
V L o E
a N
O
C d L 6
w' L
m ��y
n�
d
° Nr
a
a a
^Lbi
N ^y
N N f O
C
T O
Y V q
N L
s
v
c
m
0
a
N
�N
K
O O
o-a
N -
� 5
a O
J
c A
O
V
O
^ C
A A
L b
u Y
Y
n
q
C.
VL
H
N T
a
aqc
y o c
�T
�c Ypc�
Pr
y¢ n
r
d r a
� a
= 9
rnar
C > y
7
O Q O
L q 4
V b
d O
:5 L
c 2
c q L
ya`
r Y
i d
Nc^
_
- C P
6
T Y -
a } V
Oqy d
q r6 p•L.+
O
O
r
d
a
S
r
V
C
e
w
r0
b
�r
E
s
q
L
O M
p O
tl
LY
C
j o
P V
a tl
L o
y W
C �
C
b �
c
Y o
U 6A
c ,
G P L
V V PN O
..E.; u o
Ni II
a0A0' CO Q °C Ppp �N•n� NL AL EVT • LQ O a0a
dt� t „ CACpEdj d 'C TO - 6 °�N dL �L ✓ GF
O .O A9 ,tl L .r �L✓ y g rtl N V Ntl r O-
N0.nd `a ✓ ✓O ✓,Ln rgi1 V9O +•q qA .^ - � °Oc
V G C Q d P A V w wai a - _J r✓ V N N n V q V Ot wai C Y ^ V
q�• b� j � L� V N�> fi L L .J T q C a - l- ^ C q a
Y N C a C ' r P` ^^ O` O> • a` L N u C a Y a
U rc ���1111
O� V✓ Z °d � Y L O L P V L• A � Z C C q- � 0.� tl y a a
r P yJ y Y 9 ✓ q V l d Y a C 9- '- d A d Y .� r q N 9 a P L V b
Nc�Nil ° e �wL.mco LT ✓r. .c oe "i.00 mid �'� � oi. v«
�°. vq .� .� mac A N�Q �aam� qe n� nw �' t.L•- �PY a
FOV� OY� O .Nr a q NC96 �A qV L - O-J Lam` A E•L.• ^N
°, 9O y S q V tl 0° C tl - .� C A C 9 � G y A✓` � N y V y
Lya N`O, L dq OC CYj -y fiM q y _ ^ T O
` O
YecOga a SL i.`b r ^- i -t V - ,TndLuca
O tl o 0� L Y •O• � C a! r g A L u o N E � «' c� Gv .L. y� C � ,L` ,^e n .Yi• � t 0
N Vtl T L O-
EOT P'; a ay L
n0 'ACA - L '^b L =a -1 •�q C yfE
L
rU� a � •[N NN- qlN N M9 y�A `�tl O ..� M ` SPt
E �R^ �� ✓� °O CY�LQ q`. �� rnE
WE i
` o ac `nN �� OGyu
q,U`V NaN d YW -q>'Y' L� wL 9a- dq0 19 W.!!
CPC Wq gTLO
qy. 9>• 9Ny O V- dYq fi Qq_
ad O aA pNN n ' r N T -N ✓ AN- yp p1 tl
` n y a` n M O C a a b Tr O C ✓^ ^ N V -� C O G d 9� C a
✓ J n b N O Fa O P O �On S O T O C C e✓ L N- r L✓ A q` L Vp N y
^ € qL -r-
C N L O N N O N N N .r N d> 6 C ^ ••. ,r' " S N L '^ 0. p O P C O
NVWeW E,bn p1 E - •.•���V rL9Vn tl
u C N C V ^ q N ••� i q q ' u � 4 u ^ L2
N A N 6 N^ G a 4 N Z N V d S q O 6
` ^ 4_
JI q'I NI �I )I • PI �I )I 11 I �I
` T q P d d C l p Y p T L O q �� y O� 9 U= �T� � ✓
D O C L U •y 4 C y q a V Y� C L
•,V(f�' d 1'n V J C^ d P d9 P��d .O..V O. LrO of pn
✓ -dJ Y ^nu.w rN ^PCU d^
V P C ^ PVO) bd TF� O O p y
L pL DCO N pCd_ PD _P CEO 'O DVS VVL UU Lr
u C �•.` �rr r r � O =C J rLy L
`� C SO Opp x'06 Q99 �.O..dJA9 DlE >CdOT rd
L p J` nN0 V..- �r DCq nU C�.yi9Lp ��•
_ L 6 q C L E` p_ •rig S L L
V O D 9
—72 w d d` O G 6 O V r Y � q n p —T 9 N P S O N
12:5
E S
ar dN n r ` S•J O `tr N�oa= 6FD .•>.D OO 9 9r
dV nd U pV�6 L'!n�V� VNE ,OLndW �IFtI
DV SN lEVV L >N ralWgL �9
py r9 .gyp O r0� N y ��L'\06 °� tOP5G9 vT
%z �Jp Y' _ • C` y Y W V r
C y V p d p G n f O P V✓ GN � N r P D V r� d I D d
c �:52
`� `r c.`o�Gw c °c w> .d•o� awo�L o n oN °yL ^I!` «o
�` ..c 4v�P F Nyv° ipc aro vrr um wN mcc ^m: m9w p
V'i E t rI 0 9
D I Y N
N ^O rnr w� O a C w. n d C> C O w T 4 � � •^ r N .+ fO y Z } S T
d a O L
L V 9 Y T O O
G
n •
e �
0
p Prp wr Ldp L VL dP pd w P dPd
y p 9 O q
4L Tr =0 _ MJrS YNW rN w� C� Ll�
y V` L 0) C O p G •• O d V E CNrEy y CQ!E� L V r w V E DC V C
rVh .W Gt`� 6b >w O VrV
r C s p d C G 9 r
L`w..� CV O� aYlt d,Cy r LV rr QO N e90
y OY. O Y �b'rSV Sp _NO �. fC lJ O
C �^ NL 6L d > JD 'Jp >C O Vpr
O Z r N t L Y V V C C F w p y V d d S V V 9 J
•
C O�O rNLL N LO dG _N
Ze
C np nO.VO C� G6 LYdN wL 2L DU 9 dp
W`•i YLgt y qr�d � ON rC r� .• r9
p�9�abi t� =N `wLV9
Z S q N C 7z=
E O S 6 V 6 D q 9 6
^C 6' r✓M�'^ rNUC h sr� �V � ."C.LnP
v G n •L.. t O R r 4 V C d r i D o . n y T g C v
9 p
LVCV LC LC nC•+6) _ C.✓ L � CV C �` Lf.7 nl
�OL� PtNTb Jp{gG1VV > >S E� r NO- C w°�
�PCO fV0 CCm�d �-46t9 � V . lld �7 rC 6��9
V ^ a =riV�r J Or•� fY � V L ` V q.J•
Cr O'�9y D�r � y.y� LL y7 VV
O. 4' •L/ 6 O � O q` O p V d O d G 9 D_r N � N r �` M V C V
L c N W c L y E O Q d r o d N c N P= V^ N C y G V d
F O� C` ✓ E v e 4 �_ C. J d a C` N .'E o �� u 6 O � ✓ ^� 0
NrVpV 9�V �C 4y arr \L.r+ � JV 'J� uV Op OmN1
G L L l V •r G O C N N p N O y V r O J L d b
w u
p l` d y q l 9 N 9 9 Q l r C N p L� ✓ C i 51 L r � =✓ •L..
