HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984/11/28 - Agenda Packetyn -.
'c-
CITY OF
RA\CF0 Ci;G \ \i0 \G
T` !iNG Co,'L% 1ISSIGN
v iz AGENDA
.977
WEDNESDAY NOVEAMR 28, 1984 7:00 p.m.
LIONS PARK COMMUNTfY CENTER
9161 BASE LINE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
ACT I 0 t_1 L Pledge of Allegiance
IL Roll Call
APPROVED 3 -1 -1
Commissioner Barker X
Commissioner Chi +iea -T-
Commissioner MCNiel=
III. Aimouncements
IV. Public Hearings
Commissioner Rempel X
Commissioner Stout 7•—
The following items are public hearings in which concerned
h?dividuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please
wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission
by stating your name and address. All such opinions shalt be
limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project.
A.
APPROVED 4 -0 -1 B.
AL
J.1.1..11 0- -if INVESTMENTS - The
development of a 43,992 square foof commercial shopping
center with retail shops, fast food restaurant and gasoline
service station/convenience market on 5.44 acres of land in
the Neighborhood Commercial District located on the
northeast corner of Archibald and Base Line - APN 202 -181-
27.
oY—ad - rsgitvIAKLAN - A revision to a previously
approved Conditional Use Permit to allow the development of
a caretaker's residence in conjunction with a mini- warehouse
facility on 11.03 acres of land in the General Industrial
? . category (Subarea 1), located on the west side of Vineyard,
between Arrow and 9th Street - APN 207- 262 -44.
APPROVED 4 -0 -1 C.
With added condition
clarifying that Amethyst
Street will be improved
prior to occupancy of
structure and condition
that buffering be provided .
along property line adjacent
to mobile home park.
CONDITIONAL USE PER1iIT 84 -36 - HUTCHISON - The
development of a second dwelling unit within a garage on
14,000 square feet of land in the Low Medium Residential
District, located at 6897 Amethyst - APN 202 - 121 -01.
APPROVED 4 -0 -1 D.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -21
- ALTA
LOMA
Staff also directed
CiiRISTIAN CHURCH - A request to
convert an
existing
to prepare a memo to
1,868 square foot single family residence
to an office for the
Co =ission outlining
Alta Loma Christian Church on .25 acres of land in
the Very
Church's compliance
Low Residential District, located at
the west
side of
with original CUP condi-
Sapphire, across from Orange -APN 1062- 332 -23.
tions of approval.
V. New
Business
E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOFIAENT
APPROVED 4-0-1 REVIEW 84-48 - PACIFIC SCENE - The development of an
with a- iendments to 80,000
square foot office/ warehouse multi- tenant industrial
driveway approach widths
driveway
Utica and 6th Street. park on 5.75 acres of land in the General Industrial category
(Subarea 11), generally located at the northeast corner of 6th
Street and Utica .Avenue - APN 209 - 411 -17.
VL Director's Reports
REPORT RECEIVED F. REVIEW OF UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING POLICY
i Commission provided
staff with VIL Public Comments
direction to pro-
ceed with amendments. This is the time and place for the general public to address the
Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not
already appecr on this agenda.
9:55 P.M. yam_ Adjournment
The Planning Commmsion has adopted Administrative Regulations
that set an 11 p.m. adjournment time. If items. go beyond that
time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission.
1977
`tFl
CITY OF
Rj3LNCHO A�CC'C vj \��'IO_ f GA N ( {TSS N
Z _AC;CN 'IA
WEDNESDAY NOVEMBER 28, 1984 7:00 p.m.
LIONS PARK COMMUNITY CENTER
9161 BASE LINE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
L Pledge of ARegi=ee
Commissioner Barker
Commissioner Chitiea
Conimissiorer McNiel-
IV. Public Hearings
Commissioner Rempel
Commissioner Stout
The following items are public hearings Ln which concerned
undividuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please
wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission
by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be
limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE
PER7dIT 84 -13 SYCAMORE INVESTMENTS - The
development of a 43,992 square toot commercial shopping
center with retail shops, fast food restaurant and gasoline
service stationlconvenience market on 5.44 acres cf land ir.
the Neighborhood Commercial District located on the
northeast corner of Archibald and Base Line - APN 202 -181-
27.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL A,%SP- RgM1iNT AW) [`0WnrrinNAT. IMP
C.
rnn:vua
0'*-Zf - UAMMAVIAN - A revision Lo a prevlousiy
approved Conditional Use Permit to allow the development of
a caretaker's residence in conjunction with a mina - warehouse
facility on 1L03 acres of land in the General Industrial
category (Subarea 1), located on the west side of Vireyard,
between Arrow and 9th Street - APN 207- 262 -44.
1.1J1VU111Vr1AL U5t YF.KMIT 54 -36 - HUTCHISON - The
development of a second dwelling unit witun a garage- on
14,000 square feet of land in the Low Medium Residential
District, located at 6897 Amethyst - APN 202 - 121 -01.
D. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -21 - ALTA LOMA
CHRISTIAN CHURCH - A rejuest to convert art existing
1,368 square moot single family xesvienc: to an office for the
Alta Loma: Christian Church on .25 acres of land in the Very
Low Residential District, located at the west side of
Sapphire, across from Orange - AP" 1062- 332 -23.
V. New Business
E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW 84-48 - PACIFIC SCENE - The development of an
80,600 square foot officefwarehouse multi - tenant industrial
park on 5.75 acres of 'and in the General Industrial category
(Subarea 11), generally located at the northeast corner of 6th
Street and Utica Avenue - AC N 209 - 411 -17.
r TTF —.
F. LEVIEW OF UTiL1TY UNDERGROUNDING POLICY
VIL Public Comments
This is the time and place for the general public to address the
Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not
already appear on this agenda.
VUL Adjournment
The Plarming Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations
that set an 11 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that
tune, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission.
I'I
Tf
SyUr S - cu.srl t1._n .c W.s PA;./
11
Ell
DATE:
T0:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA_tiZONGA
STAVE F REPORT
November 28, 1984
Chairman and Membe.c of the Planning Co- mission,
Rick Gomez: City Planner
Dan Coleman, Associate Planner
USE PERMIT
IRM
I�.wv�:cc 11tVraJI -Ir"IZI - Ine aeveIOpmenr of a 43,992
square feet commercial shopping center with retail shops,
fast food restaurant and gasoline service
station /convenience market on 5.44 acres of land in the
Neiahborhood Commercial District located on the northeast
corner of Archibald and Base Line - AFii 202 - 181 -27.
I. ABSTRACT: The Planning Commission, at its meeting of August 22,
9�4, denied a req -n!st for , Conditional Use Permit for the above
described project. The primary issues discussed by the Planning
Commission and the findiros for the project's denial were:
o Lack of pedestrian orientation /amenities;
o Strip commercial versus group of organized uses and
structures: and
o Lack of a strong, consistent architectural theme.
The City Council, on appeal of the Planning Commission denial of
the Conditional Use Permit request, reiterated the Commissicn's
concerns and directed the applicant to go back through the design
review process and revise the project to conform to City policies
and standards. The Desiga Review Committee reviewed revised plans
on November 1, 1984 and felt that the pedestrian plaza area and
intersection of Base Line and Archibald needed additional
treatment. Therefore, the Commission continued this item to
November 28, 1984 to allow the Design Review Committee to continue
working with the applicant to resolve these concerns, This report
presents a summary of the changes to the project and the
recommendations of the Design Review Committee.
ITEM A
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Conditional Use Permit 84 -13
Novembcr 28, 1484
Page 2
II. ANALYSIS:
11
A. General: The latest site plan, Exhibit "J ", has been revised
to include a plaza area between Buildings "A" and "B ", which
will include planters, seating areas, and an overhead trellis
structure. A texturized pedestrian walkway is proposed to
convenient pedestrian access from the north end Of t. ".e site t_o
Building "D ". A stronger pedestrian focal point has been
provided by utilizing the entire area between Buildings "A" and
"B ", as shown in Exhibit 1100.
The latest elevations depict a Mission architectural style.
The roof element has been strengthened and wrapped around the
building sides. Further, the new architectural concept has
been consistently applied to all buildings.
B. Design Review Committee: The Committee has worked with the
applicant to reserve the primary desion issues regarding
pedestrian orier.tation, site planning and architecture. In
terms of the site Flan, the Committee recommends approval
subject to expansion of the plaza to encompass the entire area
between Buildings "A" and "B" to provide a stronger pedestrian
focus and separate the pedestrian circulation and activity from
parking areas. Further, the Committee recommends that future
Buildings "D" and "E" be combined into a single building
footprint.
Architecturally, the Committee felt that the proposed Mission
style created a stronger, consistent architectural theme and
recommended approval. However, the Committee also recommends
that Building "B" (Del Taco) needs the following revisions to
be consistent with the other buildings:
1. l.rched colonade treatment on front ,levation,
2. Covered trellis structure on north and south sides
perpendicular to building, and
3. Replace red - orange ceramic tile Tiding with a more
subdued the color.
The Committee recommended that a decorative tiie treatment be
used as an accent throughout the project.
C. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been
completed by the applicant and is attached for your review.
Staff completed the Environmental Checklist, visited the site,
and reviewed the traffic study. Based capon this review, staff
has determined that the project will not have any significant
adverse environmental impacts.
A7-2—
11
L'
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Conditional Use Permit 84 -13
November 28, 1984
Page 3
III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the
Development Code and the General Plan. The proposed development
plan, together witi, the recommended Conditions of Approval, is in
compliance with all applicable City standards. In addition, the
project will not be detrimental or cause significant adverse
environmefital impacts.
IV. CORRESPONDENCEt This item has been advertised as a public hearing
in The Daily Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices .
were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the project site.
To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against
this project.
V. RECOMMENDATION: Design Review Committee recommends that the
Planning Commission approve this project through adoption of the
attached Resolution and Conditions of Approval and issue a Negative
Declaration.
submitted.
City Fanner
RG:DC:ns
Attachments: Exhibit
"A" -
Location
Map
Exhibit
"B" -
Site Utilization
Exhibit
"C" -
Radius Map
Exhibit
"D" -
Previous
Site Plan
Exhibit
"E"
- Previous
Landscape Plan
Exhibit
"F"
- Grading Plan
Exhibit
"C"
- Previous
Elevations -
Building
Exhibit
"H"
- Previous
Elevations -
Building
Exhibit
"I"
- Previous
Elevations -
Building
Exhibit
"J"
- Proposed
Site Plan
Exhibit
"K"
- Proposed
Landscape Plan
Exhibit
"L"
- rroposed
Elevations
- Building
Exhibit
"M"
- Proposed
Elevations
- Building
Exhibit
"N"
- Proposed
Elevations
- Building
Exhibit
00"
- Plaza Details
Initial
Stu,!y,
Part II
Original
R�_.solution
of
Denial
"An
"B"
"Cn
"An
"B"
"C"
Proposed F.esolution of Approval with Conditions
A -3
E
0
0
Q
NO
I
�11
c
:x
I
ti
I
CITY OF
RANCID CUCA.MONGA
PLANNING DIVISION
rr>rM: -
Tt i -E- ELI A►
EXHIBIT _ SCALE= o
i
E
r
.. JI
Jl.
~I�u77
1
Ito /IV
El
f 4v4' = j(df us ^; 314 L'S
t12tM1Ie, ra1iJS ^-! 2, ZaO cl,'s
S*
Ll�5-
NORTH
CI'T'Y OF
RANCHO CUCA-jvjojXGA TITLE: _
PLANi1II�TG DIVLSKA�1 t.XHIFIT:C_SCALE =-4-%_ZdM
E
AiTiI 067A
*ice TlrGO
t �
zi
It A
4' ` __41• 1 I� P
;1-- -t( 11'77
al ml
7 � ��- II' 11 i• L��V� r I I I• _
L ,
' I ��7,I -1T .[3• =q �-i I .L _. �Z - -r1J I � I
°a ! x� =�.�• --?', ^'III "' II, �,- ,� I I1 `IIILIII'I fpm `
�f I Io !
e= 1 9
LhilliI
—
o— „�— ;J4
gym.. <- .....,. �-..� <.......
A IMA ckfo
%moo-
CITY OF ITEM— �t0�2
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PL.ANMl� DRrNQN ExHiBIT- scALE:
�- 7
p
Mr"rrJYWJw Lt.
Zl
-- wl
1
jG
�i
C
—r
�J
GROUND COVER
TREES
..��•. \� \•
CM�JY. LI.1gWn M
�A
i z.
SHRUBS
y
L7
. t.N•
r -1
IMNMa•.J K,�
GROUND COVER
TREES
..��•. \� \•
CM�JY. LI.1gWn M
SHRUBS
. t.N•
IMNMa•.J K,�
GROUND COVER
v
r. i � �J,• -Sr� 197 IIII II 1 ��_
�J,
1
III' 'ljllTi Illli:llllllll
` Li C
OADC LIw[! ROJ�O� —� —'
_ 1
ti
,t
.O
ei IK.r.
b auJr
CITY OF [T'EM: ojp Ste- m?
RANCHO CUCANMO` EGA ,-�: iF yp ��m
n ANNiT s DIVIS CkN EXHIMT- SCALE: •�---
U
I]
..��•. \� \•
CM�JY. LI.1gWn M
v
r. i � �J,• -Sr� 197 IIII II 1 ��_
�J,
1
III' 'ljllTi Illli:llllllll
` Li C
OADC LIw[! ROJ�O� —� —'
_ 1
ti
,t
.O
ei IK.r.
b auJr
CITY OF [T'EM: ojp Ste- m?
RANCHO CUCANMO` EGA ,-�: iF yp ��m
n ANNiT s DIVIS CkN EXHIMT- SCALE: •�---
U
I]
�A
:1
I
M.
-Z
e,
V�
i
�i
,i:.
i
r=
i'i i
O�
�a
c
ss�
ED
q
_ - 4• 41 --
snecubc :o.C�
%�
rUTIM
crry OF mm: CAR 0 a s
PLUNININV3 DrVISL N E�iaE RT: - SCALE: •••—
II
I `oI
N
Z*
. 41
ra T s9mw AV
EXHIBM SCALE-
L I.
E
ri
N
Z*
. 41
ra T s9mw AV
EXHIBM SCALE-
L I.
E
0
E
0
U'mA0?
.e.a.
i
FRONT
BUSHY $so'DZc
1
IN
Le66HV
�rF ry..� fiAa
Iia�. C�r1f. 4. ✓YIY�1Q
1 ��.f/1•NA �/w�f VY� ��
.+N N• ate. �r AF.✓
Ellv RUGOA __ELEVATIOPM
`pG� %...Ei
noRrri
CITY OF
PLANNING DIVISION
rmN, l- ?PA.I 944- m
TTr ,E: • ft
EXHIBM SCALE- •�-
P -//
U
1 • G�A•s
SE. CLtvsjlo++ a
S70P n GO
f
- A
�m
-L•
CITE' OF
RANCHO C[�CAT'NIO \'GA
rrEM: _�� $ -
TITLE:
EXHIB;•T =_.X- SCALE: --
R
E
0
it
,�, �—,"} L�.� • —t : �_ z t, :�� of
��lN 3A'I lrp.w]11"
1`
• 1.
