The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1984/02/22 - Agenda Packet.. J !C .. I . 4 �V :�� iY e' '.a ;< j:,.r... 'P' .. ,r_` .Q .. ... ;`*�. � . . \_�'�.' e �21'. � .. i� �•� ��r y,4;. cj it .,� a� � :�u _ .1 � �• , �. lh _ Y�... .�,�: r.. _ _ ;:Y �: ':� .`:. (e.. L _^t � _ :� L'.� r .. '�\ .` f _ f'. . �.lP . l . J t 1 - -� •fir , 13�.�, '. . l �,.�. ., . . . . ....._a..^, .o. n g CrrY OF 4 JL-�i ,\V Co F� AGENDA z WEDNESDAY FEBRUARY 22, 1984 7:00 p.m. LIONS PARK COKNIUKITy CENnR 9161 BASE LME RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIBORWA Y C$edKe of N H- RoR Cam Commissioner Barker Commissioner Juarez — Commissioner Remepei Commissioner McNiel— Commissioner Stout HL Announcements lY. Consent Calendar The Consent Calendar items are and non-c nt-oversial. They will be acted on acted routine one time without discussiam If an b!' the Commission e ayto at it should be removed for discussion. e has kern over any item, A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82-18 - HOWARD - A revision to previously approved Conditional Use Permrt for First Assembly of God Church for the develcF,meni of a square foot building on 5.5 acres of land in the "VL" District, located on the northeast corner of Archibald and Wilson Avenues - APN 201-381-U1. B. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 11549 - LEWIS - A residential tract subdivision o 52 acres into 90 lois in the Very Low District located b tween Etiwanda and East Avenues, south of Summit Avenue - APN 225-181-02 through 04, 06 through 09, 26 and 43. V. Public Herrings 4' The following items are Public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related proiect. PIease wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the CommLvion by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8303 - C� TESON - A division of 13.1 acres into IS General Commercial parcels in tW district �(GC) located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue - APN 1077-401-01, 03. { t D. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83-07 - CHRISTESON - The development of Phase I of the Virginia Dare Winery Business Center, consisting of office, banking and restaurant uses comprising 2 buildings and a theme tower on 13.1 acres of land in the General Commercial district located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue - APN 1077-401-01 and 03. E. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83-17 - 84 LUMBER - A revision to a previously approved CUP for the development of a 31,200 sq. ft. building for 84 Lumber on 2.55 acres of land in the Industrial Park category (Subarea 6), located on the west side of Haven, south of 8th Street - APN 209-251-05. F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12523 - LiGHTNER - The development of 35 single family homes on 9.55 acres of land in the "L" District (2-4 du/ac), located on the north side of Lemon Avenue, 600 feet east of Archibald Avenue - APN 201-251-09. VL New Business G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 83-44 - SUPRACOTE - The construction of a 29,000 sq. ft. warehouse addition to the existing manufacturing plant on 16 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8) located at 11200 Arrow - APN 208-351-12. VIL Director's Reports H. DISCUSSION OF HOUSING ELEMENT TECHNICAL APPENDIX - Review and comment from the members of the Commission of the information contained in the Technical Appendix of the Housing Element for the 1984 update required by AB 2853. VIIL Public Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear orc this eVenda. IX. Ad;vurnmmt The ?canning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. u` f,; V VICINITY' MAP i • � •� i i i i A i mom • �� tOLLEOi � :.� I � • t Btl.li� �% Y Y • • • • • e fUC•S •.A. CITY YAL4 ! ; • • Y 00 Y • 11 f • Anaw • • O l a tu4rpwG•-6u•Sb t0uwtr .EGfOw • � / 0•TAllq f•f[••ATTw AL N•b•T CITY OF RANCHO CUGMOWA ie CITY OF RANCKO CUCAMONGA C;CAA4o4 STAFF REPORT _d V i IT F IZ DATE: February 22, 1984 1977, I TO: Chairman and Members of the Manning Commission I FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Curt Johnston, Associate Planner 1' SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82-18 - HOWARD - A revision to previously approved Con itionaT Use Permit for First Assembly of God Church for the development of a 91OG square foot building on 5.5 acres of land in the "VL" District, located on the northeast corner of Archibald and Wilson Avenues - APN 201-381-01. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant for this project, Assembly of God Church, is requesting approval of revised building elevations. The subject building is metal frame structure which ultimately will become the church's multi-purpose building. The previous design was approved by the Commission at the ® September 28, 1983 meeting on appeal of a Design Review Committee recommendation. The revised design proposes a larger roof structure and massive columns to create a covered walkway around the building. The exterior building materials are basically unchanged with a the roof, wood trim, bronze glass, and textured stucco. II. ANALYSIS: A. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee reviewed the design revisions on February 8, 15984 and recommended !I approval . The Committee stated that the changes are a definite improvement in the building design. i III. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input and elements of this project. If the Commission concurs with the Design Review Committee's recommendations, adoption of the attached Resolution would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, Rick Gomez City Planner RG:CJ:jr ITEM A ni -.-.00P Y.rc ant r--- -- — tj B f� usc NOR CITY OF ITE\i- �•n.P. az-o6 P01`S1NC1710 CLCALN'10:\\ A TITLE: PI;ANINTING DIVISON, EXHIBIT-. r .r Sc-ALE- -S• R- 3 52. COMMISSION1• CONDITIONALA• Page 2 �:� •i.. ExhibitLocation Exhibit "B" - Site Plan • 1 " - Previously Approved Elevations Original Resolution with Conditions _ Amended Resolution 0,1 ,f a r4.w f I -f IJI•l f '.L • 1 1 1 L s:�l 1. L f I f T11- h ti— 1 1— 1f�V-.. — ! I I � J �I II �, �� East Elevation -[F - •--cz _ :,a •"xi.,e '�.. �s �xa:.rkT.a ��,�. i—t-u:rtc:v r nv.,cn Lcavx aaN-e 1 K'l^Yli Sout h Elevation CITY OF ITE:.I: RANCHO CUCAMO GA TITLE: PLANNING DIVMN EXHIBIT: SCALE- .•— sF y` 3 r \ NC7zZd7d zxtr.JSs r, 71 IC A(YVZiS fj w IS oo .Y/T310[ ' Iv000 FJWA[ l+nZ AS'WILL' \ I I \ L'I _ vNJCI— i�t+/SHa Il •� � I � � / 11—�I�I Ill .�� i 1�--- \\YLNO71V wNTM] ]CI-V'J♦ \` \ SIUC Lo /![C[A "ALL a \vico ' F AX AS \VILG.CdA(NICTG II rO WALL STNOCTUNC CITY OF ITEM: P.��.`:CH0 CtiCA L ION A TITLE: S?—&- 2.rVAMONK- N oI t PULNNING DIVOON EXHIBIT: SCALE- RESOLUTION NO. 82-1OSA A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82-18 FOR ALTA LOMA ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND WILSON AVENUE IN THE R-1-20,000 \® ZONE WHEREAS, on the 1st day of September, 1982, a complete application vas filed by Lawrence Howard for review of the above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of November, 1982, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission reviewed and approved Conditional Use Permit 82. 18; and WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of July, 1983, a revised Co,:-ii " •-nal Use Permit application, was submitted for the above-described project; a-. WHEREAS, on the 9th day of November, 1983, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider revisions to the building design, site plan, and conditions of approval for the above-described project; and WHEREAS, approval of the revised Conditional Use Permit application shall void the previously approved site plan and building design, and Planning Camr.,ission Resolution No. 82-108. follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, and the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed; and 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. SECT10", 2 That t 1 iS �)T VJ_CL wi l l rot create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Neaative Declaration is issued on November 22, 1982. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 82-18 is approved subject to the foi owl ing conditions: Resolution No. 82-IOSA Page 2 PLANNING DIVISION 1. All laws and regulations of the State Department of Social Services reiat na to licensine of children's day care facilities shall be complied with prior to opening of the school . 2. Expansion of the preschool and kindergarten beyond 60 students will require the approval of a modified conditional use permit. 3. if the operation of this school causes adverse effects upon adjacent properties, the conditional use permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for their consideration and possible termination of such use. 4. Operation of the preschool and kindergarten shall not commence until such time as ail Uniform Building Code and Title 19 of the State Fire Marshall 'S Regulations gave been complied with. Plan- shall be submitted to the Foothill Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. ENGINEERING DIVISION 5. The church shall be required to participate in the Alta Loma Channel Assessment District and a written agreement to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to issuance of any building permits shall be executed. 6. The catch basin on Archibald, including connecting pipes, shall be reconstructed with Wilson Avenue Street improvements. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1985. PLANN 'G OYMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ue^.n 15 ijuu i,rjclr man ATTEST: '! Deput Secretary of the Panning Commission : I l - Resolution No. 82-10_ Q Page 3 1, RICK GOMEZ, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and `= reguiarly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of November, 1983, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, MCNIEL, JUAREZ, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: BAR;;Pa ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: VINE 0 (`Jr C.O. V rC� CCCC aOL LO LV' O 00 C �S �� Ym0 •e d� _ LyCC L� nC q d Vac O V C� _ Y p f- O V r C 9 •^ >. =cA Y _ o pr c� a• M is _ r`. c 'c':' c - ' u au yl P q C — T LVa Ya_ '^ or w=rr a' A " �c `�-..� c c - 4 .r.•L pr 6rQ� C'. V rYN d� �vA 9 l l S P E_ r6' C r P_LM _ V L — pVJ Lq ayL Zo L pCj PC✓� OA J6� 0 L_ .po O` Va r rO _ aC9 uCCr .V,. CL GQ ^ � O IC �C prY r0 •a ^C ` A r rC Jv NLSL rAV T r JY.p� OV C �a a J + Ya- co p�oTo� ` o•'' u '^ vo O V yr az c <co �l�•c (�� V v'•c ` oi, u A _ ,Ce� �",P 4_ t r_ OV 60+m 4V0 <+GL6 4JO.V LL 6A.�m <y Apr _.Lipp �-L r.O O r~ v Qa v� c o i -•L v u C a a V V O 5 V 27 qa C_ CO S J � jp �•_ =LC ,• � a.rL � VL apry 6L C ` La .r..0 _ •T-' Is CN oIL is V r • � N rl 6 f� C d L� ,o p V~ �O� ^r S C T O C V V � V— N < N pi • N o v Q LLO or 11 `t1 � `JI ` O J ( r r G L s ✓ L 4^ u w 6 O N V u _ N r d a ^ 41 _y ✓ 0=U q .r. q ^s O L roP L O u 6 ^ 9 O N C V f O ` O p9 q ✓_ E r c u n L C_ a Nu ✓� Cu�= _nor ✓V_._ .p 4N O G v.. .. T �o .. n• -J qu•— uiU`- N OEr-F O d T�� .'r ✓c_. n = ' G E V Z iJ.i q t yr � mcN L �a �_✓ d mNc > _c� a" r'_` 'ems� L P�_ C IL�� O Y7� Y� Gr {. L_ n� dnjby Nr VO O C ^ u GCq� N4 V <w� q y;N 0' 6.� C y N G✓_ w 6 V u q _�C _\ _ VGu '=� nigLn4 raY reCO� Ni' Oi Yr q0 �^^rT+ � O P. vN_ 2 c •.a V o ,;.or`o .. moon- bo.� _ r--2 z P Q C 9 G C a�& % m v V 6u O r_ `r P r� �. 4V F✓ N O✓ u n g V? u V Q O L ` ` „c `o cYn.Y 'Wca.`_ �� c_ o�c✓ '`^M ` c✓^,o,✓rrcN c_o rl=� 7a ov'= nrn mE F. >� _c. Loi_e c 1i.`. .' epL ...a TNT \r 6v C^C ? Da��DUJ 4 4L`-^N OQ�rL C� y a � •O d r O u.' N Pr`O O y T N C== q o w= >y G l) p 0 � >r C f u L r P O q .n Y r •� �V T�r ✓ N d ✓ ^ b C y� N O H O.rr U G C 9 � C Gy i✓ ¢� uc ` n =�^.Gcr q t� q v$�= p t V O 6 r r C� N ....C .' O � � ✓� P P d u � G NLi q rF ` ` N �? � �M i V a ✓ � N .Y CEO oSn SS .VL.•Y77� qpV V �` N Nd <r TV N q Nd C— t u mC r • rrn _i. 00V � d7 u0 O C ✓ GO n q YV -o .p. 4 cT c o ^:� . .,. -.. .,� cc v r_ Cv q uwu' r vn 4 7FgCar O.r aZ O _ � VnL `— pas � O Vn� C Cq � Gq N u ✓ = CL uC > p GnC`,. d_ ✓ C � q d _ G L O� b� � Y q d� _ C O O C V C i 6 Cl_ C C GV lOr6 p O OwOq VOra uL GO Pupa o r �� 4 0 `� V i a c ^ ❑`o _ _ � o + N N o ) ` c r� c v P` c �� 4` uI C ✓ >G V w V V d ✓ Jq pur f� .Vi.a N q'e � V O ,O O.4 `� P� a .'w C 9 I t✓(V n N� N 6` u/ G'� O -1 • / -10 GG M6' P O^ T C^ r - NeiC b V V .�• C _ M G p w 4 n •I v O O_ q `^` •• ✓ .Ge �pOP N- I Or-J SV NO � '�. o N= L r � ✓ .b c 7 O � P r-V S N O P V c0 L V r g d C C N O G 0 ar� C UL l � 1 �OD 7yp N L Vq0 09 JP� G >C V �V LG. p y3 v a tz K=9 � � 9 qV LLgp C � LVv L_ 'S G. �✓rL � p p _ G ryj V V_.Vr per` LrL L_M ✓ L-Jw 9= L P G d✓ N V �• L >� >✓ Ld 9� LOr\ G J c V� 9 ✓ ._ dC wC GLOP ~ 9 L' N S ✓_ C >O w p C M 6d C G N q V= V Pr�� C p_ GL Ca GpO VV T•. r "Lpp NSTp GON Er ✓0=r0 L4 >. r_ p'C.P paC Pp � "� y V ��. _✓ �Jj n � ` 9.0 V p i l �_. G_ C P✓ p a "'< C T b _P T E E {G� � '..- .'.✓..G. _ N ^gyp. _ xa- ec soi _ _ G O✓ � _-�✓ P r V i _ T O-L P p _ O L C L G N 4 > .•. V. T N r L ✓r N O y p C C C V< Lr JC p-f � O Y Vy� CS CO -w C _ O V T - C f_' �� C C' 4�< ✓ V Q P�r 4 G G N O 2-1 L c 6p� On 6 � Pam r Nc�L NNp 3 +i ✓ L E� � e� +i <D-6i Ow N d-4 _CG _C'r GC 4_ L PL _ 4Lr `r _ C L T p � •� -V p V C >' y� G �O� .Y/• .'.. O C•�Ga O ✓ _rM T_ 0 V b O L L G _ g y r C _ V • V L[�� G V ._ O �• G - G� O p l r_ � G. C blV O c C O_- a. .-...=- OCr it Qy PG \S O ✓ry O. NV NO rJ �LV P6C pG � =�YL O .• w - q¢ PPC G V p_ G_ b T L r G 6 G - C 6 r 'n C r w = ✓r q 0 G• q n ^a P � • ON rOC�Cp � C L_ � l P C_ N � N d =L 0 `' p - C G S T Y p ■ _ - C O NC >' _ pC _ - OOCLT ONVq• �> �. ✓ t1..1� C` ?_ • _ J F rCOL O.O CF _ � ` pe` L VV. G T - TrM O E u ei r o •• : G - ucToJ_ r p n � Da L p✓� N :.e -N c d 0151 c P L 4 c y 4 L q T c VLP .n O✓ �r� - _ yT p - C ' Na Y _Gc VW -L c o<o v y ✓ o .-`p c r=_ c c p :cG < 4G CF OG - V_ [ ••C ✓ V L• T -- c o .. G - C O T C C ~� \ \ O G I G V �P N _ 4 L C Y C O •. = - t o�. f.� 6 TL Gi ✓ 6� _ = cIc C� 4 1''-. y > Gr YG .• y ��- \ _ ip_✓ V 06. .1 C D Lip _ .Ni � S� p 4' M CCC •n `�`_ LC d N^r _ V p NN .La .• V = ra ✓ - r'r_.GG.�� r M O{ C� L - NM1� LLG G JT 4A ` V '-= C .✓r. F"' cV dq Veu CLP GG Np~ �°. _ •.� u i.Y. zT o -'•'L oa.Lr E F .. _r�rtr <+ 04 r.�mo Gi.ri�=tee: <r•_ <� �w Y.nue o: d' .r y p O � O Is n 0 J ryV V 6V � C pV L 'G r_ L_ Lq 4 0 fT.5 o.oM >j .. c4W �4 E_ r.or o Sai oL v 3 a>p,Pa'cm Iz - A— pq ra YOG -E w y= rC yl r` NVCV�� a� 6�c� J^ b y J 6 N C `:]q 'G C u V C d G L U •^ C {{{{ 6 C tf p_c a Vy,r VL ^ Mi _ eC OJ PL �V C• P L.Vi L_O ._ >_. ...c - non �I om _ _ _. .y _ _ � •. n= e.L..o,.N aoa � �=A 6 J 6_�+,r N y`�q.�p N Nq� y y Q W•••V W u U � G V 7 6 1 6 r < P V t V,r O tV Q 'I qb •r C+ ¢' q rr �.��.� r LL•A 6— V l PG p i •I '7 r C C Qr O if p y q V�A G n C (y 1C d � y i O •' i �=� CVOs • r — - q O I C 60 qd ! I I nn EL .w � ✓ 4j yC'� � I ..' j Cr�V a` � w V i L s r r O t O V O O I..c• E 4 0 Qi S � I wV Vor •nMiO a _ !' � jAq !, rCC q� p PN O .. E d C y 1 LG7 y .p. 00 PL ^f Ly C� 90 6Qb< <0 VG ` rC� L I Q L� Oc r _ IE..� u E i ngry FG. a rG _; r.. I4 C O Si •O.. Q,. `' O � •\' O I I C q0 edM A qr r _ GO py V O � E C t O O N a r J �' G L 4 r r n • C 7 d { - N C✓O C` ✓ f 7 � C� i7 L v 1 coy y > 0 �.. G =9Do L o c :,ay ,�� u <_. .,co �c 4= E c= —C O•.. E 0- L � I `I 1 I Ujly , :cii I YCern N �.c ^'_ y� n« gym g•.. ` I . � • 1 � R v c c y VO C� •- y c N L. V L O q ti b u t p=V rJ 7 c ✓ a C a Y{ �C y ( o q n s c, `✓d e r �� `�I /i �� I i c �e I aeY�= Svc —.r y' �+— cE. � I rc uE c✓ ✓.Y.{ vo ry7 CV-J ✓� ✓ E 4I ' I 4 9 C LCC .l l �j �^ EC- y �4 ✓ t yrO6 r �. � d »q LOV >CT= qG y✓ ` '� I 9_ V ✓ of O L T✓ O c c O r C a0 - q 0 < 6� 4 V f' > V O f o' C t L C G« ` ✓ r � O V n2G Gz �r , 0 aqrr _ r •r..✓ O V C � « N Y Y Cfy ` .^ - FL� O- 4 .nE OrM C ✓ CCC � N r 'e- ` ` c -fvv - Vrc. E WC O CCC qy i 4 V O r i G� 10 Yy J^ Cq eY CV'. V T< E4 E qIq 9G _ - C 15 Em . c nq cc 'c.?. c«�✓c Gv._ u =c•� `-= dl ao a � I `oq Y �. - c qe Yam _ q-r=�1 ccE a �-�T- 4� YI - y -.N.•. 1 ' Y .. L= C� PLC • T ±C .=n OT ' qG yr Cr 'y'E, vi .r,.- w� �\�f O^. l « - J G O C u. C - � Gi LJr O .n nC C � @•f.. -C: _ q4 pq u " .Jr �o•� c+ .cao Cp- E- ..c-r so oo` c� '' .'. g,_ � I '> u� T— _ I rM c lipc i ) 43 4 .O•.Oi •O.. O � V b C� C� C •O+ � 4 L A a C i , •J ~ w V FV 4+G O I { M C `o o I -. �� 9q .. t•__ 4 N S rV eN dV y �I .C.rV `pL vG •Fi0 � d•rLE a I ` 'an yN - 1 r y n4 ` L L � p0 OD eP EG W I Ia LO C •1 I an � P rl sr c /\�}I �5.o c ` ✓d n i � low+ � ro � y � dN t - yl < Io d V M o C V I V q c n C O y c w c + Nc_ — rJl � n C J G O n 4 L O� .V. � C •I W V�V `v � TV O F� O= p w�I O WI Vq r GOV_ 7pi .• q j}j�n C V4 LC ON _ o - T� \ � �i r a V— Gr �= d C •in n V L .air C O •n wEc N �y " Nar + _ r •, 4 LyN r7 ML N C iP0 `1 `d _ � ` 0 ZL EZ a I N y4 `p qnc-•' Ir rrE My rr N X� 'rMCN N O W O'h C q a L r_ t � T V P O ` V n E 1 r �W � �t q r _ N • N_'6� Z= T SINCV r 4TCy r 4_ d0 � •Ay �� O a N` C`� IL � d0 GCV Cr GOO Wi Or �p 00 q CV r9LCy VC Ir -• C y G o y < ` ^ V •-) r • r O g d P Y y C N V 0 - T •�G ��' Y L C- ?� q 9 V L L q• � A C C a p V a M V noC `� O - C•i"' �V a GVV N PV =rTV = t _ rC Qa NL C'Jr Ny ` yd L�}+� ' L e m G= u_ E u-•i V .' L L t n w �+� V F O V E!y� G P r F V T O�yn.� 1v >� t G oo y qa— F L — L —+ � L •. ��.�. '^ n_ naT i„ �`o m .e __ E O^ �•' V_ q _ q� ` jYY ^°!7y 6y� 0 < ra `�L Ny ram= LC C- ^ VVbC T r C O_ G J M1'V L V Ve q r d? C 'J T V= Vr < � E nw� •n `G.c.i� <:.+ No%o N+Nu o�y to c'� Wr NL ��L� SG .o+v _ ��( j �/�,��\vim �v�•s. pp a F O V CJ O L 1 A L ` • ate c ` — G � •. Lr- 90 �J GL qrN KLY P GAG i6 �— ' 114r40.rL rl RESOLUTION NO. 82-108B A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING THE REVISED DESIGN OF A 9400 SQUARE FOOT MULTI-PURPOSE BUILDING FOR FIRST ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND WILSON AVENUE IN THE "VL" DISTRICT. WHER'crS, on the 1st day of September, 1982, a complete application was filed by Lawrence Howard for review of CUP 82-18; and WHEREAS, on the 9th day of March, 1983, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission reviewed and approved revised CUP 82-18 for First Assembly of God Church; and WHEREAS, the Design ?eview Committee recommends approval of the proposed redesign; and WHEREAS, approval of the revised building design shall void the previously approved elevations. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolves as follows: SECTION 1: FT_NDINGS: 1. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the character of the surrounding area and will create a harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated in the General Plan of the City. 2. That the proposed development, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed development will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. SECTION 2: CONDITI0NS OF APPROVAL: The Planning Commission approves the revised building design and finds that all conditions contained in Resolution 82-108A for CUP 82-18 shall remain in full force and effect. In addition, the following condition steal? apply: µ` 1. Variegated earthtone colored tile shall be used on the proposed building. A sample of the actual file r to be used shall be submitted to the Planning f: Division for approval prior to issuance of building permits. Resolution 82-108B Page 2 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22nd DAY Or FEBRUARY, 1984. PLAn�i1" tr viii it SSION OF THE C 1 i OF RA1Vl.ilD l.UC.MONUH BY Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, F-,-sed, and adopted by the Planning Commissior, cf the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of February, 1984, by the follcwing vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 9' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CgCAJ,0 STAFF REPORT �R k. old :r� to I9i7 DATE: February 22, 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 11549 - LE'dIS - A residential tract subdivision of 52 acres into 90 lots in the Very Low district located between Etiwanda and East Avenues, south of Summit Avemie - APN 225-181-02 through 04, 06 through 09, 26 and 43. I. BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting a twelve month time extension for Tentative Tract 11549, as described above. The project was originally approved by the Planning Commission on March 11, 1981 as a 90 lot subdivision of approximately 20,000 square foot lots. However, on April 1, 1981 the City Council set aside the decision through an appeal of the Planning Commission action; at issue were the traditional rigid street pattern, stayed tract design, excessive windrow removal, and a general concern that the proposed subdivision was out of character with the Etiwanda community. As a result, the applicant was requested to revise the subdivision and an informal subdivision committee was appointed to work with the applicant to resolve concerns. Finally, the City Council approved a revised project on May 6, 1981 and issued a rew set of conditions of approval as attached. Subsequently, Design Review apprcval for 27 homes within Phase I of Tentative Tract 11549 was granted on October 28, 1931 by the Planning Commission. The current expiration date is May 6, 1984. The developer is requesting a 12-month time extension to May 6, 1985. This is the final time extension that may be granted for this map. All lots wit'- this tract must be recorded prior to the expiration date. IT. ASeALYSIS: Since the approval of this project, the Etiwanda peci vc Plan was developed and adopted. Therefore, in order to consider a time extension, this project was reviewed for conformance with the Etiwanda Specific Plan requirements. Based upon this review the following inconsistencies with the Basic Development Standards for the Very Low district were noted: 1' ITEM 3 jo PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Time Extension - TT 11549/Lewis February 22, 1984 Page 2 10 i_ Equestrian Trails - A single local feeder trail is provided along the southerly tract boundary. This tract is located in the equestrian, rural area which requires local feeder trail access to each lot. The Etiwanda Specific Plan designates community trails along Etiwanda, Summit, and the south boundary of the tract. Future development to the south will be required to dedicate the public community trail, . Sufficient dedication fcr the trail or, Et ir'arida has been provided far. 2. Summit Avenue - The community trail required along Summit Avenue requires 20 feet of dedication as measured from the curb face. This will require an additional 5 feet of dedication. 3. Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District - The three lots facing Etiwanda Avenue require front yard landscaping. 4. Streetscape landscaping - The Etiwanda Specific Plan establishes a street theme through landscaping guidelines for Etiwanda, East and Summit Avenues beyond that required by the standard conditions of approval for street trees. 5. Minimum average lot size - 25,000 sq. ft. lot size is required vs. 20,250 sq. ft. minimum average lot size provided. 6. Setbacks - A number of discrepancies exist in the development plans for Phase I mainly for interior side building setbacks. Hewever, in no case is the discrepancy greater than 5 feet from the requirement. 7. Minimum Lot Width - A 90-foot lot width is required at the front (30-foot) setback line. Eighteen Inns out of 90 lots do not meet the requirement. These occur mainly on the cul-de-sacs and knuckles. 8. Garages - The Etiwanda Plan requires 50 percent of all garages to be detached, side-on or set back farther than the front of the house. Approximately 40 percent of the garages within Phase I meet this requirement. 9. Minimum number of elevations./footprint - The Basic Development Standards require eight different footprints with four elevations for each footprint. Phase I plans indicate eleven footprints with 1, 2, or 4 elevation designs per footprint. a - k PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Time Extension - TT 11549/Lewis February 22, 1984 Page 3 Items 1 through 4 would have a significant effect on the appearance of tha project, therefore it is reco,,mnended that additional conditions of approval , with consent of the applicant, be added to the project to require compliance with the Etiwanda Specific Plan provisions. The applicant has agreed to accept these additional conditions per the attached letter. Items 5 through 9 are not considered to be significant and would not significantly alter the appearance of the project. If the Planning Commission agrees with this analysis, staff recommends adoption of the attached Resolution to approve the time extension. The only other alternative would either be to gain the consent of the applicant for more changes or deny the time extension. III. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Comrission consider all material and input relative to this project. A Resolution of approval is provided should the Commission decide to grant the extension. Respe /tfull sub ted, Ric Gom z Cit P1 nner RG DC:jr At achments: Letter From App?icant Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit 118" - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "C" - Phasing Plan Exhibit v, - Phase I Site Plan Exhibit "E" - Elevaticns - Series 543 Exhibit "F" - Elevations - Series 587 Exhibit "G" - Elevations - Series 640 Exhibit "H" - Elevations - Series 647 City Council Resolution of Approval Planning Commission Resolution Approving Phase I Time Extension Resolution of Aeproval 2, LFFWIS PHONIES 1156 Noll` Mountain Avenue/P.O.Ft---- 670/Upland.CA 91786/ 714 9BS0971 January 18, 1984 :y�3 a l,1ii;;i';-i^ i 141516 Rick Gomez c« . , _ c A 6y r :Gnner City of Rancho Cucamonga P.. 0. Bar. 807 Rancho ^:camcr,;._ , CA 91730 °ubje _: Tentative Tract No. 11549 Dear Rick: The tentative map was approved in 1981; the first extension of time will expire May 6, 1984 (P.C. Re:.olution No. 83-48). The tract is a three-phased develop- ment. We expect to record the first phase in 30 to 45 days and are completing the engineering design on the latter two phases. However, due to the time the City requires for checking and processing the plans, we may not be able to meet the May 6 deadline. Therefore, we hereby request that Tentative Tract Map No. 11549 be extended for an additional twelve months. Cordially, LEWIS HOMES OF CALIFORNIA ' KJL c RON NOTTINGHAM! Engineering Coordinator RN:Jgc LEWIS HOMES 1156 North Mountain Avenue/P.O.Box 670!Upland.CA 91786/7U 985-0971 February E, 1984 City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attel;tion: Michael Vairin Subject: Tract No. 11549/Extension of Tentative Tract Map Dear Michael : We appreciate the opportunity to discuss the new requirements of the Etiwanda Specific I,Ian and its impact on our extension. After considering your input, we would hereby agree to accept the additional conditions as we discussed and itemized as follows: 1. Develop Summit Avenue in accordance with the Etiwanda Specific Plan which will require an additional five feet of dedication. 2. Provide buiidinc_ setbacks in accordance with the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 3. Landscape the front yards of the houses facing Etiwanda Avenue in accordance with Figure 5 26 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 4. Work out an acceptable equestrian trail plan with City Committee. 5. Provide number of house plans and elevations as shown in Figure 5-45 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan Cordially, LEWI�S HOMES OF CALIFORNIA RON NOTTINGHAM Engineering Coordinator RN:jgc �_ 5 9 FEWIS DOMES 1156 Nonh Mountain Avenue/ P.O.Box 673/Upland.CA 91786/ Ad 9854)7, �i i I February 8, 1984 City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Cha£fey/Garcia House Gentlemen- Ron Nottingham, of our office, said you wanted a letter regarding the disposition of the Chaffey/Garcia house which is on the property we own in EtIwanda known as Tentative Tract No. 11549. Obviously, we recognize the historical significance of the house. We have made a commitment which we will, of course, honor to pay reasonable moving costs (the number we have been using is $6,000 to $7,000 to move the house) in the immediate area of our property. We ask your cooperation in finding a site soon as eventually we do intend to develop t:zis property. Further, we do have concerns abcut vandalism and fire and would hope that the move can be completed soon so that the house could be in a more protected area. Please call if you have any questions. Very truly ycLrs, LEWIS HOMES I Richard A. Lewis RAL/er r ..k-v"quandary w we ...c ai50 been suggested as alternatrveS' �X+ C•pnnCL SaIQ stlanri a**+ _1y;f_4 eat• ,�r� air � Cne of the oldest buildings in the West End of San -home can survive-a mile g trip down'Et�a �r Berim County has been derzed Et'.•n to ,,Avenge. ' "r �•.�._ : . -, ..,..z move to a permanent location. :. ' •'-: . • - •!`They have attested to the struelsal,integrity of Consequently. Etiwanda's historic g3affey-Garci2 the home,".Frost said house mdy' soon be on the •road, :said Rancho -.,.A similar report was issued several years ago. Cucamonga Citi•Councilman Jim Frost ' - ---But little effort was then..made to move the bomr- The 114y ear old home is scheduled to•be on "The stmc"•ure is on its original site in afield north display somewhere along Etwanda Avenue during a of Highland Avenue. Lewis Homes owns the property historical homes tavr in May. and plans-to build homes there. The company has lrr the meantime,the Etiwanda Historical Society offered to pay "reasonable" moving costs for.the has been making some headway to preventing Chaffey-Garciahome. .. . s :.; further deterioration of the strticture. - A mover has bid to relocate the home for 'f- "Serious" plumbing ieahs have been patched and r Frost said. - 1 part of the home's-dilapidated_roof have been :. . •'But that doesn't go'into expanses other than. covered.Frost said picking it up and setting, it back down. It a dwles "The old pipes are in very serious condition,"he (costs from) cutting. a road, trees; ramps nd said "One lealrwas patched and it caused some :'foundations." a -:_ ' others." ►::i:i :i: A new site has`notbeen negotiated. althougli Froc2, a member of the society and a descendent;i-Frost said there is hope the home will be relocated of one of Etiwanda's pioneer families,said the group, along the west-side of Etiaanda Avenue near the h2s received word from a movmg company that the Congregational Church "'•'r-: ?: .••: _ ti '• 2 t� ley.-r � •.'t 0' 1 F i I � i I E I r I I 77 ! I ,I Routes0 MUMMMMMMEA �64,wula kitiwe Cive�lau� D;'striai J IV NORTH CITY OF ITL�I- I t sa 9 RANCHO CUC y`'10NGA TITLE: L-nr A7l n Q i111r4-� PLAINNI\G DIVISION E\Ii1IiIT:_AISCALE: ! ! n� n_g �� - I !� •1 �e..r rr..t w. �� ;; n..r ��Yc � � {..r w• � — —>...r e=..i a...�'` G �r wrsr • I fGCGw_J: i a a 11 --] . I -- _��•-. I � �� .aa =�.�Fr •...r.v rw+ �t l!e �j N �{0� s� � + !N, 1 rr. 1��•.......�i ..... �D 1 Mr<�.�_{L) �`{. �Ie �1 '.'1` STw WAY i mEb l� rr.rr•r•.:::. '-.. : ... .rt.... - . .� _.. .��,� �( % w90, a. 7:rsIA a-irLi iLv..•rr�ti�•L%r_�- l�—ay'��l>~�J...:��3 n t~ so.aa �'<tR"a'?t= -Gr.�:i}��r�'� .�- _ � 4'`y. a� .` k i `i .'d •r �' ,f n n��3... /1� j. :.u�I.v..n �i ;a.�.i':: •t ��` ,��"��• .s, --•3-i. '��. r .'—'_may=t�.l �''� N •�I �1 • �d"� �5 fir. �'.-�'r`�-r,-• -Z�� ,��+�':t^X�.,rr'__��.. :!^,w�-'� _.:, - -J�y _ .�• i. 1:,,�1_©I�d' � M—N+u •�.x 't. './"rr.� �! a c a y1 1 'I 1>1?�''�,,// Y9�,1 4D� u� -� cr jI *Keax�i iY' a 79 Tt-- 7,42 .:�.�-t...r.y}' .� r' _ - �'� �' ._� +:= ,ria- 1 iyY��y� X y'�� -� .. ..�ISt�•'�. _ . 'UES"f�34N -� Tj'A14. (E77LVA41?:)A jGhN j��S�Ilrrif7Ey NORTH CITY OF ITEM: RANCHO C Cr.-k'%IQNGA TITLE: AfTF—��-�a�� I'IANNING DIVISION EM llMT- 1�2 - 'C-%LE- 2-9 1 `%^i"w�p-.'�.� +8 G��I . _ 1••a., -_ - `K•=-�:.PJy .w 5 ¢ ---_. n�� -. I�/ .__i_.�' ;r.. � Igs:D 10 -- . .- -R-a--.T..r.l....o....s.�.�•...m.....r• ...essu.T...r..r la ,k NORTH CITY OF TiTLE: _ PLcV NNING DIVISION E.\ii1BIT:-- _SCALE- .:+a-,,.i„�." �*�F��;��«-+er��a�r�'�';'yF�'='�r7„��,;,^•:' 1:.11 "sr�_=-'terra-�-;�.,_ . tl S r.J f _.j, 1 ��i"' ::�•��.:..<-M s. w�•f;�... a :SX.r� i'. � F��.c i^.'�-. y �I � •, 4 l F-� j� � r � 1, F V� -s `• � a z`= o- :I: -.� .'�yf,�r•7�.�!.c ':,t- +S � "`Y r'.-�.+ „-/ 7 � \ 7! � Aj 7.1 :�r��-`�ii ��T"?'i ..F' �- r ��lJ+j��/ �//� � � ��-.�. .�y�9_I y,..•i r-=. -� � .�"-�.� ^ � �yy � �YJ•7_ Lf �T�7- fV.GMY r'1as� erG�� IV_ i^ 5 `1:4.J,-.-' �: ._ �_ T w •1+yr,T •'1 i.).:-c•• rR' �p.rJl i+er CITE' OF ITE11: 7! 5� RANCHO CUCA`,10\G.k TFrLE: NA5C— T. PcA+� PLANNING DIV SION EX :It;M _SCALE: 94 CITY OF ITEM: : RANCHO CUC-1.L\10. TITLC PLI.NNENG DIVOONT Ro t Wry:rt (`"(F- t 1 -•�4-1 � 1 I ' I I i I i � 1 v� �rh t •--r.�_ f _��e-"� _C __ it___-1��.+'4"" -=`�-��'.:--sir•-d....-v"---�2:�"-�',..>:t'': � 1 ^S(W1IS_—NOMj'l - Ilbl�lrlr �T cspg��`Vl•ITGV i� i ,IE WIS NCMf1 CA 1 Mlli _ ' ,u�.r�3q . lull, a P!• lii.3 (1 'I' 3`'�—.. NORTH CITY Or ITE.I: T 7 ® RANCHO CUGIL\,10\GA TITLE• PL.ziu\T,I\G DIVISION EXI HBIT: SC.NLE- Q> .. . .-- �..G4lhpi1173•. i owls woMvs �� —I ..Ite A>r • .. ,- ` � II •a I a �taw a�\�l ati ~ - LLwls nobles _ -'_ 'Sal•R4013.1- '.LL WIS =0M(3 '}�L'� •I��.I, I�I�iI�L ��ll i ..� . v1r!ri �" i 1'�. ' zi•�"`�. �y till NORTH CITY OF ITEM I: RANC-1O CUCAl'I().\ TA TITLE F�� .1 �,^,•c 1� 3 , �6 PL kNNING DIXrGl(>N EXI Ill' SG%LE:3��AXA" - 711 TT I re tLL AM,- I .9 -MAC. tttw;s "Omts All NORTH CITY 01-7 RAINCHO CUCACNIONGA TITLE: PL.;%-'-\Nl'\'G DIVISION H IT; SCXLE- RESOLUTION NO. 81-64 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUUL!ONCA, CALIFORNIA. CONDITIONALLY APPROVING. TENTATIVE TF1.;,T `LV NO. 115.9. 1.'BEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 11549. hereinafter ""tap" Uy Levis Homes, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a residential subdivision of 52 aces located on the southwest corner of Summit and East Avenues Into 90 lots, came before the City Council on appeal of Planning Commission approvZ1 of said Tentative Map; and WRERE:S, the City Council set aside the planning Commission approval at its meeting of April 1, 1961; and WHEREAS, the applicant has revised the Tentative Map as requested. NOV, THEREFORE, the City C-,until of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as folivws: SECTION I: Fiadines: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract Is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed! general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial eevirotmental damaqe and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; W The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public helach problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the prcposed subdivision. (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on Lae environment and the Negative Declaration issued is upheld by the Planaing Commission. SECTIC`: Z: CO`:DITIO::S CF APPROVAL: Tentative Tract Yap G. No. 11549, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject }� to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: N' PLA:;NING DIVISION" �L-t71 1. The Garda House shall be preserved by reloatioc to another site at the expense of the developer. The developer shall work with the Director of Coeunir: Services and the City 1!istroic Cpmmisticn to find an appropriate location. i Resolution 5o. 81-64 Page 2 2. A detailed plan indicating which trees are needec to be ' removed aad where new windrows shall be planted, shall be J submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to final approval of map. The developer shall be responsible I for pl.,nting new windrows vhere deemed apDrop- .ate by the City Planner. 3. The Palm trees near the Garcia House shall be relocated 666 to the Etivandu Avenue frontage by the developer. This shall be shown on the dataiied tree plan. 4. Combined driveways shall be required for lots with vehicular I access to Summit and East Avenues. i 5. The Map shall be revised in substantial compliance with Exhibit "C" and revised Exhibit "D". 6. Front yard setbacY3 along Summit and East Avenues shall be no less than 40% 7. Front yard setbacks on interior cul-de-sac streets shall average 35'. S. Side yard setbacks on corner lots shall be no less than 15', and all other setbacks shall meet the requirements of the R-1-20 Zone. 9. Phasing of the subdivision shall provide for construction to occur from Etivanda Avenue toward East Avenue to allow for the ultimate determinatior of East Avenue. Street - width and improvements through the Etivanda Specific Plan. 10. All Street `lames shall reflect a Historical perspective. � I 11. Prior to recordation of the Final Tract :tap the applicant s:,all submit and receive approval of a stun change to R- 1-20 by the Planning Commission. 12. Street trees along Etlwanda, Summit and East Avenues shall be of specimen size. A variety of 1-gallon eucalyptus trees, 15' o-e. shall be planted along the interior streets of the subdivision. ApproDriaie tree wells to protect such trees shall also be installed by the Developer. 13. A temporarry cul-de-sac shall be constructed within proposed street R.O.W. at the north boundary of the tract. 14_ All cul-de-sacs shall be 50-Foot right-of-way, with 36- C foot pavement, cortzining concrete rolled curbs, but no t sidewalks. The major east-west "S" s-reef shall. be 60- foot right-of-wav, 36-foot pavement and have a standard esb and sidewalk (the sidewalk to use brushed colored t concrete); the north side having a concrete rolled curb and no sidewalk. EFCICEERI:IC Di CI5Tm 1..5. 7ltimate width of -zt Avenue shall be dutcrmined by i 1 Etivanda Specific Plan and required right-of-way per the specific plan shall be deditated to the City. Resolution %o. 81-61 i P=Ee 3 ill i 16. Existing damaged rock curb and gutter on Etiwanda Avenue shall be repaired with similar type materials to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 17. Width of storm drain easements shall be per Clty standards *and requirements. ® 18. Street improvemerts shall be required contiguous to those percels which are "not a part" as shown on tentative map. 19. The stub end street shall have a temporary cul-de-sac bulb as per City standard. BUILDI\C DIt•ISIO?7 20. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed, guaranteeing ! completion of all on-site drainage facilities necessary for dwatering all ;arcels, to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division. • 21. Appropriate easements, for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted unto or over adjacent parcels, are to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building and Safeq• Division. I 22. On-site drainage improvements. necessary for devatcring or protecting the subdivided properties, are to be installed prior to issuance of bui7ding permits for constt crion upon any parcel that may be subject to, or contributes to, drainage flows entering, leaving or within a parcel relative to which a building permit is requested. 23. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building ...d Safety Division for apprcval prior to issuance of b--id ing permits. (This may be on an incremental or composite basis.) PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6ch day of May, 1981. AYES: Frost, Hikels, Palombo, Bridge, Schlosser NOES: None ABSZ-I: None - 9"v//,1,za Phillia/D. Schlosser, Havor AITEST: 7.aUrCn :!. w.l5 a`T.Sn• City l.lU.n t� O + - r C � 'O .a n r � � � y _' L Y.✓ L Y C rl C V +J S C C L P O u « > V a O V M r O O O T L � V•-•�'V_ rr0- u O ✓r-JU 72 vOi� CO.-"J � _ GV _ U_ .+ C [ C•+ G ' � _V n N ' 4 C 1r9 CV +r O_ CV ar LL wy 7� G � c� w.� L a V l n � V C -� •v u _ � .n O 4 j� N � V n o r w_ rnL w C4 O 4 \ S .- S VO _a rr q�.. 4V N i I Si L J C I pu c_ Z; ` b Y C > -V COL v 'J uJ.T a Lop +. r ao _ wo L -o "mac p • q C u -_ O i � L C 4 G V U I I _+i I � I •I � I ` I — �Ot �� c .•. .o u o < _., u-cT - =..• c c to Loc -J-2 n..- �I W _ r e VCG ^ = 2 TV O L ENV r� i- -a •n^C qV0 .7 V - - C � q L W `N U �•G.• ? G' O' � •Gi•V <Ov � - CL y. � ' O V UY UO�C.r •10•a N G Y � L - - VG _ _ P C CC - r r- hL.. yU„ VV r•ry Yrq i�1 r V.L c l C a - L a L T r T _ O v V O r u G _ ry•..r �`-.•� n .n0 F <9 '] L V C P-fir CO � V nO PC V G v - � J_� _ -r• S -r� 6 r q d c t _ J g 9 c __ _ __ p _ _ -JP rGO � �G •n ' O C P_ P � _ �•- L C C w • r �• `' U -_ VCj 1 r< Jr C _ -I 4 _� _ u• V� Ll''_..-. Vr wyp ULr rV,, V � CC;l til � I ryl nl yl •O .pl �I DI PI ��`I •� ^- �' 2-J L ZT ^ _ _� 9 �_C ^ L✓_� v r S O V O � O OI Cc� OV O V _ O'i•V O - VU - V� _ - � - G - O I{ _ O G_ r _ Q > - .n V u ' C•'J C r = _ W 0= L S n LA ., �- _u u -- U• �. •'�O L M .n� L O p a V �� V N LL M O __ .t 4d _ � UU rCy G= r VN LVur i - 4 zz _ �.� GC- rE -J rg -JQ _ O -� 2 C .�i �Lu CT -N O ^ UN `C •__ •- � Ci C IS r _ u OL V C L^JVOu r=u �,. CO J � i f'Cu� _ � � � yu N r 00 ~_ _ El C � � •-4 .n uur - V yd V -n C } -I n JO 72 _. o•- :. _- ` 1 EL •J '_— A f� � —.. > O — "' O = C >.0 `--' BYO �s � '' L � I I I Lrli l4 J l .n n V G G 1 4J tfZ ?.4 O V•J W U ..r J G M •.] f �G_ N t' O� � O V n�� — zf- 77 _ or T� --a e J G•... c '� '— o - - o c. t�L� C✓. Gv ��.: w G L O V �_ �� - G +• L O C� C� - ... _ _ . V _ q r i �7 _• C O r _ ' i- y it - r c � ice,- - cM I � j � —° _ a . � _ _= _ � � = _ b .•.`.cvto u o J 72 v _ T ✓ L 'J T J _ r d .. _ __ ... K _ O r ` � C C N - C_ `_ �V C I •��V n P C � ` 0 0 r Lu �n l 1 RESOLUTION IM. 81-126 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMCINGA PLANNING MIMISSION APPROVING SITE PLAN AND DESISN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11549-1, LOCATED ON T:'. EAST SIDE OF ETI'WANDA AVENUE, BEMEEN SUMMTf AVENUE AND HIGHLAND AVENUE IN THE R-1 ZONE. WHEREAS, on the 25th day of September, 1981, a complete ..,:,. . .. ....aS . ti . p L c om pan , appl ;.=ana for yt: the above-described project; and WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee has reco- nended approval of said project, with appropriate conditions; and WHEREAS, the project pcint rating excc-ds the minimum threshold as required for the Design Quality Section of the Growth Management ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Rancho Cucanonga Planning Coranission does hereby resolve as follows : SECTION 1: Findinos: 1. The design and layout of the proposed development ® is consistent with the applicable elements of the City's General Plan and any adopted architectural criteria for specialized area, such as design-,ted historic districts , theme areas, specific plans, community plan, boulevards, or planned developments. 2. The design and layout of the proposed development will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoy-ment of neighboring existing or future devel- opments, and will not create t,•affic or pedestrian hazards. 3. The architectural design of the proposed develop- ment is compatible with the character of the surroundine neighborhood and will maintain the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by this Ordinance and the General Plan of the City. 4. The desiqn of the proposed development would pro- vide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors throuch rood aesthetic use of materials, texture and color that will r^main aesthetically aopeal- ino and will retain a reasonably adequate level of maintenance. 1 sb k� �. b: 1 ' M� K+ / l .r . S r � I _sw V I I I G� • 7 4 _ r V _ � � G O u � V { T i y _ .Vu - � •• C c r J C - L �- y 1 04'�\_ J ! CO 44 �.Vi .n I: UC jG ^ �• '� r0 C.J -J " C 1 OCR _ r - Cr•] _O^ OOr �- - "LG �I C J Ln P _ +•V Y.— _ L.� V� 00� <V L— urV _r ` yC G .C.. L � � _ - OOC _ L C ` 1 ! e II 1 G J < < t�� s - _ � � �� _ _ = .o � _ _ _ � � o b __ O �� i U Z ' OV C �) 9 � \ �„. �/ J� � G C � ��t.i G N 'J +` G' c O ^ � � V ~ 6' C:� O � � � aJ _W as � C•- � U r �^ E �, _ 0 6- `o �m u q V T Y � q �� '0 �� O 'G�J Oe' C 0 �9 r O r � _ _ �f CG � 'n ^J C_ __ O � � _ V O G O J '� O C r GU O O � 9=J. _- - �_ C� �_ �_ � �- O _V _ _ _ j7 � C � � _ q � ��i _ -� _ 'J � _ _ G G^ � C' � C _ - O C O G�+ C n� � G G G C�� < < � N �O � RESOLUTION NO. 81-126 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COt,MISS10N APPROVING SITE PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11549-1, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, BETWEEN SUMMIT AVENUE AND HIGHLAND AVENUE IN THE R-1 ZONE. WHEREAS, on the 25th day of September, 1981, a complete application was filed by the Lewis Development Company, applicant for u;c auuVa-dcSCr iucu' Ni vj cCt; plod WHEREAS, the Design Rev-sew Committee has recommended approval of said project, with appropriate conditions; and WHEREAS, the project point rating exceeds the minimum threshold as required for the Design Quality Section of the Growth Management ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Rancho Cucame-.ga Planning Commission does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: Findings: ® 1. The design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with the applicable elements of the City' s General Plan and any adopted architectural criteria for specialized area, such as designated historic districts, theme areas, specific plans, community plan, boulevaris, or planned developments. 