Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1984/02/08 - Agenda Packet
; i': . `�: �; t �, • ,, -.�, ,;, ` ��� . �; ���,=. _,. :' �;5� �� � _ . :::,: '..,. :e f .;'.;. _ �+` .'s-_ -, ::. Q . _ ,.. - � CM OF {":-�' ' • RANCHO CL;CMNIONG.a Y A TT C©iV11� 1S51OT Ij>> ID77 LIONS PARK COMMUNITY CENTER ACTIONS 9161 BASE LINE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA WEDNESDAY Febr=T 8, 1934 7:00 p.m. L. Pledge of Allegiance II. Roll Call Commissioner Barker X* Commissioner Bempel X Commissioner Juarez X Commissioner Stout X Commissioner McNiel X *arrived at 7:53 p.ni. III. Annomeements rr. Consent Calendar } The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversiaL They will be acted on by the Commission at r; one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. Items A, B, 0 A. TRACT 9321 - C/L BUILDERS - Request for approval of a Approved 4-0-1 new architectural product type, located west of Sapphire and Highland, on Carol Avenue. B. TIME EXTENSION - PARCEL MAP 6636 - BUTLER -Located on the west side of Hellman, south of Sth Street. Approved 4-0-1 with C. TIME EXTENSION - PARCEL MAP 7061-4 - KAISER extension for 18 DEVELOPMENT - Located at the southeast corner of 6th months rather than Street and Milliken Avenue. 12. Applicant to be advised that this is D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT s^ ad last extension. REVIEW 83-43 - MESSCNGER -The development of a 201,000 sq. ft. wEe-house/distribution building on 9.9 acres of land in the General Industrial category (Subarea 8) located north of Arrow and east of Elm Avenue - Parcels 2 do 3 of Parcel Map 7244. w e PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA February 8, 1984 Page 2 V. Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinicn of the related project Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All sucks opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Continued to 3/14/84 E. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 84-01 A AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 84-02 - OLYMPUS PACIFIC - A request to amend the General Plan Land Use Map from Office to Low ,Medium ,Residential (4-8 du/ac) and a Development District amendment to change the Development Districts Map from OP to LM, all on 4.36 acres located on the northeast corner of 19th Street and Hermosa Avenue APN 202-191-13. (Continued from meeting of January 25, 1984.) Withdrawn by F. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 84-01 B - LINCOLN applicant PROPERTIES - A request to amend the General Plan Land Use Map from Office to Medium-High Residential (14-24 du%ac) on 3.67 acres located on the northwest corner of 19th Street and Archibald Avenue - APN 202-101-21. (Continued from meeting of January 25, 1984.) Continued to 3/14/84 G. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 84-01 C - ACACLA - A request to amend the General Plan Land Use Map from Office to Medium-High Residential (14-24 du/ac) on 3.58 acres located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, approximately 500 feet north of Base Line - APN 201-151-33. (Continued from meeting of January 25, 1984.) Approved 4-0-1 with H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT reqmt for heavy shing. 12601 - MORRIS & SEARLES - The development of 25 single roofing mtl . subject Taimily detached homes on 4.5 acres of land in the Low to planning approval . Medium (LM) District generally located on the west side of Turner Avenue at Palo Alto Street - APN 1077-031-4. Approved 4-0-1 I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8298 - MORRLS & SSEARLES - The division of 9.22 acres of land into two parcels within the Low Medium (LM) District, generally located on the Wrest side of Turner Avenue at Palo Alto Street - APN 1077-031-4. Approved 4-0-1 J. TENTATIVE TRACT 11915-1. -2, -3 - CROWELL -A revision to the Tentative Tract Map to a 3 lot subdivision for condominium purposes for 150 dwellings on 10.69 acres of land located at the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Turner Avenue - APN 209-091-11. ;4 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA February 8, 1984 Page 3 Approved 4-0-1 K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8345 - SERO AMUSEMENT COMPANY - A division of 40.35 acres into 2 parcels in the Medium high Residential and Office/Professio:ial. districts located on the northwest corner of Haven Avenue and Arrow Highway - APN 208-341-01-04. VI. New Busies Approved 4-1-0 L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT Cornissiorer Rempel REVIEW 83-42 - GALVIS - The conversion of an existing gas voted No. service station into a se -service station and mini-market in the General Commercial District located at 8166 Foothill Boulevard - APN 207-112-17. 'VIL Public Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. Vffi. Adjournment 8 p.m. The Plannina Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shaII be heard only with the consent of the Commission. %i ViCINITlf' MAP ri • r • 0 ` COLLECT COLIEOE • : "° 6wwn yN^ � d • .� �L•O•/ iIq[ MITT Mlll • • 4�e� 1 I �� • Y W o m� ) c j� IM • _ s 3 f z CUC•NONGI-GOISTI COUNT• .EOIO.It .I.. / O•TI.10 I•TE••ITIO.IL I.•Ip,r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONC,q `oC'C.A.tirnle �\' CITY OF •— ` ,, �: Rk\CHO CL;G-\%lONGA PLA2NV l�lTINLs CGN'L'�I15S1G '4 I►z 1GENTDA L! ly 1977 LIONS PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA WEDNESDAY February 8, 1984 7:00 p.m. L Pledge of Allegiance II. Roll Call Commissioner Barker_ Commissioner Rempel Commissioner Juarez Commissioner Stout Commissioner McNiel III. Annotmeements IV. Gxtsent Calendar The following Conspnt Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversiaL They will be acted on by the Commission at one time wit'-nut discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion.. A. TRACT 9321' - C/L BUILDERS - Request for approval of a new archite-z!tural product type, located west of Sapphire and Highland, o i Carol Avenue. B. TIME EXTi SIO1; - ^ARCEL MAP 6636 - BUTLER - Located on the west side c` Hellman, south of 9th Street. C. TIME EXTENSION - PARCEL MAP 7061-4 - KAISER DEVZ1,OPMENT - Located at the southeast corner of 6th Streit and Milliken Avenue. D. ENVIRCNMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEFV 83-43 - MESSENGER - The development of a 201,000 sq. ftw warehouse distribution building on 9.9 acres of land in the General Industrial category (Subarea 8) located north of Arrow and east of Elm Avenue - Parcels 2 & 3 of Parcel Map 7244. Z. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA February 8, 1984 Page 2 V. Publie Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by staling your name and address. .'-It such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. £ oK-u A A: DGENERF,L PLAN AM DEVEL0P3'.ENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 84-02 - OLYMPUS PACIFIC - A request to amend the General Plan Land Use Mafrrom Office to Low Medium Residential (4-8 du/ac) and a Development District amendment to change the Development Districts Map from OP to LM, all on 4.36 acres located on the northeast corner of 19th Street and Hermosa Avenue - APN 202-191-13. (Continued from meeting of January 25, 1984.) F. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 84-01 B - LINCOLN PROPERTIES - A request to amend the General Plan Land Use Map from Office to Medium-High Residential (14-24 du/ac) on 3.67 acres located on the northwest corner of 19th Street and Archibald Avenue - APN 202-101-21. (Continued from meeting of January 25, 1984.) G. GENERAL PLAN A.VIENDMENT 84-01 C - ACACLA - A request to amend the General Plan Land Use Map Irorn Office to Medium-High Residential (14-24 du/ac) on 3.58 acres located or the west side of Archibald Avenue, approximately 500 feei north of Base Line - APN 201-151-33. (Continued from meeting of January 25, 1984.) H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12601 - MORRIS & SEARLES - The development of 26 single smily detached homes on 4.5 acres of land in the Low Medium (LM) District generally located on the west side of Turner Avenue at Palo Alto Street - APN 1077-031-4. I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMEP:1 :ND PARCEL MAP 8298 - MORRIS & SEARLES - The dii ision of 9.22 acres of land into two parcels within the Low Medium. (LM) District, generally located on the west side of Turner Avenue at Palo Alto Street - APN 1077-031-4. J. TENTATIVE TRACT 11915-1 -2. -3 - CROWELL - A revision to the Tentative Tract Map to a lgt subdivision for condominium purposes for 150 dwellings on 10,69 acres of land located at the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Turner Avenue - APN 209-091-11. ' PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA February 8, 1984 Paqe 3 K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 9345 - SERO AMUSEMENT COMPANY - A division of 40.35 acres into 2 parcels in the Medium High Residential and Office/Professional districts located on the northwest corner of Haven Avenue and Arrow Iiighway - APiv 208-341-01-04. VL New Business L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 83-42 - GALVIS - The conversion of an existing gas service station into a self-service station and mini-market in the General Commercial District located at 8166 Foothill bouicvn:� - PAN 207-112-17. VIL Public Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. VUL Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations ,i that set an 11 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. L 1 }KC f 'VICINITY MAP � i i • i • • � f , WIYIy Ixl.wl. �'.tIM.•(,I IMGxM11L r1M4{ CHAFFLY i•••• COLLEGE. � u� � �. • i�e1Nq f..w1"f � _ �_ y E e • v�i E • � • f G Iy �LIOx V•:� CITT•HALL PLC v • s • � s v e v o I. Feeeu; � • • c• rn� ® OT a -i-- em a = • CYCuOxG• OLI•Sft COUNT♦ xE010.AL x•ww ONTA•IO INiEROIArIONAL Al"on T' CITY OF RANCHO COCAIWON" i CITY OF RANCHO CliCA`IONGA G�ca:tilri STAFF REPORT I ' ,4 r- ��ti RJR 1� DATE Februa- -13T 1077 I TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Frank Dreckman, Assistant Planner �ff SUBJECT: TRACT 9321 - C/L BUILDERS - Request for approval of a new I architectural product type located west of- Sapphire and Highland on Carol Avenue. BACKGROUND: C/L Builders are requesting architectural approval for a previously approved single family residential tract located west of Sapphire and Highland on Carol Avenue. This tract was previously undevelopable due to flood control susceptibility from the Cucamonga Creek' Chanrel ; however, this pfoLlem ihas recently been mitigated due to channelization of the creek. The Design. Review Committee has determined i that the architectural design adequately conforms to the basic_ design stancards of the City and recommended approval . The approval shall be subject to an upgrading of asphalt shingles and a variable color palette to be approved by staff prior to issuance of building permits. RECOMMEN^.ATION: The Design Review Committee found that the new architectural product for Tract 9321 will be compatible with surrounding residential lard uses and recommends approval based upon the use of upgraded asphalt shingles and approved color palette. Rey ectfull submitted, ovy�=:s�.acses'° I ick Gomere City Planner RG/jr Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Plan. Exhibit "B, B-1, B-2" - Proposed Elevation �— ITEN A 4 { 111 q t? � \V � w �fyf� Fy �• - - ------------ HtGns.L-vc If JL ♦ •A � II f , � ' ,;�I��� ���✓ 1�I�� ICI, �� lair-- .:.,,' — — :!�L_�'�✓ �� � 'I� �i - �i .� - �I .,.jl - - :1 �1 FS CITY OF ��.o�;XT�- m � . RANCHO CUC ' �1 PLANNING DIVISONI L\I 11BIT: _� SCALE: _ — 3 — i,r.wT 1 71i -FT Mi 13 E, If I Ell 11 DII . 2 la rM� � S.^•�..1T Gi M1rs. Eli - 1+�^ /� -• `•i.a�••pid a�i JLVim �-'�aR1Y faCn.y • 1 '^�l� � L un•cr*Ori®Y�e.n]Oa?+em m a.a.L'yCl�l NORTH CI r r CUCAA A TITLES PLANNING DI -61ON Al II1i1T: �SCALE: _ [i.Twscw .—_ � � -• Cb.-1 -7 Os CLLLyI .^•ro• Dct l 1 _ . Fl F'�` CI Y OF ITEM. -RA CHO CUCANIONG TITLE-�C�val c2n5 EXI JISIT: SC;�LE: CITY OF RANCHO CUC 110\GA ooJC�Arol ' DATE: February 8, 1984 10: Planning Cummissicn i FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician f SUBJECT: Th;E EXTENSION - PARCEL MAP 6636 - SUTLER - Located on the west side of Hellman, south of 9th Street j I Dewain Butler has submitted a reC!uest to extend tentative approval time for Parcel map 6636 due to the current economic conditions. Parcel Map 6636 was tentatively approved for the divsion of 6.09 acres of land into 2 parcels for industrial use of January 28, 1981. A six-month Extension was aranted by the Planning Commission on July 14, 1982 extending approval to January 28, 1983. An additional one-year extension was granted extending approval to January 28, 198a. i This project is located within the General industrial Area and conforms with the Industrial Specific Plan, Subarea 2. The staff report and minutes of the January 23, 1981 imeeting are attached for your review. A 6-month extension at this tire wou'id result in total project time of 3 1J2 years. No additional extensions could be granted. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Planning Commission grant a 6-month extension for this project. The new expiration date will be July 28, 1984. ! `es?ectfully submitted, LBHc-Ek as Attachments I I� �— ITEM B Dewain R. Butler January 13, 1984 } Mr. Paul A. ROnp--au Senior Civil Engineer . City of Rancho Cucaronga 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C ?,0, Box 807 Rancho Ct:camonga, CA 91730 Re: Tire Extension for ?--reel Ma➢ 6636 Dear ?;r. Rougeau: I find it necessary to file a time extension request for the project listed above due to current economic_ conditions. Enclosed is my check in the amount of $62.00. Thank you for ;our cooperation and assistance in this ratter. Sincerely, dv Dewain R. Butler DRE mp Enclosure: Check 4:2699 3300 1vnne Avenue, Sui,e 385. Nevraorz Beach. CA 92660 714-662-0221 CITE' 0- RA�CI i0 C�'G_ .IO\G:� Gi.c_�.v�c STA�Fh REPORT Z 1 DATE: January 22, 1961 `9" j TO: Planning Commission FRO": Lloyd S_ Hubbs, City Engineer SU°JECT: EENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL !''AP 6030 - Stevens, Trustee �i ri subgivlsion of b.Uy acres in Z parcels Tor indus-criai ioca_ed on the west side of Hellman, south of 9th Street. I"TRODUCTION: This subdivision will provide two parcels of Industrial land of about 3 acres each. Parcel 1 is proposed for immediate development under Director Review on this evening's agenda. ;his parcel n•?p is being submitted inorder to permit the development of the Hellman Ave. frontage without the necessity of dedication and improvement t, of the extension of Lion St. It is anticipated that this extension :,ill be needed for future circulation in the area as shown on the attached area map. If a large project to the south of this tentative map should change the desired circulation pattern, then it is possible that Lion St. could be ended in a cul -de-sac. Since future needs are in such doubt, it is felt that potential buyers of Parcel 2 should be put on notice that a s meet extension is likely upon further subdivision or development. This could best be accomplished by an offer of dedication. Drainage for this property will be provided per Engineering Conditions for the tentative map and the Director Review and by existing easements. The property is bounded on the north by four parcels, three of which are developed, and on the south,east and west by vacant land. The entire area is zoned and planned for industrial use. E!1VIRTN71ENTAL ANALYSIS: Also attached for your review and consideration is Part I of the Initiai Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed 1 Part Ii of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Upon completion and review of the Initial Study and field investigation. Staff round no significant adverse impacts on the envi-ronment as a result of the rroposed subdivision. III RECO;P,1ENDATION: It is reco, mended that the tentative map be approved , subject LO the (t Engineer' s Report, and that a Negative Declaration be issued. A i resolution is attached to provide for approval should the Co=,ission concur. I i Respectfully submitted, LSH:PA .jaa Attachments _' R E S 0 LU7 I0N N 0. 31-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCA?MONGA PLANNING .r.�':' iSU1�1 APpgn•.;T'ln TCn�T,^,TT �C D?Drc .inn n c � . rnr irJ. UU30 :4HEREAS, on December 10, 1930, a formal application was submitted requesting review; of the above-described tentative map ; and I•lHEREAS, on January 28, 1981, the Planning Co7mission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above described rap. NOW, THEREFORE, THE Rfi"CHO CUCAPIONGA PLAi,NING COI'MISS ON RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTIOi 1: Ihat the follo:•;ing findings have bee:. made: 1. That the map is consistent :•pith the proposed General Plan. 2. That the imprcvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 3. That the site is phvsically suitable for the proposed developm.ent. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting, property. SE0110'i 2: That this project will nog create significant adverse environmental impacts and Negative Ceclaration is issued on January 28, 1901. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 6636 is approved subject to the conditions of the City Engineer' s Report pertaining thereto. APPROVED '.ND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JANLIARY, 1931. PLANNING CO"MISSI01-7 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.NV;GA 2Y: Richard Dan- , C i -mdn Secretary oT the Fianning Co. mission I , JACK LA.%1, Secretary of the Planning CO=—issicr, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning ! Commission held on the 23th day of January, 1931, by the following vote 1 t0 wit: I —9 — Page 2 AYES: CO"MISSIO HERS: io, stoy, Sceranka , 'King, Re:,pel , Dohi ;"CH : COM.M.ISSIONERS: ;;one "SE::T: COM','.ISSIONFRS: None k yM1' rt, t"- CITY OF RA:C O CUCA7011GA CI T'f Ei.rEEL._cR S RE?0RT FILED P- Stevens . Truste- TE;ITATI'.'•E PIAP NO. 6636 _ C. T:C';: !•)/C of ?ollm;an. Sin oth St. DATE FILED: 12/10/80 i7U}1"ER OF LOTS : 2 ! _E�AL DESCRI?TIC;:: portion of Lot 7 as per mao RECEIPT MCd'7ER: 0 950 3 of Subdivision of Lpt_?_CCucamonaa Vinevard FEE: C9;(l n1 Tra^t as recorded in Book 20 Pane e". ZO%E M-R indu.striP_1 P PRE?;;RED BY: Geor.^e 11if" ack GROSS 6 .09 - AJO__ r.;,,, ES.,-„�: 21 - South FU r' id I've- LICT AREA: Ontario, CA 91761 iti';I';L';1 LOT FROIIT"E: - ^D ADDRESS P;i0'1E ^.ichard P.—Stevens. Trustee 15202 Dov.nev Ave- 213/63--3330 Parmount, CA RP l Or' THE CITY EdGINEER Dedications v 1 . Dedication. 3y final map of a%�XvfX' 71�kXXY" \kl'sjr.�XXWR; zTXa3 all necessary easements as sho:•;^ on the tentative map, or as required by the City Engineer" 2. Dedication by final map of the following missing rights-of-way on the following streets: _ additional feet on additional feet on additional feet on _ Corner P/L radius requirea on Ct:�er 3. Rignts of vehicular access shal i e l ii,nted a l �s on Parczl 1 one Doint of access Der Planning Commission Resolution 72,-29. Street vacat,on requires for: luster Plan of Streets YevisTan re^uireO_ t0!-- 5. The following perir!eter intersections require r•ealignmer.t as follows: X 6a. An offer of dedication for Lion St. is required. RCE 20 —� Ic.:iAIiVE 0. EC^5 Page 2 Im--ovements (Bonding is required prior to ❑ Recording for ) ct!Building permit for carce'.sl ?, 2 ) X 7. Construct -Full street improvements (including curb and gutter, A.C . pavement, sidewalk, one drive approach per lot, park:iay trees and street lights) on all interior streets when such street dedications are accepted upon development. �r $. Construct the following missing improvements on the following Streets : *in_cludlnq landscaping and irrigation on meter CURB & I A.C. I SIDE-I DRI:'E I STREET STREET "EDIAN 1 ST _T it GUTTER PV'rT I WALK A?PR RE c rr r ' rq I T E L. H7S II 1SLA?:�* 0TH Pa I I^a 1 repair I i X I X X I X i I I Y 9. Construct all storm drain and drainage structures as sho::n on the tentative map, or as required by the City Engineer. v 10. Provide all utility services to each lot including sanitary setters , rater, electric power, gas, telephone and cable television .conduit. All utilities are to be underground. ® Y 11 . Developer shall coordinate, and w^ere necessary, pay for the relec=__ion of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. 