N y
c•
I jt
4Z
ed
si
Y
o +
.a
i
ili
a'
O•
e i
i
: •
e i
- -M I
m
w
w
w ,
y a �•�
i
9 flNll� V C'IV�IM)1tV
Hill 1-51- t 'y
4
3
< < a
V
0
r
t
of
x�
I
r
T
'6
9
r( �
i�
Z
3
'tl
O �
:t
t�
Q
Q
9s
c�
1?
0 i
i-
�e
r
u
� 3
0
t�
4
0
F- 71
Ll
S
11
.f
4
{
a :G
■ �r
-, MhES
q
{
•
� T r; .Ei 3
C? i .WN
: >
',
_
r
.. .
.. _ , .;;.
�'; ,,, ,.
V
�1
�..'F ' =.
3
♦.,
+ �.
i; .
�:.
i
31
cl
Li
i
a K, � 7�j
mm
I
a
IE
.ic
§
/
/
\
}
�
k
! !
. �
/ 5 �
l4 )%
y.�
-
-
• - � .�� &
-- y m>
Z• � «
£�
�i
P - ./og
�
eq
�\ �\
a ;
�
�
|
|
§j
§�§
< !
a ;
�
0
El
11
C C
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA:YONGA
PART II - INITIAL STUDY
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
DATE:_
" U
APPLICANT:
FILING DATE: LOG NUMBER: --le-
-e44-.
r
PROJECT LOCATT_ON: E�
V
I. ENVIRO\1,1ENTAL IIVACTS
(Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe' answers are required on attached
sheets).
1. Soils and Geology. Will the proposal have
significant results in:
a. Unstable ground cox,ditions or in changes in
geologic relaticnships?
b. Disruptiins, displacements, compaction or
burial of the soil?
c. Change in tot -)graphy or ground surf:ucc
c••ntour intervals?
d. Th^ destruction, covering or modification
or any unique geologic or phys -cal features?
e. Any potential increase in wind or water
erosion of soils, affecting either on or off
site conditcns?
f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition.?
g. Exposure of people or property to geologic
'-azards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud-
slides, ground °ailure, or similar hazards?
h. An increase in the rate of extraction and /or
use of any mineral resqurce?
Z. HYdrelogy. Will the proposal have significant
results in:
YES MAYBE NO
— L
a. Constant or periodic air ei_ssions from mobile
or indirect sources?
Stationary sources?
b. Dererioration of ambient air quality and /or
interference with the attainment of applicable
air quality standards? i
C. Alteration of local or regional climatic
conditions, affecting air movement, moisture
or temperature?
4. Biota
Flora. Will the proposal have significant results
in:
a. Change in the characteristics of species,
including diversity, distribi.iion, or number
of any species of plants?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare —
ur endangered.species of plants?
f
**.•
Page
YES MAYBE No
a.
Changes in currents, or the course of direction
Of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream
channels?
/
b•
Changes In absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the race and amount of surface water
runoff?
� —_ --
c.
Alterations to the course or flow of flood
waters?
d.
Change in the amount of surface :cater in any
body of water?
e.
DS.scharge into surface water-,, or any
alteration oZ surface water quality?
0
f.
Alteration of groundwater characteristics?
/
i
g.
Change it the quantity of groundwaters,
either through direct additions or with-
drawals, or through interference with an
aquifer?
Quality
Quantity?
/
h.
The reduction in the amount of water other-
wise zveilable for public water supplies?
L
i.
Exposure of people or property to water
related hazards such as flooding or seiches?
_
5. Air Quality. Will the proposal have significant
results in:
a. Constant or periodic air ei_ssions from mobile
or indirect sources?
Stationary sources?
b. Dererioration of ambient air quality and /or
interference with the attainment of applicable
air quality standards? i
C. Alteration of local or regional climatic
conditions, affecting air movement, moisture
or temperature?
4. Biota
Flora. Will the proposal have significant results
in:
a. Change in the characteristics of species,
including diversity, distribi.iion, or number
of any species of plants?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare —
ur endangered.species of plants?
L -J
r Page 3
YES MAYBE NO
c. introduction of new or disruptive species of
plants into an area?
d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural /
production?
Fauna. Will the proposal have significant results
in:
a. Change in the characteristics of species,
including diversity, distribution, or numbers
of any species of animals?
b. Reduction c' the n =bens of any unioue, rare
or endange:_d species of animals?
c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of
animals into an area, or result in a barrier
to the migration or movement of animals?
d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or /
wildlife habitat?
S. Povulation. Will the proposal have significant
results in:
a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri-
bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of
the human popu3ation of an area?
b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or
create a demand for additional housing? _
6. Socio- Economic Factors. Will the proposal have
significant results in:
a. Change in local or regional socio- economic
characteristics, including economic
commercial diversity, tax rate, and property
values?
b. Will project costs be equitably distributed
among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers,
tax payers or project users?
7. Land Use and Plannini Considerations. Will the
proposal have significant results in?
a. A substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area?
b. A conflict with any designations, objectives,
policies, or adopted plans of any governmental /
entities?
C. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of
existing cons=Ptive or nor. - consumptive
recreational opportunities? P _ n 3 r�
r
IL
YES MAYS-- NO
8. Tr,:nsnortation. Will the proposal have significant
results
Page 4
a.
Generation of substantial additional vehicular
movement?
/
b.
Effects on existing streets, or demand for
new street construction?
c.
Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
d.
Substantial impact upon existing transporta-
tion s3stems?
e.
Alterations to present patterns of circula-
tion or movement of people anal /or goods?
f.
Alterations to or effects on present and
potential water -borne: rail, mans transit or
air traffic?
/
g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
9. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have
significant results in:
a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological,
Paleontological, and /or historical resources?
3.0. Health. Safety and Nuisance Factors. Will the
proposal have significant results in:
a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazard?
b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards?
c. A risk of explo =ion or release of hazardous
substances in the event of an accident?
d. An increase in the number of individuals
or species of vector or pathenogenic
organises or the exposure of people to such
organises?
e. Increase in existing noise levels?
f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous
noise levels?
g. The creation of objectionable odors?
h. An increase in light or glare?
P-2*V
L
J
C Paze 5
YES u4TB: NO
40 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant
results in:
a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic
vista or view? /
b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive
site?
c. A conflict with the objective of designated
or potential scenic corridors?
1 ?. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal
have a significant need for new systems, or
alterations to the following:
a. Electric power?
b. Natural or packaged gas?
C. Communications systems?
d. Water supply?
e. Wastewater facilities?
/
f. Flood control structures?
/
g. Solid waste facilities?
h- °ire protection?
i. Police Trotection?
J. Schools?
k. Parks or other recreational facilities?
1. Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads and flood control facilities? L
m. Other governmental services? G
13. Energy and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal
have sign-ific.aut results in:
a. Use of substantial or excessive fue_ or energy?
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing /
sources of energy? —
c. An increase in the demand for development of
new sources cf energy? /
d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumption
of non - renewable forms of energy, when feasible
renewable sources of energy are available? /
t
r..
e. Substant ?al depletion of any nonrenewable or
scarce natural rescur_e?
1G: '_ierdatory Findin3s o£ Si ^ni£i^ance.
a. Does the project have the potential to degrade
the qual,.ty of the environczent, substantially
reduce the uabit:jt of fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife ;population to drop
beieta szlf sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plan, or animal coa=uunity, reduce
the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the =ajar periods of
California history or prebistory?
Does the projecz: have the potential to achieve
short -term, to the disadvantage of long -term,
environmental goals? (A short -term impact on the
er✓irowment is one which occurs in a relatively
brief, definitive period of time while long-
term impacts will eneure well into the future).
c. Dees the project have impacts which are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (Cumulatively considerable
=ears that the incremental effects of an
individual project are considerable when viewed
in connection with the effects of past projects,
and probable future projects).
d. Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
Page 6
YES MAYBE 140
l
X
1
Ii. DISCUSSION OF ENVIROMSN-IAL EVALUATION (i.e., of affirmative answers to
the above questions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures).
/ (� qCnW �Pl
-
g.G'
44-
ae� 7 -
e 5 �.�
l'• J
III, DETERMINATION
Sm the basis of this initial evaluation:
7---1 I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect
on the environment„ and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant
effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect
�—� in this case because the mitigation measures described or, . an
attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION WILL RE PREPARED.
ElI find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
envir:aent, and an ENVIRONMENT IMPACT PWPORT is required.
Date
11
s;:
Signature
Title
Page 7
l �-
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -83
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MO. CUP 84 -13 FOR A
SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
ARCHIBALD AND BASE LINE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL
DISTRICT
WHEREAS, on the 9th day of July, 1984, a complete application was
filed by Sycamore Investments for review of the above - described project; and
WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of August, 1984 the Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Commission held a public nearing to consider the above- described
project.
follows: NOW. THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as
SECTION 1: That the following findings cannot be met:
1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General
Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and
the purposes of the district in which the site is
located.
2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety, or welfare, or materially
injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity.
3. That the proposed use complies with each of the
applicable provisions of the Development Code.
SECTION 2: That Conditional Use Permit No. 84 -13 is denied based
upon the following facts:
1. The proposed site plan is inconsistent with the policies and
intent of the wltneral Plan regarding pedestrian /bicycle
orientation, and Development Code Section 17,10.030 FS(e)
requiring vehicular and pedestrian coordination.
2. The proposed site plan is inconsistent with Develcpmerit Code
Section 17.10.030 FS(b) that requires shopping centers to be
"planned as a group of organized uses and structures*.
3. The proposed architecture is inconsistent with the intent and
purpose of Development Code Section 17.10.060 C2(a) requiring a
recognizable design theme that is harmonious to surrounding
developments.
w
Resolution No. 84 -83
Page 2
4. The proposed site plan is inconsistent with the landscaping
policies of the General Plan and Development Code Section
17.10.040 C2 and 3 requiring a certain number and location of
trees within parking lots and against buildings.
5. The proposed site plan is inconsistent with Development Code
Section 17.12.040 C4 requiring provision of locking bicycle
facilities.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF AUGUST, 1984.
PLANNIWx-%RMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
s
ATTEST
0 'Ri k Goy ez,
I, Rickl Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 22nd day of August, 1984, by the fcllowing vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
Li
CHITIEA, BARKER,fiCHIEL, STOUT
REMPEL
NONE
A -29
F
�J
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 84 -13 FOR A SHOPPING
CENTER LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AND
BASE LINE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
WHEREAS, on the 9th day of July, 1984, a complete application was
filed by Sycamore Investments for review of the above - described project; and
WHEREAS, on the 28th day of November, 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described
project.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as
follows:
SECTION 1: That the following findings can he met:
1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General
Plan, the objectives of the Development Cote, and
the purposes of the district in which the site is
located.
2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety, or welfare, or materially
injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity.
3. That the proposed use complies with each of the
applicable provisions of the Deve`or ;vent Code.
SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the
environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on November 28, 1984.
SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 84 -13 is approved
subject to the following conditions:
PLANNING DIVISION
1. That approval of the future phase in the easterly
portion of the project is conceptual only and
specific site plan and architectural review is
required.
2. Future buildings "D" and "E" shall he combined into
a single building footprint and designed consistent
with the approved Mission architectural style.
i_ 3. Future building pads shall be temporarily seeded and
irrigated for aesthetics and erosion control.
fi — so
Resolution No.
Page 2
4. Provide teicurized pedestrian pathways across
circulation aisles to create an integrated
pedestrian circulation system. in addition,
sidewalk connections shall be provided to the public
sidewalks on Archibald and Base Line.
5. Provide licking bicycle facilities in a convenient
location. Details shall be inciuded in the
landscape plans to the satisfaction of the City
Planner.
6. Provide pedestrian connection near Building "B" to
the adjacent residential project. A lockable gate
may be permitted for security purposes if .raster
keyed for the adjacent residents in Tract 11797.
7. Pedestrian amenities shall be provided within the
plaza, including, but not limited to, outdoor eating
areas, canopy shade trees, raised planters and
benches, drinking fountain, and water element.
Details shall be included in the landscape plans to
the satisfaction of the City Planner.
8. Special landscaping treatment shall be provided at
the intersection including a raised planter and
annual color ground cover.
9. Provide decorative tile treatment as an
architectural accent throughout project and in place
of red - orange Del Taco ceramic tile. Samples of the
decorative tile and roof the shall be submitted to
and approved by the Planning Division prior to
issuance of building permits.
10. Building "B" shall be revised to include an arched
coionade treatment on the front (west) elevation and
covered trellis structures on the north and south
sides perpendicular to the building.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
1. Project shall be limited to a maximum of two (2)
drive approaches per street in locations to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
2. Cross slopes on circulation aisles shall be maximum
4 %, except where specific aisles do not have
adjacent parking.
3. Ribbon gutters across drive entrances are to be at
an absolute minimum and all drainage must exit the
site in standard under - sidewalk drains.
A -3/
Resolution No.
Page 3
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1984.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
E. David Barker, Vice Chairman
ATTEST:
Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary
I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 28th day of November, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
A -32
V
U
a
7
i
d
0
✓ i += = 0 4 4 T>
L. .nOC LU�r�J
q 4r U qu
y6iu O -.0 A j
^ N E a O V —OF 4
an
V O C y n y r C Y
^ q Y V G N W
L' L
qV J4 V �Ou
C PL q u q q C O
A�rN �V µ ••'n'O
•- ���aLO� VNgr
OQ �,�.�H�LO Vr•_e
p C V q >•OOUr
qn'`G rr '• -
•'•c
O V V W pd C O y— V O
_•Oi•L aLiV OJ`
N�
O
W
i N
C
H
2 �
V
V Q
o i
H H
z N
i
0
v
H O Ct
J
l
gcoA .D 9o�c_ No �. ua_ -.4 ea.✓
G• V q 9 O O V { A N A t- .� V
✓6 C6 �. rC9
c$a�c
O q o n L r. E _ O J ✓ L' L. U 9
6 q V✓_
S
-5:; L r U 6 P C r •• O W V L c G S >•
4 a°i = T a P L° E C_ b_` <Li C` E° F •Gn
G O °J
C qVY nVV r rN
° 2E I + >
u qy r`-j Ar q ✓n Cq
4 Q cV � + o i 5;'K � K aiC r T
✓
_ L p✓
T O N U N L_ V E V J✓ G '� O A
4 C j O q C '^ e° • V O C C L«
�CGGr C�� LO. (y9�N CJ >•� 6�_CDi J ^C�.
•� O O >^ O N F g G V« �^ 1 N l` � d L L L
�CV�6 �� q 4 q V G Z'_ O O 9 6 ✓ r
C C V N N C p C
IOUC
4 y O O= 4 4 q« C C ^ C
-+r O C D d✓ q u N ^ J V G C y A r° j q r
/Gj N r 4 M q _ V C N y N L° 4 O ✓__ « 4 V ' V> r l
CC VV _ _ _ T ✓ L q4
O O O a r 6 V 6 w_ 4 LLV 9 c O r 9 o
<�64
L C
4
N q N b
i
m
G Y- 4 q P✓ <. 0
r
4 r OC 9DL' 7 0
C C 4 A
V. r V ✓ > �� � q9�;
_Y ■ V✓
—0 C_ C «C
-2.2 C Y«
c
> 4 V � _ L
w = 9V 4V ° Uwe
u `✓
` YN_
q T L O✓ A Q C C 4 g G �= q
C_ She C VG ✓Ol °�Qr�.
