HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985/08/05 - Agenda Packetr 0701-02 o 875-85 P.C. Agenda Parke o
ill ONE, Ill
__
n
c
N
C7'
0
31
Ln
O
R
U
N
3
O
.D
I
R
Mm
o
n
c
N
C7'
0
31
Ln
O
R
U
N
3
O
.D
I
Monday
QTY OF
RANCHO ct CA1,vza_ GA
PLANNING CCONMISSION
AGE, NDA
August 5, 1985 -6:00 P.M. (Dinner at 5:30 p.m.;
Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center - Room 4
9791 Arrow Highway
Rancho Cucamonga, California
PLANNING COR4ISSION WORKSHOP
DEVELOPMENT. REVIEW 85 -31 GATEWAY (MASTER PLAN
--11n. — I -- —. i RGY IGW ou -ct MCAT CK /Kl11RCK
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY The development of a Master 'Plan for a acre
office /business par and the first phase consisting of 3 office buildings
totaling 88,900 square feet on 6.5 acres of land in the Industrial Park
District (Subarea 6) and the Raven Avenue Overlay Di.�trict, located at the
northeast corner of 4th Street and Haven Avenue - APN 210- 081 -1, 2, 3, 16.
I.
Introductory
Comments
S:wO
- 6:05
II.
Presentation
by Reiter /Rinker Dev. Co.
6 :05
- 6:20
III.
Staff. Report
by Nancy Fong, Assistant Planner
6 :20
- 6 :35
III.
Discussion of Related Issues /Concerns
6:35
- 7:00
BREAK 7 :00 -'7.10
FOOTOILL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY: INTERIM POLICIES - Commission review of
interim policies to be applied to development projects along Foothill
Boulevard prior to adoption of the Foothill Boulevard Plan.
I. Staff Report 7 :10 7:30
II. Discussion of Goal /Interim Policies 7:30 - 8:00
ADJOURNMENT: The Planning Commission will adjourn to the August 14, 1985
regu ar meeting.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: "•igust 5, 1965
TO: iirman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner
3Y: Curt Johnston, Associate P'ianner
SUBJECT: FOOTHILL BOULEVARo CORRIDOR STUDY: INTERIM POLICIES -
Commission review of interim policies to be applied ':o
development projects olong Foothill Boulevard prior to
adoption of Foothill Boulevard Plan.
I. BACKGROUND: This report is , provided as a follow -up from the
previous meeting at which Commission reviewed the boundaries of the
study area, major issues, and goals. For discussion purposes, a
rough draft of the goal statement and interim policies is
provided. Since this is just a workshop, no formal tion is
warranted, but in- depth discussion is critical. To ..uide the
decision making process, the policies must be written in a manner
allowing clear interpretation of the indent. This is particularly
true, given the twelve to eighteen month time frame of the Foothill
Study and the number- of applications which are pending and /or
likely to be submitted.
II. GOALS STATEMENT: At the previous meeting four goals were presented
relative to land use, urban design, traffic and circulation, and
economic viability. At this time, an overall and general goal
statement it provided for discussion purposes as a preluOe to the
interim policies. Since it serves as a guide for development of
the interim policies, Commission consensus will be required. In
spite of the complexity of issues, it should be kept as simple and
as tangible as possible. .
III. INTERIM POLICIES: The first draft the the interim policies has
been broken down into five categories: General Requirements, land
Use Amendments, Master Plan Development, New Development, and Non
Conforming Lots /Structures. The following U an outline of each
section.
A. General Requirement: The policies begin with the General
Requirements which cover three topics; preliminary reviews,
time limits, and compatibility. The preliminary review
requirement was requested by the Plannning Commission at i;he
last meeting and covers all new projects. The policy could be
limited in scope if desirable for only certa;r, projects, like
multi- family residential and mini - warehouses. Policy A.2
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Foothill Blvd. Corridor Study: Interim policies
August 5, 1985
Page 2
establishes a one-year initial ap;�roval limit to allow re-
assessment of projects soon after completion of the Foothi1,11
Study. Ertensi ns up to the normal 4 -year total could still be
granted. Regarding compatibility, Policy A.1 reinforces land
use and design solutions currently in practice. This polic. is
under the General Requirements section since it applies across
the board to land use, master planning, and new development.
B. Land Use Amendments: As - written, Policy B.1 "discourages"
Genera an Land Use Amendments. Two G.P.A.s, however, have
been submitted and will be reviewed on September 25, 1985, so
findings are provided if the Commission is in favor of a
particular project. Two other options would be to not allow
submittal of any ameadment;,(i.2. moratorium), or rely on the
current procedure, in wh *cn case the Commission most likely
will review a greater number of application luring preparation
of the study. Regarding Development District Amendments,
Policy B.2 allows adjustuents of boundaries within the
guidelines of the General Pl',n Land Use Map, This provision is
intended to be a useful tool during the Master Plan process 11y
allowing flexibility. Another area not covered, but which the
Commission may wish to review is restrictions on certain laf:d
uses in the General Commerical and Office Districts. The u! r,,
matrix for the Development Code is attached for your revier.
The intent would be to disc.::;rage low intensity uses, such as
mini- warehouses, centractors yards, second hand stores, etc.
C. Master Plan Development: The toaster Plan requirements
containe in the interim policies are similar to those approved
for Haven Avenue. The emphasis is on problem solving,
particularly in regard to -strip commercial which is typiiried
by fragmented develoment on a lot by lot basis, inconsistent in
design and improvements, and parking along the street scape.
In addition, master planning is intended to increase the
efficiency of site planning with combined circulation and
access.
D. New Development: Architectural and site planning is discussed
in the section concerning new development. Four Jasic design
philosophies are highlighted including; winery- theme
architecture, pedestrian orientation, combined access, and
public transit. Specifying the architectural flavor is
intended to prohibit project,, clearly inconsistent with the
community identity. However, 011, final Foothill Corridor Study
will be more specific in terms of design detail and dealing
with special areas such as Etiwanda or the vicinity of the.
Sycamore Inn.
f
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
I Foothill Blvd. Corridor 'Study: Interim Policies
August 5, 1985
Page 3
E. Nun- Conforming Lots /Structures: At the previous meeting, the
Planning Commission stressed urban design as a major issue.
Considering ,,this, the adopted Foothill Plan must provide a
strategy to deal with existing rion- conforming Sots and
structures. At this point, it is difficult to establish
meaningful criteria. However, three e
E interim. policies ar..
provided which would restrict new development on non- conforming
lots unless constructed as part of an overall Master Plan
consistent with the Development Code. In practice, this would
be difficult to accomplish prior to completion of the Foothill
Plan. Many of the small lots along Foothill Blvd.; are Lnly
7500 square feet (50' x. 150' ), whereas commercial and office
property must be a minimum of 40,000 square feet (175' x 200"
minimum dimensions). This would necessitate that lots be
combined for planning purposes to allow joint parking, access,
etc.
In addition, the Development Code allows ree, ced building and
landscape setbacks on non - conforming lots which Policy E.2
would override. Regarding re- design of existing buildings,
Policy E.3 requires landscaping along the ,street frontage..
Since major expenditures to a building could substantialv
extend its existence, the intent of the policy is to provide
some consistency with current standards. In addition to
landscaping, full street improvements including sidewalks and a
lien for the median island could be added; however, the cost of
these improvements could stifle any improvement efforts.
IV. RECOMMENDATION: As mentioned, the attached policies are in rough
draft and intended for workshop discussion purposes. With input
from the Coomiss' the policies will be re- worked and other
topics covered ecessary. Further discussion and /or formal
action cou occ r the August 14th or August 28th meetings.
Respectfully ubm tef
y�
Otto Kroutil /
Senior Planner +/
OK:CJ.ko ,
UITjY "�CjO�F
PLANNING DIVISICXN
N URTH
iTFm: dd.A. S'il'✓
TITLE
EXHIBIT -- SCALE- `®" v
V7
l 1,D I
NORTH
CITY OF ITElM: !Y
RANCHO CLTCAI OiN.GA TITLE:
PLANNING DIVISION E,YI�IGiT ,. SCALE: • ®.
Section 17.10.030 '
. I
C. General Commercial District (GC): This district is intended for general
. )mmercial activities and services of =a more intensive nature. These uses would
be located primarily along major transportation routes and would include major
shopping facilities, major service - ,oriented uses, major financial and corporate
headquarters which are designed to serve the City or the region as a whole.
