Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1986/08/13 - Agenda Packet
a a PYA *' t 7777777 MY OF RAC CLCr1i�1'D_ WA "". MA tT'7TIOI U AGENDA WSDNESDAY AUGUST 13, 1986 7:00 p.m. I XOT )S PARK COMMUNITY CENTER ER 3161 BASS LIKE L P. edge of Al%anee IL RoU Call Commissioner Barker Commissioner Rempel Commissioner Chitiea CAMMISsioner Stout ,.' Commissioner McNiel TEL Announcements IV. Approval of Minutes June 11, 1986 July 9, 1986 F Y. r Consent Calendar The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non: controversial They will be acted on by the Commission & one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it shouidbe removed for discussion. A. RESOLUTION OF DENIAL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85 -54 - ROADRUNNER - The development o�200 square toot industrial building or a truck repair/maintenance service business on 3.5 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8) located at the north mdeof Whittrsm, 800 feet west of Pecan Avenue - APN 201 - 211.40. B. DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 9225 - HILL /WILLIAMS -A review of W—A tmg a ev U-'6ns or 46 single a amily detached Yaomes witiba an existing residential subdivision of 69 lots on 15 acres in the Low Residetl#iql District located on the northwest corner of Highland and Oskimlian - At N 1062- 621 -03 through 71. f L. -114141 C. FINAI, TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 10088 - FFRI! J)UMAN HOMES - A residential subdivision of 82 acres into 131 single family lot- .1a thii Va.- Low Residential District (1 -2 du/ae) generally locate.; at 1 e no theast corner of ` Archibald and Carrari Street - 4 N ,' 1- 071 -14, 37, and 45. Vi. 'Pubue He$rings The following items ara public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice- their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Ch" airman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be Limited to 5 minutes per individual for each riroject. D. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 04 -09 - AMENDMENT - LDS CHURCH - The request to amend the approved Conditional Use' Permit allowing the installation o, four 35 -foot high and tv:,'50 -foot hig'n light fixtures for the northerly softball and soccer fields located at 6829 Ttiwan Avenue, north of a Victoria Street - APN 227 06-65 and 23. (Continued from July 23, 1986 meeting.) E. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85 -36 - TARGET STORES - The establishment of a temporary office trailer as an ancillary use to an existing warehouse facility on 6.4 acres of land within the General Industrial/Rail Served (Subarea 10) District, :ocaied on the east side; cf Pittsburg Avewue; between Newport Drive and 7th Street -y APN 229- 26 -46. F. TENTATIVE TRACT 12671 - LEWIS HOMES - The total develor-hent of a residential subdiviiQon of 21.0 acres in the Lqw Medium Residential District (.4 -8 du/ ac) within the Terra Vista Planned Community into 151 lots, located on the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Terra Vista Parkway • APN 1077- 091 -29. In addition, applicant has requested a Tree Removal Permit to remove the existing windrow to accommodate the Milliken Avenue alignment. G. PARCEL MAP 9504 - DICKER- WARMIIvGTON - A division of 15.3 acres into 11 parcels within the Neighborhood Commercial District of the Terra Vista Planned Community, located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Haven Avenue - APN 202- 001 -25, 26. (Related project: CUP 86 -05) IL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 86-05 DICKER- WARRINGTON - The development of an integrated shopping center of approximately 136,730 square feet which includes six (6) satellite buildings where one satellite building is a one drive -in facility on 15.3 acres of land in the Neighborhood Commercial District of the Terra Vista Planned Community, located at. the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Haven Avenue - APN 242- ('01 -25, 26, (Related project. PM 9504) -114141 1. PARCEL MAP 10007 - SUPRACOTE ,1NCORPORAT,ED - A division of 15,9 acres of land into 2 parcels within the General Industrial Area (Subarea 8), located on the north aide of Arrow Highway, east of Maple Avenue - APN 208- 351 -12. J. DEMOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 86 -01 - BROCK. DEVELOR -MENT - A Development District Amendment from O ice /Professional to Low Medium Presidential (44- du /ac) for 3.67 acres of located at the northwest corner of Archii d Avenue and 19th Street - APN 202- 1091-21. K. TENTATIVE TRACT 13353 - BROC" DEVELOPMENT -,The y= total development o 6.83 acres o land in the Medium a Residential District (8 -14 du/ac) into a 2 lot residential r subdivision for the development of a 64 unit multi - family condominium complex, located on the northwest corner of :,rchibald Avenue and 19th Street - APN *202-1091-21. L. DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 88 -02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Development DEU -t Map from "Low" (2 -4 du/ac) to Law � Medium (4 -8 du/s�" ' f or 13.5 acres of land, located on the I south Side of Peron,., ,ist of Archibald Avenue - APN 209 -085 - 1 02, 03, 14. I M. VARIANCE 86 -03 - VINEYARD NATIONAL LANK - A request to redune tre front yard setback for the development ` of a 14,000 square foot office addition to an existing 4,806 square foot office building on i.44 acres of land within the General Commercial District, located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Klusman Avenue - APN 208 - 15 -01. (Related project. DR 86 -17) N. RAIVISIONS TO THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN - G1FY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Reconsideration o Research and Development use standards and the potential of authorizing Research and Development uses along "Maven Avenue within the Industrial Area Specific Plan. V . New Business O. ENVIRf)NMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86 -17 - VINEYARD BANK - The de-viii-opffi-en-t-7 a 14,000 square foot office addition to an existing 4,800 square foot building on 1.44 acres of land within the General Commercial District, located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Kloisman Avenue - APN 208- 15 -01. (Related project: VA 86 -03? i P. ENVIRONMENTAL 6SSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT !REVIEW 86 -14 _ - HAVEN AVENUE INVESTORS The development of one 11,950 square foot o- ice building on 1.005 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7) located on the east side of Haven Avenue, approximately 550 feet south of Civic Center Drive - APN $08- 153 -12 and 13. Continued from July 23, 1986 meeting.) Q. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT VIE W 86 -18 L &M DEVELOPMENT" -The development of a 40,000 square foot office building on 1.7 acres of land within the Office Professional District, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Turner Avenue - APN 208- 331 -30. R. PRELIMINARY REVIEW 86 -52 - RISINGER a consistency determination between the Foothill Corridor Interim, Policies and a propsoal to occupy an existing structure for ':he operation of retail floor, covering sales in the General Commercial District located at 8291 Foothill Boulevard APN 207-113-24. S. APPEAL OF MINOR DB)'ELOPMENT REVIEW 85-09 - GROAT - Appeal of staff's lecision denying the installation oTa satellite dis;i antenn& on the side of The Excha,.ge building located at the souti east corner of Carnelian Street and Base Line Road - APN 2( 1- 031 -28. T. APPEAL OF THE UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM FOR HAVEN VILLAGE sHoPoNG CENTER. - CUP 84 -31- DIVERSIFIED - The request to appeal the conditions o apf� proval for a Uniform Sign. Program imposed by the City Plenner for the major tenants within the haven Village Shopping Center located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Highland Avenue. VIII. 14rWor% Reports U. NORTHTOWN PARK DENSITY BONUS AGRFEMENT V. R_uDIFICATION OF RESIDENTIAL NOISE STANDARDS W. RESIDENTIAL FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS I& Commission Business is t �. i M 11 El S. PubUe: Comm This is the time and place for the general public to address the CommisSiom Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. �% 6d2atanmr�f, , The Planning Commission has adopted AdministratGtre Regulations that set an Si p.m. adfournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with rn� consent of the Commission. J f 1� N VICINITY NAAP { SPHERE OF INFLUENCE � t rF CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON 0 rv- 7 A w, 4 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CTTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPO `r August 13, 1986 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Nancy Fong, Associate Planner RESOLUTION JF DENIAL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VULLUPMENT REVIEW 85 -54 --RO The development a 9200 square toot 1n us r a uilding for a truck repair /maintenance service business on 3.5 acres of hand in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8). located at the nortiy side of Whittram Avenue, 500 feet west of Pecan Avenue - APN ?09- 211 -40. I. ABSTRACT: The purpose of this report is for the Planning omm�ission to review and adopt a Resolution of Denial for an .incomplete application for the above described project. .1. BACKGROUND: The applicant, on December" 20, 1985, submitted eve opment plans to the Planning Division for review. As a result of staff review, the project application was found to be incomplete for processing. A. notice of incompleteness was sent out to the applicant and attached with it was a list of required additional information needed to make the app'tication complete. Normally, an incomplete application could not be scheduled for Committee's review. However, at the request of the applicant, the project was forwarded to the February 18, 1986 Technical Review Committee and the February 20, 1986 Design Review Committee wnere both Committees did not recommend approval. The Technical Review Committee stated that the drainage study ,<ibmitted for review was inadequate in addressing flood protection mitigation measures. The Design Review Committee recommended that the proposed building elevation and metal materials were inconsistent with the Design Guidelines of the Industrial Specific Plan. A follow -up letter summarizing the recommendations of the Technical and Design Review Committees was sent to the applicant on February 24, 1986, with a list of items that the applicant must complete prior to the forwarding the project to the Planning Commission for review. On April 16, 1986, the Engineering Division sent out a letter of incompleteness ict regards to a revised flood report for the proposed project, On June 17, 1986, staff sent out a letter informing the developer about the time limit for the processing of his project was about to expire. To date, staff has not received any response from the applicant, the developer, or the legal property owner. ITEM A ill. REGULATORY PROVISIONS AND PROCEDURES FOR PERMIT APPLICATIONS N4cor Ong q e Guren eve 11 . (311C I lI ! , ap er ermzt Application section of the Code, the applicant must supply the requested plans and/or information within sixty (60) days of the` notice of incomplete filing. In the event that the information needed for preparing an environmental document and for reviewing a praj ect is not provided by the applicant within the time limits specified by this secti.oR;, the City may deny a permit for a development project based 65 the following findings: A. Information has not been supplied by the applicant that is necessary to prepare a' i egal°ly adequate environmental doccnnent. B. That the required information without which the City's decision to approve a project would not be supported by substantial evidence, Iv. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission review a esdlptic;1 of Denial. If the Planning C. ission xa,l support the findings, then adoption o; the Resolution of Denial Aft would be,;in order. aRetfully y� bs�'tte �1�utl er / City Planner 88 :NF: ko Attachments: Chronology of the Project; June 17, 1988, Staff Letter to ,Applicant April 16, 1986, Staff Letter Ge Applicant February 24, 1988 Staff Letter w Applicant DATES September 4, 1985 September 18, 1985 September 25, 1085 September 30, 1985 November 22, 1985 December 5, 1985 CHRONOLOGY OF DEVELOPMENT REIVEW 85 -54 STATUS Prelipi nary plans for the above des -- ed project were reviewed at the planning & Engineering meeting. Both Divisions determined that the p.reiiminary plans were inadequate in ploviding necessary information to ra )tiew the project. Applinnt resubmitted preliminai ^y plans for stagy, review on September 25, 1985. Staff has��' reviewed the avised preliminary plans and dererminet I-tt it has not addressed the previous caments of September 4, 1985. Staff met with the applicant to discuss staff comments regarding the preliminary plans. A ,'bllow -up ' letter was sent out to the applicant. Staff, was concerned with the proposed metal building design and brought it to the Design Review Committee for., their preliminary Comments. The Design Review Committee stated that the proposed metal design is unacceptable as it does not comply with Urban Design Guidelines of the I.S.P. Staff informed the applicant regarding the Committee comments on the following day. Staff, in a letter to the applicant, clarified the intent of the preliminary review process,, The purpose is to identify site constraints and major design issues for the development proposal and to provide direction to the applicant early in the review process, so as to avoid undue time delays or expenditures. The preliminary review is an informal one and occurs prior to format application, !"!' December 20, 1985 The applicant, Mountain View Builders, submitted a formal application for the proposed project and development` plans for staff to review for completeness. January 10, 1986 Staff sent a letter notifying the applicant that his proposed project was deemed to be incomplete for processing. Attaches with the letter is a list outlining the additional information needed prior to funding the application complete. January 29, and 30, 1936' On both occasions, staff met with the ! applicant to discuss the incompleteno of Vie project, item by item. February 18, and 20, 1986 At the request of the applicant, staff. - scheduled ed the project for the (l,, , two meetings, Technical Review Committee and Design Review Committe. Both vonzittees did not recommend for approial of the project. Technical Review�,Gommittee stated that the drainage study submitted was inadequate in providing mitigation measures for flood protection, The Design Review Committee recommended that the applicant address the issues of the proposed metal building materials, which does not comply with _:the Urban Design Guidelft*s of the industrial Specific Plan, Building materials should be of tilt -up concrete, dryvi or other materials as approved by the Design Review Committee. February 24, 1986 A letter was sent to the applicant and the developer summarizing the Design and Technical Review Committees' comment with a list of items that must be completed prior to forwarding for Planning Commission review, March 20, 1986 A letter was sent to t� developer updating the status of his project and reiterated those items as listed in the February 24, 1986 1etiter must be addressed prior to forwarding the project for planning Commission raview. a Mr, ,a,- . April 16, 1986 Engi neeri ng a letter to the engineer represe"ting the applicant regardi ng the incompleteness of the fl ood report. June 17 1986 " A letter „ was ,sent' to the - developer., applicant ands the owner. -� regardi,h.g the time limits fir processlioq this project, ` Which As about to ekpa -re. staff al,sd requested that the applicant,, or a developer, or a legal property owner inform staff as to the stAus of this project if they Wish to pursue with it. To date, no 'response from any one of, them. ,. July 28, 1986 A phone .convers,:tion with the developer, indicated that they, have dropped the die project. However, states that he did not Wish to send a letter requesting ;or withdrawal from l the prof ect, y' a r :r i R E 6 1'r ;�" , •'`�R 'F"'^N?v x-45 "Y '�� a tad elgCM[O =� C ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA M. )—,jerrrey lone ! i... G..tLneaMa 9r Charles J, a+quet iI Jon 0. biikels ^y Rchard K Dald Pamela L. Wright June 17, 1986 ry Lou S. Sadler GW Walker & Company 150 Louis'dha Boulevard, N.E. Albuquerque, NM 87108_- _ SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86 -54 Dear Mr. Sadler Review of our files ind ates that the time lii7its for processing of your above - described project fire about to expire. 'It would appear that your Project will not be able to be completed in time. Therefore, in order to continue processing, it gill be necessary to file a written extension request. Please find enclosed, for your convenience, an extension`-letter to be signed and returned to the Planning Division. If we do not receive a letter of extension within fourteen (14) days, then it will be assumed that you no longer wish to parsue this project. The City of Rancho Cucamonga wouid have no other alternative but to take this project to the next available Planning Commission meeting for denial without prejudice. Thank you for your cooperation and assistance in this matter. If you should have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELO4 itNT DEPARTMENT PLANN2NG DIV ION - Nancy ng Associ to Planner NF :ko CC: Don Jones _ Richard Arden Enc. 1 3L' 4_J .�''�G�ceLroYc Y' CITE" OF RANCHO CUCAMONC .-4. rho d t,l,uquet I( Jefl're? Rini April 16, 1"R6 likf a m.fhthl PamelaJ.Wriglit Douglas Goodman Brown Bag 165 N. Hospitality Lane San Bernardino, California 52408 SUBJECT: OR 85 -54 fLU00 REPORT Dear Mr. Goodman: The City considers your Flood Report to be incomplete as presented. Please complete the fallowing items and incorporate them into the report: I. Provide profiles (existing and proposed) of the channel showing the flowline and water surface. Include a sufficient distance both upstream and downstream to justify the reach through the site. 2. Provide cross- sections of the channel including the building at the locations shown on the attached "site and cenreptual grading plan". Include the channel water carrying capacity. The sections shall be based upon, actual fiend conditions. 3. Provide calculations to justify the channel water carrying capacity. 4. Justify that the 100 year flood water surface will not be raised by the development. F.£.M.A. has recently changed this requirement. Previously the water surface could be raised a maximum of one foot in order to meet this requirement. It may be necessary to construct a channel capable of carrying the total Q100 of egoot cfs. 5. Provide information or, the status of existing drainage easements for the channel. Additional dedications may be required. 6. Show erosion protection measures along the channel banks including justification for the design, 7. Provide details on tki f1cod proofi.eg of the building if it is to be subjected to `.hp Q100 flows. 9320 BASELINE ROAD, SUITE C + POST OFFICE BO:L Sot • RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA 91130 • (114) 9$9 -7851 w I Mr.��ood: April 16, 1980 Page 2 «, b 8. The City Flood Ordinance No. 2 D, SP :t on 19.12.120(x) (copy attached), prohibits the storage of fizimt,le, explosive materials within flood hazard areas. Provide infbrmation on how the proposed gasoline - diesel "facility will be made to comply with the Ordinance. It is recommended that you became thoroughly aware of the content of the attached Flood Ordinance so that the various required certifications can be made at the appropriate step of development. If you should have any questio w', do not hesitate to contact Mr. Joe Stofa or the undersigned at (714) 989 -1862. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION Barrye R. Hanson Senior Civil Engineer PRH:JS:das Enclosure cc: Lou Sadler, G.W. Walker & Co. Richard Arden, Mountain View Builders, Inc. Dan Coleman, Senior Planner CITY OF RANCHO C1UCAMONGA +7 t.,unn(mrmMn 1977 ellarl ., J. Rugtrvt II Jeffrv% King; Richard \L Uaid Pamela J, Wright Marc'! 20, 1986 F• Lou Sadler G.W. Walker & Company 150 Louisianna Bculevard, NE Albuquerque, New Mexico 87108 SUBJECT: RR 85 -54 - Roadrunner Dear Mr. Sadler: The purpose of this letter is to give you a: update on the status of your project. Per my letter of February ?4, 1986, to you, summarizing the Committee's recommendations, I have listed all the items that are required to be completed prior to scheduling your project for the next available Planning Commission -agenda. On March 10, 1986, Mountainview Builders, ire.,. submitted revised plans. Our review of the revised plans indicate that many iss+,-- have not been addressed. 1. The Engineering nivision still has not received a revised flood /hyds-olog, study. However, the City Engineer, Mr. L,,,fd Hubbs, and Senior Civil Engineer, Mr. Shintu Bose, eid meet with your engineer, Mr. Douglas Goodman, in discussing the _ Flood Channel improvements. The City f+irther learned that after that meeting, Mr. Douglas Goodman iJ na longer involved in your project. _ 2. The "revised grading plan" submitted, essentially has the sar+a information as reviewed before, where t;:e Grading Committee determined it to be unacceptable. 3. The two sets of "revised development plans" were es•.entially the same plans that were submitted initially, which staff has determined it to be incomplete. As you are aware from the last Design Review Committee meeting, you may elect to proceed with the metal building elevations as proposed, or revise the elevations per DRC Comments (see attached), All other items as listed in our letter of February 24, 1986, must be addressed nr,nr to fnrn•arrt,rr, ¢Z- 9320 BASELINE ROAD, SUITE • POST WICE BOX 8i)7 • P.ANC110CUMNIO`MA,CALIPnRA7)A 4171n , rltalaao.forl i 1 We look forward to completing this project and await your response as to your intentions, If you should have any further questions, please do not hesitate ' to call Nancy Fong, Associate Planner at (714) 989 -1861. 1. N Sincerely, COITY DE LOPMEN DEPA ENT ) P AC N: IN& DIVI ON { an Coleman. Senior Planner. ' OC:NF:cv Attachments- February 24, 1986, letter to Mr. Lou Sadler 4r.: Barrye h. Swnior Civil Engineer Richard Arc��,,, Mountainview Builders, Inc. Don Jonas, Roadrunner Enterprises .1 c= 0:CAar� tc� CITY OF RANCHO .0 CA4ONGA N.4 —hin :1. Jlikeis l rlcsJ.11nq d; umil Jeffrey hin. y .6chard f.D.Al Pat -AaJ.IWight February 24, 1986 Lou Sadler 150 Louisiana Blvd, N.E. Albuznerque, New Mexico 87168 SUUJECT: DR 85 -54 Dear Mr. Sadler: The Design and Technical Review Committees have reviewed the development plans for the above - described project. This process is provided so that major' development concerns and adequacy of plans may be addressed early in the review process. Please find attached 'a copy of the Design Review Commi .tee comments as well as copies of the Technical Review Committee comments, All of these comments and requirements are given to help direct you to camplete and revise you project in accordance -with City standards and po`icies. We nook forward to continue working with you to resolve corcerns identified through the Committee review process, Based upon thr, significance• of these issues, revised plans must be submitted for additional Committees review. The following items must be completed prior to scheduling your project fc%r the next available Planning Commission Agenda: J. Revise and submit four copies of the Flood /Hydrology Study • to the Engineering Division for review and approval. 2. Revise grading plan per the reco-111mendations of the Flood Study as mentioned above and the Grading Committee recommendations. Four sets of such revised grading plan shall be submitted to the Planning Divisica for committee review. 3. Two sets of revised dev- 1opment packages which include site Plan, grading plan, landscape plan and elevations and site Utilization map shall be submitted to Planning Division, 4. One set 8 1/2 x 1.1 reductions of the revised development packages shalt be submitted to ?lanning ;'tivision. S. One set of revised co%.-ad plans which include landscape plans, and elevations shall be submitted to Planning Di a-i si on. C'10h h1 CDi t *Thn ... n,•,.r. n ......— .......... ...n. -..... ._.. Mr. Sadler 3 February 24, 198 t ' Page 2 } 'Ni F If you should have any further questions or torments, Please do not hesitate to calm, Sincerely, COKMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMOrr PLAHNIN DIVISSI Nancy. Forig Associate P an NFdas Atta6ment: Technical Review Committee Comments Design Review Committee Comments cc, .Richard Arden Barrye,Hanson N Adh 1 i f I DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS % 6:00 - 6:30 , f Nancy February 20, 1986 ENVIROII,MENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85 -54 - ROADRUNNER - The development of a 12,600 square foot industrial building for a truck r. , air /maintenance service business on 3.5 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8) located at the north side of Whittram Avenue, 600 feet west of Pecan Avenue - APN 209- 211 -40. Design Parameters The site Is being used for a trucking terminal with minimal on -site improvements.; An existing single family house, that has been converted to office use, is• located off Wh ;ttram Avenue. The developer is proposing to remove this building at such time the new building is completed. West of the' site is an unimproved Etiwanda Creek. Back round: Since last September 1985, the applicant has submitted this p—roject for preliminary review twice, with essentially the same design of site plan' and elevations. Staff has met with the applicant and through correspondence also, has consistently informed the applicant of the technical issues bf the site plan and the design issues of the architecture. The applicant has ,made minimal revisions to the site plan in complying with the Industrial Specific Plan standards, however, technical issues such -as flood protection, grading and drainage are still jinresoived. The Design Review Committee has informally reviewed the proposed elevation (metal building materials) and has stated that the elevations' are. not in compliance with the Urban Design Guidelines of the -s. S.P. Stafr 'has informed the applicant regarding this design issue. Staff Comments Site Plan:-- 1• A second means of access should be provided along Whittram Avenue and could be designed as a emergency access such as turf block material. 2. The parking and storage of trucks and trailers must be screened through a decorative block wall and landscaping along lhittram. Avenue. Landscaping: Twenty -five foot average landscaping along Whittram Avenue is required, as measured from ultimate curb face. Elevations: The proposed elevation consists of steel/metal •frame and mansard with br4ck verte r and sandr,'r-t t metal roof ift wall. Are the proposed elevations consiza__,cc with the eUrban! Design hGuidel Guidelines of the Industrial Specific Plan, in areas of building design;, architectural treatment, building materials, and a continuity of design? R �� r. r orl y m ,. G � ) �ry The proposed` project should be'rede ice s,,ned to provide a safe and' pleasing environment to work within. TIAe design of buildings and site plan should recognize tile ci.ztatc, the phy >ical setting and the best architectural traditions of Soutnern California. Ail s exterior walls of buildings should have arrhitectural treat;t ,int, creative use,of material, texture, color, andjer building farm. Articula. "don of elevation surfaces should be provided through the use of openings 'recesses and, which create texture and shadow patterns and provide.,variety to a building plane. .� Design Revrew 4oacni'4ttte Action Members Present: Dennis Stout, Herman Rempel, Dan Coleman � ' Staff Planner: Nancy Fong The Committee, recommended tt.et the.following improvements be provided: 1. Instead of turf block materials for the emergency access, the K developer should explore the possibility of widening the �- proposed driVervap on- Whittram Avenue with a landscape median subject to the approval of Foothill Fire Di° rict and Engineering: Division. 2.• Average twenty -five foot landscaping along Whittram Avenue be Ask provided. 3. Building materiais for the proposed elevations be of tilt -up concrete, dryvit or other materials approved'by the Committee. x t �a 1.9 41 r r-- a I o r e to •.� •'.T. ��F��(ii }�_djFFir =1 �... .i! Oy fit ,•�,x.,titiak.ti +� k ; ;= i �Pt ai. ri t !� Pit g SITS' AND •CL�!CFPTUAL GRADING PLAN .,. ..(( .w.e. w { 3a e i ti i i jr. I, I r f i to •.� •'.T. ��F��(ii }�_djFFir =1 �... .i! Oy fit ,•�,x.,titiak.ti +� k ; ;= i �Pt ai. ri t !� Pit g SITS' AND •CL�!CFPTUAL GRADING PLAN .,. ..(( .w.e. w { 3a e i ti i i 3 s .. R> NO F p i3 .t i d d d 3 Iq ` /( z +t I d x r 5l i r aj I L, p �77 0 2 • 4 l Iq ` /( z +t I d x r 5l i r aj I L, RESOLUTION N0. - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, DENYING, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, A REQUEST FOR THE APPROVAL OF A 'DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85 -54, TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 9200 SQUARE FOOT INDUSTRIAL BUILDING FAR A TRUCK REPAIRJMAIWTENANCE SERVICE BUSINESS ON 3.5 ACRES OF LAND IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 8) OF THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE NORTH SIDE OF WHITTRAM AVENUE, 600 FEET WEST OF PECAN AVENUE - APN 209 - 211 -40, WITHIN THE CITY RANCHO CUCMA9NGA AND MAKING FINDS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. M Roadrunner Enterprises has filed ;:h application for the approval of Development Review 85 -54, described above in tna title of this Resolution. j (ii) On January 10, 1986, a notice of incompleteness was sent to the applicant regarding the above - described project. Attached with the letter was a 1st outlining the additional information needed prior to finding the anal "ration cpmplete. Despite the incompleteness of the project, and at the request of the applicant, the project was scheduled for Technical Review Committee and Design Review Committees review on February 18, 1986 an6 February 20, 1986 respectively. Both the Technical Review Committee and the w Design Review Committee reviewed the project on those dates and determined the proposed project was not in accord with the objectives of the Industral Specific Plan and the General Plan, and did not recommend approval. Thereafter, on February 24, 1986, a follow -up letter was sent to the applicant summarizing the Technical Review Committee and the Design Review Committees comments with a list of items that must be completed prior to forwarding the project to the Planning Commission for review. On April 16, 1986, a notice of incompleteness for the revised flood report was sent to the applicant and the engineer representing the applicant. To date, the applicant has not responded to or submitted revised plans that address those items as listed in the February 24, 1986 letter, rior the April 16, 1986 letter. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occured. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS FOUND, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: M This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A of this Resolution aro true and correct, (ii) That the required information has not been supplied by the applicant where it is necessary to prepare a legally adequate environmental document. r.. PLANkING 60MAISS10Ni RtSOUTION N0. OR 85 -54 - ROAt1RItNNEfP' F >„ August 13, 1988 , Page. 2 r;. (iii that the required information without which the City's decision to approve a project would not be supported by substantial evidence. (iv) That a proposed project without an adequate drainage study for providing mitigation measures for flood protection that would subject people and property to water- related hazards, such as flooding. (v) Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth above, this Com. ission heresy d!r.les, without prejudice, to refile the Development Review. (vi) The Dep4 \ty Secretary to this Commission shall certify through �. the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADPP')TD THIS 13TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1486. PLANNING COMMISSION OF VHE'CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ennis L. S ou , aifioA F ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary I I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do bereEy certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, - ;assed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of t ",e City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of August, 19b5, by the fd0owing vote -to -wit; AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: �/0 11 11 DATE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT August 13, 1986 Chairman and Members of the P1 anni ng Camni ssi on Brad Buller, City Planner Howard Fields, Assistalt Planner DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 9226 - HILL /WXLLIAMS - A rsview of tuilding elevations or 46 single family detached homes within an exi sti pg residential subdivision of 69 lots on 15 acres in the low Residential District, located on the northwest corner of Highland and Carnelian - APH 1062-621 - 03 through 71 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTLIN: A. Action Requested: Approval of building elevations. B. Project Density. 4.6 dwelling units per acres. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: or - Existing single amt y residences, Low Residential (2-4 du/ac). South - Vacant, Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac).. East - Existing single family residences, Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac). West - Exi sti ng si ngi a family resi depces, Low Resi denti al (2 -4 du /ac). D. General Plan Designations: Project mate = LOW Residential (2 -4 du /ac). North - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac). South - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac). East - Low Residential (2-4 du /ac). West - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac). E. Site Characteristics The project site is vacant with weeds and grasses, sloping at approximately 4% grade. All street improvements are currently in place with a perimeter block 'wall along Carnelian Avenue. There are no known cultural or historical values associated with this site. ITEM B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 9225 - HILL /WILLIAMS August 13, 1986 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The subject property was approved on March 18, 1976 as ,i residential subdivison of 64 lots and accompanying elevations, by the County of San Bernardino. Presently, Lots 1 through 23 are built and occupied. The applicant is reqL_sting complete development of the remain?ng 46 lots. This request is for design review only and consists of three (3) different floor plans with three and four bedrooms, two full baths, and three -car garages ranging from 2,186 square feet to 2,485 square feet on minimum 10,000 square foot lots. The architectural program has nine (9) comtemporary Mediterranean style ei evati ons with red S -ti 1 e roofing material and beige stucco exterior. B. Oesi_e Review Committee: The Committee recommended approval of Elie design elevations vaEions with minor revisions such as providing architectural treatment to all two -story elevations, particularly elevations along Carnelian and Highland, upgrading the existing block wall along Carnelian to include pilaster columns and decorative cap, and special landscaping treatment at the corner of Highland and Carnelian. The Committee expressed concerns with views into to rear yards from abutting two -story houses and required a line of sight study-at the north and west property lines to show the grade relationships. The study indicates that dense tree landscaping will be necessary to mitigate views into re. yards (see Condition No. 4). The applicant has responded with the appropriate changes. Color drawings and material sample board will be provided for your review at the meeting. III. RECO MME NDATION• Staff recommends approval through adoption of the at Eacheff- ResoTu -Von with Conditions. " Rey x('h ' B a Buller City Planner BB:HF:ko Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" Site Utilization Map Exhibit "C" - Approved Site Plan Exhibit "O" - Conceptual Landscaping Plan Exhibit "E" - Elevations Exhibit "F" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "G" - Site Line Study Exhibit "H" - Nall Details Resolution of Approval with Conditions B -Z r r ol * Samf i ► \/ • `' On JP .� s�uYrr,w t � �► % i ..y li ��.1115 � - �� •� 1 FC ��1 T NORTH CITY • F-Xfil ♦ • t C--tly U-44"bped �A 1 � %0 ow Exist CITY OF .7 2, V- RANCHO CUTCAMONGA. PLAINNINtU, EXHIBIT.- M% LE- APA ks 00m I cLirrw* tkxjevobw --------------- w - . X71 is T n u ` � � - � �r'� © Q e �� Q to O C •Q to t! • `� r re a w � — � - -w I NORTH CITY or,, PL.AjNNI1' DNISION T '' 13 -.5' EXHIBIT, --ct!�- sct,LE- CITY Or, rrF,N,I- -171 r'�LMC 0 CLTQ4,,Moj'��G. TrrLz. - OA�rE raew#4- �gwbx�;- PLAANNljN:(; DIVIS"tON SQ NLE- 'i �q OA ■Ifs %iYi /1.{i 151 ©I 0 • V • NORTH CZ'�T OF ITF.,�I. ' Z AN O CLTO OINGA Tau. /,q,-.-,ewg � PL►�Ii�iI\G DIVbM -y „ r EXHIBrr.= ._.SC\,LE= r �► NORM CITY QF RAXCZ-�p C���CAMONGA TrrL. -: - -. PLAt�ii�ItitiG iiIVfS"K?:V _� F.VHIBIT -. i 1 CITY OF RANCHO PL.A.IMIj�G DiVLSiC7�'�f El INMTH dh MINI: TIT'I -: �' iJATio s' EXH [MT. �. -- �_ SC LE: ,..�...a..e..... .fir__ ---� w, Mullm o �> NORTH Atk CITY or, R.A.hCI-D CUCA IMONGA. TITLE ^- r=r�"� ' i✓ ' PLA IV�II�G DRr SnN ii Icl �4 MUM. Qi�[��C 2.1 di.l.11d.t �ia�rio�•�uw , 'rdaloycata Y + - �]. } �!`JiwMytMlltts�l������i�•�. �t an" . i"..0 L.' - t\rOR'1.1 -I CITY OF rrEtit I�..A1� C O CUCA.1MONGA. 'rrrLE- PLr �Ti Tt \ "G DWS011 /.ter' EXH.81T: 11 1 Nam CITY o RAN CL:`,�AM0ITGA rrFN l: ` PLAiNNING LxNISiC N ,�Cv E�CHIWT: " SG10E: C • [w 4 ;'9• tierror as nr�eaa set raaa tar a..." t taw fiatror fi CTlaa [Y I ': rrr�eaa rl4r Taaator aras� -c -r- i t,w _ fieflar a.a. rrrecuaZARTAA.° oiuiaa _ 9 MRTTT CITY OF r 2&1: RANCIJO CI CtiMONGA zt- ' PLAl�1iVi \G Drv&aN �� EXHIBIT.- SGtIE_ l,,...�.•. •. ...�; .t,�•. =^!�e�p'r,oanet.^Y,T:. .a... - .:,,,: � _.:. �- _... -.:... _ .. _. �+J4""3F'y;y; °+",' 4 � iit[ 7RH4a( ra .r �. -ewe. Rw l:Rx.4v � + RW IR �jtl i.bf IN - wx4M4�1 /pHyy,d tail � 4 4+nll )� 4Rt Lf e+iM! M aar,�.y t . 1 ,.,e r a s� r uaattve .w.er —� t t;r i 4 . I NORI CITY Or' 4 RANCHO Gt,CAMOiN - TrrLE: S✓7w .. PLAiyNi \ "� DIVISiO��t �Gs`�'''E _�y ,v �wnp E:CHIB `�_ SCALE= ".�" i6 it 3111 W, "a BRw m— 1r..•v ..rt :. r<r ir . . S.fr I— x.w trer r -.Grrr Y.ItyhYeKY !O+'fL (fsYAe/k.6 llrrr�v.r) �.t SYtrtt aea lr tears � 1 IN .� xntnw nrn /a iN.ru rw v l;' (uatws rri%41,r1 scar, I•.+1'Nt�...s. ' Tartorr Art � q .wrr nl. t vx4 n.-s na, isro ar.r wt r.•ns+rr Yei+MC rtw.cy !«.� rx a..Aa s KI/,MfllY ITa'.+M1M IW nt +nvwYr 1 W Vl WttW.. +K +u�t.M a rlM.rr� a wN.N rrr ..fr ..• .sworr n I.esl I.VAMt MnxY MltKr.; 1. Nmf A5Y GSU/MG r 4 N AUIW W TYf SYr iMf eI TsY /tlfNr.MxY TAY tsunfl— N s. f(pR N?f Y• sA'? 1.,! d fR MMr LMd .T 41 .�ni+M'sISLL�C /W 1rinNM /`IY✓ N YIfiKCi- ' CIS' or, PLAIMMINc DIVISON 3-19 TT•E1tiI 1','Oa a e i _Sr [Tft I LrIMStIgN/yt 4[ arASl __ELEYIY /atI vwr +.� ✓n.reursttswr. •� �.� +wrtatannU� � •. 4 5f NORTH CITY ar� i 7 T T • 1 ++�'t= /I'G/��ri �Ab 6•ai PL.AINNit1'G DfVtSt N FYI ttl3cr: `r5� I ® 'l RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAM,ONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT NO. 9225 LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HIGHLAND AND CARNELIAN IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 12th day of dxly, '986, a complete appl icati+ filed by Richard Ge ;ize4 for nevi ea* of tie above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 13th day of August, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above- described project. ,VOW, THEREFORE, the Ranc,o Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as fol1 ows: . SECTION, 1: That the following can be met: k 1. That the proposed project is consistent wit; tte objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed use is in accord xith the objective of the Development Code ane the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and 3. That the proposed use is in c ^- -,,fiance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements =in the vi ci ni ty. SECTION 2: That O-esign Review for Trait 9225 is approirold subject to the following cond itions and attached Standard Conditions: I. Decorative walls shall be prov; ded along Carnelian and corner side yards along Highland. Submit decorative wall elevation and details to City Planner for review and approval, prior to issuance of building pami t. 2. Provide special landscaping entry statement at the corner of Highland and Carnelian (i.e., rockscape, annual color, accent trees or shrubs). 3. Provide architectural treatment around windows to all elevations, particularly along Highland and Carnelian. 4. Provide dense landscaping along north and west prope °ty lines (15 gallon trees, 15 feet on center ). '3—,Fl PLANNINGICOMM15SIO R1 WKTI:ON NO, DESI'CN REVIEW FO i�RACx 92$ August 13, 1986 Page 2 5., P rovi,de eci al 1 0 sP an scaptrug treatment ai ong uarnel Ian and Highland Amen�ue, such as, accent trees, shrubs, and groundcover. y 6. Provide a 6' high masonary block wall along the north boundary line. Prior to the issuance of grading p.errnits, `? the appl i c4nt shawl l submit accu `rate plans of al 1, existing and proposed fences and ' walls along, the western tract boundary to avoid the creation of unu r. nuisance „areas between doubl "all s. APPROVED AND ADOPTFO THIS 13TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY C'r RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: I Dennis-I:. Stou C ai rman ATTEST: Brad a er, ueputty Secretary I� 1, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregcing.Resolution was duly end regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Caiunission held on the 13th day of August, 1986, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS:- ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: .pi U itrd UpCLIY > O= pgg Y'�q O '•p vY. G V D.G I V• -�U�' V V N 00 GU O I dN wwuU y q 6V nU AC C9d 6 >ydp2'py'O Oy.. ptdOCC O ae nt °q O6 Es`+6 E ^Y N bu0OIU n Yr C v y^ XTU On L Cy q E >• o u •^ V C T�' C� .O Lai d03« V VY.yy C. 4 €ru YVW C7U^ O N y.n .- d••• �•• U d uC N C ^Y N � Lp 6 A N nl; UV�. -..gMg 16— gO cu -0 E O° �Y�L>•M 2 °qC V�Y. d p4 u�q YCE�'a GC A CN E U MLC 7;-V L6p ?qd dL01_a O�E.N Y =..2a OjO�ubuO u «.ry CjN uAU� X L• EE9 y. p °Yg dS Wy.L O. �:q QO•u4.. +d^ U •!' CON OA.d GQ d G V i E a0 � u� Egg�s a ^y ya E U^ V E � p 6A V W N V Xag p N^ N N A CaLVi V9u��ON. dC 4C ^ ° `C� bn1^ d06 O ♦u_'� S bo N 1 0> V d O N uytV ca'^ n G GB OVY�U.. EL y U ENd o d�rd pOa O. p •C C L' ..3 NC> bE 1 dOaNi uyC Cw JE o• .'°� L.. ny LS�2 W E d VU tu^ <•NNT 1� NL G^ w-O <Ou d T U A p 69 3 N L b= W f 0 N ^6 'Y« G N r Y +L• 3 6 0 R C .00 G L 64.1 0 1 V O � 2 r M ° 3 n o � I u W Y O +y < J Z w'd G� p CN •dl+Olyt LO •� V }o ^ «7C.6n• EE a ut mYp°.an 2 •C-LO Lo d Rd6 n EEN2 uN �� V n re n ao.^d� °u�C•a•N J °O st W .Q i U qQ9 �p y apa ^= Ny am v b y d d ^A °E tE. w qcy € ^N ud �auyd Nai"d Sb.. .v i d 6 N ONy EQ9 dam' H .V..~. J •-1 N � O M..C.eC �� oaT+CY d%yN � R al N�v.W9 . 4r�dN u�a� n9 uY^ v3 L1n � n.q oil o4 a« La•» µV =... >•_ -^ NVG Ab •,,, �3 V'y li r�u °N brE •wY• «�NH.- YLD. 6C dry YN �L�' L C a m•E-C dOnK3 yC GN =- Cub =1. aYya. cT b A Y dodq n P>. A yuN O L V.:•,y1 � � ' C r^N»-G E+yuyOY .N7•D^ i E c^ o Y 24 A Nd µu >- NL4AO C N Md MqN - r » V O Y O N q oL PcgD w ^Q PO N.O+ 3 I.W. y yDibNd Lei >N,� Lam. n b^ DPW +N+ Lden4 A^. m„G, c° wK^G „ Q GN Via q C D » Y NL ata . 99YA. Y fl= wN d-• A `»c r te C 6maAE 2c ` u n ^fOS G L ~AL"Y +G u F ' �w = o PrN.cw0.' C e6 v.�- .� `N o . ac Ei y j .p y U 4:»•r drn «N =o 1. .y9 GM- dr YFd W oD . ,t nLa ^ a DI p C PL. qpY dNl� G 'p ^. F. GuSi. C.N. Py VVdO c w� v” cFib ° on ❑. ,Gaon ab+ vOm .. -�•-� L 1 ^Ad 'J��O dq � y ^Cyi >CyA ..E. - q �d O aq N N t e c1- °`'^ a ac Nzcl'^• .J N 19 CC. ..Y+Dry LAd N Q.-4 .GC db CEdCE + CdH Yn O.� «9 NFµNN AdyY ^tY dE «GUr Y�7a N V N G N^ • d 6F 6 C ^ Y O � d � y L M N ^n TT. tlf o C R_ n= D Y CY UU '•T g3p1'a CL. O•� ratio. c.N_ N « 61u .C.. Vy..�. ^A� VO� »YU cay,E ��.°.F* d�� ^`9' L4,.,,•° -v Nsa.� «� °c .Li «L'.gwN u�G «•" �c vO V 9 i • A C r E d s '^ b« dy �~ C� O c MW t L Y q AN UCY LN y..GC.t L Qmd� a N D c C 4L�Cf6 Nt C•.NQ �RdE 4U.'O •-.N RO�Ndi�q.O. Lp tiy+�yN 1"F40t.gY d .I V Yu 'b 'O Td IT Gi aW Yew .w+. U..d TC.dC ba+ V EJW olub dp _. [� D° S. 4a Sr u e- n NL emu Ga.': -� ,_6 DY Y au av i � 1 °u aY`wp �v F'^ °` dD D. .LOO4. i+wo ° u "._, ei Nb '° •u• yi,�N Via. �f \Mj um « N•^DYU =a'c.o om b.N-n .�A° E. A:°. �o �i � `~ d 9 d^ 9 Y ' P •^ � C'Y d d c y'^, O N t N� d ^ L a Z d ..C.o AM U tiG� v ad,o Nrr O. aui W y Ki"•aLi >.da L !N9 4 NSS� 9L y 41 U vO.M G. dy LN41. —.21 6g � U d yT.c. d ,.. '++Std X�t W •r9 c ^4paG •rw) My A MYdd of @r W•� N u.u.+. .GV yea Nb V Q O^ d dt M! ti r 41 L Y n Y F P �. i, =• C N ^Y C� 4vddi N �VY la'Cd • �� N.q i V id2vC. Cdf 4 O cW �yE =p • d y Crg NAy Va` LL ca ? L?pp O.. •OaN 7 T u T =6fJ oNLd N R .per NE> O Cr- a NTNLNUN Ltdc TqD '•'•o d� i NdO.t ,^..Q �nNG� d�4�d C ^C'O BjY�wN yOYA .YU °^� C 6 oq � d d W e Ap *� C y �.DO�6N. Y »"O G~ N »idCN dip ••nn V A t y� �� TN�•La�VYa �' nNUd LL d d� P aE. Cg9p0.R C^ Gm. y yDl . A N W G F t � G ss33 d AZY.y dTp N N 1 Q M y�^ Y +�.. d�Ctr. i6'Cy d C w a.• 3 '>` C C. d.�+N3 7Y �D >' yc. y Y p AO cw94 Y d ^ M A N y NC N•O � � C..—N. �a. �L..O- VuA tb nuyyjWYM �Y LgGX4 — Rn0 .�Ftw Ta L C g N ^CUNL O d W d dd P.y r� M y EE V N S 4 V � r+yL u304N T p 4L ^ C E dE V M b.E WTdv �+ L q Obi L°.dN E O Y 9 s G �Y 9 c Y A —_ lEY6 Ld1 �A`.n U. . 80- �pp GA"Z! v 92 mist WV � L nd u•r dr w°wNd+D.+°P 64 m.G Y L91d•'� �G Q11¢�L Mmp u466 U M..C.eC �� oaT+CY d%yN � R al N�v.W9 . 4r�dN u�a� n9 uY^ v3 L1n � n.q oil o4 a« La•» µV =... >•_ -^ NVG Ab •,,, �3 V'y li r�u °N brE •wY• «�NH.- YLD. 6C dry YN �L�' L C a m•E-C dOnK3 yC GN =- Cub =1. aYya. cT b A Y dodq n P>. A yuN O L V.:•,y1 � � ' C r^N»-G E+yuyOY .N7•D^ i E c^ o Y 24 A Nd µu >- NL4AO C N Md MqN - r » V O Y O N q oL PcgD w ^Q PO N.O+ 3 I.W. y yDibNd Lei >N,� Lam. n b^ DPW +N+ Lden4 A^. m„G, c° wK^G „ Q GN Via q C D » Y NL ata . 99YA. Y fl= wN d-• A `»c r te C 6maAE 2c ` u n ^fOS G L ~AL"Y +G u F ' �w = o PrN.cw0.' C e6 v.�- .� `N o . ac Ei y j .p y U 4:»•r drn «N =o 1. .y9 GM- dr YFd W oD . ,t nLa ^ a DI p C PL. qpY dNl� G 'p ^. F. GuSi. C.N. Py VVdO c w� v” cFib ° on ❑. ,Gaon ab+ vOm .. -�•-� L 1 ^Ad 'J��O dq � y ^Cyi >CyA ..E. - q �d O aq N N t e c1- °`'^ a ac Nzcl'^• .J N 19 CC. ..Y+Dry LAd N Q.-4 .GC db CEdCE + CdH Yn O.� «9 NFµNN AdyY ^tY dE «GUr Y�7a N V N G N^ • d 6F 6 C ^ Y O � d � y L M N ^n TT. tlf o C R_ n= D Y CY UU '•T g3p1'a CL. O•� ratio. c.N_ N « 61u .C.. Vy..�. ^A� VO� »YU cay,E ��.°.F* d�� ^`9' L4,.,,•° -v Nsa.� «� °c .Li «L'.gwN u�G «•" �c vO V 9 i • A C r E d s '^ b« dy �~ C� O c MW t L Y q AN UCY LN y..GC.t L Qmd� a N D c C 4L�Cf6 Nt C•.NQ �RdE 4U.'O •-.N RO�Ndi�q.O. Lp tiy+�yN 1"F40t.gY d .I t"J t is \T� • --eCiY L'd ^� a yi .00 gCCtL OIILS? L V YC Ca^ n�D9 OI T >pl- CVi°r y Z ND. Vr� E� .' -o�O °LOA I L qV QD Y .�I b0 ^O EN a9 ar bpR Z NF'.w^ AYM .b.. •a y�.lb `� ^pnV a t.Y- 1QLa •1'7 ^au� A 1O xbu Eq. �y q r wr N Y c9 v b y N N° Y Y w b ° D ory ObtI.O L O Lu -.t a E 1 Nv0 Y° �Z L r Met AqC -x N0.0 N u. C trs GOON PL,^.LO ub UO~ LL O^ N G 0 6.0 � T ° .•C- 1+ _ANY p G1 P 1j l NAM CNV� � Y >A 001 °N 1 ��0 R .•C. -° a. WN�Lui Nla"y r '9 �t t-Y O0. b b O ; Old ~L�' -0ON 6•' Cd. O NOa Q1J p1'C r t°Y w� nti 7O L Aq Y C °C t aY tai1Y � 1 d 6N O.. G 4°. A. V q L C 0-r L 0 • 1 N V I•. CE ° b.L C TO16OM ^ N q 4 N .- �Y 6 N 3 N. O H.O L Wr9Y yy 9 F y r 4 N u^ r P Y N u °d li O N p'. 71 I ` � 1 I � a Y Y A N Y V q ^� C N Y Yq ^ O L� q..L •- 9 � N 6 > a o •n .Le u • Z� "-CC• q� N 6 d CL A� NwN o1wYG� N m F d Y 0p1,♦1 C A n� CC F N p M Sy O blr 0. W b0.~ y0 Y�� ._ C a. a CAL 1y �.. qy^ �6O q L yw1C Y Yy9 EU YI •C- L OA �j uy„�. r' a Y LC. d'. 016..°. Y OO1C N „L, n Y N� M C1V r T Ga a ~L aplu Yq2 DE y qwr.' N u• NO q O �tp r�o0 L4. ROLb. L d �L _C b Y UV R 0.q 62 N� °- U La ON IqN •� Z tail '^c bu q^ L> a L 3.r my.L aN pA ^E du wo no qua" A YOc w• yag+y u °Od. rt r+ y. E� 4 w t° p � n � b � V W 0 0^ Y L r u t1.. Y^ �tw. LO C V LpC ^.q ED pq C�.it pb'^+- -oqR e° bL.Q{ Ny q�Nb as __ YNO E�y ^.ANN ug bqL n >.R$ N AY �tOC ua to G� q.• N _CR +Y+O 9aua'^W YE4, N�C��y� qY6 C 6^R d.> b °O 0.L ��-Cb tdn .0. N^ CLy O1� �E YL UA N YL ub .0 ^ YOU 'CJ MM brp ^,�Y a OtAC4 1C V CN.n N ^ ay�'o pYp C N L' nle"�`_• N9A LR •'a Y °C L0 ,..,N 6 N o m $ Y A < b W KLn 1= 6 N $'^ �z �uu .^. Yb.Oyq C >L b^ n K Ll V 9 O O L �• 0. TG V..bba �- L g 0 0 1 � G GN6A WS 6u Ulw tr a' rtI tNl. �I sI ml 9 N �I t"J t f `^ B � N Z 41 5 U m n O L CL d�y dYa O i L L O m G .4. u o✓ E • d Gd V •Vd p � 9 ^O�TE'�w E NU �` n E �^ L o• QO y E VO ALa• ...OLV .may �a> A LN 4. VCd vU, y =U O� Y ar0 W LN 4 V a y A y O V i WA 2 p C •.. •Q Y Ly .,� Ed V+• Auk+' C �� 4�O a�OW� L1 x 1- .VDU A VYO. dd CL can a S ° V.q^ L N y K U a d p. y p 0 O •tea � ryOry11 � x N m W n O. N T Y L Eq. Op'. t °b. yUC _ � .b J u�dY 6..L m0.. 01•rW 4 � �A U AO4 CT C^ V �.- y00 A4•N CQ•.. L E'dN qAd � „a„�'•.t U� A ++ V •L.o L N u ti.. Q O 6 5. •+ M C d ^yn U'. W.0 Y E. LaO = V qU O u ^ O �Y AY6 �R y L rU A P ,^�C6 Md'^ 6�•s•6O y u O O V.c Tay �i �C? yAT. 4 W A Nd V y y A O L 2 0 A • 9 N QI O c d L r 0 q Y^ 9 L 4 7,7 y N 4U2i� 'O '•u'vL W •a m V N EgaN aN,r p,4 aLE ° ° L. ENCO Ly JJJ SUS OOO c� qpn Rl..Z Lp d'A = L' d iN LUIW CTV = V6id rTOV uc1 ° N�O N WYE 'T°A .O O�YEC V '. dy 1-•6 ,,CdCa �RVA 31WN6 HNW H YY°d ^V 1aQaI�N d.^nW0 N L d Ua Y > �f �I ^f Z NI ~I I I �•I W ~f S Z . Ad .°au X Y NC4 u° �..L.y 64 V V n�d LAL qN C3 • MVCni� qA 'V .�- a q L y wUA d Mw A'N 9 SA Cyd ^a °ua N n g E A o� '� C^ Ga . M 6 N L N y, W A> •y V O y ^ T9> A yy m yc� N O GY•'' ..a. ytouEE• L =p °Gi, D•+ a v dyU L N >AAC C� °n ON COQ LO"'m a. e= yu TLS y Aa �y ay= n0 ..0 PM ._ �`. qy a �ymd E LE Y A yy O y`p 9yi 6�Ly 6 L as W V Vds. • nd v°-EO V a.:4 O V C6AYE uG V nU �'�°L p•'O �� wd ' O, dE O N a LAL C N WNya EO. y u _ aN cia.- 'e �+..- `cn SRO •' Nio V'4�.N.,y yC O N m w c q.-.y d � n M a �. N rn• � L L Vp LNVOd .r 3n. -: CAC LOCn,N VO UC .^M aE E° r dU NN y JLA Q rAn. 2da p4N+- E W•. E .2 d'w. v u Ol I N N C _r. U CJ •n 0 Q. 11 soLO q °o c.°.N wnu � A '° NLCIq. 72 «qW V�o uu:o. x. - V e ctrran ay N Y A qw�o A Y mq C� d .°.. «O RV Crt+�gl N.A •- L CG= U t..l LC S L. O CCON d CrN .Qd L C j9 W +. YL. 4°Er�T� O N L O.E nT � G Or OC _ VgNT .•. p � p nc � lYLi �^ �/� = 1 �iU V w� i v o a uu O. L LC • VNY 'E U« u. °tr°irWL� NN YCE 'b CE .\. N..q .anNE b d CY u W r 04 4 W W M TN iO d Ey n CV Ed d gr.. b C y0 EGG O.nAq a • U q vY � Or «i E u0 dZA 6 A q~ T Z A V N. O q N d G � y. a T� V 4 r •� a� O ?�..r'!a S'^ d9 N Y Y PN C1w W bdC -J° A U ( r�N L •� .0 O a NrA _•E_ p� A.Oa P Cq d C C'C •E O T d L d LA � L � ` W � O ,pV G d N L T O O nip O N� p y.F�L d Gc �.E ° • Y � 60L .0 Lpd 0 a "an n UN c N ~ C W O 0 L^ L A w V V. f b d C 00 O GV- LN CY at <VY'. LOS x Al' J' N •'/ O N C I [ ) b I YU.N Ob A^ P 9^ « E C LQ «qW C~ V a =b N Y ab. b qw�o LY Y mq C� ° U `^ ^ .a- V q A O Y L = a 6 % N G L C j9 p '^. OAAC 6 by T'i� TOG a C d'eO «S Cr9`O N C b N R.-pb. M.r.. atA A ma nc VY`Oa C 'fl Ama'.a�cq V T'L ° Vb � ^ � b L' i � U N� • A q.x CG a n A Ya YVu.� 6 °NVq C q y �a°i.. pb �.rC avr= vn = ad A Aa u A6 V u NCNq QN O C 'CW d'O C L° EOE.d O OC r ur�rr y d y�j C CA�r°. A Y Nb AND • a6 � A _N 'OYO� WVy� .N CdONj YyYp vd a= yE —.°� dE. �'emv v� ° T• G d O d. �` a a «« r uoy y p C •� ^ 4 °A Y. VAC H V d t V= C N L N q O N y y Lp i �u c i. v O ^po �.� q .0 Lpd 0 a "an n UN c C ° z .290 YU.N Ob LL PM 07 pONd Ld YaP yy , ° �rV -ua�sA OVL'N p L . qE �A EL L C .G `y N L62r.U.N A-3 V Ui r 6V'O� p 6 rL0 q. O N O d ONTrAQ O 6� E S L W N 9 N W Y Y 1•I :g n A A .4 1.1 a Yf b u IA v m .ry L 0 i ° m w 0 d C 1 w j I P L L « s` G..P. L a La rq _L M Oy L dq3 a a- L N O 6 �yq duo° e €�vw u °Lc `o d siON u q9 u a a� N �., a• Y 6 LS t1 O� N� 6 0 I 'v «roc o !oo oa: r:adti a ooa.a= L ny. �. y acnl 4L C N o ^ •. 6a C O dp �� q a yL. p Off. Y � N V a. � _ GUU�4 y0yr .�O 6 u P O YP.r Yw ■ 4. Ceg N C L Q ay9. = E V� o`.• iy n-� N PS tl!Y N co a's^� "v d1ONO u L sqy: �'u QU .s+a ,,, N.c •'a gaNaP I= i. S. «. r qqu °T' Q d�Ec. •.Y.V 6 4W n w N 4 I fin. dq 4P'i. ws x o opq.°N uCC N. QY !L of V^ Q�b C� QOL � CE�iLppp qb CO V. L9 CV S L , aW 4� U W E a t O N n.�:n L u C. _pyti• b•rygM q yCd quvCN i4•r -G1 9��V Z Y"� OV•^MN Yaibq .C4 as W•r �L�.__ F�L �C 0>+ tj U ^M f. Lam^ n-+r l�qy �� t.�L+ V L O CT ac �.y �qay O V L1.1 ^yy•L cLL •y • c ^yp °�N.Q qA.0 P aP N dL tea';^ ^y7 1 �; is ^t ^NM } a V p n Ny Y C L dd � C qNL t Yq,p cU. �E hu'L. dbMs NiPa Y 5 L CP p V L Yr• O' � P. yViG% nbW° ndp,N 4� ff` Et ° L~� Dr+ga L CQ.-0 d nE °, p°.•L.= CL x L !L Ct V ~6�� � � c� � O tt --'-a C °O qiY. mod . xL'r c p p� '6L y� ~Ln qN L! »q - pp qa,n� G i.Yq u•^ y c. ! d vZ ^- iuc �6��ae .xqn Y+S+Q L dt YT ONV N� �rqi W »� IN C c' N 64iN� 66Y=iV Y�iD�M ")9 LWy •C 41 QY yNw WM U. Y Y•1 qY Ol R 0 i ° m w 0 d C 1 w j I P L L « s` G..P. L a La rq _L M Oy L dq3 a a- L N O 6 �yq duo° e €�vw u °Lc `o d siON u q9 u a a� N �., a• Y 6 LS t1 O� N� 6 0 I 'v .dc- d c r• " as a a ny. �. y acnl 4L C N o ^ •. 6a C O dp �� q a yL. p Off. Y � N V a. � _ GUU�4 y0yr .�O 6 u P O YP.r Yw ■ 4. Ceg N C L Q U 6 Q = E V� o`.• iy n-� N PS tl!Y N co a's^� "v v °d .N.•a P�P L sqy: °arn� =° oa c mQ SEW I fin. dq 4P'i. ws x o opq.°N uCC N. QY !L of V^ N N /•1 0 i ° m w 0 d C 1 w j I P L L « s` G..P. L a La rq _L M Oy L dq3 a a- L N O 6 �yq duo° e €�vw u °Lc `o d siON u q9 u a a� N �., a• Y 6 LS t1 O� N� 6 0 I AML q4 C.0 �. ud np q bwY u V � 2; •p � .:: i� � g N y A« 6 n NC v a OV p Y N W 6 i u N g g2� u _ _ ' 0.9 4 L ^ p IT i 0. �.. Nv u. Y N y U p L M uu Np. T 4 YN xG °c Ra pc °u q Y e L cYU o p .. Gu Yd �d � Ci � 20 N N7 GU J�9 �.iu .... u L • u o 2 Nlw• tm ° A 4 t c i+. Lgcv.c „a -Z 2 V p^ vET qo j Y «« nr Yui F V y 4G� id CO 6Y 4°u Y °d 6M� ^01.. � » 07 OWN 6r-N Iz tld 6 6 .4 N G I�� V pL,j3y f Y � O t7I 6. Y a°i v w d ° O d E N du '0 d iLy,� N u ° i =o y v c do � Lvdi pl Ca k Y e W t N d7 CV S� d G g YM N E L AD pN ° wn..c ... 8t Yi _ ^` .GY w Y Q r M'� 6 °.° L..c. E O W ,r d•^ yZd Ny Y u O y�v Vd 'O aTi. qa '�_ a d+o od qo ua G ^� 9 LN n e..4 L cse YE¢R V V4.. r Np�N uN Op Ut..c. yW YW� 4C. V 4 iAt ae C U�gyL 2L >a Oa 4' pCp Lu� Q L� Zt= C uvN NYpp�C 4p.V L� YEG CL A H9 ••• . p GGN <� J iC q O uT r Y yt >fU t.d 6v { d Ij f S 1 C— CITY OF RANCHO CU6AM4 ,�,°'�,A y STAFF REPORT�o��cnM�;vc = O O Z IV DATE: August !3, 1986 1977 k TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission a: FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: FINAL TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 10088 - FRIED14AN 1HOMES - A residential su v ii9n o acres Znto 1 singe famiiy tots in the Very Low Density Residential District (less than 2 du /ac), generally located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Carrari Street - APN 201- 07 -14, 37, & 455. I. BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting a 12 month time extension or Ten a ve Tract 10088, as described above. The project was originally approved by the Planning Commission on October 13, 1982. Subsequently, the Planning Commission approve,.;' two tim_ extensions, the most recent of which extended the Tentative Map to October 13, 1986. This is the final twelve month time extersi on available. II. ANALYSIS: At the time of reviee, for the first time extension,_ staff i entified the follow, :!q ir__ -)nsistencies with the basic development r- Aadards for the Very Low Residential District: average lot size, lot width, lot depth, frontage, and solar access (see August 22, 1984 Staff Report). These items were nn- considered to be .0 - nificant by. le Planning;_ COmmissi01i and the Commission approved the time exten�lon. No new inconsiste`;cies have been found since this tract`s ';ast time i extension approval. On April 2, 1986, Friedman Homes submitted an application for a new tentative tract map at the same location. While the net application is not complete at this time, initial reviews nf %ne j project indicate that the proposal will consist of a cus,.m lot subdivisioi: of 127 single family parcels, it appears to staff that the applicant is requesting an extension of Tentative Tract 10088 to provide an option in the event that the new appli ca ti cn is not acceptable to the City. IIII i ITEM 'C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPMT Tentative Tract.10088 - Friecman Homes August 13, 1986 Page z 4- III. REC%WNDATION: Staff recommends that the P1�6 ing commission gran e nal twelve month time: extension for this project t 5 through the adoption of the attached Resolution. tf Ily su tzed, Res ectfully subm.Ltted. Brad Bul I er City Planner BB:SM:ns Attachments: Letter from the Applicant (July 23, 1986) Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" - Tract Map Original -Resoluti-n of Approval with Conditions of Approval'- Resolution of kiorow-1 s, Time Extension 2 r p 4� July 23, 1986 �77" -- RECEIVED —. � CVT OF RANCHO CIMIAMONGA FUNNING DIVISION' AM JUL 21 1986 PM Mr. Brad Buller City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: Tract 10088 Dear h-•. Buller: Please find enclosed a cheek for $62.00 and payable to the city of Rancho Cucamonga 'or an erttensiun of time for Tlentative Trpet 10088. The tract is lo,,ated'on the northeast cor _ , of Archibald Avenue and Carrirt Street. Wa ara retr-esting th:s extension of time to comply with prov;siop-, of the jubdivision Map Act which deal with extending the life of a tentative map. We will anxiousiy await the receipt of the n::r ,Gary paperwork froi. your department confirming the approval of this rtguest. 1..f you have any questions or concerns V; as do nc -; WAtate to call me. Sincerely, Martin Dowd Forward Planner MD:mh 4455 ROWLAND AVE. _ FL MONTE, CALIFORNIA 91731 (818) 579-1430 9 i NORTH CITY or ITEM:�. Ol% LLtC ©LTAjj�IG`T�A Ally- PLANNING DIVISION 9 EXHIBIT , -A SCALE: `• Cry F 1 mu 9, CITY oil, PLANNING DIVEK-N L' E KHIMT SGELE 14d : RESOLUTION "10 82 -93 .r A IESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM'.�NCA, 'CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVI;I TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 10088 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 10088, hereinafter "Map" submitted f by Nicosia, ,Webb and Sutter, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City 'of Rancho Cucamonga, County a; San Bernardino, State of California, d?scrib,i as -i2 acres of land located generally on he northeast curner of Archibald and'Ca:,rari Street and being divided into 1K lots, regularly came before the P.anning Commission for public hearing and action on October 13, 1982; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject: to all conditions set forth in t;,e Engineering and' Planning Division's rep,. ^ts; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has raail and considered >`he- Engineering dnd PI;nring Division`s reports and has considered other evidence' presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes tip following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 10083 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is Lonsistent with 311 applicable interim and proposed general and spy.cific plan,; (b) The design or improveaents of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and spedific plan,, ,c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design c7 the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health probicgs; (f) The design of the tentative tract wiTi not conflict with any easemert acquired by the public at urge, now of record,, for access through or use of the property within, t�. iroposed subdivision. E,° k Resolution No. t. Page 2 _ o F (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on or the environment and a Negative De3laration_ s 1 issued. - x° SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 100881 a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions •` and the attached Standard Conditions: ,' PLANNING DIVISION .. 1. This approval shall become null and void, if tlie ` Tentative Tract Map is not approved and recorded withi.. twenty -four (14) months of this approval, unless an extension is granted by the Planning Commission. l 2: Front yard setback lines shall: je recorded on cul- de-sac and knuckle lots in accordance with Zoning Ordinance width requirements. 3. Rev,,iw and approval of dwelling units by the Cites shall use the "streetscape" guidelines developed by the applicant in order to create in*__ est and variety to the community appearance: 4. The Community Trail along :rchibald shell not be greater than twenty (20) feet in width as measured from the ultimate Garb location. 5. The landscape accents shown on the conceptual lands :ale plan shall be installed and bonded fat, > - with th.e streL t improvements. 6. A geo� gical report shall be prepared,by a qualified engineer to determine iF there are any active fault traces within the ViLnity of the project site. If traces are fodrd, then all dwellings for human habitation shall be setback fifty (50) feet from the fault trace. This report shall be conducted, and reviewed and approved by the City prior to approval of the final map. 7. A local interior feed ?r trail shall be provided along the north boundary at lot 49 and between lot 49 and 50. ENGINEERING DIVISION 8. The developer shall be required to install concrete drainage structures along Alta Loma Channel from its northerly debris basin to the proposed channel at w: wo 9 Resol!Ation No. Page ,g Wilson Avenue and along the watercourse from the terminus of the proposed story drain within the tract boundary to Alta Loma Channel. The cost of thes_ stormdrain ?ge systems shall be credited agzinst the stormdepMage fee for the project and a reimbursement; agreement per City Ordinance 75 will be exe�luted to cover the contributions which exceed the.jfee amount. 9. The above condition shall be %�aived when and if an Assessment District is formj ?d to complete the installation of an improved ch,=,'.nnel. 10. All offsite drainage easements as shown on the Tentative Map shall 'be recorded concurrent with or prior to recordation of the map. 11. The debris basin, diversion levee /channel and flood protection walls as shown on the Tentative Map shall be redesigned to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. - 12. If the ultimate design of the proposed north /south storm drain from the debris basin requires an open channel, the width of easement shall be modifie6 to accommodate it. 13. All onsite stormdrainage systems shall be designed per City's standard specification with an added requirement that velocity - depth prcduct of runoff on the street shall not exceed 6. 14. A minimum of. 26 -feet wide pavement within 40 -foot dedicated right- uf-way shall be constructed on Almond Avenue from the tract boundary to Hermosa Avenue. ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS 15. The final design of the debris basin shall include appropriate safety precautions such as fencing, gates and signs. In addition, landscaping, consisting mainly of trees, shall be planted around the perimeter of the basin. 16. The design of the cul -de -sac along lots 127 -131 shall be redesigned. The project shall provide a minimum of 40 feet of right -of -way and an offset cul -de -sac on the project side. The design of the r !?_ 1_ x ReS Aut =on No. Page 4 f cul -de -sac shall not chiange thz condition or access to existing properties and homes in the area unless an agreement A s reached betweer. landowners. 17. Final 'tndscape and traii plans shall provide for screen,;r +g and buffering of the lots along Archibald through the combination of such things as dense ti 'indscaping, berming and+ walls. Any fencing or wall, along Archibald shall be with like materials whether it is ins4alled by the developer or future owner. M 18. The oak tree near or on lot 131 shall be preserved, 79. Final design of the access and any access barriers to the fire road along lots 76, 77 and 131 shall be coordinat :d through the City Engineer's office and betty en area homeowners, Fire District, and affected utility companies. Final designs shall be reviewed +;nd approved by the City Engineer pri;r to final map approval. r APPROVED ANU ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF OCTOBCR, 1982. PLANNING COMMISSION 0 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: 4)ef r Kit . C r Kit r� ATTE. :� l ecrerary or the Plannigi Commmiss.pn I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Revolution was duly anii regularly incroduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at k regular meeting of the Planning Cosntission held on the 13th day of October, 1982, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: STOUT, BARKER. McNIEL, REMPEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: KING i a 6 4 L W S. O s � G O S J U O 0 a :n 4 q J� U aq. 4 C O N 3 Z .Lq d b aria ' N4 Y V +rq L ;44 „ a .+rs � .K b q:? GY y ". .'q,C L L. ` q y C� w a N y � t. •.� �� tOi �� O Cw � • � 1S .� v4 V T.� .M.C+ £.� wu u= r-• °• «{ aa�n ,�H .v4 O C.q C 4 Rjy4 'Tdi ... U4.., iy ^Q y� 94.: r3A4 rsP uw " -t.oy4 oTN OiQ.i.ic _o ♦-C Nq 6..b qh «.�. u C O ui ro4 W €Va i 4� O r L' C O C.t �y y q x 7jj t 42 K A M..�. bN � na OG f +N V O. tq% r R� S�Gy Q., v <.^•G wU l" 9G Ra N gg�.+. aJP 64 3 V Qy n w= AYOa aY qx Stro � L J �Q9 �5.. U•Dr L y N V wU aE L. GO C SL/C ✓d L.� �� Y VY r U 1� a u bS 4V� w` vVU q v 4• } riSM .nti Er.. CC wUU'�rw -ry U L C� L G) 1 y d C v� ci °y S A Cyst 4p 1f} Cu u'� -rV �% uL C V..O.° L1i OC. R y..b. LS N LAN b ^VL p .M•Y g V w0 Faro W V.... du� �O +� >4 t bw Gr. ZJ ✓MN ya EE k6 ° ysL E aR b Y ` '01 - rte eae Fpap t� ±L'G yc4 O° Lay C a'aq� .r C `Y W O SO Cd LCL .`-4 gOSq ti0 CYS._ A4, [Q b4� Ra+N yrCC MW 4C4 �'G Ld4 °�O ^S 7�e P��� rn ~n 4 N V Vlva+ KnO Rry 'Y',C �tM Nt ...tib O��j \jS rn �y,fiq N NC {.. V u ✓ 4 ,� .� . O d a C 6 .n rsn K +rOr k � �, w O C c L �t� uL we C ^UC . ✓ O C .-2 vi LO � �•.+ who. b ub raCi S _cyDi a NL q a u uY UOu N 40 Y a �6 LV4 c c+ y u C .✓i� 6 � L t} N q N a L V i• u i _ taco 4 j .Ni C V _✓,y n V a $ 2 I= ✓ Y `'• j O ! ^ N L Ca .v> b � pO . D C• D� 6C a N V c a G C O n O nMy= O D D L C �-- a, ,_ _:�L +emu °v °c c ',O •. y_ G u si »- OLLLU S G G v v p L ✓ j a y � 4✓ Ic {_ <� Ov u�� Au Uu +'•.0 suw6u.� ao. h ` GG� ✓.p � �:R nV.. O<U ;.emu _ - _ v� O 6✓ v4 i C� 4 L s r o° L 0Y gal— L:LC ^NL P �L:.w Lb yC q ✓ ap L V q LVh _' L S u•/I C "?° N v ^ � ✓ E �D C ` 4 4 E� y`` � C. uaq `r> N � E` tY. _ �.y � f- €c E a V L f •. - b ° g ✓O G � y Vzi N G u C ". O b -. ty 3 L b E U C Ew S ;E a C r 'u ✓ . ✓u y LAG Lny _ V U ENiu NL� � CCa �) D` Qti C UbC UYV c _StSD �Y VovE r-2� C•n V1 a... ->. G2L O,o� <4m qry jC i Fm C ?4 a... tea: uiti o0'4P ✓C uC^ ou N..4 In c�O�Nv o O C c L �t� uL we C ^UC . ✓ O C .-2 vi LO � �•.+ who. b ub raCi S _cyDi a NL q a u uY UOu N 40 Y a �6 LV4 c c+ y u C .✓i� 6 � L t} N q N a L V i• u i _ taco 4 j .Ni C V _✓,y n V a $ 2 I= ✓ Y `'• j O ! ^ N L Ca .v> b � pO . O C• D� 6C a nMy= c�� a, ,_ _:�L +emu °v °c c ',O •. .°,� L Db GO Dti y > si »- OLLLU cEs +'•.0 suw6u.� ao. h ` LTV ✓.p � �:R nV.. O<U ;.emu Ou C• LN C4 `L✓ s� v4 C= O4+1L r ~ COOIILyv L 0Y `G. L:LC ^NL P �L:.w Lb T3 GN CO vU ✓.s. t Ci ^E CE v �L'. C bq LVh "?° �w�., °�^° •' •"gib ^'D ,1:.0 •^ an IF u'° L awa.O..q iil 7 c c^ c N✓ ti 3a '" = b 4 v ^�✓o a '_,°. �.� ` OC= n q u Y C wry Vzi C ". O b -. ty 3 L b E U � C O c C DL CSC >.G 2L4 C v EE w V v m✓ D � U. N q k D, CO v Civn CO� ✓ k .Y.iO4 •L-•� N Ll Ll ✓ ,.. i .�^v ° S^'• � i , c s � - awn' _ - i. a�C fsOy tvII ✓s _ °� uL+ c° ay n° c ova u N l i g uz -_� ... Ob ttn Cu O _ •.� Cl 00 - >V O --b O IILVI L L EII F u LO V.O V O L b t E gt Cy,y E: M U6-2 _na L NO° On �IIZ u a O ti U- •Oya-L^ r a NL.� °o - a � LC ✓ �GY - - -� '_ _ ao v =tea � c • °_ - :5i.5 Ey cy O ib W 04 auC S�,nO� � C Oa G.