Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1985/01/09 - Agenda Packet
1-09-85 PC A2enda I of 5 1CAA. s a G,Z y CTY Y OF W.'MO CL'CANIONr1k - o _ PLANNING Chi Tvussm 1077 WEDNESDAY p.m.. 11988Sp}�{Y�e�� /�J/ayn�u�arryy�9" )7.00 TALONS PARK i'V1RY1VrV�4il i 9,ENTETY.. 9161 BARE LINE , MNC$O CUCA&OBiGA, CALIFORNU I_ Pledge of Allegiance - EL Roll Call ' Coi,poi osio=- Bar- ar C'6mmissioner Rempel Commissioner Chites - Commissioner Stout Commiste,ioner McNiei i IIL Announcements f IV. Approv&l of Minutes October 10, 1984 r November 14, 1984 V. Consent calendar The following Consent Calendar items are ea. gated. to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted <on L the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. A. RECUEST FOR TIME EXTENSION - PARCEL MAP 3383 W BANKS =U .sated' on t e north side o-f Base Liner west o East Aiienue. B. REVIFiW OF CONCEPTUAL_, PLAN FOR TER'-%A VISTA-- NORTHWEST NEIGH RHOOID PARK AND =CONNED O 1�RAILS VL Public Hearings 1 The following items are public hearings in vhf& &46d n, ay voice their .opinion; of the ':slated project. recognized by the :: "Chairman and address the Cy.- , {issYasa by s£attc ; your name and addi!ess. All such opinions shall be fimited to 5-minutes per individual for each project' C. ENVIRGNMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8842 _- LEWIS OME P CALIFUR 41A i ion of 15.00 acres o land into- 2 parcela to the Terra nta Planned. Community located on the south side of Terra Vista Parkway, a st of Spruce AVenua -` ` APN 1077- 01 -02. } T D. ENYMONMENT.AL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT ].2872 „ - WESTERN PROPERTIES -- A total residential development o 128 apartment 4inits on 7 aon ores of land in the Medium Residential District (8 -14 du /ac) within the Terra Vista Planned Community, ' located at the southwest corner or, Terra Vista Parkway and Spruce Avenue - APN 1077 -091 -02 (a portion ). E. PARCEL MAP 8303 - CHRISTESON - Applicant's request for deletion o a condition oY acproval for a' division of 13.1 acres in the General Commercial' 111,*rIct (GC) located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and haven Avenue - APN 1077 -401: 01, 03. F ENVII014NENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8961 - I YLI' "--.NTERPRLSES - A division of 10 acres .of lent into —2 FA parcels in the General Commercial and, Industrial Area Specific_ Plan located on the `north side of Foothill' Boulevard, east of Center Avenue -APN 1077 - 401 -2$: G. ENVIRONMENTAL "P..SSESSMENT.' AND CONDITIONAL USE ;+ PERMIT 84 -37 - KRUSERT 'PAR RSHIP - Development of a 7,501. square foot car wash,, a gasoline dispensing station, and 9 (A�llary automotive facilities, on 2.5 acres of lard located at the northeast corner of Center Street and Foothill Boulevard in the General Commercial lopment District - APN 1077 -401- " 28. H. ENVIRONiVIENTAL �, ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT D15TRICT AMENDMENT :84-05 - yARYN -,,A Development District Aku n ment to prezone unincorporated territory as "Caryn Planned Community'•' for approximately 240 acres of land " located between the extension of Banyan Avenue and Highland Avenue on the north and south, and between the extension• aif Roci:ester and Milliken Avenues on the east and west -- APN 225= 141 -08, 12 -19, 21 -28, 225-151 -0t thrat:g i63, 07, 08, 10 through 13 r L ENWRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND THINTATIVE TRACT 12672 - tXi'N - :i res antial subdivision o 470 lots' on 115 acres -of land, which is part of a larger master planned community; located between the extension of Bapyan Street, and Highland Avenue on the north and south and between the extension of Rochester and Milliken Avenues on the east and west'- APN 225 141 -D8, 32 -19) 21 -28.. f.. u. n� A3 1 J. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CARYN DEVE OPMENT -.A Development Agreement between the Czty of Ranc 'o Cucamonga. and the Caryn Development Company, Haafmak anI Broad Land!, Company, erid Marlborough Development Corporatid.i relative to properties located between the extension of Panyan��Avenue and Highland Avenue op. the north and', sQUth, .snd ti��tween the extension of Rochester and Milliken. Avenues on the ept and west - APN 225 - 141 -08, 1249, 21- 28,225 - 151 -01 through 03,,,07, 08,10 th' -ough is. YII, new lBUSlness K. ENVliiONMENTAL ASST SSNtENT'AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW $r-vj,- V `s-UrM . he development of an 81,401 Sivare foot t office building.on t.5: acres of land located on the east si e of ' Cent4',_4 rende betiieen Entuorise Street and Commerce Genter Drive -A"M 2lo- 39t;:09 througn i5. VMI. Directo&�.Reporzt , , L. ALTA "COMA I,I IR STIAN CHURCH A review of outstending _,-issues regordiiig'CUP 83 -04, AIM Loma Christian Church, located .iin the v est side of Sapphire, between Demon and Orange Streets. M. `iICTORIA WALLS 'Y. VICTORIA PARK LA14B TRAILS O. REVIEW OF CONCEPTUAL PLATY FOR REID HILPj,COMMUNTTY PAR IX. Public Comments !f This is the time and Mace for the general pub is to address the Commissiom Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. L_ . X Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 1I'`p.m adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall.,;be hecr3 only with the consent of the Commfssion. i ;_ Chis" V 'ITY"'MAP c--1 —_,ji ■ i ' i I s Wf1bN6 C1WN,Y AY6MMU.MMt i.. l Vhh- I' GNAFaEr i ?► ti Ic _ �i..,��. � Q•iTYlr totLECE a � Eanrrt ♦ � rr . qq[[ 5.NIY «r ��� S £ oil l6— w. wwrlw �enM • 44i""CI>M. >II"gK i LION PAgi 'VT P HALL l g �/� a R = Vww ®>.a�ga..tro.ew. r n�.�INOSe.waa. WV- } ae e Amn � Asa P•• • _ v a x: 77 atn �y vi e &.. CUCANONOA•OUASTI COUNTY REGIONAL PAA'I 6NTARIQ (Ni):RNATIdNAI AIRPORT.' ' CITY OP;, RANC140 CUC•A,M1 t�t iY , WNUTES CITI OF.HvICHO CUCAMONCA PLANNING COM41SSIOR MINUTES Regular Meeting, +,obey 10, 1984 CALL; TO ORDER C:iairman Dennis Stout called the ',Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. The'meeting was held at the Lio:t.s Park ComMunity Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga. Chairman Stout then led in the pledge to the flag, ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: David Barker, Suzanne Chitiea, Larry McNiel,.flerman Rempel, Dew-is Stow COMMtSSi_:FERS ABSENT.: NONE STAFF MEMB8PS PRESENT: Nan!• Fong, Assistant Planner; Tim J. Beedla, Senior PIL ner Linda Daniels, Associate Planner; Rick Gomez, City Planner; Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil - Engineer; Edwar4 Hopson; A6zlstant City Attorney; Jean Kruse, Administrative Secretary; Dino Putrino, Assistant Planner; Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer ANNOUNCEMENTS City Planner, Rick Gomez, asked that this neetil:g be adjourned to October 15, 1984 at 6:80 p.m. for a workshop on the Terra Vista Planned Community at the Neighborhood Center, 9791 Arrow Highway, Rancho Cucamonga. MINUTES Motion: moved by McNiel, seconded by Ghitiea, curried unanimously, to approve the Minutes of the August 22, 1984 Planning Commission nesting. t1 CONSENT CALENDAR 1 i Chairman stout requested that Item A of the Consent Calendar be withdrawn fop discussion. Motion: Moved by Hempel, seconded by Barker,, carried unanimously, to approve the remaining items, B, C, v,. E, A F on the Consent Calendar. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -1- Or'ubber 10, 1984 Y B. - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84-39 - FORECAST - The development of an 18,500 sq. ft. office building on 1.1 acres located at the south side of Civic Center Drive, > east of Haven Avenue in the Industrial Park (Subarea 7) District - APH 208- 633 -38. C. TIME EXTENSION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 83 -05 - ETIWA.NDA INVESTMENT'- The development of a 411,000 sq. ft. t- arehouse distribution facility, on 23.8 acres of land in the Heavy Industrial (Subarea 15) category located un the south side of 7th Street, approximately 1,045 feet west of Et Wanda Avenue, Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 6658. 'II D. TIME E %TENSION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 83 -02 - BARMAKIAN - The development of six (6) industrial buildings totaling 25,032 sq:'fte on 1.57 acres of land in the General Industrial category (Subarea t), located on the north side of 8th Street, west of Vineyard Avenue - APN 207 -271 -53, 54 and 55. E. CONCURRENCE WITH THE CONCEPTUAL PLAN FOR CUCAMONGA CREEKSIDE PARK F. CONCURRENCE WITH BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT CONCEPT PLANS FOR CARNELIAN STREET AND BASE LINE ROAD A. TENTATIVE TRACT 12490 - AMERICAN NATIONAL - Reapplication for Design Review of site plan and ,architectural changes for 121 condominiums on 6.1 acres of land, located on the east side of Vineyard, south of Foothill. Chairman Stout asked if there will be a request for continuance of this item to October 24, 1984. Mr. Gomez replied affirmatively stating because of the issues raised during Design Review the applicant is redesigning this project and will bring it back, Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by Barker, tarried unanimously, to continue this item to the October 24,, 1984 meeting. PUBLIC HEARINGS G. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -21 - ALTA LOMA CHRISTIAN CHURCH A request to convert an existing 1,862 sq. ft. single family residence to an office for the Alta Loma Christian Church on .25 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District, located at the Hest side of Sapphire, across from Orange - APN 1062- 332 -23. Tim Beedle, Senior Planner, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout asked Mr. Beedle what the applicant's response has been.' Mr,. Beedle replied the applicants are concerned about delays to the project and are interested in the compatibility and land use issues. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -2 October 10, 1984 f % Commissioner Barker asked if a precedent would be set in approving this Conditional Use Permit and if it would make it possible for others to argue that you could use a house for a church or office facility. Mr. Beedle replied it would and that he is not aware of any other project that was approved as a temporary facil:}y. Commissioner Hempel stated there is another church in the community that has used a residence for offices and related uses. Commissioner Barker asked what ehlzrnh. Commissioner Hempel replied the Brathren in Christ Church. Mr. Beedle stated that it is next to another residential. area. Commissioner McNiel asked if the design criteria issue has been dealt with. Mr. Beedle replied teat they are working on a Master Plaax and that the City has not seen a design that addresses the criteria Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Mr. David McLeary, Minister of the Alta Loma Christian Church, gave some background on this project indicating he was unaware of any problem until about a week ago. He, stated they were advised there would be questions which needed to be addressed and he asked for continuance of this project in order to address the concerns raised. Chairman Stout indicated the concern with a Master Plan for this whole area as well as the way the house is set up. Mr. Bill Ungles, 6375 Sapphire, asked if this hoaso is converted into an office if commercial standards and commercial zoning would be given to this property. Mr. Stout replied it would ", not be rezoned commercial and that most likely it would have to conform to c,ifice / professional standards. He indicated more parking space would be rilquired. Mr. Ungles cited other problems with this property such as flaading,, retaini:+ wall, and elevations, and askad if they would be allowed to hold Bible classes or post signs on, the property„ There were no further comaetits and Chairman. Stout closed the public hear 1 Chairman Stout asked what a realistic date would be for continuance of this 1 item. Mr. Beadle replied November 14, 1984. Motion: moved by Barker, seconded by Hempel, carried unanimously;, to continue this item to the November 14, 1984 meeting. PLANNING COM ISSIOA MINUTES -3- €knob er .0, 1984 r' ` {�5 P2 g to et raa p 3U COi102 Zb aPProyed eu 13.ty on 3 a 9505 gt'z N2 of an tora r 'iodated Oe iAOt Slaj t vex to 7 a�i seif °se area 31 trio C, . or a uest t d r ' enoe ndu$tri-al Q � I� I; 2019 -431' dAa the Ga£ A a ald Avenu A tha staff report. ,Street$ nest Dano putrixio= reviesz th a change of st t a ner xened the pubiio hea Kea "t the CUP e�Piras Ki t oP a;irmah gtou aPP1'''cantt as s elosad. shou2.d h the pis P rti CUY p�ei MoDat � Jut, �.id hearing ou�.ar antes the P a oyxxershiP' Nrther oo0 th e ueinS no at there is no reason �� tier ..out replied th oanSe' iatin t� tht': aPPxicant »e r. no problem pith the 451ant to an d then erg to be e At. o appraval' Beadle state i£ this 3 s is a tu'11Y riee masts; ro t4r av d Ci1P or y'net t this i's a new and. on of the on�� the pother one aCtiair0an Stout rePiie ish na'ware t n uld run ednaurirentiY resolution, wo the son stated in a new ones aB added *' aoP if ;is s - Id be be +iaietea. be tie t addit n 5 ,h #u d then ia. sons' adopt and ed that dition o. izousiY' to xi that Can Bee die rep and anted aarOA '3nan ISTGP s and that Maki ed by �ot��.els addit;ia Asa t ai ith i�sioner e1 s ("nand Ci; f Ist' Condition Cntss� ' B Twop 'ovI.nStha ax tins 14oved aPP- to Motjoi�� ion go- to tie it Con aitior& 6 e LL���+V¢d4 Condition $753 "" TLdC Wars' i t n ea$t of the AAD VjAC% - � ce1 s ' 6th Scree ' * ^SSSSM to w P cart iRCNxA� acres in iooabad n dViekra o t (S2Eat3r a X51 9239 • staff .report ` i. yip. » D4strio eioP�ent xS �venu Dui 1{auSeaut revie�,ed the this Ite in afxer the 111 poahaste iS Sr,SineerI p the in bring" S t .Ixaiude S did not e Senior Civ t quaat xove , tin osed the pr t did 4 e Yty Char n 4 been approve as ori"epa �n9 � a� first ' Parceling ° �ha Ni al a a ao�g ra�ow b that xxo't iatie P t of fir. a bl s s r� tfor tnn St tad o Bet t apprnvai ou 110e and the totobez: 10, 19BA the necessity aP�'iioaapPro al. 'earth grater for this . u bae% .. plliiiG Ct SSS.O� �'i1S • f H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 34,26�- STORALL - A request to convert 754 sq. ft. of an aggrovsd building into a can;,Bker's office and residence for a self - service storage facility on 3.51 acres of land in the General Industrial (Subarea 3) District, 10eated at 9605 9th Street, west of Archibald Avenue - AP- 209- 031 -043. Assistant Planner, Dino Putrino, reviewed the staff report. Chairmanw Stout opened the public hearing. Mr. Daniel MoBeth, th ;u, applicant, asked if the CUP eXpires with a change of ownership. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Chairman Stout replied that there is no rer3oa why, this particular CUP should run with the applicant. Mr. Beedle stated there is no problem with this change., Mr. Hopson asked if this has been set up to be an amendment to an existing approved CUP '. whether this is a totally new grant of approval. Chairman. Stout replied that this is a new one. Mr. Hopson stated he is unaware of the condition of the on -site improvements, however, if this is a new ere, it should run concurrently with the other one and be tied in. Mr. BE1edle replied that additional, language would be added to the resolution. Commissioner MaNiel indicated that Condition No. 6 should then be deleted. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by IL-Niel, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 84 -114. approving CUP 84 -26 with additional Language in Condition No. 4 to tie it in to the existing Conditional Use Permit and that Condition No. 6 be deleted. a�aa :�t 1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8763 - ROCHESTER FREEWAY NORTH 1'D. - A di'rision of 9 acres into 2 parcels in the General Industrial Development District (Subarea 13) located north of 6th Street, east of Old Rochester Avenue APN 229 -261-9239. Senior Civil Engineer, Paul Rougeau, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout questioned the timing in bringing this item in after the project had been approved. Mr. Rougeau explained that as originally proposed the project did not include a public street and since it was not in the first concept it did not involve the necessity for the street and the immediate parceling of the property. Further, the applicant wanted to get that approval out of the way and come back later for this approval. PLANNUG COMMISSION MINUTES -4 October 10, 1984 Ci,_irman Stout.asked if this is consistent with the project currently under submittal'. Mr. Rougeau replied it is. Chairman Stoat ,pened the public hearing, Mr. Pete Pitasi, representing the applicant, indicated they have reviewed the Conditions of.Approval and are in agreement with them. Commissioner Rempel asked if the street as now shown is in conformance with the original plan as it is not now before the Commission for comparison. Mr. Pitasi replied that it is, as 25 feet of landscaping is included. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Rempel9 carried unanimously, t, 'ydopt Resolution No. 84 -116 approving Parcel Map 8800 with bbe issuance of a Negative Declaration. K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84-24 - CHAPPIE - A proposal to operate a 1,050 sq, ft. auto rental office and maintenance of a maximum of 15 automobiles within an existing commercial plaza on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, west of Archibald. Avenue - APN 208-261 - 52. - Assistant Planner, Dino Putrino, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Nanette Neremberg, representing, W�Astern Commercial Development Corporation, provided the Commission with a pttition that had been signed by tenants in this location indicating their support of the proposed use of office space as a car rental leasing office. There being no further comments, 3 public hearing was closed. Commissioner McNiel stated his appreciation of the fact that a given number of spaces had been designated for parking use for the rental agency; however, he believed that other tenants would quickly become annoyed if ca5tomers of the rental agency constantly used the other tenants' spaces. Ms. Neremberg replied that they would be responsible in seeing that parking space use was not abused. Commissioner Chitiea asked if some.type of security would be provided for rent =l cars during the night. Mr. Chappie, the applicant, replied that it would be provided. ` PLANNING COMMIS.!.TON MINUTES -5 October 10,, 1984 IC J Following brief discussion, it was,�Moved by McNiel, seconded by Barker, �. earr-Led unanimously, 'to adopt Resolution No. 84 -117, denying Conditio:ial Use Permit No. 84 -.24. Chairman Stout stated that the following items wovld be heard concurrently. L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 84 -04A - HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT - A General Plan Amendment from Office to Industrial Park for approximately 40 acres of land located on the west side of Haven Avenue, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow 11i.ghway, in conjunction with the Haven Avenue Overlay Aistot - APN 208- 331 -01., 12, 13, and 2NI-,341- 01. i M. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 84 -04 - HAVEN AVENUE GVERUY DISTRICT - A Development D3striet Amendment from OF (Office /Professional) to ISP (Indust,rial SPecific Plan) for approximately 40 acres of land located on the west side of Haven Avenue, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Highway, in conjunet1lin with the Haven Avenue Overlay District APH 208-331 -01, 12, 13, and 208 - 341 -01. N. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ,1ND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 84 -01 - HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DI.S'TRICT An amendmaifL to the Industrial Specific Plan to expand the boundary of Subarea 7 (Industrial Park Category) to include approximately 40 acres of land located on the west side of Haven Avenue, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Highway, in conjunction with the Haven Avenue Overlay District - APN 208 - 331 -01, 12, 13 and 208-341 01. Curt Johnston, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout asked if action i:�u these items could be taken at this meeting. Mr. Johnston replied it Gould•, however, although a resolution has Dot been prepared, the environmental assessment could be done. Chairman Stout indicated that these items are contingent ' upon the Overlay District and if there is none, these changee would be unnecessary. Mr. Johnston stated that the Chamber of Commerce subcommittee agreed with the goals established for Haven Avenue and the Planning Commission's. comments. However, concern was expressed regarding the railroad tracks,near 8th Street and the Chamber of Commerce asked for preservation of the area to provide rail service for light manufacturing use. Further, they agreed with Saud use and were interested in the proper balance of support uses for office professional. Mr. Johnston stated staff has no problem with the rail service as long as designs meet the intcat of the Overlay District and that there be no rail service loading docks visible from the street. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -5- October 10,. .144 Mr. Johnston stated that regarding the Master Plan requirements, the Chamber Committee suggested that the architecturel requirements be removed from t,9 Master Plan. He indicated that staff's comment here is that staff thinks the architecture needs to be consistent with the Mast&* Plan to produce architectural compatibility. Mr. Johnston suggested th t another alternalU,-a is to add another policy dealing t;ith the consistency of architecture.. Regarding :'lag orientation, the Chamber Committee recommended having no parking along Haven; however, staff recommended a percentage to provide design flexibility. Mr. Johnston stated that the Commit:,tee's recommendation is that for streetscape and landscaping coverrige, it he reduced to 25 percent and to 30 percent in the interior of the corridor. Mr. Johnston stated that staff does not have any problems with their recommendations as long as they tighten down exactly wl,4 will be included in the stroet furniture. Further, that one of the things ti,ey are looking at is to actually have a landscape architect do a design theme for Haven Avenue. Mr. Johnston related th-Qt regarding architecture, the Committee was looking for a variety of styles that could be used to promote Haven Avenue. He indicated that there reeds to be some balance and they will work on a policy that will meet theirs and the committee's goals. Chairman Stout stated it is really difficult to deal with all four items at the same time because the last one is really c different animal and, therefore, the first three will be discussed first. Mr. Gomez s{cated that tbe5a items are for the Commission's consideration tonight only and no action is expected to be taken. Further, staff wants feedback on what has bets proposed and whether it is appr .)Uriate. . hairman Stour, opened the public hearing. Mr. Jim Barton stated that• a minimum of 450 feet depth is needed along Haven for parking, etc. in order to have the taller buildings work. He stated thgt;' - -- 660 feet is more than sufficient but 350 feet is really getting down tight. Mr. Joe Dilorio, representative of the BIA Commercial and Industrial Council and Chair of the Chamber subcommittee studying Haven Avenue, stated it would make more sense if items L, M, N and 0 wero discussed all at once. Chairman Stout explained the rationale of taking the three items together so that one does not end up in the General Plan and the other in the Industrial Specific Plan. There were no further conments, therefore, Chairman Stout closed the public hearing. Commissioner Barker stated that Medium High designation currently exists on the northwest side of the intersection and also asked about the distance South of Civic Center Drive and depth of the parcel. PLANNING `DMMISSION MINUTES -7- October 10, 1984 Mr. Gomez replied that part of that was dealt with on the Master Plan 2s part of the parcel map requirement to give the designer ar.d the City ilexibil ty in dealing with the constraints of perking and circulation on both sides-. Further, the Master Plan and Overlay District would deal with the design issue. Commissioner Rempel stated that,when this project vas originally, talked about the Commission never said they Mould change the use on it. Mr. Rougeau explained why the owners set the frontage at 350 feet. Following brig "-.discussion it was the consensus of the Commission to have the whole area exiuiued as part cf the Overlay District. Mr. Gomez staffed that the two major areas of interest are the depth and the Master Plan of the Overla;;= as it applies to that area. e mum m 0. LA-11 AVQLIU . VVQnt,al Ll.Lw71A1{+L r-Lunning Lammias, ;on reirlew oI- pUDJ.10 comments and recommendations from the Chamber of Commerce regarding the Interim Development Policies for Haven Avenue, between 4th Street,and Foothill Boulevard. Chairman Stout opt6dd the public hearing. Mr. Joe DiIorio talked about the Chamber of Commerce subcommittee meeting dealing with the Haven Avenue issue. He advised that in the early days of the City, Irvine had been used as a raference to what Rancho Cucamonga might someday look like in tarms of h�W it would grow and mature. Mr. DiIorio advised that Uie subeommitee felt that landscaping is critical to the look they wish to achieve and that t "he control of traffic is another critical issue. lher important areas were: no strip or spot commercial; Haven mt ',. is the hi&rf point in the City; concern with the railroad running through this Area; non-,uniformity in architectural style, and varied buildin% heights with high design quality. Chairman Stout asked how high deign is enforced and how you legislate taste. Mr. DiIorio replied that you can punt to Barton Plaza on one end and Chevron on the othQr end and the gas atotion ois haven as being the most aesthetic in the State of California. leurtheri, as long as you lay down groundrules, it will not become another Archibald Avenue. Chairman Stout stated that he sits on Design Review and there are many well intentioned people who come in and say that their project far exceeds the design criteria. He indicated that they always ask to be shown something in writing,;. i a F!LAUNTAG WMMISSION' 13INUT&S -8- October 10, 1984 Mr. DiIorio cited an instance when a major company mpt informally with the Chamber Board and discussed their project. He indicated that in a couple of instances this has worked in getting the type of developmrnt that is wanted. He further stated that,peer pressure among the developers _3s worked to a great extent ua well. Parking along Haven Avenue was discussed with different ways of designing to allow such parking. Commissioner McNiel asked if there had been any discussion in the Chamber subcommittee meeting regarding design theme and archite:�tural relief with regard to restauraits, banks, etc. aiIorio replied that as a group they feel strongly that Haven Avenue n3eds :aa a iot of architectural style and, as far as parki,tlg is concerned, t "re car. be surface parking as long as it is broken up and can be Diseussior, ensued among the Commission and Mr. DiIorio relative to the way parking was handled in the Irvine area, especially along MacArthur Boulevard. Architectural style along MacArthur Boulevard was also discussed with favorable comments in being a model for Haven Avenue. Mr. Dan Rinhnrds. member of the Chamber of Commc ^ce and the BIA, indicated that there are q%her, issues of concern to the si.aller develeoers. He asked if the Commission will also consider other uses than have been propasea such as they have done in the instance of rail served parcels. He indicated that the smaller developers would like some opportunities to discuss these other uses and alternatives. He stated further that a Master Plan for the area is fine, but they want to be a part of it. Mr. John fialeher, of Y:nwis- Homes, expressed concern with the interim documrut language that refers to Foothill and Haven as an urban center. This, because of their property at the nor:hheast corner of that intersec -;`:on and the fact that it is shown for an entire�y different use. He :ranted to be sure that the Overlay District extends only to Foothill and not north of it. Mr. Henry Reiter rtp,tad he felt that the evolution of large buildings on Haven— has messed up the community Lneredibly and felt there rust t,e further discussion about the concept. He indicated what the Commission is trying to do is hide the large buildings with larger buildings. He asked for specific giidelines on Haven Avenue that would promote growth. Chairman Stout asked if there was something intimidating about the forum of the Planning Commission. Mr. Reiter replied that it is not intimidating, but he felt that mere could be accomplished over a pup of coffee rather than having a project that has gone through the process .)f being rejected which makes everybody look bad. Mr. Don Barmakian, Local developer, expressed ceneern regarding the Haven corridor and the absorption rates of office space„ He cited figures on availability in the City of Ontario and what is being built in Rancho, Cucamonga, indicating that there Ls no need for so ouch high end spE- e. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -9- Oetuber 90, 1§84 I Mr. rarmakian agreed with the object, of the City of 71ancho Cucamonga in trying_-.. to enhance its image with urban centers but felt that the middle c- the corridor ,'aes need additional attention. Mr. Bill Kirkland, owner of KVL west Coast (letting, indicated that they will be leaving the community because of the image being promoted by the City. He felt that businesses such as his no longer fit in and are unable to be maintained with tae high standards that are currently being sought Chairman Stout asked Mr. Kirkland what caused him to reach this conclusion and stated he felt Mr. Kirkland was overreacting. He indicated that what Mr. Kirkland had just said concerns him as an individual. Mrs. Rosalie Mandella, 8635 Country Club Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, stated she and her parents are in concurrence with what the City is trying to do. Mr. DiIorio stated that the Chamber of Commerc3 does not cant to give anyone the impression that they are - `rye tn% Ph--Qe anyone out of the community. Further, that if there is any concern with any of the existing industries over what is being done, to let the ;,;amber cf Commerce know about it. Mr. Dilorio stated that they do not want to endanger any businesses, especially tose that have been here for a number of years. There being no further comments, the public hearing was clossd. Commissioner McNiel reiterated what caused the Haven Avenue corridor study to take place anc the need for philosophical standards. Chairman Stout indicated that this is the first out in the process _f establishing standards and he was convinced that they will come up with something everyone can live with. Commissioner Barker stated it was interesting that this began with Mr. DiIorio's commen_, -ggnesting that they be given the latitude to do 'What they want to do, giv 'ersity, creativity and quality, and what we want them to do, and tie it i the landscaping to full circle with Mr. Reiter's comm,nas of tell ut to 1;o. Commissioner Barker stated that landscaping must be used to the maximum, there must be a theme and that iiversity is important -- fte indicated the imports,•�e of guidance so that this does not become the Levitt Town of high tech. He, expressed concern as to how this would be used along the railroad and the area that Mr. Richards wants Pxtended to all small land owners, Because of this, Commissioner Barker stated that the Commission will have to be careful not to give the special interests so much concern as to ob*iiate any reason for Vpe Overlay District. Commissioner Rempel stated that the guidelines for buildings is what the Commission will not be able to do. Further, they will not 'ell anyone there is a design for Haven Avenue. Commissioner Rempel indicated that the size of property must be taken l.nto account and that these different sizes and businesses must all fit in,,• PLANNING COMTISSION `INVES -lo- October 10, 1984 ti d i A In regard to the,statements made by Mr- Kirkland,__Commi, ^tr,aer Rempel'stated - -• that the Planning Commission is'not telling anyone that they must pick up and move and they are not forcing anyone to do what they do not =cant to do. Commissioner Chitea indicated that good points were made regarding the parking situation and that they should lock into the aspect for creative design for Maven. She felt that the Commissior w..-,3d have to stick with a firm statement of what it wants for Haven Avenue, that if the Commission allows a lot of diversity and there is a lot of flexibility on top, he Commission must abate that it will be within a certain range and the Commission must say this is what we wart. She indicated that the Commission is trying to stop',,asted time in Des#'; iew. Mr. Gomez asked for specific areas of concern in order to develop specific language. Commissioner McNiel stated toner what the Commission is saying 13 that they want high tech quality and they are also saying that they dW t Harm to see a specific imprint of architecture. Chairman Stout indicated that wham the Commission needs to address are the concerns which have been heard and what is In the resolutioA in yuch a manner as to have positive choice. He indicated further that this could be done in addressing these as issues. L,^. Gomez requested that if -ne Commission shared the concerns expressed at this meeting that they be conveyed to staff so that they, would incorporate them into the resolution. Chairman Stout did not feel that this could be done at this meeting. Further, Chairman Stout indicated that if someone has specific problems with a project they could r ;ne to the Commission on a project -by - project basis to address the specific issues, which, he thought, would be Setter than zimply saying that they will use light industrial in this par= icalar area and it could be difficult to say that the Commission will make exceptions without seeing the projects. He indicated that he would really not like to deal with that issue. On anothe,- issue Chairman Stout stated that people tend to want to make land uses what is rark-c�table now or three years from now and it is the job of the Planning Commission to mete plans 20-30 years down the "sine. He indicated it is impossible to know if they can sell till the property along Havan ;within the next few years for high office but fhat is not relevant. He indicated that they are looking ahead more than just 2 -3 years. Chairman Stout expressed bie concern that one individual feels that he is being forced out of the community. He indicated that for as long as lie has been on the Commission nothing has been done to change that particular area and the Commission has dealt with non- ^onforming uses and is very flexible nerd hz%A done all kinds of things to be fair and equitable. He indicated again his concern about that kind of statement. Chairman Stout honed that the Commi. -pion could pass a resolution that everyone will be happy with. PLANNING CiMMISSION MINUTES -91- O tobav 90, 1984 9;15 p.m.'- The Planning Commission recessed. - 9:40 p.m. The Planning Commission reconvened. NEW BUSINESS P. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84-42 - BARMARIAN - The development of a. 2 -story medical office building totaling 19,100 sq. ft. on 1.0; acres of land in the Industrial Park category (Subarea 6) located at the northwest corner of Haven Avenue and Trademark Avenue - APN 210- 381 -01. .Associate Planner, Linda Daniels, reviewed the staff report. Commissioner Barker asked if a meandering c, ?Aewalk and easement was rrquixed as part of the conditions. Mrs. Daniels replied that the regiarement was contained within the Engineering Division conditions and was aereptable to the applicant. Commissioner Chitiea askpa ttho names the streets. Mr. Rougeau replied that these were named by the subdivider, however, now there is a more thorough reviewing process for street naming. Chairrx:_ Stout opened the public hearing. Mr. Pete Pitasi, representing the applicant, stated thit the Conditions of Approval had been reviewed and are acceptable.. Chairman Stout commented on the color of brick shown in the applicant's rendering as being verl attractive and the apparent difference with the actual sample.: He indicated t►, t he would p:afer the color to be more like the rendering, Motion: Moved by Hempel, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 84 -118, approving Development; Review 84 -42 and issuing a �0 Negative Declaration. Q. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 84 -31 - MORE AND STEELE - The development of a 12 -unit apartment unit complex on 0.88 acres of land in the Medium Resi�lntial District (8 -14) du /ae) located at 8670 Arrow Highway, on the north side of Arrow Highway between Baker Avenue and Vineyard Avenue - APN 207 - 201 -12. Associate Planneir, Linda Daniels, reviewed the staff report. -Tom Harris, representing the applicant, stated he would answer any questions. Commissioner Harker reaaarked that he had viewed many fine projects as part of the recent Planning Commission tour of projects. He indicaf ;ed that during the tour, people he had spoken to in other apartment complexes expressed concern PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -12- Octoi,r 10, 1984 with burglaries.-that had taken place in their units and asked if there migL,' be some protection afforded to tenants. Based on their inquiry; Commission.° Barker ast,ad if some type of alarm system could be installed in this project or whether it could be pre -wired for some type of alarm system. Hr. Harris replied that the City of Rancho Cucamonga is already very restrictive in their demands for Prot - notion su <3h as deadbolts on doors and window locks. He indicated that this is a ver: small project and the protlems that wetm related by Commissioner Barker might be those associated with the larger --omplexes. Chuiev2x, Stoat indicated that Commissioner Barker,— — arested in security because there aru some people who woulb look 6't,,4, t :k ' `. 4aeh as this one and see that there are 12 television sets per acre, anti asked Mr. Harris if he would be completely against some kind of security system requirement. Further, that he did not knew and asked whether, it would be marketable or expensive to include. Mr. Harris replied that burglar alarm systems in themselves arei not that expensive. Commissioner Barker asked if at this stage in the project it would have a large impact to install either the wiring for a burglar alarm system or a system. Mr. Harris veplied that it would not have a large impact. Mr. Gomez indicated that staff would explore this with the Sheriff's Departueat. Commissioner' Barker asked that the Commission be p.sovided the: results bf the staff investigation regarding alarms. Mr. Gomez asked if the Commissicnn is talking atiw(, imp-,sing this condition on this particular project. Commissioner Barker replied that since he does not know what the state- of-tYv�-_ <_ art is regarding alarm systems, he would await staff's report; however, he felt something should }e started at this point. Thera being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Rempel, se=ceded by McNiel, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 84-40A approving Development Review 84 -31 with the issuance of a Negative Declaration. r i �. '�, a �" ✓tf ��(;: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -13- Octo'ber. 10, 1984 R. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEV 84-06 - COCA COLA A request to- expand a previously Approved wareholtse addition from 21,600 ` - -- sq. ft. to 81,200 -sq. ft. on 9.2 aeres of land in the Industrial Park_ (Subarea 9) category located at the northwest corner of 6th Street and Utica Avenue - APN 209- 411 -16. S -nior Planner, Tim Beedle, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout opened the ,public Isaring. Mr. Paul Ramirez, representing Coca Cola, advised there were no problems with the condition of this project. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 84 -119, approving Development Review No. 84 -06 with issuance of a Negative Declaration. * -M,** COUNCIL REFERRALS S. CASAi.ET.TI'S POLKA PALACE - Potential General ?Ian and Development Dintriat change on the property generally located southwest of highland and Etiwanda Avenues. Chairman Stout opened Lbe meeting. Mr. Bob Casaletti came forward and requested that his name be spelled. correctly. He then provided background <,n when the Polka Palace was constructed and the zoning that was assigned in 1946. He requested that rather than the present zoning designa`ced by the General Plan, he be allowed to again have commercial zoning. Mr. Casaletti also requested an explanation of a conforming and non- conforming use. Mr. Beedle explained conforminj and non - conforming uses to Mr. Casaletti. A discussi<in ensued among the Commission members on whether a mistake had,been made in ';he General Plan designation for this property, what a proper zoning might be, and whether this property should be afforded some kind of protection. The discussion was not resolved by the Commission members aiid Chairman Stout closed th3 public hearing. There teas further discussion on what kind of finding would have to be made in order Tor the zoning to change. Commisvioner McNiel asked if there is some way to protect this property_ without rezoning it and asked for investigation by the Historical Preservation Hommiszion for agnation as an historical building. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -14- October 10, 1984 Commissioner Chitiea askwi if this could be held in abeyance until it is --- examined by the Historieal,Preservation Commission. The consensus of the Commission was that this be forwarded for consideration of designation of an histori��al structure lay the Historical Preservat &,q Commission. Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Rempel, carried unanimously, to adjourn to October 15, -1984 at 6:30 p.m. at the Neighborhood Center for a work session to review the Terra vista Planned Community. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission adjourned at 11:115 p.m: - i t i j i ji j. i rrr f a PLP�f W CON,iuSSION MINUTES -15- October 10, 1984 NTY:.0F RANCHO CUCAMONGA `AAMING COMMISSION MINUTES- Regular Meeting November 14, 1984 +� Chairman Dennis Stout called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Co mission to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was held at Lions park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. .Chairman Stout then led in the pledge to the flag. ROLL CALL CORWSSIONERS PRESENT: Suzanne Chitiea, Larry McNiel, " Herman Rempel, Dennis Stout COMISSIONERS ABSENT: David Barker STAFF PRESENT: Tim Beedle, Senior Planner; Dan Coleman, Associate Planner; Linda D. Daniels, Associate Planner; Rick Gomez, City Planner; Barrye Pipson, Senj.ar Civil Engineer; Edgard Hopson,: .Assistant City Attorney; Otto Krouti� Senior Planner; John Meyer, Assistant Planner; '` Janice Reynolds, Secretary; Paul ' Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer APPROVAL I MINUTES Commissioner Remael requested an amendment to page 10 of the ( October 24s 1984 Planning Commission minutes. He stated that the third paragraph relating to { ;. Developmrnt Review 84 -44 should read that a storm drrain should be installed to � drain. Hallman from north of Base Line to the storm drain at the railroad. Commissioner McNiei stated-,that the first paragraph of page 4 should reflect that the stone church he raterred to is on Archibald rather than f=oothill. Motion: Moved by Rempel, secondr,d by McNiel, unanimously carrTod, to approve the Minutes of October 24, 1984,,as amended. i f CONSENT CALENDAR A. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 12256 - BIOCAL - The development of 20T 4 condominium units an 2. acres of land in the Mediram Residential District_ [ (8 -14 du /ac), located at the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and -, Monte Vista Street - APW 202 - 131 -27, 61, 62. B. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 11869 - ROBER'iS GRUOP - The development of 87 units on � 7 acres of lan io t e M €, ici' m (Residential District (8 -14 du /ac) located at the northeast rorner :Of Archibald and Highland APN 201- 252 -23, 26, 26. C.TTME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 6976 - B.C.G. PROPERTIES - Located on the sout si -e o crow oute, eas a avers .venue �A �Og- 141 -68. D.EWtIRONMENTAL ASSESSMEN'\.AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84-36'--r O'DONNELL. BRIGHAM AND PARTNERS --I i development of twv warehQUSe industrial buildings tataling approximately 78,607 square feet on approximately 6.29 acres of land in Subarea 10 '(General Industrial /Rail Served) located at the northeast corner of 7th Street and Bridgeport Place - APN 229 - 261 -71. f Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by McNiel, unanimously carried, to adopt the consent calendar. PUBLIC HEARINGS E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84-13 - SYCAMORE INVESTMENTS - The development of a 43,992 square foot commercial chapping center with retail shops, fast' food restaurant and gasoline service station /convenience market on 5.44 acres of land in the Neighborhood Commercial District located on the northeast career of Archibald and Bate Line - APN 202- 181 -27. Rick Gomez, City Planner, stated the applicant's desire.to continue this item to the Planning Commission meeting of November 28, 1984. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing.` There were no comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. I Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by McNiel, unanimously carried, to continue Environmental Assessment and Conditional Use Permit 84 -13, Sycamore Investments, to the November 28, 1984 Planning Ca�ttission meeting. i Planning COMMi6Sion Minutes -2 November 14, 191.4 F. 229 - 261 -71. - 8arrye Hanson, Senior Civil- Engineer, reviewed the staff report. Commissioner Rempel stated that there should be a consistency of policies when dealing with rail provisions. He further stated that there are some parcels In the City designated rail served which don't really need rail service, such as this parcel.. Chairman Stout opened the p4?ilic hearing. Jim Westling, representing D', \ ,,nntt, Srigiia�n, and Partners, applicant, advised that the size of the buildings ��n this project preclude rail. He additionally stated concurrence with the staft',roort and " conditions of approval. There were no further comment,,,/ the:rz-rore the public .hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seccjidp� by ChWt' a, unanimously carried, to issue a Negative Declaration and asppt the, 'Resolution approving Environmental Assessment and Parcel Map $595., CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -21 - ALTA LOMA CHRISTIAN CHURCH - A request to convert an existing 1,868 squa ;:-, oot sing le amp y residence to An office for the Alta Loma Christian Church on .25 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District, located at the west side of Sapphire, across from Orange - APN %062- 332 -23, {Continued from October 10 1984 meeting. Tim 3eedle, Senior Planner, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Reverend David McClary, representing Alta Loma Christian Church, explained that the conversion of the single family residence to an office would be a temporary measure until the church membership and funds are available to complete the church's expansion. He furkbp�'advised that the office would be converted back to a single faraily residence at which time it would serve as a residence for a youth minister or other church official. He stated that small group meetings and counseling would be conducted in the house and that no cooking of meals or housing of small children would take place at that location. The following individuals addressed the Commission in support of the Conditional Use Permit. Planing Commission Minutes -3 November 14, 1984 `t J y Roy Millmore 6590 Sapphire Street = Rancho Cucamonga Raymond Walton - Rancho Cucamonga resident Jack Paige - Rancho Cucamonga resident Toni Lopez - 9443 Mignonette Rancho Cucamonga Ron Dacco - Rancho Cucamonga resident Steve Morrison - Rancho Cucamonga resident The following individuals addressed the Commission in opposition to the Conditional Use ?ermit Bill Ungels, 6375 Sapphire, Rancho Cucamonga, stated concern with the traffic on Sapphire, use of the kitchen, tq prepare meals, and the wmusing' young children at the residence. Mr.. Ung'Os' stated that this use does notjconform with the City's General Plan. Mrs. Tolien, '6357 Marble stated that the fence constructet` "around the existing property is an eyesore and that the use is not compatible with a residential area. There wcri no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Commissioner McNiel Stated that he would like staff to take a Loser look at this request. He further stated that, conditions, such as prohibiting the housing of children at the resi Aence, could be placed on the CUP which would mitigate the concerns of adjac6ht resie nts. Commissioner Rempel agreed and advised that the driveway could be required to have temporary removable planters to keep traffic from driving through. He also stated that conditions could be added that would prohibit the kitchen from being used for preparation of meals for the preschool. Commissioner Chitiea suggested that a reasonable time lifiit could be placed on the CUP, such as twenty -four months, since the applicant felt confident that the use would be converted back to a residence within that time. Chairman Stout sated that he had no problems with the concept and felt that staff had been given enough direction t¢lprepare conditions of approval. Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by.Rempel, unanimously carried, to font niue' Conditional Use Permit 84 -21 to the planning Commission meeting of November 28, 1984. Planning Commission Minutes -4 November 14, 1984 s i H. ENVIRONMENTAL AStESSNENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -34 - BENEFICIAL EQUITIES - A proposal for remodeling the storefront facade, additional -- landscaping in the parking area, reconstruction of drive approaches, a minor building addition, and a conceptual building pad for an anticipated drive- through fast food restaurant in an existing Neighborhood Commercial shopping center on approximately 7.8 acres in the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District located at the northeast corner of Carnelian Avenue and Base Line Road - APN 202- 381 -26 & 2843, 36. Linda Daniels, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report: Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. l Greg Hayden, representing the applicant, requested that the Planning: Division conditions of approval be amended to allow the applicant the flexibility to work with staff on a landscaping alternative for the driveway located at the main north /south drive aisle. He stated concurrence with the remaining conditions of approval. Rick Gomez, City Planner, advised that staff would have no objections to working with the applicant on alternatives for this conditioi. There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Rempel proposed that condition 13 requiring a pedestrian opening along the east property line be eliminated. He advised that the tenants may not want an easy access point there for use by the high schooi students... Mr. Hayden stated that he would not object to the removal of this condition. Motion: Moved by Rempel seconded by McNiel, unanimously ran led to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the Resolution approving Conditionai Use Permit 84 -34, with the deletion of condition 13 and an amendment to condition 8 to state that landscaping would be provided to the satisfavctiol- of the City Planner on the north /south drive aisle. 1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMEAT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 334 -32 - WHEAT MOTOR COMPANY - The esta>, ishment of a recreational" vehicle assembly, manufacturing and distribution center in an existing :68,400 square foot industrial building located at the southeast corner of Arrow Highway and Vineyard Avenue on approximately 10.35 acres in Sijbarea 2 General Industrial /Rail Served District of the Industrial Area Specific Plan APN 209- 012 -15. Linda Daniels, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Planning Ccmmssion Minutes -5- November 14, 1984 i Gerry Utt, appl=icant, stated concurrence with the staff report and conditions.: of approval. Chairman Stout asked when the applicant proposed to construct the patio area.' Mr. Utt replied that the company presently does not have a, suffi,ient number of employees to warrant construction of the patio; however, anticipates the hiring of additional employees in May or June of 1985. He advised that he would anticipate the construction of the patio area within two years. Chairman Stout asked if the applicant would be apposed to the inclusion of this two year time frame into the Resolution. Mr. Utt replied that he would not object. Chairman Stout closed the public hearing. Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Chitiea, unanimously carried, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the Resolution approving Conditional Use Permit 84 -32, with an added condition that the outdoor p�.tio area be constructed within two years. The precise designs are to be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee. J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12820 HIGHLAND COMMUNITY COVENANT H - A res1-&CnV5i1 subdivision to create 16 singe fam,77 lots for custom home development in.thO- Low Residential District (2 -4 j du /ac) on about 4.1 gross arrzs `of' land in the Low Residential Development District at the southeast corner of Jasper Street and Highland Avenue - APh 201 - 214 -08. Linda Daniels, Associate Plann �-, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. I William Enns, Pastor of Highland Community Covenant Church, addressed -the Commission statiog concurrence wit1 the staff report and conditions of approval. There were no further cc ments, therefore the public hearing was closed. i Commissioner Rempei addressed Planning condition of approval number 3, requiring an 8 -foot wall adjacent to the proposed Foothill Freeway. He stated that he had a problem with that height and recommended that the wall be a; minimum of 6 feet and the wording "adjacent to thi Wbposid.Foothill Freeway" be eliminated. Planning Commission Minutes -6- - I)vember 14, 1984 Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by Rempal, unanimously carried, to issue,a Negative Declaration and adapt the Resolution approving Environmental Assessment and Tentative Tract 12820 with an amendment to Planning Condition number 3 as proposed by Commissioner R2mpal. K. ENVIRONMENTAL _ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -35 - AACTION COMPANYI4IXIE PRODUCTS - The establishment of a drywall contractor and retail supply :office on 5 acres of land located an the east side of Archibald, north of 6th Street in the Industrial Specific Plan District (Subarea 4) - APN 209. 211 -14. John Meyer, Assistant Planner, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Tom Wolff, representing the applicant, stated concurrence with i<". staff report and conditions of approval. Chairman Stout asked if the applicant would agree to a condition which would prohibit outdoor storage of materials. Mr. Wolff replied that he would not be storing materials outside of the building and would not object to such a condition. There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by Rempel, unanimously carried, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the Resolution approving Conditionel Use Permit 84 -35. L. CONDITIONAL tl5E PERMIT 84 -33 - VALLEY IMPRtVEMENY PROGRAM - A request to operate a driver improvement school in an existing Industrial Park building with a lease space of 1100 square feet on 7,8 acres of lano_ift- the General Industrial District ( Subarea 3) located at 9:687 Arrow Highway APN 209 - 021 -35. Tim Beedle, Senior Planner, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Revie Horton, representing the applicant, stated concurrence with the staff report and conditions of approval. There were no further comnents, therefore the public hearing was closed. Planning Commission Minutes -7- Novemoer 14, 104 Motion Moved -by Renpel, seconded by McNiel, unanimously carried, to adopt the Resolution- approving Conditional Usc Permit 84 -33, 0i . ENVIRONMENTAE ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8828 - BARMAKIAN - The division •)f 11.05 acres of land into parcels in the General Industrial category (Subarea 1) located on the west. Side of Vineyard Avenue, beUr.en Arrow Route and 9th Street - APN 207- 262 -44. Barrye Hanso,b, Senior Civil Engineer, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. There were no comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Motion :: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Ch Wea, unanimously carried, to issue a Negative Declaration and: ;.dope the Resolution approving Parcel Map.8828. N. ENVIRONMENTAL, ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8889 - KAISER, DEVELOPMENT COMPANY consolidation of . acres or, an into r.ie` parcel in the Industrial Park and General Industrial categorles C5ubarea 11 & 12) located on the south side of 8th Street betwien Cleveland and Milliken Avenues APR 210. 082- 18 -27. Barrye Hanson, Senior-Civil Engineer, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Dan Reid, representing the applicant, stated concurrence w;_` the conditions of approval. Oack Sylvester, Newport Beach, addressed the Commis! %ion in support of the project. There were no further comments, therefore the public Sjearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by McNiel, unanimously carried, to issue a Negative Declaration. and adopt the Resolution approving Parcel Map 8889. 9:20 p.m. - Planning Commission Recessed 9:35 p.m. - Planning Commission Reconvened Planning Commission Minutes -8- November 14, 1984 r E r r_ Chairman Stout advised that the fallowing items would be heard cw,.urrently.r.,,. 1 0. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMEW AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 84 -02 HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT - Planning Commission review of public comments and recommendations of the Interim Development Policies for Haven Avenue between 4th Street and Foothill Boulevard. P. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 84 -04 -A HAVEN AVENI O'lT„E LR-AY DISTRICT - A General Pan Amendment from Office to Industrial Park for approximately 40 acres of land located on the west side of Haven;,Avenue, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Highway, in conjunction with the Haven Avenue Overlay District - APN 208 - 331 -01, 12, 13, and i08- 341 -01. Q. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 84 -04 - HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT - A 6evelopment District Ametidment.. from Up- (Office/Professional) to ISP (.Industrial Specific Plan) for approximately 40 acres of land located on the west side of Haven Avenue, in conjunction viith tNe Haven Avenue Overlay District -.APR 208- 331 -01, 12, 23, and 208 341 -01. , R. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 84 -01 - YAWN A�11 ENUL OVERLAY DST C Psi %.. "I . nt to the Industrial Safi Plan to expand the boundary of " Subarea 7 (Industrial Park category) to include approximately 40 acres of land located on the west side of Haven Avenue, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Highway, in conjunction with the Haven Avenue Overlay District -_APN 208,1331 -01, 12, 13, and 208. -341- 01. , Elan Coleman, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report and advised teat staff would need further direction from the Commission in order to prepare the final ordinances and amendments for City Council consideration. Further that these amendments would be presented to the Planning Coar'ssion at their December 12 meeting, prior to review by the City Council. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Dan Richards addressed the Commission in support of the Overlay district'Qand amendments. He referred to the landscaping and streetscape requirements and noted that the area between Arrow and Foothill on the west side had been omitted from the Master Plan and asked if this was an oversight. Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner, replied that this area is not located within the Industrial Specific Plan area and that the landscaping and streetseape r requirements are simply a part of the ISP regulations, Planning Commission, Minutes` -4 ..November 14, 1984 a Mr. Richards ,.iso referred to a one acre restaurant site'witirin the Daon Barton Master -Plan -area and 'expressed concern with the parking and setbatk" requirements on that parcel. He requested that special consideration be given to existing projects within the Overlay District which might have certa,:in constraints. Arnold Anderson addressed the Commission regarding Parcel Map 8345 and stated that a conceptual master plan had been provided for the Commission which depicted the inclusion of the parcel one into the Overlay District,. - Rick Gomez, City Planner, advised that the issue for the Commission to decida was that if the 351 feet is an appropriate location for the boundary and should that portion be office professional with the balance designated as multiple family. Bob Clark requested that the Commission reconsider the motion made, at their previous meeting to r::,' change the standards for parcels immediately adjacent to the railroad tracks on 8th Street. Further, that the Commission consider uses not quite as stringent as other areas on Haven Avenue. Jack Finley asked if the master plan is conceptual at this point." Chairman Stout explained that the master plan is not being reviewed at this point and is only intended to indicate a maser pian could work, no, necessarily this particular master plan, and is conceptual only. - There were no further comments, therefore'the, public hearing was closed — The Commission made the following amendmits to• the Haven Avenue Overlay District Text. Chairman Stout requested that language be added to the Applicability section on page one which would state that development immediately adjacent to the Haven Avenue Overlay District should consider compatibility with the Overlay District through a master plan process. It was the consensus of the Commission that this statement be added. Chairman Stout requested that appointed officials be added to the f4irst- paragraph of page 2, under the goals section. This was added by consensus. Following discussion regarding the permitted, ancillary, and conditional uses it was the consensus of the Cemmission that the following amendments be made: Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Services relocated to the Second slot on the list and Eating and Drinking Estabishments moved to the last place. B =usiness Supply Retail Sales and Services and Business Support Services were removed from ancillary uses and placed under permitted uses with an aestrisk designating them as ancillary uses. Additionally, ancillary use designations under conditional uses were recommended for Convenience Sales and Services, Food and Beverage Sales and Personal Services. Planning Commission - Minutes -1Q- November 14, 1984 L It was the consensus of the Commission that language be ';added to the Master Planned Development section, C.1, to require 'a statement addressing thVii the project meets the intent of the Haven Avenue Overlay District_ Additionally; language was added to section C.4 to include a variety of Styles. Further, the addition of citrus and grapevine plant material consistent with the City's heritage was added to section E.4. i i Language was added to the goals statement under Open, Space and Pedestrian Environment, Section F, to include the promotion of a campus, like setting. Additionally, kiosks ;;ere added to Pedestrian Facilities, section F.3. Also, Architecture, Section G.2., was modified to state tha:. variations in architectural styles, construction methods and materials for ancillary uses may be permitted only where the architecture is exemplary. Following these recommendations for amendments to the Haven Avenue Overlay District text, the following motion was made.: Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Chit ea, unanimously carried, to I continue Environmental Assessments and Industrial Specific Plan; - Amendment 84-02, General Plan.Amendment E4 -04, Development Districi Amendment 84 -04, and Iodust -ial Specific Flan Amendment 8�1.01,''all pertaining to the Haven Avenue Overlay District, to the Planning Commission meeting of December 19, 1984. - Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by McNiel, unanimously carried, to continue past the 11 :00 p.m. adjournment time. AD BUSINESS S. BOAR'S HEAD UPDATE Per 11anning Cumm-ssion request for an annual update on this Conditional Use Permit, Rick Gomez, City, Planner, reported that the Boar's Head Restaurant has been closed for several months due to a fire. Chairman Stout invited public comment. �d "'- -- Larry Arcinage, owner of V e Boar's Head, stated that the restaurant had been closed since May and he was anticipating reopening it iii December. He further stated that he proposed to change the nacre and the theme of the restaurant. Mel Fetrel, Rancho Cucamonga resident, stated the noise which was a prohlem when the Boar's Head existed had ceased since the closure of the restaurants' therefore it would not indicate that Bob's 3ig Boy restaurant was also a contributor as discussed previously. He further stated that he hoped that 14r. Arcinage did reopen, it would be a family type restaurant as originally proposed. Planning Commission Minutes -11- November 14,`1984 y L Roberta Futrell, Rancho Cucamonga resident, thanked the staff and Commission for listening to the Wic_ erns of residents. Motion: Moved by Mcliel, seconded by 'Rempell-V unanimously carried, to continue. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS T. USE DETERMINATION. SENIOR CITIZEN CONGRETAT£ RESIDENTIAL PROJECT LOWED KI BASE LINE ROAD, EAST OF LIAfiEZ IMF = €CE PROF IOtiAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Tim Beedle, Senior Planner, reviewed the staff report and advised that the applicant was seeking the Commissions "s concurrence that this particular site would be suitable for a senior citizens project. A representative of California Retirement Villas reviewed the conceptual site plan and explaind the operations of the proposed project. Upon review, the Commission determined that the use,..-ould be cospatible at the location of Base Line Road, east of Carnelian, and advised the applicant to proceed with a fornal Conditional Use Permit application. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by McNiel, unanimously carried, to continue. U. SELECTION OF ONE COMMISSION MEMBER TO THE ETIWANDA DRAINAGE PLAN ADVISORY I COMMITTEE P:sl. Rougeau, Senior Civil., Engineer, advised that a Commissioner was to be selected to serve on the ftiwanda Drainage Plan Advisory Com;aittee. Commissioner Rempel was selected to serve on this Comcittee. J I l Planning Comission Minutes -12- November 14, 1984 J i �1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA MONGA T STAFF REPORT, g DATE: January 9, 1985 TO: Planning;; Commission FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krail Engineering Technician SUBJECT: R8QUEST FOR TIME EXTENSION - PARCEL MAP 3383 BANKS Located on the north side of Base Line Road, west of East Avenue Parcel Map 3383 was tentatively approved by Punning Commission on January 26, 3983 for the division of -5 acres of land into 4 parcels within the Low- Radium Residential District located an the north side of 6asa tine Road, west of East Avenue This tentative approval is valid for a period Of two years and with appropriate extensions, an additional two years tulle may be granted. Mr.. Banks is requesting an extension of time to camplete the final mar; and street improvement plans, RECJMMENDATI0N . It is recoumended that the Commission adopt the attached resolution approving a one-year extension of time for Parcel Map 3983. The new expiration date wilT be January 26, 1986. Ssubmic ed, Attachment I i ,l i i �ar�cs cSc 11tGhic ATTORNEYS AT LAW j ' 9S'C"STREET SUITE 106 JAMES BANKS, JR. "' �- POST OFFICE BOX 278 - THOMAS B. RITCHIE ' 2 . UPLAND, CALIFORNIA 92786 {7f�! 961.0931 16 October 1984 2; Engineering and Plahningj Departments City of Rancho cuadmongaF yirox Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 l Re:. Parcel Mart 33.3 Gentlemen and Ladies: I want to apply for an eixtension of time within which to make the improvement required in the approval of `my Parcel Map. � incere Adak :,TAMES BAN r JBJ:prm �r NE lecfana t •Ig ,a+O. � 4ti � v � K . �� •�'� rj � rr..c � �I. . t , ur�• e i ' � ` e.lr•H.an. waw.r - f rs KN � _ ..� i ,I PROJECT a P.4 3' S - WE _ I L p H e L:C , �N @ II MlR3iRY I .u; ! p, - bjL i ar.caa u.i.,> yr.- N 3 -t easfic to I •ot :�+ ••� ' IyIi .:Pr title' Ask c� ' c CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA PARCC— L MAP g3 3 :A qp FM a ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINI'T'Y MAP ) -L2) i CZ o � U: c O i TEtVFATIVE ' SURVEYOR . y IRCEL MAP Ng , J83 A OWNER DAN D. IEL F-74NC /S ES BANKS ✓R 4315 F /FTY- E /GHTH ST. IN M CI rY OF f�.�' CHO CUCAM NGA !3181 `WCTQRIA SAN DIEGO, CA. 92115 /MARCH, 1980 ETIWANDA, CA. 917j9 L714) 381- 093�—' ¢` SOUTHERN PACIFIC R.R. TRACKS NB9°563Q'E NORTH LINE OFLOT 10 T?881`_- 1695 8 333.03 --� --f `T7�89�23'E 333. �. �-►� WIRE FENCE U.. TR tn- I SMRAGE pc� R =50' BLo G. o cq L =126 °52,`!2" �ni L= 110.72 �'" /26'ELC • 1 � � rFi ` Ri50 L71 AC, O lij I `'•'s� L= 32.18` —~ - W _ % �.� N89'4815 Q� ti) o►sm - D U � p "'--- 'o v i7�ER OF DED/CAT1��✓2AC Q Q - -� a SHEDS �sA U N89 98/5 E 3Q3.1 w Q o °- 3 a n, 2 � 0.92A"� ttl tu N &9°48%5`E 3Q317' 30' EX /ST. 6 =90 °11;00" RES/DaE� ( 0 L= 31.48, 111111--------------- ��� --��� T=2006 OAAC O N89s48 %5'E UNlMPROVEp ROW D6U/C,4T /JN -�- ' 1V139 °48'15 E SOUTHLIATCFLOT10 ` OFFER OFLxG 77MV GENERAL /MFORW R/Ol) >•& UT/uT /ES: GAS WATER TELEPM�NE AND ELECTR/C /TY NOS iy SE THE REC ST CMV-- h1�6,I A eD/ATELY TO YXE WEST A Rr � !N BE EXTENDED 70 SERVE TH /S PROfiRTY A-, NECESSARY. SLif'AGE DIF Z: 4L R3 BE ELY CESSPOOL AW SEPT/CTAIVK, USES: SEVERAL LARGE EUCALTW TREES ARE ON PROPOSED DARCEL 4 AND ROWS OF MED /Ld1f TO LARlsE EUC'3 AhE ALOAG THE NORTi! AIM Sp!!IH BA40ER6 OF ME fl4TY AGE: DRAIhIAGE SLA°E /S APPROX. 2 % ALMOST !X/E SOUTH !N L'IRECAO'V wiJH TaE RAILROAD !AV THE N0.47H STOPPING WATEig FLOWING SOUTH FRr 7M ENPERING THE PROPERTY. 'I�YJ�: SED LAk7 USE: EVENTUAL CONSTRUCTbA/ OF SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES. /3UIL-D" SET- BAGKS TO BE A MINIMUM <i1F' 25`FROM ThE fY?OPOSED EA51 STREET OEDK»C1IGkY LIIV. VL^ /N/TY MAP NO SC AL E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAbIONGA STAFF DEPORT DATE: January 26, 1983 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Paul A. Reugeau, Senior Civ21 Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMEKi' AND PARCEL MAP 3383 - BANKS The division of acres of 1anU into 4 lots .-ithin the R -1 zone located approximately 660' west 3f East Avenue APN 227 - 131 -29 (continued froin Planning Commission meeting of November 10, 1982) PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The above described parcel map is being re- sunmitte y Mr. James ants, to divide, five acres of land into 4 lots, the smallest being .71 acre. Approval wa:; previously given by the City Engineer on May 12, 1980. This approval expired on f!nvember 12, 1981. This site is pt�!sently undeveloped., To the west is an existing residence, to the north and east is vacant land and to the south is an existing nursery. The land is zone R -1 w,th a, General Plan designation of 2 -4 dwelling units per acre, The proposed Etiwanda Specific Plan shows the area as low- medium (4_8 divelling units per acre). The same plan places the site outside of an equestrian area, but a comnwnity trail is proposed along the Southern Pacific Railroad. PREVIOUS PROJECT: The SubJivision proposed lies considerably removed from the nearest pub] is street. Wcen this is the cases Planning Commission policy requires that a dedicated and partially improved public street be provided between the property and an existing public street (see atta Wdd" resolution). The parcel map covering this property was originally approved in 1980, under the discretion given the City Engineer, due to the requirement placed on that maV to improve a drainage couvie tp Base Line. It was felt r that the improvements necessary for the drainage would also have prided an acceptable access until further development in the area provided a more suitable street pattern. A Negative Declaration was granted in April 1980, At that time, the Interim General Plan designation was "Windrow Residential ", 0.1 to 3 units per acre. ANALYSIS: The Commission is now considering resubmission of this map under a proposed Specific Plan which has designated the area with a land use of Low - Medium (4 -8 units per acre) and which has further developed its future circulation needs. The attached vic4n;ty map shows a backbone street pattern which best addresses the constraints existing in the area but intended as a "master plan ", it is not L -1 ,� _ El Planning Commission Ff Report ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS, LIT AND PARCEL MAP 3383 January 26, 1933 Page 2 The proposed subdivision conflicts with the pending Specific Plan in two respects: First, the designated land use is entirely different; Secondly, the existing access and drainaCe paths do not coinciae with the best locations for a future street. physically and environmentally, the proposal could be acceptable with r, access as provided in the recommended! conditions of approval, Such aii access would be temporary, however, and would be vacated in the future when a street system in the proper location becomes available „. With respect to planning, the proposal should be carefully considered because the conflict with the Specific Plan land use is significant, but the recent subdivison to the aaest is a duplicate of the one being proposed and provides a balanced neighborhood centered on the cul -de -sac street. The possibility remains, however, that any of the existing or ,proposed lots could be further subdivided on an individual basis with no opportunity for master planning. It appears that this potential problem is limited to the 10 acres accessed by the cul -de -sac. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Also attached for your review and consideration is Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Upon completion and review of the Initial Study and field investigation, Staff found no adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the proposed subdivision. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hea'Hng have been sent to surrounding, property owners and placed in the Daily ka;,ort Newspaper. Posting at the sit. has also been completed. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Commission consider the information given in the foregoing report together with public input during this and previous hearings and take one of the following actions: 1. Approve the tentative map as submitted, which calls for a 40' public road dedication to Base Line, understanding that the road would have t -6i _ superseded in the future. I.a. Same, with a 30'offer of dedication. 2. Approve the tentative map with the condition that only a pr1 °rate paved access easement to the property will be sufficient until t'�e future streets are available. 3. Deny the map if conflict with the pending Specific Plan is found to be, unmitigated by the neighboring similar subdivision *RR,espetf submi ted, Attachments: Map City Engineer's 'Report Initial Study Resolution r 604L IVX!;MA(1VX0':*5 0..t/4C iigso'.3rr OX a. i 33-07 _ A RMSOMMr O MM PLANE= C@SMLSSMK Cr MEE . C17 OF ECHO CDC "-& ESrAzLISUIW SUBDMSrXn ACCESS IngrSOVERM porscr. WHEME S, the Pia -/Ang Commission of the City of mho Cucamonga wishes to discourage VYie proliferation of private wed streets; M& WHEREAS, xt is mecessary to establish f 13 policy- guideline to Inform ps�opertr c of the City goals. , MU5MEM, BE IS RESOLVED AND EMBLLgHM, thzt as a_cooditiou � Of appr9val t any Parcel Map, Parcel � Waiver, i'tact or 2rs I,fn+e 7 6dinstaeat an applicant shall base access to a foray dedicated o% aaiatatn ei City street. M-re deMeatiorts and Improve s do not exist, 20A appUc,=t shall, obtain a ninfnom of forty (40) feet of de4ication and issc„ ooee with twenty -six (25) feet of paveent needed street frontage to rzacb the nearest Raintaned City street. Variations frow this Policy wili regsire approval of the City Engineer of the City of 12acho-03camonga, subject to appeals to the Planning Comm ssiou. i APFROV A AJkD AiiMrED 'THIS 241h DU s;T JAMABT, 1979- PLAWFING C@MISSIM UP THE Cin OF RIAMM CD & I ATTEST----.. Secretary of the Planning Commission. I 2, Jack Lam, Secret m-y of the Planning Cow&"ion of the City of Rancisa C l do Hereby certify that the faregairsS- RaSO1rsL ors sr�g duly and s" l'' and b1' rise P3aaniug CoErissiota of the City ofr'�' a regr•- seating +af tin; P2 -M-UM Commission held on the 24th of Manua at ivy the foliowi:tg vote to -wit; t3": 1479, AYES: COEMISSIOIGMS: C4RCIA" ;' TOLSTpg= JORM. zwn WES: {:OMEESSiO sus: ME ASSENT: t isSIW -E3s: DAHL RESOLUTION NO. 83 -09 V A RESOLUTiJ;` 11F THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO4GA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER I 3383 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 3383), LOCATED AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF SO115HERN PACIFIC RAILROAD, WEST OF EAST AVENUE WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 3383, submitted by James Banks, Jr. and consisting of 4 parcels, Tocatrd at the south side of Southern Pacific Railroad, west of East Avenue, being a siviSion of .a Portion of Lot 10, Flock K of the preliminary map of the Etiwanda Colony Lands per map recorded in Book 2, page 24 of Maps of the County of SanY Bernardino, State of California- and WHEREAS, on June 7, 1982, a fGrmal application was s ubmitted requesting. review of the above - described Tentative Map; and - WHEREAS, on January 26, 1T'83, the Planning .C,vmmission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above- described map. FOLLOWS:. NOW, THEREFORE,, THE RANCHO CUCAMOYGA PLANNING COMMISSION P SOLVED AS SECTION S: That the following. findings ha,e` been made: L, That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with t` reneraT Plan. 3. That '"fie site is ph"SicalV sui•tahle for the proposed development,, 4. That the proposed subdivision 4ind improvements will :_.. not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have aduerso affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse environmental impacts. and a Negative !leciar,ttion is issued tin January 26, 1983. i SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel MaprNo. 3383 is approved subject to the conditions of the City Engfaeer`s Report i:erta-ining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1983. PLANNING COMMISSION DF THE CITY OF RANCHO.CUCA,IiONGA Resolution No. Aj -09 Page 2 �. BY: _J e €€ Ey iCtn ai' , n ATT� fit' rt Al. .Secretary the Planning Commission W, I, JACK IAM, Secretary of thE" Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, day- hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly int�pduced, Passed, and adopted by the Planning Commisj,-jOn of the City of Ranche,Pucamonga, at a regular, meeting of the Planning CcInission on the 26th d ?,/'of January, 19aL by the following vote -to -wit: AYES; COMWISSIOURS: MCNIEL, BARKER, REMPEL, STOUT, KING NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NGyR ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS:lvaiiE. Aft l - i CIT'r OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY ENGINEER'S REP-ORT FILED BY: tames Banks,Jr. Pkt 3383 TENTATIVE MAP N0. LOCATION: North of Base Line, between East and DATE FILE on _ D: resubmitted 8/82 Etiwanda AVEnues HUMBER OF LOTS: 4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portion of Lot 10, 81k "K" of RECEIPT NUMBER: Etiwanda Colony Lands -� FEE: 3230.00. ZONE:_ R.7 TENTATIVE MAP PREPARED BY: dp & MrS1ev _ GROSS ACREAGE: 4 acres ADDRESS: 1033 E. Rosemead Ct. MINIMUM LOT AREA: 0.71 acre Ontario, CA 91764 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 102 ft. RECORD OWNER(S) ADDRESS PHONE r James Banks, Jr. 13,181 Victoria, Rarcho Cucamonga 31739 981 -0931 I I REPORT OF THE CITY ENGINEER Dedications I. Dedication by final map of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary X easements as shown on the tentative map. 2. Dedication by final map of the following missing rights -of -way on the following streets: in, additional feet on Pecan Avenue --30° addxWkk feet on ak Street Rdkridi�XRXF (XRX! #XhijiSX}FedX3` Other 3. Rights of Ve11cuiar'4ccess shall be limited as follot�s; 4. Street v. -�.,on required for: .ra^ t� at - reets`Mision required for: m 6. The following perimeter intersections require realignment as follows: TEUTATIVE MAF' =:0. 3383 ' � Page 3 _x 21• Permits from Ether agencies will be required as follows: A. Caltrans, for: 8, Cits X C. County - Dust Abatement District: D. D.I.S"Trenching Permit if any trenches are over 5' deep: E. Cucamonga County Water District: F. Other-, ---., 22. If only a portion of this Map '.s recorded, adjustments shall be made to pro- vide for Iwo -way traffic and Parking on .all affected streets. 23. The following lots appear to be substandard in either frontage, depth or area and should be corrected on the final map: 24, All corner lots :shall have a corner radius. at the right -of -way line in ac�;,rd ance with the City of Rancho Cucat!anga standards, 2S. A Parcel Map.shall be recorded prior to the first Phase subdivision to prevent the creation of an unrecognized parcel located 26. The ` boundary of the Tentative Map needs c.arifrcatTan as foliot!s: 27. l'he border shall be shown to centerline of exstin ~meter streats, or title explanation required. Parcel hiap Waiver y 28. Information submitted at the time of application is / is not sufficiElt to support the issuance of a waiver of Parcel Map Certificate, according to requirements of the State Map Act and local ordinances. rIUS 1X� >s�AUSU (Bonding is required prior to MRecording for Draina e DRAINACE �l:Fl]4XR�7i}S�lk' g ---�3 29. Proposed subdivision falls within those areas indicated as subject to flood- ing under the National Flood Insurance Program. This subdivision will be subject to the provisions of that program and Ordinance No. 24. 30. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall along the entire north .pro- perty line may be required to divert sheet runoff to streets. Such flotr may be required to go wader sidet -calks through culverts. 31. If crater surface is above 0P of curb, 30" walls shall be required at the back Of the sidewalk at ?11,downstream curb returns. 32. Culverts required to be Zonstructed across streets at following locations: 33. uroadfscale hydrologic studies W1 be required to assess imP3c o, 7rtcreased x 34. UNNI l approved drainage facilities to dr &.i -n rAt- �- gxi�t4na fl_oudina �,¢rra +;,.� _ - ce to Base Line acid eliminate ___- - v, ~Base tine Road, RCE 20 I RESK "AJON NO. x A RESOLUTION OF THE RANa!Q— .C6,AM6NGA, PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING THE TIME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 3' 83 WHEREAJS a request has been filed for a_time extension for above -odescribed project, pursuant to Section 1.501.8.2 of Ordinance 28 -8, the 11�e Subdi�,'Isien Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning `CommieSior. conditionally approved above - described tentativcz parcel map on_ January, 26, 1983, the SECTION 1; The Rancho Cucwifonga Planning Commission has made following Findings: the A. That current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions .mike It uctreas4nable to ,,huild at t1lis time; B. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be consistent witl the intent of the 0 'relopment Code. t. That there has been no significant oranges to the ckaracter of the' area in which the project is located thkt would cause the project to become conforming or �. inconsistent With current standards. SECTfJN 2; The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a time extension fora Parcel MaR ,RiLation 3383 Jamos.8ank.s Ja�'tuary 26, 1985 APPROVED AND AOOPTEO:THIS 26TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1985. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANI,r6 CUCAMUNGp, $v. Dcnnis L. Strut, Chairman ATTEST: ,. Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City -of' Rarf.! o Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of.the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of .January, 1985, by the following vote --to -wit: =' AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS RBSERT., COMMISSIONERS: R ;. s F f 1 i 1, jj_a l t - T "c CITY OF RANCHO CUCAbZONGA �a��cAnra,�,c9 MEMORANDUM 1 Date: January 3, 1:85 O Q F z Toe Planning Commission � tj �4 1977 From: Dick Mayer, Park project �ordihator Subject: REVIEh OF THE CONCEPTUAL PLAN FOR TERRA VISTA 17ORTHWEST NEIGHBORHOOD BA'PX AND CONN>?CPOR TRAIL CONSENT CALENDAR HACKGRI UND: Terra Vista Northwest Neighborhood park is the first of neighbor400d parksites to be dedicated and developed as developer park dedication requirements of the Terra Vista planned Community as provided for in the Approved Terra. Vista Park Implementation clan. Consisting of 5 acres, the proposed parksite will include a fully developed softball field, individual and small group picnic facilities, a children's play apparatus area, a restroom, parking for 2D vehicles, walkways and landscaping. Part of the walkway system will include a segment of a connector trail extending south from Terra Vista Parkway and adjacent to the westerly perimeter of tte park. Once off the parksite the trail trill continue. in a southerly direction the west perimeter of the neighboring property proposed for development as an elementary school be Central School District and Lewis Homes of California, the developer. In developing the plan for the park site and t,rai2 staff worked closely with representatives of the Central School.Disrtict and Lewis Homes. Consistent with the goals of the City': General Plan, the resultant plan 'Was prepared to take advantage of joint use opportunities for park and school users of the combined athletic fields and ether activities areas at the park /school complex. The conceptual plan for the Terra vista Northwest Neighborhood park and associated connector trail has'oeen reviewed by the park Development COmsaission with a recommendation for City Council approval. Upon review by the Planning Commission, the plan will be submitted to City Council with the recommendation of both the park Development Commission and the Planning Commission. RECOM1tENDATIONe That the Planning Commission review in tte conceptual plan for Terra Vista Northwe>t Neighborhood Park and Connecty, Trail and forward to .the City, . f 1 == 1 Council.. with a recommendation for Attachment I iF ITEM 6 'bR +' 1 � V .;f IA K AN . g g P 41STA X1413014140 -- -- 4 9 cnt r r BRA MMA NORTHWEST � fi NEIGHBORHOOD PAW __ ��� �= �.'6�� S' is :.{ 2 A •� J„L�.�^jd„ [ _ ' • _ } ., �w'•reyQ� �" .jlp F�' - � Y..s �.. YISTA SCFi00L T' � !ff c -et•r �. x. > • , r � lip C7ilr vit.l Ire TRAIL SY� iEt4t WIDE CONCRETE WALK k Y. SCHOOL PARKING DRAWACE SWALE • Z�.4 r •t lrSM SS • Ns .� 'NI.�- Y.y . t t O CITY OF R01,CHO CUCAMONGA �, 1 FF REPORT U >. DATE: January 9, 1985 isn TO Planning Commission t 1 FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer 8Y: Barbara Krali, Engineering Technician ,, SUBJECT:. ENVIRGgMENTAL ASSESSMENT ACID PARCEL ,MAP 8842 LEWIS �,HOMES OF CALIFOi�-N;A - A division of 5.00 acres of, la ci`into parcels within the Terra Vista Planned Corrinunity '.ocated on th == south side of nrra Vista Parkway, east of Sprucz Avenue (APN 1077- 091 -02) i I. PROJECT' AND SITE DESCRIPTION: j A. Action Reuu?sted: Approval of Parcel Map, B. Purposes To divide 15 acres of land, into 2 parcels. Parcel 1 is io be the site of a City Park and Parcel 2 is a_ proposed school. site. C. Location: South side of Terra Vista Parkway, east of Spruce Avenue Ti the Terra Vista Community Project:- D. Parcel Size: Parcel' i - 5.00 acres. Parcel 2 - 10.00 acres. E.- Existing Zoning Proposed park and elementary school. F. Existing Land Use: Vacant., G. Surrounding Land Use: Borth Tentative Tract 12402 (apartments). South - Vacant. East - Vacant. West - Tentative Tract 12365 (condominiums). H. Surrounding General Plan and Development Code Desia"nations: North - Medium High 2Q -24 u Residential. South - Medium High (20` -2h du /ac) Residential. East Lour Medium (4 -8 du /ac) Residential. - -- Yest - Medium, C v -24 auTac) - f ' ITE'f C � ti i xI I. Site Characteristics:: The site slopes approximately 3% fr-gm north to south. There are existing vineyards on a portion of the s�iE,e. The remainder of the site is vacant. - !� II. ANALYSIS: Lewis Development Company is submitting, this Parcel Map to create sites for the proposed City Park and a proposed stbooi site within the Terra 'Vista Community. A conceptual park plan to #e constructed on Parcel I is on tonight's agenda ft, ,,review. Plans for- f h °;:; school site are not aiailab}e at this time. -r -11. ENVIRO''WRENTAL REVIEW: Also attached for your review and consideration is Part' I of tpe; Initial Study, as completed by the applicants Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the env *ironmental checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Upon completi ^n and review of the Initial Study and field investigation, Staff found nt adverwa, impacts on the environ;T�nt as a result of the proposed subdivision. IV. t'ORRESFONOENGEi Notices 'of Public [fearing have been sent to surrounding ' property owners and;;- plaeed'in the O`aily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also bren`iompleted: V. RECOMMENDATION: It Is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt the attached t 'solution c, ,ind[tionaT;y approving Tentative Parcel Map 8842' and authorizing''�he issuance cf t- Necative Declaration. Respectfully submitted, L8HcD as Attachments: Mao Tentative & Vicir'41y Resolution City Eng#neer's Repor�' Initial Study i TENTATIVE I VE sHEE2 i OF i $HEFT PARCEL JPAAP NO. 8842 IN THE !CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFOI 411A - i[YD0 a 6DioRiStOD W A fOV.•ltri W tAr ]. u c iDa ix tiATZ i0, 3SCxr It tac ' CST) OP 11a6130;Dt:,ypK . �) W lAa aaMAlpieO. MATa OP CALt70utiAr AD 14 MN ttIDI1D4 ID DxOa ]i OP aA75. rAQD a) Alp f)j. SD TI:T WrI[[ OP tBT Q10KT ti(DIm4 W SAID CWRP Sip TaAT rOKtdl W ttTTI00 lr TOwiM! 1 SOVCN. iAlOt. 7 t2ST. SAD KeluuOivo y.01l0ita. At a�11a ON tiCAtOafJ1 7lVlt LN9. CTRAK•S footr3ssoY, as rte >tk atmwcr iD fool i.,riura. rAR t. to t8 oKlcT or aaa ��'SiWM4 OP iAID �. 2 LOTS SEPTEIdam 7920 15.9 ACHES it ` 1, ! TRACT AM. c n - a ; I,--_ 'jISM•9DLa•Ir fYMOJ � • a)m• VICINtSY NAP "' TR4CT A /C. 1136 p. DgIGAl.?' AVO10i "0.`G r. o. foz m Wuao, u !t)u ,K Isla io1¢s n ncatvlwxa ass w. •� a.•p'.. t' • a•A!•�c)• SW1rA1e AV4Vi DrSJIm. Q- xrDiala 2171! rogp. Intl fl Yaf)1. r IEb1 Gy i•� /% L•/P�tx• �IS.>:>� rY/ C� T•Ia.N' [2 i ASSOCIAt4• SDC. OT 8Aa i[MARDSXO QiM[t Sts f0. M001ftAID a•,a1R `1 tS6 avxtc las fhb rni Dncxrr- eocxarnl r4mKMix1 x. r)u4r IDisc -s w,riuotm ssa^mxtr. . oatT aar4 a xR. T. IJO DStt VAPJa' CIIR3)G .za4A.n. ltil sAa iaWllgIf0 l0M1. I. tali TitC COYTA3.lx K.O OMtSa AC6P. aNR• CV0AI1gKJ11 PJ. I)i!I i. SMS t11ACi C011tATat1 awlp� ®. Z17Sa, SY7 -x517 3, it4'111A0T tORAt>a TG'SIlID fQi3. f. taiY tlAC: tDClaieY ICY ow Syr. Of �1 DOIOITID 1. tM• 7. a�utsronx:i Qcl+rtna, t. CXloD119 ra011 A41w rfoiC;. vca olsnsa, s7�a r�7.ai'raDi°!a°'a,m•. •7, sAa i1T1WYxq, Cy " I +ItI !ti•llel :. Ct2CiKtr NI xUKa SiCD� _ hD i9. mtl !al -17u tsssas� -a' r.c. cm. smm Dcwic +_ r_ a 1 •'. 1]Dnc" ara �, laltraDi[1 efo�aAriO ArfiOi. j1R. t1te.lia �SalilmiC m. /q) 1i)+rtTt -a• FnCR �•S � Illti. 1t }:r11 Y� 'jISM•9DLa•Ir fYMOJ � • a)m• VICINtSY NAP "' lu CiTY OF RANCHO COOAMONIGA ENGINEERING DIVISION it ,!a �_ VICINITY MAP GENERAL ENVIRON APPLICATION INNIAL STUDY PART I For all projects requiring enviropmental review, this farm must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Planning Division staff will prepare Part II of thy• Initial Study' and make recommendations to Planning Commission.., The Planning Commission wi?1 make tine of three determinations: (1) The project -rill have no si- ificant cnvironmental impact and a Negative De^laration will be filed, 6) ThE prcjeet will have a significant environmental impact and ar Er4ironmental Impact Report will be prepared, or (3) An additional info ~:7ation report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information :: ncerning the Proposed project. _ Date Filed:_ November 21, 1984 Project Title: Terra Vista'North?,est Neighborhood Part. Applicant's NamF, Address, Telephone. Commune serva.Ces Department, City of Rancho Cucamonga, P. o. Box 807, Rancho1Cucamong�a, CA 517'10 - 984 -1451 Name, Address, Telephone of Person To Be Contacted Concerning this Project: Far City: Dick Mayer, 989 -1851 For Lewis- John Melcher, 985 -0971 Location of Project: Terra Vista Planned Community, south side of iarra k�ia Parkway ±552' east of the centerline. of spruce Avenue Assessor's Parcel No.t 1077- 091 -02 (ptn -) -- List other permits necessary from local, regional, ,tate and federal agencies and the agency issuing such permits: CCWD - sewer and eater oan Bernardino County soils Erosion'& Dust Control D stYiCt —.dust abatement.._ - C7 BE, JtCT D"SCRIPTIby Proposed Oe or proposed project;: A Public neighborhood park including play, picnic, athletic trtas1, parking, and xestrdom facilities. Acreage of project area and square footage of existing and proposed buildings, if any, -00 acres to include a YertrOOM building of- apprOXIMate y 400 s ,ft. Describe the environmental settin of the project site including information on topography, 'soil sta,,z7it— y; plants (trees), land animalsi any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, land use of surrounding propertfes, and L .. description of any existing structures sheets) and their use (attach necessary The site has regular topography i2� -3� north-sou t'h 'slope) and stable, well - drained soil. There are no significant flow, fauna, cultural, hisFcricalr or scenic aspects, per the Terra 'rlsta master y:IR.` Altai: tnents a,.e under ^~ construction, immediately to the west, south, and northzaest of the site- other surrounding property is now in vineyard use-but wi.,'L be;developed , for residential and school - e under existing zon!ng. Therd are nn,a ~� _xi •r`linc* structures or trees,on the site. Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although inJiv'idually scull, environmental impact may as a whole have significant This project is part of tile Terra Vista Planned Community, for which a master EIR has already been certified. - " ---- -- l NIL _ IHIS PROJECT: YES NO _. 1. ,reati a subsitantial'change in around contours? 1 a 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise of produce vibration or glare? x 3. Create a substantial change in demand far municipal services (police, fir:;, water, a.h!ige, etc.)? x 4. create changes in the existing Zoning or Genera., k;an designations? x i S. Remove any existing trees? Hoes many?� S. Create the need for u ",_' or disposal of potentia,ly I hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or e'.-plosives? x Explanation of any YES answers above (attach adoitional:aheets if necessary):, . Estimate the amaunt of sewage and solid waste materials this oroject will gerizrate daily: Minimal cannot estivate* 8• Estimate the number of auto and truck trips generated dRily by this project: Appzox. 30 trips AIIT� 9. Estimate thc, amount of grading (cutting and filling required for Ws prcject, in cubic yards: APprex. 13,000 cY* _ 10. If the project ilir-r,vea -the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next paye. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements _d above and in the attached exhibits present the data and infcrma! -ion required for this initial evaluation to the best'of my ability, an! that the facts, statements, and +nformation �vesented are true and correct to the best 'of roy knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made oy the Planning Division. LEWIS HOMES aF CALIIF.ior,1ZTP. Date: 11 -21 -84 Signature �s. Titles Authox d, Agent *Thew and all other environmental impacts have already been evaluated in the master ETR Zor the 2e--ra vista "jar ,ted Community. KSIDENT -j L CONSTRUCTION The followir infonnation should bR provided to th. City of Rancho Cucamonga Piannirn Division in ide''der to aid the school district in a=G°ssing their ability to accommodate the proposed residential development,; Developers their required to seck..a letters from ?7�i. school district for accommodating the increased number or students prior,ta issuance, of building Hermits. Name of De.elo� ,r and Tentative Tract No Specific Location of Project: S�µASE I }`RASE 2 PHn F 3 !H—AS-E-_4 7�TAL -- -: 1. Number of sin-le, family units: 2. Number of multiple family units: 3. Date proposed to begin construction: ". Earliest date of occupancy: Modeler and # of Tentative S. Bedrooms PrSce Range 1 : t • RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIrZRNIA, AP°ROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER S (TENTATIVE SOUTH 3IDE O OF TERRA VIS A 4 PARKWAYAND EAST OF ON 5PRUCE AVENUE WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Nur --r 8842, submitted by Lewis Development Company and consisting of 2 parcels, located'Zi the south side or Terra Vista Parkway ad east of Spruce Avenue, being a division of a Portion of Lot 1 of Tract 2202 as recorded is Book 34, Pages 67 and 67 1,�2; and WHEREAS, on November 11, 1984, a formal application was submitted requaest•ng review of the above - described Tentative Map; and WHEREAS, on January 9„ 1985, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above- described map. FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE„ TPE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING GOM14ISSION RESOLVED AS SEC ION 1: That the following Midinya have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement cf the propost�:i suLdivisiotn is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That he site is physicai7y suitable for the ' f proposed development. i 4. That the proposed subdivision and im- rovements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on ebutting property. 