Section 17.10.030 'Use Regulations ,
Uses listed in Table 17.10.030 shall be allowable in one or more of the commercial
districts as indicated in the columns beneath each commercial district. Where indicated
with the letter "P", the use shall be a permitted use in that district. Where indicated
with the, letter "C", the use shall be a conditional use subject to the Conditional Use
Penrit process. In the event there is difficulty in categorizing a given use in one of the
districts, the procedure outlined in Section 17.02.040 shall be followed.
TABLE 17.10.030 USE 'REGULATIONS FOR CO14 MERCiA1.1OFFICS D1STMCT5,
USE OP NC GC
A. Offices and Related Uses
1. Administrative and executive offices. P P P
i
2. Artist and photographic studios, not P P P
including the sale of equipm ^•at or,
supplies.
3. Clerical and professional offices. P P P �
4. Financial services and institutions. P P P
5. Medical, dental and related health P P P
services (non - animal related) including
laboratories and clinics; only the sale of
articles clearly incidental to the services
provided ::hall be permitted.
6. Prescription pharmacies, (also when P P P
located within a building containirg the
offices of 5 or more medical practitioners)
7. Public buildings (library, city and county P P P
buildings, special districts and post
office).
8. Public utility service offic::z: P P P
9. Public safety facility (police, fire, C C C
ambulance and paramedics).
Section 17.10.030
1
USE
SAP
NC
GC
�sC
(f) Service or rsoline dispensing-
C
P
stations ( including minor repair
such as tune -ups, brakes, batteries,
tires, mufflers)
(g) Parts and supplies
-
P
P
10.
Bakeries (retail only).
-
P
P,
11;
Barber and beauty shops.
P
P
P
12.
Bicycle shops.
-
P
P
P
P
P
13.
Blueprint and photocopy --rvices
14.
Boat and camper sales and services.
-
-
C
15.
Book, gift and stationary stores (other
C
P
P
than adult related material).
16.
Candy storos and confectionaries.
-
P
P
17.
Catering establishments.
-
-
P
l
18.
Cleaniig and pressing establishments.
C
P
P
19.
Carpenter shop or cabinet shop.
-
-
P
20.
Cocktail lounge (bar, lounge, tavern)
including related entertunment.
(a) Operated independe-.t • of a
C
-
C
restaurant
(b) Accessory to a restaurant
C
C
C
21.
Commercial recreation facilities.
(a) Indoor uses such as bowling,
C
C
P
theaters, billards,
(b) Outdoor uses such as golf, tennis,
C
C
C
basketball, baseball, trampolines,
etc:
22.
Contractor yards (screening of outdoor
-
-
C
storage required).
23.
Dairy product stores.
-
P
P
Section 17.11,030
G0
USE
GI?
NC:
24.
bepartment stores.
-
-
P
25.E
Drive -in businesses, including theaters.
-
C
C
(other than fast food restaurants)
25.
Drug s`cres and pharmacies.
-
P
P
27.
Equipment rental yards.
29.
Fast -food restaurants.
C
C
P
29.
Fee /Tack stores
-
C
P
30.
Florist shops.
P
P
P
31.
Food stores and supermarkets.
-
P
P
32.
Fur- ,,ure stores; repair and upholstery.
-
P
P
33.
General retail stores.
-
P
P
34.
Hardware stores..
-
P
P
35.
Home improvement centers.
(a) Material stored and sold within
-
P
P
enclosed buildings
(b) Outdoor stora ,s of material such as
-
-
C
iumb.r & building materials
36.
Hotels and Motels.
C
-
P
37.
ice Machines (outdocr)�
-
C
C
38.
Janitorai sarvices and supplies.
C
P
P
39.
Jewelry stores.
-
P
P
40.
Laundry- self - service.
-
P'
P
41.
Liquor stores.
-
P
P
42.
Kiosks for key shops, filin drops, etc. in
-
C
C
parking lots.
43.
Locksmith shop.
-
P
P
-y,
44.
Mini- storage for public use (no outdoor
storage).
-
C
y
Section 17.''0.030
i
USE
OP
NC
GC
45.
Mortuaries and cemeteries.
C
C
G
46..
Motorcycle sales and service.
-
-
C
'
47.
Newspaper and magazine stores, printing
-
C
P
and publishing.
48.
Nurseries and garden, supply stores;
-
P
P
provided, in the NC district, all
equipment, supplies and material are f;ept
within an enclosed area.
49.
Office and business machine stores.
C
P
P
50.
Parking facilities (commercial) where fees
C
-
V
are charged.
51.
Political or philanthropic headquarters.
C
C
P
52.
Pet shop.
-
P
53.
Plumbing shop and supplies,,
-
P
54.
Photocopy
P
P
P
55.
Printing shops.
-
-
P
56.
Restaurants (other than fast food).
(a) With entertainment and/or seeving
C
C
P
of alcoholic beverages
(b) Incidental nerving of beer and wine
P
P
P
l:.
but without a cocktail lounge, bar,
r"
entertainment or dancing
57.
Recreational Vehicle Storage Yard.
C
C
C
sr.
58.
Shoe stores, sales and repair.
-
P
P
59.
Second -hand stores and pawn shops.
-
-
P
l
t
60.
Shopping Center subject to provisions in
-
C
C
ti
Section 17.10:030 -F.5.
61.
Spiritualist readings or astrology
forecasting.
62.
Sporting goods stores.
-
P
p
63.
Stamp and coin shops.
-
P
P
it
jI
ed
Section 17.10.030
GC
OP
kc
64.
Swimming pool supplies.
P
'IP
65.
Tailor.
P
P
66,
Taiddermists.
P
67.
T ievisW-, radio sales and service.
P
P
a?.
Tire sales and service.
C
69.
Toy stores.
P
P
70.
Travel agencies.
P
P
P
71.
Transportation facilities (train and bus,
G
C
C
ta-m! depots).
72.
Truck and trailer rental, sale, and service.
C
73.
Variety stores.
P
P
74.
Vehicular storage yard and towing service.
C
C. Public and semi-public uses
1.
Day, Cate Facilities
C
C
C
2.
Convalescent facilities and hospitals.
C
C
3,
Private and public clubs and lodges,
C
C
C
Including YMCA, '(PICA and similar youth
group uses.
4.
Educational instituions, parochial, private
C
G
C
(including colleges and universities).
&
Libraries & museums, public or private.
C
C
C
6.
Parks and recreation facilities, public or
C
C
C
private.
7.
Public utility Installations.
C
C
C
8.
Vocational or business trade schools.
C
C
C
9.
Churches, convents, monasteries and o,'her
C
C
C.
religious institutions.
/0
ed
ROUGH DRAFT
FOOTHiU CORRIDOR INTERIM POLICIES
INTRODUCTION
The following Goal Statement and Interim Policies are provided to guide the
decision mak'.ng process during preparation of the Foothill Boulevard Corridor
Study. The policies address basic land use and urban design issues unique to
the Foothill Corridor, and are intender to be applied in conjunction with the
Development Code.
The boundaries of the Study Area irclude commercial, office, and residential
properties along Foothill Boulevard, �'anging,from the west city limit at Grove
Avenue to Deer Creek Channel, and from tb Devore Freeway to the east city
1 =,nit at East Avenue.
GOAL STATEMENT
Goals define community aspirations and intentions. The following Goal fol.
Foothill Boulevard attempts to boil down a complex set of issues dealing with
land use, urban design, traffic and circulation, and economic viability into a
comprehensive, understandable and achievable statement:
Establish a high quality, unifying, and attractive design image
reflective of community heritage, and provide a viable setting
for a balanced mixture of residential and commercial activities
with safe and efficient traffio circulation and access.
Based on this goal, the following Interim Policies are provided to address
development related issues during preparation of the Foothill 'Corridor Study..
i
■
ROU,3H DRAFT
INTERIM POLICIES
A. General Requirements.
Preliminary Review A.1 Prior to prmissing development /design
' 4 review applications within the study
. ,•�s ,�(% "evV? area the Planning Commission shall
el . conduct a preliminary review to
, ,j determine compliance with the Interim
y i Goal and Policies contained herein. The
intent is to provide direction to the
iO 1 applicant and staff early in the review
1" process and avoid undue time delays or
expenditures.
Time Limits L--j
6►td
1 e
A.2
Time 'limits for approval of development
proposals shall expire one (1) year
from the date of approval. Extensions
up to a total of four (A) years may be
gr .nted only upon determination that
the subject application and conditions
` of approval are in substantial
compliance with current design
standards for the study area.
