Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984/10/10 - Agenda PacketAM 1. t-,j N�\�7 crry O RANCHO CLC%.1I0 \GA iAy TI \'G' C©vEkjjSSj0'\T �Z AGED -, 19� WEDNESDAY OCTOBER 10, 1984 7 :00 p.m. ,7`5 PARK COMMUNITY CEWrE& 9_61 BASE LINE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA A C T I O N S L Pledge of Allegiance IL Roll Call Commissioner Barker X- Commissioner Chitiea X Commissioner McNiel X III. Aunauncements Approved 5 -0 -0 IV. Approval of Minutes August 22, 1384 V. Consent Calendar Commissioner RempelX _ Commissioner Stout A--' The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non- eentroversiaL They will be acted on by the Commission at one time withWt discussion If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. Removed for discussion A. TENTATIVE TRACT 12490 - AMERICAN NATIONAL - Continued to 10/24/84_ Reapplication for Design Review of site plan and architectural changes for 121 condominiums on 6.1 acres of land, located on the es, _ -ide of Vineyard, south of Foothill. Approved 5 -0 -0 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT , EVIEW 84 -39 - FORECAST - The development of an 18,500 sq. ,t. office building on 1.1 acres located at the south side of Civic Center Drive, east of Haven Avenue in the Industrial Park (Subarea 7) District - APN 208--622-38. Approved 5 -0 -0 C. TIME EXTENSION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 83 -05 - ETIWANDA I2qVEST_v1ENT -The development of a 411,000 sq. t .warehouse distribution facility on 23.8 acres of land in the Heavy Industrial (Subarea 15) category located on the south side of 7th Street, approximately 1,045 feet west of Etiwanda Avenue, Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 6658. Approved 5-0 -0 D. TIME EXTENSION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 83-02 - BAAMAKIAN - The development of six 6) industrial buildings totaling 25,032 square feet on 1.57 acres of land in the General Industrial cateogry (Subarea 1), located on the north side of 8th Street, west of Vineyard Avenue - APN 207 -271- 53, 54, and 55. Approved 5 -0 -0 CONCURRENCE WITH THE CONCEPTUAL PLAN FOR �p r1T7 ^h SRnnTOA nn_1,111"c, wr.' Approved 5-0 -0 F. VL Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Continued to 11/14!84 G. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -21 - ALTA LOMt A CHRISTIAN CHURCH - A request to convert an existing 1,868 sq. ft. single family residence to an office for the Alta Loma Christian Church on .25 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District, located at the west side of Sapphire, across from Orange - APN 1062- 332 -23. Approved 5-0-0 with H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE deletion of Cond. #6 and PERMIT 8.1-26 - STORAI•L - A request to convert 754 sq. ft. modification. of Cond. #4. ocean approved building into a caretaker`s effice and residence for a self- service storage facility on 3.51 acres of land in the General Industrial (Subarea 5) District, located at 9605 9th Street, west of Archibald Avenue - APN 209 -031 - 043. Approved 5-0 -0 Approved 5-0 -0 L (Subarea 13) located north of 6th Rochester Avenue - APN 229 - 261 -9239. J. ENrVIRON MAP 8763 - - a mvimon of to acres Development District Street, east of Old vuu '.ant vOUV - DESESAF_D - A division of 7.78 acres into 6 parcels in the General Industrial/Rail Served Development District (Subarea 5) located at the northwest corner of Center Avenue and 6th Street - APN 209 - 261 -07. Denied 5 -0 -0 K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND rntc.aitt 64 -'L4 - UkiArrlG -a proposal to operate a l,ubu sq. ft. auto rental office and maintenance of a maximum of 15 automobiles within an existing commercial plaza on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, west of Archibald Avenue - APN 208- 261 -52. L, ?44 N, concurrence L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN with Staff Concept. AMENDMENT 84 -04 -A - HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT - A General Plan Amendment from Office to Industriai Park for approximately 40 acres of land located •m the west side of Haven Avenue, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Highway, in conjunction with the Haven Avenue Overlay District - APN 208 - 331 -01, 12, 13, and 208 - 341 -01. M. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND 1/lj 1 rug. i - A SJevelopmenL vistrict amenamenz trom yr Office /Professional) to ISP (industrial Specific Plan) for approximately 40 acres of land located on the west side of Haven Avenue, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Highway, in conjunction with the Haven Avenue Overlay District - APN 208- 331 -01, 12, 13 and 208 - 341 -G1. N. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL uc y.�.ii av ri MLI t IWIFIl\1JLVlAlY1 0Y-12 — r1.1VAPI 1ftVA'4Ur. OVERLAY DISTRICT - An amendment to the Indl:strial Specific Plan to expand the boundary of Subarea 7 ( Indmstrial Paris Category) to include approximately 40 acre: of land located on the west side of Haven Avenue, between Focthil Boulevard and Arrow Highway, in conjuction wife the Haven Avenue Overlay District - APN 208- 331 -01, 1;, 13 and 208- 341-01. Continued to 10/24184 O. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AFD INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 84 -02 - HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICP - Planning Comm'---,sion review of public comments and recommendations from the Chamber of Commerce regarding the Interim Davelopment Policies for Haven Avenue, between 4th Street Fnd Foothill Boulevard. VIL New Business Approved 5-0 -0 P. ENVIRONMENTAL_ ASSESSMENT AND , rAy1Ary 34-4L - 2 anmatiLa,4 - -i -ne aeveiepment oI a Z -story medical office building towing 199100 sq. ft. on 1.07 acres of land in the Industrial Park category (Subarea S) located at the northwest corner cf Haven Avenue and Trademark Avenue - APN 210 - 381 -01. Approved 5-0 -0 with Q. staff direction to exa- mine burglar alarm systems. MENT Aofa I 2 unit, apartment unit __F_ omplex on 0.88 acrf: of land in the Medium Reridential District (8 -14 du/aci ' .eated at 8670 Array: Ki hway, on the north side of .'irrow Py between Barker avenue and Vineyard Avenue - A1,N 2ZV 1- 201 -12. Approved 5-G -0 ENVIRONJENTAL ASSE&gMENT AND i- EVELOPMENT 7$V) !4 4-u6 - COCA COLA - A recue:.t to expand a ?reviously Approved waranc'ise additiOn frari 21,690 sq. ft. to 31,200 ft. on 9.2 auras cf land in the Industrial Part: (Subaree S- categc :;• located at the no�thoest corner of 6th Street at!i: Oti .a Aveaste - APN 209 - 411 -16. L71-1 FREFRIT Referred to Historic S. CASS LETD S POLKA PALACE - Potential General Plan and Preservation Comossion Development ristrict Change on the property generally for possible historical located southwest of Highland and EtiwandaAvenues. designation status. 11L Public Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. Y. Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. Adjourned to 10/15/94 at 6:30 p.m., Neighborhood Center to discuss Terra Vista phasing. -1 t�. s 7 CITY OF Rr: \CHO CLc, \%10\•G.4L _ PLANNING C�GvIi�IISSIO ail ! AGE L 1977 WEDNESDAY OCiOl3ER 10, 1984 7:03 p.m. LIONS PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALWORNIA L Pledge of Allegiance IL Roll Ckd Commissioner Barker Commissioner Chitiea Commissioner McNiel Ill. Announcements IV. Approval of Minutes August 22, 1984 Y. Consent Calendar Commissioner Rempel Commissioner Stout The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. A. TENTATIVE TRACT 12490 - AMERICAN NATIONAL - Eeappl:cation for Design Review of site plan and architectural charges for 121 condominiums on 6.1 acres of land, located on the east side of Vineyard, south of Foothill. B. ]ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSI4ENT FOR DEVELOPMENT AEVIr W 84-39--­FORECAST - The development of an 18,500 sq. It. office build;ng on 1.1 acres located at the south side of Civic Center Drive, east of Haven Avenue in the Industrial Park (Subarea 7) District - APN 53-,622 -3S. C. TIME EXTENSION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 83 -05 - ETIWA.NDA INVESTMENT -The development of a 411,000 sq. t. warehouse di,ztribution facility on 23.8 acres of land in the Heavy Industrial (Subarea _Si category located on the south side c€ 7th Street, appro)dmately 1,145 feet west of Etiwanda Avenue, Parcel 2 of Parcel Ilan, 3853. D. E. F. FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 93-02 - - ine aevelopment of six (6) industrial buildings totaling 25,032 square feet on 1.57 acres of land in the General Industrial cateogry (Subarea 1), located on the north side of 8th Street, west of 'Vineyard Avenue - APN 207 -271- 53, 54, and 55. WITH THE CONCEPTUAL PLAN FOR VL Public Bearings 'he %Ilowirg items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the r-nmmission by stating your name and address. ALI such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. G. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -21 - ALTA LOMA CHRISTIAN CHURCH - A request to convert an existing 1,868 sq. ft. single family residence to an office for the Alta Lorna Christian Church on .25 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District, located at the west side of Sapphire, across from Orange - APN 1962- 332 -23. H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -2u - STORALL - A request to cronvert 754 so. ft. of an `PPro�'ed building into a caretaker's office and residence for e.self- service storage facility on 3.51 acres of land in the General Industrial (Subarea 3) District, located at 9605 9th Streei, wart of Archibald Avenue - APN 209 -031- 043. L ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSFVIENT AND PARCEL MAP 8763 - ROCHESTER FREE— W- y NORTH LTD. -A division of 9 acres into 2 parcels in the Gthe erneraal industrial Development District (Subarea 13) located north of 6th Street, a Lst of Old Ro ^_hester Avenue - APN 229 - 261 -9239. v. EN'JiROI�i4iENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8800 - DEBERARD - A division of 7.75 acres into 6 parcels in the General Industrial/Rilil Served Development District (Subarea 5) located at the northwest corner of Centr Avenue and 6th Street - APN 209 - 261 -07. K. ENVIROMMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -24 - CHAPPIE - A proposal to operate a 4C50 sq. ,t. auto rental office and maintenance of a maximum of 15 automobiles within an existing commercial plaza on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, west of Archibald Avenue - APN 208- 261 -52. L. M. N. wiDl u,.,i - ti ueaerai Plan mmtN C mem. irom Viliee Lo Industrial Park for approximately 40 acres of land located on the west side of aa•.en Avenue, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Highway, in conjunction with the Haven Avenue Overlay District - APN 208- 331 -01; 12, 13, and 208 - 341 -01. (Office /Professional) to 1SP (Industrial Specific Plan) for approximately 40 acres of Land located on the west side of Haven Avenue, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Highway, in conjunction with the Haven Avenue Overlay District - APN 206- 331 -01, 12, 13 and 208 - 341 -01. AND IN - NAVFA W +a.ula31 "� Ii %'l - L1n ?AHI=LUIIIG1lL W ULU XLUkY Lrl81 Specific PFaW to expand the boundarI of Subarea 7 (Industrial Park Category) to include approximately 40 acres of land located on the west side of Haven avenue, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Highway, in conjuction with the Haven Avenue Overlay District - APN `s'8- 33?. -01, 12, 13 and 208- 341 -01. O. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLATS AMENDMENT 84 -02 - HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICr - Planning Commission review of public comments and recommendations from the Chamber of Commerce regarding the Interim Development Policies for Haven Avenue, between 4th Street and Foothill Boulevard. VII. New Bus@uess P. ENVIRONMENT unvinw 64-4'L - UARIMAKIAN -The Geveiopment of a 2 -Story medical office building totaling 19,100 sq. ft. on 1.07 acres of land in the Industrial Park category (Subarea 6) located at the northwest corner of Haven Avenue and Trademark A-enue - APN 210 - 381 -01. -I , Q. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84 -3i - "BORE AND STELE - The development of a 12 unit apartment unit complex on 0.88 acres of land in the Medium Residentiai District (8 -I4 du/ac) located at 8670 Arrow Highway, or, the n.Orth side of !trr^ r Highway between Barker Avenue and Vinevard Avenue - APN 207- 201 -12. R. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT P.EVIEW 84-06 - COCA COLA - A request to expand a pre;viuusiy approved warehouse addition from 21,600 sq. ft. to 31,200 sq. ft. on 9.2 acres of land in the Industrial Park (Subarea 6) category located at the northwest corner of 6th Street and Utica Avenue - A PN 209 - 411 -16. VIII. Council Referrals S. CASSALETTPS POLKA PALACE - Potential General Plan and ioevelopment District Change on the propirty generally located southwest of Highland and Etiwanda Avenues. DL Public Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. X. Adjournment The PIanning Commission has adopted Administro.'•,e Regulations that set an 11 p.m. adjoumment time.. If items go ..eyord that timc, they shall be hearts only with the consent of Lie Commission_ f i 1 ` i_'� MAP C TARJC :xfEFSALP`Al AW Car • CaAI)OZaVt Ci7Y OF PAINCHO CA?C J*C*# 4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting August 22, 1984 Chairman Dennis Stout called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was held at Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Lire Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman Stout then led in the pledge of allegiance. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: E. David Barker, Suzanne Chitiea, Larry McNiel, Herman Rempel, Dennis Stout COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Tim Beedle, Senior Planner; Dan Coleman, Associate Planner; Linda Daniels, Associate Planner; Rick Gomez, City Planner; Edward Hopson, Assistant City Attorney; Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer; Curt Johnston, Associate Planner; Dino Putrino, Assistant Planner; Janice Reynolds, Secretary APPROVAL OF MINUTES Regarding the Minutes of the June 27, 1984 meeting Commissioner Barker referred to the discussion regarding the lattice screening material and stated that Chairman Stout had made the comments. Commissioner Chitiea suggested that the first name appearing in the public hearing might be misspelled. Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by McNiel, unanimously carried, to approve the amendments with the above corrections. Regarding the Minutes of the July 11, 1584 meeting, Chairman Stout referred to the second paragraph of page 3 and amended it to read "a request to change the 0? in the location to Medium -High residential"; page 6, third paragraph was amended to read ". . . he feels may be appropriate" rather than "is appropriate"; and page 7, last paragraph amended to read "windrows to the north and south are on this parcel ". Commissioner Chitiea requested that the middle paragraph of page 8 be amended to read ". . . if Mr. Mazur intended to add . . " and additionally requested that paragraph 6 of page 9 be stricken. Commissioner Barker amended page 6, second paragraph to read " . design issue which has been addressed" and the last lire in that paragraph to reflect that the developer did not want single story units. Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Rempei, unanimously carried, to approve the Minutes of July 11, 1984 Rs amended. Planning Commission Minutes -1- August 22, 1984 CONSENT CALENDAR A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84 -27 - KAISER - The development or six 6 industrial warehouse /manufacturing buildings totaling 55,200 square feet on three (3) acres in the Industrial Park area (Subarea 12) located at the north side of Thomas Street, between Cleveland and Vincent - APN 210- 261 -5, 6, 10 thru 13. B. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 11932 - EJL DEVELOPMENT CORPORAI.-)N - A proposed custorr lot subdivision of 2.7 acres of land in the Low Residential district into ten (10) lots located on the north side of Finch Avenue, west of Haven Avenue and south of Highland Avenu? - APN 202 -191- 15. C. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 10088- NICOSIA - A residential subdivision of 82 acres into 131 single fami y lots irr the Very Low Residen'Lial District generally located at the northeast corner of Archibald and Carrari Street - APN 201- 07 -14, 37, and 45. Motion: Moved by P.ernpel, seconded by McNiel, unanimously carried, to adopt the Consent Calendar. PUBLIC HEARINGS D. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -18 - HAIRE - A request to convsrt a portion of a residence into a second dwelling unit on one acre of land in the Very Low Residential District, to be located at 5507 Canistel Avenue. Dino Putrino, Assistant Planner, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. There were no convents: therefore the public hearing was closed. Motion: Commissioner Rempei stated that this is an appropriate use to supply the need of keeping families together and Trade the motion to approve. Motion seconded by Barker, unanimously carried. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: RU PEL, BARKER, CITIEA, MCNIEL, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried Planning Commission Minutes -2- August 22, 1984 E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -09 - OF LATTER -DAY SAINTS? - The development of a Z5,000 square foot building for a church and meeting hal -T and a 336 square foot storage facility on 7.74 acres of land in the Very Low and Low District (Etiwanda Specific Plan) located at 6829 Etiwanda Avenue, north of Victoria Avenue - APN 227 -06 -55 and 23. Linda Daniels, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report stating that the major issue involved with this project was to design the church and site to be compatible with the Etiwanda Specific Plan and surrounding residences. Further, that the church had been redesigned to reflect the Design Review Committee's recommendations of having the building style and design be more compatible with existing single family homes through the use of dormer windows and recesses to break up the roof mass, the use of traditional building materials as set forth in the Etiwanda Specific Plan, the replacement of the parking pavement with turf block in the area leading to Victoria Avenue, and the design and height of the identification tower. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Ronald Is0 i, architect for the applicant, asked if the proposed roofing material was acceptable to the Commission. Commissioner Barker replied that the Design Review Committee desired wood or rustic roof tile appearance and that the proposed roofing material seems to meet that intent. Mr. Ishii addressed the issue of the tower. He stated that the tower proposed for this church rises 48 feet above the roof line of the building, which is above the height limitations of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Mr. Ishii stated that the tower is an important part of a Latter -Day Saints church building and has been given special exemption in ether cities. He requested that the Commission consider this a special circumstance. Jim Frost, Etiwanda resident, addressed the Comrission expressing concern that no plans were being submitted for the entire parcel and ask what legal leverage the City would have as improvements were installed on the eastern side of the prop =rty. Mr. Frost also questioned the timing of the windrow removal at the eastern part of the parcel. He additionally expressed concern with the adjacent property owner's liability it connection with the athletic field and with the drainage on Victoria. James Clark, 686 Etiwanda Avenue, expressed concern with the design of the church, off -site parking, and with setbacks. He requested that the church be moved further to the east. Dave Hawkins, 6990 East Avenue, stated that he was happy to have the church come into the community. Planning Commission Minutes -3- August 22, 1984 David Long, Etiwanda resident: stated that staff worked hard on this project with the applicant. He stated that the property to the east is part of the grading and drainage plans approved. by the City. Additionally, that the setbacks-are designed to enable the placement of the athletic fields on the site. Mr. Long stated that the church is sensitive to the needs of neighbors and provided more parking than required. Further, that the windrow removal and replacement is monitored by the City. Commissioner Barker asked if the Commission has the flexibility to deal with the tower issue. Edward Hopson, Assistant City Attorney, replied that if the limitation is for structures, the Commission could determine that something in as open an area as a tower wasn't the kind of structure for which the limitation was intended. Therefore, the Co,nmission could make this determination without harming the intent of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Rick Gomez, City Planner, stated that the Etiwanda Specific Plan has no requirements for bell towers or spires; however, the Development Code has provisions that state that spires, bell towers, or similar zrchitectural features may not exceed heights cf 15 feet above a roof line. Chairman, Stout stated that it then appears that 50 feet would be an acceptable I eight. Mr. Gomez advised that the height of the tower should also be reviewed in light of compatibility with the surrounding area. Mr. Ishii addressed the Commission stating that the setbacks are 10 feet further back than those required by the Etiwanda Specific Plan and that the drainage problems in the area probably will be solved with the development of the church site. He also stated that the building materials are not those traditionally used by the church and asked for an explanation cf the architectural requirements. Ms. Daniels explained that the Etiwanda Specific Plan recommends three architectural styles, the bungelow, Victorian or barn style, with certain types of materials such as wood siding and the use of rock, which is compatible with the existing residences in Etiwanda. There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Rempel addressed the windrow removal issue and stated that the trees cannot be cut down until such time as the play area develops and must be replanted at the same time. He pointed out that there are two streets which dead end into site but there are no conditions reflecting what will happen to them at that point and suggested that there might be a problem with drainage and circulation at those locations. Commissioner McNiel stated that a lot of work has gone into this project and that most questions raised during the public hearing have been answered. Planning Commission Minutes -4- August 22, 1984 Chairman Stout asked what the expectations are for the out parcel. Tim Beedle, Senior Planner, replied that any alterations would have to come back to the Commission in the form of a Conditional Use Permit. Ted Hopson, Assistant City Attorney, stated that the site plan is reflected in Exhibit "B" of the Planning Commission staff report and any alterations to that plan would be required to be reviewed by the Commission. Commissioner Barker asked if there should be a condition for the stub streets. Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer, replied that a condition should be added to address the stub streets. Chairman Stout requested that a condition be placed on the resolution which clarified that any development or lighting of the fields on the back parcel would be required to come back before the Commission. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Chitiea, unanimously carried, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the Resolution approving Conditional Use Permit 84 -09 with additional conditions to require any changes such as lights or buildings on the rear parcel to return to the Planring Commission for review, and that streets dear: ending into this site are to be cul-de-sacs or other means to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. AYES: COMSISSAONERS: REMPEL, CHITIEA, BARKER, MCP:IEL, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -13 - SYCAMORE INVESTMENTS - The development of a 43,992 square foot commercial shopping center with retail shops, fast food restaurant, and gasoline service station /convenience market on 5.444 acres of land in the Neighborhood Commercial district located on the northeast corner of Archibald and Base Line - APN 202- 181 -27. Dan Coleman, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Jan Kraus presented the site plan for the applicant, which she stated met the Design Review Committee and staff recommendations. Bart Stryker, Stryker Engineering, presented a second grading plan which in his opinion mitigated the Grading Committee's concerns. Planning Commission Minutes -5- August 22, 1984 Chairman Stout closed the public hearing. Commissioner Chitiea stated concerns with another commercial center at that location and the safety of pedestrian walkways within the project. She additionally stated that the Del Taco architecture did not match the rest of the center_ Commissioner McNiel stated that based on the history of this site, he would have expected a much better design and that he was disappointed in that this project seems to be a very efficiently designed strip center. He agreed that the pedestrian access seemed hazardous. Chairman Stout stated that the project nothing which connects them in theme, commercial center. He agreed with Comm the Del Taco does not fit in lath the concerns with the pedestrian access in citizen project. seems to be 5 separate buildings with shape or form and looks like a strip iissioner Chitiea in that the design of rest of the center and also expressed light of the adjacent proposed senior Commissioner Barker agreed that this project does not fulfill the objective of being pedestrian - oriented. Commissioner Rempel stated that this is not going to be a center where a person will spend a lot of time, but one where an item or two is purchased and then you leave. He agreed that the Del Taco does not echo the theme of the rest of the center. He also stated that adequate provisions for pedestrian access exist in the center, but suggested that more benches be added and recommended that the walkway from the Del Taco into the project be more defined. Also, that the south driveway onto Base Line should line up with the Albertson's driveway. Motion.: Conditional Moved by Chitiea, seconded by Use Permit 84 -13. Barker, carried, to deny the AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, BARKER, MCNIEL, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NGNE - carried Commissioner Rempel stated No because he felt the concerns could be mitigated. 8:30 - Planning Commission Recessed 8:40 - Planning Commission Reccnvened Planning Commission Minutes -6- August 22, 1984 G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8648 - LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY - A division of 22.41 acres into 3 parcels within the Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial category (Subarea-9) located on the northwest corner of Rochester Avenue and 8th Street - APN 229- 111 -8, 9. Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout stated that when this project was before the Commission as a Development Review conditions were placed on the Resolution requiring some type of agreement for future rail use and asked if those conditions would still apply to the Parcel Map. Mr. Hubbs replied that a condition was placed on the Parcel Map which incorporated all conditions of the Development Review. Cnairman Stout_ opened the public hea -ing. Bill Shubin, representing Lincoln Properties, addressed the Commission stating that the applicant is currently working with the Engineering staff and City Attorney to ccm_ up with the proper agreement for the rail use. There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Barker, unanimously carried, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the Resolution approvinc: Parcel Map 8648. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, BARKER, CHITiEA, MCNIEL, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE A35ENT: COMMISSIONERS NONE H. DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Planning Commission review of th e of 16 lots on 20.9 acres and a adjacent land in the Hillside located north of Almond Street, 200- 051 -06, 07. - carried Draft EIP, for a custom lot subdIviSlon conceptual master plan for 94 acres of Residential and Open Space Districts, generally west of Sapphire Street - APN Curt Johnston, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Art Bridge, 8715 Banyan Street, Rancho Cucamonga, presented a letter to the Commission which outlined his concerns. Mr. Bridge summarized the contents of his letter which expressed concerns with grading and padded lots, street lights, hydrology, density, multi -story units, and circulation. He suggested the possibility of the applicant posting bonds to restore the site to its natural state should the project not be completed. Planning Commission Minutes -7- August 22, 1984 Chuck Morgan, Rancho Cucamonga resi,:ent, addressed the Commission stating that the area is not conducive to one -half acre lots and would prefer 2 dwelling units per acre. He expressed concerns wit, hydrology and runoff down Incline Drive. He additionally expressed concerns that this approval is for a master plan of 94 acres. Gary Healy, Madole & Associates, addressed the Commission explaining that the project will drain into the Almond Intercept and will alleviate some of the flooding problems in the area. He further advised that the grading and drainage plans are subject to review and approval by the City staff. Curt Johnston, Associate Planner, explained that the master plan for the entire 94 acre parcel was a requirement by staff and that the intent was to set a street pattern and determine how its effects on Tract 12376. He advised that the basic lot configuration will require further review when the parcel has a map submitted. Michael Vairin, 6981 Opal, Rancho Cucamonga, addressed the Commission stating concerns with circulation and hydrology. He also pointed out that the EIR doesn't address the issue of recreational vehicle access to the mountain areas above this parcel and suggested that the Commission might address this issue. Lloyd Dorsey, 7825 Almond, Rancho Cucamonga, expressed agreement with the comments made by those who spoke before him. Catherine Bridge, 8715 Banyan, Rancho Cucamonga, stated that this si,,e is unique in its comination of all environmental concerns and warrants special considerat;on. Jim Previty, representing the applicant, advised that the master plan for the entire 94 acre parcel was done as a requirement of City staff. Further, that the applicant had tried to comply with all suggestions of the City. Chairman. Stout closed the public hearing. Commissioner Barker expressed agreement vith Mr. Bridge's statements regarding the size of the lots and agreed that the hydrology must be addressed with permanent and substantial devices. He asked Mr. Hopson if the bonds suggested by Mr. Bridge can be required. Edward Hopson, Assistant City Attorney, replied that development bonds for completion of off -site improvements are provided for in the Subdivision Map Act which allows for bonds to be used to completed unfinished off -site improvements. However, bonds cannot be required to place land back in its original state. Commissioner Barker stated that he was most comfortable with Alternative 3, but even that alternative has some problems in that it places some houses on fault lines. He advised that the location and size of homes is of extreme concern and care should be taken in their placement. Planning Commission Minutes -8- August 22, 1984 Commissioner Rempel stated concerns with some proposed street and lot layouts around the wash and advised that the City should not get into the area of placing homes where landslides would be a problem. He also ec„oed Mr. Bridge's concern regarding padded lots and stated that the house should fit the lot. He suggested that the pads not be graded or driveways put in until the house is ready to be built. Regarding drainage, he advised that he would to see country roads with catch basins every few hundred feet and no curbs. He stated that his choice would be some hybrid variation of Alternative 3. Commissioner McNiel agreed with the concerns expressed and chose Alternative 3. Commissioner Chitiea agreed that Alternative 3 was one of the better alternatives in that it considers greenbelts and trails. She stated that she liked the clustering and smaller lots to get open space. She disagreed that only single level homes should be built in the area and stated that some split level designs with certain color and landscape palettes could achieve a more aesthetically pleasing view than a long linear house. Commissioner Stout stated that he favored Alternative 3 in that it seems to mitigate most problems, although it has problems also. Further, he would not like to see the building pads graded flat, but take advantage of natural contours. He advised that the idea of hillside residential lots of 2 net buildable dwelling units per acre came into effect in areas with no problems; however, the overall density of this project would be much less due to the nature of the problems associated with it. He further stated that there are fire concerns which should be addressed and sLtcgested that the applicant work with the Fire District for possible solutions s,ich as fire breaks or the use of certain-plant matef•ials. He agreed that hydrology is of major concern and that the project has to provide access to the recreational areas. Commissioner Rempel stated that he would prefer to see some method to prevent motorcycles and dune buggies from getting to the hills above this project because the area is not conducive to those types of vehicles. Chairman Stout summarized the Commission's direction for inclusio. in the EIP. to include minimizing the amount of pad grading and have design of structures take advantage of natural terrain whether through built -up foundations or multi- levels; Alternative 3 or some hybrid for he area plan; hydrology and the major flooding issue to be addressed by permanent rather than temporary measures; and a more definitive look at the fire issue. Planning Commission Minutes -9- August 22, 1984 CRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT F;,R CUP 84 -06 - HFA ASSOCIATES - Review and consideration of a supplemental Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for development of a regional shopping center on 100 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Communit to be located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of Interstate 1.5 - APN 227- 201 -35; 227 - 211 -30. Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report. therefore the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by McNiel, unanimously carried, to find the draft EIR adequate and forward it to the City Council and Redevelopment Agency for their review and comment. " i- , "YLNTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -06 - HFA ASSOCIATES Con— ceptual review of a meter plan for the development of a regional shopping center on 100 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community to be located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of Interstate 15 - APN 227 - 201 -35; 227 - 221 -30. Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report. the public hearing. Dan Felix, representing the applicant, addressed the Commission regarding the water element. He indicated that the renderings before the Commission this evening represent the most the developer can do and urged that the Commission take into consideration the problems and liabilities associated with this requirement. He advised that regional projects which contain water elements are typically deeded to the City. He suggested that at this time the water element be kept outside the ring road and if in working with staff a solution is found to permit penetration of the element, the developer would do so. He aivised that all other suggestions by the Commission had been addressed. Michael Vairin, 6981 Opal, Rancho Cucamonga, encouraged the Commission to pursue the style of bringing outside elements into the project to alleviate the harshness of the exterior. Jim Barton, 5520 Canistel, Rancho Cucamonga, stated that landscaping should be around the perimeter of a project and disagreed that landscaping should be in placed in the interior of the parking areas, but should be placed on the lead end sides or near parkways. He expressed concern with future expansion of the center as presently configured. Additionally, he agreed with the developer that the water element should be kept on one side of the project and suggested the possibility of bringing the water environment to the inside of the center. Planning Commission Minutes Dar, Coleman, Associate Planner, addressed the issue of future expansion, and explained that specific architectural designs will be submitted at a later date and advised that the intent of this meeting is to review the master plan. There was further discussion regarding future expansion plans and the accommodation of parking areas. Mr. Gomez explained that the Hahn Company is not committing to a certain design at this time, but complying with the terms of the Agreement between the company and the City which requires that a .master plan and Conditional Use Permit must be submitted and approved by the City. Additionally, precise development plans would be submitted and reviewed by the Commission some time in late 1985. no further comments, therefore the public hearing was Commissioner Stout stated that included i^ the landscape plan. Mr. Coleman replied that citrus trees could be used as an accent. He advised that staff has been working with the applicant's landscape architect and will continue working with them on a concept to be presented to the Commission in late along with the development plans. Commissioner Barker addressed the water element and stated that although it was not the way he envisioned it in the Victoria Plar:, he was not opposed to the way the site is currently planned. He suggested that later some sort of lake or water statement might be included as part of the interior site design Commissioner Rempel agreed and stated that would be visible to the people driving by. Chairman Stout stated that if the general agreement was that it is not feasible to bring the lake down further into the shopping center because of liability he would suggest that the water element be required to be a very strong element and suggested that meandering rock landscaping should be used to suggest a continuation of the lake eiement. Chaiinan Stout referred to the smaller lake at the southwest corner of the Victoria Plan which was a part of the Resolution and asked the applicant if that condition was agreeab-,_ Dan Felix, Hahn Company, replied that the only lake consistently looked at by the developer is the lake on the nol,theast corner of the project. He advised that the more lake element the more problems are created which grow in magnitude. Stout stated that if it turns out that the lake element is not some type of open space element would be an interesting compromise. Commissioner McNiel stated a lot is being lost with respect to the aesthetics of the project. Further, the lake was originally proposed to be an integral part of the design but has become an obscurity and a good deal of the original concept is being lost. He further stated that the lake as it is presently designed has no effect on the building shape, but if brought on the other side Commission Minutes of the loop it would to some degree dictate the shape or configuration, of the mall. He further stated that with all due respect to marketability, this plan is consistent with most other mails passed on every freeway and that the City has an opportunity before them to develop a mall that people respond to. Commissioner Chitiea quoted from the Victoria plan and stated that the lake is more isolated a•.: is not a key element of the design. She stated that the design is typi:al of any center anywhere and that the landscaping is not approached a creative manner and is not special to Rancho Cucamonga. She referred to Chairman Stout's recommendation for the use of ''itrus trees and stated that they are essential to the plan and that pala trees are not expressive of Rancho Cucamonga. Further, that the whole concept is not remotely what was originally envisioned and that she would hate to see money put into a design which the Commission would not be any happier vrith than they are now. She suggested that massive changes should be made at this point in time because none of the issues of the design workshop had been addressed. Commissioner Rempei stated that neither of the regional centers had originally been designed around a water element. He advised that what was being said at that time was that the City wanted a regional center because it is a focal point of the community and because of tax base. He further stated that there may be a some people who would go to a regional center because of its beauty, the other million would go for one thing only and that would be to shop. He stated that convenience is prime factor to be dealt with along with the issue of getting the center and that the harder it is for an applicant to bui id a center, the longer it would be before the City would get one. HE pointed out that the City is in a battle with Ontario and Fontana and that too many roadblocks placed in front of the applicant would keep the project from going on schedle. He additionally stated that he would hate to have been on Commision which saw the regional center moved to Fontana. Commissioner Chitiea stated this mall is going to be here a long time and has to be more than just another shopping center. Further she wanted to have something for the people of Rancho Cucamonga to be proud of, not another Montclair Plaza. Gimmissicner Rempel proposea a motion t;-.?t the lake at the northeast portion of the site be designed to give more attractiveness and visibility to the area so that the lakes that will continue north ore the prime area that will make this area unique. He added that this would be an amendment to condition two of the Council Resolution. He 'urther suggested that reference to the lake at the southeast quadrant be changed to read that it be designed with adequate open space. Motion died for lack of second. Cl.airman Stout made a motion to adopt Resolution as currently written, seconded by Mchiel. Motion failed 2 -3. Planning Commission Minutes -12- August 22, 1984 Motion. Commissioner Chitiea made the motion to adopt the Resolution with the following rewording to the first sentence of condition number two of the Council Resolution: "The northern lake shall become the form giving element and provide greater visibility of the lake and lake edge activities." The remaining portion of the condition would remain as written. Motion seconded by Stout, unanimously carried. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, STOUT, BARKER, MCNIEL, REMPEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried x * * * * 11:00 p.m. - Commission Recessed 11:10 p.m. - Commission Reconvened Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by McNiel, unanimously carried, to continue past the 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. Chairman Stout announced that the following items would be heard concurrently. K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 84 -02 A - 19TH STREET CORRIDOR STUDY - An amendment to the General Plan Land Use Map from Medivm -Nigh Residential (14 -24 du /ac) to Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac) for 4.96 acres of land, located at the northwest corner of 19th Street and Beryl Street - APN 201 - 221 -08. L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMEN'f DISTRICT AMENDMENT 84 -02 A - 19TH STREET CORRIDOR STUDY - A Development District amendment from "MH" 4- du/ac) Y-) "M" (8 -14 du /ac; for 4.96 acres of land, located at the northwest corner of 19th Street and Beryl Street - 'ON 201 - 221 -08. M. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL P1 AN AMENDMENT 84 -02 6 - 19TH STREET CORRIDOR STUDY - An amendment to the General Plan Land Use Map from Office to Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac) and f•om Medium -High Residential (14 -24 du /ac) on 18.75 total acres of land, loctedon the north side of 19th Street between Archibald Avenue and Amethyst Avenue - APN 201 - 101 -07, 11, 21, 22. N. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 84 -02B - 19TH STREET CORRID�iR— STUDY - A Deve opment District amendment from OP Office/Prof essiona to M (8 -14 du /ac) on 18.75 total acres of land, located on the north side of 19th Street between Archibald Avenue - APN 201 - 101 -07, 11, 21 and 22. Planning Commission Minutes -13- August 22, 1984 0. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT r+nu hG1VCKAL rLAA w11_2Ui - CORRIDOR ST!JDY - An amendment to the General Plan Land Use +'ap from Office and Low ifedium Residential (4 -8 du /ac) to Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) on 11.23 acres of land, located at the northeast corner of 19th Street and Hermosa Avenue - APN 202 - 191 -13, 14, 23. P. ENVIROVENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 8442 C - 19TH TREET CORRIDOR TUDY - A Development District amendment from --ur Office /Professional and "LM" (4 -8 du /ac) to "L" (2 -4 du /ac) on 11.23 acres of land located at the northeast corer of 19th Street and Hermosa Avenu,2 - APN 202- 191 -13, 14 and 23. Curt Johnston, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. James Chase, part owner ;f the sites on items 0 and P (northeast corner of 19th ad statedn that 7'LM" )is an3 appropriate hland e � useand compat o ible with adjacent area. Richard Dickason, Lincoln Properties, addressed items M and N (north side o'r 19th west of Archibald) and stated that the developer of this site had redesigned his project to be compatible with existing General Plan and Development Code requirements and that this design would be presented to tie City Council at their next meeting. He stated that Medium High is an appropriate designation for this site and requested that no action be taken at this hearing. Bruce Ann Hahn, 9910 Lavine, Rancho Cucamonga resident, suggested that the site at 13th and Hermosa be reduced to Low. Additionally, 19th and Archibald should be designated to be more compatible with the surrounding area. There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Item K Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Chitiea, unanimously carried, to adopt the Resolution rec =ending approval of General PI,n Amendment. 84 -02 A to amend the General Plan Land Use Map from Medium-High northwest Residential toofedium Residential for 4.96 acres of land, located at Street and Beryl Avenue - APN 201- 221 -08. Item L Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by Barker, unanimously carried, to adopt the Resolution recommending approval of District Change 84 -02 A, requesting a Mei ign, to Medium for 4.96 cre change located�at the Onorthw stOco corner of 19thmStreet andgBeryl Avenue - APN 201-2215 08. Planning Commission Minutes -14- August 22, 1984 Item M Comnissioner McNiel suggested that the office designation at the northwest corner of 19th and Archibald be retained. He stated that 10 -15 years down the road, they may be needed. Commissioner Chitiea agreed. Comnoissioner Barker stated that he understood Commissioner McNiel &s position, of continuing the Office /Professional. but was not heartily in favor Commissioner McNiel reiterated his position on the need for office intersection and did stated seeathe this need� to abandon the office to designation tionJ at this time. Commissioner Renpel stated that is is a very small piece and as is too small for an office complex, but more suited for a service station or restuarant which would take a Conditioral Use Permit. Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Stout, to retain the office professional as presently designated on this site. Motion passed 4 -1 with Commissioner Barker voting no. Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Stout, unanimously carried, to adopt the Resolution recommending approval of General Plan Amendment 84 -02 B, which amends the General Plan Lind Use Map 15.75 ac igofResidential d, td edthe Residential (4 -14 du / ?ci on approximately north side of 19th Street. between Archibald Avenue and Amethyst Avenue. Item N Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by McNiel, unanimously carried, to adopt the Resolution recommending approval of District Change No. 84 -02 -3, requesting a charge in the District Designation from Medium High to Medium for approximately 15.75 acres of land located on the north side of 19th Street, between Archibald and Amethyst. Item 0 Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by Barker, unanimously carried, to adopt the Resolution recommending approval of General Plan Amendment 84 -02 -C, amending the General Plan Land Use Map from Loa: - Medium Residential and northeast office/Professional to Low Residential osa Avenue res of land, located at the Item P to adopt Motion` Moved om ending approval of McNiel, unanimously 84 -02 C, requesting the Resolution a District recommending app change in the District Oesignation from Low Medium and office/Professional to Planning Commission Minutes -15- August 22, 1984 Low for 11.23 acres of land located at the northeast corner of 19th Street and Hermosa Avenue. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS Q. REVIEW 84 -32 - The development or an industrial complex totaling iZ3,UUU square feet on 8 acres of land in the General Industrial /Rail Served category (Subarea 5), located at the northwest corner of Center Avenue and 5th Street - APN 209- 201-25_ Linda Daniels, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report and stated that most concerns of the Design Review Committee had been addressed with the exception of the colors proposed for the building. She explained that the Design Review Committee had stated a preference that the concrete remain in the natural grey color; however, the applicant expressed preference to paint the grey surface. Chairman Stout stated that there was one other issue discussed in Desion Review relating to the use of fluted concrete block on the connecting walls, which the applicant had agreed to provide. Pete Pitassi, representing the applicant, addressed the Commission stating that he would agree to providing the fluted concrete block on the connecting walls. He stated agreement with the staff report and the Resolution with the exception of the applicant's desire to paint the non - sandblasted exterior surfaces rather than leave it in its natural concrete state. He advised that this would give the building a more uniform color. Additionally, he advised that the applicant was V.axible on the accent colors and would accept the Commission's suggestions. Commissioner Rempel stated that there are two things wrong with painted surfaces; they require more maintenance and at some time will need to be repainted, at which time a different exterior color might b:• selected. He suggested that if the applicant desired a darker grey, he could add more concrete to the mixture. Chairman Stout stated that he thought the accent colors would be on the fluted concrete but that the flat surfaces would be sandblasted. Mir. Gomez stated that during discussions in Design Review it was determined that fluted ccncr,�te would go around the office portions of the building with the remainder to be sanblasted and the color accents would be around the fluted concrete. Additionally, that only the colored reveals would not be sandblasted. Chairman Stout agreed with Commissioner Rempel and preferred sandblasting to the painted surface. Further, he liked the fluted concrete used as an accent and would lik- to see a condition added requiring the use of the fluted concrete block on the connecting walls. Additionally, he suggested that the orange and purple color hues be deleted from the applicant's suggested color palette. Planning Commission Minutes -15- August 22, 1984 Motion: Moved by Rem;pl, seconded by Stout, unanimously carried to issue a Negative Declaration 'and adopt the Resolution with additional conditions stating that all exterior flat surfaces of co•icrete be sandblasted, orange and purple hues be deleted from the accent Colo- palette, and that the block on the connecting wails be fluted block. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, STOUT, BARKER, CHITIEA, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried R. PARK AND RECREATION FEES FOR TRACT 12414 - A -M COMPANY Rick Gomez, City Planner, advised the Commission that this item had been placed on the Agenda at the request of the A -M Company for the Commission's consideration regarding the percentage of park credit for open space. Additionally, explained the limitations under- the current Ordinance and *_hose under the recently adopted Ordinance 105 -C which would be effective September 1, 1884. Gary Mitchell, representing the A -M Company, addressed the Commission and explained that the applicant was requesting partial credit for private open space for this project. He stated that one level of neighborhood parks would be provided for residents and requested a favorable consideration of gran!` nq a fee reduction for this project. John Sauer, president of A -M Company. addressed the Commission requesting favorable consideration in this request. He stated the problem with Ordinance 105 -C is the 3 acre minimum which limits the ability in other areas within the city that would allow developers to provide neighborhood park facilities. Jeff Sceranka, 6211 Phillips, Rancho Cucamonga, addressed the Commission stating that neighborhood parks which are used by residents and are maintained through their homeowner's associations do minimize the use of the larger parks and they allow for different types of uses by the residents of the community. He advised that when Ordinance 105 -C was reviewed by the City Council, they stated that if legislation changed they would be inclined to reconsider their position on the minimum 3 acres. He stated that he had seen park concepts such as that proposed by this project and that they further the cause to bring those in the community closer together. Lowell Gomes, 8772 Vivero, Rancho Cucamonga, agreed with Mr. Sceranka and stated that a project such as this would should be allowed to provide parks at the minimum. Chairman Stout asked Mr. Hopson what authority the Commission has in this matter. Planning Commission Minutes -17- August 22, 1984 .. 'Ir. Hopson advised that the Commission has the power to make this decision under Ordinance 105 -3 which is the current, effective leaal ordinance in the City until superseded by Ordinance 105 -C, which is not effective until September 1, 1984. He further advised that the Commission could decide under 105 -B or refuse to decide under 105 -B based on City Council' action on adopting 105 -C. Chairman Stout stated that he would have preferred Community Services Director Bill Holley to provide the Commission with some guidelines on which to base their decision and could not just grab a number out of the air. Commissioner Barker stated that the City Council had given the Commission direction by adopting Ordinance 105 -C which would conie into effect in another week and a half and did not feel comfortable with making any other decision. Mr. Hopson advised that under the current Ordinance, the credit can only be given by the Planning Commission. Motion: Moved by RE,..,. -: seconded by McNiel, carried, to grant a 30 percent credit for the project. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, MCNIEL, CHITIEA NOES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, STOUT ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried Commissioner Barker stated that he could not take action based on direction by Council through adoption of Ordinance 105 -C. Chairman Stout stated that more information should have been provided on which to base the decision. ADJOURNMENT Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Rempei, unanimously carried, to adjourn. 12:40 a.m. - Planning Commission Adjourned Respectfully submitted, Rick Gomez Deputy Secretary Planning Commission Minutes -18- August 22, 1984 W,: LJ y✓c CITY Or RANCHO CUC.MMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: October 10, 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner 19-Ii SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT 12490 - AME•RICAN NATIONAL - Reapplication for Design Review of site plan and architectural changes for 121 condominiums on 6.1 acres of land, located on the east side of Vineyard, south of Foothill. This item was reviewed by the Design Review October 4, 1984 meeting. The Design Review Comm the architectural changes were quite significant the item be continued to the October 24, 1984 meeting to aliow the applicant time to work with Committee's concerns RG /jr Committee at their ittee determined that and recommended that Planning Commission staff to address the 1 E-!4 A E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 10, 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Linda 0. Daniels, Associate Planner 197 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84 -39 - FORECAST - The development of a 18,500 sq. ft. office buildino on 1.1 acres located at the south side of Civic Center Drive, east of Haven Avenue in the Industrial Park (Subarea 7) District - APN 208- 622 -38. 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Purpose: Construction of a 2 -story 18,500 sq. ft. office building. C. Location: The south side of Civic Center Drive, east of Haven Avenue. D. Parcel Size: 1.1 acres. E. Existing Zoning: Industrial Park. F. Existino Land Use: Vacant. G. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant, Industrial Park (future Civic Center) (Subarea 7). South - Office building under construction, Industrial Park (Subarea 7). East - Vacant, Industrial Park (Subarea 7). West - Vacant, Industrial Park (Subarea 7). H. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Industrial Park. North - Industrial Park. Soutri - Industrial Park. East - Industrial Park. West - Industrial Park. ITEM B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Environmental Assessment for DR 84 -39 - Forecast Page 2 I. Site Characteristics: The site is presently vacant with no substantial or unusual vegetation existing on the property. Street improvements on Civic Center Drive are already existing. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The developer is requesting an environmental assessment for the construction of a 2 -story professional office building of about 18,500 square feet. The site is located east of Haven Avenue and does not fall into the area proposed for the Haver. Avenue Overlay District. The subject property is part of a master planned Industrial Park complex. The proposed office use is a permitted use in Subarea 7 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. The street improvements and drive approaches are already existing and the vacant site presently drains to the south and east. The Proposed development will not alter this drainage pattern. The development plans also show that adequate off- street parking facilities will be provided. B. Impacts: Development of the project will generate additional traffic and increase the amount of water runoff from the Property. However, these increases are insignificant since the surrounding streets and drainage facilities have been installed - and there will be adequate parking facilities to handle the expected project increases. V. RECOMMENDATION: Based upon site analysis and the Initial Study, this project will not cause significant adverse impacts on the �. environment. Staff recommendation is for the issuance of a Negative Declaration. Respectfully submitted, Rick Gomez City Planner RG:LD:ns Attachments: Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Initial "A" °B" "cat "D" "E" Stu - Location Map - Site Plan - Building Elevations - Conceptual Landscape Plan - Grading Plan dy, Part I g- D- 2 ; HILL `cu h'-- - - - . al*l. �FUTUC -E C *o *c CITY OF RAI\CI -:O CU(:A,-\-IONGA PI ANNING . DIVISION I EMS ITEM: Dk OR -39 TITLE: 4066 /ON it(�FP LXHIRM "�1 h SGILE- !8 -3 V NORTH K PROJECT DATA ...a A{ MY(AMII' \ � � • P ",_T I .. f p9t _ <OA ti m 1]�fafl� _ p i \ c / 1 �.wu <vG fo�NC�Lp, +r 1v60 WA�OPV w�Oq Y ��^/_♦ DETAILED SITE PLAN CITY OF RANCHO CUC1 \,ION( (;A PLANNING DIVISIO \' VIA♦ T MAP \ "10rt 1C6T wi.`. CL \�p� fIL�M Mme. nQT �i Q�Ya�Anp \ a 2 Z ITEM: DR ?4 -3g TITLE: SITE AaAl EXHIBIT: v SG1Lf- r G� NORTH '.... r NORTH/EAST WEST • `'fOd OfIA \m ILLUSTRATIVE BUILDING ELEVATIONS �r=- CITY OF RANCHO �Q CUC1NIONG A PLANNING D1\11q, o\ ITI.N I: _ DR sq- SOl-rH NORTH TITLE: Y-/,P/A(& Jq9vAlr/e%s M !/ EM iu1rr: _ g -s CONCEPT UAL LANDSCAPE PLAN CiT `i' OF RANCHO CUC.A j\,ION'GA PLANNING DI\IISiO \i i E PLANT LIST rats O— u�aw��s*w.c -cu. O- -.r...c..auoe�. u�u.z.crc�c o-- moR.nmu IYNiD4` Ip"J. CY9� WwYtIM AbDO{MlCw11� %TR !.e ...wz v. �1 wOYir011fr rot LnOUtt.V1� �wO�R NORTH I Tf\1: _iDQ 94 -33 TITL1:-- CONCEOTUf$L LF�NO�P PLAhI L \111 BIT: .- 'J40 0- SCALE: 46 - 6 E i/ GRADING PLAN .�o CITY OF RAINCI iC CUCA NIONGA Pi UNNiNG DIVISION' TITLE: C:�� INORTH 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUC= .*dONGy INITL,L STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFCRHATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assess_nent Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must b3 completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department whore the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of tl.e Initial Studv. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days nefcre the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Com•nittee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplieca by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposea project. PROJECT TITLE: �� ✓L� �v�17^,¢p� APPLICANT'S N;LMIE, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: 987 -'77595 NAM, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: ,l1e ]YJ/J? /%f' ✓'S 2Cs4i?F�S 9�7- lo�r6°I LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) LIST OTHER PERt -1I'=S NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FECERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: E. I -1 0 PROJECT DESCR:PTIC`. DESCRIPTIC'i OF P3OJEC ^_ : ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE Or EXISTING AND P =OPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: A /,qe,p , DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONML :TAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PL. -NTS (TREES) , ANI:ALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, ARID THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SSE ^_S) Is the project of cumulative may as z- whole Ae part of a 'Larger project, one of a series actions, trhich although i ndividuall_, sr-all, have sic nificant envircnmental it -Pact? I -2 WILL TIHIS PROJECT: Y=S NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? _L 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? 3. Create a substantial change in demand for :aunicinal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? S. Remove any existing trees? How many? _ 6.; Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanaticn of anv YES answers above: I2rDORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential unit j, complete the form c. the next page. E CERTIFICAZlr)N: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above ai.d in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adaquate evaluation can be :Wade by the Development Review Cor.,.tittee. Date Title I- 3 J 11 E E. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 10, 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission PROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TIME REVIEW 83 -05 - ►9n i,rvr,iri_rv1 - +ne aeveiopmenz OT a 411,000 square root warehouse distribution facility on 23.8 acres of land in the Heavy Industrial (Subarea 15) category located on the south side of 7th Street, approximately 1,045 feet west of Etiwanda Avenue. Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 6658. I. BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting a time extension for Deve opment Review 83 -05 as described above and as shown on the attached exhibits. The project was originally approved on April 13, 1983 and expires on October 13, 1984. The applicant is requesting the time extension in order to complete the plar checking and building permit process which is now in progress. Ii. ANALYSIS: A review of the development plans indictes that the project is consistent with the current development standards of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. The current Development Code allows for a four -year approval period with the appropriate extensions. A copy of the original Resolution of Approval with Conditions is attached for your review. III. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that a time extension of sir months be granted for this project. The new expiration date would be April 13, 1985. Respectfully submitted, Rick Gomez City Planner RG:DC:ns Attachments: Letter from Applicant Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Industrial Area Specific Plan Exhibit "D" - Master Plan. Exhibit "E" - Elevations Resolution of Approval No. 83 -52 Resolution for Time Extension ITEM C Oltmans CrNS7AU'Cr.OY CWAPANY September 27, 1984 rr. City of Rancho Cucamc aga Department of 'ommuiAty Development 9340 Baseline Rancho Cucamonga, California Attention: Mr. Dan Coleman Re: Commerce Industrial Park Gentlemen: As agent for the owner, Etiwanda Investment Co., regarding the Commerce Industrial Park building at 12645 7th. Street, request is hereby made for extension of Resolution No. 83 -52 approving development review No. 83 -05, in orJer to complete the plan check and subsequent permit which is now in progress. Enclosed is a check for $62.00 as requested. Very truly yours, OLTMANS CONSTRUCTION CO. PJS /sc cc: Ted Zwicker Enclosure 51 6 MOntetey Pass Road. rAontere)r Pck, CC"Ornio 91754 a (d! 8) 5 ?6.8474 r Lmcertse No. BA,393 El 11 . �. Ll ,. L._ bwu n •c v v -� nc El ..,_.. - Ic C V NORTH CITY OF ITEM: IcUb —4P,!S3-p5 �I P'k'N HO CUCA' - GA s�-rE PO JLLk PLAINTNTI \G DIVNON EXHIBIT: SOLE: ••m•••• e -y 1] 120' R.O.1 ao® 100' P.O., 88' or loj RAIL SERVICE _ : Existing Proposed TRAILS /ROUTES 0000 Pedestria 000* Bicycle Regional Multi -Use A^• Special S - °"`• Landsca; Power Ll Utility Ea Creeks b n Bridge � i- Access Points 0 40(3 800 1E00 NORTH CITE' OF rrE.Nl: Og R�TNC -HO CUCAMONGA -nTu: 5MeiOmic, PuAKF PLANNING DIVLS N EXHIF3iT =SCALE= e -s PARCEL I PIC'N $AvE DI ST RIeUTION U�1DCR CDVSTRUGTION e00D00 E RC�_AIL � l $ / 1 t i I i i Fl;"E I DKTR:M:O� / � I ! DIST / CsPAN$:ON I 411,000 SF 207,00051 ! M TRIEU.I 000 SE EXPANSION 207000 SF PARKING f e}ew k ak 5&'57o% OLSr 11 rX0W1 'a % S;l s5 �r DISTRI13UTION 414000 SF i 7:'; i - - — T - ' ' i iii I I i PARKING i 1 I DIST. L IOO,OGO S 1 9 1 FE all RCT•11L � I r: RETAIL RETAIL PARKING I. (� 4 .REST ! REST - ^Ir REST !'HANK co !o!' `aA " �w AMA CITY OF ITEM: -��� •�� RANCHO CUCATMO`TGA TITLE: M Ae;7!w — PLANNING DItrFON EXIilBiT =SCALE. a - (o i NURTH CJ L] O "�L I i- I. I I� F m a m i Z F 7 a m -I I ME li i i f�) :i i_ u F m O a 3 n 0 11'..1 u.0 u!'!I ® CITY OF RANCHO CUCANXIONGA Trru. PLANNING DIN SIGN EYHIBrr =_ _SCALE- •�•�� t RESOLUTION NO. 83 -52 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 83 -05 LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 7TH STREET, WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE IN THE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL ZONE (SUBAREA 15 WHEREAS, on the 18th day of February, 1983, a complete application was filed by Etiwarda Invest'Ment Company for review of the above - described project; .nd WHEREAS, on the 13th day of April, 1983, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above - described project. follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as SECTION 1: That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed; and 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the Is public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance; and - 4. That the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on April 13, 1983. SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 83 -05 is ,-)proved subject to the following con itions and attached Stancard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. Revised elevations shall be submitted for the office portions of the building which indicate the use of a textured treatment such as sandblasted concrete or a textured form liner, to the satisfaction of the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. 13 E G Resolution No. 83 -52 Page 2 ENGIYEERING DIVISIOtl 2. All pertinent conditions of Parcel Map 6658 shal apply. 3. The pavement width along 7th Street shall be a minimum of 32 -feet within the 40 -foot right -of -way. 4. If Parcel Map 7951 is recorded prior to issuance of building permit, then only 7th Street improv:ments shall be required. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF APRIL, 1533. PLANNING C6aMi'SSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCWONGA �/ � BY: !/ Dennis L. Stout, Vice- chairman r ATTEST: � Secretary tam 'he P anniTirCommis I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adoptee by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of April, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, JUAREZ, STOUT NONE BARKER, REMPEL i � t _M - T ✓ _ _ CC CG qL0 L _ VC [: a i An _.° V � N .• yq _ pGNIV•J fr L � NO n- i nS _ r •a -� J fOi u L A N N N !•. L L r_ li'A � V V N J O T ✓ N � � T q V O 0 a V G V� A E u V O• C C L .Ni. J N .•[ d O �� C i V u. a q N L N �c oc is ?_�' ^L•'c"i c •'>' c F q c <N _-N_ O U S G � Q M r L q p q`�= C N° G q L 6 E 0 6 N L y y 4 ✓? O y '• N � 6_ O _ L L O. NOr Hc.°..0 >i C`�j r i✓ q.L+ q.L+U A p 'Ep r ^C -JnOq Cq q O 9V u_ O .�_ N? �✓Z J iCU L U C° C N � q V� q J � L� 9� O N ✓ C J V i P C� O VHq JP :2 d qL9 OCq C ` �° rCq� UL ��A L F .Vii �Y� ✓C O` �.VVj+C7G 0. L N P.L.. V •+ ✓ � 1 O a Q L t L O 4r l C q V q PO _ PCN C L ✓'� N +_ ♦.� °yN qd �CLG C O A N � O Y. ° q L✓ � � C am` j 0 q j d q d_ i C 1`✓ V Q � q y 6�° O °` C V L . 'L. •.• O > ...._ � a V_ p° C ✓ q _ q C _ O • l'^ C ^ j N 7 q V C •". q + O N L l O N 6 J`O „iLy L✓ �_ Mr✓ ` Td✓ � od = -= ems.. p.d. oY �L � _o Acv Nti rN�� `cY PO pLl y` • At Sr PO �0� + ✓LC V+ ry VV =a Cry oC06 yVC CF,' O•.. `„� C V VO C -d0 '^V - J?VVCa ~q rc° •O :: " �5 °° i� °A° i `� �oN yaW LE qo c °o° oc qc ° ° °4' ygcP OvV •~i�EPy ^C9 ��� 0 JiV ° =- L C= a9V JL G^ + =.