Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1984/12/12 - Agenda Packet
Va• � t ate. t i Ot 1 C") C. �On n J. �n r to a O � t 3 n M rn C- *7 C Z J• Q t a to v a n "M N 11-4 N � w i n CITY OF RANNCHO CUC ,N 10\G.-k 1'LACN'NUNG CO,N -1 I\ SIO�z AGE WEDNESDAY December 12, 1984 7:00 p.m. LIONS PARK CO" UNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE RANCHO CIICA.MONGA, CALIFORNIA A C T I O N L Pledge of Allegiance IL Roll can � 1 Commissioner Barker x Commissioner Rempel_X Commissioner Chitiea xx Commissioner Stout Commissioner McNial x III. Announcements �. Consent Calendar TF:e following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and toncontroversial. one time e They will be acted on by the Commission at without di r� <2sion. If anyone has concern Ever any item, APPROVED 5 -0 it shoUld be removed Por disausscon. with �rermova of Item ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DF C. VIEW 84-45 VELOPMENT iiUI ' ' I EN - RhP devElopment of a 43,080 square oc,t industrial building on 2 acres of land in the General Industrial/Ran Served District (Subarea S) located at 07 (portion). 9871 8th Street, east of Cottage Avenue - APN 205 - 193 -o5, B. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 12091 - REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION C. AND APPROVED 5 -0 sr.35 acres in the Me-- edium -Iiivr -- `vuwjuuuum L`nits on District located at the northeast co ner of 8th )and Grove APN 207- 251 -02, 03, 13. 1 - awelung units on 32.3- acres f land inYhe Low Residential District (2-4 du/ac) located at the southeast corner of Banyan Street and Carnelian Street - APN 1062- 361 -01; 1062 - 371 -01. Planning Commission Agenda December 12, 1984 Page 2 V. Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. PIease cvcit to be recognY>ed by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. APPROVED 4 -0 -0 -1 D. AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83 -07 - with deletion of CHRISTESON - An amendment to the conceptual plan for the free standing bldg. Virginia Dare Center, a business park consisting of office, at the northeast commercial, restaurant and theater uses on 13.1 acres of land corner of the site. in the General Commercial District, located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue - kPN 1077 - 401 -01, 03. APPROVED 4 -0 -0 -1 F. REVECIONS TO PARCEL MAP 8303 - CHRISTESON - A with deletion--o-T- change from 15 parcels to 11 parcels - A divi7o—n--ol 13.1 Parcel 5. acres in the General Commercial District (GC) located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue - APN 1077- 401 -01, 03. GAVE STAFF DIRECTION g. TO INCLUDE MITIGATING MEASURES Ill NEGATIVE DECLARATION. nz viz ry - jomN -lain - ine aevelopment of a 524 unit apartment complex, to be built in 3 phases, on about 58.3 acres located on the north side of Highland Avenue, east of Haven Avenue in the MH Development District - APN 202- 271-59, 60. AND PARCEL MAP RRIS - A -Lyx %,vLnrAIN I - A 431VISion Ot ZZ.= acres of land into 2 parcels in the Low Medium (4-8 du/aci Development District, located on the west side of Beryl Street, south of 19th Street -APN 202 - 032 -30, 3L. ar -- - n -n1 1 - a pruposeu suAaivision to create 103 residential lots on 21.41 acres in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4-8 dulac) generally located on the west side of Beryl Avenue, north of Base Line Road - APN 202- 032-30, 31� Planning Commission Agenda December 12, 1984 Page 3 APPROVED 5 -0 L ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMEND!114ENT 84 -02 - HAVEN AVENUE VERLAY DISTRICT - Planning Commission review of public comments and recommendations of the Interim Development Policies for Haven Avenue between 4th Street and Foothill Boulevard. APPROVED 5 -0 J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSI'fENT AND GENERAL PLAN AiU[EAdDbIEN i 84 -04 -A - HAVEN A'; E OVEtt AY DISTRICT - A General Plan Amendment from Office to Industrial Park for approximately 40 acres of land located on the west side of Haven Avenue, between Foothill Boulevard anti Arrow Highway, in conjunction with the Haven Avenue Overlay District - APN 208 - 331 -01, 12, 13, and 208 - 341 -01. APPROVED 5 -0 K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESRMFN'r ANn nrvrr nn%crum --%- a - n ueveiopment District Amendment roam OP Office /Professional) to LSP (industrial Specific Plan) for approximately 40 acres of land located on the west side of Haven Avenue, in conjuration with the Haven Avenue Overlay District - APN 298- 331 -01, 12, 13, and 238- 341 -01. L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL APPROVE S -0 SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 84 -01 - MAVEN AVENUE VERLAY DISTRICT - An amendment to the industrial Specific Plan to expand the boundary of Subarea 7 (Industrial Park category) to include approximately 40 acres of land located on the west side of Haven Avenue, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Highway, in conjunction with the Haven Avenue Overlay District - APN 208 - 331 -019 125 13 and 208 - 341 -01. APPROVED 5 -0 LS. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8486 - LAZA DE LA h%A qC LTD - A division of 34.2 acres of land into 4 parcels ui the industrial Park District (Subarea 6) located on the southwest corner of Arrow and Haven - APN 209 -092 -04. VL New Business APPROVED 5 -0 N. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84-51 - RETfER - The development of four office buildings totaling 76,512 square feet on 5.68 acres of land in the Industrial Park (Subarea 6) and Haven Avenue Overlay Districts at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and 7th Street - APN 209- 401 -13. Planning Commission Agenda December 12, 1884 Page 4 APPROVED 5 -0 O. aaa.. an ry ax- u - uni'tzmmi. wZndtyllW - brie oeveloprnent of a 580,000 square foot warehouse/ manufacturing building-, two 3 -story office buildings totaling 166,500 square feet, and a field measurement area (2.6 acres on 75 acres of ;and in the General Industrial District (Subarea 11) and Industrial Park District (Subarea 12) located between 4th and 6th Streets, and between Utica and Cleveland - APN 210 -081 -08 through 10. VII. Director's Reports APPROVED 5 -0 P. DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACTS 12238 AND (wall design as originally 12530 - CITATION BUILDERS -The development of 78 single proposed approved) tamily detached units on 18.5 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 du /ac), located on the west side of Heilman Avenue, north of Church Street. APPROVED 5 -0 11:00 i Q- -YM Public Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. I%. Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. `I C - F v 1977 JA K &.A H��c -.p� CITY OF r RANCHO CL;CAN10_ \GA PLrANTIVil"�TG C YLvaIISSIOT AGENDA. WEDNESDAY December 12, 1984 7:00 p.m. LIOM PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE RANCHO CUC ILMONGA, CAIMORNIA L Pledge of Allegiance I1ltW*x, iK *n il Commissioner Barker Commissioner Chitiea Commissioner McNiel IV. Consent Cale ular Commissioner Rempel Commissioner Stout The fort leing Consent Calendar items are expeCted to be routine and non-controversiai. They will be acted tvc by ece Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone 1=4 mio7m over any item, ft should be removed for discussion. A. rmymw 854-45 - nuirtiaanijbN - 7'ne aevelopment or a 43,009 square oot industrial building on 2 acres of land in the General Industrial/Rail Served District (Euba."?A 5) lm�ate.l at 9571 8th Street, east of Cottage Avenue - APN 209--' ''3 -05, 07 (portion). B. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 12091 - A3r LVAT - A proposal to develop 248 condominium units Cn 11.35 acres in the Medium -.high (14 -24 du/ac) Residential District .located at the northeast comer of 8t1: and Grove - APN 207 - 251 -029 032 13. C. DESIGN REVIEW &OR TENTATIVE TRACT 12801 - DEER CREEK - The development o-C 8'1 single amily detached dwelling units on 32.3 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 du/ae) located at the aautheast corner of Banyan Street and Carnelian Street - APN' 3062- 361 -01; 1062 - 371 -OL Planning Commission Agenda December 12, 1984 Page 2 _ V. PidAie Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by statbtg your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 "minutes per individual for each project. D. AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83 -07 CHPMTESON :An amendment to the conceptual plan or the Vz tnn gtia Dare Center, a business park consisting of office, commercial, restaurant and theater uses on 13.1 acres of land in the General Commercial District, located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boule -mrd and Haven Avenue - APN 1077- 401-01, 03. E. REVISIONS TO PARCEL MAP 8303 - CHRISTESON - A change fkom 15 parcels to 11 parcels - A division on 13.1 acres in the General Commercial District (GC) located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue - APN 1077- 401 -019 03. F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84-22 - BENTSEN - The development of a 924 unit apartment complex, to be bunt in 3 phases, on about 58.3 acres located on the north side of Highland Avenue, east of Haven Avenue in the MH Development District - APN 202- 271-59, 60. G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8815 - A -M COMPANY - A division of 22.41 acres of land into 2 parcels in the Low Medium (4 -8 dulac) Development District, located on the west side of Beryl Street, south of 19th Street; - APN 202 -032 -309 31. H. ENVIRONME"LAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12830 - -M COMPANY - A proposed subdivision to create 103 residential lots on 21.41 acres in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4-8 du/ac) generally located on the west side of Beryl Avenue, north of Base Line Road - APN 202- 032 -30, 31. Punning Commission Agenda December 12, 1984 Page 3 L J. K. L. M. UVZAII&I 1JMJ.LUi.L - rlaluung ;,0JUC111551Ui1 P @VIVVV UL euV"V comments and recommendations of the Interim Development Policies for Haven Avenue between 4th S +reet and Foothill Boulevard. AlUrIA LP Mr.A 04- U'l-A - nt1v L1l tUVzV4Un V.A +wnll DISTRICT - A General Plan Amendment from O ice to Industrial Park for approximately 40 acres of land located on the west side of Haven Avenue, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Highway, in ronjunction with the Haven Avenue Overlay District - APN 208- 331 -01, 12, 13, and 208 - 341 -51. LLJ1`U lii - L1 LCVeLUP111r 1k 1/4lbG aL'L talucuuulcu' &&v... ;Office /Professional) to ISP (Industrial Specific Plan) for approximately 40 acres of land located on the west side of Haven Avenue, in conjunction with the Haven Avenue Overlay District - APN 208- 331 -01, 12, 13, and 208 - 341 -01. .lrr Larlli riAt%v A1V1 mj.Y1LP11 oY-U1 - ntf.nn n.naaVG OVERLAY DISTRICT - An amendment to the Industrial eci is Plan to expand the boundary of Subarea 7 (Industrial Park category) to include approximately 40 acres of land located on the west side of Haven Avenue, between Foothill Bouls--ara aae Arrow Highway, in conjunction with the Haven :venue Overlay District - APN 208- 331 -01, 12, 13 and 208 - 341 -01. located on 209 -092 -04. VL New Business 'AL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8486 - MA NCH LTD. - A division o 34.2 acres o e�in the du -trial Park District (Subarea 6) southwest corner of Arrow and Haven - APN N. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84-51 - REITE - The development of our office buildings totaling 76,512 square feet on 5.68 acres of land in the Industrial Park (Subarea 6) and Haven Avenue Overlay Diatricts at the northeast corner of Iiaven Avenue and 7th Street - APN 209 - 401 -13. Planning Commission Agenda O. •E December 12, 1984 l age A. ALV91:YY 64-4V - Ur-14ZAFaL UIV4kLlv11L:D - lne oeveLOpmenL UL a 580,00 square fcxA warehouse man • acturing building; two 3-story office buildings totaling 166,500 square feet, and a field measurement area (2.6 acres on 75 acres of land in the Generai Industrial District (Subarea 11) and Industrial ?ark District (Subarea 12) located between 4th and 6th Streets, and between Utica and Cleveland - APN 210 -081 -08 through 10. P. 1253U - UYEA"T1UN r1U LULUZ - 1 n aevelopmenL aL d bangle family detached units on 18.5 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2 -4 du/ac), located on the west side of Hellman Avenue, north of Church Street. Q. SIGN AMORTIZA77ON PROGRAM - HISTORICAL/ w . r�r..rrrti .�o.nnrswlrfr w LT VOL PULUe Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. items to be discussed here are Omgc which do not already appear on this agenda. UL Adjawnment The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an I1 P.M. , adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they s1mU be heard onLy with the consent of the Commission. ` 4 ONTf11p INNARAMOAL Aa r E E U. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 12, 1984 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FRONT: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DE 84 -45 nurunraRUC�1 - ine aevelopmenz of a 4 .j,uuu square foot indusiria-T building on 2 acres of land in the General Industrial /Rail Served District (Subarea 5) located at 9871 8th Street, east of Cottage Avenue APN 209 -193 -5 and 7. I. PROJECT AND SITE - DESCRIPTION: A. Aci:ion Requested: Issuance of a Negative Declaration B. Pur os�e: Construction of a 43,000 square foot industrial building served by rail. C. Location: 9871 8th Street, east of Cottage Avenue D. Parcel Size: 2 acres E. Existinq_Zcninq: General Industrial /Rail Served (Subarea 5) F. Existing Lan! Use: Industrial Park. vacant G. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:. North - Single Family Residential, Santa Fe Railroad, vacant; Low Residential District South - Industrial, vacant; General Industrial /Rail Served (Subarea 5) East - Winery, vacant single family residences; General Industrial /Rail Served (Subarea 5) West - Single Family Residential, Industrial, Vacant; General Industrial (Subarea 4), Genera: Industrial /Rail Served (Subarea 5) H. General Plan DeSi nations: Project Site - Genera Industrial /Raiff Served North - Low Residential - (2 -4 du /ac) South - General Industrial /Rail Served East - General Industrial /Rail Served West - General Industrial, General Industrial /Rail Served ITF9 A 1977; PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT December 12, 1984 DR 84-45 - Nofgaarden Page #2 I. Site Characteristics: The' project site is vacant and rough graded with no structures or significant vegetation. Street improver%,11ts for the entire industrial park on 8th Street have been completed with the exception of the easterly drive approach. H. ANALYSIS: A. General: The proposed development is the last phase of a muTiti- tenant industrial park which had been developed prior to the Industrial Area Specific Plan. The developer is requesting an environmental assessment for the construction of the proposed 43,000 square foot industrial building. This industrial building will be served by rail and is intended for a single tenant use. Access to the project shall be provided from 8th Street. S. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist and found no significant impacts en the environment as a result of this project. A copy uf Part II of the Environmental Checklist is attached for your review and consideration. Upon approval of a Negative Declaration, staff will grant final approval of the project based upon conditions recommended by the Design and Technical Review Committees. III. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised for Environmental Review in The Daily Report newspaper. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Based upon site analysis and the Initial Study, this project will not cause significant adverse impacts on the environment. It is recommended that the Commission issue a Negative Declaration for this project, DR 84 -45. ResXctfully submitted, stick gomez City Nl:.iner. )RG:NF:cv Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Exhibit "B" - Exhibit "C" - Erhibit "D" - Eahibit "E" - Initial Study, Location Map Detailed Site Plan an4 Grading Plan Conceptual Landscape Plan Elevations Floor Plan Part II fI -a LJ E. 0 C 0 c�� NORTH CITY OI' ITF-Nr. �- ®► RANCHO CUCAJ IO\GA TrrLE: (�_s�a MA PLANNING DI`rISION EYHIt3IT= °• � SCALE- - Ll- I i, s t I 1 1 t 1 a F' i 1 1 i e 1 1 1 1 I i 1 1 1 I t t ! t 1 1 1 1 I 1---- - - - - -1 1 I i 1 t � 6 ! 1 t 1 e 1 i 1 � � e 1 • • Da:� � i ! - s s 1 i 1 i 1 i � i 1 t 1 - i r�xmc -1 SLCG 'p' 1 t t Er Rte. -`j_ 1 itC L l CITY OF ITEM. z- A-t E PLANNING V;NrLqON C of SC-AU-,e--- NORTH in. f, f 11� f� Chi [mil f° c I� I� �1— M i _i u I 4 I 8 I F o o J � 00- Z U� E n LA CITY OF RA\.CHO CUCA�iVIONGA PULNIIININC, DIVISION r 1 V NURTH Til CITY OF RA\.CHO CUCA�iVIONGA PULNIIININC, DIVISION r 1 V NURTH CITY OF RANCHO CUCA`ONGA PART II - INITIAL STUDY ENVIRON;MNTAL CHECKLIST DATE: APPLICANT: FILING DaTE: .2.t i LOG NUMBER: rR r2�- PROJECT: s 260 /��MYSP� rrpr TiU7rJCTOii; • l+ 1/L7�. PROJECT LOCATION: W71 ,fmt : # 7 1. EINV IRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets). YES MAYBE NO 1. Soils and Geoloay. Will the proposal have significant results in: is a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in / geologic relationships? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or burial of the soil? V c. Change in topography or ground surface / contour intervals? �/ d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any potential increase in wind or water erosion of soils, affecting either oa or off site conditons? f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? h. An increase in the rate of extraction and /or use of any mineral resource? 2. Hydrology Will the proposal have significant results in: A -' Page 2 Flora. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change. in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or Huber of any species of plants? V/ V b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? A-9 - - YES MAYBE 290 a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction ® of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream channels? b. Charges in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any body of water? — e. Discharge into surface waters, or any alteration of surface water quality? f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? S. Change in the quantity of g- oundwaters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interference with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? % r. The reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for water ✓ public supplies? i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or seiches? _ _ % tr- 3. Air Quality. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Constant_ or periodic air emissions from mobile or indirect sources? Stationary sources? - — b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and/or interference with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? c. Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? 4. Biota Flora. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change. in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or Huber of any species of plants? V/ V b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? A-9 - - Page 3 YES MAYBE NO c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of plants into.an area? d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural / production? ✓ Fauna. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or numbers of any species of animals? V b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare o- endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or ` wildlife habitat? 5. Population. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Will the proposal alter the location., distri- bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of the human population of an area? b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 6. Socio- Economic Factors. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in local or rr,_ional Socio- economic characteristics, including economic or commercial diversity, tax rate, and property values? b. Will project costs be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax payers cr project users? 7. Land Use and Platninz Considerations. Will the proposal have significant results in? a. A substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? f b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, policies, or adopted plans of any governmental. entities? C. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of existing consumptive or non - consumptive / recreational opportunities? A-10 - Page 4 YcS MAYBE NO f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous noise levels? g• The creation of objectionable odors? Tt, b. An increase in light or glare? 8. Iransvortati2n, till the proposal have significant, results in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for new street construction? c. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? d. Substantial impact upon existing transporta- tion systems? e. Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of people and /or goods? _ f. AlterrZ.!.ons to or effects on present and potential water- borne, rail, mass trznsit or air traffic? ✓ g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? ✓ 9. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, / paleontological, and /or historical resources? 10. Health, Safety and Nuisa -Le Factors. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? / ✓/ b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? V c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances in the event of an accident? d. An increase in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? / e. Increase in existing noise levels? YL/ f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous noise levels? g• The creation of objectionable odors? Tt, b. An increase in light or glare? Page 6 YES MAYBE NO e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or +s carce natural resource? IG. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal coamunity, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory?✓ b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short -term, to the disadvantage cf long -term, environmental goals? (A short -term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long- �+ term impacts will endure well into the future).✓ c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, e and probable future projects). d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects / on h—r. beings, either directly or indirectly? _ IZ. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION' (i.e., of affirmative answers to the above questions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures). J%9;WI r4` AEA- Si�&Pr e_ — CilrY �A111 �� u.Jc�}A2anft'g' i III. DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial epaluation: I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significan: effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. _ I find that although the proposed project could hava a significant ! I effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect i� in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION L.ZLL BE PREPARED. QI find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the envirnment, and an ENVIRONMENT IMPACT REPORT is required. Date 11 2b -f Page 7 A -13 D r] CM OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 12, 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gom-iz, City Planner BY: John Meyer, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TIME EX'iENSIOK FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 12091 - SALVATI - A proposal to develop 248 condominium units on acres in the Medium Pigh (MH, 14 -24 du!ac) Development District located at the northeast corner of Grove and 8th Street. ;. BACKGROb'ND: The applicant, Mr. Dominic Saivati is requesting a one -year Time Extension for Tentative Tract 12041 as described above. The request is based on the applicant's continuing interest to develop the tract. The tract was originally approved by the Planning Commission at their meeting of January 12, 1983. It was initially approved for two years allowing for a possible two year extension. II. ANALYSIS: Staff has analyzed the proposed time extension with the development criteria outlined in the City's Development Cade. Based upon this review, the project meets the optional Residential Standards for the Medium -High District. III. RECOMMENDATION: Planning Division recommends an extension of one year. In granting the extension for a one year period, the Planning Commission is finding under Section 17.02.020C -7 that subdivisions and developments of property pursuant to a tentative tract map or tentative parcel r:, '7ich has been approved pursuant to the provisions of earli, - dinance of the City and which is in conflict with this ordinance may be continued and completed in accord with the provisions of the approval, provided ITEM B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 12091 - Salvati December 12, 1984 Page #2 11 it is completed within the time limit in effect at the time of its approval. The new expiration date will be January 12, 1987. Res�ctfully sub"ed, Rick Gomm City 'P1 anner �RG:JM:cv Attachments: Letter from Applicant Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Utilizatica Map Exhibit "C" - Zoning and General Plan Designations Exhibit "D" - Detailed Site Plans Exhibit "E" - Elevations Exhibit "F" - Floor Plans Exhibit "G" - Conceptual Landscape Plans Exhibit "H" - Perimeter Wall Minutes from January 12, 1983 Planning Cummission Meeting Standard Conditions Approving Resolution No. 83 -07 Resolution of Approval L J �- o-L E 4� November 12, 1984 CITY of RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ATTN: Rick Gomez Planning Director RE: Tract# 12091 Northeast corner Grove and 8th Rancho Cucamonga, CA Dear Mr. Gomez, Please accept this letter as my formal request to extend Tentative Tract No. 12091 for one (1) year commencing January 12, 1985. I am requesting this extension of time for the following reasons: A. The extraordinary time needed to process ti:e required approvals needed by the Railroad has delayed processing of the final plans. Railroad approval is still not forthcoming as of this date. B. The current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions in the area make it unreasorable to record the Tentative Tract Map at this time. Should you have any questions, please call Steve Wheatley at STEPHEN DANIELS COIV ERCIAL BROKERAGE, 980 -6868. Thank you. 9-2 Sincereli, Dominic Salvati, Applicant c c CI'T'Y C i IAINCHO CUCANIONGA PLAINNING DIVISION J6 '�/ U NOKM ITE.I :TU." o7-011 TITLE = EXHIBM *K - SCALE- 925. WE] 10 � c to] L L F-*,"J', ;A'. 0,'- T t Al rE NAWRAL FEATURES & SrrE UTLMMON R. NORTH CITY OF rrE%I- �T 6z:Rb RANCHO CUCATNIONCA T=: 3rcg MW PLANK LNra DrVMN EXHisrr: scAL.E- -UMS. ZONING -GENERAL PLAN Arrow �.......i id7� :::::� •• • �. � c. • • • • . e • • • • • icy � • • • • • • • • • c e••• a a e••• e ♦ e • • Y Y �' weeew•ee• • • • • e MJL� ®..V C A M C V NORTH CITY Of rrE.zt: RAi \CE--TO CUCAMO NGA TrrLE : PLAlii1VI \G I?FV'ISK?N ExlilMT- s - ! Sf old W d PROJECT SIABRARRY "1 a I 1 r.w_ ia.00m.�+.n.ee.i� 'w... '°� _•r —.0 _= iiSr —� �y+0 �i1T� .Y+.O�CTWI�Pr� ilk M�I��.V ♦ w.�C.-L� N(t �Y SfTt Kara CITY OF Rz�NC'IIO CUCN IO \GA PL.r1'L\�I\G MrISDN DD IN X� �i 11 : IL•� i J+ _ Al /I•Wa 1� W N r- )�E: D ` x CONDCMLJM RiOECT -D0W C WWL CWNM : aMOLS 1 DAMS ASSOf kIM - AAUCE= \J NORTH "1 a I 1 IN X� �i 11 : IL•� i J+ _ Al /I•Wa 1� W N r- )�E: D ` x CONDCMLJM RiOECT -D0W C WWL CWNM : aMOLS 1 DAMS ASSOf kIM - AAUCE= \J NORTH Y.. J .,\ 1 ' �, �,1, , 11 L IL � ,- 5'' ... c SME ELMAWN • . . w w SECTON Ar SITE ENTRY .. •iw��.0r1Yr M C HD VV ° D A COCONMM PRCUEa - ooajC SA[.VA?L OWN NOMAB a CAViS ASSOCIATcS — ARCWrECT "Okerw aw+ CITY OF 1 r L\1: TT 17I!i I rm. . at w' q) RANCHO CL CAMO\GA TITLE: MA:MOIS PP.... NNXNG DIIVISION EtfiiSlT --�C" SCNLF -- b immig a 9i. Z L _..MMMAL. - + YWJ I R 2M LEVEL FUM PLAM {"C CITY OF RANCHO CUCATMONGA PLANNING DINTS `•1 b I ll 1.1 MNIl ['L!'Yr ..rte A CONDOMf AN PROL:GT - DCM= MVAr OWNER A8 J: DAVIS ASSMATM - ARCMTECT +ra "a es+ ➢Tw-ll) L'P• x.82"' -1__ TITLE f =x? 'FLAMS EXHIMT:_E' _ SCALE. _ Wms . E i r W. a u' i 1 LAM)SCAPEl S.�._.� Ligr SITE LAMSCAPE MAN rsd'Rr� (t I° r-r�up CJ� D A tPFD&=- =mr- SAL.vnn owtAm Tto.ia 1 DAMS ASS=A7ES- ARLHSECT CITY OF ® RANCHO CLCATMONGA PLANNING M'SnN OW TITI..E: r ram�flre r ..u�v.� �w iy EXHIBIT= '° env SCALE. Kin- 7V� }]�V] y`ORd 11 —CONC. BLOCK wAL1 %qws i� {{ — wRO1xi+Tr mm !— CFeANG8 IN BLOCK 41, 1 WALL EEVAMON AT K AND E FL clxav+ au�vD y ✓ -mil J� L `'� • � "' ir._ ;jam JOC' Ti?AL 1 1� a.tEr X11 9 1 f�• T 0 l r CITY Y OF rrE,-%t: °TIZiOn 6Ey.s?-2gg RANCHO CUCAT-VIONGA -�, � Yom# �I,a� - rte+... 0 P[.Atv�vL1G DNtstol�t E�CI tttiiT _ sCAi E:_ _ X02 v CFeANG8 IN BLOCK 41, 1 WALL EEVAMON AT K AND E FL clxav+ au�vD y ✓ -mil J� L `'� • � "' ir._ ;jam JOC' Ti?AL 1 1� a.tEr X11 9 1 f�• T 0 l r CITY Y OF rrE,-%t: °TIZiOn 6Ey.s?-2gg RANCHO CUCAT-VIONGA -�, � Yom# �I,a� - rte+... 0 P[.Atv�vL1G DNtstol�t E�CI tttiiT _ sCAi E:_ _ X02 F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CUNDITIUNAL UziL rtkuwu.l" oc -co - ric��arvaan The development of a 180,056 square foot industrial building on 8.6 acres of land in the General Industrial Category (Subarea 8) located at the southeast corner of Maple Place and Elm Avenue. Senior Planner, Michael Vairin, reviewed the staff report and read into the record the standard conditions that would apply to this project, which had inadvertently been left out of the agenda packets, those being: A2, B1, B3, B4, B5, B8, D1, D2, D3, E1, E8, E12, H1, H2, H3, H5, P7, I1, 1-3, K1, K2, K4, N1, 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, M1, M4, 15, M6, M7, M8, M1i. Chairman King opened the public hearing. Mr. Jeff Gorden, 2501 Almond, Irvine, representing the applicant, stated he had no comments. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, to adopt Rsolution No. 83-04 approving Conditional Use Permit No. 82 -26. Planning Commission Minutes -9- ,- 13 January 12, 1983 0 i i ■ 3 H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 82-04 - SALVATT_ - A change of zone from M -1 (Limited I- 'anufacturing) to R -3 /PD (Multiple Family /Planned Development) and the development of 248 condominiums on 11.35 acres located at the northeast corner of 8th Street and Grove Avenue - APN 207- 251 -02, 03, 13. Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner, reviewed the staff report, stating that there are two items of concern with this project; traffic and safety. Further, that the Engineering Department, in order to mitigate these concerns, recommends that the deveioper widen Grove Avenue in front of the project to 8th Street to a 2 -lane road in each direction. Mr. Johnston stated that drainage is also a concern and that Paul Rougeau has amended the condtions of approval in the staff report. Mr. Johnston stated that a letter of opposition to this proj--et had been received in th= mail today. Paul Rougeau called to the Commission's attention the conditions of this project. Fe referred to item H which had been handed to the Commission changing the conditions, and Engineering Conditions k, 5, 6, and 7 which refer to drainage of the project. He indicated that condition 5 has been revised to delete it from the Resolution and clarifies what should be done to the drainage along Grove Avenue. Item 6 was also revised to further detail the work to be done on the railroad right -of -way. Item 9 was revised to further detail the means of handling the drainage on the eastern side of the site and which will give better control during the plan approval process which will fallow. Planning Commission Minutes -9- ,- 13 January 12, 1983 r (- . Commissioner Stout asked what the first condition means. Mr. Rougeau replied that it deals with the lay out of the pipes which indicates that drainage on Grove was to be taken straight doom south to Ontario. He stated further that the piles are silted up and must be graded properly to work. Commissioner Stout asked if this will take some coordination with Ontario. Mr. Rougeau replied that it will require permits from Ontario and it looks like the drainage structures in Ontario are adequate to take this water. Commissioner Stout asked if Ontario would consider this an improvement. Mr. Rougeau replied that he would think so. Commissioner Stout asked with respect to the block wall ar-d wrought iron use on the corner wall that separates this from the drive -in dairy if this is a masking type wall or something you can see through. Mr. Johnston stated that he would refer that question to the applicant. Chairman King opened the public hearing. Mr. Tom Davis, architect for the project, stated that this would be a continuation of the block wall on the north side of the property and will be screened. Commissioner Stout asked if they are intending to use the wrought iron treatment there so that they can see through. Mr. Davis replied that they will not. Mr. Vito deVito Francesco, P.O. Box 591, Ontario, representing owners to the east, stated that he is in favor of the project, wishes them good luck and hoped that they can start immediately. He indicated that the General Plan allowed a density of 14 -24 to the acre in this area and heard something different. He asked for clarification. Mr. Johnston rep3iad teat the zoning in this area does allow 14 -24 to the acre in this area. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Rempel stated that this project will improve the area. Rick Comez requested that the word curve in the Resolution be changed to read curb . Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by Rempel, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution 83 -07 approving the zone change from M -1 to R_$ /PDa Planning Commission Minutes -10- January 12, 1983 ,g_A/ ® Notion: Moved by Stout, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, to.adopt Resolution 83-06, approving Planned Development 82 -04 and issuing a Negative Declaration with the amendments as discussed to the condition:+. * f c t • I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS14EIT_AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12237 - WOODLAND PACIFIC - A custom lot residential development of 86 lots on 55.95 acres, located on the east side of Hermosa, north of Hillside in the R -1- 20,000 zone - APN 201-091-03, 16, 17, 23, 30. 36 and 38. Chairman King st=_pped down from discussion on this item due to a possible conflict of irtes-est. Michael Vairin, Senior Planner, reviewed the staff report. Commissioner Stout asked if there are would insure that after the homes are cut down the trees in this area. Mr. Vairin replied that there will be prevent that from happening. Vice Chairman Rempel opened the publi any provisions in the conditions that cneupied the neighbors don't go in and restrictions in the CCAR's that will c hearing. Mr. Richard Scott, applicant, indicated that there were two areas ..e had addressed earlier in the day with the Engineering Department. One was the joining of the ..lta Loma storm drain if their project is approved. He requested that the Commission allow them to dewater their site should the Alta Loma Channel project not be completed and provided the Commission with alternatives to the channel. The oth °r item was the request for sewer installation should some of the homeowners desire it. Further, that it currently is planned to be served by septic tanks and cess pools and he wished to negotiate this with the Cucamonga County Water District and the City and not be prevented from this by a condition of approval. W. Rougeau stared that this is entirely up to the Hater District. Further, that Mr. Scott thought the Commission might be concerned with water conservation. mr. . Rougeau replied that the decision to bring sewers up is up to the Cucamonga County Water District and the Chino Basin Municipal Water District. Mr. Scott stated their intention to join in the Storm Drain District and further stated that they have in process a higher density subdivision on this piece of property in the tentative stage. He indicated that it is their position that that tentative had been approved de facto in the past because of lack of action with the City not agreeing to this position; however, upon approval of this tract map with the legal time requirement, it is their intention to withdraw that prior project. He further indicated that documentation to this effect will be provided. Planning Commission Minutes _11_ January 12, 1983 p ^V.r d90 — dC O.£ u_TP Cq N pQ • �� C C C W q � O D l q A D 6 = O � � O ['_ V q C V J✓ N N C �. G YS .n Z `^ V T•w V 4 •O. w V�� V O O • r G C O` q 0 N d= V = C V N T ' C ^^ E 9 V 9 qV `SUq GVU 9 A 'C .V. 6D WG d. qq y ea C i N r V_ D q •Li. i V •. VCi .,N =.di. =DL YCIDD q �9 �JU Vd0 V —G ryp Gp> �O -9 O! —v � 7C >V DPq •.6 — Yv.'F�V'O p O! V O D N` T i O V V G.. -I i O G C d '• u C Y L G g r> D= Tw A Q V y1 b q E O O. 4 Y V q4'1 .-lN qN6 `NC Ni _ � C rn` V � r ..• +• _ Z _ NO.. NC q.+_J _VMG b_ �EGj qD„ 9�r VC VV —Z LO VNO i0-9 VEp �.�L- �� y6 4= aO '� .V plVCa uQGpR. d C _ .� O• D` V N •I" .i _ ✓. u N V V N L v W 9^ C q— i ��� 6 ^ —C �OV �G • d SaN VC_ �D VS.- C 9yGP9Yi G ^r PO AL NC. O A -k-2 9r ^C Q6 � Z�NN O�ui VVNJ �� Lq .j bV r90d NC < ve- = r Y n0 i -O i pC OZ NPV OG ��A rN i- Nr Ny -d+ X00 �C�t -.I `pI TVU p 6 NTG qC> PC 6�c y` • W` NF' •CU d0 T�"•q n a y >•� O d q? b .� C W u v u V q D •w V^p .^ y N �+ LG C� i �� 9 C N 6 i v N D V E ie � Y 9 V i' _q TO�NV q - N R` V 9~ W d O T^ V O m ^ ^ Y C r O L G P O y � rC MO Nqq <V JM96V P O.JD t4osG 6YGa t�O� 6a rV -a.rG. `.Cn • O N � Y •r + WE o qq yc.� q �a .`a ••u� ocao .- Ot TSN �'� a �.r rI d c o y6�•L Nu.. W y0� qV vGA CC N CC C A. O s� O q d 6 Y P C D 1 T y N—jP W vJi Gad • VCL y= W � VLG CV DGp 9 PEA 90.•Oi Iii y 3 d- O O T 'L r G a P C V q N �e ^ 6_ Y e'. p � V d�p A q —� ^ V V` G C> D^ .L.• C V ii � ~ Q �1 �@ T i R� q� '• O P � O g .� V �. Oti�o- •� iz V •� �� Q N V J �G =O C6 .A•g01 C Y• L ^N .�•J Mq i� Vw G Od C_ O y rCb Lr 69 V < y O N•. Nj 06 JA V i�J �6ila ;OE O 6V� <N —OV FQgm b �� •I iY LO i•�wIVT•> ' =( nC � O•V•UC LNG CA a•Liq 1�y_ �• V O C L N •L+ r i N^ �` O q � P n P' T �� N b L M > O N C O ° � O> O y� O g q^ �� q C d V_ � ✓ C_ s N q L a 9 D G � 6 O> e r O S✓ fy� i` E; O ✓ C. O P6 O r F= GY LrL ^y 9PU ^� Y~ NO 9 V9LJ.V � VCT d i ^ ✓Oia °V6 ^OL VOr dq •°-� C NV_Op. ��O• �° � ���rL O. VO?r >`L �� ^k! P �rON U3.O` N� >.•�C d _ V d O. d 9 j N✓ O O � L P q w✓i 9 d r A O O C n C V Cr •-PL 1 V � �M O ��.• V.r LnV V E A O N O C V n C 6 ^ = .„� ✓ n y L Q T E 9 r P N✓ V r � ✓�� .pLC NG L N b ' C✓ C A�4w fiy•�yY 9 ^O �� °d O J ✓��L ✓qp S Or_ O y S^ p L C✓O O pU r q E T 6 O V N T V ` L- V r V^ t'1 L✓ D O O V o V ✓ � p q_ � r Z� L P S 7� G O✓ 9 V O � r Z d r i O� ✓ q Cy V N ✓u• X 0 0 L� a� T L T' N U w d O P p V L_ •S a d V � w � � r A OE VL��L OL6 n= Y d^ A � d T` C V dpV `lOOd•� W w° F CV 1V Nw P q r N A O C p N O L q .w y^ � D• LOgV MyNV dG OU C N» .•dN � ON C ° ^�• °ldw AP�6rA O •-O q` ° 6c° O 4 r GPL V r b OG Gp 6 v A r•L � GS '^�rG q qV q�� 9 CrM V.V��•°i•�q G �wywB rV.�Lj rdN VL VVO.°r VNV ^O q)� �6TLL •Nn UN 9� 1LOV b4'I Nw4 d ar {�o.4n✓ MV_T• .Li•MO' P v G y 9 � ° a r m N s o N ° d L^ v ° ✓� p r' L L p L✓ O•r Ow••Li� i•L � ��'•C 6 GO^ � °r C r GW V ON ✓✓ OPy CGGO -� � O�Or Y�� �� Y �Y• 'r °G aA ✓> CG�yVC ✓ V V�✓� G^ N N G .. M Q C T G` �' l 2 W✓ �^ ✓ L ✓ r ✓ D l Y�ZW�G�O Z• £ VOO Y O•G^ Q 6 = VN 9 r0. ��L Od_ �ML90T•�•a r. w rLa° ^�b � ✓d dV0 ✓q , „LO Mw L N V• G ma y^ C Y N N L T <� N C � v < < V ^ V •°i, � L r < 6 q W d O C S ^ b y • �, wl o W ® N .d✓ e� - a = aooN d e ✓ 4^Gi• dr q r L'- t -. c° .-.dZ� bs"°' `ocnLpu �is•nv�NEu � pE N y w da..r L u d ° ✓Gy ° ^N.'. 2`reo� -d+ C j 9 T 4 L 7.6 G V 9 C'L `.^.r L N Y• V ^V .A ° yQ V a O N b 11 V r � ✓ V O r N �' 9 .� N P'e L� i ✓ O L qi u r � 4 w 0� 6 o a N� � n 0 4c �< � e a co•., V ^.�°c' -•✓ EEri. i °dicer '�^jV ✓ uL •nC a t wLa fV.L 6u• —'•V u S U T r• r N O k'. q 4 L N y V V✓ O �`= q a a V O d � O •r bG l �� . Z V G Y ✓ N O a^ 9 ^ a e^ t✓ r � V O � C� 6 L 1 d p O�i O M GG ° ^J_O Cy C OG J.•zN 9 9 r N Y O 9 V r^ •w V J Y V 9 C� G i V N M O 9 9 d O � � n 9 ✓ ^✓ T C w e 1. • N L w OSr...� _ � ^O F ✓ r p.r 4v ME LrGO✓ ..p ✓dO LOL � C rr �0 O VVj CM q �CUa N_ .C) 4dO !I S ✓_ =d S CE• VV✓ d r • gNE•Or• 6J^l. ^� � LNS��9 °0~.O G✓ N O 4l✓ ✓d61 O Nr. 9 N q „P Or QO y 05 •G C.� i__ 1 4P c�oc n' vow ... c.r. ^L` r Lg��.�'s.4r G v� °1• L toL ✓� a Lqr do yL LC L wL A✓ u•� MC qO 6. O � � O `Vy° y�vO wq.OA O ✓_ WOrA dV N .Grp iCVO� C✓ � q�M l�•r .r Sq C'JwL LyVj•Cy N Np .J •p ^r$ rp 2=5 cc L V > 1 L N d O C n 4 O N Z S • O 4 q q O` g O V O N P p w O O a N w V O C 1✓ p V �✓ J Y V r j N V C • O � V 4 V N V vi p ` p er N �� V q P� q✓ r „ V. C TPV.PV CZ � 09VC OCy4 V grcY�9COLe 1JJ V 6` • V = j 'J A P L ✓^ ^ L V ^`_= N .� G✓ V O � QO i r N I O 11 t 1 y ^ L V e 6 V C d B O O V U O✓ O M r V✓ r V• N C O __ y <<.Lit IJ °l N t`. W 4 rM OC •C ErO. LSCOL60\6�1N qNC ✓^ C w< •aL'o `` o'� d" �. � .v •� J ° i .C. •1 .J 9 u C V C G xaNV �' a ✓ s � == = `� ✓ 4 �L r.i � A `y a `� c T o T��4 a 9 Iv A EL.n �w OO VPy J G� q p N � � L q •9 r C' C _ t' V V 9 r U a O. •Y C k. L ` U i E O A `O _ E c � � V N a � � �y�, N` �✓ v c o i O J u A - V R_ L n✓o yr` G ov� N OG ✓qN V Np N j ✓ O- 4d VV p r•` ~Li c` ✓� iry NY0 O N` ^9 -pP T C Wi � �� .e✓ u` ma J .N_a .J � OG9 TNY�yA oC E` �� •. 90 „aw l` Lm ��L .L. A Pb A O C p YO _ c 2 C6' C P)V EO 6 O' __ N' qN� NN Cw V�'.- • nOLnL F qi LT UV PNO C_`q9 PP = A pp ^m V u9V dL O✓ N ?rc Jam_ `c{ p G A c^ CEdO cLtl Gnu � 6m ,, \)`1IC'vI C O • � N ` ` N � N \ \`/1f1 •i M° •°.r `L .: �J.L..„ .Ar i9e yG C < d P A V » m L C= �✓ O C M O- u Y w 9^ K � V< PS ^� V N G - a C L N V T d 0 p 0 v �✓ � pG L L V 9 4 r a V Z A✓ cEE10 ^_ ='� 00� pm �q •n Vr ..�} AP A 6� d � qa N V Ce J y � V � i b - L r V T9 N O`+ y� � ✓� e g 9 N �� � 9 i P A 6 L \✓ _ C a G q t 7 O> 9 N• 9 V . T 6 ^9 JL LVC ^ `q N�G. �GTw ^� �9 O'O p V QP•M L ��.•r V✓ gpVL V�� 6 vU_ aV✓ A9 GVP E.L•r V L_N N� O V S Y 9 O d 9 V ✓ G C A 9 !,:.5- q .... ` r N E ✓ ^^ �S y�N ✓ C =q . O�v YA 9r i 6 LiI J[N dA '1 _ NOCV o: c rns� b � ro€' b^ 4c qm a L A �� o ^^ =�_ `✓ wL om 0 9 0 � L V V t y P V O C ✓ QL� q V N= � P� � d L q p l C Lrgq 4NE � . •G Gy•L'• � P qC ^_ pN C ✓yy p� AVn N9` O NAiT ^64 CA�� Z9 C� V jT rNQ �VA O_ CEO A V M L O O d � a i w✓ 4F � U Oy. CNV V x sa L.^i,M c >�J9 N• nd �^ CM C m m 6Vf EyYU wG= Gc c`..� AL M� a` 9vb a ^o c acv +c Ltl O � O p P✓ _N O � m L V A O V 9 �L_ 0. U V O�-i G e`> y�r 49T 9Nw a VFn Vy Taq � G` + �^ O q Or a Y V y M N G A C •' T w _ ✓ ANN � Z W t O i C^ r V_ F m G 6 p b� T < ✓- A y V C g 6 V V riN _ V ^P_ ^pO O P ' CAG V ^V ✓ ! qv CY Jf .O A�4� `✓O -� C L OrG �L V LNNN.n _V V -Z Aa �M� AA VV Y •V ` N• �` V b � =+ C N ^= = b f O. C �� _ M (M^ < a � N Z N b V I. Ate• O 6 C V Q✓ M Q N N i i t- J L G i t T' Y n-I I 9, T O S a _ �• n V 1 a q ° r V P c V d 1 A j P f q L rw a e u °b n n V a A � L = W p l p MN < w _ C O P^ V O = w 0 a v •� d ° 6 d � 6 p G � C V v v « V yE� ^ c a D +p M L oov 5! D V i4 A M C P > � o O C C L v r d T L a en V O pPR W V V ca Y V O V 4a rnr� r a.+T Cam° �Ar• 9 L r v.pi m o,c �•. O F V A u iL. �v+ d J O Q 9 Y ^J A m y 9 J L G` Jr �W y C= C �w r C A Avya � O O V ^O.^ L V q n 6 a e ^ C ^ O A M L= CO« J L dCpn i' y>iyyN J^ e -`o L T+ O p j V V � b a o V V �- .. s o v c s V ^�V � r V v N 4 �Or O L r � V v �AEOo _qko ^ cco L o > •y. N >V u my <_ 7 L q •= l O � =e 9 C L 7 L lOp L O c- S O 0 0 > N d +dam 9 V L _ [ \np 9 d ` V J q qL ` Y ' d NL V C ° i a r C O N O r b d O bJ q > F G � L O L V O G r C q 1 G ^ v c L N C9 V^ u C y N J yr Lo O - LN ^ C =6@ y q QF p 9. uq• V V S L O C 1�9 q L O p w C1J r V^ N ^• q G C =VNp' yL0 w O� Pu V rnr� r a.+T Cam° �Ar• 9 L r v.pi m o,c �•. O F V A u iL. �v+ d J O Q 9 Y ^J A m y 9 J L G` Jr �W y C= C �w r C A Avya � O O V ^O.^ L V q n 6 a e ^ C ^ O A M L= CO« J L dCpn i' y>iyyN J^ e -`o L T+ O p j V V � b a o V V �- .. s o v c s V ^�V � r V v N 4 �Or O L r � V v �AEOo _qko ^ cco L o > •y. N >V u my <_ 7 L q •= l O � =e 9 C L 7 L lOp L O c- S O 0 0 > N d +dam 9 V L _ [ \np 9 d ` V J q qL ` Y ' d NL V C ° i a r C O N O r b d O bJ q > F G � L O L V O G r C q 1 G w O..2 y- c o N c P V �_r qra� V Pp r L ov « uAL» r m > > a �L P' n qc 9 i J G g N G yC` y T OV n N6V1YP � ^yLd OG9 NAT w� C ` V V P vr- vor c obc� a w y ^ F 9 — vc DCVO O — «Y O °C ]•`l 9 G ^ V bnY- ='Lr bL �v o¢rq 2 q L w c V N L q > Y O -vwII °p y G ^ ~p >ca�^ ew -rq -° q q N l V ^ r y O q q f N V 1 L P as c c v � n q O•J 1. O L N N L d c rO Nd r V a cL 6 pOy •_�q = ^ 9 q P � C T B V N o�< N� q� Off' P 0 C q V � n Y P P P C C 5z; Vz b P c T R �d uL. O O Y � L d ` C V a V � N P y F � ^ V m v oq — b A �I rl �I r; 9 d qa P� C � N � P m G J ^ > � a V d � •L./ f L ^ O O > y e d d C y E � L t L s ` C = q J • a Np V V P Q L— RAC L P v v 4 � 9 m V e o r � w d d � ^ P ^ cc M 6 o` u � ,e L L r n U V c O q i O O N n E + C G � M a � d T 7 _ b M MI Q V ^ C ^I M q u NO L i•1 iI q T N q O i G G O W► of �I u� �I P C 7 O C 0 M 4 M V S �* n da 1 NCJ ^ 9 Ap W V W O r V O O q O 0 D e° 3 b 6 q O c �e � a j L N � O � e�C O > P N 1 9 J 4 d Pd L � v Y Y 1' C Y V 6 C y q Lc V9N � F q a M N L � b q D q d • N q Q « C N P u ar VG1nT v P jam_ ^ P V a� V p + C NV C Cr. O 4 C J J L Q ^ p r � �mN 4 p 4 !� Ar u j d v < y N °tP yr Lo - ynL !.2�2 y•JL 9. uq• V V S V O .^ q L O p w q p 9 r V^ N ^• q G C =VNp' yL0 w Lod -LL�w n�a w O..2 y- c o N c P V �_r qra� V Pp r L ov « uAL» r m > > a �L P' n qc 9 i J G g N G yC` y T OV n N6V1YP � ^yLd OG9 NAT w� C ` V V P vr- vor c obc� a w y ^ F 9 — vc DCVO O — «Y O °C ]•`l 9 G ^ V bnY- ='Lr bL �v o¢rq 2 q L w c V N L q > Y O -vwII °p y G ^ ~p >ca�^ ew -rq -° q q N l V ^ r y O q q f N V 1 L P as c c v � n q O•J 1. O L N N L d c rO Nd r V a cL 6 pOy •_�q = ^ 9 q P � C T B V N o�< N� q� Off' P 0 C q V � n Y P P P C C 5z; Vz b P c T R �d uL. O O Y � L d ` C V a V � N P y F � ^ V m v oq — b A �I rl �I r; 9 d qa P� C � N � P m G J ^ > � a V d � •L./ f L ^ O O > y e d d C y E � L t L s ` C = q J • a Np V V P Q L— RAC L P v v 4 � 9 m V e o r � w d d � ^ P ^ cc M 6 o` u � ,e L L r n U V c O q i O O N n E + C G � M a � d T 7 _ b M MI Q V ^ C ^I M q u NO L i•1 iI q T N q O i G G O W► of �I u� �I P C 7 O C 0 M 4 M V S �* n da 1 NCJ ^ 9 Ap W V W O r V O O q O 0 D e° 3 b 6 q O c �e � a j L N � O � e�C O > P N 1 9 J 4 d Pd L � v Y Y 1' C Y V 6 C y q Lc V9N � F q a M N L � b q D q d • N q Q « C N P u ar VG1nT v P jam_ ^ P V a� V p + C NV C Cr. O 4 C J J L Q ^ p r � �mN 4 p 4 !� Ar ^� 1 �rj ��us c >•'9r =`ac .L°. c �oaa� c = O� V r N '� O C '�' y •� _ u V S O ' G • S_ l .n b n < 1 3qm �•° �_ �. �� r Nb V4•Lw 'a CTi Lj�U , � V c PC - -•• uC r � �� O n'S CN is J -_ u o� qa+L L .L.N Pea ria Vfx \ /�I`I' I ` CCy�D qr n�LQ` -+QCT g6C.y ([� `4E••� ° d� C 1 ! !1 1 y= r yW YC° Odder 4r T-E dLm m eN Ui�,l >I! tl_ -N ��490 aCGV pny �dVOr.Y 7a 6 6 1 ' I i• YrD Y° - W E n b L L y m j L 9 d C N " V y O G N e p C_ 1 v�aw OIyV '^V -O `w r P m77w VV ��L -W YOC'rr •T+L 6-J yW gV `b =CW 9N Cr N _T V u r N L L V x n V V Z �VZ ^ TN v ° C C C O' V 1 7 W V 6'J n = m `•Lj y-j n C i d 6 �= C 0 0 0 t 11 Y° V •-.. �= r - C N Y Z; f 9 6 SSS _ C I � r�C Lr •'n N .O =9 �![N~ L E � E C 9 d f° V G W 1.1 G •NU I _O 0 C 9 p YS OC•�• SL S-Jy �Y ° } °T i •' .I 1 w I o -C.L O �e r 9i qr cl = �.`..D- � � `U O- E 1 rl 1 e V O 6 0 I] r V c b c N E O O V C O C q O C v o L � L q ` V a ai c � 0 0 N N L� a z ^ Y N4 V yb O � N l L Y ba o^ vc +n H � = —z r 6 J d'� L 4 q`on V `• p V LD 6_ T Y< E J q N 4 � � e a c`� �= v Y C L ' p T L q a N V � T V V O �^ L r p ocN6 ^ a v L q v N r V w E 0 O V L G E al > o •+ L v < c v � C ^ q d M q ` C O.� OI tr � Y vl 6 d ,u r c a c r L a n a c � 4 r L Y V G O^ L C ` OUP ' —D_ N C V L H > d � e O N C G 6 4 Y r N O — u w° 4�co � c v ov a,d qGq ietT F � D L d L • O pv O4 ?D q°u i 6c G�Va M N! c M •• V 4r V � l� V O � Y � P N 6 • 2 "A O Zr TVCO gL04 � _ 9 NL r •— y C J V pO_ =� _ d O — _� N n Vq� r0 L�On r Vv M Y Y �- 1 T _ �� q qJ•T• �r ��60 OH••'0 � � w VG �d r {"� � C� V O P Y L g O _ y n_ Y L q G •/ V C c� d 2 —� Oi dn�—° +� =� q � Nq O. i OLD •-• ` s V'u 4yS� L•• L Y G= N V __ Y _ S r 4 r 1C O o N= r O E V d _ N rI r— 4 VN > d L9 P. S .•O. Jt Ur �N VN �VE V � 094 J 7 CC h , .0 —rI ..•7 G MO O� V� � OJN •� _ G _ P�rj Sy{ PV qV ._ +� V I r r � r •J r C t � � Y — C Y V Y O� qn N fC0 n•w •J 'b`� L+ `= \ \�A�j OI = GLG Vii JvVU fN N V Y- �1 �r•� Y � ` fj_ Jj �1 �O � �r� 43M 6NrL �N �•l•� �r `� 14� 6L 6C •>•�� OJ n� 1 \j � • \ ^y1 f ' A RESOLUTION NO. 83 -07 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT NAP NO. 12091 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12091, hereinafter "Map" .submitted by Dominic Salvati, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of Caiifornia, described as a residential subdivision for condominium purposes of 11.35 acres of land, located at the northeast corner of Grove Avenue and 8th Street into 3 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on January 12, 1983; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Comnission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 12091 and the Map thereof: (a) T,,e tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and'specific plans; (b) The design or improiements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; 'd) The design of cite subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (--1 The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public al, large, now of record, for access through or use of the property withili the proposed subdivision. 9-Q�- 0 L'J L E Resolution No. 83 -01 Page 2 (g) That this project the environment issued. r will not create adverse impacts on and a Negative Declaration is SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 12091, a copy of which is attached hereto, is herety approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standsrl Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. The perimeter wall adjacent to Sierra Madre Avenue and the alley s; +ail not exceed six feet (6') in height above the top of the curb. in addition, tine wall must be upgraded with design elements such as split face block, vertical columns, or an increased amount of wrought ir-on. The final design must be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. 2. For security purposes locking doors mu!.t be provided at the pedestrian entires into the subterranean garages; low level lighting must be p ovided along the perimeter jogging trail; and thorny shrub_ must be provided along the inside of the south perimeter wall. 3. The tot lot shall be provided with active play equipment and must he enclosed by fence or hedge. Details must be reviewed and yooroved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. ENGINEERING DIVISION 4. The Developer 30" C.M.P. s north of the Street. shall clean out 50e x 31° C.M.P.A. and r) that flows along Grove Avenue �rcm railroad shall continue south of Eighth 5. Developer shall reconstruct the existing drainage structure at 8th and Grove Avenue to restore the original cortimlity of Grove Avenue drainage to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 6. The developer shall clean out and pave the area from the project boundary to the railroad bridge to accept drainage from Sierra Madre Avenue and the project site to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Resolution No. 83 -01 Page 3 7. A permit from the AT &SF Railroad shall be required for all work performed in the railroad right -of -way. S. The Developer shall reconstruct and widen Grove Avenue frcm the project site to Eighth Street, and shall coordinate with AT &SF Railroad for the widening project at the railroad crossing. 9. The developer shall accept the drainage from the East /West Alley along the northern property line and Sierra Madre Avenue atid shall provide an acceptable means of disposal to the AT &SF Railroad bridge crossing by either acquiring a drainage easement or internally through the development to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. APPROVED AND AI)OPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1983. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ng ;_ CtyAnipmw sslon I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Comnissiar. of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamnga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of January, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIOliERS: STOUT, BARKER, MCNIEL, REMPEI_, KING NOES: COMMIS4 "ONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMIISSIONERS: NONE B �� 11 11 0 11 tai RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING THE TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 12091. WHEREAS, a request has been fled for a time extension for the above- described project, pursuant to Section 1.401.11.2; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above - described Tentative Tract 12091. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: A. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a distressed market climate for residential projects. B. That current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable to record the Tentative Tract 12091 at this time. C. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be consistsn t Nith the intent of the Development Code. D. That the granting of said time extension will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties -r improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: time extension for: Tract 12091 The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a Applicant Sal vat i Expiration January 12, 1937 APPROVED AND AD^PTED THIF 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO C:ICAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City if Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of December, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: $ -a 6 46 11 11 CITY OF N ANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 12, 1984 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Ric'- Gomez, City Planner BY: Dino Putrino, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW FOR RESIDENTIAL UNITS OF TENTATIVE TRACT - DEER CREEK - The development of 57 single family cached dwelling units on 32.3 arses of land in the Low Residential District (2 -4 du /ac) located at the southeast corner of Banyan Street and Carnelian Street - APN 1062- 361-01; 1062- 371 -01. 