° 2 C r p G N q � �Vj G O✓ N CL q
L
✓ � '°� s ��agDr qr
S 4NU P
V N 4 ✓
_L 4 L NG `��FP94 w
2 G C I-q 6_ Nq NA ON
N Y n = = L ✓_
Y zu 'c
F <V
A- 33
N,
N
OS -° C- PO�NOr C
d -dTYVV
o °r F�u ub
�r _
°..L�r °�
_
av
4dv
cuee
CND+
ra gd
a doh
\.
•NNa �`��G�'•diG
Y.4��rO
N NT +
wt4
_
-C..
�NNLI N+
V��� O_• •o dO
uNN CNN
La
VVVV w
V
80
+�+ Vr NV O
6a
Ocr =rN <
d•O•
G9
�
�y •°0
9 �
SO G
•
VLV 9S�r
Cn� O9 C•Y
VO ✓6 ••
V��
w o
S9+ NL
W
7
96G�NOF
d
_d`
615
Z
ap/N
rard d�bC `NLII
4r-
9r4•C
-r TJ
O�t yL•��
Cq9
+�
cL(•. -J u of n °
� � TTTi L G
.. i� a_' oN
°cp
i
o'
do
•�
VN `L' TJr
N =GC. •-" �
L 4 - >4 -C-
99
°L
d-
�TL I..YV 'a
� 4Y�° OVC
}p,0
V A„ Rd
L•
4
c M O
w� ^N V• --r•C 4r
L C- O •� V r•
« 9 _
N
lrV` ��LNq
-C�N> Ty S
Y Nq•/r ^ •q
V
• V
�.�OL _Vb
C,. rC
��•Lr•
9 d 6J
CV��
C� a N C C CO
l L r C q' [ q
N�
r � E'q° >•°
9 9 4
4
���
L
r
L
4 r n n. O.
L V �• S >�
N O
N
q 9 C q r V •- i N
=c_i>o
r rj 9 q O
ru_ i
C 9 0 d C d i a
°r
N
`sue
v� �
-nN p
�.�? _mac
T +aVi�V�r u•y
•.�
L Y cM •+
_d
4 _`U
�Lb9d NC
._
NN
GN Od
dr ur -N EVd
1° a. 'ya
dr
�a50a
r N w� -O
Y
^ +Or•�, q
MSL
4O
P y i V N Y r- r V•
� G r •pr• r d � i
^ N� i Y � 0
rn
uq • MO G: 9�rr�Q
4JN dra° P cr'
_
-O y
l
C C.�O•
Wtr- -�
LyY +=
qJ� drN OO
ro„ pi � �i�'�
�C.�VV
=�J� i�`�
O•a0.
�'
rN� L
i_`C
n�.nr
4 - S V 7
u�Nt
E v
••e� cEa`
V q
C •N• V~ N C
� 8 w •dr• r4n q G
_ N
U
l C Z
rq�WV •VO
_V•°.r
YAP °00 qrq
J Nq °N��
�Jq�
4L
P F r > r
d �_ C F.
P2) ` O C O N =
O r ••'f
- 4
C S
PD Z= t 6 r• l
°t
C
fi G
_ V V •9e r
Q u°iV V� N %Nw Ia Zw RO
� CO�JC�CI WC Er
dC r_PS �i G °_
�•V �w
dV
C• 6� N4 � 6 � j
G
_
�C �J °V (�•Ji•O
6 N.`3
^
V
v• Luc ^��
c v -�
a.L. -'.�.� d.,:r
rr4c
_o
•N"go'cO
r9
nC tl•°.•- 4'J S V Ll
C
t� �•�r `r
�- L. C
� •n d N V S^
L i� C
C
d.
6 •Lr• C�
d
n6N
O �
A� rnd NBC
-
V
°�tLO ur'C�
E «rC
O
i'O ^.O
aN�[�OYip+
4VC
+E
VJ>•
O
^l
CVONL
°y�O
^N
� .TrC
+� V
-_ G E
O 4 V
V
Q o O 4
V. y C g r i-
E M N
° o• p
iVa C�> u �'r
VNr
•Li•�ggN .n CC`
r�Clr9
-
-Nq �'
+>
W^
L P q q= C
= = - M O V
C -
W •tea
N o OE
Z.-
n_ rqV° Jar G'P
_
HV rnOa
VC CO °4
r/
4 q L l r N O O C
r4�
- l L C N
` y - •• P G
CON
- N
G
r ••
d
••• C G F
q" O O•
J 6 C
O
L _ O V l p
V p _
NE.. N
"w
r O d r-
V' L
C
s °a
� be o� �
yn �YCt �a-
- cG• >
n�'``N a'"•C o
=�°
i
pw• V >V J F N
.�� CL 't•��r
N_ OCV C'N p
6C9q-
O
uL JSa C °V �Nti
WOi- A�NO•a^q
Cibr °y
L J N L d O
C•'
C w`° C i C
TE�OOr 9 0 9 0
S•r•CN
.'•E>
i
9CLLr {s�
•
q 4NL >dP l°
C Cq V<CO•a
O
N N ODIC
lC
M N O
O V_
+:R
� q c �
_ Y C
Vb•rC
T =C �VJ� G.VV
NL°. L =y V'rnC.�
Cd C�i CCM
= ui.°1 �ornN -��
r «rgG.r =
i•_c_ va u
c c�
-
�b co
5
-`� >�a=
jL.
`�i ni E Vic• Nam
c.V
-oN
•N
VOy CO"n Eir
C�� ~6Y
N••CNO
S'
V Vn
C=
=c S «a VS?rG c
ip�.00c
V
a
b P r_
D O�
C q f•
G G C C� C > q
�� •
Y E y
- L =' q__= C
a
Vy
°rG'f
�L- ONC' LVC
TC6V NU6
G?V� O�>
Cr!
-w0. NO G- y NN1
-� OLr
rV 76V q•Li.•P�L
VOOi
-Ly
dSL
MbN �C°narEO
N
+ 9
V L L
V w
C+ V y W L
' ^L
•� v y P V O
O.••• m r •O � 6
ci
O c T
N d p c
C J+
O
t N C
4 V N N
v. c ..
N q r
c d G^
D' a pM
W 4 V N
b p
�aO ONO
N O N N v
— •-•rLV
6 N j N W y
El
f 00 i[9d�
E J A +OL�r
= d O c y O
o �. � O .9 Y•u
C V N
v L + c r
.D a,rr T or °r
L E t F u
J q
a °SAC D� iN'>^o
ry V
R l h? d -• S C V q
:. ^
ar N O V v
rLC N.r V_NrV
p J`— q•r O V N
•� �V --c OCO —1
< +�p4 6V WO +O.N
m T O
�y�Ty
a
v` .W.
Q�G O V l Y
7
]y O
— L
Am
W PA
V � _
T• � Y q a — O �
C N
L a T
WL�.V�. q G S Syr
r r a o i c
L ^^ c J N e c M=
r V A 6 M -• tK V � .O•
O i c s L u
a d
CGq +O b TJ r qAq
^^ .•'w s 9 dLi
9Nr. l 9 L b�T
r y W
— W r arc
d 0 C b y �• 9 u� w
j-
V� NT V O
'o r •y O
9 y 9 O p b p
V W L
A d 6
pia b�N�
O —
T u• v A Y •ca C
W N c b
W — L
V�r rTJ .•
N � c
C -6� d�•N�
•V N > A � C p.Li 0
g 6 V O ° N
L p•9E 9ci'e
c V +
c
qW c4 '
wcr `..T
Opp c-....
V N O V^ q
J E^ �.pac•°or
W
Cl)
i
G
0�
6
+ p
C— E
O D Y �+
D O �•�
C O
O�
C
N Y
°
p
b0.c
O.
L
Np^. c•
�—
N
_
Vry
`•
Ac
L
7}•
r °r.
ND
Oq
..O
4
—
C
G OO wW
iS
=
<
N
� a
aN rro
cc
•e
LS
•`
wY
�a 00
N - s._v...
— +�
°.r
+Cr
^
a0i
V
�NCd
+9
- -��
N
ANN
e
`
`�
•V•F
N� c
. wr
D.
—iaL
N.b.Y
`�°•�•<
fu.•o•
'byW
p
�^
a
��
c�
c' �^
L ewt"d..
N
v`u
=�
—
•`
r
.v
r yp 4
ps °.J.
c'.�cc� bd°
—°9 � L
up.
4 �
a:�
` .
_
_
..
R
r
g A r
'O
L •n V
.e
I
N O
y
O
>.�
c
j l
O
L
u
`
w�
E
S
V
O W
>
f N O N
9 L O A
V 2'
�
c O a
A
�✓ r
4.Or C O
C 'r' y
r^
O
^+V
— r
tC
4
'
0
OVOO
�
� L\ r •'
L'J'.:
Y.
.• > q
Oq
V
V
�_=
—
Dr
—N.4i•
tr��
an^
.n\
.
N.
T
CC
.• V
O c
L O r
O'
—AV
`6y4
```
O
C=
Gc
ws
"LV
r
Y
�'
-Y
i
b.Ne
O�
-•cam
V <V A`
�
NVG
—�+
KO
_
d 7...4
9Arp
�wc
—G O4
i.ri•L
E4w
=0
=ri
yyr
N`
�, T
<ON
tip,
<y
60
SON —+
QNpo
WV.Ji•O
O
pi
N —N AN
6Nr
SNO
HNL
y
`�
``l
f
�I
�I
• s+
I
�I�
�
I
�i
• �
W � -3S
w-
w —o cc La= � aw pN
oI E _e E _ J T _l y u °• F C a � w Om a P` C
V { V O a C L •+ W C O- _ 10 C O D d •G.
6 v yl � �` y • N p
•71 ^I r ?. V 9 G c =dd ._ w` i p v C `p r
� F V a' 0 O 4 r C O .� • a O A U 9 `O L C Ir
O��.�uD. =PL99 ri•r�N d �`. PM —P Oj
y •�. j Op _ r L�� l G q LL r C� S O w a ^ ��— C .Di S
W r` a r •_ y 9
O_b C•J G�L �� FA' p - E —� 4p Lt]GT lV
p orb 4 b y. LL
rI f V ^— _. G •�.. V i3 L �. {� = V. A d •Ve a C_ O y— O W
W O'99
p�u c
�. W« cZ d aP ace �9 eP ou �p�° iu
.7Z M j q �J O y. C� V p n_ n• 6 O
bN'
oz= n W o
� v. L vC 9 O L u.� C rI � •O D' ` C a.
_ OI �IWL L.a 4A lL VVI 6�q� U p p_ 97oM
1
aD�6i
OI p ti
�a
r J C q y e• .w >• +
lr« • HL TZ.!: 0 �•O
p 9 a a0i CVO' c rz IV OCV t
C - LL
_CC• T n q •,
G
� L C 9r Ow r 6GC N < y •^L
tt` r 4 a• �
—�-
^0
p C .n
u ✓OE IpVV .� � O p•_d rO
=p Clew ✓N O� V9q � d r dVt _ r
a Y 9 < «� � r 6 0 N. ali F O. L � V Y• q e a T y V
M •n O• q V L 6 •� ^ i V r i W C i
L C N•_ G r �':` rO Cv i c _PCOC VOa
a wP �o Aqy r_ t Q.+ Cyr ... c nco
f M .,
V N G L WE
.Fi•r «� T. —bail GC ":W Cv �dl y •', V >VY 091E
w� id wiG O 6i rd O. L<r _ f_V VO Cnz
LLS.w E� O' _w'� Va« 9 �aO L •Or .vi.�i 11 •2'L t. �(� Vii ..n6 io9oc «wc
r L r
lwP i� Vr. TOi i0 —'! VV•iv v VVie «��pyy
-J q_ tV wC PEt =9 O « V = • • `r lY a.
G Cf
p_ O dC Qm' VC Gm Ci 9
O y 4 k C V> a y L 1 L
V 4
` V � W C Y 6 d�� ti 9 � C 4� 6 I ' r b� y L •• P
\I I � I I iL1LN0 F�•�q
1
lt)
�•
G r
a
•N• O� P
O rj
J°� T
y V_po
d
co
qo
�
`••
Z•
L
Z L
6
FgT_
Y`Oj �O
c
L.¢�n
6
� Vn
rL o f
� �
•.? U`
v y
Y
P
O N
L.
L
�
4 4 •'.'
a G y O
N
L�
L, d .� -
' O
` O
'.J
O
I L
w
e •e n
t= c O Ca
` L ,^n O.
C ^>
r
L
jlo
t
O
r j —�
q
4 uL
y
NC
—bn0
—
E
V
G r.I, �
d b� C
9 c v
2 q . 6
2 L r
F y
••
y
-o
wii c
e= �a
°: •^mod
o.L
d �
_
-
�
o•
u.E O
�
I
oLL
-'
we�rc
•^ 'si
� se
4'N�$
Q°
-
_T�
O
'
•r O ^J
^ _
11
° U
O
�
At°i +O4
O °T Y
P° •'
—' °
cor
i
� E
Nr
c �a°i�
n
c ` La
`
L • -C:
OT
�
c
�
=u
t �_ PO
O y n
r�
Y N W N
L
i W
�
V O
_
L`
•-
6
a —
4 �
N
O
O
�
i
_ ` 9
n O .�
V` n � r
O
r 7 Y t
<f
u• P
cp N
C r
eP
O•r
�
IN VQ
6n I
yCw yL°
n
CYd
•C w <9
w
q�
QQL`W1
�
4°JI9rwC
CL
\v,
Oq
�
PLCO
a•CT
Or -
CV
9f.GC
••
=`C�
n4r
Or +��
�00
c00 w
�
�
°+
°��
°'P
°
.4. >��
Lam+
c ^ -¢,g
�
- _•,o
a
_c
i
c
a
qL-
tlrNr
•'9e�
-L�rL
,c
wY4�o
is
Po
_
L.n+�o
sae
s n`�
y9Lia
`M�
d..�m s'O
G
oc.v
a
r4o,•a
.•`
s+o4`�
a
P
.Y
w
O,u06
CC p
��T�C
•.•
r PO ^y0
i�
G
O L
L
Y u G
O L
L�
�
e
O
� � Y
°� q
T y =` L
O�
4 4 r
C
,C
Q
r
L
L
•t.•
d
L�
_
qy P
M l'O�
tl
42 rNCV
-G
C y
`
� O
L
N� �
L` T
� •J i �
- O
4
y
`
O
n L+
b P
L= y
y
N
L
=
r
c�
V y
L-
6 S L P
4arr
n •Ln
��
4
gnG9 •
`Vrq
L Crj
C�°r.~r
L
g+
4
—
4
96• E
�O
r i
C�rC
� e
�
e•'•
E •=
�•+
+'
+�
4
a :
•'
°
` i e �
...'^.
•• of y
.e
� ouL=
ai
N!
�
+LU•=.,
�.• °ou
`c�
:ooF °nom
Z 4
C L
O G 9
•'n O � r
P
d N C O 9
4
r
� n
s
c `oL
-
Ye
�o �
-
To
•.
rr
ec
it
u -mac
$L4 _
si
c
aec },
Ne ?�•
c•w -r:
ev+ °...
'�aa
Yr
N•d• .d•c
r
P ° L
Q L
O -J
�
� C P } O
•4+ � O.
