HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985/05/08 - Agenda PacketV AR
0701 -02 o 5 -08-85 PC Agenda o
1C�
via 1
..,r•� , e
CITY OFJ
A,
C
P�'L j
I]T AC�7-i�CT� lTC�UCAMON
TTt� Tf1
F.L._r.C�.L�fLVLl;\Tt� A k.. MMIS, -roN
AGENDA t-
t 1977
WJfDNESDAY MAY 8, 1985. 7:00 p.fn.
LIONS PARK CO "Y CEI M
L, J
9161 BASS Ydi4B
11"CII0 CIICAA'tONGA, CALIFORNIA
L
Pledge of Allegiance
II.
Roll can
` ={
l
CommissionerBsrkei'' Commissioner Rempel l
Commissioner Ctdtiea Commissioner Stout
Commissioner McNiel~
III.
"oun emenfs :t
W.
Consent Calendar
file following Consent Calendar k�zs ��aa. expected to be routine
and non-controverstai. They wilZz;4'actO on by the Commission at
one time without discussion. If a concert[ aver any item,-
it should be removed for discussi6i .
A. TIME EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83 -10
L OF GOD EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH -
Loc+ ar ted at §513 Bwsiness Center Trivet Suite J.
B. TIME EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82 - -24 - '
McINTYRE - Tempora_ay Empire Banff located at 8505 Haven
Avenue.
C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT' AYD `DEVELOPMENT
R.EWW 84 1t - CROV DER - The development of nine U9
ie—p ''^ ch and development Buildings totaling 139,650 square
,7
feet on 9.16 acres 'of land in the Industrial Park (Subarea 6)
category located at the southwest corner of 6th Street and.
Utica Avenue -- APN 21"8 -7 j
D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT'' I AND DEVELOPMENT
V W 8 -2J -THE IiTLL CONE Y -The developlrtent o d t
`)
an e":zht buiialrig industrial park complex totaling
approxiti ely 104¢ ;square feet on 7.4 acres of lead in tai
'
IndSLStrI '"iat: ZiSa ri,G��`fir�. mbarea 11'12') Ioeated,on t'he ea$t S2t�. �
of 111 l iTi an, south of 6th Street - APH, 229 -261 -- 58.
k
f
3X 'wE —:-a _ ..rei— ficxe. a�L� -..pry
_4 iii. ia_17�r .: ,. . .r ... .:.ik3.i 8aiX- e.$ac�.ai��'•
", is Hearing')
The l following items are public ^ hear'ia gs icq<<Wl -i�jch cnrtcerned
individuals may voice their opinion of the re
la le P aect Please'
wait to be recognized by the Chamrnidn and addr,�e :-'R %i Comtnissicn
by stating your name,�mid address. All such opinions shalt be
lim to 5 mina
i4 es p!i individual for each project.
i E. EiyTYIRON�4- EX3TAj ASSPSSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT
DIS'T'RICT AMEND iYI P 85-0 - SQOYMAN - A
3ev lopment District Amendm ant from Medium Residential
(8 -14 du /ac) to Low Medium R4sidential (4-8 du /ac) for 9.75
acres of land located at the northeast corner of Archibald
Avenue and ..Highland Aven9p - APM 201- 252 -23, ,25, 26.
(Related File: TT 12914)
F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TE:4TATIVE TRACT
12914 - ;iGHLAND VILLAGE -_The_ develapment of 73 single
etached homes on 9..15 acres of land in the Medium
Residential District (8-14 dulac), (Low Medium Development
Distriet Amendment request pending), Iocated on the
northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Highland - APN
201-252-23,15,26., (Related File: DI)A 8'5-02)
0. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT 8'146 - CALIFORNIA R&TIREMENT VILLAS3lNC.
TAe developrment of a 104 unit retirement hotel for senior
;citizens with other services provided,, such as dining faciL'ty,
recreation and exercisiyA fanility, arts and eraf ts, barber and
beauty shops, on 1.76 pAres of land in the Office Professional
District, ioepted at o(le soutUside of Pase Line, 700 ,feet east \�
of CarneliamrAPN 20- 031 -19.
H. ENVIRONMENTAL: ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE "
PE&-T 1'r 85 -05 - PAULEY - The development of $mini
wareiIouse, faeility consisting of 7 buildings and a caretaker's j
quarters totaling 125,730 square feet on 4.45 acres of laid in
i the Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial Distriet,(Subarea 9)
located at the northeast corner of Utica Ar.,Wo and 8th
Street,- APN 209- 143 -04.
J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND Cd.+DITIONAL USE
PERMIT 85 -07 - I ISHER The construction of an auto repair
J building with office totaling 3167 square feet on .25 .acres of
land in the General Commercial District, located on the north
side of Base Line, on the west side of ;Roberds - APN 202
092 -009.
J. NTAL -ASSESSMENT ANN) VARIANCL�
FISs�R n A reotiest to permit era lntliime along time NCe�� r '.�.��'
kit J side- d�`subieet prcipecty on .25 acres of larncl an, trh�•�e�era'1,�
Commercllal %2strmet Iocated tin the north side of Basee, .,,
- "' roust side of Rober+9s - r��?f 2U�$- 092- tii}9. � , ''
L
K, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 9084-
FORE2MLMORTGAGE CORPORATION - A division 61 20.9
acres into one parcel M the Hillside Residential Development c'
District, Iocated north of Almond Avenue, west of, Big Free
Road - APN 200=051 -06.
L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS.MIENT "AND CONDITIONAL USE
EkM]tT 84 -16 _ ASS'URED- MINI^STOHAGE Construction of
A ` mini- storage development, with caretaker's quarters,.
atal ng 32,860 ,square feet on 144 acres of land in the
;l Industrial Park Oubarea &j District, located on the north side
f,t 4th Street, east Turner Avenue - APN 210 - 371 - -A3
'10
j! (CUntinued from Mareh3, 1885 meeting.} ;
M<
VARIANCE 84 -02 - ASSURED MINI= STOR —LAGL -,--k request to
allow a reduction in the required X596 Mil imm landscape
coverage in order to construct a m nj-storaae,faciiliity on the
north side of 4th Streeel, east of Turner Avenue, in Subarec &,
Industrial Park designation APN 210- 371 -103, (Continued
from March 18, 19$5 meeting,)
1 VL \ \New Business
N. 9NVIIiOI+IMEIT7'AL ASSESS. NT AND DEVEI,tiPMENT
REYIEiW $$ 15 - AIMURED NUNI- STOR.ACM w Construction of
e mini- storage development tot
aiing 40,112 sq. ft. on 1.44
acres of land' in the Industrial, Park (Subarea 6) District
located on the north side of 4th Street, east of Turner. Avenge
210-371-03.
VIL Direetor's Reports
0. , LAND USE ANALXSIS
P. REVIEW OF ' EQUESTW AN TRAIL RE&7JMEMLNTB F. ffif
T NT E TRACT 12902 - MOLLANn PACIFIC - A
custom, lot subdivision of 41 lot, on 39.7 acres o Ind %p, the
Very Lot Residential District (less than 2 du/se), IoQmted on
the west side of Hermosa Avenue, south of Almond Street
APX 201- 0:1 -S, S, 25, 263,,,3S, and 30.
VM Pabiie Commews
i Thfa. is the time and pkace for the general public to Address the
Commission. Items to be discussed here are those Which do not
.. already rxppear on this itgQrtddz. y
M Adjournment
' The Planning Commission has',,aciogted Administrative Re
tlF set an 11 p:"�rr. tdjQUrrtt tetet time. if IteM0
£ tixile, they shall be lieatti ottly avitti' the aonserit
i a �
s
11
„ { V"ICINITY
a
it a
�'�di tNg+ss � (' y2�++1ea uCtS1�.�Tlaea+ s
[ r
RS —
CA�'FFY
smww a i'?���'''•.. 5wl.nit
■ Vd $
Y = a — �MMMINf • f
RAH6nl uSr .sf +Li ■ s '� e?
t
a
aN ■ 1�
► ► ►YYY r
i n
t
0A � ;EM •• . wNMN =w� , .
CUC <NONC<- G'UisYt COUNTY AECIOMJt( PAiK
OA7 <AIII /NtRN<7tONiL - ALtPORT
qqy OP
,dpi c Ct rY � zi��
_. �3'n3.a.•'?". _� _ ..:.�? l �x,...s�w1�:....y..�F &atE'c � .. ._ .�. 7k�'ai�. ,t..
i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMQNGA
ST"F REPORT.
C 1
O O
DATE: May 8, 1985 1977
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Rick Gomez,, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR,:CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 81 -10 - LAMB OF
OD EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH Loca ?d at 9 Business
Center Drive, Strite J.. / v ti•
(r
BACKGROUND: The Lamb of- >God Lutheran Church took over the Conditional
Use Perm t -81 -10 issued',for Gala Fellgwship located at 9513 -d Business
Center Drive in the Cucamonga Business?}ark. Conditional Use Permit -81-
10 was approved on June 10, 1981-and currently expires on June 10,
1985. In order for the Planning 'Commission to consider. granting an
extension for this Conditional Use Permit .a'�ubli;; @@arng has been
advertised for the May 22, 1985 agenda. The public ling is necessary
for the Planning. Commission to modify the Conditions of Approval
relating to;the expiration of this Conditional Use Fermit.
RECOMh0DATION: It is rscommenaed that the Planning "Commission continue
thi I item to the May, 22, 1985 agenda to conduct: the public, hear tng.
Res ctf sub tted,
i
jt ck ez
ity nn
G, :DC :ns
Attachment: Letter from Applicant
Exhibit "A° - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Site Play
,.7
v
:s ITEM A
F
.f
' Lamb ®f, God Evang eUeal Lutheran Church
' 9513 Business Censor Gr Ve a Cucamonga. Business Park
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 . 714 -98C -1074
March 12, 1985
Community Development Department fr �/j,
Planning Division i9i y?r�
City of Rancho Cucamonga
9320.Baseline Road, Suite C f�t
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701
Ddar Sirs:
In July of 1982 Lamb of God Evangel cal Lutheran Church tonic over the
Conditional Use - Permit (CUP 81 -10) that had been granted to the'facilities
at 9513 -J Business Center Drive in the Cucamonga Business Center. In
March of 1983 we applied and on April 27, 1983 we received a twc=- year,
extension on that permit. The permit now runs until Jude 10, 4985.
We are again applying for another two year extension on the CUP 81 -10
for the facilities at 9513 -J Business Center Drive, The reasons for
thin request are;
1) We now have property en wbich we hope to build. -% our permanent
facilities.. The property wh:U'u, is at 9212 Baseline Road was
•purchased by the church in ,Cctoher of 1983.
2) The policy of the Missiont\Board under which we aperate is that a'
building is not immediate' constructed, but the congregation is
given time to regroup and mow aft- U'-�he initial purchase of pae
property.
3) We are now at the sta6e where we are discussing with our Mission
Board the next phas% %which is planning the overal Master Plan for'
the property anu,hen the construction of the initial unit.
A letter is incinded from the District Mission Board explaining
this.
4) Once this approval is given by the Mission Board we will be engaging
an architect, havix:g plans drawn,.mp and submitting them to your
office for approval:
Thus we do request from you at this time an extension on the present
CUP. If you need any more information or have any questions please feel
free to contact the pastor of Lamb of God, Pastor Glenn E. Wenzel
at 980- .4794.
Thanou� {
James R
Pastor Glenn E. Wenze) Harrist Chairman, Lamb of God
9912»Baseli tie.,Road
Rancho Cucamonga -,A 9170,
t 713- 9804794 (Nome)
ARIZONA "CALIFORNIA DISTRICT WISCONSIN EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN SYNOD
CALIFORNIA MISSION DISTRICT Caiifomia.a Nevada + Hawaii
PASTOR ROBERT HOCHMUTH March 4s 1985.
Chalrman -
783a Center Parkway �... -
Secramanto, CA 95823
(418)362.2476 Planning Department
PASTOR.JOELC, GERLACH- City of Rancho Cucamonga CA
. minion cowhaalor• CMDMa
1851 Hampahke Road - -
Tustin. CA 92660
.(714)W -7465 Rer Lamb of God Lutheran Congregation
' ?ASTOR DONALD SEIFERT
Saeratary
3744 Cantinela Avenue ~
. Los Angola& CA SW66. This is to affirm: that Lamb of God Co
(213) ass-3838 ngregation, Rancho Cucamonga,
is sponsored and subsidized as a home mission congregation of'the
MILTOISCHLITTENNART Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod.
Lay Reoraaentativa• GBHM -
11348 Vannon Avenw
Chrno,CA81710 As such it is eligible for funding for a building p
g pro'J ect up to
(714) 628-1764
4500 square feet from the Church Extension Fund of -nur Synod.
MR. EUOENEott" SON The present :-house and site on Base Line Coa>i _we4•e acquired under
La"Rep`°aelOrIVe policies of our Board for Howe Missions which administers the
6308 Crynnei Odve
Ean Jos4CA85123 Church Extension. Fund - -
(40e) 2275198 _
PASTOR M. C.NITZ We anticipate that the congregation wt11_be a] 1r fora royal
District Presiden :. PP y r9 pp
13471 Newhove &{real of the next phase of its facilityprogr�.<m (ordiinaril�y -,a multi- Garden purpose building) in the next few months"..
_ t714I &34.5617 9)
We are willing to provide blueprints of other projects in Califor-
nia. funded under the guidelines.of, our home misi soi program. The
most recent are in Yorba Linda, Pgnryn. Petaluma„ i,Ind Modesto.
Infiprogress are Canyon Country and Victorville'
Completed facilities under' 'these guidelines are in Carlsbad,,
Tanta Barbara, San Jose, Sacramento, Concord to name a few of
the total of over 40.
The S „cramento site is similar to the site of Lamb of God congre-
gation in Rancho Cucamonga. A copy of the plot plan for facilities
under our program iS available for your inspection. You will note
that it calls for stages of construction.
We will be eager to provide additional information that may be
of value. ,We understand that this statement is to be used for
the purpose of demonstrating the congregation `s °''backing” in the
interest of securing an extension of its present use permit.
Y
ct:DMB
c GBHM
Cong. /�" v
O U r E —
I1 Ll.1 �
i -
9 07 a l
9565 9607
TEW P-11
Id .rr QY • A�[A•c.
A•+ec M ¢ uf4 •S1J�J+
l.wv1. /r l�� •0.01YYJJ•TN
.w..aetmJ �uustt. a..,+�t_s.....�yaf -- >�} 1••ioC.
zacmori of Tm Ucsrr usm BY ' - (Ip1CtD :HN C'
IIJC�iFT01�i OF PAI2MC SPa(M A 7MABLE
FOR EVENING AND SMMy mop , TTC USE
NORTH
CITY or' ITEM I: 65a�- 1 t3
RANCHO CLCA MO `GA TITLE. Q_ ���>�, �� M / ��� ►�
�. PLANNIi ' DIS'ISION EXHIBIT =.---& SCALE- '°"
CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA �
rr STAFF REPORT �
DATE: May_ 8, 198a . 1977 ,
TO ';. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
- FROM; Rick Gomez, City Plan� er -
BY: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: TIME gVENSTON FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82 -24 -.McIN YRE
PARTNERS Temporary Empire.BanK mated at 8505 Haven
Avenue.
BACKGF '3D: The temporary Empire Bank was approved-on February 9,.11983
and °rently expires on May 12, 1985. In ordk`� for . the Planning
Comr.,ssion to consider a time extension request #6- Conditionalo Use
Permit 82 -24 a public hearing 'has been scheduled for rte, 22, 1987.; the J7;{
public fearing is necessary for the Planning Commission to modify .\
Conditions of Approval regarding the expiration of the proje # and
submittal of permanent flans. ;' c
'., RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission C4,tinue
thi item tote May 22, 1/985 agenda to conduct the h,earTng
9 p
Re ect •yiy submitted,
i omez
iyPlan r
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map )\
Exhibit "B" - Site Plan
Ai
;r
1
aj 1
r
G ITEM B
i
5
1�
NX)RTH
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAIV10i\GA TITLE- "+term— B49
PLANNING DIViSTC?:V f E.YHIi31 --k._ SCALE
l� J,,
,wan
ESIDENTIAL
VERY Low; �Du'uaC
J LO'N z•4 Wr1ac -
[� LC'.U- MEDIUIfII s•bouaiac
+
DEE MEDIUM 4•i4 wwAG
MEDIUM -HIGH za za nusikC
1!I HIGH 24.30DUWAC
MASTER PLAN REQUIRED
COMMERCIAL /OFFICE
M
® COMMERCIAL
Q COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL
r-*--1 NEIGHBORHOOD (:OMM.
p
1111PIIIII REGIONAL COMMERCIAL. ,
—1 OFFICE
j
INDUSTRIAL
I,
OEM 'INDUSTRIAL PARK
-
SW GENERAL INDUSTRIAL
WE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL/
RAIL SERVED
NO HEAVY INDUSTRIAL
NX)RTH
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAIV10i\GA TITLE- "+term— B49
PLANNING DIViSTC?:V f E.YHIi31 --k._ SCALE
ARROW ROUTE
f f, -
j v. as •ry`
t
# 1# s
s R���
*gPy� ,
�s.r .fit i f k -t,It
_ _ .Illra•.RM LMC �
LKL.iM
Plk
14�'t'�IZTH
CITY OF
t1
n
ITEM
RANCHO CUCAM0, CA
P ICI iSiCh"�i
s J C s
y1
CITY OF aA n H O V V CAMI LD NGA G ;
M, EM-GRANDUM
r
U
-i`
1977
41
OATt
May 8, 1985
TO:
Chairman and Members of P anning Commission ,
FROM:
Rick Oomez,Ci%Y�Planner,
BY:
Curt Johnston; Associat Pl ner
SUBJECT:
ENVIRONMENTAti ASSESSME AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84 -17 -
CROWDER, - the deve 'r t of nine 9 research and,
ecevvFToanent buildings t ing 139,650 square feet on 9..16
Fusatrial
acres of lan�n the In Park Category (Subarea 6)
located at corner of 6th Street and Utica
„Avenue - APN_ 910 -081 7.
This project has' been with awn by the applicant. Since the
Environmental Assesinent was the 'project
k4ertised remains on the
agenda, but
the Planning Con� �ission should- remove the item from the,
Consent Calendar and acknowledge the withdrawal request.
RG:CJ:cv
Attachment
� P
•
O
i r
, iiEm C .
._ L`i.t,: ..�. x,.'�.,x..�ea+'Yat .,.,
r &y
t�F� .w. •,Y.. ,:s.. ... .. �� r si_�c.. ..,r ...
r
t'
v
OIL-
!%� 4t7izi� T
April c5, 1985 C.IT411
Mr. Kurt Johnston
City of Rancho Cucamonga ) =
Planning Department
9324 Baseline Road, Suita -
Post Office Box,_807
0
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Re: Parcel Map 8554 -- 6th and Haven Street Cucamonga
,;DR 84 -17 - Southwest Corner
Dear Mr. Johnston;
Pursuant to'the sut}jeci, piece of.;properiy, uathereby withdraw
our application and auttgrIze you to cancel any documents In
our name reiative 1:6 this property". „
If you have any questions concerning this cancellation,
piease contact us.
Sincerely: /J
Howard H. Kallmeyer
Assistant Vice President
ss O ,
t,
1317 NEST FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, SWE 110-• UPLAND. CALIFORNIA 91786 • TELE
.r
p v k.
e
r
y
CITY OF RANCHO CJCAMONGA '
MEMORANDUM is
wl�f
N
SATE: May 8, 1g85
TA: Chaiinan and Members of t P nning Commission
FROM: ick Gomez, City Planner ;-
}
SY: Dina Putrino, Assistant 1 ner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMORT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84 -29
"
TNE' KCLt; ; OMt PANY - T e development of an .eight building
industria"t park com lex totalint! approximately 104,000
square feet on 7.4 a. res of land im the '`ndustrial Park
District (Subarea 12) located on the east side of
�
Milliken, south of 61.h . trtet - APN 229461 -68.
At the 1',anning Commission meeting ."f'April 24, 5883, the Commission
voted to deny DR 84 -29 and directed Staff to prepare a resolution- of
denial based %i their decision that the project is inconsistent with the
.
Industrial Specific Plan Development Code and Desteral Plan policies.
RO:DPcv
Attachments: *Resolution of Denial
r
ITEM 0 _
RESOLUT1 N N0.
A RESOLU,f,�QH OF - .,T11E RANCHO CUCAMONGA ckANNING
COMMISSIONEtiYING' DEVELOPMENT REVIEW. 84 -29
LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF MILLIKEN AVEH- E, SOUTH
OF 6TH STREET, IN THE INpUSTRIAL PARK DISTR�T..-
-:�y
I
s• , l
WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of June, 1984, a complete application was
filed by the Koll Company ? rey4ew �f the above- described project; and
WHEREAS, on the 241,\ day of ;April, 1985, the .Ragphtq CucamongL
Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above -des trib�3�`p eject.
,f WHEREAS, said pr,. ect fails to meet the Urban Design Standards,
uidelne, and Policies seifg d r,,`he Industrial Specifu Plan; and
NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga `l anni::R,Commission resolved as
follows:
SEC, TION That the fol'roOng findings. cannot:, .be met:
1. Tat the de-sign. and improvements of Development Review No.
84.-29,, are, in accord with the General Plan, the objectives
0 '°`,e Development Code and Industrial Specific Plan, and
' .Moses of the dis+rit,tn which the 'site.is located.
2= rho,, pratased use, together with the c9oditions
appl Rc4vle thereto, will not be .detrirental to Rae ublic
Maith, 'safety, or welfare,' or materiail injurious to
proper iec: -or improvements in the vicinity.
3. That the proposrd use complies with each of the applica6le
provisions of tjri,`Development Code and Ineustrial Specific
Plan. ;
SECTION 2: That Development Review No. 84 -29 is denied based upon
the fualoOng facts:
The proposed sEte plan is inconsistfrit with the policies and
-
t intent of tbe;,General Plan and Ind%strial Specific` Plan, as '
s, 1� follows:
;
` r
L: Coordinated and logically, linked pedestrian access to
provide ,a comprehensive ciM ?`taisn system.
2, Coordinate and logically linked vehicular circulation to
« fide a comprehensive system with conf )nient acces-, to
'idings without interrupting open spaces
4y
Open spaces shall be Integrated with pedestrian .,walks and
defined by`, landscaping and other, elements to create a
sense of.glace« :.
APPROVED AND ADa7P'} D THIS Sth DAY ` OF MAY, 1985.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF feANG114 CVCAMONI*
Dennis L, Stout, Chairman
ATTEST:
Rick,; &omens Deputy ecretary""` —"�`
I, stick Gomez, Deputy Sscretar r -.of the Planning Commission of the City of
1?ancho Cucamonga, do heresy certif4,that the foregoing Resolution was 'duly and
i
regularly introduced, passed, and !idc�,tedr-�by the Mooning Commission of the
I
City of Ranchn Cucamonga, At a regt!4at- Wring of the Piao+ning Commission heed
1
on the ,8th clay of May, 1985, by the foliwi�Yng vote-to-wit;
AYES: COMMISSIONERS.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS.
ABSENT; COMMISSIONECSt
•
---- CITY OF RANCHO CMAXONGA
p O f;.•
1977
DATE* April 24, 1985
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commissian
1 FROM: }tick ,Gomez," City Planner
BY: ;toward Wields, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSiESSMEN"f AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AhIENDMENT'$5 -() nrway Deve<o' pme�nt zstrtc4
. Wnend�._ ^nt from Medium Residential (8 -14 du/ac) Low
MAdij Resideatial 4 -8 dur c) for 9.75 acres o ',land
located at., t#�e t urtheast corner 'of ArcF:itraYdtVrsrd asid
`r Pighland Ave t}v - APN 20E- 252 -23, 25, 26.
�CELAI�(1a 1 °' Tf 12914
1. PROJECT AND
A Ar tbn Regugstod: Approval of Developoent, ,tlfiatpict Amendment
and issuanco.of a Negative Declaration'. i/•
S. Pug ose: To allow the development of 78 single - family A�ome
C. Location: hOrtheast corner of Archibald) Avenue and Highland
;Avenue, -
D. Parcel Size: '9475 acres.
E. Existing`Zaii% Nadi um ide'ntial District
F. Exist ing klh Use: Abandoned chicken ranch;
G. Surriaunt Lind Use and. Zonin
North - :Vacant, tow -Med m 4 -8 du /ac). /f "
South - Existifig-sin le- family resident
dulac). , Lave Residential (2 -4
East - Vacant, Medium Residential, (8-14 du /ac).
West Existing single- family tract (Lemon Ridge), Low
Residential CZA dulac). ,,,
H. General Plan Designations•
Project Site Medium Residential, (4 -14 dular:), u
North —',-Low Residential, (2 -4 du/ac).
South - Medium Nigh Residential, (14 -24 dulac).
East Low Residential, (2 -4 du/ac).
West - Lov,,Aesidentiar, (2 -4 du/ac).
4l° ITSM E •� +..
? * t{
C�
g?�.ANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
�PDA 85-02; Kooyman
i1ay 8, 1583
Page 2 _
T. Site Characteristics: Subject site was utilized as a chicken
farm in past years. PreaNtly, the site contains 2 existing
residences 'Which are slated for removal := The remainder of the
project site is,._- > ,tar.,t-with approy`rately 3% -slope from north��,
to south.
IT. ANALYSIS:
A. General: The City Council set a maximumldensity of 9 du/ad (on „
appeal of TT 118U - .Roberts Group,) ; :Development District
Amendment 85 -02 Wassociat-ed'with proposed Tentative Tract Map
12514. The tentative tract_ map spas - Aeo:pod. at 8 dufac under
the Optional Development' Standards for ;he Lok�Me`�ium
Residential�� District. This request .will et'fect6ate,; the
dbwnzoning of the project site from Medium ";Residential X%44 ,
du /a4) to 1 Low Medium Residential (4. e�
8t�, which is
consistent_ with the -v4sti:ng zoning 1:41 the north t ow=Mediom)
i and compatible wits: the properties totthe best and south (Low
Residential)6 afid eatt'(Medium Residen:iaT' �
ii
B. Environment#] Ass____ etsment�: ,Based lipon completioh of the initial
Study, art :�I� the project till not Present any significant
adverse effeci upon the environment and the reduction in
density would reduce environmental impacts. .
III. FACTS, FOR FINDINGS: The subject property is suitabla for the
proposed land use in terms«of access, size, and c6moatibiiity with
,y existing land uses in the surrounding, areas. 'Further, the proposed
District Change will not have a significant impact on t a
{ environment. or �vrrounding properties and is in conformance
`�r�tTi
' the General Plan: �� �=
IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a Public--&arft
in The 5717y Report newspaper, the property posted, and inotice5.,
were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. C-
The applicant 6 dh�ed a neighborhood �peeting to receive conwini`iy
' input.
` ... ►.. a �_ o� v � may' "' - �--�r�
MAN AVE
kLUs
ARCHIBALd.
' j `' rrsea�co AVE.
4� x
j nN i i o
c`3 a 0
r C# lihoand v lllaO teed el
_ —
a
_ city 01" AAxalo CuCANSOmA
PART 11 - INITIAL STUDY
ENPIRON;jENTAL GHEC%LIST
DATE:�r"
APPLIOA,r'Tj'�Grti'4�.�i�%
F FILING DATE: r
Z Q d, rLDC3 EP:
PROJECT:
Pk0JECT LOCATION: r.%���PS�-r .s+. t/ t l .2G17%i 9G/_„1 !`t 'f '�/''• 'ly
'.. E.a111 `".•ii NTAL IMPACTS 1
F i(Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached
YES MYBE NO
1. Soils and Geoloev. Will the proposal have
significant vesults in:
a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in
geologic relationships2 ,
<J
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
burial of the soil?
c_ ,Change in topography or ground surfcce G
contou r ante
ry
als.
d. The destruction, covering or modification
of any unique geologic or physical features? fl
e. Any potential increase in wind or water
erosion of soils, affecting either on or off }i
site conditons?
f'. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? v�
g. Exposure of people or property to geologic "— °-
lizards such as earthquakea, landslides, mud -
slides, ground failure, or'similar hazards?
h, An increase in the rate of extraction and /or w
ft
use of any mineral resource? ,;
oloay. Will the proposals have significant sG
l resu�in `'
L
Page
2
YES MY BE NO
wt Changes in currents,; -or the"course of direction
of flowing streams,
rivers, or ephemeral srream�
channels?
L. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of
surface''water-
runoff?
/
✓
c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood
waters ?.. _ . ..
i _
I.:`..
d - Change -in �.�ount is£-surface *a ter in -any
of water?' \
!,.._'body ,
t/
e. Discharge into face water --- or any
-altQration of su��ace water
r
quality?
v
f Alterat�Con of ,'_g characteristics?
S• 'Change in' =he gginti,y of groundwaters,
either
drawals,
rev;t additions or with -
or thr
aquifer?
�!
ci interference with an
l tyti
Quantity?
�s
h The reduction in the amount of water othaz-
tais`e available for
_
it
public water supplies.
y%
-1
I. Exposure of people or property to water
lf�
related hazgp3s� s�;imh as flooding .cr seiches?
i
3.
Al- Quality:. Will the'proposal have - .'niacant
results
in
a. 'Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile
or Indirect sources?
-
Stationary sources? "-°
b. 'Deterioration of ambient air quality and/or
Interference with the attai:ix "'Of applicable
air quality
standards?
Y
C. Alteration of local or regional climatic
conditions, affecting air movement, moisture
or temrerature?
4.
Biota
Flora. Will the proposal have significant results
in.
"
a. Change in the characteristics of species,}
including diversity4 distribution, or number
of any species
`
of Plants?
b. Reduction of the numbers of an y Unique,
or endangered species of plants? rare
1
.:I
Introduction
-AYB E -0
of new Or disruptive species of
plants into
an areal
Reductioll in the Potential for agricultural
Production?
'Fauna. Will the propos�-X*have sipnificAnt r
In:
Change in the characteristics'a'f' Sp6ci;s, I
including diversity, distriburioq, it'T
numbers
Of*anY species of animals?
b� Reduction of the numbers -of Ylunique,
rare
or endangered species of anim, ?
c- IAtroduction of ".w. or d1sr�,,iptjvjj species of
animals into an area, or result in a barrier
to the migration or move4�ent
of animals?
Deterioration or removal of existing fish or
wildlife habitat?
Will the PrOPO,-pl have significant
results inz
S- ' Rill-thp- proposal alter.the location, dittri-
b-utiQP,-,density.,,�divf-rsity,,or
1�/ 7
grou-th rate of
the huzan Population of an area?
b. Will the proposal,affect existing housing, or
CT e ate a demand for additional housing?
t,6�io-tcononlr poctors. 'Vill the proposal have
signIz.tcant
su ts iu�
a. r6tlge"- lo:2 or regional
chavilct, economic
ics'.
Including ecomztc or
to=-erclal diversity, tax rate, and property
'values?
b. Will Pr*Jt�t costs be equitably distributed
among proj�ct beneficiaries,
i,e., buyers,
taX Payers or project u.jers?
land Use and Plannint Considerations. Will-the
propo... resul 5
a. A, substantial altera r ion of the present or
planned land use
of an area?,
n
b. A Canfliet Vith a!QY designations, objective.
Palic-les,
or adopt d plans of any governmentr
entities? al
An IZPact upon the julzt1ty-or quantity oj�
tXiSting�,-tonsumptive Or n0n-tzinsumptjve�
recreational opportUnIt1es?
� t
i
Page
4
YES
;fr1Y3E
No
$. Transn� rtat {or. Will the proposal have significant
results
_.
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular
movement?
b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for
s
new street construction?
c. Effect on existing parktz facilities, or
demand
y
for new parking?
d, Substantial impact upon existing";transporta-
tien systems?
II
e. Alteratdons to present patterns
tion or movement
circula-
of people andlo
goods?
f. Alterations to or effects on present and
potential water - borne, rril, mass transit or
air traffic?
%
`a
g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists
_
or pedestrians?
9. Cultural 'Resources. Will the proposal have
significant results in:
a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological,(
Paleontological,
and /or historical resources?
10. Health. Safetv and Nuisance Factors. Will the
proposal have significant results in:
a. Creatiop,•of any health hazard or potential health
hazard?;
'
b. Expos ��ce of Pe le to potential health hazards?
C. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous
sub.-tances in the event of an accident?
t/
d. An increase in the number of individuals
or species of vector or pathenogenic
organisms or the exposure of people to such
organisms?
e,. Increase in existing noise levels?
�.tr
f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous
noise levels?
S. The creation of objectionable odors.
yr
.._i
h. An increase in light or glare?
Y
'_C—g
4`
page S
YES :MYor.
NO
'
11. Aesthetics. 'Will the - proposal have significant
results in.
a. Ibe obstruction.,or degradation of any scenic
vista or 'view?
b. ff
The creation o° an aesthetically offensive
/
1 t
,
c, A conflict with the objective of.designated
f
or potential scenic corridors?
12. Btilities and Public SerrJces. Will the 'proposal
have.a siP,ifica�Ea
for new aystems, or
alterations to the followingt
a. electric power?
`
b. Natural or packaged gas?
c. Communicat3on!ig systems? i ='
r
d. Water supply?
e Wastewater facilities?
f. Flood. control structures?
Yf
g Solid waste facilities?
��
h. Fire protection L
w
. Police protection?
Schools ?'
k. Parks or other recreational'facilities?
1. Maintenance of public facilities, including
goads
_
and flood control facilities?
M. Other gove•,- men *_al services?
13. Pnerev and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal
have
significant results in;
a, Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy?
�
C
f
b. Substantial increase in demanrj upon existing
.
sources of energy?
C. An increase in the demand for development of
new sources
J o
of energy?
{�
d. An increase or perpetuation of the Consumption
---
r
of nonrenewable forms of energy, zthe asible
S
renewable sources of energy are "availaisle?
f
Page 6
YES :'As 3E NO
e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or
.scarce natural resource? 1
14. Maniatorr Findi: es of Sitaificance.
a. Does the project have the potential to degrade
the quality of the epvlronment,,substantially
reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife population: to drop
below self sustaining levels, thresten to
eliminate a slant Or animal community, reduce
the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or attimai or eliminate
important exatples of the major',jeriods of
California history or prehistory? ✓
b. Does th- project have the potential to achieve
short -term, to the disadvantage of long -term,
environmental goals? (A short -term Impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a relatively
brief, definitive period of time while long-
term impacts will endure well ir_ the future).
c. Does the project have impacts Which are ,
Individually Limited, but cumulatively
considerable? _(Cumulatively considerable
means that the incremental effects of an
Individual project are considerable when viewed
_in connection with the effects of past projects,
lnd probable future projects).
d. Does the projea_,have environmental effert,s
which x111 cause substantial adverse efieczs
on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
II. DISCUSSION OF EmrlRoiM' TAL EVALUATION, (i.e., of affirmative answq§. to
the above questions plus�,.eaa— discussion of —proposed mitigation
Measures).
el
}'
l�AJ3� 'Ile
Ile
�
T1
1'ata 3
y,
On the base
-.S of this initial evaluation,':
i
r
I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect
on the environment',"
and a NECATI IT DECL TIO'N will be prep ed ;,
I-find that although thecproposed project could have a significant
effect on the
environment, thr e wily not be a significant effect
in this case because the mitisation meaisures- described
�
on wpi
attached S44t have been added tc the project. A .iEG3TIVE
DECLAPATION
WIT, BE F$ AREA.
I find the proposed project :LAY, have a'significant effect or, the �
(tnvirnaent,
�
. and an ENPIRO ME-ST IMPACT Ptp(jRT is requ red.
Date;, NO* 2 fl� rs,
' Sienature
Title
>
%{
e.
:k,i�.. �.t &:. .ra:�': .5._ n, .-. li - �t'e :.•. .s _ .. -4� A .��-r�'sw:.i2.��''.
t
RESOLUTION MO.
-- CR£SOLUTION OF' T [ RANCHO CUCAh1NGA PLANNING COMbtISSlON
RECOMMENDING AP
�v Di'AI: OF .DISTRICT CHANGE NO. 85 -02
REQUESTING A='CHANGE IN THE DISTRICT DESIGNATION FROM
MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO, LOW, MEDIUM ;OR 9.75 ACRES OF LAND
LOCATED ON. THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF •ARCH11BALD AND
HIGHLAND..
Wt,cREAS, on -the 20th day of February, 1985 an application was filed
and accepted on'the abeve- described_- project; and
WHEREAS, on,.,the 8th day of May, 1985, the Planning Commission held a
duly advertised public hearing. pursuant to Section' 65854 of the California
Government Code.
10
/ SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission `has made the
fallowing findings: - -
1.' That the subject property is suitable for the uses
permitted in the proposed district in terms of ,
access, size, and compatibility witic existing land
use in the surrounding area; and
2. That the proposed district change would not have
significant impact on the environment .nor the
surrounding properties; and
3. That the proposed district change As in conformance
with;tehe,3eneral Plan. .
SECTION 2.' The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that
this project will-not create a significant adverse impact on the environment
and recommends - issuance of a Negative Declaration on May 8, 1985
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. That pursuant to Secti6n 65850 to 65855 of the
`California _Government. Code, that the Planning
Commission of the City 'Code,
Rancho Cucamonga hereby
recommends approval on the 8th day of "?lay,
District-Change No. 85 -02.
2. The .-Planning Commission hereby recommends that the
City'Council approve and adopt District Chance No.
85 -02.
3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related
material hereby adopted V. the Flanning'Comttission
shall be forwarded to J>tity Council.
l
Resolution Nom
Development District Amendments -O2
k
Page -
".
fi
APPROVED ANC} ADOPTED TaIS ,Bth DAY OF MAY, X985.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO.CLICAMONGA
BY:
Dennis L. Stout, Chairmat,
ff
ATTEST.
.Rick Gomez, Deputy 5cretary
I, Pick Gomez, Deprjty Setretary of the Planning ,Commission of the City of
.
?an;ho;Cucapnnga,•do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
r
re ularly introdk.ed, R passed, and adopted by the., Planning Commission of the
�Ci y of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular me
D etjrg.o<�the Planning Cormn'is;i.pn held
on the 8th day, of May,:1985 by the following- vote- to-wtt,
AYES- COMMISSIONERS: 1
NOES. COMMISSONERS.
ABSEKI* COM',1ISSiONERSz
!`
ASL
C1 �
U�
! f
\l .'7
k
1
t
i.