12. Install appropriate Street name signs and traffic control sign, v'. th loca- Lions and types approved by the City Engineer. '__ 13. Developer is t0 provide all construction plans for drainage and Street provements. Sucn plans shall meet approval of the City Engineer. 1,_ 1I Sanitary sewer and :cater systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Eater District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. x 15. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall be decorative poles with underground service. lo. The following existing streets being torn, up by new services ::ill require an A.C. overlay: _ 17. The fo icwing specific dimensions, i .e. , cui-de-sac racius, street sect:cn widths) are not approved: h 13. The following existing streets are substancard : They will require: Approvals ai:�J Fees 19. This subdivision shall be subject to cgr.ditions of approval from CA'_T^;iiS / San Bernardino County Mood Control District. X 20. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agen- cies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received From the-, --sa — RCE 20 t - TENTATIVE Page� 7 23 . Per—itS from other arpncinC ,.rill bC __ Cq ut 'i cu a� f0110:':s: A. Caltrans, for: = B. City: _ C. County Gust Abatement District: D. D. I.S. Trenching Permit if any trenches are over 5 ' deep: X E. Cucamonga County :dater District: F. Other: !a� Control _ '2 If only a portion Of s vide for two-way traffic and rparking gone all aaffected�streets. s shall be made to pro- _ 23. The following lots appear to be substandard in either frontage, depth or area and should be corrected on the final map: _ 24. All corner lots shall have a corner radius at the right-o jay line in accora- ance with the City of P,ancho Cucamonga _ 2Sz. A Parcel r1a p P shall be recorded r- o standards. heirs the creation of an unrecognizedparrcellocatedt phase subdivision to prevent _ 26. The bout:dart' of the Tentative clap reeds clarification as fo] lo.�s: _ 27. The border shall be shoo-in to centeriine of existing peri;ne-ter streets , or title explanation required. Parcel Flap '!giver 22. Information submitted at the time of applicati, is / is net sufficient to support the issuance of a waiver of Parcel reap Certificate, according to requirements of the State !.lap Act and local ordinances. F3eod Control (Bonding is required prior to ❑ Recording for : ' Eui1ding permit far _ 29. Proposed subdivision falls within those areas indicated as subject to flood- ing under the F;ational Flood Insurance Program. This subdivision will be subject to the provisions of that program and Ordinance No. 24. 3O. A drainage channel and/or flood protection hall along the entire north pro- perty line may be required to divert sheet runoff to streets. Such floc: may be required to go under sider:alks through culverts. _ 3I . i vial ter sur is above top of curb, 00" r:alls shall be required at Lhe back of the Sidewalk at all do.instrea:, curb returns. _ 3Z Culverts required to be constructed across streets at following locations: Li Ord SCai ; hydr01Cj7C St;:dI S L•rli bC rC:Ulr(:Q tC dSScSS 7Ci0aC` OT lilCrea`ed rUnCif. r RCE 20 TENTATIVE ;IAP NO. 6636 Pace 4 11iscellaneous 35. Dust abatement will be made a condition of issuance of the grading permit fe,- this project. ?6. Noise impact on this pr_ ect Till be mitigated in accordance with the Pla,ming Division report on subject property. 37 . This property is not within the present City Bounda•r;, and will require annexation. 33. All information required to be shown on the tentative map is not shown as re- quired: v 39. Proper grading and erosion control , including the preventation of sedimenta- ' tion or damage to offsite property shall be prcvided for as required. _ 40. A preliminary soils report will not be required for this site for .the follow- ing reasons: A copy of the soils report furnished to the Buildinq Division prior to grading will be furnished to the Engineering Division. v 41 . The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. When building permits are requested , the Cur_amonga County !-later Dist-ict brill be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. x 42. :he City Engineer shall make the determination, in accordance with Section 6643G(C)(1 ) of the Subdivision flap Act, that division and development of the property will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise cf any public entity or public utility right-of-,:ray or easement and the signa- ture of any such public entity or public utility may be omitted from the final map unless the City is notified in writing of any objection to said determina- tion within the specified time limits of said Section. At the time of Final flap submittal , the following shall be submitted: Traverse calculations (sheets) , copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and/ or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. _ » Development shall be limited to one drive approach per street. Multiple lots fronting on a single street shall use common drive approaches at lot lines. _ 45. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drain- age entering the property from adjacent areas. X 46. An easement for emergency access across Parcel No. 2 from Lion St. to Parcel No. 1 shall be delineated on the Parcel Map. CITY OF RX!CHO CUCA'-10NGA LLOYD B. HUSSS CIIY E7:GI:7EER q By: �1 t G�11ou�PGL�- P.CE 20 I.. .� •yam 11 � ,= I I• i i � i N LION _=y 57AEE7' ki r fJa. [ 1'Y n L m �: ?= Ail � GJ L I �y •4 � f � II,.�H[LLY1N a' T 7 �J V v � j I alv D.I j 'I I I I I f I t l HELLJ".AN AVE P-i.�6. 47/4 3Yr.2CELS ul t I mA � 1I } -ry .a•rC j„i�.. : r.o _crther co-,^•;at for or pro ect, the bl • puic i:oari•:g cicsOu. "otion: 3c:mpO3.. seconced TOL;te•:, carried cnnni.c.ecsl to >1np .co. 65 i7 and SESS:•._..T AND PARCEL Mv'-P S0. 6636 - S'"F':--'CS nd str'n'_ suudivisio❑ of G.09 acre a cone i s into l..,rcc_s »stir the ?.-h ocnted on the west side cf i:elimzn Avenue, 433 feet T sotah of r 9th Steet• (AP-, 209-013-20 - I. .L ANT) r �n Ll Lc or. RH IEE: ':o. �l-n� _ T_:. ,. Inc, construction T^C .m total; ^• ;o .'1' of tour ( ) ,ncustrinl builds. s >' square feet on G.17 acres of land in the M-R zone located at 8787 lieilman Avenue. (,;??; ?19_011-' 3) ML. Paul i2ou^oau, Senor Civil Ea„freer, rc :iewed the staff report, r t^. note was to be added to tile s_atin,, C' t"-, Prior CO 'rlitOr-aLt On that would SS: t}:at :Llture extension Of L1Cn Str CCC "la_C be teens red.stntod, no futt or dedi.catior. 'could nc p.ee That way, he cod or the p,tees a^ p r fo parcel the extension of Lion Street. ... C -i::::ionor Ta1StOf asked if what ??r. Rou^eau c:as:; ..avin^ :ass that parcel ' :n ^Ou1u be proved witi:eut tension of Lion Str eet and then parcel loped, would beart're cost Of i:O r. ?rovc.r..ents at a later Ti:is would have to come 'Oe'Ore the CQMM'_SSiln .or their approval. repliG•1 that this would happen in an, even t.�- Fur ther, that aa c�.•vclop'c'nt of Parce_ No. 2 :rould I:aVQ to ccr.:c bufor,, staff:O CC:]:misslJn prior to devolopnent. and 1-am- stated that of the two ways that f .: s^ con b^ done, the Offer o .,dication is the strop er. The ofc cYl thu Other a . or is Obtained up front whereas, condition, it is set , On wnici] di ., £or:. _rd. He furta,_r added that depending rectio., the Planning Con:-mission t✓iShed ti:eir seluction of one over the per. o�: to 90 tileY could make . "'r- Fo`l�;°au advised that one op tion would ould in•Ol prob '. e possible i.ems for tr.e City is file future. If the develoa-ent occurs on the lar-e parcel to the south it would preclude the tvn u`, ad , O of circulatson that they ervisioc.. ded that the nap that was attached to the staff report shows onepossible concept of tl:e circulation in the area. Od is coo ascu:,2 that Lio❑ tcOt •::ill L-c c�;t --ndrd, .:ill. the cc ... . a n� ro. C:r..�:i:::;ion,•r Si a:;i:cd i.: that •,:a; oncu'=}i to do thin�ts wits,. ?tannin CO-Mission THnvtes :fr. :.au�eau re-,1ied t::at wcuir', ^lend is .:...Sc to . ...___,___ .. .�•, � ._� a, � uLi is L:.c :-.v_< t:: IC .:;ts CO oe nCCeG +.:Jllld ::^Aea2 -.0. 'dou'L! f)C n0 CG:'i_1015•'_ JC e en...:.7 r:, that _❑e•'i:-is - li-e"lCnt for Z:IIe,C.`:t ...^,lOn :?S LiO: S tree: . C Zo77=.csi.0:,Cr SCeranka state_ t417 - .. h8 dial nOC ^.Oti.._ .. -.Cqu_rccm :,t for an . 7.,urtc•na..1- to P:.rcei ':o. 1. .._ . ?o^an replied that it is not S7.,ecifically stated, but on pa e 1 there a requ'rament by the Ci:_: Engineer that could be used to achieve •.CCCssa r.• Case.^..Cuts and that it is reali•; DCr Lincnt to nnrhar_c C Co-:mission could take action on that item at the time it is addressed. l-Q--MiSSioncr hcmpel stated that two w..Cks ago, th,2 Commission has reecin^er.t for sidewalks and the-- it was ci:an-ed bac'r, ^__ain to sidewalks on one side of the street. ... . Reu;eat replied that since Hell-an is a FeconCar'_: strC2t and not a major :hcro,:;^hfare, the requirement :or s,.dc-alks o:: beta sides would be ,:app-oor�at2. C.:-_.._.:.,ionor .. ...eel stated that hL felt ,_net there shcu'_d be a rc quire.^..ent for .>_ ictcais aloe^ Hellman. CJ-.mis%iicncr Tolstov stated that i:e felt t.,nt side:.alls in the nd;atrial area should be a require-tent for people s;h •.:ill be taking an bus to work and those in mini-car pools who --o�11d i.ralk from, the car pool to their ')..1cc o: work. Mr. Lc:-: stated that perhaps the Planni^ Commission could give staff direction on now comprehensive a plan thev would like in the industries', area. Cor.:-:'_ssioccr Re:-pet stated that it .as known that Hellman will be heavily travellod _ t the water is controlled on it. Further, that any street of that nature sh-Duld have sidewalks on one side. Commissioner Sceranka stated that it would be appropriate to look at ,edestrian ro:.tes from future transit stops. He indicated that there is no ::ay that people can get from Arroc, e:ccept a1on this street and thrt is not on e::ample of good planning. no r,:rtlier stnt•ed that he would like to look at individual streets in coniunctio❑ with transit and that tnCy shuul.d ;;cc if transit stops will occur at those noir.ts. '.?:. La:n if a sidcw;i1l: polio': i1e.: 1d i,,• impltmented of Navin^ sidewalks ono ;do of _tr •ets do::n to th:• . ,:cnnr.::r•: ::vt:] Fla::hind Coc:miss;on Mir.utos -F,- Jnnu.lry 1R, 19SI f Cc-^issio❑er Toi:;tcy seated ti:a[ _ arc -- should also have ...id_ aa� ,- o. .. - u er._• si: _ . o :eccr he ccrtaini_: e in fa b vcr no. of that scccnda: on one side. - ...._.._.. ^. i:l opener the public he._ri . 'r c' Cori n stated that he wo::ld li;:e sere clari_`icztion from the Cot fission ..nd staff at this tiro a-' d asked if here e:ould be an: :i_`::_rc•nt consideration from the P'_annin^ Cur-:issisn and the Cit•: since in [heir r..aster plan the', were renuired to put in sidewalks oa both s_di•s of the stract and ti:e discussion now centers on puttin:, in siduwal'.:s on only one side.. Ci:airmnn Dahl replied that the cocas-nt was t'�;t ti be at leas[ en one side e. i tic street. C c:rissior.er Sceran'ka mated that his feelin^ is t?,.c*_ en seconcar-: and :^ajnr :trcets thev should be required because he does net wan[ to see p�c7,lc ja.r.alking the street in crdcr to _et to a si.d -ll:. :hc smaller •eot; S:1_ prC babl_: not care as t•uch tr:lffic So ._3 t0 pr�eC lace pCC?iC slre._;: tO t0 ._ _ sldora:i!.. =::c•re• bein>, no further comments, the public portion was closed . C=mission then went or. to item with L'ar iio^an, City Planner the staff report. Cr..mi:,si.e❑_ r Sct�ranka asked i ;: condlition No. 5 is only - request to ci:��•;e the landse-apin, by ti:c nag;?iCL;1C or it is .,i part of the sta- co::di[ion. ' replied that it is not a condition of the a;: iicant but a staff su;,;;csted Ccnrition. Commissiuner Sceranka asked what the material is an the north side of the property that will buffer it frog tha adjacent prc ,,crt.: Hogan replied that no fcncin is proposed . Commissioner Sceranka stated that north of tinis is Carisma Spas, with a treat amount of unscreened story e. Ho . a r R fvrthc�r sty-ec. f.a[ no canr.a- conceive that anv other user would appreciat, locatin-; below wi[::oc:t some protected vier;. 110 .,t:itLd that he wel+ld like to set: e:o:-e d•,nsc Or sr•reenin^ along tl:eso t.Co nrC+pert B:.. io,;. ;; replied t;i t ;r scr, ❑_ o❑ o: istl. :'ro;:,_rt : sirou;ri care ct :,•: � .- Ccun: -. !u•;:• ••;,1r, i f den :,�r landsca,,in•, Ic5s c:•_::red b:: a;,;; i ic::::t, iC c:;n i'•c rivn•,. Planning ro-Fission ":im:tcs -7- January 28, 1951 i C_ ::is: Or a J1J_..- ._a l: ..as needed o^i' La_. Sor-"n-;.I _ _C=_ a nd t:-. le ® Caa L. ...:1 Dal l7i CL Ct:: iic !:__.. _ Mr. �_.. ._ _ ,.,.__r, i_�=^^ L....,. _ Av nue, ?.:. ..-.c•.... ._�crossec Co=iss on ...,.. .,.-,_._. L...__ L' haC. ,.ct re CC_c."'c t sta: = _ _ t z..,. ^.00 .....J'.. StII=_ _ 'CO...-en.-..._`_O❑ ..as. ... . $utlur ..__.. a COr'. OL tha report. tale C071-4 _1on: ; CCTI[�_..•2Q On DLrCv ...C!D rey..__ _. .• Lion Street at ti:7_ o_ ^.on.: OL Co' ?arCCl and LMerlenc': accesS from -. ..ai One to Da_cei two Oar o:n:i 2, 17.an.. ihcrC be. Curtner co-.::=ts, :Ji_c _ _ L_Cn ..as C10 S2C. e 1,�-715ti1.^.n.Cr .o!s:ov stated that t�:_ Cam'....:Sb .. :'ust De stropl u'] Lrcnt an.: ..^.Jt pLSS Jt around He turf:,er stazea- i1Cn. Street ..co needed 2 : _ dedicated at this tim, t[,n t the co=isr^-;On should state K4-.7 stated tha_ ._ had orOC:l r.$ D:i_.. t..e narCei split ..... ]Cu ... _.. CC...-ission__ Tolstoy on t c C._=1' C. dc.._._ntioa. :+t. ther, nC _n.. _.ated t:1]L Si`e..alks "ou-4 b' toCu` .... _x1.l-an. C:C..._;9:0 SCcran lnd=C-_'tcd tC---, __ is ..'_ __Cult for peo'_a wno live a` _ r_or in the area to s_et arcun-4 espec:aiiy in the rain an'• cS:+CC i"liv out Of `,.e drive-ways on [iCiiC.:_... ':e stated than he diG Lice idQl o a parce_ 1-apL s:._...itt: to c'. _c ._.ent a nrob1o7, ::at S L_ii _. LS. ns a City O_ ,__C_..- '-C• _.. .Lc .n.0 t ri0 S07:eC2;n __C Cn.s::rC that -he problem is c_li:`::.'I:CC. iiC SC,'`+ _.__t.1er tG,'!L Caere. ..... Oo SCco-za7v access in .,,,s proiect and d not r_n0.. w..n_ t-at be ut :could not ap?rove it without it. Yr.^3o _ _au replied that the secondary access i_ be acr�oved cv the Fi_ nova. _7ient to -involve pron_r'v co-pa, ted ma.-rial 'or .ne'drivewa: and su._ace and blend ir. wita the vacant land. Cz=i ssioncr Sceran a stated that _here is a barrier at :ae sou'. hart o: _ion Street that would have to be re-o-:ed ar.d that he has no objection to the eaerrencv access as !on- as can bQ used e:Lolo•:ees. He _'urLier stated that he di not _eel it ropriate for the parcel ma-.) so tnrcuzii unless _ ere is access. Xr. st: that ..cCess o[_ Or _.o:: SL_.,et arov,ded by _.;� C. _`- - _Cn. `li. .....-, �..:._ _.i .Cl•_ r.`..... _...- .�.. CC:...,.. . ..� .... L..c SLi�UIC.IJ.^. cn ;".av:e. , C.. ..is.i.- Can ..:Llt it CancO-.e rack ?1.2:1n1 _ COC:-4--'sion .f:n _tQ,; -S' J::.^.liar•_. :S� iC.41 -ao - r • •lirC was futtn=r CiscUs Sio^. re1�L1 . _ LO ' that Lion Str:� .3,:v J::u•i). _- C: C_,- .. ^4 _:.-- C❑ .?1C-^?:GC 1J...-7ya:...t .IOU1t be 7.0,,Siblo to aS:: _Cr nn Cc-_. ZO Cam := S;ion.er lO1StUt• stated ?.�- LhC C` � i � it Can. ,.`2-:1OU-C bi: put in t.._ SC 70sitiOT: .•_ . -._... C:ip1G_:;ed th'� C'le'r�2II a- C^ CCCSs CcSc'lent- further d-Sol— for it wasd - ca_ _ co e b•. Tolsto} , secondec ied l:na -_']oiasly. to .7ennr Sceran.k�a, ..^d ^. CSC_:1 •.� Lu aece?t L^e Jarcel ` _1• o of dedicatica or Lion Street _,. Lel_-ar.; a coa,.ition fcr s; the resolutiUn of e_er _ - cenC- 3CGc55; ^.e CC12tiCn OL- CO di t'OZ :.='- ..iL'n the addition of cond= t�,,_. No. o. • y - �zn�: Cp.nr,S5I0`��5: Tolstop, Sc__..n'•'a. Dahl NOZS• CC:^:ISS10::EBS: Sore A5S-.,_ - CO:'MISSIONE-S: `:one -c.:_. _ed- Ci:--_r._sa Da-:1 c e ed s -sari r er, r `o. 'o_ - - _... :.._re bcir. ro co-n•=^-ts ainst ;e r.ublic hearin taas cic_0-. - Cn-:missicn.-_ :.__ _ stated t ha t he d ' n di. _ wi_.. e e e, icns :Ot till-... _t si.,,,:ld ?Ir- .. ^an e:c?ice_ ed the elevatio%s to the CO=cession. :;in^ replied that it a-1^ ._red ..nat there -• so-:_.. -iscre?ar.cias ac go ber the elevations. Eolloc;i^.r, brief discussion, was :Deed by Rc^?e1, s=corded be olstov, carr,,ed, LO adopt Resol_ut'_en ,':o. 51-1�, and twat t^� entire roJect be reviec,•ed b_�- t.:C Des i,Tl Rovic-4 po'L^.•1.Ltee ar.'� be Sub CCt to -theirs aD?rOVal -,i:wh.00t Co^: b:ck, be Pore the Coev,.ission. ` ^ Tire concerns e:.pre.-.sel ay [he Com7.iss4on to be S d b D_SizaCoc_ittec, zere traF.-• rece?tacl , .dr_; aa} s, aar.:iL ice. oct 1 an'- aisi.e K —a e — RESOL'JTIv^''l i D. A RESGLUT":I 0= THE RANI HO CUCA DiN.'GA PL.;l!NING CC."^ISSIO APPROVIl iG THE TIME EX T E'r!STCUN FOR PARCEL :!AP 5535 :,HERtAS, a request has been filed for a -e _xt ^.Sl `Or t^� above-described project, pursuant to Section i.5D1.32 bj of Drdinance 2 3, the Subdivision Ordinance; and :vHEREAS, the Planning Cc mission conditionally a�prCved t abo're-described Lentative parcel map. SECTIOP' 1 Tn'a Ranc ho Cucamonga Piannin. c,-_ ission as made the follo.ving ,-ineings: A. That prevailing economic conditions have caused distressed market climate for residential projects; D. That current ecor.om:c, mar<etinc, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable build at this time; C. That 'strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent of the Development Code; D. That there has been no si;nficant charges to the character of the area in which the project iS locat_d that could cause the project to become n.onconfor^;ing or inconsistent .xith current standards. SECTION, 2: The Rancno Cucamonga Planning Co:rmi<_sion hereby grants a time extension for: Tract ArpIicant Expiration 5535 Butler July 28, 1934 APPROVED M?ND A.ODPTED THIS 3TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1934. i " ING n �_nN:�.�w C.,^rMISSIO�J 0= THE CITY OF ?Af1CH0 CJC:;'•�D'�GA ay. Dennis L. Stout, Chairman All Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary -a a- i, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commmissior. of t^e City of Rancho CUCa-nonga, do hereby ccrLifY `..hat tha fcrnnnirn RAcplii-_inn 1.. regularly ;introduce,,', passed, and adopted by _he ?iannino Commission of the- City o' Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular Meeting of the Plannin❑ Conimission held on the oth day of Februa g3Y, b the following atom- - rY, Y ; got - wi 'Y'S: CO i'4ISSIO�i_RS: k' ."4.1TSS.ONERS: ' :SENT: C 0:1'4 I S S I0 N L P,S: a J Y' — CITY OF RANCHO CUCO +� ONTGA Ct ✓ 77:1 = '• T= DA T C. February 8, 1984 TO: Planning Commission I FRom: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer i BY: Barbara Krall , Engineering Technician i i SUSJECT: TIME EXTENSION - PARCEL MAP 7051-4 - KAISER DEVELOPMENT - Located at the southeast corner of bth Street ano Piiili Avenue j Kaiser Uevelopment Company (formerly Kacor) has submitted a request to it extend tentative approval time for Parcel Map 7051-4 du_ to recent unfavorable economic circumstances. i 1 Parce, flap 7051-4 received tentative approval for the bivision of 28.7 acre into 24 lots within the Industrial Park District (Subarea 12) or, February 10, 1982. The staff report and minutes from the February 10, 1942 meeting are attached for your review. This project is located in the Industrial .Area and conforms tV;tn the Industrial Specific Plan, Subarea 12. RE700"' ^.ESDATIOL- It is recommended that a 12-,month extension be granted for this project. The new expiration date will be February 10, 1985. Respectfully submitted, iLBMi•3�:jaa j Attach-gents i i oc ITEM C --- !ate C 0R rune 30, 1983 ..;.,.,.:.,or:ga Cc7L unity Development Department Engineering Division 9320 Baseline Road, Ste. C ?ost Office Box 807 Ra^chc Cucamonga, CA 91730 ;.ttention: Barbara Krall Engineering Technician Re : Request for Extension Parcel Mar NO. 7001-4 Cear Ms. Krall : It is our understanding that the above-referenced Parcel Map is scheduled to expire on February 80, 1984. As a result of recently unfavorable economic circumstances, development of this property has not proceeded as quickly as anticipated. Therefore, KACOR Development Company requests that this parcel Rap be extended for a period of one ( 1 ) year, or until February 10, 1985. Please contact me, if there are any questions. Very truly yours, Clinton L. Davis Manager of Engineering CLO.;dv cc : Can Reid ,.ark Singer:ran ... .. •.... is ..il r — CITY OF R \CHO CUC-IMONGA sea r TA RE FORT 17 Febrla_r.