1;k-
Compatibility:
k.3 All land use and development proposals
shall consider the impact on adjoining
properties, particularly residential
uses, and mitigate potential conflicts
to the extent .practical. Mi't'igation
i •'�
measures may typically include, but are
not limited to, transition of building
height, architectural form, density,
landscape buffers, sound attenuation,
visual barrier and /or grading
conditions to disrupt lir,2 -of -sight
concerns, and alternative circulat;on
and access.
B. Land Use Amendments:
The intent of the following
policies is to provide a viable setting for a
balanced mixture of residential and commercial activities of communit2 wide
significance compatible with
surrounding land uses.
General Plan
B.i Applications for General Plan, Land Use
f
Amendments are discouraged. Prior to
approval of any such amendment,
V—
hiwever, the Planning Commission
6;0
shall
make the following findings: -.
r
a. The proposed amendment: is
consistent with the intent end'
purpose of the interim policies for
the Foothill Boulevard corridor.
b. The proposer; land use is compatible
with surrounding existing or
planned development.
c. The propos €d land use will not
create significant . traffic or
circ,ilatior impacts.
d. The proposed land use will not be
detrimental to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
I
I
Adjustments to Development District
boundaries may be consider -d w ,)ere
n- cess& -I to achieve more logical and
efficiefa land use and site planning
patterns, if consistent with thr,
General Plan Land Use Element.
I
• r
C. Master Planned Development:
The purpose of this serti'on is to provide for integrated development at the
earliest possible time in the
review, p;,oc:ess. Master planning of defined
areas will avoid develogme.;it
of single parcels of land in a manner which
:vents or prer?udes fu %. — ievelopment
of adjacent parcels in the 'best way
feasible:, Tne specific 'n`ant
is to recognize and solve problem before they
occur and take advantage'ef opportunities while: they exist.
Master Planning
CA A conceptual Master Plan shall be
��►
for Planning Commission
required review
r'-
(L�'�
in conjunction with development
proposals wherever necessar y to assure
,1
�a
integrated development, enhance
• r`
(�
harmeniaus and orderly development,
mitigate sith constraints on adjoining
property aad maximite land potential.
The area or Master Plans shall not be
1
confined by individual lot lines, but
determined by logical planning
boundaries and site conditions as
required by the City Planner.
C.2 At a minimL1, Master Plans shall
indicate conceptual building locations
and orientation, overall circulation,
y
Y`
'
points of ingress and egress, parking
-
M,
1
lot layouts, landscaped areas and
pedestrian nodes, circulation. In
addition, the City Planner may require
other information as deemed necessary
to assure consistency with the intent
of these policies.
C.3 Through the masU: plan process, land
use and site planning ' shall be
i
coord Gated to enhance opportunities
c: „, quality development consistent with
the standards for Foothill Boulpvord,
de- emphasize "strip - commercial” by
creating organized groups of structures
and uses, and provide for efficient
utilization of land.
D. New Development:
The intent of the following policies is to establish a high quality, unifying
design image which promotes a sense of identity and reflects community
heritage and provide for safe and efficient traffic flow and optimum vehicular
and pedestrian access within the corridor.
Architecture DA The. architecture of new censtruction
shall reflect the heritage of Rancho
Cucamonga and relate to nearby
structures of community significance.
}�V Typically, design features of the
Virginia Dare and Thomas Brothers
wineries are considered -_ appropriate
(vine arbors, exposed beam3, ....
curvilinear gables, and arched window
openings) though other solutions
reflecting the City's heritage will
also be considered.
Pedestrian ^-- ientation 0.2 Site planning, including builoing
orientation and parking lot
configuration, shall enhance pedestrian.
connections on- and off -site. A
continuous pedestrian system is
° required in all new - Y-,rjOcts with
amenities such as plazas, shaded
seating alcoves, expanded walkways with
surface treatment, texturized pavement
across drive aisles, raised planters,
drinking fountains, trash receptacles,
w and covered walkways. In addition,
outdoor eating areas are encouraged.
Combined Access 0.3 Through the master planning process,
dr�weways onto Boulevard shall
ri
+, y
vCj
be coordinated for consistency with
existing City access policies (i.e.,
`
300' driveway !>eparation) to the extent
i
i '
practical, regardless of parcel width.
Public Transit D.4
s
Put„ is transit facilities shall be
considered within all master plans.
'nnventent pedestrian access shall be
provided from designated transit
faciliities, such as bus stops,
E. Non- Conforminq Lots /Structures:
The purpose of this section is to
allow continuance of existing uses and
structures undEr current conditions,
and promote consistency of design and
technical standards throughout the
study area at the time of development,
conversion, or redesign.
i
Master Planning E,1
New development and /or conversion of
existing residential buildi-Igs to a new
use is permitted on non L -- forming
lots, development
provided such is
approved and constructed as an integral
part of a Master. Planned development
,+ ._ .�
V�►
consistent with these policies and
��
Development Code standards.
Landscaping E.2 Regardless of parcel depth, all new
development shall provide a minimum_451
building setback and average
A�ty� streetscape landscaping (measured from
the ultimate curb face location) on
40. Foothill Boulevard.
E:3 Streetscape landscaping''and irrigation
shall, be required to,r the extent
practical in conjunction with
substantial. reconstruction, renovation
or exterior remodeling of.",gxisting
structures along Foothill Boulevard
involving the issuance of a building
permit.
I
'F
i,
CITY OF
RANCHO C[;CAi 0,NIGA
PLANNING CON INJISSION
AGE NTDA
Monday August 5, 1985 6 :00 P.M. (Dinner at 5:30 p.m.)
Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center - Room 4
9791 Arrow Highway
Rancho °Cucamonga, California
PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP
DEVELOPMENT REVIEtd 85 -31 - GATEWAY "RASTER PLAN
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85 -21 - 'aITER /RINKER
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - The development of a Master Plan for a acre
office business park and ,the first phase consisting of 3 office buildings
totaling 88,900 square `_set on 6.5 acres of land in the Industrial Park
District (Subarea 6) and the Haven Avenue Overlay District, located at the
northeast corner of ;4th Street and Haven Avenue APN 210 - 081 -1, 2, 3, 16.
.,, I. Introuuctory Comments 6:00 - 6:05
j II. Presentation by Reiter /Rinker Dev. Co. 6:05 6:20
If III. Staff Report by Nancy Fong, Assistant Planner 6:20 - 6:35
III. Discussion of Related Issues /Concerns 6:35 7:00
BREAK 7:00!)-'7:10
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY: INTERIM POLICIES Commission,�review of
interim policies to be applied to development projects alang <Foothill
Boulevard prior to adoption of the Foothill Boulevard,'--.
I. Staff Report 7 :10 7:30
II. Discussion of Goal /Interim. Policies 7:30 - 8:00
ADJOURNMENT: The Planning Commission wili adjourn to the August 14, 1985
regular meeting.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA.
STAFF REPORT
� GEC
O
z
CUCA MQQft,
r n
tt .l r
O
U >
1977 1
DATE: August 5, 1985
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner
BY: Curt Johnston, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: FOOTHILL BOULEVARD RRIDOR STUDY: INTERIM POLICIES -
Commission review of interim policies to be applied to
development projects along Foothill Boulevard prior to
adoption of Foothill Boulevard Plan.
I. BACKGROUND: This report is provided as a follow -up from the
previous meeting at which Commission reviewed the boundaries of the
study area, major issues, and goals. For discussion purposes, a
rough draft of the goal statement and interim policies is
provided. Since this is just a workshop, no formal action is
warranted, but in -depth discussion is critical. To guide the
decision making process, the policies must be written in a manner
allowing clear interpretation of the intent. This is particularly
true, given the twelve to eighteen month time frame of the Foothill
Study and the number of applications which are pending and /or
likely to be submitted.
II. GOALS STATEMENT: At the previous meeting four goals were presented .
relative to land use, urban design, traffic and circulation, and
economic viability. At this time, an overall and general goal
statement is provided for discussion purposes as a prelude to the
interim policies. Since it serves as a guide for development of
ttie interim policies, Cormission consensus will be required. In
spite of the complexity of issues, it should be kept as simple and
as tangible as possible.
III. INTERIM POLICIES: The first draft the the interim policies has
keen broke— n down into five categories: General Requirements, Land
Ise Amendments, Master Plan Development, New Development, and Non-
Conforming tots /Structures. The following is an outline of each
section.