^ vn ^LC° o u'j�i'GC O cy Od �'L'i d Y W y��4 cc2a.E fib$- ..L_ �• Q• - vv oe eL° ' E:ZLtG ✓ io c u.N �1. v_ °. e_70_au °�. ' -�... �ViU GyY4 ° •1CGO ✓a0 �"C Y1; - _ _ N� emu- ;C Ca m UN y TL Vu ✓4 - � _ -_ -C 8,c _ = :.�i UGL Cfu2> °ate.. n�II - U nO �fe ..�.� � V puN• �- � OG .^ - O i•Oq S 5 G O. L'3E J C� p.0i L Ta ✓ .` O'S€ L ouE EU L 15 i �^ -t AYL IS- .... -5 L S. `. i y OV. `'� ^� ✓1 �Q l ✓y i CI `� C • N 'I ' V_ y _ E T zw _ 9 6 C•� i.= �� JL ' � �v x �i 6 p 9 C Yy M ° + ° « u ° n i tin u_« a° OL VLL. d W g 2 0 CViF LC Vn«O�LC.y L Pa W J V L E •e~Y 6 7 0 «C _b 2 Y C cTL f�j AU_ ^3ca i i°, qua ua o L nu O C F•O EL � S � �p C 4 Sti � M• £ U F4. t ._ 6� �• rT 6U rY Ka• � u2 4 ° V Y« • ^« 6r V V NODS aF Ou 6 vL "'. A V C V A Vn ,.°_ 70 V N� N 1° Va G.Oi.CC a r u�t 300 O'L «� � 4U LTCxi Y _ E T zw _ 9 6 C•� i.= �� JL ' � �v x �i 6 p 9 C Yy M ° + ° « u ° n Ww •E E O.C9 G V V OL VLL. d W g 2 0 CViF LC Vn«O�LC.y L Pa W J V L E •e~Y 6 7 0 «C _b 2 Y C cTL f�j AU_ ^3ca i i°, qua ua o L nu O C F•O EL L np n N d �• rT 6U rY Ka• � u2 4 ° V Y« Eo Vc nE G L C.nU N "aT C NODS ."-. •� �..C. n. 6 M �y 4- �....+L t � � a v 0 � U O = � 4 ` � O T T 4 �l C'. -/3 n ' � �v x �i 6 p tp V •� L L V M y ° n Ww E O.C9 G V V OL VLL. d W g 2 0 CViF LC Vn«O�LC.y L Pa W A V° Y 7 CB MO _ �L'ai4Ly' n^^O «d L nu O C F•O EL L np N d �• rT 6U rY C.nU N "aT C NODS w.Ti �" •� �..C. n. 6 M �y 4- �....+L YZZ_ C'. -/3 \ � � - -� _ � 3 ..• � . . {); \ g & > / \ 4 � - ) §� � � ■ � : _ ' � j - : _ _\ ti : � . . ��. . .. \. . ^ ^� �� \� RESOLUTION NO. A PESOi.UTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING A TIME FATENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 100$F. WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a_ time -extension for the above- descri.hed project pursuant to section 17.02.A9O and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved ) a above described Tentative Tract. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following i" findings: A. The previously approved Tentative Map is. in sub! tantlal compliance pith the City's current. General Pl<n, Specific Mans, Ordinances, Plans, Codes and Policies; and, a. The extension of the Tentative Map will not c +,,Use significant inconsistencies with the currant General Plan, Specific Plans, Ordinances Plans, Codes and Policies; and., C. The extension of the Tentative Map is not likely to cause public health and safety problems; and, 0. The extension is within the time limits prescribed by state law and local oreinan,;e. SECTION 0: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grans a ime extension for: Tract P.ppl i cant Expiration 10088 Friedman Homes 10/13/87 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, airman ATTEST• •bra u erx ep"7jTy—" acre ary e P4ANN'IR &,C439tdT5SI0N RESOLUTION August 13, 1886 Tentative Tract 1008$ Page rri T, Bt's¢ Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commiss .pn " of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced., passed, and adopted by the Planning commission of the City of Rancho Cucar( ,,hga, at a ragular meeting of the Planning Coamission helj on the 13th day of August, 1486, by the followin3 Mote- to -w•it: AYES: MWISSIOREAS: t� NOES: COMISSIOREAS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: F; 1 I I j I i _y CT11Y OF RANCHO CuctumoNGA ',.STAFF REPORT DATE: August 13, 1986 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Cornaission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, hsiociate Planner a i r O O F_ S Z U _ 57 1977 1 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PFRMII 84 -09 - :1MENOMENT - CHURCH OF UI a re"gWS :a amen a approve .,m 1 Iona se ermit allowing the installation of four 35 -fGot high and two 50 -foot high light fixtures for tale northerly softball and soccer fields, located at 582E Etiwanda Avenue, north of Victoria Street - APN 227 -06-65 and 23. (Continued from July;; 1986) ?. ABSTRACT: The purpose of this report is for the Planning ommmission to review and consider appraral of the nighttime use of the recreation fields. II. P,ICKGROUND: The Planning Commission, at its regular June 25, 1986 meek ng,: conducted a public hearing and diracted the applicant to; `1) submit a noise stuo�j '?d, (2) a light and glare study for their review at the Jul,; 2' ' 1986 regular The Planning Commission had reviewed the proposal and was concerned with the noise, light and glare environmental impacts to the surrounding roperties. Residents of the surrounding properties r?isca,, concerns over the cl anul ati ve i.np.act of noise, and traffic because of Little League programs a" Etiwanda Ounior High Scnaol, located south of the church property (south of Victoria Avenue). The purpose of these two studiets are to further analyze the- environmental impacts and ta provide further mitigation measurer. to all vl ate the impacts. At the request of tits applicant, the Flay 'ng Commission continued this item from 'the July 23rd meeting .slow the applicant's time to complete the studies, On July 26, 19u;4. the applicant sutiuittad both studies and the noise study for staff review. III,. ='..NALYSIS: A. Environmental Impacts• Several potential envirompentai impacts Were as a result of this proposed 4 nighttime use the rs;reation fiends. The o *ollowing analysis is based on tale Noise Study and the Light and Glare study as sobmitted by the applicant. IT E14 D e 9 REIM PLANNING E:OMMIS ON��r FF REPORT � CONDITI0NAL USE PERMIT w4-9.9 t August 13, 1986 Page 2 h a I. Noise: Some surrounding, residents raised concerns over e c`ennulative impacts of 'noise generated by the church's sports program and the Etiwanda Jun or Nigh School Little i k° League. Although the applicant did not indicate if they i have a P.A. systCA, the school's Little League does. Staff has received a letter from surrounding residents with a: petition requesting that no audio system be allowed ' for any sports program. A letter from the superintendent cf Etiwanda School District indicated that he is aware of the problem now and is working with the Little Leagee to resolve the noise problem, e A Noise Study has, been submitted by the applicant to r provide information regarding the amount of increase in noise levels during. the sports season. The study identifies and establishes the noise level based on different voice efforts as shown in Table I of Exhibit "I". For example, at normal range of noise level with 3 feet distance between talker and listener, the noise revel is 60 dBA. It includes information. .on how the noise level dissipates with distance between O lkor ad listener, as shown in Table It of Exhibit "I". x<:•ing the course of a game (either at playoff games os° regular games), the majority of the time, the not ^�i,, 'levels are at normal conditions (57 dBA). During a ' *IV, r10, or an exciting play, voice levels can rise to ')vary loud" (74 dBA). Periodically, fans wild shout encouragement to team players or the umpire. In other worU, the consultant is stating that the sound level generated-by sports programs are not identical and varies from one game or inning to anoth,r. In an effort to identify the noise levels generated by the sports program, ti?e consultant created a theoritical scenario of 50 spectators with two 9 person teams. The spectators will be split into two groups ind will be clustering around first base and third base nines. The spectators and the team at bat will be the sole source of noise levels. The study states that a "Normal Voice Level of Participants" is a case study of noise levels under normal conversations, with no hit or run, while a "Very Loud Voice Level of Participants' is a case study where there is a hit, or a run, or an exciting play, These two scenarios are created in an attempt to measure and calculate the different noise levels ,generated at the five locations along the north and east property boundaries, as shown in Exhibit "H". The following table shows the noise MCA levels generated by the two case scenarios, based on collected data of similar games: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CON0ITIONAL USE `PE ?MIT 84 -09 August 13, 1986 PL,;e 3 W ABLE I VOICE LEVELS ,, (t10 lift or run) (Very excitbd P','iy) POSITION NORMAL VERY LOUD —54— _ #2 38 55 #3 34 51 #4 31 48 #5 33 50 The calculated measurement of noise levels from this table shows that even an exciting play, that is with a run or a hit, the noise levels at the different locations along the northern property boundaries do not exceed 60 dBA, except for location #1,_ -.,,hich is third base. The s udy also stated that they nave not taken into consideration the 6- ti foot black wall along the north and east property boundar ns . This 6 -foot block wall will produce a minimum of 5 dBA noise reduction. To mitigate the noise level on third base, the study recommended that the existing 6-foot block wa?? be rcised to 8 feet high, and place the sound blanket bMind the spectator bench on the third base side. With the mitigation measures, the north side of the wall, the resider;ce side, should have noise levels below 60 dBA. However, the study did not indicate if the acceptable noise level at evening time-is lower than-the level acceptable during daytime, ;which is 60 dBA. A difference of an incv;sse of 5 dBA'daring evening time may be perceived higher than an increase in daytime. The_ City's General Plan also did not indicate the minimal range.at whic`:sleep disturbance would occur. Mitigation Measures: A. The block wall along the northern property boundary could be extended to 8 feet high. B. Place a sound blanket behind the third base line. C. Restrict the use of the lighted softball field only during the softball and soccer seasons, such as the month of April to July and from September to November, respectively. D. Do not allow evening playoff games. E. Limit the ending time to 9:00 p.m. �- 3 PLANNING COMMI'SSIOt�ST FF REPORT CONDIT11HAL USE PERMIT 8449 August 3, 1986 Page 4 a 4TT� F. No ).A. systems allowed. G. Extend the existing block wall to 8 feet. 2. 3. H. Contact the Etiwanda School District to inform theft of the problem and negotiate to have all P.A. systems eliminated: Light and Glare Environmental Impacts: The electr °gal engimeer consultant rom Ithe - developer has submitted a supplemental light and glare study to address the light and glare impacts. The study shows-that by using all 50- foot nigh poles for the six poles (the oraiginal property was four 35 foot high poles and two 50.feet high poles), the amount of spill over could be reduced, as shown in Exhibit "G ". The amount of footcandles spilled over onto the adjacent properties shown is significantly less than 1 foot candle. Current Development Code has a maximum standard of 5 foot candle. Mitigation Measures: Addit,ahal mitigation could be provided by limiting the ending time for all sports programs on Thursday night and Saturday night to 9:00 p.m. consistent with sports program conducted by the City�s Community Services Depar"inetet. This would reduce the number of hours the surrounding residents could be impacted by the lighted fields. Cumulative Impact of Traffic: The surrounding residents at the last public nearing raised concerns regarding the cumulative impact of traffic. The reason being that the Little League uses the play field at the intermediate school across the street in the evening. The sports programs proposed by the church on Thursday and Saturdey nights may coincide with some of the sports program from the junior high school, resulting in increased vehicular traffic and noise. Staff Comment: Staff has contacted the Superintendent of iwan a c-Hool Cistrict, who stated that the Little League program is from February to July and is held on Monday through Thursday evenings. The church's sports program is from April to July for softball games and from Sepl:ember to November for soccer games. Therefore, there is a four months period where the church's softball games on Thursday evenings would coincide O th the school Little League program. PLANNIW COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ' GONOITIONAL USE,PERMIT 84709 August 13, 198 6 Page 5 i S The two main accesses from the church are on Etiwanda. Avenue with an emergency access located on Victoria Avenue. Since the church has a large parking facility, there will not be any impact on off -site parking along the public streets. However, the evening sports programs r• proposed on Thursday and Saturdays would generate an 'Increase of nighttime traffic along Etiwanda Avenue. Vehicular ` tj- Iaffic on Victoria Avenue may not be increased as the parficipants of the church's sports program would enter the site from Etiwanda Avenue. However, the applicant has not proposed mitigation measures to "deal with the cumulative traffic impacts for the proposed evening sports program on Thursdays and Saturdays, Mitigation Measures: T- insure that the nighttime use of tfie recreation ie ds would have negligable cumulative impact;; un traffic, the Planning Commission could impose the fd lowing mitigation measures: A. Limit the sports aerogram to only oij Friday nights and SaturOrr from the months of April to July, and from i the months of September to Novei;ber. This would assure no conflict of the church's .sports program and Little League programs, B. No evening playoff games allowed during the month of July at all. This would limit the increase of vehicular traffic since regular games have less spectators. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In consideri -1 the proposed amendment to the Conditional se P ermit, the Planning Commission must make the following findings: A. That the proposed installation of the six light poles of 50 feet high is an accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the purpose of the District in which the site is located. B. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto and the added mitigation measures, will not be detrimental 1,, the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, C. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Etiwanda Specific Plan.d PLANNING CON tS 0 57AFF RE OR`i CONOITIONAL.USE PERMIT 8409 August 13, 19Cs Page b V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised again in The Daily Report newspaper, the proporty posted and notices were se6t to tfie property owners Within 300 feet of the project site. x VI. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recoimends� th t the planni;n -cr ' Commission consi der ai I input and public testimony regarding this project: If the Planning Commission can° suipport the Facts for Findings and Resolution of Approval with the mitigation measures, then approval of this amenament to the Conditional Use Permit world be in order. If the Planning Commission cannot suppr.*1 the Facts for Findings, then direct ect staff to prepare a Resolution of DErt ai for your review at the following regular Plannl,q Commission meeting as a consent calendar item'. 4Braull�e/r ully f City Planner BB: V: j r l }` Attachments: Letter From Etiwanda.Schooi District r Letter & Petition From Surrounding Residents Regarding Audip System Planning Commission Report of June 23, 1986 Exhibit "A" Location Map Exhibit "B" - Approved Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Detailed Ball Field Plan Exhibit "D" - Typical Beam Spread Exhibit-"E" - Light Beam Spread for the Two Fields Exhibit "F" - Area of Light Spill Over With two 35 - Foot & four 50 Feet Exhibit "G" - Area of Light Spill Over With six 50 feet High Light rixtures Exhibit "H" - Location of Noise Level Measurement Exhibit "I" - Tables I & II of Noise Level WWI h n� P.Q. Box 248, Etiwanda, California 91739 ' (714) 899 -2451 J 0y`Ri *- August 5, 1986 OF'RANCHOY�n t'LANNIi r, Dt^UCAMOJV,34 AUG 06 1986 PJ 7�81�It}�111t11i3�i5P6 City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Sir: It has been brought to my attention that the audio system being used at the Little League field located at the Etiwanda Intermediate School is creating a noise disturbance in the community. The audio equipment being utilized for announcing games belcsa.1s to Little League and is nct the pro- perty of the Etiwanda School Distr;.et. Therefore, the District does not have aiv real authority over the_use of the audio equipment except, of course, ordering its removal. ,,however, at the Board's direction, I have talked with representatives of Little League and expressed concerns to them as I became aware of them. In the future I plan to contact thewa representatives again in terms of lowering the volume while broadcasting games. The Disstrict will do" whatever can be done to eacourage the Little League to use restraint in the use of the audio equipment, or else we shall be forced to take more drastic action. For instance, the removal of all audio equipment, if necessary. Sincerely, 4 aul_ � Carleton P. Lightfo Superintendent CPL:rg Carleton R Lightfoot Superintendent Board of Trustees R. G. (Jerry;, _t edlau Gary R. Collins " David W. Long r Marshall B. PruRt (.� Cecilia Solofio a 1t111R1016181Z Ladies and Gentlemen of the Planning Commission and City CgnOC}1,:9nb �V My name is Beth Davidson and my husband and I live at 13018 Larrera Avenue, Etiwanda. (the house is still listec�st �'3 ��l�P1Nvftme of Lewis) . 1 am addressing the Planning Commission an � Q.i j� concerning the propoL-,,d athletic fields and the use IrINA an onside public address system thereon. When I was first approached to sign Dave Long's petition regarding the athletic fields and lighting I was informed that there would be no public address system - used at the athletic functions and that we would not be affected by the overflow from the lighting system (I therefore signed the petition which I am requesting that my signature be removed due to information later r v' p o ided to me by Dave Long) . The second time I spoke with Dave Long regarding the athletic fields I was informed that the only time a public address system would be used would be in the month of duly for the play -off games. N r ��nnarn i n }hi c tna }tar i s thr� n rhl it arld ..+is Z,V_ As you are aware, we already have a public address system at the ball field located on Victoria Avenue which is a great n•ii- spnce, to say the least. I am not 0000sed in nnv 4•aV +^ +ham ••F a ,a„�y;iyfce e continue use of the public address system _s „the a_tt,�ndanc�y ot�e at a cic programs ;brow. There is rio, guarantee that the games Amok sc e u e 7�r the Vic oria ield and the LDS fields will not, at some point in time, overlap. If this happens, we #ill not only have the public address system going for the game /games on Victoria Avenue we will have the public address system going for the games at the church and we will be caught in the middle of the public address system battle. According to Dave Long's own testimony, the LDS church is having great difficulty in arranging athletic field space to con- duct their athletic programs in this area. Now that this LDS chap- ter (and I am not sure whether it is a ward or a stake) is being built locally and the members do not have to travel as far to at£end their functions, the congregation wiil grow and, therefore, so will the attendance at these athletic events. Therefore, I am concerned that the original plan of no public address system which has now emerged into play -offs in the month of July will eventually turn into the battle of the public address systems between the Victoria games and the LDS church games. I therefore propose that in granting the use of these facil- ities for athletic events the Planning Commission and City Council stipulate that there will be no public address systems for outside athletic vents whatsoever used on these premises. Many of my neighbors are unaware that there will now be a public address system used for the athletic play -off games in the Ir; k Page $4 f Planning Commission %citl Cnnnnil Re: LDS Church Public address System at Athletic Functions month of duly. I au hereby submitting a list of concerned neighbors who have the same feelings regarding the use of the public address system for outside atl.letio events who were unable to attend this meeting. 'hank you for your time and consideration in this matter. Sincerely, Beth Davidson olTY lvED "LA F RANCHO ClCAl"91MA NNING DIV i�jot l AUG 0 7 1980 71s191 lot "IRJ11.2131$lSpfi A L/ — q We, the neighbors in the immediate arep of the ;ADS church and oroposed athletic fields, hereby ��nEQ L Q' — _Serest that the C tv Council stipulate that there wi' iq?I �iNi r0 , I "nG;�atsoeyer of art o,,+s,df_ public address system on the church premises for athletic or other events. AUG G 7 1980 NAME ADDRESS AIA PM PHONE (� ,y n �'s839�ll1.s11�12�1r2y3s4�5�f: p.q 1..3 , 'Z M nu_^�- �_�Ofai P -/0 [1 r r L cD_ /L f �L! -13 AF? �% j Le1cr rT c yv ` l '��r'�- � ✓2PGZ�.� -- j �C`i �G� �fir� -rI7t. ��'-! iUr� ��., �'�'t �-/ �� v � I C(YY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AI.ANNINO D1YIWON r Pty 4?_1 / We, the neighbors in the immediate area of the ;,„D5 church, and propose.; athletic ,fields, hereby respectfully reauest� that th(_ r - planning Commission and ci,y Council stipulate that then; will be no use of an outside Dublic •address system ,hatsoe-aer, ' I f NAME ADDRESS P:ONF 717 3 a ell 1.4 G rl i5le LTi� [1 r r L cD_ /L f �L! -13 AF? �% j Le1cr rT c yv ` l '��r'�- � ✓2PGZ�.� -- j �C`i �G� �fir� -rI7t. ��'-! iUr� ��., �'�'t �-/ �� v � I C(YY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AI.ANNINO D1YIWON r Pty 4?_1 / CITY Or RANCHO CtiCAMONGA STAFF REPORT' DATE: June 25, 1986 TO: Chairman and Members Gf the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Associate. Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -09 AMENDMENT - CHURCH OF LATTER DAY SAINTS - The request to amend the approved Conc►itional Use Permit allowing the installation of four 35 -foot high and two 50 -foot high light fixtures for the northerly softball and soccer fields, located at 6829 Etiwanda Avenue, north of Victoria Street - APN: 227 -06 -65 and 23. I. ABSTRACT: The applicant is proposing to extend the use of the previously approved recreation fields into night time with the installation of 6 light poles /fixtures to light up the northerly softball and Soccer fields. The purpose of this report is for the Planning Commission to review and consider such extension of use; to determine whether the Facts for Findings, can be made for supporting the approval of night time use of the recreation fields, and if so, to determine the mitigation measures needed for redtL'FX- the envirGnmental impact. II. BACKGROUND: On August 22, 1984, the Planning Commission conditionally approved CUP 84 -09 for a church.. facility, two recreational fields and a storage facility as shown in Exhibit "B". Curm ntly, the church and storage facility are under construction while the two recreational fields (two softball fields and 1 soccer field) are being graded. One of the Conditions of Approval require that any improvements within the recreational fields such as installation of lights require a separate review and approval from the Planning Commission. The applicant proposes installation o'- ;our 35 -foot high and two 50 -foot high light standards. III. ANALYSTS: A. General: The proposed six light fixtures for the northerly softball and soccer fields are at the locations shown on Exhibit "C" The southerly softball field will not be lighted. The recreational fields will be used for church programs only, and will not be leased or rented out to any outside organization or the general public. The softball field will be lighted (all six lights) two times a week on Thursday ITEM D D PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 84 -09 Anendment - Church of Latter Dey Saints June 25, 1986 page 2 and Friday night games during the softball season, which is from April through July. The soccer field will be lighted on Thursday night only (three lights) during the season from September to November. Since the softball season and soccer season are at different months of the year, only one sport program will occur at a time. No sports program will take place on Sunday. The developer has contacted the adjacent property owners and informed them of their proposal to irstall these light fixtures. Attached for your review are signatures from adjacent property owners that have no objections to the lights being used on the field under the above conditions and a map showing where they are located. The site for thq recreational field (two softball fields and one soccer field) is surrounded on the north side, east side, and the south side ay single- family residaices. However, six- foot to eight -foot 'high perimeter block wall, as well as new Eucalyptus windrows (5 gallon size at 8-feet on center) are being provided on the north side, east side, and the south side property boundaries. The applicant has also switched the location of the number 1 softball field diamond from the northeast corner to the northwest corner, the number 2 softball field diamond from the southeast corner tc the southwest corner. The switcif in location of the softball diamonds allow 3 of the light poles to be located in the interior of the site, thus minimizing the impact to adjacent property owners. With regard to the Number 1 softball field, three light poles are located at the west side of softball field whe -e poles 3 and 4 are 35 -feet high and pole 5 is 50- feet high.. Poles 1 and 2 are both 35 feet high' and are setback five -feet fry^ the north property boundary. Pole 6 is located at the eas' side and setback 15 -feet from the property boundary- and is 56 feet high. According to the applicant, all light patterns have been engineered to light the ball field with less than 1 foot candle spill over onto any adjacent property. Exhibit "E" shows the beam spread of all the light poles a,.d Exhibit "F" shows the spill over impacted area of adjacent properties. B. Height Limitation`s: According to the Etiwanda Specific Plan Development Standard, the building height limitation within the residential district is 35 -feet. However, the development standard has no provisions regarding the height for light poles for any recreation fields. C. Environmental Impacts: The installation of these six light so poles, ranging from a height of 35 -feet to 50 -feet, may have the following environmental impact to the surrounding properties: PLANNING 'COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 84 -09 Amendment - Church of Latter Day Saints June 25, 1986 Page 3 1. Liolit and Glare: The lighted fields at two nights a weiek L -Aween the months of April and November (except Augusta could create light and glare that have potential adverse impacts on surrounding residences especially to the east and the north side. Current Development Code policy states that all lights shall be designed to project 'light downward a0 shall not create - illumination which exceed 5 foot candles on adjacent propertie According to the applicant, the proposed lights that they will be install;ng have protective lamp shields that restrict the spread of the light beam. The amount of spill over when they are lit up is less than 1 foot candle. Exhibit "F" shows thu spill over area into the adjacent properties. Staff has contacted the Community Services Department for additional information regarding height of light poles for softball field. The community Services Department stated that the t0 ler the light pole, the less glare for adjacent properties since the face of the lights would be pointing downward to light up the desired area. The shorter the light pole, the more glare for adjacent properties as the face of the lights would have to be tilted at an angle for lighting up the desired area. The height of the light poles will be using in City's Community Park are up to 80 -feet high. However, these poles would not be placed adjacent to any resider,;:es since the size of a Community Park could range from 20 acres to 100 acres. The Community Services Department recommended that a report prepared by a licensed electrical engineer be required from -the applicant to determine and certify the amount of spill over for compliance with the City Code of 5 foot candles maximum. 2. Noise: According to the applicant, any sport on Thursday and Friday nights will end at 10:00 p.m. Also, approximately 10 to 15 spectators may be present at those 2 night games. At play -off games, there may be as many as 75 spectators to watch the games during the month of July. Information regarding the amount of increase in noise level during the play -off games has not been provided by the applicant. The normally acceptabl^ outdoor noise level is 60 decibles, according tr� the .sty's General Plan. It takes an increase & 5 decibles for any noticabie change in sound, while an increase in 10 decibles would mean doubling loudness and will have adverse impacts. Therefore, the number of spectators at play -off games could generate an unacceptable P f�/ • r' PLANNING COMMISSI "ON STAFF REPORT CQP 84 -09 Amendment - Church of Latter Day Saints June 25, 1985 Page 4 noise level that might impact the surrounding residents. Some of the impacts could be annoyance, nuisance, dissatisfaction, and interference with speech and sleep. 3. Aesthetics: The location of the church facility partially shields some of the light poles from public view from Etiwand.a Avenue. These six poles are very visible from the single - family residences on the north and east side. However, existing along the west property boundary of the � tst side residences are five 50 -foot high Edison poles as shown in Exhibit "C ". 4. Compatibility to Residential Aran: The height of the sir light poles ranging from 35-feet to 50 -feat high may not be compatible to residential development. 0. Mitigation Measures: In reviewing this Conditional Use Permit Ameidment to allow the installation of light poles, the Planning Commission could consider the following mitigation r measurers to reduce or eliminate any environmental impacts to the surrounding residents: :. Reduce the hei ht of all the light-Roles. This would provide compatabi ,ty to the surrounding residential building height. However, shorter light poles may increase the amount of glare to surrounding properties. 2. Reduce the number of sports programs )laved at at night per �week as well as the eridin time. This would rrree2uce t e times and the uration of any environmental impact to the surrounding properties. 3. Restrict the use of the lighted soft5all field only durin the softbail and soccer seasons such as from the moat es pr1 to u y, and rom September `o November, rpectiv^ly. This would reduce the number of times those sports programs could affect the surrounding propertie.t 4. Require a report prepared by a licensed electrical engineer to certify the amount of spill over is less than 1 foot candle. S. Limit the number of spectators allowed during sport programs. This would reduce the potential of unacceptable noise levels. However, this Mould be difficult to monitor and control. P _/__ 5 -, PLANNINB40' fSSIOwSTAFF REPORT CuP,84 -09 Amendment - Church of Latter/Day Saints " June 25, 1986 Page 5 , IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS. In considering the proposed amendment to the Conditional use ermit, the Planning Commission must make the followint,fndings: A. That the proposed installation of the fixed light poles ranging from a height of 35 to 50 -feet is in accord with thri General Plan, the objectives of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and the purpose of the district in which the site is located. B. That the proposeu use, together with the conditions applicable -' thereto, will riot be detrimental to public health, safety, welfare, or materi-�l,ly injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity. C. That the _proposed use complies frith each of the applaaable �ovisions of the Etiwanda SpecifiV Plan. r: V. CORRESPONuENCE: This item has be;:ar advertised in The Daily Report F newspaper, property posted, and notices were sent to the property owners within 300 feel; 'L. of the project site. VI. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission consider alt input and public testi% .y renar..ding this project and determine whether the Facts for Findings tall be made to support approval of '.he amendment to the Conditional Q! a Permit or make determination as bu he mitigation measures needed for reducing the environmental ir•.pact. If the Planning Commission can support toe Facts for Findings, staff should be directed_ to drepare a Resolution of Approval with Conditions for your review at the followins regular Planning Commission meeting. If the Planning Commission cannot support the Facts for Find'ngs, then staff should be directed to draft a Resolution of Denial for adoption at the next meeting. Rully su ed, Bler City Planner BB:NF:cv -9 E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT i. C4P 84,09 Amendment - Church of Latter nay Sairits June 25, 1986 Page 6 Attachment;. o Applicant's Letter of Proposal o Map Shotr'nq Surrounding Residents who are "For" or "Against" the Project o Signatures of Surrounding Residents with'no Objection to the Installation of the Light-Poles. Exhibit "All - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Approved 9etai7ed Site Plan Exhibit "G" - C,,tailed Ballfieid Plan,, a` Exhibit 1'O" - Typical Beam Spread Exhibit "E" - Light Beam Spread for the Two Fields E.xhibi L- 'IF,' - area z1- Light Spill Over 'xhibit 110 - North Perspective View 4„ Exhibit "ti",- Photos of Proposed Lights Design, i I -1 il- tr Routs 30 ED m Not_.TH cn,y or, I T M 1: RANCHO CUCI,4�j�vjo.NL GA TITLE- PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT. S CALE. 6 ,;_z_s6 r �I 71 r MR H CITY OF RANCHO CcTCAMOiNGA PLANNING DRMaN EXlilBrr.- SCALE, i. ... x4 _ ._ � stt. .` awt '" � � N'► S �r _' i J I d4 . > w >.a �•. a+V Lr2YDabrY ; _. I IlPN O/1. ` wime � 1 LL ��� , ?SaG (• hall f—:.. ' sorrx�:..wrul: risx+cm�u+yr_� { t 1 1 J ' !. 