The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1985/03/13 - Agenda Packet0701. -02 0 3- 1;3-85 PC Agenda 0 1-of 4 1 - < IC�NGA PLANTNWP3 COMM IsSfON t 4 err' WEDNESDAY MARCH 13, 1985 7.00 p.m. LIU21 "PARK &DI.MIIM= CENTER 9161 -BASSI RANCHg 01MAX01 A, CALWOM J 'L Plec%e or Allegiance U. halt can � f Commissioner Barker Commissioner 4empel ; Commissioner Chit eaF Commissioner Stout Commissioner McNiel 21. Amounc ements IV. 'Consent Calendar Thd' foiTowinF Consent CaVx,< >..er ft,44s are erected to be routbie and neon- controversial, They k tlw r * 4c %3 oq by the Commission of one time without discussiorC. ' �j a"3rne has`aoneern over any "aaem, it shouta'be removed for dIstI,— A. �iE' EXTENSION POP. PARCEL MAP 7512 - BARMAKFAN ANY - Lacated at the northwest corner of 8th Street r►nd Vmey"arc - APN,.20,7- 271.53, 54 and 55. .B EMIIRONMEN sAL A; 3ES MENT AND DEVELOPMI �T REVIEW 84-52 - COLWELL — To alio.�r%Jthe development .an.a� corner of Helms ;:,Avenue and Foothill Boulevard on ^# r� approximately .44 acres of lard in the General' Com mercial f (GC) District - APN 208-261 -54> h ' V. Paffi c $ea�, Thl following items are public haiiftjs �4 ur Ich concerned individuals may voice their opinion of, the ir2i�irjeo* �Te$s8 wrtit 20 be recocraized by`Lhe Chairman and eddy Commission by stating }roar, x azrle .and address, Ali: such vF,inions shall be UME1 d to S mintft€s per in�Tividual for each project. ' C. CQ3�tI?1T_ AL USE PERMIT 85 -0 - CHRISTIAN FAMILY o , uar�LLQWSHIP A propooaito operate_a�hureh within a 1660 pace witlYiit an ind�sfri &Tpark at the east.side,pf Archi r --, f 1 _,r,,, r,_,,, i Try �v A (. JI ii'iYide A ) b i R y �rN ''sue L tMZZY {A64EfiE ( y .i TA •, - - �aw leaMit — n _ r q r w. s 0 cocAaaRGA- EUA3TI camrT NEIJiBNIL CwY.�1tM Nf[ERr'6tfgatdlC .�MPH.I; � Q ' 4 f ��',. �t � f e (t t i�� •. C/ '�/ v' yr �p ' } �; - � • P�if�� J ti CITY OF RANCHO CUCA VLf NGA STAFF REPORT -DATE: "March 13, 1985 T0: Planning Commfssion FROM: Lloyd B. Pubbs, City Engineer - BY: Barbara Krall,,Engileering TWmfcian SUBJECT: 1_ME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 7912. - :BARMAKiAN COMPANY - Located at the no*-thwest corner or yth Street and vineyards Auenue AP:1 207 271.53, 54 and 55 The above described project was tentative approved by Planning Cmmission on March 23, 1983 for the division a 1.57 acres into 3 parcels for industrial �. condominium purposes within tine G�;vral Industrial Area ;(Subarea No. 1)., The tentative apps ovaT was ,valid for two years and with appropriate 1 extensions, an additional two ,years can be granted ' The Barmakfan Company is requesting an extension oi time because of a: drainage problem on the site, This problem is being resolved and Mans ,for developti t,` e.` have been submitted: „ _ i & RECG'k iENDATICNr It is recommended that a one -year extensian of t1V_ - -`, granted Parcel Map 7912. The new - expiration date W.7 be March 23, 1986, Respectfully su '.tted, LB :jaa Attachments Tentative Parcel Map Time Extension Request Resolution ; ITEM A 6 > o z c ROB- / �.jM .��1•. �Jf}rw't -{ N� ✓% 1 . - °4 «- e ate► . ��1 I t , j([{�1. O� I/ gkq ^� zoasiz ZZ .wW Sj a F Y�. v tY � •. � 3nNatty N3Yr9 �� . •. � 3nNatty N3Yr9 �� BARMAKIA N February 8, 1985 City of Rancho Cucamonga' 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91730` Attention: Mr. Lloyd Rubbs City Engineer Subject: Parcel Map 7912 Gentlemen. - 1 As you are aware,: we- had a major drainage problem which was resolved recently with the !City, of Rancho!�uezmonga grading committee. The subject Parcel Map is due to expire on March 23, t� 7935. Therefore, we respectfully request that. Parcel Xap 9911 be a granted an 18 month extension. `!r Enclosed, pl:ease,find a check for $62.00 � cover your processing fee. I would appreciate it if it could be scheduled £or the first, meeting of tho City Council in March. ` Sincerely, THE BARM N COMPANY re Barmakian ...f,,- �'• 1 1 President AB:Ij M" ;i Enc. - a , SAL(itt+lEFt33c • r' •r.. • ' +� .ES .. w?`•a'r"t+iiCyNyr yy Cy-a' yri k[:y:� �rS"- �aUiT._ ��''[[ A}}�yy�pti �in'}c.Yy11r {. n�yy RR yy roxerag ( Vkr•V[� 31� �«v :t..�il.4 ttr��il ��. B . r RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF ;SHE RANCHO'CUCA0ONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, •; APPROVING THE TIME EXTENSION FO(� PARCEL MAP 7912 WHEREAS, a request, has been �� "led for a tune, extension abov_ ^_ described project, pursuant to Se4;i:ioif= 1,5111.8..2 of'tlrdinance for the , 28 -B, the Subdivision Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally { approved the ' above - described tentative parcel map,on March, 23, 1983'. P SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commisiion has following iIngs; made the A. That current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable to build at this time, 8 That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding ekpirations would not be consistent with the intent of the Development Cade. C. That thdYe has been no significant changes to the ' character of the area in which the project is located Vlat would cause the project to become conforminq or inconsistent with current 1��andards. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission herehY time extension> grants a y ar: 4 Parcel Map � licant Exnirati.on b 7912 8armaklan 6mpany, March 23, 1986 z APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13T}t DAY OF MARCH, 1985. =e - - -- PLANNING COMMISSION OF,THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON6 ; BY: tit Dennis L. Stout, Chairman 1 ATTESTS Ric UOte ,'- '-� ,?uty secretary �. s r x 1, s _ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Gay STAFF REPORT �e �J O Ir` DATE: March 13, 1985 1977 `- T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FRGA: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Howard L. Fields, Apsistant Planner! SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT. REVIEW 84 -E7 - Z01-WELL -,To allow the development of f-a 1586 square foot `fast food ",restaurant located a';, the southeast corner of Helms Avenue and Foothill Boulevard on about 0..44 acres in the General Commercial (GC) District., APN'208 -261 54 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a precise site .21q architectural design, and issuance of a Negative Declari�i`;i. r B. Purpose:-,,,,Development of a fast food restaurant" C. Location: Southeast corner of Helms Avenue an Foothill j Boulevard . D. Parcel Size: .44 acres r' E. Existing Zoning: General Commercial (GC) F. EXisting Land Use: Vacant G. Surrounding 'Land Lisa and Zoning: North - Strip Gummercial, GC I South - Existing nursery, GC ;East - Exit >4ing shopping center, GC West - Vacant, GC H. General plan Designations: Project Site - General Commercial (GC) North - 'General Commercial (GC) South - General Commercial (GC) —. East - general Commercial (GC) i t West - General Commercial (GC) I. Site Characteristics: Subj4r_t site is a vacant parcel of an existing strip commercial center:' The site slopes to the south' at approximakely 3% With no significant vegetatiojt ° ITEM 8 PLANNING CDMMISSItIN STAFF REPOV DR 84•-52 < Colwell March 1985 213, Page r II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The proposed project is a drive -thru restaurant with indoor dining (26)' seats situated adjacent to an existing shopping center and landscape nursery. The site layout and proposed drive -t, #ru lane are adequate to serve the -intended use. Provisionss'' -for parking on -site consists of 13 standard spaces, 4 compacts %spaces and 1 handicapped space for a total of 18. stalls. The site is deficient three parking spaces frox;-' what is required by the, Development Code, however the developers propose to tie into the existing Woolworth Center's parking arrangement with a recorded reciproca. parking agreement (recorded December 28, 1984), which will provide additional stalls if needed. B. Design Review Committee: In regards to the original elevations' the committee ,- recommended revisions to the elevatiogf� including elimination of the awning treatment along right V'ovation, balancing the architectural projections for unifornt� , and additional use of mission the to soften the rectangular look of proposed building. Additionally, special:_ ' landscaping, 3 ft. block wall, and berming are reco ded to -: screen views of the parking stalls from public s The applicant has revised the project accordingly, as shown in Exhibits 11V` and:, "DR. C. Environmental Assessment., Part I of the Initial Study ha: been completed by the app icant. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist and has found no significant-,.. environmental impacts as a'result-of this project. Issuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order. t 0 III. FACTS I9; FINDINGS: The . project is consistent with the General Plan and Vevelopment Code. The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environmental- impacts. In addition, the proposed use, building design and site plan, together with the recommended Cohditions or Approval are in compliance with the applicable provisions, the Development Code and City, Standards. ,l? Y hANNIWCOMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 8452 - Colwell 1 March 13, 1985 o Page 3 r IY, RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission issue a Negative Declaration and approve _PR 84 -52 b adoption of the attached Resolution and Conditions of Approval. ". Rectf i submitted, ick ,Aez Aty er rig �'> RG :4F:das L ` Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit 08" - Plot Plan. /Grading Plan Exhibit -,NC" - Landscaping Plan ExhibU "D" - Elevations ((�� Exhibit "E" - Site Utilizatib" kap _ Fart II, Initial Study ' Resolution of Approval with Conditions 1 I I' %' �� V �»:..Fl a 6- . �{; : ,4 "� „ter _ .ti - .'..t•I._it., !L Ut •17 • .ij't•I; 1F R 3 S tv OP MH x LM 6 •� ( ; iz _ Ufa. r M , all GC CITE'- Off' RANCHO (]ttCA lvIC" r �1 ` TITL1:= Ao v ft PUWNING DRqSOq r 0 II -Z Mir -fg� 13 =M= =M= v f/ D `l1 I L o � � - { T � ' RlE9I CiinIT2ELe �tEI I,0.Y, �,,..,�',r b#•d! � R a.� �".� +"' ^. �� sEt rorrrrrct nvn. 7 ttrt.wi Avk. �,.. etruHe Cueuwoxoa. on - �, ��,,, :t•.er.,,i yEy e•�+a _ /J CITY OF RANCHO CUCA�ICNGA PART 11 - INITIAL STny EW"' -tON 1ENTAI. CAEL kLIST nA :. 3 --13 — - -- APPLFCAN"I': /` S t�r4lEf FILING DATE: /1� N D!/. j'„ I C�.�'^- r LOG IiU1 ER. ✓� g PROJECT: s�s�b v _r' l �siT' ;_ PROJECT x bCATiIr1T: �T'lit yt�i7°" %Or /E.>C d�f�z T.- °= .*NIRO%ZMNTAi. T_MVA "T,r (Explznat'icn of /rr4tearr "maybe?' 2? c and answers are required sh�:ersi . on attached f Soils. and Geologv. Will the proposal have YES M4iBE No significant results in: -! a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in ' geologic relationships? b. IIfsrugt3ans,. displacements, compaction or burial of the soi11:4-N �in 1 I C. ,Ch<nge topvgraphj% ,o-r,'iround surface contour ittervals? d. The destructioll, covering or modification of any unique geologic nr Physical features? e• Any` atential incsrase in wind or crater erosion of soil.,, affecting either on or off site conditons? f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition, g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards r such as earthquakes, landslides, mud— { ides, ground failure, or'similar hazards? ' v 1� Ali incYOase in the rate of h. extraction andtor Y ( use tf anytimineral resource? r r =- 2. HydrniGey. Hill the proposal have significant results in f / r' l r, page 2 YES a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction Of flotaing streams,-rivers. or eFhemeral stream channels? _ 1 " b. Changes in absorptic.t rates, drainage Patterns, or the rate and aMqunt ruhoff? of surface water, fi. Alterations to the course or flow waters? o� 'load d. Change in the .amount of, °.acs body of Water? edl e, Discharge into surface. Wafers, or any alteration of surface 7; water gilality? I f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? S• Change in the qu�antiz}� of grounduaters, eithez through direct ad4ltiots ar with -•,i drawals, or through interference with aquifer? an Quality? Quantity? s h. The reductie:_dn the amount of water other- Wise available "-'Or public water surf ies? i• Exposure of people or proper;'! to Water related hazards such as £loading or seiches? 1 "1 3. Aire, Will the proposal R ave Significant results in- a. Constant or periodic air ecissions' from mobile or indirect Sources? Stationary sources? yr_ _ b. Deteriaration of ambient air quality and /or Interference with the 1 attainment Of applicable air quality standards? c. Alteration or local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or tq porature? ; 4.. $iota i� Flora. W1114 he proposal 'hal•e significant results a. Change in the characteristics of specias, including �J ,/ Diversity, ,diWTIburion, or ,nub ez of any sp6�ties of plan_ h. Reduction of the numbers of any unique: rare or endangered species of punts? z } .,Y - Page 3 t c\\� c. Introduction of,nc.� or disruptive 4ecies of YES �rkymz �I' I! ' plants`Into an area? �Jyr^T d. 'Reduction In the potential fo ; r,icultural production? _ f Fauna. Rill the prop -tsaI II—e- significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or numbers of any species of animals? b. Reduction of the embers of any unique, rare or endangered s ' ? g ptcies o.. animals., c. Introduction of t�� or disruptive species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? _ d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or wildlife habitat? S.' Pop`lar,.ton. Will the proposal have significant. r in- a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution; density, diversity, or growth rate of the human population of area? an b,, Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 6. Socio Economic Factors. Will the proposal have. significant results in-. a. 'Change in local or regional socio-economic characteristi�-ts, including economic or comtaercial diversity, 'tax rate, and property values? l' (! f b: Will project costs be equitably distri,,uted } ✓' among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyer tax payer-,or project users? ` 7. Land. Use and Planning Considerations, Will the proposal have significant results in? a. A substantial alteration of the present or i planned land use of an area? td -, conflict with any designations, objectives, Policies, or adopted plank of any governmental entities? An Impact upon the gtNtiity an,�geantity of existing consumptive 61 non- consumptive g: recreational oppprtuni� es? f _ Page 8. YES"I.W3t Transvortation. Will the proposal have significant results in: SID _ G a. Generation Of substantial additiona3 vehicular movement? b. Effects-,on existing streets, or demand for uew sti`�et .constructit,n? / c. Effects an existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? % d. Substantial impact upon existing traosporta- Lion Systems? Y e. Alterations to present patterns ofjfcircala- tion wa/ or movement of people and /or))oods? f. Alt- &tions to or effects on presen and„ J pote•*pial water - borne, rail, mass t nsit ar air t' ffic? { &• Increases in traffi�,}hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? S. Cultural Resources. Will. the proposal haves significant results in: a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, Paleontological, and /or historical resources? -' 10. Health. Safety and Nuisance Factors- Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard' b. exposure of people to potential health hazards? c. A_risk of explosion or release n£ hazardous sub�i)�►ces in the event of an accident? a. `m= «Crease in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? e. Increase in existing noise levels? I� f. Exposure of people to pot`ent3ally dangerous .noise;: - levels? t $. The creation of objectionable'odors ?. it. An Increase in light or glare? OF Page S `\ ✓ _ r ` M Il_ Aestheti_'," I,fi l the ro i4YBL NQ f results in': P Posa1 have significant a. The obstruction Qr ^degradation of anv a Vista or view? b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site? Jz c. A conflict with the objective of designated p or potential scenic corridors? � 1 Util 2. ities and Public Services. Will the proposal have a significant need for new systems, or alterations to the following: a. Electric power% b..;Natural or packaged gas? \f c. Cotaunications _systems? d. Water supply ?' Wastewater facilities•3 `" j} 'Flood f. control structures? g.,,'Solid waste ,facilities? < n: Fire protection? i. Police protection? J • Schools? k. Parks or other recreational facilities ?' .., 1- Maintenance of public facilities, including _L roads and flood control facilities? M. Other goveramel!tal services? 13. Snerev and Scarce{tsOurce$, Will the proposal, have significant results im a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? f b. Substantial increase in demiand upon existing �y sources of energy? C. An incxaase in the demand for development of new sources of energy? d. An increase Or perpetuation of the consumption of renewable ' _pon- forms Of energy, VFren feasible renewable sources of energy are available? ,a, \,.. Page -6 rh YES MAYBE NO e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or scarce natural 'resource? 14, Mdndstory Findings of Significance, a Does the project have the potential to de ` ytade the quality ox�the environment, substantially reduce the habzilat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below 'self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of -California history or prehistoT7? 1% b, Does the PY-�t have the potential to achieve` short -term, to the disadvantage of 10118-term, environmental goals? - (A short -term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long- term impacts will endure well into the future). c. Does the project have impacts which are 6' individually limited, but cumulatively - considerable? (Cumulatively considerable means that the incremental effects of an ' individual project are considerable then viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,` and probable future projects). d. Does the project have environmental effects _ which will, cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? II. DISCII5SIdId OF ENL*Ig021*iE gAT, EVALUATION (i.e., of affirmative answeas -.ta the above questions plus a discussion ox` proposed mitigation measures), <; 4 n Al Page 7 On the basis of this initial evaluation: r x find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DEC L iTIOY will be prepared. ' I find that although the proposed project could Kaye s significant effect an the environment, the 1i-- -1f Vill not he a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the DECLARATION WILL BZ PREPARED. Project. A NEGATIVE I find the proposed project MAY have a significant affect cn the L . J envirtsment, and an ENVI�20:J = I.�ipACT REPORT is required, Date-_ � Signature ;v j� ` ;, - •� Title. I i i i i 1 a i i fi :. RESOLUTION Nn. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMEN'' REVIEW NO, 84 -52 LOCATED Cr? SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ;HELMS AND FOOTHILL IN THE GENERC - COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 28ta day ot; November, 1984, a complete application was filed by Eva Sloan for review of the above - described project�,,and WHEREAS, , on the 13th E(3J�jti of March, 1985, the Rat�ch�ucamonga Planning held a meetingA�t,1 consider the above- dlescribed p ject. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Lu��amonga Planning Commissi7 �-resolved as follows: r, / SECTION lc That th following can be met: Toth the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and - ' 2. That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of th�,4 bevel opment Code and °the purposes ` of the districv ;` iri whiS�5 the site is locate04 and / 3. That the proposed use is in compliance w h each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code °, and 4. That the proposed use, together with tl,g conditions applicable thereto, Mill not be detri4niaf 'o the d public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the v1kinity. SECTIt u�2: That this projeck will not create adverse impacts on tie — environment and that a Negative Declarion is issued on March 13, 1985. SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 84 -52 is approveC=, ubject to the following conditions and attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION: y 1. Provide reciprocal parking and access agreement ". o 2. The landscape `planter which will be removed on the Woolworth's property shill be replaced in kind just north_ of the proposed drive aisle. Res aIutiyir No.~ L DR �I. 51 - Colwell Page 2 3. Provide special landscaping treatment along the Helms Avenue and Foothill .Boulevard frontages. A low 3 -foot profile wall along the west property line -shall be provided to help screen the parked cars with bermng and mounding adjacent to it. 4. A 5-foot landscape planter shall be provided along the south property line adjacent to the nursery. ENGINE�kI% DIVISION: c, 1. The proposed drive a ach on Helms Avenue shall confirm to City Commercial Standa`J No. 305. APPROV,D AND ADOPTED THIS 13th D ' OF MARCH, 1985. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCFEO UCAMONGA BY: Denni;s L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST. • Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary, of the Planning CommissfJon of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,, at a regular meeting of the Planni� Commission herd on the 13th day ofiMarch, 1985, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS:° NOES: COMMISSIONERo- '• ABSENT: COMMISSIO(�RS: - - 17 °~ 1\\ �. YY .V V OCLV^ LTN, Lgl y.y LSO ^�\ \ Aa C� •Y . AA ro C D YCxiL OVpp 9 Yy.e C:CGC (, AA.H. �5... r° G N 6 O!�! A rn 0 L �6! 0 G y M ro i L O L �! y "A•1 Z •� Lu V V A0.y'L LTlP .y K3 D °�9.Y0.3yOq M tlpa roro A.� .. 6�Yq V' _ AGY'�Y A LfL y V Ap lC,v a- Vi.mE Croy O 0uW pm +i: q`q �p Ld W a.- i A Ni! 4 M l! $ .._• n E�OYU i1 O Y` 6 U G s R Ei T . Y °E=.ro M a� C A ®N A LOS �" - N+EEy it Q. YC'LG COY C C1 L L AYCaO YTS L p�a ro* �}� Op.af YrY'�LMU C"CR_ YCNQY. Z. ID U Ql� a a- > C� \ O M a t O SAe� 41.21. Y p d Y „ n YOG�+ ro ^9i"aa.a�g U AcsL.�ulN yylµ y� °1rai p�yro �tYl gaw _ ° Gyy- Yc VE6V1 L° ELOOCAC. AL "� y a- Ga�� °V p ^y E n p ..rO fI�Y AY�uY A K 1 L ^N ^g ~� da �.= 01 •^4Ad ro Y.4 YT0. 2r A =�N YpaN .�AGa C Cm Y e :z R:ui� a X60 ro A�E!A" .V U.NOS )1� `-Z CTn`� e--.k dcMM ro Eyd uN^ n tlr pi Lr^.. yv.L = Y �Y QA.Yyy dLr n '"' E p IN. 0y =G.... � M �i pp .� LM4„ qs °G 3,C3 A�N A 0.naVV L O.^ Y L if �� OW.9Vp y q---] CC yVy' �aN'O� • 3YV� =GCYLanr� ccpqg�.v n�06Ca NC O =q'V�Y OC�� , LO YGwiG_ VSAYE Y 4 OyC 9O L.w.YNL42N.} y VW 6N� CCp YoA N 6 ��St MECNY OY� Yro =5 pp p Y O - j.. �403� �H«. <. .Nnpy# i a.L OLS K A aL 6 V 44 \ O{Slyv1,. 11 J •y ,gym. �j) 4 .e ) J 0 L tV� EV T tat y Y N uuC q^!. ,�;�;1 M d s • a a a .c y � n. � G. c. ,ril V tJ ^ C O J n�yC iY W N is X69 Oat =Ot UN 0.p � s o s Y:G i lair ;43 st p QQ} 4 G � i• '= N 4•S. 4ppp. � p+ p! O'= KCM "M �^ `,\ '. yf E x= sO�I ;MLO..NNr,f 1 v oa.�. u. < YR aQ�egCeg�� YYi`�C•tliy ^CTb Gro Y } G�ti °^ 6<lp sb ^t 1Q1t G RM_'Z-0 �rbitt qa tl.aS w.. q>r 1 awn Et O,. a pleaYa 0ugg 4.V ad 2 Y9 w.s.. rgNb i',u a°eV YOSUQ fgZEI LN4 '✓ @a ^y M4y�6 �'� �y.�4Cjp6 Gq~Y � O.t 1r't<> '�TpN @�� Y+�„d,,. A ��° L�@. tw yr+• Ql O =uP QY <tla�a`R �4TY.0 ANN Y. r<e 4- `tlr u Li O Sa < -b r �" A w ly i y u V N .sir x.Yy r Z C QA� Y L +.`- ,Q '�' b. < �'" � ..,# L @ s °� -4 a.!: 2 , o. Ytq R!V tl,�` pY gaQOy`9 Z£Gyy OLGG<C <4 CL Q '�rtw }!G 0�� +OV SNP G'� � Ct �`ti C.1r bnfN >Yar tl GY a'd3MaN.c M AL d. § �W =� ^M. in; N. OIw Y:caeq �+cNro+<"Hau.'q a� wagg c''+ »u �^ 2-9du m oia Z° .°,, rsn4w 4@ O 6 C <. 4SJ q+N-@a m aw.� .'G+ n'" E!y'Y' *e : ^Q C ta. 4= C-0 YL t<°b S tl NRW Cy ZCb�.ti VCM •n ro Yv ~p�'Zgg O.tl a Y� b ! T7Z5 G #ui'6 Sir yi Ta 9 �OA rN ^q NG @v + us« u^ t u yu Q,g a— .$ mW."S4 �° �. eq _ « d:a -w.ca: a N�N4 ^V �Ci. ii ty,lb ^� V")N �Y --5 �i bi1Y m+i DM.a ir'+fa[Nt �{•• �Cq�a O ^K�pp� b3.1 s ^oLY °�tl m4r °. ux °.,t@Gua uu VM i 43.0 o .~^ �iaQ•> �'� s;Ry o+;�cn y.... < Yt wK.V..wL @. ZN G °��. -yp +E CILwi 000 Vb L CG i!.uO 37Y • MV y.C- -. pp pp Np NH 4k xN1aV q. O. pp Saw �CaCi - aa+w -G @C�w Wes. Lr w�.. ^V� M K v 6�w� v °^ 6<lp sb ^t 1Q1t G RM_'Z-0 �rbitt qa tl.aS w.. q>r 1 awn Et O,. a pleaYa 0ugg 4.V ad 2 Y9 w.s.. '4omQ1. 4 .°� ° ti"Yy N E- wN v, Nw �n�4'- My G AVXC:Q y4Ypp4X � SS �y.�4Cjp6 Qu«@Y.. O.^ tiYOtl i`�V Sim M� `�' _. °tl aR�CV 4ir GNP Ci.' 60 EL �. L@ M3 OC° O �b wn+_Y Ms°r pp.6 FAyY �Ta 6t�Yi tlX v qQ� W4Q Ytq R!V tl,�` pY gaQOy`9 Z£Gyy OLGG<C <4 CL Q '�rtw }!G 0�� +OV SNP G'� � Ct �`ti C.1r bnfN >Yar tl GY a'd3MaN.c M r O% tlwN ^ °q N i(VZS Ab aC N. OIw G�qi a y fir. NNVp 4@ O 6 C <. 4SJ cep Qr- hM n sw@a+ w V Vvb^Y,is <, yY1. ..iN�Ct Ri ^Q C ta. 4= C-0 YL t<°b S tl NRW Cy ZCb�.ti VCM •n ro Yv ~p�'Zgg O.tl a Y� b ! T7Z5 G #ui'6 Sir yi Ta 9 �OA y�R C' VO�YT E +itlb c a ;R79 MD� Vie' �a cv> tiOwN Vt°.gyw�.. R< �Ca.M9C YyRQ�; ti'x �wyi Utz ° ^VA N�N4 ^V �Ci. ii ty,lb ^� V")N �Y --5 �i bi1Y m+i DM.a ir'+fa[Nt �{•• �Cq�a O ^K�pp� v YG III II / a M r yq Y 70 .L. w��9 � ��•� YCA Qp'q OpaGfln 6J�mY �m r G i G ✓ °G G „ 3 O y.iV ✓✓F y � �f. ter `'p„mV oai ya �w +` dam gNC kaG dMV mo ®�da qmu. ��' t, ao� ✓. cim T is �� P <3. a p� � FN . G ✓7. � y J. a q � Q. N "J a iJ � �,. �' 6� N � Y.yJa, p. Ip � C d ` t ��M `m gF600 ✓ 7dd� I °L�3 s O ¢OV 7#�JJJ Y ✓Q✓ ✓`.ON NO TG JV a ��i� rr'pi ✓ ° GAd yN ~y ✓*YQ 'T yi tJ` +u NOG da y �dyd NQ�i .p 7 y iJfN -yiN GD V„f'�nC> G. Ji'r'� ° r''i ".i Zs'C�G E d Q �idA y,O<?•C� .. pG I�NgY''s V6SI� o`er. TO Oy JVd s°4 G a'� 6 ✓�'' Yd.xc _+ c /. ?UY+.. Q} y ONi6 ¢ .Y✓t' O p. ✓mGa d,�R�AO':' �i�Jmti OA ,O y �t� q J a oN w6 ✓�P'C Nii�y gf Q_Nd dpfl�� . i J,�� N. �d�PFfO aG O m9 G�7 +! iGGY ,VGG3 A,'. A G o CCG ice✓ Q OA ¢v TGJ�,,yy<G r,• �D.,O..A "yiU �: 9'N i M. °i Vs t} wTp a<Ot < 2'V pJE sr p.00' iN pi �Q �� d .6�, b F� ♦ '% FJ p. ll N�poo G�O,po vy ✓p 0 7 � /°' NVY ✓Qp Ti NCfO real p~.. N YA I °S' N p gNC6 4.— —1D . Y L./ ON L N L�pyF eV AGVG JJN JGi I ✓ Vi,� a"� �` < N �^! 'yV r060V 6ji� RG a V 4 a;.r ✓ l r m O�COOr ygc�vi p 'O p�O OV iA; ✓W �YM1 k i d✓y✓ ba 3Y� MF « ? ✓y° w�Nfy � `h � i l N N J e Ns 4 MO LLinpA ` G Gi Q y yp y0' f e7L a s i1 p V.'ST ~C �rn i0 NT �> y$ � vo,.e°.o- ��. �'."g�li ✓r,Gr. r}`��,e '`., � c °vim` y�.. ✓ �. % �,°y ✓ ' r'Y✓a'./i It N' ✓.O ✓G r- TA, :l . q $ <poi vc 'n �y iN% i dp' yT'�Q� <.�k dD,�PN �� O'Q . �p NL �P ✓� pYp. G ✓pj bId a - p ��aqC �iY >G1y ?N. �J �Y„G yC +q f� i9 K SP N ~64 l t6'a y : A a.{.s 6� Y'NO• ✓�✓ •'�� Yom.*., ♦ tO yitl N iG m = Y c V =ew`d _ y.. ya �yG .O `tea ' ✓yN. �Ai �6 Ne .eby.p mm�i ✓r GF'N i. t J Fa Sr, ` 3 yL�{ Yx G ya�� NOS ✓�Y L`aO . rN Jp �N� M g �� i�,^[3L 6� ��.a d ✓.� c LN �✓ y. `4yra m4 dr'> £�.� p �s Lu+G' N.d iA.Q.r I qFi°� C q✓� a0 pw wn iA;o aa� v ° piA l ov MJ y. NBC p' �• i° �d3'd io aye.Jey� LN "! N�<'V y0�d` tN L ✓� zt a O SmdN O� ii? ✓G yr ✓�j. '?` 4. M.1 qY i.. �. t �..rw d�Ni y� '$rr <�.� � +.. � o = °�✓ P�m�Y-a`.°+ >Q�a'z � �''.a`,v BN'm''a s:n �+ r ✓ V FAG. A p✓ aYs a� O �� ✓J-�~ MM�GN �yli �t Adrw. T oY y`✓N.s .. O I's O.Oi Y �V Y.,• q M y I�ID Ii�o1Y V ii C'`f Cy > a r lM R 1k tliF o V% U Win% -' ECU, _° +NbdO d °N+yY A�r, L Y Y G:LVy le.4 i w i Gt�.YQ ^yOid �b Tq b• q. CQ 4."C' =- �p2 A s, A ... V`C9 a4 «. pp _..cd q' } 'a ` � w.9 'o. °' aa..«u ,'N Ea °:s sbun :o m. ar "..1 iqa °C G�C4 Lid - Nq�d b +2+ _ 4 ::=C, VYZ- v p Q d i q � � Oocd �' �v T3 9 C Ltao GLO,A yyHv +. d NW �J q�a�b w3 Cdam•" Z t � q Cl U A.. _..r S�VC Cq«401 V.LgN � -.5 N V G U a°; uE °C Vrq� CO Uiya� OIL a�bN°C Sbr � EwY 96 y�.K:W q Y C :N C+ q Irt.O Vti �i2✓Idd .-. .c 4.38 4U IYQN LQ„ NB m WL Y� N, i er1CO N b 3Cir M 4 JL G £� do Qlyn qo fT 1 V°C +ws Dv f. L° -OC TL d Yp TI. AIO °n C r Q.p bC a OAO b G w •S` 1C, t0 6C. CaCy �a W ri63 Ufj6 Ay F Nv�a Lp2 OC 7.+°4M1tC..Y+ Yp No y «i Ob b. £qq� Va+yN bT LVTT wq q E �y GC L�"p pp '_ a ' w -' s7 � � °-"'- ° m m ,ems s3 qy e1 otY io V +Va@ r Gqb UyM `nV N.: OQOC qv g_ y�ZyZ RG � 7 ANN Vm A 6 Y S AQ." 4 a Ypl YQ GCEk 1�. 4 C q .UVOf 9bi V`N •in L puf. y S .� F K 4 O 4✓ f�.l V °� 6QG, v rr Gq Yi- ° v V'► d v b 6a Y Cf 4'I i a t % �j .A� C cN ci. '''\\ (J r C. V V sN y�v =x 8 a.� ... s• ;. r9N v� qG u 3 ��. pppppp q. .�O.na a °vco F L fy 4�a K x It. d ,✓ Ur • e.-- > A.. q.� V 4 cy° q. Yyb ..n ETiY' V. Q6... �! C cn coq' e 'c Zm7qa s a3. Ey «° orn Ni q'^b dx �`- Y 4 Qy� b Nw OKL r•�d� V� .LIIi ii�0 iG LY S%` tt �. L' T'dAq YN'. '��.MSy CCom C yViLY. �'4LQ „LSD') -z2 DY yy`F UQ'Y. L V d £r V NS VOYY MNy yLK ti Kv HA A 4wL Ayq X %�►.Lr. w Cy LLt4N°p3 tlt N4N, q 'TW 4w� .iNp ]: HF \` \ \. z(- „4. a �..°• �a�..'. .. cam'°' ,q,c�, y z c u � {JJ] �'" KQ a A gCCOU C VF�ama w .a�i a{ �v. beG ;2 .Q. �+ qw. q q LLE tan .W. a X! E DO v aV Qa 8SNY.0. W� ^. .z. VV44ts] Gr' Y U O Caa :. Yw Lb.S:. . a� i24 N u.4�aa L4tlw�f: LJAY -�4 tw ..:• W CTj w� 9 �O .O4i qaw iC _ F.- = c�u p � N ..�., �� •- � roams.. �� -gg+ qmv-a v o y-a w 9 ,+•co�� tlaaW e+. . � ,.,,L CON ~Y. .7A e+me+ �� erH E'� y'R evoN �L 4f1'6.Y tl ~Ati� e�'�vERC 4 w ^mca� �Y�•`q i2�� t�t''Va• �G gVgC �C. Y4Q. U} dw RN q.. uQ L..,Qi ie ••G �4�C•4.. b ♦aA�E QC'Q aaq r ZA .° Bevy ^�, .�a..y t4 y.W ~� V. N.+�+.. 0.6 U .�� QW tom••. ey4 ,s,,. a °�. a°•+i uo''s�� hmi '.`' '"" mY Gov-o �-� ' i M h m. out�..tz ��. A if, o meamrn �yrov o. c +.. N:� ''a Tu us ao.m.s a°• 4apna'av'NUi. tt.^A ° °+:: a• a G ;a v a'd "cc„•' uo °'� .�=.c •' ti me c�.Y..'c. �'° tx °eir'H V"i N N MC. CA 5r Q V b�uad b oO�E w �OS� -sE eii�U. wL u0 M. A UU�� M 13y> ti'Ca .• bCy 3 O >e`t�^' laY mVle Tyr . . �C 'b: .°- w �� NtFA V at' vc. K�N r y a J y vex VL �GZ'1 A 9 Q� b ,agi ` ; GO " �� dG rn=' A N VCC 11 �Yw Ly LaC G G t ajt D. B V ZEI; V„ V W CI 9a. Q-O V+ a U sa ai CC aQrOVw .A.e 0.aQfx °Vm '^"4 s t.+rRl.} �' 4 Q /'�LCJ:t Uu vwi. 'CSN� q. •�Cp Eiu aQ �C 4G Yi 4t .0.'A tlC0 LY L 4+ p V.•. K�ro % Z w �� Nn _ •u t= w w m 4Q�� 'wi U k•-r R as G 4 U KV a'-Q Ca w4 4 O< $ w :.oU QLW bO.a am dq NV Y.® tar Ap 4� �W (ti�i uiK - RO °ps 'Fcw" ..wa 4-G Ea oo. �v-ei �%r'�a cui; u•C.- Y T ♦'°. ° •.,ta - a c dL L "" -a'Yi 'x 3apC� +. MF -`u+' .. , d4. sfc u.. +..N pu37. Wu66 dv1 o. .4 i _"- u¢>a t"$a� am..N Car Oaa urn gENiMtl �M C0. 