.'*iie����5.�:�dk�,
✓'
j
--- CIT ,C`i iC�MgNI�Yt�
'OF RANCHO r
L
' I DATE; May 8 7,985
TO; Chairman and�Memhers of-the Planning .401 �r'An
FROM, Rick Comer,�Ay,uPlanner c
BY: Howard P9eld's ', ks- ' -Stant Planner
SUBJECT,, E3VIRONMENTAL VS5SSMENT AN TENTATIVE TRACT I2914 ti
HIGHLAND ViL WE,' � „The development of 78 5 cigle -t�nz iy
detac ed homes onic: t 9.75 acres of ,Iand� in the Medium
Residential t)%istr {8 -i4 dutac), (Low- Medium development
District kmeAdsont request pending) torated, the
northeast corn
er � of Archibald Avenue and Highland -'APN
RELY FILE DDR 85 42 F
I, PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION ?
A. Actlpo Reguested- Approval of a tentative trt-.t map, building'
elevations, and i suaftte of a Negative declaration.
`. Pu► dse: Consty.I: ion of 78 single family detached homes.
C. Location: Northeast corner of Archibald Auerfue and Highland
Avenue.
D. Parcel Sizez, 9.75 acres
E. Existing Zoning: Medium, Residential District (8 14 du /ac).
F. Existing Land Use,.'. Abandoned chicken ranch.
A ,
Q. Project Density Pa'oject is proposed at 8 dwelling units` pet*------
acre.
H. Surrounding Land }.1se and Zo�
North a Vacant, Low Medium 4r6 du /ac,
South - Existing single - family resident, Low Residential, 2_4
'du /ac
East - Vacant, Medium Resideniat, $ -34 du /at.
West - existing single - family tract tt on Ridge), Low
Residential, 2 -4 du /ac, u
4{, f
ITEM P
PLANNING
COMMISSION. STAFF REPORT
,
TT 12314
- Highland` Village
' May 8, 1985`
Page 2
\
I.
Ge; era I Plan Designations. r
�t
Prgject Site - Medium Residential, 4 14 dy'/ac
No�'tki - -4 Low Residential, 2 du ac `
Sou',ff - Media n High, 14 -24 du /ac
Easf� - Low Residential, 2 -4 d�,, ac/%
West - Low Residential, 2 -4 du -«- ;
J.
Site Characteristics: Sd�Ject site„ was utilized as a chicken
fawn in past years. �resently, site contains 3 ex6ting
residences. which are slate for removal. The remainder of the
project site is vacant w, h approximately 3% slope froid north
to southc'�Existng vege�tion is shoyin on Exhibit "'H".
K.
i,
Applicable Regulationsr Development is beiiag proposed under
the City's Optional Del6japment Standards.
II. °ANALYSIS•
nj
A.
General: The .aroaec- proponents envision 78 'single- family
detached homes under se Optional Standards on lots ranging
-from, 2,995 sq. fr,, to a maximum 6,750 sq. ft. The proponents
have filed a retiated Development District Amendment requesting,
a change from Medium Residential 8 -14 du/11'.--, -to' Low Medium
�.
Residential, 4 -8 du,ac,
i'he site plan utilizes a large centralized open
i=
-
space /recreational area (approximately 40,000 square feet) that
will give residential unit access through _4 majorpedest'rian
linkages. Interior lots ,adjacent to the open space area will
have direct rear yard access.. The on -site circulation will
-
consist of a private interior loop street (36' curb to curb)
with two offset cul -demos cs'` The major ingress /egress 4� the
project site will Deco
via Highland Avenue. - In terms of
__ ,
architecture, the proje'
will have 4 different floor ;plans
consisting; of 2 and 3 bedroom layouts, with 12 different
elevations. The eiievations will be comprised of a contemporary
style of architecture utilizing various materials such as the
roofing materi, ;'ts, stucco, brick and rock veneer, and wood
plant -ons (Exhibit av).
8.
Design Review Committee: The 'Design Review; Committee
recommended approval of the tract map and design fJlevations,
with minor revision's. The applicant resi*anded to the Committee
concerns by providing minimum 28 food front setbacks, one
additional elevation to each floor plan and a color rendering
of the block wall design. Color drawings and a 'buidi'ng
a
material sample board will�be provtieu for your review at the
meeting.
-
ry}
s, t
~ ,1
T
PLANNING commis5lo" STAFF REPORT
TT 12914 - Highland Village
May 8, 1985
Page 3
\result
C. Environmental Assessment: As a of the Ini "tial,,';; udy,�
the prgjee will not present any significant adverse impacts
upon the e'vironment, however there will be noise and traffic
impacts f W future freeway constrdpt -ion that could be
mitigated
based on .the fallowing �;ippi'icable 'mitigation
measures.,
Ii act. The project :will result in future exposure to high
noise levels.,(70 C_NQ from Route 3Q Freeway.
Mitictation. The developer has provided staff with a wise
study that recommends 5 foot landscaped berms along RrchibalTd
and Highland to reluce traffic noise. Further, "the study
recommendss the outdoor activity area,be oriented away from the
_
direction of vehicle_ traffic. The) proponents intend: to
construct a b foot high' perimeter block wail and incorporate
67luble glazed windows on all units facing, the proposed, Route'
36- Also, a "detailed acoustical study on materials
used in the building design and construction will be required
prior to issuance of building permits. lastly, Caltrans will
be required to utilize freeway noise attenuation features
(i.e.,',freeway noise barriers)' to effectively reduce the noise
J
impact on nearby residents as required by C.E.Q.A.
Impact. The project w.11 marginally impact traffic generation
and circulation.
Miti.aation. Currently, traffic generated by the proj-ett will
be = mitigated` by „the four-way stop at Highland and Archibald.
Future street- wlt.ening to the ultimate right -of -way will occur
when Caltrans starts construction activities. A fs-eeway
offramp is slated for Highland and Archibald. Caltrans wilt
,be
required toe safely design the intersection gecmetr,y, o: r- ramp
details and effectively mitigate future traffic ciretIation and
noise as required by C.E.Q.A,
r
D. Neighborhood Meeting: On Friday evening, March 29, 1985, a
public meeting was held to discuss and inform the surrop -riding
neighborhood about thP- ,development of Tentative Tract 129 %4. A
large majority of people in attendance were from the"adjacent
"Lemon. Ridge” :development and generally concurred with the
proposed density transition Of this project.. Comments ranged
from good design elevations and model types to concerns .over
lot sizes and maintenance. Basically, the audience reicetyed
this project favorably, however the major concern discusved.Fwas
traffir, generation and required mitigation measures to offset
'
traffic impact y a
`
;Y.
.
E
''
..'
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ^i
' - TT 12914 - Highland Village
a
May 8, 1985
„
Page 4 �J
III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The findings listed on the attached Reso:jution
are supported by the following facts:
1. The proposed sub "'vision, in conjunction with the conditions-of
�
s appro� +al, is co ,istent with the current deveiopment.stah! rds
of the City.
:The project 1�Jadequate in size and shape to accommodate the
r proposed number of Jots within the subdivision.
3. Adequate street and storm drain improvements will be provided
to make the project compatible with the surrounding area and
E improve circulation and drainage in the vicinity.
4.. The project is cons?stent with the General Plan and confirms
with the Optional Development Standards of the "LM" Districtiin
which the site is located.
IV. CORRESPONDENCE: 'This item has been advertis�d'in The Daily Report
newspaper and notices were sent to all property owners with— 'nI,OOO
feet of the subject site. In addition, public hearing notices were
posted on the property. A neighborhogr_ meeting was conducted by
the applicant.
V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning ommissinn '
conduct a public hearing to 'e:onsider public input and elements of
this project. If after such consideration the Commission concurs
y
with the facts for findings`and'recommended conditions of approval,
adoption of, the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative_
Declaration would be appropriate.
Res tf # sab�itted,
C We
it la er _
f
G:HF:ns
Attachments; Exhibit "A" - Location Map
l
Exhibit 9" - Site Utilization
• Exhibit "'C" - Tentative Tract Map
Exhibit "D" - Detailed Site Plan
Exhibit "E" - Conceptual Landscaping Plan
Exhibit "F" - Conceptual Grading Plan
Exhibit ' "G" - Floor Plans & Elevations (4 Sheets)
Exhibit "Id" - Natural features Map'
Initial Study, Part I
' rte- Resolution of Approval with Conditions
CES.
7i� v lu
t
x�
i{
JAOSTE
ARCHIBALD
79
OD
i
All
I-j
U_
S_
I
t
5.
r
�,I
CES.
7i� v lu
t
CES.
v t
i J-
r$ i
I
'- r
L If
_TA
264 f
a
MN
PM
tit
fAtj
Wit-
Village:
Highland , -,,V--7
' `I
a
MN
PM
tit
fAtj
Wit-
Village:
Highland , -,,V--7
1A
O
.� � +'� ', t ; '� ♦ i t `rte �* .;
VDU t 1���•�.F �� ��` �j
ti
I'll P11
to
P
L-NTO
Hi ghla d �'d�i 6 tree# f ho Wes° 12914' y
pr
@IAI�
i
ARCHIBALD AiIENUE
ri
k iifi i �. � - f ✓tf_
r a
Z -
!� -- - - --
r�
Q z
°ea
ar
c�io oN °'
ob
• 2 6' :lczEZ sF f 'i ic'sj �s:= as s.[' trim rFa � ; : P4- gg
r r
t uI dy §sr- liili tr= -rip is€ t�e= pyyp
jo
Highland- Village tract' sorb o. ;? LgwsGAPg
?moo cdcam3no 12$14, 9 "
� i f
t
-AW villedis 6ot
Highland /0 CES
Ll ".,e,,""TOV — r
AOL
-. - / j
ail
Do
Highland
a
fr}i1T_ i
ho
1�1r
119E ... s
:a
• �. car i � -
lb
i
rgi a jj sd
Aw
1f
- ,14
Higmand Village trail a ex
me, �iwpip 1204
I ■Y
r
1
y t
r
AC
High
land Village tract
I echo.. 12914
ii
'Cl
!�
cif ighlisnd V 1Q8age -tract LO- , arrr:e� r:
ho emonge 12914 @n
Fwi•
7
r
F
Aj
411
(TI
( ;
z
Village tract
EE mho cmamongs 12514
4
_ _.. 17
i I
rnunrnt 1,�
10 am Wri
I.
i.wl.o...sii i ttrrtr a `i.w...� !.�I
:::. 4 ��, E7 Z
i......!!. I -`.
Oman
own ` °+ MA V I
ti.irnrt �pp �T
..ano
Kim
MIA
x'
k.
1 ILI
�; �. Hill
ao iar�Y tr 'r+arrw
7YArmmol"r t
11r.1111Krr4Y77�� t j
� YYYErIClrri[rni( -t � ' � I Ot'
sYYYRC.rrr�tYt. II 1
aYYr arrY t � � � i'. i1�Pjr
nYrr�i'�rrrr'r�
�Y�iticii a:t ■ rwK
— :"araaaatts���� man — -- z.
�irxni LIP
te��]aar�l�JHl�Q ■w:141 �i`�4� ��n•. =---
—_ -_
FF
�Y,•�
cl
1
l
A
q
1
rRE.
Aga.
�liO�t 10! r�
epmmu �.:
r
I?I 1�A!IJ!i!i tlgN taOa \laai?
trar aaararrlrt;
situ j �aaaiYYaYq.
itih�I�IlI •�aunNNNI
P ,y, rluaulrt
ul auarrr41
qarrn
11 iil { Au u
� ■1� � � • Y�jI�a611�1� i:e aukatitl
} iiiarnga�
A01� }} � Irar Ya ►a{
It It '� alYrartf
] A tapRR01
� � +T � IY11 irurYUroi
f �J LI ld.l.. tAIA i ■aHrilaarif
'•iiir�i°i
�A!r R■ tR }t�ragap .
}:_ ;IrttaalRartRlaaar
n Wit. ^rq gRra ■
w A!unlaa■uur�
_ YI( �aRflrY�iart
�I w` t1A4 aaaRllrgRYRY.
N1 S lit aaaarYYraraa'
- A ! • lgllta Ytaalgla;
:N iraaatRa'fRara;
iuiauaurt�l(aa�tr
•i J
d
4 ga 12914 ^``� jj . m
- ---�►,
w �
rr �.
R�L Fc
�tttttt t1t1% sL® _
titt�It!!tt sS��'
Will Will Uar 01
ml
YY� .anew a ..
,jt 1+u. ■ - aiulla+
all
yaW *Y
INN ll7i lit
auu .i
' • � � 1i� r, x 1 ; � � aau
u�
i ale +,
■ p� 1 at rt .rii
41
■ A, ill
s iai �. ■.tS �..
ail�kaw.aa.r.- a
■ t!a -- a.Yl AM. 3Y.YYl
s �O� \> aeis� illRtnlaY�
aitf Y.Ue.11
tKiNiAmP
.j
lFr ttlCL7'! p, aa.. -� a'rL i�
ail i
-
[ `
C
•_t.�„�a,�l2ii�.lSlui�G TlSa' .
• tt_ ■nfuiiiaaaY'
al�+a %, quniiaaaY�
NA
na�inii■iPi,
`4
i
I
La
Y LEGEND scale 1 inch 128 feet
,, ._ ...
BLUE GUM CUCAILYPTUS WITH JUNIPER DEODAR f
PASTURE S' SWEET GUM
TAMARISK WINDROW O `, SWEET
MAGNOLIA_+ X SHAM% ASH
P PINE TREES, - L LEMON &.1TTLEBRUSH
F FIG TREE W WALNUT .
B JAPANESE BLACK PINE
NORTH
CITY 017 1TCt�
- .1tANVHO lUL ll✓\Vt
?.ANNI \G DINS>> T! tilT !
"
tntT ..SC�rLt±w 1
k.i
u
- sr
3.6 Noise
The proposed project would not be* adversely effected by ns1se
unless the Foothill freeway (!touts 210) is ccnstructed.. This freeway is
l proposed, approximate'y 350 feet south of the project W . _Tuture project`ii
j residents be iprpacied by donstrucfinn noise resulting from the grading
and develbpmOnti offlip-freeWdy right -of_way ' The primary noise-impact from
freeway constructi(,rk:'ktiv ties would be annoyeice to'prgject� _sidents -
j duriar j" the daytime hop •s.
i Vehicle t.affic noise from th' proposed freeway (if and wiher,
constructed), would riot adversely- ,Impact the Proposed development. ;CALTRANS
Will be required to incorporate freeway noise attenuation features
fro '-ay noise brrriers) to reduce the noise impact o,nearby "noi3.e sensitive"
uses.*- Vehicle traffic noise from Achibaid and Highland .Avenues would not
adversely .iwpz _'t the project as long _as - outdoor . *r,ivity areas are oriented
I away from the diri`ction of vehicle traffic. However, it is recommended that
w
the project design incorporate a 5 fooir' berm between the adjacent roadways,
and she internal circulation pati.erri to reduce:Traffic- noise. An estimation
of local traffic ,oisp is sham in Table 3. Oroj,�ct generated traffic would
'' riot substantiallyi'increase local traffic noise 'levels it result in an.
adverse noise impact to the local commuaaty,-
The proposed afi- famii;+ residential project m usmply with,
.
the California Noise Insulation Standards, which spe r resign criteria
to limit the transmission of noise between .in dual dean!]ir► units. £Quito
transmission control between dwelling Gak. & achieved' io�corporating
{{ ,t the applicable STC (sound trans ion class) and TIC (impact insulation
1 iUl� class) rated wall and flo ceiling assemblies. The, project,-architect or
engineer should re ence the catalea of STC and II ratings for wail and
floorceili ssemblies published by -the state in order to utilize the most
j cost ective design.**
Federal Highway Admini:tratiOn, Federa
1976. 1 Aid ;Ji9hWay Program marrttalx 773 „•• -
' ** This docmnf�;„t can be obtained from the Offica_of Noise Co ir4rs
Deenartment of Health Sery -ices, from the way n California
947DA. Attent;on: 1-%, Zussell Du R.rea. y �, ,Berkeio�; Calii'arnia „•
A_
uj
o
�uj�
Fes— J
V-3�
u. mil^ cm i co I
ur
..in rlt�a .,. r.....3:,: 'rla E. 1. t ^3• !• -ir G,1.�� r s.y�;l� e.r.�,,, -..
UJ
7)
,r
7 LC W �� ��C) M: Yom+} -
i " -
co
tu
ul
• ,. Di 'C7 D tT CB _
io ac
w
in
r, CD cm �.
r_
r.,
ti s mT
F•tz U
xu, sue. > ¢ 4m �.
of xcn, ccvaE or modification
Y:,\ nit�u _Seola�,ic •. physical features?
t �. /
ea �Y pat'7tial ingr�ase in Wi <a or water
efsion • � f soils,'
Site of ' $ 'either on or uff!,
.�an ;ctO,i1 =
f• Changes in rsy, N siltatio,,nr deposition? i
g. Exposure n1� _irk•
ale or proF/ei Y to geologic
hazards sucH ,a. earthquakan slides, mu3-
?ides, ground fa {'Lure, omilar- hazards?
An increase iax the rate o � and uae o tracti /or�> f ZnY mfprral reso
k� 2. dzolac{ , Will the ,�ropasyi' ave s# i,cant T
results in: �� if j` s
RA,�C to cucAMONGA
PART 12 - TNITIAL .STL*BY
1
.f ENVIRO`MENTA. CAEC&IIST r
i D
DATE:
,4?PLICAtiT: 2 i� /
FIL2::� pATE•��yc� c?O •`�4fr c"
NU
• Lo MBER
PROJEC`t: !%.aSE�i�7"d`i'^.
PROJECT LOCATION: `
`
T. E*IVIRO,;' TAL ; IMPAi TS `I t
f ; (
(Explanation of all 'r a '+ r+ n j
sheets). )" end maybe answers ar'el�a i7 ,,d on attache., -
-,�
Soils an�dw lo¢v. W
MAYBF "N0
Will
si ai:io- `"'—,' the pro'bsal have
g ant resut;ts in:
iA
a• 'Unstable ground conditions Orrin chan�gcL.
in
geologic relationships?
b.
Disrupt ijns� d
displacements- •'compantion er
b4�rial; of ti:e ? _
_ .
c' •�Ihange in topograph :for g
ground surface
contour intervals?
d. The destruc ~' r
(; ,P
1 YE5 KAYB& 44
a. Ghanges.zn - tisrents, or "tbe cOT437se ok direction
of flowi.;ng treats Divers, orr P hpmeral channels? sc r ea m
b, Changes in absorption rates, drainage er
jatternr'.
or the rate ihd amount of Surface wat
runoff? /
It. - Alterato s Rothe course or flow of`flood t d'
paceis?
d Change in the amount -cf surface water 4n,4
_boay.af W tArz
e,^ Discharge into surface waters. or'any -
'llteration of surface "iaiCer' quality? i
f. Alterat #on of groundwater ctarictesistics?
-k:, Change in- the quantity of grou�dwaeers,
either through direct additions or with
drawals, or through interference with an
aquifer?
Quality?
Quantity?� _ �✓"
he reductfOh'in the amount of water other- - -�
wise availab~le for public water supplies? a
�!
i. Exposure of people or property to water
relate's hazards surh^- a�ooding or s-iches?
3: Air Quality. Vile the Fxoposal'have significant
results in:
a. Donstant or periodic, air em i�si.ozcs from mobile
or indirect sources,. "' .
Sf3tionery sources:'. ._
b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and/or 's
Interference w.tit the vitainment of applicable
air quality standar3s?
(I
c• Alteration o£;locar o= regional climatic
conditions, .a iecting air, mOvetrent 'moisture
or temperature?
4. Biota
E rrl)ra. Will the Pro p oral hat ve significant result's
� ia: -
a. Change in the chararteristics'1oflspedids, _
Including diversity, distributi on, oc number
of.any species of- iantfi?
b• Reduction of the numb�,\rs .�f any 'unique, are
or endangered specje$ a plants?
'
g
:age 3
"..`5 MLAYBE iQ
G. Introduction of new,or disruptive - species of
Plants in'v an area?
J
d. Reduction in the Potential 'fbr�agricult:uzal
production?
/
t/ 1!
;_auna. Will the proposal `have si ificant results
'
a. thange -in the characteristiciof species,
including diversity,_distrib lion or numbers,
of any species of animals ?.,
bs, Reduction of the numbers of''� 7 unique, Tare
or eudanger,�d species of aQ U
�Introduction`of
`
nev or disrup.J.4ve specie$ of
animals into an area,'or resu'it in a barrier
to the migration or movement of animals?
d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or
wildlife habitat?
poou_on,' Will the proposal, have significant
results in:
a. Will the proposal altez tht location, distri-
bution, density, diversity,
orrgrowth rate of
the huaan population of an area?
b. Will the grarnsal affect existing housing, or
create a denand for additional housing?
5. Socio- Economic ytetors. Will the "
Proposal have
significant resu'+� t= Ae
a. Change in local or regional soda- economic
characteristics, including economic
or
conaercial diversit•
? 5;i tax rate, and property
values.
t L
b. Will project costc�be equitably distributed
among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers,
tax payers or project users?
7, Land Use and planning Cohsiderations. Will the
proposal have sgnii_ cant results in?
a. A substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use
of an area?
b.. A conflict with any designations, objectives,
Policies, or .dopted pfans of any goner- =Intal
entities?
c. An itspact upon the qulaity or quancity,ot
existing con;- umptive or non - consumptive
recreational opportuniiter?
k$•
�r� ortatton, will tie
YE$ 0 1
�
resins in, oropasal have signizicant
` ?
Generatio { . f I substantzal add itional -,vehicular
tmvementF
E,
b. Effects on existing streets. or demand for
new street ronstruttion?
T
c. effects on existing parking facilities,,or
demand' for ne',r parking?
/
d. Substantial im ac
P t upon existutlg trans �r a-
tion p,�-
4�
systecs ?L z-
}'�
V
-
e.• Al'tOravWns to present patterns of circa
tian
or mov:mant of people and /or` goods? '
f. ',r Alterations to or effects or( present and ~'f
r-prential water - borne, rail, m8ss transit or
air traffic?".'.
-
g» Increases in ijaffic hazards
bicyclists to mctar . vehicles,
or redestrians'::c •
-
Sultural 1' F ro
osal xcav signzxicant
'eobrcR e-s-
result' in:,
- -
a» A disttirbanca to the integrity of, archaeological,
paleontelo$ical, and /or histor4cal,esour
&es7
lQ;
Health. Safety and Nuian�e "Far_tors. -will the a
proposal have significant resuk *s in,
a. Creation of any heal *:h riazard,cr patentia? health
hazard ?'
b. Exposure of people to`potent3heath
hazards?
C. A risk of osion at release of hazardous
substa;ces in the event of
an accidkent7
d. An increase in the number ot,3ndiv3dua2s
-_
or sp,!c .s of vector or pat,�I#ogenic
organisms or the exposure'IPj
organisms? people to such
'.S
e. Increase in existing noise level. ?�
f.� Exposure of people to'poteatially dangerarss
noise lgv,.ls»
�i.t
.; 3. -:
r�.,..
g, Tha creatXOn of o3" �t,4onabla o
odors
.....
d
h. r
An increase in light or gtr�aa.
� t
L
r
Page j
XrS ;,LAY ac
3Q
11. resthetijs, ti the proposal have significant
res ult4 In:
a. The;obst:'uotioa.or degradat
vista or view ? ion—of'—any scenic
;
b. The creation of an. aestheticilly;'offensive
site ?.z
C- conflict 4ith he ciujective of._.?esia
--
cr' otential- , onatei
p scenic corridors?
12. Utili ties ar.d: Pub11c- Services. Will tbs propasal '
$ave.a:.slgnifxcant
need for new�systems, ors
alterations to the following:
a• Electric power?
b. .Natural or.pacI I aged gas?
c, Cowmunicazio`tis syste+us?
d. 'Water" supply?
e,' Wastewater facilities? 1
f. tood'contio .=structures?
g. Solid waste a.
facxliti$s.
�
11,4 fire protection?
i. Polite protection?
Schools?
k,. Pa ks
x or other recreational facilities?
1. faintenaiice of public fatilities, includi
ng
roaj,', and flood control -facilities?
M. Othellr\, SovEental services?
T—'-'
---
13, Enere _. and "cares Resource
l s• �Lf2l LFte - a a-
p r �a l
_
grkif
have signfiianc results in: P .
a. Use -of cubsttntial or e_�.cessive fuel or.- Onargy ?'
b. Substantial, increase in demand: oy existing
isources,of energy ?,
c, An ,increase in Ch°, demand for devejopment ter
new
sources ?
of aneFay,,
� S
c�r..An increase or.- pexpeivatfon_ of the consum tition
of non - renewable ford of energy, ashen feasible
"renewable sources, of en are—available?.'_
_
j
J
Pagel
YES MAYBE NO
a.. Substantial depletion-of any nonrenewable or
'scarce natural resource? PF
14. Mandatory Findints of Sienificance.
a. Does the grojecwt have the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially
'reduce the habitant of fish -or wildlife species,
Cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal'cotraunity, reduce`
the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant er animal or eliminate
important examples 7f the major periods of
California history oi',prehistory ?`'
i
b. Does the project have the potential to achieve 1
short -term, to the disadvai"Se of long-term, I
environmental goals? U shSr`, -rein impact on the
environment is one which occuta•in a relatively
brief, definitive period of timt` while 1Ong- /
term impacts will endure Veil into the futurei, .__ yf
c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (Cumulatively considerable
means that the incremental effects of an
' individual project are considerable when view,ad
in .onnection`with the effects of past psojeats,
and probable future projects).
d. Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse etfects
on human 7jeings, either directly or indisectlyT _
iI. DISCUSSION OF ENS'IRONMENTAL EVALUATION fie,, of affirmrtive answert _
the above questions plus a discussion of proposed mat.`
f r �',, C.YOn measure. s) ,
eo
f -e.
Pate' 7
F ICI. D£T�L'K'!'`iaTFQ�I
w�
On th (� �
e ysa%is of this initial evacuation:
' find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect
' on the enviro:zent, anon a hEGnTi:'E DECLARATION will be prepared.. �
I-' find that although the proposed prole'ct could have a`significIant
Y effect MW the environment, there Will not be a significant effect
in this case because the mitigation measures described on ate
attached sheet have bean added a
.L�RATLJft WILL
M uE• Afj{ t R.' W K i L
I'fini the proposed project InkY have a significant of ect on the
L. entFitnaenC: and an E:1VI" -QtiQ tT LMFACT kt?Oh'r Ls� required:
I to 7t- S / �-x,.� ✓
acs' r
tie"
n
r
'N ^�_ 3
�• r;t
r
J t.
RESOLUTION NO.
+�
~ I
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING C0111I)ISSION OF THE CITY OF '
RANCHO CUCAM9NGA, CALIFORNIA, CT',01TIONALLY APPROVING
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12914
- `7-
I
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12914; >hereinafter "Map" submitted _
by Matt Kooyman, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property
situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, Stale of
California, :described as the ,.development of 78 single - family detached
su'.iiv s`ron of 9,75 acres a.' -1a'nd fn the Low -Me °um Development District
+
l,..ated on the northeast corner of Archibald Avequ 1 land Hiq? land - APH 202 -
252� -23 25, 26 into 79 lots,'- regularly came before the Planning Commission -For
�`
public heiring' and action, on "'� &, 1985; and'}}
ann
WHEREAS, the City Pl r''ha:s recommended approval of the Map subject
to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's '
reports; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Cgrmuission has read,, and 'considered the
Engineering and Plann%q Divisir��,Is reports and has considered other- evidende
presented at the public searing.
NOW, THEREFORE, the' Planning �mmission of the.. City of Rancho
Cucamonga does resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: The ` lannf6g Commission makes le following findings in \\
regard to Tentative Tract No. 12914 and the Map thereof:
(a) The tentative. tract is consistent with the General -/
Plan, Development Code, and specific plans;
(b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is
consistent, with -the General Plan, Dave Ippment Code,
;and specific plans; ,
(c) The site is physically suitable ^for the type of
`
development proposed; -
(d) The align of the subdivi�' )q'',', is not Iikel._,, to cause
v "istanti,,T environmental ;;Aamage and ., avoidably
Iiijur to humans and wi'dlit rthei - habitat;
(e) The'tentativz tract is not likely to causo' serious
public health problems;
(f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict
with any easement acquired by the public at large,
now of recoM, for access ° through or use of the
property within the proposed subdivision.
,f
I -'"�
Resolution No.~
i` Tr-L 014
a (g) That this 004ect will not create adverse impact s on
the environment and a Negative Dec:aratr"�n is
Issued.
SECTION 2. Tentative Tract -,Map No. 1.2914: iZ COPY of which is
attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to a ?,l of the Nflowing conditions
and the attached..$ta hard Conditions.
PLANNING
I. �Pplfcant shall submit `as acoustical 'study prior to
issuance of building permits, which, indicates..mirtigatibn
%gures to achieve interior CNEL maximum.
',a,_strruction- plans shall colform to thd'recp�mendatioas of
said report.
2. Applicant shalt redesign the perimetel* block wall in order
to jWovide a solid noise barrier, �f
ENGINEERING
1. Drainage structure shall be required to prevent flows
through driveway entrances,
4 2. t'he, developer shall gontact A,T. & S.F. railroad, regarding
deTet.on of, railroad right- of-way along the northern
L property boundary.
3. An offer of dedication .for the Li
shall be made to the City. The width shall be *0.6' ybey'4nd
the edge of the =rb or sidewalk with a total minimum
width of 46 feet,
4. The existing Is" C.M.P ` across Archibald Avenue shah be
replaced by a pipe With sufficient capacity to drain the
site and any other drainage from the`N.E. quadrant of the
intersection. The; Tine shall be a ;,iniam of I31= R.C.A.
S. The applicant shall attempt to acquire necessary right-of-
Way at the southeast corner.af Archibald and Highland," for,
street widening purposes prior to finaf map approval. The
applicant shall coordinate efforts with staff.
Pl
r
'Resolution No, -
TT 125.:.4
Page S
"U
it .
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS Sth DAY OF MAY, 1985,
PLANNING COMMISSION OF (: iE CITY oP RRNGE{t) CUCAt4ONGA
BY:
aennTS`-L'. S 5Tt, Chairman
ATTF'
R7 Oth12z, Deputy •�GCet�r -
I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the-Planning Con s' ion
of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and -..:
regularly intro4uced, passe4; and adopted by the PlanrAng Commission of
City of Rancho Cucamonga, a a -re,2gular muting„ of the Planning Commission eI
on the 8th day of May, niS� by the foljpwic 9 Vote -td -wit,
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONErP,S:
ABSENT, C014MISSIONERS:
0
...
edial� § .a. a.d°a � u.,�...u.x.... .,. °."S�':. ..5 . ,. r . _ ..
iH•iMe..i�!
- ,- -tW��R V fir. �L1 HVNK CO CL�pE 'V V'a�i OS 1`O
tlyG t O�N 4�y:�M A�'A' •nCi�grp
QqT y yy� °�.p IYY F'1t GCLy 6b Wp ♦+yp•g4 ^ $W 44 H.L
ea: W'L.b - ~
,G NCyR'W 4HLL Cy Vtl O E4 r C1C�O�71 i.�iJj iCt4 ==wd
w O •f.�3Yy�.r.9.0 UV��ys ]n ya. iy��
Md'sao's4'r' y.°+ at gv.t
l tle a w4 'L`'va ( ° 33 i`r
p9 ItlC .'^pL !r7 T R8 \�1s��WN
a. p G y bN y C CV.
Y x•"71 L d tl a:�H_ -Y y., .0 y, Ap�cc y � �"c c��
_ i. M ;7e�YA O.�++�.�N°N GM•OW� Ca� Cu Gj K�O iCiW ii�W +��
t �
J _Ya �#uv dA4gJ, tJT � '�tlY.+a."�C p '• � c°@Yc`.e'v N c� \SrZwY�O SariyAc A j �■■e> H iK F0. :OO.R CM14Cup' ;93 64 t° A rr V -.VI-t O =tL tl 40 G. Mya a ' r$C� CCp .... .
_
� wrL @gtltl tlpN �O.- VC�ItlO ��t '$w�C�! 3�aLn� p.�rV
b.^tl�•u« ��{. Y�4!iiN11 bRyC �_rMMa•y�j. 4�y «[ +i yyy�l,.
�Of` -•i
�y.� yf`'R rw M�*�d*�V .✓V �'ra tl>. �+1tlY � w H`w�44
y4uw CC �W.tl�yr NCy~ 'KCw. R�p G 4 �� � .IC f�. • -
-` W
,^ kt
21
OS Yv CT]YCVL -- %;- I; .- N,2 " ry -i.tKv 4aH. -.j 9p -
�iT)OV�tI L•"~`'
LN dCi W+� �tlC~(Q� �j ff pppp iqty9 C �
6YUM1 6b SNfV.gii� 'r oiaAN b°.UY <A+Pa �+=�SOM1nt1 �'OOY °W
_- � .! Chu �� .'S �4°i, �. &mow ✓�i°
a. t.0 p t� a a .0 p L a•
AWL, �tl4 a L f, tiWp4
AW
ZEE. Ltx 6=
d
Cr
IT t r.
� 1 ® i® � � ��� �� � �
x
^.OrC
�Cb�m � 'a�L. 11 V •C
N• -•.CT �� � OY
t E°ta p.
N
n °4°10
_.csw Q °QLQ uuo
.amp y T• .c
m;y '° .-�
N\ N
G 6 A R. O g Y a A
m
b i Y' C y S y-
La.V�ds�
L b N
+c-OS'
c =oa
a N.�., m, >. uD m'^
-' �.i
YLONC'
9 C
a ieun ♦♦-G'v`.
6wwL....b O.i /�q_31y.
C Q V L w T+ M X ....l
o
y TM dV +r dA
b A p sPh n
ay ^.p3A y`
V _. b O d C
.
n
0
m
^ d V
ra+oq a cuv =.a.
b V.
�L.c ual w' 'YUC.
4..CN b b
_
i
b� %
bu C N
wESL
V L b�o�z�. aPl.�
+E qC/ O C E
�m�.�OO MTNZ
Lau q
t C q� rl
�u1d Yp
m�
OO4L
ru
L o O
Calm �
VU,N
vi_ L7
m A
Cb
Nay�M
.M+ttC
N G m y
10...
�OtY ®�
O M O N c
CA
SvpNC
�A�LCyO.a °
gaoq
dE C
NS C:00 GL�
G 4 Gm D 3
m_yp qY L
•- o`
TY+•tl Z
��N mQO
m .mQA �Q�I
',c
o•ctc
L
NQ w �'.' Tc.
,4'i
cr al �o' aDa� eQ
w4q. A
sb q
•- cn'c
1-c Ly
La
- -u QO
a v..sda -�
�qC
T��..
.. abl�mY..n a
Q> N 'N > C ;� Ms
m
n Cy
z. d7 L yL SuH
+ S
9
4 z
^ECE�Tm�L TG
'
m 2 q 4L' Ol
L C cm.Q UQ 9....y
r C g
{E.�a6n
Y
CK° at ON ESN'4Ci
CNC LTA
y zS p
TC NNVw�.d Wn�2 OL :zl 2C N6 Gp
��• \
xw
..Man.a
-+aurm n. �.mTtm
O
m p L L
v P
vQz;Sii .yam N
Lo Ly�§r uQ��r
y
A
ei c
�n
w E
d`a m.:`ms
Y Qo u aly.
. °c.'aN 6y4ac
4N.EN -CfV
a u
ti�
"
v
r.4@
'L.y AN,M.Ve
;d �yP
ew 4� mQON LtT y.0
mQ 0'q" ly
V. i
YO.
O aOiT
maC� 40 a'-
cqo
5:2 0. 101Y a
Nw >b`u°a c y�
�O4 Oy ti } Jr g
cNy y1.a
��may
S =V bd
Y. YC
qW .-Nq OA
r 1L-sm Om. C
U^ C9LV
P•wc mq
C«
Yy N"CC L.E
ee /,
CC.CS r.aQ W
NN yna
•u� UL�C
t Y
NOq��p
V3
NN 6ro+ a26
cxn aiw wC bna=
O �� tG
4 x4b MIT UN
y Eu
W=GOyM
GG YO.
�. q.W.
L
VY 3l". O b
_ C.q N a
}dN IraE yL
.Dy CO.V btn�
_mG 4 LA y
alalw OCC�
4 4q Lqq
° qM�N
4QRVh
C� V
ma Q.. b 3496
.q�S m
C:Nd N?N._N�
.r }d9LL
4 .1 G L
CC Cp
Ku
L c u.a��r -4
V A +LC
E
C ACC N O'y3
,
G
^
J.
yy
CNIE
a
C TaS.a £ `N>Ny
G RSD6�
4)
^YuM
a
:y
�.
4
b R N b m U a Jl V O'p C S T J 4
„
dyg C�I�
^. 4n O
�m6LR �Ma.
-. ,t �bH O+V.:V� 4Y
a `�LZS aD ."'.E
4
q rJVViy4.Gb�
O NO Oppo,
al UL zcatL
OdLTH DO >COC
V.IY u
mLO�N.n
!
7
+'y�:nan crO. NF.aO
CE
°ICnn'61°.
t
s � Y
r L -0GQ D6 Mn N LYd ay pp�Oy Cin
c^ ��a °¢ dN W ° e tempo.°.- yams mom °ba.e-0
Ru k.° c YC ^O1 rl t ysu � - y° Ft iiO.r
C
mY o.v to - Lm D�nP D.� =m c.. II.+ea�.w... \`b:.` °•'-
z 4 aw tfc vTt'Cy�C P }:;
.� 0 -'Z N.
it Ga�L b G ° C V A+-0e UL= dY ¢N nN 4> Onb)�
d L u n T';
N.ym 99 V� � Ap NE c Lg ZL r��e°- X tp ,
-
�.`T
C C
Y C O n
9::-x tm,� e D i -4; Q L NOEL b U q G Q y
yyAaeGG B C Ga0 yNrt° N48�I
° db UpP O TON `N a i i 3C
' 'nc o ... � v n,G �+4u Aaji. �� V�mLq °a✓+u" y Lu - NbC e4i
tea r? u.. :r u n o
K..eNO +SYerm S dq N' rnv. 6L1 4a l =dN�'q +qDq G., e[ »¢q. tXy6 CU4pjuyq.
N
!!(( V
ao An �
�o -
-0° a
a lrP�. �
�.ai LdG TAB _
_nz v.0 P -iq -
3,2.2 Y 7 G _
_ tea. _ p
..� N
Ni:n `
`t N
N r
r-10 9
9~ i
iO� U . G6 A
AwJLbq gCaL
'N:y
R K
'F. N
N V EN Y
Y yP i
iy: u
u��Y r
rte. d
K -
-0N
t Q
E.
