HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985/07/24 - Agenda Packet0701 -02 o 7 -24 -85 P.C. Agenda Packed Page-1 of 4
w
_ ;�.,
T'
�1
u;
YC
F'
t
f
K
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
8Y:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
July 24,;985
Chairmanpnd Members of the Planning Commission
i
Jack Lam, Coawqunity Development Director
John R. Meyer, Assistant Planner
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85 -20
FORECAST A proposal to construct a two - story, 8,706 sq.
ft. office building on .614 acre of land located at t�
east side of Utica, north of Civic Center Drive in the
Industrial Park District (Subarea 7) - APN 208- 062 -07.
I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION':
A. Action Requested: Issuance of a Negative Declaration.
B. Existing Land Use: Vacant
C. Surround';ng Land Use and Zoning:
North ^Vacant, Subarea
Sorth - Vacant, Subarea 7
East - Vacant, Subarea 7
West - Vacant, Subarea 7
D. General Plan Desi nations:
Project Sit--Industrial-Park
Nor'h Industrial Park
South - Industrial Park
East Industrial Park
West - Industrial Park
E. Site Characteristics: . Existing rough graded pad within an
approved office executive tennis center. -
II. ANALYSIS:-
A. General:` The subject property is part of the Master Planned
tennis executive complex. Part I of the Initial Study has been
completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the
Enviro A t l Ch
nm_n a ecklist and found that development of the
project will generate additional traffic and increase the
Fount of water runoff from the property. However, these
increases are insignifican, since the surrounding streets and
IF drainage facilities havt- been installed, and there will be
ITEM A
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
OR 85 -20 - FORECAST
July 24, 1985
Page '
l
adequate parking facilities t(y' handle the expected project
increases, X- F60py:of part II of the Environmental Checklist is
attached for your review and consideration. Upon approval of a
Negative Declaration, Staff will grant final approval of the
project based'upon the conditions recommended by the Design and
Technical Review Committees.
ILl. RECOMMENDATION: If the `Planning Commission can support staff's
B=indings, then issuance: of a Negative Declaration would be in
order.
Res .ect ul ly subdii ted,
L X uY
Jack Lames .
Community Development Director
l
JL:JM:ns
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Na lding Elevations;
Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Landscape Plan
Exhibit "E'° - Grading Plan
Initial Study, Part II
1
t W antl JY� n aMt6
3g Chk Canter Dtha
S 1 r
� Mtics 5 acs
rr� ,
K Mart Dapaitment Store
Yreant
r � t
qy�� r.reaswe�ewrwenaenon
Civic Canter Ottles Comp$ex
Vents
rare ' S • ,....
� rwea rrr r..r
f Chic Cantor Orbs
! •
vwmt
`
LION kAmtrw Compisx ter' C �••"�' °"�
..
v V
NORTH
CITY OF
ITEM..
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE-
PLANNING DIVISION EXHur. SCALE-
.
a I x�li�F s f 71
• ��,.naen•r ( � y ' � _rw
pia
'.M•Y f't alit � _� �
t �
Two. stay o fk. eukLq o
t
oths'Knor"s
' 1 � " ; � - -- • �•'.1�:..» }��`. Fie "f"w ':.�'il�
.�.•.r+rwwr .
i
..w.w
__ ___ _ -------------------------- .w vvr ro..s
.w. �ataMtWR`_
------------ _ -__
*T*A-eA .,rA"ro
vxnr r.mw . +u.d
r '� •
�Y 1AeP 7YCkal street Seetlae Ana MdyW .
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMO\rGA TITLE:
PLANNING DIVISON EXHIBIT. -SCALE. ""`
i
CITY Or
K RANCHO CUCA.N IONGA
PLANNING D?VISIQN
5.
ITEGNI-
TITU -925 Ul�i�li
EXHIBIT SCALE,_ ._;.
CITY OF RANCHO C.TCAMONGA
-;PART II - INITIAL STUDY
t
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
w
DATE:
burial of the soil?
c. ,Change in topograph} or ground surface
contour intervals?
d. The destruction, covering or modification'
of any unique geologic or physical features?
e. Any potential increase in Find or water
erosion of soils, affecting either on or off
site conditonn?
f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? �
S. Exposure of People or proaezty to geologic
hazards such as earthqua',es, landslides, mud-
slides, ground failure, %r_ "similar hazards ?
b h:. An increase in the rate of extract!on and/or
'r
use of any mineral resource? • e,
2. H drolo Will the proposal' ha significant
results ,in: _
if
APPLICLM
- F
FILING DATE: 'LOG M MT3ER•
PROJECT:__/
PROJECT LOCATION: e- TJ �,�-• � � � p
p �. n�
I. ENVIROMMENTAL IMPACTS _
(Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required or, attached
sheets).
YES NfA.Y$E MO
1. Soils and Geoloay. Will the proposal have
significant results in;
a. Unstable grand conditions or in changes in
geologic relationships? f
f
b. Disruptiuns,• displacements, compaction or
Page
2
YES MAYBE NO
a.
Changes in currents, or the course of direction
Of flowing streams,
rivers, or ephemeral stream
channels4
/
b.
Changes In absorptian rates, drainage patterns,
or the
rate -and amount of sur °acs - water
runoff? -
c.
Alterations to the course or flow of flookl
—
waters ?
t j ,
d.
Change in the amount of surface water in a nv "
body of water?
/
e.
Discharge into surface waters, o. , any
alteration
of surface wt,.er qualit;,?
/
f.
Alteration of groundwater, characteristics?
r
g.
Change in the quantity of groundwaters.
either through direct additi;,na or with -
drawals, or through interference with an
aquifer?
Quality?
(quantity?
h.
The reduction in the amount of water other—
I.
wise available for public water supplies?
I-
Exposure of people c- property to water
related hazards
�—
su{ flooding or seiches?
3. Air_ uality. Will the l have Significant
results
in:
is
-
.
a.
Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile
or indirect sources?
Stationary sources?
b.
Deterioration of ambient ai- quality and/or
Interference interference with the attainment of applicable
air quality standards?
�.
c.
AlteratioL+ of local or regional climatic
._
conditions, affecting lair movement, moisture
j
or tempe�atur,.?
c,
i
4. Biota
Elora. Will the proposal, have significant results
in:
Aft
a•
Change in
r
the characteristics ?f species,
`
including diversity, distribution, or number
/
of any species of plant`?
1
b.
Reduction of•fe numbers of any unique,
q rare
or endangered species Of plants?
f ,
,!
P age 3
'
C. intreducti,on of
YES ?i0
t
new or disruptive species of
into
plants an area?
d. Reductira in the potential for agricultural
production? �
%
Fauna. Will the prnposal'have:'significant
int results
a.. Change z, characteristics of species,
_.:eluding diversity, distribution, or numbers
of any species of animals?
b. Reduction of ,he numbers of acy unique, rare
or endangered species of animals?
c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of
r i
animals into an area, or result in a barrier
to the migration or movement cf animals?
s
a. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or
i
wildlife habitat?
5, '— ulation. Will the proposal have significant
.alts in:
a. Will
the proposal alter the location, distri-
bution, density, diversity, or growth gate of
the human population of an area?
/
!
i
ff
b. Will the proposal affect existing housing- or
craate a demand for additional housing?
`
6. Socio- Economic Factors. Will the proposal have
significant results in:
A. Change in local or regional socio- economic
characteristics, including economic or
commercial diversity, tnx rate, and property
j
values?
f
b. Will project costs be equitzbly distributed
among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers,
!
tax payers or project users?
f
7. Land Use and Plannine Considerations. 14,11 the
e
_
proposal have significant results in?
a. A substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area?
b. A conflict with any designations, objectives,
AIMk
or adopted plans of any governmental
r
entities,
?
a`
c. An Impact upon the qulaity or quantity of
—
A
existing consumptiva or non- consumptit
recreational opportunit1is?
A
._.
l
Page
4
YES
MYBE No
rtation.
E. results
results Will the proposal have significant
in
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular
movemer..t?
b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for
new street construction?
C. Effects on, existing paring facilities, or
r
demand for new parking?
d. Substantial impact upon existing transporta-
tion systems?
/
e. Alterations to present patterns of circula-
tion or movement of people a.n; /or goods?
I
f. Alterations to or effects r -,v present and
potential eater- borne, rail, sass transit o -•
air traffic?
g. Incre�se5 In traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyr.:i3
*s or pedestrians?
9. Cultural raal Resources. Will the proposal have
significant
c%
results in;
(`
a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological,
paleontological, and /or historical . resources?
Health, Safetv and NuisPnce Factors. Will he
`
i
proposal -have significant results in:
a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazard?
f
_-
b. Exposure of people tD potential health hazards?
c. A risk of explosion or .release of hazardous
substances in the event of an accident?
_
d. An increase in the number of individuals
y
or species of vector or pathenogenic
�r
^
organisms or the exposure of people to such
organisms?
'
e. Increase in existing noise levels?
---. —%
f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous
noise levels?
J
9. The creation, of objectionable odors?
'
h• An increase in light or glare?
144
�.
s
Page 5
11. Aesthetic_. Will the have
`ZES t3YiS1.. NO
proposal significant
results in:
a. The .obstruction or degradation of any scenic
vista or view?
f
b. The creation of an aestheticaly offensive
s
site ?
_
c. conflict with the objective of designated
or potential scenic corridors?
1$. Utilities 'and Public Services. Mill the proposal
'have
a significant need for new systems, or
alterations to the following:
a. Electric power?
-
b. Natural or packaged gas?
C- Communications systems ?r
-tf
1- ;'ater supply?
e. Wastewater .Facilities?
f. Flood control; structures?
g. Solid waste facilities?
h. Fire protection?
3.. Police protection?
j. Schools?�
k. Parks or other mean- ational facilities?
1. Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads and flood control facilities?
r t�
m. Other governmental services?
13. Enerev and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal
have significant results is
a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy?
4
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing
`
sources of energy?
J
c. An increase in tha demiand� for developr -_;: if
new sources -of energy?
d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumption
of non - renewable forms of energy, when feasible
renewable sources of energy are available?
f
Page 6
YES
MAYBE NO
e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenew„ble or
scarce natural resource?
f
14 MC. darory Findings of ai nir3�3ri�ce.
a. Does the pxo =:ect have the f '
ppt,r .tial to degrade
the uali
q t7* of "the environmerr.'', substantially
reduce the,=habita't of fish or s�il.dlife species,
cause a fish
or wildlife p:�pulation to drop
below self.austrrintng levels, threaten 'to
elim rateI plant or animal cnmmurity, reduce
F
the number or'= Yesiixct tyre rang, of a rare or
endangered plant or animal orb,eliminate
important examples of the major periods of
California history "or prehisto" -' ?
b. Does the project have'the potential to achieve
ISO
short -term, to t'.te disadvantage.. of long -term,
environmental goals? (A short - term impact on the
environment is one which occurs in ,a relatively
Zrief, definitive period of time while long -
-term
r
impacts will endure well into the future).
1
}
c. Does the project have impacts which ere
individually limited, but cumulatively
®
considerable? (Cumulatively considerable
means that the incremental
'
effects of an
individual project are considerable when viewed
in connection with the effects of past projects,
f
and probable future projects).
I
d. Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings,. either directly or indirottly?
Ile DISCUSSION CF'MURONMENTAL EVALUATION (i.e., of affirmative
answers to
the abovegrtertions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures).
{r
/ j
,.
Page 7
2ETEB 9INATIO:J
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
AIN
�I find the proposed project COULD NO!
on the envir�-gent,
nave a significant effect
and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will b_ prepared.
I find that although the proposedlproject could have a significant
effect on the environment, thWa
will not be a significant effect
in this case because the mitigation measures described
attached sheet #,have been added to the
DECLARATION W#L BE
on an
project:- A NEGITI4E
TREPARED.
st
ED I find the proposed project MAY have a significant - effect on the
envirnmenr
and an ENVIRON%,MX7 IMPACT
REPORT is /required.
�
� '� •.
Date D
fit
Signatu e
Title
AWL
I
I
t
x,
'r
t
L
,'OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
a x AFF REPORT
G�CAMO,yc9.
< i
O
z
C7
DATE: Jul 29- 1585 1977 +1
y >
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Jack Lam, Community Development Director
BY: John R. Meyer, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85 -19 -
WOLFF /LANG /CHRI STOP HER - A proposal to construct a 11,000
sq. ft. two- story office building on .69 acres located on
Lot 13 en the east side of Utica, north of Civic Center
Drive, within Subarea 7 of the Industrial Sperific Plan
APN 208- 062 -09.
I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Requested: Issuance of a Negative Ceclaration.
B. Existing Land Ilse: Vacant
C. Surrounding '.and Use and Zoning:
North - .acant, Subarea
South Vacant, Subarea 7
East - Vacant, Subarea 7
West - Vacant, Subarea 7
D. General Plan Desi nations:
i PrFject Site Industrial ark
North - Industrial Park
South - Industrial Park
East - Industrial Park
West - Industrial Park
E. Site Characteristics: q Existing rough graded pad within an
approved office executive ti.nnis center.
II. ANALYSIS•
A. General: The subject property is part of the Master Planned
`tennis executive complex. Part I of the Initial Study has been
completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the
Environmental Checklist and found that development of the
project will generate additional traffic and increase the
amount of water runoff from the property. However, these
increases are insignificant since the surrounding streets and
ITEM B
Ji
' PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DR 85 -19 - WOLFF /LANG /CHRISTOPHER
July 24, 1985
Page 2
drainage facilities have been installed, and there `will be
adequate parking facilities to handle the expected project
increases. ,A copy of 'Part I1 of -the- .Environmental Checklist is
attached for your review and cansidei,ation. Upon approval of a
Negative Declaration, staff will grant final approval of the
project based upon the conditions recommended bi the Design and
Technical Review Committees.
III. RECOMMENDATION: Ii: the Planning Commission can support staff's
findings; then issuance of a Negative Decla;^ation would be in
order.
Resp!ectfu,iy ;submitted,
Lae,,
Jack- Lamm
Community Development Director
JL :JM :ns
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Site Plan
Exhibit "CO - Building Elevations
Exhibit, "D" Conceptual Landscape Plan
Exhibit "E" - Grading Plan
Initial Study, Part II
is
t lFootl'GR Communities
Tarr and Justice Center
E
f
Vrant
�' n.rrra�r.r
OMe`_Space
i1 / s- I K. Mart Dsprtmant Stara
r Vacant
i
,w.
'Ober�`A.
r' ,--
-3e Caatar 04lka Compta �
YW
-
.rr
rr
..m
YW ` Mwi
4�\y
Vacant
Chic Center Drive
Vawd�`
SITE MILIZATION- W' --
NORTH
CITY OF ITEM=
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE; ►-Oc--- d�a�MAP,
PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT- SCALE-
x� y
I ma — .
COMCEFMAL U
� , I
NORTH
CITY OF ITEM.
RANCHO CUC.AMONIGA nTu.
PLANNING DIVISIOiN EXHIBIT--D--ScA.LEz_
7
1' \
f '
`I
-1-1
twr
.
mrt no u.a.r
sn at
u. .a.
R'ORTH
F Cil"y OF ITFM:
' RANCHO CUCA.MONGA. TtTtE-. —,QgA Dtn,�,�
PLANNING DIVISKIN EXHIBIT E SCALE=-- --____._
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA 40NGA
PART II - INITIAL STUDY
FNL'IRONMENTAL% CHECKLIST
DATE:
+: "PLICANT:
j
FILING DATE: LOG yUMBER: p
'/ C
PROJECT:'`
PROJECT LOCATION : --- ( )Zr7r.`t- jiiK
I. ENVIRON fENTAL 111ACTS
(Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required an attached
sheets).
YES MAYBE
No
I. Soils and GeoloQv. Will the proposal have
signific4nt
results in:
a. Unstable gr4aund conditions or in changes in
geologic relationships?
`
I
r
b. Disruptions_ displacements, compaction cr
burial of the
soil?
C' ,Change in topography or ground surface
contour intervals?
d. The destruction, covering or modification
Of
any unique geologic or physical features?
/
_
e• Any Potential increase in wind or water
erosion of soils, affecting either
on or off
site conditons?
r.
f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition?
g. Exposure of people or property to geologic
hz;zards
such as earthquakes, landslides, mud-
slides,
ground failure, or*similar hazards?
h. An increase in the rate of extraction, and /or
M
use of any mineral resource?
{�
2. HydLoloQy, Will the proposal have significant
results" it
•
� i�
Pa :,n
'
YES -MAYBE No
a.
Changes in currents, or the course of d=rection
of flowing streams, rivers,
or ephemeral st
channels? ream
•
.._ t
b.
Changes in absorption
rates, drainage patterns,
or the sate and amount of surface
runioff? water
c.
Alterations to the course or flow of flood
waters?
/
d.
Change in the amount of surface water in any
body of water?
i
/
e.
Discharge into surface waters, or a,ty
/
alteration of surface water quality?
!
f.
Alteration of groundwater'characteri£ -t cs?
g.
Change, in the quantity of groundwaters,
e:.ther through direct additions or with -
drawals, or through
interference with as
aquifer?
Quality?
Quantity?
h.
The reduction in the amount of water other -
wise
_-
available for public water supplies?
I-
Exposure of people or property to water
/
related hazards such as flooding or seichesl
`
3. Air uality„ Will the proposal have significant
results
in:
a.
Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile
or indirEct sources?
Stationary sources?
b.
Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or
—
interference with the attainment of applicable
air quality standards?
c.
Alteration of local or regional clioatic
conditions, affecting air movement, moisture
or temperature?
�. Biota
I'lora. Will the proposal have significant results
in:
a.
Change,in the cht,racteristics of species,
Including diversity, distribution, or number
of
any species of plants?
b.
Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of
plants?
z
.D
-
I
?age 3 .
YES `L4YBE
No
c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of AWL
plants into an area? y/
d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural
prpduction?
Fauna. Will the proposal'have significant results
in. !I
a. Change in the characteristics of species,
including diversity, distribution, or numbers
"< of any species of animals? 1.
B- Reduction of the numbers of any unique, raze i
or endangered species of animals?
c. Introduction of new or disruptive speci_s of
animals into an area, or result in a barrier
to the migration or movement of animals? /
d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or /
wildlife habitat? f
5. Poaalation. Will the proposal have significant
results in:
a. Will the proposal.alter the location, d+stri-
bution, density, diversity, or grawth ratz of
the human population of an ores?
b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or
create a demand for additional housing?
6. Soconomic Factors. Will the proposal have
si�,r_i =icant resalis'inc
i
a• Change in local or regional socio- economic
characteristics, including economic or
commercial diversity, tax rate, and property /
values? J
6 b. Will project costs be equitably distributed r
i among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, /
" tax payers or project users? f
?. land Use and Plannine Cansiderations. Will the
proposal have significant results in?
a. A substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area?
b. A conflict with any designations, objectives,
Policies, or adopted plans of any governmental
entities?
C. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of
existing consumptive or non - consumptive
recreational opportunities ?��
Page
G
YES
:L4Y3° NO
8. Transportation. Will the: proposal have significant
results
in:
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular
movement?
b. Effects'on existing streets, or demand for
/
new street construction?
C. Effects oa existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking ?!
d. Substantial impact upon existing transporta-
tion systems?
' -- Alterations to present patterns of ci,"cula_
tion or movement of people and /or goods?
f. Alterations to or effects on present and
Potential water- borne, rail, mass transitR or
f
air traffic?
%f
g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
6
Aft f
f
5, Cultbral Resources.. Will the proposal have
significant
results in:
a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological,.
f
paleontolc ,6ical, and /or historical resources?
10. Health, Safetv, and Nuisance Factors. Will the
!
Proposal have significant results in:
'
a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazard?
/
b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? ,.
r
C. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous
Substances in the event of an accident?
d. An inciease in the number of individuals
or species of vector or pathenogenic
organisms or the exposure of people to such
organisms?
e. Increase in existing noise levels?
'
f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous
noise levels?
AWL
`
g. The creation of objectionable odors?
/
h. An increase in light or glare?
_y
Page S
11.
YES ulYHE ,40
AUL
Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant
results in:
a• The obstruction or degradation of any sceni.::
vista
`
or view?
{
f
b. The creatiop -•+ an aesthetically offensive
site?
c. A confliar" withithe objective of designated
or
potential scenic corridors?
12. 'Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal
have
a significant need for new systems, or
alterations to the following:
a. Electric power. ?
/
b.. Natural or packaged gas?
a- Communications systems?
0
d. Water supply?
_~
e. Wautewater facilities?
X ANIL
f. Flood control st_actures?
g- Solid waste facilities?
h. Fire protection?
i- Police protection?
1
J. Schools?
{
Parks or other recreational facilities?
1- Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads and flood control facilities?
.
m. Other governmental services?
13. Enere} and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal
have significant
results in:
a- Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy?
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing
r
sources of energy?
c. An increase in the demand for development of
new
f
sources of energy?
!/
E
d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumption
of non - renewable forms of entrgY, when feasible
renewable sources of energy are available?
Al Page 6
_ ..; YES
`SAYBE NO
e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or
scarce
y
natural resource?
/
14. Mandatory Findings of Significance.
1
a. Does the' have the f
pfitential
to dep:rade
the quality of the environment, substant :,illy
reduce the. - habitat of fish or wildli5?:apenies,
cause fish
a or wildlife population to drop
below self'sust4ining levels,
threaten to
eliminate:4a plant or animal cp gnity,._reduce
the number or restrict the radge of a rare or
endangered plant or animal ogieliminate
- important exapples of the m, or periods.of
California history.or prcilistory?
l
b. Does the project have the potential to achieve
short -term, to the disadvantage of long- term,
environmental goals? (A short -term impact on the
environment is one which occurs In a relatively
brief, definitive
period of time while long-
term impacts will endure future).
11 into the
ca Does the project hale impacts which are
individually limited, but cumulatively
Aft considerable? (Cumulatively considerable
means that
Rv the incremental •ffects of an
individual project are considerable when viewed
in connection with the effects of past projects,
%
and probable future projects).
/
d. Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings,,either directly or indirectly?
__
IL DISCUSSION OF EMMONMENTAL EVALUATION (i.e., of affirmative
r the above answers to
questions plus a discus ion of proposed mitigation measures).
�I
f..
,
v Page 7
III. DETER.** --- MINATIOv
On the basis of this ikitial evaluation:
I find the proposed project COULD 1101'. have a significant effect 1p
on the envi::onment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepacyd.:
I find that al{,!hough the proposed project could have a significant
effect on the 1nvii3nment, there will not bpi a, significant effect
in this case b' —use the mitigation measure; described on an
attached shee;Ahave been added to the project. A NEGATIVE
DECD CATION ;ql BE PREPARED.
I find the prop sed project NMY have a significant effect on the
(_J envirnment, and an ENvIROa D NT THPACT RrYO-RT required,
Date
Signature
Title
r
E
V
r
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
CUCAMp, .
< s
O O
Z
U� `>
DATA: July 24, 1985 1977
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Jack Lam, Crimmunity Development Director
BY: Nancy Fong, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW OF TRACT 12632 - ARCHIBALD ASSOCIATES
Reapplication for design review of adding one new
elevation for the 9 single family homes within the tract
in the Low- Medium (4 -8 du /ac) Residential Districts
located at Monte Vista Street, between Archibald Avenue
and Ramona Avenue - APN 202- 181 -05, 06, 15, 16.
I. ABSTRACT: The Planning Commission at its regular meeting of May
2 5, considered and approved minor changes to the previously
approved elevations with the condition that the roof material be
changed from asphalt shingles to concrete tiles. An appeal to this
condition is pending for City Council review on August 3,.
II. ANALYSIS: The developer is requesting approval for one additional
elevation designed specifically for the 9 single family lots
fronting on Ramona Avenue. This new elevation has 1,902 square
feet, and features a variety of roof line heights, and window
treatments. The Design Review Committee recommended approval
subject to charging the roof materials to concrete tiles and
subject to the original Conditions of Approval for this tract.
III. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning. Commission
consider all inaterial and elements of this project. If the
Commission concurs with the Design Review Committee
recommendations, approval of elevations through adoption of the
attached Resolutions would be in order.
Respectfully spbmitted,
Jack Lam
Community Development Director
JL:NF:cv
ITEM C
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Tentative Pract 12532 - Archibald Associates
July 24, ,185
Page #2
AML
- r
Attachments: Exhibit "A" Locaticn,Map
Exhibit "B" - Tract Msp
Exhibit "C" Proposed Elevations
Exhibit 'D" r- Floor Plan
Original Resolution with Conditions
Resolution of Approval
t
is
F
lcl
f�
G
NURTH
CI'T'Y OF ITEND. "T IZ9 3 'Z..
l RANCHO CLTCAMONGA TrrLE= t..n -rtat� Nt,q -n
PLANNIILG DIVISQN F,Xt-IIBIT- _A SCALE--CC='
0L'
m",
NORTH
CITLY OF rrEM: " 1. 3 " . ',o!/ aural
�
ICHO CUCAMONGA TITLE-. a
PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT= SCALE
�'la
I
CITY OF
RANCHO CLJCAMOI,,rA
PLANNIN r, DI vmoN
or i
NORTH!,
rrEm.
TITLE- ►��T7' /j
EXHIBIT-SCALn - •�'"
I
IT
I"
NORTH
CiT'Y'F
ITEM -
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITL D f
PLMNIM DI'MON EXHIBIT
i
.. ti
C
i
i
NORTH
CITY OF AN ITEM: �,2��
RCHO CT IC.MONr.A TITLE:
PLANNING DIVISION > XHIBM SCALC= /y
i
r
r
RESOLUTION No. 84 -180
A RESOLUTION OF T',SE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAh:.RO
I CUCAMONGA, CALIF'ORNIA, AMENDING PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION 8434 CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT
` HAP Noy 12532.
t f
�EREAS, tentative Tract Map No.. 125325 hereinafter "Map^ cuFmStsed
byArchibald:ASSS.oiates, applicant, for the .purpose of subdividing the raal
property situatel in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,. County of San. Bernardino,
,,bate or California, descrik�l as a residential subdivision of 14.5 acres on
ti-"e vast &4e of Ramona, o Monte Vizca Street, into 112 lots, was appealed
and c=s before the Cit? Council for public .hearing and action, on June 20,
1984; and
�. WHEREAS,. the .City Council has read and considered the i•eer
sn iat the
Planning .Divlsion'a reports sad has considered other evidence presented at the
Public hearing. .
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the Cit7 of Rarcho Cucamonga fines
i hare4 recommend approval of the Map subject t,, .nil condi ions set forth in
Planning Commission Resolution 84 -34 with the. addition or the following
S.3etioni
SECTION 3s Tentahive Tract Map. 12532, is hereby approved subject to
Planning Commissio:] Resolution 84 -34 and the following additional conditions:
1. The site shall be developed in accordance with the
• approved alternative site plans, as modified by the
City Vouncil, which deletes Plan I, single story
model.
2. The front setback on the majority of lots shall be
l 18 feet or greater behind sidewalk to pacilitet;a
parking in the driveway. However, in no case sk,all
the front setback be less than 16 feet behind
sidewalk.
3.. Lrovide Increased front yard landscapic.; that
i exceeds the minimum City requirement. in accordance
with approve.: ...front yard :landscaping conceptual
plan.
4. Screen the rear of lots 63 through 65 from London
Avanue "- providing dance iacdscaping (i.a„ minimum
15 gallon trees at 20 feet on center), and providing,.
6-foot hight masonry, block wall along the entire
northern property line :(i.e.,.lots l and 63 through
73). Details shall br Included in the landscape
place to the satisfaction ofthe City planner.
S. Require additional landscaping on lot 38 along
southern property line and 1oh 44. along the northern'
Property line, and additional architectural, .
treatment along the rear of lots 38 through 44.
1 Details shall be included in the landscape plans to
t the sattsfaction of the City Planner.
1 L 6. All streets shah be constructed to City standards,
1 in terms or pavement, curb and gutter, and driveur:y...
( approaches. Rolled curbs shall . not be permitted.
7. Provide 15 -foot minimum flat usable rear yard area
per City grading standards,
j #( 8. Street "A "' shall be constructed with a 36- foot
i pavement section per City. standard for residential
itrests to be designed subject to staff approval.
r
i
r
r
RESOLUTION No. 84 -180
A RESOLUTION OF T',SE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAh:.RO
I CUCAMONGA, CALIF'ORNIA, AMENDING PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION 8434 CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT
` HAP Noy 12532.
t f
�EREAS, tentative Tract Map No.. 125325 hereinafter "Map^ cuFmStsed
byArchibald:ASSS.oiates, applicant, for the .purpose of subdividing the raal
property situatel in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,. County of San. Bernardino,
,,bate or California, descrik�l as a residential subdivision of 14.5 acres on
ti-"e vast &4e of Ramona, o Monte Vizca Street, into 112 lots, was appealed
and c=s before the Cit? Council for public .hearing and action, on June 20,
1984; and
�. WHEREAS,. the .City Council has read and considered the i•eer
sn iat the
Planning .Divlsion'a reports sad has considered other evidence presented at the
Public hearing. .
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the Cit7 of Rarcho Cucamonga fines
i hare4 recommend approval of the Map subject t,, .nil condi ions set forth in
Planning Commission Resolution 84 -34 with the. addition or the following
S.3etioni
SECTION 3s Tentahive Tract Map. 12532, is hereby approved subject to
Planning Commissio:] Resolution 84 -34 and the following additional conditions:
1. The site shall be developed in accordance with the
• approved alternative site plans, as modified by the
City Vouncil, which deletes Plan I, single story
model.
2. The front setback on the majority of lots shall be
l 18 feet or greater behind sidewalk to pacilitet;a
parking in the driveway. However, in no case sk,all
the front setback be less than 16 feet behind
sidewalk.
3.. Lrovide Increased front yard landscapic.; that
i exceeds the minimum City requirement. in accordance
with approve.: ...front yard :landscaping conceptual
plan.
4. Screen the rear of lots 63 through 65 from London
Avanue "- providing dance iacdscaping (i.a„ minimum
15 gallon trees at 20 feet on center), and providing,.
6-foot hight masonry, block wall along the entire
northern property line :(i.e.,.lots l and 63 through
73). Details shall br Included in the landscape
place to the satisfaction ofthe City planner.
S. Require additional landscaping on lot 38 along
southern property line and 1oh 44. along the northern'
Property line, and additional architectural, .
treatment along the rear of lots 38 through 44.
1 Details shall be included in the landscape plans to
t the sattsfaction of the City Planner.
1 L 6. All streets shah be constructed to City standards,
1 in terms or pavement, curb and gutter, and driveur:y...
( approaches. Rolled curbs shall . not be permitted.
7. Provide 15 -foot minimum flat usable rear yard area
per City grading standards,
j #( 8. Street "A "' shall be constructed with a 36- foot
i pavement section per City. standard for residential
itrests to be designed subject to staff approval.
r'
- 8e3ulution'No. 84 — *80
-
Page. 2 :..._
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this
20th day or June, 1984.
AYES: Wright, Buquet, Mikelo,
Dahl, Ting
NOES: None
ABSENT- .None
�,
p D. Mikelny -Mayor
ATTEST:
He¢ +,rA�elet,
CSLp Clerk.
ak.
i
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -34
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP N0. 12532
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Nap No. 12532,, hereinafter "Map" submitted
by Archibald Associates, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real
property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino,
State of California, described as a residential subdivision of 14.5 ,cres on
the west side of Ramona, at Monte Vista Street, into 112 lots, regularly came
before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on ApriT. 25,
1984; and _
WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval, of the Map subject'
to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's
reports; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the
Engineering and Planning Division's repots and has considered other evidence
presented at the public hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission or Lhe City of Rllncho
Cucamonga does resolve as follows:
SECTION 1; The Planning Commission makes the following findings' in
regard to Tentative Tract No. 12532 and the Map thereof:
(a) The tentative tract is consistent with the: General .
Plan, Development Code, and specific plans;
(b) The design-or improvements of the tentative tract is
consistent with the General Plan, Development Code,
and specific plans;
(c) The site is physically suitable for the type of
development proposed;
(d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause
substantial environmental damage and avoidable
injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat;
_I
(e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious
public health problems;
(f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict
with any easement acquired by the public at large,
now of record, for access through or use of the
property within the propose subdivision.
s°
Resolution ;io.
Page 2
(g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on
the environment and a Negative Declaration is
issued. ;
_ f
SECTION 2:. Tentative Tract iMap No. 1*332, a copy of which is
attached hereto, is hereby -approved subject to all of the following conditions
and the attached Standard Conditions:
4 . f
PLANNING DIVISION
1. Approval of Tentative Tract IZ532 is granted subject
to the approval df Development District Amendment-
83-07 by the Planning Commission and City Council.
�.
2.o The site shall be developed in accordance with the
approved alternative site: plans, which includes (1)
a paved street connection to Ramona Avenue at Monte
Vista; (2) increased front setbacks on a majority of
lots; and (3) reverse plotted houses to provide
greater driveway separation, In no case shall the
front setback be less than 5 feet from the
right -of -way line to acccuanodate a public utility
easement.
3. Recreational amenities are required in conjunction
with common open space areas such as, but not
limited to, swimming pools and spas and court
facilities. In addition, enclosed tot lot
facilities with play equipment and large open lawn
areas are required. Detail's shall be included in
final landscape plans.
4. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the
purpose of assuming that each lot or dwelling unit
shall have the right to receive sunlight across
i adjacent lots or units for use of a solar eneray
r system. The easements may be contained in a
declaration of restrictions f::r the subdivision,
which shall be recorded concurrently with the
recordation of the final map or issuance of permits,
whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit
the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures,
fixtures, or any other object except for utility
wires and similar objects pursuant to Development
Code Section 17.08'.060 -G -2.
5. An alternative energy system is required to provide
domestic hot water for all dwelling units and for
heating any swimming pool or spa. Solar energy
shall be the primary energy system unless other
alternative energy systems are demonstrated to be of
equivalent capacity and efficiency. Details shall
be included in the building plans and shall be
reviewed and approved prior to issuance of building
permits. `% 3
''Resolution
Yo. � �
c{
Page 3
6.
Front yard landscaping is; required and shall
'qt.
include, a minimum, one,. /(1) fifteen gallon size
tree, one (1)"five tree,
gailoo-size seeded ground
cover andi a permanent irrigation system to be
installed by�the developer prior to occupancy. This
requirement shall be in addition to required street
trees.
7,
Lots 1 -9 facing Ramona shall have priority and be
constructed within Phase I.
8.
Phase I construction shall include Ramona Avenue ,V
street improvements, including street trees. `$
9.
The combination retaining wall and screen wall along
the
south project boundary shall not ,exceed an
overall combined height of nine (9) feet, as
measured from the existing grade on the south side
of the wall.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
1.
A portion of "A" street from Archibald to "E" street
and a portion of "E" street from "A" street to the
southerly tract boundary shall be dedicated to the
City as a public street.
2.
A storm drain system shall be constructed from "E"
street to "F" street along the southerly tract
boundary. Dedication
of an easement shall be
offered to the City covering the storm drain.
3.
The proposed storm drain at rear of Lot 59 shall be
realigned along the property line between Lots 58
and 59.
4.
Adequate erosion protection devices shall be
provides' along the drainage overflow easements, to
the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
5,
A portion of the master planned storm drain on
Ramona Avenue shall be constructed from the project
site to south of. the Southern Pacific Railroad to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The storm
-drain fees for the project will be credited for this
construction.
t,
r,.
El
ic
Resolution No. 84 -1
Page 4
b. All existing P.C.C. pavement on Ramona Avenue
contiguous to the project boundary shall be removed
and replaced with asphalt concrete pavement. The
cost of constructing the easterly half of the street
wild be reimbursed by the City.
7. The applicant will be required to reconstruct Ramona
Avenue from the southerly tract boundary to the
railroad right -of -way. The cost of the construction
will be reimbursed by the City.
8. Pavement taper shall be provided at the southerly
terminus of Archibald Avenue to provide for drainage
any` traffic control. Adequate right -of -way on
Archibald Avenue shall be acquired to provide for
the taper.
9. Street "A° shall be 28 -feet :vide (curb to curb) from
Street "E" to Street "G ". All other interior
streets shall be of 36 -foot width.
10. A 50 -foot wide offer of dedication shall be mad? on
Monte Vista Street.
11. A five -foot public utility easement along both sides
of all interior streets shall be reserved on the
map. "
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25th DAY OF APRIL, 1984.
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU,^.AMONGA
Dennis Stou hairman
ATTEST: ��
I, Ric Gome , Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 25th day of April, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: STOUT, REMPEL
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS; JUAREZ, MCI,-'EL
,Y
U -/s
.
. I !
N
Z
Y
U
Q7
•b
rL
Q.
V �1
W w u QO
�C q \N C` ?C•C • 4--
d. 9pq
� au
u c °q n c °vem co+ 4
A7 c o .,GG w` > <
g
t l b N A u E Y E V 6 q H n L G 1� A O A n C V O
ig
W U V r F ti� N� n1� N� O •"�
1
El
2
Gti
dCy- C
C• •�O
q
oA'
qY♦v_°.0
r
300
yY
A4
y y.
DS
N qy '
? >O 9
Ah
q�
nL CEO
v1.0 Y 6
ouF
aN
W
�
Y LZ
Y�� ,
YZ
y°
oaG
N
^o ..
2
o°. cie
b c
�n
Loy
.ON
�=
� BOO.^
0
q^ q^
Ojt
6gEC$E
Lyyy
SYU
v._w°.
wiL MEN
49
0�.,�9
'°tea
o9 �q
unq.
9„'EL
.`-.��
aq6
•
w�`E
�01q
^
ti
N.O. ♦'.N
dG^
dzt
n
..
OL
cia
y '^
_ ry
v
q
^ mx,"
^�i
Ana
od.
uu
A.a =a.r
SLR
NOy
OLd
MOgN
d
A.+�
��Na
d •
LC dy
w
q.�
... ND
Q
1
RO.
a.N..
O EN
61 qq
Y Y
2q
.Fqi. �
F
^
^q
+L•ow L�
n4�
iSr
G
S>
as
d
r C aC
�ay
y
d �y
F q
Y «K
p,9
`y
dG`U
GAN j ^.qo
q0
OQV°-
yp
Yy�
F
r�
O s
qS.G
C=
C d^ ^
L9
y
d 0
>� � w dY�
���
� qM u
•
T
•,� d
M
�
,...w
w S J
6 L o� N
O
^ d E
a d O
Y TN E•
S F ♦
4 S q
> E
d dGd
i
L
L L
t L w0 �:
sf
6.o
d
OCO
CV.Gd
r
^Y��.
g4VG
N Y
CC
Acn
n
dN Y,OU
4Eg0
pNACxi
O.,• ^�
4EEU Fu
�+y
Vw.CV
.0 E�
d Cam^
N aN
<M�GY
60om
6Yd 6gGt n. 6RU
C Nqa
@A•rd
�Q
)=6M xn
}'i N0
�
N: 4 \•O
1�
at
O\
V �1
W w u QO
�C q \N C` ?C•C • 4--
d. 9pq
� au
u c °q n c °vem co+ 4
A7 c o .,GG w` > <
g
t l b N A u E Y E V 6 q H n L G 1� A O A n C V O
ig
W U V r F ti� N� n1� N� O •"�
1
El
2
Gti
dCy- C
C• •�O
r
300
M >°
° Y
Any
A4
y y.
DS
N qy '
? >O 9
Ah
q�
nL CEO
v1.0 Y 6
W
�
Y LZ
Y�� ,
YZ
y°
oaG
o U
y
d0
d N OH
VCn
d� L��byy E♦
OC Oqy€
�n
Loy
.ON
�=
R °u
O
•
u= my°
°io
^
ti
i
L H
z
'cx c d
n
° Y
.c.-^
xV
cia
y '^
^ mx,"
^�i
Ana
od.
«d
A.a =a.r
iE
C �
1
V �1
W w u QO
�C q \N C` ?C•C • 4--
d. 9pq
� au
u c °q n c °vem co+ 4
A7 c o .,GG w` > <
g
t l b N A u E Y E V 6 q H n L G 1� A O A n C V O
ig
W U V r F ti� N� n1� N� O •"�
1
El
I'll
T
d D O u
.- .I
O A
Q 0 6
6
••°•� L ASN O.
p Uy UAL
Ems.
°
yA�
On„EY.0 vq...p
°E�2
O yu^
pY
J�A
AENEE
°vim ;z
LG1 ua.
Y Y
L
d LaS
Ni
ODECE
p�Y u�U a6�C
�O
E
.u'.L°
^
QU1
e d OAP.
Ca C 9 O �
� b6b b u
ip .G^
Z
b
b V
4
Z
c
'O�CC
A ^
5. LaANI O.2 00�p
02,
CIS^ ° v
40
O« tp ti N
O A
r.0 i 7.7
'
O Eti p E pE n0
itSMNL
b CQa
A p^
co
crd. a qa T.a •-
'e°ga ^vA �3a
'^"uvru�
N,°on=C 9a
,s„i oo °tt co
tib ci Av $'w.�a pu6
u Eda u$,
Sift "i7
.
Et
MLC
o= e� vAU
0
nPmddr '$. o G e $
ya
o v ep �7 c u.
+•V
N r G C
L
O V
C 0
r.2 b.° -C--o SrE
O
N. OV 7
i u 0
•
G < E .a. 6.
LN •Y 9 +°-
F t Q, O L u 6 d'�•'�' T 9 vYi i .0+
-A u C N .O-
p^ Y N 69 Z N L A 3 .0
LN
r^ N L ?