A. General Requirement: The policies begin with the General'
Requirements which cover three topics; preliminary reviews,
time limits, and compatibility. The preliminary review
requirement was requested by the Plannning Carrmission at the
last meeting and covers all new projects. The policy could be
Timited ii- scope if desirable for only certain projects, like
multi - family residential and mini- ;;arehouses. Policy A.2
It
PLANNIt;u COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Foothill Blvd. Corridor Study; Interim Policies
August 5, 1965
Page 2
establishes a one -year initial approval limit to allow re-
assessment of projects soon after completion of the Foothill
Study. Extensions up to the normal 4 -year total could still be
O.,anted. Regarding compatibility, Policy A.1 reinforces land
use and design solutions currently in practice. This policy is
under the General Requirements section since it applies across
the board to land ;!Se, master planning, and new development,
B. Land Use Amendments:k. As written, Policy B.1 "discourages ".
General an Land Uie`,Amepdments, 'Two G.P.A.s, however, have
been submitted and wi!1,be reviewed on September 25, 1985, so
findings are provided F the Commission is in favor of a
particular project. l'-,.) /other options would be to not allow
submittal of any amendments (i..e. moratorium), or rely on the
current procedur�a, in which case the Commission most likely
will review a greater number of application during preparation
of the study. Regarding Development District Amendments,
Policy B.2 allows a6 ustments of boundaries within the
guidelines of the General'?lan Land Use Map. This provision is
intended to be a useful tool during the Master Plan process by
allowing flexibility. Another area not covered, but which the
Commission may wish to review is restrictions on certain land
uses in the General Commerical and Office Districts. The use
matrix for the Development Code is attached for your review.
The intent would be to discourage low intensity uses, such as
mini- warehouses, contractors yards, second hand stores, etc.
C. Master Plan Development: The Mast^? Plan requirements
cont- — a� ed in the inn -terim poV. ies are sim.lar to those approved
for Haven Avenue. The emphasis is on problem solving,
particularly in regard to strip commercial which is typlified
by fragmented develcment on a lot by lot basis, inconsistent in
design and improvements, and parking along the street scape.
In addition, master planning is intended to increase the
efficiency, site planning with combined circulation and
access.
D. New Deyel,,pme ' rchitectural and site plan `ng is discussed
in the section` cu.icerning new development. our basic design
philosophies are highlighted includ ntu winery -theme
architecture, pedestrian orientation, combined access, and
public transit. Specifying the architectural flavor is
intended to prohibit projects clearly inconsistent with the
community identity. However, the final Foothill Corridor Study
will be more specific in terms of design detail and dealing
with special areas such as Ftiwanda or the vicinity of the
Sycamore Inn._
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Foothill Blvd. Corridor Study: Interim Policies
August 5, 1985
Page 3
E. Non - Conforming Lots /Structures: At the previous meeting, the
Planning Commission strebsed urban design as a major issue.
Considering this, the adopted Foothill 'Plan must provide a
strategy to deal with existing non - conforming lets and
structures. At this ,point, it is difficult to establish
meaningful criteria. However, three interim policies are
provided which would restrict nerd development on non- conforming
lots unless constructed as part of an overall Master Plan
consistent with the Development Co4e. In practice, this would
be difficult to accomplish prior to completion of the Foothill
Plan. Mat,y of the small lots along Foothill Blvd. are only
7500 square feet (50' x 1501), whereas commercial and office
property must be a minimum cf 40,000 square feet (1751 x 200'
minimum dimensions). This ``would necessitate that lots be
coatiined °for planning purposes to allow joint parking, access,
etc.
In addition, the Development Code allows reduced building and
landscape setbacks on non- ,onforming lots which Poliry E.2
would override. Regarding re- design of existing bui'rdings,
Policy E.3 requires landscaping along the street frontage.
Since major expenditures to a building could substantially
extend its existence, the intent of the policy is to provide
some consistency with current standards. In addition to
landscaping, full street improvements including sidewalks and a
lien for the median island could be added; however, the cost of
these improvements could stifle any improvement efforts.
IV. RECOMMENDATION: As mentioned, the attached policies are in rough
draft and intenOed for workshop discussion purposes. With input
from the Commiss the policies will be re- worked and other
topics covered Further discussion and /or formal
action nubm c r the August 14th or 'August 28th meetings.
Respectfully ,
Otto Kroutil $
Senior Planner
- Ok :CJ:ko
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLAMIN G DIVISIC N
NORTH
ITEM: lL�.
TITLb
EXHIBIT. A , �, SCALE.
Miller Ave.
RAN-CI-10 OF
1 AN -CI-10 CUCAMO \TGi A
PLAMING DIVISION
ai
a
w
m
w
w
s
I-
MMM ra4
�a
r
NUlZTH
TITLE= ,' trams'
E:CI3IRIT =SCALE: �'
section 17.10.030 '
C. General Commercial District (00: This district is intended for general
commercial, activities snd services of a more intensive nature. Thesa uses would
be locate d primarily along major transportation routes and would include major
shopping facilities, major service - oriented uses, major f9nan^' ' .d corporate
headquarters which are designed to serve the City or the region as a whole.
Section 17.10.030 Use Regulations
Uses listed in Table 17.10.030 shall be allowable in one or more of the commercial
districts as indicated in the columns beneath each commercial district. Where indicated
with the letter "P ", the use shall be a permitted use in that district. Where indicated
with the letter "C" the use shall be a conditional use subject to the Conditionhl Use
Permit process. In the event th re Is difficulty ht c itegorizing a given use ir. one of the
districts, the procedure outlined inSeeticx 17.02.040 shall be followed.
TABI.131710.030 USE REGULATI0NS FOR CO14 r&RC 16 ,*O1?FICE IIISTRICT`7
USE OP No GC
A. Offices and Related Uses
1. Administrative and executive offices, P P P
2. Artist and photographic studios, not P P P
including the sale of equipment or
supplies.
3. Clerical and professional offices. P P P
1
4. Finan0al services and institutions. P P P
S. Medical, dental and related health P P P
services (noa- animal related) including
laboratories and clinics, only the sale of
articles clearly incidental to the services
provided shall be permitted.
6. Prescription pharmacies, (also when P P P
located within n bailding containing tha
offices of S or more medical practitioners)
';. Public buildings (library, city and county P P P
buildings, special districts and post
office).
S. Public utility service offices. P P P
9. Public Safety facility (police, fire, C C C
amhularca and paramedics)..
1
Sectioo 12.10.030
USE
AP
NC
GC
(f) Service , or gasoline dispensing
C
C
P
statio.,s° (including minor repair
I
such as tune -ups, brakes, batteries,
R
tires, mufflers)
(g) Pa, w and supplies
-
P
P
t'
10,
Bakeries (retail only).
-
P
P
'
11.
Barber and beauty shops.
P
P
P
12.
Bicycle shops.
-
F
P
P
P
P
13.
Blueprint and photocopy services
14.
Boat and camper sales and services.
-
-
C
15.
Book, gift and stationary stores (other
0
P
P
than adult related material).
16.
Candy stores and confectionaries.
-
P
P
17.
Catering establishments.
-
-
P
18.
Grzaning and pressing establishments.
C
P
P'
19.
Carpenter shop or cabinet shop.
-
-
P
I
20.
Cocktail lounge (bar, lounge, tavern)
including related entertainment.
(a) Operated independent - of a
C
-
C
restaurant
(b) Accessory to a restaurant
C
C
C
F
21.
Commercial recreation facilities.
(a) indoor uses such as bowling,
C
C
P
theaters, billards,
(b) Outdoor uses such as golf, tennis,
C
C
C
basketball, baseball, trampolines,
22.
Contractor yards (screening of outdoor
-
-
C
storage required).
23.
Dairy product stores.
+
P
P
i
Section 17.10.030
OP
NC
GC
24.
Dc-ll rtment stores.
_
_
p
25.
Drive -in businesses, including theaters.
C
C
(other than fast food restaurants)
26.
Drug stores and pharmacies,
-
P
P
27.
Equipment rental yards.
-
-
C
28.
Fast-food restaurants.
C
C
P
29.
Feed/Taek stores
-
C
P
30.
Florist shops.
P
P
P
31.
Food stores and supermarkets.
-
P
P
32.
Furniture stores, repair and upholstery.
-
P
P
33.
General retail stores.
-
P
P
34.
Hardware stores.
-
P
P
35.
Home improvement centers.
(a) Material stored and sold within
-
P
P
enclosed buildings
(b) Outdoor storage of material such as
-
-
C
lumber & building materials
36.
Hotels ead Motels.
C
-
p
37.
lee Machines (outdoor).
-
C
C
38.
Jenitoral services and supplies.
C
P
P
39.
Jewelry stores.
-
P
P
40.
Laundry -self- service.
-
P•
P
t
41.
Liquor stores.
-
P
P
42.