4 CS V U � w U t . ,...,w. LYUO �4 ae>L #.q V+a y t�1ei ^'Lys 1=•K 4 t � � � � 4r� �q � L 4 RW SLY4.N R: F+Aq . f W fl LS Ql x'p CL ri t F ... � •e5 c � ��La. ox ..� ro it a�a c d C L uN r '�N+..a b �`�f J. ! ".s L IX y•� $ O a ° N a � •nCO, •p da�vu LN•u G.AdC a _ C� .Q � Y t Dd N U�•� N. ° U QI q g15 S: G ea'. YJCxV Qian C pd •p N i' 40a �Y pANp war MC. 4Y�•� o. �^•_ m a m z.a' A u VL � °.. y �� N G.• Y ►rfrw d ,C c dY@ tip A@ � aL �Y C G N T N 6� 3G 4.y S'9 `4 ¢ter V 21. S a. wy a c r tg, E 4 Wa�LI. L L Cr a«LiN sp C6 Q � &Cp i d' �.r i° EE �Gj u &,nR 3� N,MV Na ca tea., ap}S Cy v •yr a' a � aetb�e c�xe °'� vM sPyyo N L$ °am.��s � Y d mL ��4 A M T N b,G.L - 4 q•n a^ aN N3F. N L 1T L.S dy NN d«i V� � ... NN =vdiL H ,�8 Q fir. a4LLd LGY �y COw V�5 =2n 6'p oc .p ma. Yz W0.L � ao y. n3 d ^. 6� iC Y+^: C•n °Yr le b -79 to .R.i YE. @yn �N a�..• L P' Ey ab. O.L ¢ V �. Gm 46 yY F. 1 t°iAmi� iGL S ewe iC .°. T1,21w ••.a.T. G G N b.c aG.r oxoN a'L�taaSG : � �c GM' @N PO yf yCVC M. +w ...:� 4 C•Nvr°i gO�L r� L�gaG� � ?. H4 d m`�R- zicN `w Lu. dE 9a N a�oa ° qN 50 V. E a� °$ w.r yam Is 15 b Nona 3�b D1. 'q >C d>O pa. i.4 �$• -*�� gypp,, A :- avc 4 •O G.-L p.Qa LAC".9# '.Z`y�u »4 N N �x Ll d 4 piw q WCi.rN.G Nt�iY LG`I LO>4 a4 U.`•°•�.. r..0 d0 i O V mYY•°n @.+ 4t�R.�.�W �� y. ai N u4s v. N.S.a1Y p ��•. tr.. p 6.N. V� d T � A.Oi9Y Ydwaa� VLAq R4Y .Qp iC. @� IL-.o Fu°. dyN «, rtx�°ury"_ '� KN.L' . °dam E Ad rt4 Mu. pp R N a.i..p.2 Py� RM Q° wp Qr to }V h Y °REd G dH.G.y b n r �A~FL 2s pG� G.4�.� •p^ CLtJ �•° F pIN Eb d O^NNN b Gx�ror a d a i v n4i L�� La d.S MTJ Vim L N R +ZSM1?Y L N4C'^.° =L�° 9YY G "y Tx D1O �L Rlb D� Ca' °Y �O"hyr .q p1ON @�E 09... Joy C L @n6 SiJ ..d. p,.0 G 'a'Y.du,as LCUG 6 °aa..°L.i Aa ��. vC„rN ° Nt0 iii rnN a " Lna.d 3 Lyi r N"�¢: >a L..�t� <. oc °i O.N dN VI G ¢44�t -0 c �y L w N 4 U C d V t ✓v I � � �E W 0 4� q� 4 r C VW - Go W t- W� N,J CaC� G4 �f /yy` � G MV •� ° V c z U C6 �b c VV dA N1Yn ..c. U OrCLi ybViq•.< Fd. W N �f a`N G N 4 t'O P „} � ' 4d .IIIL A. �- N. �) _y cios . ACw :o ++.f . Nc ..Grn.W E. q c C LAS <�OGY _Z �� N �U LT tx4 p o Gr• Y u . A v a4VipLC G m a q g u S G °v E dNV lvriaW.cak 4 tt. r. +� voio."c. w. va!v. m - yc U10 wfyi. q. Ud 4 r U CT 4Ly d d « LW c Zia a w N _ N c a ♦- .bc. -a c b y` �6Y bw Uub. tnb. -0 OL dyl, d Na. Y♦ L s » a nb $F(Laµ W ig gOtN. ; GN �d W. < <•{LC 8G: Q. pY 1�Y G rC yn bVOV.O QV°L- tG n° b O-0 LV Yq ,. �'. rL� °Utl Ey 6 G, Z dMy� �5 GAU Cy�W„ yy �V. Q �•Z-' Lt yNy y-0y ad. O9 "' -� ny 4 .;^ In L My O R'L E as d� _ .:. rn j 3 gN gz.2 F M no db i'.L C4 ` V om �.� r Oy aPir '' n rid "+ cc 1 ,� d u b. ZA _� c z^ a` Cw O za cv UAL n. '` LM ba .n., a Ym Gn b. < V b .bNC q♦. .. 2. yG W aa •m 4 4d.0 »CY n d r 4 V V--- OPY 4,G,yt GA.,� WaLi -0 c �y L w N 4 U C d V t ✓v I � � �E W 0 4� q� 4 r C VW - Go W t- W� N,J CaC� G4 �f /yy` � G MV qJ Vl x /� wW z U C6 �b c VV dA N1Yn ..c. U OrCLi ybViq•.< Fd. W N �f L L; 6µO eANb 3.. R. 4 .O � t wNC aY Up.r q V dTEN 9q Z � OCR wbG m � G MV wW z dA N1Yn ..c. U OrCLi ybViq•.< V Ld V�Y �f L L; 6µO eANb 3.. R. 4 .O N t wNC aY Up.r dTEN 9q _y cios . ACw :o A��c ws . Nc ..Grn.W E. q c C LAS <�OGY _Z �� N �U LT tx4 p < na U y V L L < N ^ S a« < O o r+ < � .b ntl CN�EY. U b m n b u.. C AL a4VipLC G m a q g u 20 G °v E dNV lvriaW.cak 4 tt. r. +� voio."c. w. va!v. m v++ e ° 00 TEr NU 6S � % VAN _ • l '_i Y v V h ^d wa ^c 6Jtiy V ^ 1: Adh 5 m d y �%s U V N L Y N gm � ,32 M .L qq b uN b y{q. t H s. OIy�2 tl ^ N Ca ,O N ^ U y v .y�.....r- e W °'.0 u •-_ ,. s. �. m w-. ^emu'. +' "�. a u.- ,-o yu aG Y ^v N •.. C y g � (7 J.UV y L t L TY L d ^L G N d. w yR HU W 4 QU �QE Q G.rO.y O eTi � Y C Nbt S 4 H� CL4 OR uy > t Jy E fOwY A w SC C 4 ti N C qb b qN L A U tt �" b♦ O. ly !) 6 ra 4 b N G G y >r y NM I.� �ur.. 4v d k'� .Civs i6•i » 0¢ �.r�.y 4Ca.. _ tii 6d . 4•.• N W A 4'b .l U DATE: March 13, 1985 TO: ChaJrman and Members of the-,*,Ianning Commisslon,' �1 FROM: Rion Gomez, City Planner BY Jo�art Meyer, Assistant Planner, \� SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85 -03 - CHRISTIAN FAMILY FELLO'WSKIP A proposal to operate a church within a 1650 square foot space located witi;in an industrial park at the east side of Archibald, south of 6th Street. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTI1ON: A. Action Requested *. Approval of a Conditional Use Permit for a church use.' B. Puruose: Provide temporary ` church faci -I,ities for the applicant`s congregation. C. Location: 9375 Archibald Avenue, Suite 603 D. Parcel Size: 5 a ^,res E. Existing_Zoninu; General Industrial F. Existinq Land Use: Multi - tenant Industrial_ (Archicenter) G. Surrounding Land Use and Zonin e North-- Qneral Industriai Subarea 4)� South , General Industrial (Subarea n East - Vacant, General Industri(Subarea 4) Nest General Industrial (Suba "ea Q1Industrial Park (Subarea 16 ) '1 H. General Plan Desi na�tions�: project Site - deneral Ind•strial North - General Industria`i, South - General Industriay� East - General Industrial West General Industri,Al /Industrial Park k�NNING COMMISSIOI- STAFF REPORT., CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85 -03 /CHRISTIAN FAMILY PELL014SHIP - !March 13, 1985 ('age 2 f I. Site Characteristic?:: The proposed use is. locate&�yithin a (? single unit in a multi - building,, multi- tenant Adustrial complex center; (Archicenter, see Exhibit "B "). The center ' consists of eight (8) detached multi, tenant buildings. rue entire site parking availability is approximately 175 spaces, II. ANALYSIS. A. Background: in September of 1983, the Planning cjnission approved the estab isfrk t of a Moose Lodge in', the easternmost unit of buildingtber 600 (Exhibit "8"). The Commission limited this use td-40 parkingg= paces' and required an automatic � review of the application, in two years (September 1985). 0n February 27, 1985, thcr' Planning Commission approved the establishment of the things of Spirit Church. Tfa required parking was estimated at 32. This also will be revi6red at the end of tw¢ years. B. General: The proposed us, to be located in the mid- _ section of building number 600 (Exhibit "B "). The major issue related to insritutionai uses 'located within industrial areas is compatibility with surrounding tenants in terms of parking availability. The ,parking area for building 600 is ft -ectly north of:the building. There are twenty -six available parking J"'; spaces to be snared by the four units in building 600 and the .. four units in building 700. Existing tenants currently in this complex have traditional daytime hours of operation. The Moose Lodge has evening hours and holds breakfasts on Sunday mornings. The Wings-,of Spirit Church primarily has operating hours on Sunday mornings. Thirty -seven parking 'spaces are requirel for this church. Together, all., three uses require approximately 110 parking'' spaces. The narking areas between building 500, and 400 and additional spr-: south of building 400 would logically accommodate parking for the Wings of Spirit Church. Therefore, any possible conflict in parking would come from the Moose Lodge and the proposed c`_urch. However, utilizing the 26 spaces between Building 600 and 700 and additional areas west of Building 600 and north of Building 700, it is estimated that there are 83 spaces within, 300 feet of both uses. On this basis there appear to be minimal conflicts.., In tenerai, - institutional uses within industrrial buildings are permitted for a limited period of time, typically two years. In addition, most institutions utilize these structures onl-, on a_ temporary basis, pending relocation to a permanent "site. Lastly, previously approved institctione'� uses have looted �in industrial park areas which, are requirdl Ao provjide a'-higher parking ratio, thus reducing the risk paused by Overlapping `= activities. tv PL�,V6� COMISSION STAFF REPORT _% C rNOITIONAL USE PERMIT 8H- 03jCHRISTIAN r=ANILY FELLOWSHIP arch I3, 1985 Page 3 C. Environmental Assessment: Tfy4 r osed p op project has been „ determined t(s be a 'categarica=r exemption- , (California � Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, Section I Ol, -Class I), cj in which* it will not have a significant Iffect on the ?, environment which 'shall, therefore, 5e ,ex t from the provisions of CEQA. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGSS: The prop" protect is consistsjnt whir. the Industrial Specific Plan. The - proposed asa, toget -or with the ` recommended conditions of "royal, will not be detrimental to the public health or materially njurious to vicinity.' properties in the "M CORRESPONDENCE: ThisViterrt has been advertised as a public hearing in The Daily Report newspaper, the proper'ty posted, and notices were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. To, date, no,coxrespondence has been received either or or against this project. V. RECOMMENDATION_' Staff recommends that the Planning C< ssion approve Conditional' Use ,Permit 85 -03 through adoption of the attached Resolution wit'r Conditions. s S Re eci ibmitted, Ck eZ ity er Attachments: Exhibit °A° - Vicinity. Map I Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit,AC' _ Floor Plan Resolr ,rt of rproyalf )) ;4~ .. / - t �. f ` PJ - -- ---" i TK Q� /.it4CL eaP aos.p.ty 5 3a.0 1 `r/jPrx 1 • z70.i[' „Or Z l =SaK BERNARWN(l � s i Y Ara t ,� _ l R�OR.T-f CITY RANCHO CUCA-MONGA ITEM PLjiI� \'G I-DIVISIaN 'I'ITI.S- ExHII3IT- l • t:+R.Oj�oSED CNU2C!{ •' `�, t : �`,i � 1 t ! ' I . III IM. 1 i '• fir¢ U, .+ bOD� ~• MOCK, Ap t r , ' ... c'� s i • � r �� i +.vtn�t5 � S'!ea is � c r - [ i. �`•[ }� may..^ �+.�.J •• , J r ii �l � �{ . X77 $ •�i .�' � •�t.. L �`�^{�� ' }•♦ j � � /: "};-•L•„• .-«:i ya• �, 1� �. "'`� I � } I i•I rid a TH CITY OF, �.t��TCHQ. Tr` I iTG%t: C-L�E� - l.i�� S TITLE =_ l-rE, t3L�,.� R k` G DA S - E.HIIItT - „” �'} SGtI E: I�� SCA t,Lr: '9Fpm trpR YROFpsEp �NTfRioR AL76RA7faNS t.' tCA4E. t %e=1'*4 Jso -170 SSAT.f CD 0 i - t l •NVAs£gY � ,,t, _ C� NMTH CITY OF ITrum. cup RANCHO CUCAMOiNGA,' TITLE. 'PLA10 PLANNING DIVISiiYN L"XI-IIBIT- v�`� SCALE -_ 1JT RE.r')LUTION NO. A RE057%O 'ION OF THE RANCHO CUCALdGIGA PLANNING COML�iISSIOF, APPROih NG CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 85 -03 FOR OF A CHURCH: LOCATED 9375 ARCHIBALD AVENUE, #603, IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRTAL DISTRICT i WHEREAS, an the 30th day of January, 2935 a Complete application was filed by Forrest Hindly for review of the abode- described project, aadd. _ f WHERE=AS, an the 13th day of March, 1985, the Rancho = 'Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described project. ' NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga.,Planning Commission resolves as follows: SECTIt!gk That the following findings can be met: 1. That+the proposed use j,.in accord with the General ,I Flan, the objectives vll the Industrial Specific. Plan, and the purposes of the district in wMch the site is located. 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties ,or improvements in the vicin 3. That the proposed use cpraplles with each of the applicable provisions of�. -the Industrial Specific Plan. SECTION 2: That. Conditional Use Permit No. 85 -03 is approved subject to the fc owing conditions: 1. This use shall be permitted at this .location for three (3) years from the date of approval. Furthk';` the operation oir! this Conditional Use Permit shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission in two years. 2. Approval shall expire, unless extend--d by the " ;Manning Commission, if the approved use has not commenced within twenty-four (24) months from the date of approval. Resollution'No. ! T CUP 85 -03 Page 2 ` ,V, 3. The site shall be developed in 'accordance with the approved site . plans. on file in the Planning Division, the conditions "contained herein. r.` and Industrial Area Specific Plan regulations. PH& to any 'use of`� the project �- fie or business activity being commenced thereon, al; conditions. of approval shall be completed tq }he satisfaction of the City Planner. 4. Apprqyal of this request s�, All not vi ,+ compliance i with all sections of thendustriai Arta Specific ` Plan, , all other applicable City, ilyd&,k#nces, and applicable tobmnuniiy" plans ar specific plans in affect at the, time r occupancy.' 5. Any signs propose jt+r this.Cnnditional Use Permit shall be designed in conformarice.� with the CompreWe ive Sign Ordinance and shall require ., review and approval by the Plann 6g Division error to installation of such signs. 6. If the operation ,b this church cau r �Oneffects upon acent businessesor oper�'j s, the Cond.P .10al Use Permit shat l be r;brought before she Planning Commission for their consideration and possible termination of =such use, i. Pubiic -assembly or large group meetings shall not commend- until such time as at} Uniform Building Code and Title 19 -of ;fie State Fire Marshall's Regulations have been complied' kith. f:*ior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Foothill .Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety -° Division to `show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to- occupancy. B. The building may be used for religious assembly and group meetings only during A-he weekend and ;after 6:00 p.m. on weeknights. o 9. Preschocls or schools are not allowed by tMs Permit; liv, giver, this shall not preclude nurspries or Sunday r f , - (! Resolution No. CUP 85 -03 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13th DAY OF MARCH, 1985, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE 04TY OFI�ANCHO C& AMONGA Dennis L. Stout, Chairman` p'`y ATTEST• yJ `Deputy, - Rick Gomez, Secratary & -1, Mick Goi;iez Deputy Secretary' --of the ;eiannfna Commission of the day 0 Rancho Cucammtga, do 5ereby.certify that 'il foregaing _Resolution was duly and j '1 ' regularly introduced, passed, and adopWd -,by t6d Plan jng- Commission of the I City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting at the Planning Commission geld on the 13th day of March, 1985 by the following vote -td -spit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: - NOES: COMMIZIONERS: ` I ABSENT ` : L'OMMISSIONERS: `H CITY OF RANCHO GUCAMONGA ( z A~ ` © 1 k DATE: March 13, 1985 V77 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Con"Oss ion rt 1k' FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY; Dan Coleman, S��;iar PlannRr, )=% SUBJECT: EMVTRONMENTALY ASSESSMENT' AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84=12 - DVIS - Th^ e dev�npinent of 2 apartment on 7.,9 acres of and in the LV,) Medium (4 -8 du/ac) and Medium' (8 -14 '1 - Vu /ac) Residentiar district, located at the northeast j corner. of Arrow Highway, and Etiwaitda Avenue"- APN 229- 041, - _ 11. t� I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTIONS k Action Requested: ° Approval of site p`Ean, e:ova,ions and issuance of a. Negative declaration. B. Purpose Development of 328 apartments. C. Location Northeast corner of Arrow Highway and 'Etiwanda Avenue Exhil:it "A "). d. Parcel Size: 27.79 acres. E. Existing Zoning: Low Medium and Medium Residential.s, �r f. Existing Land Use: Vacant; _ G. Project Density:. 12.8 du /ac. H. Surroundin 'Land Use -Dand Zonin North - ingle family residential; Low Residential South - Vacant;. General Industrial (Subarea 8) East' Etiwanda Creek; 'Low Medium Residential West - Vacant; General Industrial (Subarea 8) I. General Plan Designations: Pro3ee,�.Site - Low Medium and - Medium Residential E Borth = Low Residential South - General Ir,3ustria�l 'iast Low Medium Residential = West General Industrial P � ITEM 0 ' - A . PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 84 -12 - Davis March 13, 1985 Page 2 J. Site Charactoristies: The site slopes moderately to the 'south it— m teiy 2 grade and is vacant with no significant vegetation. 11. ANALYSIS: X. General: The proposed project consists of 8 -plex and 12- pier apartment buildings arranged around a large meandering centrll open space : system. A total of 124 ones- bedroom and 204 two - bedroom apartment units are proposed. The 8 -plex buildings will be located in the northerly portion of the site designated as Low Medium Residential to provide transition of density from ` the adjacent single family(- "'tact. The main entrance to the project will be from Etiwaria "' Avenue, with a secondary access provided from Arrow Route. •the three local residential strzet to the north will be comple ed as modified cul -de -sacs as shown on the detailed site plan, Exhibit '"ta". B. Deli nn RevieewCoCoraittee: The Committee has worked with the applicant - - to resole concerns relative to providing large open space areas and linkages throughout the project, screening of parking, and neighborhood compatibility and transition of density from the adjacent single family residences. The primary 'issue focused upon by the design Review Committee was the architectural concept as it related to the rural character- of the Etiwanda community and the architectural styles required by the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The, Committee was concerned.:. that the originally proposed contemporary Victorian style lacked sufficient architectural detailing and proper building farms to reflect the character associated with the Victorian style of architecture required by the Etiwanda Specific Plan, Based upon the recormiendations of the Design Review Committee, the applicant revised the elevations to provide steep gable-s-- line; and architectural detailing that is consistent with the guidelines established by the Etiwanda Specific Plan, The Committee recommends approval of the revised elevations acid sited an, ne Committee also suggested that the or aaect- 6e to co nditioned provide dense> landscaping between ;argent and parkinR areas in the interior loop road to minimize the _visual It aCt o t#TnBC �1ty. C. Grading Committees This project was submitted prior to the adoption of a- residential -moratorium within the Etiwanda Specific Plan area regarding drainage problems. This site is located adjacent to the unimproved Etiwanda Creek and i_ subject to flooding. To mitigate this concern, the project has been designed with a central detention basin to limit pegs flows from the site to the predevelopment flow rate, seep i ` J CITY OF 159 NCHO CUCAMONGA. STAFF REa ORT O cJ DATE: March 13,, 1985 1977 V TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84-i2 D VIS - The development of 328 apartments on 27.79 acres of land in the Low Medium (4-8 du/ac) add Medium (8 -1 x" du/ac) Residential District, located at the northea i cpr er of Arrow Highway and- ,Etiwanda Avenue - {API! 229 -O E I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of site plan' elevation� and issuance of a negative Declaration: J B. Purpose. Development of'\128 apartments. C. Location: Northeast corner of Arrow Highway and. Ei, Ida t/ I Avenue tExhibit "A"). D. Parcel Size: 27.79 acres. E. Existin4_�rn;nR: Low Medium and Medium Residential. F. Existing Land Use; Vacant..... G. Pro e,;.t Density:. 11,8, du /ac. T. "H. 'Surrounding Land Use and Zonis North - inS gle family residential; tow Residential South Vacant; General Industrial (Subarea 8) Last Etiwanda Creek; Low Medium Residential West - Vacant; General Industrial (Subarea 8) f' 1. General Plan Designations. roaect Site - Low Medium ai;d Medium Residential s North Low Residential South ..1 General Industrial !, East - Low Medium Residential West General Industrial i y j ITEM- D . PLANNING COMMISSION ST:4FF REPORT DR 84 -12 - Davis -March 13, 1985;: Page 2 J. Site Characteristics: The site slopes moderately to the South at approximately grade and is vacant with no sig0ficmt vegetation. EI. ANALYSIS: A. General:` The proposed project "consists a 8-plex and 12-piex apartment buildings arranged around a large wandering 6 tral open space system. A total of 124 one- hedrow and. : two- bedroom apartment omits are proposed. The 8 -plea bulldi gs will be located in the northerly portion of the site de__5"ted, as Laic Medium Residential to provide transition of &rssk& from . the adjacent single family tract. lire main entrance to the project will be from Etiwanda Avenue with a secondary acces,, provided from Arrow Route. The three local residential strea s to the north will be completed as modified cul-de-sacs as show�m on the detailed site plan, Exhibit "B". ry i S. Design Review Committee_ The Committee has worked with the app scant to resolve concerns relative to providing large open space areas and linkages throughout the project, screwing of parking, and neighbofhood caipatibility and transition of density from the adjacent single family residences. The primary issue focused upon by the Design Review Committee las the architectural concept as it czlated to the rural character of the Etiwanda community and the architectural styles required by the Etiwanda Specific Plan., The Committee was concerned that the originally proposes' contemporary Victorian style lacked sufficient i�rchitectural detailing and proper building { forms to reflect the character associated wift—the Victories style of architecture required by the Etiwanda Vecific, Plan. Based upon the recommendations of the Design Review Committee, the applicant revised the elevations to provide steep .gable1*.__,_ roof lines and architectural detailing that is consistent with >, the guidelines established by the Etiwanda Specific Plan.. The -' Committee recommends approval of the revised elevatims site pram. The Committee also suggested that the; roJect ,be conditioned to provide dens:: landscaping between carport andF arkin areas in the interio, loop road to minimize: the visual i act o_t a parking fact jU. C. Grading Committee: This project was submitted prior to the adoption of residential moratorium within .'he EtivandA Specific Plan area regarding drainage problems. This site . located adjacent to the, unimproved Etiwanda ':reek aad is subject to flooding. To mit%ate this concern, the project bas beer, designed with a central detention basin to limit !ice flows from the site to the predeNelopment flow rated see r ., .. - �i "RL G PLANOM C%WSSION STAFF `4EtT DR 84-12 - Davis ` March Las 1385 - Page Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Nap '' Exhibit ''IV - Site Plan - Exhibit new - Landscape Plan Exhibit "D4 "= Grading Plan'. Exhibit "E" - Project tiny 1 E 'hit *F" - & -Plea Eiemation's i Exhibit -6 - 22WPiex Elevations Exhibit re14n - Caroort'Elevatioas Initial Study, Part II U Resolutiot of Approval J' F V I { a r � frt a.r ..'L,Acu�o. PFf_ w.. =i. . "it .. °v.w � .. z • 'a 3.ys: �4�r.'3. n� .. .� ��. ♦ rig y i:. SM G r Y. • !1 l lia ' /t E 2 . a. u .._ s lu k l � r n x Y y w O P � Q c a. u .._ s lu k l � r n ' F+ s N 4 0 u r fig z^ '92 Ll sK. • .. L -ice, t' ip ;� �;� °, CY, F a t ,. � -x 4 r >> tw r \r :�•ti.r ,gip f! .:t .r {= `t r Ti fit: i 1 T+" ;; i ., a 1\ • } ` -K� — c I .�' �'• sn--• A _ .+ C tit ,y �r. "air... A ��_ ' —."'+j off '�• - r, Allk- r r la .l1 +7` � _ _ _ c _fir' � ��♦ s ��. ,� � �s _, o PROJEC 7 r nhtA - ? P, GE SITE AREAr 1,20'00 ,pR 27y7 ACRES _ !`I PROPOSED DE'NO TT. 11.85 UNyT� PiR A T.0 AMML ECI`STINCa .- LM,f'( - PR • R.-3 aaEAS a BLDG i fPE •'-- -• ; A! 000 S 110 t BLgG TYPE "B' 44.000 SQ F; J is �• is } REC. & CWWOE ROCM 154 - -'"'-r�- ,000 SQ F: TOTAL I't AREA CARPDRTS 5y00Q SQ PT 6& Soo SQ FY; -) y 213,e00 5Q FT TOTAL BLDG AREA " PATIO SP42..$ .y � fpF F- _.�UOR < BLDG TAPE .A. SLOB, TYPE l6p- 34 C70 SQ FT } 13:200 `..'Q c N ti ';49,200 SQ -FT TOTAL UNIT DECK SPACE�,� f TgBUW�ICV r.(' 1 BEDROOM 1,14 V ' 2'BEDROOM = C 704 J 3 ;-18 TOTAL fJNITSC154'UNI'TS AT FIRST,FLQWt P4RxINQ r � ERE7 . !JhJCD1lPR E5 y — 124 1 SUROQ� !� 3 3 >a 124 204 2 DRQGM Y 1. 204 $7 2 122.4 TOTAL AEQVtR ED 828 TOTAL PROVIDE a 6 v LaTAt, BLDG AREA �. 219800 SQ AA �'JTAL Pl*ED cOiEAt. 259,400 SQ e, r ✓ 43,2`'.0 SQ Fs - - ,71#208,A00 SQ FT �T6ifix. ^sfiE tEA� _ 400 SQ, ET TOTAL iSQ"�H.yL'*a -VIM 'PAM ^R 5 X OF 91.1 TE AREA Pl[ #FDEt7 3CJ: Iks SITE ARFr?_REQUsit �• i TO— TA -. r 21a" SQ Fi i 4OTp:, PAS, aREAa 25,400 SQ FY 476,200.SQ FT � CTOTAI: SI*AR€A) `~ 7804200 SO,,FT TOTAL.APEtt OR 61, DF SITE ARFA PR£IVIDE:� 'OF L . SOY F SITE AREA REQUIRED r, STREW mn UNC.Cdr %;� FA KING - 30.500 L4 ET STRt��3 R CZIVBa 225,500 SQ 2= b,4ut� SOFT TOT,.( P4VED A \Eii v SfFifT PER QROtM FLOep IRVIT �( i 65 - �` may, i �13..i ISWILIf� L6' J` y�.o: Y+efNlMaitZ �.. r'APO `yep• .. 't nfrs a� t F.t a t UMT BLDG Slob 1 Lp jar I c; TYPICAL 12 VN!T SLOG. REAR +r>i. t•� of � - •:�+'�. _ _ ,K �� - - .�;.� v 1. , ` 1t TY-P�A�Ci2 UNIT SL.DG : FRGNT '; ; [�� ~�� \ill MRy� yTPi�Mf ��N)�.�iM1! • r TYPICAL CkRPi)diT ; END lei WRT i�i 4r 1�y� J-�r 4f FLAMIIiSiUVHIBIT= U-• ETI AANDA AREA URAfN "AC PLAN _ 500 ir, iE B, air PROPOSED V .O DRAIN LI NE , �. t 81 Q_ t;R''i � G? ti � ci.f t' a ♦ �� u w CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA � ' . tE G Eli QiSTiN'�;�vt PRpt?;`lElJ DRAINAGE FLAB( r c AREA 8 ......... ic CITY OF RANCHO CJCAMoNGA F; PART. 11* INITIAL STITDX , ENVIRONMENTAL MEZMIST i DATE'; t �p r APPLICANT, FILING DATE: LOG NUt9£R noJECT. PROJECT ibCATI0Nz l I. ENVIROIaTMENTAL IMPACTSt ,. ' 1 ^ Mxplanctionof all ;'yes". and "maybe" answers Eze required cn attached sheets). ,. rS MAi`HE HD 2. Soils and Geolb¢r., -Vin the,propoval have significant re ul. ?ts 3n: a. Unstable grouad,:covdit ons or in chang,ss in geologic %'elatlonships? b ITisruptions, disTslaceatents, compaction cr burial of the soil? C. Change in topography+ )r ground surface contour intervals? d. ,The' destruction, covering or modification ' f aayr imiqve $ealogic or physical features? p,• e. An ,',,pote�tial increase in kind or grater 0=b8A u of soils, affeetillg either on, or off site''�on4itonsc f. changes in aro5 3n siitationf of depositions? �. S. Exp,;sure of people or property to geologic' - t, hazards such as earthquakes, landslides; natd- . slides, ground failure, or simi*ar hazards? increase in she rata of ea:traelion and/or ; use of any resource ?.. kT 2. _ ra�.o v. Will the ptoposai have significant :. j *i lts inz p mk P_17 h c Page t YES 'i,1°B£ 140 a. :changes in.-rurrents, or the course of direction �' 4 of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream channels? be. Ch anges. in absorption - rates, �drain8 a ,., & patterns, •: or the rate and amountrof surface-water runoff? . c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any body of water? e. Discharge into surface\qaters, or iiy : VMa, alteration of surface wa6r: l uality? f. Alteration of groundwater charalteristics? g. Change in the quantity of groundwa�\YS, r either through fiirect additions or with- drawal.s, or through interference with ;an' aquifer? Qualicgr? Quantity? -- fil h. The reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for public water supplies? i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or seichen'T 3. Air Quality. Will the proposal have significant results in ,_ r 'f ' a. Constant or periodic air eFaissic�n� mobile _i ,frem or indirect sources? Stationary source? b Deterioration of ambient air qua?,ity ;nd /or interference -with the atiaiur,.ent of rppiicable air ql�*alitl standards? c. Alteration of local or regional climatic `r conditions, affecting air movement, nolsture or temperature? Via. Biota: f� Flo-A. Wi,ol the proposal nave significant results a. Change i`a the characteristic of species, - including diversity, Alstr$,butiou, or number of apewrf_es ^ nay,: of plants , a. t EedsttYiox,' of the numbers;, of anY unique, r=e or aud�k rsd specl k of plants: } , Page 3 tES MAYBE 'No c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of in•o �l — plants an area? d. Wuct£on.;n the potential for agricultural / production? / Fauna. 'fill the proposal have significant results in:,. a. Change is the 6racter3;i2cs of species, including diversity, distzibut£csx, or numbers of any speci{ -,s of animals? Jr b. iteduction of the numbers of any unique, rare; ar endangered species of animals? f } c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of animals Into an area, or result in 1 barrier to the mig7� ttiou or novemant of animals! „1 � d. Deterioration or removal of existinl', fIsh or wildlife habitat? i 5. Pb lat on. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Wail the proposal alter the locat, distri- bution, density, diversity, or gr:, rate of the human populticu of an area? b. Will the proposal: affect axis in g housing, or a create demand for additioa housing? b. Socld- Economic Factors. Will fbo_,proposai have. ' sigaif,icant results :ate a.. Change in local or ragional s cio- economies characteristics, including economic or commercial r?£vers#y, tax rate, and property _ Values? n ?+. Will project cosu; be equkably distributed awn& project beneficiaries, .e,, buyersa r tau payers or project users? 7. land Use and Planning Considerstious. ii�Zi2 the, proposal nave si�s±ffaant results -in" a. A substantial a texation of the present or planned land use of an area? s b. & confl4rt with �y "deli tieas, a Sectives, Policies. or adopted plans of any govermental entities ?�� 1 c. An impact "pon.;the,44aity or quantity of t ex U4 Consumptive or non -consumptive r ': - re�e'af�Onal e�r�ztuaities? � I tt page S _ i YES 'biAYBF NO Transportation- Will the oposal have significant results inn _. a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement ?. b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for new street construction? Effects on exl.-tting parking facilities, �. demand for net, ''garkingZ d. Substantival impact Span existing transports- ` tion systems? �. Alterations to present patterns of circula- tior. or movement of people and/or goods? f. Alterations to or effects on present and potential water- borne, rail, mass transit A air traffic? g. Increases in traffic "!-,gzards tti, motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 9. CulturalResourcas. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, paleontological. and /or historical resources? 