Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986/07/23 - Agenda Packetmall i 4M ccw��. cz'ov MY OF RANCHO C-COMMON'GA PL GANN NING QQN,,jN ljssiQN 'AENDA .)WEDNESDAY July 23, 1986 7:00 p.m. LIONS PARK COMM17X7Y CENTER 9161 BASE LINE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. L Pledge of Allegiance IL Ron call Commissioner Barker Commissioner Rempel Commissioner Chitiea Commissioner Stout Commissioner McNiel7— lIL Announcements IV. Appwjd of Minutes May 14, 1986 V. Consent Calendar The following Consent Calendar ita.,,rq are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be e,-!.,tw2 an by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anymm7 ha." concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. A. DESIGN REVXEW FOR TRACT 12237 - IRON MOUNTAIN SKI `,TREA - The—Des-ign Review d the building elevations and footprints for three (3) lots within a recorded tract in UTe Very Low Density Residential District (less than 2 du/ac), located on the north side of Sun Valley Drive, east of Hermosa Avenue - APK 201-463-11, 13, and,T13'. (Continued from July 9, 1986 meeting.) 13. VARL'.NCE 86-04 - PANNON DEVELOPMENT - To reduce the minimum corner side yard setback from 10 feet to 7 feet and to reduce the front yard setback from minimum 18 feet to 14 feet 6 inches, on a 9.75 acre parcel in the Low Medium Residential District (4-8 du/ac) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Highland Avenue - APS 201- 252-23, 26, 26. (Continued from July, 9, 1986 meeting.) C. ASSESSMENT FOR DZVEL3PMENT - , MO REF1EW4ai WJ5 i A -b-14, Nf,1J: PARTNERS, -The developmert ,Q of'i �tuldings _of 6,5):00 squate feet etch on 1 acre of lan21 in t he Industrial park District (SUL;:=t a 7). �ozw. ed on the sough side of Aspen Street, between Utica and .?Red Oak- a-' X 208- 062 -11 and 12, 1 D. JIE ;IG � " AALY - 1 , .' � L1esiSn Itevie*' to cevi"se fare tiviidirig elevations for Tract 118 "5'3 consistffilg,of 72 condominium units on 5.71 acres of land in the yf0dium Residential District (844 du /ae) located . on the .north side of 10th Street at Ramona Avenuex', In i addition, the epplia ant has reggested a Tree Removal Permntit to remove 27 out of 91 Eucalyptus trees - APN 202- 171 -42. E. TRACT- 12238 - CITATION - Design Review for Lot 11 of ` Tract 12238, a residential su4divislon of 18.6 acres in the Low Residential,71Ustrict (2=4 dufac) into 78 lots, lt,.,:ated on the west side or' Heilman Avenue, north side of Church Street - )ON 208-073-1 through 42, 208462 -1 through 3, ;5 through 9, 5 , i1 hrough 24, 34, 35 and 208- 172 -1 through 5. VL Public Hearings The f040wing items are public hearings in which concerned indfsAdua,Ts may vo, a their opinion of the related project. Please wait to br"`,recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating, your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5;minutes per individual for each project. F. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT A4-09 - AMENDMENT - LDS. CHURCH T request to amend the approved Conditional Use Permit allowing the installation of four 35 foot high and two 50 foot high light fixtures for the northerly .Wtball and soccer Melds located at 6829 Etiwanda Avenue, north of Victoria Street - APN 227 -06 -65 and 23.. (Continued from June 25, 1986 meeting) G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 9986 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGt. -To pr p Tde r;gltl -o -w y { or the-'Widening of Hermosa Avenue between Mignonette and � 19th Street and the extension of Hamilton Street. from Deer Canyon School to Hermosa Street - APN 202 - 201 -08, 30, 69 and 71. { i i ~ , i 1 H. EI�Vi�i7ONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 10008 - liliYEft TE'CFL CENTER - A division of 3,265 acres of land into 3; parcels in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) located on the west side of Utica Avenue, .approximately 500 feet north of Jersey Boulevard - APN 209 - 142 -18, 25, 29. 1 - <, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMEIv"T AND PARCEL iV1AP 9946 - v WILLIAM LYON COMPANY - A division of 18.78 acres '.o _ land into 2 parcels ifiT Victoria Planned Community _ = located at the northwest corner of Base Line Road and ' Victoria PaPO- ane - APN 227 - 111 -12; 13, 28, 34, 35. ' J. ENVIl1ON.MENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 9829- � LEWl$ WOMES OF CALIFORNIA - "To create 4.36 acres oY land for a park site in tfie Terra Vista Planned Community, located at the northwest corner of Spruce Avenue and Elm Avenue - APN 1077- 091 -14. K. TENTATIVE TRACTS 13057, 13058 13059 AND 13060 -- THE WILLIAM LYON COMPAI3Y - A request to amend the conditions of approval o� r previously approved residential subdivisions totaling 57* , lots on 96.36 acres, generally located south of High1k 1. Avenue, north of the Southern i Pacific Railroad right of -.Say, west of *V Aliken Avenue, and east of the Deer Creek Channel - AP14 202-211-13, 38, j l L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE - PERMIT 86 -12 - WdST211N SERVICES COMPANY - The establishment of an automobile leasing c fice in an existing building, with a lease space of 3,750 square feet on 1.66 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 4) located at 9375 Archibald - APN 210 - 071 -47. M. DEVEI +OPMENT AGREEMENT - SCHLOSSER FORGE - An agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Philip D. Seh;'osser, Elaine M. Schlosser, Albert Holquin, Jr., Robsrta J. Holquin, Jeffrey P. Schlosser, Jacquel!n L. Schlosser, David M. Richardson and Gene M. Richardson, regarding the future development and current operations of the industrial facility on 27.7 aeres:.at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Rrenester Avenue - APN 229- 111 -05, 17, M and 18. N. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12830 - CITATION - A request to delete the regtdrement to finish the 45ad end on Garnet Street as a cui -d".9c south of Tract 12830 located on the west side of Beryl Street at Cielito Streete 1I� . Y VIL N6W Business O. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW .86.13 - MESSENOER -The development of acre industrial Master Plan and Phase 1 and 2 deve:09ment consisting of 7 light manufacturing buildings totaling 139,000 square feet and 2 warehouse distribution buildings totaling 43,400 square feet on _22 acres of land in the General ircdte 'trial /Rail Served District located at the east side of Viney4 jd Avenue beween Arrow highway and 9th Street - APN E09- 012 -16. P. ENVIRONMENTAL ° ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86 -14 -HAVEN 121YESTORS The development of one 11,750 square foot office building on 1.005 acres of land In the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7) located on the east side of Haven Aven;�e, approximately 550 feet south of Civic Center Drive - APN 208- 622 -35. Q. 'PRELIMINARY REVIEW 86 -49 - HER�QANDEZ - A 2:ons stency determination between, the Foothill Corridor interim. Policies end a proposal to of tupy an existing house for tt?, operation of general retail sales in the General Commercial District located at 96ji Foothill Boulevard AN 208- 153 -12 and 13. R. APPEAL GP MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86 -08 FRIEDMAN - An appeal of a condition of approval requiring the undergrounding of existing overhead utilities fronting the project, located on the south side of Jersey Boulevard, 700 feet east of Vincent `Avenue - APN 209-: 143 -28. V11L Commission Business DL Public Co^amsnts This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those whic;l do not already appea;^ en this agenda. X. Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative .Regulations that st in 11 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, tti(-,y+ shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. The Planting Commission will adjourn to a special meeting Thursday, August 7, 1986 to discuss Haven Avenue Median Landscape concept. The meeting will take place at the Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center, 9791 Ar. 4 Highway, Rancho Cucamonga, following Design Review ComrAttee meeting and will begin at approximately 7:30 p.m. ' I I I ry MAP i SPHERE OF INFLUENCE H1 sro ivit sow .,,,... ..rl -. W CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA► ►► PIS" r, 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCJUgCNGA STAFF REPORT 0 0 F � Z U >` 1977 1 DATE: July 23, 1986 TO: Chairman and :Members of the ?fanning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 12237 - IRON MOUNTIAN SKI AREA On July 9, 1986, the Planning Commission reviewed the building elevations and plot puns for three lots located within Tract 12237. Tne Design Review Committee and Staff had expressed concerns over the grading and tree removal that would be necessary as a result of the proposed one story residences, The Planni�ig Commission rceived all input on the project and deter,ined that the grading and tree removal necessary for the single family residences would not have a significant impact on the surrounding Brea. The Planning Commission referred the project back to the Design Review Committee for additional analysis of the building elevations. Ttfe Design Review Committee has reviewed the elevations and has referred: this matter to the full Commission. The Committee also directed staff to presfnt to the Commission photographs of the existing homes in the are: fn order to determine the design compatibility of the proposed units with those existing in the immediate neighborhood. _ RECOMMENDATION: Attached for your review is a Resolution of approval withiCondit! ons relating to the Design Review for Tract 12237. ReVAQgtfully sybm- tted Brad Buster City Planner BB:SM:dak Attachments: Resolution of Approval k ITEM A RESOLUTION NO. A RE-SOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DESIGN RMEW FOR TRACT NO. 12237 LOCATED NORTKk� OF SUN VALLEY DRIVE�, EAST OF HERMOSA AVENUE IN THE VERY�� LOW DENSI"Y RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 26th day of March, 1986 a complete ap:Aication was filed by Iron Mountain Ski Area for review of the-above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 9th� day of July, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Comm-issior held a me'etfng to consider the above-described project. follcws: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga PlVanning Commission resolveA as SECTION 1- That th4 following can be met: 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed� use is in accord, with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and 3. That the proposed use Is in dompliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Devel��ment Code; and 4, That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties o improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That Design Revi,�,w for Tract 12237 is approved subject to the foTTo-wing conditions: PLANNING: 1. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a detailed plan showing the location of al 1 trees to be removed. Removal of trees shall require replacement planting subject to review and approval by the City Planner. 2. The unit proposed for Lot 27 shall be relocated a minimum distance of ten (10) feet to the east to avoid disruption of the drainage easement. _3 , WIT KAN NG CQMbtISS4N PESDLt1lI -�, July 23. 1986 OR for T12237 - Iroil Maunta 'rt r k ,ski Area'- Page 2 h' ENGINEERING 1. proof of a re0orded drainage easement between Lots 26 and 27 shalt be re aired issuance of building permits, $ prior to the APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAT'OF JULY, Y986 , 3 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO GuCAMONGA BY. :. �- r enn1 s ou , ---r- ATTEST: ra u er> epu y W -e ary 1, Brad Euller, Deputy ecrF:tary of the Planni•n, Commis, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby cereify that the foregoing Resolution ff f was duly and regularly introduced, passtMi, and adopted by the 97anning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of July, _484131 by 'the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMISSIONERS E. NOES: COMMISSIONERS; ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: _3 , lu x°x .a CrTY OF RANCHO CUCA MONGA STAFF REPOi_�T DATE: July 23,.hJ86 TO: Chat rman,`and Members of the Planning Commission Fk,,M Brad Buller, City Planner 6Y: Cloward Fields, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: VARIANCE' 86 -04 - PANNON DEVELOPMENT To reduce the minimum corner e setback rom 10 -feet to 7 -feet, and to reduce the fron ard setback from minimum 18 -feet to 14- feet 6- inches, on`ia 9.75 acre parcel in the Low Medium Residentinl Distrii (4 -8 dwelling units per acre), located at the northeast Lerner of Archibald Avenue rad Highland Avenue - _APN 201- 252'3, 25, 26. Related File: Tract 12914 I. BACKGROUND: an July 9, 1986, during a regularly scheduied pub, c Tearina, a Planning Commission reviewed staff's report and Iistaned to public testimony regarding the Variance request. After considerable discussion, the Commission determined that the findings were sufficient to Justify granting of the Variance request to reduce the front yard setback frim 18 feet to 14 feet 6 Inches and corner side yard setback from 10 feet to 7 feet. The Commission directed staff to prepare a:,R°z lution of Approval for adoption at the next Commission meetin. II. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends• that the Planning Commission review an adopt the attached Resolution of Approval. Res c fly su ed��.� --; ra l er City Planner BB :HF :ko Attachments: Resolution of Approval ITEM g i' RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RAN! ) CUCAMONGA PLANNING COM:+ISSION, APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 81=04 TO ALLOW REDUCING THE CORNER SIDE, YARD SETBACK FROM 10-FEET TO 7 -FEET, AND TO REDUCE THE 'FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM 18 -FEET TO 14 -rEET SIX- !' INCHE:, WATED AT THE `aORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AND ` HIGHLAND, IN THE LOW - MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. APR; a; 201- 252 -23, 25, 26. A. Recitals. (i) PETER LADER has filed an application for the issuance of a Variance, No. 86 -t/4, described above in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject variance request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On July 9, 1985, the Planning Commission of the .City of Rancho Cucamr, ,, conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the subject matter of the t, appli Mon, and said public hearing was concluded prior to the adoption of this Resolution. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution,, NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of -the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 11 t. This Comm ssion hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A. of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced July 9, 1986, ';searing, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically find; as follows: a) The application applies to a 9.75 acre parcel in the Low - Medium Residential District (4 -9 du /ac), located on the northeast corner of Archibald and Highland. Avenue; b) The properties to the rjorth, east and west of the subject site are presently designated for residential uses with west properties are currently developed with single - family dwellings. The property to the north and east of the subject site is designated for residential uses and is currently vacant; PLANNING COMMISSION RES6LL'TION July 23, 1986 VA 86 -04 Page 2 11 c) The application has been submitted to allow the reduction of the corner side yard setback from 10 -feet to 7 -feet for Lots 1, 57, and 77 and to reduce the front yard setback from 18 -feet to 14 -fee; six- inches for Lots 55, 56, and 78 contrary to the reouirements of Section 17.0 °:.040 of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code requiking front yard and corner side yard setbacks within the Low - Medium District to have a front yard setback of 18 -feet and corner side yard of 10- .feet. d) The variance as specified in the application will not contradi;A the goals or objectives c°f the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan or Development Code and will not pro,-not( a detrimental condition to the persons or property in the immediate vicinity of the subject: site for the reasons as fol l ows: 0 ) The project (Tract 12914) has a greater street radius standards of 35 feet, v.,ich is larger' than City Standard of only 27 feet enjoyed by other projects in the same district. (ii) Recordation of an addendum to the CCAR which would restrict any parking in the driveways in a manner that would obstruct the sidewalks and curbs as well as providing those homeowners with a setback of less than 18 feet witn a garage door opener, (iii) Strict and literal interpretation and enforcement woAd deprive privileges enjoyed by other, developments within the saiie district whereby setbacks as small as 8 feet, 10 feet and 12 feet weee approved and units built. (iv) At the above- referenced July 9, 1986 public `r ;Mrng, no public testimony was set forth in opposition to the application. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced July 9, 1986 public hearing, and upon the specific findings of fact sit forth- in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows, a) The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of tt.e specified regulation would result in a practical difficulty cr unnecessary Physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code; b) Thera are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved, or to the intended use of the property, t'zat do not apply generally to other properties in the same district; c) The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by owners of other properties in the same district; is d) The granting of the subject Variance will not constitute a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION July 23, 1986 VA 86 -04 Page 3 y e) The grahting of the sLbject Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to r— erties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application with the following conditions: a) Provide automatic garage door openers for units with a front set back of less than 18 feet (as measured from back of sidewalk). b) Provide 2 foot high return wall and extensive $` ldadscaping along the curb radius and side yard of Lots 57, 77, 66, and 67. c) Record Tddendum to the CC&R's that would restrict paI<,ing in the driveways for Lots 1, f 57, 77 in a manner that would obstruct the sidewalks and curbs. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF JULY, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ennis L. Stout, chairman ATTEST: Brad a er, , 3p —trly secretary I' Brad Buller, Deptcy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the planning Commissior held on the 23rd day of July, 1986, by the following vote -to -wit- AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: RAI Ell k CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 23, 1986 TO: Chain0ln and Members of the - Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Debra Meier, Assistant Planner GHQ C���M�9 J), n C j C Uil >' SUBJ'CT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASS':SSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86 -15 - e development —of two office Foil dings of 5,OW square feet each on 1.0 acre of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7) located on the south side of Aspen Street between Utica and iced Oak Avenues - APN 208- 062 -11 and 12. 1977 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Actior Requested: Issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: or - Office Park un er canotruction; ISP Subarea 7 South - Vacant lots within Office /Tennis Executive Center; ISP Subarea 7 East - Vacant land; ISP Subarea 7 West - Office building; ISP Subarea 7 C. General Plan De%lgnations: Troject site - n ustr1a ark North - Industrial Park South - Industrial Park East - Industrial Park West - Industrial Park D. Site Characteristics: The project site has been rough graded and no structures or significant vegetation exist. Streets are fully improved, parkway improvements will occur along with construction of buildings. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is requesting Environmental Assessment or the construction of two office buildings totaling 12,000 square feet. The site is part of the Ranchft Cucamonga Business Park Office /Tennis Executive Center ap shov. in Exhibit B. The proposed site plan is consiste:,t with the conceptual Master Plan. Upon approval of a Negative Declaration, the City ITEM C ' PLANNIND ,cO&mMzdN,1rAFF UtdRT UR 86 -15 - Alliance Pa�tners July 23, 1986 Page 2 \ Planner wilil grant final approval of the project based on ^oilditions recommended by the Design and Technical. Review Committees. B. Design Review Committee: At the July 3, 1986 Design Review 9m1 ee mee rlg, a applicant presented revised building plans. The revised plans addressed concerns expressed at a previous Committee meeting. 1. Pedestrian Connections. '(he Coitmitte4_ expressed the necessi y or pe es ian connections from the- building entries toward the south. This is necessary for two reasons: 11) it provides accen-t to the buildings from the bulk of the parking area, and C2i it provides access to the easement that leads to the tennis courts. 2. Architecture. The Committee did not recommend approval of orig na ui ding design in that they did not believe the architecture to be In character with the goals of the Tsttnis Executive. Center. The revised building elevations provide a variation in height and mhlding treatments and the Committee recommended approval at the Juiy 3rd meeting. 3. Landscaping. The Committee had recomtinended that the propose6 andscape palette for this project be compatible with other approved projects within the Tennis Executive Center.. Staff research has indicated that the proposed plan is consistent with the conceptual lzndscape plan for the Executive Center as are other approved projects in this center. The Design Review Committee recommended approval of the project with the following conditions: - 1. The area between buildings shall consist of 5 font minimum landscaping and a 4 foot wide sidewalk. 2. Roof mounted equipment shall be screened from public view. In addition, all such equipment shall be painted to match roof top color in order to mitigate offensiEe views from nearby multi -story buildings. 3. Provide a sample of the proposed window mullions for display at Planning Commission meeting. -' 171 PLANNING COMMtSSIOK `S-, AFF REPORT OR 86 -15 - Alliance Partners July 23, 1886 Page 3 _+ C. Environmental Assessment:, Part I of the Initial Study has bee!'. comp le appVicant- Staff has completed Part II of ti ' Environmental Checklist and found no significant adverse e.ivironmentil{ impacts as a result of,this project. If the y Commission ,, ;oi, „urs with staff findings, the issuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order. ai III. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends issuance of a Negative e1 cl ar'a �►� on for DR 86 -15. _ Respectfully sub ' ;teell q � Brad Buller City Planner BB :DM:nS Attachments: Exhibit "A” - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Master Plan of Office/Tennis Executive Center "C" Exhibit - Detained Site Plan Exhibit "B" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "E" = Building Elevations ..;i :4 t 1 � °t �• � p t i a< • 4w4 #T' pm bloal t t 8:'rD q.•R + = awe .met -aa P. At No. b725 Wo s �G I f � i PM � 7?I✓t I 'It 7494 .ry 't. ' x.� 17 1V. 6911 a, 1 A h r i •: ! >9T ' 1 M)RTH CITY O RANCHO CLCAJvlU'--','GA SC LE- r� •a �n NORTH CITE' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA i0i+i Trrr E: � .�it.� PLANNING DiVI5 E:'CH[Blis �; exiatmacon nNO 00rcFh want tRI MINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN LEGEND ('/�)'� R1Nia1{iN hCFh•CUa � pTCapbN[ F�aptaNV\ aC[Nffpll A. �i� r� [UGf[fliU[1'q TANfNE Wh lA(1FnpihCF/UA MpICn ha \C.a!\ Y[I.Ytw WD\ \YD �Y'll \ImIR\ app bf1CVNOCCY[n � eFnaaa`ena arnpfYMUNfM .+151 NOT [ i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOINGA rcrLE, PLANNINU DIVrSKIN EXHIBIT- _ ..�' .SCALE._ lWOt1.OMW RRtIRgR.I.R.� 1RC'4�1� _ — • �""J'jY o�Jfy «'fit AM ...R n NORTH ELEVATIOt uro.m.,nnR.nan,.0 . mrnum 1-4 tier a[r Ilium WEST ELEVATIO a.ro•- C TIT OF w Px ANC-IQ CLCAMOI`GA TPTLE. � PLANNING DNISK)LN E DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT orUCAAaol,q Ln t a J 1 c O O F z U vuly 23, 1985 19777 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Howard Fields, Assistant Planner DESIGN REVIEW OF TRACT 11853 - DALY CONF*QUCTION - Design Review to revise t e ui ing a evations or Tract 11853 consisting :+f 72 condominium units on 5X acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8 -14 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of 19th Street at Ramona AvenaR< APN 202 - 171 -42. I. BACKGROUND: The subject tract was approved in 1981 as a total residenti—aT development. Daly Construction received approval from the Planning Commission for revised elevations and floe- -plans on October 9, 1985. However, due to marketing factors I and concerns over long -term maintenance, the applicant is requesting revised elevations. The approved elevations consists of masonite siding, composition shingle, and wood plant -ons. The new proposed elevations comprise a Meditteranean style of architecture using such materials as skip trowel stucco and S -tile roofing. A. Action Requested: Approval of revised elevations for Tract 1160.1. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Existing' single family residents and the Foothill Freeway right -of -way; Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac). - South - Single Family Residential; Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac). East - Church avid vacant land; Medium Residential (8 -14 du /ac). Wes; Don Miguel Apartments; Medium High Residential (14 -24 du /ac). C. General Plan Desi nations: Project ` ite - Medium Residential. North - Medium Residential and the Foothill Freeway right-of- way. South - Low Residential. East - Medium Residential. West - Medium High Residential. ITEM D PLANNING COWMISSION STAFF REPORT ( TRACT 11853 - DAL., CONSTRt�C ION July 23, 1986 Page 2 J(' E. Site Characteristics: The project site has two existing i4 residents which wi 1 be removed or demolished. The property slopes uniformly from north to south at approximately 4% grade, except at the north property line where the southern boundary of a steep knoll exists. The site is a former citrus grove with Euualyptus windbreaks along the east boundary line. A _ Tree Removal Permit was filed by the applicant indicating approximately 27 Eucalyptus trees stated for removal with 11 Oak trees to be preserved (see 'attached tree arhorist's {, report). Additionally, staff will be working with the tree arborist in preserving two (2) 24' Palm trees and a 14" Oak tree (see Exhibit 911). II. ANALYSIS: A. General: 'this proposal is for revised building elevations - only. The site plan and building footprints will remain unchanged from the original appr. *al. Buildings consist of a two- story townnouse design with attached two -car garages, and all units are comprised of two and three bedroom. The proposed elevations are contemporary Mediterranean in character. , with varying heights in the roof plane utilizing a hip roo'An combination with a shed roof feature. The proposed room material is "S" the with skip trowel stucco on the buiiiding exterior. B. Design Review Committee: The Committee reviewed and recommended approval of revised elevations subject to the , "allowing: 1 o A variety of decorative trim detail on garage doors to create interest. o The use of window mullions throughout building elevations. o The use of slight color changes to exterior stucco on buildings. The applicant responded by making arl recommended revisions to the elevations. III. RECOMMENDATION_ If the Commission concurs with the Design Review Comm ttee, then approval of the attached Resolution would' be in order. i 1 •I •I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TRACT 11853 - DALY CONSTRUCTION July 23, 1986 Rage 3 Re tfull ami , Brad Bul`ier City Planner BB -FiF: ko Attachments; tree Aborist Report *` Exhibit "A" Vicinity Map ' Exhibit "B" - Approved Subdivision flap - -:-. Exhibit IIC" - Approved Detailed Site Flat«, Exhibit "Q" ,- Elevations -- Original Exhibit "E" - Elevations - Revised Exhibit "F" - Floor Plans Exhibit "Gff - Roof Plan ' Exhibit "N" - Tree Removal Plan Original Resolution of Approval #81 -128 wi New Resolution of Approval with Conditions richard P. johnsor i horticultural comiltants June 4, 1986 RFr. c r-: S. D 7Ul'41 ? 19db Project No. 85,170 Mr. Jon H. Kawada MGK GROUP 1558 North Case Orange, CA 92667 SUBJECTS Native Tree Evajxiation Removal and Protection Guidelines for Trq.ct 1x.853 Rancho Cucamon a. Dear Jori:� A second visit to subject site was shade June 3, 1986. Those site trees evaluated as low in health and vigor and/or Posing potential danger and liability have been appropriately marked with orange .loresent spray paint to recent area grading it dill , Due be necessazy for tree removal crew to check all sides Of trees to ascertain marking; many were quite difficult to approach from on. side or the other. Approximately 27 eacalYPtus are slated for removal and all stumps. All site castor bean trees have been paint tagged due to their extreme toxicity. Any citrus trees (all are stunted) can be removed. Extreme caution should be exercised, however, during citrus removal as several small oaks are interspersed among them and these are to protected. Large oleander pushes can rely n if You Incorporate them in your design cor--o you wish to trees located within the tract 1r' Only those marked. removed. Due to difficult in eperimeters are to be Y =tablishing exact boundary Of project the ossibilit r does exist that a roximatel�� eucalvPtus have been narked for removal that are not nart�of this nro�ect These trees are located at the extreme f.ar and h� nd of the field and flank a small citrus grove. Tree removal contractor must be cautioned to stay within Project boundaries. In three instances sucker growth Only has been sprayed for removal. In these three cases paint sprayed 'R' does not occur on the tree trunk, sucker growth branches have been sprayed instead. have is s 1435 glenneyre s#reet ® laguna beach, 'ca P,o. box 127 * lagor4q a beach c(-) o ,56r, r7 z n-� x 07 AI A , Project No. 85 -170 Tract 11853 June 4, 1986 , barxe 2 This report will also offer some mitigating measures that can help offset the negative impact that may occur Prior to, during and after development. Present Status of Trees: ' Many of the Windrow eucalyptus trees have soil piled above the natural grade which will eventually smother and kill them. Extrz soil should be pulled away from the root crown of the trees - down to original or natural grade, Remcryie the soil back to a minimum of 3 feet :from the trunk. This should be done immediatel There is a heavy amount of deadwood but, overall, Proper pruning and carprtheseespecimenslcanybe good h ndsomehandWith healthy trc.s_ Based Upon July 3rd site i:ispection, site oak trees show ievidence of fungal disease or oak pat scale. There are a.nfew insect pests present but nothing s.gnifi ^_ant and I would not It e Xpect them to be troublesome. Site oaks are guercus a�irifolia (Coast Live Oaks). As a general rule, all oak trees are known to have very shallow mots, perhaps in the 1' extend to great distances to 3' range. Furthermore, roots can , often well beyond their dri.plines. This is particularly important to know as development, even it occurs some distance from the tree, can impact the sensitive feeder roots located at the extremities of the tree's root system. Compaction, in particular, will reduce soil oxygen with a resultant slow decl;_,-le in the tree. In order for you to becc %te better acquainted with this have enclosed an oak tree d tree I -detail sheet the tree's rooti . Basically this shows ng system and overhead structure as well as its sensitive zones. It is important that all those working around the trees become acquainted with this information and that every attempt be made to avoid unnecessary impacting of these sensitive zones. PRE - CONSTRUCTION PRASE Site Tree Removal It is my understandin that existing site trees. g you plan to remove several of the exercised durin It will be important that care be g these removals to ensure that those trees that are to be saved are not damaged . should some damage occur it should be evaluated and remedial ,3ctivifiy effected immediately. A delay in this area can cause £wither good plant tissue, A tree pruner should die-back of Of any problems during this removal ld be °n hand �o take care phase. Where Q °.S Project No. 85- -170 June 4, 1986, Rage' 3 eucalyptus are badly crowded, remove the weaker ones. * practical experience may be Some in judging the distance to leave between trees; thinning of this natural stand will probably need to be progressive. As the trees become larger and require more space, remavrs interfering branches and trees no longer in good health. Pruning Pruning will mainly consist of the removal of deadwood and stubs< Accepted standards of flush cutting, drop crotching and tree wound sealing should be implemented. Tree spikes must not be used when climbing as this can create wounds for disease entry or insects. A, well trimmed tree will never look stubbed back or lopped off, enhance instead the tree's natural growth habits. A standard industry guideline for pruning is to remove not more than 1l4 of the total foliage or branch structure of a tree in one trimming. Pruning dramatically influences branch growth and some tree trimmers drastically reduce the size of a tree by making large cuts because this process (called hat - racking or butchering) is fast and easy, requires little skill to accomplish and returns a large amount of money. Trees trimmed in this manner regenerate many poorly attached branches which are even more prone to breakage than those removed. such Pruning will decrease the health, longevity and value of the tree. Quality pruning is typified by a tree that does not book pruned to the untrained eye. If is obvious that a tree has been pruned, it has probably been pruned incorrectly. Excessive thinning or heading bac}; can reduce the leaf surface to such an extent that the tree or branch cannot continue to manufacture sufficient foods for its needs. avoided. such excessiveness must be Fertilization F`erti,liiatM would be best performed prior to any construction activity, Due to the age of these trees, it would be wise to deep feed them a week or two prior to pruning or any excavation Work. Properly invigorated, the trees will be able to better resist any impacts imposed upon the!- by construction. Apply organic fertilizer, by soi1 granular application. Use a fertilizer containing cottonseed meal, blood meal., bone meal, and manufactured sludge in approximately equal proportions. Mix with sand for ease in application. Formula consists of adding tree height in feet, plus crown spread in feet, plus the circumference of the trunk 1 foot above the ground in inches. Examples tree 40' high, plus 30' in crown spread, plus 30" in trunk diameter will need 100 lbs, of fertilizer.. For a tree this size it would be best to apply in holes spaced r feet apart. Make holes in concentric circles around the tree at —(e Project to. 85 -170 June 4, 1986_,_R!4e q intervals of 2 to 2 -1/2 feet as far as the spread, of the r branches. If any fertilizer remains after the holes have been filled, scatter it over soil surface around the tree and sprinkle immediately to diffuse the soluble part or the fertilizer and make it readily available to the feeder roots. NOTE: Oaks growing in good soil usually do not require fertilizer as they',are accustomed to Ru 1 in their own leaf mold through fallen leaves. Removal of fallen leaves will interfere with the normal maintenance of soil fertility. Roots ,f can only absorb food elements in solution; if the .^oil is dry, it istimpossible for roots to absorb soil minerals or plant foods. Hence, the need for applied fertilization. These above items would be best ggrformed prier to any major construction or additional grading so that the `reps are at :heir vigorous best prior to the impact that development may have on them. CONSTRUCTION PHASE It is extremely important that all parties involved with the development of this project become acquainted with the material contained in this section as they, collectively and / individually, will have the 91-evtest impact on the trees. I 1! recommend that a pre - construction meeting be held to acquaint them with your desire to protect these native trees. suc, a meeting wot}'d do much in helping to preserve these stands. Several types of impacts nay occur dur Most commonly these are 1ng construction activity. foundation and various. utilitvglines and fills, trenching for structural damage and many Others. soil compaction, physical usually th ^se which occur to the tree's root system;�feither are Physical cutting or death due to la2k of soil oxygen from compaction or poor draii, age, or both. Every attempt should be made to alleviate these problems. Trenching -Uti trenching, for underground lines, has a history of causing serious root injury to trees that are same easement as the utilities. Open trenches may rbetdugto the mechanically between trees but near the drip line the trenches should be continued by hand when roots encountered are 2- inches or larger in diameter. Most eucalyptus and oak tree root; must ; located within the upper three feet of soil. are he cut in the trenching or tunnel ng operation If many roots , the of the Project Ito. 85 -170 June 4, 1986, Aade 5 r F� tree must I+e trimmed proportionally. In other words, if l/; /o£ the roots are cut or damaged then l/4 of the top growth (branches) must also be removed. Any damaged roots must be cut back to uninjured tissue and kept from drying out urxtil the trench is backfilled with ansite soil,. If trenching operation is held up or to be left open for more t4t.a 36 hours, treat severed root d,issue with a mastic emul.sio:Y t6 seal out air and discourage drlring of vital plant tissue. Desian Factnrz Ideally d any construction (roads, walks, buildings, etc.) within the drip -line of the trees. Established trees, such as these, show the highest sensitivity to disease ane construction damage. The area within the foliage drip = line must be handled with particular care. The addition of fill soils against the trunk, or the covering an compaction of soil with pavement Within the drip -line, prevents normal wetting, drying and breathing of soils from occurring. Lowering the roil level around established trees will Often reveal and destr�,jy critical lateral and feeder roots which are necessary for healthy survival. The 'Iasic recommendation when working is to preserve the natural conditions within tree drip -line areas and to allow leaf litter or shredded wood mulch to protect the soil. Trees must be protected at all times from compaction and mechanical injury.. Excellent drainage must be a component in any design Planning. If done properly, It is possible that adequate aeration, water and nutrition can be-provided. maximum encroachment should be limitetoohind1O�rofltne trunk and should be performed under the supervision of a consulting airborist. ons_ it a Factors Due to the variability of root locations, soil factor and individual tree peculiarities, I can operations. only generalize. Most impacts %ill relate to root damage during cut or fill Based upon the above possible impacts during cr>nst uction I suggest that the following mitigating measured be Implemented. 1- Invigorate trees, as recommended earl,_ to help build resistance to stress. er, prior to :impact r i Project No. 85 -170 June 4,1 386, Wage 6 2. If possible, fence trees at their drip -lines to protect them from injury during construction actf =,ity. Strange as this may sound, tying a bright, yellow ribbon /plastic band around the trunk of trees during construction period does much to the added awareness of their presence on construction crews. 3. If grading or cntistraction is to occur within the tree's drip -line such activity shoUd re performed by hand implements as heavy :equipment is most damaging. Some arboricultural supervision should be present duc..Zny such sensitive times. 4. All roots greater than 3" that are cut during construction encounters should be immediately f:Wsh cut and covered by soild or a tree seal. Damaged roots should be cut all the way back to healthy tissue as grading or trenching often breaks or shatters roots. S. Special design considerations should be imple..cnted for either cuts or fills around trees. 6. Any sail area that contains tree roots that will be exposed longer than one day must be protected f•om moisture loss. This can be achieved by watering and /or p"Iacing a plastic trap over the exposed soil area. Construct retaining walls or backfill excavated soil ar:. immediately cv avoid ioisture loss to the tree roots. 7. If tree suffers trunk or upper structural damage during construction it should be treated immediately as any delay can cause further tissue die -back due to desiccation. S. If construction activity causes severe moisture loss some irrigation and /or mulching may be neede1. In no case should water be allowed to sta.ad at the base of any of the oak trees. 9. Extended construction often causes considerable dust collection on the foliage of trees. When this occurs food manufacture is reduced for an already weakened tree_ If this becomes a problem washing of the foliage may bpcomi necessary. Although these items highlight the activities which may be encountered during construction other problems may crop up. In that event it would be wise to have a consulting'arborist Project No. 35 -170 F June 4, 148 page 7 r ; ". available to advise you rjith your field decisions and to ensure that proper arboriculture practices are effected. POST - CONSTRUCTION PHASE v Transition time from natural undisturbed environment to f urbanization is of great importance to established trees, It is important_ to monitor the trees for problems and to evaluate post construction maintenance. No amount of proter -tion prior to or during the construction phase can abcalutely gL-arantee the survival and continued good health o*2 impacted native trees. Therefore, I strongly recommend that these trees be inspected every 6 months for a 2 -year period of ter c nstruction in order to give tLara every opportunity for survival. Even with the best of tare construction will impact these trees and some set backs may be expected. Pest problems, in particular, increase due to the weakening of impacted trees. These and other problems, can be identified and dealt with during the monitoring period_ Established trees can benefit from periodic deep water and light fertilizing through the late spring. Since evergreen oaks are dormant in late summer and fill, they should not be deep watered during this Period, as they can be stimulated into growth, and be prevented from having a needed rest cy le. On a broad scale, I recommend the eucalyptus trees be fertilized by soil application within six (6) months of r— nnstruction completion. A final light pruning may also be in order as it's . safe to assume that some additional branch die =back will occur. I strongly recommend that when tree care is turned over to others that they also be given concise guidelines; easily readable and understood, regarding the care and sensitive nature of these trees - particularly the native oaks. If you have any questions regarding any of these recommendations please do not hesitate, to give us a call. sincerely, RICHARD JO SON & ASSOCIATES Richard P. Johnson, ASLA Horticultural Consultant RPJ:ds To i _ JK/2/ G.4T� Jay 4 %;Y/NN, TONE r �k' :C'G2bTF'UN <CJey �;�v T S q e L COAT Tom 1 ` 7ZD8' G+�SCyL a AVOIL'� iz2IGA ?iCn/3 �s 7�iyo W�YCrvp cX1CT /obi .4N� G�IMPAe7?on/ ZL- WWI X�q Irk, - a rn, Zk 0 U Z� CN b 115 TENTATIVE TRAPT NO 11353 SITE UTILIZATION,, ,),ID RADIUS MAP L 41 J. - .._ �, O .rrnr..r «a...n(. � �'+�....�.. ( �I -� r -, R 1 r q � � � ` � 'G `•i rr� 1 °�. ! c FORTH CITY CT RANCHO CUCAIIONGA ITEM: PLANNING DIVISION TITLE- :_VdTl.VT t 11 1853 EXHIBIT - N t! SCALC a I P.3, ian5 Y I 1 NORTH CITY Cr ITEM: �-ANCHO CUC I-VIO °GAS TITLE U 53 PLANN1NG DIViS10,N ' EY!—liB1T:�SCrtLE��_ 1 lit 44 SITE' QE1T F!T {.WOFaM fafAU. •�: a �" � i+W[t �TrSt yyrty 4Ci RY 2Ctf l.. ♦ MJN —� �` • t) �, �t1/O�C ��y yei: lii C/)sK[f.IpapC) - - IH r+rreifi. %ssM ! �ar..i•I+RnNr. cM11)i1 5 IxTay.l. errs '. Y.CJia ) yp�. �. f9�wQ,w�4a s�.fr arcs NAHa...,h} .�Y,'R, ``;y +'n..rrs�!•.x.� +w....t. -nom.. '.. 'sy .tL ! _� ""tfraa ! ^�.; � _ � 2'C•Cxt �fn.r.n _Ll � r-xlrl f..�. = i I SITE FLAN 1 -- _ _. TYPIQAL BUILDING PLAN r FORTH Cl-f Y OF, RANCp CTCAO1,�i1 TITLE: PLAININING DIVIM.N F'CHlEgT. "r f° t5 ----_ SCALE: tiF TTY Or iTEc� L RANCHO CUG MONGA TITLE, PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT D SCALE: D41, .°.�., D— l%l�`" 1 i I I. I I —M a� CITY Y Or, ise�t: RANCHO GLTCA IvIC� \rG,. TITLE: PLAT NING DIVLSION E1IIIf3iT;" r Li SEAR ELMA-110N fRmE a"Anm [A Ak RlrAff -10E 112MON NURTH CITY OF RANCHO CLTCAj,-,nN GA Trf ge� PLANNING Dn4SK)N EXHIBIT: • M�LF. 19 14 U WFtST -FLOOR- 2JI Clly OF rrENI* 77 Ile - RANCHO CUCAMONGA TrrLE- D[VMON SckLz,. NORTH CITY Qr, rma: T PL.A.\NL I \G DiVTSK)N _90 ' ''--� _ SCALE: . 'may tis.%ri� AT� _ tIt� W v �15�•- 1/ r MIAY { :ant o�ri f ri, rzw „� craws v,,a,r7t,u, an -- wend;, :. r.: c.•.:a;�r..rw.aafw..mHn;w�+y'u+ �atun �atett7'er'] NORTI-I CITY or, C PLAININING, ITV ^^yy (1I1?.`j`c t. +r RESOLUTION NO. 81 -128 A RESOLUTION OF THE/,PLANNINC COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU.C41ONGA, CALIFORNIA_. CONDITIOVALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE "TRACT MAP NO. 111153 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 11853, hereinafter "t -lqp" submitted by American National Housing Corporation, applicant, for the M purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a residential development of 72 Condbminium dwell%;s on 5.71 acres of.'. land, located on ;the north side of 19th Street at Ramona Avec�ue -APN 202- 171 -42 intr" lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hP4�t.rh§ and ae,t_;on on October 28, 1981; and WiiEREAS.. the City Planner rods recommended apprival of the Map suuject to ail conditions set forth in the Ent- Divisions and Planning l' Divisions reports;. and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and onsidered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public ,iearinq. ?, NOW, THEREFORE, the.Plann,' ^p Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 11853 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of devel- opment proposed; (d) The design of the subdiv';ion is not likely to cause i Substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative Lract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquire;4 by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within { the pronosed subdivision. i e•- ti M x Y Resolution ilo. 112:, Page 2 not create adverse impacts .o� the ative Declaration is issued. t flap No. _1853, a copy of which is subject to all of the following Condt- ons: ai of the patio fences along restricted to a maximum height niched grade of the building e;^pnces shaii be subject Ps nning Diyision,`'prier to t along 19th Street shall be e mounding which steps up to rock walls, as a means to recce batween the street and Lions. Details shall be in_ ndscape plans. n the east property line shall ter with a species of clean, pavibie with residential land r pedest =ian circulation system additional texturized cross - and at the main Entrance to k along 19th Street tl±all Lance of 2' from the curb, proach. laced at the entrance to the Plan Division. approval. shall have a contiguous 225 rea. ontaine within a defined area such ac landscaping and earth ion of intersection drain at shall be done per Gal Trans 'a 3 (9) That this project wall environment and a Neg SECTION 2s Tentative Tac attached hereto, is hereby approved conditions and the attached Standard PLANNING DIVISION 1, The design and materi 19th Street shall be Of 5 feet from the fi pad. The design of th t. the �pprovai of the issuance of building � 2. The landscapa'treatmen improved to incorporat an low profile natural soften the grade diffe the buildi,�f pad eleva eluded i-1 the final la 3. The Eucai ,ptus trees o e be replaced 15` on cep cast growing trers com use. 4. The continuous interio shall be improved with walks at key lasations the project. 5. The meandering sideway maintain a minimum dis except at the drive ap 5. A directory shall be p project subject to 7. All ground floor units square feet of patio a. S. The tot lot shalt be c through design features mounds. ENGTNEERIN6 DIVISION 9. Revision or reconstruct Ramona and 19th Street standards and policies. ID-4 Li Resolution No. 128 Page 3 10. Vacation of Ramona Avs e be accomplished prior.rtorecordationgth Street shall Flood protection va,;.shall be installed along east Property line to pro�ect -z ructures from overlo,,, of Alta Loma Channal. 12. A joint use driueway agreement shall be made with adjacent properly owner to the west. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1981. PLANNING Cofw4iSSION OF TH gITY OF RANCHO rUCrMONC�1 r, U, , , Sec ry or the Planning Commis I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of Zhe City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolut';on was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by thy' Planning Commission of the City of J:ancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission Leld on the 28th day of October, to -wit: 1981, by the r "oltowing vote - AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Rempe7, Sceranka, Dahl, King NOES: COMMISSIONERS: + None -� ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Tolstoy D_a� RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT ,NO, 11853 LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 19TH STREET AT i0j40NA AVENUE IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT - APN 202 - 171 -42 WHEREAS, on the 30th day of Audi, 1986, a complete application was filed by Daly Construction for review of;the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 23rd, day of July, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above - described project. follows: N0.1, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as SECTION 1: That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfa;e, or materially injurious to properties or. improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That Design Review for Tract 11853 is approved subject to the following conditions and attached Standard Conditions: Design Review: 1. Provide Evergreen tree types (minimum 15 gallon) and shrubs in planter areas adjacent to garage doors. 