6 0 N
k
•
C�
aa. C.- A
eaAi iv a
D4 .Ye oa a.bc
om °L �i$c�z
a+°.ws y
yuaN
Y°i q Ccu i.0
y g
CO
�AE +T•o V
L
1-2
["'A iEU <. �.°-.-
LNYC
Na
c L �,.. ^ E
N 0 9 �. = O N u C i^ �'•
u. N .,. ,p
d
v«�CC
a.D O_FCF OAV
N^
G 6 d •
6
q N
-H
A �-
pc
_c
d eoa
9 O
^VpC bRU O..^.�y�•pCy V`Ej�E
2
vn^y Vim. A
CnC d
��U6
VaY W E
c
Aq ^Qqt 6�
f.lW Aa
6i ��
iu
td. a GV
u?
CN CcV
[
N
M d V �O
Y
Sq �9•p• �Y
COY CUV
q� d
>N V y
Pudu m b a
O u'V ub
>W
M-0
dCN
E 4
pn U. 0 m
9.A
LO
Su
< ^.NA N:qq <.0 Y anA.0 PV
p
c5
E `p a.
L .
W ^
I'll
.31Z.°cq t0 c0 OYA6ayi
V N O U D• N q� Q Y a y C C °
V C LLC O C R N T 6a i Na O � O V C O N' Y
N. O V a. L b �• Ud= G G C^ U$ LS ^ON A y C L L V
ol
L O �rj�V � O' ••6�OIC
e
g6E ''^oC 4
L U C E N O u V G
E? c OOV A!. p o L • g In ay mm0
^uNL � Olup� �°wOC.
•i+ v C ^^ 3� 4a u V r � N C Q� d V ° b A
EYa S� ��Y _a' �E'1 y «v'iu `�Cq� oylp Ii gy?oC
y C a W �• A i a . V Y O C Q C L 2 O'p L C y
Y TLO' L.L n�'b6�cw� Eva �r N.�C ^..6b
dd °�m0 • A dA Y °•�bEA K . UN� ^04
• MNN
Zo
4p
� ^O u _N V QI Z9.r Y rNa OIC MgV`V N L7
�3vu yy'Cy..�a VN1. p ti N V^4n�y.
lu
V C 11 ^a O tT p1a 1C ya E 1� E'. 64� N
L G 4 O d Y r^ yp Z -o zz C at C G M O N N 5V r•
C
� b
MI`s Y
w �►
11
„`
^O�
q
�°
N4
=aa°, •d.
Na �-
Nor. I =
•�•
cab
va qn
_TUO Oa.
W
c6.uT
ko
ao
$ `a
u'-
22:
pN�
op A�
a
ai
,, f
c
woNC
A
'o
i
a .bc
as
c�
=yoa
LA v
`A
ca
M poy^
cq
°4vu
C
_ ^O.I.ss
°
iNA=
aNgq
.°.
•.aubA
A'
..ca "3'
m�Lu
L� yNA
�y� N
a
La
obi
N
Y C
'Yg'
LY �.
Y O B
6.� s•
s
Y
Lq`�E
t9
p10
d9dy •
y 01 uq.
O °q
°„ •
L'^
C6
NC
C
>
YS
u^
C q 4N
au• C.�d
I
�d s.O+
O6�• O1.
o�+
N N Y
q E
dE
d
O'•. i r'
d q>
iC^
YTu
•^ 4a E
y W N
r
a
u
o t
yNSC�°
doN
�pY
d
G
=0
na
OIq
gg9
•�A.a..
N C' C
^
•�.. C O
N N
OAR
Y
Cl C r
Y O
d o
t].•
C
d 9 d
1-•Na uM
m OX
N. SNy
q
C C� C u
JL E+C”
4 N
L 6
�q�q'
G40
OY
ml
d•I
� � � �
��I
W
N�
�I
.31Z.°cq t0 c0 OYA6ayi
V N O U D• N q� Q Y a y C C °
V C LLC O C R N T 6a i Na O � O V C O N' Y
N. O V a. L b �• Ud= G G C^ U$ LS ^ON A y C L L V
ol
L O �rj�V � O' ••6�OIC
e
g6E ''^oC 4
L U C E N O u V G
E? c OOV A!. p o L • g In ay mm0
^uNL � Olup� �°wOC.
•i+ v C ^^ 3� 4a u V r � N C Q� d V ° b A
EYa S� ��Y _a' �E'1 y «v'iu `�Cq� oylp Ii gy?oC
y C a W �• A i a . V Y O C Q C L 2 O'p L C y
Y TLO' L.L n�'b6�cw� Eva �r N.�C ^..6b
dd °�m0 • A dA Y °•�bEA K . UN� ^04
• MNN
Zo
4p
� ^O u _N V QI Z9.r Y rNa OIC MgV`V N L7
�3vu yy'Cy..�a VN1. p ti N V^4n�y.
lu
V C 11 ^a O tT p1a 1C ya E 1� E'. 64� N
L G 4 O d Y r^ yp Z -o zz C at C G M O N N 5V r•
C
� b
MI`s Y
w �►
11
ai mvc I=
uq " F� �` • o � e =b p w n<` rEy
•\ C w u t V u s�� V v N u �. •< G o y u � A .� D
sr:in�,o AN•+"„ °N t.� A yy� .fie °?'
n. A'^a;op ,•.44 �. _o �yyo uu t•_� 'M1 Ate. oA°
Q L'LAA Yr4iC Gl OL EN �a C'J AL aA A�7
L".dAaLIAS. 4r 40V
g, off'o
�+_4 ia'L as a . uc
4 L° 4 aL 4T �Ca
uA��i '4'4�a�ff 4L N v= da hu °.�ir`4: �F AoNU:
`6��]4•.a + YAU! . N O. C,°o w4.i . . OU �i-E Ca N� '
Ai >UG 6- -.8
�6 V�62QM eCIY KCIFO
� Y
IK
m�e z° y.`..
po
4 w r. � •• N r _�� L
LY -0LA u C.' G � • ��O s O..
.Cr V y y
O N � N g li �•
�4 � U« C • � gv p O. p� 0 4q. O
° f � e
L i V
51
u q = Cd a O 04
C T C.O
N
u�Nb C�t 4�'rtiQc ;y�U
..r L `� .-YL N4 4. q� L•''O w+ ri'Aw�.
�y1tiO N uV� � \ Y,.•,� C�'tJM
-
A
`lt m com. > N _ aTm aio oL �I
YY `rt v °4
� O 4Y� O E•O^ L Vd tTOL N 40 <O �' 4bVOa
i LEi I: wES °4w.v Fin r*e °r a 'l l•x i: a o} o� ez-uwi
{-- 02 �� -
0
R
C
1Z
41
U
0
L
LL
C�
Q
R
F
y
A
O.
sl
r
Q
4w
G L
V C N
C L V u
s
i .,.
C
O
g
sW
co'
k
X
S�TFO�
vYM a
N..i
L C n
C
a
O
b
w
•vz�u
Y
?CI
G
Y
°L C
WYY
wJ
N 3
Jk
VM y
1 X
C 6
J =
L Wei
Vqm
L�OY
u G4Y
.D 6'
u ca
.•O. {Gj
\.
L
r
ON4
aG.G..a
`COL=
a nL
M�:C
�uvuN'�
qN t
y
iCF
w,.M
q
rti L
aF
L
Y
GO
V
� °CL
zq .�.
uz•�. ce°.
mb NU
.,.c
m€
= OZ
g. �C
y
Y >
-L
Y
°60
.°..
YYYT
yqC
LL
uYiL yyPO
vYLMyP
6••
C'.•�
O
L
`. 4bLry
33
N.HOJC
yy
y�i.
.� Jt O
py
Ng
4
yg L
jaaji�;;
gWI
4 ^C S.w.
MAY
fld
_
O�Na•�.�
YY
_
.•
D vdr^'•.
°So
;
YNE
Ny
P 0pp
wO.N
^gig
O m0
a°
�g
�t;�am
��
V gptl°
°�s�
.'.
FgnC
•
YN.�..JF
G.mc
aVI J
q V1aV iiC
_P.r
n�° y
OTC°
�q0
..o a•
ouv
L
^.
• �+
G J
U .t S Ei
&Z ill
y G
yy
-A
°
V U
.r
u
N L
�+i
Nb° 2 N..
C y
>g 01 Nr
C O�Q
�VJ4
2.vF+
aw
6.'oi
E
C.`
Li.iAwc
<i 3.
`;
W
• m OIL
.C;-�
r. ••"'�
N. �l
N �a>
N Sy e Q
!: :—M
C •EM.L
Nil
11. as
M KI•V.O
Ott uw
K O4 VCI Pq
O
+A
A
i
...
C�
Q
R
F
y
A
O.
sl
Q
4w
G L
V C N
C L V u
o
> NC C
C
g
sW
co'
k
X
S�TFO�
"+ T L
O
N..i
Y
L+
O
b
w
CaC
WYY
wJ
N 3
Jk
VM y
1 X
C 6
J =
L Wei
Vqm
L�OY
u G4Y
.D 6'
u ca
.•O. {Gj
\.
L
r
ON4
aG.G..a
`COL=
a nL
M�:C
�uvuN'�
qN t
y
iCF
w,.M
~
L
°
_ •
C�
Q
R
F
y
A
O.
sl
4w
G L
V C N
C L V u
o
> NC C
C
p�j�
S�TFO�
"+ T L
O
F L �Z ad
Y
L+
O
b
w
CaC
gP°r.
J =
L Wei
Vqm
L�OY
u G4Y
Jy <w.
.•O. {Gj
L
Y.q � E
<
� y�=
ON4
aG.G..a
`COL=
a nL
M�:C
�uvuN'�
qN t
y
iCF
w,.M
~
L
°
_ •
L
Y
"°'�°
hoc
�'qJ
i°Gq
uz•�. ce°.
mb NU
.,.c
m€
= OZ
g. �C
y
Y >
-L
Y
°60
.°..
YYYT
yqC
LL
uYiL yyPO
vYLMyP
6••
C'.•�
O
L
`. 4bLry
w q•'
xCywj
oa y..
y Lm
pv.aV
Fao .G.
— ^mg°' m
6 p
^M
yµ
4 �mYF mm
a vW
e
p JO
Vr'�`
6`0�..,
YOB
_
O�Na•�.�
GC
.•+ .�.�q
V
_
.•
D vdr^'•.
Ln
;
YNE
wO.N
O m0
CPS
@ >n4n
Y.MCA�A
4.Y
V gptl°
°�s�
.'.
FgnC
NQJ
YN.�..JF
G.mc
aVI J
q V1aV iiC
N
..o a•
ouv
a'v�
4'•e:az
y
C O�Q
�VJ4
•O.O tLO..<
L�
CV
�Ob�
E
C.`
w
Y
p°
C
•m. '�
p
n
ti NiiiV��l OI%f
L.V
z.�I
•Cq qC
N �a>
N Sy e Q
!: :—M
C •EM.L
Nil
11. as
M KI•V.O
Ott uw
K O4 VCI Pq
O
+A
A
...
K
.rqV•
a
,l
4i
V
6t
m
O
S V
iii
W� 1
C�
Q
R
F
y
A
O.
sl
c1
O
Z
U
d
.O
i
d
i J.
V
V
Q
Y
V
t
r
Sa' 9
9YC G S
SY,ZZO m
m
y�cQ `
`T_r�� x
u. c. •
♦'�
�L
w� Y
yYF @FUC
LI
S y.
'o
� x
SSa §` Y
4
w� �
� -
O L Y L
LCyv.�. V
V° �
�• w
� ° �
Aw
N oCC�Vq,.L. N
G
d .°CY T i
i V`.O� O
i
V TQ. ♦ '
'L f
Nv
S) e
e S r z �
O NVe
• €
€WOW .
.G°n =° V
Vt`O Y
Y p
Oh � S
=.. d
VW
q
w
1t
V
H
...�..
OO p
ecu
Wig!
`� d.L en
'WYG
9N Ww
tf9 °'�3 w
N.
^r� 1
1 d
��
tjw
iA
lb
p C.2
°SV
a-. 06N d
d.�L.
NLY� V
V�YCLr H
Hi p
pflJ,-Qu _ P
P
p ♦
Owa Y^ C
Cps °
°q$Q.E Y
�ppL c
YO. \Oh 4
4.5 L
L~6Y� '
'O • qw
3� O T
gaL�O Y
Y�` w
wTL�
O
clri °
Nb =
C�N t
td t9•.
O °
d°cS� V
qq_ s
sl td a
z 4
4. 4
4 y
yyV L 4O°�W i
° L
V q
a g
T
I+s w
= V
iC
4
U
00
>VG
ti
dN
pOs
y Y
•� C
� �v`
«^
-C:5
tar
A>i u w
� �'i v
IN.•L_ �«
.GU
inn
K_
OI`I NI
p
V
V
Q
Y
V
t
. A C '
N P GI
Sa' 9
9YC G S
SY,ZZO m
m
y�cQ `
`T_r�� x
u. c. •
x;�u i
i> �
�a'•.Ni V L
L� '
' ^•.+uS S
S y.
SSa §` Y
Y
w� �
� -
O L Y L
LCyv.�. V
V° �
�• w
� ° �
-C N
N oCC�Vq,.L. N
N
d .°CY T i
i V`.O� O
O V
V TQ. ♦ '
'L f
f°C S
S) e
e S r z �
O NVe
• €
€WOW .
.G°n =° V
Vt`O Y
Y p
Oh � S
=.. d
dw��N Y
q
u. .
. u w
w. a
a c n
n N L
L
4i '
'GY V «c 2
2.2. t
tf9 °'�3 w
w_ a
a'rvy.�{N�i,•+�' y
y$ v
vi�uo p
p C.2
°SV
a-. 06N d
d.�L.
NLY� V
V�YCLr H
Hi p
pflJ,-Qu _ P
P
p ♦
Owa Y^ C
Cps °
°q$Q.E Y
�ppL c
YO. \Oh 4
4.5 L
L~6Y� '
'O • qw
3� O T
gaL�O Y
Y�` w
wTL�
O
clri °
Nb =
C�N t
td t9•.
O °
d°cS� V
qq_ s
sl td a
z 4
4. 4
4 y
yyV L 4O°�W i
° L
V q
a g
T
I+s w
= V
iC
4
N P GI
07'0-1-"0`2 _ o 7-24-85 R* C. Agenda Packed o Page -2, of 4
C .
Z
41
i ..
r i
a vv La 'd x
own
w_�
pp �'2
i tV
^y�j env L
n c wO
pdC '
uae
'1u
N M w 99 69
'uo
y°
...�.'±
4 V.
a Cry B.p
M
-o 6 Y
v J U A
u °u a. •oo N ^ EL Zn
L nrt
Gw
N 6C� CO n6 .a
I I 1 L9 f
6J
1
1
AESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSTON
APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT NO. 12532 LOCATED',AT
MONTE VISTA STREET, BETWEEN ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND RAMONA
AVENUE IN THE LOW- MEDIUM OISTRICI'
` WHEREAS, on the 29th day of June, 1985, a complete application was
filed by Archibald Associates :`or review of the above- described,;- project; and
WHEREAS, on the 24th day of July, 1985, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning
Commission held a meeting to consider the above- described project; and
i WHEREAS, one additional elevation was reviewed by the Planning
Commission on the 24th day of July, 1985.
K
NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as
follows:
}
'r
SECTION 1: Th.t the following can be met:
1. That the proposed project is consistent with the
objectives of the General Plan; and
2. That the proposed use is in accord with . the
objective of the Development Code and the purptrses
of the district in which the site is located; and
3. That the proposed use is is compliance with each of
the applicable provisions of the Development Code
and
4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety, or welfare, or it._terially
injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity.
SCCTION 2: That Design Review for Tract 1253L is approved subject
to the following conditions and attached Standard Conditions:
1. Roofing material shall be concrete' tile subject to
review and approval by the City Planner.
1p
"Q
r-
w
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF JULY, 1985.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO v1=AMONGA
BY:
Dennis L. Stout, Chairman
AT EST;
Jack Lam, Secretary
I, Jack Lam, Secretary of the Planning. Commission of the :.ity of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
Cit;, of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 24th day of July, 1985,: by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
Alk
I.
1-
s
s,
,r
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGri
STAFF UL EP®RT
r
O - C)
Z
[DATE: July 2k,- 1985 ,.' 1977
10:
Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
a,
FROM: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development
BY: Nancy Fong, Assistant ,Planner
_ SUBJECT: RESOLUTIO14 MODIFYING CONDITION° OF APPROVAL FOR
CONDITIONAL USE.P_ERMIT 78703 - BOARS HEAD - Located in the
Neighborhood Commiercial District at the northwest corer
of 19th Street and Carnelian -- APN 208- 811 -59.
I. ABSTRACT: The purpose of this retort is for the Planning
Cornnission t: review the Resolution n difying the Conditions of
Approval for CUP 78 -03.
II. BACKGROUND: The 'Planning Commission, at i•sf,' regular meeting of
July 10, f9_85, held! public hearing and determined that there is a
need to modify the Conditions of Approval for this CUP. The
l! Planning Commission directed staff to prepare a Resolution
modifying the closing time for the restaurant from 2:00 a.m. to
11 :00 p.m., and eliminating the previously approved entertainment
use in conjunction with this restaurant. In addition, the Planning
Commission may wish to consider opening up the 13 parking spaces in
the northwest Corner of the site, as explained in the attached memo
! dated July 16, 1985.
III. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
review the attached Resolution. If the Commission concurs with
such modifications, adoption of the Resolution would be in order.
Resiectfull s bmitted,
r� c Lam '
Director of Community Development
JL:NF: jr
Attachments: July 16, 1985 memo to Planning Commission
E July 10, 1995 !Planning Commission Staff Report
Exhibit "A" - Site Plan
r Exhibit "B" - Floor Plan
Resolution of Approval with Modifications
a
. ITEM O
CITY OF 11A NCLO CUCAMONGA
1-1i I1UIVI
DATE: July 16, 1985
TO: Chairman and Members of the .Planning Commission
FROM: Jack Lam, Community Developroent Director
BY: Nancy Fong, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: CLARIFICATION OF THE PARKING STUDY FOR BOARS HEAD - Clip
The total number of .on -site parking spaces available for the shopping
center is 197 spv;ces. Alternate 1, as shown on the attached Table 1,
assumes that the existing Savings & Loan will remain as is with no
expansion and that: future Building I'D" could have a gross floor area of
2,000 square feet (This figure was provided to staff by the owner of
the shopping center.) Based on current parking code, the total required
number of parking spaces is 189. Therefore, the on -site - parking :s
adequate with an excess of 8 spaces.
Alternate 2 assume:, that the Savings and Loan would expand their
facility by taking over the future building pad 'D ". Based on the
availability of parking space, the maximum gross floor area for the
expansion including the existing 1,000 square feet could not exceed"
5,000 square •Acet and the required parking spaces are 20. Therefore,
the total parking spaces required for the shopping center is 197, which
is stilll adequate. Nrther, with the proposed modification of the CUP
limiting the closing time to 11 :00 p.m. and live entertainment, the
Planning Commission may consider opening up the previously eliminated 13
spaces located at the northwest earner of the site to alleviate_ the
parking problem.
Should you have any questions or if I can provide you with more
information, please feel free to contact me.
JL:NF:jr
D
AMENDED TABLE I
REQUIRED NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES BY LAND USE
ALTERNATE 1 XTERIIATE 2
# OF TOTAL # OF TOTAL # OF
BUILDING #
SQ. FT /LAND USE PARKING RATIO
SPACES
SPACES
SPACES
A
1500 Sq. Ft. - 1/250
7.0
8100 so. ft.
Dentist Office
5100 Sq. Ft. 1 /100
51.0
Restaurant /Deli
(Deli & pizza
place recently closed)
2100 Sq. Ft. 1/250
8.4
Retail
66.4
66.4
B
9,470 Sq. Ft. - 1/250
38.0
21,320 Sq.Ft.
Retail /Office
750 Sq. Ft. - 1/250
3.0
Assume Retail /Office
2100 Sq. Ft. - 1/4 Seats
15.0
Church (pending at 60 Seats
review) of 50 -70 -
seats
66.0
56.0
C
5440 Sq. Ft. 1 /100
F4.4
54.4
54.4
,�.
5400 sq. ft.
Bob's Big Boy
Restaurant
Future "D" *
2000 Sq. Ft. - 1/250
8
8.0
- - - --
2000 sq. ft.
Assume Retail /Office
a• "E'° **
1000 Sq. Ft. - 1/250
4
4.0
20 **
Savings & Loan
drive- through
(5000 sq. ft. max.
for expansion)
TOTAL REQUIRED 189.0 197
TOTAL PROVIDED 197.0 197
g Spaces Over
* Per approved Master Plan for Shopping Center.
** Should the Savings & Loan expand its facility, the maximum gross floor area allowed
% based on parking availability is 5,000 square feet where the building D would be
eliminated. The total required parking - spaces for a 5,000 square foot office use
would be 20 spaces. d
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Conditional Use Permit 38 -03
July 10, 1985
Page 2
Tr;i required number of parking spaces based on the type of use
per current Development Code for each building are as follows.
Building A .....................66.4 parking spaces
Building B. ................ ..56 parking spaces
Building C ......................54.r parking spaces
Future Building 0 ..............8 parsing spaces
Building E (Savings & Loan) .... 4 parking spaces
A
Total Slumber of {parking Spacers required = 189 spaces i
The conflict occurs when patrons from one use 'park in front of
another use. Parking is available in the main parking area in the
center of the project. The property owner should be encouraged to 1,
explore methods of designating certain parkitig areas for each
user. Additic :ialiy, employees must park in the same lot as the
customers, taus compounding the problem. The proximity of 3
restaurants in the same building creates competition for those
parking spaces along the storefront.
B. Hours of Operation: The original approval For this CUP limited
the hours of operation from 11 a.m. to 11 p.m. in order to
reduce noise disturbances to surrounding residential
neighborhoods. These operating hours were modified to 2 a.m.
through an appeal by the applicant to the City Council. Due to
a fire in the kitchen last May, the business was closed for
almost a year. The restaurant was rem�deled and reopened
recently by the same owner and offers lur=ch, dinner and bar
services, but without entertainment and closes at 11 p.m.
Therefore, the nature ;of this business is consistent with the
conditions of approval for this CUP. However, the.Boars Head
still has the option to operate this business until 2 a.m.
C. 0Lions_ The Commission may consider the following options per
,I
Section - 7.04.83D(G) of the Development Code:
a_ 1. Find that the' CUP is being conducted in an appropriate
manner, that the on -site parking is adequate and that no
action to modify or revoke is necessary; or,
E -
2. Find that the CUP is not being conducted in an appropriate
manner and that appropriate modifications to conditions
are necessary.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Conditional Use Permit 78 -03
July 10, 1985
Page 8
IV. CORRESPOHDENCE: ;Ws:item has been advertised as a public healing
in The Daily Report newspaper, - property posted and notices maijed
to property owners within 300 feet.
V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
conduct a p`uBTic hearing to consider all material and testimony
presented and select from -'one of the options described above.
R"ectf vbmitted, `
is Gomez
City Planner
RG:NF:jr
Attachments: Letter from Surrounding Residents
Letters from Applicant
Table I - Requ red'Number of Parking Spaces by Land Use
Exhibit "A" - Site Plan & Land Use
Exhibit "B" - Floor Plan
May 22, 1985 Planning Commission Staff Report
I
-
i
`i
IP1MIT
S,r
cn
- - J
01-1
5,J
- w .
(
VN Z84
i 11I
e
`
� '' BGOC,E' LvA�[r •
¢!'° f l,_-11
II ,, j �J�u �_ _�j _ _..�.. — •,.-` � - �3 ilk
1 -
1 1 .
.I
�•NAJ ✓� �f,�yL.S �
DI
1
�G✓- A44L .mil l•
/�`• ° pF.� /CE
ADD G) NG£ k.l°NDcW -
WAL.L.Mb4rgiNEDGwss
N CHAN6f5 � /� \ \
.. NORTH
a y OF ITEM 3
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: _
PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT- SCALE:
r
RESOLUTION
Allk qP
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY'OF '
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA , 'iODIFYING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT 78 -08 FOR THE BAR AND ENTERTAINMENT FACILITIES
WITHIN THE BOARS HEAD ESTABLISHMENT LOCATED IN THE RANCHO
PLAZA, AT THE. - NORTHWEST ,CORNEW OF 19TH STREET AND
CARNELIAN
WHEREAS, on the 10th day of July, 1905, the Planning Commission
determined a need to modify Conditional Use Permii;78 -03 and,
WHEREAS, on the 10th day of July, 1985, the Planning Commission held
a public hearing to consider the above item.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission 6 the
City of Rancho Cucamonga resolves as follows:
SECTION 1: Aeditional conditions and changes are found to be needed
for Conditional Use Permit 78 -03 in order to comply with tFe intent and
purposes of the neighborhood commercial shopping district. Therefore, the
following conditions are added to those conditions already in effect per
Resolutions 78 -40, 82 -98, and 83 -117:
Alk 1. The hours of operation shall be from 11:00 a.m. to
11:00 P.M.
2. That entertainment uses in conjunction with this
bisiness shall -he eliminated.
3. This Conditional Use Permit shall be reviewed
annually by the Planning C`amnission.
4. This approval is ;granted for a restaurant with the
incidential serving of alcoholic beverages. A lunch
and dinner menu shall be served to maintain the
~' primary restaurant use.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS`24th DAY OF JULY, 1985.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Dennis L. Stout, Chairman
ATTEST:
Jack Lam, Secretary
r
I, Jack Lam, Secretary of the Planning Commiss.�on of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed,_ and adopted,_ -by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular medting of the Planning Commission held
on the 24th day of J!tly,,3.985, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSION IS: I
uz,
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
kQ 9
AWL
• Amok
!i
v1.L 1 ve^ ir[119 vi1V V U VlI113.V1Y llri
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 24, 1985
T4: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commis i n
FROM: Jack Lam, Community Developme t_Di
BY: Bruce Cook, Associate Planner `
SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83 -08 - LEWIS -
The development of a 377,665 square foot shopping center,
including a drive -thru restaurant, on 8.67 acres of land
in the General Commuercial District, located at the
southeast cor:ier of Foothili Boulevard and Hellman -
APN 208- 26125, 26.
BACKGROUND: This item was originally scheduled for tonight's meetinU
as a time extension to the Conditional Use Permit. However, in addi-
tion to the time extension for the Conditional Use Permit, a modifica.
tion to the orignal plan is also being requested. As a modification,
this item would require readvertising and processing as a public;
hearing. The applicant has agreed to a continuance of this item for
two weeks, to allow proper public noticing requirements to be satis-
fied.
RECOMMENDATION'. Staff recommends the continuance, until the August 14,
Tom, agenda.
JL:BC:cv
ITEM E
y�
of 5
LENS HOMES
1156 Nam%Mm main Avrnue l P.0, Box 5781 upland ; Wontla 91705/714 985.0971
HAND; DELIVERED
July 12, 1985 JUL 12
Planning Division
City cf Rancho Cucamonga
9320 Base Line Road
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Attention: Mr. Bruce Cook, Associate Planner
Subject: HELLMAN SHOPPING CENTER, SOUIWAST CORNER FOOTHILL AND IIELLMAN --
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83 -08
Dear Bruce:
This will confirm the - elephone conversation between us
yesterday, in which
I agreed to a further continuance of this item from the
Planning Commission
meeting of July 24, 1985 to the first available agenda thereafter that
permits the City to comply with the applicable noticing
requirements.
1
Thank you very much ft,, your attention to this matter.
Cordially,
LEWIS HOMES OF CALIFORNIA
hn Melcher A.I.A.
i
Project Development
JRM /mb
a C, it, m�
r a
�, OC
CIrY OF RANCI-T.0 CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
•
UAlh* July 24, 1985
TO: Chairman and `M'embers of the Planning commils I&
FROM: Jack Lam, Community ,Developmentare,-.tor
BY John R. Meyers, Aspistant Planner •
SUBJECT: VARIANCE 85-05 - DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND KWER CITY OF Los
,
ANGELES - A. proposal to reapportion'4 lots on —north side
of the 8300 block of La Colina. These Tots will not meet the
minimum lot size nor the setback requirement of the Very Low
District - APff 1061-191-10, 11, and 1061-201-29, 30.
(Continued from July 10, 1985 meeting.)
BACKGROUND: This item was continued 1'ebm. the July 30th agenda in order
to con duct—a neighborhood meeting on July 1/th. The Department of 'W'dter
and Power, City of Los Angeles, is reques.ing to amend their Variance
85-05 per the attached letter. The Department of Water and Power now
desires to merge lots 29, 30 and 31 into 1 lot (front portions) and
e.clude lot 28 (Mr. Yesingblood's residence). This would require a
variance for lot depth and rear yird setbacks.
The City Attorney has informed us that this would require the
readvertising of this item. It has been set To August 14, 1965
Planning Commission meeting. Included for your review is a letter from
the Department of Water and Power proposing the amendment and a related
site plan.
RECOMMENDATION: it is recommended that the Planning . Commission open t . he
publickearing and direct Staff to readvertise the amended Variance
request for the August 14, 1985 agenda.
JL:JM:ns
-- I Attachments
ITEM F
JI
Department of Water and Pewer a the (Ckyof ILosAmigeIles
-
TOM.BRADLEY. e•OMMIslioll
Mayor JACK W. LEENEY. Preddear
's
WALTER A. ZELMAN. 1 ?re PreiWint PAUL H. LANE, Genend 3tono,Cer and Chief Engineer
RICK J. CARUSO Npt, "4AN E. NICHOLS, Acditant General Jlanaerr . Pnlrer
E
ANGEL M. ECILEYARRIA ).DU, L. GEORGESON, A.uiraOn Gelf"ol Manger- Water
CAROL WHEELER • "-7 NORMAN J. POWERS. Cldef /manna! Off7re,
JUDITH K. DAVISON, Serrrl tr - p
July 17, 1985
DWP Piles P-3 i!992
' f and P -6_206
Variance No. 85 -05
City of Rancho Cucamonga '
Planning Commission
-
9320 Base Line, Suite C 1
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701
k`
Gentlemen:`
r
In reference to Variance No. 85 -05, we hereby ask that our original
't
request be amended. We now desire to merge the South 1/2 of Lots 29,30, and
31, Tract 7596 into one lot. The new lot (see enclosed site map), will consist
P
of 26,466 square feet. The merged lots will not include any portior, of the
r
Department's 450 -foot -wide transmission line right of way located t., she north
of the subject properties.
The original request involved the proposed exchange of the privately
GUIned North 1/2 of Lot 28 with the Department's 't -lufih 112 of Lot, 29, Tract 7596
and subsequent merger of subject lots into one lot conststing of 17,242 square
feet. Mr. Malton Youngblood, owner of Lot 28, adv.sed this Department that he
no longer wished to proceed wih the proposed exchange and subsequent merger of
'
lots after being informed that the proposed nr -v created lot would not meet
the minimum 20,000 square foot area requirea,i low the keeping of tc -R,�,j
lr
(Section 17.08.03OE2).
('
Our amended request to approve the m3vg -a,, .f the southern halves of
three lota into one lot (86,21± feet deep) will create a lot that exceeds the
Very Low District's minimum average lot size of 22,300 asquar.P feet. The new
lot will contain 26,466 square feet. A lot depth variance and front and rear
setback variance will be required to legalize the proposed let.
Your approval of the variances requested wound enable the Department:
of Water and Power to offer for sale at public auction, a legal, buildable lot
capable of being independently developed.
If you have any questions or if further information is required,
please contact Mrs. June Iwamoto at (213) 481 - 5936.
Very truly yours,
L E MOiTSSAPIZ
JT. :yb
Chief Real Estate Officer)
Enclosure
�
"d
t �1'NOeli, hope $1rael, Los /,nRelaaIr,rnl2 Q A /aging address: Box I I IAi n Amplea DW51
'
Ta1'ephone: 1 21314&1.4211 Cable Oddreu: DEKAMLA
N Aq Y-
r 4
/ a
c.
V J
y
il to i ;z �
N
no
I ol
• I
l
-
orn
cl '
Ohm
A is 7,WR..2 ?3.r4,
L f
y i
O o
iq T
t7 2 s
L
f_
N. f
.v�
i
3.. 4 � ''`�1 .a .3 1 �Gi• �.i i)'S^'>$a� til'..7� S h��4 � {19��.ft +�'y £Fy�� p �.,� �A �J � y'El+lr?S. .il ! ,�'. _1
a
i
L
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Cgcnn10�c
MEMORANDUM
a a;
1977
DATE: Zuiy 24, 1985
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commis ion
FROM: Jack Lam, Community Development Director
BY: Howard L. Fields, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSSESSMENT FEND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85 -19
- E- DERRAN_`- Constructiou of a 35,55 7 "square foot genera
retail center on 3.22 arses of -land in the General
Commercial ( District, located at the southwest corner of
Foothill Boulevard and Ramoryn Avenue - APN 208•- 301 -15
through 11.
The applicant, Parker /Dtstssn'Company, is requesting a continuance of
their above referenced it frf until the next available Planning Commission
meeting. Due to unforeseen technical problems, the applicant has not.
secured written clearance from Cal- Trans, and therefore, desires
addiwional time to rectify concerni of public improvements along
Foothill Boulevard.
JL:HF:cv
44
PTHE
t
,RARKER
`DEUTSCH
suly 16, 1985
COMP6�i11t1(
`
Chairman of the Planning Commission
City of Rancho.CUCamgnga
9320 Baseline Road
P.O. Bose 807
,9173
Rancho Cucamonga,'CA
Res CUP 85 -19.
Dear Sir:
In reference tc; our project known as CUP 85 -;9, we desire
to con t3:nue thii item until the next aVailabl.e planning
commission meeting. If you hate any cuestions, please do
not hesitate to contact our office.
AIL
Very truly yours,
PARKER DEUTSCH ASSOCIZ€TES No. VI
B The Parker De sch Company
Ge a er
I
s p Deutsch
ever 1 Partner
i
r
J DJwa
cc:. Howard Fields
.
Jt,
lo
E
E
— CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA cty�o�,
STAFF �:FFCYRT c9
A.
0 r�
E• :Z
DATE: July ,'4' 1985
1977
TO: Chairman and Members of the Pl'annit j ComMIssion
FROM: Jack Lam, Community Development director
BY: Bruce Cook, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 8,5 -09
- KNITTER & AS:SOCIATES The dev (opment of a cl iTFUay
care center and preschool on 0.91 bcres within the Terra
Vista Planned Community in the Medium Density (4 -14
du /ac), Residential District located on the northeast
corner of Haven and Valencia - APN 201- 221 -I1.
I. PROJECT AND SITS DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Requested: Approval of precise site plan, elevations,
and issuance of a Negative Declaration.
B. Existing_ Land :J se: Vacant land
C. Surroundinlg.Land Use and 2onina:
North Single Family Residential (under construction);
Medium Residential within Terra Vista
South Vacant, planned future Neighborhood Commercial
center; Neighborhood- Commercial within Terra Vista
East Single.Family Residential (under construction);
West - Mobile Home Park; Low Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac).
D. General Plan Designations:
Project Site - Law - Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac)
North - Low -Medium Residential
South ` Law- �M"dium Residential
East - Low - Medium Residential
West - Low residential (2 -4 du /ac) and Low Medium
Residential
E. Site Charactg i;stics: The site has been rough �d as part
grade
of the overall development of Tract 12590 on the east side of
Haven Avenue. 7he site is 2 - 5 feet below grade along Haven,
but w?ill be about 1 foot above grade along Valencia. There is
a 4 foot grade dif', .. nce between the project site and
residential lots to the north.
ITEM.H
_d
PLANNING 1`1MMISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 85 -09 - Knitter & Associates
July 24, 1985
Page #2
F. Applicable Re ulations�. Day care centers are considered a
"Community
Faci rtv- by the Terra Vista Planned Community Text,
and as such, can be permitted throughout the entire planned
community subject to the granting of a Conditional Use Permit.
II. ANALYSIS:
A. General: The proposed development consists of a 7,422 sluare
foot single story building - with accompanying landscapes play
area and parking facilities. Based on a proposed student
population of 150, and the - required student /teacher ratit' of
10:1, Development Code. Standards would require 45 parking
spaces. The provision of 'this many spaces results in the
reduction of available plar area below the minimum State
standard of 75 square feet per child'. As a resolution, a Minor
Exception. being requested
.is to reduce the on -site parking
requirements by 6 spaces, from 45 to 39. A parking analysis
was prepared to justify the Minor Exception (See '
Attachments) Architectural design consists of a '
Spanish /Mediterranean style, including a major accent treatment
of a building tower and Palm trees at the intersection.
B. Design Review Co mmittee• The Design Review Committee has
reviewed the project and recommended approval subject to the
following conditions:
1. Windows with a rating of at least Zrr=23, shall be
used on all liuiiding elevations, but the edst side.
Further, a sound - wall is required between the
building and the northerly property line.
2. A Minor Exception to reduce on -site parking by 10% is
appropriate and should be applied for by the
applicant. A letL& of explanation relativ(- to the
justification f,;r reducing the available on-site
parking shall accompany this request.
3. Perimeter wall /retaining wall treatment as proposed
along north line
property is satisfactory, provided`
area is attractively landscaped with cascading
shrubbery /g,round cover and climbing vines.
4. The design of the Haven Avenue parkway, including
both sidewalk -and landscaping, should be coordinated
with the Terra Vista landscape supplement.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 85 -09 -,Knitter & Associates
July 24, 1985
Page #3
F
Resp ctfully sc,� mitted,
Jack Lam
E Community Development Director
JL:BC:cv
S. All drainage issues involving the design of Valencia
shall btas resp lved to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer prior to the issuance of building permits.
C. Grading Committee: The Grading Committee has reviewed the
project and 7n comrgended approval subject to the requirement
that adequate flood protection, be provided along Haven Avenue.
D. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been
cot-;.aleted by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the
Environmental Checklist and found no significant impacts on the
environment as a result of this project. A copy of Part II X
the environmental checklist is attached for your review and
consideration. The results,of a noise study completed for the
project indicated a sound wall is required across the 20 foc,
setback on the north side of the building to protect the
adjacent play area. Interior noise levels can be achieved by
the use of windows rated at least STC =23 on all building
elevations but the east side.
III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent wth the Terra•
Vista Planned Community and the General Plan. The project will not
be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant
environmental impacts. Irs. ",addition, the proposed use and site
plan, together with the rerAirnended Conditions of Approval, are in
compliance with the applicable provisions of the Terra Vista
Planned Community, the'Development Code and City Standards.
IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing
in The Daily Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices
were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project
'a
site.
V. kECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
4
consider all material and input regarding this project. If the
Commission concurs with the Findings and Conditions of Approval,
adoption of the attached resolution and i',suance of a Negative
Declaration would be in order.
Resp ctfully sc,� mitted,
Jack Lam
E Community Development Director
JL:BC:cv
i
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 8S -09 - Knitter.& Associates
July 24, i985
Page #4
Attachments: Exhibit. "A!l - Land Use
Exhibits "S" - Location and Site Utilization
Exhibit" "C" - Preliminary Site Plan
Exhibit "D" - Architecture
Exhibit""E" - Landscape Plan
Exhibit "F" - Grading Plan
Part II Initial Study
Nofi'e StwAy
Parking AnalysisF
Resolution of Approval vtit, `t..tiditions
I
BASELINE
FOOTHILL
z RESIDENTIAL _
a Lu
F.-T VERY LOW <2 DU's /AC
LOW 2 -4 DU's /AC
C=7-7 !,OW-MEDIUM 4- 8DU's /AC
`4IUM 4-14 DU,-;/AC
`UM -HIGH 14- 24- ®U's /AC
'24-30 DU'S/AC
O - MASTER PLAN REQUIRED
NORTH
CITY OF I1'Fr11 ►� —
1,.!].l�, 0 CUCANIOI�GA TITLE-
PLANNING DIVISION EXHiP'T ---" $CALE-
I
f
Iq
S •.AYf� •`J
SBi4CT. NO. 1258CN I�yyy(
PROJECT SITE w
�� —4 NEIUHEcPNOOO teMKE¢'�(. � . • .' � ���,,•
I� F
I� fia
t�
CtZY PRx1c
a '
G�
NORTH
CITY Or ITEIM: e -o
R .4A-NCHO CUCA.MONGA
'Ra
PLAIVNING DIVISIO��I rXHItiiT_ SCAI E
.�i
CORNEF
DESIGN
ie p sfio
An � �» m F/
11 t.34umun Silt l / � rll,�1,1, ORO
POPULATION
STUOENTS(MAX) 150
STAFF (1:10) 15
PARKING R €R
BUMTO BTAFFNII Ij€ R6
+{5R €9 1
PARKING ACTUAL
STANDARD (9x19) 30
COMPACT IWO 14
H.0 (14:19) 1 I
TOTAL 45 i
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
inuuU
l
rc f
ah ceorchicura & pleming
L�
NORTH
CITY OF ITE%4- og
RA N-CHO CLTCAN1OItTGA TITLE:
PLANNINN1G DIVLSION EXHt[3IT ��j`
� SCALE:.
H-1
W/ CAOCAM4 W"USO
CON. 50tK WALL
MAMM WµL Wl r 0AW tM FM CC
NORTH
I CITY Or ITEM: �U(
k RANCHO CuCr�iVION' -
� TITLE= L,�►- t�..���. "�.a,,..►
PL ANNI1\TG DI),ISIO,N EXHIBIT: _jj�_ SCALE:
VALENCIA
AVENUE
C=
•. -�
LAM,
WEW&M
-. r..
