The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1985/03/27 - Agenda Packet'o 701 -02 0 3� -27 -85 PG Agenda o 1 ,of 4 CHQ, CLCAMO \rA ; ,. PL ANNE. r C SSION .: I977 1' WEDNESDAY' March 27, 1985 7:00 p.m.; MONS PARJ'POMKUNrTY CENTER 91 61 BASE IAE 71APTC HO CUCAMONGA, CALIP'ORRU ;, { G n L Pledge of Allegiance 4 IL Roll Call ' Commissioner Barker Commissioner Hempel Commissioner Chitiea ' Comm, Stqut .. Commissioner. Mlekiel`..,, I[L Announcement : k IV. Consent Calendar 1 ;- The fallowing Consent are expected to be routine atml non-controversial. Th rill bo) �rcLed orb by the Commission at One time without discussia , 1 � Vyone has over any item, ,poncern it should he removed for A. ENMoNM.ENTAL, ESSMLSNT FOR DEVELOPMENT w 84-5& , isSEhCxER - Construction Of a 42,8 20 . C square foot conerete tilt -up Mading for industrial use on 2.t acres located on the northeast corner of Elm and EuealyptM7 " Avenue in the Industrial Speaifie Plan area (Subaae&:9 7, Industrial Park)- APN 4 �J8- 351 -37< . ` (;J < B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT �'OR DSVELOPII NT RE IEw 85-02 -PEP BOYS development of a retail ` automotive sales /service department of 21828 sgriace feet located �n the northwest corner of Hellman Avenue , and " Foothill Boulevards on appro$imatelj 1.87 acres, of Iartti the within tleneral Commerelal Biatriet - APX 20"Z2 _048. T z>•-�. , ., may, s„x.< # n *: /( . x' Vd Public Hearin ) fih�k following items are public he• rfnga ` v+ ich concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the, re r roject. Plow woit to be recognized by the Cha(rrnan and ad re3�n- G;itnmission by stating your name "and address. .All ions shall be lim ,Fed to 5 mi p tes per individual for each prcr eot. } I(].� C. EIiVIR(I�iMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE � PERMIT 84 -3I, ^ ' DIYERSIPIED PROPERTIES The development of an inte ,cted: shopping center of approximately 118,988 squarq feeg vahich includes a gasoline service station, as proposed T�'hase l and a conceptual master pla-i for future phases. ALL on approximately 15 acres of land in the Neigborhood Comhnercial (NCi District, generally- `A ` located on the northeast corner of Highland Avenue and Haven Avenue - APN 201- 241 -53. (Continued from Vebilir' y 27, x985 meeting.) ° D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL= PLAN WMEENDMENT 85 -01 -B - TAC DEVELOPMENT ° A General Piari Ame ndment front Medium :Residential -14 du/ae) to High Residential (24 --�0 dii /ac) for s senior citizen apartment projeet on 4.15 acres of lend locate, on the west side of Aiiiethvst, north of 19th Street - APN 2#11 - 212 -24. E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT D 'TRICT AMENDMENT 85 -01 -TAC DE LOPMENT - -:� Development'Distript amendment from Medium ResY3er.. (4 14 du/ac) to High Residential (24-30 du/ac) and Senior Housing,Overla y (( istri for a senior citizen apartment project r�.� 4.75ares oT land located on the west ;side of Amethyst, north of 19th Street - APN 201.232 -24. g, RONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMEl4?` �w 85-01 - TAC DEVELOPMENT - The deveiopment of ° a saor citizen housing projeet t ,gs jng ?68 apartmsAA units r on 4.75 acres of rand in the Medium Kesidential District, . (proposed High Residentiai/Semor Housing 4ive6ay District) to be located on the West side of Ameth"�"t; norili of 19t1a Street - AFN 201 - 232 -24. . G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AITD DZiVELCIIxMT,iI�T <, ° AGREEMENT - TJC DEVELOPMENT - A Deve% t w Agreement between the Ctq of Icho Cucamonga;art Development. Corporation regarding a senior c4then housing project to be locateiI on the +nFest side of AmOO t ! �) 19th to ` Aj?Y 1-231-4j. Y H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85 -01 - RANTER - The development of a 45,000 square foot retail shopping ,e, enter on 5.1 acres of land 11tH the General Commercial District located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Ramona Avenue. r APN 1UdI- 622 - 29, 30, 33. L ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVS�RACT 10349 -ANA CAL _ A toxal residential developmentu .Qf 53 �! single atni'� 1y lots on 334 net acres of land in the Very Low Residential,lZistcfet (1 -2 du/ac), located west of Sapphire Street, soot. /of Jennet Street - AP14 1043 -22l- 3,,1062461 1, and 1062 - 011-3. i" VL Old Businesst rj J. P!OWgV` DETERMINATION FOLLOW -UP - DVVELOPMEPiT' -. CRITERIA FOR OFFSITE LOADING FACILITIES V€L New Business JLL� rk ` K. MINOR DEVEL( ENT REVIEEW ' 85 -03 9ABR2C Devitopment of 1"arking spaces with full improvements on w Parcel 1 of P'areel Map 6194, located south of 7th Street, between Raven and Utica Avenues within Subarea 6 ,of the ' Industiial Area Specific Plan.: - APN 2G9 -411 -002. L. AREA TtEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR VICTORIA GROVES r " VILLAGE - A conceptual development plan for Victoria Graves Village, a 172.5 acre portion of the Victoria Planned Community, located on the west side, of Milliken Avenue, south of Righiand Avenue and noith of the Pacific Electric railroad tracks - APN 20-- 211 -13, 38 40,41 and 202- 221 -9 M. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ' AND DEVELOPMNT Gc3DE. AMENDMEW 85.01 - An at�fendmenY ttF -the ,Raticho h Cucamonga Development Code, Title 17 of t`te Municipal 10ode, regarding Master flans. 0 VIII. Public Comments This "is :rte time and place for the general puWa *to address the Commission. Items to be disattsssd here ;ore #;hose vh dlr 614wlt ; air � appear on this agenda. r TX. .Adjournment E - -The 2urtrting f'•'ttmmission tors adoFiteaT Actrmrcist-fttive that, s l I p:tri ad;�ittrtt emt ntj' 1teTxtso r P - ttirip3• i is r 3tttt Imo' item€ only lViDa i ze ortieni 4 ire t' e i..T. v a4 1 - F VK1z-,y3N9Ty,` 'MAP, € r..i 1 k4� FNb1R. Fnctu+Krwk�Ctttw� ; $ All i LION ►AR�} CI71'yT1AL4 ! ! t'' t` •� s . . s Y R �. ■W « , i CUGfLONFA- 1S LYk.SAS. UNft' REDiDHkI PAPK � - OAtAAfO:: t#7EA#AitO #AL AryiPDAi�: i i �• _ _. per. _ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, STAFF REPORT a U > 1977 DATE: March 27, 1985 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner 8f; Howard L. Fields', Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL 'ASSESSMENT FOR AEVELOPMEHT REVIEW 84 -56 MESSENGER IIFI�! TAT - €br cons,Gruction of a ,O square foot, concrete, tilt -up buiiding for industrial /research and development use on 2.49 acres, located on southeasa corner of, Elm and Eucalyptus Avenue in the Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 7 Industrial Park). - APN 208- 351 -' 37. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:, A. Action Requested: Approval of ; precise' site plan and architecture design, and issuance of a Negative Declaration." B. Ar ose: Development of a 42,820 square foot building for Industrial /Research and development. C. Location: Southeast corner of Elm and Eucalyptus Avenue. v. Parcel Size: 2.49 acres E. Existing Zoning: Industrial Park (Subarea 7) # _� F. Existing Land Use: Industrial G. Surrounding Land Use and Zonim North - Existing Schwin,_Facility, Industrial Park South - Vacant, Industr�41 Park East - Vacant, Industrial Park West - Vacant, Industrial Park H. General Plan Des�ns: Project Site - Industrial Park North - Industrial Park' G South - Industrial Park East - Industrial Park West - Industrial Park_ ITEM R' PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT - DR -84 -56 -March 27, 285 Page #2 I, Site Characteristics: Project site is a rectangular shaped corner lot that slopes to the,'south at approximately a 2 -3 grade.'` This sjte has been r-n, gt aded and is cleared of indigenous weeds and shrubs. Ttiere are existing street and 'the utilities to site: IL. ANALYSIS: j A. General: The project proposal is situated upon a corner lot f that w 1 provide visual impact along Elm Street° throughfare. The project consists of one large Speculative Industrial Bu;lding that is envisioned to accommodate 2 major, tenant users. The building layout offers maximum flexibility for conversions from two major tenant to 3 -4 multi - tenant users. This review is for environmental assessment only and the City Planner will approve the project-with condition's` should a Negative Declaration 'be issued. 8, Environmental Assessment- Part of the Initial Study has eel - complete by tie applicant.. Staff has c+.mpleted- the Environmental Checklist and determined that no significant environmental impact will occur as a result of this project, therefore issuance - of a Negative Declaration would be appropri at ��r" J I I. RECOMMENDATION: If the Planning Commission concurs;,with the Environmental Al §essment, then issuance of a Negative Declaration would be approprliate —,,_1 - , - J% I Respectful submfited, y\ JJ Rik Gomez City Planner RG'iF: cv - Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Nap Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Exhibit %'d" -- Landscaping Plan Exhibit "E" - Elevations !T Ex1ibit "F" - Conceptual Grading Plan . Initial Study; Part II _ j'% If 45t) LFj' at M. t III. 7, CIRCULATION TRAILS/ROUTES _ 120' R.O.W. 0000 Pedestrian � Creeks & Channels momm 100' R.O.W. ***9" Bicycle Brldge .. 88' or less R.Q.W. r�'t L'7G Regional ! iu ultl -lies "'�` Access Points RAIL SERVICE t Snecial Strwetscaosf t-q+s ' +++-f-i- Existing Landscaping park` + + + + +a Proposed Power Line/ utility Easement i !`URTH CITE'' OF ITEM: %HMO CUCAMONGA TME: PLANNING '61VEM J r • r � � III 7/ N > E 9 - � i s i�f �i Ir r 1 ip r I f Es W " ai V.Lv twAr "Aux urr as R rae+•ewwr r.ws. • .:.rock oMtpmm% kroormw eowwt. 111; i 1 ti!+ i .wens WCAM30". exvonr A TO ,r ' 'J e>MUmua m. j� fit r' ' ?i 1 4 � _ L t I i ° i o r a9SB� (1 j j v _c j z I i N '� S. II ;• �u� °oo / R i -M CUCAmm" FOR 3 SA vmx PAlKMMG aeersr7®IrER ,••• :svwexumw i e" ; j 4 'YJ�t R B 0 BuRn MCi e o i o�u hex -iaao �'� R a p ia x . bX s NAko v JR Moll'o architects idAtvcnka+ rfiattxvaswm .,wit>&274IIkv9na,canNtBTXti ftt438$3-iT7 5011GU1if 7ttC3et :tdt1103 0 41013 rFki til8rrrs7i ,12 �BpS) 395.3bt9 0 oa 7: A r o Vic` a p ia x . bX s NAko v JR Moll'o architects idAtvcnka+ rfiattxvaswm .,wit>&274IIkv9na,canNtBTXti ftt438$3-iT7 5011GU1if 7ttC3et :tdt1103 0 41013 rFki til8rrrs7i ,12 �BpS) 395.3bt9 0 a ( � i r! .z 141 ; l • T d °s1 M1 n'. a V g a ( � i r! .z 141 ; l • T d °s1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA..%OXA PART TI - INITIAL STUDY ENVIRON:'TAL CHECi"f.IST DATE: APPLICANT: FILl'?G DATE.- T__- _.�.J., , /IF'-/ roc PROJECrt G-a ..... .J o !�'2 'so at t ET .ria¢tJ TAT -u,p 13us it �✓b9 -'E PROJECT LAGATIONt �auy^,�}- r��'' I. i.NVIRO:.:IFRTAL X ACTS (Explanation of all , '? d "maybe" answers.. are required on attached sheets). 7 YES MAYBE NO 1. Soil Will the proposa3, ha va / significant �r� ant a. Unstable ground conditions-or in changes in geologic relationships? b. Die�Fuptions, displacements, compaction or butial. of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface w' contour intervals? ,1 d. The destruction, covering or modification Of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any potential increase in wind or water _ — erosion of soils, affecting eitbtr on or off site conditans? f- Charges in erosion siltation, or deposition? g. Exposure of people or property to geologic y hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, a similar hazards? h. An increase is the rate or extraction and /or use of any mineral resource? k l". droYo Will the proposal have significant results in: Page Z -. Y£5 \0 a. Changes i currents, or tine course of direction of flowin�streazs, ` rivers, or- zphemeral stream ch��iu;eis? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage . patterns, or the rate and .amount of surface wat - runoff? c, Alterations to the course or ,£low, of flo,id waters? d. Change in the amount of,;surface water in any body of water? Cy Discharge into surface waters, Or any alteration of surfac& watc,�J'qu,-lity? f. Alteration of groucd ±?ater characteristics? 1 g.. Change ir�the,quantity of groundwaters, y either through direct additions or with - drawals., or through Interference with an aquifer? Quality? ` Quantity? h. The reduction in the amount of Crater other- wise available for public water supplies? I- Exposure of people or ptoptrty to wager related hazards such as flooding or seiches? 3. Air Qualizv, Will the proposal have significant results In:" a.. Constant or periodic air emissiorks from mobile'' or indirect sources? Stationary sources? —� b. Deteriora*- on,of ambient air quality and /or Interference with the attainment Of applicable air quality standards? c. Alteration of local or''regional climatic conditions, affecting ail movement,, ZOisture or temperatur - - -'- , 4., Biota Flora. Will the proposal have significant results in: $- Change arc thy* characteristics of species. Init,lua:L,ng diversity, distribution, or number of any species of plants? h. Reduction of the numbers of any uni ue 0'r endan0reeF species � ,rare i y of plants? /7 , 7 t ' �r Page, 3 Qt, • c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of plants into YES 'L4YBE `0 T` an area? e. Reduction in the potential for agricultural production? Fauna. Will the proposal have significant resultit \� in: a. Charge in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or numbers Of ;My species of animals? b. Reduction of the numbers of any tinique, rare' or endangered species of animals:. / C. Zntrgdurtion of new or disruptive species, -af ?' animal ,=to an area, or result ,n a barriar ,r to the migration or movement of animals? �/ d. 'Deterioration or remava�'of existing fish or wildlife habitat? ! cJ - Y.. PoDulation.. Will �. L S the pzopo5a7;bave stgniEicaat results in: - �., Will the proposal alter the locatirn, distri- bution, density, diversity, or grq'oth rate of the human population of an area? IC b. Will the proposal affect•�kisting Housing, or ` create a demand for additional housing? b. socio- Eco� 5c Factors. Will tha proposal hatie " J significant- results in: a. Change in local or regional characteristics, including l ecotic;cic or commercial diversity, tax rate, and property values? b. Will project costs be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries:. i.e., buyer3, tax payers or project users? i'. Land Use and *elannine Consi derations. Will the;'• hav� proposal '_significant results, in ?_ 1 a6 A substantial alteration:af' the present or planned land use of an area? ' P b. A can£lick with any designations, objectives;_,, policies, adopted,'71ans J ' j of any government }.,, entities? - c. An impact "upon the qulaity or quantity of �r existing c`ortsLI pptive or nOV consumptive recreational apportunitjssi - y* - a Page L 8. wTransbVrtation. Will the pr results oposal have significant in• tLay3E '0 a. Generation of substantial, ad .. d3tiona3 vehicul.z , movement? � -'- b. Effects on ext? zting streets, or demand for 4%.' street co6struction? f- Jf e. Effe-'ss on existing parking faci2itts, or demand for nev partcing7 do Substantial Impact upon existing trFapo s " t rs- -tOn Systems? „\ Alterations to: present patterns of cxrculi -'. Lion or movement of people and/or gods? Alteza „a- h cr_.f�ects on present and potentia�� water- borne, rail, mass transit or air tral£f�c? g. Increases 11A traffic hazards to motor vehic7esi- bicycl: sts .-- ' .pedestrians? 8. Cultural Resaar�es. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. A disturbance to the Integrity of archaeological, paleontological, and /or historical resources? 31?. F_alth. safes:- and Nuisance Factors. Will the proposal have significant 'results in: f ICreation of any health hazSrd or potential health hazard? - EXguzsure Of people to potential health hazards? Q. A risk of explosion or relearn of,haxw,raoys tubstaaces in the �° event of an accident? :✓� d. An is ,tease in the -number 'Of individuals or 06, Ies of vector or pathentagenic organiws or the exposure of people to such organisms? a. Increase in existing noise. levels? f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous noise evels? $. The creat#ca of obj,1t unable, odors? h* An lacrease in light or Efars? - r, r 0 !l Page $ YES MAYBE NO 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have agnificanC res�,lts in: C� \ a. The obstruction or degradation of ;any scenic - ,vista or view? b. The creation'of'an aesthetically offensive site? C. A conflict with the objective of - designated or potential scenic corridors? 12. Utilities and Yublic Services. .Will the proposal hitve a significant need for. ew systems, alterations to the frgloVing: , a Electric power? b. Natural n cal o p €,4aged gas? c. Gommuhications systems? r d. Water ,supply? .- e. .Wastewater facilities? , Z. Flood control, structures? g. Solid waste facilities: - - vi h* rare protection? I. Police grotecti. ca,, J. Schools? e./ k. Parks or other recreational facilities? I. Maintenance of public facilities, including -, roads and ;load control >acilities ?/ M- Other governmental services ?: �� I3• Energy}• and Sca-ce Resources. Will the proposal nave significant,results in: c a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? y% b. Substantial increase in det;and upan existitp «- sources of energy? c. An increase in the ,demand fo \X ,,,development of new sources of energy?- d. r:e increase uz perpetuation of the - consumption of non - renewable forms -of energy, when. feasible' Yenewah��: _ sources of energy are available?' LIT Page 6 YES . MAm '40 e. - :Substantial depletion of any nonranewahle or ^` " AML scarce natural resource? ft lk. Mandatory Findings of Sig- if iclilce. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of,fish`or'wildiife species, cause a fish: or wildlife popula�4on to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal communiti',-rp4uze the number or restrict 'the range of a rare or endangered plan 'or animal or eliminate important exam �es of the majov pericds o� California 4ris ? r or prehigt�try? b. Does the �oject have the potential to achieve _ short r;�rm, to the disadvantage'of long -term, envi onmental gd;gls? (A short -term impact on the e- Aronment is one which occurs in a relatively' rsrief,'definitive period of time while Ion impacts will endure Well into the future) c. goes the project have impacoiy i&ch arg individually limited, but cumulatively" coarisiderafAe? (Cumulatively considerable mean,, that the incremental effects of 'an individual project are considerable when vie::ed in connection; with the effects of past projects,, and probable future projects) . L Does the project have environmental effects which wilj,tause substantial adverse effects. on human belsgs, either directllr or indirectly? i IIA DISCJSSION 0£_ EMkOtkE4TAL E'VALLTATION (i.e., of < firmative answers to the above questions plus a discussion of praposV -a _figation,measu es }'; �; 1. � -� G'/��?Ds1✓f' �4c.�i�'e>,=s' xv�s�r td co�/� ss�� ,n�rz.7o..rr m� �1�/57�4°ICS�aS.eaP G,: 2& .. ,�JC2�rgs� P.�eJ �N•`- ��u.•vr of t+s1�.�rzloacS S�LtQ�,�c�. woauGL1 + Eitl�2 T eQaiSlTior�AC S 2f Cs r"i!l�1G �F, oVGG AW Ts 0 7 32Afa5 y4USrec e3= u,t2B/L. ILi � • .. pRO�.E�T' a,Jpu.Lc1 ' � !17%G/2.�.+!-S,� GEri'.��1....5 0� �",S.^a'fT .$.r.� " 7� VIII. DETET.L`SF:tATIO1 ,. On the bads of this initial evaluation; l t T find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect F on the environzvhnt, =and a NEGATIVE DECL4RATION wi11 be prepared, i find that alcho�, the proposed project could have a significant effect on the enA**; ronment, there will not be a signiffcartt effect at this case because fibs mitigation measures described oz► an attached stave been added to the project. .A NEdl� IV-- DECLARt TION ti7 2TE p v I.find the proposed (tea ecL Fik�''7sa'rf a, ` j icant effect an` t gyT envir=ent, and an i:- .t'JIRO*i� tP A requited. I n Date W a7 Signature ti TIrle I i J e I i i t .• p t ITEM B CHT OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA C��o STOxF REPORT' F Z DATE: t�rs�h-27� 1985 tsrr TO: hairwwt and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City:Pianner . BY: 11H6ward f=ields, Assistant Planner = SU�iJECT: ENVIRONM=,YTAL ASSESMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DR 85 -02 - PEP 80 �- To allow the development of a retail automotive sa es s�e�rvice department of 21,828 square feet located on the nor;`;iwest corner of Hellman Avenue and Foothill Boulevard on appr5ximately 2.97 acres, within the General Comrm -, rciai District - APH 208- 632 -046, I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of site plan, elevaVons and issuance of Negative Declaration. B. Purpose: Construction of a 21,828 square foot automotive parts sales and service. i C. location: Northwest corner of Hellman Avenue and Foothill Baku evard. _ j D. Parcel size: 1.97 acres, E. Existing 7onina: General Commercial District F. Existing Land Use: Vacant ----- G. Surrounding Land Use and Zoninq: Low Residentiallbistrict. North - Single family homes; Low Residential District South - Apartments;, Medium Higff, Residential OV./trict East - Hotel, single family, mtb�\isle homes.;..'�'edium u Residential District ice; West,_.,- Shopping centers; General Commercial District; vacant. H. General Plan Designations: t Project Site - General Commercial North - Low Res.dential, 2 -4 du/ac ] South - Medium High Residential, 18 -24 du/ac 1 "a East - Medium Residential, 4 -18 du/ac West - General Commercial f j'` t ITEM B v PLANNING COMMISSION STAEE`REPORT Environmental Assessment and DR 85 -02 March 27, 1985 i` Page 2 , J jY I. Site Characteristics: The project/ site is situated on a vacant y_ i corner lot and slopes to the south at approximately 2% grade. The existing vegetation consists of scattered beshas and weeds. IL ANALYSIS: f A. General: The proposed project consists of an automotive supply �aiesfserrice building. All service activities will be conducted within the building, thereby effectively screening repair activities (similar to K;Mart auto .center). The site plan will accommodate the proposed use and provide a reciprocal - easement for future access to -ithe "westerly adjacent parcel. On -site circulation will faciIVite adequate traffic flow with tw6 driveway aproaches that will" service the site from,,foothiil and Heilman, respectively. !) S. Desi -,nn Review Conridttee• The Committee recommended revisions to the eIevatips includipg the utilization of river rock columns, color change from tan stucco to light gray with dark gray quarry, spate roof, trellis work;:integrated into the roof, and additim4l areas of landscap*K� round the building. The Commit aa7so recommended a spear landscape treatment at the corner, involving special landscaping and materials compatible with the building (river rock). and the use of kipw obstructiuj glass along the east elevation, C. Environmental Assessment., Part I of the Initial 5tudy'has been completed by theapplicant. Staff has completed Part II of the fnv.ronmental Checkli 1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Environmental Assessment.and DR F„5.02 March 27, 19 85 Page' 3` IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission issue a Negative Declaration and approve Deve`1 meat Review 85 -'ir2 by adoption of the attached Resolution ae.- Con4;r�ions of Approval. ' pect i submitted, �} lti 4 Ci y Planner RGnNF:ns „ ;> Attachments: Exhibit KAI' - Location & Site Utilixaticn Exhibit "B" - Detailed Site & Conceptual Grading Exhibit "G" - Miscellaneous Oeta It Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Landscape'P"1an Exhibit "�E" = Elevations Fart it- Initial Study. - `' Resolution of Approval with Condrfiio�ry` ` Y .i�,� �, .�.. . t y. � q `i`'X,� �� II it j r Y t • i�t �� : ` .� r r SUMMARY.- uwc Ago^/ SITE MAN - T.TAt- aUA MEh+2f b `� � )I awe. -• f>wwc. s.nir+Vw �a R^Ibtr�(i l�d�.flrJ ' LA�Ai T. RATIO 6LD6' - _..4.43 'A. f ,��. rr 9W B.tN�tlnl •. Pl+RMN6 R @4�J.... '�yT^yu.ATON 'f:h srrrswaelsx.aLrc + a) - pie. , . PM �LrV Wa t R6gt>. -- 80 PARKING r�Urost�lis)CAC+R r tiJi? �X`t • � ` F'dl� IOCVt gTY4tl �` x J1 AIVcC M CLUAMMA f 1 iul�'i= .��.0 k' PLANNM D r EXmffr: : g3yyE �~� wt+snweis�� SUMMARY.- uwc Ago^/ SITE MAN - T.TAt- aUA MEh+2f b `� � )I awe. -• f>wwc. s.nir+Vw �a R^Ibtr�(i l�d�.flrJ ' LA�Ai T. RATIO 6LD6' - _..4.43 'A. f ,��. rr 9W B.tN�tlnl •. Pl+RMN6 R @4�J.... '�yT^yu.ATON 'f:h srrrswaelsx.aLrc + a) - pie. , . PM �LrV Wa t R6gt>. -- 80 PARKING r�Urost�lis)CAC+R 1,J.0 Jk. VF .. Al t 0 L x J1 AIVcC M CLUAMMA f 1 iul�'i= .��.0 k' PLANNM D r EXmffr: : �i rtTra� erra, vwLL �� 1 s+ dt eY _ .^�f "'t:.ICfi Cd4� •` t71d ~f _._ •Mf.Y f•Jtl4r's Gv 'A'. 1::,ltOE�— h•i-•-1�^�'M4.. RS�7Hl�wi.w.4.i:. '��v` �+e w• `' YiviG. ov WN „p*y i tai 22�iit SNP' Nadi -= G.F#9AW.7: ina. �Krnr" F..1a+x ."`"'mss„` ---• -• a�u' ;� _ � .FS:� �--- `�" --,�- M ,k*lRY a/ i EGTIL7N To- 77 4 i a .YSrLV..iw. lazze Lr- LP . "" Lkz:ctY' iii'ari WKC% z'. r,x NX)RT CrrY CF P'LA'NM i) '1 ilw' -SCALE-.--.. i _' � 6 m'p'"+4"* �•mr�rl _""r°ivo +..f w.r. a4xx 41W�e*rrl 1 r .w ti dP�'r qf{8 n sf�+t1: elves � q_iacny wMSa �,,,, � Q(F[A w. ei wvrs twswy� - - � .. _ � � "'r' "_.'fir_. - t�-- -- '"• i^_�. � { £� { t WcaT = .•�jAL.�3 \` y, ��Ir/ VIR OFr, �* RA MW MONr TTiL = Pi�i�Ir1G �" EXF$FBtT =i4,0 CITY or Rs4�1060 CIICAK4�SGA FART IT - DaTIAL 5TLDy MIRON"MNTAL CHECMIST APPLICM-r. -� FILNG DATE: LOG ummm PROJECT: 2/ o 'PROJECT LOCA'TiON: .� �7 3x 4r srirtlrt� j I. RtYIROV_MTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all rges" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets) . Y$5 ZlAYEE NO 1. soils and Geolorv. gill the proposal have sign ificant_ results in.- a Unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or burial cjZ, the soil? .. Change in topography or ground surface contour intervals? - d. The destruction, covering or m041zf3catian of any unique geologic sr physical features? ..., e.. Any Potential increase in uin4 or wstrer erosion of sails, a €fectin:a :either on or off site condltons2 f. Changes in erosion sil.Latfon, or deposition? g. Exposure of people or property, to geologic hazards such as earthquakes,, lan4s4jTes, =11- slides, ground failure, o simt?at htisrds? ti- An increase in the rate of extraction andtor use of any mineral resource? 2w Eel of{Y dM . will the Proposal bava sign# €want � L 4 Page 2 YES u AY3E XG a• Changes in currzats, ,qx the course of direction, of flooring sreams, rivers, or channels? e0egeral streaa b• Charges in absorption rates. ' linage pattern or the ante and amount of Sur"ace water 11 runoff? / ' c• Alterations to thE,cours or flow Of flood' "( -- waters" d. Change in the amount of surface dater in: # body of water? -any e. Discharge into surface waters, or any ' alteration... of Surface water.Quaiitya ... . ,. : f. Alteration of groundwater;..Tharacteris tics? ' $. Change in the,quantity of groundwater$, either through direct - additions or with:., drawals, or throe gh T,tezirence with an aquifer? Quality? Qua t 4ty? �\ \✓/ h. The reduction in the 'nt of water other- Wise%available' , for public water supplies?' I- Exposure of i to water - related hazards rdsPsuch as such as flooding or sezci s? 3. Air Q_ Lrality, Will tht proposial have significa,,:rt res €+lts in- a+ Constant t periodic ai r emissions from mab_'-e or Indirect sources? { Stationary sources? b. neterioration of ambient air quality andfor interference with the I attainment of .applicable air quality standards? C. Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? ! 4. Biota f. Flora. Will the propQ;;al have significant results i. a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or number ar any species of Pl,Ints? -1 # b• .Reduetiou'of the nu� era of any a }ique, rare at` endangered species',. of C plants? w " G ?age 3 MS `iaYBr yo c. Introduction of new or- disruptive species of plants into an area? d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural production? Fauna. Will the propasal'h;tve significant results in7- a. "- Change in the characteristics of species,' including diversity, distribution, or numbers of any species of-animals,3 b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare , /{ or endangered species of animals? Y c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of animals into an area, or result lm:,a barrier to the migration or ;moyameii:� of tjnimals? d. Deterioration'_ oz remrval c: existing fish or 'r wildlife habitat? 5. Population. Will the proposal have significant results in: { a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, dinrny, diversity, or rate of - .growth the human population of an area? b. Will 'the proposal affect existing housing, or create a, demand fur.additionai housing? 6. Socio- economic Factors!. Will the proposal have significant results a. Change in local or regional. Socio- economic characteristics, including �: -__ -- economic or commercial diversity, tax rate, and property values? b. Will project costs be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax payers or project users ?L / 7. Land Use and Plannine Cot.-_iderztions. Will th'e = proposal have significant results u� in? a. A substantial altez!.tion of the present or ' planned land use of an area? ' i b. A conflict with any designatiares, objectives, Polities, or adopted plans -,of any goverrn;;ental _ entities? a. An impact uponrlthe,qulaity or quantity of existing cons=pLive or non - consumptive recreational11opportunitiesi Page G YES "!Ayn ,. Tr3nsnortation. Will the proposal have significant. i. _. � results ins:, a. Generation Of substantial t� additional - moveent? Vehicular b. EffFCts on existing streets, or demand for / -ii sweet construction? c. Effects oz existing parking facilities, qr demand for new parking? d. 'Substantial impact upon existin�_ tion systems ? g transporta ` c- e• Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or movement Of,peop3e and/or goods? , Alterations to or effects on present and r %� Potential water- borne, rail, mas, transit hr R,! traffic? g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehi ^.les, bicyclists or�pedestriana? 9. Cultural Resources; W311 the proposal have significant results in: a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, paleontological, an&/or historical reseur,es? _ 10. Health. Safetv, and \•uisancd'Factors, _.Will :he i proposal have significant results inc a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health ealth b. Exposure'of people to potential health bazards? c. A risk af. explosion -or release of hazardous LL substances in the event of an accident? d. An increase in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such j organisms? e. Increase in etc ±sting noise levels? ff f. Exposure of people to poterrially dangerous -/ noise .levels? > 8• The creations __�abjectionable odor! ?* k. t. An increase in llgY-t or glare? ..� j z l Page�� 'I 11. Aesthetics. is_ etics, ]1'the proposal have significant 'YES k BE NQ results ults ia; a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic vista or view? f �S.— b* The creation of an Aesthetically offensive f mite? ✓ c. A conflict with the objective of designated or, potu►rial scenic corridors? Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal have _ a significant need for new systgms,i er alterations to the fallouingt` a. Electric power? b. Natural or packaged $ast c. Communications systems? d. Water supply? - -- e. Wastewater facilities? f. F� :Cod cerntrol structures? �� 7\r g. Solid waste facilities? h. Bire protection? l G 31 Police protection? , j. Schools ?. - k. Parks or Other recreational facilities: 1. Maintenance of public fatalities, including roads and flood control facilities? M- Othez governmental services? _ Y 13. Enerer and Scarce Resnurces. Will the proposa,1 have significant results jr.-. a. Use o£'substantial or eecessive 16uel or energy? ? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources _ of energy? c, An increase In the'demand for development of rew sources Of energy? d. An increase or perpetuation of the aonsumption r,.. . of non °renewable forms -of energy, when feasible ' renewable sources of energy are.available? ` 1 `��— r r t Page s e* Substantial depletion 4.__4 nonrenewable YES 'scarce natural resource? or . 14. Mandatory� gindisf Sips_- a. flies the proect have the potential tar.Eagrade the quality of the „envi onizent:, lstantially %r s reduce the habitat of fish ar wife r r cR*z4e a fish or wildl p ti, species, L ifa c slailah to drop self' sustaining levels, / t'e�w hfi?a threaten to a plant it animal ,community, 'reduce number the number or; restrict the rangO of a rare or endangered plant or nd:tganp animal or eiminare examples of the major periods o£ California history or prehistory?, b. hoes the project have t. e h potential to achieve short -term, ..~ U -- to the disadvantage of long -.re r environmental goals? Wshort -term impect on the environvent is One which occurs in'a relatively berm£, definitive � period of time while ]long- term impawts will endure well into tha. kuture). I I e. Does the pxajeet have..iaspects which are individually, 'limited, but cumulatively.' 1 considerable? (Cumulatively CO6 iderable means that the incremental effects of an Ind ividual project are considerable when viewed f iT'.nnnettion with the effects.,of past projects, acid Probable future projects). / d. Does the project have environmental effects which will c4use scbstantial adverse �-.ffects an human beings, either directly or indirectly? II. IIISCU5SIT' QF NLt'IA6'LKvgTr+i VALtTealaN the abava ques�ians plus a discussion of proposed t�itiggatlonQmeasures). 7 ac. r 1 r a r: Page 3 YII. D£TERMINNATION r> Gn the basis of this initial evaluation: - I.find the proposed P d project GOUT�7 SOT have a significant effect r and on the environment, and a riE"TI7E DECLA%4TIOX, Vill be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on tha environment, there will not be in this case because the 17 a significant effect measures described o an attaghed sheet have been ad to the project. IA, NEGATIVE: DEGj kPATIO;I WZLL BE PPAP' I find'the pr used project 491f have a significant effect on the:' envirnment, an air EWIRONMENx IMPACT ='^.PORT is required. Date n •7�" S�.,gnattite Title ,i �l fj y Z_ R RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPML*N REVIEW NO. 85 -02 LOCATED AT NORTHWEST CORNER OF F'�0OTHILL BOULEVARD AND HEfS`4MAN_AVENUE E GENERAL COMMERCIl DISTRICT /f WHEREAS, on the 30th day of �'`Ar ary, 1885, a complete:- application was filed * Pep Boys for�review of the above -descr bed,project; and WHEREAS, on- the 27th day of March,' 1985, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above - described project. NOIi, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning 6mmission resolved as follows: SECTION l.: That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed project ',is consistent with. the - objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and 3._ That the proposed use is in compliance with each a the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applrlcab -le thereto, ,";wi11 not be detrimental `'to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially 1 njurious to properties or improvements in' the vicinity. SECTION 2 - That this project will not c. —eate adverse impacts-om-the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued` on March 27, 1985, SECTION 3 That Development Review Nol(85 -02 is approved subject to the following conditions and attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION: ,i 1. Provide landscaping including trees to the south elevation. 2. Utilize dark grey slate for roofing material, and light grey stucco color. 3,: Provide open trellis work to breakup the roof. 4. Provide special landscaping statement at the corner of Foothill and Heilman, -/e h Svl Resolution No. Page- 2' > ENGINEMING U1VIS10ti: i. I. A permlvt from Caitrans is required for any work within Foothill Boulevard rjght -of -wad prior fin ,issuance of s r ., buj'�ding permits: 2. H��,ilma^s Avenue driveway approdth r shall bi�� designed to 1 p, eclude i~lvod lwaters from enterirxg the site; 3. DeveToper' shall- provide reciprocal access to foothill Boulevard for, the ad3acdnt property to the !pest. 4. The driveway approach on foothill Boulevard shall be moved westerly . to be more convenient as a mutual access point. The 'preferred location is centered on the interior north/south drive aisle. A less desirable location could be centered on the westerly property line. APPROVED AND ADGPTED THIS 27th DW OF MARCH, 1985, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE.CITY 05 RANCHO CUCAMONGA Dennis L. Stout, Ghairinan ~` r. Rick Gomez, Deputy ecretery I, Rack Gomez, Deputy Secretary o€ the Planning Commission oi the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the �oregainq itesolutjon was duly and regularly in roduced passed, and adapteei Y the Planning Cd msissioh of,- -the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regularPing of the Planning Gommision held, on the 27th day of Nareh, "B&j by the _F6llowing vote-to-wit- AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: �\ i ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: .t a U O 41 O Y 9 A n zt, LD �a M CY LO.diaY 00' ' =O Ob bY. �G yOyrC WE N ° <uTa J'� L w.a Cip gA K: vE Y 4t3 ~'Y G.=X ^ON. o. Lab q.0 p.0 ypyav a =N oluz; q. ^ L «6LOU4. t6 mhi bt. T COQ CY. W Cy- CyYj.Y „. aM�2 .+o4 °oIYU 42 aa'p N.0 - —. OORULpLC A� s�M L AFL- gYgj�YC Q C C N „d„ eb C ^'a A C L A N 3 C C k^ 111° Iv ..P. 5 t - a�..U..CU� ~:dN V9, PZ L^ o... od'� as �� n a a`��.N ..-T oL quo. Nt L ado ��.�•^a ro��aW. Vr O.�A VC.-A y.0 t �v0 yCC t100 b tl u e C O ^T y C=AV Klnw� yyE 4y b6. Ya. M 41V �. @@ G +' V G C W E W U U. ; O a. � d • a' c m _ I R= CL W G b -Nd 4 a1 C O Y.9 O.O`d - -- -- L yOy.� a6WL .rS C ttY Y. SdStt Oyy CTS` Q1 yC+.4 0.TY R9SNLAZ`Cn O !-CpON "G InYMt 609m �i�p,V Rti Kq pii y ASIL G F t � J ba0 � ab ti OVy� L •t u ¢ O �. UYC al a «.� Y E dyf u.yu V upp C« 6 q s 4 0. Y p:.yl F u h i � - �!�!f <CT C .0 Y l�A f% j•6NNML �� _O �^ to u�c �� a.a Yb y . ^II d ?: Y � C +"EL_L v � y L II d ,i Yoa.E orb C �z .0 -Par s yR� °owIOYSq Y- ^O. o oy yM 2 _ pr NO�VZG =4 �_ �_ Ca tj Oe ^b L }L.O�Lp n G 2 u Ya w d ° V N Ow RNUV •w =:p a h P MO 6 N ` q�Y� ON' L Y 3 Y Y. } CAiw U y` ♦n uN4W 4r �ip i(d p-5 d C4O Oj co. S Y40y�. 9�bY vL Y uNe LgYq ,II ^ca s`e= 4 -`.^ N :m4 g.' °«.N 1 y YEYa coda Mi. cayy�.' g u -. w a�NA° uu +. Nis O1cYgx .+ '";-0 Yeas yer. -E �c a"+a.N eyEsa'r �°.uo O1 uo� q 'cao �:4 �c=4 N_L YY ^_�aa.N L y-p 4q� 6 ^pN CnYV�V1��Nt°�ti xb _ 72Ndu N CO „n bC 4 �w 3Y -fi �.C�wVQ� W.� �d GNYar +6 G^Z [SC t''�6Ci ACM Ur O 4NY. �' rI • ° pE d4: A60'F _52 ",.. r °3NU Q OY STYLN awcv..N. oz4'ya riVC Z'A�.ucc ^�9 C6 C �3N4 OOC�O- VO_U�a1 qKw COI' d O L =i 4 4 Ot y V OT6 ay „ V N } w pY r'a'^"Y tj6 wW S. �N 6CaY tlhaMy” N. Z n^ � b. � a r. y c ,,., � � i �r A r cw } �•.. � y a°' o. � o =.w� YS 'I'Sa yYq 1 RY� yyvrL�p 4rn ihC ja-. f c ' Y 2 �^ O_ 7 S /lO9N �S C'1�„4 s' i:-.- N wOCH ♦L3 a' W4 O 3 6 'O��Nw c^ a0 }L _C go v Q� v d6 O 42gyG 1F V aorw =9 B? d LO �'>O YOC w y _ ua CY pGq A.t wui�a O.p yyOar i+lu iTLd ac �N OCI ^W L4 Y�� UwU LpC a�w4a y6gw k{ cE O�CdN cL 4poy6.y i2p'=^ YV iONV = a �Q, 0� C.�CG �AYW q22 p�p�t 04 yna SJ 3y CV' i40 =Y�� VbNn ♦i •aN9- +. d�V mA Pa61GC cy pp ?IL �n q�a Viw CIItcB �'=..LY d4p OTa cp'^'�04 IY..Cyq uVu V L° i C b Nrcy A E NO L. ^. L LYTS Ke,N,a .d �i': _ T= V ~' 61L C O AIL a ^L Y. �t3 CY Y 6aYN Oi4ggh> UL E {)_M ^br ^..■.. S >dN H4- w L ap vC EC.p p. i r Z 41 ci Q1 �Q CL- N Na{it °aQ'da S bYN�Q d - �QG= v N W Tt�i C� 9wVi II� V L G L t UNN Gj ` a M a V �@.. Ate° O GQ N A b t;k Sz, N jbp1 a -,V"3 yg01 O b-. p L ^{..Yµ C rby^ „y.C.� L ^� d �a ks O = ap 2N Vim.. ..G. y °q G � ^e uwA+T ��S 4 �• d�.^ -, rAy T w }. � �6NL I L 'p �C 't'p6 y;W co wa�Pl4Q TMp _a YYW a '. PaT 49.. v Vw 4..16 ow NG°c c+'9cp+'a4^ � @C EA AO.O �i^.�� GyCt I.uwia L L ZRp yd�K q`'a �� VW. YY iI NA` t--;: .GAG oM� .-:;2 O yy o G m 6 Ktl OLXp-aa N C. L NL ^4O �C�ee `Ya..1G Md p. Vu p d ICY K�q L d6Y �/ ` Off04 NGNr �>LLDC 8 1-3 A dN'� G1 K O. a5Y. l C oCLgO m ✓NpO �y A@ ~~11�CC1`L 0�9�� d Mi3� ~N=OR 4 G'aW�4 C ^N N~ VY yGy `=O YpO L� ��CG.. >. 6OSt AY N..4.00i q!$ -i C Fy ` ° Ea.' o g o G C Z N N A Ny Y 'y 2 G a r '&Z A $ C 61 OR d n @ C r , a y G n 6u1 "SN�1 %?yVy 4 A06 4 °u Oda LL.Oq� 9 C �NaV U -N aC ...y V \..• A. 33... 01 +C 1L�� I+ ,CN `OVq wC CG N 3 a � co d 01 NY 00 d C ^G wd� L d N ° L YY r^ Q C d cCt O GO G -0Y ^ Y 4 a w Y t CNE G° ^irrl@ °v`.. + 4} L Gp W GO Y �Py _ .. 6 Ktl OLXp-aa N A ^ A9 L La } N.@ L .C°C C.yA, G A @ N yG L�nC a5Y. y p A sa'''= u ~� C ^N N~ VY yE a O A 4 YpO L� ��CG.. >. 6OSt AY N..4.00i q!$ -i C Fy ` ° Ea.' �nP 73— W T� M. CN%.: N N A Ny Y GGGS u w CL� 666 a °jam: Y N q Ga L U r d 61 OR W rZAi LL..t@a G G p Y pq@'y Lc.� Ot. ag 1,5- OI. @O .. EL �.0 r K@ Q LU '4<y". um ^J Z i �G @" y uM 4d� @ o� p. ° °f'p° *99"S y.; F39.�o r3 TA... . p .—S d p uoN as G2 S 4° �bG O Ad l'. Y L pa L .2 A i L Q% C� Y AR T.Ow �C6t� Kl ^O @ L nL T yA Ap �o cocL a° a a N �Y cy .L uv °s L v off° iL.+�'i x cLC a.K °y-f Y �i a.CV °yC C N'� Cyw z OY Y` G }}r�'vpw@ YN Wb�Ri• WV�.a ..N ^ r Gn-�y aG yM l @ia +W4 y.� G >• yy 4aN 4V s@@ a 5 a YOY 'Y Wr.L @ ^OL N n1 Y L LO %'uw �. @ 4K nA W@M0;6S1' Hw N.yN M . C ^L �W da NNW y�.� ff 6Nf.. 3N0 FN..0 _ w "4 3 ►a O Z 4J O N •O S. C6 ,.q v:d Y� �rsua cc �Oa oc ww C uRa Y rn n �4•.a.AU �Ti�Nx ..emu. ,.L°`� �� M 9Y',.4c. zy. :5 .4.9 u� c9.0 4 wc,4,o 044 ci i4 .ov w.... L o 24 t 4'L2 LY'Ca.+ -... a EA „o, vG _o �uvi TeM LSO 4qd 3Yr'Gir Rh V�4 44� EC ^O A4_ S"p bL�.0 2C 4.1 T d 11 :52 z;- a Cd c � nU y .4C a 4 Y0 d Cf. r �L�J6 yy W wN �r NB. VC'OS`O yT NO OM �.- _� tldpVC Baia 1 � +._ ^i1 cy, OT'e190 4�paJ H ^'~ «� A �oN9 a•C. , F tM 4Y ��pp GC p.; m w` EQ yN 9N12 C YC L O W S aq g. G ... N J 6�V ^� LyrL wNt.'.. �H�,fi• K L IIVC CLN T'O a Tr ^w 't wOVO� O� Ot OS q.4ynA ^ C Cp NQtl V y 9.wy Ny LL GK yy {`. Cq4 en ^ 'N�E V d N FUWt �3 ft.. V1 i IrO N d NQ KVV E6 SE Iii :z N y^ ,rQ COQ L« W G ^c�cN N pTyt y a N v�nuEE Op0 LG FQw. L wn i t,2 �..�� tL G n=i cd Lp T'.oe° Z. O G G 6 d o tl J: Y L V 6 a • C S W O L gN p i 4 a TJ sin o g L b Tt e CC G SE2 .22 w Lam:. Y � Mr }N20 V dr � MGtm 4 u. JLJ sv uo i= ZE Lu`o° Q °a n`A••Caw _ < C _ emG {p. u< %tl ii Cu LIO ■ L Y �p L Y KtlrwL.- N ^p li. IW �i 64ZY {FF 1 {f �J � •yi7 +i ;� . l/ /1 r- e L. Y.b1 .... . -..-.. N. CppSN WY^ t ,Y� t •Q Q^ Lsw Y Cq ess' Oa- 3 y eq <�YP 6vV.d 40 CvC.. j.0 MCa y H.H Yam q Nil.. • Y1'tY.4S Cgw t O qe� a Y Kq N G � Yw a yg .tc0 ^4� ]ai u.Yi »Mp C14 1 LH tJa. eC,`4 RCQ6Y> gy�pp'it LC O4oNY -cC� N to Y1 W h C0 Q1 G M .•1 N ' Ln M- i Lam ' gi. •°•. f" vx.N.• TIZZ" Sv ° Kv <�Luw ■ � M E YO. Y. „ orY4 Y9Wp 10 ap $^ Cg w. L Shy P. NL. � d�Y �� ♦.L�q «� �� - n OF7 e.r �a YO H L GNWCH,Y y4+�' eGCi. aw w e.N„. 2F� i �s A r oPL.G.. NLd� �'�GD4 �C1 V.fla.Lab� VY t.Q N� N ar `.. A. w�� '�-�C� µi. urry. �.� e•� -p .Y COa nay 4 a,e Ow ot� 1 dq^'O=T Pw3. ^l..CUN NALN yPy ^d cC �� .O aa'e nU:Na a M d' 4r M. tPar•y YMyL 4w'a'n3 G4CC {A{..N KaL. ^'C y.4 L ala ^ NY C-a6 � ¢ y a V.G Gyy PO 4 d tlL� �d� w n^ V.N y^,�Q P i.W Y�.G Gb40. dtl GdC in1C�N ��^ #aZ YMrW.N 66y RN?.NC C^w E'E GW LM 'C. wrV � M= Iif Vlu4Ylw .G q. iSQ CA:�ff�4�. WID�'4.} '!S OPPifN�n�R � i...~1A C 'o �i e I O Z 41 U a d tl tl i i Y Y tl �Y� O M Gy Q+��O •. .�� GNP �M ; 4 LPL ' R qM� GC N O •. • �Ly ... Q n i ° °Cd O N N MGY U .mss: Gi NLy L S� N d L Y q Y tl .y I�. y V V a Y °jp0 yy �g4CeN CN tltl W CirV yc tlL E. 9M'O L °G N. tl Z�� tlppn NE L =Y A ErV CC ` T E-Z Yy G HV Vy Oatli�C Nq d O ev4 p�po0 i Hy NW yy^ pY tltl� Tr iM � O.d N., LG - `yQQ tl 07 tl N L i 39: OT V. YC V. {{ GoG q G v Li C x.14 Wk Ml V.r 6etlry tY La' iti q'6 {.tV 1�9 I I�b r'$ �6N KN J� Q M ti Y tl� l iRF,I g O E C yQ O v iy Ur W D CS� w r IM <O Wy I C� i7J L TQ � 6 p O4 B GJ N3 o r q o 4a O � � w G -L w ^ z w s 0 i L N �7 r y. � .^ � tlq.M •� �ws °`nom i 4 CL tl� E q L w q L O H.y.O tl L ` Cer er ti. d G O �p _cu G q 1gg� w �Gy� y tl6L Q! 4 Oe NO��i v Na QR yC� � atl 6� y V .may �..�..v- y. � .^ � tlq.M •� �ws °`nom i 4 CL tl� E q L w q 3PM Y Y V L+ L .G C 6y 6 nL C.T d c n G O �p �N 1gg� w �Gy� e Sv tiL� v qY�G„ V y � C pv IL qy V O. 1-2 moo' H tl�0! R"9iyG � q V G Nr`� E4 ^W Y6�tlq ^ G 'E Vy Y> Lr- N . Qy vFt .- r�� , �µ QAb. OFa..v C YY iX, �• adQ.s^' I! L yCi 4� L n..a4 i= tl C O"a F> • Y . .L•aF:. <5 d3 ��H.: < °...a � ta.G c o . . A k, C V j, a p 12 w t l - e o.�"+ e e. F F°.X s �:. Y a. =U t. • •� a a ~ > . Eg N •� Q1WV Y Y C C YC V Q Cy . 4 =�•` V O O O y y � uaL 4 4 F r Q na LC '°M n OLy � � ` `.` Y "`o. ' a'c �•� a J • a � �� IV- •L . Vr o oY c cy ate.0 27 � CC b d� �� aq t t iCq 4 4 V V 7 7 - L L9 a .0 � ~QY a . �.' � �� 9 9ffk ~ r# CIT OY } NOW CUCAMONGA DAE. March March 27, 5985 I877 TO: Chairman 'and Membe �O of the Planning Commission FROM; Rick Gomez, City, 111anner Darr Colemar '"'Senior Planner ' SUBJECT, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSPUT ANR CONDITIONAL USE FERMi ,,84-3_ a'#iIYERSIF D PR P R �- The stave opment of an Yntegrate shop,ing canter, of approximately 2�8,98a square j feet which includes a gaspline service station, as proposed Phase I' and a, pr0p6sed master plan for future , phases. All o.; aporoximately 25 acres of land in�tFe Neil!hborhood Commercial ',�stritt generally located Afr the northeast corner of V ghr�Id Alf --nue and;. Haven Avenue - APN' i 20I -271-53, BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission, at its meeting of February 27, 985` , coat ;sued this item to hold a special adjourned m ,-,ting u th the app=s want to dii truss design issues. This rxarkshop has been sdieduled j for March 2-5 1985 at 7.00 pm. at which tree the applicant wil'i present � a series ' ,jf revised sketches, for discussion based upon the Planning- 1 Commission's input and direction, The ap4tficarxt has ccnsented:to „an additional 'two week co4tinuance to the April ZO, I9P3 agenda to allbw adequate time to finalize revisions to the project design. RECOMMENDATION.* It is recommended that this itel!,be continued t6 the ARr a agenda. Re Gifu sub fitted, 3 _J j Inr /� p�T 7ck omen qty r G: V, T rirJ 0 ITEM C. v G TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r�,y�a STAFF REPORT' � +' n7 Z > DATE: Mt «rch 27, 1985 TO Chairman and tubers of ;tbe Planning Lv�mission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Flanner (' BY: Ban Coleman Senior�Planner SUBJECT, ENWIRONMENTAL. ssSMENT AND GENERAL. PLAN AMENDMENT 85-01- E B - XkC 4lEVELO M "rte- .A genes ai Plan Amendment from Medim Resid vial 74 du /ac} to High Residential (24- 30 - dulac) far: a senior citizen apartment proaject oa 4475 acres of lit located on the west side of Amet %yst, .north of 19th Street. - „AF N 261- 232 -24. ENVIRONMENTAL. ASSESSMENT ' AND DEVEbOPM NT DISTRICT NDR INT - - TAC DEVELOPM Efii' - A Development District Amendment from Liedium -, Residential (4 -14 .4a/ac) ito high Residential (24 -30 du(ac) and Senior ' fi +tszn ' Overlay District fur a senior citizen apar merit` prajeet on 4.75 acres of land located on the west side of Anethystj north of 19th Street - 4N 201- 232 -24. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANDS:DEVELOPKKT REVIEW 85 -01 TAG +1EYEkDNMW. -- The. 4eve opment of a seniors citizen housing project totaling Ifi8 apartment units on 4.75 acre's- of land in- the Medium Residential Districf'(proposed Wgh Residential /Senior Housing Overlay DistiftLY to be located;, on the west side of Amethyst, north of 39th Sti'eti '' - APFL ,201- 232 -24. Y 1, PROJECT AND SITE 08SCRIPTION: f3 A. Acticn RIguestedt Approval of G,oieral Plan Amendment, Mve`lopment District Amendment, site plan, elevations,,. and issuance of a Negative -- Declaration. B. Purpose: Development of 16a'3eniur citizen apartments. C. Location: Vest side of Amwthyst, north of 24th Street (Exhibit uA A 'Parcel Site: 4.75 acres. L �,, Erristinq�7trninn: Medm Residential. Lsxistino Land Ilse: Citrus or°cLaar^d. x ITEMS Di: E & F 3. a.'�"...__,.. 3 �m" 9MMM, ,T . arch ZT, IM Paste 2 ° 1 G. Project Density ". H. Surrounding Land Use and Zonis morn -1 - vx—i,, r {iproposed freeway); Low Residential. Swth - Retirement Vie, MrserY, single-family reside etss Medium Residential. East - fire station, post office; ffediUM High Residectid�,f. West a Co inims; Nedium Residential. I.. General Plan Designations; c Project Site _ fledium Residential. Florth - Lox Residential. SCo�u�,t,�,h -Low Residential. Last 4 1 Livic ji ity. Vest - hediam Residential. J. Site Characteristics: The site slopes moderately to the south at aM- jxW; -e- y - -, grade. Existing-'vegeta'tion consists of Etrzalrrotus windrows along the north property line aid Amethyst frontage. Aban&med citrus graft covers the remainder of this „ site. 11. ANALYSIS: ` JL &enaral: the proposed senior citizen apartment coWlex col:sists of I68 one ae'two bedroom units in a total of four 1 buildings. Each building contains =elevators, laundry r facilities and a lobby. The buildings, have been arranged on the site to create a `aatrat open spare area with conplete it recreation facilities and to buffer the open space from facture freeway wise. Access to the graject still be provided from Amethyst Avenue s - tivas southerly prosy line, with emergency secondary access provided ,ear that itvrtlerly property line. Paring has been provided at a ratio of one space unit. C S. feral P'aa Amendment and Des+elfflMM9 District _ The applicant is requesting a beneral Plan AMMOMMM am Zoone Chas►ge from Medium Residential to High Residential with a Senior Citizen Housing 'Overlay District. Pursuant to the Senior" sousing overlay District guidelines, the City Council reviewed the appropriateness of this site for se4lor apartamts in terms of Tocatiauaal criteria relative to services for senior citUrens. The attached EAibIt -C" indicates warby shopping, medical, and other services. Tfie City Co il, at its rreeting r> of October li IW4, 'Indicated that the s*ject property would be appropriate for Senior Housing Overlay'District t staves provided ;-applicaint sashed a sf the van spice for the residents. tl.� I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT `GPA 85- 01 -B /DDA 85 -01 /DR 85 -01 TAC Development n -March 27, 1985 ;i Page 3 The current Medium Residential (8 -14 du/ac) designation on the site would allow development ofz up to 66 units. The 168 apartment units proposed by TAClbevelapment will increase the permitted density by two -fold to High Density Residential and includes approximately a 20% density bonus as provided for by State Law and the "City's Senior Housing Overlay District guidelines. The increase in density -N the primary incentive offerred b;5 the City to facilitate construction of affordable. senior citizen rental units. rl C. Design Review Committee: The project has been designed to meet',` the needs of senior citizens as established by the Senior Housing. Overlay District including, passive /act4e recreation facilities, buffering from noise sources, and accessibility. The Design Review. Committee focused upon providing adequate' amenities'j= the senior citizens. The Committee was concerned f; that the orvginal recreation building size was inadequate to ;.,- _ provide su €ficient meeting and hobby roomv� The applicant has responded by expanding the recreation bu'il:ing to provide a total of 2,372 square feet, including a large multi- purpt)se _ room with complete kitchen facilities, and two sepay'4te activity rooms. The Committee also recommended that sh�de structures, barbeques, ben es and similar _amenities he it provided for the use and loyment of the residents in tl�e , common :open space area. T21e facilities are indicated oa t", { revised site plan, Exhibit "D" and will be conditioned.' Ir\ addition, the Der0gn Review Committee recommended that dipse landscaping be provided around the project perimeter to buffer the senior apartments from freeway noise and to buffer, I he aojaeent_ residential developments to the west and south f om the three ah apartment buildings. Special landsca�fing treatment should also be provided between Amethyst and Building No, 1, including the proposed retention basin. D. Gradina Committee: This site is located adjacent to Amethyst venue ,, is 3s su ject to seasonal flooding. To mitigate this caY�ccrn. the project has been designed with a detention basin adjacent to Amethyst Avenue to limit pea% flows from the site to the predevelopment flow rate, see Exhibit 11H11. Engineering Division has reviewed the hydrologic calculations for the basin and determined that it is adequate in size and design to mitigate this concern. Therefore,. the Grading Committee haf granted conditional approval of the conceptual gradiAg�)pian k subject to review and approval-,,of the final grading plan. ii d E. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has U E completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part ;fi of the Envircnttal Checkltst and ha4 determined that ,although the proi`ect., could have significant) impacts in terms of flooding, Mtsity increases, and noise exposure, these impacts have been r effectively mitigated through the project design and conditions of approval. "therefore, Staff recommends issuance of a 4 ;, k�l PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 85- 01 -8 /DDA 85 -01/DR 85 -01 - TAC Development , -March 27, 1985 .; Page 4 Negative Declaration based upon the mitigation measures as described in the attachment to the Initial Study, Part 11. (Amendment, III. FACTS FOR, FINDINGS: ?he proposed General Plan the Development District Amendment and prarject design As consistent with the General Plan, Development Coo; and Senior Citizen Housing Overlay District requirements. i,4rther, the construction of affordable Senior Citizen Housing promotes the 'goals of the City's ' Housing Element and Senior Housing Overlay District. The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties .or cause significant adverse environmental impacts because .of mitigation measures . included 'in the project design or, required as Conditions of Approval. `)In addition, the proposed use, building design a 1, site plan, together with the recommended Conditions of Approval are in, compliance with the applicable provisions of the Development Code. , IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The- 65 Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices r mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. Further, this project was reviewed by a subcommittee of the V.I.P. Senior Citizens Group. The subcommittee supports approval of this project at this location and offerred specific recacnner+dations for amenities and features within the apartment units which are reflected in the Conditions of Approval. V. RECOMMENDATION: If the Planning Commission can support the Facts for Findings as listed in the - attached Resolutions, then approval` of the General Plan`Amendment, 'D'evelopment District Amendment, and Development Review and issuance of 4 Negative Declaration would be appropri Re a submitted, P le Gomez _ ` it Plan er RG:DC:ns Attachments: Exhibit ' "A" - Location Map Exhi& ';!B" - Site Utilization &hint "C" Service - Map Exh76it "D" - Site Plan Exh bit -Ell _Elevations Exhibit 'IF" , Floorplans Exhibit "G" - Recreati -A Building Exhibit "H" Grading Tan Exhibit "I" - Initial Study, Part Ii Resolutions: GPA 85 -01 -8 :., DDA 85 -01 ff OR 855-01 a RADIUS 1s AIP LM E .. j �-. t • t� dP MH dp Nd �i�`�' R OF os ° . LM NC • NORTEK CITY G ITEN I RANCRO CI..;C NIONI GA TIME. PLAID NIING i?I'viSlcX XHIEIT= ., _ a � t - i Y Yr, CANTr rRO10rt0 - ♦RLLW.fY �+ 0 err f �s r wca t E ! i n•rvcr .+ /,f /f f� // / rrnr..ia �e • .(rlXd'J. GfI.P.. 2 ii . �r.+rt Y OF swu ,sar _ �� 0 !/Nair FwtCY:.. RLt4rLVESd- DEVELOPMENT. DISTRICT MAP: ' .... LM. . .k. rJ,si r.�tf... 'f ♦ 1 LM E .. j �-. t • t� dP MH dp Nd �i�`�' R OF os ° . LM NC • NORTEK CITY G ITEN I RANCRO CI..;C NIONI GA TIME. PLAID NIING i?I'viSlcX XHIEIT= ., _ a V.4 CAA17' PROP455 E4151 d-R F E kA BfJCJE G 7' 'ifrfJPER 7'f' rMJ r`J ��fi tr,2rs� �Rav� fnf�vJ �Lf�i �JxUtTf =FAMJL }' EX 15. /niG yINGG f R.ESrDt�rrAt � ,t! 5-4TYtJ1✓ Rasa 3. `1 3J,4N"4 E FAQ. Ji(UQ Ee HOME R -3 Q�5'�OcNGS q 5lrJ t AMt Y 5ING2l Al AXI&ON ES \ ' xc'E.41- E5TArZ' . � �, StNGG E FAhsf� Y �sfn,�ntr /at aTy OF ITEM -- p�.�M DID FxHIsrr � ��_ �- - r 19 I _ zo �—S n1 SI7E i� GNi G: rY6y� k Ell, {2? -i ` Baseline �ti ! , jD14 - `L LI 11 -OT TO SCALE 1} 19th & Archibald - k mile 19)) 19th & Beryl -^ # mile 1'. 3 }: 5 4) Baseline& Archibald - 1 mile 20} Baseline & Amethyst - 31 -,ite _ 5 Foothill E Archibald - 2 miles \, 6 5 7} Foothill - 2h miles ti 8 Faothili • 2.6 miles 9 Foothill - 2� miles , In j- 11 }, 3 14} . Baseline & Carnelian - 1 3/4 miles � 12 Baseline • 7$ miles NORTH 13 Baseline - l4 miles i5 E 18} 19th A.CArpelian - i mile i CITY OF i ITEM. 7 RAN CUCAMOl�GA G TI` LE: PLAMING DIViSM EXHIBIT :.SCALE LN3WYdO -J3A3G 3VJ. E)NlsnoH Holm S yeti rZy� 6e., �`•oa.�v.L • -� 3flN3A:� _1�1,N13Y:Y v � � '� .� 4 x �y o yy�401D} 1V;S�OAOC W 2'et 4 fC C,l fs aogo t '. •.f 6' ,• fF (� S t aj L a m- M. > { `1 .1111 W77��iY11f�� {{4R�S � iH ➢tl _" P 6� r w ➢ "u, ", rr E ' fy 'E� li.;:4 a 'i�I�A iyHH. P Y I i z INSWdo!MA a a oNisnoN Howas )� r � yyyppp •r 1 F{N y j' >n Lryj � s � i yiYT i T��svfYlsll�s 5 J r I + _ 1 �I r r= s uwiawmuWaa ca,a.. w7M uua ,�tJ ccsunr i d s `'• =r, fill UYN { ` r d4wy - I � � , �itT � i• � � •�. _+' r _ �R� j�+j � jj�� ti,�,�., j\...{iy�7r,` a 7ftl�.._�,. Jam' is }a _�. ! '• +%'- ^+`�. ,':' _ — E r ' ate.. y�,W � � f ♦ � �..�_� :�_. .. � .1 Secrzow Q -0 sEcrlml I, CITY` OF RANCHO eVCAMONGA qP ioz Sr - INITIAL STUDY { f EMIRONMENTAL CHECKL�',_ _t DATE: if 1 APPLICANT: F IIING DATE: NUMBER: s / v i' PROJECT: PROJECT LOCATION:` i. _ L ENVI - RO:i:4, - 'N TAY. IMPACTS, (Explanation of all ''`yes" and "maybe" answers are required on atta`,:hed sheets).' (t 3 l n ! MBE "NO 11 S and Geology" Will the proposal have significant results' in:., a. tlnstabX6 ground Conditions r in- changes in geologic relation shi ;3 b. Disru ticns , dis p_aces�mge_nt s,,compaction 'or burial ofi the soil?.3 f L- r_. Change in topography ar gi"�4nd suiface ' contour inter ais? ci d. The destruction, coverin r modificatio:c °. �i &. f am unique geologic or'physicz1 reaturest,. ' e. Any potential increase'in wind or water ; erosion of GoIl.s� affecting either on or off C Site covdltons? „ - f.. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such -� : earthquakes, landslides, mud - slides, ground failur ,/ or s*milar hazards` .. h.- An increase in the rate of extraction ancljur ^of - v une any mineral resource ?, a 2•. H A . W#.'1 the`,propoval have rCgniE: cant reso tss Tin: _ �l ..F r� a ' Page 1 � ` Y KhYBE NO a. Changes in,- , ^urrents., or the course of dsrertion Of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral stieim chancels? �I i b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage pattarns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? <, rr c. Alterations, to tK� course or J1.)w of flood waters? { d. Change in the amount of surfa �e water in any body of venter? 11 e., Mischarge into surface��watere� or any alteration of surface water q ity? 'r f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? g. Change in the quantity of groundwaters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through intzrfereitae with as aquifer? Quality? . Quantity? b. The reduction in the amount of water other- j wise available for p3blic water supplies? / ;1 i. Exposure of - people or property to waver related hazards such as flooding or seiches? 3. Air Quality. V ll the proposal have significant, -, results in: a. 'Constant or periodic air emissions frori mobile or indirect sottees? Stations y Stationary sources. b. Deterioration of ambient air uali 4 t"}" and /or Interference with the attainment of applicable air quality stiff dards? r. Alteration of local or regional climatic,, conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? ze 4. Biota Florae Will the proposal have significant results ,a. Change in the characteristics of species, Including diversity*, distribution, of number of ary species of prints? h. 'Reduction of the nunbero of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? Page 3 YrS .M YBE No Introduction of new dist;sutive species of pmts' into an area? -� d, Reduction iL..,, potenwial for agricultural production? v .. Fauna, Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or numbers species . of any of animals? w ,b, Reduction of the numbers of any uniquexf rare or endangered species of animala? c; Introduction of new or disruptiv? species',pf animals into an area, or result in a barrier f to the migration or movemont of as mals? d. ileterioration or removal of dxisting fish or - _wildlife habitat? Pogulation. NMI the proposal, have significant results in: a. Vill the proposal alt'eil the location, distri -' bution, density, diversity,_or growth rate of ` human / the population of an area b. Will, the gropcsal affect existing housing, o;: demnd for housing? create a addition--' 6. Socio- E,zonomic Factors. Will the proposal f,1 ra significant results 3n; a. Change in local or reglonali'aocio- economic characteristics, tnrluding ecr" omie or i) commercial diversity, tax r;L.4 axid property - values ?' / b. 'Will-project costs be equitably distributed among project benefiaiartes i.e., buyers, Za�c,Paers or project users?f 7. Sand Use and Planning `Considerations, Will the proposal have significant resaits in? r' a. A substantial alteration of the present or. planned land use of an area? b. A con#r ct with any designations, o6JeezivesI policitis, or adanted plans of .any governmental !I c. An impact upon 4he qulaity or gt!antity' of. eStistinx co"=ptiVe or aon- consumptive. 1 �, s'ecxe8rionaa ;:��;�ortvcnities? � `' �° l Page 4 �1 YES MAYBE No 8. 'rrantMOrtatiOn.: Will'the'proposal'have significant - results in:� a. Genarat ry of substantial additional vehicular, movement? �. Effects on existing streets, -;or demand for new street construction? C. "Effects on "z_cisring Farking faci7,ities, r demand for .new parking? d- Substar:tial im?act upon existing transporta- tion systems ?. e. Alterations to present patterns of circula t'ton4or movement of people and/or goods? f. .Alterations tip ar effectw,,on present and potentik waLk- borne, rail; mass transit or air traffic? g. Increases i,:_ traffic hazaidn to motor, vehicles, bityciists or pedestrians? Q. Cultural Resources. Will the proprosal have significant re i' in: )� a. A disturbance eo the iieegritp of archaeological, i paleontoogi =al, ;f.nd /or historical resources? 