2. Provide slight color changes tr exterior stucco on buildings. 3. A 6' high decorative wall shall be provided along northerly project boundary. Tree removal will not be permitted for construction of said wall. Where existing trees interfere with wall construction, wrought -iron fencing shall be considered to step around exctsting trees to satisfaction of City Planner. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 110. TRACT 11853 DALY CONSTRUCTPOW" July 23, 1986 Page Z ` 7I 4. Final landscaping plan shall include planting of deciduous trees (mi,nimum 15 gallon) near windows along west elevations of Buildings 6 and 11 to minimize sot ar heat ain, subject to review and approval by the City P1 anner. ^` 5. Shade cover (i.e. j trellis) shall be provided over all trash enclosures. 6. Submit a detailed lighting plan to include by —�h high and lore level lighting for review and approval by the City > Planner prior to issuance of building permits. APPROVED AND ADOPTED 11415 23RD DAY 9F JULY. 1986. PLANNING C01419ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY. enm s L. Stout, Chalirman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy ecre ary I, Brad Builer, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of i' Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was drily and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the { City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of July, 1986, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS:' KeS: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS; G \V • � n �n Q z 1 j Cl •n S- S. O:. YCb9l� W N. G _ ♦' L ~iN C UO+. 6.aUiL. L Y Dq.O eNi�w 6Sq II Y�UU6 /. Vy M.q CO V .E 40.D� Lt lY. Cw 4 II OuS.t yw v.CV� N• 6a6t � U Y ^Y O, }w'O=Tp Nw :. LNL 6ro y. wIIt. 9� O6E`y 0 p 6��. C Ns001V pC�u Y=L .E_ ' Nm w DE �O YL n^ w.V. C'rU.6 41 g^ �}yiYUL LCd C� . 6p 3u GYD� i'y CU ,y �YY.r.M .4 D € �c9.� ECiLTu U dC 'O 'vO U ron.L nn'�' �.F Cw v01 C =�a°+p�EW ^aN yULy.4 ro ^G 'dY Y Or q 9 a 6LD Uq Y 9 � p' .CU E wa oyM 3�u 4L dO,Y NC°6 UN ... 4n"pp L= . CO n C�`�q CQ U Lpw p ^DLC Nro +N �i �^.W qti Nero ^N qV ^�yd w p ��� EE6 tL IY�U � >GYN n.•.L 6M.'sp H. �/p0 ipUa:� A ^O tm.^u�Ar bni4 �LN P,6II ^.w d.aw Ua ^^ L ]I`.•. N�L�Z4..pC n°G•V.yU IIai �}Y Ems^ LvN >� p IIr N N y gL.00.N T aL p. V U uEE1 \ y° ry NE 'C.4 E 0996 C9 U ~ U�w aC'r Ca CL UUEN .°..m U c V N °rC ° C C E a pay a °Ny Sd 6 ��oKL a qU � . T Y N H 49 F L N S w O G d Z go N K N •r d u'c °' II~ F z °0, R- 13 `\N, 3 KOgm m 2 S O O N y O. F � ^^ O 8 ° ta. a O � 2 ~ N U N •i K Q d VVV� L 0 O v 9 yu� Y g •VZ.• �L - d ' � ha qnG uwfT L V C Y AYgw 6 �- CLO L U BENS °unTiNN 4 w Spy ¢ O, E R O.5 d NO LNORdL `tN ({A, g Y u ca 9 U! K OIL aG� E° ro'u � Cp W° ifUN o�uyn�YU aO 9i CS.ti �"Y^ O lot O v u U A 4 uO OuZ; do o;�A.ggOO- .' L dV } nq n L 6 m �IQ w^ R.5 ^t r'.^ awa y .s 4 pa's w L =o %a a ' C N L w Y w w C L L C �-Jw EO.yywio Y n N ryy t s A 6� 2 N u NL w.Y N L 0 O v 9 yu� Y g r y 1F,,i Ll O `V. �od� ua Aa c >rn"'.T, c • -ds.�° dY rGd � 1 jaw �V E a t:p ¢N...N dL ao apow 2 q.y n yr. yuq b CMdd a u .- �'f \ O. U Y O T Q p Y 0 � G O y C E a a N� 1 °•2 d Ed q Y �' gN6'vd � pJ]dRa x cOL nC •1 -� .1 � L_ al A. L •• Lr- U °U db .O k_ c° 'r C� V_E� T L Z pOni ONO �L`a ^Oa 6w3i.,u. Tya as xi�c YO Qr CO Ca T O•dA 'Cx E1n �`C q° L .Y% ^.. � q �� Ey i ? U C° L u t • L d 3 •.c. E N C qy a a Y a y d T 6Ll T T NEi �y OSC TN =uuN ,^ °1 Ten a ^o �� Or °c aS' mi a q O u'° aao C A'- >•1 •- +Ei cv _'� d y�oa.N `^" Y'^ c M u v a E a ^am d° a prt C � O Ya 00 Y O Cr yr� o bl0 U^ a..q d t��L.N V .� d Y> Ygg • O t E N p 6 c U c 9 1 -.'z L C C E c C d- iaT ° d.00t dE rxLU 'O dt YNOdyv LLn. � a} cv N E au EEodLa u L mLr 26a �a nR.- a .4 E.Q vy.°._'c^ ncy nc E d a «6 P 4 U 4EYn.6 xxu. d� ua x N 1°nY L=2N YC°a E L ... G Si.wd. b Y ad dR Wry. -3 Oc 6L° vl6n Y . \ .� �I III �• ' � �NI �� �� i I Ll O xYVS.- ` L:O .d N d R Y �jt N L LaN O R 6.M r C a0. Ex S L'4 CI Y y .-5 •- �YY V Y °o.2 'al 2 t Yx° rp tr Y +.y c c T q^ caa T ac a N puY xc Lr- U °U db .O k_ c° 'ac � p:dbl`d rni ^yn VOy °�O xH O� C lac O.dN v _ eE.°- q26 ais +.YUt OL "'U NE.ii° Nu _� y L pd y'�da T caa naa qeL U'o'," AEOiud rn J A L N no dx « u G y as �� Or °c aS' mi a q O u'° aao C A'- >•1 •- +Ei cv _'� d y�oa.N `^" Y'^ a�y.V °rc d° a �T m'J t v ra c Otp trio w u N u�dV °a.L, VW ^� t��L.N V .� d Y> Ygg • O t E N p 6 c U c 9 1 -.'z L C C E c C d- L i• L a 6 R a r 6 •+ x G }- r M O p HIS 4 � x p O L °� N A. � p '. 4 U .+ a a d R M q •.. �., 'ryyxC dR F.•..mKIaC i I L+d V oar a vb a d 0� C L °' c °- CyLiY dqC �.t C q�. y ••• A >q c u w R N q dnp �d4 w0-. E L N n yL 1 46Ly y d N O,y au Y tkT na y 0 S a° o CvaLi Yo z ^� V= �y oY LOp c d�q•°. d i >t =uct FL it `l.� 4 n d 0f d4 qo 006 C. F- .O• -..0. 9 O d� E Cud ?. NadinO 0 d� ro� 0`00' m. +y LdV .Eb,�.p da^ LN a w q b U y o N •.w -4. n Y, -` o� q N y4! O�• .� � O d a ro q 0 n N N i � O O q � •O a u. y +x 4L q V aw ^.W Aldq ei w�qN min � � N mq r.0. =u ppE 4J � °EO yn •.s d s v � u.- wdr Z2 �o.'" nc�' Wq�6 � nNU °d �> �d'OO 4.0 Od n �yU Q MO 9µ nY Cy�rY ,L, Yn. x "Sr D•LL y9 q �EdV v NyY ^ ^b ECE LCU qqd yam^ N. ;2 .��,°. dq� up.. -Z v'aas ^durr ds ^ LaC^ .'nnu S ^4i ^£ O .Ua r d 'N S 6b FRM 6U 6`L0 I�nN�q vv of d L ay N c,ary C obL..o S.5 i"''q �t •d T r O µ� 4.a qo C.x .,.Ly +. ti. ,cxd �f_ rnuo md.Ne u'T'On n90 L dr o.y .+ pn � x <4t'G dd. --a� N c !gall coY YLd G 0 n•. L. qV a U nYf 1 r y �d O� qq RL q C ^d NL Nu. a y Ny.4 ^g N ou d6F �E N. CUC ... y�d�0 « N. Ot EL T 4E 0% i�L aatt O q y U d. N ZAC, • q u N y -O V =0d Nd •... � N q� p y R 6 Y.,• U C C U OYE tY .^.,+ �0 adR C..E. L.p q' NUn aq yiG• R dF4 qgf•Q rqw •G,y ��npy NG »NN $Nq Em 2 V 231w mi � °' `� n ^roL>d qaN qO. � >ub _c K.q�O CY. q0 d WOggN \ \« \ \4 L+d V oar a vb a d 0� C L °' c °- CyLiY dqC �� c 04 6 L N d C q�. y ••• A >q c u w R N q dnp �d4 w0-. E L N n yL 1 46Ly y d N O,y au Y tkT na y 0 G d t y' L L d; g q y a wLR y do Tip ddyb "'�.� FO. _ 4';d0 4 L�> q N C2 ^ d w Nq C W aU b.� N�y pi4•„ lN�� Z yy�Gy c G� v 0 YL R da^ A a w q b U y o N _OGV n Zw d n ay.4 ..d. LN • nL Onmi w�qq ^.W Aldq Odd -0L.� w�qN min b Aba Yyc q z '''y« w^ r.0. =u ppE Wq�6 � nNU °d �> �d'OO 4.0 Od n �yU Q MO 9µ nY Cy�rY ,L, Yn. x "Sr D•LL y9 q �EdV v NyY ^ ^b ECE LCU qqd yam^ N. ;2 .��,°. dq� up.. _ L Y� 000 t u0 ^durr -q'•A QuNp QpWm ^£ O .Ua r d 'N S 6b FRM 6U 6`L0 I�nN�q .a•YG .[C R. ^n1 lM6gn »`u baL tY64•+NueOr O µ� 13 � 11 J 1 L � O- ` Z f {4 V QI b i . d U lu •-^�1 .per qL C 1_ aou �+. 2 Ncx dy ¢ a d.-0` E L i�... ...+0 �C CAq Ot� rn Lea . Ny dOf E9x CO .. u n O a• ^' t�. Lt L dt y N u G _ r 1• c E u ..- o v v d c �y x .+ Y `yam nb L +•eLiL c "u an > Y o Y o c> a npp W m dv v E rnQ LZ v Ny. s.c 3e b c �.a Pra b aoi no no PEdf i upo bds zi.x�c,� f. Nd dyb L 't/1r 'E .p CS. b pILC U N y �rd �ot m CcN6 q, U NOaa O ay POa� "ZQ„ y G dP• _w.EV d O N u• ii N Ey- > q o N. ..] t U.y b U S U Y nd OI. a b 01y �^•u ^.dc V C U ZE = L NE.- , Yd OL G u> ac..CE y x C ¢ ^`rdULL �LCa y; U r d O L o A w VALE t-4-2 a na' o. uiC.• n -4 c a. u L'T. CQ'a�di cnNuo dn'.O as �. n O yb L� U Yb� d Yp P.ao.o n6 L L y OO;.1.-. nq' IJN ° rho' pc,c >m ° 3d dLn r >n 1-Q 3LILN° ad. 1-NU �1"cOiWL .o O t o:�na'�vuia• v =�°e o.c .- a]I 2 r •-^�1 .per qL C d 6 ..d-� d aou A m c E ms u» P F gaiN d �zs n2 t y o°'a T a> g v A b `yam nb L +•eLiL c "u an rn c" u,ny qnc o Y o c> a npp W m dv v E rnQ LZ v Ny. s.c 1°a E b v b c �.a Pra c c c A�� b ~ w y 1 1 t2 y w.o 2 Sbx1 dN .-.G V U Y c' n do 1° v c dL �QNq +•N b y �J Y °On . .0 dyr0 -d PN 4..N..� nb o.+ aD EiYEE ygg�o yPOy A .b-� dyYt. as d o ,u u�aaO� tTc Ly NSC ON?L E 9 9 y '� EO�C LOCdd ULL V00 O.dq� rn0 N U� LP yLL Y EnE n R. DYNE U WLLP. WE3 6OiMV Y � d' Z a a soo a°co8 aum�e� •� d 9 Na. r 2 C •'.r h-:5 P s. Y i2 L N C A y W O O w L = C W O ^ q N tz P u�N BEYE >g W 0 4 d N W A 4 H A O d C 4N q N C CYO s! N Y a •� u •O N U. u d C1 q C cc- ^ EC1r 4Y t Z :-1.1 u.. n'a.0 'O �a c u$o mn t` kf 2 v � of 9 N .c Un M qqE qY r q Y� N d o 9 ' Y@ pp y L E YnY A nv y° m C1 ° y V c N •� d 9 Na. r 2 C T 2 M oo. O L Y i2 L =go pT q of •'. <+ '19 Flo y V O yl� c L N (. A .Y dp •^-y q4 qt O a v y EY L v Lac En r Y u "Z,c u m U. u d cc- 4y > y C Y >UO yV'u0 py Y= 1;0.1 N c � 00+•W O.W •+ Va 4q YVi >TUQ Ma 4.Yr o c i W J p y K. 6Ld.6 Y A Y 2-, �C C EE N N _q L n q 01 �O =yt3 r ° s q 6 W G G q A ^� O'3 dp •^-y q4 qt O a �� LO R." y EY c 9€ u m p *O• d 4y Np yV'u0 py n t •^Y� N N� q 1 °n vi 1• Y 2F p y Au iEE+Ego Lq O ^ee y uy NN w Y AOd � OLt D--31 C�C.°C Y9y O•°..y O•i� q y Y u aaLCM LC Y yd +EE a+.L du°1GG 3�qL �"'W6d OI °« C C 9^ 9 L H ^L � d 4 1 q ..• p L° w. p 01� •+u°� °NYO Loo °u E m u �• ^ u y C 1^ d= 0 2 y Y + G N4 q AN R A L d 9 • Y u O q a u� L^ •°+',°,%� _ �u. Vin., °u U y 6 Y at E L uCC �Lt vOi Ea4O4 _ � A a q nna Et y ° o"•_ e r° uT'a orn`°MO o Y G O, s C Lp Y N d W y C L d Y y Y L y r u£n£AYga i1JL= � w+ u 3 0= y N C q a N N A A V » 9N+• 6 O O O C-E+~L q c u CM rl Zr Zt €f Lm We Y A. a i.L. v a vi Au ,.r J � N�wd 00" - a n l o .n z BE Ao yqj LO N M2 6 N y v4 L .� O c C d L m W U a. v 9. G � d A c ° p0 e V p� u C X wT L A a p W d e L rnp � S it d E 3 a ¢CL 2-.:s '^ RL rL� -�°•• >. z '� r U Ta Nax ° T drnc N "•L °Em a. LW c.:. K.Q ate+ .u- µ �: g � �.=ianu °� ccll¢..c .ns c 9 U- as .o �.r. 'g aU C. ° au"i c '1.• .i X- N.O LA Ld LL O nw a, ^n V dVG >�b rnK L u N yu 1 cyi. a 6.yn PE par 9..-in .bw pq rn Q q.:>.Y y Nuo EE a Cp Y.L L =FpC m 1 d GAL b VE 6- a. a .l. L Cd 6. Op 6 La+Gtr p, A 4 yT;S- r� \QO ^W.Sr E.a, Or TaC YL ud yAb V V 1 Y - T N ¢W m� T. =mob K6Nap+ NOrriM EE y�y t• YT ` �a CN \m1 ha' Ku 6r W ywiL iU ia K W rl Zr Zt €f Lm We Y A. a i.L. v a vi Au °i c n 'e m E rn v 4u.na o d - a n l o .n z BE 9 .µV d C wT b N wa.y. NV O. � W ca . a of = ^ate -moo NN aµi N T V µ F d E 3 a ¢CL c4 l' a d a a 'u E 01 O L c v n � N ud K u _ RI d C t u'1 G L a L f• d c u m L L L d µ O n " c ar' i m p na+ E 6 L N C C T _ d b G u S n O �qw cN i T� L q o,n Obp. a L �y O L o ^ u E arv.V �i� O Z v b S 0. i 1 d L ua S1 H! ' c ` � ua L x vtl u a5 o a y .°. c e^ a Ntl Y 01 ,r, O S q0 AY �� y •.� d E C O L C N A o N Ez L q N C 3Y4t Sy Yy qN -.2 4L p 'a OFT ErNt O� "S N I tz Y 9 T L y • 0. qa u^y at t 6q N 2� pY q� •' a OY F Y y a nq Y 9 6vY F vx ° G OS Ly tl pr Uy .Tm Niw 9N V ° o vs i y aLi L L � O. s o ya• •- 6O mad+ y a Ta u LL. 8 � T� L er. a tl aTiY u y L Ly Y ° Y 9 y .4E 6 �L v °M.NC 4N _Y L �tl >YT • r 0 N.o 6c ^ aZy L q C q ES N.e q� 2-5 ti q q q°w v CV • Y rGY ^ °w r O Tali pr Dy^ G .84 C qYyy O ff® Lpp.Y? C pL ^ d L aCi' WM as alp °c Y� •) q m t m O+C-: VI 4w N K Y. O K' L Hr J�' O NI MI fl NI �� �� fDl .4) p U O A O O O � V W L � "u Y Y a a• ca a� �S v a nYa r q q LL ^ n •-v Y NI 9 ^u n qv 1W � A Y � �SW w _v= y ^N om� «aT 11�y O' ° N Y ` U q aC� 9qJ Ov uY yu •C 6J Ua a°• « a°i q �. d _ Ly L M ^U L F LLyp O Y N O CN N L N L q N a L � q2 yy Sy Yy qN -.2 4L p 'a OFT ErNt O� "S N I CLU --;i NYQ ", ° <. �Y d qE L N qa u^y at t u I1 O q� •' pMb OY ° 4 V G OS U L 9 F 6 a G 4 d L i y aLi L L � O. s o ya• •- 6O mad+ y a u LL. 8 � T� ° er. g� q a°.• 4 u .aT e NU5 y y V • r 0 O N L L q C q A_O q q q°w v CV • y�i N �F =p y V U N O G F..® L q L q m t m ZIE HY-y :°N KM �3� � ••Tqr LY 6Y • 7 OIIYOF ^ STAFF REPORT �^ ' 0N W� 1 DATE: July 23, TV: Chairman an4Members of the he vq _an-n.`n~cn- m_i�_*-on FROM: ��0dle��ty���r BY: Brace Cook, Associate Planner sUWE�: ew -for Lot 11 of Tract 12238, a —residential subdivision of 18.5 acres in the L61 Residential Dibtrict (2-4 dwelling units per acre) into 78,lots, located on the west side of Hellman Avenue, north side of Church Street - APN 208-073-1 through 42, 208-162-1 through 3, 5 through 9, 11 through 24, 34, 35, and 208-172-1 through 5 l^ Citation Builders is Design for a house plan <1251> for Tract 12238 (the "Hill gate This new house plan Is for a single lotonly, Lu:- '�) . � Il- A. G Citation Builders received Design Review ] TF-om--Effe- Planning Commission on Decamber 13, 1984 to construct their "Hillgate" homes on Tracts 12238 and 12530. 'The original Design Review approval was f,.r thr--�i (3) house plans, i.e. house plans 14":, 1523, and 1707 (the model numbers reflect the floor area of the hcuse plan). Since then, Citation Builders has also purchased Tract 1283o, located on use west side of Beryl Street, north Qf Base Line Road, and it is thel--\�nteit to also develop thit tract with their,dillg4te sign ~ Review approval by the Planning Commi�gsion for, Tract 1430 �ias obtained oo March 26, 1986. In addition to the thr'-- (3) identical house plans approved f6r Tracts 12238 and 12530, the .'_....= _'.~~~.,. also approved an addadditional *"v.m' rvurxn house plan i.e., 1251. Citation Builders io now OeaiQn Review approval of this house plan for Lot 11 iv`-act'�2238. Previously Citation Builders has fndYnute8 their intent to use the model hmme sales office located in Tract ' ---- - -- the --'^~ utf'ce for Tract 12830^ 11 is located to the existing model home complex for HjllQat, and the house plan to be constructed is the one house plan not ye- - v -uil�that is � he offered "r sale within Tract 12830. ITEM E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT' TRACY 12238 - CITATIO.N BUILDERS.: July 23, 1986 Page 2 B. Design. "Review Committee_ The Design Review Committee red',iewed this proposal at their meeting of July 17, 1986 and ha3, n^t recommended its approval. The Design ReviF uammitte-d was reluctant to approve a floor plan change for ju >t one lot within a 74 lot tract. They felt tha3, just the single house would net be compatible with the unit mix for the remainder o the tract. However, the DeFign Review Committee also felt it undesirable to approve this new house plan for additional lots within the tract. The new house plan is significantly smaller (1251 square feet vs 1439 square feet, 1523 square feet, 17J7 square, feet for the three approved house plans) and the Design Review Committee is of the opinion that construction of a number of smaller homes woad be unfair to the existing residents within the tract who purchased their homes with the committment that i.= surrounding homes to be constructed would be of a particuiar :snit size. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS• In order for the Planning Commission to consider appro;r� al, the following findings must be made: 1, That this project is cG„sistent with the Development Code and the General Plan; 2. That this project will not be - detrimental to adjacent properties, or cause significant environmental impacts; and 3. That the proposed use and site plan, together with the recommended Conditions of Approval, are in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Development Code and City Standards. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny this request per the findings made by the Design Review Committee. If the Manning Commission concurs with the Facts for Findings, adoption of the attached Resolution would be in order. s Ct fully Itted, , ul ged-1 ty ,canner BB:BC :.ko Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Area Map Exhibit "B" Tentative T.-act 12238 Exhibit "C"' - Tentative Tra4t 12238 - Approved House Plans Exhibit "D" - Pmjoszd House Plan 1251 ' Letter from Citation Builders, Dated July 8, 1986 Resolution of Denial , } 1 1 i r•'r� --- ���CtL�Q i ti� y it r( it c CITY OF RANCHO CUCA� 1L �iGA title; A uz ENGINEERING DIVISION �' -Ifl•� t361t VICINITY MAP .. N PaBz A0. 122387 r REITATINE i?ACT_ i %lrf WMMULMo UUU MEN MIA LINTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFO IltnriRiY rNI:' . rE.,uttGltlfRtea ; ":OI! 01MU .. E Mt a nn.xaw.rr, r•w t u n! m+p,u.aar �ra•,c � tiflilt r!lrEEB/Y'fltt.ru r. _;i a f, , �° � T:31rErrft\ S1REkil. r ''y � •' `® �~� °Ff' 4 _ � � , N ✓�Y, _� tot �AC-3 § T •?�--�� t ar.}r �H 7,t aipt r, m��n.way�iuma� /- ^t Emmil lEErn ---�• �,�p"�' -,�„ , ice, GEKErlL rOiFA: V ; "L � as rWi r�swea vwrMfl, +nwls .. l t 11 pa,nrYl ,s,r. a -i•. -. nrr.^t , w+aram^ RANCHO C O CVT`i iMO,';VA PLANNING DI gSla -4 7t t i= t gyre r i f i ,f f roamw \•rte � �— •. SNLF alp} �•�br '.i FORTH E, HI BIT.�'�j`�_SCALE Im 71 54 70 55 24 -43, 69 56 LU 0 s -9 39 j 28 r 66 57 a. 67 at 58 JOS' i? 66 59 136: 31 7e 5 1! 60 23 '9 81 8 A l 32. Zi X3 63 62 17 Z LU —1 LU lu 6 Z. . JO 1:10 IL -` J- .-.?CHURC-H STRFET2,..--. 5 rf,tv LaT v VA4A.r Qfz CITY (21F a , RANCHO CUCAIMOINGA TrrLEz * ) PLANNING D R r SKIN EXHIMT: 24 -43, LU 0 t , P, 3 24 4.r a. LU 7e 23 '9 81 8 17 22, 22 4r: 21 6 Ic Dl� no ct 1,4 /S V 4 18 s '3 17 Z LU —1 LU lu 6 Z. . JO 1:10 IL -` J- .-.?CHURC-H STRFET2,..--. 5 rf,tv LaT v VA4A.r Qfz CITY (21F a , RANCHO CUCAIMOINGA TrrLEz * ) PLANNING D R r SKIN EXHIMT: - - �• .� {,}�:�.i ��.�' Ate+ s" i' n' ��ss �t �pt •. a� • • -�� iii �_� � ' d} . u !� ; • i e if U. K► zil J i � �' 1 - -v-.__ - ---- -- - -- ,,:�,t• :�7 of C.. yF 10. I• tr MIN ¢• S q°D is I f? ,r«i �• .•_ * I Ct �� R "- z ao. ^ °rte s k a 1 - =�• \ c�� it O'tl�j .�•� «. 9) ILI .t +t ot 616 n�� {`r. • Li d ♦] 't � d - ..,,�,� i t � • • _ � 915 . -7 _ ] . � __ ac 1— �'•','�-_ -- Vii' t�• .. !t'_i � • ` y4 I � t T' �a {•q - �_ �—• �� {{{'• �i its]. iii ������ C I Allr - %ua I {.{'I I I { 21.1 :�:,,� 72 ti F i B� a II 1 •.`> ..;lit% Sr:d.'i t l -- —T 5r t t +t:z t t I I � . �i. 'r:�•. i St rF� i-] Ra t {.{'I I I { 21.1 :�:,,� 72 ti F i B� a II 1 •.`> ..;lit% Sr:d.'i t l -- —T 5r t t +t:z t { � �'—�- d- +-�-zt c..t� �r•�"�..'� -.� � 'c r+!®/lPaiesraic�� .�.__.{ . i....9 I. u i { IJ i __ - ..� -; ...444 ..� ��(( •�� • �•!a.� � {� +� Q~'' -. i�o I ' � `iD �g•���% i L�3 �, :ate -�-! i^ £: F' ` , Y �::..._` =.� ... • -• ' � [� ale � � y�x� I � . s ulrl ., 37, }� t�h'• Z ��'�'iii -i' r.'.S.S�• • f y -mod T. �y lam' 4`Ti { ,��' � '"4� � ��,•' .yam: eL rl T-1 al _-" Af u , dll i �C t J^ •x ' ice' � �1 � , •. 5. . •'::till .. :r � - � .. •�: �, ; .. . � III � _ . 1 `,�r� ,' �' -�_� �'z >• � -� • -i � r 4�s� ,a ^- _ ' J ...... ter. . Hill �' 1 Tr c y �. �• {„mot ®� r f — - -` � .ssi 3 . a.�,— .r// �'1 �y w .� 1 4 r i. a \'2 �C,- „l•.�'',�<d'�i ' ! ;_ r°C.,��e. i �! T ic++ �� Yr!e.`�«a:.tr "tecn.+•.�4a..d -7r�. _ � ��+..� w, .w+.' .,.'Y4Z'sT. � • � J r Zi f 7 1 Sp. Tki C,%It I'. Z,,Cao N. alu • It di pal qu scan � ILI CN jdp r t 1, � �� /, f f) li`_ �Q,: er `�� i •• 1 •. � a eP €h p cr� 5� 1 - Q. _ ` r i ,.� � �( ily:a v � jp f . I Y`.? •fir .. .� .► T �. a3 •f, EE IOU _ k. I — • b i 7, 3. , p I1 ?T I : 0 R t .I i t } ij ► � � 6 ':� L 'fitt � o —o ! ^a • MMIM"na J71 I LE D j LFL--Il -411 In 4 o 'Mra% IT QVISS �. ;;, i � �� � ��`� �� • l F i I • I t �i 3 i z "— ��„ �C►i1�i�' Gam'' 1 J I Tj Z. <Ltj Qf .7 LLL� III C a.Lu i 4i 7 1 tz S3ti E N z- -4' as p Vol; MCI md MET ES ' •F �� w ��° "''� r { 1 Fit; �i � `1 } � � � C} 4 � i 3i1 - njtr}�I\ . L__!�� s" _... .. � •� it _ d - �-•- -- _� ' ° Y �G�AI�� � f: i `� iil•{ j I f I.f ���'�I ��L: � � �-�� � :� = =-a.e �� It �- � � �t- � � . � ^• - .7 _ ffic Lu F7 C L ! r la �j y }4c 17 r� - I - r 4' 8 .t R7� N hill! y Y -- _ 'a gip" t'�•jz.. i II1 "i�1 El t Rj_�: L N gi �(� --- 1 t' • �y s Y Y � °• I � ii as it$ I.; atd r I I ME .p� I ' 11 i j � � � "� • AMIN. P-911m, is if 1. g I I It t 9 j j, is f, iz t S i it 1'e. j- zl ;. 3; Pi to IN ic 20 no au Iml 11 gl ui LU 93 IL kIZZ46 ? z O ■ lUr ------ n t -1C%l Z> t. Ar kIZZ46 ? z O ■ lUr ------ n t -1C%l Z> du;ao- ! i ' LU t � 31 I Ct j • �� - I i i � Imo~ �,7 ,7 . W. fill LLI I�JW Ap t - II ;A I W CL LL F�•, 1 \ CTI( i r #. tI it JS. 1 it •I /� la. Ul 4 � a •' r4 i A Vol k •: , nip `p\ � t 1 - 4" CI N, Fw '(. n- III } r1.4 f 4yi �na3 MI n GR 'tl 1223'!S - 4" CI N, Fw '(. n- III } r1.4 Lu LLJ IL tL I ai> .. .. •j y tf At 1 t �1 j Lu LLJ IL tL I ai> .. >., SUUe No. 201, TUSTIN, GA 92680 (71A)731-0141 f duly 8,,'1986 a Brur,!� Cook City or Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 9320 Basel'iile Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91330; REF: Tract 12238 Architectural Review Dear rir. Cook: I have enclosed our check for $251.00 for an Architectural Review of our 1251 Plan for tract 12238. A, au well know, this plan has already been approved by the commissiati l a.d this process you are insisting an serves no useful purpose other than to fuel a zeal for bureaucratic procedure. In any case, we would like this matter 'to-be heard by the Review, Committee at it's next meeting and the commission at it's next T /eeting also. Sincerely, CITATION BUILDER a partnership y F. G LL'nton, Jr. ' Development Manager _ FGLjr:sf cc: Pamela Wright, Council Person City of Rancho Cucamonga 0 E —Z7 °RZCLIVELi_ Cny OF RANCHO P CUCAMONrq U+NN1Nr1 OtY1s•oN APA JUL 1886 $t9i10�11�12i311�►4�5�s S RESOLUTION NO. 4% % A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO- QUCA,'NQl10A r,LANN1 (l� 1MXSalOti , DENYING Dt ON Rs Ixld FOR LOT 11 OF Tkg� , �38 LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNS -R OF HE A`1EnUE` 01) CHURCH STREET IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT ( ;I ('�:� WHEREAS, on tie 23rd day of July, 1486, the Rancho Cucamonga - Planning Commission held a meetiTy to consider the above - described project. follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as SECTION 1: That the following cannot be Inez; I. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and 9 2. That the proposed use is in accor4 with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the rite is located; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable whereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That Design Review for Lot 11 of Tract 12238 is d-agied. 1. This approval is for the development of a single house (1251) on a Lot 11 only, 2. This lot may only be used as a model home subject to - the adoption of DCA 86 -02 by the City Council and subsequent to conformance to the requirements of DCA 86 -02 for the establishment of an off -site model home roles office. rk. r� �ry t R1ZNG COt�.�S,I�r ��1,1'`i�t tip. �4 , TR 12238 - C�iL"ltiti RU— July 23, 198_6 Page 2- APPROVED AND A:0000 -ReD TKS 23R0 'DAY OF JULY, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION OF T'H'E 'IrI tbF RANCHO CtlCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. u , , al�r�tl ATTEST- Brad u er, Deputy Secreury ,1 I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancno Cucamonga, do; hereby ortify that the foregoing Resolution:.was duly and regularly introducedy passed; and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission herd on the 23rd day of July, IS, B6, by the =following vote -to -wilt: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 1 11 1977 DATE: July 3, 1986 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Associate Planner SUBJECT; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -09 - AMENDMENT - CHURCH OF LATTER DAY SA N e request to ameno the approv Conditional se ermit allowing the installation of four (4) 35' high and two (2) 501 high light fixtures for the northerly softball and soccer fields, located at 6829 Etiwanda Avenue, north of Victoria Street - APN 227 -06 -65 and 23. (Continued from June 25, 1986 meeting) I. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission, at its regular June 25, 1986 meeting, ing co ducted d public hearing, received public testimony and continued this item to this regular meeting. The Planning Commission, concerned over the noise, light and glare environmental impact to the surrounding propertiest directed the applicant to submit a noise and a light and glare study. The purpose of these two studies are to further analyze the impact and to provide further mitigation measures to alleviate the impact. To date, staff ;,as not received any study for review. According to the applicant, the cGnsultants need additional time to complete these two studies and therefore is requesting a continuation. II. RECOMMENDAT104: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue this item to its August 13, 2986 regular meeting to allow the applicant time to complete and submit the two studies for staff and Commission review. Re tfully to B Bull r City Planner B8 :NF:ko ITEM F 1 y ' `CYTY OF RANC130 CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 23; 11 36 TO Planning Commission FROM: Blane W. Frandsen, Senior Civi'.i Engineer U 'I jr6 a F O Z i3� > SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 9986 - CITY OF 19-77 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To provide right -of -way for the widening of Hermosa Avenue between Mignoette and 19th Street and the extension of Hamilton Street from Deer Canyon School to Hermosa - APN 202- 201 -08, 30, 69 and 71. Please find attached an application and copies of Tentative Parcel Map 9986 being prepared by the City in an effert to provide Right-of-Way for the widening of Hermosa Avenue between Mignoii; to and 19th Street and the extension of Hamilton Street from Deer Canyon School to Hermosa Street,. The Parcel Map is being prepared to establish the ultimate right -of -way limits for Hermosa Avenue and for the creating of a new street right -of- way for Hamilton Street from the Deer Canyon School to Hermosa Avenue. It is noted that no new parcels are created by virtue of the map. The three parties signing the Map include the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the Al 'a Loma School District and Fred & Jane Koning, a private party owning A.P. No. 202- 201 -08. The City, School District and the Konings by virtue of the Map will set aside re ,-1 property for use in a public right of way and roadway. The City also quitclaims to Mr. & Mrs. Koning excess right of way along Hermosa Avenue for and in exchange for roadway right -of -way along Hamilton and 19th Streets. roadway improvements for all street shown are being constructed by City contract without private involvement except for right -of -way dedications as shown. The overall workings will be constructed in conjw,nction with the construction of Hermosa. Park which has been processed for environmental approval separate and previous to this submittal. Plans and specifications are ready now for the street improvements to proceed pending right -of -way acquisition and construction bidding. Respectfully Submi ed, Blane W. Frandsen Senior Civil Engineer A-*tachments IT91 G •Y � l'i �a Nit'- m c n� a g� BC � n � Z tt,, 2 ^W�'3� vQ. �'�y�•i � a y � a no ^yi Na &3nS at u $ `o 1� a i w pp r a Ll CA 1. Soils and Gealoev. Will the proposal have signisica,t results in: a. Unstable, ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? b. L'' Motions, displacements, compaction c h' of the soil? C, 'Cl,. topography or ground surface coatc„m utervals? d. The destruction, cover =.ng or modification Of any unique geologic or physical features? e• Any potential increase in wind or water erosion et soils, affecting either on or off site conditons? f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? g. Exposer.. of Cdople or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud - slides, ground failure, or similar Fazards? h. An increase in the rate of extraction and /or use of any mineral resource? 2. EYdrolazy. Will the proposal have t:irnificant results in: C— YES MAYBE NO X i G . X CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PART II - INITIAL STUDY -- _ _ X . ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DATE: June 30, 1986 i.. APPLICA1T: City of Rancho Cucamcnga FILING DATE: 06 -30 -86 LOG NUHBER: r PROJECT: Hermosa Avenue Widening /Hamilton Extension PROJECT LOCATION: kzrmosa wtween 19th and Victoria Hamilton bt'tween Hermosa and Ca mina I. r1 VIRO`'aENTAL IMPACTS v'- (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" a sheets), y nswers are required on attached 1. Soils and Gealoev. Will the proposal have signisica,t results in: a. Unstable, ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? b. L'' Motions, displacements, compaction c h' of the soil? C, 'Cl,. topography or ground surface coatc„m utervals? d. The destruction, cover =.ng or modification Of any unique geologic or physical features? e• Any potential increase in wind or water erosion et soils, affecting either on or off site conditons? f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? g. Exposer.. of Cdople or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud - slides, ground failure, or similar Fazards? h. An increase in the rate of extraction and /or use of any mineral resource? 2. EYdrolazy. Will the proposal have t:irnificant results in: C— YES MAYBE NO X X` X X -- _ _ X 7 Page YES =4Y3= * p a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of flowing strezmp , rivers, or ephemeral stream channels? X b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or thz � r rate aid of surface water runoff? X c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X ChangY in the amount of surface dater to any body of water? X e. Discharge into surface waters, or any alreratiou of surface water quality? x f, Alterarion of groundwater characteristics? X g. Change in the quazx'3sy of groundwaters, either through direct additions or with - drawals, nr through interferencee with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? X h. The reduction in the amount of stater other- wise available for public water supplies? n I- Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or seiches? X 3. AA r_ Q_ u_ a tY. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Constant or periodic air emissions from 3ooile or indirect sources? ' Stationary sources? X ---- X b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or j.sterference with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? X c. Alteration of 'vocal or regional climatic �. conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? &. Biota Flora. Will the proposal have significant results a, Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distj.*.bution, or number of any species of plants? X b. Reduction of the numters of any.unique, rare or endangered species of ps is? t ..... X c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of plant, into an area? d. Redaction in the potential for agricultural production? Fauna. Will. the proposai,'have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or numbers Of any species of animals? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new r-,e disruptive species of animals into as aria, or result in a barrier to the Migration or movement of animals? d. Aet2xirrarion removal of existing fish or wildlife habitat': 5. Ponulr,cion. Wi2l the proposal have significant :exalts in: a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of the human population of an area? b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for addxtional housing? 6. Socio- Economic Factors. Will ti,I proposal have 1- gnifi.cant results in: a. Change in local or regional socio- economic characteristics, including economic or commercial diversity, tax rate, and property values^ b. W!ll project costs be equitably distributed among project beneficiar ;,es, i.e., buyers, tax payers or project users? 7. Land Use and Planning Considerations. Will the proposal have significant results in? a. A substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, Policies, or adopted plans of any governmental entities? C- An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of existing consumptive or non - consumptive recreational opportunities? ry ?age 3 a� Page 4 w r YES k?AY3E N t ; $• Tr4'snortation. Will the proposal have significant results, G a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? 1 X b• Effects on existing Streets, er demand for new street constr*Actron? X c- Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X d. Substantial impact upon existing transporta- tion systems? e. Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of people and /or goods? X X £. Alterations to or effects on present and Potential water- borne, rail, mass transit or air traffic? X g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? I X 9. Cultural Resources. Will' the proposal have significant results in: a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, paleontological, and /or historical resoureas? X X 10. Health. Safety and Nuisance Factors. Will the proposal have significant rc;ntlts in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? X b. Exposure 0—people to potential health hazards? X+ c, A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances in the --vent of an accident? X d. An :rcrease in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? X e. Increase in existing noise levels? X f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous noise levels? .� X g. The creation, of -objectionable -, ors? X h. An increase in light or glare? X j Page YES ri 11. Aesthetics. Will the P70posa! have significant. results in: a. The obstruction or degradation, Of any scenic vista or view? X b. ne creation of an aesthetically sthetically olfe;siv site? X A conflict with the objective of designated or potential scenic corridors? d. Complete X o missinfl islands of street improv.i-rents 12. Utilities and Publ,'Lc Services. Will the proposal �for hove a significant:—need new systems, or alterations to the following: a. Electric power? X b. Natural or packaged gal? X c- Communications systems? X d. Wat4r supply? X e- Wastewater facilities? X f. Flood control structures? X 9. Solid waste facilities? X h. Fire protection? X i- Police protection? X J. Schools? X k. Parks or other recreational facilities? X I. Maintenance of Public facilities, including roads and flood control facilities? X m. Other governmental services? X 13. EnzruZ_--jnd Scarce Resources. 'Jill the proposal —results have s:.E-ifica.. in: a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? X b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy? X C. An increase in the demand for development of new sources of energy? X d. A= increase or perpetuation of the consumption of non—renewable forms of energy, when feasible renewable sources of energy are available? X --7 dY /' - 7P..6 ,j YEa, `AY9.E NO t, e- Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or scarce natural resource? X 14. Mand >ory Ftndin�s of 5tt-�ificance. a. Does the project have the the quality of the environment,tsubstanaiallye reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife Population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number -or restrict the range of a rare, or endangered plant or animal or eliminate - Important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X _ b. Does the Pfoject have the potential to ", ichieva short —term, to the disadvantage of long'j�term, envirpnmilutal goals? (A short —term impact on the environmPFtt is one which occurs in a relatively brief, deL.:: $tiye period ,of time while long,- term impacts will endure Pall into the future). X C. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects past of projects, and probable future projects). Y d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly indirectly? or X _ II. DISCUSSION Of EM IRONMENTAL VALUATION (i.e., of affirmative the above answers -to questions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures),, Page 7 � �a On the basis, initial evaluation. $,. I find the proposed project CO= NOT have a signi,,`.cant effect - on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DEC?!LRAp:u N w%il be prepared. II find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect �� zw in this case because the mitigation measures described on a t attached sheet have been added to the n ;^ DECLARATION ^WILL BE P "REPARED, project. A NEGATIVE I find the proposed project XAY have a significant effect on the envirnment, and an ENVIRONxMEy. L`IPACT REPORT is required. Date R� ._ass t: SigRatur2 Titl- e I �i 1b, -c During the course of the street widening materials from both embankments along Hermosa Avenue will be excavated. Enibankment heights will run from 2 to 5 feet in height and will be ,;,etained with new river rock faced retaining walls located at the back of each new sidewalk. On the East side of the street the wall height Will be appe'oximately 24 ". The embankment- will then slope back at a 5 to 1 slope to the daylight line. Through the limit of the park site these slopes will be landscaped. Elsewhere no landscaping is proposed. Along the west side of the street the x;all heights will vary to catch the grade of the natural slope at the proposed right of way line. An estimated 6 to 8 thousand cubic yi�,ds of material will be removed from the roadway embankments. These matc=iall will be deposited onto the adjoining park site as fill material use in the park development. 2b., -c Hermosa AVenue has traditionally carried most all of the runoff from the Alta Loma Creek drainage system. A high flood wall has lined either side of the street where the street acted as the storm channel ^. Nn this instance the storm channel has been paved to act as the street. The project will remove the existing flood walls, widzn the street, then build retaining wails at the back of each sidewalk, The new retaining walls will serve as flood walls until storm drains can be constructed at a later date under separate project. The flood depths previous experienced will be allowed to spread over an additional feet of street reducing the 100 year flood height by more than half. 2i In the past sidewalks were minimal along the subject reach of Hermosa. Those daring to walk along the street had to walk in the street in the floodway. Residents will now be able to walk along the street and floodway. Ultimate or 100 year design runoff will over top the curb height and wash accross the sidewalks. A dry walkway will exist during the usual storm occurance. Rainstorms exceeding a 25 year occurance will remain a hazard until storm drains can be installed to remove the flood waters from the street. 5b Street frontage improvements will be added at 4 existing residencRs. Trees fronting such will be removed the embankments cut back and curbs, gutters, retaining walls and safety railings installed where none f/isted previously. 7c T' .is project is being constructed in conjunction with the development of the new Hermosa Avenue Park adjacent to the Deer Canyon School. A significant increase in recreational opportunity will be provided by virtue of this new Community park. G -10 =i 8b -c-e The midenin�q of Hermosa between Victoria and 14th has required minimal widenings of''Victoria west of Hermosa, Hermosa north of 19th and 19th Street East of Hermosa, all of which will be performed as part of the construction. The traffic markings on 19th Street and on Hermosa Street will also be removed and replaced as part of the project,. 8c Thru traffic on Hamilton recommends the widening of the North side of the existing section of Hamilton Street. The additional widening has been included at the request of the City Council and Schoolpistrict. Right of Way acquisitianwould remain the only drawback. Be Hermosa is presently masterplanned for widening, being designated as a secondardary arterial street. The extension of Hamilt�lp thru to 'Hermosa Avenue will allow for thru traffic to proceed alon4?Ramilton from Hermosa to Cartilla. Traffic is now from Cartilla to 'tPh school and return.: Now traffic to and fromthe school from we6$'nf Hermosa will be able to drive direct to the facility using Hert,,.osa and Hamilton relieving some of the traffic on 19th and Cartilla. The new park site will traffic using Cartilla and Hamilton. The neighborhood park is .mall those which would be inconvenienced the most are also to be considered the primary users of the facility. The park facility will provide additional parking adjacent to the school site and on street ;narking on Hamilton which should relieve some of -+ the parking congestion around the school currently experienced during evening assemblies and parent - teacher nights as well as weekend sports activities at the school and new park site. 9a Concern over the less of'the old rock flood walls along Hermosa has been expressed by the Historical Commission. The rock flood walls are of "turn of the century" origin, construction and appearance. To retain the historical theme those walls facing Hermosa will be built with a native river rock vineer or stone facing similar in appearance to those recently built at Hermosa and Base Line and in keeping with the historical past of the community. Wall heights will be reduced where possible to allow for street side landscaping along the East side of the street. West side walls will be higher where narrow rights of v. -_­ ,ould restrict the sloping of the road side embankments. 10 a -g Hermosa is being widened according to its masterplan. This facilitates additional traffic along with its accompanying noise and objectionable exhause fumes. these are unavoidable but in line with the planned development of this street. 11 d Much of the street widening proposed will add or fill in unimproved reaches of missing curbs, gutters and sidewalks. The appearance of the old flood walls is also deteriorated and in disrepair. A general upgrade in the overall appearance should be realized. •art:: 14 K ,.. _ - ... \ 1 '.?" }� • M M1 2 12 a &c The most severe impact of this project will be to the overhead poNer '1 and telecommunioation facilities which will have .to be relocated by virtue of the street widenings. It is currently being proposed to underground theseiaf`acilities as part of the project, The PU.,Aic Utility Commiss,an ,Rule 2D wilt be exercised performing these •in workings. In this instance the City will have to augment the Rule 20 funds to comp7°ete such workings. A project budget item for these: undergroundin °gs w`a-s accepted in the 1.986 -67 fiscal budget for the City proposing the replacement of the overhead lines with new underground ti ducting and conductors. 12 M Flood control storm drains are pijnned for the future for this street To reduce future expensel of street cut the center lanes curret:cly in need of reconstructlnn will be left for future dig, ;p and replac6ieutr, A thin asphalt conci,gte cap will be placed over-- here pavements for appearance which to 36' a part will be lost in ;-A timate storm drain iw�tall;ation and reconstruction of the street. Nuisance waters currently r�6ning in the streets will be carried in and along the -new ',Ftandard curbs and gutters which will` reduce water flouting on the strilet as well as retarding the pavement spatting and ravelling currently caused by the constant flow of water over the street pavements. 12 j &k The narrow half street currently strving Deer Canyon School will be E, widened to full width to allDw for addition of street parking across from the G, school as well as allowing for circulation direct from Hermosa Avenue. Circulation to and from the school should be significantly improved. The school and park facilities are proposing to share parking facilities which should benefit both agencies relieving each others peak usages. i � -la- RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL 14AP NUMBER 9986 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 9986, submitted by the Community Development Department, Engineering Division, for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, applicant, for the purpose of establishing roadway right -of *way for the widening of Hermosa Avenue from south of Mignonette to 19th Street and the extending of Hamilton Street from the Deer Canyon School to Hermosa Avenue, such streets situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California. Those existing parcels identified by Accessor's Parcel Numbers 202 - 201 -08, 202- 201 -71, 202 - 201 -30, and 202- 201 -69 located at 6729 Hermosa Avenue and the Hermosa Park site of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Deer Canyon School are included in the Parcel Map and propose to dedicate roadway right -of -way by virtue of the Final Map filing. FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVES AS SECTION 1. I. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the proposed improvements of Hermosa and Hamilton Streets are consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed improvements. 4. That the improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems, or have adverse affects on abutting properties and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2. Tentative.- Parcel Map Number 9987 is hereby approved and -a Negative e6 c[aration issued. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF JULY, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chai rman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Depucy Secretary -I3 F, ANNINC+ COMMISSIo% RESOLD o M O'; PAFCEL MAP 9986 986 23, 1 duly _. Page 2 Commission of the City of Secretary of the Planning Deputy tifV that the foregoing Resol uomr;ssionuof the and I7 grad Buller, do hereby cerand' adopted by the Planning Commission held Rancho Cucintroduced, Passed, of the Planning regularly at a regular meeting Vote -to wits City of Rancho CofaJ 3Ya'1986, by the following on the 23rd day AYES; COMMISSIONERSS NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS; K DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITX OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ��3cnhr { t � 4 . o a July 23, 1986 7 Planning Gamnission 197 Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer Joe Stofa Jr., Associate Civil Engineer ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 10008 - HAVEN TECH. CENTER ivisian or 5 acr-e-s-6.1 121.11a into parse s n Tie Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) 1'cated on the west side of Utica Avenue approximately 500 feet north of Jersey Boulevard •• APN 209- 142 -18, 25, 29. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested; To approve the Parcel Map. B. Purpose: To divide 3.265 acres of land into 3 parcels. C. LMatiom West side of Utica Avenue, approximately 500 feet north 57-, ersey Boulevard. D. Parcel Size: Par"al 1 - 1.142 acres Parcel 2 - 1.117 acres Parcel 3 - 1.006 acres, E. Existing Zoning: Subarea 6 of the Indrstrial Specific Plan; n us r a ard-.' F. Existing Land Use: Vacant, under constPuction (grading). G. Surrounding Land Use: North --Vic-ant. South - Vacant. East - Vacant. West - Vacant. H. Surrounding General Plan and Developmeit Code Designations: ortn n us rMa ar ; u area 6. South - Industrial Park; Subarea 6. East - Minimum Impact, Heavy Industrial; Siberea 9. West - Industrial Perk; Subarea 6. ITEM �r PLANNrfI COt�4ISS16t S �ROR{lk , " i. PARCEL MAP 10908 H' ', . N TECH L�ENTER July 23, 1986 i Page 2 s "y I. Site Characteristics: The site is currently under construction. i p II. ANALYSIS: The purpose of the Parcel. Map is to create separate parcels ` f or eac of the separate buildings previously apprr,ved as Development ` Reviey 85 -26 trd er' o Exhibit "C"). The Tentative Parcel Map its-elf is shown on Exhibit "8 The parcels will gain. access through shared drive aisles (shaded on the Parcel ;lap). There are no existing ovf!,head utill,`,Jes -fronting the site. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW, Also attached for your review and co^5l &iravion is War—E-1- WrI il Rt � a7 Study as completed by the applicant. '­_, . Staff has . completed Part II of the Initial Study, the eR,Yfronmental checklist, and has conducted a field: investigation. Upon Completion and review of the Initial Study and field investigation, Stiff found no adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the proposed subdivision. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices•'of Public. Hearing have been sent to surrounding propen„y owners and placed in the Daily, Report Newspaper. Posting at the site hat also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all inpuf IFET elements -of Tentative Parcel ;Map 10008. If after such � consideration, the Commission can recommend approval, then the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative :;eclaration would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, 4�Sko Attachments: Vicinity Map Tentative Map Resolution Recommended Conditions of Approval Initial Study 0 r, CITY OF . RANCHO CUCAIVIO NGA NGINE UNG DIV -MON e G rjW. PAPCEL MA. 10008 TITLE- VICINITY MAP EXmlT 1� .� j P py�+ T/^E�NTATIVppE��ry^ SHEET i OF t { COUNTY pF AN BERNARD NOCSTATE�OF CALIFORNIA ?. RIRO A otrl2lou OF PARCEL 1. MIRO)L YAP F)O; AS 114 Fill ACCORORO t r `IR ROOR lo- of FARCE, r412.. \.{O!I 12 a ...... OERBtSN. OUERRA A ASSOC. MARCH )9Lt � 1 --- �•mwtrter , � Y04Ltr couwwe. y Fail FRh qr.!•ktiiRPF n red w t lhb'i)P.A r wu ie \ \�7rai arc ' tfi►T7?'7i .�( Af�S'PBiiL'1V1B2R� �RPJS12v�(.ytl:in °°+ •VICINITY gip`. ii �Y �i:�'N'.°'ti "a °�,re�kw. 9►I��11. {yl�`-r" `.} ' �� €' Ckii 7@D IIIJR.ip. 1kFA 4 tlN 1.117 ili • uu cut PiPei R ill t} t W it3wlP tiro Ski tPPt UPPe t Ptsola6 M ritPa i e M6 tlrM i .Pet PK. ttt Fit\ 1h7 PeF )ly ftPt t iK 11.Y 172 > -Y,P )0 f lat \r! \ 111E PPli- liar fh tat M L uecKil�+ lt, It.. Ul Fat wPt at PPIgtP h i,[. 1 Ll 1� tub W I Iut. utt Pt Ntuu )at. eK 1 tat P � W i_—�,- _.ARROW _ �Oiil1 g 1 f... PORTION pgACEL 2 11 IIi PM 1993 pM6 12,I P2 r h!1 MA. Zeal .. 'ail ��•.... •1 "'it�� ...ti• • 1•pFO` PARCEL 2., I PARCE 1006 A 11IT AC.,f I• • �rM ..tAe.� vs�i V a 1A. fwew.v � ii'i = —riur :✓ew.w : I 3 ! RR . 1 t J 459q pMB .ITS r -3 ar e,l I o � [tOULEVARO — xifi13i7 -- 13 � �cr NORTH CITY OF ITENI: RANCHO CUCAIVIONLGA ` CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PART Ii - INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DATE: JULY t.%A APPLICANT:- - bb'LCati rage C FILING DAM.- &ay l r M94, LOG NU.SBEfi PROJECT. - &eCg :L rtfp-p /t3/ID6T PROJECT LOCATION:. six . a,t 1)f /t¢) •l .jc —��•' ��+�� �iGTf,G7.EFiV ��!lJ J� /},ttl �,1.�''S,�1G�C` I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all "Yes"' and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets). YES MAYBE NO 7 L Soils and GeoloR . Twill the proposal have significant results int a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic relatio;•ships? b. Disruptions,- displacements, compaction or burial of the soil? c/ c. Change in topography or ground surface contour intervals? d. The destructi,on,'coveing or modification of any uniquEt geologic or physical features? e. Any potential increase in wind or water erosion of soils, affecting either on or off site conditons? er f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? ✓� g. Exposure Of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? !/ h. An increase in the rate of extraction and /or use of any raineral resource? 2. A)drology. Will the proposal have significant' results in; P v(P 14-1 P" YES VMBE a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream channels? v b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage pattern,,,: or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? v/ c. Alterations to the course or flow o` Flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any body of water? e. Discharge into surface waters, or any alteration of surface *pater quality? f, Alteration of groundwater characteristics? — t/ g. Change in the quantity.of groundwaters, h either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interference with an aquifer? Quality. ;z O"antity? r i (h_ h. The reduction in the amount of water other - fir. wise available for public .