Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986/06/25 - Agenda Packetn �,l Tv t A f C t C Mi ON JAG 1977 *FDIQESDAY. JUNE 25, 1986 " 7.00 p.m. a LtOPS ?AM f30.►1iMtT=— YOfi=l 9162 BASE LIRE RA1 x110 CKGAMOWGA, CALWOR10A, L Piedge,.of Allegiance V_ Roll Call. Commissioner Barker Commissioner Rempel- Commissioner Chitiea Commissioner Stout Commissioner McNiel Il Amiouncemen s 'IV. Consent, Calendar The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted on by the Commission at r;,.-3 time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. A. RESOLUTION OF DENIAL - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE -z TRACT 12991 - SHELBOUIrJE - A total residential subdivision and design review of 49 single family lots on 8.9 aeres of land in the Low Medium Residential District, located at the south side of 'Lemon Avenue, 500 feet ease of Archibald Avenue - APN 201- 252 -21, 22, (Continued from May 28, 1986 meeting.) B. BERYL PARK - WEST EXTENSION CONCEP'T'UAL MASTER PLAN - Continued fFom June 11 198E meeting. V. Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name'.and address. All such `opinions shall'lh? limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. ME C, ENMONMI ENTAL ASSESS:IGIENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 32911 -LEON - Iievelopmetit of a 7 1ot custom lot s ubdivision.` on 4.75 acres of land in the Very Lo.'- Residential District, located on the east side of Hermosa, n6ith of Wilson Avenue - APN 201 - 111 -11. i D. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -09 - AMENDVIBITT - LD$ CHU', ,CH - The request to i mend the approved Conditional Use Permit allowing; the installation of four 35 foot high and two 50 foot P!gh light fixtures for the northerly softball and soccer fields boated at 6829 Etiwanda Avenue, north of Victoria Street - APrl 227 -6 -65 and 23. E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS? ENT kND TENTATIVIE TRACT 13275 - CLAYTON CROSSUNG LAN BEb E41, P11" II - The total development of 39.2 acres of land in the Medium- High Residential District (14 --24 - du/ac) into a three lot residential subdivision for the development of a 290 unit',, +nulti- family condominium complex, Phase II of the Master Plan of Development for 900+ condominium units, located on the north side of Highlend Avenue, 1203 feet east of Haven Avenue -APN 202- 271 -02, 0',. F. ,ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANI) PARCEL MAP 9646 - GOLDEN - A division of 4.97 acres of land into 4 parcels in 'the Very Low Residential District located at the northeast corner of Hillside Road and Moonstone Avenue - "APN 1061- 251 -02. Related File: Variance 86 -01. G. VARIANCE 86 -01 - GOLDEN - A request to reduce the minimum lot depth from 150 feet to 136 feet on a proposed .40,195 square foot parcel in the Very Low Residential District (up to 2 du/ac), located at the northeast corner of Hillside and Moonstone - APN 1061- 25 -94, Related Bile: Parcel Map 9646. 1 H. i REVISIONS OF THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN VI. New Business "1 I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT j REYIwvT 86 -0? - ARICAL - The development of two office !j buildings totaling 80,000 "r -quare feet on 4.�4 a -res of land in the industrial Park District (Subaraa 6) located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street - APN 209- i 41 -15. rP ME z J. ENt?IRQNYIENTAL ASSESSriIENfi AND DBVEL01'bENT „ - REY w 85 -09 I.EA oN" POM14 'Y ,SOCI�iTES ;- The - det�l Prreent of a iv halt, Pan for a 35 acre. lndus .c al Park - Anci the first phase eonsisting of two ligh }' �ustr Slbuild'ings totaling 63,474 square felt on 4,7 acres of land in the industrial Park District (Subarea 12)- located botwAen Milliken Avenue and Pittsburgh Avenue and between- 6i ; Street and 4th Street - APN 29261 =8; 59. Related Project: Parcel Map 9896 - Continued from June 11, 1986 meeting VIL Directoes_Reports K TRAILS VIII, Commission Business ,l IX. Public Comnents This is the time and place for the general public to add! ,Js the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those whiclido not already appear on this agenda. - X. Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time the shall y hat be heard only with the consent of the Carnmi lion. i i 1 i I I i JJ, I I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONR ,T 0 t --�- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOIJGA STAFF REPORT 0 U DATE: June 25, 1986 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Associate Planner SUBJECT: RESOLUTION OF DENIAL - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND 'TENTATIVE TRACT 1091 - SHELBOURNE - A total residential subdivision and design review of 49 single family lots on 8.9 acres of land in the Low Medium Resident,al District, located at the south side of Leman Avenue, 500 feet east of Archibald Avenue - APN 201 - 252 -21, 22. (Continued from May 28, 1986 Meeting.) I. BACKGROUND., On May 28, 1986, a Resolution of 'Denial was prep? -ed for the Punning Commission adoption per their direction baa•; ;,n the legal property owner's withdrawal of her authorization fc the applicant to process this project. At the ;egeest of the applicant, the Planning Commission, on May 28, 1986 continued this project to this regular meeting. The continuance was granted to allow time to resolve with the legal property owner the issue of authorization in processing this project. To date, staff has not received any, written documentation from the applicant showing that he has authority to proceed with this project. This item is under the Consent Calendar agenda for adoption of the Resolution of Denial. If the Planning Wrimission decides not to adopt the Resolution of Denial, this item has to be remov,�u from Consent Calendar for discussion. _ II. RECOMMENDATION: The Resolution of Denial without pr ^judice has been attached for your review. If the Commission decides not to adopt this resolution, this item must be removed from the Consent Calendar agenda for discussion. Staff would not recommend any further continuances of this item. Re fully ste'tomed, L _. --^--' Brad Buller City Planner BB:NF:ns Attachments: May 28, 1986 Planning Commission Staff Report R,?: lution of Denial ITEM A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA G�CA ya l STAFF REPORT t � cL O € V C � U DATE: May 28, 1986 I977 TO, Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Associate Planner SUBJECT: P.�SO!.UTIC:i OF DENIAL - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND NTATIVE,TRAC 99 - SHELBGURNE - A total residential subdivision and Design Review of 49 single family lots on 8.9 acres of land in the Law Medium Residential District. located at the south side of Lemon Avenue 500 feet east ofi Archibald - APN 201 - 252 -21, 22. f r (Continued from May 14, 1986 meeting.) I. BACKGROUND At the regular meeting of May 14, 1986, the Planning Commission was willing to grant another continuance to the applicant based on the fact that the applicant has progressed in developing plans and submitted for Technical Review Committee and Design Review Committee review. However, at this meeting, the attorney representing the legal property owners, Diane Holloway Harvey, and Constance Holloway Elliott, have submitted evidence k indicating that they have cancelled all rights of the applicant to buy the subject property and that there is no contract or any otiver relationship between them and the applicant and the applicant has no authority to continue processing any application on the subject property. Pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, authorization from the legal property owner is required to process any application for any proposed development on a subject property, therefore, the Planning Commission directed staff to prepare a Resolution of Deniel without prejudice to be adopted at this regular muting. Forther, the City Attorney was directed to review the property owner's letter. The applicant claims that they still have the right to process this tract map. The City Attorney has advised that the City should deny the map. II.. RECOMMENDATION: A Resolution of Denial without prejudice has been at;.ached for your review. If the Commission concurs with the findings, adopton of this Resolution will be in order. Denial without prejudice would permit a project to be refiled on this site. PLANNING commissIoN, STA,'F REPORT RESOLUTION 'OF dENI.AL - TT 12991 - SHEL13OURNE May 28 , 1986 Page 2 Re--e tf 11 1 tt-d ins Bra Buller City BB:NF:ko Attachments: Letter From Attorney gt!presenting the Legall-Property Owners May 14, 1986 Plannirg Commtssioa Staff- Report April §�' 1986 Planning Commlision Staff Report v March 26, 1986 Planning Conanission Staff Report December I1, 1985 Planning Commission Staff Report October 23, 1985 Planning Coamission Staff Report October 9, 1985 Planning Commission Staff Report Resolution of Denial ,I E 'j HILL, BETTS & NASH �! WOR5TZ:R. GEMMILL & FARMER) PrUeF'S510NAL CORPORATIONS - NEW TORK A PARTNERSNIP INCLUDING WASHINGTON T y, ONE WORLD IWADE CENTER SMITE I400 i8i8 N ST NW NEW TOA ORt N I 000 WILSHIRE BOULEVA D SUITE 7 ^- .. X. N v OOAB - -R ELTX 819.2000 - WA5NINGTON.I Z-O5a 16 TELiX Irrnzdzea iflS d23G>;Y.ES, C?l.LYFORNIA 90017 rEL_ttDa /asz•osae f213) d2(g•0281 TELEX; ITT4A0083 ~ •tELEX: IQ3071 ' FACSIMILE (013} 603.0p95 Ctrf May 14, 1986 AW►rinpvSI() �NGa RR MA ?' 6 1986 City of Rancho Cucamonga '�tg i. j Planning Department t 110ticf�t�2l�t5 S City Planner 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, Cal rornia 91701 Attention: Brad Dueller + Re: Tentative mract 4ML12991 Gentlemen: ` Wa, arel(thb,attorneys for the original owners of the above dascribed parcu..3_, -6f real property, Harry K. Holloway and his Estate, follow ;ng this degtli, ar16' for the present oikners thereof who are the distt tutees from his Estate, Dian Holloway Harvey, and Constance Holloway Elliott, As such attorneys vie represented the owners in their efforts to sell the property to Allen if. Parrin and his nominee, Shelburne Development Corpora- - c' tion. By reason of the persistent and continual defaults by said tuyers in the terms of the purchase escrow, the present owners have cancelled all rights o% said buyers to buy the property and there is now no contractual or other relationship Between the owne-•s and said buyers. This is to advise you that neither said Allen W. Parrin nor Shelburne Development Corporation has any authority to con- tinue with the project relating to the development of this property, or to process any application relating thereto. Yours ve trul , Robert. L. F rmer For HILL, BETTS & NASH RLF:smk cc: Ms. Dian; H. Harvey Ms. Constance 9. Elliott P, -y RE30LUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DENYING, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, A REQUEST FOR THE APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO, 12991, TO ALLOW A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION FOa NIRTY -NIVE SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 8.9 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF LEMON AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 500 FEET EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND MAKING FINDINCs IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. (i) SHELBOURNE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION has filed all application for the approval of a Tentative Tract Map, No. TT 12991, described above in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the tentative tract ". k�r i. (ii) On October 9, 1985, the Planning Commission of the City of t Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the subject matter of the tentative tract and, at the request of the applicant, said hearing was ! continued. Thereafter, on October 23, 1983 and December il, 1985, the Planning Commission again held public hearings cn the matter of the tract man t and, on each such date, tPle matter was continued at the request of the applicant. At Commission mission conclud d the heari g ote the g March subjectm matter of I the , � tentative tract and directed staff to prepare a Resolution of Denial for their review at � the April 9, 1986 regular Planning Commissio!i meeting under a consent calendar item. Thereafter, on April 9, 1986, the Planning Commission continued the matter to May 14, 1986 regular meeting at the request of the applicant. At ;. the regular meeting of May 14, 1986, this Commission, on the advice of the City staff, was willing to grant another, continuance to the applicant; however, on the date of said meeting, the present legal owners, Dian Holloway Harvey and Constance Holy qay Elliot, submitted evidence indicating that they have cancelled all r;ghts of the applicant to buy the subject property, and that there is no contractual or other relationship between them and the applicant and that the applicant has no authority to continue with the project relating to the development of this property or to process any application relating thereto. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred, B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. l� -S r Resolution No. TT 12991 - Shelbou,rne` "�� June 25, 198E =. Page 2 2. Based upon the findings and Conclusions set forth above, this 3 Commission hereby denies, without prejudice to refile and without additional fees, the tentative tract. 3. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shag certify to the adoption of this Resolution. r -, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF JUNE, 1986. PLANNING COMMISS�' N OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA e is BY. r Dennis L. Stout, Ch ratan ATTEST Brad Buller, Deputy ecretary 1, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City, of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, pasild, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, At a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of June, =iS35, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:- i I i li CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF RETORT Pate: 'June 17, lFBC- n'o: lfemi'ers of ti`e planning Ccrrdssion Frc+rr: Pill Palley, Ccxrarunity Services Pirecto �'�'/ n4: Jim Feneeetti, As Istant Park Planner �( C•uhject., Beryl Park - West Extension Conceptual plan n!to O Z U 1977 1 Arstract• The Eeryl Park - West Extension Conceptual 1,a%ster Plan (rxbibit "A"), is rein €; subuitted. key the Comiunity Eervices Department for review are comment. Packrrcurd P.uring the June 11, 1986, Planning Cormdssidon wedfing the reLbers of the FlarniPlr CcrMission expressed concern over the entrance /exit roadway to the proposed Eeryi Park - best Extersion. Pue to various constraining factors (such as: the Yetmpolitan Mater District's manhole location, the proposed Foothill rxPeway off rasp, no cr, str�qpt parking along Carnelian Street, and the existin6 intersection of Nighlare Avenue and Carnelian Street) only lirAtec revisions are possible. iSee Exhibit "F"). The proposed entrance /exit roadway has been expanded to 35' wJae. This will accommodate an additional exit lane, which thculd reduce the lsedicted congestion generated from youth sports.events. A deceleration lane has been added to the east side of Carnelian 4treet To aid in entering the park facility. Also along Carnelian. Street No Parking signs will be posted front Sunnerset Drive sout!, to the shopping center located on the North-East corner of lc tit Street and Carnelian Street intersection. The only effect of the revisions to the park will be a decrease of 3 parkins spaces. RecctrRendation: . 1. To review and romm.ent. or the corct- %-&;ual Beryl Park -17est Extension I%zter Plan, and; 2. To provide direction to the Director of Corm-unity Services to proceed to City Council . ITEM B uj Zi 4 § a r• �,1 e (_ jf _ P- LLD JILJ.35tfiS NYCI3NY�7 - . KWT- -rl)m OHIy i�Pfii I v ;pK1�1GY MAN9f'ot_� 1S. �w .p hl LLL 777 i r] lu a] j, DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: u + ++ va- A-31J11V .JU%atiLY1V1Xvt1 STAFF REPORT June 25, 1986 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Howard Fields, Assistant Planner TENTATIVE TRACT 12911 — LEON - Development of a seven (7) lot custom lot subdivision on 4.75 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District, located on the east side of Hermosa, north of Wilson Avenue - APN 201 - 111 -11. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Re uested: Approval of tentative tract map and issuance df a Negative Declaration. B. Project Density: 1.8 du /ac. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Existing egg ranch, Very Low Residential (less than 2 du /ac). South - Existing single - family resident, Very Low Residential (less than 2 du /ac), East Non- productive vineyard, Very Low Residential (less than 2 du /ac). West - Va -ant, Very Low Residential (less than 2 du /ac). D. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Very Low Residential (less than 2 du /ac). - North - Very Low Residential (less than 2 du /ac). South - Very Low Residential (less than 2 du /ac). East - Very Low Residential (less than 2 du /ac). West - Very Low Residential (less than 2 du /ac). E. Site Characteristics: Presently, the site is a vacant unproductive egg ranch that slopes from north to south at approximately 5 %. There are several dilapidated buildings and structures slated for removal, however, an existing residence on Lot 2 will remain. Three (3) major Eucalyptus windrows transverse the site along the north, south, and east property lines. The developer filed a Tree Removal Permit that indicates removal of 29 select Eucalyptus trees for reasons of street improvements and adequate wiCth in equestrian easement. The majority of windrows will reiaain intact. Those ITEM C �, � Y PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT. 12911 - LEON JUNE 25, 1986 PAGE 2 trees along the north property line will be trim„ed back to allow safe unobstructed access within the trail easement, also an S' high rock pile that runs along the east property line will be cleared and removed as part of trail improvements. II. ANALYSIS• A. General: The project is being developed as a custom -Plot subdivision with 7 lots averaging 22,500 square feet. This site design represents the optimal lot configuration given the parcel size, access control pcl:cy of JDO' and the existing residence on Lot 2. The project will take access off of Hermosa and eventually tie into properties to the east (see Exhibit "D"). The developer master planned the easterly abutting properties to demonstrate a feasible relationship to the project site. The project is being developed in accordance with the City's Subdivision Ordinance, Standards of Very Low Residential District and is consistent with the General Plan. Equestrian easements are provided in this tract with 15' wide easement to all lots. The Equestrian Advisory Committee reviewed and recommended approval of the proposed Iocal feeder trails. B. Technical Review Committee: The Committee reviewed and approved the project proposal subject to existing overhead utilities fronting the project along the east side of Hermosa be placed underground. further,' the Committee recommends that the applicant be eligible for a partial reimbursement upon development of property across the street. - III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The findings listed on the attached Resolutioi are supported by the following facts: A. The proposed subdivision, in conjunction with the Conditions of Approvals is consistent with the current development standards of the City. B. The project is adey;zote in size and shape to accommodate the proposed number of_lots within the subdivision. C. Adequate street and storm drain improvements Will ba provided to make the project compatible with the surrounding area and improve drainage in the vicinity. D. The project is consistent with the General Plan and conforms with the Development Standards of the "VL" District in which the site is located. Q -a . -A l F PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT 'L, F, TT 12911 - LEON. } JUNE 25, 1986 �. a; PAGE 3 r IV. ENVIRONMENTAL RUIEW: The `applicant compile{ 4 Part I of the Initial Study, Staff conducted a field `investigation and completed, Part 11 of "the Initial Study. No adverse mpacts upca the environment are anticipated' as a result. (if this project. Therefore: issuance of Negative Declaration ie, appropriate. IV. CORRESPONDENCE:: A notice of public hearing was published in The ails Reoort neo*paper and notices were sent to the surrounding `. property owners within a 300' radius o€ the project, site Also, public hearing notices were posted at and around the property. To date, no Correspondence has been received either for or against this project. ri V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution of Approval and issue a Negative Declaration. Res fully s ed -`, Bra uli r p City Planner BB :HW :ko :< Attachments: Letter from Tree Arborist j Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Map l Exhibit "C" - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit- "D" Conceptual Master Plan Exhibit "E" - Grading & Tree Removal Plan Exhibit "E1" Grading Sections Resolution with Conditions xo 4 ul� NORTH CITY OP. CUCAMONGA TITL.E- PLA,\,Ntt,\r, DIVEKy.,4 I. ,� �'7/j- � ,._;; •--. �.tpr tal tzonp.va•YL i '� � i r��. --.� � - --,. =:rte � _•` �� .,;�,�,•,; '`.�,�,,. �. _, ! ,� q ; a �. 'I zgt✓it�y� LOT is za o. yy l� . • .. �or.rw~ " �•' \- C3 df.5t. 191" w • ��wrw,°�'. .• •- :.er +.rta irnin.vtn.r.nwre rw.�, �- . `"".eCanre.urr.nre orw.�r. �_ ,• • II - i NCRTH CITY OF RANCID CUCAMt7NGA. mLF law. - L, PAIVNIN; DIVISION EXHtBt c: %a� �a ti? NURTH 1'Y QF rmrT uzz PLANeIPUNG DRrL.OLN EXHIBIT: •• :�G�CE: �_—, - >r . ti <; �I I�'ORT �i ,—iTY OF T11.��.�d` R..ANGD C UC'AMO ,GA 'VI�tIi\'G L}I�i1,,r�CXV E,XHII3TX': n SGA[.E= V. l SECTION A SECTION D 111 ^9 I Y �r• zr SECTION B i f.r r.n' CnONF � 5 _ \ srrt.� soar \ . .:.'.':.�.:,,, ='=� -- • a. E— SECTION a SECTION H 0TION .t stanoN K oE'r,tlt t •{ f • DETAIL 2 s/�" ^�' \•I I\URTH CITE' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. TrrrE PLAINNIm-, DivbgoN EXHIBrr. -. '` I` 14 , r Q7LdE12,�ELLE(� ;�, CONSULTING ARBORIST I.S.A. Certification No, 267 S June 1986 To Whom It May Concern: 1 have inspected the 29 E.icalyo ire ,lob dI r (blue gum) on TT12911. Hermosa Avenue, approximately 300 feet north of Wiisor. >', Rancho Cucamonga: The trees have been identified as desired to be removed by the designer of TT 129:1. My function as arborist is I'm evaluate the trees in terms of preservation potential, and to indicate whether or not it would be appropriate to remove them. The 20 trees along the south side of the property have not beet pruned. They show the "staghorn' effect of branch tip dieback in middle and upper crown areas. This is a characteristic of blue gum windbreak trees that have undergone water stress for a number of years. The height (30 to 60 feet or more), condition (poor ,,evidence of decline) , and form (numerous long lateral branches) all argue against the establishment and maiilei�snce of these trees in public or residential surroundings. Only 2 of the 20 present an appearanLe which bespeaks any realistic potential for -' preservation while assuring human safety. As the 20 trees are in the area to be excavated for a road, they would need to be removed if the design were to be approved. As nnly 2 are in condition to merit consideration, it may not be reasonable to consider design modification for their preservation. The 9 blue gums identified along the north property edge have been topped within the past i- 3 years. The end of the row encroaches on utility lines along Hermosa Av ^nue. The trees would require extensive, frequent and continuing maintenance to mitigate the very negative effects of the topping. At the intersection of Hermosa and-Wilson, only a few hundred feet from the trees an TT 12911, 1 observed 4 blue gums that show undeniable symptoms of having been killed by the Eucalyptus longhorn - borer (Phoracentha Samio m afa). Other blue gums in the area are dead, with the, brown leaves still attached: This is a further indication of borer activity. The dead trees can be considered to have been initially invaded by borers some 6 to 12 months ago. it is reasonable to infer that many of the living blue gums in the area are now becoming infested with borer larvae. In view of the proximity and abundance of the borer - Infested blue gums, and their preference for stressed trees, I have serious doubts that the majority of blue gums in this region will survive the combined stresses of water lack ( if left alone) or of construction stress (If a given site is developed). Because of the presence and nature of the Eucalyptus long horn barer, and the limited prospects for survival of the identified blue gums on TT 12911. it is my opinion that removal of these trees would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, V. Alden Kelley f RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION aF THE- VLANNiNG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF nANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12911 Ir WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12911 hereinafter "Map" submitted by Robert Beebensee, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cnunty of ;San Berr+ardino, State of California, described as development of 7 custom lot subdivision on 4.75 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District, located on the east side of Hermosa, north of Wilson Avenue - APN: 201- 111 -11 into 7 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on June 25, 1966; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Hap subject to all conditions set -forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reperts; and 1J !° WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineerin- and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the.public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 12911 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Cevelopment Code, and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is i consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific'plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (fj The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. w 7777 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION Tentative Tract 12911 Leon June 25, 1986 Page 2 (g) That 'this project will -�qot create adverse impacts on the environment and i� Negative Declaration is issued. SEC1`TON 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 12911, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard. Conditions: Planning Division: 1. The ! northerly Eucalyptus windrow shall be preservC4,;, Eucalyptus trees slated for removal shall be ;replaced on a ooe to one basis with Eucalyptus 'Ma culata (15 gallon). A landscape and tree replacement plan shall be submitted to the City Planner for review and approval prior to Final 14ap recordation. 2. Tree limbs within equestrian trails shall bi trimmed back to allow safe and clear access for riders ner Trails Development Standard 1001. 8. This map is being approved as a Custom Lot Subdivision only. Any future proposals for the development of five or more residential units shall require Design Review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits for any units. 4. All reference to building setback lines on the Final Map shall be emitted. Building setback lines for Tract 12911 shall be consistent with current Development Standards at the time of development. 