+ C -L• T6L- -O _ =q.r N .. V L NL yL q ^O nN jIWA _ p < _ _ O 6 n 6Va SAptp N a A�m 4L I-pM �.Lr.p Ha NO „Aq 6V 3 pry q�q O.Nn ... IJ1 t C r q y v� q a q✓ O q° 1 � Tpe _�•+ Tc9i �i +VV VN `'C■ a A 9 - O L O° t L q 6r L V °✓ W _ V V _y CAS Nd yA• �V�i �nL ° O✓ O N _ q r .V.. a OL.. j •V. LO d p.J ✓ C V g V 9 9 j6 me p� jTd W ^ ✓y Q =a = t �P LVAV b -� ^ C C C q C ✓ C L q O O. N ^ �L._ V�E L y � O C O ✓+ c L°' � N aiem BEN LNW. _ °c 4w°.a Ayeb �w0 aqc a W�q S y V Lcc ._N� 9 PEC 90iaO yV= O O i dl GP Pnv OC Coir =VLG 1 ° _ O> — La_ 6 V a y� C L p » ✓O N _N G C u „ S 7 ✓ 61 c C c V C 6_ V Y C q> O A G P p O' C T N ast �• i_q y_ anp� c^ =pc_ " �•d• v �` c N 4 j o f q^ � N` ce _�' L V s yy A b p C V Y C O eW� FyOj p ✓. •. 6 6 JI A V � t� J C L O. � � O ¢ V� < N+ O V Q. O A �O r f W � O Y �~ J � N � C] � N /•J V WE Z C-/C> Cl E E N ` O 6 �O V q q L = q� L 9� r C O V ° A q ° N^. C9' n G � qN U ° cc C V_ r-tq ? 6°N JL�`111111 A G O o q V c a V� N p c y n - V A t v L t — E C a Ern qCL dL P sYc r N ` •q � 4 YL d q YO OaV PA` 6 �t P z 9 v n J C- 6 a N d w a i G c 0 O 9 c P JL 9 p S °d 9 ` ON 6G U A O .L. AV L^ c s J Y 69 _aGI 6 - y 6� L n a G= d� y q `.fir `L7 N ✓ G u N q ° N d l C C - � s e O G U H y L U.Lr� O 2 q O Y G SVO� VV9 N � ` e� + cad T j VVO�d ��N A � N 6 r P a c 0 N A P'y C U 6 .a 6p °N A C Py r A_ L t y M U dvq O 9 O r •�• `• u N Y q =+ a F a'c +'uY 9n N o par C 9� G Q 6 W _d_y9 OG 1L q v r� q Li r E � O ✓ C V -�•JY L-• N7 q A C 'a ^cr u yyAO.aL = 6•J q d d Y d QY + O q p y = MLO ngP�N c rretP2 _ Pad v W dnOGt til JJ � _.Vi�O.J��O�L•O L Y Y C = �pA N C 9 N F > - V O r q��✓ O O Y c p g C d 9 F q✓ l -✓ T I V V W W V „ L L W W LI l �p'`r Q Z ` `L G V N CCY qPl. V V V � l^ Q 6 O OIWU A -, O_°9UC� OdT� ✓V = v� ° q r F ra ALC ° j °.Niw3�� ✓� V ✓ y c �Oye.F a.-an A =-J = ° V N N[ o o � r - - rQQOVq d6 Y E E ° Od -i 6 ` O r q'p f_C VONO N � P N ✓C Y L Y V V �N _ 6A VL d �O✓ C .O. C C ° 9Cr NNd °Nr C�a °LE C L LCV, c cpCaY•, ° q C�M° . ° V V = O. CqA �O 6Y✓ N t0 _r V T� - 4o��rc q� T ° ° ( =_pad_ (E� e e� L �v.q. a cN :°-� Y ao ✓ -hVl C __ ✓ Ti _ G q G e O -L9 ..^ V � a ✓ 7Jr VL °NO ✓` L r� O N J V � I- OI rl N ` O 6 �O V q q L = q� L 9� r C O V ° A q ° N^. C9' n G � qN U ° cc C V_ r-tq ? 6°N JL�`111111 A G O o q V c a V� N p c y n - V A t v L t — E C a Ern qCL dL P sYc r N ` •q � 4 YL d q YO OaV PA` 6 �t P z 9 v n J C- 6 a N d w a i G c 0 O 9 c P JL 9 p S °d 9 ` ON 6G U A O .L. AV L^ c s J Y 69 _aGI 6 - y 6� L n a G= d� y q `.fir `L7 N ✓ G u N q ° N d l C C - � s e O G U H y L U.Lr� O 2 q O Y G SVO� VV9 N � ` e� + cad T j VVO�d ��N A � N 6 r P a c 0 N A P'y C U 6 .a 6p °N A C Py r A_ L t y M U dvq O 9 O r •�• `• u N Y q =+ a F a'c +'uY 9n N o par C 9� G Q 6 W _d_y9 OG 1L q v r� q Li r E � O ✓ C V -�•JY L-• N7 q A C 'a ^cr u yyAO.aL = 6•J q d d Y d QY + O q p y = MLO ngP�N c rretP2 _ Pad v W dnOGt til V� V Orr N^ � q O N V ✓✓ O C V -O '-C, c_ n H O ^L-• = O O ` 4 t nL�V✓ O N Qi.L.6V yl N✓ N 4� - OG 6Er6 �L °O L° p. +[ gNLr+ C � G� N •y rf f N b 41 P N q r w L L Y Y C C d N N C 9 N F > - V O 1 C d 9 F q✓ l -✓ T I V V W W V „ L L W W LI l Q Z ` `L G V O.r N •. � y T ° V V V V � l^ Q 6 O OIWU A V C ✓V = v� ° °9'(.'• O = ° V N N[ o o � P9 L Y Y E E ° Od -i 6 ` O r q'p f_C VONO N � P N ✓C Y Y V V �N _ `V O °L rIQV q .O. C C ° =✓q C C L LCV, c cpCaY•, ° q C�M° . ° V V = r ` _r V E N , q� T ° ° ( (E� e e� L T Q Q r -hVl C ` L ` ,L V .q+ J J V q�VE V V N ° fW � W�LiL O Ou±�j ✓q° N � � ° � - - c cVL W ANE Y -'ao✓ � �° ° ° c c + +ro=J � � r r ° °NC4 � ��•`,�a A YI - V -boy r - o V - O C C 7 N N✓ f f > > P P G C° O O C � O . 0 = � O ' 6✓.- y ✓ I VCO r J 1 ✓ � C . 0 = � ' 6 y ✓ I T O L H H _ ° LiL � � � 1 1 _ V N c °.o..2ia � LL a a L o W cL ° � - -. L o � � o+ W oar O O`d —r c c : :L « «°ago .n v A .: r r•y qc -�� g goVY y —cc O✓ V v � �N A . O A A•+ N N P O d V V r ^ .T. P O O N �l a N d✓ V = V ` ` � = r ^ = = . O�- • L N O C N 0 6 L N p p G� O cN -o C C ` N P - .e j L p. CL C V_ r v r •' Lo c` M U � p N O G p � V U C nr L O L N T G 9 Q C ^ _ LC O O +_ O o° d ' n� d_ A ' N� O C p u' O� i s c� L U v q O c e N' U p P P J 7 - N� l p a N p P p N ? O c- to L ^ C d O t C O V nl vdl q�>o g C 0 i r M p 9E O O N u c P — n C O O .e q ° ao 4 c 7 O N n' u •� L 7 r N o � d 0 V C q i V e o O 6 r i V. c^ d p G d ^J O ^ L A J q L W O C ul r6 ci.-. N c OLD Y .� L P •. .- W i L ^ L A J P L v^ a W 7 L +•- y c OLD Y ` 4 C U N C L q• 9 l S V N O = M O O J O C O 7 8 7 1 � D . 6 V M 9 L' q OD° 9 uCp 0 1 � � �C O N � „n46' O V?.'nn q tOp qy . O.wp + W V N r q G � V V .L... U U •FG - � o � y L� =rNi " v cn �u T J q�NU p3 C- _ _ iPC NR D rP .. q_O •r d ^N VL 1-8 V dC C V 'J LYU �v I q � L,.L d _6f Ol Y9 Vim' q r j ZC qr r T 5t YE- Ny0 r_ JV VLD C TON C�� N9 . '- V YCV�c� N`^ V_ c 6 �Y V cnq.N _ n O 'OL r= V ca .=rrgrl O Q V V p- • d m ' ^fin O�qY �u .c VOO 0 •C n L V p n N vF Oi L^ Np V Y 4(p VC ° paQ � „ODU PC.L... °va� V6 TOL Il II uEZ PVOL �d �"C 6Y p LaYV NDV d> L`L q 9 =O6r V= L N .� L P •. .- W i L ^ L A J P L v^ a W 7 L +•- y q 4 C U N C L q• 9 l S V N O = M O O J O C O 7 8 7 1 � D . 6 V M 9 L' q - D 0 1 •_-- r � �C O N � „n46' O V?.'nn q tOp qy . O.wp r�1ao -•„ ° 6 '^ oti � o � y L� =rNi " v cn �u T q�NU p3 C- _ _ iPC NR D rP .. q_O •r d ^N VL dC � JVn_y �v I � L,.L d r Ol Y9 Vim' q r j ZC qr r T bPd ^r r_ JV VLD C TON C�� N9 . '- V YCV�c� dry cnq.N _ n vt c.vo Tro_N ca np cr d m `� ^fin nLP V.n „ODU Cc d LNq PVOL ('q p•J 9u NDV d> L`L q 9 =O6r V= L N `dtr.UV V OC Pr_% d 8009= D_ ql LrV O N �P> �� Mj •O O V O � O D l= P V V � L LU L •-w -rrgq L E r p0 .L.r P NOC �_ L q y0 L •J N r J U L L P L ..r rno -• t q -.. V q O.� cr R� G = C N L ^ xII{ CNV] dOC NN Vi W PnOE VVP u.Nr qF. '^> WCC y Vc qq- °qN Lyd60M LT- TIC O.Li�r _VIM dL� �U!fi 01w 9 `nay OC G N N- r�-- ,L qa qY= W yY NL- r V W Cwa EN �-- iVyu.' -_ 9Vq C- /a CIO E p'Y m ^ N 1uOL 7 P `✓ � ^JLrdp C V p L O N C v •_ O E _ O i V 7 J' L° .• V ` .n V C� N _ .� v_ va ° oyr m r o ° L•• _o _ 9csd' cY cam^ ; g N •J q N r n O V 'J a j C C � �•� G� .J i =r V O'er p�� O N r r` ` V r C C pJ VO c VCO V N q V SOJ` C L ". � •_f C O��VL.f C. _ ._ F, GAO— Gm su o_• a� n v aE =N..N L> �:JCE _'.^`e j� w� min °oL yC.°.. a `p J9r� r ^��m.� ='r r•1 ^i r q •_J G_ CN�rL pN� p•'uM° Vv � .Ui.p� .nr •• yl c6- r �� q O1 ^._yam J'm +`_. .'. -oqM yo e:5�4z c ^ r ap cE. ri° -car v -so °cc Mart_ _ .y. _..onL qi Ma L pO�. ._ ° O yj cc_. -. o -.' C C 0 V �� v i n— _?_ •_ ..: � J O._ _ q y a s y. .°n .T. r O _ d — O—Oy �� OAS +F^ aOLL 60 OO'q O —; V= O NVCN 4 e0 Nf O� Imo:/ UI` VI J _ py_ •-J O U L P °ppG O2Ve 9a�OW VCyd �m L LV �N E O Vd v ^Cam •.�6 —E�P ��L� OLO �� � r3•'.^ ^ °9"=V rO GVV9i 4 p.. r9 ^ 2 9 .C- V O Y V JL V d J C V Y = LG Vq V9N P.= NLy V E ` Y V V V O.O 0 •yOj y q a �. w f. O C N l0` N •+ y O N Oy° VO VN C. CAA L •C6 LR � PU 3l au •J� gO6ai Vd �yL J �� TO Vq 9C��O m L9O _ �W�` VC e9 YOV�4 •_� ^C ..-� r9r�V EyV ^eLC V e C p r •n �— N T e C O� .� J .'n P J C' G o � �� 7 i C •�.n 0!- •=n o r E y ^J F d y vors ov gym- c =_ ^v v °e rv' �� L - •. L;, ^^r,p c°e.. N CF ar �y r 7Or � a O d C� � LV r b q_ JV L Ci V u r °— e � r C� Y q � L` J •J d P 1 q � ^ _r Dui co U, pL 0- PE 207 '.' Ttr 1 Ydy+^ �. •n i V4C LTV ry�9 rr . q.L... q^ cI NI e, p'Y kA. 0: NN Y: c u 0 s~ a O r P P C O d n wL c N c C � L — o _ L q � T V � y 9 V p N O =Uv 4W JL � q A L L C O V G a C O r O q 4 u a n a n o .- c E rn W Y - - 6 4 r c I Ali e a- N _ I• 4 }� �� ra iI )i 1 I �I lei 6 a I {I e: .,, oI -• Ii _ � r N C I IwI I�1 a O r P P C O d n wL c N c C � L — o _ L q � T V � y 9 V p N O =Uv 4W JL � q A L L C O V G a C O r O q 4 u a n a n o .- c E rn W Y - - 6 4 r c I Ali T U ° O a v o V � 6 q O r ° N .°. L G G O .L i .ce E 0 v t N o fC/ N E d A L W z m Q C' ->y J O.i r J v� 0 Gy _O O y r o v _ q C C T N q 9 C'i6 J9i _- Lr � f O O � p pC V n �v NV ay _ 6 _ ` a V� ` PNrO OI O O V A A d� j r O q C �J J 2 N 9 G � V r O vOU� a N q� C 9 N _ ^ O f A c E EO C Ur N ° L E V.s I V v _ e oa _ ry Q N d q � C E a c E N n i I 1" e a- N _ I• 4 }� �� ra iI .,, oI -• _ � r A v ot q L• A r U U „ •Fi, aTPN J _ qp D Nl N� V� 3 oL �,LiL Ld�om c• V '•' T y � V y y,. q L V L G e aG � V Pc S GN q T.O.. y • T J .- O' L •' >. 9` P O b O <i6U _V PCB _ >O•., y v x -- G °Car V Pd Vr pd� G CC a c O E O 6 C y L > p w n D L J v p E L n T g L V L 9 d 9 1] •"c yc rc •' =�•oc u L r r _ _ r N A ,n O r O < V O W� +• L L V 3 n L°i O a r r T U ° O a v o V � 6 q O r ° N .°. L G G O .L i .ce E 0 v t N o fC/ N E d A L W z m Q C' ->y J O.i r J v� 0 Gy _O O y r o v _ q C C T N q 9 C'i6 J9i _- Lr � f O O � p pC V n �v NV ay _ 6 _ ` a V� ` PNrO OI O O V A A d� j r O q C �J J 2 N 9 G � V r O vOU� a N q� C 9 N _ ^ O f A c E EO C Ur N ° L E V.s I V v _ e oa _ ry Q N d q � C E a c E N n i I 1" e a- N _ I• 4 }� �� ra iI q L• A r U U „ •Fi, L G e 9` P O b O a —Da v a r r = I ADV o qV >c° I tea 9 ` o T U ° O a v o V � 6 q O r ° N .°. L G G O .L i .ce E 0 v t N o fC/ N E d A L W z m Q C' ->y J O.i r J v� 0 Gy _O O y r o v _ q C C T N q 9 C'i6 J9i _- Lr � f O O � p pC V n �v NV ay _ 6 _ ` a V� ` PNrO OI O O V A A d� j r O q C �J J 2 N 9 G � V r O vOU� a N q� C 9 N _ ^ O f A c E EO C Ur N ° L E V.s I V v _ e oa _ ry Q N d q � C E a c E N n i I 1" V^ a r i I AT L V Y C T+ O 9 0 y O ° u T ° - - n N N = - O � _ C r V d O= n O G - V` `mom Oy N^O yI..l = _ •tIi d V .rr,• 72Z pNOY `o c ca G 6 q N V V t _ 91 u L p C u C r G C O 7 e O V ¢I ^1 b ^ I VI c O _ O M j j o vi � e ° °I•.T. � a 3� v r c L o N+ .T. .p. v a9�,•� EoiN s - I �.m.• � s.e au 2•- Lr. - °- °-+ ca - � N it a I LJ � Vn q � I r0 °. 'N __LL �yN qy �A ^.^.• _ V ."L. O ..• I ^J -'-� .- r O - cI J 7 _ = O V i L•r C= Ain y �° L ^6 Sr N N -J I�Tq- qd•� V^ a RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING THE TIME EXTENSION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 83 -05 WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension for the above- descrihed project, pursuant to Section 17.02.100 of the Development Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above -descr ;bed project. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: A. That strict enforcement of :he conditions of approval regarding expiration, wou d not be consi,tent w th the intent of the Development Code. B. That *_here have bees no significant changes in the Lard Use Element, Industrial Area Specific Plan, Developmer, Cede, or character of the area within which the project is located. C. That the granting of said time extension will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or material'.y injurious to properties or improvements in the vici ^ity. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission h,reby grants a time extension for: Tract ADpI'._ -nt Expiraticn DR 83 -051 Etiwanda Investment Co. April 13, 1985 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF OCIOBER, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RAMCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. ,Shout, Chairman AiT.EST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary C -16 Resolution No. Page 2 I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Ran.--ho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, pEssed, and' adopted by. the Planning Co- :fission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of Vie Planning Commission held on the 10th day of October, 1984, by the follo'wirg vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: e -// 11 C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ITEM 0 i DATu Octooer 10, 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Pick Gomez, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 83 -02 - BARMAKIAN - The development of six industrial buildings, totaling 25,032 square feet, on 1.7 acres, in the General Indus;:rial category (Subarea 1), located on the north side of 8th Street, west of Vineyard Avenue - APN 207- 271 - 53,54,55. Relate files: VA -83 -02 and Parcel Map 7912. I. BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting a one year time extension for Deve opment Review 83 -02, as described above. The letter of request was received on September 20, 1984. The project was o:- iginally approved by the Planning March Commission on 23, 1984, for eighteen, months with an expiration date of September 23, 1984. Concurrently with this project approval, was the approval of Variance 83 -02, that reduced the f -ont yard setback to 27 feet and the streetscape to 25 feet. The applicant is requesting a one year time extension due to the delay in resolving a drainage condition with the adjacent property owner - Santo Fe Railroad. Although the developer has processed lan check for the project, permits have been held up because of an unresolved drainage condition, according to the developer, a new solution to the drainage problem will be submitted to the City and the Santa Fe Railroad for review and approval. II. ANALYSIS: A review of t-ie development plans and Vie building el_vations indicate that the project is consistent with current development and design standards; and that together with the Variance 83 -02, the project is consistent with the objectives of :e Industrial Specific Plan. Since the current Development Code all)ws for a 4 -year approval period, it is sugg,�,ted that a one year extension be granted for this project. A copy Of the orioinal Resolution of approval with conditions and the Planning Commission minutes of March 23, 1983, are attached for your review. Is ITEM 0 i PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Time Extension for DR 83 -02 October 10, 1984 Pace 2 III. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that a one year extension be granted for this project and that the new expiration date would be September 23, 1985. � ctfull uba�itted. O. i c k IGom.- -' ity Planner RG: cv Attachments: Letter from Applicant Exhibit 'A" - ASP and Genei-al Plan Exhibi•: 'B" - ISP Subarea 1 Map Exhibi: "C" - National Features Map Exhibi "D" - Site Plans Exhibit "E" - Building Elevations Exhibit ''F" - Grading Plan Planning Commission Staff Report & Minutes, Original Resolution of Approval Time Extension Resolution of Approval ,o -a March 23, 1583 E. L 11 September 20, 1984 `1r. Rick Gomez Clerk of Planning Commission 9320 Baseline Road, Suite "C" P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: DR 33 -02 - Extension Dear Mr. Gomez: Our firm is requesting an extension o:; Dr 83 -02 which expires on Septemb -r 23, 1984. Enclo: >ed, please find a check in the amount of $52.00 for the filing fee for the extension. We are requesting an extension because our firm has been unable to resolve a drainage condition with the adjacent property owner, the Santa Fe Railroad. A new solution to drainage condition will to submitted to the City of Rar_no Cucamonga and the railroad in early October. We anticipate that solution will be satisfactory to both the city and th,= railroad. if you have any questions, or need additional information, nleasc call. Sincerely, Scott J. Backer Vice - President SJa:sr Enclosure Foothill ' NERAL FLAN 9 Lam} 4 a _ I � ARROW i dal. o 12 c� 1es'f • FOOT14!LL ! I I RESIDENTIAL VERYLC'.7<7DUZAC LC:! 2 a Cu s AD =� LOW- MIEDIUM a aDUe AC MEDIUM <.,< D,-,: Ac O MEDIUTA- HIGH ,A -2A DU'a AC r= HIGH z,-3DDus Ac J. MASTER PLAN REQUIRED C0MMERCIAL;'0E-r10E ® COMMERCIAL = COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD COMM. C.3 REGIONAL COMMERCIAL :::':t- OFFICE INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIaL PARK GENERAL INDUSTRIAL _7 GENERAL INDUSTRIAL/ RAIL SERVED //7-'7 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL CITY OAF RANCHO CL;CATMO\TGA FLANNING 7IVISION 11 OPEN SPACE HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL OPEN SPACE ;-� FLOOD CONTROL: UTILITY CORE SPECIAL BOULEVARD I FORTH TITLE = EXHIBIT- y t_ .....-SCALE-. 4.7-5 _ 0_- / \' J ARROW i dal. o 12 Al&SF. R. R. \ y�Y - - -_mot 5i ^ST.I CITY OAF RANCHO CL;CATMO\TGA FLANNING 7IVISION 11 OPEN SPACE HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL OPEN SPACE ;-� FLOOD CONTROL: UTILITY CORE SPECIAL BOULEVARD I FORTH TITLE = EXHIBIT- y t_ .....-SCALE-. 4.7-5 _ 0_- / \' J 1: FIG. IV -1 t 1 0000000 i -Aw 000 t CIRCULATION TRAILS /ROUTES 120' R.O.W. 000 O Pp,estrian ® 10P R.O.W. 0 0 O O Bicycle W� 88' or less R.1. W. �C� Regional t Multi -use RAIL SERVICE `4= -j"� Existing �--� Bridge = t + + + +- proposed t i Access F tits 3 jAT � i �1 & SF R.R. _ t CIRCULATION TRAILS /ROUTES 120' R.O.W. 000 O Pp,estrian ® 10P R.O.W. 0 0 O O Bicycle W� 88' or less R.1. W. �C� Regional Multi -use RAIL SERVICE -j"� Existing �--� Bridge = t + + + +- proposed Access F tits O 400' _00' 1600' Note: Parcel tines and lot conligirations are shown as approximation only. to CITY OF RA\CHO CUCAXIO\rCA PLNINNING DIl.1RONN 0 O O _ O O 1 O Subarea 2 • U ,eesa O✓ ! ..A• "' Creeks ;& Channels m Park' Special Streescape/ ^M. Landscaping J 'The sites shown may not be currently owned nor is the k7cation site specitc, The depiction of a sue 1J an vnlication of a projected future need !tat may be a47usted over time as the City develolap. i V NORTH fTEI t: 7M f 3 -aL ?TTI.E= iNOtrIKIAI 15PFQFie- EYI iIBM "_ SCALE7_�! - . ,d S /00,' txw. zoo / �!!!'Ri9c%�i � 11 � KL9v10 LN01 � =y�� pRgw� la • • /- � a — - Ir Slog a..a,got[sm[k,... r — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAX10 \TGA PLANNING DINrM- t Ell im"Noomom c"" \ �n000 cowrnod craw LEGEND 1� NORTH ITE•rl: X83 -cL TITLE- gr./m -- FFsvr?zF� EXHIBIT- "G" SG3LE- -t1�._ 0 ^•• t t 2 ...c BM 3 .. 9i0} G . 9105. 5 cj Al ! 1 1 — I _�.'�'�� 1 y.w a...a p �., _ �C.T' � � li. �� I I I I.+.a• �[ i1 � ' . CITY Or, INCEO R- A CUCATMONGA PLANNING DIViS ON C NORTH ITa1: R,-? -0Z TITLE: 12 - ML Ee r,� EYHII31T: "D" SCALE: a -7 1TY 4 :f�l.p.y ... i.4.Y i 6.•V. m.lt� .r �. � .w�v �. aw rl •mr. CITY Or, INCEO R- A CUCATMONGA PLANNING DIViS ON C NORTH ITa1: R,-? -0Z TITLE: 12 - ML Ee r,� EYHII31T: "D" SCALE: a -7 • 1 Lt. -11 r t E] —J t tlaMea>aalat ant. at lealeU -_ — �r.��.�I .-. ti"'�". � - __ter ..__ -- -�... � _►.. - _ Fr- _1 a 1 . . I F y4 ` C rl.: '�- •'r ('•,'�1 n.>+a1 t/r r• ` . � C / -�ra ata BlD4f ��� '�' / F BL',�G2 9LDU�� 1 r ..i - 'r(tBLDG.0 �BLDG.S � T '. SL �• iU- Lr a ... EIGHTH STREET . - — _ _ • ... w W r. Awl �� MYMa[C f.(wnrP _ �r • ��4r rr w[� I•nlwM •_.A.�wr... w..��ww�ww. catatx e:noc ICTaratoryy CITY OF �Ri AINC} IrO�rCL,'C T TONGA CLAINIV'11N >.rr L':`I- SION FORTH InL .: -- Examr: "F" ,D -9 F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL ?11AP 7912 - HAHN TENANT INTERIORS. INC. - A division of 1.57 acres into 3 parcels for condominium ourpcses ;within Subarea 1 of the Industrial Specific Plan located on the north side of 8th Street, west of Vineyard Avenue - APN 207 - 271 -53, 54, & 55. G. VlIRIP.NCE 83 -02 - 6WLC - A request to reduce the required front yard setback and streetscape in conjunction with the development of six industrial buildings on 1.57 acres located on the north side of 8th Street, west of Vineyard Avenue - APN 207- 271 -53, 54, & 55. H. ENVIROPMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 83 -02 - BWLC - The deveiopment of six industrial buildings totaling 25,032 square feet on 1.57 acres cf land in the General Industrial category (Subarea 1) located on the north side of Pth Street, west of Vineyard Avenue - APN 207 - 271 -53, 54, & 55. Rick Gomez, City Planner, announced that these items would be heard concurrently. Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner, reviewed the staff reports. Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing. Larry 'Wolff, applicant, addressed the Commission stating that he agreed with the findings and the staff reports and conditions of approval. Commissioner Stout asked if anything would be done in the way of sound to attenuation for the units near the railroad tracks. Mr. Wolff replied that this issue has not been addressed; however, if a problem arises it would be dealt with by adding insulation. He added that s�hce the types of uses to be included in this center would be of a light industrial nature, sound attenuation is not normally a problem. Commissioner Stout stated that this is a very innovative idea and would help residents in that area to buffer them from the railroad tracks. There were no further comments, therelcise the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Barker stated that this is a ver; creative use for this piece of property. Commissioner Stout referred to the bridge at the tracks and asked where the water goes once it goes into the pipe system in Vineyard Avenue. Mr. Rougeau replied that presently at the southeast corner of this property there is a pipe that picks up the water from this property and takes it under 8th Street to a storm drain in Ontario ::hick then takes it to Cucamonga Planning Commission Minutes -5- March 23, 1983 D -/0 C Creek. Further, that in the future Rancho Cucamonga would have a master - planned drain on the north side of the tracks to intercept the wat:.r and take it straight into the creek. Commissioner Stout asked if this would be designed so that it would be adaptable to the new storm drain system. Mr. Rougeau replied that this project would have to be designed to carry much more water than they would have to in the future; however, the master - planned storm drain may be fifteen years to completion unless a lot of development occurs to help with the installation. Motion: Moved by 4arker, seconded by McNiel, unanimously carried to adopt the Resolution approving Parcel Map 7912 and the issuance of a Negative Declaration. Motion: Moved by McNiel seconded by Stout, unanimously carried to adopt the Resolution approving Variance 83 -02. Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Stout, unanimously carried to adopt the Resolution approving Development Review 83 -02 and the issuance of a "­qative Declaration. Director's Reports i. ENVIRONMENTA_ ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 82 -09 - GONZALES - The construction of a 420 square foot addition to an existing building and parking lot improvements on a 9,500 square foot lot in the C -2 zone located at the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and San Bernardino Road - APN 208 - 132 -12. Rick Gomez, City Planner, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Rempei opened the public hearing. There were no comments either for or against the project, therefore, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Stout asked if the mansard roof would be wrapped completely around the building. Mr_ Gomez replied that the proposal included all elevations except for the rear of the building. Comm,issiorer Stout asked if there was a reason for this exclusion. Planning Commission Minutes -6- J0 -// March 23, 1983 i CITY OF RANCHO CUC INIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Mar:h 23, 1983 io;, T0: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 83 -07` BWLC - The development of of six kb industrial buildings totaling 25,032 square feet on 1.57 acres of land ire the General Industrial category (Subarea 1) located on the north side of 3th Street, west of Vineyard Avenue - APN 207 - 271 -53, 54, and 55. Related Files: VA 83 -02 & Parcel Map 7912 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. fiction Requested: Approval of a precise site plan and architectural design and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Purpose: To allow the construction of six (6) industrial buildings totaling 25,032 square feet. C. Location: North side of 8th Street, west of Vineyard Avenue. D. Parcel Size: 1.57 acres E. Exi <_tina Zening: Industrial Area Specific Plan, General Industrial category (Subarea 1). F. Existina Land Use: Vacant G. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Santa Fe Railroad, vacant property, and industrial; General Industrial category (Subarea 1) South - Single Family Residential; R -1 Commercial; C -1 East - Industrial, and bar; General Industrial category (Subarea 1) West - Welding shop; General Industrial category (Subarea 1) 0 —/� 11.1 u E Development Review 1_.- 02 /3WLC ?lanninq Commission Agenda March 23, 1983 ?age 2 H. General North - South - East - West - Plan Designations: General Industrial Single Family Residential Commercial General Industrial General Industrial I. Site Characteristics: The property slopes to the southeast at approximately 2 percent. No structures, trees, or significant vegetation ?xist on the site Ii. ANALYSIS: A. General: Development of this project as proposed requires approval of Variance 83 -02, which is also on this agenda for your consideration. The average depth of the property is 97 feet, measured from the curb, wi•ile the required streetscape is 35 feet. The site plan propose- a minimum building setback of 21 feet from the curb and an average landscaping depth of 25 feet. To increase the effectiveness of the landscaping and screen the parking lot, a four foot high retaining wall will be provided along the south side of the parking area. Turf, mounding will be provided up against the retaining wall and continue along the front of the buildings. B. Desn Review Committee: The Design Review Committee worked wit h ig the applicant to resolve concerns relative to the parking lot configuration and exterior building texture. The site plan was revised to show a new location of the trash enclosure and a maximum amount of landscaping in the parking lot. Also, the applicant agreed to provide a heavy sandblasting treatment to the exterior of the building visible from public view. C. Development Review Corn, ittee: The Development Review Committee reviewed the project and determined that with approval of the corresponding Variance and recommended conditions of approval, the project is consistent with all applicable standards and ordinances. D. Gradinq Committee: The Grading Committee reviewed the project and determined that storm drainage facilities are necessary to replace an existing 40 -foot wide drainage easement across the property. Currently, water enters the property from the north via a drainage course which flogs under the railroad tracks. Development of the site will divert the runoff to the east along the south side of the railroad tracks. The Committee approved the conceptual grading plan with requirements that 0-13 Development Review O2 /3'WLC Planning Commission Agenda March 23, 1933 ?age 3 storm drain facilities be provided to protect the new development and adjacent properties from diverted runoff. The necessary improvements will be provided along the north and east project boundary and will be designed to handle a 100 -vear flood and tie into an existing drainage pipe in Sth Street. Recommended ccnditions of approval are provided for your consideration. c. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant. Staff has completed the Environmental Checklist and found no significant adverse environmental impacts as a result of this project. Development of the project will increase the amount of water runoff from the site and divert an existing drainage course. :however, these impacts are not viewed as significant because the required drainage improvements must have a 100 -year storm capacity and will actually decrease the amount of water on the stre� III. FACTS FOR zINDING: This project is consistent with the Industrial Area Specific Plan, and the General Plan. The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use, building design, and site plan, together with the recommended conditions and approvals of Variance 83 -02, are in compliance with applicable provisions of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, the Zoning Ordinance, and City standards. °V.- CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised for environmental review in The Daily Repot newspaper. V. RECOMMEND UION: It is recommended that the Planning Contnission cons er ainput and elements of this project. If after such consideration the Commission can support the facts for findings, adoption of the attached Resolution would be appropriate. lly s:bmitted, ck !Gomez ty 'Planner :CJ: jr —/7 f'J LJ C Development Review 02 /3WLC ?lanning Co-mission Agenda March 23, 1983 Page 4 Attach-ments: = xhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Initial Resolst 11 "A" - ISP and General Plan "B" - ISP Subarea 1 'lap "C" - Natural Features Map "D" - Site Plans "E" - Building_ Elevations "F" - Grading Plan Study, Part I ion of Approval with Conditions q ^, J RESOLUTION NO. 83 -46 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING CUMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 83 -02 LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 8TH STREET IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL CATEGORY (SUBAREA i) WHEREAS, on the 21st day of January, 1983, a comiplete application was filed by BWLC architects for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 233rd day of March, 1983, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above - described project. follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as SECTION 1: That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and the purposes of the zone in which the use is prop,�sed; and 2. That the proposed use, together with approval of Variance 83 -02 and the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 3. That the proposed use together with approval of Variance 83 -02 is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance; and 4. That the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on March 23, 1983. SECTION 3: chat Development Review No. 83 -02 is approved subject to the following conditions and attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. The exterior elevations facing 8th Street and the parking lots shall be finished with a heavy sandblasted treatment. Details shall be provided on the construction drawings required prior to issuance of building permits. L/ -/& ;, :i E L] 11 Resolution No. 83 -46 Page 2 EaGINEERING DIVISION 2. all pertinent conditions for Parcel Map 7912 shall apply. 3. The drainage area under the Railroad 'bridge snail be graded and paved to the satisfaction, of the Railroad and the City Engineer. 4. Drainage facilities shall be provided along the north and east project boundaries and shall be capable of handling 100 -year frequency storm through a combination of drains and surface flows with adequate inlet and outlet structures to control debris. The system shall be designed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 5. Drainage facilities shall be provided to protect adjacent properties from diverted water flows co the extent of 100 -year storms. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF MARCH, 1983. PLANNING C�.'- 11AISSIOPi- GF�-HE CITY / , ATTEST`°^ anning RANCHO CUCAMONGA ssion I, JACK LX4, Secretary of the Planning Co,-,mission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular reeting of the Planning Commission held an the 23rd day of March, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, STOUT, BARKER, JUAREZ, REMPEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NOME 0 -/7 C"^_ �"�✓ ^_ V V_C «T C^ q tea •T9r9 O � _ _ O � � r`-_ G � � A L C o G6 N �_ � ✓ u L V L f n C T O� _ O L_ 6 V_ � ga 'n V 'e ✓ r^ r _ ✓ ^ r q _q � p G_ C 'J •Tr C_' � O L u' O_ L > - O � � � C1✓ V V j° � C G A C+r ✓ q � - = N O O✓ a O V .e L ��� N O F NO =- nB F LC dv = UCq _�..r N SPdy L° ^ q W L J✓ C V Z V _ L F a ti C d q ,Lii C N Cr` CL✓C N �_ qV V'Od Nc 6C••'V9C c.6n °uo d ^' •• � o L ? u�o, -_ .d.c� �' o � ✓_oc � r _- vim• `= <c _ ^ur _�_ L _6 7V VfL z O C_N •..r ,.,l UL Cn ✓ GTd� O �` _ .SA TV✓ OrNI� q 'u L•"' V NV 3•y C L >C �' N q G C GD` �� O• n >' S✓ 'O J9 L ✓q L N q•+ � >. �> N G V P C✓ 'a Oa.°tl ,r 'J V° v ✓_ � VO qdV � 9 ✓_d VSar^ C •J d qd _ _ C'� P Q P C U C = M � C 6 A7-'Vr _ ✓C� O�C rV � •V.r 7 u V 7 C LV LC C C O S___ A 'C >r✓L .•q_ „G _N �.•. 'q q -P yO'er L V C 9 O C_ rll 9 > u a �•.dv' p• \\ /I �I •I ! I I i � � I � i V' U9�r Tq 11.6 u c J p q q r z o u o ^ q> 0 T L✓ q I a q� E� aV r L c> d _v LL W 9 °° u L � q 6✓ t_ � V✓ 9 y ✓O LV_6^ �� _ N� ✓q q ^_ 6yC ^ O O ✓ V 7 q q ^ 'DJ N ^1 r,C„` �i H Or yE V �C�LJS d 9r q d dOa q S rN S N p l• ' h y m W N N •.• � L O O d^ O a Z ^ V q Y d v N 6Vy S� YC d� Y CV Q, i In v 9 L VI '� L � O r 1'AWI1fl =I C Lao S VI 7 ✓ GI C E V P 6. W V C O O. Oda O C T C q L N 'T N G Lam^ 4q CO � L Q J) I V ` �� d V G p y 7 0 ✓ n A i L6 ° i d„@ NO � q = p •L.• O ° 1 n r o✓o _1' V'^ n °_ C pQr Jm M Er c O L O M L _' J.• _ NG =C✓ �� dr. = CV— d = C dCLO C �� ICr qy N M CL p�v ` V =Z GC yy GrgO _0 1V' 6w�OV 60 @ °^ u � J N V� •C •J. J � � N Yf 1 ° �i • N n •p I � �I /1 \ \� f 1 El I] �i 0 M r U &7 L,: �• n °nog° `° O °c�v roc -�- O IF .n _ l r 6 n. N � � L r� � L ^ r C a J O l• U 0 Ci =- cc� a c"✓,. P � - Y�o;'„p -° n_u =EGG "Ay. a r�- `�c•eu GE._�LV O:� V F r�:_c g>o C- a O N- L N •u C -J 9 C � ..r C S P 0 i i ._C° S S C 0• _� V_ O U N 6 0 ^ N V S n T C N G S^ a I= C' S -� �` V N° S U L r u f y ._ ! O C L •-"• C 6✓ 9 ni V L F. N - r 7 O L< j_ S d _ .' CC LdO aP6P'D TC dV =j 6LF C��} r_ �nV9_ .Or��'� CV N V� V Oy N�V _ T .'Jtr -O✓• uP V OTC , L _ Y J - •C C C r U C G n I _ n O� V r ✓ U L - O✓ O r V O V� l 6 V B Y O � O` �'-N a -v•�v pai .,_oi= _ >I 49+ ate. ¢ tc :- L.�n�V c 6r4A &77, �i 51 rl �l phi o W ✓'u �y r c -art _ n •r. V �O O L .� PO 6 d yVy 9CT�J[�= -Nr p� C 9 O OS9 N V O N a` C n r 9 E C r C a N L O r l y � u� ✓� r _ ✓'� d _ C Y S M C- .. N✓ O..e�� _ - 9 ,O � � D e � a � 9 r _ 26 °ados To> � -ocga cLN c c_ ica R V - s o S f✓dJCr u } O O S L t C_ am O d 4 O G J V c S ➢ E CyF C C a 'O�PZ 4 �_ C 4 V p^ N C c G d � u ` cLi N CO- O NEN n'A n �u�A a'O Cy VO._7 M O� rS 9 4CV � rV CJ E00 "_ 00 r O. OSGtrV t >P O- NUNC �0�� C CGCT. Vv VCOJ _O ._PTa 09 lF `C VNaj <d L 9 C G✓ �� - C U �� a _ _ ^ v `or- a L cL P��j --,.� oa =c - uicvy ec QCY.9a n� 22 =G nor r cn. 4o aY`.� = �• -- O_rd�A9E� aa .r _� 4 S O ` O T✓ O u V� � Tp � S N y 0 V' N, YU V r rN '_ V ���C OPUTSr� f�j•' rI O^]Qq dS C C 6C•_CMdY rVC�gr G`V l E—Z %� TJ •e L JL Pnu rV 69LfC ✓�JCa�9 �r O'_Nr Nq r • C C Ls li _ a -J l L u.^ C1 N 6 J S� - N O 4v _ u C C' �a ^ M t° pC _ _ <Er6 �L 60L 06 S�Y��4NG�� SI y1 r N I.1 Ja aD h 16 P i 4 4' u u L •�• c k r _ c 0 c n Lnc c `�� -� oco cni+yN c �✓.,= �'° ro v 9 4 m ¢ u ✓ •Q• — L — u C V c t V 2p aV Ni .+x9 �� It � C u ��r OWa ut• C du � 9P q¢V y r G N v r Q r U •e L -� a L W 2 L T L 9 d O V � 4 — a L _T` till � CY O C y�/yyI 3L °.ea -_ eo c.eee �CQ b V J oil J q _ N V O _ L .L•J u �.n_.J_ ✓G -_ N -� :_ Po d— �cc %�� ny✓` ca. n'c ^�� : _ _ O •n l Y CT �` 'OE uuV ✓C� L =CN -Na�� 9d O iC VCV Nn L OV - > ✓_ "'c ^O i% N U� 6 q� Na> > ` N .a' n`= ° ° i 'A m 34 LP T _.. ..` a aN _ —n _Gd i o Gn eIN V `nZ GON V � O^ L ' =q �� -jT' i Cii and O4 v. � L ,n6 u. Vi^ N✓�d _ dva. .e aP C •� � �o Q�aq _ CO —u VN EN E� ��O CF-JVC r C�-dx _VW q u o\.cV L � 'C � N O N Nty r 9 ✓� TC 9` 9 V N N d_ Y C_ C TO✓ TO �� p� r ¢ N N __ V`_ OnJ _G f OI _ Oo N_ 6Nr G= 6N SNVd GV tea.°• �Na NN9 Zwr G^ 9C l� ��L•¢v- GLD L]v -I > Gn ul uE2 Gd -U ^•q r4 Dr ¢ Q-vZ ^ nl cVY CI `�1 4N b I �11 •�� I /l I dl UI••�� � 'I M u V.e Lnc c `�� -� oco cni+yN c �✓.,= �'° ro v 9 4 m ¢ u ✓ •Q• — L — u C V c t V 2p aV Ni .+x9 �� It � C u ��r OWa ut• C du � 9P q¢V y r G N v r Q r U •e L -� a L W 2 L T L 9 d O V � 4 — a L _T` °.ea -_ eo c.eee feo+ -yn_n J J q _ N V O _ L .L•J u �.n_.J_ uvr ... N -� :_ Po d— �cc %�� ny✓` ca. n'c ^�� _ _ O •n l Y CT �` 'OE uuV ✓C� L =CN -Na�� 9d O O iC VCV Nn L OV ^O i% N U� 6 q� ` N .a' n`= u —J U —_ 'A .� — q q; LP T • y V V O^ ' -jT' Oc and ¢��.�_ ��C vNU Vi^ WE _ dva. .e aP C •� � �o Q�aq _ CO —u VN EN E� ��O CF-JVC `ud C�-dx _VW q u o\.cV L � 'C � N O N Nty r 9 ✓� 9` 9 V N N d_ Y C_ C __ r V S� ¢ N N N_ 6Nr G= 6N SNVd 69 =0i� GV tea.°• �Na NN9 Zwr G^ 9C l� Q-vZ u [A 13 N C M: liJ ti 3 T - P V O f`� Y V •.a O T - F c- n_ O _ - _ - -C Tr 6% Cr - _v •+ 1. 3�•J �'�> _ _ - o C.o hoc -__ _ •,. T _ = iN C•�_ ^- ACA yC '-+F �. _ �C 6I O 66 �-'ov T nV1 - •. ...•T _ _ ___ OAS -i •T �_o -' VIVOVf <SOP G. -[�Y -OJL IOV VO •a �i �< N✓� v �; 6r 40�V QLI �•° 6 A _ L V V U �• CO - G� rI .. T"^ o j � .V�` •-' u L m T° l V C •- O V V_ • N ' V c� ua E •� a ..^vo• _ V C'C 9 L �� d C C O •w L V N- O 7° Z N r� y Y• V - •L.n J C- C r g 'C 6 _ l '� ^V P L U p C'' O ` V C Q 6 O p'° _• C °�v �s .�_ ry ^N _u__._F".� m� NT3_ •°p .ten N7 GV rr� T Lq OV_ O'! _ NPN_ ANN G) Od NN4 P`r�V V �q ter'' LV�V LN u C vV° _ r� v9V C •_+ C � .2 - C O^Jr .YiLr V m'-' avg0 r i�V NCB e" ^mow 4' pEov .