• ter supplies? t/ L. Exposure of people or property to water )( related hazards such as flooding or seiches? 3. Air Quality. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile or indirect sources? Stationary sources? �. b. Deterioration of ambi.snt air quality and /or interference with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? �r c. Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, mo:_sture or temperature? t 4. Biota — — Flora. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or number of any species of plants? y/ b. Reduction of.the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? 14-1 YES c. Introduction of nea or disruptive species of plants into an area? - d. Reduction iit the potential for agricultural production? Fauna. Will the prroposal have significant results - �, in; a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, , distribution, or numbers of any species of animals? i. b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare f or endangered species of animals? Z/ c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? v d. Detezioration or removal of existing fish or wildlife habitat? - S. Population. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of Ash the human population of an area? b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? r i/ 6. Soeio- Economic Factors. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in local or regional socio- economic characteristics,-including economic or commercial diversity, tax rate, and property values? b. Will project costs be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax payers or project users? t /' 7. Land Use and Plannir Considerations. Will the proposal have significant results in? a. A substantial alteration of the present or .planned land use of an area? b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, po'.icies, or adopted plans of any governmental entities? c. An impact upon the qulalty -or quantity of existing consumptive or non - consumptive recreational opportunities? �- f _S _.FSE �• 7 8. Transportation. Will the proposal have significant resul ^s iw a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? v meat. b. -. Effects on existing streets, or demand for new street construkion? 4 {: " c. Effects on eXistigg parking facilities, or demand for new parking? d. Substantial impact upon existing transporta- tion systems? ✓ e. Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of people and /or goods? f. Alterations to or effects on present and potential water- borne, rai', mass transit or air traffic? i. 1, v ;. g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians ?' 9. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, paleontological, and /or historical resources: t/ 10. Health. Safety, and Nuisance Factors. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? ra b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards" v c. A rivk of explosion or release of hazardous substances in the event of an accident? d. An increase in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? e. Increase in existing noise levels? f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous noise levels? g. The creation of objectionable odors? tt, An increase in light or glare? �- f . .. 7 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant results in; x a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic vista or view? ✓ b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive "Ate? " c. A conflict with the objective of designated or potential scenic corridors? 12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal have a significant need for ne;o, sy .ems, or alterations to the followings a. Electric power? L� ` b. Natural or packaged gas? c. Communications systems? d. Water s6pply? t� e. Wastewater facilities? J' f. Flood control structures? g. Solid waste facilities? V° h. Firs: protection? i. Police protection? tJ J. Schcols? k. Parks or other recreational facilities? t/ I. Maintenance of public facili'�les, including roads and flood control facilities? i a/ m. Other governmental services? v I 13. Energy and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal ! j have significant results in: a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? ✓` b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy? v c. An increase it, the demand for development of new sources of energy? _ d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumption of non - renewable forms of energy, when feasible , renewable sources of energy are available? ✓, 14-10 M-%tiBE ::0 e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or scarce natural resource" 14. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the ualit• of - 4 A q y e environment, substantially reduce the habitat of 'r sh or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife pgaulation to drop below self sustaining levels,_threater. to elimin-ate c plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or annual or eliminate important examples of the major periods of C..lifornia history or prehistory? _✓ b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long- term,, environmental goals? (A short -term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long- term impacts will endure well into the future). V c. Unes the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (Cumulati7ely considerable means that the incremental affects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of pact projects, and probable future projects). ✓ j d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? ✓ II. DISCUSSION OF EX,71RONMENTAL EVALUATION (i.e., of affirmative answers to_ the above questions plus a discussion of propor d mitigation measures).' P-1) 7m' ZII, DE^ RXI!;,t_ ?IO,% l On the basis o`f td1is initial evaluation; . I I find t'fgq,,proposed project COULD SOT have a significant effect on the environmenit, and a t.EGATICE DECLdR:1TIOY will be prepare& I find that although the, proposed project could have a significant effect on he environment, there will not be a significant effect in this care oecause the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED: .a I find the proposed project 'MAY have a significant effect on the envirnnent, a Ad an EMR�'-NHUT,,LiPACT REPORT is required, Date 5ignat e k „ Title a RESOLUTION NO'. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 10008 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 10008,, submitted by Haven Tech Center, applicant, for the purpose of nubdivioinq into three parcels, the real property sit�iated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County, of San Bernardino, State of California, identified as APN(s) 209- 142 -18, 25, 4, located south of Arrow Route between Haven Avenue and Utica Avenue; and WHEREAS, on July 23, 1986, the Planning Zommission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above- described map. FOLLOWS: NOW,. T"ZAEFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS z SECTION 1 That the following findings have been made: 1. That '0q map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. F 3. That the site is_ohysically suitable for the proposed development. 4. T.iat the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on:- abutting property and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2; Tentative parcel Map Number 10008 is hereby approved sou aecl -f-o the attached Standard Conditions and the following Special Conditions; 1. All pertinent conditions of Parcel Map 9301 shall apply. 2. Building parmits shall be issued for all buildings within the Parcel Map prior to recordatioa of the Final Map. 3. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided as shown on the tentative man. The area within the easement shall be improved prior to occupancy release for any of the buildings. 1� `J PLANNING. COkalssi N NO. PARCEL MAP IOODB - HAVEN TECH CENTER ,,uly 23, 1986 Page 2 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF J PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE-CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Veffn—is-T--,stout, Chaipmri-4 ATTEST. Brad Buller- eputy Secretary- 1, Brad Buller, peputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of thei City'of Rancho Cucamonga; 'do hereby;,certify- that the foregoing Resolution was di�jy�.ind regularly introduced, passed, and adapted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held or, the 23rd day of July, 1986, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: 'COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: flYl-, 01 u ,a1. �p E E c U V O LT d G� V� c4 a 5 °d Y O J dCC E �•t u' T q � 4 O v r N ~ .a...^. acs mw y y � M O Era R A ! C 8G0 y L U •" L� .. O U ^ S it mi d L sir Q. y .Yt y CyC 4� Ni u N d ' C fawy 4 N Up• ..C. N� wZ� x= v v,y r y p i L O O p > 4 L p V,p. (14 ayai i Y NY i,a Ct af^ L� N Uuu N 0 ^ 66 y ^ a ` y gnpg .. FN. t A L N '4 N •„ u u.°eo YO.r UO S.y.O 6 =N y�LC u�` �r 4MZ OC 4. mod.. OwWa CC&`LC ^�N. 1 L^IT O,Y ld �? yq . Lppd Myg C C y -'Cd 6 'W H 6\.4.0 �iw43 eCi U dad -2 *j U� C y c; H XI YS 1 C ^ L .+ y y � M O Era U ! C y L U •" L� .. O U ^ 4c GE dcaw it mi d L sir Q. y .Yt y CyC 4� Ni uec sciC ' C fawy 4 N Up• ..C. N� s N x= v v y p i L O O p L N N A u ^O�CO L y B S� y d.rr u° U }C Uuu N 0 ^ v et S N� �pdu O� Oti .. FN. t A L N '4 N •„ u u.°eo YO.r UO " is C Y M •ec L .+ y � Era s^ L U •" ^ 4c GE dcaw m y `n sir Q. y .Yt � CyC 4� Ni uec sciC ' C fawy Up• ..C. N� C,p u x= yy ^O�CO L y B S� y d.rr g2 ^ v N L N '4 N •„ u u.°eo YO.r UO 4S C� FJa U TUr .- UO ��auys Y 4 �y 04 . Y c Yw d W O W p aM1. u Ay a L �• O c� N dD• qU �v Er Nd LY Ll..l N Y Y L C ° °9 Sp t av ue Tom' y O N Yq �`° i N Y ^• N P� y X< < ,ew U ry a cd E O N J 6 ..�. S V i a�61 c i as u TLd MOt Tf CV W. N ` T iY v w u 'a YjYy¢ ON aE Eµ c� •M v. a W cgati a °r N C WO �A j J �N Y 6'lp L L N 1 C • T4N O LL d 9 U Y N n q q 4 Y Y LG LQ Yv° oY° dyT...r LOLL°. LAN N Y �O�N OL L 4. OyY C a T NC°lL �Cj 6Y7 p T.GL N b Iw Y c Yw d W O W p aM1. u Ay a L �• O c� N dD• qU �v Er Nd LY Ll..l N Y Y L C ° °9 Sp t av ue Tom' y O N Yq �`° i N Y ^• N P� y X< < Ya Y oe^ Q N y Y y � gum w E r To�S gia t`Y LtF C O- L� On O _ j 4 M A a ONO uc° M l .¢ T N vYi a Y v._ V L L Y N `G Y V L q Y Y Y O a QN V Y Y y C O a Y O L a t T � • V d M T1 • v Y'A.a A Yr Y p 214'. y7 4.mn KAO 6fu d H N L E -2 El 1- -1. ,ew Y p (l y 3 QQ iY v u WW YjYy¢ ON aE Eµ c� O.V v. a cgati a °r N C WO �A j J �N Y 6'lp L L N 1 C • T4N O LL d 9 U Y N n q q 4 Y Y LG YN+ LOLL°. �Y Yu T YR.4N. aL°.L 4 X u G N a •`aa i O T Ya Y oe^ Q N y Y y � gum w E r To�S gia t`Y LtF C O- L� On O _ j 4 M A a ONO uc° M l .¢ T N vYi a Y v._ V L L Y N `G Y V L q Y Y Y O a QN V Y Y y C O a Y O L a t T � • V d M T1 • v Y'A.a A Yr Y p 214'. y7 4.mn KAO 6fu d H N L E -2 El 1- -1. L7 ju DATE: TO; FROM: BY: SUBJECT: 'CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT July 23, 1986 Planning Commission Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer Joe Stofa, Associate Civil Engineer G�cat�to�L v v > ................. .+ +'+u.+ uw 'nRl•GL. 1'171' 7Tiq - w1LLIMI LTUM LUMPAW - A ion. Of 8:78 a�f land into 2 parcels in the Victoria Planned Community located at the northwest ;,orner of Base Line Road and Victoria Park Lane - APN 227 - 111 -12, 132 28, 34, & 35). I. PROJECT AMD SITE DESCRIPTION A. Action Requested: Approval of Parcel Map. B. Purpose: To divide 18.78 acres into 2 parcels. C. Location: Northwest corner of Base Line Road ant. Victoria Park Lane. D. ParclA Size: Parcel 1 - 7.92 acres. Parcel 2 - 10.25 acres. E. Existing Zoning: Parcel 1 - Residential (Mil). Parcel 2 - Villp+ge Commercial. F. Existing Land Use: Vacant. - G. Surrounding Land Use: North Resi en3 tiai, South - Vacant East - Residential (under constr'�ction). West - Vacant. H. Surrounding General Plan and Development Code Designations: North - Residential. ial. South - Residential. East - Residential. (West - Residential. I. Site Char cteristics This site is vacant and slopes approximately 2% to the southeast. ITEM I PLANNi4C COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PARCEL MAP 9946,.- WILLIAM LYON COMPANY July 23, 1986: Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: The purpose of this Parcae Map is to create two,parcels for future evelopment, one for Residential and one for Village Commercial in the Victoria Planned Community. The proposed Parceil Map will alsff dedicate the additional right -of -way needed for Base Line Road. z1n1provements will be cotistructed upon development of Parcel 2. Cverhead utilities exist on a portion of the project side of Base Line RoaC frontage and a portion of the opposite side of Base Line Road fron,Moe. Staff recommends that the lines on the project side of Base Line` Road be undergrounded 'at the time of development of, Parcel 2 and that a fee in -lieu be paid for the opposite side o{ Base Line Road prior to issuance of building permits for Parcel 2. III. ENVIRGNMENTAL REVIEW: Also attached for your review and consideraticn is War—F-1—o War—F-1—oT t a Initial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has j completed Part II of the Initial 5`.udy, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Upon completion . and review of the Initial Study and field investigation, Staff found no adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the proposed subdivision. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning;; Commission consider all input anI elements of Tentative Parcel Map 9946. If after such consideration, the Commission can recommend approval, then the adoption of the attached resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, ! AOOZ,, BRN:dS:ko Attachments: Vicinity Map Tentative Map Resolution Recommended Conditions of Aprroval Initial Study i L4 THE WINDROWS , UA �. C' � VVfN4yi4W9 tt• i % �' `� w M ^stew[ Ac,a x PROJECT SITE CITE" OF RANCHO CU A rT .L GA ENGI - -.aL' WG DIMION r V' I A y M. PARCEL MAP 9946 Tffu, VICINITY MAP rt A It 9 +,: ttd '� pit, �2 Z � 1� q ? '�'S�'" in w I1t. tit Hi ` t�,r p- kp7yf42 tis$Fs� LV....r�^-• g Z. t�e3. i �3� � �atxaasaysy�� ; r T!y 4 �--• e 1NN ! n• n LT y ;es CL e a tINV3Vn1 HN1 J y W Q U Od LU ACC e e a, '4 9 CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA PARt II INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DATE: �Li✓i1� u�_ IRS ,e& APPLICANT: LWU --gel 4.YdAl Co FILING DATE: _fp}f'Q_L ,��j�, LOG NUMBER PROJECT: PO MAP PROJECT LOCATION: [' W. C. L F^An Ad JA 1//GTD l LSE I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets). 1. Soils and Geology. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? b. Disruptions,, displacements, compaction or burial of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface contour intervals? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any potential increase in wind or water erosion of soils, affecting either on or off site conditons? f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? g. Expasure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslid. ?.s, mud - slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? h. An increase in the rate of extraction and /or use of any mineral resource? Z. Hydr 10 . Will the proposal have significant results in: YES MAYBE NO i �. , F YES MAYBE \0 � a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction Of flowing strPams, rivers, or ephemeral stream canneis? y, b. Chan ;es in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or tLe rate and amount of surface water runof,'? c. Alterations co the course or flow of flood waters$' vl d. Change ? the amount of surface water in any body of', Lter? / e. Discharge into surface waters, or any alteratioit of surface water quality ?,< f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? ?' g. Change in the quantity.of groundwaters, ti either through dizect additions or with- drawals, or through interference with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? e% h. The reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for public water supplies? i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or seiches? 3. Air quality. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile or indirect sources? stationary sources? 4 b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or interference with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? t/ C- Alteration of local or regional climatic Conditions, affecting aid movement, moisture or temperature? 4. Biota t Flora. WJ 11 the proposal have significant results in: a. Change - -:. the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or number ; of any species of plants? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? �� 1 y�. YES _LAXBE NO tl i C/ I I i I c. introduction of new or disr.pY ive species of plants into in area? d. Reduction in t;te potential for agricultural production? Fauna. Will the proposal have significant results in. a. Change in the chara 'laristics of species, p including diversity, distribution, or numbers € of any species of animals? b. Seduction of the numbors of any unique, rare or endangered specicri of animals? c. introduction of new or disrupt ve species of animals into an area, or result is a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or wildlife habitat? 5. Population. Will the proposal have significant E results ins a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, diversity, or groith rate of p' the human population of an area? F< b. bill the proposal affect existing housing, or +. create a demand for additional housing? 6. Socio- Economic Factors. Will the proposal have e significant results in: - a. Change is local or regional socio- economic characteristics, including economic or commercial diversity, tax rate, and property values? b. Will project costs be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax payers or project users? 7. Land Use and Planning Considerations. Will the proposal have significant results in? a. A substantial alteration of the present or .planned land use of an area? b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, policies, of adopted plans of any governmental entities? c. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of existing consumptive or non - consumptive recreational opportunities? y�. YES _LAXBE NO tl i C/ I I i I I i` YES 'L;Y9F. IT a- Transportation. Will the proposal have significant results in.. , a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular i movement? v: b. Effects on existing streets, ;,- demand for new street construction? L/ c., Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? d. Substantial impact Cipvn existing transporta- tion systems? v� e. Alterations tQ present patterns of cixcula- tion or movement of people andlor goods? _. f. Alterations to or effects on present and potential, water -borne, rail, mass'transit or air traffic? f, g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? ^: Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have ~ significant results in: Am a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, paleontological, and/or historical resources? ✓ 10. Health. Safety attd Nuisance Fa'ttors. Will the Proposal have significant results in. a. Creation of any health hazard pr potential health hazard? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances in the event of an accident? � / V d. An increase in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? 1st _. Increase in existing noise levels? ` e_ f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous noise levels? t% S. The creation of objectionable odors? h. An increase in light or glare? a: -7 31. Aesthetics, Will the-proposal have significant kt results in: a. The obstruction or degt..dation of any scenic vista or view? b. The creatio:l of an aesthetically offensive *: site? c. A, conflict with the objective of designated or potential scenic corridors? 12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal ` have a significant need for new systems, or alterations to tre following: a. Electric powt__? F/ x b. Natural or packaged gas? c. Communications systems? d. Water supply? e. Wastewater facilities? f. Flood control structures? g. Solid waste facilities? h. Fire protection? i. Police protection? f j. Schools? f " k. Parks r. other recreational facilities? 1. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads ant flood control facilities? M. Other governmental services? i 13. Ener:;y and ScarceR esources. Wi:l the proposal have significant results in: a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy? c. Aa increase in the demand for development of view sources of energy? d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumption of non - renewable forms of energy, when feasible renewable sources of energy ara available? a: -7 Ply r :4Ic _4:34 NO Substantial depletion of any nonr6_ tecvabir%or scarce natural resource? f lk. Mandatory Find of Significance.t a. DoP.s the project have the'�ent' aZ,'tc degrade 's the quality of the environmeqr -;, substantia'ly : `J U reduce the habitaL of f;sb ov wildlife species, ., cause a fish or wildl fe,/�opulation to drop below self sustaining 14vels, threaten to ` elimiti4te a plant or animal community, reduce t the nutAher or restrict �h, range of a rare or endangered plant or aniial or eliminate `" importantkamples of t;e major periods of California histo ry or p tehiseaty? b. Does the project have ,t�- ,potential to achieve short -term„ to the 'disadvantag�,of Jong -term, environmental goals? (.k short -teem impact on the environment is-one which occurs in a relatively t; brief, definitive period of time while long- term impacts will endure well into the future). c. Does the project have impacts wbich are ti f individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable tteans that the incremental effects of an itdi,zi? »tit project are considerable when viewed 2 in connection with the effects of past projects, and probable future prcjccts). d. Dohs the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adveraA effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? ZI. DISCUSSION of ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATIM, (i.e., of affirmative answers to the above q <,estions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation. measures). : `J U LA DETZ3ON t On the basis of this initial evaluation: r y T find the proposed proiec[»COULD YOT have a significant effect on the environment, art,' a NEGATAV:E, f, DECL?,R:'1TIOY Will be prepared. T find triat although the proposed have a effect on the environment, jnot there will tseuadsignificantneffectt 3n Chis Lase heca1Xse the mitigation a„tached sheet h.11' measures described on an DECL e been added to the project. A NEGACIVE r1RATT4Y WnL':� PREPARED. I find the proposed project *LAY' have a Gignificant effect on the envirnment, and an ENVIR(7j, IT I�SPACT REPORT is required. Date r Signature Title F` RESOLUTION NO. A PESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF i RAK40 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 9946 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number, 9946, submitted by the William. Lyon Company, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into two parcels, the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, identified as APN(s) 227- 111-12, 3'3, 28, 34, & 35, located in the northwest corner of Base Line Road and Victoria Park Lane; and WHEREAS, on July 23, 1986, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above - described map. FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION 1'SOLVED AS SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: I. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement ur the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the ;.reposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affect.. on abutting property and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Parcel Map Number 9946 is hereby approved subject to the attached Standard Conditions and the following Special Conditions: I. Overhead Utilities - Base Line Road a. The existing overhead electric and telecommunication vines along the project side of Base Line Road shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the east side of Victoria Park Lane to the first pole on the south side of Base Line Road prior to occupancy of any buildings on Parcel 2. The developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of one -half the cost of undergrounding from future developments as they occur on the opposite side of the street. _ _ 1_ • PLAN ?lING 03MMISSION RESOLUTION NO PM 9946 - WILLIAM LYON COMPANY July 23, 1986 Page 2 b- A fee in -lieu of undergrounding the existing overhead electric and telecommunication lines on the south side of Base Line Road fronting Parcel 2 shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permits for Parcel 2. The fee shall be one -half the established front foot cost of undergounding. 2. Baseline Road shall be constructed as follows with the '- velopment �3f Parcel 2: a. full improvements for tie north roadbed; b. Full median with only ne opening for Victoria Park Lane; c.. A minimum 18' wine pavement fre the south roadbed; d. Transition pavement, if applicable, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 3, The project (or portions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone, there, ore, floud protection measures shall be provided as certified by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by tie City Engineer. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY N= AULY, 19P5. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO OCAMONGA BY: Oennis L. Stout, C a;rman ATTEST:_ Brad Bullur, Deputy secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission: of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of July, 1986, by the following vote- to -ivit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 11 EI P Z o 4 n 0 w O U gw 3 V x C y c ^ �p E �F N O F i M� =v �E <i^ N rani �`c.Ldc v o A, L a,c bL, S AT E EW A A 4 4 � �•�. n 6 �r W d w; �w r a yb Ey 1 T � b c a � e r LU O dbS. O .CU ..- ^ 1�•L v L N.n � +• m o o �KyN1'jlpi� d c i 0 9 Y Y A c� iw N a� cr. C� nc. i � G• 'ee °o A 4 dL to �� as Ewa A 2�E. v 4 �. �q4' w 4A b4L s VG poi^ NW G� A LT .TA Ey.� 24�i dL4 LA ^40.JL �dy C' RS n b L `�� �Z W d .�T to O� ^ CQ10 A4Y'C LY W 4` 4 <A^ GA = NLI: NW J 4 Jtiy 9 L°1.f ^' 6M csr. d Nit 4p �`N ° °'E d �� y .. •. u ESV . G bA� n.+ nL. iS5�wu 'c:u ` TLy 2n wo c N c a�O yo ^am '� u Evu . 2 6r11 wtJ O w«°+4 69dN A d S S AT E EW A A 4 4 � �•�. 6 �r W w; �w r a Ey 1 T � b c a � H O'3 O a ^ v L N.n � +• m o o �KyN1'jlpi� d c 0 Y d Nit 4p �`N ° °'E d �� y .. •. u ESV . G bA� n.+ nL. iS5�wu 'c:u ` TLy 2n wo c N c a�O yo ^am '� u Evu . 2 6r11 wtJ O w«°+4 69dN A d S S AT E EW A A 4 4 � �•�. I t9I , q L _ r a ° G s o� qu oYE �4t+a. t?v �E c '.0 vain J U, y q Z, ZE Y L y $ U G. o. E15; 9Y wL CR_ r W S t r Lr N G 1`LL a'L4 _ ' ° a XI ' N O Gq •) Y C .y N L ^ E L a a za y ^ Z.S l` y �. Qe .°� �y R UL L b O a ti u a. K uW 6 RO Y y� '�L U� .. N w O E. a. p nF. R.t Y Gay L y,�a p q @C� L6 ° �^ p4 r� NGN q n l y iii 6.` W °6q2 Q �Z Z' r G 7q C° O. 2 Ly :.tLGp GI/) y•'.: w 6 {,+ G oT 94 °':L U•� j l'� �..G. G c� V Cq Ey,. Q O 40U C q Ga p q {i~ A y. a a a a4 U4 I r Nu 4 tl > s, _..° gG v� 6� H - •-D' 4w L E u.mn °Lr <ro'o qtr o. iu �.� a X1 — CITY OF RAI4C O CUCAMONGA CtCAyp ` O L±'` CATE: J4ly 23 19$6 `1977 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior`Civil Engineer BY: Joe Stofs Jr., Associated Civil Enginee.• SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PA?wEL KAP °d2'. - LEWIS HOMES OF CALIFORNIA - To crec.tc 4.36 acres of land -For a r. drk site i�j te Terra Vista Planned Community located at the northwest corner of Spruce Avenue and Elm Avenue. (API 1077- 091 -14) e' I. PROJ CY ".NO SITE DESCRIPTION: A. tion Requested: Approval of Parcel Map B. Purpose: To create a n.36 `cra park site C. Location: North writ corner of Spruce ave and Elm A-enue D. 4rrcel Size: Parcel 1 - 4,36 acres E. Existing Zoning: Planned Comaunity F. E ist_ i_ ng Lan4 Use: Vacant G. surrounding Land Use: North - Vacant_ South - Vacant East - Residential nest - Residential H. Surroundinn en�eeral Plan and Development Code Designations: North - Schorr i 3i to South - Residential East •• Residential West - Residential ITEM J TO: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Parcel Map 9829 July 23, 198E AMW Page 2 I, Site Characteristics: The site is vacant asd slopes approximately 2 tc the southwest. II, ANALYSIS: The purpose of this Parcel Map is to create a 4.36 acre parcel V to be d ,,.veloped as a neighborhood park serving the wL5t side of the Terra Vista Planned Community. The Community Services Divisicn has reviewed the proposed Parcel Map and found the map acceptable per the Terra Vista Planned Community.' The map ~' includes additional dedication along Spruce Avenue and Elm Avenue for the Greenway Trail System. The, site is presently under - jesign for development of the park. There are no overhead utilities fronting this parcel. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Also attached for your review and consideration is ' Part i of the initial Study as completed by the applicant.. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental chockli5- and has conduc`eo a field investigation_ Upor, completion and reviek of the Initial Study and fi41d investigation, Staff found no .a.erse impac�s o. the environment as a result of the proposed subdivision. IV. "I ESPOMDENCE: Notices of Public ,Maaring have been sent ta: surroundin; . property owners and placed in the Daily Report,;-Newspaper. Posting at the site nas also been completed, V. RECOMMENDATIC;1: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider ail input and eleme:tp'of Tentative Parcel Map 9829. If after such consideration, the Co ,,'mission can recommend approval, then the adoption of the attached Resol :,lion and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted. � :d1w 4ttachments: Vicinity Map Tentative Map Resotition Recommended Conditions of Approval Initial Study I p r F7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGMMING DIVISIOW 1 4I -T--3 N A,e JS I ra r�l j 1 rfEM, PARCEL MAP 9829 T,ftU,: VICINITY MAP A {Jyy TA V SHEET I OF 1 SHEET PARCEL MAP ECG. 9329 U4 TUE Ct'ry OF AANCtlo CUCAMONt;Z, CALIFORNIA Cin r f'YtkMx Crew faR.^.aR at F,i I. AS }Parr Ak !RAC- x0 •,• w ttCOR3m •x�xxA1i0s SiR.tGxi= iirisu xik+uctxs. }ia:t a .titroti 1�: ai alk r`ARSG� b)Y k r.otav :isus[1i(�.�ASixkrsaxrns of t aJ •t :r :xc x4'�, r Samm}lax. AS ltx tN? xlga.]Ct tx xaox a ; , S1JgYCt Sin�3��2 5a ;.!t. ,y�'t ainx't7 :lgM[lt or 5�1m. gtta'J.. SWS..RKt f Y ;vt 9f, i:Y Of !xt I LOt MARCH, im 446 ACRES I r smk ow�srue0to rrv.. �vatxn. iisc ml!S r�•1:�• x7tIXL ! ZtkaaiA!Zf. TxC. r, o. Rcu eJkovratM afiw'e ar Fak:'eSRR+Vniro confess aftABf. Ct 11]fi t4 its fCJNJA3x At. k11L rwkc. fttaf tSS -kfll Dat!k 10} mLVO, G 1J06 :xnr,.v t7Ui 1l {rlfff 1. )SkSiM'tPRra -ft.C. Y1,Sa101iMxS t9MIMtiJ % 7• Nw Ott. VAG kxtm -.tR] , '`'�� "• ,• "tt }AM3D mRxA[W — a ws xtft ]xik fARa;L aakTRJYf I ^ knl}Xki PRAatt., SYtZRTk, ttrRxt7E T- sy— {.r. Cr AMA .PDJC�itb S. grtomr SR)1 t>.RtA4 )!ov Jt4gk 7t' If77. t+tturr tor.Axtu /y 1. YA!if /SdtRt ` `� ![xl SAx tYat�btli. lJ�fii -}s!l Ruxxxli fil.a 3Sh'SLY au#roxrtl ili'•b. f�.., 3SSI r. Zp'Dtl,\yyk. xawm, eR. ra37r �litlu4��et�srr7ts (ib 3 s6kt676l rfe•"mh InsvA . rACr AO, Ilfl t. fx1xQZ krikti ..:rttfrsx 1piJ�l�33 x.i�afn � a,xt • RArao tvcAraRat, a, t177e 2 `.- u1f4�S�tlti ktq`f r1R0 rJ. taR i[.t ZrC 0[ xxYkx ppvt. iKt Si.. a) tt. r, Y GVt]1 tr x, w. R a)rx sr., an DRM iIx WC, Z, SAG aR. tat afZ as tat 3-1e- ntv- .ttly, 1J)t.iit is tN• dry M t ff �, J3 �� yy� r x 0: b, �.� {5 Va t ff �, J3 �� yy� r x r s s r : ,., 71 :j. CTX DP RAN CHO Cu'Ct4;tiG3 PART ZI - I:•tITIAL STUDY £DiJIRQN fENTAI CHECKLIST DATE: APPLICANT: �L�GtJt� ;6�ip -C iILTNG DATE: .41� 1 C LdG 14MIEER Pft03£CT:i A�1 �Ct rj r"r3 PROJECT LOCATION: T. !!C IRONIITENTAL IME,ACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets) . I. Soils and G_ e_10O , will Lbo. proposal have significant resu is i.e: a, unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? b. Disruptions,. displacements, compaction 61 burial of t?.e soil? c, Change ir topography or ground surfa.;e contour intervals? d. The destruction, covering or mod:._tcation Of any unique geologic or physical .features? a+ Any potential increase in wind or water erosion of soils, affecting either on or off site tonditons? f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslices, mud- slides, ground failure, or :..milar hazards? h. An increase iri the 'rare of extract;ic,n and /or use of any mineral resource? 2, 2dralogv. Will the proposal here significant results in: XES MAYBE NQ L/ v^ tf ' 'RS V .tFBL a. Changes in currents, or the course of .direction of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream { t' channels; E b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage .patterns, or the ,:ate and amount of surface water 'unoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood 4 waters? ✓ ' d. Change in the amount of surface water in any body of water? e. Discharge into surface w,:ters, or any ' alteration of surface water quality? f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? g. Change in the quantity of groundwaters, ' either through direct additions or with - i= drawals, or through interference with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? h. The reduction in the amount of water other- , wise available for puSlic water supplies? l i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or seiches? 3. Air Quality. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Constant or periodic air emissions rom mobile or indirect sources? „! Stationary sources? b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or interference with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? ✓ e. Alteration of ;Deal or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? i 4. Biota Flora. 1411 the proposal have significant results ins a. Change to. the characteristics of species, Includini, Aiversity, distribution, or number of any species of plants? b. Redvetion of the numbers of any unique, rare or end.^.ngered species of plants? s%' --7 c, Introduction or netr or disruptive species of AOL plants into an area? d. Reduction in the potential fox agricultural production? Fauna. Will the proposal have significant results in: i a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or numbers Of any species of animals? , b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare J or endangered species of animals? �' ✓ 1 c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of animals into zn area,' or result in a barrier to tr;e migxat...on or movement of animals? d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or wil4life habitat? t✓ 5. Population. idill the proposal have significant results in: a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of the human, population of an area? b.. Will the proposal affect:' existing hrusing, or ✓� ` create a demand for addi4onal housing? _� t�. 5—* - Economic Factors, Tdil'� the proposal have significant results in: a. Change iti local or regional socio- economic characteristics, including economic or commercial diversity, tax rate, and property values? y,r' b. Will project costs be eRu tably distributed amon; project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax sayers or project users? 7. Land Use and Planning Considerations. Will the proposal have sign ificant. results in? a A substantial aiteratian of the present ox .planned land use of an area? t,+' b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, Aft policies, or adopted plans of any governmental entities? c. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of ox,isting consumptive or non- consumptives_ recreational opportunities? --7 YES -.YBE No ti. Transportation. Will the proposal have significant results inn: a Generation a. of substantial additional vehicular u,,yement? ✓ � b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for ' new street construction? c. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? d. Substantial impact upon erasting transporta- Lion systems? v/ e. Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion. or mcuetuent of people an=d /or goods? f. Alterations to or effects on present and potential water — borne, rail, mass transit or air traffic? g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyc =lists or pedestrians? 9. Cultural Resour ^.es. Will the pioposal have significant r s xts in: i a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, / paleontological, and/or historical resources? r ✓ 10. Health. Safety and Nuisance Factors. Will the proposal have signi! ticant results t, a. Creation of any health hazard or potential healtiz hazar$3 �r b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? f c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances in the event of an accident? / ✓ d. An increase in the number of individuals Or species Of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? e. Increase in existing noise levels? V/ f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous noise levels? g. The creation of objectionable odors? i ✓` h. An increase in light or glare? o:.. v 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant results in- a. Tha obstrucrion or da;;rLz!z!tion of any bt:enic Vista or view? 'j. The creation oZ an aesthetically of�_�ns:fve site? c. A conflict wIth the c-biective of designated or potential scenic corridors? 12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal 11%av-a a significant need for ne.,q -jttems, or aJ erations to the following: a. Electric ��ower? b. Natural or packaged gas? c. Communications systems? d. Water supply? e. Wastewater facilities? f. Flood control structures? g. Solid waste facilities? h. Fire protection? J. Police protection? Schools? k. Parks or other recreational facilities? 1. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads and ilood control facilities? m. Other go-ernmental services? 13. Energy and Scarcp itesources. W.ill the proposa3 have significant F�_Su_its 2.11 a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? b. Subscantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy? c. A)-, 4�Acrease in the demarA for development of new ources of energy? d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumption of non-renewable forms of energy, when faasible renewable sources of energy are available? YEr CLAYBE Nq e. Substantial depletion of.any nonrenewable or scarce natural resource? r �� 14.,_�fandatory Findings cf;- °3Qnificance. a. Does tpe project have the potential to degrade" the cuality of the environment su stantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, causO, a fish or wildlife population to drop belovr self sustaining levels, threaten 'to ¢. eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce `> the number or restrict the raage of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examplas of the major periods of California Wz toty or prehistory? b. Does -;the project have the potential to achieve short- term, to the disadvantage,-.of long- term, environmental goals? (A short -term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively i brief, defiftitive period of time while long- term impact.i will endure well into the future). 1, c. Does the project have impacts which are tndividually limited, but cumulative ;• ` considerable? (Cumulatively consiaerable means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed t: in connection with the effects of past projects,` and probable future projects). �- d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cruse substantial adverse effects on >zuman teings, either directly or indirectly? II. DISCUSSION OF_OW%IpONMENTAL EVALUATION (i.e., of affirmative answers to the above questions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures ),. III. DET .�SI`,�TIO!i F f On `the basis of this ioitial evaluation: I find thg proposed project._CtiGLII `:OT have a significant ef;:ect J on the environment, and a '.EGATIVE DECLARATIOR will be p +,'pared, LI find that although the proposed projert could have a signifiov,ht effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because .the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet had "f been adde1 to the project. A NECAI`IVE DECLARATION WILL, BE PREPARED. ED('— -y I find the propf,Aed project MY hac•e a significant effect on the envirnnent, �rwd an ENVIRO`"MNT IMPACT REPORT is required. Date Signature P Title 7 y ` RESOLUTION NO. ' P" A .ccSOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THc CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROYINO TENTATIVE t PARCEL MAP 'NUMBER 9829 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map lfmber 988, submitted.,by Lawis Homes, of California, applicant, for the purpose of subdi-uiding into one parcel, the i* real property situated in the City of Rai.cho Cucraw ng o7nunty of San +l Bernardino, State of California, identified as APN {s} lOT7- 091 -14, looateo �. ncrth west corner of Spruce and Elm Avenue; and WHEREAS, on July 23, 1986„ the Planning Corrmission held a duly advertised public hearing for the abova- described map, FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CIOMONGA PLANNING C-rIlN MION '.ESOLVED AS SECTION 1: That the t "illowing findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement` of the proposed subdivi,�iomi is consistent with the General Plan. ` 3. Tntt the site is 'physically suitabl .. for the proposed develoNr ^ ^fi. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutt'ng property. SECTION 2: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 9829 is hereby approved subject to tTe attache' Standard Conditions: 1 ' 7 --_ A 1. _... Sam fj r y t � �.J APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD.DAY OF JULY, 1986, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF R}OCHO CUCAMONGA k =t:' BY: OennTS L. Stout, Chairman ° ATTEST: Brad Bun er, Deputy Secretary a- f, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of th* Planning Commission of the City of v Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commissioa held on the 23rd day of July, 1986, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: t1f 1. _H E 2 w u O LY X� z n O = � W v O Z L °u a n � V O F H t+l •�9 LCIA _Y.O. VOr u .TV. `y i dada idy 90 aOL m` C VId 61 q 'yu Co. C. u9 a0 Cy': ^ b d WC 'Sm °d tj L.�y m c'E =aaa '1-d A do YN^ as � d J a. toL�YO .u-i aoo c.° NV u- Cy a 4! LL Ca9da CL > L OI'^ ^ =u C DO N E E ppd aa.K q04 r caE 0.A y `. CO _ '6L ~w cb Ate. N ce i6 Y NLCV WL N'Y df Ud No ygLjN �a Nb� L A OL d OqQ 16 0.CC LV .O ~ J A�n Y ^L '6 U•°- qC ^ C qa Ol pl. a1 G SIC E6 L;L U N d da^i u Z.4- 3 U C 6 0.�9 p� O dy 4� nLJ ^NU N N6}� J a tlj .0 6. N J -t i dada idy 90 aOL m` ZafN yG qC1 ^ b d WC 'Sm °d tj m c'E =aaa '1-d A do YN^ as � d J aoNC as .u-i ca °� e 016 Cy 4! LL Ca9da CL > L OI'^ ^ C d N LC E s 61 DO N E E 6 L Y- C aACC 9 ^d 1rq 9N. i6 NLCV WL N'Y Y No ygLjN �a V MN. Y u a� W9 N '6 U•°- x�.... 7 .Y. 90 a^ ac. LO 0.�9 E� � G dy 4� N J -t rs ,a r' 3 } A y. E� °• u A > v W E r v J 6 ... `u m na o,•a, ° a y s L da > ay A `sue °N� A1L YEA =� WLj Nv R L «.Ya IG L L L 6 °c LC L Ij x1 X1 I 1 °' wa iN W L 'aO � LW NL VMV yA'a NL °� c 88 zz EO LN of H b° CN C V T LIL a N N a. V uL0 n u YC b .O v u O 96 Et NW CE 9 6V LL6p> N d.J .+p ° a-u �- uy Nd Oc.r > �m >Q.. E'b •off �C NL Yp 9A 6y n U E. � LY Yp N~Cd ° C CV La > � y Y.� r O `y.. LOO q p �'!� • •`.0 C LL .�L OY w LH ^} oLw ..� -fir. 'b 6 yyO'N tUp q O !� N L� 6w � LT pp6EM �"\ •F+YO M-AnTW nso j, N � 3� V 6u. Lbw v � N L X4 I x1 rs ,a r' 3 IL -� ��-- -- CITY OF R^=.CHuCuCuMvmua STAFF REPORT ' VAT[, July 23, 1986 ~^' TO: Chairman and Members ufthe Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Bruce Cook, Assmci{te Planner ' SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACTS 13057, 13058, 13059, AND 13060 - THE previously approved residential ^~~ tetaling " l� - - . .. ~~ �i and east of the Veer Creek Channel - AnN Avenue, - ' I. BACKGROUND: The above referenced tracts are the ;ubdivisions develope nd used to implement the Area Development Plan for the Victoria Groves -_ '.,.-g. ..~~ Planning Commission aonroved the Victoria Planned Co,ponity. The a Tentative Tracts 13057, 13059, and t it,s regularly Tentative Tentative Tract 13058 was approved at the Planning Comm.ission meeting of May 28, .1986. All four (4) Tentative Tracts were approved with the condition that all off-site improvements for of the -- Tract -3022 be completed prior to the recordation of | subject family parcels ""�_ _-- . -'^ ... ^~~~^ 275 " � ,. ~~ Groves. /v�sc six ' ' parcels correspond to Tentative remainder Tracts 13057 through 13060, the planned school/park --- parcel ~. future development. ~= _ is now requesting an amendment to this Condition of Approval to now permit recordation of the tentative maps RniM to the completion of off-site improvements. Ps proposed, the completio6__of__o_fT_­site improvements will be a prerequisite for any homeowner occupancies of any units within any of th6 subject tracts. I[. ANALYSIS: The original Condition as contained within the approved Resoluti s was first proposed by The William Lyon Company. The Condition required that all of Victoria Groves Loop Road, Victoria Park Lane from Victoria !%.-oves Loop Road to Milliken, and Milliken to Victoria Park Lane to 6ase Line would have to be Completed prior to the recordation of any of the subject maps (see E-Thi-b-i-t-MiDIFT.— The William Lyon Company is requesting this ' amendment strict adherence to the `^~' ti~^^ �=~ a siQnificant hardship for | / their company. As it now stands, they � ) 1T[m K � ` '� - PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT "13057, 12958, 130519, ANiI 13060:': Jul), 23, 1986 Page 2 cannot: receive building permits and begin construction on any dwelling units until such time as the required street improvements are completed. In the normal processing of subdivisions, the City usually does not require the completion of perimeter streets as a prerequisite to recordation of map and issuance of building permits. The William Lyon Campany has committed to completing all required off -site improvements prior to any homeowner's occupant' of any of the units, and has posted bonds for coverage of ai.l" off -site. improvements as is standard procedure with any tract development -. Staff would have no objection to the requested`-a -1endment to the Conditions of Approval as proposed by The William Lyon Company. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project )s consistent with the Victoria Planned ommunity and the General Plan. The project will not be' detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use and site plan, together with the recom mendri Conditions of Approval, as amended, is in compliance klith,.the appiicable provisions of the Victoria Planned Community, the Development Code, and City Standards. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a'public hearing in T e Daily Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices were sent to a property owners within 300 feet of the project site. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning. Commission approve this project through adoption of the attached Resolution. , RI ectfull mit , rad 3ul er City Planner BB:BC:ko Atte.chments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Area Development Pian for Victoria Groves Exhibit "C Tentative Tract 13022 Exhibit "D" - TT 13022 - Required Street Improvements Letter from William Lyon Cu., Dated May 14, 1986 Letter from William Lyon Co., Dated July 7, 1986 Resolution of Approval 0 o U Vl 3HL fI Ui V CITY or,, RAINCI-10 CUCA.N PLANNING DIVISIQ,\j L IONGA ITEM- TITLE- EXHIBIT- "'A it SCALE- ---------- z On Q i < W ;2 z z 0 0 LL -M S T X x LU LU u til en Z Z < ol U Z. < 2- IM uj uj LL w z z Z 5 a 0 0 6 0 - ca Fm LLI L— t V, uj ER 3: 3: F-- Comm LL19 X X , uj w x x LU w > CITY or,, RAINCI-10 CUCA.N PLANNING DIVISIQ,\j L IONGA ITEM- TITLE- EXHIBIT- "'A it SCALE- ---------- AREA DEVEI.,-)PMENT PLAN VICTORIA GROVES Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. ft.. Mkw CONSLI& MC CR0jjP . LMLLIAM LtoM LAND USE LEGEND ANL) UNIT TABULATION PHASE I Lowboo-ril 1*0 A 331 AG 321-M" MA 6t 7 AFFO&4 rip CITY OF IT I-. RANCHO CUCA-1&10,NGA EN PLANNING DINrLSIONT TITLE: SCALE: Y L; I PROPOM PAW o —� —==•x:a Q vu-m MH PHAFM 11 m pq Lora W.0 7m Ao rr Lm :Tao AC 1.2 LOTS �7 TWALS AAa WTS MUSE I[ Ca-M 331 AG 321-M" MA 6t 7 AFFO&4 rip CITY OF IT I-. RANCHO CUCA-1&10,NGA EN PLANNING DINrLSIONT TITLE: SCALE: Y L; I PROPOM PAW o —� —==•x:a Q vu-m MH PHAFM 11 m �7 CITY Or. RANCHO CUCANNIO\GA PLANNING DIVISION f f f 1 1 it �• s i i Fr. 5 1 7 1 I f r�Y1 . 1 1 CITY Or. RANCHO CUCANNIO\GA PLANNING DIVISION f d ITEM TITLE - 3a ` EXHIBIT- —Y2—SCALE:— f f it �• s i i Fr. 5 1 7 1 I f r�Y1 . 1 1 T � � /• � . � N�y� � taiyl� rr ✓ � 4 � f lu - tr > d ITEM TITLE - 3a ` EXHIBIT- —Y2—SCALE:— AREA DEVEI)PMENT PLAN VICTOR�IA GROVES Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. z — % LAND USE LEGEND AND v UNIT UsuLATIoN mw n' q PHASE I xi'TioY 4M &" AC ! w - '. A PHASE 11 M I TT M I I AF 7' CITY OF MAI- RANCHO CUCAMONGA Tfn_E PLAI\ WINU DRTISM EX I i I B rr. SCALE, ce Lam UNA(Z Lots r ­A* " tam I$ UYAC L CDC" 2flo Ad 1.2 jam ToT43 137�'AoQm E1 Mom TarAL 91% xi'TioY 4M &" AC ! w - '. A PHASE 11 M I TT M I I AF 7' CITY OF MAI- RANCHO CUCAMONGA Tfn_E PLAI\ WINU DRTISM EX I i I B rr. SCALE, ce RP,< .F. h � E 8540 ARCHIBALD, SUITE B, RANCH, j UCAMONCA. CA IW3P (714 ) 980- 2244 Mal 14, 1986 re OF p HO C � Mr. Dan Cor` eman LAN" p {� 1 City tf Rancho Cucamonga MAY 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C 71�J9110 , ,` d M Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 111114 PM k Project: Victoria Groves Tracts 13GS -. 13058, 13059 & 13060 s� t' Subject: Planning Conditions of Approval Dear Dan, PursuanP ,.o our May 12th discussion, we would like to request that Planning i Divisic, Condition No. 1 for Tracts 13057, 13059 & 13060 be modified to read l as follows: Prior to recordation of Tract all Conditions of Approval applicable to an imposes% upon Tentative Tract 13022 shall be complied with including, but not limited to, completion of offsite improvements. Additionally, the east —west trails between 13057 & 13058 and 13058 and the school /park site, As well as Groves Park improvements, shall be t' completed prior to the cccupancy of any dwelling units. Also, on Tract 13057 Plorning Division Condition No, 11, we would request that that be clarified to indicate that that is only a lot to lot grade differential. Our concern is that the slope from Highland door to the ' first tier o` lots adjacent to Highland is in stme insC;aaces greater than twelve feet. That has been specifically discussed and reviewed by the Design Review Committee and the Grading Committee on several diffetsnt occasions and the way the Condition currently reads, it does not specifically exclude that slope along Highland. Your presentation of this request to the Planaing Commissior, is sincerely apprecfiated. Please contact me fo.r any additional information we can pTe_1A Rully, \ � ord Project Manager SF /lmb REAL ESTA'[E DEEVELO,WENT 1 `�:; � �%� z4TLLL�.'d� L'T'V:` �+;�` <i � Ir ` f�rr.