> 10, 1981 - y- `ice,: p-,S.in- Ccm-ussicn i -.Rai: idoyd B. Huw_bs, City Eng-inear 1 BY: Barbara Krall, E':yinaering `:o'^clmician S�J'w�C:: E1ZrIF(T_,: r�SS=---L�l 0u1-4 - :?= A di-,"Sion of 28.7 acres into 24 lets within t_^e :-2 I zone located on the scut''Pr;est corer, of 6th Stroet and Alilliken Avenue - FLDV 210-082-8,9,i0 I `.; nr" '• C T_ e acolic.'-^_t 1s recruc-st_'1C a further subdivision Of the T:Jllr_h p:L'se oL C-1 lc? 7061. approved. b', Pla_--min^y CC^fission On Septc-Ler 9, 1981_ All phases are shcum on the attached tInt?tive map. ,ch lot c«11 be sub-ect to furth.c- review before development but all giblic i.,.nrcvcnents necessary for orderly deti%elor.s t will be recui e,,jezts of the Parcel Map. A ccncepttual g-adi.-ic plan, a recuJrerient of Parcel i4ap 7061, has been approved_ The lot sizes and circulation systc.i of this subdivisicr_ are in accordance with j the Industrial Specific Pia^_, S.:barea ;12. All Furr—c l:^.ding proper,' 1s with n the ^-2 zone and is vacant at this tL e. Approved Parcel Map 6085 6Roll-Lyon) lies to the east. A ccncep-_,:al site plan shOLu'ing possible deve10pr„ent of the lots 1s attached 1 for your review. 1 =VI-�9..Z E :I T A=YSIS: Also attached for vour review and consideration is I Part i of the Initial St•,:,^y as cc^sleted by the apa11__t. Staff has c iete3 JiJ I Part II of the Initial Study the e_mrirc:-L e.^_tal cheCSCllst, a^.d has convicted a I Z1e:.d in'v estlgatl:Jn_ Upon Ct_'+:Ip1e`.=0n a^.3 reviC".vl Of the I711tial Study and field i investigation , -Staff found no siCTlficart adverse L-, aacts On the errvir0_^S^eIt. as a resat of the proposed subdi >isicn_ R.CCi,= =•?'ICN: it is recc- ended that tr.a tcnta`wived, sib;e�tve :yap be appro t0 thy_' Cat' :Yg_noe- ''s ?-oport, and th�4-_ a "_•:iC'.ative Declaration he issued. A re.`iOlutlCn 15 at',.aCh.('d t0 for up^. Val S:L:'11d t^.`a CGT^15510^ Q'`nC113r. 1 RespectfLully S b ttee, i I / L3"sz:�T(:iaa Attac.}rents RESOLUi _C:i NO. f2-L1 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CGi!MISSIOii OF THE CIT"' OF P.A11CHO CUCA'101iCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MIAP NUMBER 7061-4 (TE"iTATIVE PARCEL elAP NO. 7C61-4) LOCATED ON THE SOMPIIEST CORNER OF 6TH STREET AND MILLIKEN AVENUE 1�"EREAS, Tentative Parcel "tap Number 7061-4, submitted by Kacor Development Company and or,sistir.g of 2 c located Y c 4 parcel _ , ocat_d On the SOGthF:eSt corner p{ F+h '+.-eC} Ord °",illjnen Avenue, being a division Of Lut 17 and the North 1/2 of Lot 24 ;•lap of Cucamonga Lands, M.B. 4 Face 9; end id'HEREAS, on December 24, 1981 , a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above-described tentative map; and 1•1HE2,E,,.S, on February 10, 1982, the Planning COMmission held a dui; advertised public hearing for the above-described map. NO`% THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUC AiiO".GA PLA`iNiNG COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLL061S: SECTIO"! 1: That the fo'.l1.v4ng findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 2. That the improve-ent 01' the Pr-nosed subdivision is consistent 'with the preeosed General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed Subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse environmental irnacts and a 1;egative Declaration is issued on February 10, 1932. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel '13p "lo. 71,61-4 is approved Subject t0 t_e Conditions of the City Engineer' s Report pertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED T +i3 lO1 DAY OF FERUARY, 19"�1 . PLANNING C017^ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCi'.0 COCA' ^'O:iGr, Resolution ;Io. 82-2I Page 2 ' r 4"z JeT- _ ,bvY r,9 a, nairf s � N Secretary of the Planning Co-=ission i , JACK LAtd, Secretary of the Planning Co-mission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga , do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly anal recularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Co^-issicn o-. the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meetino of the Planninc Co:rr,ission held on the 10th day of February, 1982, by the vote-to-wit: AYES: COT:VIISSTON.ERS: Sceranka, Tolstoy, Re^:;el , 1,inq 1,27s: CUMMISSIONERS: Bone ABSEidT: Coi-IMISSIONERS: Dahl i CITY OF R '.CfiO CCC,.:'O� GP+ CI1 J E:1G1 :rFn ' s 7rpnr F 1 LED D , =,acor Derelo=ent Co. 1 E7J7 T I':E ''.a. ' :;0. 7061 LC�r l i'' is Scutu.wnst co`•ncr of 6t.^_ Street cand. : 1111:^P DATr Fii F:J : 12/24/31 tIli"5ER OF LOTS : 24 LE_ ! CESC^IPTION: Lot 17 nn3 the -North i 2 cf Lot 24 ^^r'-' PT DER. Cu�a:-IY�nag tan^Cs. xT34r Uc.C(-' 9 FEE ZMF_: -T11^ nt1.,E PR- -t. . D Cy: Dorbisit, Guerra & sso,_. GR^SS ACPE„GE: 26.7 st roe Suite 1 :' ^, S 2 Fii:li _ LOT - : Cntario. Cr. 91764 ('I::It1U ' LOT FRC'ri TAGE- 'R REC RD 0'a?IER S ADCRESS P NE Co. _P_0_r5c. ?C5r ,=^coal :, CA 92390 676-5641 REPORT OF THE CITY ENGINEER De�_icazions y 1 . Dedication by final map of all interior street rights-of-::ay and all necessary easerients as sho:•rn on the tentative map. 2. Dedication by final map of the fcllo:•rinc missing rights-of-way or, the following streets: ?0 additional feet on 6th Street 30 additional feet on Kil_z.:en _ venue additional feet on -- Corner P/L radius required c,i _ _ Other J. Rights Of ':ehiC:l lar dC'�:;Ss Srall f:e I�:•1'Y.itii .�t}$t:u�.+i�.'1�::F.ii GC'C'1CatC'Cl aloIA CO_nticTuc 's t0 milliRn-n tom:,-o ue c1n3 6t1i Stroet e}:CCDt ty,0 50-foot o,.)e_nlnGs on _ 4. *4v g 1 3,�,�g}T Y1� Plii1 i}:cz and utree 50-foot eaeZircs on 6Lh Street. 5. Plaster Plan of Streets revision recuired tor: 6. The follo,iing perimeter intersections require realignment as follows: _aq _ RCE 20 i - TENTATIVE "AP "0. 7061-4 Page 2 Icr.rovements (bonding is requiredprior to:L Recording {W ) 7. Construct full street improvements (including curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, one drive approach per lot, parkway trees and street lights) on all interior streets. 3. Construct the following missing improvements on the fol ?orrina streets : *including ?andscaoing and irritation on meter CURS b A.C. SIDE-! DRIVE STREET I �T zr-f 1 t.IEDiAi; I I �- =T F I O ITTFD i Ol!"dT i,in`v ! P. f -r.Ecc I I rrvj-c x I X x i i X I I ! 9_ Construct all storm dram and drainage Structures as shotm on, the tentative map, or as required by the City Engineer. ?D. Provide all utility services to each lot including sanitary see-jers, water, electric power, aas, telephone and cable television .con�uit. All utilities are to be underground_ ®r __ 11 . Ceveloper shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as neces—ry. 12. Ir.s:all appropriate street name signs and traffic control signs with Icca- ticrs and types approved by the City Engineer. 13. Pcveloper is to provide all construction plans for drainage and street provements . Such plans shall meet approval of the City Engineer. 14. Sanitary se4:er and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County !rater District standards. A 1 �tter of acceptance is required. i5. Street light locations, as required , are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of rancho Cucamonga shall be decorative poles with underground service. lo. The following existing streets being torn up by new services ;:ill require an A.C. overlay: 17. The hs) a:ren tapprov dimensions, cul-de-sac radius, street section widthsl zre not approved : 10'. The following eYistlno streets Thev will require: P,Dorcvals and Fees 19. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of appro:al from CALTRANS/ San Bernardino County Flood Control District. x 20. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agen- cies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. a C— RCE 20 TEiTATI VE i'AP ;i7. 7Q,5 -4 Page 9 H zl . fcr^.its f> c o"ler a er.cies 1i71 5 e required as fallo:a: A. Caltrans, for: _ C. Count' sr. Abatement District: D. D. I.S. Trenching Permit if any trenches are over 5 ' deep: E. Cucamonga County Water District: sewer and water F. Other: �n �� ro1 22. if only a portion of this flap is recorded. adjustmcozs shall he trade to pro- vide for t'ex-L1ay traffic and parkins on all aIferced streets. _ 23. The follo'.:in_; lots apcear to be substandard in either frontage, dept.' or area and should be corrected on the final map: _ .. All corner lots shall have a corner radius at the rignt-oT-Play line lr accord- a.ncgp with tnc r:4i . _) 0 7 v wi.c.I:J:ra standard's. 2 _ A Parcel '*-!do Shall be reccrded prior-to the first phase subdivision to prevent the creation of an unrecognized parcel located 20. Tire bGundary m the Tentative t!ap needs clarificatir:l as folic:ls: 27_ the border Shall be Sho::n t0 Centerline Of existing perimeter Streets , Or tide explanation required. P�rcel "n ) '.'.aiver 2B. information submitted at the time of application is (_ is no •.z` sufficint to support the issuance of a waiver of Parcel Yap Certificate , according to requirements of the State t•lap Act and local ordinances. Flood Control (Eor.dinn is required prior to ❑ Recording for ) II Building permit for ) 29. Proposed Slibdivsion fails l:itiiin those areas indicated as subject to fiOod- ing under the f:ationai Flood Insurance Program. This subdivision P1ill be Susiect to the provisions Of that Program and Ordinance %o. 24. Zone A-0 _ 'O_ A draina^.e cl.annei and/or flood protection r:rll along the ent.ir'e north ro- ot` 1 i ne ;-a b, p party / � requi -eS to divert sheet runoff to streets. Such fi0:1rlay be required to ❑o un>'er side:talks tor^,Tgf culverts . tor -;dace i� z;Lo,. ' to;" Of curb, JO" P:411s sha 1 , b e r^_quireq at the back Of the side::ai '•: at all d mstrc-.v: car` returns . CulvertsregUlred to :Jc constructed across Streets at fol IU':lirlg locations : ?�. Brood scat8 h,ydr01U91c SLUGi Q,S I I FTbe I'e� Ulreq t0 assess ii::pa Ct Oi increased run,off. X 34. L^.stallatian of a portion of the ML•stcr P1a.-mod Storm Drain No. 7E may be rewired at the discretion or the City E yineer. Tne extent of the, improvanent shall be as determined by the City T_�nairieer and to be coordinated with Assess ent District 79-1 project. RCc 20 -�1 - ' iL�II,I I'.1G iAP 'uD, 706_I-4 Page 4 r. :1isceliar.ec :s 36- 'us t abatameri! will be '?lade a conditi-r. of issuance cf the grading permit for this project. _ .)G. Noise impact on this project will be mitigated in accordance with the Planning Division report on subject property. 37 . This property is not within the present City boundary and `:;ill require annexation. 3�• All information required to be sho•in On the ILntati•:e cap is riot shm,,,n as re- t. TJi r=ui °Q. Prrncer grading and erosion cont, O i , including the pYeV^cn LatiOn Of S2d iT:er,ta_ tion cr damage to offsite nrcperty shall be provided for as required. 40. P. preliminary soils report will r•Ct be required for this site for the folio`:r in^y reasons: A copy of the soils report furnished to the Building Division prior to grading will be furnished tC the [nn,in2ering Division. 41 • The f?ling of the tentative map or apprcvai of same does not nuarantee that se::er treatment capacity will be available at the time building_ oermits are requested. hher. building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County '.later District will ba asked to certify the avaiiabiiity of capacity• Permits will net be issued unless sa"d c :rtification is received in ::ritinc. 42. The City Engineer shall mane the determination, in accordance with Section 66436(C) (1 ) 0f the Subdivision Map Act, that division and development of the pre; erty will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise ® of any public entity or public utility right-Gf-Clay or easement and the sicna- ture of any .sucii public entity or pUbliC Utility mdy be oMitted frOGi the final map unless the City is notified in Y:ritinr, of ;mr objection to said determina- tion within the specified time lir..its of said Section_ At the time of Final ;--Pp submittal , the fo11c�•:ing shall be submitted: Traverse calculations (sheets) , copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and/ or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. 44. Development shall be limited to one drive apprcac;� per street. ;'ultiole lots fronting on a single street shall use common drive approaches at lot lines. x 45. Applicable per-icns of the co^onions fo- P.-ce'_ :lap 7061 shall also apply to this project_ C:TI nc : Cu ,::�.O::GH LLOYD B. HUESS • � CITY E;lGItdEER - .yam P,CE 20 � r INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT 1INFORrlATION SiiEFT - To be co,;.plated by applicant En-7ircnmental 7?ssessmey.t Review Fee: $' 0 . 00 For all TD=Jects requiring environmental revie,: , this form must be completed and submitted to the Devc'opment Re i e:a Cc-V ii ttee through -he d, partment o:hcrc the project application is made_ Upon receipt of this application, the Erviron^ental Analysis staff will prepare Fart II of the Initial Study_ The Dear, --gent Review Co-_mittee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time time prof is to be heard_ The COMMittee will -take one of three determinations : 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental L-nnaet and an En-.ircnmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should he supplied by th^- atplicant giving further information concerning ti:e proposed project . PROJECT TITLE: "orthview Business Park APPLICANT ' S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPI-ONE : KACC2 Development Comnanv P.C. Bo:: 755 Temecula, California 92390 (714) 575-3541 NP,ME, ADDRESS, TELEPi-ONE OF PERSON TO BE CO=ACTED CGNCERNING THIS PROJECT: :'.ark Rowson C/o KACOR Devc-lonment Co. P.C. 'Box 755 fer..ecula, ^alifornia 92390 (714) 676-5641 LOCITION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AL'D ASSESSOR PAPC£L NO- ) SOutrhwest corner of 6`h Strtet -d Xilliken Avenue. 09 10 LIST CT--ER PERMITS .NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE ANL I'EDL-RAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: -33 - Z-1 t PROJECT i F.SC2I?'TIO:: DESCRIP":ION OF PEOj—_- C 24 Lot — 23.7 Ac-e .^ ust. .al of ucuivi ion ACRT:AGE OF PROJECT AREA AP:D S i'RRE SOT.AGE OF EXIGTITIG AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS , IF :,NY: Crc:vs Acres DESCRIBE TIi., F%c'T i:,T c. OF ^ T.:E PROJECT SITE INCLUDING I::rV R'L',TIO:I`Oi3 TOT_ G: '. PII _'.TS (TREES ) , ANIt'1LS, All CL'LTi'R?+L, ..ISTOiZ_C:,L CR SC-.',ITC ASPECTS , USE. OF SU �OLD:DIi:^ PPO=L_='Ii S , A::D ,:'.r !;.".SC:�IP ION OF A`7= 1ST__.G _STRi;,. U. —S i•..._ a.,ZR LSE A .n...i . ._ SSAF.Y SiiEETS _-:_stinsz protect yito is gz=a vinevares opo m-aany falls at 2 to i-e south o existin-_ structures on si` - Is the ^ro-;Cct, na_t of a 1.-..�^er DTJ�'_Ct, one 'JF a series ? Of actions, which although individually small, a may as a whole have :-i-nificant envi.ron=ental :rrnact? e; No I- �L Y Y__ =� .< 1 . Crcat� u::s=tantlal change in ground contours? 2 . Create a change in existing noise or vi-rr-n.ticn? 3 . Create a su st=ntia1 -In:n :? in do-mand ror n,.inici a1 �er,.ic -o' 11re, water, - sewage, etc_ ) '. 4. Create C❑a-=" ?s 4 n a.}•n ^viStln� ZOnln^y or general plan cesi7 . _ _ _ons : S - Remove any -''>:1S`_17;C tr^es? liow Islam,-? Cre3t^_ t:?e Or disnosal Of potcnti-11 t:a ar : a atcria, _ such as tOx-; c sibsta.lces, fla gables nr exniosi es? Explanation of an _ answers I1'-M -f • if the vrcj�-ct i_nvol%-cs the ccnst_ ,Ictlon Of residential un-its , complete t;le for^ On the next page- CERT_I'_TC7T-110:._ T ..crc�_. `crtif that t e s'.ateMents furnishe above and in the attached exhibitr present the 3ata and information rcat:ired for this in e •aluation to the best Of .'.+.: a:.`lllt_' , an^ U:fit t11e _acts, and infor=a,tion ^rescrto;�_ ark: tr,J^ and corr•_ct to {'};!+ best OS I iLrt.^.e tier .�..P.stC.. `'•I ^.Q L' t additicn? 1 infoi- atioP. ^al,• 11e reQl:; re-' to he SII_ itted before an aCCOL`ate e•.aL'lation can be made by the Dtvo icDm�Rf Review Co!-LL,Iittee, Date i i=f Signature Title T-3 LLI cm r i yo i. r f , a i =iYES: CO` dISSIO`:ERS: 1, ., c ESL, TC STOP TN'^ asSE;:T: Co_•MISSIO::ERS: ..-,lion: Moved Sccran'ka, seconded by Rcmpel, carried, to adopt the esolution approving ?lanned Development 52-02. AYES= CO`^'ISSIO:dERS: S RE'TEL, TOLSTCY `.OES: CO`^tISSIOtc',S: NONE _'s�::I : COM^IISSIONERS: DAIii. et 'TAL ASSESS"E%T ANT) PARCEL ".to 0 ' _ _ of 25_ ; ccras into 24 lots c._thin the M-2 :one located on the scut hwest corr.cr of 6th '�traet and Milliken Avenue - Ap": 2'0- GS2-3, 9, 10. Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer, reviewed the Staff report. Commissioner Tolstoy asked `.r. Roureau :here this industrial tract would Et into the storm drain system. `r. Rouge-au replied that there would be a storn drain, provided be the Assessment District in Cleveland Avenue. Chaf-=on ring opened the pudic hearing. Dan Reed, Sea Diego, representing the applicant, addressed the Cn:T.ission and stated that his engineers were present to a:saver any technical questions the Co=nissicn -sight have. There were no further questions or co .•cents from the public, therefore the public hearing ::as closed_ ='lotion: ;loved by Sceranka, seconded by Tolstoy, carried, to adopt the Resolution approvirg Parcel Map "061-5_ AYES: CO:r'ISSIOXEP.S: SCER :.a.1, TGI.STOY, M!MISSIG"1:7s: N0: ABS ?: COXMISSIO::ERS: DA71L Planning CoTission `brutes -6- February 10, 1952 ® RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING THE TIME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 7061-4 WHEREAS, a request has been tiled for a time extension for the above-described project, pursuant to Section 1.501.82(b) of Ordinance 28-B, the Subdivision Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above 9escribed tentative parcel map. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: A. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a distressed market climate for residential projects; B. That current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable build at this time; C. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent of the Development Code; D. That there has been no signficant changes to the character of the area in which the project is located that would cause the project to become nonconforming or inconsistent with current standards. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a tir„e extension for: Tract Applicant Expiration 7061-4 Kaiser Development Co. February 10, 1985 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF FEBRUA.RY, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAmONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regulariy introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City or Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of February, 1984, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA G�ycw,t�pM �- STAFF REPORT - z i DATE: February 8, 1984 19„ TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Colemnan, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 83-43 MESSENGER The development of a , OOsq. ft. war— eeouse/distribution building on 9.9 acres of land in the General Industriai category (Subarea 8) located north of Arrow and east of Elm Avenue - Parcels 2 & 3 of Parcel Map 7244. 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Issuance of a Negative Declaration B. Purpose: Construction of a 101,000 sq. ft industrial building C. Location: Easterly terminus of White Birch Drive D. Parcel Size: 9.9 acres E. Existinq Zoning: General Industrial (Subarea 8) F. Existing Land Use: Vacant jG. Surrounding Lard Use and Zonin : North - In ustria ; Industrial fsrk (Subarea 7) South - Industrial ; General Industrial (Subarea 8) East - Vacant; General Industrial (Subarea 8) West - Vacant; General Industrial (Subarea 8) H. General PlanDessiign�atio" Project Site - General Industrial North Industrial Park South - General Industrial East - General Industrial West - General Industrial i. Site Characteristics: The site slopes gradually to the south at approximately a one percent grade. The project site is vacant with no structures or significant vegetation. White Birch Drive street improvements have been completed with the exception of drive approaches. —t4 C)— ITEM D !