°mL y� dV�J �� `• OJ�N� V V 9 ee NnV WC 7
En VoWa f. ✓dV enWS L O `�� 'SCE —no ve c
.d. v� A� � 1 'o —a Lc Jd L cqd r J •tid c � u a`noc Y
mil
N Nl N
11
V' F =aaT i ai�J ° rogT`p
i
{ W� W C• _ r q F L C '
S G ' L r � b W 0� A P O C� ` V G •I N
222
NyE c' N
6'
�nm vd�e� yuL L Ci N9V GE
-�
OqL rYIbO <PO r°• VW OL6�r
-
ip`
` d d P C
.•.n I j ado
v A
L�J Ecyy? cN`ea sue.°. .° ,.✓u Lo :�;L o
_c I � •,, �WQ a _ °r Ai�ow =� r� _gars
if Nr
T
1 V4 ` I C OOC C -Cyd u6L LV �>_ V
V L
Y.3 YCV YU dC° yV dY EW O,O `Y O.V�
o_e° c aabo � of o a ct va.
d pp
37"
r• q J V d
LU
t
«6 � ^ Cqd °TL1rp ^� P d r6 Uq ^•°nOC
U i -'^ LCIJ NLN� J�Lr - qC KL LLU
y N V N O O N O r O 4 V 6^ W r N
9
0
c
0
A
N
x
v
A
6
c
v_
s
V
O
6
a
0
w. q
- L
A q
L
N �
P T.L..
T Y9
3 6
Y
9
N 9
v e
C N
^
e_
„ V
O '.1
sr
i
O
v^
W q
l w
Y -
uv
O _
J i
° x
T
9 N
x
�r
c
x «
v
lu
c T
J
�
N
°
I•
p
C � N
rt
`•
--
a
!
v
L
-°
L
P
i
C
9
�
jNJ
jl�
7
9
C V
9 �r
V
q
a T
d
O L
p
a
•C.•
s�
r rC
rq
vq_
V
y�
d
= O
O a
N
I
E
NiN
�i
Li
`jN�
P
Cy
�! '^
C v 9 ^
E a• c E
C -
OI
l I V O g f
L L
V^
EO1
i
N
n
�i�;
i
1!
w,r
C 1
�dT
NC
�O
^.ti
•di•i
Elf.
°mod
CJ
9
rr
t�
^O
y
^Yp
qlq
Vn
Nay
NQ
Cya
qC
^£
-2:.5
G
f
N
d
y
y
'
bC
•'fC�
�
a
VNN�
_..O
C9
l
•'
�
'
..r
Q
C
.0 ` d
i C `
9V
� Oy J
�.. x
N
C
G�V
9 ^_
NO
w(�
6
�
✓2
CqS^
NFV
✓�
�I
P
-L+�
O� P L
9^ l
� q
K q L
L N
I
�
4 V•.r
6
G VL
x
O�
I
VO
<c
6'r O.V
10
m
P
c
0
A
N
x
v
A
6
c
v_
s
V
O
6
a
0
w. q
- L
A q
L
N �
P T.L..
T Y9
3 6
Y
9
N 9
v e
C N
^
e_
„ V
O '.1
sr
i
O
v^
W q
l w
Y -
uv
O _
J i
° x
9 N
x
�r
c
x «
v
lu
c T
J
�
N
C � N
rt
`•
--
a
jNJ
c`
E
V
a T
d
O L
p
a
r rC
Nu PL
vq_
V
= O
O a
r 'T
E
r
�i
Li
`jN�
P
Cy
�! '^
C v 9 ^
E a• c E
C -
OI
l I V O g f
L L
V^
EO1
i
N
n
�i�;
i
1!
N �
i
. 6
m
n
1 ^
n
°o -
Z�
. ib
n
6 m
J N
1
O
O
9 m
O_ b
O "1
J
^
r
C
b
Z
Y
i
O
= a
1 -
� O
O
u n
J 6
2 J
L
i
1 J
°e
r m
N
O
v
w
M1
b
0
0
J
em
n� °n mj
oPG
no
nw
N
_3
o
? n
J
L
n
p
o
v
o
n
m
r0
O
N
ro J
O
r
O,
n
n;
••O
O
N^ I
�LN
S
n O
n
l J
b a
N
r
°n
L
v
0
-
nN ��
O
°�
r
O
�
_
1
O
r b
N
o
J
Fm
OI
c 6
-
O
C
`
'f
u
^n
s
°
6'z
<
c
r
n
IJO
v
N �
i
. 6
m
n
1 ^
n
°o -
Z�
. ib
n
6 m
J N
1
O
O
9 m
O_ b
O "1
J
^
r
C
b
Z
Y
i
O
= a
1 -
� O
O
u n
J 6
2 J
L
i
1 J
°e
r m
N
O
v
w
M1
b
0
0
• N
vcJ uor <°
J -S m
t r q H
� ae
I
I s JO m
� 2] O n
N ~ n a a
n n
zz
9
O p O
N Y J N l
rn
w _
O O._
O m O
�O
O m
O 3 �
^ � a
L y
Imo N
0
• Ia
T IG
e
G
Oi
iA
r
z
� a
a
w O
d b
^
3
S
n
J
O
r
k
s
M
L
!N
0
0
J
°
7
v
G
G
6
S
m
b
O
1
IO
I�
b
a3 i°
b N _
r 10
n = O
L
n
n a �
O_
� Z
m q.
w
u'{ M
N
O
O
•[ S
T n
J O
d N
J ^
R
m C
1 �
T
e
n
I
P
N a
2
4f0 O
n <
�. N Y
n N
O L
P q
J
m
a
c I°o
J p
J O T
- J
N m
S L N
m
n
^ G
� a'n
�•J L
O
PUS
n <Q
t r0
m
O P =
A T
° S r
T m �
d w
p rq
�6N
•va
J
z°
O. 1
n
k
N
N r0
w �
n O
„O m
z l
L
b
J �
v=
_ O
9
NO
O O
C M
n O'
�m
[7 O
6 1
TJ
O O
7 ?
b b
an
0.
M
7 7
.� Ie
e
o=
n.�
J
�b
11
L a
O
w
I
em
n� °n mj
oPG
no
o
? n
J
n
p
N
ro J
O n�^
O,
n;
••O
O
N^ I
�LN
Rs n
nN ��
°�
°p-•
�J�r
`
'f
y�lOa
^n
dG3
3
h 0
Q°
m
J d
�•
��
� � �
' j
�Ip N
G �
^
°-
Y
L
n�
O N A J
S
`
n
2 l
I!;
N J°
3+
O
Ntdd
�O
• 6
m m
• N
-
N L.
• •r N
m
M
b
O'• n
^
i
-
'm
o-
0
• N
vcJ uor <°
J -S m
t r q H
� ae
I
I s JO m
� 2] O n
N ~ n a a
n n
zz
9
O p O
N Y J N l
rn
w _
O O._
O m O
�O
O m
O 3 �
^ � a
L y
Imo N
0
• Ia
T IG
e
G
Oi
iA
r
z
� a
a
w O
d b
^
3
S
n
J
O
r
k
s
M
L
!N
0
0
J
°
7
v
G
G
6
S
m
b
O
1
IO
I�
b
a3 i°
b N _
r 10
n = O
L
n
n a �
O_
� Z
m q.
w
u'{ M
N
O
O
•[ S
T n
J O
d N
J ^
R
m C
1 �
T
e
n
I
P
N a
2
4f0 O
n <
�. N Y
n N
O L
P q
J
m
a
c I°o
J p
J O T
- J
N m
S L N
m
n
^ G
� a'n
�•J L
O
PUS
n <Q
t r0
m
O P =
A T
° S r
T m �
d w
p rq
�6N
•va
J
z°
O. 1
n
k
N
N r0
w �
n O
„O m
z l
L
b
J �
v=
_ O
9
NO
O O
C M
n O'
�m
[7 O
6 1
TJ
O O
7 ?
b b
an
0.
M
7 7
.� Ie
e
o=
n.�
J
�b
11
L a
O
w
I
0
El
7
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 22, 1983
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Lloyd B. Hibbs, City Engineer
By- Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FUND PARCEL MAP 79441 - WESILAYU vcn'unL -
A division of .0 acres of and into parce s within the C- zone
located on the north side of Base Line, west of East Avenue -
APN 227 -131- 45,47148
I, PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Re uested: To divide 5.06 acres of land into 3 parcels .
rty physically divided
B. purpose: To create legal parcels from prope
by the construction of the freeway ramp.