Kiosks for key shops, film drops, etc. in
-
C
C
parking lots.
43.
L•cksmith shop.
-
P
P
:
44.
Mini- storage for public use (no outdoor
storage).
l,g
9
Section 17.10.030
USE
f1P
Kc
GC
4'.
Mortuaries and cemeteries.
C
C
C
46.
Moto.eycle sales end service.
-
-
C
47.
Newspaper arad magazine stores, printing
-
C
P
G
and publishing,
48.
Nurseries and garden supply stores;
-
P
P
provided, in the NC district, all
.
equipment, supplies and material are kept
within an enclosed area.
49.
Office and business machine stores.
C
P
P
50.
ParVng facilities (comme Sal) where fees
C
-
P
are charged.
51.
Political or philanthropic headquarters.
C
C
P
52.
Pet shop.
-
P
P
53.
Plumbing shop and supplies.
-
-
P
n_
i 54.
Photocopy
P
P
P
I
55.
Pinting shops.
56.
Restaurants (other than fast food).
(a) With entertainment and /or serving
C
C
P
of alcoholic beverages
(b) Incidental serving of beer and wine
P
P
P
but without .z eacktail lounge, bar,
entertainment or dancing
57.
Recreational Yehicle.Storage Yard.
C
C
C
5f-
Shoe stores, sales and repair.
_
P
P
59.
Second-hand stores and pawn shops.
-
P
60.
Shopping Center subject to provisions in
-
C
C
Section 17.10.030-P.5.
61.
Spiritualist readings or astrology
-
P
forecasting.
62,
,Sporting goods stores.
-
P
P
63.
Stamp and coin shops.
-
P
P
l,g
9
Section 17.10.030
i
OP
kc
GC
64.
Swimming pool supplies.
_
v
p
65.
Tailor.
k
P
66.
Taxidermists.
_
P
67.
Television, radio sales and service.
-
P
p
88.
Tire sales and service.
-
-
C
68.
Tod' stores.
_
P,
p
70.
Travel agencies.
P
P
P
71.
`1'rrnerportation facilities (train and bus,
C
C
C
taxi depots).
7 'a.
Truck and trailer rental, sales and service.
-
-
C
73.
variety stores.
-
P
P
74.
Vehicular sterage'.yard and towing service.
-
C
l
C. Public and semi -public uses
1.
Day Care Facilities
C
C
C
2.
Con,ialeseent facilities and hospitals.
C
C
S.
Friv,ite and publie clubs and lodges,
C
C
C
including YMCA, YWCA and similar youth
group uses.
4.
Educational institutions, parochial, private
C
C
(including colleges and universities).
5.
Libraries & museums, public or private.
C
C
C
6.
Parks and recreation facilities,. public or
C
C
C
private.
7.
Public utility installations.
C
C
G
8.
Vneational or business trade schools.
C
C
C
9.
Churches, convonts, monasteries and;other
C
G
C
ROUGH DRAFT
FOOTHILL CORRIDOR INTERIM POLICIES
INTRODUCTION
The following Goal Statement and - Interim Policies are provided to guide the
decision making process during p eparation of thzi Foothill Boulevard Corridor
Study. The policies address basic land use and urban design issues unique to
the Foothill Corridor, and are intended to be applied in conjunction with the
Development Code.
The boundaries of the Study Area include commercial, office, and residential
properties along Foothill BouTr: +vard, ranging from the west city limit at Grove
Avenue to Deer Creek Channel, and from the Devore freeway to the east city
limit at East Avenue.
GOAL STATEMENT
Goals define community aspirations and intentions. The following Goal for
Foothill Boulevard attempts to boil down a complex set of issues dealing with
land use, urban design, traffic and circulation, and economic viability into a
comprehensive, understandable and achievable statement:
Establish a high quality, unifying, and attractive design image
reflective of community heritage, and provide a viable setting
for a balanced mixture of residential and commercial activities
with safe and efficient traffic circulation and access.
I.
Based on this goal, the following Interim Policies are provided to address
t development related issues during preparation of the Foothill Corridor Study.
R 0 U G H ORAFT
INTERIM POLICIES
r_
G
A. General Requirements:
Preliminary Review A.1 Prior to processing development /design
review applications within the study
0 r "`
f7 area the Planning Commission shall
conduct -a preliminary review to
% I de? mine compliance with the Interim
Goal and Policies contained erein. The
intent is to provide direction to the
�Y �
1 applicant and staff early in the review
process and avoid undue time delays or
expenditures.
Time Limits VI A.2 Time limits for approval of development
proposals shall expire one (1) year
from the date of approval. Extensions
up to a total of four (4) years may be
ranted o
g my upon determination,`ithat
the subject applicatim and conditions
of approval are in substantial
compliance with current design
standards for the study area.
C
Compatibility:
A.3 All land use and development proposals
a
shall consider the impact on adjoining
properties, partip;uldrly residential
uses, and mitigate potential conflicts
to the extent practical. Mitigation
t,Y ljd w •
measures may typically include, but are
not limited to, transition of buiTding
height, architectural form, density,
landscape buffers, sound attenuation,
visual barrier and /or grading
conditions to disrupt line -of -sight
concerns, and alternative circulation
and access.
r B. Land Use Amendments:
The intent of the following
� g
'
policies is to provide a viable, setting for a
balanced mixture of residential and commercial activities of community Wide
significance compatible with
surrounding land uses.
General Plan
B.1 Applications for General Plan Land Use
Amendments are discouraged. Prior to
Wks
approval of any such amendment,
however, the Planning Commission shall
make the following findings:
a. The proposed amendment is
consistent with the intent and
purpose of the inte.im policies for
the Foothill reulevard corrioor,
b. The proposed land use is compatible
with surrounding existing or
planned development,
c. The proposed _ ?and use will not
create significant traffic or
circulation impacts. j
d. The proposed land use 1 11 - -not be
detrimental to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
8.2 Adjustments to Development District ;
boundaries may be considered where
necessary to achieve more logical and
efficient land use and site planning
patterns, if consistent with the
General Plan Land Use Element.
,r
s
ii
C. Master Planned Development:
s,
The purpose of this section is to provide for integrated development at the,
earliest possible time in the review process. Master planning of defined
areas will avoid development of single parcels of land it a manner which
prevents or precludes future development of adjacent parcels in the best way,
feasible. The specific intent is to reco" ize and wive problems before they
occur and take advantage of opportunities wide the%` ex`st,
Plaster Planning CA A conceptual Master Plan shall be
required for Planning Commisgion review
ls� in conjunction with development
"� proposals wherever necessary to assure
integrated development, enhance
harmonious and orderly development,
mitigate site constraints on adjoining
property and maximize land potential.
\
The area of Master Plans ^hall not be
confined by individual lot lines, but
1
determined by logical planning
boundaries and site conditions as
j required by the City Planner.
C.2 At a minimum, Master Plans shall
ind;cate conceptual building locations
and orientation, overall "circulation,
points of ingress and egress, parking
I
lot layouts landscaped areas and
pedestrian nodes, •circulation. In
addition, the City Planner may require
other information as deeme,i necessary
to assure consistency ;Ott, the intent
of these policies,
C.3 'Through the master plan process, land
use and site planning shall be
coordinated to e..hance opportunities
for quality development consistent with
the standards for Foothill Boulevard,
f
I
de- emphasize "strip- commercial" by
creating o ^,ganiaed groups of structures
and uses, and provide for efficient
utilization of land.
i
D. New Development: ?j
f The intent of the following policies is to establish a high quality, unifying
design image which promotes a sense of identity and` reflects community
heritage and provide for safe and efficient traffic flow and optimum vehicular
and pedestrian access within the corridor.
Architecture - 0.1 The architecture of new construction_
shall reflect the heritage of Rancho
Cucamonga and relate to nearby
structures of community si
significance.
g
Typically,
UIA
design features of the
Virginia Dare and Thomas Brothers
wineries are considered appropriate
(vine arbors, exposed beams, arcades,
curvilinear gabies, and arched window
openings) though other solutions
reflecting the City's heritage will
also be considered.
Pedestrian Orientation D.2
Site planning, including building
i
orientation and parking lot
configuration,-shall enhance pedestrian
connections on- and off -site. A
continuous pedestrian system is
required in all new projects with
amenities such as plazas, shaded
seating alcoves, expanded walkways with
surface treatment, texturized pavement
across drive aisles, _raised planters,
drinking fountains, tiiash receptacles,
and covered walkways. In addition,
outdoor eating areas are encouraged.