2. The design and layout of the proposed development will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future devel- opments, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazar s. 3. The architectural design of the proposed develop- ment is compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by this Ordinance and the Generai Plan of the City. 4. The desiqn of the proposed development would pro- vide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture and color that will remain aesthetically aopeal- ing_ and will retain a reasonably adequate level of maintenance. iJ — o� � icy Page 2 Review SECTION 2: Conditjcn, pf Approval : Site Plan and Design r"ollowin9rconditions andctheoattachedl is standarrdoved subJect conditiions: to the 1. The Developer shall comply with all conditions of approval of Tentative Tract No. 11549. 2. The Developer shall include provisions to accommo- date future front yard irrigation systems. As a minimum, such provisions shall include the installa- tion Of Schedule 40 PVC Dioe lnnne ... a A__.._ - arid sidewalks- �_�••• ••••••�� u. . VCWdys 3. The Developer shall submit a site plan and elevations for Lot 22 to be approved by the Design Review Com- mittee prior to issuance of a building permit for that lot. 4. C- C.& R. ' s, including maintenance of the equestrian trails, shall be prepared and submitted to the City for approval prior to recordation of the final map. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1981. PLANNING OM4ISSi0i1 OF TH CITI OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: /f U Je -A r y King/ Ch i rmanp - 7JJJ ATTEST�� Secreta y of ing Co,.;mi�,ion i, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted b the City of Rancho Cuc y the Planning Comrission of amonga, at a regular meeting of the Fia,ning COmmission held on the 28th day of October to-wi t: , 1981, by the fol7oo-;ing vote- AYES: C0 41ISSIC';EP,S: R �, e Dei , Sceranka , Dahl , Kinq NOES : COMIUSSIONERS: None ABSENT: COrVISSIONEP.S: Tolstov r .T v CI q ✓p. .�.� ✓"�c V o c L o c r✓ C C C V y [ V + q � 4r Nq •. JYY Y-_ qL ✓. G O C.•. - q _ O V --. � O � V 2 -� C _- = t] C•C 4 :n � G i ✓ O - =O S a.6 -- � C •J v C - _ -G - J ` O .n S O J- E C V L ¢ C � .• O V A r �-v O_ ~' N` .rJ. t - y1 �cr4` vn c V V a v C � E'-d.L w Y .Li. 0 7 4 ✓.`a o. d e c .Oi r V �c t p Y 4 c e � O L ¢f L`.� ` ✓.- POr � TO Gd C ` ✓ l0 _ OVr ` u \ Or CV 9a PL Yu j -..L L JY - C OY -� C✓✓` r .Li.� - L`aLwV «I ✓r y . L ¢N EV � J a .d.. C�OV p �G. 'VVUC ✓r✓ ✓. 7 ¢ YVr_ �aV� V� � n r qu � C p y r ySV TO qn u0 ✓ C ^q6 V- � T C� P.Ln r W J� VL - t Oar C' _ CCr•J-✓ - .� Oh ✓. � Gva� OL ll _ O r F c c G a n L � L T¢4 ➢ a L C O T- c u E Eq c am= _V 4 L O- T ] V E - C� N6 Gq ✓Of0 N Cw VO.� \ Z � S LIL �r✓ .pLl � N NS.-i �Oc� LL C=G LI -_ C _ m rVGrq >� CO L c _ O N N NI N N N -• ®' e tit C :� C = V ✓.` .n ✓ � C 4 � C O � ^-, � O O - {/] Exi - �� - M j r L Y E ✓6 9 O L O V¢ •r Y -i u € V C C 4 4 w 4 -2 o u V c :O ✓.` r ✓T h a m - �� as ��_ c y > rV l4 y Er G\.� O✓. .n J✓. O q O. F' VI _U V - Cr :O q .Y. C j.- r O D 4 'p ✓ G N - O 2� -Oq .'- W1 •I - do a a o-a oc o � p s. o � = O 0 QI i C C y d ✓ V V .J. u c L'' F O :a = c q r _E= r�' � � q cl a -•_ qn o .c.,= L ez cV .- .° L "_- ✓ V. O ZI J � qV --a L d rJ6 NO ��✓ 4 JT � Y q •wr r � �I � ��} .n =I CC G� ✓r O` � i �. ` aT O�� Gd ✓a � O'_ -`, a .�. 5 � �W'I >i T c a �� M� a'cd . ^ .. 'c roe^ o : 'J•J� «fir i« ate= ¢:; c (`, ° co ..G N T q � sc Wn � ✓c= ni r-' q " q Ms J4r _ ` =^r rcT ` c•� u ~I vi V L¢ ` qP rw C� i✓ 6r VUV -` OLG C•_-O ¢� j C= CrC VII •✓I M C VV h > V qa V rJV � L ` - - ✓ � J' �} .L. 4 gI �:•' Y cL.= �~ e E i c O -i � crl. �n q« v i c `= a` a< I+j _ r C � t 4? ✓. L �E O 4 _ .n 4- .r�t O G .. Y N O Nr 2N0 .lrr �O: 6V Cq LtL =` r _Pr CY=.. .a ✓ _ Sa V Gr G✓r 44J tOrw G✓p. rL.. V :o � O j ) � A V O - L.'- .r-- V ' A O O u L J V � � « - • t p y G. J c D- L ^ V •V O V S O P = = - I Q U u C 1n.«n O I 4 -= 0 O r O � _f �- r r 1 `� O V Li. •- 6 � 4 a S O. 1 4 _ _ y 4 - � C Iu C G D 60.r. n_ ^• T - , � qd C « L P Inu 1 u n � p_` , > r.:. ,.'y 9 G•. 0 C «u V I a > C _ 14 � C lul I •' A_ C� V^ V O ; ` A S C _ n -. -y y O •^ r i •'O y _ _ 4 r ^ O ? .n � a G.i O '_ � G 2) ... u C ^ = V•e L r� I�r « A_ _ O_ II« u V. r• �� _ « CAL OCC =; � ✓ _ C�_V _ G N - VGJ n V 4 C V-J u � �L� GO « O OI - O-a i ` _ CC ,,.• u >. =�7 j�rCv 1 _ W 1 c N _ .n -p V 7 «d A - L � C � G O V T( S u d «= _✓ 4 4 •O � C ' �G LVu «G a .d.. G•L..> LT nnp L •e C��« VL �- �� d O c d i� `^ •� _P « _ ~ C n� L Y_ L �A � •e G =2] r.� O G V �n 0... V a � v g y,3 Ot 1] J u >. cT O` •V « � O �A Nnv r PEA ^u LC poc t _ n _ � —.. G c � c:LL y..>. .cc— n � o u�_c _ _ c• � cu _ _c.`. �•«•o .,o` c u ' n P r > C V M y r` � O u G u n V r P ry .n y O A V .� « �T• 7��. P D u« � a p V4� N V nOL Prr9G C LL>i -•�' _ p rp V = V J__ ` GC C vim• _>r C O w C C O ti i C � CL W4VP�.O. O NTV « 4G.. O. Cc •�C.�L �' � )• � C ` � w I � I P V _ C 4 ✓ G p T l _C � V r C .n L C.Q - _ 7 =, ✓ C. P - _ q � N = ` r G r atli `� O ` C L O l I I • I V E �- O'i _ _ Y ✓ _ _ �. O' ut _ ri G I � u .� I I TSC ✓"• C57 ` �.� LL✓ VOCr_ VLL O� O- r ` C•tl Y L O V C 'J C+V _L O✓ O �- U ♦. �✓ u ✓ __' .� � _ C � C _ 0✓ i _ r C °A n_. O „ y_ 4 4 O y J ` _ M` .nG _ r D DGr � O vC � � M _ ✓ui M C o'7 L L; L .Ti ^ in ..9 6qL b n✓r' n` rY > 6._. r w. �✓CP WI � E ' i ~EY r �E •n` _ N U u - _ .n_ 4 7 V E ��.n C O d '�� U V -] W C _ 'J "J _ .n D [-._ _ Y C r = L G o r E `•O r r- Y ° C C• D C 1 V � E- ✓ nV � O`� a n _V �� `-U O G ��l' y )O -�_ C `. L •- L A G u ` .n 4 `. 4 L u N = i V O d G C.� q O C L O✓L Ca L .v v Q N O D w Y'1 � >• 1 C• � I 'J L p qq O d .nl O O G.n I 1Oi • V V 4 �I - e �C �I C •O I ¢ O r �I 1 d V r V _ - _ c �C V O � � � O � � • U✓y O_ � G P � �E C C C cam= .. _ .c - _ _ - _ _-_ _ _ >�•a __ sa GAS U�� U = bT = ✓ .w F SWd Nn � �_ _ GLCi r C C^ C Y �`_ _ �V= _cV-J4 uE_ L `9r y�r n J _ .° T4 C c• G _r - O C_L a_ G_✓ N^V V > 9 �- r,d ' V O r V Z L C C -4 _ a C O✓ O 3 ��° V V '� L N < �._ •` ` U Pp P L✓ O r O .,,. V � C N D .e j _ L..` C� ^ Q E �' 4- M ' _ .-'_c c EP5` - a +� P� Y- � J o_` `.No Y. O2 c _'• 9 ✓ C _. � A O J ✓ C A D P. � l S a C .n_ Y. a_". V V P` V ✓ r J � V V O � A ^VN _ V_ 2_ O _� - � C ✓Oa � r� U 21 1r a LO > OJ V -1 _ ✓ _ V ?Vrr O .. O. ._= V S Y LLN O - -"• < Ci .nf � v L _C ` C7 _.0 � u✓ .Gcoo-GE d<'�� .°cc c_I >`� o � bc a ✓n� = ,°�`„ ' c c = .°. u� �� _L v= "'?r o G _ � o`o .. G o4u J✓✓ o_ c c occ .. a � _ yo =- � � ✓ o_ _r..c' � o -� a T >.uv - a'.. o✓ oN "E` TC - _ _ � _ 4 = ".` c_ e Y _ _ C N C _C..n - _ d C .'r N N iJ 9 V J•J ^_ G C � L C_•. n 1C C 4 _ ><.. u � C _ V __ d= _ W _ ~ O - i_ C f--'�O E.p NOL� ooY � co _ _i � L o -_ GV o�u_d ou °• _ _ • 4 4✓ -�C C C _ C __ J ✓.. N , o o L+. N� E3E4uo cob vd P.� N c : So co. ' „4, � $ I _ e I � � -_ --_ � O t O O _ _ O I t ✓ V �� mm a rI- o °i I I o - Q -• G C a V J " _ 'z� � � o�G a .r. c u - ✓ Icy p I c . " o L• G c u L n l -_.� _ ✓ I « _ « t N.0 O T q I7-f 0 C� U r _ « « _ -i r V C a - « GI '" '. U 1 _O _�O C✓� O 7 _ q U y r'L = C•� j.� � ^'� d o - b ter_ ¢ c`.« � .o. �� h -.•-+ G - 1 I -_ c- _�� _ - __- � r � _ QCj ✓ a" a, r U` •� _ V y ✓ O P '. ��r1 V � .o- _C .'" V 6 V P C v c ✓. - I I + .•...^S - L O C w �'.= E o c C- c d = IV 1 I I i rn o c c L u- ✓ u b _ .. _ o m o u "ti .�. 11 `cam n� o=• o „ .E, a c`.+ �` G is N W I I G« c r 0 ^ 17` FO V 7 O • c - -5j t c U •�.�� C'r 4 � v -. O - O p _ _ � U 9 _ -• O c 1 __ _ « L 7 V •-..r CG _ _ - C I I I G C Mc� - i--tC t• C - _ Tc = = q G l M� � 1' .-..<- V � I- '-'�V C• c � �_ b �J •.J L 4 �.0. �� - V 4 V`- «✓ 92 ` � � _ _� rl a� E _ Imo`+ —'1 �^fu Gy ..' � _ =V =` G✓ -_ : �= ' ^� G q « C. C C •V 1__ II I) � q G l - « V V - -_ _T -r- -^ _ A• • � u� 1'v =r .u^ U >I ✓aG �� + IV•.: i f � V ...1. 0 ` Py ✓V CV f- ` �� '- 1 tl1 ^ m P VI ^ N ^ I `� � I _ � «V NL� p� NOO_ <V G� - u .r✓ CI MI m _ _v _.I 1. to 4 C y G L L 4 O n G �r G N J �� V> L�� sG` rt• ` Oi ,oV �O � UC 'J � G j` CG QI ` L RESOLUTION 140. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING THE TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 11549 WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension for the above-described project: pursuant to Section 1.501.83,.b) of Ordinance 28-8, the Subdivision Ordinance; and nclrm Cr�I ft.no, w.c P1ann11y l.N•n,u.os v.. w..u . � ,v..u. .) ur.p• O.c.: w.2 above-described tentative parcel map. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a time extension for: Tract ADDlicant Exairation 11549 Lewis May 5, 1985 SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has determined that the following conditions are the minimum conditions needed to make the project substantially in conformance with the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the applicant, Lewis Homes, has volutarily agreed to comply with them: 1. An additional five (5) feet of right-of-way dedication shall be made on Summit Avenue prior to recordation of the final map. 2. Front yard landszaping is required where houses face "Etiwanda Avenue pursuant to the Etiwanda Specific Plan. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan. shall be coordinated with the trail plan and submitted to the Planning Division for approval prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Local feeder trails and community trails, including Etiwanda and Summit, shall be provided in accordance with the Etiwanda Specific Plan and City s 4. tandards. A detailed equestrian trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, fencing and weed control, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Division prior to approval and recordation of the final tract map. 4. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size shall be required at an average of every 15 feet of loca'i street frontage in accordance with tl—_ Etiwanda Specific Plan. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to the Planning Division for approval prior to issuance of building permits. Resolution Page 2 5. Streetscape landscaping on Etiwanda, East and Summit shall be required in accordance with the Etiwanda Specific Tian . �, dziaiied landscape and 1r-, iOation plan shall be su:am `ted to the Planning Division for approval rrior to iss:.-_nce of building permits. APPROVED AND AnOPTED 7HIS 22nd DAY OF FEBrUARY, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF T9E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO,%A BY: Dennis L. Stoutt Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary or the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregcing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22rid day of February, 1994, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA CgCAA40 a , STAXP REPORT �0 i �I' z DATE: February 22, 1984 z yL TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd S. Hubbs, City Engineer ' 11y: Barbara Krall , Engineering Technician I I t1iR �FrT- ENVTUf1LrFyTl1 IICS_CCMFN A n PARCEL KIP 8303 - CNRiSTESON - A division ofr3.I acres int0 15 parcels In the General Commercial District (GC) located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Maven Avneue - APN 1077-401-01-03 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of parcel map. B. Purpose: To divide 13.1 acres into 15 parcels for development of the Virginia Dare Center on tonight's agenda as CUP 83-07. C. ?-ccation: The northeast corner of Foothill Blvd. and Haven Avenue. D. Existing Zoning: General Con nercial (CG) E. Existing Land Use: Site of abandnned winery. F. Surroundi2 Land Use: Nort - vacant South - ;scant East - vacant West - Deer Creek Channel The project bounds the exi�Ling General Telephone buil^ling. G. Surrounding General Plan and Development Cade Designations- North - Industrialpeci is a zn Area South -- Office Professional (OP) East - Terra Vista Planned Community West - Industrial Specific Plan Area. 1. _'ite Characteristics: This project is a former winery, portions of which have been designated as an historic landmark. Six buildings exist in deteriorating condition. ITEM C a ` PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Environmental Assessment ant' Parcel "3p 8303 - Christeson February 22, 1984 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: This map divides the site of the Virginia Dare Center into 15 lots. Three of these parcels are being used for common areas and prnvide for access e s es and ,park parking for all the parcels. An easement on the northerly property required to allow future circulation through this site and the site to the north. Widening on Haven Avenue will provide for two (2) left-turn lanes, thret (3) thru-traffic lanes and one (1) right-turn lane for southbound traffic at the intersection, of Haver. Avenue and Foothill 31vd. Deceler lanes Will ue constructed at entrances to the project on Foothill Slvd.e and Haven Avenue. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Also attached for ^ur review and consideration is Part I of the Initial Study as compiete.a by the applicant. Staff i..s completed Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Upon completion and review of the Initial Study and field investigation, Staff found no adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the proposed subdivision. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input and elements of the project. If, after such consideration, the Commission can support the recommended conditions of approval as written in the City Engineer's Report, then adoption of the attached reso'.ation would be appropriate. It is also recommended that a Negative Declaration be issued. Respectfully submritted, LBH:BK:ja'a V Attachments: flap - Tentative & Vicinity Resolutior City Engineer's Report Initial Study ` oZ ,Y;'rf 's +, i?,}�.t 2 ?}}: - � •t•- `t !r Ad j�. :. 9 t}i} Y ° ti `�' � }i>;�la }•, .. . � ". �F��:. iSi1 .li•��12 �+it I�r ••i � ,1 1' >t ;,. tyi'� 1„ 4�a + �• Tr' o ^ co a a q WCD �� O •Z _ ro dy y��i''f� _t• �- U1 III I11 rl rli ' rl I 1 I I 1 J �4Ly I I I I I I � I i r II ' I I : rill I �I i II 11 II : 1 I1 �11 3 I1 , I 1 I 1j Z t 11 y II { 11 Lj CITY OF RANCH,:) CUCA,ilONGA title; P.M. 303 ENG!NEERING DIVISION "�---�� VICINI?Y blAI' �T CITY OF RA-"CHO CJCA-MONrA i INITIAL STUDY i PART I — PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET — To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $80.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be cc mpleted and submitted to the Development r2 Jic:J Co—nunittee through the department where the Project application is ;Made. Upon receipt of this application, the Envircn-iental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public rieetirg at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1; The project will have no enviro-Lnental i-npact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Iripact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT.' TITLE: VIRGINIA DARE WINERY DEVELOPMENT APPLICP.R-T -S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Christeson Co. 17922 Fitch Avenue, Irvine, CA 92714 7714 8637 727 =`ILME, ADDRESS. TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING i 11S PROJECT: Rill Huatnn rhrictacnn r n 7922 Fitch Av rue Irvine CA 99714 (714) 863-1227 WCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR ?ARCEL NO. ) �4F? Fnr.thill Blvd 1077-401-1 and 3 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIO=L, STATE AIM FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SLTCH PERMITS: -ELGroadhm= Perri t - CF trans CUP - City of RAncho Cucamon a (approved) tncroachrent vem. it rl000 Controi PROJECT DESCRIPTION ISESC= =PTION OF PROJECT: Tentative Parcel Mac for office and business development AC EAGE OF PROJECT AREA A14D SQUARE FOCTAG� I � —_ PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF AVY: O EXISTING AND 12.1 acres. See approved Ct;P DESCRIBE THE £NVIRO'.1?N*raL SETTING OF TJ PII ETTF INCLULnNG INFiORIKATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PT.ANTS fT ANTmALS, ANY CTJLTURALSCENIC CE � REFS? . OF SURROUNDING PROPERTZ-SSTAINDC THE ODESCRIPII OF ANY USE EXISTI\U STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS; : Project slopes 2% in a sout!^,esterl direction. mostly covered with old grape vines, has a win row or eucai ;u us trees, no nown anima s or it s. Some exict`n^ buildings have historical value and tiTll remain see approved LUP). All surrounding properties are vacant. Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant env!--O? ientai iripact? lti WTLL THIS PROJECT: YES NO X 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? x _ 2. Create a substantial change in exis:invg :xoise or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services ;soli_e, fire avatar sewage, etc.)! X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? �_ 5= Remove any existing trees? How many? 100± X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of rotentially hazardous materia?s such as toxic substances, flarmables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: Eucalvotus trees are in the R/W when haven is aDnrrn o� ttiPv need to be removed. ' IMPORTANT: if the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I :iereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits pr-sent the data and information recrzired for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate •-xvaulation can be made by t Development Review Committee. i ^�) 0,1 Date February 10, 1984 signature Larry T omas Title Vice President M1.. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 8303 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 8303) LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND HAVEN AVENUE ti9 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 8303, submitted by Christeson Company and consisting of 15 parcels, located at the northwest corner of Foothill Blvd. end Haven Avenue being a division of a portion of Lot 20, Section L, Township 1 South, Range 7 west, --an Bernardino Meridian per Map of Cucamonga Fruit Lands as recorded in Book 4, Page 9; and WHEREAS, on November 30, 1983, a i=ormal application was submitted requesting review of the above-described Tentative Map; and WHEREAS, on February 22, 1984, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above-described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCTVMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That t: e following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement: of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4, That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental d. nage, pub is health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will rvt create significant adverse environmenta impacts and a Negative Declaration is issued on February 22, 1984. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 2303 is approved subject to the recommended Conditions of Approval pertaining .:hereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22NO DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA;+ONGA BY: _ Dennis L. Stout, Chairman +9: Resolution No. Page 2 ATTEST: K.icx Gomez, Deputy Secretary I , Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of P.archo Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regulariy introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plannina Commission held on the 22nd day of February, 1984, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Cur nF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REC0MMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL LOCATION: Northwest corner of Haven Avenue TENTATIVE PARCr MAP NO: 8303 anJ Foothill Blvd. DATE FILED: 11/30/83 LEGAL OLSCRIPTION: A l;ortion of Lot 20, NUMBER OF LOTS: 15 Section 2, Township 1 South Range 7 'west, GROSS ACREAGE: 13.1 w cco�nn An on. 1D77 Afrt lrt _:.''� San Bernardino M d U i d'' Ger i•idp Ui %ii%aTwr-u tiSJ�.cca Prv.a.M n: Fruit Land as recorded in Book4, Page 9 - xxxxxxx*xxxx*xxxxxxxx*xxxxxxxx,rtxxx�xxxxxxxxx,;:xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxt DEVELOPER OWNER ENGINEER/SURVEYOR Chris_ _teson CCompany same Hall and Foreman, Inc. 17922 Fitch _ 3186--L Airway Avenue Irvine, CA 92714 Irvine, CA 92714 Improvement and dedication requirements in accordance with Title 16 of the Municipal Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga inrlLde, but may not be limited tc, the following: Dedications and Vehicular Access 1. Dedications shall be mode of all interior street rights-of-way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. X 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the following streets: various additional feet on Haven as shown on tentative mo;• I) additional feet on Footni B vd. additional feet on X 3. Corner property line radius will be required per City Standards. 24 foot radius at intersection of Foothill Blvd, and Haven Ave. X 4. All rights of vehicular ingress and egress shall be dedicated except for one (1) 40-foot opening on Haven Ave. and two (2) 40-foot openinss or. Foothill Blvd. X 5. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements e.isuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all common roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by C.C.&R.s and shall be recorded concurrent with the map. -1- X 6. All existing easements lying within future right-or-way are to be quitclaimed or delineated on the map per City Engineer's requirements. y. Easements for sidewalk for public use shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. Surety X I. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements prior to raco-.i,Mq Dui, all parcels. 2. A lien agreement must be executed prior tc reccrdino of the map for the following: median island on Foothil ; Blvd. X 3. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed, guaranteeing completion of all on-situ drainage facilites n--cessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Divison prior to issuance of building permit for each Parcel . Street Improvements ursuant to the City of Ranch Cucamonga Municipal Lode, Title 16, Section 16.36.120, the subdivider may enter into an agreement and post security with the City guaranteeing the required construction prior to recordation of the map and/or building permit issuance. 1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, Parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. 2. A minimum of 26-foot wide pavement within a 40-foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be constructed for all half- section streets. X 3. Construct the following missing impru"ements: Prior to recordation for all parcels Curb I A.C. i F-- DrivelStreet Street A.L. Meaiani Street Name Gutter Pvmt. Walk Appr. Trees Lights Overlay Island* Other Haven I X X X X X X X X Foothill X X X X X X I X lien *Includes landscaping and irrigation or meter -2- X 4. Prior to any work being performed in the public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be ottai-ned from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. X 5. Street improvement plans shall be prepared ty a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuar;.e of an encroachment permit. X 6. Developer shall c3ordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. X 7. Existing lin: > of 12KV or less fronting the property shall be undergrourded, X S. install appropriate street name signs, traffic control signs. striping and m-7rkings with locations and types approved by the City Engineer. X 9. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Lights shall be on decorative poles with underground se,vice. X 10. Landscape and Irrigation plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division p -ior to the issuance cf building permit. X 11. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Undersidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards. Drainage and Flood Control X 1. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be rE -.ired and shall be delineated or noticed on the final map. 2. A(,E ;u-,ta provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal oT s: •f ace drainage entering the property from ad3acent areas. 3. The following stirm drain shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer X 4. Prior to recordation of the map, a hydrologic and drainage study for 'he project shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review. 5. A drainage detention basin per City Standards shall be constructed to detain increased runoff fe -3- Grading •X 1- Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Buildiny Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be it substantial confcrmance with the approved conceptual grading plan. x �• A spiis report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to Pei-form such work prior I o issuance of building permit. 3• A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified enaireer or geologist and submitted at the time of applicat-on or grading plan check. 4. Tho final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Grading Committee and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of buildingpermit whichever p comes first. 5• Final grading plans for each parcel are to oe submitted to the Building and Safety Dig; :sion for approval P- 101 to issuance of building permit. General Requirements and Approvals X 1. Permits from ether agencies will be r2q,lired as *cllcws: r, Cal Trans fo Foothill, Blvo. x San Bernardino ounty . coa Cont. o D7 zstrict x Cucamonga County Water District for sewer and water x San Bernardino County Dust Abatement (required prior to issuance of a grading permit) Other X _ 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictio^s (C.C.&R.s'r approved by the City =ttorney is required prior tc recordatioo of the Tap. X 3. provide all utility services to each lot including sewerage, wate electric power, gas and telephone p"ior to street constructon. y 4. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall to designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. X 5. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CalTrans and San Bernardino County Flood Control District. X 6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of tie final map will be subject any requirements ti.-t may be received from them. -4- X 7. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does net auarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. When building permits are requested, the CucamongZ County Water District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. 8. Local and Master Planned Trails shall be provided in accordance with the Trail Plan. A detailed trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing and weed control., in accordance with City trail standards, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to recordation for and/or prior to buiiding permit issuance for 9. Prior to recording, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment DisLrict 82-1 ariong the newly created parcels. X 10. At the time of final i-,,�-p submittal, the following shall be submitted: Title Report, traverse calculations (sheets), copies of recordea maps and deeds used as reference and/or showing original land division., tie notes and bench marks referenced. X 11. Surplus Flood Control right-of-wzy along the west boundary as ® shown on the site Dian shall be acquired and merged with parcel map. X 12. An easement to reserve access to the northerly property shall be recorded at the time of recordation of the parcel map. X 13. Traffic signal --el:-:ation, if required, shall be completed by the developer and coordinated with Cal?rans. X 14. Right-of-wa•.• width on Haven Avenue shall provide for two (2) left-turns lanes, three (3) thru-traffic lanes and one (1) right-turn lane for scuthbound traffic. X 15. The proposed storm drain in Foothill Blvd. shall be extended to provide a catch basin at the east end of the proposed westerly driveway. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LLOYD B. HUBBS, CITY ENGINEER Ankh by:. -5- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ��canrob STAFF REPORT r, I I III ! rli Iz IZ t DATE: February 22, 1984 197 I TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Co-.;mission FRO14: Rick Gomez, City Planner i BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner t SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83-07 - CHRISTESON - The development of Phase I of the Virginia Dare Winery l Business Center, consisting of office, banking and restaurant uses comprising 2 buildings and a theme tower on 13.1 acres of land in the General Commercial district located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue - APN 1077-401-01 and 03. I. BACKGROUND: The developer is requesting design approval of the site plan and elevations for Phase I of the Virginia Dare Winery Business Center as shown in the attached exhibits. The concept/master plan project was originally approved by the Planning Commission on June 8, 1983. Pursuant to the conditions of approval for the conceptual master site plan, the applicant has submitted specific development plans for the two buildings and theme tower located on t',e corner of Foothill and Haven. II . ANALYSIS: A. General : The Phase I development plans have been designed in accordance with the approved design concept as shown in the attached Exhibits. The Grading Cotscnittee has reviewed and approved the conceptual grading plan. Construction of Phase I will include the interior loop driveway and parking for 112 vehicles. B. Design Review Committee: The Committee has reviewed the Phase I Development Pans and recommends approval of the site plan and elevations subject to incorporation of arched windows and scalloped gable roof ends and the use of subdued colors for the individual metal sign cannisters and Sion copy face. The appplicant has provided revised elevations to address the Committee's concerns as shown in Exhibits "E & F". Building material samples for the exterior finishes will be available at the hearing. ITEM D Planning Commission Staff Report CUP 83-07/Christeson February 22, 1984 Page 2 C. Historic Preservation Commission: As a designated 'historic landmark, this project requires review by the Historic + Preservation Co=ission pursuant to Ordinance 70. Demolition or alteration of structures designated as historic landmarks requires approval of an alteration permit by the Historic Preservation Commission. The Historic Preservation Commission reviewed the Phase I development plans on January 5, 1984 and reco=ended approval of the conceptual design. The apalicart intends to proceed with demolition of only non-histor y landmark buildings and frundations in the near feture. D. Environmental Review: The Planning Corunission issued a Negative Declaration for this project or. June 8, 1983. No further action is required. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the Development Code and General Plan. The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause siq_nificant environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use and building design, together with the recommended conditions, are in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Development Code. Iv. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all material and input on this project. If after such consideration the Commission can support the facts for findings and conditions of approval , adoption of the attached Resolution would be appropriate. Res ectfully ubmitted, Rik ome C}fty Planner RG:DC:ns Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "3" - Site Photogra,-r,s Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Lardscuo, Plan Exhibit "E" - Elevations Exhibit "F" - Elevations Resolution of Approval for CUP 83-07 Resolution of Approval for Phase I with Conditions �■■ �'�- " � M - 1 ' vAaa■A■u■a IIU■■\f u■n■■■ :d�■I�IpI �a■ama -- �� A ■�aA,nua■mn •� '� .� �i■�nnnuua � R V�- y �q �aaw aaauu LLJ N M Aa■Y ZI IH NORTH CITY aaau A ■ K ' .'.f' .. • t IONGAI TITLE CA rk - / PLANNING DIVEONT t'/i l - y. L, .rn 1 A .j lam• k � I � 1 i �� tr 'ten. _ _ y .•: i. • f ' l j I 1 1 .I i lTli 7 � Irl !7 i11111Ill . Mi ' II III ',Il i !ii I j 4 ' 11111 ' II1111111 I I ! !?JI � 1 1 i r t � i iq _y. 6 w it i �n�w.wr I _ ♦ e e -�-------- ��. i007H1L 8YG I eLv� 1l•A tJ. I °kiP4�t I .AREA m au�s�•m � �a� SnE aau NORTH .� CITY OF ITEM: . 1 RAINCHO CUCA2 IONG '� TITLE: -re ftA�'y - PL1,NNi I\G DIXISON EXIiIBIT= G SCALE: 1 i l�1 1;,-yyI I1111 - ., II • I �i �II . :I � ' I I '�� P� �Illilllll , l _ IIII ' I a I Ili 11i1 Iltli� - � . � t I PHASE I AREA `ram j NNEN NE bl7 l .cTOm NORTH CITY OF ITEM: �� •O� RANCHO Ct.CNXIONGc� TITLE — LA !kAO PLANNING DIN ISUNT EXI ERIT:�_ALE: +"" F 4 r . 1 J x��: �-7�1F - _• �y w> tLX•^ ��, � •gif .rr. J If K r�l � •�.•:I6 _ r K�a♦ +s A � • • _ I - ."• Mgt' - +�,'• tea• r ,,r , �N. i i tei 1 '� i.' Li• 1 ��i i •, . r Y ti• 1 .: � / j r t f. a r n n •r 1 RESOLUTION NO. 83-79 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIOWAL USE PERMIT NO. 83-07 FOR 13.1 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL AND HAVEN IN THE A-1 ZONE (C-2 PENDING) WHEREAS, on the 7th day of April , 1983, a complete application was filed by Christeson Investment Co. for review cf the above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 8th day of June, 1993, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above-described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, and the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed; and 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions ® applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 3. That the proposed use will compiv with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issues: on June 8, 1983. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 83-07 is approved subject to the following conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. This project includes structures designated as historic landmarks. Approval rf the change of use, construction, demolition, relocation, or material chance pursuant to Ordinance 70, Historic Preservation, shall be obtained prior to issuance of any building or demolition permit. 2. No demolition permit shall be issued for structures designated a historic landmarks, unless a building permit is concurrently issued. MW 1 Resolution No. 83-79 Page 2 3. That this approval is conceptual approval only and does not constitute approval of any specific designs. Specific Eite plan and elevation. shall be required for each prase of the project. 4. A consistent architectural theme, incorporating the mission style architecture associated with the historic Garrett W;nery shall be utilized throughout the entire project. 5. All project entrances on Foothill Boulevard and Haven Ave ae shall, be designed with a special textured ' eatment, such as stamped concrete. In addition, a textured treatment shall be used in the pedestrian walkway underneath the arbor that runs through the site. 6. The use of Deer Creek Channel right-of-way shall not interfere with or obstruct the use of said right-of-way for regional trail purposes. Written approval from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District for the use of Deer Creek Channel right-ef-way for parking and landscaping shall be submitted prior to issuance of grading or buildinc, permits. Failure to receive approval will require submittal of a revised site plan. 7. The arbors shall be planted with vines, and creeping varieties of vines or ivy shall b-- utilized against wall surfaces throughout the project reminiscent of the original winery. 8. A parcel map or lot merger shall be recorded prior to issuance of building permits. 9. Additional landscape planter fingers shall be provided throughout the parking areas, approximately every seven stalls, to provide a tree canopy for shade. 10. The Site Plan shall be revised to indicate a may-imum one (11 ) foot car overhang into planter areas, which would result in a curb-to-curb dimension of 62 feet on a double-loaded two-way aisle. 11. The one-way access road located at southeast corner of the project shall be screened with a combination of berming and landscaping. A vine covered arbor may be required if this functions as a bank drive-thru facility. 0-! O Resolution No. 33-79 Page 3 12. Revised Site ?'an shall be submitted indicating retention of the full 30-foot Regional Trail and a minimum 5 feet of landscaping between the Channel and the parking areas prior to issuance of grading or building permits. ENGINEERING DIVISION 13. Driveways on Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue shall be provided with deceleration lanes. 14. A lien agreement shall be executed for the future construction of the n fl median island. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF��JUNE, 1983. PLANNING CC-MMISSIONr 0 J 'E�CITY OF RANCHO ;;UCAMONGA BY 'Herman Rempel , C airman ® ATTEST\ I •4 I /� ��'{ �� Secretary or the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 3th day of June, 1983, by the following vote-to-wit.: AYES- COMMISSIONERS: STOUT, BARKER, JUAREZ, MCNIEL, REMPEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - Tom _ 99 _ d Or rTO� _ q 96 T9r�f TC � a'� ri •Ln �DCO C L� C4 .� G4 N� � 4 - - __ ,Leo c _ 9: cda o r V — c rCc c• n . cd OL 9p � � O n.emu _- Gd0 d Q N j r O C n J CU U .OeS d .a 6 .L+I9� N q O d N O OV p p L •�... P�L Pl V V u „ Gy T L n y=N l �r v C V q C on _ c� .•cw• rn c � > c a r_ we _ OWO ~L VLq =q-u O.TG Yd 60U r SJ N O NV � 6 � LLn • -•_ O �VJi t =`n L p l f rn C , L l l 0 `i N S u C V y r9 r u .Ci y Va 7�n NQOG �JuO � F 9'•O ` 2 VO E: d` _ 9yVVga~ Vv C V O y_ NN V �9 qo_ e ' G o — .�9r 9 6 O 'J V 7 „ •[ O `Y i P > V 9 _ V u d C d L y �, �•t• W Q C pi L p p Qv4L6 6NpD 6 -/�m 6D rG-• •"• p rL MO N �a 10 4V 9 d�O P O _ T O L � 7 L• S C ^D ' q 0 Y Q r O O ^D u 6 9 Gu L ^b x vrr d � o cn —cr ill 3 CSG G �� f ]+y �- _ •Q. G EO n N L O E F L rr L v C�` E a ^1 q^ 'Cm V V C 6 S U O I J V I y P n V N L V C .0 J J a V L C d^ �I rna N_ n e �M o1 oN G 2 N ��'�1 I p l C F V P 4 _w d C ^ > O ` 6 0�9 d C .r0•CV a,C 0.'� Cl 9C _ ON Py�� L9 .• •_ Y' C W � _ GN' c a6 �qf CO •^ NOj � VV!! C n LV y Cur -ry d6 V 5 V M G C-^i V V C A O O F� d 3 G b � •J^ 9 h G G' u• NI U p O �a V L.. L it � � O � 6 N^ O U 6 0 9 m •• Z - EErI �O F i 1\\ • a m Ja rI •I i ^I N�\�I �I �I I i yW L�. T✓.r V N - ✓ P 'T - nT�: o r a' `Y" 'r ro ` �✓ _r _ L N __ n ` nrr = �r O u p T c p n C r= c c V� n O �u�.- ma c✓ fi .L. D c O u - p OLGN - r p N u L C�✓__� ✓ C v C 6 u V /J L N C O 0.g n N '^ C� N b V u U.O.r b� F. d^Q N V�O O C C a S N r0. = U -'L_ = P✓ d a 7 6 2i u � �L r �0 p 6 L V C. n E T O u ✓ C= V N w.. 4 T 9 ✓ -� � C n S� r L P n O d_N V pL „J lu ` O OCgC Ull_ OV dLP N Cu wurN L_ N 9lT ANC L L N C� n-• U O 1 p C Y C n L n 9 ~> L✓L 6 C 9 O U O d P O - ..O u q-J N n N V n d� q C L Pr tea- N =c N rE _ _ u � n ."�" c ✓._ r_•- -v n � c e �y n r N co �� L .�. L= _✓ ."-?_� wmn Pa o 4 O- r C C-U b C >v u C Irb r- �� Ob O.gnu-.70 >L9_ ai r.._U ✓O L NV On� C NF✓ Od 6- Vn4Q INLN <�- rr NL } LOr.. 6�-r < <O rLN- n � ( .Lnpn W6N00.3 � q 91 A �I W a L c V r _ r j c � M � b r ,p N LV ✓ Vr- r e n 4'i.nVO d U O .a P0. 0. u 6V.6.. 9CLb�� 0.N ✓ yn9� 0 •"•�'u0 r O � Y .n r E Od- � VV O-uL q�0� 0. C C c� � O � V C V q C !] N L N ✓ � �r b 0.� V r -J ,O �t OT C � LL L nw.'n u `t'J Nr E� Spi w ✓,. � L .,:o ` N Ln c awL v ap L w N4 CnC O d 6 � N7 y L✓ P CU O � > O� V��✓ � 0 2 OCC O .Li. 9VCV = MCcU y�rlG� .r C�=-L �� 4c vacr - u�� o - ? .ri F cc r O � r r c c u Q_ N G O i a 'c M E .-c 4 f o✓��r �u L� VU. 2 Y✓ C V � CNEM GO��-L6 V _ .� qC- C_ V tJOC� Ny c c EO1- r c4 - r_ 9VVNW Nc N C_C' N .Y VJ rnnc"J V MO� OCP ^ OTJ � EOC d�Ny � J �C q O C C O n N� .r > C� f✓ O 0.�u�� O_ C L C C G n d W - � 2 `'' a V L u L .n T .- N� 0.'✓u ;�- .Nw.e 0' -3 c EL N 1 .p m P1 I l'J JI I rnI 4I rI I ^I I 1 O- r -Ui � W fv .S a •� C L 9 1 N V y r q ;S -+ O O. � ' T V y� 7ry V �7� N n u C F' q y C ^Fb r O.• 2 G V � r N � i L 4� d V -J t � O q 1 JL. •--• 0 0 L � M N � � � q Y .-= t � V V p r -_ � }� qO - 9y U_ r •JO L C � Y_O O 6 N V C-. V P •n O, q S=C u ` Eon Nob a NI c 00 T� aGL.• rN �Oo V �VST ` �toi O�nO y=:: i� �I LL y C E .-2 _ V /1 qL nL G6m G qj O Gq r• 6Wr � 6Or 6 C� n rI G' - \I en V ,�O �i -- - � _ oc Ly.L ^ �_' qV ^ _ L- r yN O �y� NV C 'p • v r ." JrN Qu VC L re Qq G Or-J_ C J 6•"' 7 q T n N N Y-• 7- V 7 y y ti j q �i N' O y - gQ `VO j06 V_ PG Nq q�4Y O' W C-V _ L_ iPO L?C CT •�- p _LN - M Qom.(2 � V � d -j •- � VL, o -- oo cam = q o 'sy ro 3 • _` O ter- � �.. %a L - ^, v_ -J-� - ' .n4 ^v `C � U PZ O O 7 U__ _ _ '_J j U _ �• q � p� d - < y V, = .«,. Av < �— <� ¢�.. 2•l+ . J < q- cd ¢ °v �a.o. _ mot .non sib'..°. <— � Lt= P ' T P d_ O � P L^J A I-. L O✓ V� V �_ _ _P O N _ 1 D O q G Y � A L � •J O r L 1^ r O q O - C(��J � LL' qr GJ d ✓ qu lr ✓ Vv� _ J +� ✓ 711 .I x_ - o I a✓� \Jv nJo V P r. G > Sw q 7 O _ CL C• O V d q 2 q O 7 C C G V O V 9 O _ G—i� TJ N� G✓ � � qNr ` -Vi L� GAY ��7r C V E C T �� V✓ � G L 6✓ O O G �� VL W00 � GV�d LL En✓_ Or du. E OLNdLr u •E'J L O✓ �n O v D r O i t� '1 d G vOj q 9�. C _ CQ L ➢ S 0.G y O p y N 7✓ C r L _ O Zi �n 9 L0. � cj 6r C✓ •a'• O NO✓ ,� 7✓� aNk ' .J. =V •n� VI ,y YLG'-J� 6i rC LU L' CO G O LGP^ - � rn0 l _ qq6 1 �w9 = ✓iq O` � O CC •nOG � O G •nOv l r� r• _ P d O V g G q C O T d N T 6 0 �C V✓N J � U r V O�' G P >, C q Qw •n N > d NY. O�� ` c qD q NV�JN C4A0 OG— t— L •r Oya COV VO Pq OI Yq ii ul ✓ \f/ c\ -> -r` Cy— Pr 1 O L U— O n P d PN f✓j�_ O V C 9 C r L L i•r �� p � r _ u r '_ � �J Oi a_ O O C d 7 .a i..r V q •„ q= C 1' � -ra Q 7 � = L u- "i-_ moo J ✓ n W c �� _ _ ��_ c LVG CV O� v 'e rJt J[ VC nJ � =C O_ 9 w yY ✓ c 0 � P N �L`V G Pr ~ O > v 7 7 N _ dq O✓✓"' O.n �r O 0.` 00. C� LL_ i • N PV 2 NO _ _ q�O•r ✓ V � q� V06 ` V= r � Lu 'TO GV aj - F' q m o L U c3q rra � q i�q� ^ r m.� Nt un N96 aJc `� ✓v Y = m c��_ � � jy E� �� Lu nL c O L lOJ p; c O a=dj ma y _.? c o U - D q C d --' O >•C_ � Nc .> G� _Y= p0 r �� :•` < mi _ _ P-' P-O+ o .>. rnE .�J ._-'ter c� 9 _ _ - � � L c � -� =" - �__ PJ. cow✓ icy __ .J, n: = o`. -L >'_ - ` rJ� _ -• _ .9 �'i ce a= 4� -. _ .' L -` _' f- "JL L c - ` .. c =' .' r. `' oaq. � •= c � +✓ Y 'c-'_ c L - �S L•rN O. NI O� 6 > 0.n.iu✓• S- -f�.1 Ni dVL rw0 0..OJ G JD41P /i O� NI I I �� 1 u� •l � / ^I 1 01 ID_ I J • C 7 V L r �/ � = �''I t �i c✓v` _ T _ o is N qL -c�= � - .- � rr _ �a__� Vim•^ uP cN¢.�� .- o . yl: ` N�- t N O Y L ✓ G I O C U O q✓ x �'� � O b V 1•'• O P.i 1 P InN WL- c DC6G Gm Tq Pi• O -_ � .2 G. �.. q6L �DNOO .a✓� � NC P VO9P T� LN y S I i I q .- ✓_ V , • N L 0 N J- O ! Ll 6 G V N L V V 3 6 O C d Le e.. aN or x✓ r O .Go � O N ✓U_ -J V d 1 c u �� •� co D ea. u c =� N ir,. T I � d 9� N G �_d .O ✓ 0 C O el N d if Pa I u NET' Te� o o— iu Ma o uG rr o} 1 YY••.. , - a V��VVVI b V bO6 G� �r Nb r•O Y_ Zq E p 0 LI iIJ T L_ N 7 n C G P_ 4:' b j Qj -. _ �Z,d Nto D ' i co _ a o�.L Gc u iV _t WgIq III q �O � OOL ^n V✓ NV CG NN V .. C N tri { ' 6 O� �Cp ' G... �� 1 q � � C N �i � P M'm �✓ -✓ =77'7 yi ✓V O� O O V r J �: Y V Vim: 9 4 G a � �✓ r E Z Wu G 57 •• T Y O OV -� G � q �•9y p C ✓ r V Q O- C- F� � O � _�• O y u i ✓ 4 c_ p G =V J M CO J v C o d C t L 4 C MN L' L =I y ti •ia- -• d- c_ c 'I -v •' _ c �v •�- � _ V T L p a y ul N g t L G L dn ' Ode CVO LU O7 ^L G C N 6�• M � u 6 R p L✓V S] 6' o. - ✓ o i i�r � d o� a 9u z••= -Ti I L a YY c Y r � -p c S r 9 i•� 9 � I d � a N u V✓ n I n 7 T •Ui N `6 0 � — � I ✓ � O �4 C � Y y — �P •j L J O d� �' � L I I ` Y� V t y P ` I `•C� r u •7 O N Y 9 �u .Pi 2� V o_ j E pM t _ _ I I v r✓� O •_J�l G_ r I _`_ '' �•J L= ` n— = N I I u Z V 9 pV N � � I] u N = I — = ' G ✓ — p .�.� C C � i . O'er � i � M1 u N rl G •n � � C C� � V C � .i� i.