Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1983/08/25 - Agenda Packet
Ai Nt � I.0 1'y C � �: • C. �. '� '. 1 y � y � I • � ! r �h, a r� i s M i .., W � y I+ 1 J l \ fy. t��6 1� y 1 �., I }. 3• -�k �. .�- " "1 it � F`az' ' J�.. r .i . �,, :_r• . + �� %„ s - t �`�. a.. � �,f.c } r -L. _. `. �$.: i'. . 1 .. ,o S �, l• IL � � � ily+f t ..f ..�'e.. .,.. �+ • °� ,� J. _1� � 0�- L h• �1'. ,(' t \ � r� �Y +'., `. f' �, .�� ��• :. '� y_ ..' �' �" .. � :� �i .;� j. .. /'' 7.r . '., _ •. ,, ., v 1'77 ACTION MY OF R4 NC,I-i0 CLILIO_ .`EGA P.AINNINGY AGEN WEDNESDAY August 24, 1983 7:03 P.M. LIONS PARK COMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE, RAPiC1:0 r-UC .MONGA, (,ALIFORr7IA 1 :00 P.M. L Pledge of Allegiance EL Roll Call. Commissioner Barker X Commissioner Rempel Excused Commissioner Juarez X Commissioner Stout X Commissioner McNieA xcused APPROVED 3 -0 -2 -0 HL A_gxoval of Minutes AS AMENDED August 10, 1983 Iv. Consent Calendar The following Consent Calendar items are emected to be routine 4nd rion- controversial. They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be rzrro1ad for discussion. APPROVED 34 -2 -0 A. EN',IRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT kith removal r f Item D. REVIEW 83 -23 - MULLER - The development of two distribution bwl�dan s 150,083 and 145,233 sq. ft.) on 13.68 acres of land in the Industrial Park and General Industriai areas (Subareas 6 & 10) located on the north side of Acacia Street at Utica Avenue - APN 209 -401 -2 & 3. B. TRACT 9351 - LEWIS HOMES - Reapplication for design rteiew of 42 single family homes on 37.8 acres of land in the R- 1- 10,000, R- 1- 12,000, and R- 1- 20,000 zones located south of Banyan Street west of Sapphire Street. C. ENViRCNMENTAL ASSESSMENT rUx tvnvnr.vrivanrXi REVIEW 83 -20 - BWLC - The development of a 15,600 square foot industrial building on 4.8 acres of land in the General Industrial/RaL Served category (Subarea 5), located at 8977 Center Street - APN 20S- 242-09 & 209 - 251 -09. REMOVED Approved D. TIME EXTENSION FOR CUP 81 -02 - ANDERSON - The i development o s retail center on 1.5 acres o land m the C -i Time Extension for th4rty zone to be located at the northwest corner of Arrow Route (30) days. Directed and Turner - APN 208 - 321 -32. staff to work with appli- cant to resolve landscaping requirements & to bring the item back to the Commission 9- 28-83. Y^ Planning Connsission Agende August 24, 1983 Page 3 8:35 P.M. to VE Adjoumment August 30, 1983 - Review of Foothills The pkming Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations Community Plan, 7 p.m. that set an 11 pm. adjournment time. If items go beyond that Lions Park Community tame, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Center. Commission. 7-he planning Commission will adjourn to a Development Code public hearing, September 6, 1983, 6:30 p.m. at Lions Park community .;enter, 916E Base Line, Rancho Cucamonga. Planning Commission AgeRdd August 24, 1983 Page 2 V. public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. APPROVED - 3 -0 -2 -0 * E. APPROVED - 3 -0 -2 -0 F. xith requirement for a Lien Agreement for 12 kv underground cable. CONTINUED - 3- 0 -2 -QE G. To September 14, 1983 AND PARCEL MAP slur_ DA0N CORPORATION - A division of 7.90 acres mto z parcels within Subarea 7 of the Industrial Specific Plan area located on the north side of Arrow Route, east of Utica Avenue - APN 208 -052 -1 through 70. PARCEL MAP 8060 - BARNES - A division of 1.4 acres or Tana witnin buoaren s oL the Industrial Specific Plan area located at the northwest corner of 9th Street and Helms Avenue - APN 209- 022 -12. MAP 5100 - BWLC - A division of 9.82 acres into z parcels wlcnia usr ;, -� and R -3 zones located at the northwest corner of Fo3thill Boulevard and Ramona Avenue - APN 1077- 621 -28, 31. CONTINUED - 3 -0 -2-0 * H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMiN'i' A14IJ 1J$YGLVr1nr. : z To September 14, 1983 REVIEW 83 -17 - BARMAKIAN -The development of 68 apartment units on 4.86 acres in the R -3 zone located on the east side of Ramona, north of Foothill. - APN 1077 - 621 -31 (a portion). VL Director's Reports CONSENSUS - That a I. 73SE DETERMINATION - BLANCO INVESTMEFIS - A mini - storage could be request to determine if amini- storage facility would be considered in a C -2 zone considered similar to other uses permitted in the C -2 zone. with a CUP. proposed project to be located on the southeast corner of Hel ms Avenue and Hampshire Street. RECOVNENDATION OF J. HERITAGE PARK SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL i/ii. Pubiie Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be disc=ed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. * This protect falls within the boundaries of the Redevelopment Area. 0WAX1C tul[RWa�IDRA_ 1mpc*r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA OF RANCHO T 4a;CA/IN10\'GA tta T7 AGENT A 1977 WEDNESDAY Aagust 24, 1983 7:00 p.m. LIONS PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE, RANCF 0 CUCkMONGA, CALIFORNIA L Pledge of Allegiance IL Ron can Commissioner Barker _ Commissioner Juarez Commissioner McNiel M. IV. Approval of Minutes A 10, 1983 Consent Calendar u•�✓� � acy_ Commissioner Rempei_ Commis�'nnerSt0t" The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non- controversiaL They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussior-. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. A. distribution buildings 150,080 and 145,233 sq. ft.) on 13.68 acres of land in the Industrial Park and General Industrial areas 'Sui,ireas 6 & 10) located on the north side of Acar.'g Street et Utica Avenue - APN 209 - 401 -2 do 3. E. TRACT 9351 - LEWIS HOMES - Reapplication for design review of 42 single family homes on 37.8 acres of land in the R -1- 10,000, R- 1- 12,000, and R- 1- 20,00 zones located south of Banyan Street west of Sapphire Street. C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELUY32nN -r EV1EW 83 -20 - BW LC - The development of a 15,600 square oat industrial building on 4.8 acres of land in the General Industrial/Rail Served category (Subarea 5;, located at 5977 Center Street - APN 209 - 242 -09 do 209 - 251 -09. D. TIME EXTENSION FOR CUP 81 -02 - ANDERSON - The development of a retail center on 1.5 acres or in the C -1 zone to be located at the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Turner - APN 208 - 321 -32. Planning Commission Agenda August .24, 1983 Page 2 V. Public Hearings 7-e following items are public hearings in which concerned inalividuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shalt be limited to S mirrrtes per individual for each project. * E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8106 - DAON CORPORATION - A division of 7.90 acres into 2 parcels within Subarea 7 of the Indus'.rial Specific Plan area located on the north side of Arrow Route, east of Utica Avenue - APN 208 -052 -1 through 70. F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8060 - BARNES - A division of 1.4 acres of land within Subarea 3 of the industrial Specific Plan area located at the northwest corner of 9th Street and Helms Avenue - APN 209 - 022 -12. * G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8100 - BWLC - A division of 9.82 acres into 2 parcel, within the C -2 and R -3 zones located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Ramona Avenue - APN 1077- £21 -28, 31. * H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT A141) 1thV1hW J63-1'[ - t$AILIYIArJAr+ - lilC UCVCi1JE]111U1L ail VQ ape. -tmert units on 4.86 acres in the R -3 zone located on the east side of Ramona, north of Foothill - APN I J77- 621 -31 (a portion). i. L USE DETERMINATION - BLANCO INVESTMENTS - A request to determine if a mini - storage facility would be considered similar to other uses permitted in the C -2 zone. Proposed project to be located on the southeast corner of Hel ms Avenue and Hampshire Street. J. HERITAGE PARK SITE PLAN REVIEW Vii. Public Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. * This project falls within the boundaries of the Redevelopment Area. f,= s Planning Convnission Agenda August .24, 2983 Page 3 VIII. Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 p.m. ad;ournment time. If items go beyond that time, they simll be heard only with the consent of the Commission. The Planning Commission will adjourn to a Development Code public hearing, September 6, 1983, 6:30 p.m. at Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line, Rancho Cucamonga. s ONTARIO INTERNATIONAL �M CITY OF RANCHO CUCAN C HrA - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting August 10, 1983 CALL TO ORDER Chairman Dennis Stout called the Regular Meeting of the City of ih ncho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 7 p.m. The meeting was held at the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman Stout then led in the pledge to the flag. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: David Barker, Adeie Juarez, Larry McNiel, Herman Rempel, Dennis Stout ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None STAFF PRESENT: Shintu Bose, Associate Engineer; Rick Gomez, City Planner; Curt Johnston, A3sistant Planner; Michael Vairin, Senior Planner; Joan Kruse, administrative Secretary ANNOUNCESdENTS Senior Planner, Michael Vairin, stated that a series of workshops will begin on August 16, 1983 and continue through October 12, 1983 to review the Draft Development Code for the City. He indicated that these workshops will be public hearings and would start at 6:30 p.m. rather than the regular meeting time of 7 p.m. Mr. Vairin indicated that this meeting will adjourn to the first public hearing scheduled on August 16. ! * ! f ! APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Juarez, carried unanimously, to approve the Planning Commission minutes of July 27, 1983. : i : i ! CONSENT CALENDAR Commissioner Rempel asked that Item A be removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion. Commissioner Barker asked that Item C also be removed Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Barker, carried uuanimmously, to adopt Item A of the Consent Calendar. Mr. King stated that as the tract is presently formulated, it should not be allowed and should be totally reworked for single family residences or multiple family use with significant open space_ ?is indicated, that i_n present form, the development: is totally inappropriate for that location. Chairman Stout asked that more material on this discussion, including the minutes, be providea to the Commission. Chairman Stout also asked that the Commission's concern be conveyed to the applicant so that this concern may be addressed. Mr. Gomez stated that a letter would be directed to the applicant the following day. 0 * i ! 0 C. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 10210 - FORECAST MORTGAGE - A custom lot residential subdivision of 33 acres into 37 lots in the R -1- 20,000 and R -1 -1 acre zone, generally located on the north side of Almond, between S2pphire and Turquoise. Commissioner Barker stated that Item E5 of the conditicns of approval has been rewritten and asked that the new condition be substituted for the original condition of approval. Mr. Gomez stated that e:: July 6, 1983, this tentative tract was approved by the Equestrian Committee. Commissioner Hempel stated that at the time original approval of this tract was given there was a lot of concern that the equestrian trail be taken care of. Fbtion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Hempel, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution 81 -106A approving the time extension for Tentative Tzact 10210, Forecast Mortgage, with the new condition. 0 ■ 0 i i PUBLIC FEARINGS D. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83 -12 - PIERSON - The establishment of a dance school in the Industrial Park zone (Subarea 7) to be located at 10722 Arrow Route, Suites 604 and 606, in the Rancho Cucamonga Business Park. Rick Gomez, City Planner, reviewed the staff report. Mr. Ted Hopson, Assistant City Attorney, asked if the hours of operation will be considered in the Resolution. Mr. Gomez replied that because of the hours selected for use by the applicant staff did not place a condition in the Resolution; however, if the Commission has concern, it could be added as a condition of approval. Planning Commission Minutes -3- August 10, 1983 Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Carol Pierson, 6969 Layton, Rancho Cucamonga, the applicant, stated that the staff report adequately expressed 'their request. Chairman Stout asked the applicant if the Resolution met their expectations. The applicant replied that it does. Commissioner Barker asked how young the students will be. Ms. Pierson_ replied that they will begin, with 7 year olds for regular ballet class. However, there may be a class for creative dance for younger students Who will be closely supervised by their parents. Commissioner Barker asked Ms. Pierson about the statement that students will be dropped off at frrow. Ms. Pierson replied that this would not be the case in actuality as there will be a policy statement issued to parents at the time of enrollment that students must be escorted into the dance studio. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Mc Niel stated that the two buildings are at different elevations and asked if the floors are at the same level. Fr. Jim Barton, developer of the industrial site, replied that they are. Motic": Moved by Hempel, seconded by MoNiel, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 83 -102 approving CUP 83 -12. Chairman Stout stated that the operating hours should be part of the Resolution. Commissioner Hempel stated he did not feel it would have any effect to be a part of the Resolution. Commissioner Barker stated that since this is a CUP, it can be brought back for review by the Commission. Chairman Stout asked what will occur if they operate until midnight. He indicated he would be more comfortable if the hours or operation were .rot down in writing. Commissioner Hempel stated that it does not bother him and indicated the Resolution is all right as written. Planning Commission Minutes -4- P_ugust 10, 1983 A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR BEVE:OIWENT REVIEW 83 -18 - BARTCN - The development of a 22,393 square foot industrial building on 1.12 acres of land in the Industrial Park category (Subarea 7), located at the southwest corner of Civic Center Drive and Utica Avenue' - APN 208- 622 -02 K 03. i i / * f rimE EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 10035 - R.H. ASSOCIATES - A residential subdivision of 15.7 acres of land in'--o 38 custorL lots in.. the R -1 zone, located south and east of Red Iiill Country Club Drive, .3outh of Celle Carazon - APN 207-101-37 & 207 - 092 -10. Commissioner Rempel stated his concern with this property is that Lhere is another piece of property to the west which is landlocked with a long railroad strip without access. further, there is already a developed tract north of this property and Commissioner Rempel stated he felt that some provision should be made to have another access into this property. Chaa.rman Stout asked if anything had been filed on the parcel west of this property. Commissioner Rempel stated that the area to the west has been :aveloped into condominiums and totally blocks this property. Further, that unless the owner cants to give up a lot for street access, the extension requested should be denied. Mr. Vairin stated that the current expiration date on this property is September 25. further, that the applicant could be contacted in order to be mmde aware of the Commission's concern. Mr. Vairin stated that no action at this meeting would mean that the applicant would still have time to make adjustment to the map before its expiration. Chairman Stout asked if a representative from R.H. Associates, the applicant, was present at this meeting. No one spoke. Motion: roved by Rempel, sec-)nded by Barker, carried unanimously, that this item be brought back to the Fanning Commission at their first regular meeting in September. Mr. Jeff King, 9375 Archibald, addressed the Commission stating that when Tentative Tract No. 10035 came before the Commission there was a great deal of discussion because it was landlocked and also because of existing slope, grading, drainage and aesthetics. further, that after the Commission, had appro,red this tentative tract, the feeling of the Commission :.as that it was a mistake. Planning Commission Minutes -2- August 10, 1983 E. .AMENDYXNT TO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TRACT 12237 - SCOTT - Located on the east side of Hermosa at the north city limits. Modification of a storm drain condition by bonding. Shintu Bose, Associate Civil Engineer, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout asked if there will be a new Resolution replacing Condition fc. 10 with a new Condition No. 10 and adding a new Condition No. 15. Mai. Bose replied that this is correct. Further, that Conditions 13 and 14 on Resolution No. 83 -08 would be deleted. vu. Bose stated that Condition No, 15 was added because if the City does not require the improvement at the southerly tract boundary they will not be able to install the street at this time because there is a natural drainage cour::e down there. He indicated that they can build the street at the same time. Chairman Stout asked if a storm drain will be put in at that time. Mr. Bose replied that it will not because the street will handle it. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Mlr. Richard Scott, 1111 W. 9th Street, Upland, the developer, stated that he is in agreement with the resolution conditions as amended and had posted the necessary bond per the revisions. There being no farther comments, the public hearing was closed. Notion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Mc Niel, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 83 -08A, changing Condition No. 10, deleting conditions 13 and 14 and adding Condition 15. i i f o 0 F. AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TRACT 12305 - ROY - Located on the north side of 19th Street on the east :side of Hellman Avenue. Modification of a storm drain condition by street widening. Shintu Bose, Associate Civil Engineer, reviewed the staff report. Commissioner Barker asked how deep the water will get on 19th Street. ttr. Bose replied that it will flow over the street to the south side. N1:'. Bose stated that this will only increase the runoff by a very small amount. FLrther, that even if a bigger pipe was provided, it will not carry more water. Chairman Stout stated that there is an existing problem.with the pipe in that it silts up. He asked where it begins. Planning Commission Minutes •5- August 10, 1983 Mr. Bose replied that it goes along 19th_ Street to the culvert past Amethyst. Chairman Stout ask?d if i.t would sheet flow to Amethyst and hoer it will get apress Amethyst. Further, will it eliminate the puddle on 19th. Mr. Bose answered it will sheet flow across and that puddling will be eliminated. Chairman_ Stout opened the public hearing. Mr. Gary Andreasen, engineer for this project, stated that they have made a study which -..,as pro-Tided to staff indicating that by widening 19th Street it will accomplish more than installing a bigger pipe. Chzirmzn Stout stated that it doesn 't look like a solution is close. Mr. Andreason replied that this is a better solution. Further, that CalTrans did not want a s�-orm drain as they thought widening the street would be better. .,sere being no further questions or comments, the public hearing was dosed. Motion: Waved by McKie!, seconded by Juarez, carried unanimously, to adept Resolution. No. 82 -112A, amending the conditions of approval for Tract 12304. G. ENVIBON-MENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CKANGE 83 -02 - LEE - A change of zone from A -1 (Limited Agriculture) to R -3 (Multi- Family Residential) for 1.93 a - -res of land located on the west side of Vineyard Avenue between Arrow Route and Foothill Boulevard - APN 247 - 211 -24. NEW BUSIIrESS H. ENVIROW'sr —AL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RErIEW 83 -18 - LEE - The development of 24 apartmfnt units on 1.93 acres of land in the A -1 zone (R -3 pending) located on the west side of Vineyard Avenue between Arrow Route and Foothill Boulevard - ZPN 207- 211 -24. R,Lc.=.ael "—f—L., Senior Planner, reviewed Items G and H concurrently. Mr. Vairin stated that there would be additional conditions to those contained in the staff report placed cn this project as distributed to the Commission at this meeting. Mr. Vairin read into the record z letter received from Ms. Connie Reece. opposing the requested change of zone from R -1 to R -3. Corsmissioner Rempel asked, regarding the last condition, if staff is really going to rave a left turn with an assigned speed of 45 mph. Mr. Vairin explained that the lane itself will be designed to accept vehicles entering at that speed. Planning Commission Minutes -6- August 10, 1983 Chairman Stout asked if these conditions would be placed under the Planning Division in the Resolution. , Mr. Vairin replied that with the exception of Condition No. 6, they would all be Planning Division conditions. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Mr. William Lee, 830 W. 6th Street, Ontario, sated he has worked closely with staff since the conception of this project and concurs with the conditions of approval. Further, that his concern isnucho be same astthatcof be City Iand Planning Commission in wanting project stated that they will build the project and retain ownership in it. Ms. Connie Reece, Alta Iom2 resident and writer of the letter opposing the zone change, addressed the Commission. She indicated she has be resident of this area for the past eight years and did not like the chang e area from the rural atmosphere that once existed here. Commissioner Rempel replied that he too would like things to be the way the.' were but it is impassible. Be asked Ms. Reece why she did nothc Genera PLsnt the time of the Ge.'ieral Plan hearings. R° explained was formed which allows higher density at major thorough s� fareandthe could philosophy of providing affordable housing by increasing y w not otherwise be provided. Commissioner Rempel stated that the General Plan was adopted after much public input and that ;:he C— Council and Planning Commission decision was based on this public input. Ms. Reece stated that she wish ^.d to get a different designation for her property so that she can sell it for a higher price. Com=i.ssioner Rempel advised her to bring her request to staff so that it could be placed before the Commission. There being no furt;.er comments, the public hearing was closed- Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Rempel, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 63 -103, issuing a Negative Declaration and requesting approval of zone change 83 -02 by the City Council. ,,otion• Moved by Barker, seconded by Rempel, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 83 -104 approving Development Review 83 -18 with the moo_fi ^atiens as presented by staff and issuing a N gative Declaration. Ir, Vairin sated to Ms. Reese that she will receive another notification when this zone change comes before the City Council. t a � • t �- August 10, 1983 Planning Commission Minutes ., ADJOIIF.IONT Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Juarez, carried unanimou iy, to adjourn to IAugust 16, 1983 at 6.30 p.m. to a Work session on the Development Code. 7:53 p.m. The Planning Commission adjourned. Respectfully submitted, RICK GOMEZ, Acting Sectretary Planning Commission Minutes -8- August 10, 1983 11 E 11 MY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DAl -E: August 24, 1983 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner B;': Frank J. Dreckman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 83 -23 - MULL -R - i e eve opment of two istribution bui ings T£SL and 145,233 sq. ft.) on 13.68 acres of land in the Industrial Park and General Industrial areas Subareas 6 & 10; located on the north side of Acacia Street at Utica Avenue - APN 209 -401 -2 & 3. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Issuance of a Negative Declaration B. Purpos- e: Construction of two distribution buildings (150,080 ate- 145,233 square feet) C. Location,: North side of Acacia Street at Utica Avenue D. Parcel Size: 13.68 acres (combined) E. Existing Zoning: Industrial Park, General Industrial F. Existing Land Use: Vacant parcels G. Surrounding Land Use and Zonin North - Vacant, Industrial Park South - Vacant, Industrial Park East - Vacant, General Industrial/Rail Served West - Vacant, Industrial Park H. General Plan Desiqnations: affect Site - Industrial Park /General Industrial North - Industrial Park South - Industrial Park East - General Industrial /Rail Served West - Industrial Park ITEM A Development Review 83- 23/Muller Planning Commission Agenda August 24, 1983 Page 2 11 I. Site Characteristics: The site consists of two vac`nt parcels, lying adjacent to each other, which slope gently from the north to south. Currently, the site contains a variety of indigenous field grasses and native plant materials. No structures are located on the site. Curb and gutter improvements are ex ;sting. These sites are part of an improved industrial subdivision. I1. ANALYSIS: A. General: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant and is attached for your review and consideration. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Assessment and found no significant impacts on the environment as a result of this project. B. Impacts: Development of the project will generate additional traffic and increase the amount of water runoff from the property. However, tt,ese increases are insignificant since the surrounding streets acid drainage facilities will be provided to handle the project increases. III. RECOMMENDATION: Based upon site analysis and the Initial Study, this project will not cause significant adverse impacts on the to environment. If the Commission concurs, issuance of a Negative Declaration for this project would be in order. tted, R ckIGonigp/' City Planner RG:FD:jr Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Plan Exhibit "B" - Elevations Initial Study, Part I 11 CITY OF RANCHO C[.;CANMONGA PL UNNING DV -.rNOti rrr.M. 'I=- EXHIBIT= _t_ SCALE' V� NORTH SOUTH ELEVATION BUILDNG 'w WEST ELEVATION BUILDING we q NORTH ELEVATION BUILDING n T 7 m a V NORTH CITY OF n -E%,.: RANCHO CUCALMONGA -, rrj a: PLANNING DIX'ISIQ\ EXHIBM D SCALE: �^ ¢-� NORTH ELEVATION BUILDING 'B' C r EAST ELEVATION BUILDING �B' 1 I m e a a m FA m =:�— F a �— ex�arn - n r _ SOUTH ELEVATION BUILDING 'B' y x s m o v a a c- ^_ a _ X CITY OF ® RANCHO CJCAMONGA PLANNING DiNrNO.N ITE\ I- TITLE EXHIBIT: � � SCALE-- V FORTH CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORT_,iATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental. Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development RevieT4 Committee through-the department where the protect application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Revie-: .committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Daclaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: ACACIA PARTNERSHIP 83 � APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: ACACIA PARTNERSHIP 8 1100 QUAIL ST. NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 1- 714- �7F -n1 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF OWNER ON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: KnWAT.RWT- HARDING & ASSOC.. INC. LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) LOTS 24 AND 25 - ACACIA STREET PARCELS 24 AND 25 OF PARCEL MAP NO 6194 FOR RANCHO HAVEN BUSINESS PARK -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA_ STATE AND LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL. REGIONAL, FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: I -1 I] [A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION CONST. CF 2 DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES. . — BUILDING ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND-SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE -INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPGGRAPHY• PLANTS {TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): is the project part of a larger project, one of . ,eries of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? PROJECT IS PART OF A MASTRR PLANNED COMMERCE CENTER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. 1-2 C. WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? NO 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? NO 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? Np 4. Create changes in the existing znniny- or general plan designations? _ NO 5. Remo %l e an%r exist- - sees How many? NO 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, fla=ables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: Arm IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above an4 in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be wade by the Development Review Committee. Date Z Z /e6� Signature Title 1-3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CL,CA ro STAFF REPORT � r DATE: August 24, 1983 ?I JII TO: Members of the Planning Commission 1977 FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner IBy: Frank J. Dreckman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TRACT 9351 - LEWIS - Reapplication for Design Review of 42 single family homes on 37.8 acres of land in the R- 1- 10,000, R- 1- 12,000, and R- 1- 20,000 zones located south of Banyan Street, west of Sapphire Street. BACKGROUND: Lewis Development proposes to develop 42 single family dwelling units on the remaining portion of Tract 9351 located south of Banyan Street, west of Sapphire Street. The tract, previously approved by the County, consists of existing improved streets (curb, gutters, pavement, etc.) and rcugh graded parcels. Incidentally, this tract was previously approved for Mark III Homas, who developed portions of the tract prior to declaring bankruptcy. Lastly, individual parcels are adequate in size and shape to accommodate Lewis's proposed single family residences_ In general, architectural design of these units provides variety and visual interest consistent with the existing neighborhood; however, the Design Review Committee was concerned with pro,01ing additional variety and suggested that unit setbacks be staggered. In addition, the Committee was concerned about blank side and rear elevations secs from public view and suggested that additional wood siding and detail be provided. Conditions reflecting the Committee's recommendations have been included in the attached Resolution_ Due to the fact that the tract (9351) has beer, previously approved, tonight's Planning Commission apprevai will be for design review cn ?y. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all material and elements of this project. if the Commission concurs, adoption of the attached Resolution would be in order. Re ectfully bmitted, 0 ck m z ity Pla r RG:FD:jr Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Plot Plan is Exhibit "B" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "C" - Typical Elevations Exhibit "D" - Previous Conditions_- Tract 9351 (County) ITEM 8 / _�T...- Al Y• _ 1 yC� . J / Ij• .. -min. n•I�~L/lk,.' � �-- ...�.. FT w i t oe T. [' -.-. �/ ♦ -� ze I 1 �ccJ c. iT CI T Y OF rFE,M: RfiNCHO CUCA'MT OIN' 'GA TRU: d0k w it PLANNESC DIVUaN EXHIBIT A SCALE: r.;.... I' �f NORTH 4ef. -y E, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAJONGA PLANNING DIVISION pp-Alools, .q 6 1 Mil ITEAI:_ 'rrju: KzA- Vlzp EXHIBIT: A-1 SCAL.E-.� CITY OF _ RA!\'CHO CUCAMONGA FL.AIVNliVG DINrNON PW7 PA-all EXHIBIT'= _ P-v-- 2- SCALE-- c� NOR 7H ��.1�100 DN .CCF-:)iZ / Q- MY OF RANCHO Ci. CANIO\G-k PL ALNq,`etl'-,G MrMN 1A' ^{�V} Nte a H _ZT7 rrl=z� T% rnr� r� rt �U ��/liUli`t�.1' DPQA° �F ff Nam c� �vJ CITY OF RAINCHO CUCAMONGA PLANN'LNG DRISION I M: EXHIBIT: - SCALE: Em Wr Y�1� 4�rrO�1� - NORTH �Yi w C •- Le MINUTES SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY PLANNING COT24ISSION Proposal: Location: Applicant: Proposal: Location: Applicant: Proposal: Location: Applicant: Julv 22, 1976 1tom 33. a. Tentative Tract No. 93.50, consisting of 24 lots on 14+ acres. b. Tentative Tract No. 9351, consisting of 63 lots on 37+ acres. Southwest corner of Banyan Street and Sapphire Street, Alta Loma. Mari: ICI /Associated Engineers Item 34. Tentative Tract No. 9369, consisting of 24 lots on 17+ acres. Northeast corner of "Tictoria and Archibald Avenue, Alta Loma Bob Jensen /Associated Engineers Item 35. Tentative Tract No. 9380, consisting of 18 lots on 10+ acres. South side of Marzanita Drive, approximately 660 feet west of Beryl Street, Alta Loma. Kenneth C. Elmore /Associated Engineers Staff makes presentation, reporting to the Commission that the tracts and their conditions have been discussed with all developers (Items 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 32, 33, 34, and 35) and developers have concurred with all conditions; the tracts meet area concerns of the general plan. Commissioner Sharp moves to APPROVE Tentative Tracts 9404, 9371, 9265, 9398, 9399, 9400, 9378, 9379, 9350, 9369, 9380 and Minor Subdivision, Index No. 76- 0161 -X, as presented in Items 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 32, 33, 34 and 35 above, accepting findings included in t::e written staff reports and subject to conditions as prepared by staff and agreed to by the developers. Commissioner Titus seconds; motion CARRIES unopposed. E 'ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT- AGENCY WNNING DEPARTMENT. 316 Mt View Avenue • San 8emardino, CA 92415 • (714) 383 -1417 July 23, 1976 SAN BERIQF>RDINO CO'JIdTY PLANNING COMMISSTS:7 SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENTS TRACT NO. 9351 (Altz- Lomai DEVELOPER: mark III Homes 202 Fashion Lane, Suite 102 Tustin, CA 92680 County of Son Berncrdino K"noth G TOPP" Piaming Qiteci - EXPIRATION DATE:•Jan. 22, 1978 ENGINEER: Associated Engineers 316 East "Et' Street Ontario, C& 91764 This will advise ynu that after completion of the environmental review process, and due consideration thereof, Tentative Tract 521a,�ni8 acres, containing 63 lots, was conditionally approved by Commission at its meeting of July 22, 1976 Said Tentative Tract was found to be in compliance with Section 66474 of the Subdivision %t-ap Act and was approved subject to the conditions as set forth on attached ages 2 of 6 through 6 oY 6. ENVIRON- IrNTAL IMPROVEMENT AGENCY PLANNING D=' A- RTMENi TOr y H7 ZTE'pHENS Design Review Section_ THS:mes cc: County Dept. of Transportation .County Flood Control District County Surveyor . County Environmental Health Services Conaty Division of Building St Safety County :irewarden County Sheriff El State Division. of Real Estate 107 S. Broadway, Rolm 8003 Los l 7 °'es, CA 90012 „nv:ISM:,`T �i�CtMr'-]'+2 l �::Lti• 3 e re n! � c ^w•�a fti• - ! ]. .`AtKcSail S. _ :d-., .. ...... F:l:n Dytrc: TRACT NO. 9351 (Alta Lcr) 1 STANDARD RE Q; I°_= MENTS : C Page 2 of 6 2 3 The water system and fire hydrants shall be installed in accordance 4 with the requirements of the State Health and Safety Code, and in 5 accordance with plans approved by the San Bernardino County I3ealth 6 Department and the governing fire protection authority. 7 8 Easements and improvements shall be provided and drainage coordin- 9 ated in accordance with plans approved by the San Bernardino County to health Department and the governing fire protection authority. 11 12 Where a bond is to be posted in lieu of installation of the in :rcve- 13 ment: 14 15 The domestic water plan and /or se:•:er plan shall be reviewed 16 by a. civil engineer, registered in the State of California, 17 and said engineer shall determine the amount of bend necessary 18 to install the improvements. This amount plus ten percent 19 shall be posted with the County of San Bernardino. 20 21 The presently required certificates on water maps for the 22 water companv and engineer must still be placed on the map. 23 in addition a statement shall be transmitted to the Pzblic 24 Health Department signed by the registered civil engineer 25 for the water purveyor stating that the amount of bond 26 recommended is adequate to cover the cost of installation. 27 of the improvement. 28 29 Further, prior to release of the bond :or the improvement, 30 the Cucamonga County Water District shall submit a signed 31 statement confirming that the improvement has been installed 32 according to the approved plans and meets the require -ent. 33 of all appropriate State and County laws pertaining to su:h 34 improvcmert. 35 36 In cases where the water agency or sewering agency is a 37 governmental subdivision, prior to final recording of the 38 tract map, the governmental agency shall submit a statement 39 directed to the County stating that the improvement has 40 been installed according to the approved plans or stating 41 that bond in the amount of 110 percent of the cost of in- 42 stallation of the improvement has been placed with the agency. Al 44 Street lighting shall be provided throughout the tract indlucing 45 all peripheral streets. 46 47 Utility lines shall be placed underground in accordance with the 48 requirements of County Ordinance No. 2041. 49 50* STREET, GRADING AND DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS: 57 52County Road Department: 53 S4 Road sections within the tract are to be designed and =5 ed. constructed to Valley Standards except sidewalks are delet =6 %4.17o.0+e+ r1 UJ 13 V V L N Y 1 -• V Tract No. 5351 (Al (;Loma) C Page 3 0£ 6 Anv grzdinc- wit ill the road. right of way prior to the signing o£ the improvement plans must be accomplished =der the 3 direction of a Soil Testing Engineer. Compaction tests of 4 embankment rons:zuction, trench backfili, and all subgrades 5 shz.11 be performed at no cost to San Bernardinc County and a 6 r ;tten report is to be submitted to the Contracts Divisi w on 7 prior to any place:uent of base materials and /or paving. 8 9 Final plans and profiles shall show the location of any 10 existing utility facility that would af5 --ct construction_. 11 a a _ 12 Slope rights are to be dedica,.` on the final tract map 13 where necessary. 14 S5 A thorough evaluation of the structural road section, to 16 include parkway i rrovements, from a qualified materials 17 engineer will be required. 19 A copy of the grading :lan shall be submitted to the Road 20 Department. 21 rea 22 A standard block wall will be required along t..e r o� 23 Lots or_ Sapphire Street. 24 hire Street as 25 Vehicular access rights are to be dedicated on Sapp 2 necessary. 2 Any existing County road which will require reconstruction 29 shall remain open for traffic at all tiries, with adequate 30 detours, during actual construction. A cash deposit shall 31 be required to cover the cost of grading and paving prior 32 be o£ the tract maP- Upon completion of the grading 33 and paving, to the sztisfaction of the Road Department, the cash-deposit may be refunded. 35 36 All existing easements lying within the future right of way cr's 37 are to be quit - claimed or delineated, as per County 38 requirements, prior to recordation of the tract map - 3e 40 An adequate drainage easement will be required with adequate 41 improvements, as determined by the Road Department and the 42 Flood Control District, together wit:n the necessary offsite 43 easements to convey drainage from this tract to the natural , offsite the tract boundary. ry. 44 drainage swale existin 45 46 Adequate facilities are to be constructed wherever the roe 47 section crosses any channel improvement or wash area - 48 49 Flowage easements or San Bernardino County drainage easements 50 will be required where diversion of runoff from the tract 51 dewaters onto private property. 0 34 r5 CJ Tract No. 9351 (Air Loma) f C Page 4 of 1 All road names shall be coordinated with the County Transportation 2 Department Traffic Division. 3 4 Trees, irrigation systems. landscaping required to be installed 5 on public ritht of way within this tract area shall be 6 maintained by others than County Transportation Department, 7 and evidence of such arrangement of such maintenance with 8 the appropriate County Service Area shall be presented prior 9 to acceptance of these roads into the County Maintained Road 10 System. 11 12County Division of Building and Safety: 13 14 A preliminary soil report, complying with the provisions of 15 ordinance 1928 shall be filed with and approved by the 16 Director of Building and Safety prior to recordation of the 17 final map. 18 19 Grading plans to be submitted to and approved by the Building 20 and Safety Department. 21 22 Obtain a demoliton permit for buildings to be demolished. 23 underground structures must be broken -in, backfilled, and 24 inspected before covering. 25 26 Submit plans and obtain building permits for walls required. 27 28Courty Flood Control District: 29 30 �yLots 15 through 23 be excluded from development until such time 31 as permanent channel improvements and debris retention facilities 32 are provided for Cucamonga Creek. Those lots shall be labeled 33 "Subject to Infrequent Flood Hazards From Cucamonga Creek" on the 34 final map. Lots 15 and 23 shall be reevaluated at the improvement 35 plan review stage and the requirement that those lots be excluded 36 from development will be reviewed again at that time. 37 38 Sapphire Street shall be designed as a water - carrying street and 39 its water- carrying capacity maintained. 40 41 .I'Those lots adjacent to Sapphire Street shall be elevated 1 1/2 42 Meet above the top of curb or a concrete block wall provided to 43 preclude Sapphire Street flows entering onto the lots. 44 45 ;(Low concrete block walls shall be provided along the northeast 46 return of Lots 35 and 63 and at the northeast corner of Lot 1 to 47 preclude Sapphire Street flows entering onto those lots. 48 El E 49 Adequate street rolls on the access streets at Sapphire Street shall 50 be provided to preclude Sapphire Street flows entering onto the tract. 51 52 Adequate provisions shall be made for handling onsite drainage floras 53 and dewatering the tract in a manner which will not adversely affect 54 downstream property. 55 56 t4- 120{0J61 Tract No. 9351 (AI C Loma) P460L; 9�6 6 1 Lots 24, 49, 50, 51, and 52 shall be elevated a minimum of 1 -foot 2 above the top of curb to preclude possible sheet overflow from 3 Cuca.