PLANT MAfmiALs LEGEND
SY18oL
BOTANGA.to.W
COldMON,IAAE_
p qN
Mims
AKOlancrMOVa a+NA1wNAMi,'
KWq MIL.
wrtrJil A4QMf ►AIL
91CK7CtIA CAAW(pRFtAi
"maim
Y9RICJI{. t116071Fa101TEET7K�
MrALVF SCa XyLo1
M331wNlAYL
Y6unmevoLl 1KTKnIgTT"m
KOEWnsweRewr.
nAa mAFWA
CNPl76 HALM TM
WMAD" vc=uowym
Yaea HC
vrwiteN. evoloi®tTKE1e
SHFLSS
�'AUSIa►S�AAalA
UMffOVWWJA FAN PALM
Low ACCMFAw
Mn4asu&MrA'4VKtVAN(
LAMAINAwrmw"
Lwmimmmwg saws
CiiOGNDCOVFJi
AACfMECA CALDCUA WaR SHFIM CAPEWM*
nnmmoavmjx Am
-�-
AL umoo ALromttTI�
t CAM PURADAOC
CAiCAapq RCWE'AWOlI�t!!
•
1 *A&Toax
VM y
,cvt MAKA
CrAmpmm
EVC1mE1@1 P,AaSAq YfL
NORTH
I CITY Or ITEM: �U(
k RANCHO CuCr�iVION' -
� TITLE= L,�►- t�..���. "�.a,,..►
PL ANNI1\TG DI),ISIO,N EXHIBIT: _jj�_ SCALE:
E -E
P.
�w
1�
L
NORTH
CITY Or iTEm: Gtr
R.AN -CHO CUCAMONGA - TITLE:
E I NNIING DIVLSION E,YHIBIT- �_Kk`-E-__
85/324
0 'GORDON BRICKEN & ASSOCIATES
CONSULTING ACdUSTICAL and ENERGY ENGINEERS
ti
July 9, 1985
v�
MR. JOHN MELCHER
LEWIS HOMES
1156 No. Mountain Avenue
c ' l
Upland, California, 91786 < �
SUBJECT:. SUPPLEIIENT TO REPORT t3b/265 —� Lp PETI'T'E
ACADEMY -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
i Dear Mr. Melcher:
F-
V
We have been supplied with the revised site plan which
shows the play area removed from the northwest corner of the
site.
The noise contours are shown in Exhibit l without a
�. wall along Haven. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has adv3.sed
Mr. Howard Gilpin that it would not require a wall along Haven
for just the setback area between the building and the curb..
Inspection of Exhibit l shows a small area where the play
equipment is located to be in excess of ir5 CNEL. The six
f foot (61) high wall across the 20 foot setback
"on the north
side of the building would be adequate to protect this area.
If the play area were rer,oved, there would be no reason for
any wall, as all play areas would be below 65 CNEL.
The west wall. of the building will be exposed to noise
from 'Haven. To meet an interior level of 45 CNEL, as required
by the City, wou.'d require 27 dBA of noise reduction as the
1621 East Seventeenth Street, Suite rA Santa Ana, California 92701 ® Phone(714)835 -0249.
h,
t
noise level at the west face is 72 CNEL (72- 45 =27). On the
building interior', d o space is a large classroom. A calculation
was carried . out for the construction described in Table 6 0£
Report 85/265 with the exception that the glass was changed to
1 /8" movable sliders rated 5TC =23. The calculation is in
Appendix 1. The result is 27 dBA which is adequate.
Thus, the building should use windows rated, at least
STC =23 on all sides but the east side.
Thank you, and if you have any questions, please do not
hesitate• to call .
Prepared by:
�9sident
G Bricken
rr
/mm.
cc: MR.. HOWARD GILPIN
N, i. KNITTER AND ASSOCIATES
4242 Campus Drive
Newport Beach, California, 92660
jjf
KLJUM t$R1C1kr_1V & ASS0U1A I CM
CONSULTING ACOUSTICAL and ENERGY "tNGINEERS
SUMMA ,X OF REPORT
The analysis has been completed to determine the exterior
and interior noise exposure and the necessary mitigation measures
for the proposed .T.A PETITE ACADZMY project on Haven in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga.
5 A'detailed list of recommendations and requirements are
given in the following summary. Details are discussed in the
body of the report.
E
A. NOISE CONTROI� BY BARRIER DESIGN
A sound wall is required. The top -of -wall elevation
should be 1352, or alternately, three feet (3') above
street grade at th >l north end, four (4) feet above street grade
at -the center and Jive (5) feet above the street grade at the
south end. Placement should be 15 feet west of the west building
face. The south end should be wrapped around along the property
line to a point even with the west building face.
B. NOISE CONTROL BARRIER CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
The required noise control barrier may be constructed
using one of the following alternative materials:
�l (1) Masonry block
(2) Stucco over frame wall
(3) 1/4" glass or 1/2" LEXAN
F (4) Berm
(5) Any combination of these materials
it
4 1621 -East Seventeenth Street, Suite Santa Ana,California92701 a Phone(714)835 -0249
i
14
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PART II - INITIAL STUDY
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
DATE: -im �p
i-r�
AOL
APPLICANT:,`
'1 uu .s
FILING DATE: LOG NMMER: GLdP
PROJECT:
PROJECT LOCATION:AV��I +F 1bCr�.EGali. `S,P,J • 201 21_((
I. ENVIRMMNTAL IMPACTS
(Explanation of all "yes" and 'maybe" answers are required on attached
sheets).
1. Soils and Geolozv. Will the Proposal have
results significant in:
a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in
geologic relationships?
b. Disruptions, displacements, compactionn, or
burial of the soil?
C. ,Change in topography or ground surface .
contour intervals?
d. The destruction, covering or modification
c'f any unique geologic or physical features?
e. Any Potential increase in wind or water
erosion of soils, affecting either on or off
site conditons?
f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition?
g• Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud -
slides, ground failure, or• imilar hazards?
5. An increase in the rate of extraction and /or
use of any mineral resource?
2. Hyd_ ol- . Will the proposal have significant
results in:
YES MAYBE NO
✓1
Ae
-AC-1
1
Page"
2
j
YES MAYBE `0
a.
Changes in currents, or the course of direction
of flowing- streams,'rivers,
or ephemeral stream
channels?
b.
Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the
rate and amount of surface water
runoff?
c.
Alterations to the course or flow of flood
waters?
._ .act•
d.
Change in the amount of surface watex in any
body of
water?
e.
Discharge into surface waters, or any
alteration of surfac't water quality?
y�
f.
Alteration of groundwater characteristics?
.JC
g.
Change in the quantity of groundwaters,,
either through direct additions or wit % —
drawals,
or through interference with an
aquifer?
Quality?
Quantity?'
r
h.
The reduction in the amount of water other-
C
wise available for public water sinplies?
I-
Exposut;e of people or property to water
related hazards such as flooding or sei.ches?
3. Air q_ uality, Will the proposal have significant
results
in:
a.
Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile
or indirect sources?
Stationary sources?
b.
Deterioration of ambient air ; uality and /or
interference with the attainment of applicable
air quality standards?
c.
Alteration of local or regional climatic
conditions, affecting air movement, moisture
or temperature?
4. Biota
AMk
Flora. Will the proposal have significant results
in:
a.
Change in the characteristics of species,
including diversity, distribution, or number
of any species of plants?
t%
b•
Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of plants?
C
1
Page 3
YES MkYBE vG
c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of
plants into an area?
d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural
y
production ?,
Fauna. Will the - pFaposal'have.'significant results
in:
a. Change in the characteristics of species,
including diversity, distribution,
or numbers
of any species of animals?
b. Reduction of the numbers of arty unique, rare
or endangered species of animals?
C. Introduction of new or disruptive species of
animals into an area, or result in a barrier
to the mig,ation or movement of animals?
d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or
wildlife fidbitat?
S. Population. Will the proposal have significant
results in:
a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri-
bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of
the human population of an area?
b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or
`
create a demand for additionAl housing?
�_ `�•
6. 5ocio- Economic 'Factors. Wilt the proposal have
significant results in:
a. Change in local or regional socio- economic
characteristics, including economic or
commercial diversity, tax rate, and property
values?
b. Will project_ costs be equitably distributed
among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers,
tax payers or project users?
7. Land Use and Planning Considerations. Will the
Proposal have significant results in?
a. A substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area?
b. A conflict with any designations, objectives,
Policies, or adopted plans of any governmental
entitiea?
c. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of
existing consumptive or non - consumptive
recreational opportunittiees ?//
77
Page
q
YES
MIME NO
Aft
8. TranSDortation. Will the proposal have significant
results in
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular
movement?
b. Effects on existing stress, or demand for
new street construction?
C. Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking:
d. Substantial impact upon existing transporta-
tion systems?
e. Alterations to present patterns of circula-
tion -or movement of people and /or goods?
f. Alterations to or effects on present and
potential water -borne, rail, mass transit or
air traffic?
t
g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists
or pedestrians? —
9. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have
significant
results in:
a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological,
paleontological, and /or historical resources?
"
10. Health, Safety, and Dluisance Factors_ Will the
proposal have significant results in:
+R
a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazard?
b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? i-
c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous
substances in the event of an accident?
�.•
d. An increase in the number of individuals
or species of vector or pathenogenic
organisms or the exposure of people to such
organisms?
e. Increase in existing noise levels?
f. Exposure if people to potentially dangerous
4
noise levels?
AML
g. The creation of objectionable odors?
h. An increase in light or glare?
Page 5
YE :L4YSE NO
1L Aesth4tics- Will the proposal have significant
results in:
a. The obstruction or degradation of any
vista or view? scenic
a
b. The creation of an aesthetically
site? offensive
C_ A conflict with athe- objective of designated
or potential scenic corridors?
12- Utilities and Public Services. Will the
have a significant need for new s -tems, o=oposal
alterations
to the following:
a. Electric power?
b.. Natural or packaged gas ?'
Alt--
c- Communications systems?
d. Water supply?
e- Wastewater
vp
facilities?
f Flood control struct -fires? S
g- Solid waste facilities?
h- Fire protection?
i- Police Protection?
J. Schools?
k. Parks or other recreational facilities?
1- Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads and flood control facilities?
/
M* Other governmental services?
13. £nenzy and Scarce Resources.. Will the proposal
have significant
results in:
a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy?
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing
sources of energy?
C. An increase in the demand for development of
�o
new sources of energy?
d. An increase or perpPtuat -+ on of the consumption
of
non - renewable forms of energy, when feasible
renewable sources of energy are available?
I�
i3 4;
i
Page 6
YES MAYBE NO
e. Substantial depletion of.any nonrenewable or
scarce natural resource?
14. Mandatory Findings of significance.
a. Does the project have the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminat_ a plant or animal_ community, reduce
the number or rest - ct the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or Eliminate
important examples of the major periods of
C"ifornia history or prehistory?
b. Does the project have the potential to achieve
short -term, to the disadvantage of long -tazm,
environmental goals? (A short -term impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a relatively
brief, definitive period of time while long
term impacts will endure well into the future).
C. Does the project have impacts which are
Individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (Cumulatively considerable
means that the incremental effects of an
individual project are consi� <rable When viewed
in connection with the effects of past projects,
and probable future projects).
d. Does the project have environmental effects
Which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings,,either directly or indirectly?
II. DISCUSSION OF EMRON?4E4TAL EVALUATION (i.e., of affirmative answers to
the above questions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures).
AJIL t4 tan I t c ®� .tc �j `. % A t�,rs .1�s cCs
M%-T\ c p-rU-t , }► Les - -ri -dI-
LJJL _ C3az G�a�y�^ •12;�?-OF-
�+ � 4lp -Pt' .t*cztr.►� -10 �oc�- c,��p.�r gczDP�''C� -�`,t tap,ag
"6 j••(a6CT ��T �i4C.� esF $t�0ie.
j&v!,DwvL FCi.000 LA,4 . t4%4-
/is, .0 VZ4'ar'c►�4 e_lA - TtOrr UU t..
Page 7
III. DETEPJIINATIOV
On
the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect
on the
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECL&F.ATION will be prepared.
I kind that although the proposeYProject could have a significant
effect on 6-.e environment, thepe will not be
a significant effect
in this case because the mitigation measures
described on an
attached sheetChave been added to the project;. A NEGATIVE
DECLAMTION WIfL BE PPREPAkED.
EDI
find the proposed project ',4Y have a significant effect on the
envirnment,
and an ENVIROMENT IALpACT REPORT 1is required.
{
Date
i;
�u
Signature
Title
Aft
K
1
LA _PETITE ACADEMY, INC.
DIdntnndbdi', Cdllbrnld
,4_ Parking Analysis
I. Introduction:'
This parking study 'was commissioned- by La Petite Academy, Inc. to provide
the company with a'- realistic assessment of parking need; in jurisdictions
where parking guidelines are minimal or non- existent, znd to provide a
basis for appeal or request for variance in jurisdictions where parking
guidelines tend to exceed actual need as demonstrated by experience.
,i
It is of primary importance to insure that adequate parking fac'�'�liti.es
exist at each school, both for the convenience of our patrons, and to avoid
i,.terrupting normal traffic patterns on adjacent streets. However, this
must be accomplished with a view towards maximizing the efficient use of
available land. This study considers the experience of one school in
Southern California, The data collected rom that school have been
adjusted to acount for seasonal variations and anticipated increased
enrollment to pro4ect a worst case condition reflecting the maximum amount
z of parking that would be required at schools licensed for 120, 150 and 175
students.
II. School Profile:
Address: La petite Academy, Inc.
` 21385 East Cold Springs Lane
Diamond Bar, California 91765
Licensed Capacity: 175
Present Enrollment: 122
Average Daily Occupancy: 92 (Week ending Friday, March 29, 1985)
Staff: 13
III. La Petite Academy Operations and Student Population:
4 A. Staff to Student Ratios:
lThese vary by age accoraing to State licensing regulations; in
` California they are:
(t .Agee Ratio
{ 2 -5 :4
III 1:12
6 8 up not stated
La petite Academy's company guidelines generally exceed state
requirements, especial 11,, for older children. School staffing needs
can usually be,przdicted by assuming overall ratio of 1 :10.
Because this is a new school building enrollment, the present staff to
student ratio is artificially high.
B. S,tadant Population;
1. Full Day Students.
Infants, i—e- school -age children, and full day five year -olds
enrolled in !a Petite Academy kindergarten program.
2. Half Day Students:
Five year -olds enrolled in public school kindergarten programs.
3. School Age Children:
a. Those brought to the center b
from school by staff, y Parents then bussed to and
b. Those sent directly to school by parents then bussed to the
center by staff.
4. Part Time Students:
Those attending the center for two (2) or three (3) days a week.
C. L%perations:
I. Hours:
The usual daily opening and closing times range from 6:30 am to
6:30 pm. However, the school director may at her discretion
expand these hours in special cases.
2. Summer:
Most School age and kindergarten students are enrolled in the
school full time.
3. Busses:
The schools are provided with vans to transport school age
students to and from school and to take students on field trips
during the day. The number of vans provided to a school depends
on the nature of its student population. As many as three (3):
are used by schools with large school- age student populations..
These vans are assigned to selected staff members who drive them
home in the evenings and over weekends to prevent vandalism and
theft.
4. Meals:
All full day students are served lunches in the center.
Brealfast is served to early arriving full day students and
school age chf(dren w;ip are bussed to school by staff.
IV.
V.
1H
5, Arrival anti Departure Time in Center:
A survey of parents at four (4) centers in Kansas indicated that
arriving parents spent lese than five minutes in the center while
departing parents spent somewhat more than five lainutes.
Date: -
The data used to furnish the basis for this study were collected from
student sign -in /sign- outisheets and employee time cards for the week ending
Friday, March 29, 1983. Student arrival and departure times were averaged
over the week for each five minute incremental time pericd between the
hours of 6:00 am to 9 :30 am and 3:10 pm to 6 :30 pm. These were then
Plotted with staff arrival and departure times to form graphs shown In
Figures I and II. As indicated by 'the graphs maximum parking 'demand
occurred at 8 :30 am when the school was fully staffed with thirt46 (13)
teachers and seven (7) parents arrived with children. A total of twenty (2)
parking spaces were in use at'that time.
Analysis:
A. Seasonal Adjustment:
There are twelve (12) school age students presently enrolled in the
center who are sent directly to public schools and are later
transported to the center by La Petite Academy staff. During the
summer these students will be delivered to the center by their parents
and would add to the morning parking demand. Schoul hours vary, but
are usually scheduled to open at 8:00 am or 9:00 am. It may be
assumed that the additional demand will occur between 7:30 am and 8:00
am or between 8 :3G am and 9:00 am. Therefore, two (2) additional
parking spaces might be attributed to the 8 :30 am peak for a total of
twenty -two (22).
B. Predicted Parking Demand:
As previously mentioned, this school has an enrollment of 122 students
with an average daily occupancy of 92 students. La Petite Academy,
Inc. anticipates building schools licensed for 120, 150 and 175
students. Dividing those licensed capacities by the average daily
occupancy of the Diamond Bar school will yield a factor which ;nay be
used to project maximum parking demand for each five (5) minute
incremental student arrival time period. Those factors are:
Licensed Capacity Average Daily Occupancy Factor
120 a' 92 1.3
150 + 92 1.6
175 92 = 1.9 l
Multiplying the seasonally adjusted 8 :30 am stuOnt morning
parking load by the factor and adding the total staff parkinwi I
yield the maximum number of parking spaces required for a given
licensed capacity:
-8:30 am
Licensed Capacity Student eak Factor Staff Total
120 9 X 1.3 + 12 = 24
150
9 X 1.6 + 15 = 29
175 9 ,' X 1.9 + 18. = 35
YI. Discussion,:
Parking demand will vary from day to day and from' scfroo7 to school
depending upon the unique
requirements of our patrons. Factors affecting
the demand include: work schedules; driving time to
work; the nature of
services requested by parents; and the, "proportional makeup of the student
population with respect to ,age.. Because
the Diamond Bar-La Petite Academy
is a new school, a disproportionate percentage of the total 122
student
enrollment (85%) is represented by full time students arrivirl betwe46 6 :00
am and 9:30
am, and departing. between 4 :00 pm and 6 :30 pm. �s enrollment
increiases, students participating in part time or limited -
rarrams become a
more significant portion of the population. Furthermore, the student
of a
profile new school tends to be biased towards the younger more staff
intensive ages. Therefore, the projected parking demand based
on the
Diamond Bar school data should- be conservative, for as enrollment
increases, parking use will tend to be
more evenly distributed rather than
being added proportionally to peak damand periods,
However, 4n the unlikely event that a sche.1 should e', ;fence parking
problems, remedial
measures are avaiiable to allevia.dt them. Daily
: affing schedules anticipate student occupancy by as much as hour,
one and
uecause staff represents half of the parking use, peak demand may be
reduced by more rigorous
control of staff arrivals and departures.
I
n
G
■ 1
_ A
t- f-I
_ T � - !•t�1- Q- -• I
F! -,T
Tt
}u --
LT
IL
-� � i _}. � A t' —�y� � fit_ }'_i• l .�. _�. L. `_ s �._.�•- —
S ri �l`il iS37�c1 �l�kJ1\1f�t21'� ; 1{ I(
1 -i.-
��l � r... l —1 i_ lM:. _( 1, , :4�1 i..{ _�• I ; ? i ( { —t r
IV
LL
1 � � — �-- -�--•i a .� --I- . —�.._ i.-
_r_ - __� . �-- �"'"j' -►�-= . �- � .��_' �_M ` .fix
r
tl
,
t.
RESOLUTION NO.
Aft
A RESOLUTION, OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING CCmMISSION
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 85 -09 FOR A DAYCARE
FACILITY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF iHAVEN AND
VALENCIA IN THE'MWUM RESIDENTfAL DISTRICT WITHIN THE
TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY Y
a`
WHEREAS, on the 29thi day of May, 1985, a complete application was
filed by Knitter & Associates for review of the above - described project; and
WHEREAS, on the 24th day of July, 1985, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning
Commission held a pubic hearing to consider the above - described project..
NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resol*" as
follows:
SECTION t: That the following findings can be met:
1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General
Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and
i� the purposes ^° the district in which the site is
located.
2. That -the proposed use, together with the conditions
r applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety, or welfare, or materially
injurious to properties or improvements in the
u' vicinity,
3. That the proposed use complies with each of the
applicable provisions of the Development Code.
S
SECTION 2: That this project Will not create adverse impacts on the
environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on July 24th; 1985.
SECTION 3: that Conditional Use Permit No. 85 -09 is approved
subject to the following conditions:
PLANNING
1. A sound wall or barrier to the specificat.ons of the submitted
acoustical study is required between the building and the
Aft northerly property line. The desigr3 of this wall barrier shall
be consistent with the architecture for the project and shall
be detailed on the final landscape plans.
AMk
' ` t:
Planning Commission Resolution
Page #2
2. Windows with a rating at least STC =23 shall be used on all
building elevations but the east side.
3. Approval is continger.`. upon the approval of a Minor Exception
1
for parking.
4. Perimeter wallHdtaining wall treatment as proposed along north
property Line is satisfactory. provided area is attractively
landscaped with ',• cascading shrubbery /ground cover., and climbing
vines.
5. The design 'of the Haven Avenue and` Valencia Street parkways,
including both sidewaik'and landscaping, shall be coordinated
with the overall master design, plan of the Terra Vista
Landscape Supplement.
ENGINEERING_
1. Tract 12590 shall be recorded.pr or to issuance of a building
permit in order to recognize Lot 32 i, a legal lot.
2. Storm drain 8 -1 of the Master Plan of drainage for Terra Vista
shall be constructed prior to occupancy.
3. Developer shall coinstruct all street improvements on Valencia
Street including 18 foot pavement on the south side of the
median island adjacent to the proposed project.
APPROVED AND .PDOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF JULY, 1985.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
,
BY:
Dennis L. Stout, Chairman
ATTEST:
Jack tam, Secretary
I, Jack Lam, Secretary of tha (Manning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 24th day of July, 1985, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
Ni34S: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERSr
r.
O
Z
U
QJ
O
i
d
o� n �o v"i. s.uL
_ F
6. Y n E N 6
OOAS.TO Aa- O` L O.c� Y�6 A9 OLELG
1-a3 c
'C,A•..y ° d G ♦i^a O 2' r O` C
^. E aL .^U 00• .,.0 L Y� Oa
2'C
o= v o W °o�
Yo L •n
E
C
+oc,.e 2a�c•' a.` € m� ozY+�. qL � o u m ; a�- � €y •°••�
r a em °n rota .tea° YZ °c o. qo
NEE NA U:CLYgC.
ACm U9 A TCa U. yC„A•C Rn c €Ol ^gg yn9p ONTEC,•
o
^ 9Cd�0 OO^ 6agd Ru � dC�V6}I
q^r� aa'Ci LC a
Ca ^�.�. Om b pL.m O•n> EE�.�O YEG L° 'i w0•
CA X0.6. BYO >�O, O 4A AE LOgg N.QY. j�
Y O ~� L •COQ EQ."� .
AaV O a
O L ^ d N T N V N L<
yVVy OCx LOY ~�0 d~ Y UVN OA c •�
LmA Z Z L N
N O>�°, O.^W E ..YCCwY 9Y NuVV 6~n t•.pY
d' ao2N t:; '.9 1-OCaN N Y�L 6Y 6V.
a:v °w
■I
J
W
O
Ono
00 ^.ULCE
7E
W
to
°uAa
`o
He
H
r
_,F
@ pn
u y m e
2 N
J
•�
W
a
^ L
R ^JQy
O 2
C
C O O O
A O Y o t
d J
u H
00L
d. O
n p T
'
E t
A
zN
■I
116xxnn
W
0
Z
4
U
c
•n
S_
L
d
IH
a
Na c. drnN.ct
qL>._u 1°p 2.5 �-, ..
o ,Y i e
a of 'u^ Ya y =inn �.'o '^�boE °L`oa
o
yA
lig
6> y d p E' G u O' G O C O A d Y na y O N -5Z . E. ` L
fi�q may^ L q yE= G
_Z; S, °'u ��^ G3n ac ^N 2TU uqG
pE.�OL Gds qIp W.9.� �c `YEC ��� GiYA
N L`
Y. nY 6 UY Cd ^U L^ ^w n00 ...dT ]y Cn
�E�aO „d•• V 7 r '016 aE
u d �
a= d^ go Yod d goo dqn y €dN
k �EE Y E C G F
Zm 00.22 O >OG °AqN jOaa+O� UN qugY° SLY. 5EC. �.
,oM'ar3yy.L °° ! °on .Y- r.d� at° CGn ceY-a N. Ei
C �A� Eo
H L y N.^ O u
L 6 'L� �1 . N ^ a 9 ^^ L A Y d
d€ N� raN dcN.. Lc-.
Lddd ��N 4 °00 d Zr n0 V q V .+ q
C °
qM d9N YOa d ^ +O AC �C Un °Y ^O V.
rE °^ N Gr 9p Otd O'O^ Lnoo.raa e• �� ca c0
O'-.L �N nM y LGTN
Y
°..v'^ 4A.'^ qa Y� E
4 ' O n Urn d W G E.. t N L N L w 7 9
o
qp 5G «GC. E MN GLO.dp a d. �'e
qN Vr°-
N Y` L E G T A C y O u o N a V y .� d G Y d p q L O� CI q ♦+
y 6
�C C O
n9s. Lq.2r OC.O CL°Y+ GNr'{1d3 Q.O. �no� rL QLk
m
j., m w L o
-
W
�
d
I
O1 q
ms
aENZ
�`q"
C
n
C q
G N C E L G }
i
N
M'
L
OOH
n N
x o o
4G.
Y
°
,sy YY�
L
w
o=
n
e ;
Y
A
C
'
a d
C y A OO p N
4
m h
p
�
it
d
LL
't
d
C
o
E t p
9 p
mon ''5 R5
C
W
n
CI
^
q
r
q q 0 a n�
aZEE
o
qo
SAM
eL. 4= N g w G U
A
C
W r F
m u
'l�
O.
w�
G
J
•'
q'
N� m4
N
qqJ
qqJ
E
\ I
I
I
I
,�+ ^
^ o y� c
c a >• d G
G d >, .sj N° c u
u.- a >. a Qd Y
Y e
e � `o s
s G -
E dO. N
N O
4 L
L N N •
Q+•° •
•z
°O
C. L
L yU g
g D V d d
d
.•�` C
VN O
O14'ro 4
4LVCd0 L b
VaV O.y
OYtO d
rq •ai q
q+.
NE V
t}V. O
d r
4J V
V OOL V
V Y •
•°
m0 t 4
4.CY, d
d N
NO
-n u
ug
V U'N Q
Q N3G EN^q' y
y6 qN Q
Q OL Y
Y L 6J .
.O `„
e. S. x
x V1.
eJ
t]'U d
Gin
g2 0 L 4
4 N x
x V C dL O N
N V ^ a 4
4 6 u d 6
d «Na G
p
otsC N
N ae £
£O 4NtOyp L
LLC�CLV�dO G
GOU^ L
LL
qjW E
E �C $
NVL p
? =M >
O .y Sxggi.. O
OM
3Q Tp °
°•°La`�v V
Vuq n. �wu F
F9 T .'O. _
_... -
-L C.N
N C
CgidY EQ q
qM�� Yo ny F
F qN EE Tait O
O}i4VN °
° Y
Y
�Gq-L t
tyiN »
OF VaG•N p
N ONN C«.rG6 T
OT q
C'
v I
r 9 69 •O u S °� � J� u .d: � C i n O Y O V C y
4Q ' NO �= iQ 6Y M T.Ed OOq =. u2,L KL UQC�1
L N E O N _ O 4
%Zz t°. L - n �.IG E
S G� V on N LA U.L O GE U.yQ Y.M. ^T C. NNYK.
✓ B E N q U Y q V �� a � u q 0 9 g N d
YNr> UYp V O�L.d Y c c �U �:E S Ga OL. ..a M1jQU �R.x.Y W
O a N y ti C z d Y
_ Op�E4
yY C)O Ob TpQ LAY �6 FW O.OyN °GT vG ^CQ l+O�dG
.. a�rY UOY NCO ° Cd F •,;,,Oqq H �4� q•G^Na
`se a ad
r6xL dq Y t axi E.GO- 26 o YNOL4iy
N Y 9 NS GaO+Vf+gi. Y = 1 4 y 3 C aQi t g O1� °.PLC.^ y
6—Y
+0•rQ V y•" qV yWA � C 4Y G9p4WL VNt�Y °EGiq
a r t° L q O q � T y e �� U bi Q•Q G Q. F U Y c =+ N
JINN L� qY NY3 «rU 7..G. L 'O 4GLdLrgNQ FTyG`E °. V:C ^y
pvt' � d4 a Y iG -N > V
d6 O� Qb �.5.• -�N V yyU.' fi G60 b. 9C•GOG RA �Y�LMy
CutL j2� L� C`LC CLO So 2
� °i u C VOQ�d Up��OL
J N OOO A _
ootnE.. Ewa a� «.� E FN mS c °u. GY a'1L wu NNq GIGO^•.. 1'G- .a.a4°+
ado. ^9
I- a C:E d Mq ib OO
d O Y U n
E °
.-.V E L Q ...y 2 gA.- 4dQ ULn Od4aY° V°, *r6
4•v p.CS �NT.a HL NO °q K�Na N4q 4U J «9 pd +oY p1� L
yrY .Y N F q A A K b 6
.pi N 4 H
aomo
�o
a
c
owaogrtn diA.°,
cum °• c�
F>-LV 'I
r
�C
V
Af
gl�e�6�0~ UC
qL��O !
E.UOL
a <qrn Om Er L
LdV
EOvi
`�r•N
Yx
°`
Opu
^^�~ �yNNO
O
ELL.y �• t
1
Y O
yOiy CO
V
Uy�Y
Q L}
Y
L
yA �
L• q Q`
N
q r
N 2
C
T
VN
d<
q. °d •c ..So-
'•p N q'
+
uqw
.9..9
s�L`
�'°•
v'•-
'o"S
Vie°. 01pN UL,d
yN� v
a
C.0
+•^
^q=
App'
°'
_
a-
ad
n
u
A
°°'
.'Z
u
,•
LG
L•�.r.'O
u°
YO
tO
OtC
,Newf
dM
< n ea
<CLy
� A Et
g.
a
O qL O 0
d A
d C
T
Y
°
L°
e.
N�NQ.
^ZL �N L,Y,.�• y
i NM Y..
N
9Ym'
U
CN T
EyM
dq 0
•VL+vy" ^
>A
O tT
N
O t
stlN
L N
�O
cy
dN
j N 6Y L'OO wO ± °N
.O LN?V x3
+N+�p
GdP
-a- 'z
i
a�
° 9 v
qV LY
O
V
'IY
O
Ley
Nd
Egg d
YV 01N
N
t
K
°
=
-o. v-
9N
01da
`4Gy
L6
Ob.O
a
^Ad
MUY
Yd � p�
CY i
.D'd.V Yd Ldu-- r
O�LN YJy
M ,O:y
A.tL .
n 00°.z
G q!\p
. c
o .
X-
o° '^ oq
L
E.
Ec
d L
N L ^v C ^>>
c
H�NAH
Gx�
ACM
3 NU
F`NL
6:tV.0 ^e.. p�> p.A N p0 4 A. •ir-OS 6iF
L
t44 nN S
M
1
^ N
Y
32,
C q0� ^nO
plc O.�E
>ba t:Ad
Wa c
.-
Y �
N v e a
>,i .°+
s
.L+ $ _ a a. L
Y t. ° a"'
aoi'..n'. •' a.
N
c
a x at
LUC
a�
.°..�
qq
CY
yY
^ mN LC
� qO. y�
Y�=Cd
>NN
�qa
aT
c
� Y
oq
r t°. a.iy
Lq Ync
oY •CYn
L vw
dYV �.qti
Y
o
ca
•°;.Zv
r
f=
s'r c
.n
d qa Ngv
_C
t' <°
`A u
a
M
emu°
v ode.
cS ^
o �r
9Y ^Y>
Lied °�i
— 15
a
W
3
C
w
�^3.
Y a
oT
,a n`w-
9
N Y 6
g y
C
99
L N d
Z.
L O
Z 4 Z a
Yid
q4- ou•°c
•:y u
.-:
uv,o
u v` '°a cd
�� �Ly.0
i� o'uY
to
V L O
-
W.
a O
L Y W
q73
NL
q 8w cg
9y
u N
uo
—M
d
Y..>.
V
K
V V
aw y
aN L L
aA
O• J.
Nq NE pt
t
O w
C
C p
�Ap
L
YC C
w C
o..v. Gt
+nq CY V
ata a �6<
L N O
0 �' Vt°d.
Lc «
p M q
y•- u
a cce uz
.. N
^u =4
4uN0
•-uS
<At�.
z
?
Eu
QqN
Vem
F6°
•+N y
dU 4b !-0 Cq
LOe
NN d °
Gp6 +^�On
°n'y
«y A`aL
W6 OO
H-21 W
0
Z
U
m
•n
L
n.
• G
E
v
N d
vi
�E
t O
C C
°u^
^ m
N a
a�a
? Gin
E m.Y
UDC
d 49
1! C UL
U A A
p cs�L
�• ua
¢L'v
N.^OY TC
E��.•L. dG q
r �
Y LL u L L L B
u6s.0 '•E wt°i
ailh v LYT
c Y C S Y i C
u L - q
9 =qu MSC
C« u C M d N
�inA � Yo
c ^go No°
a u c u U v
�C•E O.G A^4
L N w
C�W«yL «C1�
.eu u•_° o�L
Y q
_ >S
yOA •Q. N �1
YCO u
♦i O
QCE� L UCa
uv� o Nu,o
3lY.Hp rA�
NI \I
°m .Yew
LO
Y
«
�L•]
q
vw L
a
Yq
qC
v �sq
o+aN
ox L
oo,e
C E
ca
Yeti
�^
N Z
A O
d T
qva
q�sm
•tL °a
°`
G�
a
vY u.
G
e
L
y
wx d
Y
^qL
v C
a
,a=c •
yV.�OO
A nom•
.OUr OI
GNM
V
E o
YidC
> ^
agmo
uc 'u
aq'c°'
iMa
2-E '°
aLit0
aq
Y Tali
u v
.C.C.
.
ELN
Tam
ya'cN
u +.
rav
°omw
aqL
rON•,.
n A
L
L
v °qY.
q d
Nw
U
•.. i
CY�n
OcY Rol
a4
v ° • .: NtL lY• r
6 E E q E
.i° ;; .�`. •• oaa ..A. ^Edn� 00
�ti
f Rt dY IS. � . C9tC
d O u G W M .G d Y EE G • y
gwrN WO�LU Y'O qua U
uULE4 nO Aai CYY•� O ..�•.L
=V.p« wOvu Y agEaC C>i q..
LO>N EEY �N .:�Oa cdu
na Yr 3 O.0 C.T O AY Tt•. q u
UytL. Yq c•
ac
4-_- -. L.N.•9 O L N u E d W L�
E varn L�TU ai c° +e nuA ^°
I�UWL 6�pa1�N d ^NVO N L.UC
1
G tr \l Nj p \� \jI 1d;�
� { W
S wq
euB
ac
LO
Y
«
�L•]
'Aa
u
Yq
qC
n
L
e
n.cn L'
.• o
mo
i^
a
u.
O Y G
V
4v
C
4
w
��
qV m
C
iS.
07 Y«
• ^.N Cn
Ga
MZ
aLa•
nL
.C.C.
.
ELN
�LLyM
ya'cN
iA
V
A °
aqL
rON•,.
n A
L
L
v °qY.
q d
Nw
U
•.. i
CY�n
OcY Rol
a4
x q4.
q.°•
�.
qVN
�yye.
_ T
c.0
rn
cgi^
y
iu
Nso
o °4
9Ta
o
txM
�Cd
L ^�
06
L
d1rLL
^YL
E'
n
C
LL
qw.t
Nso
un nN
u °
Ls
qcw
ov @�.
Q
u« V
czf
�I
a
yC
Op 'Y00
L N E
EYW.
G
U 9
`
4 r ^.
uv
AIL
rpi'NE
Z�OYQr.
Y44
q
q N
T
Ftl
vo
>C
�
�Lp.
OqR
Vum
F^
a V
GpGb „.
YYN
fir'
,n
iV=
Or.
�YLY40
yY ,LiC1i
O LOy
_E b"C.
`
IC
c
G c�d�
d:,, Yii
Yid
y2.0
Er'C Aa`
7ZW
9T.G
G
u P
^RN
Y Y
a Y
Atl
R q '
C
E _ c
Y
r o
a
vop
p'c n.
^
w� T.
>
=c
•° -•GUS
o u L E
Lbt Q�• :600 WL
c.-
b�L
u.m�
u 40.v u4 rna
o
aT�uuii
ei.
Lc
c+
OO
Y
v as
a
�ti 4�
uC
L
I Y C
L�°,
p8
QL0 '
W
>
G
OQ�W
C•w
i fJ
4 ."=�
KpR44
V
¢YY
W
J
I
7
ply
v
Y
q:€
N
LR
b v
V9
J
C e y
w^ L
m O\
Oaa Y
^ p
^
N
2 b4
C^
.'
L Lp
K
tOR
Y
"vgNC.
=ate ip
�afii
<
a
4. O
b o
r rna
rf '
��
C
tea!
uj
ybY
N� Yd
1 M 4
AFC
ZOIS 4..N
1'
Lpppp
dO
O Y�
C�Nt6dOq
O� °V
'O CC. q1
L �a
CriOl ap+>„
au
uE Y�
Ji
T b
p
Rte.
Y°..
Ob LM
Y -q
NYp =r`
74
R ^9'
60 i
OL ^O.
pNC
E -tl N.YL
WbbfiLl
^W
N�Cp�
NN
n2 Y-0
a0
qO Q4
u�
GR .a
YWRRpu
°O
�b OY
��b
qTy>
Cyn
dab0
NV .p..
6
�9
°YR_O ^q
iN
A
Of
.^�
CY
O
AV -ZS
NOp
d C D
r 6
•
'GE
Qip
qu
CL'^
L
NW b4
�qU
WL y
Y.
NVaN'r.
i s0
OCw Er.�w,`_.
WNa
AYpO
L
,c
C,1
Nu OL
M�
ooD OL Ep
d
Ld �
d �
9-C
gg
I
Y,
o
U
O
d a Upz
Gy
E
^
L�paNi O.y
V
to
Yq
C�
iLATU
9
C
of
M9N
d
Ny
o e
U
QJ
.Yqp
1 ai
u�
p
V
EE�p qq
A
C
6.1L EST
��
UrLC'^
LUpyg
GL Y
� C
U
NV
W
5—m O, p
d
L
�.� L
u
'oi �q.
. -�p•`o
��. � Oo^ _ �_.
�'i in
ijj bnu
a. �i �y
o
tuLL C
,d,, u
LaaY
'°.�, u•L Ric
NL)�° y�a�
'TS q N
rn v C
No$"t.0
a V YV 01
°
b
= L
N C
i ngdia
N N.l
yqE Li �Nd
L
a &u
'
N`d. -cam
Si
a G
6
N.yW 1Ca�
66NM
VIOrM 6v�
'�
%L� V W�
W.+NLLti
Sp.R
b
f�
Oi R H
ti w
H
H r
N
LW
OV
T1-1
d
M
YLr.V 9y
S
dq ZG
pE
a
vT
ts o
Gq�6 OM
n.�.r
�w
�(
J`
��
.°O
d
L a`p't•`,•
N LuE
io
i
�C,VL^O. vv
4
�
EE ruap
V C YE
C p`
L
�(
L y
O
O
G= G`
C.C.
77-.
•'
'l
I
2 qL
qQ. d
i,a cv�
o
UO1am N`
oa
U2
Ot C
T 66
i
C
O a.Vp
N
N qad
€.`
�p c
<O• W S
J Z.
U MC Q+ lip
y
6
G
G
A«
yL
c
o
C n Ya
+•u
A w
Y
_
�d
a.Y
d
n
dC
a _
�
..suN
yy
Cw-
•
E
o u
�
a°+
✓E
v
�
¢
...
r t
°o
AW ~}
N A
f e.
n
T
•pa0
y
°.
N
^Y
i L o ♦
"w •.La
M N
Y
lu
r9
... �'.0
n
t
• L
i
+n°o
F L
S�
na
Co
G V
d Y :. 4 N O .•Li
a
cu
N aY
a w
o,
e9
IN IN
...Ly
eNO•
`-�
C
o
aq
..
'!�Y '.
v
A2N
• NY
OSm =
rL �N
Y �L Y >paC
NA Ne ZqY
Y� La LV.•• N��°•
N
a
A Y • y 4,
Y.
q9
yC w
Ons
� ,SF:.� �Y�
.O
>>
Ou GYA OLY'
iEi �Y iN.
`y
4N Yam
`uVN' j
•C •'i
LO •� (!
4. 4r
qp6`n
�� Y� > O q 4� N
»' O � C�•N
L AY S
� Y. 6 �C G
O
��
L•AJU�
.
_I
a` \I
`NI
( \n \l
l \ \•I ` { \•I 1,nI
Y N
I+j
1r
M O O i
C
O�
O
M •Y
O
O
T�
u
.DL pN
L
•O ,
N
n =
a
f
N @Z
N�
!
L
o
LdL. n
a+ q
C
M
.,
w. A
rug
u
Q
m`c.
uw
Oa
t
n„•,
a
�
c
o c
I- dy
Y
�
L
Ot
LL
p4
qC
YA
e`!e
Y
n gco
O6
cuo�{ .4.n o'L c. mi
LYG Y Mir C
400 A
�
�i
i
N
_�
O~
P!„!