-� UV r __ A Omr rc>'� ICCt q c COr C� •�� Lv9•! O r YO •. =- •.r C' • lr •Li �J ♦ V C O� O C� r N� :l y - V 'J q q� V S ` r� ' � _ C: V V V U T•+ d _. � `^ C j •O L `I O ^v - C� � •) y r 3LWNn �' tiVUt pCpL�rN 6CVUU N 4VL uNV uVV �n tJ•�6i N) Ni N C� C 1 L1 rn m c� ^ m SP v a j 1! TN i =T nv I I` ol I oa � ^ rp 6600>G 6 rOT 6—. flN tONl6_ f!p 'J 2 I1 I I11 I �v 9'OS''ri 1 y I ^r1. m.Ja v� 30�'� ; >> >jPp o``Jy° •c fl S q 6•p N 6 ' O` j N 6�^ >• � - � _ �i n I � i I r O d _sir �_� rA •— � � r= .- O l .. - I S O O 9 ry .Oi• ..J �• O_r^ ❑_ jN � Cn I '� nr�n __ � _ N r •p F p � ti 7_ O � i N rn m c� ^ m SP v a j 1! TN i =T nv I I` I oa � ^ rp 6600>G 6 rOT 6—. flN tONl6_ f!p 'J 2 I1 I I11 I �v 9'OS''ri 1 y I ^r1. m.Ja v� 30�'� ; >> >jPp o``Jy° •c fl S q 6•p N 6 ' O` j N 6�^ O d _sir �_� rA •— � � ..J �• ... r�i Z7 S6, rn m c� ^ m SP v a Ni H, O J0 M, W j 1! TN i =T nv I I` I oa 'J 2 I1 I I11 I 1 1 y I Ni H, O J0 M, W 11 I 0 1 r tl: w. L -J G p L V� 0 6 •� P W ° r a = W O T p % r I v'- r q V` O C 2 yL• C C xz �� A A�� i T40 �.GrA � - -• .OiU G G �� V � P 1i V ri O y •r �. d L A v -� W p� J L "„• _ I r E V N a O N y � A 9 W v zZ _ I -s ^ V V - A U LN, � � I p G .� t CI N N L •'� z r i c" o - A r Io'� r; .�• V p L _ G z .N+ u v l = J �> V V C 6 n n •`- 1 R \ r t II( � T u w M 6 N A 7I L. •� V`U• � C� C J V W O L I -. � I •r d .- N V • ^ C L I n G l �i � �-W.• � In G_ `` I T`{ s W =� W W VT r I d_Od_ pOy IN�V LET= dO Gd `� Y r_'-' SI p � { r•rr 6GN 6 Y IN..•Y _ I Qr 6Y Qr �O O'J O => _ r O V - v N -- _- L A L � J = o V C 6' •p i V 1 v p O N - C GU UN- l� -Y. u -•n Zz QG G.J I>a I 2� FN1 L -J G p L V� 0 6 •� P W ° r a = W O T p % r I v'- r q V` O C 2 yL• C C xz �� A A�� i T40 �.GrA � - -• .OiU G G �� V � P 1i V ri O y •r �. d L A v -� W p� J L "„• _ I r E V N a O N y � A 9 W v zZ _ I -s ^ V V - A U LN, � � I p G .� t CI N N L •'� z r i c" o - A r Io'� r; .�• V p L _ G z .N+ u v l = J �> V V C 6 n n •`- 1 R \ r t II( � T u w M 6 N A 7I L. •� V`U• � C� C J V W O L I -. � I •r d .- N V • ^ C L I n G l �i � �-W.• � In G_ `` I T`{ s W =� W W VT r I d_Od_ pOy IN�V LET= dO Gd `� Y r_'-' SI p � { r•rr 6GN 6 Y IN..•Y _ I Qr 6Y Qr �O O'J RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCA ONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING THE TIME EXTENSION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 83 -02 WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension for the above- described project, pursuant to Section 17.02.100 of the Development Code; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above- described project. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: A. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a distressed market climate for residential projects. B. That current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable to develop the project at this time. C. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be consistent with ® the intent of the Development Code. D. That the granting of said time extension will not be dei-imental to the public health, safety, or :welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: time exteision for: Project The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commissicn hereby grants a App li can t Fxniration DR 83 -02 BARMAKIAN OCTOBER 10, 1985 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF OCTOBER., 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary 0 -Oa Resolution 32 -053 Page 2 I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the -Foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopte4 by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of October. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 10 -a� L% 11 11 E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM Date: October 2, 1984 To: Planning Commas Lon i From: Dick May Park Project Coordinator 19% Subject: CONCURRENCE WITH THE CONCF_PIjAL PLAN FOR CUCAMONGA CREEKSIDE PARK CONSENT CALENDAR. BACKGROUND: Cucamonga Creekside Park is a three acre parksite, located immediately south of the intersection of Baseline Road and Alta Cuesta Drive, adjacent to the Cucamonga Creek. The park is planned as the southerly terminus to the first phase of the Cucamonga Creek Trail and Park project being developed through joint financial participation by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The park development will include parking to accommodate vehicles with horse trailers and passenger vehicles, a restroom, picnic facilities, 2 shade shelters (includin" one for horses), extensive landscaping and slope plantings, and bicycle and equestrian trail acce -s to the Cucamonga Creek Trail Project. The proposed plan has been reviewed and concurred in by the Park Development Commission and the Design Review Committee with the recommendation for submittal for review and concurrence by the Planning Commission, the plan will be submirted to the City Council for final approval. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Planning Commission review and concur in the proposed development plan for Cucamonga Creekside Park attachment ITFM NEMEC - LLF. cri �e LLI U.1 z 0 G M yy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LU a In I El P.T r7- LLI NOVA %I tk SEEMS !y N nm_ 4K %J tr, nm_ FDate- Ll 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOINGA MEMORANDUM October 2, 1984 To: Planning Commission Frem: Dick Ma , rk Project Coortinator Subject: CONCURRENCE WITT! BEA'STIFICATION PROJECT CONCEPT PLANS CARNELIAN STREET AND BASELINE ROAD CONSENT CALENDAR BACKGROUND: Ir_ 1981, the Carnelian Street Beautification project was started which improved the street rights of way, from Foothill Boulevard to just below Baseline Road, with a varied palette of plant materials designed to beautify and provide color and scale to the area_ Subsequently the City Council has approved budgetary funding for other beautification projects within the City, including more work on Carnelian Street and the improvement of the westerly entry into the City along Baseline Road. The proposed Carnelian Street beautification improvements will improve both sides of the street rights of way from Banyan Street to 19th Street, a distance of approximately one (1) mile. The plant palette chosen for the project was similar to the existing Carnelian Street beautification, but also provides for the inclusion of some existing plant materials in the proposed area of development. This area was selected as a 'pilot' program with the full intention of. continuing the Carnelian Street right of way beautification south from 19th Street to Baseline Road once some right of way prob =ems in this area are resolved. The Baseline Road entry development beautification work will also include both sides of the street rights of way from the westerly City boundary to Carnelian Street, providing for extensive landscaping improvements on the south side of the street from the City limits to Alta Cuesta Drive and the tree plantings and ground cover planting from there to Carnelian Street. Again, the plant palette will be similar to that used for the existing Carnelian Street project, but will also provide for blending with existing plant material uses near the Upland /Rancho Cucamonga City limits and in the area where the Cucamonga Creek erosion control planting work has been accomplished. Both projects have been concurred in by the Design Review Committee and with the concurrence of the Planning Commission, will be submitted to the City Council for approval and direction to begin working drawings. RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission review and concur in the conceptual beautification plans for the Carnelian Street and Baseline Road Beautification Projects. ITEM F E E 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 10, 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning CoT.rnission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dino Putrino, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT R0. 84 -21 - ALTA LOMA CHRISTIAN CHURCH - A request to convert an existing 1,868 square foot single family residence to an office for the Alta Loma Christian Church on .25 acres of land in the Very Low Residential district, located at the west side cf Sapphire, across from Orange - APN 1062- 332 -23. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Convert single family residence into church office. B. Purpose: Provide administrative office facilities for Alta Loma Christian Church. C. Location: 6390 Sapphire D. Parcel Size: .25 acres (10,89u ft.) E. Existing Zoning: Very Low Residential F. Existing Land Use: Single Family Residential G. Surrounding Lard Use and Zoninq: North - Institutional (church T, Very Low Residential South - Single Family Residential, Low Residential East - Single Family Residential, Low Residential West - Institutional (church), Very Low Residential H. General Plan Desionations: roject Site - Low Residential, 2 -4 du /ac North - Low Residential, (2 -4 du /ac) South - Low Residential, (2 -4 du /ac) East - Low Residential, (2 -4 du /ac) West - Low Residential, (2 -4 du /ac) I. Site Characteristics: The subject property is a rectangular shaped ot. This property is basically surrounded by the adjacent church property. ITEM G PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 84 -21 - Alta Loma Christian. Chcrch October 10, 1984 Page 2 3. Alicable Regulations: The Development Code permits church office facilities within the Very Low Residential district subject to a Conditional Use Permit. In addition, no structure originally designed as a residence shall be used for an office use unless the building and site are improved meet all code requirements for an office development. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The proposed project creates two issues which need to be addressed: (1) The need to master plan the new addition into the original development plan consistent with the proposed uses, and (2) the land use compatibility of office use as it relates to the surrounding existing single family residential uses. Both of these issues should be d. cussed re-ative to the Planning Commission consideration of the Conditional Use Permit approval. The building and site plan do net meet the code requirements for an office development. Also, the need for a Master Plan between the subject property and the church property is essential. 'Unfortunately, this information was discovered after this item had been advertised and noticed. The applicant has been informed of the required plan changes and requests a continuation of the subject application in order to develop a Master Plan for the project. III. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Oaily Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices were sent to property owners withir. 300 feet of the project site. - To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue Conditional Use Permit No. 84 -21 to the November 14, 1984 P1arnirg Commission Meeting to give the applicant ample time to revise plans and address the Master Plan issue. Respectfully submitted, Rick Gomez City Planner RG: DP: ns Attachments: Letter from Applicant Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan G -a U E 0 11 11 ALTA LOMA CHRISTIAN CHURCH DAVID I- McCLARY MINISTER Julv 31, 1984 9774 19TH STREET ALTA LOMA, CALIFORNIA 91701 (7141989 -6935 Subject: Proposed use of residence at 6390 Sapphire. To Whom It May Concern, It is proposed to utilize the residence at 6390 Sapphire for church offices, administrative activities, counseling, conference and meeting rooms. The offices would be used daily from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. and the staff would range from two to six persons. Occasional meetings of committees would be held in the evening from 7:00 p.m. until 9:00 p.m., and the facilities would be used for meeting on Sunday from 9:00 a.m. until 12:00 p.m. and from 6:00 p.m. until 9:00 p.m. Since the primary church facilities and the church parking lot are to the north and west of the resident property proposed to be used for offices, it is also proposed that .a gate be placed near the back of the residence in the north wall separating the residence and he church parking lot. The rear entrance to the residence would then become the primary entrance /exit -to the facility. The front entrance to the residence would then primarily be used by the staff that would park in the driveway. DLLM /mz ,Respectfully, David L. McClary Minister lo G --3 A nondenominctionol fellowship where only the Bible is tc✓ght. f w r Iri,ri IZ 1 / .. II�.fMY'1` Z T T 1 I} * ✓ b 9 ./ - �] _ r • ,. 0 i� ° Cj'yl 1 ,;-- 1 O l �S p d ZZ+i L � fi 1 •1 \ ^V' , a CITY O PLANNI \G DIVISION �r V F c L-4, L, Cu@w d.l C. Uri ! iyn 2v 3„!z, ,.! GAi aw' 2.,' all, ay� 1 7 a V u r \ :Y _uu f n 9 b rn:m= 4 �Cup f34 -a.1 TITI.I:: —LO CcLTio�-A�p SC\l.E: 6 -51 G� INORTI-1 Y w 11' Mf1 L ..ww� SITE PLAIT rn:m= 4 �Cup f34 -a.1 TITI.I:: —LO CcLTio�-A�p SC\l.E: 6 -51 G� INORTI-1 Y w 11' Mf1 11 n i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVLgO.N w w r d Vl S a a Q i s a A v'I � n S l L r5 .1 v r C S i.l c 0 �I ITEM: „N,� CUP 04- zI TITLE: 1Te tPL.t i EXHIBIT. �_ SCALE- V G -s 11 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 10, 1984 19" TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dino Putrino, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND NON- CONSTP.UCTION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -26 - STORALL - A request to convert 754 square feet of an approved building into a caretaker's office and residence for a self- service storage facility on 3.51 acres of land in the General Industrial (Subarea 3) District, located at 9605 9th Street, west of Archibald - APN 209 -031 -043. I. PRO•IFCT ^ND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Convert storage building area into a caretaker's office and residence. B. Purpose: Provide 24 -hour property security. C. Location: 9605 9th Street. D. Parcel Size: 3.51 acres (152,900 sq. ft.). E. Existing Zoninq: Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 3, General Industrial). F. Existing Lard Use: Vacant. G. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: Industrial Specific Plan North - Manufacturing, Industrial Specific Plan South - Manufacturing, Industrial Specific Plan East - Vacant, Industrial Specific Plan West - Manufacturing, Industrial Specific Plan. H. General Plan Desi Project Site - Ge North - General South - General East - General West - General Inations• neral Industrial Industrial Industrial Industrial Industrial ITEM H PLANNING COMMISSION CUP 84 -26 - Storall October 10, 1984 Page 2 STAFF REPORT I. Site Characteristics: The subject property has a recently approved site plan consisting of 13 storage facility buildings. J, Applicable Regulations: The Industrial Specific Plan permits a caretaker's residence within a General Industrial District subject to a Conditional Use Per -mit. Ii. ANALYSIS: A. General: The proposed caretaker's position wojld be a live -in manager responsible for `he property security on a 24 -hour basis. The proposed request meets the minimum /maximum standards of the Development Code. Due to some revisions of the site plan, the proposed caretaker's unit is visible from the entrance and thus should be provided greater architectural treatment. The caretaker's unit and the surrounding area should provide for additional architectural and landscaping treatment due to the nature of the proposed use and its location. Er1v iro:1���ei1tal Assessment.: The Planning Commission issued a Negative Declaration, for the development of this industrial park on April 9, 1980. No further environmental review is required. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the Industrial Area Specific Plan and General Plan. The proposed use, building -. design, and site plan, together with the recommended conditions of approval, is in compliance with all applicable City standards and ordinances. In addition, the project will not be detrimental to the adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environmental impacts. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Daily Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. 14i - Q L! J Pq C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 84 -25 - Storall October 10, 1984 Page 3 LJ V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use- Permit No. 84 -25 through adoption of the attached Resolution with conditions. cttulVsubmitted, �it3f Planne i RG:DP:ns Attachments 11 Letter from Applicant Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Elevations Initial Study, Part I Resolution of Approvitl 11-3 l August 28, 11084 Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Eancho Cucamonga, California 91730 RE: Rancho Cucamonga Mini- Storage DR 84 -11 Conditional Use Permit (Non - Construction) Gentlemen, With this letter we are submitting our application for a Conditional Use permit for our project. The Conditional Use application is a result of our desire to include a caretaker living quarters on the premises. After considerable research, we have concluded that a self- service storage facility functions much more efficiently ; °ith a live -in manager. In addition to filing records, collecting rent Sad completing repairs, the manager is also responsible for security checks throughout the facility. Combining the office with an apartment for the resident manager fills several needs at once. Residing on the premises, the manager is available to handle emergencies 24 hours a day, and is also able to make security checks period- ically. The apartment size need not exceed 800 square feet. A iwo bedroom apartment, with dishwasher, disposal, range, oven washer and dryer, plus a living /eating area will suffice. The apartment can be located at the office area, adjacent to the entrance to the facility. See attached floor plan. The facility hours will not be changed, however, the resident manager will remain on the premises at all "times. Additionally, the number of employees will be unchanged. Should you have any questions regarding this application, please call me at your earliest convenienc -. /7 Enclosures DGMJksm cerely e aniel G: Macbeth STOR -ALL (714) 675 -8286 /-/- y 0 I El O le /l O • 00 .c C a= . ao Sc i J OJC � v m 1 h r 0— JJ 1 — y' �•� 6� Peas i. i -jam' t1Y..GY Paa3' ror 10 siaic " o • oa G p Po�i T I h uaac SpL.0 �S1JC V/\ _{ SK Vq � ; Po[ S „c G I i 111f 1T T _, y' �•� 6� Peas i. ' -jam' Gl Paa3' ror 10 siaic r ,(D 'r5 • G p Po�i T I h uaac yu.C. � � 1 Por.2 PP.at.2 ; Po[ S „c G I i Py ID (J Peas • 1 Gl Paa3' ror 10 siaic c h uaac fer 6 a© i• 11^ M 2 a� n: ISSSL E. 1 far 4 £t. , plA ti !K 1 I t ~ •l • lr�-./ =r u +L -J — �K V. \ ear c hr.3 � \ •. \ J.ari` Lt 4\\ \ ._ ' 4 Q Port • l�j �— 1 WT I Pa 9 I Po.1 Zpl 7" ror 10 siaic c ro 'SI1. Psf ,9 /t5 -I6 t7 L :Y.♦,r��z ua 4320.P1♦ -11 /bl a? :'r•w lo a . P ;366. Pm 40V / 226.5. 20/ 1328. R m 1415 Q 6 -- i76 i - . A4- _dSSOr•S Map , NJts- AUessor -s B0. t3 Lot Book 209 Pago 03 rv•.mryrs sl. ,n " Cucws San Bornurd,na County "O-AN9h6, CITY OF ITE�1:,3C °` CUP 84 -ZCp RA. \•C: U CUCATMONGA -d-rn-E: LcC_A -«_.,t MAP PLANNING D.VEION EXH1Bi r. A_ \� t SCALD RANCHO CUCAMONGA MINI STORAGE CiST Of RMR:p CO M" • [AVITt C/ L RCRMIMy . 1T'T[ 01 Cy,f00M1\ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 8653 15 001 m I PAM El M oe - IWR'I'I -i CITY OF nmxl :u� RANCHO CLTCX.N210ti'GA -n: PL kN-T R \G DIVISION EXHIBIT- Lam_ SCALE: - h- E sr st^ntial chance in around =ea`^ a svbs•- <...__al char exist_ng cr _ r ' _ is the P�:isai^ — -- ^_ea__ c�r_noe� ...- e _ _.c zen_ne or X -P ^O`: e any e! . -is __ng trees? HOW _many? —_ �- ^,a° aeec. for use or d'_saosai of manteria =s scch as `T_Taz.` z'_l -es or evn_csives? Inv - vt•�_- ••� _r a:.e T- -�.:._ _ _ -_ T�^ i�'.P construction - ves __ O f CIEFLIFICATICI: _ ?:ereLv re.r__r\- that the stateT.<_n. s '' r shed a�C:" a �d i_^ ^'1e A- =ached ex _)4-ts - ress . t t_-he cata and ^i_s ini a_ a_ evaluation best ^__ _ -:� v. ._a_ -_he =acts, statements, and mat, On ?SP7":�C ..�Cl _ _ -° .-.r,Q CO`r °Ct �'^ }.:° ��'s t of my . - =- --• -- .- _ . -_. °- tL ^.ders-,*sd _`zit addit: ^a'_ _ ^__ •�s a^t_- P_oreoan -- -ce1.P c a- _ =n can _ `, w ^ P ie° r an T =t=, 'or: Owner A \' acre Darcel into _ _ _ — _ _ OJO +i Pry ..rr;De rLl/ 1 _�+. , yfa .gyp` C -:)� t•J " �+ _ _ '- - ew ADD^• -,ve t crage - ,-- ^ =1 =, -- - _ =_V ��_�Q�V_-' a� �^ _�r '_1� T='T D50.T. �f•'^ PT+e.`. 1. 1a -_.; .1 ...n_.- - JY D ���•_��;�_-, :�cy cLZ.:. *z�. - mow' = -- T..a, -.s <,'^��ss�. OR SCENIC -:--CTS, 0" ANY ^p -``^ ^ter`; Of er rti`„1 Lie -- - -= - - - - - - _ _ _ - --_cam - �.>z _� :cc• ;,:: _� - ;.n part _ - a. :.._ --r ^— one C . c c- a = = ° -S '- 7 ^n %,n CC=leted L-'•V dD"'_ic—ant - _..--- •••a- •= ?= a_-n�57 _..L �'c.F_ ?'r _'C� °_. Jai. DC-_ -_ this cam•- •n.__q�. _. �., _.__ ^t __ ^^ ? - =_ s_-:.- a��S15 >_c.__ �._ D- eD.are e -make =e CF three '•h=' 7TM' °rte will have no s =CI]_- -'Cc:� n....- - a -• -_._ _ -.er♦ e. Neaat__{ ve Declaration C. }nt t °,_ ,.BCP_ 1 s:C :_°_C3 ^._ an 0 - -..1 _.o.. renort .L= _._. ._ � r ?y =, .L.•. _ ��r _�.J = -�C�� a ^:e_ G. `?acSeth I$'*OHALT \ nnl V" rn, r nn.+ ^i.. .11;tl= _ _.,'_.. TO BE CONTACTED •nr._. -._ ... `., ,,fin r`,< • --- - _ __r _ . ?252 5 ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) -S TT = - `-- --. „_ .: ^-v T OC7,1, STATE AND RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA P! :,%r0ING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 84 -26 FOR THE CONVERSION OF 754 SQUARE FEET OF AN APPROvtU STORAGE FACILITY BUILDING INTO A CARETAKER U"JIT LOCATED AT 9605 9TH STREET IN THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 28th day of August, 1984, a complete application was filed by Storall for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 10th day of October, 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above- described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 2. That the proposes use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. SECTION 2: That Conditional Use Permit No. 84 -26 is approved subject to the following conditions: i. Approval of the Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to prior approval of the architectural and landscape plans by the Design Review Committee. 2. Floor plans of the building shall be submitted to the Fire District for review prior to occupancy. 3. The applicant shall contact the Building and Safety Division and Engineering Division regarding the submittal of appropriate plans and obtaining necessary permits prior to operation of use. 4. All Conditions of Approval shall be completed prior to occupancy. // -/D Resolution No. Page 2 S. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if approved use has not commenced within twenty -four_ (24), months-from the date of approval, per Conditions of Approval. 6. This approval shall run with the applicant /landowner and shall become void upon a change of business /land ownership or if the operation ceases. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1984. PLANNING COaMMISSIO: OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick. Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of October, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: // 11 E I] 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 10, 1984 1977 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krali, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8753 - ROCHESTER FREEWAY NORTH LTD. - A division of 9 acres into 2 parcels in the General Industrial Development District (Subarea 13) located north of 6th Street, east of Old Rochester Avenue - APN 229 -261 -9239 I. PRO,'ECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of Parcel Map. B. Purpose: To divide 9 acres of land into 2 parcels within the General Industrial Development District (Subarea 13). C. Location: North of 6th Street, west of Old Rochester Avenue. D. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 - 6.5 acres Parcel 2 - 2.5 acres E. Existing Zoning: General Industrial Development (Subarea 13). F.- Existing Land Use: Vacant. G. Surrotndinq Land Use: North - vacant South - vacant East - vacant, I -15 Freeway West - existing industrial building. H. Surrounding General Plan and Development Code Designations: North - General Industrial Subarea 13 -- South - General Industrial (Subarea 13) East - General Industrial (Subarea 13) West - General Industrial (Subarea 13). I. Site Characteristics: The site consists of existing grape vineyards and s opes approximately 1.5% from north to south. ITEM I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Environmental Assessment and Parcel Map 8763 - Rochester October 10, 1984 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: The owner of the site is requesting a division of 9 acres into 2 parcels in the General Industrial District (Subarea 13). The proposed parcels were physically separated by the realignment of Rochester Avenue. Rochester Avenue will be widened at the time of development of the parcels. A portion of Parcel 2 as shown on the attached map, will be offered for dedication for the future I -15 Freeway REnp at 7th Street. This alignment is based on the D.K.S. Preliminary Interchange Study.. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Also attached for your review and consideration is Part I of the initial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Upon completion and review of the Initial Study and field investigation, Staff found no adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the proposed subdivision. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution conditionally approving Tentative Parcel Map 8763 and authorizing the issuance of a Negative Declaration. Respectfully LBH:B 'jaa Attachments: sub mitt d, Map - Tentative Resolution City Engineer's Initial Study & Vicinity Report LJ C'J C El Ell I TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N4. 8763 IN fl'F C /✓ 4F .t /.✓Cw•O l�nlwi�aW. llYS✓lY N .L.a(/ efsY- 4fe'o%H� .fTAIL d C /lii /aMdN. ' " Ptif Avfco.COlC /H O/A"! /�i/iif O,!!:l dG .KILN /OJ' /F ✓s-0 ew%✓rr . ./.^•IA/J I zz" JcrGY AC, /f // efsc w /Iron eao anurrl :: awes vr.: ca�iowar.�' wu is E[ Aov —.r a eaipew" XAOr" /C :.tilfWWW MC 02WAV w y A w n A rya�M: -rRU POaiTAN h/Arrn O.snzscr rn S/Ycdl /+r.• per_ -p roc- 8 /log. P3q O./2 -- -- — — _Land!' -- � -- ti i� •� <'• foots _ •ol / • A.i LL iqp,+ G.SAG. II Irls�tft N' /. a kK h O 3 �or �.es'Fry I /Sve- � ?• t ivs i a I y • t r e la I .w m LU CD w � r � m � CITY OF RANCHO CCJCA,\ IO\NGA ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY NIAr_ title; P.M. 8163 page Ll c- CITY OF RAvC110 CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Co— maittee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Studv. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Ccz=,ittee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant en- ironmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- 1 tion concerning the proposed project. 0 PROJECT TITLE: Parcel Map No 8763 APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Rerhe<ter Froawav North Tta -- 71642 E. rMICIPn Aln(1 Diamcnd Bar, Calif. 91765 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: E1 Monte, Calif. 91734 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL. NO.) Roc' cte between Oraagp and BLffalo north Of 6rh qt -n-.• A c<occnr' c N +tuber 229 -261 9 & '19 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: _ I -1 E.1- PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: To divide one parcel of land in= two parcels by Parcel Na, ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPJSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: Project area - 9 Acres - no Proposed buildings. DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): flat. 1 -15 is adjacent rn tno oaer- a now rnmmorri�l rl e.,e lr..mu..e Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? No 0 1-2 WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO X 1. Create a substantial charge in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? X 3. Czeate a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as te;:ic substances, flammables or explosives? ® Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required fo-- this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development P.eview Committee. a Dana a ve q Signature a f IF Title I -3 �— W RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG.A, CALIFORNIA,, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER PMB763 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 3763) LOCATED NORTH OF 6TH STREET, WEST OF OLD ROCHESTER AVENUE WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 0.763, submitted by Rochester Freeway North Ltd. and consisting cf 2 parcels, located north of 6th Street, west of Did Rochester Avenue being a division of Lot 35, Map of Rochester, as per plat recorded in Book 9 of Maps, Page 20, Records of said County; and WHEREAS, on September 5, 1984, a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above- described Tentative Map; and WHEREAS, on October 10, 1984, the Planning Coanission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above - described map. F0, AL OWS: NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS SECTION 1: That tie following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental draiage, public health problems or have adverse affec.s on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse environmentalir acts and a Negative Declaration is issued on October 10, 1984. J - SECTION s: Tnat Tentative Parcel Map No. 8763 is approved subject to the reco-7mended Conditions of Approval pertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED TuI`_' 10TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAP;ONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy -Secretary ? Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of ':_echo Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of October, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ASSENT: C01"114ISSIONERS: 11 E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL LOCATION: North of 6th Street west of Old TENTATIVE PARCEL F81P NO: 8763 Rochester Avenue DATE FILED: 9/5/84 LEGAL DESCRIPTION:beinq a subdivisicn cf NUMBER OF LOTS: 2 Lot 35, Map of Rochester as per plat GROSS ACREAGE: 9 recorded in Rook 9 of Maps oaie 20, ASSESSOR PARCEL NO: 229 -261 -9 & 39 Records of said County DEVELOPER Rochester Freeway North 22632 E. Goldn Soros #300 Diamond Bar, CA 91765 OWNER Same ENGINEER /SURVEYOR Adams & Ells 3236 N. Peck Road E1 Monte, CA 91734 Improvement and dedication requirements in accordance with Title 16 of the Municipal Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga include, but may not be limited to, the following: Dedications and Vehicular Access 1. Dedications shall be made of all interior street rights -of -way and all ne,,ssary easements as shown on the tentative :nap. X - 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the following streets: 40 additional feet on Rochester Avenue additional feet on additional feet on 3. Corner property line radius will be required per City Standards. 4. All rights of vet1 cular ingress and egress shall be dedicated as follows: 5. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all conanon roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by C.C. &R.s and shall be recorded concurrent with the map. -1- --]a 6. All existing easements lying within future right -of -way are to be quite -,imed or delineated on the map per City Engineer's requirements. 7. Easements for sidewalk for public use shall * -e dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. Surety Y. 1. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements prior to building permit issuance for individual parcel. 2. A lien agreement must be executed prior to recording of the map for the following: 3. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed, guaranteeing completion, of all on -site drainage facilites necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Divison prior to recording for and /or prior to issuance of building permit for _ Street improvements Pursuant to the City of Ranch Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title 16, Section 16.36.126, the subdivider may enter into an agreement and post security with the City guaranteeing the required construction prior to recordation of the map and /or building permit issuance. 1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. 2. A minimum of 26 -foot wide pave:* °.%t within a 40 -foot wide dedicated right -of -way shall be constructed for all half - section streets. X 3. Construct the following missing improvements: Prior to building permit issuance for individual parcels. Curb & A.C. Side- Drive Street Street A.C. Median Street Name Gutter Pvmt. Walk Appr. Trees Lights Overlay Island* Other Rochester X X X X X X *Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter 9 -2- :T_ 1 I X 4. Prior to any work being performed in the public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. X 5. Street improvement plans shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. 6. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. 7. Existing lines of 12KV or less fronting the property shall be undergrounded. X S. Install appropriate street name signs, traffic control signs, striping and markings with locations and types approved by the City Engineer. X. 9. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Lights shall be on decorative poles with underground service. ® X 10. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permit. 11. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross side.ialks. Undersidewaik drains shall be installed to City Standards. E Drainage and Flood Control 1. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated or noticed on the final :yap. 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property fr= adjacent areas. 3. The following storm drain shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 4. Prior to recordation of the map, a hydrologic and drainage study for the project shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review. 5. A drainage detention basin per City Standards si,all be constructed to detain increased runoff Grading X i. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with -the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading plan. X _ 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work prior to issuance of building permit. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist a-ti submitted at the time of application or grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan hall b-! subject to review and approval by the Grading Committee and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit whichever comes first. X 5. Final grading plans fer each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of building permit. General Requirements and Approvals X 1. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: CalTrans for X San Bernardino County Flood Control District X Cucamonga County Water District for sewer and water San Bernardino County Dust Abatement (required prior to issuance of a grading permit) Other 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (C.C. &R.$) approved by the City Attorney is required prior to recordation of the map. X 3. Provide all utility services to each lot including sewerage. water, electric power, gas and telephone prior to street constructon. X 4. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. 5. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CalTrans /San Bernardino County Flood Control District. X_ 6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. -4- � I � X 7. The filino of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County W_.. - District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. 