G b G y N
a
S
�
A,W NO +L
PK �
Eywd
TD P
��� q
qy C
CNCC 60'a �MdOC L
LM yO � dpi
a �
�. E
EeG.4 °
°"td L
LU.0 O
O�pN rCa Yl.. ULq� c LA 'OL
v
^ V
j
_ o
Q
Aft
L.am
o a -
-0LC� '
'°Yn m
mn. '. Anc.c ,
'�qn°. -
- -
N.Y P
Pne C
,^•c- N.� '
I So
e a'b
Jz
cn°
adrn°
a «siau
uo'
.o.
Gad
yo olq'o$
m
V"
Cyd OU °
3 W
� V
-0
iq Gr +
O
?
t y
C
C A USEE
N
b°y
U•..
.L
�bL. mO np NU =
V o
YnE dd
�^
gC�Y6
d T'
Wades
^.
ql`
CL
ji
®
aKa°a
VC udN S
nq $o
- C N
°uN
L} o:CYOd
m
U
U
4g
!a
b q�
S_
S_
=.EC
m d a^ q 'nom .�..
q
E ; 5.
oW.
�..
(i :
Vk
Y04
bCC .O L* V� � > 3
LL�9 �E A A..O'C G
t9 N•E,
#a.Cy
V o
a
CAy�4
CY'
.p��aJti
r
rY
7b
YdL
µ'V �0 W U
arm °
m OC ^yJ
Q
-z".9
o°
Yc
_ y
N
a
Kw
, n
Ob�GU
QeQ
4o�'cmi
2
N.� C
OA.yL I.Q Oy K "RV_�
4�C
b^
sO rG
01
by
�o
°G
e
aVw
±�
aYSa GLa J
Od
my�
0.-,
L.pi
u d
d c•
d
'
cd0
I�mOm
NiG.Oa �+vm
y C-L NY
H SCR u
46 3G LIL VIa I�
E ->Ym"046.
.0 C'A3d .0
-O I�UYl 3. 6 }na Y.H
ALy
L C n
Y.+AY�G.
i
(!� N
O.u^
6
nVA
1
m=
t
't I
_
n c
L
•VL
D aq'i
m.Y Oq. 4
�mm
N F0
b
qL
�0
uq
my L
i s
yNN
u
m.
aUY
^y
y
am `�
�•� 4C?
m
U�
q
b9
�'�"�
JACK a
Cy4�
O.
N i
U`
�N
ut
S. c
mN�
4a J-
tV
aLVru
r a!la uv
a
E �^
L
a c
b
c".
>b Y°TYQ
AY b
N >AC
�L�C
e
c� VTU �W ..'c+
VV S
q'mO YQ.
6�=
EA. .o •a•�
Qb L
ab
qL
E^
wti M
LCq
Lxx
Of
v „^N L AEG
b yY = =N
E y
« +q
bYyy,EE
°': i
db
am
aMdn'
aµimL
OCb
y
PdnS
-.-.q
m. Va ° LC �
N °yA
t't^ �,_aa.Y. yC(
aYyU
.5b .II
-°•+y..�
V
r
W4 G
V9Y
q L c0
o.
y COI
EC Via
S�
NY°
ON ny
VLY2`
CEO Y V S
bN •.-r dM9 tT
..°. 11GN
bGC a
u C 06
NT.�.,� °6��
G40.iL
d'r t.}
�qQ9
i`
��NtY
UT odmN
W O npCd d
UO C d 0• pl�� L
L C �_
N
Na° M
n•h
EbT Of CSSC
52 C
_ b lt�i? L
m+- L nNr
O
L
Cee4
HN✓a Ur•
G mvL
? }r Jig ^” �
Ln
l+N+An
Q66i K1UN�,C
O
1JW
y_C
�
dY11'�
N
N
ik
I
W.'Ci 3
bf .; k
i
Ev y�
A
y
4Ld V1.
YN
e.0
- �apC
LNQ^d0
Ly
1ph
E 4
ii
b N
A
Q'
ap+ d _t�1 C• L
NL uEQ
Qyro NS,;
L �
1y C
iN
YOB b=C�C`
C� CLr
\
Oy
�
O,4 iY -
Yid
. 1U
Lr N uLirn
i 4u�
a
ova
ymn
,n
A •„ i dY
� N~
o �
du L
aY
Stu
%a
dL O��^
,.ca
a A
uu�
T
NEO.,>
aFV
O1 .`[vim OdY
4
C ^4.
c
'ow �.
4
�La�C,E
five
- qau °10.3 • d�
A�w riN
1=
Q
`ou o
W
Or.
u a
Y d
A�d4L
�irp
o o
vro '�::LO C01;
_:y
Cro6.v q.
Y° Q
T
Cy
9w ( 1 4 EY
C
w Oc
aE
ac
MO. . U.
Y 4q 3
60L
°.-
Q
u
v :Y.
•
o.. W. 01,.
wv 4e
ttu nod
4u.=+.
!
Ln
It
.-
y' L a
N
v
E
Nw
yap.
r •
qiy a+
c Ly
01p N
OALi.
LC0
L3 O
id •N
zzO
C�
yYL yQ
q
NN
O 4 Y.
dC
L'OC
WNw10
C
qC
O N q
sO
s A <
�j
wa V C .A,,p
ppEE
6
wL
� ®
YrC
V Sm
'4 ag,a
d0 gC
Gy n'.
CNN Y YrQ
C � r Y 44
..L.
9+ '
CNy'1'v
w. 0C
QN.dCN
CTL
L�Oy4
11
Q' N
Y
�
imYC
N QOO
w
N� d�
d pEE' 1
Vf � OtL
C .O NNg C u°
d0
v/ O
L O
ar C
W L Y
�qqv E4u
N O Y d 0
L 6 . 4 A O N G L E
ro
w a t A
s a .2
d A y�
.� Y� OY
4
Ot0 O>o �L.
6 ^ P w t
O
01 O
LCC O
N�
w=Q6
0010
Z N Q
ro E
CO
a
C iy
C
g Y
VO
LN
tv
aE ^w O '
pw.. mOY
C.r.
dd
ggOOgO�dy,
MNON.ef
QadO T,
+9: VQ
3>v»
'C LOY
t
w
Xa0. 7, iClw N
2V b W 2tU � d
ls�l I I
ErL
rv,
II L
N ra
NW 'Slap A N G U4 N G
y -0D t C:. OI K`u LU pjY G .CY 'G AOL
sa a a a .t m t
4J
.CD
� CIC' °'� �.°�'° `"C `r O41 UR D"'�,.KC. °.-0D. c•°,'CC +'- <`+, Qp
V f 'g_
� ^� C�'ggy ..may L^ W iyK �4 A7 {•'C�IfL.O A 1�-+� 4 .
GUS.. UL Arc y.rt aAU .q
A.Yr C qp >'S4 R.0 CW yO y... L
tD(
S,-. 41 qvw� �.L�R� >3 /ip� Cw 6d VKyyt tA. D'
E}`
�SNn� �:EO� 4C pK tL �bt D
L c
E,-0 LA
22 L.. yN ~w0 6t�W Lt Kp` Gb O�+.GC 1r. O^
.G. J
c u i
.�+ ya 'Yi e n .x
Rf
°. / 1
z!
O�+w' Vfb 0..4s <U O..- AY f+KF LC{ 34 uiiQ r[ k
♦ i,
t ,
q N Y j
y O'
r 4
y�a
pYim -0 6 b G Y N4 4Y ..... "�
'` as L4 .uQy vktt oK
ti y� p0s >tiM� L1W M V d_ 6Ny
4 G:. WYE p _ GEH
Ecb
at: G a
E�
9 OI N
d
C
A �.. A �♦ -0 ;vw
O� HT4 N W yxO R U $O� LrD qpC
�W
E MOtK d~ Cy y� t=l t='J Y L L .Dw.
Cs.... s Si4b^vp+ $w CE A C a .A.:ny
N d L M N A
E y ro 4,
e r « osw r
a °d U
d .�-r wt r n cat w ~'D „c• y.
•n r '° u o y° c a d +,J .°L. y r M e
9L
Vp.
.v !-M °'+°s Ly d.. dC N •t 'ISH d � ✓Y
Sd dd M� '.dad G Ce3 a° Lt°i N�.. 4gCY •N:
u� o
~ N C C N N d
We
2-.-.
SET 7� MM 9y -Mg
a QN� g Ly Oy �� t♦t
O qME . Mi d Gda ` 66 Naes 'tl CQ
O a �.OZia 6r IL O. 6 G _r�+C' L,.4 ldl�
c
q
.•. M a Y
L O,
�Y pOd r
e! tll N L
L d g 0 z c L Y:
�Yy R��: d'N wT Oy •° n C V
° v N C
or W c rn It.
^ d c
N
pCdU °CO °uD wd+'d G„CN a Lisp r-� •°-S� NM
Wip M dp • r°.' L'^ E.
� d A L ui u 'b O O v� d•.• .�pp d d ►.c U TU iYd::.0
si{T
H9 � r-IVU L QOM QN J LT.+O. b � NY+X+rt E �Y
d �
CS
� f
�,:I7.'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA " c�CA
STAFF REPO, r
M
LQ77
BATE: May 8, 1985
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Rick Gomez, City planner
BY: Nancy Fong, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRON14ENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85 -06
- I FORNIR RE Ient hoREMENT VILLA INC.- The development of
164 nit retiremtel far senior citizens with other
services - provided such as dining facility, recreation and
exercising facility, arts and crafts, barber and beauty
r shops on 1.75 acres of land in the Office Professional
District, located at the kUth` side of Base Line Roads 700
feet east of Carnelian Street APN 207 - 081-19.;;
I L PROJECT AND SITE,.DESCRTPTION:
A Acttian Re nested: Approval for a retirement hotel facility,
precise site plan, elevations and issuance of negative
declaration.
B. Purpose: Construction of a 104 ,unit' retirement hotel with
dininS facility, recreation and exercising facility, arts and
crafts, barber -and beauty shops.,;
C. Location: South side of 'Base Line Road, 700 feet •east If-
Carnelian, Street.
D. Parcel Size: 1.76 acres
E., Existing Zoning: Office Professional
'F. Existi Land Use: Vacant
G. Surroundina,Land Use and Zoning-
North - Commercial, high ,school, General Commercial
District, Low Residential District (2 -4 du /ac)
South - Vacant, flood control, proposed'. park; Flood Control
District, Open Space District
East - Park, single family homes; Open Space >District, 'Low
Residential District (2 -4 du /ac)
West - Office 'Park; Office Professional District
ITEM G
IV-
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
May 8, 1985 `y
Conditional Use Permit 85.-06
Page #2
�1. General Plan Designations:
Project Site - OfFfice1)0rofessional
North - General Comm rcial,'Low Residential
South - Flood Contro', Open Space
East - Open Space,;�ow Residential
West = Office Prof,�essional
I. Site Characteristics: The project site is in proximity to
r office park, shoping' centers, a high school and a proposed
City Park with recreation facilities such as ballfields,
shuffleboard, courts, recreation'` rooms, etc. The site is
vacant and slopes towards the south at approximat,:ly 5% ,A
`
creek is located to the westerly boundary. Vegetation
`
consists of grass, shrubs, 12 elm trees, and 2 Cypress trees
U which will be removed as a result m` this project. The
developer will be coordinating with the City's Community
Seeyice Department a
st hand
exchanging o ipof to the east and west
B �ide
side (see E u n
ti60
J. Applicable Regulations: The Planning Commission on November
14, 1964, had made a determination that senior housing is
{
allowed: on a case by case basis under a Conditional Use
Permit in the Office Professional District .(see attached
November 14, 1984 staff report regarding .use determination).
II. ANALYSIS:
A. General: The proposed development consists of a „three -story
building with 104 units and other facilities provided such as
:. dining, recreation, arts and crafts, and barber and beauty'
shops. The elevations proposed are of Mediterranean styles=•--- -
with red clay file roofing, stucco walls, wood balconies and
” i(
arcades; and has an ample lety of architectural treatment>
and details. The building area is oriented to the rear
portion' of the site while the recreation area and parking
facil *,ties are located to the front portion. Access to the
project will be provided from Base mine Road. The number of
parking spaces provided for this project are is spaces.
,recording to the developer, 65% of the units are reserved for
;
single occupancy while 35% are reserved for double
.; cUpAnty. Using the parking ratio of 1 space per 4 beds for
Tag beds, the total number of required parking spaces.. is
34. Therefore, the proposed parking facilities are adequate.
?
` This proposed use is a congregate living for seniors and is
,
operated under a State licensed care facility. The typical
ti
,
yA
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
I'
May 8, 1985
Conditional Use Permit 8506
Page #3
unit 'consists of one bedroom, \living room, private bathroom
and no kitchen. (See Exhibit;:;!'I °), All services in the
facility are provided for in one fee, rhich includes a
furnished suite, three meals served iri a dining facility, a
;-
'room w
game - th arts and crafts
9 �� ,- personal laundry services,
paid utiliti:= and 24-hour security. The facility provides
lobby rooms, beauty salons, lounged;; outdoor courtyards, and
on -site licensed facility, managers. In general, its
clientele are typically those who are independent and can pay
a moderate price for all the necessary services and care.
Attached for your review is a- letter from the developer with
1--full description for such facility. „
B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee has
reviewed the project and determined that the proposed use and
the <- overall site pian comply ` with tie intent of the
Development Code. ., However, )the Committee recommended that
the following improvements be made which,' deveio -,� i� agreed
to:
1. Dense landscaping shall be provided! allong She west
and south elevations for protection of sun and wind
as well as buffering from the future ball field to
the south"
2. The north elevation' should be improved by designing
'linear
the Tong roof overhangs at a steeper angle
that strengthens the - appearance e, the roof element.
G. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study h
been completed by the applicant, Staff has completed Part It
of the Environmental Checklist and a Copy is attached.ftor --
your review. Staff has identified -the following
environmental impacts,
1. Noise Lmpact:
o The project site is impacted by road noise (6r.
65 db) from Base Line Rod as well as the crowd
noise and loudspeakers from future Red Hill.
Community Park and the future soft ball field,
(66 to 75 db) A noise study has been prepared
by an acoustical consultant to investigate the
degree of impact and to provide for mitigation
measures,
Proposed Mitigation Measures•
f
o A brief f <�
noise study, to confirm that conventional
a.
a
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
May 8, 1485
-Conditional Use Permit 85 -06
$ge #4
l•A - l(
construction- details of i�i s project wi71 - suffice
in complying with the 45 `-NEL noise level per
Title 25, is required at the�e�nstruLtion plans
check process,
o -A cOntinuous 6 foot solid fence /barr'�r (at least
n `b. per square foot ), should b` installed
' around the proposed recreation area tending
IV
from Base Line Road to the south side the /.
east property line.
o waterfall or watery fountain of sufficient size
as to-create a sound "mask" of its own around the
recreation area and to mitigate the physical ante
Psychological effects of traffic noise.
o Double glazing windows with at least 2 inches
airspace in separate frames should .4e inst? _1-1-d`_
to the south side and east side of_ the rdin9F `
4
o Double thickness drywall „should bf� installed tG„
the units adjacent °to the park`aret J
2, Light and Glare Impact:
o The development of th`13 project may expose its
residents to potential light and glare from the
future Red Kill Community Park and the future
soft ball field.
Proposed Mitigation Measures:
o Double pane tinted glass shout a installed to
the west side and south side of the building, in
addition to blinds or opat,ue draperies.
o 'tense landscaping should be provided to the east
and west side of the building.
Based upon this review, Staff has determined that although the
proposed project could have a significan impact on the public
health, safety and nuisance of resident`. Jthere will not be a
significant impact in this case because the mitigation measures
described above have beers aided to the .project and the Conditionaa
of Approval. If the Planning Commission concurs with 'this
finding, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate.,
NNING COMMISSION ST13F_iitk T �
Ma y t
Conditional Use Perte;lt lJ r
Page #5
III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the General
Plan and Development Code. The project with The added mitigation
measures will not be detrimental to public health, safety, cause
nuisance, or cause significant adverse environmental impacts. In
addition, tke proposed use, building design, and site plan,
together with the recommended Conditions of Approval, are:4n
compliance %fith the applicable provisions of the:Aevelopment ode
and City Sf- „dards.
IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Daily
Report as s pnbiic hearing and notices were sent to all the
property owners within 300 feet of the project site.
V. RECOMMENDATION* Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
consider : au
material and input'regardir� this project. If the
Commission concurs with findings, adoption of-the attached
Resolution' and Condi'9sions of Approval and the issuance of a
Negative � aration would be in order.
Resp ct+f submi
R ck ez
ity an r
G .INF :cv
i
Attachments: November 14, 1984, Planning Commission Report
Letter of Description of Proposed Use �_ - -. --
Exhibit "A” - Location Map
Exhibit "8" - Sii,e utilization Map
Exhibit "CO - Proposed Red hill Community Park
Exhibit "[l" _ Detailed Site Plan
Exhibit "E" - Conceptual Grading Plan
Exhibit "F" -„ Conceptual Landscape Plan
Exhibit "G" - Elevations (2)
Exhibit '9i"` - Perspective View
Exhibit "I" - Floor Plans (2)
Initial Study, Part 11 with- Addendam
Noise Study with Supplements
Memo from Community Service Division ,
Resolution of Approval with Gonditioi {s
LOS ANGELES OFF,CE
21120 Vanowen Street
\
Post Office Box 633 --
Canoga Park, CA 91304.0833
+
Telephone x46605618f3a78360
BBN LABORATORIES Telex 486057
Consultants in Acoustics and Vibration
25 April 1985 �ti
A . .r
,:.
Ms. Nancy. Fong
Assistant Planner
9320 Baseline Road, Suite "Cn
F echo Cucamonga,'California 91730
Subject: Supplemental Notes to our Exterior Noisy: Impact Study
Villa Del Rey Petirement Hotel; Rancho Cucamonga
BBN Project No. 190003
r, Dear Ms. Fong:
Pursuant to yo;,ir request, I am aug�enting our earlier letter `
f report of 16 April 1985 on the subject project to address the,
issue of noise levels at the worst -case balconies.
All the worst -case scenarios 'examined in our earlier report
pertained to balcony locations. Thin -,for road noise in the
year 2010, we would expect 60 CaIEL at, bhe worst balconies
and regarding ballpark noise we would expect 75 dBA peaks of
crowd noise_
Cnl.y by enclosing the balconies by about 90 percent would there
be much noticeable noise reduction at the balconies-
I
-then we
would have to ask ourselves "Do we really have balconies an y
" +L
more ? More likely, only a bay window for the room would have
been Erd and there would be no balcony.
I submit that the 60 CNEL outside figure is acceptable balcony
noise inasmuch as the peak levels there are unlikely to occur
when people would think of being their balconies
on in the
first place U.s. peak rush hours). The ballfield noise
y�
exposure is very different and is much more likely to be very
more
quiet of the.(useful) time even than the balconies facing
Baseline Road.
This completes our report. If you have any further questions,
please call.
Sincerely yours,
t:,
BBN L ra
J
Dries Into orated (�
t
David Cogent,
S or_ w �ultant
DAC -abm n
A D&GIon of soft Beranek and Newman Inc. Boston Washington and Los Angeles
,e
r
LOS ANGELES OFFICE
21120 Vanowen Street
Post Oftlob BOX 633
Canoga Park, CA 913a4463'i
q Telephone (8181347MW
BWI LABORATORIES Telex ltisos7
Consulmnts In Acoustics and Vibration
16 A.p6iil 1985
APR I t 1985
Richard Thompson, AIA
Arcbiplan'
6629 Melrose Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90038
Subject; Extes.ior Noise Impact study(
Villa Del Key Retirement Hotel,. Rancho Cucamonga, CA
BBN Project No. 190001
Dear Richard;'
This letter .'port summarizes our study of the subject project.
We have concZu:_ �. t with proper (but riot unusual) mitigation
measures your proje�t will not be adversely affected by ither
roadway or ballparl, / noise..
ROAD NOISE
Currently the sui61ect" p^ro. perty is impacted by road noise from
Baseline Road bd!tween carnelian street and Vineyard. The
"multi- :family" units extend from 250 feet to .'.30 feet from the
centerline and the walls and glazing exposed to the traffic "see"
only one -half of it due to shielding by the building itself.
We obtained current and future traffic -flow dat4 along Baseline
from Paul Rougeau of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering
Department. Based on these -data and our noise model commonly tJj
employed in such studies ("Calculation of Day -Night Levels (L43i►r
resulting from HighW'ay iraffi.c,m August 1982, developed by BS14
for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Noise
Abatement), we determined that the exterior Community Noise,
Equivalent Level (CNEL) for the year 2010'(after the Foothill
Freeway is finished) will be 60 dBA at the worst -case units.
The pertinent model data follow;
15,000 Annual Daily 'traffic (ADT)
18% Night Traffic (10 p.m. 7 a.m.)
48 Heavy Truck. Mix in ADT
mph Average Speed
A Division of Batt 84ranek and Newnan Int. _ Boston Washington and LOS Angeles
RBN LABORATORIES
Richard Thompson
16 April 1985 �l
k
Page 2
.Prior to the "build- out" of the „Foothi't`,Freeway the ADT along
Baseline will remain near its C1Irrent ikk� ek of 27,000. Thus,
the predicted levels due to. this c,3jiti�in will be uniformly
higher prior to that time by 2.5 dBA reg&i dless of the distance
of the receiver.
the CNEL of 6Q is the level of outdoor noise at which Title'25
of the State Administrative rode requires an outdoor -to- indoor
noise analysis to ensure that the interior level does not exceed
45 CNEL. in our'experierce, conventional . construction details
will suffice for your project in complying with this require-
ment, although an add.tionz4) brief study to confirm this in
writing will be required as deign development proceeds.
We also examined the expected noise levels in the arbor /gazebo/
pond area. Under the current design we find 66 to 70 CNEL in
this area. Despite the pastoral nature of this park -like gesture,
these levels are excessive for most people of normal hearing
wishing to enjoy the setting. Two,features could be added to
significantly mitigate the physical and psychological effect of
this noise:
1. A continuous 6- foot -high solid barrier (at least 4 1b per
square foot) wrapped around the little park following.;the
Line of the proposed fence,,south to the gate to the iced
Hill Community Park to -the cast,
2. A waterfall or water fountain of sufficient size as to
create some noise of its own,-,around the gazebo.
The baLrier would drop road noise to 62 to 64 CNEL and would
h , elp promote an "out -of -sight out-of-mind" e`fect on marl n i__se.
This would be further aided by the apparent substitution of
the water noise.: Finally, there will certainly be many oc•.asiEns
outside of peak traffic hours -when the levels in the little
park will be " to 15 dB below the CNEL values and residents
may well choose to enjoy the park at these times.
,
RED HILL COMMUNITY PARK - 1
'
This proposed public facility will have no significant "Title-
25 -type" impact ;;3n your project, although it definitely will
affect residents on the south and east sides of the complex
unless specific actions are taken. In conversation with Dick
Mayer of the Park DejYartment I learned that the smallest ball-
field (400 feet from nearest units) will have Loudspeakers
a
G_
89N LABORATORIES
Richard Thompson i
15 April 1985
Page 3:
and the nearer, larger one (150 feet away) may also have them
at a later,date. Night lighting is a possibility for either
ballfield. Organized games may draw as many as 300 spectators
to an one event.
Our experience with similar playgrq,nds and ballfields shows
that usually, in terms of total sou�d level, =owd noise
dominates the P.A. system levels, which achieve maximums of
nominally 81 or so dBA at �0 feet distance in the direction of
the bleachers .- iith some care in the system design, 15 dBA
level reductiorr%ban be achieved with directional effects and s
limiters can be applied for accidental misuse of the microphone i
input. Thus, we ..can expect, with distance 7.osses, maximum loud -
speaker levels of 43 to 52 dBA outside at tine worst -case units
depending on the ballfaeld 1,6 use.
MV-h more important than the i--. A. system will be crowd noire.
We predict peaks at the worst- case .units; of -,'S5 dr8k (from the
smaller field) to 75 dBA (from the'.nearjr,' larger. field).
Althou,h these are peak levels only, fi�.ey can distt�xb residents
if they are shielded only by ordinary` construction. °I.� the
glazing of such units (on the south and east) were 1/4 -inch plate i
sliders, the interior maximum levels ttould be about 36 dBA from
the smaller field to 45 dBA fii= the ;fearer, field. The 45 dBA
figure is, in our estimation for such a project, a bit excessive
still, and we would suggest going; With;,3ouble glazisgg with-at
least 2 inches- , irspace in separ;xte fr es. This e ??,uld bring
the interior levels to the high ,IQs,, which shoulrl-- oe�aatisfactory
most of the time.
Finally, to ensure that the perforra:mce of the glazing details
is not circumvented by the air - conditioning vents to the units
on the south and east sides, wc_'Should examine your ducting
layout and provide recommendations
as.,n
e.,essar y to ore ate an
needed noise: reduction then +_ Y
i
Than completes ot-r report. If you have any ttestions, please
call.
Since_Ely yours,
BBN L TORIES
lla A. Conar�Y,c,ena or Consultant
a
(- CITY OF RANCH J CUC ONG
, A�+I 4 vcAn -r
MEMORANDUM
Date: April 22, 1985 0 p
TO: F
, Nancy ,assistant planner U >
1977
From: rYick M , ra k presject Coordinato7i
;t
subject: Vil, -' Del T ey Retirement Hotel project
i have reviewed the revised conceptual grading plan W.,omitted by California
Retirement Villas, gne, for the above referencecivprojeat, -I have 61%e
following concerns which can be alleviated by pla;.,ing. certain conditions on
approval of the development-. These concerns and cond:U=Ions are as follows:
i. concern: ^h�e�ro�ect p13,,s do not scale appropriately. The rear lot
line is dimens�,`bned at 252 feet, :however, it scales to 258.,fRet,-which
is greater thalK the footage I will allow them in,%.i� proposed lot line
adjustment.
FCondition: FZcas place as a condition of ,-approval that all lot lines
as shown on thy, nivi ?Ied conceptual grading plan remain as showr. In
other words, con(Iition that the front and rear lot lines be 252 feet in
r length end the side lot lines be'--31,P ' feeet ?.n length..
2. Concern: The plant material adjacent to the property lines may--'conflict
with the park plantings. The project plantings iiay not be dense
entigh to shield proposed lights from adjacent ballfield area. I,°
Condition: Condition the broject approval to require the �jriimuni.,ty
41'_17vices Department approval of the planting plan prior to pulling
ng permits.
3. Thy the residents of the dwelling units fronting on the twa�
9 ce,„, of the proposed Red Hill Commun z be impao ed due
potential noise and light glare from c.,- .jaceht park uses,
Condition: That double pane tinted glass be used in windows and that.
double thickness drywall or other noise attenuating measures be
installed in t1 dwelling units adjacent,the park area:
If you have any question== please let, me know,
cc: Jim Martin, Building
>. .Bar ry a Hanso n, Engineering ,
,
DM:ks
,
!'�-^l
3
c..
- -J
¢.
CiTy OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r-o c-A[tsn. '
I.v. 4nairman ana memoers or , -he Planning Commission
I .
FROM: Rick liomez, City Planner
.3V:" Tim J. Beedle, Senior`Planner "
SUBJECT: USE .DETERMINATION:,,---- SENIOR CITIZEN .(CONGREGATE
RESiOENTIAL.. RROJECT LOC3tlED A. BASE LINE 'ROAD, EAST OF
GFihNELIAN. IN THE OFFICE RROFES;iIONAf DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
I. ABSTRACT: In orlon is ensure that the - Development Code regulations
Will permiti all similar uses in each district, the Planning r.
Commission can determine whether a use not 0ecificalTy listed as
permitted, secondary, accessory or temporary use in any district
shall be deemed a permitted use or conditional use in one or more
districts on the basis of similarity to uses specifically Tisted.
The procedures of t4is section. shall not be substituted for the
amendment procedure as a means of adding new uses to the list of
permitted or conditional ;uses.
The City Planner sh411 compare the proposed use .characteristics
With the Generii'Tlan goals and objectives as well as the„,inrpuses
of each of the use', diutrt is and Tray determine if the proposed use
should be a permi;te&.L_y' conditional use in) any of the districts
and shall nake a report' -of his findings to the Planning Commission."
II BACKGROUND: Representatives from the California Retirement Villas
Incorporated have approached the City with the cr.ncept of a Senio�r" "
Citizen Congregate Residential facility on tae south "side of Base ,
Line between the existing Exchange Building and the Cucamon "a
Chanpel. The site is designated as Office /Professional ibP}g.
Within the proximity of the site is Vineyard Part- located just
east of the site, and north of ttia site a neigfLborhood shopping
center, .
This concept of a Senior Reusing Facility has been successfully
operated in several communities in Southern California'. It
provides for congregate living fadlities witi�: all services,;'
operated under a' State licensed care facility. The facility'
typically Includes 00 to 100 residential suit6S, which consist. of-
one bedroom, liv usg room, private bathroom and no catchen. -Al I '
services in the. facility are provided -rr one fee, Wf.- ch include
furnished suite; three meals. served in a dialog facility, a game
771
`
��Hn�vx,r� vu�miY aluiv;r•
�srrrr nrrune \
Senior Citizen Congregate Residential Project
.November 14, 1584 -,-
�.-
Page 2
room with arts and crafts, personal laundry services, paid
utilities, and 24 -hour security. The facility provides lobby
rooms, beauty salons, lounges; outdoor courtyards, and or-site'
licensed facility managers. Parking is provided at a ranre of one
stall per 4 to 5 units, or 20 to 25 spaces/unit, in addition to
employee parking. In general it�.clieatdle are typically those who
are independent and, can pay a moderate price for all the necessary
,.
services and care.
Review` of other,.:commu .hies Wl ch have used this` include both
Fullerton and PlacentiaV, One community, has destined the area for
'tile
ti
residential use, while other has the facijji,y located in a
%
simijar office zo e.. V.urther, the facil,itie . na}�- used parking
standards which -have reduced parking , -from normally acceptable
multiple fa�ai11; projects without apparent problems.
Because t,,4 6aracteristics of this use are geare.0 more for the
modern e '�"me group and above, it is not .a candidate for the
Senior Citi2(�n Overlay District, Which is speci_ficax-ly- targeted to
law and moder to income clients.
II. ANALYSIS: T he. issue to be considered with this use determination
is w et er it may be considered under the Con i tJonal. Uses Permit
process as for hotel/motel "Usi§
provided � with - the
OfficefProfessionai designation. Ii; the Commission is willing to -
-
make. this consideration, then the applicant can be directed to
proceed to make their riling of an application,' The Commission can
then consider the merits of the project and any specific location•
Thr�'usi is typical Yy\\associated'within a residential 'hotel +or motel
for cok grpgate living ,powever, that defined use js not cant^ ned
within the Development. Cbde. The closest land use category toghis
use is considered either a hotel /motel use whl�;f�= s permitted " -_ ---
within the General Industrral category or cord tz ionally permitted
within the Office /Professional, or a multiple residential project
of considerr<bly higher density category. The options' available to `
theCommission,inajude the.following:
1. Proceed to consider this proposed use under
Conditional.-Use , Permit within the OfficztProfessianal
designation; or ,
2. Define the use within a residential ,category to be
considered either as a Conditional Use Permit or as
an acceptable permitted use; or
Establish a new land use group associated with a use
category which might be more specifically targeted to
Ws particular use.
-t�
o
,-
'PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
«eniar Citizen-Congregate Residential Project.
'November
14, 1984
Page 3
it ,
Because the use is a hybrid of a hotei,Imotel, and senior citizen
residential project ciAegory,,and7ls a long term residential care
facility, ii-zwoulo seem no op 1+ Ption is totally satisfactory to
"ref
meet the merits\ this art- zr use. it is -lk 1 that
P z � �. ���y
through the Conditional l'�e pk;oresr�, this type of use can be
adequately assessed per the log, "°,..Iationships ,khich are
necessary in order, to assure itt; wfl,,,U ., ��� with surroundinq
properties. r ��
Further, it would appear that the overall characteeistics olm thls
use would' be similar to that of a, hotel /motel facility with the
exception brat. its occupancy rate kuld remain consistently high+:
compared to`the more transitory population of seasonal residences;
in a hotel /motel facility, Given the nature of the population
�{
characteristics of, this project, it ap( --44 unlik:ly that this'
_
would cause a sPbstantial impact above and beyond��b.ose normally,_
attributed to other types of hotel /motel facilities, The
,
importance, therefore, of thWs- particular u"; is the relationship
=._
of that cusp: on the surrounding property and its lane :use
=,
compatipi6ty. It is morefr important, therefore, that the
Commis* -ion p nvide guidance on those charact ristf-cs which'. they
feel i,
'
e important in order to assure for land use compatibility
and td .assure that, the process, through a Conditional Usf�'Permit,
will pr6+14e for adequate assessment of the characteristics of that
project with -a its locationai criteria
The decision on approval of this use should.be considered on a case
;;y case basis because of thel-pherent site characteristics. which
will influence this type of �facrTtty. The important criteria when
considering thill type of use is the surrounding supporting
environment, such as :the proximity to stores, type of recreational:
\
facilities, office use, and support transportation, in addition te°' r
Its overall surrounding neighborhood environment consistent with
'the po-1. ties of the Senior Housing Overlay District.
i
III. RECOM;NENDATIO;: It is recommended that the Commission make a use
t
etermination That would allow the applicant to proceed wfth filing
}
an application under a Conditional Use Permit process for location
-
of a Senior Retirement Congregate Facility within the OP,
rCi
desicjnftlon,; with the follow 7ng hand use character;st`cs necessary
to it `,and use compatibihiity:'
equate surrounding uses for, rec eatio i.�:,
�,.
"Ad i
facilities. j f�
2,. 'Clo `and
and convenien¢ Support shopping office use.,:
6
_ t
,,
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Senior Citizen Congregate Residential Project
s °u
November 14, 1984,
Page 4
3— Location and `proximity to a public transportation
r
4.= Comp aI le stFrrounding neighborhood environment.
`
Based on the following findings`
The use in question is of a similar intensity to
other permitted or conditionally permitted uses in
the safe district.
- The a e' in question meets the purpose and inert of
tha di,trict in which it is proposed..
They "use in' question meets and conforms "''to the
applied ! goals and objectives -,of the General Plan.
Upon filing of a° 0- nditioW Use Permit, the application will
be
studied and reviewed in relationship to these characteristics
to
' the eyerall development purpose. '-
Re pectfu ubmitted,
.h i(
'r y
is me
i t ? ner \\ .,
RG. ns
Attachments. I,xhWlt' "Ai' - Location Map
C ihbi' "B" - sample Site Plan
31
t
N jt a
`I
RCALIEORNIA' "
i2ETiRE1vIENT
VILLAS. INC.
April 17, 1985
Planning Department
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Subjects Villa del Rey ~'
Villa del Rey will be a ;s 11 service Ptetirement
facility for active elderly peg�ple. All residents will
be am�'dlatory and ..able to functt,�on on their own. The
residents will be people,who noiVlonger' can live alone,
but a"Qfpot want to live with a` "relative, dive in an
apartif_.- ,m or live in their o home. Based on past
exgesi 6ce, the ma.,'4rity of -, residents will have immediate
family within a tern mile radius of the facili:ity. The
average age of residents will be 7 °j to " years old.
The fac ilii y' p consists of a ��
proximately 100 units
with private bath. Also. the facility will have a L .
central dining room, central kitchen, lounge✓, ",library,
beauty shop, and a small private dining room for guests
of residents. There will be r_o` cooking facilities. in the
individual units
The facility will be staffed 24 hours a day, seven
days a week. The staff will provide all meals, an activity
program, a van for •transportation.and supervision of tfis
residents. The staff also will do personal laundry,.
cleaning of the individual units, "`changing of linens and
any other things necessary for the comfort of the residents.
Staffing of the facility will consist•.of an' Adminlstrator,
;(ssisy�pt Administrator, Activity, Directory kitchen and
bQusek,. Ping personnel,' and a maintenance Stan, All personnel
+films be trained by us prior to employment. Day staff will
t
be 5 to 9 employees and after 6 p.m. there will be 2
employees on duty.
J
k
lj
Oft) 751 *T4d� t}J
„y.
r (f+g
AWL
Based on our eaperienF ' --7 to: ?,,O tepr conb��of the .I
total residents may still 2 A:We theiI own car. Our van
will be-used to,transport residents for shopping" trips,
outings, doctor office visits and °any other necessary trips.
Because of the age of residents and the services that are
grc�v dpd, use of .their car is not recess
ary. Consequently
Parking requirements for ouc type of facility is
substanti,aily less than what an apartment complex or ai
.regular hotel would require.
The facility will be fully sprinklered, have smoke
detectors and a fire alarm system. Alsag all units tall
have an emergency call system that is monitored by the i.
staff. In',the event that a resident has a probltim;'a pall
a£ a cord 4hich is located in the bedroom and one in the
bathroom, will send a signal t') the main panel," at which
time an employee will respond to rletercnine their problem,
,At this timef the employee will cUl the paramedics if the
condition of the resident indicates that help is necessary...
The facili
ty sa,,�l.l bye licensed by the Oepartment of
Health, Community Care ticensir•g, State of California,
Based on our experience, approximately 40 to 45°; of our
resident s may require their medication to-'be supervised.
i,Under the licetise for community Care, we t,►ilI be allowed
)J to supervise the medication. under a doctor s:Prescriptlon
for those residents that their doctor feels are not able
to supervise their own. These medications_ are the type
that,:.shoul.d be taken by an elderly person on a continuing
basis. Under our license, a`-- medical person is not
necessary to Perform this function, but our Administrator
will be experienced and 'rill be responsible for the pro•pe,
' supervision of the medications.- The medications will be
controlled in a locked
room, authorized Personnel
will have access to them.
We will not have any medical. personnel on our staff
because we vriri l not house anv residents who require medical
care or sup vision. The resident must be able to function
on their Ow U, dress, bathe, -come to the dining room -for meals, 1
and Participate in activities. In the
no longer can be independent and live event that a resident
under cur requirements,, ,
we will work with the family to find a proper facility where
a resident can receive the necessary care.
}
.; LM
' M
AIM .A.
op
IDS
LM
—71 M
GC m I
am,
j� uI Gi
t
CrIly OF -
RANCHO CUC,` XIONGA TITLEt �---_
PLANNING OINTISIO-,� E.LH?131T= A
S L- o
f:
i
VILLA ®EL REY
_
RETIREMENT HOTEL
1.