10. Health, Safety, and Nuisance Factors 'kl the proposal Have mignificant results 3.n a. Creation of any health hazard or potential 'health hazard? y� b. Exposure of people to potential heal(,.h haws ids? i t. A tisk of ' explosion or release hazardous substances in the event of an accident? d. An increase in f-je - mber of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposura•,,�of people to such organisms? e. Increase in existing noise levels? . cpasure of peesIe to poteo;;ial�y dangerous - noise levels? g: The creation of 4jectionable odors? ��'" b. An increase in light or glare? Pagw� 5 (� YES 21LYBS NO 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have s3gnif� ant - results in; w a. The obstruction or degradati)ii,nf and scenic vista oor view? b, The creation of`an aestheticai.`Iy offll:sive site? ` c. A conflict with the obJective of designated' or potential aCenic cz,rridors? 12. utilities and Public Services. Will the p .t osal have a signs£icant Aeed for new systems, o' '! alterations to .he foll.owinge ,t a. Electric power? b. Natural or Vaekaged g ? �+✓ c. Communications systems? d. Water supply? / e. Wastewater facilities? f. Flood control structures? 4 g. Solid waste facilities? y h. Fire protectian2 i. Police protection? J. Schools ? k.. Parks or other recreational fa'0114t4es? \-� >. I. Maintenance Of Public facilities, including reads and flood control facilities? m. 00 x governmental services,.,:. 13, Enerk.y and .scarce itesources. Will "the proposal have sigri£itaut resstlts in: _ a. Use of substantial or excessive xuel or energ,r? b. Substantial increase la demand upon ,existing sources of energy? c. An increase in the demand for devela went of p new sources of eIer ,? ° d. An i era se or perpetuation of the cons F umption t t` of -rea.�lsle farad of energy, when feasible Tess abYe� tzc. {f energy afire available,, ;� _. Al , � 77. ' Page 6 I - r i n, S MAYBE NO e.` "'Substa_tal depletion of any nonrenewable or scarce natura?j,resourse? 14. Mandatory Fiudinns bf Significance. a.. Does the project have thei"�pctent_al to degrade the quality of the environment, sucstantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish• or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining = levels, - threaten to eliminate a plant or animal coz— .mity, reduce the aiaznber or restrict the range of a rare or eAdangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods 61 California history or preLlstory? b. Does the project have the potential toy achieve short -term, to the disadvantage of long terii, ±nvironmental goals? (A short- term��impaet on the environment is one which occurs is a',relativaly grief, definitive period of time while long- term impacts will endure well. into the future!. c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed In connection w ±'th the effects of past projects, and probable future projects). d. Does the project have'ziavironmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects or. human beings, either directly or indirectly? II. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRoNMENTAi';,WALUATION (i.e., of affirmative answersetp, 1 the above questions'plus a discussion,.of proposed mitigati'�n measures). r 1.. III. DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation - ;� j I find the proposaA project COULD NOT have a siilificant effect on the enviro=ent, and a NEGATIVE DECLA'EAti011 wail be1F2epare�. _ j ,. G I find that although the proposed project' tot Id have a ignificant 1 effect or-the envirnsment, there will not be a siguiftcan`t effect S in this case because the mitigation measures descilbed ou'an attached, sheer � 4g 'been added, to the project. A Nis 1)ECL dU5t7I N WIC BE PR A =. (--� I find the prorrasec project MA`r ave,a sigh ant ,effect o #'E the \: j___J envirnment, and an ENVIROMMO IMPACT REPORT s aired. I Date i itle _ Ld C� t, y^ } f .,A,� kSOLUTION NO. ' A RESOLUfION OF THE RANCHO CUGAMO'AGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEYELPPMENT REVIEW NO. 84 -I,- LICATED ON THE NORTHEAST- CORNEkAF ETIWANUA AND ARROW IN THE LOW- MEDIUM AND MEDIUM RESIDt``_I= .`^,,SISTRICTS WHEREAS,-on the 24th day of.Septembor, 1984, a complete application was filed by William G. Davis for review of.the above- described project; and ` WHEREAS, on, the , 13t'r day' -:of March,' 1985, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a rusting to'considv the above4escribed project. NOW, THERE SORE, the Rancho Cucamt�ng,a F tarp iing Comaission resolved as follows: ` SECTION 1 That the fol vpnq�j_M can be met; I. That the proposed project is: consistent with the abject it es:df the-General Plano and 7, , 2. That the proposed use'; is it a` "accord with,; the objective of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and ti'.2 i purposes of the :district irr which the site is k located, and J 1.�... 3. That the proposed use is in,xompliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Wwanda Specific Plan ;' and ;7 4. That thb proposed 1' e, together witY`the conditions applicable thereto' will not be detrimental the public health, safety, ir, Velfar•e, or materially in,�urious t,), properties or improvements in the ' vicinity. SECTION 2: That "although this project'4ili create adverse impacts an the PiTironment mitigation measures are included, in the project,> design 'or, required is conditions of approval that " "dloee'.,impacLs tG A non - significant le :firs that a Negative L'ECiarutIni is `� '4ued on March 13, 1985. I SECIK 3: That "�vei(opment Revicw No. 84 -12 J.% appr Ved subject to onp �3ous and `attached Stanfi d Condit,.`•pns. G DIVISION: - - a 4` 1, Final landscape p iett- shall idCc ,; y smaller suu- neighborhoodsr within they *,_Nett usik individual tree varieties: 0701 -02 0 3-13-85 PC Agenda 2 of 4 \i' Resolution No, DR84 -12 - Davis,' Page 2 2. A coAlnuous on-site greenway shall be provided to connect public. sidewalk on Etiwanda Avenue with the ~easementreek regior'ta7 trail and shall be dedicated as,- and n designed per the regui�anents of the(, Etiwanda Specific Plan. 1 3. Any fencing provided at the terminus of Morton Avenue, Emnptt Avenue and Corr;;tall 'Avenue shall be view fencing such as wrought -iron to prevent a "walled" effect. 4. Provide extens'ye landC ing treatment at project y _i entrances and etween carport parking ;,areas "ard drive J aisles. Decorative walls and planters Shall be provided at project entrances consistent with approved plaits. r S. Trash enclosures shall bey" provided with lattice -type overhead shade structures and mail boxes shall be �a.ovrded { with solid overhead structures compatible with the Victorian architectural theme. 6. A continuous sidewalk system.shall be provided, wherever possible, that rrovides an interconnecting' linkage throughout the project. In particular, a sidewalk shall be provided - around the edge of the large central open space. ENGINEERING DIVISION: r 1. Modified cul -de -sacs shall be Oe *vided within the project l; at the southern termini of Emmett and Cornwall Avenues." Right -of -way for stt<x'l A he dedicated to the satisfaction of the City Engi <i4 r. 2. The main drive aisles shales tte cov#ructed as private 'gutter streets to include curb , and (28, mirtitqum curb , sgarat on), ,,AC pavement, and street lights. Sidewalks shall be provided on one side or an alternate approved sidewalk plan approved. s.. The proposed storm drain sy -:cem to serve the northerly '.; cup -de -sac shall be� < _designed for a 100 Year storm plus emergency overflew. Easements shall be;;,,provided to the ultimate outlet facility 4. All drainage fa,.ilities outleting into Etiwanda Greek shall be subject: to approval and a permit from the San Bernardino Count�,Fluod Control District, i S. A structural block wall and slope paving hall be, provided along the easterly beutrdory ac7, the site subject to the recommendati6w., Sit bernkdino of thr County Flood Control Distric.,,�and ihO 4,oproval of the City Engineer. T Resolution No. DR04 -120- Davis -A Page 3 6. Construct portion of the Etlwanda,Area Master Plan Storm tf ain Lire ithin Arro�v Route from Etiwanda Avenue to .__ Etiwanda Crd�k. Also outlet velocity protection Treasures trill be required within the channel. - This condition l replaces the previous requirement for an onsite retention basin. f BUILDING & SAFETY DIVISIONt Jl_: 1. oncepi;ua7 grading plan approved subject to the followings a. Acceptable , %ethod of draining from streets to basim ''� b. Permission to drain north cul�4e- sacs to Flood Control District Channel, and( ;'positive 100 year overflow backup system. C. Northerly and southerly property line. wall- be ? flood wall to required limits of 100 year overflow from Etiwanda Creek. ` d. Entire easterly property line wail to be flood wail. { APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13th DAY OF MARCH, 1985. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE. -C1�t OF RANCHO CUGAMONGA BY' Dennis L. Stout, Chairman . ATTEST. ., \' Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning C%NnissiL)n of the City of ° Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing"Resolation ms duly and regularly introduced', passed, and adopted by the Piann'ing tp,-inission of 'the City of Rancho.Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planninti Commission held on the 13th day of March, 1985, by the following vote -to -wit: "4 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES:, COMMISSIONERS: r' ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:] AOL 1 ��L 9'aTi U°LMYTCgOA 2N+� ^ra VM �Tc'Q•. A 9W d addOr CCO CuM� �Y CCC 8 G L mPcRp L u q ° q p >QE�ra° ` +4L Y ° EbXE .iR o q t Oq qca y oGW a T . }3 OT2 R qq ^pcn T 6 u d q ti 10V T -62 cp�9 N� > 6pC nay .T Yin=. r.0� 01636 mod.°. O. _i Q S ♦.d OO.LI Y.`T9 ° ♦ � y r9 ^- y `y 3'n p�9 ,�,� ESL 2�as Y LvC aV. LO. qL1�- nV V> -y b ...Ci. W °N E 1 )�� WR L^4. dELOG CU 2 �qt qy C�'N eDC �p E O d�� 3YTrYt 9C Y`°Ory dQ C U d d Y L 9° N,f A4� YRd bE R YE°� OTC i. NV ��=.� ,y Y M A I EOE� YH� 5FCC° .0 p C t°i L6E.VRrO.p,,+bRUb 40Cq� �Nh�F YCO N K a M r > n V N E Y °u C 0.c _ E p •°°1Yq q ,q °O As 4 ♦ anC' T u,� tC K °`o,QyYN M. yu N caT �" .T. JR „- ,.: Rav- ^^ ne.c�:.z T ..�.a� � ^baj� ^ruY Ea. °' •a. .�ti.Egap� Y °t'_m �q X �n ��.w rhOCx,` ♦„3 �O v-vv'c N.'YLp o,3 °E V ;y « 3dV YNLC LO v AEFN..0 E dna. ° �... -m •rE- u'°. °i” °G.�1 +! •� �, ° ° , ^✓i. ♦� III L Sd 92p aM d. °T C1 _ °VU ORR ^. Rpa! NV q`�LN O ^VC6v 2N li0 s� O F- EAR fir. cu °t. en.x M. rL dM 6ii 64�t6 ♦) � p >prr p N f N b `v�*r 1 m « Aai t L p w q L x Oti7 tyt. . LL V L'.'_ V n °c NY.A 6pU`pp m W Y C. Qt n _ } E nugV m O W d�p..0 q ry��piw ��nu i ., w\ I I'% ma c� ov v_.�. < <y- aiTaY'o quap+. a Af A y m E L - A Ow q.0 R .0 n a.n 45 dy ba q ( OO ab dj M aCN F nY n N Lw c V 1 +' rGS Mu E L iibl d N aQ40 TM. 1-dQab Chu ddTU CG »A L c "� 0 LO N.�VW G AOU T i. O PN o d4YT �.: Gb �.�Gd f[s�r V1 Lu2t NMt q r Oda.. d6MC i_ - {i Ci O16 N y O tl: � a D u A u b 'bcPN N G� r� 4 d^ � V LW t O' y V.. dw n^ � N c d• N C ' .ESN O Q 0 c Cq i d i F 3 d N N 1 C pa imp E t CCN 4�tl �! hf, S G N V J C d d ' MOW tlq tl KN -";z I-- N Yi Nd d2 uA... OIF ZzLC n Mb OE.p. q .b., u dQ i •dc %Lm _ OTU.�M., R4+ N.ru OFd a +1 b qAr Stl ac A.y ado-N �,yo.� o u'..n A°r'a b. «n- 'Sb'�:. ' O• aA 0• 0000 :5 0 iA°�.. 9 0�. YYC b C 3b� EQ ru�r CY Gk12N4d 6b +06 c 6Y d it WOw6'N a,G pd 1-+MD N. p ` bsC Cu' �6uN W dG �w O~ d L p G 00 da s O o< G q f a E n N .CRdI tlb ' . � -G O u i GM1` er.. i in F G N2 N Q'atx.i O.pc wN �k.A Nngo NYR4M w [nn � pp N.a �Z N N CCL O. i� ^p uA LK p .^ ylb b S N G p A y O L L b st ^ Z N L d b O 2 ^ y^ u � F L 3 u i C O , u C a N � N q ^^ `u diG OCF NdC AVN Q O L V MO E 0 pii C c d •- ..O.N }A GA..> $ C.p�� d � rn V� �cOOVN. Y C OY b "' >G •d OYf CA rY.^ �. q C d ai.. N d r �cL Y =T a4 ,..GC. tY b «WO ��oT� S. 9d��u,9 ETC�C ice+ YJ C TNC Nom. ,OO S> CC M G.� p2iO .pCxJ Q y.db C..pdj q 9 it q0 qy A o m e o . 29='Z b r5 u� S h c ,., o "a v dao ua, 0 cba 4 q ayo aiccjs _G di "L"2 �'rrA by° y M bC C d w U Gw :2 a b p..•V A FrgR 2�id a Oud a�� C.. l- Cb L p� a ��: CV u d b M. uriiy O Q•u d 0, d�^'Q. s. Y b .X � i u y.^ i nOi �° i a 15 sd. ` (' •d-aaa .iv ,p p1.C�� 0E Mi� .e Gda II d Y V _y Oq 6bN 1�6ua4U WUNV6iN� Cu � Cp )FOm.5M y Crw64 NAN 4N— 3 Np I�NL � •• q •� A L d V�, � C a A � C �/� ^ c t^ v ,p F m �E OC G'W <�Vy yY S� N^ r �Li apia V aU V'^Yi" < 411 .ftY y� pTj Y �O u^ c 4- g4YY u� � 1- pa; =YTa LLOO •^ T =L A. °< J � O.' _ � �"' �`j Yom.,,_, a C° �� : E � • • a°..a r e V YC• y F ntga cart C. �N Vd < Nw d 'S � b< _ r°P� tL6L dO IS q SIZ a.y • �.cC. a p " ... Y �q 4U .�, 4.0,. .^qC� LL. a.N Vy °6F '•L K Y v�" •`p2 aYa� HVC U' A m °L N tJ "E P6 •-• O A ou p 0 i t} ��R nod O� Y� rta a•fJ O R O.Q q �� y N 4 < N .r. aq O_ O E.n O c =�L .9 < � La Y F N Z O^ Y ,C 1�tlWL <h . 4 q N LL � C • dC Q 36 aa°rUU ^N N �' V4U M O YI c Y.0 ate VO4 C �11Y u� N�� A L sV.Q. L <p n cY A �o °a •La . E 4N 6L EiY a.LL N. YO O.y tigr i�LO d G YX" •w see O7 ai,� C. E q. OQ Y a �N= K bTb ^d t< a ^N a y DEL L 6pgG �E c 4 �� yE ° b qop °Oy v _ ^� G° wY 4 i dm yN^ n n. to � '^1: EC^' Y v•:J,/ <N L. ��ML E.•- 4a < artE y,�� YT yF ° :e a .caw L � 2D. y ai O Y - •.,'p Y ° ;u Y w.a= a• w¢ H �� 4 AU p^ .•n Y�ay t �.L°a _N _Yq� u NL t LL cC qTY t CGpac L - €on L€s h�" haL+ ia�ym _2s. � tfv rnagnc. acyL�� u ='h �= C Cb da �y OI�S ..L°.a L G. q ` 4GYt 'a `pp G Uq R Lma~ = �v L �� a N Ytr 1! i qu aeo -'e 3fu 'O.N, N w:'1..� 3' q "° •moo qwc � �`•i. .,\. \ 2 d E�a". bd am pR aea c '°' ti.: ' -N C V 7 y a N Ct •N W �� L 46 sy L O �° ,(i L W O O O � ay a• a R 7r t^ •.Q. �. N W O L 4 d dL1L NO- m y Y.0 NV 79 •-a n° �A bL0 V � �}.,q V G — ^O'er Eq ,uY .� c b4^ E piQ -O� y �O 21. b v u4a �i a . C U.dD GP. V 2 _rnw0.. '.LO. 0 60,A4 n9�p0E d A b^ E. Nb °� n u L G y 7 q p E 2 O ` L 4 ^N V L Sw 3 �d P L d Ot N^ _Cy . DVS L � b ... 0� C 9 b u°i- E p p _ cV � • E ' • Ni •l 1 t, to •. C4 w e. tiVEW m V.a�i L Oi�'..N. 4W` O Sz °L o aoyT abga c dagdo c ° N o aq`ov` �€ > H a �'u rna ic•ca dm a1 V N r L N L q ° C C LLdr.:: V du9'r v yaOS� LoR nE ut q C. moo amc o w o° A 4bt nOyn69 4 roccrn' W um �dauL } � ^. Y GiL ate...: o� c C Eq ay p�aNi ....'a• a O < NCa! CL d""L qC °.w'Ciy d E 6' Ny O. LOat40.y A. VL A yVLG Od' SCO.0 N.yC K 4 w.^1LpL 4 ? a r cstL >' p�= Oa4 TN u. q°a q qC.. Nq. } f V ,..0 O: VLLYrq. 60L° L WV aft+.. al �L PL+C •.� � q. � �E °OY Y.V V X04 61N n1 au dbY.. N aN�•. 6LC R44p CO ?tuC OG� -E ^4.. G.�rE CW.Li WG�Y KOL w0014 �C b � rq. YA Wk b • RFI LL a W1L `. ♦y 9D.ga«3 V «« wq V E L 9 ....ate .•' O G ` 9 - .{.a `•a7 u as S, r ¢.« '".ai �DU.DbCJ o ,'O. o .° Ma � a DL u° o. , o c i �' V gl! EE n �L CF pug m pJ C Vb tT ♦ `T N1 L�QiW T O� in Lu Ai 69 Y oNq c HS LO N' 2 FN Y V� Laa p .-M ay '� Cy s� ..nom eam a° nqN N� n L9 uNU Tou a «n` wa aY ae� a a `y p2 EVp� ue L^ a p N W oE6 c L y yW ^ NT EY 6u V LCW TN. L/1 a V« L O L u 9 c N C W Rq q_ Q ti L NW n ` O' T. WLNLLt1 SC a- ct - s 1 1 W E4 p�C Np ^ rn = JL p.°C A° c LT ev v L � ao� W .- .v '- L € a o ♦u _ s. � v o m e � nr+ nf. - -. >._ J E yj N 6r C nJ L" g., ^' E�YF 4 Nu ET du q w YTauDq C ° Z; V= u.y to` e L NAY a ♦- .�, az- T=- ° c aQ �, C6 6 o T2L a4 F4 O O L Yr ��Cd Ea ' t2 u La n c o Y 2 V D p 4 � L.Y u Vs A E D. uriu. �o,W ro.°• � N "♦ VJ C da.Y N Ny t� 2 6 O+rs� yam. O EEO CCU ,.. SAC S o y u v u« > .L c^ y ac vq �i }.c$ W y .54 Q V Vy. L tj w q dONL OA L� Y N... •O.4T.. v L F}L 8y �rU a dC ( N 9v F ~ V t„iw 'O. CL 4.1 s G 6 Qt0 C la. a a tad. L �W. CCU „• VL .rdN y La N 'NO NC Z4.0 p�V . Gy u � � rr �� st �r ap >L � �..� a•-. ' i°. q ai ILNa".i^ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA c�^Mo STAFF REPORT ` ° , N DATE: March 13, 1985 15 fl 1% ' TO: Planning Commission FOOM: '„ Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Kra11,.Elt9ineering Technician - SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8902 - KIRSHBAUM - A dvislon of - 3.15 acres of land into 2-- in parcel` the Office /Professional Development District' located on the east side i of Grove Avenge between Rancheria:.Nive and San Bernardino Road. C PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of Parcel Map. B. Purpose: To divide 3.15 acres of land into 2 parcels� \!!f ;f C. Location: On the east side of Grove Avenue betw 4n San BOrnardipo Ro dadaarid Rancheria Drive. \ D. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 - 1.20 Acres `% Parcel 2- 1.95 Acres Total 5Acres E. E -.ting Zoning: 0ffice /Professional Development District. F. Existing Land Use: Vacant._ G. Surrounding Land Use- North - Existing business. �\ South - Single family. East - Single family and an existing business. West - Mobile home park - City of Upland. H. Surrounding General Plan and Development Code Designations: North - Office /Professional. South - Low (2 -4 du /ac). East - Medium (8 -14 du /ac). West - City of Upland. i r I. Site Characteristics: The site. slopes approximately 2% in a southest werly direction. It is vacant: with little vegetation ,r ITEM E j PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT v ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND' PA. C t,41AP 8902 March 13, 1985 e= Page 2 II. ANALYSIS; The purpose of this parcel map is tolsubdiwide the property info tWo parcels. Specific development plans hav�, not been submitted at this time,. The surrounding streets,,will be improved upon develfopment of,-Athe parcels. Only one access point will be allowed on Grope` Avenue, therefore, a r^utual driveway will " + _required to serve both parSiels. J III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: "Also attached for your revia,W and consideratf`;e is Part I of the initial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the,lnitial study, the environmental checklist, and ~ ,ms conducted a field investigation. ; Upon completion and revidw of the rilitial Study and field invesx►gation", Staff found!, no adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the proposed subdivision, IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of PublAc= Hearing have beirn sent to surrounding property owners #nd placed in the 'Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also bey completed. V. RECOMMEND It is recommerded\ that the Planning Crxssian adopt the attached res /f(ution conditionally approving Tentative Parcel Map 8902 and authorizing'the' issuance of a Negative Declaration. Respectfully sutted,� L13 K -1aa „ Attachment,,. ificidity_Aap Parcel Map Resolution; City Engineerbs Report t .. >> Initial Study a 1 ��A$ CC) �Z yy wr •• Y LLJ Q CL Ld F— Wv. 3r fit ja' •4st �- � �A :� � J . � �`„_,J ..per .M�wrJrw+�n`-unr •`y .•�` _ ma Pk ik ,�, y � � � ar r .`.S'. t'" 3 ;�� •Ft'F'k GSCG•' �•s ?'\. �„' i . ` .hsYF � "'r t�i I I r � • \tom �. - �i - z �,�� ;'• r`..' 4 �q � t •�•• lI f i p l y - i w__L _�' � _. _ �i�z �i ?�`'' � is "�y,. �• �� ci .. � s. "s„d - . _...� ?�. '� '; +•+s�';�fr�� —�1 }��- }- -lei k�� -- � �}� � {� : :. r7 ►:-A V Rt iN P NTAL RFC EW APPLICATION - C') '4NI'IAL S`TUDYI - PARS` I GENERPC For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be dieted and submitted to the Oevalapment Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Planning Division staff will prepare Part II of the initial Study and make recommendations to Flapping Commission." Thn Planning Commission will make one of three determinatidns: (1) The project will . have no significant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration wilt be idled, (2) The }project will have a significant envinmental impact and an Environmental. Impact Report will be prepared,'ar � (4) o An additional information report should he supplied by the applicant giving further inform, concerning thd- Proposed project, Date Filed: Project Title: Tentative Parcel Map No. 8go2 Applicant's Name, Address, Telephone. Robert J. Kirshbaum„ 982 -1551 {714) 525 North 13th Avenue, Up. and, CA `91786 Namfi, Address, Telephone of Person To Be Contested' Concerning this Project:' Linville- Sanderson & Associates, 980 - 1211(714) 8587 Arrow Route, Suite H, Rancho Gucamoncpa, CA 81730 Location of Projecti East side of Grove Avenue between San Bernardino Road. and Rancneria Drive. Portion of Lot 1 of Trans No. 2952:' "`' 4 J Assessor's Parcel No.: 207- 120 -001 List other permits necessary from local, regional, state and federal agencies and the agency issuing such permits: NONE - ----- PR(3JECT DESCRIPTIOM Proposed use or proposed project: Division of 1& d into three;, parcels_ for rut:ure sales and /or development. a of� lcrea s p 4 project area end square footage of existing and proposed ldings, if any:t . r5 Gross Acres (137,156 Sa ft i No existing buildin s on site. 'No buildings aronosed at this time. Describe .ifie envirorim ' a1 settl`nn of the project site: :Jncluding information i' on topography, soil 3t bility, plants, (trees),�; land animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, lard use of surrrundiag propert: and the descriation of any existing structures .and- their, use (attache necessary sheets): The Project site 1oc�afiay, "< on the east'r- Ayenjje between San Bernardino Road and Rcncheria firi'v ;s uacant_and wifh_ I jut a )existinlr trees or major oTawt Ti. ^� , t r�ahv slo_+rgrt ae'�roximately 14 feet from0o=UAIt_ILo1 ut ThLm adiaca. nt n op- Arty `o i the 'southe gt'suanort5 4 on = � ^sin��ami1\y f'ra�P her },ses. and the adiacent orau rtv t nrs he Werth° =�4 0, i s uo"- .,�rnrfi c two ,n, r�y_ frame and stucco buildings Dna e m - �-= �.9.' S e nlum�Eino 2rrd H /4A£. ' Company and the other is a church to ating -haa'i r .aa rg th adjacent oronerti ,is limited io �n{� t flower hazy To the' north .across San B rn�r i`no Roat1 �� a v r 1 o r n v houses dYLti a dereVict buildine x (*mm� i`ih a c ocktail west acr IS_'Gh dGe yenu is a wpT nark icrspned with � concrete _block wall . Tn h on °eh' acrnsc a Q ; a rtrj arp p rat o_Tder houses in ;vfr con ditian Mnet ni> tha t�«ncrmd Ra site are paved but do not hay.z -. curbs and gutter—} A - — =eject Is the project part of a larger project, one,-of a series of cumulative actinns= which although individually small, may as a why' have significant environmental impacts _ n 0. .k � o _ AOL 14ILL TIfIS PROJECT: YES . NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? --K- 2. Create a substantial chgjnge in existing noise of,.produce vibration ,or,�91are? f X 3. Create a substantial g5arge in demand for munl{{14pal' t services (police, fire, water, 'sewage, etc,)? 1r X 4. Create changes in the existing Zoning or 0eneraT Plan designationsY�� 5. Remove any existing trees: How.many? R 6. Create the need,for use or disposal of potentially hazardous maters aIIc-hv ¢> ; substances, flamr�ables or explo fives? explanation of any YEs8'answers above (attach addiiTOnaJs;;eet ' if necessaryjs 7. Estimate the amount of ;sewage and solid waste materials:�is project will generate daily: NONE (; 8. Estimate-6e number of auto and truck trips generate `-dafly by this . << project 3d0NE 9. Est:' the amount ofd__ �t��tting and filling) ,required for this quGic yards'- NOME 71 ,a 10. If the pmiect involves the construction d7,resideniial units, cq�;'`lete the form or the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereb,t certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached • exhibits. �,"esent- the data and i4rormation required for this initial evaluati,i6 to tho.best of my ability, and that the facts, statement and information presetted,are true and correct zo the best of -my #jo4,fledge,a� �« belief. I further understand that additional information may be required :ae submitted before: an adequate evaluation can. be made by the P'f�`j ~rai'rtg Division. fiats• Jlgr(aturer� fRi✓' /� Tr`lle r -1 v r <i SITEs — . The project site, located onthe east side of Gxave Avenge $etwea:r Sag �...' Bernardino Road and Ttancberii Drive, is vacant atd witbout any' existing 'trees t ar` major plant life. The topggraphy sloVes apprO3 1gav,ely 141-aet,from northeast to southwest. The rdjaceut property to Die southeast supports -_! k one -story single family fram: housas and the act ?acen4 properry to Lke northeast supports tc�!, •one- s'torp tame anw� �tncon "'buildings. ,:drne accctmo -� � _ dates a plumbing .^nc' Ititic ccmparzy and the other is a Ourch meeting hall:' Landscaping on borl� acsnt ad' beds. J Propeneues #s lamt d to a few uuicept flower To eke snort's across $xn Beraardi��sd are several older unkept houses ani I _ a derelict bu3l'ding accomodatfng a c ckt4l .61ynge. Tp; else west across Grove Avenue is a well kept 'trailer nar14 screened with a cp;,cretz block, t ;Y�iil. To the south across R:ancheriu Drive, are several index houses �n fair r_oMitio�. Most of the streets around the;projeet ;4ite are paved but ' do not have ,:urbg and gutters. n z y _ RESOLUTION NO. t, e 1� A RESOLUTION OF THE" PLANNING COMMISSION of THE CMT OF Ij RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING. PARCEL MAP NUMBER 8402 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. 8902), OCATEn ON THE EAST SIDE OF GROVE AVENGE BETWEEN RANCHERIA"ANO SAN BERNAREINO I` ROAD i `r WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel MAD Number 8962,: submitted by k"ohert Kirshbaum and consisting of 2 parcels, located on the ease side of Grove r ?venue between Rancheria and San Bernardino Road, beinq a division Df a portisin of Let �i, Tract 2952, Book., 41, "Pages 26 & 27 Recnrd'q of S ?n Bernardino County, State of Culifcrn.a; and WHEREAS, on November 9, 19zs4, a formal app 1icatio,q s submitted requesting revier of the above - described Tentative Map; ,and,. WHEREAS, on Marc% I3, 1985 the Planning yCommissior+ held a duly advertised public hearyr�'f_ar_the above - described map, NOW, THER5,0 THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, PLANNING COMMISSIOK RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: }; cCTION I: That the following findings have ^beer made: 1. ?`hat the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the pr000 d subdivisiori ism consistent with the General Plan_ 3, That the site is physically suitable for„ the proposed developmepir, 4. That the proposed suD, {a�vision and imurovements will nct cause substantial, environmental damage, public_ health problems. or have adverse affects cr; abo;4 --q �_• - property. SECTION 2: Tht:t this praject will not create significant adverse environmertal impacts and a- fieg�tEive Declaration is issued on March 13, 1985. SECT -ON 3: That T en?tiva .:narc_el { n -ng there o. v2tNrvTGV'- atit�7C44-tiCY _,i the recommer�ae onditions of Ap:%raval perto`,ning thereto, � APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF MARCH, 1985. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: a Denni s L. tout, a Erman 1. ;rE ATTEST: Ric Gomez,' peputy,ecretary ' I, Rick Go ez,. Deputy SecratarK of the Pianninq Commission of the City of Rancho Cucam6n9a, do hereby cerf; fy that the foregoing'Resolution was duiv and ' regularly introduced;' passed, and adopted by_ the Planning Commission o� the { City of Rancho ;Cucamonga, -ILt;a regular meeting of the Planning Commjssirn'held \ ' on the 18th ,day of March, 1,985, by the following vote—to-wit:,, *'7 ,:,AYES: COMMISSIONER S , NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS 0 , ;I I CITY OF RANCHO C RECD N&NDED, CONDITIONS 'OF APPROVAL LOCATION: East side of Grove Avenu' bet46en TENTATIVE PARCEL hAP NO. 8902, Rancheria Avenue and ai Bernardi^o_ Road FILED* November 11, 1 DATE m84 LECLAL.DESCRIPTION: A subdivision Hof a NUMBER OF LOTS: 2 portion of Lot 1, Tract 2952 Book,4; Pages GROSS ACREAGE. 3.15 26 & 27, Records of San Bernardino County, ASSESSOR PARCEL NO*. 207- 12 O-OD1 State of California DEVELOPER OWNER ENGINEERISURVEfqRL Robert Kirshbaum SAME Sanderson & Assoc. 525A. 13th Avenue 219587,,Arrow Rte. Ste H llama, nd, CA 1/1786 A Rricho Cuc_ CA 11730 77, - 0 Imprjpvemevt and dedication. L requirements in accordance with f1t1'e 16 of the 34unicalpal Code 'of the 'City of Rambo Cucamonga faclude, but ma y not he lim ited "to, the follobting: I A. Dedications and vehicular Access 1. Dedications shall be made of all Interior street rights-of-way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. X 2. Dedication shall he made of the following rights-of-way an the following streets,.- -,;,4 additional feet on Grove Avenue "5 additional feet on Red Hill Count�y Club Drive additional feet on X 3. Corner property line radiUb W1 I M b e quired per City Standards. 4. _-All-rialits of 9-6icular-Angmss and I be dedicated as foTfows:-' 5. ,Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint m4interiarlee of all common roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by- C.r,.&k- s and. shall be recorded concurrent with tfie, Map.� X 6. All existing easements lying within future right -of -way are to be quitclaimed or delineated an the map per City Engineerrs' requirements. X 7. Easements for sidewalk for public use shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private 'property. 8 Surety X 1: Surety shall be posted iand an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the' City Engineer and City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements prior to building permit issuance for each parcel. 2, A lien agreement must be executed prior to I recording of ttie'map for the following: 3. Surety shall be posted and an-�agreement executed, guaranteeing completion 'of, all on -site d6inage facilites necessary for :.-dewatering all parcels,,-to the satisfaction of the Building and (.SIfety 'Divison prior to recording for Z _ � Zhr prior ta`Issuance of 'building permit for C. Street Improvements Pursuant to the City of Ranch Cucamonga Mun aI Code, Title 16, Section I 1 16.36.120, the subdivider may enter into (,?r' agreement and post security' with the ;City guaranteeing the required construction prior to recordation of the map and/or building permit issuance. 1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A,C:'pavezent, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. 2. A minimum of 26 -foot wide pavement within a 40 -foot wide dedicated right -of -way shall .be constructed for all x lf- section streets... -- X 3. Construct the following missing improvements: Prior to building permit issuance for each parcel. ;f Curb; & A.G. Side Drive Street reet A.C. Median Strut Nar4e -Gutter Pvmt. Walk "A r. Trees I; hts Overlay. Islantl* other a ^�'e X X Meanders X X X Ranckt eria X.. X X X X z -- San Bernardino X X X X X X Red Hill C.C.Dr. X, *Inciudes landscaping and irrigation meter CA s J -2- 'X 4. P s� ~-to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, _ iha -ll be paid apd an_ encroachment , permit shall be obtained from then City Engineer's Office, in addition to any oher - -- permits required. X S. Street improvement plans shall be P r, �P ared" b Y ; ,a Registered Civil Engineer "and approved by the.!