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Design approval of 97 single family homes. B. Purpose: Provide single family dwellings. C. Location: Southeast corner of Banyan Street and Carnelian try eet D. Parcel Size: Site acreage 32.3 acres; minimum lot size 8,150. E. Existing Zoning: Low Residential F. Existinq Land 'Use: Agricultural G. SurroundinnLand�Use and Zoning" North - Single Farm y R� esidential, Very Low Residential South - Single Family Residential, Alta Lorna Jr. High School, Low Residential East - Single Family Residential, Low Residential West - Single Family Residential, Low Residential H. General Plan Designations: 'froject Site - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) and proposed public school facility. North - Very Low Residential Hess than 2 du /ac) South - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac East - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) West - Single Family Residential, Low Residential ITEM C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 12801 - Deer Creek December 12, 1984 Page 2 E. I. Site Characteristics: The subject property is a rectangular shaped parce which maintains a continuous gradual downward slope from the northwest to the southeast. This property contains a lemon grove and two Eucalyptus windrows which would be removed. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is proposing one and two story units. The design of these units represents a contemporary style architecture -ith the roofing. The living area of these units range from 2,200 square feet to 2,750 square feet. The design and layout of the proposed units meets the standards and policies of the Development Code and General Plan. B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee has determined that the site plan, architecture, and landscaping meet the City's standards and design policies subject to the Resolution and Conditions of Approval. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the Development Code and General Plan. In addition, the proposed site and building designs, together with the recommended Conditions, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare. Iv. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the design of the residential units within Tentative Tract 2dO1 through adoption of the atta -ned Resolution with Conditions. Res , tf%kIly�subm�>�d, Rick �i�mez 1 City nn i ,RG:DP:ns (Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Siiq Plan Exhibit "B" - Elevateon Plans Exhibit "C" - Landscape Plan (to be Exhibited at Meeting) Resolution (? — 1 I y I , 8 .i�II.�� V I `� G li •I�IV 07 j j 1C ► ; to ` ..d = _t; _: dlo..11ll.ad 19._ I. ij • ' ' ! i 'mss i.— "am:asaaau � _ . - T_' _ j1._,r.+.ea.— Z7 I AWL 1p i 11• .. s t.' p I i7 � G � � � `% I •E7 -I x'71, ; cl ly A dl jll, �a�.��1V++a� -. F �r_..Gf`• .. r_ •. i` j 4 r , 1 I r i i 5 �01Z...T.: • •� . I y--_ a EL: a •'; z. •\ Sam i r r� 0 C.J Z M I � / 1 _ li r w•��... f F ild l r _ •' ` �(r S•M 1 1 ! T •. `f F _ - 17C CI m F _i rK Q z 6 u W, FM :J cn F-- 2 L Z J c.. r � C I� r_ u V r �r L_ Z 11 11 ,U s � s lot �� •jam ��� tttttt It I ➢F O 1 i 1,. .I 3 f A' f i Fl a (2-9 Vs o i r u 11 0 i r � rr. U r � +--� r✓ J n i 17 I WE L_ Z Z I I� I i .G r U ~� G fd u El- E E H L T .0 r, \1 J n r� J (2-1(1" f f V l 11 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT NO. 12801 LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BANYAN STREET AND CARNELIAN STREET IN TPC LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the ist day of November, 1984, a complete application was filed by peer Creek Company for review of the above- described project; and WHEREAS, on the 12th day of December, 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the zbove- described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following can be met: 1. The design and layout of the proposed development, together with the Conditions of Approval, is consistent with the applicable elements of the City's General Plan. 2. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the character of the surrounding Is area and will create a harmonious, orderly and attractive development. 6 3. The design of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting pjbiic as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic vse ins materials, ' xture and color and will remain aesttieticaliy aj,pealing and will retain a reasonable adequate level of maintenance. 4. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the Generac Plan. 5. That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the distract in which the site is located. 6. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 7. That 165e proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the V biic health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements ir the v'cinir�. e - A), Resolution No. Page 2 SECTION 2: That Design Review for Tract 12801 is approved subject to the following conditions and attached Standard Conditions: i. A detailed cul -de -sac street design, for the off - site stub street on Opal Street, shall be provided to the Cit; Engineer for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 2. A detailed wall 0sign, along Carnelian Street and Banyan Street, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 3. The front elevation architectural features and design, shall wrap around tha adjacent corners of all structures along the side elevations. This treatment concept shall be provided on all second story building elevations which are exposed to a public street. These plans shall be submitted to the City Planner for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 4. A detailed landscape an*! irrigation plan, including slope planting, shall be submitted to the City Planner for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 5. All of the above conditions shall be incorporated into the revised site plan and elevations and shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12th DAY OF DECEMBER, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMCIGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman A E. ILI Resolution No. Page 3 1, Rick Gomez, Deputy- Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of December, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ',C-/ Z u V d •r1 L d ! ✓: N_. °_.. rr ggoq _o !.._Q Npfr �a .ab ! =!� O C ^ 60Nq ° =C.�w 6 -rL A AfY .�'d 'N.N•!! 9p`� p�u 60-J V..9J0 � MO Pl y•.70� VN'_ LOVOL � 9-1 Oaa•- ..`.•' -. C N Vw Nq 6� qV rca bLp L ! q L;° - ° ✓ 9SLOT V 9 O _ Y ^ d0 Y y -rN• Ld� 'w q� ✓O O .W °y O .+ Y d+ O � O A� `� 6 j c � m 0 �✓ 6L ✓ fi e 0 1 R` 0 C �` •� _� a C � A a e P.0 G q b �� ��� S N . E 6 __ O! C^ C r o _ C Q A �- G NO °✓ __ �� �Y yy 9 =mod a co w � b E N N wN.. 6 a O .L.. � -J d �` 9 V a✓ G [p Jn �.0 L N Ly N .Oi S y _ _ E C C V y _! A� � ✓ C G O s N L p� G - p�ifd C I y _C7 qt Cq O- i0•� ✓_ dCef Of.. VO q =S L V ^'a SC VP L' ...r ! a pp V! N r W Aa.°.d"EU ^pN pL .L.o a� c coN�:c '_ E c.. •°.°..� s d N W p N d N p _ 9 u C O 9 N d ✓° O 4 A 9 C G r C b VLV V. C V O p'_f'Su_!�`- caiy8i �_°. fFk ocY cr ��< GO .2 °N O _C ry Y °AWNd V ¢O Vd rLn AM p d A Yy G O A a N • 9 Ny ✓ C �c:s I C =a �Cr Caw NqL p ^E� aOpq ON_L C� aq _ '00'G ^F! ail YfO dC C A.. P a YTS ^6^ P•p.�i' ^ L��N ^ryq -- -z' �GrO T- • ✓iOGY.L _ =UuO i�O Ai wq }pN5 �O✓ M`VpOO CrL� o _9 ! y V� f. L N✓_ ! L C ✓ E P i V O i f` � q. p V ^ a 9! N NdTOVt `5 ^^ O'C� Vy �jN ✓ YN` e° Y� j.n d�aV NA Y Ca .Lrf � y N{V, 6_ 6<SNl A3� � �OVG OGVY LN�L1 °O�°e OS OGa °_ yeC O a� �'L 6�QV 2 OL YG f0 11 - N, S J I .Nr ZM LY wC 1 fOr �V I O °.r ✓�� _V U _ G NQ AN DLO =N Jf f' � d f- 1 O ✓ y C Y � n� ' W 9L✓F q 6C `LSN�V^ !C� ^`�uGlO 1 - G° y 1 U ` u� VVYY .t •Cn -. .ia. ~ I11 Li �`.F+�M °� 1 � O. Gq _ Cw 6VQG °E,NO yV U AL-� A_ A 6d uV rr ✓° d Y J Cp � � O O '� � �� ✓_nCa Y V XI �as g ° e° rL,- ANY �pc °qoN d g° 7 a- f - .n1 �1 V 2 a� Q� Q i d 0 E 79 !•2 de oD O 6r r u'Y4 N N 9 « - C d O Z O -� O p`o P O r O ✓ ` J r d y r l N d C V y q a °oN •d.. V A C a L V L R- a ^ =c° G c° q NpJ GN C A �- u AMU -_ ✓ � a C n - ° u ✓ cv L u Z J 1 Pd f�a Sy T P O^ M O✓ ECE �a\doi y = -po '� L ✓ J 6 N ° a o i r ✓Nyvod�r O p:9 y Y Y✓ O 6 Jp'p„ d J Y O J G � •n 9 N � M •( [ 4 O L N O V^ r C 4 O y 4,- a MyE L Jam'•- �°cydN ^�E -ru �° r -✓ nv to r -crDO V V w G J l c�rV =NC b !;:5 O d a V- d C � V V ✓� � V L G?d- d } r L^ a° >.9 d Q a L d D d • n L r •� 6 a k r �• A O O L O O r A 0 f C - 2 to > a L ° T a P G a . ^ o u ✓ V N � C � M Oyr q r d V A E Lc ` yL +tee ACi nc. d L C P c N •Nil U, O d�NZ° J7c C A 1 r of CI ° ^I m d ✓ v .. u Lo« o atoy � �• q r u C >� y P« q n ° = V l ✓r_ A cAC ' «M 'UV_dC G C .• Y Gy " gi p ✓ a C O C t L r rc ` ar «o O - i_od ur Mcn+ «22 J y.Ni ^ p O ✓ Q✓ L ✓ L 6 E V A J✓ L L c_ O C M PpE c C C A O E y .• • t C _T L D dy Yve c s V A - r r °e± v ✓ N c � G N M0. P N 6 L L ✓^ L � C ✓ T J ON CAOc rte. 7 y O J d y O C N c c � ° _ P a A c r N r .c E j d O N A ° m a O ' ✓ d ao .L.. °.N+ ✓ cGM 9 r °'- o A O 4 e O N y^ O✓ A J 9 QrnO 6AL.m N �I G JLl r G g -c a' -•.:: cq A v <N�o oc.i:� _ d c u N aa>.ta > o ue. ya LJC a•- > v` -'i z .2 N✓ V r c d V C b c I e J t y 0_ O V^ L � c LOLCO Gpi L n_G NP>: c9 V O.CNr ✓N •°u V_ =A fy 4 ✓ N •" C r T E E L b D A% L VW Lp � v o N =: y c u � YL• .co L` C y Q N 6 Y A ✓y L r A c`� c V 9 A° d D✓ N . J y c N � O� r �Q V � �O:L ✓>� �V 'wr A"L. O•"f «lrCi 6'A�y ACa Oy c O J -ut 60OV VC�N� ` d =00E O•.{i�w COA 6_ r0 7�a u y. POa •Ge ^T� �C C� N ✓P6p Ar ✓ �• C 6 E c� A L,°� V V O r V r� d L A G O V V L � i N ✓r_ g0•V'f n60 AO. L�CC��GP> V °�a N <� c -T6 _N �� Cr� CC N � �L.•� d ScOV r C�J 9V _ a.V >r P OOn °Ci N VC Amp °�Dy VN ' Gd rO °M p_ - >O J E C"iA CJ LC• WCrO7•n v C La ° N Vc JCr CO° tNH cr C:nP C dG O C2q �^E> n W O A V _c ° L ._. n t y. •' N QO V V L O N M n N N _T - G l G• S A A V G L ✓ N A '• r N 3 G C A O A -J T - V J C N M C c d< S O c V � Y �- C L r T f O �_ > ✓_ 0. V y L L_ L C 6 a Y C C A >�^ ✓�- S N r A .01 . T. y _ 9 V Vc q0'O - • ✓O.SO� CC r__ <J�V -� �E COST O.� C C�+O.c ^L qZJ J2 7N N✓S <'r y VrLN C °� \L A�W :a r? QJC E_ O - N ~ V -` C' C L✓ A N C Vr n 0� _ a - C O j . N C d 6'f• C ✓A A CV VOr 'VS OP OOC c ^G �D °de GJ VTL CPC G° c ✓O ✓ 9 ° LViL> y'^CC JO �° �✓ i� cN -r c- jO OYC- v y LOj O >` o �_ DA u • `E Yc Ai.A.. a •J- crf C H6 C� tiyY ��qr AYE p N9•cll <Y J�C O.V A� •Ji�YN CV R7 CGCO q Ci> P e^ y � CyE1 a L a u d r . vC a✓ /� o° n_ . V � 4 � OCV i a u 9 a > a u V r NVCCY PdG _ ^89 O gLZzR �rT ' P p N�>• y`M L _- rO^ �1qY ON 6 J^ O q _ ^ =P OT'YV�N' yi SMN=Cwq E t d� _ _ VCN O•" gOW d0 �'4. r y°• G p� Vr �� xo_g G�g99 >•r EO�O q9 VP�' q q+.. Lid° •�• ° 4� �LpgO i� Ce J •' O >O �V_EO& L � ACV q Np VLF^ +O ° N q 9 .• .. r o d J L qL n � x >. o + � as � €�� yJ o Lo.N° a�q dry ro x'• oN °c '^a°.. V�Q! G yN�l Lr C�QA JV °dP_.•- •' L Js• JVS rL.^ r V l� O�0 Cd b�NrN <^ d � rOd O P P �' l� V �. ! p V q V N J V r � �I p V • D U S q ` q yr cd bL v-•`oa z +� rc r —=�% =y.N.a vE °r c�N E by., r�r Lt •c g qyE � �c=,a N- .q ,NGp c J C i.av �� `r q O � � 6 " C •` d o r ^ N r r`i b y c+ .`, c E r erg G C " N_ L ' u V q i gj?dV M�Cr rlO 9t1 4•y'' .°•NV VV wM qV9 Oq+ �a� °q MG VLN gOr�J is.- L N E u wgdr V NY du wry O T L�I G NV q V E O r V d x" q P L! • Tr q O C+ 1r i y C u N N V ! ^ N' p 2,:; 1• E 2 N Pr C L' T °qC. VQJ O�JN ^ =q�° n V r Pr ° Crq •r qM yr V� r C� d V ° r N L r p O w .•! v Y� O d O E Y V N 2 JE J .• G L ^` q � L v 6�° r°i N. ) IL N 1^ C> yG V•+ a� V y �� O q y t! 7 l C C 6 y` V V u P b N L+ql � M' Gv°drc l°V�?K.72 � qpd•']o �r �>N O Vb C r.rA •d�!r lO Ho ��•' uqgv 4 O. y C N � N N L L N� O �` N✓ C O L L d B✓ V C �_ y q � + y` V Q (, V -• + 0 W -� j � C f C J 6 V !- r N O 6 T •r 0 q_ NI 1� I ml � U Gb •O y� Q L ! O 9 N Y� Y C L N V O y V 7 I C� r L. N a qrC Vl 9 66 > yf�af� � x 9}�� .°� O G` ° OO Vr OCA � � °q•°r q d s• i 0 N G r p N � _n N� .`.. r N ` .. O Yt' •e C•r S! ^C rL N C n � O V V q � •- R ^ N L � r L' q y N 9 G:.n '6r �. N V.` q M p-. u NL vV a•q ��N V G r0 dy, d r HdPOas ....0 G9 pq'• Vq wir NCO OC ^°C �� ��r ^Oqq Ny 00.4 w O.•, CgCU•V gy ML 6E J6 rC�'• d C 4 °U` P VO ._ OWN V C B 9 S 6 r° r_ V L= 6 V L L Y •cOO 'e a c qo. — x °u•"L.°c P> r "a V; vu� S- � N o 9 9 P �° •+ �� C.°i L s L`<.o^ fj L M J q y N •4iau � y C V C d T r + G C ! V n _ cv> nLn A•.+_ drN c 4u - o Hj Y = r a IoW qi G '^ 7E vev '•Pc, °',� rc A.L•N n r c e eya; car ° ea ouscc[ y c•.e VJ.°- `o • a � �rrr�+ lG, u �� -. .J�. gLOO� '•> ^ = -d.°� r E r c♦ y 6C q r o L w� Carr � q � ! O 6 C C 6 'C O � Cd < O 4 C �4 ! ! [• LV .°. L`y_Nd� P _Cq C Nr G N A v O` V V° Y r V O` L•� V C -, u W~ 6 >pO C V L= C O y •^ O C J 9 C O T a 6 C G q J Gyy G L„ C= pp Y E y 0 O O V P q ¢ �' q L d g l q� � F d 4 _ L� s• O O y= C� uV M 7N P•Yid° d9L OL C +.N C94 OY� >MS °6sC 4 CN tia r_t° gLC•r ^+AYE `C ��� YO _ gO�NV LWC�O y V V V O 6Z Ogf•,l ^r NC „4 r�F �'LMO r_ s•O CYq Yd N�cc OVDrEq _� q- ` 6^ a N • tY JVV•FiVq�Olr� tiwL •7i•L rC qr qy Y R7 a z y U d O i d 9 C ° cv gda q V L V q rn4uMN • y N O V &72 - C w O♦ q L � M1• L C -� L 3 L L P i ;pc�4an ^q••'NP V V •� d d y E q q Cd V �' rc;e L _ � q q ? -oY u ♦-n iq� 0 V N N d P C O � P V ♦r Nqu C ` ` � d O uP♦ 3�8 N O N N - ^ ^rLiV aLi QV12Nd V 0 ��ac ct P c .Lp L a -LT c ^ dr `cs de. _ NL �o o cn y � -t cP,q _< _ _O P ♦" C` V 9 r0♦CCL p ° O C r C' O L �. O 00. qL G.`. n a L q -= q -q�4 qd .° E p u L t N L O c <" N 4' Lo O 2 G 6 n L O. q L `•° q c 9 O O L L •J 9 aw € 9 C C! O V O C w ; V yV♦ L Y q d U o G t ` ^10C ova°.♦$ Y p .oa' -O� =nv3 ` I .j V °� `2 °$ a - �- p1 S - w V.e .c. NJ° Y ♦'i♦ i y L ? V p A 4 9 E - G I N u q N L= O ♦r O N V>.i•. rV3 dCV uN9 p I <v 79:5 � .jq T N 0 .2 �c � a♦+� -TLS qy� a NNr o �q ♦Vi♦ - ., qV ` �••, _P Tc >- - ° a - ,a cc arc e- v•a rd i,o° qJ'. _ q °y= pwa _Y,roN Nae N c _uL > N^ iJw N9ga -tea �._. �v c Lc cc N C F u > � cry v`q•ad°� o da. O� rN - O n € - q ` O ♦A �„ T r0 O C y O C q i •� L q �N a` 6G _ � ^7r •L.r -Pr tO.0 rLi � �q ww = LCr �_C N �L S� 'y u� N= '. Z- n•L G q.�fi VICN Vr ^CUC LC �q OV O _C Cnu 9v Q< OV Si �' pu o``O Ld�r rL uG� =�c j �. p w7. �FOy �0=�♦n p >♦♦.V Pd C9`O y -y HCq L ONu iXl NLN N�2C =`Pi- w L C OM q P V gLdE G M rOr d O q • O O >♦� y � � u P °.�j q e Cam• N O V � ->� d 4�1� ♦CLV♦r V < 9 L ' <� n p Cy'� T CN•-. 'u q P °qua dP0 CN .Ct'°u �6N rfr CC�r pd _"♦C'C o < d�c0 dt0 T q- TJ 'V gq?Ly O` ga0i d vVi g Y' d gOTV uTdq� Ca L N`q =CVV♦ r0.2C „V g OqV� ON �•d aOC VO•L V 9r'V N♦- i♦OLPS qV V =dL QLV O �. p N M -N q d . q C a C g 3♦ = -"Xc q q° L 9 • 6 C - r q d N” C i0 r V w w Oi A q- i _> d "'W d�� .t.♦ M C NOV�4 _-tOVVq •"•� Od9 -L -�rc • v_W2 d piCO Y 4� Q T < ♦^ C O ♦y w L a t r d � <' L Y L Y a `^ m a O I 1 V do dd S_ acon dr `cs u`oc LO _ NL �o o cn y � -t cP,q _< c- d r0♦CCL CY•� p�vice ^ -4. `♦ • O L .O..L 00. qL G.`. n a NL.♦[6 q -= 6�°CpN -q�4 qd .° Pd qY N L g <" N 4' Lo O 2 G 6 n L O. L O L 1 `•° q c O� o- •'7 - a �- c Er Dyad V.e 09 6v a -_ - �c ic?> NFL v•« �'2 ^o FYt r ..a O N V>.i•. rV3 dCV uN9 p I V.Oi 79:5 � .jq �c � a♦+� -TLS qy� a NNr o �q ♦Vi♦ - ., qV ` �••, _P - ° m ,a G rqa - °N c - -ci �t ¢• $•� qJ'. N _uL > N^ 9 C C V 9 T C '� P N r V q< N C F u • d P 7� r C C M O r O� � 7 i - O n � t � - q ` O ♦A �„ T r0 O C y O C q i •� L q a` 6G _ rLi _7<< t 'V" °OIL P .V'' �_C N �L S� 'y u� N= '. Z- n•L G q.�fi VICN Vr ^CUC LC �q OV O _C Cnu 9v Q< OV Si �' pu o``O Ld�r Lit. PC ply r7N �wV. V� >♦♦.V qLt N� C9`O y -y HCq L qq N d C_uq ♦CLV♦r Z"•a. 6�V CN•-. 'u q ° 9 dP0 CN Lam- �6N rfr -Vr< d�c0 _c °CU•O T r» y0 ga0i Neu N G� <i Cq q">.Or♦�a -. E�� Y Ca L N`q . g OqV� ON �•d aOC VO•L V 9r'V N♦- i♦OLPS qV V =dL QLV O �. p N M -N q d . q C a C g Q q q° L 9 c O �•' = r• f.• Y 6 t S V N d O O♦ L O' V COV ♦Gi. C,y Srp CJ .� q r L -�rc • v_W2 Y 4� M O C < ♦^ C O ♦y w L a t r d � <' L Y L Y a `^ d -_ -_� d p $L ���_ °u d g �w�Ci m < v M H O N 6 U G p .F O N q < w ♦Y.c �d•L• 6 q < W Y Ji 1 V CI N C O ruN i `� �JC Cd VgyC��dr d CN CJ D -PV C 'O e• C V V q� N W yE E L .. O O m P C O U Y Li W 9 O CCC 21 =V C> 70GLy Wig' � N Cy `• f y= QL1 Z a. L cT6 a.- � Cpc v yr c LL Z(°i w. 2wVOiV4 9r.ri�r ° ON Li NT .V yTD a V r S O• C � S L Y a 9 .� d �� C a <�L• •9O 2i :� a �c �.v� D Eq .G.d - en LPL e y `dgOp P�W —V ` •9 =6 r NCNP TEN' [y .• 4 d E C .. O— ... v O G r L` Y L u T O< O C �I IV O.w C —G•T•W .9 VDV > >9 CY �± =d `V'nL .L°a0 .�C•. C r Dv W VN T.°.r O'•Cr9 ... P tL T.L. V Py G V _LqV OO N•�o �I 4y v ai`Wd ypS M UL NN .n .� (J� MOTy r _I N _01 VL G =6 •B —Z _ VC SO V rCC� N V NV 6 •dn ...0 P ^p C4 �C4 9 V O r I V _.L. —I .W� V _ = V v N C L N` N C d q 0 ri =gip Y 6 • P N ;; — y q` V � .0.. N -T _ d N L n J 6 D W N p N 4 V O W N p W V V =s p f iii \ \\ �i W� I NI �4I m r T a C L 4 •`" - 1. y r n a v y � v °' E Y 6c o d •� a° c •LJ >- G �5- -du � c V.L ` 9 lC DGS �• CCd C O_O2 _r C _CV aC6 L i nN Lc+i� e N Lue L° ry' 9 qC n0 Nr G0 G S N L C C ` •C'. Y M •S.. V V C° 4 ' u r. N L l✓ EG 6 V EE 12 V G> t _ 4 7z °— i C+ W C = O V O — V• D V L, yay C•> = .G..Ln ...0 rc2 F I• u 1I �PEOC Ted `Q cv V.p cv a V � Tc ` ° L N Nru a If .°.. ;FF Gnd p"u ."4 So mL =W CV L_a` <� o - -c-n �i•c ` v^ i7d a' ..ems c � cvL.do °i- a��r O C G G• v. _ n D N J. V I O. d r Q O N F 0 0 (. V WE 27= NSX O 'QNr Nom, CCI v .� E .Y_. 'JO4i N_.� V YV✓ O 90 ... •J E y= �W z.o� ° 4� �� cry2u � uu aNO e•c HC� e,. ` L ' <6� Or C WV LI i]I 6V•VnV �A rZ nr 6 I I I i Si1r VTi6 r7+0i V _rP Q u v • 9 V ' nJ — d O � y V V y _ N q I P V V Le V N 1` aA N C ji yN {` °.•n N .t.. Y P Q• 6 V L y P O N O !i � L Y O y V a d O L •" S `.r V = � L D. V T O n L O ' I I Y S N•( Q CF c c c Cr F•drWGS 9 yy V6 dV + SCV C iu ..i Ly o Y Rq P vcov °> dt.e g 2= e•- q V •J I Cr6 � V > O__ S6 i Gyq S .°rr q�S..0 E� V ' � 6FgrCrLN M"l�jQ NxU Nl� Vi YV Y' �C Oq V I -gVff VC O V YY 1' { N.LV ••TC V� V Ln L.. i I `Y I yN N t q V V L •'•N NV =PO .O A C° e •. l a V o • N Y _ 4°J t K K O.'Gp L l S .. s n Y i O i Z.5 N i V i V V� u V C t C i d L` GgYV •J7G M yV� �CjN V l7�' iQ V_ `K ~ 1 Vy 6q LLr 6ln 6Vr a.9 °� 60Y 4. q UgSVS- <L N � q V F• � •'� "'• N i ° q °+ C 5 a/ A HAS �_O.00C y N S E Si �� TC•O' LCNYq CL L �Vi •�+N O ^�7G P "un.,•P dP ° a cdJ °L iv�� :;N` P`oo °� �i —� — C K C OUr N r' .•C•p4L NCO �Y` °Pl Lr � DLO Gs. :: �m � : u —� `•lama �C1 a�� ° n np Cy.�uLq y aK° m L fNi NCO L C `Y• LoT y_�` .: c. P `VNO A d' _KO� p9ri NY Lff q ...•�'RNT� . Y SV= A� A� V p C'. C= 0 V �� ` M •....di. l �_ �� (� C y tr°. Vh V O GYf.S • KVr_..C� VVrC n�Vdr p dCI pN 0Y L .� y+AiQ1 Na.lO Crr Nq �n>i` v _O V N Vr C r L�Y = O 4G •C 'nY r `N..d O4 eV der �V �q N_ O �CNr Of ON9 °9LLl `�C Nom. yLVCE ° g >S O• S a q —SCOq Qp r —6 > n.LLy �✓ VN�V qT r pC gGp C `uC B.Ai• p °p P P C�a°. O d Mir S^ G Yi dr6r G I N G C� •=n — O— M� w, L V �_ V� N i N N PP V N� V I a N{ V A Vn qrP i Cd`. Vlq I V q_ C` _ 0 0 O V• y C M a b' M c V d °,� O° � tg V C g C •rn � Y_ q O O. � N q pP �C V JO �N nVSS �ONTgC P• P V r q N V V N� l K V O fJ n— ff� L V. p�° v 0 7 •` V r V �i }. 9 i O r V < O V V O P q = A t PV F•� � • • . NI SI Z 6 q P Y S C Sy • V � OO Cq W _ u v 11 KI CITY OF RANCHO CliCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 12, 1984 TO: C;e :,man and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Tim J. Beedle, Senior Planner SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83 -07 - CHRISTESON - Amendment to the concept plan o` the Virginia Dare Center, a business nark - nsisting of office, cummerciai, restaurant and theater use on approximately 13.1 acres of land, shown or4 the Development District Map as General Cormnecial, located at the northwest corner of Foothill and Haven Avenue - APN - 1077- 104 -01 and 03. Related File: Zone Change 83 -01. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: .+mend -gent of Conditional Use Permit 83 -07, approval of con:epturl master site plan. B. Purpose: Development of business park. C. Location: Northwest corner of Foothill and Haven, Exhibit. "A ". D. Parcel Size: 13.1 acres. E. Existing Zoning: General Commercial (3C). F. Existing Land Use: Abardore ' winery. G. Surrounding Land Use and 'art : North - Vacant, Industriani . Pork. South - Vacant, Office Professional. East - Vacant, Comn4ni :ity Cormercial. West - Vacant, General Commercial. H. Site Characteristics: Property is the former Garrett Winery site. Portions of the site have been regraded and substantial portions of the Garrett Winery have been removed in order to provide for restoration under the original concept plan. The site slopes at a n- grade.. The property sl4rrounds the General telephone facility at the southwest corner. Deer Creek Channel abuts the westerly property line. ITEM C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Conditional Use Permit 83 -07 - Christeson December 12, 1984 Page 2 E I. Applicable- Regulations• Revisions or modifications to an approved ConditionaT—Use Permit may be requested by the applicant, as set forth in Development Code Section 17.04.03. Special requests shall be processed in a public hearing before the Commission for their consideration. II. BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting a change of their site p an to provide for an 1,800 seat theater complex located at the northwest portion of the project site. This proposed use would replace what was formally shown as an office building. In addition:- changes in the land plan provide for two restaurants (and a fast fjod facility) adjacent to Haven Avenue. The changes in use, principally the theater, provide for considerably mere parking demand than what was formally shown under the original plan. It is necessary to consider a shared parking program under the new proposal consistent with the shared parking provisions in the Development Code. In addition, changes in the land plan have modified the amount of open plaza area from the original concept plan. Under the Conditional Use Permit 83 -07, approved by the Planning Commission on June 8, 1983 per Resolution 83 -79, the original site plan as shown in attached Exhibit "B", was subsequently amended to provide for development of the first phase. The revised site plan, shown on Exhibit "Cu, as attached to this report. III. ANALYSIS: A. General: The changes to the conceptual plan poiit to two issues which would need to be addressed: (1) The increased and overall parking demand, and (2) changes in the amount of open plaza areas. The applicant has pointed out, through documentation as shown in Exhibit "D ", that the peak operating hours of the movie theater differ from those of either the carmercial or office users. Under Section 1712.4, Subsection D, the City may consider a shared parking plan by the following: 1. That documentation shows no substantial conflict between principal hours of operation, 2. That requirement for the uses involved do not exceed the number of stalls reasonably anticipated to be available during different hours of operation, 3. That parking facilities designated for joint use shall not be located further than 300 feet, and ®— o;L PLANNING CDM-mISSION STAFF REPORT Conditional Use Permit 83 -07 - Christeson December 12, 1984 Page 3 4. That written agreement will be drawn to the satisfaction of the City Attorney and executed by ail parties concerning the continued availability of number of stalls for joint use. The plan provides for approximately 793 stalls which is adequate for all the parking demand of office and conmercial uses which is anticipated to have the highest demand during the peak time periods. The parking plan as providea by the applicant satisfies the conditions as set forth in the pvt,visions for shared parking. Future documentation on a joint agreement will be necessary from the applicant with the construction of the major development. To implement the conceptual parking plan, however, it will be necessary that the lard use mix that is shown on the conceptual plan does not substantially change in the future which would cause to intensify the parking demand either by the nature of the use or the hours of operation. In regards to the overall open space plaza areas, the applicant pointed uut that the site plan is conceptual and that the building pad locations can be further refined in Order to accommodate adequate provisions for ample open space plaza areas. B. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee was concerned that because the adjacent flood control land could not be purchased to be included in the overall Master Plan, a long term lease commitment with the Flood Control District would be necessary in order to assure availability of the land for parking. The applicant pointed out that the Flood Control District has offerred a lease option of up to fifty years for the land. C. Desi n Review Committee: The Design Review Committee conditions of approva or this project were to consider the following: Site Plan. Provide for implementation of a shared parking concept through: 1. Providing evidence for City review of the necessary parking exchange agreements for all uses. 2. Avoiding any increase of parking needs through either change of land use mix or modification of overall hours of operation from those nors^311y associated with the uses shown in the concept plan. .0'3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Conditional Use Permit 83 -07 - Christeson December 12, 1984 Page 4 3. Assure through agreement with the County Fiood Control District a long term agreement for use of the land on the Nest boundary of the site for a minimum of fifty years. 4. Provide for greater distribution of compact parking stalls which have now been shown along the west boundary line. 5. With further detailed individual site plans, assure for enhanced opportunity of pedestrian oriented features, specifically around the restaurant cluster adjacent to Haven Avenue. Landsca a Plan. Provide for conceptual landscape plan prior to the su mitta or approval of any individual site plans. Architecture. 1. Architectural statement for all remaining buildings should be compatible with the overall architectural program which has already been approved for the Virginia Dare office building. 2. Enhance iandscaping and architectural treatment program surrounding the future fast food restaurant will be necessary. D. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Commission issued a Negative Declaration for this project on June 8, 1983. No further action is required. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the Development Cade and the General Pian. The project will not cause detriment to t4 adjacent properties or cause significant environmental impacts. The proposed site plan design, together with the recommended conditions, is in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Development Code. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission support the Facts for Finding and Conditions of Approval through the adoption of the attached resolution. Re4ct`1utlubmitted, City Planner RG:T8:ns D -y �J PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Conditional Use Permit 83 -07 - Christeson December 12, 1984 Page 5 \J Attachments: Exhibit "A" Exhibit "8" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Planning Co Resolution E u - Location Map - Original Site Plan - Revised Site Plan - Parking Demand Calculations for Theater Complex ;mnission Staff Report - June B. 1983 0.5 ;`; it •;' ,�. ;c! 4 'r • i4 GIB 1►� = ` =�,_. OIIU ., � E Hlatlfl � �• � ���. -• 1■ ■11:1 iwww -.. "�.. uruirrunml . �� �. •nnnuun�s .jl � � /Ill /tl�!IIBp lIIIIIt�� n rrltt n■rrt -� , - trriilnnrr�rnr ���1111I11 prrrr/n� t� rrtt � •..•SII /ttt VV /tdtt/ � . ` len �/rrn uh1 ftsyo.. f Ci • . ■ • C a,. • I RANCHO • . TnE RANNINC DRrMN • .. a M S./ I \J 1], PARKING.' DATA PARKING REOUIREO .1. a 765- CARS OFFlCE�F]hANClAL (1!200),• RESTAURANT- DINING (7750) ` _ `'... _ .`,. 154 KnrCIlEH (1/_00) 1 PARKING -PROYIOEO (20%COMPACTi;' =.188. CARS 1 , i �I,III III ,I F 7 Ilu i BUILDING.: DATA .OFFICE � .�'.: ;: %..•.: , �. ` .r;,•" � �- SRAOC s! FINANCIAL • °'•_ _ --, >..:. :,: 18.v00 .,RESTAURANT.' 14,000. 430,000 st . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAN ONGA PLANT ENG DiVi MN v� FOOTHLL SOULEVARO N /O / \I�TY ( \ill rrENI:�� - TIn.E: U- , 1J L I I I HIM I ti - y �. �1L1tlli I u A/ /1';;II!!!•n I!li it err si 1 /�- �- � -�.' -i Ll' II e co, am Oft A i r: Ali; ii ICI111 n i�• I BI In mi G - OFF:CE/FI^C dW_lQ(o,'�y S.F. (1G:aR PER 25o y. =. RESTAURANT T?.9'A THEATERS AAaW S.F. Z.F. (1 CAF, PER ' 100 7.F UP Tc C,c S F THEN i :55j PARKING DATA PARKING REQUIRED: f - �EAII CAPS RESTAURANT RESTAURANT TOTAL TOTAL REQUIRED: 771: CARS PARKING PROVIDED: STANDARD (9x19) 507 COMPACT Mx16) CARS (INCLUDES ? GAR�sG� FAT F�p,�15LE� ^ 270 HANDICAPPED (14x19) ICo (35T) (2z) Y �i TOTAL PROVIDED: 7°13_ - NORTH CITY OF RANCHO CLCkNiC) \'GA Irtr�t: Rav_e5 I-Tr F: p SAT PUNNING Mr SI0 EXHt[3C% - scALE: I U h V O r0 p 6 U� 0 C° CE U P C7 cn t\ O CO to N > N 117 cn C t0 ti'1 lD O Y N I C\ co .^— r N n .N- 6011 G/ r co (Il C 4Y to N d C :.c) N n f7 to to %0 L7 n N � �,• } N G T `. c7 to 1 LJ U C.nC en L La., •� i U t� b Qt l0 CT n t� t7 lt') �.kix CD C� ni G .0 N lV tD I U h V O r0 p 6 U� 0 C° CE U P C7 cn t\ 01 N > d cn M q N I C\ co r N n .N- 6011 G/ r co (Il C 4Y to N d C :.c) N n f7 to to %0 L7 n N � �,• } T `. c7 to V � v LJ U C.nC en L La., C >{ C rG �N G G .0 [t U r U r to N N of 40 O O 01 t0 �C Q O tT) P7 [7 Ct q n 7 U O t0 t0 N to M to C.T. co /'7 r I U h V O r0 p 6 U� 0 C° CE U P T G/ (Il C 4Y to N O t0 :.c) N n f7 to to %0 L7 n N � �,• } T `. c7 to LJ U en L La., >{ C rG G [t Iv 7 U O 2`7 to N to M to C.T. co c �C O < C> cwt Q q Q\ of C C.; S71 L C 41 _ C N U O lu c .n d y Q a LLI Z N 3 C C Ct to f� 01 L7 CO q P1 9 .� Y L 91. 1 I' V U Z q O L'7 'C l0 N Q q Q r '+- G u 3 v 7U O r C L C O E O p G: cl M M C C C7 L L N 0 d CV Y E cm Q C tL r c a ti a c si a n a N c7 Q ttf t0 n q 0f Q C � C �- s. p p :+ ti CL N a M ei C c No n .,C ri f-. a n q pt I U h V O r0 p 6 U� 0 C° CE U P CITY OF RANCHO CUCPUTONGA STAFF REPORT yii n Iz u'1 L' I5 DATE: June 8, 1983 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dar. Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND 03 -ui - 6nx ukC3VN - ine aevelopment oT the Virginia Dare Center, a usiness park consisting of office, banking, and restaurant uses comprising 10 buildings on 13.1 acres of land in the A -1 zone (C -2 pending) located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue - APN 1077 - 401 -01, 03. Related File: Zone Change 83 -01 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Re uested: Conceptual approval of master site plan and gra ing plan B. Purpose: Development of business park, including partial restoration of Garrett Winery C. Location: Northwest corner of Foothill and Haven (Exhibit "A") 0. Parcel Size: 13.1 acres E. Existino Zoning: A -1 (Limited Agriculture) F. Existing Land Use: Abandoned Winery G. Surroundinq Land Use and Zonin North - Vacant; MR (Restricted Manufacturing) South - Vineyard; MR (Restricted Manufacturing) East - Vineyard; A -1 (Limited Agriculture) West - Vineyard; R -3 and A -1 H. General Plan De•:i nations: Project Site - Commercial North - Commercial South - Office East - Community Commerciai West - Commercial and Industrial Park IV -1 o Conditional Use fY Planning Commissi:,., June 3, 19833 Page 2 nit 83- 07 /Christeson Agenda I. Site Characteristics: Property is the former Garrett Winery site —' a t— por ion of which is designated as a historic landmark. Six buildings exist in deteriorating condition; land slopes southward at a 2 percent grade; property surrounds a General Telephone facility; a Eucalyptus windrow exists along Haven Avenue along with other mature trees throughout site; Deer Creek Channel abuts westerly project boundary. J. !pgpp�licabl�e RRee5ulations: The C -2 zone permits retail, inano icef' , and restaurant uses. Certain features of the Garrett Winery are designated as historic landmarks pursuant to Ordinance 70. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The master plan, Exhibit "B ", proposes 10 buildings, eig� ht o which will be connected by a pedestrian path with an overhead arbor. A model will be presented to illustrate how the main winery building will be preserved. Specific site plans and elevations will be required for development review prior to development of each building or phase. Access will be provided from Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard by a main interior loop road, and a secondary access point on Foothill at Deer Creek Channel. B. Design Committee: The Committee recommends approval of the master plan pllan so the following revisions: o The site plan should be revised to retain the full Regional Trail width along the east side of Deer Creek Channel per City Council adopted design standards (Resolution 81 -93) , and 5 -10 feet of landscaping between the trail and parking spaces. o The one -way access road located at the southeast corner of the project shall be screened with a combination of berming and landscaping. A vine covered arbor may be required if this road functions as a bank drive -thru facility. The applicant has provided sections through these areas, Exhibits "E" and "F", to address the Committee's concerns. C. Development Review Committee: In the past, it has been ommission policy to require landscape planters or tree wells approximtely every seven parking stalls to provide shade and ABIL visually break -up large expanses of parking areas. The General Plan contains the following tree planting guidelines (page 153): 1, Conditional Use F( Planning Commissibro June 8, 1983 Page 3 lit 83- 07 /Christeson Agenda "Strips between rows of parking stalls; planters should extend into a parking stall occasionally to break up the straight rows. Trees are to be planted i distance of 10' less than the tree's diameter at maturity on center. A suffic ert number of trees shall be planted such that when they are matured they will shade 50 percent of the parking area at solar noon on August 21 ;1 p.m. Dayiight Savings Timi). This entails, at a minimum, planting trees at the required spacing in all strips between parking stalls." Therefore, the Committee recommends that the site plan be revised accordingly, particularly along the westernmost row of stalls adjacent to Deer Creek Channel. D. Historic Preservation Commission: As shown on Exhibit "G", the site contains six bui dings, tree of which are designated as historic landmarks. A portion of the main building, the winery tower, and an auxiliary building will be preserved and /or restored. The proposal was presented to the Commission on May 5, 1983. The Commission set a public hearing for June 2, 1983. The Commission will forward their recommendation to the City Council. This approval is subject to approval by the City Council in accordance with Ordnance 70. E. Environmental Review: Based upon the Initial Study, the project -will not have a significant effect upon the environment because of the mitigation measures below: Impact: Reduction in absorption rates and increase in surface water runoff. Mitigation: Storm drains and inlet structures will be provided to safely divert water. Impact: Increase in traffic volumes on surrounding streets. Mitigation: Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard will be widened and fully improved; off- street parking areas will be provided. 11 L 'J 11 Conditional Use P( Planning Commission June 8, 1983 Page 4 Impact: Mitigation Impact: it 83- 07 /Christeson Agenda Alteration to historic resources. Structures designated as historic landmarks will be preserved and!or restored. Increase in existing noise levels. Mitigation: Construction activity is temporary and levels will returr, to acceptable levels after completion. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project, together with the Conditions of Approval, is consistent with the General Plan and applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordnance, and will not be detrimental to the public health or surrounding properties. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Daily Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against the project. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all material and input on this project. If after such consideration the Commission can support the facts for finding and conditions of approval, adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Resp � tful!,p�bmitted, 1' Rick Gome " City Planner 4G:DC:jr Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "8" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Illustrative Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Grading Plan Exhibit "E" - Haven Section Exhibit "F" - Deer Creek Channel Section Exhibit "G" - Designated Historic Landmarks In W al Study, Part I Resolution of Approval with Cond ±ions P� D w ..T c r ` y L q E d `c c o _ N u q u r - oo� d pV N Or V C O c a c O 6- r V V C O r V. O q N V � V w T N A � ° r O � V 6 r CL /G- P OG s O 0 a 0 O 0 e 0 N rN O V m 6 6 C u O k W W 0 > 6 1� 0 V J s N .. N 6 M JO + V O r O V � P q 9 9 r E g E L V y O .Li E g d' Nr M C C F 7 V y'Om d-E C V V + aL L C P V «° c oar u �-• i qrE d � C C v Ng' C + C L O = N 6 I q U 6 � 4 T� Ey Co E i - E Y O Y V Or� E y 9 V GO d L � N V S V r C E Pq O V +6 P C q G � 6 V A v � O q P C V N E 6 � � V C j O T 61D . o tE N � �j `6 d E N .L.TL d Vy Q O 9 G9 G 9 d�q V d 'Si H C L N~ 6 � y V O G D Q r N N CN q ` L > oL�c" C x° o M� � L V i r ° ag0"y J r 6 L 6 © -ry c 9� 6 V N � E C o� L c P O 6 V V G L. o s � V V C L O V q we C E > PO d C ea � E u= DO. d � r v �l W �i m + T n° 9 c O y 6 q Q p9 r 0 d p V P N cLv o L r q D P� L' c � rO `^ + a= c a y v L qL� -• a 4 C N > q � u a pr O N c c ac 'b" r + V d�O ¢ v e d L Ar _v 'w .o L - V V q a✓ t l A-� sA� r L p N d9� � q«O X00 V V q q+ O °nr o Py. L M qV r 6� q y G1E cv J n� =r D P x0.0 ON 6 N✓ C t N+ O V �i N v... c c a a9g 'J N NVr C V -• w L � C r L O S ro 2 Y V V V ` VCeV V g�N V p p > q = O M L 9 0 a c n c OC� w NO G c � H V CC La 4 s � O as 1i r 11 l F C9 9 u,t •"COC 9L0 LdC �• Ob OO OTC .� q q q. O V ✓ L q YiOV Fr 9+ T.'C eL pE �O� v ° N♦i •_ r V ym dr9 �DCq C � ° 9 ✓6 Cq ` Pa d0 �. ^+ N� V G ',CL P.Oi Y b +�lVL00 LJC� .ViN -a O N 9� iN DM.. L D•�KU��C Y^ N�aQ Va �L b- V •+N �.°. rc D ° Eo dwo rwi -c �.ca' >w .a= �° Nr,. Doi.r r._L yF u dy L -_ O- 'jd c qyS O _ l q 9.L., r a�0 >L y C qp �Z °W Cr.NV `y =•`^ Edr LA •ao ✓c q•'E .. J✓D O W+ maM OC Nd -Y VCq Ecy Q6 9 qLN PO.. F .�• -q .r` � d j OvgE r P c Z H i V C O - C 'v a C• L> L O C2 O N O F L9N V'J b- q P _E lY^ '6w ° C +G -aa w V .G. •V•L ° d L NN O.Y ✓Vy Y� r'� r0 � Vyd. Ni P- ✓d?�.� a .p .`.r 60 V d O • L- O M - F N � q E C ^. O G N r✓ y O +6 Ny�Li y O .Dn+p NV ZVV. -9Ly• cq «.s O aTP� N OE °jV V n q G O.O Lr N p� Ny qr i O V P • y Tr .GO yN`HL NC> =L L� pL y1Sq GV VOY (PC d C «'+ W 6D aN .� 6 rLMO N9N LY JYO PV9� P L g 4 L 6 t «SD 69�d O 0 e 0 N rN O V m 6 6 C u O k W W 0 > 6 1� 0 V J s N .. N 6 M JO + V O r O V � P q 9 9 r E g E L V y O .Li E g d' Nr M C C F 7 V y'Om d-E C V V + aL L C P V «° c oar u �-• i qrE d � C C v Ng' C + C L O = N 6 I q U 6 � 4 T� Ey Co E i - E Y O Y V Or� E y 9 V GO d L � N V S V r C E Pq O V +6 P C q G � 6 V A v � O q P C V N E 6 � � V C j O T 61D . o tE N � �j `6 d E N .L.TL d Vy Q O 9 G9 G 9 d�q V d 'Si H C L N~ 6 � y V O G D Q r N N CN q ` L > oL�c" C x° o M� � L V i r ° ag0"y J r 6 L 6 © -ry c 9� 6 V N � E C o� L c P O 6 V V G L. o s � V V C L O V q we C E > PO d C ea � E u= DO. d � r v �l W �i m + T n° 9 c O y 6 q Q p9 r 0 d p V P N cLv o L r q D P� L' c � rO `^ + a= c a y v L qL� -• a 4 C N > q � u a pr O N c c ac 'b" r + V d�O ¢ v e d L Ar _v 'w .o L - V V q a✓ t l A-� sA� r L p N d9� � q«O X00 V V q q+ O °nr o Py. L M qV r 6� q y G1E cv J n� =r D P x0.0 ON 6 N✓ C t N+ O V �i N v... c c a a9g 'J N NVr C V -• w L � C r L O S ro 2 Y V V V ` VCeV V g�N V p p > q = O M L 9 0 a c n c OC� w NO G c � H V CC La 4 s � O as 1i r 11 Y _ S_ 6rn - .�.. .2 2. =�< Lb = °l A •N-tlJ� N w;T rd 0 n 1 q -. V' N nmK n O rKV GL =ry a.P JO Kam^ N9A Lt K •� ^_ m N IY N O d d � LL n G � .� p.J. .r.. r i d N q d C V\ � {'•� V tSw` JJ � ^K dNN °R, S� � «N �u �On. Y.IJJJ MIy QCO q�KH O_ d 6r 6n / J'rJ NN- a M1� u0r � C •O N 9 w n V7 d ^^ c 9 N N N J L �. L 9 O r O Y N x '.� L N G .J•r'w -'C. JAL °..'1 �6A Olo wJ Aw�lO '• dA rte' -N LLN O,i R rb A r S M � j S yl Jam^ rNw NNS ^ -JV S SrS f-J 70�N7q N � >N p"Sd �'� A r A A^ O 7 S dJ • a d J 6 J 0 G r r � 0 e N SN V ONj C6N -N' 0° J� r.^LJy rrNTn.�.. y OSi O� ®�r NA N NIOG mSC ��W 6 f'd_ w�Pr �10 wry �Nq ^aS GJ G i 0• A 6 V J n �0 O r. r N � J N y C N^ N i J Pd0 4 n °r OdJ >O.i -S' b .rwAJ b OO nom, r �A LSl K yyjy�p r' r S� N O r P V 7` n� N r. S -.. P- N O G d 1~ d r •. w O 4� N r •C6» t�N'J rS Vl� q�l O A Y � A > f! J 6 � M 4 L w O C� l N q �..• d �p � • �� N dC J O.N C O'J D ; r�N J Qry06> N TO ;A -•��- SN N10 ON O_ J S d J 6 d Z W U 91 O d b G W O K I•d.... �N• 1O 0 ^ C p A ` t T J O O. r L ` q p C p 1 T 1 6 l�4 N Ai r S l J S N OK M T A O t i p O d c � r rP M A ^ t DNS + e J 3 n � O N 6M1s 6 n 9 J O � O b_ s M1 O Art N d ^n O d r A�np r J fJ - = w O _ K w � P + d nwR,vi o r06Of O r • r =� w6 r q n T d 6 N 9 q r q V A l J N q °r 'a n p 10.1 J ..•K � C L� - � v J O O oo °o N q • r q c N C qr ` d 6 2 G O ? ` w N y 2 H � C+1 r•� n m O ^ s �•K r n r Nj` n w � N r A N N 6 y i N r A P w N J A u ^i Ib 6 J G M �A Y J J d N � w A J O J .>n d ^ O � w L ; C �- .° n r .A r � r n K N N n � d n K O � J n O n S � r > P d A LO N S 6 n i 6 i �I r u � r .. c d Oo A y � i J O O O O O r N 'A A \_f A IV n O O > q �n l �K J w CGI O r6 r O N r 9 �N n m O 6 O) O? �dG 6 �+ � v a N O v • S O ,w ld a A 1 A h A q 3 � G ur y 9 6 +O O A C O O^ C - n I/ d � J°JO p N = 9 O O y. 0 9 d � _ i N Y � p bar ° wo G 9 S N G � « 1p A C PJVH K 00 w we a +wo q J S J N � �'i n°J• q 6 r 1 O A nS� p`^ N q L O Q' _O � � 7 O N O ry O N 7 O J •� Y N 0 r04 ^O-C O z O O? 'J JJ O zz g a JNJ�c^ b c�r nom" - < ,C Q=ZF -ILA 1r �=< O r0 < S_7 �t iO�Li4 ^f. J33 CO J•> 1 <�J Or Cd n•G'_ ^N J O n S'• ^� 4 L' •. f. ` N< 'l ? J r 4 A r V a^ N S � p N -br i3n JNn��JR _. _ n nom_` ^rY . N O ^_ ^ n' r!^ • N C i 'J 'J J ° r ^G �•;cn °� Nan °._ =.� CpJS _r o n'oc � � C .•. J C L i C b�J 1 GS °r O ?n JOb i�NJ n��JJ' SO A GLnn A r L ��Qj r L nfAb LC_l6 A �� SN � n �C•'C ^nl��3 �JA C'/YA Ndr n i SQ�O r bL �1J14•_aJ = ^Jpr� MO MO ^ N W�aA d d 27" A J r< •C J n J^ S^ A < <b d G^ O� • b Z 5 .�.. � d_ _ N G N00S r. 1r. •O ^n. O lR. •.Jn AO•c G S N A L 0 r r J P ^ IM S d � ,b A 6 ^ _ rn d C < � o mG �� .Z .4 L i = N � d r O = v ° r n 7 0 N � r A @ R `6 J > n •� L �N ^a b .- @ A l O SO 6 O 4 w r4 J =M O•� r JO. A 1 V @ ! b O N A fJi G A b � ^ O rC �_ A 4 L ^N � G � _ i C G � � vv L r 1 O r C _ A � R S� N rc 7 ^v Lb. Y N Y p 9 9 LL_ 6 cl ^ b• ^n j O j r 6 C j A y R ��C R a m ^' O r C Z b - 4 J <ov O N IJi O �p O J b b LO N = 9 4 � 6 C A ^p n n � M .• N r 1 .4.• N n O G J J j n a � n � o J 3 C N = � N J 1 M S G V G - < C R ^ OO � R = 4 Y V � @ n 3 O r t r d r A J C _O n O. w 3 7 Z n � 0 S Q b m 6 w 6 v 9 r n v 0 n G 1 S n °a 7 v ri S 9 ro 'o n_n_N b � 4Si fN� ` r v V SA 4 � � r � 3 R S R 6 3 d I! O �r S � R ,.v R � =A G O O ^ b n n o h r 1s J O tlLi a� o A J i a C ^ S C � O b l 0 ^ S A b O S O A P n ^ S T > 9 < v[ e < o O O A M1�.4.•J C �^ ZiO •'O _ 6 J 6 �6A � f GO O_ n <O n v= v.J..ry O < J � n GLN� F O < O 6 0 n n N S N ^ t O 6 l N p = ^N O ^y �LSA� Ci OOn O a O n A 6 O J O O r J ^Gw DAO'�JO ^N rC =y r O N O J_VJ AJYNCb� ��0� • `C ^ ^ ^ N r 4 L n- no 6 9 G n �G < 1 N ^i i n •ri• G 6�M N_�.A.7 r'OO r4_nJ C N N J C R A= O J .1 Ate^ ::.Z-. Jn46Or A ibL O•�OV ^bNO =^.9Y p � O R n O.0 �° ••• r.�0 n�06nrYr ^A6 bn n Qy A' JSC• C r v�C_O O N@ 0= w < N^ l ^ R O M @ _ � S L�Y1 O� N 1�NtG0 �O S r �YOAy 1 - � 1 I IV r r ' '�� Y Y N N••\ � 1' I t I Ilpn IC M b I 7 6 6 r r e ^ ^�F J l lY c D J ! b O N A fJi G A b � ^ O rC �_ A 4 L ^N � G � _ i C G � � vv L r 1 O r C _ A � R S� N rc 7 ^v Lb. Y N Y p 9 9 LL_ 6 cl ^ b• ^n j O j r 6 C j A y R ��C R a m ^' O r C Z b - 4 J <ov O N IJi O �p O J b b LO N = 9 4 � 6 C A ^p n n � M .• N r 1 .4.• N n O G J J j n a � n � o J 3 C N = � N J 1 M S G V G - < C R ^ OO � R = 4 Y V � @ n 3 O r t r d r A J C _O n O. w 3 7 Z n � 0 S Q b m 6 w 6 v 9 r n v 0 n G 1 S n °a 7 v ri S 9 ro 'o n_n_N b � 4Si fN� ` r v V SA 4 � � r � 3 R S R 6 3 d I! O �r S � R ,.v R � =A G O O ^ b n n o h r 1s J O tlLi a� o A J i a C ^ S C � O b l 0 ^ S A b O S O A P n ^ S T > 9 < v[ e < o O O A M1�.4.•J C �^ ZiO •'O _ 6 J 6 �6A � f GO O_ n <O n v= v.J..ry O < J � n GLN� F O < O 6 0 n n N S N ^ t O 6 l N p = ^N O ^y �LSA� Ci OOn O a O n A 6 O J O O r J ^Gw DAO'�JO ^N rC =y r O N O J_VJ AJYNCb� ��0� • `C ^ ^ ^ N r 4 L n- no 6 9 G n �G < 1 N ^i i n •ri• G 6�M N_�.A.7 r'OO r4_nJ C N N J C R A= O J .1 Ate^ ::.Z-. Jn46Or A ibL O•�OV ^bNO =^.9Y p � O R n O.0 �° ••• r.�0 n�06nrYr ^A6 bn n Qy A' JSC• C r v�C_O O N@ 0= w < N^ l ^ R O M @ _ � S L�Y1 O� N 1�NtG0 �O S r �YOAy 1 - \N` \� Q V o 0 S 11 a v C s V 4 C V i � O Q S q y >uJi a v? ° V 6 O.O ng ^ L e� L = r� O � G O Y M N L < o g VJ P < C P 7 < V P ° O L q o J � T q 4 a. e V O O'J y cd ` O r L ar O 0= j iPV nI O V r 7 r 00 C VS V yo_a Ux+ -JV - z Cr �= O� {Z V r V a0 64 r O n N � a y •' � C .cc o qc` CV" V Y O v O n r G O �o 3r 1 ✓1 G Pw o e 4 E e � t < °ad w O V _ 6 V v + - s c ' L Yq V y 6 r vO V S O c 8 y YoY D � -qJ a C N O a N Y N q L _ v < O S 1 L G _ •� E Y - V G a q C N C O L q V z a01i � q P i C l C VI z° v wuo VY PD'a v =Y c G r r - x w V a V O '�• Y " � L GPO pO.O r O l G O y O ••' O r y966 <� D c+lo r = r N G r ?• Y Y ]n p y l� .. o 0Q6 I.y •S G°> N O q p q�- °N < qG q L � C q rJ O 7 q r m c E E q L •J ° c� `o Y P ^ C N ` v 6i 0 0 q6 V r � g ` V nJi "o LJ,ce xV�r O L C q q - q V 5 <•C ^ V L f e ° 0v vim• t Z c^ J a T 77 _ C q twCL'^ o c G y V r Y u a C 6G N 1w C q V y y v L cam_' •LL J qr' Er �Y V eGgid 6 L N C cq L�a°J O C r 9 V C G q � w� >,r0 GOOa r.N c r = or L� y°io C O.V C J j 3 -3 o Z2 " J O cN`> C -r • qiD ^= G-JH � P O6�E�i �¢GG V ° l V G O =.J r �n Ir r Y C CY1 Y ° i xc NO • r N `w r V N V ` Y V L acr_ Pr - p C G j e Y . q :e- ^ • � _G V q 0 v O ° O V D M q if :I W "J G� � G v� <aoN qoM— r PU V�-J qPj •O.O r. C > C T O = 3 CL -rLq YJ L a= o l L v e N q Pr V M c ti • � ° 0 n c M r 5 Q � C y 1• NN ter- E a < O Y V O P q Y n.. O O 6 M L C V +_ V P V C � J "• m `J E _ q V L) q V - c G r ? r = a V Y 7 c � y C Ep V C N —Lv 3 6 Y L D � P O < U :o V V LL � O 72 s E � Y L L n� �j v e PL- = e 3 1�1 rn L n r Q `o L � L � c r � q k O C n C a � v r � � C V1 r n c c L � q V S OI = ^ q� 4 -I •I uI � L T O G C 7 7 9 - J Q.a m Q o - O < ° � w V 7 O q 9 G V r � D V O � V _ c q G p i � •J U ° �• c J V Y .°J i e• V PY L r ••' PO Y L 0 Y r V C y ^ vq u r V � � qeD 9 < Y7 J D q ^ C NN n C P: _ a >�OC- a,uns'. o _^ pV i� V •Pb G o � 7 V Y C . i Om N q q - q IN I. 1 L..( 6 � I - -j �y,-r- ✓ter •• wG Nj Vim•^ N J _ r I CQ•Oi 63= � E•OiV- N GV Cd 7nV a V' tz NJ I �I �! I I -yJ J' O•° qi •J J < ^�. •� C • r Or T = ± CN YS I V �yb ^v O.N qVj rN PepOU CV 26 y L9 9- �.-f 6 •r C r _ rL C6 •`I �, 4 CYyC ty`�a Cr6V ?V .fd rq0•.' y Sr • I I 1 {111 O �U • G cur q'nL yNO �[ J O O _ NY I �i �I � 1 y V °F 0. =�0` G EN E •Q b -• =O G V° a r U • L e l � C r i P N v a o a Z G n`4 .L T- G ��r tea'• va p= N/ ` I MVP •JLVV -`J O• ya P 4°°O� N_ lw ` � LV fGC�f. yd ?- Vl• G- ��rl�Yl YY �N +u ° yy ° V U I � C B O G L 6 =_ C � �_ �- 2 •� q �qw 3TNOZ l J -r sN - LSr� �° C•f 9_ Z Z. � f N •e e a � � o C O q b -a G i r LYNN N I PLC P `O• ON a Y V N L�� .� �. �• n Y� ° 6 u O � L C n � •^ M Pr � C L - p y FF O O O• � � V i� � y5G g V O 9 V 6 '� S N C � 5 r L W O` f.• O °Ga N a 1 S .� °• J O O V f Y N w c 76 � JV 9O `�N9 CO 6' CCC Y V I C�J VO4 =a =� r6 'J uy •L•= Oy zow .�..LII r W Y - • G O N ti aa. % _WJ .E `o_ `o - �> �. moo cr e V i r c z Z O V m V 6 2. •• - 1 G .j o V c 1. n _ Cy L •w G a E N d f rry = �IN NGd a2 N Ty O Ca Ur _ C o N r ft'�I I I a O •a �` 1 ` O T q U C� •" ` 'O ` i O r • _ - P I 6 T Cr0 I q 6 � i° O. b '- 6 5 �� NI r •• ` CO S� V y I _ »fir =w �PN . c a p e N N Vf 0 � Q' O• y � N 11 T- V ^ O �a y E Vf N - �p ry � yr LV `o' O V NO `u N O° Gri L V 9 q= L L c L V q l 9 oai aYri d - °y i ° L.d..uo a SL m 22 r� - ° ° aj q p _ N V e L ✓ 1 ^ q r U3r - CVLL GL C7 1 N 7 C� 9 _ ° �- O 6-•a i 3 N d r y 1 r 9 N. � 0• C ` V C iC 9 q V V- V Y D N C P p L 1 L Y q y ` N e y L V u p c c V P m t E C Y 9 O T N 4 G F V C J 9 L 603 _.. •f L 1'_J O� Y "]U L -r. 4� a '•p r ' <O.N 6 JS �Nr x•"` f� Cx <- » d N f N .D O] q ✓� - N N C Id RESOLUTION NO. 83 -79A A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING SITE PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW FOR PHASE I OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83 -07, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL AND HAVEN IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. WHEREAS, on the 6th day of January, 1984, a complete application was filed by the Christeson Development Company, applicant for the above - described project; and WHEREAS, the Design Review, Development Review and Grading Committees have reco :=ended approval of said project, with appropriate conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: Findings: 1. The design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with the applicable elements of the City's General Plan and any adopted architectural criteria for specialized area, such as designated historic districts, theme areas, boulevards, or planned developments. Aft 2. The design and layout of the proposed development will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or fiture developments, and will not create traffi,: or pedestrian hazards. 3. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by this Ordinance and the General Plan of the City. 4. The design of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture and color that will remain aesthetically appealing and will retain a reasonably adequate level of maintenance. Resolution 83 -79A E Ll BY: ATTEST: l SECTION 2: Conditions o£ Approval: Site Plan and Design Review for Phase 1 of CUP 83 -07 is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. All conditions of approval contained in Planning Commission Resolution 83 -79 shall apply. 2. Phase I construction shall include a parking lot for at least 112 parking spaces. 3. A uniform sign program for this development shall be submitted to the Planning Division for their review and dpprovai prier to issuance of building permits. 4. All roofing material shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to issuance of buiia"ing permits. i �. the tan the to pri exterior stucco paint color, consistent with existing buildings. A the Planning Division or to issuance of build color shall be a lighter the historic character of sample shall be submitted for review and approval ing permits. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1984. COMMISSION OF 76E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA S Li, stout, � na:rman i I, Rici Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution, was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning CoM. is3ion held on the 22nd day of February, 1984, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: C BARKER, REMPEL, JUAREZ, MCNIEL, STOUT NONE NONE to � ---) / RESOLUTIO.'I NO. 83 -79 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 83 -07 FOR 13.1 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL AND HAVEN IN THE A -1 ZONE (C -2 PENDING) WHEREAS, or the 7th day of April, 1983, a complete application was filed by Christeson Investment Co. for review of the above- described project; and WHEREAS, on the 8th day of June, 1983, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described project. follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga ?lannirg Commission resolved as SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, and the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed; and 2. That the proposed use, together with the coalitions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Regative Declaration is issued on June 8, 1983. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 83 -07 is approved subject to the following conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. This project includes structures designated as historic landmarks. Approval of the change of use, construction, demolition, relocation, or material change pursuant to Ordinance 70, Historic Preservation, shall be obtained prior to issuance of any building or demolition permit. 2. No demolition permit shall be issued for structures designated a historic landmarks, unless a building permit is concurrently issued. ,D- a a- Resolution :io. 1_33 -79 Page 2 3. That this approval is conc.^.ptual approval only and does not constitute app:ovai of any specific designs. Specific site plan and elevation shall be required for each phase of the project. 4. A consistent architectural theme, incorporating the mission style architecture associated with the historic Garrett 'Winery shall be utilized throughout the entire project. 5. All project entrances on Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue shall be designed with a special textured treatment, such as stamped concrete. In addition, a textured treatment shall be used in the pedestrian walkway underneath the arbor that runs through the site. 6. The use of Deer Creek Channel right- of-way shall not interfere with or obstruct the use of said right -of -way for regional trail purposes. Written approval from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District for the use of Deer Creek. Channel right- of -wav for parking and landscaping shall be submitted prior to issuance of grading or building permits. Failure to receive approval will require submittal of a revised site plan. 7. The arbors shall be planted with vines, and creeping varieties of vines or ivy shall be utilized against wail surfaces throughout the project reminiscent of the original winery. B. A parcel map or lot merger shall be recorded prior to issuance of building permits for subseauent phases. 