-nonga Creek entering or-to the lots. 4 5 All lots shall be graded to drain to streets. if lots are not graded 6 to streets, it is ass=.ed the cross -lot drainage will be reviewed by 7 Bui?ding and Safety Department, and provisions for handling same made 8 under the various ordinances involved, 9 10 A permit from the Flood Control District will be required for any 11 encroacY.-aents onto the District's rights -of -ways. '2 13 *-In additior, to the Street and Drainage requirements, other 14 "on-site" or "off- site" improvements may be required which 15 cannot be determined from tentative plans and would have to 16 be determined after more complete improvement plans and 17 Fro files have been submitted to the County Road Department. 18 19 County surveyor: 20 21 Non - vehicular access dedication required due to double frontage lots 22 36 through 38. 23 24 Reference of adjacent streets, subdivisions, etc. to be 25 shown on final tract man., 26 2® Proper orientation required on final map per County Suzveyor's 28" Standards. 29 30 Submit preliminary boundary plat for checking prior to final 31 map. 32 33 Control boundary monuments shall be set and are subject. to 34 inspection prior to recordation of final nap. 35 36 FIATER SUPPLY PM SEWAGE DF_SPQSAL: 37 38 39 40 41 42 The water purveyor shall be Cucamonga County Water District. 43 44 Sewage disposal shall be by connection to Cucamonga County Water 45 District Sewers. 46 47 Any abandoned wells on the property or similar structures 48 that might result in contamination of underground waters 49 shall be destroyed in a manner approved by the Department of 50 Environmental Health Services. 51 EN£RAL REQUIRa ENTS AND ZaNING: S4 Existing and proposed zoning is R -1- 10,000 -T, R- 1- 12,000-T aad 55 R -1- 20,000 -T. 56 I The following °T" Standards shall be met cn this site: foot minia'arn. average Width and 30 Loot average 0 foot minimum average width and 35 foot average foot minimum average width and 40 foot average 12 In addition, lots on a cul -de -sac or a curved street which have side 13 lot lines which diverge from front :o rear shall have a width of not 14 less than 60 feet measured at the 1r1_iiding setback line. 15 16 Any existing eucalyptus trees to be retained shall be topped to 30 17 feet, trimmed along the lower 15 feet and cleared of all dead leaves 18 and branches. 19 20 _ Eauestrian easements shall be del i,- neated on the final tract map in 21-�_ the locations shown on the approved tentative tract map. 22 23 Two (2) copies of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions con - 24 cerning maintenance of the equestrian, easements shall be submitted 25 for the review and approval of the Planning Director. 26 27 Ademaate screening shall be provided where lots 1 and 2 (Tract 9350) 28 abut the Banyan Heights Water Company property. The type of screenin4b 29 shall be subject to the approval of the County Planning Director. 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 The wall required by the County Transportation Department_ along the 38 rear of all double frontage lots shall be designed and constructed 39 to incorporate design features such as tree piante.- wells, split 40 " block face, colurms, or other such features to provide visual and 41 physical relief along the wail face. Prior to recordation of the 42 final map, the developer shall obtain Planning Director Approval of 43 the type and design of wail to be built - 44 45 A minimu.-i number of 46 the parkway for each 47 48 a) Cul -de -sac lot - 49 fifteen (15) gallon trees shall be planted in of the following types of lots: one fifteen (15) gallon tree or greater- 50 b) Interior lot - two fifteen (15) gallon trees or greater - 51 52 c) Corner lot - three fifteen (15) gallon trees or greater - 53 54 The variety of tree to be provided is subject to County approval. 55 56 442QCZJ 51 l 2 3 i. zi -i -10. 00 -T: 80 4 setback. 5 6 2. R -1- 12,000 -T: 90 7 setback. 8 9 3. R -1- 20,000 -T: 100 10 setback. 11 foot minia'arn. average Width and 30 Loot average 0 foot minimum average width and 35 foot average foot minimum average width and 40 foot average 12 In addition, lots on a cul -de -sac or a curved street which have side 13 lot lines which diverge from front :o rear shall have a width of not 14 less than 60 feet measured at the 1r1_iiding setback line. 15 16 Any existing eucalyptus trees to be retained shall be topped to 30 17 feet, trimmed along the lower 15 feet and cleared of all dead leaves 18 and branches. 19 20 _ Eauestrian easements shall be del i,- neated on the final tract map in 21-�_ the locations shown on the approved tentative tract map. 22 23 Two (2) copies of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions con - 24 cerning maintenance of the equestrian, easements shall be submitted 25 for the review and approval of the Planning Director. 26 27 Ademaate screening shall be provided where lots 1 and 2 (Tract 9350) 28 abut the Banyan Heights Water Company property. The type of screenin4b 29 shall be subject to the approval of the County Planning Director. 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 The wall required by the County Transportation Department_ along the 38 rear of all double frontage lots shall be designed and constructed 39 to incorporate design features such as tree piante.- wells, split 40 " block face, colurms, or other such features to provide visual and 41 physical relief along the wail face. Prior to recordation of the 42 final map, the developer shall obtain Planning Director Approval of 43 the type and design of wail to be built - 44 45 A minimu.-i number of 46 the parkway for each 47 48 a) Cul -de -sac lot - 49 fifteen (15) gallon trees shall be planted in of the following types of lots: one fifteen (15) gallon tree or greater- 50 b) Interior lot - two fifteen (15) gallon trees or greater - 51 52 c) Corner lot - three fifteen (15) gallon trees or greater - 53 54 The variety of tree to be provided is subject to County approval. 55 56 442QCZJ 51 r ® A RESOLUTION OF THE APPROVING THE DESIGN 9351, LOCATED SOUTH STREET RESOLUTION NO. * RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION OF 42 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES FOR TRACT OF BANYAN STREET, WEST OF SAPPHIRE WHEREAS, on the Igth day of July, 1983, a complete application was filed by Lewis Development, ?pplicant for the above - described project; and WHEREAS, the Design Review corL^ittee has recommended aoprovai of said project, with appropriate conditions. WHEREAS, the project point rating exceeds the minimum threshold as required by the Growth Management Ordinance. SECTION 1: FINDINGS: 1. The design and layout of the proposed development will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or °uture developments, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. 2. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the character of the surrounding area and will create a harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated in the General Plan of the City. 3. The design of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture and color that will remain aesthetically appealing and will retain a reasonably adequate level of maintenance. 4. Th.t the proposed development, togeiher with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, )r materially injurious to properties or improvements •n the vicinity. 5. That the proposed development will comply with each of the applicable previsions of the Zoning Ordinance. SECTION 2: CONDITIONS OF, APPROVAL: The Design Review for Tract 0351 is approve subject to the1 owing conditions and attached standard conditions: 1. Unit setbacks shall be staggered t 5 feet. A minimum 30' setback shall be maintair:ed. Resolution No. Page 2 2. Side and rear elevations (occurring on corner parcels), seen from public view shall include additional architectural details, and wood siding. Such details shall be shown in final building plans. 3. The Developer shall comply with all conditions of approval for Tract 5351. 4. Substantial landscaping (trees, shrubs, groundcover, truf, i—. igaticn, etc.) shall be required along Sapphire Street. Vines shall be planted adjacent to retaining walls, and standard block wails. 5. Additional street trees shall be required along interior streets. An average of one tree per 30 feet shall be required. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY Or AJGUST, 1983. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 6Y Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Secret ary o t,e Planning onm:ssion I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of ;he Planning Commission held on the 24th day of August, 1983, 5y the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Ll 0 O Y 0 O r r r 6 O U 0 0 W O C N it li 3s • ^a J 6 O O u V �r T q a ^� 9_ �' d� ¢ y ✓ T T C T V C C N✓ O C �. y o_ q 4 O d «C O 73 N C q q p� C C°a LV " 9 aN �,?< VqJ C• E. q'JCC C N qr6 =A �3 a9 w N9C L' Jai TuG 6r u a 00 6� _ a^ i N °a_q d = d LL ✓ r C �^ E9✓9� A� rjr VMd'9 d _ N V Z ¢ �q� ¢ C qP� ✓ T .GaV J MC�j C V V A a 7 r •Vi .rJi C Y d 0 « fJ r _1 J u - q C _ 7. J g G ✓ N .dn V a` 9 g C N T d d O V ^ y. C a N H:J= N a O« V cod Nc�. nc _d^ a T�dp0 q N 'TOaA u C .Lr.A L O'O w^ VI �O p ^PO P O J O � l� 0 p �> O V V __ q C« O C C� r C ✓> O CV r✓ q p q O N' = O a q r W C F J 6 - q y q O q W • V S d C C� N d O✓ u e N ."� ✓ T C L V qN st d O CEO -j-2 D a O d N d C 4 d ' C � _ t� P L> L pO_V P LL NC•_ 6'L L7V `J ^ y•• > y CCUG�L�`4 ^9 C ^ ✓ L> ^ ✓q C O _ Y r pL L L 91Y q� C C � � t^ r N P� d a N �^ ✓. .ri. j a� N C •L V g nq�o cWq _ Q m NPL JO ..V O p�N J 6C 6 . C'J 6 �ryry J r y J _ O �� : S G� V L � ; g Td✓ GrN� rN ^Wr y 1�d � T' PO rCC�. HN >E `O • °p �Y✓°•� °spa LOS v a w .�Na � C. L O �= uc N c�J ��o cw .L. 6V� CA6Lp 6N6a Gq�m CL} F"O.N ti � .n • ... wNi Y 0 O r r r 6 O U 0 0 W O C N it li 3s • ^a J 6 O O u V �r T q C N N _ T a V O V 6 c .• . N C V• c r o d �. y o_ 4 O d «C O 73 N C q q p� C C°a LV " ¢ �q� ¢ C qP� V9C .GaV Wal MC�j - N O P •¢P H:J= N O« V cod Nc�. nc _d^ ra `.+ O C O VI > b 0 L L O d«F pG O Oa_ q.Li.l PNEN YV.Od S st RS O •NI , n� = J N Q m o rV O N W V ✓ �» y v � C 9 N °No c�- o _ n ✓ N.°! o s � "09 d P'm:N c N e m coc^ 9 r O C O a F c� _ _ o 6A O a u_ o. 0 0 _ v TV 6� G ° ✓ q w r T� a N O L jN "E.`To° °ANT. iy^ u u-[N y uA P N L L w•OCMr °>. '°= � ° p° � 9L+ad ° •�i�m oC L �".✓. �o Lb aM� a ^.c v! .f^'NE _ .Cis m c my eNgsb✓ v oqN vOEE c � � � o � O 6 a'` _9 °n p J N d O d o A > q` ✓ Q q ` W 'r u G�N✓O ✓TCW n S 6✓ N ymlm_L` d a L N ' 6 V✓A�ON 6.up � b � O ' LVR��� e. ✓�A V Ca dam°' q v. _U ✓u._ ...N ld�b .0 NAL EI O��d Qq _^. `2 ° °A�9� EV �_ iJ 7 P6� p Ed - •09 r N q a 2 6 F E -Am Vm9 -M` ✓ C�`C ✓�.E+aOV T d= � TO 'J 'z p ^LY � nV D, iL`.N ✓ J o e Tum��cm c a T c c,°„' q E V��dLG G✓ � - Q ~ O P n o V O y VE ° p m 6 F O N L J^ C M we-C V- V° N 9 mE 9 � ✓ q U L F> t v L A= d 9 CC m'nNfT 2 c c �_ n' y^ bc� t ° v n ✓— mac C P p✓ C E U ✓ > n O p 9 q` a�✓ ., M A C 9 C � .^ 7 ✓` U c c V ° m O L H V r o" __ F T A O W O` V 60 ✓ A 2 N i O OOC�CM °a.^�• a y0M0 -�C V A ✓NV_ L ✓p6PU E. _ y✓°, Q O M✓ P _ 90 V N 9✓ NL00 p A V✓ y✓✓ .U. N =` C q� ? t 9 a M C 9` �✓ d O C A � P� o L ✓E °y°,A - yC�q d t. T L q L� O. ✓b �to Nom° �N� vcaN c °✓ 2 M 9 N L✓ T c n L c a 9 v mA ✓. qu mc° N nz cN s c Nd `c b�^ O °1 .^ z ° zT d 9 N O S O C N OL N A E ACi dj a O V �NN NLt9y _2 a yJ i Z �� 4 V N a y ._ N✓ aj N N t! N ✓. V^ T A E y ADO= � P^ L ✓ d NI A C t0✓ �l'fC ��° � A� »V Tad" Wiw P9l Oa.". -QVi�C G✓�w �r bti �I 9 L � V� ✓� N�� L 'JL V >m o Au _�cN^ ✓ s°A TI ✓ ���✓ _ c 4�E cm °ov °v � —z d —_9 ° =_ o N 6N O_J L- JO>r�N O QVN 6C� 6 6Q `9 p( CVI y�adin�92NL A2 YN L N YI W O o rV O N W V ✓ �» y v � C 9 N °No c�- o _ n ✓ N.°! o s � "09 d P'm:N c N e m coc^ 9 r O C O a F c� _ _ o 6A O a u_ o. 0 0 _ v TV 6� G ° ✓ q w r T� a N O O a 0 •J . u �o � 6 N � o= o � . m V _ d ° U' 4 N O 4� Oi\ uLI u L ✓ L jN "E.`To° °ANT. iy^ u u-[N y uA P N L L w•OCMr °>. °w °a 9L+ad 4 •�i�m c �_L„ qS s � m c my eNgsb✓ v oqN vOEE c � � � o � m �� C4 a'` _9 °n � q N N E✓ J N d O ✓9. ° V r E W_a CJ G�N✓O ✓TCW S w 'q` N ymlm_L` d a L ✓ v A9 O y ✓ N C r , ✓ �V.Vn q0 L~ c_ N N K °� JiJ O��L n�r0�6 T O p C� � b ✓La ✓�N ° V SL N q a 2 6 F O a 0 •J . u �o � 6 N � o= o � . m V _ d ° U' 4 N O 4� Oi\ uLI u L ✓ L jN "E.`To° °ANT. iy^ u u-[N w•OCMr °>. E N c 9L+ad •�i�m ✓9"m •� ou N d O l� P✓ n= TL n y E a C✓ N ymlm_L` d a .1' m C v N 9 S ✓ N C r ✓ K °� v C 2 = T O p C� � b ✓La ✓�N ° V SL N q a 2 C�CO E -Am Vm9 -M` ✓ C�`C 'z z ✓_o° c_ c c a N u N ✓ J o e Tum��cm c a T c c,°„' q E V��dLG G✓ � - NEN A`' O P n o V O y VE ° p m 6 F O N T C9 � N N qC N` N 9 mE 9 � N CC m'nNfT 2 c c �_ n' y^ bc� t ° v n ✓— mac ` ✓ b 7✓ m M P q` 'L C L q 9 S� m L N c c c c W O: A m - r o" __ � L .on— a U Lr U ryry .".a N MTN} OOC�CM °a.^�• a y0M0 -�C E. _ V Q q <_ Q O M✓ P _ p A V✓ Cn O N •O ✓V uq P� yC�q 2 M 9 N L✓ T C C`- ^ O O C 6 E� 6 �� n0 L 6 6 °- N 4� 9 a T \1 [I A W cyo c i M � OGgO G V d� � 6 C -- L ' P ' Li y ar U 'L• �.Ln m'J C .0.. y � C H -� • O �"'L �° i � Cy y�C N �'u �ji O od sM SF _ L. OrJ ma W J CJ r t N✓ 9 - q p�q �1. •--a q � 6.L �q G rC r 2 1. -Tr Ja ^ •' ° r •' 1- � e L •�' v � � c_ � � .. N V C m? T,r V 1 c6C O O C ~_ Or_ .Onq v u- O r?gOd r>i N_i qi E�.r. OO maa2T agiu ow,0 N EOM Ty � py� u4 .�.o� aC �� �'y^ GO.V< NCO u� OGI eO � 61L VO NOU_�q -' 00 it U�Ep 6 G.ui. J9r LC O1 i GG UI �jgY ¢PEA -_CTpOL � 9 C 4< Ow < C ¢ E'10 i ri� C -C� EI L>WO �G d �63r aL <o•m o-dr q C yI N� �� ^I N� \Nt `�� NI C� � HI <1 O�•r m.rut PL d.Ll Ct 01d °. r-L 9r y m V]..1 `� t �• c m O y t O. V O = C q u � O r r y Y V •" y q O. a n C y O T G M Y y O y y C ° N _O V N N� v K - t N O E L L q O O . O •� qmy� C � q VPVO M� DO - ry ^00 q q .yi.�U C C L r m p r r G y r✓Oi Y C.�y q �t E" - r - y �q m 2 q V p S • C O Q O 7 N i q C r EZ C V m N �°. r` 0 L Y q »4Gp r y rO r= C E q Tug Cyr NV � = �y9 CFN O Llut^» 9.J SL' rib O LeO. mmC QO .'qr Pql CO GC e GYO °�V �pVi �•ju r Ce ��O L JLV u pp r P qur N •'.•_NOm q ICJ V- CS OO 4'C Eir PJf L C m Y LN.�r V O_ v U N O� r O J d V Y �• L �C�r qty, i C j �_ �70 r C Gyr LN N• T �a CC - O.r �• V C r q u C q m e C r t C 6 _ �[ M C 7- 2 O O L V y m E o'T.• Gve .r =.rin igq.N.E 6E � ~oc �N cy u� ./. sN Po° _ i�� HI Op tr0 O yt..l s V -J >LCV of q dm � q9 -'LSO cor � c Lq V r �pp Pr No nz ¢ pL' °° Ls a ` M eq`` upy rT qrq q qa qy O �dG N � 9 _w pQ0 qC LL lL Uq0 .Vr.t� d_PC L� gOT9 V Gmm _N 'C JOm GT i^ ? Jim d6 V. wYO. -a> T�T .tr.0 r O ReJe C iO 0O ^p Ny aaGi 9 y Ocp? � gacm qi:5 64 » u r E � NrNgN <pr !-� QN T✓16'm <q -c-eo. <V »L.py rNj NNi yNY <- JLEC E Ll Ll L. Y I O O O. L C O T 3 O L P O 0 9 E a N L C N =P C A S V O O w N! C C C O O °AC Ac e e o as° Id 00°1 � a `oao� o ' Not + 2 � ✓ c y 9 YY L V O � V ✓ Y > V 00 P � V q dV lY .r..0 NU.—.r C CY�L✓ 2• G O O q L W q A Y '" V° O_✓ y P O � • � V V 6 Z v _ L PL. q3. L'.. � I C V N y _ A Y O � ✓ A V1J ' P OWN ' d II ff V G FS 1 d r Nov s: cQd ya -- rT✓ __ V V N 3 1 a L V N e— N Ot9 O Q 6 V� V 1 tl6 V O O5 'JV ✓ V O 6 .� ° J O W E N�� 9 C A• V •L" Y b J V 6 L � Y ° A L = Q •' a . V � V P N q P V T i � C C O L {1 �y9 O-N L C O T 3 O L P O 0 9 E a N L C N =P C A S V O O w N! C C C O O °AC Ac e e o G N ^ O J w _V L V � O _ e o✓ o B C E C V O r oQu J 66 p C C V N q O y Y d ? 9 L Y N O N 4 L C o V A r > C V e O T i c a NVL iP �yI V .•� L V Ei L �✓L..n Y PN_O COO —_ • ^1 d c 0 O u N G G a •o v P a e i L A N C T y Z 6 O r V C V � D y N V V Q 2 Y -• Z M Sr u M R M n� c A C Y f O G L TE C � p o r N V N �c P 30 C V = a N „ V G Op T S= Y✓ CY �✓ �_ CS QL Vim• N R'� ! i M 7 S 0 N O o y b2A C N r y N .°. O i V C' i V 9 J^ O A L �N C C A .v I L'1 C as° � -� -•�+ 00°1 � a `oao� b Not + ai ✓ c y 9 YY L V V V ✓ Y > V 00 P � V q dV lY .r..0 NU.—.r C CY�L✓ 2• G O O q L W q A Y '" V° O_✓ y P O � • � V V 6 Z v _ L PL. q3. L'.. � I C V N y _ A Y O � ✓ A P OWN d V G FS 1 d r Nov s: cQd ya -- rT✓ __ V V a L V N e— N Ot9 O t O V� V 1 d. V O O5 'JV ✓ V O 6 .� ° J O W E N�� 9 C A• V •L" Y b J V 6 L � Y ° A L = Q •' a . V � V P N q P V T i � C C O L V �y9 O-N NVLI 4 �N PAd Y= v _ w NW NO p PG �t.� AS r .•V =Z=VO � V y C A Y � L J V ✓ L C L. V. �. T A .N. Z ✓ YL Td LL = _ Y N c c J v `✓ i - ✓O.V-5 � C LVC OG> >L Cb � Z N 9 L Qu n O.0 E G O r �� C c r� V C. ✓ O c t V 0 V A � V p — L V V N V^ O V P ✓ V P 9 9 P p 21y y O• �� j� L C C— = V i C C ✓ >w >. TV r YW Yq SW ♦0 Y V q �AY a1GPr0_ 4 ✓O _ — V- V K9L O L u ;O 6 O .V.rN ECyN 9 6` a ¢✓ 6 V 6 V •L+ 6 A 6 P L W i V C fl NI bI N! ml pl v r o m ° G N ^ O J w _V L V � O _ e o✓ o B C E C V O r oQu J 66 p C C V N q O y Y d ? 9 L Y N O N 4 L C o V A r > C V e O T i c a NVL iP �yI V .•� L V Ei L �✓L..n Y PN_O COO —_ • ^1 d c 0 O u N G G a •o v P a e i L A N C T y Z 6 O r V C V � D y N V V Q 2 Y -• Z M Sr u M R M n� c A C Y f O G L TE C � p o r N V N �c P 30 C V = a N „ V G Op T S= Y✓ CY �✓ �_ CS QL Vim• N R'� ! i M 7 S 0 N O o y b2A C N r y N .°. O i V C' i V 9 J^ O A L �N C C A .v I L'1 C b Not + ai ✓ c y 9 YY L V V V ✓ Y > V 00 P � V q L p 2• G O O q L W q as V yNa C O a Y _ V G FS 1 d V O. O � I✓ CGj TJO P� V V a L V N e— N Ot9 O t O V� V 1 V O O5 'JV O Vq6• —NO qO V •L" � 6 ` L •' a q P V T i � C C O V Y= T O a I YL Td LL = _ Y N c c J v `✓ i - 9 0 > oo c2 q V P ♦0 LN LO 1 V �q0. — ✓ K9L L u ;O 6 O .V.rN ECyN 6` a ¢✓ 6 V 6 V •L+ 6 A 6 P L W i V C Q A v r o m ° G N ^ O J w _V L V � O _ e o✓ o B C E C V O r oQu J 66 p C C V N q O y Y d ? 9 L Y N O N 4 L C o V A r > C V e O T i c a NVL iP �yI V .•� L V Ei L �✓L..n Y PN_O COO —_ • ^1 d c 0 O u N G G a •o v P a e i L A N C T y Z 6 O r V C V � D y N V V Q 2 Y -• Z M Sr u M R M n� c A C Y f O G L TE C � p o r N V N �c P 30 C V = a N „ V G Op T S= Y✓ CY �✓ �_ CS QL Vim• N R'� ! i M 7 S 0 N O o y b2A C N r y N .°. O i V C' i V 9 J^ O A L �N C C A .v I L'1 C l' a O o C L U .. 9' .\ LO y ... � • � � 9 y -_ y O .U' O C .O+ L q v y p O 9 9 y G J° O� C y P y~ •Jn Rw ..r T P C T °- N O O ✓ L P D `NO ✓ C Lp C PV `' °'b ..rE Up^ LEY ZvN �d'uNP 9jV �= s+•ud O.r Wu ^ �` JO.� °• r y G L �^ r E V ^ l e i d? L O V a ^ � y d_ L 7 Cy gaJno L —cE acCL OpF cL^✓s9 N -y J °.L T�^O •ice ✓.-C _ 9r C rV�V ✓ 2 c r O ^ C V \. r qL✓ -�` O ^x �y oCC NG`9j LOC `'� 9 ° 9.' ✓ 9 � S C Z 9` N C i P` „ p° u •°+ 4 �. y 9 N 9 i 2� d 7; a 9 .• C 9 L O r 9 G 9 O d V -- Ev d^ uE p•`d .-. ot'V° �9y •L a;0 G>°•a >a `r C 6✓ O� vU O u•q•` C O L✓` �= T w yE� r C V 6U D✓ a^ ✓ �^ L Od V VV N wV ^ .... V w9 L N O O �' O� d^ C O L �"• ya`O` iE ON�n a D c ..✓L Gan✓ a+4 TDV � �V L_ OJ Gr F. y0° �O �dO V� V N N pN aJi• .-.O q^ V9O P 6 q`L ^CVS G T L a y^y � ✓ ^ d L�DV -s � 9 U a° A L � C 6' ^ ✓ a' ^• � v 9 POD � �. p D C N Q E L c P G M= C � N o L q °• i V Pd S� ✓ �V�T t2-7 V✓ =r i0 Ci J V NC °•✓ y ^p `pE: U � � Nr -Ja >7 N9�� NN �.°.. L 00 00J[ QNC Gd9> ONT9O T��N _ E Car ^q' q N N 6990 9 Sp�F ^L ly °aa <O� 0 P9 O' T yT NN °,OU L SCa NIt 9 c+ P OI e N 41 °� uI w J w d L 9 A� P9 V L V P 9 d L P P V P V ' t �L T•+ TJ�Q ^LJC� 9 rGL Nar V9 p � O� V J n i✓ C L N �✓ ✓ T K C b � �_ � � t Y •`u- rN. cs cfi v i� °� uyy aE. �G �w v° D t a` ✓ os ° v `qa+ zvLf.° L `c `� or LZ °dcyL c o �a V V m�LGaL.f as d• L E V u D v `. °J P v M V d Q e ° u a v r,. - W• o �� Tom'^ s ... °a✓n �'... o y �Y L J _ C e �J O LL V N O N ^ V d C N paV Z VV ✓c VG C9 ^r °aa` r CVJ G9 N FO mL NE 6 N__ L mo J a Goy °c r•' °Nc d � Qo i:� e� ` mG I DOV °G rJ r 6a?_r V ^ �� V9.Oi Vuu JO✓ QL c0✓�O 9•°iC� .Ji•Y97G L •.T LGLO NN�9j rE9= _ N 'N�V O 9q CV Oz rC� 9�UN NE CpyN � EM J NV � O^ q c C� VP 4G Gp �✓ •O"�a`N _ vjP � V Py� p� LOm m _P.°i VV Fir c) '^ ..`.� y...V 9 o Lr••� = .. y =° . P c 9 �� ^ 0 > 0 ✓ C^ GU G G2t .d. O� C r S � V 4 P T✓ V u 7 6 9 y `� O V A •n � G C � 9 O O_ 9 O�1 �VWL G q %NC 4Np 6'J -]'arN p ^9w0 N G VD y W VV �G O�G}f C� �� NI U C _ p•1r ZA l' 0 0 6 V ° q O c c � v W ` r V a� C T O t G V d a ^l t= L 9I d^ O G O qc qI r9 O N� y ✓ q P^ C T 1r T- 9 P � � A o— n i � L r ^ ^— TUrL O 9 O Lo_o .c pZ O— O O S L O O C ^ — 96e L ON= O. cmwc° 9 p N p G O N O G C p c t V Q U O —6C VA A d^ 0 GN L Z i V w £O p q a 2 d J C p A V C ^J N 9 O O N E L _ � a «a 361 a1c«e �� �° L4 od 2 J2u rDa 9l '� _ C •'• >• �� y L > S� V ° N O p � d o. a ^T'T ^p V ° q O c c � v W ` r V a� C T O t G V d a ^l t= L 9I d^ O G O qc qI r9 O N� y ✓ q P^ C T 1r 9 P � � i L r GJ ^— TUrL C 9 O L cmwc° U O —6C VA A d^ 0 GN L Z i V w £O L N _ � E�ri a J2u rDa 9l '� _ C •'• >• �� y L > S� V ° N O p � d a ^T'T ^p up« N1C`V _ N dA Vi _ °V W— ='- y°. dC� bC O.`q �Odp fv .O ^U r7 kO � °a •L•q pr.c l�q ° I =� qr �c WV LN LP, �' Iu 6i L C O � �•' p V° L C I O— V « � T ` � p _O r �I O t 11 A GxTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA S:CAFF REPORT DATE: August 24, 1983 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR 0EVLLUFMLN1 'ctvicw �Oa-E%L - BWLC - The deve lopmen t OT a 5, square foot industrial bui 'ng on 4.8 acres of lard in the General Industrial /Rail Served category (Subarea 5), located at 8977 Center Street - AP`i 209 - 242 -09 & 209 - 251 -09. 