� � � P"� V p = a Vi � n O �• � ^_ C =n •�� I�U� S = I I I V C � v •i J V V 'n 1 .ter I � O � _ � LuC I` Y ' Cu I Chu V P Y vY 1 _ N _ •- � ' J •i w � r �r 11 _ O _ r 1 —C I < 6 N ✓ i I+r' L [— I 1 R r p l <— � O O J nI NI • dl _ N \ V i• � � tJ a =I �I I I �i a L 0 ` j7 RESOLUTION NO. 83-79A A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING SITE PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW FOR. PHASE I OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83-07, LOCATED ON THE: NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL AND HAVEN IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. WHEREAS, on the 5th day of January, 1984, a complete application was filed by the Christeson Development Company, applicant for the above-described project; and WHEREAS, the Design Review, Developnent Review and Grading Committees have recommended approval of said project, with appropriate conditions. NOW, THEREFIRE, trq City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: Findings: 1. The design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with the applicable elements of the City's General Plan and any adopted architectural criteria for specialized area, such as designated historic districts, theme areas, boulevards, or ® planned developments. 2. The design and layout of the proposed development will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. 3. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by this Ordinance and the General Plan of the City. 4. The design of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture and color that will remain aesthetically appealing and will retain a reasonably adequate level of maintenance. SECTION 2: Conditions of Approval : Site Plan and Design Review for Phase I of CUP 83-07 is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. All conditions of approval contained in Planning Commission Resolution 83-79 shall apply. 2. Phase I construction shall include a parking lot for at least 112 parking spaces. 3. A unI -orm sign program for this development shall be submitted to the Planning Division for their review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Ail composition roofing shall he variable thick-cut architectural style. A sample shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 5. The exterior stucco paint color shall be a lighter tan color, consistent with the historic character of the existing buildings. A sample shalt be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Staut, Chairman, ATTEST: EST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Ric!: Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commissio on the 22nd day of February, 1984, by the following vote-to-wit; n held AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Y CITY OF RANCHO CUCATNIONGA ��CA.VO V STAFF REPORT �9- 1 ci to Qj z U, 1> DATE: February 2Z, 1934 t97 �) TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission i FROt4: RicY, Gomez, City Planner 3 tUrt 00hriSt0h, ASSOCidi.e Planner i SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83-17 - 84 LUMBER - A revision to a previously approved CUP for the development of a 31,200 sq. ft building for 84 Lum,ier on 2.55 acres of land in the industrial Park category (.iubarea 6), located on the west side of Haven Avenue, south of 8th Street - APN , 209-251-05. 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Revisions: This project was originally approved in December 933 with access from the south off of a MWD easement located within the future extension of Acacia Street. The applicant, 84 Development, was unable to obtain the right to use the MWD easement from the underlying property owner, so the site plan was revised to provide temporary access on Haven. When Acacia Street is constructed, the temporary drive is to be removed and a new driveway constructed in the originally approved location. Other revisions to the plans include a 15—foot offer of dedication along the west property line, a new emergency access lane location, and additional parking spaces at the north end f of the site. Also, slight changes to the elevations are proposed to reduce the size of the front patio and remove the fiberglass panels on a portion of the east elevation. The proposed changes are minor in nature and do not adversely affect the design of the building. The 15-foot offer of dedication along the west property line will be used for a road to connect 8th Street to Acacia and Haven when the underpass is constructed. Recommended Conditions of Approval require the applicant to provide a lien agreement for the construction of a portion of Acacia Street along the south and west project boundaries, and removal of the Haven Avenue driveway. In addition, 25 feet of landscaping, from the west building elevation, to the future curb, must be installed with the proposed road. To accommodate this landscaping, the aisleway shown along the west elevation of the building will be removed and a driveway from Acacia Street will provide access to the loading area on the south side of the storage building. 3; 1TE74 E .fr � Planning Commission Staff Report CUP 83-17/84 Lumber February 22, 1984 2 II. ANALYSIS: A. General : The revised site plan, as seen on Exhibit "A", shows the temporary driveway location at the north end of the site. The applicant, however, prefers a more southerly location exhibit 9"), so the driveway is visible from the manager's office for security purposes (see attached letter) . Considering the Haven Avenue driveways are temporary, Staff fee-is the northerly location has the least impact on the project. The southerly drive fragments the landscaping along the street frontage and creates a large expanse of pavement in front of the building. However, the northerly driveway maintains the quality of the streetscape and provides better on-site circulation for delivery trucks. In addition, the ultimate removal of the northerly drive approach is assured because a steep slope down to the street will exist when the ailroad underpass is constructed. Revised conditions of approval are provided on Resolution 83-141A. Also provided is the original Resolution with conditions, original staff report, and minutes from the December 14 Commission Meeting at which the project was approved. III. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a Public Hearing in the Daily Report Newspaper and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. IV. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to consider public input in elements of this project. if after such consideration the Commission concurs with the recommended conditions of approval , adoption of the attached resolution would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, Rick Gomez. City Planner RG:CJ:ns Planni:g Commission Staf" Report CUP 83-17/84 Lumber February 22, 1984 3 Attachments: Exh-*Jbit "A" - Proposed Site Plan Exhibit "B" - Alternate Driveway Location Exhibit "C" - Revised Building Elevations Letter from Applicant Staff Report - December 14, 1S3' Planning Commission Minutes - December 14, 1983 Oriainal Resolution of A.00rovai Revised Resolution with Conditions � -3 _ '' 9aR8iIJIE ,: .r v j �6'c.el., u•`•c r�+aa •a + Pw»i�sf.+l .t. a 'J �,is i °' i 1 k v � � ! •� i , 171 er ul .71 It �c � �� i , •� i izlb � �Ky a rtonce -.. , >: • �Vl_t L�•y 3•f:w_V G5L �_:<�yl.T+1 aS. fKT �4 4L m� � •—�� _ 1 1 • '\ }�i�. � _ ' .._ 1�� iZ � �S•.�'. i1 IY.O�. t•J.'LJCG S ' ._y . .J t y --T Y_T CUT'=_9��L'L..'Y_Nf _� -�f'— �_ROf.T.✓'„YYC•[��]...0 1.:Gi�;.�� .f• r�r�t:x:v A�,.':LJ— .�.�—c.�l c�T,�.'e✓..�.�:.� �,.6 yew "C :.�D:p•!, i1a1.p' �.J..�... . 3�,��\.. CITY OF ITE\I: !/P83- 17 RA�'CHO C UCAN'IONGIA, TITLE: �M F- W +✓�Na.�1 WE PLANNING Dl"vr .N 8,4 SCALE- N �1 ,y J IPA ;' 1 � NEy7" • S i_ � ter.. c^``i -. ,� � `� � \� wa L•(a+aly uvc TCJIGC 'a � � %4X-c.�,«� 1+�` � Q4�4� 1y 1� - = � r— —•— Si -i 1 _- y _ V-ii 1 s p KiIj �a —J'� � G'� � 1� 1 ♦ t ,pp I 9z ul 1. p LAIJfS' �i G/L['1 • :,� •., ICJ I y1-Li CCC� 11 / . 1 � ��.•.I� art I' �ju¢i�c�c+a - - •�a r-ue.c ou+cL � � .1 ` � � ,.� "�. _ 1� ., � .-. 7 �:: '; vc x...c 7 t'.,ul..o�w. x+v+�.c �ItS.n!s tx c.Rs '+��s.��, 1 1 � ,• it JAIL ? �• -�. _ _ —_1..L".�i'SL� 305']0_- --uau2- ' - .j '1'�-j ' TRY v" �_¢lra�.o cs'•avert _E'F.ji v�Ev ?•Gt+Lt�- S��c.�`a�Et.�..::l.a �u: i3.Lr Z t•f,_6a kr o.,,J; . ;`3- ' 3 � i..t CITY OF ITF��I: GL'YE3- /7 IV RANCHO C;I_ CAN IO\'GA TITLE- s. Z: Lcl, i SG1LE- FLkNNI\G DIR-15IC�N EX�3IBIT: •��`r— i v "� �=`" " —....r�.e�� .� .vyi,—,s,,ti _Y , � i ilE:E"w^'✓KSi'F�.tiL'_�i tI1'n � 7;-*n' r Ti�l I I i it•I � fill !�1'P' I .� . { �:I ! Ib � i' . I "'I''Iri ' II �r''? !I �''I !,(,RIB,IIL,1!LIL:II,.,!.I�f';,1 .,:��'.,LII �„lilllll.,rirr,,,li. I,� ,, .• + , . I ,i Irl. _ I !�i Inl�tl d,ud.,,JI. I� 1!�r..u...r•r,.i , Ir.,I•'rli!iill!Iluu,7.nnn.hl < I++I I � i I I J _l lu ' III tr . fZOACYLAW �o+rTtl ELEUr� TIcIV L�QA71c f=El�17C�vi - It-1�7ZE J n_ ..mot•- _ �':.�� Tr?_r- - rJ yl ------------ 6 tir/rM1 -N I � — /�!G]�IH EGEL%i/1�%N CI'aTY OF �/ T { 1Tt.Ni= G �A t �3 -.17 R T CHO E�I.TCA'iYiO\T,.A TITLE- h�-w F_ / cr/ er xfA PLANNING DIVLSOON EXHIBIT: SCALE- -- 'OE' � DEVELOPMENT COMPANY _ 200 Route 51 J Eighty Four, PA 1 5330 41 2-223-8400 February 8, 1981a City of Rancho Cucamonga Chairman and Members of Planning Commission Jb� t 9320 Baseline Road P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 7�g� �i�!li!L1112!�1�sol6 RE: Proposed 84 Lumber Company Facility Haven Avenue Dear Chairman and McL.bers: The entrance for the above referenced project cannot, at this time or until Acacia Street is extended to the west of Haven Avenue, be built in the location shown on the plans you approved at your meeting of December 14, 1983. Accordingly, revised plans showing the location of a "temporary" entrance (constructed to all city specifications) and related site modifications are enclosed herein. Curt Johnston of the Planning Department has indicated that he felt that the temporary entrance should be placed toward the north end of the property, primarily so as not to interrupt the landscaping screen along the front of the property adjacent to Haven Avenue_ Four sets of drawings snowing this entrance configuration are enclosed. However, this location would be an operational liability for 84 Lumber Company, because it would allow access to the lumber storage building to the rear of the property that could not be observed from the office. I would therefore request that the Planning Commission consider an alternate entrance configuration, for which four sets of drawings are also enclosed. This layout places the entrance approximately in the center of the parcel. Although this entrance would interrupt the vegetative screening along Haven Avenue.- the landscaping plan indicates that this interruption would not be significant. An enlarged planting bed has been indicated opposite the entrance to compensate for the break in the screening and to reduce the paved area visible from the street; the view presented to Haven Avenue by this alternative would seem to me to be preferable to the ninety foot deep parking area and fence with gate that would be visible from an entrance located to the north. If you agree with me that this second alternative is more acceptable of the two, please base your review on the drawings that show the center entrance. If not, please consider the drawings showing the entrance to the north and I will try to assist 84 Lumber Company in adapting to an undesirable entrance condition. `C 'O _ C&IMM FAM4 Commercial Prooerty.Design. Management a AF'a� Page 2 Please note that minor changes in the building configuration (reduction of . the front porch from 24' to 12' deep) and the addition of five employee parking spaces are also indicated on the draw;nae �.•r .;..�a Thank you for your cooperation in the review of these plans. Sincerely, Jam_. Craierril Johnson. Consulting Architect CMJcrk Enclosures GL7 �ONY R�CCLY i CITY OF RANCH,) CUCAMOINGA c�'RA STAFF REPORT �� . ; � =I i- DAIE: iz December 14, 1983 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Pianning Com.nission f FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner By: Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner _ 'EJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83-17 - 84 LUMBER - The development or a 31,200 sq. ft. bui :_ing . or 84 Lumber on 2.55 acres in the Industrial Pars ` category (Subarea 6) , located on the west side of Haven, south of 8th Street - APN 209-251-05. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a precise site plan and architectural design, and issuance of a Necative Declaration. B. Purpose: Construction of a 31,200 square foot retail and storage building for 84 Lumber Company I C. Location: The west side of Haven Avenue, south of Sth Street D. Parcel Size: 2.55 acres E. Existinq Zonino: Inuastrial Area SpeL4fi;- Pia-., industrial Park category Subarea 6) r F. Existira Land Use: '. avant G. Surroundina Land ',. e and Zoninq: North - Single f,:mi y�T- homes and service and industrial businesses, Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 6) South - Master Buiiders/Industrial, ISP (Subarea 6) East - KVL/industrial, ISP (Subarea 6) West - Vacant, ISP (Subarea 6) H. General Plan D=_sianations: Project Site - inoustria "Park North - industrial Park South - Industrial Park East Industrial Park West - Industrial Park PLANNING COMMISSIAdlk�STAFF REPORT Conditional Use P,-..nit 83-17/84 Lumber December 14, 1983 Page 2 I. Site Characteristics: The site slopes north to south at an average rate of 2 Percent. Vegetation is limited to indigenous grasses and weeds and a small number of cactus plants exist at the extreme north end of the property. A 50-foot wide Metropolitan Water District (MWD) easement crosses the south end of the property. II. ANALYSIS: A. General : This project was originally submitted for preliminary review as two metal buildings with loading doors facing the street. The exterior materials now includes split-faced block, cedar siding, fiberglass windows, and a metal roof. The buildings are situated one behind the other with the loading doors located on the north and south elevations. A 6-foot high cedar fence with split-faced block pilasters will be provided south of the storage building to help screen the loading area. Access will be provided off of a 26-foot wid= 1-iveway aligned with Acacia Street on the west side of Haven. 8. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee reviewed the project and recommended several items including: (1) increasing the roof overhang on the east elevation; (2) providing a landscape planter with trees in front of the building; (3) screening the southerly loading area with a cedar and masonry fence; and, (4) further review of the metal roof color and white fiberglass panels. Item numbers (1) and (2) above were adequately addressed by the applicant. The cedar and masonry fence is provided as recommended by the Com.mittee; however, the split-faced block pilasters are proposed to be placed 40 feet on center. This spacing is too far apart. Therefore, a condition has been included in the Resolution to require pilasters to be spaced on 20-foot centers. Regarding the metal rcof and fiberglass panels, the Committee requested that samples of the actual materials to be used in the building be submitted. Both samples will be available at the meeting for your review. Of concern to staff is the fiberglass panels :which are less than one-sixteenth of an inch thick and similar to fiberglass used on patio covers. As shown on the building_ elevations (Exhibit "G") , the fiberglass panels are proposed below the eaae line on the east and west elevations. Considering the higher design standards generally [. applied to projects on special boulevards such as Haven Avenue staff recommends that dark bronze glass be required in place of the fiberglass. A ccndition of approval is provided for vour review. 9a/14/Am `'' - STiVaF Rf�RT PLANNING COMMISSIAkSTAFF REPORT Conditional Use Pewit 83-17/84 Lumber December 14, 1983 Page 3 C. Develooment Review Committee: The Development Review Committee reviewed the project and determined that, with the recommended conditions of approval , the project is consistent with all appiicable standards and ordinances. The Foothill Fire Protection District required an emergency fire lane at the southwest corner cf the project as shown on the sitp nlan A conaition of approval is provided for vour review which requires that the fire lane be constructed with turf block or turf overlay and a rolled curb versus 'tie drive approach shown on the site plan. The Engineering Division will require an expanded right-of-way on the Haven access to permit the future construction of a railroad cndercrossing just north of 8th Street. In addition, the applicant must provide a lien agreement for street improvements along the south project boundary. This will provide the flexibility to allow the future construction of Acacia Street east of Haven Avenue if and when it becomes necessary. D. Gradinq Committee: Tne Grading Committee reviewed and approved the conceptual grading plan with a number of conditions necessary for it to meet City standards. A final grading plan with the appropriate corrections will be required prior to issuance of building permits. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial. Study has been completed by the applicant. Staff has completed the Environmental Checklist are found no significant adverse environmental impacts as a result of this project. If the Commission concurs with these findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the industrial 4rea Specific Plan and the General Plan. The proposed use, building design and si`e plan together with the recommended conditions of approval is in compliance with all applicable City standards. in addition, the project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environmental impacts. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Dail Report newspaper and notices were sent to all property owners within feet of the subject cite. In addition, public hearing notices were posted on the Property. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. PLANNING COMM!SS)I AftSTAFF REPORT "l Conditional Use Pe„iit 83-17/84 Lumber December 14, 1983 Page 4 V. RECOMMENDATION: It is reco., ended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to consider public input and elements of this project. If after such consideration, the Commission concurs wits the facts for findings and conditions of approval, adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaratior would be appropriate. Re-7actfil1Iv C4 Rick Gomez City ;r 1 arner j RG:CJ:jr Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - General Plan and ISP Exhibit "C" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Illustrative Site Plan Exhibit "E" - Grading Plan Exhibit "F" - Building Perspective Exhibit "G" - Building Elevation Initial Study, Part I Resolution 4S7WW FIG. IV-6 ARROW.OwOwOeOwO 00e000 CIRCULATION 2 OS woe 100' R.O.W. D p �-� 88' or less R.O.W. RAIL SERVICE o Existing +++-+ Proposed ara sF as TRAILS/ROUTES l p 0000 Pedestrian Owes Bicycle e r ,u�= atis•e Regional Multi-Use 7 � --�^^ Special Streetscape/ •• a Landscaping ® Power Llne/ Gi = Utility Easement , -»-- Creeks & Channels o e o 8 O o w+ O h O n e e n o math n Bridge ! S l fi Access Points Park - k;;lk441 l s z © Fire Station o � ono w • be a o olo ece *4ttg O 400 S00 1600 a NORTH CITY OF RAi\CHO Ct;CALNNIO\GA TITLE: i�-%r�.A -� f'r. f.✓ PLC: N I\G DIVISION' EX III'm 'L SCALD '' rZ faf lg-S •. !_ P qftL IGp� I - �t_L _ ~ � • y 1. i P i 1 - V NORTH CITY OF ITE.N1: _cl" °F3-17 RANCHO CUCAN 1ONGA Tnu: a PLAN TN DID ISK?V EXHIBIT: 3 _SCALE: ' t, /? °"` � � w � t�s � ; �j;yam' til' � � - �• i i law r // - II i \ NORTH CITY OF ITE\1: -•.,%per-rr RANCHO CL:CAL 10\G.-k TITLE. . Q95EW Pc�� PL.AN`;\I,NG DID OONT Ex1,113m G SCALE - • _/�/ A __-___ ___•� ti-A- S) h. 77 _ o I FORTH CITY OF ITEM: RAN'CIr O C;CNXIONG TITL£- - ;%.�•,�/ PLkINNI\G DIN ISON E\HiP,IT= SCALE, .E �a lMi�3 4` • c�.aCL Pc�A'�"1' A 001, ® E34 1..UMEBSP & lf-EE']ME CEmNTER STOPS -iv1 mERspRojw CaNTY . . .Calf-).tttdlA CM(a rem--mmm!@4 Atasy. ;a7 amaL-jas a v_ury r� _.PFIQL'�11YMLA.t' Caen-8ts r•' v FORTH CITY OF ji-Em: cuP 8 5 - iz RANCHO CL'C=kN10\G:k Tom_ 6;�W RZ��, Y PLANNING DiXrb- N E41i1BIT- SCALE- _ c-r� ,�� stun► y1 1 I,�( I �" it r- . 1:1 1�:Irl� I�n.•.11 Ilf:rl'lL I1iI�ll n�.illl�"h III!I'.: /i11I I�•� .I� u i .. iTi�� I. . 1 . ; 1 .�y1 P 4 9 `/y�i � (P v tw o jl Tr • � l* I - III r ; . 1 _ / ' I � ; IL 1 I I (; ! I - --� _ II;II I ! !�11 -- - == �1,`11 •N •� :.•;.— J �= O 4� ! 4�_ :.sue/"". , s..i'�, il' • r 1 I J ' �M I ': I .I'I ;I' 1 i'r I Ill :i'll� Ilil Ali•I'I yy n i I 1, !'! . �- -I'•as ai; I '7 I•.:I :I 1 I I 'I. I Purl :I 1 .I .1.. 11'1 a 1; wt- m! --- - _ e L� `FORTH CITY OF RANCHO CLC.AL.EIO\G A TITLE PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: t- SCS.LE= /s 3 • G-ra rt v-pAoieer Commissioner Rempel stated all of these areas must be addressed and the only way to z.ddress them is-thro & a cc_^� 1 -.,.-�..e environmentai study. Chairman Stout stated he sees this area as sensitive as that above Beryl. t Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Rempel, carried unanimously, that staff be directed to prepare an environmental impact report to study all of the issues involved as outlined in the initial study. Chairman Stout stated the Commision would return to item F, Environmental Aasessmenz and Tentative Tract 12433 - g g B. Mr. Hopson stated that the Planning Commission rules indicate that two members of the Commission or less than a quorum could be used to adopt minutes. However, to say that two members could perform the official act of adopting a tract map would be stretching the rules, in his opinion. Mr. Hopson stated he felt that less than a quorum should not approve something as significant as land use determinations or a tract map, and this being the case, did not feel that this item could be considered this evening. Mr. Gomez stated the applicant has asked for a continuance of this item. Chairman Stout asked if testimony could be taken this evening without a quorum. rr. Hop-con repiied that the problem is that the purpose of a hearing is to ` have a quor".:-- of the formal body hear the testimony and since they are not present, the testimony tcaight would serve no purpose. Commissioner Rempel again left the Commission table. Mr. Frank Scardini, 11601 Wilshire Blvd., Los Angeles , indicated they would not want to put anyone or. a spot and asked for a continuance to a date certain. Chairman Stout asked if January 11 , 1984 would be agreeable to them. Mr. Scardini replied it would. Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Stout; carried, that this item be continued to January 11 , 1984. f it ! if i 8:15 P - 2- The Planning Commission recessed. 1 8:25 P.m- 'he Planning Commission reconvened. Planning Commission Minutes 1 December 14, 1983 40!f 17 H. ENVIROTMrairrAL ASSESS?CNT AND CONDITIONAL USE P=RMIT 8 1'/ 84 Lut'CiER - The development of a 31 ,200 sq. ft. building for 84 Lumber o: 2.55 acres in the Industrial ?ark category (Subarea 6) , located on the west side of Haven, south of 8tt Street - A?N 209-251-05. Assistant Planner, Curt Johnston, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout asked if Mr. Johnston had an overhead slid? showing the detail of the driveway approach. Mr. Johnston showed the Commission the driveway approach for 84 Lumber and the adjacent property, KVL, on the overhead projector and explained the situation to them. Chairman Stout asked who owns the driveway approach that sides-on to the driveway. Mr. Johnston replies that it is owned by KVL and the property is L-shaped or a flag lot. Mr. Johnston further stated that there is a MWD easement which precludes any building on any portion of the easement to the east of this and is one of the reasons that the street is shown on it. Mr. John Rickey, 293 Birchwood, Moraga, CA 94556 , stated that he would answer any questions. Chairman Stout asked if any agreement had been worked on between the applicant and KVL. Mr. Rickey replied that he thought they had a preliminary agreement. Mr. Bob Kirkland, 8978 Haven, Rancho Cucamonga, read a letter dated December 7, 1983, addressed to Paul Rougeau, to the Commission which stated that no agreement had been reached between KVL and 84 Lumber. Further, that Mr. Bose stated to him that there would be a road whether one is needed or not. Mr. Kirkland stated that he is opposed to the 84 Lu::ber project because of the access problem and they they will not p.-ovide access for the 84 Lumber project. Further, Mr. Kirkland said that the road would reduce 6.12 acres to 3.2 and would destroy West Coast Netting by going through the property. Mr. Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer, referred to Subarea 6 and the Industrial Specific Plan. He indicated that the road in question is necessary_ to connect 8th Street with Haven when the railroad undercrossing goes in. Further, that when development of circulation for the Indu^trial Specific Plan was taking place, it appeared logical to have the road run along the north side of KVL property and turn, to Acacia because that is the only place where it could cut into Haven Avenue due to the median island. Mr. Rougeau stated that this is not an essential requirement for Eighth Street because it could intersect at other places, and it has been explained to Mr. Kirkland that the only time the road would be obtai- ned would be if he subdivided. Further, it Planning Commission Minutes 8 December 14, 1983 - 070 J. is vaguely possible that at some point in time the city could condemn the property to put in a road if it felt it was absolutely necessary for circulation in the area. Mr. Rougeau stated providing access to 84 Lumber ! will absolutely not affect the street going in or not going in. • Chairman Stout stated that Mr. Rougeau indicated there will be a median cut in Acacia. He asked if another driveway is put in for 84 Lumber and the median cut was placed at that driveway could the driveway be closed off and could KVL be forced to use only the one driveway for 84 Lumber so that there will be only one opening to Haven. Mr. Roug iu replied that this could be done but it would create a problem with the street across because the offset goes the other way and it would therefore not be aligned. Chairman Stout asked if there would have to be some legal technicalities worked out for the access between 84 Lumber and KVL. !'L-. Rougeau replied that is correct because there is no way that the City can force them to provide the access. Chairman Stout asked Mr. Kirkland if it is his position that if he provided the access for 84 Lumber it would cause a road to be placed there. Mr. Kirkland replied that is is his feeling that his flag ht will be consumed by that road and not shared. Commissioner Rempel asked where the DW? easement is . Z Mr. Kirkland replied that their driveway is in the middle. Commissioner Rempel stated that the road Mr. Kirkland is talking about that would affect his factory is the road that will go north and not this road. Chairman Stout stated that it sounds like the problem is a legal issue that should be settled by the two property owners involved. There was brief further discussion relative to the driveway between Mr. Kirkland and Chairman Stout. M.r. John Rickey stated Mr. Kirkland has thrown a curve to him tonight and it is his understanding that there will not be a curb cut or a left turn approach on Haven because if you go north you can turn north anyway. Mr. Rougeau replied this is not correct as there are median breaks at 7th Street and also at Acacia. Mr. Rickey stated that is not his understanding. Planning Commission Minutes 9 December 14, 1983 Mr. Rougeau stated looking at the circulation plan you have a major street at 6th STreet. Mr. Gomez stated there are other, alternatives that can be considered, and if the Commission wishes to have more information brought back to them, this item could be continued. Chairman Stout closed the public hearing. Cr.ariman Stout stated he did not think the access problem is insurmountable and asked if here is a plan for a street there at the present time or not. Mr. Rouaeau replied that the current condi`.icris of approval do not call for improve=?nts for any future street, only Haven. Further, there are no plans to improve the north side of the driveway as a street. Mr. Rickey stated that he is at an impasse and lie needs to know if they will be able to get into his property. Further, he and Mr. Kirkland need to know what will happen. Commissioner Rempel stated that he cannot see that th> street will ever come down from the north into the property. Mr. Kirkland suggested that the decision on this be put off until the next meeting. Commissioner Barker asked what role the Planning Commission will play in this if the applicant and Mr. Kirkland do not reach an agr�,emnt and whether the Commission could come up with an action. Further, he asked if the Commission could adopt a resolution contingent upon the two parties coming to an agreement and then this would not have to come back to the Commission. Mr. Gomez stated that if you allow an opportunity for an out there is always the possibilty that negotiations will not be continued in good faith. Mr. Stout stated that this is a civil issue that will have to be decided between the two parties. However, because of the Commission's thoughts and plans on how thel want Haven to be, this is the only solution. If agreement is not reached, he stated, this can to brought back to the Commission. Mr. Hopson stated that he does not see a legal problem with this and is the only way it can be done. Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Rempel, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 83-141 approving CUP No. 83-17 and issuing a negative declaration contingent upon access agreement between the two parties . a c * t r Planning Commission Minutes 10 December 14 , 1983 �- -aa RESOLUTION NO. 83-141 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMDNGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 83-17 FOR 84 LUMBER LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE, SOUTH OF 8TH STREET IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARrr. CATEGORY (SUBAREA of WHEREAS, on the 7th day of October, 1983, a complete application was filed by 84 Development Company for review of the above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 146h day of December, 1983, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above-described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the follow-Inc findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, and the purposes of the zone ir. which the use is proposed; and 2. That the proposed use, tooether with the conditions ® applicable thereto, wil.I not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning OYdInance. SECTION 2: That this project will .:ot create adverse impacts on the environment an, that a Negative Declaration is issued an December 14, 1983. SECTION 3: That Conditional. Use Permit No. 83-17 is approved subject to the following conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. The white fiberglass panels on the buildings shall be replaced with Kalwall panels consisting of bronze glass and mullins. Final design details shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. 2. The cedar and masonry fence on the south side of the loading area shall be provided with pilasters at 20 feet on center versus the 40-foot spacing proposed. Page 3. The access 13�e at the southeast corner of the site shall be for emergency purposes only and designed with turf block or a 6-inch turf overlay, aid rollec: :urb versus the drive approach shown on the site Plan. Enoineerina Division 4. The '`inal grading plan shall be revised per Grading Committee comments prior to issuance of building perc :rc, 5. A Lien Agreement or in-lieu cash deposit shall be required for construction of Acacia Street prior to issuance of building permit. 6. The centerline of the driveway along the south boundary of the project site shall have a maximum offset of five (5) feet f:om the centerline of the existing Acacia Street on the east side of Haven Avenue. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14th DAY OF DECEMBER, 1983. PLAN ING OM'aTSSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: enniS L. -Stout ymairnan a 7 g _ . etary of the Planning Col:ssion I, RICK GOI Acting Secretary of the PlanningCommission of the City o, Rancho4Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foreoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plarnina Commiss�or of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Ca on the 14th day of December, 1983, by the following vote-to-wit: �, ission held AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, REMPEL, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: C@-"II:ISSIONERS: JUAREZ, MC".I_L oTzGtov�4�. ��5, v o d .�v�. e•- r u - 1 cco c- cccc moV t dNr -LCC C 6 �Cnt 4=` ry oMCr V' =7 � N L_✓.- qU q� Vp V CV CO ✓ uEd = ✓ N V)� ✓-'3L q �r 'V ` u. Y •0 U'. = O- OO« LO' L� O G l LNfp > J� O � p pL lTO L moor uoc dnu o«" = o -- = war •+ " d d w c r..� ;_ c s - - T d r n N p N o✓ � n _ - f N O � C O✓� T q,r L d = q > d � N G• 'i O✓ N� O l G g � lG d- NO✓ .n= q U_ V 9r9 CV✓G d LC ^_ •y"? _ O O✓C d CC � O C� �' .Li. q NO y._ d =ram N dO` C �- � f✓ ' d ` _C^ Y' V lJ y > 'a GPO SC Oq ,n .J^ '\. Ol nC�r C �rp yC q C -L L ✓ w 6- O 6 O O' C d l -L r✓ O Y p > V�V O S _V � r_ O ,� G�✓ ' C V T = G _JO yPF '� zO �t.L.• G4l � oL- cl, E 4:EU NEE poc > P� GLy � o � y GGO�r On��d - ✓J �L ' N c, 2Nd 060E rOa'o C � 0�9 d` N y0 't _ d yj� qP p "n - coo` G ma ` `nP E= ✓o.ca �n > .lac O G o0 .nV gdl^ O G M09 Cy 9Pn > 6N- OV Qp n L G- 6 Q7nV 6n6G < q,r0 6L > GM -Np HL NO Q3 P r~ p qZ tid L dd P> I ( I r M ` C-O C V a R✓j G d V O r y 5 < av I � ` N r d Lzc IN r `M V = iyF 6�7C NC l O- GC. V \ � -- qq \N C ✓ L.. r ,� M1 ay` J <_ > qdV CCiC Cq� ✓ = yL �- C.� ,r --G N 1 '0 Ty C' d0 .dL y .a u_ ✓ G L•�• Tua LN i •'1 � • ` 9 � y J u 9 j✓ d u C L i-G C E- D = N.-- V L�u� n � \� L L `✓ w0"L y00 LC - n - NGV � = ^, OLD � _� U q' > >oq GV y Z� ✓ C q^ 4 r L __ a n f C O `. _ n _N. o •e� ` Nr a[.Y.iDi. T_'_ -r -_ rb Y wd= E :. u d � Lac .��. ya� - PGn= _- rDG.a o' .'.ar vL �✓'.o.. 4q G d C O q I�� •' O a � .'r u a 0 y-• .p.'_� '�� N G C� D L O L n - � G• V _a l G "•� i G L O _ �✓ 2 �n^G S G �� EL .n _.V. Cr fji o ' _.. CJ r :�Cur_ .J� iN � OCJUr.:a.G✓�3�' N .-'- NC _ ca_ L ✓T) c 2 .>)LL ✓�_ o _ L L G O G u V r. i =o ��✓ c'` F~ C.G. G"� d 7 Y N adi' � O..� a .' q _ LE qDD= OVN� GCa -. GC q..r VQL q _,C q .r nn CO C�'LQ .nN . MC q0 G _O pL ant'7CF qPO GVpj...r c✓ 6.O Nv� O V' N � CAL L � O L L .. O ^ L d q L O a`r'1 G u _ `✓ L O� V N � i l i y q y Uq Nu NG cL'.O. �^ o -`to`C EC LLrr� D.ai Or Vn oJo.`J .Nn ^bc c ✓- as - �-_� 4!` ,0, c ` o� _ _G ca_o N To pr = m �« �e .� =J �`ao q c dr « _ LJ q O cc oca .".. o � _✓ o �i c o y b2 ^� n_ C G N ✓y OdVJUNd Od V� i: CN✓� ✓ a Ou YO.� t] � O 6 J V� p C�V y ✓ C 4✓ C L b V r C� ^u G -�C G G C G C 7 �. q t � V ._ qN Vb'L lq✓� _ .Go q� 2u��-J U2u � - 09 V' GN✓ - ✓ O - r� FCC iuM � Nr .•..VL7N uC u0 �-' r - H U C V r L N9C � G C < E r 6 G 6 G L G G G� S M g M L�� 6� V g G O S r l q S� '•� N a i 6 9 N b C N p�M C� .p V6 �Tpalf � �L bN 9 •_+ Tb d _ S d✓aN 4 C 2 L n O O�?.Li O c t LD. O C C 2 N V V^. q r✓ b r V L C n d 6G N� > q f✓ G a O L � J��.J N L `V L q T a r F 2 9 O 6' 9 d U O 6 L O G r r d� � V L q i - L N r Q t ✓� N D. q � T y C L .L.. P` r V _ q ✓j L_r M G'�r V �� V r O N J N C O C _ ✓ C .C.. > 4 G p C < L. 6 '� G Y d c d q r✓� C P u L C V Y q L f C C O_• =G=u i r C N .. N L p O r O N j_� � c C C L� y V N U 9 L _J C C ✓_ GOy cNr ^� i� q. NOv. c• CiC¢ O c✓ n- 2 L.+ r� q 2 L G.`- C C r v G "� L C •J E = O O✓ V O C S = � G= = U );S C_ 2 O F q -J r V ✓ ? E Nc N G G V g L G v C pL_ O l _ ✓ V V _ %C N S✓ P j �� c _ S � N _N J�. r n G _- L_ V GO .e CT_ y ^r Ga_ n CCTC ` Ory _ L ^ N C � Q r V N V q ✓i C L r• C r r a G L r<V u- C N G NL QV OpCigr C`� NCS CG �. N� G` � C� CG c 1 w� -Ez „ ♦ 1 o •+•' o > TJi Tt v E N - n .r.•o c = VDu � iN dr v c_ n �N co E L i c >• T p V p� p d O C : p �VGOO rr Cr � GyD D � O— �•G Dr ` O ^Q 7 C C_.L+ O U L V O N P y O L r Zmo �rrC Q.D L � IU06 Lr NS UV� U pL LTr O� �V O � ICp�P Lpp TT' ~ � LV ?a WE: fT D „DDV ra 30 G Cq Er..� CL.� dN — G- n ^G-J C _ C •J � q •O u V r N '�D ._� �l0. • r a d_ NVgD rL NY 4L. Oyu V .a CE V_�DY _• V �EOV �CUiN C > 0 9 N W. V i U T O N ' r 9 i i L• G� Oi P N M t N N V C r N n p•Vn c p L N L J _ Ni F N O O lv Cy ` C VaV PGyE b ^r 4N P� rt— Y C C Cr C ^rat O Cr N� p� 9 TO YO f.0 M u 9 '/� t Q 60 N Er q `— y d C� N— C V qy C d P•.• 9 O V � T d •O Q L_`• ` O J` > y v e 7 T 7 S'• L O G+d' C >•`J a C C P � 3 y C K C M > CSC^ O EL' G C 'L � L _ 6 r -) ••� 9 O C S i d q •^ 9 r C d L r i^u E P P i C N W r 9 VY DLO N�O^•T. L `� da CV O dU✓ u d0� NNC u0-r L�•fL rd Gy 6N JT� LO F A q <L O = V cn wl 71 P, ^I 71 �I ^I �i ri NI TI qo - dd �= �oL oa�cm Como c+L °1 •sii u g C O V 21 C C n T > 7 T C r r O c ` J • C L T v O V Y G_ Y ` y T T 'n 6 d_ C L l G •� ri L t u ^V V r N �_p p• d p o y i L e a T u M1 Lr = O rL - nee �• „�, c Er •� yo d^' p - .d„ i _ E-J C T J• h rQ L L _ N V C a •.T Gu c— i t u V i NO C U C0. O. EV V. O ON � CPC T ` � V � V� i �u•T n lJ O� •j iTG� CrL U -• p' i ._ q vC L rC — TO C P L N N �G C C N L� ' C .!.• 2 N �O = O =0 0 V CJ2 l r C C U` C > — T L N V O u O U ` •� r O G COS N C' d� 6Dy ^ VV— T V E� 4 �a � ` Z—LC•`.. p ' V Cy NC C•f C � = NO C-J T =j ✓ 2� ruL n= _ �DN b C S.� �✓Ji r —^•�C C +`a •J u— N -J U 9 0 N b —D .N ' _ _ V d G `� O G_ •� L G u � e+O O r_ • C�V '^ • T M V M � T— V W V T q' = r L C I c c E c G o W. ro o� a c' _. _'• c c= `_-'�:.. a ov Ln oc D � Lc.`. P> m o ii i r�V` OP=. .. i E -L. E or•�nNc i J T r b �•.— L —�G ` G i N l C' E d P — N v u V V Q' N OGTN— 4N� 6D P,p. INdW C • L JI� NI V S� 7 - TG CiFq � C N _ CC L iP` 3 CC V 'OV r 'L" V - 7P2 7r q A cAVTp CCV dV OA E� -� AW VU 6C`-� d V V d q r• N V W_ � l O...6 6 L V L _ C 4-'- .a_ L -79 dq COGVE M do CC OS � O UCV�� O� .-.1 a OuC� Q Vr�4 .w C� T rC CND O'> A O'er G Et r >•p N d I C5`t P r O > d 0 d _ U A Fj O d- G d O C L 6LWN L-7�C N �I Lyj WN9 WV4J 76 tJ� p34�n 4PV 6Va0 I I Q v c - C V G, C Tr Ic •I r1r O V O� 'r -� ` V •>e d C �. O I r _ ! C a.0 q`r A IG C I AC GO AC_ 00 ` O Py � l L C� q0 GC:ti r <C VC VpC ` rl GV. `A G' C V CL OC �i J � > CC I nJ7U C - C� 5l u s u > N a. rn �� > D. N .T. a .r•oc � , V q Ld• N?� : N = v — ."�.. N s � i I I I 0 0 •� � V q o � >� i � o c� u o c: m I Law I — CL c �' G d c - _ c o V do—_ _ E C >.c dC E� Ty9 cd.. 4J P� 7a — N3 I�i I I I c > 11 y N L C N_ C•n d N N N V C C N q I I I P 1 gy .aCl 000 O> PJN Oir _jC �� T d 166 ' 1 I N •- I _ L � 9 � `� �s =-�.. - fir : o r I JI I o� :t ^ qU _J Fb 'e '.v3N .T y� teOG• i di 'p pppE��I � I 4 7 w Pdc da S� T?�FC — .' c ��_ _ �r` u__ '"Te o jV � � •� Y V rECr U � VVV �rOn bqG rQOC•O DLE YCd O_ — jd C � I I __ V P d d N O O q O G q r Q q G q � ...r � L � l I •r C np V r V N q_ _ > c o L r C-- L e• - uc ..� - - o N O Z CI CE Y^ d Y. G�V C � G_�P r C-•� C� —r r� � .r. Cn � N q N N � i G N T S C 1 2 C O M 1 g C � � � _ • r am L.� - ` N 9 G• n N OV>V, CggG On_ E_ L WC-]D tOV VO Cq O_• _ _ g < a' L _ � VO Cj C! =1 d: O C 9 _ C n O l E O � p ✓ � _ L — I I O P d L 6-. - G U T J L �✓ L I I ✓ d p O J I .2 � •`' S q i ^-L�{ o L � ✓_ � I �Y O i N di I v C -• a� S y IOj _ � rr. ?.N V_ C q c^ 2 nO _ � VP -� ' _✓ O'. O -f V �_ O i n f✓7 N .Or 1 O= ,r c>• C CI LL O I err.�.. ' O✓ ` �L q I ✓ a � dt � LL Or^_ _ y q G 6N C � S O IN— S— •--r I I <✓ G N J �� qI� ! ^I pl � I ^I ! P ✓ I 77 u c u + d y d I� t� rNNa G OV d9 � = •n OV M= C N .-. l T�—✓ IC n C L L > O -J iLir _ '`✓ O < ✓.0 C n P I� r uOi r ✓L ur L r < (<(''M� u u 'o LC L I O Y �j r N b r N 11< G •T O = 7 b O � = G V G 2� J D Iir OL NOLi. ` � Odp NN N? c N N Q LJr Gp--• dE i dL S f N N V�o _ `O n9M•Jf � LT � ^< dd 4cy .O.r y = L�`>� Y �<(�p_ LrT SUYu - _ 1 VTC� l UO lT ✓ O qC L C✓ `� .+ `✓-J P� L OL�L G ,,`I U C V O G C J_l� G^ri w C O.r a ✓ C C '� O T C✓ _ WCV CO q �V�i_ _ _ � �L _ _G ✓ Pq•..1 d �V ` 'V _ n .7✓ _ V P; F > OS p O C C �. `✓ p=.V- D C < fO v •JN > 9— �� CGC' Yl � G✓ — VyC — n lV �� O d C r.J' l ` O T U �_ _ O^ q ` �� N� ✓ O✓ C C C +f Lvl ✓L r � a"� TLD NV=— r^� ' _� ` cam ry YQ `�--� - N_ �M V]py a✓ �o-. o Hu air au ens u✓ Nc er— o I � � ^ 0 P •C-r • nr ! I -30 IN 0 a.a l.� O ..7 O L C r\ _ V N r e ^J G T 9 L q r � O _ O ^ON Jd� r L I r� uri G- V C q n � P V T C� � • �. C_ 'J c � l 4I I it a RESOLUTION NO. 83-141A A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AMENDING THE APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 83-17 FOR 84 LUMBER LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE, SOUTH OF 8TH STREET IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK CATEGORY (SUBAREA 6) WHEREAS, on the 7th day of October, 1983, a complete application was filed by 84 Development Company for aview of the above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 14th day of December, 1983, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing and . aviewed and approved the abovL- described project; and WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of February, 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider revision to the building design, site plan, and conditions of approval for the above described project; and WHEREAS, approval of the revised Conditional UsP Permit should void the previously approved conditions as contained in Planning Co;3nission Resolution 82-141. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: What the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, and the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed; and 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or ;mprovements in the vicinity; and 3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on December 14, 1983. Resolution 33-141A Page 2 SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permnit No. 83-17 is approved subject to the following conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. The white fiberglass panels on the buildings shall be replaced with Kalwall panels consisting of bronze glass and mullins. Final design details stall be submitted for review and approval by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. 2- The cedar and masonry fence on the south side of the loading area shall be provided with pilasters at 20 feet on center ,-versus the 40-foot spacing proposed. 3. Temporary and future secondary access lar s shall be for emergency purposes only and designed with turf block or 6-inch turf overlay and rolled curb. ENGINEERING DIVISION 1. The final grading plan shall be revised per Grading Committee comments prior to issuance of building permits. 2. The proposed Haven Avenue driveway .fall be removed and a permanent driveway or, Acacia Street shill be constructed at the time of construction of the Haven Avenue railroad separation or Acacia Street construction, whichever comes first. 3. Prior to issuance of building permit, a lien, agreement shall be executed for the future removal of Haven Avenue driveway, conversion of aisleway along the building's west side to a landscaped area as per Industrial Specific Plan streetscape requirements, and construction of Acacia Street improvements along the south and west bouncary including curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway, street lights, street trees and a minimum of 26-foot wide A.C. pavement. 4. A 1-5-foot wide offer of dedication for street right-of-way along the west property line shall be required prior to issuance of building permit. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF FE3RJARY. 1984 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: lck omen, puty ecretary Resolution 83-141A Page 3 ANIL I, Pick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Cormission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Cormniss .on of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of February, 1984, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONLAS: -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA G�can1plc STAFF REPORT Z DATE: February 22, 1984 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Frank Dreckman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12523 - LIGHTNER - The development of 35 single family homes on T.