PROPOSED RETIREMENT $OTEL
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
OALWORMA REMEWHr WAS, INC.
7 i nuzATI0N MA?
_ .. ur.wei:rnscLL�kuk
_
NORTHvv
CITY OF
r , 111T r(T ITEM TITLE._
Ask
,'t PLANNING UIVISIaN
>rxI -IIB c =- !- SCALE, -�'i
xi
SNQFPNU tENTER �. � NM,R 5CNQOd PARKiN@ ( y
W�L__ IC CMWEWM +�++wa- Ma.Yrr it`L
Surma
.w.n Wi
r°ia ;.., t (E b C014Ttt iMr�f i'EA
t sTWKt1 t&
U. dw I rnavrtn �:
Ir
Ac
ct�cE aueowa °�s
nK)lZrH
CITY OF
RAINT 0 CUC� Alff�N A TITLE=
�J.ra Y
PLANNING DIVISICXN EXHIBIT
fl
t
t fill
CITY
� l`
RANCHO O ' O � T ,
PLANNING I31� 11I-qi0NT EXHIBIT.--'! � SCALD
k G -DI
r
t
wsEUV� Roes
� ,��•�' � srw�Ra4=++ar� tanssa
r. PARRW
- •i • •{ +oNr �� creel w«.rw=...rw.w} -
I {
. :� i YcM _ • �sY�eM.s�P�/bM DNR9fY.0 �
1 1
( 4
IC
r A R It
CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN
SCALE V SS'
f Yy���V,}
�i INORM
a
CITY OF
I' A1�1 II�TG DIVTStON
n
_ cr
a
i
EH U
Im
\ r.i
Ul EH
_ =t At .a
EH
�,• ,, EMB. 1.
I
2
i�
v. {
L
f
i45A ,
LUi
gym
i its
.v jo
LLI=
w
j
r 13 A A
i Tt'PIC/ L - bbl UNI T
4-02.-
:• �°1LGON1'c GONCIT�IN
i4-
z6 S7uSJs , P•T.r.1
VILLA DEL RED
EVE= I�sl.a sIt -pc ^ ,.
CITY OF ITEM.=per 7
RA1�?CuQ CUCAyMOI4 A -`, ---
TITLE -._ '.
' .�4NTt1Ii4r DIMSIC. N EXHIBIT K �L_IKsC;ALIr ✓''
D.b
i
h. 3o' -bSr �i -fin
1 6} -aM 5' -a� t 2'i6�_3�•'Sn' 2r: 3°
.i xxe srut2y
Ell
A• � r F11'{' ! �y
TML��N 1'el`tDIT N t
I IN4�LATIUIS IN.p1:.L t
2 `'• o�
o �
e,
S
�r 1
14- 1
I
1 -
7,7a
'�
.. �.T�.� rlxifrvcy
ALL. MTI•ISWM
VILLA ®EL. RE
UNIT 'Dt { CacCONy t.P.-Veil
l /'fir, �Ir.an FORTH
CITY OF
lie 'RANCHO CUCAMONGA. TITLE= -JqAA
PLANNM DIVLSMaN EXHIBIT: •'
�-- _ Z� SCfLLE --
CITY OF RA;CCHO CU' 'Im NBA
--
PART 11 - INITIAL STLTDY
EWIRONMENT41 CHECKLIST
APPLICANT
FILIING DATE: 2-7 ' "# LOG NUM$ER
PROEM OJECT: l
PROJECT* tJ YT
PROJECT LOCWA ION.
® l� L9 7
I. ENVIRO`MENTAL T- MPXCT5
(Explanation of ail "yes" and "maybe ". answers are required
sheets).
r.
on attached
XES MAYBE NO
J.. Soils and Geoloftv. ; �GJ',? the proposal have
sigrtiricant
result; in:
a, Unstabig i ground cocditinns or in changes in
geologic relationships:-,
b. Disruptions,, displacements,'compaction or
burial
of the soil?
j
c. .Change in topography-or ground surface
contour intervals?
✓
d. The destruction, covering or modification
of any unique geologic or
physical features?
e• Any Potential in� ease in wind or 'water
erasion -of
soils;�affectiug either on or 'Off
site conditons?
f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition?
g.' Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such
�?
as earthquakes, landslides; mud-
Aides, ground` failure, or'similar haza_rds2
5
h. An #trease in the,rate of extraction and /or
'
use of eny minarai resource?
21. HYdrol0 .twill the proposal have significant
rz°
results in.-
v
Page
2
YFS :; —!VY IE NO
a•
Changes in currents, or the course of direction
of flowing $L-
.gams, zivzrs, or ephemeral stream
.channels?
_
b.
Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the late and
amount of surface water
runoff? �
c.
lateration to the course or flow of f ' 106,
,waters? �t ���
d.
Change in the amount of surface water in an_v, ;
body of water?
_
e.
:Discharge into surface waters, or any
alteration of surface
water quality?
f.
- Alteration of groundwater characteristics?
g. ,
Change in the quantity of groundwaters)
either through direct additions or with-
drawals,
or through interference with an
aquifer?
`
Quality?
Quantity?
h.
The reduction in the - amount of water other-
wise
C
available for public water supplies.?
III
i.
Exposure of people or pr party to water
related hazards
such as flooding or seichea?
3. Air Q, u_ ality. Will the koposal' have significant
results in: ..
A.
'Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile
or indirect sources?
Stationary sources?
4Y
b.
Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or
interference with
the attainment of applicable
air quality standards?
e.
Alteration of local cr regional climatic '
conditions, affectir
/air movement, moisture
or temperature ?'
4., Biota
Fipra.
in : Will the proposal have significant results
'
a.
Change in the characteristics of species,
.,
including diversity, distribution, cr number
r,
bf any ,species.; of plants?
b.
keduct�04 of the vtimbers of any unique
fix endangerecy- species of plants? , rare
r✓
2
-a�
"may`
µ
YES X10
c. Introd7icton of new or disruptive species of
plant) Ini.,
an aria?
d. ?Reduction in the potential for agri cultural
production?
Fauna. Will the proposal_'have'significant results
^mot`
a. Change ixe the cl��racteristics of species,
3nclud 4ng diveretty, distribution,
K
or numbers.
of any species J�f animals'?
i�. 'Reduction of the numbers Of any unique, rare
or endangered
,f/\
species of animals?
®�✓
e. Introduction of new or disruptive species of
animals into
an area, or result in a barrier
to the migration or movement of animals?
-
d. Deterioration or 'removal of ?existing fish or '
wildlife
habitat?
5� Population. Wis_Z the proposal. have significant
results in:
'
a. Will the proposal alter the locatiQr!� distri-
buticn, density, diversity, or
grovth rate of
the human population of an area?
b. Will the proposal affect��)existing housing,, or
~
-=
create a demand for additional housing?
i. 5ocie-- Economic Factors. Will the proposal have
significant
,results in.
a. Change iu local or regional socio- economic
characteristics, Including
,e...R
economic or
commercip.1 diversity, tax rate, and property.
_
values?
,r
b. Wi,11 project casts be e uitu
among
project beneficiaries,bi ea, buyers,
tax payers or project users?
7. Land Use and Planning Considerations., Will. the-
proposal have significant results in?
a. A substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area?
t
r
`�..
�f
'
conflict with any designations, objectives,
"
policies, or adopted plans of any governmental
entities?
C.' An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of
L. M
existing consumptive Or no'- consumptive
�
recreational opportunities.
.
(�}
Page 4
T �-,,saortation. 1
'tE5 MAYBI -� Igo
r 'the proposal: time significant
r�e� lt. in. �t
a. Generation of subsfiartial additional vehicular
movement?
b• 'Effects on existing streets, or demand for
"r
new. street construction?
C. Effects on existing Parking facilities,'' or demand for
new parking? F
✓�
d, Substantial impact upon existing transporta-
tion systems? r`l'
e. Alterations to present pal� �tns of sirc 3a> '
Lion or movement of people 'andlor .foods?
ii
f- Alterations to or effects on present and
Potential cater - borne, rail, mass transit or
air traffic?
j
g. Increases is traffic hazards to motor- ��s -;Ies,
bicyclists
s
or pedestrians?
9. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal, have
significant results in:
a• )disturtance to the ititegrity o? archaeological,
'
Paleontological, and /orrhistorical resources?
r
10. Health, Safetv, and Nuisance Factors. Will the
proposal. have significant results in:
at. Creatioa of any health hazard or potential health
hazard?
b. Exposure of People to potential health hazards?
c. A risk of explosion or r:_:ease of hazardous
substances in
the event of an accident?
d• An increase in the number of individuals
or species of vector or pathenogenic
organisms or the exposure of people to such
organisms?
e. Increase in exi t{g na� se levels?
—
`
f.� Exposure of People to
P potentially dangerous
noise levels? -�-
-, °%
f�
8• The creation of objectionable odors?
--'
• h. An increase in light or glare?
'
k
i
*
1
gY► Whrn feasible
ren �e s0urtes of ener � available? � jare F
'�
t _ P
Page
YFSAiSL t'iti
11, Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant )
)
res.kltu in: `
` - -�
a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic
vista o
or view?
b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive
site?
c. A conflict with the.oM ective of designated
o
or potential Scenic corridors? m
12. Utilities and Public Sef.. rvces. Will 'the proposal.
have a significant'4teed n
new systems or
alterations t4 he folio =.rings
Electric power?.
Ia. E
b. Natural or packaged gas? „
„f
c. eomaunicatlons systems? ?
r,
d. Water u
t supply?
e. Wastewater facilities? ,
,
f. Flood contxol structures?
C. Sclld waste facilities?
h. Fire protection? .
i. Police protection? f
f,
J. Schools?
k, Parks or other recreational facilities?
1. Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads and flood con"PI facilities?
J
M. Other gc±vernmen.'sa1�'4;rervices?
13. Enercv and Scarce Resources, will the f�
have significant r
results in p
a. Use of Substantial or excessive fuel or energy;
b,, Substantial increase its demand upon existing �
sources of energy? �
�✓`
�/ a
c. An ,increase in the demand for development of
mat n
new sources of energy? .
.
d. An increase or ptzpetuation of the consumption
of riot- renewable forts, of en
er
Page 6
l�
YE",
;�-AY11'E Na
e, Substantial ddR14tion`of any nonrenevable or
scarce
,+
natural resource?
14. Mandatory Find+nc,s
of 5iezificance.
a. Does the project have the potential to degrade
th$ *quality of
0
'3
the environment, substant Ally
reduce the habitat of fish or wildli
a species,
cause a fish or wildlife pop•'Ll tion drop
below self sustaining levels, threat to
eliminate a plant or animal communit
the number or restrict the
reduce`
range of rare or
endangered plant or, animal oY e lmin e
Port+t examplea of a major pe - ds ofs�`k
Calif nia hist�y or eh
story?
b. hoes the project have-the potential to itChieve
short -term,
to the disadvantage of longrterm,
environmental goals? (A short -term i,ppitet on the -
environmentas one which occurs in a'
brief, definitive
atively�
pericd� of time while
term impacts will endures well into the
long-
future)
»
c, Does the project have impacts which are
�� `
Individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (Cumulatively consdderat.le
cans
that the incremental eff,—_i� of an
individual
project are considerable whkny!viewed
in
connection with'rhe effects of past projects,
1
and probable future projects).
d• hoes the groj ect have environmental effects
which w7
cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or Indirectly?
II. DTSCUSSTaN nr rm Tp^v%4 ,__ LVALI?.#TTQV ._
(i.e., of aYfirmative
the above questions plus discussion
aUswews --to, '
a of propoSC ` =Itigatian measures),
a
j
r „.
Ixx. DETt—tM;
On the basis of this
Initial, evaluations
."
I find the proposed Project COUL: NOT have a significant effect
W! the environment, and a XZGA,TZVE D£CZAZATZO,, will be preparsci
Z find that although the proposed project could have -a signifi'aant
. effeat on the environment, there Vill not be a significant effect
in this case because the mitigatior, measures described on an
attached sheet have been added to the project.
DECLARA A yEGATZ"r
TZOa W1U BE PnPAPXD. o
I find the proposed FrajectL4Y haysignif ' nt of ect on the
s
enN`itzment, and an EXMo.rak NT DD?A
RI i;required.-
Date1
Signature
Title
,
L V
ia�.. =:.c_*.�.S.Si.. Y.�r_.;: .._ .. ...7.+G�..:.ed`ti {,:.t �:. _Si08k',"•. f r
i
Addendum to Initial Study, Fart 11 ,
The development of this project will modify the nat��ral contours
by 9radir4 the site to accommodate a
a multi - level, facility .-
cnnsisting of 2 and 3 levels in the r
rear portion oiK building.
However, the mount of cut and fil'i for the \ s
site is
insignificant to cause adverse environmental imPacti, The
construction of this project will c
cause the filling of a natural
creek to the west of the site. However, an underground drainage
pipe will be Thstalled in, p
place of t
Although the project site..is not within, but adjacent to an ar
in the south that is subjected to P
Potential liquiefaction andea ',,
subsidence, the required soils study should address such
necessary it gat on measures at the plans check process. for and
Hydrolouv�::
2 b: T
The cd:tstruction .of this pro*,, will increase the amount of
paved surface area which could result in a
an increase in the
amount of surface water runoff and a decreased in the absorption
rate. However, the proposed drainage s
system for this project
will handle this increase.
NNW
Addendum to Initial S' tudy, Part II
page ,f2 \,
Health, Safety and Nwi:can;e Factors
k 10 fv The project site is impacted by road noise from Base Line Road
as well as the crowd and loudspeaker noise from future park and
> future soft :ball field. Therefore, the development of this
j project will expose its residents to potential dangerous levels
of noise. A noise study has been prepared by an acoustical
consultant firm, BBT Laboratories, to investigate the degree of
impact and provide or mitigation measures%as follows,
I, Road Eloise: „
1) „Title 25 of the State Administrative Code
requires anoutdcor to indoor noise level j
;= not to exceed 46 CNEL, Although the
conventional, construction details of this
. Project,, may suffice and comply with this
requi:raA*nt, a br rf study to conform this'
notse level will be required at the
corritruction, PIahs c'- ec"rocess.
Z) For i�a arborlgazebo /pci areas a `contin us
6 foot solid barrier fenJe (at lgast 4 lbs.
per square foot) should WAnstafled around i
this recreation area from Base Lin`' Road nd
extending south along the east property line
to the .proposed opening to the Red Hill.
Paris.
3) `A w'aterf'all or water fodhtain q sufficient
size `a�to create_ some. noise isf its own
around the recreation area.
11. noise from Red Hill Cvnity Park ��� �`
1) Double glazing with at least 2 inches
_ airspace in separate 'frames should be
installed to .bring down interior noise
level.
10 b. The development of this project may expose its residents to
potential light and glare from the future Red., Hill Community
Park. To mitigate such adverse Impact, double pane tinted glass
and dense lalidscaping should be provided to the east and West
side of the building.
{
4
RESOLUTION NO T
.,\ A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. "85 -0E FOR A 104 UNIT �r
`
RETIREMENT HOTEL LOCATED AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF BASE LINE JI
ROAD, 700 FEET EAST IN THE OFFICE PROFESSIONAL DISTRICT
WHEREAS, on the 13th day of March, 1585, a complete application Was
filed by California Retirement Vill�j, Inc, for revi.eW of the above- described
project; and
WHEREAS, ;nn the 8th day of May 2985, tL -Lncho Cucamonga Pianni4q
Commission held a public hearing to consider the abickye,- described project.'
NOW, THEREFORE, "the Rancho Cuc�nonga PTannfng, commission resoived as
follows:
�1
SECTION I: That the .flawing fit:dings can tie met:
1. That tEr' "proposed use io in accord with-the General
Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, ,,,,-And
!
the purposes of the district in which the site is
located.`
,.
?. That the
proposed use, togethef. Ath the conditions
app i'oable thereto, will not ba'Idetrimental to the ,
public health., safety, Or WE,fare, or materially "
injurious to_
properti�Es or improyements in, the
vicinity.
3. That the proposed use com plies. with each of the
applicable provisions of6che Development Code.
SECTION 2; That this project will not crease adverse impacts cud the
envirorment or on the public health Rwd safety, or
cause nuisance to residents
because the identified mitigation measures have been added to the Project and
Conditions
of,,Apuroval as described in Section 3. and that a 'Negative
Declaration is issued on May 8, 1985.
SECTION 3: That Condition�3 ,'tse Permit ha. 85 -06 is approved
subject to the foi owing c:�nditions:
Planning Division:
2. The. north` elevation sh1 be improved by designing the long
01 linear
roof overhangs at a steeper angle that strengthens thf�:;
appearance of the roof element. J
MF
Conditional Use Permit Mo. 85 -06
Page #2
1;
2.
The required Soils study shall be ^equired to adCress U6,
potential liquefaction and subsidence '�nd shall be submitted
with the rough grading plan for review aid approval prior 1.4
`
issuance-of any permits.
,
3,
.,
A noise study„ to confirm the conventional construction details
of this project rill s ffice in complying with the 45 'Mi.
noise level per Title 25�'shali be required at the construction
plan check issuance
f
process prior'lo of building permits,
`.
f 4.
"
A continuous 6 fact barrier /fence at 4 lbs -. per square foot,.
that wraps arouns -`the recreation area 'fr ,m the north ar `-ythe
east side shall' be provided.
5.
A waterfa.l or waterF ' -,fountain of sufficient size shall be
provided to the recreation area so as to create sound•11mask" of
Its own and to mftigate the Fhysica`d and psychological effect
of the traffic noise. }
6.
Double glazing windows" with i.:: least 2 incises airspace in
separate frames, double thiclknp�ss drimali m¢terials and other
noise attenuating measures shall be utilized, and installed -for '
the,.dwell-ing units located to the south and east side of the
budding.
7.
Double pane tinted glass in addition to blinds or opaque
draperies shall be installed for tha dwelling units blocaied to
the youth and east side of the buiidingt +a mitigate light and
glare trom,the future park. 4_ti
s
S.
Dense landscaping, shall be provided to t;,e south and eagp
elevation for protection of wino, sun, ligilt and glare. M
,
detailed landscaped plan,sha -11 be reviewed md: approved by the
-Community Service Department prior to iss'iiance- of building
permits,
9.
A lot line adjustment will be required for the exchange of a,60
foot w:de• strip, of land to the east and west side of =the
project site. The developer shall coordinate with the City's
Community Service DoparVant ".in completins sk lot line
adjustment prior.,to issuance of building pe ✓hits. the final
lot dimensions for the project ,,ite shall b6 252 feet (north
and south property lines), in `y idth and 31 ,: �feet� f. "length
feast
and west property lines),
F;,aineering Division•.
e
I.
The proposed driveway on Baseline Road "411 `liiign with the
existing "exit" driveway from the Alta llama High school parking
lot i
+� Condition4l Use Permit No. 85 -06
= Page M
2. An urderground.s'eorm, drain shall be � hbe ovided along the-westerly
boundary of the site extending' from existing culvert: under-
Base Line Road to the south property boundary.. The storm Arai4
sha'l a be = designed to be compatible 'witty the f_uture;storq i rain -, j
within',the park site, l
` 3. A minimum 12 foot wide pavement'shall be 'provided for thei`l storm
drain. It shall be gra?ed' relatively level and
obstacles for access by C t;{ mai,itenance vehicles.
APPROVED -AND ACOPTED TH11 & /ll D�Y OF MAYa 1985.
PLANNING.COMM7SSTOWOF_THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
$Y:
Donnis L.- tout, Chairman
ATTEST:
Rick Gomez eputy secretary
J
I, Rick -Gomez, Deputy, Secretary of, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly;and
regularly introduced pas,�ed, and adoated 'Sy the Planning `Commission'sf the
City of Rancfo Cucamonga at a regular meeting ofthe Planning Commissibn held
on the 8th day of May, 1 85, by the following vote-to-wit: c>
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: _
ASSENT: : COMMISSIONERSt
a
a
f^
h c �
6iy dy d Oy�.pk
OGO.p
ONg 6�
y4q
aO.E G
E� Ca=•�d U�9 u
.�.R+�+
COY n t�bO'
xv
V Lc C L
�6
-C°' 6�
uM
CT
vn °�'.i
LVrf�>
Y .e•.LdY-
CVd
�°Y`
6o
n�a,e
Z
y.n �ndm cMw °acj
w
of v °noa
a
g
V
av tt.�- C�d��+.
G
23
� t`�da
b 9
t a
J4
6
N »
u O
--
u t'
Onuo
-.AU
_--Z
Eed•°•
,may
6 L r
AC Ub G°
°60y
j4
N6 u�a
a
'�t:iT'
EM
a•-• ,^�
p.TE rQ Uy.
G.t7fb0
9.qi
x ° ny ^C
°i O•y •3S1
T•^
iy »
dax
' -iC°.b O
La Nv pd q
A W w»
•d
.°GbT�•�
bU ?4Cl
^�Vy
N�q.aOn�+�
NE
L T°
ZL L
°
au�0
a°iyU EG' y.
i
d E
M: 6ipp0 O.�
QG d£CidY
wdyUC
RQb
V9C Et° ,.!
< °
a
cSt: xd °.�> L
M dY9
� a
M
�+ �
--6
-.�°
'tea
na•l� \4
Ow
�d •o...
Yv
N
C E
6�uo 69 x »LRF O
TaII�»
M
CYxG W�.Yµ
<O is A'
T.
ht OL 6V
n
V
d
-
�
T
a
°
411va °1w ao
tzELpq
a
1
p
4
1; v
Ey
{
d
S
L u
r• p
6 y
a
U. 4t ^
°= a
Yb
^Vd p
o
«N
cKgodn °!u
C
6 E SUOy
F
O 2
+.
p
S
l�
4
L C A
.••i
q�.N W9.a dw»Ei � 'iJ
�1
al.+ E
••.
J.
W
TA
Vi Y
». N
O L > 6
4�+...: 6
L NC
q LV
oNN EVC y Jr�
»
gs0 ¢
�..q
GVU••x' -.2-4
r
N (•f
G9 gw qY..T
t
L•�uT Yb Yaa
ro LE wa
E,aa b
Lw.n4 Li O�
Ea )e n
VAG6N ^6 ..Y.
OR N N
A ro� y!• `
NCN4 0
}
%%
n Y w
CE V .N 0 Q 9 0 O Y N pw:
M a'}
£ .p Tl. O.
Y • .2 N q b
Q
Ay �. w Nu'UQ yt
�O�y qr0 qq
E M 00
q
.4 EV._
4..
r �.� OS A'wO.ro wY 4r
oo ¢,Q.Yq NN.
a1 p„Q_LO ¢Y
� Ea w
¢:s • Q. Ous �°AM
oc> aNFi Yw^
... n� ��
6OM LO
=y4 CAOC•.,4 ita;
Ci r..
l
o:3i.'" Ty% =N
L`.,.,,.
L M3 b v0
V.
4J
V
u. L
a
Aa�.�.p
ro�Y. ro Nye. N.K f�
GOwE.. M S "'•
yqc Sm
b �• St K^
L W H
E.
w �b � ,SS
.P7
W N
��,� O >w
9YGY
EQn� 9Y.G =y�Yi^
fi_>
CA a�N�pwy VN
sL10T�nvC
NY
n
N OO
ZC..�n'N �E> FNRN
Fv� AUa OE
Ow #w9a �9
4
�¢'
rn�„• EGN G
72
II.Cp NNdYO YY�
w '� Y g a Y P O Y
C�USL� Yp
� y. "' y, A Q
g-9
GE^>w
♦
N
9 � E Y .G N
a ca y Y 'EQ 4 smyL any
k 4@y >"OQ p �•` L
kT �e%TUL TndN
>CC3..6
> tT Y i Of - 9 O� • //
� 'O YZfq�A N (�
.0 P +ra 6
4t OC N V•\ � IQn !• H' N} 2 S N Y [O.l
G C 4 N M r 6 ��
I O C K L q � b� vR 6 d
`
Y
i
Y} wVY 1yM
�949Wro.
9QCCCCCC Gam`8
Qi Yr
u
LLV q ~4Y tl� c6
9 y� GLN
OD OS wp�`jC
a� tY
�
L
�_ w •n d~
L L
'aa E- T yr
;.'LC I
k
W
H.,
v
N y \_ C
.fir _
`y �_.>,•N�� QR�..Y aT' o
C N� C L Y Y E
v i�'� v° �`..aa, G
C C y C 4� � q
r°• b t, a �„� o
Y 7
NE N E i
U .
m
�
BE:
•"�T
6fp N �.: Y
Y; i4Y
w 'Cl L U N C E.•Q. N Z 6
Y
' L U -t. G 4 A u
LO C
L E 4 w
aM
arac
—y:a�w Sao
FF
G•c N'�
S
S Y -G �.>�y O• LOy.
a Y e�
C U. q.G yq
w L L OLG
ANM�Y NCC}u
G Z;
Od A o
6b
u
E 60AY
EM7
'O Md
V
C
�t9
W�
w 6-A ¢S 4
'. Y=�} Nar..q
Q
LYo
F Ywti =O
•Y
^GE
yN pC1i. �.
{„•�'q A.L c}a�M,J V
.
p KY
o E
qr
yp C O
h.� b �aa 'wuux
U �dw U
�� 9� yGU •
~nO�EYEC
q.tlr <O y�t 7y
�,�aa
^3j.�
bA
y Q t, i
u.�4� Ltr9t GOb C�}
D yE } O P G O •! b U
�GLY Ab
A S Y t m A b� Y
GOC>�.��,� Goa },LM
Y O!�r Y L A C 9
i
}a
(6
a'C .-II,
G er9N0 Dt+ wL
1�+M6 l�r NQago Gr +}+adiC
KO NiA
b}A OY...G.9>
Y /� -QL LQ.GLiY`Yw
CV' 1 gndaM ^@
Oy > C4.f 6 >. y
Yq.:Y Vpik Y06a0a F.Q�
L
4
HLY nGW
E
� �
�
� ,,;_'� ... � �.-• r�
['a to ,� �f �
f ,�
�'
t � „ aano aQ c. �y �� n�ncdw�nu iqp Gs ad
td uY ..a N._'. OIL q� qvn OCJ O. Vut, .C..�da' cV bQ
NLRB Wa �ttGi GG q�_p�rnn atgACR A d.M9 Eq�i �_ I
Ya a d~ d
ig..0 M� 14-w C� W ^ydn Ot OLt.� ELC'G >t ggYp
q Y�O. R d d p 4 O r.. d^ p > ,•� i 0 U4 t N m p
C W m O #yy A K V > ti-
�
Z �SGfv OJ+.^ I.R UM 'd^q ^ O4NW �ly� Via NK GK �...i YA
�... N'd GL ud �, ZL 53� >G yo`NNVR:�UaY.p 1 dy IG
dL.` aii of �' atp Gna �� 4=n oo No u�a .-a�'y •- vq.. vH•a,°G
» >1Y
•O �,�� N�u� L n •� RL YOp by-W � p� t a. y G� OMY - II
Q •�-1T b..G- PO d0 AAG N� AML tT �pyMQd � O'Cw Et L�y�
W � .C� da. pCYY tM agyH0.671 �µG iM Yq A d 3�M�
O�WO �' C YL K � OR�C n1Y0G aM ddNtT
p ..per. UY Yu qm -O •... i
�_cYm. O Y Rx .gyp Y^ 4NLCCy L Ay0 m ^'Q.w+aN
E�y� YCT uN KT CVV a Nq K`vdp Ot.y n.0✓ dli ay t-
gULO �� O _6Ak +-K 6ae RDY C NLG glti. UN �
Y
L ddb Ea 'JG 4U� tau n�4Nd pd'O �� 1S. b� T� If
Lt
4 d G L C T C L d NOR
Y d d r I E L .c M y L L r •r . tT . V
�wquyi. CK dvRi �NO�t�w,L •f�N Vr' ^iT >pG 6Q. 6q�-06 •LW .li.pg6�.
N r N
(/f
C a O LCn. -q O L O� C O�rO L d G Y
n q n
z dC »:A.
C b
MhT aC qc Op. Ny G i.trn 0.a
ram .apt kab
p b^ $3 � �G n...y d'
d
a LA ...yn MO ..'µGM
S U ab .�
q L G t M •q„ � Eq. •-. q q d a> � q L � ¢.
R O
NAaOd
C Ygaa � „. OI yN Oa u
!� nN qfr M r AU M Ate. rygN RO QG. U dni'='.
ova �vq h i� 'a5- na ':a •`v 'OO �a.Ne.. .�e.d�
+ L E AOE i�OEi'
-dd G4•^ad M G, E M R .•.4N 6y QgL1f. Odgy
^ ~ CL N 4 O
q i�4 L S 5t M !Op a RY�03p NV
q •+ •w
r• '•_ N N V aci J y n 0 ,N LSO p
yOq m N •+J. ��, » W W�Gr 'O.. GA �aMA.E
Eud ua�
n
G O� O OWC aLN K Yn yT4 t,
O iV
Lgpp q.N 1 U 6vV Nb Sd • L� 4, 9lc y.0 4p�tlC
r •y L q. p .Cb N m✓ V Y y q SN Y y u tqt C N: M
W r T O"` C ka
O �9 OU »C q BOG .� Wq 4Y A 'jLn O'C • r4l%^ �'u 'Y'
6C•I� }� A+q V' n i4N K O4d4 r K �'nyA Vgl�id
^,G7W ��ii� v. xi % .cW OLi cM � '. q•"„°.v watw° -'4.L
1 :cYwa sgy-m a;;'nz i-R
nw :cu aq t-o ��q spin +uLa AOp
W 'G KNnA nR+•Vt Y+r
tz
A i{
D tlr
:f V� 4q CCq ac 'rU V ....�
r u
�bq y0 rII+l YS 4.± O a Cq
3,
v.w g. ycc v ♦tea -.°E�� i e` •E• ,°�. �. ar �v o. ♦ a°
' 9a ^ ^qE L3 Nib U. °VO6. dEtVq �.Y U q O
U r4a G> Cvdi2 ^CV = A v �4YwY4d 2?rQ r ipy
dui �Q.Q Y � YLO j ��NU L=Vd4/ CCL� O D«
w O
Q yy u
VdO �LC11rH �i EEw !S-. UV q -4p �p VrY "'. �y
GOb�gapMY
Ft
N L t� d b. T c CFL" O tJ �P q Y
2.5 O
Gi�a4 M ^y ^s v zL
Do =oG Ep _
uON`_ ur= r -OICOn q.V.,V 2v O.a C'Q aI�V ^��atq G =s
_ 6E Oar V u 3
r b u r' C3W t.,•y Y� W OuA�.r 3Cw+. � >GO l3
V O= Y V q V Y.U. O C i GGL C V C
^a Nom^ 6 =4 O V .y 1� I.
r atlr >S � dyt"aW pietlr�VV�a E N pm
N
r.
C Ey �L qE NyY yr.
Un }eDIIi
CG V a �.IIw wy..
Y 1� m� N H< G U Z L L C L T i n E Fr b V T a+ � C n
NQ1= YN_NYY4�L Lq da4.N b+�gw.Ct�r' N 6.Yp
' V I
1 (i
^Qi♦ ?lC� mtiy ae ^O Nb tly. tlMa •VM .p ar Rt %c
F Lb u C
yLf C Lp
O
� 49: Q' b. O16 OJrb 0 S 6 bN Ord V,°ya °.
^ 4 b a C m V y
^d
#WW2 aqC q�^ Q.. T L GgLU°t�. ap�. O IIL ygj
q t MA «L.O S �OOwG -. NQ II V q b G 6.:oµ
al
2 2
LT G.± GQ 4u . yd Eq Air Aq E.La 4tA.Q„
OwOC LQ.O
ESL^ r2 •6 Cb '° _WQA NL
�L.LC G OmA M NYai. rt Ly D' JC FL
Vw. ^ 6 p ^L Cu
aa2 �y'L c .° v N*, L �o1v ♦i ti ^+.�L
MG
Z. W
-C ma �,Z:
�A
i c aW a
' CAp 'ua li qqr L LC v^^Y. b a.qC D� GG�� �CUr Yrir26 �N�L
^a2cY GNb as ax q° GN♦+ LYE $t V...W �...yL
sW= Taq c
.i[VTG l..Y. <Y mr0 Sy.,., A W CGO p,d. CNC W qNL NNYC .,
�f qA
L� Y IIr
1- �gF1VU }HN� 3 JL � (�q•^q•• KLm��p°V tYWbN 62 6Y'NV
jj
9Q
vcO
GO1 «s
L
Njl� j9 fi
L v�
a
u
N
ff C�
IIVV /J
p
y.
C
Q�
+^,✓aptl »L
Gq=
L�
3 L
�
dtT�
•+4y
A 4 E
•� \•°j1 A q
.c
N..a-
G y
b
1'
q u o "-•
Q,�
LF
iK LYM pI.
6NL
4Q.y
IQ L
a
°G'n'
'Cd4
O
Q 3
N
�cTEy
4y...QC.
T{'A
W.N Ca+a A'
4��C,
�
O y6
bwA
r
cL 6yY
r�
n
raai
N
EYE
jfi[
Ep
O Fc
<�
w
dN'!1.03ar.
°
aallAx pia to NM'
CN ..aG
aVdai�
bCM N.
afi
b
Qg ^
.V
Y9'•� -Lm
wwa=a •'
aCi
9
aA
LOL
�V E x�d0AGL�
ytit
O ?
0
L
Q 6N
N..
bap Y..S
b «d
LLm3f°
6CuG OfA
p7
Zi
°p
YY Lr
J
:O
a
G
GQCw
Gr
rL„ LL 44
M bdQ
Uci)
Y
LC
i
.pN
AG
Y4�G-
C M
01 u
��CM
L
Y
NO
P� �
®Q
dur '.•.
�Q
L _ L
01�.
y „,N
Q 2U
�VmG
gN
� — ."z-G.
yaLWq
'
y�m.
pa
?q OC
V4V
Y
pO
p)� c
audio
-493
sue
G
br
�6
N
3�0rL
�y�6+aLA�
Q.
ratC
NnpM1
Nv �_
a"y«Q
9
a
Nd.. ~yE
6
CuC
aNgC0
T3
�
d2
b�
V7 WV.J
.W
iy
L
G.�
� Q
V ` 4'a
>
a b.
ON
�.4. d
«LN
t°j�
A ate.
W
ay.
0.'E Q
S.
,V ^.
iuGV V:
V0
d
ti '
f"�-
A
Y
Q N
C A
'c
tlCwA
"°`
to
o L=
'O- o T
°
G r`,,G..
O�
,ro'�°•.
ZL
L.O.
�'$
VL OtkT
>O.
wQd
a Q3i
t
1'1 -
t�dar
mo3a.suQ
«b 1. h.
��!
».
4�hY C
9A
Y.V�
Oyu �y
N=a6A
40.Y
M4 V
A
ND4N�
4
MZz v
G Yd.
XO
fad
L�
7 'L�p2
<+s 6O
Qu
K�V
am
HQ SIP
j� \1 \`
71
:
4
wG° NL
_
>yV
u
Z
^ c LaY
Q a�i
a
YNQb
4 G
e°6LRy
iaV GY
N
�
TI 1
I t
Y %'ibu
a•CaTW 4 ZY
L -L
.e°.,m�i
13% �1]
W N
V.
�
L bb
Z
a Lbw
Va
T.
O My
C'�p
Oi49M i
N L.
..
SLR:;
y
a.
F
YTEr»+.. 4aQ
Y�
v ,,.r
o 4 •y
"'cn
N.n
zi
�,
.. •n,
GGC Cw
a5 R:.eu
°O L
C
C 6� bbCC
E y V F CC
.ri r AV
sm
bL�U�
VO L
C
IYvL Cw
,^SitiL. -~
..b'C
yY M
iwb��iV{M1.q
gtityy.- V.0
LL
° TQ f.°
L� y.•n- J
°�Aa GtV ..Q
�U t
T
HE
w l�
C�aa
L�
NyMG ¢y
G >y tyl
QqV b'
by �° �t
LtQy ^aaV'M
Q
zz
ayY
b�}
LT V°
V
Y
a
V Rv
4Gq�'A �`�
.A CbGQ
wi l aV
°'u 6.�ti� •O.
GT Y p
�-
Eqk
�QtS
NOO
..a3Q
b V Y
dWLLi
AM Lw�
Tv U. V y w
ry� G '� 4"
K w
VFiow
`• m
M 641U
LTJ�J
M�AYF�L
TY >n ;J
°q= »C Cr
p. V�OG
7l4 CiC
r
uEp
N-is 4Q
» "
°'t YY ��.
°ate yt ru
nuliT g�
v+
a' r.
Tit.
a1`
rvt
M
u
�
♦map
�
FE Fd
YT
e+yYo
..
v»
�
y
i'i uiaq
.L,
;
�°.w
ci,u`
_. _
.'�,
vw
o
w 4"wxRip
N ~�0
Y4
Z. 9aF
1b T
°
�WtyyN
R
4
!�
Y`R
� +RV
-sg
q
v
w aF
T
IS
y
'rb •w tr
tYb 6
GCe
@ � C E
d x'
V �� T
rw ,
6
4K 4dLY
-, WS
tswq MK
K'�i iQi.~-
u 4
r' RL NC1
\ _
a' a
a
Z'
`^ ✓«. st
4J..
W
L (.. —A
Vd
0�4.
`
^N .Ge IRb� A.rf
E.
VSY fl.
uS
C
4C
G
NaLi CC C"^ �
N
Y
A
�
Yw
CYO
JCS
3 L b N Y tl q i u
�Y Yg S
g- A
CC
.Q
'Q
x ti
6 C+
O Y a
O r °L �U Yom. Y A=
C
` L
Cif
GyYC.0
6NU Wy
'O�04 4Y �7 pu G+CVt
s�N
tlO !6
«r
O;I isa
h-4
v
♦a °O yA ° n0.
u O p
6
O
Pu
R
H Y
L
_
y ,
yuwo
ua¢
L
c
m4N d1; ry C- -N..
i
.a
0
pq`.�
L
9
C
Y
CRy C L 4 Yy
L. q E L
aQ
„
1 p
tr Gp
�
} r
O O
OQ
l
O
w� w
Oy. j `Yyn
1.
�O 33q
A
G
Y.
�«
X99. RC
Y
aW
A
ua y �
q
moo....
�y
a gip
r
KY CO
B
94C Y R v G.
pQ
<
L a,,
0a`
qC.
V
CG
u
C
.C-P
Uq LL
S E
k.
C
C Y
uA
LL
Ra yV PYy YY -
o Y p L
1
t a rr_ ''Yq
..C.
4N
YY.