5. Lot 1 shall only access to "A" Street.. _ 6. Lots 5 and 6 shall only access 11E3" Avenue. Engineerinq Division: 1. The Alta Lama Basins located to the south of the site shall be excavated to provide sufficient storm water retention to off -set the iY,.:rpased runoff generated by the development or an in -lieu ;ap paid to the City prior to recordation of the Final Map. 2. Overhead Utilities - Hermosa Avenue - All existing overhead electric lines and telecommunication lines from the first pole north of the northerly property line to the first pole south of the southerly property line shall be placed un�ergroaind prior to acceptance of jublic improvements. The applicant shall be eligible for a partial reimbursement per Resolution No 86 -77. C_— X01, 4 PLANNING COMMISSION, -ABSOLUTION Tentative Tract 12911 = Lean June 25, 1986 Page 3 APPROVED. AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF JUNE, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY' Dennis Stout, L. Stout, Chairman 9 ATTEST: Bra Buller, Cepufy Secre ary i I, Brad Bugler, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Ranchc Cucam"jiga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was auly kind .r regularly i0xoc)uced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the 1 City of Rane,p Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held r^ , on the 25th day of June, 1986, by the following vote -to -wit: M r AYES: COMMISSIONERS: s M NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: t: N tt Z ++ u i a 0 L Cl. 10 11 �J `J t N Y N t.YG ��• .YC� .YS °w'a° CD �c��� Nva.. Lo,s °LOA La Ci d«.N V.� N dYY- q q pV Gtl uG Y a.0 S G° pAy L.G. nO 09€ DN E'T KQ OO.EL 6C _ a .�A .�r e�� mC.r2yG ... n mo �+.va. x,• ww r Ate: GE ,,GG O L E 9 C 12 U t 0 U H L ^ C yp U R U U yr ct.o q`nUO "N 1; E �� o � x Y.. L n. u �.2• � . Y t �Y o a c "-.o v o 12 �6Atl 4 tOa• onG.�- - .2-a CN,NY VAC,. ave.N A3 A E •t CL Va O p tl Y r'. A C YU n W ^ L N €€ �O Ut TO aT N ^�Vr -� Y�� O•r.Y �. .��.E °K yc^ �b EG G Y u +YU GN,p G aY.•"E'YLYV p' Lm x ..}-1 SyL �'• --OY ^ CUw� YU � n- t o E d4 U4. y F.LU5 L r YT 6� A LaY ML AS'� I -DC.GN atD] 6Lr Y+=+S GO.ao mtl O° lnµ L� m V 2 S W a N ti d D W � � N < J c�'oo " Eon . �+r+NGd n Avoe G vu aN W C Or UC G L C.0 Y iG Y Y y O L a L x U u .^ -uyyu o Y Y A O ur �ti Vp D O�+�N ALaO A u Ny AL uY V bna ac ua~ n o=aa n E E N qr�k O 01 Yn4�U •+ca.Yc A NL a°•� n > H C Iu v • O. U N q tl 6 m u e', ^ ti J LL a, A p t N O G y a e ^p M Z a v^Ai YZ U H O J V'•a �i. _ G PE, Y A U p.' f Y U N O V C O O r TU E A A G y 0 0 6 U V 6 n n N C u h r <•p.• tg 4 u j r F 4 57 c�'oo " Eon . �+r+NGd n Avoe G vu aN W C Or UC G L C.0 Y iG Y Y y O L a L x U u .^ -uyyu o Y Y A O ur �ti Vp D O�+�N ALaO A u Ny AL uY V bna ac ua~ n o=aa n E E N qr�k O 01 Yn4�U •+ca.Yc A NL a°•� 4J U Q: .O L R �.osg ua >, d. a'. xyu.h .yaa �rom.o vd agv w bit— a HaYp Bo:jN wt' Y wu pO, LV yyEE O C06w D Qw V'J .'J Rw ro to_ 7O� NLdr g0, 4 VGY LQY b.. ®P G.2 1. LL6 N•q.`� w0.r.. ^' 'J ^V 0. 0. OHA'Jr >.0 COw O Ou.�L N CZ� 1.va NN L �'tzb �� uQ N� u ..l � l L .+ w qp, O U .p• q C. d r. ° p G w Y Y N y@ L 5�w0. dVN pp N1 C C .q $ a �. F .. w 0 m m r w 4 L V L till,4. V C ` C N Y O Y L V r� c w.�+.r•- LLma QL mqE� CC .0 Nha pYN •N., LAC �q °' ° l 4 M q6 O. E.N aLtny ° OI VW^ C Ng N d one CE C C r g. a� _ w. b ++LV 4 PE N Opp,, 4 A a Cm=tT b V EE > d V..CYgV'O.ai. >+OVN 3 OVV VY LCy EV 4 mYL.U9 aai4 w q`�aYau.°. S.Q Eu VG ^.q >>'.•� r C: L NV V.5 1p « Wr w A 4iLlLA p y N66 V •y qL.b r�Uw L ub Wa ^d p V p7e N C L6 d O Y Oq�L Lr°.eL oL LL.P Or N U. =•„ Off` m T't N a YN row 6u L .�. �LV.t °AS O CCyµr 1. up �>t vNq��. +.'N � N w w • q G L a V L G a q w 0 Y m u V k N A y � Y C N Q 9 g N N d �+ .d• V qpN g y yu '^,C NZ y� C aOJ p L j'7^ a°s, w w> Y N °L �•C.wO �V 'pR N� NWi .N 60bu �Ni J��NL appNa Va�OL. t LCp� u •' CV !: V b! `y N r N ,Gr +. yw C.. Y, we ._. C C ro= NN •uL. LY O. p� � NC ww C C6� l Ai0. 06 V wG Y V .,...�YL L° ... LE4y Y V�YF 4Or'L � ♦dLN - A _LG L.r va.S wiq a4 >� •L•2Ga 'nw �> Ycr3�C'O'I�V UL • NFVOaC LQ� �.N ran VNL r O' -.g �`OQpq N.O ll pr L ba .n c ro'e >opw b'ta�oo "uL+- C La n ��u N L Nu ••-> a n °- o ° °"'. u caw cm.r cbA 0.L en�yb L _a�u �� aTLw OC> >.-rdu .L a� N Q.'^a+y'CC >ro ruC.M i�4. MVCLT Vd_.L.N 'BE .'. aLn L.� O Li)"Gp gC.Ow Nd= 9VNL G3C Z" hLLt O.aN E V ^V4? wr pFQ 4L M0..CC c a D O d^ N NYCC O CN NU U..`+ «.•°.... C L SM W.� .NNY O ^a v�roaw rQNN v l�L.y NYV °w • LOt V bN bi�~N yid VC°a IVe CGµq g $ Vi V • b WYU.�F ^Y. y. COI °N CG W'4yv ~L0.'•• r yro L oN.NQ•i +Z � dYa - d ' E j V L .0 .Q V �o L C Q Y V t C C. t° L w O& G7 twY C° YN s C�C r v CC QOY e 6E f4 y •� C l O U 9i E : b y Y N i La L +a 0. p d V w ^V V iltY> O > L O VV Vc ° Y 4 6 , N6 Y .O ..1 N C u p �I ^I of a pl � y •� I MI �� 14 Ll 11 Loa v ^a sai ono `o ,o o� °iT Q` We r.Ngq« e.e ct �. E> 'V 6 4 4 Nd° a H N b e ro O° b U Q ct, A" R, i• P w� r W 6 LL Ol W r 60�q t !I '� Y g G L ba E E'R L °q^ �°n6 c N Ln dal �9 �YdN du � °N Wb Y� y0 �" •C e wYOp Wy°j.�NNT �y..00L tr• L A w o C11J UQda^ .. oa_iNq '� I• = N9 L ad YpgY q..Nd OV O G O V � MT.gN TgggORRR °� qw ^Y ~N. W� Cg2ddy V � d 4 C C��c O.l N� o =4. ° ° W W p.At. mN- Y cby m e�w« ° do ccynu `oa P 6 iO� VW pP�OYa .p q ti �O N L d'^ L w o rnEg :0; Y g y 0 q W c ✓i V �n i.••- du co w0 adiGN awi -oa utn N iro c •� q 4yNP wo d,^dd ,ao G WCdC _CwV` ^ w19rN O� ✓�� �O % WLbOY66N >.b >9 Ol`q� 6N Y qVC -. L °Wq q 6yN 5 _ CqN ^^OCC —a E2 Aw. uNYY jC p 4 d0 0 -0 - L q dt b '• a y°•r n �N ro 4 NO •K error > .b awL ¢N oatW FONS•q p°' °Fa° cu °>, �o a W" P: b. -CO N WOpwN «w°. c E E W wWw Y n Vt N.r r W cn N C E S'+i °. .r q qq Yl NroN Q N^ 4' h r.,;; O � N L c6q rn K N V^ .� i � .v'N 6 D .0 q+ O 6 �C V i. tL O w &Z Loa v ^a ay. Yd D z Y Wno� cep CNb �w TLLa .Na V wGC L ^dM d NO.0 C .aC� G 'r ic^°qn' E°w b6�W Nc NO N c C n T WGG N F W 6 LL ba 6G� C= Lm L O Z b � °q^ �°n6 c N Ln dal �9 H« w � O L°d y w� ww N wd Nom« q A +� t -aC LU .^ K N q=__ A adaC •• -baTl~ TON cro•L.r. _ qq d = N9 __= ^ °N N i 0 wg7y Ld6d d� Oy _ L °ltL bL� d °dlcc Ww N AY �� ^� 9 ' ii qw ^Y - °� wbN rou« 4 C C��c O.l «L6 o =4. ° ° W W p.At. mN- Y cby m e�w« ° do ccynu d a ps ma ^To du zu .��• •� q ugac wo d,^dd ,ao G WCdC 9 va Ay c�ro o.'r dt br G,a NL qo uo W d R N °V•E S. 6N W _ wZ wLL ym .-,pYw N O Nm �w aNwW jC ..wN.T+ 4 d0 0 7 C `rN Cr, wT�C.c 4 NO •K error > .b 4b N. N n Hn Kt/ KO FONS•q �jy QN bw WOpwN «w°. N Ell v.a °s'uy urn E .dsLO yT4 � ter. yWVt yC YG "C $NY uyp 9y... Cly .�G B�S@ wu�4T9 .V• YC ��6 • Tx uy. «En yCY F� OY g4yy1 L Y9 v� T •t T � N � WY Y yr= CE wpb Pv QCp GS Lb ytyV �C� �' pVC •ill y < ..,,JJ .".'^p4 wt - +�-? �• > ,�a�i 41 0 N... Yg4 uga a°aSS.T,.6 O tW.� y =q.� YN N` 4 «r Ot d �.° L6T ��aCC a° w. `a °.Y UE 4 a.CL � f °� E autiu yamE 4q�m o�eY C ^a a o `�Y y�0 yN LLw C V C C O' gOYy L O sUyY 1`I «YM y ^C �V U .a-. L '�N "'. �.,L -L w� ^�� N�.,SGt' `S ^•' C.�L W �Tt uq a0y .SC ° ?C9 C �? .^. e o d'`^ 6«.ti6 O Y •« W 1�:. yM «H ^tyy'O u 1t0 O O,y9yA .py r� ^ OI •Yw It zz yy ,., u4 ° s% a••.ubLU L u ..a w o •-� o� m u�vN away ^ v g.N RO 0 °a^ OS D M y 4n YyLn P G C Q0 NTOY L q N V�VW M •as^ L° L E L y V > •' + O A hL" G it a L tL N p Hat y N SD !•) O Y N. � of 14 �! N P • 90+4 0'S b 2 V CAL uu q4y r92 x ix v4 .dNq ^Y O: S, ,ri N ^V DNA -,e: N.L ♦'q+ A �G lJ. 2�L q�s ,p i a/ V •+ y A ua U NC No ka% gt ^., Cy W y a b Y y - A daC� C 6 V V O gg Y at 9 p ^.0 Oq 'L u0 LCV H N LNw T4 oy Cd '. T au yp aq bgC� � _t C �•^„� �... ZJ� HmLV �uca s4 ^dn wu y °Y� o.. y-<J Lva dN u`..u4u a �N:! Y.°- .uc yN ^e om o. ornn aria QT- 4d.0 w c a L iybE aR> C 6r ` ro C� CN Z $O' a "c,o� �Y .°vqu Maw io p wr6i Duo^ • ca n'S .°.' -'eL° ^ o.E a •- «ua .^r- mr° a :✓�^^sR� o' C.o �i0y« 4. LU OL .°SL.c n ^NycN ^ 4U.: ° V MN q Tw O� C CSY.� _C C N L ^y ' €0... NQ� 3NC 06 N_ L.JL N^ ^VL •Mw20 �uM W L9y° C u ^O1 ai0>r« L ^ yYl`. E NnO °.y CCU y6N j.aw. dPG d u. Cyy rp W_ o 4u0{�gn' FNa VY C NN C 30`^ YLE� < L >C haws ..nm OVVyi� C WW gOqtt1 W�2 O.YMY a s O q O° O1J t ^O1 e�p,o V.e.VC+ g I p n L O >j T Se O1 � a •,� k�. C m` n is y„L, r•n00 ` A^ Ey`. o t o G �.. u` .0 �aO 'Py t,°.'^".,• L d Ny °.c EV aLin •�.. V a 8.. 4 �f ,`pFd GM r- '� E E } -gtc a Eny� Cn V O N a V> 1 C Nd `u NWE E -4 L X10.° =r nN O.N C V n yUf d y n. R.E. O.q ^ = V y 6 N70 My r f 270 N ^VOVC Y C°N °E G •• L�YJC OL C _NYO L . v 3 2 199..a a �w A A y6 O` V °Iil CW N N L \A nl P Ka Vy G 6i 6 b 4 Vw I AIIL �I J `C 9L' � u y qF •'•P1`OF a C u N NN 7N. 6 C� C N N O`� d OILVL �4. 2Y y�CY zl cy�y �CNY Y Cam. = +tluC 9 7Z k T° n"' � tr L c•` ^ uW A a V ua � 6 Ak S 90N W t� 6P W V A Cyµ �V W �T °y Cr- G yd 6 LdL Y A� `G6.6•ydnYOu _` Ny �u aUCY A6. Un y aAnnOt by O'V O1��y..C. d }�. M N^ C Y. ^ O b N C d y C O dyy:L A .0 .° a ^•' �• ? 3 --SR, aV� N� eE pn .a 2t �. u F. >�a a.�� "C na'�•.O- O Y aY Aq cy cY c �u0i N°nd' LN .EuM A +qu EP °d ° .~"ro V ESdN. �lV9NT ou N Gpp Ba> !N Q O. M- O N L. • I U n t� � a 2 ! Y ! Q. ! I t S_ Q C A •. i! f ��f i 141 11 _ uoo « u U •" 4:a L t•W � a TU 9N v m Aw m v « uY aw ot" L 6 S V E d 0 e N Ay- []may as ° O U O P O L E w« c.a m9 E a u o, q ^ i Ew g« d 2 E rA CN G y Lam-« v ww z m �N ^+«-c u cv°oa°Nt Ern cT 4w Q,SL W.3 ° Uc.TJ NC QL. t�r- • I �I I N �'a m yLE 6Aw« � U .aya dL A« Apt « Cd s 3 q L «OM i u c Ny>LA ,ce. N 9 L• O� � 60 -o L N E «.EM1A b9 CU M.A J qd L ¢ LQ y «q ~ T ^ U ... €• is C « U g AN E qcL C q ba E N�L> qL CJi E W LE AP VN FAO � Q Nq A Ot o' T L F °EGAG nEy> A_cLN y ^L ^ O CNd L Ct' a E natEa ��O W r ECEL 4N TdC WC L r� L � UA01°+GL I ' u yY-NT< E uNV w V CLL = uC ` 2 N v > T w n �;N6Wq^ QpryM n0«� NA bYUr 6U G.� WrNLiU _ uoo « u U •" 4:a L t•W � a TU 9N v m Aw m v « uY aw ot" L 6 S V E d 0 e N Ay- as ° ;y E w« c.a m9 E a u o, q ^ i Ew g« d 2 E rA CN G y Lam-« v ww z m �N ^+«-c u cv°oa°Nt Ern cT 4w Q,SL W.3 ° Uc.TJ NC QL. t�r- • I �I I N 'n^2 d w « o C > vq a N nq .«•. A u zysT W E m 9 6C a n *• " E Dti Gy C 0 « co 9 t y>j p 6 C a °f � N 6 A � V I IU ', I 1 a d E O 4. dti uY .+ d u O.q 6G a ArnAu GCNA 1 4 �y da Yom. AzA« dL to. o sA- La ~a 6�3 X90 6 3 Pa CCK 64Cb 3 O 64 G L. 'ON «� C O: 4f3-- 4 n°.r Ob c caT 4. da A V lub C � z O .• �C •. G o cN L bu ^M 2uCT y m Ex :xa°i Yu S* ^U M x x •y r uW Va AE `M OL '� AG'L r n N ° Am d� y «b.p 01 6C aY dO�`C N L eo p 'c° � sFd b 5 �a no w LL ON6 •' °SAO c v u o CY O � N�.' b `moo n0 IYb LLpO. 'E u u z W t fS1W �Y V UA O apY � acw 4 3 d 1 x, F, NE — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ,moo c�}c"hr °n,�9 0 O Z C; ? DATE: June 25, 19$6 1977, I Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FRDM: Brad, Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -09 AMENDMENT - CHURCH OF LATTER DAY SAINTS - The request to amend the approved Conditional Use Permit allowing the installation of four 35 -foot high and two 50 -foot high light fixtures for the northerly softball- and soccer fields, located at 6829 Etiwanda Avenue, north of Victoria Street - APN': 227.06 -65 and 23. I. ABSTRACT: The applicant is proposing to extend the use of the previously approved recreation fields into night time with the installation ^f 6 light poles /fixtures to light up the northerly softball and soccer fields. The purpose of this report is for the Planning Commission to review and consider such extension of use; to determine whether the Facts for Findings, can be made for supporting the approval of night time use of the recreation fields, and if so, to determine the mitigation measures needed for reducing the environmental impact. II. BACKGROUND: On August "2, 1984, the Planning Commission conditionally approved CUP 84 -09 for a church facility, two recreational fields and a storage facility as shown in Exnibit "B ". Currently, the church -any storage facility are under construction while-the two recreational fields (two softball fields_ and 1 soccer field) are being graded. One of the Conditions of Approval require that any improvements -jithin the recreational fields such as installation of lights require a separate review and approval from the Planning Commission. The applicant proposes installation of four 35 -foot high and two 50 -foot high light standards. III. ANALYSIS: - -A. General: The proposed six light fixtures for the northeriy softball and soccer fields are at the locations shown on Exhibit "C" The southerly softball field will not be lighted. The recreational fields will be used for church programs only, and will not be leased or rented out to ?,,Iy outside organization or the general pubiic. The softball field will be lighted (all six lights) two times a week on Thursday ITEM D ' PLANNINGCOMMISSION S STAFF REPORT ' ^«' - Church of Latter Day Saints ' 'June � __- . .' ' ^ ` ` Wjob, .� .�' a and Friday night games during the softball season, which is . . , ' ' 's - ---September to November. � program will � place � / avd 1 them - � these li - 1 have r i lights being used an the field under the above conditions and a ^ ~ ~-, ~^~"'., where they are .ovu*=. � � The site for ' ' one soccer field) is surrounded on the north side, east and the south side ' ' ."" . - as E Eu�alypt-.-s - gallon — size at -`~-^ on center) are being provided on the north side, east side, and the south ,;ide I MW hm,;,iCNG COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CHIP 84- 09- Amendment: - Church of Latter Day Saints June 25, 1986 Page 3 1. Light and Glare: The lighted fields at two nights a weef� between the months of April and November (except August) could create light ar.d glare that have potential adverse impacts on surrounding residences especially to the east and the north side. Curren Development Code pol;.,,y states that all lights shall be designed to project ,light downward and shall not create illumination which exceed 5 foot candles on adjacent properties. According tc the applicant, the proposed lights that they will be installing have protective lamp shields that restrict the spread of the light beam. The amount of spill over when they are lit up is less than 1 foot candle. Exhibit "F" shows the spill over area into the adjacent properties. Staff has contacted the Community Services Department for additional information regarding height of light poles for softball field. The Community Services Department ;.tated that the taller the light pole, the less .flare' for adjacent properties since the fake of the . lights would b pointing downward to light up the desired area. The shorter the light pole, the more glare for adjacent properties as the face of the fights would have to be tilted at an angle for lighting up the desired area. The height of the light pales will be using in City's Community Park are up to 80 -feet high. However, these poles would not be placed adjacert to any residences since the size of a Community',?ark could range from 20 acres to 100 acres. Th^ Community Services Department recommended" that 'a report prepared by a licensed electrical engineer be required from the applicant to determine and certify th^ amount of spill over for compliance with the City Coau of 5 foot candles maximum. 2. Noise: According to the applicant, any sport on Thursday and Friday nights will end at 10:00 p.m. Also, approximately 10 to 15 spectators may be present at those 2 night games. At play -off games, there may be as many as 75 spectators to watch the fames during the month of July. Information regarding the amount of increase in noise level during the play -off games has not been provided by the applicant. The normally acceptable outdoor noise level is 60 decibles, according to the City's General Plan. It takes an increase of 5 decibles for any noticable change in sound, while an increase in 10 decibles would mean doubling loudness and will have adverse impacts. Therefore, the number of spectators at play -off games could generate an unacceptable I b -3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 84 -09 Amennment - Church of Latter Day Saints June 25 1986 Page 4 raise level that might impact the surrounding residents.. Some of the impacts could be annoyance, nuisance, dissatisfaction, and int^rference with speech and sleep. 3. Aesthetics: The location of the church facility Partially shields some of the light poles from public view from Etiwanda Avenue. These six poles are very visible from the single - family residences on the north and east side However, existing along 'the west property boundary of the east side residences are five 50 -foot high Edison poles as shown in Exhibit "C ". 4. Compatibilit• to Residential Area: The height of the sI x light poles ranging from 3 -feet to 50 -feet high may not be compatible to residential development. D. Mitigation Measures. reviewing this Conditional Use Permit Amendmeat to allow, the installation o�11 light poles, the Planning Cormi-ission could consider the following mitigation measures to reduce or eliminate any environmental impacts to the surrounding residents: 1. Reduce the height of all the 11!gi,t holes. This would provide compatability to the surrounding residential building height. However, shorter light poles may increase the amount of glare to surrotinding properties. 2. Reduce the number of sports programs play�etl at night er week as well as the e[L time. this would reduce the times and the oration of any - environmental impact to the surrounding properties. 3. Restrict the use of the lighted softball field only during the softball and soccer seasons such as from the month of Agra to uly, an from September to November, respectively. This would reduce the number of times those sports programs could affect the surrounding properties. 4. Require a report prepared by a licensed electrical engineer to certify the amount of spill over is less than 1 foot candle. 5. Limit t'e number of spectators allowed during sport programs. This would reduce the potential of unacceptable noise levels. However, this would be difficult to monitor and controi. D -y y JA PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 84 -09 Amendment - Church of Latter Day Saints June 25, 1986 Page 5 A IV. FACTS FOR FI61NGS: In considering the proposed amendment to the Conditional Use Permit, the Planning Commission must make the r- following findings: A. That the proposed installation of the fixed light poles ranging .. from a height of 35 to 50 -feet is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the_Etiwanda Specific Plan, and the purpose of the district in which the site is located. B. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto,,,- will not be detrimental to public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity. C. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable rr: provisions of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. ` V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Daiiy Report newspaper, property posted, and notices "were sent to the property " owners within 300 feet of the project site. VI. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission consider all input and public testimony regarding this project and determine whether the Facts for Findings can be made to support approval of the amendment to the Conditional' Use Permit or make determination as to the mitigation measures needed for reducing the environmental impact. If the Planning Commission can support the Facts for Findings, staff should be directed to prepare a 14' Resolution of Approval with Conditions for your review at the k following regular Planning Commission meeting. If the Planning Commission cannot support the Facts for Findings, then staff should_ be directed to draft a Resolution of Denial for adoption at the next meeting. fully su ed, 41e ler City Planner BB :NF:cv y JA PLANNINti,tommT- Ssmbt1 STAFF REPUIT CUP 84-09' Amendment Church Latter Day Saints x - of June Za, 1986 Page 6 attachments: o Applicant's Letter of Proposal - ~ o trap Sowing Surroundina Residents who are "For " or - " "Against "'the Project o Signatures Surrounding "Objection of Residents with no to the Installation of the Light Poles. Exhibit "All - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Approved Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "C " - Detailed Ballfield Pian ' Exhibit „D" - Typical Beam Spread ' Exhibit "E" - Light Beam Spread for the Two Fields Exhibit "F" - Area of Light Spill Over Exhibit "G" - North Perspective View Exhibit "'H" - Photos of Proposed Lights Design. P1- `r I IRIS I \IM I S I IPLAHO CAI-IFOPI 11A STAKE June 18, 1986 RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNIM DEPT. With the very heavy demand upon the few city parks and ballfields, we �,. have found it c almost impossible to schedule city facilities to run our church sports programs for our almost 5;000 members:.in,tbi - w.area. As a result of this, we acquired an additional 4 acres at our Etiwanda Church site for 2 softball fields and a soccer field. We are currently under const,:uution of the ball fields and we have determined by lighting just the north softball fie. hat we could meet the needs of our whole sporrs-program and also we we ;d relieve the heavy demand on the city facilities by totally taking care of our own needs by just lighting one field, thus eliminating any need for us to use city facilities for our softball or soccer programs. We have worked with the Planning Dept. and Park S Recy. -,ion Dept. and our engineer to design the ballfield and light in a manor to meet our needs and with as little inconvience to our neighbors as possible- We are therefore requesting we be permitted to -.ight the one field as follows: 1. North softball field be relocated from the east side of recreational land to the west side of the recreational land, thus puttinj, 3 of the 6 lightpoles in the middle of the church property - 1 -5J' pole and 2 -35' poles, 2 -35' poles would then go on the north property 1 and only one 50' pole would go on the east property line, thus minimizing as much as possible the light to adjacent properties.- 2. The city required eucalyptus wind row around the entire church site will also help to minimize the lights when in use. 3. The 6' to 8' high block required by the city is now in place around the entire church site as futher insurance to our neighbors pr:.;acy as much as iossible. , 4. Light patterns have been engineered and dssigned to have less than 5% spill over to adjacent property. 5. Light will be used for church programs only. 6. Ball fields are for church use only and ca.not be leased or rented,. 7. No sports programs will be permitted on Sundays. 8. Lights will not be used more than an average of twice a week for 8 months of the year. 9. Light will not be on after 10 :00 p.m. The Parks and Recreation Dept, of the city has been of great assistance in helping us to determine the type of light that would be in harmony with those the city is installing in their parks and would lso with stand the high winds in the area. 3 UPLAND M...3ntilASTAKE L.I1.S Balifields, Contd. Due to the sunken field none of the light poles should extend higher 14 than the existing edison poles on the east prop(orty line, a_ The normal church athletic programs are scheduled to take place on -- Thursday Evenings and Saturdays, starting with soccer in September to the end of November. Basketball) from November to March in our cultural hall located inside the church building. Softball starting in April Co Jude with playoffs the first 3 weeks in July on Thursday and Friday nights and Saturdays. There are no sports programs in August. avid W ,,,/LLong p' ! PhysicalVacilities Rep. t Upland, Calif. Stake 3 '1 N N i Na ti H N k —@ h h a K v { \ p V 1 a o h i Na ti H LI hX6•J i Iso -Z "I ,I At d x ®3, K u°� N k —@ h h a K { \ p V LI hX6•J i Iso -Z "I ,I At d x ®3, K u°� N k —@ h h a K 1 a vl- s � , � 4{ to 0 N 1® oLL'' 7 di 7 y OEM,- d 564 r W ur- t I THE CHURCH of JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER —DAY SAINTS C�Vplo�-Of A UPLAND CALIFORNIA STAKE R4NCIIO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DEPT. JUNE 18, 1986 I understand that the L.D.S. Church would like to put lights on the north softball field as diagramed on the reverse side of this letter with 6 light poles at 6829 Etiwanda Ave. as follows: 1. 1 - 50' high pole with 4 lights on east pl. 85' south of Los Cedros Ave. L - 35' high pole with 4 lights on north i,l. 150' W. of East pl. 1 - 35' high pole with 2 lights on north .)1. 285' W. of East p1. 1 - 35' high pole with 2 lights on east side of parking lot 45' south on N. pl. 1 - 35' high pole with 4 lights on east side of parking lot 180' south of N. pl. 1 - 50' high pole with 4 lights on east side of parking lot 320' south of N. pl. • l light patterns have been engineered with less than 5 spill over onto any adjacent property. 3. Lights will not be used more than an average of 2 times a week for months of the year or after 10:00 p.m. 4. Lights are for church programs only. 5. No sport programs will take place on Sunday. 6. That a eucalyptus wind row will serve . an additional buffer for light. I HAVE NO OL ECTIONS TO THE LIGHTS BEING PUT IN UNDER THESE CONDITIONS: r `%W SECAN, Mae L., 6893 Etiwanda Ave. _� /,.G•LQ ��? r!. r-,. 2. GIAMBRA, Angelo & Lynne, 6768 Etiwanda Ave. 3. MATHIS, Wesley Cora, 6795 Etiwanda Ave. PIMENTAL, cha d & Trene 6781 Etiwanda Ave. `._p -� 1t l,% rF, #ar""e�Ftce $WI Wa Rd._ :embra 6. WILLIi,I LION CO., 6768 Etiwanda Ave. 7. CLARK, James I Phillys, 6768 Etiwanda Ave. Ni MAYPIELD, William & Ellen, 6838 Etiwanda Ave. t E, Richard & Mary, P. 0. Box 743, Cucamon GEARHART, Patricia, P. O. Box 743 Cucamonga DITTMAN, Albert & Betty, 6878 Etiwanda Ave./ .; •. ' t:, -r.... 12. VAN DORT, Elizabeth, 6892 Etiw Ave.. ROSEB2RRY, 6898 Etiwanda Ave. 14. PEDERSON, Bobbi L., 6711 Etiwa da I Br CAREY, Alton & Sharon, 13004 Los C os Ave. 2. GRISSOM, Michael &Wendy, 13018 Los Cedros Ave. 3. CLARK, James & Arlene, 13005 Los Cedros 4. PODOLSKY, George & Edythe, 13017 Los Cedros Ave. 5. HARPER, Gary & Diana, 13031 Las Cedros Ave. 6. BERZIN, Harvey & Patricia, 13043 Los Cedros Ave. 7. WALKER, Douglas & Cynthia, 13055 Los Cedros Ave. Gl� I McDONA Gar & 13006 Larrera Ave.' _aux� 13018 Larrera Ave,. 3. GINTHER, Jeseph & Rosemary, 13030 Larrera Ave. _ 4.�,,+ LOTZ, Rich,,rd & Julie, 13042 Larrera Ave. \\ li; WENDELIN, Wayne i& Bonnie, 13005 Larrera Ave, l,,)y 6.,je McANICH, :evin & Rebecca, 13017 Larrera Ave. - -� SOLARIO, Gabriel & Cecelia, 13031 Larrera 8. ELVIS & LARENA, 13043 Larrera Ave. _ 91 e lu Ir ,J THE CHURCH 'OF JESUS CHRIST of LATTER —DAY SAINTS UPLAND CALIFORNIA STAKE RANC110 CUC.L*IONGA PLANNING DEPT. JUNE 18, 1986 understand that the L.D.S. Church would like <e put lights on the north softball field ns diagramed on the reverse side of this letter with 6 light poles at 6829 Etiwanda Ave. as follows: 1. 1 - 50' high pole with 4 lights on east pl. 85' south of Los Cedroz Ave. 1 - 35' high pole w,th 4 lights on north p1. 150' W. of East pl. 1 - 35' high pole with 2 lights on nortn pl. 2851 W. of East pi. 1 - 35' high pole with 2 lights on ,east side of parking lot 45' south on N. pl. I - 35' high pole with 4 lights on east sidt., of parking'lot 180' south of N. pl. 1 -- 50' high pole with 4 lights on east side of parking lot 320' south of N. pi. 2. All light patterns lave been engineered with less than 5% spill over onto any adjacent property. 3. Lights will not be used more than an average of 2 times a week for 8 months of the yeat or after 10:00 p.m. 4. .,ights are for church programs only. 5. No snort programs will take place on Sunday. 6. That a eucalyptus wind row will serve as an additional buffer for light. I HAVE NO OBJECTIONS TO THE LIGHTS BEING PUT IN UNDER THESE CONDITIONS, tl/HESSLER, Gerald W. & Wendy, 12920 Victoria ETIWANDA CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH, p. 0. Box 37 FROST, Marcella R. P. 0. Box 73 `en #,m !I SMITH, Robert & Terry 12911. Victoria 5. FORT, Jeffrey & Joanne, 12982 Victoria_ — 6. FROST, James & Gwyn, 12996 Victoria ?,el".HERNANDEZ, ETI14ANDA WATER CO. P. 0. Box 726, cu SHEPHARD, Minnie, P. 0. Box 2? `_ -if John & Esther, 130307 Victoria- 1910. HARRIS, Ronald & Linda, 13044 Victoria D -11 ,: i 7 CITY Or RANCHO Ct;C r 'vIojNGt1 PLANNING DRVISIO ,$) ITEM. C/, -47 �L�Q EXHIBIT- _ ���� SCALE: _ 'G NORTH 11 11 F tii'Ju U L--- NORTH CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Tnu.~ � LALNNkG DRMaN EXHIBFP--J!� w .. 1C f f •1 v 1, Tp3C:AR�i'1 / ; i lJW/ Fly I �� � CFA • � �• I � -- k,.sw /rem. i Xz ti 111 .c � • 1 rr g'y I ;. < G NORTH �J!