9 0. O'
9 'C O �
G � + "n
'y
— `
++
TC
O tl
C .n O
C d
V L C �
c y L
y
•ti•
Y
V
L Y'
�'
<O
qOY
C
NVbN�
6S
OGEE -L
V.mGV
<OV VO P9
O
O 4
Y�
I
a
u
b
c
O
`st g u
n
v
�
r
l 3
lt)
al
U
m
i
�
V
m
L
O
Y G W
L
a
�
°
O
>
C
c
c
Y
� r
� C
e
�y
CC
=?�
TiL.rni
Vi
�
i
4V
V n s N
4qt
�(
O C
d
�V
tiq>V
9
N O
u
C
•Cn V V G�
N
°
v
A
Y1 J
V
- O
i C r
C_ 6 j14
Gi°Z
E
'•
W
`
C
C
O
S
V_
Q V
lV-J
V d C�
F 'e
q
i t r
C fir
r
Y
rr
u —
TV—
C
Ur
Ctr
q
q
G r
c $
.L. �.
L_qq✓
q
a
q�VC
`O
O
P
C
7Z
N
r
C'S!
yr
c�
V
tr a•e
—
9
L 9
V
q
�
a
C
dq— 2•
°
F
-
�Aa
�'u
V
q�
A'1
V
.n L✓
t aT
r V
A ` •O A
L
V
O (♦
� C
q
�
L_� C
i
7 i G
V
f.+
6V
Wes.
Wr NdY
L V
26
O
VO
O
Ll
^
■
Y
_
i V P
N
^.T
O
ty
t_r V Y
i
t
6wV
q
<
\_�.'{
y.
Y
\x•117
ri
I
N�
I
0
e L
u �
O O �
j V
r N N N N L
—
V • _ P
• V O V L
a L
z o Y u N V
sE `z 2"'
c 6
+ d L Z C p T +
PVT Or l .
cigo Y L` Nnw
T ,N VLi+ Oi'
—r yY iY `c Y
O t t G y O V q
6u O ✓ O 6
q > C V
V N O
L 4 7 6
o�N uL_ _
7 u q T C
v ,p
V�
i
�
L
O
Y G W
L
a
�
°
O
>
C
c
c
Y
� r
� C
e
�y
CC
=?�
TiL.rni
Vi
�
Cy
4V
k
°
v
A
Y1 J
C_ 6 j14
Gi°Z
E
'•
C
F 'e
Y
rr
u —
`a
m r
G r
c $
.L. �.
L_qq✓
q
a
q�VC
`O
P
C
r
0
e L
u �
O O �
j V
r N N N N L
—
V • _ P
• V O V L
a L
z o Y u N V
sE `z 2"'
c 6
+ d L Z C p T +
PVT Or l .
cigo Y L` Nnw
T ,N VLi+ Oi'
—r yY iY `c Y
O t t G y O V q
6u O ✓ O 6
q > C V
V N O
L 4 7 6
o�N uL_ _
7 u q T C
v ,p
V�
.N..�O✓
�
L
O
GW_
L .
>
Y
� C
e
�y
CC
=?�
TiL.rni
Vi
�
LAw
4V
Gi°Z
F 'e
`a
.L. �.
L_qq✓
q
.�
q�VC
�—
P
C
yr
c�
tr a•e
q
�
a
dq— 2•
°
F
-
�Aa
�'u
O (♦
� C
q
�
L_� C
i
7 i G
V
O
^
■
Y
_
i V P
N
t_r V Y
i
t
6wV
N6W 4—
<
y.
Y
MO��
ri
N�
M Yi 0'
P
3g �'
11
h
a I
v
qy
i u`'r V v
I
T C
L 1
d
V r
u
Y`V
6
v
O
y�
•�
{I
r
L V
O N
O N
y
pt.
V V
G
9 d
P
° L L
d—
.CiG
C V O
C-
i q
P d
acv
G
i d
N
V
d
1 a
n
I
�
I
h
i u`'r V v
I
T C
Or
pr
V r
u
Y`V
6
O
1 a
V
r
C
�' r9
'�
•�
�
0
7 V•`
_
`•
P V C
°
6
y
t t
C
`
N T
�
C
V
d
aONe
r`p`
WN
LG
V`
O—
V P
t
<I Oq
W
V
P
N
V
`
9
6
<OV
G
I
r6
OOa
O>
�~
yE
G•V
a
r._.r
G��
b
`
Oy
S
G
L
q
G
d> C
W
Pv
L
= u
y J
9
N
m
q
=
ru7ir
V
0
1'
`
O—
V
6
Gr
VOq
G
V
rV
M-
NNy
—^_•
—�
V
V
w9
—_Y
tj
d
�
V
Y
r G
t C
y
i
N
11
11
Cl
CITY" OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 28, 1984
TO: Chai..,a-i and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY: Dino Putrino, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: REVISION - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT 84 -27 - BARMAKIAN - A revision to a previously
approved Conditional Use Permit to allow the development
of a caretaker's residence in conjunction with a mini -
warehouse facility on 11.03 acres of land in the General
Industrial category (Subarea 1), located on the west side
of Vineyard, between Arrow and 9zh Street - APN 207 -262-
44.
I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Requested: Development of a caretakers residence
B. Purpose: Provide 24 hour security
C. Location: West side of Vineyard between Arrcw and 9th Street
D. Parcel Size: 11.03 acres (480,467 square feet)
E. Existing Zoning: Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 1)
F. Existing Land Use: Lemon grove
G. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
North - Condominiums; Medium Residential (8 -14 du /ac)
South - Industrial; Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 1)
East - Industrial; Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 2)
West - Cucamonga Creek; Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 1)
H. General Pldn Designations:
Project Site - General Industrial
Nort'. - Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac)
South - General Industrial
East - General Industrial /Rail Served
West - General Industrial
ITEM B
?LAN41NG COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 84 -27 - Barmakian
!- ovember 28, 1984
Page 2
E
I. Site Characteristics: Project site slopes to the southwest at
approximately a 2 grade. The site consists of an existing
lemon grove with a eucalyptus windrow along the south side of
Arrow.
J- APR7icable P,eoulations- The Industrial Specific Plan permits a
caretaker's residence in conjunction with a mini- warehouse
storage facility within a General Industrial District subject to
a Conditional Use Permit.
II. ANALYSIS:
A. Back round: On September 25, 1384, the Planning Commission
conditions ly approved Conditional Use Permit CUP 84 -27 for the
total development of five (5) multi - tenant industrial buildings,
mini- warehouse facility, and a gas station at the subject site
location.
The applicant intended to propose the use of a caretaker's
residence in conjunction with the mini - warehouse storage
facility, but failed to include this request as a part of the
Previous proposa?; taus, the subject CUP revision reflects the
applicants initial intention.
B. General: The applicant proposes to increase the size 0 an
approved building (originally intended to be a caretakers unit,
see attached plan) from 20' by 30' to 33' by 40' to be utilized
as a caretakers residence. The proposed request meets the
mininILM / maximum standards of the Development Code. The
caretaker unit and surrounding area should provide for
additional architectural and landscaping treatment due to the
nature of the proposed use and its public exposure.
C. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been
completed by the app scant. Staff has completed Part II of the
Initial Study and found no significant adverse environmental
impacts related to the establishment of the proposed caretaker
use.
III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the Industrial
Area Specific Plan and General Plzn. In addition, the proposed
site and building designs, together with the recommended
c-�„�itiors, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or'
we fare.
u
�r�
E
LI
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 84 -27 - 8armakian
November 28, 1984
Page 3
IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing
in The Daily Report newspaper. The property was posted and notices
were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the project site.
To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against
this project.
V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
approve Conditional Use Permit No. 84 -27 through adoption of the
attached Resolution with conditions.
Respectfully submitted.
City Planner
RG:DP:cv
Attachments: 'xhibit
",;'
- Location Map
Exhibit;
"8"
- Site Utilization
Exhibit
"C"
- Site Plan
Exhibit
"D"
- Elevations
Resolution
LI
s:
4 U
E
NORTH
CITY OF IrB1: U J7E! 0,� z 0
RANCHO CUCA1'IO\GA -nTu: L. o c A. Tl oA m isrP
PLANNI\G DINTSON EXHIMT: w Sc:Au-
.L3-/7'
E
I]
• t
Ir
'
l �--� J (g -14 � el: °~lw�
Tr /I7F'f-
2 ARROW
STREET)
C7eu era -
2 �
w
Oi F
Z•�YVL I< C"- 2M
.z.la
ARROW
TT�'7`TTo
%J
J
v!
'w•c J
t
iz
(yIJA t'
— UU
%Q Served
1
l 1! \
5�,ba►ea Z i
`.J
741" *P
.
NORTH
CITY OF 1TE \1 -- wP OWZ7
RANCHO CUCA1TMONGA rrrL J:: �1i� ��'+7 Ldp Ai
PLAMI \G Dl'krlSnN EXHIBIT: 13 _ SCAU -- s
S •
_. .�
,.
.. ,.
..
. -
..
�
'_ �
�
_ ,:
i
� ,..
_
1
!
Yr'
t.
11
Ll
0
RESOLUTION NO.
: RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 84 -27 FOR THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF A CARETAKER RESIDENCE LOCATED ON THE
WEST SIDE OF VINEYARD BETWEEN ARROW AND NINTH STREET IN
THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN (SUBAREA 1) DISTRICT
WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of October, 1984, a complete application was
filed by Pfister for review of the above- described project; and
WHEREAS, on the 28th day of November, 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described
project.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancit% Cucamonga Planning Commission resoled as
follows:
SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met:
1. That the proposed use
Plan, the objectives
the purposes of the
located.
is in accord with the General
of the Development Code, and
district in which the site is
2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not he detrimental to the
public health, safety, or welfare, or mdteriall
injurious to properties or improv`ments in the
vicinity.
3. That the proposed use complies with each of the
applicable provisions of the Development Code.
SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the
environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on November 28, 1984.
SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 84 -27 is approved
subject to the following conditions:
1. Approval of the Conditional Use Permit shall be
subject to prior approval of the architectural and
landscape plans by the Design Review Committee.
2. Floor plans of the building shall be submitted to
the Fire District for review prior to occupancy.
,f�- b
3. The applicant shall c.ntact the Building and Safety
Division and Engineering Division regarding the
submittal of appropriate plans and obtaining
necessary permits prior to operation of use.
4. All of the above Conditions of Approval shall be
completed prior to occupancy.
S. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the
Planning Commission, if appr,ved use has not
commenced within twelve (12) months from the dace of
approval, per Conditions of Approval.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1984.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
E. David Barker, Vice- Chairman
ATTEST:
Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary
I. Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commissior, of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly - ntroduced, passed, and adop °ed by tha Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 28th day of November, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
—7
2
11
E
CITY OT' RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 28, 1984
T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY: John Meyer, Assistant. Planner
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -36 - HUTCHINSON - Development of
a second dwelling unit within a garage on 14,000 square
feet of land in the Low Medium Residential District
located at 6897 Amethyst APN 202- 121 -01.
I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Reauested: Approval of Conditional Use Permit
B. Purpose: Second dwelling unit
C. Location: 6897 Amethyst
D. Parcel Size: 14,000 square feet
E. Existing Zoning: Low Medium Residential
F. Existing Land Use: Single Family Residence
G. Surrounding Land Use and Zonin
North
- Vacant
Low Medium
-8 du /ac)
South
- Vacant
Low Medium (4 -8 du /ac)
East
- Mobile
Home Park (Low Medium du /ac)
West
- Vacant
Lout 12 -4 du /ac)
H. General Plan i
ro jj emote
North - Low
South - Low
East - Low
West - Low
3esignations:
- Low Medium Residentia' (4 -8 du /ac)
Medium (4 -8 du /ac)
Medium (4 -8 du /ac)
Medium (4 -8 du /ac)
(2 -4 du /ac)
I. Site Characteristics: The subject property is a rectangular
shaped lot with an 80' frontage and 175' depth.
J. Applicable Regulations: Second dwelling units are permitted
subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit and the
following criteria.
ITEM C
November 28, 1984
Page 2
1. The unit may be constructed as an accessory building
or attached to the primary residence on a parcel in
a single family residential district.
2. Tha unit is not for sale, bu�: for rental purposes
only or use by a member of the immediate family.
3. The lot contains an existing single family detached
residence, and does not contain a guest house.
4. The unit does not exceed 540 square feet.
5. The unit shall have a separate entrance from the
main entrance.
6. The unit shall provide parking and access per
Chapter 17.12, except temporary removable units
shall provide one off - street parking space.
7. The unit construction shall conform to the site
development criteria applicable to accessory
buildings or additions to main residence in the base
district in which the unit is located.
8. The use of temporary /removable structures for a
second dwelling unit shall be linited to the sole
occupancy of one or two adult persons who are 60
yuears of age Or over and related to the occupants
of primary residence by blood, mcrriage, or
adoption. Further, said structure shall be
restricted to tho area at the rear of the primary
residence and adequately screened from public Yiew
from the street.
9. The unit may re;uire Design Review, ,pursuant to
Section 17.06.010 -E, as determined by the City
Planner.
10. The applicant shall submit to the Building and
Safety Division written certification from the
affected water and sew. district that adequate
water and sewer facilities are or will be available
to serve the proposed unit. For units usil,, septic
facilities allowable by the Santa Ana Regional
Quality Controi Board and the City, written
certification of acceptability including all
supporting information shall be submitted.
� -2
E
v
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 84 -36 - Hutchinson
November 28, 1934
Page 3
II. ANALYSIS
A. General: The applicant is proposing the construction
'R -a second dwelling unit to the rear of his
property. The unit wou'd consist of 637 square feet of
livino_ area and 2043 square feet of garage area. The
unit is designed to accomodate guests and to provide
Mr. Hutchinson with additional work and storage area.
The proposed second dwelling unit meets the
requirements of a Conditional Use Permit.
8. Environmental Assessment: The proposed project has
been determined to be a categorical exemption (CEQA
Guidelines Section 15301, Class 1) in which it is not
an addition and will not have a significant affect on
the environment and which shall, therefore, be exempt
from the provisions of CLQA.
III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The proposed project is consistent
with the Development Code and General Pion. The prcposed
use, together with the recommended conditions of approval,
will not be detrimental to the public heal`h or :materially
injurious to properties in the vicinity.
IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public
hearing in The Daily Report newspaper, the property posted,
and notices were sent to property owners within 300 feet of
the project site. To date, no corresponde. has been
received either for or against this project.
V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning
Commission approve Conditional Use Permit 84 -36 thrcugh
adoption of the attached Resolution with Conditions.
spect by submitted,
Ri k z
City Planner
RG:ns
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Existing Land Use
Exhibit "B" - Site Plan
Resolution
C -3
1
166,
YptcmT'
CL-)
1
C
" Cl
v
SUZZECT
to
PROPERTY
66
W VACANT t
Lij
(tN.
N s Fbc 2 v
73' o
CITE' OF
RANCHO C,'C -kNIO GA
PL.A:INI \G DIVEIGN
C �
NORTH
TCL�1= CUP 84
TITLE= &
E \i'iiMT ---A _SCALE-
e
E
WE: taanl
I � 1
J —'___• irs __ i
CLK. 7s'Gi..., - ^_. _.___ —• �T —�� ^
RL 4f1 R i
04RAC lcaR�iL •( \ I 4�E:L SYLF9 � .L' � �
f�
-ALL 4
1 VMPafAR.
�A
{1kL.6YPAt R.nKNai i- \
1.