1 environmen�ai Impacts ndta riegat ve3Declarati Declaration ongJanu January adverse ��' January 9, 1985. SECTION 3: That 7.antative Parcel Map No. 8842 is approved subject to the recommended Conditions of Approval pertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1985. r; PLANNING CV,4MISSION OF THE CITY 01' RANCHO CUCAM0NGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, — +Chairman ATTEST: - Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary C' _q CITY OF RANCHO CUCAP40NGA fi;ECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL LOCATION: South side of 1,erra Vista Pkw TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP: 8842 east of Spruce Avenue ...DATE FILED: November 11 1984 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A ortion of Lot I,of_ HUMBER "OF LOTS: 2 Tract 2202 as recorded in Book 34, GROSS ACREAGE: lr� 5 Pages 17 and 67 Ill ASSESSOR PARCEL N0: 1077 - 09;,x_02 DEVELOPER OIiNER ENGINEER /SURVEYOR City of Rncho Cucamonga _ Lewis Development Co. Modale & Assoc. ,P.O. Box 117, N. Mountain Ave. 545 N. Mountain Ave. Rncho Cuc.,.CA 91730 Uplands CA 91786 uite 0 - Upland, CA 91786 Improvement and dedication requirements in accordance with Title 15 of the Municipal Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga include, but may not be limite tn, the following: f Dedications and Vehicular Access 1. Dedications shall be made of all interior street rights-a gay and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. ��_ 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the following streets (measured from street centerline): 44 feet on Terra. Vista Parkway_ 30 feet on Mountain View Drive � yv feet on _ 3. Corner property line radius will be required Standards. per City --fir 4. All rights of vehicular ingress and egress shall he dedicated as follows: 5. Reciprocal access easements :1"o maintenance agreement -- access to all : oar Aie nanc roads, drives orr parking areas+ {shall tbeeprovided by C -C &&R.s and shall be recorded concurrent with the map. Ida y r r X 6. All existing easements lying within future right -of -way are to be quitclaimed or delineated on the map per City Engineer's requirements. 7. Easements for sidewalk for public use shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through, private property. Surety X 1. Surety shall be posted and an agreement :executed to the satisf'actiun of the City Engineer and amity Attorney, g0aranteeing completion of the public improvements prior to building_ permit issuance for each parcel, 2. A lien agreement must be executed prior to recording of the map for the fallowing: -- — 3. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed, guaranteeing completion of all on -site drainage faciites necessary for dewatering all parcels to the.satisfactior, of the Building and Safety Divison prior to recording for and /or prior to issuance of building permit for Street Improvements Pursuant to the City of Ranh Cucamonga .4unicipal. Code, Title 16, Section 16.36 I20, the subdivider may enter into an, agreement and post security with the City guaranteeing chi required constructjlbn. prior to recordation of the map and /or building permit issuance. 1. Construct full street imprgivement- .including, but not limited f to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement; sidewalk, drive approaches„ parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. X 2.. A minimum of 26 -foot wide pavement within a 40--foot wide dedicated right -of -way sh.11 be 'onstructed for all half section streets. X 3: Construct the following missing improvements: Prier to building permit issuance for each individual parcel.,,. Curb & A.C. sis give Streit Street A.G. 14ediar. Street Name Gutter Pvmt. 4lal1 Arpr. Trees Lights nv6r1av- Is1an:Eicher Terra Vista X X X X X X X o *_ Mnt View X k X X X X *Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter X _,_ 4. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -¢f -way, fees shall be paid and an encroachment permitsSrall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any tthgr' Permits required. X 5. Street improvement plans shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of an encroachment permit, G. Deveioper shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocatiOn of any power poles or other existing .public utilities as necessary. 7. Existing lines of 12KV or less "frerting the property shall be undergrounded. 8. Install appropriate street name signs, traffic control signs, striping and markings with locations and types approved by the City Engineer. 9. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho r Cucamonga. Lights shall be on decorative poles with underground service. i K 10. Landscape and irrigation "'plans shall be submit ±�d to and approved by the Planning Di• "jision prior to the issuance of building permit. _ 11, Concentrated drainage flows 'shall not cross sidewalks. Undersidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards. �raina =3e and Elond Control X 1. Private drainage "_sements for cross lot drainage shall be required and Shall be delineated or noticed on the final nap. 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance "and d1spaval of surfaca drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 3. The foilowing storm drain shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City EngineerT 4. Prior to recordation of the map, a hydrologic and dr_airaga _ "Ldy rvr the project shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review. 5. A drainage detentloo basin per City Standards shall be constructed to detain increased runoff u off _ L i j� kLdinj X I. Grading 'of the _subject propert;( shall be in accordance with--th Uniform Building Code, City Gtading Standards and accepted grading practises. The final grading plan shall be in Substantial confo -aance with the approved conceptual grading pian. X 1. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perfon7l such work prior to issuance of` building permit. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer nr geologist and submitts:i at the time of application or grading plan check. 4. The final - radinr `1 � plan shall be Subject to review and approval b,} the Grading Committee` and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision asap or issuance of building ,permit whichever comes first. X 5. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the building and Safety Division for approval, prior to issuance of building permit. Genera, Recuirer3nts and Ayproyais X 1. Permits from }her agencies �iiTl be required L; follows: Aft CalTrans for San Bernardino County Flood Control District X Cucamonga County Water District for sewer and water X S ?n Bernardino County Dus; �b.atement (regzired prior to ctsuance of a grading Other L, A copy of the Cevenants, Conditions and Restrictions (C.C. &R.$) appr(,ved by the City A. >�orney is required prior to recordation of the map. Provide all utility services to each lot including sewerage, water., electric power, gas and telephon prior to street �constructon. X _ 4. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed-10-Cucamonga. . County Water D strict.ctandard_ _ requi roc(. -- •vu• - A Setter of acceptance :a 5. This subdivision shall be, subfect to conditions of app, roval from Cd!Trans /San Bernardino County flood ; ^,cntrol District. X 6. Approvals have not been secured from all 61lities and tither interested agencies involved. Approval of tvie final trap will be subject to any requirements that may be repeived�frsm them. 4 _4 C� x T.. The ffiing of the te:Itative nap or approval of same dnes not guarantee that sewer treatment- ca ? achy will' be availabT(k at the time building permits are requested, When building perm is are requested, the Cucamonga County 'dater District will be asked to certify thy; availability of capacity. Permits t-dil nit be issued unless said certification is received in wr:fttng. ti. Local and Master Planned T %?ails shall be provided in accordance with the Trail Plan. A,- etailed trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions; fencing and weed control, ' in accordance with City trail standards, shall be subnitted to and approved by the City Planner pri: _o recordation for issuance ror and;ar prior to_?auilding permit 9. ?rior to recording, a deposit shall be posted with the City :overing the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District 82 -1 among the newly created parcels. X 10. At the tima of final map submittal, the following shall be submitted: Title Report;, traverse calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as. reference and /or showing original 7 -and division. tie notes and bench marks referenced, SPECIAL CONDITIONS - X 1. An easement for trail anti drainage purposes shall be provided on the west side of Parcel 2 to provide for the connector qr-+M„ belt area and drainage of Parcel 1., The -kvent Width of this eas shah be in accordance with the Terra Vista Planned Community Specific Plan. CITY OF 'P,;,NCHO GtiCAM6o li3OYD B. HUGHSs CITY EN61.MR by: tj U CrFY JR RANCHO CUCAMONGA 13TAFF REPORT DATE: January 9, 1985 T9: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City, Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12672 WE TERN PROPERTIES - A total residential development of 128 apartment units on 7 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8 -14 du/ac) within the Terra Vista Planned Coimup ty, located at the southwest 'corner of Terra Vista and Spruce Avenue - APN 1077- 091 -02 (portion).. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of site plan, elevations and issuance of a Negatve Decl -tration. B. Purpose: Construction aF 128 apartment units C. Location: Southwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Spruce Avenue D. Parcel'ize: 7 ,acres E. Existing Zonin : Medium Residential District (4 -14 du /ac) F. Existing Land User Vacant .. G. Project Density: 18.3 du /ac H. SuLrr-ounddinq Land Use and Zoning: +� North - avant, under construction; Medium Residential: ' ' District, Medium Ifigh Residential District South Vacant; proposed junior high school, Aronosed gat k, Medidia High Residential District East - Vacant; Medium Residential District West Vacant; Medium Residential District '• PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 12672 January g, 1985 Page L f I. General Flan. Designations: Project Site - MNedium Residential (4 -14 du /ac) North - Mediur'f'Residential (4 -14 du /ac);_Medium High Residential '(14- 24,:du /ac) South - proposed Ju<<ior High School- Proposed Park East - Medium Residential (4 -14 dulac); Medium High Residential (14 -24 duTa <- West - Mediwa Residential (4 -14 du /ac) J. Site Characteristics: The suMect site is vacant and slopes gently—to the south at approximate-1,y 2 percent to 3 percent. Vegetation consists ma*'aly of abandoned grapevines. K. ARPI. :31e Regulations: The project is within the Terra Vista Flann;F Community and has a gross density of 18 dwelling units per acre. Although the density is aoove the Medium Residential density range (4 -14 du /ac) designated for this site, the Terra Vista P °_tnned Com; unity allows` for this flexibility in density and lari use as 1'oag as the total number of dwellings do not Qxceed the number allowed withire the Planned Community (Chapter , V2 -6 of the Terra Vista Planned Community Text). II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The site is bound by Terra Vista Parkway and Spruce venue on the north and east, and a future junior high school site to the south. The proposed development consists of two - story 4- plexes with covered.; garages arranged in a parking court. The unit sizes proposed range from 654 square feet for a 1- bedroom unit, 878 square feet for a 2- bedroom unit, to 1,008 square feet for a two master suite unit. The proposed elevations are of cente..;porary style with an ample variety of architectur�_I treatments and details. The recreation area -.1-- centrally located with greenway linkage throughout the site. Openings to the trail are provided fo:, at the south property boundary. Access to the project will be provided from`Terra Vista Parkway and Spruce Avenue, B., Design Review Committee: The Design 'Review Committee has _ reviewed the project and found that the overall site plan with its building orientations style of architecture; `open :..space ' area and density comply with the 'erra Vista Planned -- Community. !Fie Committee has recommended apprn al of the, project provided that the following improvements be made which the developer has agreed to: 1. strong pedestrian connection to the southerly • p. acing courts shall be provided. 2. 1+„re landscaping area and treatment shall be provided to all parking courts, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative 'Tract 12672 January 9, 1985 Page 3 3. Extensive landscaping treatment shall be provided around the buildings to the southwesterly side of the site. C. Technical Review Committee: The _Technical Review Committee has reviewed the project and determined -chat with the recommended conditions of approval the project is consistent - with the applicable standards and ordir3nces. D. Grading Committee: The Grading Committee has approved the F---iptual gra4ing plan subject to conditions which have been adaed to the attached Resolutior, and Conditions of Approval. E. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist ant' determined that no significant environmental impacts will occur as a., result of this project. A copy of part II of the Environmental Checklist is attached for your review:—!tnd consideration. III. FACh FOR FINDINGS, The project is' consistent with the General Plan ann Terra Vista Planned Community,. --The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use, building design and site plan, together with the recommended conditions of approval are in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Terra Vista Planned Community and City standards. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Dai7, Re orf. as a public hearing. In addition, notices were sent to a 1 property owners within 300 feet of the project site advertising the _. -__ I public hearing. To date, no forrespondence has been received regarding the .roject. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the 'Planning Commission issue a -Negative Declaration and approve Tentative Tract w•p 12672 by ad7suvinitted. ' f the attached Resolution and Conditions of Approval _ ResLactful c1c omez ity s?� nnepa _ G:NF:jr i PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF:QEPORT 'tentative Tract 12672 - January 9, 1989 Page 4 Attachments: Exhibit `Exhibit "A" - Location Map /Land Use Map "B" - Site Utilization and ,Natural ,Featurgs- ;:rap Exhibit "C" - Tentative Tract Map <' Exhibit ryD" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "E" - Pre?liminary Grading'& Orainags Plan Exhibit "F" - Conceptual Landscape Plan - Exhibit "G" - Elevations (3) Exhibit "H" - Streetscape of Spruce-?veaue`' -- Exhibit "I" - Garage Details <. Initial Study, Part IL Resolution of .Approval with Conditions e _ a71- o 1 -09-85 PC Agenda o 2 -of 5 M NC Nf M M-- N. LtVt M ' NC MH M , LM M .: ��. MH LM LM LM i i ht' C ? E LM E LM M JrH IV oP OP r` I . H Op H cc op u _t FIGURE 711-17 Land Use Plea CITYOr CCUCATMONTGA r_ PLANNING (VISION ITE-N I: 5 r t c� o� TITLE _ LncTfi3ON�� % tom. E%HiBIT: SCALE -t— , 4 7� SITE UTYL .''4Tl0N AND NATURAL (FEATURES MAP 'H ENT.ATi, ll ; -Z, TRACT NO. •12672 _ IH THE CTIT OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA - - .:OUNTT Of SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CAUVORN1A a m.,, ronmiwai.. Ill amp� 2. r. m�,°."..4sr 'r. mm4°.s curs. 4 4 �n4wUJm n.. W WRP. nw r:aau G� IfEY AlAP TENTATIVE _ TRACT NO. 126_ ?2 "I THE CRY Of PANCHO ruCAMoN6R �OONYY OP SA10 REAPURpINtl. STATE OP CAtIPOANIA. n KKR ...° i vv1prOiru.�' °.mwJO' 4"1° raam. J. +mru J. wn. - 9LOi ncCtwAYe, 19N�J LfA ACALf Mt'�'J_^ �.-- srxucA AYAnuA 7YAIdtLtRWM J � NURTH CITY OF =. RA NC Q CAMONG TiTI E: lh Wi de ? PLAMIINu DIvisioiNL EXHIBM. i �ISCALE - _,. - DETAILED SITE pLAr4 T ENTIAb'1 I i M — 'TRACT NO 12672 IH THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDUlO r UTASE OP CALSFORXU •� \ _ . ILOT w.OL""m ual ' �Lja'ACRErs ol `4 �I .• <�1y� r.W M . y 2 ,. HEP ITIAF PRIVATE 6RIVE�JAY AaGARAGE \ TERRA VISPA PARNI7AY PRIVATE. DRIVEWAY a PARXWS ' :l'aiCAlyillOk TYtE'll'atCO•-- �- _:ACRN W1rtf ,. I� .• � Trotalt�b.— ...[- .a[tonu mans . r� tt � TTSB'C11Ll0 «-- [- p00M[RRbn1t0Ri 1 "SORFAaT -- . **ru%m AARk- a.0aA0 SPRUCE AVENUE PRIVATE DRIVEWAY .1'0T7k.,IplialhpyOml - 1b., WTI L`$ZCTIOk TYTICA.t.>�C toll !kI.00a� _ _ .... •. �a'+'m[IUaresauv. . jt20E0iOLOMReMOF. _ •T]TE :02IQ8TEADUf1[alR 1008 [A:' .pURtlyt YS.0 OWAg. .7A0� 'R[OIAIUR a1O9..AC[aTOTAL; _ jfa4.IRA@510'a2Y ?L SOS20,Aw l77GSrucwmaluRwos 8120 xm aitOW ,t0T 0�YOi� CsIM& NORTH ro CITY Or ITF,M: Zo RANCHO CUCAMOilGA, TITLE: PLANNIN\r,, DIVE(), 3 ' EYHIBIT- --�, SGALE� ,�°' PRELI UNARY GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN Y TENTATIVE TRACT Nth. 12672 � tA.cr'0e`_. DI TItE CTIY OF RANCHO CUCANONOA ��.. COURTY OF $Aa RSRNARDiWO STATE OF CALUEO, IA q JR r . t tar acaweEa Ifee E.98 ntcss `S .;F `. ul ,�• i", ` , T e1 u r� { ~ .. e • J`� 'tsar >. � q -REV MAP 1y� moans T r ``�._ �• � r _ { { TERRA I— ECSIOX PARKWAY MJ�AL PRIVATE DRIVEWAY A PARKING TYTIGL07pX SFRUCE AVENUE - 7-ME!tiLYECTION PRIVATE DRIVEWAY PRIVATE DRIVEWAY at GARAGE Tvnc4LL SECTION TMC.5 /ON NIORTI -i, CITY Or RANCHO CLTCAMoNjTC;,A TITLE: ITE1•II PLANNE VIG DIVISIC XN EXHII3IT: „ SCALE- n- El 93 �12 f. J/ P '4$ tf1 U 6 a_ t � [z7 F--t /Yl/ _ 1j, ti �° � ��r6 �\�<i� -�•rt ._'IEf�" �rl Air :r �!/. „+ � ?a � °. �.. � r It :.? i .. . i ✓�n''� ,.'�%�°�° `-. r` L E l uj J LL O a J d h J O O m z h W LLL h ' (!1 h d w 0 W4 a cr d C3' to F- W 0) lu cc c� a l7 c c 9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P PART II — INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DATE:IRt%fi APPLICANT:NfJPGs FILING DATE __LOG NUM$E . T /a? 4TOSP As a RG Z! I PROJECT: /a , CIT_ PROJECT LOCATION *�iL j•� TG�Ai r�KifiL Grir I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" a sheets). nswers are required on attached Y£S MAYBE NO 1, Soils and GeOIO - Will the proposal.have significant results ins a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic relatioeships? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or burial of the soil? !SY ..__ c. Change in topography or ground surface contour intervals? d- The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic: or physical features? e. Any potential increase in wind or water erosion of soils, affecting either on or off Site conditons? f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? N/ g. Exposure of people or property to geologic �— hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, A mud - slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? h. An increase in the rate of extraction and /or use of any mineral resource? 2. Aydrolagy- Will the proposal have significant results in; s Page 2 YES MAYBE No AAk a, Changes in currents, or the course o� direction Of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream channels? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the VAZ9t and amount of surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any body of water? e. Discharge into surface waters, or any alteration of surface water quality? .-.� f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? �! g. Change in the quantity of groundwaters,, either through direct additions or with- { draaals, or through interference wit! -- an 1 aquifer? 1 Quality? Quantity? h. The reduction in the amount of water other- i wise available for public water supplies? I. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or seiches? a 3. Air Quality. Will the proposal have significant i results in: a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile I ! or indirect sources? ae�f - -- Stationary sources? 1X� b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or interference with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? , C. Alteration of local or regional climatic I conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? 4, Rieta _ Flora_ Will the proposal have significant re =ultr in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, Including diversity, distribution, qr rum er of any s ��� of plants? &Alk W St7 tf Gtil1 -Z co wt S�At4es!� -�Yr b. Redue on t o nom e s o any unique is e or endangered species of plants? f� Page 3 YES .MAYBE` 'No c. lutroduction of new or disruptive species of plants into,an area? d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural prod=tiou? Fauna. Will, the proposal have sigui €icant s:.suits In: a. Mange in the characteristics of species, Including diversity, distribution, or numbers _ of any species of animals? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? _._ `�,( e. Introduction of new or disruptive species of 7� animals into an area, or result in a barrier to fi;kti migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or aildL-.fe habitat? S. Population. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. dill the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of the human population of an area? b. NUill the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 6. Socio- Economic Factors. Will the pro7o -sal ,Ave signi Page 4 YES my-I ' 'm 8. :'ransnortation. Will the proposal have significant rssuits in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicu'ar movement? &�R -O&r rnk�-1� is IAtstB��1OW7- #-C _- ScJft 4wp,, v S9k�Ts J4iftc Pto ✓. z'r� b. E ecEs sti'n'g' o o st eela„ or demand for new street construction? c, effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking?� d. Substantial impac�_ upon existing transporta- tion systems? e. Altet ^ttions to present patterns of circula- tion it movement of people and /or goods? r f. Alterations to or r €fects on present and potential water -- borne, rail, mass transit or air traffic? X g. Increases in tvaf:'ic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? max-\ 9., Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have '`J significant results ins. a. A disturbance to the integrity of u�chaeological, g: - ..eontological, and /or historical resources? _ ,!\ 10. Health, Safntv._ and Nuisance ''actors. Will the ��/ proposal have significant results ins a. Creation of any health hazard, or potential health hazard? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazard,? c. A risk of explosion or release of hazard:,us substances in the event of an accident? d. An intreasa in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? e_ Increase in existing noise levels? f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous _ noise levels? The g. creation of objectionable odors? =\ h. An increase in light or glare? Page 5. YES ifAYBE 2a # I.1. Aesthetics. Will the proposal.. have significant results-in: AML A. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic vista a. view? b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site? c. A conflict with the objective of designated ar potential scenic norridars? 12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal have a si#;iif cant need ror new systems, or alteratiors to the following; a. Electric power? b. Nacural or packaged gas:? c• Communications systems? d. Water supply? �r e. Wastewater facilities? f. Flood control strztcrares? `/ AOL g. Solid waste facilities? `^ h. Fire pritectian? i. Police protection? 3. Schools? k. Parks or other recreational facilities? I. Maintenance of public facilities, including scz' and flood control facilities? M. Q, �— ,ernm -- Ital ssrvices ?' 13. Energy ,- arce Resources. Will the proposal have sibn iicent. rnsu.;ts in; a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? .. , b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy? c. An increase in the demand for de.eloisment: of new sources of energy? 3. An increase or perpetuation of the consumpt na _ of non - renewable forms of energy, when feasible renewable sources of energy are available? Page 6 YES 21AVBE NO e. '3ubstantiae.depletirn'af any nonrenewable or v- scarce tatttral t"ssource? .� 34. iiandatory Findings �f �ignif!_can�e. a. Does the project have the potential to degrgdle the duality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlifo species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels,- threaten to elimirtate a plant or aatn,41 community, reduce the numbir or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminat° important examples ai the major periods of California history or prehistor,? • Does the project hive the potential to achieve short -term, to the disadvantage of Jong -term, environmental goals? (A shore »terzr 3:n the environment is one which occury in a;relativ ly brief, definitive•.period of time while long- term impacts will endure well -onto the future). c. Does the project have' acts whir Individually limited; but cumulativelye considerable? (Cumulatively considerable meaty r-hat the incremental effects of an Individual project are considerable when v -lewed In connection with the effects of past projects, and Probable fr.xire projects). d. Does tha project- have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects OA human beings, either directly or indirectly? II. DISCIISSIONoE EtitTlRtt:*MENT_Ai EVALUATION (.e., of affirmative answers.to- the above questions plus a discussion ;s proposed mitigation measures). Aok c Page 7 Ift.: 'DurrimiNATioN On the basis of this initial evaluation: T, ., I find the 'proposed project CODLD NOT have a significant effect on tbG, environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I ,find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the enviro=ents there will not be a significant effect in this cage because the mit.:4 tion measures described o'h an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILI, BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the envirnment, and an ENVIRONMENT IMPACT REPORT is required. Date 4 7-7 7 7 4 S' r i Title - RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ` CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12672 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12672, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Western Properties, applicant, for,the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho' Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino,. State of California, described as a total development of 128 units on 7 acres of land, located at the southwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Sprpe :6 Avenues regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing' -and actin,, on January 9, 1985; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approvai'of''0tc Aap subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing._ NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City, of Rancho. Cucamonga does resolve as follows. SECTION 1:- The Planning Commission maI €?s the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 12672 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable tur the type of development proposed,, (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental 'damage and avoidable injury to ,.umaits and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any Qasement acquired by, the public at large, now of !,ecord, for access through or use of the JUL property within the proposed subdivision. Resolution. No. TT 12672 - Western Properties January 9, 198 Page 2 (9) That this projact will not create adverse impacts oo the environment and a Negative Oeclaration is issued. SECTION 2a Tentative Tract Map No. 12672, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and th? attached Standard Conditions.* PLANNING DIVISION 1. A stronger pedestrian c nnection to the southerly parking court shall be provided 2. More landscaping area and treatment shall be provided to all parking courts. 3. Extensive landscaping treatment shall be provided around the buildings to the sup »,4hwesteriy side of the site. 4. Special landscape treatment that ties in with the other three corners of the intersection of Terra Vista Parkway l and Spruce Avenue shall be provided. S. The interior street crass - sections shall be *f crown or tilt section and the pavement section shall be of 3-inch AC /4 -inch C.A.B. ENGINEERING DIVISION: l 1. The applicant shall construct the following off -sits access roadways, with a minimum of 26 foot wide AC eavement within 4C feet of dedicated right -of- way. a. Spruce Avenue from Base Line to the tract. � b. Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway from Haven Avenue to the tract including a bridge across the Deer Creek. The cost of the bridge shall be credited J towards the systems development fee for the Terra' Vista Development. APPROVER AND ADOPTED THIS 9th DAY OF JANUARY, 1985. PLANUING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGn BY; Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST:y lt-x.S Gomez: Deputy Secretary µ ` Resolution Nom' TT 12672 - Western Properties January 9, 1985 Page 3 I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adoptod by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day rf January, 1985, by the following tote -to -wit: AYES: COMW7SIONERSr >f NOES: COKE SS10NERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Aft I I 1, ah 4j U a L CL °sp OE u �� V3i.WT Yryg L'a Q.°G Lt�W�P GL 4QY� W-r C9 9�p4•� £L YO ETO Y.0 6 `yb6 ° id, +ca Qy`m. u aC GpT °pOy'. VaY ^n r =oca LoG „b'•..ca O �,na °y'a °off °QaeE...,o cwc� Y p`.+° .a 0�3L E°�- -,s. "' oeL.,o+'� -a. °`mR y pEl; �L dpgyO ID. +� r ZgaS F °n O.� 'ff �.v- DM p ait ZO4VfI G > fi £p --2 3t ~ +iy Ci cc•L°• ov :sue `+ rr v 9.GC iDy —aim c r°.a �.....� "-;:g a0. a'a actG; EE+,« O y� oY uo GEG e� OOi n O.Gqu Lu� '?'C EQ ��N -� t 0.�'u.a av Y.niasn=^ a o°at° -5 L;'n o P+ O iw +u�.Z �L nil te.4¢ m �S. E S Gt a y d C. G a b aE e 3 au 7nni. rV fiSGaa ° � 41 4°� S yy aLaQN °j » >rtl�Oi W �V dGT EqE Na AS ;8�. � 4 3 EE yttS pM.�Ll� V O u O ^Lt�pQyp o ° iy.Y c a a`a d y SGx !� Q iP rA d +3�a+yi�z w� S tam N O C`s Q9 s P PER! E� �d><p eLp °Y at+ u wt �di 4 vL L LyVL 'p ° =o= ° c a yPy Ws b v 87 IS �s w r.4 i+C � L_O� LAY 8C y95. aa- �ba = c a ° a _ b N6 '♦ t- 6LQ i 6�yb O 3 : 3T `d n b sC3.t t 3 n_ e. ✓N. J. AS 6Z at LE ° � M m� iiou t¢} 4 yc ' ^a +mss Ba wy ss: asps XI 1>4f .A.°. °5 a ki d L Yi 0 4R3 - w e�1 F y o'C6 °u .C�= p , af3�E . V�"'�CGf�: w •�� gu rG 4a �O P° rC°zr�sY pu si o c ezr cr=z- :d. c� o4 'E> C S —b L y� ° 'bE b ,yL A C g a a opm °! _5_U= srwc6 N E of i:a M �mA G� lea at � <b y� C G ��p V �m l41 CE2 3 4 2:� 9. Cb V ;�F M°^ _ S— 'cs w �P L 3 v E� Li 3c GA C °Q i..Tp mp.. gi Ew S1L °� Z.EL 4 pb 4-Zza 4gvn t; <Y � L_O� LAY 8C y95. aa- �ba = c a ° a _ b N6 '♦ t- 6LQ i 6�yb O 3 : 3T `d n b sC3.t t 3 n_ e. ✓N. J. AS 6Z at LE ° � M m� iiou t¢} 4 yc ' ^a +mss Ba wy ss: asps XI 1>4f .A.°. °5 a ki d L Yi 0 4R3 - w e�1 F y o'C6 °u .C�= p , af3�E . V�"'�CGf�: w •�� gu rG 4a �O P° rC°zr�sY pu si o c ezr cr=z- :d. c� o4 'E> C S —b L y� ° 'bE b ,yL A C g a a opm °! _5_U= srwc6 N E pb as .c. aLicd ELayi9 a�aC c �y,,n``,,un a ^a :�a dy C= ot. $ L c r E L O a. n «N o ^:'•o u u° q 'O qLr c edYL � La` c Mo'rp•uu «Li I'ma,r 6Y.T. p N. °y b.� v^ LL a c E a IRI VC �„� O C r Y N. w .C. • �, Y m S C q ^ pl �' d_ Oy H C Gjr �• .n.'a '' _ p•=9n ra eo° aT.'�+�tn as m'.m_ xycc a q emu ^R' Cl- N 'I b p OtU 0 C. L d y ^ y O m Ot OT y C C c 41 T S q e dqo 6 Cqr v rN L n d OE' p OnbQN m :05 ad c c q v nnN q3p. Aw N Cb + E Otw STN 4cgp b C � 4uf 2vsdd 44�Od 4u L.Ow4M N a j':� Vp1 - • a—..!: jLE^ a�s� _OY. /� f I� 1 W 'q ^ bOamOq -g.6 O.7 »2 .n Oqp a0 cu LY c _ 06 d 0.1 •�^ nL 6pr• rr �� Y qU Er E u ttt^ y N mL C 4q.L OEE E O' rwN tOx C. Cam.. q q^ dp 64. LQ W T O•b� C 3y G Ey mm^pm q Osgq r adiy Lr qta m ^ ^Y ro C qS' �dc N T^ C qQE OTO A E � O.N adcoL ?c .o ^�.� cq �d qn m�q � dw LZ•G ^� O ` dyn .�q.Yy •qU VL YL nNG �� q M C y c^ F U = O q r O Y t :t o Ld 9r mR myo� °O OO nx Yq 'r -a Ea ao ..c cc C c C C i N'T U O.r. a N � 0 L .✓ a ox b n O ! m � da n Ol 6 1W Y p W b y ^ ywd c^naCEa � w _F t., 6V zt 4 -EQ adqw n d F.: H. 4 ✓OCt'• 'A": L i i." •YN.e tig 6Nr. 2a>O fNS Iry N, O 4J v •n O i d Y G q D `�'' O C Y E E .W v6E4.t V F E.Yi d. o C i �oFF a C _ AMIL LCn EEO mp' �.L G O 6AV L y L A:d d O H. Rn G« y «« 9`«^ V` Y.�a V 4 t� « 1 • CNN d 4 EE • EE dU q.�y.T d LAR C a L... r •py d C �, • _. «M 2L G O w�0 TO ^9 C ... .Y. 3 ••a`CL NA. Y d d �L LY rC �U. E �qY .G �[ L g O • z =tJ Q C n v d 449 u�'G R Yc a� B •Y N �. L q Rv W O L•r LL ^_ ^.0 dUV'. ^« w .^rR ' 3t. -p.1 .LnW _ N.p 2� Mq. UC ol?af pG�b a� Cu p 6 TAY'. ♦. dgwY. +' Y C"GyE dd. d°•u '°%° u O�9 cMgg. _ ^na�V� •p..O qNl� O >•p A U W 3 Ny C3 00 •q..b0 r 1n O F° ; u° .Y. r �0. 6.OYMYI a 0....q..0 Y y c .nom 9R n�A� �^ NY T d N t�Va WFb. WYtt �G L'1�62 iw S r C ' 1 w- k: Y a� V C Ya •Y �� fl w YEEO6 yO �y « O qC VdN g- �.. IR- c wz '^� .°.t°ydN '^v. Y¢ o �YOw . t.'. 4 Aq .DC aNidyOn.0 6C o. V d V n3 ^rVCJ a YU ,^Ey «O dy�y =E ¢VO C E Y YOUO C' NOO y O as a' u 0• •� O LD dOT '°-i tLL .p tiCY p ' 'O "O uc. NY C« j as ^UN •^'+ �c� � �.G ^Y. q �pL Goy d R�� ¢y�� Kq�y�N 6 q U _ _�� � 4o - p ^. T OE a � a y utt�UVfO C VnL v _a ,v P'L.' rn ^ y. i6a� Cl0 �.G.r °•quY L n v L >E o. C aOd 4 y � YL} a YL �O � 1 3yW Vi 6. fit. qq a a G � N L � V N O rn u 1 = L 41 S Y Ar d n. p Yj N L d Y~ v a fi Q 4 4 •p 6 j, L a e a r oa nA t o Y^ L O O^ CA y� ^ • .�. N u °v ¢ A x i Vdsr >N= dO. O a dd U 4. •M Y - Nap° ° �.• �,� vo. EnVc a" C O9.h M` N ddM x OL O °V,y oO V ^.oY V�r u'. OE pC in aT L � LO aM. is diT, O`O c c� a° lE °d Aa ANC c�p� Ai. cr CIQ n C LNra --o. L °�¢G. € Ey o sY n O �Qd ncv r xEOU° L� Emu M •.. ap r°yy. .0 c^ RO - d L> N.0 n�^ P CO �V •OK p. ••�� PN ma•`+' n N.. a Aa �> ° �$ ga. o a gp p • =i ymE ^� t on = � V V a^ O �_ 6 L a O yam•. E4.. �o�. o'r Vim° G »+6L d. NiYC ¢GL WS 4 U� N6 6L b ry �y a O x1 .ANY Ci °oN A9M LO n •� ....,At. M.°,'a o�.Ypc c` � °O mo�c,.°. M Y,. CIQ n ? LNra --o. L °�¢G. € V °, ° °mQ E iu �� O N gVpn 9 �I ap. Cljgq Tb.... q.LTQy RO L> +• 9 G d Y < � ... ^� 'a ^ N .•'+ � x Y Q� Q.P.` N' Lu Lindy =i ymE ^� �=��..,. d �• ��z?YO= �o�. o'r Vim° E�..ao NiYC a�°ia y:n ZZ-1 _ An V.-. V r ` .ANY Ci °oN A9M aC =� W VYC VY .O?Y �. 6F� xGVyi >yLY•• t nN Eq 6Y a Y Vq CifO —� y L CO C Oc C4 NA NE YO NOa ap q- a°..0 o iy o� .- Ncrn >a �o 2°Y a <. _1 Q°•Onip a NAY+, i E ° 4 L p42 Od Y y. �� C� p q -q. ° OJ[ 4C a NHS. N VNn. 6nda <A AD a0 a� C OG•rx�E ^L t u 4.Oa E 6� S Ant �:C I O Z 4J U a •O i 0. N Vv a L L L D L v °�wNo d O. eL u a C N ,moo ^ L N•� L d At N E L mO u tit G N 2 C aEq « LW waN.¢TIu O c .°. A b d PG 22u YO.O ntC� gtiV �� EEL A yC AP PL Q�C f GV1 b w-.Y dd d ar L o� v1 � we x qd NO CCw. .C. Y1 Y fir- N d Lam.. aaw �. Nip Yv L� bgE.V O .mob NudC o V� dY a L 3Gd 06. 0 ^ Ta W,7 CL q u,Cy Lq NU uW cd ^ C w Y�C Ot a� qN W U Y q 9 Od d OI N.y ^ 6y 3N 6i.G ^ d V � A� 4 O Yq CC O.Y E L I f I A ^ N O L E c 2 E °u= C 0 000 o L �O -OI:J. Twin p 6 9 ^ L g x 3 Or C. Lu L v u�i Lam ^i• O o Ci� buNi utu"' N W d0�.•O•V u uKi G 4 ^ L. w s L « T a¢ 6 ^ y V u d` N pM da C U A b d PG 22u YO.O ntC� Td 0 4 L o� v1 � we x t12 C 6 E «Edp L yq m yr u t�J H W C N Eo L � d N a q.•, d ` N O N V d L G q N ^ O ..qzo z}• u., a L _ v C R c ^ Pti c x L � A s• q�y wT v c «V bN dd EC CN 'civq uc Eo iC = p 9 L u u .-L v ad xT O r �Od �.G •b C E 6 W :.+ °L`o d s q q d N W d 0 d YN G� V Oot� Cuq U�' pi. t O 9 V L ApdjE N CC d C b y b o o• ..L A «i At of N u w T.pi u � ~ ` 000 o L �O -OI:J. Twin p 6 9 ^ L g x 3 Y � V A C • C. Lu L v u�i Lam ^i• O o Ci� buNi utu"' N W d0�.•O•V d+'+ �Ll ^ L. w s L « T a¢ 6 ^ y V u d` N pM da bLY NO �q Nv t 6 b d PG 22u YO.O ntC� d uT 21 YEq Yd u L we 9O w �n0 O1W n^ o. E «Edp L yq a O Yq CC O.Y E L C L 11 9 N d !•C L E E q .... � 46�. Ld At v O. P.� LN Q 'P � C.Cd ^Wqu CL a O^ q` Oa nl E `C q t C y�Ti Lr. e j N n Y ( �Ll N .o ,4 " m 8 o «v in nW:A •- .t n N c �`o alF. LL. N9 44 M" il . G T.- U. r V L cq L U N �p V _ L ` G 5,2 O � �9u F ° ^L u M aG a y�� �u n� Lc q°�ey. O V U O E E _cd d qn j J C 0 � w4 UM Ou, M Y Ut Y C M a cT o £gO p uun.a rt' w to q NOV^q C�c` 9 =ug N y „° �E a � dt N'c i u N C9 q. rN °O UY q ..°. � q V O�i_o L9L B v L O4.U0. OTC CW � j q � uL W �I Y Ut Y C 9 p � CV L U 9 y to q N c C9 q. °O UY q ..°. � .1. L -a G „d 3d W F r O, n ey RE c vv y .e.a i U Y F Q a= G ' nN U L G d q Y U L OOH . N ' q 2 GG��.. EG Fc OC V G M Q U Ll tU �yT 0 =.7V YaTi nU 6 Q •�_ ?.OU G`'Y t qaV .C5 `N� s � _ Y� yo0 < � 3 1. � ^O L G. O nL q n < n � v CITY OF RANCHO CUCYWAONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 9, 1985 > t 1977 TO: Planning Comrr;ssion FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer V: Barrye R. Hansr,n, Senior Civil Engineer k SUBJECT: PARCEL MAP 8303 CHRISTESUN - Applicant's request for deletion of a condition of approval for a division of 13.1 acres in the General Commercial District (GC) located - at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue - APN,1077- 401 - 01,03. Tentative Parcel Map No. 8303 was originally approved by the Planning Commission on February 22, 1484 for 15 parcels. A revision from 15 to 11 parcels was approved by the Commission on December 12, 1984. However, the Commission felt that a free standing fast food restaurant, including a drive- through, as proposed by the applicant or, Parcel 5, vlas not appropriate along Haven Avenue. Therefore, to assure that such a use r;,uld be precluded, the Commission added a condition regniring tha removal of Parcel 5. For financing purposes, the applicant has requested that the Commission reconsider its - previous decision to delete Parcel 5. This request was reviewed by the Design Review Committee on December 20, 1984,which zoncluded that the creation of Parcel 5 was acceptable with a condition -that a free standing fast food restaurant with a drive through would not be permitted on Parcel 5. A similar condition (No. 5 of Resolution No. 83 -798) was placed on the project Master Plan (C.U.P. 83 -07) by the Plam'?n Commission at the December 12, 1984 meeting. RECOMMENDAT%Oij It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution after deciding whether to include or rP.move conditions 2 and 3, which would allow the reinstatement of Parcel 5 by deleting the previous condition to remove it, and add a condition not allowing a free standing fast food restaurant with a drive through an Parcel 5. Ptesp-%Afully submit ed L Attachments ITEM E l 3 eRN r. =77!3, g,13 ?3 cf 3r�k �$i� €:VIII ra ED ` s I t n J i � q ' Z LoT 2 � 7R 2.:J2 3Ai a7 fit LvT f ? MB r 4 1 1� f� N O 'Ie i V Fn lip •(r"t V li rl�t III G' ® �� Iiozll. i r m m �, `. �. e4f 4 r 0 ® C:3 t� 3 e h'f ij�L �f ��■pp .rl :`10-•. a a �y VF' R t OLD.- i co cn pit tit, t L ''� a � `, -"•3 �. v.�..y �.. .:� Lot. S= TR CO)-� ��� ❑ a 1S3 t f t a} fi �—r l \axal9 I , tIFES 'ti �i 4� kit Q., lT! F1i qqc� 67 F c 2t �TA� sr„rr V V a 25f '�' c .J j Sf` ti ° _. Nc r Ll x i \ •rat L 7 �yi •Tt Rak 'ty} f i r•� s LOT T'R 23— 34M Pty Lar ei IN low � t _ -- O 0 �iCa3�p , c? '� 1977 :ITY OF RANCHO CUrAil,IC ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY MAP I .fide; j L-M. 83d3 N Pafie I RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSYON, OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REVISED PARCEL MAP NUMBER 8303 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 8303) LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND HAVEN AVENUE WHEREAS, Tentative Pa "cel Map, Number 8;03, submitted by Christeson Company and consisting of 11 parcels, locate,' on the northwest corner of Foothill Bl,;J. and Haven Avenue, being a di',ision of -a portion of rot 20, Section 2, Township 1 South, Range 7 West, $im Bernardino Meridian.per map of Cucamonga Fruit Lands as recorded in Boo�:-!, 'Page 9; and WHEREAS, on December 12 1984, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for therevision to said map creating 11 parcels. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANOW CUCAMONGA'PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the "rollowing findings have been made. 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdi-!ision is consistent with Yhe General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed cievelopment. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substan-'ial environmental u" ;age, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 3: That Revised Tentative Parcel Map No. 8303 is appt pe.d_ subject to t e fo owing conditions: 1. The Conditions of Approval contained in Reso:lutiorr No. 84 -19 and 84 -19b 2. Deletion of General Requirements and ApRrovals condition No. 17 as contained in previously- approved Reso ution. No. 84 =79b. 3. Addition of General Requirements and Approvals condition No. 17 to read: 17. A free standing fast food restaurant with a drive through is not permitted on Parcel 5> APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JAaIUARY, 1985. PLANNING 'COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANC43 CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. St6ut, Chairman FATTEST: Rick Gomez,, Deputy Secretary T, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary, of the Planning Commission' -if the City of Rancho Cucamongay do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly intr&(uced passed, and adopted b,, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho (ucamonga, at a regular meeti 3,of the Planning Commission held' on the 9th day 'tif January, 1985, by the foll1 ing vote, -to -wit; AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT:- COMMISSIONERSi i i it' , — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ��3cAlyo STAFF REPORT O - p DATE: Jaruary 9, 1985 v > 1977 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krax1, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8901 - FAYLIN ENTERPRISES A divis �)Ti of iu acres of _land into Z parcels -in the General Commercial and, Industrial Area Specific Plan located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Center Avenue (APN 1077- 401 -08) I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested. App'r4aa1 of Parcel Map,., B. Purpose: To divide 10 acres of land into 2 parcels. Parcel one--'is to be the site of Bridgeport Car Wash which is on -toni ht's agenda fora approval as C. P` - 3 9 a PP C.U.P. 84 37. C. Location: Northside of Footh'rll Boulevard, east side of Center Avenue. D. Parcel Size: Parcel I - 2.5 acres: Parcel 2 - 7.5 acres. E. Existing Zoning: Parcel 1 General Commercial, Parcel 2 Industrial Park Area. F. Existing Land Use: Parcel l - Single Family Home. Parcel 2 - Vacant. G. Surrounds g Land Use:_:' North - Industrial Buildin 9 Y and Vineyard. South - Vacant. East Deer Creek Channel and site of Virginia Dare Winery West - Socorro's Restaurant H. Surrounding General Plan and Development Code Designations: North - Industrial Park Area. South Office Proffessional` East - GeneralCommercial West - General Commercial and Lrw (2 -4 du/ac) Residential. ITEM F I. Site Characteristics: The - existing site consists mainly of vineyards except for a small single family home on Parcel 1. It slopes approximately 2% from north to south. II. ANALYSTS: Faylin Enterprises has submitted the parcel map to create a parcel for the site of the Bridgeport Car Wash ,which is on tonight's agenda for approval as C.U.P. 64 -37. - This site will be draining into the Deer Creek Channel which is located I on the east property line. The developer is conditioned to provide -a drainage study for approval, by the City Engineer and the 4ounty Flood Control District prior te"�issuance of a- building permit or recordation of the -Final parcel map. `, is study will cover both parcels, although no development is planned for Parcel 2 At this time. The streets adjacent to each parcel are conditioned to `fie improved as each parcel is developed. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW': Also attachad.for your review and consideration is Part I of the Initial Study as completed bj the applicant, Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Sttrdj =,the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Upon completion and review of the Initial Study and field investigation, Staff found no adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the proposed subdivision.. IV. CORRCSPONDENCEs Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surround' .f' property owners, and placed in the Daily Report newspaper, Posting at the site has also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATION • :It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution conditionally approving Tentative Parcel Map 8901 and authorizing the issuance of a Negative Declaration. Respe tfully submit ed LBH:B . as Attachments. Map - 'Tentative & Vicinity Resolution City Engineer's Report initial Study f n TENTATIVE PARCEL AP O. - 8901 trAra crCUFroRraa 1s Pq EILR xcc woeo N MW 84 0► W►t. /ura i wrr•Ae t1M/Rf.[•SlNDFRlQI•+�ElOC.. ' •. wf/l Mein.f..`w• ro.w.w.a verse r s cc de IT 11 1 I Yrq L 1 f � � �— �►3�Pi _____..._ =;7 if c . °1"Yww'- Yr �_ _ tr, ' wwiwa�a• Y��Y rw+w Ell 4 r 1977 GENERAL �^ ENVIRONALNTAL REVIEW APPLICATION INITIAL STuDy - PART I For all projects requiring environmenal review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project agpliration is +jade. Venn ra.4ai;)t ,.e ►!.i: annla +i ?R tbs. Planning Division staff will `prepare Pa, -t 11 of the Initial Study and make recommendations to Planning Commission. The Planning Commission will make one of three determinations: (1) The project 1111 have no significant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration ,rill be filed, (2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or (3) An addrtion.tl information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. Date Filed: November 2 1984 Project Titlt: Sriogevort Carwash Applicant's Name, Addrk s, Telephone: Kelbert Partrership cya Mission Carwash. Name, Address, Telephot,,-of Person To Be Contacted Concerning this Project: Larry Wolff, AIA Wolff- Lang - Christopher /Architects, Inc., 5375 Archibald Avenue. 8ldq. 200, Rancho Cucamon�y. CA 91730 (714) 987 -0909 Location of Project: North Assessor's Parcel No.: Parcel 28, 14_8_ 34aV, Map bcc% 1077, Page 40 List other permits necessary from local, regicnal, state and federat"-agencies and the agency issuing such permits: Building Permit - City of Rancho Cucamonga Waste dater Drainage - San Bernardino Count Flood Controi f PROJECT DESCRIPTIott Proposed use or proposed project. A car carp canter consistinn of sinole story . c ructnres fora canrach sift shoo ooiish & wax detain area and a self -serve and foel ctrtion Acreage of project area.and square footage of existing and proposed buildings, if any: Q Area Z2.5 Acres I.Ptl Rleo_ Area = ? K(7f) S F Describe the environmental setting of the project site including information on topography, soil stabiljty, plants (trees), land animals, any cultural, histuricai or scenic aspects, land use of surrounding properties, and the dzscription Of any existing structures and their use (attach necessary sheets).-_ axictine site nresPn lv is vacant withoi,t anv deyelonneot with the exception of a restored residence which shall be moved off -site. Topography is characterized by a gently falling slope of 2Z running from north to south. The majority of the site area is covered by existing vineyards. 