{iy.. Engineer prior._ to issuance of an encroachment p_rf?'it. G. Developer shall coordinate, and where.: necessary, ,gay for the relocation of any power pules or other existing public ,;utilities as-necessary. X 7. Eatisting lines of 12KV or less fronting the property shall" be undergrounded. r X 8. Install appropriate street name signs, traffic control signs, striping and markings with locations and types - approved by the City Engineer. ^ X 9 Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the,• Southern California Edison Comoany and the Cnty of Rao,cho Cucamonga. Lights shall b� pn decorative poles with underground'service. ;` X 10. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to and approved by the,, .anni)�g Division Prior to the issuance of building permit, X lY. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross 'sidewalks. Undersidewaik drains.shaIV be installed to elIt' standards, D. Orainane and Flood Control X Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall, be required and shall he delineated or noticed on the final map. 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and di1posal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas, 8. The following storm drain shalt be' installed. to the satisfact n of the City Engineer 4. Prior t� recordation of the map, a hydrologic and drainage study for the project shall be submitted to the City Engineer for reviewr 'A drainage ? detention basis per City Standards s4411 'be constructed to detain increased runoff , $ fM« P E_ Gradin X 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with -the AML Uniform Building Code, City Grading, Standards and accepted grading practices. The , final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance wi�'th the approved conceptual grading plan. X 2. A sails' re`ort shall he P- prepared by engineer . ,qualified- licensed by t,ie State of California to perform such work prior �'bu4lding` to issuance cf permit. ' S. A eolo ica�(1 g g r Ta be. prepared by a qualified enginee' �Mlr'11�1 or geologis and suted at the, time of application or grading plan cheG�, 4. The final grading pl ;,li be subject to review and approval by ,he` m.ding Committee And shall be completed prior to recordatio�i of the final subdivision map or issuance of j .building permit whichever comes first. X 5. Final grading plans for each parcel are tg be submitted he Building and.Safety Division for approval prior to issuan t building permit. E. General :Requirements and A&Kovals 1 r� X 1. Permits from other Agencies will be required as follows: CalTrans for San gernardino County Flood Control District X Cucamonga County Water District for sewer and water. f X- San Bernardino County Dust Abatement (required priO, to issuance of a grading permit) _ b'iher � 2.' A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restritt' ions (C.C. &R.s�, w approved by the City Attorney is required prior to recorda°tTon- of the map. X 3. Provide all utility services to each lot including sewerage, water, electric power, gas and telephone prior to street constructon. X 4. ` Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards, A letter of acceptance is required. 5. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions =— = -- from CaiTrans /San Bernardino County Flood Contr_aI District. -" It 6. Approvals have not been secured °from ill utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval Of the final mag will be subject to any requirements that may be received from then. ;b X_ 7. The Iiling of the tentative map or approval of same dues not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity wi11 be available--at ?L the time building permits,are requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will be asked to certify the mailability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. 8. Loral and Plaster Planned, Traits shall .,he provided in accordance with the Trail Plan. A detailed trail plan indicating widths, maximum elopes, physical- conditions, fencing and weed control — in accordance with City trail standards, shalt be, submitted td and approved by the City Planner prior to recordatic; for and /or prior to building permit 3 a'.a ce for 3 9. Prior. recording, deposit shall be posted with the city" coverir� estis -aMd cost of apportioning the assessments under A ss�rit District 82-1- among the newly created parcels. �D, ` X 10. At ther�'� e . —;dial maw submittal, the following shall be submitt�� Keport, traverse calculations (sheets), ctitaies tt,z,corde aps and deeds used as 'reference and /or showing, �lo }ginal 1.nd division, tie notes and bench .marks referent X il. Only one c& s point (driveway) will be allowed on eve Avenue, therefore, a reciprocal access easement for the be .its , of both parcels shall „be noticed on the Final Man or ',S. otherwise approved , by the City Engineer, ST- me -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONtA LLOYD B. HUBBS, CITY ENGINEER 3 bye ° -5- Jam_ L CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMCNGA O O F $ Z DATE:. March 13 1985 tis77 TO: Planning 'Comr,assior(L FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician \ SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSM547]AND PARCEL MAP 9020 - 'SGHrU - division of 16.9 acres of land !i,to 4 parcels in the General Induriai Area located on the south sid" of 7th Street, east of Archj�d Avenue ?PN 209- 211 -21 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of Parcel Map, C B. Purpose To creat?i4 parcels. C. Location: South side of 'tth Street, east of Mchibaid Avenue. D. Parcel Size:: Parcel 1 - 5.4 acres Parcel 2 - 3.9 acres Parcel 3 4.6 acres k Parcel 4 - 3.0 acres Total 6� 9 acres E. Existing Zoning: General Industrial (subarea 5). F. Existing Land Use: Existing Industrial building on Parcel -'1: -- Pa��ceis `, 3 and 4 are vacant, G. Surrounding Land Use: North - Vacant, South - Existing General Industrial, East - Vacant. West - Vacant. �� II H. Surrou ding General Plan and Development Code Designations: North General Industrial subarea No. 5 South General Industrial (subarea No. 5), 1111 East - `mineral Industrial (subarea No. 5). West - General Industrial:(subarea.No. 3). I. Site Characteristics: The site slopes approximately 1% i," southerly directiott. There are .five (5) sihall buildings constructed for'Commercial use on Parcel No. 1, \ "-e remainder of the site is vacant. ra _ ITEM F :q PLANNIJ4 COM�JSSIO' STAFF REPORT , Zz Envir 6 = --fsat Assessment and Parcel Map 9020 March 13, 1985 Page Z lI. ANALYSIS, Parcel 1 will contain 5 existing commercial buildings. Parcel 2 will contain one existing commercial building and two additional warehouse buildings Which 'were approved by'the Planning Commission on July 12, 1984 as OR 84 -13: No Plans have been received for the development of Parcels 3 or 4. However, a large commercial building was shown on the)DR 84«- 18- master plan in the area of Parcel No. 3. Reciprocal access and draina �sements are required for the parcels. The improvements for Archibald enue froAfmq Parcel ha., 1 are existing. In order to provide impro lor public access to each parcel, 7th Street shall be„ improved (half wi ) from Archibald Avenue to the westerly property line of Parcel 3, a requirement of the Parcel Trap. The remainder of 7th Street frontinarcel No. 3 will be improved upon I development of Parcel No. 3. t IIL ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Also attached your review and consideration is Part,-.j of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has / completed Part iI of the Initial Study the environmental checklist, and '\ / has conducted a field investigation tlpon'completion and review of the Initial Study `and field investigations Staff found no adverse ;mpacts on 1 the environment as a result of the proposed subdivision. IV. CORRESPONDENCE; Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper L Posting at the site has also been completed. V. RECQMM£NDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt the " attached rHOT'ution conditionally+ approving Tentative Parcel Map 9020 and authorizing #.,fie issuance of a Negative Declaration. t Respectfully submitted L H.i3; lea I Attachments Vicinity Map Parcel Map. ; 7 Master Plan Resolut 6n City Engneerts Report' Initial Study i L� 0 - i� 11 On- ff"., kyl rro�� Y i flip` , yR� "a 4 i3`rf -.a ,v 1 ti 4 iz- lz me Q J3 WN ,t r V l fir• _ � � �: t jYA9�4 it ! h I I_ `tn , )t a ENVIR RE VIE`CV 01-� 4 APPLIC ;A.TIOX 1977DY PART I� GENERAL J; For al l'proje'ots requiring environmental'�:eview this form must be completed and submitted to,'the DeJ'6lopment Revie�t Committee through the department where . the project application is made. Upnn receipt of this application, the Planning Division staff wilt prepare Part,Il of the, Initial Study and make recommendations to Planning Commission. The Planning Comkission will make one of three determinations: (1) The project will helve .environmental impact v asignificant p and a =Negative Declaration will be ri'�ed Elie Project will have a signifi cant, ,envirorunental impact and are Environmental Impact,-Report, will be prepared,` dr i „ Art additional infgrmation report should be supplied by the applttan't giving`furt' 'Proposed project, ier information gncerning the // 11 ' Date Filed: ` f Project Title:__�� /aClJ % / /3tJ57Glfj' Applicant's Nar,•Address,rnelephone• GLS�tf ENE � r Hn7b C, ?_ f7V_ � Name, Address, Teleph me of _erson To Be Contacted Concerni,�% this Project: AyE ,dAJ f39 A ;aalzr_��. Z, _ ` Location of Project o,srzl ASi_ (�Qy�/L pz 2GI� ✓�= aGt� ,il Assessorts Parcel No.: Z09> ZI /— - List other permits necessary from local, regional. state and federal agencies and the agency issuing such permits: fT f PRd1Ft`i' DESCRTPTIdN Proposed Use or proposed rorvct' Acreage of project area and square footage of existisgl`and proposed buildings., if any: /6.9 A �•� _ (/!{J /Z� 7itJ l:.r'�fiUGS ;✓r'i+�� Til}r✓ �Z �o. ri�G}i +SF Describe the environmental n ti_ n4 of the project site including info'r ation on topogr-V soil , stab.iT�rty, plants (tre'es) l ;nd an.ima%, any cultural, historicaY or scenic aspects, land ,=_ise of surroundingl� properties, and-the description_, of any existing .structures and their "use (attach necessary sheets )"—lg� -?:2'z -ter rr= �%_S c vr� :.-- I4- 7",rfc. Srar>z -t�/� �� ?I <.••crr�! /7 f/s7� �1`r� �T l Sr 2�zc= c 1 c / 2 try c i1 w FI GL'ffTc�iZ GLtic -z - ,13a,��-�rz��- , S_4if�G7CJ>tJli �•�t /.'(.j �. =7�,s /�i J %Gc= -%l`4�J+i a ..! 1q�/ZG —r e7G�.t� zf Yil � 511�'gi.!_ +��.•rXZ�XL'�e:!/� -f GL�1X�,� /�C -/l ,r is the project part of a larger �praject, one of a series of cumulative' actions., which although individually small, may as a whole have significant. environmental impact." ..A,1 = C x AIL 't iIS PRQdF�S • 1 °�S LO iI 1. Create a substantial grange in ground 6ontoursi 2. Create a substantial orange in existing noise of produce ti vibration or glare? y 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal L1. services (police, fire, watery sewage, etc..)? 4. Create changes in'jtne existing aW- designatlons? Zoning br General Pl _ - 5. Remove any existing trees? How many7��Y 5. create the need for use or Ceisposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammablesor explosives? o _ Explanation of any YES answers above (attach additional sheets if necessary)-. I'I i - ` I - P '77,j 7. Wil Estimate wil ,,the Wosntof §ewage and solid waste materials,,-this project I generate daily:. I D c f'Sn1G i $. Estimate the number of auto and truck trips generated daily by t$- -- S _. pro; ect: 2 55v . 9. Estimate the amount of grading (cutting and fOling) required for this`' project, in cubic yards: 10. If the project involves the construction ot�Presidential units, campleteiU, - -a_ the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and -information required for`°"this initial evaluation tL) the best of my abii'ty, and that th;21-- facts, stat- Wents, ' and information presented are true andl'correct to the best of my knowledge aqd belief. I further Wderstand that additional i�tforraation i be submitted before an adequate, = evaluation can be S' b� thequ red t+ Division. ! dad y�the arming bite: 17' Z4' ,A5, Signature � v °t s RESOOTION NO, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER X020 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO LOCATED ON' THE ,SOUTH SIDE OF 7TH STREET, WEST SyiO /GF ARCHIBALD AVENUE t WHEF':"'�L, Tentative Pfrcel Map Number 9020, submitted by Leland Scheu and corcsisting of 4 parcels, located on the south, side of 7th Street, west side of Archibald Avenue, being a' division of a portion of Lot 12, Section 14, Township 1 South, Range 7 West, as recorded, in Book 4, Page 9, San Bernardino County, State of California; and _ V WHEREAS; on December ,28, 1984, a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above- described Tentative Map;; -:and WHEREAS, on March 13, 1985, the Planning Conzoission held a,duT.v advertised public hearing, for the above- described map. f NnF,'THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNi,G COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS• ''SECTION If That the following findi s,have� been made. 1. That the map's consistent with "the General Plan. 2. TIVJ the' improvement of the proposed subdivision is corisistent with the General Plait 3. That the site is physically suitable fer the proposed dev4lopment. 4. That the proposed subdivision and imurovements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on aputtinit property. _ SECTION 2: Than this project will not c' reate significant adver "se environmental impacts and a Negative Declaration is issued on March 13, 1985: SECTION 3: That Tentative Parceii{ap No. 9020 is approved satb;iect to the recomrende onditions of Approval pertaining thereto, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF MARCH, 1985. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: - Dennis L. Stout, C.airman j :r - �: v CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA "= litCOWNDED XONDITION5 OF APPROVAL LOCATION: South side of 7th StrQ�t, west TENTATIVE PARCEL OAP NQ ,:9024 side of Are !bald Avenue DATE FILED, December 28, "1984 _ r LEGAL DESC &PTION: A po rtion or Lot 12 ILA NUMBER OF LOTS- 4' Section 1 S„ R, 7 W. as recorded 't`'n GROSS ACREAGE: Book 4, Pare 9, San Bernardino Count tate of California ASSESSOR PARCEL N0: 209 - 211 -21 ' S . DEVELOPER OWNER ENGINEER' %SURVEYOR Leland Scheu SAME - �.-- -� Adkan Engineers _ 297 E., Stowell 68'9 Air,ort Dr, Ste 302 �� UpTand, CA 91786 'Riverside, CA 92504 Improvement and dedication requirements in accordance with Titl'1 16 of the Municipal Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga include, but may n be .limited to, the following: A. Dedications and 'Vehicular Access 1. Dedications shall be made of all interior street rights-of-way and 6311 necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. 1P x 2. 1Iedication shall be made of the f=ollowing rights- of- wa on the following streets (measured from street centerline); < 5t7 total feet on Archiba'14 Avenue ` -•- 27 feet on 7th Street on X 3. Corner° property line radius will be required per C t Standards. y �_ of c 4. All'-rights of vehicular ingress and''egress'shajl be dedicated as follows: X 5. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreement s enuring access to all parcels and saint maintenance of., all comgmem' of roads, drives or parking areas -shall be pravidadi by C� &ft and shall be recorded ccncarrent with the map.; a w I' 5l X 6• All existing easements Tying within future right -of -way are to be quitclaimed or delineated 'un the t map per City Engineer's requirements. AL X 7. Easements,for sidewalk for ,public use shall be dedicated o the Gity where sidevralks meander through private property. S. Street Impravemeiets Pursuant to the ,City of Ranch fucamzlftga Municipal C fEti. litre 16, SeA-10 n t' 16.36.120, a subdivider may entef^If"nto an agreement- and post security with the City guaranteeing the required canstructiorvrior to reco�datiorf of the map i�id /or building permit - issuance. k r 1.__Aonstruct full street improvements including; but net Timited�� - - to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, Sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street ;lights on all interior streets. _ X A minim= of 26 -fiaot wide pavement within.,a 46-fbot wide dedicated right -of -way shall be constructed for ail` halt- section streets: X 3. Construct the following missing improvements for 7th Streets Prior to recordation for ortion from ArchillaUn Ave. to: the nest property line of Parcel 3 Prior to kulidhng permit, issuance for, portion frontinu Rarcel . Curb &„ A.C. Side —Drive Street Sheet A.C, Median Street Name Gutter Pvmt. Walk AoAr. 'Trees L jverTay Island* ,s Other 7th Street X X\� X _X X X *Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter _ X 4. Prior -to any work being performed in the public right- of -wi;r fees shall b? paid and an encr'pAfiment permit shall be obtjfnec( from the City Engineers 0 , ce, in addition to any other permits required. X S. Street improFemerft plans shal'1 „be prepared by a Registered = Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. J 6. Developer shaT r cood�ldinate, and where necessary, relocation of an Y. pY for the T�/ Power ; pales or other exi,s'4zng .public utilities as necessary. J X 7. Existing lines of V_KV or less fronting the property shaTl be ' undergrounded. r -2- k A �?Yi' X R Install appropHate street' - +lane signs, traffic, control signs,,, 7/ �1 striping and Qntrkings with locations and t ypgs approved byth'e City Engineer: : X _ 9. Street light•locations, as required, are i0 he approved by the� } Souther,: California Edison Company and t)e City Ranchd` Cucamonga. Lights shall on decorative poles witfij ,be underground service. X 10. Landscape 'and irrigation pans shall be submitted to and approved by the Ptanhing Division prior to the issuance of building permit. X 11. Concentrated , drainage flows shall not Cross sidewalks. Undersid l`k drains shall be installed to City Standards. C_ IgLety ' X 1. Surety` shal4 le'.posted and an agreeme„gt executed to the satisfaction. 'of the pity Engineer, and City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the -public improvements prior to recording for portion ef`7th Street from Archibald Avenue to westerly property line of Parcel! 3 and/or prior to building permit issuance for a of 7th Street fronting Parcel 3. 2. A Tien agreement must be executed prior to recording of the"' map ` for the following. 3. Surety shall be ' -' posed and an agreement executed, gaa nteeirtg completion of all on -site drainage facilites necessary f�` dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Buiiding and Safety Divisors prior to recording for and/or prior,; to issuance of building permit nor D. Drainage and Flood Contrmt ° X 1. / Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shar?l7 ;& required and shall be deii,neated or noticed on the final map,. , X 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering he gfr 9 Property. from adjacent areas. 3. The following storm drain shall be installed 'to, the satisfaction of the City 'Engineer X 4. Prior to recordation of the map, a hydrologic and- drainaga study for the project shall be submitted to the City Engineer for •review. _ l B. A drainage detention bar-in (30r City Sfand rd's shalt constructed to detain increased' unoff i..< s E_ IELdinj GradiV4/9 the subject prcperty shall b! in accordance with the* Unifom Building Ct City Grtding Standards and accepted' grading practices- The final grading plan shall be in, substantial conformance with the ap proved conceptual grading plan. X A soi`14� report shall be prepared by t-' 2. qualified eagii&r licensecVy the State of Calillom.ia to perform such work prior to issu6ue of building permit—, tv 3. A geological report shall be prepared y,�a qualified engineer or geologist and- submitted At -the tf Of application or grading'plaft check. 4. The final gram4n Plan shall be subject,to review and approval by the I Grading',Comm-ittqe and shall be complete d prior to recordatifih of the final subdivision 'or map issuance ov building pernit whichever comes,_'first. x 5. Final grading plans for each parcel Are to be submitted, to the Building. and I Safety Divisio n for approval prior,,to issuance of building permit. F. General qequireamt—, and A Val's x I. Permits, TrOA other agencIes, will be required as follows; J= GalTrans for San Bernardino Minty F.' d Con ol District X Cucamonga County Water Di,,�t�ict for sewer 14—i ad water San Bernardino county Dust Abatement (required prior to issvance of a grading permit) Other x 2- A COPY of the Covenants, Conditions and Res trI ct (C'.C.&4LsJ approved by the-Zity Aftorney is required priv' +0 recorda" Ml�_ af the map. x 3. Provi,'"ll utilit. --�kervices to each lot includiCS sewerage, wat,er�'i �Iectric v Powel,`�., gas and telephone, prior to ,,street C, str'u-cton. 4. Sanitary sewer and water systems sliall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A letter of ac, M�ptan required. Ce Is fi= This subdivision shall be subject to, conditions of .approval AI _from CaTCransjSarr Bernardino ,:County ,E; food Control 0i�t ..app X 6, - " Approvals Have not been secured from all ut litres and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements -that may be ,deceived from them. ' X_ 7. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that sewer eatr�ent capacity wit]' be available" at the ,-time build' g Fermi are requested When b,�ld�n '�� q' gi S permits are requested, the Gu monga County water District will be asked to certify the a ailability of capacity. Rermits will not be issued unless sal certification is received it} writing. 1; 8, Lo I and � after P1zm Trails shall be provided in ,�� dance r w� the rail Plan.. A detailed trail plan ndicat `r widths, �, , I?cfX2rnu�r! s ees, physical conditions, fencing' and weed gcontrol> in accorda�rce with City trail standards, shall be submittsc to and approved by the !City Planner ' priof to reci}fatLtn for _ ^� andlar� Or to building permit v issuance for _ l 4. Prior to rdcording, a ;deposit shall be pos with the\ City covering the estimated cost of apgortion1 $he assessments �T under Assessment District 82-•1 among th&,neW, y eated parfels. " F X 10. At the time of final map submittal, the f lowinig shall be f submitted: Title Repor, tretRerse calc6 atioms (sbeets), copies of recorded maps, € deeds used as reference and /or `l showing original land �divisicti i 1, , e notes and bench ,marks referenced.. x - 11. Ali offer of dedication for a 12' wide drainage easement al0a the east alid south boundaries of the parcel: map shall be made to the City for future drriiinage from 7th Street. k r t• CITY OF RA xwa CUCAM LLOYD B: - quBBS, CIty I.tlEER U by:° 4- � T ' k C_ ---- -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCANiONGA �t An rp STAFF REPORT V I e a a r O C Ems - G) 197 DATE: March 13, 1985 TO: Chairman and Mekabers of the Flannibg Cwmission FROM: Rick Oo6z, City manner BY: Curt Johnston,,-Associate Planer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AN4i TENTATIVE TRACT 12673 - Y7RN PROPERTIES - The ueveloparent of 402 apartment units on 2 net acres of land within the Terra Vista. Planned Community, designated Medium Residential (4 -14 datac), located at the northeast corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway APN 1077- 091 -02, 06 and 107,1;'- 421.04, 06. I« PROJECT AND SITE DESCRITPION. A. Action Requested: Approval of a sub- division map, site pain, wilding elevations and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Purr^Se: Development of 402 apartment units, C. Location: Northeast corner of Church Street and Terr >s Vista 1 Parkway. D. Parcel Sizes 20.05 net acres. E. Project Density: 19.6 dwelling units per acre. +•7~ F. Current Land Use: Designations Medium High Residential 4 dutac G. Ex st ng Land Uses Vacant /vineyard � H. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North Vacant;/vineyard, Terra Vista Planned Community, future junior high school site. South ' - Vacant /vineyard, Terra Vista Planned Community, L designated Office Park, High Residential (24 -30 ITEM O vI Planning Commission.Staff Report Tentative Tract 12673 - Western Page 2 - Q East` - Vacaativineyard, Terra Vista Planned. Community, designated future park site and High Residential (24 -30 do/ac) ate;,`: - Vacant /vineyard, Terra Vista Manned Community, designated Medium Residential (4 -14 du/ac), TT 12319 recently approved. 1. Terra vista. Planned Community Designations: Protect Site - Medium Residential (4 -14 du/ac) North - Future junior high school site. South - Office Park, High Residential (24 -30 dulac). East - Future park site, High Residential (24 -30 du/ac). West - Medium Residential (4.14 du/ac). J. Site Characteristics: The project site is currently vacant and slopes southward at approximately 2 to 3% grade. No structures or significant vegetation exists on the property, I1. ANALYSISt A. General: The site plan divides the ,project into two separate areas; family apartments to the north and adult apartments to the south. The adult apartments are stacked flats, whereas the family project cr ists of townhomes and stacked flat,s. The architecture of t�. adult apartments is nearly iden� -�Al to Tentative Tract 12402, recently completed at the northeast J corner of Terra vista .Parkway and Spruce Avenue. ,The townhome architecture is identical to Tentative Tract X43.'s currently under construction at the southeast corner of Tei�a Vista Parkway and Spruce. H. Design Review Committeet The Resign Review Committee wa4.,..:v initially concerned with the architecture of this project because together - with the two .approved projects, approximately 830 units would have similar designs. The `= applicant, however, agreed tp revisions to the roof structure and side elevations, and 'a revised color pellete. in addition, concrete. the shake roofing (versus composition). will be provided indicated on the building material sample board to be available for review at the meeting. Other changes as requested by the Committee included revisions to the unit plotting along Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway, additional wrought iron fencing alone' the future school and park site, upgraded carport designs with heavy beams and lattice work where visible from public view, and texturixed pavement at the project entries. Revised plans per the Committees request are indicated on the attadhed €a exhibits. n, plan: t„ ig COarnission Staff Report Tentative T�', ct 12673 Western Page 3 C. 940ronmentai As4essment: Fart T of the Initial ",lady Eras been completed by the applicant. Staff has completed the environmental checklist and found no significant adverse environmental imparts as a result Of this project. If the Commission concurs with this finding, issuance of a Negative Declaration Mould be appropriate. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The subject prop,,tyt is adequate in size and shape to acC.ommodat2 the proposed units. The proposed subdivision, detailed site plan, and arch,tectural elevations in conjunction with the Conditions of Approval arm consistent ;With the Terra. Vista planned Community' and the General PXAg,-`� ,e project will not be.. detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environmental impacts. ii`}}� IV. CORRESFONDEME: This ita� has been adv t y er ised as a public hearing in The t1ai` -k-e orl n$yspaper,r and notices were sent to property 1 owners.., within fl feet of the subject site, To date, no corresC deuce has been received either for or against this project.;, V. RECOMMENDATION. Staff re&),*end: that the Planning Commission approve the subject tract orot: adoption .: of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Neva +,i�ie Oeclar.;tion. Iles fitfully itted, 1 is �� < it ner Attachments: Exhibit "B�r eExhibit q8a - Location Map - Area Development Plan xhibit C - 7:btative Tract Map ' Exhibit "D'- - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit OE* - Grading plan Exhibit "F" Conceptual landscape plan '{ Exhibit duilding Elevations 3 Exhibit "H" - Carport Elevations r Initial Study, Part II Resolution of Approvai with Conditions u r v r: i ,tdCi M Terra Osta M N _ U tm ! /f UA m LM aarr�. orn w�w.n M _ Mri *uew.�a�asaeoyy.rer,o iLA Lu LM Im RC wwawacmrm�a�. - _ ''I tj+ y . � • C= A LM L IMVCY.I�IMWiilfR�4Y :. 4 Y., ,t ��smw�aa.OniS. 11j ru RC w i, ' � 1 • �' � 3p{ fir» � .xan � # pp ' tt0 nny f CC ti .,.Y..• ':d ,/. ~ MAC Rp mullBoa (D FIGURE Irbr Teffa Vista Plan � cb t� j URLH .� CI a Y OF �Tr: RANCHO CLTCAMOi rA. T - -_ PL��IVSSiI - fE,YHTI3IT.� - 1 UY A., OHM ��%'✓l i L a ja a r fir'` �.�.• 1 'mTy,. -AZi I 'Awl. �..a•�r... s . n t w � �� ^T`4 1� Ilali!!99 �ia�as \ Mtit ;� {�}j� •' H[:n ]77 M �� i' t � as ♦ `nt \ yy�: L3GtaQ t�GUf��i` C�In AHDA 14' 4z\70nn i wDR3"f CITY OF ITENI- PLANII'G llIZ'ISiQi EXHIBIT =._ .�-'e-4�T'ALE =. r. i �ROIr�g �dL�NIQ4fIQI� f c 1IORTM CIT OF Ali- Jvi�'�d1i TITS PU6.l'�NINIG DTitI;SQN CITY of RANCHO cuckxoNG y BART lI - INITIAL STUDY. MMRONMM.AL CFECK=ST DATE: s APPLICANT: FILING DATE: - oa NUMBER: PROJECT: ' .try; =.� �� ;^ 'x•�s- '- PROJECT LOCATION: 2. EHViRONMEBTAL iMPACTS f III (Explanation of all "yes" and 'maybe' answers )?r sheets). required t.R attached r YES HAYBE No j 1. Soils and S; _ -_Vill the proposal have signiT can L tb -¢ ^ a. Unstable ground Conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? b. Disruptions„ displacements, compaction or burial, of the soil? C. Change g in topography or �uuad surface e contour interva?s? d. The destruction, covering or modification Of any unique geologic or physical futures? e. Any potential increase in wind or water j erosion; of soils, affec-ting either on or off =- site c9nditons? f. C.hanges:in erosion siltation, or deposition ?, S. Exposure of people or prope�t to a.