�'O'V
OCS C
a N.0
FV Yom« 6R� '4
C
Nai ;w
Fy
+Er +�Z
n
m
w
14 i
CITY OF RANCHO &CAMONGA cwt
STAFF REPORT
✓j O
DATE:
May 8, 1985 `� Im
T0:
Chairman and Members of the Panning Commission
^(�
FROM:
Rick Gomez, City Planner I&
;r BY:
',Nancy Fong, Assi4ant Planner ` 1
'y
SUBJECT:
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSE MENT AND CONDITIONAi�4JSE PERMIT 85 -05 1
- rail Y'e• Thy development of a mini -W arehouse facility
con' iscon' st,* of 7 buildtngs and a caretaker's quarters
total irk'4 j5,730 square feet, on 4.5 acres ' of land In the
Mirti'mum impact.* Heavy Indds:riai District (Subarea '9)
located
. ° .
at the northeast cornar of Utl6r Avenue and th
Street
I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:`
`
A.
Action Requested:. Approval of a caretaker's quarters, sitq:,
Plan, elevations and issuance of a Negative Declaration.
h,
`Purpose: Cunstrurtian of :; a '126,730. foot mini- warehouse �l
facil,ity including office and caretakers' quarters. °1
(.
C.
Location: Northeast -eg 6r of Utica Avenue and-8th Street.
D.
C4rcel'Size: 4.5 acres. J
E.
Existin Zonin : Minimum Impact Heavy lndtstrial District
9
a
F.
Existinq Land Use: Vacant
G.
Surrounding,.Land Use and Zonina:
Industrial Park; vacant, Heavy Industrial; Industrial '
Park (Subarea E) & Hwen Avenue Overlay'Districi,
Minimum Impact Heavy In @ustriai District.
South '- Railroad tracks,-,vacant, Industrial; Industrial Park
(Subarea 6) & Haven ,Avpnue Overlay District, General
'
Industrial (Subarea I0).j
' "Industrial,
Pas - vacant; Minimum jmpact Heavy Industrial
District Subarea 9),
West - Vacant, <1 `.' "s'�ia1 Park (Subarea G) & Haer�Avenue
Overlay D-rsfr)ct `
�r ITEM H
PLANNING
COMMISSION -STAFF REPORT ,
`•
Conditional Use Permit 85.05 - Pauley
°l
ay 8, 1485
Page 2
< ,-
�,
H.
=
General Plan Designations: =
raject Site Heavy Industrial
- Minimum Impact
north
Pidustrial Park & Haven Avenue Overlay District,
tilnimum impact Heavy Industrial°
_
South - Industrial Park & Havea Avenue Overla} District,,t_
E.ene�ra} industrial, future fire station
East - Min+mum 'impact heavy Industrial
West - Industrial Park & Haven Avenue Overlay District
I.
Site Characteristics:*f-' Thy ,p�•ojeci: sate is -vacant and
�t
re,atively level. Vegetation consists of indigenous weds and
sh ubs. The project' site abuts the Haven Avenue Overlay
District to the west, and Sante Fe railroad easer6rt to the
north.
J.
Gp licable Regulationsr The use of the property as a-_mini=
warehouse is a permitted use, in the Minimum Impact heavy
Industrial Area (Subarea 9). It is the residential 6se of the:
caretaker 's ;ol- 4, -ters which requires a -C Conditional Use Permit to
be approved 'P'y the Planning Commission,
IL ANALYSIS:
A.
General: The proposed development consists Irf s -story assts
one 2 -story storage buildings. The office aril the caretaker's
unit are located at building A which fronts on Utica' Avenue.
The elevations that are most Visible from public view have been
treated with different material textures such as scored split-
face block, cement plaster and metal siding, with shadow
patterns, to create a variety ,ys building ;plane and surface.
For secura,y purposes, a wrcught iron fence has been provided
behind the two driveway entrance: while a decorative stucco . -- -
wail has been provided to the west property,boundary.
B.
Design P.aytew Committee: the -. �n Review has
I
reviewed the project and fouhe;f that the overall site plan
complies with the Industrial Specific Plan cnd provides for �p
1
transition of _land use intensity from Haven Avenue to Heavy
Industrial. The Committee has recommended__ that the following
improvements be conditioned on the project h:�fch the developer
has agreed to: ;
1. Landscape the IO foot rail elsement locate, d at 'north
`aerty
p boundary.
2. enhance wept elevation of Building 0 through repe; ;ling the
sad: treatment as in the office elevation. ;:
H_
i,
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Conditional UsE Permit 35-05 - Pauley
May <S., 1935
Page 3
3. Enhance westerly block wall by providing :accent treatment
to the top of the wall such as accented '.smooth face block.
C. Environmental Assessment! Part I of the Initial study has been
Completed by the applicant. $taff has completed Part II of the
Environmental Checklist and x''aund no significant impacts on the
environment as a result of this project. 'A copy of Part Il of
the Environmental ,Checklist is attached for your reviert,,and
consideration.
III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with th4? Industrial
Area pecific Plan and General Plan. The projecti,Iwill not be
detrimental to "adjacent properties "rr cause -significant
environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed site :and building
designs, together with the recommended Conditians, are in
compliance with the Industrial Area specific P1 n_, and City
Standards, {
IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advhrtised as a �6blic hearing
in The 0- y Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices
were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the project site.
V. ••R_EC64NDATION, Staff 'recomr� that the Planning Commission
consi er all material tir kt regarding this project. 11' the
'Commission concurs with the findings and- Conditions of Approval,
adoption of the attached resolution and issuance of a NegatWe
1pciaration mould be in order.
Res submitted, -
R ck erne._..
ity an r
RG:NF:n5
Attachments„ Exit4hit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Hap
Exhibit "C" - D1rtailed Site Plan
Exhibit "D" - Ccisceptual Grading Plan
Exhibit "EY -r Co;)ceptual Landscape Plan
Exhibit "F" - Ytrspectsve of Office and Caretaker's Unit
Exhibit - "G" - Elevation
Exhibit "H" - Floor Plans
Initiat?Study, Part.-U--
Resolution of rpproval with Conditions {
Fl
. n
_gac— UT ILIt�rrarr e(�n
C_ V
NORTH
Ury Cr `
„
nz- ;
PL
r-
EXHII3IT4 '`
r.
„4
- LL
s V V
*'°'�° - °r"�°',• -;. awes Q:anr+m
�r6>rM�• a�u-� K 3
�rarir9�+ 1�im� a41 y�. i �I
A
�p as. . aVy Syr.
. g +.wMS ri '�•
YTEM
UCA 4 r< .
x�
EKHI[PT
y,
fs
tom/ j i ..n ,. ^ L _ - 9...rM� iNW F,�.ti T`...w /� ✓'3 '�
S
Cr
f ,
._
P+ �
w
+n e
r t
u
1p
v !
h"'�'s ` -L �• 1 �" / '' �j '? l:! p. Ste. r r ✓ .i.,� d} ,j. t I f €- �. !�.
� r"`",�_SZ.s� -�'_' �.. ���.• Jf• IY R � ��• •.�s. � �. .:.e lj .11.4 T.. �e11 y
. f � ...T...w• \,,,_ 1', «^ �i..n. � y may..•.:.. � ...q -,,;.� i PTiii�,r � tt j'r s.ao� i
f �A ^—.•a �� :w�� -�-- �^��• .—N «4 yr �* •.K r"—�� --_•_ a° � � ..._ — •.- ._,.... �• .. sue, ��.�v ;i�d'� ., j�ar
- %.s...�.e..< .(e ;I i,!`.�}':�G.:i..e7#c•;:: "+gnu (.
�r
CITY OF
't i4i�IN1� I CXHIBI �` � SCA : - -- °
2
l y
op
M
u
1p
v !
h"'�'s ` -L �• 1 �" / '' �j '? l:! p. Ste. r r ✓ .i.,� d} ,j. t I f €- �. !�.
� r"`",�_SZ.s� -�'_' �.. ���.• Jf• IY R � ��• •.�s. � �. .:.e lj .11.4 T.. �e11 y
. f � ...T...w• \,,,_ 1', «^ �i..n. � y may..•.:.. � ...q -,,;.� i PTiii�,r � tt j'r s.ao� i
f �A ^—.•a �� :w�� -�-- �^��• .—N «4 yr �* •.K r"—�� --_•_ a° � � ..._ — •.- ._,.... �• .. sue, ��.�v ;i�d'� ., j�ar
- %.s...�.e..< .(e ;I i,!`.�}':�G.:i..e7#c•;:: "+gnu (.
�r
CITY OF
't i4i�IN1� I CXHIBI �` � SCA : - -- °
2
l y
tw►ww aeen
Isar .-
a
II 3 4
{ �t
p gf =E 1 4
i +
yti
a
• a _ . x etll0re+e4ofi�pY�a�y ti § i'. { .
r- .��...� •TTY '-�
r*`� 4sarsrrsa
WORTH
RANTC
OF
ITEM.
PLf1NUI�,rG DIVLR i rr SCA. E-
` t
9 ,
5�
b
AdI
a -
3
1
AAk
F
F
A
' 1 ruts
:47- IN
�45
ZMELV,
rtPkT FLWR—Pldl�
TH
CITY Ort
nuM.
D,
RANCHO CITCAMONIGA
TI D
IT
PLAMNING DIVISM
EXHIsIT-.-
CITY OF RANCHO CUGA -MO \GA
PART 11 — INITIAL STUDZ
ENVIRO:I!EfiT.AL CHECKLIST
DATE:—
APPLICANT:��f yJt� y ��E fiL'A/Esf�T
FILING DATE:- :, -15'; rj "_ LOGTNVMER:
.4&IW Altcmr
PROTECT; !?5 , 73D
5, i
PROJECT
PROJECT LOCATION. l AAI &R % /Cti ,d U�
�'A �T
Y. E NZRO: yENTAL I:�ACTS
(Explanation of all "yes" and "=a'be't' answers
sheets). are required
\
an attached
t ,
gEs KAYBE NO
I`
1. Soils and Geoloay.Will the' proposal"have
§ignificant results'in:
a Unstable ground conditions or in changes in
geologic relationships?
yi^
b. Disruptions, displacements,'-compaction o�
burial
._� of the soil?
f-
c - Change in topography or g.aand surface '
contour "intervals.
".-
d. The destruction, covera_,g or modificitfon
_'— -••mac - -r.. -.
of any "unigLk'geologi'c `4* Physical &Aturns?
e• Any potential increase im wind or water
%
erosion of soils, aZfeoting either on or off `
site conditons?
{�
f. Changes in erosion siltation, --or deposition?
_
g. Exposure of people -or property to geo`agic'
hazards
such as earthquakes, lardslides,.muu—
slides, ground failure, or'simiiar hazard s?
yf
h. An increase t,n the rate of .extraction andlor
use of-any mineral resource?
2- liYdtolo Will the proposal have significant_'
results in:
Page
2
t
YES ;+r,AYBE N
'
a.
Changes in ,currents, or the course of direction
of flowing streams, rivers, or
_ ,
Chanitols? ephemeral stream
b•
Changns ir= absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and
amount o£ sur
: runoff? face water
✓
r
c.
Alterations to the course or flow of flood
Waters!
r
\\ f
d•
Change in the amou;rt of surface water, in any r
body of s.ater?
�/
�... 1/
R
e.
Discharge into surface waters„ or any
alteration
of surface, water quality?
f.
Alteration of ,groundwater characteristics?
g.
Chan e
g in the quantity of grouadwaters,
eithe, hrough direct additions•,cx.
)
with-
drawals, or through interference l %±th an
aquifer?
Quality?
Quantity?
h.
The The reduction in the amount o " <<Ar.er other-
wise
available for public :sate upplies?
I-
Exposure of-people or property to water
related hazards such as flooding or
seiches?
Y,f'
_
3. AirE pub• Will the propose i
results in: have sig;�ificant
a.
Constant or periodic air ;emissions from mobile
or :indirect sources?
Stationary sources!
b.
Deteriaratioin of ambient air quality and /or
interference with the attainment of applicable
air quality stand�rds?('(
c.
Alteration of ibcai or regional climatic
conditions, af,tecting air movemen 1. moistire
rf
��
or temperature?"",
4.
Flora. Will the gropos`i have signifi cant ✓Yesu is
a,.
Change in the charactl'ristice of spedies,
including
�
diversit stril�ution, o number
of 43y species of pl PSI
a
c
s
Reduction of the `pumbc�;' of any unique, rare
or endangered species of `ulznts?
Page 3
YES uAYHEa
c. _Intaaduction of dew or disruptive species or
plants into, an aria?
T_
d. Reduction in the pote.Itial for agricultural
production?
Fauna. Will the proposal "hava significant xasults
!(
a. Change in the characteristics of �aeebs,
including "diversity, distributiOn -or numbers~
'
of any species of animals?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any anique,,rare
or er- 4angered species of 'animals ?,
f
c. Introduction of nee* or disruptive species of
animals into an area, or result in a barrie,
to the r.I- Z-atyon or movement of animals?
✓
ff11
_
d. Deterioration N
or removal of existinjrfish or
wildlife hahli at?
r/
l
S. Pobulation. Will proposal have significant
_..
results icr
a. Will. t�e propes3l alter the location, distri-
density diversity, or rate
;-growth of
the human populi4-n of an area?
b. Will the proposal affect ex Icing housing, or
create a demand for addition::L mousing?
tl,
�.
b. Soc o- Ecanonie Factors will th `uinposal have
significant Sesults in:
a. Change in local or regional socio, economic ' '}
characteristics, including eco' iom:ic oz
commercial diversity, tax rare; and propett j
values?
f
b. Will project costs be equitably distributed
among
pro °Zct beneficiaries, i.e., buyers,
.
r.
tax payers or project users? ?
,r
7. Land Use and Planning Cansiderations. Will the
propose; have significant %:esults in?
a. A substantial alteration of tbe;preser"t or
planned land
`
use of an� area?
J b.
A ccri£lict with any des:,;nations, objectives,
S
a
b
policies, or adopted plans of an
entities? y governmental'
J)
r c. An impact upon the qul'aify drl-. entity of '
existing consumptive or non -c'i,nsurative
recreational, opportunities?
jr�
_
Page
t.
YES Y3E lilt
8. Transvartatian, Will the proposal h1dvs significant"
results
a. Generation of substania`x additional vehicular
movement? ((/,.
b. Effects orb' existinp, strLts, di` demand for
new street construction? „
✓
C. Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for t�e1 Varking?
.
d. Substantiai "impact
`
upon existin transper:a-
tion systems.
e. A`.terat orl{yto present patterns of circula-
tion or mol� e \ent peapla
Of and /or goods?
V
f. Alterations to or effects on present ana
potential water - horn, rail, mass transit or
air traffic?
�^
�/
g. Increases in- traffic hazards to flator"veh:scles,,
bicyclists
•�
or pedestrians?
9. Cultural Resources. Will therproposal have
SignifY "subs
f
.. r� in:
a. A disturbance to the integrity of"archaeological,
naleontologi a7., and /or historical tesources?
10. Health, Safety, and'Nuisance F ^ctors. Will the
proposal have significant results in
a. Creation of any health hazard or potential .health
hazard?
b. Exposure'cf people to potentl health hazards?
/
C. A risk of explosion or, release of hazardous
substances in the eve7k" tt£ an accident 11
Z An it -cease. in the nuobe� of individuals
o
or species of vector or patenogenic
organisms or the exposure of people to such
organisms?
1 ✓/
e.. increase in existing notse;,levelso
f
f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous
noise
leveis4
,r
8• The creation of objectionable odors,
z
�. h. An increase in liaht or glare? .
Page
5
\
YES
NO
17',; AestbFties. Will the prop
results in: osal have LXgni£icant
a. The Obstruction or „degradation of any r,cenic
vis,:a or viev ?
b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive
site?
c. A conflictLwith -Rhp_ objeetite of desigq ted
or potentiei scenic corrie -rs? t
. 12. rttil�it3es andPublic Services, Wi1g rhe.proposai
have a
significant need for new systems; or
alterations to the follc•4,ing;
it
a. Electric power?
rb. Natural or packaged gas?
c. Communications systems?
d. Water supply?
�
e' Wastewater facilities?
~
J'
f. Flood control. structures ?,.
V
g. Solid waste facilities?
1'i Fire protection',
I. Police protection?
j, Schools?
k. Parks oT atl'er recreational facilities?
1. Maintenance of public' - Facilities, including
roads and flood,control facilities?
si. Other governmental Serrates?
13. Energy and Scarce EesouTCes. Will the proposal
have significant results
ins
a.. Use of substantial or excessive ,Fuel or energy?
-
V
'
b, Substantial increase in demand upon existing
sources of energy?
c. !tn' inorease in the demand for de`..`elopment of
aew so,irces of energy?
d. An increase or perpetuation of the coiisumpt 40n
of nonrenewable forms
of energy, *when feasible `
renevabie sources
';
\ of_ener gy 2z\ ± available.
Y
„
Page 6
W if
YES"iBE
�I
e- Substantial depletion of ai;} ankenerratr2e or
s2arce natural resource?
14. Mandatory Findinrsts -sf Significance,' %'
a. `)oes the project have the
the quality Potential degrade
9 ty of the
environment, substantiall;�,
'"'Ice the`h�bitat of fish or wildlife
speies,
cause, a fish or wlllrlife population to drop; ✓ /'
,�elow saf sustaining,
,lever - threaten• ta
-eliminate a plantcor animal C9Rmunifiy, ridUCe'
�
the number or restrict tIi ; range of a rare c^
:�dani id-wp1jan q alt ai csr eliminate
\; �....
h. '
k = imps' tirahr exampc of the m sr periods o
x
f Ca3ifornia history or prehis3oi7ij
/ :>
b. D.es'the project have the potential. to achieve 'TM
VI.
to the disadvantage of fang -term,
environyental goals? (A short -term ftpacr on the
o environment 3s one which occurs iiq^a relatively
brief,. oefinitive
perioet�,,of time while ling-
term impaktts will end;;:e
V
well into the frture).
c. Doi. fhe projacc h, impacta which are
k individually lii3te, j* but
cumulatively
considerable? ( Cumulatively considerable
means that. the
veremental efi`.�., c`ts of an
Individual pr ojQt arer.tonsider4le
when viewed <-,
lu connection with the effects of past-',pyQjects,
'
and probable .f::ture projeces).
=\
d. Doei'�the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial sdvexse effects
on
wzaaari beingg, ', ther directly or 5ndiractly?
II. r"ISCUSSION OF MURb2DL"iTTil L>VALVAfi1oN (i.e.. of tiffirarztive
the
answers
aYbve, questions itcs_a discussion of to
to
p proposed Mitiaxtion measures),
1
0`1
1
A Ali
`
page 7
yy
On,
the basis of this initial evaluation:
»
}(J
T find 'the r
p aYOeu' ro`ectCOCL N6Th
an have a si,gnifica4t effect `
d Xz;.,*TIvE MCl. ATIO . cr{il be prepared,
f
I find t#� ` altbo- proposed Pi ter^ E =could have a ai
,: 8h 'he. �' gnificant
eff at on f--Nt onaent, thezb to l-not
t
be a significant eff'tet
in this cas jiE se the;aitigatio measures
described on ae
attaehi'd shaet have, t $cent added #t4 the 'prgjEdC,` .� PiEG?:mr. 1-1 rEGLAR�1,Ti0Y WiI,T.' SE p�EiTAItED
(--�
L__I
I find tae prcpased gxo ect �C have a significant wfe6ct on the '
enviraa ,�nL � and an ;E, py gYT 11PACT , REPORT is required.
Date
Signature
Title
• 1
I .
(\r
f
ivrt% ry — a
, Ak
t
•
f
.y
t ^. Jf�iwi�.a'�� r_•''.....
� c I
,3l... s<ti_. 4_,�, _,:.. r „t.. � ._, 1, .. ..
� - -� ��fl8� -� P Agenda � off'
0701 -02 ^ o 0 -
RESOLUTION NO.
— A- RESOLUTION- O T�'c RANCHO CUC1< ^,P.�, k PLANNING, COMMISSION .. _.-
'
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERP, NO. 85 -05 FOR 125,730
SQUARE FOOT 'MINI - WAREHOUSE FACILITIES WITH,OFFICE AND
CARETAKER'S QUARTERS LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
u UTICA AVENUE &�-M STREET IN THE MINIMUM IMPACT HEAVY
INDUSTRIAL OISTRYCT (SUBAREA 9)
WHEREAS �n the 29th day of March,. 19$5, a_cnmTletG app�ricacio was
filed by «u ley na�zfiAmA �vv 1i�,((tly SZr' -rev Jew Of the aboYe -de scribed project;
and
WHEREAS, cry the 8th (fay of May, 1985, the rancho Cd amonga Planning,,;
Co -waiss.iorr held a public hearing to consider the tbove »described project.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning ,'ommission resolved as f
follows:
(,
SECTION 2: Tht the following findings can be met:
?. That the proposed use is in accord with -the General
Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and
the purposes of the district in which the site is
-`
located'.
`
2. That the proposed use, together with the. coaditionS
i
applicable theretar will ho} be detrimental to the"
public health, sa i,,�, t-r welfare, or materially
injurious to: pros °,'2 2� t Improvements in the
i
vicinity.
3. That the proposed —, 4te coe lies with each of the
,.., applicable provisions of the Development Code.
SECTION 2. That this project will not create adverse impacts cn(the
environment and that a Negative Declaration i issued on May'S, 1985. - -• -�_
SECTION 3, That Conditional Use Permit No. 85 - &S is approved
subject to the following_conditiors;
.PLANNING DIVISION f
1. Landscaping shall be provided in the 10 foot rail easement
located at.,the north property boundary including mihimum
15 gallon size trees planted 30 feet on center, shrubs and
ground cover. A 'letter or ati document from Sante Fe
Railroad Company authorizing such landscaping shall be
submitted to the Plaiping Division prior to issuance of.
building, permit.
Resplutian Na.
,CUP85 -05 .:: nauley
C`; y 8, 1985 ,
Page 2
' 2. Prg�vide - accent treatment to the top of the westerly wall
s! :'h as smo#h face-,block.
3. 866eid� landscaping shall bo V- �gvidled anainst east side of
Buildings "`A ", "B ", and "C'`�i a�- entire frontage of
Utica.
4. Pr videthe same treatment as in the office elevation to
}
th wesv,•elevation of. Building "D ".
x
�l
ENGINEERING DIVISION:
1. Notice of intention 'to join the proposed median island
landscape maintenance district shall be filed with the
City Council prior -to the issuance of building permits.'
t°
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8th DAY OF"MAY, 1985.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY _OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Dennis L Stout, Chairman
ATTEST: 1,
Rink Gomez, Deputy gecretary
I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Sefretaq of the Planning Commission W tye City of
Rancho Cucamonga, .-'o hereb -',r certvfy that the foregoing Resolution wa dula. and.
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Cammiss'ibn of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the PlanningComnission held
on the 8th day of May, 1985, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ti �I ✓ G 0
°y.Ya �• T- •fir=
v 4y
Nv i..:
oA
r.--a 'aa, 'ry
A^
Nvr..
y
4n.uu
Na
o...Na Lu ^ws
EI.�Y.
n .°.°
d4Nn
L >¢..Y
O1`
��p
ion
-u-a
Oj.Q ytAtrhVN
bd�0
cyb'o
w 0.TG 6U
C {�
of
4 `od -..tip_
'
6 ^C Ca.Aq.U. fG Cw
...0
AeVy
"`dn N AJ
Syr4
U4yc4 ..
AY�yUU
... Y 44 O °y
bVW Qyt
O
iC LU €�
Luw.�
G Y
pdV.V N
9
ZY'nu4a
m u
tow. -w
°ice ten°. °'oz
"'�.°
ti
d OA
OY 9
2 CtT.t'GO
y y 0
46.
4 ayY. ° n
L
�..d
c'.. va
^.
V.Niy SV NL°aa� uc
.Y+•
zeal
NBO.'N
N4gd
..24!
b v. ir.0 ��a
Gcdy 4y „M�44
O�YS
U��ON�c
� »L OrN
V�iA=
�^n�
rV.�4 w' � t
c Cr
a-gS— .- ad
i N
aa.r a
eeYY
a
O�V dGrpuC
OA
L i3U
C�AY
4d0
flCr
N. pi OCDU
A ^Ga P4gNL
G 4d
UAC.
L q 2 nor C�dS
-z a-
V
rrtti
`YZ
1u...
° u.0 •_
p�Y a440SNLR it
O
1t DQ�N
C d CC
cyM r1 N^N'd 3
pp
ZC9m
,,CC
9-1 O.Ld
b
I{
G
c
� \ N l7 O•
�
it
Z
T V
G
�
24-1 r 2t L L.
aWi�i =M
J
C
L E L 6
G
YVU
H
we
N
N
Pa �
aA ..4
e w°
m
yzrL
^
o
anv
Ei
O
4 O vµ..
�a
aac°
O
d
o y
« L
Pr
A
°.o ✓.r.. a:
V
n.
N z
r"
�
vA2 ^w4eiQ �d
A1rRO ^ti-N
'a
M
pb
4 L
6O Lam. .1 L «^ TQ
_ _ m L m° N9E L
.. Eu -X �y agte u. ooaL v w C >,.n.,o2 yv
j..zOzQ nYY..m ?p GC 06> p2 ,C .W., S
nLp ah
a A ' µfm d-mC U,TY
Z nat.0 ONH ed" e°M,CY° -CA° iw n CGOTi�a jdm. _ L wS3C y.T ,
g
U h YC TV dN b WGN.gr% q ~Y Vk„ %Ot a=+ bp4 En
CU
CN dNVO w q r ro b y m C y c OE mAw`ip Y OdO L C ~ C ^ _ n C qg � Ca -� o-
UY C G 1�Y
. -
gmLIZ '¢.A O.Id mOA bN«YIUN FLU °e �cOn yv.°• N. KLOw qq
p� µ bcN L YyV�rR� hcq S4LR 6 V
g 3 J C b d o GOO m N L C N C u m q W R O
C�n� ^yA ^y ro d� dm�LN =G: rn.^m�w�.^'� qM °� aEY, ,^o0+69 •.6i
0 F y., n m q
T�N iq MbO. NOyNN °OT =G. 0,00,x,.. Y.'L.W. m� bE ON
�e'u� O Y "m0 �YYK b � GA ws G y?
--.z °W� _.UY dawa 6'V 6y w0 by VN G0 Ldc�n GQ -
V G V m u 67 L � y m C �� G. ^ ECE £
^ m Y L C c
- QE.S O^.G A4a�ir V"=YT, �•-LxO cOcL
„M, YS =N dtJ am.. i6+r.wN W.w d
r'
i
it
It
aF v`=+nwbY.
7,; rwq�
-0 d GV .:z Lk L.L c m0 G^
y: N� S 4L p b Nt O.Y. V � ^�
°off LL icy. :JAN G'N G a�Ed yCg1 c 3.G a b��
p 4 ti
�y Ve6
E.wj° q my
S°
L GE
Y yq Zpb° O
° G
N N
G Od mL Obo °O Lit
N G m y R w c o d t E W x 6 u o¢ i v i° ° '^.
Oe} 4s COQN LQ Oe1'.� �
",4
qN Tom. O. of � OW Rd OI.N �V K
O Y w� O v
pub 10 u C Y 9 C c V CjYG + C'G mWyy d
d
atC�N LC OewN .� >mC L6...�Rq=bab d�' R .c.awi yeb YpC
LY NLy 'e'�U 3a o� Y N.c O NICE S mK w
A 4 VC Fit
bO,+ yL EB dU gnGq `OyC M.E bcy^m ie
Ny u Nom- m C
'O� E Noe ��tia EyL'b 4T.^ C t a+L N Yew � t try
- d b F. cm YNN.. bibM CGO °4 b'n'e VO�� ^a c a.0 GQ. pOe,,,OO
tec.
y "ELE'c L 6� V C Eb N Of d o Jb L L eT u C A C Oe T O C°J j N p N L O'CI
b6OdL ieA grtf> GamLi� LVb m [R.1L MdLy 40fC. �X 644.V �n °O6!'
Iq -na6 F�.NlO 6^ NON <4 ,°I `a4 6t LCE tmC Ww ° 6ML
nalq�+01..... l+WX »cra 1+.. qt da
14
4a
. G
Two mr c
cmb >m m
m q a a T
Tb m v t
t Lea
C O L D m C
�4m... w
wy LE 1 .h .
..
.
- g CAO
rnO �.
��..
rnV ��Gi VCNVLA�
GLOIr •.
.Iw
A im
sx r.
ai 1^.e o.:°_w Yr arc
E'i9Y
vm Zj"� •.EF •Td�.o°.�
LN 4p
dN �
)
Gd
G� Y .bra q iC
.C•.�o =� ro R:.i y _
a_
w
q
- C dV.io
E RcryC
V
y „ro
c 'row
W
N
�
t
w
V O
t
A L V N Y p
� D ro
yL�q ,r
6 A 'Lb A ro C •�..
sNG �
G
'
• V P 7 N
N I A V
ip � G
E i.� A
g Y.
q V N.
O.
qm
S L T
� Ad T b ^ Y O U N.�. NL N�
NN�m �
b l «- A . mo w `
O N� Z H. . T .^ yYY• y d
.{J..
E N
a i
b r•' �+
U r ° C o N Y y d
d w s C ° i N H
LO
t
.O
Qrq LL
dLIIC
60
n O
4i rnCY YA. q'C G
NC °4+� c� y ^yc "
CL
•N,1GA �'OLL,)c
�4
tt UD..
AN
T�L Q6ZVYrd Sd
NN
Cy?G« ¢j LL:�y
+OiCY O t
�L�C
Nwc �LNCC
9w L.a 6��NZ d'iy.
y ORC6 ai LdNC'
'
O
R3A i�
Sf . w.
YO
Lb
d O•�q••1L C.OiadCm
ee+
LV °�G 001`.
T°
�?V�
luO� 4..{V.
LnN
ATE <m<
q.G YNtYYy w Ay)
,r�•CO •r w.. Y
roGY CWA • k:
=O
+NYL
EY�j
RV�Y
��Or
nH
O)
9t
1•Sa
y�
OVgdY
cw Y. Yaw LbVN44c
AAY �NL"4 ICro NQYO
6 G4 y
LLL N# yqN "
� du IL� Cw
C �C qV- UNLY
) W
�PF
yyC y�L VIGa
O Y RC
�aYY
°emu � oN.
Z.
/� A.L•o OY t� a
a,
wT all:
vAdoo
' i9
� EC
Yq-
aL6
n
Y Yo•1O o X:5 t c
A C NU VO 6 . VAC O �?larw
urAi qW
G i �^
G t
NY4 N iii y�i
mL
6 N TGL �
c
LN L
N°^v
Y[A
EN �U
4N 6N
sww
SNO
rn L.E .c Lcq v a f{
Y wfC L �� L r. 4� OtlCri
HNi dNY rnT 01ANp0 GA 06 6Y WOgON
r
1; t
Yq
O
bro
« VR
c
be t •: VV LI-
L N � O�
6 AL
C .Oc6 •� >t N
� A q�.A Cg61 -
T �N£
U
Ni
Q6
^La
N L N GYQ
EE5 1
q CT U O4N_q
O
CdG
N= N
Oy w~ L
`
C6 L
E
w
6
aN4c
Yb
.c
Y� i
q� •� bb ZQ.,�>
y0 pCM tL LLB
A qi r01 S ..
-C40
vA-
O
o5
S
AV w rn •'b
d Y vA9
L Y
a� ^ OG N.0 Ew S
6
�Y°
ndm
.O
1TiL
4y U �
A
yC
UY b d ��Y
V E.. c =c
°iyY 'IrY
AD GAE T i %�o'L
goLC YYY aV
ATro
R
O
IS G
Ly L L
�L
4a aN
O b
dU ACy
NAY
9
At.,� NN
.dCO
N
•}LL•�
A N N =
�
N
� 2 C L L�
w cb°�" 9 •.
r� E C 6 d 0 •
E
Tiov wroVA E.o
•n 6C C?,
L
o
Y c
Y� S
aroau.�A+YN- G°!�`-CM1
V
ro
iOA�
H OC
6 ^aO
WCdL�
NL >6A
do n NPN R r
d u.0
A` G C:
Q1DU
A N c•On tJ
�°
a Yom..
Lw•H L1^
dq^
X'
Ytro
N.° c9 w.q yRO
dNww we ^Cr<ad
3c • Yy.... rn Gv`�
p.dCw
•mot �L.
T.
�1i0
4 �Nbd
6� �UWdix
r+ �t tWOCL
NVy :q LQ yg NIi L'OL
><-2 A°O N L6 Vb� L
dwNO
dAY.ID S'
Q°N.�1d
4N d1.) db. I -�ONYq
G ° p
q C
,C Rbq
d N4 Ra -W66•V VIy Mt
n
u.-od Fc
�qa
a a c�uai
ue+
iwa
E�y "�q •
a
D1q v'�
••-
G
d.''d>
A
G
>
O•dd Oq O
Rabf,
L ♦NC qY
a
u
>.
wL+YU
C7
A In
�•a�
u
Lt q q C y y
yr
>
O%.
•
Y
c> rnnEcva
0 �0 0 x q C.� q �U .�
/ ti• K
Ga•`Y GwOi q
u.
�w
0
d
N .r-
2;R
C O. b C .-. ti k N L
C
u'G ^a.E G •!�N S
V�aY+
01 ��4 ^gNdC
T
'° n�i
GaT H °•. -LVr Gq°. a
� .�_w'Gi
Yv aL °"n
°'
..c°t.o
J }.
.`FUN Fta..O. -O CI_•C W
uC0'S
C ++_yE aC4
^
y� y.a.
rA.zj�
tdrt��OW
Nc� G,y 3G+.ti � u wN �
L 4 q y>S S
Jby
Ov.'np° Er.a rEs
ie
F�
Np
Q•
M.�L �Oru °^i ME^i u
'U R Ua
F
Oo
U "E'p Rtd"3y
9ZC
N.
Yy
�JV/ �LK m
U
HE'EV EE d
°dG"•4
�vUl .
61
Lai Eu GO O,^ �
�
RGV4
�U�
Ri>7
O Y �>•d
C)N
N
q i0.
L'�a„d'lL alT
N Yff
M
°
d.0.
\ l�AaLL
.�TO
-1�G 0.w+ �S.ti�h !r-Am N((�•O�
rUWl
11�L.O. L. �N A�nW°
L
N'N
OVO•
C. VF
Y.
i C
A
\ "
b
N
qw
I
C�
dY^
C d
Vb V' aCC
t n0
0
V4LL
4a.�: Oµb t
3b�Q.
wM '•+° C
VQ'
.�
.�
�
°u.i L
'yi
Cl m
^
.dv '•
•"m�'
aa^Ai
yo
w'+"Q„a
ao Bbd >°
':.n L.,.
. -ru°y,
,,,L w
�„° c
uQ.
►+'
d
wY'n �!- .._.e.
gY.CT
�.�-
d.C= �mw'Ga �
�C =°
rd a.C� -
i•L'
�LL
oa
yw° p
C` Or �A6 M
>�_. Cu. d >at+VY
na N q
CdGa
G q d01
aLY
+^ C.
Eih
�O U•un
dW L.C-
F
�
V
LCM
L�q
wey ` LC NZ^y a
yL4u.
TE b6^ N
EIE
�. N
F
y
7R
l Qt ddY YiOd r
n.Qi
M¢L OC
4L0.« m� d°
d pL
w.k
E
qi it h
,°,: n mo.9 6
:<O• or
° ay cv
dCg
u C
d c NL o R
.e,°.;^_
�G A�°
RE aC �.ICO w-uFm �
qN�a
CDW E�'d� a
+• d
Md.L
o a.�Q
a�yy`
V N dZa RO�q bl.
c
q
.n Y�.d NQ
CN CG ^� G
Lbw
N;rV
mad d�
„..°+ 6o GN 1e
RAO
r
t�1wU0Q
da Cd
A
a GG6 3d.
}L. -..0
N OO Uq
Oi �CCCdu
~Ga Ate^.
d.0
Zia
LGU
y0•dL�
C L Y
OAS'. �Ey
Qlr RC..�C
RN
GRm. GYN++ V
LO
WLL
EF
6d1"v y•
S O L
a 00 C•@.IN
NYfl d
a
An
y�A
as a•n qv
°� e
1
dN E
tN 0 FW
dA y 1•
t
�
a
G•l'1 N'O
_
C
E C G
� C
NO
lw 'E 4G� •
q4
.�L
i � O
�Lq w
v
G N
L y
•0
�
Tugs
a u
Ld%
A
LN
daC
4
Z
d
O T
.
v.. V Y C W
_.. CCY Oi C
•Rm
a
ML
a t i0•
d w 4
44
cli
4nE
= _..
dAY
a
=OV
ti
i
@ANO
GryC
K.
•p.�
L
d a
Ob
..•
OG
C
O
•O
O .�
t c
Ar
•� m�z.�J Y
OA pb LG
4y d,t- s• k
E 6 y d d
L
W n
Y
qL
Eva Z.
GTE..}
e..'.Y..
ms4
dN. pig: 4 _
dL• @ A j 4
_ ff +••' q O O O
4
Y.�a' .Q
�
E' -z
J6� -T
d ;q
�NLd
K�bl
A.`c Cyty �� •
-.o
r� 1u
•pG L
q
Fg' »� ^.N
�.{
ca m� aaa cc
° v N
di ^
r
e6.
AN
oq,
�CC0
4�
AY
' Au�L NL
ORd
p
U��d
CCU
m' c
u '•[ O' 4 Y O M, P
•' u 3 N u o
o c..$a
�
a
d 5
p
a*, 040 �
L N 3 9 � A
M 4 E G z
I
LO
'
as
LOY c vav
m
L N
a m O C10
Y d o d• d
'L O Y�
1/1
G
N
CiYQ
6 G p.
-
C�
L�.
a. a uAq
Tr: L�
p
qL Rq
ar
Tom.
� h.,...
� -,.�_
.yam
•"�'
a � Gc,,
��Y•ri
w
- •.
SLG
d0..
0
A G�
+may
�a dcA
O��T
.
1i0.
• a. N
t"• q CA
^ C^ u a o
q �
� i 4 a q � A y¢�
C`M
O
�
LY
M y� p II
y�
LD � "qYU
.eC l�Hr�
NO R
Q3 M Yy O•
�aWd0 .rO.
G A V � 1 a n
dUNC
.OWN U.0
Napa
C X41.
dq NWM
Gnu yms
Yv.
M
r
o
-A.r Nx�3.
sz
uA
_
vc
Er
Yo. �a A'
an
V° d�R�
f'o, n"' v N �"
q� dt aw M
u?