1 i NJU'aG
i
CI fY OF
RANCHO CUCNNMONGA
PLcNTNUING DINISM
0
1 �
a
ii 1IC
ai 3 M[ i
✓ V
NORTH
rmxl: CUP EA-fig
7iTI.E= _- si T PL [
E?,H1Brr - SCALE-
0 -S
i
i
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 84 -36 FOR A SECOND
DWELLING UNIT LOCATED 6897 AMETHYST IN 1HE LOW MEDIUM
DISTRICT
WHEREAS, on V 29th day of October, 1984, a complete application was
I
iled by Mr. Doug Hutc:_inson for review of the above- described project; and
WHEREAS, on the 28th day of Nnvember, 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described
project.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as
follows:
SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met:
�. That the proposed use is in accord with the General
Pim , the objectives of the Development Code, and
the purpc.es of the district in which the site is
located,
2. That the proposes use, tog- }her with the cor•itIons
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the
pub is hezlth, safety, or welfare, or materially
irj,3rious to properties or improvementr- in the
°irinity.
3. 'list the proposed use complies with each of the
applicable provisions of the Development Code.
SECTION 2: Conditional Use Permit No. 84 -36 has been determined to
h� a categorical exwrptior under CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Class 1.
SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 84 -36 is hereby
approved.
APPROVE? AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1984.
PLANNING COMMISSION CF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
E. David Barker, Vice Chairman
ATTEST:
Rink Gomez, Deputy Secretary
C ' C�
Resolution No.
Page 2
I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission cf the City of
R;;ncho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Cormnission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 28th day of November, 1984, by the follow ;na vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIGNERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
E
0
CITY 0:- RA1NCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
U
DATE: November 14, 1984
TO: Chairman and Members of the Plann-:no Commission
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY: Dino Putrino, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 84 -21 - ALTA LOMA CHRISTIAN
CHURCH - A request to convert an existing 1,868 square
foot single family residerce into an office for the Alta
Loma Christian Church on ?a' acres of land in the Very Low
Residential District, lccated at the west side of Sapphire
Street, across from Oranqe Street - APN 1062- 332 -23.
L
I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Requested: Convert single family residence into a
church office.
B. Purpose: Provide administrative office facilities for Alta
Loma Christi- Church.
C. Location: 6390 Sapphire
D. Parcel Size: .25 acres (1O,S90 sq. ft.)
E. Existing Zoning: Very Low Residential
F. Existing Land Use: Single Family Residential
G. Surroundin Land Use and Zoning:
orth - r,stitutio 1 church Very Low Residential
South - Single Family Residential, Low Residential
East - Single Family Residential, Low Residential
West - Institutional (church), Very Low Residential
H. General Plan
r-je3� ct Sate
North - Low
South - Low
East - Low
West - Low
)esignations:
Low Residential
Residential (2 -4
Residential (2 -4
Residential (2 -4
Residential (2 -4
(2 -4 du /ac)
du /ac)
du /ac)
du /ac)
du /ac)
ITEM D
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 34 -21 - Alta Loma Christian Church
November 14, 1984
Pag3 2
11
I. S.,e Characteristics: The subject property is a rectangular
shaped lot. ini> property is basically surrounded by the
adjacent church property.
J. Applicable Regulations: The Development Code permits church
office facilities within the Very Low Residential district
subject to a Conditional Use Permit. In eddition, no structure
originally designed as a residence shall be used for an office
use unless the b::ilding and site are improved to meet all code
requirements for an office development.
II. ANALYSIS:
A. Background: On October 10, 1984, the Planning Coma ;ss;en
continued Conditional Use Permit 84 -21 to give the applicant
ample time to revise plans indicating the relationship between
the proposed use and the Master Plan of the Alta Loma Christian
Church_
On November 14, 1984 a Master Plan of the Alta Loma Christian
Church, incorporating the conversion of the subject single
family residence into a church office, was presented to the
Commission_ The Planning Commission continued Conditional Use
Permit No. 84 -21 and instructed staff to draft a resolution for
approval consideration..
S. General: The attached resolution reflects the approval of
Conditional Use Permit No. 84 -21 with conditions of approval.
These conditions address the following:
1. Conditional Use Permit Time Limit
Hou.•s of Operation Restrictions
:s. Signage Requirements
4. Occupancy Limitation
5. Landscaping
6. Use Limitations
7. Lighting Impacts
8. Building Code Requirements
9. Grading Requirements
C. Environmental Assesment: The proposed project has been
determined to be categorically exempt from the provisions of
the California Environmental Quality Act (Section 15301, Class
1) in which the conversion of a single family to an office use
will not have a significant environmental impact.
r..
L .;
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF R PORT
CUF 84 -21 - Alta Lama Chrir':ian Church
November 14, 1984
Page 3
I;::. RECOMMENDATION: Based upon previous Planning Commission
direction, it is rec mmended that the Commission review the
attached resolution to determi.._ the project consistency with
the General Plan. Should the Commission support the findings
and zonditions of apyroval, adoption of the attached
Resolution would be appropriate.
A pect`', submitted,
2
City Planner
RG:DP:ns
Attachments: LF.tter from Applicant
Exhibit "A" - Master Site Plan
Exhibit "B" - Floor Plan
Exhibit "C" - Elevations
Resolution
11
W]
� -3
David A. Drye
6361 Sapphire Street
Alta Loma, CA 91701
October 10, 1984
Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Commission
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Dear. Sir:
This letter is in response to the proposed Conditional Use
Permit 84 -21 - ALTA LOMA CHRISTIAN CHURCH.
Since the last permit issuance to this body there has been a
marked increasa in traffic on Sapphire Street, and .several
near -miss accidents at the entrance to the Church Day School.
This is easily observable from our location directly across the
street. Operation of offices, in addition to any that already
have been provided for in prior permits, at tha proposed site
car. only add to congestion at that intersection of Orange and
Sapphire. Inasmuch as the traffic engineers are reluctant to
further reduce the 40 M.P.H. speed limit through this area, it
is felt that the additional use and physical lack of visibility
from the noi-;h side of the approach on Sapgliire, constitutes an
unacceptable level of risk for personal injury and death.
Other adverse consideration include the urauthoriz(-� sleeping
and feeding of youngsters, the lack of proper walkpath and area
separation plans for free access to other church facilities.
Clearly, there does not appear to be any precedent for such
of
Rancho C:uc;amenga it-se11. Lastly, the lack or preparation and
planning foresight in this latest conditional use permit application
reflect more clearly then ever before the deficiency of the
church to define it goals, methods, and actions. Should it become
necessary to relocate my personal residence, I shall not overlook
the oppo °tunity to solicit the Al;.a Loma C.C. as a purchaser, if
this permit is approve:?.
„ r� Y�s
1.
i�'7
E
E
E
C �
,
_rT : �
i t U
crs
�� -; ..''�� +� • -.. ,— —• a *;A —
,' _��•� —
LO
ui
s r 7
iii <
uj
j4 € ;�= ;F� 3 °,
aS
S
1
J
L
4
m
Y
t ^
Y JY
V L
e
1 Z
ui
W
z
0
0
Z
W
LA
C - �
Q W
i
�Jatp j
W
-
�
�1 _ yy6 9f
m(a` 00 ZS b
zr-
IU V W± G •
W Y W GJJ D J J ice)
a !
'
EE
J
O
~ J7
r Z
n
- iJ -fo
RMP % .
TYPICAL
l
�.• Lx_, t (i�l( 'i1�(' Tttt�'iyo� ��rR`I'1 Y��1 y"W"�fi. ( t""'TMa"r•..•y,ti..r,�.�y _ � .
..'1\ (,({ ,�11� II7 %� I(,V'+ I�(t'III�III �iI I N(" IIM •'� �.IIcW �'� '� r .1^�� t
IJ;
=�:� ii�e.'i r .. r , I � ll•IN {.J ' Irll.
-
(� /nt.f•. q}w7:Jllu�.� i1,0� Y ..T ' `` , — S i .1 ��14 Ii•. _.
I }t ( f
�h� ^- I r ' { I t ! � ' i � ., ��'I �,I. are i { r ,' -•)5. I �•
LAST
�EXISTINfi TBXTUnMp ST(:CaO 7YPICAL/
F_ %(SIN& TEXTURED WOpp - -umN6; APPLY
. HBAr•! 15001 'r, ST-4-j COLOR TO Wt4TCr,
Mt1LTIPURpOSC /pR =5CWOOL 6,C;r TYPICAL .
-. •r.� \�� �rrW+Lg14W.J J... -• JV, 'lit'
.i' -1i= "_, -r 8t 4 .. �� �(e is I - u. I ��'� ; •1`- �.
SOUTH
t'XISTING WOOD SIDING; /' EXISTING WOOD PASC.IA' I
STAIN AS A_o, �� STAIN AS ACOVE TYPICAL/
NEW •9TOREPRONT• et,- '7(;p•NOC
L
. _.iIIWT • - NEW' t < 4 SOL'C+H FIR TRIM w MAIM-
. MULTI PUR-Otl5 /1°RCSCNOOL
. ._ UTAN A9 A ove• 7YI�ICAL— - -
CXTEI�IOIZ _ELEVATION S
cli-r i or, ITL ( :p e"14 - L I
RANCHO CUCAiL'IO.rGA TITLE-. aLEVlaT:0
PLANNING DIx%ZS o N F-XHIBIT: ,(C a SCALE: Tn c nsu
7>-
Ll
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONCA PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 84 -21 FOR THE
CONVERSION OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE INTO A CHURCH
OFFICE LOCATED AT 6390 SAPPHIRE STREET IN THE VERY LOW
DISTRICT
WHEREAS, o,i the 7th day of August, 1984, a complete application was
filed by Alta Loma Christian Church for review of the above - described project;
and
WHEREAS, on the 28th day of November, 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Commission held a public hearina to consider the above- described
project.
follows:
NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Co=issior. resolved as
SECTION 1: Tta- the following findings can be met:
1. That the proposed use is in accord with the Genera .i
Plan, the objectives of tn_ oevelopment Code, ano
the purposes of the district in which the site ir-
located.
2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will oe detrimental to the
public health, safety, or welfare, or materially
injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity.
3. That the proposed use complies with each of the
applicable provisions of the Development Lode.
iETION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts
on the en�,:r')nment and is categorically exempt from the provisions of
the Califorr. a Environmental Quality Act.
SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 84 -21 is approved
subject to the following conditions:
1. Approval is limited for a period of twenty -four (24)
months and shall expire November 28, 1986, unless extended
by 0e Planning Commission
2. A small sign :;hall be posted at the adjacent parking lot
area on private, not public property, directing and
indicating parking for the office use, to the satisfaction
of the City Planner.
Resoluticn No.
Page 2
3. All high intensity security light illumination from the
Alta Loma i.hristian Church property shall be shielded from
the surrounding properties.
4- A landscape planter shall be provided across the driveway
area continuing the proposed streetscape scheme to the
north, in order to detour vehicular use, to the
satisfaction of the City Planner.
5. The kitchen facilities shall be limited to the employees
of the office.
6. Occupancy of the building shall be limited to not more
than 20 persons.
7. The applicant shall submit the necessary information to
the Building and Safety Divsiion in order to comply to
building code requirements and obtain the appropriate
permits for an occupancy change prior to operation of the
office use.
8. Floor plans of the building shall be submitted to the Fire
District for review prior to occupancy.
9. All conditions of approval shall L-2 completed prior to Ask
occupancy of the office.
10. Approval shall expire, m::ss extended by the Planning
Commis on, :f approved use ,gas not cr:mmenced within
twelve (12) months from the date of approval, per
Conditions of Approval.
11. This apiroval shall run, with the applicant and shall
become void upon a change of ownership ,r if the business
operation ceases.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28th nAY OF NOVEMBER, 19&.1.
PLANNING COMRFSSIGN OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY-
E. David Barker, Vice Chairman
ANEST-
Rick Gomez, Deputy Secre— Lary
E.
Resolution No.
Page 3
I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City if Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 28th day of November, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
E
F- Fy_
IL
2
11
V
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 28, 1984
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Pick Gomez, City Planner
BY: Nancy Fong, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84 -48 -
tN" - The development of an square foot
office /warehouse multi- tenant industrial park on 5.75
acres of land in the General Industrial (Subarea 11),
generally located at the northeast corner of 6th Street
and Utica Avenue - APN -209- 411 -17.
I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Requested: Approval of a precise site plan and
architectural design, and issuance of a Negative Declaration.
B. Purpose: Construction of a 80,000 square foot multi- tenant
industrial park.
C. Location: Northeast corner of 6th Street and Utica Avenue.
D. Parcel Size: 5.75 acres.
E. Existing Zoning: General Industrial (Subarea 11).
F. Existing Land Use: Vacant.
G. Surrounding Land Use and 'Zoning:
North - Vacant, industrial buildings; General Industrial
(Subarea 11).
South - Vacant; General Industrial (Subarea 11)).
East - Vacant; General Industrial (Subarea 11).
West - Coca Cola plant, vacant; Industriai Park (Subarea 6).
H. General Plan Designations:
roJ� 'ect Site - General Industrial
North - General Industrial
South - General Industrial
East - General Industrial
West - Industrial Park
ITEM E
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
EA & OR 84 -48 - Pacific Scene
November 28, 1984
Page 3
E. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been
completed by the applicant_ Staff has comp let4d the
Environmental Checklist (Part II) and Yids found no significant
adverse environmental impacts as a result of this project. If
the Commission concurs with these findings, issuance of a
Negative Declaration would be appropriate.
III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS- This project is consistent with the Industrial
Area Specific Pan and the General Pian. The proposed use,
building design and site plan, together with the recommended
conditions of approval, is in compliance with all applicable City
standards. In addition, the project: will n -t be detrimental to
adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environmental
impacts.
IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised for Environmental
Review in The Daily Report Newspaper.
V. RECOMMENDATION: it is recommended that the Planning Commission
approve Development Review 84 -48 by adapting the attached
Resolution with Conditions.
Re�Mct�yIly,gbb tted,
ck toml�z-
ty Planner
NF:ns
Exhibit "A" - Location Map & Industrial Specific Plan
Exhibit "8" - Detailed Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Conceptual Landscape Plan and Plaza Plan
Exhibit "D" - Grading Plan
Exhibit "E" - Building Elevations (5 sheets)
Initial Study - Part II
Resolution of Approval with Conditions
rnd
i-
th
e
ed
)r
Im
d
9
11
E
Ll
C
E.
11
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 28, 1984
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY: Nancy Fong, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMEENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84 -48 -
E E N - he deve opment of an 80,000 square foot
office /warehouse multi- tenant industrial park an 5.75
acres of land in the General Industrial (Subarea !I),
generally located at the northeast corner of 6th Street
and Utica Avenue - APN -209- 411 -17.
I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Requested: Approval of a precise site plan and
architectural design, and issuance of a Negative Declaration.
B. Purpose: Construction of a 80,000 square foot multi- tenant
industrial park.
C. Location: Northeast corner of 6th Street and Utica Avenue.
D. Parcel Size.* 5.75 acres.
E. Existing Zoning: General Industrial (Subarea 11).
F. Existinq Land Use: Vacant.
G. Surroundinq Land Use and Zoning:
North - Vacant, industrial buildings; General Industrial
(Subarea 11).