7T-few cluster of trees at the southwest corner of the site define the boundaries of a single family residence, and are not compa`_able with the proposed landscape there. No other significant vegetation or anima`. -s exist. Primary vistas to the noi�in of the mountains are predominant. The site borders the Deer Creek/County Flood Control Channe, to the east, Foothill Boulevard to the south, and Center Avei.,je to the west. Existing surrounding sand use js primarily vacant, excepting Socor� rats Restaruant located across Center Avenue, Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions. actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact Ilo fe 7. Estimate the amount of sewage and solid waste materials this project will generate daily: i rtificant, less than 25 gallons daily 8. Estimate the number of auto and truck trips generated daily by this project: 775 veiclP trios o r day av raae 9. Estimate the amount of grading (cutting and filling) required for this pro -jest, in cubic yards._ 1_500 yards -ut 1_20j yards fill 10. If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: 1 hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present;;the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and Lelief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by' the Planning Division. J N.te: Nnyamhpr 7 1984 Signature- 144 ' Title Arfhi t MILL THIS PRbJECT: YES 1. Create a substantiai change in ground contours? _ X_ 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise of produce vibration or glare? X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? _ X_ 4. Create changes in the existing Zonina or General Plan designations? _ X� 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? iu 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substa,,ces, flammables or explosives? X Explanation of any_YS answers above (attach additional sheets if necessary): hoc shall pxic ing trees located at th o hvr �rner ansnitablgfor hp removed rWtan_ ion fe 7. Estimate the amount of sewage and solid waste materials this project will generate daily: i rtificant, less than 25 gallons daily 8. Estimate the number of auto and truck trips generated daily by this project: 775 veiclP trios o r day av raae 9. Estimate the amount of grading (cutting and filling) required for this pro -jest, in cubic yards._ 1_500 yards -ut 1_20j yards fill 10. If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: 1 hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present;;the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and Lelief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by' the Planning Division. J N.te: Nnyamhpr 7 1984 Signature- 144 ' Title Arfhi t RESIDUITIAL CONSTRUCTION The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid the school district in assessing the4.r ability to accormnodate the proposed residertial development. Developers are required to secure letters from the schoal district for accommodating- the increased number of students prior to Issuance of building permits. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Specific Location of Project: PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TO1AL 1. Number of single family units: 2. Number of`muitiple family units: _ _I w. Date proposed to _ begin construction: 4. Earliest date of occupancy: Model'? — and of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price Range 1 T_4 RESOLUTION NO. AAL A RFSOLUTION OF- THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE wITY 'JF IRAN(iHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP N"!_ 4 890L (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 8901), LOCATED ON THE N0 TH SIDE OF FOOTHILL, EAST SIDE OF CENTER A"!::;IUE lu 'WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 8901, submitted by Fayiin Enterprises and consisting of 2 parcels, located an the north side of Footh".:I, east side of Center Avenue, being a division of a portion of Lot 4, Tract No. 2202, as recorded in Book 34 of Maps, Pages 67 and 67 1/2; and WHEREAS, on November 6, 1984, a formal. applicatitxn was submitted requesting review of the above-described Tentative ;Hap; and WHEREAS, on January 9, 1985, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above - described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SFyTION 1s That the following -findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistert with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is ronsistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physicaly suitable for the proposed development, 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health prob'ems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION ?: That this project will not create significant adverse environments impacts and a Negative Declaration is issued on January 9, 1985: SECTION 3; That Tentative Parcel Map No. 8901 is approved subject to tine recommended Conditions of Approval pertaisiing thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1985. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE QTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST; AAL Ruck u0mez, Deputy Secretary �} CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL LOCATION: North side of Foothill Blvd. , TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP: 8901 ` east of Center lrVenue DATE FILED: November 6, 1985 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portion -of Lot 4, Tract NUMBER OF LOTS, 2 No. 2202, recurded in Book 34 of r�iars, GROSS ACREAGE: 10 Pages 67 and 67 1 {2 ASSESSOR- PAFCEL NO: 1077- 401 -28 DEVELOPER OWNER ENGINEERISURVEYOR Alin Entero,•ises Robert Archer Linvi3le-Sanderson Attn: Jim Heiber '� c/o Jeff Sceranka P.O. .Box 846 8409 Mica Aveue 9587 Arrow Rte, Ste H Upland, CA 91786 Rncho Cuc., CA 91730" Rn'cho Cuc.. CA 91730 Improvement_ and dedication requirements in accordance witty Title 16 of the Municipal CodE of the City of Rancho Cucamonga include; but may not be limited to, the following: ANOL Dedications and Vehicular Access 1. Dedications shay; be mace of ail interior street rights• -of --way, and all necessary casements as shown en the tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be .made of the following rights -of =way on the following streets; _...�,- .______,_additional feet on � additional feet on additional feet on X 3. Correr property line radius will be required per Cit y Standards: 24 foot property line radius at Foothill & Center All rights of vehicular ingress and egress shall be dedicated as follows: Foothill Blvd. X 5. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to- both parcels and 'Dint maintenance for the northerly driveway approach on Center Avenue,is required. X 6- All existing easements lying within future- right -of =way are to ._;be rjuitclaimed or delineated on the map per City Engineer's regg0rements. ' X 7, Easements for sidewalk for public use shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. f $t! -_ y X 1. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements prior - to building; permit issuance for each individual parcel. X 2. A lien agreement must be executed prior to recording of the map for the following: One 'island , -half median- on Foothill Blvd. X s. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all on -site drainage faciiites necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building- and I Safety Divison prior to issuance of building permit for each individual parcel. Street Improvements Pursuant to the City of Ranch Cucamonga Municipal: Code, Title 16, Section 16.36.120, the subdivider may enter into an agreement and post security with the City guaranteeing the required construction prior to recordation'of. the map and /or building permit issuance. 1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights interior on all street`s: 2. A mirim= of 26 -foot wide pavement within a 40 -foot wide dedicated right -of -way shall. be constructed for all _half- section streets. X _ 3. Construct the following missing i^norovements: Prior to building permit issuance for eaci, individual parcel. Curb & A.C. Side- Drive Street Stj -let A.C. Median Street Name Butter Pvmt. Walk A r. Lights _Trees Overlay Island* Other Foothill ** X X MEANDERING X X X LIEN Center X X X' X X X *Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter' * *Improvemen•s shall extend across the Flood Control District property to the East of Parcel 1 r4 to meet the existil.g bridge. ri 1 it - A X 4.i Pri to any work being performed it the public right -ofd, fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from tite City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. X 5. Street improvement plans shall be prepared by 'a Registered Civil Engineer, and approved by the City Engineer- of an encroachment permit: g prior to X 6. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or oth?w existing public utilities as necessary. X 74 Existing lines of 12KV or less frd -ating the property shall be undergrounded. X 8. Install appropriate street name signs, traffic control signs, striping and markings with locations and types approved by the City Engineer. X 9. Street.liaht locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga;, Lights shall be on decorative ,,poles with underground service. X 10. Landscape' and irrigation plans shall be submitted to and approved, by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of AM building permit. X 11. Concentrated drainage flows 'shall not "cross sidewalks. Undersidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards. Drainage and Flood Control K 1. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated or noticed on the final ralrv_ X 2: Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 3. The following storm drain shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer X �, 4. Prior to recordation of the map, a hydrologic and ainage study for the project shat.,, for review. be submitted to the City Engineer 5. A drainage detention , basin per City Standards shall be constructed to detain increased runoff e 3 6rading i` X 1 �radiog �f the - subject property shall be in accordance with the Ask Niform" Bullding Coda, City Grading Standards and accepted g '� g practises. The final grading plan shall be in substwatial conformance with the approved conceptual grading pl'an.. X 2. A soils report shall•, be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work prior to issuance of building permit. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application or grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Grading Committee and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final' subdivision map or issuance of building permit whichever comes first. X 5. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted' to the Building and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of building permit. General Requirements and Approvals X L Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: X CalTrans for Foothill Boule4ard X San Bernardino County Flood Control District X Cucamonga County Water District for sewer and water X San Bernardino County Rust Abatement (required prior . to issuance:. of _a grading pernit) Other 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (C.C. &R.$) approved by the City Aftorney is required prior to recordation of the map- - X 3. Provide all utility services to each lot inclut(inq sewerage, water, Electric power, gas and telephone prior to street constructon. X 4. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga. County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. X 5. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval; from CalTrans and San Bernardino County Flood Control District. X S. Approvals have not been,',` secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requir:ments that may be-received from them. �. k -4- .r X 7. -==The Filing of the tentative map or approval of'same does nom guarantee that sewer treatr�ent capacity will available at the time building permits an'�(reques i,�P,d„4`Whin building permits arx, requested, the Cucamoi'*a CcsJnty Water District will be asked to Certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. 8. Local and Master.Planned Trails shall be provided in accordance with the Trail Plan. A detailed: trail 01,,n indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing ard,weed contral, in accordance with City trail standards, shaft. be submitted -to and.; approved by the City Planner prior to recordation for ;and /c -: prior to building permit issuance far 9. Pri -cr to recording,' "a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the- ,estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under- Assessment District 82 -1 among the newly created parcels. X 10. At the time of final map submittal, ; -the following shall be submitted. Title Report,,. traverse %,calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps. and' used as reference and /or showing original land division, .tie notes .and bench marks referenced. SPECIAL CONDITIONS X 1. Depending upon the results of the required drainage study and requirements of Caltrans, a stordr.drair"from Center Avenue to Deer Creek Channel may be required for the project. X 2. Approval of San Bernardino County Flood Control District will be required for all work within their right -of -way including connection to Deer Creek Channel, landscaping and alterations to their access .road. X 3. . The Final Parr,J Map shall. not be recorded untii a project&.iq,� beery approved f1,r Parcel 1 by,the Planrdng Commission. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LLOYD B. PUBBS, CITY ENGINEER by: I` , CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON GA ��cnnro STAFF REPORT P a o 1977 DATE: January ;, 198 TO: Memt:,s of X44 0anning Commission FROM: Ri,tk Gomez, City Planner BY: Howard L. Fields, 'ssistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -37 - X -� N RST{P - Development 'or,, a , square car w ga_s_ olm1e dispensing station and ancillary auton,ltiv: e°etail' facilities, on 2.5 acres of land locata4 at the dtz theast corner of Center Street and Foothill Boulevard in the General Commercial (GC) Development Distrit - APN 1077 - 401-28 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a precise site plan and architect urhl design, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Pur o% Development of a car wash, gasoline dispensing and autamotive retail facilities. C. Location: The northeast corner of Center Street and Foothill Boulevard. O. FarceT Size: 2.5 acres E� Existinq Zonina: General Commericial (GC) ...,�_ F. Existinq Land Use Existing single family residence G. rroundin! Land Use and Zoning: t - n ustria Development; Proposed Industrial Area Specific Plan South - 'Vacant, Office /Professional (OP) East Existing Flood Control Channel, Flood Control (FG) West - Existing Famiiy Restaurant (Socorros), General Commercial (GC) N. General Plan Desi nations: Project ite - Commercial North - Industrial South Office I East Flood Control /Utility Corridor hest - Commercia7 iTEM G PLANNING COWISSION STAFF REPORT Conditional Use Permit'84- 37 /Keibert January 9, I985 Page 2 I. Site Characteristics: At the present time the project site is vacant with the exception of a restored residence to be removed. Topography is characterized by a gently falling slope x of 2% running from north to south. The majority of the project site is covered with existing vineyards and a cluAer of trees at the southwest corner of subject site. The deJelopers have indicated that trees unsuitable for retention shall be removed. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The project proposal represents a diversified car care facility on 2.5 acres that will service consumer needs for proposed and future office /professional development within t« igmediate area and surrounding coMunity. The svbj��ct development will consist of two single story structures, wlj ch will contain the retail sales of auto at;cessories and seI►i -- enclosed wax/polish detail area. In addition, 'three overhead canopy structures will house a vacuu:3:r"rea, a self- service, and a full-service gasoline dispensing facility. Two access points are being proposed for the project, both access points will be located on Center Street with no access being taken off of Foothill Boulevard. On -site circulation provides adequate room for stacking of autos and efficient flow during peak periods. Furthermore, an adequate number of parking spaces has been proposed in such a manner as to reduce Circulation conflicts. B. Besi5n Review Committee: The Design Review Committee discussed at length compatibility/appropriateness of the pro p osed architectural design in relation to the surrounding area. The members` comments ranged between en acceptance of the basic design concept to a desire to have the architectural form and materials be completely redesigned to reflect more of the Virginia Bare mission -style architectural design. The members felt that since there was no consensus regarding the architectural design /form or the proper use of material,. ttrdt ""- the. project should be brought before the full Planning Commission for guidance and determination. tt is necessary, therefore, for the ,members of the Commission to review in detail the architectural elevations, 4s well as the colors and materials, and determine their appropriateness in relation to the type of development And the location of the site. C. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee has reviewed the protect and has favorably rc;`ommended its approval, The Committee has requested that specific conditions be placed on the project to insure - eompliance with the codes and sraWards of the City, These conditions have been included on the Resolution for the Commission`s cans- deration. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Conditional USL Permit 8447 /Kelbert January 5, 1985 Page 3 U. Grading Committee: The Grading Committee has recommended approval of CUPS 37 subject to special conditions rslat ve to drainage and finalization of the Grading Plan. E. Environmental Stud • Part I of the initial study, as completed 5Y— the applicant, is provided for your review and consideration. Staff has completed. Part II of the environmental checklist and f�Zk`nd no significant adverse impact on i,sie environment as a res,rtt of this project. If the Commission concurs with said' findings, then issuance Gf a Negative Declaration would be in order. II.I. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code.. The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant advarts environmental impacts In addition, tha proposed use and site plan, together with the ,ommended conditions of approval are in eomplianc ,pith the a;p n,able :provisions of the Development Code and City Standards. The Planning Commission must find that the proposed building design 7s conssistent with the Development Code policies regarding has <inonious building design, form, materials and color. IV. CORRESP.(WENCE: l,his item has been advertised in The Dail �Report as a pu,'lic hearinq. Ip addition, the property was po and notices 1, `re sent to ail property owners within 300 feet of the project site -df:'ttsing the. public hearing. To date, no correspondence has been received regarding the projc. V. RECOMMENDATION: Should the Pla ping Commission find the submitted architectural elevations, building materials, and site plan acceptable, then the appropriate action would be to approve the project through the attached Resolution and issue a Negative Declaration. Should the Planning Coirmis -ion find the submitted architectural elevations, building materials or site plan unacceptable, than staff requests that guidance and direction be given to the applicant in order Lo facilitaZe-,he necessary revisions and that the project be continued. R#ckGG+r fully.svbmitted, R; A,,,Cit y Planner /G:HF:jr r PLAN, °J1NG COMMISSION STAFF.:REPORT Cofi'o'-irional Use Permit 84- '= /Kelbert Jan.�ary:;9 1985 Pa}nit 4 i , Attachrrants: Exhibit 1111" - Location Map exhibit -8" - Site Plan; f cltibit "G't;- Graving Ilan kkhibit "O- - Building ElevatWs Exhibit "E" - 51gor Plan Exhibit "F- - L4sdscape Plan Initial Study, Part Ii _ Resolution of Approval l � t a l NFL` t �� ` `•` ¢�� � ��ut e �� � FG Axe, ova 3 �p M•r .. C RRECTION �, ,f�� � �•, ' - "tom.._. _ . 1'�`e+1� .�i� �^^ -°_. � PPN•ii Future City Hall PC T GC MMMIamfom =404(1- NORTH 1TNvii. mmRAINCHO U 1 JiONGA TITLE= I-,i.,riNNNIG IjNrIS� ; d , N r% �i RT= Y SCALE r; �.� fig Irmo. 0 „ S l t I� I i �y 5• ' 6 -� �C' /� � I k I t --�...... .. 1 G-7 E - -4.. Y 7 - 8 r t 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PART II - INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL MECKLIST PATE': r APPLICANTe FILING DATE LOG NUMBER-.__r p. PROJECT: v� ��it T � v� t' A?st6�+s C4SO.�r�<tltt �rs,OEitfsitJe�v ixiCrL, - o. J PROJECT LOCATION:_17%6''s�fSs�ir�F -2 I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all A /yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets). YES XAYBE NO I. Soils and Geology. Will the proposal have . significant results in: a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in r geologic relationships? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or burial of the., soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface ContCu'r i=en ills? � d The destruction, covering or modification Of any unique geologic or Physical features? e. Any potential: increase in wind or water erosion of soils, affecting either on or off site conditons% er' f. Changes in erosion siltation, or depostt'Wr.? g. Exposure of people or property to q.a ;ogic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, bround failure, or sitlilar hazards? a/ h. An increase in the rate of extraction ana /or use of any mineral resource? 2. Hydrology. Will the proposal have significant 1: results inp. t }' T�_ T a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction Of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral seream channels? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? C. .Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change In the amount of surface water in any body of water? e. Discharge into surface waters, or any alteration of surface water quality? f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? g• Change in the quantity of gxraundwaters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interference with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? h. `The reduction in the amount of water other - wise available for public water supplies? i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such a:. flooding or seiches? 3. Air Qualicv. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Constant or periodic air emissions from -nobile or indirect sources? Stationary sources? b. Deterioraticu of ambient air quality and/or Interference with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? c. Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? L. Biota Flora. Will the proposal have significant results M7— a` a. Change in the characteristics of species, s inaludtng diversity, distribution, or number of any species of plants? b. Red,iLtion of tL numbers of any unique, rare or endangered s- pacies of plants? Page 2 YE5 MAYBE Np tr� �y Z. An itnoxet uroalthe qulaity or quantity of existing, consumptive or t?on- consumptive ,1 recreational opportunities? V' Page 3 YES MkYBE No, C. Zn£roduction of new or disruptive species of Plants into an area?° d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural production? Fauna. Will the.proprrsal have significant results' in; n a. Change in the characteristics of species, Including diversity, distribution, or numbers of any species o;: animals ?` b. Reductic =, of the aumbers of any unique, rare or endange*ed species of animals? f f c. Introduction of ze,v or disruptive species j£ animals into an area,, or result in ca barrier to the migration or moveme,;tt of animeis? d. DeM ioration or removal of e.asting fish or wildlife habitat? 5. Popula,,ion. Will the proposal have significant e e results in: AWL a. Will the proposal alter the T.ocation, distri- bution, density, df' erzity, . -ar growth , ,race o b. Will the proposal affect existing housings or create a demand for add:.tior<al housing? 6. Soc o- Economic Fa ^tors. Wi'.l the n,- oposal have significant- rtisults ine a.. Change in local or regic:zl socio- economic characteristics,, ttitluding _conomic or commercial diversity, tax rate, and propertl va?res? b. Will psojec *_,costs be equitably distributed among projerm beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax payers or project users? y y/ 7. Land Use and Planning Considerations. Will the proposal have significant resulta in? a. A substantial - alteration of the present or ` planned kand use of en area? y ` b.; A conflict: with any designav;tons, objectives, policies, or adApted plans of anv governmer,al. entities? ! !� Page 4 YES MAYBE NO 8. Transportation. Will the proposal have significant ' rus.ilts in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? r. Effects on existing stre ?Ls, or demand for new street construction? c. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? d. Substantial impact upon existing transports- tion systems? e. Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion tion o. mov-nt of people and /or goods? +, f. Alterations to or effects on present and i potential water- borne, rail, mass transit or air traffic? - ` g. Increases Jr traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists oxedestrians3? r. 9. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in: e.. A distutuance to the integrity of archaeological, i paleuntological, and /or historical resources ". 10. Health, Safety, and Nuisance Factors. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Creation of any health hazo•`'? or potential health hazard? -� b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances in the event of an accident? y d. An increase in the numbe- of individuals _ or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure or people to such organisms? - e. Increase in existing noise levels? f. Sxposure of people to potentially dangerous noise levels? S.- Ae creation of ;'pbjectionable odars? h. An increase 3 A..Ight or glare? ' Fage j YES MAYBE NO 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant results iu• a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic vista or view? ,/ b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive ...... site? C. A conflict with tine objective of designated or'ootential scenic corridors? 12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal have a significant need for new systems, cr alterations to The following: a. Electric power? b. Natural or packaged gas? C. Communications systems? d. Water supply? e. Wastewater facilities? y/ f. Flood control structures? l g. Solid waste facilities? h. Fire protection? ib Police rotection? J. Schools. s[ 1 k. Parks or other recreational facilities? j 1. Maintenance or public facilities, including roads and flood control f-.cilities? _ ✓ /' m. Other governmental services? 13. Enerr�v and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal have significant results inn a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel, or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy? c. An increase in the demand fur developme*te of y,r new sources of energy? d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumption of non - renewable forms of energy, when feasible renewable sources of energy are available? f Page 6 YES ?�.AYBE` NO e• `Substantial depletion of an°j nonrenewable or ~� �i Scarce natural "re-Source? 24. uandatory rindinr of Sim ficance. a. Does the project Eiave the potential to degrade the quality, of the environment, substantially ;reduce the habitat of fish oz Aidlife species, cause a fish or wildlife populatipn to drop ? 7selow self sustaining levels, threattr to eliminate a plant or animal Community, reduces the number or restrict the Lange of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the ;haj•ar periods of California history or pre.tistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short -term, to the disadvantage of long - term, environmental Eoals2 to sbo.t -term impact on th environment is one uLj,,h occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long- term impacts will endure well: into the future`}, C. Does the project have 36;pacts which are Individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable AWh means that the Incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, and probable future projects), d. Does the Project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? II. DISCUSSION OF ENVIR021L:NTAL EVALUATION (i.e -, of affirmative ansserg -to the above 4uestions plus a discussion of proposal mitigation measures). J-* xv c� ti<r`A!LrJC{� �t� �U vF�ir`.S/�i�it'tf,/r✓.s/ ;sa'T �'��%�i�.d' /OS! -i` " AQ �•�.� .��� -,��T d�iG� C.�c�e�sE ��,�;d= .G'E,t�'�G �r� „� ,f:'r- sc� i ' . RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUC7_MONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 84 -37 FGR DEVELOPMENT OF A 7,500 SQUARE FOOT CAR WASH, GASOLINE DISPENSING STATION' AND ANCILLARY AUTOWTIVE RETAIL FACILITY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF x2NTER STREET - AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 7.h day of November, 1984, a complete application was filed by Kelbert Partnership for review of the above- described project.; and WHEREAS,. on the 9th day of January, 1985, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commissicn held a public hearing to consider the above - !--scribed project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Ran,'i Cucancnga Planning Commission resolved as follows, SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed_ use 'is 'in accord with the .eneral Flan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the ;purposes of the district in which the site is 'located. 2. That the proposed use, together o.ith the conditions applicable thereto, will not fin detrimental to the public - 'health, safety, or welTore, or materially injurious to properties or i'tprovements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts onlfii° environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on January 9, 1985. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 84 -5' is approved subject to the fol owing conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. Additional landscaping or a combination of hardscape and landscaping, shall be provided along the Flood Control Channel in order to increase the amount of screening from Foothill Boulevard.. Also, the le',ldscaping setback along the north property line shalt be increased to a minimum of 15 feet. r! i Resokition No Page 2 2. A Demolition Permit shall be 'obtained from the Building Department .prior to removal of existing single family rf,sidence. . 3. The wlicar shall providt texturized na_uing treatmnt as indicated on the,site plan. 4. The project shalt' accept drainage flows from the area tr `he north and provide, a proper system to -- convey said slows through the site to an approved outlet facility or an alt`rrate system shall be - provided a'4 approved by the City Engineer. ENG1,: ' RING 1. DepeT +ding upon the results of the required drainage study and the requirements of Caitrans ,Footnili Boulevard being a St,:te Highway), a �,torm drain from CeW'er Avenue to Deer Creek Channel. -Aay 'oe required for the project. 2. Approval from,;Caltrans will be required 4or C-1 work within Foothi` }l Boulevard right -of -way. � 3. Approval room the San Der^,irdino County Flood Control District will be required for all work within its. right -of -way, including conn4,ctlon� to Beer`Cre €' �nannel, landscaping, and alterla."dns to their access road. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 4th DAY OF JANUARY, 1985. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman - ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary 4 0701 -0 o 1- 09.85 PC Agenda o 3 oaf 5 L Q Ctsro us". p, 1pLa u uw.w o� - a9P Yom. ^�r�p O ..e. q o.0 unu +- wqN Ua' w �+ .O 60 'np°n�u 0.4aOC d9 3,qC q\i 400.EYU. F n. yY.. .. OYG A wd E ` N CV G �wgOe�EU =� Na MA y W Y L G d 4 4Y UZ n E e 2 T O w W. U.79r.Y.q ciao ='NFL iy« oC E F..Y EEO Ngry �! E... p..E. EI \OL °0.0 � ON O .e r� NO ypULU OMC c•�de ^O� c`3a Y p e Nac va...': EC �� �Lrac n TS^i'r �N s pEYrro u� q^ d q q w ay Vfq L c^ _ a• °J yacq o 6 u TOG r pT� O C p4 �. tL w UQT Hr VI ♦O ra M C M O N ` O \ Y a q� 0.."YNGL 2N Va4C p� Q Ir -OO.pN A! 8-5 U CN +YU.ty G F, t G �¢b:OSG 7 I d s a° Y N Y F V E -IH �... -.. +- �I U � W L d e T 0 0 M �• o a ° Feu --.2; ° ° n. i °'� � : r Du pa O G QT U - E T ? Y F L U J"'. i 3 UV •• ET S �- q a ca y c .I � .. `�.. v1.N N dr''os $' `cti m er-.a i•. -rina NC.°.. U 0 Vw J Q N N - -- 6-310 ( c Na moy NO..+_ ^ CCY ^�rj 6 {. D�4 Y4 Uu p. N^ OC aaLO 'raD 91 C O`4 �i �v G N L R U V O l: L L Cy O 3 G ^ E „4 1 ^ L. in N N wMy G!n�pe y L4 Cb q49. CM Y�U=O 200 G`a44L VLyt V EOp."C.q 4veN ".5 ^G CU Tu U y.4. p^ yY 2 LPL^ c y2m: �'.Ev ..O. N L D V.s^ 4-3 NSSY yNyL OL64zD L- e�A •r-f HA,'e xm Ds� V.. YDe o �` � :- iyuii ;TdAY: ° oL 2w.ED^ gz � ..�. .c.°. M. .N,... N.W� •Cwq- a N x.8.0 a'+N C LW. `.YGG q�Q Vu NO V«N 4 Lc c L C y L. W qN q,04 ice✓^ ♦ n` b 4Z L nNV N nN C?0L'�l. T _T^ D L�Vb dgK�1 °EOD 6490 t CL���^ 0 ^r C�DY CO ^ �aa r4 LO q .COG �6w yV yYLVn 4ggL4 u L ;.e Y i... M 0 V R V '�= E 4r `-OC dN�4 .g O "rw I L 'S� pp Hutt N.. KLYSati 6fV 4 G°'°0 Od ac..... ° ” v N Nd M46 z--- ., ;�.� v .. O.. W CWnv 4%.ND Kg4L..m N C y 1 9 '. jt V..M. �A N• O.K >rY 4. Cq uVC4N V I aA ^t;��y co Labc ='�y Ya D.°," « - =. E c w rL o uL CLOg3 Cu Z. K � �c S. GF U.EO q _c L Vd Tq -.z D q° C . y NL u Nb �N N.2- roNS Nua... .. a Dt y L ^4 bd 'CNVa roam 6p 4V C .>NU�':� ucc D L N G C L C q M� L .0 > ~q o o N 0 � 1. ti C C N n C 0 Lt°t . LD q ..0.' - �, V;cQ� V� �V�x uM�jo NcuQ Qc GYM -M 9i w U LE t LDCZV., G� 4 QC.. °fC LYC09.` L�l�' v LdaOV y�a 4 t C_N a.0 Sy D .C4' G04 S ti a 0 r0. �� 3Yp CSC C. C ^V� V Cb9.p G D b Irz D C L O y U V O N O Q iur l:J dN 4b Sw aY4 SAO C nT CgDC. n E. LNC GN..�..'G e,� pa g3 pL. Gg¢= 2v GGEnq M� N Y� n V ��L CYI D C y0r q w O r L E ib Z`�r 4Srr. . Op ^u c LJ L CON �.N V n. ` _� �y C0N Cay.�4`� Tyy V 4 NbC yvC4t OC. O. d€ O CO r+dC Cy ANIL L try Y4 M6 I.L�D 6.° -y'IR Nq- y ` 4 4 44 Jw'cD 6 DO O rCy nw 9s CGm tl r9 tq oa °osLi ra_ i tuy'iz a pY m \Oi �.o tl UP _ �' w, �Cp Yd ��uu � tlgLKv C f 1 f 13 YOi� oo� S. C� AYVVq 24MQ 'Critl•. •bCV. qi r V LV mCrnc �d {T. Vet •� 9�^Y �q G V. A bYd ^Ry¢ Yy � p Maw. C O ^QO' Yw L' DLO gip. ¢i p� L tlbV u�4 tl�� .5 ^� d.'c° 4q. N ^D iJ t Cad Aq �y�... 3COt o. 4 .3„ aq� paa. p F tlENC. ?sby _ ti 4 V Lpm r a VCV i tl L,y + b VS r4 O.� pp � m ZC'�yq Cju ?Ca E� VR„iE amp i CS bgtal a tl Y a.Y � E r ? YPp V a �. � 1+°', ai tCtl 9L7.ta Y i9 v�.r6C CV= t` 4 LY E F. Y Y CLS .+ c9 p =tl - i IX4 Ytl gaq =� 6�Y•� A 4q� q G4 O Ur �yQ X607 V O Hm by ^C = tl^ N C G'� tl O �Eptl r. d..aC Y ri�N L M �argCO O�NOOp �CC Y ��L r O ON� Ua C Y iY.0 4 ¢R E °1 a °r 6�a t iT CMt 6W M Cb.aYU v Z C C FD c ein O+ 2 �2E� y yb a b vM � w zs ce N N• q 2.� -°aL &..C. �aC aC' 9 l t Lt n O C LC � o6a� PM6 ^^ CC iiC Ldbq� —L S—s �:p �.V C^" UPS q ^4CyY 2 ^V a K ws a^: ..,N '.`°� EY �° "_°'„ d'... awn ✓L �LiC a� tMNp ^a ~ R.? tz O ^ w o o. 2i ct ...� u HsY,.0 c¢ c� ptC •c u tl ntltiD cc x Ya d : _ r: ao uN Lt N 7„a, Q. O« v 9 dtl. t cY 4C RrG E�y O E a.- -- as o t aC bip �a I4 4r w. I a �d O�+�9 t X. 3 9 =E�V 4�Y� N� G b C nap `o]1fI��I^ LOvV.. I L E {• - a u x - v „T Otlpi o 5 b0 aaY® LET L ab Efi. Y� �V � :i R;:7 r'Y RN "}�� <v' M IL-dw �v C'p HQ KMYle �✓tlN OLR2 dT�O�N {tw^ 2N6 s�M't N R ♦ ♦♦ y n 1 Z U O i d vu �>v t.f q. °u�v cc ca uc c rain ttaa J a! ( W V G� Q +l+L� C d �d 4 � Y E4tT � �'�'. � • OCw G •.. A, ^ � T � C 1t V .- �..O.O C V C _ 6 i. O•r L T.; d C O � t fn C OV 55W w CCf r w F.d F .Q� arc � Q.'N u p opb�. N •.. '. LY' V Coq N O O� yam. Epd.0 4 W Y C k6 O fLd 4.00 V•� „<. N N� cL Mb OC O �.L CQ� <ri.a E p Et d d� m4 O' ay „aLR q vy u� E Ct Gma.Od C E v � O Y� =CI. wN0. 0.E Oj'�^• C� .6f �. xVa CAGf�d 3 ��ddV �4L E..p. ^` Y'O A.d ut76< dYQ. 9 •CSG C� J• L f '�. ¢. _ G dC E\ �G�`,Q� Cb4 GuL rp, m a a L G d 6 ��NY d.. ��Od C L •C Gaai 6 =.L tLNR w.4H N < a C-a3 w guQ ` E.$ wb vd nN N �.. 444 u Oar w dy � a V W O O MO C� O �v p L EC � i•a a.=. p. p3 yp L E °it Nv i Lp�p. [ c j °._ ... - ...� u u f^.f r:vf'i a —F.ti oL w A 7 a f Y,.0 E T v 4 c dam.. c_D ca G N O Et�- C ttaa ( W V G� Q Ktt cE ^pG6 w }f C a ,dp - 3 V v a C c. O 6 oCN —y. O CQ' d C O � t fn C OV 55W w CCf r w F.d F .Q� arc � Q.'N u p opb�. N •.. '. Fq �g �v GA E N O2 NCO n A L (` Ft C •+ G OI L T fLd 4.00 n fb.` v Mb OC O �.L CQ� <ri.a E p ^ V CYIi v .y' � Y �El EO p y L tL. C^ b. �• a. C Nti H^ vu O CCf �'. T. C C O L�..� LYO C� V4 II a p A C T<� �O ON�C' W� JTC Vs.ag � �► `Cy 9 •CSG ZE 4t. Q.y� mL OED L9nG L W6T G4MfE0,{ G dC E\ �G�`,Q� Cb4 GuL rp, L Lf.L 1=-•4 N O ��Od C L •C Gaai 6 =.L tLNR w.4H N < a C-a3 !VO Gg o� d 'V `. ° `°•^' v 'p' c f." c °'°' . a may'- � a ,,acci FN F k a 'n �df °A c °ZF � co ca c. �. era N,o^. ° Ate.. vi cyuN rs : �•Q. 92+. o� ^ E dQR Sry4u Q GL Tu '^d NA °t cvdw A� 7EG It r ' N u0 .-• d NO,t VF,.cO hY VC v� Sc VaP O1m �� ° Ve.`S °A E cc3 yd wo bpi o..Ti 0.... ti HR� LN uQ o� go E QQYN E^ .taw «pYA G4w 44 44L WF ° tO.ragNg • N ,\ � ^f M 1�[ � � �+ bO: \ V Rr O.O.( •y <R. L « 't « L tC + G h .... L.O. w OA IL Gp ^� 0 6 �Q�� ut T9 6 L.4 G Z =C tC rb n•°CI6 V.pC p t. 0i LM1J U � ro ° � csG.CC N ycc bQ t u .cT Q E w°E QAtp ii �. Ce�aA s L.t IZI q<l ^ L` G OuG CG° y Np Cam. r< u ERLsO f'Y..q Nq YAh 4 4 `G «�� LET O- tj E Q L L « .L. ✓ > fit «� q. GN 1t yY L O. L A F.0 O Q�G � ✓@ 4 E cE «u� N G c N'u o O C. E L. V �• L O Y M E N4 ci C A FAQ d A' CCf Nn E p p E> 6 RG !`.EGq 3 C n t ht G E A �C d V a C yG QA• y.0 r G646.N 7Qt.A N. hYb Nr 6YQ> Cq .sG CO.�SRC'.� EE �qEAE ufi4. 06'^E�L �i �` �Q + �OV .3 ,iRR�y 4AVR°i tS. ilq � uA O ig r W (/fit mot[ • 1 O Ili •'f C �N V Z Cd wA L bH uu n- aAE+G o: 42 w b w ^ A r •y L d ^ � `c °s � > ° w,p Y Any '� M E a ^ •r7 Q b wy � 6 N c a� ny. Nb. n Uyy Goy' Aw: Lv urn ° O W� `t' G bob fj Off~ = CN ^U d Gw ud � m% vu i aLib p =gym �RMy w� y nV N OSEUm aow tp Ey .p E*p' ° Y^.-E ua ci2 nnut 36GLi On LO ` N�p VIE r A~ ^ Y L Su A ; aLm E L L� 27. =YL wm Wu u 6my dY. Od °p C' q O YLb� V La w b nma µ ° e�1 Lwil NT Eq �..+bW.�w O m N: a...w L4i GU fL.G. x Ni L` w OL Sri wb 2 1�0 C I I O Ili •'f C �N V Z Cd wA L bH m •� G ci y 6 0 a q r w pr `c °s ~ 9\ V V Eb OIV u a L t • C oC G r N Z O G y'd wy nr GY Gw m o.,c m% vu E a t: aLib p =gym E} Ep ui yC. y N �•D� Sy Y nnut va n r a � ; S Aj Ili •'f � O u V Z Cd wA L bH m •� G o A a q r w pr `c °s �� o Eb OIV u a L 6 p a• , O G y'd �iLr GY Gw m o.,c m% vu E a t: aLib p =gym E} Ep ui yC. y .. L �•D� Sy Y nnut va n r a uZS S Aj wm Wu u 6my dY. Od °p C' q O y N Y U µ ° OLD A 6 A a...w Gyb O °L u bn u °o S� zoo mu vW r0 G '' M. a Ili E i+y 0• ¢` ^wWIL L' V Z Cd wA 1L 1�vC1 m •� G O� '^b r w pr `c °s �� o Eb OIV u a L 6 p a• ou LoG N .p G E a iii yr n�`r mCO q p- n d °�tz I l � 1 T oup� ny =p€ nnut va n r a C� C C Y E np, yp. E i+y 0• ¢` ^wWIL L' V Z Cd wA 1L 1�vC1 m •� G O� '^b ° � aG cnvE `c °s O O C C m k., E n ou LoG N .p G E a iii yr n�`r mCO q p- n d °�tz I l � 1 p c V v A a9 v w� AiNk n 1 � a a L o �. we _ � vz N •f �L � t Q� V O � Gw �� ` � NCy4° UAL U py 7a U aCN� L u.. p� Nu V SC WV OG E. � Gn !LL me �c is mot x °gym us .�NO n? : 16�T i c •a rp t'on c.'. •� 9 E i G tu..s ;r .C� � • U. •.^ r.+U.O t! a fj.7 4ua co g i, yAt C Di O' I ---- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT O O F � Z - U A 1977 DATE: January 9, 1985 TO: Chairman and - Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 84 -05 - CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY - A development district amendment to prezone unincorporated territory as "Car;,n Planned. Community" for approximately 248 acres of land, located between the extensions of Banyan Avenue and Highland AvenuE on the north and south, and between the extension of Rochester and Milliken Avenues on the east and west - APN 225 -141 - 08, 12 thru 19, 21 thru 28 and 225 - 151- 01 -03, 07, 08, and 10 thru 13 TENTATIVE TRACT 12642 - GARYN - A residential subdivision of 470 lots on 115 acres of land, which is Phase I of a larger master planned community, located between the extension of Banyan Avenue and Highland Avenue on the north and,jouth and between '.he extension of Rochester and i Milliken A;)enues on the east and west, APN as above. DEVELOPMENT, AGREEMENT - CARYN - A Development Agreement between th�)City of Rancho Cucamonga and Caryn Development Company, Kaufman and Broad Land Company, and Ma. ^lborough Development!, Corporation relative to - properties located between the?zxtension of Banyan Avenue and Highland Avenue on the nor't'h and south, and between the extension -tf' - -- , t east west, Rochester and Milliken. Avenues on he and e s a es , APN as above. I. ABSTRACT: The City Council has entered into an Annexation Agreement for the County - approved Caryn Planned Community site, and annexation proceedings are currently under way. The Planning Commission is requested to (1) review the Planned` Community /Development Plan text, (2) review and approve Tentative Tract 12452 for Phase I of the project, and (3) review the dr#t Development Agreement between the City and Developers to guarantee development of the site in conformance with the Planned Community provisions. Approval of al 1, three items is recommended. ITEMS H9 I, & J PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Caryn Planned Comunity January 9, 1985 Pace 2 II• ,BACK ROBHD; Couroty �rovals- In June of 1984; the County Board of-31i of ,Supervisors gr anted ante d th e i r approval val to the Car Yn C an p an Y residenti.4z &bject. / ICI The e ntir e Ca r Yn planning a re a con s ists or a ptro ty 28e a � t$ territory adjacent our o Ci 1mits on he north de OfHihian nhgd Averse, between the extensions of Milliken and Rochester, {Exhibit Prior to the Countv,approva�s, the City staff worked cioseiy with the County to assure that the City's interests and concerns be reflected in the design of the project. The City Planning Commission has reviewed the project at the May 23, 1984 meeting and expressed ;general satisfaction and support for the project, subject _.>to conditions. several These conditions have since been incorporated into the project as conditions of approval by the County. At this point, the developers of the project have all the necessary County approvals, including the approval of the Tentative Traci map for Phase I, to proraed with the construction of the project stside of the City, in un!:asarporated County territory. Attnexat$0n Ageement` Subsequent to the County approval, the City staff has negotiated an agreement with the property owner and developers to annex and develop the site in the City rather than develop in the County. This is consistent with Local Agency Format urban develop ion Commission policy of encouraging ment to occur in incorporated cities where the necessary urban services can be provided most e.,fectively. In this particular case, the development of the project will have an effect on the City of Rancho Cucamonga, whether of not it is actually within the legal boundaries of the City.L The future residents will be using. our City's streets, parks, and schools, and wilt be dependent on other services as well. Consequently, it is important that .the City retain a degree of control over the project area, and that revenues generated' by the development flow back into the City; Recogr -izing the need for L the annexation of the property, the City Council has entered into a .oind!:,g Annexation Agreement with the property owner and the S.wo developers involved, (Marlborough Development, and Kaufman Broad). and Among the points agreed upon were the items outlined below: I. Annexation and development of the project in the City. 2. Payment of development fees to the City rather than the County. 3. Construction of the project Cou in substantiai conformance with nty appr ovals. App 4. Aoval by the City of the County- approved Planned Community Development Plan Text and Tentative Tract map, with conditions'of approval no more onerous than these imposed by the County. AML PLANNING COPSISSION STAFF REPORT Caryn Planned Community January 9, 1985 Aft Page 3 - I t S. Approval by!'both the City and the developers at the time of annexation of a Development Agreeu- -nt closely patterned after the Annexation Agreement. Planning Commission Action idieauired In order to follow the terms of the agreement, the Planning Commission will need to review and formally act on the following items 1. Review and approval of the ,Caryn Planned Community Development Plan text for. the entire site. As with other planned communities, the provisions of the text will in effect become the zoning for the property; 2. Review and approval of Tentative Tract 12644, Depicting first phase of the project. 3. Review of the proposed Development Agreement. Following Commission action on the three items tonight, your recommendations will be forwarded to the City Council for a first:" reading of the ordinance on January 16, 1985, I1I. CARYN PLANNED COMUNITY /DEVELOPMENT PLAN TEXT Actions Requested: The action requested, the approval of the aryn Planned Community /Development Plan Text, will serve two necessary functions, 1. The Development Plan text and illustrations will become a master alan and a guide for the ultimate development of the property, much in the same way other planned community texts are utilized in the City. 2. Approval,. - of the text will constitute "prezoning" of the9. - - -_ propert; ;:n relation to existing annexation laws. Upon annexation, the "Caryn Planned Community" will automatically become the "zoning" for the site, that is the provisions of the Development Plan text will in effect become the regulatory mechanism guiding future development of t11e site. Current provisions call for a 300 acre minimum in the development of planned communities in the City. The intent is to provide a process for initiation, review, and regulation of large scale comprehensively planned urban communities, but to also afford the maximum flexibility to the developer within the context of an overall development program and specific, phased development plans, coordinated with the provision of necessary .public services and facilities. In this instance, the intent of the planned community provisions can be met on a site smaller than normally required in the City: i PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Caryn Planned Community January 9. 1985 Page 4 1. The site was planned, reviewed and approved by the County, consistent with their development regulations. 2. The site is virtually surrounded by substantial physical barriers such as the flood control lands to the north and west and the proposed Route 30 Freeway on the south. . 3. The project was designed as a master plan,�6d and integrated community from the very 'inception of the project. The community's own special identity is based on a system of open space_ that ties the community together. The t-�rkbone of this open space network is a parkway corridor. It links the north /south pedestrian greenbelts and a neighborhood park; it also connects the community to the major north /south arterials along its boundaries and to the possible future commercial center site.. In order to assure development of the h ^oject in conformance 'with the provisions of the Development Plan, as approved by the County and as outlined in the Annexation Agreem.,�t, the Planned Community approach is desirable, and regulation under^= conventional development district provisions, impractical. Project Description: The entire site slated for annexation and eventual inclusion in the Caryn Planned Community contains approximately 248 acres (Exhibit °811). About 227 acres are under the control of the Caryn Development Company. Negotiations are currently underway by Caryn to acquire several small outpieces for inclusion in the project. While the Caryn Planned Community designation is intended to cover the entire site, Planning Comnision review and approval at this point only encompasses 227 acres and 902 dwellings as outlined in the Development text, '�7-an (Exhibit "C "). If the outpieces are acquired and sup-',- --- -,I- ly incorporated into the project._ design, additional lots ".,611T4[, be created in Phase II and modifications of the Planned Commun4*ty_. text and Planning Comnissicn review will be necessary. The following is a project summary as currently proposed. Caryn Planned Community (Total Site) 248 acres Caryn Planned Community /Development: Plan Provisions 227 acres Number of Dwellings 902 Location - North side of Highland, between Milliken and Rochester ` Current Land Use: Site - vacant North - Vacant East - Vacant, SFR "s South - Vacant, Victoria Planned Community West - 'Vacant Pi.ANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT " Caryn Planned Community January 9, 1485 Page 5 E E G The proposed Planned Commurity would consist predcnjantiy of single tamily dwellings, ,containing 902 units at buil addt of the plan under commis_in w,view.. All homes are to be located on Individual lots of variable size located on cul -de -sacs or closed loop streets which connect to controlled access collector. loops. These in turn lead to the community parkway road or backbone. Arterials abutting the 'Planned Community, ie. Milliken, Rochester, and Banyan, have been sized to accommodate future development to the north of the project, in accordance with the CityGeneral Plan. All streets proposed by the project will be cons`e;,icted at the time of development and dedicated as public streets. To the south of this project, the right -of -way for the Foothill Freeway is preserve.. While this is not a part of the City or County requirements, the property owner has indicated he would consider donating the freeway right -of -way to the City to assist its implementation. The Plane-)d Community is proposed to be developed in two major phases: Phase I encompasses the western portion of the project fiite, Phase II the eastern portion, (Exhibit "Ell). Phase I elready has an approved tentative tract. map by the - County and is planned for single family detached homes. North of the project parkway, 5,500 to 11,000 square foot lots are planed, and south of the parkway, 4,030 to 10,000 square foot lots are planned. The final design for phase II has yet to be finalized and a tentative tract map submitted to the City. However, the Planned Community Development Plan text calls for a- subdivision pattern similar to Phase I. The precise design of the tentative tract map for Phase II will depend in part on i,,,�ether or not the three out parcels can be acquit d and successfully incorporated irto the site layout. Phase I of the project contains approximately 12.5 acres of open space, consisting of both pedestrian greenways and trails connecting the various neighborhood clusters and a centrally located 7 to 8 acre "Caryn Park" that• the property owner %tends to donate to the City. While tbe_, -, entire park area is shown in Phase I, approximately half of the park will actually be developed with the first phase of the project. Exhibit "D" illustrates the proposed park design in concept. Final park plans are yet to be finalized. Site Characteristics: The entire site contains approximate'; 248 acres of land, gent y sloping at approximately 4 1/2 %. The site is vacant, and with the exception of alluvial scrub contains no significant or mature vegetation. The site abutts on the Victoria Planned Community on the south and is defined by the pr *posed Foothill Freeway to the south extensions of Milliken and Rochester to the west and east and by Banyan Avenue or the north. Facts for Firidinos: In order to recommend approval of the _ Planned Community Development Plan text to the City Council, the Planning Commission must determine that the approval of the Planned Comrmunity/Developmtent Plan text shall: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT taryn Planned Community January 9, 1985 Page 6 _ 1. Provide Provide for the development of a comprehensively planned urban community that is superior to development otherwise allowable under alternative regulations. 