C. Location: West side of East Avenue, north of Base Line.
D. Parcel Size:
Parc"-2.89 acres
Parcel 2 - 1.8: acres
Parcel 3 - 30 acre
acres
E, Existing Zonis: Etiwanda Specific Plan - pending
Parcel 1 - office professional
Parcel 2 - freeway commercial
Parcel 3 - medium density residential 4 -14 duiac.
F. Existing Land Use: vacant.
G. Surroundin Land Use Zorin medium density 8 -14 du /ac
Nor± - x;stin sin a am; y -
South - 1 -15 Freeway - State right -of -way
East - State right -of -way
West - Existing nursery - medium density - 8 -14 du /ac
H, General Plan Desi nations:
or i - Me ium density - 8 -14 du /ac
South - I -15 Freeway
East - Freeway right -of -way
West - Medium density - 8 -14 du /ac
ITEM D
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Environmental Assessment and Parcel Map 7944 - Westland Venture
June 22, 1983
Page 2
;. Site Characteristics: The property is vacant with existing windrow
to the north and some scattered trees on Parcel I and 3. It slopes
southwesterly at aprroximateiy 3 %.
II. ANALYSIS•
Westland Venture Company has submitted this Parcel Map in order to craate
legal parcels from property already physically divided bj the freeway
ramp and Base Line Road.
There are no im+i:ediate pians for development of any parcel. Ex1sting
street improvements are situated such that it is appropriate to delay the
remaining improvements to the time of development of each parcel.
Development of the parcels will be subject to Ctmmiss ion review prior to
any approvals. '
III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW_
Also attached for your review and consideration is Part I of the Initial
Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part I; of the
Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field
investigation. Upon completion and review of the Initial Study and field
investigation, Staff found no adverse impacts on the environment as a
result of the proposed subdivision.
IV. CORRESPONDENCE:
Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners
and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also
been completed.
V. RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Planning
elements of the project. If, after
can support_ the recommended conditions
Engineer's Report, then adoption of
^r�Y late. It is also recommende d
issued.
Respectfully submittecf�
LBH:B iaa
Attachments: Map
Resolution
City Engineer's Report
Initial Study
Commission consider all input and
such consideration, the Commission
of approval as written in '.,!-.e City
the attached resolution would be
that a Negative Declaration be
11
E
i
R -
PARCEL, MAP N®. 07 9 4 4
IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA
mm A fYaCsv . OS 1CS aa. YLa t OI 10O.t11:WtS w or M
►tea �2 yypt. Sf M WW=2 CI W ASP. RatL O►
U12/OtaSA. Y 1R )4AT IICR>b19 SS WGt })V SORSIOar2Ca'rS'SC
SiCA1DS O) uS0 C90►Sf. d' -vS )T� �� O� al. If>i.
A 1R RUTS Ol
131,
• i) aom aoa0. ))CiT laf. plliC2Ai 16MS.
y 3.06 NE'1 ACRES L
APRI 1993
AD06.E AND A$SDC7ATES. lNC. (PARCEL 1. 2 AMD PARCEL l)
NOEL'
c Cwsfc Mro.a. dr. yr« SY►m✓ 56ro
Q.....y.1V. A1.. A•A0..04
e. rwosw�'b' +^s
SayL R-1
0
xm C R -1
CuRf1E c..0
AY•YYZ M..M'
O •u•N Yli 1Pn
Q S•T'1e6• ►210 GYias
fi
1
m a1R. —
Aa r w -s -
0
Fj l
a
1
OPP
b
�ap ��vc^ sw.s►T ��
ISM
1
s�
Y
Irl
0
E
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
INITIAL STUDY
c
PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant
Environmental Assessment Review Fee: 587.00
For all projects requiring environmental review, this
form must be completed and submitted to the Development
R;view Committee through the department. where the
project application is made. Upon recept of this
application, the Environmental Analysis staff wi'.1 prepare
Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review
Committee will meet and take action no later than ten
(10) days before the public meeting at which time the
project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of
three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi-
ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration
twill be filed, 2) The Project will have a significant
environmental impact_ and an Environmental Impact Report
will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report
should be supplied by tine applicant giving further informa-
tion concerning the proposed project.
PROJECT TITLE: Tt'ffi "ur PARCEL MAP NO. 7344
APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE:
r- nmvLKV. 3152 NORTH MOUNTAIN AVENUE.
NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED
CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: MR. SAM ANGONA 1152 NORTH MOUNTAIN
AVENUE, SUITE 104, UPLAND. CA 9173E (7 141 981-Q228
LOCATION OF PROJECT - (STREET cADDRESS
aRrELDNO.ASSESSOR
227 -131 4227- 131 -48
LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND
FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS:
CAL -TRANS C.C.W.D_ _
0 I -1
PROJECT DESCRIPTI.01:
nrgrRTPTTON OF PROJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 7944-
ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND
PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY:
DESCRIBE THE ENVIRON14ENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE
INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES),
ANI.MALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE
OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY
EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS)-
IS the project part of a larger project, one of a series
of cumulative actions, which although individually small,
=.ay as a whole have significant environmental impact?
A/0'
1-2
LJ
lu
WILL THIS PROJECT:
YES NO
XX 1, Create a substantial change in grourd
contours?
XX 2, Create a substantial change in existing
noise or vibration?
XX 3. Create a substantial change in demand for
municipal services (police, fire, water,
sewage, etc.)?
XX 4. Create changes in the existing -oning or
general plan designations?
_ XX 5. Remove any existing trees? How many ?__
XX 5. Create the need for use or disposal of
potentially hazardous materials such as
toxic substances, flammables or explosives?
Explanation of any YES answers above:
TMpORTA1vT: If the project involves the construction of
residential units, complete the form on the
next page.
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements
furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the
data and information required for this initial Statements, and
to the best of my ability., and that the facts,
information presented are true and correct to the best of
my
knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional
information may be requxredeo be s.ubmitd
Re eforeoan adequate
evaluation can be made y h
Date l� - Signature
Title
1-3
RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION
The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonc_
Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school
district to accommodate the proposed residential development.
PARCEL MAP WESTLAND VENTURE COM AiNy
Name of Developer and Tentative i?5P99AX= : TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 7944
Specific Location of Project: NORTHWEST CORNER OF BASELINE ROAD AND
EAST AVENUE
PHASE I PHASE 2 PRASE 3 PHASE 4
1. Number of single
family units: N/A
2. Number of multiple
family units: N/A -
3. Date proposed to
begin construction: N/A
4. Earliest date of
occupancy: NIA
Model #
and # of Tentative
5. Bedrooms Price Range
I -4
TOTAL
RESOLUTION N0.
40 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER
SIDE (TENTATIVE NORTH AND SOUTH,OFOBASED EST
LINE ROAD
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 7944, submitted by Westland
Venture Company and consisting of 3 parcels, located on the west side of East
Avenue, north an(; south of ease Line Road being ads,i i ntof County of ckan
of preliminary map of the Etiwanda Celeny )n
Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in book 2 of maps, page
24, records of said county. Except therefrom that portion conveyed to the
State of California records; anddeed recorded December 13, 1972, in book 8080, page
139, official e
WHEREAS, on May 189 1983, a formal application
requesting review of the above - described Tentative Map; and
Commission held a duly
was submitted
WHEREAS, on June 229 1983, the Planning
advertised public hearing for the above - described map.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. That the following findings have been made:
1. That the map is consistent with the Ger._rai Plan.
2. That the with the General at thePian osed subdivision is
3. That the site is physically suitable for the
proposed development.
4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will
not cause substantial environmental damage, Public
health problems or have adverse affects on abutting
property.
SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse
environmental impacts and a Negative Declaration is issued on June 22, 1983.
SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 7944 is approved subject to
the recommended Conditions of Approval pertaining thereto-
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 1983.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
E
Page 2
BY-
Herman Re.-.,,)el, Chairman
ATTEST:
of -the Planning Commission
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 22nd day of June, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ASSENT: COKMISSI04ERS:
11
11
L'
C
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA14ORGA
RECOMMKOED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
LOCATION: west side of East Avennuex_north of TENTATIVE MAP NO. 7944
Base Line P.oad DATE FILED: 5/18183
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A subdivision of Lot 16, NUMBER OF LOTS:_ 3
Block K Etiwanda Colony Lands, as retarded in GROSS ACREAGE: 5.06 net
Book 2 of Maps Pa a 24 Count of San ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.227- 131 -45 47,48
Bernardino, State of Ca ifornia
DEVELOPER OWNER ENGINEER /SURVEYOR
Westland Venture Co. same Madole & Assoc., inc.
1152 N. Mountain Ave. 545 N. Mountain Ave.
Suite luD
Suite Ontario CA 91786
Ontario CA 91786
Improvement and dedication requirements in accordance with Title 16 of the
Municipal Code of the City of Ranch Cucamonga include, but may not be limited
to, the following:
Dedications and Vehicular Access
Dedications shall be made of all interior street rights- of -w'�Y and
all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map.
Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the
following streets:
1.
2.
3.
additional feet on
additional feet on
additional feet on
Corner property line radius will be required per City Standards.
X 4. All rights of vehicular ingress and egress shall be dedicated as
follows: on Base Line except for one opening for a drive approach
for each parcel.
5. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring
access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all common roads,
drives or parking areas shall be provided by C.C. &R.s and shall be
recorded concurrent with the map.
6. All existing easements lying within future right -of -way are to be
quitclaimed or delineated or the map per City Engineer's
requirements.
7. Easements for sidewalk for public use shall be dedicated to the
City where sidewalks meander through private property.
Surety
X 1. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to tha
satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney, guaranteeing
completion of the public improvements 'prior to building permit
issuance for each parcel.
X 2. A lien agreement must be executed prior to recording of the map
for the following:landscaped median island on Base Line Road.
3. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed, guaranteeing
completion of all on -site drainage facilites necessary for
dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the 3i ;ilding and
Safety Divison prior to recording for
and /or prior to issuance of building permit for
Street Im rovements
ursuant to t e City of Ranch Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title 16, Section
16.36.120, the subidiver may enter into an agreement and post security with the
City guaranteeing the required construction prior to recordation of the map 4D
and /or building permit issuance.
1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to,
-- curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches,
parkway trees and street lights on a:l interior streets.
2. A minimum of 26 -foot wide pavement within a 40 -foot wide dedicated
right -of -way shall be constructed for all half- section streets.
X 3. Construct the following missing improvements:
Prior to building permit issuance for each parcel.
Lien agreement for median island prior to retardation of map.
Cur
A.C.
i e- Drive
Street
treet A.C.
Meoian
Street Name Gutter
Pvmt.
Walk Appr.
Trees_IL,
hts Overia
Islander ther
[Rase Line X
X_
X
X X
lien
Includes landscaping and irrigation or meter
X 4. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, fees
shall oe paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from
the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other rermits
11
X 5.
X _ 6.
X 7,
Street improvement plans shall be prepared by a Registered Civil
Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of an
encroachment permit.
Developer shall coordinate, and wh:•re necessary, pay for the
relocation of an, power poles or other existing public utilities
as necessary.
Existing lines of 12KV or less fronting the property shall be
undergrounded.
X 8. Install appropriate street name signs, traffic control signs,
striping and markings with locations and types approved by the
City Engineer.
X 9. Street light locations, as required, are to the be approved by the
Southern California Ediso.j Company and
Cucamonga. Lights shell be on decorative poles with underground
service.
X 10. Lcndscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to and approved
by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of buildino permit.
11. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Linder
sidEwalk drains shall be installed to City Standards.
Drainages and Flood Control
1. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainaye shall be
required and shall be delineated or noticed on the final map.
2. surface draionaae- entering the property fram a disposal of
djacent areas ?
3. The following storm drain shall be installed to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer
4. Prior to recordation of the map, a hydrologic and drainage study
for the project shall be submitted to the City Engineering for
review.
5. A drainage detention tasin per City Standards shall be constructed
to detain increased runoff
G' auin
X 1.
Grading of the bubject property shall be in accordance with the
_
Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading
pr7ctices. Tie final gradilig plan shall be in subs,antial
c;)nformance with the approved conceptual grading plan.
X 2.
A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed
by the State of California to perform such work.
3.
A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or
geologist and submitted at the time of application or grading plan
check.
4.
The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by
the Grading Committee and shall be completed prior to recordation
of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit
whichever comes first.
X S.
Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the
Building and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of
building permit.
General Requirements and Approvals
X 1.
Permits from other agencies will be required as i:)llows:
ralTrans for
pan Bernardino County Flood Control District
Cucamonga County Water District for sewer and water
San Bernardino County Dust Abatement (required prior to
issuance of a grading permit)
Other
2_
A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (C.C. &R.$)
--
approved by the City Attorney is required prior to recordation of
the map.
X 3.
Provide all utility services to each lot including sewerage,
water, electric power, gas and telephcne prior to street
constructon.
X 4.
Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to cucamenga
County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is
required.
X 5.
This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from
CalTrans.
X 6.
Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other
interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be
subject to any requirements that may be received from them.
X 7. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not
guarantee that sewer treatment capacit, will be available at the
time building permits are requested. When building permits are
requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will be asked to
certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued
unless said certification is received in writing.
8. Local and Master Planned Trails shall be provided in accordance
with the Trail Plan. A detailed trail plan indicating widths,
maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing and weed control, it
accordance with City trail standards, shall be submitted to and
approved by the City Planner prior to recordation for
and /or prior to building permit issuance
for
g. Prior to recording, a deposit shall be posted with the City
covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under
Assessment District 82 -1 among the newly created parcels.
X 10. At the time of final map submittal, the following shall be
submitted_ Title Report, traverse calculations (sheets), copies
of recorded m is and deeds used as reference and /or showing
original land division, tie notes an? bench marks referenced.
G.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LLCYD B. HUBBS, CITY ENGINEER
by:
F]
r
0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: .1une 22, 1983
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: REVISION OF CONDITIONS FOR PARCEL MAP 7349 - L1
COMPANY - Located on the north side of 4th Street,
T17`kreewav - APN 229- 283 -49
S DEVELOPMENT
istsideofI-
Parcel Map 7349 was approved by Planning Commission on May 26, 1982 for the
division of 20.45 acres of land into 8 parcels within the General Industrial
Area, Subarea 14. Condition No. 48 of the City Engineer's Report as approved
by Resolution No. 82 -53 states that "C.C. &Rs for the Map declaring the
property o�.iers' responsibility for maintenance of the detention basin shall
be required and recorded concurrent with the recot,dation of the Map ".
Lewis Homes, developer of Parcel Map 7349, has requested this condition be
changed to state "A landscape maintenance district shall be formed for the
future maintenance of the retention basin, storm drain and landscaping prior
to the recordation of thr. Parcel Map ".
The detention basin and storm drain pipe as shown on the attached plan will be
used to detain the run -off from Hyssop Street. This is a temporary basin and
will be removed when the Master Plan Storm Drain is constructed. The
landscaping which will be installed on the west side of Hyssop Street (between.
the Freeway and Hyssop), will also be included in the District.
tlhie develo per is
mentioned above. Afterhthat time, all parcels will maintenance
be assessed
equally.
City Council will holi a Public Hearing on July 6, 1983 for approval to form
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3.
RECOMMENDATION:
If after consiaeration the Commission agrees with the change of Condition No.
48, then the attached resolution should be signed and forwarded to City
Counci 1.
r jaa
._nts:
I
Map
Letter
Resolution
Resolution No.