South - Vacant; General Industrial (Subarea 11).
East - Vacant; General Industrial (Subarea 11).
West - Coca Cola plant, vacant; Industrial Park (Subarea a).
N. General Plan Desi nations:
roject Site - General Industrial
North - General Industrial
South - General Industrial
East - General Industrial
West - Industrial Park
ITEM E
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
EA & DR 84 -48 - Pacific Scene
November 28, 1984
gage 2
I. Site Characteristics: The property is currently vacant and
slopes in a southwesterly direction at approximately 2%.
Vegetation is limited 'to indigenous weeds and Grass.
II. ANALYSIS:
P., General: The proposed ievielopment is designed as a multi -
tenant industrial complex which consisted of 4 buildings with
loading access in the rear. The exterior materials include the
use of tilt -up cu:crete panels with painted texturized
treatment, bronze tinted glass and bronze ainodized aluminum for
windows and trim. Access to the project shall be provided from
6th Street and Utica Avenue.
B. _Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee reviewed
,he project and recommended several design and landscaping
changes. These changes include:
- Enhancing the appearance and function of the
plaza facing Building No. 2 by increasing the
plaza area and providing a strong pedestrian
entrance statement;
- Providing landscaping along northeast si:= of
Building No. 4 by recessing the loading access,
in order to improve building relationship and
pedestrian connections; and
- Providing a stronger architectural statement at
the building corner facing 6th Street and
Utica.
The developer has incorporated the above-mentioned requirements
as shown on Exhibit "B" and "E".
C. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee
reviewed the project and has initial concerns regarding the
driveway access at 6th Street and Utica Avenue. Since new
policies are being developed regarding driveway access for ne,,
developments, the Technical Review Committee has recommended
that the driveway access for this project shall be developed to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Therefore, the
Technical Review Committee has determined that with the
recommended conditions of approval, the project is consistent
with applicable standards and ordinances.
D. Grading Committee: The Grading Committee has reviewed the
project, and with the recommended conditions of approval, has
conceptually approved the grading plan.
.-
E
0
L' J
G
PLAN14ING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
EA & DR 84 -48 - Pacific Scene
November 28, 1984
Page 3
E. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been
completed by the applicant. Staff has completed the
Environmental Checklist (Part II) and has found no significant
adverse environmental impacts as a rEsult of this pz,oject. If
the Commission concurs with these findings, issuance of a
Negative Declaration would be appropriate.
III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the Industrial
Are pecific Plan and the General Plan. The proposed use,
building design and site plan, together with the recommended
conditions of approval, is in compliance with all applicable City
standards. In addition, the project will not be detrimental to
adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environmental
impacts.
IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised for Environmental
Review in The Daily Report Newspaper.
V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission
approve Deve opment Review 84 -48 by adopting the attached
Resolution with Conditions.
Respjctf ily:liibmitted,
ri
Rick om�
Gity canner
fG:NF:ns
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map & 1ndu' trial Specific Plan
Exhibit "B" - Detailed Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Conceptual Landscape Plan and Plaza Plan
Exhibit "C" - Grading Plan
Exhibit "E" - Building Elevations (5 sheets)
Initial Study - Part II
Resolution of Approval with Conditions
4 3
C1
\ I I ! ! ! I SWQ V.
!�
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAINIO \TEA
PLANNING DIVISIOV
�-r,
1 V
NORM
ITEM:
TITLE: - j• "���/ � ��� �/i�
ExtilBIT--
_ 7�Ci W1T4
wo.iu
200AMv. --
Dow"
iis.e
NNo Dom
=10
OmwM
3,
FdK"Wiomw
am
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAINIO \TEA
PLANNING DIVISIOV
�-r,
1 V
NORM
ITEM:
TITLE: - j• "���/ � ��� �/i�
ExtilBIT--
� �..PJ �•1L.J.A./•
,_ IV
CITY Or
RANCHO CUCA,,N /10. 'GA
PUNNING DfVts ov
I
MW
s....
.fYu `i�•
fI!
i�
1 �
�J >
iv 2�•
I
PLAZA PLAN
V
NORTH
11
11
1]
I _ _
III.
I
p
STREET 2
.. -- 7 .. _ —� ...-. a... ...� •�..• r... .
CITY 0,
RANCI -I0 CL'CAi-vio \NGA
PLANNING DIVOON
c
✓A V
`'ORTH
f
iF
oI
i
:s
'e
i
I,
C- F
1
1 .e V)
L•]
F r,
V 6
U'
O O
U Z
C'
I
0
E
0
i`
�i
•
III
f
E_cj
s
NO
�aF
m
i
z
U >
G
0
CU`z
n �
fit" v- -,%Q a �.�•l ..
a�
0
1
U
CIO
r
U>
0
O� Q
A
0
El
CITY OF RAN(M0 CUCP.MONGA
PART II - INITIAL STUDY
MIROhKt AL CHECKLIST
DATE:
.APPLICANT:
FILING DATE:
PROJECT: & AM;-re - -re :A A
PROJECT LOCATION:
I. ENMIRON.LMNTAL I1-LPACTS
(Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached
sheets).
1. Soils and Geoloty. Will the proposal have
significant results ir.:
a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in
geologic relationships?
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
burial of the soil?
C. Change in topography or ground surface
contour intervals?
d. The destruction, covering or modification
of any unique geologic or Physical features?
e. Any potential increase in wind or water
erosion of soils, affecting either on or off
site conditons?
f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition?
g. Exposure of people or property tc geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud-
slides, ground failure, or similar hazards?
h. An increase in the rate of extraction and /or
use of any mineral resource?
2. Hydroloty. Will the proposal have significant
results in:
E-//
YES MAYBE NO
►A
i
V
klo/
a- Changes in currents, or the course of direction
of flowing streams, rivers,.or ephemeral stream
channels?
b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface water
runcff?
c- Alterations to the course or flow of flood
waters?
d. Change in the amount of surface water in any
body of water?
e- Discharge into surface waters, or any
alteration of surface water quality?
f- Alteration of groundwater characteristics?
g- Change in the quantity of groundwaters,
either through direct additions or with-
drawals, or through interference with an
aquifer?
Quality?
Quantity?
h. The reduction in the amount of water other-
wise available for public water supplies?
i. Exposure of people or property to water
related hazards such as flooding or seiches?
3. Air Quality. Will the proposal have significant
results in:
a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile
or indirect sources?
Stationary sources?
b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or
Interference wi *_h the attainment of applicable
air quality standards?
C. Alteration of local or regional climatic
conditions, affecting air movement, moisture
or te=perature?
4. Biota
Flora. Will the proposal have significant results
in:
a. Change in the characteristics of species,
including diversity, distribution, or number
of any species of plants?
Page 2
YES MAYBE NO
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of plants?
40 _ _
El
El
u
Page 3
YES MAYBE NO
c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of `
plants into an area?Y /
d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural
production?
Fauna. Will the proposal have significant results
in:
a. Change in the characteristics of species,
including diversity, distribution, or numbers
of any species of ani =als?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
/
or endangered species of animals?
E/
c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of
ani -nls into an area, or result in a barrier
to the migration or movement of animals?
_
d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or
�r
J
0 /
wildlife habitat?
5. Population. Will the proposal have significant
results in:
a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri-
bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of
the human popu? -ation of an area?
b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or
/
create a demand for additional housing?
6. Socio- Economic Factors. Will the proposal have
significant results in:
a. Change in local or regional sccio- ec .)nomic
characteristics, including economic or
commercial diversity, tax rate, and property
'values?
b. Will project costs be equitably distributed
among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers.
tax payers or project users?
1/
7. Land Use and Planninz Ccnsideratiors. 11ill the
proposal have significant results in?
a. A subsrantial alteration of the present or
land
✓ ✓✓
planned use of an area?
b. A conflict with any designations, objectives,
policies, or adopted plans of any governmental
entities?
c. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of
existing cons=ptive or non- cons•.m:ptive
Ve
recreational opportunities?
a,
8- Transportation, Will the
results in: Proposal have significant
a- Generation of substantial additional vehicular
movement?
b• Effects on existing streets, or demand for
new street construction?
�- Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new p rking?
d- Substantial impact upon existing transporta-
tion systems?
e• Alterations to present patterns of circula-
tion or movement of people and /or goods?
f• Alterations to or effects on present and
Potential water - borne, rail, mass transit or
air traffic?
g- Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
9• Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have
sign- -'icant results in:
a- A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological,
paleontological, and /or historical resources?
10. Health. Safety and Nuisance Factors. Will the
Proposal have significant results in:
a- Creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazard?
b- Exposure of people to potential health hazards?
c- A risk of explosion or release of %azardous
substances in the event of an accident?
d- An increase in the number of individuals
or species of vector or pathenogenic
organisms or the exposure of people to such
organisms?
e- Increase in existing noise levels?
f. Exposure of people to petentiall
noise levels': y dangerous
g• The creation of objectionable odors?
h. An increase in light or glare?
Page 4
YES N.AYBS 230
d
V
t
9C
11
-1C
_Val/
Page 5
YES MAYBE 230
11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant
results in:
a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic
vista or view?
b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive
site?
c. A conflict with the objective of designated
or potential scenic corridors?
12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal
have a significant need for new systems, or
alterations to the following:
a. Electric power?
b.
c.
d.
® f.
7I
9-
h.
Natural or packaged gas?
Communications systems?
Water supply?
Wastewater facilities?
Flood control structures?
Solid waste facilities'.
Fire protection?
I. Police protection?
j. Schools?
k. Parks or other recreational facilities?
1. Maintenance of Public facilities, including
roads and flood control facilities?
m. Other governmental ser-rices?
13. ErerRV and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal
have significant results in:
a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? _-
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing
sources of energy?
c. An increase in the demand for development of
new sources of energy?
d. An Increase or perpetuation of the consumpt'on
of non - renewable forms of energy, when feasible
renewable sources of energy are available?
V
�i
e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or
scarce natural resource?
14, j`andatory Findings of Siznificance.
a. Does the project have the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce
the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
b- Does the project have the potertial to achieve
short -term, to the disadvantage of long -term,
environmental goals? (A short -term impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a relatively
brief, definitive period of time while long-
term impacts will endure well into the future),
c. Does the project have impacts which are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (Cumulatively considerable
means that the incremental effects of an
individual project are considerable when viewed
ir. connection with the effects of past projects,
and probable future projects).
d- Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
Page 6
YES MAYBE No
VZ
M
V/
_tz
II. DISCUSSI?z of ENVIRp yT� EVALUATIO,
ite above questions plus a discussicn of (i.e., of affirmative answers to
proposed mitigation measures).
TW Mzwcjr aM&- *A jE- E
oaC�s WWr' 1AA5W.0 AfFYC.AWT sIMGFE
'SLIWLW sT,rs�ov.D��
'720 AOOP40
E A�
11
D
III. DETEMMINATION
On /the basis of this initial evaluation:
I---� I find the proposed project COULD 140T have a significant effect
ily /14 on the enviro=ent, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
_ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant
! effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect
t� in this case because the mitigation measures described on an
attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
envirnnent, and an ENVIRONMNT IMPACT REPORT is required.
Late 1'1 /ism
C
U
Page 7
619
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 84 -48 LOCATED ON THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF 6TH STREET AND UTICA AVENUE IN THE
GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
WHEREAS, on the 15th day of October, 1984, a complete application war
Pacific Scene, Inc. for review of the above - described project; any
WHEREAS, on the 28th day of November, 1984, the Rancho Cu,::imonga
Commission held a meeting to consider the above - described r.oject.
Planning Commission
That the following can
That the proposed T ject is
objectives of the Genera! Plan;
That the proposed use is in accord with the
objective of the Development Code and the purposes
of the district in which the site is located; and
the proposed use is in compliance with each of
applicable provisions of the Development Code;
That the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety. or welfare, or materially
i.:jurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity.
SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the
environment and that a Negative Geclaration is issued on November 28, 1984.
SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 84 -48 is approved subject to
following conditions and attached Standard Conditions:
PLANNING DIVISION
Berming of up to 3 feet high with a maximum
3 1/2 to 1 against the parking areas
required along 6th Street and Utica Avenue.
All roof mounted equipment, including air
conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated,
shielded from view, and the sound buffered from
adjacent properties and streets.
Resolution No.
Page 2
3. A uniform sign program for this development shall be
required and shall require a separate application to
be aproved by the Planning Division prior to
installation of any signs.
4. Trash enclosures shall be designed per City
standards.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
1. Driveway approaches on 6th Street and at north end
of property on Utica Avenue shall be constructed per
City standards and totally on subject property.
Joint use easements shall be provided for adjacent
Properties prior to occupancy and /or lease.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1984.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGGA
BY:
E. David Barker, Vice Chairman
ATTEST:
Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary
I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission, held
on the 14th day of November, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
C i9
0
E
y
l)
Q
i
d
2
�yO °Ty�LN .N
p Vput V ^UyG
4 �
L•]CL C'L q�
o uvyi ^�, r eN
oiyfq ^
CL qL � q Oyu
M
y p 6 V N
CC 9 u
gP V N y T VCO n
c� Vie«
L L B r^ L L V M
p c'gNyon..l
V O
«L tiV
Nu -
6 + V 9 6C i u°i t q y
H
S
C
i
O
r
V
O
iE
O
n
Cl
Q
O
v
N
L
V U �
H
L
� 6 p
N t
NZ l—
C T O u
o
pc -n
V +N�
W w°
69du q
N C Y -
c 6
V YL. O T
L = b ^ v
y O 9 d
T r
yCNOL.
A _O
C V N
n g�<
v acS�gn
P
_ L
VCPV•O•
C c d a
L C >
^ V�p
Ny yr 'ev
G N —
u —•r V N^
d y
O � OOC w
yl ^�
NI
b
q 6 L Ci
y n
L N p V O g V
Vp P C y^ r
v� o°
2OW Nr,C
d y O
_ d Np Pte'
C
< d
O
C A L p M g«
q�L PN�x-
q
C L'
y �VCV 1
Y
OL V.i 4NNCL
— V y
N <�r
C C O
0 9
.T
V y
d y r
L ' y
y O q
=yy
d
qvy
_ u+
9 N
V ^9
e p
9
Z l V
d �
OL•
t 9 O
y V q
NO^ d
°V p9
L C C +
O
b V E
O p1 d p
q C N C
d
6 6+
S 0 9 m
= P t V d
o N Aw T
` L O C
N Gym V
a p E p
L q
V L d C d
L Lys
C
_ N L
W � 6
scy�a
°r uli
Cw°. V qO
a
V g d d d
C
Tdu N
c
O
� O <p
ayi °<Et�
d q • C C
O N
N C L
L p t p V
Vf
vP .0
c
o c m
.o9 u
2 6
� O ✓ q
y � C
N � M
w
« r q
• L d .0.
.. L
rC.d.y
O q
9 N V O
C =
c
-�v
� C L
J ^ q N
CC �L
C !c N
d
q d d
bI
ti
�
d
C
C
I
•!