-LMltlIY11\O 1.VuLLA.11V11 �IYIrI r`4V � Environmental Assessment For DR 83-43;i4essenger February 8, 1984 Page 2 J. Applicable Regulations: The Industrial Area Specific Plan permits warehouse/distribution buildings on minimum half-acre lots in the General Industrial category (Subarea 8) . 1I. ANALYSIS: A. General : Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant and is attached for your review and consideration. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Assessment and found no significant impacts on the environment as a result of this project. Upon approval of a Negative Declaration, staff will grant final approval of the project based upon conditions recommended by the Design and Development Review Committees. 1II. RECOMMENDATION: Based on site analysis and the initial Study, this project will not cause significant adverse impacts on the environment. If the Commission concurs, issuance of a Negative Declaration for this project would be in order. Respectfujly submitted, Rick Gomez'- City Planner RG•DC:jr Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "8" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Conceitual Landscape Plan D Exhibit " " - Grading Plan Exhibit "E" - Elevations Exhibit "F" - Master Plan Exhibit "G" - Site Photographs Initial Study, Part I 1 441 I . t rJOiM'��' b;VD _.FfbTH11.L�. roo:Hilt ' r- ISM i Z I n1tnpw fF,4U:[ I IIUI I I V NORTH CITY OF ITEM- - '`�� • �"�► RANLCHO C,'CA.'I0.NL (sA TITLE: L w,-P no tA ��-P-P PLAN\iiNG DIVISION E.XHIBiT-_SCALE- �� 6 it -MIX I ; PROJECT SWWAARY t01 1 _ I uwuww nr; CODE SUMMARY NORTH I I I r L I i CITY Oi flTG�fl _� " 4%tp RANCHO CUCANNIONGA TITLE: _ t5lTe F AhN PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT:_�_SCAM I I ' � rl r , r I ' ill � � I � t I � , lill ' i I I � I i I I I I I , I � I I I I � I I 1 . 1 i I I r a Y ' � I k � •.w�wwo;`air 1 I 1 I y srcr — I I I I NORTH CITE' OF ITEM: �`� �� � wor RANCHO A. C<1.L%I0\'GA TITLE: pL�NNING DrIVISION E\HIPAT: _SCALE: •••••� 1 -1 9 I � L J- I f 1 I"I � Cua'e4 C'Jr.•Sw C :l C' RT 'Tun.K .1••C, �. 1 a.a�nw..m. uu�.•r. — w•. src 1 l � r, 11 1 � I NoxTl-I CITY � ,� �v: � > OF RANCHO CL"CALIIQ\GA 'nTLE PL AN NtNG DIX �Slo, T �o — E�CIiIB(T:- SCALE: •,"^°� rl J � WEST / HOR'H 2ND 9 b y WEST/ SOUTH END NORM SOUTH FAST/ NORTH END ti I 9 EAST / SOUTH END NORTH CITY OF ITEM: RANCHO CUCA1I0\GA TITLE- PLANNING DIVS,ON EXHIBIT: SCALE- 3:: i..�!"EiII�3}�S�—II'�l'•�l7t�fi'7'�'$.'u�l�3Y:1�'f��zrQ T1• 111 1 fiit_^,]p a W . . __1�.I..r `e j`�,•]y1 y't. tin 1 �� i'R'7-irri 1 �M•l�Vpi�_� �S�_�.1-�. P I 1•n�+c � � A 11 T• i 1 �4 1� r Meg n acm ° x �nl V NORTH CITY OF ITE.XI- RAlCHO CL C ,t101GA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT- SCALE: ••-.-".• L4 ? 4• • , t. 7. It ii u � n- 1^ t O• CITY OF, R , CUCkNIONGA �; �$, • i� t i t J ti_e /JJ�t CITY OF _ZANI CHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PRCJECT 7-NFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $E7. 00 For all projects Zequiring environmental review, tiiis foam mus t� be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application_ is made. Upon_ receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Co=ittee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determin: tions : 1) The nro-iect will have no signi- ficant environ__antal impact and a Negative Decl4ration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental i.roact and an Environmental Impact Report will be arepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informz- tion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: 2C i APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS , TELEPHONE: 1�1 1 fl, /1 d, „ NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE O� PEPSON TO 3E CGNTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT : T: C� C- r <"/' - :+ �:_ ti - •� T�'L•�: — -1L r. tom.<. . _ - LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSO.n PARCEL NO. ) LIST OTHER PERMITS tiECESSAF_ FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE A2ND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUC: PEMMITS : I-1 _yq _ PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: �+ �'C/ C[.c- �% �_ �:tT ••.Fr. < ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 61 Ci DESCRIBE rHE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING II:FORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) ANII.I.ALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS ., USE OF SURRO—LADING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF A1.'Y EXISTING STRUCTURES {{I,ND THEIR USE/ (ATTACH NECESSARY{ SHEETS)rc' CL- . ic.,.I nr .• S L: f- .r t^ ,�. I .1 jai cc. Sr • T"F ..4.'e�i 1r c`—• 0. �. Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions , which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? I-2 ' S� — C C WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO Create a substantial change in ground contOur5? 2. Create a substantial chance in existing noise or vibration? 3. Create a substantial charge in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. ) ? 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? -- 5. Create the need for use or dispos 1 of potentially hazardous materials =.ch as toxic substances , flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: IM?ORT NT : if tb a project involves the c:cnstructicn of resi-lential units, complete tie form cn the next page. CERTIPICA11ON: I hereby certify :hat the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the r data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements , and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowlec3e and belief. I further understand that addit=onal information may be required to be submitted ',sefore an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Re view Committee. . Date /G- i Signature 4 /& Title (�,; /, - rr*l tooVW 1-3 CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAMONGA STAFF DEPORT , DATE: February 8, 1984 -7D TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Cop-4ssion 197 FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner SUBJECT: o GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 84-01 A AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 8 -0 - OLYMPUS PACIFIC - A request to amend f is ^ : the General: Plan Lana Use Map fr...,, office t., Low MEA;u, Residential (4-8 du/ac) and a Development District amendment to chance the Development Districts Map from OP to LM, all on 4.36 acres located on the northeast corner of 19tn Street and Hermosa Avenue - APN 202-191-13. o GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 84-01 8 - LIY:0LN PRGPERTIES - A request to amend the GeneraF Pan Land Use Map from Office to Medium-High Residential (14-24 du/ac) on 3.67 acres located on the northwest corner of 19th Street and Archibald Avenue - APN 202-101-21. o GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 84-01 C - ACACIA - A reauest to ® amend the General Plan Land Use Map from Office to Medium-nigh Residential (14-24 du/ac) on 3.58 acres located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, approximately 500 feet north of Base Lire - APN 201-151-33. Following the January 25, 1964, Planning Commission meeting, staff contacted each of the aboi!e applicants to discuss their participation in the City-wide market assessment study for Office Professional uses. It is the consensus of these applicants to not participate in the funding of this analysis because: (1) no new information will be disclosed in order tht- i:alp the Commission make a decision; and (2) the extended time factor involved. It would be staff's reco:mnendation, based on the lack of consensus of the applicants to fund this stud_/, that staff be directed by the Comniss ion to prepare a site-specific analysis listing the current use and alternatives for the Commi -sion for each of these locations. Staff would also recommend that the Planning Commission continue the public hearing from tonight to March 14, 1984. Respectfully. submitted, Rick ;Gomez City Planner S ITEMS E. F, AND G // CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �iCAM;Q� STAFF REPORT c?j s \•. IZ 197 DATE: February 8, 1984 I! TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission I FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner i BY: Curt Johnston, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12601 - MORRIS & SEARLES - The development of 26 single family detached homes on 4.b acres of land in the Low Medium (LM) District, generally located on the nest side of Turner Avenue at Palo Alto Street - APN 1077-031-04. Related Project: Parcel Map 8298 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Issuance of a Negative Declaration, approval of a Tentative Tract Map, and building elevations. B. Purpose: Construction of 25 single family detached homes. C. Location: West side of Turner, between Base Line and Church D. Parcel Size: 4.5 acres of land E. Existing Zoning: "LM" (4-8 du/ac) F. Existing Land Use: Citrus grove G. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning_ : North - Citrus grove, single family homes, zoned "LM" South - Single family subdivision, zoned "L" (2-4 du/ac) East - Single family subdivision, zoned "L" West - Metal sheds previously used as chicken ranch, single family home, zoned "LM" H. General Plan DesiQnatiors: rojec' Site - Low Medium Residential North - Low Medium Residential South - Low Residential East - Low Residential West - i.ow Medium Residential _s ITEM H PLANNING STAFF REPORT Tentati�.e Tract 1260,/Morris & Searles February 8, 1984 Page 2 I. Site Characteristics: The project . site is irrently a citrus grove with no structures on site. The topograph.% of the site is a constant 2 percent grade sloping to the :,least. A row of Eucalyptus trees lies off-site along the west boundary of the project. II. ANALYSIS: A. General : This subdivision is the first project to be reviewed by the Planning Commission under the new "LM" District Basic Development Standards. The density of the project is 5.8 dwelling units per acre, with an average tot size of 6,001 square feet. A standard 36-foot wide street section with a 60-foot right-of-way is also proposed. In May 1981, Tentative Tract 11610 consisting of 28 townhomes as shown on Exhibit "G" was approved on the project site and is still valid. The project includes two, three, and four bedroom units ranging in size from 1,075 square feet to 1,472 square feet. A Cape Cod color scheme with wood siding on all elevations (no stucco) is p. posed. 3. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Co,.rnittee recommeded approval of the tract map and unit desion v.ith a number of corrections. In resp6nse to the Committee's concerns, the applicant provided a full porch on the smallest unit, and submitted a more detailed color scheme for the units. Colored drawings and a building materials sample board will be provided for your review at the meeting. C. Growth Mana ement Cotranittee: The Growth Management Committee recom en ed approval of the tract map with conditions as specified on the Resolution of approval and Standard Conditions form. With development of the project the applicant will be responsible for the reconstruction of Turner Avenue on both sides of the centerline. A condition of approval is provided to credit the reconstruction east of the centerline towards systems development fees or other reimbursement by the City. In addition, a 20-foot wide secondary/emergency access road must be provided from the end of the proposed cul-de-sac to Teak l:ay, approximately 400 feet to the north. The road will be located within a 30-foot offer .�f dedication, as shown on the corresponding Parcel Map (Exhibit "F"). D. Gradinq Committee: The Grading Committee reviewed and approved the conceptual grading plan with miner conditions necessary to meet City standards. A final grading plan with the necessary information will be required prior to issuance of building permits. Jr t{ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 12601/Morris & Searles February 8, 1984 Page 3 E. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant. Staff has completed the Environmental Clieckiist and found no significant adverse impacts as a result of this project. If the Commission concurs with these findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The findings listed on the attached Resolution are supported by the following facts: 1. The proposed subdivision, in conjunction with the conditions of approval, is consistent with the current development standards of the City. 2. The project is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed number of lots within the subdivision. 3. Adequate street and storm drain improvements will be provided tG make the project compatible with the surrounding area and improve circulation and drainage in the vicinity. 4. The project is consistent with the General Plan and conforms with the Basic Development Standards of the "LM" District in which the site is located. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Daily Report newspaper d notices were sent to all property owners within an 300 feet of the subject site_ In addition, public hearir,y notices were posted on the property_ To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this rroject. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Pianning Commission conduct a public hearing to consider public input and elements of his project. If after such consideration the Commission concurs with the facts for findings and recommended conditions of approval , adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative De-laration .would be appropriate. Resdettfully submitted, Rick ;Gomez CitylPlanrer r 9G:CJ:jr ` J'"S Jill PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 12601/Morris & Searles February 8, 10,84 Page 4 Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization. Map Exhibit "B" - Tentative Tract Man Exhibit "C" - Detailed Site Plan Exhihi � "D" - Floor Plans & Elevations (4 Sheets) Initial Study, Part I Resolution of Approval with Conditions =X. 641-$ i i r . , ol FORTH CITY OF ITEMS: RANCHO CUC),NL IONCYA TITLE= -:sj76 PL. ONNI NG DI rElON EXHIBIT: SCALE. TFENTATIVE MAP TRACT NO. 1260I n, 'we euty C KL\I o CLe Lr•lewY OLw L I.00,V .f/! MAN n'.n wtu..K Ivy«/a w sfLTMV L.T.I s.fl.,M- e/aR,. K,e ry�tL +uy w w re.r+v.w ti•H Wf 4\`4Rr.n/.Lr. COa.eL,�Y4 K.4YO�b:avr�`nr NLL.LLG Iy1 TT Lo ti I.iC.t1 � G1[.SL/!CG _/ s 'L.s•wv�w u,K..L[eL . rxeli C caL.L.[s •-- � � pLv/YIMV-i. RO.sl.i LC/-. e. I [,M F .y«,.y... 1 L,e_r I �' SrVhL Nwl\. :t-u�,I_.=/I _ • LR«WM.G 11.1Y I I L.vrrna tam 90.. II —e • .-.+ni`".et-c.e.-wL\a.- -,eq!p— � RC—_v Crw.ee c. [LY-,•c-v u. 4wi.. LyrLv ciw+ri.ar[.. w/IP'— SCL'.Oti Y G .4erwr/- Ie�eYl 1JM!co 1 QG e-i ,LIy�VYY �LL:I� lyLWt••M w 1 — I I , L.T [ j . •� Sip—aeeare�n _ :. _ I - -- ill I I I i! I I � I CLi,,:' I ..a.� '. ---� •i � ---1 � r--iI � .i S/ �! NORTH CITY %f :TENT= Rik-NC HO CUC:ATNIONNGA PLkNI NIi G DIVISnN EXHIBIT.--F,-- - SCALE LX�K ,� �' .o'�i1` \�--_-� � �Esitl4o.cY•a.:GtN Fswo - ... I �_ 'Zo _ I 21 $I 22 0, 2--i. I Z6 ..' a ri1 £G — Is"b (i.i, ra• I 1 h' ''� i `✓1 �+ P¢oPOLEv ('u7L:L $TREEi ____ r -� s � C j i9 /i• , � � z,. ;_ "�� � .ei I I _ I �;. '1 � I I, ,c j 1 �I� I�- :--_I�. . 'I``FJ`•y� � I �`; >z u ` I i �.''�"`v'�s�e'...�`I «i / ;,-- 9 & 6 7 - �'•i 5 �i i ` (ess erc.nv.. i40uq . .• - n.nw roc wTV�<j " NORTH CITY. OF rrEm: RANCHO CUCAMO\GA TrCLE: i'c N FL t%.N llNG DIVU90N EXHIBIT-- G SCALE; _ =ter�. � \�I y��� �.� 5GG*r+ •.••' j4T.r-.vM '4Gt •i,wL1,t� files-•.eSi. - -T .. ..w a Mu Y w+-•••�• iif/�/� A-A - f •. . T'••�- O.wvu[v ..T... 0,.+7—w,•wr �.—.t. J ,..may la" •{ �=� � > V' :.T , , Lit L 9z.eill�' O � _ � O Op `� � , J O O 1 it t C : (� :` -; Jr_ I - _ t. � Cat l i � L+�� � .•^ .� i�'. Ae NKXTH CITE' OF ITEM. R ANINCHO CL;C A,,N,10`�'Gr1 PLANNING DIVLSnN EYHIFAT= •IT SCALE: _ I •SO w�• y.. l:L-LY .r i z _ I I I t, NORTH CITY kf-",Iplr,7 ITF-\1: R�` NC CL'..A�'IO\'G.� TITLE: - PI_AINTNI_NK3 DI` !ION EXHiRM SCALE. - v� i I � T•`!{ I v i� V Agilk a... .%b3 .o.. OR q✓ a �[y 'V� 1 . 1 CITY of ITEM: Tl ,coo,-iri cam , RANCHO CUCAMON A TITLE: PLANNING DNISM EXHIBIT- E-z SCAI.E: I I _ v toHT 7! u»_ lee 7 G L I � i it 4 i is tiORTH CITY OF rrF-%l RAIINCHO CLC�N'10\GA ;mom. r-. E.A-77e-^iS PLANNINGDIVISIO��i EXHIBIT: c' SCALE: " - - 1�3 - � ccnT a-e q _ �R mil :«: - � ... � S�• .`I I � M I• I --------------- NR. RTH CITE' OF PLANNLNG DIV -ION EXHIBIT- „E _`� SCALE- TENTATive MAP 1 PARCEL MAP NO 8296 IN tut Llty do RpwCwo rwhmoNW ---—i ---'- Cc"fa a SJeSv:{rm1 O A yR'+{.� A 'ut YC/.•xIM, 4•AT{R N 9EG+.r i. .11..R 'l./.� 1.w. MY. !{nV M wwr m1....✓w i N'<• 'YYu Y..TY L• YIIr ..I Y,.{ yrr<{ AMGW��Y I"^~�-r r � 6CN] L••r0 � .•� w.• /Y. iYIOf.I /u M.W W. O.r�f � \ 1 I _r I. Z.+w{/ 4 nrR I.[G4 1, )w•b ti4 �SJr.�<R'� Lam•• ,•M V.q.=. C.N.OI4 M1.•r 4 4.or-wIOrW<14Ti.raiL. 1 I I I 1 V ./•f •_•< 7. •w I4f M{/MN MC/l�111 �/ f r -, 1 � � 1 I 9.fYC4TT' rp.l I;` L.ua < P!]V r•nn.a/r I<w f.V L I` ILLL�I�JII c...-ree c.<....,. ...o .o..o..�.Le Y,w...,.. � I _j —1--I 1_-__ � rr..•.. `_--"-� �./.-<rs= rirnfv�.f<L..w-nrf•f..w.w.w.� \�( IZ'I Ivi I Imo' i •tf«e-i•Ee G•.aewa... nn ...mwn.�rt�.w wn/ae..Iw ICI I I I I�{ I -.�. ...�y w f ne..•» vr.w1 ]Iera Ytrv<w,- 1 k ..r nrft 1,4G. �IJ'I%l?GF�__'IAN3—� 9s>4E44i IVGVJL L ^-I a� ^a4.. I Fr•f _.1 a I li Ly3 � 'vre 1. Fa - j IIY v / vgR$EL z I I 1 _5 1 °.r r: G: LC G3 •1 ! +I a c It ��RTH I GwRtw f*RLtT j CITY OF rrEm: Rt\aNCI-IO CUCA:'�r10lG rrF�, E� ,Y PL.AINNDC DIVISIUN EXHIBIT. _ - SCALE: 42j p1w _jj \ � I•� rooi w. LZ cuw DO-TAILED SITE PLAIT Itsel '- • J \ j v 1 B-4 • \ I wu'....w ..nan..t.� �..n.•...wr �W !.� V aw.w cu... ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN NORTH CITY OF RANCHO CUGAL IO\GA TiTLE µ`��. ..,_�i�� ��-�-'/-✓�_ „��/ PLk-N,Nl\G QIVOON EV.IBIT= --- _ (O6 , r TR. NO. ?2601 i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TTl V INITIALS+..D f: PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be comple`.e87b00applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $ For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Develop^ent Review Committee through the c.epartment where the oroiect application is made. �Upon�receipt Of this aff will prepare application, the Environmental A-a'Ys- part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will_ meet and take action a° later than ten re the public meeting which time the (10) days befo of project is to be heard. The Co otect will have noesigni- t`zree determinations: 1) Thep j ficant environmental impact and a Negat.-ve Declarat3-On will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impacted, or and An additit onalinfor Reportal Impact information report will be prep should be supp' ied by the applicant g _ iving further in for- ma- plied concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Morris & Searles, 2950 Airway Avenue, Suite B-1 , Costa Mesa, C 9c6 714/957-9292 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED f pal Land 976 '' Rom` J+--- CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: G - 1 Blvd. . Suite 302 Claremont CA 91, 1 r14 4 OCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) I side of Turner Avenue South of Baseline- APtl 1 - LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AMID FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: Undetermined at resent. AMOL V7 — PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT; A development of 27 lots with public streets, containing ., i�gh quality single story detache6 homes. Two. t ree and tour bedroom unit< will range from 1015 square feet to square Beet. ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 4.5 acres. Proposed buildings to i 54 775 �nuaro feot DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS) : The site is vacant of any structures. An existinq citrus grove occupies the property at this time. There appears to a no cultural historical or scenic aspects on the site. a area may contain birds and some —0-nall rodents. The topography is quite corsistant, slo ina southeaster? a approximately a gra e. Tx-.sting uses of surroundina properties: 1-6---EFe--s—c-u—TTT. singe tamily detached homes; east single family detached omes; nort„ singe family ezactie homes and vacant; west two homes various buiidI—ndsand vacant. Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions , which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? No 1-2 f TR. NO. 1260; WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO _ X 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? _ X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. ) ? _ X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? t 180 X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: The site presently contains a grove of citrus trees eich must be removed for the development. IMPORTA\T: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Review COMM-ittee. Date Signature Title Consultant w: 1-3 P�ESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION Jok The ollowing information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamor,cr Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No. : Morris & Searles, Tentative Tract No. 1260 Specific Location of Project: West side of Turner Avenue south of Baseline PH;'.SE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL 1. Number of single family units: 27 2. Number of multiple family units: None 3. Date proposed to begin construction: Spring '84 4. Earliest date of occupancy: Summer '84 Model and # of Tentative S. Bedrooms Price Range =1 2 BR $79,000 =2 3 SR 88,000 =3 3 BR 93,000 4 4 OR 99,000 I-4 dh RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12601 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12601 hereinafter "Map" submitted by Morris and Searles, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as the development of 26 single family detached h�Tn� nn a r a�.-ec nF ianr in the nictrict_ generally located on the west side of Turner at Palo Alto Street - A.PN 1077-031-04, into 26 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on February 8, 1964; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Co=ission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 12601 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easernefit acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. V. � J Resolution No. Page 2 (9) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative . Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 12601, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. The minimum interior dimensions of each garage, excluding laundry area, shall be 13 feet X 19 feet. 2. An alternative design which eliminates the gap between the existinc wall and any proposed wall or fence along the south propert; line shall be submitted to the Planning Division, for review and approval prior to approval of the final grading plan. 3. A block wall and/or fence shall be provided on Lot 16 adjacent to the emergency and secondary access lane subject to the review and approval of the Plannina Division prior to issuance of building permits. ENGINEERING DIVISION 4. A minimum of 20 feet wide asphalt concrete pavement shall be con�-truced along the secondary access from the proposed street to Teak Way. 5. On Turner Avenue the existing PCC pavement shall be removed and replaced with a minimum of 6 inches of asphalt concrete for the length of the frontage. A Reimbursement Agreement or fee credit shall be granted to the applicant for the construction work east of the Turner Avenue centerline. 6. All applicable conditions of approval for Parcel. Map 8298 shall apply to this project. 7. Recordation of a private roadway easement for secondary and emergency access, as shown on the map, shall be recorded prior to or concurrent with the recordation of the Tract Map for the benefit of all the lots within the tract through parcel one (1) of Parcel Map 8298. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary -7a - Resolution No. Page 3 i, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 2th day of February, 1934, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: AR�,FNT. �n%i TCCTnNFPC_ 1 - 73 voa Nva rn— -JP .r a — ua av z+ � a� G� o�P q.. ✓. cqa c� cc c uo� Aco a Lq A n `V c Vl ✓;� a .L. .�� D �mA "'oa N� T —'� ": 'O� Gi' �.an ^ A d_^ Y-J „ L D � 9 C •�Z � A 'J CTCS �..=••L '. d ` Y � N Ld NCTO (d � d TY <_' A = C O d EM N P T o � F S�Y C 7 p c T '�C O L �= T 7 � a A•O• O n' n� _ •^V q W � r� � U <� EL n�_ SOJ^y ru S• dC a^ VW?�- "_' VfJ O ` DPq t n 9 N V C N L A -'C ^ 2 ` Li i Y C O •r L p �' P •' q C V V ^ L_ D p TY N C i O A Cj N O V U a A r r ' V •n A n = V %.O j ^2 O A O ram• I'�u ✓I O = N V A F D d f N S O a C A O N d�.. coN vc A.^v - Llo„ Da —ago Nu A D_ C O .-— O�� O-�� O N ^ ` W �L N N '�y f•d d' V A O'N Y O L L d O�- Y C A ^J S S A •w CI Y r� '� .a� j L L L A P N � N r d n d '• V_ P N N M^` Pr A=r Y Q n L^ L A V_ •- v a <b n N F` ' �� L i N•Ld-'J L W� a �q_� q=n 6 y 9 L ` ^ � n >Q-C' .L. cE Tw � JE •�.L.L N > ` 9 �T cc nLL iC - « >. r T y V V O - N A P O N _ C V d q E G W D > L 9 y `a ya rCf A'��rL 0q �6 V = ! MO l9N O^� LC •^ I' 0��� L .� y0_gU VLC� zc� NPc� K M�•O V G O A m 4 V Ll C A C L n 6 O G V 4 N d L] .0 •�•_m G D I'-P N r 6 r L N O O _ _ i yvcl o II'—Cs L� D <c � c AD m.o„� vDc m� wgq i. N GO W N^ N o v✓ M Y a N ' V n N � � c Lvw_ — a NAP w _ d0 c nY Z c 'o' c n� L,•_ �� c �� 1_ N dL -I = O l 9 rid 2 1 J L4O � uNi� ..� Q iCa YC Ty _d w•r I � 9_ d.n • N = O V O > N N� L ` d Oa n n� 9r Ca] Vef LOd a I O ' TP_ � dA nr q N p yD VA ON C N= N A O D n O n_^ > A; r L C N -•J. V � � 6 OI A C O A L � LL. a l �a _ ^ .✓ 6 4� O d d� T A C N I � '� 4I = n� '- � r V C 'n C r t O c ^•OV N v `N aG. A c.=r Sdr s � d_ nnr 1v{-_/j1'1I'f Vc w L•�a v N •a, r w a L A Y�p O u C = C 1 '`IL J V OCFr OCL rq V'-I NV rJ d sCd V V K Ad6 C F = CAP V C_- O [ r y O O O O O6 d O A O O L V Y G• , •• a In -- L L n ,I Mj. A — y u �` l f^C'u �rLL - rOy N� T�W I� �d �J Y�J ✓ ` q ��t A C C V 9 a 7 C N O C ✓ U O V d T> C C C !� P W �N rt r C L� � r � N L—✓'� 9— C U. .^ 6 y u A A L c�, L N N V A�� O O ^ U V 4^ N G✓ u f� O[.✓ tr:J O rL A�f7 y1.3 0> . ✓ Om �r r rur CC ' r A F F L U �G.u�� P.�^ — S C O •o A� V m p 9 = .oNc u `L' ` ua � _;✓ ad E� m ,W„c-q 'U PW 4`:� Aq •' L !'na` n�c.�< u Too cL c` dt q ✓✓ to O4 c_s= "�-o• G L '^ E c w .✓ ✓a mU i � rcu'a a� Ada m T-L NO ` �9 me c'^ oyyr q r-' C F c� CO FC'��_ aC. Fln— [q'•_ Cr rL C.N..rNiS�L yC NZ L � E tl y q" C v� CC u d A C V =.O� U� E .G p q V• ^ O L q C ��d lip� dAN ` OLg FO✓�✓V. �t ^ AO ` 9 O ' < N E 7 E O M^�N•L 6 9 .� <'�^ C d �J N.d.. 2 d t G G P V r. A C O 2 V q d 7 O• O.N.i O - O c 4".� ^ ESL `� Wo' - <��•rCca ` c ^ • G rL a•^ rc OTA „•N u r L [ C a l A o o O �N J^ O C a q P C .`O T✓ G C O C� A d 9 N B O O N 6L G a Lo oL aL o' d m go.`va G.N. -9 d�a?&- �Nq.e ii�d '° .'.• 1✓u ` OA �� NL.t..��p gc � OW,c_^ndEi Oy•r^^N` yC�L ��`<r V� �vIC ` �Q TINY u.J'OQ LC �=•• gr LOL C �NnAG 4�r Owq.r uOGTL � Sr0 O c L ✓ _ u c c C N o a-+ .�'�- '° c- .._ c-a d � ``c t c c^ V C O C T O V A d 9 r O V d N P C O L L V• ^ V t r 0 • ✓ c C > _ r P O A N V q � y V C r�y V d ✓ W V�y G c N C q u J C A t.l O _ — ,O G•e— C 6CV � V ' drAVLy9 � ZW _ C > V ` u• COtl y GN N u r Q= d O O » C�� O N ✓ O C L `a tiM GC CE.+G a GOL GG 6� Z �n.- — 6— VA69IN LA Sr '^NL � QCN N � I � _ 1 •I 1 6I ^I 0 N aT q 26 �T9•r�" VCd 90 ]yd _ C' dr�N ^ `O � � GV A O✓ q L L y C u V u C A �C 75 � Oo^� yxj�. Cl OOl _lT N'`ala 0'• A O A rtl� dT m G6Nx 494^ 6' rE t V daA— N —y c q a V _ •"' M N V� A u V' 'E L _'� •n V q •C j q r W u •J'u .' V ^ ✓l A_^ L C � —tl� U O T N r d M O F u .? t W 9 V G C N N Q O 9 ` - a L O Lj � 9G dGOqzj P� 6' NCq L a n — a POL q vN _ d Cam.• C C O — 0q u — 0 d U d O F O C C j N a 9 V F ry O L V qPd Vv •r NN C (� C� TG N A _ v✓- o c L _ -.icovv. ocl..� _ ara�a�v is cL F CN tl Wtlm � R� dr C m� x r iU LO.q 'a C_ ? tl �, — ONP 9ETOOrOi VW C`x — T �✓ ag __ - n� cA CL cr o cv �c c c E _ G � � ✓ C C i •' I P 6 c U dP � [� l Cml `? PC� L < q^ CV ✓ C= O Ci_C � � NV � _ � i✓_ 'i C U .O. .n A D O .. L c m✓ m r C 6� V � C va..= y3 U a a• GL C - O Cj U to L G C U V 9_ A G L `1 O r N C- C✓2 7 V FO 7� � C •� V Z V <•� g L � N V •O F L A B u_ C A � V 4 ` ^ L C `9 d 2✓_ c F .n C _ dy Tr rr AC•rC c N `� O � nO.r N CgCP ✓9L al 7�� > CC^ OyuNU GC ^-C C' A >�G� qV L ,^ 4 V ^. <• q O u_T di O d•a V d_ p L_d .O/• V d u T C: '2••• c P O N ` C r y Y d L —N L N q 6 V <V Q N— N �r O� G N L N V �• 7 U ^D✓ d N 9 u �V 9 C r O N— q �u �WC q .rn= „q� d .9 ' �^ OG� i6• O• ON 4 ^a o c O'L V.O.rq 4 NOd O zz « C ^ qc 3JL C r= V .Oi�4 OC> TOJV Dd�� Ll •e _ u q L L_ T N �. . N r .� O E L...O Od T2 `9C ACC C� O.0 SpNVU `d PO. � Cq=y �•> G� �9D,[ � LdA rL�i ✓ LL OC r ^ � O_ L � Nq �r uLaC )r P 9 >� 7C „ 2 Ad qCN LSM C P6 r O O.N �` NO PyNV.O.r dL CL Oy Cq.r ` C.9 VO `• LLdV VMf q LC � p C O C q�r qw GD qp u O � .L.C� O E NAUO"C '� " C � LH�W L� L N✓_r •'�V^r Z: Vv C. LdO 6N O LC S V9 � O ^ d0 AND pL 6„9 H� O F• 9r qr ^ O O � m P ® M 94 OC �n q �A O.Y ga� � O GLZV � � Ca• NL 4 rC �- 6H �00 any qd `D Y LV VYN 4 FA wdi d l T✓ v uND rx N \o 43 ` CC V� A > C lAC VNVOr VO 2 W'.y P4O J" U O • u V �C 6 6 6 N V O C v d V V C v L O d ` q N r q EE c s� _.r t c Pr ud� nDL �q r Lr� N �._oopv ACD 2 .—"' OO L2L.. D.r qJ CC Pjp 4' La'VVa P N •p✓ v_ _ _ L� N C O T O O r O L C 9 rNY L •� ~ NC CLOA �L��^ LG� C=r'•i r ^ G C aQVg00 _r � p OPN ✓ V CG —VUC qrC nG E uT ✓ '�� �V d C [+r ^O O w 4 d d r O l q N.�.. G � O� O V O L O S M O G D Iq{, y O•H 2 .2 rr90 �T.`u9 \ jN0 F5= 6P� OOp ^ 2 Nr Ga0•[ a` = OL �^ L r^ O • C— < <TJ O S C < Gq O � N \n � •C ` -•S7C _uNW N ^ ^•O O u rC. � i6 qrF 4y t,^ C0G• ` C GO GW 7r VG b * d O� 4� Z rtGW GCQF o ^..� iD Q4 a "c"' y n_ iaccr Y SMr` � u .n � V G� � pr �q grJrrO 1 TCq ^ ` du _i �O DV qr O_ y Tn q T iu nd• - c -�+ qa Rio T O q O ^ n „ E • i p C G_ a O u� =n �' u W q u G c�`'u G � d ^� - d E .T.q .Oe q� C 6•w O O p c^'° `" >.d v� cu O '^ E� � ' p ^cJ pPgi uL ar o�.• ad _ ?"_=is" J G•.+- p � � L �� _� G=-- Boa �_r .. c ` o> cc � tP r M -^ vic•uur rc oq u •i� C r rn= O •. u_ 'J V V L F N L N 6 Q V V, d 4Cd M dQ TT v Z = LO NV C •.� O� 6u Qrri V �^ Sa O� IOi'QCiC6 NiGC� V ^ ~ 1� 9 yw tau VrV C OoGprO � q E. 00^ rnV OT•+ ^V q `� V _P CrLL P•O+ O� OOVdM� Parr PV LO_ u^ > d�W r^ V E T •.r �r � T � P� �V P r C L^L^� ^ a P�Or Ouo •O OJ^ r d =' > q� uC0 Tp q QVVOrN �^Y L a 6� p•JWrn 6�T�0 N ruI nV� WN^ WVV 76 V� pTGr LTV GVVO N� ^, •� Y C � r L qd -rP d TT>• U rr a C�-J ¢d^ O C L lzc V o w E.L...Tr q _ c I � I ' V V �- - j crp •' rW V_ qE i c, I q Ly n uq 'c d i o rrrV`o T = T I n ` •^W ciao' _ I (yx V pDL rOr P i L Crn E� _ Pdt L ur 9yuiuV CEO I ^ V V V AC N p >-• a d I qQ .z TnUO I > O ` qcW OW -• W� p 1 I Gi � C =��m u �j vC_ � ` � I �'•V+� d � E 'aT m e Ei_ � rrT• Oo Wc� J c cS' ' F�� ,e i d- ^ w c e d O N� O G O W aUi ; j✓o� ^r` c 4 _o p _ u c c qn •. ' o O I > E n r J W ¢W q D W d EO i' L 40.r C J .Li O C T r I N rir p^ V_ C u G r C •-.r T � r I � �= O S V r0•.r T �•' C u0 CiV rr. C I _ T_ d GC �u '•' V C6 C �r _ O^ p[ T V = ' Jq iG• G �^V i Au� CV^q ~ I q o r m r 6t V T r i C• r ' C V V V T -' a c yrd : i m t c• ocu s c PC i�c c� i F I oG` V.�.. '_ � >p, c �•'.�c i ti`c ` d' rrE a c r oo TW .. 00 jai- Ic.. c vG+ aNc yi. ` o ^= ve o>� � a c d enn Gc i• ^+ am vc cor �� q i^ O O PL E P l V C ` G 6•! - TI L I' Cr fj p� GO y 6 d V q C I ` ZirNG Or o �VWI u r r 6 6•.r 6 dr _ r YI GI � N 6 \/v'� fM `\F\/ \fv�j N r0 CI 6'i\•J ^I •� `11 - 1 ` I II I I �I Cr I 1 V' '4: 9 � .( � N_G L N _ � d Gr J� � � ✓ � �� = I I µ N T T ` q `y � ^O O O� •J y = �� O .. � I cco awN - ✓ a � ce.N.G 8✓ = I � I Z ` a � T= �a Pn _ 6 � ✓ ova a ` b.— [) •'� d A N� C M O 'a � d T O � > V N �L d CVa I N I > g dfO C _C = LOL Ey - cov �_� ac I JJ ! 1 C O V ' n N✓--.. qq d ' W Ogg �L ^ NS ✓ Vp—� NC 6d dy d LO•N C — ` q > � G >00 L O y q^ O ✓ N tq CN 1CyI `ju J � � r Q \j ' C LO �q^ J6 u^ soE Nid -v --d u i� cCC'u Ep. cE � v 6q i C nr6 6 q 40L WS gNpC GL VI '^ O PI Iz! PL•J u� T L O✓ -P-N Vab TccP�N d 9 C` C T u O✓ A C qn - ✓ ✓ C L l N� r b� L n L d G d N U d N a U >� ✓ C- d C P ai o S V T A- 4 N P .ui r O u fj G d S T S C FF O q PQ N - Cd SDC •J�q`� L�Q � y�a GO 'rq O q ` d— C E a _ D L�v C n V L i ✓M T =i L �I I � S - 6 J ✓ _ —L A C u S L a O _ P 6: 4 2.2 Sc P 4 d Q O O T O _L u✓ q T ` r✓ a 2 —N O_S O- S cc u O l o - N d� '..i✓— nod j ^J�✓— E � ud `� m L 4 d y ` q L LO L q Ga D —.J C O L C _ _ a r.•.. L � q 9Z L 9 O o L n O N C ✓ V^ t O L N^ t _ ✓ • L L ✓ N r '•^ r � r A i`c v > 'n N "' ric E rq N o ko D _ q G G € C u C47, J - o i' - Ic G M O—'O g v O C C d O C L P C y O y —r v _I N q ✓ 1 q 6 GOJ LO rY � CN P JOB= P u! L CN I E O - q u O Nr �' > y TC-0- -~ n-�r La ^• '� Vq �� I ed OP S� ndTJ > ON >Ap C^— N F _ 11` in lC .rJi �iv. 6o .c•o rSn- E= � DJ a � �� a it T > qe �oLa ¢ o oPT o� Yo _ N N C M O l • t q D V C d >•� TI C O O� I I VC C• OI OI L J O O I - C O d q .d..O ✓ V � 'V d 7 - ✓ V q � i N T'J � — c1 tT I VTR rV La GU I JV V.> ✓ I i i n ✓ ^ N o� c LLo `>' uc c J cy I 4_^L V_ � D 4 O 9 I C O_ G N I N G V C_ • 5 rI i..+ T 1 6iN C iq r0 6 "PLOT PC I V_ d - dN H-C n(/ nL C 9 I PW rJ ci a 2 � V 45 C q T N L2r( T = V T ✓ 14 51 `I s .u. ! o n e " E v� .u. � e �1I� n'G �_r I �i.�'' ✓^ ^ J oy} I ! ^! o Ir ` r c ice. m`m r � ooaay N 4 Ip iN. LrN LLML h yP0 ` L VVL .n P ` y G1Z N _ O D✓ 9 L _ L N am" a l •^ Ncn �, r e u��, r L ^—Y cT. i �y L. " n v .Go � +� oq_ c -•___ c c G, _= ` T> o .� V J q C' ✓9 y G� <_ V � 7� G> N O .... C NO V G_�.. N 9 G O Fr "E4 u= c a c-' 9 \c G I � c +`• c—N= no > c Ty V <`o _ I = qd Gri. c`✓ d9 V. � s nN a� aC rr �. � ❑_ n ✓ ' 0 � 2C VCj.. V_ '^�'_\u nV OE Oi _o nC C6 PU• i" 6C^ � C c � IT c .. 0 � ne'•e Tc =c o'9L T= E ` �. J _ Ot 'L LW ` dV= LLD NVD7 '^y ✓ .Lr= LW � G [� `C^P N^ � N -r :C O m.Ti V n^V 9 G n•- d r n'J U L V F T � C.^�J V g N ��! O n LNr ` ICCO N6n CD ULr CdU ^_✓ >.n -� \ C�r �9 C4 e - 79 - c \I O Z _ Y UCY O i 0. ✓ � 9 6 q L I � G r_ .J O K ✓ 4 L '^ i i I W o c`� _•� b v = v I � I� v - O _ ✓ _ u I I V _ O�J d V =L ✓ � CI ✓ _ V Ti I �C V —r d_ ' d✓ 4 d rC'-� o do.07 _ o✓ 09� ` `� `1 o o j oo cL dyy 6 • /1 � � • 1 VI � � ^I I �� v E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA G `^1onr f STAFF REPORT Zuw/ cry 0 vI O y'I I�a a DATE: F_bruary 8, 1984 r 197, I TO: Planning Commission I FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer bY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8298 - MORRIS & SEARLES The division of 9.Z2 acres of land into 2 parcels within the-Tow medium (LM) residential district generally located on the west side of Turner Avenue,south of Base Line Road APN 1077-031-4 6 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of Parcel Map. B. Purpose: To divide 9.22 acres of land into 2 parcels. Parcel 2 to ® be developed as Tract 12601, is also on tonight's agenda for tentative approval . C. Location: West side of Turner Avenue, south of Base Lire Road D. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 - 4.67 gross acres Parcel 2 - 4.55 acres E. Existing Zoning: low medium residential district. F. Existing Land Use- Parcel 1 - three single family homes within an orange grove Parcel 2 - vacant G. Surrounding Land Use: North - existing single family - low residential district South - existing single family - low residential district East - existing single family - low residential district West - vacant - low medium district H. Surrounding General Plan and Development Code Designations: North - low residential district South - low residential district i East - low residential district West - low-medium residential district ITEM I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Environmental Assessment and Parcel Map 8296 February 8, 1984 Page 2 I. Site Characteristics: Parcel 1 contains three single family homes within an orange grove. Parcei 2 is vacant. The property slopes southerly at approximately 2% grade. II. ANALYSIS: This project divides 9.22 acres of land into 2 parcels. Ta-r—c—e-77 is the site for Tentative Tract 12601 also on tonight's agenda for tentative approval. No additional development is proposed on Parcel 1 at thic time As shown on the attached tentative parcel map, an easement to be used for e,:=,"gency access to serve parcel 2 is required. An offer to dedicate the westerly 30 feet for future extension, of Teak Way is also required. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Also attached for your rev ,, .r and consideration is Part I of the Initiai Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Upon completion and review of the Initial Study and field investigation, Staff found no adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the proposed subdivision. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input and elements of the project. If, after such consideration, the Commission can support the recommended conditicns of approval as written in the City Engineer's Report, then adoption of the attached resolution would be appropriate. It is also recommended that a Negative Declaration be issued. Respe tfully submi ed, LBH:BK:jaa Attachments: Map - Tentative & Vicinity Resolution City Engineer's Report Initial Study `Vey Zz - iiz 1'Z Y` V t- 1 Z V ., n � � ♦ a.� ' I I'm i 1 I 4.ri w i0G + N' i �rr I � 11F. Ir1T'11t+ , .I ,i 1 i -+ _ i CAUL , LANE 1 � 1. � i. JJ � {j IJl-..J .�_z.-i-' ' ' II It -� I �� 1 � 7• L��,�I{� ti I � Li } ' 1l 11. .• . ', _' '..�...�'�! ' I it II '�( ! 1 , vITI , CITY OF RANC:10 C('CA,%IONGA title; P.M. 8298 jZ ENGINEERING DIVISION 19:7 VICINITY MAP �T f P.M. 3298 . � t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be -ompleted by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87. 00 For all prcjects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Commit,-ee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: !(one APPLICANT' S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: tiorris u Searles , 2950 Ainaay Avenue, Suite 3-1 , Costa Mesa, C L 26 7i4/S'57-9292 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Ed Greer of Cal Land. 976 Foothill Blvd. , Ste. 302. Clarer..ont CA 91711 714/946-9124 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCT�*i. NO.) ttest side of Tarner Avenue south of Baseline: APNI 1077-031-4 _ LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS : None known at present I-1 J i PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Create a. divided interest on nroperty currently e a in mu tip a ownership and to create a new parcel for aevelopmen,, purposes. ACREAGE, OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 4.5 acres of project area. Existing buildinn-, rnn+>i.. 8"-r-x ma-cly 'T CTn=_ FBI �- - rr a� . ', — Su. 1L. 3 houses i barn s e garage o builcings are proposed within this land division DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF TF.E PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORIC�I. OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS) : The site contains 3 houses, 1 barn, 1 shed and 1 garage The majority —a or the property is occupied with citrus trees. There appears }o be no cultura , historical, or scenic aspects on the site. Birds and some small rodents nay inhabit the area. Topography is quite consis`ant sfo in genera y sou*. easter y at approximately a 27 grade Existing uses or surrounding properties_ to the south and east single family homes; to the north, single family homes and vacant; west, 2 homes various cut buildings and vacant. Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? No 1-2 r: (' F.M. s29s WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO l 1. Create a substantial change in ground — contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing kf noise or vibration? 1 X 3. Create a substantialder nand change in deand for !!! -•-- . ^ip l ser<rices t_pn7.icer fire. water. sewage, etc. ) ? X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X S. Remove any existing trees: How many? _ X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances , flamma_+les or explosives -' Explanation of any YES answers above :_ IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements , and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can he made by the Development Review Committee. Date (1- l1 -g3 Signaturec'�� �� Title Consultant 1-3 i' RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Gr- THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA., CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 8298 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 8298 LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF TURNER AVENUE, SOUTH OF BASE LINE ROAD WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 8298, submitted by Morris and Searles and consisting of 2 parcels, located on the west side of Tu nor Avenue, south of Base Line Road, being a division of a portion of the c--dc-., 2 T1^ OTa C R R an11 Smith 7 /9 of Lot 5, Section 2 recorded as Cucamonga Fruit Land Co.; and WHEREAS, on November 22, 1533; a formal application was submitted requesting reviaw of the above-described Tentative Map; and WHEREAS, on February 8, 1984, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above-described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse environme:ata� impacts and a Negative Declaration is issued on February 8, 1984. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 8298 is approved subject to the recommended Conditions of Approval pertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1984 . PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman. ATTEST: Rick Uomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of February, 1984, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS- NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECOVENDED COMBIT104S OF APPROVAL LOCATION: 'West side of Turner, south of TENTATIVE PARCEL MAi' NO: 8298 Base Lire Road _ DATE FILED: 11/22/83 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: portion of the North- NUMBER OF LOTS: 2 west 1/4 of Section 2 T1S, R7W, S.B.B. GROSS ACREAGE: 9.22 and South 1i2 ui Lit 5, Section 2 raca_rded ;ISSESSOR oAR- an. 1n:._nZ1_a as Cucamonga Fruit Land Company DEVELOPER OWNER ENGINES;I!SURVEYOR Morris & Searles Loren Sanchez James 1-.angene 2950 Airw� Avenue 862 Buffington 869 West "G" Street Suite B-1 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Upland, CA 91786 Colton, CA 92324 Improvement and dedication requirements in accordance with Title 16 of tie Municipal Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga include, but may n^- oe livmited to, the following: Dedications and Vehicular Access 1. Dedications shall be made of all interior street rights-of-way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. X 2. Dedication Shall be made of ti.- i allowing rights-of-way on the following streets: additional feet on T1- -ner Avenue Offer to dedicate for the west 3CF of °A-r_ol 3. Corner property line radius will be required per City Standards. 4. All rights of vehicular ingress and egress shall be dedicated as follows: 5. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all common roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by C.C.&R.s and shall be recorded concurrent with the map. -i- 6. All existing easements lying within future right-of-way are to be gjitclaimed or delineated on the map per City Engineer s requirements. 7. Easements `or sidewalk for public use shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. Surety X 1. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the city Engineer and City Attorney, guaranteeing completion, of the public improvements prior to recording for Parcel 1 and 2. 2. A lien agreement must be executed prior to recording of the Tap for the followina: 3. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed, guaranteeing completion of all on-site drainage facilites necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Divisor prior to recordings for and/or prior to issuance of building permit; Street Improvements PursLant to the City of Ranch Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title 16, Section 16.36. 120, the subdivider may enter into an agreement and post security with the City guaranteeing the required construction prior to recordation of the map and/or building permit issuance. 1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, K.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. 2. A minimum of 25-foot wide pavement within a 40-foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be constructed for all half- sect-ion streets. X 3. Construct the following ':;sing improvements: Prior to recordation for Parcel 1 and 2 Curb IS, A.C. ide- Drive Street trees + A.C. Meoiar. Street Name Gutter Pvmt. Walk Appr.� Trees ( Lights iOverla lOtheri Turner X X X X ; X X X + *Includes landscaping and irrigation or meter -2- t. X 4. Prior to any work, being performed in the public right-of-way, tees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. X 5. Street improvement plans shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. X 6. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. X 7. Existing lilies of 12KV or less fronting the property shall be undergrounded. X 8. Install appropriate street name signs, traffic control signs, striping and markings with locations and types approved by the City Engineer. X 9. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Lights shall be on decorative poles with underground service. X 10. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of ® building permit. 11. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Undersidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards. Drainage and Flood Control 1, Private drainage easements for crows-lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated or noticed on the final map. X 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering Vie property from adjacent areas. 3. The fcllowing storm drain shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 4. Prior to recordation of the map, a hydrologic and drainage study for the project shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review. 5. A drainage detention basin per City Standards shall be constructed to detain increased runoff Grading X 1. Grading o` the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Builting Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading plan. X 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified en,;neer licensed by the State of California to perform such work prior to issuance of buiiding permit. 3. A geological report shall b-� prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application or grading plan cn eck. 4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Grading Committee and shall be completed prior to recordation o• the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit whichever comes first. 5. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of bui iding permit. General Requirements and Approvals X 1. Permits from other zgencies will be required as follows: CalTrans for San Bernardino County Fl000 Control District Cucamonga County Water District for sewer and water San. Bernardino County Dust Abatement (required prior to issuance of a arading permit) Other 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (C.C.&R.$) approved by the City Attorney is required prior to recordation of the map. X 3. Provide all utility services to each lot including sewerage, water, electric power, gas and telephone prior to street constructon. X 4, Sanitary sewer and water syst=_r,Is shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. X 5. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CalTrans/San Bernardino County Ficod Control District. X 6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. n 7 X 7. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will, be asked to certi,y the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. 8. Lo:al and Master Planned Trails shall be provides in accordance ;pith the 'Frail Plan. A detailed trail plan indicating widths, maximum s4opes, physical conditions, fencing and weed control, in accordance with City trail standards, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to recordation for and/or prior to building permit issuance for 9. Prior to rer_or, og, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District 82-1 among the newly created parcels. X 10. At the time of final map submittal, the following shall be submitted: Title Report, traverse calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and/or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. X 11. • Secondary access easement shall be provided by separate instrument as shown on the Tentative Parcel Map. This easement should remain in force until a permanent public access is provided for Parcel 2. X 12. Removal of all concrete paving in Turner Avenue is required, a. reimbursement agreement shall: be granted or fee credit at time of building permit issuance for the construction of the east side of Turner Avenue. CITY OF RANCHO CUCA OHGA LLOYD B. HUBBS, CITY ENGINEER by: -5- CITY OF R)INCHO CUCAMONGA C,'`CAMOV STAFF REPORT DATE: February 8, 1984 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission I FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner I BY; Curt Johnston, Assoc:ate Planner i SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT 11915-1, -2, -3 - CROWELL - A revision to the Tentative Tract Map to a 3 lot subdivision, for condominium purposes for 150 dwellings on 10.69 acres of land located at the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Turner Avenue - APN 209-091-11. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: the purpose of this request is to revise the Tentative Tract Map from a townhouse configuration, which creates separate lots for the ground beneath each unit (Exhibit "C"), to a map for condominium purposes which simply shows a tot for each phase of the project (Exhibit "B") . No physical changes to the site plan, building designs or conditions of approval are requested with this application. I II. ANALYSIS: The amendment to the map will not affect the physical nature of this project. The three lots shown on the proposed map follow the phasing lines indicated on the approved site plan. In addition, the proposed map still provides for owner occupied units. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The proposed revised subdivision map, in conjunction with the original conditions of approval, site plan, and building design is consistent with the current development standards of the City and the General Plan. In addition, the project will not be detrimental to properties or improvements in the immediate vicinity. 17. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Dail Report newspaper and notices were sent to all property owners wit in feet of the subject site. In addition, public hearing notices were posted on the property. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. "1 G ITEM J PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REFORT Revision to Tentative Tract 11915-1, -2, -3 February 8, 1984 Page 2 V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to consider public input and elements of this project. If after such consideration the Commission concurs with the facts for findings, adoption of the attached Resolution would be appropriate. Respectfu)ly submitted, Rick P.dmez`J / City Plannar RG:CJ:jr Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "C" - Proposed Tract Map Exhibit "C" - Previously Approved Tract Map Exhibit "D" - Zotailed Site Plan Exhibit "E" - Illustrative Site Plan Resolution of Approval t J I IWI � L s'E III! ICI �' i ICI l� i 7. IT NORTH CITY Or ITEM: f { 5�z--� RAI CHO CLC.A,k\IC\Gk TITLE: (,eoCA-1100 �1R PLANNI\G DIVISION EXHIBIT:_- SCALE:-�-� -q'1 - TENTATIVE MdAP TRACT N 2 1 1915-2 i ,w TwC GTY OrRWCMp NcalCWL_COv.aTS 0���l,RL'w4m,..0 TR SC MGW�Ot•.J .fw�f...s.er.�wea. , .•ww..v ,.a.sx.ws„T�rr+.awrwe uu+..sL..�.w.nsro..•..R•errwe..r�. •.L..wLo w ..[weo •o.� —=y)3 Fl MLa W C.v.i.OlMR..gtp DOILa.n�as ,Oii CR<Owat.L. aratY�LC►to...u•a� YR.wO.L4r•yyf NTN WrfL A. ,K.wD.U. �T,.• f.f-ip ,M1.1 fN,-q., O,i,R.•.alpw{y MrRv.�_._a..o.•T y T., FOR OOE2120 VIINIUM PURPOSES �.. _ARROW 1•.i ROUTE -� I .L NORTH CITY OF ITEM: RANCHO CLCANTMO\NGA TITLE: PL.ANTMINC DIVISION EXHIBIT: t4gw SCALE: _ fig 't.. i sIs t ` , - . �I _• -••. - i ' ECG}����� � � • �� : . • �� � f 1Frwr.t�' � V � t• � � rcn�r a ' ��� ` • Lei ; �. .. r . „rN_,_... cc t� �mot_ � � - • t II/ F we . • c^il�' ALF NORTH CITY OF ITEM: RANCM CUCAMONGA TITLE: PLANNING DIVNQN EXHIBrr:--�---SCAL.E- Y� i ut ho iw ME , . 'ay • • • • 1 .. r , r , t r .t J r !t .,t : 1 . may- ... .- •��'-"�'.. .. �O'��I D�'if' r�•s�j,4��` 1 �• •• ;i'i; sG ' 'Se iGt' • I ��WIU9IWAU R M ,' � yw0' Re 111 `• OM'KINA KNEE Mat go • m,,,t°� ��I�nill � o• �l �� 'I� ° i ���n ,�ria•.. s; X' � o� at ��3jJ ... .: � ill ��G`�.���R/_J,7Ta•� h'9. - � ram.-r•f ��bc%•/=1�?.� .eta► . „�r/M����I����,- a _ O`w ��i�=� R a o s�Qa 61AN D � f G���'/•il/RE�UTIO�0. 83-132 �i/(/`\ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 11915 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 11915, hereinafter "Map" submitted by The Robert Mayer Corporation, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a residential subdivision for a total planned development of 44 zero lot line homes and 150 townhomes on 17 acre in the P_�/DD 1.. tod on th. na�t isle �F Tern or between Ar .. _s one, ca s • , „ r� Route and 26th Street into 48 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on October 26, 1983; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: a SECTION 1: The Planning Commission make_ the following findings . in regard to Tentative Tract No. 11915 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The desigr of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, new of record, for access through or use of the ,l property within the proposed subdivision. Resolution No. r �- Page 2 ` (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts en the environment and a Negative Declaration . is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 11915, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Staf.dard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. The conditions of approval for Planning Areas A & C of Tentative Tract 11915, as listed in Resoiution 82-27, shall not apply, and are superseded by the following conditions and attached conditions. 2. Dense landscaping and berating, including vines and thorny shrubs, shall be planted against all perimeter walls and fences. 3. Access to the Deer Creek Channel, as shown An the approved site plans, shall be provided in accordance with City Council Resolution No. 81-93. Details shall be included in the final construction package to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 4. Details and typical elevations of wall and fences shall be included in the final construction package. Perimeter walls and fences shall be decorative and include such features as columns, texture treatment and trim cap. 5. The townhomes shall be provided -with trees between garage doors to tLe satisfaction of the City Planner. 6. The townhomes shall include horizontal siding material on all ground floor end elevations. 7. The townhomes shall be provided with planter boxes on upstairs windows per approved elevations. B. The townhome driveways shall be provided with textured paving crosswalks to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 9. The townhome project entrances shall be provided ided With security gates subject to approval the Ineriff's Department and Foothill Fire District. r.c 1.- Page 3 a 10. The zero lot line home front yard landsc4ing, and an appropriate irrigation system, shall be installed by the developer in accordance with submitted plans. Said front yard landscaping shall include an average of two `ifteen gallon tree- , in addition to street trees. The zero lot line homes shall be provided with return fencing between each unit. 11. The zero lot lire homes shall provide a variety of treat-ent distributed throiunhout the project. ENGINEERING DIVISION -12. Construction of off-site improvenents beyond a phase boundary are required at the discretion of the City Engineer as needed for drainage and traffic safety and shall be bonded for prior to recordation of that phase. 13. All median islands at the entrance of the private access roads shall have a setback of a minimum of 5 feet from the right-of-way line. 14. The following street improvements beyond the center 1ir2s of the following perimeter streets are required to the satisfaction of the City Engineer: a. Turner Avenue - Existing PCC Pavement shall be removed and be replaced with a�nhalt concrete pavement of minimum 6 inches thick. This work will be subject to credit towards System Development fees or other reimbursement by the City. b. Arrow Highway and Center Street - Reconstruction or asphalt overlay of the existing pavement shall be required depending on the design to provide standard cross slope on the reconstructed street. 15. All streets within the zero lot line pertion shall have a minimum of 50-foot right-of-way and shall be dedicated to the City. 16. All drainage runoff from the project area west of Deer Creek shall be conveyed directly to the Deer Creek Channel through pipes or existing inlets on 26th Street. Resolution No. Page 4 l 17. Permits will be required from San Bernardino County Flood Control Dist; ict to connect required storm drains to Deer Creek Channel . APPROVED AND D.DOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1963. P.Af7NING-CO'.•IMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. tout, "h rman mac,_ ATTEST: Secretary o t e annzng Commission I, JACK UV4, Izecretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Ranch:, Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly intronuced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the ® City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of October, 1983, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COWjISSIONERS: REMPEL, NCNIEL, BARKER, JUnnEZ, STOu, NOES: COKMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COVVISSIONERS: NONE COVV NCr Pam_ tPC� ..• lU - V 4u9 � ad Jp OrC `-- 1 �• a � 9 0 C E 'C-� V l P 7 V H - O v V C •� J •� D � Q r L a 6 r C g J r N q u G ti B O G IT N N O. N' d TC V _J '�r �/L pLd COpV •rGP NL vM r d J C 9 9 C p d q I G r N N� > V � n U Nn = rLS 4C y .0i. C_d ^J • ^C O E S�V •n O • d��^ ` n� t �y T J - Z u N n rd •r V4� daw. b•. d NFr � y� 0 .w-Da - r9 � VO G nC V + V DPn ` v dr.. CJ an a D= Tr C.Y CB01 V NFij ` d9 N y O•• d Y C o i C - ~ N �•n y •? 'LiO -O •Gw Oyu 6� CC qQ �`Y �LN� 9 Fd Gr �aD 72 N C N C G N O t • N V O r 'r C n ^ d L N V V 9 S O V O L i0 V L E.� •c V 1 P d g d n r p L Q N O a N PC NCG C•• L g NN qy '�_ fIC V GPI O� 'wN 6^ O PrQ ` ��GM ya LJy CC -r P•• M V7CN VC.L.• an O.yp ^-J O 00 p Q�L•= d � IO _LC NO JO NCL ut_y - <` Cq y yTC�a 00 OJ ^_ V q vp^ •LiCOE 9�C OTN4 �+ YL y-•na8 VV� CC 4L �` V uL - L D ein LI - ^•<on r�yU Cra d _ M G�OS - Oi N.1 _ PC •• dC E CVDCd 0 O` >V t E Ca 14 C rc^ pyre L o oath d L _ ioe .aa > r. rV >r 4c Y Gaa .Nu HLr�.o 6N- O 6C 6VD 6•edLO 47GV <NaL 6 �arO GG 0'^ Ld o J_= C = T �I a 4 L c c 0 o o z > c � C �� d V C V O > M 9 q p • YYYVVV++.ri 6i C C r. N L .L..• NIC�� 6 VL rV' L > l .-nr r• 6 2O V�r � I G V O J� _ d•J C '� N yr 4 � V, 'i ��. O Y e V_ P i i .e i O �.Jr• E G N �a L� ?a`ncqN- e N -� -- -= ' 4- - N'^ c c Q- O y r• �' I �y '� __ 4 CGa cN _ .eL V ac> y fJ gP a \.ai•` Pd > P- q C+ rI �w p N rz M-6 y M O C C F L C P C S O a V C r t Y Z2 yO Yp 11 N A f Y•1 4` ' N I Os , m q p ^Od ^P« .WL J - rT✓ ll yyL•] Y✓... LN \- - -J CO b0 N e yry etc NL - fan c .� o o _ _ �.✓ � ovu_Y . c ac pc `` o� Naarq L�-y' tLG V�1� V C q 0 l O P l Q� � O n N•J O N G� -J N O l N g O_V 6 q p q r � L � Ery ti- v✓ G c µv c o Y aj�: o.yp u- u_- .a s .J � oc n- q C✓ C V r N G ✓ VVu qAL I-r N Vim.-.N� - ` LV_ L6 Ey i n ✓ adi E..rV Or�u9r0'yG O O q -r.0+ N rc. aN� N y �✓ � �-' -G`r�L.P..�^ -o .° � Igo.-'.-�-✓ � n c .°cJ' L p - ".✓ ViL'byy EE .yi. jObi✓L ELn ✓-' V a .� : cam En V 7 O i..i EV r- NWD 9. V O d Q rG CLpO > .> 011b Cy ` � G�� G? �i Nr _ O O 0 Li.Z V g• 6 -O L j -�L.` l D C C C - q C l .. _ Z. O = + 'VirG VL U`QV� pdTrV q0 ` O_9 •OV _ ' Ord elq d ✓ j 9000 E �'��r OG yC jN.� V O grj���3_L yC Nq O d qUd =Lgp.'n ✓ 0� c1 -fib CC)-'Dy U` F_ Nq qN SC7 ' O C V 9 GC _��d q- E wSgOOU'r0 Oj2' n0 JOC 6� V6� rq u G N E N E O_^ L G o - Cq . .r q V�d .OirC 0= O 6�QV OE` p^ ELOO¢ gL „ On ' V 6r V« dCr✓ -J PY Or Lr. Iir=Nit LGgV? j C « 4 r x N - > n _ Qj r ni 4L yOr rJC ePC e GVr Y•". q.-' 9 b9 „ Od N 'L > C F �CLD� E>. t C NP 4 ` nLLn � L p y0 S� 9CrerpQ p= r� `�L tp'Vq r^ qr jy0 '.ry ✓9 Nd Oq V= � L��� TC O - Cr-SVEt Oj�^-_N-r �L�L ���✓ N' �N� [+y. N� > 9 `�,drN e� roc N c„ a 'Y' . -_.✓ c � L.L' o P� L=` P O N J r d W d N - W ✓ V V� .F O N � y D O ✓ e I i^ d j C !: C P V Q g y V C y r J V � ✓ G - C' � M p C e 9 ^ V 6�V' Gam` u GZ✓4cLLc �r OC >u E VOp V4 pN ^ I Oµ✓ F ^ V-- � ON✓ -V.VL9� O« O ✓ O O N� ^ V _- d •o N pC0 .J Vy > - L'JOs✓DN^� -_ LI --Eq NIN 0 _ °'r .c � p .i=�. ecq-_ .o✓'' _..ter r a oc e J Z b n Y O o�L � _ O O V O Z V b r 4 _ q y✓q O r � L N q L e O r G n�. 