Vicinity Map
82 -53 & City Engineer's Report
ITEM E
a
"S HOMES
1156 Moms Mo Kahan !venue i P.O. Sax 670 i �3. CA 95786 i 79a 985-0479
June 9, 1983
Ms. Barbara Krall
Engineering Technician
City of Rancho Cucamonga
93 20 Base Line Road, Suite C
P.O. Box. 807
Renche Cucamonga, CA 91730
Re: PM 7349, A City maintenance District for Storm Drain
Detention Basin and Parkway Adjacent to Freeway
Lear Barbara:
We hereby request the City form a maintenance District to maintain the
westerly parkway of Hyssop Drive where it is adjacent to the freeway,
and also to maintain the storm drain and storm water detention basin..
very truly yours,
o
Ron Nottingham.
Engineering Coordinator
RN:br
E
LA
r�
c
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -53
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PARCEL MAP NUMBER 7349 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.
7349) LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 4TH STREET,
BETWEEN THE DEVORE FREEWAY AND DAY CREEK.
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 7349, submitted by Lewis
Development Company and consisting of 8 parcels, lccated on the north
side of 4th Street, between the Devore Freeway and Day Creek, being a
division of c portion of the West 1/2 of lots 81 -88, Map of Rochester,
recorded in Book 9 of Maps, Page 20, San. Bernardino County; and
WHEREAS, on April 16, 1982, a formal application was submitted
requesting review of the above - described ter,ative map; and
WHEREAS, on May 26, 1982, the Planning Commission held a duly
advertised public hearing for the above - described map.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE - IANC;'C CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made:
1. That the map is consistent with the proposed General
Plan.
2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is
consistent with the proposed General Plan.
3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed
development.
4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will
not cause s0stantial environmental damage, public
health problems or have adverse affects on abutting
property.
SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant
adverse environmental impacts and a Negative Declaration is issued on
May 26, 1982-
SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 72+9 is approved
subject to the conditicns of the City Engineer's Report pertaining
thereto, and subject to approval by the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment
Agency.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OFi9AY, 1 °82.
E
Resolution No. 82 -53
Page 2
PLANNING COMMISSION OF
lA
C
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ssion
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamcnga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution, was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 26th day of May, 1982, by the following vote -to-
wit:
AYES: COMMMISSIONERS: King, Toistoy, Rempel, Stoat
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Sceranka
E
11
6
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT
FILED B1:
Lewis Development
Co.
TENTATIVE MAP
N0. 7349
LOCATION:
North side of
4th Streetz bztr.'een the
DATE FILED:
4/16/82
Devore Fwv. & Day Creek NUMBER OF !-CTS, 8
LEGAL
DESCRIPTION: A portion of the
N
= of
lots 81
RECEIPT
NUMBER:
to
8 Map of Rochester recorded
in
Book
9 of
FEE:
$273.00
_ ZONE: General Industrial
ag 20 _
TENTATIVE YvaP PREPARED BY: Stanley C. Morse GROSS ACREAGE: 20.45
ADDRESS: 1125 East Stanford Ct.
Anaheim California —
MINI UM LOT AREA:
MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE:
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 1: x * * * * * * * * * * * * i* * * * * * * * * * *
RECORD OMER(S)
ADDRESS PHONE
® Sol,thprn California Edison Co. P.O. Box 410
Long Beach Blvd.
Long Beach California Yuoul
REPORT OF THE CITY ENGINEER
Dedications
X 1. Dedication by final map of all interior street rights -ef -way and all necessary
easesents as shown on the tentative map.
2. Dedication by final map of the following missing rights -o€ -way on the following
streets:
additional feet on
additional feet on
additional feet on
_ Corner P /i_ radius required on
Other
X 3. Rights of vehicular access shall be limited as follows:Access control on
4th Gtraot
4. Street vacation required for:
5. Master Plan of Streets revision required for:
6. The following perimeter intersections require realignment as follows: —
RCE 20
6
TENTATIVE MAP N0. 7349 Page _
Improvements (Bonding is required prior to �] Recording 7c
L3 Building permit for _)
_X 7. Construct full street improvements (including curb and gutter, A.C. pavement,
sidewalk, on. drive approach per lot, parkway trees and street lights) on all
interior streets.
8. Construct the following missing improvements on the following streets:
*includinq landscanina and irrigdt'.on on meter
STREET NArtE
CURB &
GJTTER
A.C.
PVMT.
SIDE- DRIVE
WALK APPR.
STREET
TREES
X
STREET
LIGHTS
MEDIAN
ISLAND*
� 14'Peeme
OTHER
t
4th St.
X Pul A
1
X 9. Construct all storm drain aid drainage structures as showy, on the tentative
naD, or as required by the City Engineer.
X 10. Provide all utility services to each lot including sanitary sewers, water,
e,actric power, gas, telephone and cable television_ccnduit. All utilities
are to be underground.
X il. )eveloper shali coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of
a.iy power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary.
X 12. In :tali approprizte street name signs and traffic control signs with loca-
Vic%s and types a, -)roved by the City Engineer.
X_ 13. Develcoer is to pr,, -ide all construction nlans for drainage and street im-
provements. Such plans shall meet approval of the City Engineer.
X 14. Sanitary se--!pr and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water
District standards. A letter of acceptance is required.
!.1
X 15. Street light locations, as required. are to be approved by the Southern
California Edison Company a:id the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall be decorative
poles with underground service.
15. The following existing streets being torn up by new services will require an
A.C. overlay:
X 17. The followingspecific dimensions, i.e., cu -de -sac radius, street section
widths) are not approved: 150' Radius on Hyssop. (A minimum of 210' Radius
is required.)
_ 18. ?he roi.owing existing streets are substandard:
They will require:
Approvals and : ee
_ 19. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CALTRANS/
San Bernardino County Flood Control District.
X 20. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agen-
cies involved. Approval of the final map ::ill be subject to any requirement .
that may be received from them.
RCE 20
TENTATIVE 14AP t1D. 7349 Page 3
C
X 21. Permits from other agencies will be required as folloWs:
A. Caltrans, for: Encroachment (if required) on Freeway right of way
B. City:
X C. County Dust Abatement District:
D. D.I.S. Trenching Permit if any trenches are over 5' deep:
X Cucamonga County Water District: Sewer and Water
— F. Other: -
Man Control
22. If only a portion of this Flap is recorded, adjustments shall be made to pro-
- vide for two -way traffic and parking on all affected streets.
23. The following lots appear to be substandard in either `- ontage, depth or area
and should be corrected on the final map:
24. All corner lots shall have a corner radius
E. `he right -of -way ine in accord-
- arse with the City of Rancho Cucamonga standards.
25. A Parcel Map shall be recorded prior to the first phase subdivision to prevent
the creation of an unrecognized parcel located
26- The b.:indary of the Tentative t•1ap needs clarification as fol cw
2r. The birder shai be shown to centerline cf existing perimeter streets, or
title er.pianation require'•
40 parcel Mav v:.iver
28. Information submitted at the time of application is / is not sufficient
to support the issuance of a waiver of Parcel Mar Certificate, according to
requirements of the State Map Act and local ordinances.
Flood Control (Bonding is renuired prior to 0 Recording for �
El Building permit for
20_ Proposed subdivision falls within those areas indicated as subject to flood-
- ing under the National Flood Insurance Program. This subdivision will be
subject to the provisions of that program and Ordinance No. 24.
30. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall alo.ig the entire north pro-
- perty line may be required to divert sheet runoff to streets.
Such flow may be required to go under side }walks through culverts.
31. I tin ter surface is above top of curb, 30" walls shall be required at the
back of the sidewalk at all downstream curb returns.
32. Culverts required to be constructed across streets at following locations:__
33. Broad scale hydrologic studies will a require to assess impac o increased
runoff.
Ell
RCE 20
C
TENTATIVE MAP N0. 7349 Page 4
Miscellaneous
X 35. Dust abatement will be made a condition of issuance of the grading permit for
this project.
X 2 6. Noise impact on �":; project will be mitigated in accordance with the Planning
Division r ,port on subject property.
37. This property is not within the present City Boundary and will require
annexation.