-5,�—acres of land in the "L" District (2-4 du/ac) , located on the north side of Lemon Avenue, 600 feet east of Archibaid Avenue - APN 201-251-09. i 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of subdivision map, site plan, and elevations. B. Purpose: Development of 35 single family detached homes. C. Location: North side of Lemon A%enue, 600 feet east of ArchibalET Avenue. D. Parcel Size: 9.55 acres E. Existinq Zoninq: Low, 2-4 du/ac F. Existing Land Use: Vacant G. Surrourdino Land Use and Zonina: North - Vacant, Low Density, -4 du/ac South - Vacant, Low Medium, 4-8 du/ac East - Single Family Residential , Low Density, 2-4 du/ac West - Vacant, Low Density, 2-4 du/ac H. General Plan Desi nations: . ro3ect ate - Low ;1enFzty Residential, 2-4 du/ac Norih - Low Density Kesiden=ial, 2-4 du,'ac South - Medium Density Residential, 4-14 d-./F.c East - Low Density Residential , 2-4 du/dC West - Low Density Residential , 2-4 du/ac I. Project Density - 3.6 du/ac ITEM F Tentative TractV12523/Lightner February 22, 1984 Page 2 J. Site Characteristir_s: The project site consists of a 9.5 acre Parcel compose of indigenous plant materials and existing mature trees located contiguous to Lemon Street. In addition, an existing house, located on Lemon Street, is to be removed prior to construction of dwellings. The site slopes in a north/south direction to Lemon Street. Existing street imDrave-ments consist of pam veent only. Curbs, yilttcrs, ar1u' sidewalks are isot existing- II. ANALYSIS: A. General : The applicant is proposing the development of a single family development of 35 sinale family dwellings on 35 lots (Exhibit "A") . As illustrated, the proposed tract ha- peen desig.;ed with a variety of setbacks and/or widths which provide va.-iety and visual interest. Access to the project will be provided from Lemon Street via London Avenue, located contiguous to the westerly property line. Lot sizes within the development are comprisoad of parcels between 7,725 and 10,900 sq. ft. which are consistent and compatible with existing developments to the east. The project is consistent with the Development District regulations and the General Plan. 40 B. Desi n Review Committee: The Design Review Committee was primarily concerned with the rear-on lot configurations which will be located contiguous to Lemon Street. As illustrated on the site utilization map (Exhibit "A") , the proposed rear-on lot configuration appears to be inconsistent with the front-on configuration to the east. The Design Review Committee, although concerned with the loss of streetscape continuity resulting ,from the rear-on situation, felt that many of the applicant 's reasons for this design had merit. However, the Committee directed staff to prepare a more detailed analysis for consideration by the Planning Commission. Staff Analvsis: Front-on vs, rear-on parcel configurations: Situation: Initially, staff recommended to the Design Review ommmittee the elimination of the proposed rear-or, parcel configuration, in favor of providing front-on parcels which would be consistent with existing parcels to the east. However, further investigation has revealed that a steep embankment, sloping south away from the southern edge of Lemon Street, will more than likely prevent front-on lot configurations opposite the proposed Lightner Development. Ultimately, a rear-en lot pattern will probably occur, on this F - a Ii i PLANTING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT f Tentative Tract 12523/Lightner February 22, 1984 Page 3 g southeriv parcel . In order to accommodate a front-on lot qq design. on the south side of Le:non, a significant slope of 20-30 feet would be c-eated along those lots. In addition to the grading problems, the zoning and land use designation on tie lout:i side of Lemon is in a different density -ante of a-8 units per acre. With this kind of density, it islikely that homes would not be designed to be fronted on Lemon and if done would most " ikeiy not be as comparable in terms of size and scale. Staff Recommendation: Due to the anticipated inability to locate front-on parcels on the property cpposite'the Lightner project, it is recommended that the proposed rear-on parcel configuration be approved subject to an extensive landscape buffer to be placed contigu-nus to Lemon Avenue. In addition, the proposed block wall should be designed in such a fashion as to provide variety and visual interest through the use of reveals, block wall details (i -e., the caps, decorative scored concrete block, etc.) or transparent materials such as wrought iron. A condition of approval has been provided on the attached Resolution which fully addresses this situation. The applicant has indicated that a front-on design would not be capable of accommodating the homes designed for this development- C. Develcoment Review Committee: The Develop-ment Review :onnittee was primarily concerned witty drainage and stated that the applicant will be required to join the Alta Loma Assessment District when formed. However, if the Assessment District is not fermed, the applicant will be required to improve the existing channel least property line) with concrete and add inlet/outiei structures D. Gradino Committee: The Grading Committee has approved the conceptual grading plan subject to submittal and approval of a final grading plan. E. Environmental Assessment: Part 1 of the Initial Study has been comp ieted by the applicant. Staff has completed the Environmental Checklist and found no significant adverse environmental impacts related to the project. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The findings listed on the attached Resolution are support by tl-- following facts: � - 3 PLAWU NG COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 12523/Lightner February 22, 1984 Page 4 a T,ia project site is adequate in size ar-d shape to accc.=odate the development and the proposed single family uses are in accordance with the objectives of the General Plan and Loring Ordinance. a The proposed site plan, it conjunction with the Conditions of Approval, is consistent with the current development standards of tee Cit•r_ IV. CORR ESP O;JOENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing item in The Daily Report newspaper and notices were sent tc property owners wit in sv feet of the subject property. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing and rer:eive all public input on this matter. If after such consideration the Commission can support the facts for findings and condition_ of approval, adoption of the attached Re ;alution and issuance of a Negative Declaration is recommended. ReiRectfully ubmitted, i ck ,om ' it Planner JRG:FD:jr Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan/Grading Plan Exhibit "Cu - Tract Map Exhibit "0" - Landscape Concepts (Lemon. Avenue) Exhihits "E-l" - Elevations Initial S--dy, Part I Resolution of Approval d I � Ali; SITE UTILIZATION ' PROJECT I; I- 1 - i SITE tit .�I I `i 7 al- NORTH CITY OF ITE RANCHO Ci.;CN IQ\GA PL-\�TN'I,\-G Dl-% l.SI'O\ SCALE-. , fi- � ��L .. 11T � .� .w.Y -[i •!'��, .sr,� �awrr VAS CONC EPTUAL GRADING PLAN r i��1-�-, • �. . y xrnar of mom Iff- cwvgr .,w� I E-n, F•, I {� _ 3a { „�. Tr`��r-=ri rF1 ` - I�. ' /t6 ,— {'J�n .rl�ll,' nII�I��•'rsil�• ts�',y i rs =r I C F' 1 � ` Lt, I —/ 1 kl�` . '} ` L_ _ «J � \L•ca� ��:5�--_-.11��4—j,— \\ �'``r I�/�/—\' _ Y al.+P✓ S,Ktf \O. ITY OF .` .NI C,HO C CAN tC\GA TITLE, ��P�� PLC\\ING DIAN ISIOV E-.I HPIT:— �—scat£ �_ _ 114 TRACT 2 -CT 1523 I ._t% r, ✓/CNI/,✓ N// 1 JO .I _ro ll ..c• -•r-• „ne/ tt..o.' ciao. E J a`� '• Jpn—T1 IL ALJR TH v •WOLi 1074 PL INNIN DIN'LIQ\ Etf i ur: e�—.— SCA[.E- P - 7 � �,. ws•ram` ` °'1'�+.� ;$_� �,�,,, 3' .: 'I�I - »t yt a �9 •r� '�A. 1., wts � •" 1�OR PL1`'tiTI\G t7fX'LS1Qt E`HIBIT: DE- - EEI 1 '�rldI I _ [11 J i II 51� I II II Tr w! FORT' t - tOTY OF ITE;I: RANCHO CUCN`iO\G:-\- ~- TtTt.E: PL-x%"N`I\G DIVISION EXHIBIT: SALE: i i� i i \ 1� i L ! + rAt,_. ��r sae Ems.. r.no• • - . _ 1 0 i L ULJO[ *" > -- � rra.rr ELE�nTow1•H' F�`.•• FtLOC Pta•.C.aO _ ✓ V NORTH CITY Or RANCHO CLC N IO`GA TITLE: PLANNING DIVTSIONT E-MiIBIT= :rM jCAL : F-/O e i i 1 i \ I t I i i S.CE EiF-v lE'•i O SG�! •�0.' t1N Y'.FO _I Ell 711�fl1✓Ul_lLJ '��J �==+-�-;fit .----�--- I NORM Aft CITY OF ITEM: I ANCHO C'..CNNNIONG.A, TITLE= y_Va t^cr�!-hS PLANNING DI"', -,--'!ON Eti unlT: SCALE- i \ 1 . .. L CPtR Gov 'L'. e>_ev es.fa ``t'1 �:oe a s•• �.•.�-o K.lAY] G.E� n'.�'o' � --- _r��w.�..s..r......I _..... i �»tiv_^.'p` Cs:•.»'•'L.�- Fca+r ne�a-rf�— NORTH CITY Or ITI-%I: RANCHO TITLE : e PLL\NING Dlv%ISIO\i Ext urIT-_ "_i-' — cCALE=— tltl _ ..i i � carte-.s+r-o: L•f0 ee�.c -�.G Tb.+ q•. g F.SIOG�uva�pr 2.._. I ,...Yij� mil - <- UL� � e roam r�..•.a � n[M CISrTW NORTH CITY 4'F ITL•�t- - 1 R a NCHO CUC.-.`'10-NG:k TITU: PL•+.:\ 1-T'N%Gj IJIt,-Lgo . E\IlllyiT=__SCALE= F= 1,� r, r a f.LM��a•+- �� Li 7 W r.J�.-. � / n...antia�•-.ram �� '1'' I L NCRTH CITY Or ITEM- R,k\CHO CLC A ION:s� TITLE: FL NNING DIVISION EXHISM SCNLE- fy CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Enviromnental Assessmcnt Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this orm must be completed and submitted to the Development •d Review Coimziittee• 'through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Bart II of the Initial Study. The Development Review ConZaittee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Cc=-attee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental i=.;;act and an Environmental Impact Report -,,-,will be preparedf or 3) An additional ihfbrma'tion report should ',, :supplied-by 4 1--e•• "applicant giving further inforsa- Lion 'conczYnn�e the prbpbsei3. project.,- -, , PROJECT TITLE: �5,5"[L�/ [1,1n XL APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE:� =LG 1.4G FITr-�E R PT a NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED s ' CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: S LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) !O � °S�i7E d 1 •.tot,! EASL" c�1 �NfT'atac�p use tlo_ 1,01 - ZXI- 023 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: I-1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: LxTr t1G�,ic L 6- Stt tY( i ot� ACREAGE OF PROJECT AP_EA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE Or EvIST-� i V 11.L PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: g.SS G?zcss "as DESCRIBF THE 'ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING O? THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY. PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SUP-ROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS) : �ro off.. - --.._tea - 5trS4L.o' •'�,.� t�. �S vt : 3 c+� - �a ;7.7 • Is the project part of s larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? (.lo I-2 ,j WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO X 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? - .• 2. , Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? - - - .s 3. �rcate a s•.:.'••st�^tia/ chi o =^ 8e.^�a^.d £c:: ..ng.. municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. ) ? X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan. designations? 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? 5471 6. Create the need- far use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above- MOST- oIE TTaEB S t.•tG o.cBe� wtk �l.�.t.. ttJ 5�7��E1-•- F[.t a t•tT IMPORTANT: If the project involves the constriction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the, statgnents•: furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the faatsk statements,, ,and information presented are true and correct to the best af 'my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be suba.itted. before -aD a4equate evaluation can be made by the Developrient Review Committee: Date f �i �� Signature / y Title �� C 1-3 J1T , 1 RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. LIG►='I?sE� 'fJ6VE1.n�?i+.�Q < GOT�a�ialG Nave of Developer and Tentative Tract No. *io Specific Location of Project: Emsf-T«I 51or- e1:' cSHOIJ - � 5XLD PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PFiA.SE 4 TOTAL 1. Number of single family units: 3� 2. Number of a:nitiple family units: 3. Date proposed to begin t gonsruction:. . `/" 4. Earliest date of > . occupancy: mg Model # and 4 of Tentative S. Bedrooms Price Range i600-C`t� "f, 113 o 1-4 ® RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12523 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12523, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Lightner Development, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a tctal development and subdivision of 9.55 acres into 35 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action, on February 22, 1984; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Pianning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 12523 and .the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not confaict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. (9) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. Resolution Page 2 SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 12523, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: Planning Division 1. The block wall contiguous to Lemon Street shall be designed in such a fashion as to provide architectural variety and visual interest to the streetscape. The wall shall be designed to include indentations, reveals, and decorative details (i .e., tile caps, scored concrete block, wrought iron, etc. ) in addition to extensive landscape features including berminq and street trees. The final deeion of this na.v str:p S h,-il bc_ r•,•• . . . u subject to approval by the City Planner prior to final map approval . 2. A six (6) foot concrete block wall shall be provided contiguous to the easterly property line, adjacent to the existing flood control channel . 3. A variation of roof materials, textures, and colors is required. Roof material samples shall be submitted to the Planning Department for final approval by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. 4. All rear building setbacks shall be 20 feet as measured from the rear property line. Enqineerinq Division 1. The applicant shall be required to join the Alta Loma Assessment District. 2. The final tract map shall not be recorded until the Alta Loma Channel Assessment District is formed, or appropriate replacement of the existing channel with a concrete channel including adequate inlet and outlet structures is bonded for or installed by the applicant to the satisfaction of the C:tv Engineer. 3. Lot drainage devices along Lemon Street shall drain through an under sidewalk drain, per City standards. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22nd DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: s,. Rick Gomez, Deputy ecretary Resolution Page 3 I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the 'Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of February, 1984, by the following vote-to-wit- AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: CO:!VISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: vi „L NCw C— �JP -✓ L G d u •O V L O Q d .Li. O V L C O w V C �E" c i—r_ ✓ T ` oa Apr � w .o i � G�= .ar. Vu _TC = 09 ✓_^ A ✓r— ^ c qq N� GV A� 27 N 1 � - 1 ^ L C d ^ — 3 � -•N D r.—. � G O O w = O L N •N'p G C. � � pr �� —O A q U ✓ q 9 � �u �� u�-- > _ L 1U00. Gam.•. .V.. J C 'c^J Nl C-� T� — C2 A_ G— •9 V •'. N F „ C .v G O u a A O C V V i S` oq �"w -- � c ✓—�_ i own _D^ a�� o" °' mp m A v c c _ V s- �C•r'O oC_O. G4V c0 f G V Gq d l✓ � — -_ — - CN✓ � � G � NJV .c y L G L N O u N C� C L A V q� ' C^�L ✓ OL C 9� �_s 9 C N j •L L C O N d q�C _ D � V� � C c �G r N q d r ✓ C M N --� P� l V✓ � G_V._ Sr.A d�r ASCc L GCL C— TN J � O Pu ` 00` d✓ d TL ✓� ✓� _O Pc N u d �G l•• c O LN •' N • O N O C .Gn C•—.. — G O 7 d O l r O — 2 N O A 9 C �' A sL ea qN cTG oo _ �. SJ C ,U J O L pr C•• l.p. r Cp+� ,. � _ L.= 9 V >c— ... COi TG O✓�nE N > F —ram ap�w — L .g.. T N e �O J 'n o N G G �_O u '_ ? O/ V 2 N c o 6 G w p V O E - S r q C w� � N • 40 V A P ✓ — 9 N C✓ O q G V C_ ✓ _ „G L 9 N V ~ £ L O 4 n.- O C090 GVD 696� 2 4JpV RNO.D RA.�m Qp �6M —M6 �•L n0 • O >.Gn T— TV.r Gl �c � ✓` d r d W G Ep V C O N OT ✓rp A CCu Ni- 1 r �,1j",^� �I LP �-69 SOQr ^—� q7 V9 �—. •'n .Ji. ^it � t V I.•S OI — C >^ E O O V 9 w _r � n D � � C L �� r V� � V C• UNk = C � d D� �C'y- ^_ C V C A 9 C ` 9 V•... �V 2 O O yr C N� �� SrG V FV C.nA O\Nw OPC PCr 0. u �.� q_ _ C `• —_ C_ T aa-w .r G O u t a. C y C � C' — ✓ � C �'. 0poc Z:z L a r G L p r q O• � O 6 V✓ • U V O � C O E' __ • > N __ N •f� C� rl • n � x � 5 Z a = i I Q q ✓✓ U_ = T✓ Nb_ L ✓ a'u[nlil VCL`=V� Lr V � ` •. W r C •�SJ �r F O O O d C > b 7 C_-J V P u U V L✓ q O ` ` i N ~ ^ R f Gr _ ^`_N A C T^ y N > N A O • G _ pV✓ _ ✓ � q9 o-. CL LVq� Ln FAO, i E V �'VA. 06" EjV O- ✓� w.�.� Cld .. rL ✓ C n✓ q E c � r `Cyy G6�� p✓� >r _� A '. `, SC C. 0 q� C � CC Q � � ✓ U �1. ` '� E E � f C V O c n a A 9 A 2 G r A_ C O L G C C' 7 V a .�✓^` C .n E- ✓V. c� i o_V C V 9 A y C' = _ L' n d V V V` ^ O O C.L O.� � ✓ O"d O V r d j <� L V CCrt. ` ;L CLVO V� r'� aiVC ✓ Ov- 4 q NrCO 9 ` O .. •O r V F t .� ._.. C F Q L'� i V < L O L V F. u D C. .n n✓ O.C' y T L Y i c G C y I �-✓ r r.N G L S l� L r M [ = V � C� 6 d O F CCc 1 .' LUQ rC.V.. � - .CO V _ �_ OVT✓ q O L -N� � O t ✓ d ^ �� i A N C .`p V C c C� L> 'L � r S A U O ✓V - L � n � L�q O p0 _' O � �E a E C r� V� n v �`b+r C O •l N c.��• i A u ✓ �C N A __N V > M P O u A O A � C .e `�✓ u u.O.r n V V 7 C < N O C- N - n_-� � L✓ _ i C L 6 q _ L F - 7 r E 9 r0 �� G y N= 0✓� a n C q' T� q C. � C t p „✓ A 9 C O C�Z o 'u. n r V N C L ` 6 L L 9 O 'rJ q O,r p y N -�F U ✓ ,a_ E G J O C L V � ^ i U O � O✓_D y g 4 N L O Q V CA NU A00 V. L.-u.OrS nq �J`L pl? E � OLr�� -rLOt V� �i�r ON �L ✓a 'aN= ✓?ccc N a ✓ VcrAo n = ..:oN a.o n--- a'� �� r « d c C.L+a 'o oc ` i_ cN- F A� i✓.c,. .✓.c o:� N-�� N ✓ v _1 c`— Cic c svt tZ V m1 p O 1 O N a b^ j _ ✓ C O C N �_ r _ L V pi d✓.r ' .O L - G V g C q-_ L r L �✓ a � r L O O N ' j f > C Y O✓ 9 � L✓ U ✓V r ? n J C U G6 T d�J F-_✓ GV F r C L�p V L y G i_ LOO O.i C.- E V rN `� C •d „ V V L � P6 �. r O L O O y O u S i CVi �'•� U q •' T i c L A y ' L C c✓ > c C N 9 ` A E = O •, _ O L C. O^ '�'C 9 O O y V N U M - O ti,G N= uL VC VO�Ny .ri.0 712 Osr q7c j L.r > P Vt�Oj 9� C 5 rM - 9 V 6V Nc o o_ cc `'•— o A L '" o� 'c c :_� c 4 L✓ O { � " >' v� cYOC.O..�- COOV = 0•J.� LO $ " NO = o q S V � ' C 'J V G '-" E r O O✓ U� rn S � O G� n V C•2 > ,Wn C• VCL . A n V � rnC CL CpN = = C� LC S > P CnCC C C L`•C C U _Lc VG-C p Lc. 4L - ` V � nq U6V a. C7 M ✓�. 0 C jLC' 4 � PV `." CCOr✓ .eC M NNO ✓ _ C - iJ o orc co vc cy `G_ ca c c`.? r.c `cooN vo c c�-' c� `a's L.— c? : s' — �+r > c-- 'c„a•_> N.= a,c. n^ ✓I _ _ _ " Leer o .n 'vOA Cyr G_lvM tC.� ' c.. 9y L O9 PLr^.� Q «G N 9 2 -✓ V C V.-... L L _ C. .. ✓ c..C. - N - r L _ O Z 6 V ✓o GN P- r✓> _ c1 Nc r G L: c_ c - o - oD aft .Ner ip '✓-D- L `- _^T•� YLx7 Mc Gc •co iNao ✓ N o C r C O U✓C 2 V = 9 J� V V C T 6 M•J Y 1 < � •o C G G O. N __ D� d ✓ O 'CC n TJ cJ O G j N v. _ Q.- a J6 D nqiCZ �' V •n a. G C. V q V EN C r L G ✓ d S _ ✓ V O U D L C � C U� _ V '¢ •r O G_ F`� >• N d N U •' -L L C O N G Zz✓ ✓ O L L V 1 V 9' N q N V C ✓ C a C N M G✓ a P Q a C Gp N r L ' q L N Pr N r a l C.VL O G O V L 9 V G W ` d C E g C 4 T _C•Jr ✓ q L ✓ r✓= C� - > -? CLG q0 T✓ N M✓✓ c ✓. P=C '_ ' CF •¢ C C O- q L• � N^✓- U 4 T C T p � ? C 4 'V G C N- 4 J � 4� 4 C >• O L a t C_ E - �/ L T D� C< � C - > E � O N - pc q o NN utic mv� gr. co ".-✓ cG d 6nC OC < � rC i�na aJ.�� N c Sri ✓LE� � A� e= <Gp Otpi u P d V G P L n d� 4q d•r q L - p t• 9 L u C q -_ N e i✓ - C q t 2 _ � C G G L O N 96✓ •'• � nV� Op N GOOC 7 G ~LJG is > O GM nJC Nedra L Q �Iq n✓ P O '-"'G G� Q'C_` � G�q G� L 4.. C T V d N �L L L ✓ e E C V J L~ J _ ~� > n o ••'.� � ^ Er OO PCp PND_ ...N n LO_C ~ Napi C� ¢. G'C Cy C' i l V G lPr� g0 P= '• P Mc N =L L� c N�. c--q c.`.a ,-c no t c-_�_ � od C - - __ •o C N r V N q q d C J rn T O C i V C C ` i ` 9 G � .[• _ _ G 9 G _ N d C- c u ._..u•.C Gr < < C V� LL... _. 0 LGNC GTC OD ✓ OT C G✓ T 6 � > ��' N '✓ r 'JO __.7�_ �a '� OC� p C2O � `GEV Va C_ q V p C` •` _ C 4 �a L_ O L. O � C .Lj 22 f C" A V > O✓ U C T- C ^ L r t G G ✓ •r'.. T O L C C_ ✓ C ✓J > c ✓ o �Tr• � G . G.. J c °' - e �- < .%'y c ✓ c^r _'. c'._• G Yo oc - vc ¢ r.�• rn�� Y1a I..✓ T ✓ G _ C < T r -C c r C' M u u -•. i ✓ - oa`G• .a� ,¢7r � N cG .moo per 4 <9 � O •Ci•Lq fl <NG� W6 •nC GSN� N qN 6N- <> 6n2Nda C' V q tt 1• � b0 2 V C G V G+- .. nN C C V L C l.Z :rL Ce'n^,^ O �G i. r, V•e P Y= G C-m -v <_ C i ✓ - `a, L✓ V V V = q �a_ •e � d r G O d P .] T^P V y L a d 6 � .Oi. C ✓� ^r L G �. F L] Vic... c aLu•o c. o _ _- Gv'o po.o✓✓ q� - ✓_ c LL '°r• ✓. -o.u" _,.� :roc oy Vbo pcsn-. c 2- N` d q`':• p = o n E p= V Z o M u c v Lo J o r.N. :i "✓LN =�= cm w (on aui _- io o'°E' 'r c•.L- �c� o P= rnc. p O a C N V O- l r� F dI `• N G. W b r, O 7 t] O O N 6 a O y P Gb C ✓ N > U ✓ yE .Pe ✓ � ¢ yN P✓ Oy „ PE VdNq � N L.O LC .�.7 qNO - V. _-✓I 9 � �� b PN � -..r OP C. c [4n' GL � n6l�v. n`= ��o N .`.I o.va •..-p.o •.•'ram �c ai� �zc t. < rn.. c�b.•�o � y C I ✓ I _ C C y � N � C _ O V � C L 2 � � I � L C! q p �� '•'� b09 I I a -c, v a✓n = e _I cc .... N... I - < ` ten � o�y'o• i o= "= cvp- I ✓I c � a = w L q m (-' O 7 ` L - � c v C v p c n V y � q^ n.Q V O j of L_ _ I cL W =. Ob E l �' > C� V C S � 1` ✓ C � > u L C .'O•� �O i C "" O O C 4.- y i C�Z .n C •�•w� N G � � �� ` L✓=� ~ � Q ? n OG.' L� C 1 O C— n .L.._ 'a O q � ✓ G V C d C _ ._ _ •- IJ✓ V —� m � T C I q r d ✓U O — _ q ✓ y� 1 a — 2 I bC .,• Cl OGN _ _ NCB �OJR nt uQ= ✓ F R. CC C I y✓T ✓ .tir" G ti I 0 4 L•_V =y. i N „ q� J �✓C V .. V A C a d d V� O � C�U V M C✓ C ✓ � V' C `O _ c cc V V p✓ TY � F �V 2 T V V PNC —_ C L y L C�. � T T 1 — P f l C L C G� 3;.+ C N •'" 1� L 0 L U V C O U' C, EI 6a,u r< n✓ 6 I ZL.rNG � C �VUL • yl � cl .I Y; _ n' _f dI � I 1 V U• U�� l A 9 idrn ^� a � N y oN� c �- � c •� .n c 9 M N 6 t 4 Q. � V O G .` _ � I I _ oc- o � p L O �• r C ; ci N I L LC ap nN _ C I .r I O L 1 e '^o o - '^ : ' d .•� o c y d ,,, e_ eG 1 L:m I i I t ��► L � I � �� n yV p 09' .o.' Lnc c�ni �= o i co ;\ 1 j� Pao uzo 0o m ., oi c♦c- - I ¢- L � ^ ' a m ` x q c ? L t : L T tVa _ - � "tea s :. o:' .. °✓' ca � _ �•- c r _ s � _✓ I I I I I c ✓ G N '✓ A A ^ A O P O p L _ N S � • v V C- d C ci� 2 •Oa d ¢ fG O ' L > 1 aN ~ 1- c .._ `v.