• >�, (j 6540 ARCH IBALD, SUITE Q. RANCHO CUCAMONGA.CA 01730, 14) 980 -2244 July 7, 1986 Mr. Brad Buller �RECEIVED- I. CfiY OF RANCHO CUCAMOaGA Planning Commi: sion PLANNING DIVISION City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C JUL 0 $ 186 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 AM 7 8►91101ll11Z1112131415i6 x PROJECT: !Victoria Groves SUBJECT: Tentar "e Tracts 13057, 13058, 13059 & 13060 Dear Brad, I? Pursuant to my meeting with Dan Coleman and Bruce. Cook this morning regarding these subject tracts, we would like to "request that the Planning Commission modify Planning Division Condition ,#1 on each of the referenced tracts. We would request that this condition be modified to read as follows: "Prior to recordation of Tract all conditions of approval applicable to asl imposed upon Tentative Tract 13022 shall be complied with, with the exception of offsite improvements, which shall be completed prior to the homeowner occupancy of the first unit within this tract.,' Our request is so chat building pesnits could be issued for both model compt=es and production units on these tracts prior to the referenced improvements being complete. We fully support the desire P of the City o h y have these done prior to homeowner occupancies but delaying recordation of the maps and thereby any building permits beinn issued until all of those improvements are complete would be a significant hardship to our company and to the successful completion of the Project. We would also like to point out that all of the improvements for Tract 13022 have been fully bonded at this time. Please contact me for any additional information we can provide regarding this matter. Thank you for your help and support in bringing this matter to the Planning Commission. Respebtfully, Leven Ford Project Manager SF :lmb 5 REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT k RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING THE AMENDMENT TO CONDITION NO. 1 OF PLANNING FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13060, THE WILLIAM LYON COMPANY, ;i LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD WHEREAS, on the 7th day of July, 1986, an amendment was filed by The William Lyon Company, for review of the above - described project; and WHER €AS,_Qh the 23rd day of duly, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That tha amendment to Condition No. 1 of Planning for Tentative—Tract 13060 shy,% read as: Prior to recordation of Tract 13060, all Conditions of Approval applicable to avid imposed upon Tentative Tract 13022 shall be complied with, with the exception of off -site improvements whiJi shall be completed prior to the homeowner occupancy of the first unit within this Tract. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF JULY, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chat -an ATTEST: Brad u er, Deputy Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission -of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of July, 1986, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: A --- CITX OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE; July ?qy 1986 TO: Chairman and Members of the'Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Debra Meier, Assistant Planner w *o G�!CAMO,V a,2 i f1 O O F Z v > 197 1 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 86 -12 - wEb1EKN SERVICES COMPANY The es a 57s enl of an automobile leasing office and general administrative offices, in an existing building, with a lease space of ',750 square feet on 1.66 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 4) located at 9375 Archibald Avenue - APN 210- 071 -47. I. PROJECT At'D SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a Conditional Use Permit and issuance of a Regative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zonin North - SCE Substation; u area 4 South - Industrial Park; ISP Subarea 4 East - Industrial; ISP Subarea 4 West - Viney,rd; ISP Subarea 16 C. General Plan Designations: 1 ojec ems-- General - Industrial North - General Industrial Sour,: - General Industrial - East - General Industrial West - Industrial Park D. S'`te Characteristics: The site is an existing Industrial usiness Park wilK a campus -like setting containing approximately 23,000 square feet of building space. The site is fully improved and landscaped and 96 standard size parking spaces are available on site. E. �Applicable Regulations: The proposed use is clAssified as elm sTra Ive and Office which is a con4itionally permitted use in Subarea 4. • L_.- ITEM L I` PLANNING COK41SUON STAFF REPORT CUP 86-12 - Western Services Company July 23y 1986 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: A. General• The applicant is currently operating from the pre" ises without the required Conditional Use Permit. The business at this location consists of administrative duties of Western Services Company including, locating and obtaining financing for automobiles per client requests, contracting For repairs of mobile homes, and the administration of a security guard and patrol service. They have about seven employees at the office at any one time and operate from 9 :00 a.m. until 8 :00 p.m. The venicies for lease are stored at Vineyard West Storage Yard located at 8646 Vineyard Avriue. The applicant was made aware of the requirement for the Conditional Use permit in January of this year. It became an issue involving code enforcement when other on -site businesses and their customers were complaining of an on -site parking problem. The problem was the result of lease vehicles being store4 on- `site. This meant that Western Services was utilizing more than the percentage of parking spaces allowed to them. Th >v are allotted by percentage (1/250 sq. ft.) the use of 15 on -site spaces. Those spaces are for use by employees, clients and any accessory vehicles brought to the site for leasing purposes. The parking problem was brought to their attention and they have apparently worked out a solution that has alleviated the problem. A recommended condition of approval of this Conditional Use Permit is that at no time shall more than the allotted 15 on -site parking spaces be utilized by the users of this business. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The proposed use is in accordance with the General an, tfie objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the Industrial Specific Plan Subarea in which the site is located as evidenced by the Conditional Use Permit provision far administrative and office uses in this Subarea. The proposed use, together with the recommended Conditions of approval, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or ;nateri'ally injurious to properties or improvements in the area. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan. IY. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has t?; °,An advertised as a public hearing in The at y Report newspaper, the property posted and notices sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project. J — �P, s. x 7. PLANNING COMAlI55ION STAFF REPORT �4 CUP 06 »12 - Western ServUes Company tf. July 23, 2986 r Page 3 Y. RECOMMENDATION: Stab recommends that the Planning Corrdrtiss on issue a ego sve Declaration and approve Conditional use Permit 86 .12 throu0i adoption of the attached., Resolution and Conditions of Approval., Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Pidnner €f' BB:DM, ns `+ Attachments: Applicant's Letter Exhibit "A° - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Resolution of Approval with Ondit ons - r`` (714) 945-9712, ($00) 325- a667?'. ` Maim Auf4 2mik`i "'00M. Office o 9.375 Archibald Ave.. Ste. 108, Rancho Cucmonga, CA 91730 City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 803 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 e_ Res Conditional Use Perm } To Whom rt May Concern: b We have entered into a lease agreement with the Sarnikian Company for an office at 9375 Archi.b.,,ld Ave., #108, Rancho Cucamonga. our Proposed use of the described office suite,is for a sales admir,- istrative, office. We are an Auto ProFsrty Management Company, We locate automobiles and obtain financing for our clients. The automobiles that are brought into our company are stored at Vineyard West Storage Yard, located at 8545 Vineyard Ave., Rancho Cucamonga. As per our lease agreement, we ars a loci::ted 15 parking spaces to be utilized durin} business hours. We do riot exceed thi, limit. Western ServicE Y0 includes a mobile home service and repair c c,mpany. We pe, � minintrative duties only for our sub - contra!,; #ed Gobs. We alao ha.. gture plans to expand to a. security guard and i patrol company. TiAs elite security company wi'l employ off --duty Police Officers to be used for personal protection. If you have any further questions regarding Western Services, please feel free to contact me at the above number. Sincerely, i Chuck A- Sheets CS /ns • t�, r �SG 51. zoo rC VL d t, 01.2 Par. 3. a a 2.9 1) 491AC 6.40AC AC. "no .a3 .n Ali to ASSO.fl4R2 oar �4 A r8SF R/W " f Pant ? 4,25AC. _ Z 3.51 AC. P Hn WdA +`s . u + = A Par 2 �5 q' .2'3351 v g ` 's $6 9 dS 1PLd 5 Pat 4 53r 'rat 5 3.33 AC— am s R 2.28AC` , s.• r... 2 . •` - 486.9? 4; �_. _ -,� Fas t o ly Q tp S $ ease 5 e ro 238AC.'+ g SO 4.63Aq55o 9St1 rrza7 9SGo .sre v 36.22 A C M/L t 09ew 4l _ 1 c 119 AC c 96p° y 't 9 ;30. G8 1 39 p ,�1.14Ac .�.../� A 9S .tzw.m , ! =5 fiP.E`I z MAP 804-Sa -2G ` a PAR. 18 35 u • 5 + m � ��` � z.2aac.h 29 � :� Par -I la 1s AC 4# ati 2't ,� r PAr.2 to 2 In F ^n�2.20aC. 7 SAN BERNARDWO 1fTTJ ST .Cfso Jaa. JOID NORTH CITY 4-`I.��.' PLlwfi iNu DivbgKDN _ ` G�CHIBI7': i -'mow, ,.71.1 LE- Ile V-4 441. 47 ........... !t ►IZi�t( t1�'�tEi��ii�l� }�!� e} I J. L FFT J-41 71 CITY OF RANCHO cLTCAMOINGA PLANNING DfW&a,4 rrEN1: Tnu- EXHIBri - ' RESOL" -ION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86 -12 FOR WESTERN SERVICES COMPANY LOCATED AT 9375 ARCHIBALD AVENUE IN THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 25th day e° June, 1986, a complete application was filed by Western Services Company fur, review of the above - described projec{, and - WHEREAS, on the 23rd day of July, 1886, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above- described project. f. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows SECTION 1: That the following findings can be mPt: s 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the ob;;eotives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, ar materially injurious to properties or -Improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment a— nU— at a Negative Declaration is issued on July 23, 1986. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 86 -12 is approved subject tote oilowin3 conditions: 1. Parking of employees, clients or accessory vehicles brought on site for any reason, shall not use more than a total of 15 parking spaces at any one time. x.- Resolutfon No. Page . ?, APPRSVit AND ADOPTED 1'�IIS 23RD DAY OF JULY, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CIV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGR BY., Dennis L. Stout, -uhairmq ✓�` ATTEST: ra Buller, eq y serretary I, Brad Buller, F*eputy :Secretary of the ,Planning CdOnission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoi,pg Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and " adopted, by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, ,at a regular meeting of the Planning C.oranission held on the 23rd day of Julyj 19 $161 by the following vote --to -wit; AYE;: COMMISSIONERS: g" NOES- COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: J, I 1] tNTM T 1111 n A kTr%TY o A aankTl[ A — va ++ v+ a.a aa....raa+. vv vaaa.avav v.:A. soj�Ll'n`IIgO c z DATE: July 23, 1986 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Warren, Associate planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT - SCHLOSSFR FORGE I. ABSTRACT: The Planning Commission he°d a Public Hearing to rconsider-the approval of. a Development Agreement between the 'Ci'ty and the owners of Schlosser Forge. This repart Summarizes the text of the agr« "ent, its purpose, and recommends approval of the document. II. BACKGROUND: At the June 25, 1985 meeting, the Planning Commission approve a revision to the Industrial Area., Specific Plan. A significant change to the document was the r %,: ication of certain Minimum Impact /Heavy Industrial District boundaries to a less intensive land use (General Industrial). During its deliberation, the Planning Commission recognized that existing Heavy Industrial uses immediately adjacent to the proposed boundary change may have their future development expansion potential affected by more stringent development and performance standards. It was further determined by the Planning Coirarission that a Deveiopment Agreement protecting potential business expansion for existing industrial facilities would be appropriate in conjunction with a land use change. Schlosser Forge plant is a site which could be- affected in this manner. The recommended changes to the ISP posed the redistricting of Subarea 8 along the eastern side of the Schlosser Forge site. The Planning Commission conditi lied its approval of the land use change on the establishment o' a Development Agreement acceptable to the City and the aropeTus owners. I!I. a SCUSSION: The draft agreement allows for the .planned expansion fsee cti. nn 7) of the Heavy Industrial use, Schlosser Forge, on the properties currently owned and occupied by the business as detailed in the accompanying Master Plans. Provisions of the document are as follows: A. Compliance with existing land use performance standards. ITE4 ti " ro � PLANNING REPORT, Development Aj#-eeMdnt Srhlo2iier urge July 23. 2986 ` .. Page 2 B. The term of the agreement is to be twenty -five (25) years. C. Compliance with City procedural guidelines and requirements fur development. D. Allows for the customary `and usual auctions for public improvements and payment of fees which may be levied against properties in conjunction with further development. IV. ANALYSIS: The Agreement, if enacted, provides property and usli "(mess owners with. -:the assurance that they may develop the forge facility without fear of being "dowo= zoned" as the result of neighboring land use pressures, From the Crty's point of view, the Agreement will aid in dissolving the perceived . land use conflicts which can result from industrial uses of varying intensity. The legal counsel, staff and the property owners find the Agreement satisfactory with one staff rr ,mmended change. Section 10-B (page 9) should be changed to read 49'foll6ws: B. in the event that the City imposes an areawide moratorium affecting all sisilarily situated ;industrial property, the City wound not be required to issue permits or approval until such moratorium has been lifted or terminated. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning oCR s on recommend to the City Council the adoption of the attached Agreement. Res ctfully s itt Brad Buller City Planner BB:AW:ns Attachments: Development Agreement i •I f� MAURICC O. COVINGTON ` MARDLD A SAILIN SAMUEL_ROWC OEOROC W. PORTER' RORCM C. DOUGHCRTV DONALD O. HASLAM ` Yom~ ROYkRT/ SCHAUER 'yy1 CONARO A. HOPSON P J. ANTHONY SMITH $TCPHr.F R. WAOC JCT'C R. AMOER3011 r WORCY A. PCRAI f /AHOALL J PITRC PCTCR M AARMACK i4 VAACV L. TIOR.A" mCRALb R OATL?N ' SHEILA M JANCS "MANIC /ISCH CovtNGTON 6 CROWS ATTOilNCY'3 �T Ln.sf • 119t WCST SIXTH S'rREET 1CLCPMONC POST Orrice Box 1515 M-16.3.030 ONTARYQ, CALIFORNIA 511762 July 1r 1986 Brad Buller, City Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga P.U. tox 807 Rancho Cucamonga, rA 91730 RE: Schlosser Forge Development A reea nt { Dear Mr. Buller: P17tase find enclosed a revised draft Development Agreement wyn I have modified in accordance with our meeting of June 25, 1986. I believe that I have incorporated the major changes requested by both your staff and Jim Markman and have also incorporated some of the other changes which Otto Kroutil had put into his draft. We are anticipating that this draft and the accompanying Staff Report can be placed on the Planning Commission agenda for July 23, 1986. Because of the time constraints, I have 1 not had an opportunity to circulate the revised draft to our clients at-Schlosser Forge for their review. I do not anti- cipate that anything in the Agreement will be objectionable r to them but I will contact you well in advance of the 23rd of July if we need to make minor modifications in the language before that public hearing. We would hope that this draft for any minor modifications that the City Attorney's Office or that we may request;) can be heard on July 23, 1986, so that the process of public hearing through the City can be expedi- ted. I have forwarded a copy of this revised draft and of this letter to the City Attorney for his review. i i ^Y� Brad Buller, City Planner July 1, 1586 Page Two ., i We would appreciate receiving the a copy of the Staff Report at earliest o pportunicy that the same has been prepared so that we may be prepared to answer any ques -bons or concerns raised by staff at the pub1';- hearing of July 23 1986, Edward., . Hops ----- Covington a .; of ¢¢rave EAH:jnh co: Phil Schlosser _,�?' John Ui Gall James Mar)zman I9, �;: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. Recitals. ., ,... 1 2. Definitions nitions..................... ..... .. !�• 4 3. DescriPttion of Real Frarartv....... .... ................... 4 4. Interest of,Property Otvners.,...R............ ...... . .. 4 5. Binding Effect of Aare ement.,.....a....R........a.... „ 5 6, Relationship of Parties .............:........... ...... 5 7. Purpose of Agreement .................. 8. Applicable General Plan and Zone Designation....... .a,. 6 9. Term of Aareement ............... ............ 10. Time and Rate of Construction ....... .... .. „ 7 11. Effect of Transfer. of Real Property to Another 3urisdiotion. 9 12. Specific Restrictions and Entitlements on Development of the _Real Property .... ............................... i4 10 �� 13. H Hold armless....... 11 14. Effect of-Development. Agreement on Land Use Revelations.... 14 15. Amendment or Cancellation of Aareement...... ............. 12 16. Enforcement .......................... 12 17. Event of Default .................... I........... o ..... 14 18. Procedure upon Defa:llt ................. ................... 14 19. Cumulative Remedies . ........................ ..... ,,, 15 20. Recordation ............................................. 16 21. Rights of Lender..........,........... . ............. 16 22. Environmental Impact Report,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 0,,,,,,,,,....... 17 23. General... ............................. ....�.,.........,. 17 a DEVELOPMENT AGREMENT THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this .ay of 1956, by and between PHILLIP D. SCHLOSSER AND ELAINE M- SCHLOSSER, husband and wife, as Community proper- ty, ALBERT W. HOLGUIN, JR. AND ROBERTA J. HOLGUIN, husband a and wife, as community property, JEFFREY P. SCHLOSSER AND JACQUELINE L.. SCHLOSSER, husband and wife, as community property,. 4nd DAVID M. RICHARDSON AND JEAX M. RICHARDSON, t husband and wife, as community property ( "Property Owners ") �. and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a mun9c:ipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California ("City"). ` 1. ReOtals. t A. Government Code sections 65864- 65895.5 auth- orize the City to enter into binding development agreements "• with persons having legal or equitable interests in real property for the development of such property. AB. The parties collectively described herein as Pt,iperty Owners are the owners in fee simple absolute of approximately twenty -seven and seven - tenths (27.7) acres of real property, more or less, bounded by Rochester Avenue on the east and Arrow Route on the north, located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga', County of San Bernardino, state of California, more specifically described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (here- inafter referred to as the "Real. Property "). As of Lhe rte_ r W date hereof; .Property „wners have constructed on the real property four (4) buildings containing approximate y one hundred thirty thousand (130,000) square feet, The imp" Xoved portion of the Real Property, however, currently �nly,!occu_ Pies approximately seven, and seven — tenths(? 73 - acres. There are approximately twenty (20) gross acres of develop- able but unimproved real property remaining in the Real Property. Property Owners have developed a conceptual piaster plan for the Real Property showing possible improve- ment to be constructed over the next five (s) yearrI and over the following fifteen (15) to twenty -five (25) yeaz -;. These conceptual plans are attuche(l hereto, marked Exhibits "B" and "C" respectively, and incorporated herein by refer- ence. These conceptual plans are attached for illustrative i Purposes one; final improvement plans and final alte plans ...... r..c�......,..r. muse be approved by the City using the criteria established ..r..,...�. Goormwo. At final buildaut, it is contemplated by Property Owners that the Real. Property could contain at least eleven' (11) buildings, having a total gross square footage of i between four hundred thousand (400,0'00) to five hundred thousand (500,000} square feet; .all such developmant is subject to applicable standards. J C. The Real property is currently being used for heavy industrial manufacturing. The Real, Property currently has a designation under the Rancho Cucamonga Industrial: Area Specific Plan (hereinafter "IASP ") of Minimum Im pactfHeavy 2 rY t E4 4 Industrial.' Allowable activities w *th-:, the Minimum Impact /Heavy Industrial area include manufacturing, pmces ling, fabrication, warehousing, storage and freight handling. Uses - typical of chose allowed within the area are forge shops, steel milling facilities, plasti- plants, steel fabrication and.,metal fabricating facilities, woodworking facilities, macAire shops and chemial storage and distribu- tion, The Real Property further falls within Subarea 9 in the !ASP. As such, the steal Property is subject- tom _ e-ne hundred (100) foot right -of -way (fifty (50) feet from center Line) for both Rochester AvenLe and Arrow Route, and a forty -five (45) feat landscaping requirement (measure3 from ulEimate face of curb, for bath streets). D. The manufacturing uses currently conducted on the property result in some noise and vibrations and other impacts on the Real Property. It is not anticipated that these impacts will lessen in the future os with additi,_ it ' construction on the Real Property and may, in fact, increase. Operations currently conducted on the Real Property shall not violate applicable ordinances and vr. performance standard$C, however E. Property Owners have requested the City to enter into a development agreement and proceedings have been taken in accordance with City's rules and regulations. F. The City has found that this proposed M_Nelopoent Agreement is consistent with t;',e General Plan, the IASP and 3 T To, 11 °-ae goals and objectives of each. On , 1936, City adopted Ordinance No. approving the Development Agreement with the Property Owners and the ordinance thereafter toots effect on 1586. 2. Definitions. In this Agreement, nnle�s the context otherwise reqaires, the following terms shall have the following meaning: I A. "City" is the city of Rancho Cucamonga. B. "Project" is the development consisting of building and improvements which may be constructed by Property Owners on the Real,1:1roperty, described further in I paragraph 8 below. C. "Property Owners" ade PHILLIP D. SCHLOSSER,, ELAINE M. SCHLOSSER, ALBERT w. HOLGUIN, JR., ROBERT J. HOLGUIN, JEFFREY P. SCHLOSSER, JACQUELIRE L. SCHLOSSER, MVID M. RICHARDSON, JEAN M. RICHAAR14-343N, and includes all of ' their heirs, successors, administrators, personal repre- sentatives, successors in interest and assigns. D. "Real Property" is the real property referred to in paragraph 1C above. 3. Description of Re 31 Property. The Real Property which is the subject of this Agreement is described m..re fully in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporatee,, herein by reference. 4. Interest Of Property Owners. Property Owners rep- Ask 3 i 4 V . 1 resent that they have full legal tita.e to the Real Property, that they have full legal right to enter into this Agreement and to the best of their knowledge that there is no person or entity which has any other interest in fee ownership to the Real Property, Property Owners further represent that t'. i._ all other persons and entities who may hold legal or equit- able interest in the Property agree to be and are bound by this Agreement. If there are 4ny holders of deeds of trust on she Real Property which may be seni- to the lien of this Development Agreement, the holders .,. such deeds of trust have assented to the terms; of this Development Agreement in writing and agree to be bound by the provisions hereof. S. Binding Effect of Agreemenntt. The burder,� of this Agreement shall run 9;th the Real Property and shall bind, and the benefits of this Agreement shall inure to, the i successorp in interest and assigns of the parties to it.. 6. Relationship of Parties. It is understood that '• the contractual. relationship between the City and the Property Owners is such that the _ 'operty Owners are indep- endent contractors and are not the acaats of City for any purpose whatsoever. 7. Purpose of Agreement. Tire purpose of this Agree- ment is to guarantee the Property Owners that they will be able to develop, construct upon and build out improvements on the balance of the Real Property consistent with the current Minimum Impact /Heavy Industrial use of the Real 5 Property, and under the current restrictions, regulations and entitlements of the city including, but not limited to, the 2� ASP nd Subarea 9 thereof- For this purpose, it is intended that neither this Agreement nor any pYovision hereof should restrict the ability Of Property Ownets to build out and develop the balance of the Real Property � I following the guidelines, specifics and requirements of the VVrS3,ides Further, neither this Agreement nor any part thereof any guarantee to ,the City of any future development of the unimproved portion of the Real Property. 5� ApAl,ieable� General_ Plan,_and Zone Des Gnat an. The IASP designation hor the Real Property is Minimum Impact /Heavy Industrial established by the TASF adopted by the City Council of City on August 19, 1981. All of the provisions of th IA ', as amended, in effect as of the date hereof are incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full. The allowable uses,,%development restric- tions and performance criteria and standards for development within said IASP and specifically Subarea 9 thereof are incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full; specific sections of the /IAS and requirements and entitlements of Subarea 9 are at ached as Exhibit "D" hereto and incorporated into this Development Agreement by this t reference. t 9.. Term of Agreement. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the date hereof, regardless of the date of t 6 i 7 -13 actual enecut4on hereof, and sha2,1 continue.for twenty -five (25) years and may be extended by City any Property Owners thereafter. - 10. Time _�jd Rate of Construction. The City may im- pose no time limit on Property Owners' ability to construct improvements on the Real Property, nor may the City imposp any type of restriction on the Real, Property or the Property Owners as to the rate of constructio -n an the Real Property (whether to limit the number of square feet built per year, number of fi-le hydrants available to the Real Property, or any other similar or dissimilar type of restriction). At any tine in the future as Property Owners may seek approval to construct additional improvements on the Real Property, except as provided herein City shall place no restrictions as to rate of dEVelopment, the number of square feet whict, " may be built or occupied in any period or calendar year or any other limitations whatsoever on the Property Owners* '. ability to construct the improvements. Notwithstanding the 40 qft generality of the foregoing, the City may require Property Owners to comply with all of the rAes, rsjulations, ordin- ances and codes currently applicable in the TASP or Subarea 9 thereof. The City may also require compliance with pro- cedural guidelines and requirements, providing only that such procedural guidelines and requirements do not violate the letter or the spirit of this Agreement. The City may not impose any special building restrictions or special. fees 7 -13 g ti or assessments as a condition to approval of development on the Real Property which are different titan those imposed on development ar construction of heavy industrial improvements similarly .sl uated. in -the Cit'� '- However, the City inay impose such fees and assessments on applications for development approvals on the Real Property and such fees and assessments permits and as conditions to approval as_ are applied to all minimum impact heavy industrial property city -wide. In the event that Property Owners request approval of plans to construct improvement- an the Real Property, City shall romptly process the same without unreasonable delay. Such plans shall be reviewed by the City in accordance with standards and requirements currently applicable to the current zoning and IASP designation fo, the Real Property, as is more fully described in paragraph 9 above. If the plans for the future improvements proposed to be constructed by Property Owners are consistent Vith the ` rules and - standards now in effect relating to the construc- tion of improvements in Subarea 9 (Minimum Impact/ Heavy Industrial) of the 1ASP of the City, such plans shall be approved by the City in zuch form as it normally provides for like approvals. Notwithstanding the generaiity of the foregoing, the City shall not be required to allow such development and/or construction in the following circum- stances: A. If Property Owners had failed or refused to Ask R 14 °y comply with':a condition of approval imposed by the city consistent with the provisions of the current zoning and JV; I' IASP designation to a previous or contemporaneous applica- tion or permit issued or conditional {iy issued to Property Owners, City would not be required to make additional ,x approvals until Property Owners had complied with such conditions; that B. In the event t C" ity imposes an area _ widro moratorium affecting all industrial property, the City would not required to issue permits or approvals until such moratorium had been Lifted or terminated; i i C. Where the City is under some form of legal restriction (as where third persons or entities have legally)' prohibited City from issuing development approvals for similar projects) from issuing permits to Proparty Owners, the City shall use its best efforts to lift such restrction to enable Property Owners to exercise their rights under this Agreement but shall be under no obligation to finalize approvals until such third party restriction has be _en Lifted; and D. The Cty would have no legal obligation to issue additional approvals or permits if Property Owners were in default under this Agreement, until the default of Property Owners had been remedied or eliminated. 11. Effect of Transfer of Real Property to Another Jurisdiction. If all or any portion of the Real Property 9 a. _. _ subject of this Agreement is annexed to or otherwise becomes part of another city, this Agreement shall terminate 'forthwith. 12. Specific Lestrictions and Entitlements on Dev<-lop- ment of the Real`Pronerty. In addition to the IASP and zoning classification described above, the epecific restric- tions, perforutance criteria and entitlement of Subarea 9 of the IASP, set forth at length in Exhibit "D" hereto, shall, together with other applicable Codes and requirements, and construction on the Real Property for heiant and narking restriatians_ htii in:g $i_te- eoaeraa buld�ag setbacks, j site landscapina, noise levels and so forth. The following shall also control the use and future development of the Real Property: A. Permitted uses on or of the Real Property shall be any permitted or conditionally permitted use which ' may currently be made on real property located in the IASP and desia�naltgL Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial in the City, as set forth more specifically in Table III -1 of Exhibit "D" hereto.. B. The City may not require indirectly (whether by way of fee, its lieu contribution or otherwise) exactions or compliance on the part of Property Owners other than as specifically set forth in this Agreement. Notwithstanding the generalitv__of___the foregoing_ the City may require 10 r • Ji, payment of natmal and usual pro ess� ina�filina and permit fees. The a .,....�, w.. .» .. ... City may aTen, rarrinir �T ��... ..a ,..i and assessments which may be levied or assessed against the Real Property and adgacent.or conti. ua s_ vronerties (such as raw. 1911 Act asses %nappni -, Al ef-ri rnt- light maintenance district as "ssments), 13. 4Bold Harmless, Property owners agree to and shall hold City, its officers, agents, employees and representa- tives, harmless from liability for damage or claims for damage for personal injury including death and claims for property damage which may arise from the direct or indirect operation of Property Owners or those of their contractors, subcontractors, agents, employees or any rather person or entity acting on their behalf which would relate to the :Real Property, the operation of improvements currently thereon, or the construction of any future improvements ' thereon. Property Owner agrees to and shall defend City and its officers, agents, emp .,gees and representatives from actions for damages to third persons or entities caused by or alleged to have been caused by reason of Property Owners' activities in connection with this Development Agreement or with the Real Property. This hold harmless provision applies to all damages and claims for damage suffered or alleged to have been suffered by reason of tht,, operations referred to in this Development Agreement, regardless of �1 j whether or no. the City prepared, supplied �r approved the lift ( plans, specifications or other documents for the Project. 14. Effect of Develonment Agreement on Land Use ReQUl- ations. The rules, regulations and official poliiies gover- ning permitted uses and development of the Peal Property during the term of this Agreement "KIensity and intensity of dew1 opment on the Real Property, and design and improvement i standards and specifications applicable to construction of improvements on the Real Property during the term of this Agreement, are these rules, regulations, official policies and standards in f -)rce at the time of this Agreement and not as the same may be changed, modified or supplemented from time to time in the future. Standards imposed on actual construction of improvements (the Uniozm Building Code) and reviews and standards imposed by third persons and entities :(SCAQMD, Cucamonga County water District, and so Earth) shall be those which are imposed at the time me ofLappr any development request for all or ° �y portion of the R, -41 Prop.oe e— rtiro . 15. Amendment o!_C- ricellation of Agreement. This Agree- ment may be amended or cancelled in whole or in part only by mutual written consent of the parties and then in the manner provided for in Government Code sections 65868, et seq. 16. Enforcement. Unless amended or cancelled as pro- vided in this Agreement, this Development Agreement is enforceable bv, any party hereto no`hwithstanding a change in 12 3 1t1n- j�� the IASP, or any General or Specific Plan, or any applicable zoningg tandards or regulations adopted by the City which alter or amend the rules, regulations or p6licies currently governing permitted uses of the Real Property, or density, design and /or, improvement standards and specifications therefor. In fhe event of a,default under the provisions of this Agreement, by Property � ?wners, City may given written notice to the Property Owners by personal service on the representative thereof (or his or her successor) at the address set forth below, or by registered or certified mai', addressed to Property Owners at the address stated in this; Agreement, or to such other addresses as may have bejn . designated by Property Owners. If'such, violation is not corrected to the reasonable satisfaction of the City within thirty (30) days after the date such notice is given,. City may, on thirty (30) days written notice, declare a default under this Agreement and, upon any such a:claration of ` default and after providing any required trme to cure or to begin to effect a cure, the City may bring any action neces- sary to enforce the obligations of Property Owners arising out of the operation of this Development Agrse'Aient. Upon written notice to City and provision of a thirty (30) day period to cure or begin to effect a cure, Property Owners may declare a default under this Agreement. Upon any such declaration of default by City or Property Owners, the party giving the declaration may bring any action necessary to 13 M-17 - enforce the obligations to the other party arising out of M M A-4 - 4 the operation of this Development Agreement, apply to any court, state or federal, for specific performance of the provisions of this Development Agreement or for an injunc -} tion against any violation by the other party of any provi- h sions hereof, or for any such other relief as may be appro -- Priate. It is agreed by both parties that the injury to the non - breaching party arising out of a default under any of the ter.as of this Development Agreement would be irreparable and that it would be extremely difficult to ascertain the amount of compensation tv the non - breaching party to afford adequate relief in light of the purposes and policies advanced and satisfied by the approval o_ ,she eventual Light of Property Owners -� build out the Real Property, to house their husi.ness thereon, and by this Development Agreement. 13. Event of Default. Either party shay_ be in default under this Agreement upon the happening of one or more of the following events or conditions; A. Breach by either party of any of the provi- sions or terms of this Agreement, after notice and «n opportunity to cure has been provided, if no acts to cure the breach or default are commenced within the time period after. service or the notice of default on the other party and thereafter diligently co<:tinued to completion. 18. Procedure Upon Default. A. Upon the occurrence of an event of default 1 which has gone unremedied, the non- breaching party, at its election, may terminate this Agreement. $., The non- breaching party does not naive any claim of defect in the :performance by the breaching party of the terms and provisions of this Agreement if the non- breaching party does not propose to modify or terminate this Agreement. C!" C. lion- performance shall not be excused because t r: of tae failure of any third person or entity. F D. An express repudiation, refusal or renuncia- tion of this Agreement, if the same is in writing and signed by the property Owners, shall be sufficient to terminate this Agreement and a hearing in the matter shall not be required, E. All other remedies at law or in equity which r are not otherwise provided in this Agreement or in the regulations of City governing development agreements gener- ally are available to the parties hereto in the event that there is a breach of this Development Agreement, r 19. Cumulative Remedies. The respective rights and remedies provided by this Development Agreement or by Saw or available in equit.1 shall be cumulative, and the exercise of any one or more of such rights or remedies shall not pre- clude or affect the exercise, at the same or at different times, of any other such rights or remedies for the same or different defaults or beaches or for the sme or different 1s �v��ai fai:.uzes to perform or observe any term or Provision of this Agreement. 20. Recor.dati% This Agreement shal"' at the expense of the Property Owners, box recotied in the Official Records a of the County Of San Bernardino in accordance with provi I I s,.ons of the Government Code, and a cony of—tt2e ra�srcLer3 instrument delivered to City by property Owner. w�rr�r Owner s. 21. Rights of Lander. Should'Property Owners incur any encumbrance on the Real Iproperty, the., lender having such encurAtrance shall have the right at any t ;.me during the term of this Agreement and the existen::e of said encumbrance to: A. Do any act or thing required of Property Owners under this Agreement, and by such act or thing done �. and performed by lender shall be as effective as if done by Property Owners .th;. --- aelves. B. Realize on the security afforded by the encumbrance by exercising foreclosure proceedings or power of sale or other remedy afforded in law or in equity or by the security instrument ( "trust deed ") in '.he event of default thereunder and to: (i) Transfer, convey or assign the title of Property Owners to eny purchaser in arFy foreclosure sale, whether the foreclosure :ale be conducted pursuant to court order or pursuant to a power of sale contained in the trust deed, (ii) Acquire and succeed to the intr.-rest 16 of Proper ty'•O wners by virtue of any foreclosure sale, whether the foreclosure sale be conducted pursuant to a court order or pursuant to a power of sale contained in. -the trust deed. Foreclosing lenders or purchasers at for�-�losure sales of any kind shall be considered to be suace_ssors in interest of Property Owners for all pure ^ses wider this Agreemer.t. 22. Environmental Im*act Retort. Property Owners acknowledge that, hider current City ordinances and regula- tions, further development on the Real Property might be subject to an environmental impact analysis and preparation of an environrn� nt.al impact report. AI In this regard, it is the e;-; - -.ess intention of the parties to preserve, as much as is leg,-.' .1y possible, the abality for Property Owners to A-ild out and improve the baleace of the Real Property consistent with current ordinances and regulations irrespec- tive o�: land use changos which may occur in other areas and on other contiguous or proximate properties. 23. General. A. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes all agreements, representations, warranties, statements, promi- ses and/or understandings, whether oral or written, with respect to the subject matter hereof and no party shall be bound by any such representation, statement, promise or understanding not specifically set fortis in thin Agreement. 17 A1- 03 4 B. Notice. All Notices under this Agreement shall be in writing and, shall be delivered by personal service, or by certified or registered mail, postage pre- paid, return receipt requested, to the parties. Any "ritten notice to any of the parties required or permitted hereunder 'gall be deemed to have been duly given on the date of service if served personally or seventy -two (72) hours after the mailing. Rejection or of her re :sisal to accept or the inability to delivez because of changed address of which no -Iotioe was given as provided hereunder shall be deemed to be receipt of the notice, dei.and or request sent. Notices to the parties shall be addressed as set forth at the conclu- sion of this Agreement. By giving the other party at least thirty (30) days written notice thereof, the_ parties hereto shall have the right from time to time or at an•r time during the torm hereof to change their.: respective addresses for notice. C. Severabil tv. In the event that any of the provisions, or portions thereof, of this Agreement ai held to be unenforceable or invalid by my court of competent jurisdiction, the validity and enforceability of the remaining provisions, or portions thereof, shall not be affected th-reby. D. GoverD;',na Law, This Agreement shall be con- strued and governed in accordance with the laws of the State of aalifornia now in effert. 18 �n_a� 19 m -as. . s .. f E. Irurement. subject to the t,tstrictions against transfer or assignment as herein containnid, the ' provisions or this Agreement° shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the assigns, successors in interest, personal representatives, estates, heirs, and legatees of each of the parties hereto. i F. Amendment. This Agreement may only be amen- led by the written!aonsent of all of the parties to this Agreement at the time of such amendment-. G. Binding Effect. Except as prra'r,ded herein to the contrary, this agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their respective legal representatives, successors and assigns. 9 i A. Further Executioc) of Documents. The parties hereto agree to execute and file and to join in the 'execu- tion and filing of any and all agreements, consents or other documents reasonably necessary to effect the consummation of the transaction contemplated hereby, as either party hereto may reasonably require. + I. Attorneys' Fees. Should anv litigation or arbitration be commenced between the parties hereto or their representatives or should any party institute any proceeding in a bankruptcy or similar court which has jurisdiction over any other party hereto or ary or all of his property or its property or assets, which litigation concerns any ,provisions i of this Agreement, or the rights and duties of a-ly person or 19 m -as. . s klm' entity in relation t"reto Or to interpret any provision hereof, a party .or Pa'rties prevailing in such litigation shall be entitled, in addition to such other relief as may be qranted, to a reasonable sum as and for its or their attorneys' fees and catirt costs incurred in such litigation, which shall be determined by the court, in Mucb litigation or in a separate action brought for %:at purpose, should the same be necessary. J. Courterpvrts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original, but all of Which together will constitute one and the same agreement. X. Section and Other Headings. The section and lob, other headings contained in this Agreement are for reference Purposes only and will not affect the interpretation or meaning Of this Agreement. L. Miscellaneous. The agreements contained herein shall not be construed in favor of or against either party but shall be construed as if all parties prepared this- agreement. The masculine and neuter genders, the singular number and the present tense shall be deemed to include the feminine gender, the plural number, and past and future tenses, respectively, where the context so requires. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the parties and shall be effective on the day and year first d a* above written regardless of the date of a0tual execution hereof. 'CITY° CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Mayor BY: .x City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FQRMC Citg,Attorney PROPERTY OWNERS: PHILLIP D. SCHLOSSER Aalress: I EL;gNE M. SCHL'OSSER Address: ALBERT HOLGUIN, JR. Address: r ROBE'RTA J. HOLGUIN Address• I, JEFFREY P. SCHLOSSER Address: JACQUELINE L. SCHLOSSER i Address: i DAVID M. RICHARDSON Address: JEAN M. RICHARDSON Address: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) )ss. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO On , 198 , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and £or said County, ,personally appeared PHILLIP D. SCHLOSSER, ELAINE M. SCHLOV;ER, ALBERT HOLGUIN, JR., ROBERTA J. HOLGUIN, JEFFREY P. SCHLOSSER, JACQUELINE L.- SCHLOSSER, DAVID M. RICHARDSON, JEAN M. RICHARDSON, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persons whose names are subscribed to this instrument, and acknowledged to me that they executed it. Notary Public (SEAL) STAT'.4 OF CALIFORNIA )ss. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) � On , 158, bei°ore lie, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and Eor said County, personally appeared 22 i and ,.proved to me on the y basis, of satisfactory evidence to be the per;gens who execu- ted t�is instr%:ment as 'Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of, tht! City of Rancho Cxcamonga', a,,3iiu- 7icipal corporation existing and orgat:4zed under the laws of the State of Califia, and acknowledged ;' o me that the City of Rancho Cucamotl'ia exacuted it. ` Votary Public" (SEAL) 4 'AWL §n 4 g a DEVAC:R 23 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page �c Z. Recitals...... ...... ..... ......,... 1 . ........ .. 2.. Definitions...... ... .a. .-..... ......,... >.,.. 4 3. Description of Real Property ......................... 4 ..... 4. Interest of Progerty Owners.. ............................ 4 5. Binding Effect of Atioement . 5 ............................... 6. Relationshi 2 of Parties... .. ..... .................a.... 5 7. Purpose of Aareemer[t...... ....Y,.... ... ... .. ... ...... 5 8. Applicable General Plan:and Zone Designati n......r:'....... Gj;' i 9. Term of Agreement.`, ........w ,� ......... ..... .. ., .. 6 .... , ' 10. Time and Rate of Construction.:. ......................... 7 .il. Effect of Transfer of Real Property to Another Jurisdiction. 9 >. 12. Specific Restrictions and Entitlements on Development of Gthe Real PropertVa ....... .... ... ... .. J 13. Hold Harmless. ..._.a. ............... 14. Effect of Development Agredment4 on Land Use` Regulations.... 1� 15. Amendment or Ca=Alation of A reement 12 ..................... 16. Enforcement. 17. Event of Default .............. ...Y........,.......,.........' 14 18. Procedure Upon Default ! . Y .... ................I.............. 14 14. Cumulative Remedies........ ..... .................. �, 15 20. Recordation ............. .........a................... .... 16 21. Rights of Lender.. 16 22. Environmental Impact Report . ............................... 17 I 23. General ..................... I.............................. 17 J ` DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THIS, AGREEMENT Is entered into this day of ,;,1986, by and between PHILLIP D. SCHLOSSER AND ELAINE M. SCHL05SER, husband and wife, as community proper- ty, ALBERT- W. HOLGUIN, JR. AT: :) ROBERTA J. HOLGUIN, husband and wife, as community property, JEFFREY P. SCHLOSSER AND JACQUELIttE L, SCHLUSfpERr husband and wife, as community property, and pAVID M. RICHARDSON AND JEAN M. RICHARDSON, husband and wife, as community property ( "Property gFners ") and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Calikornia ( "City "). 