+■+...
L~ C�
L� Ou
.9
�O
•C..
S404
1--4�
�j
K 6N �C N j ZC O
.. 2�
rM •
6aa ! E
U
Ic
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA AOMA "Al
Al
STAFF REPORT
4 O
DATE: July 24, 1985
TO: Chairman :and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Jack Lam, Corqmunity Development Director
BY: Bruce Cook, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85 -18 - HIGHLAND COMMUNITY CHURCH The establishment of a church in the Rancho aza Fopptng
Center, at 6642 �3rnelian, generally located at the
northwest , corner of 19th Street and Cartelian Avenue APN
201 - 811 -60.
I. PROaECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action .4euuestei_ Approval of a Conditional Use Permit
B. Existing Land Use: Ranch,) Plaza shopping center
C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
North - Tacant flw Residential)
South - CoiunerciL: Center (Neighborhood Commercial)
East - Von's Center (Neigiftrhood Commercial)
West - Single Family Residential (wjw Residential)
D. Genaral Plan Designations:
ro ect ite - Neig orhood Commercial
North - Low Residential
South - Neighborhood Commercial
East - Neighborhood Commercial
West - Low Residential
E. 5 °.e Characteristics : Existing Neia,.borhoed Ccmmercial
s opping center. Two cf the primary tenants are Bob's Big Boy
restaurant and Radio Shack.
F. Project Oetails: 'The is fog the use of an existing
'Fe—tail l unit for a church ofi "ice and Sunday worship services.
Office hours are from 7:30 a.m. to 5 :00 p.m. Sunday morning
worship takes pace between 9 :00 a.m. and 12:00 p.m. Worship
services are attended by between 50 -70 persons. Counsel
meetings and the like take place weekday •sights from Y :30 p.m.
to 10;00 P.M.
G. bA22 iicable Regulations; Churches within the Neighborhood
Comm,rcia center are a permitted use subject to the granting
of a Conditional Use rarmit per C -9 of Table 17.10.030 of the
Development Code.
ITEM41 ,j,
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 85- 18MIGHLAND COMMUNITY CHURCH
July 24, 1985
Page 2
o�
II. ANALYSIS
A. General: The church has been operating without a Conditional
Use Pi-, mil: since approximately February. As a result of code
enforcement, the Church i� Tyr :w seeking a CUP on a temporary
basis only. Flighland Ccrmavnity Church, the applicant, owns
property one blocky to the Borth and plans to develop a
permanent facility (CUP 84 -22) on this site wi�:hin the next
months. This use operates during the off hours of the major4.ty
of the 'busines. s on the site. To this point, te church's
operation has not resulted, in an) conflict with any other of
the existing businesses.
B. Technical 'review Com:." tee: The Technical Review Committee hei
recommerded approval subject to the installation of panic
hardw&re and granting of a permit for public assembly by the
Foothill Fire District.
C. Environmental Assessment: This project classifies as a Class i
Categoric Exemption and, tt•yrefore, is not subject to the
rr-irements of the California Environmental Quality Act
:%_ ^-;'QA).
III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the
Development Code and the General Plan. The project wi11 not be
detrimental to adjacent properties or businesses or cause
significant environmental impacts. In addition, the prcposed use
together with the recommended Conditions of Approval are 4-1
cc-npliance with the applicable. provisions of the bevelopment Cote
and City Standards.
IV. CORRESPONDENCE_ This item has been advertised as a public hearing
in The Dai Re ort ne,,spaper, notices were sent to all property
owners within JUU feet of the project site, and notices were sent
to all businesses within the center.
V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
consider all material and input regarding this project. If the
Commission concurs with the findings ant! • inditions of approval,
adoption of the attached Resolutior.
Resp ctfull s9mitted,
yr
o-f
Jack Lam''..
Commurity Development Director
JL:BC: jr
n ;,l
rL. -, KING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 85- 18l0IGHIMM C014MUNITY CHURCH
MY 4, 1985
Page 3
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Land U`se
Exhibit "B" - Zoning
Exhihit "C'' - Site Plan
ExhilYit "9'` Floor Plan
Resalbticn
w
�f.
. .............. .............
0 .................
...... . ......
..
..................
........
........ ....
..............
... ........ . ........
...............
........... ..........
.. .........
. ...... .....
................
I ..........
:B ........... . .. .........
.............
MIM
M ® eeeee IrAw
WMM ® ZAe
.Base Line
:cl
LY
R
E.........
Y--f r,*
.. ... ......
:rpm
'001
v X,
U
n...........
Goif
nurse urse.
........... It
r-V
NORTH
Fl.
CITY 01, �e, f p . i
ITFA,I- u
RANUH0 CLTCAMoiNGi' TITLE:
LANININU DIMISKAN
"AP
SCALE-
ecsa^- 'aaaa' r 1 Ilk-
cam= _st
FC
-; -• � . fl 7 ,- X
1=
os
i MH !I
LM
NC
f!
Os,, L '
N URTH"
Criy OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA. TITLE:
r PLANNING UIVIROM
, b.x K. war• _ %S.SOM(i f: ✓... ' — �_
V••_ it 1 . • 1 31
>. _ 1
�" `�-�{ \ � � \'yam •+ •- •.: = I -' � ; 1 1.. r 1 . ( = �.: .
j} Via• I .� _ J °JiLkF3aI
__.. _�.— ._....._ _. _..j �__ -� OIL .N t': 1G •I '•f
CITY OF ITEA4: GcrIF �,5 -,tS
RAN 0 CLTCAM- ONGA TITLE-
PLANNINTC, DIVLSI(.IN EXHIBIT- " �SCALE --
t
Y
1
-1 i- - - -�
_ OFi\ =E PCER
0
�i
NORTH
CITY OF
ITEivi
RAN -CHO CUCAMONGA
TITLE-
PLANNING DIVISIO,�t
EXHIBIT. '• t7" SCALE.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION'_OF THE RANCHO C1ICAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVING CONDITIONAL_ USE PERMIT NO. 85 -18 FOR A CHURCH
AND RELATED OFrICES LOCATED AT 6642 CARNELIAN IN THE
NEIGHBCRHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT ,f
M
WHEREAS, on the 4th day of June, ig85, a complete application w,
filed by Highland Community Chprch for review of the above- described project;
and
WHEREAS, on the 24th day of July, 1985, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning
Commission held a public hearing�to consider the above- described project.
n'
NOW, THEREFORE, th, Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolW as
follows:
SECTION 1: That the following finding; can be met:
1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General
Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and
the purposes of the district in which the site is
located.
2. That the proposed use, together vith the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the
puNlic health, safety, or welfare, or materially
injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity.
3. That the proposed use complies with each of the
applicable provisions of the Development Code.
SECTION 2: That Conditional Use P.-,rmit No. 85 -18 is approved
subject to the. following conditions:
PLANNING DIVISION
1. Thus approval shall expi, e, unless ex.ended by the
Planning Commission withtn twenty -four (24) months
from the date of approva`.', and shall becone void
upon a change of ownership, or the use ceases,
2. The site shall be developed in accordance with the
approved plans on file in the Planning Division, and
the conditions contained herein. Prior to any use
`
of the project site or business activity beina
1
commenced ';hereon, all conditions of approval shall
ba completed to the satisfaction of the Cit- yam{ a[ nner
and Building OfFicial.
J
F
Resolution No.
CUP 85 -18
Page 2
3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance
with all sections of the Development Code and all
other applicable City Ordinances in effect at the
time of occupancy.
4. Any signs proposed for this Conditional Use Permit
shall be designed in conformance with the
Comprehensive Sign Ordinance and shall require
\ review and approval by the Planning Division prior
to installation of such signs.
5. If the operation of this church causes adverse
effects 'upon adjacent businesses or operiotions -, the
Conditional Use Permit shall be brought iWore the
Planning- Commission for their consider0 -ion and
possible termination of such use.
6. Public assembly or large group meetints (50+
persons), shall not commence until such time as all
Uni;orm Building Cude and State Fire Marshall's
Regulations have been complied with. Prior to
occupancy, plans shall b6 submitted to the Foothill
Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety
Division to show compliance. The building shall be
inspected for compliance prior to occupancy.
7. the building may be used for public assembly and
group meetings only during the weekend and after o
6:00 p.m. on weeknights.
8. Preschools or schools are not permitted by this
permit; however, this shall not preclude nurseries
or Sunray School.
FIRE DISTRICT
1. Panic hardware' shall be installed on the back
door(s)`by September 1, 1925.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24th DAY OF JULY, 1985.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Dennis L. Stout, Chairman
ATTEST-
Jack Lam, Soc ;tart'
Resolution No.
CUP 85 -18
Page 3
I, Jack tam, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Coimmission he'd
on the 24th day of July, 1985, by the following vote -to -wit:
A
AYES: COMMISSIr)XERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: ,OMMISSIONERS:
.�
MuLYY YOLY�>
p Ldy
xOO K'
rd
Vr��CY
xCGYU
D.A�
.,
•"CAy9Qp EM
V
O•.r xA @y"
Rr. it l
p aV9 A^
0. .Tn
Uy
A
q� 4U
L E
0.L E
yM
V o L�- T
WL O�
N
L
0. A
6� tNx rnU
a ,.��'
m.0.
01
o
u
2Td
N.
Ad °U
p E�O.Y C�
a
U Oa
C
E•a
1
L`V
Cr Y.
LW
a
O
Y
.r.,nuaia iYM
�Eh °V d
E'c
'v ^ci
L p°0
CA
oL.9-
wod�o
vw°••G°X
`'O.•d�
�a�a
°,oT eE
•
.i
09 A
O C u E
=�NUO.G
o O
Y C.
Y
Ec
G q^
Y
9du
Us O'
�.r. r ~
12Y O >.O.atj
L
A
A.Y
^s
jj EE
E`94Yd
G.
ti '2.^ t °ni onq
`Q„�su °ale
to. J•oL. ID.N
Oe�
aM
.a'c o>
°cow
c•°a °r.
a p
NLO
Z iO LKV�
L E n li A�
°°
CO
a
q.0
nN L
�W des
22 Oia
o
U
A
OL
x p
"•
y
C
�Y
„EN
u
Lt�.�OHyU
yWyL9
i+
OWN ¢ ^�
A�3
Gd4 In. Od. •�
v
dG'Cdi.T
aA>
uiE °yux
xncy
LLLe�. >L
you
D
a
dr Y..5 Y.
oc
FF
:mo.
Y
Ur.
C «^
u
6 Y1:1
6�YRp�;NLA=r
^ 1�OD N
d
CYO
C N�O.==S.
QG Am
1�C 6t 6V
p
m
V
I
z
W
D
iQd C'
C
i
N
H
O
1
N n6p pp
G J
w
�U M
O
Y'OaTCN pL
P
LL
N�. y.
v
°
.>
•"CAy9Qp EM
V
O•.r xA @y"
-�'t
t0 �
6E�ZYII j'jy
0. A
x
C x p.E
ti
V
L
N
Ax
WCy.Y ^Y.y O
'�•. r�
�O 4.
6N
S
pp �y=q
aTO.•.ZO VO.+Q
q °
x'
y
Ly,AOAL °Ca
�•u
C ��
�.r. r ~
i P
O n�.•Ei �M U W y
C W
aA L. = y
u0 N li i
o >oo
u u
A s dEO°
a p
N•.
Ml >Ya3 O. 4
w F-.A
'6.x Nw
EE
-Z xt .°..x.
x_16
rl
�t
r.°+ ✓�
nAa
p1s
✓q v
cY
qc °L v °
��.
`� ..
ld �."..
_
°e «A
EY VC F�EP. c
CC
F ^E �
L
O n
� ✓v]u
9
ro
„w
LL.
aY„a
YnN^
VMY✓
o ✓N �gn YZO
�.�Nm
moo= b
4
•iiNn.
n
AA
�' dFai�
�Ir
D
w1OEY
r4MCGO.NC
«
=7;=,
b YO «.
Y
y
yEVY
ODa ro
C�
R q
Y +-db°i
nu
B�EV
Y»
-o1
L O a O
n> pp 2
aC �.NEVVCy y'
L
SF »
�D`q
..2
oU�T
cC �V 0
ti
y?�q,dn
vro,r �u..N 4G
� �
NL}4~
c�.ry >Vy
U
do O
Ccup
Ux✓
Ta°iY
eGI
.rADA «✓
ur ✓ Ex ^a
w
V�ryby.
9 qV�N
P^
X9A
=F
Y.. �O
«_ ^q�d
Ea
CL)
i
rAwC
.° u` N
qL
ryVUN
F'•• e a
ro �C N
v oa s;z S EP.
OM°i a,
�`i E� ✓
��w ✓ q °
� L
�'^s
m+°.'Ci.
= oagy
i✓ nu
,�
e
»c qo
q»aE >'
i ^py�
7N. ?.�LYIyN
.N..p « ✓rTq°'
'a yp
p
N C
Lc
e�cN
O C
Vu
vy r w
^ 0•� E >✓ w L G
^IN
�� q .. AJ 6 C
L6Q�
� d:
c b Y T
Y�
C1w�
W L.
pQ.
C
gOOL
q
.O. ..
J OV
Nby,.F�
✓' O x �.
N CNC �Lp
T. q Y � A c
^AO.,.T°
G�.
U
d »oa
.Lro9
b u
a✓ '011::
C�
am
Ol G M
CE6�
�r
q
Cro.•.uLV° SO
CtlFFi Tm
-�
yiCYO w W
� N ^D °
q ✓�y
N
W aU Ya.F
c A n
vcA
A O
U
ra
t tq.q
�`
OO YLO.r` �O
Nr UI•M� ?.o
YD1��G9
'�t��a:l�ri
.S
»ro ~'n
tea. v.°...oq€
+a>
Yd
V
Y.°i2-
El .1.eN °ti1y
Vq. ✓p
p =C��En Lyi 01
LCN.•
fJ jig
C
U 2 J C
w26V1
ay
UnYO
Ain ^�
N U Y t U IJ
9
V O Zy t A M
O« d p O
O�b
^ V6
L
6E \
7'U
O'c
C: V^.
CNUyi
OZ TV t
N ✓NNLSS»dv
Iz
S n OGL
Q`N »W ✓r6
V
C.••V
r✓
Fv^r=
2� C
p° QLAY.Op.
CC
td 6.
�t
LL.
O
TC d^
N
_
y '1•lY
nC A
Y. y
C
B�EV
96
'.'Z
d o.q
M O.
LaU
LF Ld
aC �.NEVVCy y'
ty qaE-
c°�
N.N UQ
HYN•c,-
�D`q
U
vro,r �u..N 4G
� �
NL}4~
c�.ry >Vy
N.H
AL
N
c'°°
t... V
kc0
rod
C -C
4
r UW S .N Y
r� 1�=•�y'µ'm.�.
p�0
1:."-
O O
NbCCG
^yy
� G» C.
YQ
q
Ntiy�
as �
'^ C
n�
� A {n a'- � q y
40
NM�6o
�. ♦a Y
Y
.,0. UO d^'. ��
»c qo
�rL✓,
O o°
a ��
c E.°-
a
.ay cs
roy ]=
i ✓UU�O
ui]. L�uv n... °
✓.=CY L�°�>
v. yEx. ...
"� -CpC�
«�
�^= a
LC
e�cN
=
.rYe
r��N✓
i�:_
s`tyF
�O•
f .e- �awxr9 CCrOiq�
N *°.IC Ra
C1w�
W L.
pQ.
jroJ]N
O
Y-
- ro SNp »n
'-;7;: c
K.N+qq YM
b4�
Ol G M
a
Y
U N» s✓
y
R
L
b" c
N N m y N
p G y C
A O
L ro
✓�
2'b
w
D Y.A
14
Y c y q C
al
Yd
N
w«
C
�6 ^.-
fJ jig
A
U 2 J C
108-
O
N U Y t U IJ
9
V O Zy t A M
O« d p O
O�b
'�`�
4;.
y•cG
E.uy
AV ]y�CYN'
L.O
COI.. Cif
c0�1= -G✓
L 4LNL0t
OLroQ
ccC.
^dpEOE
^.q 'u0
NO' °Nw^
by y
66
9
C^ U
E z C
xi C E
p V
L C T Y
y
j �Ob
6 G
Q A 6� S
d'
� M y
`Ofq>
M' t N G A
V
C A N --: J
N o. n
.T V AL¢
O .0 i L
4 V .t ✓ ro 6 Y
pl D'ro N
E y
A...� p«�
F ✓.YNCq
Ylc^N4 AG
�t
Oki-
{Yjl
r1
�a
a
W ^0
V �o
CY�u
.V1Wl'
Nda
O
i
�
by
c4ro
<y.0 V Q
Ll OI Odd .
- IU.'OO
y
Ero.V L.
O
L
Lro 9 N
E O
L'yy
4
-.=Nro
O
�
Up
u0
�Q d U
v
O
Uu
pLb
C
N I
u
9
CIO
O �DN
= naw. t
�d-
9~
U�. �
IYi1YN
'YU4
«L
O�y
CNN
>Y
bkN NnP.uYro
Mnan00'^r -xaT
NY.
'O Ci
^.0
xN
Gi
.n
^j_'L
^LVT
LL
cminl
K
yi
o�
�
a
A
G
v4 �I,aS
Nb�
tea+-
aT ". 9
Naa
V
C.
NY01'
N
L
Y�
� C V
aC�u� c
pOY
O-
OrorrG
Lira
Mt
n:O1C
Y.y
��60 S.N Lf L-
,.
.LOS
cy1�•J
is3'i
d .r
-q
ir0
O� 0. 6.O rT .
Y4 c
3Ni�N`.
NO
@.xU L
�yY
N^
M QOI
YN
O �
K
Y6N
� m.
TI
'qq W.
cU
xY%Nd�YONLGCY
Y6yU roONaaN
n4ro
-0c�
CCOIm �• hd
NL� V M�
d�
N
C dp1�L.
quy
I
1lWAU I
L
It
gICV
ML M
a�
in o
ogxl
L
oN
D
Y J<
,�
rod
JrNN m L
yu=d .Qxa-
ct m
a 52' Vy
mo
poi
�e
aL
s°Y
Y om a�r°�u
au�u bo
La
LH m
N � vyi A x
�Mq
Q h �
_
CVI
< h
�'dM
3. N 0
Cxlzn
V4N.
I� M L
01'JYI� YE
+-M OL�b.O I.Y
< N V �� OI > O� g N 6
Sty Y
j ynC
U--
I H
MN -j4LOY
•
G a UU C
ro
a Y a
t c
O
T
5�g
C Ce= H
c.G G p d
S
Y
COI N
-` C •
3 L
^
b L O
c.
�. b 4�^
Ly C;
y #�
qq
cU
dK ♦I pro61
dN CA...
4M�C.x.
'`�>
Y�.'V
r.
two
T'
qV
s
DIu w+.VM
6O VSO �
NCUYL DIY
Cr•�
L4c
>N�
SpLU
at
C
"I•r
i O.
"rY
Y �a Ny 7
+ u50 s
NCY�
bo NN
m qjq�
4vyi • ;�L
i %NOxU
V
M ^y
cC Ua
ro Y-
4
d
C
Y g dg
d n
x«
bCIY N
-L6
d -C
-Nro
N
T
T�
La •
N
Y �y4tT D
c0
NN L=.a�
y6
SCI T~ Or L
E�
Nd4
d
d
�+roM
ba
=^
a^ �dI1r.V
iY. -Vw S.uM
u 6 •
a y L
b
d
w b L
c w 4
c
S O •s U
G
4 m O Y p
Y L q
k_- Or j.
V« VG
G-
E
Lro E
G
nlyn'
r
N
^� Cn
ID c
da
a T O
G
y,
E
W -L
CI C >
O
4cpc
m
L >
K
�O-
n�
G
Ny
fro. qi�
J G
tz � "CL
aY
w N
{ p
O
V
`�
ro
M ...^
Yrt r y V L O
L r c O u U 0
c ^ p s
L Y N u 4
c g q
c yI d ¢ q
< M x 0
No
b
< m \. CO
.G
N
E 4.
C%IO
Y N NU
CT G 9 p
w E V a L
W&
u
Oki-
-1 z -� •xr r o Ord p
'yya
�, Y N Y r Td ytiL1 ~ ` Y,C G IDS C� a c<P Y Y y • •. Lv.
u LA. Uy u L E u .Yi }yc p@@@@ V
;.5 6u6 PI
a^,'^ ^ E jyZG �YV Y ° E4 ^L. DO
MpE Ty0 �v CT .-. >w � • - rUO +A. CA WYY uy -! � °N
YTw a�r�)' yy r.1Lt S 'p^ SLY Fa Ntl O.Y
Q p y u V l a d Y N « ° Y O rlr" N Y• d
N qyz pNLV Y.PC 4C uo =NBC
�, rEEOY. AP W .N-jV w p.4j Ly LLd L %YN' a ,N
'_ • \' tY
U C Op r Y t Y... NC( y ..
a 6 A� O $H ,pi q do E y u d ]C
a ua a yE�eU a au p@ Ypya �`'�d E '.tt,
MO^ .Yr.0 •O.0 N qCY J FUFi" r"ryIDm ay..c YV > >rt
YoO =yY u(JWrO Lam. tl Yr9y a�qM `rr, 4Y 4.. <a .O �'
NY of CCd LyaCC. 4 S 4 qS q1�^ lYl q�yY C.aO.E „ YV
a
0q. N Y O �Y �Gyy'C
Yy^ uTr MYbY u W FO F6 g .^9 N�6t Y �Y •
� `,UFY NCYL L LL �1 �JID1
GLEY y .r B N V« p6 ! R =.+Y�u Y OL r>a{L O qr Y q Y N
p °O anY �)
4 ..N.tl4L. a O
� M ° w� N YID Le of y Iw
+a Ol' O N
F _ 4 oya w\ O LN�.�C Y OLT
q 1-�6w 24t1.N6 1-qq O rYW �. °�dCWN 6..�g4y.O N N >Yii
Y L Y .- q L L d � ,� O r L C g O
N
b qpL -Y �,Y,•,U �.yp .J �'4 �p qr L pq C�.Y
1^'Oy f. L u a. /y y yN PO O�.a S•• YO4
age
O V
wYaff O. +u NL rU � h4w NL w.Cr % Ya Y
NF �`r ~�i0 OLt a 3N� tr O °c a qN 7 W
YZ p,O.
O1 0 y-- �y,'�Q
6"OLY Y 1dL .CC a �yA. L��.qY NN a"M1Y TuGO.
Croc> Wv At
°' C i a
c c'c. -A `4
.Ar rP vg < °uL qc"i °N« L ,fin "a, 1, uaNi
o MY Ad a a N^ �aa a\ a _
CC :•°. v p C ..rID. 2p..r.0. Y "O'41 °Y N VID,.. warn30
^ us.'c.. i u-
uT
YT Y L'' Y L L a01L.0 .. Y °N anN N qy1 Ct `,r Q.�Dr
LrYO.r JL GAT C6ID� 4 •' S{� 6ry Lly¢$�i$qj$�.
I��Ia Y•+ NN. 2��- LC+- QYN� t, W� wEi
.N-, H • I Y
�i
t�
4J
V
Q:
Ste.
C.
L pt° GOION N .L U J D O NL.0 tl1 ►O
«O P Gw OY. =.ui� g6g�yy M C CLy u Od �C CY
O N 01 Y Y Q• CL• IS
G L.-W6l y10 �~4 O V OL 9 � A Nd r0o1
X.SoE 3.2-.78
C w
dLG >C O.►••,G wu•� Oi s � Y � 'Q. N. M9Y.
Et o 4 1 L 1 µ 0 L y O O O
Lu Yy.N
a �1111�yL �p w YNw .. Y O
Y L� }� 4 r t• V, 6 N L w Y D �,. , L1 L L
YN� °rywjNElNq U".nA 0� \. �F �Y•, °N Y V a ®G9EU f�
G'y^ E. 4YO.Y -eE a u i v " ... •"':: 1'
G Y w! ti Y G
~
YO YO nom. N p
Y� a YuN ?L1
W E
V� C Y YYY
pN �w mC.Ij Nfi. V� y .y.4 a� "ow : � YO. ►Yw N�.G
CCUI Cy4. UYf X11 t•�Y N LL d wi.LEp �G•r�
O y
Y YpLpG dG i.• CW.Ni
►'OON NYI U�QS `CeY� T a q NY O C r•U GN M bi wp,w03 Y60L
k m U < O Y Y O J14 } V w S N V Y� N- L p 6 A
c
'Qy► °► iy .� w LYi LY
O Y i CC O 0�1F1 OY°i .Lir {,1°V �(: 9 �'y pl YYYYY6 i YY
O O
V ri N eh Iff V \Iz
u
s
W J
°c�v
I
00
u� C
S.
O:
C►
^N
.Qm
:
.O
�Q��
�..
4
�^
Y
�^
A 'EpU
a L
CYC OI 2
•Cp.
S a
yCQY
g-2— .
LLp`uu
€.p
mG
pQ
f_C
CC
O
��.
CnY
^•
Cp
M
i
5
v
Y
LN; Q.
L
Yoq�i
.°.O +
w6 9f
Iz
o
YcS
i3
w$
ax.
°.i
°tai'
te
'
wL
A
•Y
y q
o.
M'3
� O
—
p Y O
'�
�
o�
o °S
C O
N�3- T
.�°w..
°NJ
v
u"
c'
V=�
T
I.
D9
La v
��° Lpp N
COr
C"
Y3
.
�
O
U g
�L
R
01
I
8
w
�b
Y
5
L
}�
w. p
y
�u
N`
�"
N Y
•��
YW Kv
tt
Y u
C
YM
M ••pp
µ
ur
Gyg
+ A
N=
V
UO
��upp.Q
N[JTV
►D
pp•E
L�
L
��
ZO
2IwpG�
!Z.�
y
�^Oy�
ND
�OYL
w
C O
r•' �
C1
V.Y
ate.
► O
G
w d—
" �
e
.
oC
LTI
,t g
v nu°•.
q �`.Q
N cY
yz�G
d`�
o
ym.�w
Ly
2r
�'
qa
►G•
v YuG
lY'�o
Lp,Yea
�V+Y�4
TCCO�a.
N
O
J.
1°.i.°-
V I Y C N f
S 9 g p
v.%
O G•r� E► L
Y
N
R
Y !
1
Ln
IN
0701 -02 o 7-24 --85 _ P.C. Agenda Packet o Paf 4
vl
^
_. +our
' d L
_
o. o. P*
a s:
C
d
up '
C
o
Z +,
yq �p
q
•4 �
9x
�.
A
RW
eLf
J
ut`Lt
d
� L
L
a
a
r
o¢
a�
G E
Rtd
Lo,
NCw
pnia
?
L
o
N 9 e
W
..2.
.n a
ANO
at
o
e `- u''.
R 2
�
N'� N.L
pL�u�L
�
� T•
L,gtlO
�v
uPE
m
w N
Ep�tV
Ny ST
lb
a Y
^ y
G
ri
dLC
G 4
y.LL
Lt
Nap
O
LY
yy
„u.3
Y2 Lass
��
>•w -
0
m y
o
Z•
�� 94
4 T
d�C =L
6E.p
a. Lm
OLaaapa
wLtl..
V
i
'
ai c
o
° ua
'a'S
o..•a R�
°ate
uyo@
°c
._.+
cc u.
w RV
ux
3
mat
o
u�
uo
u.stl.tl
.cam
e^
U4
;i GN it
U
Z;.2 w
Opp
add
G6
dna
LL
Re
tU�
6 y
.0
. ar
O N N M
O M�
C
wa
y aic
6r
L
A.CLG.
1- O.
CC H N
VN
CU
RL
R
p� Y'
511
.0 t3 CEE
:P O
N� LT
1YYC
;
p L
L
vEN
CC
p K
Nd
61
A m u
G
�r y
9y G
L X
COgiL o.Y
0j+
U�
N
CL
Yv. ��
LR];,w
dp4 cd
E dLY
Ga6
d Rt9 W
aN p� a ai
dp Ldj
ue�+,U^L
L^
Cam
d a+n.
MR L
Eausi�O
^NL O.tl
NV
kN
wY
C N.
Ua+OyUL
aOT
4
tl..
d
iTsj�
�d _
C a^
"Alai
y1r aN 4E. C
�v
d 6+ d
N
nO
N
G
b
n
m
Oa
6V O. +a-
lt'f aL,s.NL }Ci
6
SG V9 6 � '
^
ay`
L
W
L
amoc
Y L. v
L
C
d
up '
C
o
Z +,
yq �p
q
•4 �
9x
�.
A
RW
eLf
J
ut`Lt
d
� L
L
rnoy
L
a
r
o¢
a�
G E
Rtd
Lo,
C
c�
NCw
pnia
va °,
w
S C
dE
d
ANO
R^
C
o4aai
N°`
w�'
G
ri
dLC
G 4
+C
u o
O
LY
yy
„u.3
Y2 Lass
��
>•w -
0
m y
o
r�
q4
� �
!
i
C
Y
6
6
L
4Mti
N
1
n
rn^'
Nti
�
uo
NN
.cam
e^
wa
xRai
cr
c. a ��u
�c
�d
1 N
6. Pta.
W i
4 4 A R NC.
C iw
4ai�
}
!!__Il
Ll
w
L
G
&Z
_
y
L ,
au
R
L
d
� L
L
rnoy
L
a
r
o¢
o �
yyv2
4
Y X's
cy
E �
O
G
ri
dLC
G 4
+C
u o
O
V
= a N
a
>•w -
0
m y
o
q4
� �
!
i
C
Y
6
6
L
4Mti
N
1
!!__Il
Ll
�
1
L
A.
p
d
A
L
�p p01Y
�^
p
9 2
A6
N
}
CIA c
O
ply
iTi yA..
NE
<a
4 a
N a
8
�g
N c o p
< y ^
y
`
O y
4,u
u C
Gp
C
•U C ��
CJ
�
.� y.
l �O
YyJ
O� L
�Y
H
CII
_
W
_
S-
Aa a°nu4
N.o
%rn L LA vH
k tl
a o a,
nL
N
°N�
u
YL
,7.q
_q G
Y51
N 44
b
ud
Y.:u
�i
x L
d0
�a..
O�y.0 C N9M
L
pN
6
Y
CA
K y N
m E.
NV - at
L u�
YCI
Li o •.� d °Gl
N Y LGddl
rvd
�°r
CIA
C. Y9
<^
~ yv vnl.ar'. 'Owy
A ..dp A.
C.
Cd
��
°uO
�•
q1.�
ay
<° ^L y Y
ca s d
A p
p nq
pN
cu
CA
Yp Yy
Y3
j$� NcV'i
W Y
y
N fi N Y L
o^
2.
Q
Y Y L u� t
.- d
?' .; TOU,
CA
I
L r�pY 1'Y
wy
Lu YpLp
0
6N 4M
.
.
�O
�Jp tic,a
=I \�I NI
1'tl
OI \V \f� Vf .ICI
`C N
17
f
"S 41;
St,
It
to
c
« z
-
�14
i.
�
G
1
L mu- �
a 4
l
A.0 o9
ai
ff
N
I!
tl
Yl
'V
i
x i�l A! V A
61
y
y L
y Y
le
N
N G
+
C V,
tCl
i
9�. 1. y y
VI
{f II
iy ,Y
li
xk %„
n L. tGtY
y Jay 1�
spt
= 9
°
!
Y it n
1
cl 1h. N`
L .� 41 '
N��Y
e o. d.
N
'^ u u.
u`
m
< r
G c
0
p C
In
L M
e y
gs
yu°
°u
i`i
a
aa° LY
!
- W
�E
a
N
°
n
IL
d �LO L CF
A
1•.L q
{n{;p �.
.c
lip
Y. r y
tUA -
O
U°01
Ci C @ N l p
pit° A
VA.=
C
12 IJ
UU
V H
Y Gr
T
N r"p
V
hWU
GC. N' N Z�I O
NY
1^
HM,
CM Kx %
A
q
O .n
lu
i'
,fix
^ATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
cITS`T..EE REPORT G4
a 1 r
O o
F ^Z Z
July 24, 1985 ;
U A
.. i 1977
Chairman and Members of•t6e Planning Commission
Jack Lam, Community Development Director
Dan Col.en.an, rSenior Planner
CONDITIOMAL USE PERMIT 83 -11 DATA DESIGN - Review and
con— ideration 'of a time' extension and conditions of
approval for two temporary office trailers located at 7915
Center Avenue. �: !
I. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission approved the two temporary
trailers on July 27, 1983 which expires on July 27, 1985. The
purpose of this public hearing is -for the Planning Commission to
review and consider (1) a time extension for the two temporary
trailers; and (2) review the operation of the CUP to insure
consistency with the conditions of app -aval and poLontial
modification to the conditions of approval.
II. ANALYSIS: The Planning Commission may periodically review any
Conditional Use Permit to determine if it is being operated in a
manner consistent with the conditions of approval and a manner
which is not detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare
or materially injurious to properties in the vicinity. The
Planning Commission was greatly concerned with the duration of
these temporary structures and required to have the permanent
building completed and street improvements installed by
,Iuly 27, 5985. No permanent structure or submittal of pc- rmanent
plans has occurred to date.
The attached letter from the applicant states his intention to
commence construction of the street improvements during July 1985,
and be completed within 90 days. Regarding the permanent building,
the applicant indicates that the occupant of the two temporary
trailers, the subsidiary Siltron, has not experienced the original
growth projections; therefore, Data Design does not feel that a
permanent building is warranted at this time and requests a time'
extension for the next two years,
THREE OPTIONS: The following options may be considered by the
Planning Commission per Section 17.040.030(G) of the Development
Code:
A. Grant a time extension by finding that the CUP is being ,
conducted in an appropriate manner and that no action to modify
or revoke is necessary; or
ITEM J
li
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 83 -11 /Data Design
July 24, 1985
Page 2
B. Conditionally grant a time extension by finding than the CUP is
not being ;:conducted in an" appropriate manner and that
modifications trconditions: are necessary; or
C. Deny the time _extension by finding that the CUP i.3 not being
conducted in an appropriate manner and that modifications are
not availabje to mitigate the impacts and, therefore, revoke
the CUP which will reouire the business operation to cease and
the trailers to be removed in the -time alloted by the Planning
Commission.
The Development Code specifies a two -year approval period with "-he
possibility of two '12- month extensions. The maximum time period of
approval including extt,isions is four years from the original
approval date pursuant to Section 17,02.100, which is
July 27, 1987. Extensions may be granted with a finding that there
has been no significant changes in the land use element, industrial
Specific Plan, or charai :ter of the area that would cause the
project to be inconsisten,'. or nonconforming. Staff recomnends that
_iiuw review ono conszruczion ei a permanent facii*
IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertises as a.publi: hearing
in The Daily Report newspaper, the site posted, and notices were
sent to all property owners and businesses within 300 feet of this
site.
V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission
conduct a public hearing to:, (1) consider the time extension
request, and (2) review the business operation for compliance with
the conditions of approval and select from one of the options
described above. If after such consideration the Commission should
find that the CUP is being conducted in an appropriate manner,
adoption of the attached Resolution modifying the conditions of
approval and granting of a time extension would be appropriate.
Respectfully. ubmitted,
f~
Jack Lam '-- --
Community Development Director
JL :DC:jr
v
Attachments: Letter from Applicant I
Exhibit "A° - Location Map
Exhibit °B" - Site Plan
Original Resolution of Approval 83 -101
New Resolution of Approval
a
MIT OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: September 7, 19B3
TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager
FROM: Jack Lam, AICP.,, Director of Cuipmunity Development
SUBJECT: APPEAL OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 83-11 - DATA DESIGN - The i�Jacement of two
(2) 1440 sq.,Ft. office trailers on ].y acres of land
in conjunction with an existing manufacturing facility
in the M-R (Restricted-Manufacturing) zone located at
7915 Center Avenue - APN 1077-401-081
ABSTRACT. The applicant has requested that the conditions as approved
by the Planning Commission for CUP 83-11 be -amended. The conditions con-
cern ,:he time limit for removal of the temlorary trailers, development
of a permanent facility, and a requirement to extend the improvement
agreement for Center Street. A letter from Data Design Laboratories
outlining their concerns is attached.
SUMAIRY: :3C! 3ppr3,,t'�� v.
FTE—ioii�s requiring the in�tallation' of street improvements along Center
Avenue. The tentative map was given final approval and recorded. To
satisfy the conditions of the tentative map, bonds and a 12-month im-
provement agreement were accepted for Center Avenue. Construction
of Haven Avenue improvements were postponed to the time of development
of lots facing Haven. As a result of this new application for tempo-
rary office trailers, it was discovered that the Center Avenue Improve-
wents were not completed as per the prior approval. Therefore, the Com-
mission was reluctant to approve any more applications for the property,
until said improvements wet,e completed. However, in consideration of
Data Design's immediate need to have the trailers on site, the Planning
commission approve the use permit subject to obtaining a six-month
extension on the previous improvement agreement (this allowed immediate
place,r,)ent of the trailers) but approved the trailers for an initial
6-month period in order to insure that the Center Avenue improvements
would be completed in that time. The Commissfoi then would consider
C.,anting a longer period of time such as 2 year&. The Commission felt
that it could not issue a blanket approval because it wanted Data
Design to meet its prior commitment and did not want the City to incur
the expense and trouble of calling in the bonds. The Commission's
other alternatives would have been denial or postponement until tLyl
improvements were installed.
APPIJCANT I S APPEAL: The attached letter from Data Design requests the
f6wing three conditions be amended:
i
September 7, 1983
Appeal of Conditions of Approval
CUP 83.11 - Data Design
Page Two .,
1. "Condition i be amended to allow the temporary trailer:;
to be occupied for period of two (2) years from the
date of occupancy, unless extended by the Planning Commission."
The Planning Commission intends to consider a longer approval as des-
cribed above if the street improvements are completed as per prier com-
mitment. The six months was provided in conjunction with Condition No'.
3 so that the bond's would not be called. If Council modifies the ap-
proval period, (since Data 'Design has already executed the extension
of improvement agreement for 6 months) the bonds would be called after
6 months unless a new improvement agreement extension is approved by the
City council.
2. "Condition 2 be deleted in its entirety."
This condition is academic since the issue is the street improvements.
This condition which is placed on all approvals oF temporary facilities
was not changes oecause the Commission anticipated street improvements
to be completed arJ a longer approval period could be granted.
3. "Condition 3 be deleted in its entirety and the improvement
agreement for Tract 19428 be amended to require the improve-
ments to be made only when, a ;wilding permit for an additional
building in the tract ,:. issued,"
Since Data Design has alr:eady executed a 6 -month extension, this issue
is moot. However, if Cata Design wishes to modify the conditions of
approval of the tract map regarding the requirement for street improve
ments, (as implied in 'their letter) it cannot be done through this
appeal process. State law requires a full public hearing to be conducted
similar to the one conducted for the original tract hearing, if a pre -
viously approved condition is to be amended.
ALTERNATIVES: Aside from technicalities, the practical issue Council
must decide is should street improvements be installed as per prior
approved conditions before any other entitlements be approved. If so,
the decision of the Planning Commission should be upheld. If Data De-
sign installs the improvements, the "typical 2 years approval would
then be considered by the Commission as an extension to the CUP.
i
September 7, 1983
Appeal of Conditions of Approval s
.CUP 83 -11 - Data Design
{ Page Three
;
if, however, the Council wishes to postpone the improvements longer,
it can require a new improvement agreement and bond for a specific period
of time and grant a longer approval regardless of any new approvals.
The issue of the postponement of improvements to time of another- building,
approval requires an amendment to a prior approval and cannot be addressed
through the appeal process but through anew public hearing through the
Planning Commission.
Attached is the Planning Commission staff report, the Planning Commission
Resolution of Approval, and the Planning Commission minutes for the July
27, 1983 public hearing. In addition, 'a letter from a homeowner west of
Data Design Laboratories in ' opposition to the appeal is attached for your
review.
RECOMMENDATION- The Planning Commission recommends that the conditions
t be upheld=
Relpectol'y submitted,
Community Development Director
F. JL:jk
Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report - July 27, 1983
Planning Commission Resolution No. 83 -101
` Planning Commission Mir,tes - July 27, 1983
Exhibit "A" Data Deisgr. Appeal Letter
Exhibit "B" 7/26 Letter from Adjacent Homeowner
Exhibit "C" 8/26 Letter from Adjacent Homeowner
r
E 11
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The applicant, Data Design Laboratories,
is requesting approval to use two double -wide office trailers totaling
2880 square feet in size. The 'loning Ordinance permits the temporary
use of such trailers with approval of a Conditional Use Permit by the
Planning Commission.
The site is located on the east side of Center Avenue, one -half mile
north of Foothill Boulevard. The property is part of an industrial
complex with four buildings totaling approximately 65,000 square feet o,.i
24 acres of land. Exhibit "C" shows a previously approved tract map
which illustrates the future street pattern through the property and
location of each building. The trailers are to be installed on the
south side of Lot 9.
The applicant stated that the modular units will be sed for twelve to
eighteen months. A new assembly operation is proposOld at the site and
office space is needed for fourteen additional employees. Assuming that
the new operation is succesful, a new office building will be
constructed on an adjacent parcel.
ANALYSIS: Two potential areas of concern relative to this application
arE.Tl the visual impact of the trailers on adjacent property; and (2)
parking availability. As shown on Exhibit "A ", the site is located
adjacent to a residential area. However, visibility of the trailers
will be reduced by a 150 -foot setback from Center Avenue and landscaping
along the street frontage, therefore no significant visual impacts are
anticipated. Regarding parking, of the 82 spaces existing on the
subject, parcel, the modular units will eliminate approximately 13.