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. _Purpose: Construction of a 15,600 square foot industrial bui lding C. Location: Generally located at the southeast corner of 8th Street and Center Street, west of Haven Avenue D. Parcel Size: 4.8 acres E. Existing Zoning: industrial Area Specific Plan, General Industrial /Rail Served (Subarea 5) F. Existing Land Use: Excelion Corporation, granite milling operation G. Surrounding Land Use and Zon'in : ort► SF Railroad trac s, residential (North Town), zoned R -2 & C -1 So=:th - General industrial businesses, General Industrial /Rail Served (Subarea 5) East - General Industrial, vacant, General Industrial/Rail Served category (Subarea 5), Industrial Park category (Subarea 6) West - Vacant property, General Industrial /Rail Served category (Subarea 5) ITEM C uevelopment Keview tss [u /ts' Planning Commission Agenda August 24, 1983 Page 2 H. General Plan Desi nations: roject Site - General In3ustriai /Rail Served North - Medium Density Residential on north ide of railroad tracks South - General Industrial/Rail Served East - General Industrial /Rail Served, Industrial Park West - General Industrial /Rail Served I. Site Characteristics: Four buildings totaling approximately 9200 square feet and a 70-foot high crane exist on the property. The present granite cutting and milling operation has existed on the property For a number of years. In addition, a portion of the property is used for outdoor storage of granite. The natural slope of the property is approximately one and ore -half percent to the south. No significant vegetation exists or the subject property. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant and is attached for your review and consideration. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Assessment and found no significant impacts on the environment as a result of this project. S. Impacts: Development of the project will generate additional traffic to the site and increase the amount of water runoff to the parcel. However, thew increases are insignificant since the surrounding streets and drainage facilities will be provided to handle the projected increases. III. RECOMMENDATION: Based upon site analysis and the Initial Study, this project will not cause significant adverse impacts on the environment. If the Commission concurs, issuance of a Negative Declaration for this project would be in order. Res ct u-, submitted, R- Ick;Gomez Citv'planner RG:CJ:jr Atta.:Nrents: Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Initial "A1° - Location Map "B° - Site Plan "C� - Natural Features Map Study, Part I if %Y! 4ei , 5v it II f f ` EXISTING BUILDING AREA 9200 S.F. NEW BUILDING ARE;. 16800 S.F. TOTAL AREA 24800 S-FL PARKING PEOUIRED SO SPACES PARKING PROVIDED SL SPACES FUTURE OFFICES 7400 SF. Y L-1 i1 • K 21.. Zi iIS >...t...GM.G.M. A �'Y Y.� W9GCNG GC.fff 10 fal GIrfM IM. IfYf h C16M}M .T *ZZT M...rl....N.K.. a srNKN • -1 (XI .....1.If. ww (KI Y..Y.1... CITE' OF RANCHO CL ICAMOgTGA PLANNING DZVb9ONU. 131 C.fln'1M...M• ,IK...M ....ro i...l,..M.l ..N... O WE LJ 7 J�Ihll� °h1 -`� \ \ter •...- // ,1 II // fA I'll. t JIJ t L I � �l fl V NORTH CITY OF : RANCHO CUCNIMONGA T=: awa 4smssmw-* ,� PLANTNINC; DINUON EXHIBIT- jpcf SCALE, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Envirc.- "ner_tal Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee =hrough the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The - roject will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2; The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion_ concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITTLE: EacellOn AutO mtion APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE:B'r''kian -WOli3 -Lang- Christopher 9375 Archibald Avenue #101, Rancho Cucamnga, i NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Dale L949 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS MID ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) 8977 O`nter Street, Back 209, Page 242, pareT9 ayd Page 215, Parcel 9 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: �.,a M4nry Fnnthill Fire rdstrict. and I -1 E 11 0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: ACREAGE OF PROJ =CT AREA AND. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AN PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 4_R Acros Existing building ronosed 1526M SE DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGR:�PHY. PLANTS (TREES), ANi^1A,S, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OP. ENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURRC?UNDING PROPERTIES, AND ' -A£ DESCRIPTION EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR UvE (ATTACK NECESSARY S HE is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whop have significant environmental impact? No, there are no significant environeental, cult ual, or historical aspects of any consegmnce on the site. 1-2 WlLL THIS PR03ECT: I YES NO X 1. Create s substantial change in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial chance in existing noise or vibration? _g_ 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? _ X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Date h,,,_st�_Signature TitleArehitect, AIA 11 1-3 E l J u CITY OF RANCHfJ CUC "1ON A STAFF REPORT DATE: August 24, 1983 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Plarner BY: Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL DSt rtKrilI 01-VC ANDtR N - e eve opm�nt of a reta� center on I. acres of land in the C -1 zone to be located at the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Turner Avenue - APN 208 - 321 -32. BACKGROUND: The developer is requesting a time extension for CUP 81 -02, located at the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Turner Avenue (Exhibit "A"). The project consists of an 18,003 square foot commercial building to include a 100 seat restaurant and self- service car wash. In addition, a 3,000 square toot building pad will be constructed for future development. The project was originally approved for 18- months on February 25, 1981 and subsequently granted a 12 -month extension. The current expiration date is August 25, 1983. The developer is requesting a time extension due to the current economic climate that exists at this time and the feasibility of leasing the subject buildinss after construction. ANALYSIS: Two items of concern relative to this time extension are: (1) conformance with current development standards; and, (2) appropriate length of the time extension. A review of the site plan revealed that tho project does not conform to the landscape requirement for hrrow Route or Turner Avenue. Based upon o'-,r current standards, Arrow kuute, as a Special Boulevard, requires an average 45 -foot deep streetscape. The approved plan provides 25 feet. Turner Avenue is designated as a secondary street with a 35 -fnot streetscape requirement. The approved plan provides 20 feet. To comply with the streetscape requirements, the site plan would have to be revised substantially. Such a change would require review by the Design Review and Development Review Committees and approval by the Planning Commission. If the Commission determines that compliance with the streetscape standards is necessary, then this CUP should not be extended. Such action • vould deem the approved project invalid and the applicant would have to process a new site plan. Regarding the length of the time extensicn, the informal policy is to allow a four year approval, with the appropriate extensions. If the Commission choses to approve the applicant's request, they can grant any increment of extension up to eighteen (18) months. If thi full eighteen ITEM D Time Extension - CUP 81 -02 /Anderson Planning Commission Agenda August 24, 1983 Page 2 months is ;ranged, this would be the last extension that could be granted. if s shorter extension is granted, the Commission could indicate that this would be the last extension because of the landscape non - conformities. P.ECOMMENJATiON: it is recommended that the Planning romaission consider all input a.n material relative to this )ject. A Resolution of approval is provided should the Commission decide to grant the extension.. Respectfully submitted, Rick Gomei--" City Planner RG:CJ:jr 'Attachments: Exhibit "A " -- Fxhibit "S" - Exhibit "C" - Exhibit "D" - Exhibit "E" - Exhibit "F" - Exhibit "G" - Resolution of Time Extension Location Map Illustrative Site Plan. Detailed Site Plan Elevations Elevations Conceptual Grading Plan Letter from Developer Approval with Conditions Resolution of Approval CI LJ 11 'xaA T , Ll 1 Y Y • n Y J. 1 \ NORTH oil I I P I , OF NC MY • • PLANININ • • •. Ell 87i, x .!1 W.1 CITY OF R. '�C 0 CUCAXIO\Gh. PLANNING PiVEDN 11 U NORTH ITEM,_ 60? T ; E. rxHlBl - SCALE 11 0 ARNOLD D. ANDERSON /REALTOR 520 NORTH EUCLID AVENUE • ONTAMO, CALIFORNIA 91762 • (714) 986 -6735 I III i0�7 R►� rri q�8i9�iDell`l2 it �2�� 04 w:�� August 1, 1983 fly. Dan Coleman Planninv Department ;;ity of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, Californie 91730 RE_ RCP, Plaza - Arrow « Turner Dear Mr. Coleman; Tn,s letter is to request an extension of C.J.P. 81 -02 for a period or one year to eighteen months. This project is being held up due to the economic climate that exists at this time, and t!e feasibility of being able to lease the properties we propose to build. We respectfully request V is extension and thank you for your help. Enclosed please find mw check in the amount of $62.10. ADA /ds encl cc_ Richard Avent Yours truly, Aj* '441 RESOLUTION NO. 81 -27 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNIN6 COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 81 -02 FOR A RETAIL CENTER LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ARROW AND TURNER IN THE C -1 ZONE. WHEREAS, on the 9th day of January, 1981, a complete application was filed for review on the above described property; and WHEREAS, on the 25th day of February, 1981, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public bearing to consider the above - described project. NOW, THEP.EFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as foilows: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the site for the proposed development is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 2. That the proposed use will not have an adverse effect e abutting property and the permitted use thereof. 3. That this development will not be injurious to the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on February 25, 1981. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 81 -02 is apr:roved subject to the following conditions: Planning Division 1. Detailed drawings for the drive -thru restaurant, including elevations, colored elevations, and building material samples, shall be submitted, and reviewed and approved by th3 Design Review Committee prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. The restaurant pad shall be turfed and irrigated until such time as pad is developed. 3. Dense landscaping, including trees and s'--rubs, shall be provided as a buffer along the north and west property lines to the satisfaction of the City Planner. The planter size shall be 5' on the north and west planter. E r Resolution Ho. 81 -21 Page 2 AML 4. A minimum of 24 feat of free and clear access must be provided around tte rear portions of the retail building (car wash facilities are permitted within this aisle). 5. The bicvcle rack in Front of the retail building shall be relocated so as not to obst*uct pedestrian and handicap access to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 6. Pedestrian walkways shall be provided from the sidewalks on Arrow and Turner and on -site walkways or stamped concrete pathways shall be provided across paved surfaces to the satisfaction of the City Planner. stalls indicated on the detailed site i. 11 service "an shall be a minimum of 10 feet in width and striped as "Loading Zone Only ". S. The car wash area, including the drying spaces and the space between, shall be P.C.C. insteac of asphalt paving. 9. All surface runoff from the car wash shall be coliE:ted into catch basins and severed to the satisfaction of Cucamonga County Water District requirements. The grading and drain_3e plan shall be revised to indicate this. 10. Tt;e T & G wood fascia shall be continued around rear portion of retail building to enhance the north and west elevations. t,4 s 11. The City Planer shall review the !+east of operation of the Center one year from the date of occupancy to determine iWoether there have been complaints to warrant Planning Conaission review and establishment of hours of operation. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF RUARY, 1981 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY CF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 11 Resolution No. 81�j Dage 3 '� I, JACK LAN, Secretary of the Planning Com^nission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that'the foregoing Resolution was duty and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Co:mnission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Com*ission held on the 25th day of February, 1981 by the following vote to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Sceranka, Rempel, king, Tolstoy, Dahl NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None E a n-- DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS Subject: ,� G� _4A Applicant Location: Those items checked are conditions of approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE P1AhNINf DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE UITH THE FOLLOWING - CONDITIONS: A. Site Development 1, Site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plans on file in the Planning Division And the conditions contained herein. 2. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating al conditions of approval shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. _Z3 - Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Zoning Ordirance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at time of Build-..-.,j Permit issuance. 4. The developer shall provide all lots with adequate sideyard area for Recreation Vc?hicie storage pursuant to City standards. 5, Mail boxes, in areas where si'ewalks are required, shall be installed and located by the developer subject to approval by the Planning Division. 6. Trash rs= eptacle areas shall be enclosed by a 6 foot high masonry wall with view obstructing gates pursuant to City standards. Location shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division- s. If dwellings are to be constructed in an area designated by the Foothill Fire Districts as "hazardous ", the roof materials must be approved by the Fire Chief and Planning Division prior to issuanc_ of a building permit -. S. A sample of the roof material shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits_ g, All roof appurtenances, integrated, shielded frc and streets as required 10. Prior to any use of the thereon, all conditions the satisfaction of the including air conditioners, shall "be architectural:; im view and the sound buffered from adjacent ;roperties by the Planning and Building Divisions. project site or business activity being comrenced of approval contained herein shall be completed to Director of Community Development. Oak 11. A detailed lighting plan shall be submitted t^ and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. Such plan. shall indicate style, ;llumination,'location, height and method of shielding. No lighting shall adverse3 y affect adjacent properties. 12. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be solar heated.: 13. iexturized pedestrian pathways across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings with open spaces and recreational uses. 14. All trash pick up shall be for individual units with all recepticals kept out of public view from private and public streets. 15. Standard patio cover plans shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner and Building Official prior to occupancy of the first unit. 16. All buildings numbers and individual units shall be identified in a -- clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. 1;. Solid care exterior doors, security dead bolts and locks shill be installed on each unit in this project. _ 16. Security devices such as window locks shall be installed on each unit. 19. All units within this development shall be preplumbed to be adapted for a solar water heating unit. 20. Energy conserving building materials and.a�pliances are required to be incorporated into this project to include such things as but not limited to reduced consumption shower heads, better grade of insulation., double pared windows, extended overhangs, pilotless appliances„ etc. 21- This development shall provide an option to home buyers to purchase a solar water heating unit. 22. EmErgency secondary access shall be provided to this tract to the satisfaction of the Foothill Fire Protection District. 23- Local and Master Planned Equestrian Trails shall be provided throughout the tract in accordance with the Equestrian Trail Plan fer 4,ta Loma. A detailed equestrian trail plan indicating widths, maximL_n slopes, physical condition, fencing and weed control in accordance wit;i City equestrian ;,rail standards shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to approval and recordation of the firiai map. 24. This tract shall form or annex to a maintenance district for maintenance of equestrian trails. t 25. This project shall provide percent of affordable housing and /or rents, in conformance with General Plan housing policies and the housing criteria defined in the Growth Management Ordinance. Affordability shall be determined by current market rates., rents and median income levels at the time of construction of the prcjec'.. Proof of this provision shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to finalizing building per-.,its and occupancy of the units. A. • Parkina and Vehicular Access X41_ All parking lot landscaped islands shall have a minimum inside dimensior. of S' and shall contain a 12" walk adjacent to parking stall. i626_ Parking lot trees shall be a minimum 15 gallon size. Z3_ All two -way aisle widths shall be a minimum of 24 feet wide. _Z4_ Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a m:nimum of 24 feet wide at all times during construction in accordance with Foothill Fire District requirements. 5_ All parking spaces shall be double striped. 6. All units shall be pravided with automatic garage door openers. 7. Designated visitor parking areas shall be turf blor;ed. g_ The C.C. & R.'s shill restrict _.e storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principle source of t- anspo:'tztion for the owner. g. No parking shall be permuted within the interior cirulation aisle other than in designated visitor parkinq areas. C.C. & R.'s shall be developed by the applicant and submitted to the City Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. C. Landsrapin 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan s,iall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Existing trees shall be retained wherever possible. A master plan of existing trees showing their precise location, size and type shall be co;pleted by the developer. Said plan stall take into account the proposed grading and shall be required to be submitted to and approved by the Planning [;--.vision prior to approval of the final grading plan. ILI _ 3. Existing Eucalyptus trees shall be retained wherever possible and shall be trimmed and topped at 30'. Dead, decaying or potentially dangerous trees shall be approved for removal at the descretion of the Plarning Division during the review of the Master Plan pf Existing On -Site Trees. Those trees which are approved for removal may be required to be replaced on a tree- for -tree basis as provided by the Planning Division. 4. Street trees, a minimum of 15 gallon size or larger, shall be installed in accordance with tlr "aster Plan of street trees for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and shal'< <s planted at an average of every 30' on interior streets and 20' on exterior streets. _ 5. A minimum of 50 trees per gross acre, comprised of the -Following sizes, shall be provides' within the development; 20 % -24° box or larger, 70� -15 gallon, and 10Z -5 gallon. f�6. Ali landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. 7. All slope banks in access of five (5) feet in vertical height shall and are 5:1 or greater slopes be landscaped and irrigated in accordance with slope planting requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Such slope planting shall include but not be limited to rooted ground cover and appropriate shrubs and trees. All such planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection of the slopes shall be completed by the Planning Staff to determine that it is in satisfactory condition. In the case of custom lot subdivisions, all such slopes shall be seeded with native grasses upon complet;or. of grading or an alternative method of erosion control satisfactory to the Building Official. Irrigation on custom lot subdivisions shall be provided to germinate the seed and to a point 6 months after germination. _ 8. All parkways, open areas, and landscapirg shall be fully maintained cy a homeowners association or -ther means acceptable to the City. Such proof of maintenance shall be suomitted to the City prior to issuance of building permits. _ °. The front yard landscaping, and an appropriate irrigation system, shall be installed by the developer in accordance with submitted plans. 10. The final desigr, o': the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping and side:•,a'ks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division. /100,11. A minimum of ''' '� �' _ Cm) specimen size trees shall be planted within the project. 