10. Health. Safetv,:and Nuisance Factors, Will tile . proposal have significZ results in; a. Creation of any health hazard or potential <Ith hazard? p , Exposure of people to potential health h4za' ds? c. \ risk of .explosion or release of hazardous.. s�,bstances in the event of an accident? d. An 1.�%crease in the number sf individuals �t nt sp�,;ies of vector or patht.4agewic organisRs or toe exposure of people to such orgar,.ias s? e.. Increase in .existing noise levels? ter` f,e „Exposure of people to potenti`dlly dangerous noise levels? r s $- The crsation of objectionable odors? �” u An increaso.in light or glare:? Page 5 XES ` AYBE N0 11. AeKthetics. Will the proposal have significant results in; ' a. The obstruction or degradation n£ any scenic vista or view? f / b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site? C. A conflict with the objective of designated or potential scenic corridors?rf 12. Utilities and Public 5'Arvices, Will the proposal have a significant need,for new ys «ems, or alterations to the followings a. Electric power? \\ rl s b. XacuraT or packaged gas? c. Communications systems? d. Water supply? / e. 'Wastetater facilities? rl f. Flood control structures? mom g. Solid waste facilities? h. Fire protection? i. Police protection? J. Schools? k. Parks or other recre r- aticaal'=ecu,±r,les? 1. Maintenance of'public facilities., including roads and flood control facilit•tes? j m. Othar, governmental services? 13. Energy and Scarce ^esaurces. Will the proposal have significant.esults in: _ a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel os enec;p? t b Substar_tial increase in demand.upor, existing sources of energy? to inc ^cease in the deman3.5or development of a new soars -es of energy? ' 4'r d. .AMY increase or pergetuntion of the ccneumption of non - renewable form% of ene ' SY,when feasible z rener�rab a sources of tlpergy are available? Page _XES PAXBE NO e.' Substantial, depletion of any nonrenewable or " scarce natural resource ?� 14, Mandatory Finda-xgs of �irani°icance. a. Does "the project have the otentiil to degrade the quality of the environment,. substantially reduce the habitat of fishrnr wildli2e ` cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sust'�31ning leve7va, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare -or ndangered plant or animal or eliminate ' impa taut examples of the major peviads of ,}, California history or prehistory? f b. Does the ngoject have the potential to achieve short -team, to the disadvantage of lung- term, environmental r$oalse (A short-term impact on the °snvironment\as one which ocrurs in a relatively brie's; d4finitive period of time rah, Ilong- term impact~ ~rill endure well into A future), c. Does the project have impacts which are individually lixited, but cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable meaus that the incremental ef£ectr `° an individual project are considerabl. ,en-,viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, and probable future projct$), v }P e _ d. Does the project have enviroumi'ntal effects ' which will cause substantial ;:Jverse effects on human beings, either ditcctly or iadirectly? n II. DISCUSSIO:t OF EMROMMI'TP1. EVALUATION (i.e. , of affirmative answers to the above questions plus a discussion. o£ proposed•tnitigatien measurE) "' a � z, r% FF Be 7 „ Pa " f'r TII. � liE"EA.*SIHRTION l `` On the �asis..of this initial ev�uation, ,V i I find the pr posed project CUi.t} NOT have a significant effect ( L on the environment, and a NEGATIVE D£CIARAiION will be prepared.,.. I'find that although the proposed project could have a'significant effect on the environment, there will be a signi£ick:nt effect -ndt in this case because the mit3gr3tian measures described on an ettached sheet have been added to the ro eo!, n NATZVE i 1 „rAxTiox WILL a P2AE, I find the proposed project MY have a sigrifxrant effect on the envirnment, and an EN IRO T 7iL°ACT PORT is requ xed. gate, Re i5 S" C) r� a , g r - � v e� rr �3 ^1�.gi "..h, aC.S_ y.....aa•,a's..',�ttC..x,_ sc._ . . . . -. ' i ATTACOMENT TO INITIAL STUDY, PART It o II. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL E.VALUAr 3N (i.e., of - 'affirmative answers to the .a ove question er` p— us ,a discussion of proposed mitigation measures). t 2(b,i) This projeci will :onstruct buildings, and parking facilities that will result in impervious surfaces and additional surface water runoff the:, could exacerbate seasonal- flooding on Amethyst, ' Prolc;t will include etentiori basin to- hold � incremental �:Mff during peak 'arm hours to mitigate flooding attributable to this projec 5(a) The projVect d'ejity; is 3.5:3 du /ac which is s nificantly higher than the strrrour;ding area. The proposed density bonus - to allow this 4ensity is based upon the af�ordabily6y of rents for senior citizen housing .consistent with ooaN'and policies of the General Plan Housing Element:' 7(a) See 5(a)': �i + 10(f) ThJs project As located adjacent to the Proposed Route 30 '! Cotw4dor which As projected to create future noise levels of 65 Ldn (assurjias 10 dB attenuation. This noise level � is considered ".conditionally acceptai*1,1" (sae Fig—V-9, GMeral Plan) provided 'adequate noise 3nsulatiori is inctudW in constructionj des igrl. A detzirlid noise - analysis for' this j project has` been prepared, The recamended mitigation 'measures for noise awtentation zhcve, 'been included in the project ^design or will be conditioned to be, ;included n project design. I t nkl ¢+ r,. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION O"E_ RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSI`>N RECOMMENDING APPROVAL 49F GENERAL FLAN AMENUMEK1 NO. 85- 41B; A-14ENDING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO HISH RESIDENTIAL, FOR 4.75 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE WES7.-- SIDE OF AMETHYST, NOF;TH OF �.9tii ti STREET - AM °201- 232 -24. tr WHEREAS, on the 15th day of January, 1985, an application was filed and accepted an the above- described project; and v SHE EAS; on the 27th day of March, 19E`* tht Planning Commission held " a duly advertised public hoaring pursuant to Section 65$5 of tiae waliforo :ia Government Code. n SECTION II. The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following in ,angst I. that the Amendment,- doves not tonflt? t with `the Land Use Policies of the General Plan. 2, That the. Amendment does promote goals of tf a Land Use Element. 3. That the Amendment would not be materially injurious � or detrimental to the adjacent properties. SECTION 2, The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that thi4 - proj'oct 'wi -Mnot create a significant adverse Impact on 0e environment and recommends i$suance of a negative Declaration on March 27s 1.35. l; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED. 1. That pursuanto, Section 85850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planing Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Zreby recommends approval of:_the ,17th day of. March,,.1985, ._..., District Change'No. 86 -01a, Z. The Planning Commission `x&aby recommends that the City Council approve and :adopt eistrict Change No. z 85 -010. 3. That a Certlfied Cop, of "this Resolution and related material t+ereby adapted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council, } } fpa _.> APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF MARCH, `198H.� � f PLANNING COW,)ISSIOW OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY.t:. Dennis L. tout, Chairman - a , ATTEST: Rick a�,;z, �Depu 'y ecretary .u/ �' I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the4igCity of Rancho Cucamonga, do Ureby certify that the fta"oing Res6!ution was `duly and , ' .�gularly introduced, passed, and 'adopted by -W7PIanning' Comrnj ion of the Itoity of Rancho Cuc,igonga,! at a regular meeting of the Piann?W. ssion hold on the 27th day of'.March, 1985, by the following vote -to- wit. `i AYES: COMMISSIONERS: + NOES: COMMISSIONERSi ABSENT: COMMMISSI NERS: ii / - 1 i RESOLUTION NO`. A RESOLUTION tI% THE RANCHO CUCAM NGA FLAP'.ING,_CO USSIOM RECOMMEN7ING OVN OF DISTRICT CHANGE 'NO. 85 -01 REQUESTING A C:o;; = =''IN THE -DISTRICT DESIGNATION FROM MEDIUM RESIDERTSFC,70 HIGH RESIDENTIAL AND SENIfRR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT FOR 4.75.AGR£S LOCATED ON THE 'WEST SIDE OF AMEMSl, NORTH{ OF 19N vTREET. i WHEREAS, og the Mh day a� January, 1985, an-application was filed and accepted an the above- descriWd- ;troject; and WHERAFAS, on the 27th day of Mar c)i, 1 s, the Planning Commission haled a duly` advertised public hearinQ.pursuant to Section 65854 of the Crlifornia Government Code. SECTION 1: Tna Rancho Cucamanga.�Tl�anning Comn.ssion has the following filings: 1. That the subject property is suitable for the,' u 'ses v permitted in .•he proposed .dis rict in terms"" access, size, and compatibility, with existing land - use in the surrounding area, and 2. That the proposed district chapla would not have significant impact on tbe,, en�.rnnment nor the surrounding R npertixgE)dhd { 3. That the proposed district change "is in conformance with the General Man and Dgvelopment Code..: SECTION 2: Th,_ Rancho Cucamonga Planning Comm scan has found that this project will not create a significant adverse inpaSt on the environmw►t,�- and recommends issuance of a NegatSve Declara'cion on March 27,1985, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, 1. That purs *jant to S tion", 155856 to 55855 of_ the California =nr.. rnment Code, that the Pla..Ving L'x��rfiayn of the city nf;Rancho Cpcamcaga heweby , recutn ends apnrdval on the -27th -Oay q� :: March, 1885, . District Viange hu. $541,. c 2. The 'Kahnirrg iort. iss3on here4y r-, nds�-that the G City Council approve and adapt Dist fetS Charge No. 85 -01. e , /0701-02 o 3-27-85 PC Agenda 3, That -a ,Certified Copy of thi ; Resolution "and" rep ated mat�ri ' hereby adopted by``the Planning iscion shall b forwarded to-the City Council. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH LAY OF MARCH, 1985. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE'CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: D °nnis L, Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission ofAhe City of Rancho Cucamonga, _do hereby certify tkat the foregoing Resolution. was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the ,Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga," at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of March, 1985, by the following vote -to -wit; AYES COMMISSIONERS; NOES: "COMMISSIONERS. ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS. r, Y RESOLUTION NO, A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELORENT REYIEW NO.. 85.01 LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF NrtliYST, KATH OF 19TH MEET IN THE �IGH RESIDENTIAL DISIRIGT it WHEREAS, on the,; >5th day of January, 1985, a complete`app7ication was filed by TAC Development Corportiorf for review of the above - described project; -5 and ,WHEREAS, on the 27th day of March, 1985., the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the abAve- described project.. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as f0lows: :r SECTION 1: That the following can be met: 1. That the prcpose�)project is consistent with to objectives of the General Plan; and w 2 That the p=aposed use is in accord with the ` objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is locatedz,.actd S. That the proposed u e is in compliance .with each of " the applicable proiisions of the Development Code; and t 4. That the proposed use, togethor with the conditions applicable thereto, will not5e detrimental to the health, safe or iialfar�, or materially 'public injurious to properties or improvements in the �,_ - - -_- vicinity. j I SECTION 2: That this project will not create _ai�verse, impacts on the ! environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on M&ch 27, 1985 I SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 85 -01 is approvfs"',subject to the fallowing conditions and attached Standard Conditions: , ILLfek' PLANNIHS DIVISION shall 1. Existing Eucalyptus trees be retained wherever EQssjti?,� and grading plan Adjusted. accordingly. Trees shall be trimmed and topped. A Tree Removal Permit shall be obtained prior to approval of rough grading;plan for those trees that must be removed because of 'structures or paving` A plot plan of existing Eucalyptus trees shall be submitted with the Tree Removal Permit, showing heir precise locat on,and size. Said plan shall take into account the proposed grading, what trees are to be retained, triWng methods, and where new trees will be planted for replacement of removed trees. 2. The recommendations of the acoustical engineer, with the proposed Ifreeway, shall be strictly adhered to as described in the Neise� sessment dated Fe! -ujary 21, 1985. 3. Dense lar including 15 - gallon size evergreen gees Zcapinq spaced 15�Feet on center4 shall be provided along neith, s6th and west boundaries, (existing Eucalyptus -trees preserved `may be credited toward this requirement). .. 4. Sp6tial landscaping treatment shall be provided between Amethyst and Building t, particularly around the edges and within the basin, including mounding and specimen -size trees. 5. A continuous wrought iron fence,, ' imilar, shall be provided around the basin for safety purposd 6. Fencing shall be provided around the entire project for ~ security including security gates and "Knox" boxes at both _. accesses from Amethyst. Details,shall be reviewed and approved by the Foothill Fire District and Sheriff's Department. 7. A minimum five (6) feet of landscaping shall be provided on both sides of the project entrance. 8. Canopy shade trees shall Lbe provided throughout common opep,,.___. space area._.._, 9. Appi cMit shall contact U.S. Postal Service' to determine, if mail b�7xes can be provided in the lobby of each building Yor proximf�y to residents. r, 10. Cupboards, countertops and a sink shall be, provided in each activity room of the recreation building. 11. Approval of Oevelopment Review, 85 -01 is granted subject to approval of General Plan Amendment 85-01B, Development District Amendment 85 -01. 1 ; P laming Commission Resolution Development Review 85 -41 Page #3 12. Approval of- levelopment Review'85 -01 is granted subject to " approval of a Development Agreement granting a deniity bonus to allow the project density not to exceed 35.4 dwelling units per acre, and the parkirj) ratio shall not • °be.,.less than 1 space /unit. 13. A detailvi, exterior lighting plan shalt be submAted indicating adequate or. -site lighting of common areas, walkways and parking areas. _ 14. Safety features and materials shall be provided, including skid resistant materials,;' in sidewalks, patio areasy stairs; handrails on stairs or paved grades, and bathro= fixtures. 15. Curb cuts and wh �t m chair ramps shall be provided site design for limi-tedfmobil#y or non - ambulatory residents. 16. Pedestrian . -s; ety features shall be provided, including, clearly marked walkways, a4equate lighting, and designated crosswalks in parking areas, any use of pedestrian signs. 17. Additional traf enclasure shall be provided west of building 3 ' and 4. G. ENGINEERING DIVISION: 1. Developer sh j., provide additional pavement i� mast side of Amet'nyst io provide for left `'.urn pocket) into proposed development. 2. On -site retention basin shall be provided to 'the satisfaction of City Engineer and Building Offic a "r. The pr f5e' design is subject to,final plan check approval. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF,MARCH,'1985. PLANNINf,COMMISSION OF THE,•4ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chaimatk. ATTEST 4 Rick Gomez,,Deputy Secretary f Planning Commission Resolution Development Review 85-0 Page #4 I, Aick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Manning Commission of the City rrf RanCho Cucamonga, do h6reby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly'acd regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular- meeting of the Planning Commission held ' on the 27th day of March, 1985, by the fallowing vote -to -wit; AYES. COMMISSIONERS. NOES. COMMISSIONERS. AH,SENT. COMMISSIORERSi a� rj e q O�� A g9pu O.Y..UY- _ 6x�dyb Ur Oy? 6�1p CN6 Wi q0 LqT� •..p. q GuE `yNU� s. '03 q T.�qg ��.\`CA ..„A30R -{.7 u ou e= ray-aw 3. z O s Ot - A nr".up V Ci C a n na 4a,� OOOOOOU c✓. x yYC y_....0 lSi •� db.. : 4y+°y Ewr ��S LU GC6p.0 4gAYq p _g VG6 � enCYg3 LQY _i xyV .v wV yYq �� Cl- 4t N.M +O'4.R CaJY CL bOYC 'y 01 04.5- y..... O A �Q NEN p GUC .+3C qu cLY ti�00'gg cON �C O BYT9 w YENAG P C g O Y. 0 � V a G O Q - Ml- OYCgN Lop zyyE 2c p LV d 4 N r y 9Nyu V a 4 V a N a r n L+ O��S� •O dq,y0c.. LO: ..Ca u u CpLON ^N.3 AEG m o� A -u. p+ m v 2. mem c ^M EO��epYC a o 01 ,.� ybp 0�Ee6 Iq qC�rt 6 O V < p 'b C�N 40 aqL II.q�� =i J`qO 'O ?SS C tl�� c ticcL px� 93�CpAV C Vt C8 qG aq GCS NV pC O- �u�LCNN V t wuN qr •0 4 V J'�O}� q.rG pA� 3�oL6Y -N .b Anaym .�L". 0'C� O! yC:C��yLF� _ CJ is rl.afNO �q. -.O� it «d+ppi O� R� JGLw�,.- 4lsy.0 V Vc. �v3i va se. EC ..s. a-i C V yg NII pie C Gt@ L -a.!- On, L_: Vdc C aaYV M�qw pNtY. OV 6 +4A qV 2NL Z- V-:+O F-+OOa >�1 CVrLi N3LuL _V 4MVN. t1.'u n -^ N �. w. 4OON3 ZO,V 6U GcnE aO 23 rVG u �{ tq.i 1 Y N 1 Aft kL Z O aia AA 00 ,�: qS! L w'C' \i 4 Z5, Z T p NC. qOQ ECd fi. Grc. 2 p di Ca y�..r J 4 Vaa y. �.eC�gY' y 1' gg�Sc. 4N os� so XN\'r w � cp nN cc�c 3 yw tJ f Q N N O.� w ` •E G n O Y Co =`g ,= celf I= R VO�u4�` V MVCya�i�4�V Rv caylq .0 i +eeo a ..,o uo pub ►d m+cm �e masrm �O�rn. , CCa. GMV2q 7 4 >.4q .2 ►"4T H . u yt CC OWn Li COQ Ol. O tp i m Y 0 U 4 r c m i 3333 u.�c q. aoRn v Ca ppe NWQS ^m.0 v° gFp >d�p µC4m Om +.. °. '^a C C.g y ►L' as _U.'CDN p ryL. c N rLa.Zd ��6 O Ya W � �yca..NU t°a �acc,z nyy t► mmmau° m °uooSO ��We ,D -- 23 OTNgp`u mca b vty V+ oC .. 6C} Em.e '.'4a E9'�� aR ob n, v ei osm A. a aa+ o,o •`ono �L.> on n rq .c +. m� v ¢ u T rR c^, �. � om q L ny y„''n o oi e. G � 9 eJ m m ;o F6;, m � x q ... E n •* m ,� n 2 _rn �Y ,�irn tmL.m�`.aa v^ U Vim N'P6 CA...SS N �.6 C O tVVyi N:O �= 'P! S L Z m Y U. ... m..C.- mE q6 L >OU my Qvsi ' Z— L 6 NNN L S ��> E.... TO uY ►a h dA\'C m _ aaYU amt i A. pE C �Oi_a. ,^.� L 4r O.C= EL► ° m u�y� q c Ca°+µ nYm ; ► u.,E�^'�a 'r^lm4 Cu�� . �� 4 s'SNT °�YU N' NL mt mTmC6 mY N9. q O cNNN �Nnnj aiC ^ ►y S L-g ny U ^ �pO CLC-2 m d NS 9.� O:r� O �d ryn�Vm aE O m0 u C m y >Cwm�'am -0.- ^O Gy Ery 6CLLm O4��► -.NEa ? yC ►YgO YQ C Y.- .OaymC -rz �9 a.:4rse b�Y DVC 6 ^CM n 6 a r UI va a. om ao°.�c'Ey a M' ay" iz�cn. ° Q g° 4 m �.. ' �✓ L 1� V N' SSw^ O� iO p E 6 91,p. ° 06 P y C O G 4 G q 6 G 0 Y y m sNU °O ui Ziuv aanu ►_ � _�� l 3 I i t i +eeo a ..,o uo pub ►d m+cm �e masrm �O�rn. , CCa. GMV2q 7 4 >.4q .2 ►"4T H . u yt CC OWn Li COQ Ol. O tp i m Y 0 U 4 r c m i 3333 u.�c q. aoRn v Ca ppe NWQS ^m.0 v° gFp >d�p µC4m Om +.. °. '^a C C.g y ►L' as _U.'CDN p ryL. c N rLa.Zd ��6 O Ya W � �yca..NU t°a �acc,z nyy t► mmmau° m °uooSO ��We ,D -- 23 U•` a.o goon of aR ob n, v ei cm +n a aa+ u �Vm° r+cz y UZ O L ny UY •- oi wO S I r Nr n au$ ,�irn tmL.m�`.aa v^ U Vim N'P6 CA...SS N �.6 C O tVVyi N:O �= 'P! S L Z m Y m..C.- mE q6 as Q _ wQ►.o7; m6 ^C'O> _ aaYU amt imm .Aq p E A. pE C �Oi_a. tit O° OTCL a. 4 O° d 04 A V ^ 9 t N L M i +eeo a ..,o uo pub ►d m+cm �e masrm �O�rn. , CCa. GMV2q 7 4 >.4q .2 ►"4T H . u yt CC OWn Li COQ Ol. O tp i m Y 0 U 4 r c m i 3333 u.�c q. aoRn v Ca ppe NWQS ^m.0 v° gFp >d�p µC4m Om +.. °. '^a C C.g y ►L' as _U.'CDN p ryL. c N rLa.Zd ��6 O Ya W � �yca..NU t°a �acc,z nyy t► mmmau° m °uooSO ��We ,D -- 23 y O d • 6 n� 4� u S C i u b S tc a < d� • �� d N° w 0 Y` t G a YY ' ` °QEYa 9wd a0 GVdQ ��m Y. �b� a�u tPli iV\ F�".s <.��va •• Eco i'. nioac Sri �.. ,°off di0 C U � \ wC> YNyZi ^Q �i. � d V �.>• T.a N � O�y ipN= CD �. �9 d:TA0 a�dTw O NNa^ �y�O. 9 aMY im G.. i KL.�4�A�Y^ A� 9WN QPC< <Q (N <�V ...ym• Yn ° .000 � �y. Lt.4N wyLY t CI. L'O ata C� d� d� O O N 5d< a� a m N Q � •� y a w ^^ n N�� d � d Ota g 99 t'L O °Y� N.Z >C ir�-F ^60 = n O .•O+ �� C.6�di - !J yyO C q� d.r. T d 6qn s rn P y al d w - ,C.Y MT dd^ Aq:<Lri tCC� ^aOsY ipt ° a.Nd tQ.�� °taCwq� aY 6vN G: �1FOi m 9T. Uyy w d Has Lie i Q Yw C° IS ,a as i•. V� TapMY < I d 6 CCl •Oa1R C •- a . ay.. c '° n.c. °•' c it a ON Nd >6^ �LO� YNr L C• Y w�$ owv wv ctl a .°l n L Pte.°+ d a.N t(•n aVla <u.:v oa u t•. o.a o.w F-•`na I m r wmei or cn d� mo- c„ pT Sn qRp na4Y ,°cncy v Na y d 0 L� E w Oy dnT �`r NM �BY w0 < Y "$ P a b u.73,; P � P m :� a tl I.za <°_<L t� � 6 ,O O° L. m �nrr _ wM OY L L C < YY qY O y O• .O N C 4O �Cb N ^ • u CIV qH UTO< °�+.my E ^ A dq. �t _< Tma ~�y ^a 6pQ <Y ��- LU a wV •yC O. N.r Um < .YEES v*;; ts N w . < Nc aOi O w Me r- yOC ' 0c . 06CP w.� u'° 34 T-c"9val + a ^j 'e c m` w¢ ` a, L vY BS. • Y q.Y y40...0 Laa •e l�` NG C9p0 -.=79 LC` NYd 'd Lq N,t,• nL G+ 1(v a.A. ua a'.a•m Pqa ERU d °� 9wo u v w m ,L •a 2 E a•� y O N a q q m N COQ � PA N ^' wL+O• Y w6wd O { YL'�t V. q tt 'O C Y Y y w Dl i q E N IF at V = N tl`OL ^Q.ytl PPV u. r ' nmR µ �C =9u 6.L NY. w9. U. C �4 •rY.d< Y =y wLn L r 9CL LL6 X O-X > 49N l�Ow KV 49 Owrn � �N nw WmN � N CN.- a'NO F. K,G d 4 �I ",<1 al a• w N r b4q qw a��. �. 4. .•G.V R� iC C ,q R,,, iT - �+ C :142 CwE g �a�V UpLL6a 4L `D+G V cL �tbb qr Oda TU�a� �EivC S rqi a'D N p OQ q•w me ti k � dy .. r i +D �cu o «. Aaaiu j °'c °i 'y � �� °-. c.- ao ^y u c�.w a°cfia qqs Vw SwNaro u KN�N L. ar• Dr^ �.m ✓� a¢a� td..g tl o qau. nL o '. l 4J dF . CS pt:a °.t LxmH mar i6�wa � i =per `o y ap wta. ab Y =y q.a�Q�wa x bEW mm dQ. y Lgq-N4 Q q y a, 4 U Qp ro.� F. �g q Cym�p;� ti u = L t� •�.. u . «Dam ,q^ _ U. �y�C•�� Ni w q dtl. ^d. v,--9 ppa V Vy r u� N 5.... YVw4 �'�• N� 4t 3.Q(a �p 'b9.rC 3tDSy ...L ^q Q W m uQV,w G _ Oat EO NEyg ar Ya d N }s •Nwb L.U4 L^ CS ^+��1 d Qr.Yli Lam.. I, d�U�. gG1CN by b�. -'u L. VqU xc + . Ql CaM _Z: g r3 ?. o a ¢61 y�A.. L h � � wrL 9pNQ LLi3.$pM� 'mU gbJC an d A �� r 2 O s N a4dCa Ytt yO W d L a1u dL , LLLj >} IV r N V } Cep L pL{. a .0 .. V W 4 VV aaW • ty�Gryya 84 b Fa a C ro O Lp `yV.r ! r. : t O d O •.{ N a'T p" qrr a N l•f .e11r G � 1 QQ i+ .•G.a 4m' Ca.0 Y ro• =m R a+Y.b �•q a c Vy' Luc G a:' a a` Ful bcc Y Y C A N..Un $ L Cam C 1aOL � Tt�.a w° .,, d 4 m L N4• V C 6y " Q r VyD• uY V LDib > b. w 4 a+ N �U Y tJ G y G� at*yq. D a b <d O V a t.n 4a U Bpd C ?•,. a � � Q GIN qmm4 p'.. wan. wD.. T iN .tea. LOYU p� .qq � a � C ,q yCl a.. ty pw s. D.. 1 l Et V a V N4 •T.. T,.�.... D ~Qy <TyE V o "C V.q Y. r +� O JCL y �y w.i NT 4pl ?T ti•Q. SD Gitl1 A G .qY q �bn ��. ssS X � CyyUU roE�rC. S ay� �:a aq up 4qM, qt M'i GC" � u a.. gOro u f•w �yt s qVr s�.66.0 gvma. 4i att qQ yZ. u3 i a aa:Y sa.. tGUNs N o wL a;r44 U ^» 40.y 3w ME GrL� .Gq .912 t4.q a'!pp•S. H L MK4 Oti Vaw !{r y U wi w+�"tp ar✓ y }o by Mp..Q.L L ++ O Vic= Ea = CY.a pt u.�.e4.L Res �q .ate a^yuM.uVa. Nyi r� ra CC LC ur aA Q+;+ D }�� v� �p 3u latgt OrinO OD ';. mt8 GG�1UVy }9w. T U b �= ygb mG+a Opt O4gY�Q pL EH rU6 6R G N y64C y y�bm 4 i1] �N`� LCm LVLCy. Q L.•a q. q4T rzt 4A.a d f }jD(Ft i t r5t Lis.Va Q M A R Njj "'�`jy��• Ag i r a Y m tltlVfl S4 p. i L I q O Y O�tl 3 q.C.b.tlT fi..V". yqw cU X01. b..^.0 �1 9EfJ a � � v. �.. nttl a � at AN E1 t)rC .tlt �� y��yy tlnII P� Ay as qa 4w. A- tlNr.L C. L -: bt^ � + Nt�,CDtp bq iCni 4V l v utl >aD tQ R � .X q. w� CN E u.T' QM� C Ctk .T- ^ C b Y AiN ,e a. U alb; Vie 4 TCIf•� MR � tit O,. N V V 9 E S Y'S pR V G �.�'.' q t�•q.e.e �<. � .tra C ,I C. U L. ". +G. 4r� y^ L1 �4 AVQ OtiA 'i tlY� 5y d 1�M�O �� L H N V p n m } Y q s�vu. aLt 4¢i wx t°ror NC CSi x r t Lq N tlwi as tnn+n }4 L w4�a t a aLLCV Mpp ga.pb �R C Lqw yr byC aYL +�tGM Y q�Yp btb� rR. t NwM �''Yb 4YCa. � �uVSU�`._Egy yq c CC ..ql id q. C� tlNlr - y E zz FAOb a� a G1 Y R�q L0... LA S��NC Y£«•.� tLb.4u D'p. Litli r�i Q Q »rV NUS! G�� ^y_y' CC�S Y�i C L"^ Dili Lu -.!-a $ b p. q�.ti; YD..O�CCAi@ �iG t24gCw Otl ro D tl<y.,.C,.Gtl 4✓imb.OM ny OpD - G�as�Ni CW tlx �. v,+'.�+u.e . q NC VAN. NRgb itY ^MM 4E 9NN4�� 7Q...,.,�.y 9b' � a�y� yCO� C'uiC Na. u'4» "�"taititl`i � N a yG V qa.„ t FT 6 se Di a.', ELL0.V 4� NMw� NMN9Vn 6 yQ 42: Qa N b D Nom' C C.i y'^q tC awy"M 9 4 Me,! Y ffi .fig a��µyy Cb �N tV•w�,p c ... c..�A m. � as c c agoViA bat0 „L. bH g !% -0 �qws ` CC Loin B } D �utl��p 6DL 'p.CN VCtl DL+q.R� �t %Cb n� at r”` G�. 3182tiM tltl9> NgNl�gG Cu'~^'@ �6 GYM. Laai t �b qtT y„w yaOCCC N C+ ov+ NRaV ? O Cot. -aae Ac,ft , ,� vavvi�.. -, C °m qq aq. -it ta.m�as `qaa Va cna ? �ro g L O L E T a uW K O % ^y Q q -O.9 CS 2 p S r• O` r pw. �l y rH r Yv L6PlLe} pOL � G W Oa YIL aY1 n y, QQ _ iA W Q �H T p -eel d� OdP O N C eq N � uY \r 1 W~ ME6 i GLo LL= 7 1, N� OT. • ^��1 +' ViJq`xiV � 4 4 dC� L q "i Lib V U 4 c tz. n c> iL y u °a AVy~ E 95 CL ah. ui q �+ 'S i r RA,.. d +u mid„ u rJ ° Cl. q.•q.� u q. Y D7 C ¢ ��. s p '°� 'o •- Amy LZ Vq..� Qom. 9 nid. Y e � V A.,T.a a ;a v ff aNU NnW A.�•q Q H Y IAQ «w v1 pL mac+ .iy O1 ,1j 0 V C a a Y Q A p d n y +• R �V '• � �_ =L �M« b w N Y Y Y nL i Y N� � rwY 4 LL S A 6T VQ Q Q �. �. q Y V 3 E d O O d .O r• 6 4 T 6 W c �o 4 a (i` �N =ti N Y - W i)s d Vii. LYUI. �y • wgW O N .n do, Od QU a Hd Ly. 3Q. i O^ pR YYw9 hey dLwCgL .1r jy r4Li 9n Q.1TT �u0 d.Y Qy Y pV T E'MN LCSp vM 4� w AC d46 `pg 6YY.« T'� O Y q A: U G..+� 'byct g L O L E T a uW K O % ^y Q q -O.9 CS 2 p S r• O` r pw. y V i T p -eel d� Cyp� 1 W~ i GLo LL= 7 1, N� OT. • ^��1 +' ViJq`xiV � 4 4 dC� L q "i Lib V Ti C.•. 4 tz. n c> iL y N + °c d v AVy~ E 95 CL ah. ui q �+ 'S o sa RA,.. d +u mid„ rJ ° c� k s p '°� 'o •- u ass Y e � V A.,T.a a ;a v ff aNU NnW A.�•q Q H Y IAQ «w v1 pL 'µ" R H Q q -O.9 CS 2 p n O` r pw. y V i T p -eel d� i GLo LL= N 1, N� OT. • . .w.. �` Y ViJq`xiV � 4 4 dC� L q "i V Ti C.•. 4 tz. n c> iL y N + °c d v AVy~ E 95 CL ah. q �+ 'S o RA,.. d +u mid„ rJ ° Ash qs. .FL',Q s p '°� 'o •- M Y e � V A.,T.a a ;a v ff aNU NnW A.�•q Q H Y IAQ «w v1 pL ti q ov r 6 loc () yLC Qi A v ZZ 019 igUy. -. \i ti O1W ON r.. O� ac c U LL.1l a Ss O a 2 ~L > D Y_t,1 r � Y W a N m Y U 'ZNL L Ma ° y LNi m a X04 C � Oq Yb Mb. L .0 b AL M U- SKY L d6 me carte = o�; m o- ora CyY C C 4w.. �E t3 w cCam. Cry. E 4CS a .... w.. �. a.MQ W �� .C°•,3d � e� µN i. tWC w � � w1 r. '. 9..p ^OU d °L muy�« ~v y °s^ ° c ovpv3 w V y 4.v ON. �i a Z6 � q� LEE; I. w 1LO ,Kd / KI CITY OF R_ANrHO CUCt -VT ONGA STAFF REPORT A0 G�''n' _ a i U DA'iE: Mari;4 27, 1585 -^ 1917 TO: Ch�Jrman and Members of the Planning Gownission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL 9SSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT;- TAC DEVELOPMENT - A'Development Agreement between the City of ` Rancho Cucamonga and TAC Development Corporati =on regarding a senior citizen housing project to be located on the west side of Amethyst, north of 19th Street - APR 201- 232 -24. ABSTRACT: This report contain s�nformation describing Staff's efforts to develop and negotiate a Ion% -term development agreement bimtween the City and TAC Development. Cored ation, the key points of the agreement and a copy of the draft agreemgt. BACKGROUND: In January o!� this year, TAC Development Corporation submitted applications for Development Review, General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to allow the construction of 168 senior citizen apartment units on 4.75 acres of land located on the west side of Amethyst, north of L "th Street. A part of the applicant's request (see attached), were certain development incentives as pr6vided for i"a the Senior Housing Overlay District and administrative guidelines. These incentives include an increase in the number of dwelling units per acre, waiver of fees, reducing the number of required on -site parking space& - - -- below that which is usually required, waiving the requirement for covered on -site parking, and reimbursement for off -site improvements. In order to grant incentives and guarantee that the apartment units developed as a result of these development incentives remain occupied by and affordable to senior citizens, Staff prepared and ne;otiated a long- term Development Agreement with TAC Development. The proposed agreement has been completed and is attached for your review. SUMMARY OF DEVELOPKNT AGREEMENT: The California Government Code (Section 65864 -6 .meows cities to enter into agreements with developers, the contents of which shall specify the duration of the agreement, the permitted uses of the property, the density or intensity of use, the maximum height and size of_: - the proposed buildings, and provisions for reservation or dedic-Aiai of land for public purposes. - The following:is a summary of the key points of the Agreement: ITEM G PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ' TAC Development Agreement March 27, 1985 Page 2 J Target Tenants. The tenants who will reside in the project are restricted (except in emergency situations as ,specified , in the, agreement) to individuals who are fifty -five (55) years old or older., or married couples whose head of household is fifty -five ($5';-years old or older. Affordable Rents. The proposed rental formula is identical to the renta armula approved for the2Calmark Heritage Park development. Rents charged will be affordable to low and moderate income senior citizens (equal to or less than 80% of the current County of San Bernardino_ median income.) Affordable rents are defined as 30% of t� moohly income as follows; Unit Description Rent w /Incentives Rent w/o Incentives 473 s q. ft. 1 bd /1„ba = $3991month $600 /month I 645 sq. ft. 2 bd /1 ba $445/month $6251month 731 sq. ft. 2 bd /2 ba $520 /month $650 /month Resp.eved Units. One hundred percent of the units constructed, -358 are reserved for low and moderate 'incase `senior citizens for a perioto,'of twenty (20) years. Shuttle Service. A tvtelve- passenger shuttle van must be avai ab a for —e ht hours out of each day to transport senior citizens to shopping and services, and community activities. ' On -Site Manager. A. -full time manager must be provided at all times, on the project si:w In additirn, an assistant manager shall be available during shuttle van service Hours driving the van or managing the project when the full time manager is driving the van. Tenant Committee. The Agreement establishes the right of residents to form a committ8e composed of tenants for the purpose of organizing social activities and providing input ` to the property owner regarding. he operation of facilities of the project. ;. PLA16ING COR41 "aSiiN STAFF REPORI; 4 TAC 'Development Agreemeni'' mrah V. -1985 Inge 3 l n o� t� -this Development Agreement a ?so includes provisions for'arinua\City review and inspection of the project and maintenance guarantee to insure that the maintenance of the project it peTrormed - accordance with the maintenance :plan as outlined in -she Senio`� Housi q Overlay District administ�vative guidelines. A the development incentives requested by the apps and their impact upon the proposed rents is ,attached for," ur � review and consideration. Calmark has e#,Jmateid in heritage 'ark that each $100,000 worth of development iri�entives offered 'by the City would equate to approximately a $4.00 kar month -rent red- Ition. Therefore, the primaky development ;nce tine offerred by the City is th'CZsubstantiai density increase, V. RECOMMENDATION: is recogmended that��thp Planning Commission review and provide recommendations *on the Development Agreeme�t,to the City Council. I! - 0 Re e, • y submitted,- ck Gomez Y' it er (Attachments: Applicant's Request & Pro Forma Draft - development Agreeifip► 1 � pia d 1? r I EYPi�3Pzi�°. tf March 05,:. 