8. Local and j4dster Planned Trails shall be provided in accordance with the Trail Plan. A aetailet trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing and weed control, in accordance with City trail standards, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to recordation for and /or prior to building permit issuance for 9. Prior to recording, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under assessment District 82 -1 among the newly created parcels. X 10. At the time of final map submittal, the following shall be submitted: Title Report, traverse calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and /or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. X 11. An offer of dedication for the future I- 1517th Street Freeway ® off -ramp on Parcel 2 shall be provided and shall be so shown on the Final ;lap. X 12. The relationship of Parcel 2 to ouffalo Avenue shall be clearly shown on the Final Map. -5- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LLOYD B. HUBBS, CITY ENGINEER by: 0 U 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA -MONGA STAFF REPORT • 4� DATE: October 10, 1984 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd E. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8800 - DEBERARD - A division of 7.78 acres into 6 parcels in the General Industrial /Rail Served Development District (Subarea 5) located at the northwest corner of Center Avenue and 66th Street - APN 209 - 261 -07 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of parcel map. B. Purpose: To divide 7.78 acres of land into o' parcels in the General Industrial /Rail Served Development District (Subarea 5). C. Location: :northwest corner of 6th Street and Center Avenue. D. Parcel Size: Parcel I - 1.11 acres Parcel 4 - 1.17 acres Parcel 2 - 1.20 acres Parcel 5 - 1.31 acres Parcel 3 - 1.12 acres Parcel 6 - 1.33 acres E: Existinq Zoning_: General District Subarea 5). Industrial /Rail Served Development F. Existinq Land Use: Vacant. G. Surrounding Land Use: North - existing industrial building South - vacant East - existing industrial building West - flood control ctannel and vacant land. H- 11 Cj icnations: tiorzn - General Industrial tSubarea 5) South - Industrial Paris Development District (Subarea 6) East - General Industrial (Subarea 5) West - General Industrial (Subarea 5). ITEM J Lnni,lrn ;,UPIm1J�)l Urj 51AFF REPORT Environmental Assessment and Parcel Map 8800 - DeBerard October 10, 1984 Page 2 I. Site Cisaracteristics: The site slopes at approximately 2% from north to south and is vacant except for unattended grape vineyards. II. A14ALYSIS: The developer is requesting a division of 7.78 acres of land into —6 parcels in the General Industrial /Rail Served Development District for the development of an industrial complex approved by Planning Commission on August 22, 1984 as Development Review 84 -32. All parcels are over an acres and conform to the Industrial Specific Plan, Subarea S. The grading plan has been conceptually approved and final grading plans will be submitted at the time of building permit issuance. IIJ. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Also attached for your review and consideration is Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has conpleted Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. upon completion and review of the Initial Study and field investigation, Staff found no adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the proposed subdivision. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission ad-')t the attached resolution conditionally approving Tentative Parcel Map 8800 and authorizing the issuance of a Negative Declaration. Respectfully submitted, i LBH: R'kf jaa Attachments: Map - Tentative & Vicinity Rusoiution City Engineer's Report Initial Study L J --0- Ell A yyad • Fofc od3 5� �qrm� lz L) fz� tj lz tj V 'eaximn iouw= uoov ammo ceeeeuvr,33e ens - ' —� j = 3�0� .11 � -Fr o- 3—� CITY Y 01- ITEM 1= %�i_ cn � - R:1\CI -Ip CUC�""O\'GA TITLE ps F'4-45Z PLANNING DIVISION " f-, J -q NORTH .'J yi r t z. 3-5 r ME L L J IL _z f � I i I a I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I — PROJECT INFOR*11iTION SHEET — To be ca:�leted by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87..00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this fors must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the departme-.t where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part IT_ of the Initial Study. The Development Review Co =„ittee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will mate qne of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report 'sill be prepared, or 3) An additional information report shouted be supplied by the applicant g=ving f:ar.:her ir_forma- tion concerning the proposed project.- PROJECT TITLE: Rancho Center Industrial Park APPLI22-VT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TE' 9575 :,rchibald Ave., Ste. 101 Rancho :Andrew Barmakiar. 'NA"^,E, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSCN TO BE CONTACTED CONC= R! ;ING THIS PROJECT: Andrew Sarrakian (same as above LOC -A =CN OF PROJECT (STREET .ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) Northwest corner of Sixth Street and Center Avenue LIST OTHER PER "SITS NECESSARY ! RCVS LOCAL, �;EGIONA= , STATE AND FEDERiki, AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUI_:G SUCH PER' ITS: Giauin_a and building permit from the City of Rancho Cucamonga Department — o` Building and Saferv_ I -1 S"r E C C t PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The existing site is zone subarea S and tn^ vroposed parcei map onsits otb lots ranging from 1.11 acres to 1.35 acres for industrial buildire nroie_ts. - -- ACREAGE OF PROTECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE. OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: The rroieet sit!: S acres Th- fSl2F3P caA rnt'il hr,ildinn ;r a• sQu -ire feet DESCRIBE THE EN IRONMZNTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPI:Y, PLANTS (TREES1, ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICnL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SUR?OUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS) rCCLLIInCar In iUr :s - i� or more years oia: lne use or tRese aaiacent facilities are light industrial and manu °acturine Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cc:.M,:lative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental imtact? NO I -2 J-7 -i YiILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO. E Explanation of anv YES answers above: INOW I_*F?03Ty�T: 2f the project , - Ives the constr*_ction of residential u it - -omplete tie fc = on the next pace. 'A CERTI =:r CATION. _ hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for ti:is initial e�aluatio. to the best of my ability, and that the facts '_n °_o ^atioa s�atements, a-nd presented are true and ccrrect'tc tie best of my knowledge and belief. I Earthen u understand thzt additional f o^- 2.tion may be required to be sub =fitted be_ore ar, adecuate evaluation can be jj made by the Development Re : -te< e: .om_ tee. Date Signature / /% �v✓ a Title Vice - President Create a substantial change in around contours? X l- Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? Y 3. Create a substantial change iii =e=ared for municipal services (police, fire, water sewage, etc.)? , X 4. Crv-ate chances is the existin3 zcaino or general plan designations? X 5. Remove any existinc trees? Eow V =.-n. Y 6. Create the need for use or dispos'_l of potentially hazardous materials s.-ch as toxic substances, flam-sables oz e--plosives? E Explanation of anv YES answers above: INOW I_*F?03Ty�T: 2f the project , - Ives the constr*_ction of residential u it - -omplete tie fc = on the next pace. 'A CERTI =:r CATION. _ hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for ti:is initial e�aluatio. to the best of my ability, and that the facts '_n °_o ^atioa s�atements, a-nd presented are true and ccrrect'tc tie best of my knowledge and belief. I Earthen u understand thzt additional f o^- 2.tion may be required to be sub =fitted be_ore ar, adecuate evaluation can be jj made by the Development Re : -te< e: .om_ tee. Date Signature / /% �v✓ a Title Vice - President RESOLUTION NO. El A RESOLUTION OF THE PLAIN ING- COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCPd?ONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 8800 k'TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 8800) LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER Gr CENTER AVENUE AND 6TH STREET WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 8800, submitted by Charles DeBerard and consisting of 6 parcels, located atthe northwest corner of Center Avenue and 6th Street, being a divisiol of the East 600 feet of the South 651 feet of Lot "C" North Cucamonga Townsite per Map Book 13, Page 15, Records of Car Bernardino County, Californ'a; and WHEREAS, on August 29, 1984, a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above - described Tentative Map; and WHEREAS, on October 10, 1984, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above - described map. FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNIN- COMMISSION RESOLVES' AS SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physirlly suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvemenas will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECT ION 2: environmental impacts 1984. 11 That this project will, not create significant adverse and a Negative Deciaration is issued on October 10, SJb�et.� 00 is app (oveo 'kilo gg eti. _�� pac pe to r 0 Z�E'YS�� 19gn rt3t YoV31 pE �a � e o{ Pp4 10,t,`i OH OP�'�OyGP SSC\o0y c ro ' P OQ�sO �PyO�Q GU ,der P�`0 O o { PN�Z. �r.3�im Cori` SO�JtO r iss �ssiOr SeLYet3Y�t Q�arc 0 Y 9 gt = Oerris epJty tre tre ` the he Q� to - em ' Z ELK ° °��2 D eor2ta <��s� aaop�e bl,0ai °9 ote' cS � S ce 3rd 3c { o `�� V pe4Jt"ro_Yob Sea Yeo�;'� tre °met. 3, a °�� pas at gg4, b9 �� J at�`0aJL a�or9a t tco eY , 1 1, O �' i GJL OLtO Rar � aYl Rare aay °{ 0` +yRS-. YGi\ yt�e 10th GO,i�1SSI I hcAS = CO,A�ZSS 0 PASS CIS10yS�S CO,q;A1 GOES' FaSS�S E \�) -10 I L r r ,i SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Niap No. 8300 is approved subject to the recommended Conditions of Approval pertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Ceputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Connission of the Cicy of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of October, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 11 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL LOCATION: Northwest Corner of 6th Street TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO: 8 "000 and Center Avenue DATE FILED 8/29/84 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The east 600 feet of NUMBER OF LOTS: 6 the south 651 feet of Lot "Cu North GROSS ACREAGE: 7.78 Cucamonga Townsite per Map Book 13 Page i5 ASSESSOR PARCEL NO: 209 - 261 -07 Records or San Bernardino Co. California DEVELOPER OWNER ENGINEER /SURVEYOR Keller Construction Co. Charles DeBerard Andrew Sarmakian 99=0 E. Bald -,nn ?lace 44 Rollingwoad 9375 Archibald Ste 101 El Monte, Ca 91734 Roll :q His Est, CA 90274 Rncho Cucamonga CW1 91734 Improvement and dedication requirements in accordance with Title 36 of the Municipal Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga include, but may not be limited to, the following: Dedications and Vehicular Access X '• Dedications shall be made of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. X 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights- of -wey on the failoiwing streets: 14 additional feet on Gth Street additional feet on _addition;', feet on X 3. Corner property line radius gill be required per City Standards. 24' radius as shown an Tentative Map 4. All rights o7 veh9 =ular ingress and ecress shall be dedicated as follows: 5. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all common roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by C.C. &R.s and shall be recorded concurrent with the map. -1- X 6. All existing easements lying within future right -of -way are to be quitclaimed or delineated on the reap per City Engineer's requirements. X 7. Easements for sidewalk for public use shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. Surety X_ 1. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements prior to recording. 2. A lien agreement must be executed prior to recording of the map for the following: 3. Surety shall be posted and an aar -2ement ;, xeeuted, guaranteeing completion o�' all on -site drainage facili;es necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Divison prior to recording for and /or prior to issuance of building permit for Street Inaprovemerts Pursuant to the City of Ranch Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title 16, Section 16.36.120, the subdivider nay enter into an agreement and post security with the City guaranteeing the required construction prior to recordation of the map and /or building permit issuance. X 1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. 2. A minimum of 26 -foot wide pavement within a 40 -foot wide dedicated right -of -way shall be constructed for all half - section streets. X 3. Construct the following missing improvements: Prior to recordation. Curb & A.C. Side- Drive Street Street A.C. Median Street Name nutter Pvmt. Walk Appr. Trees Lights Overlay Island* Other Center X X X X X X 6th X X Meandering X X X `Includes landscaping and irrigation or, meter -2- � -aa C 11 X 4. Prior to any work being performed in the public rig't -of -way, X 2. fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. X `. Street improvement plans shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. 6. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of zny power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. X 7. Existing lines of 12KV or less fronting the property sha71 be undargrounded. X S. install appropriate street name signs, traffic control si -ns, striping and markings with locations and types approved by the City Engineer. X 9. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the _ Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. lights sfia17 be on decorative poles with underground service. X 10. Landscape and i!rioation plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permit. X 11. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewaiks. Undersidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards. Drainage and Flood Control F4 11 Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be r?qu`red and shall be delineated or noticed on the final ,rap. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance ant: disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent,- areas. 3. The following storm drain shall be installed to the satisfactiotir of the City Engineer: install existing storm drain lateral and install zatch basin on 6 *_h Street. 4. Prior to recordation of the map, a hydrologic and drainage study for the project shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review. 5. A drainage detention basin per City Standards shall be constructed to detain increased rur,off -3- ` _ �` !1:5 1. ^^ X 2. F4 11 Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be r?qu`red and shall be delineated or noticed on the final ,rap. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance ant: disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent,- areas. 3. The following storm drain shall be installed to the satisfactiotir of the City Engineer: install existing storm drain lateral and install zatch basin on 6 *_h Street. 4. Prior to recordation of the map, a hydrologic and drainage study for the project shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review. 5. A drainage detention basin per City Standards shall be constructed to detain increased rur,off -3- ` _ �` !1:5 Grading X 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grad ;ng plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading plan. X 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work prior to issuance of building permit. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application or .,r�Iding plan check. 4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Grading Committee and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit whichever comes first. X 5. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of building permit. General Aequirements and Approvals X 1. Permits from other agencies will be reo,0 red z; follow.-" CalTrans for San Bernardino County Flood Control District X Cucamonga County hater District for sewer and water X San Bernardino County Dust Abatement (required prior to issuance of a grading permit) Other 2. A copy of the Covenants, Condi*_iens and Restrictions (C.C. &R.$) approved by the City Attorney is required prior to recordation of the map. X 3. Provide all utility services to ed-h lot including sewerage, water, electric power, gas and telephone prior to streei: constructcn. X 4. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. _ 5. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CaiTrans /San Bernardino County Flood Control District. X 6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be Subject to any requirements that may be re ^eived from them. -4- f;.' ,3_iq C X 7. The filing of t "e tentative map or approval of same does not guara' tee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the.time building permits are requested. When building permits are requested, the Cur.-.,,,; County 'dater District will be asked to certify the ..vailability of capacity. Permits will nit be issued unless said certification is received in writing. 8. Local and toaster Planned Trails shall be provided in accordance with the Trail Plan. A detailed trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing and weea control, in accordance with City trail standards, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to recorjation fcr and /or prior to building permit issuance for 9. Prior to recording, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated ;lost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District 82 -I among the newly created parcels. 10. At the time of final map submittal, the following shall be submitted: Title Report, tra -eerse calculations (sheets), copies of recorded map; and deeds used as reference and /or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. CITY OF RAhaiO CUCAMONGA LLOYD B. HUBBS, CITY ENGINEER 0 by: -5- El E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STA FF REPORT 1984 19% 1 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dino Putrino, Assistant Planner SUB;ECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND NON - CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONAL U E P RMIT 4- 4- CHAPP E- A proposal to operate a ,0 0 square foot auto rentaT7- five, maintaining a maximum of 15 automobiles within an existing commercial plaza located on the soutn side of Foothill Boulevard, west of Archibald - APN 208 - 261 -52. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Operate an auto rental office. B. Purpose: Provide auto rental services. C. Location: 9619 Foothill Boulevard, D: Parcel Size_ Approximately 41,000 sq. ft. (2.08 acres). E. Existing Zonina: Genera, Commercial. F. Existing Land Use: General Commercial Shopping Center. G. Surroundin Land Use and Zonin . North - Service Commercial Bank, General Cananercial South - Single Family Residence, Low Residential East - Fast Food, General Commercial West - Bank, General Commercial H. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Commercfct North - Commercial South - Low Residential East - Commercial West - Commercial I. Site Characteristi,s: TFe subject property contains two detached multi - tenant '-1114; dings which together form an °L" configuration adjacent to the rear (south) and crest side property lines. The parking is located in the front of these buildi ^as adjacent to the streetscape. ITEM K PLANNING COMMISSION CUP 34 -24 - Chappie October 10, 1984 Page 2 STAFF REPORT J. Applicable Requlations: The Development Code permits an auto rental service within a General Commercial district subject to a Conditional Use Permit. 11. ANALYSIS: A. General: The operation of an auto rental facility raises two major issues which are: (1) sufficient parking, and (2) land use compatibility (conflicting with the Development Code, Section 17.10.010). The applicant is requesting to maintain a maximum of 15 automobiles at any one time within a neighborhood commercial center. Considering the worst case, 15 autos would be stored in the parking stalls of the existing parking area. The storage cf vehicles could not be adequately policed in order to control parking location. The proximity of parking stalls in re�ationship to the proposed use and surrounding uses could likely be used by the customers of the proposed auto rental office for drop off purposes. The possible accumu:ation of these vehicles in this area may cause poor parking conditions and potential conflicts with other customer parking needs; thus, the objectives of the General Plan, to avoid creating nuisances among adjacent land uses, could not be mct. Typically, uses of this type function best in a single use setting w,th a single user parking area. B. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study, as complete by the applicat!t, is attached for your review. Based upon completion of Part II of the Initial Studv, staff has found that no significant advr -se impacts wo "'occur as a result of this project. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The proposed , project is nat consistent with the objectives of the Development Code to "Promote and encourage commercial uses to be designed in centers that avoid creating nuisances among adjacent land uses. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Daily Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. � -a El n PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT CUP 84-24 - Chappie October 1 Page V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission den, Torlditional e Permit No. 84-24 through adoption of the attached r • ` r x Resolution- Respectfully e Rick Gomez City Planner RG:DP:ns Letter from . • 1 ! Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Initial Study, Part f Resolution of DEnial `. Development Co•_ , Section 17.10.010 1 71 �w •. i. y v 1 i � AUTO RENTAL 9619 Foothill Blvd Ranch Cucamonga, Cal 91730 Cicy of Rancho Cucamonga 9230 Baseline Rd Rancho Cucamonga, Cal 91730 Gentlemen; The proposed use of this store building is so:61_y 6or an office to rent out automobiles. The hours to be open would be from 7:30 AN until 6:30 PM. Number of employees would be a maxtum of two during the above hours. Automobiles being our only merchandise that we are providing or dealing with to be of service to the community. WS :,could need to park them in the parking lot and that is the reason for requesting a conditional use permit. The number of cars would vary from day to day with a maxiu;r� of fifre�.n, as agreed to by Western Commerical Development Company in the lease. The cars would be p --rked away from the building as not to incovience anyone. Sin�erly James F. Chappie JFi;I ajs JK ` q 11 I'= Rare Area 15049 >_ -'• p --- - -- - -- - -. J E. OOR. SECTION 10 _'.! I j._.. Ie1s10 BOULEVARD —�- ♦ _ __ POR. PAP 1 POR, PAR. 2 51 79 C +,, 14 ti ^tI t _ _ •�1, �`' ° �} i tea" h /�2) 5 i 54 n t4s O 1 Z ?t: ;. 0- P'R. ^1 — =i5• l'yt� / <o j /a. 046 iQ1O•,�:a.- `_/ _ �NECGQj i22 t h E f• - 512! 3� w CITY OF RANCHO CUCA12O \'G.A, PLANNING \G DdVOON -oL •. J Z U Q NORTH ITE;\ 1: w L'1 CUP [�i - 24 TITLE: LocA;vto -, MMp EXI- Imrr:--!A 4_ SALE= K/- .5 TTI I 0 v tU7 N I ' I aI4 A.16 L Se 3: I - -- - o , y SHOP 8ui a DING 'i o 1i l L; --' A-2 I' A-W a.G I F A "B A -10 G. TTI ?700 /SF B.R t _JL _... � \,. -�•- .v�-- - ii'��� DYNASTY Aerobics - 1 I � I I � � SHOP BUILOIt :G ?700 /SF L9 IIj I 1 DEE DEE'S II I DANCaJEAR and 1 !I L �f+ 1 _ I LI I I �.w I J L !( I� �.. i i i_ i — I� STUDIO aoRT►1 -_ — FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SITE PLAN MAJOR TENANTS ROCKY'S P!ZZERIA RANCHO NEWSSTANOt- . Medi -Aid RANCHO FOREIGN AUTO PARTS D%VE'S AONUTS AREA ANALYSIS SITE AREA : 91,000 SO. FT OR _ 2.08 ASS SHOP BUILDINGS A a V 24.420 SO F7 PARKING PROVIDED 140 CARS PARKING RATIO 5.73 CARS / 1,000 SO FT O AVAILABLE SPACE AVAILABLE CITY OF ITEM: v Lk Culp 3� RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: °) IT PLANT\TL\r DIVISSION EXHIBIT- I!$" SCALE._ k- E E 0 v A-12 ' I aI4 A.16 - - -_ ?700 /SF B.R t _JL _... � \,. -�•- .v�-- - ii'��� DYNASTY Aerobics - 1 I � I I � � SHOP BUILOIt :G ?700 /SF L9 IIj I 1 DEE DEE'S II I DANCaJEAR and 1 !I L �f+ 1 _ I LI I I �.w I J L !( I� �.. i i i_ i — I� STUDIO aoRT►1 -_ — FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SITE PLAN MAJOR TENANTS ROCKY'S P!ZZERIA RANCHO NEWSSTANOt- . Medi -Aid RANCHO FOREIGN AUTO PARTS D%VE'S AONUTS AREA ANALYSIS SITE AREA : 91,000 SO. FT OR _ 2.08 ASS SHOP BUILDINGS A a V 24.420 SO F7 PARKING PROVIDED 140 CARS PARKING RATIO 5.73 CARS / 1,000 SO FT O AVAILABLE SPACE AVAILABLE CITY OF ITEM: v Lk Culp 3� RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: °) IT PLANT\TL\r DIVISSION EXHIBIT- I!$" SCALE._ k- E E CITY OF RANCHO C=C MONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORYATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review .Fee: $87.00 For all projects re -z "" r_ _ en. _ ronmental re View this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made_ Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analvsis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study_ The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before tine public meeting at which tine the project is to be he4rd. The Co: ittee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental im;�act and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The .>roject will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact� Report will be prepared, or :s) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: AUTO RENTAL APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: JAMES F. CRAPPIE 6940 CANTERWOOJ RD: I 714 5932469 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: same as above LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) _ RANCHO TERRACE ; 9619 FOOTHILL BLVD KA\C€O CUCAOMONGA LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: BOARD OF EquALI; ATICINSALES TAX I -1 r, t PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: RZN NG OF AUTOS ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA :'D SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: office 1050 sa ft. DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFOR *: JON ON TOPOGR PHY, PLANTS (TREES) ES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTliRAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environaental impact? NO 1-2 E r I WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? NO 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? NO 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.) ? NO 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plat. designations? NO 5. Remove any existing trees? Haw manv? NO 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? AM Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the state.*nents furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct -to the best of Try knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Review Co=ittee. AUTO RENTAL Date 8-17-34 Signature awes r, c apple Title owner 5 K- 9 { Sections 17.10.010 &- 17.10.020 CHAPTER 17.10 COMMERCIAL /OFFICE DISTRICTS Section 17.10.010 Purooses and General Plan Consistency A. The following objectives have been formulated for the commercial and office districts for the implementation of the General Plan goals and objectives. I. Provide appropriately located areas for office uses, retail stores and service establishments to meet the needs of the community. 2. Promote and encourage office and commercial locations and designs to be conveniently accessible by bicycle and foot, as well as by automobile. 3. Promote and encourage office and commercial uses to be designed in centers or like groups for the convenience of the public and to avoid creating nuisances among adjacent land uses. 4. Use and promote open spaces and landscaping to create a visually pleasing environment, as well as to distinguish city and neighborhood boundaries. S. Intensified or regional - related commercial uses shall be organized and designed to promote maximum opportunity for transit usage. 6. It is intended that ca)mmercial/office uses and developments will promote social interaction and minimize adverse environmental impacts and resource consumption. 7. Commercial and office developments shall exhibit the highest standards of site planning, architecture and landscape design. Section is _10.020 Commercial Office Districts- These districts have been created for implementation of the goals, objectives and land use designations of the General Plan. A. OfficA!Professiowal District (OP): This district is intended primarily for the development f professional /administrative offices and personal services rather than commoa;.ies. Site development regulations and performance standards are designed to make such uses relatively compatible with residential uses. B. Neighborhood Commercial District (NC): This district is intended to provide areas for immediate day -to-day convenience shopping and services for the residents of the immediate neighborhood. Site development regulations and performance standards are intended to make such uses compatible to and harmonious with the character of surrounding residential or less intense land use area. -97- r I o 11 E 11 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 84 -24 FOR THE OPERATION OF AN AUTO RENTAL USE LOCATED AT 9619 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 23rd day of August, 1984, a complete application was filed by James F. Chappie for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 10th day of October, 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described project. follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as SECTION 1: That the following findings cannot be met: 1. That the proposed use is not in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use does not comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and does not promote and encourage office uses to be designed in centers which avoid creating nuisances among adjacent land uses. 4. That the proposed use is not compatible with the existing neighborhood commercial center. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary K -1 I Resolution No. Page 2 I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plannins Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of October, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: AESEN3: COMMISSIONERS: 11 E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 10, 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Pick Gomez, City Planner BY: Cur*_ Johnston, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN 19% - '- IF4LIN Mt:Wt UVtKLAY U1�)IK1L1 - A beneral flan Amendment from Office to Industrial Park for approximately 40 acres of land located on the west side of Haven Avenue, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Highway, in conjunction with the Haven Avenue Overlay District - APN 208 - 331• -01, 12, 13, and 208 - 341 -01. ASSESSMENT AND DE Development District Amendment from OP (Office /Professional) to ISP (Industrial Specific Plan) and MH (14 -24 du /ac) for approximately 40 acres of land located on the west side of Haven Avenue, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Highway, in conjunction with the Haven Avenue Overlay District - APN 208 - 331 -01, 12, 13, and 208- 341-01. AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT - Rn amendment to the Industrial Specific Plan to expand the boundaries of Subarea 7 (Industrial Park category) to include approximately 40 acres of land located on west side of Haven Avenue, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Highway, in conjunction with the Haven Avenue Overlay District - APN 208- 331 -01, 12, 13 and 208 - 341 -01. I. ABSTRACT: These three items are presented in conjunction with the Haven Avenue Overlay District. The intent is to simplify the implementation of the Overlay District by including all of the study area within the Industrial Specific Plan. This will eliminate duplication of the Overlay District in the Development Code and provide consistency relative to base district standards and zoning. No formal action on these items is necessary at this time. However, the Commission should review the proposed amendments, hold a public hearing to consider public comments, and provide staff with appropriate direction. Final approval should occur concurrently with the Haven Avenue Overlay District at a future hearing. ITEMS L, M, N PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Haven Avenue Overlay District October 10, 1984 Page 2 II. SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Location: '.lest side of Haven Avenue, between Foothill BO levard and Arrow Highway. B. Parcel Size: Approximately 40 acres._ C. Existing Zoning: OP (Office /Professional) D. Existing Land Use: Grapevines exist on the majority of site with a house and barn located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard near the Deer Creek Channel. E. Surroundin-g-_Land Use and Zoning: orth - Virginia Dare Winery, GTE Building, zoned General Commercial. South - Old La Mancha Go.f Course, zoned ISP (Industrial Park, Subarea 7). East - Office Building and County Law and Justice Center under construction, zoned ISP (Industrial Park, Subarea 7); K -Mart, zoned ISP (Commercial, Subarea 7). West - Grapevines, Deer Creek Channel, zoned MH (Medium -High Residential, FC (Flood Control), OP (Office /Professional). F. General Plan Designations: roject Site - Office North - Commercial South - Industrial Park East - Industrial Park, Commercial West - Medium -High Residential (14 -24 du /ac), Flood Control, • Office. III. ANALYSIS: A. Land Uses: The subject property represents a critical portion R the Haven Avenue Corridor. Development of the site under the Overlay District standards will help create an "urban center" and provide a significant gateway into the corridor. As mentioned previously, the proposed amendments will provide a consistent base district for all of the study area and simplify implementation of the Overlay District standards. The various land uses allowed in the OP District and in the proposed Overlay District are similar. The following are the changes to the permitted land uses that will likely occur with approval of the amendments and the Haven Avenue Overlay Ll PLANNING COMMISSIC14 STAFF REPORT Haven Avenue Overlay District October 10, 1984 Page 3 OP Uses Not To Be Additional Uses Permitted by Overlay To Be Permitted by Overlay - Animal Care Facilities - Auto Sales - Car Washes - Gasoline Service Stations - Bookstores - Fast Food Restaurants - Florist Shops - Janitorial Services - Mortuaries and Cemeteries - Commercial Parking Facilities - Recreation Vehicle Storage - Transportation Facilities Bus & Train Depots - Schools and Colleges - Vocational or Trade Schools - Light Manufacturing with CUP only (includes research and development) - Food & Beverage Sales with CUP only (off -site consumption) - Communication Services (telegraph, radio, TV stations) Elimination of the above uses is reasonable considering the ® specific location of the subject 40 acres. The primary land use of the property remains Office and Professional; however, the Overlay District narrows the scope of uses to protect the Corridor for high end projects. B. District Boundary: The subject property is shown on Exhibit A. Near the northwest corner of Arrow Aighway and Haven Avenue the current District boundary beimeen OP and MH follows an existing property line 659' west of Haven Avenue. The proposed boundary between the ISP and MH ?istricts, however, is 310' closer to Haven for consistency with Tentative Parcel Map 8345, recently approved by the Planning Commission (see Exhibit "B "). The raised boundary is necessary to avoid spliting a future parcel between land use districts, but it will add approximately 9.5 acres to the Medium High Residentiai District (14 -24 du /ac). To mitigate potential concerns for proper land use transition and buffering, a condition of the Parcel Map requires a master plan to be processed concurrently with any development application submitted on the property. C. Environmental Assessment: The Initial Study, including the -Environmental Checklist, has been completed and staff found no substantial evidence to indicate significant environmental impacts will result from approval of the proposed amendments. The following is a summary of the major er.vironmentalfactors considered by Staff during preparation of the Initial Study. if the Commission concu -s with Staff's findings, a recommendation to the City Council for approval of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate: -.3 - � �,-�, W PLANNING CO.1MISSION STAFF REPORT Haven Avenue Overlay District October 10, 1984 Page 4 Traffic. The land use change from Office to Residential on the 9.5 acre portion of the site should reduce traffic volume counts by an estimated 1,220 daily trips. This estimate is based upon buildout of the 9.5 acres at the mid -point of the density range (i.e., 19 du /ac). Drainage. Water runoff should less if the property is built designations. The reduction amount of impervious sur'aces portion of the site is ultimz versus office or industrial. be app - oximately six ('c) percent out u­acr the proposed land use is attributable to the lesser if the land use on the 9.5 acre tely multiple family residential Schools. Development of the 9.5 acre residential portion of the site would generate approximately 54 additional students (based on buildout at 19 du /ac). General Plan Consistency. The proposed Development District Amendment :gill not create a technical inconsistency with the General Plan, since the Land Use Map is general in nature and exact zone boundaries are determined by the Development District. Map. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: To approve the Amendments, the Commission should make the following findings: A. That the amendments are consistent with the intent of the General Plan Land Use Policies; and B. That the amendents promote the goals of the Land Use Element; and C. That the amendments would not be materially injurious or detrimental to adjacent properties. V." CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Daily Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the sutject site. To date, no written correspondence has been received either for or against the proposed amendments. E - y- ai° , 77 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Haven Avenue Overlay District October 10, 1984 Page 5 u VI. RECOMMENDATLON: It is recommended that the Planni,•g Commission hold a public hearing on the proposed amendments to cr,nsider public input, and provide Staff with appropriate directir.. However, no formal action is necessary until final consideration of the Haven Avenue Overlay District at the October 24, 1984 Commission Meeting. P.ejectful13K submitted, ickfGd itv }} P1 RG:CJ:ns Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "b" - Haven Avenue Overlay District Map Exhibit "C" - Land Uses Initial Study, Part I C f5c"' u D'EVELOPMEN i DISTRICT MAP _ la I.S.P. �; Cn I: ... ...... .....Q n � � i5!' r .. —1 A ! `aC itn m ! Pry in -4 �qi Ji II Fr. r�■[� SY117 GC m■ M .m a a O a Future City ® F Zli I.J.P. 1� I FIr, IV -7 U LGv'� CITE' OF RANCHO CUC k L \,IO\GA n *,,NTNllNG DIVISION FORTH ITEM- a !oVegq A\/ e. AmepnoA4;Ft y TITLE-1l. yis-r_ nnAvO -4- i . S . ►p EXHIBIT :� SCALE: - _6 0-*7 -� , ►_J E t. MED MITETWE PARCEL, MAP.-NO. 8345 - lank ,H TK c t OF "MCHO COGP/OHCW K.H l M.H�Ow .I.M[ C KfT.'f®IG�wf TD YI W CuUwOM../.O/. .N 2• 1VT .CCbgCG1. fOM wOI wYC. /K[ f. wl[OIOI M ]u. 1l.Wf�.i CfIMt� C1C1 /O.fll. E ITT t:t L` °7 I LI:.iE T4mNE F° n � ' PROPOSED ISP BOUNDARY -� - -- - - - -- - .._ I y� Mi J`•' �--�= i Future City Hall FC MCl . f O7J N x GC ■i�a■ - - -- 1- - Q.S.P. :. .._.:.a � M M ? a a ij stz::: NORTH CITY OF ITEM: 41AV!;-=M A;rt-- .a eNIONEIrc RANCHO CUCANIONGA TITLE: a� rcc>„ab4tr_ PLAINNI,NG DIVISION EXHIBIT: 04L . SCALE: `7- I �- >7 Section 17.10.030 C. General Commercial District (GC): This district is 'intended for general commercial activities and services of a more intensive nature. These uses would be located primarily along major transportation routes and would include major shopping facilities, major service - oriented uses, major financial and corporate headquarters which are designed to serve the City or the region as a whole. Section 17.10.030 Use Regulatsors Uses listed in Table 17.10.030 shall be allowable in one or more of the commercial districts &s indicated in the columns beneath each commercial district. Where indicated with the letter "P ", the use shall be a permitted use in that district. Where indicated with the letter "C ", the use shall be a conditional use subject to the Conditional Use Permit process. In the event there is difficulty in categorizing a given use in one of the districts, the procedure outlined in Section 17.02.040 shall be followed. TABLE 17.10.030 USE REGVLATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL/OFFICE DISTRICTS USE OF NC GC A. Offizes and Related Uses 1. Admiristrative and executive offices. P P P 2. Artist and photographic studios, not P P P including the sale of equipment or supplies. 3. Clerical and professional offices. P P P 4.. Finareial services and institutio" P P P 5. Medics], dental and related health P P P services (rion- animal related) including laboratories and clinics; only the sale of articles clearly incidental to the services provided shall be permitted. 6. Prescription pharmacies, (also when P P P located within a building containing the offices of 5 or more medical practitioners) 7. Public buildings (library, city and county P P P buildings, special districts and post office). 8. Public utility service offices. P P P 9. Public safety facility (police, fire, C C C ambulance and paramedics). �i° YJ1, 7i i rests 6J �1 i Section 17.10.030 MCO,t1 «� USE OP NC GC 10. Related commercial uses (blueprinting, P P P stationary, quick copy, etc.) when incidental to en office building or complex. B. General Commercial Uses 1. Antique shops - P P 2. Adult business (see special requirements - - C per Section 17.10.030) 3. Animal Care acility (animal hospital, veterinarian, commercial kennel, grooming). (a) Excluding exterior kennel, pens, or C P P runs. (b) Including exterior kennel, pens, or - - C runs. 4. Apparel stores. - P P 5. Art, music and photographic studios and C P P supply stores. S. Appliance stores and repair. - C P 7. Arcades (see spacial requirements per - C C Section 17.10.030 E ) J 8. Athletic and Health Club, gyms and P P P weight reducing clinics. 9. Automotive services (including motorcycles, boats, trailer and camper) (a) sales C - C (b) rentals - - C (c) repairs (major engine work, muffler - - C shops, painting, body work and upholstery) (d) C--In-op washing C C C IR (e) Automatic washing C C C MCO,t1 «� Section 17.10.030 USE OP NC GC (f) Service or gasoline dispensing C C P 1 stations (including minor repair such as tune -ups, brakes, batteries, tires, mufflers) (g) Parts and supplies - P D 10. Bakeries (retail only). - P P 11. Barber and beauty shops. P P P 12. Bicycle shops. - P P P P P 13. Blueprint and photocopy services 14. Boat and camper sales and services. - - C 15. Book, gift and stationary stores (other C P P than adult related material). 16. Candy stores and confectionaries. - P P 17. Catering establishments. - - P 18. Cleaning and pressing establishments. C P P 19. Carpenter shop or cabinet shop. - - P 20. Cocktail lounge (bar, lounge, tavern) _ including related entertainment. - (a) Operated independent of a C - C restaurant (b) Accessory to a restaurant C C C 21. Commercial recreation facilities. (a) Indoor uses such as bowling, C C P theaters, biilards, (b) Outdoor uses such as golf, tennis, C C C basketball, baseball, trampolines, etc. 22. Contractor yards (screening of outdoor - - C storage required). 23. Dairy product stores. - P P -100- / "/ Section 1'.10.030 -101 - Ca GC OP NC USE 24. Department stores. - - P 25. Drive -in businesses, including theaters. - C C (other than fast food restaurants) 26. Drug stores and pharmacies. - P P 27. Equipment rental yards. - - C 28. Fast -food restaurants. C C P 29. Feed/Tack stores - C P 30. Florist shops. P P P 31. Food stores and supermarkets. - P P 32. Furniture stores, repair and upholstery. - P P 33. General retail stores. - P P 34. Hardware stores. - P P 35. Home improvement centers. (a) Material stored and sold within - P P enclosed buildings (b) Outdoor storage of material sych as - - C lumber & building materials 36. Hotels and Motels. C - P 37. Ice Machines (outdoor). - C C. 38. Janitoral services and supplies. C P P 39. Jewelry stores. - P P 40. Laundri- self -service. - P P 41. Liquor stores. - P P 42. Kiosks for key shops, film drops, etc. in - C C parking lots. 43. Locksmith shop. - P P 44. Mini- storage for public use (no outdoor - - C storage). -101 - Ca Section 17.10.030 USE OP PAC GC 45. Mortuaries and cemeteries. C C C 46. lfotorcycie sales and service. - - C 47. Newspaper and magazine stores, printing - C P and publishing. 48. Nurseries and garden supply stores; - P P provided, in the NC district, all equipment, supplies and material are kept within an enclosed area. 49. Office and business machine stores. C P P 50. Parking facilities (commercial) whera fees C - P are charged. 51. Political or philanthropic headquarters. C C P 52. Pet shop. _ P P 53. Plumbing shop and supplies. - _ p 54. Photocopy P p P 55. Printing shops. _ _ P 56.. Restaurants (other than fast food). (a) With entertainment and /or sere ^ ;ng C C P of alcoholic beverages (b) Incidental serving of beer and wine P P P but without a cocktail lounge, bar, entertainment or dancing 57. Recreational Vehicle Storage Yard. C C C 58. Shoe stores, sales and repair. - P P 59. Second -hand stores and pawn shops. - _ p 60. Shopping Center subject to provisions in - C C Sec *;on 17.10.030 -F.5. 61. Spiritualist readings or astrology - - P forecasting. 62. Sporting goods stores. _ P p 63. Stamo and coin shops. _ p p E -1G2- �// Section 17.10.030 USE OP IBC GC 64. Swimming pool supplies. - P P 65. Tailor. - ? P 66. Taxiderm'"- - - P 67. Television, radio sale, . and service. - P P 68. Tire sales and service. - - C 69. T oy stores. - P P 70. Travel ag.::.,:ies. P P P 71. Transportation facilities (train and bus, C C C taxi depots). 72. Truck and trailer rent" sales and service. - - C 73. Variety stores. - P P 74. Vehicular storage yard and towing service. - - C C. Public and semi - public uses 1. Day Care Facilities C C C 2.. Convalescent facilities and hospitals. C - C 3. Private and public clubs and lodges, C C C including YbICA, YWCA and similar youth group uses. 4. Educational institutions, parochial, private C C C (including colleges and universities). 5. Libraries & museums, public or private. C C C 6. Parks and recreation facilities, public or C C C private. 7. Public utility installati3ns. C C C 8. Vocational or business trade schools. C C C 9. Churches, convents, ;monasteries and other C C C religious institutions. -103- / I/ -13 Oa GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW APPLICATION INITIAL STUDY - PART I For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Planning Division staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study and make recommendations to Planning Commission. The Planning Commission will make one of three determinations: (1) The project will have no significant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed (2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental impact Report will be prepared, or (3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. Date Filed: October 1 1984 Project Title: GPA 64-04A1 DDA 84 -04, iSP Amend 84 -01 Applicant's Name, Address, Telephone: City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Eon £07 Rancho Cucamon4a California 91710 (714)gg9 IIISi Name, Address, Telephone of Person To Be Contacted Concerning this Project: Curt Johnston, Associate Planner Locati.on of Project: West Side of Haven, between Foothill and Arrow Assessor's Parcel No.: 208 - 331 -01 12 13 and 208 - 341 -01 List other permits necessary from local, regional, state and federal agencies a and "he agency issuing such permits: None r_, E. E. 'J E E-1 \mil IZ ' 1977 GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW APPLICATION INITIAL STUDY - PART I For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Planning Division staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study and make recommendations to Planning Commission. The Planning Commission will make one of three determinations: (1) The project will have no significant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed (2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental impact Report will be prepared, or (3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. Date Filed: October 1 1984 Project Title: GPA 64-04A1 DDA 84 -04, iSP Amend 84 -01 Applicant's Name, Address, Telephone: City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Eon £07 Rancho Cucamon4a California 91710 (714)gg9 IIISi Name, Address, Telephone of Person To Be Contacted Concerning this Project: Curt Johnston, Associate Planner Locati.on of Project: West Side of Haven, between Foothill and Arrow Assessor's Parcel No.: 208 - 331 -01 12 13 and 208 - 341 -01 List other permits necessary from local, regional, state and federal agencies a and "he agency issuing such permits: None r_, E. E. 'J E r1 UJ EIII PROJECT DESCRIPTION Proposed use or proposed project- Amendments from "Of fic " to "ISP Industrial Park Category, Subarea 7 ". Acreage of project area and square footage of existing and proposed buildings, if any :_,jRnrox_ en acrPC - vacant mostly w/ a house & barn at north end of site adjacent to Foothill Blvd. Describe the environmental setting of the project site including information on topography, soil stability, plants (trees), land animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, land use of surrounding properties, and the description of any existing st-uctures and their use (attach necessary sheets): existing Vinevard native vegetation removed, house & barn at north end no significant torso features. 1 Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact No. Project is however related to Haven Avenue Overlay District. 1-2 BILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise of produce vibration; or glare? X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? X 4. Create changes in the existing Zoning or General Plan designations? X 5. Remove any existing trees? Horn many? — X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? — X Explanation of any YES answers above (attach additional sheets if necessary): 7. Estimate the amouort of sewage and solid waste materials this project wili generate daily:_ Not apol. S. Estimate the number of auto and truck trips generated daily by this project: Approx 1220 fewer than current land use 9. Estimate the amount of grading (cutting and filling) required for this project, in cubic yards: Not app l. 10. If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the st the attached exhibits present the data and initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and information -rated are true and correct belief. 1 furth_ -!derstand that additional be submitted before an adequate evaluation Division. Date: 10/1184 Signature Title atements furnished above and in information required for this and that the facts, statements, to the best of my knowledge and l i°ormation be required to :e ate by the Planning I -3 /C lJ LJ E] L J El CITY OF RANCHO CliCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 10, 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Curt Johnston, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRGNMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN A- MENDMENT 84 -02 - HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT - Punning Commission review of public comments and recommendations from the Chamber of Commerce regarding the Interim Development Policies for Haven Avenue, between 4th Street and Foothill Boulevard. I. BACKGROUND: This report outlines recommendations by the Chamber of Commerce Economic Development Subcommittee regarding the Interim Development Policies for Haven Avenue. The intent is to ailow Commission review of the comments prior to the preparation of the final standards. The Draft Haven Avenue Overlay District will be provided for consideration at the October 24, 1984 meeting. In addition, three related items on this agenda are discussed in the following staff report. As the Commission is aware, the west side of Haven Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Highway is currently designated office. To provide a consistent base zoning for the study area and eliminate duplication of the Overlay District in the Development Code, staff is recommending that the land use designation on the property be changed to Industrial Park. The three public hearing items include a General Plan amendment, a Development Districts amendment, and amendment to the ISP, Subarea 7. II. CHAMBER SUBCOMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: As :mentioned, the Interim Development Policies were reviewed by a Chamber of Commerce Economic Deveiop.aent Subcommittee composed of six local developers and real estate brokers. The Committee agreed with the goal statement for Haven Avenue and in general was supportive of the City's effort to promote quality development along the corridor. The Committee did, however, have a number of comments and recommendations as outlined below and shown on Exhibit "A ". Land Use: The Committee agreed with the 20 percent maximum of ancillary commercial and business support uses, but requested that special consideration be given for allowing rail service to light manufacturing uses adjacent to the railroad tracks at 8th Street (see top of page 2, Exhibit "A"). To accommodate this concern, staff suggests that rail service be permitted only when views of ITEM 0 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ISP Amendment 84 -02 /Haven Avenue Overlay District October 10, 1984 Page 2 11 loading areas for both rail and truck traffic is substantially blocked from public streets and surrounding properties within the Overlay District. In addition, the orojeci: design must meet the intent of the Overlay standard and not deter implementation of the design goal on adjacent sites. Master Planned DeyelODmEtlt: The Committee recommended elimination of conceptual architecture for master plans. In their opinion greater flexibility of architectural design is necessary. The Committee also recommended a minor word charge to policies three and four regarding reciprocal parking and public transit. Staff suggests that the requirement for conceptual architecture remain or another policy be provided requiring a consistent design, theme within master planned development. Site Orientation: The Committee had major concerns :with eliminating all parking from Haven Avenue and recommended that parking be allowed on up to 50 percent of the fruntage on any lot and wording revisions to other policies. Staff suggests adding the 50 percent limitation on street parking, but in conjunction with the current wording which discourages parking along the street frontage. This will still provide direction to developers that parking along the frontage is not desirable, but does allok design flexibility. Streetscape and Landscaoino: The Committee recommended that the landscape /hardscape percentage be reduced from 30 percent to 25 percent, except in the urban centers where it should remain at 30 percent. The Comm rtee also recommended that requirements for parkway street furniture be eliminated and chat water conservation landscape, and irrigation techniques be eliminated. Reduction of landscape /hardscape coverage requirement seems appropriate in conjunction with restrictive guidelines defining the design elements and location of pedestrian plazas and courtyards. Regarding parkway street furniture, the Planning Division intends to develop a streetscape design theme with the assistance of a professional designer /landscape architect in the near future. Elements of the streetscape desi5r will most likely include street furniture and signing, as well as ;andscaping. The requirement for water conservation landscape and irrigation techniques should remain also and will be further defined with streetscape design. Open Space and Pedestrian Environment: The Committee recommended that the design of pedestrian plazas not include kiosks or covered walkways but that water features and public art are preferred. The Committee also recommended eliminating the term ' "benches" in reference to seating areas to provide greater flexibility for the v -� E [I] PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ISP Amendment 84 -02 /Haven Avenue Overlay District October 10, 1984 Pare 3 use of raised planters or other types of seating. At the September 24, 1934 hearing, the Commission specifically added covered walkways. As mentioned previously, staff suggests the design elements of pedestrian plazas and courtyards be further clarified which will address the concern. Architecture: The Committee agreed with the progressive, sophisticated and urban style of development for Haven Avenue, but strongly recommended against prohibiting the use of certain architectural styles or exterior materials. The Commit +. e's thought was that a variety of styles and exterior materiai< tali be used effectively to achieve the Haven Avenue image. The Committee also recommended eliminating the prohibition of specific building forms such as low profile., linear, or block forms, since in their opinion these types of architecture can be designed within the intent of the Overlay District. The Committee agreed with the requirement for building signing determined during Design Review but simply requested that the policy refer to the Sign Ordinance regarding the size, number and location of signs. Staff agrees that a variety of architectural materials can be used to achieve the Haven Avenue image. However, the design guidelines have been written to address certain specific problems along the corridor, such as low profile linear buildings with storefront elevations. Also, the General Plan states that a consistent design theme should be maintained to reinforce the image of a street. We would recommend that the interim provisions relating to architectural controls be retained. Urban Centers: Again, the Committee's comments centered around encouraging a variety of construction techniques to achieve the Haven Avei,ue image. The Committee agreed with requiring multiple si -ory buildings, but recommended that the desirable structural components inrlude steel and concrete (i.e., eliminate reference to "Poured in place "). In addition, the Committee recommended eliminating the sentence which discourages wood frame structures. Staff suggests that the architectural policies be revised to discuss desirable building form and articulation versus use of materials. Iv. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Daily Reoort newspaper, the Haven Avenue Corridor posted, and notices were sent to all subject property owners and owners within 300 feet of the Overlay District boundaries. To date, no written ccrrespondence has been received either for or against the proposed G:erla.y District. 0 -3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ISP Amendment 84- 02!Haven Avenue Overlay District October 10, 1984 Page 4 L J V. RECOMMENDATION.- It is recommender th;t the Planning Commission review and consider recommendatio•is of the Chamber of Commerce Economic Develapment Subcommittee and input from other interested Parties, and provide stiff wit', specific direction in each topic area. The public hear: g shod:d then be continued to the October 24, 1984 meeting for - :onsideration of the Draft haven Avenue Overlay District provisions. tte6, itf Planner RG:CJ:jr Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Chamber Revisions to Policies Exhibit "8" - Interim Development Policies P.C. Resolution 84 -99 r .• o-1-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA'PLANNING COMMISSIO`: ESTABLISHING A DESIGN GOAL AND ==RIM DEVELOPMENT POLICIES FROM HAVEN AVENUE BETWEEN 4TH ST-REET AND FOGIHILL BOULEVARD W'r._REAS, the Planning Commission has expressed numerous: concerns with development proposals rece_-_tly submitted on -raver_ Avenue; and bvr =R`AS, there is a need to establish a design goal for Haven Avenue to guide future development; and WHEREAS, ian_ use and development policies are necessary to inplemen: the design goal for Haven Avenue; and W=EREAS, such design and development policies are needed to provide clear direction and guidance to developers and staff alike- " NCW, : "r.EREF01iE, be it resolved that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission does hereby establish interim policies for the development of Haven Avenue between 4th Street and Foothill Boulevard as follows: - SECTION 1: Goal Statement. Considering the setting of Haven Avenue and combin.ng t'ne intent of the General Plan and the Industrial Specific Plan, the goal of the 'raven Avenue development and land use policies is to: Encourage long- range master planned development along : the Haven Avenue corridor which enhances Rancho Cucamo,nga's image by providing an int'- nsive, high quality gateway into the city, and by promoting a distinctive, attractive, and pleasant office park atmosphere in a campus -like setting -.:ith high prestige ide^tity. p SECTION 2: Land Use Policies. The intent of the following policies is to promote land uses and /or development that prootes the design goal for haven Avenue and enhances Rancho Cucamonga's image: 1. The primary lard use function along Haven Avenue is intended to be of an administrative, o "ic °- and professional office nature.'' 2. Select ancillary commercial and business support ` service uses shall not exceed 20% of the floor area in any project. Concentration of such uses in any building or along the street frontage is not permitted.. 0 •i Resolution No. 84 -99 page 2 3. ?add provisions for allowing light Manufacturing With railway .access and loading doors for properties contiguous to railroad right -of -way. S3CT_TOh 3: Master Plan Develop men ts. To encourage integrated and Master Plan Development, the following Policies are establis^ed: 1. Conceptual Yaster ?fans s_ ^-all be submitted with all projects (i.e., any development vrc�csals including subdivision applications) - Master plans shall indicate concept::al building pad locations Points of ingress and egress, V parking lot config-arations, conceptual grading and drainage, landscape and Plaza areas, pedestrian circulation, and signs_ 2. The minim-am parcel dimensions shall be 300 feet wide and 225 feet deep except in the case of condominium lots or lots within a center when designed as an integral Hart of a Master Plan development as defined in the above policy. 3. Vehicular access onto Haven Avenue shall be shared with adjacent parcels to promote smooth and efficient traffic circulation along the corridor_ The minimum distance between drive approaches shall be 300 feet with 100 feet the minimum distance from the curb return of any ir_t0:rsection. Also, reciprocal parking and access easements _ shall be recuired yw.'= a.b. in conjunction with anv development proposal. 4. Public transit facilities shall bek r,n ;-+e-ed �I within all Master Plans. Convenient pedestrian access shall be provided to designated transit facilities at major intersections. S=CTSON 4: Site Orientation. The following policies are intended to promote integrated, pedestrian_ orientated, Office park development in a ca:..pus -like setting_ 1_ Circulation aisles and parking%d'acent Avenue shal .V ® Large parking lots must be located in areas less visible from the street, and circulation shall be provided around the rear and side portions of a site. p - U 4N444MR 4WAKV75% Resolution No. 64 -99 Page 3 3. Site plans should incorporate the use of disbursed parking areas which reduce the necessity for large parking lots, yet provides conven_ent access to buildings, and does nui- interrupt interior pedestrian areas. 4. Building placement at the streetscape setback is strongly encouraged within a.11 developments, particularly on corner lots with hick visibility. 5. Building arrangements must enh3nr_e safe and convenient pedestrian movement on site with nco 0 =$ landscaped courtyards, walkways, and seating areas between buildings_ 6. On site circulation for both pedestrians and vehicles shall consider existing or planned circulation patterns on adjacent properties. Connections shall be made where appropriate to foster more integrated development and enhance pedestrian movement. ?- Ancillary service and loading areas shall be designed and located where least visible from public view or adjacent properties designated "Industrial Park`. SECTION 5: Streetscame and Landscaping. The intent of the followi. ^.g policies is to enhance the visual quality of the streetscape and r.,rovide an attactive and pleasant working environment in a campus -like setting. 1_ A minimumriTw =rry -Fiv (251 percent of net lot area �'. (excludes right -uf -way dedications and private streets) shall be landscape areas and hardscape plazas or courtyards. fei� 2. Variation of landscapelhardscape coverage may be permitted for indi-:idual parcels within master planned developments when the master plan as a whole meets the required coverage and the deviation is consistent with the intent and purpose of the stated design goals for Haven Avenue. 3. A maximum five (5) percent credit toward the required landscape /hardscape coverage may be permitted where appropriate public art is to be displayed in a setting which enhances pedestrian ® spaces and building architecture_ MAVal AWS Resolution ?age 4 4. 5. A 6. 7. No. 84 -99 46A04:0 .. . A consistent streets-cape design the:ae shall e be provided along the Havca Avenue streetscap _ which incorporates intensified landscaping with specimen size trees, alluvial rockscape, rounding, and meandering sidewalks. in additionA street name ripbaw signs are required at all intersections and shall be low profile, natural alluvial rock monument ���� signs with letters indented in a sandblasted T ��r concrete face. Landscaping and berming shall be designed to create visual interest and variety to the streetscape, enhance building architecture, utilities and buffer views of automobiles, pavement, and service areas, and to define enhance the pedestrian walkways and plazas. On- street parking along Haven Avenue shall Prohibited. screen and bey All utilities, including electrical service less than 34.5 KV, shall be undergrounded. S£CTIOIv' 6. Oaer_ Saace /�eCestrian Environment. The intent of tnas section is to enhance opportunities for centralized "r_icular pedestrian spaces separated and/or buffered from ve parking and circulation and to promote pedestria circulation on and off site. 1- Building configuration and placement shall provide for pedestrian courtyards, plazas or open spaces between, and /or adjacent to buildings. 2- The design oL pedestrian plazas or courtyards shall provide shaded seating areas with attractive landscaping. 'In addi ;onAwater features, public art./ _ r �d4 C..wX.� NAM 3. /Light s`ana ds, trash receptacles, and other street furniture shall be in an provided attractive and comfortable setting and shall be designed to enhance the appearance and unction of a site and open space areas. .. 4. Covenient pedestrian circulation shall be provided throughout all projects to connect parking areas and public transit facilities with buildings and pedestrian open spaces. ESC *Aj" � /1 d% AWE E] Resolution SIo. 85 -99 °age 5 SEC-1:3N 7: Architecture. The following policies are C to promote a high quality office park image with high Prestige identity. 1. Desirable architecture along haven Avenue shall 45pJ*y%'b"2 project a progressive, sophisticated, and urban style of development.A variations; in architectural 14W Lyles, construction methods, and mater- a2 A rrac ;_- r- :-aced to achieve this :mace_ ?- ^" :ltiple story buildings of sufficient mass to be in scale and proportion with the Baven Avenue right -of -way and streetscape setba._4 are encouraged.% LAI%#. L0*? 33-. Bui''ings designed with retail type storefront elevat.ons (linear configurations with multiple doorways), and numerous roll -uD doors are - considered to promote overconcent rations of ancillary commercial and business support services and are therefore prohibited. 4- Building entrances shall be well articulated with variation of architectural planes and /or development of courtyards to project a formal entrance appearance. 5_ Variation in depth and angle of architectural planes which create variety and interest in the basic form and silhouette of a building is recsirea. Structures with simplistic srYUare, r-ectangular, or block forms areAdiscouraaed, unless designed to the hichest standards of des;er �11at1ty. 1 6- Tc- articulate the surface of architectural elevations the use of opening and cavities which create texture and shadow patterns and interrupt the continuity of a building plane or surface is encouraged. Architectural treatment of buildings shall not be limited to variation in extericr texture, pattern, color, and materials and /or shallow recesses or projections. ?- Accent treatment such as changes in exterior materials and texture is encouraged in conjunction with variation in the major form giving elements of a structure. a1( *Are Av&W MFF Resolution ;:o. 84 -99 Page 6 8 visibility of ancillary service and loading areas I rom public view and adjoining properties must be ltr 1 -.-'I.a en to the e;. -tent passible to reduce Site design constraints on _`uture adjacent development. 9. Building wail signs shall consist of individual letters or scriz)t. Can signs are prohibited. The size, numbe_ and location of signs as ? ,r_oweA by 41'`O C]`V S °Cn nrriin I1C° shall be submitted with the development Review anplication and reviewed in conjunction with a building design- SECTIO N 8 Urban Centers. The followir_g policies shall apply to development near the kev int n ersections of 4th Street and Haver. Avenue and Foothill Boulevard ad Haven Avenue. The intent is to arorote development at a level of activity and intensity sufficient to create coamunity focal points or "urban centers ". _ �- vultinle story buildings of the highest of_`ice and Professional design quality are required. Desirable structural cocbonents .include stee2A and concrete in conjunction with curtain walls, spandrels and glass./ W0010 FMAAAC? 2. The use of parking structures is encouraced tc Promote intensified development and maximize the site area devoted to urban pedestrian plazas and courtyards. 3. Architecture, site Planning, and landscaping at the Immediate corners of 4th Street and F.aven Avenue simall create an intensive and prestigious gateway IntoP.ancho Cucamonga. 