:. v. $�
RUy0 to
:° a y..
cco°.y^
d
CaT p'L
y� tiN Fr
an � �~ mama �
� � Mn
w
LL
•�• Am
EHY
NY.
M P
nY dd
y yA @. J N N
1 •+ q.6
O O.d,
6r a.
Y O d
cc?Oaa •n
Y D• 6
- aGpA
4-4
A O
a,4EO
O,yEpE a•a#µµ.
L
yf"1
La NL P
AG }O.
Yn
aO�G�L
.��
Of
ad+
q 01
JAN
..-b • AN OI €Y
C
XY �. Gn Cy a
V..
iggea
nnvvin-
6dSYS
�ONT�Q
°ovn a a.�.ond
aM. o.ax -`
in-
!'q AO
a
b
.ro�`d
WNa
ayi m
YlaV �R PL3Rf
4w QO G01Y. 1=-O 6.b
V
d.
t _
PiiU •
ME~.UG
� _
N
y
.
h
4-44
'C
4 qp
N
r
4
�G
O/a .y
6CO
C� C
CCI�gU4U ^y
C
VA�
i
V� Lam^
wGl�li.^r.
L V Y
4�E
GuV irey
is a` L� UUO VUp
�. �' N
qa
Cfw
Np
b
f GG
UNd LG
aa+Uh Gw
pua
�DVy V c i���
R
+bp
U
w..-`a
C�UnU
NE O
O•:CLw aY
Y ^T.
no u oo.
w
VRO..RO/.&
q a
ba `•f
aMa{y
y.
n
l{
M
L Wd•
M
�� �
4• %.
C
O
A
M
4G
4 N
t9
Su
M
p.y
3c Z
•
u
v
Ji
V
4V-
~pTN
CZ
Vy
_iC�i
&
el
Fes+
°c c
of
nz:
v
c
Y Ty
it
Cb Y GAY
NV qO �N
C>Sgy
G]4w
qD 4N �Y
40- M ^'2
xO
Off'• i
4a�.
w E
O
4� yCVEE N�
�.O 1tHL N
� 4
G L �V
Ezy
Ep V
�0H
i
4 G
AGO,..
q+.0
w 4•c
6A 'Wi
30 u444w
NC
EP CS
n �
O �M1y
�
11
6VL
R4
<L V�
W
V 4
V
n Lz.-
11
mf P
Nf
N '��
Nf �
W
�•
U �
a
\ •.
�
]
f..
N$
�
u
y �'
to {1 t
G U
Z
o•_
'N
K
q
N
P
-
-
=
t• n
'nEE
��
✓
rt�L ill.
•g
- �
^oa?%
i o ueaao
E\``
m
`ya° 1.
ni
d.^
a] Y d^
O y
y •�
�
_•a
�j
C a
''+d P [ w
NC s
G A
a.L.
O w.c
i
��. L
6�` d C�
y d
• d
Gr T
Y +A+
1��
ONO
Tifi
AU
�.0
NN tic LV L�
_ +' _NwA�
y0 +
F Q
SO A'O
E
..£.d
-Ol=G
N•r• -piT
.SUN
9
i
Gy
t
:
� c..G. �}., .�
e
dui
ta�9
NO
6U
� �•d
o yy'.
+
o=
G.^-
� NR =d
Y•'', p,W
rnv
T
TL
d
d
RY
O A
� �
dNT �
w=.VM.
Tr•
<� 03 �.� O..•Y
p �
S
O'
G 4 (d
YY
��
G...1 tlA
O d 0
p L
~O
y yi
N
O
O
Y
r L.
O
N
L
6Y
9'
•. D..
• bL ay q0
�-
iapT
L
cN N pQ NL
Gay
N
A O
TI
�s $
A
8t L
A 6
L
L
u pV Eo
d
Wf V
aLiq
A.` +Z
uZA �O
d
yVA
Vp
�L OS
•�N
O�� G Oy p
O
O
rY
bi Y1
-
.0
V
y..cp.
.+4.. ..•
p p.q t
O� O.A � Q
Gd ai.
ed�
YTS
It
FW
1A1Y.
LL
AC
U9 �
dp6 E VYY.. N` ^.
'Oa
7a
V _
Y FKa1
T• 9
t• 4•J+ 6 R N 4 N .Y1 =.Q O
N « �
•C
w
• N
{7 j! N b
n
�
jry
O
= CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA c�Mo
_
�-
ST"F REPORT `
Z
U
_
.2977
DATE:
May 8, 1985
TO:
Members of the Planning Commission*
FROM:
- Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY:
Howard L. fields, Assistant Planner
SlBJECT:
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.
a5 -07 - FISHER - Construction of an auto - repair building
with office totaling 3,167 square feet on .25 acres of
`
land in the General Commercial District, located on the
north side of Base Line, on the west side of Roberds
Street- APN 202- 092 -009.
I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A.
Action Requested: Approval of a, pr site plan
„ „ecise ,and
architectural design, and issuance of a Negativ &,Declaratiu,�'
B.
Purpose: Development of a auto - repaid building wifa office
totaling 31$7 square feet
C.
Location: North of Base Line and the west side of RoUerds
Street
D.
Parcal Size: .25 A.C.
E.
Existing Zonin - 'General Commercial (GC)
F.
Existing Land Use: General Commercial\„ 2 vacant buildings
G.
Surroundin Land Use and Zonin .;, ^
North - Existing Cormnercia facility, (GC)
Soutk, - Existing strip comr,;arcial, (GC)
East - Ex=isting convenience store, (GC)'
West - Vacant, Railroad R.Q.W.
L,
H.
General Plan Designations
Project Site -7 7ommercial
North - Commercial -
South - Commercial-, <;•
East - Commercial
West Office
Y
t ,
4
ITEM I ,.
Planning Commission•
May 8, 1985. ;
_CUP 85.07 �
'.age 2
I. Site Characteristics: The site is presently developer! with two
existing buildings occupying the subject site. The developer
will demolish Loth buildings and completely clear the .site.
Proposed gradinil activities will be minimal.
II. ANALYSIS:
A. General:,,-The applicant is proposing to place a two -story au,o
repair b,gilding on the subject site, which will replace two
existing 'structures in deteriorating condition. ' The upper
story of the project proposal will accommodate officr use and
the lower story will house the auto- repair services. To
resolve potential site development problems, from a Arregular
shaped lot, the appl ;cant is proposing a zern-lot line
technique, abutting project proposal against an existing one-
story building on the southwesterly property line. The
applicant has requested .a Variance 85 -02 for the zero lot line
i0 deyard setback,,;in order to properly orient the proposed
building and still provide the required parking area.
S 17%sign Review Committee: The Design Review Committee
Irecommen a approva a r the design elevations and the
Conceptual landscaping plan subject to minor revisions such as
,relocating the monument sign and designating the parking stall
closest to the driveway approach as a compact car space: The
Committee was concerned about street parir �l alung Robprds
:Street.
\I
C. 'Technical Review Committee: The Technical Rev =Qw Committee has
rev owed the project and has` recommended its approval subject
to fire protection measures incorporated into building design
and sufficient water capacity and access for fire fighting
equipment and vehicles..
D. Environmental Assessmeat• Part I of the Initial_Study hit been
completed 'icy t e�apFT" cant. Staff has completed Part II of th
'Environmental Checklist and found no significant adverse impac�'
:Dn the environment as a result of this project. If the
Commission concurs with said findings, issuance of a Negative
Declaration would be in order.
III FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the General
Plan and Development Code. The project wi7i not be detrimental to
adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environmental .
impacts. in addition, the proposed use and "site plan, together
with the recommended conditions of 60provajzz are in compliance with
the applicable provisions of the Development Code and City
standards.
'f
:Planning Commission`
May 8, 1$85 II 1
CUP 85 -07
Page 3
IV. C0RRESP0H9ENCE�, This item has been advertised in The Dail Report
as a public fearing. In addition, the property was posted and
notices advert sing the public hepring were sent to all property
owners withinl� 300 feet of the 1project site. To date, no
f" correspondence�f�fhas been received r4garding the project.
V. RECOMMEtdaATFONII. It is recommended that the Planning Commission
consider a l 'r put and elements of this project. If after such
consideration he Commission can support the facts for finding,
then' the adop'!on of the attached Resolution arm-�,"issuance of a
H gative-Decla Lion, would be appropriate.
Resp ul ,S bmtit ed,
J
Rij Go 2
Ci y PI n
it
it :HF:ns
achments: Exhlibit "A" - Location--
Exit bit "B" - Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Site Utilization
E01bit "D" - Elevations
Exhibit "E" _ Landscaping
Ex6bit "F" , Floor Plan
Ex0ibit "G" - Grading Plan
v Initial Study, Parr hI
Resolution of Approval
i
a 4 {6
t r f
it ew _ Yt
ZJ /--
1 `
e I
y , .F ♦ 111!11 F r+ l r` �. i i
t f c •a / i F �.
r c �
IV V
w
J
-
�.
All
Ar171MANS
ry x -� ., + ea Raae•..•.;z.w -smc VIKi Kglnstst R. 14104 miTts�w: IJ
2A -not4 MAP OuEtKMs+c .uasn }
f
El
tj
a,tl
Irf
�REI
aril
tILJ
{
o.
�7O Maeo 1 ELEV.d -::�i pttmr s xsot�v
i
1
lip
�f
�7O Maeo 1 ELEV.d -::�i pttmr s xsot�v
i
1
�m
Sot
f;f E.
gz
€s p
RANS ,
AU7�T,
I F` ii7t E FERf lN. dOHK .
.�EU.rnxttq�.tu,srazJ /.fSNOSC+�'FYdN rt>�anH�aoeap
dart ltS�:tp. rywJ ]A1!..7 �w.._51- nh..en n
tee.
Q
a
r,.
ot
m �_»— J
e - 1 -
Lr
r,
-� - - - --
f
14j ^may' } F
* t
'�LGf��t,,�
t�yt , r �'� t ?r,~ �, r: r s *'�' ., r c�-,<a 4 •--q. _
h�Sk
i•
CITY OP R &4C'i0 CuCA,MOkA
PART l - zxr.TIAz. $TURF
ENVIRO''H -N CHECKLIST
DATE
APPLICi,N'*.Ao4` yr /SeSR`
PILING DATE: I pG NUiSB£:
PRO:IECT: GC. /? �p g'. {� �O✓fiS77►ac. ei ,c' rzrr"a`� :,
PribSECT LOCATION; A /,. s� i r✓t F - �s1
,+ d �i' .ed
G I. `�:st'IRO:�':IENTAT. Ik2PACTS ' °�
' (Etfianation of all °'yes" and "maybe„ answers are required on attached
�t
{
YES L418E
I. Soils and Geoloev, ;7x21 the proposal have
NO
signizicaac results in: .� J .
c,
a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in
geologic relationships?,
b. Disruptions, diaplaz%ents, ccmpaczion or
burial of the soil?
rr
c. ,Change in topography or ground Surface
contour intervals?
~
• il\
d. The destruction, covering or madifiaation
Of any unique
geologic or physical features? *r
_ e. Any potential increase in wind at water
erosion of soils;
affecting either on or_.pfi
Site tonditons?
f. Changes in 'erosion siltation, or deposition?
g. Exposure of people or.propertp to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides,
: ta?
slides, ground failure, arsimilar hazard$?
�r
y'
h. An increase in tare rate Of extraction and /or
use of any mineral resource?
ry
• 2sara%oAcy, Wixi the proposal have sig;eifican t
xpsults
in
r
r
Page
h
YES i�YBE b0
__
`
` ,Changes %in currents, a
, r the course of directions,
F off lowing streams, rivet's
or ephemeral pemeral stream
channels?
b• Changes in absorption rat,p dra
or the !"age patterns,
'race and a+^.uFt
of s{-riace water
runoff? �
Alterations to the course or flow of flood
Ovate =s'�'" --• -
` =
^amount
d, - Change ^in the of surface "water in,
env
'., e. Discharge into surface waters, or zn_v
`a2terat "ion
-
-of` surf-ace iaater quality?
f. Alteration -of grbundwatef`characteristics?
�r
g:' "Ctiange'3ii the quantity of groundwaters,
either through directadditions.,or
with-
drawals, or through inter:�irence with
aquifer? an
Quality?
Quantity?
h� -The -reautt%on in 'he iL�unt of crater other-
wise available fcr'public
water supplies?
i. Exposure of people or property to water
related hazer
--s such -as flooding or seichEs?
3. Air ouality; "Mill the
---�� proposal have significant
results in:
a. constant or periodic air emssions from mobile
or indirect
;
sources ?.
Stationary sources?
---_
_
b. 'Deterioration of ambient air quality and /orb
interference
with the attainment of applicable
pir quality standards?
c. f,Alteration of local or regional climatic
'conditions,. affecting
air movement, moisture
or temperature?
14. Biota
—. -. _
Flora. Will the proposal have significant results
in.
a. Change in the "characteristics of species,
including..
diversity,, distrlbution,'or number
of
any species of plants?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, ,ar.�
or endangered species of plants? _
/
Page 3
YES
c. Introduction
of new or disruptive species or
Plants into an area?
d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural
�-
production?
/
�J
Fauna._ Will the proposal'have si" i scam results
a. Change in the characteristics of species,
Including diversity, distribution, or numbers
of any species of animals ?':
b. Reduct On of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of animals?
/
Y
c,- -�Yntroductinn of ne'r`or disruptive species of
- =`
iimals into an area, or result in a barrier
to the migration or movement of animals?
i
d. Deterioration or removal of existin g fish or
wildlife habitat?
5,
--
Population. Will the proposal have significant il
results in.
a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri-
bution,
density, diversity, or growth rate of
the human population of an area?
b. Will the proposal, affect existing housing, or
create a demand for additional housing?
/
V
6.
Sxocio- Economic Factors. Will the proposal have
significant results inc
a. Change in local or regional, socio- economic
characteristics, including economic
--
or
commercial diversity, tax rate, and property
values?
b. Will project costs be equitably distributed
among project beneficiaries, i.e.,, buyers,
tax payers or project users?
N/
7.
Land Use and Planning Considerations. Will the
proposal have significant results in?
a. A substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area?
b.
r`
A conflict with any designations, objectives,
policies, or adopted glans of any governmental
„
entities?
._
xg'y
•
�\
o. An impact upon the Vlaity or quantity of
�!
ti
existing consumptive or non - consumptive
recreational opportunities?
it
, t v
� b, " •��
Page..
YES !_�1� No
8. Tra,r,ortation. Will the pro gnificant
posal have si
results in:
'+rt
a; Generation of substantial additional vehicular
movement?
h.- •-- Effects on existing streets, or demand far
"
new street construction?
j
C. Effects on existing
g parking facilities,
L
or
demand for Yierr parking?
d, Substantial jmpaet upon existing cransporta�
tion•systems ?a - - �
/
e� Alterations to present patterns f
p rns of circula -•
or movement of people andlar goods?
rte= Alteratigne to or effects on present and.
/ potential water-borne, rail, mass transit or -'
sir traffic?
Increases in traffic hazard,, to motor vehicles,
>tbicycliscs
or pedestrians?
9. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have 1.
significant 'results in.-
`
C
A disttitbanci to the integrity of archaeological,
palecntologi,al, and /or historical resources'
hr. A'alth. Safety, and Nuisance_ Factors_ Will the
proposal "have sign icant reresults- in:
a.~ Cveation of an- hazard or potential health
hazard?
hazard?
b. Exposure'of people-to Potential health hazards?
�C
C. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous
substances ;L4 the event of an accident?
d. An increase in the number of individuals
or species of vector or pathenosenic
organisms or the exposure of people to such
organisms?
e. Increase in existing noise levels?
f. Exposure of
xP people to potentially dangerous
{
noise levels?
f
g. The creation of objectionasle. odors?
h. ,,An increase in light or glare?
uj
WE
Page 3
- T
i3a NO
11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant
_
results ins
a. The obstruction or degradation of axr, scenic
vista or view?
\1`
b The creation of an offensive
site ?�\
c.' A conflict with the Objective of des;(Pated
or potential scenic corridors? r
/
12. Utilities 44s) ublic Services. Will the prop '
have a si '� P p teal
gn
�cant need for new systems, or
alterations t4- the following;
_D
a. Elect7,, c power?
b. Nat'ral or packaged gas?
c. Communications systems?
d. Water supply?
e. Walt" water facilities?
f. Flood control structures?
a- Solid waste facilities?
h. Fire protection?
i. Police protection?
J. Schools?
= k. Parks or other recreational facilities ?'
1. Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads and flood control facilities?
M- Other governmental services?
13. Enerev and Scarce Resources, 7i11 the' roposal
have significant results ins
a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy?
f
ba Substantial increase in demand upon existing
sources of energy?
`�-
C. An increase in the demand for development of
vew sources of energy?
- .. d. A � increase or perpetua;!�on 6f the
tonsumption
of non - renewable £orz!k of energy* when feasible
renewable sources of energy are available?
?age 5
xsS �LNYaM No
e� 8ubs�antial depletion of any nonrenewable or _.
seartre natural resource?
lk. Mandator`' Findings of significances,
a. Does ,the project have the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife Populatiq,,% to drop
belou, self sustaining levels, threaten,.to
eliziftate a plant or aninal community, redilce
the.tri or restrict the range of a r e or
eada4�kyered.�;lant or anima; or eliminate
i1 .•':. impart,�nt ex eapjes -at' -the major periods of
Calif6i`nia hik�tory or prehistory?
b. Does tihe`. roj 1�t have the potential to achieve
short-terd1, t the disadvantage of long-term, -1
envircnment<1 goals? (A short -term impact on the
environment � one which occurs in a relatively .
briefs definitive period of time while tong-
term impacts will endure well into the future).Y
a. Does rye project have Impacts which are
individually limited but, cumulatively
considerable? (Cumaatx vel Y considerable
r ab_
e
means itb4t the. incremental effects of an
individual project are considerable when viewed
in connection with the efiectsruf past projects,
and piobable future projects),
d. Dnes the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adv'zse e£fecrz
,on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
YI.
DISCUSS SS!ON Op+ ENS x:.o'.T. EHTAi EVALUATION (i.e., of affirmative answress� Ta
the above questions plus a dizcussion of proposed mitigation measures ),
W �.
Page ,T
TII; DETMMI?7
On the basis of this initiel evaluation;
I find the proposed proje t COULD NOT have a w� f
an the environment, and a ;SEGATIVE DECLc1Rs1TIO, gni�xxant effect
be prepared.
I find that although the Proposed project quid have a signifit nt
effect on the environment, there vill not be 'a significant affect
In this case because the mitiSation mgisures describ'ed on an
attached sheet have been added_ to the ;project. A NEGAIIVE '
DECLARATf= R,EL, BE PREPARED
2 fixkd the Proposed ra•act WN hav
- � p p P 3 f. a s3g�tificant effect on the
enviraae% t, _.and :an G'I3t0'.� 3tT I`TAdT REPORT is required.
Late
Signat e
;6 'Title
n
RESOLUTION No, -
__. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
__. APPROVING C0NDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 85 -07 FOp AUTOTP.ANS
LQC TED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE MENUS ANTS ON THE
- WEST SIDE Oi" ROBERDS IN 111E GE,tERAL C,MRCtAL DISTRICT
WHEREAS, an the . Sth day of Marth, 194v,- a xomplete application was
f filed by ban usher for review of the above - described project, znd
f _ WHEREAS, on the 8th day of May, 1985, the Ka
ncho Cuaamoncya planning
j
Commission -hel& e- public hearing to consiaer the above- described project
follows: NOW,, THERE'3RE, the Rancho Cuiamonga Planni,j Cot" scion resolve' as
SECT --- TIION I- That the following findirls can :be met:
I, That the proposed use is: in accord with'tho! general
Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and
the purposes of the district in which the site is
located.„
Z. That the proposed use, together, with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety, or welfare, or materially
injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity.
3. That the proposed use co�vplies With each of eiae
applicable provisions Of the Development Code.
- -J
SECG_SaN 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the
enY.t ronment and that a Negative Declaration is issued an May 8, 1985.
SEC, TIO 3= That Conditional Use Per"M;= No. 85 -07 is approved
subject to the following conditionsi' j
1. Applicant shall not leave customer cars parked on Roberds
Street after the c4atelusiMm of business hours,
2. Applicant shall dr5agnate the parking .stall closest tc the
drive approach as "Compact-cars only ".
S, A minimum of four 15 gallon size trees shall be planted in
this front setback area end appropriate ground cover and
shrubs.
i
4' .. . y.. z' � aj .` � .. t•. V 'tea ��� �. ,'fts.
x
Resolution No.
CUP 85-02
Page,,
AND ADOPTED THIS 8th DAY tF Mff, 19f
Hi PLANNING COMMISSION OE `rHE cl7i OF RANCHO'UCAMON�A %'
BY:
Dennis L. Stout, Chairman
ATTESTS
Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary
J
I, kick Gomez, Deputy Secreiary �f tFM Planning Commission of the City of I
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that-the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and, adopted by the-Planning ,commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular peting - the 11iiining rpmmission held
on the 8th day of May, 14.185, by.-the fallowing voC&tq it
AYES: COMMISSIONERS;
NOES. COMyMISSIONERS.•
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
-
.i
lr � y
pp ,
(� .�` Y.•L. uN. O'�VD 6•ui A iT....a .m �Nq
r 2 q(E� NA GeYi°
y 6Db �. -.Ut� a.f}. t JCL NiOE yUjL� qO
vi• {
/� 9 u FEi I
C .>:.V d V bs� Nyti As..N Ua.,AnU ct AA -10} -
O
E 6 m L E,m du r1 W q
V E},O U'LLO CCL n0�btl. Cdd
ON O yL, NO.�'r =YY. Ow Y'C L��w LLtl w- CcjL U�• -_ '
z WELL A�NC�« :C.�NLLV Oi9 Od. O �YG nda� u t -
mEL NO' ^ _:'f a 03 OCUn
.. U opv cE� Svc
C .� m},.u. YcA O wtLi f+yih
4 E
•� aCU it +uu3+...j LLMYC autY] i�n0 YmU U.�m N9
aan °mcv
}ea ate° a
bNa b'c 3 A o4 UV T .�� T CON • Lb.�R Cy,,,
i.EE+ s ue
L2Amud..
pA Ei� A Yip w
Na a C r C ,a ^ C C � V 4
q.r �td'^aVl^A� QaYR qOG Cn4 ^�a�}F >aGy OHM
L' 9' mC LCD N Nmt
• ECL >4L0 U� .p 6m}•Y pp C'^ >V.
Ad O ECwa
O G4R as =6 CI � �. - 3 t1r0.
aW €u Euss� <j3��
51 V n Y " Y E N o e '✓v: m L a °a m O �. O
c y ao
i A x
Lv aY. v ; « er.- v°i �KC ona•� -y us4 :.
ovN-un as s.>nCA S� 6 ca'rvr Ta" LNLCYS a >�co«
,t. I
D EE i
E t �. ga h'
tz Y. N v M > N yaNCN
S~ VC • N O Ut Wp�'q 'J
•�. R A .a 7;OEn C N
a N
O O A • ELz £ q gC a CYO U�
n OCri At N
+O O
c 1 W 4
V � �� W d� ri a� q'N'•A4 L V
6
At a L6 Ablp
° m gym,. '. = a ati q G
L
k r
GY C 4. .. 'T r..
))�`_ Y. G NC C 9 a.: 40 Q4Ymt YYS5ffR 4 -
1; -
(` L `b O a q LAU G�Zc
k.9 6 sG �.. -•ti A E�.h. is NLM µ
I�
' d^Y ^
O •'.7.. EY C CuE
d
¢ ^e
q L�
°i.m°
^>p
V
L
gEON
CO p 4pV0 3
LCp Oy t«
ENE
4 L S
& bN
rq'�
0
M fr
��•^ y Omit 6 °a
U
O.w =.q OaiN l�iL qtO
L Nym6 ye
M
..
�•
U5 -dU ^O ON
_
9vir La:COi'y N
�. 0
if{/
.O
OCCO..
},,
�M10in •J r•C aLO
4g11- mb L'. >[.>Z
1!-CL-
Y A+q Oy 6n
qNN
W9r°..N f.1C �V V <Cw
L =Vpd4N
04 cs
y„
2L TNK
-�6 'o
•Ly 6ti a�
-I
4
C•�•` r
udt
icy
'
�C'.
° na` ROEN �9
qN
�>T
9
R« HC
rt41
L Iw.0
O
GC.
��A t a0
VUO
COa CZO 0..:10 tau
16f O.�
�q�LLVCr C NV
«r'00
r.0
YL N�
00 VyNAr
Y=
DgNW
�^ 9NN LyyO
RCyN
C o10SL dK
•
r.p 9
Et ^t.. y"O�L 01.~.+^
C�".YU 7t,-=
�.r•..03 0a'Cn Cq.
'CL Y.•�A- j V9
1`
hW l°. €�y �T1yC
d'r 4.apn
.N }9rq ON
G TCY
�NH.-
d` W umLEUY �d
C9a �6a'y pN
G42R y fl1
<Et+o °a
c Oaf vi. r'is saV° 4u
o rr . Wr�
rc •` t; .m
. x
1 a _
N
�1 wC 101
s
CCC aOL o.^.. -. .11aN Gy
^1 Y �'.,. wve °� 'o
�3 9K .T94.9
T 4 a+ «ao. �r vi`
a '•.L..v o�yyii
N ^q N^
LO
q n NRi CR
m y
C N
eL =
O £ O.O,cq
L L;t
Mm^°•q
NCO N ° O
NN L90
i °�
uy
Q.rgsL 004r:
LCOVn =
S•s°+d yN
pN �i gi�E 55..
GC CN <v9�G
y1y 4
Wy. rL
.°r
U O U N E. Gt 4
r• !. 9 W L E ?, C
C^ E �,d.� `�
M L. C? m C V
L,.. 6 p V
^V94 Y03°VL�� Mu
aC ML
6
=r
�r4 'emu
Qy
dip
SR.WQ N1Q•,C �r
O
Wa
Ew «U
.r'=rNV
E N 9 O CO�bT
^CS w LyU
bW »60b
VRC Uy W a»,
V0O CQ
=TY« Or
pM
OUy
L -. .d N- Lr
^R�
NY yq
CRO 7
» N Cn6
92 t ;. wa
Y� 26
VN uS � �i.cC ty�
L N`a u
2 °1T
YEy
..-=U LC
•
nO' V�
�. �. »y
`TL d0� 9NL
V 0
.�.•e
C� W CQ� q
= d
p'0.N ��..
L+.O.OA•a Ky b
�
r 'd
� y'••D`� Y =9,.
U n t�i1 aRe
'.p` D C � � � p
cN
^11m DR io °tL1
�
c uLAV v
a �yc
RcE
j�q L°
Y6. p
y44 99
.•Ley c. inn mn.°c
T .,•..2'.p9 �.� 0 y
N�� CSC
c is a.�goca
qC. >°
0Y c a,n,
r F LC d N
V)
Y^ 9y
O
Y � «9 E61`
N
9y Py
.OZ y
1�-1Q
Ya>
Zl�
CqU
°
°V C,F
R�OO
q��q
�L LGW Cj�
C01 OAC C01r
TY Ry
OdTLpO
Q6 €P6 r✓='C4 .+O `OL
KA 6ta�Nn 1= CnO9��fUu4
Y S VYON
.�pbV
^V 04 tC6di VLF
<ll 9aU
N.r:
UAn
69dO trl� °
V °Q
-.v
r
qM Rr0GU
N aY N
aOgO
,iCP
b1 'O„tCi
CY ^iLd
�f�/�
W
^qOa
°
r Ad
pa
n �L
a �n
°r U d u.
bm 'Ld O - .' b.y
E >o-
� -F
•
Ns,n
d C
LNOO
ZZ-
N
yf
N o
u 1f1
d Out
aG asL PnL z4
a of W N C G
t� i! . d q °qY G
Ebd ,.4 -•
q.Qb °
Nu
Y
yT.
O
QD.
OOY.Lra
L= L�
Li �g�An���L L� VO�'C aL
O' HP
fiCUO
VC
�Y �•�p.
�O N L51 W u L Z.
dv
ENy
>A
001
u�ti
K
YoL C
c�ZA. -
V
qU L
M+.a
O H
Y
Ady x�.dd t VY
C.-.GQ
QL N
q.Lit
p-
Qy�
ErN
{COs
x
djN Y.L 'J��
ti
i^
rdY
KY.YL:p � a0
s arc o i. er v L
E N L
E G
or
_
7cMa
1^ ML •LN A3,06 zY
i.O RQN
f
44
j 4
t6
l
tea
O
a v c
q
I_
�C
AG R ..C.s GNE
A dGgy.
,... ...
O
?. C q
r
a N n
5
du
,pq�
a
.OdC
QT O u\�
nLAw
FnL O
r 2
°kw ... _... ..
C
d
/I..
L G L �Dst O j' f W} NY
�E>
VyL�
2uL
K O.X a ArOi Y� °OKCUy
CK �L
E
Aw
qy
MC
V G
A �i a2�A �0�9
G�.O Qd
c
4wL.°
N°
as ud°p b "I",
A
U°
"
es
iL v yu ..TL.
NN i .y -°
G°o
ntq
rR5
Ad
�N
vai
'aY
M4 -2,5
d
S 4J�u OO NO y�aN
K °� L
dr r
d:E*
ad
N > n7g G
+..,
.LAN
L
°' cEdyd
n ��
O�
Q VP
ti �Y0
O YryC
n
=Cwa
4 rLrE u Y pi o N s
y.� ^ A Ca OL�dd0�
i.
4 VO
V EE
d
ctwo
QLwL..m
>°
KaK
fGuai 6t1 d9 F•rOC CC
tLb
°A^' L
i
AA.
�
H N .p Y a+ N N r S 3++ t 4 G U C S T 9 4 2
LE'^ Na <Rm ♦b uN E E'^
W4 WEE savvy
O
u..c�
m u
V
E
G�6 �1°LOL L U 2,' m
m2 UY ^O
y 6
V-. G
� V G
LOS t4
O a
E .. V
V n
nN
SaL7a C
CIVV 'Oy YU 0 °A LL O
Onj O =�ydc A
A� t !
L S
SEC. j
j'-+Ee au a 5
a+..a qY E
5
�
EE .
t09
�� a
LNE 6 Nm6 G
G,y V.. 9. �
�d
7; 6:5 ° y m W
t!.2
E� y
_ y
y
u T .
. O RQ W aU V d
d o
�
N y O.
A J
.02 ^
� Z
Zs—
64
a= c T V A V d
d p
y _
�>
VAX a
a2 V
r4CR 1
1�4¢ �LLLVA6 !r4O^ I
A-- a
VZ
I y
yIl � hl J N
N r1 N
4U�-
r�.yihN n
nC.dNY� a
y uC E� L 2
.
. L y
CyL Y
Yt p
yCy 1
V-
G Y
N1
ApU� L
L L
L yu LA Q
QO
N..
A t
d y
C cY
N= A
t «
« L d
y n
G N
3L.CC c
0o L
LoyS
XtL 0
E <y _
YA4 �
�Y 9 as .Q V
U C V M1 �.�y,� La .
.VQ c :+`b C_
_ N
♦ D
ai
_
d °
L
LrtA -
O
o= tT y
Nn c
cvo
^ m
ul
E O u M
yo s
IV!
^
O^ a 4
•^d°.. °
L6W. O A
A9N �
Pa.GYG 6
6E Yj rp µ r~ �
�N29q n Ep.s9. <
<C YV U
Ups^
-
a_ U
y u 9 ° _ A
A c Y w L
L N
L Y
_...-
' '
'-..�',
L
-- ri C a e m v '
'•�` a. ct T
T u ` u
09 u
Y+ V L.J.L �
G ^ L4<
u- Y
�L +
V4 nN G
X00
g4pzy� • Ndy.
L
4
��
I�;
y U
u C•U p t E N
u
d
A
N adi
NLdp
!�y 64 C �
rQ
N4.
w•a
2 `
n. GNOy,
�'.
n yL„
ar La
TAR, N
u
VYL P`' or �.
LPy
Sa
f
/�
•.
L
Q
L. c.Y O._
Ydu
,•O
,.nw -~.
.Y}.s °� ^P
`. E-q L.
ow - //�
.-
� ..�
v
�. rmu
- a
uON••
_ N ,e.. , r /ia e
�.^ r`.
µ.:RE ac. L}„:``� / u
c L
O
qT
•spa
Y•TO L ^...
q a 4.�.r
y=
�
u ..�
'.
O.
-
•
UI Ld
0E1
1Da. =w�
i
N
Cb D1
YN'•r P yY,'O \\{{�
L U AN � Y/ ��
a
�^
O q •�
�
�y y.
Y n yI
•f
q`
i
>r
•`y N C
�PP�
r�AAO
Wit. !�C
N"•YO'O CP �3
N ti..
Nu
N
0Y
db
L
d
T EE
y E µEY
-
4 Y Y
'
- •
'b
Y >A
.Y
OOrW
A^
O
O.r.
�s
L`
^
Y.y
n LnY u�
g V
Y C •Y 4.0
C
`
4A
C06Jrr0 q Vv
• °
I._ I
`I
I
I
Ln
A
c b
`•L
b P... 1``
...
qm
t o N
2P "N N
6 A
CC 01•
�
CL.L.0
y •
N Ny
L ,
Py y `I`
U �. _
T. L
�0.
F A n o
O�Udw
u i•�
n
L 6 U
6NP
+.
g
Y CEd1p L L�
L
N
d
�
a V..
� C W • pM
9
q
.V Uu
U •d N
�O y_u 11
+,y9Y �` G
U
aQQ3
=�
aq .BUY
SHCg��
Yyu�
NyYubC
=y
'•
q'�
,}•. M'
D
Ir
VV d 0
O.YYq`M
nPgyR
as Z
O
DA
C
�' Tr
q�
d
a'
Nby-�C
-..:_ _
nYQ L�^
a W�
d[lniaO E
P }• C
dU
t yuOL�
r
0
L
W
_
c��
iA
O u `.
cV
b t
rNU �
(SVY
•
Ln9 Cr04
-•: -
Y a=
PY a+d L�.
:;� u °•
rb N
m..
L
N L ^40A1,
b ap0. a
CL° Y.
°,cos
v
aA.
p
yN
N�ONNUuCA�
d.��y�
A �a3�
__
G� AF LV
II ^p�..
G
e•- NC`GYI
A -.c
�. N�.
G =
p.... QUy,o
Y D�V
q•QDC
°NO
a Y
° M14t
ViYI�a
YO
C
g-. 1� O
d
4
\_ C� °t M O `.OD OL 09 +F°• d dC�dY V -•Y.. 1..
L O!
W
5,
w4i A. Lc�aO AV °L C' 4y °zlq m � Yp
� L° W w Y � y Q V RN •V..0.. U. 1 P� ]C ":
p AE sA
V Y.o
q > v ar o v
�V.LCM ° OL
S• '�f "'CA VP`EW �^S °au 1,i�M U bL V Yc
O rp
"NY U� of .'L,
9.jb - -Y. � @I..C'IN •2 C!n �.
^�A ,a T. '� ° °.Nq•i k €'n may.,. c
T+tlalw�0 Ta.m..G b�NC uC dll � 'u GA y V Ny w
OL •p id ":.b NVO H� army yl Fu YI•. ZN m
6 N 0 E Y g q i C Y y Y.
GgC1 6W �fn- ALL'
ENS
End CL V� 'PON dm 06W Ob. Ct " ° O.m�° •i
i
W N
L d L AL O d° N w� P C•V- O1 w Y9ab P N+ L M NT
m b �L N W V V Cw y N. dY
lo
O N .pCO O`tt Li 6dt >w N .O'yv a_b C °
y6W mr- <LwN y.°NN yb Y-u 4V 4w wi r:L�. li L Q .
{
T �� C) 1 Viuw N O tl J Yd
O'.pl N ° N u'� b • .�0 � G
O b
Q qW �:l yL�V SOU = .O AWL
Ny V 'COI CN q Q ` � _ia•°O
dti md°. a RLYNIni .•°,� c r.-I m y. y o.�y.,:..:.»
Nq m.F qY• ° !C q yb�y.
V L C V •'1 t L O •Jtf
nN`a
ni
q
L N
_ L Y S 1 Q Z L � - L 9 P. y �' ' `P N • A N C
•Vi V C 0 0
U G
� �� 2w i Val O\b0, O°.O � y= s
0.n 6 C
L W F °
� mgNC 4L Urt NI y � C - L.
•�, r u � � .o. $ fi dNt3
L �.. • 1 � W � N �d -.
f
ct
o
.. A
•• c c ,.. C,ICT
a
w.
;J
`-
go
ell
Y C
O� ... tl
'^•'«w
tl
L
_
«.� p�j.
w
rya N _-
,
�IA
UO�
-
n
tlG VUL OS
°. �:N C O
C N'
O G
�V<'A
S
�
�,
_ �
�• L U. �
C Y n• '
�
.L
A C L.
gi
'LL
OL Z L *�.Y
OVA
Z,
R wp
G`V
v14y.
•
'YOE�
O VY 04
'O
r
O
�
1
�
tl
pq
ON
Tw Y O
GUO
�
U
wp n
VC.
Lp ��
.4 - iff:s
eN
K
>Jt?°
i
C
p
O C
O O 4 w N O
92 -u L `
O >
V
Y
•
.�
a
W:C �O 11A
�laT
Y.Q m
V ^.
4 N. G
'Q
u V
Y L
tl
6
/'
w
Ltz
4
a
LSa+ A
nw. ` `� .� •
u
c°
rw
isi Aav
O
p .•,Y�c
pCG p.�y�.
A
L.Lry
��
Dw N..
'
WUO
9tl
O y
VC,, •a.9 atliV
SO6 V8 �U Yir
4N.
Qw«
M•y
CST
�..�.
� ;
.'WSJ
�
O.
Y w
H9
L ^� 400 V�
iH
<
Cf
VV
�
K
r`.w •k 0. u� JI.O
G
uX�
t+
�«
a
1.v
L
C
0
— CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA °ijcnaro
STAFF REPORT
Z
DATE: May 8, 1985 � W7 ti
J
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY: Howard Fields, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: VARIANCE 85 -57� = FYSHEft - A request to -perm tc ero lot
line along t, rrwesterly side of subject property on 25
acres of land � n the Gehtral Commercial District located
on the north side of Rase Line, west of Roberds' - APN
092 -009.