1985 CITY( RANCil -'f . +:6l�,hhvC� rrAA nn City of Rancho Cucamonga A9�t p P. 0. Box 807 "i8�9J)�iitt11 Rancho-Cut ainanga, CA. 91730 Attn: Otto Rroutr,� Dear Otto: In response to our pps -kj ication meetings tin the Seniors Housing, we have compil ;fd the requested information for submittal: Site Acreage - -- - --- - - -- - - - -- - -4.75 acres AML Density------------------------------ 14'Unitv-,= acre 3 Proposed Units - -- ------------------ 66 1 bedroom I Bath-- - - -30 2'Bedroom 1 Bath- -- - -24 2.Bedroom 2 Bath-----12 1� ? Pat - ------------------ - ------------ 06 j' _Pry \tkents_(Wfithout Incentives) firoom 1 Bath - -- _-$600.00 %month Z_S� dreom 1 Bath - -- - $625.00 /.-month 2 Cedroom 2 Bath - - =- -$650.00 /month In there is any further information you need please 1pt us know. Sincerely, Terry A. Christensen; Presi -d'ent - 11 �l 7E333HELLMAN' � � � �,'4'C�{}0 CQ 7. riA,C,kL1f6P • (714)99§4ft5+ .Ai,91730 ��.•.t_ < �. ��p .._sir #mac rj October 11 1984 r4 f Rancho Cucamonga Ps_ �, ,Box 803 Rar:ctib Cucamonga, CA. 91730 Attn: Otto Kroutil Dear Otto. In response to our pre 4o- rication meeting on "thQ'Sania; ?s Housing, w° have compiled thz requested in.fiurmation for � J} _ submittal, Site Acreage -- - --------------- -.4,.75 acres y- - - - - -� _- v35.'s units /acre Density - -- ° Proposed Units ----------------------- 1,68 1 Bedroom 1 Bath - - -78 2 Bedroom 1 Bath - -- -'60 t 2 Bedroom 2 Bath -30 Parking - -- - --- --------------------- 168 Proposed Rents (With Incentives) 1 Bedroom 1 Bath - - -- $399.00 /month x? rU .r 2 Bedroom 1 Bath - -- -$445.00 /!oonthk 6.0 4r47r 2 Bedroom 2 Bath -- --$520.00 /mo: th Y � 7 - ts..,d-etl Incentives y� �zt ]a. AY ;;.. Current City Fees - ---Approximately $135ti9SOrt0 TOTAL FECS, T. $135,950,00 We would request all City Fees_6e, waived, and consideration be ' 9i4en by the Planning Department to assis? in design fea'�titres to sage unnecessary cons;- ruction costs. Also enclosed you will find Proforma's wl fir. and wi:thoUj incentives_ ;.� � , ry,�,�s �lnry��-y ,� 4 n;��+. '&. fF73_�.u�" � RLL�,+,u'�iX Ay . M �A i7,H !.cps Fl.1Ajoj-ttVL .�.+<s.i41r VSs1Y. Y�. 3d Ui7 6 I3�fi f77•yC ,e-1. J;. ;p: - - - if you have any questions or require and additional nfor-- J; mation please call me at 989 -1725, Sincerely, 7err� ristenseii President 7RCE I c I ti it i , = - 1.i 2 1R a . r. "1 4 t MP xA I Al ±'��`3�,+.F TAC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION } SEKOR5 PROJECT P PROFORMA WITHOUT x 14 DU/AC ,INCENTIVESt CONSTRUCTION COSTS Land Costs SSOO,OOO.UO Building @ #36 /sq. ft. Elevators 00.00 Onsite- Offsite Improvementsee Attar~1f `"n4;705.00' Landscaping & Pool ,000.00 �,.;,� f Recreation Building 40,0OO,,DD Architect &r 'Engineering Fees 200,000.00 �{ City Fees (See Attahced) 75,950.00 TOTAL 2,333 2175.00 Finance Cost Loan Fee 3% $ 70,OQ0.00 Construction Interest 201,'10.00 �. Miscellanecut Fees 1D a0.00 28ifi0. UtT TOTAL /( TOTAL COST (Without Land) 12 614,775,00 f ; P1OPOSFi) INCOME AND €`XPEkSE (1�.1401JT INCENTIVES) Average Rent $615 x 66 = $40,JS90.00 Grass Income $40,690.00 x 19 $.487,080.00 Operating Expense f27X) t13i,512.00) Vacancy Factor E 3 %) 14,612.00 TOTAL QPERAING INCOME Debt Sev'vice B 13k% (35Z.914.00) TOTAL it.N%rfjoCj .%M0v,4GkCA~T..TFORNIA917°;1 • i 1 "9f `T'5' p 4 CO_ NSe�RUCTION ')C05T& / f f Land Costs $500,60. Do C Building @ $36 /,sq. ft. $ $3,513,340.00 Elevators (5) 1 15,01000.00 Onsite-0ffsite provements (See Attached) 3 374,705,00 y; Landscaping & {{bo�l 1 110,,0 -}0.00 Recreation Builving 3 30,(_=.00 Shuttle Bus y 2 20,000.00 Architect & EngTneeringUFees 2 230,000.00 City Fees (ee Attached) . .00 -- 'TOTAL ! !�4-4gB4O455.00 ' '. Finance Coat Loan Fee 3 1 13- 2,850.0`0 Construmtian Interest 3 310,900.00 M'i,�cellanepu:s Fees 1 1.,000.00 TOTAL 4 452,850.00 lp T $4,e:8O,895.00 t PROPOSED INCOME AND EXPENSE (WIYH INCENMi LS _ $31,122. 11)) 0U 1 Bedroom, 1 Bath $399 x 78 _ 2 Bedroom, I Bath $445 x 60 _ $26,700.00 2 Bedroom, 2 Bath 4520 X 30 _ $15,600.00 TOTAL MONTHLY $73,422.00 ' �y T 11881 , Gross Annual Income $73,422.00 x 12 .$ 1 ., O ✓/ 2 Miscellaneous Income � 4,032.00 �i M 620,778,00 �I Debf Service (,131j%.. 0 001 TOTAL 5 50 319_0°0 lI ' '� � t {1 r ��#s y�(. 7'y ��,�� ^�[��,?i 'fig �y� yy�� /+�7' (� �t ��/�� ] (a � T �+ �j � p (�y{ {�/� ; a Y D Ll z ESTIMATE DESCRIPT PECIFICATIM a7n' r' t7fe ua aaY �t i = - } i -41 i} z } ..Ln' 3R C 7t�f!.. �-� :•rY.i .5t- i`t,��„�!,�9 '� ` U � 4 +i� � T —W 313c- Wall dt. \�"3.7nv�n.' ] <• � ' 7 ;.ti f t "• .'1 1' c. .... -. 77 - •�2t11- —wine .:.. �,.',R•.y^� — "4',�`, 3'9 1 6 .7 to s Wi \30 rLR ,c, zj- 4 w r 5 ., QL7A>�tTI_�� -T p�g '_TOTAL PRICE E8TllATE DESCRiP. iPYCIFICAT'IONS QUANTITY iT PP,ICE TOTAL PRICE b3are _a fl i - .} x,•34`%+ L%:a�W�. { _i� � 'A:.'x 3,3 00 r'4• cA ba. iwl '. P. s j #+ ac� s- TFF f f _^, f ► ff �L tt�+?ctlt IT Cali — ate i6kj l%rR2, } j ri f I, . i is w a H i ro ro sE.. 0 w CL. it U F ro ,b L ti tN C N O 2 L O •r G N 0 i o O CL i c to O V 4.3 c a} CL - U } S_N L. � BiY o to + b N U •r•e^ i2 c Q} = L v +} d Q} F-' r`• 0 SJ} f q f,_ 0,, a-+ •-+ o C7i6q ? 13 4J c . ro a 00 crn c c a} '•- m o c to r+p - U } S_N L. � BiY o to + b ,ry.a U •r•e^ i2 c Q} O L Qi .0 to O Q} w c •r9 +} d Q} is C ZT t-+. S. l(1 to fa 0 SJ} 0,, a-+ •-+ o C7i6q ? 4- S 4J c . ro a 00 crn c c a} 41 ^ sa > Qi 4.3 ; a) 04 a C3 c 1° J Q) 44 4t+ 't) \ 4J CL 3 O ct vi ca} oc O, a4J Emo ca N 3 O R ®+�07 •n +gym o x tL} .'G E• n. rf- j` U U _ Oro • -_ O' n N . ,aa ,as E C� E UD. C C) . E n. CL W. C. S, N N_ N O Ql to c V9 tU it1 tD q-., O - to to to o is Cisa cm Lo a c d MMe4 r -4 r4e4 'O-S H 11C7 V 64 4,4 N N QJ a a, Li- LL. .01 ;-} 'IOU N E c N. i. Cio aro} lU Gs. L •r Q) O w 4- fl} (D d t6 tt� 41 a) a } 0 43 a a ro '00Na N rPN N\ O N w 4J N rot> M.t ms t l .- U to to 0} ci 0 c -0 4- E a- cn e nam °aim% >¢ cu ucmu; S- c at to O. 3 L d tC O V) t-Oi .m.. CLI ro ro a U 'q Qf 4- 3 a-+ y> rn y }a N rr 0. S.. y _ C 4J ca cn 4 a tYl E a 63 4J �} d r of �. a C a c } v» to Q DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this day of 1985, between TAC, Development Corporation ( "Property Owner" an t e ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California ( "City "), RECITALS This Agreement is predicated upon the following facts; 1, e6yerl ment Code section 65864 - 65895.5 authorizes the City to y enter into bin�lpg development agreements with persous having legal or equitable inter,$-,A in real ;property for the development of such property. 2, Under ;j4 tti 65855-- the City has adopted rules and regulations e a requirements and administrative guidelines ;for c f' deveropment agreements. 3. Propertyy �xner has, )/eiquested Gity to consider entering into a development agree City's rules and'�eguiptns. tent &hd pprro�ceedings have been taken in accordance with 4. City has found that the development agreement is consi &Qnt with the General Plan.. S. On 1985, City adopted Ordinance -, `> approving the eve opmen` agreement with Property Owner and sat action r' was effective on 2985. '1 NOW, TtiElctAAE, the parties hereto agree as follows: F 1. Definition .q. In this kreement, u0ess the context. otherwise } requires, t e o owing terms shalt have the following meaning: a. "City" is the City of Rancho Cucamonga. i b, "Project" is the development approved by City, described further in paragraph 7 hereinbelow, _ter;; c. "Proper owner" Owner" is TAC development Corporation, and includes all of its successors in interest and assigns. i d. "Real property" is the real property referred to in paragraph 3 hereinbelow. e. "Senior Housing Overlay District" is the zoning category created by City Ordinance No. 193 adopted April 20, 1983. f. "Target Tenant" is defined as individuals who are fifty -five (55) years old or older, or, married couples whose head of rr household Is fifty -five (55) years old or older', a _ _ v "g. "Affordable Rents" - Rents charged _,,Will be affordable to individuals or couples earning equal to or -less than eighty percent (80X) of the current County of San Bernardino median income as determined by the Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development, which rent sf,ell on an annualized basis be eq�ll to or less than thirty percent (300 of the eighty percent (80%) of` the current median income. For purposes of this definition,, rents chrged for "all one (1) bedroom units shaT1 be subject to computation based upon eighty percent (80X) of the median income for a two (2) person household. Rents charged for all two (2) bedroom units shall be subject to computation based upon eighty (80X.) of the median in,-ome for all households (4 or more persons;,} 2. Recitals. The reciWs are part of the agreement bej�ween the parties and sha l be enforced and enforceable as any'other prr4ision of this Agreement. 3. Description of Real Property. The real property which is the subject of this Agreed nt is described more fully in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incor orated herein by reference. 4. Interest of ProRerty Owner. Property Owner represents that it has full 'legal title to i e real property, that is has ~till legal right � to enter into this Agreement, that there is no other person or entity which has any other interest in,fee ownership to th., real property, and that all other persons and ei.�itites who may hol� legal or equitable interests in the property agree to be and are boV6d by this Agreement. If there are any holders of deeds of trust on the real property which may be senior to the lien of this Development Agreement, the holders of such deeds of trust have assented to the terms of this Development Agreement in writing and agree to be bound by the provisions hereof. 5. Binding Effect of Agreement. The burdens of this Agreement shall run with the real property and shall bind, and the benefits of this Agreement shall inure to, the successors in interest and assigns of the part"tes to it. 6. >telatonship of Pax ies. It is understood that the contractuat relationship between City and Property Owner is suck -;thet Property Owner is an independent contractor and is not the agent of`tity for any purpose whatsoever. 7. City's Approval Proceedings for Project. an , 19 City approved Ordinance crentint� -,a Senior Housing Over ay District. On 3�� the City adopted a zoning designation of "Senior Housing Overlay District" for the real property. The record of the applications by Property Owner, proceedings before the Planning Commission and the City Council of City on file in the office of City and all of the files, and records in these matters are incorporated herein in full by this reference as though set forth in full. Property Owner proposes to construct 168- apartment units, recreational and common area facilities, and 168 park iMe spaces and other a-.enities on t`e subject property, all as are set forth more fully 4. in the site plan for�,,_pevelopment Review 85 -01 ( "Site Plan ") submitted by r - 2 Property Owner and approved by City, acpp;! of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein by reference. The Site Plan includes various conditions of approval which are not changed, altered or modified by this Development Agreement unless specifically set forth herein, 8. Changes in Project._ No changes modifications, revisions or alteration may be Made in 'the site plan approved on without review and approval by City. 9. Term of _A reement. The term of"th s Agreemept shall commenc;: on the d.,te irst aboveew— RhEten and shall expire twenty'(20) years after the occupancy of the fir tenant in an apartment unit in the;ProjeF, but in no event later than tv�ek -five (25) years after the ,wencement of the term of this Agreement; sL ject to the znnual review described in paragraph 13 hereinbelow. 10. Restrictions on Rental Units. Except as set forth hereinbelnw, all tenants, occupant3, an residents of apartment snits in the Project shall be Target Tenan . Said apartment units shall not be rented, occupied, leased or sub-1 sed to tenants or occupants who are not Target Tenants without the C y's prior written consent, except as set forth below. \ f Person or persons not a Target Tenant may occupy an apartment unit if he occupies the apartment unit with a resident occupant who is a Target Tenant and if any of the following conditions are meta (f,, a. in an emergency, and for so Tong as the stone of emergency exists; b. on a temporary basis, not to exceedt'hree (3) months out_ of any calendar year.;(grandchildren, blood relatives) and c. medical support personnel or private-:nurses for resident occupants ,'who are Target Tenants. 11. Rents and Rent Adjustments. The Property Owner" shall establish and maintain affordable base rents and utility allowances for.----- all apartment up�s subject to the restrictions of paragraph 10 in the Project. For ( e purposes of this provision, rent shall include both the amount that ed for occupancy of an apartment and any tuility allowances if utilities are not separately metered. If utilities are sep rately metered, they will not be considered in the base rent. , In the event that rents are increased, a minimum of sixty, (6>) days'' written potice of any rent increase shall be provided to, -the City and to all affected tenants. _ 3I G�l " a � 12. Maintenance of Apartments as Rentals. During the term hereof and such extensions as may be agreed to, a I apartment units in the - - - -• Project shall remain rental units. No apartment unit in the Project shall be eligible for conversion from rental units to Ondoljrf►tiums townhouses or any other common interest subdivision in which some fee ownership in the apartment unit would be granted to a person or entity other than the property Owner or its permitted successorkor assignee or in „which ownership of the Project would beytransferred to a corporation (KCo -Op'*) or other entity which would a en sell stock or sure oUer cooperative ownership interest to a prospe� ve owner or occupancy of an apartment or dwelling unit, provided that r,�ing herein contained, shall preclude the sale of the entire Project tosingte purchaser other than a Co -Op, rt 13, Shuttle Van Service. The Pro4rty Owner shall provide ,arid mainta,:n a shuttle van to provide residents with access to comm6.ity facilities, shopping, entertainment, and medical services. The shuttle van shall contain a minimum of 12 passenger seats and be primarily available to residents unable to,, drive, or without other means of transportation. The shuttle van service and✓ z driver for the van shall be available at least eight hours per day, seven days _a week. During repair, the Property' Owner shall arrange for equivalent transportation. The van and drivers ball be insured as required by California Vehicle Code�� 14. Cn -Site Manager. A full -time manager shall be provided at all times on the project situ In addition, an Assistant Marrager shall be v , provided 4iuring the shutae van service hours for driving the van ors-= � / managing the project when the full -tige manager is driving the van, 15. Tenant Improvements. Residents shall be p et "personalize” their apartment unit through improvemeat m g,-&r not limited to, paint wallpaper, shelves, hanging plants, pictures, and furniture. Nothing ,:r this secticn shall be deemed to permit structural alterations. 16. Tenant Zortmittee. Residents shall have the right to establish a Committee composed of tenants for the purposE -)of organizing secia3_,_.__ activities and providing cc -ments and suggestions "to the Property Owner regarding the operation and facilities of this project. Nothin3 in this section shall be deemed to restrict the `rights of`�individuals to organize activities and provide oomments to the Property Owner. 17. ""bmission of Materials and Annual Review. a. Prior to the execution hereof, the 'Property Owner shell submit to the City the following informs- ion. (1) An analysis of the cost of the Project including land cost, construction cost, finanting cost, and so forth; (2) Tenant selection procedures which shall detail the methods of that Property Owner shall use to advertise the availability of, apartments in the Project and screening mechanisms that Property Ov, "er intends to use to limit the occupancy of the apartments to the Target Populatjcn:,. b. After occupancy, tke Property Owner shrla,file with City an annual report containing information on the Pro,'- *Oecif ed herein for the preceding calendcr year. Said annual reports shall be filed with the City no later than March 25 following the previous calendar year,. The report shall contain such information as =City may then' require; including, but not linited to: the fallowing: (a) rent schedules then in effect, utility charges (if any); (2) project occupaney�- profile including age,` income characteristics of residents, number of automobiles owiked lay Project residents (total); -. (3) listing of substantial physical defects in the Project including a description of any repair or maintenance work undertaken in the reporting year; and (4) a= description of ma7�tenance cif the Project including the condition of apartmant units, 1-ndscaping, walkways, stairs, and recreational areas. (5) a .description of all complaints or suggestions from Jai residents regarding the operation or facilities of this project, �d including the Property Owner`s response. City shall be - allowed to conduct annual physical inspections of the Project as it shall deem necessary provided that said inspections do not unreasona_llt interfere with the normal operations of the Project. The City shall further be allowed to conduct an annual survey of residents in the Project in order to assess their sat ;sfaction with the Project. The survey may contain, but shall not nece sarily be limited to, questions regarding managementitenant relations, maintenance,,•-. - of the Project, design features, general attitude toward the Project,,, and so forth. 18. Tenant Selection Contracts and Rules and Regulations. On receipt of an application for occupai,y, Property Owner shall determine,, the eligibility of the occupancy under the terms of this Development Agreement. Property Owner shall be entitled to relay on the<information contained in the application sworn to by the applicant. All agreements for rental of all apartment units in the Project shall be it writing. The proposed rental agreement or tease form shall be provided to City for its review and approval. Such rules o'= cotduct and occupancy shall be given to each tenant of an apartment unit prior to such tenants'° occupancy. 19. Termination and Eviction of Tenants. A tenancy may be terminated._F;Ythout the term nation b' e-ng , ed eme,i an eviction under the following circumstances: t' ;5 a 11 a. _ death of the sole tenant of the unit; b. by the tenant at the expiration of a term of, occupancy or otherwise, upon thirty (30) days written not(ce; C. by abandonment of the prem7�4s txy the t'enan_ or ,1 d. by- failure '0 utenant; tb maintain income eligibility pursuant to the provisions horeof, p;aviding ttiat Property atner. gives tenant sixty (60) days vlritten notie,o of such termination, or e. by failure of .tenant to eaecu,e or renew a Tease. Any termination of a tenancy other than- those listed in this subparagr - °ph shall constitute an eviction. Property Owner shall only evict in compliance with the provisions of California law and-then only for material non-compliance with the ttet -ms of #e rental agreement, lease or rules and regulations of the Project. Property Owner shall establish appear and/or gfleva:�ce pr3cedures and rules and regulations for use for evictions_ of tenants Which shall be submitted to and approved by the City prior to the occupancy of any Unit in the - Project. The rules and regulations, a Copy of wh'ch_Js attached hereto as Exhibit "C ", is hereby approved. 20. Local Residency. Preferen4 shall be to applicants to the Pr' o�t who hake been residents of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This factor; however, shall not be given any prioritli)Cyer the other elements of tenant selection in paragraph 14, hereof. 21. Hazard Insurance. (� Property Owner shall keep the Project and all improvements thereof, insured at all times against loss or damage by fire or othei, risks covered by a standard extended- ^uerage endorsement and such other risks, perils cr coverage as Property Ownor may determine. During, the term hereof, the Project shall be insured to its full insurable value. City shall have they =flight to, review insurance: coverage maintained by Property Owner or its succe'rs and assigns and the power to require additional insurance to be c)trried in amounts require -d by the City at the City's sold discretion so that th provisions of this paragraph are compli -�4 with. City's action or inaction hereunder shall not subject it to liability to any third persons or entities. 22. Maintenance Gt:aranty. In order to insure that maintenance of the project is performed in accordance with the maintenance ,plan as outlined in the Senior Housing Overlay District administrative guidelines and in this Development ARreement, Property OwneF,'shall post a maintenance deposit or -owner legal securtyy reasonably acceptable to the City to be used by the City in the eve "w that Property Owner shall fail ti) adequately maintain the Project as herein required. The parties ' hereto agree that a maintenance deposit may +"be in the form of.a- letter of credit; certificate of deposit, bond or comparable instrument, l : 4T. 23, Specific Restrictions on Development of Real Pron4rty. The following specific restrictions shall also cover the use of the real - property: a. only residential uses of the real property are permitted in the Project. b. maximum "density of .residential dwelling .units `'if the Project shall Bever be. greater than '35,36 dwelling units per acre. c the maximum height for each of the proposed buildings shall be 55 feat. -d, maximum size for all `of the buildings and the proposed square footage for each of the apartment types 1Gcated therein is set . forth more 'fully on Exhibit 113" attached hereto and incorported herein by reference. e. provisions for' reservation or, dedication of land for public purposes are contained- in` the cc,naltions' for approval of Development Review 85 -01 and,are i'ncorporateJ herein by this`reference. 24. Held Harmless.. ;Property Owner agrees,ta� and shall hold City,,'r' its officers, agents, employees and . representatives harmless, frv'; liability for damage or claims for damage for personal injury including death and claims for property_ damage which may arise from the d -irect or - indirect operations of Property Owner or those of his contractor, subcontractor, agent, employee or othev person acting °on' his behalf which relate to the Project. Property Owner agrees to and shall defend City and its officers, agents, employees and 'representatives from actions for damages caused or alleged to have been caused by reason of Property Owner's activities in connection with the Project. This hold - harm ess agreemen� applies to all damages and claims for damage suffered or a3'_k?ged to have been suffered by reason of the op'L�ations referred to in this Development Agreemert regardless of whether or not 'the City prepared, supplied, or approved the' plans, 'specifications or =other documents for the Project. 25. Affect of Development Agreement on Land Use Regulations. ' u Rules, regu ations, and official policies governing permltte! uses of the real property, the density of the real property, the des -9n, improvement and construction standards and specifications applicab f,.'�o development of the real property, are those rules, regulations and official policies in force at the time of execution of this agreement. \ It is understood that City may grant Property Owner a dwelling unit ; bonus, may waive its requirements for Ldvered on -site parking and may reduce and /or waive other fees _as an incentive for Pfnp €rty --Dwner to construct.'- the 'Project 3nd' >for both parties to enter into this Development Agreement, 26., Development Incenti-;es. Pursuant to paragraph 25 of the Development Agreement, the City will grant property owner, the following development incentives for development on the subject property: a 7 v - a. The Beautification ion Fee levied pursuant to City Council Resolr ion79�1, Section 7.0,-will be waived in"its entirety. b. The School Impaction Fees levied pursuant to City Council Ordinance 30, as amended, will be waived in their entirety. c, the maximum density per acre on the subject property -shall be incrPl9ed to 35.36 dwelling units per acre. d. The maximum number of required off street parking spacQs shall be lowered to one (1) paylcinr space per dwelling unit. e. The requirement for covered parking'spaces will be waived t, its entirety: f. Payment of both the Drainage Fee and Systems Development Fee by the property, owner will be deferred and will 'be payable concurrently with the occupanry of the first unit on the subject property. ; The fees will be based upon the Ordinances and schedules in effect as of the date of submittal of the project and will not be effected or increased by any increases taking effect after submittal of the project. -"Date of subiwittai" of the project will mean the time that plans are submitted to the City in order to Nava the City issue building permits for "construction of the improvements on the subject property. 27. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended or cancelled„ in whole or in part ogly by mutual written co6sent of the parties and then in the manner provided for in Government rode sections 65868 et seq. This Development Agreement does not prevent City in subsequent actions applicable to the real property from applying new rules„ regulations and policies applicable to the property a5 set forth in paragraph 8 hereinabove. This Development Agreement does not prevent City from denying or, conditionally approving any subsequant development project _ application on the basis of existing or -new rules, regulations or policies. 18.; Enforcement. In the :event of a default under the provisions of this Agreement by Property Owner, City shall give written notice toq -.,- F Property Owner (or its successor) at the Project, or by registered or certified mail addressed'to Property Owner at the address stated in the Agreement, or to such violation is not corrected to the reasonable satisfaction of City within ninety (90) days after such notice is given, or if not correction within such reasonable time as may be required to cure the breach or default if said breach or default cannot be cured within ninety (90) days (provided that acts to cure the breach or default must be commenced within` said ninety (90) days, and must thereafter be delinquently pursued by Owner) then the City may, without further notice, declare a ,default under this Agreement and, upon any such declaration of defat1 t; the City may bring any action_necess�ry tc.> enforce tite obligations of Property Owner growing out of the operation of this Development Agreement, apply to any court, state or federalr''for specific injunction against any violation by Property Owner of. any pravision of this Agreem7!7�:, or for such other relief as may be appropriate%, "it being a:,�Q "by Property Owner that the injury to City arising from default under any of the terms of- thin' Development 8. Agreement would be irreparable and that It would be extremely difficult to ascertain., the amount' of compensati�r to City td-' afford adequate relief in light of the purposes and policies advanced and satisfied by �L- approval.of the Project and by this Development Agreement. 29. Event of Default. Property Owner is in default under this Agreement upon the happening of one or more of the Billowing eveni�J or condition,; a, if a warranty, representation or statement made or furnished by Property Owner, to City is false or proves to have been false in any material respect when it was made; b. if a finding and determination is made ;by. the City following an annual review pursuant to paragraph 13 hereinabove upon the basis of substantial evidence that Property Owner has not complied in good faith with any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, after notice and,opportunity to cute as described in Paragraph 2$ hareinabove;' c. bread: by Property Owner, of any of the provisipns or terms of this Agreement, after notice and opportunity to cure as provided in Paragraph 28 hereinabove 30. Proceeding Upon Default. City does not. , waive any claim of defect in performance- by Fraperty if on periodic review City does,, not modify or terminate this Agreement. Nonperformance by Propertj'. j Owrier shall ,not be excused because of performance by Property Owner of the obiigatlons herein contained Would be 6 r- ofitable, difficult or expensive or because of,, a faiivr-- of any ,third• =party or entity, other than the City. All other remedies at law, or in equity which are not otherwise provided' for. in this Agreement, or U the City's regulations governing development agreements are available to the.parties to pursue in the event that there is a,breach of this Development Agreement. No waiver by City of any breach or default under this Development Agreement shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other +yr subsequevri treach thereof or default hereunder. ; 31. Rights of Lenders tinder this kreement; Sbouid F, opa ty Qwner place or cause to be placed any encumbranp,6 or liett,lon the P •• roject, or - any part thereof, the benefariary ( "lender ") of said encumbrance or lien, including, but not limited to mortgages shall have the right at >' j any time during the term of this Agreement and,the existence of said' encumbrance or lien to: i a. do any act or thing required of Property Owner under this Agreement, and any such act or thing done and performed by Lender shall. be as effective as if done by Property Owner himself; = b. realize on the security afforded by the encumbrance or lien by exercising foreclosure proceedings or power of sale or &,-her remedy afforded in [raw or in equity or by the sectirtty &cumert y -` ,videncing the encumbrance or lien (herein called the "trust Deed "), and ', 9 (1) transfer, convey or .,��'n 06 title of Property Owner to the Project to any purchaser at_ any foreclosure 'sale, whether the foreclosure sale be conducted pursuant to court order or pursuant tc a power of sale contained in the Trust Deed; (Z) acquire and succeed to the interest,of Property Owner by virtue of any foreclosure sale, whether the foreclosure sale be, conducted" pursuant to a court order or �;luant to a power of, sale � contained in toe 'trust Deed. 32. Notts to Lender. City under this Agreement shall ,give written notice of any default �r' breach finder this Agreement by Property Owner to Lender and afford tender the opportunity after service of the notice to. a. cire the breach or default within thirty (30) days after service of said notice, where the default can be cured by the payment of money; 4, b. csre the breach of default within ninety (90) days after service of said notice -where the breach or default can be, cured by something other than the payment of money.and can b±e cured within that time, or c. cure the breach or de €ault in,such reasonable time as tray be required where something other than monk--t is required' to cure the br.aach or default aid cannot be performed within ninety (90) days after said notice, provided that acts to cure the breach or default are t commenced w9thi inety (90) day period after-service of said notice of default on by City and are thereafter diligently continued by Lender. 