Combined Access D.3
Through the master planning process,
driveways onto Foothill Boulevard shall
EP be coordinated for consistency with
_ ^ , ► � existing City .access policies (i.a.,
3001 driveway separation) to the extent
practical, regardless of parcel width.
Public Transit DA Public transit facilities shall be
considered within all master plans.
Convenient pedestrian access shall be
provided from designated transit
facilities, such as bus stops.
E. None- Conforming Lots /Structures:
The purpose of this sect"A is to allow continuance of existing uses and
structures under current conditions, and promote consistency of design and
technical standards throughout the study area at the time of development,
conversion, or redesign.
Master Planning EJ
Volp
New development and /or conversion of
existing residential buildings to a new
use is permitted on non - conforming
lots, provided such development is
approved and constructed as an integral
-part of a Master Planned development
consistent with these policies and
Development Code standards.
lY
Landscaping E.2 Regardless of parcel depth, all new
development shall provide a minimum 45'
building setback and average
streetscape landscaping (measured trued
the ultimate curb face location) on
�1� ✓� �, Foothill Boulevard.
E.3 Straetscape landscaping and irrigation
shall be required to the extent
practical in conjunction with
substantial reconstruction, renova_ion
or exterior remodeling of existing
st"L'ctures along Foothill Boulevard
involving the issuance of a building
permit.
`r
E
2
CITY O e RAi4CHO CUCCCONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: August 5, 1985
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner
BY: Nancy Fong, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANu DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85 -31
I.
a a�
1977
REITER /RINKER - The development of a master plan for a 44
acre o ice usiness park and the first phase consisting
of 3 office buildings totaling 88,900 square feet, on 6.5
acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6),
and Haven Avenue Overlay District, located at the
northeast corner of 4th Street and Haven Avenue - APN 210-
081-1, 2, 3 and 16.
II. BACKGROUND: In designing the Master Plan, the developer has
incorporated porated the recommendations of the expanded initial study in
mitigating the environmental concerns of traffic /circulation, wind,
noise, grading and drainage. Also, the developer has worked with
Staff for the past three months thmigh a series of preliminary
reviews to develop a Master Plan for the Gateway, consistent with
the policies of the Haven Avenue Overlay District. Copies of the
Master Plan text and the expanded initial study have been a;
LM
PLANNING ZOMMISSION;S (-;: REPORT
Development Review 85
August 5, 1935
Page #2
1.
III. SITE CHARACTERISTICS. The site is vacant and vegetation consists
of abandoned vineyards and a row of mature tre., opposite the
centerline of Trademark Avenue. The site slopes in a north /south
direction at approximately ?%. (See Page 2••2 )f the Master Plan.
Text.)
IV. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The overall circulation plan includes; art
interior loop street designed as a public street with connections
to 4th Street and Utica Avenue. The Site Plan consists of
buildings clustered around plaza areas linked with pedestrian
walkways, and arcades throughout the site. the proposed land use
orientates the office and business buildingz along Haven Avenue
within the urban center at the intersectio. ;,f 4th Street and Haven
Avenue. The northeast quadrant of the site has been planned for
light industrial, research and development use', to serve as a
buffer from the more intensive industrial use to the east such as
General Dynamics. Visually, the urban center is the focus of the
Master "Plan, with mid -rise level office buildings that taper off to
low -rise industrial R and D building to -Kei northeast quadrant of
the site.
V. ISSUES•
Issue #1: Does the proRosed Master Plan c ly with the
eeo o ment o ices a ttre even venue Oyer ay
:y.sti lc —`
Comments: The attached checklist may be used as a guide.
Staff recommends that more specific information be
provide) to address a Uniform Sign Program (wail
and monument), and public transit facilities (e.g.
bus stops).
Issue #2: Should a public streey connection be orwrided to
the north as shown in the circulation ?- of the
Industrial _ Specific an versus the proposed
private rivewar k5eee Exhibit "A ".)
CoRoient: The City may consider this private driveway if the
developer could assure that it will provide
adequate access to the north and could provide for
integrated development. This could be achieved
through Master Panning circulation for ail
parcels up to 6th Street. However, the
Engineering 'Division recommends that a public
street connection be provided.
a` PLANNING COMMISSION S"° ° REPORT
De-,ielopment Review 85 a +�
A;; gust 5; 1985
Page #3
C
r
Issue #3: Can trademark parkway be built, in phases? (See
i titan T'agc -
Commnt:s the backbone of the circulation system it is
recommended that trademark parkway be installed
$, with Phase I. Construction at one time provides
opportunity to plant street trees early on to
t` establish maturity much earlier for aestheti and
marketing benefits.
0
VI. RECOMME(iJATION: The Planning Commission should ;..,ovide specific
direction to Staff and to the developer relative to the proposed
Master Plan:
A. Adequacv of the Master Plan and text in complying with the
development policies of the Haven Avenue Overlay District.
B. Design Review Comments on Phase I development.
Re, ectfull submitted,
Da eman
Senior Planner
DC:NF:cv
Attachments: Master Plan Text
Expanded Initial Study
Exhibit "A" - ISP Subarea 6
Haven Avenue Project Review Check List
CITY OF RANCHO CUCANiONGA
STAYi REPORT.
r'UC�AMOMe9c7
: 1. 1 r
O'
fI
� a
1977
DATE: August 5, 1985
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Otto Kroutil, Senior Pianrar
BY: Curt Johnston, Asso,.iate Planner
SUBJECT: = OOTHILL BOULEVARO CORRIDOR STUDY: INTERIM POLICIES -
Commission review of interim policies to be applied to
development projects along Foothill Boulevard prior to
adoption of Foothill Boulevard Plan.
I. BACKGROUND: This report is provided as a follow -up from °-,!
previous meeting at which Coffaission reviewed the boundaries of the
study area, major issues, and goals. For discussion purposes, a
rough draft of the goal statement Pnd interim policies is
provided. Since this is just a workshop, no formal action is
warranted, but in -depth discussion is critical. To guide the
decision making process, the policies must be written in a manner
allowing clear interpretation of the intent. This is particularly
true, given the twelve to eighteen month time frame of the Foothill
S}udy and the number of applications which are pending and /or
likely to be submitted.
II. GOALS STATEMENT; At the previous meeting four goals were presented
relative to land rse, urban design, -traffic and circulation, and
economic viability. At this time, an overall and general goal
statement is provided for discussion purposes as a preludf: to the
interim policies. Since it serves as a guide for development of
the interim policies, Commission consensus will be required. In
spite of the complexity of issues, it should be kept as simple and
as tangible as possible.
III. INTERIM POLICIES: The first draft the the interim policies has
been broken d own into five categories: General Requirements, Land
Uae Amendments, Master Plan Development, Nea Development, and Non -
Conforming Lots /Structures. The following is an outline of each
section.
A. General Requirement: The policies begin with the General
R(00:,uir� menu which— cover three topics; preliminary reviews,
time limits, and compatibility. The preliminary review
requirement was requested by the Plannning Commission at the
last meeting and covers all new projects. The policy could be
limited in scope if desirable for only certaiin projects, like
multi - family residential and mini- warehouses. Policy A.2
i
,t
PLAW NG COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Foothill Blvd. Corridor Study: interim Policies
August 5, 1985
Page 2
establishes a one -year in "?ial approval limit to allo re-
assessment of projects soon after completion of the Foothill
Study. Extensions up to the normal 4 -year total could still be
granted. Regarding compatibility, Policy A.1 reinforces land
use and design solutions currently in practice. This policy is
under the General Requirements section since it applies across
the board to land use, master planning, and new development.
B. Land Use Amendments: As written, Policy B.1 "discourages"
-enera an land Use Amendments. Two G.P.A.s, however, have
been submitted and will be reviewed on Sept(., -`,er 25 1985, so
findings are provided if the Commission is-'in favor of a
particular project. Two other optiins would be to not allow
submittal of any amendments (i.e. moratorium), or rely on the
current procedure, in which case�the Commission most likely
will review a greater nuatber of application during preparation
of the study. Regarding Development District Amendments,
Policy -B.2 allows adjustments of boundaries within the
guidelines of the General Plan Land Use Map. This provision is
tended to be a useful tool during the Master Plan process by
allowing -flexibility. Another area not covered, but which the
Commission may wish to review 3s restrictions on certain land
uses in the General Commerical and Office Districts. The use
matrix for the Development Code is attached for your review.
The intent would be to discourage low intensity uses, such as
mini - warehouses, contractors yards, second hand stores, etc.