� �• .n N�cam hL' I a�i_ I - a � J✓<r_ .nv �I .W.• u x= eT y✓! '"�-' I I I '° L'` I G - L- '+^ 6 N _- L d E"i ✓ P N = J C y u I U J C rnOC ✓•CT Oru P- t0r vO � CiN d Sr 9 E 2 d O c N C L O J I I ' a ` •`.9 .d.=� iLG.d.✓ ? o - M W -gym � G I d A r c'dm �a x_ csc - LO - P?y _ �- ? � ins ✓ jt� .^ Ld C i9 IO V _ � N✓ a vb N W _ A� CrA Gr- rdL VO T 0 �I I It r~r .". N y i L = C a m N L^✓ O a L u N � O r K C V i L d.� ` C d 4 V ` Q d T L C.� p O�.• L I L V 0 6 9 S m L C A a > C > A V P I 9 C ✓ � d 7 .n O_ }.i i:c V O_ �c N L C•a•• � i � G p a r N L O N O i q O c a y I <'- l T c A r A �� C O 1 I C rn ~ ~ yGc NLLNco OL OOtO C O' •{ qQ A C' y l iL✓ 6i.G > �Lr C FS VEViV -'Ou a ✓ 0 M q u•� L C ^ u C �` d C d C p�0- L O B O L �n •- C �. C C O N �. � � ` d 1. V V �•'� N • y d ^ a l O O O O 2 VC� O~ LC C¢' � .�e i0= QpO OTC L' •d d -Y�-�� i rn p u. r dy PV¢ C4 ��C- A �_ 6iT ¢p 6r� .. _ri ONr ✓4V _- N� � � d �/'1I I-` O^ C y. CC- n � TOr CN^ram Ti N_ `.nc i ..�.�Vr OLO' L ✓ C �-_ C• _CCN ✓ � .V V= y �_I CC Ct+� NI 1 dt i0. VDS� pdAY NOu� >.YeC r_� N -N GC`. �.V+ ✓ A C J I �AL pf~n M ✓' V`JN CnAC C' p'~- �� l rGOL < OV VU P^ C� y V < V� 1 I1/�'f� c• � CI OJ\ `ci ci 1 I ul .+ 0 0 S � q _ ! a - p w ••`• cop I r E w OW _ � s v ^" x•' a Ct ` 3 �VI�\I 4 me _ d O V I <<U C.C � C' f 6 U I a t C �� ✓ L q N L L r. �_C n G d � D Y m q V✓ O q _✓ C O L '� I D O N d I � d O. �'Ay Y �j=L q .JI_ O Qo qco � r ✓ iso 'u U V I V T✓ n ,J y ` 1� C O YI, a d Y V ✓ P D L u liz m' L I ✓LQ qj N✓ d0 d �IVW � O ' Np Nu C O O_La Gi OV 2 �Iggm �I_r�=a �Or uq =:' ` I O.T 4Zu yP HI - rar CLN q .Ji. uL O �N✓•S� �r � I �1 6r 6NJ Q� C'I O I I ^I 1 o o� c _moo I _ o d Gi ". gym r^ .c Lo ona 10 r `NnN IC. ~ p L_ O .^ Our NC O N Y O N L r l V O f V 6L q to c' r c qL q Y Yri.� r f .2 K 6_ _ •' O r C NL Vdu N m W a O Tm p � II>� =. PO dL pEm ✓ Vy OL Cr N O Ir rFA L_ On GT_✓ Y Lp.O. N � ✓u q0 D NV y V V u ✓ C C Y N` •. L I I O 00 CA.1 a. O VC rpr P[ p6q =-0 uC. •n � V Ou✓ � c��ni � q � C O_ m ` qm GT.yv �_ CL _ ✓ ` J ` P.ui. i C✓s - L p `On CV�U•_ _ q � vC _. 6 r lqD Q� tV O '+ — mu ✓ mTL G.vuZ m � a CO � _ � •.r O I �.. ` ✓ L n� C` cL' c. r TN `_ � d T_ f m N L o c c _ _ �_ _ — r •Lu a. ��. �L L_u ac Lac Yc, Yy a_ ✓�Lc. `:.= aW ✓ c PSG<Tn N_ �Ln • O TV J _ � C V ` W Ty ✓ t r � 'r� t ^ — G. C Q p U Npw.Ce _ •'n va_ N _ L L i .n _ `L Cq Cr L�O✓ O NV L.rr Qy p� yr NI LV 3C U7 • • it N _ .p •�I m P �I '• N r z Y V Ql '7 � O G n v u r,y c < o n I I I c�- - u.� ._ _ � A '- a I � -.'�M - o c .,• _o r i v .�. .ce � <. c �� o I _ _ A n - ._ a ,,, .. _ ` R C n y I I I 9- e O ... _ ✓t Y. � � I E I W V �n G �— W r j a � � � l � of - r _ 4 - � � V Q _ �_ G U I y �_M �_ y i w.N _ r U I i C .O .� ~n '^o'er : � ' � f � �s c y C �� 6 r C l C.i I I � �r N O '_ _ ` `V _` E p4 n= I I O .n C m � n _ C^J � C_ O r � G ` �-.t N 9 �I � N V > � O Y I C V L C' C C �'� y C M� C i� � I � O C L G U C Ova �' C 1 ql i' i //V��,rr�I O i i �y � C� �..r O V C - I I �t C 4' ✓ 9 G— � r CST "' � � G 2 — C L n O � O �� r.. . _ . �� . � I I I _ �.� �` — — 4 - - � q as �r � i - - -u > c.r vl � ... 1 acc.-. - � = c t � S .I - of cc � I � � �_ °; i _ _ V - _ c c•_ ��. � I _ �o oi_ - u [5'i �i�.�i. cc c ` pc u� � � c� c �•� 4—N O^ 1rp Q6 � I I 4�VG \ �I . � � � 1 �� NI � � 0 CITY OF RANCHO CiJCAMONGA GL,G�tip STAFF REPORT �x- ci 6 r' 7- DATE: February 22, 1984 197 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner $7; Lan Coleman, Associatc riail�,cr SUEJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 83-44 - SUPRACOTE - The construction of a ev,uuu sq. ft. warehouse addition to the existing manufacturing plant on 16 acres o� land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8) located at 11200 Arrow - APN 208-351-12. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action R?auested: Approval of site plan and elevations B. PurFase: Construction of a 29,000 sq. ft. warehouse C. Location; North side of Arrow. east of Maple Avenue D. Parcel Size: 16 acres I E. Existing Zoning: General Industrial District (_ubarea 8) F. Existing Land Use: Manufacturing Plant G. Surroundin Land and Use and Zoning: North - Warehouse; General Industrial (Subarea 8) South - Vacant; ninum Impact Heavy Industrial (Subarea 9) East - Vacant; Ceneral Industrial (Subarea 8) West - Vacant; Industrial Park (Subarea 7) H. General Flan Designations: Project Site - General Inoustrial North - General Industrial South - Heavy Industrial East - General Industrial :vest - General Industrial I. Site Characteristics: This site has been developed as a steel coil manufacturing and warehouse facility and the lard has been graded and partially paved. ThF existing building: are prefabricated metal , as shown on the enclosed photographs. ITEM G i 1 PLAMING COMMISSION STAFF REPCRT Development Re�riew 83-44/Supracote February 22, 1934 Page 2 J. Applicable Reoulations: The industrial Area Specific Plan permits light wholesaic storage and distribution within Subarea 8. H. ANALYSIS: A. General : The Project has been designed in accordance with the industrial Area Specific Plan requirements. The conceotual grading Plan has been rPviawPri and amen.- k. th - -rr• _) c nr 0u1ny Committee. The Engineering Division is recommending ;.hat the westerly and easterly drive approaches be reconsi:ructed to City standards and tr.at a :meandering sidewalk be installed along Arrow Route, consistent with the Special Boulevard character. b_ Cesign Review Committee: The Committee recommended approval of the site plan and elevaticr,s subject to providing landscaping and mounding along Arrow Route, planting a dense landscape screen along the east pru�.�,v line to screen the gas recycier• and miscellaneous equipment, and repainting the existing building to match the new building in a subdued earthtone color_ Appropriate conditions have been included in the attached Resolution. C_ Environmental Assessment: Based upon the Initial Study, staff has found that no significant adverse impacts will occur as a result of this project. iIi. FACTS cOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent i °th the Industrial Area Specific Plan and General Plan. The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use and building design tocether with the recommended condition; are in compliance with the Industrial Area Specific Plan and City standards_ IV. RECOMMENDATION. It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider al materia'. and input on this project. If after such consideration the Commission can support the facts for finding and conditions of approval, adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Resplctfully,x,pbmitted, Rick ome .,..-_-_- City Planner P :DC:jr PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Development Review 63-44/Supracote February 22, 1584 Page 3 Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Photos Exhibit "C" - Site Photos Exhibit "D" - Site Plan Exhibit "E" - Elevations Initial Study, Part I Resolution of Approval with Conditions I I f s rOOTHf_L tt s t � � T 4 n nc+ w M � h L' V \ORTI CITY OF ITE%I= ItA- L- CHO CLCANIO\GA TITLE: PLAN\I.\G DI`-ISIO EXHIBIT- Y _ tea„w A �+. � '� Y� .� < f :.r��C'�.:e•r�C-a-.. M� 'a yJlS�• :w , ,r — ' le�I✓' Ar•� r• r -ice R �' _ .;ry, .._- .tip ✓ ��.. 1 � 1 I r / Y _ ��'tr�.'._x�/!.. ;`;-� h'f'L?�r'. ,..!„y^t .yrR.r-<v,•w-}._ � �'tiwe '� i ' S r i IW i • -�. Q. sl - P 1 7.1 lj oo.... ': .. li •;�h��! i~i Illl I �IIIII� �� / �•C ,1�I�rr....w 1 (G attune?wP ZOO�aM-�fCY TY/. I •� V NORTH CITY Or ITE\I: sz;5- ® RANCHO CUC:- NIO\GA TITLE= PI.rVNNING >t3R ISUN E-XHIBrr:--,_SCALE- 6 - 7 19 ' � (a 1 li� � I ! I I 111 �g� I.i•I t 1., �,�I �i in lu O cS•�' I i ii 3 , 3 C tpj ilyl. I g � U .:: it I L • e { � � �a4 � 1 r I I £��/�is �' '+�� ^L j;0�'i •'�.ai '{ a G v I i 2' �•N 11 di� `m � M I � i c� a:• m< ag ' wry i;•._ 1•I �L,j r i I I � I � j •�i 1. .•.I Ili I i i ` .I -. _—� I L 1 1 I I I I I I •� ] d _ � ��I 9' I/ �{Iif .5-f Tr CITY OF R;uNCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORM�,TION SdEET - To be completed by applicant Enviror:,ental Assessment Review Fee: $87. 00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department vnere tat-- project application is made_ Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part IT_ of the Initial Study. The Develop-nent Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at whic': time the project is to be heard. The Committee wil "' make one of three determinations : 1) The project w1i have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Supracote, Inc. APPLICANT 'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE:� ��n -- 11200 Arror Hwy, Cucamonga, Ca. l NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: MOUNTAIN VITTd 3r'-Tri^mac rnlr 2619 S Waterman Ave_ Ste "D" San $errarrinn �, o _ LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) 11200 Arrow Hwy, Cucamonga, Ca. LIST OTHER PEP-MITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS : I-1 i e. PROJECT CESCAIPTIn t DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Steel coil warehouse storace ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS. IF ANY: proposed h,_tilc_^_g i nn --O- so - it. brace is 5 acres . Erist_. cinc i ; , o,1 so f DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORnATI_ON ON TOPOGRAPHY, PUNTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, Ah^' CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES FIND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS) : Existing site has been graded and partially paved. 5 1' sLrucZural D Cg$ . ana the a b nc Uarron anc_ No Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of emulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? 1-2 x WTT.T. TNTG PROJECT: YES NO x 1. Create a substantial change in ground -- contours? 2. Create a substantial chance in existing noise or vibration? x 3. Create a substantial change in demand for -- municipal services (police, lire, water, sewage, etc. ) ? x 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? x 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flarmables or explosives? Explanaticn of any YES answers above : IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. II I CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best cf my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation. can be made by the Development Review Committee. Date Signature Title 1-3 �_�/ RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 83-44 LOCATED AT 11200 ARROW ROUTE IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL ZONE WHEREAS, on the 12th day of January, 1984, a complete application was filad by Supracote, Inc. for review of the above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of February, 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above-described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed; and 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and 4. That the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and Industrial Area Specific Plan. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on February 22, 1984. SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 83-44 is approved su3ject to the following conditions and attached Standard Conditions: 1. Remove and replace existing A.C. pavement south of office, including five (5) parking spaces adjacent to curb, with undulating berms and landscaping as shown on the proposed site plan. Berms shall have an average height of three (3) feet and have a maximum slope not to exceed 31/2 :1. Resolution Page 2 2. The landscaping proposed along the developed portion of Arrow Route shall include minimum 15-gallon size trees planted a maximum of 0 feet apart, shrubs to screen parking areas, and ground cover. Plants should be selected for low ;maintenance and low water demand. 3. Water and energy conservation techniques, such as drip irrigation and alluvial rockscape, are highly encouraged. 4. A dense landscape screen, including tall trees and shrubs; shall he plants? .alnncn the oast nrnporty line to screen equipment. This shall be accomplished within twelve ( 12) months from the date of this approval , or prior to occupancy of the .eater treatment building, whichever cores first. The extent of the landscaping will be determined after the repainting and clean-up of the east side of the building. 5. The existing building, including the gas recycler, shall be repainted in subdued earthtone colors to match the addition. This shail be accomplished in conjunction with the constru::tion of the addition. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22nd DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a reoular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of February, 1984, by the following vote-to-tint: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: a NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: r.' Q•O..V T C C O C q_C C i. b O•L.. t r C D e c ,f D G y` O V C a n ca.a3 _ off - �� -' •'� > �r.. m Nc-A.n �h ` ea >`ci N C � V_q S n ✓D� _ a d 4 T 'G) � vou ✓_�u .' on yFW w� A v^�_ r rn cq, z DJ AO G -� P GO_ d C� NCv CL Yd d � C- n p, � iN u4' u U. �.+ .� 2-N� „� i P•D.. 6'�Nrn. � 6iJ LA d=L C q G> C n C '^ C O p �` O c O,'C C N q✓ C A- A C Y OC•'1 =C✓ r V �6_ O C_ q 00` aCnc N� i✓ O ✓�j N^� A aDo uPpi AL,✓ � pr pL•Ll _ N > E a�� Pc GiO1 ?` yi a c`o�« oN wr. � 'J�Nv .:, iiNc o4� o A �Wo cry v✓v � Y � N y i' VN_ - AP pFb =^ .ow r� c4 o Pc o!�-y'c � n icN pD > ic9= _ W � V. u C ✓ V G A N ✓ V O 6 •�_ � �_ V C�^� O GO 'Um dySl 6AO.Ln 6 = nV 6M6a GCVm 4a ^ 6N —Nn F'L NO aw c F i `n � � Yi' cW Nv A.no .I - M ? N CDC ubiO „ C ' q„ ryC C F \� V HOC Q•di cN 6n✓ rC �y NVC 6 C O O .' C A `N dLA -O - �I — 00J = Aga y r,! N VIA OL= G.Li, Go c` 4 p✓� CC` ONt O •`• C L 'n C Y '•M W C ^ Oi 0 ds✓ Z. rC i Y r A r S O P {1 v � _• c o o c b c c 4 C N n ✓ N N N ^q N ✓ C.u q C M` i A V CGO -L-L - �✓ Ac V C� 6 C, q • a O _ aGV o �� N 4 O �V ` w J C M JC✓ I NI r�\ 1 Y C Vim'I d i -. �. D M C q� C L = �= w O O .O...Lc'•. �`M T✓ O V d y.a q P q V P 'l Y'd ` > C w f O G Yi O C L✓ 9 O i w✓ � c, ✓ ^L '- c .n C.N.. `' F � � ._ _ P9 re j m , p ra• V V a •n V C r 6 .n r! C w c V p a av A V M L q ` O 6 ((��[ ✓ E Vy✓ `^2iV _ - N •w Vq^ 0= arr Y _'=•" VLL ` O �' 0Y' OGIC VV O �a - p C ✓ _ ^�` `^ '-" awn. L_' Nt ✓ - n •_ ^ _ C ^ yam cOT Nr r Cc Q ti r n - Y' 90 d �-' � E N`FO L_T�� .a =.- a.•CY w �y� C y r_ Lu .rf l d i A C V - v D C•_w^ V e. C l�L rVi. w n � rn V ^-`r _ y Lr,. Yan a�_. _� .. •.D e._ e.= w�Yn� "n-off � qQ c, q cN ci _• _ V c a �_ - csT+ c ' � oo-Ld c✓ ` - � anAu .°,.�^ vY L >_ � i c o > cy� ' :• .^i.D Sam _ E cN� .✓ o' _. �. d v = = c �a ic,- _ a .. o.•'.. No ` oong c_ o✓ >`_ .u. L� O � _te a k ' -�✓ ^ C a > Y � d 0 r' n a o a� C y.'-q `� n C A C c c _ - v O� '- g S O u ✓.i.a �L Y� ^ O _ q w 7 -J O Q �1 V L CNC7 CO.V.r D-�Np � U `-•GCa ✓ _ _ r✓ aOOCc 'Vn pa" A N� N g V V n > V N 9 O r q 1�� y✓ L A _ S C V L`o= .,: "- L�: y.c c✓ ^' o n�- y cFwY-• ��oL " y r-. Cc_ Lie g V o o a N �`= orD' qGa==✓c a c e,an �_ �e o o�� •%r„ r - .Li. 0 O r � TJ- VO n gLIa�D G✓ ^mil: ^'L^� VN r ^ LY rSV c -_ N'O _ - L=`_ -.= off.= ar-''o= F o > __ '� `a` q c �.✓ „1 a � '-� x•o .c^ - � od NON= o o- _ dc-aYc ;yam - ¢, tea^ W S o CO_^_ C .O. ✓V _ N V O V u .F O'- y w O j L�` __ l_ N� ^ CU '^ ?r�C t .0i�� uaLq L .ci wy� ^Td NCCq L0- �. " o ei=1✓< C C 6 E r 6 �L G O L G p p+ S r g N L�- p�y g G A 2 v� l C F- N y q i._ ii az•w,. I{` O 1 r` No yF.' ITN �y q AQ -TAaAng w�..r d_ Ca__ AJTa a OY d✓aN r}w q L Y t ✓V O C G O c a O V W a w q O q ✓✓ d✓ r LAr n a- t VLOoq �.N. Y V.e.�t y' � cq Pa ` moo �` Lo - cC�an- o ^ E_ s: � c� cc c A L :r-u'• c •nrNi a O_ _ _ O V - 7) O✓ Gy` A = gyDCL V ^Ov d ^ NCOA V r= Y C C U •e_ � Y -i _ _ � G� ` d C"I O ^ p c C `J N � A c c d ✓ q Y f, w w O T V O � � A � � C _ L C v�L Y.•' O C^ N L C V C C C 7 d q �-J � L N r C C' ✓ O � t Y C V !�. Pao G .l. _� n q Y., N Y ¢C✓`t. C n L. 'O O G ^ V im ! n_ C.' O Y A C Q i L Nx.. ✓ a . d a- L c d ,. =� -' cc-L• � NON N uc 'V^ Y 'L-' a ---a c O,SGC VAS DL � � 4 C- Oac > N� >`C LC C� _ fJA ✓ q Q�YD NSC 4V ��C Ga e� P� �.'.rY �nC •a 46r 6V a r� N Q� ccr 0 ' C� y i U L c_ `ate r n .no c�a• i ui � Nr o c = c PG- r V. `. e ✓ ca � :.�Oi c 4u `a' �, a�. c`.. J p✓ -' n` A .ate o' " o � c < < `• �� L� � r O 6 O r_ �• r T c y c _ .- C •Q V 7 l V C r �. •n 9 .� n E- LU •� n` �t � �PVi `✓ G=� OE rVO G— � T qU Gq ✓ � C U __ EL C_ V. .e C✓ n G. E V r n 7 d L r w � 00 O u L C •� r PO nGi >rT USG .- Ci. G VONE ~ O pie g i G P ory qr N� qp o- o _^••> uc c �. � cL n. c p No 4 o L P✓_L _ mC �. cs4. 'n qo d_:_' � � �r_�� aNi- >' oc ci Ecv :: E r �` > q O >� 9 L✓ S E �— y� L O V_ N O. c1�J� COC NGn J 9 -ocG co LNo - —C O d t L V V a C^ q�=y c ✓ C G c N _- - ..= oc 2 .-a✓ .- Naar NNq s J Z E�E uo c .o� 0 i cn IIf q= qnE =04 dq yuPq c > � gao`i✓ o �Gy c bo c L c4a G•' = O r c g r V P ✓ T V r L d O V'v V P g U ry _- c O V '�— c_r Q O P V P_ - •'O O' L V -•� c ` N`o c N �:�i Pad n'FQ= 4qh u� s PE C O � Q CUnC E_Ln _d ^r!� r VC C q0 q ✓ D N ✓O O y g q �^ d L P O l O. P � E ✓ � qC NOOgc V � C` Ca: q Pco n` ELi LE ✓ C'.— { � — CC C Y' NOCE qCL — TC QL VC Irrq- C CYAN Gr— C2 OLN r � ✓ dV dLP N Er Crr w' CO^` v ` Ip ✓ CL ` yVd .� C• 4 •� C y � V Cj ru q _ O .f — d ^n 00 � i � V� <r✓ ' n✓ C �' M QrL .may=er yr r L r G C ✓ ^.r q C � V a C C'_'..J G N V ` v `C I ur � V L yr L� cGCu' qE - .rn4' Z.- � r� N rn� �Cm — V � �— NCr V_ ✓ GC mgLN O N cr ✓. O�. P N C ✓ C V V.0. � �✓ 4. :i y V G� O c � � n�M L N F C N r V r r.. u ✓✓E O C'. __ = rC. f .�^-ir� C I. � L P j ♦ � � a V O C — N C P P o' c 4 t r r ` _ 1`r O P C C C("r ` cs c <c �`o � G c1 aNn.' rid �..onsN-rr. c" 4 6 . 14O N VI N N N — E u c_ � G y c �o o c _ o G G✓ � L i T � '7 - y E G G � = O a lOi ✓ � y� � O OJu T Ur -. G >< _ _ n✓ t dJ 6fJ�V, d- _j�G v „i 6VJ 4J - vVV Gp U� GS"r Q 'SV\4v-r � 0 � Y 1 G_ i 3 = ✓C` ✓ O f � >� = Gq C V �✓ G -. C V C` J V J-' r �- I i a cG •� G Gc I� 1 o�G� E n � { N 1 V G V Q j j V ✓_ y y sr El 71 _ p N= _ <a ..o L r cola ]: G � � G� ono c- •'- _z .. c '.__ .� J � • �-' O U ✓ G C r c O O 6 _ G L• � 9� O O� O > G_ i O ✓ G i_ C G C e n v C' <•,� � O CG V- ' I V J V C C' ✓ . r N r• N ,O �. rr a _ tfr 'J� �V 1 = O a C.J ^� G _ _ ZL ` �J I �j U • ." N G � C T c G N InV.• U 7 _r N C C 5 G A — G 6 L I I � I X I i C'_ r Vr 4 I Y�>t� a l b V� ✓J Y d '_ E S > V = 1 W Y 1 1 C 2vOP y N q V i N V T p I c t gv > CO CII PO y Y OT 66 II ' N I — a, � y _rT• `L C_.n+ � L 'J r r .. II O ` yr HE4V Nv NI UV c E �.�� Sao I � i I c = I 9 "A^JY JCG _ _ r r Vr VY� Car r 1 b PO I G^ ' u 6 A Y U^ � V d k- u ^'•a <� C r =I V IJ I I � •CA I C.O. 6Lp < Vr 6A 6RL WS � VAgN¢ 6t V^' _ � I I 10 - s A t-+ 9 C .�-• A E VTaP N C�— V < .0.• Cn cN 'O � E — CV I N - � cav 2� .-ic.,, C _ a io � `po ` b •Ti i ,To _ N 7 c _V n C 7� q`� c O— � y L r V O _ O 11 9 ✓a -"• o II m= c u o o ^' _ - ^ Vj Lea ._G - EA V arrr Or L u T A V !6 A G l "O ` .7_ CA � C' CNII _ bIA1QI G l .ter• _O q—C b � V� _ C 4 r� _ V''� _ a — i Q AC OC C an O� tP+ COC VV OC. i C- � r_ n•� __ N I C T b b Tr C� V� �a� .i• _ G O'^ G P C _ c N E O _ �V'CN < A •oC V N b nC _r Vur ur =• Y. ci < �� 1 11 i� �= r �. L£� I l i n O< G 9 c i A• dO — VO C• CI C' cj ` 1 zo � i do 7.. c I _ c - _ I 9 0 =• `�o' ^y� ✓ 2 � 2 JV OG 7N - O W r C O � I dT r U O V y I O O r 9 _ = Jcr � d CN Inner � y III � d r O 2r O GrC C � '^ C. pO u iCO No I Otv = U' ..r of nrn c c _ry G y J = 4 y_ 77 q = V \V\• b m _ `` \N O U � b ✓ T� rJ y �- �r i V V D C G.� C V � O U O _ O n y +� ✓ U � d^.r T S a. � d T C r N L U U C N� r _ q C , N✓ •� C I � 06 � f� J _ ^_ C_ NC - CIcVO 00 O �_ O� _ V _ ✓ aL E C` ... l ri �C -�. y E ` ^T C_' - C' y G r 1 I I'J pCG Op' V V yV. Cu nCV - r. l ? y C G'r GC� > C � � O � T- 1 dO� C� � LCGG iy GC O Cr JQWOu � � LC C O b C r U U V� y ✓V L 7 N y •O+� T l C 'r� C V V t N '' Gr 10 Liu bO V� O ^J.'n JU7� �r u.� ✓v e.� `' ^Jy =y .. w ._ O ` ` O.^V O c' G� m� G J d ; y l_ L` ✓rT. i✓ _ = T t ✓ u c O I� OV NGV O� NULV NNV .+ Lr r :u i n uv 1 1 a- ci� 0 0 i T— o— a o � — o •� E f N � � I 1 4—, ci I _ c ace a CITY OF RANCHO CUCA ONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 22, 1984 1977 i; TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner i BY: Tim J. Beedle, Senior Planner SUBJECT: DRAF- HOUSING ELEMENT, PART I - TECHNICAL DEMOGRAPHIC HOUS:,,u DATA 1 BACKGROUND: As you recall, the Housing Element work program includes the c". pletion of an update of the technical information within the Housing Element. The purpose of Part I is to assess the housing needs by: (1) updating demographic and housing data in light of new sources of information (i .e. 1980 census and annual housing update information) ; and, (2) assessing housing trends both locally and regionally which may influence Rancho Cucamonga. ® In order to assess our housing needs, California state housing guidelinas require that the Housing Element should analyze the following characteristics: o Populuation o Housing o Housing Demand o Vacant Land Inventory o Housing Availability o Housing Assistance Needs o Energy Conservation Opportunites o Existing Housing Conditions o Constraints toward new housing All nine of these elements have been included as sub-chapters within part one. An introduction with a su,,mnary of the highlights is included within each sub-chapter. Alone, this document presents a factual overview of the state of existing and future housing trends in Rancho Cucamonga. Part II of the Housing Element update will include an assessment of local housing goals and policies as they relate to the updated demographic trends and characteristics. Once completed, those two parts will be combined to form the updated Housing Element. It is anticipated that this will be forwarded to the Planning Commission during the month of March for review and comment. Staff will also be sending a completed Copy to the California State Housing and Community Development Department as prescribed by law for their review and comment prior to final action by the Planning Commission. ITEM H PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Draft Housing Element February 22, 1984 Page 2 r REC I. It i and ommentlon Part I, theotechnical ,ademographic,the n-and review the Draft Housing Element. usrg data of Re4ectf!illy �;,,itted, f oanner RG:TB:jr Attachment: Draft Housing Element, Part One i Try'