33. ;Action by Lender. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, a Lender may forestall any action by City fora breach or default under the terms of this Agreement by 'Property' Owner by commencind proceedings to foreclose its encumbrance or lien 'on the Project. The proceedings so commenced may be for foreclosure of the encumbrance by order ,of court or for foreclosure of the encumbrance under a power of sale contained in fire instrument ,creating thg- -, . encumbrance or lien. The proceedings shall not, however, forestall any such action by the City for the default or breach by Property Owner unless: a. they are commenced withili iffy (30) days after service on Lender of the notice described bereinabove b. they are, after having been comm%,iced, diligently pursued in the manner required by law to completion; and c. Lender keeps and performs all of the terms, covenants and conditions of the Agreement requiring the payment; or expenditure of money by Property Owner until the foreclosure proceedings are complete or are discharged by redemption, satisfaction`, or payment. 10 . 34. Liability of Lender. No Lender shall have any liabiltity under the terms of_.this Agreement unless it acg0res title to thag.,Project through foreclosure or a deed 'in lieu of foreclosure in which event, is Ap shall hold title to the Project subject to the, o ligatians of a successor to the Property Owner as herein provided. `- 35. Rent Control. in consideration for the limitatians herein 4 provided, the City agrees that it shall,,;; %during the term of /phis Agreement, not take any action, the effepi of which will be control, determine, affect the rents for apartmenj,,,'units located in the Project; the parties herein agree that the cogtror or limitation of rents on the remainder of the apartment units irf44 roject. f 36. Attorney's FeesU' in any pjroceedings 'arising, from the enforcement of this Aevte1 pment Agreement or because of an alleged breach or default hereundei the prevalling,,party shell be entitled to recover the costs and attori ey fees incurred in the proceeding and such reasonable ` torneys' feesAs may be determined by a Court in any legal " action. / r 37. Cumulative R°t�6edies. The respective rights and remedies provided by this Deve opm'ent Agreement or by law or available in equity shall be cumulative and the exercise of any one or more of suchryights or remedies shall not precludes °or affect the exercise, at the same or at different times, --of ant, other such rights or remedies for the same or different defaults- or eaches or for the same or - different failures to perfgrm or observt, any germ or provision of this Agreement. 38. Binding Effect. This-Agreement shell bind, and the benefits and burdens hereof she :;inure to, the...;respeq" ,1v+e parties hereto, their legal representatives,;'�Executives, - admthis.;?ators, successors and assigns, provided however, .that if Property Owner sells the project and the purchaser rssumes Property Owner's obligations hereunder accruing after said'sale'then Property Owner shall have no obligations hey >under after said sale is consummated. 39. Recordation. This Agreement shall, at" the expense of Property owner, be recorded' in this official records of the County of 'San Bernardino in accordancejwit4 provisions of the Governm�lt Code. 40. Miscellaneous. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance +pit id governed by the Taws of the State of California, The `provisions Uf this Development Agreement shall be liberally Il construed to .effect its purpose as set forth' herein and in the attachments hereto. Whenever the context .so requires, the singular number, includes the plDral, the plural includes the singular, masculine gender includes the` "feminine an,'for neuter and the neuter. gender includes the masculine and /or feml6ine. The tir., limits set forth in this Agreement may be extended, by mutual consent of the parties in accordance with the procedures for ado }ion of a deialopment agreement. &'' lI iR and acknowledged to me tat a corporation execute it. I 1 € NOTARY PUBLIC ' 4 41. Partial Invalidity. If any provisions of this AgreementI'shalI be invaTid,,— -i I le a r unenforceable, the vapidity, legaliiy or r r if t be affected or impaired thereby. ft I IN WIT ESS WHEREOF, this A�reement has been executed'�by the parties and shall Tbe effective on the day: aad year first above written regardless?gf the date of actual execut�jn hereof. PROPERTY OWNER: :. BY_- G,� -VELOPMENT CORPORATION BY. . f: N Name - C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA J BY: BY: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) _ ^ ° C COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Ss. On 79_ _, before me the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State personally appeared and proved to me on the,-basis-of the,—basis—of satisfactory evidence to be the persons who Executed this instrument es Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Rancho C,Yi, amonga, a municipal corporation existing and organized under the laws 6 the State of California, and acknowledged to me i at the City of Rancho Cucamonga executed it. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF CALIFORNIA ss. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARMNO ) On 19 ,: before me the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said o my and State personally appeared and proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evi ence to be the persons w o executed this instrument as and an behalf o 7 r3 - • , r' All that ceitain 4eai,`prngerty located sh the 'County of San Bernardino, S£ate of Californij described as follows_ j A portion of the Bas; 1/7 . of Lot 12, Block 11, Cucamonga HoTnestead ASSOCiatioT4' a as per plat recorded in Moak b *f Maps, page. 46, records of said Coi:nty. described as follows: 330 north of the s 4�heast Commencing at a golf t 27S fleet west and raez lot thence- 'north 66 :feet; thence f'-st parallel with the, corner of sail "feet east line`= cf'said lQt i5erce - South, line of said ot., 275 to the north along the a t =xine Of 'S r lot to the north iiile of said lo'; 'line xh -:nce west alW the north line of's id lot to the west; Of the -east 1/2 of said lot, thence south alc g ':e west line of said east 1/2 \� of - % lot 12 to a point 330 °feet :north of the south line of said lot; the ^e . east parallel; witl: the south line-of =_aid lo= to the point of beci mine. { k J [ � J Y tea• i 3 17, (SITE PLANI (Detail of apartment size and size �pf all buil�iiagsj Am EXHIBIT 'C' `- GR /I�EVANC FROCEDUR 1. RIGHT =A HEARING Upon filing of a written request as ,provided herein, a complainant shall be eD.titled to a 'hearing before the Hearing Panel. }: 2. DEFINITIONS i a. �= is used meaning owner or his. Authorit, Agent... S�. b. Loom lainant is defined as any resident whose rights, duties,, welfare or status are or may be adversely affected by Owner's action or failure to act and who files a grievance or' complaint with the Owner with respect to such action or failure to act. C. City as used herein shall mean '.:she City of Rancho Cucamonga. d• SaZie_y Dx fsm&laint is defined as any dispu'.e with respect to Owner's action or failure to act in accordance with; lease requirements, or any„ Owner's action or failure to act: involving interpretation or application of the Owner's Fegulations, policies or procedures which affects the rights, duties, welfare or status of the complainant. 3. F2OCE2= PRIOR MQ A ?S a. Any grievance DZ complaint: must! be parsanai,� 2 e - i:; to the Owner's office off. to the management office of the project in which the complainant resides sorthat the grievance may be infcrmaliy discussed and',_sett3 without a hearing. The grievance or complaint r j}st be signed by the complainant and filed in the offigY by him or his representative within S days of the Owner's action or failj7 -re to act which is the basis for the grievance. It ' , 17 be siktpii stated, but shall specili (1) the partscutar ground i s) upon which it s based, and (2) the action requested. _ .r A copy of the complaint shall be= retained by the complainant and a copy should be filed with the project manager. All complaints and /or copies must be date- stamped at time of raceipt by the Owner. b. 'An answer In yr,Z,tlng 12 azah complaint, dated and signed by the project manager, or other appropriate official, shall be delivered or mailed to the complainant within a reasonable time (generally within ten working days?. A ! copy of the answer shall be filed with the complaint in °R the appropriate _project office. The answer shall specify:, .__- 1. The proposed disposition of the complaint and the specific reasons therefore; 2. The right of the complainant to a hearing; and 3. The procedure by which a bl aring may be obtained.' C. 1 ce+mnlain3n - 3; ca ; �,id with the proposed disposition of his complaint, 4� stated in the project manager's or other Owner off s "cialIs answer, he may, submit a written request, t the Owner or project manage meet off4te, for a hear' g. This written request-- shal f� Oe mad!` within a reasonable time of the date of the answer "to his )complaint (generally ten working days). The written request for a hearing must be date - stamped and filed in the appropriate Owner or project management office along with the complaint &nd answer. The Searing Panel shall be a wised promptly of the request by the appropriate official; shall scheduy1� the hearing as promptly' as possible for a date, V:.a and place r' easonably convenient to the camp 1aina3it+� and shall inform the complainant thereof iti vri*ng. d. it comglainant does not a, c - wi ' the .$!taring time period allowed in St:b,�ection c. above, he'waives his right to the. hearing, azld <t%e Owner's proposed disposition, of the grievance will become final. 4. COMPOSITION MD M- ZEARM IRASEL_ The hearing Panel shall consist of five members, two selected from a list of tenants; two appointed by the Owners and one impartial and disinterested member (together with an alternate) chosen by the Hearing Panel members. In the ev, -ant that the four Hearing Panel members cannot agree on t�,e fifth impartial member, then such fifth member shall -be appointed by the.- . -- »- City. The Chairman of the Hearing Panel shall be elected by j the members of the Panel. Three votes shall be required for any decision`by the Panel. a. Sb2 a .9-ba2.1 ha ,nc Ls3,atiNue Q1 hhm came ainant_.on the Paned which hears his complaint; nor s }all any "-officer or employee whose duties and responsirilties involve him in anyway with the grievance at issue, sit as a member 'of the Bearing Panel for that particular hearing. 5. HEARING ab the V=U PM ill he ent .tlgd =.a .fr_U hearing before the Hearing Panel and may be represented by counsel or anoLltei person chosen as a representative. �✓" b. 2he heazina , shall bA px vat 7 Y C. If .th.e dispute a as-gm _U= ,amount of rent or other charges which the Owner claims is due, the complainant shall deposit the ^asmount'in dispute in an escrow account ^T pending settlemenj of the dispute by the -Hearing Panel. If the complairant fails to do so, it shall be determined that the complainant has waived his right to the Hearing, d. If dSS21Djt�lnan fsZi.lSes? aa-�ti --ear d aari.r,d, the panel may postpone the Hearing, for five working days, orcmay make a determination that the complainant/ has waived his right to the Heargg. e.. Bt Jhe hearing ±J10 burae jaf V aQ !eon the complainant li to prove his case. The complainant ;ray present evidence and arguments in support of. his coz,tplaint. The Owner may confront and cross - examine allImitnesses on whose testimony or information the complaint relies. Hearings _ conducted by the Hearin g Panel shall be informal, and any oral or documentary evidence, shall be limited however to the facts and issues raised by the complaint and answer, must be received by the Hearing Panel with .regard to whether that �;yidenoe would be admissable i,�der_rules of evidence employed in judicial proceedings. 6. }DECISION= SSE = IiEARI PANE a. The Aeci si on 9f 12m aearinQ Zan a shall be based sol;ply and exclusively upon facts presented at the hearing. ;Tor the extent what the decision is not inconsistent with State laws and to' the extent 'provided in Subsection c. below, tsae decision of the Hearing Panel shall be binding on the Owner and Complainant. �r b. `.1 J= JJeAz1= Panel X1.1 nrenare Stiff written degislon, including a .statement of findings and conclusians; as well as the reasons or basis therefor, upon all material issues raised by the ,parties. This shall be done within a reasonable time after the date of the hearing. , Copies thereof shall, be mailed or delivered to the parties r and /or their representatives. C. U I¢ de +ai On Is 171 fame 3:f . = is'.4mvitai. s`�'., the" Owner shall within a reasonable time take all actions necessary to carry out such decision or refrain from any ;,1, ` action prohibited by such decision unless the Owner's counsel determines and notifies the complainant in writing within 30 days that the Hearing Panel has acted arbiLxariiy or exceeded its authority. In such event, c the Hearinc}i�J�}}tfP�anneel'sT,, 6-- may be judicially reviewed. �icision 7. ZNQTICL . .t/4 'VA.Ci]T r��vALiA %8iJ2 a. .0 Jjli_� Tenant bAS request e a ImAzing on the proposed r= 3J�.�:. i, eviction and the Hearing Panel by its decision upholds the Owners or project management's proposal to evict, an actioa to „regain possession` may not be commenced until after the Tenant's right to use and /or occupy the premises has, :Ieen terminated by lawful notice. Such notice to vacWte may not be given prior to the date on which the Hearing Panel's. decision upholding the proposed- eviction is delivered or mailed to the Tenant. b. When sue notice 12 Stacate ja given = tj= 41enant, he must be informed'in writing that; (1) I£ he fails to quit the premises within three days, appropriate legal action (dependent on state law) will bs brought against him (2) If suit is brought against, him, he may be required to,pay Court costs and attorney fees incurred. i r 1� V'- -z9 t; RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY n OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHb CUCAMONGA AND TAC DEVELOPMENT COMPANY,. IN ,1 RELATION TO THE PROPERTY GEKcMLLY LOCATED ON THE 1 WEST SIDE OF AMETHYST, NORTH OF. 19TH STREET. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, following a duly held public hearing is recommending approval of thn:Developmenf Agreement on said property to the City Council; and PA ",REAS, the Planning Commission, following a duly held public hearing has approved Development Review 85-01 for the property; and WHEREAS, it has been d &ermined that the development of the property in accordance with the, Senior 3;c Ong Overlay District would<be beneficial to the public purposes of the City, im-�that the property, developed in a manner authorized by the development approvals Mould be ,consistent with the City's General Man; and WHEREAS, the implementation of said development in accordance with the Senior Housing Overlay District required a Development Agreement (which is by reference inpr,�oraited herein). NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City o,'`� ho Cucamonga does hereby resolve to recommend to the City Council approv 1 of the attached Development Agreement. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 21TH -DAY OF MARCH, 2985. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA !i BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST- Rick Gomez, Deputy SecrFtary LI i ��° Planning Commission k.sdlution TAQ DeVelopment Page, 42 1, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the f'oregoing Resolution was duly;'and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted' by the- - Planning»Apmmission, of the City of Rancho Cueamonga,,,at a regular meeting of,the(Planning Commission held on the 27th day of March, 1985, iky the fe,Iowiny vote -to -wit; AYES.— COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ' ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS; t j1 I \ k ° C&4-" OF RANCHO, CIUCAMOXG-k r-:, I� A 'p FF EPOR ~, STA R 5A4 i - L Z U Y DATE: March 27, 1985, 1 4 TO: Chairman and Mpbers =of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez,, City Planner ' BY: Nance Fong, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMEATAU.:ASSESSMbiT AND CONDITIO14AL USE PERMIT 85 -01 _ Z' ANTER - T►e deve Qprttient _of a 4, 0 square foot retail shop�sing center: on 5.1 acres of land in the Geriral Commercial District located at the, northeast corcker of Foothill Boulevard am +.;Ramona Avenue - APN 1077- 01 -24, 30, 33.: I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of site --plan, elevations and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Purpose: Construction of a 45,000 square foot retail shopping .enter, C. Location: Northeast corner of ,Foothill and Ramona. F D. Parcel Size: 5.1 acres.; E. Existing Zoning: General Commercial Sistric ' F. Existing Land Use :` Vacant -` G. Surrounding Land Use and Zonin : North - Apartments, singe family; Medium,,Resident l al 3.,1 District, Law`'Residential District. South - Mobile home park, va,ant; General Commercial District. East - Commercial; General'`Commereial. West - Gas station, single family; General Co�'ercial, Low Residential District. General Plan Designations: Project Site - General Commercial North Medium Residential, 844,du /ac, Law gesidential', 2 -4 j,du /ac.., South - Gen(fral CemmRnpial East - General Cona6kial, Low Residential, 2 -4 du /acs. West - General Comercial, low Residential, 2-4 du /ac' o PL.ANNINO COWA',SIO 'STAFF REPORT Conditional Use Permit BS -OI - Ka6ter March 27, 1985. -� _rage � 2 ;t I. Site Characteristics.; 'Subject site is vacant' and v-el'atia�ly 1e el getation consists of weeds, and shrubs. Sloth of the subject site is a new apartment complex_that. h 1 garages abutting the site's northerly boundary. 11 II. ANALYSIS' A. General: The propped shopping center is oriented in an 5haape than intery,,Ior Jrsvewey. loop for truck /dpiivery service use w,d employee' parking. Major parking area frmits on Foothif', Boulevard. Plaza areas have been provided to encourage , pedestrian �taffic. T ±e proposed mission architectural theme features texturize4 stucco, missian tile, and colonades. S. a resign `Review Cosm�ittee. has Design Review Committee- '£h recommended approval the project provi�4 ti;e following improvements be made which the developer t�� „= ayreed'toz 1. Continue the same roofline of the, west elevation around the northt,elevation, 2. Provide heavy posts for the;colonades and the eaves support. C. Environmental - Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has`6ea completed by applicantb Staff has completed Part 11, of the Environmental Checklist and found no significant impacts ontht environment as a result of this project. A copy of P,ar _It of the ;Environmental Checklist is attached for your rev' v and consideration. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code. The project will not be detrimental to the adjacent properties or, cause significant environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed site plan and building designs, together with the recommended Conditions of Approval, are in compliance with all -applicable City Standards. '. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Daily Report newspaper, the Property posted, and natives sent to all property owners within300 feet of the project site. , To datp,no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. AOL a w .A PLANPING COMMISSIOH•STAFF REPORT ` Condytionai UseriPermit 85 -01 - Kanter _March 274 1985 I Page 3 t V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission -issue a Negativclaration and approve Permit Conditional Use Pe 85- 01 by adoption, of the attached Resolution with Conditi\ns of . iApprovalR` t R ctfuj!ly „submitte, ' 1 city Fanner t RG.NF os,f' r r. „ [Attachments: Exhibit 'A” - Location anc�Land 1i i 1� Y Exhibit 1184 -Site Utilization E;p'aibit° "Cw' 1Site Pla► Exhibit "il" 'p Conceptual Grading Exhibit "E" > Conceptual Landscape Exhibit, "F" Plaza Areas ;z Exhibit "G'* - Elevations (5) Exhibit. "H11 - Roof Plai Exhibit "I" - Lighting Plane Ie.Zial Study,, Part. -Ii Resolution of Approval With Conditions t +L+ 1 >(1 it t OR } Fc Is TH �. GC _ i� ,% NTH l( CITY OF rrvi. RANCM C v(OtG �mE: Ems° 1 uff�ffnfnfrp �` �� ■ � 7774 � +� .mss• a fiADAIR . ......` t OR } Fc Is TH �. GC _ i� ,% NTH l( CITY OF rrvi. RANCM C v(OtG �mE: Ems° f C:) �. C:) C Ie .. TSB"` , - �3'pf"=.a'W..:�'. - *. -m; I� '•C�:`.�t. SITE_ U7ILIZAYION_MLkP_,n .—+ li CITE' OF yy i RATCM ii ONGA TTY L.Ls. 40-4 % i i PLANNING' DI OON EXHILdi'i' SCALE �'' L 11 E` YlN00lI1rJ 14 r -NIOOJ m 0565 1`� �,�'� OAVi TnH10U1M OS66 aa��Nt� AdlNnoo g:.: f VDNOWVt5nO OHONVH 53SYiJO5SV Y32NY7L i$Y9 . r � t x 4k t t" cn o r-� F � o r •° O� t x 4k t t" cn o r-� 511, 1ft �- Qs tt i h tqy jIt �. r gg tlr]'yh{ \e �,,.• sq 51 i t�iFfl:!l IS1Y�6d8dirnia f1&I �� ►e� -- •-..sw�+..yitw �d; , a: = C �::�II:.2.aj87 � ?.t73ia ::i +ea2�a2:LIS1�R��CC+ o S �ti lit R INN g�l1j] t } hat e IN Al i{ . � � f � it ;�• � ' ;t R �� S '� ow La t 1D .'Q1% �4 'fib O glut f jSI lit e\ t • - °' r a1� { • {ts : R � � � � s f3 i ' t ; ..� �, .�3nr�r � - �.�.... = .rFro�sv�ls•l += z<•;�"��, �'� 1l i St + i 'r F CC rip 4 'a Vf t t j " 7 oaa- St + i 'r F CC rip 4 'a Vf t oaa- -zl ti a Ne ewuezwv. {t:1YAMd1F, .lEuN(it7'.' lt� G st�osn. u�ae�v.E.. ki�Nbk! ( f r: I L^ HT It le tA , Fa WHO . Si.Sr� vlYWid K .tIG.1 \ Y� ...'. w. � Dig L-L CSdut7l�l'�e1 'AklaK;e�0:3 l f >QL YC6Y �1 39t3...>V ..:�jJi`1y 11tY:Y� . C 3 rYi+rV�(i� Oi33f�b+kl y SFr — II Cr c�—;, � -�•- fit::_ � y'J .� � ri �� _ —.. _-..+. Via– � 1• i -�� / �1 ' as e.p ' 10 o t 0 1 � y if ' v a .wrr::C ..rte • , 401Am -- — --_-= � �j —1,4 ass ILK if ' v a .wrr::C ass ILK X41 t 1 s�J d �.R Y it ie fi t� �4 n t a �` � twn = • QiiVl iiA .tail .no � I i+.v wau - - .� ' M.xsi \0,.%v n3 OHONVII Q O p ;? p O E o it ° L ; w r ij , {�(I r o ' � �t1Vd'MR�tAt3ltvl10� - --µ_� •�,? t � ,� E ETo t t2Ci-.V n O a T e S 9 lk >'•' } 51 t,..t 1 c .. r O7O ZO NN Yf W i�NpD U ` ff - �Oyn7v7y �� 9.N.v170+t1 94 O � , VJNOVIn -, t m J ti \ �... �. f :ct7: X11 � _ �• , i ja- 9 7 PDA oq ul jj x( r•NM}fl'{:�'1JNpr17�:i7 OM31cYH "Wli) 17N {h Q3 'At OS6B ^•��' '�� /�„� Lt i 1 w. + aarA��n x�.Nnoo = s3.zvr�oes •�zrnnc �cvo � ' 'F F � Nr�d = iri/�gfi - v�xt;ivv�na b't,'�NVC� ,• :ct7: X11 � _ �• , i ja- 9 7 PDA oq ul jj x( 1I tin -0P W -ICHO CUCa 40-tiOA PART II - INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL C!1- 1MIST -f rJ DATE': 3 r APPLZCA2TT: A {"" b-24 S3- LOG NUMBER --- PROJECT: Sslevse../ ----(� PROJECT LOCATION: Ain zy�rni.4 Cl}��(371lA#� � I t =oar- a..,_,g S 3 ®, 3A" t x. ENVIR6` S L FIVACTS, . _, 1 `\ " (Explanation ok all "yesi° and "maybe" answers are requ�,red on attached sheets). r YES XkYB9 NO Coils and Gealozv. Will the proposal have �4 significant results in: a. 'Unstable ground cond#llons ar in changes in Feologic relat'"nnshIA? r b• Disruptions, displacements, compaction or " burial of the, soil? ? C. ;Change in'topography`u�. ground surface contour intervals? _ d. The destruction, cpverin or 1 g modification ,of any uni;ue geologic or physical featves? . e• Any potcntial,Ancteaae in wind or water erpsion of se.zic, affecting- eikhet on or off =' sit6 Onditci.3, ?`I f. ,:Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? { g. Exposure of people or property "to geologic hazards as earthquakes, landslides, scud - aiides groutid failjure, or'similar hazards? h. An increase in the rate of extraction and/or 'use " of any mineral jesource? L , y:iil:;ti.a proposal h ;� significant results inM * —17 1 t F P, t " Page 2 t YES .`rAYBE ti0 i a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of flowing streams, ^! rivers, or ephemeral stream channels? b. Changes in absorption rate drainage or the rate and amount of Surfaea water runoff? runoff? c. Alterations tithe course �r flaw of flood seaters? V d. Change In the amount of srFace water in any body of water? V e. Discharge into surface wafirS, or any alteration of surface orate qualify, a f. r Alteration Of .groundwater charaeteristicd? g- Change in the gsantity of groundwaters, I either through direct additions or ;with - drawals; or through`'nterference with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity ?' rr++ h. The reduction in, the amount of wet r Other- wise available for public rater supplies? ~J l 3. Exposure of people or propert;+ to 'Y ater related Gzards such as flooding or seiches ?, / f 3. Air Quality Will the .propos4 have significt:int, results in a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile or indirect sources? Stationa*y sources? - f 1.�. b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and/or Interference with the attainment of applicable air quality s:Iandards? C. Alteration of local or regional climatic f conditions, affoeting air zovement. moisture or temperature? ti 4. Biota --.Y _ Flcra. Will the proposal have significant results :1 ins r� a. Change in the caaracteri --tics of species, Including diversity, distribution„ �� -- or number of an species p Y , p s o£ /ants? I b, Deduction of the rumbers of any. unique, rare or endangered species of plants. t ?age 3 h; i. YES 'L_ BE No _ c. ,..Introduction of new or disruptive: species, of ., plants into an area? d. Reducti� in the potential for 0 griculturxl ,• production? Fauna. Will the Proposal have significant results`'` In: a. Change Iii the characteristics of species, includin$ diversity, distribution, OVI,rum'beis of any species of animals? b. Reduction if the numbers of5_any tMi4ue', rare or endangered species of anynals:? ti, c, 'Introduction of new or disruptive species of animal$, into an area, or result in.,a barrier, La the migration or movement of anmals Deterioration at removal of existinF- fish or wildlife habitat ?_ v< S. Ponul at o irn ___ -- $i'i72 the proposal hatiie significant results inr _ a. Will the proposal allter tbe loeation, disltri- bution, density, diversity, Or growth rate of the human population of an airt? �r r b. Will the proposal affect ex£stiig housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 6. Socin?-Ecorosaic Factors, Will the i 8ave ,praposa; g—a ricant results in: a. Change is local or regional ; sotto- •economic characteristics, irciuding '- }conomic sr , commercial diversity, taas� rate, and property values ? - c b. Will project costs be equitably distributed o.. among project bensfitiaries, i.e., buyers,. f tax payars or project users? � 6/ 7. rand Use and Flanniae Cansxf�erations. Wi11 the proposal have signii ficant results in? a. A substantial alteration of the present or % ~' planned land•use of an area? �. b. A cunflirt with any designations, obiectives, °`ies, ,. poli or_ adopted plans bf any gavernmentaf eat ��-- �.z c. An imaact Capon the g4a$ty or quanti;y of �� - x£ating Consumptive at 7.'ldFt°' gII15CsFilgC`l:VE- p � rpertAriona-1 opportunities? _. Page 4 lI YES la NO $. TransnortaCioir. Will the Propos.A have significant- {: results in:` s «' Generation of substantial additional vehicular, siave�aznt�? b. Effects on existing stveet�, o " Iemand £or, new strut construction? . V c. iffeuts,ori existing, parkin$ facilities, err yl demand foz newparking? " V d.' Substantial impact upon existing transporta- tion spsteas" e. Alterations to present patterns of circula- J, ` tion or movement of people and /or goods? f. Alterai:fons to or effects on present and pote*et'al w- aer-barna, '<�ai; g mass Lrat` air traffic��'- or S. Increases.,in traffic hazards ta.motor vehicles, ` bicyc.is�s� or psehstz3ans: �1 9, YCultural Resoui~oes. Will the'Oronosal have significant reacts in, � +5 a. A disturbance to the, a<r.tegrit r of zrchaeologieal, •'�i paleont log14il, pnd /or,historical resources? J lU. Realtfi. Safetu, ,ayd Nuisance Factors.' hill ENe proposal have sYgn£irnti rosults in: hazard? _ any he Zsh 'hazard or potentia- beatttt :-° a. Creation of f f b. E;posuve of people to potential health hazards? c .'`A risk of explosion ok release of hazardous �.�ubstances in the,event of an accident? d„ kitiIncrease in,'the nttnber of individuals or 'sieges of vector or path; pajelic . rgaa�i -- or f_fie exposure, of people 'to such organisers �.f_/ e. Increase in Existing noise l,e -4els? t E. Sxposure of people to potent:finy dangerous ' noise levels? S• the creation oz`n2xectiona5le odors? : -', •' ; �� /�. An increase in light or glaze? , pnge 5 Y4S .aAYoE - 140 _ Will the Proposal have significant lls Aes�-s, g yesul ig; scet=ic [ =action or degradation of any z a� The obst ''Ar view? vista thetically of£ensiye — b. The cr eation o£ an aes ' site? designated C. A conflict with the objective °f corridors?' or potentigl scenic ' Will ti-se proposal s3tem�s, or tiliti.es and publi;, Services. 12. U ificant weed for new !� v+ ' have a sign to the following, alterations a, Electric Power- 7.,w b. Natu =al or pa,ct�aged gas- systems? \ Communicati ons -_-- Water supply' J d, facilities? Edell e. t*ater --� Waste £,' F1ooP control structures? Solid was faeilita: -�? _ g- ..- U. Fire Protection? Police protecti,°n? _- i, Schools? 'l f2cilaties- or othe recreations? r k Yanks including j ublic fac3fi= crnt =al factiijes'. 1, Maintenance of pa roads and €food m. Other goveromental xoposal Mill the $ and Scarce Feesonrces< . 13. gnere- —iesui have Significanc oY en�rg , Us of substantial Or excessivs fc�7 a. existing ?t : Substantial inc rease in demanr ''P°� � �--- - J b. of energy? you =ces for devel.0ment of „r An increase ,.z► the demand e. energy ? ai new sources OE the consuts tiona or e et la when f easibl "e' .. E d. increase energy a �vable dorms of =es►' Are availah ?.4��j - ;---- k renewable'san =des ai enert$'T _ Y r c c , 1 Page b YES * 40 e- -Substa�ttial d;�pletiori of any nonrenewable or scarce natural resource? l 4 14. xaanaat�orrLFindiri s of Significan e a.' Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, = ;bstakially reduce the habitat of flsh or vJ 'Alife s`p'ies, _ '` cause a fish or wildlifa population to drop below self -41�stainiug f vets, ` \ threaten to eliminate a plant or animal eomtunity, reduce the number°,or restrict the range; of a rare or r Endangered plant or animal Or eliminate important examples of the major periods of C/ !1 California history or prehi5toryZ vvV b. Does the project have the potential to ,achieve short -term, to disadvantage the of.iong -term, environmental goals? {A short -term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief; definitive period of time'i *File long- term impacts will endure well into -the future). c„ Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively (; considerable? (Cumulatively considerable .means that the incremental effz of an individual project are consider" -;e when viewed in .connectio!j,,with the effects of past projects, = and probable future projects). d. Does the project have envimental effects which will .cause subs Cintiki adverse.offects on human beings, either c'#ectly or indirectly? \� ,: II. DISCi7SSION OF MMR- ONI MENTAL EVAIVLTION (i.e., ce affirmative answe 'the above above questions plus a discussion of propaved mitSgatian= nteasurs) J 1V a er i Page { III` DETEMINATIOV I i On the basis of -this a ,,evaluation J I find thoProposed project COLD NOT have a Significant effect on the env3tronment,, aad a NEGATIVE DECLARATip;i will be prepared. Ali I find that although the proposed p;ojecr could ha vM a sign;:ficant effec *, on the environaoent, there still not be a significant effect in this ease because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet hive been added to the ,pro ect. �! NEGATIVE DECLARATxON WxLI, SE PfiEPAR.�.i', j I -find the proposed project FAY have a s;,gnffieant effect om the envirnment, and an 1NVIROXMT ACT REPORT is W;> quired, bate�'C7r Signazv�:e ` r � Title ) t R4%bk' _1hS4Y� 9 !� RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION' GF- 4E RANCHO CUCiWN0A PLAFINING 'COMMISSIOt APPROVING CONDITIONAL. USE PERO T NO, 85 -01 'UR e� RETAIL SH4PPIN6 CANTER LOCATED AT ' NOrk,VAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND., RAN(ONA( AVENUE IN THE GENERAL ' COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 13th AAy of Februar, 1885, a complete oapplicatio!i, was filed by Gary Kanter & Associates for review of the above- describedj� E rojt; and a WHEREAS, on the. 27th day of March, {,4855, the Rancho Cucamongall Planning Commission held a public hearing to �,_iinsider the above -describe (� project. \i NOW, THEREFORE, twRancFo Cucamonga Planning Commiss,,�dn resolved as. follows: T SECTION It That the following findings can be met, 1. That�the propon ^d qt is in accord with ` €tc General Plan, tf.e objectives 1 -1 the Development Cpde, and the purposes of the^ di�irct in which the site. i located. Z. �;;at the prop.�sed use, together with the conditions applIcab[a th �etn, will not be detrimental to the I public health„ ",:safety, or welfaK or materially injurious to ,properties or improvements in the vicinity. i 3. Thai., the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of'-`the Development Code. i SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impact"' n the environment and that a Negative Declaftavl n is issued on March V, 1985. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No 85 -01 is approved 1 saaject` to —t e; gal owing conditions- Pr ANING PtVIS10g: I 1. Wrap west elevation roof treatment around' the north 1 r elevation. 2, Provide heavy pos#.s with vine pockets ,fur the colonades and the eave support. ;Provide attractive landscaping including tree's within the colonades. Q Resojution Nory' Page; 4 ` 3,- 4, retaAing wall is required at the north property li' In order to,:handle imposed structural loads of the, 4djacent gaPages. '/ Ez" 4. The retaining wall' orr the:.east property line shall not exceed 3 feet „maximum'. Within the front yard setback area of the east property line, any retaing or solid wall shall nWexcee4 1-feet maximum. ENGLINELRINIa 017ISION: 1. A permit from Caltrans is required.x r aoy work within the / Foothill Boulevard'ight -,of -way. ' 2.. The proposed driveway apprvaches, shall have tine fallowing minimum: widths - -•, 35 feet for 'main (approach on Foothill Boulevard and -30 feet for alls,athers. 3. Developer shah pay ..reimbursement fees to City for improvements to Ramood Avenue comp ed by noriberly -\lj developers, prior to the issuance of b Iding perm'it's. � 4. The rear service drive shall be posted with "iio Parking Fire Lane” signs. S. Developer shall merge the three parcels into once prior to , issuance of building permits. b. Developer shall :provide, a copy of the recarded docurccnt of ` the easement for drainage purposes along the; easterly property lime to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. APPROVED AND ADOPT0 THIS 27th DAY OF MARCH, 1985. PLANNING COMISSION THE CITY GFIANE'HO .CUCAMONGA" l \" BY: ennis Mtaut, hairman ; ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Depuky Secretary > �: o i- Na. � - Resolutiion Page 3 L Rick Gome-, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commfssion. -,of tht`, City of Rancho Cucamona, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolul, on was duly and , regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning �' ission cif the "td City of Rancho ;"9camonga, at a regular meeting of the Planniogi 0=missian he on the 27th dad -4 March, 5, by�the fallowing vote- to'�t�. AYES: 'a OMMISSfUNERS. ,NOES: COMMISSIONERS. ABSENT: COMMi,SSIONERS» j n X11 �V yr iL � . ., J 4 U of f. O. n� Y �Lv Le 1a �� e0` «gip tt4ir. UOI .YU vgO.r brG NO q. OQY�pgL. u ♦F 4 } ~w ^yV Y�hG4 �'�� DCM UL t4._!R Oi��n� OVT«�•, ♦ DC4. -D 4A V�.� C.r� Etl ♦+OV OEM v�yq ti utl6ry y�`♦,�t�� OcL«r 'V^ aNi2�� v $¢AT u� n !wn U GG..V YaM �My'N �rCyy'�iw g�TB pY.O'ly C.?a. �SnVM =Lti�9Y p�. NQAa YC ��M Or• <<�A.�. ��op r.V S Z ESE - e •i C Yi.R d.< D M atl�opp �� tnn.�N•,;- YE�El rY Nw, cvN- {.v epp,� L' Q N`�091LyCY _ �i. x v p■ L H he N NN«Gpi. 4 nLyYt,6 ^Y tl C< ai Y tl N a 4 p 4 y A V G D w N< ^ V d r'r w'i tlutl'y� pvuq'°"• pp:ro i`fCQ V,g D l�GG\CN CVa=1 < �VM.L S6M 9L &1, 6ti ♦CMRZ O. Y `t H 1 N <.CO � 4•i �iE NxpyOj,�y� `�'-f. n Ap CN Ede Oc z ZZ, I Ug Y y- C C S 1 ^ L`K YMr�i a � r mrN.` .Ln " ♦u�. aar�Ee a°` c �m^�q�''�^7�1 R'Y� L 0� 00 O�YNQ ^l�0��a v• E 1 EWA a C ORO N04d �aD mD� J]CV A N Oty 6r EV.0 l 6 C q ''y e t m m o °� o s L L a o.,r n °.. � a a.� tamp. m o�'oAOV3�yc '• <.r °a mwq � o19y m$ can: UaE .af O p61q • d �RV�D �� :O.pal l•NO� tw � J �� "L C 0•v ^•^ .. c E^ L �• a a ^� s� v o 6 L y S a y. N, 9 c 9 C L 3°'• n-- ac2 •Q% ywy ` NL 6t �.d OYCY°•i� �'Cb W S1vvL� 6UC L! C - Q won. N wEw�o V uw�.q °t « OCOC L6� e�Ltk- @ O q b �EV.a •^ 9 ^O.0 SCE m.•"' Yy�ANA q apo m. Y�m� py1 ,44 u^ °T I qn a ^E. .CmLq m` q.6C pp,, • =u cNN•1c11 m vuY C J.Mb ON N a +9c R.t. nc9 Ga 4Y..Xq= y �b i9 54. - d�OC UY2° LC N.gLL U ^� atN y W �q .--Zs 'dUm V.N myy gg q w m^ mR�c vy ° c n: Qr gw}w{ j.c � mv� > ^0 Iv dLa a � m F6o q aY LDL V °um °I +o° naa.�31d .rnoyY ^V .. v°o.:..°' nc �dw U Lc> sf, UV° aaNi driz ococa. Ttr = °z �c c�n•:A c «a'1a <:ql:m' __ 1 6°E 'AUL n T.n cw 9t ->,b •i.4 W Ur<t mA.rG ^Y m� ac 1:1.° -ia c m^ � T a awl ++q oe m nd IO Oq Sa Ca Y ° °Nr �c E ^ q 6 g g. NRL qN ' .p �� :;qO d✓ m VLE y'61 M i4 L°,9C qu 00' vt 0. LiL 'CELg9C y b0`° wNV6. =m �L CUCigp �Ud cu .D..G LNy A.�¢'r qN V� ��d�9 Ni.� • ^Gm� �..�„s.. -. ^ y u OI,a a^ 1R^ `O�"" V'^• L 9J1f � V R> v hSD� $• ^ram - � °"cv �.�aa cn ;- « NOS CEV Z6 L O9aL11 60L1.� Y OM1 C LLq mL Hm °v�moL �aN �y� A4 c m 2 qnA =9 O ppaD ..y - L9.^ qa �f'O ►• .cy. aoacli 4`" =. 72.1 - J °a +'od NET R�LSyN Nq m ^ mpl LOIN U4�9 °'9' N C C NO �^ RtN � °m`c ac �gC4N9CL cm �� mL.OM L2p^ ^e;� IrrC N�C° GY q L�T4� T b.-.qL UOY '� Lt O�t Ot L O y O N C L m m y U t O T L 4 {y z Lyw YO r COOq EmL 9'b; C mYC� ~d-C NCON.00 C..�P�ao 29Nq V- di uAa> L °o ietCa G u °u° •�A 7eeLw ag- •f �µU -r =C.w in °ugC m. M+; „gcs-..o. yU y. `Oj Fo av a`yU C� i q A9 ' A Ofy •!+ U 4 L' 11 � Y. O T �V,.gqyy�.9 69 o G L O > T c rO... F`t NG. Kr wD NlUR 16Y � «Itr,GO i,tL C! rLOlmom do n° 8` - t p 96u��y /p.. •.. € .it wCq �b•R•C qn 4EM4 i1 r 49 am.N c °vav oT GQNQL c'3�P � °m.y oy Y A �� G a0 i4 Adgmi A6LVQ r mT}�y,L 6eiA °ui m« O ^Q� Oa. g4.L.a° g c �wav Nn�E t mar c ^u N.LN V 4+.0C CL �^ ^ y ° m m C NwC�/ Av >'C° p' ayom. uee m n i_ 10 A a VN N OCC i �t .��m V6 «a E �yQ C E TinT� a y"LL'q !L ^K .,✓L: Jy L u A i mto.m� Lci° € K9 oYN // m =aL d N c u'u oom oc'm LL n aN G.C.R. a Y.a. � y N i C L L~ � q p e Y C O. ny y j G L Oe 1 GO�n~ A'G °mM U'L p «L O°'°?.N 4 VpnaTA �NY nT. c °O NOC A4. Um C °.pqY L ANpI L °. E aOeygT �, 9t QGy «. ;T ml a °AQ CA @q6 v re rLi uLL C� V p Ly /: u m Gc tI mC Cu L Y OmCM1�+ Gn m ^ma C «aG ^O G p .0 uY Cac G =E OG a'G+ C C NL�G qQC Os aV LnAC. Wa ap aC »= N o.Y m na «. c� Y�Mu+•a » L nc. H "N eo. cc fi «° °tea uNa_o m1 oa «a c Ep q O LL�a �dT 4A rt 61 @@� NpQa Lp m �Y �i .G,m t' YE1 gQ„q a Y Ad N Ol'Y r LAOC O »� .0'C WL V N p C A V mi .. YG pfpd E 4T A G VY a «o wLC >&i L4 Ag Nm 4N 4R WV'yie Yp c m ^ Aa =.'c, TA ti moo pu `-'L rk v <L cr L« o L. g, pr' v OC H a m o tea. u .tie r. 22 pbC Zvf u N' .2 IS A^ Q c ° °IGN O m mA qO � I L yi TO Wa C A V m Q1 1f1.�cgU �'aW �� 4, • 3N 6Y6 Z =� pa.... = }Y pA 3a is cy.TN V ^LO il1iTN J W CWac dL,uL �_ Mpg( mLm m r 1d W w F' ®Z UM 9 4v'. x E <d g T LL gLQ WE ° y9 tlYY.. Vary Oi R(l' 7 t O ...ym. Y r ou Q > V C !R O• LL v�.yL Nm< Q y V Y 6mY. L ,06 04nN � d•L xL me' ^dam �r��l •� � mO:YM ` L�_4 y<�*t..y� m wae. m � fY .b.':II qO fu 2 ^ G '...• EQ'4LL M. j4.. Ew � r N�q Qy .�g L n ^ c�ua.q ao� '• >LC a a ..Y Ay =,v *was a°, W Vq � gaOi �," OC9JN w .aC Ha �r py' �nT V by ,CVau^ mElia� ^ 2L M� 3y ?Oqy r�C R d to N Lq L ad Lt E:,_ oR,e. uef e.'n aE z M.a •yam a mt L° 2iw L a O wGE 1Y A 'd V� MON N V.a W 6..'s �0. ti 6T <M uN 4 V� � CyU4 _ LLy� •YV -- S pnm6 « QyR LU... •e 0 !g u e ST �i� '299 gCGi W Y.� yLL a C C U 0.. qL9 rn,c y�o 9-1 a. rOr W O L p CIGL w .^ \ LEL C N LLON OC Unq ... tl V mCY yC.E I 0 .O G w Z a 0 n.0 c 6 4 tl V q E y 00006 >. ° �Tm � mLO 1t '�''.°^' .=i. •+ a -tr �E cq�° .O a _e c e 6o q0 CN mNg dd =yL �y <5L L6W1 O ` Gmv a ` Ro. ¢ i m !�t ti Cy V=S 54 r > t L".K�..GL Vd mY°. 4' N tG tgrL r 1 L Nm OG a. T �' �•C ' I 30 R o'e .r\ =ir. '^ arv.. -+ ri.ze. cm u� � ;e <qci <. °uR• aa' ",. E96 T$ uLL I*% AC' y6 nYS>• YL.. UV g1N0 .ntLC ..l <.d cc= ec a �QmL^ C ��_ 40 w. °.ri a F GmR� i �4m� �•�GL? L pq�` w�v a i.c r Ld c ✓. yy EO.'. rma lxaa L i-e.2 d n zz V C 3 k U Q. V C cj N b d . �� p A t •� C NO' O-Z W.p 4 j Ob ArV; -� t rE. .� Ly�u L� �y yO.W dO. N wi I �. o y aci o COUq zed oz w «. Na przo y� O� aCOi d d d611"• Q AY_ uyd, nL Sq w q CN ^ V q.� Edv E GC. d V 2.d C fZ G 7%_8 Ia- qO p q e6 C `. s r�QMT j�.ya.1 rV� � pp dy�61 yr"iI _ ® q L .YOCO N N �P aE 0y �N dVF S VOL La C� '✓2.. � xz Oq uc d 4 N o e ww i Y a ° aai dun N w N p °L d d G E _ rOur I�ti Gq w0. E iY U L �c N nVEr O ua 0�. tO,IC 4 b. C -0 6: R4 y 6V Lp. SiP! '4q 64L WZ G Rb V:NC wC CL . l�t� h'1 i 4 a` tP l iQ /� ````)4 -m ♦ +`p`Ji'� � St 4 � C C y O E L "ate idi �u TCti • '-_C �V C �O•b M/ .cOO OTY«t ++V 'N4 do pq^ uma` Sb n uza4 aea °a"uxpH Vd.pW++E 4O = E 4 T O d o a- p eur w d. �, ZL . QQ d. rr q z:5 Tcp�.gC'P N dy p O d CI Kd d��. YJ >a x 'c r° •�G' I LO x0 A = DOrLW OU �' uqN NL4FLOI O.00 -V �y l,i gdOQ U 4N V"Ld' 05 O =dNC CNC .G� NY q.v °4 FQ Vn'GnO �N q 2L b q C4oY c H %2B s sue. �P d.adG E q Ff~ N LKy,yZG'gd d =Gx Cp O b YLO��dGC d ^d per°- -0N1O to + °pn Oq 01 pv0 d Od mO Oi dL0 N. yV NN d^ -.W� t 3QNn N'. 64dp s.CO A.ai0" I ECV L++ ... �OV dj qN dpY1.w 4gA0 O4' ^��1.� .��V 60V VO VIN. � xx C � 9 4� 2 • r C p eryI C^ w �.w i W O G d J= V. d L N° —,It . t ' L OC -r '. J 4• O L y b. E O+V Y p �. 6� 01 ` • Ntt' L.•. 4 Y • O�L Va N� noWW N Vw ao' f� C t,7 NJ Lod L d..,• ym° dY �a O6 y Bcg IY Y � H= Z p OON r • _ cc A Vp q tlb Y y • e � G bwCJ • u Cd N m q O N L G -s^ �VyiL.^. qU Lti N NL Vy. V PV ny L L }i Ls. d d b v V C6c 2 Y m T - s" coot '° ,e •+ " p 'S L V Nu VY �,•a. N. �"' L.r Q. L °o. au wo °oL ac « ,., aL yb �. d ¢c mu `o 6 ..°.�� 6�.VV f¢ 6 NV N6W A� 4 2.� •N ir.6R p. r'__N V� OAK U~fp O yc° ALE VO C Ob ¢ A won �a� n EFW �0. y9r dG •Sy O Vb a` "Y pN N.a 4.y L6� �y O6 ON Q dd AC 6Y d. V.O N V 2d y pLY.. 6 •T V Od O N� .� N ?•a'•' C 9�0 Q J N•+p nq V u 4 L q tw h. N G� 4.. L . tl � >uYi �� Y9 V+• p ... W V QV V. Adg TVp. 4 i C 6Y.Y 6V G`�\ WYNLLV i` L°i3 "O �Ci ti�ty 44»�.:'N \1`\ Iz W O G d J= V. d L N° —,It . t ' L OC -r '. J 4• O L y b. E O+V Y p �. 6� 01 ` • Ntt' L.•. 4 Y • O�L Va N� noWW N Vw ao' f� C t,7 NJ Lod L d..,• ym° dY �a O6 y Bcg IY Y � H= Z p G V y� ^• h L V G a 7,. _ cc A Vp ci O\, pE`q Cy.. E4 q O N ja s u} •J tY G -s^ �VyiL.^. qU Lti N NL Vy. ny L L C d � i � AO.0 Ca N�.O u 'S L V Nu VY L.•. W s N G V 6 ..°.�� 6�.VV f¢ 6 NV N6W A� 4 2.� •N ir.6R p. r'__N V� L. eAV_ 3 -2- G d J= V. d L N° —,It . t ' L OC -r '. J 4• O L y b. E O+V Y p �. ` • Ntt' L.•. L Y • O�L Va N� noWW N Vw �. Lod L d..,• ym° dY y Bcg Z p G V y� ^• h L V G a 7,. _ cc A Vp L O\, pE`q Cy.. E4 q O N ja s u} G -s^ �VyiL.^. qU Lti N NL Vy. ny L L C d � 4 L � AO.0 Ca N�.O u 'S L V Nu VY L.•. d.....t V 6 G V 6 ..°.�� 6�.VV f¢ 6 NV N6W A� 4 2.� •N ir.6R p. r'__N V� OAK U~fp L. eAV_ 3 -2- V N . �t O ANAL N cu •rT n� v N / { °19 OILY U C .. ca 1 r' r. T�t v =a o it wl Oa N b _Y C 9 y ° LXu ygNEE p ya-AX a qq `Xy m Ng mot^ ICYE !+ N - A,II.O� A "v, Yd aq V M T °b t O N �b 'G Cr `off ° `^ y, 'ell i i vbD,t v� N p N Y N 2 b G O nra =E Ot,a N a. D• a u O a Y N� 7 C ?M d O G .1 IS � C i y L 6 q 6 u V p A _ p 2 2 to Y- c,°ai, daprC ACV aLVy @w 1!a 6N�.Vy°� at!-. KY2s� t�Y 61+ 6�.y"T.O O3 OWN Y 6 .r Al r CIS: Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGE§. Ctycrtay© STAFF REPOT 1977 DATE: March 2Z., 1985 TO, Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT" AND TENTATIVE TRACT 10349 - ANA AL - A total, resi ential development of to single a� milt'` lots on 33.2 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1 -2 du /ac)," located west of Sapphire Street, south of Jennet Street - APN 1043 - 121 -3, 1052 -1,61- 01, and 1062- 011 -3.. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: c, A. Action Reauested: Approval of subdivision map, site plan,` elevations and issuance al /a Negative Declaration. B. Purpose: Construction of 53 singi,Wfamily homes. C. Location: West of Sapphire Street, south of Bennet Street. f D. Parcel Size: 33.2 acres. j 4 E. Existing Zol ng_, Very Low Residential District (14 Au /ac). f i F. Existing Land Use: Vacant, dead citrus groves. l G. Proposed DensitYs, 2 du /ac. H. `Currounding Land Use and Zoning: Kort single fami -ly homes; Wry Low Residential District South - Single family homes; ,Very Low Residential District East - Single family homes; Very Low Residential District West - Single family homes; Very Low Residential District I. General Plan Designations: Project ite - Very Low, Residential, 1 -2 du /ac North - Very Low Residential, 1 -P du /ac South -Veryy Low Residential't_1 -2 du /ac East - Very Law Residential, 1 -2 du /ac West - Very Low Residential, 14 du /ac r 4, ITEM I R* PLANNING COMMISSION-STAFF „EPORT Tentative Tract 10349;DAhacai z -March 27, 1985 . Page. 2 d. Site Characteristics: ��e subject site is vacant and slopes to the southeast at approlimateiy 59: Vegetation consists of shrubs and citrus orchar�3s, with most of trie citrus trees in a decayed state, The south property boundary has ,,a row of Eucalyptus windrow which should be preserved.' ' 1L. ANALYSIS: A. General: The project site had a previously approved subdiv sign for 58 single family ;ustom lots, which expired January 14, 1985, The develope!^, has resubmitted: a subdivision of 53 lots with basically the "same design as the previously approved tentative tract. The new site pIan complies !pith the 4i current Code in areas of setbacks, 'density, minimum net lot r average, and lot sizes. The net density for -this projec`'is 2 du /ac. The developer has proposed three floor plans ranging from 2,000 sq, ft. to 3,006 sq. ft, with three variations to the from.' elevations. 8. Design Review Committee: The Design Review, rdmmittee has rec "ended approval "of the project provided the following improvements be made, which the developer has agreed -,o. 1. Provide two level,- decorative wall, such as stucco, and "slumpstone, and landscaping on Lots 53 and < for streetscase compatibility along Sapphire Stree.. 2. Provide community equestrian trail on Sapphire Street. C. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee has reviewed the project and determined that with the recommended Conditions of Approval the .Pect is consistent with the_ ',,,`J%. applicable standards and ordGn " D. Trails Committee: The Traits Committee has reviewed the pro ct and made the following recommendations: (See Exhibit t 1. Provide a 20 foot dedicated community trail along the northerly property boundary. 2.` :provide a north -south local feeder trail between Lots 40 and 43, Lots 34 and 37, and a north -south trai1 ' westerly of Lots 31 and 32; ,. 3. Provide a combined local feeder trail width of 15 feet between Lots 19 and 23 and Lot 47 and 18. . 111 ✓ y 'fit PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 10349' Anacal March 27, 1985 Page 3 4. Provide trail crossing with nor slip. texturized pavement between Lots 18 and 47, With the trail on the west side of Lot 47. 5. Provide a community trail on Sapphire Street within the established right -of -way and the requied street trees shall be placed on private property. F. Environmental Assessment: Part I "of the Initial Study has been,; completed by the-applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist and .det6inined that no significant environmental impacts will occur ass a result of this project. A copy of the Part Ix Environmental Checklist is attached for E your review and consideration. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent witk,the General Plan and Development Code. The project viii not be detrimental adjacent properties or cause significant, adverse - 'environmer,Ga°i impacts. In addition, proposed use, building design' 'id sit '(p'lan together with the recommended Conditions r. A11 .Aval ave in compliance with applicable, provisions of the Development Code and City Standards. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Daily Report as a pudic hearing item and notices have been sent to property owners within 300 feet of the` project site. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against the subdivision map. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission issue a Negative Declaration and approve Tentative Tract Map 10349 through adoption of the attached Resolution and Gnnditions of -Approvaklell ,i gc ubmitted, { i ck � omez C ity canner' �G:NF:ns lRttachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map and Land Use_ YY Exhibit "B" Site Utilization Map Exhibit "C" - Natural Features Exhibit "D"— Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "E'} - Equestrian Trails Plan Exhibit "F" - Detailed Site Plan and Conceptual Grading j Exhibit "G" - Elevations (16) Initial Study, Part II ", Resolution with Conditions of Approval _ k. �. t, i *_.. < Z Z Z w -- f! i I `;fit 0 . z 1 _ ilt ui IN IA \ Y l t t t Mwl_ t 1 r it e�• j n-i4 '' 3 1� w z: �g 0 lit j x $11GiMY •'t13C �y { U � Qom. i t � i ' 1 Y µ _ it `i ; �""m" 'our'•— ; —= '. � ,�"��; _ yy it `t N LL �I, k N1 t rot `% }�,.� { ( i9 Og t f, r- mi l lI .r. .iI ff 4 � 1 rr t '� s � 1 �a ( t"•- -t 7, 14-j. av Tk +� s i • 3SY6 � �.. } TT{ 1. � ...... 1 ry � p i ��*G7 F• i � z 11ITIII�6 .� LEFT SIDE ELEVATION Y CIDl f I RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION ` ;t,.ti► , REAR ELEVATION A, B. S -C 11 RC-2A NORTH CITY OF Y ITEaI: RANCHO x'-1 t joNTGt 'TITLE - --�•�- � PL.ANNLNG DIVEST N,� E.%HIB-IT. 'SCALE =1�� Hill �' wil +r r` K Iz H r 11 El, t17 BI El -: � � �, {� � -� � �w� ,� � �� u � � t.� $ ��\ � � �f 5. 1 \.j , ` � ,� - ll-- ....�yf,J �> O S. � _. t! , w r „��:�n ,, t -�: � w �i �� r � � � � � I _ s 4�►. �� 'rte .-. � � � - s � f � .:�. r ID LEFT ELEVATICN 1 RIGHT Et:EVATiON' 4 2ii t j REAR ELEVATION A & B �. RC-3A NORTH CITY OF ITEM. UCAMONGA RANCHO Cl PLANNING DIVLSQN �X%�1�IT SLATE; Q e i 1 FUCK ELEVAMW ED ED =Im f F; REAR �VATICW - RC -,3c r CITY ©F RAN -I0 t UCAMONGA Tom« �49V�,- � PLAMING DIVLSi t \\ t9 i c v r, is I ca a c� 1 h r Mfg � M t q is 7 L r Mfg � M t q is 7 CITY OF RA'VCHO CUCA'10'SGA PART II - INITIAL STUDY ENYIROMMNTAL CHECKLIST DATE;__ - J " FILa IG DATE. LOG NUMBM.,� PROJECT:_ .3d6CF 7idsYLY DTs PROJECT LO I- MON: f • I. ZMROm.NT. I ItSPACTS /66.2 < -CSfj- 3 (Explanation of all oyes" and %Aybet answers are required on attached sheets). 4 1 Q YF.S MAYBE 1: Soils and Gecloev. Will the, propasa? Esa e�.� � NO - significant r�sul,,s in. a. Unstable groundconditiosvr`in ebanges s in - geologic relationships? ,b. Disruptions, disPlarements, compaction aim burial of 'the sail? , C. .Change in topography or ground surface, contour intervals? d. The destruction, Covering or modirication Of any unique geologic or physical features? ` e• Any Potential increase its wind or water t erosion of soils, affecting either on or off site ronditons? f _ €. 'Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? / 1' &• Exposure of peon le or- property to geologic \� hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud - €fides, grou(4d failure, or* similar hazards? h. 4-1 increase in the rate of extraction and /or uste.of any mineral resource" ,S 2. H olasv. will the proposal have significant result$ in: �f� page'`2 YES NO changes in currents, or the course of direction - Of flowing streams, rivers, l or ephemeral stream channels ?, ? h•, changes in absorption t, rates, drP�tiage patterns, ' or the rate and amount of sur1fre water runoff? c. ;> ";terations to the ' ha tars? course or flow of flood +� d. Change in the amount of surface water in anv body of water? / e. ,Dis.Sharge into surface waters, or any alteration of surface water •quality? f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? / / g- Change 3n; the quantity of groundwaters: either through direct additions or with - drawals, or through Interference with air aquifer:' Quality? Quantity? h. The reduction in the 'amount of water other —, wise,`''.vailable `^ for public . water uuPP13eG? I- Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such flooding as or seiches? 3. Air Qualm. Will the ;proposal ' have significant ` results in- _ a. Constant at periodic air em ssiona from mobile or indirect sources? ya - -, - -- Stationary sources? b. Deterioration of ambient air qualitt�,,- and /or ell• Interference With the attainme,t- of\,)pplicab_1 air quality standards? c• Alteration of .Ioca1 or regional climatic" conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? 4., Biota Flora, Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of spet3es, Including diversity, distribution, or number Of any species of plants? "� b.- Reduction of the nu of any unique,; rare ---,. or endangered species Of , Plants? Page 3 \YES c, Introduction `L4YBE NO v of new or disruptive species of n plants into an area? �✓ d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural' production? /l Fauna. Will the proposal'have significant results ✓ in: tom. a, Change in the charactetlae* s�of species, Including div!Vity, distribut';on, or numbers Of any species,lf animals? b. Reduction of th�` numbers "of any unique, rare" or endangered sJ ecies -of animals? ci ntroductio l/ n �,4 new or disruptive species of < <� animals intcian area, or result in'a barrier to the migration or movement of animals ?` d. Deterioration or rgmoval of existing fish or wildlife habitat? 5. poaulation. 4" - the proposal have significant results in, a. Will the proposal alter the locatie "�<<d3stri- bution, dansitt, diversity, or groat.: rare of the human popxation of an area? b. Will 'he proposal affect existing housing; or create a demand for additional housing? 6, Socio- Economic Factors. Wi11 the proposal have significant results in a. Change iu 'locaj� or regional socio- economic characteristics, including economic or commercial diversity, tax rate, and property 1 values? " b. Will project costs 'be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers,'- tax payers or . poject user /`? l 7. Land Use and Planning Considerations. Will tice proposal have significant results n? = ` a. A substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an areal \f b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, ". policies, or adopted -plans of any gdvernmental ` entities? k c. .)4n impact upon the qulaity or quantity of existing consumptive or non - consumptive recreational opportunities? is Page 4 . Will the 8. Transts YES iL�Y3E . NO ts intion proposal have significant resul ins a.. Generation of substantial additional vehiculal- movement? a b. effects on existing`��treets,; r;demand for, 1,�aew street �p construct on? l ff " _ C. Effects on existin' ( � gr0arking facilities, or demand for new parking?" arking? � r 14/ d. Substantial Impact UPOM existing transporta- tion lystems? V t, e. Alterations to present patterns of circula -- to f J ^ tion or n, of people and /or goods? �J�JJJ f. Alterations t,o or effects off present and Potential rater- borne, rail, mass transit or air traffic? 9. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicliclists or pedestrians? % f • 9. Cultural Resources; Will the proposal have significant resultsin: ._ a. A disturbance to the Integrity of archaeological, paleontological, f / and/or historical resourges? V 10. Health, Safety aud,.Nuisance Factors. Will the propo3al have sigiificanc results in a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? �.. b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? z. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances in the event of an accident? t1J' d. An increa,F�: it the number of individuals or species-of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such / organism? I e. Increase in existing noise levels? ,5 f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous / noise levels? S. The creation of objectionable odors? �/ h. An increase in light or glare?� J .a � aL j T: t, Page 5 Lr YES YAYuE NO { ■/. 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant results $A: a. The obstruttion or degradation of any scenic vista or view? 1 C L b. The creation of an aesthetic offensive l`l sitOl c. A conflict with the objective of designated or Jptential scenic corridors? 12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal have a significant need for new systems, or alterations to the following: a. Electric power? b. Natural or packaged gas? C. Communications systems? _._. L d. "Water supply? e. Wastewater facilities? f. Flood control :structures? < $. Solid waste facilities? hr . -Fire protect�on?, I. Police protection? j- Schools? k.. Parks or other recreational £aci].�3es? 1. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads and flood control facilities? M. Other governmental services? 13. Energy and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal have significant results;.in :' a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy! / 1/ b. Substantial increase in`'demand upon existing f _ sources of energy. V/0", % / c. An increase in the demand for development of / °& new sources of energy? I G d. mAn increase or perpetuation ml the consumption of non - renews le forms of energy, �+ gy, when feasible.. � .a renewable source's of energy are available? ,�-:." J�-A _ 'fir. `i��,.r X11 << ' Page 4 \. YE$ »4YBE iG e• $nbst n`tial depletiot 0'z? .nonrenewable or scarce natural. rosource2 r 14. Mandatory Findin s of S,iQair`icance. a. Does the project have the potential,to. degrade q the quality of the(.nvironzent, substantially t; I' `3 reduce the habitat ' fish or, wildlife species,: wild cause a fis[ or fe pcpultr.3art zo,.drop below serf suctaining levels', threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, =educe the number or ' restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or rrjjiaal or eliminate important racabAl of the major periods of California his to� prehs�rp? b. Does the project have th ^,potential to achieve short -term, to the..disadvf4intage of long -term, environmental goals? -(A sho=t-texn impact on the C% environment is one srtuich Occurs to a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long- term impacts will. endure well Into the future). / �f c. Does the project have impacts which are = individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable c means that the iur ;remeutal effects of an individual project are considerable ,II when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, ! and probable future Projects). = d. Does the project have environmental effects �l which will cause substantial adverse effects an human beings. either directly or.,Indirectly? IT. DISCUSSTM4 Ar v*,mTSQ2DfENTAL EVALUATION ~� the above (i.e.,,_-of affirmative answers to questions plus a discussion o£ proposed mitigation Measuras�to I - i A - Page 7 °. i11. DET %3INATIO%I On the basis of this .tial evaluation; I find the proposed,project COI:".. NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATINE'DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although ehe proposed project could have a.significanc Li effect on, the environment, there ""icant will not be a sig effect in,his case because'` mitigation measures;descr an ed on attached sheet havi., beers added to the project. Y A EGATIVE DECLARATION WILL B� PREPARED, E�-1 I find the proposer project !,W have a significant egl dct on the _ envirnment, and ar. Eq7ROMMST, LIPACTIREPOrT' i es}u Jed. j, Date �3.�I J 7 Title r I �\ RESOLUTION NO. _ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING `COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVI�,G TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 10349 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract M p No. 1'49, hereinafter "Hap" submitted " by Plaza Builders, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Co my of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a residential sub ivision on 33.2 acres of land located at west side of Sapphire Street, sou of Jennet Street into 53 Tots, regularly camel before the- �Plannjng Commissio for public hearing and action March 27, 19$5; aad - WHEREAS, the City Planer has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's_, reports ;: and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered thez Engineering and Planning Divisi6h's reports and has considered otjh� evidence% presented at the public hearing NOW, THEREFORE,,, the Planning Commission .of the O3ty r Rancho ' Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION ° 1: The Planning Commiei—Ision An kes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 10349 and the t,`ap thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; -_ (b) The design or,improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; �? (c) The site is physically suitab44or the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental - damage and avoidable Injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not,confiict with any easement acquired by the public, "Atge, = now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. q �.3-2� nw Resolution No, Page 2 (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration 11 issued, SECTION 2. Tentative Tract Map No. 1,0344, a copy f which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the foJIowilig conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION: 1. Provide two level decorative wall `,',such as stuCGO and; siumpstones, with landscaping on Lilts 53 and 1, for streetscape compatibility, -along Sapphire Street,. 