2 V p �- ✓ N S�. i �j^^ V � � P 6 1 C .Oi. � -� 1i F d L O•O q G C r r- C C c q L Y L a c- V_ CC V O N O Y O i V N.b. C• ne7 O� Ey Vo- ` nL- 6 c" 9 dc .J -. L cd " L •^ a .e.. � q r i � Pj r � ^� N.L.rq EeLC Nl T-JO � O > N ^G dNO N C 6 F 7 n C `< � r e c � c 0 q O E - .tir •_ 9 C C d 26 r „y-_^ GL r � _^-J � d q p y O - C V L e `j C O-J- �L•= - U Y S O N N_ p y P > WVr . CGaC C �r.Ni JCL •�-- j i = PO.Cy C _ - Y�`--, V ?L` Lc E L� � m �^c ❑ t. �_c= - - -__ O - � ✓.J >r V d G_9 G C N L L= N 6' P O V q- L.' �j •J l L C l P�j D C n i t - N✓ y-_ C V`9 q G ' W p�.L..c 4dv 9ybocD^c.r c=` _ Lda -f� P� YyP~•- c YC L� ` O OOy m�m� v� � n' L a.- as.L.• > c� cyc > M- n L a � ,a Y>b e � `Lrr- _ V p �_ W « Y O O.b q a d V�_ 1J✓ b✓✓ fj' - r L U E n 6V Jyp nd P- NCq C<y6V 6.- C r r e quo I oa'L 2 a d .o.tc L ,'•. c b= q; q ��c s ` u q' '^u q c �' c p r Na 7ru d-- 6' 'C i b V CI C q G• C 9 ^ b Q a .J qOC_ OlV �Pn 'e u O � � 9 V i .r... T N� . �• 0'= n V i q a''yf V `� �L a2 T q 4. Y 'n �V `Ti `GC V ld9G aP"'. gT Off. Gy ocd..;. C C r C V C J N j 2 CC E_ 4� iLT OC l r Ll Pq q �' AGO N06J O— G V q > 6 C .r r G �.� M.r l l N _•.r 4J G a m l9 nL n L O VL CO dY0 � vr qPr ^ J rco (q O6 � V �GV Ana V� q 2 JiE•� _ P p N m C POO• W,J _c q i i.a= G O Er oY EEPu V na �N G Gn u v QW C bGYll-_YNG �r G rP�� ii V V T r b y C q r O o P � L a• q yE l0 OY_4 n 6 > P i r C O Y O'9 N P LnGV a__ OOC)q CYO P` � V CV^ �� iC QZ C_— q � ^rV n 9 na`a _C5PgO j? y O OCVC 66 C r� CIJ ldC ^ i� LPG CE p 44 MV-" � Crj V .bi� pOiP� OW Frq V LOOCC E� d L9 gO0aUOa-�Nq r NCP V � GVV09 GJ 7 q .. d L P N C•. C r 0 0 r-U � �� • N C O C� O — Y yy O 4 v C O aNi G q p ^ ON rq gbv aP V rV^ V >p 1� Vn NrN L 6 r V q doC y .. bt vs eo v c N c o "q��ETL.s nod n -c.. oic.. Wi..•'..Nv :+vi as qr b ��,n Y ngrr UOQ q .. N aq` v G.a � Mnq 1' .iyO •r .a M q�p^ ^ 5:5 � �� P•. U V �1 N O It O C a YEN C Pii _V u—rVr � •i V ^ i MN O Yr y p r b r O .5 q G P— -VO L LdL - � dC Od LP P d_ Pd T�' LC CVd ^ uPq o � d• 4v rNW ov o e v V n c 9 L T O L C n C V u d � n N ✓-J _ p -J V V V O a O � 1. V 1-J' N Cl v ` C L J O M V S✓ - 7 > n •? `r L - C P^J � O d- � Q e O A Lt N V S_� C�J V P O� d 9 SD •n ' c✓e r'� L .N aS � ` P �' q D v u q L a4 v a C S L d 0 d 0 � ✓✓�—r E✓ q GC j C) Q Ov NF OV '^ CwPTN 6d n✓_ ��=vim cc any E ✓� d ✓✓ r -- ca L a9�a Po.� E ... 9 O e J . 6 OE .T+veego C `nr O L. n m Cyr V V L C ^= L L L O a O CO G✓ V r ' �ia -ci O 3_1 - a L ` _P C r V 6 _ ^ q =r dlJ� aL�✓L 6 N _C O. VJ6� ^ 9^ a ✓mac p✓'? C ^ rP L` Cr 3 aVPVD� N� NVN L y9 y CCn -Q r a= �C � � O Y..OLV C.'j •1✓ q_ QD✓ E O N V��L N _ � C� a T N q d C G V N— � `^ =p 6� N_'G ' S . N EpO 9S PF O� !-Jti �✓V V 7r Pn � O— ,n V O 9 r T V q NI d P �`N P� O 'J O m V O G P`✓'� V L-j .OS O LNV C d rI 'DLO ✓� O N6G 1C q� V ^ „N V� V y SD 6 J 6D lr N y^ O N NVC�'( 6 Y.O W 9 W V V 7 6 lJ'J n 2 6✓ 6 P V 6 V W O G � Y 40 _\ cg OOJ Zr ur a o q= -L v � c+f N usrr -o-emu ' V` �� S = � E 9 � y I v✓ C Z ✓C M a J N > q c .e. I✓ ` .`r�aui ono ✓ dd ` N = P =Q✓N qN =�`O ` .0.. i rv=E^ �`9w 9 � a9 aLr �y ` N dD 0 ¢ O V I7 C N 4 ^ Cc� _71 V EC yy ^N 9E7 6.O.r` V G_ QAAc a I GOr � •GE Co 2 V✓r 6r � di6 ✓ C CI Iry ^ C O �m .Ln > ` O G N am✓ n N � T T C C' x O g C� ✓E d C C L u � d y J N NI C O O Tl` T O 4 T= y V V 2 T ` V V CN O 7 g L ✓ C a ^ Sys W� CF= � Ld qG O•aV r ttfl VO Cyr CI a r 00 Pi P6> L C- O 6dS y P =l L, 1E1 W W E I b a r l� 9 6 0.✓ 6 I ( "3 L W N n i O W V W _ C _I b a - ; Q N J� C L V V ff V L U V 9 is b Q •• G � � Q h G d D �.. I I 1 � C9 r.�. qV i dY� d • I O `y t G `J • �^�Ly'� N V Z E Q f" rS]: D uE Pa vT � aLo v °� J l I .L. Y <' a rd Y �L• I ccuEv !�� `•' PC u` iNc' a� Q Ci6 I� I I I c ��11 J a J•^ _u O G O i L E > T p� I x I Jw vOi q ^J a r J q Y W V y L a N O ^ �'. _ • 1 `' T J� � 1{ y O V O • �yQ w T C r N V V N q ` O P N V J Y O O g v V y d Tf q6 bf bJa 9^ .N`qE CN Y� OJL_J CO IN 7'rJ' I_ Ix ` \ C B-z qN ^rL ` Y NPr t� CN NJ VL'1 O 1 L _ Lo aq` OE ea N• � Z 1 V P G_ 0 � V NI z �z Y � C Y N i Y O if q V V J t C `N upp J 0=b 'S P C I q d e V T C N C V E •' +: E A N Y b 6 L P G V bq d 4 L C •Y,. �. d D n= rd� Va LgOd li w L N �q •"' V a y. P 3 L Y TE ONb T��l� q. •nSG C� � O C 4� O' Jr ^ Y` NVNV d0 4.0�wC - qC_ O cc cc � P� r CLr P C q= I c 0 W O J L d y L P E q Y`d ti d D V >J Q O C q i V w G� J O N q w C O r C q F O„N 9 y Y W O O O J T S••✓` L L: a• a.� o' ".� �N ON LbL L G;E vdO a-A dY c e<e Y q Sx- N O J! cO.i.. �OCOq ,GCV G y '..Z. `^� Eq d I O'• Y N .mow J � ^o q= Yea q•,D+]T " � Do'G _ q-' c �I :^ - � 0 � od `- r E JL LCY0 o� Lw I � J e w Q V d w SI Y! =q > r m.7 D L O V V V N (q q C q • • Y 00 GW D Y O V O �� • i _ s W J y\^ V G v O = 1 q C N D r O ` � x 9 � � D S S •n Q p C � O d✓ u V L N ✓ V 1� N P' u (� HC ` N �n 'c' fC VO � ^ •OV j� 9 I V ^ � dY n y W d N�'J ` 'T q ✓ • O g y 0 ^ 1 O .V. G �� a •O =.r. �: „j a� u � c✓a = •� � _� N_ 4 O1 `�V O m V t q 6 U t N V � • « �^J. O' \\\' T� O i O. ✓i C ^ O•U L 9 A 9 r O ` L L I l y'e _ OI u—� d do c L.s�• E iw �d IUyu ^ VV ✓ a_e = Lq V V n of ^� Z 01 �> q L mo `o ` d s• Apr �1 '^ d —c 2 9q V L O f. ` c i non qdE q '� � d d N u O Tu 77_^ val1f ry � •...L. < nN 6 I O ZInr « N 0 p d V V F d y L V d V OOV Qi +• Ou y A ` Oa A� •. r ( 0 _O^ c 'J � na O V C G'✓t r0 LO o'a" poc "d Ire 3 o n 0.' aN i F. y O t .Nn O y Ib i y n' '^ O O V y✓ M O 6Mi T N VCO V` Ga py q " O f.q_aVN P _ Lq ✓ ^ NN nd L✓ C dV � C l � y0 C a Cr `C n^V yC ' V•'. Vu r _ = V— Vq _ l✓ GN L ` CC vr.— gTCV FLq Vr �r LC`` O V ru E ` —✓ � _' odor q�.o p V9 �sygc� =o`< cquLc cL � cc c v _'.N. ceA d a Nu -c V bbb V C _ •y _ � _ ..� _ ` Y � O �_ II== 9r __ C qqY OSr�T •� C`. N« ` IN� VC n Y c O p¢ V n V ^em u n� O 9 F i n c O n c`-� i✓ G�� D_ u O q T� ` e Gam•� n q ^ u �6 Opp V ,`y >L'C � C' L ` � q N V L 'V �^ C' 1= q0U EaN40 jTl N^� C EOM 9�u d� � � V✓ U.O+ �= uS SL •L•,cro men �oi� ✓emu r�r `W c^ _r✓ °L'vW T✓ r _ _ c Y N d o � _ � �—j �="+ e fin^ .°s.— nD ��� oN1D " .�. i✓„ — : nvT. ^v ce C.2 L r O,r L G + 'C C y u l l V O f i 1 I 0 Z V C G O V FF O 1 W A O d A � A • �a C ! a 9 �• y V. Y .. � a r d ✓ �� ` G r � p V n r � p N C C _ u a Lei 9 dJ d_ CSC b T � Q 11 'J \ Leo `mod -Z <' K - 1 to RESOLUTION N0. 83-132 A A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING THE AMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT 14AP NO. 11915-2 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 11915-2, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Crowell Industries, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, state r,f California, described as the development of 150 dwellings on 10.69 acf Ec of land it, the "ii" District, located at t�'.e S•^-utheast Corder of Arrow Route and Turner Avenue into 3 rots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and actifr on February 8, 1984; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommence approval of the Map subject to all conditions set. forth iu the Engineerinn and Piann=ng Division's reports; and WHEREAS, said map was conditionally approved by Resolution 83-132 on October 26, 1983, said cenditio,is remain unchanged and in effect; and WHEREAS, the Plaruinc Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Clvision's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public rearing. ® NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission approves the modifications to Tentative Tract No. i19161-2 based on the following findings: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract ib +;ot likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. Page 2 (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: The Planning Commission approves the modification to Tentative Tract Map No. 11915 and finds that all conditions contained in Resolution 83-132 for the tentative approval shall remain in full force and effect. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1964. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Ric Gomez, Deputy ecrer-ary 1, Pick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of February, 1984, by the following vote-to-wit. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: t1y - CITY OF RANCHO CliCA1 ONGA G�,entiro STAFF REPORT 0� { y � `a z DATE: February 8, 1984 - - 1977 �) TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall , Engineering Technician SUBJECT: ENVIR0f7MENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8345 - SERO AMUSEMENT COMPANY - A vision of acres into parce s in t e medium high residential district and office/professional district located on the northwest corner of Haven Avenue and Arrow Route - APN 208-341-01-04 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of Parcel Map. B. Purpose: To divide 40.35 acres of land into 2 parcels, dividing the medium high (MH) residential district from the office/professional district. C. Location: The northwest corner of Haven Avenue and Arrow Route. D. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 - 10.3 acres Parcel 2 - 27.6 acres E. Existing Zoning: Parcel 1 - office/professional district Parcel 2 - medium high residential district F. Existinq Land Use: Vineyaro G. Surroundin Lard Use: Nort. - vacant South - unused golf course East - K-Mart Store West - existing industrial building H. Sijrr0undin General Plan Development Code Designations: North - office/professional 0��istrict/m. residential South - industrial Nark, subarea 6 East - industrial nark subarea 6 West - medium high (MH� district I —! t $ ITEM K Page 2 I. Site Characteristics: Project is a vineyard at the present time. This site slopes southerly at about 1.5%. II. ANALYSIS: This parcel map dividing 40.35 acres of land into 2 parcels separates the office professional district from the medium high residential per DevElopment District Map. Since plans for development are incomplete, an offer to dedicate Civic Center Drive across both narcejs is required, it is expected that development plans will be completed enough at the time of recordation to determine the westerly limit of dedication for Civic Center Drive. A proposed requirement to obtain access restrictions on Haven Avenue and Arrow Route is intended to provide for the minimum number of driveways on each street consistent with access needs. Provision will be made for the utlimate major access to the property to the west to be opposite Center Ave. This may involve a small irregular dedication or easement, which should be considered when a development project is submitted for approval. Street improvements will be constructed at time of development of the parcels. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Also attached for your review and consideration s Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Upon completion and review of the Initial Study and field investigation, Staff found no adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the proposed subdivision. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input and elements of the project. If, after such consideration, the Commission can support the recommended conditions of approval as written in the City Engineer's Report, then adoption of the attached resolution would be appropriate. It is also recommended that a Negative Declaration be issued. Respectfully submitted, i LBH:BK:jaa Attachments: Map - Tentative & Vicinity s. Resolution City Engineer's Report Initial Study �C j AlCUBL MA f% V: 5j4b si¢c n era Nate$ IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �wruaT 591TI c: BEING A DIVISION OF LOTS 10 AND 14. SECTION If. TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH. ►h ITIA. no-see RANGE 7 WEST. AQ'(MING TO YAP Of CUCAMONGA LANOS. AS PER PLAT RECOROEO IN lOOK 4OF MANS. PAGE S. RECORDS OF SAN I W£RNARDINO COUNTS, CAL.FORNIA. l / 1 SCALE 11•Lf10 ,�.:c- ]]•, ..0 car• 1 v.... : 1 a � _ c.v•ar .caeca✓<>wc I .[ Mx V ene i .. ......G.� Y. T • I i _ I PARCEL )ro PARCEL 1 N _ _ u i - r c.ca<e �•r .aa �_c<s�Il 1 r 9 p _ 13 rz ILI '' ' <..e•COT M'i- _ e xaa....a a� -I. _ I �9:.G .�G I •Y- O..u••.�-O-JCL.IIJ(J•�or -n �'I I , 1 .._. . o.-e- .ou.<..o_a cr.•.< e. .-1.� III �— y L ROU iE— ._. I in .],. {���f ::a-e. P•EET :, au�l: .5.o�+d�r re I ' O w![R HMO R►►I�CRNT :=:.v o'.N=p-- 1' 4� N.:S4S xro^/r.-•^..x .:u t Joro+.Co•u w� ^< 'I i'i. ' IZJL UTCL••I CS Gc» moo...-.]- 6'or.•-o G..]� Ca - - 2 S d. s[RcR NARK 1' t. D G II Broer� �oJ •.. oCC t-b�Q v./w co..•a/ �oo/�•rJ Gr.v C ++o..<r+ nw. VI INITT NY q Y L ----------- v�® � O �T L ram'I_;' i ' III 1 - t ,-�'•1 ' i Ll - L �ITTI'I T-T I_LLj _'LL; 9 ! _ I I �.^ CIT4" OF RANCHO CUC:VM0, CA D.M. 8345 zNGINEERTNG DIVISION VICINITY MAP �T -- 197' 1 P2gL FC 7-1 Q FC El ❑ . � � • ,,", . B9 (fit. n s i GC_L bIIL —� -------- i np Future City . 00 Hall ME i ; Fc ® ; P. M. 13 a � Gc • Iowa13 -- GC ``f CITE' OF RA1C'.-tO CUCAMO\GA title, _ P.M. 8345 } sF EtiC;ItiEEFti\G DIVISION T tZ VICINITY MAP 197 —1 � -f 1 P29 c CITY OF 'UCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORxLATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Envi ro-nmenta.' Assessment Review Fee: $87. Oo For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be complete.-i and s"bmitted to the Develop tent Review Cort~.ittee through the department where :' 2 project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff wi11 prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committ_C will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days biefore the public meeting at which time the Project is to be heard. The Cora_ittee will make one c ' three determinations : 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental ispoct and a Negative Declarations Will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Repo t will be prepared, or 3) An acditional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tics_ concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Tentative Parse; Map No. 8345 APPLICANT'S NAME. ADDRESS, TELF.P C E'_�� °�' !� G ✓ter ^� / c fnt_ NAME, ADDRZ _," TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCE2VINS T3IS PROJECT: �RN/'Lr7 /fit '7�» LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. ) Nor-:^.vest corner of Haven Ave. & Arrow Rte— . s� lessors LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LCCAI, Z GIONAL. STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENC'_' ISSUING SUC Sap Bernardino County Dust Control PFR•?ITS I-1 Q 1 a PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: ; t is proposed cc :onsolida:e the existing tour oar:eis of .an & red',71 e into _wo. ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING ANL PROPOSED BUILDINGS , IF ANY: 40.55 acres, gross DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFOR.NIATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTURi.L, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE O_' SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES: AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS) : Project Bice is a vineyard at present time. true :ng tinn is icca[ed co the west another vin �y ,rd is on the north, -Mart is on cpe opposite side of !Haven Ave. co the East and La Mancha Golf Course knot in use is to the south. here are no cuicura. , istori:ai or scenic aspects. Is the Dro]ect part of a larger pro?ect, one of a series Of cumulative actions , which aft:01Ci1 indi-.iduall_I small., may as a whole have sicnificant -nvironmental impact? 1-2 `la � � I�II Jill III WILL THIS PROJECT: qP I! YES NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground i contours? 2. Create a 1�ubstartial change in existing noise or vibration? 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water. , sew age, otr, 1 ? 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? 5. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as boxic substances, fla=nables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above : g- I2A-PORT2NT: If the project involves :he construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibit-, p_esent the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements , and information presented are true and corrEct to the best of my knowledge and relief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the De•.re;opment Review Committee. Data_ i Lq 1-l" Signature _T Title ±'r?►L� _ I-3 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING .O:iMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PPPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 8345 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 8345) LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 8345, submitted by Sero Amusement Company and consisting of 2 parcels, located on the northwest corner of Haven Avenue and Arrow Route, being = division of Lots 15 and 16, Section 11, T1S, R7W, according to Map of Cucamonga Lands as per plat recorded in door 4 of Maps, Page 9, Records of San Bernardino, California; and WHEREAS, on January 3, 1984, a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above-described Tentative Map; and WHEREAS, on February 8, 1984, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above-described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLCWS: SECTICN 1: That the following findings have been made: ® 1. That the rap is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with she General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision andimprovements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse environmental impacts and a Negative Declaration is issued on February 8, 1994. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 8345 is approved subject to the recommendetl Conditions of Approval pertaining thereto. APPROJED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF FZBRUARY, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman e t R; ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deou ty Secretar of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucarnon9a, at a regular meeting of the Planning CommisSion held on the 8th day of February, 1984, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COitiMT:STONERS: ABSENT: C&MMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL LOCATION: Northwest corner of :iaven Avenue TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO: 8345 and Arrow Route DATE FILED: 1/3/S4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A division of Lots 15 NUMBER OF LOTS: 2 and 16 Section 11 T1S R7W according to GROSS ACREAGE: 40.35 .1 Of Ii-a-----HIUII�JO Lnnd5, a- --r plat record- ACSESSQR PARCEL N0:208-341-01 ,04 ed in Book of Maps, ?age , Records of -an Bernardino Co. DEVELOPER OWNER ENGINEER/SURVEYOR Sero Amusement Co, same Associated Enqineers and Jafam Corp. 520 Y. Euclid Avenue 316 East "E" Street Ontario, CA 91761 Ontario, CA 91762 _ Improvement and dedicativn requirements in accordance with Title 16 of the Municipal Code ;f the City of Rancho Cucamonga include, but may not be limited to, the following: Dedications and Vehicular Access A 1 . Offer of Dedication shall be made on the north side of the property for 1/2 width of Civic Center Drive. Offer must line up with :xisting centerline of Civic Center Drive. x 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the followinc streets: 50 additional feet on Arrow Route additional feet on additional feet on x 3. Corner property line radius .gill be required per City Standards. 24, radius at Arrow and Haven x 4. All rights of vehicular ingr;ss and egress shall be dedicated on Haven and Arrow per Planning Commission Resoiution yo. 73- 29. 5. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all common roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by C.C.&R.s and shall be recorded concurrent with the map. -1- 1 11 NINE 1, it X 6. All existing easements lying g within future right-of-wayr o be - -or delineated quitclaimed neate.. on the ma per City P P Engineer's requirements. I X 7. Easements foi sidewalk for public use shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. Sret 1. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorneys ,.o��, ntes i.... l -_. ,.y p:et«,or, Of the public improvements prior to prior to building permit issuance for Parcel 1 end 2, _ X 2. A lien agreement must be executed prior to recording of the :nap for the following: for 1/2 medium island on Haven Avenue. X 3. Surety shall be posted and an agreement exetut_d, guaranteeing completion of all on-site drainage facilites nee-tsary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division prior to issuance of building permit for Parcel land 2. Street Improvements Pursuant to the City of Ranch Cucamonga Municipal C• de, Title 16, Section 16.?6.120, the subdivider may enter into ar agreement and post security with the City guaranteeing the required construction prior to recordation of the map and/or building permit issuance. 