2. Provide for development that is consistent with the General Plan and with related development and growth management . policies of the City. 3. Provide for the construction, improvement, or extension of transportation facilities, public utilities, and public services required by development within the project area. IV. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 11642 General: The Tentative Tract map submitted for City review has a -ready been aplyr^ved by the County of San Bernardinz The map encompasses Phase 'I of the project, 115 single family lots on 470 acres located in the westerly half of the Planned Community (EXHIBIT G -1). The propcsed tract is divided by the east /west spine street, with each half of the tract built around a closed loop street with a series of cul -de -sacs. These in turn are interconnected by a greenway and trail system, in accordance with the overall concept of the Planned Community. Gradin4 and Drainage: The Grading CommitteL- has reviewed and approver in the conceptual grading plan submitted for TT12642, subjAct to a limitation on the height of slopes not to exceed 201. In addition, review and approval of a final grading plan prior to the issuance of grading permits will be necessary and is recommended as a p;^ovision of tentative tract approval. finally, the design details of the retention basins to th`e east of Phase I must also be submitted prior to grading pormit issuance:. Landscaping: A conceptual landscape plan has been submitted to the city, (Exhibit "H °). A final landscape plan will be required prior to the issuance of permits. V. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT As already noted, the City Council has entered into an Annexation Agreement with the property owner and developers. This agreement outlines the terms of both the annexation and the development of the property. To comp Ty— with the provisions of State Law, a separate Development Agreement will be required upon annexation to the City, The draft Development Agreement, attached for your review, implements the Annexation Agreement provisions. It is virtually D Ll �r z PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT' Caryn Manned Community January 9 148E Page 7 -- - identical to the approved Annexation Agreement, except that the provisions dealing wit5r annexation of the properly have been eliminated. The princl,ples of the agreement are that any duplicate approvals of the pr(Ject be consistent with City format, but that there be rio conditions more onerous than those contained in the original C�ui:ty approvvals and that certain fees would not be applied to the properiy (Systems fee and Beautification fee). The Park fee and Storm Brain fee would not be assessed: since extensive storm drains and park and open space impr „vements are part of the development approvals. The owners of-' the property agree with inclusion in the landscape, and street lighting - maintenance` districts as ; -xell as in the Day Creek Mello Roos District. Owner also agrees to payment of all school fees. Ail negotiated points are contained in the Development Agreement. VI. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATUS A detailed Enviro.wental Ane'ysis Report was prepared by the County of San Bernardino at the time, of County review of the project. The report Focused o6'environmental topica identified during the review process, including geology, flood control and drainage, circulation, noise, air quality, community services and public utilities. As a result of -the reveew, the county issued a mitigated negative declaration for the projects, The City staff was involved in the review process and, worked closely with the County on development of appropriate modifications to mitigate potential environmental effects. All these modifl%_.tions have since been incorEarated into the project 1 and its conditions of approval. T light of the above, Staff has prepared a new Initial Stud,,.__, _ (Exhibit "um) addressing the potential for environrcentai effects of the project as modified, and identified no impacts that could be considered significant. Consequently,. the issuance of a Negative Declaration is recnrmended Vat. CORRESPONDENCE /PUBLIC IN^UT I The items associated with this project have been advertised in 1 the Daily Report, a newspaper of general circula.ion for a public hearing. To date, w�v correspondence has been 'received on the Project. VIII. RECOMMENDATUrNS The Planning Commission should review and hold a public hearing - PLANNING COMIMISSION STAFF REPORT - ,. C:r;n- Planned Zomr;u sif3 - January g,` 1985 Page, 8 - _ on tine items outlined. in this report. Subsequent to the�.hparing, the following actions are recammnended: Adopt Resolution recommending approval of the Caryri Planned Community Development Plan text, pre- 4oning the entire 248 acre site, to the City Council. 2. Adopt Resolution conditionally approvirg Ttentatiye Tract 12642, depict -ing first phase of this project. 3. Adopt Resolution reccmn;+--nding approval of the draft Development Agreement to the City Council. Respectful ley submil t'-ZI, Rick Gomez, City Planner RG:OK :cv attachments Exhibits: Planned Commnunity /Development Plan Text (Attached separately) "A" - Lncation Map "8f - Planning Area Boundaries PIVI - Development Plan Boundaries I'D" Park Plan HVI - Pha!*-Ig Pt-an °F" . :Site Utilization (TT 12642) Cradirg/Tract Map Grading /Tract Map - Landscape Plan, ITT 12642) _ "I- 1..20" Elevations - Initial Study Resolutions: Res -1utIon recommending approval of Planned Community, with conditions. Resolution approving TT 12642, with conditions. Resolutioa recommending approval of - :Development Agreement with draft development agreement. of -- PARK - e A AY GQRq x i _ NOT A RESMEWTIAL REMENVAC ` - IN.A.P. ;06 -NiLL 6vt c6AR i w U 0 j i f i I DEER CANYON - DAY CANYOn COUNTYYQFSANBERNARDINO CIM11F RANCHO CUCAFdONGA V- ��•.I�. �.�. SP HEREOFINFLUENCE CITY OF RANCHO ^T�� / CUCAMONGA CHAFFEY COLLEGE BANYAN ,AVE. PROPOSED Ya! ®® AY ITE �T FOOTHILL FREEW Y� II ® ®i11I�i an oft Y HIGHLAND AVE OO®1 /NI'iLl BRrm o BASELINE AVE, PLANNED. °° :COMMUNITY , qh FOOTHILL BLVD. 'r WN a > _ LU a z �` ¢3 W Y W = w 2 Q 2 e O <� 1 i f JAN _ BERNARDINO FREE AY V MIRM EXHIBIT 2 VIC:; My MAP PROPERTIE-S AT UILLIKEN AND HIGHLAND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AOL J �i 7- r. a fry Wk, -S z !AtCEtIPAMEL E I Ez� x EXHIBIT 1,5ASE MAP PROPERTIES AT MILLIKEN AND HIGHLAND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY. CALIFORNIA al 31 r ti .Rtr ..f+' RESIDENTIAL! �`► f- sJRE51DEVTIAI 'C �' ,! I ; ! `4 p'•` 327/G,T� PAA >< II LOTS f D, fb J ' i� _ - �!" � +„ -•S-r -`�8 LOTS,, i..t.. i,,, � '- •�.-�, iL----- ---^. e - — — �. I.fir -w•- 's r L� NOT 105 i yi? A Y 7TLS1`- j 8a: PART I`�- "�'�✓DENTIALw h r - jF��•� OUTPl1RCELS '_ I l.CEO GEND ® M PHASE LINE r LLL i AS.4ERHA4tVE LOT LAYOUT SWtTH STATE R.O.W. wURCHa1S1E8 EXHIBIT 5 PROd'i�f PHASING PLAN PROPERTIES AT MILLVEN AND HIGHLAND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY , CALIFORNIA ,i Ida 2 U) U 0 W Q a w ft _1 Qlit LL F-p —! p-E x M 6ut1. a h o 4 r � z r' ntr ' ^a�eul fF`la? NAHVI ' L• cv t ci zr H W � } I s•� -.�:., -.1 OVA } - 'hm OVA . �. ne,��i -- t I In 7 L o � �i 1 r .V/ _ OE �'ND /1�.7.ffi '�Q +'9 NYiti `139MM1 �KL P� iN/"� r .V/ 77 C W Q 2i Q b Z A ' � 4 f mss'. 77 C W Q 2i Q b Z A ' i r 1 •t �Y 'a) l N .i. S wig 1� = i t i al�i "U Ht 44 i /�-•'• dJ j� � p� i' g� i t I Z t t I Y y uu��1 titi � t 4, iA Its ate t 333 j' iF $9�§� n - 45a y y.4't HR as gg �i L OP 1 tq F a{a{ }I.F �� al,Frldi3t to ~j s z 0 a W' t W O S� .fj) a 0 j .-� al mo VJ vt off' »� �s P ;r v i I t I 3 3 �, 1= ik R r iS �.. i� Y � ' e _ i r i a t i -_� e ~} +�...�4 3 �: t . I i �. � 4 ;, �? �:�: .._. r +ryxses �a iii }i >• . cfi ii�ly�i ter, v _p 1 _r �1 1 1 1 C; ,t r -T. Mp JiI I t e r L' tj 1 s o© if i- r i Clam r }' �fpC7p €ppp Don a ©0000 i �� 3 6 �. :.�.:..":: R � t bl-nill , MEN" b .g L_ ,u IN e r�z I f 1 f LID 3b_ l -1- E 5 D� 1 01 E9 I� ;11 ' ill /ll t�x 1 t I r �It 5 �f $ P i lu ff rt Mill •1 i1 - ! Im i e r A i r It fr T AIL JED <p � 1 V ❑❑ r yy �' Dor ' DE30 # Y { �. �•A - A IT is i � e y _ r. moo® A e Z-A -- -. I L 4 a Irf i } a., —i /i I .-k oQ 3 3771 � S f j 7 ti 71 Au 4 --- c r3 s, rr f � � 9MMM, 1 s �4 J WIN �R s _ � ,f ii — I.-7j�r a �R s _ � ,f ii — I.-7j�r a ii — I.-7j�r a .1 ST Yee is �Ei l f I u-', I ■ l®r, ! 11A �k !} r r_ 4 r s s - j Iy y, 1 I y + T Ila , Ask ED I t ❑QC3 Q4� d I L7 E-1 ---� --�- is -�-Y- 3�» r �= 3 n IR i �71 TI IL a .r r I l� } l ,r� ' R I �1 I > - 1 i i r F it E v ?MMON LTL REV a . r APPLICATION O, O 1973 GENERAL For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development 'Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Planning Division staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study and make recommendations to Planning Commission. The Planning Commission will make one of three determinations: (1) The project will 'have no significant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, Q) T'ne project will have a. significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will,, a orepared, or (3) An additional information report should be supplied by`t:,= applicant giving further information concerning' the proposed project, Date Filed: I Project Title: it Applicant's Name, Address, Telephone: Name, Address, Telephone of erson To Be Contacted Concerning this Pro3zct_• ts- --L A r~ rr _ 7a Location of Project.. t << < h q h Assessor's Parcel No.�' '?� )��' %�', ► � !`, i3; /�, ! a., :21 -f 2 �+ List other permits necessary froas local regio ai, state -a d federal agencies ant, the a envy issui g such permits:�� r►.a- PROJECT DESCRIPTEDN Proposed use or proposed project• i Acreage of project area and s�uare faatage of existing and proposed buildings, if any: f Describe the environmental settinc of the project site including information on topography, soll stability, plants (trees), land animals, any _cultural, historical or scenic aspects, land use of surrounding properties, and the description of any existing structures and their use (att ch ne essary sheets): rs s �1 WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO 1.. Create a substantial change in ground contours? �X , 2. Create a substantial change 'ir, existing noise of produce vibration or glare? t}( 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? 4. Create changes in the existing Zoning or General Plan designations? 5. Remove any existing trees? Now many ?-22tg— - ft.E, 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentiall,v hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammatles or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above (attach additional` sheets if necessary): e �0—. d1V Al" c C neA -� C YQ 7. Estimate the amount of sewage and solid waste materialu this project wii" generi.te daily j011:1 171fD -sal 1,OA p 8. Estimate the number of auto and truck trips generated daily by this project: _ -i? ®D 9. Estimate the amount of grad;n (cutting and 'filling) required for this project, in cubic yards: !!5`D 0 lob 4. If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I 'hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true aad correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. ': further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Planning Division. Date Signatur Title ,4 �✓' l ;C tom. RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The following informat on should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga l Planning Division in. order to aid the school district in asserirg 'their ability to accommodate the proposed residential development. Dev.lopers are � required to secure letters from the school district for accommodating the increased number of students prior to issuance of building permits, Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No,:,,�� Specific Location of Project: Mi if. PHASE r PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL 1. Number of sis:gle family units: 2. Number of multiple family units: 3. Date proposed to begin construction: ftsr- kS� AM 4. Earliest date of occupancy: Model and ii of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price Range J -4 n ADDENDUM-TO INITIAL STUDY PART It I1. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation (i.e., of affirmative answers to the Bove questions plus a iscussion of proposed mitigation measures). The project site is located t.,7thin a City adopted. earthquake fault zone based upon the inferred locv,,:ion of the, Red Hill fault, hence could expose people or property to geologic hazards. Ceotechnical' studies prepared for adjacent projects to the sout?s and southwest indicate chat ground rupture by faulting is remote. These studies cone ded that' io. mitigation mesure ,were necessary and no setback restrictions for residences were proposed. on -site geotechnical investigations have ?jijt indicated the presence of the fault on the site. Therefore, based upon these studies, the preponderance of evidence indicates the risk of potential ground rupture : from faulting is low, therefoee no significant impact or mitigation measures are warranted. 2. a.b.c.i. The project site is located on a gently sloping alluvial wash traversed by several ephemeral strear. channels. Day Creek, which is subject to flooding, is located to the east.. Day Creek Channel is currently Aft unimproved and could expose people or property to flooding in the easterly half (Phase II) of this Planned Community. Storm water facilities will be provided as part of the development. phase i on�site storm water and off -site sheet flow will be directed west to the rece.\tly improved Deer Creek Channel. Phase II on -site drainage will be direcx to Day Creek via the Highland Avenue spreading grounds at the southeast corner of the site. 5.a The proposed Planned Community will contain up to 958 dwellings at buildout of the current proposed plan which will significantly alter the density, diversity and growth rate of the area. Large scale mister_ developments are also proved or tc the west and south a planned p P within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The proposed development, has been planned in accordance with the goals and directives of the County's Community Plan. 6.a. The proposed Planned Community will contain approximately b;, Wellings which will significantly change the local economic diversitlr, fax rate and property values. These Impacts are considered positive 'changes rather than adverse impacts upon the local area. 7.a. Development of approximately 958 dwellings represents, a substantial change of the present undeveloped land use. The proposed Planned Community has been planned in accordance with the goals and directives of the County's Community Plan. k Page 7 _ III . ` DETER!4MTIOtd On the basis of • }his initial evaluation: _. I find the proposee project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the eavironment.; and a14ZGATIVE DECLARATION Will be prepared. I find that although thy- -roposed project could have a significant XX *ffect on the enviromet )there will not be a significa--at effect in this cage because the mdtigat.:on measures described on air attached sheet 1^.ave been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WMt BE FREPARER I find the proposed project NWI have a significant effect on the envirnmem , and an E iONt'MMT IHPACT REPORT is required. Date January 11�1985 Signature lCity Planner Title t� r Page 4 HhYBE NO Substantial depletion ARL e. of any noitrenewabla =or a-are* natural reaource? X 3.4. Manaatou r udinas of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade; the quality of the environment„ subetanv�aliy reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife populations to drop below self sustaining levels, threatan to eliminate a plant or animal .=mmunity;;ireduce the number or restrict the range of a';tare or eiidangeted plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X N b. Does the project have rice potential to achieve short- terse, to,the disaii-c 4tage of long - term, environmental ,goals? (A shamterm,impact.on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of tLae while long- term impacts will endure well into the future). X a. Does the project have impacts which are I Individually li=1',ted, but cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection winh the effects of past projects, and probable future p=jtcts). d. Does the project have environmental effects \ - which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, eit�-ar directly or indirectly? I1. DISSUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (i.e., of affirmative answers t--0- , the above questions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures ). SEE ADDENDUM. AD, ANOUM'TO INITIAL STUDY PART IT Jr. Disca5sion of Environmental Evaluation (i.e,, of affirmative answers to the above questions plus a d-iscuss on of proposed mitigation measures). The project site is located within a City adopted earthquake fault zone based upon tY,e inferred location of the Red Hilt fault, hence could expose people or- property to geologic hazards. Geotechnit studies prepared for adjacent projects to the south and southwest indicate that ground rupture by -faulting is remote. These studies concluded that no mitigation mesures were necessary and no setback restritions for residences were proposed. - On -sine geotecbnicai inve,tigations have not indicated the presence of the fault on the site. Therefore, based upon these studies, the preponderance of evidence indicates ti +e risk of potential ground rupture from faulting is low, therefore no :Agnificant impact or mitigation measures are warranted. 2. a.b.c.i. The project site is located on a gently sloping alluvial wash traversed by several ephemeral stream channals. Day Creek, which is subject to flooding, is located to the east:. Day Creek Channel is currently , unimproved and could expose people or property to flooding in the easterly half .(Phase II) of this Planned Community, St rm water facilities will be provided as part of the development. Phase I as -site storm water and off -site sheet flow will be directed west to the recently improveO Deer Creek Channel, Phase II on -site drainage will be directed to Day Creek via the Highlend Avenue spreading grounds at the southeast corner of the site, 5.a The proposed Planned Community will contain up to 958 dwellings at buiidout of the current proposed plan which will significantly alter the density, diversity and growth rate of the area. Large scale miter planned developmanzs are also apprnved or proposed lo thz west and sauth. within the City of Rancho Cucamon,q --- The proposd, evelopment, has been planned in accordance with the 'goals anU directives of the 'County's Community Plan. 6.a. The proposed Planned Community will contain, approximately 958 dwellings which will significantly change the local e- Qnomic diversity, tax rate and property values. -These impacts are tins dered positive changes rathew &an adverse impacts upon the local area. 7,a, Developc -mt of approximately 958 dwellings represents a substantial change of thG present undeveloped land use. The proposed Planned Comnuq!rtty has been planned in accordance with the goal, and directives of the Q nty's Community Plan. - Page 5 ITS MAYBE NO 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. 'PuE obstruction or degradation of any scenic vista or view? X _ b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive X size? c. A conflict with the objective of designated or potential scenic corridors? �^ �� X 12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal have a significant need for new systems, or alterations to the following: a. Electric power? X b. Natural. or packaged gas? X c. Comaunications systems? Y X d. Water suFaly? _ X e. Wastewater facia. <ties? X X f. Flood ccntrol structures? g. Solid waste facilities? x _ h. Fire protection? X I i. Police protection? J. Schools? r k. Parks or other recreational facilities? 1. Maintenance of public facilities, including X roa 's and flood control facilities? m. Other governmental services? 13. Energy and Scarce tsources. Will the proposal have significant results int. a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? X _ 3. Substantial increase in demand upon existing ?( sources of energy? ; c. An increazi is the demand for development of new sources of energy? _ d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumption of non - renewable fords of energy, then fearible X renewably aources.of energy are ak..:ilable?' _ Page 6 YES e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or MAYBE :NO scarce natural' resource? X 14. Mandatory Finatngs --of Significance. a. Does the project have,the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, rubstantially reduce the,babitat of fish or wildlife species,, causes a'fiah or Vildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten t, elimivate a plant or' animal community, rctiute the number or restrict tine range of a rare or endauasred plant or aA'pal or eliminate important examples of the rzjor periods of California history cc prehistory? X b. Does the project :ave tae potential to so'Aieve {i short, -term, to ti: disadvantage of long- term, ff environmental goats? (A short -term impact-on the environment is one which occurs.in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long - C term 5 acts will endure well into the future). X_ c. Does the project have impacts which are �Mdividi,,ally limited, but cumulatively bnsidei4ble? (Cumulatively considerable _ means that the ingremental effects of an Individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with-the-effects of past projects, and probable future projects). X d. Does the project have envionmental effects which will cause sysa*:antial adverie effects ou human beings, eitna dirantly,or indirectly? X II. DISCUSSION OF EMRONHENTAL p74LUATION i.e., of affirmative answers''to" the above questions plus a dis.;Jssion of proposed mitigation measures). SEE : :!'MDENDUM. �I i PASS 4 YES HAMM 100 S. 't`ransportatioa. VM the prAppsal have significant resolts tat s. Generation of ^�&bstant!.-a a4ditional vehickax zsonemmt7 b. Fff.cts on existing streets, or demand for X ner sereet construction? c. Effects on existing. parking facilities, ..,,r X dmand for new parking? 6. Substantial impact upon .euistin$.zrah1porta- tion systems? X e. Alterations tJ present pattexns of circula- tion or ticvement of people and/or goods? r f. Alterations to or effects on present and potential -water - borne, rail, n #$ transit or X air traffic? S. T.. ncreaS25: I= u affic z...� -,��o to =t--r VA- 43 bicyclists or pedestrians? _ 4. Cultural Resources, Vill the proposal hare ANIL significant results in: a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological„ paleontological, 'vd /or 3istorical rese,irces? 10. Health, Safety, and Nuisance Factors. WilI thi proposal have significant results ins a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health i 'hazard ?_.____ 1 b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? c. A risk of explosion or reler., -;e of hazardous l substances in the event of an accident? Y d. An increase in the nueiber of Individuals or species cf vector or pathenogenic L. organ_fsms or the ezy�sure of peoyl_e to such ' organisms? e. Increase in exisring noise levels? X _ f.- Ixposure of people to potentially d.agexGus noise levels? X r„ S. The creatfon of objectionable odors? � X b. An inaresse in ;s t or Slara? C. Introductico of mm or disruptive species of Plants astu an area? u, Reduction ft ttse Potential for agricultural 1timi? Fasaa. Will Lhe pruposaL. have a£Sni€icant results In: Page 3 :' MMZ HQ $ X a. Change is the Characreristiex of species, including diversity, distribu=c n, or numbers of any species of w-' ? x b. Reduction of the numbers of jay unique, rare or eadanger&d species of ani—I ? C. Tntroduction 5f saws. or dii- aptive species of ani Is ill an area, or restal.t iu'& bv=,ier to the migration or Savermt of aaim tQF d. !!steriaratian or removal of existing fish at vildlife habLtat? I- P't:.s? ahem. 'Will, the proposal have signifi :oat re= 5 iar: T. 6811 the proposal alter tka loczaiou, Vsts„- bu,%iris, density, diversity, or growth =te oZ the bw= population of as area? b. 'Will erne proposal affect~ existing housing, or create a demand for additional hov<ng ?' S. 5oclo- Ecanomie Faeroes. Viii the proposal have sigaificxrit results in- a. Ch=Se in local 6v region:OL socie- economic chJrac2C :;Istfn - --teladins ecouamic ors comwm—Ul, diversity, :ax rate, and proprzty values? b. VM project costs tee esiuitably distribateA among project beneif r;Sews, i.e., buyers, tar payers or project usars? 7. %ad Use and P- toning GooaWarations. Will the proposal have slgaiflcaat results in? a. A subs*anzial alyerztl= of the present or piedd land use of in area? JM b. A conflict vith any desigrarious, objectives, polizien, or adopted plans of any governsental ¢nom? c. An Is pact up= she quialzy or quantV t of odst in 'tine or moc<- caaswVtIve recreational o it€es? — —� X X x x X X X CITY or RANCHO CUCAMONGA PART II - 111t la STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST' DATE: ; A1PPLICc+NT: CARYN DEVELOPMEO COMPANY TT 126f +2 FILING DATE: 17 /l' %R�4 LOG Nim m DDA 84-05 PROJECT: CARYN PLANNED CAMUNIii - 958 dwelling units on 248 acres pre -zone an - t enza eve race map approva r. has-e .- PROJECT LOCATION: NEC Millikurt and Highland I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "mayb_' answers are requ$red on ati,.acCed sheets). YES MAYBE NO 1. Soil and Geology, Will :'Ae proposal have significant resul�s in: a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes is geologic relationshi -ps? __ X b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or burial of the soil? X c. Change in topography or ground surface } contour intervals? d. The destructiont covering or rodi£`.cation of any unique gerlogic or physical features? _ e. Any pctentiax Increasain wind or water I erosion of soils, affecting either on or off X site conditons? f. C;,anges in erosion siltation, or deposition? X I Expo3ure of people or property w geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, s..sd- zlides, ground failure, or slmilar hazards? X h. Fez increase in the Mate of extraction and/or use of any mineral resource? Xq i. _ Ajdrologs*. Will the proposal have signific?ant results in: page 2 Yx3 MAYBE M a. Changes in currents, or the %� ;)urse of direction of flo streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream channels? X b. Changes in absorption rates!, drainage patterns, or the raC:,t and amount of surface water rcmoff? X c. Alterations to the course or flaw of floo'_ waters? X d. Change in the amount of surface water in any body of water? X e. Discharge into surface waters, or any - k .teration of - surface water quality? X f. Alteration of groundwater ebaracteristics? IL g. Change in the quantity of groundwaters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interference with an aqui,er? Quality? Quantity? X h. The seduction iY the amount of water othet- wise ava:Lable for public water supplies? _ X I. Exposure of people or property to Crater related hazards such as flooding or seiches? � 4 3. Air Quality. Will the proposal have significant rasults in: a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile I or indirect aourcea? Stat3or.� °-x sources? Xr b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and/or Interference with the attainme=nt of applicable air quality standards? X c. Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? X 4. BioL Flora. Will the proposal have significant xesslts Alft In: a. Change in the characteristi *.Ss of species, Including d1versity, distribution, or number X of any spsxies of plants? ,.. b. Reduction of the numbers of,any unique, rare x,. i :. nr<znd�ctaare� xnnMaa of te4�Y.rc? i 7.c. The proposed Planr2s' Carnunity will contain 16+ acres of open space and -� greenbelts, including acres intended as a memorial park site which will f significantly improve recreation opportunities in the area, 8. a.b.g:, DevelopmeQ of the proposed Planned Community will significantly increase vehicular` movement creating demand for new street construction and increasing traffic, hazards. ;•'Street improvements, includin6 proper signalization and signing, will be pr..Jed_fas part of the development. In addition, a trail system will also be constructed that will link with the City of. Rancho Cucamonga and regional trail; systems. Both of these improvements will substantially improve traffic circulation in the area. 10.f The project site is located adjacent to the proposed Foothill (Freeway which could produce noise levels that are potentially dangerous to futture residents..," A Noise Impact Study was prepared for the Vlhich recommended site design measures to achieve an acceptable' noise environmant. These mitigation rrasures will be. incorporated into each level of project design. 12.' f.h.i,J.k. The Vraposed Planned Community will create significant need for the following utility and public services: flood control structures, fire t protectinn, police protection, schools and parks. Storm drain facilities will be constructed 'as a part of the development. The proposed master plan includes provision for 16+ acres of open space and park land, including a trail system. The developer has agreed to work w th the school district to provide a temporary or permanent-school M6,, and to pay fees sufficient to provide :temporary classroom facilitiess. A potential school site is the ;acre park site located'irr the center of` he- Community. Fire and police protection services are contracted and wo.a d require additional. funding to expand service to accomodate proposed ;' development. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DISTRICT CHANGE NO. 84 -05 TO PREZONE THE DISTRICT DESIGNATION AS "CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY " AND ADOPTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR APPROXIMATELY 248 ACRES LOCATED BETWEEN THE EXTENSION OF BANYAN AVENUE AND HIGHLAND AVENUE ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH, AND BETWEEN THE EXTENSION OF ROCHES'T'ER AVENUE AND MILLIKEN -AVENUE ON THE EAST AND WEST. r- � WHEREAS, the City of;;Rancha Cucamonga, California, has ,initiated' proceedings for the Change oi'` Organitation (annexation),; for the ab�jyY described property pursuant to Section 56I95 of the California Government Code, and WHEREAS, the City of Rancho. Cucamonga, California desires to prezona the above described uni'ncorporatd territory pursuant to Section 65859 of the California Government Code, and WHEREAS, on the 9th day of January, 1985, the Planning Commission Adft held a iuly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Cade. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: A. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size,'° and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and S. That this prezoning will provide for the developrt_�nt of a comprehensively planned � +urban community within the District that is superior to development otherwise allowable under alternate regulations. C. That this prezoning will provide for development within- the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development and growth management policies of the City. D. That this prezoning will provide for the construction, improvement, or extension of transportatiM_,fac;lities, public utilities and public services required by developmertt with the District. rz - e E. That this t - prezoning is consistent with the objectives of the Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. F. This prezoning; would not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this project -will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recJmmends issuance of a Xegative Declaration on January 9, 1.985. , NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED; 1. That pursuant to Section 58350 to,;65859 of the CalllfoHia Government Code, that the Manning Commission .4f the City'of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 9th day of January, 1985:; of District Change No. 84 -05 and Development Plan text. 2. That a Certified Copy of thin Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Couneil. APPROVE!` AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAM OF JANUARY, 1985. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY`OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA:' i BY: Dennis. L. Stout, Chairman ' ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy : cretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Cogmissio�t of the City, of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted, by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular -qeat:ng +if the Planning r.ummission held on the 9th day of January, 1985, by the following voce =.ta -wit: PLANNED COMMUNITY CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ,7 BUILDING AOD SAFETY 1. A preliminary soils report shall be filed with and approved by the Building Official prior to recordation of the final map.. Z. A geology report, prepred by a licensed engineering geologist, shall be Filed with and approved by the Building Official. The report shall have been reviewed by a licensed geologist and the costs of such review will be billed to the developer and paid in full prior to recordation of the final map. 3. Grading plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Grading Co` mi ttee. 4. Obtain a demolition permit for building to be demolished, Underground structures must be broken in, back filled and inspected before covering. 5. Submit plans and obtain building permits for walls. 6. Grading concepts as they relate to maximum slope height and property line location at the top of slope for Phase IT development shall be cr:.sistent with those approved for Phase T» PUBLIC SERVICES 7. Sewage disposal shall be by connection to Cucamonga County Water District Severs. 8. Tte water purveyor shall be Cucamonga County Mater District. 9. The following are the steps t must be completed to meet the requirements for installation a� .,or finance of the on -site /off -site water system and /or sewer system. A. Where the system is to be installed prior to recordation: The water system, fire hydrants, and/or sewer system shall be installed in accordance with requirements of the State Health and Safety Code, and in accordance with plans approved by the water and /or sewering utility and the governing fire protection authority. The plans shah be reviewed by a Civil Engineer.. regi'ster,A in the State of California, and contain requi certificates and approval signatures. It is the developer's responsibility to s:amit to the Engineering Division a copy of the approved plan and a signed Statement from the utility of Jurisdiction confirming that the improvement has been installed and accepted.' B. Where a bond is to be posted in lieu of instgllation of the- improvement: 1. The domestic water plan, avd /or sewer plan which meets the reainirements of the State Health and Safety Code shall be reviewed by a Civil: Engineer, registered in the State of California, and approved by the water ur sewering utility and the governing fire i~ *otection authority. The plans shall contain the required certificates and approval signatures. A copy of, the approved plan shall be submitted to the City Engineering Division. Z. Said engilieer shall determine the mount of bond necessary to install the improvements. a. This amount plus ten percent shall be posted with the City. A. statement signed by the engineer stating that the amount of band recommended is adequate to cover the cost of installation of the improvement shall be included with the ( estimate and submitted to the City Engineering Division. L b. Or, '?n cases where the water agency or se-ering agency is a governmental subdivisiron, the bond in ',iZ amount of 110 perce t of the cost u• installation of the improvement may be praced with the agency. A :signed statement from that a(- ,nc1 stating that finan,-;al ', arrangements have been completed shall be sub, -' ted it the City Engineering Division. s. Prior to release of the bond for the :mprsvemeni, the utility of jurisdiction shall submit a signed statement confirming that the improvemen` hat been installed and meats � %? requirements .nf all appropriate Mate and County laws, J;taining to such inorovemeit. It is the developer's tespowsibility that such signed statem:nt is filed with the City Engineering 9ivision. 1G. An acoustical study shall be performed to assess noise levels at.ahe- development and shal. be reviewed and approved by the Planning Divisio %i P 'nr to recordation. Detailed noise analysis and precise mitigatf�zti measures shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to recoroation. Tae acoustical study will use based on available profi;e and design data�of proposed route 30 Ilan at the time of tertative map approval. Prior cc the issuance of building permits, a report stating that the recommended mitigation measures have been implemented shall be submitted to the Planning Division and the building plans shall be so certified by the acoustical engineer. 11. Any abandoned wells on the property or simmer structures that might result in contamination of underground waters shall be dastroyed in a manner approved by the County Department of Environmental Health Services. 12. Ali building construction shall lie designed and built tc, 45 dB(A) interior sound attenuation level. II. 13. Use of village perimeter masonry fencing along Miiliken- Avenue and ttie `: south property line to provide privacy and noise shielding. An approximately 0 foot high masonry wall or combination 8 foot high berm and masonry wall will be provVed per approval of an acoustical engineer prior to recordation of first tract: The wall can be less than 8 feet high if noise levels do not exceed 45 +18(A) Ldn interior, 65 dB(A) Ldn exterior. If the barrier is g; ^eater that 8 feet, then a.>berm will be used to make up the height greater than ,,P feet where grades permit. FIRE PROTECTION 14. Prior to recordation of the first tract, the following- shall be accomplishedi A. Fire flow requirements shall be 1,750 g p.m. B. Fire hydrant spacing shall be 400 feet. C. The Caryn Company shall - contribute proportionally (based upon impact) to the construction of a fire station facility, and the manning of the fire station for the first year. D. The Caryn Company shall contribute proportionally (based upon impacts) to the purchase of fire 3quipnent (apparatus to man said station). E. Adhere to all standard Foothill Fire District conditions. 15. The above- referenced project is protected by the Foothill Fire Protection District., Prior to construction occurring on any parcel, the owner shell contact the fire department for verification of current fire protectIO-O.developmnnt requirements. 16. All new construction shall comply with applicable ssctions of the Uniform Fire Ccde. 17. The street address shall be posted with a minimum of three (3) -inch- numbers, visible from th3 street, prior to occupancy. 18. Each chimney used in conjunction with any fireplace or any heating appliance in which solid or liquid fuel is used shall be maintained with an approved spark arrester. An approved spark arrester shall mean a device constructed of 'stainless steel, aluminum, copper or brass, woven galvanized wire mesh, nineteen (19) gauge minimum with three - eighths (3/8) incfi minimum to one -half (1/2) inch maximum openings, mounted in or over all outside flue openings in a vertical or near vertical position, adequately supported to prevent movement and visible from the around. 19. A11, flammable vegetation shall be removed from each building site a minimum distance of thirty (30) feet. -3- 20. Development shall provide for safe and ready access for fire'and other-- _ emergency equipment, and for routes of escape which will safely handle evacuations. 21. An access road shall be provided within fifty feet of all buildings if the natural grade between the access roan and building is in excess of thirty percent (30X). Where the access roadway cannot be provided, approved fire protection system or systems shall be.provided as required and approved by the fire department. 22. Roadways shall have a minimum vertical clearance of thirteen feet six inches (13' 611). 23. A turnaround shall b,,- provided at the nd of each roadway, and shall be approved by the fire department. 24. All fire flow requirements aru over and above the average daily consumption of water, and the minimum residual pressure shall be twenty (20) psi. 25. The required fire flow shall be determined by appropriate calculations, using the latest edition of the Insurance Services Office (ISO), "Guide' for the Determination of Required Fire Flow 26. The developer or his engineer shall furnish thz fire department with two copies of water system improvement plans phere fire protection water systems are required. 27. Adequate provisions shall be made to intercept and conduct the offisite tributary drainage flow around or through the site in a manner which will not adversely affect adjacent or downstream properties. 28. Ail lots should drain to streets. If lots do not drain to streets, the cross -lot drainage will be reviewed and, approved by the Grading Committee. ENGINEERTNG 29� Adequate Drainage Easements (Minimum twelve (12) feet wide) shall be provided over the natural drainage courses and /or drainage facilities. The easements shall be designed to contain the 100 -year frequency storm flew plus bulking and freeboard per County Flood Control Standard Criteria. 30. Milliken Avenue shall be designed as as water - carrying street_ and its water carrying capacity shall be maintained. 31. Adequate rolls shall be provided on the entrance roads to the site at Milliken Avenue to minimize the possibility of street'flow entering the site. E 32. Lots adjacent to water - carrying streets shall be adequately elevated l above the top of curb, or black walls provided, or both,, to minimize the possibility of street flows entering the lots. s 04_ ij' 33. In addition to the Drainage Requirements stated hereln, other "on -sitew { or "off- s',te" improvements may be required wHch cannot be detern"4ned i from tentative plugs at this time and would have to be reviewed after more complete improvement plans and profiles have been submitted to this office. 34. 35. 36. 37. U. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. The conceptual drainage p'an has been approved by the City Engineer. Conditions 34 to 39 and 49 and 50 refer to and are intended to implement the conceptual drainage plan. The protective berm shorn on Phase 2 shall bs extended to preclude the additional sheet overflow, from the west fr-A entering the parcel. Temporary and permanent drainage improvements will to required per the developer's engineer's drainage plan, dated April 6, 1984, to intercept and conduct the larger drainage flows through the site in an approved manner. Note: Design criteria call for a minimum pipe size of 18 inch diameter. The proposed interceptor channel and levee within the County: Flood Control District rights -of -way north of the proposed development shall be realigned such ":hat flows will not be ntercepted at right angles and the channel has a.g nimum slope of 1 1/2% or greater. The channel shall be designed to contain 100 -year storm flows plus bulking and freeboard per Cr:�nty Standard Criteria. The proposed interceptor, channel shall dewater into phase 2 approximately 500 feat east of the west phase 2 boundary. A debris basin shall be provided at the inlet of the proposed conduit which will conduct the tributary flows through phase 2. Of a Q 0 closed conduit system is to be used to conduct the tributary flows trough the site, the developer's engineer shall show the overflow path for the differential flow (QJOO Q QQ)� through the development on appropriate mapping prior to clearance byt Engineering Division. The developer .shall enter into an agreement with the County Flood Control District assuming maintenance, operation, and, liability responsibilities associated with the proposes; interceptor levee(s), channel(s), conveyance facilitir; ;, and debris basin(s). In addition, the agreement shall address the timing and cost of levee and channel 7 removal (at the developer's expense) when the need for same no Longer exists. 100 -year storm flows tributary to and from the sit shall be conducted to Day Creek Basin in compliance with the Day Creek System Plan. The developer shall have this site annexed into the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Community 'Facilities District No. 84 -1 for the improvement of the Day Creek Sys ",. The District has been formed under the Mello - Roos Community Facile es Act of 1982. -5- 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. .sr. fa r: Day Creek Basin shall, -be improved to the satisfaction of County Flood Control District as shown in Bill Mann and Associates' "Report --n the nay, Etiwanda, and San Sevaine Creeks System Drainage r1laW'. try• the excavation shown in the plan is not adequate to maintain or reduce the peak flog rates from Day Creek into Riverside County, then adequate excavation of Winevilip or Riverside Basin shall be a`complishzd. Sufficient excavation (storage ce"acity) must be created by the developerlowner to accep�:: the increme0tal increase in volume produced by a 100 -year storm and volume of water produced by 100 -year storm after development is f'ur`y built out. This reference is to, excavate sufficient capacity to accommodate each phase as that phase is begun. Any cost will be credited to Mello -Roos up to 100%. A permit will be required for any encroachment or construction of drainage facilities on. Flood Control District right -of -way, and a minimum of six (6) weeks processing time should be allowed, Minimum paved width access road to Highland Avenue other than required above shall bv- 40 feet for a distance of 109 feet north of the intersection with Highland Avenue. The project parkway road shall be designed and constructed to modified local road standa:^ds satisfactory to tae City Engineering Division as shown in the approved Planned Community i .xt. Retention will be provided to decrease the develoaed peak flows into Day Creek 'to an acceptable am °ts`t as determined by County flood Control Department. 