C. Master Plan Development: The Master Plan requirements
contained in the interim policies are similar to those approved
for Haven Avenue. The emphasis is on problem solving,
particularly in regard to strip commercial which is typlifiad
by fragmented develoment on a lot by lot basis,, inconsistent in
design and improvements, and parking along the street scape.
In addition, master planning is intended to increase the
efficiency of site planning with combined circulation and
access.
D. New Development: Architectural and site planning is discussed
in the section concerning new development. Four basic design
philosophies are highlighted including; winery -theme
architecture, pedestrin orientation, combined access, and
public transit. Spec °ying the architectural flavor is
intended to prohibit projects clearly inconsistent with the
community identity. However, the final Foothill Corridor Study
will be more specific in terms of design detail and dealing
with special areas such as Etiwanda or the vicinity of the
Sycamore Inn.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Foothi l Blvd. Corridor Study: Interim Policies
August 5, 1985
Page 3
E. Non - Conforming Lots /Structures: At the previous meeting, the
Planning Commission stressed urban design as a major issue.
Considering this, the adopted Foothill Plan must provide_ a
strategy to deal with existing non-conforming_ dots and
structures. At this point, it is difficult to- establish
meaningful criteria. ,However, three interim policies are
provided which would restrict new development on, non- conforming
lots unless constructed.,-as part of...an overall :Master _Plan
consistent with the Development Code, In practice, this would
be difficult to accomplish prior to completion of the Foothill
Plan. Many of the small lots along Foothill Blvd, are only
7500 square feet (50' x 150% whereas commercial and office
property must be a minimum of 40,000 square feet (175' x 200'
minimum dimensions). ' iiis would necessitate that lots be
combined for planning purposes to allow joint parking, access,
etc.
In ad4ition, the Development Cade allows reducad building and
landscape setbacks on non- conforming lots which Policy E.2
would override:. Regarding re- design of existing buildings,
Policy E.3 requires landscaping along ;the street frontage.
Since major expenditures to a buildin- could substantially
extend its existence, the intent of the policy is to provide
some consistency with current standards. In addition to
landscaping, full street improvements including sidewalks and a I
lien for the median island could be added; however, the cost of
these improvements could stifle any improvement efforts.
IV. RECOMMENDATION: As mentioned, Lhe attached policies are in rough
draft and intended for workshop discussion purposes. With input
from the Commissyp, the policies will be re- worked and other
topics covered ecessa:y. Further discussion and /or formal
action cou occ r t the August 14th or August.28th meetings.
Respectfully ubm t6f
Otto Kroutil 1
Senior Flanner
OK•CJ:ko
il
E
- CITY OF
%z NCHO CUCA1V ONGA
PLANNING DIVMNT
ITEM: A
TITLE
EXHIBIT. /,SCALE: "®"'
NORTH
Section 17.10.030"
C. General Commercial DiTtrict (GC): This district is 'intended for general
commercial activities and services of a more intensive nature. These uses would
be located primarily along major transportation routes and would include major
_ shopping facilities, major service - oriented uses, major fnAncial and corporate
headquartQrs which are designed to save the City or the region as a whole.
Section 17.10.030 Use Regulations
Uses listed in Table 17.10.030'; shall be allowable in one. or more of the commercial
districts as indicated in the columns beneath each comme:.:ial district. Where.indicated
with the letter "PI'; the use shall be a permitted use in tha; •district. Where indicated
with the letter "C", the use shall be a: conditional use subje"t to the .Conditional Use
Permit pr*cess. In the event there is difficulty in categorizing,; a given use in one of the
districts, the procedure outlined in Section 17.02.040 shall be foD :Wev.
TABLE 1710. 030 ",3SE REGULATIOtc;S FOR COMMERCIAL /62PICB DISTRICTS
USE OP NC GC
A. Offices and Related Uses
1. Administrative and executive offices. P P P
2, artist and photographic studios,. not P P P
including the sale of equipment or
supplies.
3. Clerical and professional offices. P P P
E 4. Financial services and institutions. P P P
5. medical, dental and related health P P P
services (non- animal related) including'
laboratories and clinics; only the sale of
articles clearly incidental to the services
provided shall be permitted.
6. Prescription pharmacies, (also when P P P
located within a building containing the
offices of 5 or more medical practitioners)
7. Public buildings (library, city and county P E P'
buildings, special districts and post
officel.
8. Public utility service offices. P P P
9. Public safety facility (police, fire, C C C
ambulance and paramedics).
Section 17.10.030
USE
OP
IBC
GC
'
(f) Service or gssoline dispensing
C
C
P
stations (including minor repair
such as ttme -ups, brakes, batteries,
tires, mufflers)
(g) Parts and supplies
P
10.
Bakeries (retail only).
-
P
P
11.
Barber and beauty shops.
P
P
P'
4 12.
'Acycle shops.
-
P
p
P
P
P
13.
Blueprint and photocopy services
14.
Boat and camper sales and services.
-
-
C
t 15.
Book, gift and stationary stores (other
C
P
p
G.
than adult related material).
M
Candy stores and confectionaries.
-
P
P
r 17.
Catering establishments.
-
-
P
�
18.
s
Cleaning and pressing establishments.
C
P
P
C 19.
Carpenter shop or cabinet shop.
-
-
P
20.
Cocktail lounge (bar,. lounge, tavern)
including related entertainment.
(a) Operated independent • of a
C
-
C
restaurant
(b) Accessory to a restaurant
C
C
C
21.
Commercial recreation facilities.
(a) Indoor uses such as bowling,
C
C
P
theaters, billards,
(b) Outdoor uses such as golf, tennis,
C
C
C
basketball, baseball, trampolines,
etc.
" 22.
Contractor yards (screening of outdoor
-
C
storage required).
23.
Dairy product stores.
-
P
z
42. Kiosks for key shops, fin drops, etc. in - C C
parking lots.
43. Locksmith shop. - P P
44. Mini- storage for public use (ne.. cstdoor - - C
storage).
�b
Section 17.10, 30
USE
OP
NC
GC '
24.
Department stores.
-
-
P
25.
Drive -in businesses, including theaters.
-
C
C
(other than fast food restaurants)
26.
Drug stores and pharmacies.
-
P
P
27.
Equipment rental yards.
-
-
C
28.
Fast-food restaurants.
C
C
P
29.
Feed /Tack stoma
-
C
P
30.
Florist shops. -
P
P
P
31.
Food stores and supermarkets.
-
P
P
32.
Furniture stores, repair and upholstery.
-
P
P
33.
General retail stores.
-
P
P
34.
Hardware stores.
-
P
P
35.
Home improvement centers.
(a) Material stored and sold within
-
P
P
enclosed buildings
(b) Outdoor storage of material such as
-
-
C
lumber do building materials
36.
Hotels and Motels.
C
-
P
37.
Ice Machines (outdoor).
-
t+
C
38.
Janitoral services and supplies.
C
P
P
39.
Jewelry stores.
-
P
P
40.
Laundry- self - service.
-
P''
P
41.
Liquor stores.
-
P
P
42. Kiosks for key shops, fin drops, etc. in - C C
parking lots.
43. Locksmith shop. - P P
44. Mini- storage for public use (ne.. cstdoor - - C
storage).
�b
I
Section 17.lC..30
GC
USE
V?
NC
45.
Mortuaries and cemeteries.
C
C
C
46.
Motorcycle sales and service.
-
-
C
47.
Newspaper and magazine stores, printing
-
C
P
and publishing.
48.
Nurseries and garden supply stores;
-
P
P
provided, in the NC district, all
equipment, supplies and material are kept
within an snclo-d aree,,.
49.
Office and business machine stores.
C
P
P
50.
Parking facilities (commerci4 where fees
C
-
P
w are charged.
51.
Political or philanthropic headquarters.
C
C
P
52.
Pet shop.
-
P
n
53.
Plumbing shop and supplies.
-
-
P
54.
K- itocopy
P
P
P
55.
Printing shops.
-
-
P
56.
Restavrants (outer than fast food).
(a) With entertainment and /or serving
C
C
P
of alcoholic beverages
(b) !-+cidental serving of beer and wine
P
P
P
but without a cocktail lounge, bar,
entertainment or dancing
57.
Recreational Vehicle Storage Yard.
C
C
C
58.
Shoe stores, sales and repair.
-
P
1'
59.
Second - hand stores and pawn shops:
-
-
P
60.
Shoppmg Center subject to provisions in
-
C
C
4.
Section 17.10.030 -F.5.
61.
Spirituelist readings z astrology
-
-
P
forec ^Ming.
"32.
Sporting goods stores.
-
P
P
63.
Stamp pid coin shops.