L, l
RELATED FILE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85 -07
l
ANALYSIS: Site development criteria set forth in the Development Code
under commercial uses specify the required interior side property line
setback adjacent to other existing or planned commercial development
shall be 5 feet,,and is typically used as a landscaped strip.
The applicant has requested a deletion of this requirement for the-
following reason. If the required 5 foot setback is provided, a useless
and dangerous 5 foot wide alley would be created between two concrete
block buildings. In. lieu of this requirement, the applicant proposes concrete-
block Tot line technique which will abut the proposed building directly
zgainst an existing commercial building. As required by the Uniform
Building Code, the proposed building will be 'solidly grouted reinforced
concrete block with a 4 -hour fire wall rating. No, doors or windows are
Y_ _
existing or proposed for either side bf the property line in whictr the
applicant proposes to u�,p the zero lot line technique: R
If this technique is considered, the proposed building orientation 'on
the project site will allow full screening of the service bay doors and
repair activities from Base Line T;;4d.
FACTS FOR FINDING: State law, as well as the Development Code, gives
the Planning Commission the authcrity to approve a variance for certain
development standards only when special circumstances applicable to the
property such as size, shape, or t6pography would create undue
hardships. Also, variances may only be granted when the strict
enforcement of the Development Code would result in practical difficalty
or unnecessary 'ha dshi i nt i h
I ps ncons-ste w t the objectives of the
Development Code. The size and shape or thi; parcel does create a
hardship and practical difficulty upon subject FJ'Ad'-posal.
Irk a
PLANNIK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
-> Variance 85 -02 - Fisher
May 8, 1985
Page 2
Before a variance the Planning Commission shall make
the
following j indi"'�gs;
{{
1. That a proposed use is in accordance w46he General
j
Plan, the Development Code, and the purpps s of the Land
Use categorJ in which the project is locate`.
2. That'' the proposed use, together' 'wits 1conditions
applicable therato, will not be detrimental to the public
,_. ,healtho�,,safety and, welfare, or injurious to properties or
improrei,ents, in the,;vicinity.
3. That `�14 proposed use will comply with each of the
applicable provzs -ons to the bevel¢ ?dent Code.
_t
CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public 4naring
in The DaiT.Y ReQort newspaper and all property owners within 300
Meet of the subject site have been notified. In additigA,`i+ublic
hearing notices have teen posted on the,subject property.
'
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended 'that the Planning Commission
.'
consider ail input and elements of this project. If after such
consideration the Commission can support the Facts for Finding,
the option a attached Resolution would;be appropriate,—
,+ .
n
Re c't lly sub fitted,
G om 1�
i ' Pl a er
1�RG:HF:ns
\
Attachment: rxf --tt "A" - Site `Plan
Resolution of Approval
A,
;l
1
Sys j,
.• € rr• f a F
y i w srss•: kw f� eei• , � �;; ��; � ,
a ' Y
� a
-;
Y
Sr
co
LYN
k I'F �,
zq-3
,.
jI RESOLUTION NO,
A RESOLUTION OF TtANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION '
APPROVING VARIANCE tij0.
85 -02 TO DAN FISHER LOCATED ON THE
NORTH SIDE OF BASELINE
AVENUE AND ON THE WEST SIDE OF
ROBERDS IN THE GENEPiL
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
c
0
WHEREAS, on the 5th�day of March, 1985, an application was filed and
accepted on the above »descr 4ed project; aid
(Z;
WHEREAS, on.the 8th.day of May, 1485,E�he Planning Commission
held a
duly advertised public hearing pursuant to See.`tion 65854 of the Califo6la
Government Code.
1,
SECTION 1: �� The Railcho Cucamonga Planning :Commission has made
the
following findings.
1. That strict
; or literal interpretation and
enforcement of 'the specified regulation would result
in practical i�ifficu)ty or unnecessary physical
-'
hardship intonttistent ith the objectives of the
Development-.Code.
2. That there are exceptional = or extraordinary
circumstances lar conditions applicable to the
property involved
or to the intended use of, the
property that
11do not apply generally to other
propc::::�ies ir-( the same district.
3i. That strict or literal interpretation and
enforcement of, the specified 'regulation Would ;
deprive the appiiicant of privileges enjoyed by the
owners of other 'properties in the same district.
4. That the. granting of the Variance will not
constitute a grant
of special privilege inconsistent
'
with the limitations
on other properties classified
in the same district.
5. That the grant5ng of the Variance will not bbf
detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
t\ ^
improvements in the vicinity.
6—b
a
T`
1
c Resolution No.
Variance No. 85 -02
�..a; Page
e
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8th DAY OF MAY, 1985.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF 'HE CITY OF RANCHO CUC.AMONGA
8Y:
Dennis L. Stout, Chairpan
.ATTEST..
Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary
I, Rick Gomez, Deity Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
reo,�:,rarly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planting Commission of the
City of Rancho 'Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 8th day of May, 1985, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES. COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSTTPNERS:
'AOSENT: COMMISSIONERS.
t- {
.E' _ is Q \..
x
A�
U
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SrOA.FF REPORT
i
O ,C
BATE: y 1, 1985 a 3
TO Planning Commission
t %►tr.
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubb,, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krali, Engineering Technician
t
SUBJECu: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARr.EL MAP 9084 = FORECAST NMTGAGE
A division o; 20.9 acres of and into 1 pir-cel in =tn Hillsidp .
Residential Development District located north of Almond Street.,
west of gig Tree Road r`
I. PROJECT RTC SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Actiont Requested: Appraval of Parrei Map.
B. Purpose: To create a 20 .,) acre parcel and at 58.98 a4le remainder,
C. Location: North of Almond Street, west o(. Big Tree RoaY.,
D. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 - 20,9 acres, Remainder Parcel - 58.98 acres,
E. Existing Zonin Hillside Residential and open space.
F. ExistiWtand Use: Vacant.
G. Surrounding Laind Use:
North - Vacant.
South - Vacant — Approved Tentative Tract No. 10210.
last - Vacant.
West-- Vacant..
H. Surrounding usneral Plan and Development Code Desi nations:
North Hillside Residentia , open space.
i
South - Hillsda Residential, VL (less than 2 du/ac).
East - Hillside Residential', open space.
West_- Hillside Residential, open space, flood control.
II. Site Characteristics: Slopes dithin the project site' range frog 8l
percent to 20 percent. Vegetation consists of dense chapparal brk.,sy� d
-grasses and weeds with a number R trees scattered throughout the ait,�'
Big Tree Road, which provides access to the foothill and canyon areas
located along the easy boundary of the project.
ITEM K
PLANNING COMMI�5SION STAFF A PORT
Environmental•Assessment and Pai e4l Map 9084
May 1, 1985 ;
Page 2
A portion of the site is located within the Alquist - Priilo sp' cial
c study earthquake zone. p
III. BACKGROUND: The reason the applicant is requesting the Parcel Map is to
create a parcel with a mintl.,um area of 20 acres as require�:<to settle a
foreclosure,,proceeding and provide an area for a water facility for Tract
No. 10210, which is neart,;g recordation.. A more,e)�tegsive explanation is
contained in the attached. letters lab u " Exhibits u and E. The shape-,
and location of the proposed Parcel Mend related Tract No. 10210 are
shown en Exhibit A. The actt.al tentati�e\Parcel, trap i "s_ shown on t`-,Nibit
B.
The applicant had pre0o6sly Submitted a tentative tract (No. 12376) for
tha area contained wfr in Parcel 1 of ;{his Parcel Map. The street and
l
lot layout for the lras�, the accompanyfing area :Master PSan,, and approved
Tentative Tract No:.. 14210 are shown on Exhibit C. The EIR for Tract
12376 was approved, but the tract itself. was denied for various reasons.--
The applicant has recently submitted another tentative tract (No. 12947),
,
on the same area, which was considered incomplete by(-*at4ff therefore,
not accepted for furt,"4 r processin 4 this time.
Aft
IV. -ANALYSTS: The En: for Tentative �,it' Mo. 12376 inferred that a possible
carthqudKe ,'auit could be located within the area of the parcel map. The
'-
preferred proceduve is to;,have a Geological Study prepared and approved
prior to approval of a project. Due to the time tionstraints` imposed by
the foreclosure proceedings, this would be impractical in this case.
Therefors,7-,,a ondition has been iticluded which requires that a Geol'Dgical
Study be completed and approyad prior to the issuance of building permits
or the approval
of any furthdr proposed developments on the property with
a note to this effect to be placed on the Final Parcel ,Map, fseg
Condition 1.1).
}i
Secondly, City policy required that dedicated access be, provided to all
L
parcels of a subdivision. When Tract No. 10210 records= it will provide
access to Parcel I and the remainder parcel via the streets as shown on
Exhibit A. However, it is more likely that this Parcel Map will record
prior tq the t'r`act, therefora,-=4 condition has been added requiring that
the access roads shown on Exhibit A be dedicated prior to recordation of
I,
the Final Parcel MQ, (see Condition G.2).
In addition, the pe,opQrty owner's attorney has I requested by telephone
that access be provided `o the remainder parcel through Parcel -I in order
to allow maximum design flexibility for the, remainder parcel. It is
noted that both tentative tracts proposed by the Developer of Parcel 1
• have provided such an access road. A possible solution is to require
that a blanket easement be placed over Parcel 1 inavor of the remainder
parcel for the future dedication and improvemdit oi''a public street`pn an
PLAa6KNG COMMISSION STAFF REPORT n
Environmental Assesa;nt and P &rcel. ►dap 9084-
stay 1, 1,985
is Page 3 j
� 1
alignment established by an approved Master Plan for either parcel, (see.
Condition Go.3 ) &- l
Lastly, 5teff °had requested that th�e applicant withhold the sutmittai of
I
the Parcel Map until-' an. acceptable Tract and. Area Master Plan are
completed for the total area in order to avoid imposing poss�lt.,b adv/�rse
design constraints" on the property. Again, the time coq- ` aims ire p'sed
by the forecltisure proceedings h ve made this req)est ii;factical. The
parcels 1a) be created,,-21t and F.6- 'acrIes,, are most probably 'large .enough a
to provide sufficient1,flexibility to allow for the future design of an
ac�:eptable.pr ,)ject. _
V. F%VIRONMENTAL REVIEW. -Also attachsd or your review and consid�ratian is
l {art u the, Initial :Study a:- -- completed by the applicant « =' Staff has
r,', completed Part IlP of the In'iWV� Stuc�yj the environmental checklist„ and
has conducted a field investgge -14on. . Upon completion. and review of the
Initial Study and field investigation, Staff.,'found no adverse impacts on
thl environment as a result of the proposed subdivision..
VI. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have beer sent--to surrounding
0 property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper..; "Posting at the
si -te has also been completed.
VIZ. REC6MENDATION: It is recommended that the Alann [ig'Cotrmissior; adopt the
attached reso ution conditionally approving Tent Live Parcel Map 9084 ansf
authorizing the issmalce of a Nega"ve Declaration.
Respectfully subm' ted ,
LBH: .ka r "r
fttechmeats: Exhibits A - l
Resolution ;
Recommended Conditions .,
Initial Study
r
�;v,��
g 9041
t
® g 1t
rl
0
t 1
B
i AlWowd .C. i[Y3t
• y lu
s xL
-�
CITY OF OROJECT
R. ANC HO CUCHlv�iliVGA T�TLE: :'iGINITY MAP
� i
'l� NG1 � RING DIVISION EXHIBIT;
r
r
�;v,��
g 9041
t
® g 1t
rl
0
t 1
B
i AlWowd .C. i[Y3t
• y lu
s xL
-�
CITY OF OROJECT
R. ANC HO CUCHlv�iliVGA T�TLE: :'iGINITY MAP
� i
'l� NG1 � RING DIVISION EXHIBIT;
r,r
m��� r...,.... Fes.... �•� � �. � «e...... �..)
TENTAVVE FAWEL MAP NO. 9084
;.° %n Thd c ;fy c/' ltoicfso caraman�,• � .
�-' � E'�: d�4yrlr isv sl d A+Miws d!M SEir�t afS°gS'at, .� -
• e/. �t � e+t�jrne'ron�•�f M i2 ri.� early o. ,San6d'+weinr _
• unt,. r.� /ett,l°e,
• ' SEC 17,�Ll.�i,R7.17J � _ ,,,,� � )
t rrx
`
.
n
%J
S. f2 OF S.E. L'4 SE-- 17
(T.l.t t, .27.W.)
_ l6w _
r !aN
1
k
77N. AR- hLAV�ine ._ .'/•s��i'i': rnyi:,,� s'Sd lwrs.. � .
BUIBIT
Ty .+, s, _ ..i >Y t !m'o a /tro.7ufst �A4Sjaj� MlEr+o..S+s. `• .
��11 ��yi.Se"'� lx.� -.. �U J.z+�.i L i. .3•+; 3 '� t ,Y � *�., µ CY ��` ��`'ss•��^C�'"'.�
rq
�� �;GQJN7Y.C7P'OnN HP..RM.hRI? /Nq � ��
P v.,4. P,
r Mas�er� Pla o Fe r
"` .: ♦�� `� �� ♦ Tr 1237(,
1
i
c T
4
r�
• _S 1Y J , _ �♦ f 1 rfi �S
< �,�,. •uw}�Cf'} ar snnr
,i 1 QTR!• ^T :._ �..��
nl
I'MT11
til 11
tI
G
CITY OF = PROJECT P.M. 40,34
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE; _ STREET PATTERNS
4e ENGINEERING DIVISION EXHI�M -ctf
' "0(
r - .
C U R PQ RA T i ON,
-
Construction jDevelopmen -
April 1, 1985
F
'Rancho = Cucamonga. - x
Engineering Department' >-
9320 Baseline Rd.
Rancho Cucamonga, CA.. 91730
Attention. Barrye Hanson
Re. Tentative Parcel Map No. 9084
Dear Barrye:
The following is the information you requested recfiarding'Tentative
Parcel Map Nom _9084.
-i,- -- REASONS FOR - CREATING A. STNGLE -ODD .SHAPED PARCEL.
We acquired through foreclosure the real property known as
Tentative Tract #10210 in 1982. As part of the original
foreclosure action,.my cpmpany also acquired an option to
purchase an additional 113 acres from a Mr. Fred Schiuholf.
The minimum amount of property that could be purchased under
the option agreement was 20 acres. In:)rlaer to satisfy
Cucamonga County Water District requirements for Tract.410210,
it it necessary to place .a water facility on the✓.patcewl -ref
land immediately north of the subdivision. Accordingly,
we exercised our option and purchased a 20.93 acre parcel
that included.the,water facility site. We paid for the'
above 20.93Grg. ci tee. i n fL1L- `Lhoni�_ #n_�p` mcT;lr�t
split. -- we immediately thereafter filed Tentative Tract Map No.
1237E t.- ,parcel off these 20.93 acres from Mi.- Schuholf.'s
land. After several meetings and a considerable length
of time spent properly planning the subdivision layout
with staff, the city planning commision required , environ-
mental impact report before allowing us to proceed vrith the
processing of our tract map. The ETR sited many concerns
regarding the developniant that would take a considerable
length af,time to address before we could proceed with the
processing of the subdivision map.
4333 $a 4ine Road -Suite 290 + Rancho Cucamonga, California 9I730
•z 'f `1
U
C
In the interim, Mr. Schuholf started foreclosure pro-
ceedings to take back all the optioned property including
the 20.93 acre parcel that we had already paid for because
he felt an inordinate amount of time had passed. We havp
since delayed the foreclosure proceeding with ,a temporary
injunction against Schuholf in -which the Court has granted
us a limited amount of time to parcel off the 20.93 acres
we paid foi. We thex�;sfore need your assistance in parcel-
ing off the 20..93 acres to satisfy the court's directive
in a timely' manner
You will note that the parcel has somewhat of an odd shape.
The reasons the parcel is odd shaped, include allowing for
proper street patterns considering the parcels"topography
and to-include the water facility site at the requisite
elevation. _
2. PUBLIC ACCESS
The parcel will have public access when Tract Map No. 10214
records by means of Skyline Road. If thi4s proposed Parcel
Map is ready for recordation before the Tract Map records
an offer of dedication can be granted to the city by separate
instrument along proposed Skyline Road from Almond
3. HOW WILL THIS PROPOSED P1�RCEL FIT WITFT FUTURE DEELOi�ME14TS
Linville 'Civil Engineers has prepared a concept layout of
the entire area along with a Tentative''Tract Map of the
Parcel of which the City Planning Department has copies.
These- layouts indicate that in nO way =Will the Creation of
this parcel result in any future developments.
4.. EARTHQUAKE
Linville Civil Enginee,:s has indicated on the revised
tentative- parcel,map�an area at the north portion being
a non-buildable.-strip subject to a geological study.
This strip is due to a previous geological report which
isnzli�a _tes- tha_t__ther,e__mav na
_ —_ — - - - -_ r — �cccix-c— x7.Z3G- 3- IT— 'CY1�.5
T area. ilntil such time as a tentative tract map is officially
-filed ti,Ith your City, this land will remain vacant.
Barrye, because of the time constraints imposed \�by the court, it
e extremely important that we process this map as.soon as possible.
We wov;cd certainly appreciate your assistance in this regard,
ii
k Sincej�,Tiy,
6es P. rev
LPresident
xi
{{ CO\/i Grciirs "& CROWE G�j�`'\
F W-1 ice O. COVINOTON k. 1 ATTOjiNEVS 41T LAW
YAW- . .RSRD A. eA1WN +3� � � Mt WEST SIXTH 'STREET TELCPNONC"
�( // SAMUEL CROWS
/ {x POST OFFICE 60k 48t3 `- L-
/ OEOROE W, PORTER -� <•r,/yCLL`�,Ir -
ROeEat,E. OOATCA` Y IJ ONTARIO. CALIFOIRNIA 95762. `7
DONALD O, HASL M y
tt ROBERT k SCHAUER
f EDWARD A. HOPSON
J ANTHONY SMITH -- .April 8, 1985, +rt
STEPHEN R. WADE {
JETTY•; R. ANDERSON. t..
AUDREY A. PEAR. p 44 �eC2
RANOALL j. PITRE w
"I:TER M, HARMACk !
LESLIE D, ADMIRE.
ALCKJOVANOVICH"
uowlncD Acsa + +> 1 f -
OHTAw1O. C1NwaN
Mr. Rick Gomez
City of Rancho 'xcamonga
P.O*, Bq $Q I V
a Ranehor°,; 9amonIA, California 91730
Rea :Tentative Parcel Map 19084 �
Forecast Mortgage /Schulhof; !j
Dear Rick: v
_ Hearings are jontinuing On the parties' battle
over whether or not Sebulhof 1 s %`o- eclosure shbttld'be post-
poned until 'the wit com fetes the a
lT p pprova�. pio ,es;s on
the 2 -lot parcel map. .alt 'the hearing o4 April 5, 1985,
Judge Ziebarth•of the Superior Court ekpressed his, concern
regarding the time that had passedc The injunction to stop
the foreclosure until the- parcelling has bed%t completed
was postponed until May 13,,19ES Judge Ziebarth is having
increasing cdiffictzlty trying to 10 what is fain to both
,'` parties and e 1
P xprassed concern �:at all parties hands were ,
tied until the City of Rancho .;ucamonga could c�aglete the +
Parcelling process.
Given the Jiidgels remarks
15
+- � •" aLi+.c., cLV wnu.l a— cr_..:, i..�— .fur " "� u�pport in moving the
ang on the matter, currently set ar the Planning
Commission I s , a ends forMay 22, to the Planning Commission
agenda for May S. Into one knows better than i how gongiested
the Planning Commission's agendas can get. On the other
hand,,expedited review by the City could solve a lot of
problems and potentially eliminate this:, lawsuit.
\�f
Mr. �4ck Gomez
APri I,8r 1985 'd
Page 1i1 o
Whatever assistance you can give the developer
in an earlier hearing ate would b�,appreciated. If you
need further infornatio, in order'to: expedite ttte hearing,
please feel free to contact me or the`'livil enc. 14, ear.
Res ec u'l�
\.1 Edwar ops ° !
k' C67INGTCN CROWE
EAHxkph
1`
cc: Mr., Lauren Wasserman �1
Forecast Mortgage
w F
f
�t
,J
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG `s
MEMORANDUM
UM
DATE: April 30, 19$5 ,
T0: Barr3� -"" nson, Senior CivtL Engineer
FI ,
FROM.- Rick �GdWe�z, City fPt�nner
BY: Curt Johnston, k�sociate P1 nner
SUBJECT:: EMI,t"1 MAP'
E 50$4 - PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW,
As you are aware, the applicant for Parcel Map 9Oa4, Forecast Mortgage,
requested Planning CAMission Review as soon as possible. Apparently,
the property is in foreclosure and subdivision-'of the 20.9 acres of land
(PM 9084), from a ?larger parcel will resolve pending litigation.
Normally the parcel map would be reviewed by the, pl �`.ing :ommission
concurrently with the corresponding tract map applica, ion (IT 12947).
However,, conriderif4 the unusual circumstances the P�`nning Division
will clear the pard,,n map for Commission review.
Combining the review of different applications for the same p; °oject
generally saves . Commission. and Staff time . and allows ful, analysis of
each phase. The intent is to avoid a situation where a previous
approval creates site planning or other design constraints. In this
case, the proposed parcel boundaries will not si'gnif }cantly inhibit
future subdivision of -the land and developmeoft -a) a priject consistent,
With the design objectives for the property.
Through the E.I.R. and design
g process for Tentative �cact 12376, the
concept of clustered 112 acre lots with open. spat ygreenbet`, was
established as a design solution to preserve the hilfsad8e4 chaerab' ter on
the site_ Ac ynr, tino;�z. the proposed `lot Tines for P,M
the uriginal'boundaries of Tentative Tract 12376. Although TT12376 was
denied by the Planning Commission last January, another tentative tract
application (TT 12947), has been submitted by ForQ'?ast Mortgage. A new
street alignment and lot configuration -is propose'. with TT 12947, but
the boundaries created t;± Parcel Map '9084 will rat adversely affect the
design si,,mce common open space areas buffer the individual lots to -"the
north and west..
Regarding the environmental assessment for the parcel map, the Planning
Division would support a recommendation for issuance of a Negative
Declaration. Two points, however, are not_gWthu-as follows;
a
ti`/� Exhibit VP rc
Ali
. The EIR concluded that the design and intensity of ,
development proposed by Tentative Traces' 12376 and the
\ conceptual master-plan would Gave a s.rbstantiai aesthetic
impact on the, hillside. On the otter hand, the proposed
Rarael map wor�l� not have the same is� act. since only tre
additional residence would be ai7owed thereby preserving
tie hillside character of the aite.
2. The eIR indicated that a fault trade MY "ist'thrgagh
the north side of the P$.tel cap that, a geol ic
study is necessary. A condition of'-a;.provai,'requif}ing
this study ij�\ accord�,te =with the Alquist prinlo ,Act
prior*, to any developm6t or further subdivision; is
recommended to resolve this concern.
The above concerns as .uiell as a number Of other iasue� 'should` be
resolved in the upc oming. months during review of Tentative Tract
U947.. A copy of the latest correspondence to Forecast i~tort`� ge is
aetached for your review-
Conside.r%ng'these circumstances, including he an oin
lftigat on,L the
Planning Division -Will - concur with scheduling g eduling the parcel maPifor
Planning commission reoj4 at discretion.
o �
.l
4.5 CJ: cv
LI
�t
1
S ,
�43b4�._���9.we'.0 Y: aL: .✓.�. fv. ?'aaf'".11.e �4. \\ ,,. �4 _�.`. '4^ �` �_
�- ENS. I4r�;NTAL R��'IE�1•
fJ O \i APPIL,!,'�PMON
f= z
U 1977 ' IMMA_ , STUDY - FART I
GENERAL '}
ror all projeo�s requiring. env €;_ntut ntal review, t;fis form mint be completed
and submitted _Ea the Qevelopment Review,Committee through the €4partment where
the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the
Planning Division szaff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study and make
recommendations to Planning Commission. The Planning Commission will make one
of three determinations: - (Ij The, 'project will have no signific,
environmental impact and '•a Negative 'Declaration will be, filed, j2} The'
project will have a sign•ificant'- environmental impact and an Environmental
Impact Report will be propared, or t.3) An additional information report
should be supplied by the applicant •gi(ing further information concerning the
pro�.osed project.
Date Filed: off %85
Project Title; P.M. 9084
Applicant's Name, Address,,Telephone: Forecast Mortue Coraoration
9333 Baseline Rd., Ste.` 290, Rancho 'Cucamonaa,- 'CA 91730 t714t X3$7_7788
Name, Address, Telephone of Person To Be Contacted
Concerning this Project, 'j!im.Previti c/o Forecast Mortgage Corporation
_ 9333 Baseline Rd., Ste. 990, Rap -o Cucamonga:, CA 917x0 (714) 987 -7788'
Location of iroject: N'i- of—Almond at Big Tree Road.
No _of T.T.M. 10210.
Assessor's Parcel No: r 2005] -0
O
List other permits necessary from local, regional, state and feeeral agencie,c
and the agency issuing such permits:
Rnvernment ForeStry Service
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Proposed use or proposed project:. To split of Parcel t for 1.6 lot Custom
Residential- Subdivision (T;T.M'. No. 12947)
Acreage of project area and square foot',ge of existing and proposed buildings, `
if any: 20.9 AC - Vacant
' J
r,
Describe the environmental setting of the project site including informatibri .
on topography, soil stability, plains (trees), land animals, any cultural,
historical or scenic aspects, land use of surrounding �Jlximately operties, and the
description of any existing structures and their ,`us(attach necessary
sheetsJ: Th existing terrain slopes southerly at ap
13 %. f r`
See E. R. filed and accepted by City for detailed description.
C'
1\
Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of c Mlative ti !
actions, which although Uf ividually small, may as a whole have significant
environmental impact ScCTJ.M. No. 12947 filed or, 2/1/85.
=:J
7. Estzma,'J the am' unt 'or sewage.and sa7iii waste materials this pro ect'
l will generate d ly _, N jj� -Oofor fonst. - See T.T.M. No. 1294 j
I
8. Estimate the nwyv6�r o•r auto aid truck 'trips generated daily by this
Project.* WA
grading trzt
g. Estimate the amount or grading �ing and filling) required for this
project, in cubic yards.
k 10. If the project it volvl�s 16ie coostrucii t of ,,residential n�;;ts, complete
the fom on the next page. , <,. �
CERTIFICATION: I hereby cet�tify that the statements furnished above and in
the attached exhibits present the-data A,% il.~formation required > far this
init a- 'evaluation to the best of my abi stir,,; anti that -the facts, statements,
r, and information ¢reSeated are true attd correct^ to the hest of my knowledge and
belief. I fu,pther understand that additional information may be required to
be subca -: A before art adequate evaluation 'tan be made by the Planning
Division. {
Rate: �6 ti5 Signature
tle '''f ineer
to
M 4_
WILL THIS PROJECT
YES
NO
I. Create a substantial change in ground =�ntours? `t`.t
��
X
2. Create a substantial change, in existing noise,off roduce ' '
a'
vibration or glare?
X a
!'
-3. Create a substantial ithange in demkd for mwticipaT
f:
services `(police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)?
f
X
4. Create changi�s`in the oXisting toning or General
Plan designations?
X .
f
S. = Remove any existing Vies? How many?
6. C_�ate '�he nzed for use or disposal of potentially
ha�•ardol s materials stic- as-toxic substances,
flammables
or explosi0ee'
Explan:iian of Pny 1E_ i above (at`taCit additional sheets if necessary };
7. Estzma,'J the am' unt 'or sewage.and sa7iii waste materials this pro ect'
l will generate d ly _, N jj� -Oofor fonst. - See T.T.M. No. 1294 j
I
8. Estimate the nwyv6�r o•r auto aid truck 'trips generated daily by this
Project.* WA
grading trzt
g. Estimate the amount or grading �ing and filling) required for this
project, in cubic yards.
k 10. If the project it volvl�s 16ie coostrucii t of ,,residential n�;;ts, complete
the fom on the next page. , <,. �
CERTIFICATION: I hereby cet�tify that the statements furnished above and in
the attached exhibits present the-data A,% il.~formation required > far this
init a- 'evaluation to the best of my abi stir,,; anti that -the facts, statements,
r, and information ¢reSeated are true attd correct^ to the hest of my knowledge and
belief. I fu,pther understand that additional information may be required to
be subca -: A before art adequate evaluation 'tan be made by the Planning
Division. {
Rate: �6 ti5 Signature
tle '''f ineer
to
M 4_
C'
REsIC, &Nl & e NS "4j dctlbN
the' folloVing: information shock be prcivided to 'the tYty or Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Oivisigxt in Orden- to aid the school district_ in assessing�� their
ubil,sty °to accoi!,�fiodate the propose' yre ideretial de la merit. Re�telope�s are
required to '
Name of Oeuetn � r.� aqd ,Tentative Tragt No. See • i.T.M. i#o ' x' 2947
.Sgecific U t iC�gn of Project:
PHASE I PHr,SE 2 PHASE, 3 PHASE, 4 j OTAL
1. Nwmver of sij4? Is —
r f
��
L. 'orFmber oi" multjp3e
y
�• _Rate proposed to y
�s
begin cras'ruationc j
j
4. Fa tliest { eta of
Occupancy 1
1
Model
RESOLUTiON'J40,
A RESOLUTION ,OF 'eAE PLANNIrl COMMISSION OF fTH`E TY OF
RAPOPO CUCAMOJAGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER
9084:31E4TAT?VE PAPCEL JMAP''N'0. 9084), LOCATED NORTH OF
ALMtJr1 STREET, WEST`r-T BI TREE ROAD
� - .
- WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel i9Op Number 9084, submitted by` Forecast
(Mortgage Cbrorrat7br. and., consisting of 1 parcel, located. north of Almond
Street, west or B;9.1ree Road, being a division of a portion of the southeast
1`4 of Section 17, tuwnshi� 1 North Runge 7 West. San Bernardino Book and
%s Maps in the County of San Bernardiros,State of California; and
�f a
WHEREAS: ion February 3., "1985,_,a formal application was "submitted
requesting review of;the aboue- described Tentative Map; -and
k.�
WHEREAS, on± May '9, 1985,. , titre ., Planning Cnmmisaion ld: a duly
advertised public hearingar,3he above- described dap.
l +vW iFyERUORtit E. RANCHO CUCAN[ONGN OLANING'COMMIS910,1 RESOLVED AS
FOLLOWS:
-
' SECTION 1: Tkit the following findings--Ih ve been made:
1. That' the msp is,,consistent with_ -the 'general Plan; {`
,. 2.
That the improvement of the ed subdivision ,s
consistent With the Generalr* w ;
That the site is
-physitr suitable for the
proposed development.
4. That the p,r'op.sed subdivision anti intprovemepts- will
not cause --3u52etantial en.kironmental, &zaga, public
henTtk problems,'-or have adve;•se affkts .gin abutting;
SKTIOF -: T_ •his project will lot create significant adverse
e►;virormental impacts Negative Declaration's is issued on May 8, 3.385. -
SECTION 3. Tiiat 're: Ve Parcel Map k, 9084 _is approyed�subjefVto Q
a,n reY:'^_.T:Fn nL�itivn5 of Approva t ,pEt'ta�ning therati4. _ ' _— — — ==
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 1ST DAY OF MAY, 1985,
�1 w
' PLAN41NG CuiVISSM OF T;i5 QTl: OF RANCHD�CUC1 uNG1t l\
ha.�. man
XL
�. I x .,_
-� r
rt.
Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary-
I, Rick �onez, Deputy Secretary of the° Planning Commission pf" th tCit�o,
Rancho Cu�;,onga, do.herQby certify that "the foregoing Resolution E' dufy and
regularly introd' voed, passed ,and adopteq�by, ,the Planning CQmsis> ioit of th
City of Rancho tcamo gaI" at a regular. mefL '3 of;• the Plamning Cb ission. held
on the 2st day of May, 2985, by the fcl1owingj�Vote -to -wide
AYES: - C01 "CIS IflNE& �`5 ,
NOES: COW ISSI9
ABSENT: SowaSSIO(�,���`'..
nl
\ u
t
�
I/ ,J
.0
�V i]�� RANCHO
,C CJCAMONGA
RE SIDED CO��DITIO, OF % PPROVAL- 0 -
LOCATION: North of Aimo:ld Ave West of TENTATIVE PARCEL
6i u Tree Road 4' r
CA, _,E Fj�ED:Februarry_, >Z--1985
�. r
y� LEGAL DESCRIPTION. Beira a division of z NUMBER ffw J LOTS: 1 & Rem ,,Parcel
i portion of the S.E. 1/h of Section 17 T."I.N GROSS ACREAGE: 53,58 Remain=
Flan a 7 West '`San Bern rd%no, �ook of eta s, _ rl St; 50R ijtCEL ta0:
in the County of San Bernardino, fate of CA"
* irxtiHr�t, F* st�Y�kk* �y�c: ��y�. antt** �k�i* �F��*, �xt�; cxrdc��+ tiF�t* ir; Er�srick **kt�r�k�- t *�t�itk�r�l ;
'.
DEVELOPER OWNER Q _ ENDTUETAJSI1RVEi(SiR
i Forecast Mortgage Coa SAME Linville Ciyis7Eilineers
`\
9333 Baseline Rd Ste aD 9333 Baseline Rd. ,St. :19[�
Rncho Cuca.. CA 91730 RnGho Cuca., CA 91730
Improvement and dedication requirements ;in accotda0e .wit -p Title 16 of the
1 4unicipal Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga include, °Fiat °inay not
e`� tic�ited
to, th�=iollowing:
�-% A, Dedications and Vehicular Access
I.' Dedications s!z4'r'1 be made fi_all interior street rights -of -way
and.all nicessary easements a� ~shown on the tentative,,_map.
2. Oedicatior.,shall ba, made of the fol:owin� rights -of-way on the
following streets: <n�
-
_ ,,,_additional feet on
additional feet on
__�I_additional feet on
3. Corner pro ak �lsna �3d . �.. __
_. — _ .A? - u� r Utreo per y
- - Standards
n, n __
' 4. All i ights of vehicular ingress and egress shall be ..dedicated to 4,"
- as follows:
5. Reciorecal access, easements and maintenance agree .mwts- ensuring
access do al?., parcels and joint maintenance of all common
roads, drives. or parking areas shall be provided by C C " &Rs
and shall be recorded concurrent wth the map.
��Tr
it ` G •-
6. All existing easements Tying within futuA; 49,ht -of -way are to,o
�} be goItclaimed or delineated ,=_ the" map_ per ' Engine6r s-
a
re.,`�uirements,.
I. 4,asements for sidewalzi�for public use shall be dedicated to the
City where sidewalks mdhnder thizaugh private prup�rty. S
B. Surety
X 1 "Surety shall be po , ed and an agreement executed tb, thi
satisfaction o of -t City Engineer and Cit1r1 Attorney,
guaranteeing complet Orr cf the public; 'improvemanu ; prior - hto
` recording for access a Parcel land rerttaan der, '- garGeT`,.
2. Alien agreement must be executed prior to recording of the map
` for;yhe following:
3., Surety shall be posted and an agreaent execgted,- guaranteeing
completiun:of all on -site, drainage facilites, necessary for
dewatering all parcels is the, sa sfaction of the t3rilding '=and
Safely Divitan prior to recording far
and/or 'prior tq issuance of building permit for
C. Street Improvements ;r
Pursuant to the City; of Ranch Cu9monga'_Murticipal' Code, Title 16, Section,
16.36.120„ the subdivider may enter ipta an agreement and post ,security
with the City guaranteeing the required constrsict on pri6P to recordation
of the map and /or building permit 'issuance.
-•_ _. 1. Construct full street improvements including., but not limited
to, curb and gutter, A.C, pavement, sid64alk, drive approaches,
parkway trees and street lights on alT,ipterior streets.
X 2. A minimum of 26 -foot wide pavement. within a 40 -foot wide
dedicated right -of -way shall be constructed for access to
Parcel 1 and remainder parc,Ql.
3. Construct the following missing improvemen
Prior to ,recordation for
Prior to building - permit issuance fnr
Curb & A.C. Side - Orive Street Street A.C. Medaatr
Street Name Gutter Pvmt. Walk Appr; Trees. Lights Qverlat� Islands tither
*Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter Ja
4.
4. Prior to any work biing, performed in:the pu'�lic' right- of- Iway,,
fees shad' ue, paid and an nncf°oaehment ; termit hall be obtaic ed
`-from the Ci4 Engineer's Wfice, ir• addition to a _. ny other
permits re4urFJ. >,
X 5.. Stf, ,improvement pla" shall be prepa`real.Vby a Registered ' �
Ci¢,Engineer and approved ,by the City cng -sneer prior _i4
iss ')l!te of� an tn;Crdachmeat permit. Y-
6. Dever per shall coordinate, and, whlere', necessary, pay for toe �
.' rela etion of any, ;dower pales or other existing public
utilities as necessary.
7. Existing.,lInes of I &V or less :fronting tfo propert�t''shall be
�. undegra �cided. t"
4. 1ns6IT Appropriate straet n Aft— pigns,'�_ raffic control,srigg a
striping and Markings +A;tn lac.4 amid ty ps approved by the
City_i ngineer. _ rl
9.' Street light ..locations, as required, a�^e 5e. approved by the
�t Southern California Edison .Company and the' City of-. Rancho
Cucamonga Lights shall be on decarati-vo poles with
underground service.
10. Landscn a and irrigation plans shall wbe i ubrai ec° to and
apprav6d by the Planning 0iviz on rior tai 4h�'f Issuance of
building permit... p
31. Concentrated „, flows -shall
not crosssidew,alks�.
Undersidewalk drains shall” «e installed &'tb dty 5tunu�ard5,
_ ti ry'�
tI. br�inage and Flood Control
3. . ?rivane dra pag aiiments fits c `iiss -lot Arainage `tali be
required and, hall be delineated' ar noticed'the final map.
2. Adequate x�rovisions s�,aVl be made for acceptance and disposal
of drainage en t,�.}ing the property from, adjacent areas.
3. The fallowing storm drain shall be Installed _ to "tile
satisfaction of the City Engineer
4. r Prior to recordation ; of the map, a aydrolazgit and drainage
z .study far the pro; ec'e�,�hal i be submitted to e City" Engineer
for review.
5. A drainage detention basin per City Standg ,;sfalI, be
constructed to detain increased runoff _
P
L . Gract'if- of the - subject prAperty shal'.1 be in accordance with, th�--
uniform .Building Code, - City Grading Standariis anti. ,accepted
grading practices. The final grading r
x•,�, 9 ��P�an sha��� be "ii
substantial carformance with the approved conceptuaV, gra4 ng-
plan. `�i
2. A soils report shall, 6o'` prepared by a qual;fied engineer
licensed by the State of California to perform such- ;work prior
to 'issuance, of building permit
r
3- . ` A 'geological report shall -be prepare} 6.d' a qual,ifled engineer
or geologist and.. submitted at the tim( •of application 3r
grading plan check..