9. Additional landscape la - * -r fingers shall be provided throughout the liar g areas, approximately every seven stalls, to provide a tree canopy for shade. 10. The Site Plan shall be r°visad to indicate a maximum one (P) foot car overha,l;g into planter areas, which would result in a curb -to -curl) dimension of 62 feet on a double - loaded two -way aisle. 11. The one -way access road located at the southeast corner of the project shall be screened with a combination of beraing and landscaping. A vine covered arbor may be required if this functions as a bank drive -thru facility. t r� ag sel3tion 1lo. 83 12. Revised Site Plan shall be t.ubmitted indicating retention of the full 30 -foot Regional Trail and a minimum,, 5 feet of landscaping between the Channel and the parking areas prior to issuance of grading or building permits. E'AGINEERING DIVJSION 13. Driveways on Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue shall be provided with deceleration lanes. 14. A lien agreement shall be executed for the future construction of the Haven Avenue median island. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JUNE, 1983. PLANNING COMMISSION OF-THE.,CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Herman Rempel, C airnan Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of June, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: STOUT, BARKER, JUAREZ, MCNIEL, REMPEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE i 0 O `v z n g C E O O u A O \ � G Q C � ZZIM i V � �f J m 6 N t 31 T O o_ W J 0 O tz ° NG c� ME; LI I N L C C �I V I W Y ° u V ° J I J rj `N N µ b V J F5 ( V V Oy O r d ° r Luo a GA G° v d o Lo r - W O V N � r L - O C G G O � 6 V dAm n =� � E c A P. L C V N °c ( q - ° V_ S C pL c CJ V C Y P N S 6 L C O L O V q t qc i= r C .+ u Qo L+s_ O q V ryry ' 6� d q N L N L E ° du c c °'r =o P C O U� ° o q � O 4 P G _ Q d C O �T P N d n L I V —qs T° ✓ '°W c 9 � �n4 vq >o V C q N� V nL. �Eg c L _ c o � G� O - U G . r N L � � =ou C ` O� C Ac nd d L .. i N O v c V + O u O. O N V d c L_ �a + G z o ad c� e ° V 9 s C G - � P iL v d- a 6 -d _ y w .aj d - T _ a A C O w n A G L A . :ae= q E O C S U > P N l C ^ C ✓ d L M N V- _ay a °Lo ^ G nL3 6 GN q } r O - O NC_ o - c Ur >C O• n- O L' V r N m D � O V L A Q V V + U V qG ✓� GTC or q" > G ✓ _ O Sf -V6I�n � q u O G N <v� M V 7 C J c r v M ` a• G Oj l 6 O q U + C - O c�� c yPL _ r C� y •J O 60 O.ri� G N r N 1 N /I J N 9 L C q O r N V r L � A .L.. p O = r Y 4a r ! A N q d yn q� iLr d + O r V C O L ? S O g y N O L O O V 6 ~ q C i GC- >'C _ r_ -G'C ~_ G l� •S -•J qrL _ _ � �+ � Or J On N _ - _ 2V q^ 6 - -a+ q C V q C y ° V V� .-. � q E 9 O N A` U > C G G G N O u- _- V G ^ j am q_ N V •... q 9= O �• V_ q_ ° _ N O6 ✓ L-'+ � O�U C.>.CP OS L -N q4 n•-• •7 Va >- I 9 OV _C •' 6d NJ W�w LOY. d _Vr "� P..• Ud =✓ ✓_ _LVjL9 �q�- r0r ✓� p V.. Ra rGNrG6 OA LPY j w� q .°.•C.`. °O C• L a= O •+-• G N_ ✓qU✓ O`O NJ:L 2: COq =G GW C'PW °� r J N.Li M d L�`N `r O•n =•N.. n GVi AO q T _� O�c 0'C✓ Td✓ ]�y O E N >f q _...• N y a Pi. �✓° TN r O d L d_ C 41 � •. L f d G E V O .0. •J ✓ V L y~ u C� Cp tqN >n.MV D �q� N6 LON O O)LL DL _ N`.r l V pC =C° r .Oi• wYY L N_VN C i0 A AOiT�L q V V _ '� yva <A6Ln 6N6a (9rm 6a 6N N Vl O P i 0 O `v z n g C E O O u A O \ � G Q C � ZZIM i V � �f J m 6 N t 31 T O o_ W J 0 O tz ° NG c� ME; LI I N L C C �I V I W Y ° u V ° J I J rj `N N µ b V J F5 ( V V Oy O r d ° r Luo a GA G° v d o Lo r - W O V N � r L - O C G G O � 6 V dAm n =� � E c A P. L C V N °c ( q - ° V_ S C pL c CJ V C Y P N S 6 L C O L O V q t qc i= r C .+ u Qo L+s_ O q V ryry ' 6� d q N L N L E ° du c c °'r =o P C O U� ° o q � O 4 P G _ Q d C O �T P N d n L I V —qs T° ✓ '°W c 9 � �n4 vq >o V C q N� V nL. �Eg c L _ c o � G� O - U G . r N L � � =ou C ` O� C Ac nd d L .. i N O v c V + O u O. O N V d c L_ �a + G z o ad c� e ° V 9 s C G - � P iL v d- a 6 -d _ y w .aj d - T _ a A C O w n A G L A . :ae= q E O C S U > P N l C ^ C ✓ d L M N V- _ay a °Lo ^ G nL3 6 GN q } r O - O NC_ o - c Ur >C O• n- O L' V r N m D � O V L A Q V V + U V qG ✓� GTC or q" > G ✓ _ O Sf -V6I�n � q u O G N <v� M V 7 C J c r v M ` a• G Oj l 6 O q U + C - O c�� c yPL _ r C� y •J O 60 O.ri� G N r N 1 N /I J N 9 L C q O r N V r L � A .L.. p O = r Y 4a r ! A N q d yn q� iLr d + O r V C O L ? S O g y N O L O O V 6 ~ q C i O n c q i M C C p V o _ ,coos ^ 9 V �I iIb % _ N <1 r' ( EL G O 9 C Y d rr C 9 G 4 _ 6 = r C n q � L L 6 J r d V q j V r �6C ' •O 7 L V l C J E C �n p p V Q y Q O V � 9 Cr V O L � q C V C= V G- d P J C U L ^ u = L G C - q � O � r r _ ' r � N L V O. f l NI q V V q _O 'C C C L � r C � O jz L C P� M L f n d- O L V _ ' 4 d c = d 6 i L G L ^ V i, C• �! y � O V C u C� Q j G O a�r�rr C_ O q 9 ` •' y c O C .. na Y mob a: C r q _ ' d ` V O .T L• aJl- r � rr�.0 a'O VrmCd - V90 G LO O C 9_ G G C7 C +' •J S r. L r u .d. nqd -L 4 d c� 4 r q D ca°p O�Z c- c cc o c O OLD OV�y C vi"". u- G Q r m p pl -I O n c q i M C C p V o _ ,coos ^ 9 V �I iIb % _ N <1 r' ( EL G O 9 C Y d rr C 9 G 4 _ 6 = r C n q � L L 6 J r d V q j V r �6C ' •O 7 L V l C J E C �n p p V Q y Q O V � 9 Cr V O L � q C V C= V G- d P J C U L ^ u = L G C - q � O � r r _ ' r � N L V O. f l NI q V V q _O 'C C C L � r C � O jz L C P� M L f n d- O L V _ ' 4 d c = d 6 i L G L G moC .. e ? D- - '_ � p y � i J c2 L O o V '- ' .T � n j c V _ .7 N� � - V � GL r � o° O � « c o � J ° e q • � .. r I J C- _ " _ i B . C6 VPy P e L C _ _ � r`_ ° u V? w L c q ` _ N E o u L r �L . �q C -u E 6 L u L ' b V n C . � G r ` n�L � CO n � vb _� � c .Ccr yo � � a _ r 7� 'E M G Ce M q r u .y.Jru C 7 _9 7 °C yoc° U q r y l .q c q v V � r rZI .LpO GE auda r .r c" . d � ° ry � C r ' P V C> o° ? C � O L q ae ✓I r ° V C P P Cd L b C N � r sV OG E u O -EE +C ' u6Oo V d b L � 1 .-P C ^ C N O<o\cn � 6 C d` I_ c cJ. P .' �. _ � G _ 9 amr.V du P C M"C VC V n c s.d r ' - . 7 �r- _ =� C `y C n +V_c - i °V -' Ee_ - • _ _= .r 1 y t�rmaCr u EV ury ro ._ .J OrV Gr « y L u C ` N o° ` V d r e.>L c ' ' ^ u � v _ -° O ' .0 r c - T c P J O ' W y .� L O •q = yS _G .r c iC E« O° .nL ' .0 r� My U e C.E P_ � •C r ._° o�w °�. c . _ .m g �, - r - yi .7 -- b�c i�.'..- +°'. n w � •� w o �r. ' cC � J � C l. = c = C «_ a_.i i N � C '_: G Q V `- VI udd CiEC i > l + p u P A_ w `vCO C ca� n i 6e_ sG � V "VV _ '° r .r � oG .= q JMo. . L o E c J w G =u q � _C ' ° u am G = u $ C � e q r i O . i 1 L m � C c V - O u � � -v .O 9 L J n PP'n 6 sj = -J P? 7i .3 C - +.5 r C O i 11 N p _ n _ ' - .L J r JO c O u- G Q r m p ,d « �� e ' r c = L t d � L i ^ o r ' � c M ' c M c o [ N , � , d q - i ' i p . _ � 7y P Ln O r T v U O _ i iwd'C � __ v �tr C C _ OC r L U i r_ 6 • _ N _ 6 � .° 7 11 N �r G t 1 y •1 COI rl hh G L M Q a. a gal ���QQQ \ \\ CI Y r ° q 6 q q O O O O > Gq C ° V 7 q c v O G v a w ^ N N ` �o c q o T � A v o O L O r l Y L C= UI ` W cl L of V S t C O ! N2 O n � L �• G j '• � J ^ J r r d S _ •r y •� l Y q d r ` V 1 VV cam. '7r •r� C O N ` q 4 _ 1 y a E S N u rTn L O j O O a BEd_ 6ed� of N o VrC Lu CG b'J _ oc r Mrdrr C p J ^ � d L V N d O rJir q --r V N � •^ e NSO rce G q 6 J W O d G G =^a= 6ccJ. Du q ^I �1 1 y •1 COI rl hh G L M Q a. a gal ���QQQ \ \\ CI Y r ° q 6 q q O O O O > Gq C ° V 7 q c v O G v a w ^ N N ` �o c q o T � A v o O L O r l Y L C= UI ` W cl L of V S 'NT �a C G � J y- O OC G 7 G i N � V c � O c U CG O J - V i q e =� � 7 6 � u v No, r q- CQ Y xrd T C •CO N a — � n P 6 j ••r ^ w N ^ V x T OY .O O, ^• T O N N Q 1 q -IJ 1V I- t 10 rl O y - I O d Ic V N Jr O a ,�' o c. T 4 -•.J e- 4TC`._ E ^ J n m�l�l G 'r C= ML.�gV = '^ rV rr-ir rrVaL rT 9q � � O�Q L6G 4 ° C'iSVr°.rdl O'J O..ru q M6 Y2� ryC V 7yq ^�40 bN O deON 1 fe rJ � 2 b4 % O w ^� ^ VNrJ =at L -j r-r. >o V L a�V = rfC CPC J•O. q 9 P� N q ^ ` C �^ d_ O `� d C 4T C C^_ 9 V q lr� � • a q .� CCU lbC ^ �y 6 `T' pU C'r �L POrN O CPjN U� + u V G S L_ G V• N O 1- q g C 7 6 r N ^ V C �' � O 7 O C.1 V � L- q P V O `• r n -"^_ O 7 N C- C 7 =.� J C G L O_ ° e o° C -' O^ -' n L _ E v 0 ° r c = G N ^' •' .Vi c' v^ 7 V c�T� °-_n O Nn0 GO -�1� L C•V Goa J '�^ �. Yr+ �' r£.vC �< ^!1 rV- 'SrPV N_r q Cs _ �'_ J V 4 •'O� C•n `�T uG� 1l VGTP`� + NNE +� ±V °V' q V =V �q LG -1 + r 6 GL •J -J- N CC r�N _ 6 V jGyV O K 4C ay4gN VPr °Tp G sir rGG �.Ny MN '.�3 Sy O�x�� N•� j9 4P GLGG - ^C d O b VwrJ rd^ �C CCrCO i C M Ce r V r 0 C � ^' Z G b ^ N 4 O M' M •O.r q q N -G6. mar - 6N� 4a 4N x✓•d ar <q 6 1 �7 C'1 j 1 ` n � � d S •r y •� l Y q d r ` VV cam. '7r •r� C O N E S N u rTn L O j O O a BEd_ 6ed� of C p J ^ � d L V N d O rJir q --r V N � •^ e NSO rce G q 6 J W O d G 'NT �a C G � J y- O OC G 7 G i N � V c � O c U CG O J - V i q e =� � 7 6 � u v No, r q- CQ Y xrd T C •CO N a — � n P 6 j ••r ^ w N ^ V x T OY .O O, ^• T O N N Q 1 q -IJ 1V I- t 10 rl O y - I O d Ic V N Jr O a ,�' o c. T 4 -•.J e- 4TC`._ E ^ J n m�l�l G 'r C= ML.�gV = '^ rV rr-ir rrVaL rT 9q � � O�Q L6G 4 ° C'iSVr°.rdl O'J O..ru q M6 Y2� ryC V 7yq ^�40 bN O deON 1 fe rJ � 2 b4 % O w ^� ^ VNrJ =at L -j r-r. >o V L a�V = rfC CPC J•O. q 9 P� N q ^ ` C �^ d_ O `� d C 4T C C^_ 9 V q lr� � • a q .� CCU lbC ^ �y 6 `T' pU C'r �L POrN O CPjN U� + u V G S L_ G V• N O 1- q g C 7 6 r N ^ V C �' � O 7 O C.1 V � L- q P V O `• r n -"^_ O 7 N C- C 7 =.� J C G L O_ ° e o° C -' O^ -' n L _ E v 0 ° r c = G N ^' •' .Vi c' v^ 7 V c�T� °-_n O Nn0 GO -�1� L C•V Goa J '�^ �. Yr+ �' r£.vC �< ^!1 rV- 'SrPV N_r q Cs _ �'_ J V 4 •'O� C•n `�T uG� 1l VGTP`� + NNE +� ±V °V' q V =V �q LG -1 + r 6 GL •J -J- N CC r�N _ 6 V jGyV O K 4C ay4gN VPr °Tp G sir rGG �.Ny MN '.�3 Sy O�x�� N•� j9 4P GLGG - ^C d O b VwrJ rd^ �C CCrCO i C M Ce r V r 0 C � ^' Z G b ^ N 4 O M' M •O.r q q N -G6. mar - 6N� 4a 4N x✓•d ar <q 6 1 �7 C'1 j 1 ` i - O V O C P ° p Y ,app r V d ^!`a z O r > R 'OO JJ O ° Low d�- ° N T - n M c'L a V > 6, nd�Q C = c Lrq c ~ E •, N O_ O q V r y O� c) O� u 7 g y r Z r V q - 0 -cu q - _�= y =tea = =� L°__- •J .-.j -_ i_ G r r P _ .ter 6. V ° � _ Z M.N • _ - d G r g O V 7 ` P S q i L r C •_ . •I - - r � V V C • 9G N - r r N P - - rL 60C.]rN 6� >�j d' �I � P W tJ °y r =~O VV at ��f 'rCi '-G7 rq cya q_Vy .r ..pi vJ Le Vy �O. .i� `as M L O. V -• L q - 6 V 0 O c E> ZC d Qr PdgC O ��JT LZ- �- =LL QOV G]Pq Q� QPV GVV.O 6 • q � y nl �I NI ° y - O V O C P ° p Y ,app r V d ^!`a z O r > R 'OO JJ O ° Low d�- ° N T - n M c'L a V > 6, nd�Q C = c Lrq c ~ E •, N O_ O q V r y O� c) NI f 6 T O P m T p O t1 a v' L YI lI n r G c " qc e T q L y C T I e„ V� d VI C C t � o O I Y q T l9 V -I ti � S o p O p Lr O� u 7 g y r Z r V q - 0 -cu q v 4`J[ TTJ. d 9 d �• q W i_ G r r P _ .ter 6. V ° � _ Z M.N • _ - L r g O V 7 ` P S q r g i d v •I V C • 9G N r r N P - - rL 60C.]rN 6� >�j d' �I NI f 6 T O P m T p O t1 a v' L YI lI n r G c " qc e T q L y C T I e„ V� d VI C C t � o O I Y q T l9 V -I ti � S o p O p Lr 0 - q y d v o V C • 9G N r r N P � P W tJ °y r =~O VV ��f 'rCi '-G7 rq cya q_Vy .r ..pi vJ Le Vy �O. .i� `as 0 f+ I � I �- a N - q q•-J P� t N c �^ 1 y N I I C O G - _ V Gr r _ m ' fv _ n w• `�1 i I pJj =� �J •U6 �V C �� y?`Lr V GN r LC.• � t`.T q.T•�V �iT �_ L w r �K I I W �L= l••. 4.y yV LI a__ `N Pqa -Vj0 q._ v Y � i � I I ^ W •S '` O q N N W L E r ° •r = jqV G�C1O' r C EC y _O � d9 w `per •.•V OUO �u U� Ur ` Ow 6i_ a �- V i i _\ �/ C6 _ T� rq - SJW =n O.. O. >•q�VaL.•L qY 9a L O tl6 I =_ q6C Sa Li.JJ 9wVC wC NG V.'• ^rOC wq u9 O. O T �NQS Wr na Nj VN WW;S _ - _ JII M 6MV V�^iW -NO vJiO O 4V 6- VwN \LV 20. V9 `J v lU ' P t L P ` P ✓ q N V°• p � O � I j - `� V `q N yM q T •Wi � 60 FN -J b N y/� q r• N Pp O L C V -Ct' _ - q •� C - r_ L pf...� � a m • O N C 9 Y O = n 6 y "°V_V Q 9�� CCa Oar `� OO C •rn ^l ^ S p o 0 o i i J''� =�> E�� •.O. o C� a P a� -' •Ni• >n 7F. NL T- r qIq L � �J_L• � OG G+ V nw4 ?� I I ' NdV C O.P GJ� Vdq 'v �� rI 0�1 U. -YPC\ •.a �°• qt � C �- V -C .•�.� �� �'i �N J�rJO �� Lp r_ V.r i `{v'v 1 • U- Oq l0 � � v 'i -J6 ^L T Vyr A V L W jI •e PN- C•'Jpr� Cr GP w� Y �'r _ CO r .a rW c' 0 O V O _ O = v 4 i O _ a `u 0 0 N � A� Nc' icv cJL q 9 v =r O ^ N v = 9 c r O � V r E ' y O � O j O G .Tj U6 t d O O L = u oN� � T Lq= Nw2 >O V J GrJ mac= < � N s .o ,i o•• c 9 O G L � u - T v r Y V c " O a r� L °I ni r 7 ' Ti C 0 O P ZE O .L.• y 7 _ N 5 N V u rl OI r d cl _ 'I V I � VI ^ V o � LG ¢I u( 0 0 0 d S r J 6 y v� � y oc v o d C ao No >r c a, c o N� ,ode = o W ` � Y O� y C o -= O M O o v S o u V J a o d nI f N r• d b P b-- 3c s T n a O 7 C d c VS U y c .Jn ` T d 6 � L e u U r G i �>f o �1 `yL• � L N P q � � n '� V C •E r• = C L O _ � u• � N N r O L V 6r L C .j y V ^ O O SVMr d DA _N a". p'pr� I _ J 94 I" S L '• L y N V s Q�L` E _ V N -J OW V E GV O N 9 L • r ' V L = N V �• 5 N ' „ 4 N n I I 1 I <r N r• d b P b-- 3c s T n a O 7 C d c VS U y c .Jn ` T d 6 � L e u U r G i �>f o �1 `yL• � n ^J b V C � r _ Y y ^ O O d O a". r L y N V s L E _ V N -J OW V E GV O N 9 L • r ' V �• 5 N ' „ 4 N n I I RESOLUTION NO. 83 -79B A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMQSSION AMENDING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83 -07 TO REVISE THE MASTER SITE PLAN FOR THE VIRGINIA DARE WINERY BUSINESS CENTER LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND HAVEN AVENUE ON 13.1 ACRES OF LAND - APN 1077- 401 -01 AND 03. WHEREAS on 8th day of June, 1983 the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission approved the Environmental Assessment and Conditional Use Permit 83 -01 for a Master Plan at the Virginia Dare Business Park Center, and WHEREAS on the 12th day of December, 1984 the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above- described amendment. follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Com:ni::sion resolves as SECTION I: 1. That the proposed master plan as revised is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the District in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed revised Master Plan together with the conditions applicable hereto will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injuriGus to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the revised Master Plan complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. SECTION 2: That the Conditional Use Permit No. 83 -07 is approved subject to conditions contained within the Pia,-ining Commission Resolution No. 83 -79 and 83 -79A, and the following conditions: 1. The owner shall provide for implementation of a shared parking program concept through: a. Executing all necessary parking exchange agreements between all property owners to the satisfaction of the City Attorney prior to development. b. Under the currant shared parking concept, the land use mix cannot prov'de for any greater intensification of parking demand through modification of land use types. D �-3/ Resolution No. Page 2 c. Assure through an executed agreement with the County Flood Control District, a long term lease agreement which provides for the use of the area shown on the western boundary of the plan for parking for a minimum of fifty years. d. Provide for a greater distribut ?on of compact parking stalls. 2. Assure with further enhanced opportunity features around the r Haven Avenue. 3. Provide a conceptual Design Review approval detailed site plan. detailed site plans, the for pedestrian orientation estaurant cluster adjacent to landscape plan subject to prior to the submittal of any 4. Assure that the architectural statement for all remaining buildings will be compatible with the overall architectural program currently approved for the Virginia Dare Winery office building. Am S. Assure that enhanced landscaping and architectural treatment will be required for the development of a fast food restaurant located at the northeast portion of the project site. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12th DAY OF DECEMBER, 1984. PLANNING C%DiISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY- Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary E Ll 1] Resolution.No. Page 3 I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of December, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: AESEN': COMIMISSIONERS: Q -33 E 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUC,"TONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 12, 1984 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineer Technician SUBJECT: REVISIONS TO PARCEL MAP 8303 - CHRISTESON - A change from 1:' parcels to 11 parcels - A division of = acres in the General Commercial District (GC) located at the northwest corner of Foothill Blvd. and Haven Avenue - APN 1077- 401 -01,03 Tentative Parcel Map No. 8303 was originally approved by the Planning Commission on February 22, 1984 for 15 parcels, 3 of which were to be used as common areas for parking and open space. The applicant has requested that the map be revised to provide 11 parcels, 1 of which is to be used as common area. The requested revisions correspond to the revised site plan being considered by the Commission tonight as Agenda Item C (CUP 83 -07). Both adjacent City streets will be improved as a requirement of the Parcel Map. The previous conditions of approval, (a copy is attached for your reference), shall apply to the revised parcel map with the following two modifica: ions to the General Requirements and Approvals section: 1. Previous Condition No. 11 under General Requirements and Approvals shall be eliminated and replaced by a lease agreement condition imposed upon tF.e revised CUP. 2. A Condition No. 16 shall be added, requiring that new parcels 7 and 8 be merged if a building, s,ich as the proposed movie theater is to be constructed, over the proposed parcel line separating the two parcels. The merger can be avoided by combining the two parcels into ora parcel on the Final Parcel Maa. RECOMNE90ATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution approving revised Parcel Map No. 8303. ITEM E 1� I r ii r In r rr V . 1. r Lei _. � _1 •, ��' _ w1 6./ _ ._. �a _ ,� ~ .. � • '� 1 � - \_ _ Vii. � `' �'•, V��. \ I Dn- I 1V 4•1M� � a• 1 ,) st•F v 2: L2.1 ; i Vai !•� 5`F c uE t � �,,.j� �, y:�f':'�iFp i:da!„ i • - r .• �� _�i j;;s itp �`�i� i `a ai F! z 8t;ft.L �' 12: ` i\{l:U•�) :le ♦j;i1 t.:liR +a4 E -3 G LU w W 2L• R 7 itdi i rTI Zi LO cc) ro 11s, , 2C2 = vim it nth c 13= NJ IV IMF-, It F— - LI r r In 0 cc t C6 r3 7 in �s1 T �1+ w i� tiI 3s i z t L]atl �II -�i L Y Tjy�� 4_ CYtii e�' ti]; 0 di I��•.� ul 11 li:iii: � L =— _ .� .°`rte Li il:�, 71M •lilrr 5k� �'- •_._'__ E -S I LLI ICL <LL: v' A RESOLUTION OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 8303 (TENTATIVE NORTHAEST CORNER RESOLUTION NO. 84 -19 THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER PARCEL MAP NO. 8303) LOCATED AT THE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND HAVEN AVENUE WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 8303, submitted by Christeson Company and consisting of 15 parcels, located at the northwest corner of Foothill Blvd, and Haven Avenue being a division of a portion of Lot 20, Sec -ion 2, Township 1 South, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Meridian per Map of Cucamonga Fruit Lands as recorded in Book 4, Page 9; and WHEREAS, on November 30, 1983, a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above - described Tentative Map; and WHEREAS, on February 22, 1984, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing fn: the above - described map. FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the nrnnnc c.i Auyotn....m..F 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse environmental impacts and a Negative Declaration is issued on February 22, 1984. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 8303 is approved subject to the recommended Conditions of Approval pertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1984. BY:!A Jp, Dennis L. ION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA rman — to Resolution No. 84_19 Page 2 ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a reoular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of February, 2984, by the following vcte -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERF: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS• REMPEL, i1CNIEL, BARKER, JUAREZ, STOUT NONE NONE E -7 0 C OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RMWN® O WNDITIONS OF Northwest corner of Hayeti Avenue TENTATIVE PARCEL NAP NO: 8303 FILED: 11/30/83 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A portion of Lot 20, NUMBER OF LOTS: 15 Section 2, Township 1 South, Range 7 West, GROSS ACREAGE: 13.1 San Bernardino Meridian per Map of Cucamonga ASSESSOR PARCEL NO: 1077 -401- 01 -03 Fruit Land as recorded in So—oK ., age Christeson Company Irvine, CA 32714 Improvement and dedication Municipal Code of the City to, the following: ENGINEER /SURVEYOR Hall and Foreman, Inc. 3186 -L Airway Avenue irvine, CA 92714 requirements in accordance with Title of Rancho Cucamonga include, but may not Dedications and Vehicular Access Dedications shall be made of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. rights -of -way on various additional feet on Haven as shown on tentative map 19 additional feet on Foothill Blvd. additional feet on Corner property line radius will be required per City Standards. 24 foot radius at intersection of Foothill Blvd. and Haven Ave. All rights of vehicular ingress and egress shall be dedicated except for one (1) 40 -foot opening on Haven Ave. and two (2) 40 -foot openings on Foothill Blvd. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all common toads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by C.C.&R.s which shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney and shall be recorded concurrently with the map. I X 6. All existing easements lying within future right -of -way are to be quitclaimed or delineated on the map per City Engineer's requirements. X 7. Easements for sidewalk for public use shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. Surety X 1. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the pullic improvements prior to recording for all parcels. X 2. A lien agreement must be executed prior to recording of the map for the following: median, island on Foothill Blvd. X 3. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed, guaranteeing completion of all on -site drainage facilites necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Oivison prior to issuance of building permit for each parcel. Street Improvements Pursuant to the City of Ranch Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title 16, Section 16.36.120, the subdivider may enter into an agreement and post security with the City guaranteeing the required construction prior to recordation of the map and /or building permit issuance. 1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. 2. A minimum of 26 -foot wide pavement within a 40 -foot wide dedicated right -of -way shall be constructed for all half - section streets. X 3. Construct the following missing improvements: Prior to recordation for all parcels Street Flame ur Gutter A. Pvmt. 1 e- rive Walk Appr. treet� Trees treet Li hts OverTand* qX Other Haven X X X X X X X Foothill X X X X X X X lien, --�u�, uuq alwxdping anij irrigation or meter El i X 4. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, fees shall be paid and an Encroachment permit shall be obtained ® from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. X 5. Street improvement plans shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of an encroachme.it permit. X 6. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. X 7. Existina lines of 12KV or less fronting the property shall be undergrounded. X 8. Install appropriate street name signs, traffic control signs, striping and markings with locations and types approved by the City Engineer. X 9. Street light, locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern. California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Lights shall be on decorative poles with underground service. X _ 10. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior tc the issuance of hli lrli nn nv. -wit. X 11. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Undersidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards. Drainage and Flood Control X 1. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated or noticed on the final map. X 2. Adequate provisions shall !a made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 3. The following storm drain shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer X 4. Prior to recordation of the map, a hydrologic and drainage study for the project shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review. 5. A drainage detention basin per City Standards shall. be constructed to detain increased runoff E -10 Grading X 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accer -'ante with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. roe final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading plan. X 2.' A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to Ferfo.m such work prior tw 4ssuance of building permit. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application or grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Grading Committee and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit whichever comes first. X 5. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of building permit. General Requires �s and Approvals X 1. Permits from other agencies will be raQu;reri w f�"-rs. x CalTrans for Foothill Blvd. x San Bernardino County Flood Control District x Cucamonga County slater District for sewer and water x San Bernardino County Dust Abatement (required prior to issuance of a grading permit) Other X 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (C.C.&R.$) approved by the City Attorney is required prior to recordation of the map. X 3. Provide all utility services to each lot including sewerage, water, electric power, gas and telephone prior to street constructon. X 4. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. X 5. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CalTrans and San Bernardino County Flood Control District. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. E -1� s -: I X 7. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guara ^tae that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District -iill be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. °. Local and Master Planned Trails shall be provided in accordance ,Ath the Trail Plan. A detailed trail plan indicating widths, .aximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing and weed control, in accordance with City trail standards, shall be submitted to and app -raved by the City Planner prior to recordation for and /or prior to building permit issuancor 9. Prior to recording, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District 82 -1 among the newly created parcels. X 10. At the time of final map s,ibmittal, the following shall be submitted: Title Report, traverse calcula tions (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and/or showing uriginal land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. X 11. Surplus Flood Control right -of -way along the west boundary as shown or the site plan shall be acquired and merged with parcel X 12. An easement to reserve access to the northerly property _hall be recorded at the time of recordation of the parcel map. X 13. Traffic signal relocation, if required, shall be completed by the developer and coordinated with CalTra:is. X 14. Right -of -way w`dth on Haven Avenue shall provide for two (2) left -turns lanes, three (3) thru- traffic lanes and one (1) right -turn lane for southbound traffic. X 15 The proposed storm drain in Foothill Blvd. shall be extended to DrOV :Ze ra ±ch basin at the east =nd of the proposed westerly driveway. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LLOYD B. HUBBS, CITY ENGINEER 11 RESOLUTION NO.. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPRnvIlVG REVISED PARCEL MAP NUMBER 8303 (TENTATIVE PARCEL t-iAP NO. 8303) LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND HAVEN AVENUE WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 8303, submitted by Christeson Company and consisting of 11 parcels, located on the northwest corner of Foothill Blvd. and Haven Avenue, being a division of a portion of Lot 20, Section Township 1 South, Range 7 West, San, Bernardino Meridian per map of Cucamonga Fruit Lands as recorded in Book 4, Page °; and WHEREAS, on December 12, 1984 the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the revision to said map creating 11 parcels. FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO ,UCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS SECTION 1: That the 'Following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. Allllft� 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is ® consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suit,ble for the proposed develcpment. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 3: That Revised Tentative Parcel Map No. 8303 is approved subject to tie following conditions: 1. The original Conditions of Approval contained in Resolution No. 84 -19. 2. Deletion of General R2 uirements and Approvals condition No. 11 of Resolution Yo. 84- 9. 3. Addition of General Requirements and Approvals condition No. 16 to read: 16. If a building such as the proposed movie theatre is to be constructed over the parcel line between parcels 7 and 8, the parcels shall be combined in +o a single parcel either by (1) designating them as a single parcel on the Final Parcel Map resulting i,t a 10 parcel Parcel flap, or (2) if the Parcel Map is recorded prior to ti:e final decision to construct the theatre, a Parcel Merger will be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1984. PLAWiING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Denoiis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST:—. lick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of December, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: >= -ly E 11 E CI'r°Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 12, 1984 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Tim J. Beedle, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVI 197 BENTSEN LYNN t7AVtN AYAKIMMI rnu%;rtl - n 1-erlew vi vic Environmental Assessment for a proposed Master Plan for approximately 9224 apartment units located on approximately 58.3 acres on the north side of Highland Avenue, east of Haven Avenue in the MH Development District - APN 202 -271- 59, 60. I. BACKGROUND: On July 25, 1984, the Planning Commission considered The determination of the Environmental Assessment on the Initial Study regarding the proposed development project. At that meeting they considered alternatives to concluding the action on the environmental determination. it was the decision at that tulle to move forward with a focused environmental study on several specific topics. That item+ was appealed by the applicant to the City Council. On September 5, 1984, the Council considered tha appeal and directed the preparation of a detailed circulation study which analyzed overall circulation impacts relative to the proposed project and surrounding future development. This study is complete and findings are accompanying, this report. The item is being. brought back to the Commission for recommendations on conclusion of the Environmental Assessment. The Commission, with new information, now has a choice of concluding the ei :vironmental process' or requesting additional information as it may relate to -potential environmental impacts. With the conclusion of the environmental process, adopted mitigation measures can be incorporated into the design of the project. It is anticipated that the applicant will row proceed with his plans through the Design iieview process in order to incorporate recommendations as expressed through the environmental review process into the overall Master Plan and 1st phase development program. Attached to this report is the detailed staff summary of proposed mitigation measures that were presented previously to the Planning Commission in addition to those accompanying the traffic study. These mitigation measures can be incorporated into the revised Master Plan and Conditions of Approval should the Commission accept these mitigation measures with any additional conditions. ITEM F PLANNING COMMISSION STUFF REPORT OR 84 -22 - Bentson Lynn Haven Apartment Project December 12, 1984 Page 2 II. RECOMMENDATION: The Commission should direct staff regarding completion of the environmental processes and mitigation measures which should be considered during the Design Review of the proposed project. 7 Resp4ctfuiiv su4fmitted, Rick Go Cit I RG:TB:ns 'Attachments: Traffic Study Planning Commission Staff Report - July 25, 1984 Planning Commission Minutes - July 25, 1984 City Council Minutes - September 5, 1.984 El E F- u L CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 5, 1984 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DEC 19% AN DGY I JC P/ «n11MAWrn nrAKImtN 1>) - H revi ew of the environmen a assessment or a proposed master plan for 936 apartment units located on approximately 58.3 acres on the north side of Highland Avenue, east of Haven Avenue in the Medium High development district - APN 202 - 271 -59, 69. BACKGROUND: The applicant has appealed the Planning Commission's decision Fo require a focused Environmental Impact Report for the above - described project. The Planning Commission, at its meeting of Juiy 25, 1984, held a oublic hearing to make a determination whether a Negative Declaration should be issued or a focused Environmental Impact Report should be required for the proposed project. After considerable discussion and review of the environmental assessment prepared by the applicant's environmental consultant, public testimony, and staff ..-port, the Planning Commission decision was to require a focused Environmental Impact Report to focus on the areas of land use, density, traffic /circulation, and to identify other land use alternatives. To understand the Planning Commission's decision, it is necessary to distinguish between an " Environmental Tmpact Report (EIR)" and the "Environmental Assessment" prepared by the applicant. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines define ar. EIR as "an informational document which Will inform public agency decision- makers and the public generally of the significant environmental effect of a project, identify possible ways to mitigate any significant impacts, and describe reasonable alternatives to the project." The Environmental Assessment is a compilation of technical data and related information that the City staff and Planning Commission can then use to determine whether an EIR or a Negative Declaration should be prepared. The Environmental Assessment is not an EIR. Attached for your - review and consideration is the Planning Commission staff report which fully outlines the policies and issues applicable in this case and minutes of the July 25, 1984 Planning Commission meeting. Also attached are the environmental assessment and master plan prepared by the applicant's consultant. F -3 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Appeal - OR 84 -22 /Bentsen September 5, 1984 Page 2 E RECOMMENDATION: Th., Planning Commission recommends ghat the City Council require the preparation of a focused Environmental Impact Report in the areas of land use, density, traffic /circulation;. and to identify other lard use alternatives. Respectfully submitted, Rick Gomez City Planner RG:DC:jr Attachments: Appeal Letter From Applicant Planning Commission Staff Report - July 25, 1984 Planning Cazunission Minutes - July 25, 1984 Lynnhaven Environmental Assessment Lynnhaven District -Hide Master Plan 11 s-- r -y E E r 10AoLNUffogo [Wo associates o planners City Council City of Pancho Cucamonga 9320 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga California 91730 3 August 1984 re: Environmental Assessment for Development Review Lynnhaven Community APN 202- 271 -59,69 Lan Bentsen Interests Mr. Mayor, menbers of the City Council: After due reflection and consideration it is our sincere belief that the Planning Commission erred in deciding to require an additional environmental assessment of the Lynnhaven Community development project on 25 July 1984. As the authorized representative of Lan Bentsen, Interests I hereby make aoneal to that decision of the Planning Commission. Tru d � Donald G. King, Ph.D. Principal W E 6 31 a V S 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADM1NISi'R. TION AUG 3 1984 has I'm 718og1101�i�i11`ZIsa�1�6B b c_S 9375 Archibald Avenue, Suite 212 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 (714) 937 -7077 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AUG 0; 0198-1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA j„ PR CITY COUNCIL 713t9,;01UILI11121`d�1s1516 The Rancho Cucamonga City Council will be holding public hearings at 7:30 I.M. on September 5, at the Lions Park Community Building located at 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730, to consider the following described project(s): APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO REQUIRE A FOCUSED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84 -27 - BENTSEN - The development of a 924 unit apartment complex to be built in 3 phases on approximately 58.3 acres of land located on the north side of Highland Avenue, east of Haven Avenue in the MH Development Distrirt - APN 202 - 271 -59, 60. Anyone having concerns or questions on any of the above items is welcome to contact the City Planning Division at (714) 989 -1851, or visit the office located at 9340 Base Line Road, Unit B. Also, anyone objecting to or in favor of the above, may appear in person at the above- described meeting or may submit their concerns in writing to the Planning Division, City of Rancho Cucamonga, Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, prior to said meeting. August 24. 1984 Date For ubl— i� cation 0 Rancho Cucamonga City Council GZ`A5"'"r" '6•- -�� �+� �-r/ Z F —(o J C� D I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Reauested: Environmental determination of the Initial Study. F:, Purpose: Environmental determination for the development of a 924 apartment unit Master Plan. C. Location: North side of Highland Avenue, 500 feet east of Haven Avenue. D. Parcel Size: 58.27 acres, gross; 45.42 acres, net. E. Project Density: 15,85 du /ac, gross; 20.37 du /ac, net. F. Existin land Use and Zoning: Vacant parcel, zoned Medium High esidentia . G. Surrounding Land Use and Zonir.R: North - Vacant parcel, zoned Low Medium Residential. Northwest - Single family residential, zoned Low Medium Residential. South - Proposed Foothill Freeway corridor; single family residential, zoned Low and Low Medium Residential. East - Va =ant parcel, zoned Medium Residential. West Vacant parcel, zoned Neighborhood Commercial. H. General' ?lan Desi nations: roJect ite - Medium High Residential, (Master Plan required), 14 -24 du /ac. North - Low Medium Residential, (4 -8 du /ac). r• CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT �° G Vr c �!CA,�o O� lr F_!II W r � � ZJ I Z iJ DATE: July 25, 1984 197 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner 8Y: Frank Dreckman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR rEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84 -22 - BENTSEN LYNNHAVEN APARTMENTS A review of the environmental assessment`or a proposed master plan for 936 apartment units located on approximately 58.3 acres on the north side of Highland Avenue, east of Haven Avenue in the Medium -High Development District - APN 202 - 271 -59, 69. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Reauested: Environmental determination of the Initial Study. F:, Purpose: Environmental determination for the development of a 924 apartment unit Master Plan. C. Location: North side of Highland Avenue, 500 feet east of Haven Avenue. D. Parcel Size: 58.27 acres, gross; 45.42 acres, net. E. Project Density: 15,85 du /ac, gross; 20.37 du /ac, net. F. Existin land Use and Zoning: Vacant parcel, zoned Medium High esidentia . G. Surrounding Land Use and Zonir.R: North - Vacant parcel, zoned Low Medium Residential. Northwest - Single family residential, zoned Low Medium Residential. South - Proposed Foothill Freeway corridor; single family residential, zoned Low and Low Medium Residential. East - Va =ant parcel, zoned Medium Residential. West Vacant parcel, zoned Neighborhood Commercial. H. General' ?lan Desi nations: roJect ite - Medium High Residential, (Master Plan required), 14 -24 du /ac. North - Low Medium Residential, (4 -8 du /ac). r• PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Environmental Assessment and OR 34 -22 - 8entson July 25, 1984 Page 2 Zouth - Low and Low Medium Residential, (2 -4 and 4 -8 du /ac;. East - Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac). West - Neighborhood Commercial. I. Site Characteristics: As illustrated on Exhibit "A ", the Lynnhaven project site is predominantly vacant with the exception cf various Eucalyptus windrows which transverse the site in an east/west fashion. Presently, the si a is undeveloped with no structures er ex4sting improvements. The s' ^ contains a variety of indigenous plant materials listing of coastal sage scrub varieties. The site slopes at approximately an 8% grade, north to south. J. Project Description Master Plan: As illustrated on the site plan, Exhibit "A ", the applicant is proposing the development of a 924 unit apartment complex on 15.85 acres of land in the Medium High Residential Cistrict. The complex will consist of three phases of approximately 300 units each. Units will consist of one -, two- , and three - bedrooms contained in one -, two -, and three -story clusters. Total open space consists of 18,86 acres. Access to the project is via Lemon Avenue. Four access driveways have been provided which lead to an interior loop circulation system. Phase 1: Phase 1 consists of a total of 316 dwelling units with an overall density of 20.58 dwelling units per acre. Usable open space equates to 6.95 acres and 620 parking spaces have been provided. Dwellings will consist of one -, two -, and three- bedroom units located within one to three -story units. II. FNYIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:. The following Environmental Analysis is designed to elaborate upan the potential environmental impacts listed on the Initial: Environmental Study, Part II. The analysis includes a description of the environmental setting; identifies potential environmental impacts; includes applicant's proposed mitigation measures, along with to additional mitigation measures which may be appropriate. as identified by Staff. The Planning Corrinission will have to determine whether a Negative Declaration should be issued, or whether an Environmental Impact Report should be required, for the prcpased project. F- 8 C 11 E PLAMMIG COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Environmental Assessme -t and OR 84 -22 - Bentson July 25, 1984 is Page 3 A. Geolooy /Soils There are tw,, potential sourc_s of future ground rupture within the City, these being the potentially active Cucamonga and Red Hill faults, (E),nibit "B ".) The Alquist - Priolo Geologic Hazard Zones Act of 1973 requires that special study zones oe established around potentially and recently active fault areas. line project site lies outside of both these special study zones. Soils within the project site area consist of the Tijur.ga- Soboba variety characterized by deep, well drained, and rapidly permeable soils. Development constraints related to soil characteristics appears minimal. The topography of the site, Exhibit "C ", is characterized by a relatively flat geologic plate tilted in a north /south direction. The drop in elevation across the site (1,350 feet) is 69 feet from north to south, producing an average slope of aproximately 6 %. Impacts o Unavoidable adverse impacts related to seismic activity. Potential for a 6.5 - 7.5 magnitude event is possible along the Cucamonga and Red Hill faults. o Increased on -site erosion due to project grading, cuts, and fills. Proposed Mitigation Measures o Strict adherence to the Uniform Building Code Seismic Standards. o Strict adherence to the requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga grading standards. Additional Mit cation Measures o Provide an erosion and dust control plan. e The site shall be graded in accordance with the City grading standards as they relate to the following topics: Restrict slope to 8 feet in vertical height, per City standards. OY . :` F -g PLAYAI01G COMMISSIOm STAFF REPOP Environmental Assessment and OR 34 -22 - Bentson July 25, 1984 Page 4 - Encourage 3:1 slopes to be used exclusively. - The site shoula be designed to accommodate grading by providing a series of steps. - Contour grading ;rinciples should be utilized providing natural appearing slopes. o Retaining wall should be provided to reduce slope impact. 3. Hydrology Setting: As illustrated in Exhibit "D ", the project site will receive hydrologic flows from as far north as the Chaffey College campus. The applicant has provided two storm drain alternatives (Exhibit "E ") designed to accommodate drainage generated by a 25 year storm. The first alternative advocates providing a drainage pipe contiguous to the southerly property line, which would gather stormwater runoff and convey it to the south under Highland Avenue to the Deer Creek channel. The second alternative advocates providing a drainage pipe contiguous to the southerly property line, but conveying stormwater runoff eastward, along Highland Avenue, to the Deer Creek 0 annel. is The project site does not fall within a 100 -year flood plain, which is that area of land subject to flood hazards from a storm whose intensity occurs an the average of .ince every 100 years (Exhibit "F"). Impacts o Increased residential development could accentuate the City's flooding problem by decreasing the amount of permeable ground surface and increasing the amount of water runoff. o Increased erosion due to on -site excavation, site clearance, utility trenching, etc. Proposed Mitigation Measures G Me applicant has proposed two drainage system alternatives to ,accommodate on -site flows, and drainage generated off - site to the north. E �I oLANNING COM`iISSION STAFF REPCIT Environmental Assessment and DR 84 -22 - Bentson July 25, 1984 Page 5 Additional Mitigation Aeas'ures o Provide additional open space designeC to accom=date water percolation. o Provide an erosion control plan designed to mitigate on- site construction erosion, o Frovide temporary on -site siltation basins designed to control <-osion. C. Biota Setting: The project site is located within the coastal Sage Scrub Association characterized by perennial grasses and native plrt materials. According to the General Plan Environmental Impact Report, development east of 4aven Avenue, and north of Highland Avenue (project site) should be sensitive to the site. Builders are required to ensure that grading and construction practices minimize land alterations and removal of native vegetation. The Environmental Impact Report. also encourages preservation o: existing Eucalyptus windrows which occur on the site) whenever possible. Currently no .wildlife or plant species found within the Rancho Cucamonga area is on, or officially proposed, for addition to the Department of Interior's Endangered Species list. Impacts o Loss of native plant materials. c Elimination of ,habitat (cover- feeding areas, open space) for small ma=als such as rabbits and numerous birds that occupy the coastal. -scrub association, forcing micration. Proposed Mitigation Measures o Windrow preservation, wherever possible. Additional Mitigation Measures o Provide a +ndrow preservation plan. G Use nati• :e, indigenous plant materials wherever possible. PLANNING Co"IMISSION STAFF REP01T Environmental Assessaen� and 01: 84 -22 - 'entson juiy 25, 1984 Page 6 D. Traffic /Circulation Set�tina: The project site currently abuts heca is a .major east -west Highland Avenue, t In the future arterial. , however, the proposed Foothill Freeway will traverse the southerly edge Of the project site, separating Highlano Avenue from the project site. °rimary access to the site wi`l be provided by Lemo. *, Avenue w" ch :rill extend to t development, he east with Each phase of Freeway to and then veer south under the proposed Foothill and connect to Highland Avenue, west of the Deer Creek channel (Exhibit u), o collector street. Lemon Avenue is currently a become a secondary highway with anpSo foot thahtLemon Avenue In addition, the applicant is propo,ing the inclusion right-of-way. left turn lane and traffic signal at Lemon and Haven Avenues (Exhibit H). The applicant has proJected average daily traffic generared froar the Lynnhaven development to be 5,710 average da ?ty trips, with projected average daily trips for Lynnhaven, ay,d the surrounding area of 15,910. Imn3cts o Increased traffic on Lemon Avenue east of Haven. (Increased vehicle trips Per day of up to 5,601 from the Lynnhaven project.) Pr000sed Mitigation Measur25 Lemon Avenue to become a Secondary Highway desicred to accoimodate the increased traffic (80 f*_. row, 64 ft. curb- t0-curb). o Installation cf a traffic Avenues. signal at Haven alld Highland o Installation Of a left turn only lane, an optional left turn/through lane, and a right turn only lane at Haver. and Lemon Avenues. Additional Mitigation 'Measures o Provide the L_.ron Avenue easterly loop (to Hignland Avenue with the first prDiect phase. ) F•= — \a E 1— PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Environmental Assessment and OR 84 -22 - Bentson July 25, 1984 Page 7 E. Noise Set*_irq /Impacts: As is evident, the proposed Lynnhaven will abut the proposed Foothill Freeway; a noise source which will create the most significant change in the noise environment of the City. As depicted on Exhibit "I ", future noise contours adjacent to the Foothill Freeway +ill reach a level of 65 Ldn. Azcording to the General Plan Environmental Impact 'Report, it was assumed that ncise mitigation (by Cal Trans) would be included i,i the design of the freeway, reducing the noise ',ovs s by 10 dBA below what would occur witho:-* mitigation. However, even with the 10 9BA of attenuation, noise levels will increase at twellings backing up to the freeway corridor by as much as 10 dBA, raising the average (Ldn) noise level to between 65 and 75 Ldn. (A 10 dBA increase is perceived as approximately a doubling in loudness.) As illustrated in Exnibit "J ", Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Environments, multi - family residential developments may be exposed comfortably to approximately ED Ldn; noise levels between 60 -70 Ldn require new construction or development to be undertaken only after a detailed analysis of noise reduction requirements is made and needed noise in•ulation features included in the design. Noise levels between 70 -75 Ldn are potentially unacceptable. If new construction or development does proceed in the 70 -75 Ldn noise contours, a detailed analysis of the noise reductir:, requirements must be made and needed noise insulation features included in the design. Outdoor areas must be shielded. Proposed Mitigation Measures a Require an acoustical analysis showing now noise standards of 6� CNEL (exterior) and 45 "CNEL (interior) can be met fo- dwellings located within 100 feet of arterial streets, and 400 feet of the .prGpased freeway corridor. o Use of glazing and wall materials to reduce noise (dBA). o Buffer the interior of the development by carports and three -stcry buildings. o Reduce construction yours between 6:00 and 8:00 p.m. Muffle mezhanicai equipment. Additional Nitioation Measures a An additional acoustical analysis shall be required prior to scheduling the project for subsequent Planing Commission approval. The analysis shall include: PL ':`?ING CTIMISSION STAFF REPORT Environmental Assessment and 00 84 -22 - Bentson July 25, 11984 Page 8 - A detail-d future noise contour map of the site, illustrating noise contours generated by Lemon Avenue and the Foothill Freeway. - Dwellings shall be located outs, a the 60 Ldn future noise contours. Outdoor areas shall be shielded frcn potentially unacceptable noise levEls. A 60 t.dn noise level shall be acceptable for exterior noise. - Providing berming and intensified landscaping adjacent to the Foothill Freeway corridor and Lemon Avenue. - Increasing the distance between noise source and the proposed buildings. - Placing non -noise sensitive lane _•ses, such as parking let, betwcen noise sources and dwellings. - Using non -noise sensitive structures such as carports to shield noise - sensitive areas. - Orienting buildings to shield outdoor spaces from noise so irces. Is - Placing noise sensitive spaces (bedrooms) away from major noise sources. - Providing noise barriers or walls oetween noise sources and dwellings. - Providing construction methods such as sealed windows, thicker windows: double glazing, solid core doors, wail modifications, etc., to reduce interior noise. F. Services Utilities: Utilities will be provided to the project site by the Southern Ca'ifornia Gas Company, General Telephone, the Chino Basin Muni :ipal :,later District, and the Cu_amonga County Water District. Impacts: None, Police /Fire: Fire service is provided by the Foothill Fire District. Response tines to the ,ite are 5 minutes for Station No. % 9 minutes for Station No. 2, and 8 minutes for Station No. 3. Police facilities are provided by the County Sheriff's Department. F -�y PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Environmental Assessment and DR E4 -22 - 8entson July 25, 1984 Page 9 Impacts: a The project is located adjacent to a fire hazard area. An additional 122 calls will occur annually due to the Lynnhaven development. o The proposed project will add an additional 329 tails annually for police responses. Proposed Mitigation Measures o Fire resistant building design. o Removal of vegetative fuel due to site clearance. o Plant fire retardant plant materials. o Adequate fire hydrant spacing, water flows, etc. o Cash contribution towards the Fire District's fire protection fund for new fire stations. Additional Mitigation Measures o Further information is necessary to determine the need for additional fire and police personnel. Education: The Alta Loma School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District provide K -12 publ'c education for this section of the community. Impacts o The project wila generate a total of 145 students to be absorbed ircto -ttha Alta Loma art Chaffey Schoul D-istricts. Proposed Mitigation Measur o School fees will be levied on each apartment unit. G. LAND 9SE Setting- As illustrated on the site plan, = ,.nibit "A ", the Lynnhaven deveiopment is divided into three pages of approximately 15 acres. Each phase is designed to acr-ommodatA approximately 300 units and 6 acres of oper space. Overali density for the entire project equates to 20.58 duelling units per acre. However, the applicant has attempted to transition F - kS PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Environmental Assessment and OR 84 -22 - Sentsor. July 25, 1984 Page 10 the density from lower density, 6.98 d--4/--c adjacent to Lemon Avenue, to 24 du/ac' adjacent to t;ie Foothill Freeway corridor (Exhibit "K"). According to the applicant, each phase will be distinguished from the other by different product types (floor ,Plans and elevations), in addition to variation in architectural theme, unit design, materials and siting. Each of the thre^ phases will be separ ?ted into two distinct sites by a circulation spine which traverses the site in an east /west fashion. The rorthermost portion of the site will contain single story structures adjacent to Lemon Avenue, with lower density and larger oriented units. The southerly areas on the site ar> designed primarily with density levels of between dwelling units per acre (Exhibit "Ka). Impacts • Neighborhood compatibility with existing and future single family structures, located north of the project_ site. • Increased traffic generation or, Lemon Avenue. Pr000sed Mitigation Measures • Transition of density away from L°_T,.f avenue (7 du /ac adjacent to Lemor. Avenue). • Single story units adjacent to Lemon Avenue. Additional Mitigation Measures o The Planning Commission ma }: request various Master Plan alternatives designed to provide a greater transition of = znsity; greater d?stinction of product types; inclusion of additional open space; alternative site configurations, etc. III. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ALTERNATI`JES The Planning Commission needs to determine the appropriateness of (1) issuing a_Negative Declaration, or (2) requiring a focused Environmental Impact Report. Alternative' 1.- Negative Declaration: Alternative 1 describes the issuance o : ion o a ne ative Dec aratnly if the Commission agrees that the initial environmental analysis is complete and that the mitigation measures proposed (which will become conditions of IP - lto _E E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF Environmental Assessment July 25, 1984 Page 11 REPORT vd OR 84 -22 - Bentson project approval) adequately address and mitigate all environmental impacts. If this alternative is chosen, the Planning Commission shall direct staff to prepare the necessary environmental documentation for Planning Commission consideration prior to project approval. Alternative 2: Environmental Impact Report: Alternative 2 describes the requirement for an nvIronm Impact Report. If the Commission determines that the environmientai assessment of the Initial Study has not fully addressed the issues and that further environmental information is needed prior to project review, than an Environmental Impact Report should be required and shall incluae and identify various project alternatives, growth inducements, and cumulative impacts, as well as additional analysis in those areas identified by the Planning Commission. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised for environmental review in he Baily Report_ newspaper. In addition, persons living within 500 feet of the project site have been notified by mail. In addition, the Deer Creek Pomeowner °s Association and members of the 19th Street Corridor group have also been notified. 11 ck FD:ns Attachments submitted, 'F —1-1 IE t--rLx rr -.77777=7L-I v ir IE t--rLx rr -.77777=7L-I :� rr _ -i J •I 9 c � a _ a i I flOk' zi ti►.'ti. _ �(1 g3 "�,6yj 3 99 Lit SIR UW CL s .el` d cl iM OF RANCHO CUCATMUNGN PLV NNI':G DIVISION —" -- NN F — \5 TnU: _ S Exit itt)'t'- SCAM CITY JF RANCHO C CA1:�o�A MANNING DIVISION Figure V -3 GEOTECHNICAL HAZARDS SLOPE mmsauw Q EXCESSNE SLOPE f40%1 dial FAJLURE was �m m uow�c+a SEISMIC MA2AR3S: t-'-i ISf -PRIaD �Try SCi1dE5 2LkiE 571J0YES Z>JE _— FIAT V [FORTH ITEM: TITLE: �� hv_� a.Za•s�,S EXHir4T: tj"�_ $CA[g: F -ao Ll `J 4; 0 30 crry OF — IT E.\ 1: RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: PLANNING DIVEM F-XIiIflIT: C, SCALE: F - :).\ z Z lu Y! U 3 ZE 22Z 2Z >0um .J4 NORTH 40 I 1.4h 0 30 crry OF — IT E.\ 1: RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: PLANNING DIVEM F-XIiIflIT: C, SCALE: F - :).\ z Z lu Y! U 3 ZE 22Z 2Z >0um .J4 NORTH ® ammi l+iallimmo E ® TRIBUTARY AREA Cl l.+ CITY OF ice.- 3,Nc! -1O CUCANIQNGA PLANNING DIVISION `rEm: TITLE: EXHIBIT: _-� SC %LE: P -aa C/' NORTH El 0 �a 244 >n 4U 2_ aj P1 11 r I *I I I ..L r oy , °u c` I or- PLANNING MIISM o � e i r •�,I \ YuL EXIllMT- t SCALE- IF -a3 I z a CK a z c a 0 a 0 rr 's f m IL Y r"�J NORTE. 1 U1't +F' T '1 1 I W I � K 1 a I r oy , °u c` I or- PLANNING MIISM o � e i r •�,I \ YuL EXIllMT- t SCALE- IF -a3 I z a CK a z c a 0 a 0 rr 's f m IL Y r"�J NORTE. oy , °u c` I or- PLANNING MIISM o � e i r •�,I \ YuL EXIllMT- t SCALE- IF -a3 I z a CK a z c a 0 a 0 rr 's f m IL Y r"�J NORTE. c s i NORTH CITY GF RANCHO CL:Ct,-tj.,L\-jo4\GA PLAN JNG DiVLSI()jN F -ay Ll E ?orv,n ,Avenue '� +othlt! Fri �waY� "ith Street A 0 L5,710 VTD _ l _ P PROACr 31i� ice_ t • i CITY OF RANCHO C-UCANM FLVNiVI \C MMnN FBI 2I il� IT=....\ I: _, EXHIBIT: SCALE - P-as NORTH J I• h 1. •f I )r 1 LEMON .O" .� ip 4' r� Y, h CITY • V'I i • CUCAXIONGA DITrLqQN 'L _ ��. •. •, _ "' �..i." � ..:; .- J 1, 1�l 'r�..:f_.f ! , 7 All JL! nit L _ :':� _ .` ----H t- - -' - -; W S 1 Ell/ 1 ii w I F-2 I - n� mom. 0 �� l� f ( t��,�.1 CI'T'Y OF O® RAINCHO CUCANIO\GA PL VNNl \G DlNrMN FUTURE NOISE EXPOSURE CONTOURS NISE CONTOUR �- NOISE pR �� r CONTOURS NORTH � � ITEM- J,rju: 6_L2102 EX, HIW: _ SC ALE: _ F -Q-) N v' INTERPRETATION NORMALLY ACCEPTABLE DeCITIea la;a USA! IS SaTISf0CTory. Dated Upon the assumption that my buildings ;nw:,e, are of normal Conventional construc.tfon. w,thout my special mJise insvlaLOn requirements. CONDITIONALLY ACCEPTABLE r:ew cnnstructwn or cevelopment should be undertaken only otter a deta;led analysis of the noise reduction repu.rements is mane and needed na;se insulation fea- tureS Included in the design. Convenbana! conitruc- lion. bur with closed windows and fresh air supply systems or air conditioning will normally suffice. Out- door enVlronmLmt wlll Seem n .w. Low POTENTIALLY UNACCEPTABLE New tonsrructlon or Development Should generally be discouraged. It new construction or development aocs procee0, a 0*10,1ed ordlysis of the m:,, reduction teduirements mu6t be made ad needed raise insulo- :ion features Included in the resign_ Putdoor aeon must be shielded. ca NORMALLY ljllG. ^EPTABLE New emsrrucTlon 'r development Should generally oat be undertaken. Ccnstr4C1ion costs to make the indoor mvironnent CCCe3Tabie would be prohibif;ve and the Figure V -9 outdoor environment mould rot be uscble. LAND USE COMPATIBILITY FOR COMMUNITY NOISE ENVIRONMENTS NORTH CI'I'Z' QF ITE\1: R \,CHO CL'CAdIO\GA T,-rLE: PLri,NN4 uNG DIVLS[QN E`CHII3fT- SGLEt F -aa 11 C la.I.M1.11 \UI.(Lvu.L et :• \U 11[t•S[: -0tr Ca. 04 LIU tf W of Jt n Sa �L.II.IV UL tu- oL...fr pc \olt Its na. ..oe .w+.Itt ' MLl1D1 \:1•I -MLL II f•MILV I I .u.Ill\ I.yl(LS I l YRS IJYURIlt Cvl9(n(1 mN1 NL5 \t u+.\G pwLS .101104l1wt la\CLRt I n•LL% I vnY f +•Rl \, OLf 00ot l NLC1,11111 SPORTS I I rt •r LYrL`.a1 1 \ULntoew)aa R•R•S rAllr lll(It.t1 RIDI\ •t,nlL1 -•ILR RLCRWO.. lt..t i(R45 nrr.C[ RLILDI\OS eL3I1111 l nor t.uw•L I\alSI Rl,l .I n\Li •C I>R Iha uuun(t.wucuLSUt {. INTERPRETATION NORMALLY ACCEPTABLE DeCITIea la;a USA! IS SaTISf0CTory. Dated Upon the assumption that my buildings ;nw:,e, are of normal Conventional construc.tfon. w,thout my special mJise insvlaLOn requirements. CONDITIONALLY ACCEPTABLE r:ew cnnstructwn or cevelopment should be undertaken only otter a deta;led analysis of the noise reduction repu.rements is mane and needed na;se insulation fea- tureS Included in the design. Convenbana! conitruc- lion. bur with closed windows and fresh air supply systems or air conditioning will normally suffice. Out- door enVlronmLmt wlll Seem n .w. Low POTENTIALLY UNACCEPTABLE New tonsrructlon or Development Should generally be discouraged. It new construction or development aocs procee0, a 0*10,1ed ordlysis of the m:,, reduction teduirements mu6t be made ad needed raise insulo- :ion features Included in the resign_ Putdoor aeon must be shielded. ca NORMALLY ljllG. ^EPTABLE New emsrrucTlon 'r development Should generally oat be undertaken. Ccnstr4C1ion costs to make the indoor mvironnent CCCe3Tabie would be prohibif;ve and the Figure V -9 outdoor environment mould rot be uscble. LAND USE COMPATIBILITY FOR COMMUNITY NOISE ENVIRONMENTS NORTH CI'I'Z' QF ITE\1: R \,CHO CL'CAdIO\GA T,-rLE: PLri,NN4 uNG DIVLS[QN E`CHII3fT- SGLEt F -aa 11 C THIS DENSITY TRANSITION SHOWN FOR PHASE ONE. IT IS TYPICAL FOR ALL PH.AZiES El 11 center of drive center of drive center of open space spine this area to the north is zoned 4M 4 to 8 Units per acre LEMON AVENUE 225 acres net / 16 Units: 7.11 units per acre net 2.80 acres gross f 16 Units 5.71 units per acre gross 2.84 acres 140 Units: 14.0 Units po- a net 4.86 acres net 1 90 Units: 18.51 Units per acre net 5.40 acres net / 170 Units: 31.48 Units peir acre no. 822 acres gross / 170 Units: 20.68 Wi s per as a gross CITY OF RANCHO Ci:CtNlo.N, FL.ANNIN-G DINISI)v ' � V NORM rrEti h TITLE; ��a EXHiBrr. L - _ SCALE• F -3o rte; ..? �� v Yv"ir► �F�!.iQ- _- � }.�.. J - - - %r__ __ - _ - -� � �� CITY OF RANCHO Ci:CtNlo.N, FL.ANNIN-G DINISI)v ' � V NORM rrEti h TITLE; ��a EXHiBrr. L - _ SCALE• F -3o DEVELOPMENT REVIEW LYNNHAVEN PROO ECT COMMENTS RANCHO CUCAMONGA SHERIFF'S STATION BY DEPUTY JOHN SCHLABACH 989 -0511 TRAFFIC: There will be an increased workload on the Traffic Unit. The unit will be receiving calls on traffic collisions and will be expected to enforce traffic laws within the project. Also the increased flow of traffic outside the project will increase the enforcement load along with more accidents. CRIMINAL ACTIVITY: With the influx of many new families the crime rate will increase with i,_-. It is recommended that proper security locks be installed on all doors and windows. Doors must have deadbolts with one inch throw bolts and free flowing cylinder guards installed- Windows must not be removable in. a closed and locked position. The sliding portion of the windows anti sliding glass doors must be on the inside tracks. Any child play areas must be located to allow good visibility from surrounding homes. Any community swimming pool=_ must be clearly visible iron homes and the street. LIGHTING• Any play areas or community pool areas must have sufficient lighting during darkness. Sidewalks Si:ould have at least 'five -foot candles of lighting during darkness. Any parking lots should have five -foot can of lighting during darkness. If a laundry room is proposed, it must have large windows and should be located to allow visibility inside from the street. It must have sufficient lighting inside and outside. Lighting in parks, pools, pa =king lots and laundry room areas should have light sensitive switchers. KI F -3� 5 �' I � � '�.t , r � . +I it �- �., � s.:� -. � � � � , r � i �� e::�� / y ' I ;.t � J •,.`f��i f..r.... i. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA C,`CAA,0 MEMORANDUM °ma �c . fit Z DATE: July 9, 1984 I177 TO: Tim ieedle, Senior Planner n FROM: Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer;; „ /�� i'*' SUBvECT: Environ— mental Assessment for Lynnhaven Project The following are comments on the adequacv of the Environmental Assessment prepared by Donald King & Associates for the above project: TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION 1. The trip generation rate used for project traffic is the minimum acceptable for analysis. City staff will inflate Lhe resultant traffic volumes for determination of project conditions, etc., so the calculations need not be repeated with more desirable rates at this time. 2. The analysis of traffic impacts on Lemon Avenue here done using only the Project traffic. Traffic generated by the area between Lemon and Banyan and the area east of the project area should also be included and distributed appropriately. It is felt by City staff that neither the master play, cross section of Lemon nor the Haven /Lemon intersection will be adequate if the impact area mentioned above is developed at upper end densities. Impacts and mitigation should be assessed using all traffic to determine if provisions for upgrading these facilities should now be made. 3. Temporary connections to Highland Avenue have been proposed for each phase as interim access. Such access points would be primary accesses because of the predominately southerly orientation of travel from the project area. The elimination of'this access by freeway construction and /or the realignment of Highland Avenue to the south could thus cause a considerable problem far the City. There should be an assessment of the effects of the creation of a dependence upon these temporary accesses. I HYDROLOGY t The hydrologic assessment appears adequate, subject to confirmation of quantities at later stages of planning. The general assumption of the provision of an,adequate storm drain system should also be further supported in any planning documents for the project. PAR: jaa P Foal e!I Mae P RO Tl EC 1L IO V DIS I �'1J : ROC9 Cucamonga. P.O. Box x'35 CA 91701 July 1T, 1934 4 ;1_'. z ='an.= Drec Y-=n, assistant Cit-r of Rancho Planner w !` Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 v: ° - CPI Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: The L_rnr_ Haven Project 1, Prcpcsed 936 units on Highland ^ venue 3L1T: Ccnditions as set forth by the Foothill Lyre Jlstrict for approval of said project Dear vL . Drecl mn: In addition to the information and co W eats Provided in the initial study of the Erviror�ental Impact Report, the following conditions shall also applf_ The paragraph on page 57 item 3.10b ir._pact, 3rd paragraph shall be corrected to read as on it has been determined by the Fire District that this project :rill have significant impact and ::ill generate approxirately 122 additional emergency responses annually. L. B. I. Development, Inc. asst negotiate with ;her re District a fair and equitable contribution toward the District's fire protection fund to mitigate da.ages• The standard fire district impact formula will be used to determine the degree of contribution proportionate to the reed created. Correction number 2 appears on page 58, section 3.10c under mitigating measures, paragraph nu=ber 4. The figure 1,250 gallons per minute recuirement shall be struck and corrected to read 2,000 gallop inch for 2 hours, per minute-at 20 Pounds per square On page 58, section 3.10c mitigating measures, under paragraph 5, the se :.tence reads: These measures have mot yet been implemented. struck. This sentence shall be New sentence shall read: Prior to recordation of the first tract, the following shall be accomplished. Item a, `fire hydrant spacing and fire flow shall conform to district reouirewents. Item. b, L. B. I. Development, proportionately proportionaely based upon project Inc. shall impact to the construction of a fire station and facilities and to the ongoing operational and manning needs of said station. Item c, L. B. I. Development, Inc. shall contribute 6623 Amethyst St., Rancho Ctusmoop, C.A. 91701 F -`31A C1 Phone (714) 987 -2535 Frank Drec'.!c=a, Y 17, 198'4 e 2 Assistant Planner Proportionately based upon project impact to the varchase of fire anraratus and eouipment to 7 on eily ran said station. Item d, all aspects of the project relating to fire and life safety shall conform to local conditions and standards of the Fire District and the most recent adopted edtion of the Uniform Fire Code. In closing, we look forward to meeting rich represertati7es Of L. B. I. Develop- ment, Inc. and stand ready to assist in any •may possible. With,7, ours ± /ru ly� Jim W. Bouman Fire 'arshal, Cc,rnLn4 -ty Development L� •- cc: L. B. I. Development, Inc. rr,._ D.G. King, Associate Planners JB /r..g 0 Draft Excerpt - Planning Commission Minutes - July 25, 1984 PUBLIC HEARING:: B. ENVIRONMFNTI 84 -22 - BENTSEN (LYNNHAVEN assessment for a proposed master plan for 936 apartment units located on approximately 58.3 acres on the north side of Highland Avenue, east of Haven Avenue in the Medium -High Development District - APN 202 - 271 -59, 69. Rick Gomez, City Planner, reviewed the staff report and explained that the purpose of the hearing this evening was to make an environmental determination and not a decision on the project at this time. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Don King, 9375 Archibald, Rancho Cucamonga, representing the applicant, addressed the Commission. Mr. King advised that the environmental document prepared and distributed prior to this meeting was the third such document to be prepared for this site. He further stated that the Commission has adequate environmental documentation to make a decision now without the requirement for additional environmental information. Mr. King stated that this project would generate school fees for school expansion and would also contribute towards the construction of a new fire statioi. He further stated the Sheriff's Department advised that this project would not create crime problems in this area and would not have a significant impact on the Sheriff's Department. Gordon Brickan, 1621 E. 17th, Santa Ana, California, representing the applicant, addressed the Commission stating that traffic noise level studies were prepared for this site and that there are no problems associated with this project which cannot be mitigated. Herman Kemmel, 3300 Irvine Avenue, Newport Beach, California, representing the applicant, addressed the Commission stating that his firm had prepared traffic studies for the environmental document presented to the Commission. Mr. Kemmel reviewed the traffic impacts and mitigation measures. Peter Pfeiler, Pfeifer Engineering, 1749 Euclid, Ontario, California, representing the applicant addressed the Commission regarding the drainage and �vdrology impacts and mitigation measures for the project. John Futscher, San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department, Rancho Cucamonga Substation, addressed the Commission to clarify Mr. King's statement regarding crime impacts. He stated that the fact that the 900 units were apartments would not be significant; however, 900 units would have an impact on law enforcement capabilities. The following individuals addressed the Commission in opposition to the protect based on concerns regardir;q increased crime, impacts on schools, compatibility, traffic, access on Lemon Avenue, and drainage. F -36 E 11 E LJ Cathy Drees, Rancho Cucamonga Daryl Nicolay, 6245 Dakota, Rancho Cucamonga Mary Dodds, 6709 Mango, Rancho Cucamonga James Hill, Rancho Cucamonga John Gandra, 9633 Highland, Rancho Cucamonga Craig Nelson, 10560 Lemon, Rancho Cucamonga Laura Nelson, 10560 Lemon, Rancho Cucamonga Mrs. Beckman, 1031 Liberty, Rancho Cucamonga Additionally, a petition was presented to the Commission which contained the names of over 200 individuals opposing the project. Don Ki ;,g responded to the concerns of the residents. He stated that those concerns expressed regarding apartments could not be addressed because apartments are provided in the General Plan for the City and this applicant is trying to design this project in ? manner consistent with those goals. He advised that this project would mitigate traffic and drainage for the entire area. Additionally, the apartments are 82% adult units and would only generate approximately 40 school children, of which only about 25 would be K -8 grade students. He further stated that market studies show that there is a need for apartments in the City. Commissioner Chitiea asked if the thought had been given to working with the commercial group next to the project to provide a second access to the southwestern portion of the project. Mr. King replied that this option had been explored; however, from the City's traffic standpoint this would not be desirable due to the location of the freeway on and off ramps. Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer, clarified that the alternate presented to the City proposed an access point at the southerly access of the shopping center; however, an access point at the center access might be a good secondary access. Mr. icing stated that this site is a neighborhood commercial center and to put a road through the center would make that particular site unusable as a neighborhood convenience cen`,er•because there would not be adequate space for parking or good marketing. Chairman Stout closed the publ)- '-earing. Commissioner Barker stated that taking into consideration the surrounding proper =ies including the recent change in the sphere of influence to the east he would feel more comfortable if the issues were looked at it in greater detail. He additionally stated that he would like to see other alternatives explored and discussed so that they could be compared and would recommend a focused Environmental• Impact Report. F -37 Commissioner Rempei agreed with Conanissioner Barker and stated that the traffic and circulation needed to be further explored. He additionally requested that more definitive data be provided on how fire and police response times were arrived at and a comparison of these calls between single family housing and apartment units. Commissioner Chitiea stated that she would like to know whether the fire responses were keyed to exterit-: it interior fires. She further requested more information on the type of formula used to determine the number of students oenerated by this project. Commissioner Barker explained that there are standard formulas used by the school districts to determine the estimated number of students. Commissioner McNiel stated that his concerns Kere the same expressed by the other Commissioners in the that the density is excessive and that traffic is a problem. Chairman Stout stated that he could not make a decision on this project without the requirement for a focused Environmental Impact Report. Motion: :Moved by Stout.that an Environmental Impact Report be prepared for this project focusing on the issu�!s of iand use, traffic and circulation, and density and additionally should identify other land use alternatives. Motion seconded by Barker, carried unanimously. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: STOUT, BARKER, CHITIEA, MMIIEL, REMPEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried F -3B City September n 5. 198(. \ Page 5 ' 5. ADVERT: SED PUBLIC Pr_ARIYCS 5A. APPEAL OF PLANNING CONMISSTON DECISION DE`. ?ING DEVELOPMENT _____ 54 OR (I R.. J. !*MSTMEyIS - The development of a 126 unit apartment complex on 9.03 acres of land in the Medi= Residential District (8 -14 du /ac), located on the vast side of Baker, south of Foothill - An 207- 580 -57, 58 and APN 207 - 571 -79. A{plicant had requested the item be withdrawn. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing in case someone had come to address the issue. Addressing Council vas: Sherry Konya stated she had come to address the item and was pleased this had been vithdravn. She would take this ia£orar,on back to ihs homeowners. There being no further public response, Mayor Mikels closed the public hearing. ACTION: Item had been withdraw by applicant. 53. APPEAL OF PLANNING COM?fISSI07 DECISION TO REQUIRE A FOCUSED E:viRONMENIAL (t IMPACT REPORT FOR DEVELOPMElT REVLE"J 84 -22 - 9ENTS7"7 - The Cevelopmert of a 924 unit apartment complex to be built in 3 phases on approximately 58.3 acres o= Land- on the north side of Highland Avenue, east of Raven in the '-21 Development District - A. °N 202- 2TI -59, 60. Staff report presented by Rick Comex. City Plodder. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council were: John Manaeriao, representing Lan Bentsen Interest, stated they were here to ® determine whether or mot the Plarr..az Cox3213310c vas in error in requiring a focused environmental impact rrnnrt specifically on the issues of .and use, traffic and circulation, deaS:ty, and the .^eatification of ocher Land uses. Also to determine whether or not it woul: nave been more appropriate to give a negative declaration or to consider whether or noc the resolutions of those issues are core appropriately determined is design review and not in environmental review. Thev were requesticg that they be allowed to proceed to design review sicoI they felt the project complied with the General Plan pursuant to an En. irdnmental !=pact Reporc certified hg the City Council in 1981. I7dald 'Ling, planning consultant located at 9375 Archibald Avenue, addressed the issue of -Adequacy of information. The City did have an Environmental Impact Report prepared by Sedway Cooke is 1979 and 1980 that was certified by the City in 1980. There was a stut, area which included this project site from approximately Highland avenue to the northern city limits frog' Haven Avenue to Milliken Avenue. The immediate project vicinity projected 1200 plus apartment units which should coca in under somt growth management procedure by which the urban facilities and services required could No provided, there would be no significant impact. heir proposal is for 329 units. They felt that 1200 units would not create a significant impact and thtt same information is still valid. A traffic analysis was dome at the same time by US Assoeia:ea, transportation engineers,: for the circulation element of the General Plan. For this particular area they found no significant traffic and transportation i=Psct. 'Relative to land use alternatives, the State law states that if you do it LIR 7013 moat look so alternatives. For the Emvimamental Assessment which is required by the City, they felt vent beyond and provided a report equivalent to a draft environmental impact report. F -39 Cif Council :!inuces Se� nber S, 1984 2a 6 Lou Bentsen, Chairman of the Board of Ua 9eatseo Interest, develop, . of apart quality family communities. They tell they were not the typical apartment developer. They provided high - quality, multi - family . long -term housing for people vca could not afford homes. Developmemea include level o �on -site bath ises. aad parameter security system., substantiaL Level of on -site amenities. The first site in California which they chose co develop i. was saacho Cucamonga. They first did determined they wanted to be here, hired consult their research, doing everything right. acts Co be sure they vere proceed is a They want to be provided the opportunity to proce tiaely fashion to perform as they would like to. Jack Sylvia ter, former owner of the property who sold the property co Ua Bentsen. He urged Council to considering letting this project Ao forward. ltz. 4daneriao requested that a negative declaraeioa be issued For this Project. and that is be placed on the next design review hearing so they MAY proceed with Geaign modifications if necessary. David Barker. vice to o chairman of the Planning Connissioa, stated that the uncil. ag Commission felt strongly about their decision and recommendation to Cou The Flaming Commission does not always co-� ;o an unaaimaus decision, but is this instance their decision van made on a 5-D vote, Thee questioned the adequacy of the information so they have asked that a ;bird party, an independent agent, present a they EIa is the areas outlined in the staff report. Dennis Stout Amiss i , Chairman of the 7laaaing Commission, stated the dlaaaiag on foie very strongly about this project. He stressed that they needed the ?rope: tools to of zectively evaluate to uphold the 'Planning Commisszom,s decision to this I'd encouraged Council require a focused EI&. Bruce Ann Hahn, 9910 La vine Street, Alta Loma, stated that she had attended pre neighborhood neat sags vhea Lan Bentsen had their traffic engineer present_ :hen he vas make: .:.at the best way vas co move the traffic out of there, he answered chat �ltinately the :eat way would be to no through the the phial site and uz in through the project. This does not shoe up on the plane at this Haven. In Exhibit 3 of the traffic ana_ysishic doe show going out onto felt this area should be at -died because of the additioaal_his a ?„ion. She the Sceraaka, 6211 Phillips way, expressed that the City has already gone through the General Plan and EIS approval process. Specific site plan mitigative measures 'for circulation. Cosign issues and relationship co surrounding uses should be dome in design aad development review. This is the process which needs to be fo L lowed. The env ironmeacal sasessmenta Cave shown ;he information which 'eAs necessary to cake tae project to the aezx ,cep and it is a moral obligation for the City co to seriously to the why they would refuse at this poi to not 41iow the project to go forward to the lnreview. pcoce sa. Conceres of the residents can be met through design ,twit,. Darrell Nicalsy, 6245 DeCOts, $Pokes== for the neighborhood, stated they were concerned about the density level in that area, and feel that in 1980 when the General ey f was adopted bat in the past 4 -5 years there have been many thaagea. They feel the area does not warrant this type of development right now and felt =here should be an EIa should be done. James Barton, 552 C:aistel, Barton Deve lopmeat. expressed that the City has gone througa master planning and ec•virenmental impact re?rzts in order to do Planning fd'r f�icity growth. As the City grows, changes Occur. The City Council and Pt areas and C°mmiasioa has with" say n its power to review sew these there is a change which is taking place froc what our aoriginal latent vas. As a result, we must look at the specific areas and reas at- our question decision of the past. The City Council should decide which areas at- is gnestioa aad make them s y publicly so a developer will before scud areas, prep sake it scow know before re purchases the property. Darreli Nicolay also apposed the shopping center which was supposed to go is adjacent to the apartment complex. Be felt there were too many shopping censers is that .tea, F - lit ' City Council Minutes September 5, 1984 Page 7 _ car. gotten, expressed opposition of the requirement of the EI3 and felt the development should prcceed. Chris Sorcarol. 6214 Palinda Street, did not vast apartments or multi family units near his hone. lhere being to further response, Mayor Mikels closed the public hearing, Councilman Zing expressed concern as it relates to transportation, ingress, and egress, but was not sure an EI3 was necessary to get this iaformatiom since the i.n£ortsatton could be provided by further study by staff and more information Provided by the applicant. Mayor Mikels read the ranort and was concerned basically with traffic. He felt there was coo much traffic coming out onto Lemon Avenue. He felt he needed Bare information regarding this before he could make a decision. Councilman Dahl stated he had problems regarding the project as a whola and the balance of density within the project and how it will 4.mpact the surrounding areas. On one hand he supported the Planning Commission's decision but on the other band he could net set why require an EI3 on the project when he felt the Problems could be mitigated in design review and Planning Commissaoa !eve!. He did want Council adhere to the Master Storm Crain Plan for this project. :favor Mikels stated there are four areas identified which were concerns by the Planning Commission which were: land use, density, traffic /circulation, and alternative land uses. She EI3 for the General Plan was done specifically to identify alternative Land uses. It does not take an EIi to identify density and Land use alternatives. Sowever, he needed =are information for traffic and circulation. Councilwoman '.;ri3ht felt the only question was that the Planning Commission felt so strongly that they needed it that it was requested on a 5-0 vote. ® Shereiore, it should be granted. Courcilran Buquet expressed he had some concerns with the project, but cot to the extent that me felt that a focusee =13 needed to be dome. MOTION: Moved by King to grant the a?Pellamt's appeal as it relates to lard use, density, and other land use alternatives; deny appellant's appeal mad affirm the Planning Commission's decisiem as it relates to traffic and circulation; and require a focused EIl for this one issue. Motion failed for lack of a second. Mr. Hannerimo stated that Council has only raised questions relating to design, not concerns which would be the subject of an environmental impact retort. MOTION: •moved by King, seconded by Buquet to upheld the appeal as it relates to land use, density, and alternative land uses, but require am independent analysis of the traffic and circulation element of the development and that cue ctalysis Can occur at the same time as the planting and design process and that the Planning Car=irsiot can proceed with a negative declaration. Council asked Mr. Stout if this would provide the Planning Comission the infur3tieu they needed. Mr. Stout felt the traffic and circulation information would. be needed before the development review. Mr. King stated the intent of the motion was that everything should not case to . a screeching halt while the analysis was being dons. MOTION: Previously made by King, seconded by Buquet was passed by the following vote: ALES: Buquet. Mikels, Dabl. King NOES: Wright e e � e • F - 'A\ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIVIONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: December 7, 1984 TO: Tim Beedle, Senior Planner FROM: Paul A Rougeau, Traffic Engineer, SUBJECT: REVISFD FNV72nNmrNTAl acc =ccMrkr Cr CUCAA � t. ?n �A t—y Z 1> 197; Background: In July, the Planning Commission held a public hearing for the purpose of determining the adequacy of the environmental assessment on the Lynnhaven project. At that time, the Commission considered the assessment prepared by the applicant's planner, Donald King and expressed concern about the project's impact with respect to land use, density and circulation. The attached copy of the July 25 staff report provides a summary of the contents of the original environmental assessment. The minutes of that meeting are also attached, listing the concerns cf the Commissioners. The decision of the Commission to require a Focused EIR examining land use, density and circulation was appealed to the City Council by the applicant. The Council's decision regarding the appeal was to require additional information on circulation, including a look at other densities, but not necessarily conforming to the requirements of an Environmental Impact Report. Additional Circulation Study The City contracted with the firm of Donald Frischer and Associates to provide an expanded traffic study for the project. This study estimated the traffic impacts that would result from the development of Lynnhaven and other known potential projects in the vicinity, and to recommend any needed mitigation measures. Traffic conditions were examined at two points: 1) completion of Phase 1, 316 units, by 1986 and, 2) project completion and full occupancy in 1981 of all 934 units. A copy of this report is included herewith. Pages 6 and 7 show the additional development assumed to be in place at these times and contributing to the traffic volumes in the area. Specifically, this expanded report, �analyzed the effect of all this development upon the traffic volumes on Haven Avenue, Lemon Avenue and the Signalized intersections on Haven Avenue with Lemon, Highland and 19th. The report does not comment on the subjective aspect of neighborhood tolerance of traffic levels since this is "-not within the scope of an engineering analysis. Neither does the report examine conditions at buildout of the Foothill and General Plans because of the great time span between that date and the planned completion of the Lynnhaven project. F'Ii; 11 E Memo to Tim Beedle Revised Environmental December 7, 1984 ® Page 2 Assessment for Development Review 84 -22 Circulation Study Conclusions The study has concluded that, with the recommended street improvements, traffic associated with Lynnhaven plus other proposed residential and commercial developments would be accommodated at acceptable levels of service during peak traffic hours (the so- called "rush hours "). This conclusion is based on the assumption that 75% of Lynnhaven traffic will be destined to the west and south and that the initial phase of the project will send all its traffic througn the LemonlHaven intersection. The complete project will send 36% of its traffic during rush hours directly south to Highland Avenue. A reduction in the development density to 14 units per acre was examined and found to have no significant affect on the level of traffic service. This is because of the predominance of the traffic from other development. However, Lynnhaven will be responsible for 45 to 50% of the traffic on Lemon Avenue, if Lemon does not extend east to Milliken Avenue. Alternative access to Lynnhaven from Haven Avenue is discussed on Page 19 of the report. Such access would be undesirable because of its affect on the shopping center, the conflicts generated between the two traffic types and the impact upon Haven Avenue of the second access point. The alternatives of an access to Highland Avenue would take traffic off of Lemon Avenue, as mentioned above, and it is recommended at the east end of the project. Mitigation Measures The study recommends the following mitigation measures for circulat ?on: First Phase (1986) Haven Avenue and Highland Avenue Both approaches of Highland Avenue at Haven Avenue should be widened to provide left -turn lanes for eastbound and westbound traffic. The westbound approach should be widened additionally to provide a right - turn lane. The existing traffic signal should be modified to provide a left -turn phase for westbound traffic and the potential to add left -turn phases for the other approaches in the future. Install traffic signal at Lemon and Haven. Staff recommends an additional +measure to reduce off -peak traffic on Lemon Avenue. This Mould be to provide a pedestrian access into the adjacent shopping center which would incorporate additional parking beyond the normal guest ratio. This would encourage driving to that point from elsewhere in the project, thus producing a greater usage of the pedestrian access, F —�j Memo to Tim Beedie Revised Environmental Assessment for Development Review 84 -22 December 7, 1984 Page 3 Subsequent Phases (1991) Haven Avenue and Lemon Avenue On the westbound approach, designate one lane for left- turning movements and one lane for left- turning or straight movenents, at the driver's options. If feasible, widen the roadway to provide a right -turn lane. That lane would not be needed for capacity considerations, but would be a convenience. On the northbound approach, stripe the existing roadway to provide a right -turn lane in addition to the two straight - movement lanes and the left -turn lane. Modify the traffic signal to provide three phases: one for all eastbound traffic, one for all westbound traffic and one for all northbound and southbound traffic. Haven ,Avenue and Highland Avenue Widen the eastbound roadieay east and west of the intersection to provide a second straight- moven'�ait lane. Stripe the existing northbound roadway to proti:de a third straight - movement lane from south of 19th Street to north )f Highland Avenue. Modify the traffic signal to provide left -turn phasing for all four approaches. Haven Avenue and 19th Street Restripe the existing northbound roadway to provide a third straight - movement lane from south.-to. 19th Street to north of Highland Avenue. Stripe a southbound right -turn lane within the existing roadway. Construct a southbound left -turn lane within the existing median. Rider, the westbound apprcach to provide a second left -turn lane. Modify the traffic signal to provide left -turn phasing for eastbound a,ind westbound traffic. REC01MDATI011 It is recommended %that the Commission evaluate the new circulation information. If the mitigation measures, along with any added ones the Commission deems necessary, are sufficient, then the staff may be directed to prepare the necessary environmental documentation for Commission consideration prior to project approval. PAR: jaa F -'Ali Attachment t L t i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA a � z Y` �1 I 1' a Ja e a ti -antv3nv F- d t LANE- C0WF1 CW?4 710 " Fo.2 1991 H1716.9T1oN L6'mcAll EIiaYE/Y - '/ /GHLANO�HRVEN 1 N Z O i a W � 1 i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA a � z Y` �1 I 1' a Ja e a ti -antv3nv F- d t LANE- C0WF1 CW?4 710 " Fo.2 1991 H1716.9T1oN L6'mcAll EIiaYE/Y - '/ /GHLANO�HRVEN U_ J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAUVIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 12, 1984 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara K.ra.11, Engineering Technician 19777 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8815 - A -M COMPANY - A division of 22.41 acres of land into 2 parcels in the Low Medium (4 -8 du /ac) Development District lo:ated on the west side of Beryl Street, south of 19th Street (APN 202-032-30,31) I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of Parcel Map. B. Purpose: To divide 22.41 acres of land into 2 parcels. Parcel 2 of which is the site for the development of future Tract No. 12830. C. Location: West side of Beryl Street approximately half way between 19th Street and Baseline Road. D. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 - 1.0 acre Parcel 2 - 21.41 acres Total TFIT acres E. Existing Zoning: Low - Medium (4 -8 du /ac) Development District. F. Existing Land Use: Existing egg ranch. G. Surrounding Land Use: North - Residential Tract N-. 12414 is under construction. South - Existing single fm. 'y : Alta Loma High School. East - Existing single family. West - Existing single family. H. Surrounding General Plan and Development Code Designations: t.ui I& South — wM - Low I.c —t (2 -4 uw ca. du /ac East - Low (2 -4 du /ac West - Low (2 -4 du /ac Development District. Development District. Development District. 1. Site Characteristics: This site slopes approximately 3% to the south and east. The majority of the site is vacant, with an existing egg ranch and accompanying structures on the northeast portion. ITEM G PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Environmental Asssessment z-_d Parcel Map 8815 December 12, 1984 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: Parcel I will contain two existing single family residences and a building used for egg sales. The portions of the existing storage building and the chicken coups which cross the proposed parcel line shall be removed prior to the recordation of the Final Parcel Map. Parcel 2 is to be developed as Tract No. 12830 which is on tonight's Commission agenda as Item K. The street improvements for Beryl Street fronting Parcel 1 are to be completed as a requirement of the Parcel Map. The portion fronting Parcel 2 shall be completed upon the development of Parcel 2. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Also attached for your review and consideration is Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Upon completion and review of the Initial Study and field investigation, Staff found no adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the proposed subdivision. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution conditionally approving Tentative Parcel Map 8815 and authorizing the issuance of a Negative Declaration. Respectfully submitted, C7 L :ko Attachments: Map - Tentative Resolution City Engineer's Initial Study & Vicinity Report Q20 -a L u lu 11 CITY OF RANCHO CItijCAMONGA title; `�- � $ ENGINEERING D!VISILIN P.M. 8815 tm � T VICINITY MAP fl��! page I - G. - 3 I i f i r c: me Ra } }}fi�� FW Elipt� t W¢ a�t�• II G C.l ,will • 5 tei�7 III''•' -.. i, i � ' ` Fil cT . •._.i it `_` � ,_�_ ,�' i., i 1 r , + 1 1 �+ j Ak, l I f I r I I: I f I r 11 E RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 8815 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 8815), LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE CF BERYL STREET SOUTH OF 19TH STREET WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 8315, submitted by A & M Company and consisting of 2 parcels, located on the west side of Beryl Street south of 19th Street, being a division of portions of L.-Its 9 & 10, Block 16 of Cucamonga Homestead Association as recorded in Book 6, Page 46, Records of San Bernardino County; and WHEREAS, on September 17, 1984, a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above- described Tentative Map; and 'yERERs, on December 12, 1984, the Planning Commission held a Oily advertised public hearing for th* above- described mao. FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING rONQdISSION RESOLVED AS SECTION 1: That the .following findings have been made: I. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse environmenta impacts and a Negative Declaration is issued on December 12, 1984. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 8815 is approved subject to the recommen a Conditions of Approval pertaining thereto. Q.-S APPROVED AND ADC'PTED THIS 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1984. PANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA,y0NGA BY: Dennis i.. Stout, Chair,en ATTEST: Ric— k Gomez, Deputy ecretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly ar.d regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of December, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANC"n CUCAMONGA RECO?WNDED CONDITIOAS OF APPROVAL LOCATION: West side of Beryl Street TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP: 8815 South o` 19th Street DATE FILED:September 27, 1384 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: being a subdivision NUMBER OF LOTS: 2 of Portions of Lot 9 & 10, Block 16 of GROSS ACREAGE: 22.41. Cucamonga Homestead Assoc. as recorded in ASSESSOR PARCEL NO: 202- 032 -31, Book 6, Page 46, P,ecords of San Bernardino 202--F57-38 County DEVELOPER OWNER ENGINEER /SURVEYOR A & M Company Houtz & Sons Haaland & Assoc, Inc. 111 S. Kramer 6942 Beryl Street 440 W. Court St., Ste 305 Brea, CA 92621 Alta Loma, CA 91701 San Bernardino, CA 92401 Improvv.eent and dedication requirements in accordance with Title 16 of the CA Municipal Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga include, but may not be limited t -0.. the following: Dedications and Vehicular Access 1. Dedications shall be made of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the followins rights -of -way on the following streets: additional feet on additional feet on additional feet on 3. Corner property Tine radius will be required per City Standards. 4. All rights of vehicular ingress and egress shall be dedicated as follows: 5. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all common roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by C.C.&R.s and shall be recorded concurrent with the map. 6, All existing easements lying within future right -of -way are to be quitclaimed or delineated on the map per City Engineer's requirements. 7. Easements for sidewalk for public use shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. Surety X _ 1. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements prior to recording for ?arcel No. 1 and prior to building permit issuance for Parcel No. 2 _ 2. A lien agreement must be executed prior to recording of the map for the following: 3. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed, guaranteeing completion of all on -site drainage facilites necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Divison prior to recording for and /or prior to issuance of building permit for Street Improvements Pursuant to the City of 16.36.120, the subdivider the City guaranteeing the and /or building permit iss Ranch Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title 16, Section may enter into an agreement and post security with required construction prior to recordation of the map uance. 1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. paverent, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights ou all interior streets. 2. A minimum of 26 -foot wide- pavement within a 40 -foot wide dedicated right -of -way shall be constructed for all half - section streets. X 3. Construct the following missing improvements: Prior to recordation for Parcel No. 1 Prior to building permit issuance for Parcel No. 2 Curb & A.C. Side- Drive Street Street A.C. Median Street Name Gutter Pvmt. Wal% Appr. Trees Lights Overlay Island* Other Bervi Y. V A X X X X X *Includes landscaping ana irrigation on meter 40 Drainage and Flood Control 1. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall he required and shall be delineated or noticed on the final map. 2. Adequate provisions shall be made nor acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 3. The following storm drain shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 4. Prior to recordation of the map, a hydrologic and drainage study for the project shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review. A drainage detention basin per City Standards shall be constructed to detain increased runoff G X 4. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, is fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any' other permits required. X 5. Street improvement plans shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. 6. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. X 7. Existing lines of 12KV or less fronting the property shall be undergrounded. X 8. Install appropriate street name signs, traffic control signs, striping and markings with locations and types approved by the City Engineer. X 9. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. lights shall be on decorative poles with underground service. X 10. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permit. 11. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Jndersidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards. Drainage and Flood Control 1. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall he required and shall be delineated or noticed on the final map. 2. Adequate provisions shall be made nor acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 3. The following storm drain shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 4. Prior to recordation of the map, a hydrologic and drainage study for the project shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review. A drainage detention basin per City Standards shall be constructed to detain increased runoff G Gradinq X 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted �d grading practices. The 'final grading plan small be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading plan. X 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by tFe State of California to perform such work prior to issuance of building permit. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application or grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Grading Committee and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit whichever comes first. X 5. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of building permit. General Requirements and Approvals X 1. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: CaiTrans for San Bernardino County Flood Control District X Cucamonga County Water District for sewer and water San Bernardino County Dust Abatement ( required prior to issuance of a gracing permit) Other 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (C.C. &R.$) approved by the City Attorney is required prior to recordation cf the map. X_ 3. Provide all utility services to each lot including sewerage, water, electric power, gas and telephone prior to street constructon. X s. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. 5. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CalTrans /San Bernardino County Flood Control District. X _ 6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. C--,' \o 1] El X 3- The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. 