/yLry�� fir! / �. � • I • - - SG/t/NL � to K PJ< . _ �"" � •' • { • � ; • '�«,JO� a �,n * � - .G,,,< 1� • : � � n t( .gin _ , _. I • Ji Vim\ ` `1 � '� <• 1 I �;, r� ) • ''T i �` Jy y CITY OF � 7 RANCHO CLUMMONGA TITLE = .LM t F� PLANleiil\•G DI SIQN E7 HWrr =—,,—Sflk E: L •Ingmalnl p.NUtl Voltage Inset }vngle d+qd lordCSeed votlage Sec Voltage fable. $nlyd lme —Hb AIndK.11nt NEMAbelrirtyrie Insert Smgie digit for desired Woe. Sde AVadabrbly table [Cited line — GP {SOFOOTCANDLE DIAGRAM Thr dlmrn::ons for the -s0100lcandle dtagrams that follow mi trac4 3 6 -3 12 are based on the mounting hembl of the floe light The, shape of the Isofootcandle diagrams does not change wd h 'Is lrrenI mnunting heights so only one diagra m is regwred I'll Pnch anminq point. The arming point. (v) . is also based on Ihrt mounting height. In IhP example (Aiming Point MH x 2), the floodlight is aimed a distance, of Iwo mounting heights array from a point on the grnund directlit below the floodlight. This would be 80 *eel for a 40Joot mounting height. fsolootcandle diagrams for two or thrirr• (fdlerent aiming points are shown for each floodlight onnitins36 -3 2. Each isoloolcandle line showswhere the loot- Candle IOVel is the same. These Imes are dentdted by a letter which is used with the footcandle chart. The footcandle values botwe,nn a010otcandle lines do not change more than LA. This makes it posslble to approximate the level between bries, The gndpatternis also basedon the mounting height Thegnd Ira^ values loll and tight gl.._ the distance to either side of the floodlight The vales up the side Show the distance iniinewith the nlming direction of the floodli5 1. The number S. for instance. rnpresen:s 5 x 40 or 200 feet from a 40-foot! mounting height. For cor,,plex fighting installations the isofootcandie diagrams car ee redrawn to the same scale as the workin? drawings. The dashed Imes on the sample isofootcandle diagram show the practical edge of the light L-eam. The edge of adjacent beams should overlap these fires in order to have uniform Iighfng. ISOFOOTCANDLE VALUES The toll3winft table gives the tootcandte value for each iso- footcandle curve at a =cecilic mounting 1 )fight. The values for each letter a e the Sarnia on each set of curves. This makes it Possible In compare diagrams directly and interpolate be- tween curvet for different aiming distances. -:100W MOUNTING HEIGHT 40 s0 60 A 0.16 01 0.08 .B _ GENERAL r 0.2 ORDERING INFORMATION C 0.78 0.5 n net aedr'r in 1,at.•r•a1a1n0 numpnr Imm IagIC rte• nv D j 1.0 A 1 a4 +• 1.1 3"2 pram V.D. 1Al drq,IS to bnalrle WIa10g and +ntnrt TIIlnpr;f i 1 -- . 2.0 lYln enrdn•.ng F - . 5.0 — yENEnA r0nP85E 9ase Calelop Number Net WI. 15.6 100 o1G r �Lbs.) • —1 1 15.0 F507X503L� Li 0A'CA 1000 Watl LYW1o4• *r503L 40AGa 400Watts, Si t 1 C 10. - r 7:Sd]Mt S�.•GA- 7:ww4f MMal "BildsR 4g -S."• ' . 1 i -5 -G& 1000Wa1[ MMAN.1We • i x507 '!•A_GA 400 Watt MnC1 H.11de •Ingmalnl p.NUtl Voltage Inset }vngle d+qd lordCSeed votlage Sec Voltage fable. $nlyd lme —Hb AIndK.11nt NEMAbelrirtyrie Insert Smgie digit for desired Woe. Sde AVadabrbly table [Cited line — GP {SOFOOTCANDLE DIAGRAM Thr dlmrn::ons for the -s0100lcandle dtagrams that follow mi trac4 3 6 -3 12 are based on the mounting hembl of the floe light The, shape of the Isofootcandle diagrams does not change wd h 'Is lrrenI mnunting heights so only one diagra m is regwred I'll Pnch anminq point. The arming point. (v) . is also based on Ihrt mounting height. In IhP example (Aiming Point MH x 2), the floodlight is aimed a distance, of Iwo mounting heights array from a point on the grnund directlit below the floodlight. This would be 80 *eel for a 40Joot mounting height. fsolootcandle diagrams for two or thrirr• (fdlerent aiming points are shown for each floodlight onnitins36 -3 2. Each isoloolcandle line showswhere the loot- Candle IOVel is the same. These Imes are dentdted by a letter which is used with the footcandle chart. The footcandle values botwe,nn a010otcandle lines do not change more than LA. This makes it posslble to approximate the level between bries, The gndpatternis also basedon the mounting height Thegnd Ira^ values loll and tight gl.._ the distance to either side of the floodlight The vales up the side Show the distance iniinewith the nlming direction of the floodli5 1. The number S. for instance. rnpresen:s 5 x 40 or 200 feet from a 40-foot! mounting height. For cor,,plex fighting installations the isofootcandie diagrams car ee redrawn to the same scale as the workin? drawings. The dashed Imes on the sample isofootcandle diagram show the practical edge of the light L-eam. The edge of adjacent beams should overlap these fires in order to have uniform Iighfng. ISOFOOTCANDLE VALUES The toll3winft table gives the tootcandte value for each iso- footcandle curve at a =cecilic mounting 1 )fight. The values for each letter a e the Sarnia on each set of curves. This makes it Possible In compare diagrams directly and interpolate be- tween curvet for different aiming distances. -:100W MOUNTING HEIGHT 40 s0 60 A 0.16 01 0.08 .B 0.31 0.2 0.17 C 0.78 0.5 035• D 1.6 1.0 0.69 E 31 2.0 1.4 F 7.8 5.0 35 G 15.6 100 0,9 H 23.4 1 15.0 1 10.4 SAMPLE ISOFOOTCANDLE VALUES m M E2 7 0 POWR•SPOT* FLOCODLIG. POSE L•siedrn GFAAQ75F .ICAwn ,•rti_. ­.ee 1 T Ae i '.�� f�Q •fir 4y�rW� 5PECIFICATION CHECK ✓ Heave -dory.r gmetal purpose (NEMAI ✓ O,n "? ballatt IW11tmq ✓ All non {Ono VVL• hafdNate ✓ irmpnrnd door q :am ✓SnAled and MVWarlrgnred ooli at ar4mbly ✓ Hmged door for O.Kx lamp amess SAMPLE ISOFOOTCANDLE DIAGRAM Aiming Point MH x 2 Rcrm Lot 1, ". ` . • t HEIGHT CORRECTION — The mounting heights given in the table are representative for the wattage and beam pattern associated with the floodlight. To convert to other mounting heights use the following formula: tic) (M H') _ tic) (MH2) From Chert New For example, a 5 looleandle level at o0 IL (isofootcandle curve F) would havE a value of 4.13 at 55 ft. mounting height. (5) (501) = (fc) (557) fc = 4.13 MAX{!VIUM ISOFCOTCANDLE VALUE The centermost 4sofootcandle tines give the maximum illumi- nation value the floodlight will produce at a particular aiming point and mounting height. Forgood uniformity this value shoutd not be more than three times the average initial tight level. Higher values are possitte, bui will result in hot spots rraar the .. floodlights and lower light levels elsewhere. IR t ff of 1ryff _ Cif or t h 1 � Q "Al a i C� t I Q JK ulva'vr J_1'_.!__L_L l sPc►� 0 � -tY arce�rMlrc ]v!i@8_ '�' �• �tivd c.zra'IJ. ' JtCO/ (I J�ax • I - imlr R LT ff i *H*M �— �. xvws l sl iey is �rwy ( I L_ 1 nas��rr 1 z�r�rra IlF'SlnYlc:NflY Nl/t1.9{er Oi2fW —�-- r •; ! Baworyu J.wl /l De mllrwb�J.K.(a4t/ I 1 NYL S2ar10MN/I.fF 31iIA•F� BMWFY.ZN,:J'Or�tSl' yPAK.4tI'Fu I3OmS � JJO /r 0.16 Footcandle spillover - YP1DJ 1tl1'2.[OX f 0.16 Footcandle = .00533!• or 407 of mimimum street 11gh= - .32 Footcandle spillover 0.32 Footcandle = .01666% 1 or 80% of a mimimum street l gh= 0.64 Footcandle spillover -0-64 Foo :candle = :02133% - MRTH -er 1.5 of a mimimum street light CITY OFyr -� RANCHO CUUkMONGA PLAMIN�'G DIVOON . E3{.Ei[BfT. SCALE =�_ r,_ q e R ;, Z � tir.1 i ':y' k :i Z ;y. `y`Siyj:a Z N.' r NN 9- 0 ' A TWO? AC Flo 1 ' A TWO? AC DATE: TO: FROM BY: SUBJECT: vci, c. va- avcza�vuv Vv VL1141VSV 1713, STAFF REPORT June 25, 1986 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Howard N elds, Assistant Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13275 - CLAYTON CROSSING LYNNHAVEN MASTER PL19 'HASE II - The total development of 19.2 acres of land in the Medium -High Residential District (14 -24 du /ac) into a three lot residential subdivision for the development of a 290 unit multi- family condominium complex, Phase II of the Master Plan of Development for 900+ condominium r.nits, located on the north side of Highland Avenue, 1200 feet east of Haven Avenue - APN 202- 2 ?1 -02, 23. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of Tentative Tract Map, elevations, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Project Density.- 19.0 du /ac C. Surroundinq Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant, Low Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac). South - Vacant, Low Residential-(2-4 du /ac). East - Vacant, Medium High Residential (14 -24 du /ac). West - 17 12922'(Phase 1, Lynnhaven Master Plan) under construction, Medium High Residential (14 -24 du /ac). D. General Plan Desi nations: Project Site :—Medium High-Residential/Master Plan. North - Low Medium Residential /Master Plan. South - Low Residenital. East - Medium Residential /Master Plan. West - Ni.,ighborhood Commercial /Master Plan. E. Site Characteristics: The site is approximately 19.2 acres that slopes from north to south at sbout 7% grade. Scattered chaparrei, native shrubs and grass occupy the site with two (2) Eucalyptus windrows that transverse the site from east to west. The applicant has filed i Tree Removal Permit that indicates removal of 29 mature Euualyptus (Spotted Blue Gum) trees (see Section III -E and attached report for additional details). .ITEM E 7 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TEKTAT.r42 TRACT 13275 - CLAYTON CROSSING June 25, 1!186 Page 2 F. Applicable Regulations: This project is subject to the Master Plan designation of the General Plan, with project implementation proceeding under the approved Lynnh ;ven Master Plan and Ordinance 259 (Master Requirements).. G. Project Details: The project: proposal will consist of 2() buildings, either one, two, or three- stories in height. Five (5) floor plans are proposed ranging in size from 686 square feet (one bedroom, one bath) to 1076 square feet (three bedroom, two bath). All of the units are stacked flats, except for one -story four- piexes located along Limon Avenue. Two and three -story buildinys featuring an inner courtyard area with extensive landscaping, .texturized walkways, and raised seating. The elevations reflect contemporary architectural styling with exterior materials consisting of tile roofs, hardboard siding, stucco, and wood trim. The project also features four (4) recreational areas and an extensive water element that meanders along portions of the central open space spine. II. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission reviewed and approved the first phase of the Lynnhaven Master Plan on February 13, 1985, w;iich consisted of 3C8 units on approximately 15 acres of land with density at 20.7 units per acre. At the request of the City Council, a subsequent review of the entire Lynnhaven Master Plan on June 12, 1985, prempted the Commission to recommend the following criteria for Phase II and Phase III: o Reduce the overall Master Plan density; and o Explore alternatives of product types and depth of the density - transition areas; and o Provide better variety of unit design; and o Develop additional mitigation measures to buffer single family homes or lower density housing within Phase II and III of the Master Plan. III. ANALYSIS• A. General: Clayton Crossing represents the second phase of Lynnhaven Master Plan and is filed as a Vested Tentative Tract Mae of 3 lots for condominium purposes. Two Resolutions have been prepared for this project, one for the vested Tentative Tract Map and one for Design Review.' Tire project exhibits the approved framework of s;te development in terms of traffic circulation, recreation areas, and neighborhood identity; however it should be noted that during project review, the Design Review Committee expressed concerns on aspects of the central open space spine. The Committee feat that points along Z- k' PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 13275 -- CLAYTON CROSSING ' June 25, 1986 Page 3 the spine we-e too constricted by building placement. Further, the Committee deemed the proposed spine alignment acceptable only if .1 major open space area is provided in Phase III, similar to Phase I (see Exhibit "C "). Staff requests Commission's direction on this major issue for subsequent review of Phase III (see Exhibit 11G -111), The Master Plan Ordinance encourages that "various produ ^t types" be provided for neighborhood identity and diversity. The proposed product is substantially different from Phase I The architecture in Clayton Grossing (Phase II) utilizes hardboard siding in combination with s .vcco providing a crong neighborhood identity in relationship to Phase I. Further, the buildings are split -level and conform to the sloping terrain to minimize the amc,ynt of grading and retaining walls. In addressing the neighborhood compatibility issue, the buildings are one -story four- plexes along Lenon Avenue transitioning south in two and three -story stacked Plats. B. Design Review Committee; The Committee reviewed the project in terms of the previously mentioned policy direction give.a by the Planning Commission. The Committee determined that the density reduction to 290 units and the depth of transition zones sufficently addresses Commission concerns. However, the Committee held lengthy discussions on the followin% major issues: 1. Open SRace: The lack of a major open area within the central spine Caused the Committee concern. To resolve the issue the applicant agreed to provide a major open space area at the western edge of Phase III. 2. Inner _Courtyard Landscaping: The Committee recommended extensive landscaping including spec ,a4 size trees (241, box or larger) that grow well wi shaded areas, climbing vines, shrubs, and groundco4 In addition, courtyard areas should be enhanced with._ iched paving and benches. i 3. Architecture: The Committee recommended treating the three -story blank wall within the inner courtyard elevation with hardboard siding, replacing canvass awnings with small trellis cover over windows, and + providing breaks in roof plane and variation of roof height for Buildings 2.1, 2.2, 2.5, and 3.2. 4. Carports and Garages; Due to the lengthy discussions on a number of major issues, the Committee devoted less time on carport design. Critical design details such a,; a pitch roof, decorative end treatments, and width of fascia and wood trim were not thoroughly discussed. In light of previous concerns and actions by the City 77 79771 R ANING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TERIATIVE TRACT 13275 - CLAYTON CROSSING June 25, 1986 Page 4 Council and Planning Commission on the issue of carports and garages for multi- family dwellings, staff would like to request full Planning Commission consideration of this issv. , 'Staff is seeking direction on details for the garages and carports. However, the Planning Commission ,day wish to defer this matter back to the Design Revi4v Committee. C. Technical Review Committee: The Committee reviewed and determined that the project is consistent with all applicable standards and requirements subject to the follnwing conditions: 1. Overhead utilities that exist along tl�e project side of Highland would normally be required to go underground, however, this area of Highland Avenue will later revert to the Foothill Freeway (see Exi+.bit I'M "). CalTrans is currently designing the freeway'_> stem with final grades and alignments. Since the freeway, in this particular aiea will be above ground, chances are that underground utilities will need to be relocated and /or protected. In order to prevent unnecessary costs in placing the overhead utilities underground twice, now, and again when the freeway is constructed, the Committee is recommending on in -lieu t`e'e be paid for future undergrounding during construction, the freeway. 2. Provide a temporary access route tc• Highland Avenue. Route is to be located at the southwest corner with reciprocal access for Phase I and II. 3. ThP Fire District required a number of Special Conditions such as fire alarms for all three-story- structures, knox boxes installed at each recreation area and clubhouse, and widening the entrance at Lemon to minimum 20' wide on both sides of median. D. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study wa- completed by thn applicant. Staff conducted a fiel'4 investigation and completed Part 11 of the Initial Study which ideitifies several environmental impacts that can be thoroughly mitigated (refer to Part II, Initial Study) and the following major unavoidable adverse environmental impacts: Impact o in the event of a seismic occurance of 6.5 - 7.5 magnitude, unavoidable adverid impacts are possible along both the Cucamonga and Red Hill Faults, ground motion will directly affect structural integrity of buildings. E -� E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 13275 - CLAYTON CROSSl.,"G June 25, 1986 Page 5 13 Proposed Mitigation Measure o Application of strict seism4s standards of the Upiform Building Code. o Adherence to the City of 1'hncho Cucamonga iradina Standard. i Impact o Noise _xposure identified through the acoust cal study indicates noise contours from centerline of Highland 430' north into project site (see Exhibit "I"). Noise sources from the future Foothill Freeway wi'41 produce harmful levels and exposure. According to the General Plan, noise mitigation by CalTrans is inclided in the design of the freeway reducing noise levels by 1ODBA below what would occur without mitigation. Ay new development that lies within 70 -75DBA exterior Noise contours without proper mitigation is unacceptable, In AM addition, noise exposure will occur within dwel ing unit, the fins] acoustical report will iden'iify appropriaLe mitigation measures. Proposed Mitigation Measures a Require a final acoustical analysis showing how noise standards of 65 CNEL 'exterior) and 45 CNEL (interior) can be met for dwellings located within 430 feet of the proposed freeway corridor.• o Buffer the interior of the development by carports and three -story buildings. o Intensify landscapng adjacent to the Foothill Freeway corridor and Lemon Avenue. o Providing noise barriers or walls between noise sources and dwellings. E. Tree Remova", The applicant filed a detailed tree arborist report see t4;.hpd) which discusses aspects of preservation and /or removal oil, twenty -nine (29) Eucalyptus Globulus (Blue Gum). The overall condition of trees identified as worth preserving lie in the path of improven %nts such as circulation aisles, curb and gutter, and proposed buildings. Trees slated for removal exhibit major crown - dieback, poor weight distribution, root loss, second regrowth, and decayed tissue, -etc., however as required per Orr!;nance 37, those trees removed from the project site will be replaced on a one to one basis, with Eucalyptus Malculatta (15 gallon) (See Exhibit "H" for tree locations)._ 7 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 13275 — CLAYTON CROSSING June 25, 1486 Page f IV. FACTS FOFoll FINDINGS: The findings listed on the attached Resolution are supparted by the following facts: A. The proposed subdivision, in cun- unction with the Conditions of Approval, is consistent with the current development standards of the City and the Lynnhaven Master Plan. B. The project is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed number of units within the subdivision. C. Adequate street and storm d.aln improvements will be provided to make the project compatible with the surrounding area and improve circulation and drainage in the vicinity. D. The project is consistent with the General Plan and conforms with thp> Development Standards of the "MII" District in which the site is located. V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Daily Report as a public hearing. In addition, th -a property was posted and notices advertising the public hearing were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of Phase I and the project site. To date, no correspondence has been received regarding the project. VI. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to consider public input and elements of this project. If after *,uct- consideration the Commission concurs with th. Facts for Findings and recommended Conditions of Approval, adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration Would be appropriate. Re fully sybrt'f d, • _ ulI City Planner { BB :NW:ko Attachmelts: Tree Arborist Report Exhibit "A" - Location Map cxhibit �W - Tentative Tract Map 1 Exhibit "C" - Phase I & II Exhibit "D" - Site Plan Exhibit "E" - Conceptual Landscap`rg Plan Exhibit "F" - Ittner.Courtyard Details, Exhibit "GII Grading Plan 4 Exhibit G1 Site Cross - Section (North- South) j f PLANNING COMMttSS'Ok STAFF tEPURT , 7ENTATIYE TRAOT 1.3275 - CLAYTON CROSSING June Z5, 1986 Page i � rt k' Exhibit "M" - Tree Removal Plan Exhibit "I" - Noise Cortours 4 Exhibiit "J -1" - "J -27" - Elevations and Floor Plans Exhibit "K -1," - 1 -3" - Individual Unit Floor Plans Exhibit Carport /Recreation Building Exhibit "M" - Freeway Alignment /Power Pole Locations Initial Study, 'Part II Resolution of Approval For Vesting Tentative Tract Map ' 13276 with Conditions Resolution of Approval for :Design Review with Cohd`iti.ons r i1 �? I ,i 1 r T R E'� Complete Arboricultural servicei REPORT FOR MMLSR COiISUZTTNC GROUP ' V'.rrth,. 4od Town, Center 4-860 Irvine Boulevard,, Suite #201 Irvine, CA 9271t­1 299 OBSERVATIONS k%iD RE u c *�,� ' ; oNs REGARDING TR Ot -AT: CUM N' TRACT 4 -13275 PREPARE'J BY SAMUM L. KNAPP KNAPP TREE SERVICE JM. 6, 1586 WF.. Riverside (714) 688 -6048 Licensed Contractor #481325 Fullerton (714)•447 -884* RE: Inspection of twanty -nine (29) Eucalyptui treess for preservation withii Clayton Crossing, Tract 13275. L- k The twenty -nine trees are principally Eu_. callptus Qlobulus (blue gam,. These treeL4re the remains of windrows struggling for existence with the vicissitr` of nature and Increasing people pressures. ..{teria foe preservation in--olves a, process of identifying the plants ova condition with regards to longevity. The numberi-ng,sequence used in this report correspondes with the tree preservation plan of Morse.Consulting Group. The numbering is starting left to right at the southern end of the property. In my opinion, the followinp trees should be replaced or preserved. +. Replacement: Trees # 1,2,3,6 ,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,,,.14,15,16, & 20. i Preservation: Trees # 5,17 ,18,19,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28, T '9. i Rf?lacement trees: Thera is the reau t. of major crown dieback, poor weight distribution, root loss, second regrowth, decayed tissue loss, etc. Preservation trees: The overall condition of these trees exhibited a healthier condition. There i5 lees-dieback with respect to location in the crown and structural longevity. Trees that are preserved need judicious atteition throughout all phases to su_cesafully ac]i:,_: ize to a changing environment. Avoid disturbing soil environment (leaf iicter) or canopy balance.at any one time. Singularly, soil or canoe, changes are kille ^s, but combined t•.hcg are lethal. Maintain trees within a natural format. _ Crime Pt�.ESERVAT102T REQUIREF[ENTS' FOR FtATURE TREE'` .N �P r. 1. Corrective pruning to specified .SJindards for tree preservation P in urban develap%ent. (Certified Arburist preferred) 2. P;..+:ab ishment 4f undisturoed soil zone-around tree bases,. sex ! at a 12:1 ratio of soil surface width to potent. ^,al trunk diameter: C� j` 3. Cieering of all vegatation and installation of wood chip mulch on a needed basis, retettion of all natural leaf litter beneath carp -pies. 4. Where so- 1 has been compacte6 or otherwise di:;tt %rbed' n the root zone area (particula »ly under canovies), fertilization, aeration, watering via snit injection of &II accesible soil in the root zone. ' 5. "T.nstallation of irr',gation s;steas with capacitor for periodic sep waterl : ^%, during anc ei "qr• (evelopment. 6.:'-Installation of chain link fencing to rrotect•tre>s during development of the area, 7. Examination and documentation of each tree, with specific maintenance /- preservation recommendations.' 8. Transmittal, of recommendations and specisications for con- tinuing, tree maintenance to parties responsible for tree and landscape mans ement on complr_r3.ou of area development. � ' z .. FF ;r STRATEGIES FOR MINIMIZING LIABILITe RISKS 3 t RE: All trees that are to be preserved j Ij CONCERNS: A. Aging urban fozest B. growth c,ft., suburbs C. Environmental factor +1 Strategies: A. Annum: ;n%pect:`on by qualified tree specialists ej B. Avoid crisis management C. Establi -hment of systematic management plan Aim IX Apply ultural principals t Documentation f i t �• 11111111fi X ■ L,i� ru c i •y 11N ♦ .w....a ii �. . .w r • Flo- 1 ■ M: ■I eq, Rat T� iii' � i CITY Q �s- R AI`TC 0 CL;aIMOj' GA. Trrz�= FLA��TNING DMS.ION _ 1 2XHIBIT._ e •� SC'��I E_ 1 TENTATIVE TRACT NQ 13275 A VESTING TENTATIVE:, MAP LEMON. AVENUE ENTRY DRIVE PRIVATE DRIVE SECONDAR'f ACCcSS PRIVATE DRIVE - ;'PRIVATE DRIVE OWNERit _ 11 SUBDIVIDER zAL DESCPoIPTt�N 4 L Lar I _.. — : r r ^` � t• BENC,4 MpRIC �9:uKACRrsES GENERAi NOTES ,\Re � •• rte. es.m- ....°0... . r mot.. LEGEND +. s 4�_ -g'�` '.y.� -�R� -yam•— _+1 R�awffnrxnrtartan � HESFAV�EO.(aq FVI11gE•'•��' FA324S CR-S ^s _ �• Rte' - •�GibrM!1 x —xsse �•�SMgi'S ��'••• Rfzmi�au PUN NORM CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONi G- A TITLE- PL NNNitt D[VEM EXI-HI "�-�" t 1 i f t f t' 1 •�M1 I• �-. 11 F if + It J LIZ t _ Cf� OF nR (CF D CLTOeTG.. TrrLa ='ssar€ , 1CL.t'11 71 \'V D VL7AV1Y LXHIIXl. G NORTH --------------------- _ •—. -- -._ +.c.oe. > +� 9tADNf•.. T.PES. BLDG 21 t '� •' :� :' 1. � _ � ir` :, ELl70, 22 y. _ {j ° •` 4 / \ F ! - ,e —� � c• wear 1 ' -� , .,d..m..-, � ill `��' ��4�•�� •�+' vc' , .�oc.az - _ 6R r . SWM 32S OAF" Sp."Cal .4• LA ,� 111 �' �, , � e.� \ \�: 91CG :t75 t t .1•,*a,r ' Is 17TC�+`. ---"IJ jt t`t�yY �� \ i ♦� • �� 1,T�' �V ` 1 � a t _ ( � C Cam'• � - ' ltlssM ��.a ?tom MCCL 4.1 + CsWtlJCes s as3 MM 4-IS ' ^� z ,�• �-`r,,,....�.�""" -jf I : lat l :. c. - � 1a1rt Sir '1 r..ewY n*.ry b.l � � � k � . t lI {.C.7,- .:•-�• � :ii. .mvcx..crs m..w.+w i-�� + SfM QATA wt neutygM ..,.a •aeu. 4 j � + f i a Y .k NORTH CITY Or" rrE�t: r 7 PLANNING DIti"EDN r. u , r L---Lt ` r 4' ! CONCRETE WALK —�:NE POCKos ---PLAZA ARM W/ ENRICHED PAVING PLAN VIEW lAVfr 'UN(r i cf :.t LMtT — IWyl S IAiT �^ GAAXE L"T �"� rt ' v�TREES GARAGE VINES _ ��t "�'{ '-:�- i .W. i 1r21 °� m4.brnr tur ACEA PAtUATM. M Wt xY �1 :F e[o. r•u ",oc." GAVA CAl.t. QY10STp4 \CLLLLS 1 I Z �. kYWl W "an AAA* 31 KC .Aw,�,otawsx �- "'G I!•� �� mAOEaasrcv..�,AS.j .+ Doop:AFSrs ..mnr.o� w+araAnu 7a>,r, CkL"TRAIM I NT. -.uuuu SECTION A _ SECTION ION B^ SHRUGS GROUND COVERT BUILDING COURTYARD `°"°G` F�, ' ,. .i; 'R PLANT PALETTE CITY OF rra;. ' 72" PLANNI1G DI`13SK 1 E�ti iI[3r[' �� 1-44 L-J SI -1 r ---- - - -- LIEGG E TF 4TATI TRACT 275 CONCEPTUAL GRADING P LAN roRrx CITY ol.- rm. RAiNCTIO CUCAM NC PLAIMMINo r .01 'A Trru. ,pj SGiLZ: w � - 1 saw'ev'+.�w.. � � ,w'1ww ro.. N�v.Iwnw •n.e R ara. iQ t . SITE SECTION NORTH - SOUTH) NORTH CITY OF CUCAMKJl TrrtE: PLANNI u G D[vis m FUXHIW SGLL : -l9 . � wale suw Ka �' �CNPCy 11I!1rya01NF 4[ya� �� '�—�r?CR 3CIfsliElpNi r "LAKE EDGE KTS w � - 1 saw'ev'+.�w.. � � ,w'1ww ro.. N�v.Iwnw •n.e R ara. iQ t . SITE SECTION NORTH - SOUTH) NORTH CITY OF CUCAMKJl TrrtE: PLANNI u G D[vis m FUXHIW SGLL : -l9 ' _r3�r� EE mssLP flfx..Rd tpt .� to ipRiM{>xOtf lfy.1{(}f`tEEG I S CITY QF - RANCHO CUCajMojNGA PLAAI''+Ni1G DjAnSKxN _j io NIORUi CITY OF 2 7 RANa-D C-6CA.' IONGA Tm.El PLANNP�j\'C; DrVISK).N SckLE - -VATEN VATEN VATEN M • ELEVATION A .. ntvncac nX, Le -,L ONE BLDG. 01 NORTH CITY OF, RAINCHO CUCMAONGA Tn,,-F: 454'r el-v- �rl 0 PLAINININiG I)r,,-SK).N EK ii I 81T. SCALE- J* L...r' 0. /ZOta Gf4 GE per i9it,C, :.rr �. ra•``*-...t�:+.,, y�'r�y,;'.s;,�*„�p2�. Y�.�"•�wpt itia .,s,�'r{'�'9'$f�"�a`t�s ELEVATION C ?YrtAL. BJU)M,% AT.RtA.B �A.AIe.(I."N. �R� ■E f f��wppp /410. �^�", �.w.a.� f / I Ill ITC Y[Nt ELEVAi'MaN B rcutrmlae..ar.l�a..tncu '� / ,— msto ' _ OtJt� LsNKsar+S p .s,t a &A.. BLDG . 2.1 .�i CIS or, rrF—v / (MCAl'ulONGA PL"'d NI ILNG >: N L�'VI$Ky,�3 F _ d3 wYi-itBtZ = PZ } tf Al IVOI-o A WA ZW ELEVATION F LL ELEVF''+AN E BLDG, . NORTH cl,w or RL° I C 'Ho } CUCA.IVIONGA PLA.INNI iNc DIVT51�4:�I EXHIBIT. 3 4: -ay - _- __.sc.ti .� S f� vrr -U i_ E.'-�4 tl`.f*[t C,I l�uA��+ —� _ �`� -t V�r.avv LEVEL r.-,F0 f (LEVEL THREE SIMP�AR) Et At C I E1FVAiL. C I r •�: ". `II II 1 i I LEVEL ONE EtEMTfA♦ BL(XL2.t 2.1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANI01rGAA ' LE. PLA.IVNIi`:G Drvis t}V 5 L7eo�' Cfe�6� ' 4, 2 � ' UWE Xa js�- c�.* }� � Irk ELEVATION B ieiev..nw o uw�. r+.oa - t+rc+.a i 'M' uv rmo r.� euv�rde.al rrrcu.. wrt.tia BLDG. 4.4 NORTH CITY OF RANCHO cucAli' oNGA T n u: PLAINNING DiVM.N EXHIBIT •s �` 4 1U'NtS era — Pc'7s atPs+ T et.�G BLDG. . NORn I CITY 01" rrz"l-- 7r-3" RANCIIO CLGA1U \GA TITLE:k'io,� DIVLSEC t`1 _a-1 k•HIL2TI`: SGIi E ""' LEM Tr{p SLSM "THAEE S I AR) ft2V4 —a 1 � J � lJ S C ll i fl M LEVEL ONF, lt ^ T4 NoR:11r ar? � a 5 AI 1 � J � lJ S C ll i fl M LEVEL ONF, lt ^ T4 NoR:11r ar? � a 5 2zof eHaAS6E pe PgA 0 .4� y im NMI ..t °;'�„ 1�•'- �= s:*w;.e�is.��� � :�c,' =c- ;.�1 p3�rw»a�,. A�tt• .ui;..aAiA :,da..ti;3� EON- ELEVATION C EL.EVAMN B iE=A. va.EO.woE -E zw ELEVATUN A SEE EllPq E.1 ELLVn�dS /Q Stnl•4. 411EI.YE. BLDG. NORTH CITY ' TTF�1 I• RANCHO C UCA MO \GA T== PLANNING MN SCALE. ELEVATX)N !