3. The minimum parcel size shall be five (5) acres except is the case of condominium lots or lots within a center when designed as an integral part of a Maser Plan development. S. A minimum 30% of net lot area shall be landscape areas and hardscaae plazas or courtyards. I C V V Y 'gyp �J ,•� •�' ��. 2 �?c e )t r - \ l RESOLUTION %0. 54 -99 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COtf.MISSION ESTA3LIS4It1G A DESIGN GOAL AND INTERIM DEVELOPMENT POLICIES FOR HAVEN AVENUE BETWEEN 4TH STREET AND FOOTFALL BOULEVARD WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has expressed numerous concerns with development proposals recently submitted on Haven Avenue; and :WHEREAS, there is a need to establish a design goal for Haven Avenue to ouide future development; and WHEREAS, land use and development policies are necessary to implement the design goal for Haven Avenue; and WHEREAS, such design and development policies are needed to provide clear direction and euidance to developers and staff alike. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission does hereby establish interim policies for the development of Haver, Avenue between 4th Street and Foothill Boulevard as follows: SECTION 1: Goal Statement. Considering the setting of Haven Avenue and combining the intent of the General Plan and the Industrial Specific Plan, the goal of the Haven Avenue development and land use policies is to: Encourage Iona -range master planned development along the Haven Avenue corridor which enhances Rancho Cucamonga's image by providing an intensive, high quality gateway into the city, and by promoting a distinctive, attractive, and pleasant office park atmosphere in a campus -like setting with high prestige identity. SECTION 2: Land Use Policies. The intent of the following policies is to promote land uses andior development that promotes the design goal for Haven Avenue and enhances Rancho Cucamonga's image: I. The primary land use function along Haven Avenue is intended to be of an administrative and p,•ofessional office nature. 2. Select ancillary commercial and business support service uses shall not exceed 200 of the floor area in any project. Concentration of such uses in any building or along the street frontage is not permitted. SECTION 3: Master Plan Develcoments. To encourage integrated and Master Pi an Dever opment, the following policies are established: G� ~® y MOS. a Resolution No. S4 -99,— Page 2 k l El Conceotual '-'aster Plans shall be submitted with all projects (i.e., any development proposals including subdivision applications), Master Plans shall indicate concEptual building pad locations and architecture, points of ingress and egress, parking lot configurations, conceotual grading and drainage, landscape and plaza areas, pedestrian circulation, and signs. 2. The minima -i parcel dimensions shall be 300 feet wide and 225 feet deep except in the case of condominium lots or lots within a center when designed as an integral part of a Master Plan development as defined in the above policy. 3. 'Vehicular access onto Haven Avenue shall be shared with adjacent parcels to promote smooth and efficient traffic circulation along the corridor. The minimum distance between drive approaches shall be 300 feet with 100 feet the minimum distance from the curb return of anv intersection. Also, reciprocal parking and access easements shall be required in conjunction with any development proposal. 4. Public transit facilities shall be designed within all Master Plans. Convenient pedestrian access shall be provided to designated transit facilities at major intersections. SECTION 4: Site Orientation. The following policies are intended to promote integrated, pedestrian orientated, office park development in a campus -like setting. 1. Circulation aisles and parking along street frontages and between buildings through the interior of a project shall be avoided unless there are unusual circumstances. Large parking lots must be located in areas less visible from the street, and circulation shall be provided around the rear and side portions of a site. 2. Site plans should incorporate the use of disbursed parking areas which reduce the necessity for large parking lots, yet provides convenient access to buildings, and does not interrupt interior pedestrian areas. 3. Building placement at the streetscape setback is strongly encouraged within all develooments, particularly on corner lots with high visibility. 4. Building arrangements must enhance safe and convenient pedestrian movement_ on site with uninterrupted landscaped courtyards, walkways, and seating areas between buildings. ldJ 11 I] Resolution °o. S- - -a Page 3 5. On site circulation for both pedestrians and vehicles shall consider existing or planned circulation patterns on adjacent properties. Connections shall be made where appropriate to foster more integrated development and enhance pedestrian movement. o Anc411ary service and loading areas shall be designed and located where least visible from public view or adjacent properties designated "Industrial Park ". SECTION 5: Streetscaoe and Landscaoino. The intent of the following policies is to ennance the vtsuai quality of the streetscape and provide an attractive and pleasant working environment in a campus -like setting. 1. A minimum thirty (30) percent of net lot area (excludes rieht -of=say dedications and private streets) shall be I andscape areas and hardscape plazas or courtyards. 2. Variation of landscape /hardscape coverage magi be permitted for individual parcels within master planned developments when the master plan as a whole meets the required coverage and the deviation is consistent with the intent ana purpose of the stated design goals for Haven Avenue. 3. A maximum five (5) percent credit toward the required landscape / hardscape coverage may be permitted where appropriate public art is to be displayed in a setina which enhances pedestrian spaces and building architecture. 4. A consistent streetscape design theme shall be provided along the Haven Avenue streetscape which incorporates intensified landscaping with specimen size trees, alluvial rockscape, mounding, and meandering sidewalks. In addition, parkway street furniture of a consistent contemporary design shall be provided by all projects. Street name signs are required at all intersections and shall be low profile, natural alluvial rack monument signs with letters indented in a sandblasted concrete face. 5. Landscaping and berming shall be designed to create visual interest and variety to the streetscape, enhance building architecture, screen utilities and buffer views of automobiles, pavement, and service areas, and to define and enhance the pedestrian walkways and plazas. D -�3 aea Resolution ;;o, ga_go Page -. 1 - •ioa• 6, dater conservation landscape techniques are required such as the use of drought tolerant plant species and irrigation systems :which include drip emitters, low volume steam rotors, deep waterino of trees and shrubs, tensiometers to measure soil moisture, and automatic timers. 7- On- street parking along Haven Avenue shall be prohibited. 8. All utilities, including electrical service less than 34.5 KV, shall be undergrounded. SECTION 6: Open Soace /Pedestrian Environment. The intent of this section is to enhance opportunities for centralized pedestrian spaces separated and /or buffered from vehicular parking and circulation and to promote pedestrian circulation on and off site. 1. Building configuration and placement shall provide for Pedestrian courtyards, plazas, or open spaces between and /or adjacent to buildings. 2. The design of pedestrian plazas or courtyards shall provide shaded seating areas with attractive landscaping and should include water features, public art, kiosks, and covered walkways. 3. Benches, light Stan ards, trash receptacles, and other street furniture shall be provided in an attractive and comfortable setting and shall be designed to enhance the appearance and function of a site and open space areas. 4. Convenient pedestrian circulation shall be provided throughout all projects to connect parking areas and public transit facilities with buildings and pedestrian open, spaces. SECTION is Architecture. The following policies are intended to promote a high quality office par!c image with high prestige identity. 1. Desirable architecture along Haven Avenue shall project a progressive, sophisticated, and urban style of development. Spanish. Mediterranean, or traditional architecture with predominant use of stucco, 'good siding, shake, or the roofs is considered to be inappropriate. 2. Variations in architectural styles, construction methods, and materials for certain ancillary uses, such as restaurants and banks, may be approved in cases where a particular design is necessary and more appropriate considering the intended use of a building. E. II �J r�.,E. As. air-" 3 J Resolat,on No. S4 -90- ?age J 3. Multiple story buildings of sufficient mass to be in scale and proportion with the Haven Avenue right -of -way and streetscape setback are encouraged. Low profile linear buildings constructed at the stree*_scape are discouraged. 4. Buildings aesigned with retail type storefront elevations (linear configurations with multiple doorways), and numerous roll -up doors are considered to promote overconcentrations of ancillary commercial and business support services and are therefore prohibited. 5. Buildina entrances shali be well articulated .aith variation of architectural planes and /or development of courtyards to project a formal entrance appearance. 6. Variation in depth and angle of architectural planes :which create variety and interest in the basic form and silhouette of a building is required. Structures with simplistic square, rectangular, or block forms are prohibited. 7. To articulate the surfaces of architectural elevations the use of openings and cavities which create texture and shadow patterns and interrupt the continuity of a building plane or surface is encouraged. Architectural treatment of buildings shall not be limited to variation in exterior texture, pattern, color, and materials and /or shallow recesses or projections. S. Accent treatment such as changes in exterior materials and texture is encouraged in conjunction with variation in the major form giving elements of a structure. 9. Visibility of ancillary service and loading areas from public view and adjoining properties must be limited to the ext-ant possible to reduce site design constraints on future adjacent development. 10. Building wail signs shall consist of individual letters. Can signs are prohibited. The size, number and location of signs shall be submitted with the Development Review application and reviewed in conjunction with a building design. SECTION 8: Urban Centers. The following policies shall apply to development near the key intersections of 4th Street and Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue. The intent is to promote development at a level of activity and intensity sufficient to create comanunity focal points or "urban centers ". Resolution No. 84 -99, Page o BY: 1- "lvltiple story buildings of the highest office and professional design quality are required. Desirable structural components include steel and poured in place concrete in conjunction with curtain walls, spandrels and glass. Wood frame structures are discouraged. 2. The use of oarking structures is encouraged to promote intensified develooment and maximize the site area devoted to urban pedestrian plazas and courtyards. 3. Architecture, site planning, and landscapin- at the immediate corners of 4th Street and Haven Avenue shall create an intensive and prestinious gatetjay into Rancho Cucamonga. 4- The minimum parcel size shall be five (5) acres exceot in the case of condominium lots or lots within a center when designed as an integral part of a Master Plan develooment. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1984. 1 ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA S L. /Stot Cr.ai1 1 all Rick - GOfnez, Deputy Secretary R. c. I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Corrnission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular eetirg of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of September, , by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, BARKER, MCNIEL, STOUT NO REMPEL -% Me 08 & 3 El El E E 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA VIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 10, 1984 TO: Chairman ani Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Linda D. Daniels, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84 -42 - BARMAKiAN - The development of a 2 -story medical office building totaling 19,100 sq. ft. on 1.07 acres of land in the Industrial Park category (Subarea 6) located at the northwest corner of haven Avenue and Trademark Avenue - APN 210- 381 -01. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Apprcval of a site plan and architectural design for development and the issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Purpose: Development of a 19,100 square foot 2 -story medical office building. C. Location: She northwest corner of Haven Avenue and Trademark Avenue. D. Parcel Size: 1.07 acres. E. Existing Zoning: Industrial Park (Subarea 6). F. Existina Land Use: Vacant. G. Surroundinq Land Use and Zonin North - Vacant, Industries a k (Subarea 6). South - Industrial Park. East - Industrial Park. West - Industrial Park. H. General Plan Desicnations: Project Site - Industrial Park. North - Industrial Park. South - Industrial Park. East - Industrial Park. West - Industrial Park. ITEM P PLANNING COP -0MISSION STAFF Environmental Assessment Page 2 REPORT and DR 84 -42 - Barmakian I. Site Characteristics: The subject site is presently vacant with no suostailtial vegetation existing. The street improvements for both Haven Avenue and Trademark Avenue are also existing, except for sidewalks. !I. ANALYSIS: A. General: The project site is located along Haven Avenue and therefore falls under the review and requirements of the interim Haven Avenue Guidelines. Although the interim guidelines were adopted by the Planning Commission after this project was submitted, this project is in compliance with the intent of these interim standards with the exception of providing a pedestrian focal point. The applicant meets the ir,,ent of the standards in terms of occupancy, building use, design and materials, landscaping, parking location and building height. B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee made four recommendations which will bring the project into conformity with the intent of the Haven Avenue Guidelines. One of these recommendations dealt with the extension of the sidewalks leading from the building entrances to both Haven Avenue and Trademark Avenue. A second recommendation was for providing a meandering sidewalk along Trademark Avenue. It was stated by the Committee that in order to provide for a meandering sidewalk there would be a need for easements on the private property since the meandering walk will not be entirely within the public right -of -way. A third recommendation dealt with providing a pedestrian focal point at the north building entrance. The Committee suggested that the applicant provide a fountain which incorporates the brick veneer used on he building. The final recommendation related to the color of the proposed brick veneer. The Committee felt that the brick veneer sample provided should have more of a red tone. It wc; a recommendation of the Committee, therefore, that the applicant bring other brick samples for further review. C. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project and determined that with the recommended conditions of approval the project is consistent with applicable standards and ordinances. D. Grading Committee: The Grading Committee has given conceptual approval of the preliminary grading plan subject to modifykng the drainage so that it flows in the parking area and goes to the south and west via curb and gutter. 11 E 11 J Environmental Assessment and DR 84 -42 - Bar•,akian Page 3 E. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant. Staff has completed the environmental checklist and has found no significant adverse environmental impacts as a result of this project. Staff would, therefore, recommend that the Comrission issue a Negative Declaration for this project. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The proposed use, building design and site plan, together with the recommended Conditions of Approval, is in compliance with all applicable City standdr•ds and ordinances, the Indust-iial Area Specific Plan interim development policies for Haven Avenue, and the General Plan. In addition, the project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environmental impacts. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has bEen adva.tised for Environmental Assessment r =_view in The Daily Report newspaper. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends issue a Negative Declaration for the by adopting the attached Resolution. I . -- Respectfully submitted, Rick Gomez City Planner RG:.LD: -is Attachments: Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Initial Resolut that the Planning Commission project and approve DR 84 -42 "A" - Location Map "Bu - Site Plan "C" - Site Utilization Plan "Du - Conceptual Landscape Plan "E•" - Grading Plan "F" - Building Elevations Study, Part I ion of Approval .... ....... CITY OF ITEM:- QR 84- 42 RANCHO CLICK- k1- I0\'GA TI T LL: CATION nA9 PLANNING i)IVI$K).NT ili3IT- °A P -ti' E NORTH E 12 E I t3 J -_�1 �L TRADEMARK STREET i 1 _ DETAILED SITE PLC ,n 01020 60 60 TAW AMON ZONE SUBAREA- 6/5IDl15TiaAL PARK PROPOSED USE MmICAL /OFFICE OCCUPANCY GROIN` GRP_ B-2 TYPE of CCOCSTRUCTION TYPE V N APPLICANT: ANDREW BARMAKIAN 9375 ARCHMALD AVE SUE 46,688 2% It 1-07 a 100% RANCHO CUCAMONGA. C0. 91730 quaz G foouww &400 Sr. tL 20% 967 -3084 t-dal gross 19,100 s4 It t:Aal net 0 16,300 s% tL ARCWIEC7/II:dNEER: THE BAAMAfl1AN CO. PARKII KI requred 6S 9375 ARCHIBALD AVE Provided 65 RANCHO CUCAIUONGA. CA 91730 PARKNQ'DMVE AREA 20.416 rq ti 44% 987 -3084 LANDSCAP1fw a:ad WALKS 16,872 sty tL 36% �� pp �� Ouw wr...�try comma bea....«eal. w .wwc..e. D lF�I I'��++ �.�f L. BUgppLDINIG T."*-... 1NORTii N/W CORNER OF HAVEN AND TRADEMARK RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA- CITY Or ITr%I: 00- 8442 RANCHO CLC.,. NIONL GAL TITLE: SITE PuqN PLkN \I \G DIt' \ EXIiIBIT: �r�.. S.^_ALE: _ r-S SI VICiNTY MAP DETAILED SITE PLC ,n 01020 60 60 TAW AMON ZONE SUBAREA- 6/5IDl15TiaAL PARK PROPOSED USE MmICAL /OFFICE OCCUPANCY GROIN` GRP_ B-2 TYPE of CCOCSTRUCTION TYPE V N APPLICANT: ANDREW BARMAKIAN 9375 ARCHMALD AVE SUE 46,688 2% It 1-07 a 100% RANCHO CUCAMONGA. C0. 91730 quaz G foouww &400 Sr. tL 20% 967 -3084 t-dal gross 19,100 s4 It t:Aal net 0 16,300 s% tL ARCWIEC7/II:dNEER: THE BAAMAfl1AN CO. PARKII KI requred 6S 9375 ARCHIBALD AVE Provided 65 RANCHO CUCAIUONGA. CA 91730 PARKNQ'DMVE AREA 20.416 rq ti 44% 987 -3084 LANDSCAP1fw a:ad WALKS 16,872 sty tL 36% �� pp �� Ouw wr...�try comma bea....«eal. w .wwc..e. D lF�I I'��++ �.�f L. BUgppLDINIG T."*-... 1NORTii N/W CORNER OF HAVEN AND TRADEMARK RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA- CITY Or ITr%I: 00- 8442 RANCHO CLC.,. NIONL GAL TITLE: SITE PuqN PLkN \I \G DIt' \ EXIiIBIT: �r�.. S.^_ALE: _ r-S a1 - I Q a. 2 I o' 1 n i = L i t I .. DETAILED SITE PLC ,n 01020 60 60 TAW AMON ZONE SUBAREA- 6/5IDl15TiaAL PARK PROPOSED USE MmICAL /OFFICE OCCUPANCY GROIN` GRP_ B-2 TYPE of CCOCSTRUCTION TYPE V N APPLICANT: ANDREW BARMAKIAN 9375 ARCHMALD AVE SUE 46,688 2% It 1-07 a 100% RANCHO CUCAMONGA. C0. 91730 quaz G foouww &400 Sr. tL 20% 967 -3084 t-dal gross 19,100 s4 It t:Aal net 0 16,300 s% tL ARCWIEC7/II:dNEER: THE BAAMAfl1AN CO. PARKII KI requred 6S 9375 ARCHIBALD AVE Provided 65 RANCHO CUCAIUONGA. CA 91730 PARKNQ'DMVE AREA 20.416 rq ti 44% 987 -3084 LANDSCAP1fw a:ad WALKS 16,872 sty tL 36% �� pp �� Ouw wr...�try comma bea....«eal. w .wwc..e. D lF�I I'��++ �.�f L. BUgppLDINIG T."*-... 1NORTii N/W CORNER OF HAVEN AND TRADEMARK RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA- CITY Or ITr%I: 00- 8442 RANCHO CLC.,. NIONL GAL TITLE: SITE PuqN PLkN \I \G DIt' \ EXIiIBIT: �r�.. S.^_ALE: _ r-S I SUBAREA 6 OF PIDUSMAL SPECIRC PLAN I I I I E— — I I I �d I 1 I I mss` . -111� I �,s I I SITE UTILIZATION PLAN I f O 40 80 760 320 DALE MEDICAL ��Ii�C Pv New CORNER OF HAVEN AND TRADEMARK RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA. \ORTH CITY 0I1 ITI7`.1= OR 94 -42- RA\CHO CUC-- iN'10\TGA TITLE SITE: u-nUZaTlopr pLpr4 PLANNING 1JI\111 10\i - L \I i1Iii T : "C" jG1(L'- 11 E 11 e*zOPOSm MWECr wsc : cucAA.owc.. srm -__Cu SS PARR i I "PA D ------- -- - - -- APK -- — ST�.- C�R= jr ICI I W fS � EXMTNG' I wAnnt OuunNG9 �c Imm. --== -WTEM tSE 41' _ � I / I I I I I E— — I I I �d I 1 I I mss` . -111� I �,s I I SITE UTILIZATION PLAN I f O 40 80 760 320 DALE MEDICAL ��Ii�C Pv New CORNER OF HAVEN AND TRADEMARK RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA. \ORTH CITY 0I1 ITI7`.1= OR 94 -42- RA\CHO CUC-- iN'10\TGA TITLE SITE: u-nUZaTlopr pLpr4 PLANNING 1JI\111 10\i - L \I i1Iii T : "C" jG1(L'- 11 E 11 TRADEMARK. AVE. LEGEND A SERMEO LAWN AREAS 8 COUNDATION PLANTINGS C G"FOUNDCOVER PLANTINGS 0 RAISu.D PLANTERS E SCREEN PLANTINGS F SIDEWALK G fRAS..I ENCLOSURE H ACCENT TREES I CANbPY TREL. J SILHOUETTE TREES K STREET TREES `u CONCEPTUAL LAN®SCA E O i-0-20 50 80 u associates U� � I I ✓ �l ®ALE _ _ MEDICAL. BUILDING NORTH N /%V CORNER OF HAVEN AND TRADEMARK RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA- CITY `Jr I? 1: \i: 09- 84 -42 RANCHO CUC NDNG.A TM-E1 C CNCEP TVAL LQNoscaf;E t'r PLANNING ICI \'IS?UV La llrrt' �C _ S \LE, � — 1 rrj Tvies GRADING PLAN 013-20 510 so DALE MIGAL RING N/{K CORNER OF HA%TN AND TRADEMARK RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA � I�ORi'i i *Aw CITY Or RANCHO ITI -\I: I)R 84-42 —� RANCHO CU( AN GA TITLE: f�rattirtA Plan I)]VLjIrJ.\ \iiIl31T "F - -- SC%LE= W, I • E u 0 -; .-4 i j GRADING PLAN 013-20 510 so DALE MIGAL RING N/{K CORNER OF HA%TN AND TRADEMARK RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA � I�ORi'i i *Aw CITY Or RANCHO ITI -\I: I)R 84-42 —� RANCHO CU( AN GA TITLE: f�rattirtA Plan I)]VLjIrJ.\ \iiIl31T "F - -- SC%LE= W, I • E u 0 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review: Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this fogmn must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analvsis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Studv. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Com=ittee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will. have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: DALE- MEDICAL BUIT.DI %G APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Andrew Barmakian 9575 Archibald Ave., S'e. 10' R1'CbQ ^- =c3 C4 o17-;p ��141 Q37 -e0fi� NA-"L, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT:— Peter J. Pitassi, AIA =ame :i= ahoy LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) North west corner of Haven and Trademark. Parcel %hn 5157 Assessor= Parcel _" 11 of LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AiND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THr AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: : UUU. -1 i I -1 P 10 El L' J PROJECT DESC_T',IPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The proposed project consists of a two story medical office nuildi= :m d arijoinina nn -cit- na+ -kin^ c,ril i-icc ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQU_akE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 1.07 acres Proposed building gross :irca: 19,10D square rect. DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE .NCLUDING INFORM-ATICN ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS) The site topography consists of a gentle slope from north east to south Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have Sig- 1ificant environmental impact? XO E. WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO XX 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? XX 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? XX 3. Create a substantial chance in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? XX 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? XX 5. Remove any existing trees? How manv? XX 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous :materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation_ of any YES answers above: IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. N/A CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and infor:ation required for this initial evaluation to the best of =7 ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my know -ledge and belief. I further understand that additional in'_ -)rmation may be required to be submitted+ a re an adequate evaluation car, be made bra — velopment Pk Co.=ittee. Date August 15, 19S.3 S Title_ President, The BARb1AKIAN COMPANY I -3 /0-/a El RESOLUTION NO. A F.._SOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 84 -42 LOCATED ON THE 74ORTHWEST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND TRADEMARK AVENUE IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DIST' -(i'T WHEREAS, on the 28th day of August, 1984, a complete application was filed by The Barmakian Company for re%iew of the above- described project; and WHEREAS, on the 10th day o�,' October, 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a reeting i.c a nsider the above - described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rdncho Cu':amonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the fol7rding can be met: 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on October 10, 1984. SECTION 1: That Development Review No. 84 -42 is approved subject to the following conditions aid attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION: 1. A pedestrian focal point be provided in the area of the ncrth building entrance which is in conformance with the interim Haven Avenue Guidelines. 2. The on -site pedestrian walkways shall be extended to connect to the off -site pedestrian walkways on Haven Avenue and Trademark Avenue. P /3 Page Z 3. A meandering public sidewalk Trademark. 4. The grading shall be revise, so Parkins area drain to the south gutter. ENGINEER'NG DIVISION: shall be provided on that the flows in the and west via curb ano I- Easements will need to be recorded, prior to the issuance of permits, which w41i provide for the meandering sidewalk on Trademark Avenue, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10th DAY OF OCTOBER, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCX40NGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Cnairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planring Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of October, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: 11 E f O O V c ti C O O U O Q 0 N Iu t ° oc w _ I f LL. V M r O V y � ` r o •J O L. j g C O 7 _ r .• - ^_ V_ _ OL .n Orl1L •� 9 O - � • O �. .n ,c - O n'�O L .. C O -s J .n -O - U O .Vi d`p4 d CO wGV °' UJ _ `Y `J-LOG •i -J p — Q ESL N��n °GO��- - nYy 0 CN c V�PV --4 r `= 3.2 V fGJ up V j- „.- -w; Q' = V n •. C C CV ^•J tJ O O - fJ T_ O n g - �� r O � _ L 0 r VEr Gr =V y r O' -J ;;z Ell a VL r {npOrp.'n0 LI _ � V y n y, Y r �C' 9 QV �C V•°i• Li• O t`rn`j_.Y.3' G PVC ru V U. NYC -�i 4 VlP -'00 y 6YG n VnuOnJ GV -nu• 4Y ir� ciV CVY Si _ _ e.vr 9 `pP nOdV V -� Orp• Gc �`'Y LYr url O C O V_ C_ O V 4 Y. r�q O ��n P� 'tea ;.,•-'`do ru � r =�N ^. e t 'P_q -o ° O Y �' P V r� v � �. r�'^ 4_ r L _.r u• 4 `'O n O L G G4 4' C ]-. N 6 `.- = I- E NH �� n M G r9 O OVV9 S1dVTw p9. OTO' L?�JO [��jN.�•rnt r. >•-__ •n �_� NGd7 7 V' O -v T� M ¢ r a> S t � J .- G 4 �' G C` v L •Ur _ .a •+ O C J _ u 4 r'= r r ii - a a V� V O m = c 1� V E L •V. = O 4�= r- i V w i ✓� - - a -Sr` CI •n .r d Y V �Nr �UJ4 .n nOV 0�, =4 �y rrl n T �` d� V n d 4 x •r 1 9 3 C � ^ 0 0 2i r S V� L L r� � to.o L O O S '- -�- O — r V ar„ r x rt n�paJ <n`cL o rI 0 O O V c ti C O O U O Q 0 N Iu t ° oc w _ I f � ` r o T ~MO p — --4 r `= 3.2 V j- OI C y NC V4_ a VL r {npOrp.'n0 LI � � V y y, Y r �C' 9 QV �C V•°i• Li• Lr O. O ^J`o O V U. NYC 4 9 C O V_ C_ O V 4 O O U Y pry e t n ° O Y P V r� v girl I- E NH �� C S C G r9 a [��jN.�•rnt r. a � /s 0._ O T u J G ✓ q .� r G C• -' ✓. C— ✓ v ^. T V _ V 9 ✓. ✓ C^ V �_ L C^ N i r q V O G u� f U C L f c ,CO, O V u y O V Nu O N V u V✓ r >,u O L Y O� V V r. C Z 4 �� V C �_ r C✓ V G r C_ V «t r V C 9 N C Cr r O '� � 9 ✓� n '� -' � .Vn V ^E LGLVL pn.^G ° = =CNCU °C nCU[ =' CTS` � x ✓d = .>p p c u ✓. NLn n-_ -.our. ✓'. p > C ... v s v x i y L r — v G• L _ 1: C E^ `, u O T S C C_ V U � i ✓� n <= 7� d c y C, .—r, ✓ V l _ � C SC - VVf —3 Z i ✓._ q CV .n .a 9_O�ZV i•_�. q =CGL✓. Vt v=... CgmC CiN p =F�L mT° Lc'�� � T � LV S w. V C C � L ✓r T. V_ V G _ O ✓ <• c ` .n T. n u l ✓ t - V w C _ C/ � x 6 rn OE - — .n ^ = —✓V6C u u � ✓G..l == cr'M =C =�V. CGU V`r CC4 MC SI GL,,,O �4� Ce Ta• vL `x✓1M -!CT _ n0`� - 4 rLn ✓ V V J V' T V C— ✓_ U L C` L C O O N V L S C G. u E 7 V 4 C< q i✓ G' � ^� r rc Tu— � O u� J N � V 4 C C E O ~cLO y� V — ✓_✓ ✓SO q c+c.�°.o+ � —C -- °. ✓C 'c c � oq'c✓ «rC.+�V ,J✓ °« -`c L✓ _ va G. �- -'. .T✓° V.- =o w _.. � c `_.« o Loc c. -.> °cam c. :! - 5. •:. -= o orLO - �- „° -cM - .._ -c._ ryG• � :c wcM aoj c✓ ° oY c o c .�cao r`'. c.r= oai - °aEi. °�° :cc� o «c� cL. •'-. =d ✓r` `LC'J ✓.L+jV .r'. ,L�v .',. C{ CV G. _ .a✓^. L <4 IOQ w.7JL C6�L VgC6 °��r LGN N� ✓• r i Z w V V � C � .Yr. ✓. V �� � G G r'r' ^ —i GC GpnV C—i I+^ Cq ` m r V N C O cu C V T C' „ q 9C .yC4 �� >-VC _ w<S_ �UTL♦ S,OVw .O C � t__OT,+V GV » Cr ✓G rLC G b.°.� Y VG C _ <.� ✓V r. G UZ— CGr•� Q C.C,CS' N 4 u O C 'C t O p _ V p N— - 6 q V y .n S y^ y✓ � .—.. - L— C .Ji..n S .n ? _. q C— q V ` S .Sn V✓ V M�� G C..C. q .n •Ca L ✓c G' •' l .n V .n .n -GJ v Cp ` __ "_ awe °r Qi_ '^'o� -_V r•6 WS M LO<' V V C L -O nL UO JLr.. V I�VwOL •o�qC C' - nV COq✓ _ �V..0 um o^` -✓ c=_ r cG. :'cC ✓ rCL 75Y ✓MVO .- uL `f-` G _ _✓ --I 4_G rYC SO— GG✓.n _„G 9 N Z x .n V L L' � w — �. G U Z C C u C C� — u ✓r ` l C CQV `. ✓.` � LSt .]V L �� TMgq .f i�<L —t< O:. q ? C� ^_ V G _ C - - J G, n V L � ." G G. _ O ^ � C �. _ C S] .r• � _ _ 'n - � E r � G.'• Cn p r f M °_� �2� � NJ_ _• - 7TL� d_J _ P. O J�� -�O OV l L C Y L •_ T •--• a a l p C -J C- � G. C � O O J � A _ _ •- J ci - u C� •r v -• o_ E- 4 W T y __ r • C U� L � O+O V-� T C r O U V U N d _ _� J L ^v P Y` •dj „E N� <C_; L. N O Vw O�c-0� rVG O Cr ' C Gt V�.•� _c d r N cc -. - ct� moo_ _ 4 •o N ~ .-w N_ N _� C Oi ....r e - Y> r L V � N T •.w = �. r � e � J_ LEA A w p P O I NI I i U C V V L -. C• V C C _ C L C r O G 6 C 7 C p N 3 V 4 i 6p A • ro r N of A Ldeo rt �� V_ i ye• '-d er �C - nCO N�reEr �V° V'N cV 6_ cc a LS Js _ Jcr ^-. 7z A a•c C� LU'-�> Ne A _ y- <-r O _O oKI O•`r• �r OI 4 •n L b 06 L 1 S �- 9 O'aN ' O 7 r Va � r = V` L -_ .-n 7 i° C- = _` V G ♦ u r .s - or ..• o °L - A� a{ - - a c A c N4c- ctZ eL °� e L z- Ao� :� •. -_ `cz -� A of �- r•oN N = ^L e0 <i = eu eo c�.o.• _L a ? -- c 5 °�� ;. -�= V40 eo 1 •n � V f. r C ri�P '- -"I � c,' s� O c - v—. z _ `" � .=i e o q ��—°• ci�� c� V - 7 � ^I n r O _ _ -•L O• O. `� O ALrA r L N Ja V A d A U �Ga 1 }I haw 6V <c I cl j C r{ N n JI V1 A I C /0-/7 7 f M N C n� O u V ^J 0 rM 11 R C n -T M .. c.. _ G_ - c..: L ur NI Tp9 nyn Oi VV V<-• TU O ` OU : ✓LnV LO 7� Ly°, yv_ O zi y Cf._ G= r C C n F C n V ✓ ✓ �• �_ V � � _N _u F .V. � _ of c M s.°+.L. oo __ = u >✓ E d E � E ra. v � _ ` =- T� 'Lr •C; O VI:T c Qi =Ci.V� u V _ NQ -= n�. -• _ o.. - ° ✓- n - - a<, of drn oJ�°• °='e -.c o4�� -� -'� - ✓ _G -_ -- <'G� �° of •J o'. ✓ ✓non � > � L _L �.� vim ni i � �` Gj U F SL N` Or == � �O`c.' a_� `C ^a✓ V n C: r• U GOG -` <!.9 NN �V� '� ✓� < T S �q V q0 ✓ O N O� T �_ u M E V � V - r - f _ rn 6 M _ •_n . OCC U• T� U Cv _ �_� G ki' O� _- � U> �i _ rMG4 ��O iV y y '� ✓ V G n O V u N L v u O 9� ✓� �7 Nc G A ~I G�� O•✓ O L d �IrC' L 9 V -' V N r _rn ._i. i rnE V= O G UT O -_ ✓ U 'n V VI � G_ c_ cv.• O•M C •n✓ O I r V u c T C� q a - _ O N n d ✓✓ ✓ l -- _O 9 InI ^'y WYV q= N d � V�n2 Qr - N ry �!• OI I •' � N OI .dr NI _" V O � 2 .� O n c � Cr ✓ .e " T .a 9 ✓_ y i� ✓7 V C._ 0 ` C9 d �Q _ E ✓o- Iv I 2 oocv � � `r I � V ` � F. O L. � q C � M _L V ` C __ . �• ` O { C MR O C _ c_' yC0 �� � OC` =?O d ni � OC✓y •+ v L- yY - _ �� E r = c_n _ � dr =•_g G4 _ Vr Cr' ut! T G 5< r4 .°j' Ge � CNG_ _ _ � c<,• s C -"c C O •r.SC f � J G. ✓ Q ___ 4 C _ C � - ' V -! � I C �_ V• r N <. V_ � _ ` C V C✓� C r c _ f= C E C. O L = n✓ C � G ✓r C N C G .- .� O +. C_ L C t_ G O C � L � -ee• V __ < < L O O y u E � c� C= �` ul � u E i y � N C O <• � p _ u� i 11 R C E L c y CrC-J U oG V 4 r q L V q V v C� 4 T Q r p C •'d v '� C 2 L •n •i I O I II r n I U O'.> C V r 1 i •• Lj ° '� ° c- •• u N D V ..•4 V TC _ usu'°J P `q V O A L 1/JI V O N- P o � c\ . j i• L_ I `7 I GUC • � I Vn�- �v ❑ ) _1 G' p u I I 10 O p o O s L ✓ = Fj _ __ V U ` l r •� O r G O n _ C •' - - - - p y O 7 +7 y c U 9 p l ' � c� U�✓ - Y O �✓ ig 6 1. . 6 C V 6 q C O L o f h r.• �I N 'V O • w O� • I I i ! �! I! I E L c y CrC-J U oG V 4 r q L vni uL v C� 4 T Q r p C •'d v '� C 2 L •n pP 7 Vn �G•P Lj CC -O r 0 ..•4 V TC _ usu'°J P `q V O A 1/JI V O N- P ✓VT O� ✓C- i ✓ V O � 4 r8 D •+•Or 2 - >• S C P c e g o v _ _ S O L ` L O �•'c n v oc•° 4 J T y] r •^ O C ° •n G • n_ a M G o 0 E v O C O O q D V p 7 y V - r = G F0= M L G O G L O E "q- n C GoL S _ _ C GN 7 P ^C- C C � j W G]D V - � v -.tee ob O = p0 P °- v -✓ � L C _ - _ � O y .\7 c -moo 6 G V V 0 P q b P -117 n G °V.r•6 ✓ 4 u � M G � O G V y N q O C L G G 9 V u i c o - °. +•V cD Q) v ` V ` Q :I (Oi qo �I I P L C 4 U O ` q G ° C c T •r yl ce. - 4 C `I q GI� q > I V q_ >•� II1 O O G' OI �I ei ✓ O .n S N ✓ C � O � w r � I q L u C r � p i C 2 � Q V v O > 6 L L7 i A7 �i i1 v 0 i C O a C C c `1 i Cr u � i C G G r 111 1 V ` V u_q Vrr uri n i C'Cy� _ qV � r C V � C> V •n � 7 Q E c F _• P n ��_ _ � • _ n � _ c J � —_ a � \•o C � • v a i v — I _ cN r C V q ` r V .•' O r .Li. 0 V '� .n S I V V [' 4 C a ' �L.r _� t U ` C C' L V 9 Pr EL O l C 1 _ t • C � iCC yC= l T I M Cl _ T GC �� •C uL 7 .+ I C V C' ? V C f_. S C r Vr �. 4T E„ P C t raC CC G C.jO .n✓ vSUUC � �� ��G \j —� !.O W +fir L� � '� G E L.nV Vf O•r .C.� n .n r .n OrL NV O � .v i— Rf .pl a .]— N4 V'Oi tq N C= I VV Oy� V u0 OC S OI •'- � �?2 C G n 'e G �. S r L P u 4 � t I— r C J •n L c ' Liu <V 6� �V O� c 90y V_ U � Wr MV 3G tOJC • — ^`_ u O •v V1 `� `^ I O a C C c `1 i Cr u � i C G G r 111 1 V ` V u_q Vrr uri n i C'Cy� _ qV � r C V � C> V •n � 7 Q C V E r V ` V u_q Vrr uri n i C'Cy� _ qV � V � C> V •n � c _ V 1 _ t • C � iCC yC= l G_ M Cl T GC .O•. C J I CL � �. �` C' ? V C S C r Vr �. 4T E„ P C t raC CC G C.jO '� G E L.nV Vf O•r .C.� n .n r .n OrL NV O Rf .pl a C V E i L.1 V O E-M- 11 �I s C 'r Y F O p V n.a - 'z rr• o O Pr- � M u i E O r „ ^L L Y C la is -u I° v •Y•• E T `O n_ U r — O ^ u u 7 O • �V � P ! 1 G `d L d c > a ru 9 °c — _v I G G •'�7 � � I l9 q9 �J 4 •n n e•�ca �• p J V a C 'r Y F O p V n.a - 'z rr• o O Pr- � M u i E O r „ ^L L Y C la is -u I° v •Y•• E T `O n_ U r — O ^ u u 7 O • �V � P ! 1 , c > a ru 9 _ O — _v q9 �J 4 •n n — L �• 6 d r � '9u cur qi. �-�•:. _ r� �•^- o� ._ ra U•� r �.n rl e4 0= yC VV• u Orr y ^ C VC —C p--a �i _C pd 6r 6 O —9� C— 7'J Or y V'•G�N C � Q O — Iz — , E E U CITY OF RANCHO CUCA1TMONGA STAFF REPORT L984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Linda D. Daniels, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84 -31 - MORE AND STEELE - The development f a 12 unit apartment unit complex on 0.88 acres of lane in the Medium Residential District (8 -14 du /ac' located at 8570 Arrow Highway, on the north side of Arrow Highway between Baker Avenue and Vineyard Avenue - APN 207- 201 -12. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a precise site plan and building elevations and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Purpose: Development of a 12 unit apartment complex. C. Location: The northside o' Arrow Highway and wesc of Vineyard .. .•e7i nue D. Parcel Size: 0 -88 acres. E. Existing Zoning: Medium Residential (8 -14 du /ac). F. Existirq Land lase: Vacant. G. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant, Medium Residential (8 -14 du /ac). South - Single Family Residences; Medium Residential (8 -14 du /ac). East - Labor Camp, Medium Residential (b 14 du!ac). West - Single family residence, Medium Residential (8 -14 du /ac). H. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Medium Reside North - Medium Residential South - Medium Residential East - Medium Residential West - Medium Residential ntiai (4 -14 du /ac). (4 -14 du /ac). (4 -14 du /ac). (4 -14 du /ac). (4 -14 du /ar.). ITEM Q PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Environmental Assessment & DR 84 -31 - More & Steele Page 2 I. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant of any structures and vegetation is predominantly indigenous to weeds. There is a small cactus patch midway on the lot on the east side of the property. II. ANALYSIS: A- General: This project is located on Arrow Highway which is designated as a Special Boulevard in the General Plan- The applicant proposes the development of a twelve unit apartment complex on the site using the optional Development Ccde standards. The density of the project is at 13 -64 du /ac based on an 0.88 acre site. The applicant has complied with all of the optional development standards which include both public and private open space, setbacks, a solar energy ystem end outdoor recreational facilities. The subject site is located in a designated Medium Residential (8 -14 du /ac) neighborhood; however, there are quite a number of mixed residential land uses surrounding the project. There is an existing labor camp to the east and various single family residences to the west and south. B. 2t!41! Review Committee: The Design Review Committee has reviewer: the subject proposal and has recommended approval of the development plans and building elevations. The Design Review Corrofiittee has recommended changes to the building design, carport elevations, and the design of the open, space areas. Conditions which provide for solutions to these design changes have been included for the Commission's consideration. C- Technical Review Committee- The Technical Review COM14ittee has reviewed the development plans and has reco7niended approval of the project. The Committee is recommending that an easement for future ingress and egress be established along th3 east property line. This easement will allow for the future Possibility of a shared drive approach should the labor camp ever be redeveloped with a compatible Medium Residential project. The Technical Review Commitee felt that this easement was necessary due to the type of road that Arrow Highway will eventua'ly be and the concern for limiting the number of drive approaches fronting on to the road. D. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Studv has been comp ete, by the applicant. Staff has completed the environmental checklist and has found no significant adverse environmental impacts as a result cf this project. Staff would, therefore, recommend that the Co =ission issue a Negative Declaration for this project. U.-� PLANNING C014MISSIG STAFF REPORT Environmental Assesssent & OR 84 -31 - More & Stt -.ele Page 3 11 III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the Development Code and the General Plan. The project will not h- c trimental to adjacent properties or cause ;ignificanL environmental impacts< In addition the proposed use, site olan, and elevations, together with the recommended Conditions of Approval, are in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Development Code and City standards. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised for env'ronmental assessment in 7he Daily Report. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission issue a Negative Declaration and approve Development Review 84 -31 by adopting the att,ched Resolution and the appropriate Conditions of Approval. Respectfully submitted, Rick Gomez City Planner RG:LD:ns Attachmerts: Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit aibit Initial - Resolut U "A" - Location Map "B" - Site Plan "C" - Building Elevations "D" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Study, Part I ion of Approval with Conditions C2 -3 CITY OF RANCHO CucA moNc.k PLANNING DiviSIoN ITEM: TITLE= I SATE ► .gyp �-y a _ .1 5 ss Z = r � ;as < Y < ifi O W a�i C <Y oil rA-2 NORTH 1 11 FRONT ELEV. .., . SIDE ELEV. T SnCAL CITY OF RANCI -10 CI.CAV10\`GA PLANNING DIVIS'ONT SITE PLAN ._.. % G� NORTH ITE%I: DR 84 -31 TITLE. SI -M PLAN arOL ELFVATIDN✓ EXHIBIT= . etu au,.wnarpw` c. ter, e — all ' I \ w `YIRMR`rwYM�IIG V. � 1 I f �ui+nw� `iw"�YN /11ro�S 1 M'.4M 1 -�lR M.1LM1 � /1i1.M.�.1 �JLY Wp9O- 1 i dN�VO d.v'Y,nwl�rOwG /.I.4 °sp,fti `I I iii] r*,e+Ra.' wWrt, WG• u.e,- l+�y� CITY OF RA`CHO CUC:- 1j1Qt'(;:%, PLANNI':�, DIVISKiN /- ,cwn.•n..u....,'t�„ a n�,r' i • `r+.c�w u•o� .nn.....J I Qzivrs II p"'o lI �r atfif�ly® —� ;xs:., solm rrr —%i. OR 84 -31 T11 U: —L,::eWDLCAP6 PLAt4 EXHII3IT: VC" SG1LE= LL9 C� �ORTI-f �3 Z uo.nr•au SJ. . r �r �J aC 6 �a M1 r� 4 T r U LL9 C� �ORTI-f ll L....� uV �1 .rceus..r.... rrrcva�•r�- -711 I � I • .rr..x_ rr�c�.w �\ I _'Al .s _ may PRCwL.+a+6l6 S..if� � -9Rrie rLSOrX. � + \i _ rasa .Vr.rz•u� i.%Lr. OK.An - Vnq_�a 7. a. —�i.NA LY -W.}i Oa1G.. CITY OF RANCHO CUC.- NIOrC:A PLANNING DIVISION i 1 I 1 :"�• j1 ( 1 Ir �% � MYLIU•1 I.YILU'2M1 la /� V:ccr .rceus..r.... rrrcva�•r�- -711 I � I • .rr..x_ rr�c�.w �\ I _'Al .s _ may PRCwL.+a+6l6 S..if� � -9Rrie rLSOrX. � + \i _ rasa .Vr.rz•u� i.%Lr. OK.An - Vnq_�a 7. a. —�i.NA LY -W.}i Oa1G.. CITY OF RANCHO CUC.- NIOrC:A PLANNING DIVISION i iTr \1: ©R '34-31 T1TLr: L MOSCAFF, PLON C,` i,n33rr: 0-7 f 3 � 0 FII }g .1 W: VY r if-�1 +jr TL �GLIII �i :� WTI � o i IS i sJ V V NORTH 1 I ( 1 � MYLIU•1 I.YILU'2M1 la /� V:ccr l �'�'•.u.ouu.sa.Yw `aOCIW �4a.. Mlrr. W.J. iTr \1: ©R '34-31 T1TLr: L MOSCAFF, PLON C,` i,n33rr: 0-7 f 3 � 0 FII }g .1 W: VY r if-�1 +jr TL �GLIII �i :� WTI � o i IS i sJ V V NORTH CITY OF RAtiC O CUCAKONGA IN:TIAz STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATIO_Q SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects reauir_ng environmental review, this for^ must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the Project application is made. Upon receipt cf this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Coraittee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before tae public meeting at which time the Project is to be heard. The Connaittee will make one of three detterrinations: 1) The project will have ro signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will havr_ -a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Im-pact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report Should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: fir,-, ✓�la.�� A�n�� i�j�7„�,7p P-e CANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: —% /. %V Ain NAME, ADDRESS, i.,C ??ONE OF P RSON TO BE CONTACTED CO.�CEFUNING THIS PRi. JECT: LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) - Qo.4 . LIST OTHER PERT ?ITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FrEDERAL AGENCIES ;LND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: 1 -1 C ,::Ei E J PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT. ACREAGE CI' PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF E::ISZING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY; DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORM -AT'ON ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, 'Y CULTURAL, HISTORICA_L OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EkISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS)- Is t-he project part of a larger project, one of a _pries of cuMulative actions, which although "- ndividually small, nay as a whole have significant e.ivaroamental impact? a (:�_j Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPORTTU;T: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and an the attached exhibit d f s present the data and information requireor this initial evaluation_ to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Date�� 'ag Sigralt2a Title H.�n � I -3 c -1 o WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.) ? _ 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? 5. Remove any existing trees? How many_? 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, £lammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPORTTU;T: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and an the attached exhibit d f s present the data and information requireor this initial evaluation_ to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Date�� 'ag Sigralt2a Title H.�n � I -3 c -1 o RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF TIE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPhLN.T REVIEW N0. 84 -31 LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROI' :.IGHWAY AND WEST OF VINEYARD AVENUE IN THE MEDIUM RESID& TIAL DISTRICT 13 :iEREAS, on the "4;:h day -1 Aut - ;st, 1984, a complete application was filed by Kenneth More aic- William Stee .'e for review of the above- described project; and w9EREAS, on the 10th day 7f October, 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission Sield a ne=sting to consider the abe�we- described project. follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as SECTION 1: That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and 3.. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; - and 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on October 10, 1984. SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 84 -31 is approved subject to the following conditions and attached Standard Conditions: TANNING DIVISION: 1. The most northerly building and tot lot shall be moved to the east in order to create more open space around the tot lot area. There shall be a maximum of 25 feet and a minimum of 20 feet between the building and the east pro -.erty line. 2. The roof material shall be revised so that a concrete tile, that has a shake appearance, is used. Resolution No. Page 2 3. The design of the carport shall be revised so that the support column is framed in with either stucco or wood. The trim band proposed on the Carport roof shall be of wood. 4. Trim work shall be added to all front elevation windows on both buildings. 5. The private areas for the "orth building shall be extended, so that the private areas of all the apartments are similar in area. A rear access fence should be provided so that easy access can be gained to the open space to the north. 5. A minimum of one tree shall be provided in the private areas for the southerly 'building. 7. The rear yard private fences, and the carport trim work, shall be stained to match the building (Cly"npic Stain 707). ENGINEERING DIVISIO14: 1. Reduce the drive approach on Arrow Highway to 30 feet. 2. Provide an easement, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, so that the pruperty owner to the east can reconstruct the proposed 30 -foot drive approach upon redevelopment of the east property so that a mutual driveway approach is utilized for both properties. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy ecretary I. Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certifv that the foregoing Resolution, was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of October, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: U fJ 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.MONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 10, 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner ,F„ SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84 -06 - COCA COLA - A request to expand previously approved warehouse addition from 21,600 square feet to 31,200 square feet on 9.2 acres of land in the Industrial Park (Subarea 6) category, located at the northwest corner of 6th Street and Utica Avenue - APN 209- 411-16. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of site plan and elevations, issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Purpose: Development of a warehouse addition. C. Location: Northwest corner of 6th Street and Utica. D. Parcel Size: 9.10 acres. E. Existing Zoning: Industrial Park (Subarea 6). .- F. Existinq Land Use: Manufacturing /Warehouse buildings. G. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant; Industrial Park South - Vacant; Industrial Park East - Vacant; General Industrial West - Vacant; Industrial Park H. General Plan Desi nations: roject Si - Tndustria Park North - Industrial Park South - Industrial Park East - General Industrial /Rail Served West - Industrial Park ITEM R PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 84 -06 - Coca Cola October 10, 1984 Page 2 i. Site Characteristics: The easterly third of the project site is fully developed with warehouse /manufacturing, buildings, street improvements, parking areas, etc. The area proposed for the new addition is partially paved with the remaining portion vacant and covered with native grasses. The site slopes gently at approximately a 1:2% grade to the south. J. Applicable . °.�y rations: Industrial mark (S-,barea 6! category permits wholesale s *nraGo and disL ibution uses, with a parking ratio of one parking space per 1,000 square feet of floor area. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is requesting a modification to the addition approved by the Planning Commission on April 25, 1984. The revised site plan indicates approximately 9,000 square feet has been added to the previously approved warehouse, as shown in Exhibit. "C ". The applicant intends to relocate the existing drive approach on 6th Street westerly to align with the new truck loading aisle. B. Design Review Committee: The Committee recommends approval of the site plan and a evations subject to providing dense landscaping along the west side of the project site for screening of the truck loading areas and matching new building materials with existing warehouse building. Further, the Committee recommended that the applicant provide staff with alternative methods for gate entries at 6th Street and Utica Avenue that are compatible with the exposed aggregate screen walls. C. Environmental Assessment: Based upon the Initial Study, staff has found that no significant environmental impacts will occur as a result of this project. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the industrial Area -specific Plan and General Plan. The project will not be detrimental to adjacent prope ties or cause significant environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use and building and design, together with the recommended conditions, are in compliance with the industrial Area Specific Plan and City standards. CJ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 84 -06 - Coca Cola October 10, 1984 Page 3 IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of expansion and issuance of a Negative Declaration of the attached Resolution with Conditions. submitted, Rick city PI :DC:ns Attachments: Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Initial ® Resolut "A" - Location "B" - Approved "C" - Proposed "D" - Grading "E" - Approved "F" - Proposed Study, Part I ion of Approval —3 Map Site Plan Site Plan Plan Elevations Elevations the warehouse through adoption � � 1 f J,< ^a i app _ Ell C e� � :g couoWCOn� oyaua ` I i 90105uy 9211. AUHOWO'J 6uniioRmoleoon I '— �¢ I `s 1' 4 71 W. _i a N 1 1 C T� AAWP V&P - j Y e - lea - -lo k'5 �I 1� 'I I i I 1 7 l �I I yr 4 i r �i Z p J W � 1-- W � J C U W N J F W O e� 1 I I I k'5 �I 1� 'I I i I 1 7 l �I I yr 4 i r �i Z p J W � 1-- W � J C U W N J F W O e� 1 1 I jl�!il II ,1j V / /�_ ^...s../ I I � �``1 •Ili _ ..ate. ' •. � : • �. :I I .. I I •Ywo I.rov ryr• I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVOON R-& ITEM. i c7f ' 0o T.TLE: 'SIG EXHIBIT - -C, SCALE: NORTH 0 FL-77 �' 1 ld 1� I ^_ —_ice i {'� I w ._. G w eel.y .�•I �� I i I i L �! I I •Ywo I.rov ryr• I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVOON R-& ITEM. i c7f ' 0o T.TLE: 'SIG EXHIBIT - -C, SCALE: NORTH 0 I] IM {• t tie+ I „ II i w i � I I / FfY1 N ^ I�uip � b 11+ti t TM 0 L a! ♦..R.ry•tv0 I � 1 1 LL 1 6_ 1 w"„ I 1 � V i\OKTH ® CITY of ITEM: Trr,7 RANCHO CLCATVIONG-AL TITLE: PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT- / RmlFrl� Ou: wF ~WCIF ,;�_:o uouc�g e6uoweon� o4ouea sa!a6uy s7{ 10 IWeowoo 5u Moe clooJ c000 _ uo!t!PPr asnoyaiejA c� Q > u ti 0 i c� .i i u w u ,T 3 i-- S� �1 O > w v S 0 2 a1 O t= > w J w Z Z 0 _J ' O � 2 w s; > > o F w F ~ w Q � r � J W 1115W OT c El E 11 a•.n w� r.a.n.�iau wY Ou. uwNa.nu p.�� z O Q W IJ1J x 5 O m yl i z O H w m 44 uvje owowvora oyoney lu mtSuy eoq 10 /.UEOwoo d1933o8 wpo' -� -�--{ uol!!PDV ecnoyeioM i I i i I Z i j i 1 �I R tl 4 _ ii I a I II r� larr t F ' m z O M L > •_Ty � i J O l z z Iz o m I � f O Al 3 m 4 _ ii I a I II r� larr t F ' f CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $67.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this fore must be completed and submitted to the Develop_r..ent Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development R ,2,%-iew Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. T .: Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. Warehouse Additions PROJECT TITLE: Coca Ccla Bottling Company of Los Anqeles APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: (213) 746 Coca Cola Bottling Company of Los Angeles (Raul Ramirez NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: HOWARD PARSELL 4815 Main Street, Yorba Linda q2686 LOCAiTr)'1 OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) 10670 6th Street Parcel 2 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: Buildinq and Gradinc permits - Cito of R n ho ramonga I -1 iE E PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Addition to existing warehouse facilities. Bottled soda to be stored before delivery to retail outlets. No manu- facturing or bottlina will be done_ A,�CREP.GE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND T 1'.0POSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 9.1 acres total site ixiscinq building: 30,750 SF Proposed Addition: 2b.100 SF DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TR--rr) ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, -ISE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING 9TRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): Site is currently partially developed with buiidings, paving, fencinq and landscapinq. Immediate surroun ina area is currently agricultural and undeveloped. There are no cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Site slopes gently (I to 2Y) towards to south. Is the project of cumulative may as a whole No part of a larger project, one of a series actions, which although individually small, have significant environmental impact? 1-2 x - // C WILL THIS PROJECT; YES NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial chance in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan desi.anations? X 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? E. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, fla.- sables or explosives? Explanation of anv YES answers above: IMPORTANT: if the project involvQs t.b e construction of resice:_tia_ ,.nits, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certi:'y that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation man be made by the Development Review Committee. Date_ 3/7/84 Signature / Title L • ,t,r-1_eCpJ1 WX Co ro RESOLUTION NO. 84 -40A A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 84 -06 LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 6TH AND UTICA IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 7th day of March, 1984, a complete application was filed by Coca Cola Bottling Company for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 10th day of October, 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above - described project. follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission reselved as SECTION 1: That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditiors applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on October 10, 1984. SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 84 -06 is approved subject to the following conditions and attached Standard Conditions: 1. The perimeter screen wall shall be consistent with the existing screen wall materials. 2. The proposed warehouse additions shall match the existing structures in texture, treatment, and color. E 'e- 13 Resolution No. Page 2 3. Provide dense landscaping, including 15- gallon size trees, along the west side of the project site adjacent to the chat^ link- fence. 4. The existing landscaping theme shall be continued through the expansion of the parking area. 5. Alternative security screen gate designs shall be submitted to the Pianninq Division for review . 4 approval prior to issuance of building permits. The gates shall be compatible with the exposed aggregate screen walls and provide adequate screening. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1984 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Oennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST- Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City cf Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of October, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: , COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Ll 11 11 Ll r O i 0 0 z 6 c O `_ O c e 1. 1 I il H V 7 N 6 6 S O 4 O z q° 0 0 C i d V d Y O I� 6 W of ?I a 6 V r u 6 N aO r 6 O t V dv� :5VO O y qo d L t c � =L d O r � c O ` e i n 0 nyr d E � M � v _ = c i .. n� q�u 2 C C Yu =° ¢ � V r a O G_P C r 4 f C_' O V q M ° E J� 21 V pywy N^J •••_ ^ -r O — _ dI— _ w nc r >c+ 0 C q =c i N 5__ Cy^V r _ _ p Cyr G i n w O_ I t y L C L O O L f� q .�.. •' O P --L -C C w O N CV C_ r 5Z 5 Vrr C V n° S` C V r _ O L_ r E O n N O 2 nr _ L °QL dC.T. °20 - drdr_ r V y r C U 6 r q N r L_E rr_l a°ie ° V_d CrJ 'ETC NM L -OS On. 1' .JN O Ll r O i 0 0 z 6 c O `_ O c e 1. 1 I il H V 7 N 6 6 S O 4 O z q° 0 0 C i d V d Y O I� 6 W of ?I a 6 V r u 6 N aO r 6 O t V dv� :5VO O y qo d L t c � =L d O r � c O ` e i n 0 nyr d E � M � v _ = c i .. n� q�u 2 C C Yu =° ¢ � V r a O G_P C r 4 f C_' O V q M ° E J� 21 a c m a ar�°Ge ow .dr, 6 oL C O° E W 0 C q =c r _ _ p Cyr G i n w O_ I t y L C L O O L f� q .�.. •' O P --L -C C w O N CV C_ r 5Z 5 Vrr C a = C CV VqW� nEl_6 lJ.di. °pclM�u —r q Y CL� `J OPY O'er `T —NTC° O °Jrn OVVC UUi _.' V �. V G ` n— ..J F ✓q n C •J 6 r. n V O �> l ° � u= _ y ^ _ V° t{. � E = -�rca o= �uq� ^Na ec °`^,. -u•� qN °r° _ '° 9.°,. �LV °m>,c= °cgNr � = E .. p - -' `cr EE✓i' J -4 Ec= r 00 n- n L.. our o c q c w l NEM ECur — Ln ZCN °vr.oLCN . _N.' �c -_a4 .:^�: cc" °r= F°_.'Jr °.°. die -° =.°^ N ...o = •- r f� C _ 6 G � 6 .°. .r. M Y g i- C — LINq O N D^ N 4 N O_O}.d y S dur.N N�I r r ai Vin, i c YqM n� `v- N�� 2— `dY2 2 r q 2r iLNT� d N a —Nwn ° d% u 9; e` a T acv s V q. O <L -• ° LTV HVPOa qrq eG C9 6N =q d L .,. LT arC p 9 C coo. =cui �d y r V U T,-6 O 79 N v J W .°a g C C 0 L `� d N D V 2 0 9 -�•• J 6 O ` u FV °. � � � G - .V- c C• 4. - n c ° c L 4 T � c V_ E C _c - q C= F O- Z'- °• C J ` 6n_' q O CV C �Yt O P O_ ^nq O l� N N VO L -L� YL L P�VL p O C- O N V . O q _ N •� � L� O l 4_ C C r d 6• L ... -- L v0 r G Y-. Nir Pu _� ur•-n N q _ _ i V C GCO �y qO .' C ddP °N °f; N Ou4tn C V i q u4 VIr =V Pr V v d D Y J d ^L q qOO d_ 4V O]� dI •JO Y J< `tr VYF C'LVM V� u. C , •I • r JI �1 \� � i � I O• I � VI I /� V M <o ^• b u c m_ n b oD OC 0 4c ` C L •^� _ C _ �_ � i T C� r � e V O CGNrC qq�V �']•, e t N6 r yJ DJ JCL L. 6 � i y V r. � °• n• j N 6 C O C .d•6.O..V Vr V °C 'OE'uq�0 O d •. cb 4 _ o o.�.° .. N NT � �� .4.c J. C T O. N _J L • °� Y C c_ O .e° 1'�Y• V C !>. ^... C 4 •S a NO 7 O NnJ?` CG.� ¢ ZE`rbq O__ _ qu¢POC �T,.0 O V C G G 4 C L° � •V+ � 9 •' i V C O L P � u 0 Q z 6 P r _Y, J od ro c r y o. rb�= °°n� •CV O EE OL V ` ^c�du lJi LLB 6 •''c N.."o ^' d L q 6 T.> ..>. - C p N 9 d� ° L _O V .0 •.. � V Q d L r O N C N 4 L O 6 ^J C •n d Z-6 N n T .5 9 _ V q _ q n ' O aqL. b _ ¢y L� P��� CLAN Vr _C ^OS �LN r �r �J•j • N v_�M OO GI ^• 9 V C` O C q q j �n C 0 •J 2 p y ND p. V ror > acrq.. E ry.e ��q^ q^..a V.rp b L L..L• �.•_ N 2 =_ rJy J O 6•J Gr— r OGi' � oo CT C•'V ^q�_ E .CN .di�C� �� _o.� uCC °_ M adiv r u LJ L N' bq r roa L w rOri C >� J n„G YV O V 9 D. = V w g L V C G •�... O C N M O `N� q' _N N P•L..r vdi .0.. d O Q d O O C> L C V C.^. •] E C �.�.• q P� +/ C PPV .I''rrl`C N p C_ 5 a � L V a r =nNN O• q u• 4 N L rp�oude F r r d T r P 9-11 P A n C u V C` 6= N •. — Li C v 9 o C D N q O V V u r q O v e 0 C r O L 6�r J> A S T ` 9 r 2 <N6q ubNJ CjN� M a r cwr CT 6�+1�a1 sa C Op N b L_ q T� ••• C •i N N V C C d C~ 6 C S C fi ..0. O 6 9 R N p -o° L V O L b O V J 6e 4 y rD.• r-ND V r N+Nq S r r �tE— n O y= �q— «m O V LL M <o ^• b u c m_ n b oD OC 4c e t r P 3 d n L 6 � i y V r. � °• n• j N 6 C O C .d•6.O..V Vr V °C 'OE'uq�0 O d = 9i..lY 4 _Gu 00� NT tN O COON�b b�' O NO 7 O NnJ?` CG.� ¢ ZE`rbq O__ _ qu¢POC �T,.0 O V C G G 4 C L° � •V+ � 9 •' i V C O L P � u 0 P r _Y, rb�= °°n� EE OL ` ^c�du lJi LLB 6 •''c N.."o ° q 6 C d� ° L _O V .0 •.. � V Q d _G EST �V N 4 = C � 6 � N OAT n •�...0 r0�� �NOOr NCP fU.i VC aqL. i _ ¢y L� P��� CLAN Vr _C ^OS �LN r �r �J•j • N OO GI ^• 9 V C` O C q q j �n C 0 •J 2 p y D y V V V C 4.D 00 OGi' 4L C•'V ^q�_ _o.� uCC °_ M adiv t N w rOri i''4•• YV O .r qv 6r�`. O P O `N� _N OrJ O OE =T b`O � PPV .I''rrl`C , 41 a � L =nNN Lo rp�oude ° Niv� o r b n r� L Z r V i T� q ^+a'u 4 E U P •. — Li qc< — — U ^AMC c r -n r+ U°' j� E V Y 6�r 6 6C O �q C: <N6q ubNJ CjN� M a r cwr 60 6�+1�a1 sa 4 R N p ur _ ����J]` a "N� _ _— _mot _ L_ c . .� • _ D �``M I T M C Ol r .• T � �_ L_ � � V o n � J r \' �C _ VV..G VO 4N b_C �•Or < dC� V�. r 0 Q L J q✓ C ^ .�..... N C V > i v � ` V � ✓ ✓ r V U � c .dr• _ � � L � D _ '.J ° .o C v C ✓ y t" � O g G a � O` V N F' ° O Cr d` �� 9 Gu aaiG C•�•V_EV V �q dJ vn �= G �L pNp d� Fd c N ��✓ L V ✓ i d` .,T, T c�� C 6✓ O P g V� G ^ C d V > 7 S E� � •Or C U' 6 i L O d �G�V✓ di�•w6 = `U °L �� dC ��G�V6 p✓ 3d V � N ✓ r1_ l 6U q m Q `�4�� OCp ✓i n C y.` Oy ✓J VG: Pdp •�i•Y r d q q= n • E O .Nr C � i .V,. y �— y r M �L+c u uvd v ° `off • •^ °�_'`'£� ,,. �_vc •' oM =° N. r acv M� nJ .�c.N. ' _ C •� V C � ` N o f •^ C GC-I M r= d d C V � q O� � v L � L V 4 L v y r ^•� Pu �`o�c -•� _N W v cN D v— qc� qw cG �_� Tlr r,cTV Po NI 4'.VN iV' rj O ✓7.aN0 tN�EC N 7I 7q ^Pp �W PN PC�LN� P ,'��q ✓4L �S 6Crq 4 `I Ode �Ci yVd Ly T�V�NN d0V �sr!AJ i� N CI • • 1 , Y Yi O d �✓ P V N T y _ •I i .7 �iC r dL° d�Od O�q q yy C O o ` d 6 ✓c .O Er.�� Coq 1 v y V= O G ✓ O. I O WQ j y c ✓ 6 `T6 C r0 OS dr .U.• c i D= q S fG.. i j O ✓.... O Z = V O c O V F < yV V jO N Q^ •C 6 G TQ GO 4d O N S F3 ca tO�N yN VO C d v < few �N •'• uq< � � ., c.d.�V yGq< raq .vJC �E'ic G° o <i oo J `o � —"x': c ._°,� =.-,• .N ddW 6 n0 N.. VqG L LC, V UT�.q C6� F =✓s 6� 6✓ =l �E QJ d O ..6 � qV O O —� O`• C d V? � � �O.qi � O y S •�• P V` L O d p Q � W V� � V l g( q N N d q✓ ✓` r C ✓ S j .T. c C 0 2 V✓✓ D q VG D..•V FV O N _ � y ✓ _[ � q q i � C I CO `y dpNC tq DJ V `O nT. I nU <V —tGV N J < C .• ✓ •A .� q d G' ti I a0., 6 V 7� �� L N� •.' _ L r q T C� L < ✓ •ri• d C f _ r L V h � ^ ✓✓ OO ✓ C O L 2 O g O � FL I G O 1L T L NN G qd da • O gOin N✓�OV q•�O c O G < CqV W V PL P€ d0� O CdC <m VO OU✓ q f� n C V i d C• . r [n. N L� e L � 9 V V 4 ��.. G 6.°.• L � i I V� � l p � L.' W C= a Nfll C • < i dI =� N N f•� O N T >1 • �I I� 61 11 O L v G O L d r� W. d v I o f r a I n I V G n V N C» 6 :e Ni o-Lv C ` q E rTw d qy° s = w J m ` C O C J ^J — � O d C ` ✓ L Lv q C � _ f Pcr O O d cry i t C P f » C C O Fr L N CN 9 < ✓ G T L r � � N ✓ � qNi <+ w- P r i C 7 L V i ox L d _ N y r O ` M o`o veE _4 rc� L y y O »o✓ V v o N pndv> 6 9 9 O O LO✓ - O ✓ T wa L C _ wlG✓ � c �nVC- y Y 6 r W G P 2�Tf C C C L —odd L C C HVVCL y ` L V N C N c d o r Y J a_ r 6� C O r L O V L y n ay on 'ec o.l P ✓ J v w o M y C O T �oNTn'c Fia -e =� Y Grd CCCPjN �a 6 y y 0 ✓ O� O E O ✓ r r V C L r l r ' 9r d y> L d ° Lc a. ^Gr J C.P 60a r - 4 °tea _ 9 y C O lk9-i9 d � r V N L 6 0 C r E G L T v n e ` Y O O N � d r r L ti T » � n _ y — V N L »� G _J _ C P ��• _ O O y O O n 6'n v N & V d V > V C `e r� a < O O O d d d ` n i F d' ° a N �- oo� r 7 G 9 V r r ✓ AI N� by IA I v= �O •I r N QI uI O i rl oI V e' o u p » P I o y c _ L y e.✓i.0 O— O _ C _ 9 • O L C C 4` i a P O d �° a C 0 t° —22 . -• N b r 9 n io Ve z 9 J J 6L O G� iNrL fi s V- •.' E r ` Nc' LyC N q .&w N .L. d r .= T. G NV Ca QJ NT V� O C✓ I Cy0. � Yd � NPN V.°i. Ea. Na VfJ Vp�VL G G e _✓ __z cvvv cti 1 C.O.•6L6 6Vr aq <PL W S l 1°91N6 <L .°J� d • O _ I � N (^ a z o-Lv C ` q E rTw d qy° s = w J m ` C O C J ^J — � O d C ` ✓ L Lv q C � _ f Pcr O O d cry i t C P f » C C O Fr L N CN 9 < ✓ G T L r � � N ✓ � qNi <+ w- P r i C 7 L V i ox L d _ N y r O ` M o`o veE _4 rc� L y y O »o✓ V v o N pndv> 6 9 9 O O LO✓ - O ✓ T wa L C _ wlG✓ � c �nVC- y Y 6 r W G P 2�Tf C C C L —odd L C C HVVCL y ` L V N C N c d o r Y J a_ r 6� C O r L O V L y n ay on 'ec o.l P ✓ J v w o M y C O T �oNTn'c Fia -e =� Y Grd CCCPjN �a 6 y y 0 ✓ O� O E O ✓ r r V C L r l r ' 9r d y> L d ° Lc a. ^Gr J C.P 60a r - 4 °tea _ 9 y C O lk9-i9 L r O a C. O 9 P C v V d � r V N L 6 0 C r E G L T v n e ` Y O O N � d r r L O T d �L. L V _ C P _ O O V O O n 6'n v N & V d V > V C `e r� a < O O O d d d ` n i F ° a N �- oo� r t 9 V r r ✓ AI N� by IA I v= �O •I r N QI uI O i rl oI V e' L r O a C. O 9 P C v V e � V N w C G L v n e O N O T L ✓ V V n N V > V O O O L u a w ` G �- oo� r t 9 V r r ✓ IA I �O O n V e' o u p » P I o y c _ L r O a C. O 9 P C v V E v 0 ' C G r °_ � '�-" Y c c°•N ° 4�ri° u c a J �� cu I _ _ I i u N`L c` `v' -'\• _ - ^ —moo _ , 'o c_ AN I c;V l p o� ` �- V Z? c V V L C q r � Oy` du oV VC•N a I eC 9 r^ _� I — 4 N° V i u C O _VGI G 9 M = d G o o INr d SI Fri 6 pN 6 .�+ J t c I Zr ti.L.. I 6..• r 4wJ � C GI <— �I �1 •1 �� CI I I I i I I I I OI O ° w M V L_ °i— C wvr t j p r ry `• N"OYVP M l y °' V p N1J r_ O < Nr_VV C � i w C t; p N N at `rr L° E s O` N • T V 7 r 6 9 O up �" C u '••' N C C M Y � O W =� N q °' C q N `� � uVi �� � L O V � �� � Cd r L r0 G � ^� ANU wJ'•Vt N al r Yy dy °`Q .j Cu � pV Lr>. fVMC= VU^ rW M � '•i.c�N� =.° '6r � a =Es c`` —` � 9_ iii °c: �n •` 6 C U u �W ° V d �_7l u7 L C CW Q ` N u r •' V Y E O C R v Q 4 � Or Q '• �� V -�J E l t d >' N o ` V V` C V �� V C q _ rL 9 P • ^ T y u' O � J E V C�` n C �! V — C. P C' i O > 7 q9` 'O y<q� °rw cEr J.c.N.s 6N ZL— v- cr' 9 wT 'JC O —4r L4PGe w° V�p'=1' =�T ON`s Er �dJJT d VC — CAM NO O NNy per 4.J 6� WrrnV \4..1 3p IJ� C �- z0 E v 0 0 Y U U O C 11 E t of f N •p I� I � r c d c v r C f 9 4 r = � a N N r r M 4't t r C r_ r C y •. = r y � O C O N � O y d � � O 0.1 T N � Y E O V C C �... V N r Z2 p d,G at °a 4 i o.r J C d V d Y — u� n� V � f- N n p O 7 O V V t G N r 4 4 O O r rr O� Cv�a 0_li • r z 6 6 r -- t q 6r .� -J 7 y ct _ of f N •p I� I 6 � d O T_ a = L Eft d O IC ado IC r O �T _ N O O N li u N V p'r O O 1 O T s Z C L O I 1 �r � r c d c v .a u 4 r = � a N N i r M 4't t P 41 ` r V C O N � O y � O l 0.1 T N � Y E O — u� n� V � f- G ` r b V yl �O > 64 0_li • r z 6 6 r Q O N ^1 b s1 " 6 � d O T_ a = L Eft d O IC ado IC r O �T _ N O O N li u N V p'r O O 1 O T s Z C L O I 1 �r 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 10, 1984 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Tim Esc dle, Senior Planner SUBJECT: _1S1ZALETTI`5 POLKA PALACE - Potential General Plan and Development District Change on the property generally located generally southwest of Highland and Etiwanda Avenues. I. ABSTRACT: The purpose of this report is for the Planning Commission to respond to the City Council's request to consider a General Plan Land Use and Development District Amendment on the above described property from LM (Low Medium Residential, 4.8 du /ac), to a Neighborhood Convenience Commercial designation. II. BACKGROUND: The subject site is apprcximately .75 acres consisting of restaurant and dance hall. This commercial use existed prior to incorporation of the City and adoption of the General Plan and Development Code. By definition, it is a non - conforming use which exists in the Low Medium Residential density category (4 -8 du /ac). The surrounding property is Low Density Residential with the future Foothill Freeway located on the north side of Highland. The subject property is not in any proximity to any other commercial or other more intense land use activities. The Development Code provides that non - conforming uses can be maintained and operated provided the use is not abandoned for more than 180 days, or does not change to a conforming use. Further, the Development Code provides that non - conforming uses which are damaged, may be restored, as long as the damage does not exceed 50% of the value of the structure. Finally, the Development Code provides that with the approval of either the City Planner or the Planning Commission, requests can be considered for expansion or restoration of non - conforming uses or structures, when in substantial compliance with provisions of the Development Code. The Commission needs to examine the land use features and compatibility of what is an isolated land use designation for a commercial use. In the past, the City Planning Commission and the City Council, through the adoption of the General Plan, consideration of the Victoria Planned Community, and the adoption of the Development District Map, identified this area as residential due to the limited size of the parcel and isolated ITEM S PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF Cassaietti's Polka Palace October 10, 1954 Page 2 location to sustain any Commercial use. The General Plan and Development Code stated the smallest parcel for Neighborhood Commercial /Convenience Commercial is a minimum 2 acres. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation to the City Council that the subject site is not conducive for a Comnercial Designation due to its isolated site and size, and that subject use and building continue as non- conforming as defined in the Development Code and be governed by those regulations. Area Map Development E • zzs !7 S I n. M y n I oa el vICrDN14_ TV irpfl Np. Ijl'14C. V B. ff8 /1•y ee`, ew I >o I ^v QS 1 86 J >v t 0 `J 0f1 '�u)N- -c—_y7 Its a•J I�� V fI `— 11. 11z 8 t 113' } H^.3J 1w for pG 1� the NEI /4• SEC. 32 T. IN.. R.6 W. uo 1 Iw �. 14 ,� 1oz ,•' a ;J1cJ • b � 8 J � O ^� Q "Npfe7ws LGp> _ _ .433evor'3 Mop bow 2?7 po0e4f Son Semo,4lno Covnly NORTH CIT— YX Yx ITEM: RANCHO CJCAIVIO \GAG TITLE:. Area Map NIG PLANNI DIVISION EXHIBM "All SCAL. . S -3 0. • -- .��� F-- �upRNINf:�GLORy - --Y� Is 1. 1 ; sL, JS i I to � . lGC —• I 3 vICrDN14_ TV irpfl Np. Ijl'14C. V B. ff8 /1•y ee`, ew I >o I ^v QS 1 86 J >v t 0 `J 0f1 '�u)N- -c—_y7 Its a•J I�� V fI `— 11. 11z 8 t 113' } H^.3J 1w for pG 1� the NEI /4• SEC. 32 T. IN.. R.6 W. uo 1 Iw �. 14 ,� 1oz ,•' a ;J1cJ • b � 8 J � O ^� Q "Npfe7ws LGp> _ _ .433evor'3 Mop bow 2?7 po0e4f Son Semo,4lno Covnly NORTH CIT— YX Yx ITEM: RANCHO CJCAIVIO \GAG TITLE:. Area Map NIG PLANNI DIVISION EXHIBM "All SCAL. . S -3 VL Proposed Rte. 30 i " I HIGHLAND AVENUE t -1 Ja oc1 JJy. Q Oyu OJJ. L LM LM L LM viCTOAIA PALACE L LM LM VL 0 L VL uj L E7KaTTMG iX Q STATE FtaE SG�r'.wey�CL: L. NORTH Ll CITY OF ITG \1= 0 RANCHO CU&,\'IO)\GA TITLE- Develooment Distr`.cts Map PLNINN \G DIVISION EXHIBIT: "Bil SALE _--- El \J H v N r l c 0 O �ti o z o. ,D D A < Q] z0 cc SD v Z M m A 0 'lO IUD Ip iV C. jU I(XI !J IfJ iN i� L I b .O KZh Itr-1� C �I�II�!Ij�i -11 s ° ° -Zcl i 4th•5 � C II I 1 I ! i i I I �Dipi 1 ' 0 y Lil I 1 � D I v N r l c 0 O �ti o z o. ,D D A < Q] z0 cc SD v Z M m A 0