8. Local and Master Planned Trails shall be provided in accordance with the Trail Plan. A detailed trail plan indicating widths, maxinum slopes, physical conditions, fencing and weed control, in accordance with City trail standards, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to recordation for and /or prior to building permit issuance for 9. Prior to recording, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District 82 -1 among the newly treated parcels. X 10. At the time of final map submittal, the following shall be submitted: Title Report, traverse calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and /or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. SPECIAL CONDITIONS ® X I. The portions of the existing buildings which will cross the new parcel lines shall be removed prior to recordation of the Parcel Map. X 2. Parcel No. 1 shall be regraded or a drainage facility provided which prevents drainage from Parcel No. 1 entering onto Parcel No. 2 or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer prior to recordation of the Parcel Map. CITY OF PJll ci0 Cd1CA!lC m LLOYD B. HUBBS, CITY ENGINEER 0 by E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL. STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environiental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the initial S* The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to.be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: A M Company 111 S. Kraemer Brea CA (71111Qgn 1200 NAMZ, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Cary Mitchell, Haaland 6 Associates, Inc. 440 W. Court Street San Bernadino, CA 92L01 (7 4)$85 -7750 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) 6942 Beryl Street LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: None C�— \ D� J 11 EJ ( PROJECT DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Residential subd 22.41 ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND, SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF A*T= : 22.41 Acres DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMZLS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF !--NY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): The site is ¢enerally level w °tn a slight, (2 -3%) slope to the south and east. The site is undeveloped, barren land, w;rh an es;crino nor;r„lr,ere eQC ranch which will be removed by the oronosed develcp_aent. The site west. Uto „.oma hign..Jcnooi as the subject property. site at r Is tie project part of a larger project, one of a series of c=ulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? The site currently has not significai,t. flora, fauna, or cultural resources which would be impacted by the proposeu uevelopment. Existing structures consist of several poultry houses, field storage bins, and several smdll accessory structures. In addition to the above, there are two residential dwelling units and a commercial egg salesbuilding currently existing on the the property. The development plan anticipates removal of the egg ranch Q=' - \3 Page I -Z cent. r...1 LJ facilities. The two single family residances will remain on a I -acre parcel to be created in the northeast corner of the subject property. The subject property is devoided of swwaf!j, wildlife, or other environmental resourceswhich would be affected by the proposed development. heJ'4 c�P� A ptcc:t�srf./� I;z fv !s ex,s�i'vty �I�rus ac,ci �LJ Cd 17�,� S �ri?�i �:t �fi,,i� c� 7�•P �� i^r,)k;; �, {,v 1�; f l� W W I I �'q 1 'fWe'' JOJ (:�-xy 11 WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO X 1. Create a substantial chance in ground contours? _ X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? _ X 3. Create a substantial charge in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5. Remove any existing trees? flow manv? X _ 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? 41 Explanation of any Yrc answers above: Ir IM- DORTANT: If z e project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I herebv certify that the statements furnished above and in tine attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct -to the best of rzy knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Review Co.7maittee. Date !) Signature w Z'X/a���,� Title Haaland & Associates, Inc. k RBSIDENTIPL CONSTRUCTION The following inforsaation should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to acco=aodate the proposed residential development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: A X Company Specific Location of Project: 6942 Beryl Street 1- Number of single f ly u.-iits: 2- Nu.:,3er of - nultiple familp units: 3- Date proposed to becin construction: 4- Earliest date of occupancy: Model 4 and R of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price Rance 2 N/A 3 4 PF;.SE I PEASE 2 PFASE 3 PHAS£ 4 TOTAL, ]03 C 10/84 1/85 Of Dwelling Units 30 °4 aaproximate 40 Q, —1 (C, i r 0 r U E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 12, 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Linda D. Daniels, Associate Planner IMN SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12830 - A -M proposed subdivision to create 03 rest entia otT s on 21.41 acres in the Low Medium (LM) District (4 -8 du /ac) located generally on the west side of Beryl Avenue and north of Base Line Road - APN 202- 032 -30, 31. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a subdivision, site plan, and TUIlding elevations. B. Purpose: Development of a 103 single family lot subdivision. C. Location: Cle west side of Beryl Avenue and north of Base Line Road. D. Parcel Size: 21.41 acres. E. Existing Zoning: Low !tedium Residential - 4 -8 du /ac. F. Existing Land Use: A chicken ranch. G. Surrounding Land Use and Zonin North - Single Family Residential (under construction); Low Medium Residential. South - Single Family Residential; Low Residential. East - Single Family Residential; Low Residential. West - Single Family Residential; Low Residential. H. General Plan Desi nations: Project Site - Low Medium Residential. North - Low Medium Residential. South - Low Residential. East - Low Residential. West - Low Residential. I. Density: 4.87 du /ac. ITEM H PLANNING COMlMISSION EA & TT 12830 - A -M December 12, 1984 Page 2 STAFF REPORT Company J. Site Characteristics: The subject site is presently developed as a chic en ranch which will be removed when development occurs. The site drains and slopes to the south and east. H. ANALYSIS: A. General: The subject proposal is an infill development and the density of the Low Medium Development District is sli htly h?�her than that of the surrounding (west, east and south Low Residential Development District. For this reason the project is required to adhere to the large notification sign procedures recently established by the City Council. The project intends to establish 103 lots for single family detached development purposes. The size of units vary between the range of about 1,600 sq. ft. to about 1,950 sq. ft. and both one story and two story units are proposed. B. Desian Review Committee: he Design Review Committee has reviewed the project and has favorably recommended its approval. During the DRC's analysis the members did express concern regarding the design proposal of the cul -de -sac and the lots in the northwest, area of the site. The members felt that the lots abutting the existing single family development should be rear -on situations. The members also expressed the concern that the number of driveways (six) appeared to make the cul -de- sac rather congested. Other concerns of the DRC included the setbacks of the side -on lots at the northerly terminus of the two northisouth cul -de -sacs and the design of the Beryl Street decorative wail. In addressing the DRC comments the applicant has redesigned the cul -de -sac to eliminate one lot, as well as providing for rear - on lot situations abutting the existing single family development. Other conditions have been added for your consideration to insure that the DRC recommendations are carried out. C. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee has reviewed the project and has favorably recommended its approval. The Committee has requested that specific conditions be placed on the project to insure compliance with the codes and standards of the City. These conditions have been included on the Resolution for the Commission's consideration. D. Grading Committee: The Grading Committee has recommended approval of the Tentative Tract Map subject to certain modifications dealing with the grading and drainage. Conditions have been added for your consideration regarding the Grading Committee's concerns. tA -a 11 PLANNING COKMISSION EA & TT 12830 - A -M December 12, 1984 Page 3 STAFF REPORT Company E. Required Pedestrian Easement: Pursuant to the requirement by the City Counc-il tat a twelve —foot pedestrian easement be provided in the northwest area of the tract, the applicant has provided a solution acceptable to staff. The easement design, wall design, landscaping, lighting, sidewalk design must still be reviewed and approved by staff. The maintenance of the easement is proposed by the applicant to be maintained by the Homeowners Association of Tract 12726 to the north. F. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was held on November 26, 1984 at the Carnelian Elementary School. Approximately 20 interested residents attended the meeting. A brief synopsis of the meeting's discussion is attached for your review. G. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist and h,s found no significant environmental impacts as a result of this project. Issuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the General +-;d Develop :; nt C_de Tke nroje `t will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use, building design and site plan, together with the recommended Conditions of Approval are in compliance r •h the applicable provisions of the Development Code and City Standards. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The ep Dail. Ry ort as a public rearing. In addition., notices were sent * *c, all property owners within 300 feet of the project site advertising the public hearing. To date, no correspondence has been received regarding the project. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Comr.ssion issue a Negative Declaration and approve Tentative Tract Ma; 12830 Oy adoption of the attached Resolution and Conditions of Approval. s Rick City la r ±RS:ID:ns [U W -3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EA & TT 12850 - A-M Company December 12, 1984 Page 4 Attachments: E:.hibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Subdivision Map Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Exhibit "D° - Grading Plan Exhibit "E" - Building Elevations Exhibit "F" - Floor Plan Exhibit "G" - Neighborhood Meet,._ig Notes Part II, Initial Study Resolution with Conditions of Approval 11 K -y t IL :Lr - • I r.- ....I., - . • .I i" NURM CITY OF � MIN: D1NLtCIC1VONN_ A TM-E . PLANNING U VEO N EX M, M -�S- O F�iCZi B✓f3S� '. f SCALE' a,. PEOESTRiAN ACCESS E95EbiE/dT EMERGENCY ACCESS TR. 12726 I — � 1 t 2 AYALCN •T. f 4 V iN T tit" S 1 2" f _ IJ , � V aa _ � s ,SPEC— TMA�NN —ACCESS C •a .' s<. NORTF r u Z;I iY OF rrEM, - -77 SAN 0 CUCANIONGA : A, srr � ?LANNU14G LIVEMI t cHIB� I Z a SCALE: IYYII % % % %%% C FY OF rrE%1- 'iTIZ83d�. RANCHO CUCAlV ONGA T'a•II•E- ojeazpm� Pz.4m _ A.ANNI NG DIVISION Ea'l;-=7: *D" SCALE -�� H -9 tK� ---- °i • •.M f_i ate/ 4T. JE r r i ?' r a F .iaa a Baia" ►�.l -•� _,y1 �Gj/�`�f'. r..ir•l4 t.. a aa� A■ .• a +qtr �( }I ri- n� '■n a�a fir •� ■�jl ....:�� iii �• tlf tridl�.. . + � ��•�aj.4�a' � � � E h,11�'1�'� yet i t <`nT" ryI ttt: -il y.1 t iL'a�tw,l all j �f N iKa''r_naat < t � •it ' ii R - - ... +Yak1lMFFf� .hl tartJ= aal tE�. MEMO, - _ �• tt 7aaa t{ i VMS s t-i� • I���a�► Ilin ) � s _. tat jp` . • .,:II_: a iaa_�, �1( Ef � ll�;vwaes • • f "fai � f 1• f -.�i ,P _ ' :. 1 . f.. ('1 •'f J h 11 -:.. ll -. 1 Il -Ll Y !.f . � IF l ..'fie _' /•i Itlila�t•�• MIN ,Sr yy r■ E= ° Mill ism �� �' �• .. .� iii 'sue ��'' � _ 1' IN - - if d �e. JI �i a :I. VMS 1 r r 4 i 1 Art . w• ... 11: .h I e � • 11 C KI SU*iARY OF NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 12830 Developers' Representatives: Mr. Mr. Mr. Js. Ms. Mr. Staff Planner Attending: Lin Residents Attending: Bey Bagby John Sauer Steve Rowland Julie Grahm Pat Thorne Gary Mitchell da D. Daniels Refer to Sign -In Sheet (approx. 20 dersonsi The following is a summary of the questions raised at the Neighborhood Meeting for Tentative Tract 12830. The Neighborhood Meeting occurred on November 26, 1984 from 7:30 p.m. to 9:00 p.n. The meeting becan with Mr. Bob Bagby, of the A -M Company, giving a brief introduction -and overview of the project being discussed. Question: What is the range of square footages for the homes? Answer: Between 1,600 and 1,950 square feet. Question: What will the b4 the mix between 1 story and 2 story units? Answer: For every 1 story unit, there will be approximately three 2 story units, thus the mix will be, more or less, a ratio of 1:3. Question: How is the pedestrian walkway required by the City C;uncil going to be handled? There will its location be? Answer: It was explained by Mr. Bagby that the final design had not been resolved yet. Mr. Bagby explained that the A -M Company would like to see the pedestrian walkway occur in the northwest corner of the site, but did qualify this by stating that the design had not been reviewed by City Staff. Question: How many elevations will be provided for each floor plan? Answer: There will be three different elevations and color schemes for each floor plan, thus a total of twelve different architectural eievations will be provided. In addition, each 2 story home will have a 3 -car garage, and the 1 story home will have a 2 -car i garage. Ques.trion: What will be the material used for perimeter fencing? Answer: In all cases, it will be wood, and when necessary, a wood ,fence wi'il be on top of a retaining wail. H -t-1 Question: Will parkways be provided in the development? Yes Answer: - 7ie City standard requires a parkway which include a 4 ft. minimum sidewalk and approximately an 8 ft. area for parkway trees. The parkways on the interior of the site will be maintained -by the. individual homeowner; the parkway on Beryl will be maintained by an Assessment District. Question: Will there be 2 -story units adjacent to the existing single - family residences? Answer:. Yes. There will be 2 -story units adjacent to the existing single - family residential homes. The developer qualified this by stating that all attempts have been made to minimize the impact of 2 story homes on the (,xisting single family homes. This has been done through providing the least amount of grade difference possible and by trying to increase the red-, yard setback to make a greater separation between the snits. :n addition there will be only one window on the rear elevation which would be the master bedroom window. Question Concern Will my view be destroyed? Answer: Mr. Bagby explained that again, all attempts had been made to minimize the impact of the 2 story, and even the 1 story homes, on the single family residence to the south. Note: The homeowner raising this question commented, after Mr. Bagby's explanation, that his concern with his view being impacted by the residence was simply that he understood this would happen at some future time after he bought his home. He indicated that the property couldn't remain vacant forever and that he had been merely spoiled since development had not taken place for some time. Question: Will the utility lines on the south property line area remain? Answer: It was explained that all utilities would be undergrounded that wouid service the project. These utilities would be in an easement along the south property line area. Question: Will there be one or twi walls on the perimeters of the property? Answer: Mr. Bagby explained that where possible, a common wall will be provided. Question: How will Garnet be treated, if it is not to go through? t� Answer: Garret will be walled off. t Question: When athletic events occur on the baseba;l fields of the. high A school, where will parking be provided, if any? it K -1e) Answer: It is the developer's understanding that with the Red Hill Park athletic fields, the athletic events now occurring on the high school fields will be relocatd to the Red Hill Park facility. Thus there will no longer be the parking problem that is presently occurring on La vine and the immediate vicinity. uestion. What will the homes cost? Answer: The price range is expected to be in the $120,000 to $140,000 and $150,000. Mr. Bagby explained that these are single family homes, oriented for those persons with children (2 to 3 children). Question: When is construction anticipated to begin? Answer: April or May. Question: In the northwest area of the tract, there are two lots that have side on forms of design. Why is this not a rear yard to rear yard situation? Answer: Although it has side yard design fa,;;ing rear yard design, with the 12 foot pedestrian access easement earlier explained, there would be approximately 17 feet of separation in the one lot on the north. There would be only 5 feet separation for the second side on lot design to the south. Question: How is dust control to he handled during construction? Answer: The area will be watered on a daily basis to help control dust. Question: What will the interiors contain? Will they have vaulted ceilings? Answer: The interiors will have vaulted ceilings in the 2 story units only. Mr. Bagby then proceeded to give a brief explanation of what the interiors were like. . question: Will there still be access to the high school? Answer: There will be no pedestrian walkway through the projec? to the high school, but there will be convenient access through the service road already existing just west of the site. That concluded the question and answer period for the Neighborhood Meeting. A A resident then explained that he thought the project would upgrade the Pill neighborhood, and was, in general, very pleased with the effort that the A -M } Company had made in the development plans. C IL ►J� CITY OF "'ANCEO CUCAMONGa PART II - INITIAL STUDY 7aR0N',MN- TAL CHECKLIST DATE : %2&Gtr7ll�c.l' ' 15, ige4 APPLICANT: P -Iii Ccmpony J FILLCG DAia:_hkVeMb-r 14, 11384 LOG bi3MiER: TT 12330 _ PROJECT: 103 I" bin le sv42j'v:'sttrn PRC?`CT LOCATION: U%s ! Sf M& N!e Baseline Rcad I. MrVIRON.MNTAL I`2ACTS (Explanation of all "yes" ann "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets). kA -moo YES MAYBE NO 1. Soils and Geolozv. Will the proposal have significant xesuits in: a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? b. Disruptions, displac,�a.ents, compaction or burial of the soil? ✓ c. Change in topography or ground surface contour inter•als? d. The destruction, :c -7ering ox "odifics:tion of any pique geologic or physical features? v e. An- potential increase in wind cz rater er;,sioa of soils, affecting either on or off site cone-tor-s? f. ;:%-•nges in erosion siltation, or deposition? g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes. landslides, rud- slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? � h. An increase in the rate of - xtracti =n andlor use o< any mineral resource? 2. Hydrology. Will the proposal have significant results in: kA -moo Page 2 a. Constant or periodic air e= fissions from mobile or indirect sources? Stationary sources? b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or interference with the attainment of applicable air duality standards? c. A1_eration of 'ocal or regional climatic conditions, affecting air =v—ent, moisture or tempera! -ure? I b. Biota Flcra. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or number of any species of plants? �- b. geduction of the ssmbers of any um %que, r=-,e or endangered spe,_ /es of plants? JL YES MAYBE NO a. Changes in currents n= the course of direction of flowing stre..:s,. i:ers, of ephemeral strea= channels? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water ranoff? y c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any body of water? a/ e. Discharge into surface waters, or any alteration of surface water quality? tiJ f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? g. Change in the quay ity of groundwaters, either through direct additions or with - "rawals, or through interference with an aquifer? Quality? 'Zuantity? b. The reduction_ in the amount of water other- wise available for public water supplies? i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or seiches? 3. Air Ouality. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Constant or periodic air e= fissions from mobile or indirect sources? Stationary sources? b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or interference with the attainment of applicable air duality standards? c. A1_eration of 'ocal or regional climatic conditions, affecting air =v—ent, moisture or tempera! -ure? I b. Biota Flcra. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or number of any species of plants? �- b. geduction of the ssmbers of any um %que, r=-,e or endangered spe,_ /es of plants? JL ?age 3 YES uaYZE NO C. Introduction of new or disruptive species of plants into.an area? d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural production? V Fauna. Will t'ie proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or numbers of any species of animals? b. Reduction oz cr.e numbers of any unique, rare or endar,ered species of animals? c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or wildlife habitat? 5. Population. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of the F=.an pop::lation of an area? c. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 6. Socio— Economic Factors. Will the proposal have sigr ?Ficant results in: a. Change in local or regional socic- economic characteristics, including economic or cc=ercial diversity, tax rase, and property values? b. Will project costs be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax payers or project users? 7. Land Use and Planning Considerations. Will the proposal have significant results in? J a. A substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an are -' b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, policies, or adopted plans of any governmental entities? J C. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of ssisting cons=ptive or non- ecasuaptive recreatiersl apyortunities? Irk _I:; E E 11 11 B. Transportation. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. :aeration of substantial additional vehicular moveaent? b. Effects on existing streets, or de- nd for dew street construction? c. Effects on existing -drking facilities, or demand for new parking? d. Substantial impact upon existing transporta- tion systems? e. Alterations tc present patterns of circula- tion or moverent of people and /or goods? f. Alterations to or effects cn pres, and potential water — borne, rail, sass .mansit or air traffic ?. Page 4 YES MAYBE NO _ J ,_ %_ Y J g. Increases in traffic hazards to rotor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 9. Cul•_::r.tl Resources. Will the proposal have sigaifi =ant results in: a. A disturbance to the integrity of arcbaeological, paleontological, and/or historical sources? ./ 10. Health. Safety. and Nuisance y ,.cters. Will the proposal have significant resu:rs in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances in the event of an accident? 1 d. An increase in the number of individuals or species of ve_tor or 7athenogenic organises or the exposure of people to such c_ganisas? e. Increase in existing noise levels? f. Exposure of peoplo to potentially dangerous noise levels? '/ S. The creation of obJ ectionable odors? b. An increase in light or glare? tiI F E1 —AS Page 5 a. Use. Of substantial or excessive fuel or ene-^y° b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy? C. An increase in the demand for development of new sources of energy? d. An increase or perpetuation of tha coasumptica of zon- renewable forms of energy, when feasible renewable sources of energy are available? H -a'A -' YES °i6YBE NO 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. The obstruction or degradation Of any scenic vista or view? b. The creation of an aesthetically Offensive site? c. A cOnflict with the objective of desi ^ -: =-'e' or potential scenic corridors? 12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal have a significant seed far new sysrers, or alterations to the following: a. Electric power? J b. Natural or packaged gas? — J c. Cc=unications systems? J d. Water supply? J e. Wastewater facilities? V f. Flood control structures? y g Solid waste facilities? _ h. Fire protection? i. Police protection? J J. Schools? J k. Parks or other recreational facilities? J I. Maintemance of public facilities, including roads and flood control facili!.ies? m. Cther governmental services? 13. Ener�y and Scarce Resources. Will the propesal have significant remits in: a. Use. Of substantial or excessive fuel or ene-^y° b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy? C. An increase in the demand for development of new sources of energy? d. An increase or perpetuation of tha coasumptica of zon- renewable forms of energy, when feasible renewable sources of energy are available? H -a'A -' r1 L�J Ll Page 6 YES MAYBE NO e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or scarce natural resource? J 14. Haudatary Findings of Sigaifi•.ance. a. Doe:; the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short -term, to the disadvantage of long -term, environmental goals? (A short -term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long- term impacts will endure well into the future). %/ c. 3oes the project have impacts which are individually liaited, but cumulatively considerable? tC=ulatively considerable means that the incremental effects of an individual project -re considerable when viewed In connection with the effects of pt : projects, and probable future projects). d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beicgs, either directly or indirectly? II. DISCUSSION OF_ENMOWME"- . E9AICATION (i.e., of affirmative answaxs to the above questions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures). tx -as III. DETMMINATION Page 7 on the basis of this initial evaluation: T- ; I find the proposed project CG7LD NOT have a significant effect on the easvircnaent, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be pre2ared. _ I find that a7thougi: the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the envir=ent, and an ENVIRCN`,= 111PACT REPORT is required. Date 6'126WUXLGW /5, h?St{ Signature i� -Q6 11 LM RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMNGA, CALIF^RNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12830. WHEREAS, Tentative Tract trap No. 12830, hereinafter "Map" submitted by A -M Company, applicant, for the purpose of si=bdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San i3ernardino, State of California, described as a subdivision of about 21.41 acres of land into 103 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on December 12, 1984; and WHEREAS, the City Pianr -r has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planting Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes tie following findings in Am Am regard to Tentative Tract Na. 12830 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environment,.) damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design.of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. (g) That sh's project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued: H - a-1 Resolution No. Page 2 SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 12830, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and -Lhe attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING• I. The final design of the pedestrian access is subject to the approval of the City Planner and must be completed prior to the map's recordation. 2. The maintenance of the twelve foot pedestrian easenc -it shall be subject to the satisfaction of the City Planner, and done prior to the map's recordation. 3. The setbacks of the northerly units on the 2 north /south cul -de -sacs shall be increased to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 4. The wall design for the decorative wall on Beryl Street shall match the wall design of T:-act 12414 to the north. S. Where possible, on the perimeters, the retaininq walls shall be eliminated and slope banks used to adjust the grade. 5. 4 drainage swale shall be provided along the south prc;;erty line of the adjacent lot in the northeast portion of the site. 7. Lot 103 shall drain to the street, to the satisfaction of the Grading Committee, in order to help reduce the difference in grade elevation.. 8. The developer shall make a good faith effort to contact the surrounding residents so that a cannon si;,gle wall may �e constructed along the perimeter tract property lines. ENGINEERING: 1. Realigminent of the exis *ing storm drain through the eastern portion of the project shall conform to the standards of both the City and the San Bernardino Flood Control District. The manhole proposed to be located within Lot 101 shal's be relocated to the Garnet Street right -of -way to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 2. A modified cul-de -sac shall be designe' and constructed at the north end of Garnet Street to the satisfaction, of the City Eng),.eer. 1A Resolution No- Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12th DAY OF DECEMBER, 1984• PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 61' - Dennis L- tout, airman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, eputy ecretary I, mm Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution nas duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th da.Y of December, 1984, by the fol.owing •.-ote -to -wit: A,ES: CONMISSi.ONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: a :h[ 'y'Q`:, l Oat- iV 17-� �1 z Q i a H y C L C T r v L O V Y ]�> �• >� O O 1 9 1 V n Y r ` O� Y L 6 •w ° ° •� D 9 C • E 0 0� T 9 r� C� 6 P> YF Wp N O ¢6 v • y�y`�= YgN wC rfyJC , wqw 6y0 =as —aC 1a� => �� r 4 ■��4 pC.�9wU JCGJ +�L�^ � =C �C�/.y' i`y yLYC4 OA_CT V+ B L O C r r M C.^ • li6 VOO� YVII'O� N`.•C. � i Y gV` L. VyVy VYnv wuN� —L. °yr c v `a li` ¢ e pY -E�rL :._CTO ^•DV 41�� . = I q Ce giai NZ 4 ►4 P¢O >q¢ Y`YNC p OC.4• a _•• _7 gVrLO C? P C C �C = �Crry= gO.NC ((� o8 VYOr � ^V9y� j4 E�9r„� M =yq ' V _QL'•¢iPVi 9_ N C O O .%W . M C— L L O N yD L �yr °E'�¢ WC9rY 9 >C� 9O� 6Gn V� ,L•qN CC_9L C _ GG +Lr'nt ✓NY `Od �.>�V4 qN P�nu O.r w4y �r Nye M ..CIV p =:5 `!10 •mac . iC> O NqC 9_ C OLI¢C LNn• pCp _PgNN 8z p C >. V•. G O.n 9 9 a) _ y 00 p >�r =� �10.V�•.•. ryCC yg N O ¢r 0`. cc r` S••6` ¢ P O ^ O lrr •° •• N C�j� O Y V O N ���/// q N N C V O Cam Q V r 4�.bir �jC Nr� u yN4 OC dkVL �Nl ir�N�CI O� NIrVNq NO¢ NV�e'V L•"_i NN..N.r�7\ V V ^pIV O l L G 8 8 2 �J 4 OO .i_ ,O• H 6Vr tMr 4r� CO m L6v SLi C L¢ y> b O _I N As f VI C 1 Cl 8 0 Y ti Z O u 4 o � 2 M t D 1 + Y O x J Ye �Z5 •• P rd i •d. Pr L L Viec «oo J O v O « r > TC Iv G�LM d �10O^ W 4 a F V T J r cm C •y C C OI •^� GL« J 401 4d0 CHOC¢O •" C✓ 1 L O p N Y 4 O w O L _ O u N p 1 i 2 GO V C 1> Cyr `` X41 •OOrNL •p 0 V L r ✓ Z_ C r O It P 9 r q, = O .11LO c Y ��iO.�VG ¢w W qL O » O y 2 W ° �• vy F 1IFC� ° ow y Y V 1 =r 2 G � Ni O q p rY orb 6 J J 0 0 ± —I b O Lp O YM [L¢> ICI O V�+ M r i0i O S • �9 •�iw1ML �/_ G �� J N Nf f • h N Z U C cp a.Y o a— mod+ y �+ 0 r Cr v 2 � V C O9 Y p R^ w a r P- C + - d r O ^ + o ur L +Lyrj e7 d r 1 7 V V 0 J V a - n + l 1 V n w O tl tj V r S y V O V Y Y Y ua° w d G w C V w Z L L L i Lp0 n 9 +C qL R o - V i- O 9 woucyyJ .`u LQ y d- d �= c dp a o� N_ °r d J Z V r — � a v .q. ail 0 D Pq ° V y V m •Li. L _ L van S O 2 � j w V p•w+ L >O t' Oq L q V v.L +9 9q �- r =0 . +j 6t V D L p = g -_= criv w - n HC Mp O wl I L- tl Ap m9 L a.g e L Y�r rDCo cL"— r °0 o q W x�i t =^ C ya 2 = L y L ice a' `•�+ ='v c��° Ms ���QMYV L s rpW= N Opw � +pC -• aJr_ Pte_ tlw 0 W «c g 1 V n C n 27 W =C A o a p L .-. � L Q a t I _ N QryQ 004 �r L-e pw.. iyi p•_N+ _my O L C P r L r ^ O a ••M w r C Y p - p M Y^_PC d V C�w �Q r L p O,,- ` O O •' - S Ji i N L- l0 W'mL ° w w� � 09..0. OvM °i!a i•JC.e Ow Wp O V ^O .nmr_6 W a-T CC c'JOnV �.LU .Ji�Y t L.� C N • O u L+.a2 y° y V q S q L L V aw0. l i V L V L C q B� 9 p O q q 0 6 O + O V C +M C � V p6 'CW dOp V yYC pr 'Jq w ° L V O °� dNY 9^ W9_gZ LMq y L n w= > 6 d n.2 On Y M_ + A ^yL� �Up _ -_Y ti�TJ nY�y Lp O y Y C ,CL C e t •� w D r� 5 •fL Y a w p n Y 9 � P P ^ � L L � 0 _ pV O •w i + 0 yw jCY Q _- V G C w l M C 0 w r yV �Q C! g O O r q'LGr� r P E�LII p O.LG Y t L q •w O n p Y 0 ^I l-3a ^ V 0 4 6 2 r b6Y t y 4. r W y V V t ¢ V p g i_ w g Q 9 C 0 q y!> V b � V CD .Jw dC�C C r6C -°•� V W d w V O L T P O > L +?w0 _ a' V L� LOr + <+ ° t ird YO 1 El N E 1 f") �Z�`j VVq>.0 u �O ^'J V 9r V lI V J O C �% CA C ^ate C V prMOV �O� � Y CC 1 r ✓ �./rL M [ Y tl w V 9 L M Y _. V C r V 4� r 9 N G 4) y r r L Y O C C O q O= P ^ W P 4 0� 9 L S 6 =• r N y ! J r V J O O Y r V t rn N O J[ r P O O L V C n i - � C O C c� C Y M Y d V a C e a L M J r Y T l J J •4�V1 .pr OO OTr d pV >r r l yNl uar Tdrw V ✓1[gPC pObyV q �iODa Z r�g9V Q L P� • O C ' CV • _ U � ' rU V � rC[ C YG^ V'Gn� p�+'On AOOV V'[r SC�f '[ DST r �` rd_�u�YC COT N O V>u O -=C 0 c C .i o =r4_ yYD c .y . �y. rw�M �V^ D P u C • RP p Oc - i •ci_ 1 0 a D • I _ V Q••J, L i Cz •e6r O IfrP6 = .a CC .J NDM �oS. - LJPC > y CrV LVV wOd ^ q Tr � G_Pw Cp pLCY G NVQ4 q ....' yCD �.✓ C0 1Cwr pdC+ Nu r yd� Nod.°.r C cw WwW@ �4 'V V =q _ rtOr _ C9�^ =e ��5 iG LP�d �bC L pp M R �e r00 i P 'Y C C_ d QYI T_ � G � d am Y n m O 7_ S � � _� V >- .C-. � PY C ''L. Ld � = N _ .• M NdLq v O V 60rT O9r S wNP ✓d 'O VOJa G O5 dr pu r �' r��� i +d.. N r .yn cd V.G.. • ^- r_y°N gtC�O N� Ct�� V C M V SNG O Oppp T> Y �.YV• 4N C0 =C0`O P�' yS VY -� L TVq LVOe OP�•T MrCa .. • C q r P�oGO q C P J r�9 •'� C's u = w ✓q V T V q C d Or 9 C L • C d • V ! Z` 'Un E V N O 1 Tp w OIZ V` d 3 •rPr V rr Tp ,a _ O• b O t ^� C C r M g C L 3 0^ B O 6PN ON0 V N d V N Cr�gq .� qV C.� rP6�✓ __ wP ! O +uCd P} L w lY NOrVVU NL u YI `_ w IC = .✓ = N� U - r C y yC 4 O Cr'�` •� V V G ^P V L CO NpL V ^r e ^ 49 C V d O ur l 27-Z O p GM yy a: `deC AND c L (N SNVV <•�6 CIr <V L. O'^O.N V.G. Ypi rw q S�� � m W dP OeCr l dYCP C6 PO Y ^d0 4arrL Cu �V OC D Y � P ^OC Oa •G� aOwO CO ^C ^ I.z PL r e L✓ a�� 00 V1 J �M p win _ 'Ly�C n N L PW p ° Y C N V � O V � b V `• � � C �-pr S N ✓ n YO.y O •^10 �'q�Or v.GVu� r •V i N 0= ..r y O. ✓ _P" p- O w T V E r aLr6 ✓ d O dYOi V 6 O .- � •C� NC V La rY� R ✓LOf>d "r OE CI �^ C Op ytl�> .O-C✓ YOL ilk O. 4L -•�pD L x ra Cv ■V • V_ 44 ^N Or �O •9 y �O ~ PN V•At✓ Yp_ r•r(.Y1� L✓ r i� L O �rL 0 r� L✓ • u = q r w �r .� r�pOl P� ^r0•N UTOC a N O r � =C' 1w L C Vy ucc wr �< n�L a��' .� eau .'.. •.ay 1 r= �a rw� W. CFN SI M- O COCCSsr ^`f9 O'pw G qrN`= VOh ��- Vp N OL V JO V �^ Y W `r qu �� Y C Pr V� ^6DY O yM n� GL P•2t G•O �__� GY I pn 9 C r0 r 3. 6 t P r S V n� � LO _ _ r r PC r'E ' V y� Y �> Y � JM L =a pr ¢c LAC V- _ 7 0 Lc •'� 0 �_ YI UM bL^ O. SLYU N O� + 00 Ct.� - • p Oy0 aP� ✓D c6Cr� CwV r rA= V E r rC[rq C O � _r�rC Eve zO VL O Y O T r 1_ L J D y OC V O O Q O M• 9_ l r A= Y Y• �� O r N S OI • l J - y' n w J V- C 0 y C o {p V Y O i [r V w aw • V ' L< y G�� N L 3 M y P P C am 6 V P o w O 5 :5 � � � OaC V U 2L = O =� +l[ >r[1� [1 M8C V w • L yaj -z V L O (_ • y r a r 4 L V'Y r Jr V 9r� �= DGr .J4 L N i• V 5t- Y ` V O• r r r l C L L L R 4 •J 'Y ^r w WVMOni NON +w <M 2M0 rMy'• • W H -33 1 f") C �a E •• �cc c -v c.c ostu cc ca LP a dcY T Q C L b� �✓ C L p . r C r � 9 4 _p y l OIj c 6 4- � • Y � w 9 m C - P` Oj Od�0. l� -EVP Ci OL 00 � 9 •` C�V`o 2 NWT \ ✓ «.r.' = L..L. V q +� i.l a°.+ -yN, � e S � L� V O ^ v O N ` l 9 a ✓ .fie d . l � u a O � S °a` ✓rL.. Ld.p a Nu � K T A Ov � vv NN an 'e .L. d- r Kw-%g i•°, =+ ^agar �i •° ° `uvZ G °b vv d �° `e- U —O —� —A pc T - yu 4 W 9� V g � y � ✓�� u S r r✓ \� . u y L p V G r O N co..Eg \� � �i..�a i nN cC Y� � a•rd � m .eVVN �E�r y,n •� �w y ��� pV y L rn tv99 Lw� = yF. V O � L q 6 G L d -U oz; •. = J d C Q V = '11 O N 6Y� z-1 A0.9 W Vt0! 3G O'S O.2 9t O� C V 4 _ u r V d 0_ • \ r -LOO y. �L• r VLL 6_O` Cq .7 v •I 0_ CCC 2�: mw c c Yv r- E c�� � 2 c N I o` cq c S.= G VECVE 2-1 W -1-13 uu � N ..° L Yy r — °cam gJ C pG e d G L c -C W Y 1z, wP� u G �..T. o o O Y ` o5Y- Vv � 3 -� 6 ✓ e Y L G q V yc6, y y r Q N c O. Q T a L V ^ N C ^ t- O r L- Y N O C O O V O C .. 7- V C V V m a y 6' y P 9 u y CC = 2 C .Ti - Y G 0 O � c y C O M c L O� r V C\ L O` � a V •L g 1G u 6 r � d Q 1 1 L wFFa>j- YV ✓V` V VV � =p. c •� uLL 4` O r 1�- w•O.d V SuV c qVW� C d M 2 p O »•• -_ C N - \ v d L C Y Oq s V 3• ^ w_ V G r <O N piM Y� 9V YL P T� ^ GO O NE OC ✓r! ✓ r >S yw.V � \TC`•• Y�q 'D rgL P >L VO '.ti- Nerr ✓u 9.. C lc'my MO Q4. Y N•. Qpti TJ L_ C �Yif 90Le� VV u�Oy d �T OCC LC TY. v00 OYr_O _Vi O✓ PNO CC•. ` aC1Q � � V� �g0 ✓ �✓ 6t .r d' ✓Vd i� L P�•` 00- \` 6WG of � VC Wia� -� Y6 -LTL••OY l L�Cm{. i Y O t6� O O V V O y�r - w i 11 �1 NO C W Q 2 O Y 0. 3 L •Y N O \\ C �a E Q r. Z v �i d E 11 tl ✓ O> L T Y O O G V dM � DN�C O •LiI G L r N OD G +•On Y a `' + == 4 0� tl TNC •� V w_O � V V L Pa4iOn C C fV` C + e � +i_✓ 1— VO O J V � C Y •r C tl �O� v r ryry PPp ��WE L q L✓( L • Q CL.Lwa C-n > dP 0 ✓ C q VN � V O e G G C� O e L_ + W ✓ O ` � V �� f ONd+ f.p�eL ✓✓ ✓ D p w C O G O a r V� O �• 9_ _ G CO ,�eiC y 4 N i N — T A O O' P _ O. 4 G � �V +arL N —MC 9 V RN YN2:5 P � V Gy `f�j' 9 Y 4 V OV O C L O M L• D ✓ V n G w d y u O M v w i � 9 O V L e W �'C O O n C1 4 V P Q6 CM a V Cff0:5 + Y D _�). O'er O'w�YL p'Ne .n 4,Pa O —O �.� VOOO La U_ P PN CV✓_ r ` � +_` < P> O V 1C1 O O� L • O e C c V,r N w O O O y j6 V �V V a"•¢O n V O 3 o OOC_11p `� «C T �^ IL V C 6 — i ~ l G r i A N V O N� Y::G, tly Q 0_ •— .3 V Oi V G VW �. .� V V H O P V J V L ✓ OV yVj 9 C• 6 V O O •Jl p O L ✓_O OL L�1 Y.Or O L V n wAOC 3 y q G i ✓e L✓ C T J � G G VV Y � V V p Yy w✓ ✓ GD y` _C ✓ CO9 A e _ V y e 84 _ N rt L d w q e l• C^. G N y p V L "�• a Pd NfJL Dd7 ryA Ay j V y NBC N_L Y N —f N C ` p _ c G� ✓ i D u a z L✓ i c .0 eV Ow -o +i GeO 0= .✓i.4Y •, Z YwQ ✓_ r ✓L� ✓� `g" t E 4 O O 4 7» • P qbyI V pp� � 64 _ G 9 O t V1.Ce •O•MEt VL �C <Qi uS NSY <L N O �p j P `M' s L< O 9 y 6 U C C P q C L V P O C q O C p A > 6 a a 9.r i O 6 � V � 6 a L O N y o� � r V L aY P O O i V < PY 0 O O 6 O q T w V a C ' O n c 7 L p P _ O C tl E « Cy E O P 0 C v w Y t •S l 9 V �` V� ✓ O> L T p' • M O✓ P— 4 r• l O O C C C P O M 06 O C_ L V L q G L r L PN Vm'� L6 `' + == •Vim'= y6V<O TNC Pa4iOn V n fV` C ✓ —y _O'O�nO iV C G •j L q L✓( L = y V y O� C-n > 0 ✓ C � V O e G G C� O e L_ Oeb r�rV �� .t 4 ✓ ONd+ f.p�eL ✓✓ ✓ D L p C q r V� O U l wC _ G CO ,�eiC VD.6 +< 4P OnO+ '• j �V +arL N —MC RN YN2:5 V —Fr O �'C O O n C1 4 V P Q6 CM a V Cff0:5 D _�). O'er O'w�YL p'Ne .n 4,Pa Y.w —O �.� VOOO La U_ P PN CV✓_ r ` � +_` < P> O V 1C1 O O� L • O e C c V,r N w y j6 V �V nO VjO VYy pu ✓ P =C_ o OOC_11p =1 + ` V ..p C 6 — i ~ l G r i A N V O N� Y::G, tly Q 0_ •— .3 V Oi V G VW �. .� V V H O P V OV A a V O O •Jl p O O g LO i 0 Cl� 0 Z 0 L L g a P C C g C 6 P 0 io c V- 'i W 0 `o a o J , p ' Ca< m 'p! au CY w t r..L. L.• ° < Sr VC L � a � S�S V oo c C V N a o� J <o L NJr V � �N�Lr 9 7 V w S �f9 NJ 1 ¢O L V° Z P i¢ V O ipp Or T V ¢ O 4 N L y'• Y _ =p Q9 O C D c NS .-Zz � i _ L � � • V a V v �4P ap •. O_ Q pSr vL W _•L.• � +W •+ en p M C V r l L O aC a� Y O vu P { C O V N V 6r O � •w V p L p P G� V r L w 'J C V a V Cj O W N ¢O° N•°.� VV �V pc— Z VL N'a aL•' v t N f rC rV •C-•V yV —y �'arC �' ¢ C• � V Cry l� Lr,yVr ° r da LJ LMr YC a. ¢P3.°r_ YW J[ 1 V L V V r •w q L •• OG4 JC. �i _� Zr V _ W N O V LiO p•" V V _ �� v =r 0= L•r — arc oW r 4 N a � d d —_ > N �• O L Car — pa°, C 9 ° � b O 6V y— Wr LV 3° Vp V IL i O •°�Ca•J� p + r O P� e p � •w L O. � Q J g a P C C g C 6 P 0 io c V- 'i W 0 `o a o J , p ' Ca< m 'p! au CY w t < Sr VC N V S�S V C V L a <o rF V w S �f9 NJ 1 ¢O L M V _ Z P i¢ V o. ipp Or T V ¢ O 4 Or O C D c NS a V v �4P ap •. O_ Q pSr vL W _•L.• � +W •+ en p M C V r l L O aC a� Y O vu r O C O V N 6r O � •w V p L ' P G� V r L w 'J C V a V Cj O W N N 11 0 a o J , p ' m 'p! au CY w t Sr VC N V S�S V C V L a V w S — ¢O L M V _ Z P V ipp Or T V ¢ O 4 O C D jW a V v �4P ap •. O_ Q pSr vL W _•L.• � •+ en p M C V r l L O aC aiZ= Y O V r O C O V N 6r O � •w V p L ' P G� V p C L w 'J C V a V Cj O ¢O° N•°.� VV �V VL N'a aL•' <O.N t N f 11 , ' m — r N H .• L M V _ Z P V O C D ' v y •. O_ Q 9 W N O L V � V r O C O V N e C r L L ¢P3.°r_ ^ TL _ r V . M2 ° � � Y C L l • 01 V IL i O � + r O P� e p � •w L O. � Q J C O E a r. OCV V E 'O 6V LM r0 V � ±O N Vir a•n_ •Vw ° ` � C °a ` xy ° >'�C� O ► aC�V gyCL V C C ICY c V V Op .•. � O O a W a+ 4G > tam i> i IA -3b E V C ^V •Lp Oo ` °fi mss_ N B ° r �fY. VI •1 ° V 0 O Y � O L f.V+� 1✓ v u y` P w N r A M= � CCCV 6 O T° V � ✓ ° A ° Y V - u Y r � C _ Y Q V ° •C A � C tl C d Y � • P 6 u L V L� f 9 a � V t �~ m w0 I V O��V p •� `•G wV �V (per .G T e � E V C my Y 0 � �S f.V+� 1✓ v u y` P w 9 � CCCV 6 O T° V � ✓ ° A ° C r � _ U ° ✓ L� f 9 a � V t �~ m w0 T O��V p •� `•G O° �V (per .G T 4 L L •� euri= ° o ° ya[ v •�W � p V � p � N •n = sue= O Y v V C L e u r V L Z• O� YG r�L_ �•'• M O 1••� 6� 6 Ow n_ — 2 Y A O C I Lm _ _ mGi r > w G_✓ P Wm >° rii ✓ V L Y+ + C V Is y V A O Z T V V r Y V +� + •.• M- �I � m� C � C � r 9 fi i y ✓ J w{ N+ r A S A° + V• iL ✓ � zr- •�° u r✓ , __ __ _ V V E E V G V O✓ M) V T Y+ L m 1 = A p ✓ m O� Z� 3 o I-k _3� .: 0 11 DATE: TO: FRnM- BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT December 12, 1984 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Birk- GnmP7_ Citv Planner Pan Coleman, Associate Planner AREA SPECIFIC AM NUMrnl dl+ -Ve - CAYCIV MVCIYVL VYCRLMI vialR161 - nil amendment to the Industrial Area Specific Plan to create a Haven Avenue Overlay District located along Haven Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and 4th Street. The Overlay District will modify permitted land uses and provide specific design standards regarding site planning and architecture. I. BACKGROUND- At the November 14th meeting, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the draft of the Haven Avenue Overlay District. Staff has incorporated the changes made by the Commission into the proposed Ordinance. Therefore, adoption of the attached Resolutions recommending approval of the Haven Avenue Overlay District to the City Council would be appropriate. In addition, there are several related land use amendments discussed in the following report. II. ANALYSIS: The purpose of the overlay District is to establish development standards which address the unique setting and character of the haven Avenue corridor. Haven Avenue is the major travel route for the City and has the potential for high end office development with a -anique combination of direct access to the airport and the Inters ate 10 freeway. This provides the City a rare opportunity to enhance its image by encouraging intensive, high quality office and professional development along the Haven Avenue corridor. The Overlay District is to be applied in conjunction with the Specific Plan for Subareas 6 and 7 and provides more specific and/or restrictive development policies, design standards and land use regulations for both Subareas 6 and 7. Topics not specifically covered by the Haven Avenue Overlay District will continue to be governed by the regulations of the Specific Plan. Development adjacent to the Haven Avenue Overlay District will consider compatibility and integration with the Overlay District through the Master Plan process. III. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The Initial Study, including the ITEM I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ISP Amendment 84 -02 December 12, 1984 Page #2 Environmental Checklist, has been completed and staff found no significant impacts which result from the adoption of the Overlay District. The land use and development standards and regulations proposed are designed to implement the intent of existing Genera'. Plan and Industrial Specific Plan statement and policies. '.n addition, further environmental re-view will occur when individual development projects are proposed since site spcc ;fic environmental analysis Cannnt be cersido.-sa -+ �L_ ....c of the Overlay District. If the Commission concurs with these findings, a r-.-commendation to the City Council for the issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: To approve the Haven Avenue Overlay District the ommission should make the follow-'Ing findings: A. That the Paven Avenue Overlay District is consistent with the General Plan land use policies and Industrial Area Specific Plan; and, B. That the Haven Avenue Overlay District promotes the goals of the Land Use Element and the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and, C. That implementation of the Haven Avenue Overlay District standards and regulations would not be materially injurious or detrimental to adjacent properties. V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Daily Report newspaper and notices were sent to all subject property owners within 300 feet of the Overlay District boundaries. To date, no written correspondence has been received either for or against the proposed Overlay District. VI. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commission adopt the attached Resolution recommending approval of Industrial Ar -a Specific Plan Amendment 84 -02 establishing an Haven Aven- Overlay District and issuance of a Negative Declaration. Respl2etfullye- )pitted, r! /VAC i'` Kick -om l C ity fanner RG:OC:cv 1I Attachments: Resolution Recoa needing Approval Ordinance Initial Study Part II z.- a r. "p �l� ft�l t . MASTER PLAN } r V- -: a 11A ov } r AaPiIC.L`rT•_ ���5 FILING DATE: PROJECT: /if1J 4� PROJECT LOCATION: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ?APT II — INITIAL STUDY ENVIP.0N.x=-AL CHECIKLIST LOG NIMER: / f¢1K eGl��csy e, '7'0Z I. ENXIRON� ENTAL I%TACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets). YES `LAYBE NO 1. Soils and Geology. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? b. bla ruptio:s, displacements, compaction or burial of the soil? C. Change in topography or ground sur- °ace contour intervals? / ?. The destruction, covering or modif_ cation of any unique geologic or physica= features? e. Any potential increase in wind or water erosion of soils, affecting either or. or off site conditors? f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? g. Exposure of people or propert, to geologic hazards such as eazttquakes_ landslides, mud— / slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? h. An increase in the rate ri extraction and /or use of any mineral resource? 2. Hydrology. Will the proposal have significant results in: i-S Page 2 i YES MAYBE NO a- Changes in currents, or the course of direction of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream channels? — L b- Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? 0 c. Alterations to Cie course or flow of flood � varorg? — 4- d. Change in the amount of surface water in any body of water? — 4L e. Discharge into surface waters, or any alteration of surface water quality? _- f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? - y` g. Change in the quantity of groundwaters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interference with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? h. The reduction in the amount of water other - wisL available for public water supplies? i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or seiches? -- / 3. Air Quality. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile or indirect sources? / Stationary sources? —' b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or interference with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? c. Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture / or temperate °re? 4. Blot.: Flora. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including dioersity, distribution, or number of any specier of plants? / a. Reduction of thk- numbers of any unique, rare or endangered spe:ies of plants? _ _ , _ Page 3 YES MAYBE NO c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of / plants into an area? 1 d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural production? Fauna. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, / including diversity, distribution, or numbers of any species of animals? b. Reduction of the n =bees oz any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? L c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of animals into an area., or result in a barrier / to the migration or movement of animals? r/- d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or / wildlife habitat? T 5. Population. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of / the human population of an area? b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or / create.a demand for additional housing? —! 6. Socio- Economic Factors. Will the propo3al have significant results in: a. Change in local or regional socio- economic characteristics, including economic or / com:aercial diversity, tax rate, and property values? — b. Will project costs be equitably distributed / among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, 1 tax payers cr project users? 7. Land Use and Planning Considerations. Will the proposal have significant results in? a. A substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? T b. A conflict with any desiguations, objectives, policies, or adopted plans of any governmental entities? c. An im.act upon the qulaity or quantity of existing consumptive or non - consumptive recreational opportunities? S„ - -I 8. Transportation. Will the proposal have significant_ results in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for new street construction? C. Effects on demand for new parking. d. Substantial impact upon existing transporta- tion systems? e. Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of people and /or goods? f. Alterations to or effects on present and potential water -borne, rail, mass transit or air traffic ? - g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 9. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. A disturbance to the integrity of paleontological, and /or historical resources? 10. Health. Safetv, and Nuisance Factors. Will the proposal have significant results in: Page 4 YES MAYBE NO _ L Z 7 J -7 a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health — hazard? 1 b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? j c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances in the event of an accident? d. An increase in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? e. Increase in existing noise ievels? c. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous noise levels? g. The creation of objectionable odors? b. An increase in light or glare? L J r Page 5 l YES MAYBE NO 11. Aesthetics., Will the proposal have significant results in: a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic vista or view? / b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive / site? c. A conflict with the objective of designated or potential scenic corridors? / 12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal have a significant need for new systems, or alterations to the following: a. Electric power? b_ Natural or packaged gas? c. Com=unications systems? d. Water supply? e. Wastewater facilities? f. Flood control structures? Y g. Solid caste facilities? h_ Fire protection? 1. Police protection? j. Schools? _ t k. Parks or other recreational facilities? 1. Maintenance of public facilities, including reads and flood control facilities? m. Other governmental services? _ 13. Energy and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? �= Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy? _ c. An increase in the demand for development of new sources of energy? d. Pn increase or perpetuation of the consumption of non - renewable forms of energy, when feasible / renewable sources of energy are available? I -`-1 _ e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or scarce natural resource? 14. Mandatory Findinrs of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self suCtainine in,.n7e .t_____- eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short —term, to the disadvantage of long —term, environmental goals? (A short —term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long- term impacts will endure well into the future). c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in cornecticn with the effects of past projects, and probable future projects). d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Page 6 YES MAYBE. No irl 1 1 ZI. DISCUSSIO`r' OF MrIRON%ENTAL EVALUATION (i.e., of affirmative answers to the above questions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures). i -\O E 13 11 r L'J 11 l� III. DETEMMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect :J in this case because the mitigation measures desc -'bed on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significanz effect on the envirnment, and an ENVIRONhMT IMPACT SPORT is reau443ed, Date tore Z. Z - \i / Title J Page 7 ORDIIANCE NO. Pll- 21 -2 -0 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING PART III OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO ESTABLISH A HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT LOCATED ON BOTH SIDES OF HAVEN AVENUE BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND 4TH STREET. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The following section is hereby added to Part III, Developmends and Guidelines: V. HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT Purpose The purpose of the Overlay District is to establish development standards which address the unique setting and character of the Haven Avenue corridor. The Haven Avenue Overlay District is located an both the zast and west sides of Haven Avenue extendina from Foothill Soulevarri south to 4th Street, as shown in Figure V -1. Applicability The Overlay District is to be applied in conjunction with the Specific Plan for Subareas 5 and 7 and provides more specific and /or restrictive development policies, design standards and land use regulations for both Subareas 5 and 7. Topics not specifically covered by the Haven Avenue Overlay District will continue to be governed by the regulations of the Specific Plan. Development adjacent to the Haven Avenue Overlay District shall consider compatibility and integration with the Overlay District tlsrough the Master Plan process. Setting Haven Avenue is located near the geographic center of the City and will be the most significant gateway into Rancho Cucamonga. Another important aspect is the distinctiveness of the Haven Avenue corridor in relation to other m?ior arterials designated as 'Special Boulevards". Haven Avenue is the major travel route for the City and has the potential for high end office development with a unique combination of direct access to the airport and the Interstate 10 freeway. This provides the City a rare opportunity to enhance its image by encouraging intensive, high quality office and professional development along the Haven Avenue corridor. �. -�a Resolution No. Page 2 Relation to General Plan The General Plan affirms that travel routes are predominate elements of the community's image and encourages the distinctiveness of individual districts and roadway corridors. In addition, the General Plan states that a consistent design theme is necessary to reinforce the image cr perception of a route. The Specific Plan states that the Haven Avenue corridor and the Industrial Park category should be designed to project a "campus like image for firms seeking an attractive and Pleasant working environment -with high prestige value ". A. Goal Statement Goals are statements that define the community's aspiration and intentions. The goal for the Haven Avenue corridor has evolved from sessions with the : ndustrial and business communities and with the City's elected and appointed officials. This goal represents the current conception of and future aspirations for the best interest of the City for the oven Avenue corridor. o Encourage long —range master planned development along the Haven Avenue corridor which enhances Rancho Cucamonga's image by providing an intensive, high quality gateway into the City and by promoting a distinctive, attractive, and pleasant office park atmosphere in a campus like setting with nigh prestige identity. B. Land Use Types The intent of the following policies is to encourage land uses and development consistent with the design goal for the Haven Avenue corridor as an intensive, high quality gail-way into the community. B.I. Haven primary land function A en a isintended to be of pan administrative /professional and office nature. B.2. Select ancillary commercial and business support service uses shall not exceed 20% of the floor area in any Master �J I -e3 Resolution No. Page 3 L Permitted Uses Conditional Uses �J KI Planned development_. Concentration of such uses in any building or along. the street frontage is not permitted. 3.3. The following land use types are permitted or conditionally permitted within the Haven Avenue Overlay District. All other uses shall be prohibited. Administrative and Office Financial, insurance & Real Estate Services Communication Services Medical /Health Care Services Professional Services Administrative Civic Services Cultural Business Supply Retail Sal s & Services'` Business Support Services le Eating and Drinking Establishments Convenience Sales & Services * Entertainment Food and Beverage Sales* Hotel /Motel Personal Services Recreation Facilities Public Assembly Public Safety & Utility Religious Assembly *Ancillary Uses Limited floor area per B.2. C. Master Planned Development Services to 20% of the The intent of this section is to provide for integrated development at the earliest possible time in the review process. Through the Master Plan process there is opportunity to coordinate the efforts of sirgle or multiple property owners and discourage piecemeal development. The City Planner may require master planning of property outside the Overlay District, adjacent to a project proposal, where necessary to assure integrated development and promote the goal of the Haven Avenue Overlay District. The following standards shall apply to all projects and should not be constrained by parcel lines or 1 -\mot Resolution Flo. Page 4 specific site boundaries: C.I. A conceptual Master Plan shall be submitted for Planning Commission approval together with any development proposal, including subdivision or parcel map applications, to address harmonious site plan relationships and potential for shared access and open spaces, and reciprocal parking. Master Plans shall indicate conceptual building pad locations, points of ingress and egress, parking lot configurations, conceptual grading and drainage, landscape and plaza areas, pedestrian circulation, .nd signs. in addition, a statement of architectural intent at.d /or conceptual elevations shall adequately specify how the architectural concepts, including style, form, bulk, height, orientation, and materials will meet the intent of the architectural standards and design goal for Haven Avenue. C.2. The Master Plan, boundaries indicated in Figure V -2 are logical planning boundaries based upon physical contraints and property ownership. These boundaries may be modified when it is determined that the Master Plan is consistent with the intent and purpose of the Haven Avenue Overlay District. C.3. 4o Parcel Map or Subdivision Map shall be accepted or approved without concurrent submittal and approval of a Master Plan to assure integrated development consistent with the goal of the Haven Avenue Overlay District. C.4. Architecture within Master Planned development shall have a compatible design style with variation in the building style, form, and materials in accordance with the architectural standards of the Overlay District. Lot Size C.5. Minimum parcel size shall to two (2) acres with a minimum parcel depth of 225 feet within a Master Plan development. IM I- k's Resolution Nu. Page 5 U Access 11 U A 300 -foot minimum lot width shall also be required, consistent with the access control policies. The Planning Commission may waive these requirements when it is determined that the parcel is part of a Master Plan which is consistent with the intent and purpose of the Overlay District. All lots of record are allowed to develop according to the requirements of the Haven Avenue Overlay District. C.6. Vehicular access or`o Haven Avenue shall be discouraged herever suitable alternative access -.,y be developed from other streets as determined through the Master Plan process. If vehicular access onto Haven Avenue is granted, said access shall be shared �4ith adjacent parcels. The minimum distance between drive approaches shall be 30G feet with 200 feet the minimum distance between a drive approach and the curb return of any intersection along Haver, Avenue. Also, reciprccal parking and access easements shall be required, where appropriate, with any development proposal. C.7. Public transit facilities shall be considered within all Master Plans. Convenient pedestrian access shall be provided to designated transit facilitiiF, such as bus stops. C.8. Gn -s?'e circulation for both pedestrians and vehicles shall consider existing or planned circulation patterns on adjacent properties. Connections shall be made where appropriate to foster more integrated development and enhance pedestrian movement. D. Site Orientation The following standards are intruded to promote integrated, pedestrian oriented, office park development in a campus 'like setting: Z -1b Resolution No. Paq= 5 Pedestrian Orientation V.1. Site planning, including building configuration and placement, must creme opportunities for courtyards and plazas and other lanascaped open spaces and promote safe and convenient pedestrian movement with continuous landscaped pathways between buildings. D.2. Parking areas and circulatIL;n aisles along the Haven Avenue street frontage are discouraged and may only be approved through the Master Plan process when it is deter.-nined apprcpriate and necessary to implement the design goal of the Haven Avenue Ovar.lay District. Their visual impact shall be fully mitigated through dispersed parking areas and extensive landscaping and berming. D.3. Vehicular circulation around the rear and side portions of a site is encouraged. Circulation aisles which fragment or disrupt the connection of pedestrian spaces throughout a project shall be avoide.. to the extent possible. Parking 0.4. The use of dispersed parking areas which provide convenient access to buildings without interrupting interior pedestrian spaces is encouraged to reduce the need for large parking lots. Where large parkin: '-'s are necessary, they shall be loco___ in areas less visible from Haven Avenue and their visual impact fully mitigated with building placement and exten,..ve landscaping and berming. 0.5. On- street parkirg along Haven Avenue shall be prohibited. 0.5. Building placement at or rear the streetscape building setback is strongly encouraged within all developments, particularly on corner lots with high visibility. Multiple building placement should provide variable streetscape setbacks to reduce streetscape monotony. E+] E v Resolution No. Page 7 Setbacks Minimum Landscape Coverage D.7. A 45 -foot Zveraue landscape setback and a minimum 4; -fo6t building setback shall be required along Haven Avenue, as measured from the ultimate face of curb, including existing lots of record and condominium lots or lots within a center when designed as an integral part of a Master Planned development. D.8. Ancillary service and loading areas ,;hall he designed and located where least viaible frog public view and adjacent properties designated "Industrial Park ". D.9. All existing and including electrical 34.5 KV, within `he installed undergroi -ld. E. Landscaping n quirements new utilities, service less than pro,;ect shall be The intent of the folioin ng standards is to enhance the visual quality of the streetscape and provide an attractive and pleasant working environment in a campus like setting. E.1. A minimum twenty-five (25) percent of net lcc area � °xcludes right -of -way dedications and pr-;,!ate streets) shall be landscaped areas and pedestrian hardscape plazas and cour::,;ards. E.2. The landscape /hardscape coverage requirement may be modified for individual parcels within master planned developments when it is determined that the master plan as a whole meets the required coverage and the project is cnn=istent with the intent and purposes of the design goal for Haven Avenue. E.3. A maximum five (5) percent credit toward the required landscape /hardscape coverage may be permitted where appropriate public art is to be displayed in a setting which enhances pedestrian spaces and building architecture. T - \mss Resoluti.n No. Page 8 Berming Water Coservation E.4. A consistent streetscape design theme shall be developeL along the Haven Avenue streetscape which incorpoi -'-d intensified landscaping with specimen size trees, alluvial rockscape, :Hounding, meandering sidewalks, and appropriate street furniture. Landscaping materials shall be selected which provide an historic link to the City's past, such as eucalyptus windrows, citrus trees, and grape vines. In addition, a program of street name monument signs shall be developed to include low profile, natural alluvial rock monument signs with individual letters farmed in a sandblasted concrete face. E.5 Landscaping and berming shall be designed to create visual interest and variety to the streetscape, enhzmce building architecture, screen utilities and buffer views of automobiles, Pavement and service areas. and to define and to distinguish the pedestrian environment from vehicular spaces. E.5. A combinat °.on of water conserving landscape and irrigation techniques are required such as the use of drought tolerant plant spec .s and handscape (non - irrigated) surfaces, anJ special irrigation systems such as drip emitters, low volume stream rotors, deep watering of trees and shrubs, tensiometers `.o measure soil moisture, and automat4c timers. E.7. Landscape materials shall be selected for their low maintenance, drought tolerance, and "at and wind tolerance. F. Open Space and Pedestrian Environment The intent of this section is to promote the functional design and location of pedestrian spaces, and provide convenient pedestrian circulation on and off site and promote a campus like setting. I -19 E U Resolution No. Page 9 Pedestrian Facilities F.1. The development of a pedestrian node or focal point, such as a plaza or courtyard is required within all projects. F.2. The location of plazas and courtyards should encourage maximum pedestrian use and be separated and /or buffered from vehicular parking and circulation. Such locations may be near a prominent building entrance or along a centralized pedestrian path. F.3. Pedestrian plazas or courtyards shall be designed to create an attractive, comfortable, and functional setting with a "sense of place ". A combination of the following design elements are encouraged, but are not limited to: pavement or surface texture; elevation /grade changes; use of landscape materials and structures to provide shade and define enclosed spaces; seating (eg - benches, steps, or raised planters); and outdoor eating areas. In addition, the use of water features, covered -walkways, and public art are encouraged. F.4. Trash receptacles, drinking fountains, light standards and other street furniture shall be designed to enhance the appearance and function of open space areas. F.5. Convenient pedestrian circulation shall be provided throughout all projects to connect parking areas and public transit facilities with buildings and pedestrian open spaces. G. Architecture The following standards are intended to promote a high quality office park image with high prestige identity: Urban Style G.I. Desirable architecture along Haven Avenue shall project a high quality progressive, sophisticated, and urban style of development. While the use of a variety of exterior materials may be I - ao Res -)lution No. Page 10 Permitted to achieve this image; Spanish, Mediterranean, or traditional architecture styles are not generally considered appropriate for office buildings. G.2. Variations in architectural styles, construction methods, and materials for certain ancillary uses, such as restaurants aid banks, may be permitted where the architecture is exemplary and consistent with the high quality image required for Haven Avenue and where a particular design is necessary and more appropriate considering the intended use of the building. Multiple Story G.3. Multiple story buildings of sufficient mass are encouraged that reflect the scale and proportion of the Haven Avenue right -of -way and streetscape setbacks. Low, linear buildings are discouraged. G.4. Building design elements that are considered inappropriate for an office park atmosphere include retail type storefront elevations I, linear configurations, continuous glazing, multiple doorways), and numerous overhead roil -up doors which promote concentrations of ancillary commercial and business support services, and are therefore prohibited. G.5. Service and loading areas shall be screened from public view and adjoining properties, wherever possible, to reduce site design constraints on future adjacent development. Architectural Variety G.5. Architectural planes shall have variation in depth and angle to create variety and interest in the basic form and silhouette of the building. G.7. Articulation of the elevation surfaces is encouraged through the use of openings and recesses which create texture and shadow patterns and provide variety in the building plane or surface. I - a.� Resolution No. Page 11 E Signs LI G.8. Building entrances shall be well articulated and project a formal entrance statement through variation of architectural planes, pavement surface treatment, and landscaped plazas. G.9. Accent treatment such a.s changes in exterior materials and texture is encouraged in conjunction with variation in the major form giving ements of a structure. G.10. A coordinated Uniform Sign Program shall be required for any development, including wall and monument signs. Building wall signs shall consist of individual letters and can signs are prohibited. The size, number, typical design and location of the signs, as permitted by the City's Sign Ordinance, shall be submitted with the development application and be reviewed concurrently. H. Urban Centers The following standards are intended to promote the highest quality development and intensity to create community focal points or "urban centers" near the key intersections of 4th Street and Foothill Boulevard, as shown in Figure V -1. N.I. The applicability of these urban center standards for specific parcels shall be determinwd through the Master Plan review process. r H.2. Multiple story office and professional buildings of the highest design quality are required, particularly at the immediate corners of 4th Street and Foothill Boulevard. Desirable structural components include steel, and concrete in conjunction with curtain walls, spanirels and glass. Wood frame structures are discvdraged. Z -aa Resolution No. Page 12 4.3. A minimum thirty (30) percent of net lot area (excludes right -of -way dedications and private streets) shall be landscaped areas and pedestrian hardscape plazas or courtyards. H.4. Special landscaping and streetscape design features shall be developed for the intersections at 4th and Foothill to create an intensive and prestigious gateway entry into Rancho Cucamonga and the Haven Avenue Avenue Corridor. H.5. The use of parking structures is encouraged to promote intensified development and maximize the site area devoted to urban pedestrian Diazas and courtyards. Parking structures shall be harmoniously designed with the main building and located around the rear or side portions of the site. H.6. The minimum parcel size shall be five (5) acres unless waived by the Planning Commission when it is determined that the parcel is designed as an integral part of a master planned development consistent with the intent and purpose of the Overlay District. SECTION 2: The City Council finds that Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 8 - is an implementation of the General Plan Z!-A Industrial Specific Flan goals and policies and that the General Plan and Industrial Specific Plan Environmental Impact Reports adequately cover any potential significant adverse impacts. Further, the City Council tinds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental impact report is required pursuant to Division 13, Chapter 6, Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code. Specifically, the City Council. A. No substantial changes are proposed in any goals or policies which would require major revision- to the EIR's. B. No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken. C. No new infot- ^ation on the project has become available. SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Re ort, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of ntario, California, and circulated in the Citt, of Rancho Cucamonga, California. z - a3 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 84 -02 - AMENDING PART III OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO ESTABLISH A HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT LOCATED ON BOTH SIDES OF HAVEN AVENUE BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND 4TH STREET. Whereas, the Planning Commission held duly advertised public hearings pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code; and Whereas, accordance with Section 17 20.020nof the eDevelopment Code as been proposed in SECTION 1. The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following fin— d —inos- 1. That the area for which the Haven Avenue overlay ® district designation is proposed has a unique �i character, identity or environment. 2. That the unique character, identity or environment of the Haven Avenue corridor area will be preserved and enhanced to the benefit of such area and the City as a whole by the provisions set forth by the overlay district. 3. That an overlay district is necessary to protect, preserve or enhance the anique. character or identity of `he Haven Avenue corridor area. 4. That an overlay district is necessary to protect the health, welfare and safety of the public. 5• The Haven Avenue overlay district is consistent with the intent of the General Plan and Industrial Specific Plan Land Use Policies. SECTION l Area e Co Planning nisi9 atproposed Indust ria Specifi A imment8- mm PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION Amendment 84.02 Page 2 L] the General Plan and industrial Specific Pian goals and policies and that the General Plan and industrial Specific Plan Environmental Impact Reports adequately cover any potential significant adverse impacts. Further, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental impact report is required pursuant to Division 13, Chapter 6, Section 2 1166 of the Public Resources Code. Specifically, the "larning Commission finds: A. No substantial changes are proposed in anj goals or policies which would require major revi --ions to the EIR's. B. No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumsta--es under which the project is being undertaken. C. No new information on the project has beccme available. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 6850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt the attached Ordinance amending Part III of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. Lb 2. That s Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary -L -Qb PLANNING COMMISSICN RESOLUTION Amendment 84 -02 Page 3 0 I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho+ Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of P,ancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of December, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COiMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COQ-41SSIONERS: _r1 I -a; 0 C1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission ,. r.wln. Rick UUIOL C, Ll'LY PlL i71Cf' BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: DMENT 84 -04A - HAYtN HYLNUt UVtKLHT JiJiKll.i - H uenerai roan Rmenament from Office to Industrial Park for approximately 40 acres of land located on the west side of Haven Avenue, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Highway, in conjunction with the Haver, Avenue Overlay District - APN 208 - 331 -01, 12, 13, and 208 - 341 -01. AL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Development District Amendment from OP (Off ice /Professionai) to ISP (Industrial Specific Plan) and MH (14 -24 du /ac) for approximately 40 acres of land located on the west side of Haven Avenue, between. Foothill Boulevard and Arrow highway, in conjunction with the Haven Avenue Overlay District - APN 208 - 331 -01, 12, 13, and 208- 341-01. ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN amendment to the industrial Specific Plan to expand the boundaries of Subarea 7 (Industrial Palk category) to include approximately 40 acres of land located on the west side of Haven Avenue, between Foothill BoulevarO - d Arrow Highway, in conjunction with the Haven Avenue iverlay District - APN 208- 331 -01, 12, 13 and 208 - 341 -01. I. BACKGROUND: These three items are presented in conjunction with the adoption of the Naven Avenue Overlay District. The intent is to simplify the implementation of the Overlay District by including all of the study area within the Industrial Specific Plan. This will eliminate duplication of the Overlay District in the Development Code and provide consistency relative to base district standards and zoning. At the November 14th meeting, the Planning Commission received public input and discussed the three land use amendments and indicated their concurrence with the proposed amendments. Therefore, adoption of the attached Resolutions recommending approval to the City Council would be appropriate. ITEMS J, K, L PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Haven Avenue Overlay District December 12. 1984 Page 2 II. SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Location: West side of Haven Avenue, Boulevard and Arrow Highway. o. Parcei Size: Approximately 40 acres. between Foothill C. Existing Zoning: OP (Office /Professional) D. Existing Land 'Jse: Grapevines exist on the majority of site with a house and barn located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard near the Deer Creek Channel. E. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Virginia Dare Winery, GTE Building, zoned General Commercial. South - Old La Mancha Golf Course, zoned ISP (Industrial Park, Subarea 7). East - Office Building and County Law and Justice Center under construction, zoned ISP (Industrial Park, Subarea 7); K -Mart, zoned ISP (Commercial, Subarea West - G?anevires, Deer Creek Channel, 7n--,i Mu (MAAi+_rp -uinh Residential, FC (Flood Control), OP (Office /Professional). F. General Plan Designations: PrnZZ!ct �ite - Office North - Cazanercial South - Industrial Park East - Ivoustrial Park, Commercial West - Medium -High Residential (14 -24 du /ac), Flood Control, Office. III. ANALYSIS: The subject property represents a critical portion of the Haven Avenue corridor. Development of the site under the Overlay Districc standards will help create an "urban center" and provide a siTiificant gateway into the corridor. As mentioned previously, the proposed amendments will provide a consistent base district for all of the study area and simplify implementation of the Overlay District standards. 3 -a 11 0 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Haven Avenue Overlay District December 12, 1984 Page 3 The subject property is shown on Exhibit "A ". Near the northwest corner of Arrow highway and Haven Avenue the current District boundary between OP and MH follows an existing property line 0659' west of Haven Avenue. The propcsed boundary between the ISP and MH Districts, however, is 310' closer to Haven for consistency with Tentative Parcel Map 8345, recently approved by the Planning Commission (see Exhibit "B "). The revised boundary is necessary to avoid splitting a future parcel between land use districts, and will add approximately 9.5 acres to the Medium High Residential District (14 -24 du /ac). To mitigate potentia' :uncerns for proper land use transition and buffering, a condition of the Parcel Map requires 3 master plan to be processed concurrently with any developm --+ application submitted on the property. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT- The Initial Study, including the Environmental checklist, has been completed and stafF found no substantial evidence to indicate significant environmental impacts will result from approval of the proposed amendments. The following is a summary of the major environmental factors considered by Staff during preparation of the Initial Study. If the Commission concurs with Staff's findings, a recommendation to ® t;ie City Council for approval of a Negative Declaration would be ® appropriate. Traffic. The land use change from Office to Residential on the 9.5 acre portion of the site should reduce traffic volume counts by an estimated 1,220 daily trips This estimate is based upon, buildout of the 9.5 acres at the mid -point of the density range (i.e., 19 du /ac). 1C v ainage. ]later runoff should be approximately six (6) percent less if the property is built out under the proposed land use designations. The reduction is attributable to the lesser amount of impervious surfaces if the land use on the 9.5 acre portion of the site Is ultirate'y multiple family residential versus office or industrial. Schools. Development of the 9.5 acre residential portion of the site would generate approximately 54 additional students (based on huildout at 19 du /ac). General Plan Consistency. The proposed Development District Amendment will not create a technical inconsistency with the General Plan, since the Land Use Map is general in nature and exact zone boundaries are determined by the Development District Map. J -3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Haven Avenue Overlay District December 12, 1984 Page 4 V. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: To approve the Amendments, the Commission should make the fo owing findings: A. That the amendments are consistent with the intent of the General Plan Land Use Policies; and B. That the ar:endments promote the goals of the Land Use Element; and C. That the amendments would not be materially injurious or detrimental to adjacent properties. VI. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in TheDaiiv Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. To date, no written corrspondence has been received either for or against the proposed amendments. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commission adopt the attic— hed Re<6l—utions recommending approval to the City Council of he proposed Amendments and the issuance of a Negative Declaration. Res c 'Iy sfiGmitted, Ric =Gomez City PURder !RG:DC:ns 7 1 attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Haven Avenue Overlay District Map Initial Study, Part II Resolutions 4`Y +.. E DECLOPMENT DISTRICT CAP ssss - I.S.P. g ..�....... FC M m GC 5mvp nn nnn -- -- - - - --- � UIOP ::;�:v /; I 1 ismmss�sssssa ®ssssm�sss :.. r � •;;;_■ Future City Hell s GC - I.S.P.µ m .' 4 �s . n . FIG. IV-7 CrfY OF RA11CHO CUCANIONGA PLANNING DlXgS aN FORTH ITE. \I= S8LN/tTI A'VE- AMENUMC -M75 TITTLE: 1;;$-=V VIST MAP :t i .5 . IP EXHIBIT': •_ SCALE -® 1�_C:z ` Aw DED TmrjCTNE PARCEL ➢LAP NO. 8345* IN THE Cm GI wCM Cu"Wou" IN' LM M. L.- LLCM1O. �l iiO L f0YT1. IIwLL t.tfi.'.. 1D W OI WIJYOMG. L!!L. tl K. IYt .[CpRCp�� .00t ♦OI YYL. NOL ...LCpIM W. 11. OfYUpW lM >tj -CLIYW� ��-- _ ✓Y �+°-j Vii ll.1= wr,tte p E PROPOSED ISP BOUNDARY M �� GC � rC- ..-- .� —�L_ � °�- �nnnnnnr+nnnnnnnnnnn -rte - - - li LL; OF ■� Irt>QlisrT■ ■■ ■■■ ■ ■ ■ ■■a ■■■ ■■■■ Future City Hall FC V f n O1ll GC i ■v ®■a -- - -' ■ I.S.P. s M 11A :a NORTH CITE' Cre RANCHO CUCATMO \'GA PLANNING DIVISION i o ✓Y �+°-j Vii ll.1= wr,tte p E PROPOSED ISP BOUNDARY M �� GC � rC- ..-- .� —�L_ � °�- �nnnnnnr+nnnnnnnnnnn -rte - - - li LL; OF ■� Irt>QlisrT■ ■■ ■■■ ■ ■ ■ ■■a ■■■ ■■■■ Future City Hall FC V f n O1ll GC i ■v ®■a -- - -' ■ I.S.P. s M 11A :a NORTH CITE' Cre RANCHO CUCATMO \'GA PLANNING DIVISION n LJ l DATE: APPL ICA% -r ;r,. u FILING DATE• / PR03ECT:- PROJECT LOCATION I. EN�TIRON*ENTAL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PART II - INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMEW?,AL CHECr=ST (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe' answers are required on attached sheets). YES MAYBE NO ® 1. Soils and Geology. Will the proposal have significant results it,.: a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships ?' b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or j burial of the soil? i c. Change in topography or ground surface contour intervals? — d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any potential increase in wind or water erosion of soils, affecting either on or off site conditons? _ f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? — r— g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? _ h. Ai increase in the rate of extraction and/or use of any mineral resource? — 2. Hydrology. will the proposal have significant results in: J _ , a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream channels? Page 2 YES MAYBE NO b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water rinof2? j c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood -f- ' waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any body of water? / e. Discharge into surface waters, or any alteration of surface water quality? f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? / S. Change in the quantity of grourdwaters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interference with an aquifer? Quality' Quantity? j 11. The reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for public water supplies? i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or seiches? 3. Air Quality. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile or indirect sources? Stationary sources? b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or interference with the attainment of applicable /. air quality standards? L C. Alteration cf local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? 4. Biota Flora. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or number of any species of plants? / b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare 7" or endangered species of plants? El . u Page 3 YES MAYBE NO c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of is — plants into an area? _ L d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural , production? 1 Fauna. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax or project users? including diversity, distribution, or numbers 7. Land Use and Planning Considerations. Will the of any species of animals? _ b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare planned land use of an area.) Gr endangera;i species of animals? l c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of c. _16n impact upon the qvlaity or quantity of animals into an area, or result in a barrier existing consumptive or non - consumptive to the migra,:ion or movement of animals? f/ d. Deterioration or r -moval of existing fish or wildlife habitat? S. Population. Will the proposal have significant rest -Its in: i ® a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of the human population of an area? �I / b. Will the proposal affect Existing housing, .r ereate.a demand for additional L housing? 6. Socio- Economic Factors. Uill the proposal have significant result= in. a. Change in Iccal or regional Socio- econcm.` characteristics, including economic or commercial diversity, tax rate, and property i va1-jes? b. Will project costs be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax or project users? payers 7. Land Use and Planning Considerations. Will the proposal have significant results in? a. A substautial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area.) b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, policies, or adopted plans of any governmental entities? c. _16n impact upon the qvlaity or quantity of existing consumptive or non - consumptive recreational opportunities? l Page 4 YES MAYBE NO A. Trar_sportation. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Eft,ects or. existing streets, or demand for new street construction? c. Effects on exintino nmrt-4.o demand for new parking? d. Substantial impact upon existing transporta- tion systems? e. Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of people and /or goods? f. Alterations to or effects on present and potential water - borne, rail, mass transit or air traffic7- g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 4. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. P. disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, paleontological, and /or historical resources? _ 10. health, Safety. and Nuisance Factors. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? C. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances in the event of an accident? d. An increase in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? e. Increase in existing noise levels? f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous nose levels? g. The creation of objectionable odors? h. An increase in light or glare? J - \o L t L i 1, r; _ 1 C Page 5 Amok 11. Aesthetics. Will the - proposal have significant results in: a. The obstructior or degradation of any scenic vista or view? b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site? c. A conflict with thy• objective of designated or potential scenic corridors? 12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal have a significant need for new systems, or alterations to the following: a. Electric power? b. Natural or packaged gas? c. Communications systems? d. Water supply? e. Wastewater facilities? f. Flood control structures? g. Solid waste facilities? h. Fire protection? i. Police protection? J. Schools? k. Parks or other recreational facilities? 1. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads and flood control facilities? m. Other governmental services? 13. Energy and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in: YES MAYBE NO — L L a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? b. Substantiai increase in demand upon existing / sources of energy? _! c. An increase in the demand for development of new sources of energy? d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumption of non- renewable forms of energy, when feasible / renewable sources of energy are available? _ .r; J -e� I. e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or scarce natural resource? 14: Mandatory Findings of S£Rnificance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustairi„> >e,_.e_i_ _�______ �- �• �u�GOVGL LV eliminate a plant Or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential tj achieve short -term, to the disadvantage of long -term, environmental goals? !A short -term impact or. the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long- term impacts will endure well into the future). Page 6 YES MAYBE No t C. Does the project have ':dpacts which are individually 1£m4tea, but cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable means that the incrementzl effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, and probable future projects). d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? IZ. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. (i.e., of affirmative answers to the above questions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures). a. 11 E Page 7 1 ' III. D^ ER*ffNATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find the proposed project COULD NM have a significant effect on the e-::: ,nWeat, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant 4 I effect on the envirome there will not be a significant effect 1 —: :.n this case because the mitigation sersures described on an attached sheet have been added to t:? project. A NEGATIVE nEC A-Z A.TI %S WTTT M VZZVAnr I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the envi=ntmnt, and an ENVIR0 = DTACT R i EPORT s- re uired. r - Date 11 1y -13 Title +RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENp1NG APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 84 -04A - HAVZu rAVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT - AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM OFFICE PROFESSIONAL TO INDUSTRIAL PARK FO:: APROXIMATELY 40 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE, BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ARROW HIGHWAY - APN'S: 208- 331 - 01,12,13 AND 208 - 341 -01. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, GPA 84 -04A is necessary to effectively inpi ment the Haven Avenia Overlay Disrict. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: 1. The arise, draent is consistent wl th the intent of the General Pian Land Use Policies. ?. The amendment promotes the goals of `:ie Land Use Element. 3. The amendment will not be materially injurious or detrimental to adjacent properties. U SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has Found that this General Plan hmendment will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment dnd recommends to the City Council, the issuance of a Negative --claration on December 12, 1984. NOW, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVED: 1. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommencs approval on the 12th day of December, 1984, of General Plan Amendment 84 -04A, as shown on the attached Exhibit "A ". J -1r� PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION General Plan Amendment 84 -04A Page #2 2. That a certified copy of the Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. APPRaVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY GF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY- Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, eputy ,ecretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plannina Commission held on the 12th day of December, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 0 da 1 Al RESOLUTION NO. op A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCPuMONGA PLANNING COMIMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT NO. 84 -04 - HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT - A CHANGE IN THE DISTRICT DESIGNATION: FROM OP TO ISP AND MH FOR AP ?ROXIMATELY 40 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE, BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ARROW HIGHWAY - APN: 208 - 331 - 01,12,13 AND 208 - 341 -01. WHEREAS, DDA 84 -04 is necessary to effectivly implement the Haven Avenue Overlay District; and, WHEREAS, on the 12th day of December, 1984, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1. The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: 1. That the subject property is suitable fnr the uses permitted in the proposed districts and 'the Haven Aft AyenUe Overlay in terms of access. size, and MP compatibility With existing land use in the surrounding area; and 2. That the proposed district change would rot have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and 3. That the proposed district change is in conformance with the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this project will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on December 12, 1984. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section -05850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 12th day of December, 1984, Development District Amendment No. 84 -04. 0 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION Development District Amendment No. 84-04 Page #2 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Development District No. 84 -04, as shown on the attached Exhibit "A ". 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF DECFMRFR_ 1984_ PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission uf the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing P.esolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held law on the 12th day of December, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: J -�q 11 I r I t ..I .71 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING ADPROVAL OF INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 34 -01 HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT EXPANDING THE BOJNDA.RY OF SUBAREA 7 (INDUSTRIAL PARK CATEGORY) TO INCLUDE APPROXIMATELY 40 ACRES OF LAND LOOATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE, BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ARROW HIG4WAY - APN 208 -331- 01,12,13 AND 208 - 341 -01. WHEREAS, Industrial Specific Plan Amendment 84 -01 is necessary to effectively implement the Haven Avenue Overlay District; and, WHEREAS, on the 12th day of December, 1984, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Co-.=ission has made the following findings: 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the Haven Avenue Overlay District and in Subarea 7 (Industrial Park Category) in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and ® 2_ That the nrnnnced industrial Specific Plan Amendment would not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and 3. That the orcposed Industrial Specific Plan Amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.. U SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this project will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on December 12, 1984. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 55855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 12th day of December 1984, ISP Amendment 84 -01. 2. 17e Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt ISP Amendment 84 -01, as shown on the attached Exhibit "A". J - am PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION ISP Amendment 84 -01 Page #2 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. APPROVED AND ADOPTED !HIS iLTH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout. Chairman ATTcST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that titz Foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of December, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: J -aa 11 E 0 11 L. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 12, 1984 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 646b - rLALA Ut LA ruaN'nH, LTD. - A di+,ision ,f 34.2 acres of land into 4 parcels >n the Industrial Fark District (subarea 6) located on the southwest corner of Arrow and Haven Avenue (APN 209- 092 -04) I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of Parcel Map. B. Purpose: To divide 34.2 acres of land into 4 parcels. C. Location: sc:ithwest corner of Arrow Route and Haven Avenue. D. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 - 8.3 acres Parcel 2 - 7.9 acres Parcel 3 - 10.0 acres Parcel 4 - 7.8 acres Total 34.2 acres E. Existing Zoning: Industrial Park District (subarea No. 6). F. Existing Land Use: Abandoned golf course. G. Surrounding Land Use: North - vacant. South - Existing Residential and Industrial. East - Vacant. West - Vacant. H. I looment North - Medium -High (14 -Z4 au /ac) ana UTTice/rrc South - Low (2 -4 du /ac) Development District. East - Industrial Park Category (subarea No. 6). West - Medium (8 -14 du /ac) Development District. nations: sionaI. I. Site Characteristics: This site slopes approximately 2% from north to soutfi. it is the site of an abandoned 9 -hole golf course and contains 317 trees, most of which were planted as a part of the golf course. ITEM M December 12, I'J64 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: The prrposed Parcel Map t ill divide the existing Property into 4 relatively large parcels. Specific development or a for the property have not be submitt-ed the e Cit a has�submitted oae s level n for nt the for the near future- but is not property in order '.o demonstrate that tattached for reference, acceptable manner. The master p royal tonight. r a formal submittal for Commission's app is The streets a nasome areas, additional, llstreet improved mentshbeyondl the developed. I rovide acceptable traffic parcel will be required in order to P circulation and drainage control- The interior street "A", en and "C" will be public streets. Street "A" will function as the main entrance to the parcels and will be designed with a median in order to preserve some existing trees• more drainage runoff ., will en g crate considerably the flows to Deer Development of the si then at present, therefore, a storm drain to convey be Creek Channel Two alternate oalignments ufo d theh storm drain are under developed. consideration (see zttacned exhibit) and one will be chosen and designed Map. prior to records *'an of the Parcel Also attached for your rth- eapnlicant consideration Staffhas is III. ENVIRGNMENTthe In t al Study as completed by and Part I of the env iionmentzl checklist, completed Part II of the Initial Study, Staff found no adverse impacts on has conducted afield investigation. fpon compl ation and review of e Initial Study and field investigation, proposed subdivision. the environment as a result of the P P have oeen sent to surrounding laced in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the IV. CORRESPONDENCE- Notices of Public Hearing property owners and p sitie has also been completed. approving tentative Parcel Map 8486 and V. RECDMMENDATIGN: It is recomnende� that the Planning Commission adopt t;�e attache` a so ution conditionally PP authorizing the issuance of a Negative Geclaration. ReWectf ully su `itte tchnnents: yap - Tentative & Vicinity Resolution City Engineer's Report I,;itial Study tee- a E. L--1 t .1 _IL 11 II II '1 I w z W rl L ILI 1 1 I'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY MAP IA -3 i n N i FYI title; P.M. page �=L oe '_ 1 s `11 1 r.� i� i3 1i. ;r ddb 1S � .t � � I'•3� �� —I L A t Ili - Ili � y F L n i J r, A t � v i, a V ! = S 3 11 ❑' E r r.� i� i3 1i. ;r ddb 1S � .t � � I'•3� �� —I L A t Ili - Ili � y F L n i J r, A t � v i, a V ! = S 3 11 ❑' E 2� - a f.. P Ilk f -• a vy}^RI - �Y '0 fl f 1 � • Q .. �� W.�Y - -riz' sw.ar 4 t. yr ` ,.a • t a., i f 11;I J Z tZ :Q iv 44 � STORM DRAW ALTERIV,gT1VE5 OF R -AWFIO CLTCA Nl()_\GA ENGINEERING I✓IVISION A -6 -'I Z' s i Z W' >{ c� Ti n N title; page 1 t I I 11 I t n N title; page 1 t I I 11 K 1J CIT" OF RANCHO CUCI �MONGA INITIA% STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION Si?EE ='- To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessmen_ Review Fee: $87,00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this fcr:d must be completed and sub-aitted to the Develoa-:ent Review C.om ^ittee through the department where the project application is m=ade. Upon receipt of this application, the Enviro=ental Azaly =-- staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Co.*-mittee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time. the project is to be heard. The Committee will make -,:e of three determinations: 1) The project will have no sign- ficant environmental intact and a Negative Declaration will b:: filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental Impact. and an Environmental imzact Report will be prepared, or 33 An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further in =crma- tion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Plaza de La %larcha AP=TLICP-NT'S NA %1E, ADDRESS, TEL`: ?ONE: i713) 1;,3 -dQ4n T _L_ NA"2, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONT__ -: D CONCER -KING THIS PROJECT: f$1$) 991 -3636 Dennis Hardarave, Luis Manzano E Associates. Inc. _ 31-v7-NT.- e, 9i LOCATION OF PRGJECT (STREET ADDR SS A-iD ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) Southwest corner, Haven Avenue E Arrow Route 709- 042 -04 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOC ?Z, REGIONAL, S-TATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY'ISSUTNG SUCH PERMITS: Tentative Paz cl Map by City of Rancho Cucarronga M - -I - PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:�Qmmercial /Industrial Par Pt tit pror,_Qriv to four e n to divide otc for SMe_,o �ndwTduals. Proposed i s s vouid be 'n cemQi ansg „�h {ndustria_ 3,je;5T!c Plan. Sub -Area o. ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA A?7D.SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING A'D PROPOSEL+ BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 37.89 acres. 2000± s.f. builriinn to do CA DESCRIBE THE ENVIROMMENTP_T. SETTING C? THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDI'.IG INFOR::YTION ON TOPOGRAP"r_Y, PLANTS ANI?1A%S, ANY CULTURA, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPF._,1'IES, AND TFE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): were punted to conjunction wittiaa There are no other cultural, histC and no animals were observed on The surround:nq north west and _restoent:al and Industrial uses on I to south at 1% to 2; It contains 31' Co excellent condition, most of whici- tow- abandoned nine -hole golf -purse. .cal, or scenic ascects on the prooerl to site other than transient LO:nmon b >ast properties are vacant, With alder Fe souih. Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series Of cty�ulative attic: s, which although individually s:aa11, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? While the Parcel Neap itself will not allow construction of any structures or parking facilities, the future Precise Plans for each lot will result in the removal of a number of the trees within the orrt,erty. Our Conceptu Site Plan suggests approach trees within the sitee. . +; saving a majority a ty of the larger, hlthier �Ml E 11 a WILL THIS .PROJEECT: YES NO x 1. Create a substantial change In ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or '..brati.on? Y X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal service= (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.) ? X 4. Create charges in the existing zoning or general plar. designations? X 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? Unknown X 6, Create the need for usQ or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, fla mmables or explosives? Explanation of ary YES answers above: As stated earlier, the Parcel Map itself will not directTcause the removal of trees. Future develoom . plans oy OT-hers tvr result rn t. a removal of an unknnwn rn.n .•a.. -P -_ IMPORTANT: If the project involves the constriczion of residential units, complete the form on the next pagL, CERTIFICATICN: I herebv certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial eva; to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additior_al information may be required to be submitted before ai_ adequate evaluation can be made by the Deve i- rtent Reev' ew Comzni.ttee. Date 5 -31 -84 Signat are 4-4 X4 / CTrir/ Title Consultant to Luis _Manzar;n1 r. a«nrlatPe ine . and Teachers Management E Investment Corp. M-9 N1- tc? RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The following information �aould be prbvided to the City of Rancho Planning Division in order to aid in district to accommodate the assessing the ability of the Cucamong school proposed residential development. Name of Developer =.nd Tentative Tract No.:_ Spe;.ific Location of Project: PHASE I PHASE 7 PHASE 3 PHASE S — C." 1. Number of single family units: 2. Number of multiple family units: 3. Date proposed to begin construction: 4..Earliest date of occupancy: Model and a of Tentative S. Bedrooms Price Ranee N1- tc? 11 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COKMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA.'CALdFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 8486 (TENTATIVE ?ARCEL MAP .10. 8486), LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND HAVEN AVENUE WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 8486, submitted by Plaza de La Mancha, Ltd. and consisting of 4 parcels, located on the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Haven Avenue, being a division of Lot a North Cucamonga Townsite ac ger Book 13, Page 15 of County of San 3ernardino and Iot.s 1 b 2, Block 50 of North Cucamonga tract per Book 4, Page 8 and the west "i2 of alley adjacent to said lots; and WHEREAS, on June 6, 1984, a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above - described Tentative Map; and WHEREAS. on December 12, 1984 the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above- described map. FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvenent of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause. substantial environmental damage, public, health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION ?: That this project will not create significant adverse environment acts and a Negative Deciaratior is issued on December 12, 19G4. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 8486 is approved subject to the recommenced Conditions of Approval pertaining thereto. M -11 s APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, rhairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of )ecember, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: M-- � a L E E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL LOCATION: Southwest Corner of Arrow TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP: 8486 Route and Haven Avenue • DATE FILED: June 6, 1984 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot A North Cucamonga NUMBER OF LOTS: 4 Township as oer Book 13, Page 15 of County GROSS ACREAGE: 34.2 of San Bernardino and lot 1 & 2 Block 50 ASSESSOR PARCEL NO: 209 - 092 -04 _ of 1Jorth Cucamon��Tract per Book 4, Page o anA the Wes T of ai ev adiacent sai ot5 1 2. DEVELOPER 0WNER ENGINEER/SURVEYOR Plaza deLa Mancha, Ltd Teazhers Management George Gal an is & Assoc. Corp. Offices TMI Bldg & Investment Co. 31320 Via Colinas, Ste I04 6 Upper Newport Plaza Same Add -ess Westlake Vlqe, CA 91362 Newport Bch, CA 92660 Improvement and dedication requirements in accordance with Title 16 of the Municipal Code of the City a Rancho Cucamonga include, but may not be limited ® to, the following: Dedications and Vehicular Access X 1. Offers of Dedications shall be made of all interior street rights -of -way. 2. Dedication shalt be made of the following rights -o' -way on the following streets: additional feet on auditional feet on additional feet on X 3. Corne- property line radius will be required per City Standards. X 4. All rights of vehicular ingress and egress shall be dedicated as follows: Haven Avenue and Arrow Route except `or street open: ng as shown on the tentative map 5. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joiGt „- iaint.enance of all commun roads, drives or parking areas shall ?,e provided by C.C.&R.s and shall be recorded concurrent with t^:� map. 6. All existing easements lying within future right -of -way are to be yl:itclaimed or delineated on the map per City Engineer's requirements. 7. Easements for sidewalk for public use shall be ,]edicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private prlperty. Surma X 1. Surety ;h-,Il s at i sf alit i on --arant -. im building perm be poster of the _� _t_ cVV�F! I et -T on it issuance and an agreement executed to the City Engineer and City Attorney, 'Lite of pabiic improvements prior to upon development of each parcel. X 2. A lien agreement must be executed prior to recording of the map for the following: '/2 median island on Haven Avenue X 3. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed, guaranteeing completion of all on -site drainage facilites necessary for dewatering all parcel> to the satisfartion of the Building ,rd Safety Divison prior to issuance of building permit upon development of each parcel Street Improvements Pursiant to the City of Ranch Cucajonga Municipal Code, Title 16, Section 16.3E.120, the subdivider may enter into an agreement and pose Security wits. the C °ty guaranteeing the required construction prior to recordation of the map and /or building permit issuance. 1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all inttricr streets. 2. A minimum of 26 -foot wide pavement within a 40 -foot aide dedicated right -of -way shall be constructed for a17 half - section streets. X� 3. Construct the following missing improvements: Prior to building permit issuance for development, of each parcel. street Name Curb & Gutter A.C. Side- Drive Pvmt. Walk Aopr. Street Trees Street Lights A.C. Overlay Median Island* Other Haven Ave. X X Meandering X X X Arrow Rte. X X Meandering X X X 26th St. X X X X X X X. °A° St. X X X X X X X °B° & °C° St X X X X X X Center Ave. X X X X X X *Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter is N!- 1L� X 4. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -:ray, fees shall -be paid and an encroachment permit, shall be obtained from t;.e City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permit; required. _ X 5. Street improvement plans shall be prepared by a Register-:d Civil Engineer and aoproved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. 6. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. X 7. Exist:.ig lanes of 12KV or less fronting the property shall be undergrounded. _ X 8. Install appropriate street name signs, traffic control signs, stripinq and markings with locations and types approved by the City Engineer. X 9. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company znd the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Lights shall be on decorative poles with underground service. X 10. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to and _ approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of ` ® building permit. 11. Concentrated drainaga flow:: shall not cross sidewalks. Undersidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards. Drainage and Flood Control rA X W] 1. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated or noticed on the final map. 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 3. The following storm drain shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer (see Special Conditions 3 & 4). 4. Prior to recordation of the map, a hydrologic :!Pd drainage study for the project shall be submitted to the Cit; Engineer for review. 5. A drainag: detention basin peg• City Standards shall be constructed to detain increased runoff M- lS Grading X 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. - The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading plan. X 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work prior to issuance of building permit. s. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application or grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Grading Committee and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subc:ivision map or issuance of building permit whichever com-s X 5. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division fo approval prior to issuance of building permit. General Requirements and Approvals X 1. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: CaiTrans for San Bernardino toulTy F ood Lontrof District X Cucamonga County Water District for sewer and water X San Bernardino County Dust Abatement (required prior to issuance of a grading permit) Other ? A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Res: ctions (C.C. &R.$) approved by the City A;;torney is required prior to recordation of the map. �( 3. Provide all utility services to each lot including sewerage, wate :, electric power, gas and telephone prior to street constructon. X 4. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County 'Mater District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. X 5. This subdivisio- shall be subject to conditions of approval from San Bernaro..o County Flood Control District. X 6. App:--Avals have not been secured from all utilities and other ir•terested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. '( 7. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not r`- 1(.0 guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County W.-'er District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. B. Local and M,aster Planned Trails shall be provided in accordance with the Trail Plan. A detailed trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing and weed control, in accordance wish City trail standards, shall !�e submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to recordation for and /or prior to building permit issuance for 9. Prior to recording, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District 82 -1 among the newly created parcels. X 10. At the time of final map submittal, the following shall be submitted: Title Report, traverse calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and /or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marxs referenced. SPECIAL CONDITIONS X 1. In order to facilitate the development of the individua: parcels and assure the preservation of as many existing trees as possible, the interior streets "A ", "S" and "C" shall be designed by the Developer's Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to recordation of the Final Parcel Map. X 2. The streets adjacent to each parcel shall be constructed upon development of each parcel. If the parcels are developed individually, it may be necessary tc construct Street improvempnts in addition to those immediately adjacent to the parcel order to provide proper drainage control and traffic circul<.t '% The precise limits of these improvements shall be as app:-ove by the City Engineer. X 3. The f6 lotiing drainage items shall be completed by the Developer's Engineer ant approved by the City Engineer prior to recordation of the Final Parcel Map: a. A precise drainage study, and b. The design of a storm., drain system to conduct flows from the site to Deer Creek Channel. X 4. The noted storm drain shall be constructed with the first parcel to be developed and shall be so stated in the Parcel Map improvement certificate. op f.. a CITY OF ;•q • �' LLOYD a. by- .40..� .:f Ni 0 11 CI'i'ii OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORx DATE: December 12, 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission , FROM: Rick Gomez, V!.�' I canner By: Rancy Fong, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84 -51 - REI ER - The development of 4 office bui dings totaling 7Z-, -51T square feet on 5.68 acres of land in the Industrial Park (Subarea 6) and Haven Avenue Overlay Districts at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and 7th Street - APN 209- 401-13. ;. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of site plan, elevations and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Puraose: Construction of 4 office buildings totaling 75,512 square feet. C. Location: Northeast corner of Haven Avenue and 7th Street. D. Parcel Size: 5.68 acres of land. E. Existing Zoning: Industrial Park (Subarea 6), Haven Avenue Overlay District. F. Existinq land Use: Vacant. G. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant; Industrial Park (Subarea 6), Haven Avenue Overlay District. South - Vacant; Industrial Park (Subarea 6), Haven Avenue Overlay District. East - Light Wholesale /Distribution; Industrial Park (Subarea 6). Best - Vacant; Industrial Park (Subarea 6). ITEM N PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Environmental Assessment & DR 84 -51 - Reiter December 12, 1984 Page 2 H. General Plan Desi nations: Project Site - Industrial ?ark. North - Industrial Park. South - Industrial PLrk. East - Industrial Park. Vest - industrial Park. I. Site Characteristics: Proiect s,te slopes to the south at approximately a 2- A grade. This site is undeveloped and is covered by indigenous weeds with no structures. J. Applicable Regalat.ons: Th project site falls under the adopted Haven Avenue ,nterim Development Policies and is within the ,pending Haven Avenue Overlay District. The Overlay District has designated Haven Avenue as an intensive, high quality gateway to the community. The primary use is intended to be ;if an administrative /professional and office nature with a ma:: ?mum of 20» ancillary commercial and business support use, not to be concentrated in any one building or along the street frontage. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The developer has previously submitted development plans for this location, which was denied by the Planning Comrniss4on on September 12, 1984 due to the fact that the propesed project was not in compliance with the adopted Interim Development Policies for Haven Avenue. The developer has totally redesigned new development plans for this location base! on the Interim Development Policies for Haven Avenue. The new proposes± project consisted of 4 office buildings, a large plaza area that provides interconnections between the buildings, and major parking area to the interior of the site. Buildings 1 and 2 front on Haven Avenue and project an urbai character with their blue glazing glass exterior that wraps around the building sides, and the variation in building height. The interior elevations of the buildings f•:cing the plaza area consist of mainly sandblasted texturized concrete with the same theme of blue glazing glass area. Aczess to this project shall be provided from 7th Street and Acacia Aver•pe. 8. FIsi n Review Committee: The Design Review Committee has viewe the protect an found that the overall site plan with its building orientation, style of architecture, plaza area and location of parking area comply with the Development Policies of Haven Avenue. The Committee has recommended approval of the project provided that the following improvements be made which the developer has agreed to: % -a E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Environmental Assessment & DR 84 -51 - Reiter December 12, 1984 Page 3 1. The plaza area shall be provided with more pedestrian oriented facilities such as: shaded seating area with attractive landscaping, fountains, public art and /or Kiosks, benches, trash receptacles and other street furniture. 2. The project's landscaping shall have an overall theme with special landscape treatment along Haven Avenue and the entrance to the plaza area. The special landscape treatment shall be designed to accentuate the arch'tecture of the project. C. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee has reviewed the project and determined that with the recommended conditions of approval the project is consistent_ with the applicable standards and ordinances. 0. Grading Committee: The Grading Committee has approved the conceptua. l grading plan subject to an approved final grading prior to the issuance of building permits. E. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the app icant. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist and determined that no significant environmental impact will occur as a result of this project. A copy of Part II of the Environmental Checklist is attached for your review and consideration. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the Industrial Area Specific Plan, interim Development Policies of Haven Avenue, and the General Plan. The project will not be detrimental to adjacant properties or cause significant environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed site and building designs, together with the recommended Conditions, are in compliance with the Industrial Area Specific Plan, the Interim Development Policies of Haven Avenue, and City standards. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has beer, advertised for Environmental Review in The Taily Report newspaper. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is reco=ended that the Planning Commission approve DR 84 -51 with the attached *_eiditions and issue a Negative Declaration. Ree.soeecctful lyxsubmitted, Aick,domez1 rCity' Planner P RG_NF:ns PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Environmental Assessment & DR 84 -51 - Reiter December 12, 1984 Page 4 Attachments: Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit QX11 s ctin roiL Initial Resolut "A" - Location Map /Industrial Specific Plan "B" - Haven Avenue Overla} District "C" - Site Plan "D" - Landscape Plan "E" - Grading Plan "F' - Eievations Study, Part I1 ion of Approval with Conditions t'k -1� u E CIRCULJ:TION_ 120' R.Q.W. mew 100' R.O.W. ® 88' or less R.O.W. RAIL SERVICE i i a++ Existing + + -+ Proposed TRAILS /ROUTES o o o o Pedestrian s s Bicycle (~ �� Regional multi-Use ---��^ Special Streetscape/ Landscaping Power Line/ Utility Easement Creeks & Channels `-'J r — i Bridge 4 Access Points Park OF Fire Station 4;O 400 800 1600 I en u FORTH CITY OF � 'NCHO CC�CAMONGA TITL.E:I " f / - - she &�-, -. 0 PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: " SOLE- e _ rA -s FiG. V -t HA V E E P OVERLAI ®ISTRIC1 -�� Urban Cente u Bridge 3" Access Points Park n% Fire S'.12jon �1 F C, �.,es 0 400-800 1600 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANT IONGA PLANNUSU DIVM)N 1 NORTH ITEXI: . T r'E= ��qw EXHIBIT- SCALE: IA - Q, Overlay Dist i TRAILS /ROUTES 1000 Pedestrian 0000 Bicycle (I= Regional Multi -Use Special Streets, - Landscaping —__ Power Line/ Utility Ease men' <—• Creeks & C.-tare u Bridge 3" Access Points Park n% Fire S'.12jon �1 F C, �.,es 0 400-800 1600 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANT IONGA PLANNUSU DIVM)N 1 NORTH ITEXI: . T r'E= ��qw EXHIBIT- SCALE: IA - Q, ><.Y .lw `+• \.. �, Yo �1 C s 4 ■ r � • � 4 A ` .��." ASKS I' '■ ■■ ■D 1 { - •�•, -, Raw [ C 'Am"s sup ■ bt: > • I i; er it 1 d i; er it 1 "7 r; i; er it 1� .,tom t� l / 1� .,tom t� I :I ..... BU[DPK) 3 I 1 �� s:c so )) eumcdu.a. I v.o vue log) s r aa. w 1 • � lw sv��J •.., •�v .. _........ BU QOHCi � � � � �l , M1. tllt•r f� •'J um na. (. �'{'�� i •i i) UULDr* (iii K I Fi�l-I lii'1 . , '.. )i tii{ . nn saau s 1 FORTH CITE' or, • ITEM: W. RANCHO CUCA I0NGA TiTL.E- PLANNING ©IVEION C; HIBIT- SCALE: FILING DATE• %! A PROJECT: 11 y r 1 CITY OF'RANC$0 CUCAMONGA PART II - INITIAL STUDY EIrVIRONMENTAL CHEC?ZLIST PROJECL LOCATION: I. ENXIRON"T-NTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets). TES MAYBE NO 1. Soils and Geoloay. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or burial of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface contour intervals? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any potential increase in wind or water erosion of soils, affecting either on or off site conditons? f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, ffsd- slides, ground failure, or similar hazard.? h. An increase in the rate of extraction and%or / _ use of any mineral resource? INNV// 2. Hydrology. Will the proposal have significant results, in: 3. Air Quality. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile or indirect sources? Stationary sources? b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or interference with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? c. Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? 4. Biota Flora. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or number of any species of plants? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? N _ \IA y; V Page 2 YES M4YBE NO a- Changes in currents, or the course of direction Of flowing streams, rivers, of ephemeral stream ®? channels? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, — or the rate and amount of surface water f runoff: ✓ c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? _ d. Change in the amount of surface water in any body of water? e. Discharge into surface waters, or any alteration of surface water quality? f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? g. Change in the quantity of 2roundwaters, either through direct additionb nr with- drawals, or through interference with an aquifer? Quality? r Quantity? 9�! h. The reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for public water supplies? i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or seiches? 3. Air Quality. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile or indirect sources? Stationary sources? b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or interference with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? c. Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? 4. Biota Flora. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or number of any species of plants? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? N _ \IA y; V ?age 3 YES MAYBE NO c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of / plants into an area? -3/ d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural production? Fauna. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Orzzmze in the characteristics of Cn:. ipc_ including diversity, distribution, or numbers of any species of an4-1s? b. Reduction of the numbers of anv unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or wildlife habitat? S. Population. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of the hc1--.r, population of an area? b. Will the prcposal affect existing housing, or / create a demand for additional rousing? 6. Socio- Economic Factors. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in local or regional Socio- economic characteristics, 3acluding economic or commercial diversity, tax rate, and property values? b. Will project costs be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax payers or project users? 7. Land Use and Planrin¢ Considerations. Will the proposal have significant results in? ppp a. A substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, ` policies, or adopted plans of any governmental entities? c. An impact upon the qulaity or c,antity of existing consumptive or non -cor omptive recreational opportunities? 'k Page 4 YES MAYBE NO 8. Transportation. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? ' b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for new street construction? c. Effects on existing parking facilities._ or o demand for new parking? d. Substantial impact upon existing transporta- tion systems? e. Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion cr movement of people and /or goods? f. Alterations to or effects on present and potential water - borne, rail, mass transit or �/ air traffic? 6/" g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 9. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, A paleontological, and /or historical resources? 10. _health, Safetv, and Nuisance Factors. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous, substances in the event cf an accident? d. An increase in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? e. Increase in existing noise levels? - _f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous noise levels? g. The creation of objectionable odors? h. An increase in light or glare? NA - �p Page 5 YES '%Y3E NO 11, Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic vista or .yiew? _ b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site? !/ C. A corflict vt rh rho t recta.__ oa �.: sis.,at =d or potential scenic corridors? — 12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal have a significant need for ndw systems, or alterations to the following: a. Electric power? b. Natural or packaged gas? c. Co=unicatiors systems? d. Water supply? e. Wastewater facilities? £. Flood control structures? g. Solid waste facilities? r h. Fire protection? 1. Police protection? J. Schools? k. Parks or other recreational. facilities? ✓/ I. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads and flood control facilities? x. Other governmental services? 13. Energy and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy? c. An increase in the demand for development of new sources of energy? d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumption of non - renewable forms of energy, when feasible renewable sources of energy are available? C e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or scarce natural resource? 14. Mandatory Findings of Siznificance-. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to - --W-. c a plant or animal comm pity, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short -term, to the disadvantage of long -term, environmental goals? (A short -term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long- term imparts will endure well into the future). c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but c•.m-,ilatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, and probable future Drojects). d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Page 6 YES -"AYBE no II. DISCUSSION OF MMR0'Zf-2" -AL EVALUATION f r ; the abate questions plus a discussion of(i op o_ a_f_- ttiive answers . to Proposed mitigation measures). N-�8 E W, C III. DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect or. the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. _ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant j effect or. the environment, there will not be a significant effect S.._..J in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet h----c been added to the project. A NEGAZlvE DECLARATION STILL BE PREPARrn , DI find the proposed project AIRY have a significant effect_ on the envirnment, and an 0VIROMIENT L*-TACT REPORT is required. Date Page 7 — % RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 84 -51 LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND 7TH STREET IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT (SUBAREA 6). WHEREAS, on the 5th day of November, 1984, a complete application was filed by A. H. Reiter Development fur review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 12th day of December, 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above- described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and tv 2. That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Dever = Code; and 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the puhlic health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. O SECTION 2. That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a NegativE Declaration is issued on December 12, 1984. SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 84 -51 is approved subject to the following conditions and attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. The plaza area shall be provided with more pedestrian `G10 Resolution No. Page 2 oriented facilities such as. shaded seating area with attractive landscaping,. fountains, public art and /or kiosks, benches, trash receptacles and other street furniture. 2. The landscaping shall have an overall theme with special landscape treatment along Haven Avenue and at the entrance of the plaza area. The special landscape treatment shall be designed to accentuate the architecture of the Droie :t. A minimum of PnY cnorimoa civc tr�c ch, ll do provided for this project. 3. Trash enclosure shall be designed per the City standards. 4. A uniform sign program shall be required and shall be a separate permit. 5. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated, shielded . .gym view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties. lletails shall be included in building plans. ENGINEERING DIVIS ON I. Notice of intention to join the proposed median island Is landscape maintenance district shall be filed with the City Council prior to the issuance of building permits. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1484. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary 1, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission h<,ld on the 12th day of December, 1984. by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: tV -a - yr d�uobd }:> 9°ca ow -a °c .o+• = =p -Z 10 .ik O O�Y q GyFy>% L� O y V�/ W •'/ y' p +q O O C y A V q'O y'�C dEO d 4pC O.V. •i Gt Q: 6iq d up Q ay� w� •^i G +� b C 4 w= p PU C� S�^ �0„SV L L ^ N�>n0 V•wNCd pOyg6 >O� V�`9 � G 'Cp O.VM�� rNO V..• = O4 ~nLgCr PG CY rVJ V -•�J qp p�G gp n?ICn 'i�•pp• dcLd L`cr dndi0 'O =�c.o M y� V C N ✓� D V O V P O V D= �.N,r2 Cy�VC +J C9 ot_fD.O•d EV'DeN OG /L,/�r �» =O�jVN • p pt 6�Od9 9C6CN dam• D��+ CI p� _ 6 p d d N 6 0 D > -• V 'u N COL C PdONr TS 9L.0 T = ^C L •.+ ^G '^q COi q00 LO•p ^N� O.Gr >p V��J`L ��✓ DO.o>d 9. Nt qCV C q O �w• N r b ^ D d C �^ O N � 4 4 0€ O rV +r�/L +CL Cr -b- ^AMD � +9 .�. Y•JNs >• ST�.��'O Zr C N•.• C^ N +6 d O V V 0 vJi i i •L/ q N o i a — °.::.°• �FjI d`CC yiy +�. a +cd .-� v cLc dL—L 6�VC .�Jd•- C VI �pODN 6V'V� tNwyYj i 0 n u Ny O O O V V R 2 H 2 N 6 O U J 4 J a- qo a= wL•L- ° =o m d.. �•' �L oD >��q •' c ro ry =r Lw� LOC/r gip+ OO.�?s Od =q ` V T ; �V ry O J V r N= L C4'ld O.V V ^N r pqN ° €OCN¢La� DNi -s N� p T V C d J p ^ 6 N C 2�= 3YCr O NCOg9 CO6 �CO�b�d 6v +P 'eqp <V•'l _yLC P� ^L do JUOe � QF ✓E O•L" ^� UNIT Q.Or P6 i`o9mJ Et u�uu <.°e xto � I i T Y. N V r } O. N E •/ C d u p � V • jl V N � V + tT > r PNT •O+ ON 6A NL_�`L 9q d r d G OLN dd.L.•OL + IN��DLf�•r.i 06p y0 � •V O M O �- O� d y =�� �` L g szz 6 L d N V = L O 9 a O •n . y. �" 9 r dam` d >��b. c -gpi6 V 9 4 O T C t 6C �O 6 C/r >•Cn C O V•+ �VL-. y V 9Cr G S O.P -d/�Vbd 4 9C J Opp Lpp w ^ O O � LCy.r?uDL{• Y � r� V Q SN M d •J i M •• N_ f D Z yd O p 6 9 r 9 W+ Z w 9 N L Y r E p i L L C P O- N O✓ C y_ L L Y Ll V L O M O u l 4 w Y 4 d y y G u F.r°iYN q LQJ° «�d p „.rr. °cN L= CD Vq 2G.E L q q N r N V O L O c r <^ 9 S q m < >✓ N C_ 6 r ^ d O P S r d V �. O✓ , y� p 6 L V q O N .w � X 0 6 � �= N M d C • C °= �L ag4�.�L qqj V06V Efg1CT LL✓ 9 ...� «Q �Ly9 "�. P d dt.Vi,C Lei LL 9«Nr = L ✓� q Oq9 • LSO ✓ ^_L."JJ ✓ C( u L ._.. ✓ d L O J E N• q 01 � q y Y �i `..�E ^O L�L <LL °N OL r�PMya N,Jir . q <dw dd� Oq L OOd�O ^LN 6.Sn.d }dL N V� >Lyy Crbr VU ^V c 7 e c P y O _ J V q ` u 0 3 7 •Q 'mil C _r. -i.�N Vd ✓C dd ^_ R^ t d< Z C L C � N q c L O q V Y.. t ... V L ✓ 9 J✓ r r q d V O.p. V N J V� q ✓` O L C a d N N �� 2 M O ✓� - �cCa ` q L-d•c a � L4i =�`._ vat «c $_✓ yQ� � -�a "'C r aL -° au�' L- -•-YO6 l Z ; -• .Orru'� ^qP V� r' .O •y ->. ^.-pNN O r_ C^ C' F N o C V < .°e r uN.•W qN NCgL d9 P� �L�' VY ^YqN -�L .L S_ qu9dL. _CU?O ti NgO LiVC^ _ V d y .^ d NV - n« u 4c ` � n =c✓ dam. - a. ffr,. q a` • C .nyM d�L b T. •'•q _ H DO O.r qL'p 'q P_ �q/LC L r 20 P��NNy O <N �' Pr n✓ 02G -Z Cdl du p 9 V p q a ✓< W O C C -. q y C O V a q> ^ V _O O V VO �J V N y r N Y J'.2 ` h L N L. y> J e^ ppO O W a n .ar. ✓ L V n < .Ge q G q- N CqY 4i `r < CN q✓T. p pNC� 1r0 O Vdi WSJ qd P���YY ✓N V_Cr dVU rG q C@ � <O^a Odr.� pprnP L u eLe .LU J V V d C g q E n PL Z.2 i L L r_ OV V O 6 p� ✓pp ' L p 9 V V d G N �. M M 4V. V r .-n R O c C N N C O C L V U G •V+ dy C _ L 9 �� 2 L .-. ESE Q ]� Y 6>6ci 7c :5 MO 6 0.rm lz r G= L; 8 L^ N d N c O ✓ ✓ d C V N v V }- V O YL. �rVC _E ' S r C _` Li�� O.t..r rL •'y L t G O V< O Y, q✓ L a N L> 1- C Y = - � q✓ L M j` d q � nC. N r> q}a L N n W L V✓ w •-^ C- O O.�a � M L� � E 9� L✓ C a e� C .O i s 2 g c r 2 t _ -G «� CE / 9 N V = V CO q✓ M u ` = cc •w l<2 Q N V N N S L L � y ^ P S N L w. V V tl P7 q V v C C O F N d y L C n r -0 L Pr q y n- =rp Na aP rya �•�sai '°° cG L'c c° 82.E Y q N U G O l G C V r r C+ q r V t q V L P q p ✓ _ E V q ✓✓ N O q T J O q U l •` aq __ er�v eEy sn _ se• _ _ z voQn ICA wz u md.Ji. .V.. -s yc ya 4 c dd C N °O -9 y Ca� OO�pL OC •'S C WL .4vC G� pfd O E CAA .O PC q•JCCr a V.ra �LV Qp.W VI <M�� < WQ q ^NONP C_a2- O <1cc CNi ° � O O r p O L p T. b O > .VU q <^ a V_ C -J - O' y q g C L 4 •+ N d N q p Nq `nom C • Gy- C cl q y r N�PL' l0 > - S y J L y L d Lr d q c• r y 6 C q ✓_ < ._ L V O a � V C U `q J O O 0 «.� O N y S 4 =.. q _V V M C • O M N V • r V O ..) q J W �� 6 t i_ L .> �^ 2✓ O. Q � p<^ u �- a y: N N NON N c G. � }� JO ✓q EtVa` =L q�VVgLr6 C q��� Q q�pr °� TL y C O __ ^ M O _N P.Y.. V. ✓< YL J P_ V N T e< O Y C> N- O D y` ¢ L^ r C N qSl q Pq _ �MJ L'M^ OVd •. c _� ��a- Cy�LCE dymL �.pw CCa.0 n�EO _.V4 G fC O <�•NL l`.qA <V C 6 V Pte- rtiY NC q L'�R!<q ° 6 FrG p N -a3 E G C :� d• L L C t J• d � CCCCy � \``\ yy6, qA••O•� dYS D�V �w� Cqy C 9 C b G 9 V q O O L 7 q x__111 9 ✓Dj J P q A y N L l r d D r L C V N C C N d V V M d n J C N n L c, C rVJr.ri• °r �09 �cc d C Y d O O✓ O � A P y r w O Y' Y r P N O V C d l AVUd\'V 6 ^y0 i �d T✓ GV T. � L O O �D� Nye r6 PPC Nj�O r q C�Iir -d�j ± O G; L N�'6J r L i L. rA0 Od dA d JM09 �9CF L aPTI -y ^.� CN iL P CCL -�. C..0 A CV ^ A bC> aN.s.• dqm � L r ^_ l r V C N S P A O L D O N C V qIJ =C� Jl]. N •n r`D NS.�C P V C N•• ✓A O_ 0 N U P g 0 •J O. C D •rn = a r Y d C 6 C d O° Q O d i -S ' a •^a i✓ _ C ...Q`�Pn s Tr Ae oM av_ c 4 t d srd v�.bi� cp q DVS U r O C C 4 C q ± r✓ L C u ^ PN a N 9^ C d 0 9 N N � C C S O J � r •r 1'i d U d �0 q 0 0° C D r N N •n Q VL C L � -. � n M O� y O O C Q.•I �' Q V L V N �^ T _ nJ�C NyL c V8'.0 UN A_ -O It - L N q ✓.� r bd •^NU• TLp�S N1 PL Pr rLinN 1p P V yNY Ay i� O"�p nC PL' AL N� `B q ✓L O O.OTa� •di L O Pn06 Cqw CTC ✓O.O Cr �C A•.L. VV�T CG a N r TAj L•D.•tq MZ C •'• qC =` ....0 r• •N -.'✓C C SJm g C q c O c 9A Y V g C r U S N C° �. C O r 9 C r V C •r s✓ 1 9 y N 9 A O G -9 `oyN•Qn pT^ o ` 9Q Eb'L �. �^N• c r c c ic= 66 cO G V= q T V L N " O OP -.NE •O -giq.J A TPnr �'�' -'�yP r i � •ai�A °� ^L Or•A �... -r. s, s,� Nso JA — °c o^ry `: `zNNW ° N :'�—°• aacc ��:°. <✓�SNdW 6A -00. < WoAO.N a q ti 4 dP OC l UC' P CC d -nJp N�qi L Cr• Jq qr 9 �' ✓ _A q >- ^ApC • ^ -•Oi� .O PCJ qi O n n N L N n - Q` G N q -J N C •� � O. P A- O.•[ •r.•Nn� NC` rpr _✓6C H ON O_ N•' d✓ P O l~ � N OCR N•T.Lq ��j NDO �• p�j •'°J C V r r r qZ -ZN „ in O PS S 6 �'. � dM O j VO s =u uc Z P q Z. N. -t y u MN v �y p d -��> 6y �' M�C •r >C C A� V q ✓b - = 0- T> O ! j L.J c C^N a'• L= V CEN •QC GjrN. V^ O r^ N O C y N C r ` ••' j� S 6 n G N I cc G ^ b p i U 6• q N J L q .n 4' 9.-..• n L S- d 6' O SI c= VC V n LNU•' =q C'. j� Q�L C'VOV 6 - t C r y N r` C_ O n_ 6 C L A 0 r M w x I j A 6 C C P, •� p •^ 4 O >•y d T 00 l< C6✓ q ^G' LET qCC d� 9u i N e`• c Lm >_ qLT r ovro b.�q �y J� �� � =°•, r ^; M��u �`-v `a_cari •`'d'pni _ ri_ Ac °° G J N_✓ 9 L O L C G ^ a O O r c .c°� c cn� �.°.c a�cN =a n_�D _c '^a ` ../ °�i q'O .Ji .`.cn a s" o icy aA.• =MU _o °q4- F.T+� N� �� C. � L 6 w A U � r � ; d r N e Q� N S y� _Q • V° -° J N C N C� V F a y N Y a � �"• P a p 'J- 6l` t ry L ^C V0� LOV O r1L. CLC 'OA y CCG PS w n „•"' O•0t aGe• Oq C Y V O � t�• r 0 P✓ < tI CC `° a vL - pNr LQN 2 d r•rr• = O •'= y�r4 ccy ov r�r� E G`p wLN y' p C C.r _ O pp Z C Y 9 V> d d.-• > T > V e 9 ,C- > t C N p N < V < C O �< p A W V �• 4 6 2 N� •rw 4 N < N- M-0 H N Z M O Z .1..1 V m 0 L d e° c c u u i i V O C ° m d u O 4 a M W d Y .L. O 4 N V L dM �� c :.L a u4L D \ •J V ° u c� =c C � 4 Z � •J r - .�_ V 4� y PC P�V L o, P_ ,Y —Ymc \Yr q°q OrNd 4 P P A O O c E �... :•L+Ln V cq ° ` C V r q r iVi m -Lr` xr y,VP S -nm' crr —c y e o o a e L O � d_ 7 d NE �rE = °ices O C - L � v =- G r G L =? `> O V O C ° m d u O 4 a M W d Y .L. O 4 N V L dM �� c :.L a u4L D \ •J V ° u c� =c C � 4 Z � •J r - .�_ V 4� y PC P�V L o, r° GLD Z d q q - n C .:= ■ Fcan V e CCC• Fd= Psi c yy�E .X Fe` 7 W u N O O V P'0 J Y O C n D O C O r _ c r = V '• � r f rV C O �G CCCY N R Dr 0 v ° _ L C' q L c v 6 a O 0 C i u r L G 'Y V D I'^ 7 g G I� V t r O ..Q Z5 4 q P L VLIPNO Rte• VC II !I '•- O c � C o °Ca y- ro- o L a y V L d C c •du = _a •r1ii =— q:a� o�co Jv A- c r °'•u •J dr0 e+z -cR rc 9 y q 4 f e Q 66LL-- V G q C O N J y N V_ ` G r _ Y U 4 0 G L U V � aoy << vs "d °Gy `bC ECG \ O G' °• q Y I �► 01 � ra � u c 4 P A O O c E �... s c u y y6r O C - `> v _ f •' C L L 4 ` 4 ° L q V_ NQ Q P LU r _ yC L= -. Or .0 ddPd yq q ••_,.. o u P M V p Q Pr r y q C N O M •^ e V! O� CF NnV q NN <`4L 6 =S' tr •I N ' � < C� N ! 1 r r° GLD Z d q q - n C .:= ■ Fcan V e CCC• Fd= Psi c yy�E .X Fe` 7 W u N O O V P'0 J Y O C n D O C O r _ c r = V '• � r f rV C O �G CCCY N R Dr 0 v ° _ L C' q L c v 6 a O 0 C i u r L G 'Y V D I'^ 7 g G I� V t r O ..Q Z5 4 q P L VLIPNO Rte• VC II !I '•- O c � C o °Ca y- ro- o L a y V L d C c •du = _a •r1ii =— q:a� o�co Jv A- c r °'•u •J dr0 e+z -cR rc 9 y q 4 f e Q 66LL-- V G q C O N J y N V_ ` G r _ Y U 4 0 G L U V � aoy << vs "d °Gy `bC ECG \ O G' °• q Y I �► 01 � ra � u c Ll lu �t a N c d Ld`oo i o N c c � r N C V 6 0 x q J ��w Ell ° V L � y v v u i` --• T i =am ti a _ LY gO cr —v V S S N OC 6 l rl NI " Or!C^ LOO CLG1jN _ O q _ � d • •^u � r r •J ` V L ° � C •. T= � V^ q O N r C r C� O L P• P .°i L C N •+ V B .Ci G q N C� • � 9 q 'C q V G i. N` V N r Q � >• vq v 1� � c r _ � W O O �• .Vr J C q •' � N r O CJ O'_ q •"' ,` � C_ C i• 'J N L 7 r E �' O C •2. p V -� n V O > 4 p r q= C. r O C v n C V V'.9 C l Gr- •- C LCCV pS�C�jj CL�riq uG Nr " O� O T y O q r w• `p C r rd C' _ V � D x u S EL T^ ii an I L V YC O V✓ d O i O u q i �� T 6 E F, r� y i q C L C ,�i. C N G C V U 9 y"."•j C. q N P` � G a r P C g O L J C 'w N L rw '• � >N`a b °6 � C ••�NjL uq E Tb .rC 6 c ✓ O � E r L O � C; � COO ' a d N y. .+ L C ,a r'i G -7E =7 0 0 o E y x c• E,^ ` .. u a P C.� b D CT r d s r Cl�q L J LC N C V 5!C c dN D O � C.- CC C C � L dC C V_ • -. C OrM q ^E•dq y V WN •-i• ^CgNq ^p ��at.r ?dam• .- . C O,•+ 6 V. i O• GOLN P ,r,. •. ..a `� C' fVj C ^ C E O N� � V �^•� C 4 ^ P C V O N O T � N N ,Li, i •- O Q = � WI -ae ^I <I I I 1 Ll lu �t a N c d Ld`oo i o N c c � r N C V 6 0 x q J ��w Ell ° V L � y v v u i` --• T i =am ti a _ LY gO cr —v V S S N OC 6 l rl NI c " Or!C^ LOO CLG1jN _ O q _ � d • •^u � r r •J ` V L ° � C •. T= � V^ q O N r C r C� O L P• P .°i L C N •+ V B .Ci G q N C� • � 9 q 'C q V G i. N` V N r Q O O �• .Vr J C q •' � N r O CJ O'_ q •"' ,` � C_ C i• 'J N L 7 r E �' O C •2. p V -� n V O > 4 p r q= C. r O C v n C V V'.9 C l Gr- •- C LCCV pS�C�jj CL�riq uG V " O� O T y O q r w• `p C r C C' q L_ � D r=`` L V C� O V✓ d O i O u q i �� T 6 E F, r� y i q C L C ,�i. C N G C V U 9 y"."•j C. q N P` � G a r P C g O L J C 'w N L rw '• � >N`a b °6 � C ••�NjL uq E Tb .rC 6 c ✓ O � E r L O � C; � COO ' a d N y. .+ L C ,a r'i G C.� D CT r O-r rrL Cl�q L J LC N C V 5!C JI dN D O � C.- CC C C � L dC C V_ • -. C OrM q ^E•dq y V WN •-i• ^CgNq ^p ��at.r ?dam• .- . C O,•+ 6 V. i GOLN P ,r,. q Y C ..a `� C' O V .- 6. D i d ^ C E O N� � V �^•� C 4 ^ P C V O N O T O Q = � WI -ae c - au� r W y PO .r q CN N N L 2 N O j C d L q' L N Z ✓ f V r ' d L Q � C✓ r C .� 7 V V P� !>1 O � V` u I V g Q —O � q y L N L pQCC q cV LSO C✓ -'a LT I ✓b Ob v`e -✓ �T_umM r eN uu °w c�u yP d� qG FS' ° N ° � u o W D 4.r > .� O° �✓ E � �. a ° G C v N L O O. V q a l ✓ N M� V .°. u O E L n l T T l V O d D G OI y^ ' °✓ O c N - q � L� r V P g V 9 0 P N. L M y G y✓ L 9 � C l G DLO > C ` L O � ✓ . 9 V S W d V r � ° O r q G E �• nLd.. � C 0 0 L a> c C F u E C L r V ` O r C F r i L C c P O C 2 f^ b } C d 0 e 6 v° r V • 0 6 W L C G L� NW Ny�rd Q L C�rV _PU dr r L v 4 u as -N' v � ✓ "' L �. YLd.. c 'o" S U L Q N Q C ^✓ � W Q `a L L L 72 t= V V N S ✓ E q L G V q✓ � > d 4 f C O O C y i L Cr P > q r c E�ag C C^ r Q S q 9 P Tr Z � c,ce- cNC6r o r �c _ r d L q ` = ✓ L O iq° RC'° ✓b o �' a °C °� C L 'n ° u VyC q✓ V L - q � l V C d p N d✓ u 6 V N 6W 9 � t N Y N O ✓✓ N ,p I I O L b N u .. c u - P L c r W N T d✓ qu d 6✓ V T y L V> 0 O G q q � O s w Z T� V L L ne c O' ycy � V � o.- F N d N L N V PI 11 6 Ell c� °N I C V u c'o C N J 6 a N 3 u i C G � 7 u u v N r i L C c P O C 2 f^ b } C d 0 e 6 v° r V • 0 6 W L C G L� NW Ny�rd Q L C�rV _PU dr r L v 4 u as -N' v � ✓ "' L �. YLd.. c 'o" S U L Q N Q C ^✓ � W Q `a L L L 72 t= V V N S ✓ E q L G V q✓ � > d 4 f C O O C y i L Cr P > q r c E�ag C C^ r Q S q 9 P Tr Z � c,ce- cNC6r o r �c _ r d L q ` = ✓ L O iq° RC'° ✓b o �' a °C °� C L 'n ° u VyC q✓ V L - q � l V C d p N d✓ u 6 V N 6W 9 � t N Y N O ✓✓ N ,p I I O L b N u .. c u - P L c r W N T d✓ qu d 6✓ V T y L V> 0 O G q q � O s w Z T� V L L ne c O' ycy � V � o.- F N d N L N V PI 11 6 Ell 1 O z a 0 L a 0 4.1 v u C N a d 0 d qY• a� S N dO aqr d v c q C L C d E E d L q vv Po c c z= O ^ d r L O r ` O d ✓ L C �I P� C c�¢o` L V 000 6y U q Y✓ V L j PW e c vL qa� q r C u ^ C p Cryn V 9 v N � y� E p orry a — C S q — T C Q V U O N q V ¢. L V Iq V9 O q 1C 6^ L T L P d < `" c r q y < N L U —U ye = 01 +rV LC O V O C r c 0 v. OIL L = d _ �4d �o QT N C er u o N o Z O V P ' q Cyr L C L 6 C y U O y a q J Pg v c _ dd L O U ✓ G � y ^_ C u O 09 CL — C � 0 J V L O C O < C a L 0 e r L N d V P C C P iW — y O V OEs PI �1 O r O L e ✓_ C L Y v d V SNq T< � A O d a y c v ^ N C n a < C o $. t1 G J � S y C S � o r < L O. L C N•— w p T= vq ` V V v q y PW j q N t r p y <Y O. M•9 cr U P C P L C C C y � � O i L C P N L C� d u Y °v rn O v N O V ✓ S C 5% V O a � q _ d � N N 9 q ^ J i � < V C L N ^ P d 8 u q o ^ T V L N .CpU N � � d 1 � M C0 L N � CWW V ✓ ♦ Y L V ^ eke a° N f'1 f I NI I V P T r � r p r V �C P ^ C C '¢ V >� `o Cu G C C K ^ C i q r— L C ` V W V C Y V p C J d < c L.. d � _ C — V N 1p a u a o t r V L — OS ^ V^ V C 9 O 9 �_✓7 �1 N -ate L d ua O — < Y 9 O. NEe — ' L � S qg O d O q L > V `oa uc" r 7 ✓ N <� O✓ V ` V C > n r L q N O � ' 9 a < C V E v Y 1 w D. M� 9 U! r l < Q C C — '¢ V C l ry O i < u� �I s O_ r r« r' d 0 L L c � C O Lo c P L V d V L a � e 0O• w T gG 4 F ` — V V y t C 0 V to NI h E 11 El CITE' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 12, 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission I FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner I $Y• Curt Johnston, Associate Planner i SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84 -49 - GENERAL DYNAMIC - A development of a 240,000 square foot I office building and approval of a conceptual master plan with two additional buildings, totaling 540,000 square feet, on approximately 75 acres of land in the General Industrial Category (Subardoa 11), and Industrial Park Category (subarea 12), located between 4th Street and 6 ±h Street, west of Cleveland Avenue - APN 210 -081- 8,9,10,11,12. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Re uested: Approval, of a Master Plan, Phase I Site Pan, Architectural Design, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. S. Purpose: Co ^struction of a 240,000 square foot office building. C. Location: - Located between 4th and 6th Street, west side J Cleveland Avenue. 0. Parcel Slze: - Five p ?reels totaling approximately 75 acres. E. Existin Zorn - General Industrial Category subarea 1 , Industrial Park Category (subarea 12) F. Existing Land Use: - Existing building roughly 250,000 square feet on approximately 20 acres, remainder of site is a vineyard. G. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Coca -Cola Distribution Facility, zoned Industrial Park (Subarea 6), vacant /vineyards, zoned General Industrial (Subarea 11). ITal 0 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 84 -49 - General Dynamics December 12, 1984 Page 2 South - Chevron Land Development Company, Industrial Park (City of Ontario, previously Ontario Speedway site) East - Vacant /vineyards, zoned Industrial Park (Subarea 12) and General Industrial (Subarea West - vacant /vineyards zoned Industrial Park Category (Subarea 5) and Haven Avenue Overlay District H. General Plan Designations: Project Site - industrial Park and General Industrial, North - Industrial Park and General Industrial Suuth - industrial Park, City of Ontario East - Industrial Park and General Industrial West - Industrial Park Site Characteristics: The site slopes to th- south at approximately Of the 75 acres, approximately 20 acres is developed with an exiting manufacturing building. The remainder of the site is maintained as a vineyard with no significant natural vegetation. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: As indicated on the attached exhibits, the overall development includes two 3 -sto ^y 240,000 square foot office buildings and a 300,000 square foot manufacturing /warehouse buildings. The first phase of development under consideration at this time includes the easterly office building facing Cleveland Avenue. Also, to be constructed in the immediate future, is a electronic field measurement area with two small block buildings :ess than 1000 square feet in size to be located at the northeast corner of the project. B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee reconmends approval of the conceptual Master Plan and, Site Plan for Phase I, and architectural elevations for the proposed office building. The Committee reviewed all aspects of the project, including site planning, grading, landscaping , and architecture of the proposed and existing buildings. Tne Committee recommends approval with the following recomreendations: C.- cD6, 11 11 IL PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 84-49 - General Dynamics December 12, 1984 Page 3 1. Ute contour grading practices to eliminate hard cut and fill edges and create a more natural slope appearance, particularly adjacent to the office buildings; 2. Revise slope configur,itions to provide greater visabi;ity of landscaping with moundings in front of graded slopes; 3. With the first Phase of the project, de,.,elop the employee lunch area on the south side of the office building; a.. The 4th Street streetscape and entrance statement to the existing building should be upgraded and emphasized to reflect the "special boulevard" character of the street. C. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project and determined that, with the recommended conditions of approval, the project is consistent with all applicable standards and ordinances. D. Grading Committee: The Grading Committee reviewed and approved the conceptual grading plan subject to a number of conditions necessary to meet City Standards including submittal of a final grading plar prior to issuance of building permits. �. r- -,4- vim ?i�tul r�.$ -e= nt• Part I nF ti.` Initial C4�dy has been completed by the+ applicant. Staff has completed the environmental checklist and found no significant adverse environmental impacts as a result of this project. If the Commission concurs with these findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the Industrial Area Specific Plan and the General Plan. The proposed use, building design, master plan, and site plan, together with the recommended Conditions of Approval is in compliance with all applicable City Standards. In addition, the project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties, or cause significant adverse environmental impacts. Q -3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT OR 84 -49 - General Dynamics December 12, 1984 Page 4 IY. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission concur with the Facts for Findings and Conditions of Approval through adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration. lly A4bmmmitted, RickjGomez City Planner iRG:CJ:cv Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "8" - Existing Site Conditions Exhibit "C" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "E" - Grading Plan Exhibit "F" - Architectural Elevations 0-Y I] u .. ......•..... ZE aE zFi .,,,fig' •� `� � • 1 ' -- --------------- ui U.1 Z co LU WA 00 ;ik t. El I A.: Y� © -.o-/ r� 1 1 � 1 1� 0 iz low RICO z LLI 11�` ry � LU kit wrI �A i O I A.: Y� © -.o-/ r� 1 1 � 1 1� 0 iz low RICO z LLI 11�` ry � LU kit wrI �A Ll 3. C � .. ,1..•.10• � • --- . or •oJ<o o c, 1 0 1 ,-"ate .S ••'4.1 J o _ �_. • IL7 O O c r.. • .id �i J o v a • /qN O a I } c u C 7 O w.. `..tea.. --- R 179 _.;_.,L �... �', �l --Psu C^Z, 1 � +`1�.•.f•.`- .— •.J'- .A�r�' h�: + _�'�.. \ ` ;roJ'�'F=o- ��fi -1 11.E co a p •J ., 1_ - - = J f"�.i i •ta `� ma c� n f � � - I I � I�Yp \`i V c o ` - - i c p u ., •. .i J _ o o il' I c e a a c` Z I g9 t a = { p c a o c � � I .13' Z •� \V RO••o7�albal Ilbb ^uZb i'- 'ISt Y _� CITY OF RANCF.O CUCAMONGA PART II — INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DATE:_ f /'S 1R85I K LL1L 11: ,TL- FILING DATE: �4T ,9 /9BSi LOG NUMBER: Z.C& PROJECT• Zoo, c�ct-, � �� t� -f- .c�.'�S7z7C iL.6j✓ PROJECT LOCATION:__p,�' I. EN"IRONMENTAL I?i?ACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets). YES MAYBE NO 1. Soils and Geology. Will the proposal have significant results in: do a. Uns-,=ble ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? G b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or burial of the soil? L c. Change in topography or ground surface contour intervals? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any potential increase in wind or water erosion of soils, affecting either on or off site conditcns? C f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud— slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? G h. 1n increase in the rate of extraction and /or use of any miul -ral resource? 2. Hydrology. Will the proposal have significant results in: u C I 11 Page 2 YES MAYBE NG a. Changes In currents, or the course of direction of flowing stresms, rivers, or ephemeral stream channels? _ b. Changes is absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the race and amount of surface water runoff? C. Alteratiors to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any body of water? e. Discharge into surface waters, or any alteration of surface water quality? f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? g. Change in the quantity of groundwaters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interference with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? h. The reduction in the amount of water orher- wise available for public water sup ?lies? 1. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or seiches? 3. Air Quality. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile or indirect sources? Stationary sources? b. Deteriorati(.n :)f ambient air quality and /or interference gith the attainment of applicable air quality standards? c. Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? 4. Biota Flora. Will the proposal have significant results in: G z M G G G L� G a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or number / of any species of plants? _. C b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? O -1,.3 Page 3 YES MAYBE NO c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of plants into an area? d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural production?. Fauna. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristi =s of species, inrliri inv T.i vnrci ry .ii c,riY...♦i.... ...t....,. of any species of animals? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered sper.jas of animals? i G c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or wildlife habitat? 5. Population. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, diversity, or growth rep- rf / the human population of an area? b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? / _ 6. Socio- Economic Factors. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in local or regional Socio- economic characteristics, including economic or commercial diversity, tax rate, and property values? b. Will project costs be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax payers or project users? _ 7. Land Use and Planning Considerations. Will the proposal have significant results in? a. A substantial alteration of the prasent or L planned land use of an area? b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, policies, or adopted plans of any governmental entities? c. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of misting consumptive or non- cos.sumptive recreational opportunities? Page 4 YES P'A :iBE NO 8. Transportation. Will the pioposai havr significant r "ulta Ya: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? -- •— b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for / new street construction? C• LZICCL3 vn cal-Ling y3S Ut31S facilities, or demand for new parking? _ 0-/S d. Substantial impact upon existing transporta- tion systems? t e. Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of people ani!or goods? _ f. alterations to or effects on present and potential water- borne, rail, mass transit or air tr- .ffic? g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, / bicyclists or pedestrians? ® 9. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, paleontological. and!os historical resources? _ 10. Safety, and Nuisanco: Factors. will the _Aealth, proposal have significant results in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health / hazard? C b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous / substances in ,he e-rent of an accident? — d. An increase in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such / organises? — e. Increase in existing noise levels? f. Exposure of people to potential :y dangerous / noise levels? is / g. The creation of objectionable odors? h. An increase in light or BL--re? le 0-/S YES MAYBE NO 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. The obstruction vista or view? b. The creation of site? c. A, conflict with Cr Mrent4 el c or degradation ;f any scenic an aesthetically offensive the objective of designated 12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal cave a significant need for new system-- or alterations to the following: Page 5 a. Electric power? b. Natural or packaged gas? / C. Comtn:nications systems? d. Water supply? e. ti:astaaater facilities? £. Flood control structures? g. Solid waste facilities? h. Fire protection? i. Poli =e protection? ;. Schools: k. Parks or other recreational facilities? 1. Yairtenance of public facilities, including roads and flood control facilities? / _ m. Otber governmental services? 13. Enezgg and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upo- cxi�'ing sources of energy? c. An increase in the demand for development of new sources of energy? d. An increase or perpetus':cn of the consumption of non - renewable forms of energy_ when feasible renewable sources of energy are available? LI r' L'J V Page 6 YES hAYBE NO e. Ssbstazaal-depletion of any nourenevable or scarce natural resource? _ 14. Mandatory Findings of Sigri.£icazce. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop l.ol.a -. cu] F m�afai.