49. Both phase I and Phase II will be protected from a 100' -year storm as determined by criteria established by the City Engineering Division. 50. Site development will not incrementally add to the velocity, magnitude or concentrations of runoff affecting downstream properties except into facilities approved by County Flood Control. 51. Drainage from the project site (Phases I and II) shall be direeted to Day Creek, there shall not be any release of flows into the Deer Creek Channel. 52. Dedications shall be made by final map of ail interior street rigi:ts -of- way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. 53. Dedication shall be made of the following rights- of-eay on the f0lowing streets: 67 -75 additional feet on Milliken 33 additional feet on Banyan 3 additional feet on Rochester 54. Construct full street improvements including, but rot limited to, curb and,gatxer, A.C. pavement, sidewlk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior public streets. Requirment of sidewalk will be governed by the provision of the Planned Coununity text.. 55. A minimum of 26 -foot wide pavMent within a 40 -foot wide dedicated right -of -way shall.be constructed for all half- section streets. 56. Any grading within the road right-of -way prior to, the signing of the i improvement plans shall be accomplished under the direction of a Soil Testing Engineer. Czmpaction tests of embankment construction, trer:.'r backfill, and all subgrades shall be performed at na cost to City of Rancho rucamonga and a 'written report shall be submitted to the City ogineer prior to any placement of base materials argil /or paving. 57. Final plans and profiles shall indicate`' the location.of any existing uti`ity facility which would affect construction. 58. Slope rights shall be ded4cated on the final tzct rap where necessary. 59. All :.reet improveneits shall be installed to the satisfaction of th2 City Engineer, prior to occupancy. 60. Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated on Banyan, Milliken, and Rochester and along the rear of double frontage lots. 61. Existing city street requiring reconstruction shall remain open, for j traffic at all times with adequ3°.z datoars during ior°zruction or street closure permit may be requireo A casVo deposit shall be required to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be ref ided on completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 62. All street names shall be coordinated with the City of Rancho Cucamcrnga Planning Division. 63. Prior to any work being performed in the Fzbli'c right -of -way, fees shall be 'I and an encroachment permit be obtained from the City Engit._.:r's Office, in addition to any other permits required. 64. An encroachment permit shall be required from the State Oepartment of Transportation prior to any construction within their right -of -way. 65. Road improvement Mans as applicable to this project for Highland Avenue shall be submitted to the State Department of ': ransportation by a regist, red civil engineer. 66. In ac -.ordance with the policy of preserving freeway corridors crossing subdivisions, right -of -way x '_,�puate for construction of Statl Highway s shall be .preserved along thfa project's frontage. All futur .tentative tract reaps and final development plan mss shall reflect this. 67. Any change to this project as currently proposed, which may be necessitated by the State Department of Transportation recommendations, must be. incorporated prior to recordation of the Final Map. -7- 0701- 02�_.. 1- 09-85 PC.-.Agenda 4-of 68. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public and /or private street improvements, prior to recording of the nap or the issuance of building permit%O whichever comes first. 63. Existing utility poles shall be shown on the imp•ovement plans and relocated as necessary without cost to the City of Rancho Cucamonga.: 70. In the event developer fails to acquire the required offsite property intrests, the developer shall, prior to approval of the final. map, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Gckvernmet Code Section 66462 at such time as City .acquires the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by developer of all costs incurred by City to acquire the oftsite property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by developer, at developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by City prior to commencement of the appraisal. 71. Right of way and improvements (including off -site) to transition traffic and drainage flows from. proposed to existing, shall be required as necessary. 72. The two points of vehicular ingress and egress to the City or State Maintained Road System shall be provided to each phase. Aft _ 73. Minimum spacing between intersections on local streets shall be not less � than 150 feet, and on major and secondary highways not less than 1/4 mile. 74. Milliken Avenue shall be designed and constructed half- width to major divided highway standards as requested by the City of Rancho Cucamonga - 1/2 of a six -lane divided road. A paving width of 40 feet with A.C. berms sha;1 be permitted oh Milliken Avenue between highland Avenue and Spine Road, 75. The developer shall be required to reserve the right of way necessary for construction of the future foothill freeway. This will include- interchanges and /or proposed 'grade separations. The developer shall coordinate with Caltrans as necessary to establish this Might of way, and shat' show it an the maps. 76. Access to existing homes shall be acknowledged in this design. 77. Coordination with Metropolitan Water District shall be effected by the developer as necessary. ` 78. Access to Flood Control District saleable property north of project shall be incorporated into this design layout. ..8< 79. Subject to City Engineer's approval; temporary access connections to Highland. Avenue shall require Caltrans approval and shall require a cash deposit to cover cost of later removal. This cash deposit shall aso include cost of design and construction of those portions of the tract perimeter roads outside of State right -of -way. 80. Banyan and Rochester shall be designed and constructed half -width to Collector Road Standards 1/2 of a two -lane undivided roast (26 feet minimum width), subject to temporary construction through future freeway right -of -way as approved by City Engineer. 81. Highland Avenue shall be improved as necessary to provide a 44 foot paved surface at the tract access points to provide for left turn lanes. Interim spot improvements shall provide for left and right turns. 82. Fifty foot street - right -of -ways being proposed for this project have been identified and satisfactory substantiation has been provided to the adequacy of these 50 foot streets. 83. Prior to recordation, the developer shalt submit for approval a traffic study indicating the on -site and off -site impacts on Highland Avenue, on Haven Avenue, and on Milliken with appropriate mitigation measures. The developer's fair share cash contribution toward mitigation shall be $35,000. The contribu" ion shall be paid to the City of Rancho Cucamong° on a per lot basis. 84. Lots 333 through 350 shall jot be developed until elimination of the temporary secondary access. 85. Access to Caltrans` property shall be accomplished by using the already existing 20 foot road easeme, 14c, Highland Avenue, provided this is properly recorded, or by making Lot P adjacent to cul -de -sac W, public right of way. 86. The knuckles, cul -de -sacs, and curb radii shown on the map shalt conform to Planned Community text. 87. Fill slope within Caltrans property shall be approved by Caltrans.°'•--_.. 8E. Project parkway shall bs developed to a standard of 2+ lanes tvcries). 89. Project Loop Road shall be developed to a standard or 2+ travel lanes. 90. Two inbound and two outbound lanes shall be provided on the project parkway at the Milliken Avenue intersection. 91. The development plans shall provide for preservation of right -of -way for the Foothill Freeway (future Route 30). Over 23 acres along the southern boundary of the site will be reserved within Phase I and II; this location is consistent with the freeway corridor alig;.ment adopted b;• Caltrans. 92. This project shall be annexed to or shall form a 1972 Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District. All costs associated with the formatiod` of a lighting and Landscaping Assessment District shall be paid by the developer's). -9- ?LANNIN6 93. Prior to the issuance of building permits for any phase of the project, ali plans required for that phase shall be approved and the phase of the tract to kii,h .the permit has been applied for shall be recorded. Approval for this Planned. Communi'y shall be for a period of fifteen (15) years from the date of City Council action. The applicant shall file a development plan for at 'least one phase of the project within five (5) years of this approval and within each succeeding five (5) year period. Extensions iJ time may be granted. Extensions of time must be submitted in writing to the Planning Division at least sixty (60) days prior, to the expiration date. Grading and model home ,permits may be issued prior to recordation, subject to compliance with standard City conditfons, 94. The Planned Community text shah be modified as follows: A. Under Project Tabulations, the overall density shall ,ba. calculated deleting the following: (a) the northeast corner parcel at Milliken and Highlsnd (Not a Part); and (b) property far V;e Foothill Freeway. B. Under Development Regulations and Standards, a statement shall be added which states, "The lot sizes north of the parkway shall vary from 5,500 11,000 square feet, with an average of approximately 7,100 square feet, and the lot sizes south of the parkway shall vary from 4,000 — 10,600 square feet, with an average of approximately 5,000 square feet. - Combined average of approximately 6,250. The percentage of the number of average sized lots shall be ,provided. C. Under Developmen- Regulations and Standards, Section 2(h)(2) shad be changed to read, "building site width shall vary depending on lot size ". D. A statement shall be added under Development regula}fnrs which__ states that lot ratio shall not exceed 3 :1: E. Under Development Regulations and Standards 2(b)(3), 'Building site coverage" shall be changed to "Total impervious Area: 60X: maximum F. A statement shall be added under Development Regulations which states variable front yard setbacks shall be provided with a minimum of 13 feet from property line. 95. The landscaped buffer between residential and commercial uses shall be 15 feet. The buffer shall. be installed on the abutting commercial property at time of its development. 96. Park area totaling 7 acres shall be provided prior to final buildout of second phase. _10_ 97. The applicant shall submit the following information to the City for Alk their review it accordance to the Planned Community Residential Development nevi: ti: pr ^vcc�'.�:'° requirements for Planning Commission -- approval, A. Tentative tract map, B. Conceptual grading map. C. Conceptual building site plan. 0. Conceptual landscape plan showing landscaping and design for all trails, open spaces, walls, street tree planting, slope planting. E. Architectural elevations of all building types, F. V- nation of the followings 1. Open space area 2. Building coverage i i 3. Unit areas 4. Number of wits S. Total site area b. Proposed density G. Plans for all signs. No free standing signs will be permitted except for monument signs, temporary signs, on -site signs, sales, sold and direction signs in accordance with the Sign Ordinance, 98. Prior to recordation of any tract majt, final detailslpians of items A »G shall be included in final plan for staff review. i 99. On a phased basis, all areas identified as open space shall possess no residential development -ights since said developxnent rights have-eseen- transferred to other portiuns of the project. iSiE method of retaining open space shall be agreei �tipin by the developer and City prior to the recordation _f the first tract h;ap for each affected phase. 140. Existing ornamental or Native trees shall be retained when possible. Trees to remain shall be identified on the Grading Plan.' 101. Tht final tract map for the first development phase for each parcel in Ptise T shall record the order of the phasing plan, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 142. All recreational facilities shall have two points of access,' one of which may be emergency only, 103. The conditions outlined in the approved Geologic Report shall become conditions of this project. AANL 104. PersonsYpurcaasing'property subject to noise levels of 65 UN ar greataf —` due to the proposed Foothill Freeway shall be informed of said noise levels. 105.. Al'i financial arrangements shall be made to provide water, sewer, the first final maintenance, etc., prior; to the recordation of developmen'., tract map. 105. rvovide a flat useable yard ooen space excluding graded slopes, building ,aotprints and driveway with a 15 foot minimum distarice' between buildings and break of slope, or to work with the staff to develop specific performance standards for minimum yard areas -for useable private open space. 107. The Planned Community shall contain a maximum of 902 dwelling units. The aforementioned maximum does not include out - parcels or currently owned state right -of -way as shown on Exhibit 3, page 4 of text. 108. Graded slopes will be constructed at slope ratios no steeFer than 2 1 that they be kept to reasonable vertical horizontal to vertical, heights, and that they be planted with suitable landscaping per City standards. A vertical height limit .for graded slopes adjacent to E - residentia' ievelopment shall be shown within the final grading plan and 1111 consistent with Planned Community text. Kim 109. The project site is within the Jurisdiction of the West End Resource revegetation and Conservation District, consequently, water, paving and be to minimize fugitive dust other dust control measures shall used generation. 110. The project will provide a minimum of 3.0 acres of park /1000 population. 111. If the school site is combined with the 'park, the minimum site shall be 13 acres. This requirement may be adjusted to design approval by the Etiwanda School District and the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department. This condition will be necessary if the school is established as a full -sized facility. 112. Preferably the entire park cite shuuld be developed during the first the area within phase; however, if phased development is necessary, park the First Phase should provide for a minimum play field of not less than 3.5 acres. 113. Prior to recordation of any tract maps, a "will serve" letter will be required from affected school - districts. Phase 11 development will no* proceed until adequate capacity exists for students generated by the development, Ank � �12- _ fig. School _: ee5 (as . estab-1 lshed at time of recordation, or otherwise agread to by+,deve oiler districts will be and - co?lertPd for residential development in the project area. This condition shall apply for -t- _., -- y the Chaffey Joint union High School District and Etiwanda Elemen�ary School District, 115. As a 11failsafe provisio,:" an "open" school site shall be reserved in Phase II until site is determined by Etiwanda Elementary School District not to be necessary. 116. Prior to recordation of final maps a "will serve" letter from the CCWD ,°. will be required. (Nate. CCNO has already provieed a "will" serve letter.) ' 117. This project will implement water 'conservation measures including installation of low volume plumbing fixtures end the use of controllers on Oublic area irrigation systems. Off -peak irrigation is encouraged. The use of drought tolerant plant material will be emphasized within common areas. 113. Prior to recordation of any phas;_ determined .necessary by CCWD the project will contribute sewer fees that will allow expansion by RPZ to accept the increase of effluent. 119. Design and construction of all facilities will-be -reviewed ,and,.approved by the CUD. 120. Prior to recordation o: any final maps, there shall be established a landscape and lighting district or the equivalent. 121. The recoamiendations of the approved Geologic. Report shall beconr conditions of this project. 122. Detailed park ;,improvement plans, including grading, landscaping d irrigation, shall be subvii ted f+er" approval by the Comnityo ServVi es Director. 123. 'Shirty (30) copies of the !final adopted Development Plan ;Texts as revised in accordance with Condition 494, shall be printed ar- submitted to the City Planner within sixty (60) days from City Council appror�ar'te A copy of this Ordinance sha:lI be included at the front of the text. -13- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNAG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO, 12642 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12642 hereinafter "Map" submitted by the Caryn Company,.applicant, for she purpose of subdividing the 'real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described gas a residential subdivision of 115 acres of land, located between the extension at Banyan Avenue and Highland Avenue on the north and south, and between the extension of Rochester Avenue, and Milliken Avenue at the east and west into 470 Tots, regularly came before, the Planning, Commission for public hearing and action on January 9, 1985; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the''Map subject to all conditions set -forth in the Engineering and Planning '.- Di'vi-sion's , reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission ':gas read and considered the Engineering and Planning. Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. Noll, TF REFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 12642 and 'the Map thereof; (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative traci. is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; :2 Tentative Tract 12649 January 9, 1985 Page #2 (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through. or use of the property_ within the proposed subdivision. (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a_ Negative Declaration is issued. c SECTION 2: Tent "ative Tr ?,ct Map No. 12642, a copy of which is attached ereeto; is hereby approved subject to all of the attached conditions; APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH.DAY Of JANUARY, 1985. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman I ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy'Secretary Aft I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of January, 1985, by the following vote -to; -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS; Adilk �I i i. Conditions of Approval Tract X12642 BUILDING AND SAFETY 1. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work and submitted to the City Building Official. 2. Grading plans to be submitted to and approved by Building and Safety Division. As required by Lownes geologic reports of Kay 20, 1983 and March 21, 1984, Earth Research report of January 23, 1984 and Douglas E. Moran review comments dated April 11, 1984, additional geotechnical work required prior to approval of grading plans. 3. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards, or as modified on the conceptual grading plan approval and accepted grading praetfces. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading plan. 4. Obtain a demolition permit for huiiding to be demolished. Underground structures must be broken ir, back filled and inspected before covering. 5. Submit plans and,obtain building permits for all walls over 6' in height. 6. The applicant shall comply With the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes, ordinances anti regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. 7. Prior to issuance of building permit for a new residential dwelling------ unit(s) or major additien to an existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay the necessary development fees as per the Annexation Agreement. 8. Street addresses shall be provided by the City Building Official. 9. A geology report, prepared by a licensed engineering geologist,.shall be filed with and approved by the Building Official. The report will be reviewed by a licensed geologist and the costs of such review will be billed to the developer and shall be paid in full prior to recordation of the final map. As required by Lownes geologic reports of May 20, 1983 and March 21, 1984, Earth Research report of January 23, 1984 and Douglas E. Moran review comments dated April 11, 1984, additional geotechnicai work required prior to approval of grading plans. PUBLIC SERVICES 1. Temporary secondary access, as shown on the tentative map, shall be eliminated if Milliken Ave, G Street, Banyan Street to G Street, Spine Street and both Loop streets are paved to al?- weather standards. 2. SE�iage disposal shall be by connection to Cucamonga County Water District sewers - - , 4 3. The Ovate "r purveyor shall be "Cucamonrks County Water District. 4. The following are the steps; 4S','Jmust be completed to meet the requirements for installaty�n and /or finance of the on- ;site /off -site water system and /or k sewer syG�em: f A. Where the system is to be installed prior to recordation. The water system, fire hydrants, and /or sewer system shall be installed in ;accordance with requirements of the State Health and Safety Code, and in accordance with plans appr64ed by the water and /or sewering utility and the governing fire protection authority. The plans shall be reviewed by a Civil Engineer, registered in the State of California, and contain required certificates and approval signature, It is the developer's responsijlity ,ta submit to the Ci Engineer, a -copy of the approved plan and a signed st c;nent from the utility of jurisdiction confirming that the improvement has been installed and accepted. B. Where a bond is to be posted in lieu of installation of the improvement: 1. The domestic water plan and/or sewer plan which meets the requirements of the State Health and Safety Code 'shall- be reviewed by a Civil Engineer, registered in tie State of California, and approved by the water or sewering utility and the governing fire protection authority. The plans shall contain the required certificates and approv;:7- signatures. A copy of the approved plan shall be submitted to the City Engineer. 2. Said engineer shall determine the amount of bond 'necessar'y � install the improvements. a. This amount plus ten percent shall be posted with the City. A statement signed by the engineer stating 'that the amount of bond recommended is adequate to cover the cost of installation of the i-,nprovement shall be included with the estimate and submitted to the City Engineer. b. Or, in cases where the water agency or sewering: agency is a governmental subdivision, the bond in the amount of 110 percent of the cost of installation of the improvement may be placed- with the agency._ A signed statement from that agency stating that financial arrangements have been completed shall be submitted to the City Engineer. °2.. 3. `prior to release of the bond for the improvement, the.tjtility or urisdiction shall submit a signed statement confirming that the improvement has been installed and meets the requirements of all appropriate State and County laws pertaining io such improvement. It is the developer's responsibility that such signed statement is filed with the City Engineer. 5. An acoustical study shall be performed to assess noise levels at the development and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Divi -ion prior to- map recordation. Detailed noise analysis and pr:e;tse mitigation measures shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to recordation. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a report stating that the recommended mitigation measures have been implemented, shall be submitted to the Planning Division and the building plans shall be so esr.ified by the acoustical n_ngineer. Acoustical studies shall be based on available profile and design data of proposed Route 30 at the time of tentative map approval. 6. All existing easements lying within future city street right -of -way are to be quitclaimed or to be delineated on the map per City Engineer's requirements. I 7. Street Improvement plans including street lights prepared -1y a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer Wdil be required for all public streets prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. Final plans and profiles shall show the location of all existing utility facilities within the right -or -way. 8. Pavement striping, marking, traffic and street name signing shall be installed per the requirements of the City Engineer. 9. Emergency access if required shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimum of 26 feet wide at all times during construction in accordance with Foothill Fire District requirements. 10. Prior to _suance of Building Permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Foothill Fire District that temporary water supply for fire protection is available, pending completion of required fire protection systems. 11. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mail boxes. 12. Permits from the: San Bernardino County Dust Abatement District may be required prior to issuance of a grading permit. PLANNING 1. Development /Design Review shall be accomplished prior to Annexation to tha City of Rancho,,Cucamonga. -3- 2. The site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plans on file in the Planning tDivision, the conditions contained herein, Planned Community Text and where applicable, Development Code regulations. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon all conditions of approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. Final site plans and building elevations incorporating all conditions of approval shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Division prior to. issuance of building permits. 4. All final site plans, grading plans, landscape and-irrigation plans, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated fv. consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading permit, tree removal, encroachment, building permits, etc.) prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. S. Approval of this request snail not daive compliance with sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinance_q, and applicable community plans or specific plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance _'I ch have not been addressed either by the Planned Community Text or conditions of tentative approval. 6. All lots on the north side of the parkway shall have a minimum area of 5,500 square feet, with a minimum lot width of 50 feet. All lots on the! south side of the parkway shall have a minimum area of 4,000 square feet, with a minimum to width of 45 feet. Minimum width shall be measured from mid point of lot. Y. The following are minimum building setbacks: A. Minimum rear yard setback of 5 fee , or 12 feet between structures; (Note condition #108 of the Planned Community Text,' B. Minimum side yard setback of 5 feet, or 10 feet between ;structures; C. Variable front yard building setback with a minimum of 18 feet from property line. 0. Minimum street side yard setback of ten (10) feet. 8. A final grading plan shall be required. Said grading plan shall be submitted to the Grading Committee for review and approval. Ali on -site cet and fill slopes shall be a part of the downhill lot when within or between individual lots. 9. Street trees shall be provided per phase as illustrated in the Planned Community text and per approved landscape plans. 10. Greenbelt improvements wholly within the tract shall be provided per phase as illustrated in the Planned Community text. The first phase built adjacent to a greenbelt area shall be responsible for landscaping the entire width of the greenbelt area adjacent to the subject phase (i.e., phase 3 shall be reponsible for construction the entire width of the greenbelt planned for Lot "G" to 5001 south of "Spine Road "). -4- r, E 9 t 11. The applicant shall be respcnsible for constructing 31/2 acres of the 7 acre peek prior to recordation of Phase 6 of Tentat�`!:_� Tract 1264?:-'",A landsc4t a plan shall he approved prior to development of the pur-� Landscaping shown on p"an shall either be improved or bonds posted for their completion. 12. Equestrian trail adjacent to Banyan Avrinue shall be provided per phase and included on landscape plan. 13. Three (3) torus of a Landscaping Plan shall be submitted fcr Planning Division rel,,iew, and approval. Said Landscape Plan shall,.incl,ade the following:; A. The required slope for the surface of all slope banks in excess of five (5) vertical height and of 2;1 or greater, slope landscaped for erosion control as follows: one la- gallon or, larger tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 'one gallon larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope appropriate ground cover. in additi�z% slope in excess of eight (8) feet in vertical height and on greater =cl= shall also include one 5- gallon or larger tre per each 250 sq. 0. of slope area. trees shall be planted in staggered clusters / %to soften slope pane, Maintenance by a landscape Maintenance District may be required by the Planning Commission on a ca,0l•by case basis for perimeter slopes. B. All 4-corative walls shall be. designed and construc';ed to incorporate design features such as tree planter wells, variable setback, split block face. columns, or other such features to provide visual and physical relief along the wall face. C. Any existing eucalyptus trees to be retained shall be topped to thirty (30) feet, trimmed along the lower fifteen (15) feet, and cleared of all 'dead leaves and branches. 14. AT) slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained- 4rr-a- healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that it is in satisfactory condition. 15. Water and energy conservatioaa techniques are encouraged te; oe utilized, such as special irrigation techniques (e.g., drip irrigation), drought tolerant plant species, alluvial' rockscape, etc. 15. Three (3) cop' 'es of an irrigation plan shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval when slope planting is required. 'Slopes - I required to be planted shall be provided with an approyed system of irrigation, designed to cover all portions of the slope,j 'A permanent irrigation system installed by developer is required on all slopes with the exception of those less than 10' whea within 50' distance of a hose bib. A functional test of the system may be required. The mainteneance of gradLd slopes and Landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer until the transfe,, to individual ownership or until the maintenance is _officially assured by a Landscape Maintenance District. Ali irrigation systems, where required, shall be designed on an individual lot basis unless commonly maintained in an approved manner. 17. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to a�aroval by the Planning Division and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineeriry Division. 18. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed on public right -of -way on'the perimeter of this tract area shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City-and annexed into the landscape maintenance district. 3.9. All landscaping and irrigation shown on the approved landscape and irrigation plans and all required walls shall be completed or suitable bonds posted for their completion. 20. Lighting and Landscape District for the project shall be established for the maintenance and management of the common open space, recreational facilities, and public landscaped areas, and trails. 21. All equestrian trails shall reflect the design standards as shown on tentative map. 22. Parking and outside storage areas should be sceeeried from view, to the maximum extent feasible. Screening should be accomplished by utilizing existing topography, by the placement of buildings and structures,�eor- -,lay landscaping and plantings. 23. Approval will be granted by the City Planner for the creation of two, three cr four lots as shown on the approved tentative subdivision for the purpose of obtaining building permits for model homes or units. Prior to issuance of building permits for said model homes, a surety bond or cash deposit shall be posted with the County Transportation Department for the street improvements abutting said lots as required for the approved tentative subdivision. The surety 'bond or cash depu:'it shall be in an amount equal to a contractor's construction estimate plus ten percent. Applicant is permitted four model homes per phase. 24. Provide all utility services to each lot including sanitary sewerage system, water, electric power, gas and telephone in accordance with' utility standards. _6_ AAL ' $ 25,. Installation of any Cable TV service shall be com,dinated by the developer with the cable service provider to coincide with trenching, for utilities. 26. All utilities within the project shall be installed underground including utilities along major arterials 12 KV and less. 27. Utility easements shall be provided to the satisfaction of the serving utility co:noanies and the City Engineer. 28. Developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing public utilities, as required. 29. Developer shall be responsible for the installation of street lighting in accordance with Southern California Edison 'Company and City Standards. 30. App'"ovais have not been secured frnm all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 31. Final parcel and tract maps shall confoi, to City Standards and procedt—as. ! 32. The conditions of the planned conw.inity as contained in Ordinance shall apply where applicable. 33. The recommendations of the approved Geologic Report shall became . conditions of this project. 34. Detailed park improvement plans, including grading, landscaping and irrigation, shall ,b: submitted for approval- by tW, Community Services Director. i 35. Detailed landscaping and irrigation plans shall be �.vbmitted for approval p for to issuance of building permits. 36. Street trees a minima of 15 gallon size or larger, shall be installed J per City Standards and shall be planted at an average of every 30' on interior streets and 20' on exterior streets. i 37. A separate landscape and irrigation plan per City Standard for the parkway and/or median. landscaping to be maintained by the City shall be req�.ire? for review and approval by the City Engineer prier, to issuance of building permits. 38. Maxim slopaa height is twenty (2O) feet. 39. Final grading plans shall be prepared in accordance "ith Ordinance 118 and shah include details of the retention basin. j A RESOLUTION OF THE PL:«NNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF FNICHO CUCAMONGA RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL AMOVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ANO CARYN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, KAUFNAN AND BROAD LAND COMPANY, AND MARLBOROUGH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, IN RELATION TO THE PROPERT" GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN THE EXTENSION AF BANYAN AVENUE AND THE PROPOSCD 'FOOTHILL FREEWAY ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH, AND BETWEEN K ,EXTENSION OF ROCHESTER AVENUE AND MILLIKEN AVENUE ON THE EAST AND VEST. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has init +;,_ted annexation proceedings for the above - described property; and WHEREAS, the Planning- Commission, following a duly held public hearing is recommending approval of the Caryn Planned Community on said . °" property to the City Council; and qW WHEREAS, The Planning Commission, fallowing a duly held public hearing has approved,TT12642 for a portion of the property; and WHERE( `t has been determined that the development of the property • in accordance the Caryn Planned Comgunity /Oeveiopment Plan text within the City limits be beneficial tc the public purposes of the City, in that the property„ •eveloped in t manner authorized by the development approvals would be consistent with the City's General Plan; and WHEREAS, the implementation of said development in accordance with the Planned Community /Development Plan can be best accomplished through the provisions of the attached Development Agreement (which is by reference incorporated herein), NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cuca�inga does hereby resolve to recommend to the City Council approval of the,,, attached Development Agreement upon annexation of the property to the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RES,OLM --ON January 9, 1984 - Page #2 APPROVED AND A0OPW0 T;iI,% 4TH DAY OF JANUARY, I�B5, PLANNING COMMISSION OF tHE CITY OF RANCHO- CUCAMONGk ;. BY: Dennis L...5tout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, di hereby 'certify that the foregoing Resa161ion was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and' - adopt ?d by -:he Planning Co. ission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regu,ir +,4eting of the Planning Conni�sion >ield on the 9th day of January, 1985, , by'the.following vote- to -aiZ: - AYES: COMMISSIONERS; NOES: COMMISSONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:. DEVELOPMEN,' AGREEMENT w [mod THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (the °Agreement' ") is nFide and entered into this day of , 1985, by the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA_,( °City,A) a municipal corporation, THE CARYN LEVELOPMENT CPmPANY (6Caryn.0) a California corporation, KAUFMAN AND BROAD LAND C014PANY ( "R & B10) a California 1 .orporat:Ion, and MARLBOROUGH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ( "MDC, °) a California corporation. Caryn, X B and MDC are sometimes herein referred to collect: ;rerly as "Owner.* RECITALS Caryn, E 6 B, and YWC ;cave ownership interests in the real property described? in 2,o,i, bit A (Ihicl- is attached to this Agreement and a part of if;. (!the property'.) On'Decemter l9, 1984; ;he parties to this Agreement entered into an Annexation Agreement setting forth the coeditionV Lnd?T.4hich -they. would consent to the annexation of the Property to City. i Section 4.1 of the Annexation Agreement provides that as a E condition of annexation, City will confirm the terms of.Arti,le 4 of the Annexation Agreement, and such other provisions of the Annexation Agreement as have yet to be performed, as a developmeut agreement. This is that development agreement. It shall be effective upon the annexation of the Property to City, and it is adopted in compliance with and pursuant to Sections 65864 and following of the Government Code after hearings before and review by the planning Commission and City Council of City. .r- s�0 3.4 Maintenance Assessment District 13 4.0 Terminat %Qn::Date;- Expiration _. 13 5 -0 Review . • ,. . • . . . • . . . . f 13 5.1 Annual Review . . 13 5,2 independent Review . , 14 6.0 Remedies Upon Default , . . . . . . . . . 15 6.1 Owner's Remediesc . r ~. 15 6.2 City's Remedies +, „. ,9,• 15 . 6.3 Actions of Other Agencies . , « is 7.0 Amendment or Cancellation . / 16 [ 3.0 Further Assurances and Additional. Actions by City 1'7 4 9.0 Notices . . 17 iO,O Assignment . . . . . .. . 16 1.1.0 Entife Agreement , . . . . . . 1& 12.0 Oeverabiiity . . . . , . 19 13.O independent Contractors . , . . . 19 EXHIBIT A Property Description EXHIBIT a Planned Community Text %Development' Flan EXHIBIT C Tentative Map. Approval EXHIBIT D Parcel Map Approval EXHIBIT E Caryn's Pack Davalopment 'Plan.. -Y .y DRLfEZ.OPMENT AGREEM6'NT TABLE OFD CONTENTS/ RECITALS . _.. ',. . 1 1.0 City Development Appt?;vals 2 I 1.1 Planned Communitj Zone, Te%t, Subdivision,Map, -and Parcel. Map . . . 2 1.2 Environmental Review 3, 2.0 Owner's Rights and Duties 3 2.1 Right to Develop. . .; 2.2 Rel:;ance on Approvals . 4 I 2.3 Development as Approved . . I 5 2.4 Dedications . . 5 2.5 Improvements . •t'3•.,� 8 2.6 Utility Easements 2.7 P ark Site: . . .. . . 7 2.8 Gzading . . . . . . . . 7 2.9 Fees . . . . 8 a. School Fees . g b. Building Petmit and CoL�truction Fees . . „ 8_ c. Storm DraW Fees . .- . i. 9 d. Recreation and Dark Fees . 9 e. Traffic Mitigation Fee 9 f.. Other Fees . . . . 9 3.0 Assessment Districts and Public Financing Methods . 10 A.1 Mello -Roos and Lighting and Landscaping Districts . 10 3.2 1913 Act Assessment Di strict . aA 3.3 Mortgage Revenue Bonds . . 11 t r l! The City_has determined that the development of the Property in a manner authorized by this Agreement would be consistent with the city ►s General Plan. Thereft.re, in •consid� ratiois of the promises, mutual covenants herein contained, and for other good and sufficient consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1.0 City Development Approvals. 1.1 Planned Community Zone, Tee:, Subdivision t3 and Parcel Map.Pursuant to California Government Code section 65859, City has >)re--oned the residential portion of the Property as P1ann4,Community, which zoning classification is effective upon the annexation, of hi;; Propetli to the City, A Planned Communi ?.y Text /Development Plan has .�cen adopted by the city for Phase I and subsequent phases of development of the Property. -It is attached to this Agre�=ent as Exhibit B and a part of it. Owner has submitted to the City for,i.ts approval, (pursuant to California Government Code ,51ac°tion 66454), Tentative Tract Map No. 12642 and an application for parcel, map approval as contemplated by the Certificate of Compliance issued by the County. The rea.olVtion of the City Council apgroving Tentative Tract ,ap No. 12642 is attached to this Agreement as Exhibit C , and a part of it. The resolution of the Planning Commission approving Parcel Map No. 8617 is attached to this Agreement as Exhibit D and a part of it. As used in this Agreement, the term "City Development Approvals" shall mean and refer to the approvals described -2- above in this Sec ,-i 7 ,l of the zoning, pl =ed Commu -nity ,, 1 Text /Development Man, tentative map approval,'and parcel map approval, and the provisions of this' Agreement. . 1,2 Environmental Review. City agrees to undertake all necessary anO appropriate review and evaluation of the potential environmental impact of the development of the Property in accordance with the City Development Approvals, and shall be the "lead agency' for purposes of the California I, Environmental Quality Act,. The City shall cause the environmental processing and-evaluation necessary for the development of the Property in accordance with the Development Approvals to be obtained on a tin-sly basis and in conformity j with all applicable legal requirements, 2,0 owner's Rights and Duties. 2.1' Right to Develop. Owner shall have the right to subdivide the Property and to construct single family residences as contemplated by, and subject only to the City Development Approvals and compliance with existing laws and ordinances, provided Owner shall comply with the provisions of the uniform building and safety codes of the City then in effect, subject to the provisions of Section 2.9 of this Agreement concerning fees. shall not take any action which is in conflict with the development of the Property in conformity with the City Development Approvals. City further agrees to act wiU, reasonable diligence and in an expeditious manner in reviewing and acting upon submittals, applications, or requests for permits, approvals or other authorizations -3- cozasistent with the City Development Approvals. city gray, AMML pursuant to California Governaent Code Scrtion 6:5866, apply new rules, regulations and policies for the development of the Property which are not in with those rules, zegulations and policies applicable at the time of the 'City Development Approvals and which do not frustrate the purpose of this Agreement, or in any other manner materially end adversely affect the development of the Property consistent_ with tae City 1�. Devc=.1upsent Approvals. 2.2 Reliance on Approvals. owner shall at all times ui,ttil the Osermination Date° (as hereinafter de fined} bAve the right to develop the residential portion of the Property in accordance with the rules, regulations, and ordis7aices applicable to development of real properft.esssting as of the date of the City Developuent Approvals, subject to any matter, prohibition, restriction or approval of such development which is subject to the authority or jurisdiction of a governmental agency ether than the city or a political subdivision of the City. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, City agrees that: the only planning, zoning, design, density, height limitations, use limitations, parking requirements, grading, subdivision, environmental, architectural and development standards and requirements to be applied to the residential portion of the Property by the city shall be those contained in ordinances aid rules and regulations in effect on the date of the City Developnent,Approvals (as the same may have been the subject of any duly enacted variance or other discretionary modificatia:_procedure embodied in the City Development AML Approvals), and that such standards and restrictions -shall continue to govern the development of the residential portion of the Property irrespective of any changes made hereafter to such ordinances, rules or regulations. 2.3 Development asApproved. owner agrees that it will not develop the in a manner materially inconsistent with the City`` °,Pevelopment,Approvals. owner agrees that its development of the,;;Pro,�erty will be subject to the reservations and/'or dedica4 kl:'" � °v�Qed for in the final subdivision tract map�for 1 ,*,ie,?roperty,to the extent required by the City Development Ap)�R�vals. 2.4 Dedications, ko3?.j+ring.the issuance of the City Development. Approvals and the annexation of the Property to the City, the owner shall offer, and the City shall acc-pr for maintenance, (a) the dedication of each,maJor and minor, roadway on the Property (inclua�n-�'Without limitation proposed Danyon Avenue, and the so- called loop_,roads), at-;l all other public improvements, as each is substaatially completed by or on behalf of owner in accordance with the final map and improvement plans and the city's applicable public improvement �I _ standards and regulations in the date hereof, as modified by this Agreement, including the Exhibits which are `k attached to it, aad (b) the •Park Site" (as hereinafter ` defined), all landscaping strips and equestrian trails, as each of same is substantially completed in accordance with the final map plans, the City Development.Approval:a, and the City's l - applicable public improvement Wtandards and regulations in s5_ effect on the date hereof, as modified by this Agreement, attached it,. including the Exhibits which ace to The City _. agrees that at any and all times after acceptance of dedication, and notwithstarndin., the termination or expiration of this Agreement, and subject to such guarantees as are set forth in the City's public improvement regulations as the same exist as of the date hereof, as modified by this Agreement, including the Exhibits which are attached to it, the City hall- be solely responsible for the maintenance, repair and replacement of all portions of the Property so tadicated by owner. Except as hereinabove e,tpressl_y provided, no additional dedication shall be'required to be made by the owner provided the owneb develops the Property substantially in accordance with the City Development Approvals. 2.5 improvements. owner shall be responsible for the installation of all on -site and off -site improvements required under the ordinances, rules and regulations existing as of the date of the City Development Approvals, including but not limited to, the prevision of on -site streets, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drainage facilities and sewer and water service. The drainage pattern and design criteria for all drainage improvements, the width, grader curvature and design of all streets, curbs and sidewalks, and the conceptual and improvement plans for all other off-site improvements, required to be constructed or installed by the City Development Approvals shall (if in compliance with all applicable ordinances, rules and regulations) be approved by City within a reasonable time after submit)�,al to City by owner, and upon receiving such entitlement, Owner may proceed to make such -- improvements in accordance therewith. 2.5 Utility Easements. The City shall approve all necessary appropriate public easerients for water and utilities as necessary to service the Property as improved by the Owner pursuant to this Agreement; provided, however, it is understood and agreed that all easements that are required to be acquired shall be paid for by owner. 