631tailed plans sha "I be submitted to Planning ',division for review and approval prior to- issuance of bu iding permit. 2. Provide a 20 foot dedicated community equestrian train along the northerly property line. Final tract map shall be revised to provide 20,400 sq. ft. minimum lot size on Lot 44 after dedication 0 trail. 3. Provide a community trail within the established right-of- way along. Sapphire Street and the required street trees shall be placed on private property. 4, Provide a north /south local trail between tots 40 and 431'.-, between- -lots 34 and 37, and a north /south local trail westerly of Lots 31 and 32 S. Provide a combined trail width of 16 feet between Lots 19 through 23 and Lots 14 through 1 a Provide trail crossin, with non. -slip texturized pavement between Lots 18 and 47 with the,trails on the west side of Lot 47.. 6. All cut and fill slopes fronting on public streets shall be landscaped par City's slope planting standards. '+ Hydroseeding will not be acceptable. �r 7, The existing Eucalyptus windrow along the southern property boundary shall be preserved. Any remo -V,�l of trees shall require an approved tree removal permit prior to the approval of a rough grading plan and prior to issuance of any permits. ENGINEERING DIVISION: 1. Private drainage, easement with concrete drains for cross itd",` hilh i d I I Vf tdlt V a�nage s a a requ re a ong a a, et, e o s, including those along the southerly tract boundary. The easement shall be delineated on the map. 1 !. Resolution No. ' Page 3 , APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27th'`9AY OF MARCH, 1985. PLANNING COMMI6iION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA c 8y. .Denn`�is i L.Stout,, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, dick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commmission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passcd;; and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27h day of Marcht,.1985, by the following vote -to -wit. 0 RYES: CtfISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS; ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: x.. ..t Z V L O L d e sY do TU O='a:Mi aens ^r w$wT a oaO of o.'c.w cc .c +.fin ct yp LOp 2 p V9 Yr.UVp +.Y ♦ srti C6V..i� 4 wC OA br".YQ 33 81 .N au2'w a' NCA J. v �_ �w YOfg`i'^O�+`�� ° O.00 oS•E• CYw`ihi �Cq Oz at; �OS� Ar� °�ryiv Q ^o Y6°`o� C�Gq. 4o�c ®, yUyYtY. y.a YzN'^N 04 YY ^p = °Y GL^ Y.w^.V.V p4 y EcSa CCZ v. Lw a�,iN$ N$M�i gV ,.�L�� YVCS04. YY9 X I-. SO�Sa �Cy� OCY a.c.Nn y.?� =g Cu °reW� YYU Ua.ApO - u 'VY =H4 'kNUS -C-0 v +�° v.c"°'o OY�. �d 4 AL'E "ti.t 4-0'.+ �. N.CCO nCY 9E U. :-;E= ' YP aLGp Y *!{O 6tt . qtV l.^.N 4 S V X004 Yd A A- 3 C Va C a YcY_,w��c OLNJ z `y C CVz np^R�Y V T N 2:7 2 4- O f O O E L Z �C .-a O� L &I, '"r, K w G C 6 N e1 1� A of a U a D H v a u � o i O W • $'Nn Y1 V a N gC N 2 -}Q Z q T N NT CYO WYtO aSr.1 V X64 �O �Ntlp v O }L f y Y V OY 4 � a°cA G w N a ^YG it -. r. m 4 i N.c �g�• _ O W • $'Nn Y1 c� p4° VN°iF 2 L 1 Oa+y LC >r - y ti0� - ° 2 »q QGC.. .. °a Kr^ Opi. ^ °i4 °ag C iaL LE,:7C L Yy .--z QE 2r _w A, qN E Om° aL"Q Q. 55 4J .ia °. �. ��LS'.w6 C. ^nAN TL Va LSy YON eaG ciy a3 4 I ua L CyL Q yC0 }mw °L y Ny a ii ..G.. 1 � d tG � :E v u q cawu. 8mq,r em =0ai myT �t C .wt�� w.°i Vii. �u yE�� rtirTL ��V^ CL. °�•-[� c v1�V Q µ.a3 g6.G X66 t QY. rLA �. �• » p� .Cip.Ce L L ^ c °q Zjia a°tdr $. o�° K o .ate ow.oYm �� p L7 LuO dome q viz -ti a'ay�w L�Np mj qo DQ El fK �L .mac w w ca d ac c„gY;mai ° +Z} _ ze ga °Cb °rq °� a0a+CC gC Tp'^ V G'NYLS n C G y�YII I V�Nr vC .w .Tw U Y t tnq ,S n xa¢mi dra` . °a L 2 E r -% u E a a L v y g G nc 4.r7 GU !C at+w° +imam E r "axe, G »y 'ma4C L ^TInN a aV.0 °.'-.. C� tip pC ^� � u m »G Yva'2 pdy O m E y L K G o w � wd tai � EL a ww q r"rnq Ymq� a+..G� TV wd9 CY -.Zr- 2.2 eaa a-c ..�L ro z.r e®s x yw� �= a m�� ays aim •.s CVN ca. gip; .L,r'cW eSV�i. :X c ON yf mop ^9,a �. : Ktu gymo. 3w� »4°aya, o aq at'aO aEi t4 dw» r d= a4 L gGLGN GCe G �� O ys m° °i ec w mN ''.uL. �E' L N +'y�LOq CgFmE. ap O.grOW N. E°C m q C 6r 550 °L- f.l 6+ L p H L C ^ C C i.r 4 n tit. D L OI ^ °YM C. ° rv�iq Gy TY:t 4pW n*• Yak'^ C6u'q. CAI .'pa 9'1bVGa ~6�wI GGGI='Jap .°n �p ~°��. $9N'° 4 d G � ate Y N.ara Y oao mCt Y� E a 1O q t c e: oA C �n mEsg . Ca � ai rTL O e . s c' C a GY Y ° .;� .m` °a s R'rO6 SEa+4.� °U...ose -n. w.NMG d =�' .SL. SwU NO' $L:L9 b 6 r 4 . = b�L°� + .af +da�LV 7vd ffC�SD� Apd y Vey �6LT �L 3 O skV D ^'O --Z, iiai�a .9L A �w ^G.. N6gfS t G4 .n dS Olp4 G L G mfg ZLFti L G.W. L a rd a 6} D C Y a4m .GS ^y C + t� aN tivfG 2:9. 4y t » i Gam? oLC� FOM.,\ 4 �A' tOMDM VSLA° 941a 34 ry6pi� N gL-s- Y2 mY DAN nt a aw.2 m. r O + �p. w CiL.lY LD1:.. �. G CGDprn+Y w�O r�N: LC 6m- - fw aai to DI. STr 4L � Lay'yn:w csa°� vz2 Zgtc qCr by V Z .. b t + Mw by .Q. D°'MN G� V� G a9i at =as 9' �a V ,yw Nb �fDi�Q bKt�O. bytt 6^ 2NVb 4q�G6 �tlbYy tv Ou4w IDb A.Z.- • - 9� d 3 .� mIIO� Oi6a 4a31.i� AO'40' �O �_ - 4� 6 GCm +1 6 • '� Yii �....ng G .fT OQ F= wLV cmG QY a D♦ A E pG aw au_ MdgY 6 f a�i f.Z O bk hQy C� 6z L2 4 y G s4S�Easb� = »q : Y � Dy z� µG A' tl0 wiM L'�vS'� �Crs $ w°10.� t4 ' � r Y9 dp -Q ��•�� D tlN tl �� _ 9 L`O: y +', X =G my �y TlN L�.,.p CD S(�M 4'iSgi tlS^rt L¢ O, �Y • Y` tl V9 G 3C V.ag zo 6C�N 4r + L+6■ r �O "� gU Nn c rro LNtLr _D�fQno N4�� : Dit{ q gy b {\�'Y w° i j V Kam•., 9 T 9a+ � DDL`�a+ p43 yi6N G. G.G� !R q� �� @= S[} 10 LAG t=X i N L� br bN U:t Z.- 94 �YdC� aC L AiR NC C4�0 rOQV Effb G`� LL K g Q yb M� i K J G qwa qYC =»tl^� CLG 'sY +� r+ Kyv6 SCDGfR� C 4 � --.` �l Gd G �." ~ASN fbjfa -w + y.D 1i+ bFLGp _r V .rte f1 $ O✓ y NMZ1��i Ku m. Ob 'f { �F�,` ax'D ' yy b -15 T�1 SS �� aw C Y N,M1 °�~ -t ^ Ve F`D'b :,-t LLD t d Cn i'0.9 �z <. w 4 D 4 C9 N�� C� :K y O» C +.� L '0..ym v D� 4. X ,i( GN Lam.» _ SY 6Y. i i 3M ^Otl HNC 6s YK�; •°tam Ga a.. Mod qw iii CDCw�4 oe v[1.o r \\j a Rx E Co = h.•rr Yd4� � � •E o s��.. S L.: - Jr' —•JL� �y +.. V Lm MG -- ^_f �� ham —.9� 2V eAg�v �aA•'�'s T am, 6.» aA. oRi �v gd 9 •� v�sr ' + s�s s FS • a so cf_°n o° ° �,• { s °` Cam. i gv o ay a i yE.G -p' CLy... fl+6 ash •w� l •Qiy� � r�Q— i 6 Q • SCE 69 9 ��. 4u. M.;� +ra a:tYU ¢ 6 4S K.gs 1 ma•s � i i� =51i c C y X a c ®— c Z _ P �• r4 _�w E 9 IE ' c. z - L V. a u , m s° s „ • s C C ero @ c ol ae • 3 >E' m `�t =;s 9L,6, .. y. h Ypy.cQ j.0ar g _ O C e • oc iQ g ;� � • r6•L — � r. ak •• ;O •� m'� d! �L try E< o. warmer Ci iv o .: h�ZC a �L ” hi w :tioa c y d UZ L M,a 6Q OL L6i C pC L ra pp at •G IEEE w N= RL20 w MCA • ar y "� �+ •Y h h6�. pi`O,tiFSS VLai 0410 yCLiL •�8 u `dc Va_ zzm c s aIk :: < csP a® mml, i CsM iC E $:�C"� tr`+g6 G •S•6 ff t L ?S O Ji HH 6L C+� •' ®. z r A. cm� Dv ter:. ti. f�E o.sa'M.0 l r��.sc aiwna ♦-as .c c 1427 co Z fE {i - c �'^ �. �°+ dy°.N L6 a� 9cmL•A N }1._, L w i a, a.. a4.c �B. '•-, dRNT O F.F 7d q0 .R wra R� dUN Ct ' �Z 7c9 !' 'rO emess ase y -� ac E 9. = V M I w ... w oV L O O •a C aY. LiO � 7a .tea w?:' rvZ � .Z Gq LL i Cq. L„' �T; T m;[i iN N YOKE E �bZQi Ep �� - Oer V'O +C baPy� GMyr 0.16 4p�� 4R <ML 4l Z, L VRaKC QL . I f I 1 j f►`� � "`� i, Ln _. L4 O n N O _ C�,� E �LC� d .ta � dRy 0a°✓4 � d06. .. 4 C 01�N D• � SSU t L ^m� .iii t � '. � Yq .. IS Adm E w m oa �0...�. F .0.._ a w l -Z it I �� .'Ca� i rr ^^ y Cc NLq .E O'er LaRi � IDYtil PR R 4^ y =L Owd �,Q LC ZO y�q � 04� aL •- i b-5 du++T r. iv ao ^ R d Q Odds yN m Cay+ _ ° LrC� 7.�.W s N a -1 `�•'AD •. A•j YID it ^ - 11". 'E t � N�d Lib lS.0 ooaaY b ac r Y 3s .°.ro -p.. v E ay C Srb 9 S. 9 b � .. �. -. d �u NEN gC i Y o= N y •y a P O ros C.L. b CL. N .•. b .� C ✓ bE ..`° bu y� 2 E UZ. )� a u q ° N C 6 C= L N°•✓ ~ ° VLCU 6 4L C aL NK 4.a bib w✓ E .ate WW YONro L,S L• ^d L CCtiecbi Abe qGG G� �q.6 Y~ 6 ✓C 019 'OL.� t fi 9 u .� pa N bt°. 2z. yy �2 64V Np,�� Lr y.N✓ y � E � rWL � ✓ V•y'mot C9y..�� i dq b..y ,G W.-. �C .�. ✓u 9 H`" `�. W y q�uELp � _ G✓ camel i� T ro y Y G L i b i� 25- p u d o L N q � Y u O� r5 rC b.0 Ku Y O °.�� '� r p ro9 N.O U C Vu ddC Ta p N v4. L� dy ro �I °NW W C^ YY9s9vp� � it b �p1O C ✓Q y.� 0y. �/r °NV a E� 'c Lyt qJ' Sa C W q� C d ro 6^6.gvE� dG rt cif a wd.$ au YOf�4 bo� vpy y i _x C Y ° ✓ C°IM N✓°.0 NV u ° x.00 p.l. II {. d ei bu iF L rb ;r w S db dW i ' G2G �.. ✓ OC.L riia�R�OI 1 NO�L y_M 9 Q2 V v ty N"'9- NL O.0 b C W bO, «V jV _ r �� > N i b� � Vi6r✓ � V y d0 Y 6 ✓: '111...�.c�� aNa La'a YvY rob _ ro b?E� Vd' i.q E u~i �O Q.V=. C r E q i d n El S 01 ror C, Z t NJL' W! CW 6 uG r � � p� f 7r rorr � G NQ'FC a q ro ✓�y u'� c q a 5 O QdC c V 6 gbp0 2C. qbd� 6Cig 1� �Q6 OC 9i 6'A qEqE C W aC�b <+ gIIbC bu0o L b C �V�O YN m s a o a t Y� it/ 9 C v E LKf.I NOW q.� Q p n .M hpwu ti�4 pY q ci d C c AML ad< u r Vim` 44 rr ~Y p aM10 V - C y CYr VE 7C qt L � - YZ Z Is zu z n G 3 2N1 'R .a .i naL.r - N i MR rGa��p Lt iL ii ry u cr a� v 4 c W — wr � u� 'YV W 0. aid+ Z �N tC rC Wiz- C. N2) rOU r �O Wy.q L.i.Y4 LL Yn yL F L :- 'p N 6 C Y6lM u n ~a N ... C Y r L O !> VW ..C. A gt L,asL Oin qrw Stan RNN de.. �ij �LN ^V >�Cc 'e� .. O Ypq,..rN N09 NV.0 yiN L� ~C � LLN+ u✓ Zi- sL C 4a4 i V^l y,=^'w d9f .�V +dam yy~ y SCt 2-rC. H. 7 s °' �r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REPORT .,STA.FF _a 1 o a. DATE: March 27, 1988 T 1977 TO: Chairman aid Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: John R. Meyer, Assistant Planner c SUBJECT: POLICY DETERMINATION FOLLOW -UP - DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA FOR OFF$1Ti 'BACKGROUND: On February '27, 1985, the Planning Commission conceptually approved the use of offs1te loading facilities where 'spur access was unattainable. The Commission directed staff to prepare recommendations for development criteria concerning these facilities. ANALYSIS: Offsite Vpadi »g facilities should be consistent with, the i Industrial Specific Plan requirements in terms of street improvements, landscaping, screening and circulation as follows: - o All loading facilities, materials, supplies, equipment, and opera}:» . trucks shall be adequately screened from public view using'Aa "`combination of walls and lanscaping, Screen ° wails shall be concrete masonry or other similar materials not to exceed 10 feet in height, o Landscaping requirements should include berming and a ,dense planting of evergreen trees a }td shrubs. - -r o Circ0aktion should ensure adequate turning areas for trucks. No maneuVpring on public streets will be allowed o Outdoor storage of materials or products should not be allowed at the luading facility, unless permitted by Subarea and properly screened. Presently there is a loading facility located on 8th Street, just east of ArchibaA. According to a representative of Santa Fe Railroad, the facility j,s leasable. The facility has been inspected by the City's Building tpd Safety Division and has been determined to be structurally sound witt�,Oinor repairs. J 1'.i ,; F� o r� , �`. ITEM J �i ,. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ;f Policy Determination Fallow -Up 27, 13&5 March c RECOMMENOAT104 If the Plannia- Csmmiss on determines that the criteria , described herein Ire adequate, then staff should be directed to prepare "F an Industrial Specific Plan amendment, *0:6'iiAgly. Should the Planning Commission determine that the existing loading dock available for kease • by the Santa Fe(� is s adequate to- service the needs of potential, users, then stNf should be directed to inform.Royal Creations of the Comm'.�,sion's decision. R ectf y ubmitted, t i is Cit_ Planner RG:JN: jr 1 o i r 3 '��y..- k}.�',,. w,i.TS >e.a.a.�.l 'T��.,, �'X .._�"iL:. ,- `'�• '°t'!r _ _ -'... I --- CITY OF RANCHO CUCa DNGA C —MONK ST"F REPORT �)� t o �. z U � _, DATE: March 27, 1985 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Howard LO\ fields, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85 -03 - �GABRIC Development of 16arparking spaces with full impfpvements; on Parcel 1 of - Parcel Map 6194,. located `south of 7th Street, between l?aven and Utica Avenues within Subarea 6 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan - AP 209- 411 -002, I. ABSTRACT: The proposed off -site irking lot under construction 4is not received the City Rlannerl: approval. Rather, the stAff referred this proposal to the Planning Commission for review of two important issues: (1) relationship to the Haven Avenue Overlay Distract; and (2) precedent- setting and policy implications of this proposal Il. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Review and consideration of a 'proposed 160 �\ stall of t eel parking lot: `- �� B. Purpose: `for the development 'df 'a fully imprdjved off -site parking consisting of 160 stalls. C. Location: South of 7th Street, between Haven and Utica Avenues D. Parcel Size: 1.6 acres E. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning. North Vacant, approved DR 84 -51 (High'Tech Office).41 Industrial Specific Plan �� South _ Vacant, Industrial Specific Plan �,;- East - Vacant, approved warehouse project (DR 84 -30), Industrial Specific Plan West - vacant, Haven Avenue Overlay District F. General Plan Des4nations: OF t fits' a Industrial Park North Industrial Park 'r South - Industsrial Park East Industrial'Park� „ West Industrial Park j ITEM K d ,1 G 1`� s PLANNING I +tI$SION STAFF REPORT E .liiAor Del�eiopment Review, - 85 -03 - GABRIC r° > r'srch 27, 1985 J,. G. Site Characteristics.. The project site is currently vacant with ind getious E wee s and shrubs and slopes southward approximately'a 2 percent grade. Area Specific PIan (Stt6rea, H. licable Re uS +'s: Industrial an par King requir, ats (Development Code), Pari,ing facilities designated --or int use should not be located further than 300 "feet fr rAll he structure or use served. J �; i - YIL. ANALYSIS: I( A. Background: General Dynamics has entered into a lease agree;°° ntwith Leed Cucamonga II partnership for the least of an existing warehouse distribution building at 9050- Utica, Exhibit "B ". The term of the lease is three years with options extending the ter,i to thirteen years. General Dynamics intends ^ to utilize the teased property for administrative, engineering,.. and laboratory activities. B. General: The applicant, General Dynamics,, has app�Yi'edv for a Minor De rtlopm "t Review for the express purposes_oiL(having the ' } City render � favorable determination concerning the I development of a temporary fully improved off -site parking facility (160 stalls) on subject; site (Exhibit; "C ") . �e applicant has stated Lthat this project is critical to th,_ operations in the nearby- facilities, and therefore paramount to the "relocation of production activities and employees. Presently there are 115 on•site parking stalls available for the leased building: at 9050 'Utica. lie po, dosed project will provide 160 additional parking stalls for;:a a1 "'275 stalls for both on -site and off site parking cor iderations, PrimarZ Issues::.. The staff has referred ihisl� � to the "Planning o ion to review the project's r €,,zionship ,`ko wl. (_ Haven Avenue and precedent setting policy implications, as discussed below. Based on t:e following tabulations the prof -t proposal will _ng provide an adequate number of spaces for lil 1. Building #1 (89,622``s4. ft.1 at 9050 Utica Areet j Office Vse = 21,280 sq. ft. x 11250 85 spaces ' Warehousefl4fg._ =, 46,342 sq. ft. x 1 }500 = 96 s aAces 71;320 sq. ft. = spices Existing parking spaces 1�166s ar�c a parking spaces needed 6ssoa- a )l i 3 'rte [� PLANNING CORMISSI0n-i AFF REPORT i - Minor Development Review\85 -03 - GABRIC March 27, 1985 Page 3 4 Although General Dynamids 5'�7urrently negotiating the lease �! agreement For Building #2 at ;,10611 Acacia Street, they are , unable at this time to provide staff with detailed information 'regarding the largest employee shift or derailed use of the (� second building. if similar calculations_are'used based,gn the �Guare footage of this building, then the estimates for parking &,has follows, L 8uildi.ng` (60,728 sq. ft.) at 10611 Acaci "�a Street _. u Industrial' Mfg /Warehouse = :33,728 x 1/500 = 79 spaces Office /Administration = 21.000 x 1/250 = 64 spaces `; _163 spaces Existing`park<'ng. spaces =+�6 spaces Parking spaces nWZ- ! 3` splices The above calculations Were tabulated on similar estimates used for Buildinq #1. If both buildings were being considered for the off -site parking lot, then a total' of 133 spaces" (160 proposed parking spaces) would be needed to accommodate bath ,Y leased buildings (1061f Acacia Street and 9050 Utica,Street).'` Relationshi to 'Haven Avenue: The first issueAs whether they. `" construction off a parking of as the primau land use con icts\ w tithe o— als and a . cies at u area 6 and tea acent Haven The is "contiguoys to venue ver ay istr,c ,. project site a 'corner ving f gage Haven Avenue, Exhibit \ parcel a—Fi along,. 'is l� "B ". Although the subject parcel (Parcel 2) not included in �\ the Haven Avenue Overlay District, the proposed development on " the subject site would affect what development possibilities ..could occur on the corner parcel {Parcel 1) For instance „ Haven Avenue Overlay requires a 300 foot minimum lot consistent with the access control policies. Parcel 1 would have to take access off of 7th Street near the east property line, Thus, two separate driveways would be created close t gether along 7th Street. Furthermore, the requirements far setbacks from Haven at�'d development requirements (e.g., open space, parking) would severely limit future development possibilities for the turner parcel. Futurd development of single parcels of land in this manner would prevent or preclude development of adjacent parcelsIn the best way feasible. r. Urban Policy Imolications: The second issue W the recedent- setting. nature L al'- roro o�sa an the detriment; a eci s on estab— blished -U: ban Y a__ 91 c�. 7 The consIderation of off-site parking per the Dtveiapment Code are follows: "Large 1 parking lots or parking facilities designated for joint use s!liould not be located further than 300 feet from the structure r use served," x t n' ',PLANNING COHMISSION STAFF REPORT Minor Development Review - 35 -03 - CABRIG March 27, 1985 Page 4 j f ` ``'However proposal of this nature even if it is a-temporary low Intensiv; use would set a precedent in `the Industrial Park designat)on and place it adjacent to the Haven Overlay Districpl There is staff concern that this type of proposal could -.jJit to and proliferate similar —'requests I the �" future, thereby creating land -u_iz Conflicts (i.e., er Planned areas, vs temporary low :intensive uses). IV. FACTS FOR FIi9QMS.`;_Before approv ng the Minor Development Review.' the" Panning Comeaission must determine that the project is consistent wzith the Industrial-Area Specific Plan and wr ,11 not be' detrimental to adjacent properties. Further, tke proposed use and site plan, together with the remmended cond't'cions of upprnva' >rast be in compliance' with all applicable regulations— of the Industrial Area Specific and Development Code; „ If � \tf;a ' ,-Plan ti Commission determines t�stAhe project is not consistent with'+he intent of the industrial Specific Man and may be detr%enta'l?tto adjacent pr��ies by limiting access, the project . ihould - not use approved. k V. CORRESPONDENCE: Tuo 'fetters We bee- , received for this project and are attached to this report. a VI. RECOMMENDATION:-,: it is recommended that the'Plan"ning Cow: ;ssion review, all inpet and elements of this project. If after such consideration the Planning -Commission concurs with the facts for findings, approval of Rinor Development Review 8.5-03 with the adoption of the attached Resolution would bean order. Re ctfu ylbmi fed, ^, it Pla net, Wff:ns Attachments: Exhibit 'wA" - 'Location Maly -� Exhibit *B4, - site UtM74tian hp Exhibit "C" - gaikifig Lot Layouts' -0 Exhibit "D" -Haven Averse Overlay Distri( `) Exhibit '4E" - Master Plan areas '* t 6 TERRA VISTA PLAN RED COMMUNIT s r is _q m -- —� - OP _ t z Futuro catr OP'� Hai PC N*f 11 ■t M' _ Lq As I., UlL _ _ iLS -P aTy OF { I P�ix�i"►€tiV� l';SK�`+i Es�CI iiii�i S�.€.E= •..-- t 1, �:--- ;�: __ �,, n t_ ` . ��,� G'a iii; +1, Awl t r� .3: r ti � F F r� 11 s 1• ' J R I 'Oft N TFT CrI Fi f i'laJC1LY _� --4 N i_ TITLE` �^`, " ° PLANNOC aMSIC 4 .1 - rt EXHIB SCALE �i �S A ,, l R. S k c• ,r y x � subarea 3 gffil � p _ ��r U 0 41 , CITY Off'= lift PL.ANN N-G,,i R%SI4:'.i �• / o t� •i CR . t 4 OF RANCHO GJCAM©NG TAFF REPORT I G i1_q� Q �n 1977 , i DATE: Marc.: 27, 1985 � T0: Chairman and Men, brs�s of the Planning Commission FROM: Rik Gomez, City Planner ti? BY: Curt Johnston, Associate Planner �. 4 SUBJECT: AREA Ob(ILOPMENT PLAN FOR VICTORIA. GROVES VIJ AP-#1 tis eanceptuai_deve opVSent Plan for.Victoria Groves -Vils 4 172.5 acre Portf6n of= t#te Victoria Planned Community, located on the 'West side-,., of Milliken, avenue, south of J Highland Avenue, and 11orth, of the Pacific Electric Railroad treks -'APN 211-13,'38, 40, 41 and �,02- 22I -27. I. PROOECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a Area JevQio pmont plan for i Victoria Groves. ,j B. Pur ose: To 'establisb Athe future land use pattern for Victoria Groves Vil,agS: C. Locatioi South side of Highland Avenue, west �f Milliken Avenue, •north of the Pacific Electric Railroad 'tracks, and east; or the Deer Creek C�;jnne1, D. Parce� l Size; Approximately VL5 acres. ' E. Existinq Zoning` Plannee,Community, F. Existing Land Use: Vacant G. Surro ndirg Land IIJ si, an! Ztoni�nt_ ., Worth - Varant property, Low- Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac), (Caryn annQxat approved). ion and development South Vac.-A. property,,: Terra Vista Planned Community, deSignAted..&; future 99 acre park. East VaoanW property, Victoria Planned Community i _West Vacant property. Beer Creek Channel, - designated . Low. . o- 4 Residential 2 -4 du/ac _ . -and Low- Medium r Residential 14-8 ITEM L) y, M PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT V'igtoria Groves Village Mat -ch 27, 1985 P4, 1 t, ,N. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Planned C o�munity North - Future High Scho Site, Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac) 1� South - Park Site East - Planned tommuni West - Low Residential du /ac) '(Z-4 I. Site Characteristics: Th Victoria Groves Village project site is predominantly vac t with "the exception of a pepper grove which will be pre erved `within the proposed park site. Presently, the sitZfis undeveloped with no structures or improvements existing. II. BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract 12544 was previously submitted on This s property in January,1984. The Planning;Goimtission reviewed the project during regular meetings and' had a „special workshop in June. At the time the Commission ,had a number of substantial.; design comments concerning the'trail, system, Victoria Park lave, ; the street right-of-ways, land use-* 66d ,grading. Minutes #'rata the Planning pommission workshop are attached for your review. Since the workshop, the applicant agreed to withdraw tentative _ Tract I2544, but proceed with Che review of an Area Development,, Plan for 'Victoria Groves Village. The Area Development Plan is intended to dress major issues svgh as: Variation of lot sizes and product types; LocatioG and scale of greenway trail;;' - Basic gr:.ding concepts; and Conceptual street layouts Considering the level of information, the area aq'velopment pion;- -__ has responded to the concerns 'expressed at ,Commission 'review workshop. During of individual tract ma' `%)a greater Uvel of detail will be provided. _ III. ANALYSIS: A. General: The area d6elopment” plan indicates two phases. Phase I consists of, 858 lots, with minimum lot_l=zes from 3,000 square feet up to 7,200 square feet. Six variovs. -unit 'types are proposed, as r�! quested by the Ce ;hmission at' the workshop including, single family center plot units with attached and detached gar, °�qes, duplex Urits, and zero lot line units. The following table provides a breakdown :of the lot sizes and corresponding unit types in Phase 1. , r PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Victoria Grnves Village March 27, 1985 � Page #3 ,I Minimum /Average Lot Size unit Ti e' Number ,, Units 7,20018,280 square faet Censer Plot 86 5,000/6,120 square feet Center P1nt 154 4,500/6,300 square feet Center Plot 94 4 =000/5,180 square feet Center Plot 142 ;a (Attached and detac'ied garaggs), a 3,000 /4,100 square feet - Duplex, Urn Ltik 201' Line. 3,000/4,570 square feet Zero Loo_ Line 181 Ta *al = 858 Lois Phase. I1 of the Victoria Eroves Village consists of - approximately u5 acres designated i:edium- RnAidentiai ' 4 -14 du/ac), Medium Hi4h Residential .(14 -24 dufac)s and Village Commercial. The residential ,areae of pFiase 1,1 will ,consist of condonErtium and /or apartoi6t.' projects, verso the singe famif Y unt t types P r PP o sed in Phase I� c ,r B. DesignReview Ca i*tee; A,mayor concert' identified by the Corranisszon and the Design Rect" Lemm;ttee was to proyvjde an appropriate denristy` transi~,UW` between phases `T and In .:II* response to the Committees,' concern, the applicant desigt?ate'd the northeast corner' of 'Yictoria Park Yine and the' Loop Road, Medium Residential versus Medium 'High as originally 1roposed. The produrt type would be attached, multi - family with a density.of roughly 8 -14 snits , ¢.per acre.. °The ni ' "Numo densi }y residerr~ia? project would when fade , +t1to a, Hiher density attached pr 61;Ct: i;s the- 14-24 unit- per acre range. J Another revision to theia3ea:Deveiopment Plan requested by the Cittee, 'included 'providing, a trail connection o the souther ?y railroad tracks.- In response to this cope. ,o the applicant provided .a trail Connection 4n the 7,200 square foot lot area, directly south of the north /south'rgreenway ,paseo as shown on Exhibit "8-1". The trail Connects, to the railroad tracks betweat 2 kits and eotg front Yirds'on a cul -de -sac. other Items discussed by the Committee and incorporated into the Conditions of Approval include., openin vr� the landscaping treatment, at cUA-de -sacs along the Vi 61a' Park.,`' L4ne4 provisions for decoriatrve masonry walls along the Loop R4411 accomodatinq Combined Pedestrian and Sicycle use on a ; ti PLANNING COMMISSIO'n, STAFF I tPORa .: �f Victoria Gro\�es Vipage March 27, lgk �,< Y+ Page f �{ singl? trail, eight feet wl�le 'through tie pasesrs; and providin 'additional flat usl_4�1,e area along the east /west greeiway trails: = r �f ,. IV. FACTS FOR.;FIXDINGS. The property t- . %?llequa in size and 'to shape ace��crnodate ' the proposcd land, -' uses: The .,area development p-�an in conjunction with the Conditions. of Approval is consistent with the Victoria,Planned Comm ftity and the general l` Plan. In"addition, the proposal will -not he` detrimental to the r public health, safety, or .welfare, or' Materially, injurious t ;� properties or improvements in the vicinity. V. RECObidEflDATION- Staff rectmmmends that the 'Planning ,Gomrrtis'sion approve the Arfm Development Plan fer Victoria Groves Village_; through adoption- the aitar„hed Resolhti6g.,frith Conditions. Respectfully sfibisitted, Rick Gomez 1 City Planner r,G:C civ Attachments: Exhibit *An v Victi&ia Land Use Map ' ExEi4bit., "G° -_,Area Development. Plan "C" <, Exhibit - Landscape Plan Exhibit ID" - Sections D. Exhibit "E" - Grading Plan -~ y �\ Exhibit nF" - Product' Prldtotypes " Exhibit IIGI 0 - $retches June 5, 19$5 Planni;ig C"ission Wbrkshop Minutes Resolution of Approval n • , v :1 0.'�i'S .z . _i�i.i 5��i "!•�a s. 10 wcict+u cnwes \\ 'fdCTOAIA GROVES �s [.AND USE i.MEN2 LM LU M3 3 �C ?Pi06J A ,( l LM a , cuk +BAs /)/ L L � 1m Ip[dQ4.K NiLAtt69P(x[ /CJYY'61,G4L QTR ;.. i7i �±}Jy2P1'i11litlI �MLOLR� tMtlt+dlL Q � O'1jRl1 L�ATnQKit COiW4�lH_ UNITY P.'..-AN A Planne a►zimuni#y In Ran ud� onga ., r l I'H CUCAMMCA AREA D ' � FLOP iI � ENT PLA , .LVt{wV�,tw t AN VICTO 11A.,��,GRb Es' {Rancho. Puc Ica, GYO ��SE�COlYS�TIKG GROUP ,, .�ipiLNAy`tO+l�..ttnw� ��..on.cnnc .+t �..�.+ TNACAL LOT D0.lx96t� riW-tl STFEV SFS.`7'0a LRCfOAA 00VE8 i/V6 t �9fAMFAY '— tit "� eIim ■ rec � �_ �` L Lw3mm ).}iST Lm 1}A!. K tl im1IEM■t'% =� Lf7ii -- 112iRi�tilif S.pF LI!! l.01i ;CS it. LLtt■M 410 yf l.; L r !st a is 1 LL'Wom" R —W O.Mv ilAK tit LS A >OlR YII, f110r &MV 410! max !1 m t■"Omf NtllE Law L t �M iFK ftmlQ di m itK ) M LTJC SAWL Ic _� t111rtN IOMf6iiYallWiTl010'.ltDii h • rI111fah�■t! �( JIB //„ At L It illy tCw�t�Crp�RT� llOt � mleu'raneeluL>r1,�r � I., -� r.u%r tOMh1o{ki C■mT X040 91 LON . l z 1 _..' ,.. y>��r�omefrtar>x CITY OF trEM- &MMA mss' - PLANNING MtMN M41i IT =.Z._ SCALE- toe- 7 Lilt, if l �.� 0701-02 0 3-27-85'-,PC Agenda 4'of 4 soctmor 1:: ��' k l ;J C� SCHn0L SITE LU 1 i I �e•••. T �'iaesr�'�'im►eoatoasrn� l '� wwo1e�.wwesfpAer �+4'�� ..175 may.+ 4eAM .� NORTH CITY Or ITEM: Yle.4-5P4A agej&S k• �YC O �CLTCA.IVIC�NG.A TI i Y E �r,x I,� I; A /_ rf3^' i� -_ .....__ � �.. .- .._ -s-fw VI\ MEMORANDUM DATE July 17, Mr TO- File FR(N5: Frank Dreckman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: VICTORIA GROVES PLANNING WORKSHOP OF JUNE 5*, 1584 (MINUTES) Greenr+ays�''Passeos .; The Planning Commission was concerned with the greenwaylpasseo system and indicated that providing greenways contiguous to the street system goes against the original intent of °tt,� Vigt•oria Specific Plan to provide greenways as a transition between 1,64 uses, The Planning Commission stated that if greenways,are to be located contiguous to the street that -they must be°3ubstantial in width. The fallowing is a list of additional recommendations by the Cissiort related to the greenway system.*` o Narrow greenways either on f;at grades or between slopes shall not,be allowed. The greenway system should open and close, providing opportualties for passivo recreation areas. Benches, light fixtures, ar4 other pedestrian related amenities should be provided.,, o Greenway should be primarily designed to divide land uses, densities, and product types, o Greenways sltQuld be located adjacent to higher density 'land uses to create additionO- open space amenities "to high 4zisity projects. o Greenways should include jagging trails, bicycle paths, and sidewalks designed to accommodate-various activities. o Greenwayslpasseas shall 4e' between .10 to BD feet in width. �` Memo to File ' Victoria Groves Pl'anniry Workshop duly 17, 1984 ._:Page 2 Victoria Park Lane - Equestrian Trails. ` The Planning Commission was concerned with g providin dequate equestrian related facilities contiguous to Vicj,k'ria Par Lane, and throughout the Victoria Planned Community and recemmend4,a,the following improvements: 4, o The Commission stated thatlithe equestrian tra717- provided' throughout the Planned Community should conform to City standards. L( o Trails should be 10 feet in width with. extruded concrete railing. o jl o The equestrian trail shall Irp located in the center median of Victoria Park Lane. o Equestrian trails r?urfacinl;r shall -1-e per City��standards R � (decomposed granitlA o The Commission recorte nd s that., ail Victoria Park Une trail designs be -� approved by Oe �Zquestrian Committee prior to scheduling the; nioisct, for Planning Commission review. ff o A 4% cross slope shall he provided on all Equestrian trails for drainage, urposes.,I i Victoria "irk Lane - Edge Treatnrent_/P_ai ,,) Design ^X ^ o The Planning Commissior('.