+nl:git hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, = d- r slides, ground failure, o;r similar hazards? t' h. An increase in the r&'te of.extraction and /or, use of any mineral resources L' RPdrolaft- will the pro?dsa: have significant results in; r Page 2 v YES MYBE NO a. Changes in enrregts, or the cor 'rse of direction of flowing str aws, rivers, or ephemeral stream channels? b. Changes in absorption rates, drai ��. e patterns, or fist z��e and amount of surfac grater runoff? fJ ' Vl c. Alterations to the course or low of flood �, waters? d. Change in the �movnt of surface w '-- rer it any ` r body of water? e, -. Discharge into Corfaca graters, or any alteratioz, of` surface waster quality ?., f. Alteratio- of grorndvater ebaracteVI")tics? g Change in se quantity of groundwaters, either through direct addirlons or with- . drawals, or through !Mteyfereuce with an aquifer? Quality? Quavtity? - ts. reduction ist the ao'ant of seater other- LTA• a available f_ or Pus water supplies? r 3. Lure ou,�eogle ar pro;,,I r to ,rater re;iated hazardg such as Moding or seiches? E 3. Air Quality; will tat yigossl have significant results in: _. A. Constant ar •peiiodic .fxsfssions from mobile or indirect sources? Stationary sue,- 'es? b. Dererioration of ;- anent stir quality and or interference with; he attaiw;�,tm,t of woNlicable air quality standards? C. Alteration of local or regit nal. cLlmatic conditions, affecting emav .kmt, voisture or temperature? -- k. Biota Tlora. 'Will the propssoal bAIL,•significant results Q. Change in the charactrxl# ti&k of w�rc�es, lnc; -Iding diversity, distribution. or der 1 �� .� of pleuts� ~� G / A 3 rn. Yu$ tare I +/ Or essdaVW0+,! i ofplaat ` F Pa!-A, YES:`?AYSE Nli c. Introduction o£ nev or disrip'ti e:suecies'df, �. Plants into an area? d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural � production? Fauna. Vii the proposal have significant r u =ts ins Ch -'rge in tIae characteristics of species, iuclu4irtg diversity, distributkP ov numbers Of aa} . speai,es of animals? b. Reduc',ion of 'the` hums ers of any unique, rare c. 3�:e-ndangered �speries of animals?' ; 'r C. Introt�uctioii' of arcs or disrugtive species of , / I aniak3° wn, 4_.au area, or result is a Carrier to the migration or movement 'cif ranimas3? d. Detel `3 ration or aemoval of existing fish or - J r*i3:diife habitat? , Flo a atian. *dill the Proposal have Agru.ficant a. �ti11 the` proposal alter the locatiast, d :ratsi f j bution, density,;3ivarsi- -y, or grogth rate a� t3�, human v an 'area? of ? i . b. Will the proposal affect existing huusinrj,,or "I create a deman& orr zddia.onal housings ' E, 9a� �s =Eco_nomic Factors- Will the proposal have si.g- ficanr r^n;;Its ins a. Change It locat of tegionk socio- economic characteristics= Ynrlading econott:. -.`ax commexc:Lal diversity, tax rate„ aa� •property values? b. Will project costs be equitably distributed among project bertefiriartYs, ,re., buyers, tax p, -yerz or project users 7. Land Use and ?Tannin Coasideratians. Will-the J proposal ;ave itignificant resulta in? o . a. A StLbEtaalt b1a 'te =at Dn O'I the present or - P14aned land ud` of au urea? I A conflict with�"' y des;.,,rnurions, of jectiv s, _ SOIicies, ce ado ed plans of any,gvernmetitai entities? 7 c, d iett ; n the gUiaity or .- Vantity of - e :Iut9.r &,cGasumptivo, or non`co.;sumgtive zacrea :��[I og�azttinfties?- - � _ _�` y r t' Page 4 YES MAYBE NO S' Transvnrtation, . Will the pro ? osal have s;Cg'nifica7.6 ?esults in: a. Generation o!; substantial additional vehicular ' b. Effer >ts'an exiseing,9,5�treets, or demand fa new street constrtittion? c. )ffeats on existing parking, facilitieq, or demand for *.ew parking.? d. Substantial Impact upin existing transporter d Lion systems? e. Alteration to present patterns of circula- :� > tion or mo•,�ement of people aad' /,isr goods? �ki f. AlteVitians ta=ar cE�cts on present and; Potent4,al vmter- h:irne rail, mass transit or air'trafficT -$• Increases in r- .affic hazards to motor vehicies, bieyc7.ists tor padestrians? .' 9. Cultural Resources. Will'the proposal ire significant results in: ��. Adisturbance to the integrity Q w. puln�icaX, °paleontological, an{oor histori) 1eE6urces? -- 16 Health, Safaty, and Nuisance Factors ,r Will the proposal have significant wesults in: a. Cre.ation ;:Of any h,� th haza rd'cr potentttl health r, iazard? b. Facpo�4 _� u i people to psatantial `health hazards? c. A risk of release Cf hazardous si:'ostinces`h the event of an accident? d. An increase In the n-se0er of - ndividuaSs ox species of vector or pathenogenic 0 � organitims or the exposure of people Co such carg =r,ism:': - e., Yncrr!asei,-a E-_;isting noise leti;ls? ; pcoP to potentially dangv:ous � Aa7 ,! 8 re f object ( onabli - odors? R ;i t< 'Ast ltrxee a li&h - ror glare? y Page 5 s YES s MAYBF� NO 11. Aesthetics. cs. Wilz tI�e /,proposal have significant results in: ~� a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic i vista or, view? b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site? �f c. .A conflict with the objective of 4es3gnatei, or potential seer..ic corridors? 12. Utilities and rubblic_Servics« 'dill the r•roposal -UWe a significant— for 3e." �ystem- .�. or alterations to th followi` g: a. Electric power: " o. Natural or packaged gas? ca COML& ications systems ?,' J/ d. Wate= u�1y? e. Waster fate r facilities?, v £. Flood cont?1101 structures? g. Solid waste faFiiities? h. Fire prov-,ct�bn? I. Police protection? J. szhools? k, parks or other recrtat dal facilities?,, 1. Maintenantc, cef public 'fa ;Olities, -J eluding s aoais and V,,(, sod controZ:..� :ii tir ? m. Othsr, 13. E Scarce , +` is b�� Win the � osal o ;! have significant. rei. �'�' �� p ,I a. Use of subttaatiaj ,;r rxcess ve fue or energy? b. Substantial incre4ie in demand up n existing i sources of tnera�y? An Increase in,,the demand frr cV�velo�mant of new sources of..enexgy? _ oy r'U d An increase or gterpetraCion o the consum'Itiot 'of non renewabla fprms of energy, wtnn i asOle 1renewable spurt s of energy ax e available? w ! Page G , s �7 YES M&YBE NO A e. Substantial depLtion of any* panrexsewable or scarce nat.rad, resource? .A 14. Mandatory Finditi� n Significance. r �� d a:,.'Yloes the'Project0have the potential to dealade the quality of the envirotimentF substantially., reduce tire, habitat v, fish or wildlife species, cause a fish, -?j wildlife population to drop 'r below elf sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or anima?. community,`reduce . the number'---or restrict thy% range a or of rare m endangered plant: or animal or eliminate important exam pYes of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does ``the project Aava the potential to achi eve O short�iterm, to the dlsadvantuge of long- test, environmental goals? '(A wnort- terlli impd`ct oit the environment is one' which, occurs in ;a relatively ~^ brief, definit3xe period of time w ile long- { term impacts mill endure well into the future). t <, rte,. a. Does the project have impacts whicL are �indi4i3uaily limited, but cumulatively ble? (Cu consideramulatively considerable �J aieanA that the incremental effects of an `� \ individua3 project Are considerable 'When, viewed i xy in connection with the effects of fast projects, Li and Probable :future Projects). ,% f d. '�0bes the project hava envniroramental effect~ . _which will c€sulte substantial adverse effects on human be 44, either directly or indirectly? SI. DISCUSSION OF ENkA01M NTAL EVALUATION �(i. t.. , of affirmative answers ,,V . w the above questions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures). n zl _ 3 J,\ If 1 B P�'Y` Page gnat Pc�or� 7 Qu ip' III. DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: l I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect On the environment, and a NEGATIVE `C ,� � I.esRATIGN will he prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect _ on the environment, there will not,be a significant effect in this case because��the mitigation ensures f described on an attached sheet have bed► added to S e project;: A NEGATIVE -, DECLARATION WILL' BE PPIPAAED. (-- -� I find the proposed project MAY,ha a a''a gnif a t effect on the',' - envirnment, and an V'PIRONMEN rj c REPO equ red. Date 5ippature Title � U G - o - o a. v 0 v ;, y. - t a 17 t *t �. RESOLtlTION NO'-. t " A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY flF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 'CALIFORNIA.'. CnNDITIONALj'.1Y APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 1£573 I WHEREAS, Tentative'Ttract Map No. 12573, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Lewis Homes, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real „properly situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San drnardinq, State of Ca Z j forni a, described as the development of 44?•. ''on j _ -, apartment, Gwn.its 2o.5 net acr'is of land within the 'TeK-,a rlannej"C7. unl1ty� -� designated Medium ReOdential 4 -14 du /ac), located at the sort, east cornd�, of Church Street and Te?Vra Vista Parkway - APN 1077- 091 -02, 06 and-,1077- 4z1.k4, qG into lot, one rebularly came-before the Planning Cotmmission fur public fip.'Aring and,action on Mirch_13, 1985; and WHEREA ,the City PIanner has recommended approval oi'the Map subject' to all conditions, set forth in the Engineering- andt Planning Divisirr,,js reports; and y WHEREAS, the Planning Commission hai,.reat and' considered the Engineering and Planning Division`s .reports: and )ias-cdrsidered other/ evidence presented'at the public heavin0: AOW, THEREFORE, the Planning 11)Commissioa � of ° the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Gomsmission makes the fall owing findings 4o regard, to Tentative Tract No. 1c673 and the Map-thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the several Plan, JeYelopment Code, and specific' (b) The design or' improvemen.s'�-r ttp ten4ative� tract 1s t -- consistent with the General Plan, gevelopinent Code, and specific plans; 1 (c) the site is pftysically suitable for the type of =' develoW4,it, proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not lik &ly to pause substantial environmental car�dge and avoidable oy injury to humans aiid wildlife , their habitat; (e) The tentative' tract is not likely to cause serious -� public health problems; - -- � f , • Y {f} The., design of the fentative tract wilt not conflict with any easement acquired by thejrliublic at large, . -- � now of record;' fdr access through or use of the ' prorurty within the proposed subdivision. ' (g) That this ¢roject wiil�not create adverse impacts on ! the .environment and a Vegative,'Deciaration is issued. _.• attached SECT2DN 2: Tentative Tract Neap Ito. `' 12513, a copy of., which ',is hereto, is ,hereby approved subject to all of the ��jTowing and the conditions attached Standard Don�itionsc _Planning Division I. Texturized pavement, such as co at�d,.,ctamo6d- concrete, shall be provided. 2. All trash enclosures shall be- provided with overhead lattice ,work nr, similar shaded structure to 'the 'satisfaction of the City Plainer. 3. Final detail �:of the carports • staall b4 included O in 'the construction,, drawings fur review,and approval by the Planning Division. 4. All retaining wallslshall be conste ^ -,Cted of decorative block. S. �., Final design deta'l, of the alterr'aiing block Oal7-zand wrought, iron fence,'lncludfng a locking gate, shall" be included in the-11 } construction dra�iing, subject i:o the review''an approval by the - Plan" zing Division,: 1 6. Low level lighting'shail,b� provided in all open - space areas. Details shall bs provided in the constriaciion drawings. 7. All outdoor mailbox locations shall be provided-with solid overhead structure and appropriate lighting. Jiie final design Of ae-y f,ees>andiny structures shall.,be comparable with thE.. builA,V architactur1 add shall -be inclurfeI . in . the constru;\t ongal drawin s subject to the review and apnrovaT by the Plaft,'.�'n Divisiop. 8. Roof materkAl within the project shall be.fire retardant od, ' shake or_ till, \Shake. Actual arater!M sample shall be id i pd 'Plandkng to the Division for, reiiiew and approval before issuance of bu %ding permits, g, Drainage on the subject property to the south, shall be suIbject,', -' to review for accuracy of interim disposal i1hTi1 . <coGtneriy stree:t� are constructed. 1 . 10. Patna walls shall be provided for all townhouse' units. nesigtt details shall be included in the co'siruction'draw ng_. , subject to review and approval by the Planning: Division. 11. Construction details of the recreation'-' ecreation tuiI din gs (with sonar panels) and shade structures shall be included in the construction drawings, subject to review and approval 6,v the Planning Division. EA gineering Division 1. The applicant shall cortruct the following off -site access roadways, with minima ,,of 26 foot` wide AC Pavement within 40 feet'of dedication, aj Spruce Avenue and Terra ,jiistkle arkway from Rase Line Road to the site; ` bj Church Street from haven Avendt�\ to the site including a bridge across Beer Grecr'Channel. The cost of the bridge shall be credited towards the systems deYelopment fees for the Terra V =sfiaI Development„ 2. Median `openirng will not be permitted.. for the driveway connection to'Terra Vista Parkciay. The driveway shalt be ripht turn in and out only. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF MARCH, 1985. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUr_AMONGA ,i BY: 06nnis L. Stan t, Chairman ATTEST? _ Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I i"ck Gomez, Deputy :secretary of the Planning, of tip City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoin3 Reso;utian was duly, and c, regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plarnin8 Ccxission of fire City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of 'fte P�rinirigorission held on the 13th day of March, 1985, by the following:vote- to'witt" AYES: O1'�A4ISSIGNERSt NOES:i�55IONEtt��; i A113ENT 10!ttISSIONEf•x �\ HL a LN d4 V64dS.Y .G Cc,Oq q x9t� mb�r4tl b0�� If_ 6 EEimQ ^VL 4 6. amiL tl-pLmsVM .Ep . qLq... .0 q °�!a 4a+aa ' ` OVdd .nOV vi 41 W Y ugd V.y Y L V q i . 141 d ~ QLOt q ,.. -..-�- U a � Omg abb0r '4 y v. E!2 .� C - .��VN . w ` &O .� qY ai u uV GL i A 'w9 Ga� L°Lc� ,yi A*G Ha r �s 4 �r NVE a O M a0. 6 . ' YLra_ Zq � . iOL...F.b .LEW. �.� L F Cq. bq ' i .YN CT' • �d 4VW p.� X aV .C.p. � w.4 V �v d. 6dV rN x >:N v a aG�m c N.�� d 2 G na RO.o tlq 4. �is°+ua n'y".c ��aa Om amme''io Or ODU ��j q.VOgtY�r E`a =aLf ppE4u0� �'d. x` � °E4Ry,,.y. w�.. x : a us °o -LC °� '. •,- rjYa ma 3y�. -. .-.-` E4y �.�v. n.,��.wz.a asm.. ac.„GTS ec'a ^++ C �GCa ` tit q¢C Q AocE Nt <O^nai p�p..e� ' ~i yLY.r G Cv. .,06uwx a0.4Ha4r �6 CQ.uw TCC.v. '0'..�Slp GwmL uYR�T ��XS �Qr4.F OC�+�uC' G4gm _ w VNE O a°-. C'+V gp C x an�va °rvac c x .. + uAaaswEa Nd�� 4C yL a0" o &U- .1 °4 .- Cvr +C Vp Q G ..L °t- N xr d..3 Cowm Ft cAi dt �q oCG N t J p4 .du !FI� EAq. G ° F:E " a, a � ate' d �,d. c=•.. ,J t `"i Afz w co r,1 ........ , Say a pa v a Z ;Ny u wa++�'• a aGyCESI daa vd�66 ayq Z S t C dJv r ar ti v _ T 7A hl 'UP ?ahr J. I E ai - °8... .°.. =a icl Aatl t.� -,! f- P N LLO Y°tl E QMNLL °Mje Nqh Y.:3 L. tlN 4.GN 4. `'` �Q .5! G T��q L .IIt` .�. »0 yO` G'� Cq7 6a - I. x wa• CC1 p.V9 Y« ULOd pa ��UR a�qa 9Rtlw a \C b » iy X3°6 OpL V w�p4ML »MN=.' d0.�^ O od. »a II h �G_ x D L L q,� �• i.i N ° N U N? S ty�. .� •Dr`G „6 U �hG �U^ Stl4 .wr V.3`C; dYa Ly'WP' _ CDwN y '.'G,GENr•R0. q�.Q %yp'K' LL ` qs „C.Y� ta CEi�+,tlG �V FB rV w NU ST Eva dq 2 G v.O Y -- 0Coq �af0 3p .+ Q.�. MOOC ^y, G RYY RQ NFL tl�elp yy NLG 'aa��A^ .i..liii I� qy: tl00=,'fYJ � >L.r Q.G �NpX3 ' KgaC R rpC OO V.D 41, YRp atlLR OM. Cqu YrN 'Ox 6 .� 0.Q -c O 0:.� yri.Ci �Y 4 ETT. Q 6 pur ,qp ' EE� Q V L4. a Ey tSYVT Vtwr -. C V•J1daM = ... Y7vtlV hd .Ga ON q ar0 �C np _ `atl+ G ¢vaiu V� V/ w i3 Y.r..uw x <Q Dcw <.r » R Eu a-]S SD ^a n OC K�IItJ .C. ar+ »O +G.e.rm b Z pyd rP 0.+ d602cYL� a QOE KdQ R NCO <'•�® b' Otl'bOl p.-.G a� t wPx »60 d .qCi »L � SdE T„yi�y G^ YV Va tl t 'QC 1- .LCY�pn.�4+ v �9 �d �O! /- ✓� .. cn t GE° K d L a� � r_gOi.V. Gur Cm tl�Y °y.y ai*a 40Yt 1 qaV d� .. L i•oq Mac war q.- �.aQ LL. _ =Y» G� L�t C L=W Lq L V d 5s79 qQ oo N��i CUC CW �Y 40 r E° v Lna n`T `aoai I. «qP prey -,�V +. q x G` Y a C . 'q�3'� A' � KV .0 a Y aYy h?. L ^,.`✓ C C.r D � G�� 6~ h� q YR� i ar S�a CCp� Q uiM11 �b �q. 0p 0q•n. -. L's 6 0Cdpnn CtN�p.:'0�g0'R DLr hOa •� K Y CrWw +- G. N q AYtl 00 `I 4.p OT Y r U'Z vr� L+.” 'II tl :f RS..YO Ni�aa .^wtl h7 CU S Vp. :. U - d^ AfN OLO tltltl LU."a nC Z; Vq Q. 1-,c xa 'ir » s N. a O •rP < V 1.. q II tl u.J iGL .'i.w•^ r .rm D Pw.�[ G IV Vs Y Q VO:.L b V an C 6 4 vryVa L1t A.�b r�CV � pV ,p q4+�e yNmn� � 90V�.�d 'O �} OC"f? xC q Amil CO ^Nm b M Uy .. V b y4j 4bdLNU >r4..°.OL adi pb ry°UA_ M � Y 4h dw�i ?4 U C a aq O aAN .0 taNV_ NurG Vvb ..C.b ya t VM �'� 4J Z � Lam° gpbj ccr ^ m'... c .15 .. ,:?. US Lf N aMy Va�D AhwN CG. rrVi.lr. 24Li RL '�` , b+ad wdy O.°i yyr n`�� °r sy a� P�'u,+.': . �°.•. -,M E` Lrn r�.1 'O � v m Y a� L b.Y - a y, N L •q ff _ 1 Od FC.RA muUb -0.LM iY'Y� ff.4 qr�f.! u .Y OqA Ni C° N4 C:0 r1i v 4 ° E VSf.ZO b�� a?U p�w.r V�a3G 3 H p LNd SIR,,.. LL L v= m N ;;I.- N G rtl 6n 4 it GOy 'AO Cw NO AY. ON ~y.. gAd6b m 4 'b y%�p L�Vd QTt p� I) by'� C d'VU0.nK q,�y�TM ^�V. t1 V��'4C b. ^f-NMN R..q�Oa "Lm T�+L�J qd iC < L d N~y v ywu� yG'at eC RyO.a Y. ir1" w c .LY R1 SCx .n.L Vt�y,.p i. ..t � r bV .r A°.Ob Ly m�oarl V m � Vim... CG nowt CU- ` _ iK+flTNLN 'C q+'OIL 4V. 14. C'O O.N 1�N.6 Vf+ N N. 33� J{.B.C. �F +qC _ ¢ F QQC a�OE Oxt »S.tA aORO Cly C CT. °cc` w�R 2 u 3 �4N m c x Vomit 4�w. O •c C'rast.�7 �t M¢ aC AaOU. y,lt A V O V q 6 i'a pq; N Ld �T{TC Yawn V+VV.QV V LwS,R trV w L C bd yr _ UFS A A^ v r oaf^' �n h�wit�4 ot�a -`a q Nccw yS VVOR 4�0.� VPfi G �qn! NNE nM b CRC i� � C V6 LN � O °d 4tl1. -. CPi rnuV4 dK y�t y q � .Cqo._ $ c � ¢ .fir t.. ° w L u'� N �•-,� 1 L«m~p3 »C AU C �V S.� N .per S O m.V O1L rttr. Deb# £NM ?4 60f r- M ` HNE �� CF,a N 'Y �M b R .+R q ,,; a d: O r yy S!' L 4t' t •0 L V '� ff L V� b Y r ` 5� SrE% awc A2y �.+ wr y }a9,y dgad wy N...a V4 LV. Cam.4 Yj J zZ.-2- ? t <41N iy eN Cea <vL. s- orrt.rw � Q »aa +.+mNa¢s K+. �ti �Aw •L Nr- 'Sewo �=. N� I C �,l t z .. • ,.. R .�. y. �+- u arS Y� z b N v m p O1.u. l\ i E g 5 b Aa a�`.c'Si�o, LL a�J� NNd� �i J.0 U P N C ' V �i a0. O •✓•L R0. LXbN. � U �.r L_Y Yt - = a t •r S Y�aC '�JY< _ • � CL �I) Ly AY Ala. ry Q. F„i YOYh p�LtJA YA Od ^_ 6d PC ^� nd A i, ac Y•`ay EE qYW � ... Eo= aa y N Qx �d�llG i1 ^ �A by TRom cROlyd b =CY6 �.A' U� mow. ! �d tp li Lv V ^Epp t •LS °r^iLL A06aw > YY �� V n. iC V C� CI W V „S CO VY� rT hO ^ RV .bC• .� N�bW ud�yvb U006d� .0 �` NC b= OQ pY�Y ��O \ Wd C 6G .fib. �y M a e;0 b� @p' N caber w..•. 0 y °VC r� n dlN•s a. ^° 4 n(,V �; 2p °� 09�L LOS ...1 O O = A.A ti � D @Ow Gy.a b =• O ..A 211a.;2 - °- aoa a . w uv ; b o LWL .N ^ ^ M m a- vU„ 4 � �� 2�° a CCn4 •b y� =C u•� `, ,oA iv L EE pp i Y ry v �L b €$pr uBLa U. y� — OA a C"` VRYr -. b^OC VM ay4 a =` T. Y`+OT AyU III ^ ° a d i °• °c 3.v4 ° ° u = u c e a is ,( �.._.,,.- 5O QO b v 1 ELU M aO br q. y Z Q•A n S. erc ��0.� VIr tEA Y. b U w �6.~p. y'= b iY1 rLs. d L �. .Ebd A:2�. W db -b.... .J� Y. it NTC O y ^.° ��y ��£M1U b.... b'L •ys ',J r.. t' V a ` tl1 pL O> VLL d rC. A y F. ye°+onno �µbY ck l,1 ^b Up SY� {Gr �� .1 °Y +�lO n6Y� Y `Cypp ifp lLE1�i C.A,4 l} LC Y igg1G E'^_Y L ?E ..CCA ^'roA i yO'•i,✓V ,1 K6 O4 = LI YOi W¢X 6Y t'3.:I�4 � QY L. St Z:.2 e � i- s CC u Nrb R> d iq�a � � � a C.LV HA •c^ P h d1 N y � ff tIIy' i i `14Y ..rte. LAC. N'-A _�6Q I iT w•� _. -�... 3L 4. J~ w.d 3stL rurLL y�^''•w wry ` O � o R HM �9. byQ LV Ri6 A 'ti C�L �} u w ,neon K CO (1 u y-0 �✓ v< � i4 nq�� ptC. VY°Wpp xq t t Y V i 4Z �_!} r•^ Y� i + i+� aLL40L orb qit .,y "�.,. jr w ^T- '� -Q'+. i yC U.q Q'C V4b9.iF MaG v54 Nt�f- ° or "�� JJ[�dR Q -:.. ZaR �04- o` _o >.N 4y.� � r'SU "" Via'. «b_� Cf�SS4b • . +±.�¢ U4. :cw odt�GY ii C LG .r O YL p b a qqq { r m��i Y�Vb io9.ri �" <L4VCY tiNC yY.y ®+ u�'��a Vay� S�6y CLL L SFr b ay V d xY 1 40 C�LLtX,� _` p`^R�SICW q.N -Qi 1 Py R V Y�og `0 +alr"` �R C.Z4q'wf 'dam 3 V C.nwa0 O ._ �A. aA as pK. j T 6 Kam+ 6 ip ii.1. 4�� Kf`��s Yp UYLt T- nd7.b� 4Te br �LL Ly,s C b4;, ,�i• ud N� 4O.o� Y�L yp A, g` ti yu3 bCa y� L }} y bK T4 VoCVbq 4r Z a k�ay:U st Lb Y.ZZ, Z'i y « •C` 4� .o bKAnC91 � ab p�SF C Mt`baa + q r�dC I a N S=q K .+4q NR y lSQ Aw'4`dfR C'Q �� r4W bi U ZL. 448. V N ata 4 C 1 K� iIC �b3�Vir K4'Y :1. wT C+h E.Y.+4 ifµ"✓'VANe LLm K4UQ b Z. ^ L 9a ° N OVEN Q » N 96 SO G b b ga zt- .� FN cb q C YAN �q N L tii a« °�°..°. a bvC 1�,� u Y it Pew u GN 92L Yn _,224y wV 9 w4 I> r aGO °d Rtn 9a w d ^O 4y1y4. EQ �G ybV 9N Mr GO b�L � YES 1. �[�.. Y y 4 m �• x Y Q .. ywy YGt� O1yi dV i yw b Y 4 Q ?x. uyJ 69. ° _� tWJ c ° a= M Zb 4` O u U L y 4 a JOM YYG QL G su aa.+° wi N • H IA Y +l � �� a ✓a N ai J'� � aP � aAi P E N t � °I w L 4 O 4 Mt do �N s RR + y. L � ,l vt tM1 Td Z bt W bt Qot°.v Aq > ,lyC n.x fi D. 'xb„ C.CY LK u 'L Us 4 _ S•Y�w .p '< U @ '.4. N N vt o� ro.°•. 4 n N M N a r w N 0701 -02 3 -13 -85 PC Agenda 3-of 4 I z Lq�> � � a 4q V L• M m° N �_ L q � N `p s � C v u p O,.> �� i g s lL..r 6, �, _.�•- _.r... 6 0 C y z Lq�> � � a 4q V L• O V N6 p N �_ Ea o9 � N `p s � C v u p O,.> �� i g s lL..r 6, �, _.�•- _.r... 6 C O q u I NC 1=.2 O= q= L C u T mu NO y / jq • Q 9y .p 4 6 V E L. Iq- C= OF RMCHO CUCA_MONGA WDIORMAIDLM DATE: Marcn 7� 1985 ,� 19" \ T0: Chairman land Meiners of the Planning wommission. FROM% Rirk Gomez, City Planner I SUBJECT: VARIANCE:r34 -09 - ASSURED MINI- STOkAGE - A r�tie�c?iio allowr a r`eauctiop in the equired minimum landscape coverage in the order to construct�� mini- storage facility on north side of 4th Street and east of Turner Avenue in Subarea b, Industrial Park designation - APO 210- 371-03, € ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDItIJONAL USE HERMIT 844i� - RED MINI-STORAGE - construction of a mini- storage -development, wilt caretaker's quarters, total I Ing ,12,80 square feet on 1.44 acres of land in the Industrial Patric (Subarea 81,. District located ono the northside of 4th Street and east of .f Turner Avenue fAPR 210- 371 -0. The staff reports for the above- described projects willr be delivered, on Monday, March 11th. - ';i l a 2y; t7r S ty dt t r r s1 CI`ff OF RANCHO Cuf, +ICNGA ST 'E REPORT �9 �� nvs 3477 DATE: March 13, 1985 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Howard Fields, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: VARIANCE 84 =02 ASSURED MINI- STORAGE - A request to allow a reduction in the, required 15 minimum landscape coverage in order to cons€ oct a mini - storage facility n the north side of 4th Street and east of Turner Avenue in., Subarea 6,: Industrial Park designation - APR 21.0 - 371 -03. RELATED FILE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -I6 ANALYSIS: In Subarea 6, the Industrial Area Specific Plan required 15% minimum on -site landscaping covers 4or the total site. The proposed landscaping plan provides for appr� ggately 2,300 square, feet of total on -site landscaping. Based on tfiL,Aot square footage of the mini- storage site of 52,726 square feet, the required amount of coverage should be approximately 9,000 square feet. Through recent changes to the site plan, the applicant has made provisions to meet the required 45 foot front setback for special lands.�:aping treatment along the 4th Street frontage. I However, this only equates to approximately 2,300 (3.6 %) square feet of the total 9,400 square feet of on -site landscaping required by the 15P. Several factors should be considered, the project layout and design incorporates 6 foot,._M high block walls encompassing the entire site. The intent was to screen as much of the activity within project as possible and provide site security as well. Additionally, the applicant proposes to place ".. interior .tr wells every •30 feet along the westerly property 'litre. These tree wells and the placement of specimen size trees are _envisioned to- brealt -up the westerly building elevation. Again, this equates to ver; little landscaping coverage. If the applicant wer6 to place the required 000 square feet of landscaping coverage on the subject site, the landscaping would significantly reduce the- proposed b0i1dingt sizes. Due to lot size - constraints 100 feet x 601 feet, the following options should be considered: Planning Commission Staff Report Variance 84 -02 - Assured Mini- Storage Page #2 C' 2. Encourage the))pplicant to consolidate site with adjacent westerly pro fkrty to satisfy the landscapei, coverage overall,, or 3. Consider approval of the variance request. FACTS FOR FINOINf: State law, as well , .�a as the ISP `% gives the Planning Commission tine authority to approve` variance for certain development standards only f when special circumstances applicable to the prapErty such as ixes shape, or topography would create undue hard S ships. Also, variances ncay only be granted AQ the strict enforcement of the ISP would result in practical di;ficu{ty or(_, unnecessary hardships inconsistent with the objectives of the ISP. The'size and shape of this parcel does create a hardship; how�,fer, the site could be master planned with the adjacent westerly parcel Before gr_*itina a varfance the Planning Commission shall make the following findjfigs: S 1. That h <, p k 4 pro osed use is in accordanc�i 'with the General I Plan, the Specific Plan, and the purpoi s of the Land Use category in _)hich the projzct is lacatypY " 2. `the proposed use; together;�With conditions applicable there Ha, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety aA welfare, or injUrious to j properties or `r• improvements in the vicinity. 3. 7bat the proposed use will comply, with each of the applicable provisions to the Specific Plan. CORRESPONDENCE:' This item has been advertised as a public hearing in`' The Daily Re art newspaper and all proP�:rty ,owners' within 300 feet of the sTi ect site chave been notified. In addition, hearing public notices have been tosted`on the subject property. The Westerly'adliacent Property owner ha' expressed his written opposition to the project proposal and variance. RECOMMENDATION: it is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input and elements of this project. If after such consideration the , Commission can support the Facts for Finding, the adoption of the ` attached Resolutipn would be appropriate. r; 14 r vin'] e H _5 e .. r c;# ' t� fit j_( 7 i y� k' \' fj ; �.� S S : t.a+cJerJ.'� rUws. �x�k �+'• _. � �cce M�lJt �reie,�r -e • tt �i �` .. � x+,nwi x,sl'Y I.rwr. w+Mr ,se• rx++ie c�i i6pfij: -t ,;_��- :. .:: -. �. sw.,•aw }1 :, u.n hi1) s]4•Iwx. _ x RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 84 -02 TO REDUCE LANDSGAW'COVERAGE LOCATED NORTHSIDE OF 4TH STREET AND EAST OF TURNER AVENUE IN THE INDUSTRICAL PARK DISTRICT. WHEREAS, on the 24th day of October, 1984, an application was filed and accepted on the above- described project; and WHEREAS, on the 13th day of March, 1985, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing . p±,rsuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. C11 . SECTION 1.: The Rancho:, Cucamonga Planning Commissic"i has made the following findings. 1.: That a proposed use is in acco ,dance'j witk 7zbe , General Plan, the Specific Plan, and the purposes of the Land Use category in which the project is located. 2. That the proposed -use, tottether with "conditions applicable thereto, will not? be detrimental to the public•heaith, safety and welfare, or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity: 3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions to the Specific Plan, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13Th DAY OF MARCH, 1985. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY; if ' Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST:: - Rick Gomez„ Deputy Secretary r° fi x� V} I, R�;k Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commissik` of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do h2re5y certify tha'r. the foregoing ResA.tion was duly and7' regularly introduced, pa,lsed and adoptalr by' the �anninq,,tommission of the City of �Ancho Cucamonga, ; a regular meeting of ti�'�.Olap'1ng Q; Wss on helc�;�r on the 13th day of March, l 5, by the following vote �rf AYES. COMMISSIONERS: "COMMISSIONERS. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS;! I, _ l I 1 .. I I m" ,� � AN RESOLUTIOAi ,WO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMOWA PLANNING tOMISSlon DENYING VARIANCE NO. 84-02 TO REDUCE LANDSCAPE COVERAGE LOCATED NORTHSIDE OF 4TH STREET AND EAST OF TURFtf.R AVENUE dN THE INDUSTRICAL PX9K DISTRICT. WHEREAS, on the 2tth slay of October, 3984, an application was filed and accepted on the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 13th day of March, 1985, the Planning Commission held duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Comission has determined that the following findings cannot be,,oet 1. That j proposed use is� in accordance ' whit the Gene l Plan, the Specific Flan, and the purmses of the Land Use category in which the project is r located, 2. That the proposed use, together with conditior� applicable thereto, will not be detriaiental to -ma c public i--alth, safety and' " -velfare, or injurious to propert es or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use will Comply with each of the appl ca0g provisions to the Specific Man. 3� APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS `;13TH DAY OF MARCH, 1985. � PLANNING CON6114'"SION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST-. r Ri Gomez, Deputy Secretary / s A v I, Rick. Gomez, Deputy, Secretary of` the Planning Comm ssign of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby, ::e,'tify -that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,, passed;, and adopted by the Planning Commission of .the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning commission held on the 13th day of March, 1965, by the following vote -to -wit. 0 AYES: COMMISSIONERS« - FLOES, % COMMISSIONERS,. ABSENT.