2.7 Park Site. The public park (herein referred to as the "Park Site ") identified in the Development Plan shall be named "Caryn's Park ". Caryn's Park shall be developed in substantial conformity with the design shown in Exhibit E attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Caryn's Park shall be developed in phases as described in said Exhibit E. City's Director of community' services agrees to review all plans, drawings and specifications for said park in a prompt manner. 2.8 Grading. City further agrees that Owner will have the right to commence grading upon securing a grading permit, and that permits will not be denied based on season or date provided that Owner agrees to comply with all City required precautions and to use due care in grading activities and to take reasonable st-ps to prevent erosion, slippage or dangerous run off conditions. Owner acknowledges that City, pursuant to existing grading regulations, is empowered to suspend or modify grading when hazardous conditions are determined to exist, provided that City will not exercise such power if Owner takes reasonable steeps prescribed by the City to _7.. owner shall not be obligLted to pa!r''such ..g� mitigate any potential damage, to assure that adjacent property owners will not be : *-ged, and to repair any actual damage to ; the Propet,ty and ail cent property within a reasonable time. ,1 2.9 Fees, City and Owner agree that the City's fee- and exactions for development of the 'Property shall be modified as follows if due and paid ,-efore the Termination Date of this Agreement. a. school Fees. Fees for schools and schooling shall be paid solely in accordance with City ordinance No. 69 -c as the same exists as of the date hereof. b. Building Pern. t and Constyxdtion Fees. Plan chuck and building and consti:; Lion permit f:es shall be paid in accordance with the City's fee schedules ad ;t exists at the time owner submits appropriate applications for building o..'- construction permits provided, however, that if the building and construction permit fee schedule, as it exists as of the date of this agreement, is - -- amended to impose a fee, exaction or imposition to reimburse the city for its costs, or otherwise defray thy? cost to the 1 City, of providing a service which is not presently provided by the City, nor within i the scope of services or purposes ;}t r, contemplated by the Uniform Buildinq Code,'" owner shall not be obligLted to pa!r''such ..g� -- additional fee, charge, exaction or imposition. C. Storm Drain Fees. Inasmuch as the stnrm drains required by the City Development Approvals exceed the stadards of the City, no storm drain fees of any kind will be required of Owner if Property is developed to the requirements of the City Development Approvals. d. Recreation and Park Fees. inasmuch as the "park site" as hereinafter defined) and other open space to be developed and dedicated or donated by Owner to the City, meets the standards and requirements of the City, no park or recreation fees will bP required of owner if the Property is developed to the City Development Approvals. e. Traffic Mitigation Fee. The Traffic Mitigation Fee described in oonditien of Approval No. 84 of Exhibit B to the Annexation Agreement shall be reduced to Thirty -five thousand dollars, ($35,000.00.) f. Other Fees. owner shall not be required to pay the City';; Beautification -Fees or Systems Development Fees. No other fees or other charges shall be imposed upon owner in connection wit ttf r development of the property in accordance with the�City Davelopment Approvals for any of the purposes or -9 of improvement bonds pursuant to the ! mprovement Bond Act of �Zp_ services mentioned in this-Section 2.9 prior to the Termination _ Date of this Agrees nent. 3.0 ASsessment Districts and Public Financing Methods. 3.1 Mello -Roos and Lighting and Landsca in Districts. W y and Owner hereby agree to use their best efforts to cause tt #e annexation of the Property to (a) the Day Creek Mello -Roos District established and existing within the City for the installation, maintenance and provla::rn of flood control and drainage facilities, which, when constructed, will benefit the Property, and (b) the Lighting and Landscaping District established and existing within the City so as to provide the Property with all servicos presently pruviled to other properties within the City by such district. The City shall consider annexation to such other special benefit assessment: districts as may be requested from time to time uy owner. The annexation of the property to each of such districts shall be accomplisbed at the earliest possible time and shall be on terms and conditions generally applicable to other properties presently within such districts, provided, f however, that no assessment shall be made under the 1972 Landscaping and Lighting Act until 60% occupancy of each tract. i 3.2 1913 Act Assessment District -. If requested by Owner, City agrees to initiate and use its best efforts to pursue to completion proceedings pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code, €or the formation of one or more assessment districts, and proceedings for the authorization and issuance j i of improvement bonds pursuant to the ! mprovement Bond Act of �Zp_ 1915, Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code, to finance -- suAghk ch :improvement costs as identified by Owner to the City in the request by Owner and authorized to be financed pursuant to such Acts„ Owner shall advance all cosi:s, including those of the preparation of engineering plans and saecifications, economic or financial studies and feasibility reports, and such other costs as are necessary or appropriate for the supervision and administration of the issuance and sale of assessment district bonds. The costs so advanced shall be reimbursed to Owner from the proceeds of the bonds issuel. One or more series of improvements district 'bonds may be issued to finance such :.,iprovement costs. However, no bond shall be issued in an amount greater than (a) the cost of constructing those m-Drovements identified by owner to City plus (b) amounts` included in the bond issue to cover the cost of financing fees, discount fees, reserve fund (not to exceed maximum debt service on such bonds for one year), consulting fees attendant'to the foumation of the assessment_ district, bond insurance premiums, bond attorneys' fees, reimbursements to Owner, and other costs,,,__ normally and reasonably associated with the issuance of such bonds. 3.3 Mortgage Revenue Bonds. If the City initiates a program to issue mortgage revenue, industrial revenue or similar type bond'a or notes, the proceedi of which may legally be used to finance, in whole of in part, the purchase, by home buyers of any portion of the development of the Property by Owner,, or the construction of such development by Owner, the Owner shall be allowed c;o participate in svch .a program.,Hnch_ participatio_, snail be based on the rules and procedures of the- - City applied on a uniform basis to all other developers within NW the City, and for purposes of the allocation to te_, - „auz for the city's 19,8US mortgage revenue bond program, City shall not reduce any allocation that otherwise would heave been mg3e to Owner on the basis that the Propetty is not yet annexed to the City on the date of the allocation. If Owner, or any of them, elects to participate in the City's 1985 mortgage revenue bond program, the following provisions shall apply; a) The city' shall not require the payment of commitment fees, (other than the 1 /2% deposit fee) before March 5, 1985, b) On March 5, 1985, Owner, or any uf'them, may do any of the following: 1) Elect not to participate in the mortgage revenue bond program. 2) Pay-the commitment fees. 3) use its allocation, it any, in a separate 'issue which the City agrees to issue. If any Ownee elects this option, Owner shall pi4y the applicable commitment fees for such separate issue, at such time as required by underwriter's counsel in order to maintain the allocation, and simultaneously pa_v any increased costs of the bond issue incurred by the City, or its redevelopment agency, toS,ether with all iricreaseA other participants in the - ._ P p 1985 bond program: as'4 result of Siuch' "division or ..12_ �t ti divisions of the issue. The amount, if any, of such increased casts, shall be determined by the City upon the report of the underwrter. 3.4 Maain%enance Assessment District. Those portions of the Property to be dedicated by Owner to the City as provided in Paragraph 3.3 Ileteaf`Shall be maintained by the i City cr by a Landscaping and Lighting Act of.1972 assessment district now existing or hereafter formed. The Owner agrees to coupe,rate in and consent to the for:natian of the assessment district, (or annexation to an existing district) , for the maintenance of all such property, and irclud'ing, all of Lhe Property within the district. G 4.0 Terrniration'Sate; Expiry action. ,l The term *Termination DatP* shall mega the 4 earlier of (a) the fifth (5th) anniversary•of the date that the firs::. final subdivision tract map for Pnase I shall have been i recorded in the Of-ficial Records Of San Bernardino County, or (b) December 31, 1990. Provided, however, that this Agreement shall terminate with respect to each parcel of the Property upon the issuance of a certificate of Occupancy or release £or "-: Occupancy for such parcel. 5aO Review. 5.1 Annual Review. City shall review this Agreement at least once every twelve month period from the date this Agreement is executed at which time Owner shall be required to demonstrate good fifth compliance with the terms of this Agreement. Evidence of good faito compliance shall include, but is not necessarily limited to, the preparation of -13- improvement plans following the issuance of the City Development Approvals, the commencement of construction upon any portion of the Property, or the periodic public advertisement for sale of single family resid?,atial- units' within the property�'•Cwner shall be in default under this Agreement if it provides City wit4 a written notice stating that it does not intend to perform further under it or if.City makes a finding and determination following the prescribed periodic review as set forth above-,and as provided in California Government Code Sections 55865.1 that, upon the basis of substantial evidence, Owner has not complied in good faith with the terms of this Agreement. 5.2 Independent Review. It is heret?y acknowledged f and agreed that each of the parties which comprise owner will Aft own, and as to R &B an-, MDC, will develop different portions of the property. The finding and determination by City pursuant to Paragraph 5.1 above that one of the parties comprising a- -aner has not complied in good faith with the terms of this Agreement shall not bind the other parties comprising the owner and shall not affect the rights of the other parties under this Agreereh "" or the obligations of the City to such other parties unless and . until City shall have independently found and aetermined that each of such other parties has not complied "in good faith with the terms of this Agreement. This exclusion shall not apply when ~here is a default by one cr more affiliated owners or developers of the Property, in which case each affiliated owner raay be found in default on the basis of such affiliation.. "Affiliated' entities are those in which there is commons -14- ownership of -30% or more of the entities; or one or more owns 30% or more of another. 6.0 Remedies Upon Defauit. 6.1 Owner's Remedies. Except as provided in Paragraph 6.3 hereof, this Agreement shall be enforceable by Owner nc,twithstanding any change „in any'appli.cable general or specific ptan, zoning, subdivisign or buildinq regulation• adopted by City which alters or 4mends the rules, regulations, or policies specified in California Government Code °_Sections 65866. To the extent permitted by law, therefore, it is expressly recognized that specific performance of this Agreement fo-"he benefit of Owner, and for each of Lhe parties comprising Owner, is a; prmpeL and desirable remedy in addition ;- to any andall other remedies which may be available to Owner. Provided it is further agreed that owner shall h. =oe'no right. to damages in the event or breach of this Agreement by City, 6.2 City's Remedies, City shall have no right to any damages or other relief in the event of a breach of this Agreement by Owner except that City may suspend its obligation and terminate this Agreement as to the party which comprises the Owner if such party ii in default, as defined its Paragraph ` 6.1. Provided, this shall not limit City's remedies under any other agreement with Owner or which would otherwise be available to i-c in the absence of this Agreement. 6.3 Actions of Other Agencies. If, as a result of the laws, regulations, or actions of federal, state or other agencies having supremacy over city, compliance with this Agreement by the City is prevented or precluded, the provisions -1S- of this Agreement may be modified or suspended so as to comply^ with such laws, regulations or actions. If, however, such modification or suspension substantially deprives either of the parties of the bargained for benefits of this Agreement, such parties shall fie entitled to terminate >his Agreement, provided, how €"ver, prior to any such termination, City shall yyy negotiate in good faith with Owner to reach a reasonable alternative development that May be undertaken by the Owner in lieu of the development or otherwise to provide owner with the benefit of such covenant by City ,which ;1;s prevented or precluded by any laws, regulations, or actions of any federal, state or other agency having supremacy over city.` i 7.0 Amendment or Cancel latirri. 7.1 This Agreement may be amended or cancelled in whole or in part only by mutual consent of.the parties pursuant to the provisions of California Government code Section 65868 and the rules and regulations adopted by City. (a) Any amendment to this Agreement which 'does not relate to the Termination Date, permitted uses, ,density or- =d_ --- 1 I intensity of use, height or size of buildings, provisions for reservation of land, conditions, terms, restrictions and requirements relating to subsequent discretionacy actions, or any conditions or covenants relating to the use of the Property shall, not require a public hearing before the parties may execute an amendment hereto, (b) Any nonsubstantial deviations from the City - Development Approvals, or from this -Agreement as determined by City's City Manager, or Director of community -16w Development,,' shall not (to the extent not othE -wise legally required) require any amendment to this Agreement nor any public hearing before approval, thereof by the City Manager ne,Director of`COmmunity Development,, E 8.0 Further Assu Addition Ar Fions btu Citv:' 8.1 City sham;, to the extent legally g y permatt2d, -,t ake r all t'A ^r.;3 necessary o effects; ate and implement the terms and provisions of this Agreement. 9.0 t�oti,,,ces. 9.1 Any notice to be,,,given or other documents to be delivered by one party to the o'iher shall he delivered in person or by postage prepaid, certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, addressed as folliows To City: Yr, Jack Lam Director of COm2ninity Development City of Ranchc;-�Cucanonga 9320 BaaelinPC 4� enue Rancho Cueamori`ga, California To Droner: If to K58: Kaufman and Broad Land Company 21601 Wilshire Boulevard 11th Floor Los Angeles, California 90025 Attention: Mr, Clyde LaAe With copies to: Kaufman and Broad Lega,1, Department'- 11601 Wilshire Boule,iard llth Floor Los Angeles, California 90025 It to MOC: Marlborough ,Development Corporation 2029 CenUlry `park East suite 1550 Los Angeles,;'California 90067 Attention; Michael Romeo xf to Caryn. The Caryn Development Company 10340 Foothill Boulevard Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attention: 17 with copies to: Thomas Clark, Jr., ES4. AQ Stradling, Yocca, Carlson &_Rauth w 660 Newport Center Drive Suite 1600 Newport Beach, California 92660 - 640-,. Any mailed notice given as aforesaid shall.be deemed effective 48 hours after deposit into the United States mail as aforesaid. Either party hereto may frcm time to time, by written notice to any of the other parties, designate a different name or address wh;; ^h shall be substituted for that given above. The change of name or address shall be effective upon receipt of personally deliverer: pr five (5) days after the date of deposit of the notice into the United States mail if by mail. 10.0 Assignment. 10.1 owner, and each of them, shall have the right to assign or transfer ineir respective rights, title and interest under this Agreement, in whole or in part, to any person, firm,_ corporation or entity without the prior written consent of City. In the event of any such assignment, khe assigning owner shall provide City with written notice of such aasignment at least thirty (30) days pr,,-)r to such assignment or transfer. The obligations of this Agreement shall be binding upon, and the benefits hereof shall inure too the successors -in- interest and assigns of the owners. 11.0 Entire Agreement. 11.1 This Agreement, including the Exhibits hereto, contained the entire agreement between the parties and any agreements or representations concerning this, ?'tgteement, the Property, or the development of the Property by the Owners -I8- pursuant hereto, not set:!Orth herein shall be of no force Or —' effect. 12.0 Severability. 12.1 Subject to Paragraph 6.3 hereof, if any.,term, Condit an, provision, or covenant of this Agreement, {r the application thereof to any person or circumstance, sb�t11 be finally held invalid or unenforceable by a court of co -tent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Agreement and its applix-ation shall not be affected and shall remain valid and enforceabie to the fullest extent permitted by _law. 13.0 independent Contractors, - 13.1 In carrying out the provisions of this Agreement, Owner and City shall act as independent contractors and nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed or construed by the parties hereto or by any bird person to E create the relationship of principal and agency, joint {ppp venturers or partnership. i IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Annexation Agreement is made ai entered into as of the date and year first above written. �•_ E I THE CARYK D2VELOiMENT COMPANY, a California Corporation By: Its By its STATE OF CALIFORNIA ? G COUNTY OF on this day of , 1985, before me, the c - - undersigned,:a Notary Public in and for said state, personally - -- appeared personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person who executed the within instrument as the , and personally noun to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person w o executed the within instrument as the � of the Corporation that executed the within instrument>an" acj�tnowledged to me that such Corporation executed the within instsilment pursuant to its By -Laws or a Resolution of its Board of Directors. Witness my hand and official seal. Notary's a gnatu ;ie - - v Type or Print Notary's Name KAUFMAN AND BROAD LAND COMPA", a California corporation. By; Its By: Its STATE OF CALIFORNIA t COUNTY OF j On this day of , 1983, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said sta }e, personally appeared personal!S� known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory`_rvideace) to be ,..._..__ the person who executed the within instrument as the , and personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the persona who executed the'Within instrument as the of the Corporat_a+r_ that executed the with n instrument and acknowledges to me that such Corporation executed the within instrument pursuant to its By -Laws or a Resolution of its Board of Directors. Witness my hand and official seal. Notary's Signature Type or Print Notary's Name MARLBOROVdH DEVELOPMENT CORPORA,°1ION, a California -20- 0 n k corporation Its By: its STATE OF CALIFORNIA j COUNTY OF } On this day of , I985, b.foLe me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and fo said state, personally appeared personally -known tome (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be tY.e person who executed the within instrument as the , and personally known to roe (or proved to me on the basis o satisfactory evidnce) to be the person who executed the within instrument as the I 1= of the Corporation that executes. the wit in instrument an acknowledged to me that such Corporatioz.executed the within instrument pursuant to its By -Laws or a Resolution of its Board of Directors. Witness my hand and official seal. Notary's Signatv_e Type or Print Notary's Dame: ATTEST: By: City CIerk of the City Of Rancho Cucamonga CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation By: Mayor -21- E DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: TlRSr AL1 12 A ATf4TSA. MUN A AiTAATf'� A REPORT STAFF Jar,vz ry 9, 1985 Chairman and M €tubers of the Planning Commission Rick Gomez, City Planner Curt Johnston, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW-NUMBER 84- FWE COMPANY - The development of a 81,401 square foot office building on 4.5 acres of land, located an the east side of Center Avenue, between Enterprise Street and Commerce Center Drive - APN: 210- 391 -9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A. Action Requested: Approval of a ,precise site plan and architectural design, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Purpo:;e: Construction of ",:n 81,410 square foot two -story office building. C. Location: East side of Center Avenue, between Enterprise Street and Commerce Center Drive (northwest of the intersection of Haven Avenue and 4th Street). D. Parcel Size: 4.5 acres. E. Existing Zoning: ISP, Industrial Park Category (Subarea 6)..._._. E. Existing Land Use: Vacant G. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Multi- tenant Industrial buildings and vacaxt parcels, designated Industrial Park (Subarea 6). South Vacant parcels, Haven Avenue Overlay District pending, designated Industrial Park (Subarea 6). East - Vacant parcels, Haven Avenue Overlay District pending, designated Industrial Park (Subarea 6). West - Vacant parcels, designated Industrial Park (Subarea 6). H. General Plat* Designations- Project —' Site - Industrial Park North - Industrial Park South - Industrial Park East - Industrial Park Kest - Industrial Park ITej K PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT -Development Review 84 -50 - FWE Company January 9, 3985, Page 2 I. Site Characteristics :The property is currently vacant and street ,;improvements have been installed on all surrounding streets. The site slopes to the south. at approximately 2% and no significant vegetation exists on the property. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: This project is located adjacent to the Haven Avenue Dveriay District "Urban Center" at 4th Street. Seven lots will:- 'be consolidated to develop ,this project as indicated on the location map. A two- story-Wfice structure is proposed with exterior materials consist`Yng of painted concrete and reflective glass. The main..entry points into the building are from the south, and two patio areas with overhead trellis work are also provided along the north elevation:, The area the site devoted to landscaping is approximately 25%, and the required 25 feet of streetscape landscap �,g has been averaged along all three street frontages. B. Design Review Committee: The Design 'Review Committee reviewed all aspects of the project including building size and location, pedestrian orientation, landscape setbacks, and architecture as it relates to the Haven Avenue Overlay District. After a review of #he. project, the Committee recommended approval with a condition of that a 2 -foot to 3- foot high retaining wall be provided at-'the south side of the parking lot to facilitate increased berming along Commerce. Center Drive and screening of the parking lot. In addition, the Committee skated that the building size must be adjusted to meet the City parking requirements and that parking in front of the south entrances must be reduced to increase pedestrian orientation. The applicant has revised the plans accordin Iy _ and a condition of approval has been added to require the retaining wall. C. Technical Review Committee:. The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project and enained that with the recommended conditions of approval, the project as revised is consistent with all applicable City Standards and Ordinances. D. Gradina 'Committee: The Grading Committee reviewed and approved the conceptual grading plan subject to standard conditions necessary to meet City requirements, including submittal of a final grading plan prior to issuance of buildl ig permits. Al— 2 El e PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Development Review-84-50 NE Company January 9, 2986 . Page 3 E. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant. Staff has completed the environmental checklist and found no significant 8verse impacts as a result of this project. If the Commission concurs with these findings, 'issuance of a `;agative Declaration would be appropriate. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with.. -he Industri&i Area :specific Plan and General Plan. The Froposgl )se, building design and site pl,�in, together with the. xecommend6ti Conditions of Approval are in compliance with all applicabl,e'City Standards. In addition, the project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties, or cause significant adverse pnvirgnmental impacts. Iii. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommendr�' that the Plan4--,.'ng Commission approve this pr-iject with cc` ,Mons t4reugh adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance `of a Negative DeclaratYon. Respj`tf Ily subItted, Rick me= City 1 r I�G:CJ :cv At`,. aqt: Exhibit "A""- `ucation Map F Exhibit "8° - Site Util itatibei Mao Exhibit "C" Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "D" - :Conceptual Landscape Plan___,__ Exhibit "E" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "F0 Exterior Elevations Initial Study, Part iI Resolution of Approval with Conditions i 4 FIG. MZ SUEMA00 M CIRCULATION t;wFLOA ARROW.`Oso_ o ..- .. r•o IOw B.O.W. - .r� HAY or lour B•9.W. - e1 RAIL SERVICE *= a -w ExiaUno 1'sw '' • -e:wa. •. .•w.r. Proposed a;. ;a� • 6000 pedeatrlao + =,.. J • . t' sh • s 4 Bkyde J. a ra am Regions VVYV aautiFdlaa r ,:Qdal 51eetaeapo" •— ;: • LaOSacePi�Q Power Lkw/ UUIIty.Easenmt. ... Crooks Channels, wr.. • S 9rldEt. - L �C r, t •�: - Ac ct~zw Points o • r* a +• . • a,. • ath ED .. .� Park j - r 3 Fire Stetlon �O 406' 860 lEOt!- .. 7+•r Aart ,tea NQ l7lT, $hilZJTl Tfi "wne er....t,oy m•39 NORTH rinse. n.. k ti r •tee �, •tee � •� IM j e- RANCHO CUCAMONGA •nTLE: PUCVNNG DIVISIaN ,EXHIBIT: ' " All- '7 . 7h�eaMilk � j iaxr�w+mx smozT a s Y f r_„ 1 "! kk „ i5 �. T r vviNr• n• • jir•JiMQAO J YAC.Wt Hr .T3R +GM�4• N 04fr11!' �. fo% t SITE UTILIZATION PLAN ATORTH CITY CAF ITa I � 5e, RANCHO CUC MONGA TITLE: 5 4rnr_ 6EM2�( ✓uA� PLANNIPsZ, IDIA)BION EXHIBIT= _SCALE /�+ * *a . _ s VICINITY MAP PROJECTOATA PMIUxG W1011"PING uu ins a n. PROPOSED SITE PLAN 1� T(}Iti'H 1 i CITY OF TTEM: _ �� ��i 1 ANC CLTt d,,kNiaNGA TITLe. 1 T�YJt 7 T_ l I PLAN ",JG DIVISION EXHIBIT- `"'= � S�`�C LrE� w.. o76�r..r." r' VITY OF RANCHO �! CUCAMONGA -+ PART II - INITIAL STUDY ENVIROj;iM !TAL CHECKLIST i, DATE:_ tv7!lFsUf<'�.Fl O%8� APPLICANT:_iow-<u25 Cp l,flG. FILING GATE: /VcXi �LOG NUMBER: Deb' PROJECT: Ab , ,! PROJECT LOCATION: }C.�'ii17; "'l. Gs2Zlc3t -cam Gaq,7 G'rt1T62,A I. ENVIRONME::TAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets) YES W.7BE NO 1. Soils and.Geolog . Will the proposal have ANk significant results in: a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or burial of the soil ?, y - C. Change in topography or ground surface contour intervals? -- d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any potential inc -ease in wind or water erosion of soils, affecting either on or off site conditons? f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, "or similar hazards? h. An increase in the rate of extraction and /or use of any mineral resource? r 2. Hydrology. Will the propdyal have significant �� results in: Page 2 'YES MAYBE NO a. Changes in' ,curreuts, or the course of direction - of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream channels? « ,✓' ' b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? 1r d. Change in the amount tpf, surface water in any j body of water? e. Discharge into surface waters, or any alteration of surface water quality? f f. Alteration of grouadwater characteristics? b/ g. Change in the quantity of grourdwater,s, either through direct additions or wii;i- drawals, or through interference wtth-ain aquifer? Quality? Quantity? h. The reduction in the amount'cf water other- wise availaUe for public water supplies? I. Exposure of people or property" to water related hazards such as flooding oT seiches ?. 3. Air Quality. Will the-proposal rave significant results in: a. Constant or periodic air emisz ions from mobile or indirect sources? V 5t7l•onary sources? b. Dete.,oration of ambient air quality and /or { intert`trence with the attainment of applicable air q,.`tlity standards? , c. Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movements moiature or temperature? 4. Biota Flora. Will xhe proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the charfscteristics of species, Including diversity, distribution, or number of any species of plants? Y+/ b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare i or endangered species of plants ?,. I't ii ,► Page 3 _ YES MAYBE NO c. Introduction of ne:.i or disruptive species of plants into an area? r d. Reduction,3n the potential' for agricultural 'production? — Fauna. Will the proposal , have sig 'Icant results In: T1 a. Change in the characteristics of'-,)ecies, including diversity, distribution,'or numbers of any species of animals? Zt b. Reduction-of the numbers !of and unique, rare or endangered species of animals? y` C. Introduction of'new or disruptive species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration or removal of existing.fish or wildlife habitat? 5. Population. Will the proposal . have significant results in: a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of the human population of an area? b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? */ \ r 6. 6ocio- Economic Factors. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change 3n local or regional- socio- economic characteristics, including economic or commercial diversity, tax rate, and property values? b. Will project costs be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax payers or project users? 7. Land Use and Pianning;Uvnsiderations. Will the Proposal have significant results in? a. A substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an areal b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, policies, or adopted plans of any governmental ., entities? _ c. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of ex?.stiug consumptive or non- consumptive recreational opportunities? E�. AC /Z r f i Page 4 8. �. YES MAYBE �!;O_ ` ransoortation. Will the ro osal have si nYlzcant proposal g results in: a. Generation of substantial add'tiona; vehicular movement? v/ b. Effects on existing,streets, or demand for new street i construction? — c. Effeci:-,,_on existing parking fzcilities, or demand _)jar new parking? d. Substantial- impac4 upon existing transporta- tion systems? ✓ e. Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of people and /or goods? f. Alterattons to or effects cn present and Potential water- borne, rain, mass transit or air traffic? 0 g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedescrians? j 4. Cult+tral Resources. 'fill the proposal have _ significant results in: a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, paleintologscal, and /or histori t'- resources ?, - 10. Health. -Safety, and Nuisance Factors. Hall the proposal have significant results in: a. Crea ion of any health hazard oY potential health:. hazard? _ d b. Exposure o£ people to potential health hazards? c. A risk, of explosion or relsasa of hazardous substances in the event of an accident? d. An increase in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? e. Increase in existing noise levels? f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous noise lovely? _._. a. The, lation of objectionable odors? h. _nc; An increase in light or glare? Page, 5 ..`ES MAYBE NO 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic vista or view? b. Ths creation of art aesthetically offensive sites? c. A conflict with the objective of designated or potential scenic corridors? 12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal have a significant need for new rystems, or alterations to the following: a. Electric power ?, V/ b. Natural or packaged gas? AZ c. Communications systems? d. Water supply? e. Wastewater facilities? f. Flood control structures? g. Solid waste facilities? h. Fire protection? i. Police proteetir,.? J. Schools? t/ k. Parks or other recre._ti:;nal facilities? 1. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads and flood control facilities? m. Other governmental services? f 13. Energy and Scarce Resources. Will the -2roposal _ have significant results in: a. Use of subsLivzial or excessive fuel or energy? / b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of, nergy? u c. An increas . in the demand for development of new sources of energy? d. An increase or perpetuetion of the consumption ` of non - renewable forms of energy, when feasible / renewable sources of energy are available? (f Page 6 YES 1SLAYHr, N0_, e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or scarca natural resource? 24. Ma &itory Findin s of Si ificance. a. Does th., project have the potential to degrade j the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species,_ cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten LCD elizinate 9'plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate importaat examples of, the major periods of California history or prehistory? V b. Does the project have the potential to achieve I short -term, to the disadvantage of long -term, environmental goals? (A short -terra impart on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time While long- term impacts will;eadure welt into the future). c. Does the project have i+rpacts which, are Individually limited, b�tr ~_ uiatively nonsiderable? (Cumulative'ly co ,'tderable means that the incremental'affects of an individual project are cons�derablL when viewed to connection with the effects of past projects, aneprobable future projects), `/ d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse ef_r -,ts on human beings, .either directly or Inds ;rt2y? II. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRUN`fENTAL EVALUATION (i.e., of affirmative �► answers to " the above questions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures)„ ij f.� i1 Page 7 III. DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: 2project, �on T fInd the proposed COULD NOT have a significan�� effect the environment, and a: NEGAi7VE DECLARATION. will be � epared. I find that although the proposed prbjeet could have a significant effect on the environment, there aiii not-,-a a significant effect in this case „,because the nAitigation measures described on an attached sheet have keen added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPAA-_O. T find -the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the envirnment„ and an.,9NVIRONMZ, IMPACT. UPORT is required. r V Pate 5 cure Title J t n .e RESOLUTION N0. OF r" RAN" CUCAMON�A PLANNING- COMMISSION RESOLUTION APPROVING OEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 84,50 LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF CENTER, BETWEEi ENTERPRISE STREET AND COMMERCE CENTER. ORIVE IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK CATEGOR`! (SUBAREA 6) DISTRICT 'WHEREAS, on the 2nd day of November, 1984, aV complete applicrtion was file.•'by F::F Company, Inc.. for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, ort the 9th day of January, 1985, the kancho Cucamonga Planning Commission h6& a meeting ,to consider the above described project,. NOW, THEREFONE, the Rancho Cucamonga Ptanny:!g Commission resolved ac fell- SECTION 1: That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed use :is in accord with the , objective of the Deg ,-lopment Code, the Industrial Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance wiih etch of the applic?''fk- provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan and Development Code; and 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the publ'zi health, sa�ety, or welfare, or materially tee•- injurious to properties or improvements in the ! vicinity. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the r environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on January 9, 1985. j SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 84 -50 is approved subject to � the folloiaing conditions and attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION: 1. A 2 -foot to 3 -foot high retaining waT1 shall be provided ac the south side of the 'parking lot , t(,. facilitate increased landscaped berming along Commerce Center Drive to screen the parking lot., Details shall be provided -13n the landscape plans submitted for review and agproval'uy the City Plantner: prior to issuance of building permits. Resolution No. DR 34 -50 - FWE Company January 9, -1985 2. The final Grading Plain shall be revised to show all surface drainage eWirg„ the site through- under sidewalk /curb drains Per, City Standards, - ENGINEERING DIVISION: 1. A lot line merger to com4ine the 7 existing parcels within the site into I parcel shall be cgmpleted,.Wor to t-e issuance of building permits. 2. Notice of intention to,;3oin the proposed median °island landscape maintenance district shall,;be filed with the City Council prior to occupancy. 3. Any a isting'dr°ivaw�ys which are not tv be used shah be removed and replr,�ced with standard curb and 9dtter, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9th DA7'OF JANUARY, 1985. PLANNING COMMTSSION OF THE CITY PI -LANOO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. ;Stout, halrm?ii: �- ATTEST:— Rick Gomez, Deputy Secreuary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secrerary of the Planning Commission of the City ,ofi _ Rancho C',camonga, do hereby certify that the forepaing Reso'Tution was duly and regular'iy introduced, passed, and addpted by the Planning Commission of the -' City re R,ncho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Coa„a scion held on t;e 9th day of January, 19W, by the Poliowin WE!'- CoWISSIONERS: NOES,, COMMISSIONERS: ABSELT: COMMISSIONERS: f i i 'i �r U - p.Ldn DO ^Uy °• Hn ar 6 .q °EuiC¢' 9 6` •T F `�., O° L90'S Wur -q0' NW Yom. nuyygY V . lV YCO� L tl 4 qsC! ^dL OT yu to EU� L C •� ®Cg6yi y0y b =m CU uG NC, 6 SOY•+ U rr6Q% RCa• 66 O b Ol °•C: e•q 0' LY °Q T{� u CV da� L L °_ J'G.� �� °i, d `+• •'U ad dOU� ng'. "�.•c« L OVY y� L G vw V V� 1�aec� a+NF, .•. -.y �sa b6N ^� n '� a• na. RQr ... rd v� a ?v4. a c�9. b^ bq N �'4`� LVO Lut �.Y �."i: OrCw ac '. t . v «ao bY° C90uq LCp v�q bGp i 1 .mY (v °yy ^tN •u2TA' V uD� V O. w^ ' Ea .5 g i *C C p N U gw°yY Jy 2 L w. E b •� C d N •� to p,�OnyC:. Lgr�4 uL. 6 ^•y4 N^O a.. of � E U dp NC�.VN C . INH d'.. A M vwNu NjL�T a _N •O Cud. i °bp Lk. pN y.NdO .•� R O E 09q IC ��O O. � 'r pYp� •O rn b� � � L p ° O g C y G P.0 C n° V q� tl ]• O �uw C N D .. Y�.�.^•.d =a dyu•a° �Cd�V DLL Q�g..Ce� • O•RPy §4 UC D bHe� P C:RgO „ J6 qY.1 O qd 4. dLC q= °' C ^iy�OeCy E V<E� 4T.FAS� C�~Cq uoc Na O� 4. y\LLV �2 y COi COb _Lo 'JyN^u.e.RO xwV Nip C E•�. d ru^ ^- FC OU�aw N n n NV OU.dc my O uS R ut� ^ d dS 42 rL d*K15n I1 b N 4 2 A c u tLl p L 9 nqN d, _.0 y A 9. C n i yy C q bG C ? ,` Q y W • NJ .° O u a. O U N Y 4 CE F E • S N yII � S � R_ pCCOnO.uayn I ®�'.. pp gLda.. �{/ P4• N 1 � L� gip. ��i I gur uuNV'.Y V J > C 4mu ` V 6 4 L ngjO= C Y �upQ > >Yq Z" s°ai ci c Se F°q 6•N. ''n4u.�n aq w « .►$ / GCCd OTi0.0AN. 40 o c <r d>,�d9 y L D� Ed Y yr,o a i.. or .o� a`cae Jn�„ Yuy LAN °^ a yo.� d qn ° �• °gw cN A ° as zN Y 6 e vyw °u`pd oo° p N L a.. p Y ac °. ^o No .Gen u y rn-41- ^o •o °nova >2u Noc E e�iq a.b n L' ape oy .°-: b p cLw� ps RE G U cu F. Q. p y,�E LdOar,O V•3ZL o TTTii u C ` b3 3 d d N d0 } •O G« aY OL d uq G V%/ ' ad lyda O (L y G" V 1r! Y Y •� y ° a° d d. N• � 7 ��" %: r A Yr b N= CEE Ed� a'•aUaY.0 d ^' " �N d uaLn b FE Q N.d- ti 'E y Cbu �z°^ Ly.c..qu C7NAN yd.V:a° p oE.r Lv d L «C6 y C° O LNO N° °rn dwu y ° y mw pc co .Gad q» p cN "vLi a n u c� m� 6 d ° r �ma is �.•. n u c� zqL Eyb PU E. "N o •� �. q�« G gy t0 a^ M c O d p v'-� K•°Y rn ARE 4 �O E V. dw.OUp ti `C N"'.. �.0 •j �. O C rN� i• L °.V. d^ 2�S b L d° d ^qdL LqC �Geee ^O �d L Ly .0. d p c W V 9�.=F 9�pq 6�A•hi N S TL..O- Ld �y ,,c,•"N^ b ° bb� d Eb L ^ FS. i m ° °may o auie C �y L _ V O O%NUd+ Nyv�i vTiLi2i dti � s l E c� L VC L LG AC L E 4 ^ S O. W t [ T T EO r =4! 6wx a °y6 W•�'3 yAT L Y o^ = mA Fay . AM YaLr � d y LC �b bum 7 I L p N U CY..G°. y- b L "b 0.y N dAy. C L.pE YL mY 1°.Tx ° �xL Q LC •oy 6yy� qd Ndo VL G E bb O i. ^YO �N V aNEd A° b y q L b � G V '� L y 9 U L N> d � a �"" y d .^ •G^ z 3 2 "40bV yt" QO.o E `vi•y� 6 aLe tr r Y T-. d M N - N SL C S yU EO a2q0. ^ 2 y H b y1 p `L'e °gtpbd ,,.0y L•G� .L+x yG'q��, a 02 9 Lp C YL y SG V duWp CN La p0� P` p2 wdF• WY cOL v =V d ° C ab 4- 9jL "G bE OO.Oi x .coo b�^N qE> L� H' d; .•..a. c dp O. O c a ..� db b C� A •.2 p". nn A' C r. ff btq 0.m °A L CC���' O C conT 9; w L° T po o. E cN y L G J !e NL 6.pYN U 'Z4 v w!• Q t -� T1-Y b L+ GM O Lc qu.W y C a X Qt L G N F 1. d W N L b0 ObbO i - -49 cb P ddC C m a T4 x `i... -yV am ^ou Luvc. LN 6 ^ 4�Nd • -•.d•. u T.ad ndm.un d °_ba u.°n a °n°.E JN90.eCAV PrE pL NCN FM -Z GayY 4E+L•pp F ~I - Y lv1i1 !mil W i M 1 OC ' rn60� E. OLAZC �OAO CO OY p�v dNA Nd'AW ISO 1 aC 0 E'u N pY .+O du SC dp'� QO a..N eN °a p N y E L y p off.. E Lp a+ Ja. 1 oa n E 0 G9 LTpq _ VO L a q"p' y O U, p .7;_m- 0 N N2A" O Oyu ' 'uN dL' �. O O p u A N O E L d d a^ Y T G �D UUU aA d 1J ^ N a p r O D Lb p ° aEi Y °a1A a. c °umo aA o. aY,.� r w d °q aP�D d N� 3 w AEay p a JC 0:j _ 6` y T J N a O Y a ^ W GLL Z {a ^O. LD' aY�ool vL T NGv. ^ YVn p y GAO _ U Q i U yj,p tiir. dT�. as J] .L.c t a 3L4d G c a Qd aAW. Y.adr , pqN - a�a u va acorn C?p u �yd t " E'C a` O 1n N... q uN E c p r o •.G o 3 - L. ., A ZZ d 10 aNE � A ^ y ud NCC N 6�. N T 3 L PL p ^ GN ✓ d U L VA i W p Na°i L' C E3a i..G. NON t d Y y0p c G 6r L a ..G.. L", daY�SO 9p u K. qYp '� ~Y N aq L N p-NN A Lo �liugp W dn0 Cq.�lr du�� H.N a. EL` yN OJT qd GSeJ.- RGG N O > Y p T 6 •+ r r d Y -Cal p q u A: vi2vi ud o 4'A a = % Cu Lv L. oAd» w a Au u t v r L '° IF a �A W i M 1 OC ' rn60� E. OLAZC �OAO CO OY p�v dNA Nd'AW ISO 1 aC 0 E'u N pY .+O du SC dp'� QO a..N eN °a p N y E L y p off.. E Lp a+ Ja. 1 oa n E 0 G9 LTpq _ VO L a q"p' y O A t A v A 6 d V^ K p.r•X R-1 iqa SG T N u ZbN y Lryi qO�O Yv Y q:LT y OV�p t �~ dL. A ^ T Vy A a1 Cr 6ual .�E.q ^�. a1 CM C.»V HE n T L O .p7° Aa 7'a+s 10.0 L 4 U Gj 9Y u Nm OI O1N AULO = o u na ^ - Y A u N t ` L y,r°i OI L p q 2 d G V T N �� L A G C y p G . E j CC t T� XCn da Y N LAb T�On N ~06 dA` 1c A 5w h Y 6a.N }d.GM 6V 6a t GF. G Qnpq WYM0�2 —' U, p .7;_m- 0 N N2A" O Oyu ' 'uN dL' �. O O p q p E A A N O Y r O a N � O j t O p O N O O D Lb p ° ° Y ry. 1 I G� Z 41 ci a •o 1 d aY C and anz � v,ya q -.OU �C`c mggZ E LC^C'd S Ld 9.N �EE. p Wpp Oa ^� q..Bd� �FVy.FFd Eog6 • 'CO _ •_-1 p Sdd - a 2e A.d S4L� W Vim. '� tVC. A.�U a ^ 4C Y d ticCl 2 11'. N � G= pFOL G, � w C ANT VM V d EA CI G N 'n E a A •c D � mp .. .T D up .LI R pp oC d T LL n RO ^ O AA �..E A Dd L ■G wW w wi � EN V �- r,.Y . a 0 TD'.T pl rn. tl,0 N. F JV dGtq r. ✓ o r��9'M �•_^ pL d ggC�I•] M.0 °'.c at a Eq � ud N � .per Cw Typi �.� A ^J .ESL G.w YCI AG � dpa00 aLp w YU Gw T i CAC,I�W D IL �w uU. 4�ECEidV ^ 04a C O . •A, G � n y.� E.rC. d ad .^.. Y- Wes- N� dC. dU a� LXp.. pTC^ Q0. Cu LM } 6 .r C�.•C. 'LOCC6. d �. C J S d 'wr'L a Aw. y _ w 66 Oy dy^ OGx=rC _ .na u. wp S. NO ^W N� Yp Oa �U q a +E ^p O e LO w yY, q ` Fv l'v . . . Qao° Cr H c N a d o 4 a, IL C . ¢ i O L20 aT AO L EC S OTC nsL >� 1 01 ^r+ TO Dates ViA +V V YT E •d 1. as MC A- p dCD O d L• _ E c LCO� ^ f d.A�ot L L ;a F,C dw- O 1- fYL d 2F at 72 yW.vf L 6 A L 4 0. D N Od 6tJD •�CE LN7 9CC W U 4q �6 vz-- ypj UG162¢M.. y�Nq O • N R \\ O 4 . H N M. � •.y \ \ \NJ/ aY C and anz � v,ya q -.OU �C`c S •d yu. _ °ILO `ya _ oA. u`o_'c'v e�i A iV A.�U aT. a^de Y d ticCl 2 11'. G= v ? ^ uNeu 'n Ca c O C E L y s C O ao T LL n D w 4d0 0..0 7 O 9�Gw.N JV �c d4. CC ppC � .�-2A G �.� N ^J .ESL G.w YCI AG � dpa00 aLp w 6 } L. �O N dyu L 9 i C J S d C D A CO D N y Nw A, ^dn DO � ANC VLIy}� ^p O yY, Fv c N a d o 4 a, IL C . ¢ i O L20 aT AO L EC S OTC y OG >� 1 01 ^r+ TO Dates ViA +V V YT E •d 1. as MC q< L AkNAO dCD O 'D U iy d0. LCO� a° f d.A�ot fjmw L ;a 60.00 UW{i W ®.X V R.a�V YA YGGr Dd. SIWNG y�Nq E u V eL }i a � • � � d Jp 0.. Op � E .tea ° L der. cp)y iJ l xr M6 'p L x:C. - C .dn tr Ci r aaa E�a G_ �=G U9 •L.r� �'^ Q�. Ye.. C a o S p Ya NEOrO�3L aT ni �'a Qb A q y L N T C Z� n +• La �9 'pt . ^.� V M p bq C y CNgt 6 yF x Cp ^i CQ a, OE O A o C O Otr V C.4 j Gya. , rx tl9 RCN V O �r nLd y° QL 4u L SR,; E91 L Gt T N s p e et cit Ols pC L. � °. n p0 avwQ yni BatC °M.W 6i q pet m L Y p ti O u+ L O. y 0 G E N GC. ms otC QE p�CO Lm T 7 y gQg ^ C N O G? : O a LO. C ° �• aG °AO� �➢ D• RLa U`�n Lv .: 4.� ouiGq La Svc ^a xo _ �6 d�V4 HL •r•C N uy Gp 3 aA r rn ud�ut`i eG naoA G Lu`•'4 nE ++..AO L O YO :pC Rt ' Ga OS O O O dJC V'u +. LF di • L� +Gl W qb. ° • � Um O'q 6Va. pp'µ C EA N du S Y uu O a E W Lw A 4' ` AO. u O Gx.Na Ot aL.. 6 PtLm. - Lx q x r q appL L ��F QpLN GaAyyC � pV Nu 4 a5Ha ie Na p �= O1ao m'x V1p.4a cnm me an-%'• mE 7 If _ o t•1 wry" - � +a" ❑ C r N 4qS 2� 4 C = L o a C l� dN w LT C. Y QL L v 'J EQ t'! N 6 L E Po , 4 0 f3 0 �p C iLq Ap �> t= t G j n 0 y yk t l N^p: Y GM L N wn.°r Ny. cc L+ �o c y9`Cy � Y L U d cM NY d 6. a � TNT L9 L OG A4 LN pd o c f T p � Tam E O•y Ln Oy Gy r-tea • AN �Y A =y 3y A c N'O Aq. a a�G c� f l d9 dW Nvm- 4N �r N 9 pd a O U Ey C� w C Vyy. 3 d o ^� Q A. cC ddd Y E t y E -0y v m IW Cy Ed+ O o L n d l.p O Arc. Lo. TR Ga EA r- c QC` --a u is ? ❑ C r N 4qS 2� 4 C = L o a C l� dN w LT C. Y QL L v 'J EQ t'! N 6 L Y N n Er �p C iLq Ap �> 9n 2 - a +0+ N LT _ ci i�Y ❑ C r N 4qS 2� 4 C = L u q O T C l� dN w LT C. Y QL 6� ON 'J EQ t'! N 6 L Y N n Er C iLq Ap �> 9n 2 - a +0+ N LT _ ci i�Y ux� 0 da m g OHO O� uVud 00 O .8 C v i r ya g V d O Y yppi Ur �l W 0 LL M O' yy Nw O.dc L y y G � 4Q GIU d m. L W O D.00. G cyi� CyI L N .. 6� ON 'J EQ t'! N 6 L Y N n Er C EE 9 Of L v+ L a L N:5 Y V O y 0 d 4 ci i�Y W� K...t a .8 OG A4 LN pty A a Y1 Y H� v i c S c e N �n q p c c 66 n„p. nj- Y Q A. cC ddd Y E t y E -0y v m IW Cy Ed+ O o L n d l.p O Arc. Lo. TR Ga EA r- c QC` --a u is ? L Y 4 Iz i 1 M O' yy Nw O.dc L y y G � 4Q GIU d m. L W O D.00. G cyi� CyI L N .. y 44; L' -"�vr V p c L 'J EQ t'! N 6 L Y N n W C EE 9 Of L v+ L a L N:5 Y V O y 0 d 6 v .8 ka . A4 LN pty A a _ v i c S c e N �n q p c c •- $.dw. N n„p. nj- Y Q A. cC ddd Y E t y E -0y v C c :0.0 a Cy Ed+ O o L n d l.p O Arc. Lo. TR Ga EA r- c QC` --a E d. Or Aft ? L Y 4 Iz i w= � da Q 4J d dS 49 Yom' •c T 1 max` "gel o I U.9 V n C •L L U9 u L ^ UO �q O ^L w.N. n .°nun _A c om 'w yo oca L.`nd ou � k u L O v. talc M�� N 'I L "d �9 P, F .d OIL CL to .Zd f..l-0 0.9. N i Vey N Cq r r E A IO a I COI. C �. M d� C ttl N 1C 9 .0 L r q ly 4 dun a � "a,1 C °J d'w . 4... V L� qU v E 9Y � � 9 a, G V iVi W 9 L.0 •YT d.