1. Recitals. A. Government Code sections 65864 - 65895.5 auth- orize the City to enter into binding developri ht agreements with persons having legal or equitable z,nteres in real property for, the development of such propert B. The parties collectively described herein as Property Owners are the owners in fee simple absolute of approximately twenty -seven and seven- tenths (27.7) acres of real property, more or less, bounded by Rochester Avenue on the east and Arrow Route c.a the north, located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, more sp,�aifically described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (here- inafter referred to as the "Real Property "). As of the 1 r1n -3a- ti rt date hereof, t Property Owners have constructed on the real ' property four (4) buildings 'ccmtaining approximately one hundred thirty thousand (130,000) square feet. The improved portion of the Real P.ipecty, however, currently only occu- pies approximately seven and seven= - tenths (7,7) acres. ` There are approximately twenty (20) gross"' .acres of devell:►p- able but unimproved real Property remaining in the R?Ial Property. Property Owners hake developed a concel ?tual master plan for the Real Pro>_�srty° showing possible improve- ments to be constructed over the next five (5) 5 years and over the following fifteen (15) to twenty -five (25) 'years. ` These conceptual plans are attached hereto, marked Exhib.,,ts "R" and "C" respectively, and incorporated herein by refer,- ence. i. ebe conceptual plans are attached for illustrativ6 t h purposes only; final improvement plans and final site plans must be approved by the City using the criteria established herein. At final buildout, it is contemplated by Property f Owners that the Real Property could contain at least eleven (11) buildings, having a total gross square footage of betwa_r: four hundred thousand (400,000) to five hundred thousand (500,000) square feet; all such development is subject to applicable standards. L. The Real Property is currently being used for heavy industrial mantiLac wring. The Real Property currently has a designation under the Rahr_ho Cucamonga Industrial Area Specific Plan (hereinafter "IASPI) of Minimum Impact /Heavy M -33 0 Industrial. Allowable activities within the 14inimum Impact/Heavy InduL_C`rial area include manufacturing, proces- sing, fabriyation, warehousing, storage and freight b-�ndling. Use;s typical of those allowed within the area are forge shops, sri-eel milling faciliti,�S, plastic plants, , steel fabrication and metal fabricating facilities, woodworking facilities, machine shops and chemical storage and distribu- tion. The Real Property further falls within Subarea 9 in the IASP. As such, the Real Property is subject to a one hundred (100) foot rigbt-of-way (fifty (50) feet from center line) for bo#j.x_,Aochester Avenue and Arrow Route, and a forty-five (45) foot landscaping requirement (measured from ultimate face of curb, for both streets). D. The manufacturing uses currently conducted an the property result in some noise and vibrations and other impacts on the Real Property. It is not anticipated that these impact-; will lessen in the future or with additional construction on the Real Property and may, in fact, inctease. upe:ations currently conducte on the Real Property shall not violate applicable ore:nances and performance standards, however. E. Property Owners have requestekl� the City to enter into a -'s-velopment agreement and prnceedings have Jeen taken iz, accord-nce with City's rules and regulations. F. The City has found that this proposed Development Agreemp . is consistent with the General ;?Ian, the IASP and 3 M-sq 2, LA r{ ;, ?< the goals 4tnd objectives of each. G. On , 1986, City adopted Ordinance No. approving the Development Agreeroen;c with the Property Owners and the ordinance thereaxter took effect on 1986. 2. Definitions. In this Agreement, unleps the context otherwise requires, the following terms shall have the following meaning: A. "City" is the City of Rancho Cucamonga. - - B. " Pr.,jsct" is the development cGZSisting of building and improvements which may be cC.cstructed by Property Owners on the Real Property, described further in �- paragraph 8 below. C. "Property Owner$!' are PHILLIP D. SCHLOSSER, " ELAINE M. SCHLOSSER, ALBERT W. HOLGUIN, JR., ROBERT J. HOLGUIN, JEFFREY P. SCHLOSSER, JACQUELINE L. SCHLOSSER, 4 -- DA17ID M. RICHARDSON, JEA14 M. RICHARDSON, and inclines all a.,f ` their heirs, successors, administrators, personal repre- sentatives, successors in interest and assigns. r D. "Real Property" is the real, property referred � to in paragraph 1C above. 3. Description of Real Property.. The Real Property which iu the subject of this Agreement is described more fully in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 4. Interest of Property Owners.. Property Owners rep 4 -35 E resent that they have full �`egal title to the Real Property, . that they havo full legaZ,7�right to enter into this Agreement and to the best of their knowledge that there is no person or entity which has any other interest,,in fee ownership to the Real Property; Property Owners further represent that all other persons and entities who may hold legal or equit- able interest in the Property agree to be and are bound by this,, Agreeme4tt. If there e e any holders of deeds of trust on the Real Property which may be senior to 'the lien of this Development Agreement the holders of such deeds of trust have assented to the terms of this Development Agreement in writing and agree to be bound by , «e provisions hereof. 5. Bindn4 Effect of Agreement. The burdens of this Agreemet ' shall, run with the Real 7roperty and shall bind, and the benefits of t". is Agreement shall inure to, the successors in interest and assigns of the parties to it. 6. Relationship_ of PaC,_es. It is understooc: that ' the contractual relati_;, strip b,- -tween the City and the Property Owners is such that the Property Owners are indep- endent contractors and are not the agents of City f: - -r any purpose whatsoever. 7. Pu_Pose of Agreement. The - purpose of this Agree- ment is cc guarantee the Property Own_rs that they will be able to develop, construct upon and build out improvements on the balance of the Real Property ccnsistent with the current Minimum Impact /Heavy Intlustrial use of the Real L12 5 1 ProFertY, and andom. the and entitlements current restrictions ents of the �. regulations the IASP vity including, but not limited to and of g thereof.. For this intended }hat neither this h purpose, it is 9reen,e hereof s.hc,;,;ld nt restrict the abilit � nor any Provision build out Y of Propert acrd develop the Y Owners to iollo�i ba=lance of the Real na the guidelines, specifics and Property IASP. tither, neither this requirementa cif the AgreemE: Prcvides any guarantee nor any Part tha ee to the City -re,l of the unimproved portion o Y of any future development or, f the Real Property. S' A "licabl C, of P lan Zone JD IASP designation `or the and esi nation, The rmPact x3 Real Property is / eavy Industrial inimum al established b Y the IySp adopted by the City Council of CiIY on August Provisions c_ the TASp A11 • as amended, of the hereof are incorporated ' n effec� herein by `' as of the date set forth in fi=ll_ Y this reference as The allawaE,le though, tia uses, derslo n ns and ,performance F�ent restrir_- ' criteria and st With--n said 2 aadards for ASP and specifically S',nare d�veicoment incorporated herein by this a 9 thereof are full sections of reference as though set forth in , specific entitlements the iASp and Of Subarea are -egu2r `nts and and incorporated into attached as exhibit .,L'� hereta this Del -elopmen Agreement b this 9. T =ry _o_f Agr�Qm` The shall commence on the "erm of this date hereof, regardless gar:.less of the da.e of 6 M -37 actual execution nereof, and shall continue for twenty-five (25) years and maybe extended by City and Property Owners thereafter. ff 1 10. Time and Rate of Construction., The City may im- pose no time - 'limit on Property Owners' ability to construct improvements on the Real Property, nor may the City impose any type of restription on. the Real Property or the, ,,roperty Ow.iers as to the 'rote of 00- astruction on the Real Property (whether to 1=.mit the number of square feat built per year, number of fire hydrants available to the Ileal Prtper: -y, or any other similar or dissimilar type of "estriction). At ] any time in the future 35 Property Owr,zs may seek a.Vproval to construct additional improvements the Real Property, except: es prof ided hereir, City sh4 gxace no restrictions as rso rate of development, t;�e number of squire feet which may be built or occupied in any perioe. or calendar year or any other lima; rations whatsoever on the Property Owners' ability to c,_ .5t- riot k'_s improvements. Notwithstanding the j generality of the f:cre3oing, the City may require Property Owners tc, comply with all of the rules, regulation's, ordin- ances and code& uurrently Ppplieable in the 1-ASP or SubaK,a,a 9 thereof. Qhe City may lso requite comp''.ianct• with pro - t L-e?anal guidelines avid requirements, providing only that suc. ' 9 i^elines and requirements do taot violate the le,- >pirit of this Agreement. The City may s` not impose a.,a al building restrictions or spersial fees * Y- or assessn.gntis as a condition to approval of developmc.it on �,� the Real Property, which are di fferep.t than chose imposed on, s� development or construction of heavy, industrial improve,nentr" 4 :r similarly situated in, the City. � y. However, the City ma impok.c: such fees and assessments an applications for development approvals'on the Real Property and such fees and p. a assessments for per:0,ts and as conditions to'approval, as are applied to all minimum impact heavy i.nduatrial property c:;ty -wide. In the event i:hat Property Owners request ' .aK 'anal of plans to construct irr,prover. -,eats or, the Real Pro ert I , City sh� ail prompt y ?roces� t�(5 e same without " - unreasonable delay. SAch puns mall be Fevaeweci by the City in accordance with standards and raquire nerts currently :p al,p'Acable to the current zoning and IA�D.�ssignaticn for � the :Leal Property, as is more fully described in paragraph 9 i above„ If the plans for the futurz i npisovcment,s proposers to be constructed by Property Owners are vonaistent with the rules and. - standards now in effect relating to fie const.uc- Lion of improvements in Subs. - a '9 (Minimum Impact/ Aea,7- Industrial) of the IASP of the City, such plans sltall be approved by they City in such form as it normally provides for like approvals. Notwithstanding the generality of the foregoing, the City shall not be required to eilow such development and/or construct'on in the following cyreum- stancces.- A. If Property owr_ars had failed or refused to 8 rat -3 t comply with" condition of approval imposed by the City consi -s+ ent with the provisions of the :;-Trent;:- .zoning a-, Ad IASP designation to a previoLTs or contemporaneous applica- tion or permit issued or conditionally issued ,v Property Owners, City would not be required to make additional approvals until Property Owners had complied +;pith such conditions; a' B. In the event that City imposes an area- wi&f_ moratorium affecting all industrial property, the City woL7A not be required to issue permits or approvals until s,;ch moratorium had been lifted or terminated, - C, Where the City is under so =- form of 1 gal restriction. (as where tbitd perslins or entities have legally P rohibited City from issuing vely meat a pprovals = €oL similar project.a) from issuing- permits to Property Owners, the City shall use its best efforts to lift such rest7i.ction to enable PrtCarty Owna rs to exercise their rights under ' this Agreement but shall be under no obligation to finalize approvals until such Third party restriction has been lifted; and D. The City could have no legal obligation to issue additional approvals or pe;zmits if Property Owners were in default under this Agreement, until the default of Property Owners had been remedied or eliminated. 11. Effect of Transfer cf Real Property to Another Jurisdiction. If all or any portion of the Real Property ? 9 subject. of this 'Agreement is annexed to or otherwise becomes part of another city, this Agre;7tment shall terminate forthwith. 12. Specifio Restri-tions and 'Entitlements on Develo2- ment of the Real Pro_ ep rty, in a�jdi =ion to the IASP and zoning classification described abpiie, the specific restric- tions, performance criteria and entitlements of Subarea 9 of the IASP, 'set forth at length in Exhibit "D" hereto, shall, together with other applicable Codes and requirements, govern and control the City's requirements for development and construction on the Real Property for height and parking restrictions, building site coverage, k±uildi.ng setbacks, site Landscaping, noise levels and so forth. The following shall also control the use and future development of the Real PrcpertyE A. Permitted uses on or of the Real Property shall be any permitted or conditionally permitted use which may currently be made on real property located in the IASP and designated Minimum Tticpact /Heavy Industrial in the City, as set forth more specifically in Table III -1 of Exhibit "D" hereto. B. She City may not require indirectly (whether by way of fee, in lieu contribution or otherwise) Auctions or compliance on the part of Property Owners other than as specifically set forth in this Agreement. Notwithstanding the generality of the foregoing, the City may require 10 MA1 p payment or` normal and usual processing, filing and permit { 1 fees. The City may also require q normal, customary and usual i exactions Ear pu,,iic improvements and payment of such fees $ t and assessments which may be levied or assessed against the Real Proper' y and adjacent cr contiguous properties (such as 1911 Act assessment district assessments, parkway and street light maintenance district assessments). 13. Hold Harmless. Property Owners agree to and shall hold City, : -its csf£ .cers, agents, employees and representa- tives, harmless from liability for damage or claims £ur I,. damage fct personal injury including death and claims for r- proPeety damage which may aril_ from the direct or indirect operation of Property Owners or those of the %r contractors, aft subcontractors, agents, employees or any other person or p, entity acting on their behalf which would relate to the Real Property, the operation of improvements currently thereon, or the construction of any future .mprovcments thereon. Property Owner agrees to and shall defend City and its officers, agents, employees and representatives from actions for damages to third persons or entities caused by or alleged to have been caused by reason of Property Owners' activities in co'.1nection with this De •7elopment Agreement or with the Real Property. This hold harmless provision .. -plies to all damages and alaims for damage suffered oe alleged to have been suffered by reason o¢ the operations referred to in this Devel ^nment Agreement, regardless of 11, 1 no whethet or n*ot the Cizy prepared, supplied or approved the plans, spectficat7 xot.s or other documents for the Project. 4 14', Ef feat of Development reeme"i, on Land Use Regul- ations. The rules, regulations and official policies gover- ning- permitted us-as and development of che Rz:al Proper ty during the term of this Agreement, dcns�.ty and intensity of development on the Real Property, and design and impr6ver.ent standards and spc.cifications applicable to construction of improvements on the Re� al Property during the term of this Agreer_(:�nt, are those rules, regulations, official policies and standard-- in',force at the ti'me of thfi3Agreement andnot as the aam�, mry be c4�znged, modified or supplemented from time to time in the future. S-Fandards iml5ose�' on actual construction of improvements (thr- Uniform Building Code) and V rzviews and standards imposed by third persons and entities (SCAQMD, Cucamonga County Water District, and so forth) shall be thos.e which are imposed i�-t the time of approval. of any development request for all or any poriion of the Real Property. 15. Amendment or Cancellation of Agreement. This Agree- ment may be amended or cancelled in whuLe or in part only by mutual written consent of the parties and then in the manner provided for in Governnei,4 Code sections 65868, et seq. 16. Rnf orcemc-nt. Unless amended or cancelled as pro- v.ded in, this Agreemen', this Development Agreement is enforceable by any party hereto nothwithstanding a change ia 12 rY�A_3 T $' the IASP, or any General or Specific Plan, or any Epplicable F x` zoning standards or regulations adopted by the City which r` { after or amend the rules, regulations or policies currently governing permitted uses of tie Real Property, or density, =`•" design and /or improvement standards and 'specifications f therefor. In the event of a default under the provisions ° of • this Agreement by property Owners, City may given written °?a notice to the Property p Y Owners by personal service on the representative thereof (or his or her successor) at the address set forth below, or by registered or certified mail, " addressed to Property Owners at the address stated in this Agreement, „or to such other addresses as may have been designated by Property Owners. If such violation is not corrected to the reasonable satisfaction of the City wit ?Yin thirty (30) days after to date such notice is given, City may, on thirty (30) days written notice, declare a defeul.t E under this Agreement and, u, ?on any such declara•:. o:n of ' default and after providing any required time to Pure or to begin to effect a cure, the City may bring any ac;On neces- sary to enforce the obligations of Proneity Owr_er:, arising Out of the operation of this Development Agreement. Upon written notice to City and provision of a thirty .(30) day Period to cure or begin to effert a cure, Property Owners may declare 3 default under this Agreement. Upon any su,::h declaration, of default by City or Property Owners, the party giving t.ne declaration may bring' any action necessary to a{ E. 13 -Y\-4 j ( ei enforce the obligations to the other party arising out of the operation of thi, - Development Agreement- apply to any court, state or federal, for specific performance of the provisions of this Development Agreement or for ai, injunc- t�on against any violation 1-7 the other party of any prQvi- sions hereof, or for any such other relief as may be appro- priate. It is agreed by both parties that the injury to the non- breachi- g party arising out of a default under any of the terms of this Development Agreement would be irreparable and that it would be extremely difficult to ascertain the amount of compensatib?: %to the non- breaching party to afford adequate relief in light of the purposes and policies advanced and satisfi61,1 by the approval of the eventual, right V Of Property Owners to build out the Real ioperty, to house their business thereon,!, and by this Development Agreement. 17. Event.of Default. Ethe, party shall be in default under this Agreement upon the happening of one or more of the following events or conditions: A. Breach by either party of any of the provi- .aiors or term= of this Agreement, after notice and an opportitnity to cure has been provided, if no acts to cure the breach or default are commenced within the time period- afte, service of the notics of default on the other party and therea ter diligently continued to completion. 18. Procedure Upon Default. A. Upon he occurrence of an event of default 0 Y14 b c. f �+ •?hich has gone urremedied, the non - breaching /party, at its .a election, may terminate this Agreement. h. B. The non - breaching party does not waiv; ;-any claim of defect in the performance by the breaching party,,of =LL the te� ms and provisions of this Agreement if the non_ breaching party does not propose to modify or terminate this Agreement. C. lion- performance shall not be excused becauue of the failure of any third person or entity. F D. An express repudiation, refusal or renuncia- tion of this Agreement, if the same is in writing and signed f by the P,operty Owners, sht.il be sufficient to terminate this Agreement and`a hearing on the matter shall not be t required. E. All other remedies at law or in equity which are not othltrwise provided in thie Ajpreement or in the regulations of City governing development agreements gener- ally are available. to the parties hereto in the event that there is a breach of this Development Agreement. 19. Cumulative Remedies. The respective rights and remedies provided by this DevelopmEnt Agreement or by law or available in equity shall he cum active, and the exercise of any one or more of such rights of remedies shall not pre- clude or affect the exercise, at the same or at different times, of any other such rights or remedies for the same or different defaults or beaches or for the sme or different � 15 rn --`'Y 16 i y �...r� F G _ failures to per.:orm °' or •.',)serve any term or provision of this Agreement. 20. Recordation This s fig »eeml:i:t shall, at the expense of the Property Owner4,ve recorded in the Official Records of the County of San Bernardino in accordance -ith provi- sions of the Government Cc ?e, and a copy of the recorded E .. i` L 'strument delivered to City by Property Owners. Y ' 21. Aia� hts of Lender.. Should Property Ownersl' ircur any encumbrance on the Re ;1 Property, the lender having such encumbrance shall have the right at any time during the term of this Agreement and the existence of`.',siid encumbrance to: A. Do ar. y act or thing required of property '# F Owners under this Agreement, and by such act or thing done €<_ and performed by lea er :shall be as effective as if done by Property Owners themselves. x B. Realize on the security afforded by the encumbrance by exercising foreclosure proceedings Dr power of sale or other reigedy afforded in law or in equity or by r the security �nsrrument ( "tr ust deed ") in tha event of default thereunder and to; (i) Transfer, cor;vey or assign the title of Prop -:rty Owners to any pu.rcirasel, in any foreclosure sale,- whether the foreclosure sale be conducted pursuant to court order or pursuant to a pof.er of sale contained in the trust deed; (ii) Acquire and succeed to the interest 16 i of Property Oriners by virtue of any foreclosure sale, whether the foreclosure sale be cond;icted pursuant, to a`" court order or pursuant to a pc+wer of sale c.sntained in the trust deed. rt,re ^losing lenders or V,;rchasers at foreel. -o.are sales of any kind shall.be considered to be successors in inte*est of Property Owners for all purposes under this Agreement 22. Environmental impact Report. Property Owners acknowledge that, under current City ordinances and regula- tions, further development on the Real Property might be subject to an environmental impact analysis and, preparation . of an environmental impact report. in this iegard, it is the express intention of the parties to preserve, as much as is legally possible, the ability for Property Owners to build out and improve the balance of the Real Property comsistert with current ordinances and regulationo irrespec- tive oa land use changes which may occur in other areas and on other contiguous or proximate properties, 23. General. A. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes all agreements, representations, warranties, statements, promi- ses and /or understandings, whether oral or written, with respect to the subject matter hereof: and no party shall be bound by any such representation, statement, promise or understanding not Fpecifically set forth in this Agreement. 17 M '-'a A rrw � 18 p B. 27otice. All Notices under this hgreement shall be in writing and shall be delivered ay personal service, or by certified or registered mail, postage pre- Paid, return reOipt requ4sted, to the parties. Any written notice to a,.y rf the jarties required or permitted hereunder shall be dr_emed to have been duly given on the ;date of service if served personally or :seventy -two (72) hours after : e mailing. Rejection or other refusal to acceik inability to deliver because of changed address of which no notice was given as provided hereunder shall, be deemed to be recef pt of the notice, demand or request sent. ` Notices to the parties shall be addresse -i 3� set forth at !Fhe conclu- sion of thin Agreement. By giving tae other pai;ity at least thirty (30) O;zl s written +not ,ce thereof, the parties hereto r. shall have the right from time to time or at any time during the term hereof tc chance their respective addresses for notice. C. Seve_abilitY. In the eaent ...at any of the -p-ovisions, or portions thereof, of this Agreement are held to be unenforceaL a or invalid by any court: of competent Jurisdiction, the validity and enforceability of the remaining p:ovisions, or portions thereof, shall not be affected thereby. D. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be con - strued and governed in accordance with the laws o� the State of California now in effect. 18 p E. lnurem ��. Subject to the restrictions against transfer or assignment as herein. c-7ntained, the prow -sions of this Agreement shall inure to the be-v,,ef it of and be binding upon the assigns, successors in interest, personal representatives, estatea, heirs, and legatees of each of the parties hereto. F. Amendment. Thi-- Agreement may only be amen- ded by the wzitten consent of all of the parties to this Agreement at the time of such amendment. G. Binding Effect. Except as provided herein to the contrary, this agreement shall be binding upon and inure to t::,ke benefit of the parties heretof their ;espective.legal representatives, successors and assigns. H. Further Execution of Documents. The parties hereto agree to execute and file and to join in the execr- tion and filing of any k.ild 11 agreement*, consents or other de-,--aents reasonably necessary to effect the consummation of the transaction contemplated hereby, as either party bexeto may reasonably require. 1. Attorneys' Fees. Should Any litigation or .ion be commenced between tht partles hereto or their representatives or should any party institute any proceeding in -,.. bankruptcy or similar court which has -1.,-'risdicti on over any other party hereto or any or all of his propel.ty or its property or assets, which litigati-,^n concerz any provisions of this agreement, or the rights and duties of any person or 14 provision i ir�:arPret ani p ation °r t° such '�t�g f in vela =ian thereto prevailing in ief as mY entity arty or partle -e to -;uch other tits or their �. here shall. be entitled` 3.n ao� ble'sum as any °such Iitigat-an. red on t� e qt anted to a reCOUrt cots incur in such litigati the G` b I fees and a court attorneys be determined by the tha• purp4Se► sh,oul which shall ara action br ®ught for ecuted to ac - be ex may in a sep This Agreement l be deemed an �cessary• ch of hich w i1 d be n` arts. same 3• counter -a `� sti*ute one an an or ounterwh Y► rto9ether will �On and e m °re c in l b"t all of The section origins a agreement- 8e ,a. for referen�'e agre t• d er ad �.- 0th se are the same Vt. $eCt1Pned in this A9re tinterpreta'tion or Gontai � ,.h headings not ffec „ other n q and will a eats oontained ourp °$es s Agreement Tine agrsem 5t either Of this aneoas. or again meaning t . A' scr 1, in favor °f repared this be construed all parties p singular all no as if the herein bu a shall be constr ee and neuter gendersdr dude the to in party The masculin shall be dee-- past and £,tare agreement' tense and p d tit Present ,i number r tuber an a p],ura M so require' nu minlne genderI th where the context heen executed b t fe velY, Agreement has Qnd Year firs ecti $es, reSp off' thss v.e the day ten WBE an l�.tyesEan shays be" effecti the pal, r'. r � I. w IFS L above Written regardless of the date of wntaal execution hereof. CITY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAImv A � B.Y Mayor BY: City Clerk o APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney PROPERTY OWNERS: ' PHILLIP D4 SCHLOSSER, ' Address: ELAINE. M. S,CHLOSSER Address: ALBERT HOLGUI.J, JR. Address: ROBERTA J. HOLGi3IPi I Address: OIL :I r /y21 n JEFFREY P. SCHLOSSER Address: JACQUELINE L. SCHLOSSER Address: DAVID M. RICHARDSON Address: JEAN M. RICHARDSON Add,. tom: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO IsS. On , 198_, before rte, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County, personally appeared PHILLIP D. SCHLOSSER, ELAINE M. SCHLOSSER, Ai BERT HOLGUIN, JR., ROBERTA J. HOLGUIN, JEFFREY P. SCHLOSSER, JACQUELINE L'. SCHLOSSER, DAVID M.I�ICHARDSONr JEAN M. RICHARDSON, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persons whose names are subscribed to this instrument, and acknowledged to me that they executed it. Notary Public ( SEAL' STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) )ss. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) On , 1.98 , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County, personally appeared 22 5 and , proved to me on the basis of satisfactory e- vidence to be the porsons who execu- ted this instrument A Maycr and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation existing and organilzed under the laws of the State of ,Ye California, and acknowledged to me that the City of Rancho Cucamonga executed it. Notary Public _ (SEAL) g:DEVAGR 0 � i ExrT BIT "A" -- (Legal Descrintion) Parcel 1; Lots 25 and 26, Town of Rochester, as per Plat recorded in Book 9 o Maps,, P09p 20, Official Records of San Bernardino County, EXCEPTING THEREFROM, the west 438.66 feet thereof. Parcvl 2: The wes'z 438.66 feet of Lots 25 and 26 of ,, tochester, as per Plat recorded in book 4 of Maps, Page 20`;-official Re,:ords of San Bernardino County, EXCEPTING,':THEREPROH, �Le west 50 feet of said Lot 25, Parcel 3; Lot 27, according to Map of Rochester, as per Plat recorded in Book 9 of Daps, Page 2r- Official Records of San Bernardino County, Cali ozi- a. 0 k p 1'. iii i�► t) 1 1 ' 0 1 1 1 $ Ir 1 1 � 1 ----------------- IS 4:0 V:� a 1 lion � 1 1 t 1 t l` SCALE; 111=200, EXHIBIT "B" 5 A-11711-024A 4- 17 -86 PROPERTY PLAN t MATURE y n „y a� C f ( f i.'�. _ .._.�. .�....o. -..w�e �._- �., -�.- ,...ems � - -o_.. .___....- .�- �.,�_',flf•`— �'-- _. -.y.. � ifs f , , � f 1 I a ire e � , f SCALE; 1” -200' EXHIBIT "C" M-:5-1 a A- 11711 -025A 4- 1'7 -86 k EXHIBIT "l?" 11 -3 YY1- SS' LAND USE PLAN Use of the industrial lands is organized to provide a broad ,range of industrial development opportuni- ties ranging from light /industrial type of :accommo- dations to sites for heavy, rail - served industrial plants. Based on consideration of road and rail access, the relationship to surrounding nun-indus- trial uses, City -wide plan policies and the parcel- ization` pattern, land within the Industrial Area is q assigned to major land use categories: Industrial Park - General Industrial - General Industrial /Rail- Served l '.l Heavy Industrial /Rall- Served j .'° ',be definitions of the four industrial land use catngories follows In Table I1-1, and the dis - sr tribution of these uses are shown in Figure 11-1 �a .. Lard Use Plan - A more detailed definition of permitted and conditionally permitted uses is - listed in Part ill. 1 EXHIBIT "l?" 11 -3 YY1- SS' TABLE 1i -1 INDUSTRIAL LAND USE CATEGORIES INDUSTRIAL PARKxGROUP. land is reserved for industrial firms seeking an attract;ve and pleasant working environment and a location which has prestige'value.. Approximately 1238 acres have been allocated to this use, or 26Z of the total Industrial Park group designation permit light industrial uses, office and administration facilities, research and development Taboratories, limited types of warehousing, as well as support businesses and commercial service uses. The industrial Park areas are characterized by a high employment density, The development and design standards are developed to protect lands in this use group from development which is inappr6priate due to either function, appear- anca or environncental affects. GENERAL INDUSTRIAL GROUF. This group o7ovides for the widest possible range of light and medium industrial typo 'CZJvity, including manufactur- ing, assembling, fabrication, wholesaling, heavy commercial' I ,office, uses; Totaling approximately 1570 acres, or 33% of the lridusti J Area land. This land use category is appropriate as a buffer between non- industrial uses and heavy industrial uses. in these areas the appiicab'le development and design standards are less demanding than those of the industrial park _areas, but safeguards are provided to ensure a pleasant well - functioning environment. The required land area per parcel is also less demanding thao other industrial area.' so as to accommodate smaller firms. GENERAL INDUSTRIAL /RAIL - SERVED GROUP. Uses permitted in areas designated as general industrial /rail- served are similar to those in the general industrial Use group, Approximately 715 acres, or 15 %, are designated in this- use group in the Industrial Area. The major difference is the condition encouray'ing uses to be either rail- served or functionally. linked to a rail- served land by non -rail using activities. The develop- ment and design standards are also generally equivalent to those_ in the general industrial use group, but a larger parcel size standard is established to ensure sizes sufficient to accommodate rail using indus- trial uses. 11 -4 TABLE 11 -1 (Continuted) INDUSTRI,'% LAND USE CATEGORIES Gua IY � ys MINIMUM IMPACT HEAVY 1NDUSTNIAL GROUP. Approximately S37 acres or 11; Of land is reserved for minimum impact heavy industrial uses. The t development ste,ndards are designed-to provide for heavy industrial uses which ?gill not significantly impact on the surrounding area. Minimum Impact`Neuvy Industrial activities include manufacturing, compounding, processing, fabrication, warehousing, storage and freight handiingd Uses typical of this group include but are not 14nited to. forge shops, ;J steel milling facilities, plastic plants, steel fabrication, metal fabricating facilities, woodworking faci:iti.es, heavy matriina shops and chemical storage and distribution.. Not permitted within the area are uses which requit >i massive structures outside of buildings or unscreened open air storage of larger quantities of raw, semi- refined, or finished products. HEAVY IN60STRIAL GROUP. Approximately roximatel 675 acres or 15% of land east of Deve Freeway is reserved for Heavy industrial Uses. The development ; ste wards are designed to provide for all heavy industrial uses, Heavy' Incustrial activities include manufacturing, compound ?ng, processing, fabrication, warehousing, storage, and freight handling. Use charac v,k�r'sfics_` of this group would include large structure-, to facilitate processing -. and open air storage of large amount of raw or semi - refined products. Uses within this area typically include but are not limited to; I/ehicular assembly plants, power plants, concrete product manufactures and,batch plants. !t -5 MAJO nc _­ � - M1111 r C C a 4 CtRCULATLON Ai_ D ACCESS � : This section addresse-1 vehicular access and circular -. tion,.. transit, rail, an-1 -,, ' t inn and `aicycle routes, marking provisio'6,o' are discussed in Part ill under Parking Require�iAlpts. The plan for the trircu3ation system is shoW.i in Figure t[ -2 and des - cribed within this section. Traffic Analysis E Traffic Projections DKS A'�sociates prepared an initial Rancho Cucamonga City -jtide industrial and Area Traffic Study in 1980.` An additional analysis was conducted to Better reflect local access within the Indus-triai Area and to estimate peak period traffic volumes for detailed analysis. A description of the process utilized to develop the traffic model can be found in Appendix A. Significant observations made from the traffic model relative to the projected traffic volumes in the industrial Area are: a 4lighest ADT volumes are along Haven Averse and Foothill Boulevard. Haven Avenue volumes are on the order of 50- 60,000 vehicles par day, assuming sufficient capacity is pro- vided. o Total east/west traffic volumes acces- ing the Devore Freeway within the Industrial A,"a (4th Street and Foothill Boulevard) are projected to be high. This is only partially.offset by Eli the assumed presence of additional interchange at 7th Strtaet. - o The projected east/west traffic count on Foothill Boulevard is projected to 45,000 ADT at Haven Avenue which is at capacity. o ADT volumes on 6th and 7th streets are in- creased subs.antiaily due to the assumption of a 7th Street /Devore Freeway interchange in the General Plan Update Program. However, volumes are not unreasonahly high relative to capaci- ties available. i l -6. it -11 � a YY1 o About 20,000 vehicles Fier day in the.liaven• Mfi }fken corridor are associated with the Ontario Motor Speedway commercial deiI�.elop- ment assumptions.. If the Speedwa?yy were to remain or be developed with lowe?-'trilffic generating uses, Haven and Milliken Avenue volumes would be reduced accordingly, Figure 11 -3 shows the results of 'the volume projec- tions. Level of Service Adequate capacity on existing and planned, Ti;NNOways is needed to ensure efficient traffic flgws a'nd an acceptable level of service on streets in the in- dustrial area. Traffic volumes can be related to descriptions of traffl`c performance to determine the level of service available at an intersection. Table 11 -2 describes these performance levels. Midblock Roadway Capacity l` Midblock roadway capacities were determined for the major street segments in the Industrial Area. A description of the procedures used to deter-; ?ne midbiock capacities and volume -to- capacity ra tios for the street segments are.i'cluded within Appen- dix A. The streets within the Industrial Area pro - jected to potentially experience substantial over- loading are Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue. Heaviest volumes on Foothill Boulevard are project- ed toward the east near the Devore Freeway, . indicat- ing a significant freeway access problem. However, alternative Industrial Area freeway access routes- - 7th and 4th streets- -are to projected operate satis- factorily throughout the Industrial Area. In the north -south direction, Haven Avenue is substantially overloaded along its length. Relief for Haven Ave- nue will be discussed further in the next section. Vehicular Access and Circulation The roadway network in the Industrial Area Land: City) is laid out in a basic ene mile gridiron pattern. In the already developed portion of the Industrial Area (west of Haven) this gridiron system is further broken down to i/2 mile intervals. The proposed circulation system, as shown in Figure 11-2, follows this gridiron pattern to the smallest unit of roughly 1/8 mile (which would form a 10 acre` square grid), where smaller properties exist. Gen -, erally, a quarter -mile grid pattern has been adhered= to. it -11 � a YY1 - y "n Aft { �s _,..• 29000 25000 270W 33000' —L� 4000 .r 25 . 8800 22000 i. 21000 ,21000' c 25068 50�0 60000 5�0'0-0 40800 37000 yC:37000 27000 d�0 N.. 13000 10000 !f 4pV r� --Cp3 TABLE 11 -2; LEVELS OF HIGHWAY SERVICE INI'ER1,RETATION Level of Delay Range Volume to (Sec. Service Desc, r _lotion per Capacity Vehicle Ratio A Excellent operation. All approaches to 0 -16 0 -60 Percent signalized intersection appear quite open, turning movements.are easily made, and nearly all drivers find freedom of operation, No vehicles wait longer than ` one red traffic signal indication. B Very good operation, Many drivers begin to feel somewhat 16 -22 60 -70 Percent restricted within pla- ° toons of vehicles. This represents stable flow. An approach to a signal - ,. ized intersection may occasionally be fully utilized, and a substantial ^, Number of cycles are are approaching +, full use., C Good operation, Occasionally drivers 22 -28 70 -80 Percent may have to wait through more than one p,t red signal indication, and back -ups may develop behind turning vehicles. Most drivers feel somewhat restricted. This level is typically associated with urban k design practices. I' 3 D Fair operation. Cars are required to ?8 -35 80 -90 Percent wait through more than one traffic cycle a during short peaks. There are no long- •= standing traffic queues. E Pour operation. Some longstanding vehic- 35-40 99-100 Percent _ ular queues develop on critical approaches to intersections. Delays may be up to •— several signal cycles. F Forced flow. Represents jammed condi- 40 or Over 100 Percent ._ tions. Backups from locations down - stream or on the Gross street may -- restrict or prevent movement of vehic- les out of the intersection approach lanes; therefore, volumes are not predictable. Potential for stop and L go type traffic flow. Source; Based on National Academy of Sciences, Hiqhway Capacity Manual, 1965, and the Draft Final Report for update pr the manual. 11-13 M :, Roadway Cross- sections for roadway requirements were detEr Cross- Lections mined based oil midbiock roadway capacities, Major C' Arterials with 120 foot righ^ -rf -way in the Indus trial Area include: • North /south- roadways of Haven Avenue, Day Creek Boulevard, and Milliken Avenue r ^. • East /west roadways of Foothill Boulevard, 6th and 7th Streets between Haven Avenue and the'Dev�lre Freeway and 4th Street,` Major arterials with 100 foot rigt" :; -of -way include: o North /south roadways of Archibald Avenue and New Rochester, Etiwanda Avenue. 4 East/west roadway of Arrow Route. Secondary Arterials with 83 foot right -of -way clu?at o Vi ieyard Averf.e, Hellman Avenue, Cievelanij Avenue, and 6r1 Street west of Haven "_Aven(e. These streets will form the basic I/? mile grid system. The ocher streets, which will further divide the circulation network into 1/4 and 1/8 mile grids, will have rights -of -way ranging from 54 feet to 88 feet. Figure 11 -4 presents midbluck cross- sections of each street classification type with lane requirements. Roadway Network The following roadway mod'fic,2 -ions are recommended Modifications w.`.hin the industrial are a. o New Rochester. As discussed in toe City -wide �. and Industrial Area Traffic Study and incorp- orated in the Industrial Area Plan, Rochester Avenue from 4th Street to 8th Street should bit- n. relocated to the west. This i- needed to rro- vide adequate distance %r turning lanes be- tween the Rochester and Devore Freeway ramp intersections along 4th and (in the future) 7th Streets. Desirably, this new alignment should be carried north to the first collector .,. street beyond Foothill Boulevard, thereby providing a continuous, direct, north - south route to supplement Millilen Avenue, 'J. 11 -i1}t - - - _ VY\ rii RI • New Rochester (Continued). However, the AT &SF Railr+ay plans CO construct a railroad yard approseimately between er,isttng Rochester !u nue and future Mil l iker Avenue. To avolri` grad3e separating New Rochester over the rai >rnad Yard, the existing Rochester grade crossing should be retained. This would necessitate a tight reverse curve from New Rochester to ex >' isti:ng Rochester south of the AT &SF tracks. Attached with Appendix a is the suggested align- ment 4or New Rochester. • Day toeek Boulevard. This aIignment is part., >f the Victoria Community Plan and will es_tend southerly across Arrow Route and connect into Rochester Avenue north of the ATESF track%. • Cleveland Avenue. The need fnr additional ut north /soh roadway capacity I6irouch the Indus- trial Area is dependent upon future development i;avei in 'the Ontario Motor Speedway and in the aria bounded by Haven Avenue, Base line Road, Milliken Avenue and Arrow Route. At,�rojerted traffic levels, there appears to be`a oted:for an additional route from Foothill Boulevard to 1-10 to reduce traffic on Haven and Milliken Avenue and reduce overloads oil Foothill /Haven and Foothill /Milliken. To accomplish this, Cleveland Avenue should extend south of 4th Street and connect across the San Bernardino Freeway to a new south frontage road, Cleve lanf' Avenue would upgrade capacity sj4fficlently through Rancho Cucamonga's industrial Area, but much of that tr3fftc would still have to access ` the freeway at Haven or Milliken Avenue. Hence., this improvement, unless coupled with 1 -10 frbAR way access Improvements Sn Ontario, would move the traffic bottleneck far.'Ter south.. At a minimum, it would appear necessary to provide a grade- separated crossing of 1-10 at Cleveland Avenue and to tie Cle gland Avenue into a one• way frontage road system paralleling the freeway. Existing "G" Street in Ontario could be used as the north (westbound) frontage road. These im- provements should he considered in any redevel- opment of the Ontario Mo,:or Speedway and vicin- ity by the City of Ontario. FIG. 11-4 T LASS PI I ION OIL 1 f MAJOR I AM a CRIAL DIVIC)ED (1 2 0 ft. ROW) ® Foothill Haven • Milliken 4th c 3th between Haven & v Day Creek Blvd. MAJOR ARTERIAL r(100 ff. ROW) • Archibald • Arrow ® lev Rochester • Ei:iwanda* * South of Arrow substitute two -wav left turn lane for jnedian T • 6th last of Deore 4 Turner Jersey* *80' Right-of_r:q ALL LOCAL. INDUSTRIAL ( 4 f#. ROW) • 6th West of Rochester • Sth qth ® Center o Santa. Anita : (Old Rochester) `l o Baker- s Other Local Streets *66' Right -of -way rte- CeOF i Q= ONDAR Y (88 L ROW) a Vineyard _- J. • Hellman o Cleveland e 6th West of Haven a Turner o Jersey SECONDARY (74 ft. ROW) yr • 6th last of Deore 4 Turner Jersey* *80' Right-of_r:q ALL LOCAL. INDUSTRIAL ( 4 f#. ROW) • 6th West of Rochester • Sth qth ® Center o Santa. Anita : (Old Rochester) `l o Baker- s Other Local Streets *66' Right -of -way rte- CeOF i J_ 'Im-1-1- �T IV, a Sixth Screetj eqth.Stget. The need 7En Street to��th�_ pro,�, efficient ac pu'ed 'Interchange at Route Ii/Seventh Street, points to a strong continuity between Sixth and Seventh. The ose of intersectloms would require. dual right turn a� well as left turn lan�es which would involve long, complex traf- fie signal cycles. An alternativ(_ to usin,,.q two Intersections is a curvedt continuous can- nection as a means of going from Sixth��'Lr Seventh. There will be,� need for splitting the traffic wishing to go south ion Route 15 between the 4th Street: 1'nterchange and the 7r�h Stre:,. interchange. this is best accomplish,ed by eliminating as much delay and I_nconvenieifLe as possible from the trip along Srxth and north to Seventh. or a 8th Street, Portions of Bih Street carr be a- bandoned between Haven Avenue and Rochester Avenue if requird for rail service. a Milliken Avenue. The at-grade portion of the proposed Milliken Avenue e:_-,tens!an (4th Street to Foothill Boulevard) will be aligned to be compatible with,a future railroad grade sepa- ration, mainline and spur railroad service needs and possible utility corridors. Haven aml Milliken Railroad grade separations are proposed at Haven Separation Studies and Milliken Avenue!; and the AT&SF railway. The precise alignments for Haven and Milliken Avenues at the separation locations are shown on plans pre- pared by DKS Assocetes a,-d are included in Appen- dix C. These Olans aefine the additiona*l right-of- way needed to the adjacent parcels. Peak Period Peak period intersection volumes were utilized to Intersection Volumes determine the number of lanes needed for an inter- section to operate at Level of Service 110'1. The results are shown in Table 11-3. A further expla- nation of the "lume/Capacity Ratio V/C is given in Appendix A. left Yv.. Haven /Arrow RoaLa 1340 NEk;Wahes Haven /4th 3 �"'.r00 0.89 Dble. left turn lanes - -Na; WB 1470 .500 0.98 Dble, left turn lanes - -Wa; Sa Milliken / Foothill 1590 1500 1.06 0hle, left turn lanes - -NB; SB; EB MilTiken /Arrow Route' 1200 `1500 0,80 Dble, left turn lanes - -Na; 58; ES Milliken/4th 1500 ?` 1500 1.00 Rochester /Foothill 1444 f 1500 0.96 `Unless otherwise stated, all approaches are assumed to havo one left turn and one right turn lane in addition to mid -block through lanes. As Table 11 -3 indicates, the Foothill /Haven Inter- section is the most overloaded intersection in the City and is expected to operate substantially above caoacity. Foothill /Milliken is erpectea to overate aMdve capacity and Milliken/4th will op-.,ate just at capacity. A detailed presentation of all major intersection lanes and right =of -way requirements is presented in Figure 11 -5. Generally,' each intersection iveludes one separate left turn lane and as many through lanes as there are travel lanes upstream. At some intersections, double left turn lanes and /or a right turn lane may be necessa -y.. CIRCULATION AND ACCESS POLICIES ?olicies and Arterials In order to ensure the effectiveness and capacity of arterials, it will be necessary to establish and en14orce rigid access control policies. These controls are currently in effect under the pro- visions of the Planning- ',mmission Resolution 78 -29. • Non access to all arte, -iajs shall be dedicated to the 'ity wherever suitable alternative access may be developed from local or collec- tor streets. • Where access must be granted to an arterial, said access shah be limited to one point for 300 feet of frontage or one point per parcel with less than 300 feet of frontage, it is the intent of the policy to establish a mint; mum 300 foot snacirg between driveways. - 11 -19 _ r .s %ASLE 11-3 PROJECTED VOLUME /CAPACITY RATtOS- IM1,ERSECTIONS, AT LEVEL OF SERVICE "D''/ PM Pe- ak Hour - n—t-e- r—sec—tio— n P !1 ne Oc Raved /Foothill 1 it mG.11 -5 f DIREC"TiONAL LANE AND RO.W. REMUIREIMENTS AT INTERSECTii?RS ` 3 g `y. x FOGTH itt � � � ,,� 2 a 3 � BLVD. 2 -. nr ' ..:.. m 3 - <1 3 --� �i fi 3 2 3 1 1 a, i 2 1 2 3 1 n, 13itr ;ov' tsr' -- 2 y 4-- 2 ARROW t V ROUTE 2 F 17� 2 2 } 31 12 14 131 1 3 1 2 � 6T4 STREET 17:31 1 31 } 2 1 31 I 5q idol f I 7,'2 , 1 2 1 3 1 ,� j ti 3 3 �} 4--- 3 _ 4TH o I STREET "� q 3- 231 2 } 31 y t HAVEN CLEVELAND MILMEN Ir 77 r "IN DIRECTIONAL LANE AND FLOM/. REi UIREME �. �iT.� AT INTERSECTIONS a _ ROCHESTER 1 2 }-. } i FOOTHILL BLVD. } 21 8 $a € i ~ NEW ROCHESTER 1 - 15 2, } 12 } STREET ...�22 22 . " 6TH — i STREET 2 N j tQO' t -} 5 2 }} 4TH L STREET p 0 2 2 -'1` ra ? 