- COMMISSIONERS. L r j �, to CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA cA'C"M STAFF REPORT �� t t U BATE: Y; March 6u ^,1985 L977 TO: Chairman and M*ers of the Planning Commsssion FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner .' BY: Howard L. Fields, Assistant Planner SUBJECT ENVIRINMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERR:IT 84 -16 S REO MINII- RA uctzun of a m ni- storage develnpment, with.- caretaker's quarters, totalling 32,850 sq. ft. on 1.44 acres of land in the Industrial Park (Subarea 6) District located on the north side of 4th ki eet and east of Turner Avenue - AP11.210- 371 -03. - REL�;TED FILE: VARIANCE 84 =02 1. °PPOJECT AND SITE DFE'CRIPTION: A. Action Re uesi / *, Review and consideration' of a precise site Tian and ar, ;tectural design, and issuance of a Negative Declaration,,, B. Purpose: Construction of a mini- storage development and U caretaker's quarters. C. Loc ^.tion: north side of 4th Street and east of Turner Avenue. D. Parcel Size: 1,44 acres. .,, 5 E. Existing Zonin Industrial Park (Subarea 6) of the Industrial—— Area Specific gears. F. Existing Land Use: Vacant. G. Surrounding Land Use and Zon MOM Vacant, existing flood control channel, ISP "iouth - Vacant, Chevron Specific Plan, City of Ontario I .'ast - Existing industrial facility (Poly Plastic), ISP Vilest - Vacant, ISP H. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Industrial Park North - Industrial Park,, J South - City of Oniarid corporate limits PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT � CUP 84 -16 - Assured Mini - Storage March 13, 1985 Page V=, I� Site Characteristics: The subject site is an abandoned and unimproved flood control easement, 'Which 'is fair',;; level with gentle drainage to 4th Street. Prese'htly, site has light vegetation with no trees and has no significant cultural/historical aspects. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: Subject site is located in an Industrial Park category of the Industrial Area Specific Plan (ISP) and has frontage on 4th Street, winch identified as a majcr arterial and a Special Boulevard uy" the - ,4neral Plan' These designations are subject to special considerations for both the streetsrape and architecture. -,_ -- _ `The site is a remnant flood, control easement that is a legally :,ion conforming parcel. The project proposal is a permitted use under light wholesale, storage and distribution. A conditional use permit is necessary due to, the incorporation of a caretaker'slmanager's unit, 1) The parcel size is a major constraint (100 x $e1) and limits consideraVy the potential uses, that can occur on the site and poses several unique prohlems which' the Ces.igtt Review Committee dealt with. ^ Lot Size.. A rational, approach would be to consolidate the project rite with the larger westerly adjacent parcel, thereby offering expanded opportunities ta,. Master Plan the entire area. however, this approach is difficult due to different ownership. Since this is a legally non- conforming parcel of lark ,left ov* " "" from the realignment of the ' Floud.,;Gngtr:)l- Channel, and the proposed use is defined under the permitted uses of Subarea 6, the Planning Comsission should consider if the proposed use is the optimal use for the subject site given its present state. The 100' x 60111 oblong parcel prvides limited opportunities fo; developing other Permitted or co'WlitionaU uses; allowed in Subare 6 (see attached listing). Secondly, the f;o mission should consider the scale of project proptsai. Under the revised proposa , the building coverage ttr density is aproximately 70%, which is sxvre thap. twice the density allowed or imposed on other projects -in -�ubarea 6. Density ratios should be in the order of 30.35 %. Scal :.g the project down would allow, adequate' spatial arraggement and additional design. considerations (i.e., break up the buildings, =i prgsiew additional landscape �j;overage). ' PLAWING COMMISSiON' STAFF REPORT CUP 84-W- ; � Assured Mini - Storage - March 13, :1985 - - Page 3 c y. Access. • The °site' re`veais a regional' constraint that 1!�ecludes ` ` any consideration far east -west access, thereby cons , ting and limiting internal circulation opportunities with ,• the westerly adjacent parcel. -The 300 foot spacing of drivewayy}} on ' the 4th Street arterial'' would force the westerly ;l;fs pare,, driveway access dangerously, close to the Turner intersection4 !14 %major objective for 'reducing potential traffic hazards is to limit the proliferation, of driveway approaches on major arterials and encourage safe circuv"',ation through a reciprocal concept ';(driveways and easements - under the_- provisions of Planning Commission Resolution No. 78 -28. Desi n. The project proposal inclu,jes one of two 400 foot long dings, ui which will,, incorporate a .two -story concp v:. Its appearance would present an'expanss of blank buiJding� 41ls an both the west and east el pvations. The ' o s g p?',Po ed butla�p9 has little or no architect6r 1, relief o-. `c eatment which is somewhat inconsistent in �'erms of design with a Special.' _) Boulevard > designation 'or to dthat required _in the Industriar; Park category._ =The _ Commission= coulck 'consider" additional architectural modifications of the iineat; buildings. " B. Design Review Committee: The CoaOtee advised the applicant to submit revised asi gn el "ations mire in keeping with Office Design Standards and Guidelines of the Industrial "Specific Flan. Of particular concern were the blank building walls along ft,- st and east elevations hay, q an overall length nf, °re4isin approximately 400 feet and the elevatiov.: = rem Tect' "Industrial �,` the Park "' designati�n: "t ", l , The Committee recommended'the u#'l;i ti! of scored block _- vertical "scored block.to enhance'tLb elevations. Specifically, fluted or scored concrete detail �,e provided on the entire second story mini- storage. f9uilding 55�s oell `'as the caretaker's unit. Three bands of vertical scoredk�black were recoaqended to circle the entire length of the eTavation als; the use of .,and similar'materials in t a block °`wall design,' -= _ C. Technical review Committee: The Committ`e - reviewed and tH,t site lam subject "to revisions "concerning fire ,)approved -,):c c ccess width' Of 26 feet sufficient i,urn�- around radius, and ' placement of fire - fighting facilities. Also the Foothill`�ire District required the applicant to sprinkler the 'trash enclosures.- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF,,?;cPORT COP 84 -16 kssure,4-Mint -' Storage March 13, 19as P tge 4 D. Environmental lia, G\ sessment:. Part I of the Initiaf -study was completed by, t )"e applicant. Staff has Completed Part II of the env, ronmentai checklist and determined that, this project may have, significant impact upon the invironment by creating a visue,taesthdcically offensive site�� The applicant proposes landscaping along the project fronta > and encinsing the e,c� site with a 6 foot high block a" mitigation measure; :however due to;i9e two -story developmie;t concept, proposed building will will be ip considerable view`'.�l III, FACTS FOR FINDINGS- Before approving Conditional Use Permit 84 -16, the Plannir Corr4issi9 ,mus \make,the following findi:ags: I. That the�,osed rise is in accordance with cage Generax Plan; the'•Specific Plan, and the purposes of` t 4 ,sand Use ` category in which the site is located. 2. That the V-T'0045o 0 use, together witr the conditions applicable chex,eto, will not be detrimental to'the public health, safety, or welfare_-, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in 6e, vi -6lfil"t , 3. That the proposed use will comply- with eao of the ":\ applicable prc4 lions of to the Spe(:ific Plan. 4. Tne proposed parcel shape and size is appropriate for the ,proposed use. J,1a �' GNDENCE th s'ite'tr "bias been advertised din The Daily Rc�ort ." `( 1 lic. nearing. In addition, the property was -pos �d an ; 11 not'r� were sent to all property L ` "' r y Nnevsi wiT .�: 300 feet )f ,the project site advertising the public nearing. To date, one letter has been - 'received in opposition to the pro ject',- 1 lJ G A. t - _��wu.s.._n.s�r �a.aaie+l3.cb7. .,....u..ttc,.,. . 71_ •C.,. i'' i5 .ry . _ . _ ,aa _.n. i PLANNING COMMISSION SiAJF REPORT C;JP 84 -16 - -Assur d Mini- Storage March 13, 1985, Page s V. OPTIONS: The- Planning Commissio�i may select from the following options: 1. Approval of Conditional ,lose Permit 84-,16 based ch the Pacts for Findings, Conditions of Approval, adopt ~on of the ,atta, ,.hed Resolution of - Appro4di, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. 2. Continuance to address Planning Comrisslon concern over points of discussi6i and for further modifieat4-;n or clarification as needed. 3. Usniai of Conditional Use Permit 84 -16 based an the Findings listed on the attached Resolutir i of Denial. Re ly submitted, q r - is Gone.. : ... ,. it ner RG:iiF•ns Attachments: Letter from Applicant Exhibit "A" - l iratinn Map Exhibit "'6".- Sifte Utilization Map Exhibit "C" - "t•3ot Plan , Exhibit - "D" - Desigri Elevations Exhibit "E" - Landscaping: = - -- . Exhibit '`F" - Grading PiGn Initial Study, Part 11 Resolution of Approval with Conditions Resolution of Denial i f- SUBAREA 6 General Plan Designation industrial Part{ Primary Function Subarea 6 "is located on both east and west ,sides of ' Haven 'Avenue extenzling south from Arro.J to 4th i Street. While some existing manufacturing uses t exist around the AfESF tfack, the area is substan- tially undeveloped, in ',. the future, Maven Avenue will serve as a major access and gateway,to the City., Development is this subarea will provide for thglhigh quaiity character as with "Office PafS01 type development. Permitted Uses ' Custom Manufacturing F F r.- Light Manufacturing Light Whotesale Storage and Distcibt €. , !l g u e Adml}!�Istra�tive and Office , I r Building Myfntenance Services."; Business Supply Retail Sales and"Services Business Support Services' Commudi cation ServT Ps,, Eating and Drrnkingctstabii�hments financial, -ihsurance and 'Real Estate Services ` Hotel /Motel Medical /Health CareServicd3 Professional Services Administrative Civic Services Conditional Uses Automotive Rental Automotive /light Truick Repa�im -Minor .:. :Automotive Sales �`�kaomot i ve Service Station i�`Aing Supplies and Sales- BY Convenience Sales, and Services Entertainment Fast Fond _ Food and Beverage Sales Funeral and Crematory Serviices Personal Services Recreat4onal Facilities Cultural -- Puh1ic Asserqbly `r%uhTTc`Safety -and Utility Services Rel;gious Assembly ss LL ry $ . tl_V`29 T r ALAN R. TIBBETT8 7957 Barden.a. Avenue _ Rancha Cucamonga, CA 91701 i71�3R$4 ^7I5'4 :r� March 6, 1985 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning :Division 9320 Baseline Road c% f -:Rancho Cucamonga �;aliforn a 9173o ` Attn: Mr. Rico: Gomez, City Planner 1) Ref: CUP 84 -16 & Variance 84 -02 & /or< -04 (Mini- storage Development) Dear Mr. Comex- I I am the principal owner Wand,spokesman for the remainnq owners2 iaf the ,land parcel ;immediately to the west side of the proposed i mini -- storage project. This letter is written to can-Firm that we plan to appose the- proposed development,at the planning com'- mission public hearing scheduled for n s:f Wednesday night. We shall provide added comment at the !.earing, but the following summarizes our position -, y' 1. ISP- Goals. The proposed use is clearly incompatible with the stated goals of,,the Industrial Specific .Plan USP3, including but not iiiiirtedto: a. Promotion �bf employment opportunities. ,~ b. Establishment of a „specific, well - defined pattern industrial activities ... ". c. Promotion of ".... an'attracti.ve and high quality design in developments, which upgrades the City's natural. -environment and identity...,. Comprehensive soljtttions to developm ,-nt are to_ be Ou=ght, rather than ad hoc case -b s ` a Y -cas� solutions. 2. ISP Regu.ilrements. The proposed development - Fail: to meet.,pany of the specific regirements of the •TSP� afiibng which are the following: f Y} a. The, 1r-14-acre prckj f—et fails t--p meet the -2 -ache { minim f dot sxZ { 1_..;; : -Afied for Fourth Street, s- City of Rancho Cucai6ongs - Planning Division March 6, 1985 Page Two - i! 2. ISP Reguzi-emenfits (Cora'd). b_ The (irrdPdsf?.d stri:cJture density of about 707. is afore than" m twice, (that density which will be- imposed upon the l adjacd It prtaper-ties under the terms of the ISP. c. Total landscaped area fails by a factor of three to Lhe mee�I ISP minimum of 15% of total project area. ;' Agpearalnce. /i}se proposed project, which includes a 400 -foAt -long. 2- story storage structure with lit�:rally , no "djacent laadscapings is aesthetically inconsistent with the ,Special Boulevard designation currently assigned to_Fourth Street. The site is so small that there will' be� no way to hide the fact that it is dominated by ar.' iS- tc -19' foot -tall by 400 -foot -long box, with no - .architectural relief and little L d ZStinguishing architectural treatment. it is obviously not the image that should placed in the gateway'areas of Rancho Cucamonga. 4. USE. The YSP was established to encourage industrial growth of -,high quality'`in the City.: R. mini- storage facility, especially one two stories tall (amsuming than this is even practicalis is not a use which should be encouraged in this area. It will promote traffic which is inconsistent with the use and potential uses on both sides and on other surroundiag properties, and wmald set a tone which is counterproductive to the goals which the City is,reking to encourage,' S. Fairness and Consistency of fifty Pol- Yi generals the proposed structure density, setback and lsndscaping jL allocations are clearly inconsistent with tfv);/ require- ments being imposed on the mber propesles under development in Zone 6. ShrJuld thp�City c6o"ose, to allow this project to proceed as p�opilsed, then we as adjacent 'property owners would rightfully expect equal treatment when our project is presented to the Planning- Division for review Iater this year. Out' current devf,-lopmert plans envision from 34,000 43,000 sgyare . feet of high- quality industrial -per}, type of use on the .�5 Qurr -acre parcel immediately west of the mini - storage project. projn�_`'Will thus have a structure /land density of only 23 to 29%. we are Yr currently in negotiation with a major anchor tenant for this development. we strdpgly believe that, should the proposed mini - storage project be allowed, it will discourage any high quality user from locating on our. site. i�I City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division March &? 19SS - � Page Three , Plannin(• , Division is rL*quest" to please keep ,ate io-Formed in a timely tRilner of any signiFicint'events related to development of the subject property, either by mRaii or by Phone. I hope this' matter reaches an end restileation which is compa *ible with the goals of both the city and the affected landowners. Clearly, we would support almost any developmen`,Ewhich meets the gtaals and requirements of the Industrial Specific Plan. I would like,to thank Mr. Fields for his time and patience in n. erplainimng the ro osed p P project to rs�-- today; Y found isiso approach to be both pleasant and thoroughly professional. �t 4t' Si rely - ` Man R. Tibbetts Adjacent Landowner cc: City Planniiw Commissiot -- Commissioner David Harker Commissioner Suzanne Chitiem s' Commissioner Larry MaNiel c Commissioner Herman Rempel Commissioner Dennis Stout • ,y t, � I i 4 PH LM AL-Al -� lis.p NORTH„ CITY OF ITEM. Or PI- ANNING Di15ittii •� •• CHIBIT _: SCALE SY: �. l5�. `I r, I .��, ,'r :� I • �, '� l s f( Z } F e i ( �te P7.a.t Moir i � �$I"B" ` n u 1i 0 f E I. v,. T 0 i� x f I u� z F yy L .•� itt m all T ` X04 Y r •mac -f,..x m 'x •, R Ott i y Yl LA In Lit }} CITY OF RANCHO. CUCAMONGa i PART II - INITIAL STUDY E1'VIRO:tiMNTAL CHECKLIST . DATE: A�7111 APPLICa.Yr Go2d� ftr�s/TEc�y U.L/ r/ r,d FILI:iC DATE* _Q4 IMMER: 44&.0 PROJECT: C Ixl W C',�g2 ,67,PA!+,L S G�dN— -S— ��cc'cx� ©%✓ _p -f' A � /ir�i �' 'd PROJECT LOCATIO.I: �' I. ENCTIROS`MNTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" w9wers are required nn attached - sheets) . YES MATBE 1. Soils and ueolo¢v. NO„ Will the proposal have signi£icanc results in: a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? v b. Disruptigns,- displacement_-, compaction or burial of the soil? y..� c. ..Change in topography or ground surface contour intervals? d. The destruction, covering or madificstion` of any unique geologic or phyroical` features? a. Any Potential increase in virjd or water erosion of soils, affecting either on or off site conditons2 f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? / g. Exposure of peolele or propai y to "Zea'pgic hazards such as earthquakes, landslidL , mud- slides,'ground faxlure, or similar hazards? ►r o h. An increase in the rate of extractan and(nr %i J _. _Usg gf any mineral resource? �: y }� 2 AY3tolnrty. Pill the pronosal have si J bAl, lit exults in. o g surface waters, cr any. ` alteration of surface water quality? f� Alteration of ;. — r% ' groundwater characteristics? 8. Change in the quantity ac grou erndwats, either through direct additio or er drawals, or thicugh i�terfpj�vce with aquifer? _ Quality',\ Quantity? h• The reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for putlic water supplies ?' 3. Exposure of people or property to water_ _. re_atedciazards such as flaajing ar seiches? 3• Will the proposal have signiff:ccant / results ins a. ',t:onstant or periodic air emissions`frdn' mobile flr indirect sources? „ �.,✓ Stationary sources? b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or I interference with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? C. Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture, ar temperature? G. Biota Flora. Will the proposal have significant results G ia_ a: Change in the charatterintles of species, i including diversity, dis�,,Ilribution, or number a of any species of plantsI b. Reds.rtiou of the number of any uni u or4tidangered specie s af]plainptq /s? R e* tare= tit / A Y r ro N� YES . MAYBE ., o a- .Changes in cu.rr{nts, ox the `course of fixection .'� „of flowing streams, rivers, o or s b- Changes in absorption rates Y drays; age patt�rns, Or the r runcff, r Alteratians to the coi;rse,!br .flaw of flood waters? d. Change iri the amount of surface' water i � ixt � e. Discharge jut a, V _1 ' Pane 3 C. introduction of or- YES. 3UYBS 4\o new disruptive spec: es r-I Plants into an area? d. Reduction in the potential for agricul,.ural, production? Fauna_ Will the proposal'have si.gnifieaIIt results a., Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity,. distribution, or numbers of any species of animals? • b. Redact' °on of the numbers of 'any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. introduction of new or disrUPtive species of animals into an area or resultn.a bact'ier to the migration or movement of aykmalli? t/ j d. Deterioration or removal C 'sting fish or wildlife habitat? 5. Pavulation. 'Till the proposal have significant results in: a. Will the proposal. -Iter the location, distri- bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 4/ b Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing ?�7 rr 6. Socio- Economic EBCCOYS. Wil the Prop-.)sal have significant - results in;, a. Change in local or re economic characteristics, mina cocio- including L'COIIO.'aiC ❑X czmercial diversity, tax rate, and property � values? n. Will project costs be ,equitably distriauted among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, _ tax payers cr project users? r �! 7. Land Use and Plannine Cansia.,Ya[ons. Will the proposal have significant results in? a. A substantial alteration f the present or planned land use of an area? ,F• - b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, Policies, or adopted tilans of anff governmental ' C. An impact upon the qtd ity or quantity of r :i. existing consumptive or Stan- consumptive' recreational opportunities? Y' rage 4 ., MOL 8. Transo�rtat3 prt. rasa tts ine Will the p re P esa 1 have significant C a. Generation movement? of substantial additional vehicular U fb. 1 Effects On existing streets, or de, for new street canstruction ? - c. Effects on existing parking facilities, demand or for new parking? d. Substantial impact upon existing transgbrta- tion systems? t f u e. Alterations to prei`ent of circula- tion or movemenr.gf eopatterns p PIe andfor goods? f. Alterations to effects on present and potential wrater- borne, air traffic? rail, mass transit or , &. Increases in traffic:,':6zards to motor vehieles, bicyclists j ar pedestrians? ° 9 proposal . signi� Cultural Resources Will the ra osal have sSgnxficant results -_ in. a. A- disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, Paleontologfcal., and /or historical resoutces? 20. Healrh. gaiety and Nuisance Factcrs. Will the prpgpsal nave sIgnificant resulta in. a. Zreation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? / '... b, Fxposure of people to potential health hazards? a. A: risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances in the ^ -y� event of an accident? tIX d. An increase in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathanogenie organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? e-, Incr -ease in existing noise levels? - -. `c f. Exposure of people to noise levels? potentially dangerous c S• The creation Of 0- —,-Di onable odors? #� ? h. An increase in light or glare? F. 0 y Page' . 5 " Y_5 �YaE NQ 1I. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant results in. a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic vista or view? b. The creation of an aesthetical situ ^^ ly offensive �r c• A conflict with the objective of designated Or ootential'beenic corridors? 12- Ut :Uities and Public Services: Will the have a significant t4dd f- f — proposal alterations to the foilovingnea systeIDs, or a. Electxic power? v b. Natural or packaged gas? c. Communications syste&so t/ d. Water supply? e • 7a tec;ater facilities? f. Flood cori?rol structures? F. Solid waste facilities? h. Fire protection? -� i. Police protection? ' j- Schools? k. Parks or other recreational facilities2: %" 1. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads and flood control facili ties. M, Other govarnmental services? 13. Enerey and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal have � significant ro_sults In: a. Use .Of substantial or e_Kcessive'f uel'ar energy? b. Substantial increagg in demand -T 77 7- t` n� upon existing sources rf energy? :J C. An increase in the demand for development of new sources of energy? d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumption �* of non - renewable forms of energy, when feasible renewable sources of ene_sgy are availab \e?' Page 'b v YES x!AYBE :IO e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or - scarce natural resource? j14. liandatory rindin•s of Significance. a. Does the project have the potent ,,'" degrade- > the quality of the environment ' substo degrade redu .i;, the habitat; of fish or wildlife species, cau!Z i fish or wild',fe. population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a la or nt p animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of Califoriia history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve " short -term, to the disadvantage of long -tear, environmental goals? (A short -term impact on the environment is one which occurs in 'a relatively brtef, definitive period of time while long - term impacts will endure well into the future)., C. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable means tb:j the incremental effects of an 1 individual project are considerable when viewed in Connection with the effects of past projects, rind probable future projects). d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, .either directly or indirectly? V ZI. DISCUSS low Or E, Igp _TAL EVALUATION (i.e., of affirmative answera*.ro -- the above questions plus a discussion of proposed mitigatian measures), - z ""e f1 Page 7 S _i11. D£T L.ItI`F,AT1p-1 On the b4 Is Of this initial -evaluation: 'effect I find tke Proposed prajecc COULD NOT have a significant on the environment, and a :NEGATIVE DECLARATIQ;1 will: be prepairP(f. find that although rice proposed proje//cCould have a significant ffect an the environments there will J(ot be a significant effect in this case because toe mitigation r, asures described on an at6ched sheLt .have been added to 0"' Project, A P!EfrnTln DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. lE_ti� . i find the zo osed °�% P p pro ect MAY have a significant effect on the anvirnment, and an EN VI MEP1T ZiPACT ,REPORT ..s rewired, Date nati's„e ' Titi Cam. �t � tit J u 4;- t b T' '. ^<t l ice" RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE `RANCHO t9CVONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERM1T NO. 84 -16 FOR ASSURED MINI - STORAGE LOCATED ON THE NdJiTH SIDE OF 4TH STREET ANA , EAST OF TI)RNER AVENUE IN THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN - DISTRICT WHEREA S on the 24th day of. October-, 1984, complete application was ` filed by Gordon Huntley for review of the abova- described project;. and WHEREAS, on the 13th day, of- March, 1985, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public heariiigl \io consider the a4o e- described project. NOW, THEREFORE, thQ f Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolvld as ,. follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met, , That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, Specific Plans and; the purposes of the land use category in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the " public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3., That the proposed use complies with each of the applinabl._ provisions of the Specific Flan. v 4. That the proposed parcel shape and size is appropriate for the proposed use. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse- -impacts on the environment and that a Negative' Declaration is issued on March 13, 1985. SECTION 3 That Conditional Use permit No. 84-16 is approved subject to the following conditiops: \ 1. Approval of Variance No. 84 -04, 2. Provide tree wells every 30 feet along westerly property $ lilte. 3. The building `walls shall be �of fluted or scored block .• The east building Mall shall contain treatment for building length as it extends north from 4th Street. r5 � Resolution No. CUP 84 -16 - ASSURED`MINI- STORAGE Page Z /r ANIL 4• The west property liAe Wail shalt be compatible with the buildings through both material and design. LCi 5- The slidin-0 security gate shall be view obstructing with �) material mpatible with the building. 'mss 6. A fluted//!or scored concrete detail shall be provided on the seL;r,-,td story mini- storage building. ` 7. Provide two additional parking staTls< APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13th DAY OF MARCH, 1985. PLANNING CpMITSSiON'OF`TNC CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA i BY: Dennis L. SF01r. ha-i man: ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary, t: I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary`bf the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly,and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucpmonga, at a 'regular meeting of the Planning Commission held ,in the 13th day of March, 1985, by the following -Wit. vote -to AYES: COWISS1ONERSt NOES: COMMISSIONCRS ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: r L J 1 RESOLUTIq� NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE�,RANCHO CUCAPONGA PLANNING COKMISSION ,,,�% ' y DENYING CONDITIONAL U$E ,:PERMIT NO.. 84 -16 f-OR ASSURED �� MINI- STORAGE LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 4TH STREET AND EAST OF TURNER AVENUE IN THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN v OISTRICTr .i WHEREAS, on the 74th day of October,, 1985, a complete application was ' l e• filed by * for review of the above- described project; and W, WHEREAS, on the 13th C of March, 1985, the kancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a pub hear3n,q., o ccasider the above- described t project; and �, C.. WHEREAS, the proposed praaect site size and canfi9p,ration is .,?inadequate to comply with the goals and standards of the IndustriAl,Specific Plan relative to access and on- site landscaping,, and 4proposed WHEREAS, the elevations 'rdo meet the goals and design guidelines of the Industrial Specific Plan'- - ,dtive to the Industrial Park category which is intended as an attractive working environment with prestige value. NOW, THEREFORF, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows. ` SECTION 1: That the following f=ndings cannot be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the Specific Flan, and the purposes of the ;. land use category in which the site is-,located. 2. That the proposed use, together with the tionditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the - l public health, Aafety, or welfare, or materially injurious to �..�erties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use Ctmplies with each of the applic}6,je provisions of the Specific Plan. 4. That the proposed _paNel shape and size is appropriate for the proposed use. - . lee t� Resolution No. `tUP 84 -16 - Assured Mini- Storag ?, _Page 2 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13th DAY OF MARCH, 1385. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONSA 8Y: }rF i Dennis L. Stout, Chairman' ATTEST: �( Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary �. I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary `of the Planning Commission 'of the City of Ranrho,Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and` adopted by the,J►Ianning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of thi Planning Commission held on the 13th day of March, 1985, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES:. COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS F . ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: LrJ - i �j �a r Q... N Or yYO ^VL aQ, Oy R^ LpSp a�i 04 .0 NUwiy yY��N -. Y.W �• � G4 t Ym� Y �b _. V OYgy02�Or.e!^ bC O.NL 4.ON CVYQN qb4 O6QVy LQO� u °..i L rN «y EA 04u m.,..F Ouri.:CO. ^aT 4V VwYY. 4m4yp 2:13 y D V sV.... .. O V G eb+. m. G� V ^ ,, « n ,.Metag3 aEu.eCLr � "� u .0 4Gme A:- bLzu Y ytl 4ya gsce °aa.T�E Y'a 4s Yutl °Giro Q 4 YGNN �a ast «.Y b,R o 1� 0�3,m.0 YweG,i_YN OF Cam« Cj? r, VO Nr� time` �BCY.✓.- 7 wGadiN >.. r~04 4 NA ua �OYg CF O4tl /\ byM24 4 O`C�yyVq O�eN Yw IIF } w�j}{ ON GLF NSQ �.NbN f..: • O'VL« O p7. LCA �! GN yg O ^y� G Mw MIS H4 Oa�5 r1 O' >r`{T EC L CL pp� Y ao FT�G orA G pC1V=O �yNy Gr YpY. I C �wN «CK^Y \_�.. 0 NV 4QZq hG nG0 QG..+~. T« . 1 _�O •� '�N �I'c kv'lr.^' z GN Md�lb h. /\tI G�SY` Or N' \ V GF iJ.fiC L gL F.O C(O"' OrtlP. -p3L yiiy�o -Z. _t Q P+rO «+°,r Gnu F`-'ntYm Yob Qa cnrt'^' cLaa�Fi i Yb >.0 per, Ng ca �'N -t ai O OF9b q r OG`-. Gr��D MCG�4 NAG GOO Cp CQIV4 CrC d -,at S YAM G v.Y Cr H SV6 �. Pd. csc u .iY•ec.+Nwa ti° .i°Ya aG Grp a.r L =L GC IFb +O fit G�.V.b. tl a ^u�o.bsNY�as= "n: F0$,o1G. aeu« c k. .z ui ou 6+bi.2 a •- , 2 ry O tlW.GSYLL ._ r s VIIIrd: x�a y" aNff4 Li p � CyW p,� C?• y H e�p Om a N ICY N Ir u°«aQ cL ;.t� •• }. Q � N <. gGFr y 4 3O �c« a 0. M b At RYae$r�«aY. «n r'3. .Q+'�i.•�a eo.Nii e ly mu nGY a y °w Ln C d.L C v q a y L Cyq N'qQ u OYar..° ° qq4 YCM 'C r i Sara d v u, O one c �iL� ° °pan R� olm <YNLi U a R 1 C1 'n u "s"up' i � .°. '°w°.�anu r u-- v Nb nRUv pnM�O2 <Y76 �Y...° 4ili C C q • r� aQm i„ aati E Ym'.N E •a Gq RO r 6. �. C Y< ^ L R a � G � C^ _a N ^ .+Nau•F R� DNC � tiM:s +y <'aaa KZ n y °c c °RE Wz+Ta° iqR a N iL F. aem�� GC.N °.N. 4U9nS `q6 ;;n v t' o ptl.Ln� �°vuET m G3 -' L qu 1' SYY t v L713N Yt dgMags N a y,aya �aII l mu nGY a y °w Ln C d.L C ° qq4 YCM 'C uY°ye .�E� L •lC mGiN pr��L� •hrpi.°CC t R 1 � pnM�O2 • r� aQm i„ aati L4'.D. Gq RO r 6. �. C `aRTtrY:N ♦3L. "�k^ � tiM:s +y <'aaa KZ n 4L^ °c c °RE Wz+Ta° iqR a N iL F. aem�� GC.N °.N. 4U9nS `q6 ;;n nNyd u EYS .. �, RQTM dgMags Q N b '^ Y spa Yn0 ^ 1- .bPOdq ,rC C a' vcGYE °qnn .' <a.ma.s OO °` DOE pnmL �Y '' L 4.. Y p°'u''R^a. LyyG LI.6LnaDL �3 '�° ~R N�lS j° �a b �VG ^ °N }G 4 wO<y mGiN pr��L� •hrpi.°CC t R 1 � pnM�O2 • r� aQm i„ aati RL N C yytO Gq RO r 6. �. C �N�+ .raGLN SaL ^y 1�'^...vL Op ^•^ R= °N == � tiM:s +y <'aaa KZ n 4 L� n iqR �L o Y�.. N iL F. aem�� GC.N °.N. 4U9nS `q6 cy Q N b '^ Y spa Yn0 ^ 1- .bPOdq ,rC C a' vcGYE °qnn ^° 64R'N �. C~ qq pA y'S �3 '�° ~R N�lS j° �a Ny Cay L pT WN.N °4�La aaQgn and S. �aA QL, dE pOY Z�L Z ~ 4a O'C 94�� 4m Wa n9q N`Ma �y �.G � 6� V u�N" Ci'Waaia YY4aLO d aN„ ^. N' A mNR r >Upr i0µ, u °°a 69 <r's yQ0 ry G 44 �r 4' � U AAY � ^ � � R.Ya C. �£ ^4' < a pn> gar• qS�•^ v 5 4 y cm u 4orR av cv 'au ao. >.t- �>G�a� +'p NDN u a c ps+p"• � cr° EG P o qa °c q ch, e,. �' wa R s ^VYE a�ic <u�ua "` "'`Wa V. La u aorovoa ucap L no nq�j. °r ' aCRS GE++n6 t[ w W Z C.T L CL 1 1. t; VL •LL Ci � '. Ot r L O Y y y tr Y p� v v+� L >� .� 4 G C �� Y Q V 'O cane ! it a! a 1:! ;a •,.v n L � :i �at CL.O ? G ^V,Gy CVYff a.:. 4� U °9Y 6�L :51 4t + N N L � �..p « � O G. y • 9 Ofy R C C ZC iS � _ ', ,t,,, c. .9 Np- ,v"L 4 ^YOGL w .p R -O aliOI a LC OR tl,°a + wyw yCf y Z G° -z yN.L trL0 ^�R C>tr ap` Y +L k G Y rG g \_ RY L .2 � G a 9C10° pp G G' '�Ya � >w °� u C ✓4 0ya tl�11 i ag `a YN K Ol ^j1�1�V6Y �.Q 4c M'Oy LCC. CGp > �. Cu� a t ,40y. �M.p��y MGV Y� T4 q�a°+.:✓ nuc 6 = m.naN q� n,Geyy OCHE O�Y"�� Ly LOMQ yL� °` 3 r N n µyy3Y .5 + O a CC Z 6 Y M: 6Y tg Z9 - Yay a rz L t K {1� c 5v.0� [. N tl u g M 'O > V g °' Y V Y �. pi o c n O w« Yyq q6q ✓CC 6 L� p1 w µCoo 1wN« VO 4Y� O - °.mow ti l 79 V -�nVO ow.0 qn.M CT tra` a ,. Tq c. Ja e qn ✓ n � m. c zn •tom w d6nQQ' nga„°•T �q°`L. o.+`u «s° Gy TOt60y Xw i•�iV qC Otl °L tl��wtl Y N O. Y�L a ✓e« iU -✓ Kui ]iN Y�Y ty 00. Ku tLpa 6m i aY� n rY�G AT M H v; vc au. .-. was OVCD. •o° o «nj 06 �.✓ ty G. N3 L L pp nLL 4' >+ 4 ` nL 6L YN10 Bq -Y ^ L y 1��> +O 'Of6ytl t 6w L� ye 'Tp Uy A Cy „ V w y,.0 t Y. OT6+ Stn S1 YT at a Y C O4 p° fit+ yE d �i.✓,..Qi vgi .55 v o.n O M� po 'Sz-- apEb st'iu � t, yVFY � ^a+La nL r 1y`. S -1 y9 w.r3 v 1 oYa ��^ M L i iytr u ° Ll <N 6'HR SNR I�Vtt \ \L \!Y_M ■ M U °tom om o.R n OVO aR ^ �' v g ci ✓s v �g u w nn ypyt K C °^ 6l, n9 Cox= +C r�°L Yi J C S° /S� C C + G.G✓ _ p Gp�t� LQ b n'" 0� Y V V 1 N +� O �Y•YJ t 1L EY yOS .•y V 1 n .�.'>. BL�+o+ L 9� +0. L N. Z-41 � <4M #-nW Kc.l K-C L O L 1- �Own•cs n "+CNnM at �W YwI ao +o YO10 o° Cv � q Y Y yt. ays+ 7 kizf m6 '^ ro'"Nx �tl cCc C roQ O v O 7y Y� N L C L qw y. GY 4L Y wYCL VN Y OUt Y -u;E L ^ ° L t I S-_ a a C O4 p° fit+ tNYL +w d �i.✓,..Qi vgi .55 v o.n n„w• t, yVFY � ^a+La nL r 1y`. S -1 ✓ yyyQY4 C � Y M� • urn ° � 7 N F.• 1 oYa ��^ M L i iytr •L r`Nm �✓ o 6 .LU Y� vtY°..= Ll <N 6'HR SNR I�Vtt \ \L \!Y_M yt. ays+ 7 kizf �r+0 '•\.C_ etb OCYY - ..m0.t 9d LU c maer 4" d. �M om +C�C rn4 u lO7E ,4 C4E��'9.Y 4O O g. Y r.�.`d u. � M 4C `�. 9 u Q c C.r� p �y y .L t3 OrY• �^ O. z O m q 0FOL =�19 yC p r4 W ON -, . E RqN r Qi «nmW q «d06 �Y4y qL =L tl9 Ya „flM «....G 5 ` aa.. �. �o a$. «p _z�ou .� .�_.. a 3 L x� r,,., a E w $$ a �i tl« °orT _ CC •w� _ wr L ~� y� v. PA 4m. W VddMOpywG dC9 «9 ip wL mN �^ OVrrO SwF U ^ •'f V OU Y.� V m. E � yEE N S L NZ A-4-2 aaCC. 9..1rd -� V M.�-a- N- ?•..0. L m Y� 9 tl N L L E C ` '`r P� .C. p L N. O l u✓ .r 4 S ,4C 4 Y O\ O L .. Y 4 h C LN mn • i N. ` u« UZ ' � !•f..I W.L 4� lH O�:'`.�w4.0 N �. dd� WNy WVtY. �q v Otl « T 1C ��O M Yra W :j tl�Oi '1C vuC - .O� " C YY d G �� •4 Op � Yr� _ V V Z 4 « C ON•- Y d° ac' vi- _Q tl� Y. °qt �v4 •- ea ar yuus. n q i• d V O a .� qbb. L O Q qO C Q CQ ` ` ym nG i i mO:N D L E.L.M 4ti, M 00 Villa ^ 4 Cm.0 U. «' q 4�. aC DC dG Ga 000 S ~ �2 Lv v � O V ."• 52: dOym. AEI ¢ a sa C ♦ V _ y o y Ntl_ �+0.. tlwe CS>sW O,O «rL u f..l 4 •d Qt7 4L C L NL L� q YGO 4m� C-� �6 4r d MG pOL 0 P L b r• A. 2d ,� 4 V `cc o- -'.- €o� ym�sc eu ��• _ u °vQ Oavm�o RZTTY °c`a �r ,(w €r ��opp,Q-. .moo nns'' g. EC4S`� L,c> 440 CV W1i. Li �{2 6daEmiV Fn xzk:'ai Y'Lm .0 mC' 2 "Ek g'! m T- a V. ` b aS aVZ F ^b Q C O 4 °. V L� i y ZV ffi4�c YN ' e �p uA.. tlmr N b ts'Mn O i O a w 3 G C N 2 M N e �z, Y p u E <�C Sq L q y Hm W 4� aQ F R Y -i: R ; . b y is P qC Ty W _ Z t ^Y LL y jam.: + GC..°+ °Q wCi.L Od L VAN �~ n.tp °Qeti .V`L N N� N P 3 YV � Cci W3 t�atf NrY K1 � y LC 4v Y a0 =C�� Q $ CaON y ACU� 4 W°� L lf. tom. wp °AM '1°..9tO Oa bG yyyRlQ46 M � � 4C'�Vp d 1r 16 1, M U Ci4 m ate..9r t'ba4yy. 3 Nu -o 40 £g 4� ya iA f0 W6� 9ms� 4 4tl7etl ALL A!. Fi=x G+' Oy vz 9 y i yy.`��' Y.' tl tl C L ut S }OA ' o- Li .e amt Y' b.. E v 4�° ma at u 4pb :aw o �yy w'i UW�Y °p u ^ nl�.�.a c�� tit itlio, a.rr G;'I Y 0 SbIL up 6~. So bx �uu tl L . %4. wy A� O O LG....N Q b04 LYN J QLN 4r 6,Qa �G pQ.gp ESQ• A< 6 pCPO.R ay: P_ agi :a0. > O.a Sa`°Y � \�YY CpR t�� ruy`.VyQ Q piQ1 r ��y�. W ° �C N706 aC ¢N Q11 bROd. °MA ~E L �C yy ♦• gg ..04 V Cp d N LC�tl1.+ C a yF 4 N^ Y �� bdyQ4 VR 7 �� t ESY.H �VRKw 4b 64e1{? rrpNTytlP Cw�3E. �'� ,€d i3'R�ErL lr0�y C6G V4i^�G 2 > ya v r, i 3 a e` Yc E 0 r C T C �o V W 0 obi �' aoa.a� o_s �.. � � Orwr UW .�. .o+.°u .o.• � L ~ �W y w ea ♦'e �O � 'is s f Q yp Y V 4p O 7 4 L M ^ •? mLwy. Ey O C~ � � N � 4F . .� .fly w' - � m 9 °.`; d s Raa � L e - o L hig yW GL•CbuD u Q �G � Zit 0. Z�.. wY o� N •n.. mmp qy VW eC JI wre ... acs -rr Yv ..eG. a z '[44^ � Kati CYSpi CV s ++ mm F 4 HUS N a^ 4 qq K. c 1:5 .E y.4. 'Z o T vf=i a za 'K a H ai.Lwu. �cw +� a[ �. i L { s QO �r m cam:..° -_'° i'�aa°¢' II `cam «°�' � gd•, °�`o ao - Y�j y Z- YC e' W � Cm L� y 0 C4 �O 4 q AC V M -g-g �= as. sy. 7'j ,.. T-L ✓s 9 6_. G s ~ ptTY�.y y C rrjj s u N» b�q L .Y t ms - ^ ate LY 4v W�wl iiJ 38ii U.q .,b v. k°�1�t+ {aw yy¢� 4ro3t j' i � S 3 a e` Yc E 0 r C T C �o V W 0 0 o_s 1y i Orwr UW 3gs r wm o L ~ �W y w ea ♦'e �O � o� �m 4. SAF 3.. � ®iT` �W n a� N3 vi Ca tY �w u� 9 °.`; d s Raa � L e - o L a r ! cn D ° tw 0. Z�.. wY N Y m ff r0 1 0 a.. oW f! ' • . Ty-.4� i Orwr 3gs r wm o L ~ ♦'e �O � �m 4. SAF 3.. � ®iT` �W n 9 °.`; Raa � L e - o L a r ! cn D ° tw 0. Z�.. wY os m ... acs -rr ..eG. a z IE HUS a^ 4 •nc .p,m T G u m i o T vf=i a za 'K a H ai.Lwu. �cw +� a[ �. i C �►-s.c L .. +. �r o.••r usa { F,, {' t IS rB1tr Y r b v ai'°ao rca ar„ Ca r. �� N Ja ^C -q p® y r of w �.. w 4 _� or w� d ✓ r r w✓ ^� M NL dD Oy ~ tlC - ,AL dY yy'� NQ g CY NY -.2 _w d p' N y't' CCU N ✓ ► m 1E iW �V _ 4 3+v Y w u tl �; T RZ& 7 L n ♦ c b3 V7.9 rdj . }y '•� by >G y� Y Win' _ •C !�� r Y` p!� F yC _ d.. O OY a=p d �% L tea L + Y si-�' �� i OV J ^ 0✓ jT L� If z5 =� �3. O:J fS KIM tL6 �•,. aim 4 i I I I DATE: March 13, 1485 ,y TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Comrmission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner w BY: Dan Coleman; Senior Planner SUBJECT: STREAM.INING DES, (QPMENT /DESIGN REVIEW _ABS(RACT: This report Is one component of a planned program established to review the Development/Design Review process. The facul of this report is delegation of. certain approvals "La Staff which are presently reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. BACKGROUND: The Development /Design Review Process,n the City of Rancho Cucamcnga has undergone .a change during the past several years. Underlying this change is an increased political sensitivity to> certain kinds of development and a heightened awareness of "good design" by the Planning Commission and City Council, Within. the context of these dynamics, certain in liuences have occured -on the Developmed Review Process which have given rise to concern in the. development comminity regarding extended review periods and additional design critiques and requirements. Basically, the development community is concerned "with how long it takes for a typical project to proceed through the planning process from acceptance until Planning .Commission approval, ande-_- subsequently how long it takes from submittal of construction draw%gs for plan check to issuance of building permits. At the same time, Staff's goal is to obtain the highest quality development for the long term betterment of the community. There are several areas which need eta be improved in order to assure that applications can be ,processed withi`q the optimum level of time and quality of review. These are general Ty characterized as shortening the processing time, simplifying the processing procedure and clarifying -the processing procedures and design requirements to the public and decision makers. As you are aware, the length of 'time it takes to process indiv4,Yil. projects is based on'a number of factors including; a I. How_,long it takes the applicant to pply us whiz plans` 4 and information for review. ITEM 1 , Planning Commission Staff Report Streamlining Development /Design RLiriew - Page 2 2. Dow long it takes the applicant to submit revised. plans based upon Committee recommendations. 3. Projects becoming "stalled" by the applicant due�'ta, changing market and loss if financing. 4. ` Project not being revised per Design /Planning ,Commission input leading to an appeal to the City Council -v J'J Therefore, many projects take much longer than the normal seven weed -` approval from the date of full submittal of development plans. ANALYSIS: Staff is recommending a phased sireamlinineprogr✓''m by the PlanntnT1_,Comnission for the Development /Design Review rocess as �` follows.. I. Review and analysis of streaml`�rting techniques. 2. Implementation of streamlining, :techniques and a,'Jbption of - specific design and development criteria. 3. Compilation of clNnprehensive design guidelines,hOdouts. 1,�1 There are different procedures that can be implemented � S\\aff in or'r to shorten the processing and plan checking time.. The ur ose of this report is to focus u on the deleciation of certain res otsibiliti authority for Staff approya of proiQCts which are t.Y�rrentlY being required to go before the foil PTaoning Cszmnission for aD rovai. These appro 7 coy Inc ui de development reviews on our ma}+Jor boulevards, multiple fa i*y tracts, Conditional Use Permits and residential tracts- or parcel maps. In alf cases, properly defined administrative guidelines and design policies would be necessary to ensure implementation of PTar;.. -Ag Commission development /design review. The concept of a staff approval ' process is not new and has been used successfully for years in many is other communities and counties. Where public noticing is required, a ,. public hearing is held' where public input or comments are of, a controversial nature. Although this type of delegatior of approval authority has some political sensitivity, if this type of deleg4tinn could be given to Staff, it would expedite the process ,and`free up,'more time for the Commission and the Design Review Committeq", tc dealo with policy oriented issues rather than the mechanics de4l opment standards. Staff has compiled. a list of those development project approvals which conceivably could be delegate) by the Planning Commission to Staff: r, , c' ,3 Plaoning Commission Staff Report Streamlining: Development /Design Review Page 3 a 1. Those which' are approved by Staff with public notification, and 2. Those which are appro'd -by Staff- public notification. " Those project;S which mould require public notification, I,nclude the following: 1. Residential Development Review of 50 units or "less. 2.` Conditional Use Permits. 3. Development Review. 4. Variances. 5. Parcel Maps (residential', commercial and industrial). =% 6. Revisions to any project originally approved by Staff through this manner. '. f" Where public notification is required, notices would be mailed to all " property owners within 300 feet or on the expanded- notification When necessary.' Barring any requests for public hearing, the 'review could then be conducted at the Staff level. If a publichearing.is requested by the public, a - public hearing would be held in the usual fashion. Thin procedure further expedites the process. and improves connunity input by notifying surrounding residents at the beginning of the review process. The second group which do not reggire public notification, and are-., already approved by Staff, include: f L Minor Development Reviews. ` 2. Minor Exceptions. ;• " a 3, Interim Use Permits.-� j " 4. Architectural approval for residential single family t dwellings.: Conversely, the following: would still require review and approval by the full Commission: I� 1. Rezidential Development Review, on 50+ units, ,: f Al •� alt, � Planning Commission Staff Report Streamlining Devel,opmentiDes gn Review rage 4 2, ",' Master plans and-Area Plans. 3. Environmental Impact Reports and Negative Declarations. 4. Use Determinations. 5. Planned Communities. 6. Development District Amendments. 7. General Plan Ameadmonfs. 8. Amendments to development cede, apecific plans and planned communities. CONCLUSION, Staff is seeking direction from tt`►e Pl6ning Commission to proceed with the phased streamlining program as described in this Staff Report starting with development of detai`lecl design criteria and preparation- of necessary amendments to the appropriate codes to permit Staff approval. Re ectful�l "�N' t fitted, J is 'Gom " I City niter RG:DC:cv - f ' 1 =f ii 0,1TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ;UCanro -1- i STAFF REPORT �� p O DATE:: MarO 13, 1985 1977 YO: Chairman and Membere the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Gary Richardss, Code Enforcement Officer SUBJECT. SIGN ORDINANCE INTERPRETATION - VIDEO ZONE - A request to ;3 review the definition of 10Si9n" and its applicability to wit-7;ow lights, AB! RACT: A request/has been filed by James S Davis, Attorney at Law, representing the Video Zone, 8699 19th Street, requesting that the Planning Commission.,review, the Sign Ordinance and its ajlpiicability to window lighting, and to direct Staff as follows: (1) does window lighting require a sign application to be submitted, and (Z) whether or not the Sign Ordinance itself is overly broAd in its application to window lighting visible from the outside. BACKGROUND: The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code states that a permanent sign is de fined as any "device, fixture, surface, or structure of any kind or .character, made-of any material whatsoever, displaying letters, words, texts„ illustrations, symbols, forms, patterns, colors, textures, shadows, or lights, or any other illustrative or graphic display designated, constructed, Gr placed on the ground, on a building canopy,' `` wall, pn §i, or structure of any kind, in a window, or on any other object for the purpose of �..ivertisirg,, identifyi g,g, or cal7inq . visual_._.___ attention to an place structure, firm,, ent-- erar'e profession, business, service, product, commodity, person, or activity, whether located on the site, in any structure on the site, or in any other location "; PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF 'REPORTS Siga Ordinance Interpretation - Video Zone March 13, 1985 { Page 2 , In September, 1984, the Video Zone,js8689 19th Street, ([lhil and Brenda Goodman), were rotifie! that the display of string lights constituted a violation of the Ranch. Cucamonga Municipal Code, and were requested to have the nights remov i by October ,15, 1984. - jn researching the ` requirements of the Code, it was determined that #! use of the lights was defined by Staff as a sign, and therefore, regE+,,id the submittal of a sign application for approval. TherEforey Upon the perm;t request of the City, G19rt Application 84--61 was submitted on November 13, 1984jt for evaluation a`o,� approval. " John Meyer ; Assistant Planner, evaluated the appii_cation and dented it based' on ectiont 14.20.100(2) which states !' that only one sign is Permitted p�r . building face, and since the the structure aTready had an existing canister sign on front building, face, the application was denied. A denial letter was sent tj the Goodman's on January 15, 1985, informing them of the denial, and fui�h_er :. giving" them fourteen (14} days to remove the lights from the window area. An inspection was a ducted by the City Code Enforcq ent Officer January 30, 1985, �ure on #o compliance with the Code' The lights were still being displayed used, therefore, a citation -Awas issued to Mr. Goodman for violatian of the Municipal Code. The° citation is currently on hold pending the interpretation by the Planning Commission. On February 4, 1485, an appeal lei;,::er was received from James`S. Davis, Attorney for the Goodman's. Since the appeal letter was not received within the ten (10) day appeal period, it was refused. Then on February 1�, 1989, another letter was received from � Davis requesting an interpretation of the Sign Ordinance relating That c section of the ordinance which defines a sign and its appiicabil m to window 1, hts, t) j RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Division recommends that the pre t definition of a sign include window lights,'and that the denial o ''3 n -� Permit Application 84 -61 be reconfirmed. Resp•c f 1 s mitted- t, Ri k omen J ,. C y n r R :GR.ns : !YT. n wpS - t 4 \� ATTORNEY AT CAW 1 ° ArchibaldAvonuq s'u[e211 RanchoCucamonMCA91730 8714 H7.790G1 t Planning commission February ,1 19Bd City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Basel.i t Rd. Suitl -, , Rancho -Cucamonga, Cal , �! I, r Subject: Video Zone, sign Bpj;dca.'ion #84 -ti1 Gentlemen: I one of Whir; 5 etter is two fold, first to register my calipiaiint against for failing- to notify Ire of an adverse decision affecting my client, n Video ZOL- -- ;./in time to al?arzne to fi?e, aid appeal of a sign`appiicaticn decision. Secondly, to request a deieiminationjby the T'lanning caamissi'odE in regards to in their opinion the lighting fixture currently illuminating the window at Video ZMe's ? Rancho Cucammga stzre consitutes a sign and therefore requires a application pursuant to the city ondiz!atice. When first Mr. Richards first- contacted my client, ViO Zon-a and itln► ,Y owner, Phil Goodman, to advise him that in the city's cpo „fait the lighting in the window constitute a sign and therefore rewired q, app; Ucatirn mr Goodman contacted me anri ask m to handle the matter. T c�eted the sign application for Mr. Goodman and Personally hand carried it to Mr. Richards, gz!m him the APQlicatioi and my card and asked him to direct any further canmaicatioas to my office as I was handling the matter. Unbekiovmst to me an adverse decision was rendered and notification was sent to the client without a copy ;heing forwarded to my office. In that•I had told Mr. Goodman that the city iZuld be in tc6ch with: oral I would handle the matter, he did not forward the letter to rre. k��e�%�1ne 11, day gVaal period set � by city had elasped, Mr. Richards went out to t,se Video Zone store and cited then for the alleged violation of the city ordinance and Assued u ceased and deceit order concerning the lighting: 1,} Upon being cited, :Mr. Goodman contacted me to asc a --tain why lie has bzen cited when an appeal should have been filed, which eras my first notice that a ' deaial had been issued by the city. I contacted Mr. Richards, reminded him of the conversation that he and I had had cm(zerning th applicatzon and asked him why he did not send tale a copy. Se acknowledged the � Qersaj found my business card stapled to the inside of his folder showed ire on the letter that indeed ti was r_^.t a recipient thereof but stateid that as far as he was concerned he t�*as required to send it to the applicant and not; to myself. P k s �O '1 n; Page two February 12, 1985 i I explained the sValation to him at A ch time he spdo- to soireone else who i again denied to accept the_apreal. Mr. Richards, two daj's later, came office to return the` y ";and -``fi�ee letter from the city planner statin�-')iat `in_fork+htion ixzsed on city cardinanoe a tws had received from the cl, I-,, osecutor , they were not going to accept the appeal. I contacted the city prosecutor, told him'''SA at ed, the ,� happen d., ty ° prm-- pcutor advised me that he had not been given the full story an that in his cpih:. a the appeal she, have been acceptca�. I was later advise y the city prosecutor that he had`made that remomxendatipn to Mr. Richards Q Mr. Richards had refused to: follow it. 4` 3 MY position on this is twat I had taken the time to talk; to Mr. Richards in person and fully advised ham of m} duties in regards to tn;sIpatter`, Thin placed a burden on lair. Zich? : ds to, if nothing, elsd —at least advM. me of the denial . so that I could enter `a t appeal, The date of the ;1 ruaniag should have been the date tik�t I recev':� -d notice and not the date Mr. Richards seat the leti.er to the Video Zone, I might ?yid that under California Statutory TAw any no►.ice sent by mail is i automatically given a five (5) day extension for service by zeii. The letter Mr. Richards sent was dated t]�e 15th of January, adding five days' tit would have been the 20th, the 10th day for the appeal would have ,Jeen the and yet:. Mr. Richards issued the citation tha,30th `e on which was still within ten day appeal period. {L I would request tlu' my appeal to the denial of the sign app] atio4� be Considered timaly and procesV accordingly. _ In regards to the second matter, I have done extensive research cerni.ng the city sign ordinance, the inter- pretaiam of "she term sign by the i5ornia courts, and the authority of the City to issue such ordinance as set f in +'he California Government Cod`. ,loo where have T been able to find.any thority the part of the City to govern interior lighting of a building under 5N si. __ ordinance, The word sign as defined by West California Words and Phras-z includes all m --ar of items such as placards, bil_boards and other form's of inf6rmmtional printed medium. However, nowherejs the interior lighting considered to be a sign. :There is authority on the part of the City, to issue cease and desist orders for any lighting th t either resembles an official traffic control device or is so distracting to motJrists'pa a highway so as to create a traffic hazard however, that is not the situatiors'in this case. i- ` xs. Page three. _ F&miry 12, 1985 )' Mr. Richards interpretation is that if the lighting can be seen from then J y outside it constitutes a sign and therefore fails under the sign ordinance, - Thij is obviously an untenable position on the pay:t of Mr. Richards in that it world require a sign application to be submitted for any commercial building in the City of Itancho Cucamonga is which the lights inside the building can be seen from the cut/�ide. Mr. Richards went on to advise Vide Zone! t because the lights were U a line and were used to _attract attention Yiconstituted a sign. Once again this is an untenable posit on,in that any time lights are on in the building it is an indicati.ora that the business is open and therefore is attracting the attertioa of potential custcners. A perfect example of this j sit=uation is the Bob's Big Boy Restaurant across the street from the Videa�� 1 Zone's location. It has Ughting both inside and outsiderthat can Pa seen trod j the,,;oadway and is on during tii time that the business is.,in operation consequently that would fall under Mr. Richards kiterpretation of tLe sign ordinance. I It is obvious that the sign ordinance as it relates to ligh tg is void for vagueness, is an unconstitutional restzi c t ,on an freedom of a ai expression and is unenforceable in that reasonable me;)'vght differ as to its meaning and irt�t. It should be pointed out that tlx: lights are inside the 1 window of the Video Zone, they ono not flash nor do they impart any other message, slogan, symbol, or any oth--wr i.nforMation to the Public other than the fact that the store is open, and available for business. Lastly it is well established tin California tl� a ordinance controlling aamern al expression cannot be based strictly ca asthetic princi=pals but must have sand underlying justification s=h as public safety. Therefore I am ~; requesting that the planning commission review the ordinance and its ;i` applicability if any to the window lighting at the Video Zone location and prior to February 28 which is the datejmt for the appearance an the citation and !' advise me of whether. or not tl) tj�-_ lighting requires a sign application to be a submitted,Ll. the first place and (2) whether or not the sign ordinance itself is overly broad in \iris applicatioa to interior lighting visible from the catsirlg.._ Please. direr, ;.;,car response aced any fi L-4er c;K 'Vn,t 3tions to my{ ffice and feel free to call me if you have a&stions. Sin ely, / �F `r. aces S. 1Davis CC. ichards David tax�ri%.chael` Vi opt) Zone a n,. . k 1 ,. gi eras - applicallon Name of establishment VIDEO ZONE Date Nov. 13, 1984 Address 8689 19th Street- Alta Loma, Ca. 91701 Applicant's name Phil & Brenda Goodman ------------ Address 1115 West Pster Street Upland, Ca. 91786 _Phone� (714);946_1149 Owner's Name Phil & Brenda Goodman Address same Phone same sign ion Number and type of sign(s) : j4all . M Temporary nument Canopy . ----0 Subdivision _X I-andow g Jniforn Sign Program _Ditcctjor�a_j Pedestrian Other j Size: Length Width Derth Overall HeiOr 0 Bldg. face Sq.Ft. Sion 1. / 0 9 Sign 2. 'j — Sign 3. Si-n 4. Sign S. Sign 6. 'rf temporary or subdivision, date of installation X/IA If temporary or subdivision, 'date of expiration a)� 4d Bond pmount and identification numbers ,(/j% Indicate'sign copy, size, color and materials on plans described on the reverse of this sheet. 'tion .:photo Approved _Denied 12 J BY l3. I - Ile Not Date'liecelved Re. eive4 Fee Receipt -No.-, 77. pea v. Q; i4g '1M.a #� *(s r - �apV►y4 q � i► ` Fir. -z� ..La' .a.`'�� dmLC �.V �'; cad` .• +C�n�..