_
M
1
O N< s p V N
+t
L i�gEsNEu
G`- Z ?zvsu
b4YNU� o
V C
V 9r� p
N
V
°V
Z
ELO
L
L
•..N
�`N
TOy
b
q
C
y
p
L�
G
60p
P
CN•�L�gOCV<
J
0V0
V
C L
° N d<�
r
p
9 9 d
O
��
Y• pp Y
�L
y
�V.
OCV�rH�V
v
Y
O
V O R
q
q M
C C
>
n
.L �LO .��LL•
der
.
OL
F fi pyO
LN9L.q 00
C
N.^L
y
9
�
� �
q
VrEyN4I�V
=y
O
O
u 0
i °N
C
V
LO,
APp wr TyAC
C
pq7
P
� <9OVVa
s
'Y
.^aN
p�
C
V J q d
Y
P
2
ol
q
V
�••
<ai
O
< s
�9
6�Z «�ML.O.�
L- Z
2 O
vP .0
c
o c m
.o9 u
2 6
� O ✓ q
y � C
N � M
w
« r q
• L d .0.
.. L
rC.d.y
O q
9 N V O
C =
c
-�v
� C L
J ^ q N
CC �L
C !c N
d
q d d
bI
ti
E
N
C
1
CF w i 4 •'i. l Y O v� � �Vi b
6
l °< � q d p� G D V
v V�
e
k� —L .i, mar o�
l
.e -nn4° $C9 LcT a
—r
4w•N— °V.�i
—C.0 rCN �Ni°o r
N
S
.L..S r ... p c .J C� a .�i 0 .°•
.' ^ `_ �'
s J 6 o?
n
y V� �—
c
J
OnOY
♦d
Cql
O'J
.�YN
yw.°. Lr
.1n.n GV NJ 4 ycV
CT
i
cola waO
>L'
d
ye.c VLE
d— w y L J = u
dNaO gYa.0 �rL L cOC G6rn
L P .� 4 w •r L 9 J w• r
S 6p V
G q
c4
J�'L Y Lu
La2�CC'n
sC
�Q1J� '—' .Ge
O 4 q a
• c G
V`- ^ A
wY yV 5
°
w
C 0 J rM ^ O 4
2 4
T N 6 a
?
w
° POSY y
^ =rr
r
� dNq
ac = —N 4L9
^rte OaO Twr
r�C Neu NCL•�wgN
q .j Y V r Car iJ O
Lta q CO(O C•O LO4' � T
L°
C L V n PO O 0� V y r
N` w
°= C V W wL• C L:
yri t •• r
U C r w y 4
N N=
.J .0
O t .
= q Y69 O
y .Li ^ N .• d
6 Cu dr L Cy
N__ V
_
N4 q
Wi Ow.°.'!
G
^— O
=J
O •• V V �• iy w G` .Vi O
L O d
C 9 P O w
__
L C u ✓� 1_ Q
N a J w L O C
C
•e P L O
L N
55�> L uO
CV,.r`.2
V_00C
d� a O� V V r i — C q L O L
✓ C G N
_ u9a Y;l y�.�..
4— ^SJj�'C LC9p ^O ` lgpy^
L LC
06.TC0
°`r'
C� 9�jL
Va_q 'YL
g26.Vir
CO �� C C_y Nq�°
C�
w.NaV�cO 9Y V•L.•> V
PNwC.00 q� 'J 4 NC O C
aJQ
"� ° Yo•- i
Ty?
a
�y er`u� UOG
e - {
c°y
c
7:9
.5
..Wy.
O
c_
—
b
t
N
J
°p n.or Z a- .L.n
'o e�y 3 orgM
° Y
Z N C L
VO f.Q4 N C O
^ LIWrL ^,rs..•�M
°Nj
ra
-i _ P.
`u
2" Je
°�•"4.°,
Waa Lo,gE r•.
v g'e,,, "o NL
^C —.L
yO O 4o VL
�q pE .�yo �� �dpOV
4S
°" 4r M P.Y•
°a L,.` «v_r., NOS c�
GNG
o' .L..
Ty PY Cl Y
-iw? e N
—C NLq C ..•.yV
° p` °
C� y c N L C_ q V N
g
El
O 4 G 'u U O
V �
w O L
L_
•N
OL ^ L�V QO.
r0
°a
a
— 4W _'n 60CV UO�O N_L `COOC
CO
V
J TP
d
w i r N= O O C
r YSV POd9 C. O L
r L r W°
y q �« G�
a�q�
C O
9
L L ^
y� wL• N C°
q O
°P> rVLyN
�S
yy� Vri
7n .L.r2��N O O
N C
9Cyn
�°J,
y C a r
9 P V«
°r >� Ga0 OrL
j PC qO N .G`OV ^NW na
�r4ip
VC_ VNa
-= 96
C^ W< LNP °• °V V
O.O qOV
_
q'
n - 72 72 O
qM N
°G
YN >uaiP YOLL
qt q V70 `J s r EdE P`y
N'a�
NO
V•J
_v NC _LV,
N.4c w
V r C O
C N- •S V O f' C r° g
C {: n Y
L
N .V• � L Q C 4 e �T•
LeL O J
.• w V` V 9 L Y V
O
p LP
Le a a S
C 4
d
4 W
u
g V C
r t� yy$
«O w N a r 0
P O � C <.L• r L�
J
°ew
OC
iallo
va> V"o'vc 7 CVL
�� y7ayA °r 4ae <cL.c qr o~n�
V O
L
o C> M V V 6> C
V C
°>
r C N
°9
n �L MO C•°�NL N97
(O�
O'SYLCE 4N4L 4M OLO
V
Cr
V L n V Pr r H
w
• G q r L 9°
Q� fa: G
k P O
E
N
C
d• a l C L' P d P • t O L T t
O V jr, V
q� G O.
=Ay y_r 9C CO c� O V y L b Cy
'•� L C> � V Y v q J O �` P P q O C c O N d
G
O'r
VrbrAVL �0�0� �Tr '6V — —•O qa� O_L.sO
NH
_ioL ..° �L,I�. 'O ae s c�= A '° �cC 'O• o c=
V CU�Cq GGN _ —w =G r —C ^ P uq OL.a VO C
Ci
� � q Y• P G r a T r' L C 9 N a N l J n P C T 9 'L. � y — L a A d d y
^q r GiV �9 q O V_cL L Lrd J V`
v V° � L C Q t r r P N d N d i n
dCN °09 'VC,e n dgFE Vd'eM V O' uLw Lr r yr�L
> C•J n•Y u LN .^PN ._ wZCO A i Lc � —= LOw
C
`ayVT u00y9C a•L.r
L —NOLO aC`OT
V N N w JG >�ya
r T L n V d t c
=L4° cnY v v c LdY cw n'c bpVly
q 6_
C M N N N w> O—
G
NCr .n 'LC N CGq O V 9 n. P P �Ldd �N_ C
Y n "` wCUrO cMwc Pr � A p A y wr'y I9
=c
NM 6 ~Cl Vn 9gLVV 9Nr Td 9 ^. PT_aClC C
T�
L
HO Oq•JCC C T14 C_�rP i � C— q�C Cam` w
N O N N N d q � •• L N C n+ ' ti q V O L P i C q
r t.� u .C'VC ^c C•+A yOd v�MN•J ' L —P Nwur Np r
^ CVO r0 `d0'�'L dO_ V d d 9 u--1 gP�.Oi LVrA
6N IN V d 6q� 6 nC V IrOq � Na V✓ N 2 >� J L6 � >-o� u�
g
d P d 4 d^ C CA . C O. P
`{o— �o oa qyq a4 o co o� c—
00. M• C NIY I' q C O. „O.0ON g6gs[ —1] PO. P
.00.
N — d O• V\ c c
q q= � OQx M .i— wew EV OPd ^rNG OA V
Aq LS VN ACd C6— `A GT�W qV�N O yN YO
KC
O q =4
�� ' V C /aOe NrLC n��> �LOtgd NVPL dP C>N >�
d�cNi< LgCM dOY+ C. +^
N 9 `r N qt_ n/V�t nq Cw V C�bd ^qlj� nS jP
9 V C � d L N LY
d q L W �� 2— dOrpiL
YI OV AuN x— cG ... PV...g °Ni =Ind �qr Pe _N` Ny
M O S> . V �ja Tw`O yN�N �O]n '�� Ir ¢_C l�q MCI'• V�
w`LCVT OgOO n OT .It4 9d
J Q= 0 44 d y C d A 0 O
C •� y r C q O w V T q A O V O G P O E r 1. d am— r Iq r V O
I.L. —.c A
— °� ✓o:.. ..: a� ccal°aq °�.>.” wo'O < +�_ Cu�> oo• '^i'° qwy
N .VG L .O rw U C_ yw ^V NFL AULV �� � >q pLN
V y H N A V q A V qFi, V P =N O` d V
TP
V 9 O C
q Y C C N' 9 q _ C Q ^ •" nr O O L d q A L L — V
_ y L {wd >
L p Y u U d 4 A V g d � N L III V 6
>
w tpN HpN f.0 <O �•ONwq < 6n WVMOO.y N —NbN (N► r V'L"A
� C iN0 HNL
01I 44' 4
I
ci
M
c qv P. -yam dr •
IIII 02 V- 9v<Oa C.0 �r �^ •0 ^� N
`d`_6 Edc FOIO UO d` C 'VY
L'i C`.C6 C° „W.r Y, V•.jU O..n dC �` O du
G` V✓ V V C P- N O i Ll p O
u �I Q�YO iMN�n. N „ c jN - •L. : qAa °'
d -• �u o��o' =bb � Pa 2L s c i
n J� NAG uwmy ,E' V „dc - Op V N� L° rpN qL
✓ pO YL•�� °f N'�' SJ �O Zvi'/ � �q MPrp J
y V y. W V Q n. d O Y. G y �. ` q C � 6 ✓ C c d N
yI _o = pc Mm � ^ ✓...V v` _ � �� = C ”` o.qq q q L
V T Oy -yL q8y' O N° GV 6P
W V�q a�q� W 9 a i q qY r0 r' +qr
VI y`vC =p,� =0 N > -�W �� C_ V•R- rV dC~T .-
m .O V V• •w C•i y W r �' L C d d 2 V O- - I +' O -V' r � O i V
�� C � =�✓d .• '•M nJ O„ 'JP V .- �~6 Oar
_✓ = V u •O.r V j 4 �� C q q „� V V N � V v •^ � V J ° y O
--
dO IV'iU �vvq O .J M bq7 r•G�p C • ? Gpy •qi
pS' y W t L C t0.1 4 q V O W - D.O T q .••. •Li .Oi. N
O.aU e. •q.rO N x0 .a0 C� LC V
LVp WNO WVV �6 e_ <r
m
G y .L.. q� C n C d • N f.
v� .o V V ��•° C u O- V O C V V-
�„
a_.O• .` C 4.•O.a L �fnn �OLa v�V
C Vy J r• T q�v ` L `'L 0 =�j YL4
•• p T r V •L.. O V r F W_ q ` O 4'O W0. O „ r
O0. � GE C� .Ur OdT '^ V60 V Q O O�OL LL.Ni�
�c � � -vJC .„• doc °° ePOT o L o ='iq cg uo0
�= L - GL �Y`.•'. Np �y.°o b a. g °cam
T a W Sqg..
N LV OyJ � VV O � C NOy XO NOy
L L _ cv •^ Y L- d P �` ` O V_ O_ � r r a V� V v
u «O paL `�L° ✓C 2 C r rgi'WC is =aLi
Z c+c oq „
l w „✓ V
P� ✓L �V .Li. IC O „jL V^J Fwd 9 LaCC ^VV O Vdl
O.O� EO
Pi Oy Y0. yWW �CruL „p q ✓L y 5
CS 'z
12T
i C O V d �O -• 9 y y O l Ol t d O g 0 0 N V
�- c d y c �oj
V PN C l? L O v
�. C b � N r V W � L b q p O- L✓ V N • q C' O .�
<O. O V C E U y r VF O C q L O O N 6 I I I ✓ei q.2 L= a
V S �LN6 H9q
OI
E -23
11
t[)
4r
bi
S
O
b
q
C
i
��
V
a
_
N
V
•r
NN
`�
0 C
C
q M C
q v
CJ•
•�
�
L �
V �
^ L
T N O
= d
p`
` ^ 6
C
C
C
>
P I!
y
N
i d O
C y V N
y
.N•.c
ro �e
no
zL
-.-
brb E W
-9 u
Y�
r_cv
Ve
u V
l
q r
V
9
..• 6 C
_ L� �
— V
V �
q
y 0
i.
^
�' �•
4
a ^_ -^
`
q q
y
ro C O
8 f•
—
rY.
•`r ..
�NN � c
N
W L . N
"Li„ m
�n
`
,PCa
P^
�=
O� tC
� ^C7`•
T -O �M
�q` f.N
C
`!'n��?
f:0
b-
A iq
iuE
vW �
r^
cbbCr
Eo•
-
k
0
P
N
Z
Lq
•°.•
Pt Cd
n
r
d
q
�
L C
•D. 0°
q 0 0^ r
✓
L
V P
L
P O
•L.. T •
d q N
L y
P O
V<
r> Np = b C
C
V
L C r
L C V. •.
C y •� d y
y p �.
t N
.
c
°
Q
L,°� °L
�^ a
yndic
c
PNUpvg
Ln
b
N`
E
� l
P
b
V
—
7 d L
PV06
q y
•.. = n P
�
L q O 01 ° Y.
d
„
Va
T•. -^1.Cr
r
PVu pO
�_>
O1
�r
VawQ�
Nn
r0
p
LV
�.O.tb
Nq_r
Via°
—`
i
C
'J =r
w •�^
CC J
N4q
Lyf� L
L✓
4yo6
c
Q
e✓'... 21
q r
Q
r Vq � �
O� p
T� q V
ono
•.^ d
— q q .
� �
L
�
L L L
V V P
N
`�.
d
vj °r
•y�•gyv
co �a
�c
f•r
N
�O.NZ LC
N
Lv 6C°
\°.'o LV
Vn °nib
a
H b
C
O !0 b
e-o
n
n P
C
W g n n lT
ffL
E��
C 0
n S r C
V
V 7
C e T W
E c
Loy
a.�
�
a` >.
b
nc"
N —..
...
c„ -
a• C
d'Laua�
..N. c. .N..
.r.
.•.-
w'J
�D
�qlq
q�C
6 —C
rb
Pa
^
Lf >O
NO COO
wr•lL
9
°N
°V
aP°
S4 °C
� °�
'V
•>LpN d�
L N
V
r0
p
6
\EW>.0
nOV�
VPU
PC Pr
= °y qq0.
'�'
LG
L
OV r
•OiVC
r�W, 'tea -W
-v�o
N ^`•erc
Nw
u eb
lVM
>J
T
O
NOr.•t•V..
t rq
q
v.vvvyr
< 40
on.. e='i
v_mJ L'�
°u `o o•e
o! '
Pdw
a.°�.
<`o .°.
0
w gi i
t[)
•F • d d
V a O O T
O q �
C
U
i a .
Ar CL
r � r
6 E q v d W
=u
c _
EIL o 4� r
r L V q O
4 J r L
P
mo �'• E m
LqN r' a
apa Op, Cd
qL •J' � V Y
C p
YM� vP NC
Wa _N T. uq•
OI ��
O
°
aJ
a
r
J
u
O
r
L
L
0
v
°
r °
�v
Y�
c E
`OLL� a �. d •°..�
n ✓L � O — p
_v4 i
T .Y 4 9qN
L C d
i nt N 2 V L T q 2
n c
iC P2
!Jdc VT ,`p`✓ iT
i Q O V T J � r ✓ T�
e
c ✓ L 9 ° l W y
Ic >.V.. ....°.