1. Construct full street imp-ovements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive app,-oaches, Parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. 2. A minimur„ of 26-foot wide pavement within a 40-foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be constructed for all half- section streets. X 3. Construct the following missing improvements: Prior to building permit issuance for Parcel 1 and 2 Cur A.C. j Side-IDrive -treet Street I A- . Poe ian I Stree`. Name Gutted PVML. 1 Walk JAppr. Trees ) Lights loverlaY island* Others FaVer— X X X X X , X lien Arrow X X X X I X X i Civic Centerl X X X X X X *Iecludes landscaping and irrigation or meter -2- 01 - AA ME X _ 4. Prior to any worn beiig performed in the public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City 'engineer's Office, in add`tion to any other permits required. X 5. Street improvement plans shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City r"_r1gineer prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. X 6. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power ;poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. } X 7. Existing lines of 12KV or less fronting the property shall be undergrounded. X 8. Install appropriate street name signs , traffic control signs, striping and markings with locations and types approved by the City Engineer. X 9. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company znd the Cit• of Rancho Cucamonga. Lights shall be on decorative poles with underground service. X 10_ Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permit. 11. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cress sidewalks. Urdersidewalk drains shall be installed t0 City Standards. Drainage and Fiond Control 1. Private drainage Oasements for cross-lot drainage shall be required and shail be delineates or noticed on the final map. X 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal a of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. t 3. The foilowiny storm drain shall be installed to the satisfaction of the pity Engineer 4. Prior to recordation of the mac, a hydrologic and drainage study for the project shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review. S. A drainage . detention basin per City Standard., shall be constructer o detain increased runoff -3- 1 a GradSr. X 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading plan. X 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work prior to issuance of building permit. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer i,Gr geologist z6d SUWM,iitte a e of app i iCdtiGn or grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Grading Committee and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuanc:: Of building permit whichever comes first. 5. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the B-ilding and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of building permit. General Requirements and Approvals X 1- Permits from other agencies will be required _- follows: CalTrans for San Bernardino County Flood Control District X Cucamonga County Water District for sewer and water X San Bernardino County Dust Abatement (required prior to issuance of a grading permit) Other 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (C.C.&R.$) approved by the City Attorney is required prior to recordation of the map. X 3. Provide all ut':lity services to each lot including sewerage, water, electric power, gas and telephone prior to street constructor. x 4. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A l,atter of acceptance is required. X 5. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CalTrans/San Bernardino County Flood Control Uistrict. x 6. Approvals have not been s^-�ured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. -4- ] a O X 7. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County water District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. 8. Local and Master Planned Trails shall be provided in accordance with the Trail Plan. A detailed trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing and weed control, in accordance with City trail standards, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to recordation for and/or prior to building permit is name -or 9, Prior to recording, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District 82-1 among the newly created parcels. X 10. At the time of final map submittal, the following shall be submitted: Title Report, traverse calculations (sheets), copies recorded maps and deeds used as reference and/or showing original lard division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. CITY OF RA%CHO CUCAMONGA LLOYD B. HUBBS, CITY ENGINEER by: ��- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r -ACANi0- STAFF REPORT II^ �s DATE: February 8, 1984 19` TO: Chairman and trembers of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRO`!MENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 83-42 - GALVIS - The conversion of an existing gas service station f into a self-service station and mini-market in the General Commercial District, located at 8166 Foothill Boulevard - APN 207-112-17. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requeste- :_ Approval of site plan and elevations. B. Purpose: Conversion of a service station into a self-service station and mini-market. + C. Location: Northeast corner of Foothill and Red Hill Country Cluj Drive. D. Parcel Size: One acre t E. Existinq Zoning: General Commercial i F. Existinq Lana Use: Service Station I G. Surroundirq Land Use and ZonireL North - Golf Course Low Residential South - Commercial ; General Commercial East - Commercial ; Genera; Commercial West - Commercial ; General Co,nc erci al H. General Pian Designations: . roject :te - General Commercial North - Golf Course South - General Commercial East - General Comm erciai West - General Commercial 1 I. Site Characteristics: The site has been fully developed, except for street lights and landscaping, as a automobile service station as shown on the site photographs on Exhibit 3 e — ITEM L i PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT OR 83-42/Galvis February 8, 1984 Page 2 i J. Applicable Regulations: The Development Code permits automotive service stations, food stores, and general retail stores within the General Commercial District. The Sign Ordinance requires that no new signs or building projects shall be approved for a site or structure unless all non-conforming signs are removed or modified to conform with the provisions of E the Sign Ordinance. j II. ANPUSIS: A. General : This project has been designed wherever possible in accordance with the Development Code regulations. However, because of the unusual triangular shape, limited size, and existing structures, the project cannot meet th,: landscape setback requirements for Foothill Boulevard and izc� } Hill Country Club Drive. However-, the Code does allow less when t;ie required landscaping depth is greater than twenty percent of the nrtnerty depth. The applicant propos=s to convert the exsting service bay_ and office into a new sales { area for a mini-market as shown on Exhibit "B". Foc. existing driveways, two eaci? on Foothill and 'ed Hill Avenue, provwe access to the property. To comply W;th the City's access control policies for Foothill Boulevard, the Engineering Division recommends closure of the west driveway on Foothill 3oulevard. This will improve traffic circulation and safety by directing traffic to the Red Hill Avenue intersection that is controlled with a stop sign- B. Design Review Committee: The Committee has worked with the applicant to re�,o ve concerns relative to the site plan layout; specifically, circulatioi and new landscaping. The Committee supports t;:e Engineering Division recommendation to eliminate the west drive approach or. Foothill Boulevard. The applicant 1 has agreed to remove existing asphclt areas and replace tnea with landscape planters as shown on the site plan (Exhibit "B") . In addit'cn, the Committee recommended the removal of all existing non-conforming signs including the large free-standing sign located on the east property line as shown on Exhibit "D". C. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been comp etea by the app icant. Staff has completed the Environmental Assessment and found no significant adverse impacts will occur as a result of this project. - 131 - i PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT OR 83-42/Galvin February 8, 1984 Page 3 IiI. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is Consistent with the Development Code and the Genera: Plan. The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant environmental impacts. In addition the nreposed use, site plan, and e'.evations, together with the recommended conditions of approval, are in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Development Code and City standards. IV. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission cones J material and elements of this project. If after such consideration the Commission can support the facts for finding and conditions of approval , adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Respectfully s)abmitted, Rick Gomez rity Planner RG:DC:jr ;Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Elevations Exhibit "D" - Site Photographs Initial Study, Part I Resolution of Approval with Conditions it C QRQS G-s Ali LLJ OL I= 11 1 \OUH CITY OF ITEM= R��, CUGC" IO-'GA TITLE: - � �����y�,��PLAINN"I\G DIVISION EXIiIBIT=� scALE- �}--1—=a i,,,-�- Ml"AVM 4(M/SAV�Z( Ci.Jf OM1n�� sever FLGTNILL C:YP n-rir..r � NORTH CITY OF ITEM: • z RANCHO CUCNXIONGIA TITLE: !r2crs PLANNING DID OONT EXI ilBD-. SC-ALE- I — I A.T lal/�Wl H H I J_J_t ^�ri?'lOG•'t� 11 i I i I W TA•+n•yr.. •J�-'�••'fKGJ 4vV M / HM:L 1�-/�• /.r v�waaC.tpQ is V NORM CITE' OF iTE�t: _ r, RANCHO CL;C-k lO.GA TITLE: PL MNNTI\G D[Xrb-nN EXHIMT. SALE: "^"'� i, 1 - 7ts!Z4i� rl a 01. f .. t t�1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87. 00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this f0T111 mmast t co'mpict2d triad ai: iaTiittcu to t1i2 D2vcivYffcnt Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. 9 PROJECT TITLE: AP_ i_ICANTc S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE:�i--� / L ^ /ter !_41 Q. i. NAME. ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: e�eri/ /f �r�. ✓- i)i- �.�sf kc� e� LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.)- / .l ��(r-Z 7 LIST OTHERPERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: Ap I-1 -� 37 - I PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Al-1 /iii4- ACREAGE OF PROJECT A: EA AND S.'.JARE : OF EXISTING ANDPROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF AtvY DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PL?14TS (TR£E:i) , ANIMALS, KqY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS) : f r •� Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, �h� c'i although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? �L 1-2 WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? u 2. Create a substantial change in existing t' noise or vibration? 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. ) ? K4. Create changes in the existing zoning or gerieral plan. designations? V 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? o. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Review Comr.:ittee. Date /i Title - t3q- I-3 ti RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUC;LMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 83-42 LOCATED AT 8166 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 6th day of January, 1984, a complete application was filed by Rodrigo and Elizabeth Galvis for review of the above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 8th day of February, 1964, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above-described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed; and 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and 4. That the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a -negative Deciaration is issued on February 8, 1984 SECTION 3: That "velopment Review No. 83-42 is approved subject to the following conditions and attached Standard Conditions: 1. Remove and replace existing asphalt areas with landscape planters per the approved site plans. Landscaping shall include mounding, trees and shrubs to screen parking areas, and ground cover. 2. The final sidewalk design and placement on Foothill Boulevard shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Engineering Divisions prior to installation. Resolution No. Page 2 3. All non-conforming signs shall be removed or altered to conform to the requirements of the Sign Ordinance, including the large free-standing sign located on the east property line. A performance agreement secured with a bond shall be prepared prior to issuance of building permits tc ensure sign removal prior to occupancy. 4. The west drive approach on Foothill Boulevard shall be removed and replaced with curb and gutter. A permit from Caltrans is required, proof of such shall be submitted prior to building permit issuance. 5. The applicant shall Contact the Foothill Firp Prntortinn District to satisfy District requirements for access and fire hydrants prior to issuance of building permits. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY• Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 2th day of February, 1984, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: oem Nam P— vP yo" �<c = = aG =L GjP C Z V C rJ O O r V O + C > y C Ei ro iy—_ �_ - do N - — Na• — Q✓ r .. .f V i N G J N = n G n_ V � •�_ U O � 2 q j •c oQ o L o= c ---c c+ v✓ N —o < -✓"Ln„ - No �y _ <� .. O _N d C w �n d_ - O V y ,�.C'n� - •T O d O L q y P�• r CC y C✓ � n V t .n A N u C' Q w• .Li• M^ 6 C u M T V VaPO CC TN ONN dd� 0 ✓ L 000 CrV yj� _• ✓i• �nf- 7G � PO� Gd0 NL � C 9y - � u L_✓ - J ` 4` ` rTJ =�J- rGOE Tmr � TNE ^J�GIu '<Cw yd� CV �r � c" �` it' s cr >✓ o� G d vi c-o ._ _ .2.. � d c=_ L N o 'c ✓ c roro.o Trl u0 cs. v do y yVy 4pC.V < NLiJ G4rm 6A r� pM �m0 L mO O ^ c u� } _ L2C a Y a U V C c p 1 Ny C.UY C � C' G� LC VC NVC O i ' I 0. G� G_ O d �C � C.G U✓ G T C V G 14 2 C 9 C y f C _ C G V _ , Y. • �I G6 Jn VEVt V6d �LyG � �' C n Q N y G SC CI Cyr m L � C Q ^ y�� VP✓ •4L � ,➢ Fn= IL � fr-✓aL- •� '�•C. TC C Mq - � -J J V q q - r f t G L✓ _ n l G. ✓._r .n CO V r- T.✓ �' L J 6 l � � 1. � C r C� ` I r C {_ � r O�L` O c-`J a 'V' � a VCniS 9CSa 0= L'.i. Ni f. r �CV G GGVCV= = n ^ Ui CG /�••F G V•Vi i •• aG`' q C C •' l `� •' E � oc" Er,v oL� Ur =-- : �y •-d-„ - ^tea `- n- � - l/ G o •.r ti � -y p � - - c, :',.-r• ui'= mN e.i.� on , - � r -•. _- r' q_ - u =r e i, g G d E u c V �D C •~✓ a a'� :n c , - _ N c .:r - i,� _p.V ' L3] d pr:L V COC a a a Uc G P✓= _ GL ` ti = c¢ .'i� cr a .riu c� � `"✓ o io =� .gib--.. p ✓ a n L r T 't= C I F �= V a= = C G u C r- N Q C y+C C G = rP^v.�$ ` �, ' I c` E u ar V r O v q •_ _ >a r r _•r •` - Z a. G a c co c __D �.:.T.' _ r o .•. - H c•L. v co ^ are ". c c - --N•�'s-a c 'aa ` � „._ Ca LL C •"'S y <O✓ O ^ i_� ^AGO pG`nC yC� � - - ✓ NCM C ✓--rn O p0 C_ G, T ` rTV O'PVq ` qC ' ' �4 •T•r� NVVga � P OrgO C � �� V rrOy - F O V V V G O u V_ C C'a O V l F O C 6' N � V tC. O F 1. G a •r �n� P - _ � _ c qo 00 � r J� o�a `=•'r cc _ `uA � o ��i V.'<. . ctl ^' c G i. a,•� q- �'•', N my � •" c c n r q ^ O LOi . eL LDa i ^La iy0✓ N CNP �c _L Mo�� ��_¢vC �D-`r u .a'.- � ` c�✓onry:a 4a � C 1. j M i � V C 1_C M ae r l� V C .r•J �. O V L >,a •-u O V I T i = o o:a' c n`- 'Oq v` rG; V.G.�.r. c m cui� :� c-„ °_•' r _ - o - �_- v Go- aecct � -_ •:n - c� c - :cq i - u �. c c •' r - t �-�-v i.G. � oc J nN - q do r� _ �--c-.N.-+o oN,`r_e c;_ u" - e � _ -.ucc- o✓` ✓ o _ ` � v0• G C 4 6 r C O ' v OL L L r l� V O .. _D • �' � _ _ F.0 -L GC: Y. 6n 6+ ZNgN-•Or- O- V •a 6� iNLgi�. �._ Nl • 0 N Ji cLrn v o .a•�rc _ o - s a� J ✓r G✓ '^ i � o � � Fiuv a-_ rNc- F. ✓ J n a Un i T C 6 L< � i O O C✓ _ V rn G' FF o N o N r P = o O rJ - ci •N Ga` in. c c .+ - ..0 - L "e 'LC OC r _ rCJD O •. q Vw �' Sc q � V G^.� C rc L- c .• ~�'✓ cam u '^ na rc - n s _ D csLu - l] � C C_ - _ -L C 4 V -_O-• _ y_ O C C C 0 V N 72.2 N O N C' r V C✓ •.r a. G T F ••"� C " i °'�� '• s V GPL r� � vc moo^, o C.ar Ps _ � _� =• e Ts >.0 o ✓ � -- e - ^o c� c ec a- G r o =c = e u, e C e c V J� L c W C C_L„ C C q C• � C ^ C= - O ' C y n _ _ C Va _ C ✓ _ L C � Purr '•__ ar' S✓ P� a .-Cr✓ •C• r r _V = __ C i � S a `T G 9 C y_j C V �✓ V y >.r- C c a C ` C W nr C i t N v C a J • C V •C-.� N F r`E L T C ._ C a.^. T� a O Y - _ � r� C�� C C' PS �- u � � ni .-. �•� "`.. G�.W� ' vr'-Z ±7 Lei <! _ - cr +.n S.qq �:; _ � O .c r •y q r G/ - G T V C _ a T •I •_ J w P L r U (V JLr✓ >. n G_ g V V G' C .'] V r „�� ' �� � - L O- J �= ND N9q C 6d V� P� rr� rG la C<rCV m 55 ya G� W�� CL ' I Or •1 I �1 I I ul I I ! d _ _ CG P6, �I -- — ✓� ur I -' J L L 'o' d s� •O Grd � .� V .aT,-.�- Cry re G - _ C C � G > q O L - qO G-•' >. r2r C.>. vTi ' LL - 6CL ti .." _ ti _ �s C ` r •� C C - C -G c r, - yt CO c9� ^� CL 2uP qC P'^ N r q NfV 'o ¢= r YO _ -^JJCP C= cTj cU..LV..' _ WN wCi ¢RCN C�`� EOu T5 C � N gLNP r= n � C'AC 9r OCC yC G q� 06 CV �L� � WVr NN9 uniu q C V ¢Cgr " L C G l g ,^ C ¢Li p L ^ VOVCG .CjN ` r rv 'rN NO `J G, qJ 6 4 ¢ CFTGgh ah y VC p N � T L R• M C O•_ i u �. L N < cN, a .r,. c== �, c :� f q¢• ao t c"� o W c eZ L.• L V la Ij .� L .. q fC N u'` V L`� C '-� O �. � T n Cur � r G C i L G _ •-n V'N re p�i NNW ".a. c_ c M r-• c` `N i .>. � ,n c c c N o r a Q C< ON— .0 C Q n uNM` O ¢ jN� rgN CN.� CC Qh2� dW I < N O I rn or 0� cc qA �.G '_ ^M _ N� c_.- ^' a -N ...✓�. r,^ �= v c �- c c c 4~ 4 LLl l_L i0 N Vt � T. > n CJ „L I � CN VN � ' C ✓ � ✓ _ V. N V � T 'O ...� N= A C -N rr 6 A V O V✓ C n C'. C_�r L { d ✓ l d C >'O '�`C � Gu ` O G rnq C'uV _ VV > Gq Er 4 � 4V GP� l Q'y yiC ?=u ✓ V V C d r ' � � Ly v V d L N r d V J^ u V C On .L N a9 ... � QL ✓ O =VCVq= Cu n.O. Cr V, C a✓ C �`J L C � y'o 0.E V j LL d O r ='� n O` ^C - C•p Z _O _ ^> C'NW Cq (,� � GyC LVM ✓ � PF_ � LN � - L� �o in rt iuA o y, vu -3fn Vooi4✓ < av <i:+� o NI I I 51 til I •I y L NV � C �L q Of.G Cry •I L � ��C .' Uy J J G - I OC .-. ✓ O C` C c CL u N N eSi `= T -'W V C✓ T.P r P i T c V V J o' N c '✓ ' C�.L o I c=L W n^:�o L - '� C �YO. V uY' - � I cUL I• FgV I nq E � ✓N O � ::� �.. V �� „ I L� _r C. C ✓ � LO dfC � `�� W C. V rOVE N l �y V L u C •"' � < < �I F .Ti I ^ C+C O 'J O V - m I vd ".�.^ :•✓.� _ _ ° �-_:'—cam a `✓ c C �, F. c e __O V_LL T O C V `C = `` Z C _ I..:V v.N L C c l "� �• u C V 0 G � : C Vcl Clw LC nT� C u. d^N- l� G=emu d- G O u. i � C 9 G_9 J G• G � G V. C � .n p. ' � ' c L _ C`r d V c Gl E. ✓ Cr_ _ r_ _ ` �• 2_ _ r I V U v. mI I •I I � I r \I � r I �� I i c07 u C_ r .Fi•L rn O _ - C 2 O C,C LI C C � ' C�✓ V � � Gr O� _ F G _ _ _ _ _ C � 2 _ w c _ . - x C Jv^'J✓• c •e cC � or Ei WCL ^ GOB C _ G' us _ Ll O; G� (P I c I �I � G cis _ oo ' o' c I x� _ o " � u E 1 _-`L = I, •I ! ? - Gam_ --- J 'O ` 2 i r c •e y W C V • 9 � I q p C q _I x✓ G" c c N c 1 o yl Vr O I C=N Cq GL- •- C I `c Or i I : pW ST •ri• P � cG' r i Qc>o �✓v � u o � I I-v9 �= I � I Q c. _y ✓ c GI ✓ V_ C V C O J V V � - C^ U .y L V_ _ 1 �^.- C I ��� < 6N 6 ? � S O Nr S^ �r � 6✓ G y J <_ C1 .Vi 1 -I I I I il• \ pl ^I ql I I • I 1 I LI I O _ IC NOS ✓ � �_� �N_ ✓ 9 -J ` IJi cs_� -cam •" •^ iy. � cc .._ " _ �- N . `'_ x ^ ^ V r 'E C G I U C L A T N O ✓ C G 1 V• ^.y� N 4_ ILLL G•n O n p x .-. I r i 1 p _ £ q •.. G _ N _ lo.'c u✓ >. 'sue .'• o _ I- aicr G _ co - s. " �'_ qc -J Nnc z 1 _.O•r C u 6 2` C C G < < �. - G - O _ ` 'L'+•rig 2 L N V I IE ` C✓ ^ T � nV- 9�sv ` � Ern VAT Sp = _ G L � I P G V p _ L G C`� �V-• az r C c _ _ N G C'r O C V y Q C.^ •--e C r - C V V V � � i V� ✓�Y+ � C v C� � V V V-y T V ✓ Ip G^ T UG-- G ^ `-O^_ VI GJ G' C• _ NVEi xN Cc G q 4 � IE GpV ✓16ueC <�+� ✓+ O--+ O N+V n�-.. <V G u✓ N � �V SG V� • I � l w{ I 1 I �I «I 1 -lL4 7 - N v I 0 J �J L O U _ L O n q O U C C - O 6� Y P Wp 66 �� � i LJtJ C ^_ 1 l (J �.