_ L � 4 El.rVATION E t jLDG. . Air 5 } I IA KflRTH CITY OF �- RANCHO CUCAIVrONGA TrrLE: PI.A dNIVIi\'G L V - 3p EVHIl3rr. — `7� SGAI.E: j V v ELEVATION C r +� i a '+r- -pia,! t ELEVATION 8 m¢wro n•w+ace+x- rrsc.0 ELEVATION A { •te euac.o z� «tvnatie row tnrx wrtiwts BLDG. 2.%DS 1�t�RTH ,i CITE' OF cra,' RANCHO CUCAT IG EGA •rrrr_r-: ��,���r c� � PL I TIMI G DR SK7!V' _3� E.�CIiIi3ri' -IGS SGtr_E._ EI_EVATKW F ELEVAT)ON E BLDG. Y V FORTH CITY 01, crE�t: 2,7:'13.27'x'°` RANCHO �-- 3� SCALEt � . LEVEL THREE .rr � � •I- f 1 G i lutvxro# e Wl %.144 Y. I '��'* ^^���r Ass s,• .� [L[v41Gi/ • • s a rt y ,R LEVEL T.V6 t[tv4 a• r N ti BLDG.2.31cl is"t 13 r_1 LEVEL ONE Nlok nj` CITY OF T r 32,7,x' , RANCHO C CAMOI GA �rrrLr: •��oD.Pe � . 33 77— r Plo ,off ivc `1. ELEVATION 0 ELEVATION D InVAM l0—" NO" - rncwl cLCYH1iVN H NC ARdq i.l ll1Y�II -1p! K'7 T1Sty YII[11W! I i URni CITY OF, ITEM: R.ANICM CUCAIVI©N A TITLE= PL&N IC \cG DrviSIO�:V E�CHIi3ii': SGILE: i , ,I I . ..•.I �..... -� � �:��:,� ,.� (fit ...�.,..��.���`�f(� ! .� �� ,.I i ._ ELEVATION E +\ C4�w�.p�Ng, �l � tti'sS BLDG. . C NORTH CITY or, UEN • * - � 2-r- RANCHO CUCAI4, ONGA. TITLE: r •n,� ������ -��, PLA,t'�INING DIVISIU.N�E'CHIi3tT: �r J 4< Uai ll.pt Si. LEVEL. r.VO ILEVFL THREE SU A'it Lr ;. ; �i � 1 • • �� EiLMATSM f ' ' , L R l r R • y C ! • s O t C LEVEL ONE bwmu BLDG4,I, NORTH CITY O]`' R-A CFEQ CUCA'VIONGA PL.AINNI \ +z; SC. ,M -�- V F 7 , ELEVATM 0 ELEVA't`ION Dq .� . � —.e - T, � ELEVATION A UN w 2.1 Enr 4 " TVPCAL M MI U g-k BLDG. NORTH CITY --)F M-N i": A32 tree- RANCHO CUCAMONGA TrTL.E-,-A4-R--v-v -7-/'AW-r , PLAIWL NG DRqSIO.N EXHiBrn sc ELEVATCO F ELEVATION E �'LIMl3 /A/co VIN096 ?�yp.cAe- E3LDG� , i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMaNGA PLAT Ni, \r, D r f iVLSltliv E � EXt�i�rr:_____� -r,:� 1 # jHl unowv. t i,Ce f"•f � LEVEL THREE (LEVEL FOUR S;NlrAR) n -Ime -_•'' --, - -..- �� ^.ems- -� 1`°.�S r"'�'�:.�a —�- -� ^ - _ R � t y y r eitvrar - 2 - - --1 LEVEL TwO .ti<DWAM BLDG. L--- -s - - -1 LEVEL ONE�� L j CITY OF PL,A.J�INIi\G DH'VtSK?.N M,iE =__ m-- •r• ELEVATION C ELEVATION O ,tm, -mo s w —m - t"r o A j BLDG. ls ELEVATION .> ftElulL�!II Zl lIEV�Tptl MA 1'nCJil4eKwi{f t` IPTH CITY OF r, .• RANCHO CUCAiMONGA PLANNING Dr- VISK) -N _+.ip EXHIMT= scats: now �=_ Ir �� iTC 7 io yip � ELEVA77CN F J I f• WI,�ajV i�e I7W n.W�Ti�3j` `� ��i� 14 , AE ELEV 1S7pN E BLDG. � h'OFZTI-I CITY Cif, rrFNi'- -rr RANCHO ,�` O C UCC1MVNGA -ULF° PLAiNNri\,G U.'V LSKV, 141 EXHIBti =a k f 1 t t F� LEVEL THPEE :LEVEL .FOUR StA LARA Qem c �ur•ns. o --ice L ,:..i �tcv.tw n LEVEL WIO f� 1 i LEVEL CNE NQR- CITY' QF �.2 a kA In �AMM. Uj ELEVATION C ............. ELEVATION 0 W'U ELEVAMN A 1---J t1�MMtJ 1--4 Et A . 11miomw a8ra I An BLDG. LEVEL ONE LEVEL TWO (LEVEL THREE SIMILAR) CITY OF RANCHO CLTCAjMoNGA TrrL.E- PLAINN111\r, L)p. LSION —amap. _r 1'ImI �-nt`r tru_ r ELVAT04 F Fla I Fnsb e r S r ELEVATION E ELDG. 4. NGRTH CITY CAF RANCHO C-TTCAMOiNGA PLAiNNINC, DNGSKl'�i EYHIBtT: 3 —1 �y SC LD ms M.EVATION C h� e as 1 1 BLDG. s � 11, ELEVATION Dq:yna.FF+..aaF.a.ol....�� F �w � ; i' ���'�� -- �— •,::mss -•=.� M�,�. .wrF "r.lYlt p. e EEVATICN A [- V [ R4LMq L\ [LLVAnpq /p rptii WFOW,� • 1 tit i 1 • [IF.VAIpF r E LEVEL'ONE LEVEL THREE (LEVEL FOUR SIMILAR) Fl£ /anOM C t C�- s 1 �� WFOMS/. va�r»v, I" 1 111 llLYalRf. A �. LEVEL TWO NORTH CITY OF ITEN, = r-77 RANCID C'C.TCAaI� OINGA Tom:. P"NNING D IVISIOIV tzBR' I Y■ y > q M.EVATION C h� e as 1 1 BLDG. s � 11, ELEVATION Dq:yna.FF+..aaF.a.ol....�� F �w � ; i' ���'�� -- �— •,::mss -•=.� M�,�. .wrF "r.lYlt p. e EEVATICN A [- V [ R4LMq L\ [LLVAnpq /p rptii WFOW,� • 1 tit i 1 • [IF.VAIpF r E LEVEL'ONE LEVEL THREE (LEVEL FOUR SIMILAR) Fl£ /anOM C t C�- s 1 �� WFOMS/. va�r»v, I" 1 111 llLYalRf. A �. LEVEL TWO NORTH CITY OF ITEN, = r-77 RANCID C'C.TCAaI� OINGA Tom:. P"NNING D IVISIOIV tzBR' ELEVATION F m;s ELEVAMN E C LAY TO N 0 sSo" 1 N Cm` BLDG.42s LANSEN bEVELOPMENT SOUTH, INC; f.l OOYER VRIVE , SUITE %NEWPQRT BEACH s m 92163 III CITE' OF rrai: _:z2. t3.2 mss- PLjv,4 -,' i,Nr, DiVtac'K).N _ SXHIBi'i': SCGILE: NORTH I I JIF7771 A M F—raa �i.. _47; OEM 10, S'..EVAMM C MM CIS BLDG h roL, 'Uri MLE"... ELEVATK)N pj t ZZ ELEVATION A LEVEL THREE (LEVEL FOUR SImILAR) ci LEVEL ONE EWAm 0 LEVEL TWO u Smw. ttrv- . , Norm, ci,.I' -Y or I . r...r- . i rm,m- RAN-CHO CUCAMONGA TrrL.E- 7-ACAIS PLAINNLIING DT n T7 r,. t ELEVATION F rs• - E s _ ELEVATION E 11 BL®G 3b Nola, CITY OF rrEtiR= II c }}j .aarawo�.u� z aoaoarz eai» 0-11 A ..at Flli f ' 'ACC4 r OATH t.. iy e waaR _y__ UNIT PLANS NORTH CITY OF RANGD CUCAMONGA TiTu. �t�u,� PLANNING I} MY.,I E-y� LXHtI3TT: -L" �SGALE: UNIT o „zn. i J •` J i `i ✓♦ / '�' <• J III- i EEDROOR.2&1TIM I tl rp � � 1- '^ ! �� li i nom♦ � 7 CCOMAM i C C"TVAhD CLRTYnp6 f" a I - UNIT 8 -lisp JI�IitlhR 1 BE,AOW , BATH Fk N't-'3v UNIT PLANS ri Ex I�'aRTH` CITY OF RA.NCI -gyp CUCAMo \GA Tmj-. PLAINNI\G DrVL7KN E Sty YHIF i'F: 4{ Z, SG1iE= k I I t UNIT E -,, 1 DMR00W i SAIH UNIT FLANS CITY OF O r RANCHO CLCANIO \GA Pi.AiAMMING DIVZSD.N �.-�� EXHIBIT: i ,we r.r.:.., Ucnlii ' PEAR EIEYAt1CH as man. as mewoe m»rneAVsIEVA'{10N B . ELEVATION C ELEVATION D vAwmse .../f�l�K�f. M nn+m.o. gaK�w � it ELEVATION D LAUNDRY BUILDING j ,G4C ELEVATION G BF1Ga141A � -• � J /`oa� � I 5V WWR tee~ E'EVAT B R1Vllp O �� . IIEI',REA!lON BUILDILVO, lGUd. VP. ELEVAM A mmsu 21 LtLV\,pq •¢„»rev Wi[fy,�y CITY OF RANCHO LCAMO GA Pi.AiVNI \''G ^ ' � - pi ^' ` ' NORTH ��. C - A-_O- GA -,^-. ~ PLANNING [I\/%MN 2}C8DDO� ' CITY OF Rl"CHO C11CZMONGA PART II INITIAL STUDY EWIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DATE: 7A6 APPLICA::Y:_ cILI::i, DATE: f /d* �f LOCr I�'MMER: PROJECT: i^ . �o� r c�'+2�.SSiorrS ��S�1L PROJECT LOCATION:fS p f /`y >/ i�i�lti ✓1�F r'di7 '.sj y,�YG Z. ENIIIRO::-1ENTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets). YES W.YD" No 1- Soils and GeolaR Wili`the proposal have Ank significant results _n: a. Unstable ground conditions cr in changes in geologic relationships? b. Disruptions_ displacements, compaction or burial of the soil? c- Change in topography or ground surface contour intervals? d. The destruction, covering or modification Of any unique geDlogic or physical features? e. Any potential increase in wind or water erosion of soils, affecting either on or off site corditons? V---" f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? g- Exposure of peopie or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud - sliles, ground failure, or•similar hazarc:s? h. An increase in the rate of extraction and /or use of any mineral resou_ee? / 2. Hydrology, Will the proposal 11ave significant _- results, ins Pagd w YrS ?AYE£ 1d a• Changes in currents, or the course of direction c`. flowing streams r ivei or ephemeral street c;iannels. b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage or 6e rate and amorint of surface watesatterns, runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood - waters? I# d• Change in the amount of surface water in any body of ' water? e. Discharge into surfa,:e waters, or any alteration I : of surface water quality? r f Alteration of groan, water characteristics? —' G g. Change in the quantity of groundwaters, either through direct ` additions or with- drawals, or through interference with aquifer? an Quality? Quaatity ?' h. The reduction in the amount of water other- wise _. available for public water supplies? i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or seiches? 3• Yir Quality. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Const;.c or periodic air emissions from mobile or indirect sources? Stationary sources? Y / b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or _ interference with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? C. Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? 4. Biota Flo:d• Will. the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or number of any species of plants ". .� b, Reduction of the numbers of IV unique, or endangered species of pianL� q rare 1 ?age 3­I- ES `NYBE So C. Introduttion of new or disruptive species of plants into an area? _ d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural Production? / Pauna. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or numbers Of any species of animals? b. Reduction of th.-. numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? C. Introduction of nev or disruptive species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migzation or mov,PAenr of animals? 1� f d. Deterioration or rem val of existing fish or wildlife habitat? 1 5. POD wildlife Will the proposal have significant v results Its in; a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of the human populrtion of an area? b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or JC create a demand for additional housing? 6. Socio- Economic Factors. Will the proposal have significant results in« a. Change in local or regional socio- economic characteristics, wn :luding economic or commercial diversity, tax rate, and property values? b. Will project costs be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax payers or project users? 7. Land Use and Plannine Considerations. Will the proposal have significant results in? i a. A substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? b. _ A conflict with any designations, objectives, policies, or adopted plans of any gove :'ental entities? r / Y C. An impact upon the qulairy or quantity of Existing consumptive or non- consumptive - ` recreational opportunities? Fagg 4 Y£S taa 8. Transportation. Will the proposal have significant results in. a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existir. , streets, or demand for nev street construction? c. Effects an existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? F d. Substantial impact upon existing transporta- tion systems? e, Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion movement or of people and /or goods? Alterations to or effects on present and ,r potential water- borne, rail, mass transit or air traffic? g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 'J. Culturale Resources. Will the proposal have signi:ican� results in: a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, paleontological, and /or historical resources? 10. Health, Safety and Nuisance Factors. Will the i, proposal have significant results in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health j` hazard? b. Exposure of people to ? p potential health hazards. % }` c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances in the event of an accident? -- ` d. An increase in the number of individuals --- .. 4 or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure ,f people to such organisms? e. Increase in existing noise levels? f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous noise levels? g•. The crea*ion of objectionable odors? h. An lucrease,in light or glare? _ f SE — �!l .5 Page 5 '? t YES NO 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant # tesuits in: a. The obsi:uction or degradation of any scenic vista or view ?' b. The creation of-on aesthetically, offensive ' site? c. A conflict with the objective of designated or potential scenic corridors? 12. Utilities and Public Servi.s. Will the Proposal ' have significant a need rar new systems, or alterations to the following: a. Electric power? / b. Natural or packaged gas? c. Communications systems? / d. Fl2ter supply? / e. Wastewater facilities? i f. Flood control structures? g. Solid waste facilities? ^— I / h. Fire protection? i. POlics protection? -- J. Schools': k. Parks or other recrearional facilities? L Maintenance of public facilities, including roads and flood control facilities? a. Other govsrrr,anr.a.} ceSJit es? 13. Eneray and Scarce Res,lurces. Will the proposal have r/ significant results in: a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing —L sources of energy? C. An increase in the demand for development of Aft new sources of energy? d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumption of non -- renewable forms of energy, when feasible renewable sources of energy are available? %'` r' Z l�J E -S9 8e YES MAYBE HD e. substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or scarce natural resource? 14. bianda 'ory Findia> s Of SisL t fican�> a. Does the, project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environments substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish,or wildlife population to drop below-'self Sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate, a plant or artmal community, reduco the number ax- restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important; examples of the major periods of California history or p,',ehistory? ...._� b. Does Che project have the potential to achieve i short- term, to the disadvantage of longwt:erm, environmental goals? (A short -term impact on the environment is one -which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long - tex.l impacts will endure well into the futv,re). c. Does the project Have impacts which Are r _ individually limited, but cumulatively,! considerable? (Cumulatively considerable meens that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, and probable future projects), d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or Indirectly? IZ. DISCU5SIM DF E,I�'IRp_ ;T.tEy2A1 EVALUATION (i.e., of affirmative rmative the above questions plus a discussion of Proposed mitigation answers to measures). E -S9 On the basis of °this initial evaluation: W'J �^ Z find the Proposed project GO[3LD NOT_have a significant effect on the envi r Qnt1 and a h'EG.'TIVE DECLARATION will be prepared, find t� ;although the proposed pro,eet could have a significant ✓` effect rn the environment, there will not be a significant effect in` -M�, cc..�k, because the mitigation measures ;, s% bed on an ached sh.et have,been added to the " Project, :1 vEGATZVG DEGL= RATION WILL BL' pR£pAI LD. E I find the prapased proj;ecx- XkY have a significant effect on the envirnmert, and an EWIAO: 'IT LMPACT REPORT is required, " Date y!/�1S �P ✓,•�i. .. ^ $Affttire 1 J i __ ___? .•'ter.'`:. .ink .. lc.,e.,g. - The proposal wilt result in the movement of soil and changes to ground surface contours due to drive aisle and other on -site development improvements The project will expose soils to wind erosion and will be conditioned to acq�Sre a dust' control permit,, The site will be subject to geologic hazards in the event g'j a seismic occurance of 6.5 - 7.5 magnitude. A deLaiied geologi:.',al study will be required, prior to issuanCe,of buildinc -, permits. 2b• - Proposal will change existing absorption rates with the constructiwon of impervious surfaces whi'ch,increases the amount of surface ran -off. Aspects,;of drainage is under the direction of the City Engineer. Appropriate drainage facilities w411 be required to convey and dispose of surface run -off. 4a.,c. - Proposal will replace all existing vegetation with new plant sp.ecie;F,, thereby increasing the distribution and diversity of _plants on the subject cite and surrounding area. Additionally, the project will cause migration of existing animal population to less developed areas. 8a.,b. - The proposal will cause substantial amounts of vehicular traffic, however new street improvements and construction with turn - pockets and signalized intersection at Lemon and Paven will mitigate traffic impacts. Also, Conditions of Approval are in a place to effectively mitigate traffic impacts. 18e.,f. - Proposal will expose people to harmful levels of noise. The i applicant will be required to submit a final acoustical study identifying mitigation measures to conform to City Standards of 45DBA for interior levels and 65DSA for exterior noise levels. 14a. - Project proposal will substantially affect any present wildlike population. In all likelihood, cause the relocation /migration of various animal populations due to developmerit and human settlement. .fi RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,- ,CALIFORNIA, CAi1TIONALLY APPROVING VESTED TENTATIVE U(ACT MAP NO. 13275 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 13275, hereinafter "Mn" submitted by Lansen Development South, applicant, for the purpose of subd `Viding the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, describeo as the total development of 19,2 acres of land in the Medium -High Residential District (14 -24 du }ac) into a throe (3) lot residential subdivision for the development of a 290 unit multi family condominium complex, Phase Ii of the Master Plan of Development for 900+ condominium units, located an the north side of Highland AVenue, 1200 feet east of Haven Avenue - APN 202- 271 -02, 23, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on June 25, 1986; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has .considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NO'el, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Vested Tentative Tract No. 13275 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Cede, and Lynnhaven Master Plan; (b) The design or- improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and Lynnhaven Master Plan ;; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or ;heir habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 13275 - CLAYTON ; - CROSSING June 25, 1986 page 2 (9) Thit this project will not create a0 verse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Vested Tentative Tract Map No. 13275, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Skandard Conditions: Tentative Map 1. Drainage: a) Applicant shall be required to jo,,n the Assessment District for construction of Line 4N of the Master Plan of Drainage prior to recordation. b) The Assessmen� strict shall be formes or construction ci Line 4N of the Master Plan of Drainage prior to, recordation, of the map. c) If the Assessment District is not formed, then the applicant shall obtain all off -site easements for tKI .Master Plan of Drainage Line 4N, provide security for the construction of Line 4N prior to recordation and construct the entire Line 4N prior to occupancy. - d) If the applicant constructs the Master Plan of Drainage Line 4N, then the City shall provide for a reimbursement agreement prior to occupancy, e) All other temporary and interim drainage control. , devices recommended in the final approved drainage stucy, shall be implemented -to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. f) A private storm drain system shall be constructed along~ the southerly portion of the proposed development and shall be extended to include service to the Existing development to the crest and the future development to the east. 2. Traffic and Access: a) In addition to the standard one -half street section improvements for Lemon Avenue, a 14 -.foot wide paved lane shall be provided on the north side of the centerline. This •portion of pavement . shall be subject of c'�st reimbursement upon development of the property to the north. b) An interim secondary access shall be provided to Highland Avenue to the satisfaction of the City Traffic Engineer, City Planner and Cal Trans prior to occupancy and shall remain 'a secondary access until such time that the Foothill 'reeway is constructed. C -�� ,, PLANNING COMMIS 5109 AESOLQTION NO. Y TT 1312175 - CLAYTtON CROSSING ` June= 25, 1986 Page 3 �. 3. Overhead Utilities: The applicant shall pay, prior to recordation of the .Final Map, a ee in -1,eu of undergrounding all overhead electric a line and telecommunication lines along the Highland Avenue frontage � from the westerly property line to the easterly property line. Said °r fee shall' be one -half of the front foot cost of undergrounding, as ' established by City .Council Resolution 86 -14. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF JUNE, 1936. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF .RANCHO CUCAMONGA i BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: 1� B-ad Buller, Deputy beCretary 9 I� Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of June, 1986, by the folloriing vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS. AI'SENT: COMMISSIONERS•. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 13275 LOCATED NORTH SIDE OF HIGHLAND AVENUE, 1200 FEET EAST OF +: HAVEN AVENUE, APR 202- 271 -02, 03 IN THE MEDIUM -HIGH RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (14 -24 DU(AC) • WHEREAS, on the 16th day of April, 1986, a complete applic_'ion was filed tiNy Lansen Oeveifo(�ment Soc;h_ for review of the above- describ: d project; and WHEREAS, on the 25th day of June, 1986, the Rancho Cucamong, Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above- descr-ibed project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resclved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed us-- is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and 3. That the proposed use is irr compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the Public health, safety, or welfare, or materially Injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That Design Review for Tentative Trz:.', 13275 is approved subject to the following conditions and attaches. Standard Conditions: Planning Division: 1. The final detailed site plan, garding plan, and landscape plan shall be submitted for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits and shall be drawn to a scale of 1 " =20' (or larger). 2. An erosion and dust control plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building and Safety Division prior to issuance of building permits. E -(O_- E PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, TT 13275 - CLAYTON CROSSING June 25, 1986 Page 2 3. Noise standards of 65 CNEL (exterior) and 45 CNEL (interior) shall be met for dwellings located within 430' feet of -the Route 30 freeway corridor. A final acoustical analysis shall be submitted with the construction drawings to plan checking prior to issuance of building permits. 4. All outdoor mailbox locations shall le covered and appropriate lighting provided. The final design of any freestanding structure for this purpose shall be compatible wi..h the building architecture and shall be submitted for review any approval by the Planning Divisioni prior to issuance of building permits. 5. Landscape finger planters (minimum 6 -foot outside dimension) shall be provided along the main circulation aisie between every ten to fifteen parking stalls. 6. Low level lighting shall be provided in all open space areas. Construction details shall be provided prior to issuance of building permits. 7. Outdoor storage shall he provided for -.,ll individual units, such as carport lockers or storage closets a, acent to patios. Construction details shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Division pr.r to issuance of building permits. C`. Trash enclosures shall be provided with overhead trellis work. 9. Final landscaping plan shall provide unifying landscaping theme for entire Phase II including special accent shrubs and trees to delineate pedestrian linkages to central open space spine area, subjei, to review and approval by City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. 10. Special landscaping entry statement at lemon Avenue entry and. at southerly shared entry with Phase I shall be provided on final landscaping plans (i.e. special accent shrubs /trees and annual color). 11. Dense landscaping (15 gallon trees, 15' on center) shall be provided along entire south and east property line. A minimum FO% Evergreen tree tyre shall be utilized as wind mitigation. 12. Final landscaping plan shall provide dense planting of trees (15 gallon) along all 4aiidings with southerly and westerly solar exposure to mitigate solor heat gain. Additionally, planting materials within inner courtyard areas shall be comprised of specie, types that grow well in shaded areas. Where possible, small vine pockets for. creeping planting materials adjacent to garage doors and ` trash enclosures shall be provided as well. 13. The final design of the covered carports shall be reviewed and approved ,y the Design Review Committee and shall have as a minimum decorati,z end treatments_ matching the building materials used elsewhere in the project, and minimum 2" x 12" fascia plant -•ons µ K7,,7- 7 PLANNING COMMISSION# RESOLUTION NO_ ; TT 13275 - CLAYTON CROSSING June 25, 1966 Page 3 14. SuhmlM_'material sample board to City Planner for review and approval prior to issuance,of building permits. 15. Submit ign penait application and details of project directory sign and other monument signs to the City Planner for review and approval, a prior to issuance of building permits. 16. Application of strict seismic standard, of the Uniform Building Code shall be applied to the project. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF JUNE, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Y BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATIEST: Brad Buller, Deputy ecretarry.- I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly anJ regularly introduces, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the' - City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of J,Fne, 1966, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIOERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: u Z S V � N U V � O � z qH n 0 F .Zf. ti u u F J cl 2 W u. .CY G O Ya' CY L L gg T T w 4 r N CA 4 L N p� T h ` OTC - Cw7 rT Ca°+_ n NCY. ^tT v VZ C .+tl GZ n�4~ °6 YYNC Oi ...FO� R LIyJ YVM 9LLGC� .tla� O=GO�w 4C ti ^�� T Aga' G L W LL Ep .�wU u ¢SN �� u0 w.. v73 uO° u C a ay ... i a •u ua�nc cn w Npc v.N =vr °o ao. oao'�M p N.. d h2 CrX O 6 7 Hq A Y -.o C Y„ ° vcY.0° q s a°i dl ac u " Uc8 Y p fITYYu E °� S �S V U Cn e`.�iunai :. ►m z= o IZ -aoan cum . - ^ut'L a N_u .. °"'s °m .G 'oco._+ rs ni su m cz CC II Z S V � N U V � O � z qH n 0 F .Zf. ti u u F J cl 2 W u. .CY G O Ya' CY L L gg T T w 4 r N CA 4 L N p� T N a n °v cc AL ^�� M Or -kz uo c •-VY Z Y'H ,Yia u�OL LL Ep .�wU u wN a hY�u ^N.Y. it w.. v73 Z C 6� E�y.L Oars ... i �uc`.I � _ •u ua�nc w Npc NIr %�NCTAn p N.. d h2 CrX O 6 7 Hq �L�L092 1 ON iNw N,c vim. ■ prO9 c,'f cq. a a,c �,sur cz� Lpi s. ux^ Lo. C` L`�N I. cw O.r � a EmLSps.O O'2 y rNt e T Ems^ � �� Urypa_ yL n h 4 rA mane Ano U..°. -� mL d� ii .C-Aa .C,v bb ayW 2^ nObu U NY 4Q"fpE u `'O^ US b dw Yat+,: bug C C FCd cA f Y dC09 � LQ+-L^ II uC �.•- N G rV.. 6 b.O qS O. b y^ • CSNE . KO 6LJ Cate Gyp v =� u g Q,r�LK¢dCi • ° V` ubT� s -0 Fs •°-a m. ncamY adarN �'o cmo m$ga�+ti' a`� A,� pN F6r r0 V d U _ bCY QyV Ot CO � 9. p•p..a... ^RAC C° r.S 00 Lp b6Ew0 .D q ° g44E YOL 'O u YKy4L C =. p, pd aN^ ° o QAdt D. �. N.6 1�L HC4 6��p N4m QY JMb6V9M Ct�� %�ri'N�N Hanggq0 � Ca p '� •"a .tea s E--12 a� 2w apa m 3A G Za A 1 6 c a" 444 NUO .rc°� p CU C t p�9 SOS 4 .fir. E O N E U° a, 1N 6 6 Sy SAN de.ae Nod de„°„ ^b Gd bCCM Q/ '�ac� �rgNaA _ puE dqU Amain aa..uL M dp� � .O b CN .^ia.� Spy V q 4 b`^ ms E L b r C a S b ^ •.-• C- N� E, sEN >b,p MN. Y A t ° 4,� ^� pt A r as 3 d Za 6q r' y> uaA q w`Q L.Sy T °=d?.M .0 T p 3 anti r�yC ^d q °Ey ONb clt. ,.N.'LR UCC °E . C.. NCr MC d.u0 bCA Na4.F ...Jq LA pab q��y CNU Y� ryb Na AOOL 6N C .`t7 UC N ^C CN 3 N v CED,d 0a d C q A _ C61C 3p i�A ° b.0 LY E AC.S` G'm, Ma ^b S E db` QO b ^9 d. ^`L °YdE)y„y j =N.3 F3F ��C +dam m � bu Av—pi �q. Cr V..C.vE uCb E4V u"u O -LS'Oy A °P€ �C� <VC TOE �4EEgE K O T Oa.N San EO L � 26 i 3mva Y 6C1 O_q ^... q` L � d C A E C � O� p�- it .� � d d 4• � � TF C —k Er W^^ I Y C C Q L A M p prO9 c,'f cq. a a,c �,sur cz� Lpi s. ux^ Lo. C` L`�N I. cw O.r � a EmLSps.O O'2 y rNt e T Ems^ � �� Urypa_ yL n h 4 rA mane Ano U..°. -� mL d� ii .C-Aa .C,v bb ayW 2^ nObu U NY 4Q"fpE u `'O^ US b dw Yat+,: bug C C FCd cA f Y dC09 � LQ+-L^ II uC �.•- N G rV.. 6 b.O qS O. b y^ • CSNE . KO 6LJ Cate Gyp v =� u g Q,r�LK¢dCi • ° V` ubT� s -0 Fs •°-a m. ncamY adarN �'o cmo m$ga�+ti' a`� A,� pN F6r r0 V d U _ bCY QyV Ot CO � 9. p•p..a... ^RAC C° r.S 00 Lp b6Ew0 .D q ° g44E YOL 'O u YKy4L C =. p, pd aN^ ° o QAdt D. �. N.6 1�L HC4 6��p N4m QY JMb6V9M Ct�� %�ri'N�N Hanggq0 � Ca p '� •"a .tea s E--12 V ¢ny `lQ�jc N Nn a eq ° e q p a u o q L b b � NIA Ei,0 qY . IL ...I b? � •^ ro G yi. i. N V O� I L V �. ✓. N V V « a G /�.. Y •- Cj• y� p 6 G�") J a O = [1 ^ is- 73 O N T >a. Ysgt E T NN L'b Ub. G^ 6qa _ LNU� 15 q � C u la b aC t tL� ✓ °u �n v •- oaarL N +N 6.� CH 3N0 i-NL Kiwi u.