However, the remaining 69 spaces satisfies the Zoning Ordinance
requirements and exceeds the anticipated number of employees at the
site. If ;anyoverflow parking is required, the adjacent buildings owned
by Date Design have approximately 50 or 60 unused parking stalls.
� c1
_
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
� ,QCary
STAFF
,REPORT
s
a
�
O
F,
DATE:
July 27, 1983
1977
TO:
Members of the Planning Commission.
FROM:
Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY:
Curt Johnston, Assistant. Planner
SUBJECT:
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83 -11 - DATA DESIGN - The temporary
placement of two square foot office
trailers on
1.8 acres of land in conjunction with.
an. existing
manufacturing facility in the M -R T
(Restricted
Manufacturing) zone, located at 7915 Center
Avenue - APN
1077- 401 -08
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The applicant, Data Design Laboratories,
is requesting approval to use two double -wide office trailers totaling
2880 square feet in size. The 'loning Ordinance permits the temporary
use of such trailers with approval of a Conditional Use Permit by the
Planning Commission.
The site is located on the east side of Center Avenue, one -half mile
north of Foothill Boulevard. The property is part of an industrial
complex with four buildings totaling approximately 65,000 square feet o,.i
24 acres of land. Exhibit "C" shows a previously approved tract map
which illustrates the future street pattern through the property and
location of each building. The trailers are to be installed on the
south side of Lot 9.
The applicant stated that the modular units will be sed for twelve to
eighteen months. A new assembly operation is proposOld at the site and
office space is needed for fourteen additional employees. Assuming that
the new operation is succesful, a new office building will be
constructed on an adjacent parcel.
ANALYSIS: Two potential areas of concern relative to this application
arE.Tl the visual impact of the trailers on adjacent property; and (2)
parking availability. As shown on Exhibit "A ", the site is located
adjacent to a residential area. However, visibility of the trailers
will be reduced by a 150 -foot setback from Center Avenue and landscaping
along the street frontage, therefore no significant visual impacts are
anticipated. Regarding parking, of the 82 spaces existing on the
subject, parcel, the modular units will eliminate approximately 13.
However, the remaining 69 spaces satisfies the Zoning Ordinance
requirements and exceeds the anticipated number of employees at the
site. If ;anyoverflow parking is required, the adjacent buildings owned
by Date Design have approximately 50 or 60 unused parking stalls.
Conditional Use F. t 83 -11/Data Design ! "g
Planning Commission Agenda
i, July 27, 7.983
Page 2
f
Regarding the time limit for approval, the Planning Commission has in
the . „;ast, approved the use of trailers for two years. By the end of
this two year period, a permanent facility is to be completed and/or the
trailers removed.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider
all input t a— n elements of this project. If after; such - consideration the'
Commission can support the facts for findings, adoption of the attached
Resolution permitting the trailers for a two year time period would be
appropriate.
Resp ctfu lynttEr,
Rik v aez
C. y Planner
:CJ :jr
Attachments: Exhibit "A` - Location Map
Exhibit "B” - Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Data Design Master Pltn
Exhibit "D" - Floor Plan
Exhibit "E" - _Letter from Applicant
K. Resolution of Approval with Conditions
s RESOLUTION NO. 83 -101
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CJCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVING /iiW�i" CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 83 -11 FOR
TWOLOCATED TEMPOARY TRAILERS AT DATA-DESIGN LA
ATR7915 CENTER AVENUE IN THE M -R -T ZONE80RATORIES
WHEREAS, on the 8th day of July, 1983, a conplete application was
filed by Data-Des
Laboratories for review of the above - described project;
and
WHEREAS, on tta 27th day of July, 1983; the Rancho Cucamonga pli?nnin7
Commission held a public hearing to consider the above- ,iercribed project.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as
follows:
CTION 1: That the following findings can/aeRoot be met:
1. That the pt-cposed use is in accord with the General
Plan, and the purposes of the zone in which the use
is proposed, and
2. That the proposed use, together with the #or�d }o10the
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental Loathe
public health, 'safety, or welfare, or
injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity; and
3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the
applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. !
SECTION 2: That Conditional Use Permit ,No. 83 -11 is approved
subject to throwing conditions-
PLANNING DIVISION
1. The temporary trailers are approved for a six ule s
month period from the date of occupancy,
extended by the Planning Commission. However, if
the trailers are not occupied within six (6)
months
this approval shall become null and void, unless
extended by the Planning Commission.
2. Development of the permanent building shall b`
completed and ready for 'occupancy, or the traile'
shall be removed prior to expiration of the u
Conditional Use Permit.
x
Resolution No. 83 -1
Pa e2
9
j
Y
ENGINEERING DIVISIOI.
3. Prior to occupans!y -an application for an improvement
agreement extension of six (6) months shall be
submitted.
APPROVED AND ADOPTO WS,.27TH DAY OF JULY,.1983.
PLA ING OMMISSION OF THE CITY 05 RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY •
•Dennis L. stout, a man
- T: �,,—M-'t5mm ec retar :oi the anr�issian
s y
i, JACK LAM, Secretary, of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby ceri.ity that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plarnlina Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at. a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 27th day of July, 1963, by the fallowing 'vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISS10HERS. REMPEL, MCNIEL, BARKER, JUAREZ
NOES: COMMISSIONERS STOUT
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
i
. ,
t
j
M. CONDITIONAL-USE PERMIT 83 -10 - PRESSLEY - A change of ownership .•or arr '
arcade jformerly JJ's Arca a in the E- zone to be located at 6642 and
6646 Carnelian.
Dan Coleman, :Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report.
Chairman Stout opened the public hearing.
Steve Pressley:, applicant, addressed the Commission stating that his agreement
with the Resolution and condii'Yons of approval.
Commissioner McNiel advised that this item had been advertised in the
newspaper and the area property owners notified, however no opposition was
expressed to City staff. He reminded the applicant of the opposition voiced
when Mr. Mannella first applied for the Conditional Use Permit for JJ's Arcade
and advised that he should run his operation in a similar manner.
Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by McNiel, unanimously carried, to adopt
Resolution 83 -100 approving Conditional Use Permit 83 -10.
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, MCNIEL, BARKER, JUAREZ, STOUT
NOES; COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried-
N. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83 -11 - DATA DESIGN The temporary placement of
E. two 0 sq. t, office tra-i ers on 1.8 acres of la;ld in conjunction
with an existing manufacturing facility in the M -R -T (Restricted
Manufacturing) zc _ _:-,ated at 79-15 Center Avenue - APN 1077- 401 -08.
Rick. Gomez, City Planner, reviewed the staff report..
Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer, stated that staff suggested an additional
condition be added to the Resolutiov under Engineering Conditions to require
the application for an Improvement Agreement extension prior to occupancy of
the trailers. He explained that street improvements had been previously
bonded for which required their installation within 12- months; however, time
on this agreement had lapsed and development activity in the area has
increased, therefore staff recommends that the extension be applied for and
the applicant begin to make arrangements to install the street improvements.
Chairman Stout asked what a reasonable amount of time would be to install the
improvements.
Planning Commission Minutes -ir July 27, 1983
Y
j,- -
Mr. Rougeau replieo -that 6 months is adequate, however they could possibly be Y
�1 done in three to four months.
Chairman Stout openE; the public K;-, ,ing. `
Dominic Salvati, represer.tinq Data Design, addressed the Commission stating
after approval of the parcel map City staff had advised the applicant that
there was no urgency to install the street improvements until construction of
additional buildings. He further stated that tine trailers would r1'low Data
Design to bring additional employees and revenu, to the City, and urged the
approval of the Conditional Use Permit.
Commissioner Barker asked if tle bond required installation of improvements
prior to additional construction.
Mr. Rougeau•replied that there are lien agreements which require installation
prior to construction, however it was his opinion that this applicant had a.
12 -month bond.
Commissioner Rempel stated thb' the improvements on Haven were: the only ones
he 'recalled be r«J deferred by the cv mission in its previous review. Further,
normally these improvements would h'Ave been required prior to recordation of
the final map.
Mr. Salvati advised the Commission of the importance of the approval of the
Conditional Use PermW to allow the installation of the trailers so that
employees could begin work on August 2. He further advised that he would be
in the City offices the next day to sign the lien agreement extension.
Chairman Stout asked Mr. Salvati to explain his position on the improvements
and if he felt that th^ improvements on Center Avenue were necessary after the
installation of the trailers.
Mr. Salvati replied he did not feel them necessary at this time.
Chairman Stout advised that the staff is recommending a 6 -month extension to
install the improvements and not 6 months to come back to the Commission for
r discussion,.
`{ Mr. Salvati replied that the improvements would be put in upon construction of
additional buildings. further; he was not in a position to make a decision
regarding the improvements, but did not see why the CJP could not be granted
and then have the Commission call in the bonds if the improvements were not
installed in 6 months.
Mr. Rougeau stated that the agreement would be for a 6- month extension at
which time Oe applicant could apply for an additional extension. However, at
that time, the extension could be denied and the City could call in the bonds.
There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed.
<• -li.- July 27, 1963
Planning Commission Minutes
1
Chairman Stout stated that he was not in favor of approving the Resolution for
the CUP unless it contained a requirement: that the-street improvements be
installed prior i:o occupancy of the trailers.. Further, that the improvements
should have been done a long time ago and did not see why the City should be
subjected to the expense of calling in bonds..
Commissioner Rempel stated that staff's proposal is a fair compromise for-both
the applicant and the City that the street improvements go in;, however, did
not feel an additional extension should be granted.
Commissioner McNiel stated that approval of the Conditional Use Permit could
be for 6 months and if the improvements are not installed in that time, the
CUP could be revoked.
Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by McNiel, carried, to adopt Resolution
83 -101 approving Conditional Use Permit 33 -11 with an amendment to Planning
Division condition one to read that the tempovary trailers are approved for 6
months, and the inclusion of an Engineering condition to read: "Prior to
occupancy, application for an Improvement Agreement extension shall be
submitted ".
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, MCNIEL, BARKER, JUAREZ
a
+ ii3ES: COM',1133It NEr".:;: STOUT
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried -
I,
Chairman Stout voted no for previously stated reasons.
. Edward Hopson, Assistant City Attorney, advised that. the decision of the
Planning Commission is appealable to the City Council.
j; DIRECTOR "S REPORTS
0. DEVELOPMENT CODE
Rick Gomez, City Planner, presented the report and meeting schedule to the
Commission.
k
It was the consensus of the Commission that the following meeting dates be
established for the review of the Draft Development Code: August 16,
September 6, September 20, October 4, -and October 12. All meetings will be
Planning Commission Minutes -12 July 27, 1983
171.41 987 -2511
P.O. BOX 711
�DATA-DEISI GN LaboratoFx�
7.925 CENTER Al., hFUE
CUCAMONGA, CALIFGRNSA 4173Q
21 May 1985
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Community Development Dena *_tment
Planning Division
9320 Baseline road, Suite C .rt.,
Rancho C,,i::amonga, California 91730 r�
Attention: Mr. Rick Gomez, City planner
Subject: Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 83 -11 Expiration
Gentlemen:
This letter is submitted to advise the Planning Division o the
current status regaz ing Data-Design Laboratories' CUP 83 -11 aad
provide a written req'uect for two twelve month extensions for two
temporary trailers located at 7915 Center Avenue. The expz.ration
date of CUP 83 -11 is July 27, 1985.
When the CUP wAis approved by the City Council two conditions applied
1. That the improvement agreement be extended fox a period
of two years to install street improvements on Center
Avenue and construct pertain private streets i ^side the
tract
Status
Lockwood Engineering -ind. Survey Company is *jresently
working on the drawings and bid package for the street
improvements. Lockwood will have the drawings and bid
package completed by May 31; 1985. Data- Design will
submit the bid package to three contractors acid select
a contractor daring June, 1985. The contractor will
{ be directed to apply for building permits as soon as'
possible and construction is expected to commence
during July, 1985 and bt�i completed within ninety dayfA.
2. Completion of a permanent building by the CUP expiration
date.
status -
Approximately two years a o, Data - Design relocated
subsidiary Siltron from Gardena, California to the
Cucamonga site and recnrved CUP approval for two temporary
trailers.
�- s�
i DATA -USIGH !LABORATORIES
Mz. Rick Gomez
21 May 1985
Page Two
During this two year ,period, the growth anticipated for
Siltron -)t
was P_ achieved, personnel and management problems
were experienced, and the Company is
still operating at a
i loss. On the positive side. Siltron's engineering depart-
ment has developed and produced three new products that are
currently being marketed
and a new President has been hired
with a new business recovery plan underway.
Data - Design has a substantial investment in Siltron and
expects a turnaround can be achieved over the next two years.
At the present time, Data- Design believes that a permanent
building for Siltron is
Zot warranted and would like to
continue utilizin=17the two temporary
trailers for the next
two years.
In summary, Data - Design is committed and will install the street
improvements
in accordance with our improvement agreement, '.ut
- respectfully requests
a CUP extantic,i of 4:wo years for the two
temporary trailers.
Very truly _yours,
DATA- DESIGN LABORATORIES
I
Dominic Salvati
!I
Executive vice President
E DS:lcm
L
t
r
,
v
LM
E]
TERRA
t F
t FC
GC
1
l
lop WN
nan
1
r�
1
r
YL
Future City
7-'- r Hall
RE 51H I
NORTH
r �
I 1
i
CITY Of I E..NI. e-. 0. i? s3- ! 1- akrA T, -Stt- i
RANCHO CU AMONGA Ti i ►-E_ L.=A-„.=*4 A,,
I'I.A�1Niit'G DIVISIaN E HIBiT 'A` SCALE
"*D V. ieS SHEETS
LOCKWOOD 9NGiNEERING
'791ri GEC, �LklUfl!" (P gax ' *� DA7E � -20 -83
SURVEYING COMPANY, INC. RAN =Ar sr��_K./f
380 blest foothill Blvd. 9t73Cr
a
Rialto. Caiilarnia 9ESCRIPTIC >N.�nA1D!Tf/1r:1�_ KF P�jIAiT A.C.6. � p
1 7
LD—r A.. (96A0 "` 5E7A6P1T
•IS.o4•
23.5'
27`
Is
t a
r4) 4` AS
831.44 � --- :..✓"`..
''''���'''���"�'T?; hT , ( !
E><lS.ibtd A.G. OrLFJES.y'! PA1LKlAta.''j
f •�.
4
�
It EXISTlF.IG 6Ut4t7TF1G"""
WT 9, -rrzACC K0.114-Z8
ssaf 1g -2l
LNV� 1�'
ol
Z N`
Ni _
4
<
}
� EXSST.tGc'7Att;JNG 'HALLS `l
'��j+C.'6 EXI�Ti1JG SLlII�IPiG t
f IAN" -itINE SHOP e
• _ �j4�ICi13G 2EL�U7tZx= J/iE�}-[-5� - _ _ _ - — .__- ---_ -_
fXISL OFFiC _.,1:250 _ $000S.FA ? -00 CAMS=—
XRCVS MIAt_ . i SOO . ;. $,000 S.F._. -16.00 G4'aiPS .:,
.pwflosEp oFmca s t:zso 28f3os.� ._, 4t.S2 cams
TOTA<_5 f &j880S.F __. . 60 CAdLS R1 =+CJ'o
SCRL.E:.: t ° -'P.a� PACZKING 6�IZC�yIDII� : - -....
k XVESTjtacxc HiMikSr df Swrtt cgcLS
CITY OF ITEM:
RAN HO CLCANIONGA 72TU:
PLANNING D11nS (XN SCALE.- 1 "Q
M. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83-10 PRESSLEY A change of ownership for an
arcade (formerly JJ's Arcade) in the-7--1 zone to be located at 6642 and
6646 Carnelian.
Dan Coleman,* Associate. Planner, reviewed the staff report.
Chairman �-,--6,ut opened the public hearing.
Steve Pressley, applicant, addressed the Commission stating
with the Resolution and conditions of dpprovr]. h;vi, '�eement
Commissioner McNiel advised that this item had been advertised in the
newspaper and the area property owners notified, however no opposition was
expressed to City staf"f. He reminded the applicant of the opposition voiced
when Mr. Mannella first applied for thp Colidlitional Use Permit for JJ's Arcade
and adviscd that he should run his operation in a similar manner.
Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by McNiel, unanimously carried, to adopt
Resolution 83-100 approving *Conditional Use Permit 83-10.
KYES: C0141ISSIONERS-, REMPEL, MCNIEL, BARKER, JUAREZ, STOUT
!`�OES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried-
N. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83-11 - DATA DESIGN Thq temporary placement of
two (2) 1440 sq. ft. office tra—R—ers on 1.8 acres 2f lznd in conjunecion
with an existing manufacturing facility in the M-R-T i�estricted
Manufacturing) zone located at 7915 Center Avenue - APN 1077-401-08.
Rick Gomez, City Planner, reviewed the staff report.
Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer, stated that staff suggested an additional
condition be added to the Resolution under Engineering Conditions to require
the application for an Improvement Agreement extension prior to occupancy of
the trailers. He explained that street improvements had been previously
bonded for which reqLf-;,7ed their installation within 12-months; however, time
?n this agreement had lapsed and development activity in the area has
increased, therefore staff r-commends that the extension be applied for and
the applicant begin to make arrangements to install the street improvements.
Chairman Stout asked what a reasonable amount of time would be to install the
improvements.
AMC Planning Commission Minutes -10- July 27, 1983
9-7
Mr. Rougeau replied that 6 months is adequate, however They could possibly be
done in three to four months.
Chairman Stout opened the plublic hearing.
Dominic Salvati, representing Data design, addressed the Commission stating
after -,p-.oval of the parcel map City staff h:ir, advised the applicant -Ihat-
there was no urgency to install the st,,eet improvements until construction of
additional buildings. He further staid that the trailers would allow Data
Design to bring additional employees and revenue to the City, and urged the
approval of the Conditional Use Permit.
Commissioner Barker asked if the bond required installation of improvements
prior to additional construction.
Mr. Rougeau replied that there are lien' agreements which require installation
prior to construction, however it was bis opinion that this applicant had a
12- month bond.
Commissioner Rempel stated that the improvements on Haven were the only ones
he recalled being deferrer' by the Commission in its previous review. Further,
normally these improvements would have been required prior to recordation of
the final map.
Mr. Salvati 'advised the Commission of the importance of the approval.of the
s Conditional Use Permit to allow the installation of the trailers so that
employees could begin work on August 2. He further advised that he would be
in the City offices the next day to sign the lien agreement extension.
Chairman Stout asked Mr. Salvati to explain his position an the improvements
and if he felt that the improvements on Center Avenue were necessary after the
installation of the trailers.
Mr. Salvati repl ed he did not feel them necessary at this time.
Chairman Stout advised that the staff is recommending a 6 -month extension to
install the improvements and not 6 months to come -Uack to the Commission for
discussion
I
Mr. Salvati replied that ;.he improvements would be put in upon construction of
additional buildings. Further, he.was not in a position to make a decision,
regarding the improvements, but did not see why the CUP coui,+ not be gran�ed
and then have, the Commission call in the bonds if the improvemF-ts were not
installed in 6 months.
Mr. Rougeau stated that the agreement would be for a 6 -month extension at
which time the applicant could apply for an additional extension. However, at
that time, the extension could be denied aid the City could call in the bonds.
There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed.
Planning Commission Mihates -11- July 27, 1983
,,1I
Chairman Stout stated that he was not in favor of approving the Resolution for '
the CUP unless it contained a requirement. that the street improvements be
installed prior t occupancy of the trailers. Further, that the improvements
should have been di,ae a for -g, time ago and did not see why the City should be
subjected to the expErsse_of calling in bonds.
Commis3ionrr Rempel stated that staff's proposal is a fair compromise for both
the applicant and the City `that the street improvements go in; however, did
not feel an additional eAersion should be granted.
i
Commissioner icNiel stated that approval of the Conditional Use Permit could
be for 6 morths and if the improvements are not installed in that time, the
CUP could be revoked.
Motion: Moved byRempel, skconded by McNiel, carried,: 'to adopt Resolution:
83 -101 approving Conditional Use Permit 83 -11 with an amendment to Plann ffig
Division condition one to read that the temporary trailers are approved for 6
months, and the inclusion of an Engineering condition to','read: "Prior to
occupancy, application fo„ tan Improvement Agreement extension shall be
submitted ".
ti
a
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, MCNIEL, BAWER, JUPREZ
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: STOUT
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried-
Chairman Stout voted no for previously stated reasons.
Edward Hopson,. Assistant City Attorney, advised that the decision of the
c Planning Commission is appealable to the City Council.
+c
DIREC EPORTS
0. DEVELOPMENT CODE
Rick Gomez, City Piunner, ;
� ''' � present erL�ort and ,meeting schedule to the
Commission.
It was the cLnsen tts. of the Conwission that �fowing� eeting pates be
esta blished for the review,of the Draft .DevAugust 16
f September 6, 'September 20, October 4, and October 12. All' ings will be
Planning Commission Minutes -12- July 27, 1983
J
ity Council Minutes
embet 7, 1983 ,
Page . k
RESOLUTION 158
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUN y OF AR CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA. CALIF.URNIA APPM PING A LOAN ,,TO THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA REDEFLOPMENT AGENCY
s.. Acceptance of Agreement for professional construction rvices for
Ar Victoria Planned Community by Hotch Bedrosian, own of Runmar
Enterprise ^.i.
t; Minor( contract Modifications -Army Corps or Engin rs contract For
w' Recreation Development at Cucamonga /Demens Channels.
U. Acceptance' of Annual Supplementary Maintenance d Emergency Contract
renewal with Laird Construction.
Motion: Moved by Frost; seconded by Sch10• nr to approve .the Consent
Calendar. Motion carried unanimously 5-o.
�r
t
PUBLIC - TNGS.
4A. EHVYRONDfLh7P,1..ASSESSMENT AND Z01 CBAtCE 8'_.-0 LEE.. A - :hange of zone
from A -t (Limited Agriculture) to -3 (Multi- Family Residential) for 1.9,
acres of land located On the west de of Vineyard Avenue between Arrow Route
EEE and Foothill Boulevard APN 20 - 211 -24. Staff report by Michael Vairin,
Senior Planner.
Title of Ordinance No. 20 we read by Deputy City Clerk, Beverly Authelet.
OR D ANCE NO. 2J9 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE THE 'CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, C IFORNIA. REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER
207- 271 -24, OCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF VINEYARD BETWEEN
r ARROW AO AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD FROM A-;1 TO R -3.
Mayor Mikels op ed the meeting for public hearing. Addressing council ua3.
t William a, i %PPlicant for the project, stated he was present to answer
(
any que ions that council may have.
There b ng no further response "from the public, Mayor Mikels .closed the (' public earing.
41oti
Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Frost to waive full reading hr
0 ance No. 209. Motion carried unanitzv5ly 5 -o.
3ror Mikels set second reeding for September 21, 1983.
49. APPEAL OF' 1 :I1dM Ra C'R*F SIGN DECISION - CO!D)ITIORAL USE FERMIS 8 -11
DATA DESIGN. ippeal of Planning Commission decision for
placement of two 1440 square foot office trailers 0a 1.8 acres of land in he. temporary
conjunction with an existing manufacturing facility !n the M -R T (restricted
manufacturing) zone located at 791 Center Avenue - APR 1077 -4T (re Staff
report by Michael Vairin, Senior Planner.
Mayor Mikela opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council was:
Tom Reisker, President of Data Design Laboratories. Mr. Beisker stated
when they signed the original agreement, it was their understanding the
street improvements would take Plana at such time as the next building on
the property would be built. At that time they did expe0t t0 bui
Building 4 or about 40,000 square feet and Were planning to put in t
,. U
CCity Council .Minutes
September 7, 1983
Page 5
street Improvements. In paragraphs 2 and 3, it indicated the agreement
_ would be in default after two years unless an extension of time in
,granted,
When thay got the extension agreement, they felt the agreement would be
related to a building permit and when they built the next building thus
Increasing the traffic flow, then the street improvements would be
nece3'7Ery.
'fhoy have now moved a business in at this location. They will be adding
�5:employees into the area. it is Impossible to come .up with a building
plan and build within U1,0 nart six months. They are not sure the business
they are bringing in will work out. Rancho Cucamonga has been willLfg in
the past to offer a Company a temporary type permit to see if the business
ping to work out. Therefore, they were requesting _a time extension
smgtj' tie the improvements on Ctater Avenue to the time they come in with
tb-r „ Ding permits.
There thing no further response from the public, Mayor Mikels closed the
public hearing.
r
Mr. Buquet asked how long DDL has been there. Hr. Heiseker stated since 1969.
Hr. Dahl stated it has been the policy of the City that whenever we have a
temporary trailer, we have requested the site improvements. As example,s,
'
Empire Hank and the Baptist Church on 19Lh Street. He was concerned when a
i
businessman stated that this may be a temporary thing. He wonders what will
i
happen if this business should fail.- He stated he would uphold the Planning
Commi3sion83 decision an this.
Mr. Buquet stated these sites were at major intersections. He said there were
a let of businesses that could come forward and sr,,y that they might not be
around in three years. .There would be 25 additional cars and Wondered whether
these really would require extensive improvements now. He would like to give
the applicant the opportunity to put in the units.
i
i
Mr. Dahl stated the improvements required at Vineyard, Bank was not exactly at
an Intersection. This was a point at which a precedent has been set. Be felt
that when the agreements were made in the first place, everyone was acting in
good faith. If we set a precedent, It could be dangerous for the future.
Mr. Schlosser concurred with Mr. Buquet's position. He stated that if he had
not received a permit for an office trailer when he first came to town, his
h 1
company would not be employing 200 people today.
1f% �U�G %tEW'_4 11pa1s�.
Motion: Moved by Schlosser to grant the two -year extensions.
✓� 1
Mayor Mikels skated the main issue is the conditions -if approval on the
original 'which °t
f
permit wasa complied with. This is a precedent that if set
would provide some serious problems in the future. Now we hive a request for
41 �
J
further action to waive the requirement for the improvements and to extend it
C
further.
Mr. Varirin stated the Council could extend the agreement for those
improvements for a ,period of time of two years. Council cannot Y.i" end
.void
the agreement and say you don't have to build them until the building of tine -- _=
first. building. This is- becuase of the way the Map was first conditioned.
Mayor Mikels asked Mr. Beiseker if he understood. To remove the requirements
a
for the street improvements which were a condition of original approval would
require' a new public hearing before the Planning Commission and actually
f
changing the Kip. Council has the authority to extend the Conditions of
IIiE
Approval and grant an extension -on the temporary faoilities up to two years.
tt
In two years the street improvements would need to be in and the ,trailers
1
removed.
Ix,
r
P
1j,
Y Council Minutes
.•ptember T, 1989
Page 6
Allk
Mr. Beisekeratated he understood.
Mr. Gam stated that if it is Council's desire to extend the Improvement
Agreement, there is also z need to request concurrence on submission of-
current bends. When you extend it for "x" amount of time, you want to make
certain the bonds will cover that. _
Mr. Lam summarized the action to be taken that if Council wishes to allow a
greater length of time for the trailers, then Council should grant "x" amount
of time for the trailers. If Council wisher the street improvement extended
�r "x" amount of time, .then Council should approve an extension to the
{ Improvement Agreement for that period of time, and get concurrence from the t
appL',cant that he will post b--ds to cover the cost of the extension.
Discui.Nion followed by council regarding this lssu:.
Mr. Buque,asked the city attorney if there was a way that if an agreement is
• e made r-QVI 'een the City and the Company and should development occur to the
nortb, eN, south before the two year period, that we could request the
impro,!em�,nts to be put in with the other development..
Mr. D;righepty responded this could be made a condition. There should be a
fixed'harimum,_period of time set and this could be terminated upon a sooner
even"'.,", �
Mr- Beiseker stated he understood that it a development north or Huth
occurred, they would be willing to add to the agreement that at that time, ,,he
council could call for the improvements to be maoo within the two year ti, e
frame.
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Buquet to grant the extension for
two year period; require new bonds be posted, and 2ondition the Improvement
Agreement that if any development occurs in the ;wo year period, then the
agraemants could be called. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
RZ fr-P?.AG OF CORDITIONS BOE pAECEL HAP 8007 LOCATED ON TBE WEST ST—. OF
BERt A9ER0E BL1'WEEN wILTON SHD HILLSIDE A9ENOPS Requested by tanina Biane
Tibbets . veloper, Paul Rol,�`eau Associate "Civil Engineer, presented staff
report.
Mr. Rougeau stat hat the Planning Commission did not have the authority to
grant the poseponeme
Council. therefore, the appeal had to come before the City
i
Maror Mikels opened the meet in or public hearing. Addressing Council was:
Janine Tibbetts, uctiag in be t of her father who was owner of the
property, stated thft,! rovements o Nilson is already quite desirable and
to make the regv= tea ,improvements ri t now would be a detriment. They
wanted to defer this until hne of the a acent pieces of properties were
developed.
Thera being no further response from the public, yor Mikels closed the
public hearing.
Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Schlosser to aphold the eal and direct
staff to develop the appropriate lien agreement for subs t approval.
Nation carried unanimously 5-0.
LD. HISTORICAL UNDNAU DESIGNATION VOR B.D. COUSINS Rome
BODSEk. Staff report presented by Bill Holley, Community Services Directo
Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no respons
the public `hearing was closed. (Owners of the house were not present) .
i
F
s
I,
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -101
AML
A RESOLUTION dF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSIOR
APPROVING. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 83 -11 FOR
TWO TEMPORARY TRAILERS AT DATA - DESIGN LABORATORIES
LOCATED AT'7915,CENTER AVENUE IN TAE M -R -T ZONE
WHEREAS, on the?Sth day of July, 1983, a complete application was
filed by Data - Design Laboratories, for review of the above- described project;
and
WHEREAS, on the 27th day of July, 1983, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning
Commission held a public hearing to consider* the above - described pro !kt.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as
follows:
SECTION 1: That the following findings can /cannot be met:
t 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the Genera3
Plan, and the purposes of the zone in which the use
is proposed; and
2. Th;,t the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimenta,� to the
public health, safety, or welfare, or materially
p injurious to properties Rjr improvements in the
t vicinity; and
! 3. That the proposed use will ,comply with each of the
applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance.
SECTION 2: That tondational Use Permit No. 83 -11 is approved
subject to the i:T owing conditie:: e
PLANNING DIVISION
1. The temporary trailers are approved for a six (6)
month period from the date of occupancy, unless
extended by the Planning Commission. However, if 7 -27- SS
the trailers are not occupied within six (6) months
this approval shall become null and void, un;:�ts
extended by the Planning Commission.
2. Development of the permanent building shall be
completed and ready for occupancy, or the trailers
shall be removed prior to expiration of the
Conditional Use permit_
f! m
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVING MODIFICATION OF THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83 -11 FOR TWO TEMPORARY TRAILERS
LOCATED AT 7915 CENTER AVENUE, IN THE INDUSTRIAL SPCIFIC
PLAN.
WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension ror the
above - described project, pursuant to Section 17.02.100; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the
abov, lescribed CUP 83 -11; and,
%IEREAS, on the 24th day of July, 1985, the Planning Commission held
a public hearing to review the operation of CUP 83 -11, pursuant to Section
17.04.030(G), and,
WHEREAS, the business operation is not being operated in a manner
consistent with the conditions of approval and that modifications to
conditions are necessary.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as
follows:
SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met:
1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General
Plan, the objectives of the Industrial Specific
Plan, and the 'purposes of the district in whi& the
site is located.
2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the
public heals q safety, or welfare, or materially
injurious ;co properties or improvements in the
vicinity.
3. That the proposed use complies with each of the
applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific
Plan,
SECTION 2: Thdt Conditional Use Permit 83 -31 is approved subject to
the following conditions and attached standard conditions:
Resalution No. 83,,7,x%
Page 2
ENGINEERING DIVISION
3. Prior to occupancy an application for an improvement
agreement "extLmsion of s! .,, 3t t6) man-chs shall be
submitted
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS_27TH DAY OF JULY, 1983.
PLA ING OMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCNIONGA
I
BY: Lt!y
L. Staut, a man
��. Dennis en
-'
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Comm ssi,�n of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly intrrduced, passed,
and adopted by the Planning. Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a
regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 27`.h day of July, 1983,
by the foilawing vote -to -wit.
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
REMPEL:, MCNIEL, BARKER, JUAREZ
NOES. COMMISSIONER:':
STOUT
{
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
NONE
i
j
1'
i
1
J
Resoluticn No. f
CUP 83 -11 /Data Desigr.
July 24, 19$5
Page 2
PLANNING DIVISION:
1. The two temporary trailers are approved for an
additional one (1) year perio's', unless extendeJ by
the Planning ' Commission, and shall expire on
July 27, 1986.
2. Development plans for the permanent facility shall
be submitted to the,_ Planning Division for
Development Resew within ninety (90) days.
3. Development of the permaoent balding shall be
completed and ready for occupancy prior to
eypiration of the Conditional Use Permit or the
temporary trailers shall be removed. j
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24th �?AY OF JULY, 1985. j
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Dennis L. Strtut, Chairman
ATTEST:
Ja,�k l;am, Secletary
1, Jack Lam, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution -as duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plann.ag Commission of -the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission 'held
on the 24th dmy of July, 1985, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES;
COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
Ell
CITY OF ANCHOCUUCA21NGA r, CMJ STAFF REP
U
DATE: July 24 zl,985 i ts7i
TO: Chairman ;and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Jack Lam;, Com9unity Development Director
BY: Howard Fields, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85 =02
-- RON ISHII - To allow the development of a one -story
church 4,740 Square feet`, anal asso;iated small stora p
building (216 square feet), on 3.88 acres in the Very Low �
Residential. District located on the northwest corner of
Haven and Hillside - AON 201-- 101 -027.
I� PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Requested: Approval of a precise site plan, elevations,
and issuance of a Negative Declaration.
B. Existing Land Use: Very Low Residential, vacant.
C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
North Existing single - family residences, Very Low
Residential (less than 2 4u /ac).
South - Vacant, Very Los! Residential (less than 2 a /ac).
East - Existing sin le- family residences, Very Low
Residential (less than 2 du /ac).
w3st - Existing single - family residences, Very Low
Residential Iless than 2 du /ac).
D. General Plan bes °;Mations:
Project Site Very Low Residential
North - Very Law Residential
South - Very Low Residential
East - Very tow Residential
West - Very Low Residential
E. Site Characteristics: The project site is a vacarv, corner lot
with steep sloping terrain elf approximately 7% grade from north
to south and 4% from east to west. The site is sparsely
papulated wits: weeds and shrubs, and contains no significant
ttees or landforms.
ITEM K'
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
"O 85 -02 - RON ISHII
July 24, 1985
Page 2
II. ANALYSIS:
A. General: The,-14 740 sq. ft. 96u—,-h will have a fixed seating
' capacity of 257 'seats, regUiring a total of 124 parking
stails. The, internal site circulation is adequate to
accommodate the proposed use with ingress and egress occurring
via Haven Avenue ano along Hillside Road.
Major issues identified through the. review process were
grading /drainage and design elevations. The applicant has .
proposed the use of -gow terraced walls for the dual purpose of
providing attractive landscape planters at the northeast and
southeast portions of the project site and to take up gra o
with 3 foot retaining walls. The northern perimeter wall will .
act in the same fashion, providing a terraced planter and 6
foot high block wall for retaining purposes as a mitigation
measure for the steep terrain.
8. V-sign Review Committee: The Design Review Committee
recommended approval of the revised elevations and the
j
conceptual landscaping plan subject to revisions such as
breaking up the long linear roof line (Exhibit "E "), expanding
the entry to the building and enlarging the landscape planters
to 10 feet along the west and north property line. The
applicant requests consideration of the original elevations
(Exhibit "D ") which are a LDS church design.
C. Eguestriac: Trails Committee: The Equestrian Advisory Committee
recommended approval of t e project subject to dedication of a
20 foot community `parkway trail 'along Hillside & Haven and
providing a heavy, broom finish for the driveway crossing.
Also, the Committee felt that a single railing is an aequate
barrier.
E. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the initial Studv has been
completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part'II of the
Environmental Checklist and found no significant adverse impact
on the environment as a result of this project. If the
Commission concurs with said findings, issuance of a Negative
Declaration would be in order.
III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS; The project is consistent with the General
Plan and Development Code. The project will not be detrimental to
adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environmental
impacts. In addition, the proposed use and site plan, together
with the recommended conditions of approval, are in compliance with
:he applicable provisions of the Development Code and City
standards.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 85 -02 - RON ISHIT
July 24, 1985
Page 3
_I
l
IV. CORRESPONDENCE: ThisAtem has been advertised in The Daily Report
as a public hearing. In addition, the property was posted and
notices advertising the public hearing were! sent to all property
owners within 300 feet of the project site.
V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission 1
consider all input and elements of this project. If after such
consideration the Commission can support the facts for finditig,
there 'the, adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a
Negative Declaration would be appropriate.,
Rerectfy,lr submitted,
®°-`- -- 4 � Lam L � --
Community Development Director
JL :HF:ns
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - !,oration Map
Exhibit "8" - Site Utilization Map_
Exhibit:. "C" - Site Plan
Exhibit ^D" Original Elevatic:-z
Exhibit "E" - Reviled. Elevation4
Exhibit "F" Conceptual Landscape Plan
Exhibit "G" - .Grading Plan I
Initial Study; Part IT_
Resvlution of Approval with Conditions
a
A, - 3
Y
;4 71
AM-L
... ......
...
's POLOA
t
"'AA
t
�
f tQ
him-
10
$�
1
iim
OD
ie it
I
E
'
�i
1
• SDl1S
t•� t a�t�ttt
`as: neu PtN�y pw wssm+n •N!n'dt iwe.•a+ aLAa •>e ai s11� a>a}iayyw E� R � ,�.
y MAW
{�{ I g
Y
I
S
P.t '
O
If
c
i ce
• .'
ate— i2
� =3j
a
sfl�3
f
O
If
c
i ce
• .'
ate— i2
� =3j
a
sfl�3
O
I
s�
n
IR
{�i �41� �i32/� Q •� .
l? •�lcl 2 4[ ��.
�111111111U�
Iar.
r
Fk ::I
JI�H, r auasry
�i.
"AV r43AVH
R SIR;
xeH
W �al
Gee ti
KI/O
t4
R SIR;
xeH
W �al
Gee ti
KI/O
li
r
I all
'k, t
� #t
Hi
ur
t
if
LU
CL t` - C
��
L11
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PART II — INITIAL STUDY
B'NIRON ^MNTAL CHECKLIST
DATE:_
APPLICANT: G.. i�{ �
FILL ?IG DATE:_ i9r S. LOG NUZffiERc e%
PROTECT; 1�ElJ�«'Eit7T D����c.;�
-S %Gr2
PROJECT LOCATION: .�/0�2 R'/��- /'l,�fi/�i� d� �e�id .�,•j �''//� i
I. ENVIRON,%MNTAL THPACTS
k
(Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe", answers are required
on attached
YES MAYBE E0
9
1. Soils and Geoloov. Will the proposal have
significant results
in:
a. Unstable wound conditions or in changes in
geologic
relationships?
b. Disruptions,. displacements, compaction or
burial of the
soil?
c• .Change in topography or ground surface
contoar intervals?
/
d. The destruction, Covering or modification
Of
any unique geologic or physical features?
�_ v
e• Any Potential increase in wind or water
erosion
of soils, affecting either on or off
site conditons?
f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition?
g, Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as
earthquakes, landslides, mud-
. slides, ground failure, or'similar hazards?
h. An increase in the rate of extraction and /or
use
of any mineral resource?
2. HYdroloc . Will tine proposal have
results in: Significant
J
Page,
9
YES M_4YBE NO
a.
Changes in currents, or the course of direction
Of flowing
�II
streams, givers, or ephemeral stream
channels?
b•
Chan&L..; in absorption rates, ,drainage patterns,
or the ra'te.and
amount_ of surface water
runoff?
c.
Alterations to the course or flow of flood
waters?
a r
�
d,
'Change in the amount of surface water in any
body of water?
e.
Discharge into surface waters; or any
alteration
of surface water quality?
+fix
f.
Alteration of groundwater characteristics?
—
g.
Change in the quantity of groundwaters,
either through d1zect
additions or with -
drawals, or through -- nterference with
aquifer? an
Quality?
Quantity?
r
h.
The reduction in the amount of water other-
wise available for
pr_NiIc water supplies?
I.
Exposure of people or property to water
related hazard,
_K /
such as flooding or seiches?
f
f
I
f
3. Air Quality. Will the proposal have significant
results in: "
a.
Constant Or periodic air emissions from mobil:
or indirect sources?
/
Stationary sources?
b.
Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or
interference wita the attainment of applicable
air quality standards?
f
V
c.
Alteration of local or regional climatic
conditions, affecting air movement, moisture
or
f
temperature?
✓
4. Biota
Flora. Will the proposal have significant results
in:
a.
Change in the characteristics of species,
inclu'ing diversity, distribution, or number
of any species
_
of plants ?,. -
b.
Reduc°ioa of the numbers of any unique,•rare
or endangered species of plants?
/
Page 3
c. Introduction
YES `LaTBE ti0
of new or disruptive species of
pt:ants into an area?
i
d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural
production?
j
Fauna. Will ;die p'roposal'have'significant results
in:
a
'i
j
a. Change in the characteristics of species,
including diversity, distribution,
or numbers,
of any species of animals?