12. Special landscape features such as mounding, alleivial rock, speciman size trees, anj an bundance.Df landscaping is required along 4t2tiU OALO Wrv,Ppr C, A E. additional AoDrovals Recuired S El _ 1. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of a Building Perm-it. 2. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to recordation of the final subdivision map. 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of Zone Change and /or variance /Conditional Use Permit 4. This Conditional. Use Per-sit is granted for a period of months) as which time the Planning Commission. may add or delete conditions or revoke the Conditional Use Permit. 5. The developer is required to obtain the following signed statement by purchasers of homes which have a private or public equestrian trail on or adjacent to their property. In purchasing the home located on Lot , Tract , on , I,have read the ^.C. & R.'s and understand that said Lot is subject to a mutual re- ciprocal e_sement for the purpose of allowing equestrian traffic to gain access. Signed _ Purchaser Said statement is to be filed by the developer with the City prior to occupancy. 6. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to issuance of building permits, when no subdivision map is i -1volved, written certification from all affected School Districts, shall be submitted to the Department of Cc=unity Development which states that adequate school facilities are rr will be capable of accommodating students generatEd by this project. Such letter of certification must fiave been issued by the School District within, sixty (60) days prior to the final map approval i:, the rase of the subdivision map or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. D. Signs !. Any signs proposed for this development shall be designed in conformance with the Comprehensive Sian by the Planning Division'nrior Ordinance. and shall require review and approval to installation of such signs. 2. A uniform sign program for this development shall be submitted to the Planning Division for their review and approval prior to issuance or Building permits. 3. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are not approved with this _ approval and will require separate sign review and approval. E. additional AoDrovals Recuired S El _ 1. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of a Building Perm-it. 2. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to recordation of the final subdivision map. 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of Zone Change and /or variance /Conditional Use Permit 4. This Conditional. Use Per-sit is granted for a period of months) as which time the Planning Commission. may add or delete conditions or revoke the Conditional Use Permit. 5. The developer is required to obtain the following signed statement by purchasers of homes which have a private or public equestrian trail on or adjacent to their property. In purchasing the home located on Lot , Tract , on , I,have read the ^.C. & R.'s and understand that said Lot is subject to a mutual re- ciprocal e_sement for the purpose of allowing equestrian traffic to gain access. Signed _ Purchaser Said statement is to be filed by the developer with the City prior to occupancy. 6. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to issuance of building permits, when no subdivision map is i -1volved, written certification from all affected School Districts, shall be submitted to the Department of Cc=unity Development which states that adequate school facilities are rr will be capable of accommodating students generatEd by this project. Such letter of certification must fiave been issued by the School District within, sixty (60) days prior to the final map approval i:, the rase of the subdivision map or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. OIRIL i. Prior to approval and recordation of the f-;nal map, or prior to the issuance of building permits when no map is involved, written certification from the r affected water district, that adequate sewer and water facilities are c,r will be available to se °ve the proposed project, shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have bzen issued by the water district within sixty (60) days. prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. For projects using septic tank facilities allowable by the Santa Ana Regional Water Control Board and the City, written certi- Fication of acceptability, including all supportive infzrmation, shalt be obtained and submitted to the City. 8. Tcis approval shall become null and void if the tentative subdivision map is not approved and recorded or building permits issued when no map is involved, within twelve (12) months from the approval of this project unless a-i ,xtension has been granted by the Planning Commission. 9. This subdivision was not submitted as a total development package and is required to reapply for a point rating relative to the design section of the Growth Management Ordinance prior to final aporoval and recordation of the map if the subdivision is going to be developed as tract homes. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT '11HE BUILDING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: F. Site Development 'e�1. The applicant shall ccmply with the latest adcpted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Cede, Nat';onal Electric Code, and* all cth,�r applicable codes and ordinances in effect at the time of approval of this project. X 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible constriction, Evidence spa '7l be submitted to the Foothill District Fire Chief that water supply fo:- fire protection is available. ' 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to an existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and Schoci Fee. __/4_ Prior to the issuance e.` a building permit for a new commercial or industrial development. or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fens at the established rate. Such fees may - nclude, but not be limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. 6. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this project within one year from the dame of project approval. Z6_ Street names and addresses shall be provided by the building official. 0 W 7. Owelling units shall be constructed with fire retardant material and non - combustible roof material. All corner dwellings shall have the building elevation facing the street upgrade with additional wood trim around windows and wood siding or plan -ens where appropriate. G. Existino Structures i Provide compliance with the Uniform Buildirg Code for property line clearances considering use, area and fire - resistiveness of exiting buildings. 2. Existing building(s) shall be made to comzz]y with current Building and Zoning regulations for the intended use or the-building shall be demolished. 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, filled and /or capped to comply with appropriate grading practices and the Uniform Plumbing Code. H. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. 3. A geological report sr, 11 be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the t-, a of application for gradirg plan check. -�— - The final grading plan shall be subject to reviev, a,ad arproval by the Planning, Engineering and Building Divisions and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit whichever comes first. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING COP:DITIONS: I. Dedications and Vehicular Access I. Dedications shall be made by final map of ail interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made ,if the following missing rights-of-way on the following streets: additional feet on additional feet on additional feet on J. _ 3. Corner property line radius will be required per City standards. 4. 10 All rights of vehicular ingress to and egress from shail be dedicated as fol lows: Reciprocal easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels over private roads, drives, or parking areas. Z6- Adequate provisions shall be made for the ingress, engress and internal circulation of any trucks which will be used for delivery of goods to the property or in the operation of the prcposed business. Street Improvements I. Construct full street improvements including. but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. 0002- Construct the following missing improvements including, but not limited to: STREET NAME CURB GUTTER A.C. PMr. SIDE- WALK DRIVE APPR. , STREET LIGHTS f A.C. OVERLAY WHEEL CHAIR RAt4PS OTHER 3. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, an encroachment permit and fees shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. _ 4. Street improvement plans approved by the City Engineer and prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer shall be required, for all street improvements, prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. 5. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney, guaranteeing complet3,or, of the public improvements, prior to recording of the map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. 6. All street imprnvements shall be insta ?led to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, prior to occupancy.- 7. Pavement striping, marking, traffic and street name signing shall be installed per the requirements of the City Engineer. 41 K. Drainage and 'Mood Control —Z 1. The applicant will be responsible for construction of all onsite drainage facilities required by the City Engineer. 2. intersection drains will be required at the following locations: _Z3. The proposed project falls within areas indicated as subject to flooding under the National Flood Insurance program and is subject to the provisions -of the program and City Ordinance No. 24. 4. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall will be required to protect �— — i,." e structures by diverting shunt r3rn ff to spree... 5. The following north -south streets shall be designed as major water carrying streets requiring a combination of special curb heights, commercial type drive approaches, rolled street connections, flood protection walls, and /or landscaoed earth berms and rolled driveways at property line. E. utilities i 1. All proposed utilities within the project shall be installed underground including utilities along major arterials less than 12 KV. ( 2. Utility easements shall be provided to the specification, of the serving utiiity companies and the City Engineer. 3. Developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing public ` utilities, as required. 4. Developer shalt be respoosible for the installation of street lighting in ` accordance with Southern California Edison Company and City standards. 5. Water and sewer system plans shall be designed and constructed to meet requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CMM), Foothill Fire District and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance form CC14D will be required prf.r to recordati:n. 6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested ` agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. _- M. General Recuire^ents and Approvals 1. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: A. Caltrans for: county 3. County Oust Abatement required prior to ;ssuance of a grading pe mit) C_ San Bernardirc, County Flood Control District D. Other: _ 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC &R's) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners Association, subject to the approval of the City Attorney, shall be recorded "with this map and a copy provided to the City. _ _ 3. Prior to recordation, a notice of intention to form Lanascape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Council. The engineering costs involved in Districts Formation shall be borne by the developer. - 4. Final parcel and tract maps shall conform to City standards and p:.:cedures. 7 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING THE TIME EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 81 -02 uuEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension for the above- described project, pursuant to Section 61.0219(o)8B of the Zoning Ordinance; a:,d WHEREAS, the Planning Commission previously approved the above- described project. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following fin ings: A. That prevailing economic conditions and interest rates have caused a distressed market climate for this project. B. That current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable to construct the project at this time. C. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations wo,!ld not be consistent with the intent of the Zoning Code. D. That the granting of said time extension will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: time extension or: PROJECT The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a APPLICANT CUP 81 -02 ANDERSON EXPIRATION FEBRUARY 25, 1985 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24T4 DAY OF AUGUST, 1983. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG.A BY Dennis L. Stout, a3 .an Resolution No. Page 2 ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning ommission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of August, 1983, by ttie Following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: C �.J 0 13 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CX) C`Mo STAFF REPORT ]*7 Fp:�� DATE: Al 24, 1983 v� 1977 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krail, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: ENViROlih9ENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8106 - DAON CORP. - A division of acres into parce s wit in Subarea of the Industrial Specific Plan located on the north side of Arrow Route, east of Utica Avenue - APN 208 -052 -1 through 70 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: To approve the parcel map. B. Pur.pPose.:. To subdivide existing 1 -lot industrial condominium area intparcels. C. Location: North side of Arrow Route, approximately 170 feet east of Utica Avenue. D. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 4.91 acres Parcel 2 2.99 acres Total i.�� acres E. Existing Zoning" Subarea 7 of the Industrial Specific Plan; I— Istria -P'l . F. Existing Land Use: Parcel 1 - Industrial Park Condo Parcel 2 - Vacant. G. Surrounding Land Use_ and Zoning: North - Lig tin ustria Subarea 7 South - Vacant; Subarea 7 East - Vacant; Subarea 7 West - K -Mart; Subarea 7. H. General Plan Desiqnations: North - In •ustrial Park South - General Industrial East - Industrial Park Nest - Industrial Park. ITEM E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Parcel Map 8106 - Daon Corp. August 24, 1983 Pale 2 1. Site Characteristics: There are existing light - industrial condominiums on Parcel No. 1. Parcel No. 2 is vacant. iI. ANALYSIS: The applicant is requesting to subdivide a property on which a deveTopment of a 70 -unit industrial condominium project was previously approved by the City. However, only 43 units so far have been built and all of these units ere contained within Parcel No. I of the proposed map. The subdivision will result in the developed portion being separated from the vacant portion. No development has been proposed on the vacant land (Parcel No. 2) at this time. Parcel No. 1 will remain as a condominium project. Necessary revisions to C.C.&R.s to reflect this :hange of use needs to be completed prior to recordation of the map. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Also attached for your review and consideration is art o. t e nit;al Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. !Upon completion and review of the Initial Study and field investiga. ion, Staff found no adverse impacts on the environment as a result of thi! proposed subdivision. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Publi.: Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been completed. 40 V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommendei that the Planning Commission consider alai —input and elements of the project. If, after such consideration, the Commission can support the recommended conditions of approval as written in the City Engineer's teport, then adoption of the attached resolution would be appropriate. It is also recommenced that a Negative Declaration be issued. Resolution City Engineer's Report Initial Study E El b IV T \ \1 re.c VII 6T, ,_T - -ILY v �e O _- AltRUW 1 TY OF RANCHO CUCANK ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY MAP wn nppo O� D nwY:. title; A� 1 ! page w.1 u ? csOzK I e�c i •a c 1111 11 �, �• J IM Ar b IV T \ \1 re.c VII 6T, ,_T - -ILY v �e O _- AltRUW 1 TY OF RANCHO CUCANK ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY MAP wn nppo O� D nwY:. title; A� 1 ! page ' � F M V as Sij 5.•!7•,81 t _ w 41iiiA I S I •' ` r x f G M V t _ w - I S I •' ` r x f G l `r� -_c_ :�= == Vii• -� F oW ,>c— ..,::::�-.::�.._.; LLJt Q CL ` J ion O Ld LLJ 0 'j v ona G�1 l� a U 4i M V e L fr•-n q l t i i�� a !L I1 I III �•= I i , II IZ i II Ri r i� I,yI 7 � c I C ::r 14"" 1.. w i it IIii r Y <r ,it err QQ� j i E E 0 t _ w - I S I •' ` r x f i6& .l `r� -_c_ :�= == Vii• -� F ,>c— ..,::::�-.::�.._.; e L fr•-n q l t i i�� a !L I1 I III �•= I i , II IZ i II Ri r i� I,yI 7 � c I C ::r 14"" 1.. w i it IIii r Y <r ,it err QQ� j i E E 0 _ w - I f e L fr•-n q l t i i�� a !L I1 I III �•= I i , II IZ i II Ri r i� I,yI 7 � c I C ::r 14"" 1.. w i it IIii r Y <r ,it err QQ� j i E E 0 \. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL, STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projzcts requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is :Wade. Upon receipt of t ^is application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Rev:�ew Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed. project. PROJECT TITLE: Tentative Parcel Map 8106 APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Daon Corporation 3200 Parkcenter Drive, Suite 1400, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: L. D. Kin Attn: D. H. 517 N Euclid Avenue, Ontario CA 91762 phone: 714/988 -54 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) Lot 1, Tract 11700 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: LT T� I -1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Subdivision of Lot 1, Tract 11700 into iwo parce s ACREAGE OF FROJECT AREA AND. SQURRE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING ;LNU PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: Acrf.age = 7.90 acres. No buildings proposed for the purpose of thiss oarce map. is 3no buflcdinas DESCRIBE THE E- JVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMIATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ;LNIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HHISTOP.ICXIL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, ANL THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): This project is in the Rancho s at condominiums on t on arce o_ 2_ ncivaina sewer . i anc a Business ?ark. The area is Lion oT uti :sties, stomp drains s part of e overall project. ready developed. There are rtv except on tFe eas er esent time. There are existing which are to remain. No > ities are on both parce s, nd electric. There are ,and - t concrete pavement on a�.e- -Three drive ga.�ys _a ready tor- s oroiect wi!] blend in with ness Nark. Is the project part of a larger prcject, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole 'nave significant environ,-aental i vact? This project is part of the Rancho Cucamonga Business ?ark project. C� 1-2 2 11 WILL THIS PROJECT: YES %0 X 1. Create a substantia_ change in gr:)urd contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration:' X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for "— municipal services (police, fire; water, sewage, etc.)? X 4. Create changes in the existing, no -ing or general plan designations? _ X 5. Remove any existing trees? Low many' - X 6. C=reate the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flarmables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers abovet _ IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form en the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of rY knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional info_.,ation may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Deveionment Review Coa�ittee. Date 7-//L LQ l3 Signature Title AC,_1&7 4 1-3 RRSIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTICN The following information should be provided to the C =ty of Rancho Cucamone Plar -zing Division in order tc aid in assessing the ability of. the school district to accommodate the proposed residential de:•elopment. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Specific Location of Project: PH;,SE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL 1. Number of single family units: 2.. Number of multiple fanny units. J. Date proposed to begin, construction.: 4. Earliest date of _ occupancy: Model and r of Tentative S. Bedrooms Piice Pange 1-4 0 El n RESOLUTION NO. * A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARC�AThMAP ON NUMBER 8106 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. 