4. The final grading'-plan shall be ubject, to review ,and f pproval
by the Grading tlommittee and shall `be completed prior 1:
recordation; of the final sobdivisien map =.6r issuance of
S building permit 'whichever comps first.
final CAding. plans fn each par cal, are to be,submitted_to the
Building and Safety' Division for approval, pr,- or to issik-4nce :. of
uldirtq permit,
F. General Requarenents and Approva�j r
_x h.; Permi-Ls from other'ag�lcios will 'be required as follows-.
;6&rans for
San. Bernardino Gauri'4y F o�it control Bistrtec a, �.
Cucamonga County Water "i;strict for sewer and watar
San Bernardino County Dusi JAIatwnent (required` prior to
issuance of`a grading pet'mit)
k ,
Other,
2. A copy of tha'"Covenapts, Conditions,Ad Restr'icti.ons (C.C.&R.$)
-
approve! by the City Attorney t required prior to recordation
tt of the map. r > r
X Provide `11.i ut�?4s sGry }ces0 each 1atT '�ng
includ sewerage, i< - -- mater-,-- eNctrlc .power, -gas and telephone prior to street 1
constructoiz»
\A
4. \'Sanitary seweri, and xtater'systams shell bF dasi %fined to Cucamonga
i(ounty Water District-istat!dards A letter, of acceptant,
��equirda
Y. This `subdivision shall be' subject to conditions Of ap�srioval'
from CalTrans /S n Bernardino,rflu�ty.Flaod Costt�ol U %tr1&�
X 6. Approvals have not beer' secured from all ut l its es ;`end bi er
interested agencies involved. Approval of t a
he fin -I g t I i !
be °ub3cL in any requirements that may be receivefporiem
r
-� q }N
-4 -' "'�',,�
�,�,
i iprx'• . '' �'a,Ty.,r` "�'� r r�` t9r ' '> .�, ^ -s3* + � ?;r his
t ' °t
X 7. the, Ming` of � the tentati�re map ni approYa7 "ir same doest A '
n guaraftie that sewer treatment capacity will `be avajTau, 3
the t4me, -building permits rmits are requested, When _ buildi - »" :V-S . �.
are- requested, thel- Cucamonga County ,Water D'str'i`�c�wiT� 4
R asked -to certify the availability o- rcapacity. Permits Wfi
not belvisued unless W14, certification is recp�ye'd it�,:Writ°as �
- 8, , locat and Master Planned-Trails sball be provided io atccar-dance
wIth the Trail Pjan, A detailed' trail plan indicaflih e,dd'ths,
maximum •drones, physical conditibms, fencing VAd weed; control,
in accordance with City tity°.• ail stM&rds, shall be bmi`tted to "'
and approved by,. the C Plioner .`=prior _ to -k I rdatfoa
an ding periit for a
r issuance or" 4
Prior to cording a dep, smell be. steel ),o th the 'City t3
'. cowering .they astimated Chat of appmrtvoyp , the sments �
under Asse0mi t istrict',82_i among M new°�y createt�rcels
•" X 20. Ai the time of �i`-�al map submittal, the following :shall.beY z
r submittedk Titl����22eoort, traverse calc�ilations. ;.(sheetsi,',
` copies of" ,recorded n \ps °--and deeds used as. reference ;h /16x^
showing original lant \divi §ion, tie votes ,;end bench ":narks
referenced: 4
G. SR clal Conditions
1 •A Geological'Study sha11 be cqj I'te �(lnd approved k1or to the
issuance of 'building, permits or thl approiai of any further
t proposed dee"fopment within oe1
-n Ta' or the remainder parcel, w
and a dote to this effect shall be Rf'accd upon t6.e Final Parcel
Map. J,
X 2. Dedicated access to both Parcel Z and `the.;:ramainder parcel
shall be provided Rrior to tbO. recordationlo�'the Final 'Parcel
G ;:tap. q i
4 X 3,: A blanket easement nven, C ,'rel -1 itl fi ivor of the "rem3A#der „
parcel, for the iuture bed4cation an4l4provement of a pu ��p�ti•
s> stmt, on am p aligntrer � �establIs, d h , �c,r� approved master pt4G
for either parccet shall}�ae plotsided iridriva Yect,rda on of tl� if i
F r
L'ITI• QF RR,MCHC gj,QW G
r - X r
•tip
� v e t
it ce"^
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON GA � o
MEMORANDUM
o d
F Q z
_ DATE: May 8, 1985 1477
TO: Chairman and Members of t Y' nning -"ommission ys =
r
FROM: Rink cromez", Ctty'..-lannera
BY Howard Fields, Assistan PI nner
SUBJECT, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSME4T P.NO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -16
- ASSURED' 'MIN - ORAG' - instruction of a mini-storage
-development, with caretaker's quarters, totaling 32,850
square -feet on 1.44 acres of I &nd in the. Industrial Park
(Subarea 6) District located -on the north side of 4th
Street, east of Turne Avenue APN 214- 3 71 -03.
VARIANCE 84 -Oa - ASSURED IVIN- 14TORAGE A request to - alloy(;
a "reduction in the requiredl:1'5% minimum landscape coveraV. {
in order to construct a mini- storage facility on the north
side of 4th Street, east of Turner Avenue, in Subarea 6,
Indusif ?ial Park designation - APN 220 -371 0
AT
As the Commission is well aware, these items have been continued from
tie March 13, 1985 'Planexing -Commission _meeting to allow the applicant,
Assured Mini - Storage,,, the opportunity to coordinate their development
proposal with the westerly adjace5 -' property owner, Mm; Alan Tibbets. A
meeting was held with both of rties- t the - ,Planning Division. ,puring the
discussion of ,alternatives, it;,became appArent that no coordifration was.
possibi'c, since both propertwn3rs had development pr4osais.• on
�
j_5
different time frames. ° Consequently; no workable solution was reached
other than agreeing to a shared driveway approach. The applicant has_ - evised his development submittal to meet alt deve?opment requirements° +�
For Subarea 6 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and,•provided a- :shared 10
driveway,
Tree associated Variance�84 -0 is no longer required based upon this
revised su6mittai. f Fk'rther, the applicant has eliminated the
caretaker's quarters, f;�l changing the appl icat�bn to a /, Cevelopment
Review.
1 -�
RECOMMENDATION: Theref�e, because th(� two atc4ns were continued, the
Punning, Curimission must pen the publ�� hea ing; 'ask the applicant W
withdraw Variance 84 -OZ and CUP 84 -16. Please refer to the staff rhport
for Development Review D 855-15 that,addresse5 the revised, roacct
submittal.
ITEMS L'& M
A' � ��;
.I�0,
Cix'Y%)7UNCkl.1:'r CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
Ori 1
L 8
Mn
1,0
RATE: May 8, 1985
TO. Cl Airman and Members of , ning Commission <
e. FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY Howard L ". Melds, ,Assi ant lagaer
;SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMSO 0 . DEVELOpMENT RpVEH 135 -15 -
V _ U11:1 11 NI-- TORAQE Constructi' of a -5-40 -storage
y e°v�pment totaling ,112.square. Feet on 1.44 ae,eS of
^��in the Industria Park (Subarea b) District 'located r
on thk, north side of 4th Street, east of Tutner Avenue,-
APN glo- 371 -03r "t
The 4pplicapt!s revisy4'yradingl,�lan for DR $5-15 (formerly CUP 84 -16),
was takeii `fore the Grading Committee 'for review and conceptual
approval. U;iiirtunat4ly, the grading plan must be revised to meet City
Codes and Standards. Therefore. the Ttiommittee > oul.d not approve the
conceptual grading plan; ,primarily because -of drainage problems aT,ong..,
the westerly boundary that '-`wi1T also adversely effect landscaping There
Staff respectfully requests A con +,,11. once on this item, in ,order to
resolve grading/drainage issues final determinatlon : by the
Planning Commission,
j
RG:Hp:cv - -
0
}
_'r \ ,
ITEM it,
R
.. .',
CITY O>± riMCHO 6&MMOn 6&
STAFF REPORT
V' a
DATE: May 89 1985 1� 1977
TO Che -rman and Members of the Planning'Comnission
FROM: Rick Gomez,, City Planner
f BY: Otto 1fZdeiT, Senior Planner,
r
SUBJECT: LAND USE RECOMMENDATIONS EBY THE CITIZENB w1 V s R
ota'ION U u
I. ABSTRACT:, This repert outlines CAC recommendations on General Plan`
Density reductions, and notes the implications, It also provides
policy, options to be considered by the Commission.' Staff is
iato to policy dir for recammen City
Counci'ill.
d II. BACKGROUND: At a;recent Citizens Advisory'C"omnii,s on meting, -.a
resolution was passed recommending to the„ `City Vdunci7 a
reconsideration of the residential categories in the,City's General
Plan. Fhe< CAC Resolution, attached to this report as Exhibit #V% .
recommends":ubstdntial across the board- rediacticns\in densities ;~r
all residential 1,and use categories fiom Low Medium a'ghigher.
Specific CAC recommendations are a)ted below:
Land Use,Cate or Existing Proposed
L 2-4 No Chang
IM 4 -g 5_6
M 8_14 7-9
MH =24 10 -13
( H 24 -30 '* 14 -18
Ir iddition, the CAC re&� nded that for, densities above 29 _ its.:_:
- —
'r 'tile �!;re, -a categ3ry (representing intense development),
:.a created. This category::Wgld be paymitted on no more than one-
tenth' of a percent (.1%) of the residentially zoned land in the
City and would be controlled by a Conditional Use Penait process,
which would demand 'lamelior�at%i of" all effects of high density to
a degree that they tave 'no greater impact on the resourdes and
adverse affects of crowding tan mould one dwelling unit per acre -.
The reasons'�-'for this recommendation by the CAC are also UAted i-A
i� the resolution (please see resolution for specific texts Thejr
N
be summarized as follows;; _ '
ITER
PLANNING COMAZtON STAFF REPORT
CP^ Lana iJse 0,4, os ndat, #ns
May 8, 1985
i� Pd g O G 1 L✓
0
„ _.
Jl \�J
1. Desire to maintaiu a rural env.*onment in the City;
2* Construction of large anounts of high density -:
z projects in the past;- G
U 3 Numbeir, of high densi ';; )projects already <approvedl �}
4. Too many such high °densit;''projects "are �consistent
with the wishes of the residenis of the Cliy.
The City Council` has briefly considered the CAC resolution ""'and
referred the item . �_ of Mann n`g Gom tssi°on for review and
l.; recommendation, on t0 genera: 'directio ? the City Council should
i
take on his matte rhe iterkis scheduled for Council review
(basic policy isw,As only) at \ he May 1a, 198 City Council
meeting. \,
f.5 - he recommendations mach Eby9e LAI have"" fa ' e:hing
/'implications affecting just about all deveiopmentla areas
under the ,City's jurisdiction. .V ption of the CAC re; ations i
as j�
City's Genet General and City regulatory,. necessitate srachanges ing public
policy. To implement the recommendations, the f �lowing`lalans and 1
documents would require modification:
I
General 'Plata Revisions to several mandated elements of the
—� enera 'fan wnuld- - -be required, including land us;, circulation,
housing, public safety, and recreation, to correct an imbalance j
between housing and commerciallindustrial uses, to reassess demand
for Infrastructke, modify service provisions, etc. 1, The changes
,would be required to provide internal 'consistency among all
mandated ; General Plan dlei�ents. Thin would be a major effoit
involving substantial ikaurc?s.
Zoning (DeVele moent D3.strirtl _4* eslgrtiai ions
wn" 'or vrnrr -the General 'Ilan Ulan o assure _balance among General
Plan and zoning cateories. :
Development Code: Restructure and °� modify most` rasidential K
categories to assure conc�istency with General Playa. Nlodif� `
specific development standards to be ° ref lective of-).,new density
ranges. Develop criteria for "1" designation as recomimrded- by
M. _ )
4
_ Der'
PLANNING COW—MAc� �tCPEkRi � \ i
CAC Land (�Use Recertdations
May 8, i9s,5
Page 3 Y
„
,
t
planned Co nua 'iiatt cific Flans: the City';{ General Plan also 1
co �o s err*-yfsta,,,° Victoria, an Cary V'JaAed nnwnit1es, -$n l
addditic to the it kda Specific ` Piatr: Ali _ /these areas <rre %ot
ot�,rerne br ( D," YQ o ,went Code, bud - vve their own text deY�
' �: deal with s a i.-t ii, irrumst es To c
�. r�-� p cslitate" {:fie `htatter�. ,
City also has die;eloprr+ent '; agrez�ten with' the bui l ders of 1`efr � �
Vista and,.Car�p�Planoed C hities, wAi4 sh legally bind the Mi to �
long -tic Tare use eommitments. :;The ity' substantial fj,.a gal
i
stake in tbii Victoria Ategion ;' Cdr =also plit4tes any
-`, Potential re.vi si.ons- wh110 night result in s �� antiat density
dece'ease�,.,fr 'iih'e Vitoria P lapped GoaanceNiiy.
t i
Other Issues r In addition to the regulatory documents, 'ity
`
would need to reassess Sts capital Pgmprovetaent program: $parks'
program er;d long lterm planning for�,mejor facilities ? §eciai u
distr,.icts priWiding;servirds in the City would also be affected
their long- range planningi,and implementatioo.
All thii"ae changes,;;4141qui!^ a coordinated effort'on the pa '';of
` the City's various dep`�tmenus and special dfstricts.
Should the 1�lanni Cc ipsian c har with thh �r ': ndaiior of
the CAC, ,'Staff will propare a '+detailE2 ;;work pr am to ideal
effectively with -A11 the necessary changes -and, will incorporat ^;
these„,, changes 'into. Fiscal 35 -86 program year for City Councii
review..;, , t
IV. POLIO'; TPltNAIEVES,_ should the Commission c ncur with some of thy: --
goa s"'tncpresse y 'the Advisory Commission but fund itoeW
reluctant to attewpt, a wholes —le revision of the City's General —
Plan and felxted documents, other policy option, could
considered. These options could result in an overall redaction i;n
density with particular er�has s an /hasp area�r the C mission
night consider MrOpriate.
Ti e first yestian. that roust be answered is whether or riot whatever, ` \-
density rnuuctiells take place shou'14 occur citywide, than affecting
the GeneraT4Plan,, or outside of the planned co nuuitie�n,y-
in the area governed by the Zlwdlop"Mnt Code). S�f will nletf
specific direction —,-A this area, as- _,`ell as feedback ,_the
following options/ „ s
All, 11
fi
Y�
�iS.i M �r i tit
4
x
r
A
�dnii, ie#Gbx� • . r ry I 1 � 5�.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF RCP'RT < y I
CAC Land.Use Recomnendatibns
May B, 196'5
Page 4
tion A-. e�-vtion in S ecific Land Use 'ateaories Only
mss' . . L
This wqu Involve review o indiVMai mouse categories ,f ^r
possible modifications. "Since a specific aria of concern to%`the
CAC are densities-, a p
on 1Y du /ac, the Cokimission may wish to
consider madifying tfte ';V and H_ categories as follows;
uesioaation., xi_stin4 pro used
MH 4- 24 -du/ac -19 Ou /ac
Densities, above 19 du /ac
permitted with specifft
<' findings only (CUP ?)
H J -30 du /ac 24 -27 du /ac
Densities above 27 du /ac
permitted with specific ,
findings
i
These modifications w`o!jld result in narrowti.ig the density range
spread in the higher density categories. Further, the City would
be in a osition to require that the adverse ai "fects of high-
density 6e ameliorated through the applicatian of specific`
mandatory findings.
H
Staff will need specific dir-rcVPn. as to whether this approacl�, is
appropriate fnd if so, which" use categories are to, be
considered firs' m s ioi�
Ci
_Option B - ReductvJn in Site -Specific lireas "nly
other May of accomplishing, ancove� raja -decrease in donsity would
be to re"ssess the density designations fpr all vacant residential
land not y 'et approved For c�!velopment:\ This would involve--.-.,-,
site -by -site .revietic of :upper density designations in various
locations. ' The attached Exhibit "B" indicates all such land
outside the planned communities rnrrently designated Medium
Wium -Nigh, and High dens;-t , but not yet approved for development
by the City. lrhe Caarrissj, i may wish to consider a i edesigAation
of some of these., s 1,e4tpecific areas to lower depsity designations.,:
StW will nee4d specific dikzivicn on1.1,;his policy option.
tion C - Combinatiop a, d B �rj
Reduction .n both ci &rs� c3te9000 and
Sxzd- specific locations)
�
This would ,-, involve an "1xs`fi ?ssment ` °'
designations aod site - specific lot *
both land cat
at; e`
a �s
o-P }ion h4s th? , pgtentiale r.g
f overall 4e^.dies
substantially :, wittijut drastic changes
in eit4ar tht= A anti'
prdvisions of the Develbp not Code, iir
wholesale `Site -s eo -1c
�fesigration
changes:
'
;
v
I
.... . ... . ...
07,01-02 o 5-08-85 PC Agenda o 4 of 4
REPO T
CXC LaM f i6
mad/ R, 1.985, If
�age
Staff Will deed direction as ,to -_the° feasibility of tbji; policy
bptiort. tI _
g.
The final policy aflter ive far, consideration is no change. The
E, Comniss#,7 may se- ect 'thns alternativs aif it feels the City's
k' General ` l.ap and U!�,mlapmdnt Cod4 afe, wLAI balanced and tttat- no `+
substantial�changgs are warrantcd.�
r Y. RECOMMENDATIONS Afi�, th %s ,point, staff` ;needs pq-1 icy direction 6'
- only. , Pa icy a ternaijves 4i d options ii t b,l are stated 6etew"
�.
Alternative I.- .Reduce deqsI *y, per PAC rec dations. j sir
Alternative 2 � Reduce dcast y ,t.hraug6:
' Option Reduction',' in spcitic land use categories only; or
t,ptid?s $ M, uption in. site- spec`ivie areas GnlY; or
,,pt Ca CoWinatimn ,oth & b above.
Alternative 3: No change, reounetided `
t it is respectfully reques!,,�`,4t trait :,the Ce mirosion provide staff with
specific policy directiawi 116 •f6rwaHed_to th6,,City Count;
Res ectfull ubm tedF
�..
C11 Site?
ity lane
t �i OK: jr� .er.
}
J � u
'.
irk
x.JL�
77" CITY of RAINCxa CtPAMaNGA
,
^� :NORAND�I
April X10, „1995
\` t , y
Mayor and Members of Cit v�un�u-"
'1 FROM:. Adv ry, Commixssion 4ambers I 1
�gA
��
Boher Xro I�iz2o
Assptanj�ta. City Manages*'`"
z ,
f SUBJECT: 'Land Use tecommeadatibos "1by Advi:soay Commission .
The Advisory Commission; at its �Gh c � 19$5 meting recommended•.
that the following s>t�mation rwa de Ito tie itg couI
and Planning Commissioa for a Ooh
53 dei a on a �a,
The Advisory Commission finds and recommend asnfp]lowsi t�
This City is long desired to maintain a rur- a��'Elivironment to
is maximum extent feas3�bler • '
Thin City has allowed the construction of large amounts of
high density- dwellings during the _15ast two years.
There.Lte many more high density dwelling projects approved or
awaiting aZ roval. .
Toe many high density dwelling projects ara inconsistent with
the wishes of, the citizens 12 this 'Cityy deteriorate our.
resources and producs) *ari u.s CocUsequerices of crowding.
! a 4
` Swift and ce "Baia la'nits mast be placed on the prof,''feratio
of high density, dwelling projects.
Thert'ss -
u --
RESOLVED that the Advisory Commission recommends W the 4
Council and Planning Canmtission that the general plan and
zoning ordinances of this City be amended td effect a mange.
in allowable density ranges along the fallo ' g guidelines,:
Continued.
M.
S
3,
�l r q
3 -
t•
VL F,
VIC
I .,s �,� ]' r� � � .xf �. re •.: T""'YF. ^' l '�"e"- v;yL,a at
VL VL
y �,
fit
i..+ 1� y VL�;�,t`.�J ^'a -•-;�- - ,. f F: "' �' �
�..
tYtt
r�•}I,at , 3•i`i`u`%'
Er
!ti j t"
• - �,
`. 4 o TeHn :ri3rA PLAN I T1 13
.1
: ;1"' �1.•...�, ii v
1i �c��-�ki k•.. �xM
MH r
at ft K — 4 ,.3 `' • v,,- �.�
4 !: � 1 t L . k kSP 2 b f.S. -L •'.=. ,y � ,,, �F �t�
MN 1� i�Yw _3 F.•� k 1 'l
'u rMi.R -n
1 C4.. .. i.. �r�._....7 ..x.i �4 . = sr •- r�tl.u^�'p rte; . — -r�� • t �
k,
1 t
q fi
CITY OF I CRO CLT0.4kJAMTiiU
STAFF REPORT
Adakk
DATE: May 8,' :985 tsn�
T0: Chairm4p and Members of the: Planning C&ffdssion
FROM: Rick Gomez', City Planner
w
ik
Curt.ulah n ston, Associate ,Manner)
SUK-1-CT: REVIEW - bF�E EQUESTRIAN TRAIL REQUIREMENTS FOP, : TENTATIVE
TRACT �?Z - W00f) ND PJ CI�-IC �- custom fat subdivision
„1
WT— lots on 3 Q. a4, 'es of 'hand. in the Verdi Low'
Residential d 'du
Aistri Oos;.? titan �v, /ac), located on the
west side of iiermosa Avenues south. )f Almond Street - APty
201- 0714, 6,'25, 26, 35., and 36. 0
I. BACKGROUND: The Equestrian Advisory Committee reviewed this
project gn two 0;lasions recently and recommended specific
locations for ,comnu-i ty and feeder trails -as discussed below, the
applicant, F�owever, requested Cormnission review and direction of
r
the trails recommendation prior to fu`ti consideration of the Tract
Map. At issue is the requirexient f ;aria Comnunity Trail along Alta
Loma. Creek.
II. TPAILS COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Exhibit "A" shows the Trails
CorMittee recommendation which includes community trails along Alta
L ma Creek and at the north and, south project iioundaries. Local
feeder trails will be located behind lAts off of the three cuil -de- .
sacs.- The Trails 'Comybtttee recommended that 'standard. trail
improvements be waived in favor, of maintaining 'natural contours
With a meandering 10 foot wide trail. Fencing.6m.hoth sides of the
:
community trail should be brown versus. standard white extruded
—TTY
C1 Y7ftt,- fTfT. --7--- - _ - -
The applicant,. Dick Scott of Woodland Pacific, is concerned with
�
the requirement for a trail -tlong the creek and submitted a letter
requesting further revie. of the issue. The key issues discussed
0,
in the letter are outl�`ed in the following sections and staff
analysis is provided.
II. ISSUES /ANALYSIS:
r
A. Duolication of Community ;Trails:, The applicant is concerned
that three north south'- f4itnity trails are proposed within a
distance of 300' to 600t, and the requirement for a trait along=
the creek is excessive.
e h
&x
ITEM P�*:
r
r
(
b
PLANNING CONMIS'SIOR STAFF t(EPQRT
TT 12902 -• Woodland Pacific
- May 8, 1985
Page 2 r
As „shown on the Genera'# Plan 9as4:er Plan of Trails- (Exhibit
"8'°), three community, trails converge near the subject
property. At the top of a,stoop slope along the west boundary.
of Tl 12902 is,a portio-L the east /West Almond trail which
will be installed with 6velopment of tentative Tract 10088
(Exhibit "C "). life g „Jiera” alignment of this trail parallels
Almond Street. �lmonu Street &is not'coniect through TT Io088
so alignment of -the trail Jogs south along`Archibald Avenue,
and then runs along the 'south and .east boundary of TT 10088
back up to ,Almond Street. > An easterly connection .long the
8
boundary' °between TT 100 , and TT 12502 would be Extremely
'drops
difficult considering a steep slope off roughly 40 feet
down: to the creekbW.
East of, "the subject property within Tract 12237 a coMM -anity
j
trail is plan{;ed along Hermosa Avenu=4 This trail, serves 4
1
dual purpose of, providing north /south circulation for residents
` within Tract 12 3i (Exhibit "D ") and.accommodates the cammunityK
- 1
tram on Hermosa Avenue. Although improvement Plans have been
I
approved for a 30 foot wide trail `in,,this location, the
Equestrian Committee stated at their April 10meeting that 3nly
a 12 foot wide community trail would be necessary.
Regard }fig the creek trail in question,. the alignment, parallels
Alta soma Channel to mane use of the drainage right -of -way,
sim7lar to Demens Channel;; or Cicaihonga Creek. The porti6h of
thin trail adjacent to Ti' 12902 will provi , a i_rect link to
the `lmond Trap.
0. Bispt' .s [ots /,iabsTit : The applicant is concerned that
rorsect�n9- s`w�t_ a trail along the creekbed will limit the
�f1f1I , use of the property, create ..$n invasion of privacy, and �► - ^°
increase the liability of future homeowners.
The Equestrian Advisory Committee felt a'` i�
-
-_ _the.creekbed
Development Code requires trail access to the-rear of Bach lot
(Section 17.08.060.E). Since the creekbed is near the base of
the slope and westerly access U not feasible, the required
community trail will function similar to a typical rear lot:
trill. The fences will inhibit entry onto private property,
but gates will be required on both sides of the trail At each
lot to provide east /west access for homeowners,. in �additidns�
the numerous trees on the. property" will buffer the 'homes from
the trail.
}
C. Tree Preservations The applicant is ' concerned tftat
construction of 'traiiU on the property will cause the rekoya�
of hundreds of additional trees. €
" J
= "
;.
1
C
PL�,NNING CQMf1T1!S U IS 7l E, 9PORT:..
�r.
129D ��tb�artd Piftc a
May 8;` 19851
%
Page
`\
A
.The Equestr 4, AM ory Committee shares this cone, -n and.
�#
r
recommen', ed t standard gradtog. ,procedures- wau ct> ngt be
it
necessary ;g that the-tra #is could meander alarig tie creek. ed
and thraulft6q, V-he� pirojeet at a minimum -ltl foci wto.h.
D. E uestriav Il 6s,. -the appitoani stated a;-number of prbspectixe'
'facilitoet
ome buyers do .not' wish. to main�ain egttesjtrian land
that ofily a smali, ercentage of ,the peop3e in the Caty' make use ,r
of the, equestri`aM o rails sysi e .
k
The Development Code prohibits exciudir. the keeping -mf 4orses h'
within new subdivisions in t►ie EqueTSt an Rural re and
requires tab de tapMent; of local •feeder, commupitg;,;and
regional trai ls"
g
IV. REECOMHEOATi TPe Eggestrran Qgmn1ttea recomme d's that a
'
community` trail 6e.required. along * rre�Kbed as -ind 4 ed in. the
'
staffrepai "t Ttte 5houd`l^e,►�ew all` ire%t �d eiemehfs
regarding i be issue artd provid ,the „app operate d x'en l"6h , to Me
applicant- and staff ir_ orer�`o. fin�a! pe pweparation :of stf
reports a prhpriLate con iition'fo is : pro! ect. „
..
r
R submitted; C` e .
r
ick omex '
i
it lann
�.
AG:CJ:ns`
2i rc 5..
Attachments: Exhibit "A" '' Tentative Tract 12902
Exhibi "H" - General .Plan Master Plan of Trails.
Exit #b "C" = Tentative Tract 1008$
Exhibit "D" q Tract 12287, X11..
t
fetter from Applicant
LI.
t •
_
- i# ,
U.
a
f: t
I T7TATIYE 5t
TRACT x2402 r _ d }, L+ ,'•
JL
AE
AWITY
aTY OF ITEM
•. �„�,�,_� az:�ssre:srarmamm t�j( 1t 'die /*
„�•S� —mss in : -xt'�: � .,c. f ' ianiA` •
'3a"' = ��z�rr - ._�-S. ✓yam . � �� � a � V+F
ANCHO' C LICA MONUA TITLE: ;, �.
r
PLANNM DIVISICCi F.�CHi►3I— ,_sC.�LE "°°'� ,§
� i `J
• � �
VC
tu
uj
IL A
eta.
by �cc � 1'- o 0 � � � 5z 0
.. us ac oc w a. w w
LL 20 fE
r 1 Ni Ol I a
Pl
4 a
r a
F
F .p4� aggnddaa4aS+ a¢go4, t. ati .
F
F a
9
f a d¢ l
a � a uputrlt3. i'
• n �� °s �F'` aj
3t r�+.r t, a l 4G•�7, '� 7"'\ M444 MD�M4 C�p141tMOM Y Mp
_ QagaOagk1a44 sq',a��s•1�fi�k� Y{�'Q�iy{�Y�,?�`4'�' MMWwFI� WtltPRUWMw�t
sr, � w �( .p4i.rtbaiq» dta0
( dty +nkm�t�
.. y, t .. ;:�::`- `r_rl.,`?t5'rC•5'( w �i ut � q° e
. .t►� Arww�va�w
i nt w ♦ ..at ti _, .. q
tt p
t 41gft�° +x�om � t �au»9 t
k c da dp ok ; p aoaa ali ! a
! � � a!Y � a o t P1�9N�nt
tpwga+y
MOTO
r.
SR 7 ,,
I d
s -:r
t —z;gl
TI
F.F
IMP
Or-J.
Vil-
47 --I�
ML V
vcmy jw
NOkTW,
d*OXA 'MAI L4
tf
TycF
ftamk--? r 0, �da
- .11 'i 1, , 4
XJ-D (�.,�WGA
M18.
4�
10
-1
PLANNNG L ECHIBIT--- 7'
• L O��rm,� �y �4F
April 19, 1985$��
3
rr �r
Mr. Lauren Wasserman
City onager'
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.Q. Box 807 v
- 9340 B"eline Averr_'�, lunit .A
G Rancho Cucamonga' California 91730
Dear Laurens 1
Re: Property At North End Of HerucvJa Avenue
As 1rou know, we are currently developing tt-L)asterly side oL the above
referenced property, in a. project: ]mown as "'The Iftods "„
TIIis development zes the Subject of numerous c icationsr letters, and
other negotiations, spanning a _,*Vera! year period, the result of which has
been the development which is now underway.
This development, and thq! property on the west-sick- of Hermosa, which we
own, at ` unique ones, wirb the stand of trees. etc. 1�
The r ix
pla... .... r!g'process for. the property on?the +east side :of Hermosa,
currently under developmennt, was accorded top priority by all affected
departments and groups irk an effort to preserve the visuzl and aesthetic"
resources and as many of ;the trees, as possiblei and to-create a natural
setting without extensive on -site grading.
During the planning peoce.5s, we questioned the wisdom in removing literally
hundreds of additional trees, in order to provide a network o€ euuestrian
trails, when, statistically, only a smal.l'fraction of homeowners in the
area north of Banyon have horses, (according to, information furnished to me
by both. city staff ann by Ms. Pam Henry, of the equestrian ccmlttee).
Howevert in effort to resolve all matters ham=niously, we agreed to
installation a4 all of thin trails, including, an extremely expensi(+`
trsilr at the insistence of the project planners immediately adjaq -tb to
Hermosa Av+Onue, on the -ewit side. To install this trail, we had to remove t T
trees to a distance of ap yroximately 303 from the curb_-;jne, and perform ? � `
u �
{. `` 4Y ^3
T9lttYf5TNIN7HSTRfEi r UAG 140.tALIFORN(A51786 7'14- $+16.1802 �r
!'
�Mr. Gauren Wasserman V
April 191 1985
Page 2
exten :ve grading* both elements which we had hoed to avoid in an'` axfort
-
to nmserve. the aestNetics and natural beauty, of the area.
p.
In June of 1984, we began lanzd planning for the property on the west side
of Heawsa, and prepared a number of schematics which seemed to meet the
M` Grit raffia a£ the planning e,?Aff and other affected agpr dies. After a' number
! of meetings, reviews, etc.* we concluded that the design criteria for that
particular parcel was more intensively affected b, i 6ograph cal matters
than the east. side. Significant among the'geogzal,himi matters are the
gradients cif the property, the configuration, aazd the creel: running through
the property which will become a portion of the Alta Loma storm drain
I facilities, for Uhich we have given easeownts ;ko the storm drain district.
Accordinglyg our plans were revised to met tho engineering criteria, and
after several meetings with staff and varictla committees, we appear to have
solved', all :tatters as they relate to the land lse concept,nfiguration
and V.Ad,.ent4 including an agreement to individualize custom type houses on
certain, ,of, thc.��ts, with attractive bridge drivewayss- etc.j
In add tlon, wk agree8/ the City's Consulting geologist reviewing the
S =Iogi;cal and seismii, /data submitted on the property by Richard Mills and
AssociuL!s: !
t
In shptt ony seem t�!/have brought the proposed development to a pcd:nt of-
acceptaaxzz by all �/r icted City departs ents# however, the .sare-sittmtioa is
not trutls with the ('equestrian comnittloeo whom I understand is ,,w appointed
group to ttive advice to the staff, Planning Commissions and, the Council. '
At �r ilu pstion, on Tuesdays T
yo'" 9g� y April 16,' 191�S,r ., met with KJs, pain Henry;
in' atterxl, -Ice was she, Mr. Bruce La Claire* of my officer ?uuti .. I found ,
_ her to be a charming persons who appeared to understand,,our Concerns over
the apparent mandates- of the equestrian coaW ttee, but who reiterated the
committee's position that it would be necessary for there' !,*. bid .three
"north-to-south" equestrian trails within a distance of 30U, to 600?.
In her ;analysis, she projected the opinion thafi singe the genei^al plan of
the City shows an equestrian trail parallel with the creek bed,t that, hhis
exact location is mandated into the General Plan.
Perhaps this is truer however, my untierntanding of the intent of the
general plan, and in the showing of equestrian trails thereon,. is that
certain flexibility be accorded in the exact locations, depending ork such
circumstances as grades, drainage facilities, topographical, and aesthetic
situations.
Frankly, -„1e are at a quandary„ ..I£ the equestrian cemmittee•'s insistence
y
Prevails, we will be forced to remove hundreds of ad#tional trey l asect
A number of lots* with an �SSezent for an equestrian trail, for
approximately 15% of the p9ople in the city, and do it with t 1,. a
that-it
�*
would parallel an additional planned trail located anproxsttra't,
°
1.
100 to 15Q' to ttaa nest. 4
N l9, 1585
z i0e; 3
In b3II- Nictity of�xndivi'dua.1. lots with surali traits :raiser c
aeries liibil t:y, maintenance:, and invasion of pci aaay el ni`s,
Oich do not feel is in ttM best interests af, the rC+spery�tEvnx pu=Ju=ers
of these houses, or the City.
: .;�.�_ !�� �^'w•-�c ,vim- =e..��,
We are reluaztant *o; formalize an appeal of this matter to,., ttw City council,
since we stilve toward the waarking out of land use pattmrnsr with staU..#
and othev affected grroups$ to attlNe at acceptable coapromiseniI `when; there ;
appears to ba: good tvtason for doing so. Howaver, As, Henry, , ha§ and oisted
that the equestrian K:cxtmMee is adamant on: their insistrrnce upon, a trail
following tha creek Led, a►high would bisect a number of the ,lots.
We also ques son tI* essentiality of the ,.„tent of equestvian trails, when
there are a a &td.)er of praspaotivs, purchasers of homes., vrhn do not with t, .
maintain equestrianacilx'ties ,2 ,r t pssrticipste in the equestrian life-
style. In f«ctr the ,, ".ity statistics shtwr that thz vast majority of hame`
bulmrs do not Idsh to own,,horses.
We realize; that, the problems set out in this letter, are ccmprehensive,,and
my require mote time for a detailed study on the part of the City;
unfortunately, ,however, existing timal constraints give -'%S itl terms of our
commitments to retire debt on the Proi�erty, no more time•to devote to long
negotiations.
AM
Ms. Henry indicated that the equest rivet canm itttee was in complete accord
with the trail system zz set but ors =x to nt ative map for Lots 1 through ll
12. For that reason, vie request the followi4g: ;, k
I. Allow us to pro<*4%, on an interaur b4'si , tentative tract 12902
covering Lots l tht'ough 12 only. so that, we could,obthin immedie.te j
tentative apgresval, for these 32 lots, and proceed whit engin2eYing,
recordation, and const=tion as,�xpeditiously a possible.
2. Request the City Coramcil take this matter under --A�visement, on a
formalized basis, {not of an appeal nature;, to' discuss the
esseriti.ality at having an additional trail parallel to ,+*he one which
we are to consitruct on thn east side Of Hetmnsa, when there is an x:
additional cemim tx trail scheduled tot the westerly portion of out
praperblr :t the top of. the slope r_ through Tract lOO$8, so that there
would b" in effect, three north -s6uth trails within, as stated'
herein, 300' to 6001 of each other, with the necasssary removal of
hundreds of additional trees.` J -
Pursuant thereto, if it is found that the Creek trail is to be a
requirement fc- ,.'the development.of the balance of our propertvg;W `
would request guidance in the method in which the City ,pos
.' es to <
allow each individual lot owner to utilize his lotvidoat excessive-
invasions of 04vacy',:; and without the liability, to be incrsrzec% ;
allowing full.tt11er LV the ecstriansr of the
Of the �t `tae
. Pr'opose� "traiSE taisectnc� the lots, era .the egrtri°ur's ox��ee ~
requeats. " fit: i15 our undsrattWs dng that the city does -not wish ,ttq
r assumes t%sis 1taj.?ity, we dc' not wisi'> to do sor and 3 't1�lG;xk iv +a ,
�r assum pion that the purehascrs of tuxme,I would prefer x ,t t o do • '
F
i y
r,
S'.{k'4r, ' `�' ' i<• i { fie"
' + .;,,
S ixype t i bb S' tax ii z i e �# rcaFe R
ntoret+ +' iry 'naais�actsii'� a "F
fh a spa7ct.Ur'ts]Xe�&..rE • :d a�rYiiitt "
fact ust' d t r t4'CY'WCLSPad4wn #'
Sttir )acs X►rnxs�Y.h33a+b] t1a t
ti devett t_ex t'
agr rent t Eye `r8 t e k
through 32, tie ,. a Ytg �16
op
ccxtxnission, } r» a17 ;� .,'A
� R1,cburd N. t^K" Ot
Px@4ident . ,
Disk Scotts
�xt t
G
t "p 3
i 4
Q yv
,
g x't
z