Ll
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of animals?
c. Introduction of new or disi;:ptive species of
animals into an area, or xesult in a barrier
to the migration -ar
movenent of animals?
d. Lete:Aoration or removal of existing fish or
wildlife habitat?
5. PODulation. Will the proposal have significant
i �!
results in:
a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri-
bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of
the human
population of an area?
b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or
create _a demand for additional housing?
6. Socio- Economic Factors. Will the proposal have
.�
significant results in:
a. Change in local or regional socio- economic
characteristics,
including economic or
cowercial diversity, tax rate, and
values? property
b. Will project casts be equitably distributed
._
among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers,
/
tax payers or project users?
i!
l
7. Land Use and Planning Considerations. Will the
Proposal. have significant results in?
a._ A substantial alteration of the present or
Planned land use of,an area?
I
b.
.-.,
A conflict with any designations, ob;ectives,
k'
policies, or adopted plans of an
entities? Y governmental
l
c. An impact Upon the qulaity or quantity of
_.
existing consumprive or ncn- consumptivej/�,1�
recreational opportunities?
/+
1
tCC l(
J
Page 4
AIRL
8. Transportation, Will the
YES ; ±aF3E NO
proposal have significant
results In
l'
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular
movement?
b.. Effects on existing streets, or demand for
new street construction?
j
C. Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for
new parking?
d. Substantial impact
V
upon existing transporta-
tion systems?
e• Alterations to present patterns of circula-
tion
or movement of people and /or goods?
f. Alterations to or effects on present and
_
Potential water - borne, rail, mass transit or
air traffic?
g. Increases In traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists
or pedestrians:
9- Cultural Resources. Will the g;.bposal :.ave
significant
result s in:
C
a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological,
Paleontological,
and /or historical resources?
10. Health. Safety, a, '- -jance Factors. Will the
Proposal aave significant results in:
a.. Creation of any health hazard or potent
hazard? ial health
b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards?
C. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous
substances
in the event of an accident?
d. An incre.,,e in the number of individuals
or species of vector or pathenogenic
organisms or the exposure of people to such
organi=7?
-- �/
e• ?narease in existing noise levels?
f
f.� Exposure c.`, people to potentially dangerous
noise levels?
9. The creation of objectionable odors?
pf
i
h. An increase in light or glare?
C
Paso S
f
I
YES
11.
X4-YnE �
ZL-:
Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant
results in-
a. The obstruction or degradation of
vista or view? any scenic
�f
b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive
site?
c. A conflict with the objective of designated
or potential
scenic corridors?
1 2. Uti'ities and Publ.:c Services . G.11 the proposal
1iave a significant
nee— d- for new systez5, or
01terations to the following;
• -;. Electric power?
/
d/
b. Natural or packaged gas?
/
C* Communication -- systems?
d. Water supply?
2. Wastewater facilities ?'
J91k
f. Flood control structures?
-1Z
g. Solid waste facilities ?'
h. Fire protection?
`
i. Police protection?
J. Schools?
k. Parks or other recreational facilities?
/
L M,- intenance of public facilities, including
°:,ads and flood
control facilities?
%
m. Other governmental services?
!/ l
_-
13. Enerev and Scarce Resources. Will the
�— ✓
proposal
have significant results in:
a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy?
f
b, Substantial increase in demand upon ex,sting
sources
of energy?
/
✓
c. An increase in the demand for development of
new
G •
sources of energy?
d. An increase or perpeLl.ation of tF , ",nsunptinr.
of
vin- renewable forms of energy, when feasYble
renewable sources of energy are available? /
/
f
d. hoes the project have environmental effects --t-
which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings„ either directly or indirectly?
II. DIS'.USSION OF ENVIRON%MYTAL EVALUATION (i.e., of affirmative answers to
We shove questions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures).
Page 6
` YES .4Y3E
NO
e. Substantial depletion of
any nonrenewable or
scarce natural resource?
ftt
V.
14. Mandatory Findings of Sienificance.
a• Does the project have the potential to degrade
the quality of -the
environment, substantially'
reduce thg habitat of fish
or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife Population to drop
below
sel$ sust4ining levels, threaten to
eliminate:a plant
or animal community, reduce
the number or restrict the range of a rare
or
endangered plant or animal or,
important example§
of the major periods of
California 'istory�or prehi's -ory?
s�
b. Does _:. ±hP 7.oject have the potential to achieve
short- -term,
to the disadvantage of long -term,
environmental guals? (A short -term impact
on the
enviz-�:„ment i- one which occurs in a relatively
brief, definitf,ve
perio, of time while long-
te=m impacts will endure well into the future).
c. Does the project have impacts which are
3ndividualay limited, but
cumulatively
considerable? (Cumulatively considerable
means that the incremental effects of an
individual
project are considerable when viewed
in connection with the effects of
past projects,
and urobable future projects)
d. hoes the project have environmental effects --t-
which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings„ either directly or indirectly?
II. DIS'.USSION OF ENVIRON%MYTAL EVALUATION (i.e., of affirmative answers to
We shove questions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures).
\ Page 7
III. DETE ? ='— T---- INATION,
On tna basis „ f this initial evaluation;
I find the proposed project COULD NOT have s ".significant effect
OD the environment, and a NEGATI%T DECLARATION will be prepared.
find that although the proposedfprojecL'could have a significant
�Ir/1( effect on the "environment, thefe gill not be a significant effect
in this case because the mitigation measures described on an
attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE'
DECLARATION WILL BE M- PARED.
x
I find the VO osed
P P project ',MY have ..a significant affect on the
envir =ent, and an ENVIRON LENT IMPACT REPORT is required.
Date Ply
sign, tu
Title
AV
r,
RESOLUTION NO. ,
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 85 -02 FOR RON ISHII
LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HAVEN AND HILLSIDE IN
THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
WHEREAS, on the 20th day of February, 1985, a complete application
was filed by Ron Ishii for review of the above- described project; and
WHEREAS, on the 241th "day of July, 1985, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning
Commission held a public hearing to conaider the above- described project.
follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as
SECTION 1: That the following finL.'•ngs can be met:
1
1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General
" Plan, the objectives of the Development Codc, and
the purposes, of the district in which the site is
2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to, the
public health, safety, or welfare, or materially
injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity.
3. That the proposed use .complies with each of the
applicable provisions of the vz,�?noment Code.
SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the
environment that a Negative Declaration ;is issued on July 24, 1985.
SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 85 -02 is approved
subject to the following conditi(,,as:
DESTGN REVIEW•
III
1. Provide 10 feet landscape planters along west and north t
property line,
2. Construct 20 foot wide equestrian trail along both Haven
Avenue and Hillside 'Road per City standards.
3. Design elevations for the small storage tuildin:� .-nail be
similar in materials and compatibility with' thci main
church sanctuary and shall be approved by the City Planner
before issuance of building permits.
i
Resolution No.
CUP 85 -02 - ISHII
Page 2
AM
4. Provide 6 foot block wall design with decorative cap, and
shall be approved by the Design Review Committee before
issuance of building permits.
ti APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24th DAY OF JULY, 1985.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Dennis L. Stout, Chairman
ATTEST:
Jack Lam, Secretary
I, Jack Lam, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 24th day of July, 1985, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERSt
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
r ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
O N.a�i >Y n•.- v
�LN
79 Y ay N Y
E yy 6 _ COY
ink
6�VA6Vx A=.n �OGaN ¢Vb6 N�.YL 3 40g0 i�L 0.L.OU
m
r
4 �
J N •. M L ^^ E 0.q•
9 O .22 ^ O- .�
O
sS� O N �• 0�++ O E 9 N o
r� q X.
C q y
-:a °E.. 'p
S• •Q• 6 0. 0 Cy.^ E .1 C•ayT
f � u DY � b i'N bC1uOL
N Y Y V CaT O
Y 4
00~4
1.
ISO
F � , U Q Z � 1.. C L b L6•r E t d L U
11\\ C J 0.q R 4T. +G �n 6aNi
S b
6 11yr� b E
^ 6 V t�. F E j• C � Z Ga � p
�y +�'Z � ~• ,� ,, i n d� p o p o •O o Y ppl P y-
V -p ° J oar_ ° oa na Le dca se
nom.. n Ln
T
L� `
C O q C
C o d
d q • L,�
o;zV B
B n p q
q q q O> •
j J+
V 1- Y
E vYYid t
Y O d
p
q��S�Pg9 �� O
OOdiO 0
04 O°'.L. nL YQq 0
06.E
V6 O
O Q Y C= n
n 9 Y Q O
O L Y
A 9
VOY d
Y •
6� N
Z y
96 `
yob V L
LQ� O
a
U C
rE O
YO O
a r
9E
ai
O Lp E Y
Coq Y
YyY •
dLd N..
p .
crab a.� 3 raj Y
Ots �
•4ps ^O T
o
�' A
A �
Y•' -
-vim c
u d d
66 y
E u
b =Nqu ¢OG e
e� t N
NL aNY 0.0Y Cb Y
Yc
Uq y ,., '
'O qL R
Ri O
`°,a v'i �• es s a
aab >55�� 6
N L
L L
.� n
€b °
°o > a �us� J
J�q °1�n
L d y
E •
L pQy Y
O
o~ d
y E
•6E L
0
1 \O
V,
Q.
J
1 e
d
Z
V
G7
•n
L
Q.
«yam
a °na
� %ao.�'•�o.ic
u�aida d
du
°
�
E16 d
6 +M
� ?n ovi
O
o„F �.Nq
au
e e
as
T
°~
O
++ E
E
N vin
Fn,
'y. ca
i
d
ao
Nv
Ham.. ^ =3
�u
^c
2.
fL
W ° � N
n� �
L
v >�d.
O N
n ° n O
Aft
6L •^ L
'[.°u'J�
W,CW
T"•'d�
Y' 1 N
�04
,.Nd.
a= 2 C
��r
>
O'•dq
C F
r1
u np°
N�)t
N
M �•: 9
at u
ydY
,.�
O
N
°yN1
y'L.= uyY c
>V.pN
N«
ur
_
G o,u
.•..
V d F
V O
dui
�EdAC
p L CEE N
p�p.a �4.a =E'
�E
L AE
�N
a
G. 6V
ay.
•"•10
E>
O
CC
dG
y' •�!� h1duN
' tiNA
NLF TC6
�0
9A VngO
o y
°E
OL
yy0d
N
mNy
b:
N^
3oi
°
nh.Z
° c
0.
E Lnc
ov
c A
NSUw�
e: °Ada �O io
°� °.c
au..
A «ud
•TNT
Ta
°.w
A
m O L�W d
O
m^ 2 r Yy
a yaYOi
d.
a °.L
6N .
gV�rNi
T
•:
R7
Y
Gi Y 9
V t N A E T L
T L
y
.-• O .n
N L
< 6.0 d
y. O. G
-.9u.
¢ d^
d
•+ N. L 2 2 N
CC` 2 O G. L
N N d Y+ n
V
C �
W. .- X
c
< L A+°..p
y
N 6 p
?2
GsN OL 3 dOV ^r
NVO >qa 6A =.QY
O °Y .3 TG U
AY W G °p =6G
^ M
y9N • up. O.0 L.,r C
a d EY d
L G Ob � L <
n ^�
q0 d �yFi.)C�Wp
V
nL.q w AQd
t
O y Oi C
O N mY'E
_ ?C E >^p ymcd.M
O p cpc d
° E
a °d c
V 'O •d L
N�aN.•i NON � �Ly
6a� cGcy �. dam.
JE 1° OYy U
da _ L co°
n°u ccauo'E> tL
H N4
i
11
C'
> 2U
Ni'a
i'e.
a d et
N c
e e
w n
°W
E.
N vin
Fn,
'y. ca
i
'°.° -�
ao
Nv
Ham.. ^ =3
�u
^c
2.
fL
aG a
v >�d.
O N
n ° n O
Aft
�H~
w ^. WL Aq3
6 q
Of•C wt
r w
NA d
^ m Ol
�04
,.Nd.
�a
b L c L
JyqN
Z.,
>
O'•dq
C F
c G wS
1
uG YG
u np°
N�)t
N
M �•: 9
at u
ydY
,.�
O
cF
ON LL N
°yN1
y'L.= uyY c
� °D
N«
ur
_
G o,u
.•..
V d F
G'p
A y
A
L. A 9
E
a
G O
.. t.Z y
d
yNa,
4.ONz
V)YA
:4'V -z-1 nd
?2
GsN OL 3 dOV ^r
NVO >qa 6A =.QY
O °Y .3 TG U
AY W G °p =6G
^ M
y9N • up. O.0 L.,r C
a d EY d
L G Ob � L <
n ^�
q0 d �yFi.)C�Wp
V
nL.q w AQd
t
O y Oi C
O N mY'E
_ ?C E >^p ymcd.M
O p cpc d
° E
a °d c
V 'O •d L
N�aN.•i NON � �Ly
6a� cGcy �. dam.
JE 1° OYy U
da _ L co°
n°u ccauo'E> tL
H N4
i
11
C'
E
u
d
G
W
Z
41
U
d
L
d
a a.0 cu PL c �n 'i.q w c P d ELL W
4V �� N NfO C qu -:.0�° c6 ti LTV u Ev9�
60 g y y O v
`oN a
w i< d ► N V L cC _ a O U N� � y� y>• a ..
VcE � P SL T VD dV .uta V� N C.p
vod N IIo
N
o pN
Oa p 0 ut Z +.c OY G,.., tiff "O• u AC' L L N'
a�ggee O 3
d d N c yµ V E L V V
6 my L
b N
E « «d od y up dV cN c. oY A L
GY a.�yN Y °•nY
d
'O PL Vb d LO1LyP C ad CN C
�M u PL L Lj A 6
V d•DWV L�Nd..• _ r-p
N Y V q4- .• La q n= W O '� E p L
�N �N 6 V. p, NU�Op�Ga�i -YP V Pd�y
u�� CE CM V L u°iOp L UC 6 c c � u
E � $ El
o
ml
—Z c
•
'on
L
ov
q�n
�y�IIN..o.
•V�
Na pG
�j .°.. H
DY
�P�
Nlda
'L
a
•. i.G�
LO
y�
.-
o
N
ei
Va
L
o
�m-
qa>
a
N
R.
L
E
6
°pa
yT
g
op;i
P`A�
A Ly
•
��OA
6CD.N
yO ^Qpt
NYC
a9d
u pE
ya
�
u'
�V�D
Ivt 6uW
E °
O
d
C
uN ya
Y ^
u '^
D�
aNCd
N
�LL
aipY
i a°q°E9
Vd46u CT
P
75 ,
W N
YC
we
moo
0 a s V
N °c
T d.
�::
yua"
at G
Ny
VV
V
V 6
G
TC
o
N D G
P
O C
V• O O
U p D
6 C °�
N t
Pq
C_a
Cy
U
y°C�yy
T
V q«g
uCp -N Y
N
°
qLN
^t 7Y.
Z E4 %O
•�
d ...0
t4.O C
>L
a D•
Ceprp�DL
< ++NO
'6 V4N�.
7 6a N`
4V' <O
1-r.O Nrq
60II
6Mna
Wd II�NwY°.
\``1`�II
ml
a z N Y oL ^ 9 t
" •a
_ ��� a- aA Z4
v
E d �• ° 6 +a•Y. • y rE 2u c ��
da c TY L ° c E a L 9u� � pE E q E • ` �
4.8 V u°.vO n CW C u^ O 00
d W L G d a 2 ^ W U =cu 0
cu
Yi i >9 VyyV VOA YM ` i••c•tai ;, �Ca � � 9y
'c°i
O• Neu C QIt 9+ L E OTC 4 O� y �vN Y q M �.' °•
' qp ny w o cY :-mom• ^' 2
^ '�O C` • N h- Yn.d.0 q.�a°i•r°.�
dv F
•Y YmN V r. yu,y yOEO qO V N �C9uF Yq O d d
N as °O� uqg'' Nsa uu Is-
12 z 60ed.'y a Eq
t0' dOA: aU<Vy 9 t J uC W^ n mn COY ^t y +.�
E
Y =N G p d c C
M Y 19 ° d
��.^ •ti• °EL6�n ° °6. C ^ VYtU`�• ;AOtY C d
b° U ter Y c Y:1 LO a M
^ 2•+O NUL U.O C UC's a° of du u
pp,, CC L q ^ �tsA` �A.CIw rG dd
ig-
_ VO V NE nOAId T9 NON �<
d n E 6 W W
.� 5 u 799
LiL d�
n F6 i. .Nd AA � FUW 6< L
N C 06S 4.N 6� Y 6U�
N Q ^
I I ^� Y •I NI �I ! W �)
N
S
c
f
m dz dAr
jA • Lt N dY MO ai's
O•Ny d'. V �{% a°•9y a01 M�L Yd .OL = t '.9
L N�= Y,N GO C ° NL YT
F • uq C d�G CC. • V ML �„ L.L n d d G
F. V C9 L � °•dY 90q<. d y �d YY 4^ C dy LL
S � i..r
ono i 'o. N` dM i o=ff`w N <d.<..
q .•' °v u °o A
.oVE iO Y
L
o S C Y 9 ° qd Y N °• N i n c N r
d v Ga c au.iO- 9 Go. Ut
2 n °• G Y S O T C L Y 9
�1 r6 E N m Y= n n Ca - EL oyaj
L u y tY EEr °.•L. o 54: -1
c ' O j
.mot AbY�Y d 6 A�E
69Ya LC 6 C^ <vLG
E d d L' q6 D
a oz --..x
�pGCa d OOi � � 2 . G W.a q G q a d p j� 9 O i .ncO L dd a C ° ^ d �.^ ]myd Q c E°• 'o°p mOT . a !• � ° t •d� uq G ,x
i d 'E -.,24
X— •^ t N_ oY,^ m �up 6aN d
Y nM Y
N
G ` >E
.yN
qi NL V•° NAY
Ny w 'a " j W ••M1 V
EE O 4• 4..L
< � `n � AT u � al A G ° n l Q q L C OI.. O '• Y° O. �. °
�aa ru m° Lim vrca L. f o .,at u a¢S w 1n.0 rg°p.
' H•'na VM y~ < Sir JL'Er ^ =GWC ' LC GN •,.f y. EL <
Q ~ Q2m OY d Ba WE2. 6YMV
V'
Z
V
Qj
•O
L
6.
Li
a
,Oa O C C
ITSS 45 C
a
55-i
C^�
.p m a °•�.°- N .N. n
" CS
IY� Y
m L �E
L..o �Qra n o
p e_o
s i v o ^ c.
Y ^ q ^ Y ba -
yy I
mow.
o
aL �� YO• 4y C•- v6 L ^M
� �_ +� UGC. •°j 9 W y~ dq
rn• N Y g ... nn
pe
NO 0
WuY �. CH mOW ,t'Y
I�NL �b 4a�6i 40 O
N - pp M4` • LM.�Y
�p� Y L = 0 9. G 1a Y d •Y• C
Y C A Cw. j^0 -Z Xc:T
.=.I 4Y� LCO Yd.
m• kY�.CO
Y ^O� °NrR yS.o 4LY.
C�4y t
V AYy a NUMO=
wcN� vcTw cYVM=
9 p L^
S �' w '• Y
• � Op, l `
t O,n01 U p 0 Y O L
uw
s
„OC C >O °Y.�O OO�OML
A ow`
NV4N'� FmeG Op ^Q�
C p
t S
SSE Y
pEeOi t
YOO'
YO
9 C
Z Y
O'O Y
Y
-2-
Y 0 0
`Y e
e°• P
0 N N
E`9.0 �
N L N
C C
�� 0
A Y
Y=.CM G O
O O
O•L C
0>
C! �
00
LLO�
1Y..".
t.0 . =
=
�'NZ 6
6 �Y `
`°. ON = O
OC C9eT A
AYE
wa A
Y:•- OHO. A U
U T �
A
T G Y
�. C `
w
00 °• C
C L p 0 C g
C ^° N
N Y
Y L ^ }
Cd L L H p
p e�
Ga t
t N
gY C
NL y
} C
L C L
L
N Ana �:Y t
t T ^
°�
M 6 Q
A°
w0 ¢
¢�•.y uOC�A O
O e T
u^
ia^ �C �.- A
0 Y
Y >
> C OO�W O
O� •
•+N tiV !A L
LCS nVa �
�YM
A
N
N N
N +
+11
n�
ITSS 45 C
a
55-i
C^�
.p m a °•�.°- N .N. n
" CS
IY� Y
m L �E
L..o �Qra n o
p e_o
s i v o ^ c.
Y ^ q ^ Y ba -
yy I
mow.
o
aL �� YO• 4y C•- v6 L ^M
� �_ +� UGC. •°j 9 W y~ dq
rn• N Y g ... nn
pe
NO 0
WuY �. CH mOW ,t'Y
I�NL �b 4a�6i 40 O
N - pp M4` • LM.�Y
�p� Y L = 0 9. G 1a Y d •Y• C
Y C A Cw. j^0 -Z Xc:T
.=.I 4Y� LCO Yd.
m• kY�.CO
Y ^O� °NrR yS.o 4LY.
C�4y t
V AYy a NUMO=
wcN� vcTw cYVM=
9 p L^
S �' w '• Y
• � Op, l `
t O,n01 U p 0 Y O L
uw
s
„OC C >O °Y.�O OO�OML
A ow`
NV4N'� FmeG Op ^Q�
N - pp M4` • LM.�Y
�p� Y L = 0 9. G 1a Y d •Y• C
Y C A Cw. j^0 -Z Xc:T
.=.I 4Y� LCO Yd.
m• kY�.CO
Y ^O� °NrR yS.o 4LY.
C�4y t
V AYy a NUMO=
wcN� vcTw cYVM=
9 p L^
S �' w '• Y
• � Op, l `
t O,n01 U p 0 Y O L
uw
s
„OC C >O °Y.�O OO�OML
A ow`
NV4N'� FmeG Op ^Q�
3,
�J
O
4J
V
d
O
S-
0-
N+�+`oz u
mu my i.
e.
�
G1O'
o00
oa:
z w
v a
LiYYm
Foaa«
w .v
c
«d
w
N^
o
w
O
d °
aLiCM�P
N «
�
q
m
O v
N�wyy
L,E
y W
NT
C � p N
Oy.Ni c
O� Li•. N�
au
u
M
w �. S
_
aviNL
A
T.
Y
.� °V
•Ya
A>w
<.
u
Eo _�
� .•k
° L
v
0
.wo€
ou
V
Y E
_
^ n
C T V ^
v a
t
a^
i Q
ew
w
u9
w A
4
Na�w
'Cy La.
Y 6
R i
q c
N
U
A
y
A
L 6«
qu !
a•`QO
LL C
��Aby
y C •
�•AAN
q�y0
y�
>
Cam'° •. •�.
€u
AmPC
.•Ti N V
>
Y y
w6Ed
�A
v
oN
`°« =:n •"
U
vw.wau°
�Aa °'
o
v tvq•ia a
9 C 7
C Y Y T
•a L Y
N^ Y Q
q. e Y O
G y°.
c
�L
Y L V
q
NM
t„ M S •n a•
} S O
S C
QN CHI
�Vt rZ
yy{d�Qw
A C
An9Y0.�
yp�Y.
NV 6�
Q7
•C CV~.. L'^
�Am weL 6y
y yt
Z�y:�
G �".^
wA L S
"qr,y^
pq
YE ^�
•Z'..�a
\QO
Y1c�N
.wp CC=
Cy.
hvi N^ Cw
2Rm Oppy .^ L
Ly.
LyE
CC a O
aN y y
pm
•.�
Wq
Y`�
OA
Ta..C., Tt�
�y =YL
e^Y 9� ^ O•
Sa uLAiwG
5
Obiw
AYE`
_
6
E
N
A ^_W wQ
_
Yq0 «OC
O•'YC'O.�
N
N
�Y L•ti• YE c
�°u e•w
vY��
Vim. W.YGY
oNw ^�. dYFi
d.
�u
H6W R.°
G9ON«
NOM
N7
aqs
yyw..v <6.1 L
•yn wt`..
»y
NLEU
36 u, < W
b
n m
fT
was \
„�,•
�` b
m
y o
°Y
V
m
a
4
0
w
yv U
6
o ^
C
0
u o
T J
r C
H O
9 L
m C
O1 C
r
9 I'
U
Y
a+ Y v
w
y O• � L
O � t
n u a=d
L d N u
6. V Yy
O � O
y wy�Ctw
d L•�'
� dc�
y a q
o x °o
TAN
!•9 L
qQC
Q w.
�y f
lu
a
(it
a�
v
woo
uwyN
g
«d
o
w
.a
�N
Cps
yGmE
•9L
C
Y
^ N
y
° L
v
0
�Ag
A q
ou
V
Y E
_
^ n
C T V ^
A•r
os
t
a^
i Q
ew
S.
u9
"d
'T •�
�6
Na�w
'Cy La.
EY
ao
V
c
N
^a
as >co
y
0
a^
C9
Y L
N N
N w �a tp
Y°
�°
MA
w6Ed
�A
NO N`Y
CN C
lSp
`"ray
(q
Maa
>N
wuo
p
NotN y^
O
t
EM
y
L C
6 q
^^ G1
4 Q L
Mm
fJ N A. N
.: L
U^
m.\`•mom• 11I
\ \iii ml[
N
{11
1.1
m
y o
°Y
V
m
a
4
0
w
yv U
6
o ^
C
0
u o
T J
r C
H O
9 L
m C
O1 C
r
9 I'
U
Y
a+ Y v
w
y O• � L
O � t
n u a=d
L d N u
6. V Yy
O � O
y wy�Ctw
d L•�'
� dc�
y a q
o x °o
TAN
!•9 L
qQC
Q w.
�y f
lu
a
(it
d
A
.`a
• � Y
Y IY
4�
t7
d tl
�a
a L
oc° u
S �4
N L 9
Y
� ~t
aw
O u 0
6
y
O
C
N
O
O C
R°ILti
on
N N
L
VJ
K� p
4 a
2
N
a
l U
V Y r
w O
,V
Nr
V
T N
g°
OLl
V
s U°
'n
X4
ltap.d
C LL'
i
^�r
^O
Yo
�`!t
U
r
V Y
+
Zo
Y
yqA
L.Lr WL
«
Ny L L .w..
�.� Y
M O
T
Yr•^
Fi o°
n
v «A
aN
o w
`°
` uxi
a
•' n
G
5t-
^'v
Loa
lz
von
•'�. «^ L
q.
g
oL .
S 0.,
�L vV
nu
u
v�
nv
dYY
b
^
L
C ^
i nH
•^ �
w " °
Z.
n
rnOA
NY
w °d
r S^
° L
VN
M
<
..°c.rntu
V
LAI
'vre
.5
�c
V C
�• ^ ^tl
J Y A
b N O
mu
GJc
~V
«S
p
�2. r' NE NA
LA�
e � BW
��
LpliV•�
VU ^C
_
wiN
Lr_ w~.0 Y VO
Yw
a
aiST
b
n^
Y
>uu
c
! cY .^Yi'u.'
p
•-t
�«
$n .tl
^.r
`vtl
n��
C.wg
° �
« cNi
a1ua
�y11 \Cy1
v l f
o
I
!f
d
A
.`a
• � Y
Y IY
4�
t7
d tl
�a
a L
oc° u
S �4
N L 9
Y
� ~t
aw
Y •a6
n
t+
°u
� aS�•
N rr
4 Y
O M
C G
,w
o S�
o'er ate+
Y
C L C !
yL
4 Y
n
o� �N
e�
•T Y 6r
�I �i
O u 0
6
y
O
C
N
O
"M,
on
N N
L
G
a
V Y r
'n
X4
ltap.d
C LL'
i
^�r
^O
Sw a.
u••q � _
wa ob
«V
r
+
Y
yqA
L.Lr WL
PV Vb
AAY
tl
Fi o°
8
v «A
aN
�.
Y
.L.
Cuff
.L�,b°
°o dr
LC
tly ��
G
c...
^'v
Loa
lz
von
•'�. «^ L
^
C e
v N
^acn 9s
c
b
^
L
n °
w�
d o.r
Y
rnOA
NY
O
"^
y9�
`•�F
VN
ifC VL
AOO
<
LAI
'vre
.5
�c
«
~V
1.•.
ICY.«
bp�1p
<CN
C N J Ta
w
O
VU ^C
Y •a6
n
t+
°u
� aS�•
N rr
4 Y
O M
C G
,w
o S�
o'er ate+
Y
C L C !
yL
4 Y
n
o� �N
e�
•T Y 6r
�I �i
El
E
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
( STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 24, 1985
TO: Planning Commission
FRIM: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer
I BV: Barbara Krali, Assistant Civil Engineer
SUBJECT:
,
,�,
nortnwest cornier of Hillside Road and Haven Avenue APN 201 - 101 -27
I. PROJECT AND SITE DE CRIFTION: !>{
A. Acti3n Requested: Approval of Parcel. Map.
B. Purpose Parcel No. 3 is the site for the development of a church
on tonight's ages - as C.U.P. 85 -02.
C. Location: Northwest corner of Hill, de Road and Haven Avenue.
D. Parcel Size: Parcel No. 1 .68 acres.
Parcel No: 2 - .68 acres.
Parcel No. 3 - 2.88 acres.
Total 4.24 a
E. Existing ZoninT: Very Low, (VL 2 dujac) Development District.
F. ',,`:acisting Land Use: Vacant.
G. Surroundin Land Use:
or - Existing Single Family.
South - Vacant.
East - Existing Singly Family.
West - Existing Single Family.
H. Surrounding General Plan and Development Code Designations:
North - Very Low VL u /ac.
South Very Low VL) 2 du /ac.
East - Very Low (VL 2 du /ac.
West - Very Low iN 2 du /ac.
ITEM L
r
s
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Environmental Assessment and Parcel Map 9064
July 24, 1985
Page 2
s I. Site Characteristics: This site slopes approximately 8% from north to
sout an isd— vacant,
II. ANALYSIS: Parcel No. 3 of the Tentative Parcel Map is the site for the
development
of a church which is on tonight's alenda for approval As
T C.U.P. 85 -02.
The developer has nor immediate plans for the development of Parcels 1 and
2`
Off -site improvements consisting of the construction of community t: ils
on Haven Avenue and Hillside Road and the installation
of street lights
and street trees will be comple d prior to building permit issuane- for
each parcel.
III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Also attached for you renew and consideration is
Part I ct the
a Initial Stuffy as comp' teJ ny the applicant. Staff has
completed Part II of the initial Study, the en;iron;neatal checklist, and
has conducted a field investigation. Upon completion ano review of the
Initial Study and field •investigation,
�
Staff found no adverse impacts on
the environment as a result of the :'PfOPDSed subdivision.
IV. CORRESPONDENC , Notices of 'Public Hearing haV, been sent to surrounding
"s
property awne lind placed in the Daily Report newspaper. Posting at the
site has Lc-.7tn
al,o zompleted.
V. REZOMMENDATION: It is recommended -that the Panning Co".Ission a3opt. the
a•tacie reso ution conditionally
approving Tentative Parcel Map 9064 and
authorizing the issuance of a Negative Deci;ivation.
Respectfully submitted,
BRH:BK:ko
Attachments: Vicinity Map
Tcritative Parcel Map
Resolution
Recommended ronditiors of Approval
Initial Study
_a
V
N
I
CITY OF Pty 9064
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: -VICINITY! MAP
�— --
TENTATIVE .. sM[rT t OF
R '^
MAP ^
' - IN Arl CITY OF�RAhI�,a CIICAMU4CR,CA`.FCRNA
a[«:AOmyo.arA rostaA a s.c south ur
me"D. took [ai iuil+�vt y - JAALAFY IM -
A[CI -c w took ar.rr. Mcc iascaq. _
a ete covers a a..xtuwwo.
f
v
t
x,kv
°ate,.:
, _b 4 s`ADOapuJat�
a. Tu• TIC $ I• ! • 1 [
�� i - iACPlloFip�. +.l['Otc2T.IWi � _.
w A. c..: -•... - r w.
i i l
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING C MMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA11FORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER
9064 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 9064), LOCATED ON THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF HILLSIDE ROAD AND HAVEN AVENUE
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel'Aap Number 9064, submitted by The Church of
Latter Day Saints and consisting of 3 parcels, located on the northwest corner
of Hirllside Road and Haven, Avenue, ,being a division of a portion of the south
1J2 of Lot 10 of Schoiwalters Subdivision as recorded in Book 19 of Maps, Page
75, Records of San Bernardino County; and
WHEREAS, on June 21, 1985, a formal applica --ion was submitted
requesting review of the above- described Tentative Map; and
WHEREAS, on July 24, 1985, the Planning Commission helot a duly
advertised public hearing for the above- described map.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING C%94ISSION RESOLVED AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made:
1. That &,e map 1-`consistent with the General Plan.
2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent
with she General PZan.
3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed
development.
I
4. That the proposed subdivision: and improvements will not cause
substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have
adverse affects on abutting proper -y.
SECTION 2: That this project will 'not create significant adverse
environmental i is and a Negative Declaration is issued on July 2/'., 1985.
SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Man No 9G64 is apprr%ve(i subject to
the recommen a Conditions of Approval pertair;ing thereto.
j APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS,21lyd DAY OF JULY, 1955.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF 'RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Dennis L. Stout, Chairman
ATTEST: ,
Jack Lam, secre a-Fy---
PLANNNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION
1pproval of Parcel Map 9064
July 24, 1985
Page 2
Ii
I, Jack Lam, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho.
Cucamonga,' do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly i, "and
regularly introduces, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission ofjthe
City of Ranc'io Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 24th day of July, 1985, by.the following vote -to -wit;
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:t
1!
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
1
i
4
.r
GAO GUCAMO���.
z ENVIRON1v FATAL REVIEW
APPLICATION
0 0
INITIAL STUDY - PART
��+a7 I
GENERAL p.
For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed
and submitted to the DeLelopii(ent'Review Committee through the department where
the project application; is °mode. Upon receipt of this application,_ the
Planning Division staff will - prepare Part II of the Initial Study and maize
recommendations to Planning fd6mmission. The Planning Commission will make on'
of three determinations: (1) The projact will have no significant
environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will he filed, (2. The
project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental
Impact Report will be ptepared, or (3) An additional information report
should be supplied by the applicant giving farther information concerning the
proposed project, ,
Date Filed: 29 tTangary 19135
Project Title: Church of Jesus Christ of Latter -Day Saints
Applicant's Name, Address, Telephone:__ _Ronald Ishii
717 Brea Canyon Road #1 Walnut, CA 91789 (714) 594 -7779 _
Name, Address, Telephone of Person To Be Contacted
Concerning this Project: _game
Location of Project: cornei of Haven & Hillside North /West
Assessor's Parcel No._:__ 0201 -- 101 -21 15001
List other permits necessary from local, regional, state and federal agencies
and the agency issuing such permits:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Ask
Proposed use or proposed project: Pr oposeo, one—story church and
small sto —rage building. Remaining lots be split of — to f and
—sold.
---�
Acreage of project area and sgpare footage of existing and proposed buildings,
if any:_ No p3el _tin' ;I A, ProUOSed builuing is 14 740 sq. ft.
Describe the environmental setting of the project site including information
on topography, soil stability, plants (trees), land animals, any cultural,
historical or scenic aspects, land use of surrcundiri properties. and the
description of any existing structures and their use (attach necessary
sheets):
A vac -ant low slooinc (� PR from rt �ti �.
nth and 5?� frn.��
RaGt to Went Srw.�ra1 1 rq� COl'a�le XYSi-_._ no rape --
°nd �•ery
l -Iti- e_,'Te Ceta ion_ Th _surroinrltinrr p�oDP V_}o thP_ * *� }t.`
west and a rock Haven exist si=iglelfamily delached home
the Sou }h i vac's To
and
Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative
actions, which although individually small, may 4s a whole have significant
environmental impact_ �o
M
BILL THIS PROJECT: ` YES NO
1. Create a substantial change in ground contours?
?. Create a substantial change in existing noise of produce
vibration or glare?
3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal
services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)?
4. Create changes in the existing.Zoning _ or_ General
Plan designations?
5. Remove any existing trees? How many ??
6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially
hazardous materials such as toxic substances,
flammables or explosives?. _
Explanation of any YES answers above (attach additional sheets ii; necessary):
7. Estimate the amount of sewage and solid traste materials this ro'
p sect
will ,generate daily: 6 W.C. +__2 „ urinals - min WaQP
8. Estimate the nuwber of autu and truck trips generated daily by this
project: 20 to 50 Per day & 100 to 150 on Sunda - No trucks
9. Estimate the amount of grading (cutting and filling) required for this
PrIoject; in cubic yards: 12.000 i- 12.000 fill
10. If the project involves the construction, of residential units, comp3e`.-e �
the ;Form on the next page. NQ
i CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in
the attached exhibits peesert the data and information_ required for this
initial evaluation to the best of my abili`v. and that the facts; statements,
and information presented are true and corre -t to the best of my knowledge and
belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to
be submitted before art adequate evaluation can be made by the Planning
Division.
Date: Signature
ltle
AM
t Y I -? F►—' 1
i
s .. RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION, Ask
The following information should be pi`ovided to the City of Rancho 'Cucamonga
Planning Division in order to aid the school district in assessing their
ability to accommodate the proposed residential development. Developers are
required to secure .'Setters from the school district for accommodating the
increased number of sL:;dents' nrior to issuance of buildiry permits.
i
Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No,;_,
Specific Location of Project:
PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL
1. Number of single
family units:
2. Number of multiple
family units:
3. Date proposed to
begin construction:
4. Earliest date of
Mode'a
and of Tentative
5. Bedrooms Price RangE
0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
RECOt'00ED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
LOCATION: Northwest Corner of Hiilsiaa- Rd.
& Haven Ave.'
LEGAL DESrCRIPTION: A portion of the s tth
1/2 of Lot 10 ^f.ScholwalterstSubdivision.
as recorded in Book 19 of Maps, Page 75,
records or_ds of San Bernardino County
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO: 9064
DATE FILED: June 21, 5985
ACIMBER OF LOTS: 3
GROSS ACREAGE: 4.24
ASSESSOR PARCEL NO: 201- 101 -27
DEVELOPER INNER ENGINEER /SURVEYOR
Church of Latter Day Saints !AME: Derbish & Guerra & Assoc.
C/O Ron Isnii
Brea Canyon Ro— d — 124 1,. "F" St., Suite 12
Walnut, CA 91789 On ±,rip, CA 9176"
Improvement and dedication requirements in accoruince with Title 16 of the
Hunicip -,` Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga include:, but way not be limited
to, the following:
A. Dedications and Vehicular Access
1. dedications shall be made of all interior street rights -cif -way
and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map.
X 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the
following streets:
9 additional feet on Hillside Road*
8 additional feet on Haven Avenue*
additional feet on
* row vi edes For -a 20 foct Communit7y—Tsail easement.
X 3. Corner property line radius wilt be required per City
Standards.
4. All rights of vehicular in
as follows: g egress shall be dedicated
i
5. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance ag•eements ensuring
access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all common -
roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided.bJ C.C. &R.s
AW
and shall be recorded concurrent with the map.
r�
_1_
X 6.. All existing easements lying within future right -of -way are to
be quitclaimed or delineated on the map per City Engineer's
requirements.
7. Easements for sidewalk for public use shall be dedicated to the
City where sidewalks meander, through private property,
a
1
S. Surety
X 1. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the
.satisfaction. fof the City Engineer and City Attorney,
guaranteeing completion of the public improvements prior to
building perml-k issuance for •individual parcels.
2. A lien agreement must be executed prior to recording of the map
for the followingg-
_ 3. Surety shall be posted -and an agreement executed, guaranteeing
completion of ali on -site drainage facilites necessary for
dewateHng all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and
Safety 6ivison prior to recording for
and /or prior to issuance of building pZ;mit or
C. Street Improvements
Pursuant to the f. y of Ranch Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title 16, Section
16.36.120, the scibdivider may enter into an agreement and post security
with the City guaranteeing the required construction prior to recordation
of the map and/or building permit issuance.
1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited
to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches,
parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets.
2, A minimum of -26 -foot wide pavement within a 40 -foot wide
dedicated right -of -way shall be constructed for all ha'F-
section streets.
X 3. Construct the following missing improvements:
Prior to building permit issuance for individual parcels.
Cur A.C. , Street Street A.C. - .'edian
Street Name Gutter Pvmt. Walk App, Trees_ tights Overlap Island* Other
Hillside X X X _r
Haven X X K
*Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter
**Community Trail
-2-
4. Prior to any work being "erformed in the public right-of-way,
fees shall be paid and.an encroacninent permit shall be obtained
from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other
permi'Us required.
x 5. Street improvement plans shall be prepared by a Registered
Civil Engineer and aPDro)ted by the City Engineer prior to
issuanc& of.-cn encroachment permit.
x 6. Developqi 'shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the
relocation:- o; any power poles or other existing public
utilitieq as riecessary.
7. Exi sting lines of I'L'%,v or less fronting the property shall be
unfergrounded.
X 8. Install appropriate street 'name signs, traffic control signs,
striping and marking§ with locations and types approvedsiby the c,
City Engineer.
X 9. Street lig'At locations, as required, are to be approved by the
Southern California Edison Company and the City if -Rancho
Cucamonga. Lights shall be on decorative poles wi th
undergrouod service.
X 10. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to and
approved by the Planning, Division prior to the issuance of
building pei-mit.
x 11. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks.,
Undersidewalk draitis shall be installed to City Standards.
D. REainage and Flood Control
1. Private drainage -easements for cross-lot dr-iinage shall be
required and shall be delineated or noticed on the final map.
x 2. Adeaiate provisions shall be made for accep osal
tance ant' disp
of surface drainage entering the property fr'om adjacent areas.