%�rn >rn VVq P S d u q d N ° Yi l'� ~E >La�Au 3.5 'o a a o u eas Zr I�Na Lam GQ122 Iz _�G °2 .p. FI d« U�OD NG.yiL NI ode qE°' � C :L uo VO N�qT tGI� CV N� Nyd �N^ w Y� u nq G Yu�C qn � u .1 dLV dy qnN agnl V ° ^LL'° w q L -72 N 9 V T> r9r Eya A YN OCO ?1t aL�p lA.a ^u -21 cLU a bva m A o Lai,. aagn54° .54E d q u ° o °Mama eta d .5, °1 2 qY-� ga r E' x ✓ uLb° :'' °`w. NNy bDU —E'' c an L~ f a.+NO ¢q.L.m b > 6aN rn.°, au dro ro.°e.^G.ro � ¢oc vrL °o rl 6•e � ir VI q 0 0 WdY. a W q> ` GtD EL >.� KC a ••N « N �qa ^ ~A C•e •� aY ,..,F�. aY'C O. CG NG v E?� ip °yL p b�= °Uy •Y� E dU �K6 U"^ a T1 wC `d aC�•C.p Ol E N l.dLL 4EO ?G C EG 4R, gO b }`K •.. p , pQ •' «wY.O... 6{Q° VGp. >v' aN. it. ...o � 4 °N O var« ¢g. z Q V °3u sNNy t aq . O. d o ZR N c y _ 'u .. ai •O °qw UCq °'Sgdy 3Oi _� UR5 OPy Y� a� Y °y �L tL. bLLQ b6 a� q_'. iC'16C « W dCa �°dN .• m` si. cacti 44I aC q�0 JCu tyro QCL y `yI u9.W6 4Yyma fU�yY p `oy N •`., C _. L C y acc +s L A`. na^ f N G .G' G. d tv EEA. d °y Cn Yr C °`�° tit M�v s p y ya r •: Q C•` 4S� a 3.qL Ca Q ` N mU. E @. E� J 1D No .r.9,C C.• .� YV i 4L 4✓ CAOj � p � pd °d.Y n a 4 L C O 4 41 L OQi hY: N o N w Cpl+. L b. �� . V VCS G C i a C 4 q w S ti LL V 6 C v J: •° Q TW G !t b Q M ... "0 N L.l. . 476uN 4�. g VD N. � m s I o�eY ayy `Q VV.r" .• GAT � ^ d. ! _° V �.> t C R L ZF D N C C w r G .T �LL T 4 N bJ T °LO >� yC G d y ^`•Gf6 Ny ♦-.� C Cqa O.� ° j � N 6 ^u Q pyj ?� ti .• Ga OGYN yd �a' EE aDl rn LLW Gt L: N n � Nq.. V C �� aMV ^Q,u 1.6 f. m= >rLL A a 4+ S Cl F N ° Q d p S R O y b N a C a O dy yD N� 9HyaW "O ^r. d Q'�C �ivd %Q. .rye CQL�r 04 VWy. Q.•Vy µ.+a.� €�fl N.q 4y uK rkQ C a Lfl. C L .[ Z Z I. 44gt a1.0 PY Y Loo.. °VN+N. ,d iY iL WAX yYo K E 11 N V� 'tF C1 �n Q mg oc -rnu `d ya� L p d y W KpC ant nay }CdVr^ -6 A °O '^r�tMlNq. L C r qs }�C YK6Q6R °�niN bm�u KY cC DAN �gar^+.Ct'C ggOA DON.q�rL'- rncc� oO^ u 9�0 MNe�yV�u SD p Y1= v � a ca a� a n a C ^ ° R Sao v vy oq � x i d 0 u y Eu a n D AY Nd ,qci us ra a« tea' NV- 1 ti �L .crn-a iw X pE N40 Lb W »O ij Y V 5 Q nu s°r crE L T W G ~ y W) a L � u c S L r — °w c° rd NL M� aro_ p EN~ V o L S N O q cF a _� •E v y u « N E u E y W a a 6 _ a{ir q� L qv u t- obc+_ orn t N a s u a AX-7 v } p6ctu W y G N 9 V � W J Zrnd Y U 6r L d C N C i ate! M C7g d y6 C *A� W > U a ti � C sc14 �Dn a d Nc y'�^ �L cac° L 9 K L C D u 6 u L » R d d �yY V A q Y Crpi. R xi v W L q v ]Y L d C . 9a 2 p ° B n Gwr �3 —,tat s q`q oq�� i dv6 cz pG L,dC 9 aq ri d d p: nia '¢`ue p�rn^ 6a' Qn dz _ e2 E U 0 d do ^o. L� Nd N L qR L 71 O °�°•.° iv xr rn E tui � u ,iES o l o N D .-e r Zq Lh�ni a� sp aau rp° Ni �1 1;I � .4I p LD9 p uti 2 t Am TUp4 cly T xr�aT.D. uC da c�Y` aw�Y'p. a =q a,n -14 SC DD T CUU eNjj a q�y YL ,r..° LuCL Y ^ LN D0. w_dgd �9E d .. `a u.Q� �LdN n•• -�.cn ^ Y A ALL T c ° «yN. ty. WgQGD1 Eu «p «, p�L C ^ p a q u ',-7C d A •G r �M IS D9 1�SYyCM u d R g d� 4 d N ♦ y� A d Na axi q N 644db Y r Yv u9 Ylr RAmO Ok4 u Er-L b � a "I. X1 Xi I Fr--� S N C i ate! M C7g d y6 C *A� W > U a ti � C sc14 �Dn a d Nc y'�^ �L cac° L 9 K L C D u 6 u L » R d d vA y rn NE 0'} =. R xi v W L q L p ]Y L d C . q V C 2 p ° B n Gwr �3 —,tat s q`q oq�� i dv6 cz u� L,dC 9 aq ri d d p: nia '¢`ue p LD9 p uti 2 t Am TUp4 cly T xr�aT.D. uC da c�Y` aw�Y'p. a =q a,n -14 SC DD T CUU eNjj a q�y YL ,r..° LuCL Y ^ LN D0. w_dgd �9E d .. `a u.Q� �LdN n•• -�.cn ^ Y A ALL T c ° «yN. ty. WgQGD1 Eu «p «, p�L C ^ p a q u ',-7C d A •G r �M IS D9 1�SYyCM u d R g d� 4 d N ♦ y� A d Na axi q N 644db Y r Yv u9 Ylr RAmO Ok4 u Er-L b � a "I. X1 Xi I Fr--� S N sl d� 1• v 1� U C1 •n C S. a o L u ° vv ` 39 � ;5-4 u y O. O.p L.y !! 2 t Cw V C C`yW r dY.�V +nm N E E rn u N' c E a ^ zt u L p 6 u' D CZ .CD vnG D� .... U y 9 pLdY WL L � �i NivAi- > •y � L u } w L N ui L OaLi 6Cr-� pw q 3 a o d�Eu bn Wu " wu t p.0 3u .-. • _ C9 °LD ww' wU qa� TZ dam. q nw A +�• cu Liz= �� aY� o•c-^ c 9yd'1 °^ s Ewiim •-'^ _ r A ° voOC D a ^u \oT� j !p•• vu a'. ac Nu c WL ' «p Ea GL + of V ♦�ym 1 Oi � wO9 —23 mo C., a A. j,• ° Ci ` N° CE `+L •�'jW N D w Su ryl v GAO . y � .° D °pp�tu p _W A� i.^ N .A. C"'�W EL � L � %Lp UU: �Y as LA .+.. O� E,D `yC ALd D dA Lu Uyp U� 4 6 Oi•! U q.0�0 C u^ G 3 L a A C d 2+ N uG 6 6 u W C U q.L C 2 N6W q� 4GNU. NOuw N4 'CHI+ t � 4 V � 6 V 9 q N°• b 14 Q7 NA q O w t•1 `-• a•'r o L u ° vv ` 39 � i w41 w 2 t Cw r + 4 U r dY.�V +nm SN E E � C O y t a G ro v Any a.r e D u O 6 u' Chu+ CZ .CD vnG 2A E U y 2 r r 6 aw. Y' aLi E a } w N ui L OaLi 6Cr-� pw E .uu Ol E o C9 °LD ww' wU qa� H4 w q N u s Y _ r A E X ` C L N v y.Y•r .' E !p•• a d .- ' 6ai Nu c WL maTV uCA NOS Ea GL + of V ♦�ym 1 Oi � ti S N l•j o L u ° vv ` 39 � i EE w 2 t 2-2t.: � � t w v idu d E E � C Vim+ q n t u.' t a G ro v Any a.r e D u O 6 u' LAW dui N 0 t L:' do A 0 •" O d O ; a'^ O � C u o y • CN ppn w.3S _ ^N S� � N 'aq das N O t N�� c 6 t D• d q �W - ro E E d o Z ^S d .OrV O11. E� O N wo a _ o L a m °ov •_.� ' 24 c e A E V m A W LL ` NC • n b 6 tY•u L b L 66N q V 4r Y d^ Ok C JZ.bO p. 4 JT1 tj. 1 nU •- d o b u U tc' ` 6 n r rrl 0 C u C d ` L 0 S L u N O r L a a r ° V � L C N N L qM � C D• W d • W � •Y V r ^ H M 0 Of I G Z1. �qo r N O O N� r 1 N ZQ U cu 4 �e d �y •A a °s u E d A •- L I L N ° o L v L c u° d 4. C L C a, q O U O A O� V ^C LL CW 4•rNi VL' ..L• 4 r 4 2 N _y� •" O d O ; a'^ O � C u o y • CN ppn w.3S _ ^N S� � N 'aq das N O t N�� c 6 t D• d N d° C ro E T o Z ^S d .OrV O11. E� O N wo a _ o L a m °ov •_.� ' 24 c e A E V m A W LL ` NC • n b 6 tY•u L b L 66N q V 4r Y d^ Ok C JZ.bO p. 4 JT1 C u C d ` L 0 S L u N O r L a a r ° V � L C N N L qM � C D• W d • W � •Y V r ^ H M 0 Of I G Z1. �qo r N O O N� r 1 N ZQ U cu 4 �e d �y •A a °s u E d A •- L I L N ° o L v L c u° d 4. C L C a, q O U O A O� V ^C LL CW 4•rNi VL' ..L• 4 r 4 2 N _y� 4. CITY OF RANCHO O CUC:4, 0NGA STAFF REPORT z 0 0 F}- � U„ T DATE:. June 25, 7986 1977 TO: Planning Ctmmission FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Sensor Civil Engineer BY: Joe Sofa Jr,- Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSE5"'SMENT AND PARCEL MAP 9646 - GOLDEN A division of 4.0 Arms of an into 7--parcels in the residential designation (very 'low) located of the northeast corner Hillside Road and Moonstone Avenue (APN 1061 -r 51 -02) I. PROJECT ANDatTE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of Parcel Map B. Purpose: To divide 4.97 acres into 4 residential parcels C. Location: Northeast corner Hillside Road and Moonstone Avenue q D. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 - 3.24 Acres Parcel 2 - 23,020 SQ. FT. Parcel 3 - 23,373 SQ. FT. Parcel 4 - 28,900,SQ. FT. E. Existing Zoning; Residential (very Low) F. Existing Land Use: Vacant, except single family resident cn 10£ 1 G. Surrounding Land Use: North - ac —V ant South - Residential East - Residential West Residential PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 9646 — GOLDEN jug 'E 25, 1986 rAG- --- 2 H. Surrounding General Plan and Development Code Designations: NCrth - Residential South - Residential East - Residential West - Residential I. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant, except for parcel 1, and slopes s approximately IN, to the southeast. II. ANALYSIS: The iaurpose of this parcel crap is to divide 4.97 acres into 4 residential parcels. There is an existing residet.ce on Parcel 1. Parcels 2, 3, and 4 will be sold as custom lots for residential use. All overhead utility lines along Moonstone Avenue and Hillside Roast have previously beep undergrounded. The proposed parcel map will provide additional dedicatien for the Community Equestrian Trail along Hillside Road to be improved as each parcel develops. The proposed parcel map reg0tres the approval of a variance for lot depth, which is being presented tonight as Variance 86 -01. III. ENVIRONMENTAL. REVIEW: Also attached for your review and consideration is Part I o tree In —itial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Upon completion and review of the Initial Study and Field investigation, Staff found no adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the proposed subdivision. IV. CORRESBONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding proper y ofNners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider its a on on Variance 86 -01 and all input and elements of Tentative Parcel Map 9646. If after such consideration, the Commission can recommend approval, then the adoption of the attached Rosolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. However, if Variance 86 -01 is denied, then Tentative Parcel Map 9646 must be continued or denied. Respectfully submitted, 8RH :3S:dlw '!<�achments: Vicinity Mato Tentative Map Resolution Recommended Conditions of Approval Initial Study 0 fr, 1 I • I fs .0. .. l] .. .. O] C -7L-- ! 1 u F tt • �1 C.. 1 fj O' • � 4i v ••�T /1/ ti • f SNE se• f "26 13 • Q� ; IM ^. s ^ �NILLSIDE� .�-- �— fININAS•EAN�N1 -Sil _•i+•f �•,•., f •� ^� .� �. �. _� �- POAO^-- .F— iNttiteC CITY OF PARCEL MAP 9646 RANCHO CU CAMnNGA TITU.. VICINITY MAP FNG HWM21NfC DIVMON MIT: ' 11 A iF 1 {{ S a CL J Hit 4 F 5� �g., 4 s f cF t f f _ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCA3i0NGA P4iZT II - INITIAL STUDY r ENVIROIRIENTAL CHEMIST 0 APPLICANT:M __T_ =W1,V 8- 56,- ,t)e_u FILING DATE: i�LOG NUrffiER: d PROJECT. AgKEI : PROJECT LOLt�"sTON: I. EWIROYMENTAL I;fPACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are .required sheets) . on attached YES MAYBE NO 1. Soils nd Geola y. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? b. Disruptions_ . displacements, compaction or burial of the soil? ; c. Change in topography )i ground surfa--e contour intervals? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any potential increase in wind or water erosion of soils, affecting either on or off site conditons? f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? g. Exposure of people or property to geologic j hazards Fuch as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground fail-.ire, or similar hazards? t/! h. An increase in the rate of extraction and /or i use of any mineral resource? Z• Hydrology. Will the proposal have significant results in: ME t 4E5 No a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction Of fiowirg streams, rivers, .,c epheieral stream channels? ,g b. Changes in absorption rat:ec;...draiitiage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? ' c. Alterations to the tours- a,r flow of flood r waters? - d. `' °gnge in the amount, of surface water ir,.any body of water? v> ' e. Discharge into surface waters, or any alteration of surface water quality? f. Alteration of �-rn,-Zdwater characteristics? ` g. Change in the quannity of gTvundwaters, - either through direct additions or with - drawals, or through interference with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? f Pe. The reduction in the amount of rater other- wise available for public water supplies? i. Exposure of people o: property to water relared hazards saca as flaoding or seiches? 3. Air Quality. Will the proposal have significant results in: a Constant or p.riodit air emissions from mobile or indirect sources? r/ Stationary sources? b. DetKrioration of ar�bie:k air quality and /or interference with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? e c. Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? 4. Biots Flora. Will the proposal have significant results i.. a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or number of any species of plants? `✓ b 3educ:tion of the numbers of any un -que, rare sr endangered species of plants? s �t� +o c. Introduction of nev or disruptive species of" ' plants into an area? v ' d. Reduction in the Mtential for agricultural I production? �� Fnuna. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, e including diversity, distribution, or numbers of any species of animals? V }� b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration br movement of animals? d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or wildlife habitat? r Population. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, diversity, or growth rata of the human population of an area? 4 / b. Will the proposal affect eris-ing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 6. Socio- Economic Factors. WV 1 the -proposal have significan' _E9Snits in-, a. Change in local or regional socio- economic characteristics; including economic or commercial d.versity, tax r'ate, and property values? b. Will project costs be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax payers or project users? ✓+ 7. Land Use and Planning Consider-tions. Will the propot ,il have significant results in? a. A sulstanti.al alteration of the present or .planned land use of an area? L/ b. A )nflict with any designations, objectives, .icies, or adopted plans of any governmertal Catities? c. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of existing consumptive or non - consumptive recreational opportunities? 4i YES" `-l"M S0 8. iransoortation. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for new street construction? c. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? d. Substantial impact upon existing transporta- tion systems? e. Alteraticns to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of people and /or goods? (/ f. Alterations to or effects on present and potential water- borne, rail, mass transit or air traffic? g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? ✓'� 9. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have si,gnf.ficant results in: a. A disturbance to the integrity of aredaeological, paleontological., and /or historical resources? _✓ 10. Health. Safety, and Nuisance Factors. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potentie. 1,eaith hazard? b. Exposure of people to potential health-hazards? +l c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances ivk the event of an accident? — _ d. An increase in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms ox the exposur�i of people to such organisms? e. Increase i% existing noise levels? L% f. Exposure of pecple to potentially dangerous noise levels? g. The creation cf obi: +ctionable odors3 r h. • An increase in light or glare? �/ 4. F �.- fl. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant � results in: a. The obstruction or degradation -of any scenic vista or view? b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site? c, A conflict with the objective of designated or potential scenic corridors? / c! 12. ariiitiPS ^and Public Services. Will the proposal have a significant need for nea systems, or alterations to the following: a. Electt:?c power? I b. Natural or packaged gas? c. Communications yyscems? d. Water supply? a ??astewater facilities? f f. Flood control stru,tures? g. 5ulid wasta 'fa; ilitaes? h. Fire protection? i. Potiae protection? _ J. Schools? k. Parks of other recreational 2,zilitier? 1. Maintenance of public facilities, Including roads aad flood control facilities? m. Other governmental service;? _ 13. _Energy and Scarce P:.Sources. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Use of substantial or excessive fuc� or energy? / V b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing J sources of energy? c. An increase in the demand for devexopmtnt of new sources cl energy? d.. - An increase or perpetuation of the consumption of non - renewable folMs of energy, when feasible O renewable sources of energy are available? —9 - — �✓ a is C� �u V.N �Q Rq • �Y OqU y�. P. @ Yu q IC1F r� 06 >n L Z^ 4.. - n.�gP'Y p... Ig L.E ,NNQ Y, FOO Y >'4si CLAuL FaNd LL R C a O aE aoy 00 Ym p �iC 4�'i WI %O. N.0 S aE ti O•+. p. cam VN.VC =yr .EEV ya6 uC ep�m 9N'S�al •.O�U qo6 4_ .:. Y.,. ��n 3... COd LwO..�RL. �. y•� L.��LO LO C.MT,. gE p ^y y QO R L Y. a Y o n• 9 _ _ al- C L° L Y 'LU6 u PA N GNU O ER!O N o F L' v y W . a qu VM 4i' un a+ iN E O Q O N W a T D O I� b C.l V � D O Z V H 0 � °d.A Ttt 00 EU � \�1V. 4. NY i 6..•NR� � � Y 3 0.• Or G.t n' wL f..�C • d C .o° V �N'xQ��YOL Ot n C z� s \V p At ss (�'t' u • � "fie` ° � O ` L M71 12 12 ut .. 1� Y � �" J .y N t•1 R � .. QJ h Jv � C L 9 �yy O A Q O N U O 3 ^b^ L c TLS N b c nC in BOG � i A 12 C V c L L r.�b. NAGGn N N + U rQ^ -i'Ey0 w � y wu^ .viu Y CO9� ��OFiOLL at c E� Dn V q 3 q4 A G L U~ c E a E � N • C q O N d� r 42 d Tq M cO.e �i u rn E Ui d.Q d N 'C6�E f .+�Y N C A 1E •. A.4 A q, y ` r.. CV �3,c,.: i0oq �a nb b�q N�3 Uq � e0 �. n Ly TRtq L v y OO q. E � ° A �� arn� Air E Uq wco e� '^ �L - as L q i Oq ^? yU0 GC q` b C c Crc �wc O b A >d Ot LOLL XY. PTUn u r• L' N CL�. do c E R .-LL• C Oa W � Yi. E `ui cOi Ub N L CcL aU �U yN0 b1 Q"EL V y€ � Erie 9U 9U L N Q u E l L A D•u. p a L � O O Y .G cn a• 7;X, C+ PiAbac E��a UA� c UY p �c - Nc ay ' 41 r A d Y O C� r V ; c C•> Y L yY b{ N3 �q Q b G A TC 79 b�O�=c uUr� Nye yT �.E Aw i4 ° �Arr�^ ' T CtJW YC O yT mom •�+7 QCR UG GN ENV VL�A'Na. r i w V Nb4..H a P Y [J d. .... i Q ^� °. • i.. � 6 U Y M .. Gam_ q 9gnic�i YM r EL..'i°c Lb cdi._9 c mom- .. u E w d i 3° 3 A 0-2 vQ MF- ' ev A E a 6 E d. 6 ¢ u d+• HIj4 N .+ N N {• 2 2 rLir N Y .S y r2i. N Y. M R. U W .. x. 6` c 6 L q urp N 6 G Jv � C L 9 �yy O A Q O N U O 3 ^b^ L c TLS N b c nC in BOG � i A 12 C V c L L r.�b. NAGGn N N + U rQ^ -i'Ey0 w � y wu^ .viu Y CO9� ��OFiOLL at c E� Dn V q 3 q4 A G L U~ c E a E � N • C q O N d� r 42 d Tq M cO.e �i u rn E Ui d.Q d N 'C6�E f .+�Y N C A 1E •. A.4 A q, y ` r.. CV �3,c,.: i0oq �a nb b�q N�3 Uq � e0 �. n Ly TRtq L v y OO q. E � ° A �� arn� Air E Uq wco e� '^ �L - as L q i Oq ^? yU0 GC q` b C c Crc �wc O b A >d Ot LOLL XY. PTUn u r• L' N CL�. do c E R .-LL• C Oa W � Yi. E vd cOi Ub N L CcL aU �U yN0 b1 Q"EL V y€ � Erie 9U 9U L N Q u E l L A D•u. p a L � O O Y .G cn a• -a)q Jv � C L 9 �yy O A Q O N U O 3 ^b^ L c TLS N b c nC in BOG � i A 12 C V c L L r.�b. NAGGn N N + U rQ^ -i'Ey0 w � y wu^ .viu Y CO9� ��OFiOLL at c E� Dn V q 3 q4 A G L U~ c E a E � N • C q O N d� r 42 d Tq M cO.e �i u rn E Ui d.Q d N 'C6�E f .+�Y N C A 1E •. A.4 A q, y ` r.. CV �. �. E LpC 4N NN q^ �L u Y F ^O:d mj AO k ° �.. H ma s.f9lvpn a .Z71 q t > N d U u y a u a A c qu Oi N 6O. AdwO p6 Llqu r Cl� � E K OaC..o r ut Gc qdu �A.dOp L� }Y U 'y... p.�NV. Y .v Qi GN d L y O. ° uM h• G .i �� y E Vw d ^9 E Cdb N rq. N' QNr Q.c 3 N 4Nll i -�.qa. OeN c \-` U Qq� `i. Qp LL.O d VY U U c L <6 o c me C e T O•. � O E' O Ulr nqV" W U EU C 09gAa AC Nni. Q L ; qd as A. ^ = N QVq LQ�Q9L O N~ u N OY�. �U rr0 O L9 uww 4w a. y-N U n. `y pee0 On nn6 y, o °pL,2 ��� V Y G Yii V N CY Rl Y d C A LN d p > ^N � � � Y = �O aC EO V ^�...J • aLibC �r �Or JY S)U => d -.y4° L�.O y•01 uL Eu ud N it; .Y O r T ^1L TdQA. T � EN •C .N G � �� q A w q 4 �, 2 n C q r' p w G E CEGE Q C Y .1.5 w Y4 T •raL •� d ..-.O 9dN ^ Ca ^t EY .. 8.. .c • �aT+ .-a mLaL 9. >C O °O NE[; s' \51 t QM n0��2 Ry-0 � 6'O Y. X61 Qfi..•fi9 l^pr c,j RC.6,CA 6A W0. CUMCO 7!r`" I -Y-7 12 E-. ivi zz; Om z g S .�E 9 113 .2 4 M I B; gi z g - Z�l E �E -79 ova 1 7; 2 . - E u4 a% g m o 6 -9 r J- r; Ile l g dCN .1 w - v aa,; Na J Et nu I Vl 7!r`" I -Y-7 12 E-. ivi zz; Om z g gi -79 ova t Z 7 g m o r J- r; Ile l dCN .1 w - > J Aft N 4� ' uV. so o� w ' b 6 .IE qti aQ dab1 ri 6 �• ° b O = n a y �.o'a'u �[n uoa o w N � a c a- r o° •O O .. F CV°.. ° ° � a. HOsW I N UeV qA ° bys - J ' C P .Oi'• F� cY y ul2•.^ O '� L <'" � ; � E E �.O � p ° z A T Z G O S N Cy �.[ ry �.� y - •Q Avg. �N E L IQ Q4d1 L A YdUL:' mod. E.wq y0�. Ndy9?'C -, __ do pu rfE d` T p.:o -1 . .^ y ny Y°. Aft N 4� ' uV. uH. b 6 .IE qti aQ � �- a N E ! u= d ri C a n• S O = n a y �.o'a'u �[n uoa o '• Aso a c a- r o° •O O .. CV°.. � a. HOsW I N UeV qA ° bys - J -E Qb p _Npo nr L A�nn =pC 6 45 ry �.� y TT aU LC F Aw.. A9 CU�� V Yq `° v a .app +L ° � T6 pa E.wq y0�. Ndy9?'C -, __ do pu rfE d` T p.:o -1 . .^ y ny Y°. 16p G9N GA np N L N C Ld _ A7 O O � � Wy �O LL ' ' Up • 4 A NL O A 9 17 C �° u p Ly V Z �. G L t01 O `.6 u 6 C9 9 d A 6 d 01 .Fay O u W G H-, V y C ` yr• • d O F y U A n� O� C .C. dpyL C O A 0..°. Y ° n Y '2'A S a L b •.- 0• it Oa O Zq � EU� A y t; E.3"! O.N A Ol u E d AY H d ° C ,� T L O 11,6 O. L 6Y p Gy qY • O T V 6 z� nd OrCV pT�asa �G � P L O 1ALa41+ C NAC D6 EY .. ... u =ai L7 L� V. z" b ". e:ubstanriai depletion -of az� nonrenewable-or y scarce •natural. resource? 14. `fand< tore F zsdins s of gign ficance. xj� Does the project have the potential to degrade �I the 9u4,40w of;sthe environment, substantially, it reduce t6 habitat of fish or wi dSife s'peeies, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number o'r restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major nesiods of California history or prehistory? t/ ` b. Does the projecE have the rotential to achieve short -term; to the disadvantage of long -term, environmental goals? ' (A: short-term impacr on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively` brief, definittta Aye iod of tine while long- 'endure term impacts wiii= well into the future), L. Does the project have impacts which are ' 3.11dividuallylimited, but cumulativelr--, considerable? (Cumulatively considerable i" means that tae incremental, effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection With the effects of past projects, and probable future projects); JZ d. Dogs the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or iudirectly? 11. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (i.e., of affirmative answers to the above questions plus a discussion of propo;,ed mitigation measures), sa On the hssis: of this initial evaluation: I find the proposed project Co1;LD NOT have a significant effect` nn the environment, ' anal a VkCATIVE DECLARATVOA will be prepared. ' I find that although the pru?osed project could have a zLgraificant effect OF the envirorueat, there will:'not be a si n this case bec ttse the mitigation q i i fican,t effect measures described Gi.1 an attached rheet have been added to the project, A NEGATIVE DECLARATZoji-"WILL SE PRFPARM. I find the proposed project MAY have 'a significant effect Gn the envirnmentr and an ENI., ZZMT IMPACT REPORT is required. Date nignatur �r '-"tiC R ,ti Iw 711 U RESOLUTION <NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF 74. CIIY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, , CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY` APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 9646 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 9646 submitted by.-,Dr. Irwin B. Goidcn applicant, fcr the purpose of suksdividing into 4 parcels, the real property situated in the City of E -incho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, identified APN(s) 1061 - 251 -02, located northeast corner Hillside Road and Moonstone Avenue -, and _ WHEREAS, on JurL 25, 1986 the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above - described map. a 9 WHEREAS, on rune 25,1986 t.ie Planning Commission approved Variance 86 -01. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FO.LOWS SECTION 1: That t'le following findings have ber-n made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improl,ement o. the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. Thae the site is .physically suitable for the proposed.development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will rat cause substantial environmental damage, pv is health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property and a Negative Declaration is fissured. SECTION 2: Tentative Parcel Marx No. 964E is hereby approved subj:ct to the attached Standard Coedition<> and the foiloaing Special Conditions, - SPECIAL CONDITIONS: T. Parcel 2 shil provide driveway access from Moonstone Avenue. 2. On -site grading and drainage structure along the southern portion of Parcel i shall be completed to the satisfaction of building and Safety Division prior to recordation. 3. An Offer of Dedication for drainage purpa -Ls as determined by the City Engineer shall be delineated on the Final Map prior to recordation. 4. Local and Master Planned Trails shall be provided in accordance with the Trail Plan. A detailed Trail Plan in accordance with the Citv Trail Standards strall be s!abmitted and approved by the City Planner prier to recordation. Y �# y a k APPROVED ANO''AOQPTED THIS 25th DAY OF JUNE,` 1986 AML E PLANNING COMMISSION bF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. )TOUT, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, eputy ecretary t, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Corn iasico of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning C ^m1.is!;ioli of th City of Rancho Cucamonga,, at a regular meeting of the Planning Ko* ssion held on the 25th day of June, 1986 by the following vote- to -w:t: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: i NOES: COMMISSIONERS: J ABSENT COMMISSIONERS: r r i C a Q G C G w Y � E u.- C1i Y 6 13 Z s u tL o g x F ti o� u 0 o u Lt. oil LA - r � no. N � V N O ✓ R L ✓ ��u 7c .°. e'L' st U _.l V R Y'C' Y� 0o � I Lqpq � 9g ^L AR a 4✓ N c � W CCaV A? 42L LO �° �A^ w L >u Up.�. Hal .,RO A Y �� O L N =. A q N .W C C � ✓C yr' aj A"' r y 6. N C .,. c n ✓+ >1 C C 6 H .�.^..J L ^�✓ 9d Di+ L�•� A �'L''++ s V Y N u.NU W Y 4 i 6'p u4 OI l in O' GO L 9. _ w V�cv wwy. �`.n v1u: ova Nia N� 1p Y V. n�- `qa �•^iY rn�M y.L1 � y✓ N v 1.°..q �' O4L 4 � O V Y v✓i in u.� «� CC4 m-Z y O 93- L V A y V K A w a[ d L a W fig V^ I .o-. ... LA - r � no. 4 L ✓ ��u 7c .°. e'L' st p _.l Y'C' 0o aV W I Lqpq ✓' � W CCaV A? 42L LO ^Y � � Y Y@i� ♦..Y NR A"' r y Ns ✓+ L�•� A �'L''++ s V Y 0 .Yp �` d `. ✓ o Y ^ V 4 i 6'p u4 A. N i` p S l _ w V.. � .' •s � O. ° O q° i 4 N� f.l �' Y V. 6 °1 ✓� A g ° � �•^iY rn�M y.L1 � y✓ N v 1.°..q �' O4L 4 � O V Y V S y O 93- L V A y V K A w a[ d L a W fig V^ N V E6E6E6j +fllllllll cd R=EV C— O uV r r'ou 9 W N L Os i. C'St GCC d 9� } ReT O •4 L ^ y h v9 M O °w ads u� N RO L�L.0 �MO GO hYL 6 —f,. 4Y7 SOi • Y VN� y n .••O • L O N Y �O �O �` r4 G rYU • O .'a (_1 a u �C NO N d4 vR LIO i . �L to L YW Y0 Q V YOpB NL �Y Lw y0y o c N P. Oy r _ Y. O °cd Q CwL • R a�i O C� NZ aw N•c u LL bo w N CL 4 `4.Y U 1�)W V♦� L Cd w. y— i, ti M4 �. CS y C. Y _R °q'L^ u. v .'• v > ° dy $ 0 1=n d �� 4]e Y ° ,.. —uo " •+app.°i a u9 ,� 4� �` •- .-.E �. t Y °~ a d. wm'v C�°a`d a2u° Auk O i• IA L CI°i` ' OF R,A XHO CUCAMOI,TGA STAFF REPO RT DA PE: June 5, 1986 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Howard F'eids, Assistant Planner SUBJFCT: VARIANCE 86 -01 - GOLDEN - A request to reduce the minimum; 1ct" depth from 0 feet to 136 feet on a. proposed 20,195` sq ft. parcel in the Very Low Residential District (up to 2 du /arl, located at the northeast corner of Hillside and Moonstone -- APN 1061- 25 -02. RELATED FILE: PHRCEL MAP 9646 I. BACKGROUND: The owner proposes to subdivida his property into four parcels. Three parcels fronting on Hillside for future residential development. The exiting residence on the remai, ring parcel will be retained by the - swner. As required for t)e subdivision of residential property, the Development Code (Section 17,08.040 -B) specifies that minimum lot depth shall be 150 feet within the Very Low Residential District, and is measured as the horizontal distance between the midpoint of the front lot line and the midpoint of the rear lot line. The owner is requesting a variance on this aspect of the prcposed subdivision. II. ANALYSIS: The City, per the' - Master Plan of trails, is ,�iquiring a 20 foot offer of dedication, 11' for parkway and 9' for equestrian easement along Hillside as a condition of fie related ParCEl Map - 646. This dedication, with the minimum lol; depth will place the rear lot line of parcel 3 within 25 feet of the existing residence (see Exhibit "D "). The applicant desires t increase their separation from the newly created lots beyond 29 feet and propo es that this separation be increased an additional 14 feet. TFa Development Code reg0res tP.;t the Planning Commission make :.ertain findings before a Variance can be granted. Based on the -following facts, staff believes there is insufficient justification to make the necessary f- .ndings of approval: o The required 15C, foot minimum parcel depth can be achieved, as shown in Exhibit "D", o The creation of a su':standard lot results from the self- imposed actions of the owner, not strict inter - pretation ITEM G PLANNING GOMMSSYM STAFF REPORT Variance 86 -01 - Golden Jone 25, 1986 Page 2 of the Development Code or physical limitations of ti?e property.. The 20 foot offer of dedicatiot for parkway and trail purposes is required as a condition of parcel map approval. The situation can be solved by adjusting the northerly boundary to achieve minimum lot depth of 150 feet. o Existing lots of record for surrounding properties confirm to or e=eed the minimum lot depth of 150 fo.',t. o There are ro exceptional or extraordinary circvms'�Ances or conditions applicable to the parcels involved, or substantial evidence. provided that would necessitate a Variance. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Before granting a Variance, the Planning Co- a-wAssion shall make the following findings that the circumstances prescribed below do apply: 1. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical di ficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inccnsistenk with the objectives of the Development- Code. 2. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. 3. That strict or literal interpretation and enfor:ement of he specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. - 4. That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special priv`iege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. 5. That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public nearing item in The Daily Renort newspaper, the property posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the subject property. lil El f,ANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT r, 4, vdriartce 8 -Ol "- Golden , June 25, 19$6 Page 3 r' V. RECOMM_ E�NpATIO�I_ It is recommender that tine 'Plannir'�j Commissioner . cpnduct a public hearing to consider public input and eleme,!,ts of _ k this project. If after such consideration the Commission_;tannat support the required findings, ;-then adoption of `the attached Resolution of j nial would ,be appropriate. E Res ftcl,ty a •.witted % f Bra uller City Planner K: HE:ns Attachments: Letter from Applicant Exhibit "A" — Location Map Exhibit "S" AY,ea Map Exhibit "Cn RarceT`Map ' Exhibit !'P" Staff Alternate Resolutioi of Denial w• Y IPWIN Q. GGLUEN, D.D.S. GREC.ORV S. GOLDEN, D.D.S. TELEPHONE (714) 982.1549 77 J AST SEVENTH STREET 0 UPLAND, CALIFORNIA 91766 1986, March 6 THE PLMING. COMM SSIM City. of Rancho Cucamonga 9'27 Baseline Road :rancho Cucamonga, CA 9173^ Re: Tentative Parcel Map Na. 9646 anct variance Centlemen: This is a request for a Variance to accompany the Parcel Subdivision of the five acres which is now c,ur homesite. (Tentative Parcel Map No. 96461 :)hen we built our home in Alta Luna thirty years ago, we were in the country, with only one other residence within a half mile radius. Subdivision in tUs area had not begun and was certainly not in our plans. Now t" picture has changed, along with !-he tha local government, the ordinances and tlw, populatinn. we are told t.e current lot size requirements are 150 ft. minimum depth, along with other specifications. Of the threr. lots we are proposing to cut out of car five acres, while retaining our homesite, it turns out that one does not meet the lut depth requirement. In the accompanying aerial photo, with overlay attached, it may be seen that- fu'J lot depth on Parcel C would result in a mr,Jor, latrusion on the 'Orivacy of our home along with destruction of Fence, vines, `_ees, plants, bushes and several small uti.lit„ buildings. A n.ore detailed desc.•. -.3tion of the loss is provided elsewhere in this letter, At the suggestion of the Planning Commmissi on Staff, we have reviewed Par. E of Sec. 17.04 040 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Code. Eased on the data wp have and the informatioii supplied herewith the variance we are re.Zuesting seems justified by the Cnae cited above. sub -,:- - ( _) Practical difficulty. Rn '. enforcement of the regulation requiring 150' lot depth would result in eneroa^hment on the property that has been :ur f -amily residence for 29 years. It would re:ault in the . Alowing loss. 170 ft. of chain link fence. Grape vines and boysenberry vines suppdrted by �- fence. A small hot- house. A 10 x 10 ft. stor�,e shed on a concrete slab. A wood-on structure housing four bird cages. Two avocado trees, 1 Halnut tree, 1 fig tree and 1 nactarire tree. A section of Viburnua hedge 8' high and 201 long, C -14 i ... � • e o w ins •� .. ...9 - •B- u 4 tlY ' r yV • ® Y •8 S'a 6F '4 QD 1 ® •« w• s. �i ci) if !L '• i I $ sT C Rio 4 4 & •9. �. d . + • . e . • • • . • �r e. • . •. • . w .�,.•�� \ �,✓ ,,a , � s X17. /, J. , � �� ^�. 43 � � r e .• o d R O °' •o 9 4 9 Vr TE'NrJtY(4�1 �. 4. w. ..r w �a e- V �• ;6l2 .g D 9.� s.9{@. o. . • Qt Aft a 9 0 t i tl9 � ioo ° ° • �f • 800 RADIUS MAP FOR TF.NfA'i7VE • _� • j. PARCEL. MAP NO. 954d No X H CITY OF PL.AINR U\U Divb- -m F NIBTT• •• SCALE- 'i __. m tee' l `•� \ •�.� �� � � a /� `�4•' � yr. �,�t i \ \ \\ 1� > 1. -�•~ ''r!•p- 7A4GEL 1 , 1, , \f� 1� •. � �w-. «a lla wan.n � \ 4 LJNT X(� .a }:'a} •LIT IK,►«� —. KI. Wi i � � IJ i -�• —� MKTATIVE 9�19CEL •?AAP _ h`�� �13E�•� 1p1'�I � r�L.: - _ '_` N° 9546 JT.. y -..�, o ,........ . M-4i t- .r"CT C4 Al v • 420¢ .u{ n %\ C.PjU.iLVu T ULv. 10. MQ O la1 T '•. - "" V . i L 0=o Pau 'fs.t7A G trRl wun.w a..4q_ 'i: NORTH a H CrrY O rr tit: " cz3 11 At4ea..0 v�- \:11, �NOOKI I' • ' d �W I ! <..er p�ory s.f t ! a�n kcl =L. 2 ,d. s �s6• I t ; f L ARCH \ 110. P[6rxFr ' -� igj1j "PC W,44a ff' -1r. aver Ana, ni, u� ucr •lO�YIOWKCR v,l M7.T tMr TEPdiATIVE PARCEL'• MAP 13� W 9646 �w..,.,.,.. .,..o ....e� A�w, w w �(1l/�,+dTi2✓.O�.0 �Ri� /l • T ►dx.w7�aef. 6401.4 Ax" 4,�i'11a 4�.•d'74.'f �47f� .. gar 04ekKA Nb'C(RWl.'Tt�U 4Ga� AqK CN:GjTeutl •1b11.Nt .10: A4Mi f! I� 'rout- aowrrou :t�ac.A.vr NMTH CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM(DiNGA Tnull PLANNING D MMSSM E%HIBITt RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANChf/ CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION DENYING' VARIANCE NO. 86 -01 TO REDUCE MINIMUM LOT DEPTH FROM 150' TO 1361 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED Oil THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HILLSIDE ROAD & MOONSTONE AVENUE IN THE VERY LOW DISTRICT (UP TO 2 OU /AC) WHEREAS, on the 29th day of January, 1486, an application was filed and accepted on the above- drsSribed project; and WHEREAS, on the 25th ddy of June, 1986, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearii..i pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECT ION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findir�gsi 1. The application applies to a 4.97 acre parcel in the Very ow Rr,'iiential District (up to, 2 du /ac ), located on 014 northeast corner of Hillside Rnad'and Moonstone Avenue, 2 The surrounding u:::;serties are also located ''gin the Very Low Residential District (up to 2 i!u /wi). and are developed with single - family residences. 3. The proposed creation if substandard lots results from the self- imposed actions of the owner, not strict interpretation of the Development Code or physical limitations of the property. The situation can be solved by adjusting the northerly boundary to achieve minimum lot depth of 150 feet. 4. Existing lots' of record for sun )unding properties and neighborhood all conforms to or exceeds the minimum lot depth, of 150 feet. 5. There are no exceptional conditions applicable to the parcels involvzit,, or substantial evidence provided that would justify a variance. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission cannot make the following findings: 1. That strict "or literal interpretation- and enforcement of the specified Pagination would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical'' hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Cade. Ka 3 BY: Dennis t. Stout, Chairman --- AT'i EST- • Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held J on the-25th day of June, 1986, by the following vote -to -wit AYES: COMMISSIONERS; NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: i � j Resoluticn No.- Vaviance 86 -01 '- Golden i Junk 25, 1986 Page 2 d 2.. That there are exceptional, or extraordinary circumstances or conditions appliicablf; to the Property involvc,d or to the intended use of the r_ property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. 3. That strict or literal interpretation and C enforcement of the specified regulation would daprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of Other properties in than same district.- - 4. That the granting of the V;r,riance w,'J1 not I e constitute a errant of special pri+ilrge lr�cnnsistent with the lifaitations on other Piixlerties classified in the same district. 5. That the granting of the Variaive will not be detrimental to the pubic: henith Safety, or welfare, or materially 7nju;iaus to properties or improvem6nts in the viciv ty„ CT ION ..� crCTION 3: Baser upon the findings and cnnclusion; set forth above, this Commission hereby denies Varia,xe 86.01. a APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF JUNE, 1986, JJi PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO GUCAMONGA 1 BY: Dennis t. Stout, Chairman --- AT'i EST- • Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held J on the-25th day of June, 1986, by the following vote -to -wit AYES: COMMISSIONERS; NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: i � j ;ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ) VK`O GL�MO,y�9 3 2' i cs �-4 ter C!: C 'r' A L • .Z �t DATE: June 25, 1986 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Warren, Associate Planner SUBJECT:. REVISIONS TO THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN I. ABSTRACT: The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing to consider the Environmental Assessment and approval of revisions to the Industrial Area Specific Plan (I.S.P.). This report sur:..aarizes the revisions which have been made to the I.S.P. and recommends approval of the revised document. A Negative Declaration for the project is also recommended. II, BACKGROUND: This public hearing is the zulmination of a series of recent Planning Commission workshops (Aa2ust 1985, through 1986). At these workshops, the Planrinq staff was provided specific policy direction by the Planning Commission in the areas of land use, subarea boundary modification, and Specific Plan structure and topic emphasis. Topics I already discussed at the workshops which have been incorporated into various sections of the draft plan aire as follows: A. Modification of the nail SP•rvice Standards in which the Commission's direction encouraged a policy of mandatory development for potential rail service use of all property (except those in industrial Park, sections) which abut lead /spur rail lines. B. Expansion of Subarea 8 (General Industrial) into portions of Subarea 9 Minimum Impact /Heavy Industrial) between Subarea 6 and future Milliken Avenue to allow for expansion of lighter in General Industrial use along Arrow Highway. Expansion of Subarea 6 (Industrial Park) to Utica avenue is also recommended with this area issue. - C. Minor Expansion of Subarea 8 southerly into portions of Subarea 15 JHeavy Industrial) to improve the light industrial development potential along Etiwanda Avenue. ITEM H i i i I I :I •l al 1 3 ap ' " PLANNING COMMISSION STAFV REPORT " REVISIOt;S TO THE L.S.F. June 25 485 Page 2 D. Stre,ythened Land Use 'transition Standards for those Industrial Areas adjacent to Residential Districts was encouraged by the Planning Commission. New Standards drafted by stiff are contained in the Special Considerations of each Subarea in which this condition exists. E. Restructured Goals and Objectives (Part II, Section I) and the Urban Design Concept (Part II, Section 11) have been drafted �4' and amended pursuant to Commission direction. As already noted, all of these items have been discussed during the workshop phase of this process. The Commisseion wi'l now need to hold a public hearing on these issues. to obtain additional input. II. NEW ITEMS: In addi•,,ion to the issues already discussed, two new items of significance are proposed at this time, to deal with parking ratios and the Chamber of Commerce recormmendation on land use around the I -15 freeway. These two items are outiined below for the Commission's consideration. A. Parking Ratios: Staff is recommending a variation in the method of calculating parking ratios bar A upon individual activity uses within a structure and a graduated ratio for t parking assigned fur warehouse space as follows: 1. Rather that computing the parking ratio based upon the majority use of the building, the tof:al count shall be determined by the summation of individual use demands within the building. An example of how this method work is sh <jwn on Exhibit "1" of this report. 2, A parking ratio for R• ear " nd Development Uses at + one space per 350 square feet is now included. 3. The warehousing ratio has been modified to allow for a decreasing in parking requirement as the area of the warehouse space increases. This type of ratio acknowledges a greater efficiency of employee requirements as the warehousing space enlarges. 4. A trailer parking requirement of one stall per truck loading dock door has been added to reflect the need for such parking on large distribution centers f PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT REVISION: TO THE I.S.P. June 25, 1986 Page 3 jI A E] �J B. Land Use Alo g I -15: The Economic Development Committee of the the Chamber of Commerce has expressed extensive interust in the development of revised uses for the land presently in Subarea 9 and adjacent to the I -15 freeway (as described in the attached June 9, 1986 report by the Chamber) . The Chamber, recommendation proposes that the development potential of the area would be enhanced by expanding permitted uses to include those General industrial uses not now authorized in the Heavy Industrial Subar'-,Is. This would also allow the construction of higher quality structures along the I -15 Freeway. The Chamber has further recommended that the expansion of Subareas 9 and 14 (General Industrial) alc�nq the 1-15 freeway in place of the Heavy Industrial Districts as an alternate means of -.,complishing the expansion of General Industrial uses along the 1 -15 freeway. This is illustrat6d in Exhibit "II% The Planning Commission recommended approval of a similar proposal in 1985. 9owc-ver, the City Council was concerned with potential land use conflicts between existing Heavy and future Light Industrial developments, and determined such a change was inappropriate at the time. It has been suggested that a development agreement between property owners and the City could help mitigate potential use conflicts. Staff is currently working on the agreements and prior to City Council action on the ISP, an acceptable agreement could be available to satisfy the concerns with land use conflicts. If the Commission desires, land use modifications as shown in Exhibit "II" can be incorporated into the draft I.S.P. text, conditioned upon to successful resolution of -the land use conflict issue "trough a development agreement prior to adoption of the changes, IV. COMPREHENSIVE SUMMARY OF REVISIONS: This section is intended to provide in one place an :overall summary of the proposed changes, particularly for those not closely involves; in the public workshop phase of this project.. In August, 1981, the City Council adopted the Industrial Area Specific Plan (TSPwt. The Plan details goals with regulatory standards for development in the Industrial Area; it implements the General Plan. Local government is impowered by the authority of Section 65450 of the California Government Code to adopt the Specific Plans for the entire area. It is the objective the Specific Plan to draw together all necessary and appropriate regulations for the development of an bntire area through both guidelines and standards. N -3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT REVISIONS TO THE- I.S.P.. a June 25, 1986 Page 4 p, Since this Specific Plan's adoption, land use designations and City ordinances have been revised. These include the Haven and Master 'tan Overlay Districts, Parking Requirements, Sign Ordinance, Temporary US °_s, Median Island Location and Land Use Amendments, As a result, administrative revisions to the Plan and reprinting are necessary. At the same time, the Planning Commission determined that it would be appropriate to refine and adjust certain sections, such as Land Use, Technical and DeC`Iy. Standards, and Special Standards Considerations within the rubllreai -- The revisions to the Plan includes statistical updates tolIPart I (Regional and Corsmunity Background), Part 1I (Industrial Area Development Framework), Part iI (Development Standards - and Guidelines), Part IV (Subirea Development Standards), Part V (ImpTE;nentation Program) and the Appendix. This report provides an out,1ne of the areas to be updated, and brief discussion of the Sin:ca this draft document was forwarded to the Planning Commis ?::r. for review, staf has noted the need for certain housekeeping changes to the texk, These changes are noted on attached corrected pageas w.th tfit changes highlighted. These pages should be inserted in your draft document for formal consideration in the public hearings. The following is a brief outli ve of proposed changes, chapter by chapter: I.S.P. PART I - REGIONAL AND COMMUNITY. BACKGROUND: Revisions include updates of outdated statisticrf data and similar minor modifications. I.S.P. PART II: - Industrial Area Development f=ramework: Thin section of `the Industrial Specific Plan provides background information regarding topics such as traffic and circulation, flood management, urban desigr, concepts, and public services. The scope of revisions basically includes updating of this information. Highlights of the changes tf' this part include the following: A. An expanded goals and' objective statement which places increased emphasis on design iss_,es. B. A re- organized development framework which places a rewritten urban design concept immediately after the Goals and Objective Statements. it is-part of the Land Use Plans section. A Rail Service - General Industrial group has been elminated to reflect modified Rail Service Development Standards. D EA 0 PLANNING CMD4ISSION STAFF REPORT REVISION -. TO THE I.S.P. June 25, 1966 Page 5 C. The Circu)ation and Access Policies have been updated to reflect recent changes and study progruis and policies (median island locations, right -of -spay width, etc.). PART III - Development Standards and Guidelines: This section provides land use def�nrtTons which allow fexibility to categorize a use based or, operating characteristics in conjunction with performance standards (such as noise, air contaminates, odor, and glare). Certain definitions, however, needed to be more clearly distinguished and defined such as the manufacturing uses, liht and heavy- wholesale, storage and distribution. definitions which have been modified automotive yenta Uleasing, business support services, fast food sales, and a flood control, utility corridor land use definition has been added. The intent is to rep' `e the ambiguity of certain definitions and in turn reflect c ant policies regarding operational characteristics . r..initions have also been added for the new Research & Development ese categories. Revisions to the Development Standards and Gui0elines are intender to clarify design and technical requirements currently in practice. The areas to be revised include the following: A. Architectural Designs Standards have been strengthened and. the metal buildings prohibition has been included in the General Industrial land Use Category. B. Development Standards of the Haven Overlay District have been incorporated into this Section. C. Equipment screening requirements have been expanded to include provisions for. wall - mounted equipment and satellite dish antennas, D. The Par•xing Space Requirements have been modified as prcviousiy' noted, E. One of the nost significant changes is the modification to the Rail Service Standards. The changes propose that all properties which abut an existing or proposed lead /spur rail line be required to develop to standards which will enable the use of the line by businesses dependent on rail service. Tt is further proposed that the Rail Service /General Industrial Category be deleted and that the Rail Service Requirr°2nt be applied to all properties in the ISP, except for tho: in the Industrial Park Category. This concept would provide a rail service policy which would effectively make use of existing rail service potential. { PLANNING COMMTSSIGN STAFF REPORT REVISIO�1S TO THE' I.S.P. June 25, i986 Page 6 The Chamber of Commerce has concluded, in its separate analysis of the Industrial Area- that it is not possible to provide rail service to major porticns of Subarea 9, south of Arrow Highway. Staff would agree that it would be difficult to 13y track to properties adjacent to the freeway embankments. The proposed rail lines for Subarea 9 (as indicated on the Subarea Map) aria possible a, determined by railroad engineering analysis. F. Other modification to this Section includes Master Plan Requirements (where necessary for integrated development of the 1. "en Overlay District), Maintenance Provisions (buildings, landscaping, parking and loading areas), outdoor storage of vehicles and security fences and wails. I.S.P. Part IV Overlay District: and Subarea Development Standards: Revisions to the Subareas for the most part involve addition of the haven Overlay District, fine - tuning of uses, clarification of special considerations and graphic updates. Subarea boundary changes include the following: A. The mo:,,t significant change proposed is the modification of Subarea 9 (Minimum Impact /Heavy Industrial). If approved, the following changes would take place: 1. Subarea 8 (General Industrial) would extend south of Arrow Highe;ay between Subarea 6 on the west and the future Milliken Road on the east. This extension would border the north side of New Jersey Avenue between Utica and Vincent and would abut the rear of the lots which face on New Jersey between Vincent and the future Milliken Road. This adjustment would allow for the expansion of General Industrial development into a largely vacant area with little or no impact on existing Minimum Impact /Heavy Industrial Uses. 2. The extension of Subarea 6 ( Iidustrial Park) to the west side of Utica, south of New Jersey Avenue. This would help "square off" the Indutrial Park District along Haven Avenue. Utica Avenue would form a logical dividing line for this purpose. a. An extension of Subarea 8 (General Industrial) an the east side of Etiwanda to the main railroad line south of Whittram Avenue, This area is PLANNING Cf1MMISSION STAFF REPORT REVISIONS TO ORE I_S.P. j June 25, 1986 Pag, 7 i currently in Subarea 16 (Heavy Industrial). This change would allow for less intensive industrial developments, in this area of Etiwanda Avenue. b. Another significant change must occur as a result j of a City- initiated General Plan Amendment at the t' southeast corner of Baker and Ninth Street. The designation was changed to Industrial Park (from Medium Residential), but the ajoining Subarea is y General industrial. Therefore, a new Subarea is j proposed, Subarea 17 (Industrial Park). In addition, a few residential related uses /areas on the perimeter of the original ISP boundaries were not included in the Plan. These areas are also included in Subarea 17 notably north of Foothill G' Boulevard ating Central Avenue, and'-the southeast corner of Archibald and Main (recent- General Plan ' Amendment). The Industrial Park for Subarea 17 wli help to limit, with development and Performance criteria, any impacts on neighboring uses, c. Another modification proposes to add the railroad right -of -way north of 8th Street to the boundaries of the Industrial Specific Plan. Permitted use changes include the addition of the Iew Office /Design Research and Development Categories to Subareas, 7, 12, 16 and 17 (conditionally to Subareas 1, 3, 8, 11, and 14) and ',-asearch and Development /Light Manufacturing to Subareas 1,. x, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, 14, 16, and 17 (conditic, _fy permitted in Subarea 10). _ Finally, the Special Consideration section of each Subarea tat. been modified to provide fora 1. The expanded Rail Service Requirements in those Subareas which have existing or planned spur litre development. 2. Special design considerations for those properties which are adjacent to the I -15 freeway. 3. Expanded building setback requirements for those Subareas which abut existing Residential Districts:. yam. N vii aW m. AI Ix : It is Te- Part V be ores to the le cc.tfusion ie for the has caused Appendix L expanded to ier proposed y reference .ments. The g applicants lal Study of Lao and has from this istrial Area accompanyintS nent. The 11 not alter •ran! ntal Impact 1tiai Study, 3n fcr the ,sion, upon 1cific Plan, se goals of t materially area, staff tent of is evidence- industrial Cies of the thority for ral Plan by rds for all W.....Opm ..... 1-7 a La ua AI Ix : It is Te- Part V be ores to the le cc.tfusion ie for the has caused Appendix L expanded to ier proposed y reference .ments. The g applicants lal Study of Lao and has from this istrial Area accompanyintS nent. The 11 not alter •ran! ntal Impact 1tiai Study, 3n fcr the ,sion, upon 1cific Plan, se goals of t materially area, staff tent of is evidence- industrial Cies of the thority for ral Plan by rds for all W.....Opm ..... 1-7 a La Tiz AI Ix : It is Te- Part V be ores to the le cc.tfusion ie for the has caused Appendix L expanded to ier proposed y reference .ments. The g applicants lal Study of Lao and has from this istrial Area accompanyintS nent. The 11 not alter •ran! ntal Impact 1tiai Study, 3n fcr the ,sion, upon 1cific Plan, se goals of t materially area, staff tent of is evidence- industrial Cies of the thority for ral Plan by rds for all W.....Opm ..... 1-7 a La )us to the Facts for Resolction ;trial Area n would be i a tr i v u )us to the Facts for Resolction ;trial Area n would be } i )us to the Facts for Resolction ;trial Area n would be i )us to the Facts for Resolction ;trial Area n would be If spaces 100 spaces To,.a? 101 spaces ' 2. 25,000 sq.ft. Office 25 OOO s .ft. Office /rS0 s�.ft.- 100 spaces 75L000 sq.ft. Warehouse's ---- -- ZU 00 sq.ft./ OG sq.ft = 20 spaces 300,600 sq.ft. Bldg /1000 sq.ft. = 20,000 sq.ft. /2000 sq.ft.- 10 spaces 100 spaces 0;:'900 sq.ft. /4000 3q.ft. 9 spaces, ` 0 ft. Warehouse = 39 spaces i 100 spaces Total 139 spaces E. 1. 3, 10,004 sq.ft. Office 10,000 sq.ft. Office /250 sq.ft.'- 40 spaces '30 000 sq.ft. Warehouse -- - 20,000 sq.ft./3i O s0 q. ft. _ 20 spaces �t0 OtTO sq.ft. Bldg. /1000 sq.ft = ZO;000 sq.ftoi,2000 sq.ft. = 10 spaces s 100 spaces 50,000 so ft. /4000 sq.ft. 13 spaces. 90,000 sq.ft. /Warehouse =43 sp.i,,es . 100 spaces Tot,il 83 spaces fk PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT 4 REVISIONS TO TFE I.S.P. June 25, 1986 Wage 10 EXHIBIT I rARKING CALCULATIONS CURRENT MEIHOG' N NEW METHOD Ni 1 100,000 sq. ft,. building 1 100 "no sq� ft. building 1. 1 15,000 sq. ft. Office 1 15,0 On s_g.ft. Office /250 sq.ft. = 6 60 spaces 83,000 sq.ft. Warehouse --- 2 20:;000 •sq.ft. /IOOO = = 20 spaces'' /1000 sq.ft. = 1 17,000 e;q.ft.M000 i = 10 spaces, tj 100 spaces 4 45�g000 s .ft. /4000 :, = = 13 space r alicho AMBER OF COMMERCE 7365 CARNELIAN STREET, SUITE 1310 RANCHO CUCAMONCSA CA 91730 11086 TELEPHONE. 