2 2 "7 1001 t a Combined access to arterials between adjacent 04d properties shall be encouraged wherever possi- ble to reduce the number of encroachments. o Access points shall, wherever passible, be lo- cated a minimum of loo feet frinm the back of, "fb returns at intersections o1 4 lane or widt�r highways. , a Where otherwise compatible with this policy, access shall be located opposite existing or planned points on the opposite side of the street. a In addition to the controls outlined in Plan - ning Commit; ion Re ?olu tion 78 -29, several addi- tional restrlct;'_ans >will be necessary'. ^ Medianisland'fl;,eala and left turn _ access should be- limited to approxi- mately quarter mile spacings on the ' following major divided arterials: Haven Avenue, Foothill Boulevard, - Milliken Avenue, and Fourth Street. Figure 11-6 shows the recommended arterial intersection spacing which'- will provide adequate storage lengths for left turn lanes. ' ^ Signalized intersections should be spaced a minimum 1/4 mile apart to •� achieve adequate two -way progression. intersections can be spaced not less than 940 feet apart and still provide left -turn entry and exit lanes- on the arterials (except Haven, Foot- hill', Milliken, and 4th) as shown in Figure 11 -6. - For safety and efficiency, side fric- tion along major arterials should be minimized. Therefore, on-street park- ing should be eliminated, median ob- structions should be minimized, and left -turn movements and access to drl.b- ways should be confined to designated locations. ^ Along Haven End Milliken, additional access restrictions may be required Aft due to traffic volume constraints. a �I <y PART III DEVELOPME *,q T S a ANDARPS AND GUIDELINES M t. INTRnDUGTION 4� The development standards and guidlines for the Im• datitHal Area Specific Plan of Rancho Cucamonga # consist of threa components. )Land' Use Types 'Development Standards I Urban Design Standards and Guidelines The °purpose of this section Is to setup the specific' standards and guidelines which will lie used for the development in the Industrial area. Standards and guidelines are designed to be compatible with L-ke four major Land Use categcries. Variations of these standards are made depending upon a specific site conditions." These variations are applied through spgcial conditions within the sixteen subareas of the Industrial plan, as shown on Figure 111 -1. These tubareas reptisert specific Land Use charac- teristies and development constraints which can be best delt with on a subarea basis rather than through the application of broadly applied develop- ment standards. r � III-1 V-A -- _ X It. LANG USE TYPES` There `are 45 possible land use types within the 1n- rdustrial Plan area. Each subarea has a, pertain set of land use types based upan its land us,` €.,cabegory surrounding conditions. Tabl'.e IVI 11`ists the. land -use types by subarea. Definitions of these "land uses °are in Table 111 -2. Permitted Uses Permitted uses are those land uses allowed in a given subarea subject to.,the development 7egulakions of the-Plany-, Conditional permitted uses, �bNcause of their unustuaf•, site development requirements a unique opearkt -jng characteristics, are subject, granting of $ Conditional approval by the PS:t+n ng tommission. > ,� Conditional Uses Projects requiring a Conditional Use Permit shall be -rr require;,t to comply with the regulations of Section 61.0619 ) of the Zoning Ordinance. The Planning - -= - Commission shall matte the follwoing findings before granting a Conditional Use Permit: 1. That a proposed use is in accordance.with ' thc'�,General Plan, the Specifiq,Man, and the purpc ;as `of the Land Use category in which the project is located. , 2. That the proposed use, together with con- ditions applicable thereto„ will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use will comply with each I of the applicable provisions to the Specific Plan. TABLE 111.1 SUMMARY LAND USE TYPE BY SUBAREA • PERMITTED USE ❑ CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE USE TYPES SUBAREAS -- 3 4 5 & 1 6 0 1 1❑O 3 1Q 5 Custom _ . . . � • • O • O • ! i • O ® 0 e Lght : :. ♦ ® o • s • Medium C C ❑® ' • e • • • • Minimum Impact Heavy , : : ; , , � • Heave WHOLESALE STORAGE ©ISTIiI8U7I0 Lght , ..M.r;, . ; , ; , . _ : . � � . tza �oi.: . .: ,.'�f �. .;t . ♦ • • • • s • • e • o ❑�♦ • �® f1:r17• • COMMERCIAL Administrative arid Office . „ O .❑ a s ❑ 7Agricultural • � Supples and Services • ♦ • i ♦ ♦ ,♦ ♦ ,"r , 4 1 Animal Care � � x ,1u _ Ti; " Automotive Fleet Storage R ❑ 13 ❑ Automotive Rental ; ,a re � 4 ' p ;Y .P p ♦ R "j10 14.MANUFACTURING -1_Q ' Automotive /Lght Truck Repair - Minor • • n ❑ ❑ , • :J;i^ ° � ^ . Autornotive/Truck Repair --Major = : ; � a . � s r - � r ,�t? ; ♦ , - ♦e ' ' . u : ad � ' :• . w❑ , ' . 13 -E3 Automotive Sales Q . . L8 ZASy tl Si:rvi Automotive r ' b i a # t l 1 3 < i = _ r ^ . J i Q• � Building Contra office and Yards w ❑ . o • .; Building Contractor's Storage Yards i Building Maintenance Services i o a' ® e" ,� ` `'' • 'o • o " j Building Supplies and Sales �„;:; " r. • ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • ! ! o' • Business Supply Retail Sales and Services • a ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ :a Business Support Services ;;;:� r • ❑ e o • o ❑ ♦ o e • s s 13 13 • v, • • o • • OF ❑ e • Communication Setmces • • • • • e ❑ • Convenience Sales and Services ^ , s :w.i: '� ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ a • ❑ • ❑ e ❑ C e i Eating and Drinking Establishments e a e • 0 • • • ♦ o • • • ❑ ` Entertainment . z: ... ❑ ❑ .0. tY ❑ e • e ❑ j xttetnsivvee Impact Commercial M.., ,n c �_ ::❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Services ❑ ❑ ❑ c • 0 ❑ o " Food and Beverage Sales "` Y^ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ Funeral and Crematory Services ❑ ❑ Heavy Equipment Sales and Rentals ❑ ❑ ❑ ' ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Hotel /Motel "' • • ♦ Laundry Services • ♦ ❑ • e • • o Medical /Health Care Services - ❑ • o o = ❑ ♦ _ Personal Services ❑ J ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ _- ❑ • Petroleum Products Storage = - ❑ Professional Services ❑ - y Recreational Facilities - - • • ♦ e Repair Services e o • • ScraD O ration e o ❑❑ • o a o 0 . 0 0❑ CIVIC e Administrative Civic Services � a o 0 0 `Cultural o v o 0 0• Extensive Impact Utility Facilities ❑ u - - - - Public Assembly -_ -_ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Public Safety and Utility Services _ ❑ ❑ -_ - _ _ _ Religious Assembiv - - q - ❑ - ❑ ❑ - ❑ 13 - ❑ ❑ ❑ - ❑ _ ❑ ❑ ❑ Nnrc. - - - - - - - - - —_ ill -5 ,t iii -66 -1-7 ay t _ TABLE I11 -2 � LAND USE TYPE QEFINit ONS Uses shown in Table 111 -1 are defined as foll.7ws, A. MANUFACTURING USE TYPEg Custom Manufactu.rinc, Activities typically include, ` ! �- but not limited to; manufacturing.. processing, as- semblig9t packaging, treatment, or fabricat?on of ,d ctxstom-MAAd'e products such as jewelry, furniture art :objects, clothing, instruments, and the an -site Wholesale acid retail of the goods produced. They t' uses do not produge odors, noise„ vibration, or particulates which would adversej)y affect uses in �t L the „same structure or on the same Site. Where 2A hours on- site:surveiliarice is nee” amy a caretakers c� residence may be permitted when approved by a Con - ditional Use Permit. - Light lianufactu� r nc�: Activates typically include, �C ' but nqt I!.ml ted to, resea:cli development Iabo.rator^ ies, labor lntdnsive manufacttir:t4, assembly, t 'repair processes, which do not invu,I`ve frequent a truck or rail traffic (more than 4 truck trips daily) or the 'transport of lar a scale g products. The activities do ncs vroOure odors, noise, vibra- tion, or partictfTaGes whiLlh would adversely affect r. other uses in the same structure or on the same c site. Where 24 hours on -site surveillance Is nelcessa,'y,g caretakers residence may be permitted r ''. when approved by a Conditional Use Permit. iL Medium Manufacturng., Activities typically include, Rut not limited to, manufacturing, compounding of materials, processing, assembly, packaging, treat- ment or fabrication of materials and products which either require frequent truck or rail traffic; or the transport of heavy bulky items. Activities may produce noise, odors, vibrations, Illumination, or particulates that affect persons residing in or ionductirg business in the vicinity. Where 24 i i hours on- site surveillance is necessary a caretakers residence be may permitted when approved by a Conditional Use Permit. j L ,t iii -66 -1-7 Minimum imract Heavy Manufactr,rinq: Activities typically € nclude trot not limited to manuf<ctur- ing, compounding of material, processing, asS61biy, packaging, trc�-tment, or fabrication, activitie.$ thiph may have frequent rail or truck traffic Jr;• the transportation of heavy large scale products, Activities in this area may generate noise, odor,' vibration, illumination, or particulates which m+,yr be obnoxious or offensive to persol3s f g af' ronducting business in the vicinity. Uses typi.tal- ly include but are not limited to. forge shops`; metal fabricating facilities, opera welding siibps, woodwor _"ing fac €litie , heavy machine sl+oas, chemi cal storage and distributing, plastic plants, and light or vacuum casting facilities. Not permitted within this area are uses which require massive structures outside o�(.#uildings such as cranes or conveyor systems or unscrcon' open air storage oF large quantities of -raw, semi- refirad, or fini'shad products. Where 24 bodrs on -site surveillance I, necessary a caretakers residence may be permitmf when approved by a Conditional Use Permit. 7 t yI t 1 -7 Heavy Manufacturing: Xetivities typically include but not limited to; .=manufacturing, compounding of material, processing, assembly, packaging, treat- ' ment, or fabrication. Activities in this area may have frequent rail or truck traffic and the trans - portation of heavy large scaly products. Activi- , ties In this area may generate noise, odor, vibra- tion, illumination, cr part €curates which may be obnoxious or offensive to persons residing in or conducting business in the vlcinity. Characteris- ti" of use activities permitted within this area may include massive structures outside of buildings such as cranes, conveyor systems, tooling tokars or unscreen open air storage of large quantities of raw, semi- refined or finished produc ts. t1ses typically include but not limited to; vehicular- assembly plants, power plants, concrete product manufacturing activities, batch plants, scrap yards, air melding foundaries' and aggregate or asphalt yards. 'there 24 hours on-site surveillance is necessary a caretakers residence may be permit - ted when approved by a Conditional Use Permit. s., 7 t yI t 1 -7 Animal Care: Activities typically inciude,b:-,it are not limited to; the provision of animal care`creat', ment, and boarding services of large and small] ani mals. Uses typicall1l include, but are not limited 1 to; animal clinics, Large and small animal hospitals, and kennels. 111-8 1 \, y '., • il. WHOLESALE, STORAGE AND D1STR►19dfioN USE TYPES iii Light Whoiesa ?e, St te. and Jistri'fiution`: ACtVi- �! tres typ�ca ly inciude, butnot limited to;,whole- saling, storage, and warehousing services within enclosed buildings, storage ` -and ynolesale. to re- tillers from the premises of f',:iished goads and ?� Mood prodducts. �etail sales from th<c premises may occur when approved as a Conditionai Use. Where 24 hours on -site surveillance is necessary a caretakers r rest/ ce muy be "permitted when approved by a C ional Use Permit. [ Hpavy Jholsa1 St, ora a arrd D strlhu.tion; Activi- i • ties typicaiiy inciude, but are not ,�itc4,to! wa�hous- ,inn", Storage. freight handling, .-Jk' ltiin z trucking services and terminals; storage a`i wholes soling from the prmmise5 o'r� unfinished, raw, or N semi - refined products requiring further processing, fabrication or manufacturing. y uses in- Typically clude, but are not iimi',ted to; moving and stor,�ge I services, public warehouses, trucking firms, auto- ff i motive storage areas, and the wholesaling of-metals, I� :minerals and agrictiitural products. Outdoor storage is permitted.' Wheire 24 hour_., an -sit' surveillance �.' is necessary a caretakers rest -fence pray be permitted when approved by a Conditional Use Permit, C, COMMERCIAL USE TYPES �- ¢ Administrative and Office: Activities typically �- include, but are not limited to; eriecutive manage - r ' ment, administrative, or clerical uses of privat., _ ~ profit- oriented firms other than public utility (� Firms: Uses typically include, but are not limited to; corporate headquarters, branch offices, and data storage centers. Agricultural Supplies and Services: Activities typically include, but are nc limited to; the r retail sale from the premises %of feed and grain, fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides, and similar good3. Uses typically include, but are not limited —' to; feed and grain stores, welt drilling, and tree service firms. e Animal Care: Activities typically inciude,b:-,it are not limited to; the provision of animal care`creat', ment, and boarding services of large and small] ani mals. Uses typicall1l include, but are not limited 1 to; animal clinics, Large and small animal hospitals, and kennels. 111-8 1 \, y i v1W -1 1 i 111 -9 A Automotive Fleet Storaae: Activities typically i -i- crude, but are not limited ro; the storage of veh'i- cles.used regularly in bi- siness operations and not available for sale an. site. Such uses typically include, but not limited to; overnight storage of rental cars, mobile catering trucks,,and taxi cabs. AUtOIGr; S Rental: Activities typically include, but are not limited to, the rental from the premises of motor vehicles., with provision of incidental maintenance services. Uses typically include, 'but are not limited to, car rental agencies. Automotive Sales: Activities typically include but not limited to,:he diispiay, retail sale, or rental sale, or rental of nrN and used automobiles, miner automotive repair, 'automotive body work, and in- stallation of accessories. Automotive and Light "f ruck Repair- Minor: A.ctivi- ties include, but are pat limited to; automotive and light truck repair, the retail sale of goods and services for automotive vehicles and light trucks (less than 6000 lb), and the cleaning and washing of automotive vehicles. Uses typically in- clude, but are not limited to ;; brake, muffler and tire shops and automotive drive - through car washes. Heavier automobile repair such as trans,aission and engine repair are not included. Automotive and Truck Re,,air- Major: Activities typ- icaily include, but are n limited to; heavy auto- mobile and truck repair sucr as transmission and engine repair, the painting of automotive vehicles,. automotive body work, and the ins *a lation of major accessories. Automotive Service Station: Activities typically include, but are not limited to; the sale from the premises of goods and the provision of service normally required in the day -to -day operation of motor vehicles, including the principal sale of petroleum product;; the incidental sale of tires, batteries, replacement items, and lubricating ser, ices, and the performance of minor repairs, such as tune -up, tire change and brake work. 111 -9 Suildina Contractor's offices and Yards: Activities typically iricl�de,tlffires and storage of equipment, -4 inaterial,s, and vehicles for cont,,actors who are i.1 :. the trades involving, construction activities which ( '+ include but are not limited to gaint- > plumbing, .- ing, electricai. roofing, carpentry, ante other y services. !� auildtne Contractor's Storage Yard: Activities ins de du the ma outdoor storage of la rge. construction equipment such as earthmoving equip - ment, cranes, and out -door storage of building matericals in an unscreened manner., Building Maintenance ervices: Activities typical -, (- y inciudz, but are not ljmr ed) -q; maintenance end custodial services, window clr'` ;g services, . dLs�infecting and exterminat, Iry ces, and jan - toriai srvices. Buildinq Suoolies and Sa Ls: .Activities typically include, but are ,7t limited to, the retail sale or n* rental from the piemises of goods and equipment, including paint, glass, hardware, fixtures, electri- cal supplies and lumber and hardware stores:; And ` i, may have outdoor storage where allowed. Business Supply Retail and Services: Activities typical I y Inc I ude, but are not imited tdl retail ¢' sales, rental or repair from the premises of office equipment, office supplies and similar office goods primarily to firms and other organizations utiliz- ing the goods rather than to individuals.- They ex- clude the sale or rental of motor vehicies and the saie of materials used in construction or buildings oe other sturctures. - Business Support Services: Activities typically include, but ate,not limited to-, firms rather than Individuals of services of a i,lerical, employment, protective, or minor procesaitg nature, Including t multi -copy and blue -print services. They exclude the printing of books, other than pamohlets and small reports for another firm. (1 k- e- t y performed at pri- vate , vate and non - profit clubs and lodges. Uses typ- ically.include, but are not limited to; dance halls, theaters and meeting hails.l I Extensive imoact Commercial: Activities typically include, but are not limited to; those which pro -' -I duce or may produce a substantial' impact upon the surrounding area. Uses typically include, but are not limited to amusement parks, drive -in movie theaters, flea markets, outdoor auction sales, or swap meet activities. Fast Food Sales: Activities which may include but are not limited to the retail sale from the prem- ises of easily prepared foods and beverages such as; hamburgers', hotdogs, chicken, and tacos for either on -site or off -site consumption. Uses may include, but are not limited to drive -in type restaurants. ili-tF Communicati_ ion Services: Activities typical y in- clude , but 'are not limited to; q,roadtastiny %and other inforraation relay services accomplished pri- marily through use of electronic a aria telephonic mechanisms. uses typically include, but are n nit timited.to; television and radio studios and tele, " "ry' graph o=ffices. Conven, enee Sales and Services: Activities, typ'- ical`lj Include: b Ar6 not C61ted' 'to •1:44 reta11 $3 le from the premises of frequently needed small Personal convenience items arid, professional serv- ices which a are u are not �dmited tor, ¢;rug stores, stores selling toll,etr }es, tabaeco,, and magazines,' _ beauty and barbtrshops, and- a:ppa,rel laundering and dry cleaning agencies. Eating and Drinking Establishments Activities' typically include, but,a"re net limited to; 'the reta'll sale from the premises oaf food or beverages preparbd for on- premises consumption.,, ruses typi- cally inc',ude, but are not limited to; rMstaurants ? ?) and bars; excluding fast food type services. Entertainment: Activities typically include, but are not lim..ited, to; cultural, educational, and entertainment services within an enclosed building to assembled groups of sPectators of participants, as well as activities typically ili-tF ` f✓.....�� fi ' inanciai, insurance, vild Real Estate. Seryic- es °ACtwit fit. " ies, typic�J ly include, btn.��re not "1i�rti.EEd to, financial, insurance, real�e,tate aila sepuri- rage services. ties bk'fr64 .�� ;i y Ft.'Ri and Beverau_e Sales: Act- ivities Incj#de, but , < t� 'no.t 1.1mited to the retail salefrom the "'xprem - ises,o1 food and beverages for offpremises, con- sum lion. Uses t P ypicaliy Include, but arse ��ot 1j.mited to; mjni - markets, liquor 5tdres and renai . bakeries; excluding, chain typergracr "y Mores. - Funeral, and ^''.Crematary SeOvje� ens: Activities, typi- iy ' di it ' I "includei but are Wndt' limited to" services voly . the canAL' preparation sno dispos.tion human dead 0 TI loan in cemetariesy Users aypi- {� a ly i iclt�de,± ^but are hot l imi te.& to.; funera.i" ` hsmes, crema.toriev, and mausoleums. . Hotelf;Motel: Activities typically include, but are limited to lodgirsg; services tY;; transient guests on ,a less,-than- monthly bass, other than in the case. -of uses' classifiej as residential uses.' Users tyypically include, but are not limited to; C' hotel'), motels, boarding houses and resorts; Heavy Equipment Sales and lfentats: Activities typ- ic911y include, but are not limited to; the sale or ` rental from the premises of heavy construction equipment, farm•equippent, trucks and aircraft together with maintenance. Uses typically include, but are not limited to; aircraft, farm equipment. heavy truck, large boat (over 25 '). and heavy con- struction equipment dealers. rL L Laundry Services: Activities typically include, ip- but are not 11 -mited to; institutional or commerci -al linen supply and laundry services,!,,)ry cleaning plants, rug cleaning, and diaper service laundries. Medical /Health Care Services; Activities typically include, but are not united to therapuetic, pre - ventative, or correctional personal treatment by physicians, dentists, and other practitioners, as I well as the provision of medical testing and analy- sis services. Health care uses typically include those performed performed by: - Medical Clinics - Family Planning Clinics ` - In- Patienr, Health Care Facilities, - including hospitals. a Ill -12 ; -S3 1 a i s i t. r Personal Services: Activities typically include, a but are not limited to; 'information, instrucCioh arxd similar services of a perso#Al, nature. Uses typically inclgde, but are not 1ir;r`ted to driving ,4! schools, day care facilities, trWvel bureaus, and photography studios. Petroleum_ Products Storaae:' Activities typically inclu(Te, but ara -,not limited to; bulk storage, sale, and distribution of,gasoline, liquified pe- troleum gas, and other petroleum products. Professio,aI Services: Activities typically in- ch'tde but a)re not limited to the provision of ad,vicet, deaign, information, or con!raltatlon of-a professional nature. Uses ty ically'include,'but are not limited'to architect's, engt eer?s, law- yer's, and accountant's offices, and of planning or educational research..s,ervites. Recreational ".ailities: Activities typically in c1.Ude, b,,tt not at to; sports performed either rrdoors or outdoors which require °a facility for conducting the recreational activity. Uses typically, include, but are not limited to swimming centers, skatinr'rink>s, bowling alleys, tennis courts, sports fields, and golf courses. l i. r Repair Services: Activities typically include, but are not limited to repair services involving arti- cles such as upholstery, furniture, and large i electrical appliance repair services. Y Scrap Operat7on: Activities typically include, gut are not timitedJto the storage and sale from the premises and /ord,ismantling of used or waste mate- rials except when such activities are part of a _ E manufactul, >ing operation. ! D. CiVIC USE TYPES Administrative Civic: Activities typically in- clude, but are not limited to: management, ad- ministrative, or clerical services performed by public, quasi- public, and public utility adminis- trative offices. FI l -1 14 r.. wrb i, ice - t j .x CulturraI', Activities <typically include, but "ale �,q not limited tb those performed by the followi,,q 1 ` institutions: y - PubPTc and private non - profit museum and art galleries, (. Public and private non- profit libraries and observatories,, Extensive Tmoa'c,t Utli „ity Facilities: Activities ty=picZlly Include, but are not I invited" 'to those performed by pu=blic agg�cTes or which are strongly vest�ci in the Public tnterest� ancb which pi:o uce or mad produce sbbataci ial rmpaat upon tbe; incFOUnd- Ong area. Use. typiia 'ly Include, but are, snot l`'imited to the following lnf�titution. and i.dstalla- tions: - Irrigation and other canals - Detention and ccrrectionai institutions - Electric, gas,,and oil transmission facilities - Garbage or refuse_ disposal facilities `Major ma i l- proce's`sing centers Radio acid tielevision transmission facili- k ties; including but not limited to booster or relay stations - Rail -road and bus terminals ii - Railroad sights- of-way, railroad yards and bus storage areas - Fsbiic utility corporation or truck yards - Reservoirs, water tanks, and water treatment r facilities L - Sewage treatment facilities and truc=k lines exclusive of individual septic tanks - Steam, fossil, or nuclear power plants - - Truck terminals operated by a public agency Public Assemj,y: Activities typically include, but are not limited to; those performed by, or &t, the _ following institutions or installations: - Parks, botanical gardens, and open space areas of a passive use character; - Public and semi- public playgrounds and play- ing fields, and open space areas of an ac- tive use character; - Public and semi-public meeting halls. STANDARDS 1' 2 3 1 415 1 6 J Ill. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AM 9' - -"'T0 I 11 12 The Development Standards within the Industrial T4 - area address seven factors which includes Minimum - 6neral „Provisions a rlinimum Parcel Size Setback Requirements "�• -_ ! � Lantd?scape Requirements - - Parking E Loading Requirements - 'Rai'l Service Sta, ,,ndards ., Parcel Size (Acres) - Performance Stand:ar`ds 1 l< Table 111 -3 summarizes the app >lication of develop- a '' menu standards Which may apply on a subarea:baisis, i� 5/2 i nel;udfi ng m "in i mum par6z 1 size,; landscape reo i r. e- 112/1 meets, performance regttlremen'ts,, and rail service ''i 5 standards. 'r't, setback reg`u •rc -ments are determined '04th • in`'accordarioe the street classification. y ' TABLE 111 -3 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SUMMARY STANDARDS 1' 2 3 1 415 1 6 J 7 8 9' - -"'T0 I 11 12 13 T4 15 16 Minimum ., Parcel Size (Acres) I 1 l< 1 2/1 2/1 i� 5/2 1 112/1 1 ''i 5 1 Minimum % is of Landscape Area (% of Net Lot Area) 12 10 12 12 7 15 15 12 -1`0/5 10 12 13 1212 10/5 15 Performance Schedule B B B B "8 A A B B/C B 8 A B B' C A Rail Service x Ix l x x x A. General Provisions The purpose of standards within General Provisions is to establish min;mum standards regulating specif- ic details in the development of any project within the Industrial Area. The standards set forth in this section shall apply either within the entire Industrial area or where stato-e by the Land Use category, Signs Signs shall be used for the purpose of !den- ti f icatiorl, and direction.. The 46sign''of Permitted signs shall be4ichitecturall rated lWith teg s qn. *th,&,huJldidW. de I T e sidaratloq�of identiflication '3nd i red- ttonal sigmgInqtudinq the location, ma --ter, i;- o, ats, colors, c ' py an'l the method of si�galnq size,and consltrutt�bn,a�-_ta.,fls a.re all set forth tn Chapter 14 -of -'the City Code �and to contalne�# the 4ppeidix, 9-46 this plan. Lighting Ail. U§htfng !shall be,­U�sed for- the purPve of, Pq prPvidi Ukpmin�atton, for the 5ecurity and of o 1-te ara�,Auc zs parki'6q, #ding, shi.'Ol�rorng,-.Ind.,receliving,�, pathways,, And ,%qqrki nq are4s, The fql loW' lLng sta�14-ardls shalt appl.1 In dij- ar6as.. The design a. of I ight' f ixtures asid Fts :f stWuctura4 support shall be arcki.tectur- a] ly compatible w4:th the surrour�finq buildings b. Parking lot 'shal I' h e lighting f i xtures av C W7 aq,,overall helght not exceeding 15-1. �c. Walkway I-ighting fixtures shall have'an overall height not exceedi 12'. d. Security lighting fixtures are not t 0' project above the fascia or roof line o f the building, e. All lighting is to be shielded to confine light spread within the site boundaries. Particular concern �hall be for lighting adjac -t to residential areas. Equipment Screening A-3. The Purpose of Equipment Screening standards shall be to allow for the use of equipmdrit while preservtnct th�" architectural character and integrity of the surrounding environment. The following standards shall apply according to Land Use category: a. All roof and ground mounted equipment shall be screened fron public view on, all sides within all land use categor- ies except minimum impact heavy indus- trial and heavy industrial. b. Wherever possible, all roof and ground mounted equipment around vie,�t at main building area shall be screened from public view within the minimum impact heavy industrial and heavy industrial 1 categories. c. All _.creening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and where possible a roof parapet mall shall be used to screen roof mcutited equipment. Refer to section tV "Architecture and Design Standards" for further information. w Storage Area A.4. The purpose of'storage area regulations is to allow for on -site storage which is architec- Vii. tural ly compatible with the surrounding en- vironment. The following standards shall apply according to Land `Use ca:'::,;­iory: �t a. Within the Industrial Park category no outdoor storage shall be permitted except for fleet vehicles and light trucks (not exceeding 6,000 lbs.). Outdoor storage tanks may be permitted at a height not to exceed 81 from,highest finish grade when screened from public view by con - crete, masonry or other similar materials. b. Within the General lndustr�al or General Industrial /Rail Served categories all_ materials,.supplies, equipment and oper- ating trucks shall be stored within an .- _� F_ enclosed building or a screened area frc,_ public view: c. Within the Hinim, A mpact Heavy Industrial ,ats�! Heavy industi, 'I categories all mate - .;,s, supplies, equipment and operating -, t -rucks shall be stored within an enclosed building or a storage area. Such storage areas shall be screened within 120' of -� front property lire, '.•a- it d. Within 600' of the Devore Freeway right- o f -way 311 outdoor storage shall be screened from public view from the Devore Freeway. Screening the Devore Freeway may consider the use or combination of block or masonry wali, berming, dense landscap- ing, or building mass.. x h y e. Within all Land Use categories except. Heavy Industrial„ ea screen - a.11 storage ar"`� ing shall be by con -rete, masonry or other similar materials not to exceed Ge a height of 8' from highest finish grade. f. Within 04 Heavy Industrial category storage area screening may include masonry or cohcrete, wood, metal, or chain link with wood slats. C 4 rt i� o: Star'ge of materials or equipment shall Li. not �xceed screen height Within iQU' of street fronting screens. ' h. The City Planner may waive screen. r re- ' quirememts where future building exp3n- - sion would screen abutting storage area.,: " Utilities A.S, The purpose of Utility Service standards id for the efficient distribution of utiltti,- €'s'�1 ' " designed to be compatibie with the surrcund � ing environment. The following requircmenrs' shall apply within the industrial area- a. All existing and new dt "i�lities less than 12KV within the project and along adjacent major artxrials shall be installed under- ground. b. All ground mounted utility appurtenants such as transformers shall be located out of public view of the mai.' building area and adequately screened through the use r or combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and landscape material -s." t3. Minimum Parcel Size i The purpose of a Minimum Parcel Size is to estab,7.- minimum lot size standards which will ['Ovide for the development and use of land within the industri- i al area according to the Land Use category and development standards 1,•- - contained within this Plan. The Minimum Parcel Size is determined by a Land Use category with the exception of portions cf subareas 6, 7, and 12. These _ are described more fully in Part IV of this Plan. Ill -1 Lot Size •8.1. The Minimum Parcel Size shall be setforth as follows: Minimum:Parcel Land Use Category Size (Acres) a. Industrial Park 2�t1 a b. General Industrial c. General Industrial Rail- served 1 d. Minimum Impact Heavy industrial 5/2 -- e. Heavy Industrial 5 * 2 acres minimum parcel size in subareas 6, 7, and 12 an parcels adjacent to 4th Street, Haven Avenue, and Foothill Boulevard. - ** 2 acres minimum parcel size in subarea 9 between Arrow Highway and 1000' south. B.Z. Minimum Parcel width shall =! not less than ' 100', and not less than 2r;'on parcels - huttNg Haven Avenue, Foothill Boulevard, and 4th Street. a Condominium Lots B.3. Condominium lots and lots within an approved T Planned Development are exempt from required minimum parcel size requirements. B 4. All lots of record are allowed to develop according to development standards as set - forth -in this Plan. C. Setback Requirements The purpose of Setback Requirements is to provide rpen space for building separation, landscape treatment, and the encouragement of architectural design diversity. A streetscape >etback is the distance from street frontage where building is prohibited. The following standards shall apply in all areas of the Plan: C.1. All street frontage setbacks are determined from ultimate face of curb. ',. C.Z. Streetscape setbacks include both minimum landscape and minimum building setback re- - ''auirements and are considered coincidental ' along street frontages. lit-19 t Building Setback C,3' Streetscape Setback c.4. C.5. C.6. C -7. C. 8. i r ... Building setbacks shall be as follows (exceot when modified as set '6'rth in items C through C.6): Z a. Front: As shown per street classi- fication. b. Interior Rear: None c. Rear Abutting Street: As shown per street classification. d. Interior, Side: None. tl e, Street Side: As shown per street classification. t Properties adjacent to residential a' -ea'� 1 sbali have a minimum of 45' buildin setback / I� from property line on interior lot one and I 451 from ultimate face of curbs on abutting streets. Areas of other land us% categories abutting an lnd•us�riai Park category shall have.a minimum of 45' building setback to the abutting property line on interior lot line and 45' from ,:?ximate faces of curb on abut -{ tang streets. For buildings exceeding two (2) stories or 35' as measured from highest finish parade,. which ever is more restrictive, an addition- al 1' setback measured from ultimate face of curb shall be required for each additional 30 height. This setback need not exceed r L Along Special Sculevards as shown on, Figure 1.11 -2 streetscapes shall be a minimum aver- C age of 45' from uitima,te face of curb, except L an indicated tii C,$. Streetscape setback requirements shall be C established according to street classifica- tion as shown in Table 111 -4 and as shown on Figure 111 -3 streetscape setback schedule. However, on Special Boulevards. the street - scape setback need not exceed an average depth, equa,t to 20% of the depth of the property a5 measured from ultimate face of r curb, provided that it is not less than the parking setoack depth, 1if -2Q i Y1n -q1 .� D L'" W Lr LL C� LU 0 �.t cC W CL cn aA BACK, SCHEDULE MAJOR ARTERIAL /SPECIAL BLVD. d 120 ft, Re �r) v Day Creek Blvd, s Foothill, s Haven t & Milliken a 4th s• 6th between Maven _& Devore F ,L�� `• s rr Archibald* k:! k e Arrow s Nev R.oe:n"ter r Etiavantia LI.-M,Bike Lana 4rt S30 +31fL way now Min. Setback Prom A.L 43tt. Straataeapa aftd 8u�.�'^� Setback._. -.� L SEECONDARY/SPECIAL BLVD. ri �G a 6th (Nest of Haven) r \ \\ 1111 j"^It S1di4vAlk + t 121!. AOw� 33ft UK Setback from G.ir t ^-- -45ft. Sireatactoo and BU,id{ng. 7711 �m Tk S ^0NDARY (74 & 88 f#. OW) *� �! "vineyard Cleo -eland 6th :,t of Nvare Freevey r J Turner. f[ :. jeme3r ($6r .i.O.w. ) .. t — .'t.wrr..:w • aL.+r� :"}' •._.....= w t• ,� ` Y • .:s iY» ° �'cf l+• r �t= } 6 ;' Parkwdy AQ1Y �• 29 -�t4 it. NUn. -- '^- �+T.s�+� kA S6CGayK }rort P.L. � 9$ }t StrabtacaPS ind BbllftV Sstb /Ck See subarea 15, special =nsideration LOCAL INDUSTRIAL 6 4 ft. ROW) s stn 3 9th •4 s 0 Center rt; Saute Anita of (Old) Rochester s 7th :lest of Haven r tir m -q� 2G/L Min. 50back from P.L 2$1L $tiaatseabs and VaUdIng SstbAOk. s� fi Parking Setbacks Minimum Landscape Coverage TABLE Ill :4 STREETSCAPE SETBACK REQUIR�4iYMTS ' Determined from Ultimate Face of Curb _ Average Landscape and Park,ng' Building Setback Setback Major Arterial and Special Eouievard 45' 25' Secprdary 35` 20' Local 25' 15' C.9. Parking Setbacks as set`rorth in Table lil -4 may be included within the streexscape setback provided that the average landscape setback is maintained according to the street classificatio�i. D. Landscaoe,Requirements The purpose of landscaping is to provide the Indus- trial area greater aesthetic quality, a Ulified;,` architural'ly theme,, and promote energy co• :sprvation. The following requirements shall be applie•Y through - out the Industrial area. D.1. The minimum landscape coverage of net lot area (net lot area includes the ares under property ownership excluding all right -of- way Ondications and private streets) iS -3S follows: Subarea 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 %Landscape Coverage 12 10 12 12 7 15 15 12 10'`/5 10 12 15 12 12 10!5 15 ;, WitKin Suba.-aas 9 and 15, the; minimum landscape coverage shall be 10% of r:et lot area between the area extending from Arrow Highway, 1000' south. Al' remaining area shall'have a 5% minimum landscaped coverage. . Berming Trees Irrigation System D,Z- The landscaped coverage requirement may be modified by the Planning Commission when it is determined that the project is .designed to the highest aesthetic quality compatible with the land use category and consistent with the surrounding land use, 0 .e ,within a Master Planned project area, variation of landscape coverage requirement may be allowed.)_ D -3. Bermed landscaping shall be incorporated wherever poss.ibie within the landscape set -, back and lance_ cape areas surrounding parking" and loading areas, D.4. On Special Boulevards,, all parking areas w01 have berms an average height of three foot and have a maximum slope not to exceed 3:1. D.S. The design of the berms shall be undulating to provide interest and visual access to buildings. D.6. All rc- quired trees will be , minimum of 15 gallon size. D.7. Within parking lots, trees will be planted at a rate of 1 tree for every 3 parking stalls provided in the planters. D.8. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to structures at the equiva- lent of l tree per 30 linear feet of build - ing.dimensions. D•9. All landscaped areas shall be served by an automated irrigation system. G >iQ. Property owners will be responsible for the development and maintenance of landscaping their on -site landscaped area and for the contiguous planted right -of -way. Any damage to the landscaping and irrigation systems shall be planted or replaced within thirty (a.Q) days from date of damage. D.11. The use or comb ?nation of berdi'ing, landscape materials, low level wall, and building mass shall be used to screen parking and loading areas, and refuse co:lection areas from the public view. 11{_255 scaping materials For lbw level screening': `I Size at 3 Years BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAM Height x Width Spacing Buxus Japonicum Japanese Boxwood 5' x 4' 3.0' o.c.I ` Carisa grandiflora Utal Plum 5' x k' Coprosma baueri Corrosma 6, x 4; 3.5' o.c.. Hakea suaveolens Como makes 3.5' o. c:, r Hibiscus rosa- sirensis Chinese Hibascus 5' ' x 5' 4.0' o.c' Ligustrum texanum Japanese Privet c x, 5`04 o.c. ` } Myoporum laetum 3.0 o C. Nerium oleander Myoporum 6' x 6' 5.6' o.c. Oleander 1 Pittos arum tobira 6' x 6 4 «0' a.c. p d 7obira 3' x 4' Viburnum japonicum ` 4.0' O.C. .;Viburnum ' Xylosma congestum Xylosma 5' x V 4.0' o.c. D -73. In order to achieve a uniform landscape j theme, the areas within the street medians, park strip , and streetscape setbacks shall _ have an e+tablished landscape materials 1` pallet coriy.istent with the City's landscdS_ ing theme. Table 111 -5 describes the lard- scaping materials and characteristics pe;; street classification. E. Parki,_ n�E Load.ing Requirements in order to prevent traffic congestion, promote business and enhance= public safety; off street ' parking and loading facilities shall be provided as set forth herein. The facilities required by this section for parking and maneuvering of motor vehi- cles are assumed to be the minimum standard neces- sary for such use. The .following shall apply for the Industrial area: E.I. Parking standards within the industrial area shall be noose set forth in the Zonins Ordinance, Section 61.021 and contallned with the Appendix of this plan. F.2. Required parkif,g shall be located on the same site with''the main use of the building, or on premises contiguous thereto, or in a location in accordance with an approved development plan. - 111 -2.6 —y w ' D D.12. The fallowing is a list of acceptable. land- -7�7 7 c Ic 10 V, ing .0 -E U- wi t:k ON 8 c >Z 4, Z. .7 All US of S E im 1 i —N im *E Cl) m:— 0.1 zip 5Q; 'IM tu IL 17�4 -so .0 1-1 Z'l 4; 4.9 21 0. .!Eggs —=A S Ac cc 'Al ga fd�;4 '�> .,n. ..�, t^r;a�R,r'I - -�'r• ..�:qwq�^'� *!;erg ,'}�"E,�t; .,- �". - . xa f s. �' N1 c c u ti •} �� u. �xo u °_ � era p�' •_ ' '. C 3 c 4 C' Vl f La W 4�L vOOL° 0���jj� a..i o E n k� .tu n.e,:�%10 5 N 3 L 7 ppyy Z oa $��po Y3 �F,c Y i. LU _g �` Y 'a Etc. cad^ 'ti 4< 6a .tea oa y. a °.o.Eiou. LLI ul M. ICL uj s_r C a c+ �°uuu �Q _trams. '°•.: :�••. Qo a .. Q V uou .t. o� �vC V 3�uouu"w. al tl 0 u c n I ZN E E M u9 2 2 a u l u s,. ,- 97 Parking Spaces Required E,3. 1etquired parking spaces shall be determined I the following rates, a. Warehousing or building for storage: f space for 1,000 square feet b, industrial /Manufacturing: t space per 500 square feet C. Office and Administration I space per 250 square feet d. Multi -use tenant wher`C office use does not exceed 35% of building area or "Space" Buildings: I space per 400 square feet. EA 20!t of all requirsd parking stalls shalt be devoted to compact car use. Minimum stall dimension shall be 8' in width and 161^ in length and marked for compact cars. E.S. All Parking areas shalt be screened from public view''rhrough the use of berms, land- scaping material and low walls.. E.6. All loading facilities and maneuvering areas iohoixc DOCK io� IN%GOcx must be an s i to with the use. I E'1. All loading facilities sha'i be permitted only in the rear and interior side yard M11C soIL { areas except within the Heavy Industrial category and rail served buildings. �-- ` [u'`•�.�.•J E,8. Aisle width to loading docks shall be a minimum of 50' width exclusive of truck parkir,� area. E 9 Al Loa d k ng oc s shall be setback a minimum of t l 70' from street property line. E.10. Loading facilities shall be adequately screened from the public view except within 3 the Heavy Industrial category and Rail Served buildings. E.11. Minimum aisle width adjacen' to loading areas shall be 16' one way and 28' for two way. 111 -29 M_1CjCi r p 7"' Ir P i, F- Rail Service Standa, � The Purpose of Rail Service'�Standards is - 'to' provide,, fors >OO s use of Rai _1 Service to certain subareas within -the industrial area. Uses with dependency .: on Rail St-vice shall be encouraged to locate with , subareas 2, 5, 9, 10 and 15. Y - Frii Raii service standa =rds, as set forth in Appendix L, are'suggested guidelines for deveFaping rail access. `The rail.rJad..and the, PU�C.,r y , coms I der mod i f i cation =af t,rack standards, therefore ti•,e project designer shohid consult with the railroad at the time of project design, F.2. Lot divisions and building layouts within subareas 2, 5. 9, 10, anda 15 sl'411 be done ' in manpaer to ensure -for full gotential future i^gii access and should not precip,de rail accj�ss to other properties ;4 thin'.thc subarea. F -3• Within portions of subareas 6 and 11, rail access is permitted under condition that adequate screening ;i is provided for non -rail service areas. Refer to Part IV Subareas 6 and 11 of this Plan for further detail. G. Performance Standards The purpose of Performance Standards_ is to establish I' Industrial Use Stantlard characteristics which allow the uses to operate %:onsistent With the overall characteristics of the Land Use category*. This � section bases its determination cn land use chrac- teristcs of each category.- The intent of the Per- formance Standards is to provide for a healthy, safe, and pleasing environment in keeping with the nature and level of surrounding (ndustria` -etivity. The Performance Standards contained with 1, 6, are applied on a subarea basis as follow, Class A - 6, 7, 12, 16 r Class B - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 10, 11, 13, 14 Class C - 9, 15 CLASS A Performance Standards is the most restric- tive of the Performance Standards. It is utilized for the Industrial Park Category, i ;. z ..a 111 -30 .� 111 -33 vin, � ► �'>, �--- . � .., .� ^CLASS, B Performante Standards a-e employed for the si GenQral Industrial 9 Category,,. These standards are in'., ndee to provide for the broadest range of in -' dustrial activity white assuring for a basic 'level environmental ptotection. ' i; CLASS C Performance Standa,rdk provide for a level of industrial activity associated with tae Heavy industrial us e,rHhile providing safeguards. URBr:N DES►G 5TANDARdS: AND GI)IDELkt;ES 1 i The( establ ishm6t of 11.barn Design standards and guidelines provides the City with the ah'ility to ? ensure.,;that all dsvePlopment In tie industrial Area has coTnpa lirl: archi'tectune and enhanced design 'gtildeIines quality, The are 'genera I an&- 'eh roug,h the Design Review process are intended 4f encourage the individual creativity of project des liners as well as provide for the needs of the individual owner and user. A. trchiteeture and Design Tne; k.4. Building materlA s, color::, and textures ` sk,aii be compaVible w-•ith those of adjacent or nearby bui Vv3 ngs. a° Metal Buildings A.5. T4--use o-i "'brefab, all metal steel for sheathing of buildings is prohibited from - ' the Industrial, Park category. This` is not toYpreclude the use of metal detajl within architecturally desJgned;buildings'such qs.� "Corti n ",tteel. Where used, metal build'y'Ss be r_ shall architecturally designed to be compatibie with the L hd Use category. Screening A.6. Ali screening from public view within ti? Industrial Plan. General industrial General' Industrial /.fail S -erve t Land Use categdries -" :,•.rch as storage spaces, loading docks ,',' and .� equipm6i. shall be architecturally integrat- ed with the surrounding building design through the use of concrete, masonry, or other similar materials, not to exceeq: a height of ii° from the highest finisted grade.. ° A -7. Screening within the Heavy Industrial Lana Use category shall be within 120' of front's property line. Such screening may include ,1,i masonry, wood, metal or chain link fence with wood slats. ., A.8. Development at the corner of Foothill and ^ Haven shall be designed in scale and archi- tecture compatible with nearby historical 11\ buildings. Height and Bulk 'A.9. The height and bulk of buildings shall not unduly block views and the solar access of adjacent and other nearby buildings. A.10. Building placement shall be designed in such ,way to create opportunities for plazas or other landscaped open spaces and encourage defined and spaciously enclosed open space on the same-site or adjoining sites. A.11. Maximum building or structure height shall n ^t exceed four stories or 75", which ever is greater, unless approved as a conditional Use Permit. ; 07 111 -34 A.i2. At ground level, expanses of blank building watts shall be minimized with encouragement of architectural embellishment within the structures. B. Open Spaces The purpose of Open Space standards and guidelines Is to ensure for a safe and )Ieasine erc.rlronment which will enhance the building architecture of the surrounding envirk:nment, It is the intent of the standards and guidelines to provide for a pleasing experience to those who may pass through the area. The following standards and guidelines shall apply throughout the Industrial area. B.I. Open spaces shall be-integrated with pedes- trian wall's and defined by landscaping and other elements to create 8 sense of place, B.Z. Loggias, colonades, and other structures that provide shade to open areas shall be utilized whenever possihlT. B•3. The landscape design of open spaces shall be harmoniois with the design of the buildings on the site and shall enh==-_e their appearance, B•i+. Where possible, open spaces shall be accessi- ble to tPe public and equipped with benches and cthrr seating. Street Furniture 8.5. ZMchef,, tight standards, kiosks, trash re- .:Macias, and other street furniture In on -site open spaces shall be designed in a. coordinated fashion to enhance the appearance and function of the site a, open space. 5.6. All gateway entryways to the City shall be landscaped in accordance with the City'S landscape theme. C. Pedestrian and Bicycle Fa-ilities The purpose of Pedestrian and Bicycle fac hies standards and guidelines 'rs to provide far the use of those activities aithin and around the industrial area. The standards and guidelinet shall apply throughout the industrial area. tli -35 � T. 7 Oil redest-ian Facilities C 1. Pedestrian walks throughA�Npen spac as and accessways to buildings Ohall be re4ulred in order to shorten walkin 0.�stances. C-2. At street lave], the use of U) I 1,dN ng materi- al,,, and . bu i I ding _d=ta.$.'js ?_ 0-hat relate to human activity shall bt�--�eequired. Tj C-3. Pedestrian areas shall go, highly vi'sib,"ie and well lit. C.4. Bicycle storagt facilities shall be� provided within all development and relata to planned and existing bicycle routes. TBicycle and Other Two C.5, Required on-site parkIng may be reduced ar a Wheel Vehicular Facilities rate of one autcmoblie parking space per 4 spaces of bicycle or other two vsheel vehicu- 1-4 lar parking up to threa automobile parking -1 spaces or 5% of total required '�-sita park- ing, whichever is le.ss,. 111-36 A - Ih C, p; SUBAREA 4 General Plan Designation Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial Primary Function ' This subarea extends '"rom Arrow Route south to ATsSF tracks, east of Haven and west of Devore Freeway including industrial users south of ATESF tracks west of Devore Freeway. TI­_ subarea is traversed by the main line of AT&SF railroad on the south with several rail spurs serving the subarea. Substantial portions of the area around Jersey Avenue are developed with both medifm and _ some heavy industrial users. The functior; of this subarea is to provide for the continuation of the existing uses and to provide the opportunity of the expansior, of manufacturing and wa ehousing activity simila' and compatible with tt : existing uses. Permitted Uses Medium Manufacturina t Minimum Impact He'vy Industrial Manufacturing Heavy Manufacturir, Light Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution Heavy Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution Building Supplies and Sales .t Eating and Drinking —' tablishments Repair Services Conditional Uses t %siness Support Services Communication Services Convenience Saler ana Services Fast Fond Food and Beverage Sales i Heavy Equ,r ent Salcs and Rentals f °etrolew.: Products Storage - Recreational r`acilities Extensive ImF, :t Utility Facilities Public Safety and Utility Services "ccess and Circulation rc >'= WIA 120' Right- tlf -4'a Milliken Y 113 17 11' 12'. 14.112' 11t 17 F'3' 1 9d'tt. 1 120'fLROW IIIf IV -44 Y"A — Qte 4 _ t L o �- r`D Z o J ggrsu�wq Q O G O m O O C T O 7 T � � • h 4 +e � c q .0 Z ` °• ii tl is uV R i 'G r •q A 1 S ac N.,qi ®a O w ryry po n '£ 3 q s $� S f 9 q O'S s ^� ) a � 6 N } µ •q 6 J � q � v E9 s" 11 A .. 