38. All information required to be shoes on the tentative map is not shown as re-
quired:_
X 39. Proper grading and erosion control, including the preventation of sedimenta-
tion or damage to offsite property shall be provided for as required.
40. A preliminary soils report will not be required for this site for the follow-
- — ing r- asons: A copy of the soils report furnished to the Building Division
prior to grading wilt be furnished to the Engineering Division.
X 41. The filing of the tentative map or approval of sari =_ does not guarantee thzt
:ewer treatment capacity will be available at the time builling permits are
requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water
�i :trict will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will
not be issued unless said certification is received in writing,
X 42. T;.e City Engineer shall make the determination, in accordance with Section
66436(C)(1) of the Subdivision Map Act, that division and development of the
property will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise
of any public entity or public utility right -of -way or easement and the Sig
ture of any such public entity or public utility may be omitted f,,om the fi
map unless the City is notified in writing of any objection V% said determina-
tion within the specified time limits of said Section.
X 43. At the time of Final Flap submittal, the foliowirg shall be submitted: Traverse
calculations (shiets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and/
or showing original land division, tie n ^+:e'. and bench marks referenced.
44. Development shall be limited to one drive approach per street. Multiple lots
fronting en a single street shall use common drive approaches at lot lines.
X 45. Prior to recording a minimum 40' dedication from the adjacent property to the
north is required for the extension of the existing Hyssop Drive to the project.
A m 'nimum of 2£' wide pavement within the said dedication shall be constructed
to -Iin the existing pavement.
X 46. A 20 water and sewer easement to be located on the north boundary of the
—' tar ';l 'Map shall be delineated on the map. Cucamonga County Water District
is to be contacted for exact location.
X 47. An ensite retention basin per City Standard shall be constructed to retain all
exi:ess runoff from the project site. The location of the basin, the design
cf the inflow and outflow devices and required easements shall be approved by
the City Engineer prior to recordation of the map.
RCE 20
r 1
l_J
' Pane 5
TENTATIVE MAP NO. 7349
Miscellaneous
_
X 48. A C.C. & R for the map declaring the property owners' responsibility
— for maintenance of the detention basin shall be required and a copy,
subject to City Attorney's approval ,shall be recorded concurrent with
the recordation of the map.
Site Development
X 49. Emergency access from the southerly terminus of HyssoD Drive to 4th
Street as shown on the Tentative Map shall be revised and constructed
per Foothill Fire District Standards. This shall be ;stalled or
bonded to prior to recordation of Parcel Map.
50. Street trees, a minimum of 15 gallon size or larger, shall be planted
X
X to an average of every 15' on the west side of Hyssop adjacent to
Freeway right of way. In addition, shrubs shall be planted 4' on
center underneath the trees. Said landscaping shall be installed
prior to recordation.
X 51. A detailed landscape and irri-ution plan shall be submitted to and
approved by the Planning and Engineering Division prior to recordation.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LLOYD B. HUBBS
CITY ENGINEER
BY:
r
E
A
C%:c !1i+
•�fM�r�/�2�
yw G
Iya
L;1 —J
IiY
1477
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.3
7.
13`)1)
_ V
El tTl
LLj
W !o v =
Q a
z.
"2 L^
2 Y<
V Ic et
8
z
_ E
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGINEERING DIVISION
VICINITY MAP
n
N
•.a.V
tit lP.,
P'�ge
•�fM�r�/�2�
C �1•\
fD ._ice �R E_'
�
i
Ul
ul
W
ll
sQ
Y _
�•
n
w�
.-
C
1
a
m
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGINEERING DIVISION
VICINITY MAP
n
N
•.a.V
tit lP.,
P'�ge
RESOLUTION *
OF THE CITV OF
41 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMO GA CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TESTATI E PARCEL
MAP 7349
WHEREAS, an application has been filed for a revision to Resolution
No. 82 -53 for the above - described project; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a duly advertised public
hearing for the above- described project; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission previously conditionally approved
the above- described project.
SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the
toliowing fin clings:
A. The Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the
adopted General Pltr..,
SECTION 2: The Rancho . :ucamenga Planning Commission hereby grants a
revision to Resolution No. 82-1,S3 ror ?lie above- described project for the
following item:
® City Engineer's Re ?art - Condition t'o. 48
SECTION 3: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby amends
Resolution No. �3, (City Engineer's Report - Condition No. 48) to read as
follows:
A Landscape Maintenance District shall be formed for the
future maintenance of the detention basin, storm drain,
and landscaping prior to the recordation of the Parcel
Mao.
APPROVED AND ADOPTE) THIS 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 1983.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF P.4NCHO CUCAMONGA
BY
Herman Rempel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Planning Commission
Resolution No.
Page 2
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 22nd day of June, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
I.
A
0
i.
El
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 22, 1983
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: STATUS UPDATE ON THE FOLLOWING:
Con itiona Use ermit = - JJ'S ARCADE - 6642 & 6646
Carnelian
Conditional Use Fermit 82 -27 - Galaxy Arcade - 9685 Base
Line Road
SUMMARY: In approving the Conditional Use Permits for the
above - described arcades, the Planning Commission required that their
operation be monitored for six months and a report brought back to the
Commission. The attached letter was mailed to solicit comments
regarding the arcade operations from businesses within the same shopping
centers as the arcade, Sheriff's Department, and nearby public
schools. Attached for your information and review are the responses
received to date. Also attached are the conditions of approval for both
arcades.
ANALYSIS: Basically, both arcades received favorable comments from
surrounding businesses. The Galaxy Arcade (CUP 82 -27) has received
complaints of loud music, trash, and broken bike racks. Staff has
visited the premises and met with the owner. The following measures
have been agreed to by the owner:
o The video game machines have been pulled farther away from the
walls. In addition, the music level will be kept at a moderate
level, during business hours of surraunding businesses.
o Trash receptacles have been installed in front of the arcade-
0
Concrete cement poles will be installed to prevent automobiles
from backing into bicycle racks.
ITEM F
Status Update/CUP 82 -15 & CUP 82 -27
June 22, 1383
Page 2
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that staff continue to monitor both
arcade operations through the code enforcement program to insure
continued compliance with conditions of approval and notify the
Commission of any enforcement problems.
Resp �tfu ly omitted,
Rick me
City lanner
4G:DC:jr
Attachments: Location Map
Conditions of Approval
Letter Sent to Surrounding Businesses & Agencies
Response to Letter
11
r 1
u
I]
DATE:
T0:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CI'T'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
June 22, 1983
Members of the Planning Commission
Rick Gomez, City Planner
Dan Coleman, Associate Planner
1977
JJ'S ARCADE:
The following comments were received:
o Radio Shack: No problems with arcade
GALAXY ARCADE:
The following comments were received:
o Walker & Lee Real Estate:
(1) Not opposed to arcade; owner has been trying to do a good
job.
(2) Needs more waste baskets - a lot of trash comes from Pup
N' Taco
(3) Repair bicycle racks
(4) Turn down music during business hours of nearby tenants
c Drs. Ponce and McKinstet, D.D.S.:
(1) No objections to arcade
(2) Repair bicycle racks
o The Donut Shop
(1) New Year's Eve party resulted in trash in parking lot
RG:DC:jr
E
ONTARIO INTERNATIONAL AOMOwr.