�teeimnended that a_ 1' ed curb be provided at the edge cf`' curia Park Slane. y o The Commission recommended ,/;that ::he center median meander' between 30 and 50 feet. o The Commission rer.666ended IA4 'unduiations be, provided in ,the center median. 7n addition, tae '';Commission recommended ttF, t a grade differential ;,be •p'rovided, between travel lanes (north lane being higher than the south). - Victoria Par•;.< Lane: Bicycle Lanes o The Commission opted for establishing an 8 foot ,striped bicycle lane contiguous o, Victoria Park Lane, A striped lane shall be provided for both travel lanes. ,l..S v t //I► yj��y , `« CL J Victoria Grovj� Planning Workshop ` �f Jury 17, 19R4 - Page Victoria Park Lane: Sidewalks -= a Mean(d�irtng /undul3t »g sidewalk shall be provided, on both sides of st Far;; k ne. Street Right-of-Way Lucal Streets 1 - _ o The Plane -ing Commission recomm+ ded providing a standard 1 46 foot right -of -tray on all Tod, streets througnout � e Planned - Gommuniiy. Land pee The P'`zning Commission was very conCernud with the:4and use of the profos�d Victoria Groves development ii�n'a�,stated that.,ttie proposal, does not reflect „the . intent of the plan 'to orovide 'a variety of diffe7ent; density and housing types -. The:,Planning Commission recvaam-i.;eclhe following policie!Drelated to land use and design: o Greater variety shr+uld be .provided in both :.density levels' and product type. "$malia:r neighborhoods should be AdIhL provided with varying product types and densill.aes o Greater variation should be proided` -In the 4 -14 du /ac density range. The Planning Commission advzcat�,d using the 8 -14 du /ac range more liberally. o The Planning Commission' advocated using various density types as a_ transit =on from higher to lower density levels. o The Commission advocated using a variety of product types (attached and detached) whjch ii!Aude singl;,� familys . � - -- duplex, triplex; fourp"le: -, patio domes, and zero lot line homes. o treenways /passeos should be - provided to separate the ~ .'�riouS Lland use density types: - o The 'Commission adyQCated the inclusion- of 4reater amour'" of open space and amenities be provided betty er, land`,ui' ,c i° o The Commission recomnes;ded breaking the proposed jj,J `into i, sic (6) ,distinct neighborhoods, each with a distinct.= - '" product type and de: ,,sity range. LF JM /f1� I , ��= } ++.. il� irk k'y��},I,1e (d) Providing community trails between, yards Where grade changes can be "taken uVII. i 4vr $ - V Memo to Fi 1 July 17, 19P -- Page, -4 +` Gradiag + •: T The Planning"Coinemssion wad . conse�ned with the •grading plan for the proposed Victoria Groves project and recommended that the_City ;+s grading ordinance govern ,rading ;within the Victoria Planned Community,} the ' { p 'Commission • o Slopes should not exceed 6 feet in itprti.cal height at a Z:1 slope..., o- A level (flat? 15 foot distance iiiall bg established between the toe of any proposed slope (bottom) and, the proposed dwelling unit, ' o Natural appearing grade contours ':shall{' be used exclusi,:ely.;= (:ontour grading,techniquei shall b�a.ds�ed by` providing a variety of 3,1 1 � 2. .,,1 sibpes wfth roped edges, o Slope areas shall be useo''to define various neig�boncoods by providing, a transition zone between different density and product' types. o All grades shall be averaged throughout` each proposed ` t triilage. Grade shall be ,taken up" in a varietj _,of locations, not just in a faw, 1 1 Where slopes eyce6).` 8 feet in vertical height, additional mitigation measO, -' shall be provided to assure compatfb lity: Mitigation measures could include; (a) Requiring additional parcel area, (b) Requiring extensive lardscaping -C. \� ,(c) Requiring retaining watts. RESOLUTION ISO. , f A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING THE AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR VICTORIA GROVES k VILLAGE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF MILLIKEN, SOUTH OF HIGHLAND, AND NORTH OF 'THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILROAD TRACKS IN THE'VICTORiA PLANNED COMMUNITY. WHEREAS, on.the 31st day of January, 1985, a complete application was filed by The `Willi&l Lyon Company for review of the above- described project- and WHEREAS, on the '27th day of March, 1985, the .Rancho Cucamonga Planning Com "tssion held a meeting to consider the above - described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follr�rs: SECTION 1: Teat the fotliowing can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Victoria Planned Community Text "fJ and the purposes of the district in which t* use is 'f proposed; and 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will' not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially ir,urious to properties or improvements in the vicl`nity; and r 3. That the proposed use is in complia. -ce with each of the applicable provisions of th Victoria Planned Community Text and Development Code 4. That the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. SECTION 2: That Area Development Plan for Victoria Groves Village is approved subj ^t to the ftnllowing conditions, PLANNING DIVISION: 1. A Tree Removal Permit shall be submitted for review and approval prior to approval of the rough grading plan, A detailed site plan shall accompany said 'tree Removal Permit showing the precise location, size and type of all trees on the subject property. Said plan shall take into account: "the proposed grading, -trees that are to be retained, triwing methods, and where new trees will be planted for replacement of, removed trees. ,j .j Planning Commission Resolution Victoria Groves Page #2 2. Landscape tk'':atment at the end of cul-de-sacs alon R Victoria Park lane shall becdesigned to provide open views into the culw de- sacs., �t 3. Decorative maso r �" wa, waLtbe &,r J provided along the "Loop �} Road ". Details/ 3�ral t -be° .4 corresponding tentative tract map applications. tf 4. Along the east /west trails the*`flat �usale open s�ppce areas shall be increased by'adjusting slope configuraY.ionD ndhr the use of low level retaining walls. Recreation amenities such as exercise stations or b,, °pches are encouraged. Details sha11_be provided with the corresponding tentative map applications.- Qt '. A minimum eight foot wide improved surface shall be provided along the interior ,/paseo trails to prOide for safe and convenient pedestrian and bicycle traffic. , ENGINEERING DIVISION I A. Streets: AL Ah 1. Two means of access, � shall be provided to each tract as it develops. It shall have a minimum 26' AC paved width within a 40' wide right- of -wo- 2. All knuckles and cu1�,, -scc 'bulbs shall be designed_to City Standards. 4 4 1 . 3, The foliowing north /south street connection from Highland 1 , "J! Avenue to Base Line shall be constructed with the first tract: a. Portion of the Loop Road from Highland Avenue to Victoria Park Lane, 26' AC paved width within a 40 - foot wide right -of -way, +\ v b. Victoria Park Lane from Loop Road to Milliken Avenue, both `oadbeds, and c Milliken Avenue from Victoria Park rLarte to�Base Line, an 18 foot wide AC paved lane on both sides of . the medi art. If the , Developer decides to construct P Milliken Avenue full width, he shall be'credit6� or reimbursed from Systems Development Fe'e -� nor the cost of the west half from -Base Line R'aa to the ,� ,railroad'. . Planning Commission Resolution -Victoria Groves Page 43 rl - ., TKe right -o' way on the Loop Road shall be increased to include "%- 5ki�eet,berind the outside edge of the sidewalk. it 5. A 4�pcis€ alignment for the transition of Highland Avenue to me�.t the existing bridge to the west shall' be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to scheduling of the first Tract Map for Planning Commission's approval. S. Drainaget� I. Ail storm 'drain connections to Deer Creek f�hannel shall be sub�,`ct to the approval of the Flood Control District. The tota3 number should be minimized, 2, k rerisgd storm drain master piarc for the "entire area shall be completed by the Developer's Engineer and approved by the City Engineer,and the Flood Control District prior to scheduling of ,If the first tract map for Planning Commission approval. ,3; A drainage report identifying required ktormr drain:;facilities \ for each tract when submitted will be required and shall be approved by 'the City Engineer prior to scheduling for Planning Commission approval. Each plan stall provide for 100 year overflows. C. Grading Approval from„the Flood Control District and the Southern Pacific Railroad are required for the proposed grading on the property. The approvals shall' be obtained` prior to submittal to the Planning Commission of the Tract Maps effecting those areas. APPRdVED,AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY /OF MARCH, 985. PLANNING CIMMISSION"OF THE CITY OF. 1O1 , RANCHO CUCA . 1 ` BY. - -1 Dennis L. Stouts C.bairman I ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary -- :' CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA-liq STAFF REPORT r' _ � r sr. m _4 d y L DATE: March 27, 1985 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission rROM- Rick Gomez, City Planner ` BY: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 85 -01 - An amendment to the Rancho Cucamonga ,Development Code, Title 17 of the Municipal Code, regarding Master Plans. I ABSTRACT: The City Council has directed. Staff to prepare an amendment to the Development Code to clarify the intent and application of,.the Master Plan process. The purpose of this report is to explairt',_'he ttached Ordinance amAnding Section 17.20.30, Master Plan Werlay Nstrict. a � I1. BACKGROUND: The Development Code requires preparation of a conceptuaT- Master Plan. for all areas specifically designated (with an asterisk) on the City's General Plan and Development Districts Map, Although there is no minimum or maximum size for these Master Plan areas, typically the Master Plan designation occurs in lame' undeveloped areas such as those areas around Chaffey College'. The Master Plan process is intended to address the unique i% characteristics of certain areas and to assure harmony between proposed and existing uses. The; Master Plan process .also s -- — facilitates a comprehensive circulation and drainage system for a neighborhood to avoid piecemeal development. In essence, Master Planning means "planning ahead" and looking beyond the limits of a particular property to solve circulation, drainage, and neighborhood compatibility problems. On la( er parcels, a variety of housing product types may 'be proposed by a Master Plan to deal with site constraints or opportunities and to promote neighborhood .compatibility with surrounding uses. Pursuant to the Develo!tMent Code Absolute Policies, proper transition of density or iO%ensity is required from adjacent areas of lesser density or inte4lity. For example, in the Lynhaven apartment project by Lan,B0tsen interests, the project site was located across the street from future Low Medium Residential densities, therefore, the project was designed with ITEM Nc' —` � PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Environmental Assessment DCA 85 -02 I. March 27, 1:985 r`7i Page 2 fourplexes as a transition to the Ada and three story apartments to the south. The Master Plan process \vay also facilitate discussion F of aitfier ,design techniques to prov kde transition ,of density, such as, open space setbacks, dense landscaping, . architectural scale and mass, grade changes, etc... further, large scale master planning of areas of 50 plus acres may be appropriate to ensure variety of housitt.,�;,,,praduct type and architectural style to discourage monotony <. and a.ggo housing needs `of a divergent population as encour'aye by tie ity's General Plan Housing Element Policies. III. aROr S` Tate (fi e=? Pi,,ft process is used in, conjunction with a t ec e;t` p nt application (e.g,., tentative tract, conditional use permit). Therefore, the crii- ria for .evaluating the Master Plan are threefold: (1) absolute policies for residential projects, (2) ' development standards, and (3) design guidelines as_spec:fied in the City's Development Code. The proposed revisions to the Master Plan Overlay strict, as {� shown in the attached revised Ordinance, are intend), to clarify and Expand the language regarding the following: a. Applicability of the master Plan requirement to specific parcels (17.20.030 -B), b. Master Plan content (17.02.030 -C2), and c. Approval process for Master Peens (17.02..030 -02). IV. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff recommends that the Planni g ommission make the ings required pursuant to Division 13; find Chapter 6, Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code that would- not require subsequent or supplemental Environmental Impact; Rcport and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. This finding is based upon the fact that Development Code amendment: implements the existing Goals .and Policies of the:General Plan which were fully analyzed with `regard to environmental impacts during the General Plan EIR. V., .CORRES'PONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a Public Hearing a D aii Report newspaper. To date,, no can— ndeece either -- Ufa or against the proposed amendment has been receiv e PLANNING-COMMISSION STA : REPORT Environmental Asse.ssment t DCA 85 -0I March 27, _1985 Page 3 1 VI. RECOMMENDATION. If the Planning Commission determines that the � proposed amendment can further implie► nt the Goals and Polices of the General Plan and Development Code, adoption of the atteched resolution recommending, approval of the proposed wend" and issuance of a Negative Declaration to the City Council would be appropriate, §pe y aubmittedC ` City Planre(,,J) RG:I)C ns Attachment,', 'Initiy Study, Part II r �,J�A\ -Res I uiion �1 toincL a \ L Al J - f 1, CITY OF RAYCHb CUrtAMh MT 11 — naTIA7L s £L'l3Y ETYL*IMMMM;L CaEcmsi DATE- I. E- E1_AS` MnA\ Me S (Explanation of all "}yes" and "Maybe' answers are required on attached sheets). YES IMPE NO I. Soils and Ceolosrr< Will the propoY;4l have signirzcaW4 results in. a.. Unstable groundconditionsar in changes in ~ geologic relationships? b. Disruptions, displacements`, eomp:tian or burial the of soils e. Change in topography or ground surface rf contour intervals? d. The destruction, covering or modification J' Of any unique _1 geologic or physical features? re. Any potential increase in wind or water < erosion of soils, affecting either on or uff site eonditons? ;, f• Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? __ f g. Exposure of people or property to geologic L hazards such as earthquakes, landslides:, sand— / slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? / h. An increase in the rate of extraction iu,,i `se of any mineral resource? Z. Hydr d\ < Will the groposal� have significant results ins , As VA ---4$ V 3a ° sin cu rents, Or the coarse of direction of flomiat srrwm. rivers, or e;&emerat sire. b. Cbamges in absorp tim Latest patterns. or -the rate and ate£ Of surface water c- Alterations to the course flow or 007 flood Sa:a suer a* F of srateSl e: waters, or alty alteration, Of ac 'der quality? fa Altera:tiou of ter chxracte= stfcs? • Change In, the Qa% ii ty of . either throe& darecr a&utioms er Ulth- dr s3 or tbrovalt laterzereacr with as aquifer h- The Tedactio in the o stt iZraiable for ��2C t�iigm? F►�Se J Sore of people ;o r soperty cis water related hazards such as flfl0 or Seim? sai a _ � Vili the prop U"& icapt_, results :in: a. Constant ar periodic air emissions froa mobile% � or indirect sources? statIDQ= r sources? Y DeteriOratlm of aghieat air quality and,for Interference Vith the attainment of applicab2e air amity standards? conditions. affectiot affect; air mmeme It. ma3tCre `� • . -. '. or temperature? Blota M F'lotaa Will the dal page si$aaflcmt awaits °• In: 1i t t a- Change In the cuara -mer smics 4Yf Inclodin diversity. aiwtri�ow. or �" of aUY species of Plants? 'J { , a of the Ombars of gay unique or eadmeared Spec," of 'tumet3 V c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of plants into an area? d. Heductiou in the potential for agricultural production? Fauna, bill the proposal`have significant resulta In: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or jumbers of any species of animals? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c.. Yntraductidn of new or di,- ruptive species of aaiwa2.s into an area, ar ress ,-It in a barrier to the migration ar movement of animals? d Deterioration or removal: -of existing fish or vildli£ habitat? ;` 5. Foou?ation. Vill the Prapas"ve significant remelts in: a. Vill thefpraxasay. alter the location, distri- bution, n ,-- y,'chi� �txsity, or growth rate of the hraan uiatiost Of an area? b- 'g n the proposal affect existing housing, or cse4 !e a demand for additional housing? 6. Socio- Ec0000"c Factors. $,Till, the proposal have si8aiiscaat results ins Change in Iceal err regional sotto= economic characteristics, Inca ro-Dercial diversity, rate, pr values? tY: tax rata, and pro�se�rty b. Will project costs be equitably distributed Ong Project beneficiaries, i.e., 'buyers, tam payers or project users? 7. land use and Pl=niza consi eLatians. will the praposaZ have sight.iicant results in? A- A wubstantial alteration of the present 'or per. iaa& ,Use of an area? Page 3 YES `L3y3E0 ter? b.l' A cuaflict with age ,desiguations. q� �ectives, policies4 or adopted[ plans of any � �vernsaent �. mctities� al C- An impact Upoa the qulaity or quatttiLYA?,of to ao tiv "�..."�' i Page 4 YES ,tsY3r S. Transportation. Will the proposal hove S'Snificant" results in a. Generation of substantial additioA;_1 Vehicular movement'. L b. E!Tfeots on existing stteets, or demand for new street construction ?' C. c:amants on ex3sti13 parkiag facilities, or demand for _ new parking? d. Substantial impact upon existing transporta- tion systems? 1 -1 e. alterations to present patterns?of circula' tion or movement.oY people andlor'goods? f. Alterations to or effect, +.on present and — —% potental seater- borne, rail, mass transit or air traffic? 1 g. Irereases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or. pedestrians? : 9. Cultural Resources. win the g opussi ha••c significant results ins a. A diytuzbanca to the integl itv of archaeo,.ogical, Paleontological, and /or historical reoources? 10. He -Ith. Sa'aFety, and h1jisance Factors. idill the proposal hati:g significant iestts in,. a. Creation 6)0� any health hazard or pot hazard? ential health b� Exposure of bo Ie t F;= P o potenr�isi health hazards? r. A risk of � expi3sion or release of hazardous - -- —. substances in the west of an accident? s d. An increase ir_ the number of 'individuals �- or species of vector or parhenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such- organisms? e., increase in existing noise I eels? f. Exposure of people to Potentially dangerous` noise levels? }� g• The creation of ob.; ecti"ja odors? 0 ') h. An inet"sae in light or glary: ` Page 5 1r YES 'i]"3E NO 11- Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant results in: J; a. The obstruction or degradation ofa,,ny scenic 11 vista or view ?; L: the erPation of an aesthetical?,k offensive /r site. c. A conflict with ,te objective ot� designated or potential scent /f((a corridors? , 12. Utilities and Public ifervices. Will the proposal have a significant ne -��a i�'oir new systems, or alterrtions to the fdtlowing: a. Electric powel? Ik b. Natural or packaged gas? '•;:f c. Communications System's? � d. Water supply:. e.> Wastewaci r facilities? E .. _! f. Flood control st-uctures? g. Solid waste facilities? h. Fire protection? I. Police protections per✓'. J. Schools? > / k. Parks or other rL�rreational faci3ities? TT/ 1. MaintenancP4 of public facilities, including J roads and Hood control facilities? M_ Other governmental services? 13. Enerev and Scarce kesources. W f.1 the proposal,_ have significant results in: a. Use of substantial or excessive;" �uel or energy? ' b< Substantial, increase in demand upon existing sources. of Energy ? - r c. An increase in the demand for development of t new sources of energy z" d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumption of non- renewable forms of energy, when feasible renewable: sources of energy are available? s = tS Fagf-- b _ YES FAM *�0 ^�Sabstantial e. depletion of any nonrenewable or scarce 'natural resource? 14;' 23andatory Findings of Si¢nificance« al. Does the project` ave therpotential.to llt the quality of th} degrade eatvira(( e.3t, substantially reduce the habits of fist,ior wildlife species, muse s fish ¢ ild}ife, population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal commun[ty, reduce the number or,, restrict the range , of a rare or �= endangered plant or a�a�mal or eliminate 0 E Important examgxes of the major Periods of California history or grehisCO ry? Ir b. Does the project save the potential r to achieve ` short -term, to the dsadYntage of 'long -Germ, environmental, goals? (A short -term impact on the environment is One which occurs in a relatIvely' brief, definitive period of time'while Jong- term impacts Will endufq well Into the future) (n c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited,; bti.t cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable' means that tDe incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed t. in connection with the effects of past projects,; and probable future projects). — d..;Doea the project have environmental effects wh�yh will cause substantial adverse:eifects w on human beings, either directly or indirectly? ZI. DISCUSSION OF EMRODiE3TAI tVALtrATION p'i,e.(; o3- affirmative ensw rs .to the above questions plus a =diszussion of proposed mitigation lmeasuresy. If s t� o Page 7 III. DETEMMIVATIOY 7ef sisi f this initial evaluation; k< d the propos ed project COULD NOT nave a significant effect e enviresment, and a NEGATIVE DECLA-RtTIO;t, will be prepared. I find that although the proposed ro'ect cculd a a significant effect o the anvirOnMamt, there�a .�i7not be a ,sign rYcant effec this ase because the mitiigation ms,sures das�a� �ed on an attache have been added to the` pr' act. A'i�G TIVE DECLARA7�O T WIL . FE r'REPARM' . vi \ I find the proposed project MAY have a si g' ni.fic 1 envirnment{? and an EWIRO t effect an the .`N'I L ORT s qui.red. i - ` Date V ! Title F v O f pp r« s Y' t w F / RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THc RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMM �SION (s RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT \\85 - 01, AMENDING 'TITLE 17 OF THE MUNICOAL CODE, CHAPTER 17.20, OVERLAY DISTt�ICTS, REGARDING ASTER PLANS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held duly advertised public hearings pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code; and r WHEREAS, the P1ar ding Commission finds it n6bessary to clarify the requirements for Master P , i SECTION 1: The Rancho � ,jcamonga Planning Commission finds %twit the proposed Development Code Amerdneitt 85 -01 is an ,;implementation of the General. f Plan goals and policies and that the General Plan Env ronmeicta Impact report adequately covers any potential significant adverse impacts. Further, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental impact report is required pursuant to Division 13, Chapter 6, Section 21158 of the Public Resources Code. Specifical';-_ he Planning Commission findss: A. No substantial changes are proposed in'any goals or policies which would require major revisions. to the EIR. 3 B. No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken. C. No, new information on the project has bt,come available. 4 SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga; Planning Commission has found -4hat . this project will- not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance a Negative Declaration on March 27, 1985. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESr,4VED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of .the City of Rancho Cucamonga-,hereby recommends that the City Coo -ncil approve and adopt the attached Ordinance .amending Title 17, Development Code, Chapter 17.20, of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. 2. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related, mater %al hereby- adopted by the Planning, Comm scion shall ' be forwarded to the City Council. _, Resolutioh No. Page 2 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27th DAY OF`MARCH, 1985. i PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE:CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMAGA ° BY: ; Dennis L tout, Chairman* j ATTEST•, c.c Gomez, Deputy ecre',ary I, Rick Comez, Deputy Secretary of the - Planning Commission of the City of ` Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by (vKi Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of March, 1985, fiy the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS. i CY ORDINANCE NO., AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 27, SECTION 17.20.030 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE; REGARDING MASTEW FLAN REQUIREMENTS The City Council of the City t Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 2: That Section 17.20. 0, Master Plan Overlay District, is hereby am7;fined to r as f ]lows: Section 17.20.:30 Master Plan Overlay District A. Purpose. The purpose of the Master Plan Overlay District—, is to establish procedur,;�s to address- cite Special nr unique needs or characteristics of certain areas designated b)P the General_ Plan or Specific Plar � and. to `S harmonious assure a relationship between the r'Frating` and nity proposed use, and to coordinate and promote tlk -71urt improvement efforts of both private and putl1t' res. B. Applicability J 1. All areas specially designated as Master Plans on the lard Use Plan of the General Plan shall be Considered ; areas %here preparation of a conceptual Maste* Plan shall be considered mandatory. 2.: Any other areas may'_ be considered areas where preparation of a conceptual Master Plan if in the opinion cf the City PlannsrC`,he application or project site involves unusual side ievelopment constraints or unique characteristics; or raises questions of., -_ development policy substantially more significant than - generally pertain to applications. 3. Ali development within a Master Plan Overlay District :a shall comply with the intent of Ma%tRr Plan as approved by the Planning Caotn> ssion. U&kver, it is not the intention of the mas er planning process io limit the flexibility to develop alternative solutions consistent with the intent of the Master Plan. 4. There shall be no minimum or maximum area requirement for a Master Plan Overlay District. t Ordinance No. Page 2 C. Administration 1. Establishment of Overlay District. The Master Planned District try be applied in combination with any development district pursuant to Section 17.02.060, Amendments, A Master Plan Overlay District shalt be designated upon the Development District Map, by an 1 asterisk ° *" after the reference number identifying 1 each base district', for a1 areas designated by the General Plan as required by all,, City Planner. t -2. Master Plan Requirements. Mtere required, by Section / 17#20.0308, a conceptual ftster Plan shall be s.,bmaitted for approval - tog ecfter with any development application, and considered as a part of, unless specifically exempted as provided for by Section 17.06.030A. Applications for a Master Plan shalt be fi °ied with the Planning Division in a manner prescribed by tf ;� City Planner. At mair~ims , Master Plans shall ind�Zate,through graphics and tit, conceptual building locations, conceptual subdivision layout in residential areas, overall circulation, points of ingress and egress to both public and t private streets, parking lot layouts, 'concept�aal grading and drainage, areas to be used for landscapi +tg'' and plazas, and pedestrian circulation. Areas : - .,itended for common use, such as shared access, reciprocal parkin or pedestrian plazas shall also be identified. In a dition, a statement of archit�-�.al intent and/or tonceptuai e`�vations shall be su ttted to indicate how the architectural concepts including style, variable product types,, forms, balk, height, orientation, and materials relate to other buildings or projects within the planning area. Further, the Master Plan shall indicate implementation responsibility for and phasing of necessary rr improvements. The ; onceptual Master Plan shall be reviewed for consistency with the pu, of this section, Absolute Policies contained of 17.08.050, design guidelines of the base district, and t\ the criteria contained in Section 17,06.010. D. Authority. 1. The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing on � each application for a Master Plan. The hearing shall be held�simultaneously with thy development application for which thv- Master Plan was prepared, and shall be set and notice given as prescribed in elµ Section 17.02.110 Public Hearings. Upon completion of C t. # \ + \ �. • µif q Ordinance No. -Page 3 the public hearing, the Planning Commission shall: approve, conditionally approve, or deny the Master Plan. If the Planning Coaanission denies the Master Plan, their decision shall be finai unless appealed to the City Council within ten (10) callendar days (see Section 17.02.080). 2. The Planning Commission may alter the Master Plan and impose such restrictions and conditions as it.may deem necessary to ensure that the Master Plan will be in harmony with the intent and purposes of this section and with the adopted plans and policies of the City and /or guidelines as approved by the Planning' Commission. E findings. , The Planning Commission shall matte the same findings required for approval of the related development application as set forth by this Code. SECTION 2• The City Council finds that Development Code Amendment 85 -01 is an7i��eentation of the General Plan goals and policies and that the General Plan Environmental Impact Report adequately covers any potential significant adverse impacts. Further, the City Council finds; that no subsequent or supplemental envfrZimental impact report is required .= 'suant to Division 13, Chapter 6, Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code. Specifically, the City Council finds that; " A. No substantial changes are proposed -in any goals or'` policies which would require major revisions to:,,the EIR. 8. No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken. C. No new information an the project has become available. SECTION 3: A Negative Declaration is hereby adopted for this Development ode Amendment, b6ed upon the completion and findings of the Initial Study. SECTION 4. The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, , a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of nt o, Calif rnia, and circulated in the City of,,' Rancho Cucamonga, California. Orn�ance `t�� Page 4 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1985. ` MES: f 1! NOES: ABSENT: 1 , i im D. Mt a s, yGr ATTEST Beverly A. Authelet, Cify ClerR Y i rid 9: � o