3. The following storm drain shall be installed to the
satisfaction of tile City Engineer
Prior to recordation ci` the map, a hydrclogic and drdinage
study for the project shall be submitted to the City Engineer
7or review.
A drainage detention basin per City Standards shall be
constructed to detain increased runoff
-3-
E. Grading
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the
Uniform Building Code, City Grading
Standards and accepted
grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in
substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading
plan.
'
X 'l.
A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer
licensed by the State of. Calieornia to
perform such work prior
to issuance of building, Kermit.
3,
A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer
or geologist and submitted at the time
of application or
grading plan check.
4.
The fin�J grading plan shall be subject to review and approval
by the Grading Committee
and shall be completed prior 'to
recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance
of
building nermit whichever comes first.
X 5.
Final grading, plans for each parcel are to be s6mitted to the
Building and Safety Division fcr
approval prior to issuance of
building permit.
F. General Requirements
and Approvals
X I.
Permits from other agencies will be requi ed as follows:
CalTrans for
i
San Bernardino aunty oo ontro . istrict
X Cucamonga County Water Cistrict for sewer and water
San Bernardino County Dust Abatement (required
prier to
issuance of a grading permit)
Other
2.
A copy of he Ccvenants, Conditions and Restrictions (C.C. &R.$)
approver, by the Cit Attorney is
required prior to recordation
of the inap.
X 3.
Pro -ride all utility serlices to each lot including sewerage,
water, electric power,
gas and telephone prior to street
construaton.
X 4.
Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to C>,ramoAga
Count; Water• District standards. A
required. lets--, of acceptance is
5.
This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval
from CalTrans /San Berna'�dino County
Flood Control District.
X 6.
Approvals have riot been secured from al'r utilities and other
interested agencies involved. Approval
of the final map will
be subject to any requirements that may be received from them.
,4-
CITY OF RANi::iG CUCAMONGA
LLOYD B. HUBBSz, r?T'i ENGINEER '
by:
L. -1
X 7.
The- "filing of the tentative map or approval of same toes riot
guarantee
that sewer treatment canacitg., will be availdblee at
the .ime building permits are requested. When building permits
are requested„ the Cucamonga County Water District will be
asked to certif•' the availability of capacity. Permits will
not be' issued un-less said certt�Ycation is received in writing.
.x B.
Iscal and M "meter Planned Trails sna ?1 be provided in accordance
with the -Trail Plan. A' detailed trail plan indiczting widths,
maximum elopes, physical conditions, fencing and weed control,
in accordance with City trail standards, shall be submitted to
and approved Eby the City Planner prior to building permit
issuance for individual parcels.
9.
Prior to recording, a 4eposit shall be prated with the City
covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments
under Assessment bistrict 82 -1 among the newly created p�kcels.
X 10.
At the time of final map submittal, the following shall be
submitted: Title Report, traverse calculations (sheets),
copies of recorded maps and -deeds used as reference and /or
showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks
referenced.
�. SPECIAL rONDITIONS
X 1.
Slope easements o:. Parcel 2 for the benefit of Parcel 3 shall
be reserved or delineated on the final map.
i
CITY OF RANi::iG CUCAMONGA
LLOYD B. HUBBSz, r?T'i ENGINEER '
by:
L. -1
xrviv� ro .:f ?. , .+ # + '#i ' %{ aU. fK.^^'KT a iT x'✓ 5 ;"
0701-02 o,7-24-85 P, C. Agenda Packet o Page 4 of 4
5
f
i
®'1
ATRITT / \T T1 d YT�Ti.r\ n w 1, s
1. BACKGROUNO:_ At their regularly scheduled meeting on May 22, 1985,
the Planning Commission dir +ected staff to prepare parking
amendments to the Industrial Area Specific Plan and the Development
f.de. The proposed parking amendment^ will deduct non- occupancy
areas from parking calculation-_ proviee a ratio for research and
development uses, and policy clarification concerning off -site
parking lots. On July 10, 1985, the Commission reviewed the draft
amendments and directed staff to define Research and Development
uses in general, and bring the draft amendments back 'before the
Commission fnf- ionsideration.
11. ANALYSIS; The initial survey results of selected California cities
—avirig a large concentration of research and development uses
revealed the average median ratio for parking is 1/350. This
figure coincides with ratios used by other cities, such as Palo
Alto (1 /300), R;verside (1/350), and Menlo Park (1/300).
In order to adopt a Research and Development parking ratio, it is
necessary to first define research and development uses for the
land use type definitions in Table III -2, 4nd then identify the
applicable subareas within the Industrial Specific Plan .(Exhibit
"C "). Staff is proposing ;,.define R &D as a separate category of
industrial use with two subcategories -. The Commission drected
staff to present a precise Oefinition for Research and Development
ITEMS M/N
Vl�'lYrnl \V11Vlyyr'lJ llL]1Y1V1Y t7j'1
S�g&.AFF R �� PORT
GU�ntQ
0
a l 7
O 0 C
DATE:
July 24, 1985 ,
f
19777
T0:
Chairman and Members otihe Planning Commission
FROM:
Jack Lam, Comnunity Development Director
BY:
.t
Howard.Fields, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT:
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC
PLAN
AMENDMENT 85 -02 - Amending Section E., Parking &
Loading
Requirements page 111 -26) to include defined
interior
building areas that can be deducted from the
overajl
parking requirements; Section E.3, Parking Spaces
Required
(page III -29) to include a parking ratio for research
and
development uses; and Table III -2, Land Use iefinitions
for research and development uses and identification of
the applicable subareas (Table III -I).
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT
85— Ofr - Amencing Section 17.04.050D concerning
off -site
parking lots to include additional language to
clarify
public safety 'ssues„
1. BACKGROUNO:_ At their regularly scheduled meeting on May 22, 1985,
the Planning Commission dir +ected staff to prepare parking
amendments to the Industrial Area Specific Plan and the Development
f.de. The proposed parking amendment^ will deduct non- occupancy
areas from parking calculation-_ proviee a ratio for research and
development uses, and policy clarification concerning off -site
parking lots. On July 10, 1985, the Commission reviewed the draft
amendments and directed staff to define Research and Development
uses in general, and bring the draft amendments back 'before the
Commission fnf- ionsideration.
11. ANALYSIS; The initial survey results of selected California cities
—avirig a large concentration of research and development uses
revealed the average median ratio for parking is 1/350. This
figure coincides with ratios used by other cities, such as Palo
Alto (1 /300), R;verside (1/350), and Menlo Park (1/300).
In order to adopt a Research and Development parking ratio, it is
necessary to first define research and development uses for the
land use type definitions in Table III -2, 4nd then identify the
applicable subareas within the Industrial Specific Plan .(Exhibit
"C "). Staff is proposing ;,.define R &D as a separate category of
industrial use with two subcategories -. The Commission drected
staff to present a precise Oefinition for Research and Development
ITEMS M/N
K
Y
k �
rye.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
EA & ISP Amendment 85.12
EA & Development Code Aoa2ndment 85 -02
July 24, 1985
Page 2
uses as a general category. The Staff is proposing the following
definition to address the Commission's concern for clarity:
"Research and Development: Uses engaged in the research,
design, an &lysisi development, and /or testing of a
product."
The two subcategories df Research and Development would be defined
as follows;
Research & Develo meat /Office: Activities typically include, tut
not limited to; bui: ding use, types resembling office more than
industrial space, but includes in addition to office space,
research and Development facilities, such as labs, acoustical
chamvers, microwave testing chamber, wind tunnels, circuit board
asscmhly rooms, "clean rooms ", and computer facilifies. Such uses
are typically less intense than pure office, but more intense than
traditional industrial space. The uses do not produce odors,
noise, vibration, or particulates which would adversely affect uses
in the same structure or on the same site. Where 24 hours on -site
surveillance is necessary, a caretaker's residence may be permitted
when approved by a Conditional Use Permit.
Research & Develo ment /Li ht Manufacturin : Activities typically
nclude, but not limited production and assembly
operations which include some R &D and office space, "product
assembly rooms" protot;pe testing, and other facilities associated
with high technology manufacturing. The uses do not produce odors,
noise, vibration, or particulate which would adversely effect uses
in the same structure or on the same site. Where 24 hours on -site
surveillance is necessary, a caretaker's residence may be permitted
when approved by a Conditional Use Permit.
Staff recommends that research and development uses would be
appropriate in -the Industrial Park and General Industrial
categories as shown in Exhibit "C ".
B. R &D /Office
Permitted Subarea - 6 and 7, 12, 16
Conditional Use Subareas 1, 3, 4, 8, 11, 13, 14
C. R &D /Light Manufacturinq
Permitted Subarea - 1 -8, 10 -14, and 16
EN
kA1 N
i
i
l�
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
EA & ISP Amendment 85 -02
EA & Development Code Amendment 85 -02
July 24, 1985
Page 3
II:l. RECOMMEND9TION: If the Planning Commission concurs with the
- language and the extent of the proposed revisions to the Industrial
Specific Plan and Development Code, approval of the attached
Resolution and recommendation of approval for the accompanying
ordinances would be appropriate.
Reipectfvfily ubmitted, -
Jac am
Community Developmen erector
JL:HF:jr
Attachments: Exhibit "A Parking ;paces Required (Section E.3) -
Industrial Specific Plan, Page III -29
Exhibit "$" -Gff -Site Parking (Section 17.04.050D)
Development Code, Page 48
Exhibit "C" - Proposed_ Changes to Summary Land' - Type
by Subarea, Industrial Specific Pl, Table
III -1, page II1 -5
Exhibit "D" - Current Summary Land Use Type by Subarea,
Table IiI -1
Exhibit "E" Subareas of the Industrial Specific Plan
Initial Study, Part 'II
Resolutions of Approval
Proposed Ordinances
IY ,
1
Parking Spaces Required E.3• Required parking spaces shall be determined
at tKe following rates:
t,
a. Warehousing P, building for
• 9 Storage;
1 space for 1,000 square feet
b. !ndustrial /Manufacturing:
i space per 500 square feet
C- Office and Administration:
•1 space per 250 square feet
d= Muiti -use tenrnt where office use
does not exceed 35% of building
area or '';pace" Buildings:1
space per 400 square feet.
E +4• 20% of al, required parking stalls shall.be
devoted to compact car use. Minimum stall
dimension shall be 81
in with and 16' in
length and marked for compact cars.
E.5. All Parkir- areas shalt be screened from
public view through the use of berms, land-
scaping material and tow walls.
E.6. All loading facilities and maneuvering areas,
LOADING DOCK LOADING
DOCK
must 66 on site with the use..
' E.7. All loading facilities shall be permitted
only in the rear and interior side yard .
MIN. so ft
areas except within the Heavy Industrial
uaLe
�•-- �j
-.-- -°
category and rail served buildings.
E:$. Aisle width to loading docks shall be a
minimum of 50' width exclusive of truck
parking area.
t
E•9. Loading docks shall be setback a minimum of
70' from street property line.
E.10. Loading facilities shall be adequately
screened from the ;,ublic view except within
the Heavy Industrial
category ; ,d Rail
Served buildings.
Minimum aisle width adjacent to loading
areas shal. ae 161 one way and 281 for two
{
way.
{
�•1�/� �
Aft f�
�
d
Y I i 17-
1
r� w
1 1i-2Q
Section 17.04.050
characteristics of operation, requirements for maintenance of landscaping
and other improvements;' establishment of development schedules or time
Emits for performance or completion; requirements for periodical review by
thn City Planner; and such other conditions as the City Planner may deem
necessary to ensure compatibility with surrounding uses, to preserve the
public health, safe +tL and web "are,.6d to enable the City Planner to make
the findings required by Section 17:04.050-E.
(a) Fence Heittht. In any district the maximum height of any fence, wall,
hedge orequiv& lent screening may be increased by a maximum two (2)
feet, where the topography of sloping Cites or a, difference in grade
between adjoining sites warrants such increase in height to maintain a
level of privacy, oi: to maintain effectiveness of screening, as
generally provided by such fence, wall, hedge or screening* in sirr liar
circumstances.
(b) Setbacks. In any Residential district, the City Planner may decrease
the minimum setback by not more than ten (10 %) percent where the
proposed setback area or yard is in character with the surrounding
neighborhood and is not required as an essentiaP. open space or
recreational amenity to the use of the site, and ?here such decrease
will not unreasonably affect abutting sites.
(c) Lot Coverage., In any Residential district, the City Planner may
increase the maximum lot coverage by not more than ten (IC K;
percent of the lot area, where such increases are necessary for
sigrificantiy improved' site planning or architectural design, creation
or maintenance of views, or otherwise facilitate highly desirable
features or amenities, and where such increase will not unreasonably
affect abutting sites.
(d) dff :ite Parkin;. The City Planner may authorize a maximum
twenty -five 2556) percent of the required parking for a use to be
located on 4 site not more than 30C feet from the site of the use for
which such parking is; required, where in his judgement such off -site
parking will serve the use equally as effectively and conveniently as
providing suds parking on the same site as- the use for which it is
required. The City Planner may require conditions as deemed
necessary to em, re utility, availability, and maintenance of such joint
use of off-sitcg+arking facilities.
f
(e) On -Bits Park!Uni The City Planner may authorize, a maxdmum
twenty- five e(25 %) percent reduction in the required on -site parking
requirements when it is proven that it will not result in a traffic
hazard or imFeet the necessary parking for the use.
rC.
(f) HeIghtht. In Pny district the City Planner may authoriz a a ten (10%)
percent increase in the maximum height limitation. Such increases
may be approved where necessary to significantly improve the site
plan it architectural design, and where scenic views or solar access
on surrounding pruperties are not affected.
Application. An application tior a Minor Eirception shall be filed with the Planning
Q X A/ V of
W.W Imp
TABLE III .
Kr ; SUMMARY LAND USE TYPE BY SUBAREA i
• PFAMRTEO USE 0 CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE
UStTYPES ,:
SUBAREAS
_=
' -
1 121,3141516171819
10
11112113114115116
MANUFACTURING
Custom
•
•
O
e
❑
c
•
•
•
•
•
a
®
e
i
-4-'-
o m
• �o
o I
s
_ • I
❑
Medium
unimum' ,p ea
;®
He
a
•
BES.EAWCkLSc DEVPJ OPM
a
c
0_•
!
tz
o
a
o c
•
DES @ARCH & DEVELOPMHWT/OFF_ICE
_RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT /.
LIGHT MANUFACTURING
a
.•
®
o
O
i
'k—
®,
it
®i
0
•
WHOLESALE. STORAGE. DISTRIBUTION -
—
�f9�i�Y:i�nry,rr�- ' ' ••
Ham_
f+
•`
-f.
'f
•c
❑`
°f.
6�
•
❑
:•,�••
®I
❑o
.•:
•e:
Q 'G
❑cs
-.
per•
_r .
COMMERCIAL _ :b -.;. •
, •r,
n�dmuiishetititieaixf
Agricultural Suppl "es and Services
•
a
0
s
101
l�Aiuma��(�a�
00
-
Automotive Fleet storage
❑
❑
❑
Automotive /Light Truck Repair Minor r.
pgirz
•
•
❑
❑
c
•
e
o
o I`o
- I
a .�
Automotive Sales _
❑
❑
LOU
°
Building Contractor is Office and Yards
•
❑
o
❑
❑
o
@
o o
T
�eriTdrogW aUact Serag
s
i
e
o'
i
e
:F3:
o
�'
1
0
0.
0
I
1• r
Building Maintenance Services
?dipg �`aPpTi aoc��als -
es
•
o
••..
Business SuPPIY R..tai Sales and Services
�Beisto'.•s�SUpPortSen��'.. --
-.
s
!
a
••
••
•
;a.
•
o.-�r�^
as:.,,,
•
A
o
•.•
I • •
'
r
-1
Communication o
EGotivemenl a e.,
Eat
ting Drining Eils
o
s
o
o
`
•
•
o
e
.
•
o
r
•
�❑
v
a
•
.a�'xi:
e
•
e a
c
e•
aand
inmen -;
Extensive impact Commercial + +
- '
s
® •
o
p
• .
I`t
Financial Irlsvrance and Renl Estate
ooda v] Beve2geal"yr"�
❑
0
❑
a
�f
o
G
;1"
C
r
•
Funeiai and Crematory Services ,
❑
�?�Y'�iuiPme�rtSalesan7R iaT' '�,•�=
Hotel /Motel .. _,
;
g
e-.: ""y�S24rs.tr 'R a
-•.
:.:•
•
r
•_'o-
�: _i
Medical/Health Care Be ry ces
�onai service's �
❑
;a
r
o
�
s
rr
•
❑
is
0
•
O `0
�..
0
Petroleum Products Storage
•
,a,
.❑_:
.
•
p
. �
a;,;;�
Ct
❑
•
'e
0
K
O
I :
❑
- _
❑
•
L
❑
GRnfesskinaf, Sernc + s,��s r
.
tional Fa
Recraa cilities
ttOsoerration
E3
(3
O
'Y
17
C3
p
p
• o
o
y�Siepaap - « 'y'" ��w• c „
Y
'•
•.
•
B
• •
q
"^dS
CIVIC
inraiisttativeCivcServices :�= ivw�w':••'
'o
•.:
- ®,
a
o
.y
:�•q_
e
• .a
.,:to7
•
�,4• ERzetlef niosinvs e TAmsspe�mbUl tiTiytFac�iities ": " 'Ng "° :�t"•,°•y', i,"
`❑
I
°
13
Public Assembly
sgety and Ufllity Smrs ` �
,,,1'0
�;u
O
13
Q
E
'0'O
O
13
-Q `
pPblic
p t7
'�p ❑ O
P
❑
t+' ?
C3
b •❑ ❑
.
p C❑ }
O ❑ O C t• 7
O
NORTH
CITY OF ITEM,
RANCHO CUCAMONTGA TITLE
PLANNING DIVLSIChv EXHIBIT C •• SCALE
A
El
i
e
■ ABLE 111.1
SUMMARY LAND USE TYPE BY SUBAREA
e PERMITTED USE ❑ CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE
USE TYPES SUBAREAS
ii 2 3 4 5 8 7' 8 91011 12131415 16
r iWANUFACTURINO
Custom
Medium El 0 0 `� 149'°�AE7�PeY�9i ZAf:JrlMSCSae • • • • • • • ® �! • ® O •
liirii�tu irr�fpaefi ea • '® ®
a o o '0
I
Heavy
WHOLESALE', STORAGE DISTRIBUTION ® • r
19F, mss# "o` 3 ' 65 f .
Heavy
COMMERCIAL ' ❑� 0 0 0 0 o d a
try'• iSiunstiai"rve>aisd:.QfSc�- �''^ ••� •i . � - ,_� •:: •- ..
Agricultural Supplies and Services • • • ® a �`
�nir�tai Cace?• „�,,
Automotive Fleet Storage ❑ 13 Q ❑ ❑
temof"rve bier T` -
Automotive/ Ught Truck Repair -Minor s • p ❑ ❑ ,
a ❑ • o '❑
�A••-utomotive Sales
Building Contractor's Office and Yards • ❑ o ❑ ❑ • ®'
Building Maintenance Senr;cc.es -s
®A • • • • ' by
rBwlciingSu�plresarld'sat' • • • r® •
Business Supply Retail Sales and Services • • ®` ® ^• w
• • • • o
Business'. jpPatSetvi' °"'"�". •? i ®". _ .•
Communication Services
a`�CAmrec�ience:Sa1es auic�bSery M -
Eating and Drinking Establishments ® o o • • e c� o • • a • • • •
�nfertainit�erti
' sF vood mpact Commercial L
r ❑
Financial, Insurance; Real Estate Services Q ❑ qY ® ❑` o
iooc3 arxi BeveragealesT��t •
Funeral and Crematory Services �° ❑ ` mm
ieaiiyEquTpmentS1.,: - n'7Re`nia� ❑
Hotel /Motel �'
w WundrY servl�e.S"r � • • r®
Medical/Health Care Services '` ° ® �®
Apersonal Services �= Q Q zo • ❑ ❑ ® p ❑ :x
Petroleum Products Storage :pia < rM 11, 9 1 p' gmz h,,
ge o t?•b7
Mi5fess�oriaCSernces ".�`.:,r. ❑ n ❑ q
Recreational Facilities
'3 ® ? •® - o •� ,E3 � q 0 a-! iepair Services
Scrap ° o • M ;' ® e
`
^
civic •E,
tiiacmntstvC ,�
� ® e rnSrnces f
',Cultural ¢Q o', s
.— rEzfensivelmpact -. ' liifj�';Facilit "*'"'a si . �• ❑ ❑ El
Public Assembly Q o _ ndL L ❑ ?ubiic Safety and i7fility Secvices'�'�,�:`"r`s.� eli ious Assembl p " " 0 '� ° .o::! 3 •1:7,=
NOTE Noninarked uses not permitted q q ❑ ❑
,'�/
A, o \ \.
• � � m c iii � � m � R' q� �-4s�
/ i l�a�r
S
E
a
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PART II - INITIAL STUDY
ENVIRONMENT3ii•CHECKLIST
DATE:
f
APPLICANT: C p'fjlyGli�d
FILING DATE: IY)�¢� �� l��S' LOG NUMBER: gt/F
PROJECT:
—cP5 =cs
vy•�JET
PROJECT LOCATION:
I.. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached
sheets).
YES MAYBE NO
1. Soils and GeoloRv. Will the proposal have
significant
results in:
a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in
geologic relationships?
"
b. Disruptions, displacerents, compaction or
burial of the soil?
-Are
c. •Change in topography or ground surface
IE
contour interval,-.2
v.
f
d. The destruction, or modification
of any unique geologic or physical features?
e• Any potential increase in wind or water
erosion of soils, affecting either on or off
site conditons?
f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition?
Cr'
g. Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud-
s21des, ground failure, or'similar hazards?
�!
`
h. An increase in the gate of extractis:n and /or
use of any mineral resource?
2. Hydrology. Will the proposal have significant
results in:
Page 2
4. Biota
Flora. Will the proposal have significant results
in:
a- Change in the characteristics of species,
Including diversity, distribution_ or number
of any species of plants?
h• Redution of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered ;species of. plants?
r MN Lb
V'/
R!'..
MR
YES MAYBE ZQ
a.
Changes in currents% or the course of direction
of flowing streams,
rivers, or ephe! tal stream
channels!
i
b.
Ch,.'iges in absorption rates,,drainage patterns,
o; the
rate and amount of surface water
runoff? _
l
V
c.
Alteratio n? to the course or flow of flood
waters?
/
d.
- Change in 'fhe amount of surface
e
water in anv
body of water?
/
C/
e.
Discharge into surface waters: or any
alteration
of surface water quality?
.. f.
Alteration of groundwater characteristics?
g.
Change it he quantity of groundwaters,
either
°,rough direct additions or with -
drawals,
or through interference with an
aquifer?
Quality?
`
Quantity?
/
h•
The reduction in the amount of water other —
wise available for public
water supplies?
i-
Exposure of people or property to water
related hazards
such as floodi.,g or seiches?
3. Air Quality, Will the proposal have significant
results in:
.,
a.
onstant or periodic air emissions from mobile
it indirect
sources?
Stationary sources?
--
b.
Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or
Interference
with the attainment of applicable
air quality standards?
c.
Alteration of local or regional climatic
conditions, affecting air movement, moisture
or temperature?
4. Biota
Flora. Will the proposal have significant results
in:
a- Change in the characteristics of species,
Including diversity, distribution_ or number
of any species of plants?
h• Redution of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered ;species of. plants?
r MN Lb
V'/
R!'..
MR
Page 3
YES *SAYBE StQ
c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of
p
plants into an area?
d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural
production?
Fauna. Will the proposal'have significant results
in:
a. Change in the characteristics of sly-ties,
including diversity, distribution, rr numbers
_
of any species of animals?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangeree Decies of animals?
c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of
animals into an area, or result in a barrier
to the migration or movement of animals?
d. Deterioration or removal of e,:eisting fish or
wildlife habitat?
S. Population. Will the proposa% have significant
results in:
a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri-
bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of
the human population of an area?
b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or
create a demand for additional housing?
6. Socio- Economic FactorR, Will the proposal have
significant results in':
a. Change in local or regional socio- economic
characteristics, including economic or
commercial diversity, tax rate, and property
values?
b. Will project costs be equitably distributed
e_
among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers,
tax payers or project users?
I/
7. Land Use and Plannine Considerations. Will the
P
proposal have significant results in?
a. A substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area?
y
b. A conflict with any designations, objectives,
policies,
tf
or adopted plans of any governmental
entities?
`
c. An impact upon the qulal;ty or quantity of
existing consumptive or non- consumptive
irecreational opportunities?
Page 4
S. Transportation. Will the
YES D NYBE NO
proposal have significant
results I.
C
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular
movement?
j
b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for
new sl=ier construction?
/
c- Bfrects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for
c/
new parking?
/
d. Substantial impact upon
existing transporta-
tion systems?
✓/
e. Alterations to present patterns of circula-
Lion
or movement of people and /or goods?
✓
f- Alterations to or effects on `resent and
Potential water- borne, rail, mass t=an_it or
air traffic?
g. Increasfs in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists
. _
or pedestrians?
f
9, Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have
significant
results in:
F
a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological,
paleontological,
and /or historical resources?
10. Health, Safety, and Nuisance pactars. Will the
proposal have significan4 results in:
a. Creation of any healt`, hazard or potential health
hazard?
/
is
b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards?
c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous
substances in the event of an accident?
d. An increase in the number of individuals
or species of vector or pathenogenic
'
organisms or the exposure of people to such
organisms?
/
e. Increase in existing noise levels?
f
f- Exposure of people to potentially dangerous
ess
noise levels?
/
g- The creation of objectionaLle odors?
- h, An increase in light or glare?
u M�� to
Page 5
11. Aesthetics- Will the rroposal have
YES art' &E NO
'
significant
results in: ,
a. The obstruction: or degradation of any scenic
vista or view?
/
r
_ t/
b. The creation Zan aesthetically offensive
size?
`
s
c. A conflict, with Fhe objective of designated
/
or potential scenic corridor:-?
a/
12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal
have a significant need for new systems, or
alterations to the following:
2. Electric powr -,r?
StY
b. Natural or packaged gas?
C. Communications systems?
d. Water supply?
I ?
/
e. Wastewater facilities?
f. Flood
control structures?
vi
r
g. Solid waste facilities?
I
h. lore protection?
I. Police protection?
t
J. Schools?
f
k. Parks or other recreational facilities?
-
1 Maintenance of public facilities, including
I,
roads and flood control facilities?
m. Other governmental services?
Y
13. Eneret and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal
have significant results in.
a. Use of substantial v z excessive fuel or energy?
r
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing
sources of enerW
c. An increase in the demand for development of
new
sources of energy?
✓'
d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumption
of non - renewable forms of energy, when feasible
j
renewable sources of energy are available?
Y/
M hA �3
- --
N
i . t.�..
Page 6
YES' MAYBE No
e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or r�r
scarce natural resourite
14. Mandatory Fin in s of Significr ce.
a. Does the project have the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the, habitat fist►
of or wildlife species,
cause a fish ar wildlife population to drop
below self sustaining leiels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce
the
nue.ar nr restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or
an, tmal or eliminate
important examples of the major
periods of
California history or prehistory?
1. Does the project have the potential t5,achieve
cohort -term, to
the disadvantage of long -term,
environmental $oaif;;? (A short-term impact
on the
environment is one which occurs in a relatively
brief,
definit ve period of time while long-
term Impacts will endure well into the future).
V /
c. Does the project have impl,cts, which are
Individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (Cumulatively considerable
means that the incremental effects of an
individual project are considerable when viewed
In
connection with the effects of past projects,
and probable future projects).
✓
d. Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause sabstant ?al *,2dverse effects
on human beings, t!ther directly or indirectly?
_
II. DISCUSSION OF ENL'IRO?I`iEjTAL I;yALUMOY (i.e., of affirmative answers
the above questions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures)_
to
_ �-! /N \L-
Page 7
,r
.,,. IIY. DETE3' ".I \ATI0:1
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
2 I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect
on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant*.
effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect
j in this case because the mitigation measures described on an
attached sheet have been added to thepir)ject.. A NEGATIVE
k DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.
1---� I find the proposed project 'MAY have a significant effect on the
j� envirnment, and an ��jVIRONMMNT IMPACT REPORT is required-,
Date U, t 19f
S�Y .
G Signet e
Title
CITY Ok RANCHO CUCAMONGa I
PART II INITIAL STL*DY
ENVIRON:fE iTAL%CHECKLIST
DATE:!�a
APPLICANT: {
FILING DATE. _ s ?4_
PROJECT:-'- »�[1G.31 /LClGc',t/S +;5 r�2daj
r,,el/y G'iegi.P/�c c
PROJECT LOCATION:
I. E*JVIRO :fENTAL IMPAC- 9f• '!STi�i'.lsC:� s / �,,� _`, y
6
Explanation of all "yes"
she Pts} . and "maybe" answers are required on attached j
J
YE` M-4YBE N
1. soils and Geolozv. Will the Prcposal have
significant
0
1
results in:
a.
Unstable ground conditions or in changes in
geologic relationships?
v✓
b.
Disruptions,. displacements, compaction or
burial
of the soil?
y.-
c.
.Change in topography or grour,
contour intervals?
d,
The destruction, covering or modificatio
of
~
any unique geologic or phy,ical featurn es,
v'
e,
:ny potential increase in wind or water
erosion
~
of soils, affecting either on or off
Site conditons?'-
f.
Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition?
g.
Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as
eu_chquzkes, landslides, mud -
slides, ground failure, or'similar hazards?
ii.
An increase in the rate of extraction and /or
a
Ise of any mineral resource?
/
trill the Przposal have significant
1
Page
2
YES MAYBE :;0
a.
Changes in currents, or the course of direction
Of flowing streams,
rivers, or ephemeral stream
channels?
/
b•
Changes in absorption rates, •drainage patterns.
or the rate, and amount of surface water
runoff?
c.
Alteration's to the -- or flow of flood
waters?
{
✓
_
a.
Change '_n�the amount of surface water in;anv
body of
water?
e.
Discharge into surfaca waters, or any
alteration of surface water quality?
f.
Alteration of groundwater characteristics?
g.
Change in the quantity of groundwaters,
—✓
eithel r'augh direct additions or with -
drawa' or through interference with an
aquif_
Quality?
Qrantity?
h.
Tha reduction in the amount of water other-
wise available for public water supplies?
/
I.
Exposure o° people or property to water
—L!
related hazards such as flooding or seiches?
3. Air
Quay, Will the proposal have significant
{
resu__.S in:
a.
Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile
or indirr;ct sources?
f
Statior._y sources?
J
b.
Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or
interference with the attainment of applicable
air quality standards?
e.
Alteration of local or regional climatic
condiliotts, affecting air movement, moisture
or temperature?
4. Biota
r'iova. Will the proposal have significant results .
a.
Change in the characteristics of species,
Including diversity, distritution, or number
of any species of plants?
b.
Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered specter!; of plants?
M / k-� \77
--
I
14
IL
Planned land use of an area? V/
b. A conflict with any designations, objectives,
Policies, or adopted plans of any governmental
,entities?
-
c. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of
existing consumptive or non - consumptive
recreational opportunities?
Page 3
YES ;0
c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of
ANk
Plants into an area?
d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural
production ?'
V
Fauna. Will t'he p=eposal'have "significant: results
in:
a. Change in the characteristics of species,
including diversity, d!.stribution, )r numbers
of any species of animals?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of animals?
c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of
animals into an area, or result in a barz>er
to the migration or movement of animalpi
d. Deterioration or removal of ex
wildlife fis� or
wildlife habitat. ?
/
5. Population. 'Will the nronos,11 have significant
results in:
a. Will the proposal-alter the location, distri-
bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of
the human
population of an area?
f
b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or
create a demand for additional housing?
6. .SOcio- Economic Factors. Will the proposal have
significant
- —✓
results in:
a. Change im local or regional socio- economic
characteristics, including economic or
commercial diversity, tax rate, and property
values?
Y—
b. Will project costs be equitably distributed
among project beneficiaries, 3.e., buyers,
tax payers or project users?
7. Land Use and Planning Considerations. Will the
1 —posal have significant results in?
a. A substanu_,.alteration of the present
Planned land use of an area? V/
b. A conflict with any designations, objectives,
Policies, or adopted plans of any governmental
,entities?
-
c. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of
existing consumptive or non - consumptive
recreational opportunities?
Page 4
r
r
YES ;UiY9E NQ
8. Transucrtation. Wit the proposal have significant
results iac:'�
"
t
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular
i
movement?
J
b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for
—
new street construction?
c. Effects on :existing parking facilities,
or
demand for new parking?
d. Substantial impacttUpon existing transporta-
tion systems?
,/
Q. Alterations to present patterns of circula-
tion
or movement of people ,and /or goods?
f. Alterations to or effects on present and
Potential water -borne, rail, mass transit or
air traffic?
✓
$. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles
bicyclis *s
_—
or pedestrians?
r
_Y
9. Cultural al Resources. Vil,l the proposal have
significant results in:
a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological,
paleontological, and /or historical resources?
10. Health, Safety, and Nuisance Factors. Will the
proposal have significant results in
k
4- Creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazard?
b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards'.
e. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous
substances in the event of an accident?
f
h.
d. An increase in the number of individuals
j
or species of vector or pathenngenia
organisms or the exposure of people to such
p
Organisms?
e. Increase in existing noise levels?
�.
f. Exposure of people to
P potentially dangerous
~-
noise levels?
Ask
g. The creation of objectionable, odors?
h• An increase in light or glare ?"
Page 5
11.
Y +S :LYPiE NO
Aesthetics, Will the Proposal have significant
results in;
a. The obstruction or degradation of
any acenic
Vista or tee?
b. The creation of "an aesthaC�cally offensiN
site ?.:
tJ
f
c. A conflictwith the objective of designated
or potential scenic corridors?
12. Utilities and Public Services. W�11 the
have
propo�:--1
a significant need far new systems, or
alterations
to the following;
a. Electz-t°
c power.
r
b. Natural or packaged gas?
gf
e- Communications systezz?
d. Water supply?
e. Wastewater facilities?
f. Flood control structures?
g, Solid waste facilities?
h. Fire protection?
I
i. Police protection?
J. Schools?
k• Parks or other recreational facilities?
1. 'Uintsnauce of pubAic facilities, including
'r
roads and flood cartrol facilities?
'n. Other governments,. services?
� I
1
13. Eneret and Scarce Resources.' Will the proposal
have significant
r t/
results int
a. Ilse of substantial or excessive fuel or energy?
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing
sources of energy?
c. An increase in the demand for development of
nest sources of energy?
f
d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumption
of non - renewable forms of energy, when feasible
renewable sources "available?
%
of energy are
V
s'
Page 6
YES
MAYBE NO
e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or
scarce natural resource?
14. Mandatory Findings of SieriEicanee
a. '[toes the project have the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment, zubstantia ?3y
reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife population to drop -
below self sustaining levels, threatio to
F
eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce
=
the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or, animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
b. Does the `,
project have the potential tp' achieve
short -term, to the disadvant ^$e Of long - term,
environmental goals? (A short - I term impact on the
environment is one which oecul- .-In a relative'ly
brief, definitive,psriod of time vhile long -
tern impacts will endure well into the future).
✓f
c- -.Does %be project have impacts which are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (Cumulatively considel:abl�
means that the incremental
effects of a4,b
individual .project are considerable when viewed
in connection with the effects of past projects,
and probable future projects).
d. Does the project have environmental effects
'
which will cause substantial adverse effects
1
an human beings, either directly or indirectly?
—'
II. DISCUSSTON OF EMIRO*N"ENTAL EVALUATION (i.e., axfirmative
pp
r
answers to
the above questions plas a discussion of proposed mitigation measures).
F
� 4
Page 7
i IIT. DETERI,,--- 'INyATIO,
On the basis of this initial evaluation;
t find the proposed project C46'LD NOT h.tve a significant effect . -.
on the envizonabnt, and a T'EC.TICE D£CLAR•ATIoN will be prepay -::
�( I find that altbbugh the proposed project could have a significant
J effect on the environment, there Will not be a significant effect
in this case because the mitigation measures lescribed on an
attached sheet have been added to, the project.. A NEGATIVE
VECI.ARATION WILL Es PREPARED.
I'find the proposed project ;LAY have a- significant effect on the
I envirniment, and an EMVIRObO. T V1PACT REPORT is required.
i
Date
/ SignarArre
f Title
4
;r
F
.ti
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 85 -02 REGARDING SECTION
17.04.0500, OFF -SITE PARKING LOTS
WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of May 1985, the Planning Corniiission
directed staff to prepare an amendment to the City's Development Code related
to Section 17,04.050D, Off -site Parking lots; and,
WHEREAS, on the 24th day of July, 1985 the Planning Commission held a
duly advertised public hearing.
SECTION ?ice The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the
following finding!;;
1. That the amlendment <s wart -anted in order to avoid
traffic c -Inflicts and enhance pedestrian safety.
2. That the proposed amendment would not have a
significant impact on the environment; and
3. That the proposed amendment is consistent with the
Tip policies of the General ;Flan.
SECTION 2: That the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commissioii has found
that this amendment will not create a: significant adverse impact on the
environment and recommends issuance of a Negative' Declaration on July 24,
1985. I
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED.
1. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the
City Council approve and adopt Development Code
Amendment 85 -02, regarding off -site parking lots.
2. That a certified copy of this Resolution and related
n,tterial hereby adopted by the Planning Commission ,
s.9all be forwarded to the City Council.
Ask
G
E
Resolution No
Development Cade Ameh6went 8S -n2
Page 2
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24th DAY OF JULY, 1985.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
8Y.
Dennis L. Stout, Chairman
ATTEST
Jack Lam, Secretary _
I, Jack Lam, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoi.q Resolution was dL-.ly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by t` +,e Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 24th day of July, 1985, by the foilowing'8.; ,te-to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
Aft
i ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
4
{
f � '
t
r:
ORDINANCE N0,
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 17, SECTION
17.04.050D OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE, IN RELATION TO OFF -SATE
PARKING. I
The City Council- of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does
ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: The following Section is hereby added
to Section
17.04.050D, Off -site Parkine Lots, to as follows:
Off -S-te_ Parking: The City Planner may au0drize a
maximum twenty -five (25), percent of the required parking
for a use to be located on a contiguous site, not more
than 300 feet from the building entrance:,,on the site for
the use for which such parking,will serve the use equally
as effectively and conveniently as providing such parking
on the same site as the use for which it is required.
The City Planner may require conditions as deemed
necessary to ensure utility, availability, and
maintenance of joint use of off -site park:4ng facilities.
The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause
the same to
be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least
once in The
Daily Rep, °,rt, a newspaper of general circulation published in
the City of
Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga,
California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this * day of *, 19 *.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Jon D. Mikels, Mayor
ATTEST:
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
"t
.a
�/h as
Resolution N ^.
Page 2
1, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET,, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a
regular (special, adjourned)_, meeting of Ahe Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga held on the * day of *, 19**; "and was finally passed at a regular
(special, adjourned) meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga held un the * day of *, 19k*.
Executed this *,day of *, 1985 at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk Viz_
LZ
0
21-
E
1
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 85 -02, SECTION E.,
PARKING AND LOADING REQUIREMENTS ({g. III -26) TO INCLUDE
DEFINED INTERIOR BUILDING AREAS THAT CAN BE DEDUCTED FROM
THE OVERALL PARKING REQUIREMENTS; SECTION E.3, PARKING
SPACES REQUIRED, (pg. I1i -29) TO TNCLUDE A PARKING RATIO
FOR RESEARCH & "DEVELOPMENT USES; AND TABLE III -2, LAND
USE DEFINITIONS, FOR RRESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT USES AND
IDENTIFICATION OF THE APPLICABLE SUBAREAS (TABLE III -1).
WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of Mays, 1985, the Planning Commission
directed staff to prepare an amendment to the Industrial Area Specific Tlan;
aT.d,
WHEREAS, on the 24th day of Sul,. 1985, the Planning Commissin held a
duly advertised public hearing.
SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has= rade the
following fl-n-dings:
That the amendment t; warranted in order to provide
a parking ratio for Research and Developmcat w,;ses
and define interior building areas ,that can be
deducted from the overall parking requirements.
2. That the proposed amendment would not have
significant impacts on the environment, and,
3. That taw proposed amendment is consistent with the
policies•ae the General Flan.
SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that
this amendment will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment
and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on July 24, 1985.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RES01,VED:
1. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the
City Council approve and adopt Industrial Area
Specific Plan Amendment 85 -02 regarding a parking
ratio for research and develop.nent uses and define
interior building areas that :an be deducted from
the general parking requirement's.
2. That a certified copy of this resolution and related
material hereby adopted bi the Planning Commission
shall be forwarded to the City Council. >=
Z' I K cX7
`l
Resolution No.
Page 2
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS * DAY OF *, I9 *.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCH0.000AMONGA
BY: W
Dennis L. tout, ChairmFri r
AI EST•
•
Jack Lam, Secretary
I, Jack Lam, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Cowmission held
on the 24th day of July, 1985, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
L
E
1 k.