'a , •, 3 ss° a 511 AREA � 9 (.Continued) Rlght- OF4lay - Rochester n `x r4 Arrow e� 141 lw H2 S2 It .'1II'itL Sa' :light -Of -Way - Cleveland y Jersay Y ^' 112114'112!1121 Y2' t a' 541 Right-0r -Way - 7th W t'°" - Vincent " i � 4i� Utica a 3 and all other lc ^a1 streets 44�It + MiniiTivm !"ircel Size Two (2) acres"-,in tKt area between Arrow Highway extending 1;0001 south, five (5) acres in remaining areas Setback Requirements - Average (Measured f ;(an ultl- Landscaping Parking mite face of turn) Hll7ikerr 45' 25+ Arrow Rochester G1 ?veland 35' 2QI J.. se., 25' 15' $th 9th ++! Vinceat,:'atica, and all o,har IDCal i s ..�.. OV SUBAREA 9 (Continued; Lancsca e, Requirements p 10�, f the net. lot area in the area between Arnow Ni,�ghlay,extending }" 1000' smith S% of the net Tat area to the remaini,i "g iwea (° Performance: Requirements Noise: The m" imam al Towable -noise level of any "" use s#�a11 not 'Exceed 85U, as Measured at the lot ( line of ;,he lot containing the use. Where a use is within 200 feet of - Psidc;,,lally -oned land`, the noise I?wftl shall nu-, exceed G Ldn• `+here a use occupies a lot a4uttiag or separated dy a street from a foe within ti?e designated, ClaL,s A or B- performance standard -)r residential Y. ro ert the p performance standard oP tha c�+4 :tong property shall o apply at the common or facing lot line... Vibra,ian: Air uses shall be operAvzli so &Z not to • >r ± generate vibration discernible wiehayt Instruments �, ;, l•y the average perrton beyond 600' fr40 where fire re source is located, Vibratien caused y mJtor vehl tie:t trains,'ind temporary construct [on and demo! i- tior- is exempted from this standard. �- Partinslate Matter and Air 4'6ntam—K1ns,, In aildi -' tion to compliance with tine AQM:O 5taridards, ;j(1 uses shgTl be so as not to emit paetic,t- 'operated late matter or air contaminants which: (a) are l injurious to the health cry either persons engaged In or reiated to the use of the lot, or persons ' residing, working, visiting, or rocrew ing in rf:ighboriny areas; (b) substantially end adversely r ` affect the maintenance of property in oearb:f areas, (c) are disruptive of industrial processes _arried on in otncar parts: of ' it Industrial area. Where; a' l( c use occupies a lot abu.Inq or Separated by a street lot with designated Class A or 8 performance standard for part s`cul ate ,Matter and air contaminants _ shall apply at the commot► or facing lot iNie. - Odor: All uses shall be operated so as not to emit matter causing unpleasant odor: which are perceptive TI, to the average person 600' beyond any lot line of the lot containing such uses. iv -k8 be 0 Humiditv,,Heat. and Glare^ All use5heatliglare, or it ' humidity. t.gl ated nor io pr� off` stile whicl,;is p r high-intensity illumination by the a4erage person while on Without instruments ur oses or MY pA "- any lot zoned for reW=thnCla s or. B nerformanl: industrial property standard designation. conflicts between uses within . �- �.. Special Ou't to the patent-jai this subarea and the uses within the industrial Consideration yg bui'ding 5eat- Park Category of adjacent Subarea Medium Manufactur- back from abutting property lntenlsit¢ shall be not less than ing and greater 45 +, Both the potential park site locatiq +: and,, to 'Indicate apprOl" ftr'� station location are shown mate location. shall Freeway Development within 60Q' of the Oevore cexist onl # have outdoor storage areas BeC °m5�eo�i the ng view along the . wiCh rail service needs are secs Pail service, users per within the area west of Milliken Avenue. AMIK r iv -49 Y� —liC b n E y- ' � 5 a° T BV. n a x R S d � S �3 GYn D az 3 H W—" -a�Fcx Xi a3 9 3 � . s SL. —,. >Q a 4 .S °" �AA r Z r is v W uJ i a� �g o?:; o'se 33 fLO nEaM _ac ^3 _. Noa -� °^i - �I3 n:R�o ^ _ �'o3e �J.� x41n s:a Sa3,$ Y � ..,[ Z+� a° T BV. n a x R S d � S �3 GYn D az 3 H W—" -a�Fcx Xi a3 9 3 � . s SL. —,. � <s a° T BV. n a x �E Vvw � aims cJn GYn D az 3 H W—" -a�Fcx aa'�3o 3 R. as a __ l ^R >r--aa �» '- En n ;3v.. YY1 Q M1I� a x-j '°^Sr `S3g�ie 3 8R�_ n m j N I, S! a;ti! — f 0 m v 10) x, y� . W—" 5=46-42% R. >Q a 4 — S g . l ^R >r--aa �» '- En n ;3v.. YY1 Q M1I� a x-j '°^Sr `S3g�ie 3 8R�_ n m j N I, S! a;ti! — f 0 m v 10) x, y� . a Humidity, Heat, and !;lace; All uses shall be uper- a7,0 so as not to proppce humidity, heat, glare, or `high- t intensity il,lv!Rn t•i,on which is patcentible Without instrvrlemts by the,aver ge person while on.. } any tot zoned for residential purposes or any ,industrial property With Class A or &" perforrance standa d designation. Special Consideration Due to the potential conflicts between uses within this subarea And the uses within the Industrial ''Park Category of adjaca,rt Subarea 93, building get- back from abutt'ng property for Medium Manufactur- ing and greater'lntensity shall -be not less thon 45'. Both the potential park site'116caticn and fire station location are shown to`i,ad.i,cate approxi- mate location. Development within 600, of the Devote t:reeuay shall have outdoor storage areas completely screened from "ong vigw a; the freeway. Because of the existing rali service, users with rail service needs are permitted within the area west of Milliken Avenue. - Iv-49 - i SUBAREA 9 (Continued) landscape Requirements 1O of the net lot are, in the area beztoenr Arrow s ±; fft, i waV ektea ding IOOO' south 5% of "be net lot area in the remaining area Performance Requirements 4o�se. The.mdximum allowable`n'61se level of any use shall not exceed 65y-d, as measured at th :;lot { line of the 'lot containing the use. " Where use is with'itt'24" feet of residentially zoned'iand, the 601'50 level shall not exceedr 65Cdn• , Where a use °Q Gtcu #i:a's a lot abutting or separated by a street from a. -lot within the designateJ Class A or 8 performance standard or residential propl'rty,.",e performance standard of tite abutting pmiperty'Shall ' apply at the common or facing lot line. Vibration.: All .uses shah be operated sa as not to. geneate.vibratif',x di scernible.without,Instruments " by the average person beyond 600" From where the source is - located. Visration caused'i.by motor vehi -' clF, trains, and temporary construction and demoli- Ucn is ck^,mw�cd from this st,,)ndard. Parti- culate Natter and - Air Cantaminans: In�Hdi- �$ tion -to complianes :vith' ha AQMO standards,.all uses shall be- ,operated so as not to ehit parti: u- late matter oi' air ccntamt<lants which: (a) are injurious to the health of eithar persons engaged in or related to the use of the lot, or persons residing, working, visiting, or recreating in neighboring areas; (b) substantially and adversely �- affect the maintenance of property in nearby areas; - (c) are disruptive of industrial processes carried `S II on in other parts of the industrial area. Where a ' use occupies a lot abutting or separated''b:y a str8et 'lot with designated Class A or B performance standard for particulate matter and air contaminants �{ [ shall apply at the common or racing lot line, �. Odor. All uses shall be operated r�c as not to emit matter causing unpleasant odors wKich ore perceptive;k, to the average person 600' beyond any lot line of the lot containing such uses. l rn -J13 ` t 7 A -SUBARVA 9 (Continued) �y 100'! Right- Gf 4lay Rochester Arrow -• L 141 18' A21121 121 1811 _ el - 100 ft ROW 8 &' Right -Of -Way, - Cleveland Jersey 64'tt 88'ft.ROW 54' Right-Qf -Way 7th ll Vincent I �_ af�t•s' Utica lT and all other local streets . 5' 1 22'ft. 221 •'51f. aa'ft , 54'It.ROw i Minimum Parcel Size Two (2) acres in the area between Arrow Highway extending 1000,' south, five (5) acres -t remaining areas 1� Setback Requirements Average:. (Measured from ulti= landscaping Parking' mate face of curb) Milliken 45' 25'' i Arrow sx If Rochester If Cleveland 35f ZCsi Jersey 25' 15` 7th 4# 1t {l Eth s, is is 9th It i Vincent, :Rica, and ' 1 if �) all other local _ streets a j 1V -47 � x \Z of rf, O O O ' O O 4 N i t 6 Iii. it 0a L p Gi NJ U � =0 J • \/ � u n °u c °> °E 3 : .i9 O _ °9 =• 3 3 L e C D O ° o i • • W U � •� u� • ° CO 3u ngO° W1 General Plat: Designatidrt. Primary Function Permitted Uses Conditional Uses X11: susAREA 9 Hinimum icpactHeay., Industrial This subarea extends from arrow Route south to ATSSF tracks, east of !lave,, and west of Devore' Freeway including industrial users south of AT&sF tracks west of Oevore Freeway, The subarea is traversed b; the main line of ATESF railroad an the south with several rail spurs serving the subarea. Substantial portions of the area around Jersey Avenue are developed with both nedium and some heavy industrial users. The function of this subarea is to provide for the cant >nuation Of the existing uses and to provide the opportunity of the expansion of manufacturing and warehousing activity similar and compatible With the existing uses, Medium Manufacturing Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial Manufacturing Heavy Manufacturing Light Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution Heavy tinolesale, Storage, and Distribution Buildinj Supplies and Sales Eating and Drinking Establishments Repair Services Business Suoport Services Communication Services Convenience Sales and Services Fast Food Food and Beverage Sales Heavy Equipment Sales and Rentals Petroleum Products Storage Recreational Facilities Extensive impact Utility Facilities Public Safety and Utility;;arvices Access and Circulation 120' Right-o, -Way - Mi 1 1 i Kt!r* asp W` 13 '17 11 121 IA r 12; 11'17 '13 ` 24'tt. t i 1 120 tt RO�V t ' l 11/-44 (, / ► i�T 0 WLE E0 Issuing Ofrice: 303 WL5'T FIFTH .r,TREPT P.O. BOX 1130 SAN BERNARDINC,, CALIFORNIA 92403 (714) 889 -zs'tl JOHN GALL 333 S. GRAND AVENGE, 37TH FLOOR LOS ANGELES, A 90D71 Your Ref; Attention: Our No: 686011 -7 Dated as of June 23, 1986 at 7:30 a.m. In response to the above referenced application for a policy of title insurance,. SAFECO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY hareby report, that it is prepared to issue, or cause to be issued, of of the date hereof, a Policy or Policies of Title Insurance describing the -i�ad and the estate or interest therein 4--reinafter set forth, ins -ring against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, .lien or encumbrance not shown or referred to as an Exception in Schedule B or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions and Stipulations of said Policy forms. The printed Exceptions and Exclusions from the coverage of said Pali .y or Policies are set forth in the attached list. Copies of the Policy forms should be read. They are available from the office which issued this report. THIS REPORT (AND ANY SUPPLEMENTS OR AHF_�W 1ENTS HERETO) IS ISSUED SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF FACILITATING THE ISSUANCE OF A POLICY 0b' Tr?R M- SURANCE ANi, NO LIABILTTY IS ASSUMED BEEEBY. IF IT IS DESIRED THAT LIaBILITY BE ASSiAED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A POLICY 0- TITLE INSURANCE. BE REQUESTED. A BINDER 01, COiil4lgrFNT SHOULD The form of policy of title insurance contemplated by this report is: 1. California Land Title Association Standard Co -erage Policy 2. American Land Title Association Owner's Policy Form B 3- American Land '4-le Association Residential TI-le Insurance Policy 4. American Land Title Association Loan Policy. e Title lolft�cer DEtIISE HRiDE M -)1-7 Iz C) r 4 1. Order No, 6Z60I1 -7, SCHEDULE A 1. The estate or Ltterest in the ,land herea,paf ter described -or reierr,-d to covered by this report is: A FEE 1 2. Titie to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in: PHILLIP D. SCHLOSSER AND 11LAINE M. SCHLOSSER.' husband and wife, as community property, as to Parcel 1,• , ° PHILLIP D. SCHLOSSER AND ELAINE 14. SCHLOSSER, husband and wife, as tenants in common, as Co an ui 4iv ded 1/3 interesj4 JEFFREY P. SCHLOSSER AND JACQUELINE L. SCHLOSSMR, husband and wife, as tenants, in common, as to an undivided 113 interest; and ALBERT W. HOLGUIN AND ROBERTA J. HOLGUIN, husband and wife, as tenants in common, as to an undivide4 113 - aterest, as to Parcei 2; and ALBERT W. HOLGUIN, JR. AND R0BEc1TA J. HOLGUIN, husband and wife, as community property, as to an undivided 1/4 interest; PHILLIF D. SCHLOSSER AND ELAINE M. SCHLOSSER, husband and wife, as community property, as to an undivided 1/4 interest; i JEFFREY P. SCHLOSSEh;,AND JACQUELINE L. SCHLO SSG,1, p husband and wife, as .community property, as to an undivided 1/4 interest; and DAVID M. RICHARDSON AND JEAN M. RICHARDSON, : rusband and wife, as community property, as to an undivided 114 interest.. as to Parcel 3 3. The land referred to in this report is situated in the State of Cali — forma, County of San Bernardino, and is described as follows: SEE DESCRIPTION ATTACHED 7 '-b 6db011 —T ' DESCRUITIGN DLS'C UPTION F'AACEL 1: Vie West 438. d 66 feet or Lots 25 and 26 of Rochester, as per rl 1 recdrdc in Book 9 of Ma +�;., Page 20, record's of stud: Count.}*. EXCEPTING therefrom the West 50 feet of said Lot 25. PARCEL 2: Lots 25 and 26, Town of Rochester, wi par plat recorded in Book 9 of 'daps, (I Page 20, records of said County. EXCEPTING therefrom the West 438.66,geet thereot. PARCEL 3: i of 27, according to Mep of kochester, as 'Ver plat recorded in Book 9 of Maps,, Page 20, records of said County. KI Larder No. 686011 -7 5'nheGUle B pas:- 1 SCHEDIME B At the date hereof exceptions to coverage in addition to the printed Exceptions and Exclusions in the pslicy form designated on the Face page of thJs Report would be as follows: L. Property tastes, including any assesiszents collected with taxes, to be levied for the fiscal year 1986 -1?8' which a e a lien not yet payable. 2. Property taxes, Including any personal property taxes and any assua3ments collected with taxes, fcr the fiscal, year 19115 -1986. 1st Installment: $7,694,.90 paid 2nd Installment: 7,694.85 Pa-,d Homeowners Exemption: Hone Code Area: 1591:6 Assessment No: 22?- 111-05 Affects: Parcel 1. 3. p_operty taxes, including any personal property taxes and any assessments collected with taxes, for the fiscal year 1985 -19864 1st Installment. $4,856.22 Paid 2nd installment: 4,856.IC, Pr, Homeowners Exemption, Hone Code Area: 15016 Assessment No, 2229 - 111 -18 AffectE: z'-rcel 2. 4. Property taxes, including any personal property taxes and any assessments ' collected with taxes, for the Fiscal year 1985 -1986. rst Installment: ;9,290.61 Paid 2nd arstallment: 9,290.57 Paid Homeowners E,<emptir a: None Code urea: 15016 Assessment No: Z,9- 111 -17 Affects: Parcel 3, S. The lien of supplemental taxes, `_f any assessed pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3.5 (co=encing with Section 75) or the Revenue and Taxation Code of the Stste of California. m �;, �� . � � ,, , � � ��° Q� X r mg Order No. 686011 -7 Schedule B Page 2 6. Bond report to follow. 7. An easement for the purpose shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document Granted to: Rochester'.Jater Company Purpose: pipelines Recorded: April 18, 1889 in Book 98, Page 25 and Book 97, Page 163 of Deeds The exact location and extent of said easement is not disclosed of record. 8. An easement for the purpose shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document Granted to: County of San Bernardino Purpose: roads Recorded: December 23, 2925 in Book 35, Page 317, Official Records Affects: The North 25 feet of Parcels 1 and 2. 9. An easement for the purpose shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document Granted to: County of San Bernardino Purpose: highway and road Recorded: August 14, 1970 in Book :air, Px!F3e 165, Official Records Affects: The North 50 feet of Parr_ =1 1. 10. An easement for the purpose shown below ari righ�s incidental thereto as set forth in a document Granted to: Southern California Edison Company Purpose: public utilities Recorded: September 25, 1970 in Book 7523, Page 720, Official Records Affects: As follows: A strip of land, 10 feet in width, beginning at a point on the Southerly line of Arrow Highway, 60 f-et in width, distant Easterly 50 feet along said Southerly line from the Westerly line or said Lot 25; thence Southerly, parallel with said Westerly line and the Westerly line of said Lot 26, a distance of 305 feet. 11. Restrictions on the use, by the owners of said land, of the easement area as set out in the easement document Recorded: September 25, 1970 in Book 75'-3, Page 720, Official Records 12. Au easement for the purpose shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document Grantel to: Southern California Edison Company Purpose: public •ltilities Recorded: March 5, 1976 in Bock 8877,; Page 968, Official Records M- t al 11 ri e 2 S AFECO TITLE WSURANGE Order No. 686011 -" Sc:;.edule B Page 3 Affects: As -follows A strip: of land, 10 feet in w1d61, the centerline of said str :i Yeing described as follows; Beginning at a point in the Southerly line of Arrow Route, 60 feet wide as now established, distant Easterly thereon 23: feet from the Westerly line of Lot 25 thence Southerly 180 feet parallel with the Westerly line of said lot, to a point hereinafter referred to as "Point A ". Also, a strip of land, 2 feet in width, lying within said lot; the centerline o: sa4d strip being described as follows: Beginning at above said "Point A:'; thence Southerly, parallel with said Westerly line, a distance of 25 feet. 13. A deed of trust to secure an indebtedness in the amount shown below, and any rather obligations secured thereby rtgount: erformance of the terms and obligations of a Continuing Guaranty dated March 15, 1973, executed by Phillip D. Schlosser and Elaine M. Schlosser, as Guarantors, in behalf of Schlosser Forge. Co., a corporation, and all of the; indebtedness of Schlosser Forge Co., a corporation, whether now existing or now created to the beneficiary he r�-in. Dated: May 9, 1979 Trustor: Phillip D. Schlosser and Elaine M. Schlosser, who are married to each other Trustee: Continental Auxiliary Compaq, a California corporation Beneficiary: Bank of AmeriL— National Trust and Savings Association, a national banking association Recorded: May 16, 1979 in Book 9687, Page 380, Official Records Affects: Parcel 1. 14. A Consent to Removal of Personal Property Affixed to Real Proper_y, in favor of Bask of America NT & SA, Cucamonga p56, recorded May 30, 1980, as Instrument No. 80- 125959, Official Records, affects Parcel 1. 15. An easement for the purpose shown below and rights incidental thereto as , set forth in a document Granted to: City of Rancho Cucamonga Purpose: highway and road Recorded: April 29, 1981, as Instrument No. 81- 093686, Official Records Affects: As follows: Those portions of Parcel 2 described as follows: w i Order No. 686011 -7 Schedule B Page 4 Parcel 1: The South 20 feet of the North 50 feet. Excepting therefrom the East 30 feet thereof SAFECO 'nnE,INsuaar CE Parcel 2: The East 20 feet. Excepting therefrom the North 50 feet thereof. Parcel 3: A triangular parcel bounded on the North by the South line of Parcel 1, bounded on East by the West line of Parcel 2, and bounded on the Southwest by a circular arc concave to the Southwest having a 24 foot radius curve ranger to said South and West lines. 16. A covenant and agreement Executed by: Schlosser Forga In favor of: City of Rancho Cucamonga, ,alifornia, a municipal corporation Recorded: May 13, 1981, as Instrument No. 81- 104975, Officia.. Records Which among other things provides: To postpone construction of offsite improvements until a water date. 17. An easement for the purpose shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document Granted to: Southern ;alifornia Edison Company Purpose: public utilities + Recorded: November 2, 1983, as instrument No. 83- 258206, Official Records Affects: Parcel 1. END OF SCHEDULE B NOTE N0. 1: The charge for a policy of title insurance, when issued through this title order, will be based on the basic (not short -term) title insurance rate. NOTE NO. 2: We wl,l require a statement of information from the parties namea below in order to complete this report, based on the effect of documents, proceedings, liens, decrees, or other matters which do not specifically describe said land, but which, it any do exist, may affect the title or impose liens or encumbrances thereon. rn -1P-3 xi TITLE W�URAN : °_ � Order No. 586011 -7 Schedule B Page 5 Parties; David Richardson (Note: The statement of information is necessary to complete the s ".arch and examination of title under this order. e1,ny title search includes matters th:�t are indexed by name only, ant having a completed statement of information assists the Company in the elimination of certain matters which appear to involve the parties but is fact affect anotner party with tho same or similar �- name. Be assured that the 0tatement of information is ewsential and will be kept strictly considenrial;.to this tile.) dp/ lm, r yy� -la`s i J a I't a .1 e1 _ �:• y 4 01 a ° �N ` y Ile k i Z Q 't7 I ` TC4 MC T4 IS CG - i W n i 1 M m i UJORAME � �8• �( . r r �+'�y D° N o 0 ' jL 7 1 ' Y �; i ROCHESTER AVENUE AVE" A1 w N - T1iIS LB 7OT A4 SC1t'BT 07 THE IX4D. BUT IS COMLITO TO[ IY701PGTION OSLY, - Sol IS IT A ➢ABT or nM WORT, 01 70LICY TO LUCH ST HAY BE AT'IACYED. r AA-12 LIST OF, PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS 1. CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY - 1973 SCHEDULE B This policy does not insure against foss or damage, not against costs. 3ttorneys'teesor expenses. any or all of which arise by reason of the following: Part I 1, Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing hens by the records of any taxine authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes cr assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records Of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests . or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an in- spection of the land or by making inquiry of persons in pos- session thereof. 3. Easements. liens orencumbranCes .or claims thereof. which are not Shown by the public records. 4, Discrepancies, conflicts In boundary lines. shortage in area. encroachments, at any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. S. (a) Unpatented mining claims: (b) reservations or excep- tions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof: (c) water rights, claims or title to water. Am 8. Any right, title, interest, estate or easement in lanai beyond the lines of the area specifically described or rPSerred to in Schedule A, -it in abutting streets. roads, avenues, alleys, lanes. ways or waterways, but nothing in this paragraph shall modify or limit the extent to which The ordinary right of an abutting owner for access to a physically open street or highway is insured by this policy. 7. Any taw, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning ordinances) restricting or regulating or prohibiting the occupancy, use or enjoyment of the land, or regulating the character, dimensions. or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land, or prohibiting a separation in ownersuip or a reduction in the dimensions or area of the land, or the effect of any violation aS any such taw, ordinance or governmental regulation, B. Rights of eminent domain or governmental tights of police power unless notice of the e-2rcise of such rights agpears in the public records, 4. Defects. liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) creat)d. suffered. assumed or agreed to by the insured claimanl: (b) not shown by the public records and not otherwise excluded train coverage but known to the insured claimant either at Data of Policy or at the date such claimant acquired an estate of interest insured by this policy or acquired the insured mortgage and not disclosed in writing by the insured claimant to the Company prior to the date such msur ^.d claimant became an insured hereunder: (c) resulting in no loss ordamage to the insured claimant: Id) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy: or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had been a pur chaser or encumbrancer for value without knowledge. 2. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY FORM B - 1970 (Rev. 10- 17- 70and- 10.1' -84) SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of thfs policy: 1. (a) Governmental police power. (b) Any law. ordinance or governmental regulation relating toenvironmentatprotection. (c) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning ordinances) restricting or regulating of Prohibiting the occupancy, Usti or enjoyment of the land, or regulating the character, dimensions or location of anyimprovement now or hereafter erected on the lane. or prohibiting a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a pan. (d) The effect of any violation of the matters excluded under (a), (b) or (c) above, unless notice of a defect, hen or encumbrance resulting from a violation has been recorded at Date of Policy in those records in which under state statutes deeds, mortgages, tis pendens, liens or other title encumbrances must be recorded in order to impart constructive notice to purchasers of the land for value and without knowledge. provided, however, that without hmitahon, such records shalt not be construed to include records in any of the olfices of federal. state or local environmental protection, zoning, building, health or public safety authorities. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice-( the exercise of such rights appears in the public records at Date of Policy. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, Suffered. assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant, (b) not known to the Companyand notshown by the public records but known to the insured claimant either atDate of Policy or at the date such claimant acquired an estate or interest by this policy and not disclosed in writing by the insured claimant to the Company pror to the date such insured claimant became an insured hereunder; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant: (d) attaching or creav ! subsequent to Date of Policy: (e) resulting in Inss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid valurt or the estate or interest Insured by this policy. (List of Printed Exceptions and Exclusions Continued on Reverse Side) SAFECO Stock No. CAP -0372C 1Rev. 4.85) m —la jcip . L iST OF PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS (CONTINUED) 3. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION RESIDENTIAL TITLE INSURANCE POLICY -1979 EXCLUSIONS In addition to the exceptions In t :hedute B. you are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees and expenses resulting from: 1. Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of any law or government regulation. This includes building and zoning ordinances and also laws and regulations concerning: • land use 0 ldnddivision • improvements on the land • environmental protection This hxclusion does not limit the zoning coverage described in Items 12 and 13 of Covered Title Risks. 2. The right to take the land by condemning it. unless a notice of taking appears in the public records on the Policy Date. 3. Title Risks: • that are created, allowed, oragreed to by you • that are known to you, but not to us, an the Policy Date -unless they appeared in the public records. that result in no loss to you • that first affect your title after the Policy Date . this does not limit the labor and material lien coverage in Item 8 of Covered Title Risks. 4. Failure to pay value for your title. 5. Lack of a right: • to any land outside the area specifically described and referred to in Item 3 o Schedule A. or • in streets. alleys. or waterways that touch your land. This exclusion does not limit the access coverage in Item 5 of Covered Title Frisks. SCHEDULE S - EXCEPTIONS In addition to th Exclusions, you am not insured against loss, costs, attornrys' fees, and expenses resulting from; Part 1 (a) Any rigs*_ interests or claims o; parties in possession of the landnotshown by the public records. (b) Any easements or hens not shown by the public records. This exception does not limit the lien coverage in Item 8 of Covered Title Risks. (c) Any facts about the land which a correct survey would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. This exception does not limit the forced removal coverage in Item 12 of Covered Title Risks. (d) Any water rights, claims or title to water on or under the land. 4. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY - 1970 WITH A.LT.A, ENDORSEMENT FO -1M 1 COVERAGE (Rev. 10-17-70 and 10- 17 -84) SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the cevr rage of this poltcy: 1. (a) Governmental police power. (b) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation relating to environmental protection. (c) Any law. ordinance or governmental regulation( includingbut notlimitedtobuildingandzoningordinances) restnetingorregulatingorprohibiting the Occupancy, use or enjoyment of the land, or regulating the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land. orprohibiting a s- paraiion in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the Candor any parcel of which the land is or was a part. (d) The effect of any violation of the matters excluded under ta). (b) or ;cl above, unless notice of a defect. lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation has been recorded at Date of Policy in those records in which under stale statutes deeds. mortgages. Cis pendens. liens or other title encumbrances must be recorded in order to impart constructive notice to purchasers of the land for valuo and without knowledge; provided. however, that without limitation. such records shall not be construedlO include recotdsin any of theofkcesot federal. state or local environmental protection. zoning. budding, health or public safety allthorsties. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise of such rights appears in the public records at Date of Policy. 3. Detects, liens, encumbrances. adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered. assumed. or agreed to by the insured claimant (b) Qh known to the Company and not shown by the public records but known to the insuredclaimant either at Date of Policy orat the date such claima acquired an estate or interest insured by this policy or acquired Ina insured mortgage and not disclosed in writing by the insured claimant to ine Company prior to the date such insured claimant became an insured hereunder, 1c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant id) attaching or created subsequent to Datr, of Policy (except to Ina extent insurance is afforded herein as to any statutory Len forlabor or material or to the extent insurance is afforded her as to assessments for street improvements under construction or completed at Date of Policyl 4. Unenlorceablityofthet: enattheinsuredmongagebecau5eofladureoftheinsuredatDateofPolicyorofanysubsequentowneroftnemdeolec• ness 10 comply with applicable doing busm ^ss laws-It the state in wnich me lands situated e EM �I i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: July 23, 1986 i T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City planner BY: Bruce Cook, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12830 - CITATION BUILDERS - request to delete the requirement to finish to—TeTa—d end on arnet Street as a cul -de -sac south of Tract 1283U located j on the west side of Beryl Street at Cielito Street F. G,. Linton of Citation Builders has submitted a letter withdrawing the request to amend the Con!:itons of Approval for Tract 12830 scheduled for the Planning Commission agenda of July 23, 1986, Re ptfully su ted ull r City ;Planner BB:BC:ko ITEM N ,.. .'�.. s . „.. . -.y. gyp ix • � W II :17731 IRVINE 13.tVD., Suits No. 201.TUSTIN, CA. 92680 (7141'131.0141 ' Cl),,: C, --Ii/ F3...r RANCHO CUCAMONC 1 I�!JINNINQ DIVISION 'wi t& t Jt”, 6 1986 �'`{ °F�¢�tl0l1ljk1�+�13 4 PIS +1"7y 14, 1986 tu�6 S Brad Buller City Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga P.U. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 "• De&r Brad: We would like to withdraw our reques�"'>to amend the :Subdivision Agreement for tract 12830 scheduled fior- rjaviniug Commissi"q " action on July 23rd. We have not been afforded the level of cooperation that should r reason >bly be offered regarding issuance of a Building Permit 9 9 g for our new ,plan in tract 12238 and until that matter as well as the C.U.F. is resolved, we would like to hold in abeyance the Garnet Street improvements. Sincerely, CITATION BUILDERS, a partnership i' F. G. Linto�l, Jr. Developmen Manager FGLir:sf STAFF REPORT DATE: July 23, 1986 ---1977--- TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FRuA: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Associate Manner SVLLIBCT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86-13 - manufacturing buildings totaling 139,000 square feet and Phase IT development consisting of 2 warehouse distribution buildings totaling 223,400 square feet on ZZ acres of land in the General Industrial/Rail Served District located at the east side of Vineyard Avi!nue between Arrow Highway and 9th Stree". - APN: 209-012-16. ' ! l' PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. of conceptual Master Plan, Phase and u si e plans and elevations, and issuance of a Negative B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: Worth - Apartment project under constructior, Bear Gulch South Park; Medium Residential District B-14 du/ac - Vacant, - East - Vacant, existing industrial buildings; Gtmeral Industrial/Rail Served District Subarea 2 ~"=~ - ".. e'""se, ../ww^"r`^' park, vacant; General Industrial District C. General Plan Designations: Project Site General Industrial/Rail Worth - Medium neo i entYal 4-14 du/ac South - Ganenu Industrial/Rail Served East - General Industrial/Rail Served West - Genera] lxdvstrial ' ITEM 0 PLANNING COMMRISSION STAFF REPORT July 23, 1986 G' DR 86 -13 - Messenger Page 2 i I, D. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant and slopes gently to e soutneast a approximately 2% grade I, Vegetation consists of weeds and i„digenous grass with approximately iD mature Eucalyptus trees located west of the existing railroad tracks as shown in Exhibit "G ". The development of Phase II would result in the removal of these Eucalyptus trees, A tree removal permit has been submitted for review and approval concurrently with thi',. Development Review, II. ANALYSIS: A. General: U Master Plan: The Master Plan consists of 3 Phases. Phase 1s o acres in size and planned for multi- tenant industrial development, Phase TI is approximately 13.3 acres in size and planned frr large,, speculative industrial buildings with limited rail service, and Phase IIi is 4,4 acres in size and is planned for multi- tenant industrial buildings. The developer is requesting approval for phase I and II developments of the Master Plan. Phase -III wil', be subject to a separate Development /Design Revie.r process. A related Parcel Map (9972) has been submitted and will be forwarded to the Planning Commission for review as soon as all of the technical issues such as drainage have been resolved by the developer. 2. Phase I and Phase II Developments: Phase I development Is oca a a on a sou si e a rrow Route and north of the Railroad spur. It consists of 7 industrial multi- tenant buildings with a main entry plaza located in front of Building 2 and a secondary plaza located between Buildings 2 and 5. The proposed elevation consists of painted tilt -up concrete panels, deep reveals and painted large concrete square columns. Buildings 1, 2 and 3 along Arrow Route show additional articulation to the building surface treatment and building plane through increased glass area, increased height of building, railings, and recessed loading roll -up doors, phase II development is located north of 9th Street and south of the - Railroad,,. spur. It consists of 2 large warehouse /distribution industrial buildings with potential for more Than one user. Building 13 will be served by rail. Central plaza area have been provided in the middle of the site. Proposed elevations consists of painted tilt -up concrete panels whe,ee office entrance statement and plaza area are being provided as shown in Exhibit "E" and "L" and "M ". 0' PLANNING, COMMISSION STAFF REPORT July 23, 1986 OR 86 -13 - Ng3senger Page 3 B. Design Review Committee, The Committee recommends approval of ne Master Plan and hase I and II with the following conditions-, Phase I 1. The northwest corner building plane treatment of Building 3 be repeated to the northeast corner. The northeast corner building plane treatment from Building i bo, repeated to the northwest corner as shown in Exhibit „D ". Staff Coament According to the developer, the mezzanine provide provideU witTiin this end unit for Buildings 1 and 3 makes ii. infeaseable to repeat that treatment to the building. The developer is proposing to wrap the landscaping around this end unit to the fi,`st roll up door area. Staff determined that this treatment meets the intent of oroviding visual relief from the Arrow Route vj,,4 for Building 3 as shown in Exhibit "o". 2. The plaza area between the norttr, side of Building 5 and the southwest side of Building 2 should be expanded, Additional pedestrian oriented facilities such as benches kiosk, raised planters be provided within this opera spcc:e ,., area. The developer has expanded the p? ~-za area as shown io Exhibit "D Phase II 3. Concrete columns, trellis and other hardscape should be added to the common plaza area. a. The south elevation of Building 13 should be improved with such trms as adding terrace planters to the office era— ,ance, adding landscaping to the southeast corner of the east elevation, adding spandrel glass and wrapping this treatment around to the east elevation, and the addition of a texture band and wrapping this treatment around to the east elevation. 5. Add texture band treatment to the south elevation of Building 12. b. Cross section between the westerly property and Building 12 be provided to show that a grade difference in the landscaping could adequately screen the large expansive wall for the northern portion of Building 12. The developer has provided such cross sections as shown in Exhibit "N311. PLANNING �:G ISSIt1N STAFF REPORT July .,23, 1986 DR 86 -13 — Messenger Page 4 7. All texturized pavement should b2 of interlocking brick p�•:Irs for the entire Master plan. 8. Full material samples of the proposed roof screen should be submitted for City planner and approval. Staff Wanent: The developer has agree! to and incorporated most ot the r'ecommendations to the site plan and elevations. However, the developer is requesting for Planning Commission discussion regarding the required textured ba,ad along the south elevation for Buildings 12 and 13. The developer would like to eliminate this texture band. The developer indicated that the two gradations es the grey color band along with the building plane articulation at 0c office entrance would provide adequate visual interest, while adding a texture band would introduce too many elements to the building. staff recommends that a texture band be provided for the south elevations g, Buildings 12 and 13, consistent with the past recommendation ,,, o. Design Review Committee. Phase III 9. The Committee stated that the future DeveloPment`Review for Phase III should address the following recommendations: a. The driveway between the north side of Building 9 and the .south side of Building 8 should be changed to a landscaped open space area to provide a centralized plaza area. Additional pedestrian oriented facilities should be provided within this plaza area. b. The buildfng plane treatment on the southwest corner of Building 9 should be repeated to the southeast corner. c. The southwest corner of Building 8 and the northwest corner of Building g should be stepped back in order to open up the plaza area. d. The south elevation of Building 11 should also have the same building plane treatment as Building 9 since it has the public view from 9th Street. C. Technical Review Committee; Normally, the related Parcel Map would be to rwar ed for PI -ning Commission review concurrently with this Develof.,�,aent review. However, the developer has not completed all items necessary to provide an acceptable method of disposing of drainage from the PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF P,EPCIT July 23, 1986 j OR 86 -13 - Messenger 9 Page 5 s development. Therefore, staff has withheld the Parcel Map from Planning Commission review until all off -site drainage facilities have been resolved as impostd by the State Map Act. A condition requiring that such items be completed prior to issuance of any permits for this project has been included'` in the Resolution. Overhead utilities exist on the opposite side of the Arrow Route frontage, the property side of Vineyard Avenue frontage and the property side of 9th Street frontage. It is recommended that the applicant be required to pay an in -lieu fee equivalent to one -half t�7 the established cost of undergrounding the Arrow Route frontage. In addition, it is recommended that the applicant underground all the electric lines less than 66 kv and the telecommunication lines along the 9th Street frontage and all electrical lines less than 66 kv along the Vineyard Avenue frontage. The 66 kv electrical lines along Vineyard Avenue shall remain in place. D. Environmental Assessment:; Staff has completed the nvironmenta l - Chec 1-s an has determined that the development e` of this project may expose people or property to water related hazards such as flooding. A drainage study is required to determine the mitigation measures: to alieviate the potential problem of flooding on site to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. As a result of Phase 11 development, 10 mature Eucalyptus trees would have to be removed. The developer should mitigate the removal of these trees by replacing them with a new Hindrow per City Standards (tucalyptus Maculatta, 6 gallon size at 8 feet on center), along the west property boundary of Phase II. Therefore, Staff has determined that there will not be a significant impact in this case be-cause the mitigation measures required have been added to the Conditions of Approval. If the Planning Commission concurs with these findings, issuance of a yegative Declaration would b;, appropriate. Is III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the General Plan and the IndUSEFial Specific Plan. The project, w}.th the added mitigation measures, will not cause significant adverse environmental impact. In addition, the proposed use, building design, site plan for Phase I and II and the Master Plan together with the recommended Conditions of Approval, are in compliance with the Industrial Specific Plan and all other applicable provisions of the City Standard. D —.5 { PLANNING 'CiIbLn AOR ST., 16F REl3CJRT July 23, 1086 6R 86 -13 - Messenger Page 6 IV. RECOMHEN99TION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commjn ;sign up o t e requirements of providing texture band fer the south elAvations of.Buiidings 12 and 13: If the Commission concurs with the findings, issuance -of a Negative Declaration and appro4aj of Development Review 86 -13 would be in order. Resp `fully s Brad Buller City Planner BB:NF:dak Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map , Exhibit "B" - $fti V.tilization Map Exhibit "C" - +,;aster'•?lan Exhibit "D" - Detailed Site Pla(t'for Phase I Exhibit "E" Detailed Site Plan "i,or Phase II 'thibit "F" - Conceptual Grading PIvn for Phase I, Exhii.1 t. "G" - Conceptual GraO4 ,g plan for Phase II ExhW* t "N" - Cross Sections Exhibit "i" - Landscape Plans Exhibit "J" Perspective View from Arrow Route - Phase I Exhibit "K" - Elevations for Phase I Exhibit "E." - Perspective View fr-z!n gth Street - Phase II Exhibit '7.i" - Elevations for Phase II Exhi bi t "N" Perspective View of Building Exhibit ",0'° - . -,e Removal Permit Application Exhibit; "P" Proposed Parcel Map 5972 Resolution of Approval with Standard Conditions t J '1 � d rag F(C, (ii -2 sub; 3 l v CITY OF ITFrvf: d TC ,o cucAMO,�TG, �rl , -fir 1UNNING DIV S;OF"�i """"� EXHU . rr: _ sc.Au:.— �_ MOM" I COMWENGw. OLDS 1b (,` .. `jam -_ _.•. -. � ! Iuu a' �1 � Vy6' t� i 1 '• t Iuus 1. ro �� vLCUt� S sL.u.� NORTH CITY or T T ITEiYI RANCHO CLCA:II�I(ONGA, PLAhtI`�1IP�,�G DIVLSION EXHIBITS. -.. _,SCALE., Li �w: I]` a .l Q 3 s : s If H1 i I If x CL Q oa �w aim 0 Wa W w= z k< a i >3 s 6 el a It it —`l t I\ 3. k i f W I 1 F r i�I �M aarAaHin - � =1 UPw a .. u.na.a. .nx au a.•.au a lh'l.fi.sswunu 4 us = - - S x z LU o d ^ ij pMp Q R 0 ¢ _ d "'Y W �a { z UA m = �. w w ...� S o s_ � s: s:. " w u e z V - ° W ° YY RIOT •OINJA1 0. 5 3 r R O +� • N �s E lip 3 1 4 3 W w W ] 3 W w < x yw v r 1 f i i 1 �s E lip 3 1 �w auvRao��v Z raosrvpay •V. iMO..nw�� G � t ' a °o lu t r 4 i� a: i i W � a . ri 1:4WU � Y3MG7. 4 UA p O `c E p 2 F : N W t J V F p C Y a y' U sE� 4 t ■i Q LL i i k•t� J Lu 2i !f1 ` gL a 8 - Ci�� ti W} v — U) �% w 3• .. F y o LU N = t r 4 i� a: i i W � a . ri 1:4WU � Y3MG7. 4 UA p O `c E p 2 F : N W t J V F p C Y a y' U sE� 4 t vvyd ss3Ntsn 1N3KLSRANI HIZONZISSUI vommyono oHouvio v )s ICIVSID I'V(Ud3DNO3 NVIdLuNs lf 15H Am Y'41/77/ 4 ul US w go 'Nair iw tic IN t3 O O O ANVdWOO J.N3WIS3;,N1 U3DN3SS3W %Hyd Ss3NIsn9 VONGO Jona 0142Nft;b:1 NVId ONIUM IVrLLdSONOD X L LLL! YE ,4 l � I t' V� J1 �" t z F, .a 5 m 1 J1 �" t z F, .a 5 m == CC c�R w e lu ` 'M �wi I ,n m 1 o I J1 �" t z F, .a 5 m M �. �a 4) 4 + p.. v W N <}N Q 2 II{ { W 'ot r i tu tu v W t Q 2 { 'ot r i tu tu v W i I It lu Home me fi TI . 31 I HI l I El g Mr: ■ } j4$ { W in gf T O O � c H Yf yi 0 V a us LU LLI uj LU -ow •�sivcwswv :. aaarno�aa•r orwxo� �8�Y7 ■� ®- !fir C -ae .01 Cj, - a I W z 0 -T, LL O fY us ui .... ... .... Cj, - a I W z 0 -T, LL O fY us ui yt W �t L tu 47 tu W F� a $ I F z � W U a N W 0 L U A ' V LO Q V 2 C yt W �t L tu 47 tu W a $ I F z � W U ' N W L z rn ay LO 2 ' a � p a i d uu � C yt W �t L tu 47 tu �iro ai'u�aowowr��wa.. ■�� 'N+t'caitixmiwv. r�onaco�«y �vrw� y E, P a3 r s LL U j b c Q Q W N m S 4' r � 110 f e k MMIM iMMiltR .--A- < s t. o LL a a U C V 2 < 4 lYR tl a iA N i < s t. o LL a a U C V 2 < Q. iA N !Ll to to z Q (Q > ; a q w a t j: b a« •auveweiv x emu, •r aravHOH.; Oki" r W]FA Ma1Yw �M{ -ytY11 �' Q J N o yec'; I � a �.•r '[ Y !�!' � � � jam! G Ell r � 4 k} t ! y LU CO w m f � w El a lu cl)-- n W Lu t. N ° •xn. •�urt7asar � Norwrarct'r. awnu�2 _ TM. e t ; e.Amx , RA vt in i •° • � ti aM a Z Lya 0 C-0 7 0 _Z Z Z .�I CL I° LU tl *0 L �I Q F_ LL 0 Z LU it 49 W . Q 'City of Cucamonga Tree Removal Permit GENERAL INr0Rh7ATI6N •4 r Ordinance No. 37, pertaining to the preservation of trees on private property, requires that no person remove or relocate any woody plants in excess of twenty (20) feet in height and having a single trunk circumference of twenty (20) Inches or more and multi- trunks having a circumference of thirty (30) inches or more (measured twenty -four (24) inches from ground level), without first obtaining a Tree Removal Permit from the City. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT g,,ri ^ ^'e: ON OF SUBJECT SITE:. -, South East Cotner of Arrow Route & Vineyard Ave. NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF APPLICANT :_ Messenger Investment Company 1.:1,1 • . 'J"o ., C:11 ,I 16912 —A Von Karman Avenue, 'Srttine, CA 92.714 (714) 474 --1300 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PROPERTY OWNER (if other than applicant): same REASONS FOR REMOVAL (attach necessary sheets): Trees lie in the designated deyel rlpm nt- area- PROPOSED METHOD OF REMOVAL: tum s. 4' APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE: DATE: ,July_ 1 1986 _, p AWTIONAL FILING RE IREMEN *'k : Fthena ion ,hall include a plot plan indicating location of all trees to be removed and retained. ' number, and size of the trees to be removed shall be so designated. If a tree is diseased, " I :n statement from a licensed arborist stating the naiure of the disease shall be required. r;; -may ACTION Evaluation of this application IS based on the criteria on the.reverse side. ;r %! ❑ APPROVED ❑ DENIED By: Reasons: *, Date::' An approval shall not become effective until after a ten (10) day appeal period. Notification of approvaIs all ii , be given to property owners adjoining the subject property. if no appeals are received, then the permit shall x" become effective ten (10) days from the date of action. This approved tree removal permit is valid for 30 days. Should applicant failed to remove the trees within this 90 day period, a new permit shall be required r __ .....,.rN a,. - Es : •:n�,.'+hR."'Ssi': J`a<. ; (.... ..R M 9tvt n' yw[` l TO BE 00M..PLETFD BY STAFF'-'k4- 1 . Can the ties be preserved by pruning: G 2. Does the tree constlture a significant natural resource Tor the City._ MgTGCnE Eft'�plds 3. General condition of trees; !�✓� MINA C� +�_lrL1MlA�C� Z,L.:_,. <' 4 . Any safety hazards to persons, adjacent property, or utility installations. 5. Proximity of other trees in the area: 6 . Effect of tree removal on the aesthetics of the area and the public health, safety and welfare: El r • ._ .x,�... :aau, .bM,..V ,'r.t- y.... .� .: ix. Ni: .,,.,.,,.,: 7'A JOf4CtelAIGAf( Drtt¢gf4POW4f3Y w.V rA//frrWJr A x...r. N. � 1 � 4 Y 1:e alt FOR INDUSTRIAL. AND C0U- ER:l4L USE ONLY sar[r i?A/ TENTATIVE N4 PARCEL MAP NO, 9972 We 1986 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM`.INGA 6LCV�ES�1Dd¢�RN4 R COROYD¢1A16DOK Ol�34:ti SdLE r %m- lOJ D�fiar�LIHCAPxCl 0£ ¢r xay ectNataM¢coayrr: xrw:,; Oc ciLlfOnyrA, AC.tCS YI.,:L DrrucveR D.wAicrl- MGSSL NCIR WvfxrMfNT CYCRiSLLy l.WnrrACG CO /ill�M v4y KAMAN AVr y JCiACV r WALtrfO.trN IRVINE., :AL1C lGilA. f!l <rti P4t!WRWIR13Vnt 1pp¢ 'i (14) 1304 .. -wccx C lLGC¢ ayr Ii ATTN- JO.lir wyC.I:cwIS AIOiC.KML RO.f A x...r. N. � 1 � 4 Y 1:e alt N4 •� :.7rA.,.r . � v's....+ ^icxmcaq 4 � . 1 Ara LYATrA: ARROW I � � CL rwi sNSUrt K• .fH .R I. t ArAxefrratllnrr v PARCEL I QY ."....1..T1. Y+ .N1.M a 4 ' PARCLL t PARCEL 3 .e ee a A3' IN Nom" —Ti�� l.41: ? D Ir.UC'- Yf-'AL pp TA:, srF•I. 6 ' 4 q� I „W .J UT7t1f1E5375TlNO �- LfJG171G.iYiR✓ANU:RLF�NLOL1)r r+msurrwicr¢ w� ��AUArcr.Kwr..�wrr,,,,¢r arsr IRW r+r•t'1'nr irrlru _ RG.,.O.r�Ilf�l• rbRrr r. �., i+ � � yYR'oriwwn srArR{ ee�rAweNn tc..r.rYResn.cr arrrir RAfLNerAKJr,¢IVa . orO a�r°aK ��I�s r1sA! r rsrraw !Or t¢�s�QJ�', w�e9wiwluut+t.:VSrtx�.[E 1� JEfRYI vRrAVrrleua l °' { N4 ...•„ 1'•i0o� rI LEGEND f.. AIOiC.KML RO.f Jo�nnwr r vwsGr Abe Mr cow /O+/e0lR/AVJR iwsrnlq�itrr saoarvrv.+yrrv.wwx� � /ef /rACYMAAOfAR1r/¢flDA'AMOIi Nvrw+m +AVRrrrsarraarA.� aWa7raW rRSfD rN AR: w rr _ �i.��e_ �rAftl ARAOY..I.X'rE K• .fH .R I. t ArAxefrratllnrr v PARCEL I QY ."....1..T1. Y+ .N1.M a 4 ' PARCLL t PARCEL 3 .e ee a A3' IN Nom" —Ti�� l.41: ? D Ir.UC'- Yf-'AL pp TA:, srF•I. 6 ' 4 q� I „W .J UT7t1f1E5375TlNO �- LfJG171G.iYiR✓ANU:RLF�NLOL1)r r+msurrwicr¢ w� ��AUArcr.Kwr..�wrr,,,,¢r arsr IRW r+r•t'1'nr irrlru _ RG.,.O.r�Ilf�l• rbRrr r. �., i+ � � yYR'oriwwn srArR{ ee�rAweNn tc..r.rYResn.cr arrrir RAfLNerAKJr,¢IVa . orO a�r°aK ��I�s r1sA! r rsrraw !Or t¢�s�QJ�', w�e9wiwluut+t.:VSrtx�.