1 z 21 016 H I I It ZE f5"ft- e 7Z 19,1.10 '19I`TL ^_lsfl2 t -x NURTH . CITY OF RANCHO ULKAMONGA I'I- ANNII\G DIVISION EXIIIBtI=-- -:ALE: i � /� ORMgJ014 111E ann c m� �¢ID (`„ r from laot° oct°vt nP p t e let di°i1S bnah7e catalog fy eC i be ganarn base w WIa1o0 ro eed ollTU°. C) a� am NP par W!' �pleocdnnrW :.as.1 i 117 si� /v number +F1 �£t7-OI G 4ts5 C£aYOiEW `vraloa` �1" r •�. 1 1t �•�... %.�.w � OA'GA 1 WaltivU ,I 30-0 GA 400 MMa1Ha11de'_ 45 - 1 'XSdsM SA�riP 1 watlM8ral V4RW0 ,n •t 5D3M1.0A'G♦ 1 00wan Meta \Halide 4 % 40A'G• Sobd ll ire -GP jab I�y�gpt, potted' Insect siny}edia'd�a, desoesr° °ICY 5 °egva laCddYl mble •IrdK'tt pEMAbes tyPg, lnsen sn9le 9 ,Indwa l:A�fl dlaatari15 that follow �J 1 ISOF het9hloltich' n9e d on ilia mounl ramS.oes no uired en510nS 10t lhP. iSolootcandle 1S te4 Th • a 12are andle rain e dim base J7aa ages36- 3 otoohls so only one ilia s also based on a. Onhl The sh Pe Gi the ishei9 oint I &) ilhl d The mounting aiming p i.goom%.She 21. theilood119htisaln he m ach aim for O het ' point Mh s away from atie 80leet tar a % the mo' eln9 to (A'1mi n hei9 1n the .e 01 t nounun9 t this diagrams two bt o ytOUld or E of two Iloodligh rdie each iioodtig o a rhstancdlrectly belo�e9ht Isolootcaallown lot eah: tile toot, ground Untin9 chow _ e letter N a g0goot m aim Points are Each isotootca; pas to 8 danhfied b �e values n three d, 3133, 2• These rL ft,e tootcand This a e, 3. me 'Tiles than2.1- onP 1etevellsthhthetoolcandleot range more hoes. cand is used IV,. level between Thegrid which . olootcam'Ae lines date the Inountingheighside of the Arm& osstble Kr approximdonthe with between tp edher in line make5 it Poss tern'salsobas�e the distance distance They tellantlrt9ht the side show the berS.Sorinstenj t. values aluesuP t Thenum die d a9i9 line t The v . iloodhgh • Quoting Iloodli9h - dire 'lion 200 lrom be isoiootc�n draw 9S• d0 0. 200 ieel > the atnitn9 installat � ns the the working w [ePresents 5 j,g,,ting aCpl¢ Sas Ili andta diagram 5hO For co wit to the same entbeams C be redri on thesar Theed9eoiadlac lighting• The da�ty'diines be Dr er to uniform the Prac ic'aedgeoitb lnes in have shoutr5 o`,er.aP S 0 pGiG AUU@ ace isoi dle 131" to 'The lotlowin9 table dives lhe ountng rte 9hLTnThas makes at spe�on each set of curventerpela•e be loolcandle curve ilia same rams directly and each ielter are dia9 distances it PP'teible to compare tweed cury es lot dJierent aiming LU 1 G HEIGHT "Out TiPi 50 80 40 01 Q,08 0.16 0.2 0.1i S 0.31 0.5 ().69 C 0.68 1.0 1 4 U 3.1 2.0 3.5 5:0 F 7.3 5 10 0 15.0 10.4 ri '3 4 '- AN OL6gALUr-S SAMp1.ti: ISOPOOTC 1 -t X • �• CHECK se 1pEMA) eavY•duNat general PUtPO - CenSlflwl4a,p5tV��r�ar4 �Oin caste s � rasset°bry ���° red doP�Ow�ldtered ac cuss �Seate�dd or for °uwktamv �,� �Hmg .rte NDL'01 AGRAM SAi`nPLEiSOFOOTt%A ' edge at ) Beam FL�i\ ILMLIM111 _ M :r RECTION 1-lE1GHT FOR resentative N►OU1` '4uA r 1e are rep it ht. ; his given In the tab dh then todmula: The mourdin9 be Pattern associated lollowrng i, heig tsusethe lortheviattag ounttn9 a overt to ott:ef �'; a h (10) tNIH ) To co (tc) ov) n t`lew From chart at 50 tt. tlsoto he Whte 5 lootcandle level 511,mounlin9 1 e. a a value of 4.13 at 5 for r)wOuldhave to = AA curve F)wou t5) t50Z) o (tG) t55') vraLU� UM iS�F�9tUA�ULE MAXIN► iv et aximumtttuml die traduce at a part vaWeshou aiming erm051 isofoolca� ill P it th , ht level. rhecen: 11ood119htFor9GOdunvlorag�intttallis ear the nation value untn9hei9bt• the a of sPOts n ijj,.s in Ppintbanmore tban three times not are Possi M teveis elsewhere. 19 he� vat and lower lig Iloodhghts . � � s � a r� N �. � � �. ry �� � �f m � � �, :. „ � a � �: r. � � � � e ,x �( v � �i � � � � iJ� i � � � Z y � � +� .� �. � .� � -- — •----- �- ---�.. ... E � ►� R�,, �, � � � � �a � , �� lq, nn1`))' ` \� � �:� � iGS%� ate. ( 'V' ._ Grp � �� �� V � `} Q �� �l i �� ��� r y„) 1°"s �� �� , ..__. �...... _I .G� � b (ice - I I I I u I I I I I U I I I I ICJ 1 A�rst- e'fm.n•evaw . 3�GLPAP.c�.�J�' aarm 111li5Yll LINry .lFMJf$Il' S.L..W�tf CeIWO.IY.WL MIlY90 /Y/yA!fldL Ad4M' _ i— %x ecx- zesnnvaies_ _ _�trg- racawnlvevsere o�_ }_ - - 0.16 Footcandle spillover • -- 0.16 Footcandle = .00533% _ or 40% of .e-mimimum street li.gh: I i . >ti.F von I -(--- -. L j i e.wi?. rrcwr dI 1 -0-32 Footcandle spillover I r -- 0.32 Footcandle = .01666% g Ir --}I IF or 80% of a mimimum street li r- I �—L I� 0.64 Footcandle spillover I� II I 11 -0-.64 Footcandle = ':02133% ' 14C35 /flhft fAnW -:5, NORTH --er 1.5 of a mimimum street ligrc C 50 CITY OF ITEM RANCHO CU AMMONGA TITLE: PLANNING DIVIR aN EXHIBIT: rcOT fl4 pmL 2 .G� � b (ice - I I I I u I I I I I U I I I I ICJ 1 A�rst- e'fm.n•evaw . 3�GLPAP.c�.�J�' aarm 111li5Yll LINry .lFMJf$Il' S.L..W�tf CeIWO.IY.WL MIlY90 /Y/yA!fldL Ad4M' _ i— %x ecx- zesnnvaies_ _ _�trg- racawnlvevsere o�_ }_ - - 0.16 Footcandle spillover • -- 0.16 Footcandle = .00533% _ or 40% of .e-mimimum street li.gh: I i . >ti.F von I -(--- -. L j i e.wi?. rrcwr dI 1 -0-32 Footcandle spillover I r -- 0.32 Footcandle = .01666% g Ir --}I IF or 80% of a mimimum street li r- I �—L I� 0.64 Footcandle spillover I� II I 11 -0-.64 Footcandle = ':02133% ' 14C35 /flhft fAnW -:5, NORTH --er 1.5 of a mimimum street ligrc C 50 CITY OF ITEM RANCHO CU AMMONGA TITLE: PLANNING DIVIR aN EXHIBIT: ra o s JMI r or 1J'� /GL CulC 1 35 APOT RIC71f • .W +w'TiCCGai •.•��.. 2tsrccvy LSr. P �ft� I I I I n I I 1 1 I n i 1 1 1 11: \ r crQ tJt?a1 j Gl6/fi` ��S A� IS417I 30.0 FO CARI LEE � I dHM'IJ LUIS G(� ' •fix lsces Exsr..et�.+e•rrav 7CEZ2?Af.� -/G�' ,a-.w,r. I• -i-- -• —^--r .. L,.._. LIGHT PATERNS AND s',pILLOVER FOR rrrd7a� as 6 50' HIGH LIGHT POLES 0.10 Footcandle spillover 0,10 Footcandle = .0047% w «nrs rrseanutya ozeEeix ;. — �1.iZA�• .x�.rt[.�v�s. I �lOdr OP 25% 25% of a min, street light rnn- uvei�i'_ t I e 0.20 Footcandle spillover 0.20 Footcandle = .0094% OR 55% of a min, street light 0.30 Footcandle spillover f 0.30 FoOtcandles = .0189 % OR 80% cE a mon, street light Note: } w A ;•5�.42tgg�dle spi ver � WITH ALL 50' HIGH POLES OVER 0.40 Footca 3'6 ALL FOOTCANDLE WA., REDUCED OR 1.10% of a min, street light 5 FOOTCANDLE. NE•+°TH CITY OF ITEV1 =, RANCHO CUCAMONGA P AN1VIj\'C1 IVLSi(:) : EXHII31T:., SCALE= < -Z.- 0 04C iYw �j f'aLE 3z0. GO' Ff f tLi 30 {�OTOANDLES. a ON 1N.6FIdLU3 \ . .G !1 �=�& 4 its ca s "'fir o 1A � •�`� i w •; t4 - ;3c,�;tr't�'�irro .u.,rr�- �ixa.�,�:•cr+xy j, i • 'aarzs s zr � 4 �r, as'Nf/ �r yy • Y.i'r ^^ p�fl ltu61 ,f°.F- TX6S&YI' x.13 .4vo�Wr�l�.. . ; � C'aUttaRVRU. IJ�E ti-Ga !Wr'/'�H.ErA4 .F�clrG/' - � • � � A+h%G .TE�?Y•ltlir7tNAiF t :.!N.G/GG.Ge _' 30.0 Fe't'Y'GONA.�F,S. 7r 1 jf. 'GfiYilt?ll..- l..i•' f- %dOTGf.YOG�" •' d '' + yr 1y z I\rJRTH r CITY OF iTiabi: , RANCHO CUCAIMONGA Srii�i is �a� PUNNING DIViS QN EXHIBIT--41— SCALE s TABLE T Vocal Effort A- Weighted of Sound Level, DBA Maximum �•, Shout 82 DBA c Very Loud 74 DBA Raised 65 DBA Normal 57 DBA. Relaxed 50 DBA Whisper 40 DBA j J TABLE II 1 SHORT TERM SPEEC4 INTERFERENCE LEVELS IN dBA SPEECH INTEI,rERENCE LEVELS IN d?A FOR VARIOUS LEVELS OF VOICE ACTIVITY € DISTANCE BETWEEN NORMAL RAISED LOUD SHOUTING TALKER AND LISTENER VOICE --7- VOICE VOICE VOICE -83- X39- X35— 3' 67 73 79 85 6' 61 67 73 79 4 12' 55 61 67 73 NORTI-i CITY OF RATCHQ cLT GA T c mo r TITLE:1 PUNNING DIVL ON �� EXHIBIT: SCALE: � V77,11" A` R , RESOLUTION NO. Z 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING CO.t�IISSIO.N APPROVING AN AMENDMENT JO 60I40ITIONAL USE PERMIT N0, 84- 6 09 FOR NIGHTTIME USE OF'RECREATION FIELDS LOCATED AT 6824 ETIWANDA AVENUE IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT a. WHEREAS, onthe 91.1h day of Jane, 1986, a complete application was filed by Church of Latter Day Saints for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 25th day of June, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public nearing to consider the above - described project and w continued the it to July 23, 1996; and, WHEREAS, on the 23rd day of July, 1986, the 1ancho Cucamonga Planning Commission again, continued the public hearing to August 13, 1986; and, WHEREAS, on the 13th day of August, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described my project. follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as 1 SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed use, together with the condition applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. - SECTION 2: That this project with the added mitigation measures will not crea e a verse impacts on the environment, supplementing the Negative Declaration which was issued on August 'r4 1984. SECTION 3: That the amendment to Conditional Use Permit No. 84 -69 is approve sect to the following conditions: PLANNING"-' LANNING G O &@I ©N Conditional Use P i Page 2 PLANNING DIVISION: 1. Evening sports program shall be held between the months of April to duTy& and the months of September to November. 7 2. Evening sports program shall occur Only on Fridays app! Saturdays., 3. Evening, playoff games sbal'l not be allowed. ' q. PA system or other audi',o equipment systems shall not 'd allowed. 5. All evening game's on Fridays and Saturdays shall end at 9:00 p.mJ., 6. A report prepared by a licensed electrical engineer -te, certify the amount of spill over is less,than one (1)) foot candle shall be submitted for City Planner approval prior to release of occupancy of the church facility. 7. The existing 6 -foot block wall aionj. the northern property boundary along the fzmtage of the Erecreation fields shall be extended to 8 feet high, 8. A sound blanket behind: the spectator bench on the third base line of, ,the softball field shall be provided. 9 If the evening sports. = vrogra'4 impacts the surrounding properties, this Conditional Use 'Permit shall be brought :back for Planning Commission review and consideration of revocation of the evening sports program, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1986. PLANNIL,1. '°MMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis[. stout, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy SecreWy 1 PLANNINff COMMI- SSION4 7_ 1 OTION` Conditional Use Permit 84.-09 Page 3 ,.. 1, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of thyI,,City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify it,at the foregoing Resolution was 4uly ar: regularly introduced,:, passed, and adopted by the P1 anpl ng Conmi sai on 'of the F° City of Rancho Guescaonga, at a regular meeting of the P;t- Annirg CCMiss„ ,,pn held 1 on the 13th day of August, 1986, by the following vote -to -wit, AYES: COMMISSIONERS: { t NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: �6 DATE: TO: FROM: f BY: SUBJECT: 0 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIt NGA STAFF REPORT CLGIkS)p August 13, 1986 ts77 Cherman and Members of the Piannin, Commission I Brad Buller, City Planner J Dino Pub rino, Assistant Planner ENVIRsNMENTAL ASSESS1ENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85 -36 i'�tR=' - The establish-ment of a temporary office trailer as an ancillary use to an existi— warehouse facility on 6.4 acres of land within 'tha: General Industrial /Rail Served Distriqt (Subarea 10), located on the east side or Pittsburg Avehue, between Newport Drive and 7th Street - APN 229- 26 -46. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a Conditional Use Permit and issuance of a Negarive Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zonin : North - are Ouse, Generai n ustrial /Rail Served (Subarea 10). South - Warehouse, General Industrial /Rail Served (Subarea. 10). East - Warehouse, General Industrial /Rai: Served (Subarea 10). West Warehouse, General Industrial /Rail Served (Subarea C. General Plan Designations: r Project Site - enera n ustrial /Rail Served. North General Industrial /Rail Served. South - General Industrial /Rail Ser; :d. East - General Industrial /Rail Served. West - General Industrial /Rail Served. D. Site Characteristics: The project site is fully developed and con ains a I arge warehouse facility f or Target Stores. II. ANALYSIS: 4. General: This Conditional Use Permit application is the resalt of —Code Enforcement action, The trailer was moved on -site without the Conditional Use Permit as required by Development ITEM E PLANNING COMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 85 -36 - TARGET STORES August 13, 1986 Page- 2' L3 Code Section 17,04.070 -C10. The proposed trailer is used as office space and occupied by three (3) employees. The trailer has beer, parked across four (4) parking stalls due to the proximity to an electrical supply from a pump horse and out of the main traffic flow (see Exhibit "R'). Photos will be presented at the August 13, 1986 Planning Commission meeting. The applicant has stated that the trailer is needed du_ to increase in work volume. Target is currently in construction stages of a larger permanent facility in the City of Fontana and scheduled to move in by Febrsiary 1988, at which time the temporary office traile. would be rc-moved. U. Design Review Committee: the Design Review Committee reconmienaea the following- 1. Architecturally integrated skirt be added to the base of the trailer in order to screen the trailer supports. 2. Provide potted trees and exterior plants along the south trailer elevation. 3. Limit Conditional Use Permit to one year or Target's vacancy of the subject racility, whichever comes first. Staff has incorporated these recommendations as conditions of the attached Resolution of Approval. C. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee has reviewed a nroa ec an determined that with the recmren:+ed Conditions of Approval, the project is consistent with the apps i'�rbi e standards and ordinances. 0. Environmental Assessment: Upon review and completion of Part I and lsarT' e n za iudy, staff has found no significant adverse environmental impacts related to the project. IiI. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the Industrial Area pecz rc an an a Ge eral Plan. The project will not be d.4rimental to adjacent properties or cause significant environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed site, existing building designs and the proposed trailer tsgether with the recommended conditions, are in compliance. with the industrial Area Specific Plan and City Standard, — IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve on i iona1 Ose Permit 85 -36 through the adoption of the attached Resolution and Conditions of Approval and issue a Negative Declaration -- for the project. e�:--f- PLANNING CO 7 iii TO47,TAFf REPORT CUP 85-36 - TARG-cT Sr OR ' August 13, 198fi Page 3 � Y 4. l� R tf u11� i tte IM Mk E X11 er City Planner : BB•DP:ko Attachments: Applicant Leer k EXhibi t "A° - Vd ci of ty Map E�xhibit,"B" - Situ Plan Photograph Resolution with %onditions ofP" Val g Since�re�ly,� e-Tames R. Manson Senior Project Engineer /kmb B033 car Steve zrwin, 27-553 Jim Westling, .R.c. Industrial X., A Division of the Dayton Hudson Corporation 5 tl 4 ;t Tar'yef'Stores 3^ e(jyiicth Street Box f F i3A2 (A'm " apotis, Minnesota 55440 -1392 Telex No. 6879103 t �1 October 4, .1985 � l ✓�. rya CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION - TO WHOM IT PJAY CONCERN: f 2'arget has consented to the paslcang of a construction type trailer on our leased property at 9022 P, ttSb4,rg l? venue (see attached site plan for exact location). This trailer will be occupied by (3)- three employees of our principal trucking ines Leasewa Better Home Del' g $� Y- very Division. The normal business hours will be 6;00 A.M. to- c;. -00 P.M. The Cond'it'ional Use Permit is requested for this iocation because of the proximity to an electrical �. supply f^om our pump house. This is also out of our normal traffic flow. Thank you fnr your consideration of this application. Since�re�ly,� e-Tames R. Manson Senior Project Engineer /kmb B033 car Steve zrwin, 27-553 Jim Westling, .R.c. Industrial X., A Division of the Dayton Hudson Corporation 5 tl 4 ' Yarget &lures Wotern Distribution Cer i _ 1.( Newport Drive R�oho Cucamonga, California 91730 Telephone 714 +980 -1366 A y April 29, 1986 i` City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department Planning Division Attention: Dino Putrino 9320 Baseline Road, Suite G P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 s Subject; Commitment on the CUP Length of Time and Plans' Tor Permanent Facilit=ies on Temporary Office ? Trailer - Target's Wes'.t'rn Distribution Center Dear Mr. Putrino: This letter is to advise you of Target's plans on the CUB length of time;- id plans for a more permanent facilities to replace the temporary office trailer now in use at our Western Distribution Center.. Target is currently in -the closing stages of escrow on 3 piece of property on which we will build a permanent facility. Construction pf this permanent facility is scheduled to start late next month. The scheduled move in date is set for February 1988, if not sooner. At this time, the need for the temporary office trailer will no longer exist and it will be removed from the Rancho Cucamonga facility. If you have any further questions on this subject, please contact me directly. S1 cerely, 9 Steven S. Twin Facility Operation Manager Western Distribution Center SI:cs 40 A Division of the Dayton Hudson Corporation E S 1l a It�A Iz1 I,i r7; +V.1 A. !) r 1�� " jt[s, -2 "�� re '`� CHURCH f ST v. eaneel ° sG� s♦ Hu rmrypHEKSi$ 'µ ornr y�.Y ♦i IPC'� ot}o y �'r,•� HEMLOCK $ >t ♦ 1 ♦a r f /r, .FC o Y� g` i c aSnFpHO tl sT AYE , . TERRA V1SYA �."•K A iT ♦r 7 rA.t -.» , 1 t1 WbN OPWbFnM/II l E K �y,e. iORYA4 S En � NKK OiYr; ' U 'EPEE. R ♦ 1 L r w <i s a EfEN ST. 2 c* CSG� b, "`nrf4 .`♦ 1 sr r'li°LgA.. ,, t fg air YtK �CiA .. w 1. °r 3 DGtRY S7. t Ipycp rt ^� CN 1 w .Wi. yrY _ = a _ GT 4T s ? •�On!♦4ri�nS .i4u Jt )gj(CSil6sfaiyJ0ynC 1Yy y77H �2) t �. 7 } ERYILZ 1 pry �.� K 3 ^.. •, avJ�CMtN' i• .t ��. � 1 ... kflo'rG�RaNI q'�((,$. NiMiY Q6 � S:'�:.i 2 PS;HIRE¢$T �111E - HAM74MiAE ST.. E.. m EAUR LAV• �C �M E AtYPTUS �' c HOMES - Barton Z .5.. Renenn�uCanlptrya 212 J cvcLStsrv. Plaza OEYON try--- » - - --- AV • 15' . Ot + < t' A Cu:aT+on4a Bull" sa Pa k I ; S � PIACEE7 5T c CA p :t O 1 t.w 71 BUSH7 @0. Cente �i 4 +eanJOa a rw.�a CAM ON _ ` I z .K.. ARROW A ' �t wv y i ARaow a --f p 1 A N 6 AL nHE sr m� S „I 4 fAji MlRQ' 12. t E f O Li NAST _ / , sibi E It t E b 'CAEST�,IpP 1 t• .0 ^' "CY ! E9S SWO. S C z....ST ✓P 7TH -s, %T <7TH < 5T. ZIP CODE I i I' 71730` 6 x r_ Renefw Cyaamalga y M SNARON GR O EJiJEUbufiOn CeniJr � O io C 6TH � �G sr. crit 3 � sr, iti a a 14 a AWTN00.NE rte„ SYCAMORE � DR � R i p [', NortMiaw 33 Re '1 _ ENTER DR �� V sTtil St TN.DEMARK S 9Alk fTJAJk QO�EANDER 4� JOSHUA jL ts-- ffO.T., THOMA54T Z 4TH ATI1 5'f. ' ' g 1R7. 00 .NDARY O NGRUENt WtiN CIUfY 1.Nf5 10500 yp COyN� Yt <RD^ OH;RMQ �""" —L"5'e W tlfy" T W19m Gunn IanafAah ZP CODE 7 PrMARE q �CIS a A R. SCSTENTAL 6A; I\nRTH y - � gs,YwlAacAY CITY OF RANCHO ITrum. AW CUCAM01NGA TITLE - ,4 PLANNING DIVISI(DN EXHIBIT. —A ,1 SCALE- AZ n rl R. �e r 1 ;r®Til 31 4 CITY or, ITG4h �cl!' B5 - 3 RANCI-10 CUC.AA,10 \'GA TITLE, SZZJ,5 P444f PLANNING DIVISION E:HiBrr- ,r a sCALF_ " S _ 1-1 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING CoMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 85 -36 FOR A TEMPORARY OFFICE TRAILER LOCATED ON TLC- EAST SIDE Or PITTSBURGH AVEM,UE, BETWEEN NEWPORT DRIVE AND 7TH STREET IN THE GENERAL /INDUSTRIAL /RAIL SERVED DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 30th day of October, 1985, a complete application was filed by Target Stores for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, an the 13th day of August, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public nearing to consider the above- described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Caamission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: { 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General - Plan, the objectives of the Development Code,, and the purposes of the di stri c.1- in which the site Is located. 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvaients in the vi ci ni ty. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. SECTION 2: That this project will not cveate adverse impacts on the envirom►en an at a Negative Declaration is issued on August 13, 1986. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 8536 is approved subject to--tfie—T-oTTowing conditions: I. An architecturally integrated skirt shall be added to the base of the trailer, in order to screen the trailer supports and utilities within 30 days of this CUP approval date and to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Plans shall be submitted to the City Planner for approval prior to installation. 'c. Potted trees and exterior plants shall be provided along the south side of the trailer within 30 days of the CUP approval date and to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Landscape plans shall be submitted to the City Planner for approval prior to installation. t- PLAIl,ING COMMISSION RE3'UTTON NO, a CUP 8; �6 - TARGET STORES Augu�4i 13, 1986 Page 3. This.. Conditional Use Permit shall be limited to one ,year( fra1Y, the date of approval, or t),e vacancy of the Target Stores;% from the subject Warehouse Facility, whichever comes first. 4. The applicant shall comply with all Uniform Building Codes and State Fire Marshall regulations and obtain any Necessary permits for the installation and electrical connections for the trailer. ' APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS l37 DAY OF AUGUST, 1986. f PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF— ,�ANCNO CutiMONCA r BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: d-Bu ero epuuy acre ary 3f I I, Brad Buller, Deputy Se�.retary,of the Planning Commission of the City of , . Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resoluttbn was duly arid, regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on 'the 13th day of August, 1986, by the follcwing vote -to -wit: t. AYES. COMMISSIONERS; NOES; COMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: �d 21 L CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 13, 1966 TO: Chairman and Menbers of the Planning Commission FROM; Brad Bull er, City Planner B14 Bruce Cook, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12671 - LEWIS numb - r ne cocas aQver opment of a resi aentiaT s�di vi si onon aT M.0 acres in the Low - Medium Residential District (4 -8 du /ac) within the Terra Vista Planne' Community into 122 single family lots and a 3.32 acre temporary school site, located on the northwest corner of Milliken AvenuL.. and Mountwdn View. Drive - APN 1077- 091 -29 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of subdivision map, precise plot pTar; and building elevations for the development of 122 single family homes, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Project Density: 5.81 dwelling units per acre. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoid n . North - 7ng a ani y ones ract 12670, under constr. tion) and vacant (Tentative Tract 13271, proposed condominium developmer' ` Medium Residential R .4 du /ac) within the Terr '(ista Planned Community. South - Vacant, ;r anned as sing ; family homes; Low - Medium _ Reside . >'al (4 -8 du /ac) within the Terra Vista Pl<,,;nned Community. East - Windrows, vacant; Low- Medium Residential (4 -8 du/ac) within the Terra Vista Planned Community. West - Vacant; proposed elementary school site within the Terra Vista Planned Community.. D. General Plan Desi naticns Project Site = ow_ a ium Residential (4-8 du /ac). North - Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac); Neighborhood Commerci al . South - Low - Medium Residential (4-8 du /ac). East - Low- Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac); Medium Residential (3L 4 -24 du /ac). West - Low-Medium Residential (4 -8 du/ac). ITEM F PLANNING COWTSSION STAFF REPORT TRACT 12671 LEWIS HOMES August 13, 1986 Page 2 U E. Site Characteristics: The site was previously maintained as a vineyard, u as since been cleared, and now contains neither any vegetation or structures. The site is bounded on three sides by street; Terra Vista Parkway to the north, Milliken Avenue to the east and Mountain View Place to the south. North and east of thr project site, at the southwest corn_r of Terra V Wa Parkway and Ailliken Avenue is a proposed village townhouse aandaniniW development. To the west of the project site is the proposed elementary school site planned for future development. An existing Blue Glum Eucalyptus windrow currently exists along the tract's eastern perimeter in what is. to ultimately be the Milliken Ave nue street al i grment. The property within the project area slopes southeastwari at approximately a 3% grade. F. A licabie Regulations: The Terra Vista Planned Commrnity pernn is one a ng per 3,000 square foot minimum lot site to approximately a 7,200 square foot maximum lot size,, in a conventional subdivision in the Low- Medium and Medium Residential designations. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: This tract is located within the Low - Medium esi ential (4 -8 du/ac) Land -Use Designation within the Terra Vista Planned Community. The proposed minimun lot size is 3,500 square feet, with the largest lot being 7,120 square feet; the average lot size is approximately 4,000 square feet. The approved area development. plan for the northwest quadrant of the Terra Vista Planned Community had originally designated this portion of the site for single family subdivision for the 3000 series product. However, the 5000 series was discontinued since the approval of this area plan. Lewis Hanes has proposed development of this tract with their "French Village Series "; traditional center p'rot, single - family detached hom ,_-, that are targeted for the first -time buyer and move -dawn "empty nester ". Both single -story and two -story floor plans are proposed. Architecture is of a Neo- French revival style, implenenting the use of casenent windows, french doors, entry courtyards, and window molding. Bright accent colors are proposed for building trim, and a unique entry courtyard wall is to be provided between facing units so that they will share a front entry courtyard (see attached Exhibit for typical front yard courtyard plan). B. Temporary School Site: - The tentative map indicates how an adds ti ona envy =m ne lots in tie northwest corner of the proposed subdivision could be subdivided in the future on the is site py'esently slated for the interim school site. As Terra 11 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TRACT 12671 - LEWIS HOMES August 13, 1986 Page 3 Vista further develops, a permanent school facility will ultimately be built on the adjacent vacant parcel to the west of the interim school site. Therefore, the proposed subdivision to be considered by the Planning Commission is actually for a 122 single family lots pl u. 3.32 acre interim school facility. However, Lewis Hanes has also provided a Master Plan showing that how, with elimination of the interim school site, this remaining portion of tome project will be incorporated into the existing subdivision design. Tract maps, site plans, and grading plans have been provided for both the proposed Tentative Tract with the school site and the Master Plan showing the full build -out of the future subdivision. C. Design Review Committee: In their report to the Desi gr. Review C99 t ee, s a presen ed concerns that the proposed project at�,sign of traditional, center - plotted, single- family homes on smali lot subdivisions (less than 5,000 square feet), was not consistent with the goals of the Terra Vista Planned Community in terms of providing a variety of housir types and densities, and an interesting diverse streetsc;.•�:. Staff's primary concerns were of a perceived dominance by driveways of the streetscape, a;. _ the small buil di ng separati ons resul ti ng i n an overly dense streetscene. However, the Design Review Committee felt that the use of architectural variation, front yard landscaping and courtyard walls was consistent with the policy of providing streetscape variety. In their review, the Committee was concerned about the flat, usable private yard space that was being provided. The Committee directed that rear ya,1s less than 15 feet would be acceptable provided larger areas were provided somewhere else in the side or rear yard. However, rear yards shall not be less than 12 feet. Lewis Homes has - revised the site plan to incorporate this direction of the Design Review Committee. D. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee revmewe. he projec an a ermined that, with the Recommended conditions of Approval, the project is consistent with all applicable standards and ordinances. E. Grading Committee: The Grading Committee has reviewed the conce al graF1 ng plan. The Grading Committee is aware of the subdivision's design foo the shared frontyard courtyard. treatments between facing housing units. The Committee was concerned that the proposed grading scheme using a series of retaining walls between lots that face onto the north - south running streets was not conducive to the shared courtyard design. Therefore, the Grading Committee has recommended that "D" Street be uuried deeper into the ground so that the street has a much less degree of gradient. In this way, there would be less f*71 between adjacent side yards and the need for retaining,., ;gills would be greatly reduced. r- -3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TRACT 12671 - LEWIS HOMES August 13, 1986 Page 4 D F. Tree Removal: There is an existing Blue Gum Eucalyptus windrow within the proposed alignment of Milliken Avenue. Milliken Avenue would be constructed as a part of the development of this tract and this would necessitate the removal of the existing Blue Gum windrow. Therefore, per the requirements of the Tree Removal Ordinance, Lewis Hanes is concurrently submitting w1th their proposed subdivision, an application for tree removal of this windrow for consideration by the Planning Commission. A Master P an for tree removal is attached tar the Commission's review and consideration. The Terra Vista Landscape Suppl ement cal l s for reps acement pl anti ng witi, :anary Island Pine trees. G. Street Improvements: The proposed development will su— s6 tantially increase the traffic volumes for Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain View Drive. On reviewing a total circulation pattern and development progress for Terra Vista Planned Community, staff recommends that Milliken Avenue be constructed from Mountain View Drive north to Base Line Road with full improvements a. the wes side and partial improvements on the east side of the median for Milliken Avenue. The construction of Milliken Avenue will reduce the impact upon both streets, and provide a convenient second access route for Emergency vehicles. H. Overhead Utilities: All existing overhead utilities have been placed underg—ro—unirin conjunction with other projects. I. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist and found no significant impacts on the environment as a result of this project, There is a pctenti -1l noise impact for dwelling units adjacent to Milliken Avenue. A noise study was prepared to assess the situation and propose any mitigation measures, if necessary, to achieve noise levels that do not xceed the City standards. All findings of this noise study have been incorporated into the Conditions of Approval. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order for this project to be approved, the Planning Commiss ion must find this project to be consistent with the Terra vista Planned C a►munity and the General Plan, and that this project will not be dettIment to adjacent properties or cause significant adverse impacts. It must also be determined that the proposed use, building designs, and subdivision, together with the Recommended Conditions of Approval are in compliance with all applicable regulations in the Development Code and the Terra Vista Community Plana 7- - -I PLANNING COMM SSION STAFF REPORT TRACT 12671 = LEWIS 40MES August 13, 1986 " -t Page r IV. CORRESPONDENCE: 'This `item has bvt,.i advertised as a public hearing in fffF The Dail yy Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices were sennT ,si ta. perty owners within 300 feet of the project Y. RECOMwENDArION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract 12671, subject to the Conditions of Approval, through adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Oeclaration. Ve t'uliymll er City Planner BB :BC: ko Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location /Site Utilization plan Exhibit "B" - Area Development Plan Exhibit "C" - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "D" - Waster Plan for Subdivision Exhibl - "E" - Site Plan Exhibit "F" - Master Site Plan Exhibit "G" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "H" - Master Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit 'I" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "J" - Building Elevations Exhibit "K" - Master Plan of Tree Removal Exhibit "L" - Typical Courtyard Plan Resolution of Approval with Conditions a 4 R TEAR 1 Ia1701t Si p3. �: r.asaR Y % 1c7.N0 %'i9ii2 x t _ 1 Kwl o. a vw aRY• Na 4 f�i�pu 41 +�� WOjL I.V 6 1� L�lay 41 ° T'11YIEEnm71 ftti.? TENTATIVE TRACT tyO. 12671 Kwl CITY Or RANCHO CLCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISIO:`+l' rr -Eo Y.� fAt)ItTH ITE,ii: 1 1 � T TITLE 41 IAe E.XIiiBl -. " eR SCALE- AREA DEVELOPMENT PLA; 4 TENTATIVE TRACT tyO. 12671 /H THE CITY Di 11AHCYo COCAMOYR4 COUNTY er SAH RERHARDIRO STATE 0r CAI I *%",A •�• A"1; 3 t LOTS aE 3.000 E• Amt I S 1 1 ' , y sae. i. �3 t •. ` ]'TACT `�� � i] } ftk-A TO—om IFii DWICIL _ _]CHTAT(K i a0. SAM 1 1 `! TCYTATIK TaAR RO. 1371. /�� f h•,� ,Z I'LLAM �.�� ��� � 1' ay.ENIESaE TLNiAnK TaACI RO. iaalt4 � i • ! ' ter' ti. r � 7 3 1 �C ' �J 4' J V Y •• t r T } ipf �� - -r � • �� YERDED J_!�. IF 111 ALL- A CITY Or RANCHO CLCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISIO:`+l' rr -Eo Y.� fAt)ItTH ITE,ii: 1 1 � T TITLE 41 IAe E.XIiiBl -. " eR SCALE- SITE UTILIZATION AND NATURAL FEATURES MAP TENTATIVE ?ACT NCB. 12671 iM TXL CITY Of MAMCXY cDC4w0g0A cDOMTT Or VAX 61MRAMDIMO. MTATV. Of c ,LIrORMm 5N.E. ILI LOT. Or 1rDD..r. �. 