�'^' °,.fit � a 4��1 s �'� 14, 10ITTOFRANCUQCUCA2ViONGA.; ,y Aft� E, 2 N DATE: March 13, 185 tsrr To. Char',npn and Members of the Planning Cor iifssion FROM : - - Ri,.k Gomez, City Planner d :Y BY: Nataq Fong,' Assistant Planner SUt�JECT- LAND- -USE ANALYSIS FOR AREA. AT SOUTH SIDE OF WILSON, ZTWEEN YBERRY AVENUE AND HAVEN _AVENUE I. ABSTRACT: The purpose of this -eport is for the Commission to review, discuss, and providd_direcfion to Staff regarding Lain Use is -iues within the Loi,�-Medium Residential I Distr =`,,st located at the .outff side of Wilson, east of bayberry Avfnu*k-., , { II. BACKGROU46-:, In April; of 1981, the City Council adopted the C ty's AftV General Plan ,which designated the area surrounding Chaffay College for Low- i;edium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per- acre)', In January of 1984, the City,Council adopted the Davelopmtit\ Districts (Zoning) jaap to make all-"zoning within the City; consisieat to the- adopted Gi ,eral Plan as required, by. State ti=lai nirig,-Law. In Narch of 1984, a _par;-1 map was submitted by the develoI Ier� for a four;�3ot single fm i y subdfvisirA7. In order to comply with the City's ,.new Deveiopmeot CQd -e, Staff directed 'the developer to I redesign the proposed projm t, and to resubmit a tentative tract map (71"12851) for an eight -lot single fcmilw %tubd,5vision. Based- on Staff's reviews the proposed tabdivision is in %Jnformance with,,__!) be 'current CiVs General,, Plan and Develnpment 06 i`see Exhibit ' - However, a recent petition from the surrounding residents in response to this proposed, development has raised land use issues in regard to the designated Low - Medium (4 -8 dt;ac) density vor the entire area (South of Wilson, between Mayberry Avenue and Haven Avenue). This land use concern evolved, from the density t compatibility of the proposed devel0ment to the ex19V! ng one -half acre single,-family delte;opmeni, on the north.: side of.,W .jlso7, and custom homes on one -half 'acre minimum lot sizes along ° he 'slauth side of Wilson AM:'�, ITEM L PLANNING, COMMISSION STAFF `'REP C� Land Use Analysis March:,1� -1985. n f� Page 2 III. ANALYSIS."i' A. Surrounds a'Land Use: The &ea f "Mm centerline of bayberry XV_W46 Wes' t h Avttjue is de5i;gnatsd for LOW Res7den ia7 {2 -4 du /ac) and school.'sit''�. Area ,.north of ilson Avenue ?s designated f:.r Very -Low Residential with a.dasitu of uli.to 2 t dwelling units per acrea The `Area from centerline of Mayberry - Avenue east to Owen Avenue, including t%e project situ, is designated for 6w- Mediam Residential {4 -8 du /a.: }, -,and is primarily _undeveloped 'see Exhibit 'gA".) The area south of this study area has been approved for 294 single - family homes, W ranging from a 'tot sie of 4,010 square feet to 6,000 square r feet ( %ntative Tract ID827, `see Exhll its "A" and B. Exi st I inq Land UE� Areas:; north q( Wilson ''Ave;iue consi ��. of a mainly hal cre sing `e f&mily lath :fArea I on Exhibit r'3"j. Areas ,II an*t III {Ex 111- 1it'! =8 ='.1 consist of a m ;x of parcels and r ` sma;l i' two: -acre 4 parcels of, oae,- and size. number of these . Parcels are landlechtek without access to a »y public stroet" Many of these parr,.'Ts have exising, single family,homes of long time residents. At�o, on bath sides off Mayberry Avent ark :too - parcel maps witr ond� -half acre lots which wit *p *1 approved pl ;for " to the of adoption the D,evelapment districts Map, Since Area 7II has iraOquate circulation and draln4gge faclgities Frith a�'; gash Area towards the south, a Master ,"f :.;Overlay ilistriIt is, ae lgnated over this area. The,pdrpal eto as,-,ure a mot ous e�atianShSp brYtween e4isting and f =" rts se to coordij�ate' and -a 'promote the puhlis faci;ity impre s C. General Plan Policies:. Policies within the General Plan and . t e eye tapmer,i * 0 P stress neighborhood compatibility, Proiects matt be COMOt -4ble with and sensitiv4 to th`e immediate emfiironment of the site_and reigOorhood, proSect ges-i6,4s must . effecfis itigate the aesthetic confIicti" beiween a proposed dcvelopr. °- s`r's�rro�trdzng Lucid ujes.. Ir additfin the intent<o____ of tide G'E cc .di F1. s 4rZd RevOopmerit Code is to proms to proper;:. ". trAns "., ion of D. Issuest The pnimary , su :a to be consider et! by the Pianrl :no Commission is whether the currentr >tew-Xedlun r',enS-it of 4 -8 awel3ir q Nits er sere is Emma I e wits fanned 3andT' use and t e a rcrp� ate desi nation. The t, fol,7,V,'`ng',lternatives should be c id dd ,',cons l ring ��nts� iSii'.r' ✓ T�;3i v /� J" PLANNIHC COMMISSION STAFF REPORT � Land Use Analysis March 13,.1565 1, Page 3 _ } 1. Redesignate the entire area (Area II. and; III of r Exhibit- I'D") for Very - Low " Residential (1 -2 duiac): Coulo provide for density compatibility to the existing one --half acre single family -. homo north of bliison Avenue and those within tbis� arch as well as maintaining the very low densi +y charter of this - 'vould area. However,,the developer of TT 12851 Lave to resubmit a parcel map for a 4- let "suhdivision.?J 2. Redesignate. 'Area _ ,III r ,(Exb1bgt 9011) For low Residentia #' (2 4: d4iic) ` `Could - provide for proper transition of .'ersity with Tot size ranging from one - half acre 'to one.- quarter acre, ,, However-,4 this increase in density could have jbr impact` an the,\, circulation and drainage improve�nen�ts'� A Master Plan,. of srach pubTic facilities by f+jture�developers' would" r'rsol'xe access—arid drainage props em;, for those j land 4&ed parce�,, <, The developer,',,`ecsld still prF ess"�,a subdivision of up to a maximum, of 8 lots nr tr��oiiona7 Stand &rds. llitm '-' 3. No "rede,,4gnation for Area Incompatibility to existing and adjacent onE hal� acre single facti Ty homLG. <; Although the apR-yiv,-sd subdivision south of _ this area is developed utrd4i the 1_q,,:-'Medium dt nsity standards, the proposed east -west ii�-eet ).o.:-abed at the northe,n boundary served as'a natural divider. The. seconoar issue is whiRiher Staff _ can�ccmplete to oseddi'entatzve x.2851 Frocessin Twact— while farther study is requl`re to address the. -above 1ar3nc ' use Issue. 1 IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Planning Commission review all of the infarriatl&,. nresentYd -. in this report. if the ` Planning Commios;on fells-, hatj Lotv�Medium Residential is appropriate, they` di.cctl;staff omp?ete processing Tentative Tract 12 -,51. lf% the ` feels i,tbt L-t_iu , Residentia is in opp %,ce,` then di>> ect Staffll to inW:ti? a General Plan Ameodme,'t; id [P4elopment D!' trict Amerldment. F ct 1T ,,,,bm i teds ` "0� i ick mez pity. Ann _. PLANflING COrHIS5I0U STAFF REPORT .and Ut e Analysis Flarch 13F 19'55 ti rr Page 4 Attachme.r}s,: Exhibit "A" .:.Lard Use Map �r Exhibit "B" - location Map Exhibit. "G" „ - Tentative'Tract 22851 Exhibit "D "'= Area Under Consideration for Gen {dal Ply Amendment Petition from Residents r 7 At Wt MAH . _ RACT 12851 ` i . i 0 CL.hT. T - -YlwgZ � TAU14t � it9•hRNq r -.. y -� 1 "$WIL80N� AVENUE 1 C -,• •r„i cwc..cr. i i S4 �. f�r�:iriir $ r of MRTU IVIO- §4 -Peter L. and Sylvia J, Granger +. 5718 Mayberry Avenue:, °ff Rancho Cucamonga, California.. 91730 _ .II ' January 21, 1985 Mr, Rick Gomez, City Planner l Post Office Box $07 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 RE: •Zone change Dear Mr. Gomez. As a new resident "of Rancho Cucamonga, I have just learned`of some bad news. As You know, there bare been some very recent zone changes in my neighborhood, particulatlq with the parcel owned by David Bowdon. I am. displeased with the `lone changes across the street from my new f. home at 5738 Mayberry Avenne(corner of Wilson and)*( berry). I have c built a, 8300,000.00 house of which I am living in on a city required one -half acre lot, I also ocac the three one -half acre lots adjacent to this address xeferred tows Parcel, Hap 5795. { i I found out that the city, of Rancho Cucamonga rezoned to property east of me without any notification to the resit_ .,;My neighbors, j Mr Jack Jones, Ur. Tim Tones and Mr. Bill Jones, who Have lived ' bete for 15 •ears can also attcrt to this. If I had known about the zone change medium and high density), 1 would have fought it a1 the way because of my investment into my land as one -half acre lots as required by the city at the time of devels ;ing any parcel. I initially desired one - quarter acre lots but was required to suucl'vida into one--ha1j� acre lots. Now, one- quarter acre lots are: :beiag allowed rigbt next to me. ` As you are probably aware, randy and Sandy Davis are currently building ?� a $350,300.00 house for heir use on a one -half acre lot which is. ` also ca at 6,f me and located, in the,middle of the zone change, Tiey "Rave expressed their serious concern to me, about the zone change. ` The = %itats zone change is rot ac:captable tJ me and other families ` living in this area as it is obvious why. We certianly want tai main- t. � tain our nei bborhood uniformly with g comparable lots /fend hou;?,ys. Il We would like to request your review of this matter #horough�,g because a it is of great importatice to me and also the other des donts tA my ndighborhood; ) x \_ Peter L. and Syly4a I. Granger Page Two Rick Gomez, b—lay Planner, . T,puary 22, 2985 v� ` Your prompt attention to this totter is appredia!'edt Please sei, ;ond to 'me by -letter as 7 am unavailable for your telephoue call during your_ working hours. Or. You may let me know i,£ you, would rather m!pet with me. Yours trul Peter i. Granger sjg cc:'S Jon Mikels, May of Rancho) Cucamonga tf O 0 ff , k !! LIST OF RESIDENTS OF RANCHO CUC MONGA. AGAAST ZONE CHANGE l/ NAME ADDRESS J) SIGVA' ft _- G/��' �.Jo�c= t.' u �':�?5`r1 ttlwc.�tcli' L -Cc-f. Vic:•' J /�"„f) ,?tc�_ -(.Ct k ��i,�s eA. C. O t 1, e45 otj - n6� r'slc Ile ►`4w,r.w S. fl(1J� _ J�791 Aollfv IA t _D c 6 Y-�- cyttt -t I to , *ac LKA 10qal Ad A-4 r AL -15 i 13 =p MQG4e [ 5419 Roe re ,Afire. CrEY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA vCAAr STAFF REPORT, o� ?� J: z v Y t DATE: March 13, 1985- 1977 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs City Enoineer BY: Shintu,.Bose, Assoei ate Civil Eng; ter SLWECT :. IN1ERiM REPORT ON ETIWANDA SPECIFIC AUA DRAINAGE: FLAK AND DEVELOPMElIT POLICIES BACKGROUND i, Recognizing the inadequacy of drainage and flood control facilities to support any development, the City Council on November 7, 1984, imposed a moratorium in the Etiwanda Specific Plan Area for 'a period of fo,(r months to fi`,jow preparation of a Master Planned Storm Drain and Development Policies for,.. area. r; With the concerted effort by the City Staff and the Civil Engineering Consultant, Williamson & Schmid of Irvine, an interim report has been prepared to address those issues and to propose policies to implement the ",Iaster Plan.,- A copy of the interim report is attached for your review. ANALYSIS The report proposes two alternate alignments for the Master Planned Storm Drains for year consideration_ Cor the purpose of settini development policies, the area has been delineated into eight (8) subareas; based on its unique drainage criteria. Each subarea has separately been aMressed iti -twe report. Also included in the report is; a rQcommendation for imp,�ementation of those policies. The report was presented to the Etiwanda Drainae Advisory Committee for review and discussion at their meetings on, Kebruary 28 and March 8, 1485, This interim report specifically deals with the storm drain (system and associated development policies. Presently,- Federal Emergency Management Agency (FF14A) is in the process of preparing a Fl6od Hazard Map for the area.: This map is expected to be published shortly. TheJEMA guidel rtes ,will impose certain restrictions on development in areas subject to flooding. xt is envisioned that those areas abutting Etiwanda Creek and Ats spreat.ng if ground and the drainage area tributary to the San SevaineBas�n will eve major impact., due to flooding. More restrictive development pOices. may have to be imposed ow those ;ras to conform to FEMF policies. !� #,LANNINC GMSSION STAFF REPORT interim Report on Etiwanda Specific Area Drainage Plan and Developrr..nt Policies March 13, 3985 Page 2 � RECG9ENDATION It is recummended_Pat the Planning Commission adopt' the resolution.,' ,att,lched' reproving the Ini_�rim prailk age Plan and Development Pa i,,s fbr, Etiw noa Specific Area and rec�p"nd adoption' of the same by, the -C'#I CounciI XT ° City of Rancho Cb% n amoga.` � -Vi 61 Re .pectfully� stitted, _ ;> f *;*P; "-141H a Attachments _ i t r n o n � . r, e .�'�> �j 4 , c � . ii AOV'1ORY 'COMITTEE. _ MWAq�� DRAINAGE FLAN CF,uck Burauet — Ranch(= Cucamonga, City 'Cotinciitaemur r • ty Merman Rempel - Ranch6 Akrtga R'u'nning Commissioner ~ JimZanks, Ranwho Ckamdnga Citiz€ns. Advj ory Commission l "Wayns Blanton — Newton fealty, Fomor a s -�\ Allan Kie7hald, San Be.; rdino CO-jnty Transportation and o Riood�rol DistriCtr" a . Cary Lowe, f; w s Homes,(, VgTa d r Gerry ant � �' � � Lewis' limes., Upland Joseph Dilorio, Tftz �'aryn Co., Rancho Cucainonga s 1 0 r J y � � 0701 -02 o 3 -13 -85 PC Agenda o 4,of 4 RESOLUTION ND. ,0 3 A""RESOLUTItHV OF THE, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RA100 CUCAMONGA,: CALIF{;t,RHIA, APPROVING THE INTERIM DRAINAGE PLAN AND s EVEWPMENT POLICIES IN ETIWANDA SPECIFIC AREA AND R OMMENDINO ADOPTION Gf THE SAME BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITS" OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WHEREAS, on November 7, 1984, the City 'Council of the City of Rancho R Cucamongat passed and adopted an Ordinance establishing a moratorium on a development in the Etwianda Specific Plan Area to allow ft the preparation of Drainage -Plan and Development Policids for that Area; and °' ✓ WHEREAS, an interim report on Drainage Plan and Development Policies rf for the Area has been prepared by a Civil Engineering Consultant contracted by the City; and p WHEREAS, on March �J, 1985, rhe,Planning Commission held a hearing;to review and consider the report. NOW. THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS that the interim report on Drainage Plan and Development,lolicies for the Etiwanda`Specific,PlanArea is hereby;,nvroved and re(°Omends' adoption flf the interim report by the City CoanciI�pi *Pt, City of Rancho Cucamonga. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13Tki; ?,y OF MARCH. 1985. PLANNING COMMISSION; OF THE CITY OF RANCF r: ?Altf''VXSA " Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Ri ck Gonez, Deputy Secretary .. I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary ;of the Planning Com'�ssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoin0esolution was duly and regularly introduced, {sassed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cuemonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of arch, 1985, by the following vote- too -wit; AYES: COMMISSIONERSt :{ NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT.- COMMISSIONERS; FM 5 eD W� 1� /}J (? a- e LAW OFFICES OF l ` BEST,BEST & KRtEGSEFt: - MEk0iAN'DUM �J TO CI49RMAN, AGENCY MEMBERS AND DIRECTOR 'FROM: BOND COUNSEL,, DATE: 3AN?tARY 2, -3 85 %L1E RE; CERTIFICATE PARTICIPATION FINANCING OF CIVIC CENTER ASSOCIATES COMMERCIAL PROJECT 5taff::has received a proposal from Civic Center Associates (the "Developer ") for the Ag=cy's assistance in the tax - exempt financing of the- acquisition and construction ' "{ `., of an approximately) -h,000 square foot office\ building (the "Project ") proposed to be located °on Civic Center Drive in the Rancho Redevelopment Project Area. Tie Developer has submitted an application and financial 'statements in connection with the Project, which have been 'reviewed. ;9 A tax-exempt financing mechanism that the Agene}`„,\ J may make available to the Dey��lop is an installment sale \ = o financing arrangement, including the issuance= of certificates.--- ,-:`1 of participation_- Under this financing arrangement, the Agency would "acquire" the Project from a',third-party seller pursuant to an installment sale agreement (tile "r-xxgt Installment Sale Agreement ") and immediately "resell it" to the Developer pursuant to au 'identical second installment sale agreement (the "Second Installment Sale Agreement"). it CAW OFFICES OF i ' BEST, BEST KRIEGER. r3 January 2 1985ul Page 2 Certificates of participation ( "Certificates ") would then he prepared and sold which would evidence proportionate interests in the obligation of the Agency to make installment payments,under the 'First Installment Sale ,Agreement for the purpose ;of providing funds for the acquisition and construction of the Pjoject. The obligation of the Agency to make such installment payments would be a 1xmit4d obligation and would entail no financial liability on the hart of the Agency. The sole responsibility for repayment would rest with the Developer, who would have an �rt2ntical obligation to make installment payments -under the( �aond Installment Sale Agreement. It a,j likely that this obligation of the Developer would be further secured by a,letter'of credit or other 'Isecu, ity enhancement" device from lending or credit institution for the purpose of enhancing the marketability of the Certificates. In the event the Agency is willing to consider 0 making thi6 =inanei'ng mechanism available to ` the Developer, it is first necessary for the Agency to adopt a resolution indicating=1ts intent to issue such Certificates or other similar tax - exempt obligations. This is a requir�rment of federal tax.law relating to these types of tax- ezezupt obligations. This tax provision Mates; tliat a developer ,j c„ L6 P' - t+4 4 LAW [OFFICES OF B EST, BEST & KRIEGER January 2; 198.5 - . page 3 may;,only use tax- exempt monies for costs paid or.neurred for a project after the date of the adoption of such a • 1 resoli*ti.on of intention,. 0 Attached f ;r your consideration is a -Proposed , resolution of intention which satisfies this federal tax requirement. Adopiionc:if this resolution does not obligate the Agency to��roceed with the issuance of certificates of Participation if, at some layer time, it decides that it would be unIIesFFrable to do so. Rather, adoption of this 1t _ resolution is only a, preliminary step in �nnection_with' the financing of tha'`project. 1 Prior to the issuance nf'the C4jaficates, a number of other things must: o".ur." First, the Developer will have to proceed to finalize a financing, package wish an underwriter and a credit institution. Second,it will be necessary.to secure an allocation from the California Debt Limit: A.11ocatioa,. -__ Committee for then:Certificates. The 'Fax Reform`ict of 1984 imposes a requiremen3 that the total dollar amount of a1Z private activity bond ,�,` such as the Certificates that 'are, proposed to be issued, will not exceed limits imposed by that n law. The City rf, Rancho Cucamonga presently is ax4aiting its allocation from the California Debt Limit Allocation Committee` + for 1986. In t:ee event this allorc tion is not sufficient to ? `fit G `-.; y d T } y!y �'+'4:� s%'aA3Y ♦.. .. wF:_kf:'f�.Yhw°x.a s � L ... .3aitrs.i � �� .. .. r ._ ..°��ir_ Q '" LAW OFF[CCS }` QE A' BEST, BEST & K$,IEGCR January 2,,--'1985 i- Page 4 r cover the financing a� t: 11 Project (and any other such :s projects proposed for tax - exempt financing in the City ) , it wily be necessary to obtain an additional allocation, t' either from another local jurisdiction or frorri the - State. wr Jobj�) L. B - wn Francis J. Baum i i y `' s� �s wr rt C kEGOLUTION NO.. A RE$OLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA ONGA INDICATING ITS INTENT TO PROVIDE FOR.TI�ESSUANCE OF OBLIGATIONS AND THE INSTALLMr�iyGT SAFE FINANCING OF A COMbSkCIAL P#OJECT EY CIVIC CENTER ASSOCIATES WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga: (the 64gency ") is authorized pursuant to the Community Redevelopment Law, being Section 33000 and following ` of the Health and 'Safety Code of the State of California (the "Act's) (i.) to purchase property, both real anti personal, and any interest therein for purposes of redevelopment in a redevelopment project area; (ii) to sell or otherwise dis' pose j w of any property, both i,: al and personal, and any interest therein for purposes,!%of redevelopment in a rede4elopment " project area; and (�ii) to make and execute contracts and ' ether instruments newer convenient to the exercise of its powers; and -', WHEUAS, Civic Center Associates, a,�California " N• partnership (the "Developer "), has requested a )sistance in r. the financing of the acquisition and construcZn of an- approximately 20,000 square foot office„ build proposed to be located on 1.4 acres on Civic Center Drive (the "project "), all located in the Rancho Redevelopment Project Area of the Agency'(the "Project Area "); and WHEREAS, said financing is proposed to be provided by :means of the Agency entering into an installment sale arrangement with r+4s ,pect to the Project, including the f issuance of certificates of.participation or by means of the Agency otherwise issuing tax - exempt obligations (said certificates or obligations being collectively referred to as the 'Obligations "); WHEREAS, the Agency, in order to encourage economic 111 development and employment opportunities within the Project Area and as an aid and inducement to the Developer, is willing to authorize the issuance of the Obligations in an amou nt j r� sufficient to provide financing for the Project sub3Pct to ll the restrictions of the Act and all 23�,p'licable California and federal laws as they presently exist; provided that the Project receives all necessary governmen. approvaxa of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; IOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Redevelopme2t Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamanga'as follows: Section 1. F:Lidings. This Board hereby determines _Y that the undertaki7i of the financing of the Project by the Agency will be a ,substantial factor in the accrual of public benefits to be received from the Project, should the Project be approved and construdted, and that the proposed financing is in accord with 'the purposes and xectuirements of the Act. f f2— k'1 s E, , Section 2. Issuance o£ Obligations. Subject to the V completior_ of the proceedings �3nd other matters relating thereto to the full satisfact`�n of this Board, and subject r �-to the Project receiving all tecessary local governmental approvals, this Board hereby agrees to provide financing to r the Developer or such -other person or entity approved by the :n Agency for tfte Project through the issuance of Obligations as describ4d in this resolution in aas amount not to exceed $1,900.( /Q0. < Section 3. Nature of Obligations. The Ob14-gations to "ae issued shall', be special obligations of the Agency ' payable solely from installment payments or other revenues to be received by the Agency pursuant to all ",agreement:; E (including any installment sa;e "agreement with the Developer) in connection with the financing of the Project, all-:.In a form acceptable to th (Ageni�y, and shall not be a gene al a obligation of the AgenCj(, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the ` State of California, or Many, political subdivision thereof. Section 4. Official Aetion k,l Jt_ i.s intended that this Resolution shall constitute "some other similar official action" toward tLe` issuance of indebtedness within the {Weaning u of section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, and the regu2;At ons thereunder, a f -3- ' C' S v 7 I ; Section �.i �E3thcr; Approvals, The adoption of -this - Resolution shall not bind the lgency ,to issue certificates of participation, 'bonds or other obligations until a-ad unless 1a F all oth�r necessary actions and approvals are taken ox received in accordance with all applicable laws. The adoption ` of this Resolution {'Ies not and shall not limit in any manner~ - whatever the Agency`s and the City of Rancho Cucamonga".s full discretioTCt" Y deny any further, hermit, or apprpval that may be necessary for ultimate completion of the prgposed.,r Project. In this connection: i (a) All coat -acts relatiag to of !f i j } ., acquisiit mx, construction, installation and equipj -gig of the i Project shall be solicited, negotiated, awarded and executed by the Developer, for its own account, subject to applicable federal. state and local. laws. E (b) The Agency and the City Of Rancho Cucamonga.,-,hall have no pecuniary liebllity:,to the Developer, for any fees It. connection with the Project. (c) The Agency and the City of izanche Cu�,amon a shall recover any mid all costs to the Agency or the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as applicable, which are U Incurred in furtherance of or attributable to the issuance of the Obligations. If the ObX .gations are not issued, all • such costs shall be paid by the Developer. �a .tie a ` g W ti n �ection 6. w' Vfective D3!x*$. i ThL%,r�esoiuOon shall take effect ( `ately upnza *adcgt�on�>. f ADOPTM this day of January' 1985. t ut the Re eve opment ,Agency of the City of Rancho . Cucamonga, California i 34TZRST: , Secretary or the Redevelopment _ \` Agency of the City of Rancho Cucawnga, California i ' a a \� y W I, 14MEN M. WASSERMAN, Secretary of t" deVi�opmettt' { Agency of the City of Ranoho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the fartgoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the Redevelopment Agency of the City bf- Rancho Cucamonga, Californi-�, at a regular meeting thereof „held on the day of JanuU y, 1985, by the following vote of thg Agency: a k. AYES: s NOES- ABSENT: ABSTAINED //I IN I- WITNESS WHEIREGF, I have hereunto set my hand and � affixed the official seal of the Redevelopment Agen of the ffa City of Rancho Cucamonga, `dalifornia this day of January, 1985 ecretary of e Re eve opment ;' 1` Agency'of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,. California (i 1 ,a \� _6— m likso TTION No. A RESOLUTION OF TH,F, REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY n OF THE CITY OF UiZ:110- CUCAMONGA. INDICATING J ITS INTENT TO PROVIDE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF `. OBL=kTIONS AND THE INSTALLMENT SALE J FINANCING OF A COMMERCIAL PROTECT BY A. H. REITER DEVELOPMENT CO. WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency 'of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the_ ',Agency ") is authorized pursuant o the Community Redevelopment Law, being Section 3300D and fallowing of the Health and Safety.Code of the State „of California ' (the "Act ") (i) tol�urchase property,,. Gth. real and p=ersonal, and any interest therein for purposes of redevelopment in a redevelopment project area, (ii) to sell or otherwise disposes 'and of any property, both real and personal, any interest ,. therein for pw`poses of redevelopment in *a redevelopment pro :pct area; and (iii:) to make and execute contracts ',and other instruments necessary or convenient to the exercisi_ of its powers;,=� � U WHEREAS, A. H. Reiter Development Co. (the "Devjl&per 'l'j has requested assistance in the financing of the acquisition and construuettca of four office buildings each containing approximately 18,000 square feet proposed to be located din ' 5.6 acres at the northeast corner of 7th and Haven (the "Project "), all located in the Rancho Redevelopment Pro3e�t 1� o; Area of the Agency (the 'Project Area "), and : Irv. i'� k+e• • WHEREAS, said financing is proposed to be pr6'vided _r by meax( of. the Age -,V intering into an installment sale Lys gr�, ;,j � arrangement with xespect to the Px11ject, including the issuance of certificates' "of participation or b- '.leans of the Agency otherwise issuing tax - exempt obligaaic.ns'(sai4t certificates or obligations being collectively referred to as the "Obligations "); WHEREAS, the Agency, in order to encourage economic development and employment opportunities within the Project Area and as an' . d`and inducement to the Developer, is willings to e5 >c�horize the assnce of the Obligations in an amount sufficlent to provi•� financing for the�Projo�:t subject to the restrictions Act and all applicable California 0,f,�,_3;he and federal laws as they presently exist-, provided thst the Project receives all necessary local governmental approvals, of the cit'r of Rancho Cucamonga, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Re,Oevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows : , Section 1. findings. This Boar& hereby determines that the undertaking of the financing of the Project by the Agency will be a substantial factor in the accrual of public benefits to be received from the Project, should the Project be approved and constructed, and that thexoposed financing is in accord with the purposes and requirements of the Act.„ F i 3 e T I Se( tiou Z. Issuance of Obligations. Subject to the Completion of the proceedings and other matters relating thereto to the full satisfaction of this B4, rd, and subjact to the Project receiving all necessary locaL governmental I approvals, this Board hereby agu a -, to provide financing to the Developer or such other person or entity approved by the Agency for the Project through t e issuance of Obligations 11 as described in this resolution in an amount not to exceed $3,771,000. Section 3« Nature of Qblijations. The Obligations to' be issued shall be special obligattions of the Agency payable solely from installment paymgntsi or other revenues to be received Liar the Agency pursuant to all,agreements (.�ncluding any installment sale,agreQment - with the Developer) in connection with the financing of the Project, all in=a form acceptable' to the Agency, "and sli#Il not be a general obligation of the Agency. the City of Rancho Cucamonga-, the State of California, or any political subdivision thereof. Section 4. Official Action,, It is intended that ' this Resolution shall constitute "some other similar official action" toward the issuance-of indebtedness within the meaning of Section 103 of the,Inzernal Revenue Code of 1954, -as amended, and the regulations; thereunder.` ~ e Section, 5. tither Aparovals:. The adoption of this Resolution shall not bind the Agency to issue certificates of participation, bonds or other obligations until and unless all other necessary actions and approvals are taRen or receives!;; in accordance with all applicable laws. The adoption of this Resolutt,-3, does not and shall note limit in any manner whatever the.Ag�tcy'_s and tie City of x,zrtho Cucamonga's fti 1, discretion to gieny any further permit or 1 approval that may be necessary r ultimate completion of i the proposed Project. Z*t. this f onnectionc (a) All contracts relating to the acquisition, construction, installation and equipping of the Project shall be solicited., negotiated, 'awarded and executed by the Developer, for '#s own account, subject to applicable I - federal, state and local laws, (b) The Agency and the C'ty of Rancho Cucamongs,sball''have no pecuniary liability to the Developer for any fees in connection with the Project.'V {c} The Agency and the City of Rancho Cucamonga shak3 recover any and all costs to the Agency or the-'City of Rancho Cucamonga, as applicable, which are incurred in furtheranc - of or attributable to the issuance of the Obli:)tAt onis. If the Obligations are not issued, all- such casts shall be paid by the Developer, e _y_ Section 6. Effective Date. This Resolution jr shall take effect immediately upon adoption ADOPTED this d'ay :of J ary, 1985 Cr ai.rm a t e etc eve opment r Agency l f the City of Rancho Cucamonga. California _ c i. ATTEST. J Secretary of the Redevelopment ~ �r Agency of the City of Rancho 1 Cucamonga,` California .'Z a o U e, ,. w LAUREN Mr WASSIMUW4', Secretary of the r Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cuc;ti;aonga, California, do hereby certify that the fc>xe'toitxg Resolution ,'was regularly introduced and adopted by the Redevelopment Agency of the City-of Rancho Cue&,monga ° California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the da'y„ of January* 1985, by the following vote' oE. he Agency: c LL AYES: tj NOES • _. ABSENT: ABSTAINED: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my band and affixed the official seal of the Redevelopment Agency of the CiLyi!of Rancho Cucamonga, California this dap' of January, 1985. &ecretary-o the Re eve ogment Agency of the City Qf Rancho , Cucamongay G`alifornia ..6_ y �k a