IL
IF
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION `F THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE INDUSTRIAL AREA
SPECIFIC PLAN REGARDING PARtt,-iG STANDARDS FOR RESEARCH &
DEVELOPMENT AND DELINEATING INTERIOR BUILDING AREAS THAT
CAN BE DEDUCTED FROM PARKING REQUIREMENTS
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public
hearing on July 2¢, 1985, in order to consider amending the Industrial Area
Specific Plan; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did recommend amending the
Industrial Area Specific Plan to provide for a parking ratio for research and
development uses and deductible areas from parking requirements; and
WHEREAS', the City Council held a duly advertised public hearing ir.
order to consider amending the Industrial Area Specific Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga does hereby amend the Industrial Area Specific Plan as
follows:
SECTION 1: That Part III, Table 111 -2 (Page III -6), Land Use Types
Definitions, be amended to define Research and Development and two
subcategories:
1. Research and Development: Uses engaged in the
research, 0-ftsign, analysis, development, and /or
testing of a product.
2. Research & Developm_ent /Office: Activities typically
include, but not limited to; building /use types
resembling office mire than industrial space, but
includes in addition to office space, research and
devalopment facilities, such as circuit board
assembly rooms, "clean rooms", and computer
facilities. Such uses are typically less _intense
than pure office, but more intense man traditional
industrial space. The uses do not produce odors,
noise, vibration, or particulates which would
adversely affect uses in the same structure or on
the same site. There 24 hours on-site surveillance
is necessary, a caretaker's residence may be
permitted when a;iroved by a Conditional Use Permit.
3. Research & Development /Light Manufacturing:
Activities typically include, but not limited to:
"high- tech" pre-duct ~on and assembly operations which
include some R &D and office space, "product assembly
rooms" and other facilities associated with high
technology manufacturing. The uses do not produce
odors, noise, vibration', or particulate which would
adversely affect uses in the same structure or on
the same site. Where 24 hours on -site surveillance
is necessary, a caretaker's residence may be
permitted when approved by a Conditional Use Permit.
M/N a`1
A 7,
Resolution No.
Page 2
f
SECTION 2: That Part III, Table III -1 (page I11 -5), �,umnary of land
use type y Suk.irea, be amended to 'include research and development uses in
the Industrial Park and General Industrial categories as follows::
!!?,D /Off ice
Termtte--d— Subareas - 6 and 7, 12, 16
Conditional Use Subareas - 1, 3, 4, 8, 11, 13, 14
R&D/Light Manufacturin
Permittz ubareas - 1 -8, 10 -14, and 16
SECTION 3: That Section E.;3 Parking Spaces Required (page III -29) be
amended to add Subsection e, as follows:
e. Research & Development: 1 space per 350 Square Feet
SECTION 4: That Section E.3, Parking Spaces Required (page 221 -24)
be amended do add Subsection f as f;ilows:
f. Following interior building areas can be deducted
from the overall parking requirementse
electrical /mechanical rooms, elevator shafts,
stairwells, and multi -story lobbies. Adft
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, tliat the City Council finds that this
amendment will not cause significant adverse impacts upon the environment and
issues a Negative Deciara"iion for this amendment.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this * day of k, 19*.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Jon D. Mikels, Mayor
ATTEST:
Beverly A. Authelet, City Olen.
M t \�3 0
Resolution No. -
Page 3
I, BEVERLY A. AUTHEM, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, do, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed,
approved, and adopted by- the..Xity Council:of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at
a regular (special, adjourned) meeting of said City Council held on the * day
of *, 19 * *.
x
Executed this *+day of *, 19** at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
-Beverly A.'Authelet, City Clerk
4_
Aft
1
I
N1 /N 3k
NE-1
kill x yr nluvk,aav kjuct ft1ViNkTA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 24,M >1g85 f
rat
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
i
FROM: Jack Lamp Commpnity�Development Director
BY: Dan Coleman,, Senior Planner'
SUBJFCT: DEVELOPMENT REVY W 85 -22 - MARGS CINEMA - Development of
a six -plex wavlip theatre • of 5,188 square feet, on
thirteen acr4:s of ;and located on the northwest corner of
Foothill and Haven (Virginia Dare Center), in the General.
Commercial (GC District), APN - 1077- 104 -01 and 03„
Related File - CUP 83 -07
I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTIONc
A. Action Reouestedz Approval of ,site plan, elevations and review
of shared parEng concept.
B. Purpose: Development of a 1,800 seat theatre.
C. Location: Northwest: corner rr Foothill and Haven (Exhibit
�A�� .
D. Parcel Size: 13 acres.
E'. Existing Zoning: General Commercial
F. Existing Land Use: Vacant
G. Surrounding Land Use and Zonin
North - Vacant, General Commercial
South - Vacant, Office Professional
East - Vacant, Community Commercial
West Vacant, General Commercial
H. Site Characteristics: Former Garrett Winery site which has
been regraded and Phase I is under construction. The site
slopes at approximately 2% grade.
ITEM 0 `
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
OR 85 -22 - Edwards Cinema
July 24, 1585
Page #2
II'. ANALYSIS•
�+
A. General: On December 12,e"19.;;, the Planning Commission
approved a revised master plan --or the Virginia Dare Center`
which includdd the proposed 1,800 seat theatre (Exhibit 'B ").
This change .,in use- provides for considerably more parking
demand than ,'was formally shown under the original concept
plan. Therefore,. it tivas necessary to consider a shared parking
program tinder the tF eatre propo$al consistent with the shared
'
parking provisions in the. Development Code. In addition, the
theater site Milan proposes to eliminate nine parking spaces in
front of the theatre to create a convenient drop -off point akd`
larger open plaza area. In addition, the Design Review
Committee recommended that ,Staff analyze the shared parking
concept to assure that substantial conflict will not exist
between the office and theat•.,e users. The attached table-
(Exhibit "F "), indicates that if all businesses were open at
full capacity, a total of 1,V.6 parking 'spaces would be
necessaMy versus 384 provided. In other words, if the theater
opened mid -day, there is a 100% shared parking overlap during
"business" hours until about 5:30 p.m. Conflict between
office /restaurant users and cinema pT',rons will reach its peak
during the summer months. In response to this concern, the
Christeson Company has indicated their willingness to reserve
an office pad until such time as the theater =and remaining uses
are fully established. Staff would recommend that a new
parking analysis be provided at that lime to determine if a
confliet exists.
B. Options: The following options should be considered relative
to shared parking
1. Defer construction of an office building until
theater and other uses are fully established for one
year, or
2. Limit matinees (eg. #screens), on weekdays, subject
to annual review of parking, or
3. No matinees during daytime hours on weekdays.
C. Design Review Committee: The Design Review recommended
approval of the proposed elevations as consistent with the
design theme' of the Virginia Dare Center. However, the
Committee expressed concern with the permissibility of the
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DR 85 -22 - Edwards Cinema "
July 24, 1985
Page #3
light bulb strip on the south elevation. As the Commission
will recall, recent interpretation by the Commission and the
City Council concerning the Video Zone was that a light bu?b
rip is defined as a sign and could not be permitto -`in
addition to the other wall signs proposed under the sign
regulations for a business within a shopping center. Whereas,
the Ordinance regulations for movie theaters would not
Prohibbit_ the ljght bulb strip. The Sign Ordinance provides
flexibility for f,erta-in uses, such as theaters and regional
malls, to develop uniform sign programs. Further, the Sign
Ordinance does of establish any limitatlun on the "type,
number, sizz or',_ height of signage for a movie theater. The
Sign Ordinance i"equirEn the Planning Commission to approve the
conceptual sign program fur the theater, as illustrated on the
attached elevations (Exhibit "D ").
D. Envirc:imental Assessment: The Planning Coms-0ssion issued a
Negative Declaration on 3une 8, 1983. No -ther action is
required.
III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the
Development Code and General Plan.' The project will not cause
detriment to adjacent properties or cause significan °environmental
impacts. The proposed site plan design and elevations together
with the recommended. conditions and compliance With the applicable
regulations of the De- ,I-Dpment Lode.
IV. RECOMMENDATIOA1: It is recommended that the Planning Commission
review the information provided and _select from the options
regarding shared parking. If the Planning Commission can support
the Facts for ;Findings, a Resolution of Approval is attached.
Respectfully sibmitted,
i Jac Lam
Community Developnt6i: Director
RG:DC:cv
t
Attachments: Letter from Architect
Exhibit "A" - Location ,lap
Exhibit: "B" - Master Plan
Exhibit "C" - Revised Master Plan
Exhibit 91D" - Elevations
Exhibit "E" - Grading Plan
Exhibit "F" Parking Calculations
Resolution of .Approval with Conditions
a% a,
3434 Via Lido, Suite 250, Newport Beach, C"�._Ifomia 92663 (714) 675-9901
6e 24, 1985
�,anninc! �ommission
ItY of Rancho Cucamonqa�
B20 Baseline Road, P.O. Box 807
6ncho Cucamonga, California 91730
e: Virginia Dare Winery Centre Theatre Complex
�ntl ement,
is letter is in regard to the proposed,decorative lightingscheme for the
'wards Theatres. In the C ty of Rancho Cucamonga,apy "fixture
---
splaying --- lights, --- on a building --- wall, --- for the purpose of ---
�lling visual attention to any place.. --- or activity" is deemed to be a.sign
�d therefore governed by the City's -$`Ign Ordinance-
are in total agreement with the Declaration of Need wherein signage must be
"onsistent with the goals and objectives
of the community" and provisions are
,cessary to "ensure that the special. character 'and image the -community iss
riving for can be obtainedwhile servingbusiness needs in the community".
o not believe that anyone would not agree that the Virginia Dare'Winery
elopment is a place with llspp_�ial
character and image" within the City of
icho Cucamorrgx,� The lighting design of the theatre CoRplex, simple patterns
I low level
40 watt exposed bulbs placed twelve inches on center, is borrowed
!-ectly from the entertainment pavilions of the early 1900's
and is most
isistent with other historically referEiced design elements of the total
)ject.
tgn rdinance does not specifically address projects that centa.' upon
ptive Oreuse, rehabilitation or other developments that
must receive the
Proval of the Historical Society.. However, the "Hardships Cases" clause
P-ms to be the catch-all that permits non-conforming lightiag design
op r *at
.ropriate to developments like the Virginia Dare Winery
project.
E Planning Commission i
City of Rancho Cucamonga "
June 24, 1985
Page two
L The following is that portion of the Sign Ordinance that we ask the Planning_
Commission to apply to this project:
"The Planning Commission shall use the following findings for
determining that an extreme and unusual circumstance exists:.':.
k -
R (a) The site has a unique character or features that causes
visibility problems.
(b) The sign does not create a traffic hazard,
(c) The sign does not create a visual blight to the community.
k(d) The sign does not adversely affect adjacent propert as.
9� (e) The sign is properly maintained and structurally sound.
(f) No other signing alternative or design would be feasible or
be able to ,jrovide reasonable signing in accordance with
this ordinance.
The theatre is placed in the interior of the overall site plan, approximately
300 feet from Haven and 500 feet from Foothill Blvd., thereby creating a
visibility problem for a major entertainment center as per (a) above.
As for (b) through (f), we submit that the lighting design or "sign" meets all
of the above criteria for approval and request your favorable action in
approving the lighting d ^sign for the Edwards Theatre pruiect..
Sincerel ,
George Bissell , FAIR
GB:ktb
cc: Jim.S-dwards
O~ S
r`
�.CI
*(I
P
:t
G
O � "��.•. FORTH
CITY OF
ITEM:
RANCHO CLTC�UMON"GA TITLE= E "�fr, %�
PUNNING DI`'LSIO��I EXHIBIT- _ LE: F ��
is
LIZ
k, i
«t3
�V
,p �!��y�tp�e,��, • Haan �y.���D 'y
.'.lRlu:,!!4"� !1Q��f!!�_`�t7nJ, vuw-.f m ' 1 '• ' �a
's
qS}Sr
K ,
is Ift.
I OF e!
r;�E a §5■ � E . Z
13
t�� I�
+6F � ra
UIRM !:. x!01 11.1ill !
AA
El
t W
t ;p
F i .
1\
i
� t{ d
ui
a
\
N
t
+ .;
J
L]
cc
2
Y•_.��26
�...
4�t
9
6/25/85
VIRGINIA DARE CENTER - PARKING ANALYSIS
Theater 1800 seats @ 1/4 seats 455 Cars
Office /Retail 146,500 s.f. @ 11250 s.f. 586 Cars V
Restaurant
Del Taco 1,900 s.f. @ 1/75 s,f. 25 Cars
Spires 6,000 s.f. @ 1 /100 s.f. 60 Cars
Dinnerhouse 6,000 s.f. @ 11100 s.f. 60 Cars
Other (Food Court) 4,000 s.f. @ 1 /100 s.f. 40 Cars
.Sub Total 17,900 s.f. 185 Cars
Office /Retail 586
Restaurant 185
Theater 455
Total Required 1226
_ Total Provided -784
Shared Parking 442
NORTH
t CITY OF ITEM: �-
�' RANCHO CUCAMONGA TIT S:
PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT --1— SCAL&-
RESOLUTION MO. --
A RESOLUTIt';i OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 8522 LOCATED AT THE
NORTHWESt CORNER OF HAVEN AND FOOTHILL; rah THE GENERAL
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT DISTRICT
WHEREAS, on the 12th day of June, 1985, a complete application was
I'Ved by Edwards Cinema for design review of the above- described project; and
WHEREAS, on the 24th day of July, 1985, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning
Cozimission held a meeting to consider the above- described project.
follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as
SECTION 1: That the following car, be met:
I. That the proposed project is consistent with the
objectives of the General Plan; and
2. That the proposed use is in accord with the
objective of the Development Code and the purposes
of the district in which the site is located; and
3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of
the applicable provisions of the Development Code;
and
4. That the proposed use, together with the condition,
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety, or welfare, or materially
injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity,
SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the
environments that a Negative Declaration was issued on June 8, 1983.
SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 85 -22 is approved subject to
the following conditions and attached Standard Conditions:
LasiRn Review
1. All pertinent corditions of
Resolution 83 -79, shall apply.
CUP 83 -07, as contained in
Construction shall include a parking lot with minimum of 455
parking spaces within 300 feet.
d -it
a
t 3.
Under the current shared parking concept, the construction of
one of the office pads adjacent to the theater must be deferred
until one year after the theater has opened, and all other uses
'
have been established and open to the public. At such time,
the applicant shall submit a detailed .parking analysis to
determine if there is adequate parking For all uses. This
z
study shall be reviewed by the Planning Comm'ssion. Ii` a
conflict exists between the theater and other uses, then the
Planning ;Commirsion shall consider reduction in the square
footage of the_unbuilt remaining office building in an amount
commensurate withi the parking overlap and /or limitation on the
hours of opevAtion of the cinema.
4
A textured treatment shall be used in the pedestrian walkway
underneath the arbor that runs through the site, including
across the parking lot.
5.
The arbors sNl l be planted with vines, and creeping va, eties
of vines or ivy shall he utili2ed against wall ,surfaces
throughout the project reminiscent of the original winery.
�.
'
Adequate lighting shall be provided on all sides of building
for the safety ar.1 security of theater patrons.
7.
Proper crowd control facilities and management shall be
provides for waiting lines to ensure that theater patrons do
not block access to adjacent buildings or conflict with
vehicular circulation.
8.
Grand openings and other special events, such as movie
E
premieres, shall r ?quire review and approval of a Tenporary Use
Pera,it by the Planning Division.
9.
Trash enclosure /transformer location shall be modified to
;provide access to .the satisfaction of the Foothill Fire
District,
Engineeripg Division:
All pertinent conditions of PM 8303 shall be adhered to,
2.
A lot line adjustment shall be recorded to eliminate the lot
line between the two parce?s containing the theater prior to
the issuance of building permits.
l
AFPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF JULY, 1985.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Dennis L. stout, Chairman...
ATTEST: sF
Jack Lam, Secretary [
I, Jack tam, Secretary of the Planning Coiemission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby rertify,:t hat .the foregoing Resolut -:on was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and- adupi;2d by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Lucamotiga,_at a regular meeting of the Planning Ccmmissiot held
on the 24th day of July, 1963, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERSs
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
t
L�
�.N. ., �aL �• »u. duou« Nom.°.. — .LUG. °d �u1 ni
_ � —yEE U.aON U NL - AAU
N OyAUN NW �.
q .^n 6 r .D Z d T CON C
ou A L DL N A
6A °p° d � °d O =a—i D•d vas CNU 6Y N ,pd.
dANJ TG O A Y "V n d� — U O
� N
d� ,A
c uu� °c � yu
_ Y o g�
Vq d�d.4L Ha'
sw m >i u'u ��,• -s� _
m. +- uAavi'Lm. aL=. �ooah a °u.°+
d
b O H N !1 v ul
t
J
w Z
O O_
N ~
z z
°u
O
2
O
EG^
*c c
Auu
L a'v
o =u L
td
f)
Lv Q.d= LAY! i
Vatic. 4. n�G NN
o.
A� = c'a
ad9
YI.S PN.ir.�
U
I 9
N
L�
�.N. ., �aL �• »u. duou« Nom.°.. — .LUG. °d �u1 ni
_ � —yEE U.aON U NL - AAU
N OyAUN NW �.
q .^n 6 r .D Z d T CON C
ou A L DL N A
6A °p° d � °d O =a—i D•d vas CNU 6Y N ,pd.
dANJ TG O A Y "V n d� — U O
� N
d� ,A
c uu� °c � yu
_ Y o g�
Vq d�d.4L Ha'
sw m >i u'u ��,• -s� _
m. +- uAavi'Lm. aL=. �ooah a °u.°+
d
b O H N !1 v ul
t
J
w Z
O O_
N ~
z z
°u
O
2
O
EG^
*c c
Auu
L a'v
O
td
f)
=
M9a AC.~ifLp
"
17 9
a4
�°> em906Eu
ti
�O
il= •
a
� •
O��. uJiYY9Yn
\\
Y
y
N
Up�oT
9EN2
CM
Y.4 N
anv
d
d= N> d U y O L
p
a
OL a
o a"
ri
a[•
uI ^upm °YO
1�
^
«a
y
r
.v
u.
la e~ 6
A —
oa.
S Y
N U Y• u
�'
J
Tooc -TO
q
n a
Y� q'
�ad,m
NN
FAT O
q
A �q
LNs —O
B.
6 N S N q NL� r
1 ,
N
H
•
C
6
q
L.0
-
d ^yam
O ^. E dE
L ^A W�Q
2 qEi
A ry =� Ya
IR
_� ^\
� Ed
qA pCCU.
O oa.p A9 qN
Y o Y. nc
Y
T C
dd d.CL L 1
L CEV GI L' �'.
N AY
o
L
4-1
d
VON O
Cn
YNy1 L�2.6 Kd
�4°•NA a G
OL
O TTd V^ �dA
�m X.�
3
M. �9 A yL
•�
A
° N
vddu L
° L
e r2nq.T
rT v L A
L
va
1;
YtL 3ai'-
N
L6
vd °;�
^ O
A
E >'
A nN TN dd
C
NLL T.0 n
St.
N L
d d c.
L 2
E> L
L^ f•. N 4N
y� Aa L A ota 2 s.
BE a
'
C � 6g
u C 9 � O° S p
qr � °�
O.O
ACO >. nm
N O 9
dq
o.CLa
C ^ � y NO
E AG
Cy9N
dN
C°S.q
^
Ta
OO ^n
A.Y N L� a >GC
C 9O
G •a
avr T� i:>
T a
T
° d L A = u i'° o.
R v
°Oa°
N C V S V•
Oy
n Z;.5
. AE+
EY«
r•�
L° T d O E O L d C t
L=
~I
OLa T`r LL `O
Y 2 3 N U
rll ^'
N ci ^y
¢
L ^� NI c4
•
I?
U
N
t
2 Ot 6C y� rni a'T ^
A eq .yvey
raU d0bMA
�2 Ln
` a �yCy
� V2...
°^ u a^
°d°w
O� d p l4 0 6 M
NY N
N
r n^ � d L 9 0^ Y
�i ^"O.w
n O u E y .• y N
IcoN.L q o-
Y y A
L T �L
G
ppAS
9-1 L E y C
w- L y= q C y
VC T
d Ona CdO
YNE.W .V
V
ug.; Ad
u
Er9dd
N N
d
P.Y CL a'
C N 9 EjY C
NL 9u Y
Nv
yL�N 6L
�N.J d�
.•••'L G yA
° ay U. �^6
OO V
�YTO OC
A Ly g.
t..W Lym °�
�••'
^•°d>
�_6 C 'O
fU.l^ tipOL�
C
r Nu Ofn6
de O V N C
yM
^�°zc
« L W Er 26
_
=L CvY
A u ul O6 °
L 2
•OC 9S •nOr
yd -
E • u D
L4A�w
q y
CS
-9
W
LSC09�
N
dr
A y
CL�
°i
N
T O
C e
^C
rN� LN
=
Z a yC
N •, � O
d N wadq LO{L
6 C
9YL A
p
Y9 C�n9
O 2 d
9 ar q
Y
G E LC
�
D N
61n ^O.
Vyrl dnC
N^
�2y9N .+
Add 'yU YO
dE O.A
.d
'S N
Na
Q
y CpAG p
dAOy
�yVU US.O pcL L.G.
O y�N.c C EO NSr
• 4
•O a Sd A
«
�^ °U
O y L
y CU
Y
YO NyU
•° N.S. d ^d
° M. /-• L y'I
d 'O c
A Y
L •p
9.m
.d0
Tt"
�� C A O. C
P
� l ° T;^ °- ++
9yrEEC O
K L.
^V N�c O +Tye E LOL
9a
C
an ^L u �C�O
A O
L
yL p ° -I= L 1
V C
�
gN6Ln •+N6
Ley ac u° u4
H.0 N.OA R�Na N.9A
C
^ j T CC 6
•La q-.C4
d N
d pyEp
HyYNCO AwC•q¢A6
D �1�
K]
to d
=�
�q o oNne
N L Csy�
6
cd, c 9ca
m�
oun L�Qa
y C L N N
U A ~ C
E o u
qwd
T d�L6
L L 6Ano
u •O Y n C }
6N °+• O V C
dyu� L ~qE9
u E a u tl Y
4L.�ilA 4Al..m
ya n
O
1
M
s
y
N
Mo c
m
yd' e=
000 ,mct =' > °LO
Oy
4.d�
L �• _
y
n.
doq
L a o
E
aw
W
Ls.-c
�t
oN Yo
n
mwo d Nw
A Lc>'
•�o p
Cu
NgLO
C �L•_
¢ qL,S 2.
Z
°N'mga
O
o .Y<,
Nom. uL
�C
c °^ o.d •Lil �r�.NC
pO
cd�NN
NCU.dC a=
V
Q%.
CqM
^• L
U.-
a! 3L
L u•L
�!
Nyr y>
dy r ^Ya
Sai.NU
.dti 6Na O'•'�NO ya•�
Y C
du O^ L
TMON r9
a
bq
•O
pl
u. n A
N.dxF L
nN4 q G�
4 �
!!1.' C
T
L L
N
CuY
S-
•dU0O
T^ C 2„
U
Yta.G
c N
N�
`2; Ea
•.
N6d G. to
y
uUL y
oti�
y
U
^!L
C
L!
-4-2yN
y
C p
! U U r p 6 p N
0 9 2
dUL
rn L •a ~
LV NCB ^E
FEE NU
L
U
Eyyd
DI KI
I6
a y
t..i. C A
L
uou
O
y 0
qIL
'. E
N
C
o.
rnq
n E O
X> d O r
o.
U
oN
EN
E EE
C
Ldq U
nL 6
C N
�L °da L•_ .T
U u
6vOi
G LLN.YU CN
y�>
nA yp
ro.
u
V
�TyyMy
ayd
O t
E E m
u d u d n
.-...a .•�-
OLU
N> >.C.
c
.� -!•Oyu
� o d -
� NpN
6 6N
3NGl FNL
6Ny. i TN•^il C.O
¢CCOG. 6u.
LOA6N
nl
ql
X1
O
K]
to d
=�
�q o oNne
N L Csy�
6
cd, c 9ca
m�
oun L�Qa
y C L N N
U A ~ C
E o u
qwd
T d�L6
L L 6Ano
u •O Y n C }
6N °+• O V C
dyu� L ~qE9
u E a u tl Y
4L.�ilA 4Al..m
ya n
O
1
M
s
y
o
•� y
n,
Ao�
6N'n
caepli
Oy
as
n.
doq
E
�UpY
Ur.
a�"
yay
EY
� D9
y�d>
.DC
Cu
NgLO
C �L•_
¢ qL,S 2.
r
a• O!V
NQ
60
CALO.G
NCU.dC a=
uc _
YY 4 y O
pdC
U O
�y
y
w. ya'
u
L %NOn 6d!
dd
w
No cw
jt
y�OS
L
yn
ny'6�
yQ ^pd9
cc
ti
T^ C 2„
U
Yta.G
c N
N�
`2; Ea
•.
N6d G. to
y
uUL y
oti�
y
U
^!L
q ou rn
ACd
L
Y
4 n
u UZ
uu94f
>
u
•O Dydjp
LV NCB ^E
FEE NU
L
!a
= 0 o
c
N d
n L a! •°
dy°
a y
t..i. C A
L
uou
O
y 0
qIL
'. E
U O
U
N E j y
N"r.
N C O
y^ •O P N C: E
.+coc pe
n E O
X> d O r
o.
L U
> C
'dV p n
i Y U `•°' L L
4E
G 6
6N6ro
Wd nom. Y1y Y.
Cuero
de 2
QLr
Et T�
Q3
n
adi l^
�y
d
L u
d
CNNd
c
7[99
..•03
cu
b AL Ur 'S
C VY yY
bM.�
co�
oo�z
d.L
<
C;
Z
-X-
4
01b1
E<-
°Ed.Vw
u
{..l
N.T a
E°
L'A
y a
m
-o. lw�LL
QY
y
U�°
,A how..
zivNEE+
U A�
N
U A.
NS. w
Y�9..c.
AAw°r>
'•9c
•�
V I T L
U E 6
O y Z c Ac a
&Z .
O
O`r
N
tdCUd
V
LOy9A
�+r ClL
6�Cy1L du1
rCT
Y�
u .^�m
r d
UOq
rRd
yL
I"
NEyLN
...O
.�Ua
A A
r
L�
A 9
C
A'
NEiE
L°
Ed
n
°Iu
nua¢
A` Ly
Lyq
gV A
>
NTO
>Lmo
to
N+dr
y
�a
FniP
mVm
d
IL-66M
r c
3L�+. VA1D
rNA
N�Ly
a
En
c a
T
N.
aL
L
_dn
N i •
Cuero
7e.°
°CA
o°cuv mq
Nt°�
m rE
C d
pq.�Cd
VC C id
O L O a o
A
� Ad
U rC
6ACd
w�
-b`
nE0
d
CNNd
cq -o wb
mad
AY r q V N
b
r6
b AL Ur 'S
C VY yY
Luc
A O d
-2 nx
A .«.
r
6 n
tG1Ld
y L
�dgdd
�.
G C d d c L E m
q`w"'U C �
d�
=$ar
T
m
-o. lw�LL
QY
C.r•.r ^d y
gEam �
A
zV
O O 6
U A�
aT NdE
Ou c'
pct= M
NS. w
Y�9..c.
AAw°r>
'•9c
d0.6 dE
i^ �
p
d°
9 T q
�dY
O
O`r
N
c
E
d
AdU O.
d'a d
1-UWL
LOy9A
�+r ClL
6�Cy1L du1
r C r
"z 67 O U C
SY -O
N
LO
O WE
S
NI �. N
W •VI
w
Y.
La
qew°
p�
2q
06
O LU
U ^V
Ody
dw
t0
r
.Ly
� Ad
U rC
6ACd
p
Vpy
b
O C
b
r6
b AL Ur 'S
C VY yY
NyL
UV
Awd..N
A .«.
bN
Ln
r_ro.
qC
L CC CN d.
�-� N
A
a i
q t
= p
b
p
d°
9 T q
q
TO i
t
A 9
C
r nu
bN
ni��
A
E.M A
gV A
O
yNO i
A c.d
ep
y
�a
EL
aq .9'c Nd Lc
yT
a
a
N�
do
Ar
n0
N�Ly
a
En
c a
T
N.
aL
L
_dn
N i •
D-
y Cam. cmw L
x A L
O�
q
n,
q p
c
w E
aN
d Ld<
d N
1 4 2
Q
N 2 9 A
n
Yt pC
E O g 9
Td N2m
b N+•
O N UT b a
'. a.^-. �bL•i
NO
O
C
S n w
E
N d
6
E
A N=.o
Cy d
A O
u
e.w�n� u
�
Cq°I
O
Te db
a.� a.oa A.b TO
.. ♦'2? W
aU
W.�..q.
9 cC L
9
VE <R
�� Vg4. cpEL,
rx r
^dub
NN w
rL
SA
~ ^
JLE'^ Q
A
C6m
pUx
ELn
E4. WE2 6G.Yd
H
N
�
d
4
N
too
«
«U
'go
4
�NOO� E
L dLL
«
C
t] v
1-4.0
CNN
Jt
4J
««
m
od
n
i6w"
AO�
da LLn.e
�^ C
E N�
y°�
G
'OL
L• Y
A
dVi
C Ca O
«a�
C ^«
«...
o N E c
di
C b E>
°G�
NQOY q9d
9 9
A vq'
to
EL « °G
=�
uo
ME
�O.OI«°^ 60 ��
cLJ
N.ppL
OY
Cp
^Q°
_—
N
N ^,o..YCp,
°
t
C
E p
N••
Y°
GOL
^^ EE c
LL[u�V <03,38,6t
>
A ?�? N
°3
N o
G
.�.r D
^O
Yp«
m
O O
MCE6
p
GVM
'
N^
a d•
-q :;
b QY.
5 c
o� C
L c
pQ
V
a Cd
«ate
L O«
V
N
dC
w d
Cq.c�.Y
uCLQ eEi
PL @@
C da°..0
�E
2VC
«.<GuG
W6
0v
V. uT°.. 3pnj^
L O
C
OIN
4
O I L
CU1m
6
a�CC
6 N a
2 T2o +.
Cn
5 E d
U
° «.
oe t
O q >>
mJa
F C C C q
b�
yC
CNN
d
q9
U
' °yl. °q
L °ONY:
C ^
•
YdN
O OV
N L
«M
qw
o
°
vc
Ja c
ZE
r
T'
Qad9
w u,rd
« 0':2 e
^ 06
ioE d
IZ
'
j
d
a
C 00
!l
uO
G
U YQ
UM
^ N
LO4
Y
y
LVbN
Cade
C
+c'O
N. ac
E`
o. °'°
''�
°ua
E
?ui Ya
'p 1A rN.
na
6Oiv0
1. o >. c
OOa Er'L
E
WNQ
and
t] n
tU'tpl U. �sy
o u�
^
tD�62
vN
6p
ey. 40
°I°d YY
Kqj l=O @
q
C
V
r
N
•�
B
RE
«. a
� Y V
Oau d !.
b
.+
W
2
0
V)
1OU
L'EE
v
N O
:5
V
�^
v
a
90��«
N.
�
L
d
yuU
nr'
^�
b b G
n ^ G
a aT.
Y
L Y
4
d T
y a
Y q t
U t
c= Y
d ^ a
W
N
d. q u
wv'
c
L
^ d a m
c
sc—
~co
arm �Gni =,� °.
d N
C.
Q
AwT+N'1
> G'^
` N V
L
N V L •`
C.f L
du
y_L^ NV
6
a^ 6
.2
G° O
N
6 V Y
C V
o,a°i d
w
'^
n
^r
wJe
^
yu M
Yd
lN.
GC d
N
'C Ly
Cp
CL
qpW
ol
(f'LN Vd G
E'pL2
w°
R.
G
LqL�
NATO
�S Gq
�N
vE-N
`
Odt^
M9y NC
UUm Y
C� °1YY duc
N.- adi��W 2w L a
> N -x y r
u nuc�i
VfL er
6� w
t°
YIOr'�.
.�
N'O
r
nY. 6 V
K,�
�
6 WM Lti
v c e
SQ U9 < U°.
'
� \I �
T�
1 {{
rI \I
4t
� 1
ti A b
\I `•�
i
MawfrC
� Y V
•�
W
2
0
v
a a > n
Qd c
�^
v
a
v
V�
b b G
L
N 52
40
W
N
�� uv o EEw
L.°r 9r Q c3lw dv
a a cq.,
o°'C CC S �Nra N
Nio-\
^ d a m
c
arm �Gni =,� °.
d N
Yc N NE .
v c ♦ "' N
� C
9r NECEE NO YMYS i ♦+v
VL W Z SogANG
n A 4 L 6L L°fr
R.
NOR&E-114161
O�
a
t
u
0
r
oL
OI Y
c
a
qL
Q
C
r
n J
U <
A
U
t
=ate
tf c y
N aq«
w �
Y�
E �aQ
D rn
n
u�
qua
6�
CMG
B €uN
sa
o niw
~ u
O ��p
N iO bnc
G o^ W
� Lt�
V fi nN{�
0
El
3
cis
C a
W
N
O�
a
t
u
0
r
oL
OI Y
c
a
qL
Q
C
r
n J
U <
A
U
t
=ate
tf c y
N aq«
w �
Y�
E �aQ
D rn
n
u�
qua
6�
CMG
B €uN
sa
o niw
~ u
O ��p
N iO bnc
G o^ W
� Lt�
V fi nN{�
0
El
u
4
O
Z
41
t)
0
.N N
2 A
O
Y
O
O
C
L
N
••
^
O
`
u �
v
or
o c I
a
y'z
L
®a
c�
a i
2
i
r
N2
c
o
9
d
m
G p
AAc
r u
V 2
b•
4G %, i �
N, E E
rt
w �
NN
Oa
A�
° •1G�
✓
u
Q
U
dL6.
D L
T.O C
C
0 U
O
6nj
O
ip;
y
w
!
u°
PC
a_=+aq
LL�
Ea
pL.
id
O
d
aoNg
a
S�
•�: O
N A
�O L Y`
LL °a
C u U
U N
O1
T 6
n
Y
H. `
Y �S �.
6 •Z
N
y 2
Y
A
n
Y. y
pOv
'O N.
-.9Y
N
N
9N iJY
iT. U
aY
NOS
Q
.°d G C 1
O
I
«
L Cd
yu
�•Y
4'c'
N
L 1�
Y
OI
y•
.Q
T.y9
rA
nv
Cn
°Tq
W =
Q
o
AY
D
It
of
••
ay
A
Y.C�
Y S�
a
Y OY 7a
aT+� Ou D Y i
q M
u
A`
du
y
yy
T N�
•A• >°
'•^ i� >AA
`emu
€
c `Y
dM�
Y
*D•O�°Y
_•>-
Q�
» OD O��l
4n.Y.
.p'`.•:N
0
\ry1t
0
I I
.N N
2 A
O
Y
O
O
C
L
N
••
^
O
`
u �
v
Yty
�a
y'z
L
a i
2
i
r
N2
c
o
9
d
m
G p
AAc
.N N
2 A
O
� W G
v
•O � 8
g=
Pd�
V L N
M N N° •
A C N
c ^
d Y
oq y
o �
ov c°
a
ji
r�
r y
� L
Y
a �
V
y. u
o h
6 C
M
L
o �
a
c
N Y LL
d �C L �
A 4 L°t 2
O Y
e L i
O�W N
�y
a� �w
Z Y 6v
H
t
t�
v
d
dG
EE`e°iL
•.O
A� •
d
NN
��
Y SY OT
a A
U old
^
U
dL6.
D L
T.O C
C
0 U
O
6nj
O
ip;
y
w
!
u°
PC
a_=+aq
LL�
Ea
pL.
id
O
d
aoNg
a
-
O
D
Y
V
V
C /``•
n °
p :OAT
k;;
rA
nv
Cn
°Tq
W =
Q
o
AY
D
It
Hwy
Y.C�
w{
Q N
b
A 0 D•
-(:�t1
� W G
v
•O � 8
g=
Pd�
V L N
M N N° •
A C N
c ^
d Y
oq y
o �
ov c°
a
ji
r�
r y
� L
Y
a �
V
y. u
o h
6 C
M
L
o �
a
c
N Y LL
d �C L �
A 4 L°t 2
O Y
e L i
O�W N
�y
a� �w
Z Y 6v
H
t
t�
0
11
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF F;FPURT
DATE: July 24,- -1985 %
TO: Chairmat and Members of the Planning Commission
z
FROM: Jack iv, Dirpetor of Community Development
,A�V;
BY, Rubin Yu, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: PROPERTY ACQUISITION FOR A SECOMD JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL SITE
IN ALTA LOMA SCHOOL DISTRICT.
;3r
I. ABSTRACT: This report provides genet;�l information about the
proposed junior high school site and identifies the major concerns
and potential problems with the site. The Commission will be
asked to make recommendations to the Alta Loma School District.
I. RACKGROUND: Recently, the Alta Loma School District has informed
the City of its plans to acquire the Opici Winery property as a
site for their second junior high school. State law (Education
Code S---tion 39004) requires school districts to notify the City's
�Planning Commission before acquiring property for a new school
site. The City does not have jurisdiction over approval or denial
of the site selection. However, the City Planning Commission is
authorized to submit recommendations tF, the school district for
their cons`Jeration. Such recommendations must be made within
�zhirty (30) days. Following receipt of the City's recommendation,
the final decision on the acquisition is made by the governing
board of the School District.
III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The subject site consists of approximately 17.2 acres located at
the northeast corner of Highland Avenue and Hermosa Avenue. (The
site does not incit!de the existing single- family residential
property to the northwest•of the site, Exhibit "A").
The property is general planned and zoned for low density
residential use (2 -4 du /ac). Public schools are permitted uses in
residential. districts. Proposed school site designations on the
General Plan are not considered to be site specific. Rather, they
are "floating ", and ident' the general vicinity based , on
projected need and service area. The final site decision is mode
by the school district based on land availability in th,i area. The
proposed school site is not specifically designated by _he General
Plan, however, it is located in the same general service area as
the one designated on Wilson, east of Hermosa. (Please see the
attached General Plan Map, Exhibit "B ").
ITEM P
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Junior High School Site
July 24, 1985
Page #2
With the exception of the soutif'side, the surrounding property of
the _proposed school site is general planned a►►d deve;oped with
single - family resir,ential. The property immediately to the south
of the site is planned for the Foothill Freeway right -of -way;
presently, it is vacant.
IV. ISSUES /ANALYSIS: The subject site appears to be adequate in size
for a junior high schnoi. Staff,' however, is concerned with the
location. The proposed school site is adjacent to the proposed
Foothill Freeway (Route 30). The southern portion of the sjjte
lies within the designated right -of -way o, the proposed freeway
and Highland Avenue realignment. (Please seP Exhibit "A ".) This
would reduce the size of the site and affect the design of the
school. The site design must take the proposed Highland
realignment into consideration to facilitate the reconstruction of
Highland, and to prq -4A-a appropriate access and setbacks.
In addition, the site may be adversely affectec by freeway noise,
traffic, emissions, and the like. The degree of these impacts
depends on the design of the freeway. At this tune, information
concerning the ultimate elevation and design of the roedway is not
available.
V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Commission review the
proposal an , irect staff to forward appropriate comments to the
Alta Loma School District. Should the district proceed with the
acquisition, the City should request th::u:
1. The issue of Highland Avenue realignment be addressed
prior to the acquisition; and
2. The City be given an opportunity tr ee"ew and coma. t
on the desi ^;n of the school and ofi -site improvements,
to assure compatibility with surrounding developi.ient and
improvement standards.
Respectfully submitted,
V I�'
Jack Lea
1` Director of Communi v Services
JL:RY :cv
G
{
0 1�
1,
,s
9
ALI -
I
lyl CA
0
0 .0
o 0 0,
(A m
4.0
m
z.
E;m
zw
m
X
X
Mow
so~
Z
0
0
0 0
a C:
G) >
AVE. g
r
—7
m
X
l
Zr
ril
14" HOUSING
CO)
0
-nHERMOSA
AVE.
C
m
x
Leta- cr)
Till
ii
n
I
lyl CA
0
0 .0
o 0 0,
(A m
4.0
m
z.
E;m
zw
m
X
X
Mow
so~
Z
0
0
0 0
a C:
G) >
AVE. g
So
Zr
ril
0
C
A
n
I
lyl CA
0
0 .0
o 0 0,
(A m
4.0
m
z.
E;m
zw
m
X
X
Mow
so~
Z
0
0
0 0
a C:
G) >
AVE. g
EXHIBIT "B"
i
.. t
e 1 Chaffy
' Ca(lege _
• ..�:X
r
+ _
t . •� + ....... _
XV. • ...... I
Wt
.r..
• �t�•.
,r „7
a• �
•••
T.r I
J
Y
71
71
y
i
s
la
J
N ii IN t
RESIDENTIAL
VERY LOW <2 ®U's /AC
C LOW 2 -4 Dig's /AC
LOW- MEDIUM 4 -8 DU "s /AC
MEDIUM 414 Ws,AC
'MEDIUM -HIGH 14 -2. DU's /AC -
- HIGH 24 -30 DU's /AC
P —' O MASTER PLAN REQUIRED
EXHIBIT "B"
i
.. t
e 1 Chaffy
' Ca(lege _
• ..�:X
r
+ _
t . •� + ....... _
XV. • ...... I
Wt
.r..
• �t�•.
,r „7
a• �
•••
T.r I
J
Y
71
71
y
i
s
la
J
N ii IN t
RESIDENTIAL
VERY LOW <2 ®U's /AC
C LOW 2 -4 Dig's /AC
LOW- MEDIUM 4 -8 DU "s /AC
MEDIUM 414 Ws,AC
'MEDIUM -HIGH 14 -2. DU's /AC -
- HIGH 24 -30 DU's /AC
P —' O MASTER PLAN REQUIRED