31.0 AcVVV j Aruc is$, 1 a NORTH ' CITY OF cat: � �� RMACHO CUCAMONGA TITLE = PLANNI \G DIN'ISICN EXI EDT tI 5C VLD ' t TENTATIVE TRACE' NO. .2671 Oa]L„WYCa .cw y••.... ��^'�� Y` I%r%L Me Of *4*,!"* CYCANO%OA� rUt t 1� -�. " �, �Aa %WiT� �t"� 1 � ', � GOY %T•( of ]471 aga%AlIIt%O ltATt )i CAi1�OR , .- �.•.'- '_..`- ,',-^ "��� h ��.•— y ` - rte.... • 1,� e { .�J 4lo A!• %It .fsA 9r.4 ACRW 't 1 "'��" �. ��. {� ✓`,,, �,wN.. i rSl tors 2]00 (i✓f.O iCRti.iYK�I ./ _,,,,�.•. �✓ Y I.w {%Y % �. tlt &Ora I%r?ala/ j scffio ... ...yet - ( 1 � lam✓ f7 "'� , J"��� , •.�,1,/_r'aa .uJSr e \ � ,—'— (� ✓''ply ff rr c �. per 9 1 NORTH CITY OF ITEM- TtAINC HO CUCATIVIONGA TITLE: �. PLANNING DIVISION E\IjtW, " tE SCALE- ��✓j� �. _.; may„ 5 n���..�YIY••+^'r• t ��. �,J H^`'r tY -� ✓ /1. �� \��•.�,�.AA�Y'� IV Id F.Acr- TEMWATiVE �. \^_ T'��'r 1 \•- ^'+.�J. iii'" i�'tt `�`y,•4 _--r'� i'i '—ter_ 1 -�' � \ .Sp i!� � tiC •\ t5 !�.yy5 -,�� react No. to too L• o ~ 1 i ��• z: 1 TENTATIVE TRACyC NB. I'd671 el— COUNTY Or IN TILL CRY OF %"CNO COCANONOA dAN ■lt tO1NA trATC OF CALIFORNIA ArtIL lfas 21.0 %CR2A e U•' •�t��` \may + s� TaaLOrsara.aooa . r. ' NORTH C1 1., i or, ITEM= Z �_ I A xINCI O C ANIONGA TITLE= PLANNI1Cy It'I5M sI3II3iT: �' SCALE. .. - .,,- w i _ TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12671 d . QRLLNWtcis N.— " ��r _ .�"�" IM THE CITY or lAlICRO CUCANOMQA { L' COQRiV 0 !AR R /RNARQIR6 STATR Of eALIFO. ' _ • �"_'" Y' APR(& Qlrf 22.0 ACRES kP' ,... a/ I •t; ,�s : i ,r •w+.' / AS$ ions or 3.300 S.F. po . ��yitl� 5f..�a• 3. O r . r w , x ...... (� �y ` ^^s•L:<<+' T ,,; ! r yt.n3 ♦c VIA •K I � G% ad v NORTH CITY Or RANCHO '-'1L'CAi�fl0\' --Tti TITLE � -� PLANNING DIVISIGN EXHIBIT: __ _ SCALE; scNO°'- of L .i N-�"'. ' arm* �,yr HIM �r� tee• � ! � • � // � �y`� �f' V NORTH CITY OF ITEM: — -J�- F�t�i�'C�tO CL7c. 10�,T( TITLE: PLANNINC DINrISIGN EXHIBIT; W SCALE: F -11 • , ; ``�' -- DETAILED S TE PLAN TENTATIVE ,•� TRACT NO. 12671 tCil C M w l�� y `� �Ax IM 7ME CITY OF RARCNO'CUCAMOXOA COUNTY Or SAM aln"ABOIRo STATE Or CAt1TOS �.T A ►Bit I1Bt SC.O ACARB (I:B.O ACBL4 INTER ISI tors .. saoo Br L07 S INTERIM 1i11�• • ,�•^ =�� _,.- rrl'SS -1-Y � � �..-� S, t_ mrB�'6� '� '7.�iL.c�N � �:. t o\ scNO°'- of L .i N-�"'. ' arm* �,yr HIM �r� tee• � ! � • � // � �y`� �f' V NORTH CITY OF ITEM: — -J�- F�t�i�'C�tO CL7c. 10�,T( TITLE: PLANNINC DINrISIGN EXHIBIT; W SCALE: F -11 ar. I _aLL�' ��� SNGGT r� B. 1t it AMENDED TEwAT" \ :. TRACT NO. 12802 r "A _ 0 5 f cG It t I I•-�a i L t� NORTH CITY OF ITEM is _. rT RAINCHO CUCATMONGA TITLE =_ PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: " •°' ° ►SCALE- DETAILED SUE $Lq�Y �.. TENTA'EiV�IVE TRACT Ad ©. i2671 TNG �\ LT CRY' Ol LtNCN0 CUf ANONW COUNTY OF SAN 11"RASDINO fTATG Of CALIFORNIA APRIL ST66 21.0 ACRES: LSI LOTS OF 3.500 S.Y. 1 Y 5 f cG It t I I•-�a i L t� NORTH CITY OF ITEM is _. rT RAINCHO CUCATMONGA TITLE =_ PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: " •°' ° ►SCALE- J ------- ' t ) DETAILED SITE FiAN TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12,671 IN THE CITY OF —S—O CUCAKONO4 O�6WICIa. .wi V �•r' t/ _ ✓ �QClITY OF SA #Rf.RYF1101'IO STATE OF CFItFORN4•R [f �,lyt. \J`.�• 'S � S `i� ..'.. _ «r � .- ........a �wr�. .r. <.. S ,`` APRit l ?tt 21.(i -ACRCS t °.•�/- '~_I ,+s•w JY� ' ©{ ~ ,I• Ist LOTS FFCOI.F. Q ?d � 1 �µpy,T,Yi O � ass �e.� �TyxFtx�t NORTH CITE' CAF T ITE1i: Z ell RANCHO CUCAMONGA -TITLE: PLANNING DI tTISICiv EX HIBIT� SCALE A us f Y fM aren°.v c•e. r i � � AV Al --"w APRIL 1996 ` )st wrs zsw .... t737 Lora Larenno It TY9'C.AL. COTO AIMACV ILAN Mt.. al ��_ � �✓ •, � � ' � ., � err'+ "��,.._'" _ �`.• •e_ fir/ 'ti 7`-� �}� '�..,C '? \ NORTH CITY Oil T ITEM RlNliC ("U Al TITLE= PLANNIi\G DIVISION EXIiIBIT- " � SCALE- 6'r ;; '\` `_ 1f " �s Lam•« E ,� - Diu. � ,..�,.�.- °a-�,�.y.�,c•,,�, � i �._, �J __.•��° =� '^�- �- +- �= i;.f4�, ' �{��e -`^^ �%= .�'- -'^ __ry c � -rt% � Ell �,,. ��•,�a. _i] -- y t�•"`j.� ^ ^�'� err - W6' ; � y � � 9RfIbM /.I toll AMMM) TENTATNE\ �- TRlCT NM PRELIMINARY GAAD;tNG AND DRAINAGE 1'i.AN[ TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12671 OF S SNa CRY AR OF W1CT0 CUCA OF ` ` e _.'`SH" • ®. COUNiYAA aapN01NP STATE ra OF CALYFOpN1A � V� ul_y 4: ..ti.•rw 1� \� � t �_ .-_ ` "am spas ss.o Aaass I+ ` �+ lil LOSS OF 3.000 S.F. tR iLcrxa NORTH CI'T'Y Olz ITEM: RANCHO CLCATWONGA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: " ''�" SCALE: ____� PREFIMINAnY GRADING AND DRAXNAVE"PlA TENTAME TRACT No. 12!41r1 •:• Mv OF RANCHO COCA" DERNAMOtMa, $T&T. dxGA Ank I � APRIL 1956 28.6 ACRZX I lsj Lots 3SOOSp. R6 N% 4v " qt j_=_326 ow TYPICAL unto- _ V r. i ^. •r : _ 'It Yj ......... T C4*_ qw It NORTH CITY OF rrE:,I= - LV-.P, RANCHO C Ov\,10,Nak TITLE- PLANNING TWISION, r-XfIIBIT- SakLE. �,ySOtt rwi 1#/ .rr M tIp.C�L �{ � FAAtWAY N,M•�' TL>t4A YS3T,rM,�..r #. Ae_SIId O i�ir�► 4 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN TENTATIVE TRACT WO 12671 r""' �• IN THT CTIY OF RANCHO Q'ICAHOMOA n' COUNTY OF 904 AXEMAROIRO STATR OF CALITORMIA •'•�R f AFRR. 19941 21 .6 ACRLf 41`\ isTLOY9 3500". .«suer ra#sl fiIORTH r CITY OF ITEM: RAINCHO CUCAI\floNGA Tnu. 7.14r PL NI \G DIVISION EXHIBIT W<a, s" 2HLET - YIIlEM AYE 4AAWWbb W AMENIMD TENTATVE TRACT NO. ,2002 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12671 IH THE CITY of RANCHO CACAHOMEA NT COUY Olt SAH SEIHA.OINO _ STATE O7 CALITORMA. awn +au✓wir +w.a..r... � �._ "NIL 17114 21.0- ACHES �. Est LOTS or 2.2410 S.F. t i =1 1 5 1 i- NO RTH S 4 RANCHO C.TC fUNIOeTGA TITLE- -L�J* -Z-A lm �4 PLANNING DIVISION EXH1I3tT11 L-D- -` '� SG1LE: -8 e ', CITY GF iTC�c: RANCHO CLGUNIONGA. T== • TLANNING DIVISION ENT iiBtT., ..-L_ SCALE, NORTH - .-n, FRONT ELL-:i?AT!ON NORTH FRONT ELEVATWN CITY Or, ima: ls(ol� RAINCHO CUCANDNGA T' ITLL. PLANNING DIVISION k4 FRONT ELEVATIOM FRONT ELL-:i?AT!ON NORTH FRONT ELEVATWN CITY Or, ima: ls(ol� RAINCHO CUCANDNGA T' ITLL. PLANNING DIVISION 3M 9 C��- NORTH 'y 01 iTz,,i- BLAINCHO CUCANNIONCIA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISR-,.-,. -SC,kLE- L t" 1 r NORTH CITY or, T ITEM: ; t24-7 f RAI HO CT "CAN TITLE. -,2., f -S , j PLANNING DIVISION EXI ilBIW ' SCALE: ml Pud4 -1a6 1� m iZ rlD oil u „ PIAN 4 -164 w 1 PLAN 4-160 NORTH crcy or ITEM; RANCHO CUCA,11VIONG A TITLE= PLANNING DIVISIO N E`:i itIiJ1 u u . SCALE: F_ TRACT NO, Z 267 " ItANCIM CtIChPInHGA nTS OF SAO S . AT'91L 1544 r2fitiJi ], wx Oum "MI'lu. 1— nAYHfn GFOOI- W -OW. TO W nQMft Vc"cal ;x 11-14 RrAm TtMTATIVO In4VT 233sl PLAN i i�. 13 NORTH CITY OF ITEM: i-i i PN-'INCH0 CUCAMONGA TITLE: � 12, 2 PLAINNING DIVISION SCALE: *'I *I t COURTYARD PLAN ag Mi W Ski: IDA NORTH CITY Or ITEM: RA]NCHO CU&UNIONGA TITLE. PLANNING DIVISION F-XlilBIT-- T. SCALE. F RESOLUTION NO. N tW A RESOLUTIOM ,k THE PLANNING CD14MISS10R ► OF THE CITY OF,., FANCHO CUC MONGA, CALIFQRNZA, CONDIT "s.JN'.LLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP fro. 12671 AND DESIGN F. VIEW THEREOF E WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 126771, ;ereinX Zar "Map" submitted by Lewis Homes, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated ins the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardirlo, State of ! California, described as 21.0 acres in tie Low- Nedium Residential (4 -8 du/ac) Land Use Dezignation within the Terra Vista Planned Community, locat -d on the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Mountain View Driver - APR 1077- 091 -29 into 122 lots and a 3.32 acre remainder parcel, rc-gu i arl y came before the Planning Commission fur public hearing and action on August 13, 1986; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set Forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Punning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at t"e public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga doss resolve as fellows: i SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard toi'enta'ive Tract No. 12671 and the Map thereof: (a1 The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Deveiapment Code, and specifi= plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Developmant Code, and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to htmans am, wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely is cause serious public health problems; (f) The dEsi gn of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. PLANNING COMISSION RESOLUTION No. TENTATIVE TRACT 12671 - LEWIS HOPES August 13 1986 I Page 2 i (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration i s issued. SECTION 2. Tentative Tract Map No. 12671, a copy of which is attached eFe o,is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: 0esi gn Revi ew: 1. Each lot within the project shall have a minimum (2% slope or less) rear yard open area from building to property line, or slope /retaining wall of 15 feet. In certain situations, rea- yards less than 15 feet may be acceptable provideb' larger areas are provided elsewhere in the side or retr, yard. However, rear yards shall not be less than 12 feet. A final detailed site plan shall be submitted for the review and approval of the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. 2. Front yard landscaping is to be provided by the developer. Each lot shall be provided with a minimun of two 15- gallon trees, shrubbery, groundcover, and lawn planted in combination to provide a pleasing a, aesthetic environment. A variety of landscape design shall be provided such that each lot presents a landscape design unique unto ii'self to achieve individuality and ;4 foster a diverse and interesting stree:scape. All lots shall be provided with a permanent, uiderground irrigation system. 3. Street facing side elevations, on all corner lots,--and the - treet facing elevation for the second story of all two - story units shall be upgraded with addit)oral architectural embellishments. `these architec:':ural upgrades shall be included on the architectural plans ar;: shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Planner orior to the issuance of building permits. 4. Corner sideyard fencing and/or retaining wale shall be set back a minimum d;stance of 5 fei:t from the back of sidewalks. 5. all corner lots, the sideyard between the si dewal k and the sideyard fencing shall be landscaped and irrigated by the developer. 6. A!! retaining walls visible to the general public .. i .e. , on the street side of corner sideyards and within the front yard, &re to be constructed of a decorati -I material to the satisfaction of the City Planner. All wood fencing installed by the developer shall be treated with water sealant or staining. T- -9-1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUXION NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 12571 - LEWIS HOMES a August 13, 1985 Page 3 7. Landscape treatments at the end of side -on cul -de -sacs shall be designed to provide an open view into the interior of the cul -de -sac. Design treatments shall include the use of decorative wrought -iron fencing and sidewalk connections from the sidewalk to the perimeter street. 8. A 6 -foot high masonry wall shall be provided along the tract perimeter adjacent to Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain View Drive. The wall treatment along both Mountain View Drive and Terra Vista Parkway shall be consistent with the existing design a ong Terra Vista Parkwa and shall be submitted for review and approval to the Planning Division p *:or to the issuance of building pewits. The walls on Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain View Drive shall be staggered and off -set to increase visual interest. Landscape maintenance easements will be r- quired where perimeter walls encroach onto private lots, and _ are tv,- be dedicated on the final map. Final planning of all fences and locations of all easements are to be determiner prior to recordation of the final map. 9. All mitigation 6easures as indicated it the submitted acoustical study] necessary to achieve vise levels consistent with the City standards shall be incorporated into the subdivitlmn design. This shall include the provision of a 7 -:foot high masonry wall along Milliken for Lots 53, 54, 7;35, and 136, and the provision of dual glass (3116 Inch) 'for the master bedrt im of Plan. 166, Lot 55. 10. The conceptual grading plan shall be revised so that the gradient on "D" Street is lowered to a eliminate the need for side yard retaining walls for the street facing lots. A construction grading plan shall be submitted for the review and approval of the City Planner prior to issuance of ;grading permits. 11. This approval is granted only for the subdivision of 122 single family lots and a 3.32 acre interim school site. The 29 lots (lots 4 -19, 82 -84, 97 -106) are a Master Plan for future subdivision only. The subdivision of these 3.32 acres i nto the shtiwn 29 single family lots shall require a separate tentative tract map application ind pubii.; hearing by the Planning Commission. 12. Each driveway shall receive special treatment in order to enhance the appearance of tae street scene. Such treatment shall include a brand of brick or speciai concrete or border treatment in like F - ag 777r{ PLANKING ". PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLU NON NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 12671 - LEWIS HOMES August 13, 1986 ,a Page 4 13. The interface between single family lots and the interim school site shall be provided with a temporary landscape and irrigation system. The selected d9si gn treatment snail be detailed -i in the landscape/irrigation plans and shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Pl: ier. Tentative Tract: I. Milliken Avenue shall be constructed from Mountain View Driva to Base Line Road as follows with the first phase of devN1 opment. A. Full improvements for the west roadbed,,, B. Full median with landscaping, C. A minimum 18 -foot wide pavement for the east roadbed, and D. Lidewalk, street lights, and landscape not required beyond trict;houndary. 2. Terra Vista Parkway shall be constructed from Tract 12365 to Milliken as follows with the first phase of development (except for portions already -constructed): A. Full improvements for the south road l,441, S. Full median -with landscape, C. A minimun 18 -foot wide pavement for the north roadbed, and D. Sidwalk, street lights, and landscape not required beyond tract boundary. 3. Mountain View Drive shall be constructed from Tract 12365 to Milliken Avenue as follows with the first phase of development: A. Full improvements for the north side of the street, and B. A minimum 26 feet of pavement for the roadbed. 4. Drainage control devices such as paved ditches, A.C. berms, or curves along the streets shall be installed as approved by the City Engineer. Ati —A-1 0 PLV1%;ING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, T£NTATIYE TRACT 12671 - ,LEWIS HOME3 ; uqust 13, 1986 Page 5 ,l APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY 3" AUGUSf, 1985. PLANNING COMMISSION Of THE CITY OF X,40) CMAMONGGP BY: enffis L. sou , hain„an ATTEST: Brad u er, epu Seerer armry I, Brad Buz "ter, Deputy Secretary of tiie Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify thalG the foregoing Resolution was duly and J regularly introduced, passed, ,and adrpted by the Planning Canission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission hod on the 13th day of August, 1986, by tha foil M ng vote-to-Wit: !" AYES: COMMISSIONERS*. I NOES; COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 23p I,,.. { S .41 N K� O n. eN ov yr dtR _ •'`L'4 ". ••a nT ao N a Yom. •• � c �•ON w� nL p� ^D $'ate ocLO•. u 9g N«a. �NC..wC Z V Y....�r C L 6uu. qa, Y� L CVY aL�_ Qu�yc � viY"E u�« 4c•�o� Vie. v.,. w. r O �22a..Y °Cd N 4�0 O c= ^.OqU ,SLY. zis Wu Q 1 d d L 4 O« G i V V tom. r 5 N 4 C ^I• N N e«i 9 N Y y Y C r« b.4.0 n c -Ou O ; 7Y A " C a^ 8 aOYVa64L T C 1f. 'RL gQ O c L . T b w OL "4 D O p LxV 6V Sa a4.RLyrO N .0 _ L �� 4 m S W a 0 i °u u ° o — N S w. y-rt =d 49 T 4 w. M wY N p O « aii N Li ° u yY0 Y d N um p ■�NZ °{4j��- � G i u C G c Y V N C C O. 9 CC E C q6L� «L J Y O CN. �• >��Ua4i� u. a» Y C M G �I ry a5 v •+ ++ �. N _ N c L N >t Cl n V tY. ° L F .p qr gdY�va 1p V Y W °u °- � dVl 4222, V 12 4 m L L p ui E cinori Yom. a o °L..i1u c•�caui "6_ .. > .: u. a �. Fc.°+� wY� �to�E Qo 2.�. `. as ° m. .°•oa'Y' �� . 5n oNiN q >° T Nr cNn .ate. oc 4 nVY° Fp"V'b Vt! 09 VUa as Ct �nm t 'tea✓' °. aC�C =�._ -.p 6°�a99 V� xO�a NUS V�:N G �•.° -C'� pL _q � o.. LL•r G�c� 6F nu^xo� .�:= .o. i.'6•.L � a -.s 2 rl CNt,Y u�p« r ^u .non sa.ani acn m N «`a oM... p,.,s' Said OYOY.�O LN 6N.�r:L qCa Yw•^ ^L wsSY fjb gONO YwYF Fl igC9.iw V «>'s 7.ba r- -z A u Y ,2 ° '^ q cYY v. P L u•OO O:V V N • .r L �.OL•c. Y� �nN a G C°^ L Y V J •} O d S G `r Q p„ °° Y A« Y !. G V d LS . L a. a Y G O S• L wE> ,p aay,.4 Lrt� ...0 ^E��•YiY3 'ti '.` pt Vtiw �.•`. 6gCY mC aYUQ.� d 1. 3, ca.... xv Q.l=�n wN a aLq o you uL a'u v1' °woy =04= wq$ar¢i v'• cw t'o �� °1n.cv ,pq $ ae om' cwp� ��... Y^ bid 3p y.°•. ,"w,.° v.. F e w «°_° Lc _ • ��Yt �F xrc N L L YOI"` _YYI� 3^ L .o Ca9 �C d C TaV1 by., ° °l.C~V4YY`4 } ^w3 3w; Y" °« d ZDTJp ON ^N. -.NY •� y1 -x1'UV � ?G � 40 va. YrT V L °1 'W ^b ^c GJ G y? F o. aL 34 N 0 O� L�. yC np L,O a C a oz °CV CY66 yV 9H Ly Y�FtO YY t� a6La�0 �p4L Vda Ya a V YmC 6°4C pO�pxNL^LF %O 4°.N �pe•e COY x y�`F .F S S• I! �N M 4 VII ti 1 b � . �a =v wtic w d. =u a.'c+ ^:: ° --o p b 2:1=7.. - -.in o1 -i °o€ 1^i. L - 1 4 °w G 4p .v iF �'.� g� o.$ c a��a `��LY °iai c'x' i�` •' tea. g� 5 °a '~'dO �c d.,c°. .`aw ¢uy qL i~ L 0 3x=u •xw,'ai1• v 6p> �q «u ^,� N.,c a..gwc ^i >a° �"td. V —°•.G� x «'m asla°n re a^ h� �'vs � w-•.. u �o+�Nw 3'd u.•i �.0 j ..a A�� °•y.¢ ^0.. a� r.0 a �. y..� e.+ n N C d q N L e° L e. T Y '•' a• � ^« i d x C N • d W G s� L 3 Y ^ 'p C �J qM Yd L Lyyq V w°-y ° uOVLi V .V w�aa 4 cd p6O1L ;0-� Li qV,-v� c,L;: N C�E� 2Zs K4 '^; Y � rAL b0 W9 ^� ^OOL O• ¢1\'�°n2 ¢LW ` °�.• cQ'YF °OV ^YT ..G.0 pn"0i .ol Z 4• n O b2•°cv U'Ctl O C c ° V^ C b .� 6 d N L.w 0 0 w �°• c L ^► C�Gin� L a x �- >Y . L 4' w . aqL `° OnQ cFM yi• b6^ "^ C Jr �^Vy qFw ^ +3.'c. °� N L d .NCB... ,a c6 yn ^�. ++r ,�. z.- a'•u ^YW �� dw«. w^°a °6j 9o'q'c Y:� °Y4t °a N «tD NT V4U d6FF O CN �y L� ^yS T cV n. �y�f1� uV p V� ^L wSJV co N^ Ti �"LMVVt VOT Nap b aNb u� LWy YC. �°3 yGq Cdy cM aY OGM � ~ ^�� yOC n e.M c O.•u L Ce N °yCC b d Op n� y i€ o• n G ... F ,c q ... ^ a d H d y L d L 3° �^ u Y C? V t°.l 'n 4 4 6t ^ Y j y W- C t'k" Z u E iw Y a J R d u 4 u� V iV aOV q.+pl+ Y-.•Y NCip 'H•.°.qi pY T -SA F 1 � 3 11 an �; pr Y ��a ♦, nY Mw w-1 C\` p1C�L_ yVY� K 1i C�V ^k b9 aaaa:L r-_i @ C a.L °no .i.• 41y0 •. °�.., t H .°L.w r 2 Y q Z _ wx w wbe°. v rb` b c u w� . .0 x 1�,bw nay.. icon° ° °,iilw�u.a va •- '�' obi °. In c u�aNT N ^� .. �`. Yua xi o`I -.., �RL°, 5n uu y`i«tl ar J L ClypY NVy wM� � rL dpp Ny dNC aN° nM �0. .wwoLa .�w9d 11. <4N vC bq 13b- 'L.- 1S�`Yyt;y Cav N.yr CC 6r uaiu N Lt ffL K' v g 8� �."a9 �CL PC ^ � N` wei O z L .51 � L 2", L «. L d �O g.. S^°i1 L Y w L y Orn YI o b .` yr- n �A�M b= YVC bC t b Nb Y.N °NM eA.«n ry ... _ «u )I b 7j y1 ydM brN C N y d IR 1� byy L i I-- b N L ON 'S p N i rN. .n V -'"HI RE- Ny�M }L p Lam. 6p9C+ bD rlS�na CR N. Ra. u by � C b sO -48 10-1 1 0^"' u wry° IIF,So b L^ Yt N C M N L b¢4OI x OA N Op e L C y~uTIY.. ."e b d N Z. g Av4bNy O� ^ dp =�N c .:u e.�. c••b "'-.p 1^n o?ssvc�anae�c $ °iac wiv N+` bN 4N !w iN9 FPM ;` 4$�'u qNV ^ ^R1 >OI _° <AT OR 6Y sY a- 0n z3p a ww by r n 9^ �1y 'FJ ro¢ w C ��. d N d L nn bAt, ^ « b nT. nb 9 • C C n 6 M i P. z e G C L T N R, 4 d LaCyT aryV �{ A EY4i. CO b9 Yq�} 'flC .'4.. pL !N T = �N� VCaa C Y �� N L7 l.Yab O� 9y °' bHE wOi °us'v �M b °a °}ILo r «yalj W r6C � i 2 d'd' nno.N u° an.x a.>vsy •� o 'Yrto Zz i .p NwtaL y,. +ce^ g� °. NM N+�! +�' v » =a N N ^ }� tf « Z w V OY �� W L N a s b4 � ��. C♦ j. q Eu4e Tua yu NwUN a v Rb�'w c «b w Gq s n r.+ _•�. o o ''S UCH... .. 'CCC ="Z r', 1:7 D C v CwNO tis�m > <xa lyil t =-nlnn �C C1 <v roa +A !oo O+ CNdw° o ww «In+°. 11 C G , +.�q O ✓Nw ✓O. n . �y % ✓�OO E✓ l G r SN 6 CN . ? A. U✓ b N T .v O Y 4 t d.+N ✓ L c M,:J r E Gd AJ EwT Nuo. r > G.O� C.rP 'OILS C`� t7 a N � ✓LJ V pNNN � GY E"O SCC� S. ✓'r >r i G r10. Y •. >/OVU.p d� 3 ii �RE biJE UrMJ OvOW yo-EOG A >LUR ✓OUbO� ✓. EN. b N b F� N> N ('• O 4 V w G y r s. y N✓ .Y b d +id TO �. nOdY Li.•^£c � r9 yNN�E O'fGO,'d'�u r Y.2 Gbu- �YL d�• j0 s d7 Aw %r dF GAG V O ON a 0 ✓✓ J RL S d N+ d N y � ti G O G w r q d G V ✓ O 60 N b q L Q, 7 � ✓ d V TT N� A. d C �� � b d 7A O ✓_� aN N ap ..°, ° Zd y9 mr rn uT+d ✓d d t �. o- op b � j. a b G A E O dN � p l f V O d C✓ Fu ✓ p O, S GkI�A DV �UV A�.N V Tr'e+v •1�J OGEE OGb a� °y J� _ li N:r Y f1 U b p E Q n N ✓p i. � U p q O. y A✓ O V E p E N q C .n AEb SLq �p�opO YiM1 iOP W �p ✓ �e19 N.dV CO P9y M QV - s'.' ✓ �/ ✓ A d N p � Y o �- o.. W r L S � U p� E G > d A U. • d Fb l� N a„ ✓ N CC �. gwG r0 U .� JL t'f �Y Ars GEEIN Nb NrW V d dq.Gi 1 ✓Oy ✓YU gd✓V:r dTCe 5 NFtOr >Ea �N OAy AT q > Y•' \ Jr0 NA7 P ✓G.O NrA `} 4J OwVG .�OdNNw r ✓rEG ✓�,> ayS , ICP rGO d3 OA GG. ✓1i✓ IG r ^�'. ✓ Y G ��ddb N. � . pNrG WO.Y d V.rU oQ� J N. YN9q �t Yy bw'G• Ncr Yr NMrbd .7y t' �✓T✓ dJ y nd ✓� rnJ;G �yN d✓ P�Y r Y�WY P X ✓d O ✓✓ �a0 N. P O W AY Oq 6P06 AQ.rGY rA r d �N[t} P O d d t C Y✓ T S' w N P � p � � T ~ = u 4 a ~ ¢ r, Z✓i' ��, 111 ___ .✓ c AV oy:o Nd ✓✓ ✓�' �YO C UA ONS G A L 4 A .O Os � N9f ✓ r A O L y A r G Y. p r dO �p Y Oi dy N� d N r.0 d p. G G S V G F P J aO 'r L N✓ WY ✓W d 7 C Or.O+y �i4 "�✓ � Gri G uL'Y^C �✓ O'T � 7 7 N G pW.O d d .O O L C q ?r N Y T C N � r •pp � U� NCT N�U duA 6th; d.0i. bGC xu ,Z y0 y Gr0 rp d��. NN y dOby Od .G v M r d Aq b E •pr C✓ O G 7 O' A .i t d p G cyy y ✓, p N Z L d V A 6 16 T N r E �•�r' '� ur OOS I U V � p✓b ✓ Ab qb UP G r. S r✓ ✓Q D•,> 6 0'• p L w i✓ d T G O q A Prp U V d '* 1 15 PqY � ✓w Y + q .GiY i0 l.f ��UV,b y ✓:O✓ br' �d O,U S6 n' T N06 G 3 ` GSiI'�.d Y p✓ �b V G N. r O R MO. S A. M m N6d xG > •'+ A O r BBS r N 'S O b O� ✓ Y C 6 ` < b .n O N >Qip � N d ✓iN d✓ Gb�6 NNNr + w� �d A�. ✓ NTH OaN Q P` G A N Y +I P N O> V d N d p y N> P y d ✓ d U tl 10. �. ✓ r d' q U q p A G N d 6 C� a ✓ �� f0- ryryY yYO- GZ O G S t W lrj. Aj q q +p a ✓ C d Nr dA OEO ✓�A ON 6 O � ur J6 U.O" }Ni G � Y G M T N i U G, � N d�" N p.✓_ T G N > r 7 {i.0 N� T O db UO� . CNO p O Pb Pt �r p PN ✓OrS TO ✓UAd P T 3 . C O ✓ E p N P' T. U qq O qtr } � rVA`y d P ALA yYL A�3 b6G G Npy > yd 'd 0�,E+,5 O.r O`fj � i•�e'.. �OC7 �"C J PLO GG Tb+ r �G,q ECG ✓CE bN �O �i� y{l ✓,U �I G � e GSd< A N iJ r.✓ > .J pUN GO tA, N AY a 4 G m � b� + O q✓ Y d 6 SZy tdm C � �,7jt \�_ {5.4. 4N ✓UG %d Nw U✓�O � �A�^ �A .�.difY T A✓ G Vp. y� NSr £r L N � ✓ Y T .+ . •nL C1L NL CO, tC i rt � i "'oii i4N - � O d ONO map ' c z n a L i�o buc C dor° n d u c M I L 0 wu�i `D4 Cw Pi O 6 V+L+ 1 N AS ^N E O 2y, p b aN�o ,aRtp 4p'i d� Cda A CaCm ��j. d= N 9qY C .Z. LOS aq u q-2 w R a N� �MMa Vu Rte.-. �'p Y y 4 b A ♦� A 6E. y uV d %' T pDw i A +�fi 4E y) a.�.� ° q 'O �A 4� 3f � C .y C5 4.W.✓ a ETC E ` cc gCg a M .� O r a p• A A b. GY ~ -Y }� 44 AR ? a L ¢6 4 V Y.. N V- C » L a b E �» AY `i R-0.0 A d w b U� • � � W ¢gI � �rt °1 y 6 L p j ro = y d N4H0. A (w� Lp4� jrt�.0 p rat-, wV� w L '° C:G O< V ro.F G 4 Cr ti WE L L M s 4E "qv�a ~ RL qU Y aL Ln �sc EE EE a 4 u UA p �AN aC R wq'o. �S {L3A0 C9aai CO.q O � x�ui x U °..,, LG a L p, . V� 0.+° VE ✓+ v M 3 U ». w Y V yt� J A q 3 0 9+rlM Q W ' iiV . Ly L l �p 1 L N 82 4AA It V` G J C1L NL CO, tC i rt � i "'oii i4N - � O d ONO map ' c z n a L i�o buc C dor° n d u c M I L 0 wu�i `D4 Cw Pi O 6 V+L+ i F AS ^N E O 2y, p b aN�o ,aRtp 4p'i d� Cda A CaCm ��j. d= N 9qY C uY°. aTgg a N� �MMa Vu Rte.-. �'p Y y s•p � q b A � R 0.� • � � G q O i A +�fi 4E y) a.�.� ° q 'O �A 4� 3f � C .y gCg M .� O r a p• A A b. GY ~ -Y }� 44 AR ? a L ¢6 4 V Y.. N V- C » L a b E �» AY `i R-0.0 3° W °1 da N° dgOn ugLa°iw Y ro = � N4H0. qu Lp4� jrt�.0 p rat-, wV� w L '° C:G O< Y.y N4 WE T q awg u 4E yb ~ RL qU Y aL Ln p �AN aC R wq'o. z C Z C . V� 0.+° VE ny GR ' iiV . Ly L l �p 1 It V` ° 'u �U 6D quA� .. a aro S.ED 4rD fR Lu 2t o-u.q ° N..°C.T42 �y uD Nya ua °,y N� .°.. ua. ,emu m ac L-N O 4 - C I ° R4 4Ea . L WNb wVV �.Q i1�a2 4u.40 u F <°,U F° 4 NI 141 a� � > �L i F �7 r � . w.cs• -"p o O O Y N L q�G✓ -0-i d O O� C ✓✓.. x 7 J9 ~ G ~ GV � • _ �W I` c O �" N t✓ UN N LYO Td T N nE V.G1 Ny. ✓jt E N 9 �. �x C d j r p s P a �{ �. u• �• Mya° -d D JNO J JT CNd'd✓ p n C C gt b d' N A p9 eJ ✓ Cd d Ao drn� J oo J °.J i(-e cG O�u AA °:+✓r .°� �..s �..mvnu p ,,.. �.. L^U o p+R N TJ O M O C G b✓ C ✓ r U r.. w L T ✓ N d N p 6w a A i N xi.. j 4- N ..' J.°r p G p •. Z 9 -Cd Eyes, C ° 'O Gw C✓ fi F r ,•C„ b.�� CrY AG7y NYapO W� `J.6d p, rd app r_ � = ACU �Ar. q.. a? EN � C✓ ENV y Fr O 6 C yP A dr".. C• a C LN bE�• 6G 0� d ibG td V qr✓ �i d ^a u d YE NW NE C�SpD G T ✓. qFC GO =n '". ,-r u' c < �E rw d N4✓ �.��' r pSPy- Ny�O MN rL� MW E.y CyV y V b. V > Wry Ss V •[L D J d. r� � •. •1+ f� A N Y b � pYJ NE �1 _•7�y1_ •-� � C Y •G � J G Y. J2�Zi dd G p JCL .Ur GlJb ✓ K 9O pr G5 uW D•E J �L > E a -DW MS Nb VE 66 JO V�� J d wJ N✓ ix �L- a r L d> p d r W O° NE yb yELlq, yiT p,p � 0a Y U Z A DLO• c ac ao wG y �Y E°Gpp'r d Yd r N: C° r ry w/. N w d p, N U YGu dp J dD� - y Ep N� NV:LT. ✓•. O• O E. y d d ss u r G .JAN JjU N t .. A—A .....r...... ','.._ 'ells N � � u p wY• G °� d r r d � c 4 r:Ay u � u M r � i 1 l H� o�v W •YD 6 D r FS 6 r � O .°r Jr- � � 10• � T P d O 9 y �ry d t Z 41 i± dY u V A 4 U Ctd L V u aai L uP b = t 0 G N n 6 E E a� � L4Syg1 M N N q� UZ ° c E L �o �qa q E L N Lq Y•' N Yd � C A� ��� V LV S.. L A S p q L L cl e f s L L A L y u G YL �� 1� L Ca d G ^ asc Y N.p.gG a o L v� qa '9'. N U N > M y O uYLi N vo. d q u U N L Y A. j6 c Fy' nVl A. C E N G-'tid U L d d r+-u,6 qu. 2 NM d a8 Guy L 9 qO Tq .. y pL Cp. Nb.' 4cL 4 q �l0 N qS:n 4 ^J F+9 Ead. S� C = �� 09 qu �L YY �.d CaY CT tl O N ECE 4 6 O Y a Iz 1. a 7j C T^ ay E 3 W uu o• -.TL, r. Q xo a Yq A u a i n^ Y V i n M i Y V b� N Y tL m> e C i ^ � °s d? qd w OL € G v L V pM CY C 2 v 3 I.: t 0 q lq.Y 9 y.N � L4Syg1 4 • �o �qa q E L N •- c�� • v. qA o L r y. $W ei Y L Nov q0 T� Y L L LY G d y dU y .: V at+oc Eo a o L uYLi N L� ba p `9i' L d N G-'tid N w U �W •� OWN Lp O.L Cp. Li9 n5C rn- F+9 d C T^ ay E 3 W uu o• -.TL, r. Q xo a Yq A u a i n^ Y V i n M i Y V b� N Y tL m> e C i ^ � °s d? qd w OL € G v L V pM CY C 2 v 3 I.: DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: —• CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT August 13, 1986 Planning Commission Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer Barbara Krallz Assstant Civil Engineer ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSFtENT AND PARCEL M,, VbU4 - UICKER- WARMINGTON - i v� sion o acres In o parts s an E: 7,—t e ei orNood Commercial District of the Terra Vista Planned Community, located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Haven Avenue - APN 202- 801 -25, 26. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Renuested: Approval of the Parcel Map as shown on Exhibit B. Purpose: To divide 15.3 acres into 11 parcels for the development of a shopping center which is being presented on tonight's agenda as CUP 86 -05. C. Locatillri: Northeast corner of Base Line Road and Haven .Avenue as ss own on Exhibit °A °. D. Parcel Size: Parcel I 0.64 acres Parcel ,7 0.63 acres Parcel 2 0.31 acres Parcel'8 0.89 acres Parcel 3 3.23 acres Parcel 9 0.82 acres Parcel 4 0.36 acres Parcel 10 0.47 acres. Parcel 5 2.44 acres Parcel 11 0.77 acres Parcel 6 4.78 acres TOTAL 15.3 acres E. Existing Z�oning: Neighborhooai Commercial District of the Terra is a anned ammunity. F. Existing Land Use: Vacant. G. Surrounding Land Use: North - N rsery s'cWool and single family (Terra Vista). South Vacant. East - Single family (Terra Vista). West - Single family - Mobile hone park. ITEM G .. p..: �.._.�. .... a a... ..,. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PARCEL MAP 5504 - DICKER- WARMINGTON August 13, 1986 Page 2 H. S•irrounding General Plan and Development Code Designations: or - Terra Vista Planned Caffi-Ruffi- South - Terra Vista Planner: Community. East Terra Vista Planned Community. West - Low (2 -4 du /ac) Development District. I. Site haracteristics: This project site is vacant and slopes from north to—South. II. ANALYSIS: The purpose of this Parcel Map is to create separate parcels or a individual buildings within the shopping center project on tonight's agenda as CUP 86 -05. Exhibit "C" shows the proposed parcels superimposed upon the CUP site plan." Existing overhead ,utilities are located on the project side of both Haven Avenue and Base Line Read. Staff recommends that all the utilities be undergrounded (except for the 66 KV electrical lines on Base Line Road) as a requirement of the development. All improvements are required to be completed upon recordation of the Final Map. iII. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:. Also attached for your review and consideration is Part e n :a1 Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental checkiistc, and has conducted- a field investigation. Upon completion and review of the Initial Study and field investigation, Staff found no adverse impacts o.r the environment as a result of 'the proposed subdivision. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding proper y owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input and elements of Tentative Parcel Map 9504. If after such consideration, the Commission can recommend approval, then the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. RespeLtfullyysubmitted, BRH•BK:ko Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" Tentative Map Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Resolution and Recommended Conditions of Approval Initial Study SOUTHERN PACIFIC R R BASELINE I ROAD CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMON'GA ENGINEERING I)IVI..N tV IMM• PARCEL MAP 9504 17TU.- VICINITY MAP FIIBI►h �� A „ 6 -3 r, 3 � Y. t: r aft ' 3� c��n 1£z _aaSs aii xs: �ai7 Asa 3r i � —� ii i.3rr i 3i 1 a 3iti rs � "s: 04. ........... idr a38- AVENUE oY t l { 1 .l Z. i� tip r ` tip r ` lcl CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGDWXjaNG DIVISION G ;J �I CLiF Srf °ii5 5&e Afa; �I'I'LEa cvi�ln PaN.el Lrwte5 �n: M h tr� GENERRL R E 0 Ek� . cP -10 985 NAQEI f EN' RON 1,,,ENTAL,REVIEW APPLICATION INITIAL STUDY, PART I +-or all 'projects requiring environmental review, this form must he completed and submitted to the development Rev%,v Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Planning Division staff will prepare Fart TI of the Initial Study and make recommendations to planning Commission.' The Planning 0ormnission will make one of three dete:-,ninations* {1) The project will have no significant envirgnmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, (2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or (3) An additional information report sho +?d be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the pr sed p,,oject. Date Filed: Setitenber 11 Y485 Profeet Title: T j-a�Stista villa e _ Applicant's Name, Address, Telephoner Wattninoton Properties 11.60 S. Harbor Blvd., 2iillerton, GA 92632 (714) 773 ->1500 Name, Aodress, Telephone of Person To Be Contacted Concerning this ?roject: x xbert Nadel & Partners, 520 Broadway, Suite 400, Santa Monica, CA 90401 (213)458 -1818 Attn rYci Sato Location of Project Northeast corner of Baseline Road and Haven Avenue Assessor's Parcel No.: 202-:801 -25 and 26 List other permits necessary from local, regional, state and federal agencies and the agency issuing such permits: Building p.xmits Fran local Building and Safety fok ccrostruetion of new retail buildings. Grading pest, Encroachment Lt. prat and sewer is from local. Public Works Departrwnt„ I�-T r, 55 PROJECT DESCRIPTION # Proposed use --or proposed project: CConsturttio_ n�of new retail shopping renter. ,j E Acreage of project area and square footage of existing and proposed buildings, if any: land area = 15.3 -- acres: proposed area of new buildings = 144,291 sq. ft. Descritie the environmental settinu of the project site including information on to,..,graphy, soil stabilitf, plants (trees), land animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, land use of surrounding properties, and the description of any existing structures and their use (attach necessary sheets):_ Project site is now vacant laid which gentty slo_nes.from north to south. it is basic211� free of vegetation from recent rough grading work and no existina structures are present This_shobnina center is a portion of a 1.321 acre planned Terra Vista _OMMMtY Dwrelomient. New single - family hems are beincrconstructed at north and east sides of the site alona new Valencia Avenue A Ux4- e bcIre park exists across Haven Ayenrie at west of site. Recently constructed single- fani.ly hares eaa.st across Baeline Road at south of site. Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a wholp have significant environmental impact Refer to move Thy, =-IeCt W-11 n i �crs a s_igni.ficant envirommntal im3act. 6 -d I -2 CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Planning Division. Date: 9/6/85 Signature L. ep C11T.' °- Title Executive Vice President 6 I -3 401 let '> LIALI THIS PROJECT: YES NO L Create a substantial change in ground contours? 2- X Create a substantial change in existing noise of produce r °w vibration or glare? .� X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal SelrviCes (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? X ' 4. Create changes in the existing Zoning or General Plan :csignations? X 5• Remove any existing trees? How many? ! 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or expla, >ives? X Explanation of any YES answers above (attach additional sheets if necessary): 3. Pddition3i d errand for utilities (water and sewer) due to camercial asps. 7. Estimate the amount of sewage and solid waste materials this project will generate daily: 31,000 C 8. Estimate the number of auto and truck trips generated daily by this project: 00()t trios daily 9. Estimate the amount of grading (cutting and filling)- required for this project,,in V- rc yards:___ Cut, 8,100 C Y t - Fnit 35 nnn c Y t 10. If the project Involves-the construction of residential units, complete' the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Planning Division. Date: 9/6/85 Signature L. ep C11T.' °- Title Executive Vice President 6 I -3 401 let �L RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The following Wgrmatton should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division.''in order to aid the school district in assessing their ability to accommodate the proposed residential development. C:evelopers are regr;ired to secure letters from the school district for acs l*6,dating the increased number of students prior to issuance of building permits. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Specific Location of Project: PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL 1. Number of single family units! 2. Number of multiple family units; 3. Date proposed to begin construction: 4. Earliest date of occupancy: Model# and # of Tentative 5. Bedrooms. Price Ranae RESOLUTION O- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MHCKD CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVIWG TE14TATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMIER 9504 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 9504, submitted by Dicker - Warmington, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 11 parcels, the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, identifies as APN 202 - 801 -25 & 26, located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Base Line Road; and WHEREAS, on August 13, 1986, the Panning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above - described map. FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVFD AS SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1, That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of V.e proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affect.. on abutting property and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Parcel Map Number 9504 is hereby approved subject �,O'" W attached Standard Conditions and the following Special Conditions: I. The striping plans for the project shall be submitted to and approved by the City Traffic Engineer prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Catch basins shall be constructed on 'the east side of Haven Avenue, north of Valencia Avenge and shall be connected to the existing channel ovi the west side of Haven Avenue or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer 6-10 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PARCEL MAP 9504 - DICKER- WARMINGTON August 13, 1986 Page 2 3. Existing Overhead Utilities: a. Haven Avenue - The existing overhead utilities (electrical and W ecommunications) on the project side of Haven Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole south'of Base Line Road to the first pole north of Valencia Avenue prior to public improvement acceptance. Reimbursa;tent from future development on the opposite (west) side of Haver, Avenue is not possible, because the property is already developed. b. Base Li ~6 Road - The existing overhead uti l i t+ as i %ei ecommuni cati ons and electrical), excer c for She 66 KV and larger el ertri cal on the project side o. the street shall be undergrounded from the first pole east of Valencia Avenue to the first pule west of Haven Avenue prior Lo public improvement acceptance. The developer shall be el i gi bl e for reimbursement of one -half the established cost of undergroundi ng from future development as it occurs on the opposite (sotisth) side of the street. 4. Intersection catch basins shall be prov;ti ',ed at the intersection of Valencia -id Base Line Road. 5. Clarify, to the satisfaction of the Building 0 Fei ci al , how the oroperty line provisions of the Unifsrm Building Code, whapter J, will be provided prior to map reccrdaticn' APPROVED AND ADOPTER THIS 13TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Yenrn s L. Stout, Chaiman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission ii the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the Foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, pa=y .,. and adopted by the Planning Cmi ssi on of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the Lath day of August,, 1986, by the following vote -to -wit: 6-1 .. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. // g ?ARCEL MAP 9504 — DIMER- WARMINGTON Aug,,st 13, 19$6 Pagc'3 ; AYES: CtMMISSIONERS NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERSs s t a \i �v �r C A C 4 bl C t 'x a°+ C V� .. _.. • --"T.- °"^.:'mac. �°"T'^t�1'x,^ l h" El J �a �i r C Q in w • "o �cVY v 4o y. nA9 V5. �4 b wG 4 `y AC N 4� � N Ya�� 40.r'rGi yyQ +Ev r.O 4y c0: �• !1 O� 'O C, t DyC rC�.. gg 4:Y ax Y Gb •q NN Nro n'L ^4 �. ^� A �Mb �Lw roai CG ffV �Qb C� MC 4 6 J W ate. S.� a ti N c rotq� °b,lg OO 4 ya+ O.a L C «?, Ce4i 4G dep,. Y." Y S i r WY N4G0 GdNc �C U C 6 p tQ t NAY i K ��ss a = d M1 ro b $roY ClY GAL HU br. IJYt pA� y�CY rci &ZR aZ; OYU L3 wuYi w• G1 G ° =b Nu°n 4a� 4� iml! t co GAw bN r Y V aiO K -01 WV Cg .bin CV .G+ h" El J �a �i GK bly' N Ya�� 40.r'rGi r.O o$ �Y �• !1 O� m�.r �Y uqr .��� C� a V4' 6 6 J W x° 4t rotq� y, � 4 ya+ O.a L C Ce4i 4G dep,. Y." Y S i + t N4G0 GdNc �C U C 6 � . 9 N t a = d M1 ro b y 6y1 yS }.G du LJ V. br. IJYt nQ NL i It YC GAw bN Y V aiO K -01 WV Cg .bin CV .G+ . rz h" El J �a �i d ^g Nd « M q C R u ez a uLL a D VN r d x^ L a L G L V is o� d N d 6 U H d �-• N 17 � VIUI Y= L O ti�u V No f^m° u`T un b V LI) ' 6gs L.^ � QN tee q. ° uf, Ny w 'w V•N di u °� � Tm u «D 1 fia °'ee yNc 5, o• yu A Yyv Q p E� ma + a ju N ,oTr ypA tTCN a ��F' r9 p � pA QF V Ci C< u ^'D C L yL N d N N 17 cy •- `o A ^Pr °n c � .� •yam. ydy � LO C^ 2.2 yg u Ayr p aL.r`CgL j �aE O f of !I c4'c' w x Q CE O Dj� a a, Y+ Sy A ^P ydL C `°Y�^ c q G - .p1 LO > p °' VV W •� mL r u de irN caD ^vim L Dy.. C L x O I NV �y G C -'n. p uj . Z O X N b R d ^g Nd « M q C R u ez a uLL a D VN r d x^ L a L G L V is o� d N d 6 U H d �-• N 17 � VIUI Y= L O ti�u V No f^m° u`T un b V fD.l° ' 6gs L.^ � QN tee ° uf, Ny w 'w V•N di u °� � Tm u «D BE w 4 tf GN V d ^T y-. f. E� ma + a ju N ,oTr ypA tTCN a ��F' r9 p � pA QF V Ci C< L2'a C ^'D C L 62V N d N N 17 yLpC L LOda L ydy � LO C^ 2.2 ML v A Iz b V fD.l° ' 6gs L.^ � QN tee n ou ad % as u «D BE w GB °I 0° j D 1 N E� o U Agw d ywC •`+ ,oTr ypA LL j p � pA QF V Ci f°na L2'a C ^'D C L vu yi xp JCL. p° %tV� CLLW �LLLLe yLpC L LOda L ydy � LO C^ 2.2 yg u d 4. p aL.r`CgL j �aE O f of !I N f LJ 11 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: 11TTV !'.T1 D A *T!"1TTA 11T T^ . l.TA1.Tl1 t B vaaa a avaah as Vv Va1111V11 V" STAFF REPORT August 13, 19bb Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Nancy Fong, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENi AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 86 -05 - 1W.WWWAKMiNUI UN - f ne aevei opmenz or an r ntegrazen shopping ceffe-r-16T approximately 136,700 square feet, which includes a total of six (6) satellite buildings where one satellite building is a drive -in facility, on 15.3 acres of land in a Neighborhood Commercial District of the Terra Vista Planned Community, located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Haven Avenue - APN 202 - 801 -25, 26. Related File: Parcel Map 9504 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of the neighborhood shopping center, sire plan, elevations, and issuance of Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Uce aid ?oni_ng: or - r care Wv ert r si ngi a family homes; Medi um Residential District (8 -14 du /ac). Set!' th - Vacant, si ngi a family homes; Medi um Resi denti al District-(8-14 du /ac). East - New single family homes; Medium Residential District (8 -14 du /ac). West - Single gamily homes; Low Residential District (2 -4 du /ac). C. General Plan Designations: Fro�ec r e - ei or ood Cmnercial Dist0ct. North - Medium Density Residential (4 -14 du /ac). South - Medi um Density Residential (4 -14 du /ac). East - Medium Density Residential (4 -14 du /ac). West - Low Density Residential (2 -4 du /ac). u. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant and slopes gently from ;.artF i°c I south. V � - `ion consists of native grasses. The nort',jeast corner of Base tine Road and Haven Avenue is designated as the major Sateway to Terra Vista Planned Communit which requires special theme and landscaping treatmen�. ITEM H PLANNING COMMISSION+ STAFF REPORT CUP 86 -05 - DICKER /WARMINGt'Oii August 13, 1986 Page `L E. plicable Regul ;tions: Shopping . centers are permitted subject Ap to a Condi ti ons se"`permit within the Neighborhood Comrmercial designation of the Terra Vista Community Plan. II. ANkLYSIS: A. General: The proposed development consists of three (3) major anc— o— nanely; Long Drugs, Hughes Market and an unspecified major retail store and other retail shops that are arrange' in a concave building configuration. Six (6) satellite buildings are proposed inciuding one fast food, drive- through restaurant. They are organized in a pattern of clustering two satellite buildings together with a small parking area in between, The proposed Building C and 0 are clustered together with a major plaza aria in between, with special design treatments, t) reinforce the Terra Vista Community's identity. Plaza areas are also being provided in front of retail shop Buildings 2, 3 and 4. A major pedestrian connection at the site entrance on Haven Avenue that leads toward Hughes Market has been provided in order to break up the expanses of parking area i n ' the middle of this site. Strong pedestrian connection. throughout the site has been provided for promoting convenient and safe pedestrian movement. Also mounding and screen wall are provided to buffer from the adjacent- residence -. Major accesses are provided from Haven Avenue, Valencia Avenue, and Base Line Road. Access for service and truck traffic are mainly from Valencia Avenue which is screened with bermed landscaping. The proposed elevations project a strong statement of California Mi sai on style. It includes such architectural elements and detailing as: towers with subtle variation in design and detailing, curvilinear gable, quadrafoils, oversize cc,ncrete columns, trellises and arbor., arcades and massing of the building. Detailing and other arch +ectural Ql ements have also been provded to the rear elevation of the main building s?i ne that faces Val enci:a Avenue for creating visual interest. A related Parcel Map is also being considered by the Planning Commission at this meeting. Staff would like to point out that the proposed Parcels 3, 5 and 6 have property lines bisecting the buildings. According to the Uniform Building Code, any accessory structures such as trellises and arcades bisected by property lines must be relocated 10 feet away from the property line. As for property boundary between two buildings, they can be mitigated through fire walls. The City's Chief Building Official has placed a Condition of Approval requiring the developer to resolve this issue to his satisfaction. Staff recommends that any changes to the approved building //Z PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORY x- CUP 86 -05 - DICKER /WARMING ON August 13, 1986 C _ Page 3 elevations, trellis and/'or arcades, if required, should be submitted for City Planner review. If the changes are major, the City Planner could refer it to the Design Review ConG:ittee or the Planning Commission for review B. Design Review Cammittee: The developer has been working Or 1 ! gently i ith staff an with the Comm ttee, who has provi ded design guidelines and criteria for designing and refining this E ! proposed. shopping, center. The C&Ai ttee, at its regular duly a 3, 1986 meeting, reviewed the fi nL t' design of the project and f` recomnended approval subject to the i`,ollowing conditions: c 1. Site Plan_ P -.,,The planter area located on the east side of front driveway on Base Line Road be widened to at least 10 feet and the pedestrian connection be added. (Revised as shown in Exhibit "D') B. A pedestrian connection be a„ued to the planter area located at the east side of the second driveway on § Base Line Road. (Revised as shown in Exhibit "D ") C. Parking spaces in front of the major retail building and drug -store be elimianted, except for handicap spaces. (Revised as shown in Exhibit "D") D. Building pad F should be oriented on a north /south access with a single parking area provided west of the building. (Revised as shown in Exhibit "D", however, final design subject to City Planner and City Engineer approval.) Es A reciprocal parking enforcement clause subject to the Sheriff's Department approval shall be recorded with the Parcel Map. (Conditioned) F. All decorative walls should be of compatible material such as stucco or concrete, with decorative caps.' (Conditioned) 2. Architecture: A. Instead of the symmetrical twin towers, variation of tower height and tower schemes for major anchors should be provided, (Revised as shown in Exhibit "G1 ") B. Heavy wood rafters be added to the roof overhang. (Conditioned) , PLANNING COMIST jiON . STAFF ROORT CUP 85 -05 - DIC;tEti`C OMINGT04 August 13, 1986 r , Fa ge 4 l j� '4 C. Additional architectural elements /details be provided to the rear elevations such as strengthe Ing the top edge of the parapet, subtle roof height vari_ati,ons for the retail shop buildings. (Conditioned. also see Exhibit "G20) D. The-' design of storefronts should compliment the architectural program and should have subtle variations, suhiect to Design Revieid� Committee approval. (Conditioned) E. Architectural detailing and building ,material s, as listed below, should be su;d'ect to Design Review ' y Committee approval, non-slip M.-X,'-ran t l a should be 4 used for texture pavement; concrete walkway should be of heavy broom finishing and colored throughout the site, Concrete . I umns should be of integral, color f" stacking of roof tiT,,e at the edges; accent tile should be of ceramic design; and stucco finish should be of lumpy smooth type. (Conditioned) ' F. The design of signage shall compliment and not compete with the architectural program. F (Conditioned) 3. Landscaping: A. Berming and special landscaping treatments such as increase the size of trees and num6Pr of trees and shrubs along Valencia Avenue shall be provided for screening and buffering loading areas. (Conditioned) B. Cluster of tree plantings, planter pockets in, front col umnsr,' be provided on the length of store front area, `,n particular, Hughes Market, the unspecified major retail building, and Longs Drug store. (Conditioned) C. Tree placement within plaza areas and along arcade should provide fo, wind mitigation. The quantity of plant material shown on the conceptual landscape plan is deficient and should be designed to meet the City standards in areas of number of street trees, trees around building frontage, parking lot trees for shade, hedgegrnve for screening cars, etc. (Condi ti oned) '4 ` PLANNING � ,[AR,"°G"= ' August 13, 1986 Page 5 � ^ ` C. Existing Overhead "Utilities: Overhead utility lines are located on the project M both Haven Avenue and Base Line Road frontages of this project site. Staff recommends that all the utility lines less be placed underground, except for the 66KV electrical lines on Base Line Road, as a requirenent of the development. P. Envi ronmental Assessment: Staff has completed the ,ntaT-C-ne-C-RMRW, has determined that the development Of this project may ekpo�d pea��e ir property to water related hazards, such as flooding. HowdV�kr, a drainage study has been ' / submitted for ,�e mitigation measures -0 alleviate the got-fifti! "',"flooding or, site to the """.^.act/w" of � detemined that there will not be a significant impact in this --~ because the mitigation measures, as recommended in the J study, - ~ ~' ^ - - If the Planning '^x,vv concurs with these . findings, issuance uf a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the General Plan and-TH-e-T—erra Vista Planned Community Text in that: the shopping center provides for establishments - stores -the community, it promotes convenient accessibility for pedestrians, and autonobil',es and promote maximun opportunity for transit uses; it promote' human scale, pedestrian oriented environment; it promotes social interaction and minimizes adverse. environmental impacts and resource consumption; it exhibits the highest standards of site planning, archiiecture, and landscape design. In addition, the proposed use, building design, site plan, together with the recommended Conditions of Appproval are in compliance with the Terra Vista Planned Community standards and all other applicable provisions of the City standard. The project, with the added mitigation measures, will not cause significant adverse environmental impacts. IV. item has been advertised in newspaper and public hearing notices were sent W dig within auo feet of the project site. ' ^- - - V. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission . .",= " Negative Declaration and approved Conditional Use Permit ` 86-05. ` 711 1--11,11 W. -,", -- It 71 PLANNING C0MHI S SI0R , EP0RT CUP 86 -0y - D'I`CKER / "1iRIN. ' N �'. August 13, 1:985 Page 6 Exhi bi t 1 7t-;r -,..L revati ons Exhibi .. Re fully tted - Plaza Araa Bra ull - Proposed Parcel Map Exhibit "K" City Planner- r,. Exhi bi t "0 - Parcel Map BB:NF :ko Attachments: Exh bit "' Au - Loca - on Map l " Exhi bi tx - Site Util iiati on Map Exhi bi to '",'G�� - Phasing Plan Exhi ^big -hu "' - Detailed Site Plan Exhibi -4,onceptual Gradi ng Plan Ekhi bit' Pp ", - Conceptual, Landscaping Plan Exhi bi t 1 7t-;r -,..L revati ons Exhibi = '7ypical Pad Elevations Exhibit`' - Plaza Araa Exhibit d - Proposed Parcel Map Exhibit "K" - Lf° hti ng Plan r,. Exhi bi t "0 - Parcel Map Resoi uti on of Approval wi th Standard Condi ti ons ILI- 6 e o000000C T.V.P.C. TERRA VISTA NORTH CITY OF iTE'VI: 4 !' -0 RANCHO CUCAMONGA ----`� PL AWING WING D V1S (>,N EXHlfjrr-- SCAU. i NORTH CITY OF , r TEM a af� A F P�Nci o cucAV,0�T G A TITLE.ali ---- PLANNIING DrVMOLN F-XH1J3rr---Srk - Ef ull. 11-F .,aa, PART 11 UNIFORM APPLICATION m NOWRESIDERTIAL PROJECT SUMMARY DEVELOPMENT T TABLE Project Name Terra vista village Reference File No.: Location N.E. Corner Of Baseline Road anti (Staff Use Only) General Plan Haven Avenue Development District PROJECT AREA► Gross (incl. area to centerline of abutting streets): acres: 18.9± Net (exclusive of dedication for major external and secondary streets): acres: 15.3+ AREA DISTRIBUTION (Based on Net Area) ACRESISQ. FT. % OF NET AREA Building Coverage 136,740 s.f. 20.48 Landscape Coverage 135,�`Q}�.f. 20.28 Vehicb1ar Area!inci. parking): 335,000 ±s. f. 50.38 FLOOR AREA DISTRIBUTION BY PROPOSE U ^E (Based on Net Area) Area of Building Pad No. of Stories Gross Floor Area (sq. ft.) Proposed Use 24,650± t:.f. 1 37,400± s.f, 1 23,009 s.f. Drug Store 12,000±" s.f. 1 36,606 s.f. 10,000 s.f. Market Retail 36,37-'x' s,f.. 1 29,525 s.f. Retail 96,6.1 . 5.f. 1 37,600 s.f. Pad Bldgs. Proposed Restaurant &- Retail PALMING _ Type of Use Parking Ratio # of Spaces Required ff of Spaces Provide Retail 1/250 451 451 Restaurant 1 /100 200 200 Fast Food 1/75 53 53 Total No. of Parking Spaces Required: 704 Total No. of Parking Spaces Provided: M4 No. of Compact Spaces : 8_3 % of Compact Space to Total Space : 128 �r // ° `7 fill 32 as i tit I It I Ev a,` N. t -4" a 0 at F !q�9 I p ttf lu r —� h7 n - U n �n -• ------- ----- - - --^ -------- ------------------ --- ---'----------- - --- -- --- -- - - --- ,i IL ME x r ' 71 NORTH CITY C F ITEND RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISCXN EXHMrr= 1 -47 Wwr Li€iIHX XLSiAIQ D, MNIWM y do Am NI ti WWI ii 5 5 4 6 • I ^emu M•.u. N.1 F n �l i tz S tttttlllll 1 �,7�1 77b.:S.Y F"� I� p i _. _._.w�a'•�.,� _.fit 7t.r E e rt irk • (I It �� tl IA �SECT04 A wu.NU. ✓x go buat�� W.b 1 J .SECTION vu. A A- A . 49W ti - el -. -t✓,r men n¢ 1 .. yy -.yam IINI SE'CiION 4' �W.dNCiA IHG I ar«ar W.IW NORTH C rY OF ITENI= 1Pi RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE= n� PLANNING DIVISBAN EXHIB1'' SCALE= � •.,rte �' ;�° � /r. �',r�•��'iS r :••fir IraeeV uM+� GEM" 0 HAVEN AVE au.ar 4 `r 1 ' r ►Pk' J SEOTIOH , E. HAVEN WE t11 evam ryr .. L NORTH CITY OF T RANCHO C1 7 CAMOiiGA .s ITi.I PLANNI;l�G DI�✓1SIO,T EXHIBIT• 1. ! V. .,w,. - RIM at low '- �W��,%� -�f�11 . • ,. ��TF^ `If �! IL.�i ., j�, .., —�' ►'9 �rga��llerlR'•�Mi+rtr� af..n,,r. " P..�al' ars P':��r s}�rtiL iS =s� siatv`!•L•�}'i MARKET e lVr EL9VAMONS. rna. � t r t"Sop, WLDIMI 4 { >3HCP IlUlLOM04 KE7'pEYCNp 80- AT10Td l NORTH CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DVISIaN EXT-TTT rr.. SCAt �:� ✓' 4 A �•S A ed! i 0 E! UP Q 1 F: KI k �w tI!L 1R F 4 A Q I 1 -21 t�J y nq T o a O N, oir,( oz NORTH CITY CAF ITEM: RANCHO CUCAMONGA TrT PUNNING DIVISQN EXHmrr:- �.�1__SOLE:_ --�'" r m r Gal Em 0 Ell #-.2s Ell CL ul wi _�.,. _, _i �-�� r .; ��- 1 t l�; �Il, 1 �:Y. ��1 �-34� C\'s : i O x Bill MR; Wis' Pfill "llil 111,11 VLAU, SU- CL a pni O q f L-A NORTH CITY or, PLANNING DW}5 CXN EXH113rr_ _ CA I` X11 ^ RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSI(N APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86 -05 FOR A716.4 ACRE INTEGRATED SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND SAELINE ROAD ;M TrE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT OF THE TERRJ? "VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY HHEREAS, on the Ist day of August, 1986, a complete application was filed by Dicker- Warmington Properties for review of the above- described project; and u WHEREAS, on the 13t4,_ day of August, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a p, Aic hearing to consider the above- described project. €017 ows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the DeveTopment Lade, the Terra Vista Planned , Community Text, and the purposes of the district in which the;, site is located, in that A. The shopping center provides for office use retail -stores and service rstiblishments to meet the needs zf the compunity.; B. Site planning and building design provide for conveniez.Z accessibility for pedestrians and automobiles and promote maximum opportunity for transit usage. C. The site plan and architecture and landscape design promote open spaces and landscaping to create a visually pleasing environment. D. The proposed use promote social interaction and min mite adverse envirotvmental impacts and resource consumption. E. The shopping center exhibit the highest standards of site planning, ,architecture and landscape design. 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detriw;ntal to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materiO ly injurious to properties or improvements in the vicir;ty. `^ PLANNING COMISSIO14 RESOLUTION NO. CUP 86 -05 - 'DICKER- WRMINGiON August 13, 1986 Page 2 3. Ti,at the site is suitable and adequate for the proposed use and development. 4. That the proposed use will not have a substantial adverse economic effect on the nearby uses. 5. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Terra Vista Planned Community Text and the D evel opment Cade. SECTION 2: That this project with the mitigation measures will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negfti ve Declaration is issued on August 13, 1986. SECTION 3: That Conditional - Use Permit No. 86 -05 is approved subject to e o owing conditions: Planning Division: I. The planter area located at the east side of the front dri vektay on Base Line Road shall be widened to at least 10 feet and a pedestrian connection shall be added. 2. A pedestrian connection shall be added to the planter area located at the east side of the second driveway on Base Line Road. 3. Parking spaces in front of the ,major retail building and drug store shall be 6 iminated except for handicap spaces. 4. The continuous fifth lane along the site frontage on Base line Road to mitigation traffic conflicts meets the intent of the required average 43 feet for landscaping and buildi "ng setback. 5. Building pad F shall be oriented on the north side of south access with a single parking area provided west of the building. The final design shall be subject to City Planner and City Engineer review and approval prior to submitting for plan check. 6. A reciprocal parking enforcement clause subject to the Sheriff's Department approval shall be recorded with the Parcel Map. 7. All decorative walls shall be of compatible materials such as stucco or concrete with decorative caps. Detailed design of all decorative walls shall be included i n the detailed landscape and irrigation plans to be submitted for Planning Division review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 8. The proposed six satellite building pad areas are approved in concept only. Future development for each building pad shall be subject to Development /Design Review process for Planning Commission approval, Modifications to the shopping center shall be subject to Planning Ctmmission approval. 11q'�� PLANNING COMMISSION RESOL'UTIO'N N0. CUP 86 -05 DICKER- WARMINGTON August 13, 1986 Page 3 9. Ramps leading to the drug store, retail building, and the market store ; ,,hall be of textured treatment such as heavy brown finish concretE. 10. Texturizel pavements identifying pedestrian pathways shall be of non- slip Mexican tile, exposed aggregate, and colored heavy broom finish concrete,.- or a combination of them, subject to City' Planner approval. ,Full material samples shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.. 11. Detailed design of; the major plaza area between Buildings `C and D shall be designed to reinforce the community identity and emulate the approved theme park located at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Haven Avenue. Detailed design shall be included ?n the landscape and irrigation plans to be submitted for Planning Division review and approval prior to issuance of building permit. 12. Additional pedestrian oriented facilities such as hardscape, trash receptacles, raised benches for seating, kiosks, and attractive landscaping shall be provided to the plaza areas in front of the retail shop building 2, 3, and 4. Detailed designs shall be included in the landscape and irrigation plans to be submitted for Planning Divisi -on review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 13. A uniform design of hardscape such as trash receptacles, planters, benches, bicycle racks etc. for the entire shopping . center shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.- 14. Location and conceptual design of transit stops and shelters shall be subject to Design Review Committee review and approval. The design of the transit shelters shall be compatible to the architectural ;)rogram of this shopping center. 15. The design of the Uniform Sign Program shall compliment the approved architectural program. The Sign Program shall entablish a uniform size, placement and single color for tenants. Major tenants may have variation in size, placlement and color, provided that no more than 3 colors shall be permitted within the program, except for logos. 16. Berming and special landscaping treatments such as increased size and number of trees, increased size and number of shrubs alcng Valencia Avenue shill be provided for screening any buffering loading areas. 17. Cl usteri no cif tree plantings, planter pockets in front of concre*ce columns shall be provided along the entire store front area, in part:culsr Hughes Market, retain building, and Longs Drmg store. 18. Tree placement W thin plaza areas and along columnar shall provide wind mitigation. 141' ,31 ,. PLANNING COMMISSION 'RESOLUTInN or,. CUP 86 -05 - DECKER- WARMTH +afON August 13, 1986 ,< Page 4 r 19. The quantity of pi'LInt materials shown in the conceptual landscape are deficient. 'It shaii.' \be designed to meet the City standards in areas _ of number of street"trees, trees around building frontage, parking lot trees for shade, he��igerow for screening cars, etc.. I 20. All future building pans shall be seeded and irrigated for erosion control. Detailed plan shall be included in the landscape and irrigation Ek plans to be submitted for Planning Division approval prior ; to issuance of building permits. 21. The lighting fixture 'design shall compliment the architectural program. It shall inclVe the plaza area lighting fixtures, building lighting fixtures (exterior), anal- parking lot light %ng fixtures. 22. Henry wood rafters shall be added to the roof overhang. Detailed plans shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 23. The design of store fronts shall compliment the architectural progrrni and shall have subtle variations subject to design Review Committoe approval prior to issuance of building permits. 24. The following detailing and building materials shall be subjected to Design Review Committee review and approval. A. Texture pavement shall be of a non -slip Mexican ti l e. B. Concrete walkway within arcade sha: be of heavy broom finish with Mexican the and colored 'r throughout the site. C. Concrete columns shall be of intregal color. D. Stacking of roof tile at the edges shall be provided. Detail plans for the placement of the stacked roof to es and samples of roof tiles shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. E. The accent tile shall be of ceramic with design. F. The stucco finish sha ?l be of lumpy smooth type. 25. All roof screening shall be architecturally integra• „ed with the building design, and where possible, a roof parapet wall shall be used to screen roof- mounted equipment_ 26. A soil disturbance permit from San Bernardino Ccunty Agriculture Department shall be - equired prior to issuance of rough grading per it. F PLANNING CoviMiSSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 86 -05 - DICKER- WARMINGTON August 13, 1986 Page 5 `r 27. The developer, shall comply with Chapter 5 of the Uniform Building Code regarding property line clearance at the time of recordation of Parcel Map 9504, to the satisf;—tion of the building Official. Any changes to the approved building elevations including trellis and arcades, of required by Building Code, shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Engineering Division: 1. The striping plans for the project shall be submitted to and approved by the City Traffic Engineer prior to the issuance of building permits. u 2. Catch basins shall be constructed an the east side of Haven Avenue north of Valencia Avenue and shall be connected to th�- existing channel on the west side of Haven Avenue or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 3. A lot line adjustment to combine the `existing parcels within the site into one parcel or the related Parcel Map 9504 shall be recorded prior to the issuance of building permits, 4. Existing Overhead Utilities- a. Haven Avenue - The existing overhead utilities (electrical and tel ecomamunicati ons) on the project side of Haven Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole south of Bas: Line Road to the first pale north of Valencia Avenue prior to occupancy. Reimbursement from future development on the opposite (west) side of Haven AVenue is not possible, because the property is already developed. b. Base Line Road - The existing overhead utilities e ecommuni c51£ ons and electrical), except for the 66KV and larger electrical on the project side of the street shall be undergrounded from the first pole east of Valencia Avenue to the first pole west of Haven Avenue prior to occupancy. The developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of one -half of the established cost of undergrounding from future development as it occurs on t'ne opposite (south) side of the street. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY. Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Brad u p er, Deputy Secret ry �'' J PLANNdmN:t� r�IZ .R CUP B6 OS , . - QiK �Ait'r�I GTO.�. i August Page 6 I, Brad Buller, Qepuiy Sear Eta y of the Planning C'dmnissnon of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do .6ereby certify 'that, the for6gOng Resdl u''06n was duly and regularly i ntrn'r�'uced, Pa- t' d, -And adopted by the,, l anni ng G � ssi on of the Gity of Rancho Cucamonga, t.�a�a^egtllaar meet�'ig •f t g Planning Comni.s�s on held on the 13th day o'f'Aug4ti, 1986, by the fol l owi og vote -to -wit: AYES: CommiSSI "OWIFRS: } NOES: CONMISSION&a' ABSENT: COMMiS3fl;1R ii I �1 Z 'N s. U a s. U.. L-1 «acaLe '�yti Lw d ++emu os Y� q °cud L.�.�YCnLi qdL gLJQgC D9 ll�duu La �,� -�d Arp. LYq 3y dp. CS Ldob gg Oq� E+ b d d Y d i0 G g Y w u°nwM 20, C" z—."- 40�� mYp� coq CE GG`^d Ob ' JY C d.0 tb '^ V C a c N E V« O C y° b �^ ° o E�i}, bdLLO E, b° Y oz E bYO$wgs AL 0.CN�N CN ^4 O gLN�T Q a c q O.. N N 'N�C4. YmY yNj we dbq q = .-n m�O1E �oo.0 n z;rdr p1. �.Li 17� Gm aG UT Lyt U` G d q p L7 t r n mL Nor°. as to N L u . Sm C�a z++G ^o Yrd �d�VUL qi'"''1 n'CUN V ^ pfd ••O E d >u�i �oY ^iN _mu c �_ N� ^r+ a�a°iao.v s'i`.niT coca.=.. cN+N -.9151 -iop3 et-.c ni R. N 1. z O O L O Q � s zz� vii C: u wa f i 6 J r C o� 3 s o W C m C 4 6 N J b Lt o Tic 0 � bA O E v � p D n E dd� L L n iO � Y N J p ^r Sa S H z O v F J J D a O +E- 4 a «b..� m b1�+ •. c. m . LNw�+ °u uaho. C p u d Si L?h >d�y9� `qY -q0 ^r N t Y +e+ p bn °Emti �d �v nd L e cCiwoCaYc b„AON N 1`1 O Ip } GYy•9 PRnr y^ C >Ta��Oy� L=.Yd GrEE �Y� MK ^ER O. CY °�4° rV G�4_ CN.A.et wa d�v`nt J ^r ^L rn «yG Ad `• °orc A" a�yt. •. "•a ^q� u' -� t°4u .c o a'� dqa Ys N Yq'Y °YSx �a N .C. ^.a N�NUYO NL••� 4'OV Uya y 9 ^..q IOU°OAYRa Q »>'•z ?,,°�6° �u •-E. G.nm "'u Oa Y. p °� Oi r� 9 A.'} -} Lo 9� hL � VCAYa NaA+UvG. L » ?O�. .�+`EEV N4^ ^R {• `Rw N YU»R o•xn d Y L .o. � x c. °sY�4 L nLN1 «L Tz- 3 N^ o dN =u °OY Zt2 ma 5 w.�d ° sm � •.R C ^Y -V• i LCG -R ldi EY•^ N CMp C...GV x G «� Y ?G: 41 avY. w y C YG cE 3U y - 6` Y. �. Lm Rte: N. GayE �.a v 0 4 N4p« �ti YYaq L YGg G�4e L�i+NV� -�NN N ti YQ ��AU4^ L4M` A °y G^+^O U L [i!NU SN.�� 4 A N C Cam. }• E >� » W ^G++yO C4R Nevi 2� NqC q.y. ON A N u E Cw '.. O. 'D t *� 4 °V O• C r � VNty O CR Vy w. ..•ps V =YN u�.0 » Yy W� �'•, A. R° pu: sy TVS rq 4 ELIN R. ty -T�v Se E.c � Y oYyvy„ r.9c f•�O Y...o Y o `Y'6 ° ^•�• ur1YT3O YC•G».c. YU �...� x a «.q w ^eC�aY+Y c° o Y. •'v1a �� ^wa UC 12 ou xomF �o. y> CN na a.cu9ZN 4Cf..lwy Rc+o. R tail u G}' „".pa.� ^GE i••.z cu x° Lt'y YR »� OiG3L ;CR�pi Tprde.