8106), THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE, SOUTH OF UTICA AVENUE WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 8106, submitted by Daon Corporation and consisting of 2 parcels, located on the north side of Arrow Route, east of Utica Avenue, being a division of Lot 1 of Tract No. 11700 as recorded in Book 167, pages 75 & 75, Office of County Recorder, San c�ernardine County, State of California; and WHEREAS, on ;iuly 11, 1983, a formal application requesting review of the above - described Tentative Map; and Commission held a duly was submitted WHEREAS, on August 24, 1983, the Planning advertised public hearing for the above - described map. FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING ;- OMNISSION RESOLVED AS SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is ccnsistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable fay- the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements wl not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse environmenta impacts and a Negative Declaration is issued on August 24, 1983. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 8106 is approved subject to the recommended conditions of Approval Dertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1983- PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Dennis L. Stout, Chairman Resolution No. Page 2 ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of August, 1983, by the following vote- to-wit: AYES: CCMMISSICNERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 11 0 El rl LJ 11 Ll CITY OF RANCHO CUCA14ONGA RECOW"DED COQJTIOAS OF APPROVAL LOCATION: North side of Arrow Rte. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 8106 East of Utica Avenue DATE FILED: 7/11/83 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: a subdivision of Lot 1, NUMBER OF LOTS: 2 Tract No. 11700 as recorded in Book, 157,_ GROSS ACREAGE: 7.9 _ 75 & 76 Offices of , ASSESSOR PARCEL N0. 208 -052 -1 - 70 of California ,..,,_ --- DEVELOPER OWNER ENGINEERISURV`Et'OR Oaoa Corp_ same L. D. King 3200 rarkcenter Dr. 527 N. Euclid Ave. Suite 1400 Ontario CA 91762 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Improvement and dedication requirements in accordance with Title 15 of the Municipal Ccde of the City of Rancho Cecamonga include, but may not be limited ta, the following: Dedications and Vehicular Access 1. Dedications shall be made of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the following streets: additional feet on additional feet on additional feet on 3. Corner property line radius will be required per City Standards. X 4. All rights of vehicular ingress and egress shall be dedicated as follows: Arrow Route except for existing openings. X 5. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all common roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by C.C. &R.s and shall be recorded concurrent with the map. 6. All existing easements lying within future right -of -way are to be quitclaimed or delineated on the map per City Engineer's requirements. X 7. Easements for sidewalk for public use shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. Surety 1. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements prior to recording for and /or prior to building permit issuance or 2. A lien agreement must be executed prior to recording of the map for the following :_ 3. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed, guaranteeing completion of all on -site drainage facilites necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Divison prior to recording for and /or prior to issuance of building permit for Street Improvements Pursuant to the City of Ranch Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title 16, Section 16.36.120, the subidiver may enter into an agreement and post security with the City guaranteeing the required construction prior to recordation of the map and /or building permit issuance. 1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. 2. A minimum of 26 -foot wide pavement within a 40 -foot wide dedicated right -of -way shall be constructed for all half - section streets. 3. Construct the following missing improvements: Prior to recordation for Prior to building permit issuance for Street Name Curb F Gutter A.0 . Pvmt. i e- I Walk Drive Appr. Street Trees Street Lights A.C. Overlay Median Island* Other -4-1 *Includes landscaping and irrigation or meter 11 4. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obta`.ned from the City.Ingineer °s Office, in addition to any other permits required. 5. Street improvement plans shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. 6. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the existing public relocation of a;sy power pules or other utilities as necessary. 7. Existing lines of 12KV or less fronting the property shal i be undergrounded. S. install appropriate street name signs, traffic control signs, types approved by the striping and markings with locations and City Engineer. 9. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho decorative poles with Cucamonga. Lights shall be on underground service. 10. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permit. AIUL 11. Concentrated drainage f'.ows shall not cross sidewalks. iindersidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards. Drainage and Flood Control 1. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated or noticed on the final map. 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal the from adjacent areas. of surface drainage entering property ?. The following storm drain shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 4. Prior to recordation of the map, a hydrologic and drainage study for the project shall be submitted to the City Engineering for review. 5. A drainage detention basin per City Standards shall be constructed to detain increased runoff E Grading X 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. 3. A geciogical report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of z.pplication or grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Grading Committee and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit whichever comes first. X 5. Final grading plan for Parcel No. 2 is to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of building permit. General Requirements and Approvals 1. Permits from other agencies will be required as fo'ilows• CalTrans for San Bernardino County Flood Control District is Cucamonga County Water District for sewer and water San Bernardino County Dust Abatement (required prior to issuance of a grading permit) Other X 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (C.C. &R.$) approved by the City Attorney is required prior to recordation of the map. 3. Provide all utility services to each lot including sewerage, water, electric power, gas and telephone prior to street constructon. 4. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. 5. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CalTrans /San Bernardino County Flood Control District. 6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be.subject to any requirements that may be received from them. E El X 7. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity_ Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. 8, local and Master Planned Trails shall be provided in accordance with the Trail Plan. A detailed trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing and weed control, in accordance with City trail standards, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to recordation for and /or prior to building permit issuance for 9. Prior to recording, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District 82 -1 among the newly created parcels. X 10. At the time of final map submittal, the following shall be submitted: Title Report, traverse calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and /or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. X 11. A statement that Parcel No. 1 is a condominium development is to be noted on the Map. C1TY OF RANCHO CUCA140NSA LLOYD B. MBBS, CITY ENGINEER 40 by: E �I E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 24, 1983 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DARCEL •4AP 8050 - BARNES - D division o acres o and within the Su area of the Industrial Specific Plan located at the northwest corner of Ninth Street and Helms Avenue - APN 209 - 022 -12 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested. To approve the parcel map. B. Purpose: To subdivide 1.4 acres into 2 parcels for the purpose of creating a separate parcel for an existing building. C. Location: Northwest corner of 9th Street and Helms Avenue. D. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 .72 acre Parcel 2 .68 acre Total x.40 acres E. Existing Zoning: Subarea No. 3 of the Industrial Specific Plan. F. Existing Land Use: Parcel 1 - existing electronic firm; Parcel 2 - vacant. G. Surrounding Land Use and Zoninq North - Vacant; Subarea No. South - Existing Industrial Building; Subarea No. 3 East - Existing industrial Building; Subarea No. 3 West - Vacant; Subarea No. 3. H. General Plan Desi nations: riort - u area ho. , In ustrial Specific Plan south - Subarea No. 3, Industrial Specific Plan East - Subarea No. 3, Industrial Specific Plan West - Subarea No. 3, Industrial Specific Plan. ITEM F PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Parcel Map 8066 - Barnes August 24, 1983 Page 2 1. Site Characteristics: The site slopes approximately 1% in a southerly direction. Parcel 1 contains an existing building and parking area. Parcel 2 is vacant. II. ANALYSIS• This project meets the industrial Specific Plan standards wHiE requires 1/2 acre parcels in Subarea No. 3. Street improvements are existing on 9th Street and Helms Avenue. The developer has no plans for the development of Parcel 2 at this time. However, the applicant intends to build on it in the near future. III. ENVTDnMkZCNT5l REVIEk: Also attached for your review and consideration Ts art I of t.eF— Initial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part Ii of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Upor completion and review of the Initial Study and field investigation, Staff found no adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the proposed subdivision. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATION: it is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input and elements of the project. If, after such consideration, the Commission can support the recommended conditions of approval as written in the City Engineer's Report, then adoption of the attached resolution would be appropriate. It is also recommended that a Negative It Declaration be issued. Resp�tfuily subm' ed, v L Ii:ri Attachments: Map Resolution City Engineer's Report Initial Study r L' J Ll -#7 AC N/L 3! 2.10 AC G 2.06AC (n t J za 2Ac N%L LU IVIAFT+r- ti Pcr? i Par .5 Pcr6 Z Pa[ 1 Per. i Q _ ! ED t Pa r. 2 i Par.4 Par. ? Sc 4c 272 4C r �G�CT['T TI7LL m i (Q`� F Fl n8 6C r.3.7 Par. 2 �T or� CY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY MAP 22 25., title; �T pale a { I 6 r t hTL.LMAN AVENUE V i8 �• A T" C, O h Q 1y • `YI i a Y ° '^ lzVI J _ Am ` O i 1 Ca r1•- O S N �NN�ts z' osY 'S mNSn10 D9NOW _ C. yDCi9i z n D 1 Orn1 •( KO! «Z O OON ^nl xO � 2aN N S �10ZC � o >t1m a rr s��• p o X. z 1` - n _'�c...•..9 c -wt. nsx s. 6 .. (� .. � nN° 00 = °.�im+� I � �,p�rn BI y 1 S :aElMS - "• "'s' `• AVENUE J t .QS S 8 ° -41 2 •_a Q dpc� NNuu 1 n L� a C, n n •` rEF • 4 el ee�'p�j�tY I c o i 1 Ca r1•- O S N �NN�ts z' osY 'S mNSn10 D9NOW _ C. yDCi9i z n D 1 Orn1 •( KO! «Z O OON ^nl xO � 2aN N S �10ZC � o >t1m a rr s��• p o X. z R Y L1 .a Y ] ro Z n i � CoQo !vu[MUw ' /�°C1C V. OI HL qY .f,•1V J��.ypN y(T 11 rj'V ARCHIBALD t; � r •os L%F a �m xG kn� 7 i H:O O AVENUE a�isi....t .�... - n _'�c...•..9 c -wt. nsx s. 6 .. (� .. � nN° 00 = °.�im+� r_.__ �,p�rn � _ y 1 S :aElMS - "• "'s' `• AVENUE °s .QS c Q b NNuu 1 L� a C, n • �, -,�n' sO Sf •` rEF ,v j�� {roi m ams� aC i ee�'p�j�tY r �•Ck 4 R Y L1 .a Y ] ro Z n i � CoQo !vu[MUw ' /�°C1C V. OI HL qY .f,•1V J��.ypN y(T 11 rj'V ARCHIBALD t; � r •os L%F a �m xG kn� 7 i H:O O AVENUE h a �•; ~ $p >]iQ3q �e�n3 y 1 S °s .QS c Q b NNuu 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INrORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this fora,:ust be completed and submitted to the Development Review Co: =?Ili ttee t°,-rough the department where the project application is made. Upon_ receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Develo pment. Review Committee will meet and take sction no later than ten (10; days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one .g three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration wall be filed, 2) The project wil:r have a significant environmental impact and an Enviro=nmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report shcald be supplied by the applicant g_ving further irforma- tiou con = erring the proposed project. PROJECT TTTLE: Te,�ve F. °d. No. APPLICANT'S NAIM, ADDRESS, ' TELEPHONE: Mr. Louis 3arres (714) 952 -4234 NAME, ADDP.ESS, TE LEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: c LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS A 4 ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) LIST OT.7WR PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, PEGIONAL, STATE ARID FEDERAL AGENCIES AND ThE AGFNC: ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: 0 I -1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: It is proposed that the existing parcel be divided into two by a nor-m-south line. Existing struc ure o ee on the westerly parcel and a new structure to be built on the easterly ACREAG.? OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EY.ISTII_G AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: Existir_g proiect area contains 1.40 o__c ___— _ . �._....___A 1...;147x. . rpm pin l n_ nno so ft. each. DESCRIBE THE E.NIRON51ENTAL SET -TING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFOR,Nle TION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PIJA.NTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, F.ISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPEC23, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SEEETS): E:ccept for the existing building .& parking area the property is vacant land. -- There are no cultrral, historical or scenic aspects involved. Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative acticns, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environment-al impact? No. 1 -2 0 i , i.f r L WILL THIS PP03ECT: Y =S KO X 1. Create a substantial change in ground —" conto=s? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for m ~nicipal service_ (police, fire, water, sewage, etc-)? X q. Create changes in the existing ^oning or general plan designations? X 5. Remove anv existing trees? How many? X 6. Create -the need for use or disposal of potent °_ally hazardous =atecials such as toxic sub -z- ances, fla=aLles or explosives? Explanation of eny YES answers above: LI IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATE.^N— I h_reby certify that the sta _ements furnished above and in the attached exhibits iresent the data and .nfcrmaaon required fo- this ir_itiai evaluation to the best of nm- ability, and that the facts, statements, y info -mation presented are tx-ue and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further une-erstand that additional information :nay be required to be sub?nitted before an adeauate evaluation can be made b_: the Development Review Co a i(tee. Date _Signature _ Title 7 -3 RESIDENTIAL CONSTRrUCTION The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamong Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Specific Location of Project: Prii:SE -RASE 2 PHis � 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL 1. Nx=ber of single family units: 2. Number of multiple family ::nits: 3. Date proposed to begin construction: _ 4. Earliest date of occupancy: !Model # and # of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price Range I -4 0 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANOHO(TE TAATIVE PARCEL CALIFORNIA, APPROVING NO 8060) ,PAL P NUMBER LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 9TH STREET AND HELMS AVENUE WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 8060, submitted by Louis Barnes and consisting of 2 parcels, located on the northwest corner of 9th Street and Helms Avenue, being a division of portion f t eWsouth '1 2 of the i southeast 1/4 of Section 10, Tvwnship of Cucamonga, recorded in Book 4, Page 9, records of San Bernardino County, Cali 'lorniay and WHEREAS, on July 15, 1983, a formal application requesting review of the above- described Tentative Map; and Comn:ssion held a duly Was submitted WHEREAS, on August 24, 1983, the Planning advertised public hearing for the above - described map. FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING C"ISSION RESOLVED AS SECTION 1: That the. following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affeacts on abutting proper t;; . SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse ervironmenta impacts and a Negative Declaration is issued on August 24, 1983. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 8060 is approved subject to the recommended Conditions of Approval pertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1983. PLANNTNG COMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 11 Resolution No. Page 2 BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission T, JACK LkM, Secretary of the Planning rN:.��i$$ivr. Gf the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regular'-. introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of ,rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of August, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: El El 11 11 El 1] CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECOWIEFiDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL LOCATION: Northwest corner of Helms TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.: M Ave. and 9th Street DATE FILE: 7/15/83 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: P portion of the south NUMBER OF LOTS: 2 1/2 of the southeast 1/4 Section 10, Township GROSS ACREAGE: 1.4 acres 1 South, Range 7 12s1-. as shown on map ASSESSOR, PARCEL NO. nf furamonaa_ Records of Cucamonaa_ Records of San Bernardino DEVELOPER OWNER ERGINEER /SURVEYOR Louis Barnes same Associated Engineers 1486 Red Hill North Or. Upland, CA 91785 316 East "E" Street Ontario, CA 91764 Improvement and dedication requirements in accordance with Title 16 of the Municipal Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga include, but m' not be limited to, the following: Dedications and Vehicular Access 1. Dedications shall be made of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the following streets: additional feet on additional feet on additional feet on 3. Corner property line radius will be required per City Standards. 4. All rights of vehicular ingress and egress shall be dedicated as follows: X 5. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all common roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided prior to recordation of the Map. All existing easements lying within future right -of -way are to be quitclaimed or delineated on the map per City Engineer's requirements. for sidewalk for public use shall be dedicated sidewalks meander through private property. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements prior to building permit issuanc-I for Parcel 2. A lien agreement crust be executed prior to recording of for the following: Surety shall he posted and an agreement executed, guaranteeing completion of all on --site drainage facilites necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Divison prior to recording for and /or prior to issuance of building permit for Street Improvements Pursuant to the City of Ranch Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title 16, Section 16.36.120, the subidiver may enter into an agreement and post security with the City guaranteeing the required construction prior to recordation of the map and /or building permit issuance. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. A minimum of 26 -foot dedicated right -of -way section streets. wide pavement within shall be constructed Construct the following missing improvements: Prior to building permit issuance for Parcel No. i Cur Street Name Gutter A. Pvmt. iae- Walk Drive treet Apor. Trees Street Lights A. U. Overlay Median Island* Other 9th St. X Helms Ave. X X 1 landscaping and irrigation or meter to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other ` �>m permits required. R. 5. Street improvement plans shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. X 6. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. X 7. Existing lines of 12KV or less fronting the property shall be undergrounded. 3. Install appropriate street name signs, traffic control signs, striping and markings with locations and types approved by the City Engineer. X 9. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Lights shall be on decorative poles with underground service. X 10. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permit. 11. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. llndersidewaik drains shall be installed to City Standards. Drainage and Flood Control 1. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated or noticed on the final map. 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 3. The following storm drain shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 4. Prior to recordation of the map, a hydrologic and drainage stu6y for the project shall be submitted to the City Engineering for review. 5. h drainage detention basin per City Standal Is shall oe constructed to detain increased runoff E Grading X i. Grading Dn i fors grading substan plan. of the subject property shall be in accordart :e with the Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted practices. The final grading plan shall be in tial conformance with the approved conceptual grading 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application or grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Grading Committee and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit whichever comes first. X 5. Final grading plan Building and Safety building permit. General Requirements and Approvals for Parcel 2 is to be submitted to the Division for approval prior to issuance of i. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: CalTrans :or San Bernardino County—F-i-cod Control District Cucamonga County Water District for sewer and water San Bernardino County Dust Abatement (required prior to issuance of a grading permit) Other 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (C.C. &R.$) approved by the City Attorney is required prior to recordation of the map. X 3. Provide all utility services to each lot including sewerage, water, electric power, gas and telephone prior to street constructon. X 4. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. 5. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CalTrans /San Bernardino County Flood Control District. X 6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. u X 7. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. when building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will he asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. 8. Local and Master Planned Trails shall be provided in accordance with the Trail Plan. A detailed trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing and weed control, in accordance with City trail standards, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to recordation for and /or prior to building permit issuance for 9. Prior to recording, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District 82-1 among the newly created parcels_ 10. At the time of final map submittal, the following shall be submitted: Title Report, traverse calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and /or showing original land division. tie notes and bench marks referenced. El CIT. OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LLOYD B. HUBBS, CITY ENGINEER by: 11 1] D DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CLTAMONGP MEMORANDUM August 24, 1983 Members of the Planing Commission. Rick Gomez, City Planner Dan Coleman, Associate Planner IM ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AOND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 83 -17 - $TR K e eve opnent of apartment units on 4. acres in the R -3 zone located on the east side of Ramona, north of Foothill - APN 1077- 621 -31 (a portion). PARCEL MAP 8100 - BWLC - A division of 9.82 acres into 2 parce s within the C -2 and R -3 zones located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Ramona Avenue - APN 1077 - 621 -28, ?t. BACKGROUND: Based upon Grading Committee recommendation, a hydrology study was needed to determine the capacity of the existing channel along the east property line. This information was not provided by the applicant in time for staff to review and provide you a final recommendation. Further, a meeting with surrounding homeowners will be conducted August 18, 1983. Assuming a successful meeting with the homeowners, we would anticipate bringing a detailed analysis and recommendation to you- for presentation at the next meeting. The applicant has consented to a continuance. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the public hearing for the prcjact and the parcel map be continued to September 14, 1983. Respectfully submitted, Iwo-- - Ricb Gomez City Planner RG:DC:jr ITEMS G & H CITY OF RANCHO CT7CAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: August 24, 1983 TO: Members of the Planning Commissior FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner SUBJECT: USE DETERMINATION - SLANCO INVESTMENTS - A request to etermine if a mini -star age faci ity would be considered similar to ether uses permitted in the C -2 zone. Proposed project to be located on the southeast corner of Helms Avenue and Hampshire Street. Due to the late arrival of information from unable to prepare a staff report in time for Staff will prepare a detailed report to Commissioners on Monday, August 11 RG /jr C• 1 LJ the applicant, staff was inclusion in this packet. be delivered to the ITEM I E. 11 E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 22, 1983 TO: Chairman and Members of the Plar..ing Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner SUBJECT: request c determine if a s appropriate in the C -2 zone. ABSTRACT: The Interim Zoning Ordinance allows the Planning Commission to determine if a proposed use is similar in nature and scone to those permitted or conditionally permitted within a zoning district if not specifically listed. Attached is a letter from Blanco Investments and Land, Limited requesting direction from the Planning Commission regarding the development of a mini - storage facility. BACKGROUND: This particular parcel was part of a four - '1 subdivision in conjunction with the Woolworth Garden Center. the time of this subdivision, Hamphshire Street_ was extended to Helms, leaving a residual p- el of two acres south of Hampshire. The Planning Commission had speci; iz- concerns as to the future use of parcel 4 and the viability as a retail commercial site because of its location behind the Garden Center and Perry's Market and with its proximity to residential uses. ANALYSIS: Section 61.027(b) of the Interim Zoning Ordinance, C -2 C mmmercial District, provides no referen ^e :u nA ni- storage facilities as proposed by Bianco Investments and Land, __Imited. The C -2 zone (General Business District) provides for the more intense retail and service 'uses. The General Plan outlines Foothill Boulevard and adjacent areas between Grove and Haven as activities which are heavily auto - dependent and will continue to provide a ser-Ace function to the community. Based on the General Plan language and uses described in the Zoning Ordinance, such as RV storage facilities, bus depots and terminals, contractor's yards and swap meets, a mini- storage could be considered similar with a Conditional Use Permit. As to the concerns regarding commercial exposure and viability along with neighborhood and architectural compatibility, the Conditional Use Permit and Design /Development Review process will analyze the impact- associated with a mini - warehouse and its appropriateness at this site. ITEM I Zoning Ordinance Determination Aug;ist 22, 1983 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider this request ana make a Zoning Ordinance determination as t3 whether t;,e proposed use is similar in nature to be ellowed or to be considered to be permitted within the C -2 zone with a Conditional Lsa Permit, consistent with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance and General Plan. Aptachmerts: fror., PiaF,co Investments Map 5582 _ Juts August 18, 1983 1 A Mr. Rick Gomez City of Rancho Cucamonga 932S Baseline Road post office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Lear Rick: Enclosed for your use is the letter you requested from the present owner of the proposed self storage facility to be located on the Southeast corner cf Helms Avenue and Hampshire Street, Also enclosed, pleases find the proposed north elevation, west elevation, and s proposed site plan for the property. I have enclosed several :opies of each for your use. I will be in touch so we can proceed and hopefully meet next Friday's deadline. Your cooperation in this matter is greatly appreciated. Regards, s ack Gaal Blanco Investments And Land, JG: cz Enclosures •.t ' Y n Ltd, tt = Lu, MMM C=M U.S.A. son. I I i — .. -.g ..... �. .. .. CHARLES J. INVESTMENTS August_ 15, 1983 HUGHES City of Rancho Cucamonga 9329 Baseline Road P.O_ Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Proposed storage facility ATIN: Rancho Cucamong= Planning Division, and Development Review_ Enclosed is a renderirq of a self - storage facility being proposed for the Southeast corner of Helms Avenue and Hampshire Street. Legal description of the subiect property is as follows: Parcel 4 or Parcel number 6582 in the City of Rancho Cucamonga_ County of San Bernadino, State of California as per map recorded in Book 70 of Parcel Map pages 57 and 59 records in said County_ My intention is to complete and submit all requirements necessary to obtain a Conditional Use Permit for the �Fubiect property prior to the filing deadline of August 2u, 1933. I have appointed Mr. John A. Gall, Vice- President Real Estate, Blanco Investment and Land Limited, P.J. Box East Irvine, CA 92650 (714) 855 -0311, as my agent for the proposed self- storage facility. Anv questions and /or comments pertaining to the proposed project should be directed to Mr. Gall at the above address or phone number. We are looking forward to a mutually beneficial and successful protect_ very trulv yours, Charles Hu . �s CJH:sr 1101 Fulton Avenue. SWle C • Seoremen!o. CA 95825 7 C. 11 LJ PARCEL PAP 6582 c'FOO TMI• 1 �i Vt fe �cl .. " t- .i/ c" title; `° CITY OF RANCHO CLV-,4,ti 10NGA <p �` �,n PM 6582 —i� A c. 4� ENGINEERING DIVISION N �', � l> VICINITY MAP page a t 1 �i Vt fe �cl .. " t- .i/ c" title; `° CITY OF RANCHO CLV-,4,ti 10NGA <p �` �,n PM 6582 —i� A c. 4� ENGINEERING DIVISION N �', � l> VICINITY MAP page a 11 CYrY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM August 15, 1983 i To: Pla-ming Commission From: Bill Hoiley, Director Community Services Department Subject: Heritage Park Site Plan Review Heritage Park is being „somitted to the Planning Commission £or Your review, comments and recommendations as it moves on its way to Ci`y Council. Attached you will find sections of the Design Development Report (MR) which focuses upon the Development Concept a-nd Possible Environmental Impacts. They are self explanatory and we will not replicate that infor- mation herein. Action requested: 1. Review and comment as to Development Concept; 2. Review and comment as to Environment Impact; 3. Forward to City Council, via a Planning Commission motion, recommendation on Heritage Park Development Concept and Environmental Impact. At the meeting we will present, "briefly ", the public input process used to develop what you have before you. Also, Ron Paige of Recreation Systems, will be available for any question you may have. If prior to the meeting you have any question, please give me a call. cc: Council City Manager ITEM J 0 methodology : The provision of park and recreation facilities is a people oriented program, and successful implementation requires Public support and involvement. In an effort to establish m =xin1UM1 citizen participation in the lannin A g process, the City established a fourteen ruember Community Task Force to work with staff and the consultants in the preparation of the master plan for the park. Task Force members were se- lected to give a balanced representation to anticipated user groups, neighborhood residents, involved City functions, and general community -wide interests. The Task Force met six times, with the primary objectives being to develop recommendations on the functional scope of intended uses, the allocation of spaces, and the arrange- 40 ment of final facilities. The group operated under a con- sensus format, encouraging full discussion of all issues from a variety of perspectives and backgrounds, including active involvement by staff members responsible for miaintenance and operation. A public meeting was also conducted on the park site where recor,aended plans were reviewed with adjacent residents and other interested citizens. A formal presentation was made to the ?ark Advisory Committee, and citizens in attendance were given the opportunity to give input and have questions answered by staff representatives or the cons0 Cant. t L . The entire process was designed to develop public input and provide opportunities to react to proposed concepts, solutions and compromises. site description The park site is located in northwest Rancho Cucamonga at the southwest corner of Hillside Road and Beryl Street, T „= Q YY .- imntaly 42 acre site is bordered to the west and . -X .... -._ north by residential developments and to the south and east by vineyards. The project site is taisected by the Army Corps of Engineers' Demens Creek Channel and Rancho Wash flood control improvements. These fence -lined concrete channels segregate the park site into three distinct areas. No vehicle, pedestrian, or equestrian crossings exist. The majority of the site was formerly a vineyard and is relatively clear, sloping from 5 to 15 percent to the south. The natural canyon area slopes are in excess of ( 15% gradient. The only significant vegetation on the site is in steep areas where vineyard cultivation was not done. This includes some oak and chaparral in the northwest canyon and on slopes in the southwest corner of t,ie property. The remainder of the site is abandoned vineyards. An existing riding ring is located in the southeast corner of the park site. This facility was built by local eques- trian interests and is actively used. A dirt parking area and driveway off Beryl Avenue currently serves the riding t ring facility. Vehicle access to the parksite is currently from Beryl Avenue. Equestrian and pedestrian access to limited areas of the site is from existing trails off of Hillside Road and Beryl Street, and trails that parallel the storm drain channels. r L4 i. LI 11 u f 1 de y map � . _ ._ .f ' 'y i� n- x '. '�'L ., :.,, .. ;..< .. ,,, . <; :. ;. ,..` ..: ;. �,: . .. . :,. .;�. z,. '.� ; 11 • C ( C ! r r r r r C de I ES r 11 14: J t � - -- �� 1' r i j ttI F' M / t i ice' Ir I � )- ' a I •- -j � I� � ilk- 1 I. v 11 14: J t � - -- �� 1' r i j ttI F' M / t i development concept design overview As a community park, Heritage Park provides a variety of facilities to serve the recreation needs of the Rancho Cuca- monga population. There were several key factors during the design development process, however, that significantly affected the final park master plan. The design of the park was moat influenced by existing site conditions and engineering restr;ctions. The Army Corps of Engineers' flood contn)"I channels divide the site into three isolated parcels. This division not only affects internal park circulation `,ut the actual size and configuration of facilities. The existing 8% gradient of the site was another major aspect �ihich had an impact on the master plan design. There is a 100 foot elevation difference between the northern and southern park boundaries. With the major facilities being equestrian arenas, sportsfields, and parking areas (ail requiring fairly level areas), the engineering and cost impacts becane significant design factors. Paciiities were located to reduce the great amount of grading required. The design intent included a balance of cut and fill, with on -site material independentl;; obtained from grading operations within three segments o:° the park. This would allow convenient phasing of grading operations, if neces- sary, and reduce costs by eliminating heavy equipment channel crossings to redistribute material. Community recreation interests exp -essed through City staff, �1 1►:J E I- park advisory committee, and public participation also con- tributed to the master plan design. A popular activity that is currently enjoyed at the park site and fits into the rural character of the park is horse - oack riding. Equestrian interests are strong in Rancho Cucamonga_ Many neighboring residences have horse corrals in their backyards. A regional equestrian trail system is planned along Demen's Creek Channel and Beryl Street, making this park an excellent terminus for equestrian trails. Interests were expressed in expanding proposed equestrian facilities to allow organized competitive horse shows sponsored by local equestrian groups. As a response to this interest, the master plan iden- tifies a comprehensive equestrian complex and trail system that occupies almost one -half the total parksite. It has been de- signed to function separately or in conjunction with the re- mainder of the park site. Besides equestrian use, there were other community needs iden- tified in the design development process. There is a areat demand for recreation level sportsfieids for programmed and casual softball and soccer use. Associated activities such as family and group picnicking, informal play, jogging, and childrens' play were identified as activities befitting a community park. Over half of the site has been developed to satisfy these active and passive recreation needs. Throughout the design development, functional relationships between activity areas have been developed to avoid conflicts of use, yet afford effective implementation of programming and supervis4on responsibilities. Special attention has beer given to protect and enhance the aesthetic setting while pro- viding adequate facilities. All improvements will be designed to keep maintenance and operational costs to a minimum. Lastly, we have attempted to project a creative and innovative approach throughout the design process_ CU- goal has been to provide a variety of recreation experiences in a compatible setting in a cost effective manner. We feel that this effort and goal will continue to encourage public interest and-involve- ment and thereby enhance the quality of cauriunity life associ- ated with Heritage Park. equestrian development The proposed equestrian area occupies the northeast portion of the park and is bounded on the north by Hillside Drive and an the south by the Demens Flood Control channel. Separation from the natural area to the west is provided by the Rancho Wash channel and the relatively deep natural canyon occupying the northwest corner of the park. The isolated state of this section offers a functional benefit by effectively segregating this special use from other park functions and controlling access to equestrian activities. Fortcnately, its size and C� I: IL !C E configuration matches the scope of proposed facilities. The central activity area includes a small circular arena for iongeing and individual work; a rectangular arena for dressaee> stock horse work, show warm,-up, jumping and training; and a main oval a-tzna for general riding, instruction, and horse si;tiws. The two larger arenas are separated by a coT.ron spectator area capable of serving either or both arenas. The spectator area includes ble4chers (positioned to avoid direct stir glare) and landscaped space far loimglisg and eating between activities. This area will be free-from horse traffic. The equestrian building sets the architectu-2i theme for the entire park. Patterned after the historic Virginia Dare Winery, this structure hcuses a small concession stand with a ranch kitchen to serve special events, restrooms, storage, ar �;_nouncing toter and dual entry offices to serve and observe either of the main arenas. The floor plan is typical of early Californian outbuildings, with functional spaces aligned on either sid,. of a wide central aisle that opens to lofts above. Space in the loft area is designed to accommdate meetings er social events associated with the function of the area. On the hillside north of the practice arena is a small arlea designated as an equestrian picnic area. This area .could be in tu�f and have scattered picric tables for individual family us' M J � l - � J i �ea�atlMn ........... TC, ? ! - z LL o illy_ a Ib zi III—' _ irL, li loi 0 N �l a fir: 3 II l-A I� �ol S �. ' -- I;I m CID ""151, y I :x I1� a lin 0 N n �l fir: �. i i; n E SDortSfields Two softball /Little League fields with 300' outfields and overlay soccer are located on the southern half of the site. Overlay soccer fields include a regulation size 225' x 360' field and a 200' x 300' practice field. The fields are posi- tioned tc maximize efficient use of shared lighting and rest - room /concession facilities. The sportsfield area h -.s been carEfuliy positiorfd to maintain a minimum 1% to maximum l% cross gradient for positive drainage and-playing ease. Steeper gradients are proposed once out of the field of play to -)n- form to the general 5% to 10% natural slope of the site. An alternative grading design provides for a split level ath- letic area with the western ballfield z :d soccer overlay approximately B' higher than the eastern. fields. ±his solu- tion would s`gnificantly reduce required export and allow for a balanced cut and fill operation,. Bal ?field improvements include brickdust infields with 20' high curved backstops, fenced team, dcgouts, and