CITY OF RANCHO CEM
MA P
RESOLUTION N0. 82 -83A C
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 82 -15 FOR AN ARCADE
LOCATED AT 6642 AND 6646 CARNELIAN IN THE C -1 ZONE
WHEREAS, on the 25th day of August, 1982, the Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 82 -83, appro•:` -q Condi long] use
Permit No. 82 -15; and =
WHEREAS, on the 13th day of October, 1982, the Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the appl-ican s request
to change the address from the original approval granted by the Planning
Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed this request and found
it necessary to modify the Conditions of Approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Rancho Cucamonga Planning
Commission that Section 2, Condition No. 9, of Planning Commission Resolution
No. 82 -83 be amended to read as fc, "lows:
9. Two parking stalls adjacent to the Arcade shall be
striped and designated for "bicycle only" parking
and provided with security bicycle racks to the
satisfaction of the City Planner prior to
occupancy. Additional bicycle racks may be required
as the number of machines increases, to be
11 A
etermined by ti -e City Planner.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Commission that all other Conditions of Approval contained in
Resolution No. 82 -83 shall apply to Conditional Use Permit No. 82 -15.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1982.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF
BY:
F.11
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Secretary of the Planning Commission
I, .TACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commiss'on held
on the 13th day of October, 1982, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ASSENT:
COMMISSIONERS
CMIMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
MCNIEL, STOUT, BARKER, RSMPEL
NONE
KING
C. C
1.
RESOLUTION 140. 82 -83
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCP+MONGA PLANNING
COMIISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
NO. 82 -15 FOR AN ARCADE LOCATED AT 6652
CARNELIAN IN THE C -1 ZONE
WHEREAS, on the 28th day of July, 1982, a complete application
was filed by Joseph Mannella for review of the above- described project;
a ^�
WHEREAS, on the 25th day of Aucust, 1982, the Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described
project.
NOES, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission
resolved as follows:
SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met:
1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General
Plan, and the purposes of the zone in which the use
is proposed; and
2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety, or welfare, or materially
injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity; and
3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the
applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance.
SECTION 2: That Conditional Use Permit No. 82 -15 is
approved subject to the following conditions:
1. No person under 18 years of age may enter, be or
remain in any part of a game arcade after curfew.
This limitation shall be prominently posted at the
entrance of the facility, in letters not less than
1" in height, and shall be enforced by the adult
supervisor.
Resolutio No. 8213
Page % C
2.
The following levels of adult, 21 years of age or older,
supervision shall be maintained at all times during
business hours:
1 -25 Amusement Devices - 1 Adult Supervisor
26 -50 Amusement Devices - 2 Adult Supervisors
51 + Amusement Devices - 2 Adult Supervisors, plus
1 Uniformed Security Guard
3.
Separate public restrooms for men and women rust be provided
within the approved building and controlled.
4.
An interior waiting area with seating facilities must be
provided for patrons wishing to relax or wait for an amuse-
ment device to become available.
5.
Change- making or token exchange facilities shall be pro-
vided for patron use inside the premises.
6.
adequate exterior lighting shall be provided for evening
security adjacent to all entrances and exterior walls of
the building where the games are located. All lighting
shall be arranged and shielded so as to eliminate excessive
glare or reflection onto adjoining properties or businesses.
7.
Access to the game area must be from the main entrance to
the primary use and not from a separate exterior entrance.
The rear exit shall be for "Fire Exit Only ".
S.
Adequate interior clear space shall be provided for safe
and convenient patron circulation and shall meet the following
minimum standards:
a) Amusement devices shall be located no closer than 12"
from any wall assembly separating the arcade from any
adjacent building ro portion of a building.
b) Provide a minimum of 60" between amusement devices
and any entrance or exit.
c) Where amusement devices are located along one side of
an aisle, provide a minimum unobstructed aisle width
of 66 ". Where amusement devices are located atonq
both sides of any aisle, provide a minimum unob-
structed aisle width of 90 ".
d) Additional interior clear space may be required by the
Building Official, Foothill Fire District, or Sheriff's
Department in order to maintain public safety.
is
Resolution rho. 87 1;3
Page 3,
9. Two parking stalls adjacent to the arcade shall be striped
and designated for "bicycle only" narking and provided with
security bicycle racks to the satisfaction of the City
Planner. They shall be installed prior to occupancy.
10. All signs on the exterior of the building or visible
from the outside, such as window signs, shall require
Planning Division approval in accordance with the Sian
Ordinance.
11. No amusement device shall he used for purposes of or in
connection with gambling. The winning of anything of
value shall constitute oainbling, except the winning of
a-prize in a scheduled tournament.
12. No persons shall be permitted to enter, be o:, remain in
any part of the arcade while in the possession of, con-
suming, using or under the influence of any alcoholic
beverage or drugs. This shall be prominently posted
inside the arcade in letters not less than 1" in height
and shall be enforced by the adult supervisor.
13. The walls, ceiling or floor, or any combination thereof,
of the building or structure, or portion thereof, shall
be insulated or otherwise constructed so that no noise
f or vibration that is detectable without the aid of any
mechanical device or instrument will be allowed to be on
the outer perimeter of the arcade.
14. This approval shall become null and void if a Certificate
of Occuoancy is not issued within 18 months from the date
of approval, unless an extension has been granted by the
Planning Commission. This CUP steal" be monitored and
brought back to the Planninq Commission within six (6)
months from occupancy to review compliance with all
Conditions of Aoproval and applicable City Ordinances.
Failure to comply with Conditions of Approval or applicable
City Ordinances shall cause the suspension of the Conditional
Use Permit and possible revocati -m of the Conditional Use
Permit by the Planning Commission.
15. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with
all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other appli-
cable City Ordinances in effect at the time a Certificate
of Occupancy is granted.
16. This approval shall run with the applicant and shall become
void upon a change of ownership or if the business operation
ceases.
Resolution No. 32X
Page 4
17. The parking lot shall be posted "Ho Loitering" in
letters not less than 1" in height on signs to the
satisfaction of the City Planner and Sheriff's
Department.
E a.m. Hands not later than shall be
p.m. for arcades located
in the C -1 zone.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1932.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF CITY OF RANCHO CUCXJIONGA
BY.
Je- r Kid C yarn n
r ,
ATT
Spi,rpt-ary of the Planning Commission
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning CommissionCity oduly nand
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the fore the gPla Resolution nnina Commission of the
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by Planning Commission held
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the
on the 25th day of August, 1952, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Stout, Rempel, Barker, McNiel, King
NOES: CONLMISSIO�:ERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
E
f:
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -113
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 82 -27 FOR AN ARCADE
LOCATED AT 9085 BASE LINE IN THE C -1 -T ZONE
WHEREAS, on the 17th day of November, 1982, a complete application
was fi led by Tom Leslie and Michael Infante for review of the above - described
project; ana
WHEREAS, on the 8th day of December, 1982, the Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described
project.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as
follows:
SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met:
1 That the proposed use is in accord with the General
Plan, and the purposes of the zone in which the use
is proposeo; and
2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety, or welfare, or materially
injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity; and
3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the
applicable previsions of the Zoning Ordinance.
SECTION 2: That Conditional Use Permit No. 82 -27 is approved
subject to the following conditions:
PLANNING DIVISION
1. No person under 18 years of age may enter, be or
remain in any part of a game arcadq during the hours
school is in regular session and after curfew. This
limitation shall be prominently posted at the
entrance of the facility, in letters not less than
1" in height, and shall be enforced by the adult
supervisor.
2. The following levels of adult, 21 years of age or
older, supervision shall be maintained at all times
during business hours:
OR
7. Access to the game area must be from the main
entrance to the primary use and not from a separate
exterior entrance. The rear exit shall be for °Fire
Exit Only ".
8. Adequate interior clear space shall be provided for
safe and convenient patron circulation and shall
meet the following minimum standards:
(a) Amusement devices shall be located no closer
than 12" from any wall assembly separating the
arcade from any adjacent building or portion of
a building.
(b) Provide a minimum of 60" between amusement
devices and any entrance or exit.
(c) Where amusement devices are located along one
side of an aisle, provide a minimum
unobstructed aisle width of 660. Where
amusement devices are located along both sides
of any aisle, provide a minimum unobstructed
is aisle width of 90 ".
Resolution No.
82 -11(
Page 2
1 -25 Amusement Devices: - 1 Adult Supervisor
26 -50 Amusement Divices: - 2 Adult Supervisors
51 + Amusement Device: _ Adult Supervisors,
,s 1 Uniformed
:curity Guard
3.