[E 1� JEfRYI vRrAVrrleua l °' { _ ,. "pfd` .i ,, }J�� . ;�. }� , j..,;ce f,., ,,$�w N� .. k '� + °9 �' �V; �^! t RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHD CUCAMONGA PLANUNG COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 86 -13 FOR A 26 ACRE MASTER PLAN AND PHASE I AND II DEVELOPMENTS CONSISTING OF 7 LIGHT MANUFACTURING BUILDINGS AND 2 WAREHOUSE DISTRIBUTION BUILDINGS LOCATED AT THE EAST SIDE OF VINEYARD, BETWEEN ARROW AND 9TH STREET IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIALIRAIL SERVED DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 25th day of June, 1986, a complete applicatijn was filed by Messenger Investment Company for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 23rd day of 3uly, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above - described project. follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planring Commission resolved as E_ SECTION 1: That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Industrial Specific Plan and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and 3. That the ^roposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions tf the Industrial Specific f ' Plan; and 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditicns applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially inj rious to properties or improvements; in the vicinity. 411 SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environmenTor expose people or property to water related hazards. A drainage study has been required as a mitigation measure. Therefore, a Negative Declaration is issued on July 23, 1986. SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 86 -13 is approved subject to the folld'0 g con3'itions and attached Standard Conditions: „!4: ,, Pt 4G Comm S' S,tok PESaLUTION 1986 OR 86 -13 - Messenger Page 2 PLANNING DI.VISIONt Phase 1: t 1. Additional pedestrian oriented facilities such as benches, kiosks, raised planters,, and other handscape shall be provided to the main plaza in front of Building 3 and to the secondary plaza between Buii'.dings 2 and 5 (Phase I). Detailed design shalt`' be submitted for Design Review Committee approval prior to submitting for plan check. Detailed plans of the pedestrian oriented facilities shall be included in the detailed landscape and irrigation plan to be submitted for Planning Division review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 2. Concrete columns, trellis, and other hardscape shah be added to the common plaza area within Phan, I1 development. Designs of the plaza area shall be submitted for Design Review Committee approval prior to submittin; for plan check. Detailed plans of the plaza area shall be included in the detailed landscape and irrigation plans to be submitted for Plsmninq Oivision review, and approval prior to issuanc, of building permits. 3. The south elevation of Bri.ding 13 shill be improved with terraced planters tax the office entrance, adding landscaping to the southeast corner of the east elevation, adding spandrel glass and wrapping this treatment around to the east elevation, add textured band_ and wrapping this treatment around to the east elevation. Revised plans shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to submitting for plan check. 4. A textured band treatment shall be added to the south elevation of Building 12. Revised plans shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to submitting for plan check. S. Texturized pavement ideatifyin6 pedestrian paths shall be provided at all driveway entrances and shall be of interlocking brick pavers, exposed aggregate or a combination of them subject to the City Planner's review and approval. Full material sampless shall be submitted for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. c —11 PLANNING GO�lI5SI0N RESOLUTION July 23, 1986 ; DR 86 -13 - Messinger Page 3 6. All screening shall be architecturally integrated wi tl' the building design and where possible a roof parapet wall shall be used to screei► roof mounted equipment. If roof screening is needed, it shall be of an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design, x.11 material samples of such roof screenina /shall be submitted for City '`ranner review and approval Vior to issv..Ace of building permits. 7. Special landscaping treatment such as intensifying landscaping, specimen size trees, and accent trees shall be provided along Arrow Route, 9th Street and at all project entrances and building entrances. 8. Special landscaping treatment shall be provided to the landscaped area along the south elevation of Buildings 12 and 13, such as undulating mounding, rockscape, stepped retaining walls, and intensified landscaping. 9. Dense landscaping shall he provided along the west property boundary (Phase 3) to screen and provide visual relief to the east elevation of Building 12. It shall include new . ndr-ovs of Eucalyptus Maculata 5 gallon size at 8 feet on center, specimen size trees, accent trees and appropriate shrubs and ground cover. 10. Development Review, for Phase III shall incorporate the following conditions; a. The driveway between the north side of Building 9 and sbuth side of Building 8 shall be changed to landscaped open areas to provide a centralized plaza area. Additional pedestrian oriented facilities shall be provided within this plaza area, b. The building plane treatment on the southwest corner of Building 9 shall be repeated to the southeast corner. c. The southwest corner of Building 8 and the nortnwest corner of Building 9 shall he, stepped back in order U .open up the plaza area. d. 'the south elevation of Building 11 shall also Is have the same building plane treatment as Building 9 since it has the public view from 9th Street. , 0 -32- PLANNING CoWiSSIaN July OR �'— Page Messenger -- ` `\ e. A continuous hedgerow to screen the parking area that fronts on Arrow Highway shall bi 11. Reciprocal easement for the use of the common plaz:l area for phase It devalopaient shall be deiineated an ` the Parcel Map or provided by shall be approved by the City Attorney AAd recorded concurr2ntly with the Parcel Map. 12. The Uniform Sign Program for the entire Master Plan permits. shall be provided frr City Planner re%!faw and 13. Unif"i ) street furnfiares such as trash receptacles, planter boxes:, and bike racks shall be submi�ted for City Planner approval prior to issuance of building I. croy / within percen-�, Cross slopes. within P;ivld areas for truck � nm grades for the rail ' within the dock area shall not en;ecd 2percent. 3. The h d planter area along the nast -'-'- ty boundary for Phase I shall move ba,� location �tv the � of the first roll up door for creating the required — turning radius of the share6'urivovay anpros-�` 4. A final grading plan incorporating the c*odit1vna of approval shafl be submitted for review and approval prior to issuance of any permits. ENGINEERING DIVISION* l. A reciprocal driveway with a minimum 26-foot width shall be provided between Phase III and the property to the north uf Phasm IIl priur to Ys* '-- ~' bui1dYnp psxits. — 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for disposal of m drainage � acceptance Drainage easement as required by the City pa-t. -'~ --' shall be required prior to the issuance building' prior 7) -=` KI 13 F PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION July 23, 1986 DR 86 -13 Messenger Pkge 5 3. Overhead Utilities: a. Arrow 'Route: The. applicant shall pay, prior to issuance of build-,4,4z permits, a fee in -Lieu of undergrounding overhea& electrical lines less than 66 kv and telecommrunicatioa lines along the north side of Arrow Rote. Said fee shall be one -half of the front foot cost of undergrounding. b. 9th Street. Existing overhead electrical lines less than.66 kv and telecommunications lines on the north side of 9th street rom the first pole east of the easterly property line to the first pole, west of Vineyard Avenue shall be placed underground prior to issuance of an occupancy permit for any development. c. `,vineyard Avenue Cxisting overhead electrical lines less than fib kv on the east side of Vineyard Avenue from the first 'aole north of the northerly property line to the first pole south of 9th Street shall be placed underground prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit for any development. d. The Developer is eligible for reimbursement of one -half the standard ir. -lieu fee colleted from future developments av they occur an the opposite side of 9th Street and Vineyard Averue. 4. Notice of Intent to Join the Proposed Median Island Landscape District shall be filed with the city Council prior to issuance of building permits. 5. The existing cueb and gutter along A,,row Ro4te shall �e moved and replaced at the standard 36 -foot from center line. 6. No orivewaye are permitted rrom Vineyard Avenue. 7. An easement ?or a reciprocal driveway to include accass, maintenance, and reconstruction provisions (30 feet in width and 100 feet in depth) shall be provided for the drivr',!ay at the east era of the project on Arrow Route prior to issuance of building permits. a —�t� a 21 PtAt�rlxNC'bii S, . UN RESOLUTION J 41 23, 1486' OR 86 -13 - ;,irtetsenger a Page 6 8. ` Off -si to drainage facilities shall be designed and related easements obtained, as necessary to convey flows from the development wo an acceptable dis:pusal location as approved by the City En ineer prior t 9 p o issuance of any, permits (foundatioris, gra,;din -g, building. etc.) for the projopt. Construction of the facilities shall ;�e, comdl eted prilor to the occ�ipancy of -an`. of t'te. 'b Y j, uil d�nOso The , Devei�oper r, shall be eligible for 'reimbursement of any cost in excess of the standard drainage acreage fee incurred 4" as nece,�sary 'to construct any portion of the facility designated as -a, City Master Plan line. � 1. °„ APPROVED AND ADOPTED TkIS 23rd DAY-OF -JULY, 1986. 'PLANNINC COMMISSION OF THE PITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA E " BY: k- ennis ,,. ou airman ATTEST: nraa aurier, Deptr y ecre ary 1, Brad Butler, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the lrty of Rancho Cucamonga, do h (,reby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced„ passed, and adopted by the Planning Comnission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commi .'lion held on the 23rd day of July, 1986, by the follow -ig vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: t� 35 .J G 0 tt Z R_ 4J U a_ .O i U it I... 2 c L i O pcp AC'Cy OT pp n C E...m NOO ANy� E14 a°. Cn d A =CN? o d° a.O no YGy d. €_Nr OCYL 'O s.y2 E OO�c yd. nP. Gd u q.. V O S L w E L 9 Y y 9Md3n Gpd'� 6 '2Y. v+dT. a ON. NEG n TC A q 00 al d.Nd r C Ol �E^b"a,c r CCga m0� �6anYL vM c6.{• Lys. N Cd T Uy O, m NEyEE 9p 55 O.O n�u C NL EcE°E N wq 6ap°p.,, ma duw M y U E C N r u 3 n Y E CI L L ^ p- q • 9 c Ln ^3 iii E Od dAUt oz- _ df°� °NyC W E d� >NA COu -33 N q= r L. RE d I 2 E 0 O f H 6 �cN r c A m J 4 N ` D w z Y _ t Itt ° .1 L So c � La. ^vu Eyo. gg E� W �y0 Y N. NVYnOY S .-u EEN2 uu� q Y G + C O y d o C N G U d ^O E a Y+ f yid N. �' Oj�ij Yd�O� p N *u- pOp°a` J C� � S9 NOVp. .OTgN y O qC E ° YY d�Nd�d U 6 4 A ydC++ .•ddC Nw y <0.3 C Q a 1=Y 6TyNmvrrt a°i.N. 2 O E p d Ni I I n L ) 6V E f U Qi •n L l.[ S�•o.Y V NC r .O � aQ Ca -d ay'YL i� ' �, N �C, � At nHe-•n L t CA ti A 9a0� ate. nu 2 _ NydEN NN C Ec�°n yi N p Vad ° NrbLO mtC yc C>� Od =ON ua. cNC A Z rpd_ 6a 9ad Uy TC L E Ua Aya qN Np CM. GC m° A yU -° ^... �L}Sy .Nx.5 UQ vOiYY a L CQLy ACNE �� °� 020 y ?�'OL d�n y°. >LCr'•° Ly D��IITiN fT.�L nNn'.d�da AZC Ny �iL °O L Ov=a uL 'owy O.0 N uAp N +4 o u= t ay cdy ac '°y i s m T d u.2 ,xL A YOt u u0 c0a� 'O L 6 c5 9 .c L G >M-q CC NE> itl a.Nd mLN. ,c O L:°c a.ci c aoL m. =o` AO a...•A �. ^.Lt"� �unC'd�.plb x' d� HAWL YC.^ xY y NN C.^. O u Vt201 C� y q NNNN9 q�v� C tp � mY yym x.-A O r� gCAN.N Nom n c W �a � q co Sm. aE aq.SL La n .�+ L'^ C y 09 .- .2,.oyn Y�im �u O� 3�tu fan N C aA� we =_ .� Una yr Eq�C c a A G'•u� ^L u2 ° cCp OOH E Ly x ON �eua a�E u aL.° x n c N� ..eY MU NSy 'tw? L,�N n.1az; hLU A >uy a L E L O�C C 6 w C V tij Iz A V N C r+ p• W Y S G C 6 F A w°+:p f O. 8 c4 Q 10 S�•o.Y V NC r .O � aQ Ca -d ay'YL °atr�yC u q YO ^yN na. �O Y A S S L t CA ti LTi c �= 3 0 6dxsv9.UyN ..• Ny U V 2 � wdPT 9d � =LL x � yN NN C Ec�°n yi N (�ee ab��u LU °AS n�"'3t� y2L ,uywyN tuaC� yc C>� Od W L L V L •� c cEaa9•�4 .14! " ^^ L Y mix v"> �Y m° A yU -° ^... �L}Sy .Nx.5 UQ vOiYY a L aQni m ^i a� .ACj 09•^a.ONVp tlA 'owy O.0 N uAp N +4 o u= t ay cdy ac '°y i s m T d u.2 ,xL A YOt u u0 c0a� 'O L 6 c5 9 .c L G >M-q A advOi u mm's^ O� d00� Lp.n N �o. t d tCNN o.aa L A d NN�y °O° y mp ~' i �u 6.c- a...•A �. ^.Lt"� �unC'd�.plb v ma cE.A OOam+ {µ�y+N.r aao cOp OU gocyc A >�rn vnLL A4 `. u'`�.�1 ;a n -c do n0 vlst .�+ L'^ C y 09 .- .2,.oyn Y�im �u O� 3�tu fan N C aA� we Z-42-5 U qc > .� Una yr Eq�C rC g rmp ^_x G'•u� ^L u2 ° cCp OOH z 8 Ny � 6c°a.LL a'�'pL V o=Nar.0 a�E +L+4S diy~•N E to ..eY MU NSy 'tw? L,�N .O„N 4 hLU A >uy a L E L O�C C C ai cv •^ v L E-.5 cd ONa�iu a L 4ia C,Gn v=iD F-t M04 Qruuia O�YY MCN I��nQm6 �-_:3- a lu oaC 9C L r, 01= .Ld E L y pLj nC N y .-�O y^ ,c °.rngnmCN u r ECLL N o o a u c qa a a °r k '° ° �a r °v L o d3gw ° w my •+� a Eu y U G1 d� •°-9u LOS b0 uo. ++ O �^ Ya¢ nN y L a,°. ° ° ^NO'a,,Ti e. na- .�- N E y"' oyy^ ^ Ay r9.JS6y Cy ALa Er ,�. d _N Nr C O O'^ ynNOOwo �L v N u L YALE «C. c d p Y O E L nL c a °Ar Nw u •^� L La,•y b L y 0.va Y� ° C C aL w �vQiU ccur ^ y t yWL ^xl EE EM 5C ,.. .Y. �"Y d bdd 6 OL> flV6 n. °i� »MV� �T = �� O� o y D N U v1 LOL Or dyy b^ �'p`u Emu ca. N ti c c� s un ^' r in y —9.2 1 N "" ra uN ndt i'!- oD NO A O ~»uqN lu oaC 9C L r, floc aC y L9 A wn Eu v 9N Uyr� i� TC YNaL �G61 �°i3+ 4wgn oyy^ ^ Ay r9.JS6y Cy ALa Er rnL+. _N Nr C O O'^ w w y o nt q ^ y t Y wTa Fvc- CZ L� E^w" b^ �'p`u a'nEp= ui °roq Eu'a �^ u ;i um yr u "" ra uN ndt i'!- oD NO A O ~»uqN Z� r �LCQ UN�N p'Op _ CE t1 q Lo 7z nu Ea °ap'9 Ltc n'c u n LuA .-.o 6rwp 4.o w.m ZGV pp L QL1 QwSA Wn Lam~ o pyln i.r •6yN 11 T M 0 'z. 41 U Cl) .In S_ C 11 Na C 3 . '94-21 E W c L O YmE d¢n ^ v C LSO^ 7 t ^ Z SV u y u iv iE. � q ySY O1NS Y6 rt ywc 1 {per Np gnj1 n09 V Tq rt d^ cil cL N N,o� Lu c t oY doq °c'EOE n, c.qa 1 Cam.... Nq >yT qnL W � L ^QL =Y V Cd tid.�0 cOL o cn ^ar 6`60 h .g cQ L'V Y E >ES' N y= 'L a°Sr040y NHE V N� Y G^ NYC Y y AT 3 .+r -."z L nL EY °i •w gaFLi�'S GG ^' nnd.c �C'L na0 UC >N U, L>,Od rQi CY Ny XN M-6L 2LLLNL 1C^N m . & Z . m�W �b96 = - Oq.r -O� 4E,aY� yNILL Yc .c - LN 00 a .q LL:dre W W u y NZ d ^ 4d L Y d. E'a c q�u�Q Lq W qYy b aL d L vdAgn �� �Yu OILY '.- V q 2U�N O Olq dY�d 9qc Ea c SN n j G c9Y C w Y M L ^u•OU Y jr E 8 d , i� L CENq =CO. C LN Lea o Yc E c U z N c. 9 m^ TCO da auia 1- t°,r .°..Y -Y as °.'i1me °'. y. V N S N I mI �•� .. W �l m 3 [a y d6 U>r E,ce�• LU ��. 9d� �� �Lw C^ L qu c a n j w Y M L > q W� N t •q c0^. �^ y CENq =CO. C TCO G� V Ns'JC CG =u, T tT aYY L A9 V 6 E q dw U d L b°. Y°. Y N El. OT t IR L 'O Y y^aq °N d wEO m y a1Y pN« YLV .1 3, oG u o a+n u0 dqu o°-y O,nq N 4E grf CLa = q N =OT °C • 4p ^`� q Lo NSC NCR. ^ °. c u cgy.d .U. aN c NY Q.YT^ cO n. NwLL C L U ^y n � u L v ^ A O�• q q °y r- �c �y i d d O "go e O ��i' AO,LL LL d ^2 a q U T q Lq + O, C d 4 NvW . C N O 9 .Y.. A _cE A q Y c N G T:' i y u g l t c W 6 y E I a>i adi c m 3 [a tES Y vao d��asr o •d[ a — Yvo c o ° � F v n° C � a E p U Y � Y >Gi. .6 E x,� O a.•°•O YYY Lq wL p.. Q Z YL° nA d O q � 3 CY- 00~ w w� V L q q V4�.0 EN r N u� V'•' y �' ^_ p U L _ rno _ f Q 6�°rv. da M...• O YO � tC• �• -da°+ rtY n L vLi L Y t ✓. _ � N o >j Lo�E ° N C •.-o c. aG u o n�v ^ d �. � +VLq O�O�VLc V O.•.CW 4. p.p d gagY t t qY.E dt:ow nC.•. t`o z q.-••� ty ii m'a o ° ^vf n Eu ao dy orn`e u tES Y � q � °•...V o •d[ a — Yvo c o ° � C � a aT• G• 0. U Y � Y E x,� O Y L. d Opcl d OL t l M V L q q V4�.0 EN r N u� V'•' y �' wE Or C d.S tq. 000.L^ NYO Me 6y ... ^uC K .^.0 Yt• x `E oq� • �.- Y O N O LO n L vLi L Y t ✓. _ � N 6 d d O •• ^ .x• • 4yd GL OCa�J y N C E 9V t y n qn y= °qo N v v� o.^• °Y°. °y Yw ub.Y OE V O.•.CW yN V9 QA yyc�u �y pY.d QVV t`o z pNy • VdwuY Y OI a p r. •VOm G S-vV - NC a rz CNY -_Lt YbCy °Oy E . Eb Aq= 5 C NYO Me 6y u�Y ° c� Vpmd �° n4'q .° R'1 � U ..� L OE ° x ^ Y V �° �? c U y d b �� s�0• a= 4 N 6 ^ aim 9.d c •y q W adN° y q yOq N d V a �x.+ ^�.+°. O yV 9 dE� `^nL a'S n°i y xCD N� a IM C LO !}N O � pNy • VdwuY Y OI 4: lye 'L^ L .� n ;L!YdQ d € L Vz xYE Y.•^ w m •°.0 °, a0.ic nU q? nY '.� E i aN. ^� t�N L+ "°' a Y°.Or oy yY'N •` o'q" m dGaO C° E z i AY 42 c �' Y. L� �q yo °tu xw --79 '^ CY _ gg. rL •p wv x'L w n I.C. 6r� ° ^q ... c ° NL�N C °Yx u� aL 6 • -�a�0. c qa + g.L d� E �� SO OY. •••�!� LV o- - w.5 L ^ p 1 4 ^' q - ° O x..° d U q V 3 O c E p O Y -Y.. d , d U N ..L• Y W G tz NY^ r 9 A q L N X O d { WNQ LYUU �0. i:J cz SN�I LA I C Z 41 U u> a L d xaTiOL L � • boo o� Y �ad b a `oaa� .^ u n A u E ¢5 `. ya« u =aaai za r tl sib- u ms ,..,• a '° E m =o SLU qr C a tlTW ° y T u N N qC °nw QOp °Rq a�a �R i °L '_ eve °mi u �w C ^q ^y > qc.,. Rq°Y. qu u°.- 12 Z; Ni u •L ' w s.w uM c`n . . = E io. u .Z; oz:- iv � .. c wko 1Z; .� u ou x WE iE q.QLC ugstl gvY°v °.R� -w 4! xaRyl. v2y. vio c 4 ^. L a.�YL bC Y ,p n�NEA EE w O q�.m tl = 6q Bu Nd C �C d Nq r� U. ^ = L y3r•N ui QB YN v =UY' TL E C ,�b. NOW Nr� C6N« NGw�' V!'Lp A �y H u'• n GYb.Y 4V Dr WL Q Cq LL.; a 4 U •D eC V- I -1 ~ b 1 I I I � N Y « N U 4 b�Of w d qW M T'� u 2.^ W f.i n E 9 q q tl B vL� ha _ Y abi � 6 w o ^a d d ca ^ Y l C 9 O x Y S^ N p L N «A ^ Cr >N b Y � bFb b ++ b L n q Q c L tl W i o� N a °a �Y y y 2 � E� Ca o �Eb d >p Oo La a � ^ ^z �6y=c aii R N N tl N L U A q N� t. ~` N ' S qu c .^ y t N a 9 ° c U o u ..- C �t _ >o aq O EE R Nd ay E b C 0 0 N N w Ep u Cya uu Ern N E NI b � N Y O b WY i• ° 'J� L b i '• � v' ai a a• � a ° ^ r V r ° u nNy m r T 9 S C aL� L R 4 c cu L � O ic0 b i °N T9 L L x O tl O. 4 u E dNti R� 3 Ul r - LV M Y r q c2 b b �bo ♦' C... �'..� _ c E p qun qOb L u uaiL L b2 bM b 4ty wY N 4 V S vb NG Nu. �p b N V u w C. g p 6Vt .O:T L N/ L i L= C.°•. b w OY �. C C u Q q NT Y4N in- at r 4 i. V°..w y•^r L a O 4�G N N o= G f � O s j.,� N 22 21 i way �.m Tuua ° ^ VlgJ C'o d ^ sW O C ^a q �U9 p� 3 ii Na y 4 N w. L I .�,, L q0 L` Oy 4°- N L n0 ^�� YA K 4 O E _ � at 2. YZR N b uya ti C` °- Su A m 02 �~ c G O C N� o YN Oc Owy 6 - Y tTin ML qi L.O C w m V VO . per^ mtq 49 RC6 rn� �V ;W YC `L 4 YR O.Gm 00 mppNC V E.G. 9 ... I I- stir -- 46 4N J2d O b� T ^•.• ,t LO u n 1 a N -- 'CITY OF RANCHO CUCAiAONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 23, 1986 TO: Chairman and Members of the Plarning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Debr,- Meier, Assistant Planner 5`;BJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENI AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86 -14 AVLN IWEST R:; I - The develo pment of an 11,750 ' sqare oot o tce FU ding on 1.005 acres of land in the Industrial Park District ;Subarea 7) located on the east side of Haven Avenue approximately 550 feet south of Civic Center Drive - APR ZGo- `U -35. 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of site plan and building elevations and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: 1_t7r_h -- Vacant; In ustria Specific Plan, Subarea 7. Sou h - Perking lot for existing Wart Center Industrial Specific Plan, Subarea 7. East - Retail shops; Industrial Specific Plan, Subarea 7. West - Vineyard; Haven Avenue 0erlay District. ;. General Plan Designations: Project Site - In ustria ark. North - Industrial Park. Soufiu - Commerical. East - Industrial Park. WL8t - Industrial Park. D. Site Characteristics• The site has been rough graded and no str_Ef6s'es or significant vegetation exist. Haven Avenue is fully improved including parkway ;andscapirg and meandering sidewalk. II. ANALYSIS* A. General: The proposed project is within the Haver, Avenue Overlay-District and r t rf a Master Planned commercial center (K -Mart) as shown on tine attached exhibit. The site plan is cor intent with the Master Plan with the addition of a second drive approach at the north parcel line that was approved with Parcel Map 8250. Il EM P PLANNING COMMISSIN STAFF REPORT OR 86 -14 - HAVEN INVESTORS I July 23, 1986 Page L The Traffic Engine ^r has concerns in regard to the placement of the additional driveway. When Parcel Map 8250 was presented to thF Commission for approval, a driveway separate from the existing twos which served the K -Mart center was requested and granted. This additional driveway was justified by the applicant on the basis of a hardship which would be experien -,d by a predominantly restaurant develop p.nt if only the center's vain driveway were available. At that time, there were no other local developments or proposals using indirect access to offer as an example of an alternate scheme. Now the Virginia Dare Center and the proposed Harry C's restaurant serve as examples of business developments where driveways adjacent to each use are not necessary. There are many such examples in neighboring communities as well. While Parcel 3, which could still be developed as a restaurant, is more isolated than, for example Harry C's, it would be evident to prospective customers that any access to the commercial center would provide access to the restaurant(;,) along Haven Avenue. Thus, the necessity of a third driveway between Arrow and Civic Center Drive is not clew-, and the Commission may wish to delete it from the proposal. B. resign Review Committee: At the July 3, 1986 Design Review Committee meeting, the applicant presented revised building elevations. They recommended approval of the project, stating that the architecture is consistent with Haven .Avenue Overlay District Architecture Guideline,, in that it reveals a high - quality progressive, sophist ;cated, and urban style of development. As an additio,:a? a:,%e, signage for the building was discuss -_, and the Committee indicated a preference for use of a simple, non - illuminated material for tenart identification only. C. Technical Review ommittee: The Tevhn, -al Review L.Aittee has reviewed the project and determined that with recer•nended conditions of approval the project is consistent dith the applicable standards and ordinances.. In addition, overhead utilities exist along both sides of Haven Av(tnue fronting the project. Since the property frontage is less than 300 feet, the Engineering Division recommends that an in -lieu fee be pail" for undergrounding electric lines less than 66KV and telecorimunication lines along the g- operty frontage. „';c in- lieu fee would amount to one -half the cost of undergrounding ,equired both sides of the street, D. GrafpL Committee: The Grading Committee has approved the concepta grading grad ng plan subject to an approved final grading plan pr .' to the issuance of building permits, P PLANNING COMM ISSION STAFF REPORT t OR 86-24 - HAVEN INVESTORS I July 23, 1986 Page. E EnrironmWtal Assessment: Upon review Part I of the Initial &ty and co"mp"le ti`on of Part II of the Environmental checklist, staff has found no significant = impacts relatedl! try, tie development of the proposed office buildinq - -.:. III, FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is co:isistent with the industrial peci is and' the General Alan. The project will not be detrimental ' to adjacent properties or cause significant environmental impacts:, In addition, the proposed site plait and building design, together with the recommended conditions, are in compliance with the Industrial Area Specific Plan an(-,' - City Standards;. IV. RECOMMENDATION* Staff recommends approval of Development,Revievr 8 - 4, through the adoption of the attached Resolution and Conditions of Approval and issuance of a Negative Declaration, Res ctfully mitted, r Brad Buller =' City Planner BB : DM: ko Attachment-q-- Exhibit "Al" - Location Map Exhibit "B" Site Plan t Exhibit "C" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "D" - Building Elevations Exhibit "E" - Enlarged Details Resolution of Approval with Cond -4cns SITE !UTILIZATION PLAN rITY OF RANCHO CUCA.t�TC]NGA PLANNM DrVISnN F-4 11', V �,I Mani F-XH!BIT= } ,S':t LE: i s -. r 4 Il i "ITT. f i41- a r a �— DMTAIL ISI'TE PLAAM l I�zOIYI�i'I CITY CAF RANCID CLVA. -MO -NGA Trrr p-: P�'iNh''\r, DNISM' EXHIBIT A SCAT E: CITY OF RAINCHO CLICATNUNGA PLANNING DNgSnN s' CITY OF RAINCHO CLICATNUNGA PLANNING DNgSnN L A'GAP^ArrHL'g Ap- jr_ANUS OELOP[SRCNE iGUSTATA OICKSOVIUA ANTARCTICA: PAR1'WENGCISSU?T T171CUSp:QATA SAGIM:I SUSULATA VINCA (lMMOA IMPATIEN.Q PITTOS.PORUM TUEIRA 'WHI4ELEi71' EECALLONIA FRACESI V' V NORTH . rrE,N.il - TnU-.. IV _� LEGEND .. EIIISTING CHORMA EPECICSA. I EMSTIN6 ALIMUS RHOMMIFOLIA 1 'r reLwA 6,4.LC MANA jf (j CNOFISIA SPECICSA j' R•- ++QA•NU; ACERIFCtJA ! LICAUUTAMSAR STYRACIPLUA L A'GAP^ArrHL'g Ap- jr_ANUS OELOP[SRCNE iGUSTATA OICKSOVIUA ANTARCTICA: PAR1'WENGCISSU?T T171CUSp:QATA SAGIM:I SUSULATA VINCA (lMMOA IMPATIEN.Q PITTOS.PORUM TUEIRA 'WHI4ELEi71' EECALLONIA FRACESI V' V NORTH . rrE,N.il - TnU-.. IV _� 3 a DMTAIL Al \ ^- k r ENTRY r=NLAPrr= vit =w l NORTH { �F CITY OF ITc�i '.. RANCHO CUCAMONGA Tr,,, LF—: PLOTIIIIVG DIV75iCXN EXHI �SCUD "°"' 1. w RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 86 -14 LOC)�TED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HAVEN AJENUE SOUTH OF CIVIC CENTcR DRIVE IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 30th day of May, 1986, a iomplete application was " filed by Haven Investors I for review of the above- devcribed project; and WHEREAS, on the 23rd day of July, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning ` Cow.Assion held a meeting to consider the above- cescri�bed project. *: NOW, THEREFOR% the Rancho Cucamonga Planninl� follows: Commission resolved as SECTION 1: That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the k; objectives of the Industrial Specific Plan and the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed use is in accord w9th the objective of the Development Code and the purposes .1 of the district in which the site is located; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the aoplicable provisions of the Development Code; and 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts in the environment an tat a Negative Declaration is issued on July 23, 1986. SECTION 3: That Development R-view No. 86 -14 is approved subject to the following conditions and attached Standard Conditions: Planning Division: 1. Pi °nvide landscaping along south property line compatible with existing landscape theme along south side of main driveway entrance. 2. Relocate trash enclosure to a location not directly in front of a window, and use exterior materials t�iat are architecturally compatible with the building. f :I PLANNING COMMISSION RE'SOLOTIO No. ' z DR 86 -14 - HAVEN INVESTORS I JUTy 23, 196_ s Page 2 �' ;; Engine_ erinr�Divisian: L Notice of Intent to join the proposed Median Island LandSca,ie District shall be filed with the City Cauncil prior wo issuance ce, building permits. ! 2. haven Avenue Overhead Utilities - Prior to the issuance., building permits, the _Applicant shall pay a ._fee in -lieu of undergrounding overhead electric lines less than 66KV and telecommunication lines on both sides of 'Haven Avenue fr14M the northerl the southerly property 14,.;e Said 'fee shall Dane amuunt'tr -h l'f eto, front foot cost ofundergrounding for both sides c% the-:,treet„ ' 3. Provide a right-tbrn pucket entering the proposed dr;ve at the north property line, minimum 6 feet in width and 50 feet i+n length. APPROVED AND ADOPT6 TlHIS 23RD DAY OF JULY, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF.THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC,AMONGA BY: `: Dennis L. Stout, Chairmen Aft ATTEST: " &rad Butler, 9eputy Secretary I. Bred Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution Was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning CoW ,lion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission bald on the 23rd day of July, 1986, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: :I N 4C PT =a O.x N..6 a UdA SdNq =Q. O� O��DC GTt°16V C"� cXrO r E�OUa~i. -.9� �i10. Y.q ��rG -9 uu4 oS Gy NF^ C °V>> C d N t1 YY wnLd Ga L Cu J,,,�U .� 1 4pn sg NF •.�.'�,� V .0 ^� N LLd � EM��t �+y� 3 �c u9�. ..°•�. �up 4dy�q Gy yfuwx. ,. ac u ° V uy cNq°10 v.. n.n s dL.'G,:O a',pG o.. _ x«= X83 �oa�c o.••�,a � Vq �� .•d � €°. a - ie 9,^r .c+'ax°. _o nn •nuw �°,, '".N dr °s °con Goa ,�u O'^Ed W 1Y.4 >CO�yt 9 ^1 4AViK M dG� ^A� Arc.".. era NU.'p`vd zc—r s L�y'.+ aA� �cw��w d E a Lo�N1 gWrU nTYC �� bOGI q Y-da.y .Quu £ .•.d. Y d E� ppCb ��'dy Nd. °SOY O ,V r N d.0 3 N 3 ° E d 4 g Y e b' N Y d U —� Y N.T 6 r.UA.693u� C t.>•1 S t .CL d G,r ^=Gn 11 L+� A S.. rOC•lfCY++G �Vu} C Lnt1 N 1p p a ry � N 0 0 ° ° G F F f 4 V m 6 _ Y i=• M_ .°1q GNLL d r 0 O � .mod � M � ems^ AELm.. >my9pc E� r• u w .o c 5 L u' i• H u U�= o m o"uu 4LG L c.adua. Nas _ Vf } pG'; YM 4. Oadir�LiR °. 9 L c= N d —r+ N Y Y 6t Y E i _n > t V 6m�,. C. r� b�yf�MTYfi nom. u n•- > 9 �. ,n o x 6 J `A r'• `1 Rl ij u N •n i d -J M'd r N 'O O.Li02 d0� q N ut uri;?ei ..., r �V'4 NVV°.+ i y4� C LA 9.0 tt �aa NL' v ar Y Cw`.t �TQTG i xwii nom. NH �O'Y CV T G u a �d Gs 5n. PtJ � a �tT L � d w E u S �O H C^ x° x C L O ny d LA I M� Eau C as �°.Pq Y 4V. O .3 H p q U U Loy .c E x 'S u O � N E v a9 Y 6L y q.p w. u CI C C p QY NLdr � � O�L d_ N� + n NN p CO E-7; ^ G Nry.T @V U p L ggqi d _ NON wi0. �O dH P.3'�a 05srya dNb x23', C .a B L r� doom ci. ^c _ Equ CL 'qC G O NWR -N na. rN}Yp ..-3 aNY ydq yar% Q x y p Lqp O y S n `� E> Y Z �� puT q� 4 N q. q GY dY^ 4 pyC O 3„ •^ � a cc as cT.. W i- yy~ u pn rE6° `O xL-�AadEiL„G,N +"'G. cyp may.. epu.•O.q q�u Eq�p }}i 4 ° ZLC Cq O1 g 0Ar Nym O dLQ`I -Uw..� dip O U~i .P. Y Ca+. y�y U `O•-pp ^' t1 Y'p y Yp {aNW qa p.�d. C _a L. dO'O',C W.V y"url H LI�NL� PO. m. NREE q # ODUd. ~� d `LN yd' 3CN E aL O'OG �N L' ULY 2 6 L N!.' "' °d y •• ° N W> C Q R 60 EE L V. C t C 3aVU I E`Edao�L n b'L OR •6 EM4� r d�� H pp NN`.+ -SrXO CONNrOCi v wE.� W -9—= 4•L 6. °.° uui44 -J M'd r N 'O O.Li02 d0� q N ut uri;?ei ..., r �V'4 NVV°.+ i y4� C LA 9.0 tt �aa NL' v ar Y Cw`.t �TQTG i xwii nom. NH �O'Y CV T G u a �d Gs 5n. PtJ � a �tT L � d w E u S �O H C^ x° x C L O ny d LA I M� Eau C as �°.Pq �i '•q CO -a�i «-c L4 y up � jyN � 0 4 A�u Litp wNEN v uY >q .dc uu u Ny�b. �,:Od E^p d doom ci. ^c _ Equ CL 'qC G O NWR -N na. rN}Yp ..-3 aNY ydq yar% an 3TA -QT aq c C L >a d u a L w Via. _ cc as cT.. W i- yy~ u pn La L u5 c 'rU J_N O V En 9 O •�y 'qtS q Lb -� O' C d � LgrY L -0 X021 au O �J Y 3y ... .0 dt°s:. �f'•' OR 6b6,Cq ra Nf /�-L NQ` 4.° -tx.0 t'1vq 6V JYa p, °day m w -J M'd r N 'O O.Li02 d0� q N ut uri;?ei ..., r �V'4 NVV°.+ i y4� C LA 9.0 tt �aa NL' v ar Y Cw`.t �TQTG i xwii nom. NH �O'Y CV T G u a �d Gs 5n. PtJ � a �tT L � d w E u S �O H C^ x° x C L O ny d LA I M� i M t. m0. q O^ nq t Y1= d Od CUL ` T u! d 9 l -.� D•u C L� qu b 1 L L O k N > !N a _ •q � ° d R V 3q n E ..rte O i dq >.�. ,C GFO n dyfT go y cuN vm � m-- °j^" c C OG uo9E.1m yl q •O Y O L d K q L 4 R L u d u N g Y G q C� u rr'a r u C- m Q1s d a° n o, cf q,fA,o da co fn o co. qLU N b C h G b. L.. W N I N p. O • d d M g q T 4> b a d N w L W» V4y ^Dt O^ t > > Y .O WtYN W- Y 6 h OV" Yn�q u Y d.��' 'Y GxL .E. W NCR pLLNb C A7Q at q'Y O A.y q.O •+ d E� q ec 'L'° u�yf ^NR G i �L ^bbQ z N [ F. l\p O 1 p r c' o a N er. �... `' d J �: C 0. �� N 3 w O .G° L L� R•a '0.' V. Teli� C G.•`. � W C °.EO 'n b. L wuw «O 54 °v yN LLd �� otLLw ® aC V ' L � a 6 ° 4CC > y j ^ L` � 0,, AN u Y r N a EE C'iSu -.4 L q� K Lxn O6Y V °iwMO b � m `Y CO Yu o. Z Y6 no X, � •Ld O.�LWb d« 96W u GN Oq E a= O q L z '-W "z Gd . J r O �1N OC ^ V u �� jpro` o Y1- d a°C EL �• q�N.Od V nbG b Y V% U , C C V °-f� �u , r ^ 0 b N d 0 q o d�.EENS ea «q 0 ^.0 NOOWm 4OV WO E ^ W ti T> C S ^..a. E7Z; Y .Qu t°.O 4 > H 6N 4V QO hOw +q 4C W4 4 N 6M %LdY L i M L�) 'cN:�loa 'a vMa �u�jj.- o a �CG'cq u o HOC ��L� o0 V O� t'i Lt) y Euu v -YY o 2COL � C y,G - L. Z. Y ^ L LU • ` N.EQ y d •" A a6 i.Cb 9 q Ex r C"Uv L�Ai o° a Lcq YaaY • Y L 6� u x 0 L d T Y� Mib �6m� Y, N U �Aa .YGYY etu L N OS °rY o o AA ,yv 3 G�"7y C U dY c 1- N d U .• r q ON w N N Y Ny �yri ri 9 �M 2 7 `•� .J L�� gL i_ E o K V EppE� - 8 2 9. _ o x P U 4 LO ry 9W�i G~6_ ._u .Oaf xY d O 1=•V W.L LOC.L II`N p•�gYY. p. N L � 6 Vd N�pS• CYV.0 Z aN tw °oo: Ana o roa N�O b O "_ r p'C._Nir i)�Y' uldV ,.• UEU M L QC.G �. a O"O'� AUQ � q��mL O J CRO M O N oy °LI n xm1 L YaiY i�o9A. 1r-q'a d« 3i�N Ci ,,, hr-q�a p. rNi L« o ZZ Ir -A.o� 't 2 C L�) 'cN:�loa T Yn 4!.a172 pyNd u U u o HOC ��L� o0 V O� 70 g op 'ac Lt) .v TaM A O`61a dY q xP ^� 2COL � C y,G - L. Z. Y ^ L LU L mGY c4 C y d •" A a6 i.Cb 9 q Ex r C"Uv L�Ai Y A M Y «49 A y 4 SLY a+ _ ss YaaY • Y L 6� u x 0 L d T Y� Mib �6m� Y, N U �Aa .YGYY etu v ^ Gaa ,_ � u i• u y v c z �� ♦O 4v— n GY G�"7y C U dY c 1- N d U .• r q ON w N N Y Ny �yri ri 9 �M 2 7 `•� .J L�� gL m . t,^)v r =q °c fit• oar ai ♦' am G_3 o Ea Ga ��L� o0 V O� R yv My `i x A O`61a dY q a± LYY v O1ta. K boo- �b Z. Y ^ L ua C`Yu iA Yq dd .. 2u oY Y 4 0 Lr E tl q l Y T Y� Mib � O LiaC •-d O n y 4 Y ^ ua� Opyv G Y o. oN EQ ^.. wvNC� L..O.� OOYY gL m SV G 911. Y N' Y ✓~r LO DA 9W�i G~6_ ._u .Oaf xY d O 1=•V W.L LOC.L II`N p•�gYY. p. N L � 6 Vd N�pS• CYV.0 Z W r• 4222 .CO �La°• y Ay CyC a` .Y)x ua c YN >Z ai' �o YLA va TcC Mib � O LiaC •-d ° Y O Y Yl T♦ x Y nQb. O r Y Y r OI L..O.� OOYY gL y ) L G 911. Y N' Y ✓~r A LO DA 9W�i G~6_ ._u .Oaf xY 6qL ♦'L N�pS• CYV.0 G G.`+L O Nt.�N EE rtL roa N�O b O "_ r p'C._Nir i)�Y' uldV O @. � O. �,♦ O L NOY•uy rr ^ _ E NC L« o ZZ Ir -A.o� QiL �YN•O' U) C WLL W£2 :e 6Yt �EEU •�+t 4 N 1•j �1 mII 2 E(i I s:d Z G O C..cs..tN.. d�L L OyQy. YyV a T C S �aY.. C �* Y �L�^ d�p ..C.Y'ar1NA S A.` 'J" V �•. °Gro.N {1 Y fir° u }> a'o �h� U uAN of L L!+ f v i y xL C Q urn E+iq t y 1 -1 O (_ ZC ,; i µ r °drK O N oa. s n D . EE u P y .+ n gcLp M ^C L O Lim y b O MY L �a +.0 C YLA ASLp. Ni NM dpp SLUG cn E, Y N y Y °L V^ L.. Mr GdL N S Yaad wU G apN yLa � c` NI erYw YE Y Y Nrl 1000,6 pb +i O!O ^V�C �p1 p1 LS Yp�L tY rt NA�l �V NY WYO. a C9 6 > P LC Utl i Atl 4't; O a� �4. '�:.. H cnG N N CM L49 C.1 O 4N c.°.M yy�L11 .L YM ^ W J b p Ow 64 Lr Crr E Yi0. am E FiC °iu I 1°G 3R�N ` �. .2 YONY .v-- av a` c n. tl°A° Y A C u 4e ya a u u e dp A LF, q c p p ��O p, u+.w ®. AYr sey>adr�a a r^ two Vg A. F L u 0 a� ro^ L yu°.YC 'ON ®c3 t.°..°. �. ; ntlu '.° ° a-On .° n L .aA Y•4 P OV_y E 0 a u~t I -at yiey..� i N S ra a Ne a =t; N naOe r9 n °A N =LC gg VA o 1ea�o� 4 [ Ew �uE ^W LL G 1010 A 0. �0 V i O nY' L.uNi 0 ayy .VV N`�M1L nL. Cpp�L N a nNpn �" .%-... e+u ,° Ndc�Lar.- u:i YAi °0c N o os. �� a A ,ti € •Ft• u q n > °'.' � � A z p t+.,, a� o h in ' "irot -ay A.Vdi °'.2 « L rn v "u m LN M" °1p t a Yu n p 9o.oN L°m Y �p pm Nq Lp x.c uA re a �mLYa.F -LO p, M.+u cmu N~n 'c^2 N •. e' UL d A ffa N^^ 4 rM`G OG. -E^L LXiN� XA O. 'Oq CL� NY 6 0104 Yd A E(i I s:d 5 Y w iuoo °Y L 44 O 92 -tSi 9N. • rn po• O d O S 4C L a °MC yH YE WyyL 401 D .L i G CZ O ~ N 22. „ViNy �~ LC OE : 4 6 G asN� yid ls rC • yC k S rysu ♦ C qU 61 w ^ y S x °6 ^C. Y «LY GT. 4N� x �1 Q EL rCN F Y !,.• �' CG q ! CC.� R D• Z �Y Na2 yew r R N 4 p� y�WN QL 9g E M YO M Y 4 T q w Y Y 'C ,�O N N. W Oq u GOO qU «L v yq Tu. L1�• 9 V.O O �UWL_ QNE p4Nd LL LG^ .D n° C b T tV L DV tlq 01L N VCa4 N�Y.aCiii EELF o6 ,NE�. «y CY L,YYYgYq D OYi� GT L «N 44 ^ N C 0' di q� tl gl Y a OdV = G �Y G'y 4� O • y V a. E 4C tl L ^W yY fir° oaO+Cc Y•^ 2 Yu0 Q� a a. rw .L,w c�iy a4i4C wu . a'... +'. Y.� L> 4'4 LL .� .^cW yq 61 CC iR 6W N� 1pnM (rIOM Yf t 6�« KLi 'C KY4PWf 6^ Wr NLLU ^9 .l�Cp Up. K ltD f� m c; • N �f Sti .-ail 5 Y w iuoo °Y L 44 O 92 -tSi 9N. U rn po• y S 4C L a °MC YE 40. CZ O ~ 4 �~ s a : 4 6 r W c,u asN� yid ls �u N dL Z! CC.� R D• � N _ �j r o s x4 k � d � r 2 L Y C C L o10 V � L i Y N O D M L y «1 � � o i c3cu ° ya L ci c c ^ yqo EO Y SYN I o c w way' c � s o L.- ! Y h Aft n A / G C• C 2 V 4 '�' � Yi Y N u. w.i.. •a ` O ru g 4W L G • w QI V U' N L � w Y 1n = •• I C •f7 i w V p Ny. � U G t" - U v ` 4 p LU G G U L> ' °M Li. OA U O 9dP W E i _ 6d .ON NS rl Q. gw Y Y C NAB 9 VU 9M S� V ° Y w O d U V gg II • 1 �V Y O C 4°.0 ^L 6 H•.• O fJd �. o Nt PI 1A h '1 N CI a U vu a°+w YO O PiyCa \. W N Y � .•• GC W LL Y6 2 E n C N T O Q Vi' p O y p N n b A V L N C r• � d 1 ai+ va Ea iu a `G Z ^.n + p G Uu U Od 2 1 ` 2 a piJ a p c` Nvt ws w Ns 9Y Vw••€ Pla uOL VL UO � uT � vC•O VN q L PC � SW dycj V.Y. r ° GCA BYO vL` GL ai � O/ =V YGNU c tL C H9 O? i� Jia GL yy LG .iM rw. KCN 4N O N�Y•+'^ rN {u w: Y •. d 1 n A low r] I. PROJECT AND SITE DESRlPTION: A. Request: The applicant has submitted for Planning ConrAssion consideration a request for doterminaLlon of ctisistency of a proposed retail ese within the Foothill Corridor Study Area. The applicant has indicated he would be leasing the site for a specified tf*e period, possibly 18 months to two years. B. Furrounding Land Use and Zoning: iortfi =�' i+ig e amily-,Zes, en ial, General Commercial South - Retail uses; Goper =-r Commarci�,l CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Single Family .Ies' ential General "mmercial West STAFF REPORT G•�° ``�� Plan Designations: -Site foie` Q' }* O ilorth - Commercial South DATE July 23, 1986 v :977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Pianoing Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner 8Y: Debra Maier, Assistant Planner SUNECT: PRELIMINARY REVIEW. 86-49! - HERNAN`!EZ - A consistency determination a weep tle Too lr Corridor Interim Policies and a proposal to occupy an <existing house for the opertion of general retail sales in the General Commercial District, located at 5612 Fcythiil Souievard - APN 208 - 153 -12, 13, I. PROJECT AND SITE DESRlPTION: A. Request: The applicant has submitted for Planning ConrAssion consideration a request for doterminaLlon of ctisistency of a proposed retail ese within the Foothill Corridor Study Area. The applicant has indicated he would be leasing the site for a specified tf*e period, possibly 18 months to two years. B. Furrounding Land Use and Zoning: iortfi =�' i+ig e amily-,Zes, en ial, General Commercial South - Retail uses; Goper =-r Commarci�,l East - Single Family .Ies' ential General "mmercial West - Bank, General Comm -ci al C. "eneral Plan Designations: -Site foie` - or irci a ilorth - Commercial South Commercial East - Coarnerrial West - Commercial D. V t Characteristics: The site is made up of two lots, 130 k 5 y ee and 130 feet by 50 feet.. There are three ex, *,tinq structures, a house with a detached garage and an accessory building at the back portion of t:te lot. The <emat'ling area is graded for parking. Tine uAte has heeri y.reviously used as a pool sales office; however, ,:zany standa;ti 1 to improvements necessary for commercial uses were rtaver installed. E `� � �� g �� C. Land Use: The applicant has indvcated he woull like to use the existing structure for retail clothing sales and beauty shop activities to create a boutique -like atmosphere. Both uses are permitted under the Development Code and the Interim Policies at this location. However, this block is characterized by non- conforming lot sizes, structures and uses, as well as strip cmercial activity which is the prime reason the Foothill Corridor Study was initiated. The interim policies are an atempt to combine a complex set of issues dealing with land use, urban design, traffic and circulation to achieve the following goal: a high quality, attractive, and unifying design image reflective of community heritage, and provide a viable setting for a balanced mixture of residential and commercial activities with safe and efficient traffic circulation and access." i D. Master Plan: The purpose of the Master Plan is to provide for in egra a evelopment at the earliest possible time in the review process. Master planning of defined areas will avoid development of single parcels of land in a manner which precludes future development of adjacent parcels in Lhe best way possible. Therefore, site development of these two small lots ' preclude an opportunity to coordinate the land use and site planning for quality development consistent with the standards for Foothill Boulevard, which is to de- emphasize strip commercial by creating organized groups of structures and uses, and provide for efficient utilization of land. M, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Pk 86 -44 - Hernandez July 23, 1986 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: A. General: This site is located in a Study Area along Foothill Ye _eFn Archi bald and Kl usman that is made up of non- conformf ng lots and structures arzd small strip commercial uses with r..y improved access. The subject parcel is one portion of a larger area (see Exhibit "li ") which the Planning Coomission has previously stated 'should be a prime target for study in developing the Foothill Corridor Plan. B. Conversion of Existing Residential Dwelling: Conversion of exis irg residential -dwe ings to a new use on non - conforming lots is permitted, provided it is an integral part of a Master ' Plan development consistent with the Interim Policies for the Foothill Boulevard Corridor. In addition, conversion of such a structure may require landscaping of all setbacks and parkways, a trash enclosure; handicap access and parking; drainage system, additional right -of -way dedication, and street . improvements. C. Land Use: The applicant has indvcated he woull like to use the existing structure for retail clothing sales and beauty shop activities to create a boutique -like atmosphere. Both uses are permitted under the Development Code and the Interim Policies at this location. However, this block is characterized by non- conforming lot sizes, structures and uses, as well as strip cmercial activity which is the prime reason the Foothill Corridor Study was initiated. The interim policies are an atempt to combine a complex set of issues dealing with land use, urban design, traffic and circulation to achieve the following goal: a high quality, attractive, and unifying design image reflective of community heritage, and provide a viable setting for a balanced mixture of residential and commercial activities with safe and efficient traffic circulation and access." i D. Master Plan: The purpose of the Master Plan is to provide for in egra a evelopment at the earliest possible time in the review process. Master planning of defined areas will avoid development of single parcels of land in a manner which precludes future development of adjacent parcels in Lhe best way possible. Therefore, site development of these two small lots ' preclude an opportunity to coordinate the land use and site planning for quality development consistent with the standards for Foothill Boulevard, which is to de- emphasize strip commercial by creating organized groups of structures and uses, and provide for efficient utilization of land. M, PLANNING COt!11±1IS'SION STAFF REPORT PR 86 -49 - Hernandez >v July 23, 1986 Page 3 r� Kra M. CONCUSION In similar cases along Foothill Boulevard and Ix- specificalTy on this block, the Planning Commission has :detenjiinetl this kind of use conversi-on to not be consistent with the Interim Policies. The Comission has consistently stated that it is preferable far 'epplicants to postpone costly site improvements: until completion ;of the Foothill Specific Flan. Therefore, it woul d seem that the following options are avai l abl a for consideration: 1. O,UWttal of a complete application for Development Revco. prior to using the structure for comierciai activity. 2. Detexmine that the request does not meet the goals an&,policies of foothill Corridor and that any site impi,R;rements be discouraged until the Foothill Plan is complete and a plan is submitted,donsistenL with the Foothill Specific Plan, IV. RECOMMEWi.T.IM Staff recommends that tip= Planning Commission consl �3 r a=i nput and testimony regarding; !this item and provide direction to staff and applicant in 'regard to proceeding with the applicant`s request. aesfully s Brad Buller City Planner BB :DM:ns - Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "Br Study Area r.- -. Ij LE. 1 V NORTH i AkILA CITY OF rrevt. /W A-4q RANCI10 CUCAMONGA TrrL- PLANNING DRrEfON q_q EvHiBrr:—A_sc,,%.t.E. ROAD at$ 76 a .y 10 3 3 1.27 AC. m/L a++I�S±±��= 73 i D. Z - 4 �. P. . i r< Ly '� it tT h w � 19 .60 AC' Met ❑ fS d[ 22 �93 16 ..! ~ zan.;� :zT "14'•': v 1'..;, ..` � �" : i8 ja+i -, •' ,f 793 s . vr _ - •� - f 5624- ..so• ... . Sf +� /OG TJ• q 44 I t5 7 py ;'ati dr? 17 t6 d5 j14 N •13 12 id !0 4 3 2 ! -J:z t3 t2 ! l t rnS7S v r v i ro - - BOULEVARD _ ��- SE. COR. SEC.3 f r� NORTH i CITY OF c M -- 4T 11 RANCHO CUCAMONGA Trru: PLANN[NG DtVISK N EXHIBIT: U DATE: TO: FROM, SUBJECT: 't CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONC A STAFF REPORT .L July 233 1986 > 1977 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86 -08 APPEAL - FRIEDMAN - An appeal of a Condition of Approval requiring the, under-grounding of existing overhead utilities fronting the project, located on the south side of Jersey Boulevard, 7001± east of Vincent Avenue APN 209-143-28. I. ABSTRACT: The developer is requesting that the Planning Commission delete the Condition of Approval requiring the undergroc:iding of existing overhead utilities along the Jersey Boulevard frontage of the project. Il. BACKGROUND: The proposed project consists of the conversion of two large bui dings (50,000 square feel: and 25,000 square feet) into multi- tenant spaces by the use of interior separation wails and the construction of small exterior additions to be used as office space for each unit. The project location is shown on Exhibit "A" along with the status of development in the area. The project site plan is shown on Exhibit "B". The existing overhead utility lines extend from Haven Avenue to the westerly terminus of Jersey Boulevard. The lines fronting the project are shown on Exhibit "C". The Conditions of Approval were established by the City Planrer and presented to the applicav-; ay letter dated June 6, 1986 (see Exhilrit "D"). Engineering Division Condition No. 5, on the second page, is the Condition in question. The developer's appeal letter is shown on Exhibit "E". III. ANALYSIS: Current Planning Commission policy requires that all eve opments underground existing overhead utilities located adjacent to the project limits, unless specifically waived by the Planning Commission; therefore, staff required undergrounding as a Condition of Approval for this project. As can be seen from Exhibit "A ", the property on the opposite side of Jersey Boulvard is vacant, therefore, the developer will be eligible for reimbursement of one -half the standard fee collected from future developments as they occur on the opposite side of Jersey Boulevard. ITEM R P, - �. Ask IV ] PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF Rt ORP KiR 86 -08 APPEAL > FRIEDMAN July 23, I986 Page 2 IV. - RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the appeal be denied; tharefore, t upholding the requirement to underground adjacent overhead utilities, z Respectfully submitted, r.. rwtJ Barrye Hanson r Senior Civil Engineer BH:ka r Attachments: Vicinity Map a Site Plan !Utility Lines Photograph Conditions of Approval ,.. Developer's appeal Letter P, - �. Ask IV ] G D -1 i 1 � 1 1 ¢ i .I 1 I 1 } Y II i ,I 11r 'I i tI II Il I� it t� it i i i t i 1 r r 1 I Qz f�l c0 Ntv /v+ W ' 0 A ua CL. Q Cl- co cO q a0 Z _ C V D �-1 w W O � �i 3 4it4 'ji ; s�nea;s 1 i � O Ft r a� ` z.� V ® O U A r� u 5/S JERSEY BLVD. Looking west In front of Friedman Homes CITE' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING I3I`T. sm J I M: MDR 86-US APPEAL TIM: Utility Lines P,)LMIT: c w CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. W H.y..JeRrey King x �—: �Z Cevwrdmen &y � C+r ra: 1917 1977 Chutes L Buquet 11 Jon Richard Dd M. aW Pamela J,wri�ght t. June 3, 1986 Mr. Pain Friedman 4455 Rowland El Monte, California 91731 SUBJECT: MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86 -08 - INDUSTRIAL PARK Dear Mr. Friedman: The Development Review`;�rocess for the above described project has been successfully completed and approval has been granted based upon certain findings and conditions. Thank you for your participation and cooperation during this review process. We sincerely hope th.;: this Process has been a positive experience for all involved. This decision shall be effective following a ten (10) day appeal. eriod beginning with the date of receipt of this letter. fINGINGS A. That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Industrial Specific Plan and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and B. That ?he proposed use, together with the conditions applic;31,'-e thereto, will not be detrimental to the public heals` Safety,- or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. C. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of tha .andlicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan; D. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan. CONDITIQNS This project is subject to the following conditions and attached Standard Conditions. 1. Details of the employee lunch plaza shall be provided as a part of the landscape plans to the satisfaction of the City Planner. EXHIBIT 11 D 9320 WELINg ROAIi, SurrE C a POST OPPICE BOX 807 • RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORM91730 . (714) 989.19S! sl Mr ..Paul Friedma'�; MOR "86-43 June 3, 1986 Page 2 2. The following conditions- shall be completed prior to Occupancy of anY unit other than that to be occupiu by the applicant:, a. Metal truck doors, both new and existing, shall be && painted to match exterior plaster. F b. Parting lot shall be restri ed landscaping installed and employee plunchrs and installed per the site plan. Plaza r' c. Remove existing masonry walls and chain link rolling gates alcng Jersey Avenue. 3. Remove all existing roof canopies and dust collect tlhe elevations. or per r 4. Applicant shall contact the Building and Safety Division` r for appropriate permits. S. Existing overhead electric 'tines less than 66 KV and telecommunication lines on the south side of Jersey Boulevard from the first pole west of the westerly property line to the first pole east of the easterly property line shall be placed underground prior to occupant;-. If you should have any further 9uestiions or cOmments, please do not hesitate to contact this office. - Sincerely, COMI DEVELOPMEN PARTMENl' P N NG VISION eman Senior Planner OC:ns cc: Jerry Grant, Building & Safety Divisioi Peter Pitassi, Pitassi Dalma'i Architects l r-; y - _,. :�14 June 11, 1936 Mr. Dan Coleman Senior Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: MONOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86 -08 - INDUSTRIAL PARK ' Dear Mr. Coleman: I have received a copy of the findings and conditionsi on above noted project. Item .5 of condition is an expense ; of such enormous proportions I must appear that item to the necessary authorities. or I want to thank you and the various staff members for expediously processing our project. This is our new home in Rancho Cucamonga and q we anxiously look forward to our move. L Ve T ulv Yours, Friedman - ri dman Homes PF /mh CITY OF RANctJO CUCAMONGA PLANNING 014'15'0' JUN 161966 PIS AM '�181`31IO1111121�.t2t31�?,sr6 1 4•� 4455 ROWLAND AVE. EL MONTE, CALIFORNIA 91731 (818) S79 -1454 EXHIBIT It E It ,ii