-
P
P
Section 17.10.030
GC
IISE
OP
NC
64.
Swimming pool supplies.
-
P
P
65.
Tailor.
-
P
P
66.
Taxidermists. -
-
-
P
67.
Television, radix s41es and service.
-
P
P
68.
Tire sales and service.
-
-
C
69.
Toy stores.
-
P
P
70.
Travel agencies.
P
P
P
71.
Transportation facilities (train and bus,
C
C
taza depots).
72.
Truck and trailer rental, sales and service.
-
-
C
73.
Variety stores. _ ==
-
P
P
74.
Vehicular storage yard and towing service.
-
-
C
j
C. Public and semi -public uses
1.
Day Care Facilities
C
C
C
2.
Convalescent facilities and hospitals.
C
-
C
3.
Private and public clubs and lodges,
C
C
C
including YM ,A, YWCA and similar youth
group uses.
4.
Educational institutions, parochial, private
C
C
C
(including collages 6h•3 universities).
5.
Libraries ct. museums, public or private,
C
C
C
6.
Parks and recreation facilities, public or
C
C
C
private.
7.
Public utility installations.
C
C
C
8.
Vocau( nal or business trade schools.
C
C
C
9.
Churches, convents, monasteries and other
C
C
C
religious institutions.
110UGIi DRAFT
FOOTHILL'CORRIDOR INTERIM POLICIES
INTRODJCTION
The following Goal Statement and Interim Policies are provided to guide the
decision making process during preparation of the Foothill Boulevard Corridor
Study. The policies address basic land use and urban design issues unique to
the Foothill Corridor, and are intended to be applied in conjunctirn with the
Development Code.
The boundaries of the Study Area include commercial, office, and residential
properties along Foothill Boulevard, ranging from the west city li it at GrovE.
Avenue to Deer Creek Channel, and from the Devore Freeway to the east city
limit at East Avenue.
GOAL STATEMENT
Goals define community aspirations and intentions. The following Goal for
Foothill Boulevard attempts to boil down a complex :t of issues dealing with
land use, urban design, traffic and circulation, and economic viability into a.
comprehensive, understandable and achievable statement:
Establish a high quality, unifying, and attractive design image
reflective of community heiritage, and provide a viable setting
r
for a balanced mixture of residential and commercial activities
with safe and efficient traffic circulation and access.
Based on this goal, the following Interim Policies are provided to .address
development related issues during preparation of the Foothill Corridor Study..
ROUGH DRAFT
INTERIM POLICIES
A. General Requirements:
Preliminary Review A.h Prior to processing development /design
• we 47P review applications within the study
,,may, � � I `1 area the Planninj Commission shat)
�'' <-rw I conduct a preliminary review to
W determine compliance with the Interim
Goal and Policies cantained herein. The
intent is to provide direction to the
applicant and staff early in the review
process and avoid undue time delays or
e „penditures.
Time Limits
r
r•`
A.2 Time limits for approval of development
proposal: shall expire one (2) year
from the date of approval. Extensions
up to a total of four (4) years :nay be
' granted only upon determination that
the subject application and conditions
of approval are in substantial
compliance with current desgn
standards for the study area.
fa- _.
I
Compatibility:
A.3 All land use and development proposals
shall consider tha irtoact on adjoining
properties, particularly residential
"
uses, and mitigate potential conflicts
1
to the extent practical. Mitigation
'a
measures may typically include, but are
not .limited to, tre•,isition of building
height, architectural form, density,
landscape buffers, sound attenuation,
i
visual barrier and /or grading
conditions to disrupt sine -of -sent
concerns, and alternative circulation
and access.
B. Land "Use Amendments:
The ir; °-?nt of the following
policies is to provide a/ viable setting for a
balanced mixture of residential and commercial act:viti'es of commus.ity wide
significance compatible with
surrounding land uses.
General Plan
B.1 Applications for denerar Plan Land Use
Amendments are discouraged. Prior to
such amendment,
approval, of any s
"
"however, the Planning, . Comnission shall
y
make the following Findings:
/3
j;.
1
r'
i a. The proposea amendment is
consistent with the intent and
purpose of the interim policies •ior
the Foothill Boulevard corridor.
b. The proposed land use is compatible
with surrounding existing or
planned developme.it.'
c. The proposed land use will not
create signif,can•t traffic or
circulation impacts.
d. The proposed land use wi;l not be
detrir -atal to properties or
i:aprovements in the vicinity,
6.2 Adjustments Development District
boinidaries may be considered where
neeassary co achieve more logical and
efficient land use and site, plarning
patterns, if consistent with the
I,
Genera[ Plan Land Use Elemant.
C. Master Planned Development:. 1
The purpose of this sectici'-is to provide for integrated development at the
earliest possible time in the review akocess. Master planning of defined
areas will avoid development of single` parcels of Und in a manner which
prevents or p-ecl; es future development of adjacent'oarcels in the best ray
feasible.• The saE.ific,i:ntent is to recognize and solve-problems- before they
occur and take advantage of opportunities while they erisc.
Master Planning CA A' conceptual Maier Plan shall be
�r � required for P7- anning Unninis:�ion revi(.-w
in conjunction with developrt;�_nt
prcposals wherever necessary ca assure
integrated development, enhance
/ • harmonious and orderly , development,
mitigate site constraints on adjoininL,
property and maximize land potential.
k dpi The area of Master Plans sha l nat be
confined by individual lot lines, but
determined by logical- planning
boundaries and site conditions as
required by the City Plarner.
C.2 At 'a minimum, Master Plans shall
indicate conceptual building lfxations -;
and orientation, overall' circulation,
points of ingress and egress, parking
f',
E
t
lot iayouts, landscaped areas and
pedestrian nodes, circulation. in
addition, the Ci:y Planner may require
' other info ,oration as deemed necessary
to assu 'consistency with the intent
of these policies,
C.3 Through the master plan process, land
use and site planning shall be
coordinated to enhance o,,portunities
for quality development'cosisistent with
the standards for Foothill Boulevard,
de- emphasize "strip - coixmercial by
creating organized groups of stt-, Mures
and uses, and provide for efficient
utilization of land.
D. New Usvelow lkl;
The intent cf the following policies',` is to establish a high quality, unifying
design image which promotes a sense of identity and reflects community
heritage and provide for safe and efficient traffic flow and optimum vehicular „
and pedar:trian access within the corridor.
Architecture DA The architecture of new construction
shall reflect the heritage of Rancho
Pedestrian Orientation D.2
Combined Access 0.3
0.
Cucamonga and relate to nearby
structures of community significance.
Typically, design features of the
Virginia Dare and Thomas Brothers
wineries are considered appropriate
(vine arbors, exposed beams, arcades,;,
curvilinear gables, and arched ° window
openings) though other :solutions
reflecting the City's heritage will
also be considered.
Site planning, including building
orientation and parking lot
configuration, shall enhance pedestrian
connections on -' and off-site. A
continuous pedestrian syst(A is
required in all new projects with
amenities such as plazas, shaded
seating alcoves, expanded walkways with
surface treatment, texturized pavement
across drive aisles, ^aised planters,
drin;;ing fountains, trash receptacles,
and covered walkways. In addition,
outdoor eating areas are encouraged.
Through,, the master'' planning process,
driveways onto Foothill Boulevard shall'
Public Transit 0.4
E. iron- Conforming Lots /Structures:
be coordinated for consistency with
existing ;.ity access policies (i.e.,
300' driveway separation) to the extent
practical, regardless of parcel width.
Public transit facilities shall be
considered within all master plans.
Convenient {pedestrian access shall be
provided from designated 'transit
facilities, such as bus stops.
The purpose of this section is to allow continuance of existing uses and
structures under current conditions, and promote consistency of dezign and
technical standards throughout the study area at the time of development,
conversion, or redesign.
Master Planning E.1 New development and /or conversion of
existing residential buildings to a new
use is permitted on non- confsrm:ng
lots, provided such development is
49f approvEZ` and constructed as an integral
�
i�,. part of a Master Planned development.
i ,�T consistent with these policies and
VO Development Code standards.
ID
k ,j Q
,r
Landscaping . 6.2
Regardless
of parcel depth, all new'
development
shall provide a minimum 45'
building
setback and average
1
streetscape
landscaping (measured from
6�
the ultimate
curb face location) on
Foothlll Boulevard.
t
E.3
Streetscape
landscaping and irrigation
shall be
required to the extent
practical
in conjunction with
substantial
reconstruction, renovation
or exterior
remodeling of existing
structur?s
along .Foothill Bovlevard
involving the uance of a building
permit.
r
_-