^ uw CO.L ti fJ 1 E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CVCAA;o STAFF REPORT p,, r ^ Nc ts, a O O GATE: January 9, 1985 1977 TO: Chairman and'tfembors of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Tim J. Beedle, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ALTA LORA CHRISTIAN CHURCH - Review of outstanding issues regarding CUP 831 -04 for Alta Loma Christian Church, located on the west side of Sapphire, between Lemon and Orange Streets. INTRODUCTION: At the Plannino.Comm -sion meeting of November 28, 1984, the Commission directed star to Prepare a report covering the status concerning the following topics.. A. Groundcover for exposed rg aded areas. B. Design and installation of wall along west property line. C. Lighting plan for outdoor areas. D. Proposed activities wthin,the project area. A. Groundcover Backg ound: Tho approved landscape plan. for the proposed project show the area north of the church site to be covered with a sced for wildflower (Southwest Mix #8051), in addition to an instailed irrigation system for the entire project area. The project was conditiomd at the time of occupancy for installation of the groundcover, per the approved plans. Review of the site has shown that no installation of the groundcover has occurred since the building was released for final occupancy on September 20, 1984. Actic,n: Direct that the applicant install an irrigation system and groendccver for all exposed areas of the remaining site in accordance with the landscape plan within thirty (30) days, 8. Pali uesign Backsround:- The project was approved with the condition that "the existing 3 -foot high concrete block wall which traverses the northerly and westerly boundaries be increased' to « height of 6 feet ". The intent of this condition was to construct a 6 -foot block ITEM L PLANNING COMW 31ON STAFF REPORT Alta Loma Christian Church January 9, 1985 Page 2 wall incorporating the existing 3 -foot high wall. Curing time of construction, it was determined that the block wall which exists at the westerly boundary line was totally on the adjacent properties. With this offset, the applicant built a 6 -foot high concrete plank wall extending along the western boundary line. Because of the grade change and the design of the wall, the applicant was unable to obtain a minimum distance of 6 -feat hick along all parts of his western boundary line. Therefore, th.: applicant used a similar design solution for increasing the wall height which was to install redwood fencing material, structurally integrated with the exsting wall design, to extend 18 inches above the wall height, as approved by the Planning Commission on the southern boundary line. Thus, in no, place is the wall less than 6 feet and in most locations, with- the attached redwood fence material, is now above 6 feet. The applicant: has installed landscape screening material which in a few years will provide a dense landscape screen from the western boundary line. It should be noted that the grade of the property west of the boundary of this site extends well above the chuY ^h site, thus making landscaping the most effective screening. RECOMMENDATION: The wall on the western boundary line has been reviewed and found to be adequate both structurally and in its design. Should the Planning Commission determino that the design of the wall should be further enhanced, a regi,1reirie-nt to stain the additional redwood material to match that of tte existing wall color along the western boundary line would be recommended. C. Li htim Background: Approval of the project was conditioned on the future submittal o the detailed on -site lighting plar (Standard Condition B -0. Further, that condition was subject to t;ie approval of the plan so as not to adversely impact any of the adjacent property owners. Also, a note appeared on the plan indicating that lighting for the parking lot area shall not extend beyond a maximum 12 -foot height and shall be shielded from all single family residences. Currently, the only outdoor lighting is a fixture on each elevation of building. The western building - Elevation has one double bulbed light fixture which holds two 75 -watt lightbulbs. No high intensity lighting exists on the site or parking lot. The applicant has noted a desire to provide lighting in the parking lot area. This would be subject to the conditions of the original CUP approval to require a detailed lighting plan for the site. The condition as worried will assure that any high intensity lighting must be first appraved through a lighting plat which adequately shows screening away from any adjacent reizidential areps. A e PLANNING CO`MISSION STAFF REPORT Alta Loma Christian Church January 9, 1985- Page S - -_ Action: No specific action is necessary at this time. D. Activities Back9r2unti_ Conditions of approval on the Conditional "Use Permit do not spell Tut I ftitation of activities. Correspondence su,;mitted by the applicant at the time of consideration of the approval of the CUP indicates that their church would include "re;ular and,ordinary worship, study and fellowship activities, in a ditiG,': to anticipated preschool schedule ". The correspondence 1/s attached for your review. Discussion with the church has indicated that their typical activities include the preschool operations from 6 :30 a.m. to 6':Op p.m. during the weekday, church activitfaa, "such as study, worship or administration and some social activities such as dinners occurring in the evenings from 7:00 to 10:00 p.m.. Saturday activities include class and other typical church activities,-.,Sunday church activities are from 9:90 a.m. to noon and from G:On p.-.,4. to 7:30 p.m. Action: The Commissicii may wl,;!: to consider additional modification of church activities through Limiting the scope of the operation and the hours of operation which are consistent with the preschool functions. Should this be the Planning Cormission's direction, it would be necessary -for the Commission to amend the Conditional Ilse Permit to add,_ these conditions through an a^aended Conditional Use Permit process: Respt tf i1y.suomitteil, Rick Go-dez I City `J nne R$ :TB:Jr Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report Planning Commission Resolution r I 1 I CITY OF RANCHO CUCA&ONGA STAFF RIFWO T a ,I Z DATE: April 27, 1983 1977 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Frank J. Dreckman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83 -04 ALiA L MA CHRISTIAN CHUB H - The development of a church facility including a 4,05 4 square foot building and a request to operate a preschonl on 4.75 acres of land in the R- 1- 10,000: zone, located an the west side of Sapphire Street, between Orange Street and Lemon Avenue - APIY 1061 - 332 -22. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A. Requested Action: The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit for the above-describe( <`uject. B. Purpose* To create a 4,054 square foot church complex TPhIIse . C. Location: West side of Sapphire Street, between Orange Street. anT emon Avenue. D. Parcel Size: 4.75 acres E. Existing Zoning: R -1- 10,000 (Single Family Residential) F. Existing Land User Vacant Parcel G. Surrounding Land Use and Z�onin � North - Single Family Residential, Zoned R-1-12,000 South - Single Family Residential, Zoned R- 1- 10,000 East - Single Family Residential, Zoned R -1- 10,000 West - Single Family Residential, Zoned R-1-10,000 1 H. Generel Plan Designations: Project Site - Low Density Residential (.2 -4 du /ac) North - Low Density Residential (2 -4 du /ac) South - Ltw Density Residential (2 -4 du /ac) East - Low Density Residential 2 -4 du /ac West - - Low Density Residential (2 -4 du /ac ,� L' e 7/ ITEM C r` - Conditionae Ilse Pd 83 -04 �- Planning Conr4ssion Agenda April 27, 1583 Page ;. Site Characteristics: the site consists of a vacant Parcel w ich gene r, , s3opes in a nortt'Wsouth di ection with an elevation gain of approximately 28 -fe ?t (from south to north) . Current). ;, the site contains a variety of indigenous field grasses, in Addition to a mature Eucalyptus windrow which parallels the easterly property mine. No structures are located on the parce?.; however, a 3 -foot high concrete block wall traverses the nortr and west property lines, with a high wall adjacent to single famil,� residences to the south. Presently, no street improvements exist along Sapphire Avenue. J. A licable ulat:ons- A Conditional use Permit is required for construction o churches and preschool facilities within the h -1 (Single Family Residential) zone. H. ANALYSIS: A. General: The proposed 4,054 square foot preschool structure (Exhibit "A ", Phase 1) is designed as part of a total (fut{; el church complex which will d1rimately provide full ch7jrch facilities including a multi- purpose building, sanctuary, educational ciassr,aoms, and fellowship building. Phase 1 structures consist of a preschool building and play yard which w"l l be located adjacent to single family' structures to the south. Future phases will consist of a main st.nctuai?y centered on the sit: a single story classroom stl uc° ,re, adjacent to single fw".1y residences to the ;Nest; fellowship building, located to the north; and a multi -purnose building which will lie adjacent to the phase l preschool wilding. Th- phase 1 preschool building is designed to acconodatr 80 preschool students, 6 instructors and 1 director. In addition, approximately 100 parishioners will use the structure for temporar,; church- related services. Fort,, -eight stalls are required for both activities. The proposei 55 stalls -:re designed tc provide adequate parking for phase 1. Parking for future phases, including a 70G set `- sanctuary, has' been provided for in a futur. narking area designed to accommodate an additional 119 autos. Circulation: The proposed phase 1 preschool' /multi- purpose ' bui ing an future church structures in general, represent a two to threw., percent increase in daily trips generated along Sapphire Strr:at. Presently, Sapphire Street services approximately 5,700 trips per day, with a future design< capacity of 10,000 vehicle trips per day. Assum,,pg full enrollment of the preschool (80 students) or full attendance /0701 -02 1 -09 -85 PC Agenda 5-of 5 Conditional Ilse- Pe( +t 83 -0 Planning Commission Agenda April 27, 1983 Page 3 ` Aft enrollment of the preschool (80 students) or, -full attendance of future church sanctuary (700 seats), traff ' volumes during peak hours will be within the design capacity of Sapphire Street. Grading Committee. The Grading Committee is presently requiring the applicant to prepare ,a revised grading plan designed to mitigate grading and drainage concerns, Staff will present -to the Commission a critique of the revised plan in conjunction with tdaight °s staff presentation. B. Des_ ign Review Committee: Design review issues typically revolved around integrating the proposed multi- purpose (and future sanctuary /satellite buildings) into the surrounding single family neighborhood. Specific issues include: (a) the piacwtent of structures an the site; b) architectural integration of the proposed structure with the surrounding single family residences; (cl providing adequate buffers ( landscaping, sound attenuation wails) between the proposed structures and the surrounding residential area. Specifically, the Committee recommended increasing thti he-ght to of the existing concrete block wall_ (which buffers single family resi&ices to. the south) eighteen inch,, or construction of a new wall in order to provide minima.: round attenuation and buffering. The Committee also suggests #d V;e placement of a landscaped buffer to be designed to screen thq proposed preschool and multi - purpose building from Vqgle family residences. These recommendations have been incorporated into the conditions of approval which are listed on the attached Resolutionx C. Development Review Committee* The Development' Review Committee recommended the installation of full street improvements along Sapphire which includes sidewalks, curbs, gutters, street lights, landscaping, etc. The Committee also recommended providing a 10 -foot wide landscape buffer adjacent to single family residences and increasing the landscape setback along Sapphire in order to reduce the view of the parking area. In addition, the Committee recommended the C planting of street trees and landscaping along the entire length of Sapphire Street to mitigate the removal of the existing windrow due to street widening. ka =tly, the fr` Committee recommended locating preschool equipment �t'4t!nty (2) f feet from adjacent single family parcels. I .; j Conditional Use P4 .%t 83 -04 Planning Commisgi4,;Agenda April 27, 19$3 Page 4 -- D. Environmental Review; Part T of,the Initial Study has been comp ete, by the Applicant. Staff completed the Environmental Checklist and found no significant adverse environmental impacts related to the construction of the project or the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit due to the following mitigation measuPes; o inclusion of sound attenuation walls, dense landstape buffers /screens and deep setbacks o relocation of structures to increase neighborhood compatibility o inclusion of full street improvements and drainage structures o limiting preschool activity hours, - -and maxin;am number of preschool 'students Ask limiting structure heigiats to one -story o architectural integration and compatibility of building materials, color, and 64isign. I;ll. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Findings listed in the attached Resolution are supported by the following facts: o The project provides setbacks, landscape buffers /screenes sound attenuation walls, architectural elements, and improvements to make it- compatible with surroundilig- -- residentiai uses. o The project site is adequate in size a,.. shape to accommodate the development and the proposed uses are in accordance with the objectives of t,4e General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. o The proposed building design and site plan, in conjunction with the conditions of approval, are consistent with the current development standards of the City. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public 'hearing in The Daily Re ort newspaper and notices were sent to property owners within 300 —feet of the subject property. Please find attached correspondence from Minister ,McClary outlining a{ plan revisions, church activities, and preschool hour, - Also attached is correspondence from Mr. and Mrs. Palmer, neighboring homeowners. Conditional Use pk.it 83 -04 Planning Commission Agenda April 27, 1983 Page 5 In addition to the above correspondence, the church held a meeting on Thursday, April 23, 3983- (7:30 p.m.) with concerned homeowners in order to mitigate their concerns. Topics included: Site Plartnin o Appropriate orientation and location of proposed and future structures on the site. o Appropriate location for the preschool play yard. Architecture a: �' Compatibility of the church and preschool structures within a single family neighborhood. a Integration of roof materials and appropriate color and type. a Screening of mechanical equipment,. o Height of structur2s. Sound Attenuaion /Visual Buffers o Noise generate y preschool and multi- purpose activities. o Sound attenuation and perimeter wall extensions. o Landscape buffers. Circulation /Drain r$ Traffic generation along Sapphire Street. o Parking along Sapphire Street. o Site drainage /runoff Church Activities o Type and hours of operation of preschool activities. o Type and hours of oppgrati;,n of future outdoor church activities (nighttime activities). V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended teat the Punning Commission 'con t "aa public hearing and receive all Public input on this matter. I€ after such consideration the Commission can support the Facts for findings and conditions of approval, adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Delaration is recommended. Conditional Use r ; pa .jt'83_6€ Planning Commission Agenda April 27, 1983 Page 6 Attachments: Exhibit W - Site PlanMaster Plan Exhibit "B" - Existing Conditions Exhibit "C & C -1 " =- Elevations Exhibit "B" - Elevations Exhibit 'E* - Surrounding land Use r Exhibit "F11 - Conceptual Landscaping Correspondence - Alta Loma Christian Church & Mr. & Mrs. Dennis Palmer E � Resolution 1 i i • I � HO�°iH r .�'t��r� 1�� CROSS SEGTION l , }PHASE •• Y < ���r - - iyM 5... 1.NLL Jam". Y�' . aurnagw Aan S • w `� I PHASE • 9 PHASE 2 m t. .aaa.vriew.. tom, ,ws � eecnseruaar � * ,i � "tea. s_ Brae � w.maer –+�s. Iwraus " 1 �Y fit SAPPHIRE STREET SlJHM1��+ -Y i rw�se + 7ri. ^.s mew— tFs�ss t r:rs A cv+s�tT,c- F SIIrE . PLAN SGtiE Y4' . tewsc. t- wau,�+r. tNVOSa- tU'A.a ?TCRVl6 tKnvivsv —. (1MY S � I MMIY= (� gsLi.�iN /YlA Ce.591'aM�— � MaSi=A 14tJi'fJ� I NORTH CITYOIL/, ITEM: if�T (ff��}Q� (T [/���[ a NCH A � - V iJT`Y...L 1tNION 1 1 l.. L r-' —� 4 elata ' l PLANNING DINTISO�3 Ex`FiII�iT=_,e6t_ Lr—, e 11 NORTH CITY OF ITEM.- RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNM DIVLS N EXf- imr. -t-SCA E - 1. i ,ilr {rrfU if fll �.: 1i '9, .. 1ucnNa �. 1�71�111'I(fitllt'll (•III'I(IIIII� 111111H1IIIIIIt�lllllll�lli�flifF� iz i-1�1... �f -/ II i j icon � a.z...�n :ow psi' FRONT ELEVATION lsva �- � al 110.. �.� NORTH Nx:.o. SIDE ELEVATION PHASE I EXTERIOR ELS- VATIONS V N URTH CITE' OF iTE� I RANCHO CL'Cr TM01TG TITLE: PLA" NI>NG DIVISUN EXHIBIT: SCALE. I� K -�. • i�l�!(il .i7 ,r' i. i? i� ( ;� , ` r'' ?'u:z i.��lj(�;l i ? W FMT REAR SLEV/!' t6fiil ((;W 111 W NO. \ al. ♦ s� IIPML SOUTH SIDE ELEVATION EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS FORTH CITE.' Or, iTF.NI: RANCHO CMULIIVIONGrp TITLE: Pl.tlINNII`:G DIVISIO.`J F- XHIBIT:-� SCALE- • ' y4t WI1N6 �� . .�.._ ,• i� Ott . b.o EAST FRONT ELEVATION NORTH SIDE ELEVATION PHASE 2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS s,rr,,,, r. ,,.,o• NORTH CITY Or ITEM. RANCHO CUCAT �ir}NNGA TITLE- PLANNING DIVISION E.xH[nlr:--0— SC tLE= �I i ■: . b.o EAST FRONT ELEVATION NORTH SIDE ELEVATION PHASE 2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS s,rr,,,, r. ,,.,o• NORTH CITY Or ITEM. RANCHO CUCAT �ir}NNGA TITLE- PLANNING DIVISION E.xH[nlr:--0— SC tLE= �I ,moo . { \tea N a DV' LL7 d ! O x Iq . 0>el a(A1 n.1 O r_ '3a ®rI n D js f 3'� x > as C sa • n ❑Y. (a s , J tl sis LR u C) t�: M4cn� I.4 •. ^. Q• s tt1�4Y � > .i w.>i�ai ? n 1 �,. x i t4 \`, j w�j n. iu 1• e i S E _ Cw s T 'e I.T ava, — v Raft \��3' $ ' .. ()w =N ..a lKe ..:1 .>.1u .•v a .rg »fin: y ii 3 s � V" i 9 I'3 �1t7 _ Q V naua/+s ;u w.D J.i ° b \- �_� � b7 na .1 s ,� � 3� � ug ray •' 4 Jf _�ry `•;l �* a 0,� $J�.. G. Q..�.. � ZD Ie iii se a y « SITE PL AN — % .w.K NORTH CITY Or, IM Ai \CHv .OUNl 'GA TITLE: 5urrowyvA ,i No� PLANNING DIVITSION EXHIBIT. E*- SC�ILE:' A t so % It .. Ga A ® IRs tali � j' z r-at� IL �P rf -Ta s r 0 1 Ll R t Iva tua MANE FORTH CITY CrF IM RANCHO CUCANIO,\,GA TITLE PLANNING DIttISICs i EXHIBIT- SCALE: RESOLUTION NO. 83 -55 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA 'PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 83 -04 FOR THE ALTA t LOMA CHRISTIAN CHURCH LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF SAPPHIRE STREET, BETWEEN ORANGE STREET ANn LEMON AVENUE IN THE R- 1- 10,000 ZONE j - WHEREAS, on the 15th day of March, 1983, a complete application was filed by The Alta Loma Christian`_;fiurch for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 271th day of April, 1983, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above- described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga P1anr,;;,g Commission resolved as follows: SECi'v„ 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, and the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed; and 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 3. That the proposed use will F _ with each of the applicable provisions of the'Zoniq Ordinance. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on April 27, 1983. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 88 -04 is approved subject to the following conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. That the exist" block wall (which lies adjacent to single! family dwellings to the south) be increased in heigtit 18 inches in order to provide sound attenuation and buffering or a new wall constructed to ach eve the same purpose. In addition, this wall shall be extended to the westerly property line. ,l -f 1: // Resolution No. 8,3 -t5 Page 2 ' That the existing three -foot high conc'rate block wall, which traverses the northerly, and westerly property bo,,mdary, be increased in height to six feet to buffer surrounding single family residences, 3. That a 10 foot dense landscape buffer be provided adjacent to single family residences to the north, south, and west (parking areas included). Details and phases shall be shown on deta?led landscape plans. 4. All laws and regulations of the State Department of Social Services relating to licensing of children's (education) day care facilities shall be, complied with prior to opening of the school, f' 5, If the operation of this school cau - ;:% adverse ` effects upon adjacent Properties, the Goriditional Use Permit shall' be brought before th6% Planning Commission for their consideration• aq.o possible termination of such uses. 6. Operation of the school shall' not tpmmence until such time as all Uniform Building Coda and Title 19 J of the State Fire Marshall's Regulations have been compl4ed with. Plans shall be submitted to the Foothill Fire Protection District and the Building i and Safety Division to show =.ipliance. 7. All supervised outdoor preschool activity will be limited to the hours of 10:30 a.m.. to 11 :45 a.m., and 4:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. daily. 8. Expansion of the preschool' beyond 80 students will { require the approval of a modified conditional use permit. i 9. Preschool play structures shall be setback 20 feet from adjacent single family pa .els. 10. All proposed and future structures shall be limited to one story in height. 11. The master plan for the entire site is approved in concept only. Precise design and site plan review. will be required for all proposed future phases. M1j i - r Resolution No. 83 -55 Page 3 12. The street improvements along Sapphire Street shall include grading and street paving with an asphalt berm along the adjacent property to the south as necessary for drainage and protection of the neighboring property. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF APRIL, 1983. PLANNING COMMISSIO 10F1 CITY OF MCHO CUCAMONGA i BY • . an pelr rman I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was .duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commissions held, on the 27th day of April, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, STOUT, BARKER, OUAREZ, REMPEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONt"RS:" NONE l i -e I AMO C 29 D C C.N qy P� p.�. A D.- o °e n A V.� D•E m^ N Y t om•° D• V .n p 2 q d N T w d � w a G 6 c 6 u o o .D C d .- dOv Aa y y DpL NO AY D A Y j9 .� >` daq n6 Np � y�j 2•N 40 ' qp .•NaA dt Leo aN d Vd. OlL dq aO�Y Lq6 A� � Nov YNO LndC >Yq A pEq wp d'� N LY WE r-i OM AG yN E 6 'c yLi2 C�NTA dV~=rna� CO:p L ✓p dN 6 �C •�OV C Td Y... L2� ' H C� O'C b9 •�`. i�.-q pNi tuw. -O Na L qa N pIY � C N aG � .dam„ LOW AL CLC C4 Y Q dGw yD dd p9 DV-CO Ntti C 2. NyA VC jL aT ;J Od C d LDNd yA '• OE.a� ^.pa Gd..9 y y � L ytjy p, Sgv�AL. YYy ,pa CN 60o y_ q0 EE d•' ; Ey`, vo € O AC p dQ Gdq T F Y .p L E O� O T ... Z L + x a NO i L d 4.v ou Y ?• 6 d �A owv dd Ara y o 6npao 4 ^a 6A <� fo-nN a F=G Ny4 A lei •D OS O� ay •M .� •+ _ r I • � L9C T•� dVN • �� V��L Na.O �, i I u 1 ALL YV 'Gif t� q '.YVC �At ban 4 OY �qY dGq LC OqG pD rQ1:6o iL 4y �� M p- +NQ aEaE Oy yy y.=d pN e,'c y c Lieu RZ7 L c d +J. C C q N Y C �° L9 s c.p N d C �- s .qy.c � N C i L,°i i. {` d € U CC O�c O N 9 U?A qpY 6 SLn• n ti �60� uV lu 9NN VQ. ld"li 41 aj c d o _ � �K ci i D.I s C a >C °pcy •�O N. Q 0 ii. d 2DOC iyygqC � ^Y 2S. 9C La ,S 6p aL T _a y9a CV N yj0 Cr ;.. D •pn J VI A G FNE YO �t� ^9}O • N'•L �.Y d�� L N OT CO ^• �Cf CLM1M1,b.6 c- C io F d U UO �A L > VDS ° d .OTC DN ^y. d y.Na vQ1 A q C Q r\ •t� ^. Y Y~ p NS OR�N V IY6�.6 ^. r0 PUS iNa Od iDgm ff LY 4 � .r• _r J N M: D .a Pt1t M '�' a _ _ - -.91. ° °rC c c O O nO C G G f�E OR t q p On � �` n GC GL A Ask u f�.. Q QEg4E0 ?U qd= u u p b O. - nL6 G LL - w S C CnY - > L L w v O n db V L -Gb m��tl r V Vb,J Sqr m mq. f fT y yt °N C Ca OC Rc..'p9'J Er.�i u uN .ems d d q q. -d0i _C E E..:. tll.N yy °c cNNy, c c Np � �E r r ° °n6?d erd4 2. Sr �.°.. ao p °al no - -B'�.. i,. L L9 u u nt. L ? ?•ter Srp' p ? U N N N N L T O C G ° Ad6 O O° N N A p u ° R U °Qyy -,R .- ; ; 2b v ?G 4 4 p pC.-� V VNV �q DBE ' p pbYb WcN+�b ? ?�L.Q yO•C O Rr N O.sJ c c t G R R = U �Y L C E z O 0 N P P1 < Y Yf H H - o - N `O • � �b0 N N - - L L� C L L q��. q6 O 3¢�•ONEy IipO w Z: i i N NE 0 Z; L L NYT ° 0.1 ITn a T T g? d L s s O. n na r rX-9 CdN of N g R u C d G Gu C R R 13 NE p.N T N N q� E E D DCW C Cd r • O OC d +r41 .�;V� •^ p r 9 0 ? ? a C G wO. q JE 000 aO 2 ' '� E O w CLN�NC E EJN �Y NQ ° ° NV G G .pb n bb O pl y` t N 1i C Z Z C LvbiO G C O i iR d C OA_ n YL C`R a ;- Vc a b y ~rQy O z ' L y E _ i O tO•jl O° � �O L pC r r G t t TQ. p p. bi'� d pO • • I h Q C,E 6 b b C CgJ N NNU CNdO L L E V b 64y <UNr' h Wv� r H.vpi 3 l Mi we •l 'e UI Zb dp q " ua Y e ,1 �. _ 11( a c o N _ N ` f •J 4..Q > i C S q ^q w Q Q M •ri 0. P •' 3 'P Gu. EE�q C p VQQ d Y. 'C U N °ol» w E b{• N p w °• C pV a, VC vlC GAO pp C E4 O lj N9 Ey, Vt L '•C.OV YN '22 .^y '� N ut _eRL ❑Rye.. L...Y i q ^y CCw �w wOCY A °^VN NAM d� y.R •.. G♦1C w S q b QC • Olry �« L Y u � > y 40 ypNY gACQ d-r Ly �d � a AYM1 t C OtL RC y +• T4 y C > N06 Jq N C m6 - w ywiJ. dL ANA .20 G N. � L oo aa'C+ OlNO E o•^°• .� d^ tAr Cu 3 LC 00 �A R� c Rf'�p 'RC q YSV. �•y0 �tt�. 0.a CY C w li ci - - q NiL ^u G V 0 L •O+ 00 d rn fa L d mTt Ludo A � b Y m +✓ o 0. 4 G �t U R - C � •26W Nb 4Y G q rydry. G S� +p C EC1 S1F.f1�i G 630.0. W &2 4L1 �U NN° N. GRG04f 6 Y40•N 6 1 +.. IF! alp# S PS a :C OHO �D OC �LL ..C. -LAS c Nri b�, � Cm 9L t °�v q N V° t W L0. Y + V O t UdNti y C O y G =p.�u Y 0.iY �p Y. b: NCN N •'A U br C QY 3 C3C w V y w Mo•'' ^ty by ^ ALO 1 4 6Q q mg Lit t. P^ d P� q N C C •N � M L° p Y 4 p 4 L Y Z4 C A L ^; t L O P L= M1 Qp1 p y •.COQ a � d SAM dr OI pba°+ 3 yL.a Uo N Cqp 3 C 4b�01 O RR��.Nn Cy 4C SL.w 9ja q Q' 4NG. ^ o -� u'-- _ A _ Yy^ �.u. d"q a •p d� ��0. Qq o csy°.A'��.a. 4 � Q °•oaw. U pp i O'V 0L Dpd N Yiq Q. �AUC o�� � Oqw R ° G q R w Y C H � M N q 3+ ESL Jy A.n,•� � L d YY C w.. $� ^N � q Yy,'i.ry pbb.q SO L AWC�IN �Y.Q qgg aML BL Y ^y. 0.dr N^Q... WD�. 4C� Yl�j• wl°,.'pi � V. EC•�� O 43p13 4 9.p D w. 0.rAq v. ^yY �N w O.O NV G bL�y d„b�r L4 D d pLIC u.�n OEOaOi t� Y R r A� � 4 p. 6 O. N w ab L a° Y "` 3ggC Y� 4 0 O d O Y ti M. •° D ° LAC YQ6! U Y °l y�� L l glfl -y Y° C04 h�0. V A e • C A G w LC 3 LL Ar @O Ny. ^ C.D LG NYJ� 3'C Y j �C rA= w ��}1 L p yf °AK Y. L A C L N =W^ N` 9 A O A bha. Y A d b• 3.^ a 5° p Y Wn'pol L OC 'CVdQ� w n ° O O; t~R..•Y ° ° VLC V C !g aAL 1 Y O L @ pVw;Ld'Y Y —1 O. . q N 2 u yyC � yC +C ; z "at Ny wA°•�bJAiN y tCyL 6C ^e !; 4N 2N4 y .0 w G..Y �• •C A�O4 J w L O 31N`J N .LdP Lwpp Cos l�d�i hw•�i d YW SY . Ud d ^53. V.•• Nwo 11 V O .-A Ol JLQ�� y�TMM. p[Y� h LL -d c.cu z twd vrnQN L r a �. z n Z. O ow Aar o« O 5. c o.Cc «r - °. rn °. •^ De 9.�a Eo y N« « T O + 'oaN �' icy mil v � C N ^�yO j rOaL y �• E LO. .. id ^ Oa Od CJE�! K Or ..�. • R 'tYmq WVaL• ^4 «. NdL9y UQC R A dda dA° A b E C t a N E y C.q� O C gg ¢« d C A W u°r cU Y�.r- n «O lr^y 6•e°•a tOh °LOf u RN « aasnc 1�. d�. L' v. N Y. t q�ON L.a.' V �E dR SM ar « O ya. c aa1°+ y'v. "^ u �a La r..N o 7s C@ i n=om ad A ^o.. N Cuo °� �ytlRiO ;.~.e d ��SRm 6•, i. - ' aA rd 1t ^ O NiN o^L 6 . ° uy No"c' L a w 6= L °.« E ? O U 4 C Y.. U 9 q a" "= V C.o • p1q� 9° .f[.�O ^qtt C Y ^G LQ G ° 9G Y hVeLi� °OS uL. d`,•.0 Cl N,q NVA I C NN 00 O ��{ h•�Q PEE Q Q N N eN00 O ^E ^� LLO],Q� 40Y..Y001 Y= d M. ).T G � a J • E °r ^C`'. o��` 9 U^ • d b �:t..q. ,M1.q AeN. q.rcd 1. U D Cai•'ud ud dygggg��� Of dam:vN 'O 4 rn Q.0 C �A vm do T C a' d rn U arc =rn -day €IcF usu�oiO oo o d a u uU «^ yv O'y 4 � 6 .-q. x�t 'a t. °.0 Y y0 d A �rC W CC+^� O RN u y� 09 La G G yyO .O C �LU yN =1�� A.a^+�N C Y Vim. EA tM d Y USN CNN 4.N�Y@ O. d de L x ..9^�. '�dar Dr i cL y a 0 ^.o cr ot v Corr. dom L no q Md tO p. a =aA Bo « a Yx.,_ �^ tie z"i y LLO C rQL a dqo RT UY� y O.O Mb y rwy yd E. ✓ IA Cam. « A4 OAS AV Orc Y d ^pa C;Z oo T ^O C V O. JC. ^0. . Y W YON A y L a A yo vd y L « Nom. UAi;,y> d C L vTQ N y F q'• �.r rn� W ru d YC c9 -CC 9v g JLdOCr '� LO U D.O N LL A °Y hd ' 9« EOV�1L a+' D°r� N$ C? gMO?J_ v� L�F QffiN m d m` `p Sir °hLL dC CLN a LN wO�« ' 21LLNR N O rn^ b ^eA t•LtW L 60 Ga{LN scR G.•••4Y.p 1(I � C M'. x 6YD Nb WYL•: • Q0.. i•�L•- iJ3n2 D D n Ni f N' pf Q G N ., 4fl r.• O d � o w 4 uW J.L.. 60 C� Vi J i C O s� �Y U'i•' C1 U� r � AL` G S� V 4 pp C d C. CO G M � M ud 6GU U� C u+ =hC G rn r vae a c 2 d� A c NT• 'O p y6 °C G S• E b 'p q y �O AV ° C O `C CNCtyO C T N Z•+C 3a Wr Q,hC.N W,. yW NW UD O .D Na: wy C3Q- Ot 24 1e EEN O�` AwYa A� N6 �.0 4W Cam.. _ L �C �Y CVYL C G'O fi O ' L V� '^C L Y. n� D L G • p � L ` mdm s ° GGA i• � od o °'C>6A L w+aG A CT LN y =p aCjr1 •yG EEUS (mG'r �c�i Ci La Cd p gG»t .�yU4 ♦ A�4 9G G Z. A. aury � 9b DTl �d N ° c . G.+ o $y u .°+.Gn sad R�ECJ �_d bC fa O.^+y. C�33 �wArr� ^t Y N ° a i vr.r iN C ,a .4 vsa a y�aww .GC 4s. ac w...Laye, "VA aL E M mTJ y 4L Nti NN ` d Nob ^40• � �� u V aG��O Y43 � q 2 r1 A oQ NT• 'y y6 °C bLe rn N yLN� ♦ 6 T uL wy C3Q- Ot 24 p Q n N O ' L V� '^C L Y. n� D L G • p � L ` mdm s ° GGA i• � od o ar co tg Me dv 2 a y S•r F� G C p A. � 9b DTl A T G j '.Y CR ra �y R�ECJ �_d bC JJC.G . E M pd vu CA Yr T yY V C _ E mTJ y 4L Nti NN ` 01• qw YC Q� Ot•� q O °tL Tir Qq0 t!'A alit{ Al 4 HHd. y .,i d N F� p L'.d� = tWf yy. �C . s �• b b o• o% ub<A ^N Goo IS o 2y 64 KMr O.b 4ITL WF tigA =S 6LLar bi M1 Xi m T X) w NC 11 f/� L -!Al S u CO ESL � ou ^ LA d6N ^ n ` ONE. WLi � � h nYUc u 9 4 yYr =C lz Zl 21n Y.C= N r� L N.P :d Di duL. G R. rc O"�yb: N L Y R v LoN Y� •Nya ;N y ET d O d E �5- y �•e�c d o C L dti L 'C � LY p.G.op 6aiG� GCS J. GrV1 4 ^w �� �n 64 O.JL» •( i� iC( x� � NI �� _ wo u CO ESL � ou ^ LA d6N ^ n ` ONE. WLi � � h nYUc u 9 4 yYr =C lz Zl 21n Y.C= N r� L N.P :d Di duL. G R. rc O"�yb: N L Y R v LoN Y� •Nya ;N y ET d O d E �5- y �•e�c d o C L dti L 'C � LY p.G.op 6aiG� GCS J. GrV1 4 ^w �� �n 64 O.JL» •( iC( x� � NI �� m � w 3NC h .a N Ci O X Y O- yL D L tq. -.Y,O U LCU 6P 3vEO dC�LY.E �� �� b..c L 9C EO Nail YY y: N .�opa PO t O 7 C N = NY d` 6 �q y E ✓ P z .0 Y. Ci r �N 9 U` 6 N d C d ^ y •" V C Ir � O�w va1 nOar C �W PW ^ qr s+. ry A Y +a ti~. a, YV.. ti H j X z z. 4 6 N 6 M J S �° y i� ._ r. « ti✓ n k .` .,. � J Cl� � . d 4` 'r N 17 f yf 1G +..1- � q S ITY OF RANCHO CJ'CAM+ ©NGA Aftk STAFF REPORT 5 3 LL RATE: January 9,. 1335`" ts;, TO Chairman and Members of tha Planning Comnission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Bohn R. Meyer, Assistant Planner SUBJE 'T: PERIMETER WALLS OF THL VICTORIA PLANYED;GOMffiJNITY INTRODUCTION: At them December 13, 1984 Advisory Czi rission meeting, the members discussed thrii -sues surrounding the current perimeter walls of the Victoria ".a :sited C`ermhunity. The'Advisory Commission members were not c,atisfied with the materials used or the design of the existing perimeter walls. The perimeter walls are constructed of' slumpstone block with river rock pillars spaced every t50 feet. T K ii malls are a continuous straight line and offer no offset relief. BACKGROUND: The Victoria Plan states that the village edges will contain a wall that "varies in setback from the rolled curb, with 'a linear windrow type of planting broken by smalls• informal tree masses and wiii provide the necessary acoustical and }!,visual protection to create a pleasing and functional streetscapell= Under the section "Typical Edge Conditions" (Exhibit "A") the Victorfil Alan text presents a plan showing an offset wall, and accompanying text calls out for a mean setback of 22 feet from curb for walls. Along arterial roads, perimeter walls are mandatory adjacent to "L" or "LM" land uses-,- optional elsewhere. The Victoria Plan does not address appropriate -_ __ materials for perimeter walls. PLANNING COMM!SSIOPt,rRxICY_ The Planning Commission's intent has been to disc lof w Ranrno fucam)nga to evolve into a walled city. The Commission's ppit policies aim to minimize the amount and impact of perimeter wads where possible. In the past, the Commission has approved perimeter walls which utilize the following elements: the offsetting os the wall and inclusion of planter area, a variation in materials or height, and incorporation of landstapi'ng and other indigenous material where its Use would provide theme Or character. Included in the Terra Vista Community Plan is a section concerning the design and treatment of walls. ITEM M PLAMM C SSIOK STAFF REPMT Victoria Piant4ed Commaity - Perineter Walls January 9,: 1966 -Page ?_ i PECOMF"TxOK- it is re�e ded that,the Pi ling Cessissua give staff directio.a to develop additional design policies tc,E ds halls in the Victoria Planned amity. Staff recMuends th ;tt the Comission adWt policies similar to those used elsaft'�re in tile- City,. The intent of these policies is to provide visaal relief and a variety of streetscape. ���ittedy Exhibit °A° - Victoria Commmity Plan E=S -ne_, Wiihit *BO - 'Terra Vista Community Plan Excerpt,, �l cam'- TYPICAL. EDGE - ON ITIO I<i ILLIKEN, HIGHLAND, BASELINE-, FOOTHILL 'Section at Residential Land Uses - awaadc crirr�s a atra,uss ssek ,s;r�cwsNk .7 S'.r�k� G dvsulcy •� � -� ,7 crrvaxi 1 ms's. Lxalcr'iw �" .. L�aR�vKmCi .7, " • Qa'�" iuktid `sus � �M°k A+quna. sw. i 1 a � ..+=# '/5 3rtedlta+ra• 4Yfs. � 44& � 3uu�a:Jaur..t4tc :� 6` � � �5'mtx. IJ9K e//( "pfGMf(� Y �M. nFIY1.YRCC.C• ,.. Dian rrgularly rxcset t r�s iwxtrcfiaw r�itul+vN Ss+1is Ptui +z� (y�.� p�t�� dcsra+c[c tus4ts r g00 =p s 3o0D R -3w m i f000 {t t5oo 1` Soo drat T'ns NFad�or.ayfcpfaRt�iraslrou4dEc �) :kne mxss awreratkcf CITY OF RANCHO CUCAXIOiN A TITLE: 1tt£.-rop'Jr4 PLrs.►'�ItitIi \'G DIX'ISIaX. , E. . a One of the major objectives of the Terra Vista landscape gdidelines has been to promote variety.. This will be achieved by: a Varying setbacks for both walls and buildings G Gen: y meandering sidewalks with alternating ' plantings of tall, columnar or conical trees in conjunction with the sidewalk curvature e Providing opportunities for ample laid, scaping; and berming. e The staggering of walls at singI,\- fa'aly residential developments to create shadm \ line and to permit additional landscaping (k, yre IV-9) o Varying wall heights where permitted b y tits, e 1 conditions (Figure IV -9) In addition, special consideration hus beer •givgp .xc a+- ,_r to setbacks where the major arterials in (er: ett collector or secondary roads. At these loy`6ybris, entrance nodes will be created —and vislblfitj, of �i(enoflndemation mWall the intersection improved --by additional setback requirements. Within 15 feet of the right of way " of the intersecting street, the minimum setback on r: the major arterial for both wails and buildings will f 3 be 38 feet from curb (see Figure IV -7): --� 11� Plan of Stags, rid Wall Elevation of Staggered Wall - I Elevation of Flantets/Wal) - - m Elevation of Wall with Breaks FIGURE IV-9. Possible Wall Treatments slang Major Artnfata IV -8 c�iY 01-7, HEIM, RANCHO ,'CAMT O 'GA TITLE- sw* PLz1VNI \'G DIrISiM E,M SCALE- 1 11 Il n CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT - DATE: January 9, 1985 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Victoria Park Lane Trails c41CA tT 5 o F Z ci a 19n I. BACKGROUND The William Lynn Co. is nnw processng Tentative Tract Maps 12832 and 12833. These tracts represent the final development of the Victoria Windrows Village and will begin the westerly extension of Victoria Parkway. This extension raises several design and operational issues which require Commission review. These issues fall into four general categories. o Trails Location and Design o Parkway Grading L Roadway Edge Treatment o Recreational Performance Criteria Upon review of the following analysis, Staff requests that the Planning Commission provide guidance to Staff and the applicant further defining tha design concepts under consideration. II. ANALYSIS A. Trails Location and Design 1. Location: Staff has reviewed the operational characteristics of a trail within the median island and identified several significant concerns related to safety and maintenance. These problems were discussed with the Trails Committee and it was concurred that locating the trail on the northerly side of the parkway would be acceptable. It is staff's opinion that the northerly location will provide superior uninterrupted service because of the following: The Victoria Parkway median is cut by several major traffic arterials and significant other road connections which will require the trail to shift northerly through nearly half of the parkway length. This includes all of those portions from westerly of Rochester Avenue: to easterly of Day Creek Blvd. and the oortlons westerly of Milliken Avcilue. Movement in and out of the parkway for short distances creates a hazardous situation for those attemping to use the median trails. i ITEM N PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT j Victoria Park Lane Trails January 9, 19a5 _Y j Page 2 Left turn movements across the parkway are somewhat difficult for motorists to make because of the width of the median and sight l restrictions introduced by parkway landscaping. This configuration makes activity in the median difficult for the motorist to perceive and f hazardous for the trail, users. Trails require a basically flat cross section. With the parkway sloping in a north -south direction, the trail effectively becomes a drainage swale. This situation will cause problems of erosion and ponding which seriously impacts its usefulness for pedestrians and joggers. Movement of the trail to the north in conjunction with a sidewalk addresses some of this concern but trail drainage remains an issue. Connection to regional trail elements, parks and northerly equestrain areas are better provided from the north. The Parkway aesthetics and drainage of the turn pocket nose areas will be enhanced with removal of the trail. A trail on the north can be designed wider and can incorporate the standard rail fencing which should add to the rural character of the parkway. 2. Design: Typical sections of a proposed parkway design have been provided by the Lyon Co. for Tracts 12832 and 1283.'. These sections show a 10 -foot wide trail with fencing abutted by a 4 -root sidewalk. The trail and s ?U`ewalk would meander through the parkway right -of -way a minimum of 10 feet from the edge of pavement. Only the street side of the equestrain trail will be fenced but it has been suggested that the rail fencing be used at the Parkway right -cf -way to accent the .rural character. The northerly edge_pf the trail will act as a drainao: swale for the northerly slopes and trail drainage. It is proposed that this water be carried in a grass Swale to collection points and piped under the trail into the Parkway drainage system. Irrigation design should reduce to a minimum the drainage characteristics of the trail element. The southerly side of the street will contain a 6 -foot wide meandering sidewalk. B. Parkway Gradin The Parkway was anticipated in the Community Plan to he an area where grading would ccur. The east -west orientation of the Parkway makes it a suitable location to include slope areas. The current submittal includes nearly nine feet of drop from the north to the south with the southerly parkway, sloping downward to the south. It has become apparent that the trails, street section and sidewalks require significant flat areas resulting in the remainder of the landscaped area being ohsorbed in N � 11 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Victoria Park Lane Trails January 9, 19.$5 Page 3 slopes. Maximum utilization of the median area for slopes (assuming no trail or sidewalk) would be desirable but extreme slopes in other areas would seem to conflict with the recreational elements of the Parkway design. The south parkway as proposed in the current tracts and the Community Plan envisions slope drainage away from the roadway toward private development. This creates a situation where significant areas of public right -of -way will he drained towards private property. The maintenance and liability potentials created by this, situation makes drainage along the south Parkway boundary a sensitive design consideration. For this reason, we would recommend that the Commission establish some performance criteria for both recreational space and slope limits. C. Roadway Edge Treatment It was the general direction of the-Commission thL+,- the Parkway design incorporate roiled type curbs to delineate and staL4,1ae the roadway shoulder. This condition can be accomplished easily with the exception or the most southerly curb. The collection of street and median parkway drainage along the sout'n pavement edge and the likelihood of periodic sump conditions along the street require a positive 5arrier along the south roadway edge. This can be mitigated with provi' =ion of a vertical curb with a modest parkway rise or through rolled curb with a graded berm rising a minimum of one foot above the flow line of the rolled curb. The need to blend the rolled berm t� provide a rontoured appearance would require a 10 to 15 -foot area. This results in steeper southerly slopes south of the berm or an increased parkway width. The vertical curb face provides n easier solution to this barrier concern with minimai grading impacts. O. Recreational Performance Criteria As the Commission is aware, Victoria Parkway was considered to be a recreational element for the purposes of park fee credits. A summary of the Parks, Lakes and Community Trails for Victoria are as follows: Village Parks Lake and Lake Edges Victoria Parkway Community Trails TOTAL 40 acres 20 acres 35 acres 5> acres 100 acres As you can see, 60% (60 acres) of the recreational lands are ab, —rbed by basically trails elements and lakes. The slope conditions alongl.rail and Parkway elements can seriously imdact the recreational utility of the remaining areas. If not carefully reviewed, Victoria Parkway can become simply a widened roadway with abutting equestrain trails. PtANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Victoria Par4 Lara Tra 1z - January 9, 1985, Page 4 The Commission may wish to consider in conjunction with slope and li ° - -ge critieria, establishing guidelines for usable space along the Para.., for passive recreational uses, It may be possible to open adjacent development t periodic locations along the Parkway and pull elements of the parkway into the neighborhoods. These expanded spices could be utilized for passive recreational uses, act as mini parks and provide drainage opportunities. It is difficult to fix a precise goal in this coacern but a percerstage in the area of 30% to 40% could represent a starting�,Ioint for discussion. III. RECOMMENDATIONS I A. It is recommended that the trail element be relocated to the northerly side of the Parkway and that the median island provide a focus for grading opportunities and aesthetic a :�jhancement. B. Grading of the Parkway shall conform to -the following general c ;teria: 1. Areas utilized for passive recreational purposes should not exceed 5:1. 2. No more than 25% of the slope area should be 2 :1. 3. Average slopes of 4:1 in parkway areas should be a guide for overall design. 4. The median area slopes may increase to a 3:1 average throughout. In all cases, slopes shall be contoured to eliminate and "Engineered Look ". S, A detailed parkway grading plan should accompany each development proposal to insure compliance with slope guidelines and drainage facility needs. Street profile designs may be required for extended portions of the Parkway to verify street drainage constraints. 6. Puhlic right -of -way drainage onto private property is prohibited. 7. All drainage shall be positively directed toward pu4iiciy owned and maintained facilities. 8. Where drainage is collected in swales at the right -o€ -way line, a minimum of two feet of masonry wall shall be constructed to retain and divert flows_ _ 9. The design of drainage facilities should ba incorporated into the design of recr= -hational spaces where possible. &~ ell PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF 'REPORT Victoria. Park Lane Trails January 9, 1985_, Page 5 _ C. The Commission would. appear to have three options on roadway edge treatment: 1. Uniform rolled curb edges with a mounded berm area with one f'not rise on the south parkway. �t 2. Rolled cu-.-h or, all edges with the exception of vertical curial on the most southerly cvrb. 3. Vertical curbs or, both outside curbs with a rolled curb in the medizoi. It should be noted that the median curb would transition to a vertical face at median breaks to provide a positive traffic barrier to protect landscaping and irrigation. It is staff's feeling that Option 2 would provide symmetry and contribute most to the mitigation of steep slope conditions. U. That a goal of 30% usable passive recreational area excluding sidewalks and trails be designed into the Parkway landscaping design. Respe tfully submit ed, LSH:j f 13 Date; To: From: Subject: BACKGROUND: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM January 3, 498$ Planning Commig;sio f r Dick Mayer, Park k t Coordinator RWIEW OF T3T CONCEPTUAL PLAN FOR THE RED HILL CCiMMUNITy PARK Recently, the City executed a purchase agreement with thA, County of San Bernardino anti entered escrow to purchase the 44.6 acre Red Hill Basin for park purposes. Tho prgc oaa nark site was divided into two .distinct use areas, a 7 acre neig.1.barhood parY;, known as Vineyard Park and a 3:1.6 acre flood control detention basin. Tecent storm drain improvements, together with a workable storm drain plan for the basin area enabled the County Flood Control District to declare the basin surplus to their needs. This provided the opportunity for lice City to purchase the basin and tha neighborhood park, for community park purposes. Being one ,f at least three large community park, facilities to be developed within the City, Red Hill Community '.?ark was designed to accomodate many recreational uses. A design,tas7 force, consisting of 16 members of the general pui+lic with various recreational interests, 'worked with City staff and the P7oJFct consultant, Recreation Systems, Inc., to develop the conceptual plan x'--r the park. The plan provides for a park facility* with a large area devota3 to athletic sports activities. Included are two dedicated softball fieldsF:•cwo dedicated - - -- soccer fields, a senior league -regulation baseball field with .a soccer overlay, and renovations to the existing little league field presently onsite.. All the fields will be night lighted for maximum usability. Additionally the park will pzovide extensive individual and group picnicking facilities, an amphitheatre for summer concerts and similar uses, a % ;2 acre lake and associated water feature, horseshoe and shuffleboard courts, several children's play apparatus areas, a jogging /exeroise trail, canceSsi.on and restroom buildings and 3 parking areas for 343 vehicles, The existing improvements at Vineyard Park,with the exception of tlae little league field will be removed to accomodate the new improvements. To the greatest extent possible, existing trees will be preserved and incorporated Tito the park development. ITEM 0 Page 2 1/03/85 - The proposed plan has been reviewed by the Park Development Commission with a recommendation for City Couhcil approval. Upon completion of the Plaaninq Commission review, the Plan will be submitted to the City Council1with the recommendations of both the Park Development Commission and the Punning Commission. RECOMMEMMMON: That the City Planning Commission review the proposei:conceptualiglan for Red Hill Community Park and forward to the City Council with a recommObdation for approval. Attachment CITY OF RANCHO C'tTCEiMONGA JCA MEMORANDUM m d O Date: January 3, 1985 0 � F O Z To: Planning Commissia U 1977 From: Dick Mayer, Park'Prl;dU Coordinator V Subject: REVIEW OF THE CONCEPTUAL PLAN FOR THE RED HILL COMMUNITX PARK BACKGROUND: Recently, the City exeOuted a purchase agreement with the County of Saar Bernardino and entered escrow to purchase the 44.6 acre Red Hill Basin for park purposes. The proposed park site was divided into two distinct use areas, a 7 acre neighborhood park, knon as vineyard Park and a 37.6 acre flood control detention basin. P3cent storm drain improvements, together with a workable storm drain plan for the basin area enabled the County Flood Control District to declare the basin surplus to their needs. This provided the opportunity for the City to purchase the basin and the neighborhood park, fon commuunity park purposes. Beinq one of at least three large community park facilities to be developed within the City, Red Hill Community Park was designed to accomodate many recreational uses. A design task force, consisting of 16 members of the general public with various recreational interests, worked with City staff and the project consultant, Recreation Systems, Inc., to develop the conceptual plan for the park. The plan provides for a park facility with a large area devoted to athletic sports activities. Included are two dedicated softball fields, two dedicated soccer fields, a senior league regulation baseball field with a soccer overlay, and renovations to the existing little league field presently onsite. All the fields will be night lighted for maximum usability. Additionally the park will provide extensive individual and aroup picnicking facilities, an amphitheatre for summer concerts and similar uses, a 1.2 acre lake and asscoiated water feature, horseshoe and shuffleboard courts, several childrenla play apparatus areas, a jogging /exercise trail, concession and restroora buildings and 3 parking areas for 343 vehicles. The rixisting improvements at Vineyard Park,with the exception of the little 1 league field will be removed to accomodate the new improvements. To the j greatest extent possible, existing trees will be preserved and incorporated into the park development. i ITEM