Separate public restrooms for men and women must
be
provided within the approved building and
controlled.
4.
An interior waiting area with seating facilities
must be provided for patrons wishing to relax
or
wait for an amusement device to become available.
5.
Change - making or token exchange facilities shall
be
provided for patron use inside the premises.
6.
Adequate exterior lighting shall be provided
for
evening sea«-ity adjacent to all entrances
and
exterior walls of the building where the games
are
located. All lighting shall be arranged
and
shielded so as to eliminate excessive glare
or
reflection onto adjoining properties or businesses.
7. Access to the game area must be from the main
entrance to the primary use and not from a separate
exterior entrance. The rear exit shall be for °Fire
Exit Only ".
8. Adequate interior clear space shall be provided for
safe and convenient patron circulation and shall
meet the following minimum standards:
(a) Amusement devices shall be located no closer
than 12" from any wall assembly separating the
arcade from any adjacent building or portion of
a building.
(b) Provide a minimum of 60" between amusement
devices and any entrance or exit.
(c) Where amusement devices are located along one
side of an aisle, provide a minimum
unobstructed aisle width of 660. Where
amusement devices are located along both sides
of any aisle, provide a minimum unobstructed
is aisle width of 90 ".
13. The walls, ceiling or floor, or any combination
thereof, of the building or structure, or portion
thereof, shall be insulated or otherwise constructed
so that no vibration that is detectable without the
aid of any mechanical device or instriment will be
allowed to be on the outer perimeter of the arcade.
14. Mis approval shall become null and vu=d if a
Certificate of Occupancy is not issued within 18
months from the date of approval, unless an
extension has been granted by the Planning
Commission. This CUP shall be monitored and brought
back to the Planning Commission within six (6)
months from occupancy to review compliance with all
Conditions of Approval and applicable City
ordinances. Failure to comply with Conditions of
Approval or applicable City Ordinances shall cause
the suspension of the Conditional Use Permit and
possible revocation of the Conditional Use Permit by
the Planning Commission. is
i
. Resolution No.
Page 3
(d) Additional interior clear space may be required
by the Building Official, Foothill Fire
District, or Sheriff's Department in order to
maintain public safety.
9.
Two parking stalls adjacent to the arcade shall be
striped and designated for "bicycle only" parking
and provided with security bicycle racks to the
satisfaction of the City Planner. They shall be
installed prior to occupancy.
10.
All signs on the exterior of the building or visible
from the outside, such as window signs, shall
require Planning Division approval in accordance
with the Sign Ordinance.
11.
No amusement device shall be used for purposes of or
in connection with gambling. The winning of
anything of value shall constitute gambling, except
the winning of a prize in a scheduled tournament.
12.
No persons shall be permitted to enter, be or remain
in any part of the arcade while in the possession
of, consuming, using or under the influence of any
alcoholic beverage or drugs. This shall be
prominently posted inside the arcade in letters not
less than 1" in height and shall be enforced by the
adult supervisor.
13. The walls, ceiling or floor, or any combination
thereof, of the building or structure, or portion
thereof, shall be insulated or otherwise constructed
so that no vibration that is detectable without the
aid of any mechanical device or instriment will be
allowed to be on the outer perimeter of the arcade.
14. Mis approval shall become null and vu=d if a
Certificate of Occupancy is not issued within 18
months from the date of approval, unless an
extension has been granted by the Planning
Commission. This CUP shall be monitored and brought
back to the Planning Commission within six (6)
months from occupancy to review compliance with all
Conditions of Approval and applicable City
ordinances. Failure to comply with Conditions of
Approval or applicable City Ordinances shall cause
the suspension of the Conditional Use Permit and
possible revocation of the Conditional Use Permit by
the Planning Commission. is
Resolution No. 82 -S
Page 4
15. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance
with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all
other applicable City Ordinances in effect at the
time a Certificate of Occupancy is gra"teu'-
16. This approval shall run with the applicant and shall
become void upon a change of ownership or if the
business operation, ceases.
17. The parking lot shall be posted "No Loitering" in
letters not less than 1" ip. height on signs to the
satisfaction of the City Planner and Sheriff's
Department.
18. The hours of operation shall be no earlier than
10 a.m. and no later than 11 p.m. for arcades
located in the C -1 zone.
19. Applicant shall contact Planning Staff for
inspection to determine compliance with improvement
requirements prior to occupancy.
20. Prior to occupancy the applicant shall make
reasonable effort to obiain a letter from previous
applicant for CUP 82 -16, Ronald Walls, requesting
revocation of approval for !:L'P 82 -16, or the
applicant shall obtain a letter from property owner
stating that he will not lease 9687 Base Lire for an
arcade pursuant to CUP 82 -16, nor will tiie lessee of
9687 Base Line be -, sublessee of an arcade.
APPROVED AND ADOPT: E-^ -:',S 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1982.
PLA!Je—f ING;O, IS ION OF TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY •
fre K� ng, 9hairman
ATTESJ=
eg-rerary of the Planning.Commission
I, JACK LA4, Secretary of the Planning Commission of tt-e City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular :meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 8th day of December, 1982, by the following vote -to -wit:
Resolution No. 82 -S
Page 5
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
i
Stout, McNiel, Barker, Rempel, King
None
None
11
v
11
May 16, 1983
SUBJECT:
Gentlemen:
As you are probably aware, the above - described arcade has been in
operation for approximately six months. In approving the Conditional
Use Permit, the Planning Commission required that the arcade operation
be monitored to review compliance with conditions of approval. Because
your business or agency is located near or is affected by this arcade
we are particularly interested in receiving your comments regarding
the arcade operation.
It is anticipated that a report will be presented to the Planning
Commission on June 22, 1983. If you should have any comments
concerning the operation of this arcade, please write or call me
at (714) 989 -1851. Your comments would be most helpful if received
by June 10, 1983.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
Sincerely,
COMKJNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DIVISIOW
DAN COLEMAN
Associate Planner
DC/ kep
El
;; iEtV E u
�1 I Y OF RANG`O CUCAMONGA
CUMMUhITY PEVE' nnAFu D rL
JUN G 2 1983
Apt
7@8,9i1Gs11A211 e2t3i415j 6
RANCHO CUCAMONGA SCHWINN CYCLERY
9687 BASELINE RD.
RANCHO CUCA!"MONGA, CAL 91750
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Community Development Department
9320 Baseline Rd
Rancho Cucamonga, Cal. 91730
ATTN. DAN COLEMAN /GALAXY ARCADE
Dear Sir,
This letter is in response to your inquiry of May 16, 1983,
concerning the operation of the Galaxy Arcade at 9685 Baseline Rd.
Please be informed that my business is located next door to the
Galaxy Arcade and I have been in this location since Februay 1,
1983. During this time I have not had any problems with the arcade
or it's owner, Mr Tom Leslie. The arcade appears to be run very
well and there have been no incidents at the center concerning
it's patrons. My only conplaint has been with the loud music
played by the arcade, but each time I have mentioned this to
Mr Leslie, he has alwasys complied by lowering the volume. I feel
that the Galaxy Arcade is compatable with the shopping centers
other tenants as well.
Sin ly,
t VZ2-���
GERALD N. A
Rancho Cucamonga Schwinn Cyclery.
�J
INTER-OFFICE MEMO
DATE rune 7, 1953
ROM gas [dices, Captain
Rancho ojcamonga Sheriff's Station
TO Di Colemm, Associate Pl`_Dm
City of Rancho Cuca=n&a
SUBJECT JJ' s Arcade /Qalaxy Arcade
E
11
PHONE
Per your request for any infon:�a� o= Dery n� and requ sP - arty infor-
operaticros , Z have contacted my field simervis presentation to the Pia ing
cation that �t be of value to you in y eve nature
C�ssi�n. �e
only infoaaatis�n I nave received of i nega
was that the CaalaxY
Arcade frecjt t1Y Plays their un>sic loud enaug to °)'
the other business operators near th'-
'IW:lb
SS3]ss00 a«, un