±a no 7 avnl ¢. rhrearen to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rsre or tadangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? _ b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short -term, to the disadvantage of long -term, environmental goals? (A short -term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a - elatively brief, definitive period of time while 10129- term impacts will endure well'- into the future). c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, / and probable future projects). d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? iI. DI` iTSSION OF MMIRON2'£NTAL EVAiIIA2T -ON (i.e., of affirmative answers to the above questions plus a discussion of proposei mitigation measures). Q-/7 III. DETERKMTION on the basis ,f this initial rraluatione I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATM DECLARATION will be prepared. _ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on tine environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATIC:N WILL BE PREPARED. find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the envirnment, and an ENVIRMHEN''T 1.OACT REPORT is required. Date (� £. Cl�xgnature Title co _�� y Page 7 E RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 84 -49 LOCATED BETWEEN 41*i-; STREET AND 6TH STREET, WEST SIDE OF CLEVELAND AVENUE IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK CATEGORY (SUBAREA 12) AND GENERAL INDUSTRIAL CATEGORY (SUBAREA 11) DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 19th day of October, 1984, a complete application was filed by General Dynamics Corporation for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 12th day of December, 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above - described project. follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as SECTION 1: That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the enviro:uaent and that a Negative Declaration is issued on December, 12, 1984. SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 84 -49 is approved subject to the following conditions and attached Standard Conditions: 11 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION December 12, 1984 Page #2 PLANNING DIVISION 1. Contour grading practices shall be used to reduce hard cut and fill edges and create a more natural slope appearance, particularly adjacent to the office buildings. In addition, crone rnnfinnratinne me el.nti 3. ^. tti` conceptual gracing plan shall be revised to provide greater visibility of landscaping with mounding in front of graded slopes. Approp irte details shall be indicated on the final grading plan prior to issuance of building permits. 2. The employee plaza on the south side of the Cleveland Avenue office building shall bp developed with the first phase of the project. Construction details shall be provided with the landscape and irrigation plans, reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. 3. The existing building, particularly the south elevation, and the 4th Street entrance statement shall be upgraded and emphasized to reflect the "Special Boulevard" character of the street prior to completion of the overall planned development program. 4. A detailed site plan delineating phase one improvements shall be submitted with the construction drawings for review and approval by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. ENGINEERING DIVISION 1. A lot line adjustment /merger to remove lot lines through buildings and resulting in a maximum of two lots within the site is required prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. The design of Utica Street shall consider the drainage passing under 6th Street from the area to the north. 3. The intersections of Utica Street with both 4th and 6th Streets shall be designed to provide for adequate vehicle turning movements and the acceptance/ removal of drainage flows. 4. Notice of I:otention to join the proposed median island landscape aistrict shall be filed with the City Council, prior to occupancy. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LJ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION December 12, 1984 Page f3 Ll BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman 11TTCCT. Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and reg-larly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Conmission held or. the 12th day of December, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: 0 -a/ r r, O Z Y [J d O d � r� 0 VTJ c +i Cr�C� NrJV ^P �VV 7C•� gCOq q- q q = C O N L r g C C y YEN O�Vr $ r O p � q LL D> C y u 9 L N d r r j E y O Vpvp O -6 PY � .a y E myr 9 J na `on p -u� o .b.`ws co �G�of q O or ' v qrS r Nr b _ OVyr,ri ^p yn ¢CVgv _4L r tY�d V r O Y q V pp N = N q ru` 6 ; ` O G` q) r D � g T O C 6 G y C � 'V•r pL L O y kq p `¢ � v C y�riJOWO O •J .r0 t N 4` g O Q C O q u N C� q •Vn p P V u r r- � S Yy = N u N f u C 9 G r C q V y q g CL q_N ,°. Ea:VU OL VV� >P LV� d v dC V� ryN•ij'` r 6Ly V` L.p rCN =p ¢O 6ad,) r b C��grNCC•O.. C lG -V CV Oi rbC I TO Oy. 's yE N e N p c PO` O y� •Jn .O. • s cr. c o C'SL Cq JyTr +d0 gC9Lt r- Gu iP •J�yr `6'C90>. C Efi�q ld rG Pp h C?M Vp C CygVO Curr- JE9,w q OLZD�Vr �fiO dL• 7 ..0 q9 pOOVV 9C6 VV V_ 2=9 5� B qud _O +9Lr r •.i { J' N r C� r O C N �_ a _Vr N .� N r _C�V N Q O C O r N • - -r a 0... _O E6 lq_ `J_ >~Ow y0 pn `N Nq0 -7'> PO'7 L OG�i. c- � G g N T O � r •CC• q C d C r C � D• E g� � = q •w G _� Jr�N r9v�G r N_ .�gV.Jr qpN tO�Or P T� 6C�Cp,� p p V ��? �_ � O• T_J 6. Pr � L C � N ^ l e . y C 0 � OQJr��� i0u�_ b.` LI¢d�•V+ pq> _ VY•�V•r WFC q 9Q >Q _V E G>.��L riU� y�G 9i 0-99¢ L rOOruN q0 L.NGCOgr q -q0 .r.•��r Vp E i•-b <= vVaC VrrCC'�� =c'cJ pOC 6�OCTV yVy dc6 TAE, i V V r � r= u:, CC A. b�Od V H> q� C' C 4 -.2- C> d E r- d_ _ 9 d C P O q •.• O _ 9 N = N- V > N •J �'� i T � U �r '..''� Pc `>r•^ - -� V� N (� > Cd -_iJ V+ p+ NN rV _T E �- V9p7SriTj� O •�OU.•J.rr �U� CC 6•- +�p.L.� pO �L •.LO4m tOLV 6U <96L6 VC 0 G ~ O O a a V C O S s Z N C c c _! S V y m N� < O I p> `pp 9 0 CO O u e: yxY L r c: :L W F s V V �I CI 6� c u i F •. N H S t O u - J O 6 - � o +u -cy �g P N ' fro c n = N ¢ O. J q r O � d p9 i L V r C O ¢ •V.. O y d V M Nr d _ L � N Q qv Y L V � E jy q& M yG Iz P S � =e E =' r E Jy F H E >I d c y - duP ✓LL o vast o0 �r pn • -u V.d.. •`r .D 6q.L.. .a 'iENtO,`b�Ta+ M� q O O• N FV 9 V � Gy -06¢i •n � V V O u •..r J V O C ' V f C VL � y�riJOWO O •J .r0 t N 4` g O Q C O S 6 _ _ O > �' � EriVOi CL O O OO Oy. 's PO` O e cr. c o S q CV- N CC Td L Pi Tr >� .r -r C- P O O L ^_d L•r LV9 V Ll ¢ VYp G V O L G V y U C 6 q Y Y V 1 C -y P V• r 6 y r I` C C d O L G G L N QC 01 tOt J . r L r- ° aOtiOZ V0 c_ r 1 -LNN• .Ne = ✓Jr"o > V O «� �_�° a— wMq L'•= gacq • V d Y O L N �'� •w •� � V` a N - G r •. ka-.o S M'r L O� N � Eby J e � O G •p•pyy O » P O o 0.` ��u T9 06G l° V P N `'r_ C L 9 qC e qNi •Oi•6 V C b rqv ° iQ'r� �0•� � O °YVM�wM NVO PdgQ�r LY °T6tiYCr.L Nrq LdO -Or >� Z ...CUV ti•Vr• =`�OOJ AOV SCC NY Lr_ r vN >_- _r.LG C� O� • r J Y G iC: rC L T T T w d l - '•' O d� OE6 N C w S .jam � C�= l V �CCTC'�' V p LY 6N Urq VZ` j JN uN L L —.2 6wJV t CPVa 2>•�VLV ATV H j °6 V c d pO�_ V O >Vr 6 - r r p = CL. n_ Y�L l• bcOC GtC L -F V T N l✓ N C O VCO V•r r_U r C Q �> d N C • G� � V L � y O - -O w G N c pV N> S y L N�u •� V -O •0 Pr° M V yV .i rc w 9 �G N< 4- SS'c -`o^ �rE -O O- ._w:. =__ O e c_os L b Y- GCry "� Q V = L L � N W ' Y �. C" rJ S i Gy W O = .t..• b P - C d y- P C J O r O G rc Y S O. rO gr v ✓r P 09 aVi -• N- -V O ^ V C S N q N g t q G G R• G _ Z '. = rl y N S Y C L L �N S Ei0 .nLA V Mwd9e� °a q= '• a.+ �^ry_LO� V°VV Mj yVVGNO���V >MLT O{L l E ayr C - -V.M G .'..• P e VC b y= Y L Op V J .. S �� ^ O.r pY C V G V V G° Y r p V O° V L. y r O ✓ -V G J G W °) Z G O V� .8 S w d q• O q Y = VL•n�V •w N lL P -•� v�.Y• y d VP�_C..•b�J C i Vq. C _9 � S J O u O r d J O V r V C> r" C• ^ L Q r d L ..• L= V O• 9 '� V °p T w v r S_ e d V L V�W i c -�z ir= , c <G ZP Z ONN_r 'L••L ` V t o u ° y u - C M JCr = c L S ri eO a _.q�vRR L P G•� rL.sV N Z r N V - w O. ... 6 C i � OG O q V ^ p=- C JV r = -S V-VJ ON S V CQwQur LE.V - le V ✓ i L_ T O 4 6 u 6 G C `_ t_ N •a O N r-. ey P N c c C` C O O L i �C VON r V a > N� C O.OV Y O- Z w p .rC6 •Ji• •T• VV �' � .LI, •J+ f V O• WC Z N °` 4 L{�� <�GV 6�•Ji�O Q•Orm <�wV•C NR� f.Y ��C ��wY p-^ ��i MC9 ��O <wG <Vi.6� r N G L- 8 QC 1D •Oi= tOt UO ° aOtiOZ V0 c_ r C L o_ Er• • V d a w l N 6� •w •� � V` a N - G r •. ka-.o � � r N � r c p- V a L€ L Iy. -° i g r s L t o C �-',� 0 J •!, N WY yEC ° •0W �On NVO Vi d. °T6tiYCr.L Nrq CCG CJi -q tNi -i• AOV Lrq -» rV`rC CJ=N Nd� N� t-'r V90 iC: rC .b.. T _ -G ru•�T °r =� >NyC Nv -Cr 60 Y w�VM .jam PL T� NVT�� V �CCTC'�' MLa tr0 cEy i t V 0. H j °6 V c V G C C 0. C a! r 6 - r r p J D r > a ✓ 4 C` w •Oi N r P 6 w C M 6 L V T N l✓ N C O l G C C' r C Q �> d N C • G� � V L � y O - ✓ N c G E J O. C° i 9 u : T y O i y V O ✓�� r C V L 9 VL_ w S V = SyJ V S Y �. C" rJ S i Gy W w .t..• S V C d y- P C J O r O G rc O Mj d >MLT O{L l qG P G ayr C - -V.M VV_G 9 S •-i� q r V J .. L V a.- -Z=.5 w am C ^ > ✓ -V •O ^La v�.Y• dY ^� !V�= ijE i Vq. C -JGLVy VQq Sr T �PO.0 CCN�9� P 9 {i V •r •- fOiL P w v r S_ e d V L V�W yy. ONN_r 'L••L ` V t n` JCr = .N� r° �T 0.T G O C O 9^ a w C p Gy' V ✓ i L_ T O pp C Z• C N N ey P N c c y Y l L O L ` tY•O_ °CPrY 7 g VON r V a > N� C O.OV Y C- P. CI Z w p .rC6 L� ° P 1> ►LwO ° Y Q t- N °` 4 L{�� p O Y M <�wV•C NR� f.Y ��C ��wY p-^ ��i MC9 ��O <wG <Vi.6� Ll V L l OC9�y u y C 'jj��� 7 —LT C C 6 d r V V O.r rA l 7 £ V d N C > e 9 a ^ D n ,S qO i{VD T C ¢ a0 Cd•. L y 9 L � �p L' C V P = •Gi. �` q V u D 'J V Y P y y 'COL e � G .y 4�9 T 6N6 4 P9VYN• �r`WC Pd n Oy�[.f .0.. d rVW` S t a 0` `• r C rd r �'T r G' N� V •.V.VLp V °�.L.r V y N V C J y n L v L� V >. 'n O � 9 O. W ` ^ •Vn = d aV � �� Ll�> ^v0•eL 6' =�Ppw P= °q "a N `„ �r^ V r9 •n d 9 n drV CL N _ T� G = Nr _ L rJ .� q >e— L.a P €r. yP L 9 Q Vy2 Niq Tr == CL ° M V^ q 9 a V �• 9 9 -.2-, P C nLCq p y C r �"� J L y — u n C ✓ .� dP.in. N J L r C _ r V?= C�qA E t V 9 Y _yd L 9 •w L^ CV d9 JP.wL <rn� _ L C 'a Er � G u 1 G 9 O x 9 d L L 0•� T� G V� t`i O i" C 9 •°r � 9 t ndr +I 49 0O ��_0..� I . Ly'QiS dQP rO VLO CO �o d sL H N 'S r V ti a P r P U 6 y O � 'LC _ T Q d69._ V LV E C _ ._^ 9c 9.r MV v T9G � P � =add OC.L..9 dv�.__ � vrro v"•+a °'°'°sue ,an OL G N 9 q Gl C N V O N O N 7 d .Ge N g T CT d L S �• .w T.• � V_ � e V` U r d O 6 C C= .' 'J .. 1 6v C= 9� il! _ V 9 N V _ C � � N V C = 2 V •_ S C U ^ NNN �A s� .1_ T n.O..r C�r�P }^' � 9.J .•O. N ^O7: •.. q.rd n`S 6N SNdV G9 —U6 WO d:E O M « «.• n .S 6N AND V.D..r N rL �- O 46 6N V Q G = 6 P N V 7 9 O— L 6 '• 9 O g G 6 V < V r O M C p� M L � n 7 i 9 v t w e r— V r N ro � COi11 1iJ V N O n 2 N O N N � N^ S NO L• NZ \�v N V. Ll V� a ^J VL .r PTV O� C C 6 d r V V O.r rA l L7N e N 2 G .y LYn V 6 L O = 6N6 4 LK N n A V C Pd n .0.. S t a 0` `• C rd �'T r O —O TU AE« •.V.VLp S� V a L _L 'n dN c O qi -- �� Ll�> ^v0•eL 6' =�Ppw P= °q "a N `„ �r^ V °.•d N`d' o. N« 4�` —° q >e— L.a P €r. yP `oq 9 t ndr +I 49 0O ��_0..� eLOA Ly'QiS VQ=a, rO VLO CO A r V O C O a P r P U C. q Gl C N d d 9 = n`S r rLr L O M « «.• n d 1 V A d C N V d N W V Q G = 6 P N V 7 6 C Yri n.ISi 6 V < V r O M C p� M L � n 7 i 9 v t w e r— V r N ro � COi11 1iJ V N O n 2 N O N N � N^ S NO L• NZ � � I I f' L� �1 ✓I '1 � •I � D 1 Ll E c' ^° c q P -mac c- p�L� mP od ca LP a dPd >. q rNd ct q `c c tau C a N' O L_ ✓ pb- G G OI VdLV nN TI �L C� `>g WiY .Y• C O C�� � - N W p l O y N d q a✓ r N G O � i. q .-.. `g.wa �{ L C. V°- PO.rE V C •°v ?1 a re - a.c c- -£ q 2V�-• C Vr y =7C � LV -r L OdG d ✓J -'n r= 6Vgr aCSS �Or G p�✓� y Gr"Jr9 q L` q . Nr - .-- V -Pd V aV O - =a 2` N 6--� J G V 1 C •_ -° V O° N _� rC r> r O l <I q q L a° N -° V S L� s v N � N �' '^ °,r d N O. p✓ i�C _ q J - O C V O q N y N 61 C i a r q j V O O C PF -L NI ✓VI1 7 -.•�•� L•NrO qN ✓ NT- •Nn =NP >qC Cl ` 'JV°-.Vq O� 6Jna1r ✓1 OL q�O N rl 6VG W.°v0 WVV 'J6 C9L ny tr NI ai JII oil "c rd 4 2 -q oyo dLN d -o` •I VV �rG � d __ _4 � r0� yOCO >• V ` C r '-� q C •1 4 C � N C> 1 �J C L �c •°n r C O N j 0 � � V V= �� y� V O •CO p G` O CS °w -�' � {1. � n _N LIEFN �q a C= Oe =�rN �y O O V6' Vq ` I'= IV �jG•rY ✓.+✓ G0 6N L .d..M O O• a e> C > P C C I '� a Z n C 2✓ V V _° C p O M q -. C° e n ✓� ✓ V C N q` r { V C O O J .r N = r p m te= j I g y. r d N __ O __ •^ 6 V V 2 'n d S C ' V O t r Q V V ! N N 7 q L I � r - b �_ i t 6 0� E p ✓` L V J q � •• C N C n q •J r q C N C C N= r O 6 1L q L` -_ V M� ` O` L ' > P L C V l b � •'J � A N® V V r L VV VGa °✓ aNO OgC I?L o `cam -LO moo: nl i ° € =L.p. L i o'Cg -j Le � L✓ +V � >. V O4L E � - _ -`V� L n m O r V �i I g V 9 V =d �N- V V C y 2� rQ V 9 C ✓ 6 1 1 6 S L 9 V E 1r 1 O 2 L� 7 O i O• 11 Lj E w C ° MOa� dN � qv p• � aN C p\ ° I M I V L "• u u y" Dr� .� I U 7 �= L •Lr• a C P l V P w Y' h Cy p j > C p�� u •°• T L A � (� q O p• q j V I q = = _ f $Ei _ � s °w� .•• n � g a°, M d .� C= •' I O O I l C V 9� U 6= O � ` O i .O n O tJ r d ` w¢ p L Y L m � a �• C 1uL1 d ay • r ,••1 spa° �- 1 � � N L-' c c.. >,° :+ c � o _ .ten _ ry =_ ,1,•e L c c E c n Vp d�`o v Vu p L �¢ N•!QL _e• c cn — I @p pC} ° ALO Yr°e .•s`.• G01 �� p 0 0 0 T 1 = L� .0 S �'jj V> E° r° a L O E q A 4 � I c._. ¢M_ �•i �g °.. __ii ?:r p 6 L I N Vii° S O `� E G g jK� d OI� C i d T V G Oq L C C 1C �� 8a y. I I NG9dE d l¢�°1� l I Y y N N t C •Ln •. I • J d a � I I 'J — N y y V g C r O° � C� �� < N •Ln I•J � P _ _P _ L p t '__ i ��.• �4 _.. _gyVe c`¢ �•^ r� dl &j NlJNYM =r 7 � O 6• r 6 L n 6 •J L u T I j g q N¢ < L C y M1 p ¢ V q � � O O C u L g N L � r i q • N L u L r � O N p ' CC L V T= L C •.r O' d 3 i C r L N° �� `� ¢ G Lq�= Ln Pq dp� d¢l Fi¢ ywC dNdm >•G P V C� V v¢ d b A T �• L L L 6 O rPC �! 4 O o G L ]••� .• G r V �•°w N �r 7r NO �L rGiY p.� �(r'/QG� n Lu_r nrnayy m` eo p 4 c.. G� O� ' •`] O� ` � O C q 1` L CO > C U O q °' � � C� q � L �d Cc CqL OO C��rLO rV ¢ V ` �•rrr �� P M1 C� C> V LNC� C 1q r N L N L O L O f. ` � � O � O •] V VbN° °qrr� C O° = 660 _9E •��jq•Oi••.r � O�_ ° P� �° = q� C° P ° G y d C Y � •' L d ° t U Cy C` d GC •'• N r q rLV � FOd °L Cty L •L.r G •r G `Vrd q V �¢ p 6 V VNY N •^dVq E y� ' -y ON7 y N •+ C E S Ni O rO LC $, 6Oq OA y4 °4.q.0 Aq O�t'l0 6 i 0 fin( -6 O 1 O>• N.V.• .6 CO SC - N]� VAC a__G]1 C..v ¢q 0•^ LtJ NI Or! P. j n0•'n — r J C1 J NLN N� •di.0 qP 1•Nr• Vf Ld p N > O v VC P • Vyy CVN O-°• gPPS OOy •L'•.. r0 S rLO >•VyyC L-OO � Vr y0• PC .1. q =( O _ =� P C I �S O? �= � Jgdq•n 6�q� ON°•f.00 O1 y =~p rL� dI N C f O ^� W u xi t 0�6a. 11 Lj E �i ;I yJ V QJ -n 0 i d El El C C c c C G c E '1 u C C L_ C L � r r anUO T r ♦ O. V�C� �� V _ c C N Z V i S L Ju `l 7 � V 1.J 6 x QnS rty rj C I rEY x"'v �G d 9 u y L N •n � � <�� � N 4_c Jly C•- � T CC . V = = = ctv �V nO rC• O W j �� -r � ^� �Q -q isO l6 q V • L . - c i. r D_ r N r = N v i d \ Q r V> � t O N j C E .G. G 9- O d 4 i = C' M d ,_ •e C r Y r d C ¢ r C r d P DL • N Dn� cL\E\ cr aErJ _ X` aci "'_' mr tYI do v P� C�. L Vr pVd rC EQ V VL6 P i p- tL >L >. L � O L.. 6 V d, C q v n -a7 L�r CV 6_ VrN V O Iz n �y C I t I C C c c C G c E '1 u C C L_ C L � r r anUO T r ♦ O. V�C� �� V _ N Z V i S L Ju `l 7 � V 1.J 6 N A Cr\- L_ � r r anUO T r ♦ O. V�C� �� CC . V = = = C 4 O C �L' j C E .G. G 9- O 1R� 4 i = C' M d •e C r Y V r C r C_t0 rC VL6 P i "GC tL y >. L N 6 V d, C -a7 A El 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DAT°_: December 12, 1584 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Curt Johnston, Associate Planner SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACTS 12238 AND 12530 - C TAT UN BUILDERS - he deve opment of 78 single family detached units oa 18.5 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2 -4 du /ac), located on the west side of Hellman Avenue, north of Church Street. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action ReouE:ted: Approval of elevations and site plan. B. Purpose: Construction of 78 single family dwellings. C. Location: 'North side of Church Street, west side of Hellman Avenue. D. Parcel Size: Recorded tract maps total, 18.5 acres. E. Existing Toning- ;nw Residential District (2 -4 du /ac). F. Existing Land Use: The subject tracts are currently under construction with grading for lots generally complete. G. Surroundinq Land Use and Zurin : Nort - xisting singe amz y homes, railroad track, vacant property, zoned Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac), and Medium Residential (8 -14 du /ac). South - Existing single family subdivision, zoned Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac). East - Junior High School znd existing single family subdivisions, zoned _„w Residential (2 -4 du /ac). West - Existing single family subdivision, zoned Low REsiJentiai (2 -4 du /ac). H. General Plan Desi nations: Project Site - l.ow P,esi6ential North - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac). South - Low Residential (2-4 -east - Low Residential (2 -4 West - Low Residential (2-4 (2.4 du /ac). du /ac), Medium Residential (8 -14 du /ac). du /ac). du /ac). ITEM P 0 1 O Z a-� V d d L d m C W r c r i .. n y >o qu b g'E P•J C e O C' c J Gr 4 r �L ✓ � L r C ba o� T V V — C O G q C V '✓S� 4 r_ y a O N y _ cra 4?�t I I ' I ;JG ibv 1' O C L a L O �DY7 1 U 1 ^ b r ✓ e 9 r C O L P � C p W r w �u b V of a: ! I C V 11_ j W i V M p C> C Cry 4 � E o �J y r u a e o.n c u = o Z - y C P . i • � l G Cr �7 _ P3 ors - I �— G C q C � GJI.C.a I O � C � C V P•�i j W � r _y c L r � r r ✓ L� ✓ E C 1^ a V - � C ✓4 C r a V _ 6 y jai b_Y q _ri q �i qW r ✓_' v r � � O _ C b` W O j L y r b •t.. o > o �� �`•' "Y _T =c L L `b'= = ion a o O 9y Y ✓O b'l � ... — U —U br_ C,�C 61 �• O ✓ t L r_ ✓ Vr Y"J1 ry U � y 4 0 qa CI — 6r PW � p 4 0 rb _ ' P' T O O + YZ z � b L � n � U CC 0 n E PLAANING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tracts 12238 and 12530 December 12, 1984 Page 2 1I. ANALYSIS: A. Genera As mentioned previously, these tracts are currently under construction. The tentative maps were approved under the previous zoning ordinance which permitted average lot sizes of approximately 7,200 square feet. No unit designs were approved with the tentative maa,,S- The applicant, Citation Builders, has proposed three floor plans wit; four architect) -al variations of each unit. The floor plans range in size from a three bedroom; 1,439 square foot unit, to a four bedroom, 1,707 square foot two -story unit. The roof material proposed on all uni;;s :s concrete tile. A neighborhood meeting was held in November to present the proposed plans to adjacent ?and owners, since no architectural elevations were approved �, ;th the tentative maps. Approximately a dozen homeowners attended the meeting and the general consensus was that the project would be a benefit to the neighborhood. B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee reviewed the project and discussed the architectural elevations and perimeter wall tretLient along Haven Avenue. In regards to the architectural elevations, the Cc_,mnittee recommended approval with the following conditions: 1. A tntal of four elevations (versus three, as proposed) shall be provided for each floor plan. 2. As per the original Conditions of Approval for Tract 12530, Lots 1, 2, and 3, which face difectly onto Heilman Avenue, shall be provided with hammerhead driveways, and access to Lot 4 shall be provided off of Pepper Street. The applicant has prov:ded the abova revisions as indicated in the Exhibits. Colored renderings of t' . elevations will be available for review at the Commission meeting. Perimeter Wail Design: A two- tiered perimeter wall, with insets approximately 0 feet or. center, is proposed along the west side of Hellman Avenue. The original wall design submitted with Tract 12238 nad a stucco finish with natural fieldstone rock pilasters at the insets. The Design Review Committee originally approved the configuration of the wall, but expressed concerns with the stucco finish because of maintenance preblems particularly for the lower wall adjacent to the s:dewalc. The condition of approval applied to Tract 12238 stated that "Construction techniques and choice of materials shall provide for low maintenance and long term attiactiveness.• In addition, the final design of the wall was to be submitted-to the Planning Division for final approval. P El E E 1p Ir PLANNING C"ISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tracts 12238 and 12530 Decent r 12, 1984 Page 3 Citation home; has now submitted a new wall design as shown on Exhibit "E ". The Design Renew Committee, however, felt that greate• var.axion in the wall design is desirable and re commended that the insets be increased from 10 feet wide to 30 feet wide, and the- the wine_ walls exterl 18" further into the planter. The insets should have a stucco finish with the remainder of the wail slump block. In addition, undulating mounding and landscaping should be provided up against the wall. The Commission shc.eld review the various options for the rerimeter wall and ---rvide the applicant and staff with the appropriate direction. Conditions of Approval based on the Design Review Committee's comments have been provided for your consideration. At the Design Review Committee meeting, the applicant suggested a third option similar to Exhibit "E -2" but without the stucco surface opt the insets. III. R ZOMMENDPTION• It is recommended that the Piann-4ng Commission consider all material and elements of this project. If the Commission M.1curs with the Design Review Comittee recommandations, approval of the elevations, site plan, and perimrcter wail through adoptior of. the attached Resolution would be appropriate. Resp Mful y s tied, %j Rick a0`. ' C'ty Plan •CJ:ns 1Attaciaments: Exhibit 'A= - Location Mali Exhibit 03" - TT 12238 Exhibit @C" - TT 12530 Exhibit "0" - Plot Plan Exhibit °E" - Perimeter hall Designs Exhibit "F" - Floor Plans & Elevations Resolution of Approval M wum • • 1 f 1 n ■ I � tM Y� � � � � r , /�'�V�' u\ /n / \ / saw � • n + Ilk, L , • � 1 • a.w�n sm�n J 1 r \ :1 1 n ♦ r a Y w e •f n � / sn•� r • � sar.� ' F 1 s � aee L n Q f Ib n 7on�ZSOI,� L f • �• j L v , • • w � j • + I L I 1! W ..d0 1t � w SI f ' � n.••• � I • ' t i , •I ,B a� r , f • �+ t • J; r a I e I + ; + � . � ; I • I yy► � uas wln + + �� . � � F i + 1 � I f � •+ �� i- I a w a L I 1 1 I w 1 4 • • NORTH <—T-2Z] , f 1 =L, Y OF rrEm: rr rzz-% & irzs30 RANCHO CUCANKO:�'C� �: wear -Fr_~ � PLAT IM, crVISM EXH1BiT: "R" SCALE-� `�� — 11 ary QF MAMMA,;@ M&W U COMM OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA tt xv . off i®Yif �1/ 1 +wuwr� / !Le•!P t • Y.��__ •�r1 4 r ��75'1'" _�.;..,� - V uamm• rseua�us �,.•,.,.. NOM ®' RANCHO CLCA "lMaNGA Pi. NNT%iG T)-VISi0i3 EXHIBrr- ' scxm --AM5. F- s • \ N'd1 ST00'E N�.0 ;' anmM 1 ; - - — y ` Mike � X10. •'f i � � 1 %.s'uia • Iii,-- -_ - -�- _ � �♦ � -�- lR1flll� . NORTH 'I. I CI iT'FAQ: ?izrs 1zZas lzs'Sc RAI CH' CUCkMI O GA Tom: �.. . 'T /Lpla® PI. dSTNING DIVIS N E:i-IMT. �G4 tE Z -b / .•i•���!!� r� 21 :c ~]��li��f:�� , �r 'Him- ULM Mrs ►tom i 41 t.._ n ■off ��� llio 7 • 4 _ ao. ({ r a Z. +. D. ` tf 1 I'1� ♦1 •. L f'il,: \ 1 'r t�a . a , r i! ..I1. l.1 it 1, M spr 1 I� ^ q 1 MIN, a a r i! l.1 it M 1 ^ q a I - jr -- y 1 ' - 1 Ell e4a tj I =,�- r i �-- T- a� iL IK sit I I z.l -a { L � b F` �• j� wz i i -- - • Iii ��:___ {`III � ;I art _ 7L MIR — =�•.t� �_� — � Vii® � — - - �.' -..� _ _ - 1 � 4 �Aa " w' s�.:ry_�v _.�•ca _.:. - -..:- � .. 3 ter. _.,� - ' — -:.w fir.. \�� is •�i'p �� .___- .- ��SV��. � _ •+..e 1 lli JSi ad 1 _ ✓_ i '}TSB Jai .1.. "�. .c ••• _ _ :1. :..r- - C _ t`{ tea+.`. —�'� •_ •� 10 1_ —III A i b M111- In FTJ JI I lz - L Ike -is I kl,�i I ^� i!6 il"`�c 'fie q]7-1 ai INA 1 14 Us it •� 3- 1 •- 71 _ -� � f iii 2'- ����� 4 �� `I�.�a",�s►` �iT m8 'a` � � � li 3M .�•. , � 3Dy Do • ti �� — .. �.-� -- --irk. - � 1 I,L` ! , �® 6 Ej• '_zZt �r� '' `�� 91� I i I ■ ` +t P � � Ll 7Mi. 1 b i I � ti i . I i 0 1 r t i F t: yf f -may • � � ,.. _� .. M5' CNI MEE It r tA vt1 9 vp I I A IA OF q I wclr� [10 ITI } -t if JE?l EllI! ' I 1 a vJ —7 3 t � v ! � � t ► yam: it • i � -- �� :: I 1 7 I � 2 11� I _ a IF� b :t at` d �l .. � 1• ��11I �� I�� � _ :i ooa cli MM :. c lit Z> I - - 7 a: �t Li C .. �L b. L � V 1 i EE i yyyyyy������rrrr .1 �a V ' � 1 N .a _ a IF� b :t at` d �l .. � 1• ��11I �� I�� � _ :i ooa cli MM :. c lit Z> I - - 7 a: �t Li C .. �L b. L � V 1 i EE i yyyyyy������rrrr .1 �a V ' � 1 N :J 44 IL % �t •�; :J � 1 ti., .. qx.. •.tea --.� l..fQ 1, t j l l� l 'I 1. +1. I 1�1 'F 1 A' f l IL, r IL % •�; 1 4 1. � 1 ti., .. qx.. •.tea --.� l..fQ 1, t j l l� l 'I 1. +1. I 1�1 'F 1 A' f l IL, I i. ij ViEl rl CD 1. zo INA 471t:.111"'1161; ilg C. CLI� fI z aa ;u Q:z zb. EF i� I r� I I� .' _ ..� .: .:• -...►i .3' �'. : '••awl.:' � -- •.:a•. ..,i Q .� UMMLI as 1 ° <LL - IL I r r. Ix t 12 i 11 k s LA i v� iL i, 4D G i 11 k s LA i v� ij UOLLVAL E� A 2oll VA rE 1 —ji --,AOL ILI En Ea 4i MVA� mmmmwmm� �•_. I _� %�_`sb�: III � .. ._ .__ .�� ^... -• f 11 f1 1 z s i C- 1. a` l EMVL,� ` E V P -a5 a F, - P -a5 a l` �i e IT vr F i ES ac II, v . -rl V a g AL a RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT N0. 12238 AND TRACT NO. SIDE LOCATED CH STR SIDE OF RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT RTH WHEREAS, on the 2nd day of November, 1984, a complete application was a...ilders °nr revipw of tl:e above- described project; and WHEREAS, on the 12th day of December, 198Y, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above- described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: Findings: 1. The design and layout of the proposed development, together with the Conditions of Approval, is consistent with the applicable elements of the City's General Plan. 2. the design and layout cf the proposed development will not unreasonably interfere with the use and future ® enjoyment of neighboring existing or developments, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. 3. The architectural design of the proposed develcpment is compatible with the character of the surrounding area and will create a harmonious, orderly and attractive development. 4. The design of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupai-tts and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture and color and will remain aesthetically appealing ind will retain a reasonable adequate level of maint°iance. S. That the proposed project is consistent wit., the objectives of the General Plan. 6. That the proposed use is in accord with to objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 7. applicable provision of the of Development Code. the IU � P�a� Resolution No. Page 2 AgIft 8. That the p•oposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfar, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That Design Review for Tracts 12238 and 12530 is approved subject to the following corid4itions and attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION: 1. All applicable conditions of approval for Tracts 12238 and 12530 shall apply to this approval. 2. The final design of the perimeter wall along Hellman Avenue shall be revised to increase the stucco finish insets from tai (10) feet to thirty (sQ) feet. Final construction drawings shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. 3. A final detailed site plan showing exact unit Am plotting and building setbacks in accordance with NW City standards shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to issuance of construction permits for each phase. 4. Street facing side elevations on all cornE, lots, and the rear of two story units facing Hellman Avenue shall be upgraded with additional wood trim, wood siding, or plant -ons. where appropriate. Construction details shall be indicated on the working drawings and reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. 5. As per the conditions of approval for Tract 12233, landscaping and irrigation shall be provided by the developer at the end of the temporary cul -de -sac on Eiger Way, and in the front yard of the flan, lot. number 30. Details shall be provided cn the landscape and irrigation submitted for reviews and approval prior to issuance of building permits. �' -aa II 11 c Resolution NG. Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12th DAY OF DECEMBER, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis j-. Stout, Chairman ATTEST' Rick Gomez, 9eputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoine Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the on the Rancho Decgembert IS84. by the followir�h otetoiw9tComonission held AYES: COMMISSYimER5: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: i -�9 0 wic mow✓ OeLiv1� °: -OK O Y P✓ ✓ � ro w O$O$.i O � +✓ it—:GL Q - -y� CG✓ Y_ar sGG Q Gy � w Q =r `pO aL G— 7y_T �C C a✓ �+ —L o�la��s°e, ✓L °.P, �O S d N Y M K a ♦C YS7 �� =Y r = ✓_ am _p r a 4 a a O ✓_ Ups YN V O M T V s rSa °adio O Y a Y✓ 6 O ✓ Y L 9— S y p G� 0 2✓ e O J r � d L a� O✓ O — Leer ✓a+. �Vr T✓ L ca C 00 > — r ✓ � LQ Q M p � d Y � � C ✓ L ✓ .py r a C r 1 O V T CO ✓� V ✓'nG c t �o r e o c r OCC � —tN�v— O G A G r a :S �Or —r0 CCC O ra o,a O p —w yy Lw — Q S T J e— T✓ S- O�J L a9aa 6a ✓ O V vz 6 a O V ✓„ P r O G � C• tl V o M V tl O S� F QC 6✓ J tM LIOV✓ +Cw �— 1 w a M L ✓— C�O1O� -I�OVC �<p l�yY d �yCi C P d V =�Y CC-16 r =`^ O l r�w0 VLp VO VGOrO C1 ry fir+ Yr� OP +�6 V� =r �O CV rO GG'O OS L�r CC °N p OYYVY C.i�q.�l b Oa V �bC IML P qQ L�� «u I O �..tv, rG jam/ yT g L e b ^VP^ C O � ��0/ yry~ dp0 OdYr 7� pp a��T J_V M LC ry. _TC rNC �C °ggO.0 °� w Cq °l'r. cra Or d d C O C` y@ r 6 =�p Z� ppw?r O nV ^ �� N N p Y. W.2� 66w r_L_ J S€ V L Y O d 2 q J r O 9e T.7C O « L - V b < W r C r g09 g r q O O p w .Lim Vt =ia64� w n _ ? = =pOOr V W p^ O a O« n Cy ^^ C V c u` Al. n —rye Yv e c � rdL �br arc «QC�r L.ci�o• Y o T ^r �� u�ar 6Pc S Y V�a�Q�r g O T M V n^ t YLr w nO VO. r�0 Q OCtr ��r 1^ •r O l i P O � P � i 9 + i T C ^ Y p ]1 tl N O Y 6 O ` � � � � (p/ L Y Y .� O a y D- � R r d�✓ g q n G C C 9 Y+ _ i y O L a a •j 9 a O y = L = O �qtl w FGOL M V � = O �Ctl d �•� '1 L ' �O�P S tl0'1 I9 T g O U ti O L Z =2t � t=Oi aY 9 p O "Y V Y 4 G •°O_ g N L f• O ` .• 9 C L V = Y O C L S 9 + p V T r O O ✓ a i Vr6 q6'9 OL Jy � Vya� yy = C CdL N.�LI O.Li• .' 9> a s _ Clf. Cy•'q JOOy r T d9 -iA- 'y ^ w�Y = C yV� =N • LrY O - i' C SOD 9 9 J + N VOG D� ✓�� N �_ Z' O aWi PPO C7 Dq Pq = > 9 -_V +Ly • dr V d vw Y y+ q 1 Crr T E r qN +cag'lu °'Om ° �•'L. °N ��— +_ V <' q d' V m "T''v .'. i e-p• �i� v +a L C nff `•r ;n'c O. 1 � C O✓ u L 7 • te L D l N w+ 0 . ✓ O V C n N� 4 C r y L� C M � Y� i C 6r q b�C LNV•O• Orl OyOT.. L C yd9C dq�OLT� Paa rOr� °_O Cr NO VO i V_Y v ID TOL O O r P j rLVq rCS i0 Na✓ _ Or. CGgOC q C _ NI 9 O _� VO?`i r•°.SL 9 l' yw O n q` =CVY • =•[C '` r w °T- r � r 6 y G S.• E�` aTi N 9 G 29�' O+ tOyTO =�p nr -JUq r0 aPp�r YVV d y O"9+ �a C° C +OrO N N N _ r N O N d> n C O y N W L q r✓ N O V =� W q VC L a m�CP �C6 O am +°9 Yart O D O L a O O O qt Cr C O O; qL = O C C F q r O6 C�OLr rCdy 7p TL OA N ��' N 0= ✓yn= dC0 O� .. O Cd 'r NT ✓� °1 .0. .� C� MC V ✓- Cr Fr Or qd rD DOJO P =+ L OS Y O N O p d C =�j N P a i>• L`C y y✓ a t O _ O y - Nr9 r O N ;.E ✓ qy 9 � T O D_N N O- ..r it _ V �� VC Y VL wN09 r> OOCIO�C qd N Vr O N •` >C . _S • +N V r b .°. � O n r r O J V 1't P w V r y N c y� a •+ LscNr a .n •Y-M� = — ° a EE � t:9 u Y— q t^ N e � a w a• Se onn.'. `"qrY y �' o qL � 'i �..' Or - 1w V� � Geq✓ `yN -6DL OV+ dx n -= nn D ° {.I �= O€ Ca � 9 •w 1 C C O Y .°r tlL�NVV ^ � C = I� w G MOO O p C +rL PO +E PC SL yr VI y O e�ao L =9 M =C a La •' o 1 L m y a Ej C +> �. V r L Y a q O 6 I M l O q p •. N `y N C— 9 L O• mm 9 m i -r'i 2 i O> -7Z = 9 wfY✓ O 9 c C �' � ar '• - O o•q '•�.t.0 Y�q° �ncra O ~YT w >' Y . o V _ r D r n✓ V Y y L y G N C V O> rN Vr. +� r N V rirr N N cP'• O U` Y • 00 O O P yaV a K` L O r ♦ ✓ L % E Y d L N Q P O c P j O N a V° V C.5 Y tl. PPV C i ti0 `� i p .��♦ O O V= �D �J V C O V Or � ! 49•• rr =F, wr r ^r T✓ �L =w O ^N t N O � � L O O Y O p L ° rI yy r f C > += + r i O O ')w Y tlO +p +E O V i L N L L E �= ��✓ i M Y w O tll w Y Y p L L r7� O !J� Q. pY WYMO py Cr C✓ N +NOM <M^ 2M0 '•NL <tlN �6M <f.i O < 9 N+ e W E -33 1^ El Lj __J = c =_ < o y rY � gr = v o L a a d a o �. -• o e< a O Y✓ Y Y F q �� ✓ Y C q �j � y H t�S �C -Or VC C yb Cr � G Pr C p 'J� q - O L O C n N Y py .i. _- N ✓� �r.mrr ) a q V V •J} c N r im? V C i Op✓ a Q V -.O1 O` V C-J' Y U pip q S C N T.' O Q P O q ✓�� 01 p✓ O N Y t° y 7 qn Z �NpC � �w W C r L i � ■ O q Q r V 7 L Q Y 6 N C 6- t� q L _L� Ly VC1Y ad•,`iN 4 �q C-y E Le 2!i C.:; y w 7 _ C N L' -✓ L V O V _ q C y q �E w _OG V wq PV TY pC 77 ¢� v n P ttj O O Y V V fiD y O m y- N O T 6 Y T_ L �wbVW V. SiG �� -� �m � -✓ eon c >�p ZEE o wc s V rLpV OpNp= ycC �•. Q Z� N= ^ p-�� t 6 q m Lrrp � d wry C -_O �•@ O p) � tT" Np YC ^O ✓9 J _ C O O� C N Y y q✓ O N d N Y Y L O n ✓ > T W 9 T m qa P L a P✓ L M Y d N rI q N dNr. r ✓ VC S C N C a6�c q r✓ Lry z C= =M . LN C Ow N dCdP +�Uzx �p WE Y 6Yq cG= �o K ou a sna-J W.X aL�q oy N �r a ij SJ ni <✓ C r C e Q Y u T p y O w _ y t D Z p O �.L..✓ yy i qp r C Y . O J✓ n C CCN O� m C 7� d _ C V V - i ✓ b Cry C `�trV Y N q u L i C 9r _NT O y C .COyg L Y ✓ 6 O C P y C w r M V C. O V � p L�� C Y 4 V 6 � r W .q. i •� r C `{ m Y� aCJ p L q N y T N V q V r ✓ CL " ✓L O D q '■ jS2i w 6= .L 2L PLV Y y E w N r C + pp O O _r mr. p o �O �ZV V n C ) Cy ^_ PC O y O N d ---t r r Y Y N R 'J O L M r: �L pV C C L] -z y O Z V L Oy �p pmt v O �� p TY y yrj C 6 O w m G q iS n q ✓< Y+ Lc nO; ! O ri p 0 M Y L O q C Y N O wcic Diu. `- t_.V+ l` Yptl, `O` L C Ot pL d C q Np� L.T+�OIL vOyC� pY Vb^ wq w_T +^ V'NVV ✓ (P. m -5 .i mi l\ 0 0p, � �y C -✓ Y V) T V V tN O C L q` .Yy C C OTC V ^_ YOw g �010� Or C _ � �O 00 O^ � ciY �u n +LV Y r .. < uc Lo °'✓ my nii Cq� VO Pr P� � Op^ V N6Y` � Lr V -J_ L C V V 8 1V� Cr 9• �Op[ Yn -T.OY q L �L Y � I r OL +� y ��G n G O� O V W Ir iY i Z • Y� V � q ti `G✓ p I `� S NO �� qq El Lj __J I V C p y y C E + � •� y N— V I Np Y tl Y V � "• M Y w 9� b Y PL MC P YP `� q � V C C$$ O N Y L •j T g Q N 6 ZL s d S � ka— Y:ba .P. B mG tiW' r °a+•- of y = I 1 obi •rl L e � v v 7 9�ca d-u �4 `L.• NG ���a L.� .. tea°. � { q�L _n z° ub _ °n• u.n +i °'c €E s a e y L ! E O. L L � d .� N • sE 9 N L E Y) V L.. I ' c'e � s � ao�Je •."" di, �y ie mu «°•� 8= = N � ` ` J V � N 9 � V ! » 1 d � 6 y - � N L. r.'7 O] •O q + V yu•N C .�O �b (• NN N � NJ I Vn 6 °1 N6 YIOV LC- +L .br a� ��r 2Y -T V= O_ VC ` � `-_C9J 'j4 ...� d�_ Y4 �i uP•n C. Cr E I I I q v i - • +y V i ? O -O -'Q a• VI CTEC° i�0• •V` LM Ol 1 f_7 _ b�L �q •�'Od O OSq, d FI N C ' N d C y , PV-JV JCr Oq• V•r0l 7CL ^nO.n Oq C�9� i9� °rL P.. �0 TOQOCry^- N L� � V • L J` J Y- J O N O O L V LPO L GNJ a`.r V( r 9 �rT r L 6 p wYLq ti...L Y :SyCV EMC N mT•O Py G r LN � fbaV �b YG YM` LSOd °•r 4V _ PuO 6 V d F Fr Q� V � O•-J ..r _ - =C � Ew V•�= ^'�'� �iL•rC� w.+.. �_� 6 N .V• Ci r E =C 7 NL• � LCC� COno Gw�JL+ C:5 q = O t' gr09V +� CSC••°. 9 b C COr -yJ NdrEL Y ` VSO -O g. G...°:. `tl�•LS Ni. LL..• G« G r Cq E -T • `aJC LL.]q 4�r DLO C Gr L i p0/Jee w grr C Or.L.• L U= t C =r Ld =Y rS C. °p wy e4 0. =y 7z b C v i9 r n6 > gGCO. p• Er Oi Vr�JC 2—Oz.— �LV YC 4w r G L L r O CT '^ ° r L 07; LO •Oi eC�C +e = tC P> O r u G E POw00 T9 p dy =z =r! Pr yYy `RrY� � V - M.V..M >m ��°p. N.I•p �! V r R �C O ij V NM F+ GlE> O «>. +Q Cr�B -_ GCS .• G O• • V MVV- aotl tl« •^ y� < Y QO� rl PI E c p C C d O> E P C P r V ye cE bOV J a `ODDj ✓ J ° O ` CN z— I L Y ^ V V¢e < O L u Ny L ¢�¢6 06 OD✓ J W O r P✓ Pay _ _J V V y p_ � �, NN Lu p D V y v C�yy� Q 6 ij y r w. Q• YOF � m T d` V fi p eon ca J V ✓r V L ^L S N � °N✓ 4 V i u �'rl � O M 6 I' b fyy ✓D"o Z C� L L °.'ic L ° T ip ✓C �• 1 z` c cG. Lm a r M Y Ytn4� a � a9i�� V � ° O ° C t Y{�I 9 CVO 6y °52 q- PO r C O ° T Ve2°° �C rY ✓y e D Ne .°,w rby c <(Q r iy« � 4 O � OL 1 V J y q O J p— V p P� q VV V ✓ 4 L L 6 Y Vri C L J` +V L— !�j V `� CVrt\— — o✓J � yL � d 'nT V ^✓ 6L C �� o40.^ of p ��V OC YL EV rWy O G a O OCV O✓ O` V � o — �✓ 4 V LPL O 1 �� ^ J — I� O y i O Y O. U V O C6� w � p° °C q � ✓� O 29M ✓Y O � Q Via" y C\ Ly �� CVD ✓Q Sl MV da l LL9 �� DV I� F y y N V P �.L.r TGJ r� W O r q q LLp r w V C i q d ' " `° �r Gio Wig` �� i a � ✓°� c `c �� d o � —° ; D� Y � D .. v. F_ �rDO ✓� m1 a` s y4r 1 ld "� m �✓ V L p�E ew �N WZ� r✓ VO � O_6 C� °yr L ...o:5� .nL e c ' 'V pO.b 2 — @p M 4 `1 ✓ � 1 6 ✓O j CL ✓°O 6 m O C V O � y V �I q � dLL N9 VV r,�d v °9 1LL _W a' � 2 12(� qL LI =LL O. G Qty O W C ,0, �� L� ✓ V -'� .a� CVVVVG N— T9 ✓N V yC0 L �u OL O qe V I pup q N �✓ a`JJT +N �I� � °O° 9S =r• O LLO Y! Y � LnO,F .V.� LL�r <V 6— LL�rbY S 4 ^i i I I !l i �Iiwl i i i,I E c p C C d O> E P C P r V ye cE El E O Q ` CN z— I S Y ^ V V¢e < O u Ny L ¢�¢6 06 iO W O r P✓ Pay N NZ r V y Q 6 t L yw e� m T V fi p eon ca J V ✓r V L ^L S N � °N✓ 4 V i u �'rl � O M 6 I' El E ` rd Y ^ L iO W P✓ Pay N r „L> r d t L m T p eon ca J V ✓r V L ^L L iV N � °N✓ 4 V T u �'rl � O L f 1n y 6 I' b fyy `i L ° T ip ✓C p r O TF� � r r Ytn4� a V � ° O ° C t Y{�I 9 CVO 6y °52 q- PO r C O ° T Ve2°° �C + 4 1 V J J q V V VV ' O. L 9 Vri C L J` +V L— !�j CVrt\— — � � rD LO iV pL -C i ` G a O OCV O✓ O` V � L — p V0 � C +V ��M C6� w � °C q � O 29M ✓Y O d Q Via" y C\ g'O � ...o:5� .nL e c N Vf b m 1 � 2 12(� El E G ]•_ O_ w -+u r we E 9 � _L � G c I V V o H o Y p V V C L ° •+ T_ Q1 9 J T9 C °1 b i d a ° a • a � V O V9 CO C ° G J V G CI 9 y L > PgG.r Y y bt Y_T 9 C w c } V V o L N .q L n '4d w V 95 r Ypp C Vas O .. «M d o� i W �v 1 u Y L 9 C C q Z. I i L y 0 E q y_1 G V 0�9 4 =_ d Ow � O b -• c vp �1! 1 �I G ]•_ O_ w -+u r we E 9 � _L � G c I V V o H o Y p V V C L ° •+ T_ Q1 9 J T9 C °1 b i d a ° a • a � V O V9 CO C ° G J V G CI G = LV P + L q V O = o q W N 9 ` W _s L� O� 9CZ 9 6 g c =— S _ r 7 V ° o � a- s Oq. T V4q u w C r V V O OC � 9 9 9 q � N N w u � E — O ` Y p 6 9 d w 9 a Y P g ° L V i � Y Y a � 9 ^ o c n rb q q i w d b •' N L V Y pi V ° O p V y L > PgG.r y bt Y_T 9 C _ c } V V O L N L L n L L+ LYUO �yy Ypp C Vas OWN «M � i Q 1 L Z. I i a c vp d — y S p ,• V O C r y q N q N p6 — 9 _ N V 1 y C L w V •n w V M w 9 d V •°. C • � L q N > LV 6 �� V` 9� L Y` =` Na NY n �• = o V O L > L�� L t5 _ ` WE LY ua M— r S.2. e Y a °9 rn�w 'e'm � •' _ o �°' =°• Hwy �=i wi �w r° C O W OW w N L V• Y Y L `> � 111111'...rrJM•••11Y 1�w <� 6M'J �9>. <_ 'J9 09 f— Y I • e P- 3� G = LV P + L q V O = o q W N 9 ` W _s L� O� 9CZ 9 6 g c =— S _ r 7 V ° o � a- s Oq. T V4q u w C r V V O OC � 9 9 9 q � N N w u � E — O ` Y p 6 9 d w 9 a Y P g ° L V i � Y Y a � 9 ^ o c n rb q q i w d b •' N L V Y pi V ° O p V s �I NI n y L > =o d •� c } 9 • N ^�i �yy Ypp C Vas OWN «M V Q L Z. I i s �I NI n IJ E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 12, 1984 TO. Chairman and Members of the Pianning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Gary W. Richards, Code Enforcement ^Titer SUBJECT: SIGN AMORTIZATION PROGRAM - tilSTORICAL /HARDSHIP I, ABSTRACT: The purpose ,= this report is to provide the Planning Commission with a status update on the Sign Amortization Program, and to take action on those nonconforming sign owners who have requested consideration for either historical significance or hardship status. 1I. BACKGROUND: In 1979 the City of R?echo Cucamonga adopted the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance. T`:is ordnance extended a five i5) year amortization period to all owners of legally erected signs that were found to be nonconforming due to the adoption of the Sign Ordinance. This 5 -year amortization period expired on May 4, 1984, at which time the City developed the Sign Amortization Program. This progran extended to all owners of legally erected nonconforming signs a 90 -day correction and /or removal period. The Sign Ordinance extends to owners of nonconforming signs the opportunity of requesting either Historical Siqnificance and /or Hardship Status.by submitting a written request to the Planning Department. The owners were provided this opportunity during the first 30 -days of the Amortization Program. The Sign Ordinance requires that through a public hearing process, findings must be made for each request of either historical signficarce or hardship status. Once granted, the applicant may retain their sign as so conditioned. Status Update of Sign Amortization Program: The Sign Amortization Program was implemented to remove or correct seventy -six (76) nonconforming signs displayed within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The following summary indicates the status of these signs to date.. ITEM Q PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Sign Amortization Program December 12, 1984 Page 2 Am 1. Number of nonconforming signs withir the City 76 2. Number of owners that have contacted the City does not create or cause a traffic hazard. 3. regarding their sign 61 3. Number of owners that have not contacted the 4. The City regarding their sign 15 4. Number of signs correctea or removed to date 16 - sign ...,ivoo Suu....vow for d}'rjsruvdi o 6. Number of owners requesting hardship status 8 7. nu, ,`.cr of owners requesting historical significance status 5 III. REVIEW -OF DESIGNATION REQUIREMENTS. Historical Significance Thirteen owners have requested either the Historical Significance or hardship Status designation. The intent of the Historical Significant designation is to determine if the sign in question is of historical significance to the Community. Ir t",e rlanning Commission makes the following findings, the sign may be designated as histcrically significant and retained by the owner. 1. The sign has historical significance in the community. 2. The sign does not create or cause a traffic hazard. 3. The sign does not create a visual nuisance to the character of the Community. 4. The sign is properly maintained and structurally sound. 5. The sign does not adversely affect adjacent properties. The following sign owners have requested the Historical Significant,_ designation: Magic Lamp Inn Sycamore Inn Thomas Vineyard Winery Opici Winery Farmer Jacks Restaurant (NOTE - See attached Exhibit "A" for applicant, sign type recommendation.) Hardship Status The intent of the hardship status designation is to determine those sites in which no other signing possiblities or C:k - PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Sign Amortization Program December 12, 1984 Page 3 alternatives exist that would provide adequate or reasonable signing for the property or sign owner. In these cases, the Planning Commission may allow the retention of a nonconforming sign if they make the following findings: 1. The site has a unique character or feature that causes visibility problems. 2. The sign does not create a traffic hazard. 3. The sign does not create a visual blight to the Community. 4. The sign does not adversely affect adjacent properties. 51 The sign is properly maintained and structurally sound. 6. No other signing alternative or design would be feasible or be able to provide reasonable signing ir, a=,: lance with the Sign Ordinance. If the Planning Commission finds that an extreme and unusual circumstance exists, but the design or condition cF the sign creates a v�sual blight, then the commission can grant a relief from the amcrtizat on of the nonconforming sign with the condition that the sign be remodeled to a more aesthetic design. If a business or shopping censer, found to have the above hardship and which coE;tains nonconforming signs, is remodeled, then the Commission shall have the authority to request that the nonconforming signs be upgraded to match the design and architectural style of the remodeled buildings. The following sign owners have requested for the hardship status designation: Red Hill Liquor MacDonalds C.M.A. Wine and Vinegars Town and Country Liquor Sunrize Shopping Center Brookside Winery Chaffey College Opici Winery (NOTE - Fee attached Exhibit "B" for applicant, sign type and recommendation). IV. RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that the Historical Significance andinr Q -3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Sign Amortization Program December 12, 1-984 Page 4 hardship status designations shown or Exhibits °A° and "B" be approved for the following applicants: Historical Significance - Magic Lamp Inn Sycamore Inn Tp=.-S Vineyard u :... -erg Opici finery Hardship Status - Sunrize Shopping Center. Res tfull • ubmitted, f� yti ck ornez rigv, Ian r IR"G:GR:cv Attachments �- ZA LA _, F-' ..r m tr x tY 11 Z �o Qtr U C Z O f.J N N .". tat = O C' L' O U LL Z C �v N W Li � z Q� V"t M 2' fn Z r 4 O 2 LAJ O U W tY w L E O Y iaY O tf i Y t �� t6 A = 14 CL L C CL O L C at O �+ L v d w T 6) 'm Y yT w AU2 C aY L V S- ^)YT vT L o a) v av- C T n a) O O w tC isL a =+ r d aL EE w L C a O a) t0 U- 7 C T m wa to t L a) )- - ea C T rto CL R 44 a - L L O d • Y L L Y p w nY N a) r n b aL C) V, w 9t 01� C TY > a C7 w to' T W V O +� um d O+ 0% d t6 L LL 0 tY .-t Y +� O II me tat L of Qa v tt- M C A C a t- Y q Ot T �+ a7 t0 r L QI r w T R r L V n" N S O 7pE N 0 a) N C r 0 -0 w m r m i t3 r d /6 C to b C t0 N C O=t • ?' tlh a) > C W%- air O a) A V Y C to 7L LL w C"0 aL-T CI a) Y = M O T tT C r r t w C w L to N Oat tt- Y r >f 3 a D1 t7 a^ n E a Y E L V O a C L a) w L C NL Y •6 O Ar W O 17 d a) a) L .god C't t71L C Of"C 3 w E O L C iT C C iT C y 0 3 Y C E �1 to Y to A+ 0 dyF- Or 3C L ;t ;t- -r C, CD D•N� A O ►+ O C to 0 O Oi a � 7T"C toL a L O L iL tot -a) d U N Y O Y Y C L L O G to C L C T 7 S- a) 0 C to d >2 >t fil O ♦..t r ch O O C Q tat O «.. Y'O N a) S-E L w Q 7 T n++ E w 0 S EE C d W w L r C 0 T C) .- 'O E d co 4- Y C L G t0 O L O O) O w O C to a) V a7 E C U 0 3 S- S- y r O w fJi W E to , S- C C to :7 C w to L O aT Y to 7 Lo w 7 O ty t6 a T r H }.-'77 C C tT C O= L cm a) C^ 0 t� O O w t0 L O •-t O ITY C V t =n n N C w n++ L 7 to tp E L 1 CO w CO to L ti U O p r Y t w D C> V r.t T to n 3 O r to Li ar 0 - a) w L as v - O t, rr C L 'EO Y tU tar O C to L t6 O� -0 T E L w s- > w O N C a p C -7 Y O C d - -3 Y to 90 . S. ai V n ry C L N �M tT T t- n 0 to Aj w n t0 t\ T a) O 0 :7 n3o+t - ^L 00> 0 G. n.cr� to m n'DUta Cr .-r T 71 tl) L r t� 4 w ¢ EE_d -0-0 n L w t6 to O C to T cm, C. Y 3C G L N 4- T O L C to T, d r i t9 d a)T , w F 7 a m V d> w^ >t C to w C �r T Or 01LLL. Otot- CT V O r 7 Y T r O) L w Y 0, � V C V C 0.1 tJ a) O to n O O Q7 •o a7 a O 0/ T, L rro:LLV�.toc nLL - ,zL).. v� tza v L3+-• to w L E O Y iaY O tf i Y t �� t6 A = 14 CL L C CL O L C at O �+ L v d w T 6) 'm Y yT w AU2 C aY L V S- ^)YT vT L o a) v av- C T n a) O O w tC isL a =+ r d aL EE w L C a O a) t0 U- 7 C T m wa to t L a) )- - ea C T rto CL R 44 a - L L O d • Y L L Y p w nY N a) r n b aL C) V, w 9t 01� C TY > a C7 w to' T W V O +� um d O+ 0% d t6 L LL 0 tY .-t Y +� O Y LL 7 O v to O V C X L - Ota to Y Y 0 w = w C) O ++ w> eva L LV-a? a) 4 0 •- � N M t_r d O N Of >> C O .0 C Q) Y t V V t to 0 Y L C t0 o u to V O (� V .� N > wTT It W L W L T C o r O G C1 p1T • >) O) w r w r r T w r L G tOn Y O w q)v to V T y- ° a C L D ZY to d O aECEj r T tYa w O E tl.. , t7)t Y 0 0)T a V a) w w a L w> Y d r- = o v to > w me tat L of Y L v tt- M 3 t- Y a a) C to 6 . W Y N Q)" T N X t0 Ot 1a a � w L t^ to T Y W Y LL 7 O v to O V C X L - Ota to Y Y 0 w = w C) O ++ w> eva L LV-a? a) 4 0 •- � N M t_r d O N Of >> C O .0 C Q) Y t V V t to 0 Y L C t0 o u to V O (� V .� N > wTT It W L W L T C o r O G C1 p1T • >) O) w r w r r T w r L G tOn Y O w q)v to V T y- ° a C L D ZY to d O aECEj r T tYa w O E tl.. , t7)t Y 0 0)T a V a) w w a L w> Y d r- = o v to > w w w • O y- - tt- v tt- y tt- v d OC O O C C O N L N L N T w T N X t0 Ot 1a > � Lol a' p O C Y w w C C a) C C d V P C L 0 to tT U '0 cn X -� v X WH = r CT X T tT C r V T X N w () Y w a 1 Y C= Ar OL•� C a) NL L t ¢U C't t71L C Of"C DLL Y Qt C C iT C C iT O CD w c~ w Y w C N O Z S L)LO ¢L�`ty V� too (u :n N C Y r C O C Y a) EEt,O EONi co w•_ E a=) co Try... � O E d co 4- w Y d mY m G),4 i 4- C) Y 4- N C4 _ _ Ell 7 w O O Sn N \ O to O N t0 O O 0- Y O co E C tt- LYE li.. tt- 7 O. tt- 7 rr d tt- 1 t i y.. Q cN 1 tS • to 1 CO w A Y L C t6 Q) C L" 7 • S j > Ia-• > Lol r w •� 10 ¢ w tl W m cc L � T WH = Cm C I j1.- rz A t0 to � C= Ar Je ¢U r t-wL TL C c qY O 2 1 p L O O Z S L)LO ¢L�`ty V� too Vm al wit EEt,O EONi co O � co m e) � t m (- co O U- .N -� N C4 to 11 4 � H m_ X W i a N Cis, O � rr G = = V. N I W ° N r- N H W � r O' N W Z O G O O V W C w N Of C y Ot C T O N R L w d i L i O R � Y C w R C Ey ^ O .- a � O w L y a R L >1 Y - w qXs wr Z O .o .:s C rr. w y r �T R > > IRS q q L q C w w > y O q w L r Y ro as o C C L y w d O -- C� R w r N a C y C C O1 O T q y w L i w L O co 4 d = C C R O E to C v � a d O y L R a L A - y� w d• to CL to as M, �T q > > to c w _RRL q C w d > y O R d r as O R E C C E L O y d U d Y d O to c� w T V'i 01 C . C y O3 C T O y � y R L w w L L >I O t_ q 'C Y C d R C Ey C O � 'C O w i.. y a q � v r w �Ta �'1 R � T .- w y a � > R • >1 � C d q q i R C d w > y O R O L > y r w o R E C C E L V d i.I d O� � � q y FD O L a N r T y > Q1 L >� y C � R T q a) A G t d i ++ m C y w y > wT •• °v a C w L Tw J.1 N � . a •- C R T C c rn as O to b S- 0 C w Y V � w c 0: q w Y N 01 C G y O) cT O y y V L d d L t i O R -7. M C Q; q C E to C �v` O •- li O w L N 6 d a Y �r w In " == a L'•r r W W, r q > > R eo to R C w w > N O q w w O R E C C EO Nd V G, CV o . 5 C •O C 3 w G. O S- S- r r = Y y QD y R wa o Ctx�w CV A w ^ R w d w Q3 O - =s a— C"o Y F- 0 y L to O. C O O y q q QIOC 4-Z R C N d a oY c L O O T R O T wy' OYL�� C wa1 O Gy d C � o O R R E ^+- OICm C J U C O wJ y C O T V y w d V C Gi R y L w O Lm s-IT y-- T 7 O to TOwwwL 71 _ y L L a� R q .TO R O4- 3 >3Vwtra41 O as L, r L }s; O to, X d L 4- to w w, L • C: Xj + L C R R OLD w w YE aC �Y O R In y c , W C G Q C Y 1 w C T > w L J g 1 w C 1V C r w a. w� y y OI wT Y Y W C w U V w S- I- 111 O w Y O 0= cr ,L to 4- V Y w L Y c r y L q Y t 01 r d Y r Y O FI E >1 L wN as L a i+ C O) Y T O m N C d C L Cl L O C C V v1 w w r L L •n q T w CA Y C Y T p y vi r O I y T ° to q U m T w C i w G •-� ar w y . y V � V yr V a J R w .0 .6+ G T L T 9 L w w yI C T y y L w In d L CaY f Of LI -T O N ) C d L 7 C C T C V 01 w w T L L y q T w y� y T o �x R V d T w C L w wTL -O 4- O w as Y y V w z v 0 O !° y N S- w w C^ yN L Y d rN C w !'1 N y L w E O q <n q O 7 R w w10 .A N •atd VLC wI O - CC> C V C C 40 w Y L Y O V C C 011_ w( 0 0 R 01 X R T V T X R T T > +- _ w st C O'0 O C L� w In . Q Y� y +1 y w Y w Y d O' .7 d R Y y U Z CL L C d w L 1V C L w C w ..I°'a C7 T 63 C C T C T w Q S- y Y +- -^ 01 C S. w L R wq w T T T r a. x C O G T O - > T V N ++ y CJ w d C w w 01 40 VI w a.is R ml O> C CL iI CL CL NT C OI -6%I _ ll- 7 OI w O] Ol R 0, CA 0 L OI as w C w^ p] O 7 r C w T C T C aY .n T O T L- as Y O ++ C E y T V• y T y r q Q 1, W y> E ^' R 4- y 7 R VI T r- 0. 4- +I w Y C q E O w .1.I w I d 1 %M, w , w Oti d E$ L , w L 4- Y 4- L f- O O w R O w O as T cn w O w R R-0 4- w +• C d4- 7 ak. a4- v) Z. X E O_4- 7 1 O V> O r O 1 1 1? 1 1 I R R CO 1 O' 0, 1 00 N m y co --t CO fM '- E 4- r ^, N CO us N r Cn •-1 alL y L L R O L O1� iI 'O r w> II' > to q V C d J m L 'fd tm C w w C' Z O .� o1r C• r T C 01 w Q 3 Q O J J L L c Y 7 Y o y C c a c O 0- a+ y :.+ O 00 I w L N 1d C U w C OI 7 06 •- O loo 3 0 O 10 L m q > T G G �_ O O la_ CL T S W � w = C G a N •-t -.-� C.. 'S7 w= _W O OI 1 N C t0 000 L C 4- 1[3 V N G �t0 i01 201 ON CS L RGO 2 w i1.0 V t0 • .-� O N i N 7 R =4= L: 07 a0 co f 11 �O Ncm i �~ Q'~ tONU h.-1 � RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DESIGNATING HISTORICAL STATUS ON NON - CONFORMING SIGNS) IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WHEREAS, the signs as shorn in the attached Exhibit "A" have been designated as nonconforming signs and; WHEREAS, the owners of the signs as shown on attacked Exhibit °A" have requested that the Planning Commission consider designating th-ir signs for Historical Significance and; WHEREAS, the Sign Ordinance of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Ordinance No. 65 B, Nonconforming Signs for the Planning Commissions consideration of said signs as Historically Significant. NOW, THEREFJRE, the Commission does find as follows: that signs shown on Exhibit "A" for the Magic Lamp and the Sycamore Inn, Thomas Brothers Vineyard Winery and Opici Winery have a Historical Significanceto the City of Rancho Cucamonga and further finds that: A. The sigr does not create nor cause a traffic hazard. B. The sign does not create a visual nuisance to the character of the community. C. The sign is properly maintained and structurally sound. 0. The sign does not adversely impair adjacent properties. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY GF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary U CA -7 PLANNING COWISSION RESOLUTION December 12, 1984 Page #2 I, nick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commissioi: of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adented by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Corunission held on the 12th day of December, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: i El E RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DESIGNATING HARDSHIP STATUS ON n ^N- CONFORMING SIGNS) IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA:40N*.;. ,;HCarpc; c;gn; ,down on E: `libit 'B° are non- , ;onforming signs in accordance to Siou QrdiOT.j1GP of t_.he fit_y of Rancho !'�y_arnnnna as Ordinance No. 6 B and; WHEREAS, the owners of said signs ms shown on Exhibit "8" have requested the City to consider those signs as a Hardship Designation and; WHEREAS, the Sign Ordinance of the City of Rancho Cucamonga provides for the City to consider Hardship Designation on those situations that have unusual circumstances that preclude normal signing and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered alp of the ® applicants requests and has determined that the Sunrize Shopping Center pussesses unique and unusual site configuration constraints which preclude normal signage to the center. El NOW THEREFORE, the Commission does find as follows: that tie Sunrize Shopping Center sign may be designated as a Hardship circumstance, because the site has unique characteristics and features that cause visibility problems. In addition the following findings are made: A. The sign does not create a traffic hazard. B. T;le sign does not create a visual blight to the consnuni iy. C. The sign does not adversely affect adjacent properties. 0. The sign is properly maintained and structurally sound. E. There is no other sign alternative or design which would be feasible or able to provide reasonable signing in accordance with this Ordinance. APPRUYED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION December 12, 1984 Page #2 BY: Denris L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: n ice:: aam�cc, ucpu..) Secretary I, nick Gomez, Deputy Secs- - ". -ry of the ?tanning Cowaission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereb-,, certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regula.„ meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of Oecemtar, 1984, by the following vote -'co -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONcRS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: �1- la El 11