7141987 -1012 City Council Of Rancho Cucamonga City HLII 9320 Baseline Road ( Rancho Cucamonga, CA '91730 Council idembers, ;. I have attached the I -15 Corridor Svbcemmittee Recommendations that were C Specific Plan Amendments, giv-n to your staff during their review of the. Industrial Specific Plan. F ^1T a Fey:" their draft ofi Industrial S owing P ndments, the Subcommittee unanur !y r`gcYded to modify tha final paragrap.7, titled III -.D Implementation, Of thr to -lied subcommittee recommendations. Ea, The ,uu dittee decided that the best implementation of their findings would rt` h zo extend Sub Area 3 between Rochester and the 1 -15 South from Arrow to the north border of Sub Area 13. Further, to ea -;:end Sub Area 14 between the utility easement and the I- 15 ,north to the south border of Sub Area 8. It Was felt that these changes enhancing the view of the cmmuniitydtoeI tl5�travelersaandldesiof preserving and �rowti). red industrial Yocr Consideration of tt;e subcommittee's recommendations is greatly appreciated. i Respectfuji,, submitted, D. Tho,..as Flynn Chairman, I -15 Task Force DTF :kc enclosure -- EGCIVC4 -�- cc' Brad Buller CRY OFRANCHacur..AhioncA PLANNING DFVISlo" Aran Warren Jim Barton JUN 111986 All] PM `�I8iJIl01���i1a�z�41616 I VM nANCr,n riICAPIC)tirA i 13 ye e� �rnluuu�,, i'll"w l .d ` sv Hen+ C+xi AM JUN 1 11986 Ph} ;r 7365 CARNET IAN STREET, SLSISE 130 RANCHO CUCA.MONGA, CA 91730 TELEPHONF.; 7141987 -1012 f 1 -15 CORRIDOR SUBCO'NMITTEE RECOi•MENDATIONS d: - I. GACI'GROUND I11FORPATION A. The I -11" Task Force of the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce Economic Development Committee was established at the 18 December, 1985 Economic Development Committee meeting and commenced meeting on 8 January 1986. The Chairman of the Task Force is Mr. D. Thomas Flynn of General Dynamics. There have been approxi,eatiy four meetings of this Task Force to gather information from numerous Parts of the business community inciud- inq landowners, developers, businesses, and concerned citizens. This Task Force has come up with numerous :actual findings and has determined various conclusion for the Economic Jeve i:nnt Committee to be submitted to the City Council for their infurmation. II. FINDINGS A. LAND PRICES Information for land comparables in the area have been provided by Inland Commercial Brekerage, Safeco Title, Chicago Title, Cushman and Wakefield and others. Exhibit "A" specifies actual trasactions taking place in the Inland Empire l -lest showing land prices in the industrial catagory from approximat,y 52.50 per foot to approximatly Y4.50 per foot. As can be noted from Exhibit "A"', prizes are higher on properties closing escrow nearer the present time. B. EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES Attached Exhibit "B" is infrrmation provided from Willard V. Jones, Director of the Employment Training Agency, with specific information r on the type of business man that will be providing a higher quality of :he businesses, in the State of California employ over two hundred people. C. BUILDING SIZE RELATIONSHIP TO JOB CREATION Exhibit "C" was provided by the California Association of Independant Businesses, Incorporated, and shows a direct correlation between build- ing size and job creation. Conclusion to this and Exhibit "C" will be provided later in this recommendation. D. GRO;iTII OF BUSINESS There has been virtually no growth of businesses within the ninimum impact /heavy industrial zone compared to the general industrial and business park plan. For the last two years almost all of the industrial VA —V1 a;r activity in the city has been Property %lithin the ISP's general industrial avid business Parks. i t E. INCREASED TRAFFIC 1. Due to the completion of the I -15 and it's connection to the 91 Free - WDY, there will be a sizeable increase r I in traffic count which trill further enhance this corridoras the visual gateway i'ro the City Rancho Cucamonga. of Z. Commencement of the Regional Shopping Center in the Fall of 1987 gill also add to the increased traffic and its sphere of influence in and along freeway corridors will require a charge in the niture of the corridor, current F, INABILITY TO PROVIDE RAIL WITHIN AREA OF THE 1 -15 _CORRIDOR tditii;ct the minimum impact /heavy industrial zone, it is impossible to provide rail service between Arrow Highway on the north and the A.T. a:-.d S.F. raiiroads on the south. G. Rancho Cucamonga is bordered by Fontana which encourages heavy industrial users with their lower land base and proximity to the honcho Cucamonga labor base, H. At this point in time all of the property owners in Subarea R9 within this corridor have been contacted. With zoning protection for some existing users, the majority of owners heartily ��Rro;., the con- elusions and recommendations of this committee. See Exhibit "D" for ownership list, IIi nCLUSIms A. DESIGNATIOtI As supported in the findings of both the California Association of Independant [Businesses and the Employment Training Agency, it is evident that smaller ousinesses and smaller buildings will create a greater amount of labor activity in the area. The current zoning requirements for the general industrial and business parks also illustrate the higher labor intensity due to greater parking require- ments for medium and lighter industrial usages. Current grotIth within the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the medium and Small Industry categnry is muc), higher than heavy industrial due to the fact that they can pay higher lease rates caused by the increased price AML VA —V1 Y, d44 7, of property in the aree'._ Ine current lead prices are another factual illustration of the difficulty tor the I -,Aavy industrial user to locate a new business within the City of Raoch'i Cucamonga. The elimination of lot size designation should be handle� e'Ither by a change in the industrial SPeCifiL plan or by the institution of an overlay for this particular district. B. EXPAND SUB AREA 9 The recommendation 'Is to ipclude or expand the permitted and conditional usages of sub-area 9 within this corridor and to include those allowed witriin sub-area 13 and sub-area, 8 which have numerous overlapping usages. This will allow the type of use and help, - the city target the busincsses that can handle. 1) high(r land prices; Z, architectural requirements required due to freeway orientation; and 3) allow the city to target in on more sitinificant area of industrial growth within the city. This subcomm I tt��e reco;.1mends staff review the entire Subarea #9 for similar changes. C. �REPARATIOR OF DEVELOPMERT PLAN Preparation 0 a development agreement to protect the current users in the heavy industrial /minimum impact zone guaranteeing their,current !.jusiness and future viability, and also give them the right to either Sell or change their use to corfrom to the current overlay or change in the industrial specific plan. The relationship of sub-area 13 and 8 provides a natural connection to the 1-15 corridor without creating an island within the minimum impact/heavy industrial zone. D. IMPLEMENTATION This committee cioes not have specific direction for implementation of these chages. !Jowever, il�c two most 1,)q,*,:al ways, would be either through an overlay or t1rough a change in the industrial specific plan. Our concern in this regard is related to the ab"lity in which to adopt recom- mendations. "A 4r ;{ RESOLUTION NO. 9 ' A RESOLUTION t` THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING THE - ADOPTION OF REVISION3,T0 THE SPECIFIC PLAN FOR THE INDUSTRIAL AREA WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City to encourage an orderly and planned system of growth throughout the industrial area of the City, and v WHEREAS, a Specific Plan for the industrial area was adopted by the x City in 1981 to provide for stash a system of growth, and WHER(:AS, planning law of the State of Californik provide for the City's adoption of a Specific Plan which sets forth land uses and standards for develofpment and any revisions thereto, and WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held duly advertised public hearings to 0,icit public review and comment on the Draft Revisions to the Industrial Area Specific Plan and Environmental Assessment in accordance .tith Government Code Section 65150, and a, WHEREAS, full consideration has been given to each comment or request made concerning the Draft Revision to the Industrial Sper.f:c Plan and Environmental Assessment, and WHEREAS, all items have been accomplished in accordance with the State Law of California regarding adoption of the Specific Pian and granting of a Negative Declaration. i NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga certifies that the Initial Environmental Study prepared for the Revision to the Industrial Area Specific Plan as being an adeugate review of the potential significant environmental impacts and that a Negative Declaration is granted, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the city of 7ancho Cucamonga recomme-,,as adoption by the City Council of the Revision to the Industrial Area Specific Plan as prepared by staff and amended by the Planning Commission. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF JUNE, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSIO1 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman 10 ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary + K ��. '77", PLAIN146 COMMISSZ3lJ SOLUTION NO. ' 2EliSIONS Ta TN L' I..A June 25, 1986 a e. . Page 2 I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the rCiTty of s Rancho Cucamengar do hereby, certOy that °:the -foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, pa,,sed,_.an adopted by the Planci,ing Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ';t a, regular meeting of the Planning Cnmmtssfon held on the 25th day of June; ]:986,`'by the fcllowing vote-td-wit: ? � AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Iy NOES: COMMISSIONERS, 3 ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: i 3 ` 1A - XS t U El :. -- = - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT I9 77 DATE: June 25, 1986 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM; Brad Buller, City Planner t i BY: Dino Pu�rino, Assistant Planner { SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSirSSME #T AND DEVELOP4,FNT F'EVIEW $6 -di - ARICAL - The Tire eve opment of two office v its totaling 0,� square feet on 4.24 acres of land in {he Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) located at the nort4aast corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street - APR 209- 41 -15. i i I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested- Approval -�t site plan, Phase I elevations and issuance- a Negative Oeclarat'on. B. Surroundinq Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant, Industrial Park (Subarea 6) South - Vacant, Industrial Park (Subarea 6) East - Vacant, Industrial Park (Subarea 6) West - Vacant, Industrial Park (Subarea 6) C. General Plan Desi nations: i Project Site - Industrial Park North - Industrial Park South - Industrial Park East - Industrial Park West - Industrial Park D. Site Characteristics: The project site, and the adjacent north and' east properties,, are vacant. The grade differences between Haven Avenue and the project site change from approximately 2 feet at the south property line and 8 feet at the north property line. ,3 ITEM I �l ,. i PLANNING COMMISSION STApr REPORT ° June 25, 1986 nR 85 -07 - Arice, Pale 2 i IL ANALYSIS A. Ge.lerai,, F The proposed "project has been designed consistent with te Haven Avenue Overlay District. The site plan demonstrates a building configuration which screens parking from Haven Avenue. phase 7 j)f the project, proposed two -story building, has been located a,� the corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street, parallel to Haven, in order to make a, strong architectural statement. A three -story .office building (Phase 11) is proposed perpendicular tc Haven Avenue forming an upside down 11V shaped configuraiiD� for the total project. Separating- the proposed ZNI_ xngs is a large pedestrian plaza. The proposed elevatians feature brick veneer and Greylite glass for an urbamt sophisticated style consistent with the Haven Avenue Overlay !listrict. No elevations for Phase II are proposed at this',:.tme. In addition to the proposed 'two -story building, Phase I includes improvement of the entire parking area and full width stWeetscape landscaping. Phase II consists of basically the building pad for the future three -story building. B. Design Review Committee: At the May 22, 1986, Design Review Committee Meeting, thi Committes rem- ommendzd approval of the proposed site plan and elesations subject to extending the two -story building east side main pedestrian entry plaza into the parking area by relocating the paring ,adjacent to this entry area (see landscape plan). The applf ant has cor�plied with the above recommendation. C. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee has revie,,ie-&-tle—rir—ole-c-t--an-FTetermined that with the recommended Conditions of Approval, the project is consistent with the applicable Standards and Ordinances. Note: Overhead utilities " exist on the Apposite side Gl Haven Avenue frontage and the property side of 6th Street frontage. It is recommended that the applicant be required to pay en in -lieu fee equivalent to one -half of the established cost of undergrounding the electric lines less than 66 kv and telecommunication lines along the Haven Avenue frontage and undeground the electric lines less than 66 kv along the 6th Street frontage. D. Environmental Assessment: Upon review and completion of Part I an Part lI of the Initial Study, Staff has found no significant adverse environmental impacts related to the development. i «y , lu KI PLANNING COMMIS-9130N STAFF REPORT June 25, 19a6 DR 86 -07 - Arical Page 3 III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This :project is consistefi -with the Industrial Area Specific-Plan and General Plan, ','pie project will not be detrimental to adjacent prop ertYes or cause significant environmental impacts. :In .addition, t11t: proposed site and 4uilding designs, together with the recomf4e ed conditions, are in compliance with the Industrial Area; SperaiYfiv, Plan and City i Standards, IV. RECOMMENDATIONt `' Staff recommends that the Planning Coakssitz approve Oeve- Tapment Review .,fib -O7 per the adoption of the attached Resolution and Condition& -`,of Aoroval anii issue: a Negjkive Declaration for the project. Res ully submitted; Bra Butler City Planner RB:DP:dak Attachments: Exhibit "Ai" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "B " - Site Utilization Map Exhibit " "C"' - Site Plan Exhibit I'D" - Elevation Plans Exhibit " "E!" - Landscape Plans Resolution" With Conditions of Approval Standard 'Conditions Pf Approval CITY OF / � RANCHO GITCAm0ITGA PLAI`mNTG DIVISION T_y NURTH ITEM: SC o-07 TITLE: FXHIi3i I': ,� ,� SALE, lu E - ---------- T t7 AP, 2. , YtA CITY Of, . iTr-m.---D-F-- RANCHO CUCAMONGA Tinx...S, PL.&NNINIG DIVI.SICXN EXfilBrr--jJLL SCALE, N7--S I-s I I 1 '�; i NORTH i ljLLTm�tE li �� ' e�rtb I�ne� 11r DATA um 784.00A 6FOJ4 ACA 4 sunnws rf ;, .. _ . Pkku ow- 32.47. V. A ye ...,.;� n TOTAL 10.7 ar - �oPt atKrm+a PAMINC;tVXD AT 1n5C 310 STALLS' I I STAWIM STALLS Leo eruu COMACT STALLS � NtSTALLS i7.ai • I. (` 11AND=PPED STALLS . STALLS ' 'I c I III I I - TOTAL ,,. *TAUS LANOSCAPiNG 3:434 5.r. ts�sf l� II \S � ; - � • i If�iltir ili�: a( t _ FFKX '+¢ t ~ IT r . cn- .u�•,:::ws+.:te.�sc*+a..�rrree r...r �u rxa.u.rarw.a.� LEGFJi7 • - FAZE /IiONNt 14/^ \0111 NORTH ' I I CI TT OF :."NC.;HO CLIC4:AkMOZTGA THE " _r- _7ELAM I`�.., ,Nt NINE DIVI.SlUX EXH.l3IT- u u A u I I z a 0 t I— 0 Z W z I '77- r _ r� =Mal ` tJ ti _ {J Al n � , ! I 'E ti RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THC RAICHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 86 -07 LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND 61H STREET IN. THE rODUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT "i WHEREAS, on the 10th da;r of March, 1986, a complete application was i filed by Arica] for review of the above- described project; and C WHEREAS, on the 25th day of June, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning ;I Com,.iission held a meeting to consider the above- described project. J follows: NOW; THEREFORt,'the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Cor Ission resolved as , SECTION 1: That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed project is ,consistent with the objectives of the General Plaa -and 2. That the proposed use is in accord with the € objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; 4 and ` 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That this project will lot create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued or vune 25, 1986. SECTI04 3: That Development Review No. 86 -07 is approved subject to the following conditions and attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING: 1. A Minimum four (4) foot pedestrian walk connection shall be provided from the main pedestrian entry plaza on the east side of the twos -story building (Phase I), to the cer * plaza between the two -story and three -story buildings. ' 9 r. PLANNING COMMISS1164 1{5S6,LUTIDN June 25, 1986 DR 86 -07 - Arical �. Page 2. Development of the proposed three -story building (Phase it ); is subject to a i=plete Development /Design Review process and Planning Commission review and approval. The architecture of Phase II shall be consistent with the design /materials of Phase I. 3. The plaza north of the two -story building shall be competed prior to occupancy of phase i. Landscaping, pedestrian facilities and signage shall be designed consistent with the Haven_Avenue Overlay District. S. The building pad area for Phase It (three -story building) shall be temporarily hydro - seeded ' (minimum) and irrigated with Phase I. ENGINEERING: 1. A reciprocal drive approach em Haven Avenue with the adjacent property shall be recorded prior' to issuance of a building permit. 2. OVERHEAD UTILITIES: A. HAVEN AVENUE - The applicant shall pay, prior to building permit issuance, a fee in lieu of undergrounding overhead electric lines less than 66 kv and telecommunication lines along the west side of Haven Avenue from the Centerline of 6th Street to the nokhern properly line. Said fee shall be one -half of the front -foot cost of undergroundirg: B. GTH STREET - Existing overhead electric lines less than 66 kv on the north side of 6th Street froin the first pole east of the easterly property line to the first pole west of Haven Avenue shall be placed underground prior to occupancy, 3. The applicant: shall provide a deepened e- flaired footing along the west i4a/ls for proti,;tion of the City's existing storm drain syst.{T to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4. 'notice of intent to join the proposed Median Island Landscape District shall be filed with the City Councsl ,prior to issuance of a building permit. tC� Wit, + 1 :' - a _ ,-�s , f PLANN196 6,OMMtSSL -N RESOUITiON Julie Z5, 3966 OR 86 -07 - Arioa.l` Page 3 , rL APPROVED ANO ADOPTED THIS M DAY OF JUNE, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAi' r BY: •. Dennis L. Stout, Chaxirman t _ ATTEST • Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary I, Brad Bulier, +Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucanong.a, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Pt3nning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,, at ar, .+gular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of June, 1986, by the following vote -to -wit: z� AYES: COMMISSIONERS. i. NOES: COMMISSIONERS• ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: y .a a Z; t! pl.yp e_. a oL To..r d A d ^" u�u N «� fig C�.nY CV 6AL O ♦. N qL iiJ V� uNyy6,l. �� p0. p A Im —ue. ' O ► E C V Y W y O O d 6 y I U E N N _C u22Ard qu Oa=+OU� RL3 °pA.OT Sim E E9u.Y� u ° qu��Ow a �'•G V NN Y d^ tU EL y.F LCdC.EE nP��..,r 'OT 6. q qLa p,'A V �' NA AYdviG O. i N.d. d C�up� aQ,o^Ys ° Nyd dC O. d40 O� dwC.� L 4� LC 400. g0.H N a^ O ^' ^Od Yq�dy� asq yp ,y Oti L0.6 ^�a` Ja C `C'O C NE G aL bwUa q S DOE o a9.2 pD ~` ­22d-.2 .- wLiCC'Y°u p� nno c.0 Oj �v4 ��[r a ad. ad .E Cam: Nc EdE G yµ .y _ � o c 2yo cL9 o�.e c .. —Ed. r �.... in •�-.. c Ny a. o as � o °.� uu Q"t +3 QOgm ILL 6L 6V r � 1 a+d o aL.. Y 7 p M�a N�vuiYO O ^ ^uRERq � �I, NEEE °MO M C .� EdE G Oru Nye U.5 A -0- d ° L O usy N u� dyYl d,du0 i W °R.dc iJ N �N L N M � Gdy— IYUw _ C N w E ggE v O — L A py Aa AypT �u y A o A «ud u z s e. ° p °o :c '9 o d N o.''�•o` y AcC o > cyuuCd Y J 7 Rc O N U, V j .. q6.r _u ✓ 40. R a q 4 N i w}' N 6v+.2M A d NL aoi �. 1� O + SS Qrgi 14 1+1 a vi 3^ ^ «=.= as+�'ea cirno �N�i.ic ^a �.p ae ay b iEyiL ♦y C'. N O Y•ti« NP y N q E �. y. O n W9b yy� x o ^° n°• o c ogV kb a aN y >CO Ly R!t G WE r Cdq 2L g� jyNC. CR �y c^ b t { � ^y � ^' >a #r-at °oq °� a«'♦1u tc>1 -' 1` ..ate ••.°.. 11 01 CF q T dy 9y0-ip E c iN c •� ' R 04 N= x o� r 1 O O E 0�j b aG d z c WN qCV N Va 1°r ^ RC OG VW iR�b O N C= • x - } c O~ a. ;E8 NV o•' Nx N S. C� NWbL Yc 6 Nd "'"� Na Nrp- � Y C ^ Ct O u. WY O O V W t. A • uo rd ♦N ha• g;: Y D L,L� U E Y ^.°. fG— F: SOS Y y 0Y �O. RcV F Vim y d E.� L �.& xyN Gb CNOQY E� L cuOdn qp q£6l.dCL >. pc.1W tl Vpd B6.`Cp 4C s Wi2�yy <E�wG ¢NU.u� 1101v Ow SStv1 Y1.1 dc�y N do .� 0 .:. AE ci t CV dr%4 y1F >°iJC au ~O .c- a v a0C Otx y O�ui+Q R R 33x-11 + y La• N �2 U VS•. O ^ d t LCCu � A N 7s C =a c WO Ry a >a=+N. 6L EE a• ^ 3ETW y ^.—:5 nrp O a 0 i5 LL' q GN C v L i.W E p. °a 1r Y. c aWE�LUIppWS T fi'Kq 0L0. Ey.0 St 4 d�c� _H j �l op a. UL ^ AA maa n O ^cEO V�Tu LsYi cdyu ^E. NNY< 0�0•`A ~. d' ONYQ. b•,• V. NuN N O Y♦ � N .O OI WRN q�c t�Y Y4 O NYO O �' ^dbr,j T WWS ^1^pObY �L > 4• �01 NL RE. = aN L } G =N « N o ntY yo u t di ba ut cEY ma m, A °aL bat= YZ COOY W4 �SCW Nt�.A �> `aY yOdt5 ur.E YaT o^ 6�+� D c= u >yd?OE Vyi� b p0 W0 p C r R S Y L N p Oy a Wq ¢ O C S 9 Q ° �♦ V O NN G b .S y V. E Y1 NN >? O.W t i Yp -fib oy JCL WCC C c dEd E dH NLZ Ir t .� Y� Y Lb 6tb a• O. C d Y NyS p1 b R. n =0 ra pCp u� ,-4.9 Ey p NYu b u b N Ny wy ^0 NY «0p W�6 ..0 t) pW mi 414-a U 1^4..'1` 0�+�+♦O� u p q Y ° u L p O'y W a> ♦ G L O gc L 0 W E 9 C Y y V U ea!-, W Y• N �q m ,� GcC Y G C q NON o it Cy c OO Ay0 O v oR'� o 6 p n n dn € t uci 6 L N n Ir L - L 0, Y b Y O W < a° u Wi E N b' o o u C a Y Y u O y i Y N N ,O. N W' L Y' J � p 6 d g q� � � Y Y„ r ,,,• 9< W R _ ly •` ^' L ^ o.V U CZ w.CPOLCb Lam.°+ GZ TN E u9. Sp Y -0 yYt. 9 rnp 4q^ 99 E =po P a =�C k ° S °9 '•c' ONO ELiVSy w gfT�C G O Z U 3 n N 4E t N G1. • r 6 v S L q R O< '� y G O g Y N W M a 9 ,� A y. D .. ti y — d q N U E IS Y N Y G O •n .9u "" LUG P a Cr•. A. p dP'1 i�4 Oa �.a^ �'p Tyr... 9 G wy•- L .Q .-.0 }•y. CL o�p� QS9 Lt 1. �, Da Uq B. O GAF. q �q GL a- yy -2 •• y cq y ON CNV � •^, dN LNq G Y duN ?� c9+Cy d d LL L Y o c .. N C.� E E Ed nL n • E y d•^ d C ggNUY.L AX, v O.P ° ^? yY r u C G9 L.... L Ga°- -s d}',� i. e C 6 9 E O S2, d SP . iuyi��°' C •C Eum 6adi .'=u wy O O t Lu ..r d-El > t '� G y ay dY o ' Ua9 Lc L ry�. 'moo L dd v 29 oi'o ey n o- C — y 6L 'n 9 b O y 6 NO°c C S q` d 6 n p y U N� L i. yr N y o c$ C O P n •c q o. r^ EG A vv Yd ,� C N i - f Moi P ^^ 4 M ... L ,a L y i • ti Q y r qEL. -. P �' •N OC Yu tnu yEEO Cdc No a O� —OC yp �•gg+> ApL9 '•'NOp U vV d d°• Yc 'n v q � °LjO ^ o dv • qa. y Eayiu .�q U 6.^+ 9 �W wGp L ... "' Y y.a�iLyW.L nUO oN �tLL C d ....T 9i4 A Lq 9+°'� E9 `Ld• 9 yu . P 6 A9d r A A n Np q Ut 9� LG iur RLUO nY°P a9�cT C0 E -.,z y C ° L m N C� +d. O ° On W O L c° U yi•�+� BE nti wuN v4i H^ L ` P� a C9 y. V yq ^Py G rJ 7'. L aNO^ -2.— NU NqN y °�P.. 6Cayir LYN° Lp ?• Y u�Ea u�— L Eu CON..n ,Yn XG pg i. ALL d !V a°• EE U !49 !"C NrN GCC.. QNdN W66�NUy0. C4 C4 b N O�^•"b L d.0 v D• _ :E: E A L t =2i. Ur p Y •l°. OU n am cq orc z . Q•NGL _ d�l � C E Y •- Ly CL C V = CCi q u Y u v .a.O U� c, ♦'+� ° E°gaw. «Y� Nip nO 1F6 y° c ii .,_ L wE o eb+ m 2L. E E° pt! N� N S. 'In ^' i n�. n» �, CL. s AW CCE Y.a V +� O`. +;- Ov ON UOn rcY njI .� `J. •�^L I` n^ C ✓ uAiL J�.�o L L T S T w'q Yis. vC �-v y�u q >nC 40 °^ azz Y • aCe a°i r r^ Fni° =•a,otl ER o =LLLUf G N H/Am rA• n y O�^•"b L d.0 v D• _ :E: E A L z ✓cpy uT V+ E.1 �c a gFEoLq >` X •l°. OU C 6n.�N Y Ubtl � "� Q•NGL _ d�l au HOC C cud CL ✓ gW,ua q�p' �a y z up q u qm A.d. .a.O U� 'id ♦'+� YA FryyF O.Cq✓ A._+rC n�acm � b .,_ L wE o eb+ m 2L. E E° .N.9 KGL t Li' V ✓`ei U p _ nN GGEE n» �, O I -ti.WL d L�dA O`. +;- O njI .� `J. •�^L I` b^ La Q•NGL _ d�l ybY HOC C �L =a. 4'n� n yU FaL O Y C q9 up q u G , A.d. C n» �, n ^ dG S tl9y s D• uAiL J�.�o r T w'q yr + O y�u q >nC °00. Y • aCe a°i r r^ _S .t C ✓° �r u++ rA• n y Gu ^'°^ y o�' ob a Etu. yN E�nO t2 ,^ yLL C9 O •'LO v"' qNp N.uG nvrq N n Nudc « NVwyE,+L.. �rQ n°�r. d r va m C C d N« u 'd `pd nq✓ wdv� ao br4` OE ti q4y n r ' rnp 'L-.c ° 6 ° ✓Yon} 'C mNO,- ea Q rAn � r �3 G r 3. ma ` NN to ... b C Y Icy .rC. N .l Or O1 > °3q NQ6 °gip cqG LC UU r E. LL L� q GE °E° NAY G ratliq� b YU u +m gyCL 4Q a n nvri sn�- � G i°q m M Oly °l L. PE r Y Lx LOx Yv . .� L E 4 F• q r K.n m O V E �o `E +•^ ES 4 > ai u 0.Yr N YJ E L �V 1 c U O h^� veGrna,n �aa RaY.+y Rro n R Q�9 R F ROw rye ti . cur Lu'-a oy ID N r C n �•�� �.d cu-o Gy�q» ^�aaa.r u"ia c+ wp �Rtir ua C'Q R ^L"VG L RtTU 6ati N d � �.G_� • ^ r.+.s V °..°.car V.- u...wau <QY VQ wi 9 V n� 4 p Or V V C ►� A> r >a V N d � N v N r.• c � u 9 � R R. a VC UCi t c s « ^ o n L v C b x rW by tTR �y o� W rv-p jJ V U a ¢ w e v v eN1.�r- av w N L°. V aii ¢ a ..C°j. NL. Od. � LV ✓ Vrr°.d w� ¢ d p d L v: a aF% 8 ,o cG 4 R L NA�6 �V n LyyR �0 O y ? C OC�WLi' O R pW N UR Km a°r¢L0. GV.i 2 /I7 L: .1 ` �W ed «diy Oa°eL C•N� u Ar'.M �CNM Cwn -.-dE ty anu4u ¢ �Cd �BeC Ura� ^� �+4a CNmy Y�d�awe dV�t ° «idb LM.Q.aY Co"�� 4u4 rdu.9� Ems+".° °acn ii °o N C G t ext., rn. dLtaez b d i 4dµ R3 r• n �aa °iv, u�o� uaro"c r 'N^4. wu9i per' ..tF 0.q'+^ Gi u«i44Y V d L w N N V L a NA�6 �V n LyyR �0 O y L� d a u �L°icu ` C1 • L -C 4t 'o is CIV �n �W ed «diy Oa°eL C•N� u Ar'.M �CNM Cwn -.-dE ty anu4u ¢ �Cd �BeC Ura� ^� �+4a CNmy Y�d�awe dV�t ° «idb LM.Q.aY Co"�� 4u4 rdu.9� Ems+".° °acn ii °o N C G t ext., rn. dLtaez b d i 4dµ R3 r• n �aa °iv, u�o� uaro"c r 'N^4. wu9i per' ..tF 0.q'+^ Gi u«i44Y V d L F, v «c Na. °Y. Lr+U4 T ^ w o on°• GOt . U t ° a �oaa�.° L q N G qE in q V ... d: ® a 6iOA a ^° '° °° ° O L�O t 4 C wuN Y'i of ca Ol c wu s L S ^a 'z cw Yop °o y °a Y�'^ Ed E .i OIN S.O co gvvN Cr V E` "'g aw icy svr av • °a Ya N,o ]y q.Ne NG � U PCY �. 0. OEq w iW MLK9 �. V N W LL Oy •ry �P q L c0 °ayi Sq 99 L e.^.. a^a a'i'•� Nazi v�:o ° .°�« �bumN � °c in �:�. ❑'• � 4 S♦ GULL^ �6q . yV Y i Nadi X19 cUti� +' UL Ew d4 G A4 1%� y ?L ° G9.COV ^u a Nu g L. or � a EG c6L Y O L Y }t Al pO aW �..N E n0 L y G My�G 6N '� ^W u.0 n V #ON�C NCQC y•� Z L a2 r 'Y 6H ~61Y Nti L.V N 6W A.� 4 6MM VIOU� y d ti.� y iU �� dr f41 �9 �y 9 M w L Y ^ G L LU Z �q tip p O t v «c s g v d d U aL V Z 9 G L q N G qE in ada anio vY ® a 6iOA a ^° '° °° ° O L q Y u u "v w wqY ai of ca ^ f Y i uo ^a 'z cw Yop °o y °a Y�'^ Ed E .i OIN S.O co gvvN Cr V E` "'g aw icy svr ° 0 wY i C ^ P aL V Z 9 L q N G a s ^ a« t y 9yG 9 v •°- u ® a 6iOA a ^° '° °° ° O L q Y Kn- w wqY v R ^ f Y N ' 1 i a� �_ G c •rY. Cu vd a b � L 4 ° N A u �. �Q au � G o° �• q L O^�°.. F" 44 T w t N u C q L 2 � vq p YrU.I ✓ L Y N Sw CqG g r r 3 � ou. dY aDU V + 6V1 tai q LM ^ a L� L L y � � ^ O W Cr edlr t}. rq OS �j.E Nq- kC L•a R! u. �` `C YGdM � q a°c O w adt aos v°- w s n K p d >> ° iw aw- vu c9 9 U r G °qS Sa' nY LL Vii: Nr` r L d wNUq r d ca ; f�ti E 6 d e Ei w G b m acNa a y L c ... Nail "•a 6 m tya. l � C ^ q w °u•" d °p qYa is � it A r^ O 0.iN c a_O CL -01 V4�g ar Coq Nil a` =0 q+ °Ly a46 9 .ailed °yC C. L ~e �W .Nu IV Y d L 61SU L ` a p O dr. q Uqq�W r`V L— aACI + �..a rycr Y�.r� aaS Q6M 4N Jid O „T LM LU Ra:Ce d i DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT dune ZS,, 1.986 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Nancy Fong, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REViEW'86 -09 X Y/L ON- POMEROY A ;=CIA The development. of7a Master Plan for a Y6 acre Industrial Park and the first phase consisting of two light industrial }wildings totaling 63,47: - square feet ou 4.7 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 12), located between Mil Men Avenue and Pittsburgh Avenue and between 6th Street and 4th Street - APN 229- 261 -58, 59. (Continued from June 1, 1986 Meeting.) RELATED FILE: PARCEL MAP 98-�G I. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission, aT the June 11, 1986 regular meeting continued the project to this regular meeting. The Planning Commission was concerned with the architecture for Phase 1 development in that variety of textured surface has not been provided to the buildings and directed the applicant to work with staff in revising the elevations to meet their concerns. Staff will give an oral presentation regarding the revised elevations of the Planning Commission Meeting regarding the revised elevations. II. RECOMMENDA ?ION: Attached For your review is the Resolution of Approval with conditions incorporating the changes as discussed by the Planning Commission. If the Commission concurs witii the Findings, issuance of a Negative Declarat4on and approval of OR 86- 09 would be in order. RereqTtfuliy m to /Brad 3uller City Olanner BB :NF:ns Attachments: June a, 1?86 Planning Commission Staff Report Resolution of Tipp.,oval with Conditions ITEM J A 1 J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 11, 1986 1077 TO: Chairman and members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Associate-Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONKFUITAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW -86-09 BIST /LEA ON TOMEROY -ASSOCIATES - The development of a Ouster -Plan,, a 3 acre -Industrial Park and the first ,chase consisting of two light indusstrial buildings totaling 63,4174 sqpare feet on 4.7 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subaru 12), located between Milliken Avenue and Pittsburgh Avenue and between ft Street and 4th, Street - APN 229-261-:;3, 55', RELATED FILE: PARCEL MAP 9896 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of conceptual Master Man, Phase I site plan and elevations, and issuance of a Negative, Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: Wo-rth- Meld-isco, industrial building under construction; General industrial, subarea 11. South - Vacant, City of Ontario East - Approved industrial project, vacant; Industrial Park District, Subarea 12 West - Vacant; Industrial Park Dist,ict, Subarea 12. C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Industrial Park North - General Industrial South - Not available, City of ,ntario East Industrial Park West Industrial Park D. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant and veaetation consists of decaying vineyards. The i1ortheast cor.iei of 4th Street and Milliken Avenue is designated as The Gateway to the f-ty. J -,a E®i i 9 PLANNING CGMMISSION STAFF REPORT OR 86 -09 - Bi >xby /Leason Pomeroy Assoc, June 11, 1986 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: A. General: 1. Master Plan. The intent of this "ester Plan is to serve as a guideline for future development through es;�ablishirg driveway access, overall circulatior. sister `'drainage patterns, and architectural design concept. 'Ali future_ developments within the Master Plan boundary would require separate development /design review. A related parcel map is also being considered by the Planning Commission at this meeting, A separate staff iport has been included for your review. The proposed Master Plan subdivides the site into 13 parcels ranging from the size of Z acres to 7 acres where the extension of 5th Street would bis•_ct the site area into two parts, The Master Plan is intended to create a single unified development within, but maintaining individual identity as wet as being self - supporting. This is achieved thrr?;�h.'speculative, buil 7 -su, lot sales to individual xiters such as Phase I development. Each i nff.sdual propa:e!i- -development will- have individual pla I open space area, ''s..;emphasize a pedestrian oriented camp;.s �1 i ke setting for the Master Plan, the developer is proposing to insrrli perimeter landscaping for the entire Master Plan boundary with Phase I Nievelopmerrc. 2. Phase I Development: Phase I devel oini*nt is located on the norlFi si e� of tutu`re 5th Street. It =Is sts of two Tight industrial buildings with one building for each parcel, and are self- supporting except for the si;ared dr +eway access. Pleas and outdoor patio areas have'6Ga^ provided for each parcel as shown in Exhibits "H" and "I< ". The proposed elevations consist of painted tilt -up concrete- panels with painted wing walls that ,zerve as architectural elements as well as screening of surface area as shown in Exhibit "J ". Additional elements such as planter arbors, trellises, and pergolas provide visual interest to the otherwise simple concrete titt-up panel buildings. Staff Comment: The proposed architectural elements provide some relief o the typical box -life industrial buildings,, However, such proposed elevations may set the tone for the architectural program for the entire Master Plan. Staff is concerned that greater building variation in depth and angle shouad be used to create variety and interest in the basi,''form and silhouette of the building consistent with the goals of the Industrial Paris District, Staff recommends that strong design .� -3 PLAUNINC GQMMIS ;ION STAFF REPORT DR 86 -09 - Bixby /Leason Pomeroy Assoc. June 11, 1986 Page 3 F guidelines be incorporated in theiMaster Plan text and the CC & R's for the parcel map to be revieweC and approved by the Planning Commission to ensure t ^:tt architectural variety will by provided for in This Viz;ster_Plan, Design guidelines could' include the following c0teria. A. Articulation of the elevation surfaces should be encouraged through the use of openings and recesses w•ch create texture and shadow patterns and provide variety in the building plane surface'. B. Building entrances shall be wail artis,ilated and project a formal entry statement through variation of architectural planes, pavement surf-'ce treatment, and landscape plazas. C. Accent, treatment such is changes in exterior materials and texture is encouraged- in conjunction with variation in the major form givin1'elements of a structure. B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee has reviewed the project and made the following recommendations for the proposed Master Plan an6 Phase I development. Master Plan: 1. Carpus -like setting for the Master Plan be emphasized by requiring landscape and hardscape along at least one entire street frontage per parcel and by varying the landscape /building setback beyond the minimum average 45 foot on Milliken Avenue, 4th Street, and 6th Street, and minimum average 25 feet for Pittsburgh Avenue and 5th- Street. 2. Perim�Ler landscaping for the entire site /Maste^ Plan be provided with Phase I development to emphasize image of a campus -like setting with a unifying laaJ,,>caping +heme and continuous pedestrian walkway. 3. A landscape program establishing instalTation /maintenance criteria for thiz: shared planter islands at 4nterior property line be developed and approved with the Master Plan. 4. A uniform design program of security fencing be developed nd approved with the Master Plan.- -y PLANNING COMMISSIONµ STAFF REPORT OR 86 -09 - Bixby /Leeson Pomeroy Assoc. June 1.1, 1986, Page 4 �Y F S. Texturized pavement identifying pedestrian -paths be provided at all driveway entrances; and pedestrian connections be provided f.,an the perimeter sidewalk to the main `)ufl''ding entrance fo!? each parcel. 6. Location and conceptual design of transit,; stops and related pedestrian facilities be provided subject to Design Review Committee review and approval. I. The conceptual design of the Gateway be provided and subject to the Design Review Committee for review and approval. nr 8. The Uniform Sign Program for the entire Master Plan be provided and subjected to City Planner review and approval_ 9. Pedestrian plazas and courtyards s`ia11 be provided immediately adjacent to or near the perimeter greenbelt to promote the proposed campus —like setting. Interior plazas kY; or courtyards, when proposed, shall be secondary to the plazas and courtyards adjacent %.L or near the perimeter greenbelt. These areas shall be designed as focal points. 10. Architectural design criteria be developed and approved with the Master Plan. Variation in building planes through the use of openings, varying setbacks, angle walls, and recesses which create texture and shadow patterns is recommended. 11. A statement through the use of landscaping be ma0z to provide a visual connection of the north and south side of 5th Street. The developer has agreed to incorporate the above recommendations into the Master Plan text. However, the } developer is requesting that this be submitted at a later date in order to incorporate all of these recommendations in the Master Plan text as well as the CC & R's of the parcel map. staff recommends that the Master Plan text should be submitted for Planning Commission review prior to the recordation of a parcel map or the issuance of building permits for Phase I, whichever comes first. Phase I Development: 1. Convenient pedestrian connections•be provided to the main building entrance.- PtANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 86-09 - 8ixby-/Leason Pomeroy ASSOC. June 11, 1986 Page 5 88,NF,, t s *I 2. Mounding along Milliken and 5th Street should be F. undulating. The developer has agreed to the conditions. C. Existing Overhead Utilities- No overhead utt'llities exist. along the frontage of the Phase I developmenl�­`, How4ver, overhead utilities do- exist along 4th Street fr6fftage of the Master Planned site. A condition, requiring the undergrounding of all lines under 66 V has been included in the Conditions of Approval for Parcel Map 9893. F D. Environmental Assessment: Staff has completed the Environmental Checklist and has found the only significant environmental impact would be an impact upon the pru'ject from Milliken Avenue. Staff recommends that a final acoustical report be required for exterior noise as it relates to lunch courts. Therefore, staff has determined that there will not be a significant impact in this Lase because the mitigation measures as mentioned above have been added to the 'Conditions of Approval, If the Planning Commission concurs with these Findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. 111. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: ThIs project is consistent with the General Plan and the Industrial Specific Plan, The project, with the added mitigation measures, %fill not cause significant adverse environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use, building design, site plan for Phase 1, and the Master Plan, together with the recommended Conditions of Approval, are in compliance with the Industrial Specific•Plan and all other applicable provisions of the_ City Standards. W, RECOMMENDATION., Staff recommends that the Planning Commission consider all the material and input regarding this project. If the Commission concurs with -the Findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration and approval of Development Review 86-09 would be in order. Res t f u ' r idler City Planner 88,NF,, t s *I PLANNING COMMISSION. STAFF REPORT' OR 8649 - Bixby /Leason:Pomeroy Assoc. June 11, 1985 IASI Page n" Attachments: Letter of Master Plan Concept, March 11, 1986 R Letter Requesting Additional Time to Submit Master Plan t Text, May C2 „=1986 Exhibit "A” - Location Map Exhiblit "B" - Site Utilization Map Extrih i t "G" -'Parcel . Map Exhibit " O" - Master Plan Exhibit - Master Grading Plan Exhibit "F "= Detailed Site Plan for Phase I Exhibit "G" tConceptual Grading Plan for Phase I Exhibit "H" 'Conceptual Landscape Plan for ;Phase I Exhibit "I" - Elevations with Landscaping', E'chibit "J" - Elevations with No Landscaping *5 Exhibit "K" - Typical Patio, Plaza Details Resolution _Resoiutian of Approval with Conditions j ins* 4MA%w tz za ot J -B H H x a . � A 02 fill ;4 t a i k: IJVV yt' h r+ am M - � g E 41 �~ 40 cl, ow «\. \� \§ : \� ƒ - $ \� � \ � \§_� \� � ul ul f|� � |f.. ! . :. .\ . \�.\ / \ � ) . .� ��) do $ \� � \ � ul f|� � |f.. ! . :. .\ . \�.\ / \ � ) . .� ��) \ �� Tr . /| kf ` �� ] 4N, °';' q T 77"Ir 9 •1 �S it y v.. ye 1 �d { Ilk VIN P01h 14 k W4 *iot. 7z"I ta O Or r RESOLUTION, NO. A RESOLUTION OF TH''=IANLHO CUCAMONCA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 86 -09 FOR A 35 ACRE MASTF,R PLAN AND PHASE I DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF 2 LIGHT%' MANUFACT RING BUILDINGS TOTALINQa 63,474 SQUARE FEET LOCATED BETWEEN MILLIKEN AvENUE'AND PITTSBURGH AVENUE AND ce BETWEEN 6TH STREET AND 4TH STREET IN THE INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 5th bay of June 1986, 3 complete application was ! filed by Bixby Development Ltd. One for review of the above- described project;: and WHEREAS, on the 11th Day of June, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commissior held a meeting to consider tyre above - described leroject and € continued to June 25, 198C,regu -ar meet4ag; and WHEREAS, on the 25th day of June, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Plannninj Commission field a meeting to consider the above- described project. F NOW', THEREFORE,, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved n follows: SECTION 1: That the following can be met: 1. That t hi� proposed project is consistent _ .; the oojectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed use is in accord with the - ^bjective of the Industrial Specific Plan and the pupposes of the district in wi,,ch the site is j located; and j 3. That the proposes + ~• is it :ompliance with each of the applicable provisior+�, r the Industrial Specific - Plan; and k 4. That the orvposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, sa. ,ty, or welfare, or materially injurictis to p:•Uperties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTiCr: • That thin project gill not create adverse impacts on the environment anu �k Tenative 3e la.7'tion ;s issued on June 25, 1996. SECTION 3. yrt Review No. 86 -09 is approved subject to following cardition•, Standard Conditions: b u. I Resolution No. DR 86 -09 a 25, 1986' Page PLANNING DIVISION A. Master Plan: 1. The Master Plan is approved in concept only and future devclogment for each parcel shall be subject to Deveiapmuov /Design review process for Planning Cr.-q.m.ission ,.° approval, Modifications to the Master Plan shal'P be subject to Planning Commission approval: 2. "Campus -like setting" for the Plaster Plan shail- be emphasized by providing landscape and handscape. a3ang at least Gne entire street frontage per parcel and by varying the landscape /building setback beyond the micimum average 45 ft. for Mi i l?ken. Avenue, 4th 'S greet, and 6th • acrid- _mininram average 25 ft. for Pittsburgi Avenur and 5th 3. Perimeter land:eaping for the entire site /Master. Plan shall be provided with Phase i develupmeilt to errp6s;7e the image of the "campus- 11%e setting" with a unVying landscape theme and continuous pedestrian walkniay. 4. A. landscape program establishing irstallatic%, and at,t enance criteria for the sheared planter islands at tFe interior property lines shall be developed and app�•oved' with the Master Plana 5. ." uniform design program for security fencing shall be developed and approved with the Master Plan and :;ubje t tc the approval of Foothill C;ire District and the City Planner. 6. Te'tturized pavement identifying pee" `rian paths shall be provided at all driveway entrances and shall be of brick pavers, exposed aggregate, broom finished con:rete or a combination of them, subject to City Planner approval; and pedestrian connections shall be provided from the perimet °r sidewalk to i:he main builVog e:;trance for each parcel. 7. Location and conceptual design of transit stops and related pedestrian facilities shall be provided and s'iall be subject to Design Review Coa%iittec review and approval. 8. The cnncen ual design of the "Cateway ", a symbo'; ir, retry statement, shall be providft! to 4th Street and Ailiiken Avenue; enj smaller scale prole -+ entry statement shall he emalated at 6th Street and r,slliknn, 6th Street and Pittsburgh, and 4th Street & Pittsburgh: ResolL:tioq No. DR 86 -09 June 25, 1986 Page 3 9. The Uniform Sign Program for the entire Master Plan shall be provided and .subject to City Planner review and approval. 10. Pedestrian plazas or courtyards shall be provided immediately adjacent to or near the perimeter greenbelt to promote the proposed "campus -like setting ". These arras shall be designed as focal points. interior plazas or courtyards,- when proposed, shall be secondary to the plazas or courtyards adjacent to or near the perimeter greenbelt, 11. Architectural design guidelines shall be developed and should incorporate the following criteria: a. Architectural planes shall have variation in depth and angle to create variety and interest in the basic form and G,ilhouette of the building. b. Articulatio;r of the elevation surfaces is encouraged throagh thi use of openings and recesses wPrich create texture and shadow patterns and provide variety it the uuilding plarre or surface. c. Suilding entrances shall be well `articulated and project a formal entry statement through a variation of architectu ral planes, pavement surface treatment, and landscape, rlazas. d. Accent treatm(,,t such as changes in exterior materials and texture ,s encouraged in conjunction with variation _i-, the major forty giving elements of a structure. - 12. A statement through the use of lands aping shall be made to provide a visual,connectioa between the north and south side of Pith Street sutiect io CiLy Planner approval. 13. Full material samples and color shall be provided for individual development of each parcel. 14. The Master Plan text and /or the CC & R's for Parcel Map 9896 shall be developed to incorporate Conditions A -1 through A -13, and submitted for Manning Coiimission review and approval prior to recordation of Parcel Map 9896 or issuance of builr!ing pennits for Phase I development, whichever cams first. ,. — Resolution _ _,, DR June 25, 1986 Page \ APPRGVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF JUNE, 1986, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman — -- ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Conr(ission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City )f Ran,ho Cucamonga, at a_ regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25tK ,,•y of June, 1986, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Resolution No. DR 8c -09 June 25, 1986 Page 5 ENGINEERING DIVITSION I. The entire width " 5th Street, from Milliken Avenue to Pittsburgh Avenue, shall he improved. 2. The parcel map relating to the Master Plan shall be r recorded prior to issuance of building permits., 3. Private drainage easement for cross lot drainage shall; be delineated on the parcel map, or provided !�y GC & R's. CC & R's shall be approved by the City Attorney and recorded concurrently with the parcel map. 4, Slope easement for Tot grading shall be delineated on the parcel map. S. Vphicular •ogress and ingress rignts shall be dedicated to the City -,n the following streets: Milliken Avenue, except for openings as shown on the tentative parcel map and t :ie entire fmitage on 4to Street and 6th Street. 6,. Easement for shared access shall be provided ar,d be recorded with the parcel map. APPRGVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF JUNE, 1986, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman — -- ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Conr(ission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City )f Ran,ho Cucamonga, at a_ regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25tK ,,•y of June, 1986, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: S w A O F� P E G L Chi O •_ S y E -c •.I. ' 1 �, a EE r C l r Ib a+da �• O s� N N° oe } i _ 7 q • E 4�-8 d' O V d Yf N b.c «io L d q NE O 4 y q L O V V V�.q i N� p y 6 E a q 01 E .a zs z . u o” o Cana ^J L a° C^ cY cM t TOYrj . L H` c NTW 4q CdO E. �. > a ac ryEC u.T '• aQ wA au E_ T i iE 9 YJ. #am 4 J 9T V p=aM a q� O Ca i y d J i CL Y bra Wq ^L 9� d C� r q�E 4Ua YT qu... ad O. a.�4a o }° an ^RdL mc>' a.aa' o« O 0.q •^ C C= 0 Hq� N E y L yy d C � �..r •� a np � B G U ~ E ZL} t.CY � dy.� NC. ni a11L}}G OE C > d SO�a9G CA �•". V C 4 4� r o d 4.0 N ri .. L 0NVq a2 w „Fr I-ooan {c uZ 6V e+3 40 m HZ0. w S w A O F� P E G L Chi O •_ S y E '�l -c •.I. ' d u9E R �, a EE r C l F u C a+da �• O s� N N° } 7 N 4�-8 d' ait N u a O iii L a d O V V V�.q i N� p y n OCq,i Ldq. a .a zs z . u o” o q 1�Iti 11 z1 N A Y 4 = • a 4y"I Cd �� E. �. > i ui0 }y '• dN 'y d 6 /•w�' jjjj 1ec- t60 C q� O Ca i y d J O a n d ¢ d d 4 d C V Y L i C,«^ , j. '�l bAa OrW aQe- 1iN¢uc �QA 11 W9d �oY G oF�p M C C .r ` G o. 6.•. E V C'"d'� �. ^ b =z La u b� ; r t D yw C a q W W b q A~ j!j! Y p Wu Wu�Ud b db nrrn� p d b a �qA E .` n pb � I ? Rd t t a u W.G Oa+ aTi N yyy -q L.p qu nl q< L W d- l a a T11 pa >E'QJ•SUL r>�.� P. • nw by ^p - .• �� ^•.- d Lb R N . L T G L4 y L 9 V •L.1. �NF pNwL •LN6L �� y�r t�^" bW �' �� �_t .ER CJ •n CLR r`�.F N.0 ENWA b 0 V� UU ^.NW d bgrLLd �t l� bu L t ^gip i0 vCa NW d. 7VC ti ��N U� • b -S �c .R 9wOL �M 01d^ aJ EN Ay C WN >� PV A` .•E^ ^Nbo ^^ aw ?rNtdUN B C ,�! C v.P Y.0 LpL Op L d a N� N gbeJ f+ d�•r• R ^ q� p pa 3 EE N C L� V:=9 ^-0 R K^ rp,r t N W ab q Pm cL uW . D9 Lb d ^p d G 2 cA C WC bdb 52 • Vo W T�Nb A bW, db WW �>.?:•� >•^- •wN.Y> y Lw a ;Rp 29 MN a.�. oea Ld. A.E.eP as +,RW4 b 3 CE.A+�ld Hf SnvW Vlw Nrr�ri; Yv=i Z's ti � of CC � 6�NN Wr +6 lur ^j ^ rlf N Y OC 6L�.rpu,i] N66 rlf Q Ip f U f w q O c b C W N' N W at d •y : < cp wy S ^qq "4a VbmNPS Wc� � a NU bvy aLU ; � LAG^ .G^ 1CJ: Lbb ^N A EC y d >OQ^ a E Vd L>• EAE w� q Lo r4p 3 ti • /-K LEy= . -�.p -q t., 4�'CC U I Y N.EL ryY Ra w O ti6 wl L. SCE b�� Y NLS gLwyru �L..Ep 'a N.N V< E b.� •-.+>A L-^W yd daLd ql ~qCE NW'4T.?A.N U.� _ bRN NdNT b.•w �g7awiM �r N A4 Li ACY riO A ^p y4 6:P2 .N dQbd YL CN_L ^ _ Ty GG C Y.m b NL P> Q• C C C` q. aT L NF 7 W b p Or O nNMpN r J f C b 91•p a MWW pArj ti Ww C�b t t> O Y 'b Y q C W Ore C q YdG dwN L 4 �. d . q«-NO G `C .O W Ec1V C r4 -, � gowWac r mb b J C s bb Z6tb WO. .Tp Ed u C yn G niM� L1 G { Y b 4X_o Sjz .. L..; EE NSa� L N dy LwH G'�� U b qG V U NNQN C - bt � c b ZC YC g.a 9� Wb Q C Y `y tr m qpb gg4.1 G a+ bF Gb W P Tq > �isa4 EE p 4m6.c AA brA1 ° C 'tS ^L L _ Np � -t'�ta ¢ry..a vsrUS.4 W p 1 nWrbYU cii -iwb nW m °.�bLr•.L -:eE - tlfq 9Yrpn Wp6api fiT 4N LG6.J p �= ..r..�¢ ice e...+.q <rac f I f 1 1 1 1 k I f M cg- %- cx do - -o 2a a CZL o.n �y M Lp. w�11 u;m A.U� Ly us qp tLS d ugLd yN 01n- O _ ^ Y qU N rn � L • + 9 9u L >L� � LO d uo NW 9 C°L T ii r0- nNa1..'u°i µYn ,q„ _ � qn qua•=, vau n.cnc� w y �N 1pE y9 u.L y'L O 3c nd.°+�v m w � FF6 W � a�u0 °- C1 4' p1Q�° a9 AE=w q9'°^C ^9C v y �c�cNw AML W0..4 A�..m 69N hG.nn 4U W9 IL--O q ¢G6 pL dLLVOO � ¢N6q W66y Vtu y. \ \\ 9 I W `= o �.>< o °N �-va•°'o °o.� 'a a, 3'o =� q we c' ai- O O O O L y Y Mbq ac C GN U eo vo. on`LUa nv �� uv°..e �a ?4y� t CCU O1 u q i r 64Y N ta - q4 da0 V dy w a L ,-cn aa d b tL. 'd qL .01 \ Cc = L ��^ _ �G 6Np V da ^7 qu. >+ dY�uO V • v.-EOa w> c L � c •+v •'+'° °.. _nun o ,cc iaan•a _ M cg- %- cx do - -o 2a a CZL o.n �y M Lp. w�11 u;m A.U� Ly us qp tLS d ugLd yN 01n- O _ ^ Y qU N rn � L • + 9 9u L >L� � LO d uo NW 9 C°L T ii r0- nNa1..'u°i µYn ,q„ _ � qn qua•=, vau n.cnc� w y �N 1pE y9 u.L y'L O 3c nd.°+�v m w � FF6 W � a�u0 °- C1 4' p1Q�° a9 AE=w q9'°^C ^9C v y �c�cNw AML W0..4 A�..m 69N hG.nn 4U W9 IL--O q ¢G6 pL dLLVOO � ¢N6q W66y Vtu y. \ \\ 9 I W 4 ,R' �i ,'L Y Ypi vE be y_6 r°.oad gN1dLL � E � �vay LNN •+i..�L y�v .no vT ....TE E Lv. CU 1 - d ca L¢u i qa� ay. m' t cu N o. •� L ��� v ° c�6 C3- n O C ^La n oCA cam} b r u u C •j ., L V.n n u€ uN coq^ ., Tt a. L w rn Nu TY o�=E E d I -4w.L N A 4 A�ngL �I 6r A�•-6. w nua y N � • I • 1. �� W� �I w ci.� `S Y 3 n. d u b V E A n qd L ,d zae ao �^ i -cam cU oy. x � q� Ny c � •� ECG LS yy- v cu n o a Ny ° ^O w9 AA qda HE u 4u ud rY° LOY x' YNC UN. ♦fiM + C p C'9 �i ,'L Y Ypi vE be y_6 r°.oad gN1dLL � E � �vay LNN b C A� u °OR .no aiq nj n 1O.a u ^NLL d T 'c 'f.a •N^ m� C m' d. .. a'NNUL Ym xV Gy d.,iy ppE u ` L dr > NY 4qL O C ^La n oCA d`� oyE �yi Cb C .L+' n c a N6 i' VN a A i C q N ^may n u€ uN coq^ o d LL rn u�C TY o�=E E d I -4w.L 6u� 6�aa w �I 6r A�•-6. w nua y N � • I • 1. �� W� �I w Y° iy C Eni 6 =a N L aM �� c °to E N d V c c qa Yy a ° O u c'� T - T nzb � q o c¢c c E ° O 0 Y iu Lo v ° Ed � a M No ^o o C ° Em dq >z E Noo Lai 64.m -%rI 1 Ln F y_6 u� wL - LNN b C A� u °OR .no aiq i am nom � ^,~EE• m� C °.0 d Y d cLin �LLUN L NY 4qL Cy O 4 t: N6 i' VN a A i C q N ^may L �a ^Y. m Y coq^ so Cb N D ocEuY N N= T To. N ]L ° °. uq� ci.� d4L L °nom T O � u ica rnE L W O E �.•'i.. u. WE3 Ep Ep L> d O dYY. L O -%rI 1 G Z u ax G r o.`� co cq °iwz Or4lrq OC'^�O �.q cN ,aaE Fa �d aR L Nom. do EG^'dn q Q 0 c'ar. N p R�q FW` _a p~rc a �E 6 T�pq y q 01 tT d as _ y IN :M W�'•�u c o� oa`q v d i.. Nm^ - ca d �R as p0 �1T D Y` N \ cb T• aQ M� S d N C � N N GiC01 6 Os = C Z ^,TZ' a l uc r � $ L O �O nU td .^.0 L qy T,p aq r)� L dL ^qVy 2w � �O NY�rtLdYO.Y c .7 qw� N Y dgr�w a`c � .ap N6 1i � Q w eF Mr .° m Tq 4 y. u . E 4 b q3y E3 M b G w _ CCL.c "' yD dE - C ¢ c"t sw �• �` � mN =oea. i Yr N _L _ V:NW nu bM L 0 w+.0 yL c r LOq �4V ^ »" aoao ao_cG d' qp a i-,am Eoau ab�'a as ca =w ow°. «N Llv <m. ` a�nLa $v N 11 :53 Y'�' u0 aE OG.�N'Ym OQ 2t v w1 Au 5 Td mO^� �Yf..a. Nm^ - ca aQ M� S d N C � N N GiC01 6 Os = C Z ^,TZ' uc r � �O nU td .^.0 aqr . b vr-y K �Y rani O qy T,p aq r)� L dL ^qVy 2w � �O NY�rtLdYO.Y c .7 qw� N Y dgr�w a`c � .ap N6 1i � Q CCR O eF Mr .° m VN y. u . E �:qaa W i dE - C ¢ c"t sw �• �` � mN =oea. i NOA _ V:NW nu bM L 0 w+.0 yL c r LOq �4V ^ »" aoao ao_cG d' qp a i-,am Eoau ab�'a Ma �q N 11 :53 Y'�' u0 aE OG.�N'Ym OQ 2t ..Y.L Au 5 Td mO^� �Yf..a. Y�O�CM m 4. OO.Y Y Y�O tY9 Y. y. y w Nd `.CCU q vaiVVin rte-. a' 4rLe .e p py.. ErO-i VOa A 6~ Cu Nl �I 1 �,1~?I Z Y V 0 0. N z�a u v L L `oa,o u v « p79 3 C. c ^p r C N o N� C _ .,•pP C yY yjw c .• A O 1 °coo .Yi y =L� a✓ «.P.s ,n Y .. x %t i7 •+ TnLRI 6 � VPCX Y. y' Y� r rT NQ9y M V- LyL.q� C �.�EU tr� SRw � Ny qcO S C n= � oc� Zvi E` fitt.. � a ^v eA•Yr n g �.C6 U G R Ey 6 up Cr.G q4 e� u y LW R` .RCN a6 �C NY u'^ <• �.± .r Ou yEEi �.'. n. q,Ryc aua•ty. ua'" Eye. uj• 7P N.�k.R M ^u 6 aG� ^_ `uViyyY qCl�^ ClL 4L0.NC v .P OU .O "' Y j� ,tr ap IS bW y,ti -..LAY NP ctl Cu�yN A N b CV iCAw w^° . -ZEE S E=E NE . di B, u =i " • �C y �' `n O U ':•` =+• �t '"w ..,� u po+°, c c t"m '°o i r, v o >,a ••v °. �Ny as c rn ud79 yr v LN Z'u :} u1 °may, La c iN N RY.. `> N`m au.'c «.y A9 34 q.W Tr Q6N.y MO+•� N'LP 6V« KU Rr WHNi LLI yy' V9 Q Iz ^ Y u Y pµ00 Eai % c qOr W .r ✓�v^� � . D +O ay M u �•:•� ESj'a O_L. U G O L C F Y>rID 4P.0 L6 ac d>r z p6L.O N vE �t hd Nc rY�N yt� EE ^t y � N.0 CO Nv u asap •R6 Zn L Y M v Y=om '.� EEL Or ar v c cr = ao G ^cp T Ci K E E a. NO Yd .r E'O SV c c F6 ° 'c° N � w Ly ° •,° -..- o ten. PL oT r¢T ^z QNS .n... S O E W T� L d � a � L w i w Lod v ik N N P c coo 4 � _ 9 6 v � LYO YE d' o mwvu O i�Q g O O' W CS f� 12 •i > O \^ula Q= a Y .,� '^ ^✓ Y u N iJ tr ppFg d O t+0 Y u O G` dppa Qcn. y'r.. �ti •� G Y O V N O. L Q 0 Y � •dam 6Q N Y ^. d J O C �6 O' NC Ud 272 o- y t i q +• W G N C� q Y G • C L 6 �Y r L LQ L L r a c0 «s C �N s. p °pq fd G�� Q q N 6Y QQdd �Se d 4�C CO 4 i 4d O cta A V• !r to �u 4 LUUW q L� S • L V' O n qQN a n �Y cw ~� L C- 4 = N - _ uqZ uL S �O 4.L EL CL q N� v •^O• C �S d F c t>ty d U Y L U q N 1N t"ys n6 O � 6 t O d n• v c c U � b d ��3t' G Q tdi J L dtVq � �t 26 � 6Ei ££O wttr�i iif � 4 L.o k c Zti n ODU t 6 d= �L. c0 n LA tL Y c G^ Q•� C~ U� L N > C w{. LQ n q Y r t LY OP c d �00 L N O' C iTQ CN ^W pW EE' Q r -wu • ME n N !h G� 4 \ 11 b A m P.. H 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAYI,� t'GA STAFF REPORILA r I DATE:, June 25, 1986 T0: Chairma7 and Me:ibers of the Planning Commission FROM: grad Buller, City Planner SUBJECT: TRAILS On May 23, 39$6, the Planning Commission held a discussion on the status of Trails and the proposed development of a Trails Implementation Plan, The Planning Commission unanimously directed Staff to forward to the City Council a request that ,rails be given consideration in the 1985 -87 Work Program /Budget. the City Council at their June 5, 1:986 B•jdget Workshop concurred with tine Planning; Commi!;�ion's request anC directed Staff to prepare a report with budgetary estima',es. l Since that tima, Staff has had several meetings with the Community Services Department to develop a joint effort on this mater. The Community Ser-f4ces Director and myself have concurred that both der)artments must be actively involved in this project, but that one department should take the leadership role:, We believe the Community Services Departm t would, be the choice in heading up this project. Their depar` Hat's long rank1 goals and objectives sYell as their, 1986 -87 Work Progrej.4 and current staffing can better facilitate this leadership role. Staff believes that it would also be e4remely helpful to develop a Committee to work with Staff on this matter. Staff recommends that the Committee be cw.r)rised of ene Planning Ctlmuission Member, one Parks - Z velopment Coo 'scion Member, one Community D, :vdlopment Planning Staff Member, and .:rmnl,ity Services Daq�,artwent Staff Member. RECCMMENOATION: That the Pienning Commission re;lrw and consider the ire�ecct on ^ t fined above and dire t Staff to prepire the City Col-ncil Report. Res. "Y sub ed, i Brad Buller City °fanner 88:dak ITEM K