paved spec- tator area with bleachers. restroom /concession building Space has been allocated for a restroan! concession building to serve both sportsfields, play area, and group picnic facility. It is centrally located for maintenance ease and security surveillance. Architecture will feature early Californian rancho styling, with stucco w:.7z-,. exposed wood beams, and tine roof. The building and fixtures will be 11 designed to achieve maximum protection against vandalise. Nay areas A large creative play area is conveniently located between the group picnic and sportsfield areas, allowing supervised use by children from either activity areas. The recessed play area is defined by a wide concrete curb which contains the sand base, as well as acting as a snide now strip for maintenance ease. Walkways provide access from neighbo ing use areas and the nearby harking area. Modular play equipment includes a large arched swing set and various timber -sized play structures with slides;, ladders, clatter bridges, balance beams and lookout platforms. A terraced themed slay area is proposed ror both play and visual interest. Two half -court basketball courts are in- cluded near the play area. it smaller play area is located adjacent to the equestrian use area for children associated with this activity area. im- provements would be similar to those in the large play area, however, reduc•_d in scope. G 0 E group /family picnic areas The group picnic facilities are located between the equestrian use area and sportsfield complex for indepen- dent or associated use by park visitor:. Two group shelters allow flexible use by either one large group or two medium sized groups. Improvaments inclvide shade shelters, picnic tables (to accommodate approximately 100 persons), and barbeque and sink facilities. A large open turf area is adjacent to the group shelters for informal play. Individual picnic table and barbeques are scattered around the edge of this open play area for family use. Concrete slabs are provided under tabies to ;minimize maintenance requirements. opan play/overflow parking In addition to the group and family picnic areas, a small area at the northeast corner of the park site and adjacent to toe entrance road, is designated for open play and over- flow parking during special events or reak use periods. This area can be utilized with either the Equestrian area or the athletic /picnic facilities. parking /circulation The entrance to Heritage Park is off Beryl Sutreet towards the north end of the site. The entrance road has been .ocated to E provide convenient access to both parking areas on either side of the drainage channel, with =minimum elivision of property. The entrance drive will be accentuated with a widened road- way, 20' wide median planter, special paving, and f:ature arbor. The access drive splits and crosses the drainage channel to the north, serving the equestrian parking area, and continues to the southwest, serving the sportsfield park- ing area. The equestrian parking area is designed for horse Urailer circulation anal parking ease. There are 21 trailer pull - through spaces and 16 spaces for cars. Separate equestrian and pedestrian walks are provided whic5 cross the drainage channel and link into the park circulaticn, as well as the regional trail system. The sportsfield parking area is asphalt paved. it provides convenient access to not only the ballfields, but also the play area, group picnic facilities, and maintenance building C and yard. Ninety -nine parking spaces are provided. A wide planter helps to define circulation., parking, and provides appreciated shade from trees. An owerrFlow parking area Tor special events is proviaed at the open turf area in the r.-rtheast corner of the park site. E trails /exercise course A 15' wide dirt equestrian trail encircles the entire project site, tying into the regional 'trail system which borders Hill- side Road and Beryl Street. The trail meanders throug* the "natural area" just west of the drainage channel spur and connects into adjacent neighborhood trail heads. Two equestrian service bridges are provided that cross the drainage channels and help to complete the trail loop. A concrete post and wood rail fence is proposed to control equestrian access around the sportsfields, group and open picnic areas, and where separation from pedestrian and ve- hicle traffic is required. In the sportsfield area an exercise course parallels the riding trail for joggers' use. The 6' wide decomposed granite course is edged by concrete headers and includes 10 to 20 periodic exercise stations with equipment and related instructions. A wood fence would separate the trails. landscaping A bli >nd of open space and screen planting is used to provide adeq.,ate buffers between the equestrian area, natural area, sportsfield complex, and adjacent residences. Trpe planting and mounding is used to better define activity areas, direct circulation, and provide visual interest. Formalized and regularly ma- stained turf areas are generally contained within the trail improvements. These turf areas will have a minimum gradient of 1% for positive drainage and a maximum gradient of 5:1 for mowing ease. Trees wi11 be locate" at least 20' apart to allow efficient mowing with large gang mowers. Concrete mcw strips will be used at fences in maintained turf areas to speed mowing. The less formal landscape areas located outside the trail im- provements will be meadow -like in appearance with V -5" tail fescue and drifts of wildflowers requiring semi- annual mowing as necessary. The primary purpose of this pldnting is to con- trol erosion and dust and provide a "natural" suffer between activity areas. To Minimize maintenance requirements, plant species will be selerted for drought, disease, and pest tolerance. Trees will ;,e located to maximize shade in activity areas for park users' comfort. Every effort will be made to preserve the existing trees, particularly those located in the "natural canyon area" where grading and improvements are minimal. 11 E MI �� • H' M1 •:',n i. t , , y:r �a�\ � ��ff "'a � �t:a_ «.- t .r .ra � .. • _ ; ,, .. �� y:r �a�\ � ��ff "'a � �t:a_ «.- t .r .ra � .. • _ ; n irrigation the entire site system designed ferent types of will be selecte steeper areas. will be covered b,• to provide adenua*., landscape pla itis:g J to minimize water as automatic sprinkler irrigation for the dif- Low precipitation heads r-UntDri, particularly in Rotary -type sprinkler heads with p••.cec`+ve rubber covers will be used in the large maintained turf areas. Two inch po .n-up sprinklers are recommended for the smaller turf areas. Impact type sprinklers will be used in areas where erosion control seeding is proposed. Elevated heads shall be prr)- tected from damage cased by users or horses. Trees in the less irrigated natural seeded areas ::ill be on a su;;lemental to drip irrigation system to provide regular deep waccring and promote speedy groi th. signage A park identification sign wili be located at the entrance read median on Beryl Street. The sign will be designed to reflect the general "heritage" theme of the park. It will be lighted for night identification. Directional signs and facility identification signs will be placed where necessary to direct park users to the appropriate parking and activity areas. Cy Signs will also identify the restrorr.facilities and handi- cap parking stalls. An information kiosk will be located ,t the feature arbor for posting park activities cr special program events. theme Concept A "heritage" theme for the park site was proposed in the initial request for proposals as deveiraped by the City. The theme is intended to unify the various structures in the park and tie the development to histori•al and cultural aspects ® in Rancho Cucamonga's past. LLA Since the park site and local area were once extensively cultivated in grapes and part of the wine industry, we oecided to incorporate vineyard type eltw;ants and rancho style architecture into the "heritage" theme. The character of the equestrian center building is strongly indicatise of the "heritage" theme. The bui'Jing, patterned after the historic local Virginia Dare Winery, includes buttressed walls, arched doorwrys and windows, sculptured facade at roofiine, tower with exposed wood beams, and the roofs. An open alley runs through the buildi -;g with loft area overhead and large sliding wood Coors at either end. This adds to the intended working ranc +io character of the equestrian area. The entrarce to the parksite also reflects the rancho character, with an irrigation valve box typical of large agricultural operations, featur =d as part of the park identification sign. At the end of the patterned entrance drive. an arbur is featured with stucco columns or arches and heavy wood timbers. Climbing grapevines will be used where appro- priate. Similar structure: will be used for shade in the group picnic area. The restrcom /concession, building in the sporesfield area will be the scme style as the equestrian center building. C MENU 12 1' E•I �/ /I� � ���1♦ �� �� \r .� � + '��. : Wit(. i �,:,� ...-� �` �. -,�`! t -ji1 +'ry`� r.mot ` `� : ►,tit t t '�.•,� ►:ir���• j� '�.r �,:. � �..'/ ►t �.,.� !�! •,!i t�t ��1 rl�'♦� � \\. }3 a h• '� * 1 /� ♦rte ��- ►� ��3� ��� a� ar'ii'�y'rt�X ,tt �V N NUNN �E � `•-sr^,!_'i� `�r�` •_,��'1? a mow. �; � a �Y Yid• C - r �.a l � r 1 I � � .. � ... J , s` •fir j+�,s � - :. passible environmental impacts This preliminary evaluation of environmental conditions and possible impacts has been made without the benefit of thor- ough -cientific assessments or testing techniques. These preliminary findings are based on visual inspection of the site; comparison with similar projects; and a working know- ledge of the EIR process. The primary intent is to identify critical impacts early in the design program so that solutions reflect both environmental concerns and functional criteria. ae.c }hetics The ttansition from vacant land to high quality landscari�ng and providing amenities not yet present in the community is direct, major, and extremely beneficial. The proposed park will contribute to the recreational, social, and aest',atic character of the Rancho Cucamonga area as a whole, at._' will substantially improve the aesthetic quality of the immediate neighborhood. A tone and an identity to the surrou:sding resi- dential areas will develop with the park. noise Negative impacts are minimal. Curing construction, there may be significant, though temporary, increases in noise levels. The new function projected for this site of providing recrea- tion facilities will have a permanent impact on the noise level. However, major slopes adjacent to the equestrian and sp.rtsfieid areas will significantly reduce noise impacts, by acting as an acoustical shield, particularly when planted. A E I � y E 11 DATE: TO: FROM- BY: �'Auc;ust 23, Members of the Planning Commission CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM t - 1933 Michael Vairin, Senior Planner Dan Coleman, Associate Planner :V 0 SUBJECT: DRAFT DEVELOpMERT CODE ABSOLUTE POLICIES p�.-tL4 Please rind enclosed a copy of Section A.9, Absolute Policies, to be inserted at the end of Chapter 4, Res ;3ential Districts. This is a first draft of po?icies satisfy proposed ras proval can be granted. each The residential project must satisfy b_ e d approval Absolute policies, togener with the development standards and design guidelines, will comprise a three -fold seL of review criteria that will b s•s for the residertiallgrowch management review process. form the a The Absolute pclisoci have Jithenesidentiald developrPntsas expressed in critical issu ?s asso iated the City's Growth Management sysublicrdfaciilitiesal and Plan: services, and compatibility, au2quac-. of p protection sewer a letter' requirements wi 11 be added to these. school letter In a and rapidly growing community such as Rancho Cucamonga, it is critical to Lave a ew of 'reseidentialldevelopmentr proposalconsistent as swell as day-to-day to day the review of decisions. behind the The attached memo describes in more management review pro ess. ybsolute policies and the residential/growth Mv:DC:jr Attachment CC; City Council 8 City Manager Department Heads Planning Staff Parks Committee Citizens Advisory Commission Section 4.9 Absolute Policies The Absolute Policies are intended to address the most cri cal issuus a s with residential development. The includub li neighborhood compatibility, compiiapee with adopted plans, adequacy of p facilities and services, and protection of the public environment and public health. Each project must satisfy all absolute policies before approval can be granted. A. Plans & Policies 1. P:oject is consistent with the adopted Plans. Plats, Land use Pian, Develo p ment Code, and all applicable 2. Project is consistent with the adopted Master Plan of Trails. 3. Project is consistent with the adopted Parks and Recreation Plan. 4. Project is consistent with the adopted Circulation Plan. 73. Neighborhood Compatibility 1. Project is compatible with and sensitive to the immediate environment of the site and neighborhood relative to arc`sitectural design; scale, bulk and auilding height; identity and neighborhood character; building orientation and setback; grading; and visual integrity. 2. The conflicts that are presumed to exist between the proposed o ^Land t and surrounding land uses as described in Table 4.9-F pertaining Is Conflicts", have been effectively mitigated in the project design. 3. significant adverse impact on surrounding development. crated does n ,t have C. Public Facilities do Services 1. Project includes street improvements and wiillegenerate efined is volumes resulting in a service level equal percent johime to capacity ratio by tl a DK8 traffic study)- ;; Project provides adequate access for emergency vehicles• 3. Project provides storm drainsta steerupllan a � fatties or sppecial drainage facilities necessary or alleviate grading constraints. 4. Project provides both for and off -site maintenance. s and/or Maintenance District to 5. Project conforms to the access control policies of the General Plan regarding arterials. S. Project provides local feeder trials and community trails as required by the General Plan. 88 -1 D. Public Health. be Safety Project lies within, or partially within, an adopted 'Special Studies Zone" and a geologic report has been submitted which iorates the presence or absence of actual fault traces in accoftiance with the provisions of the Mquist -PrWo Act. 2. Project lies wit7ir. areas subject to geolcgic hazards (i.e., slopes greater than 40 %, slope instability, soil erosion, grour.4 failure), as identified in Figures V -2 and V -3 of the General Plan; an adequate geologic or soils engineering investigation has been submitted, and special engineering precautions have been taken to overcome those limitations or these areas have beer. set aside from development. 3. Project is located with °.n a flood hazard area, as identified in Figure V -5 of the General Plan, and special construction features have been incorporated into the design of structures. 4. Project is located within a fire hazard area, as identified in Figure V -5 of the General Plan; a program for interim fuel management has been included to reduce the risk of fire, and fire mitigation measures (e g., file reswtent building materials, site design which enhances fire access, etc.) have been incorporated into the project design. E. Resource Protection 1. Project contains landfor ms of citywide significance (i.e., foothills defined as having slopes greater than 10 %, and Red Elil) and the project has been designed to minimize alteration of the landform through p.oper site Is planning, clustering, and following natural contours. 2. Project is located within a major groundwater recharge area, as identified in Figure IV -2 of the General Plan, and development has been clustered to promote infiltration and to maintain open space. 3. Project contains streamside woodland associations, identified as a significant natural resource in Figure N -2 of the General Plan, and site investigations have been completed, aad mitigation measures proposed (inci 3ding clustering) to mitigate impacts upon riparian community. 4. Froject is located on a site or contains a structure or other feature which i.- designated as a historic landmark, and provision has been utade for preservation of said landmark in accordance -with the Historic Preservation Ordinance. 5. Project site is designated by the General Plan as Hillside Residential, and environmental studies have been conducted to determine land holding capacity and site development constraints, and the proposed density is no greater than two units per net buildable acre. 6. Project site is designated by the General Plan as Open Space, and development has been concentrated to preserve open space, and the proposed density is no greater than an average density of one ;;sit per net buildable 10 acres. 88 -2 LJ 11 7. Project promoies energy efficiency through the use of energy efficient building design (e.o,, south facing windows, energy conserving, building materials and appliances, ete.) snd site planning (e g., east -west aligned units, landscapsr - .. -ilar access, etc.). F. Land Use Conflicts The matrix in Table 4.9-F indicates the conflicts that are presumed to exist between ]and uses. The types of mitigation measures listed in the following sections are the design tools that should be employed either separately cr. in combination to mitigate existing or potential land use conflicts. The Absolute r3lieies rewire that such conflicts be effectively mitigated in the project design as a condition for approval of the development plan. 1. Land Use Conflict Mitigation Measures (a) peen Space Setbaeks- By providing an open spaca buffer between conflicting Ian(' uses conflicts can often be avoided. The width of the buffer .required will depend on the severity of conflict and the extent of landscaping. To wort; effecti °ely, the ownership, use, and maintenance of the open space buffer must be clearly defined. (b) Landsc it -sr and Topogra;:hic Cam• As part of an open space buffer cr as a treatment of land immediately adjacent to buildings, landscaping can be used to reduce conflicts. 1. Dense plantirgs of evergreens can provide a visual buffer. ?.. 'Sensitive landscaping can soften the sharp vi;::_t contrast between two abutting isnd uses by subduing the differences :a architecture and bulk and by providing a gradual transition rather I-han a hxi sh edge between uses. 3. Dense growth of plants can be visually appealing t11t also can be used to discourage unwen -t -d and unsafe pedestrian or bicycle access between lan9 uses. s. Landscaping can be used in combination with other mitigation measures, such as reducing the width of open space buffer required and softer the visual conflict created by safety and security fences. g, gecontouring of the reduce glare, cha_9e pedestrian travel. 88 -3 land can alter views, subdue sounds, the sense of proximity, and channel (c) ©rantation. The strict spatial proximity between land uses and the apparent or functional proximiiy can be very different depending on the orientation of building- and activi ?es in the two land uses. 1. The buildings themselves can cause a buffer to be created by effectively turning their backs on each other — orienting views, access and priniepal ectivities away from the other lard use, Care must be taken, however, that a hazardous and unaesthetic "no -mans" land is not created in the process. 2. Alternately, the intervening space can be eliminated altogether if the two buildings share a common back wall. 3. ?a. entire situ plan car. be oriented so that the ectivities and functions are aligne2 h.erar6dcaiiv — V.h.::i.a least compatible furthest from the commorf `a=ndary between land uses and- lose most com —Ryie near that eounaary O,e., S -.ngie story adjacent to single s: teril. (d) Barriers and Alle .'ation. It may be appr: priate 2nd aecessary to use physical barriers to prevent tie dcsiraoie attributes of o,7e la :c. us�: from affe^_tiag the peopte and actin -hies in the hdjacent_ land use. 1. Fences, walls and berms can prevct.t the passages cf pt-ople :41ts areas that would be unsa:_ or insecure. 2. Light and noise can also be mitigated through physical barriers such as fences, walls, berms, screens and landscapiR:, (e) ArchiZZctural Compatibility. In addition to the architectural considerations involved in mitigation through orientation, th> architectural design of buildings can reduce conflict and promote compatibility. Materials, colors, scale, and prominence of buildings in adjacent land uses ca,2 he coordinated so there is a gradual transition from one land use to another ruiner •har. a sharp and displeasing contrast. Fumiy aesthetic ceiai that are "tacked" onto a building to cover up land use conlicts, however, will cause more harm than. goo-J. 2. The architectural compatibility sh -cold rise from a total consideration of the function of each land use and the function of the space between them. ;f) Circulation. Streets and parking areas can often serve to reduce Tort niaTtypes of land use conflicts. Separation of conflicting uses with a street or parking area can provide a buffer. 11 88 -4