— � s
i r c•L ° i �p
fro
i ✓a�[pm. o cc =� � Lr
O � N
O
N
v
d
a
N
O
6
r
� V
E
L
G
L
C Y
P r
L
T_
a
L
✓ A a O
O
O l
— O
l � L
— N r
�o ar d
z✓ c a
r o v^ € —
yc dT
.ad i` 4d
p�
d `c «% c
L a Ls ro
`a n P en u
o d a
N V ✓ O p
V V�
O O
V q Y
i ✓` P` Yd C
S p y ✓ Y q
C p N C N r i O
VI Yfl Ipl �
V
L
�I
✓ L p.
N
i
c
c
vi
9
N S A P
O
O
C y G j
r✓ N
N l
i L
P✓
a.
°• _
d
4�
�ooar
r
— L °
6•
W A Y.
r
U
M S
L
Py .•�
V
L L✓
L
t
awo'
A N
V
ii
w
i
`cam
°Z
C
vV
cc
nr
P_.A
l
0 4.
J— q ✓
z
n
V
Z:
ry nR
".s:=
`i
w
NO�v
N T
C .�
y
..
L
P
d
• P
q C
q
1!
1�
.
i
V
O
T
✓PL 4K
V
Q.
o
iC`
u
L, c n• d
E
n•
zqN
` a
°
c
�-
T A
O
\t l
O
�
SCV
LT�L
O
r
v
d
a
N
O
6
r
� V
E
L
G
L
C Y
P r
L
T_
a
L
✓ A a O
O
O l
— O
l � L
— N r
�o ar d
z✓ c a
r o v^ € —
yc dT
.ad i` 4d
p�
d `c «% c
L a Ls ro
`a n P en u
o d a
N V ✓ O p
V V�
O O
V q Y
i ✓` P` Yd C
S p y ✓ Y q
C p N C N r i O
VI Yfl Ipl �
C ,2�
V
L
✓ L p.
N
c
c
vi
9
N S A P
O
O
C y G j
r✓ N
N l
i L
P✓
a.
°• _
d
4�
�ooar
r
— L °
6•
W A Y.
r
U
M S
L
Py .•�
V
L L✓
L
t
awo'
A N
V
ii
i
`cam
°Z
C
vV
cc
nr
P_.A
l
0 4.
J— q ✓
z
n
V
Z:
ry nR
".s:=
`i
w
NO�v
N T
C .�
y
..
L
P
d
• P
q C
q
1!
1�
.
.• c
V
O
T
✓PL 4K
V
Q.
o
iC`
u
L, c n• d
E
n•
zqN
` a
°
c
�-
T A
O
\t l
O
�
SCV
LT�L
O
r
C
°L � °
t
6•
q
ZC
Z
N
C ,2�
El
l
0
V
L
✓ L p.
N
c
— a
V
C y G j
L •n
P✓
°• _
d
v i
F
4Q— P
M S
Py .•�
r 7
t
awo'
A N
V
°Z
°o
—
cc
ry nR
—
`i
w
NO�v
N T
El
l
0
11
O
z
aJ
U
G
O
L
d
1A
E
Pr G_ P
L r
V V
�vq vm_
eq e
m
P
p C
m-
9 Q a y
rm a"
Y w l
O O C
^ mr
V P N
i F �
u
O = H
^ n
` q V
m� uLO
e m
q Z M Y l
Yo °
E w o
i
6 M i �C•9�°r
9
l
P
em
v
q �
C 9
V Y
aN
L q
M `
r �
V q
o L
p O
me
L P
. 4
z
r 7
p
— c
'J 9
p
V
m
r-
0
V
L
C
T
aW
u u
L L
M4
c ='
�4p
M F
m�
L
v
P
Y
r
O
y8
O
l
L..
v
{i
n
c
0
6
y U
m �
a c
G
L
t. q
V ^
x,
VI
L
Yu
L O
P _
^ C O f
q q
n
r
p
« L ^J
^W �
q O G
i
L L�H
am �
C O G O C
`
mr p�C
Ls m�
� u
L C L 4 q
«v «rr
uoa -
n V q M
V q
g�N nmy
m
7 y
9 S
9 +
o
4
.. a
r w
8
ti
C �o '
V L b
i
^ L
v �
wbi
n r
q V q
L
c M e
0 0
v
p V ^ V
L q m L q
ti
�f J �
LO
L arm c
m
isFon
p-
L V 6rq `
`�
moo« —
�
4
G-
3
o-
zo..
L O N L L
4
L C
a- Gi
O
_
«n
O
I
V
L
O
1
m
Y
r
�
u
ae
dJV.p
n
Q
Pr G_ P
L r
V V
�vq vm_
eq e
m
P
p C
m-
9 Q a y
rm a"
Y w l
O O C
^ mr
V P N
i F �
u
O = H
^ n
` q V
m� uLO
e m
q Z M Y l
Yo °
E w o
i
6 M i �C•9�°r
9
l
P
em
v
q �
C 9
V Y
aN
L q
M `
r �
V q
o L
p O
me
L P
. 4
z
r 7
p
— c
'J 9
p
V
m
r-
0
V
L
C
T
aW
u u
L L
M4
c ='
�4p
M F
m�
L
v
P
Y
r
O
y8
O
l
L..
v
{i
n
c
0
6
y U
m �
a c
G
L
t. q
V ^
x,
VI
L
Yu
L O
P _
^ C O f
q q
n
r
p
« L ^J
^W �
q O G
i
L L�H
am �
C O G O C
`
mr p�C
Ls m�
� u
L C L 4 q
«v «rr
uoa -
n V q M
V q
g�N nmy
m
7 y
9 S
9 +
o
4
.. a
r w
8
ti
C �o '
V L b
i
^ L
v �
wbi
n r
q V q
L
c M e
0 0
v
p V ^ V
L q m L q
ti
�f J �
LO
L arm c
m
isFon
L V 6rq `
moo« —
�
I
L O N L L
«n
0
cc «m
ae
Gm^ �
a
f a
�
Pr G_ P
L r
V V
�vq vm_
eq e
m
P
p C
m-
9 Q a y
rm a"
Y w l
O O C
^ mr
V P N
i F �
u
O = H
^ n
` q V
m� uLO
e m
q Z M Y l
Yo °
E w o
i
6 M i �C•9�°r
9
l
P
em
v
q �
C 9
V Y
aN
L q
M `
r �
V q
o L
p O
me
L P
. 4
z
r 7
p
— c
'J 9
p
V
m
r-
0
V
L
C
T
aW
u u
L L
M4
c ='
�4p
M F
m�
L
v
P
Y
r
O
y8
O
l
L..
v
{i
n
c
0
6
y U
m �
a c
G
L
t. q
V ^
x,
VI
L
Yu
L O
P _
^ C O f
q q
n
r
p
« L ^J
^W �
q O G
i
L L�H
am �
C O G O C
`
mr p�C
Ls m�
� u
L C L 4 q
«v «rr
uoa -
n V q M
V q
g�N nmy
m
7 y
9 S
9 +
o
4
.. a
r w
8
ti
C �o '
V L b
i
^ L
v �
wbi
n r
q V q
L
c M e
0 0
v
p V ^ V
L q m L q
ti
�f J �
LO
0
u
;,ITT OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 28, 1984
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: L ioyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer
SUEJECT: REVIEW OF UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING POLICY
At the present time, a condition of approval of all development and
subdivisions in the City is that existing overhead utility li esof 12KV or
less on the property must be placed underground. The basis for this
requirement for subdivisions is Title 16.36.090 of the Municipal Code and for
otner approval is policy only. The cost of work of this kind is about $70 per
foot for an average size utility line, thus for a project with both electric
and phone lines, the cost could be in the range of $1 >0 per foot.
This report is for the purpose of reviewing the cost - benefit relationship of
this requirement for the various types of development in the City and what if
any, changes in policy should be made. '
ANALYSIS
One of the major sources of visual blight in any community is the presence of
overhead utility lines. For many years, new developments in this and other
com!nunities have been undergrounding all new utility services. This has ,wade
a significant improvement in the appearance of the City, particularly in
residential areas. There is virtually no opposition to the policy of
undergrovnding new services by developers. There has, however, been serious
concern about the equity in the policy as it applies to Pxisting utilities
fronting smaller developments, particularly in industrial areas. This concern
is based on tie benefit of the policy and to whom„ the benefit accrues.
The benefit appears to be solely aesthetic and, as such, is enjoyed by all
residents of the City. Many developers have argued that the current
requirement places an inordinate burden on their properties, with no burden on
nearby properties which have no fronting utility lines. This inequity is
particularly noticeable in the industrial area where such an aesthetic benefit
is reduced.
ITEM F
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Review of Utility Undergrounding Policy
November 14, 1984
Page 2
E
Another way in which the benefit is reduced is where the street is not a major
traffic carrier. For this reason, the Public Utilities Commission has
established the following criteria for utility- funded undergrounding programs:
I. Such undergrounding will avoid or eliminate an unusually heavy
concentration of overhead electric facilities;
2. The street right -of -way is axtensiveiy used by the general public and
carries a heavy volume of pedestrian or vehicular traffic; or
3. The street right -of -way adjoins or passes through a civic area or public
recreation araa or an area of unusual scenic interest to the general
public.
Where to Underground: Based on the PUG criteria, an undergrounding priority
list attached was developed for the City. This list was intended to guide
the utility funded program, but provides a basis for general undergrounding
policy. If the list were expanded for additional undergrounding work not
eligible for the PUC program, the next most desirable categories would be
residential collector, secondary arterials and streets. The attached map
shows the locations on on- street overhead lines in the City.
How to Underground: Realistically, the State nandated, utility funded program
in Resolution No. 81 -158 for major streets will not be finished in the
foreseeable future. The question becomes how to achieve additional
undergrounding equitably with the greatest cost benefit.
When doing projects with funds obtained as a portion of all utility user fees,
the money is derived from all bill- payers in the City - -a method which seems to
be the fairest possible. When the full cost of undergrounding is imposed on
only the fronting property, the cost is greatly concentrated and raises the
question of whether the berafit vs. cost ratio is reasonable to the property
owner. A further issue ' +n this respect is that the PUC rules consider a
lenoth less than 600 feet rct cost - effective and use this as a minimum. Also,
the Southern California Edison Co. strongly resists undergrounding stretches
l,ss than 600 feet.
Options: The following options are presented to provide ways of lessening the
impact of undergrounding on smaller projects.
1. Retain existing policy of requiring undergrounding for all approvals or
subdivisions, with a provision for deposits or lien agreements on
frontages less than 600 feet.
2. Require undergrounding or an equivalent fee from large developments only,
based on the number of units, building valuation or a similar parameter
(ability to absorb cost). 0
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Review of Utility Undergrounding Policy
November 14, 1984
® Page 3
3. Require a fee, less than cost, for all permits, based on frontage area or
similar variable.
4- Define an "Exempt" area, or type of development, which would not benefit
from, nor contribute towards, undergrounding.
5. Underground with PUC program or assessment district only, with -no
requirement imposed on new development.
All options are apparently used it, one California city or another, according
to a poll taken by Engineering in 1531. Responses, however, indicate that the
nt
requireme to underground is used sparingly around the State.
In further regard to No. 3, cons iderat'6o� should be given to the cumulat;ve
effect of fees in general and whether adding to the existing fee structure is
comens> ,rate with the benefit received.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that a combination of Options 2 and 5 be
used as fo-Tows:
Eliminate the requirement for developers to place existing lines underground,
except for projects having a frontage of 600 feet or more along a secondary or
major arterial.
This would limit the requirement t^ iergths sufficient to be ir
placed underground and to only t:ae largest mirdiately
categories of development. projects. It would apply to all
If such a policy is desired by the Planning Commission, staff should be
directed to proceed with the appropriate amendments to Titles 12 and 16 of the
Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code for consideration by the City Council.
Respectfully submitted_
Attachments
G
i
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -158
I
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A
PRIORITIZED LIST OF POTENTIAL PROJECTS FOP.
IMPLE!'LENTATION OF AN ACTIVE UNDERCROUNDIiG
PROGRAM
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 7th day of October, 1981.
AYES: Frost, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, Schlosser
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Phillip D. Schlosser, .yayor
A?iEST: ' /
WHEREAS, under the provisicrs of Public Utilities Commission
Rule 20, the Edisun
Company makes available each year funds to cities
for the purpose of undergrounding
overhead utility lines; and,
WHEREAS, since incorporation, Rancho Cucamonga has accumulated
$293,111 in this
account; and,
WHEREAS, the Engineering staff has undertaken to acquaint the
Council with the
existence of these funds, the procedures involved in
the development of
a project and recommend a priority for projects for
implementation u—ie- the
program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
Of Rancho Cucamonga, that the following seven
potential projects along
major arterial streets are adopted in priority order for
implementation
of an active undergrounding program:
1. Archibald Avenue - Foothill to Base Line Road.
2. Foothill Boulevard - Haven to Ramona.
3. Haven Avenge - Foothill to Arrow.
4. Base Line Road - Carnelian Street to Turner Avenue.
5. Carnelian Street - Base Line to 19th Street.
G. Nineteenth Street - Haven Avenue to West City Boundary.
BE IT ALSO RESOLVED that the City Council directs staff to
implement the following
project with currently available funds:
1. Archibald Avenue - Foothill to Base Line Road.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 7th day of October, 1981.
AYES: Frost, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, Schlosser
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Phillip D. Schlosser, .yayor
A?iEST: ' /
7 2
Lli
J _ R
- O
O 2 2 2 N F z
N 0 � O U U � 2
!- c n rr � ? sn O
W j i¢ 0 �O Z Li
lT O Q F
LO
O j W
Tr-
r Y�
!! t ' -' "a, ' I , ■ I ( - alp -��� ■
1 W t
Iltia ■ � t I� .
F7 -i-7 ' �� '- -_ !1 �',.- + +'' - -- - 3Ad Na AtlN
77 7
Aij
Is
i 1 •!•: i. aC - . 1 = �%f 7� 1y !a -- :;4* - i_'i
1 c t• °I - J '��= +-, 'ii' i, iY''' '' -'i-t r1x-= it'd - - --tr
- ',3..• ; � s �_.` t. —.. su;�_ c — „may � ��..t —r: �`I :i 1■ _. t� .
�i..��t �h 3ndr ^xa ; -�'y tea, o�renoa{'di� •_s 7_ � ; l --' t _. _l; �t.tl.�� . � - _--'
Y. • M_; .�- i tir s. y�-- ■- .:5. - -1� 7, .
- �%r1-- -- ti �\ , : _ 1 ` i=ce `I ' _1�• i
i ■•1 _ t I i �t 1
i�■
.
f , `YU �NdIT3Ntl�➢._.i., •,. ! f� _ G -if - -- I
Xr -
1
.... - -_. 1_1' ti.A• `. i; -'� ” %- � -'4.•_ �.7 f:.:. 1; = •1 ... :'..'. .Y -ty"
t .' t:- s',-i. - 1 is -t . - � I Ly,� •. ....� /�.- ;iii - -' !_'� i