` d vy9UG 6 EwP+i O. C »v m•.• N.t+✓3ia�R FNUCa.• N 4V wN U��i ca•Eq c AC •-• LL qrO NLp ai Ey CCY» Ycli� oG ^�.a- tl�•a LNV L.`r IwCJ� � »G E.ug uw�V � mid a�u .G. L �cPyu ^ T �a c9 om � uiEx'T' p y,4 r'�Ya CNV' L EU =- �y V N y4 pa0 D.G Aa Rag SCE �.~ -'ED .~,•ice 4 < Y U ^ 6 G •^.. n Ra.N N NN NL N,. LC °» G,a„O NO °cea >aaw .. a aagv «a. L9 ^o v 4 do w °o �L, GLGE tL Y�yx Y�L�D4 +[ 4 L N t ®t F a • I C v °< 4m iA a°+" z3G�= X404 a cR rr Z L IL T Ny 40. d 'G'. R y i d ERE u o • O tL `K c C u?CG Rr. D4A Nq° L LtR Y� 9EG m EN. uy vuq 5mti M •°y a+`L•N �y `Rw N YU»R Lw VoN cE° aZS ° RYUUH. du.'^'N N^ LL'.G NF yFN .• la0. i m C 491 J.T. q N VISA y9 G ✓ � ° ,AMY m � 9 U Uir ~O y C YG cE 3U y - 6` Y. �. Lm Rte: N. GayE dn-V Lw G{T. v y4,G9 E i^ N3r„ Lpc wLi•�1- � «U3�, bu R yONyy uOU y A� L g L Q .U. ERN � i q . b • EY4 A C C �9 ea+YVG. R L$y..i+'. G .G C..yiw� dC a1 ¢ A Q r n w N p H t n G 6^ N S N a q < U J V 6 N i ai Ey CCY» Ycli� oG ^�.a- tl�•a LNV L.`r IwCJ� � »G E.ug uw�V � mid a�u .G. L �cPyu ^ T �a c9 om � uiEx'T' p y,4 r'�Ya CNV' L EU =- �y V N y4 pa0 D.G Aa Rag SCE �.~ -'ED .~,•ice 4 < Y U ^ 6 G •^.. n Ra.N N NN NL N,. LC °» G,a„O NO °cea >aaw .. a aagv «a. L9 ^o v 4 do w °o �L, GLGE tL Y�yx Y�L�D4 +[ 4 L N t ®t F a • I C •"- w• q � N Y r 0 Q N n � y^i Y r 3 .+ C• M. y "• C F O G C q <^ C _Y ^' �° .+ i G d R �N~ L.p.C� OR N.+ a C NL?CQ O.II gCti KL O. =MQ u F ..~L+ y YaLZ n G.. Y� NC.p -6 N P^ 6Y dD CW dS.R'dMA .- ��•.LO• a OuM~ t d 1 Nd•0• yM Nc m �YL VC9a C Y O yR �VR4 YY a ✓ry YM� OL .• yO' A •rO• ^ n F� y PV rV Cr Q Lo N. btM diM L j P4 A G py .- G V- • LAG 4MN.0 D �� VU n y� L3y° "~ u Ye�pr — 4a°+On R taj �¢ZI LO,x g2so"n rN� VvY-Mi L NM nQ L i.L. fGFMd 3r TY^� bQd�C�. n LNNN M �O n^ 9L w10 Np Ldd? nU� O.Cy V l v W 9 v rt m v v n n~ uY �.. ..�. L u••..,• d MN u zn • Qt.'- L;b.. odgb oLUU.. .dove QC =' Y- 00 w. c..-. GAnJ .°u.Cfl.N ^aV r aY =FL ~u L y S 6^faN w be 9 L Qh +.�C4 �� C N90p '•M � 1r 60 9 rL NnL J rytY n=i N 7 OM ��ss d N�� �+- F L.°" V L. ` n -• s, ° L. O q U M Q U E C F n 9 4 V w d y L N .G w. O `C1> rxu m4;-L QMNO QgY•t0 �KYIN h6N qCl 69 h' A KGG � dN61aJ wA.QMNµW D n �f G W AOq` �O p Oc� �qa°a� ° Sp0 r L A prY q f C O L••e wa d�4 T =. LO NLr�640 'O > (Rr Boa Elad ya y'Mpd C N `y y D cN OO DDn V^ Y � TL4 m3L C .�i •6 i OMC O Tc OMt�iy E �* `� .y y YM n NuO qt Np y« ° a°s�4 r O .'. a L >rG. UU L r wl q M L.M.. C� d , .. C✓ <CC.. d Y M L.M A L d D N U S C L N � N� N = N. � Q � d T � °° M N M 9 L � N L 4 L~ �• pLO • r C ti Y`Nµ VFA U N.uL1 ¢N oC °i V N a YO 2yOdY iCVI y1 "' 7 + L d�U�V NV O' O/J NN .GOY dC~ �L Ay�a Nw°i •Q a1uQi NSK aL y'NC yay ICY �„ 4N C NV� y CC! L C 'U C M MaO+'M ti �YC� Lt � hQ A«O Mp Y ~L P.O. Ua1°'y a�Cn ELw uP�_ LO y R2 +�M �M.MM w� LO Lam. ON1gL Fy `O h CwU GdO VdM ��^- GN M12a• y0 aNN'a VV�Wtd..pON¢'IyN �R..•M q.a �L'iy NZ t`N!•F u Z ,!5 b wi�J'o �N„N Z imrms � _ �oy �M �crn wVClwy r YY �N �O 6W4 < E Nei R� ^NM V•.'UO�auc 0•y O���G1 9•p- b0 e'o.L+ � iNinY =d EK4 EM ajM dLh +LO • Up.Ng6.aL.v cg•. u n r.,F 7V4 C r7 2 4M �V ¢d•'La. V; 4Z 9N CNr CM '+S MD }.NL CN Urn-gY gwT 6P •Ci OR <V ?40: aN •"- w• q � N Y r 0 Q N n � y^i Y r 3 .+ C• M. y "• C F O G C q <^ C _Y ^' �° .+ i G d R �N~ L.p.C� OR N.+ a C NL?CQ O.II gCti KL O. =MQ u F ..~L+ y YaLZ n G.. Y� NC.p -6 N P^ 6Y dD CW dS.R'dMA .- ��•.LO• a OuM~ t d 1 Nd•0• yM Nc m �YL VC9a C Y O yR �VR4 YY a ✓ry YM� OL .• yO' A •rO• ^ n F� y PV rV Cr Q Lo N. btM diM L j P4 A G py .- G V- • LAG 4MN.0 D �� VU n y� L3y° "~ u Ye�pr — 4a°+On R taj �¢ZI LO,x g2so"n rN� VvY-Mi L NM nQ L i.L. fGFMd 3r TY^� bQd�C�. n LNNN M �O n^ 9L w10 Np Ldd? nU� O.Cy V l v W 9 v rt m v v n n~ uY �.. ..�. L u••..,• d MN u zn • Qt.'- L;b.. odgb oLUU.. .dove QC =' Y- 00 w. c..-. GAnJ .°u.Cfl.N ^aV r aY =FL ~u L y S 6^faN w be 9 L Qh +.�C4 �� C N90p '•M � 1r 60 9 rL NnL J rytY n=i N 7 OM ��ss d N�� �+- F L.°" V L. ` n -• s, ° L. O q U M Q U E C F n 9 4 V w d y L N .G w. O `C1> rxu m4;-L QMNO QgY•t0 �KYIN h6N qCl 69 h' A KGG � dN61aJ wA.QMNµW D n �f G W O Z 4J U •n L C C2 4 C t`ZU� 2 v E�y Ly L�O1y� O.ML >•� r m. g9` .`cag °�a� M Y� Iz " u N �.'G Y � 6 9Y...'g• 6 a4 51 v I's N moo, N G Gp L « gU .N m A� �qC^ 77; A Ci L YC O E Y n. E N E rO 6OwP n6u< �mL Y 6 >_m t°. .2 a« L f o94 �66M 2nz fOw S� Cm° q�4g4 °std UO. p..S Vr °avgo`o wG.p u. V'GNR Ea: g y ti6u w ` `Y YCF^Y 4r ygfil co °O.� g O m? 9^ Y C. N�1ti^ •N YN � •U'^ wfo ° onL �.e yq`fQY Y y. N L q N^ z= u °�c N Yggp, Y, ETA @Cl6 3 q C. "o o U � ✓ti �a -.97% �o.Lf ama"mm TZ _ ^ t v -w L � .-. O U Li Y r Yn- Uy p.S Yy p 4rP �...m rfi =µOq Mqy �.q y L•�^ G Y va Y4vf ..L ^. 1�U1Y V O 0.� }.:'4.N 0.•.• q. L....1 M N 0. Y.a Yf S •y t�Io ZL . W5 bLL V YL' N H 'SAC a Ea: UT G °u Of •°- Y�ueO1 o Y q y� C •� C 6 Y Y Y LN �q Of 4 w oe 72 r -2. -5 o" ^ a at = r�0 O� qG^ YN2. � L Nq il t 6 q C^ e.oYO� ,., c nr -n N.°„�Ae a� FdL ° r n a N L q N^ z= u °�c N Yggp, Y, ETA @Cl6 3 q C. "o o U � ✓ti �a -.97% Yq aN FC6 =;= sim. icn« ou °N� 0. Ic l 11 9 q G aLa V Y l r0. q Y Y LN �q Of u r F. LO y1 tr 9E€ M _N .• L k s r 6 EyLr T � O G d 6 _° � O Y « n'O a-rL N L q N^ z= u YdY Yggp, Y, Y �f O r OE u WR M. a1. fE j¢ L i Y O mYru t9 Ic l 11 dY. occaoN .rn .L o o c.•.c n� � A ^ o O tM q V UO • Y u Y d >ri. p c qq w � ooF N oc L'LV ono a+a QJ iq OM LS iq R4 py_ I YOr'n n C -O G�� _ >y �u•wT E � ♦i O L L N .:U L° L�.c C3- 4y • p.�O�b.,. ��C F8 Y N � y E E� yam= y, 0� IV I Of Y � 1 q�T C Y �y C E W E.. E 1 n •L ` EI p.l. =Y O•VIV YU� i..f /��. V ,p UM .•yYY av �/`y'I OA ^ � 'Ja,^+�q t`u . a A L2 E � od ° p� ... S.2 .DE No nOt q ^ gypp Np Y E.6r .9 O y e II N L 6 Z duo Y. Np p Y �OUYd OI rJ O .p V 3C� ^� l I G N LT a•^ ° 1L ,y L A LG. y E SU � Y O• V Div 4:a. p t C 6 4 Y« .J W a �I9,1 W� J iIz � aZ . a«y - V. 1 -u o U gg CL .^. ^L p g Z C F -'% 4N9�^`p uW C yniu.4 me ^ Yuu ^ i m S. y �GN nt G Y$'^ y L C Y°' qY °' pa t• R 2 ^Ta� _ i amp dct'q N p ,�.. L.a -,Z �. is < pY�n w dr.r oTCC U Y pE Uq O qC V E uu er5�� 'U YfO� frdj �q + u ^a o� aqa i annp Top ` eFy d'°o X9%-5 `.,ipr Z o O E C a = uo �a �3 qu L EOE.d ; b VC00�^ p0. .1Yiy Z pNp d..E.. y �. A9�� ^. er U.,•� N�Lq V yE dE �m v L. ay YN yO� Wd +"L � ° LZ 4. jam 60 • p� r•� Yd�u L q Ny NL 60LLN. as j Yat' c c ay." ta' ;•, 7s q« ;mu C.s �6A Y7 Y a.-4 .N. N.Yi;a...p NOCp CaY �p off.. �•'' L a Y` u ea cEiZAvi r ��� �E Ur upiN 7 .0Y ♦R A NV9.u1 +- 6VAG 00.. E ^L WNa WYtO HE INp t) N N y a L A v O o C US v. A Nu 03Y.' A Yo O. U .E cl Awc Y V L� -�-:- 9 a C Y.. r dC. N W N.� O N •� L w M �- n0 ci 4N TL E u LgNOC - U Y d dAdY ua ^ � K E • � K x. YNU ° d we y .-. 3 >f to 3 L� xd ro rn y TEE Gy n u Vat �j ST E q • _ N y.M Ny d GT d..2= 60.0 cGtOiC T9. 4 Eve CM C1C i61 yCN GL V^ NZ Cb NL v +. ^ �q q T ' ucJ G U'tL O� � C ♦ LQTm N air ~ � ctai� � �� .7 V C r u L CN i w m Y V o.. O L P •.. M D+ ac y AOv a ^_ L go U E L U � No�.. cqy °• � .•�Y.•� mn � Y O a�.d1c °c L C n.°r °m .'-- Y M .0 nq. ai L '_' ° a _ °u w -b .e Y c aQ cc: c x,,L, ° Y Ey � L 3 rdia pd 9N CEO OEE ¢'C u tl L � A sue+ L L^tl N..• W cp � tl.J O.�°a � V Y = i" 4-5 yam �° N`q.. ur a> vW 3ix N NAL °mot xd .c- C S n •°- N6W m� GLLw YY N° tn'q ^� am LY.0 6J 6� W�NL its Sp C°aj Q W `\ 1� K c1 •U-1 0 .�i � •V � of t(1 N N y a L A v O o C US v. A U -gad- Y.tl ;Ot .0 Y G w C 9 8-6.;2: �- n0 ci 4N TL E c9Wi c cT, w c n� E r o ♦�' �" v A c rn T9. il Eve CM Sn KGL W3 ° VbA.wCG GL V^ 4 a -• 'w d:t n � _ � c � h• Q � L yO �u 'iii M w L nNa 6 L p4p C q, 2 pu x u CrC y' °€L� C dam. aq� •` i•pW •yV L c a N q$m° Gr N G y Y p• L A C E i nit w� Is O C!^ nus °«o L. p ^_ L �N 0 Via} i rp xou c � L Iwo c� J �'O V" C dy Oq �c r� O Y d F YO. d „ T v r u O. C s M Y O Y a q L Y C C T wL u? E Y C O Y L d 6y. .Ji ti 1 w G+ C.M dD L d p Aa d q E E r Z " •-�' a N ^w AOU E a r b A " •. •�j "^ N d. to �u i oa Y au z .. iu. O z� p N� G d y N O r a O 99 ac�i w and .Lc N p= er N C LAN F'N' y Lr Y L Ui 7 O' W A C A O tta 5 14 �f `A � I S N J Y D C S, J L+N+ lu da EE E d 6 u A ^ y • q ^. L a,y o d nth `p r u .- c o Qu �w a c • aZ ao�' u7z O N� avu °a d d L L9 U L C V o n 112 d u a.Y �qy C so V a' c •- O N r up L LL L ti< Y L dri N y^ y r Od W ,Ap L d T ^ O�.r c2 '• U da d nI u F•V �+ doL poo A f <6N 6N. JS.O O dd o IN+T+2o d d �+ { h+r+ C!^ nus °«o L. p ^_ L �N 0 Via} i rp xou c � L Iwo c� J �'O V" C dy Oq �c r� O Y d F YO. d „ T v r u O. C s M Y O Y a q L Y C C T wL u? E Y C O Y L d 6y. .Ji ti 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA C,)�CA sso � DATE; August 13, 1586 � > 1877 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Conmission PROM Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIROMMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PAP,CEL MAP 10007 - SUPRACOTE, NC." -; A divisjon acres '', and into 2, parce s min the General Industrial Area (Subarea No, 8) located on the northsi de of Arrow Highway, east 9S maple Auenuc. (( Apn: 208 - 35112 I. PROJECT tO SITE DESCRIPTION: A, Actioci Re uestq& - Approval of Parcel Map E, Purpose: To separate the property coptaining an existing T nCUsMai beolding from the vacant partit-n of the property, C. Location: Horth side of Arrow Highway, eafz of Maple Avenue, D. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 6.5 acres Parcel 2 9.4 acr. Total " 15.9 acres E. Existing Zoning. General Indus..riai, Subarea No. 8 of the In us Ra pec'iTic plan. F. Existing Land Use -, j Parcel I - Existing Ircu:trial Building (Supracote, + Inc.) Parcel 2 Vacant Surrounding Land Use: North - Existing Industrial Building South - Vacant East - Vacant West - Vacant ITEM I 1301981 5 3 , �WI T - , �U9 i ,...,,,r� -.- •» rte+- --�--� � _ {� ,.t PAS 10007 Page 2 y a, Ji {. K. Surrounding Ger,Qral Plan and ,Development Co ans; North - General I^zdu t i s 1 tSubarea W South - Minimum Impact Neavy,Industr`isal (Suba�aa 9) east g" - GeneralwSndus�i -al (Sub as 8 } West - Industrial Park (Subarea 7) 1/ I.. Site Lharacter$sti . The undeveloped westerl , portion of the pro a t is an,a an on id ° vineyard.. The eastern portion ;(parcel 2) improved _40:,'squaro vs Vrth 713 foot- Ind6�trial b4�j -I ding. The ; site s$opes fkm naRR to tduth at aioproxi`jlately A. II. ANALYSM, This Paroeli tap wi f l 444de 15.9 acrf,4 into 2 parcels crea ' ,t n a se agate g r g P parcel` for an exi tin Irc�u'trial building (Supracotrz Inc.) and a vacant parcel' to be'° used for future industrial development. All street improvements fronting- Parcel 2 are existing. The missing improvements fronting .;Parcel I are required to be constructed upon development of Parcel 1: r ' Utility Undergro ding: There are; ,no existing overheaa utilities " aca e a proa.ect frntage; 1 however, lines do exist on the opposite (South) side of Arrow lj1ghway. It is recommended that an. in -lieu fee equivalent .to one -Half the estabYished cost of undergroundipgrje paid. r III. ENVIRONN+ENTAL REVIEW; Also .attached for ��ur review and consi era Son 7s"Pa`_rV1 of the Initial Stmdy.a, "completed by the applicant, : Staff has completed Part I1 of thf Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Upon completion and review of the Initial Study and field investigation, Staff found no adverse impacts on the env r.onm6nt as a result of the proposed subdivision. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Nearing have been sent 0. surroun�di9 property owenrs and placed in the Daily :,Report Newspaper, Posting at the site ha;;also been completed. PLANNING COOMiISSrottvS, Ai; RE0o T August 13, 19$6 PM IDOW ; Page 3 r V. RECOMMENpATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider-UT Input and elements of Tentative Parcel Map 100o7_ If-- after such consideration, i�ie a , Commission can reomrner7d approval, then the adoptiga of the :'r�ttached Resolution and issuance of a x Negative Declaration would b'` appropriate. Respectfully submitted, Barrye Hanson *� Senior Civil Engineer BH:BK:dak Attachments: Vcinity Map, p Tentative: Map Resol utta�:)r# RecomniefXid Conditions of Approval Initial Study 1 to - Y i NVIROiri'I�.�EN AL -R-E'VI - "� APPLICATION � I ^rr IJ77 Z vL R > I T ; ►�` D ]PART I GENERAL - 'For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be ca?pleted and submitted to the•Development Review Committee through the departmen,,;where the project applicatibr is made, 41pon receipt of this application, the Planning Division ,toff All prepare part II of the Initial'Study and make recommendations to Planning' Commission, The Planning. <Commission will make one of three determinations: (1) The project Will have no .signifitcant environmental impact and a Negative "Declaration will be filed, (2) The project will have a significatt,anvirotimental impact and an Eavirouman al Imp,a;;t Report will b� prepared, or (3) An° additional information report should be supplied F pplied Gy the applicant ;;wing further infar- ma�fiian concerning the proposed project. Date Filed: xAYIA4,il1936 Project Title• Tentative - Parcel. Map No. 10007 Applicant's Name, Address, Telephone s „tirarbrp,�. ` t 11200 Armco HigtIwAyr Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 (714) 9674711 Name, Address, telephone of Person To Be Contacted �~ 6 Concerning his Project. ti g d - 7rii} -3 ,_H. Audi ^moron 11 �n_O�So_Mt. Vernon Ave Ste. "H,:, Colton, C- li£ornia 92324 (714) 825 -1082 Location if Project 34200 Arrow Highway Ap2rox. 200'East of Maple Place on North side of Arrow Highway, Assessor's Parcel No.: 208 - 961 -012 - L >ist other perisit; necessary from: local, regional, state and federal agencies and the agency issuing such permits NjA AC Sr1 .SI LS J • Yl 2 1', 1 C:[Y 0. 1 ?F2tui1'} CUCAl,10Ef?;A ``7-�' CINGINC RING 0i'l1SIM E PROJECT DESCRIPTION Proposed use or proposed project: Subdivide property to_disnose -of excess acreage. Acreage of project area and square footage of existing and proposed 6.uildings, if any: _-.otai arrna &F in�tttd�d is 15-9 acres Anurox.,.square footage of existing building Is 113,740 $.F-: No buldings. are proposed. Describe the environmental Bettina of the project site including information on topography, soil stability, plants (trees), land animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, land use of surrounding properties, and the description of any existing strrtctures and their use (attach necessary sheets): The undeveloped waster l' half of site is an abandoned grape vineyard that slopes from north to south at approximately. 2%. The east er y au o the site is improved with a 113,740 S;F, metal building. -w ere t e coating of steel coils is done: This area has paved parking an storage areas. s enced around perimeter and has a railroad spur entering the north side of buildiing. Property to the west, south and east is vacant. Property to the Wort. :,y -an existing Industrial Park. The soils an site are a non- expansive silty sand overlying sand'snd gravel.' No animals were noted on site or the influence of any cultural, historical or scenic features of significance.. Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series .,of cumulative actions, which although incividuaily small, may as a whole have sigrificant environmental impact NO i -� WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO �' `11' I i . Create a substantial chap a in round t 7. Estimate the amount of sewage and solid waste materials s project w' will generate daily: S. Estimate the number of auto and truck trips generated daily by this project. 9. Estimate the amoulit of grading (cutting and filling)- requited for this project, in cubic yards:__ pie 10. I-V the project involves the construction of residential ulits, conipleti= the form on the next page. CERTIE=ICATIOH: 1 hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exh bits present the data and information required for this initial evaluatior to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belie-J. I further understand that additional information may be required to be sunmitted before an adequate evaluation c _ h� made by the P3annin Division. c— '�'f _ _ g Da tQ • Signature Title PROJECT HMAGER a" 3 1 3 g 9 con ours. X 2, Create a substantial change in existing noise of produce vibration or glare? X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? X 4. Create changes in the existing Zoning G., General Plan designations? X 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? X i b. Create the need for a #se or disposal of potentially hazardous materials ,uch as toxic substances, flammables'or explosives? X Explanation of any YES answers above (atiach additional sheets if necessary)„ 7. Estimate the amount of sewage and solid waste materials s project w' will generate daily: S. Estimate the number of auto and truck trips generated daily by this project. 9. Estimate the amoulit of grading (cutting and filling)- requited for this project, in cubic yards:__ pie 10. I-V the project involves the construction of residential ulits, conipleti= the form on the next page. CERTIE=ICATIOH: 1 hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exh bits present the data and information required for this initial evaluatior to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belie-J. I further understand that additional information may be required to be sunmitted before an adequate evaluation c _ h� made by the P3annin Division. c— '�'f _ _ g Da tQ • Signature Title PROJECT HMAGER a" 3 1 3 ` RESIDERNTIALL CO __. � at! The following W6�mation should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid the school district in a3sessing their ability to accommodate the Proposed residential development. oe�,-elopers are required to secure letters from the school district for dccommod ng h increa3ed number of students prior to issuance of ~~''°�gp=='^s^ / Name of and Tentative Tract Mo. Specific Location of Prgjeut ` " ] ' ��SK -1 B-1�E2 ��SE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL 1. Number of single family units: 2. Number of multiple '^ family units: 3° Date proposed to begin construction: ` 4, Earliest date of ' occupancy: Model# \` and #mf Tentative q. / ' .~+_/ y r � CITY OF RAN ICHO CUCC .MONGA' ENGTiMHUNG DMSS ION PARCEL MAP 10307 VICINITY MAP e ' "'A . �t { E I i I Ell E o o � z glgpa , a i ° $ Oil a � � c �.» 3ggu Qa• � iaZ II.� II•�S w I t � ��� ,, td�C��C36 $ $34 r.�• Jz cc 3 ) I tip r Q e u C�j i :tai!' \ r • C < � r 7. ( �1 x' I i .I RESOLo 0.40N P; ?. A, RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE 91TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALINRNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING u TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 10007 4jHCREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Nusiber 10007, submitted by Supracot, Inc., applicant, for the purpos ^. of subdi yi di ng into 2 parcels, the real property situated in the City of'Aancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, identi -O ed as AFN(s) 208- 35:1 -i2, locaF:ed on the nortSi side of Arrow Route, east of Marie Place; and WHEREAS, on August '13, 1986, the Planning Commission held a dui advertised public hearing for the above - described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISZ RESOLVED -AS_,_ _ FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. Thar the map is consistent with.the General Plan. 2. That `he improvement of the proposed subdivision 7s`, consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision am- improvements will note' cause substantial environmental damage, public healtie problems or have adverse affects on abutting property, SECTION 2: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 10007 is hereby approved subject o—fiie -attached Standard Conditions and the following Special Conditions: 1. An in-lieu fre equivalent to one -half the estabi i shed c.,Jst cif undergroundistg the existing overhear! utilities (electrical and telecommunications) located on the south side of Arrow Highway. ^hall be paid as follows: a. Parcel 1 - (450' of frontage) pay prior to the issuance of building permits. b. Parcel 2 - (660' of frontage) pay prior tc approval of the Final Map. �l "14D FLIN 001[. R I LUTION f AugdSt ! Parcel Map, jeoo7, Page 2 7 APPROVED AND ADMTED THIS 13% SAY. OF AUQUST, 1986. _. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO UC*10NGA 1 BY: ev,,ni s L. StUut, airman ATTEST: — Grad Buller,'Deputy ecre ary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Sedretary of the Planning Cermxission of the City of 1 Rancho Cucamonga, do,hereD' certify that the foregoing Resolgtion was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the PlzU'Aing Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Running Commission held on the 13ta day of August, 1986, by the following ,irate -to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: SOMNISSIONERS: c } E r S u° °a KI a u LL 0 O N Z a J •� � u O u ry ae � D 1K-• H N N LJ 2= 41 1. NZ E Lr �. n'�• c td.a4 = i► C bj • y � g p b � u y y t v i 6L ff 2+ � �' •+ C � w A rN �•.. '�J.a. d a+ q N Y... V to T ° 6 L C P r cry A w p C y r °O om d 4 3 L 6 aE .L,c Lu S.N a9a _a c$ r. ^ V � firy •. d uQ N3,G � C y E L L dt y v, Gp {{ v�N+' `t y ^a T s LM cEH �y A a a �• c E CC dA ° °T V d N a Y A zz Taal C-LlV is N aY L.y �AwN WU. ° L°i 'U^ 4 d CW Cd10 L9 gAyd •O,r,° v' 'L vv� L Nggwg+ Gi G }N 6 W.OA } ^ p 01 uaG.T d.C6L Nl LCC Qnp L Y.c gg'�. G�. U�Ua� C li dat.d �6 . NLL1 NVitNlB 3 7a Y� KC2 r m o V •t to ` - tT� �� � X I i► C bj • y � g p b � u y y t v i L W L t a L L Y O � M N � d� u T L �q n E q V L C d ° 6 L C P r � r N V L C A L A w p C y r y. dO om d 4 ?t L 6 aE ,yva t} = N d Yv^ St: S.N r� S ^ ` ^ V � firy •. d uQ N3,G � C y E 67 = y v, v�N+' `t y =o T s LM cEH �y ba ti E v � EE CC dA ° L°i 'U^ Na NN N M i y Oa ° O. N�.t. gAyd •O,r,° piE • .G-n� ON r. ^OIA �?� v Y. [Tw °t i �C ui LA �°. LM9 yv� y Y Ui1tyN L S dC •°` ` - tT� �� � X OM UU C ^ N 1+1 r ^ lAi 4� tp t� r „• N • uA bEa L �O' 16 g q.. N C u Y' �° rG �c� qu N 6y L L A $ G as gcq °Lac a Y L v L� >wy a E ^« G Na ApY nTi � LLL y ^O 1 � N _ 1, La L ra .°.4> ✓D N� rV �` ± AL t`p nY ^y 94 M PC wY bony O NL CL ' Y� MY ^ nW L O Y+��. Yu� Lu yt• V6 NM Y Lb LL T i. YW YO p b yN 9 Y CA qN ,gE VOA L� Yom' Yd E.r �� �� Y LO {) CY NM .0. N U L N O. �LL Y A46 �LLLL�" C. A„' V L• 6N ^Y O� tL Yd A 4 N 4 D 4 G A A L O O N Cr.. u 6 Y o <NO 6 }V FS1 lu IE — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIVIONGA STAFF REPORT CEO G�tG�Afp,t, FII !Z I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of Development District Amendment and issuance at a Negative Declaration. B. Purpose: To facilitate the development of a multi - family residential complex. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: or - vacant, designatedmedium Residential (8 -14 du /ac); Foothill Freeway Corridor, designated`Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac). South - Existi -ng single family subdivision, designated Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac); small lot subdivision to the southeast, designated Low-Medium Residential (4 -8 dulac). East - Existing neighborhood shopping center, designated Neighborhood Commercial. West - Single family residence, vacant land, designated Madium Residential (8 -14 du /ac). 0. General Plan Designations: Project Site - e Tum Residential (8 -14 du /ac). North - Medium Residential (8 -14 du /ac), Foothill Freeway Corridor. South - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac), Medium Residential (8 -14 du /ac) to the southeast. East - Neighborhood Commercial. West Medium Residential (8 -14 du /ac). ITEM J U LL �� !f> DATL: Aujust 13, 3X36 1977 T0: Chairman ar, d Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Howard Fields, ,ssistant Planner r SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT - f►ELi�NT "' - A aeve oT pment t 1Ti's ri c en en rom i Fe ro essl onal to Loa- Medium Pesidential (4 -8 du /ac) for 3.67 acres of land, located at the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 19th Street - APN 202 - 1091 -21. Related File: Tentative Tract 13353 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of Development District Amendment and issuance at a Negative Declaration. B. Purpose: To facilitate the development of a multi - family residential complex. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: or - vacant, designatedmedium Residential (8 -14 du /ac); Foothill Freeway Corridor, designated`Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac). South - Existi -ng single family subdivision, designated Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac); small lot subdivision to the southeast, designated Low-Medium Residential (4 -8 dulac). East - Existing neighborhood shopping center, designated Neighborhood Commercial. West - Single family residence, vacant land, designated Madium Residential (8 -14 du /ac). 0. General Plan Designations: Project Site - e Tum Residential (8 -14 du /ac). North - Medium Residential (8 -14 du /ac), Foothill Freeway Corridor. South - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac), Medium Residential (8 -14 du /ac) to the southeast. East - Neighborhood Commercial. West Medium Residential (8 -14 du /ac). ITEM J B. Environmental Assessment: As a result of the Initial Study,- Vie projec� will not present any significant impacts on the environment, however, there will be impacts from future residential development that could be mitigated basQd on the following applicable mitigation measures: Impact: The project result in future residential development anff will increase surface run -off due to the impervious surfaces (i.e., buildings, sidewalk, parking courts). Mitigatiuc,; All drainage from subject site will be conveyed to rc 7t�iiS-5ld`Avenue and 19th Street � 'ld will be under the supervision of the City Engineer. Impact: The development of the proposed designation will "iiTceTy change the traffic pattern which would become more cone- ntrated during peak morning and evening commute hours. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 86 -01 - BROCK DEVELOPMENT August 13, 1986 Page 2 {{ 1� r E. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant with a slope of o approximate y 3r=xisting vegetation consists of low growing grasses and weeds. There are no known cultural o; historical values attri btated to this site. '�. II. BACKGROUND: On November 6, 1985, during their regularly scheduled public he aring, 'she City Council reviewed and approved General Plan Amendment 85 -04G), a request to the General amend Plan Land Use Map from Office /Professional to Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac) on 3.67 ` acres of land. The is the site southern portion of a lepai parcel of record consisting of a total, of 6.83 acres. The northern P' oorti on contains 3.16 acres and is designated Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac) by the General Plan and Development Distict's Map. III. ANALYSIS: A. General'; During the Council deliberations on General Plan mmeendime t: 86 -07G, the Council determineJ that the subject site of 3.67 acres should be designated for; only one land use and ` developed as one development in conj uni �ti on with the northern 3.16 acre portion to provide adequata land area for site ameni`iies and mitigate potential freeway noise. However, the Council expressed concern over density vathin the project site, particularly tranui ti on of density along 19th Street. The Low - E` Mledium Residential land use designation would provide adequate transition buffers to existing single family subdivisions to the south. Additionally, this Amendment would bring the subject site district designation into conformance consistent with the adopted General Plan's Land Use Designation of Medium Residential. B. Environmental Assessment: As a result of the Initial Study,- Vie projec� will not present any significant impacts on the environment, however, there will be impacts from future residential development that could be mitigated basQd on the following applicable mitigation measures: Impact: The project result in future residential development anff will increase surface run -off due to the impervious surfaces (i.e., buildings, sidewalk, parking courts). Mitigatiuc,; All drainage from subject site will be conveyed to rc 7t�iiS-5ld`Avenue and 19th Street � 'ld will be under the supervision of the City Engineer. Impact: The development of the proposed designation will "iiTceTy change the traffic pattern which would become more cone- ntrated during peak morning and evening commute hours. 0 PLANNING.CO168SION,StAFF RE,�ORT DEVELbPNENT DISTRI-q AiiNDME4T 86-01 BROCK DEVELOPMENT August 13, 1986 Page 3 Mi ti 5a ti on: The overall street pattern would need additional TF-attic turn lanes on both Archibald Avenue and 19th Street. Impact: The project area is in close proximity to the proposied T Foofffill Freeway (�vte 30). Noise sources from, the future h site and Foothill Freeway will produce unacceptable levels o within dwelling units. Mitigation: Require a final acouctical- analysis show ng how noisg standards of 65 CNEL (extwior) ;tnd 45 CJ�L (interior) can be achieved for dwelling units located within 400 feet of the proposed freeway corridor. MiVigation medsures would include such,items as: sound attenuation walls and dense landscaping. IV. FACTS FOR - FINDINGS: The st tject property is suitable for the proposed"Tana use in access, size, and compatibility with the existing land uses id the surrounding areas. Further, the proposed district change will not have,a significant impact on the environment or surrounding properties ar�-'',Is in substantial conformance with the General Plan. V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item -has been advertised as a public hearing in The Daily Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. VI. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission apDrove the Uistrict Amendment through adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration.� R ctfully itte City Planner BB:HF:ko Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Map Resolution of Approval TJ_ 3 W r VL rT ill f OS.' �, , FC I iiRw.� �1J . {, V I LM® �, - � . t�� ' . ..' � E t s .��"��'`�. %Sky�•f #3�i� \a r r:K3?x� }�;•:• J. M PA y s !Vi H m a d -, (tit r` : j qW .I lYn9' srresY t ! — m - ps LM m i /ff OP MH —` gym ❑OOC LM ft oP'' OP NC NC OP p i�ORTH C F RANCHO CUCAMOiNGA TITtl:�T�,y Pt ��yitit� \G pIVLS ,7�i EXH113m �- SGAts: O i/T 4 FV r1AL FmRmi A VACANT) L tow � 2-4 J QEu. /9 M. VACANT �� Gr41V7-s): r ave 1�5�pleN77AL Ao ae� lal5 : L .HOUR COMMERCIAL i sreEEr Nr rZES /n NnrV- .40W �EI7tiJ�Y1 NORTH CIS or T ITEIM. RANCHO CLLAMOI GA TITLE: PLANNING DngsFON -r- E`CHlBi'I: ,• o, - --- SGtL.E. (�A tROaosEO ixo eouoa uuns Cw 0.4 d6. !a txL fA6 (VAC.4NT) LINCOLN PRO:laYlES orraavra a•xs•es dEi! 7-M 7-=NrIAL 9G.a/vT) t 7 �� Q L /9 M. VACANT �� Gr41V7-s): r ave 1�5�pleN77AL Ao ae� lal5 : L .HOUR COMMERCIAL i sreEEr Nr rZES /n NnrV- .40W �EI7tiJ�Y1 NORTH CIS or T ITEIM. RANCHO CLLAMOI GA TITLE: PLANNING DngsFON -r- E`CHlBi'I: ,• o, - --- SGtL.E. (�A tROaosEO ixo eouoa uuns Cw 0.4 d6. !a txL fA6 � gE, E'EN 4- 14 ew/' r, LINCOLN PRO:laYlES orraavra a•xs•es dEi! 7-M 9G.a/vT) ME,9 /UM Rca 4• 14 ,2alr7IAC. ( AGAPIT)� /aEY. !7 /5T_ : op /9 M. VACANT �� Gr41V7-s): r ave 1�5�pleN77AL Ao ae� lal5 : L .HOUR COMMERCIAL i sreEEr Nr rZES /n NnrV- .40W �EI7tiJ�Y1 NORTH CIS or T ITEIM. RANCHO CLLAMOI GA TITLE: PLANNING DngsFON -r- E`CHlBi'I: ,• o, - --- SGtL.E. K] 11 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DISTRICT CHANGE NO. 86 -01 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE DISTRICT DESIGNATION FROM OFFICE/PRGFESSIONAL TO LOW - MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DU/AC) FOR 3.67 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 19TH STREET WHEREAS, on the 27th day of May, 1986 an application was filed and accepted on the above - described project and WHEREAS, on the 13th day of August, 1986, the Planning Commission veld a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, the General Plan Land Use Plan designates the property as Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac); and WHEREAS, the proposed district change is necessary for consistency with the General Plan pursuant to Section 65860 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1; The kancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the f of l owi n g findings: 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and 2. That the proposed district change would not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and 3. That the proposed district change is in conformance with the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this projec wi not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on August 13, 1986. NOW, THEREFORE, 9E IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 13th day of August, 1986, District Change No. 86 -01. :...� •>` -+ .:;z 'RR - vwr'�.mc'kF�ka PLAIiNIN (i0hH�1TSS J RE=DO � i0N NO. ; DDP 86i Ol BROG DrE�VLLOP'M N August 13, 1986 Page 2 2. The Pl anni *vg C`ommi sJ on hereby recommends,"that the City Council approve and adopt District Change (to. 86-01. 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and relate'; material hereby adopted by the Planning 4pmmissian, ."shall be f°orr+ar`ded to the City Council. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1986, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE L'ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 6Y° Dennis i u , Chairman < ATTEST: Brad u er, epu y Secretary I, Brad %Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the toregoirtg Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Pilannng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planting Commission held on the 13th day of August, 1986, by the foliowit,§ vote-to-Wt: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES :: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ri a n a t M 4� , 0 DATE: TO:; FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT p z U > August 13, 1966 19777 a Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Howard Fields, Assistant Planner iNVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13353 - BROCK uartLurit M -'!'ne total developmen 0 acres 0 an to 55e ium Ri±sidentiai District (8 -14 du /ac) into a 3 lot residential subdivision for the development of a 64 unit multi - family condominium complex, located on th_a northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 19th Street. Apn: 202- 1091 -21. Related File: DDA 86 -01. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a Tentative Tract Map, building 06va ions an issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Project Density: 10.01 du/ac C. Surroumiing Land Use and Zoning: North Vacant, designated Medium Residentia? (8 -I4 du /ac); Foothill Freeway Corridor, designatec'L Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) South - Single family subdivision, designated Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac); small lot subdivision to the southeast, - designated Low Medium kesidential (4-8 du /ac) East - Neighborhood shopping center, designated Neighborhood Commercial West - Single family residence, vacant land, designated Medium Residential (8 -11 du /ac) D. General Plan Designations: C,oject Site - Designated Medium Residential (8 -14 du /ac) North - Medium Residential (8 -14 du /ac), Foothill. `reeway Corridor South Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac); Medium Residential (8 -14 du /ac) to the southeast East - Neighborhood Commercial West - Medium Residential (8-14 du /ac) ITEM K * m �., ,. �,�:...,.. .. __ a ... T, y�.....,:. ,s. =n•4�r.,,,�._ wig— .- .°�,' PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT August 13, 1966 TT 13353 - Brack Page 2 E. Site Characteristics: The project site i I t relatively flat sloping at less than 27. from north to south, with low growing grasses and weeds. F. Project Details: The project proposal comprises 64 condominium units arrange in a d1plex manner with the units attached at the garages. The floor plans feature three distinct layouts ranging from 960 square feet (2 bedroom, 2 bath), to 1,380 square feet (3 bedroom, 2 and 1 /2,bath). The unit mix consists of 27 two -story units and 37 one -story units. The one -story ,,.sits have been plotted along 19th and combination one -story and twa - story units are plotted along Archibald. Each unit features an enlarged rear yard area (see,1xhibit "K "). The elevations reflect a contemporary architectural styling with exterior materials consisting of flat tile roofs, hardboard siding, stucco and wood trim. 11. BACKGROUND: During a public hearing on November 6, 1985, the City Council approved General Plan Amendment 85 -04, to .amend the General Plan Lana Use Map from Office Professional to Medium Residentia^. (4 -14 du, ac). During deliberations, the City Council provided direction to Staff in evaluating future residential development on the site as follows: Single- story units shall be plotted alo,, Arc4ibald and 13th Street to provide residential compatabiiity and adequate transition of densities. - Future residential development shall be limited to approximately 8 units per acre for the southern portion as a maximum allowable density. - The applicant has filed a related Development District Amendment 136 -01, for the southern portion of the project site. The request is a change from Office Professional to Low Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac) consistent with the City Council direction a.,d in conformance with the General Plan.. III. ANALYSIS: A. Generals Approximately 370 square feet to 800 square feet pr vate yard area has been provided for each unit: Whereas,. the Development Code requires that each ground floor unit have a minimum of 225 square feet of private open spacr. area. Therefore the design emphasizes larger private yards as opposed i `ti— k PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT August 13, 1986 ` TT 13353 - Brock Page 3 `I to common open space. 2.09 acres of common open %space is f provided, including an 8,498 square foot central recreation area. Within the project, si ngl a story units were plotted along 19th Street. A combination of single and double story units t ' =�re plotted along Archibald to create visual inte:•est and i Provide a pleasing streetseape with various levels of building f' 'massing" (see Exhibit "E -1, E -2 ").. The project will take access from Archibald Avenue and 19th Street. The 19th Street entrance has reciprocal access with Lincoln Properties (DR 85 -21) to the west. The on -site circulation is adequate with an intet•nal loop road system. Each unit has a two car garage with 11 sanest parking stalls occuring along the drive aisl es. The pr%nj ect meets the parki 0q requirements with a total of 149 parking stalls. B. Desi_ga Review Committee: The Design Review Committee reviewed project on olw occasions and determined that the total project density of 10.01 and density trap,4,tions towards the south are within the parameters set by Couft6l. The Committee t, suggested revisions to the site plan in terms of proviions for €; common open space area, sidewalk connections from 19th Street and Archibald, and additional recreational ammeni ti es, such as a tot lot. Also, sidewalks were required on at least one side ' of the street within the project. The applicant agreed to make r changes to the site plan, architecture and landscaping plans per Ca mittee recommendations. 0 However, `ie- Committee discussed at length the following aspect of the ewised site plan: Open Space: Revised site plan provided 8,479 square feet cen —of open space area for active use. The Committee did not reach a concensus on the location of the common open space area within the project site. While a central location is usually preferred for proximity to all units, the location at the project entrance on Archibald would provide greater depth from Archibald for the entry driveway unobstructed by garage access. The Committee decided to refer this aspect of the project to the full Planning Commission. The applicant ha.; provided longer driveway aprons along this center drive to permit safer ingress and egress of vehicles (Exhibit "D"`). k_,s X PLAN11lN.8.ACO`*M IQN S171 FF REPORT August 13, 1586.E TT 13353 -Brock Page 4 C. Techn'i''';1 Review i:mmi ttee: The Committee reviewed . and e lards at " e protect- 'is The with all app'+cable standards and requirements subject to the fallowing gondition: a All overhead utility lines for 19th Street and Archibal & Avenue 4 frontages be placed undergr9ilnd prior to occupancy for the first Phase of the development. _ o An i n I'! eu fee be assessed for the street improvements on the west side of Archibald Avenue from 19th Street to the ' tract's nonthewly boundary. - Archibald Avenue is currently in deo.un for realignment from i9th Street to Highland Avenue as a City Capitol Improvement Project for the fiscal year 1986 -1987. Construction is scheduled for early 1987. o The Fire District required Knox Boxes be installed at the recreational area and _ emergency access at the northwest corner of the project site. r1 D. Envirormnental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study was i navesti gati on and compl etedaPart II Sof f the Iri ti ale Study which identifies several environmental impacts that can be thoroughly mitigated (refer to Part II Initial Study) and the following 3 major unavoidable adverse envirormentai impact- Impact a Noise sources from the future Foothill Freeway will produce harmful levels and exposure (see Exhibit "H "). According to the General Plan, noise mi ti gati on by Cal Trans is included i n the design of the freeway reducing noise levels by 10 D8A's below what would occur without mitigation. Any new development that 'lies within 70 to 75 DBA exterior noise contours without proper mitigation is unacceptdble. In addition, the noise exposure 4ill occur within dwelling units, the final coustical report will identify appropriate mitigation measures. 1 _q C PLANNING.COM47SS4MN- �VFAFF DEPORT August' 13, IM TT 23353 - Broak Page 5 Mitigation o Proposed mitigation measures require a final acoustical analysis showing how noise standards of 65 CttEL (exterior) and 45 CNEL (interior) can be met for dwelling units located adjacent to the proposed Freeway Corridor and along both Archibald and Igth Street. o Provide noise barriers or walls between noise sources and dwellings. o Intensify landscaping adjacent to the Foothill Freeway Corridor. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The findings listed on the attached Resolution are su;,Nor e y e following fac°zs: a. The proposed subdivision, is conjunction with the Conditions of Approval, is consistent and in substantial compliance with the current Development Standards and Regulations of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.. b. The project is adequata in size,and shape to accommodate the proposed number of units within the subdivision. c. Adequate street improvements will be provided to make the project compatible with the surrounding area. d. The project is consistent with the General Plan ar_d conforms with the Development Standards of the LM District in which the site is located. V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The daily Report as a pu6T3c Nearing. In addition, the gr� perty +�a� Dos p an notices advertising a puolic hearing were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. To date, no correspondence has been -- received regarding this project. k-5 z E PLAN R, tPORT Al PF � Augur 86 TT 133 - Brock" Page 6 VI. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends. that the Planning Commis sioi approve this project through adoption- of ,,,the attached Resolution anu issuance if a Negative Declaration appropriate. 4 would be lu full y su fitted, r;sp J;e B ul er City Planner BB:HF:dak Attachments: Exhibit "All 'Locat',I,on Map it, Exhibit 08" Site UtilizationMAp Exhibit "C" Tentative Tract Mq ,EXhibit I'D" Site Plan Exi.,*,bi t "E" Elevations ExV)i t 'IF" Conceptual Landscaping Tian Exhibit "G" Grading Plan Exhibit "G-111 - Grading Sections Exhibit "H. - Noise Contours Exhibit "I" - Rear Yard Details Exhi bi t, "ill - Schematic Land-Use Plan Part II, Initial Study Resolutlon Conditions os k- -r- VL 03 Fc FC i >� ..—. V L A` L L>(D j i:," r -�f i ,1 `lac ^ "J. LM PA ) r 41H a d - Nom; hl I � •...YI > .,,emu •{ ; ;. _ . ;i w - os �. I L LM .1: ' L Apt i. ,i _ .��'r-•- u . ........ .. . . 'LM H op `^ Mii LM I`dOG�C f LM l L l�j °� OR NC °, NC M 1� fl P v iLM cITTY o RANCHO CUL MUi \C•A. TITi�.E: PLJU\ ii�i '\<., DN1S'ION r:XHiRlT: f! HDUSE T. l4 0 %a dY7',l (VACAPir) Y LUW �55/17ENT!AL W y 0 RE I�EIV77AL 2 -4 �U'5fAG -4 t.Ct /AG 'A CAN 7-)T VAOANr�) �HdU� P °OPd9E� 12C GCNIrG iNffS /T7Ea. RCS /UEAfTU1 L ouIac ¢- l4 erS ♦r9� I � NN�04A PAflPlRtl65 \ / I �rrRrN�a a,2�.as 4EV. 17tST::iV1 � � ✓,as;.ANT} Nl6�lUN{ �� GON�utE' 4, vT,i 4- %4 .�1J'S %AG. (AGANT 2G/AL � • r � .ti�U. Cllr =A4 � l�EV. ,�l�T:�N op lgT' `/ °--- -,--- ---, -� sreuar V,40,An r CIT`S' Off' ECHO CI✓iC�., I OiNGA P"WiNG Iii ViSK N �str� rvrlA�. `N GdYJ c1.7tuit�l ' � • , rr,�,•S.�rf�G NUR rrE?vl: 7 "r. EYHIi3iT:�- _..5GA LE: ------- 4 5 { r•�„_... _ l���c -c__ ter-- ,,.;�_ —...., a t ..�... �..�,;. rMr�+f: r, t,: .� vC` :,.�. ZONED ( 1" mow? A �./l� � �_ y ^ _� —+'.. I i t :n .�.,. ^.�""'' �. « •.. «... n, .ripsr^� /1� .....y..— •--- �.,�,. i y s etl ..u..a.u. w.e.«mmw.nx. ���ti.... ✓ � / � /� �.��•� /jam, , � — � �� �� . �r .." °�C,' h �� nrrwt rrrvM : urvr srrria', 'V 00'U •36 ? 1' SINGLE m.+.r FAMILY RC•SIOEN77AL +•.�..c.r v TRACT No, 9250 ! .aerwecw0— 130 /44.46 ' .wnr cnvrro. RflRTH CrrY or - RANCHO Cdj,�CA TITLE: PI.Ai�tNI \G iViI EXHIBIT.- Cl —scku: � ,• yr` � ' �. I uo C0Nooi Mures u y t }'! f TRACT ga7 �i+• cis _ ) !J' a, >� - � r' i it �a 7 r U .. r' : • . K. _.� _: .•f ....mot ., -3 19Ti9 STREET a -- a a � 7 r y-a •a�- • csa`r�O•. uw iv �u= ��+.i•i rwT wWa�t - -°i'e �+ _ ra[Tj awcLarve W�— w*e••' /sblSn.atesrlay'sn•i 41 YWTi [:� -•--M[ O /aoa.pryyy1+�544� /ry[ Near. _77 ['G = 101_1 +iaa f�10e 1l�1ya -y. • 1pr,alf•'• wTw[— .,�:�rc C »ie iiKt NloaTH •. [t1KM•iJ ItH. /A[. fL114•a/!•<j 4UW.aG I91 _ . .� d-.� ��5' y•y1191UCLt . �rtcra -y�'� 1 q.,.ie6.gc �•f3Lw+nma(9e,^. K:N[tp ).. e'fy,c i2ssro+n.yp Cleb Ry9Mtpt CITY Or, rmm: 7777,emtrs ECHO CUCAMONGA Tats: •�'� .,air PL.I�.t�I?VIt \'G L}I�VISK�t Y v A 1-16 AR B ? B AR 4 � B G BUILDING PLAN TYPE G3 � �. BUILDING PLAN TYPE BAB wauvr.r -r ap 9UILDING ELEVATION a use e t it li l f RUIIDING ELEVATION AR v ..arm -. • BUILDING ELEVATION 79 RSTREIT - BUILDING ELEVATION "^ aracwaua —� BUILDIMS ELEVATION wu�." :-. 79Th SiAEEi' ICI 4' eh r a°cra tUILOING ELEVATION — °" ' i accESS aaatvE -aec iaa�o _ _ w— •t x .� or.rnF r BUILDNG ELEVATION�� ^ -- .cuu�e•r -• 797n STREET NORTH �� Q�' T T f1'E�I- �C�HQ CLCAI�0IGA Tom: PLAINNING Di FD., I t XHIMT: a BR L' Z=J p tSL FLOOR 7NO FLOOR BUILDING PLAN TYPE Be - - BR c CR BUILDING PLAN TYPE BCC BUILDING ELEVAMN au.0 rr- AOCESSDRIVE- ARCllALD . a BUILDING ELEVATION ++a EU-10 NG ELEVATION reuu n• -.w AACMSALO BUILDING ELEVATION aA 3 *L ^••• rr.r -r BUILDING ELE4ATi�N C BUILDING ELEVATION - anu BUILDING ELEVATION��' CITY OF RAT�cHO C TCAMONGA. lUl, wll"> C D>�JiS�O d N'OR n,. Tt-t 4Eee E�CHII3TI' ~ SGrkL. , _Y -` 'r n1- AR c cp eZ� AE a � CR A _ BUILDING PLAN TYPE ACC 2ND FLOOR t_T FLOOR - •^_ • yr .-r BUILDING KLAN TYPE CA tr HU1L%, G ELEVATION dm P BUILDING ELEVATION �A ACCESS DRNE- ARCM13Ai BUILDING ELEVATION BUILDING ELEVATION seru+rr..•r ARCHBALD 7 ,.cua.r „r BUILDING ELEVATION ca .. .. yon try 6Ufl DING ELEVATION D — BUILDING ELEVATION cR xne,r.r+ i�'aRTH CITY OF rr�tit: •r RANCID CUKAIVIONGA, Trru, �46e*'j PLAiNNI1C DrVtSM EYH�[3ir. „ M h k i is $ .....r• ." ice,:. r 0 10 z KI m k -.is u�3 W a i _ I %r 1 w - s _ U k -.is -V lu L 120 COND InACrI304 40 In CITY or, RANCHO CUCAMOINGA TrrLz.. PLtQNNIING DrVMN SECTON W-W mum. sus 1N to I CITY or, RANCHO CLTCAMOIN(-,A TrnZz e0 PLAi\ Nit-ING DrVISIaN - SUCTION SECTION $--a NoRni v a � c rt STREET nETAiLED SITE PLAN Y• e.... _ t!7M f NORTH CITY Or RANCHO CU��0iXG . TIrlu. r3eef p. , LAINNI \G DIVISEAN XHIE3fI': SGttT_ r_ is p- l z d {{ i i t nETAiLED SITE PLAN Y• e.... _ t!7M f NORTH CITY Or RANCHO CU��0iXG . TIrlu. r3eef p. , LAINNI \G DIVISEAN XHIE3fI': SGttT_ No lu . 7 �Umr B UNIT LILUMATIVE LAYOUT OF SIDE YARD CM-,r OF RANCHO CTUICAIMOINGA PLANNING DrvqS[O.N EAKH I r RESOLUTION NO. 4 ` { A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY' OF RANUO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, 40NOITIONALLY APPROVING v TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13353 AND DESIGN REVIEW THEREOF WHEREAS, Teotative Tract Map No. 13353 hereina; °ter "Map" submitted ny k Gary Mitchell, applicant, for the purpose of suhdiatding the real property situated in the City of. Rancho Cucamonga, County 'of San Be:n ardino, state of California, described as the total development of 6.83 acres of land in the A Medium Residential Di s" ict (1444 du /ac ) into a three (3) lot residential e < Subdivision for the development of b4 unit condrminum complex located on the northwest corner of trhibald Avenue and 19th Street, APN: 202- 1091 -21 into 3 lots, regularly came-before the Pl ailni ng Commission for public hearing and action on August 13, 1986; and L, WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of i,vx Map subject to all conditions set forth is the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commissiw has read and considered thez Engineering and Planning Division`s reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows- SECTION 1• The Planning Commission ;Hakes the following findings in regard to enta •tve tract No. 13353 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed (d) The design of the subdivision is no, likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to human, and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not confl;cl with any easement acquired by the public at largF, now of record, for access through or use of the property within t1le propos; ?d subdivision. PLANNING COMISSION RESOLUTION Aug4st 13, 1986 TT 13353 - Brock Page 2 (9) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Kdp No, 13353, a copy of which is attached eri eTo, iss hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions; i DESIGN REYIEW; K I. An erosion and dust control plar shall be submitted for review and approval by the Su',lding and Safety Division prior to issuance of Wilding perrits. 2. Noise standards of 65 CNEL` (exterior) and 45 CNEL (interior) shall be met for dwellings located within 400'' feet of the Route 30 freeway corridor. A final acoustical analysis shall be submitted with the construction drawings to plan checking prior to - issuance of building permits. 3. All outdoor mailbox locations shall be covered and appropriate lighting provided. The final design shall be compatible with the building architecture and shall be submitted for review and approval by ti* Planning Division prior to issuance of buiT _ing permits. 4. Low level lighting shall be provided in all open space areas. Construction details zhall be provided prior to issuance of building permit:. _ 5. Special landscaping theme statement at Archibald Avenue and 19th Street shall be provided on final landscaping plan (i.e. water element) as well as special landscaping entry statement at Archibald Avenue entry and 19th Street entry (i.e. special accent shrubs /trees and annual color). 6. Fina` landscaping plan shall provide unifying landscaping theme for entire project including special accent shruhs and trees to delineate open space area, subject to review and approval by City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. 7. Dense landscaping (15 gallon trees, 151 on center) shall be provided along entire north and wrest property line. (A minimum 60% Evergreen tree type). landscaping AML S. Final plan shall provide dense planting southerly and westerly along exposure itigat9 solar heat gain. e> PLANNING COMMISSIONAESOLUTION August 13, 1956 TT 13353 - Brock Page 3 9. Provide Evergreen tree types (minimum 15 gallon) and shrubs in planter areas adjacent to garage doors. 10. Submit material sample board to City planner for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 11. Submit sign permit application and details of project directory sign and other monument signs to the City Planner for review and approval, prior to issuance of building permits. 12. Final design details of perimeter block 711 shall j be submitted to the City Manner fo, :view and approval prior to issuance of buildin_ -mits. TENTATIVE TRACT: f 1. OVERHEAD UTILITIES A. ARCHIBALD AVE. - Existing overhead electric lines on the west side of Archibald Avenue from the first pole south of 19th Street to the First pole north of the northerly property line shall Abe placed underground prior to occupancy B. 19TH STREET Existing overhead electric nines and telecommunication 'lines on the north side of 19th Street from the first pole east of Archibald Avenue to the first pole west of the westerly property line shall be, pl «red underground prior to occupancy. 2. The applicant'shall construct the driveway on 19th Street in alignment with Klu3man Avenue, 3. The driveway along Archibald Avenue shill align with the driveway for the shopping center, on the east side of Archibald Avenue. 4. An in -lieu fee shall be required for street improvements along Archibald Avenue prior to issuance of a building permit for the first phase of development. The limits shall include from 19th Street to the northerly boundary of the tract. 5. Street vacation for the portion of Archibald Avenue shall be provided by a sep&rate instrument and not recorded unt -1 completion of the Archibald Avenue real i gr+ment, 5. A flood protection wall or drainage ditch shall be provided along the north and west property boundary for sheet flow protection as determined by a lc PL A I G G.' 11 4 7 ESWITION August 13,x- 986 TT 13351- BrocR Page 4 drainay!� study and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 7. The on -site drain pipe shall connect directly into the existing storm drain pipe in Archibald. Avenue, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC94ONGA r BY: k, ennis Stout, Ai'TEST: Brad u er, epu y ecre•ary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning COmmissio of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby,' certify that the foregoi?g Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day,,of August, 1966, by the Following vote -to -wit: 4 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ;XES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: -a3 u ^ N u S V O r d V •�' C C O A ^ a 9V •Y • 9 F d' .� G cyf- �yj_�l FF RC�6 b EopE .E oy . . N. V N V R. 6 1. O E a. c Y A^ L O d N X 4 0 L d6 �+O G C b H 0 R9 Y O 9 q 0 6 P 0 9 `.y d..,. - A ENa° n a�CAd O `A NCU E. Yyi� drY u-mO 1 . •O W�a Y...££. =qN Od. Lp. E i +'. AY Caw.�M xr 2,G E Etl as ~ 7 1 ZN RLOaq SW x � m..+ CCd �o�quA 9wi 2du LO qU. gGL66W N^ .i' �.> N C cN- L a .CAC N C E u x 0 R 2.6 a a« c n ig E V r d y. 61 n C c q C AMr i9H O.a d 4O' N GE6 i>7 O •9y... WE !! ^p Zq^ N.V^ 9a..La9 ALN q66 ^y.L O- y R1 ,uOn.Y . L C aa.� s 'U!j`. ` G n a,.y@ �q EQr NCC 6inOfCp��pu o> ya G E c^ Y E E G 4 iL dGGm >a. Tf0 Nd >dy. G+rA C+ 3 C O. •x• Y A 9 2 N L A 3 •- � O O y x O: Y !H 6 N r Y +_+. 2 4 O A �.. O^ W L� ^ d• nV I�� N V CM = da x 0 0 O O r o ? E O x I- y Cf Rn AuR a c 6 N O C M fl E u d C= s 2 J mO 9 Ob Y. >00 y� Cy y ° a>u• ^ F • O ¢ ~ V R W N w L Lq� 6 Aqe qua GG U ^E Oy ^ O y9El A C y xLe CxY` o 'O t J o-4. ' Y 4 n•�ri R 0 0 E cb d U ,cpp E e-i LIT. a Z V Q: .Q Q. Yu ✓9 Gp—p^ C >rno CM Orc a�>.wad: AUy N jr; G o�w.o F � AOQ �F ia. p =� On 2 � LgLn pcc � �p Z G d 6U s « w U UOU L 9 qu E A p0 A A S 'G n Rq4 Cy CC Rao OyU � wti 60 nC L C E N C^' NLA— E m wM.CL�aL`. yE€C9hS Ur..O O n0 9 .up.QE n aN F d u L N LO c n N L L a n YO q9L `q. tit 2. c L °w m 0 N E d is 6 U O A C♦ N �' q q g u N L 6U A 3. A.s NhNL dYN' +L U< �qd6 yC U p 6Ui 0 t� p�NA bE4 +'d'`9 urn Ao�L p 6,OyN �O 'Yt' ApawL Y.c... % S N 9 Q d � U p9 7 Y E 6 % LY TO G'1 w0 c'^� rV.0 Y3'O 9 6 L F� < q • y � Q L u �m � N F d . a. O- Oag H N L GO O iL qT Ysq p >•y.,' yN S U Y 24 R-s Eli 6« +p O2 -, a UOL U ? OdN M6L r0-� O1 L...L9 6 ki u L 6 6 n O „ T `.r.C.c % Q w N N c 2 ..E-'u N S SNYy ¢ r 6 w`^ ^2 �i C 6 Lqua v� ^w O. n lsl�lIN'I �I a -T T�y� U> Y V1Lr WtiG m Y w ^. G � Wy 9�A�eU1 L.�- ''.sUiL O��ra >A O VU y b O d L p 3 NAL c q 4. n..N c'L 66' p L Loo b 0 LGr-U L O W HV � =r r n0 2 >b Urr 0 0 C.4"ou =rMOM N Z y N= N U Uv rv'n .Cy .UyN Pyu tlYWI Aw UQ N� ~y qnN Ne ^c .cf.' BE OT xp L 9 q < R <yu Oq N X� M� _ ,...T gOaL < E.r Vr q6 U y cdyLq 0�} U'C CON UN V .L.�Q`-�� CI < �. • d= u o C u /= V� W 9^ ' T O N a n q v rN- w" A a °' a o r d _ Y p d y nN N N No UN T >UC Ln NL c 'U9� V L C OWN aNi y c NEON � —` d L J g c :sF C = N d c d N UgL N V1LAL � r — w' z V EE•wr c d YA> LpOU <�� p O Edy. Cc0 4 , Dt V CqG .-q0`l Y09 N S 4 U OLL990p J✓ U, 6 Z �' < E Vy+ w t d y LOp n U O n E C 3 IL Cl) -ap�eo co a. .c°�a dN c0 o°fT, mom. Crai+O ` � d E b q.Y- 9 V N. >ldy G u... 6 Na S ^� K. n .. afr .n v01O V Ae�'iLbi Y «quG u� CIL In It lw Nb N A d °VO L'dC •° 4yln L Ja L Qy �1rV` 4J �uVL V61 4 NV dM :4— 04, •� CId {q N.5 �1 «� 6 C Oda V �N U.yi. LNrn w yay Nb »i viAi a°ay TA OI `` Olr aA° Od AC SI QL,.t� b0 EE Et gs Y • x CA Qn � L p. d pNa.- d V N4. tC �jad.. LG 6 ° C .-u U 4•u q0 L �qC.. R.R. u °+°L ulbLO ^.0 C H. T-. 6ua Vob U O. Lbu �� °S UV=z N A_ a q u.0 y 4iN0 AV °�r31p LO0. ° dl f�c�' -L G�Gf >G 60 p, In.X OL dd Ip .Y�I A OL mbNq a.q d"HU p.c dam.. D.0 yb �N Za °-yL m�C Vy »y GNd1a W ^H^' y„N O rL NN L A Dj 6< C5 'V^O y ^uE .9 E' C ^07. C LOL viLn .22 YCI 1 CY >IP4yM VI�•lil 4h.A- Q•d SNO fN i Yom. q }qqx 6O 4i�O4 4d Ii.ON I� \6N 11 1 I Cl) qq_Q •- a L Crai+O ` � d E b q.Y- 9 V N. >ldy G u... 6 c A. L Cpl < S S qy y�G Oq c2• �.N Y Cd dam• -�- u� CIL In It lw Nb ~aapEir °VO L'dC •° 4yln L Ja L Qy �1rV` liil~ �y4 s -z ' by d b u .rw AQ _ v S C. 2 >N by C l.°•° 3Q •. A ydG bLd N%Ay Yti o V e y o AbLOE Ed gs Y • x CA Qn � L p. ° d V N4. tC �jad.. LG 6 ° C .-u U 4•u q0 L V C b d CC byb p A .r- y d q A.6 OL y� r ulbLO ^.0 C H. T-. 6ua Vob U O. Lbu �� °S UV=z lw Y1 gNg. A_ a q u.0 y 4iN0 4 Nlrm > CroM F• pN KU G9 f pN+` -N G�Gf >G 60 p, 9 ^Lp Sul p,d IJG yM.VAS.0 II°. • Cl) -7777 ` 7 1-8 -15.9 a % g .1 se:-, P.2 .9 4J u Tx. ci W, CL -W.— to I -o I 4! A UZ =6 -Z.5 % .2. o' t'o popt k .—Pa a.E k:5 2 Vma 1. IRA N 40 1 1-8 t a se:-, P.2 .9 T5 Tx. T W, T- 7 92'- N to I -o I 4! A UZ =6 40 1 t se:-, P.2 .9 Tx. T T- -n! US =6 -Z.5 % .2. o' t'o popt k .—Pa a.E & 11 16 22, T tz - c Im 5 -o. _ u 17 u. I o ;X A 1; G�—. —'E u8z, R 40 1 0 GAG % A.4 9 dm a y u pN v CLA Y LN='ip- 1.—,Z d d Lu E d& W� D 2.4 qNC N F a ° Eg VYG~ N COQ... GD O q = Tb aL°j x iC � Ur � N G E 9 q « N 2 C u ^n `J ELF dU�y Lrn d.61 w.a.l � IN L o a°iEL yn odd caL ° d �Y N M �O ud p y d L N4nq r d d� ^.rG a0 x� jE 3'N^ N` U Olq i0 a. d � rn0 9'=C O Y <. G'. iq .^-axi NE iY` ip T LA N L E o N•C- NVF n0 IGO Tali WN WUU �c+4 L'L•. U�0.2 Kaz+ <O 60�Y 1-0 4 A �L m'a'u Co OUO as o a iO >' _ D °uo oa t.G v; d V) ww c ^m7E a �\ � o a J 0 GAG % A.4 9 dm a �''D.O u pN Oi E CLA Y LN='ip- 1.—,Z d d Lu E d& W� C t} qNC V� 9qY L WF COQ... O q = Tb aL°j x iC � Ur � N o d y i., ^n tO by o. � ZZ ^ Y ^y a°iEL yn oyq O u E'.nu E4'u N M �O c6 ~ d. N4nq �uDp d� ^.rG a0 x� jE OO Vjp L° Ft r O �.0 viiLC iC 1 yyu O.a+ oo u9 V} Epqp ^N l G V.v) Y NVF n0 IGO Tali WN WUU �c+4 L'L•. U�0.2 Kaz+ <O 60�Y 1-0 4 A d Y f 1 0 i b An Z 4J V d •n i Q N a�', of t a o00 � of .pia u LL ud ' S,rg 9 + a �y �U C LY 6 y � �dPp 9L C. C '• ,•a a '•' u A N� N y.' N u c u'°. F y N � Mr+ Y C v V V y 0 w d N .c q v E g L L N Y 6T d' u O•N � U O d O V L p L dY d u^ 6 dO L Y d r F • 1� t t N = 'CC b C M b F C T q C � L at 'w y W. G N4Q B X N .•F[ N^ V q "E.2 V 4 L q b p 0 y a y C 0.�� CW pn 6 o.L F.LOp� oy� Cq 1.a Y4 01� OL L. rJ q L O U A Vero T L��C O•A Nu �w9,. y ��. q T O t O cv•,°, �+." Y so..Fd --� e. ."w s' Ly ic^ 7 w cq..a '.i� Cvd d:� p 9 ^V 6 CyaV+G C � 9.�OMd 6W v. p9Y Mp CE. COW H� Y �' �YC }Y Y dFa d � ♦^...m- ..- ip p It aµ2 pjn ipp>•q� q�:�0 'W Cali acct >.a� �L y.Y.. �^o�YUW V. C,O. ^ L O di dmrn q q•T.G �. NCl D.6 N` di °t>. ua9i LY N Ei+ C `duC T i .a• O N!'6LA +dam a+.aE u m 66Nr 1?O�N L WD u +T yMY 4V w� '^ W t LU SO YlC 4 4 «v v 3Y�M g ma r S,rg 9 + a �y �U C LY 6 y � �dPp 9L C. C O a+ '•' u A y Q �7 C� � CZ N1 ='•'aC �r O � Mr+ Y C v V V y r9O r 4 3 y t • ` c nq €'" ca a` N E W NS �C10 c S V c9 do NN o :-8 YLi a.am .aa NM 24 LL V xm c a, C' u.- O H O d o `e •r a >. i C � 7 � a a a _ y °€ ° n f Mo ENE i O pqd 6 y � T d y S O a+ '•' u A U W � O c u a av► W H h� N 1Ra ¢ u v 4 rf E avu I W NS UE ra m r U' t7 24 LL V rl _ �411 n O ° d o `e •r a >. i C � 7 � a a a _ y °€ ° n f Mo ENE i O pqd 6 y � T d y S O a+ '•' u A c u a av► N 1Ra ¢ u v 4 rf E avu I 0 I I i �':' 1� 1 O1u cG C q Ay D d « m d «t aLy =a p ^ w d aJ. pm c, ` c 3 d• O % �C t N k 0. Yp T a y ° q y ... d Lta m nn q <E L L nn n4 xd ° 4. L ye d ° v G .•.6 t Y dx .c U C N D U C cry V D T E t v L c Y Z-4 U a L« ° qA ^ 0i. Z OF lo I t'aw CC p° nMD •+9M. 4..\» 07• OrN GIN N \. N � a LL6 6 N 1•lT y A °. »+« o do °1iou a Ud LL A O N '•aj ^ O L� a N EEdO Y EO O. O. A ° C N n L « S ^ io A.a 3" N+ a Q Y 7 > d u i ^IL. c 6 Aa p- w V-5 uW 79 2 a .uC xd° Y« q N Ki .d. dd u Y9c oa. `d a o�� a �� =pqEE n Ni t a ` q G Cy 90 6 « N W C y W •r9eJ ^x ^ S u O Oy« V« d �G • qC O•. qop ° IS-V r. lt-Y -« 46N 6N Jid p �wy 2� 1-a=i n• .5« 2 YD. uu ydo ca C 4 ° ^ � o ON iq u aJ ° L u p O° Ca nL q A J ila v 3 •«,• L E M" u O N d G « y oo. a ° y O x d LL cL �� ° d Q ua �� g� L� O_ �I til F Pk DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIdONGA STAFF REPORT O O F � z U > August 13, 1986 tar, Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner\ Lisa Wininger, Assistant Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPME:A AGREEMENT 86 -02 - t WIT -" Ue KANIA0 GWAMUNUA - A request to amend fhe Development 1s ric s map from ' "L " (2 -4 du /ac) to "LM" (4 8 du /ac) for 13.55 acres of land located on the south side of Feron, east of Archibald- APR 204- 055 -02, 03, 14, I. BACKGROUND: Staff has initiated a Development District Amendment Tor -as-lie- located on the south side of F - -on Avenue, east of Archibald. This request is one of the apps -1:,1 s required for the North Town park land donation process. Gens,�rai Plan Amendment 86 -OIA for this site was approved "on April 2, 1386, changing the General Plan designation from Low Density Residential (2-4 du /ac) to tow Medium Density Residential (4-8 du /ac). State law requires that the V°velopment District designations be consistent with the General Plan land use designations. Although a General Plan amendment has been granted, the site cannot receive further approvals until the process has been completed and the Development District Map has been amended. The issues which -were discussed regarding the General Plan- Amendment are described fully in the attached staff re;*r,t. However, through the General Plan Amendment hearing process, all land use issues have been resolved and no significant issues exist regarding the Development District Amendment. An Initial Study was prepared in accordance with the environmental analysis for GPA 86 -01A. No significant environmental impacts, have been identified. The other item which will be discussed in relation to this site is a density bonus agreement. This item will be presented as Dircctnr's Reports on this agenda. ITEM L } �, I PLANNING Ct�MMTSSIN SfAfF' C�012T Development Disirict Amenclntent 86 -02' August 13, 198C a Page 2 v ' II, RECOMMENDATIQAi Based on the 'approval — of General Plan M endmant 86-01-A, staff recommends approval of District Amendment 86 -OZ and issuance the subsequent Dever6pment of a Negative Declaration. �w•: Should the P'la�ining Commission concur, approval of the attached Resolution recommending approval to the City Council would be re ui q Ced. Respectfully szbmitted, _ E Brad Duller City Planner kk. Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map April 2, 1986 Staff Report Resa� utiorl of Approve } �, I { MEDIUMI i-(OQL SITE... � .F �v ow- TIT 7. 4•:a 7 � . � : O .:R J. IMfr.t �. � 16i , 9 GENET N Fe CITY OF RANCHO CU :A.MOX�GA. PUNNINr, DIVISICXN ITEt *,I- p �L-- TITLE: I r 11 /llrLp XHIBIT M' SCALE.- NORTH i fi+ CITY OF RANCHO CUCA viONtIA cvCA STAFF REMIT DATE: April 2, 1986 U(=�Jj TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, city Planner BY: Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND XNERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86 -01A tlWr',W- A request t4 an"'nd the a�Ose 7a-p--o the enera an from Low Dee. y Residential (24 du /ac) to l Low Medium Density Residential (4 -8 du /ac) for 13.55 acres of land located rig the south side of Feron Bivd, between Archibald and Turner Avenues - APN 209- 055 -02, 03, & 14. 1. BACKGROUND: On Ferri; ^ry 19, 1986, the City Council held a Public Hearin on this ite►7i 'and determined that approval of the proposed Amendment would be apprppriate, However, at the time the required documen.i.' -bn authorizing the applicant to act on behalf of the property :ler was not submitted to Zhe City. Consequently, the City rouncii held off rn, approval of the required Resolution 'g submittal of such authorization by, the applicant. On March 10, 1986, we received the appropriate materials along with a letter from our City Attorney stating the authorization is in order. No additional informwtion is needed prior, to final action on this /p l i cati on. - I R- OMM RATION: Approval of the attached Resolution and the i ua o a gative Declaration is recommended. - o�.,a grad /Bull ear City Planner BB :OK :das Attachments: Letter from City Attorney Authorization February 19, 1986 Council Report Resolution Of Approval —Al NUMBER ONE CIVIC CENTER C CLE- ' FOURTH FLOOR - JAMES L. MARKMAN P.O. SOK I0 S9 E ANCREW V. ARCZYNSKt BREA,CALI'FORNIA 920 "sOS9 RALPH O. HANSOM 17141 99c 1:301 O. +rRAIG FOX ?£LEPNONE 1NARTi.IA JO GEISLCR 12131 691 -3911 " March 6,- 1986 Otto Kroutl Senior Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 8G7 ,., Rancho Cucamonga, California 91'30 Re: Hawkins General Plan Amendment C' s Dear Otto: 1c Enclosed please find an origina3. of the letter S requested verifying the fact that the proper party has applied for the above-- refezenced` general play_ atne:dment. k` The letter is in order so long as the propel:ey' :f;escription stated in the. letter matches the property to which t;ne general pl%n amendment could apply. Assuming that the correct pF:operty is described, the mratter ought to be placed back on the Ccuncil consent calendar for tha, next meeting far final approval. Please call if you have any questions. Very truly yours, Jame» Markman City Attorney City of Rancho Cucamonga JLM:sjk Encl. A —RECEIVED — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION MAR 10158^ pul 7 18r9110111112ii i2A41 6 • LAW OFFICES SANGER. GRAYSON, GIVNER 8 BOOKE . A PARSNERaNiP 1 \[( �I \t'. PROFESSIO\AL CORPORAf1O\A FIRST INTERSTATE SANK BUILDING SUITE 8 -002 IG633 VENTURA BOULEVARD, SUITE 600 PLEASE REPLY To 40q SOUTH 11.10aL ORIyE { ENCINO, CALIFORNIA 91436 -1662 Encino PAW4 5PRINCS, CALIFORNIA:, 42262 TELEPHONES (818') 783 -3720 TELEPHONE (619) 320- ]=.�cf (2 3) 277.226? OFFICE TELECONER (818) 788 -3045 - OUR FILE NO. D4600 -000 I March 4, 1986, i a acmes Matkman, Esq. Duplicate Via Messenger City Attorney Post DffiCa Box 1059 Bx-a, California 92222_1059 r Re: Deukmejian Family Trust Dear Mr. Markman: E' This letter will confirm that in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Deukmejian Family Trust dated March 22, 1979 (the "Trust"), dean Deukmejian is presently sole trustee of the Trust with full power an; authority to execute ai ±y and all documents in Connection with the sale, n:ort:gage, rezoning or development of the Trust Estate or any part thereof, including, FTithout limitation, the processing of a general plan change for the real 'property legally described as Lots 1, 2 and 3 of Tract 5955, Reversion to Acreage, as per Plat recorded in Book 74 of Map., page ZO, Records of the County of wan Bernardino, State of California. Should you have any further questions with respect to f the foregoingr please address them to the underswgned at the above - referenced office. ery ? Z ' T MICHAEL SILVER Sanger, Grayson, Givner & Booke DWS /blm cc: Wean Deukmejian Pam Morale3 a'ohn Hawkins I 0 DATEz TO: FROM: BY: SOBJECT, CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA I STAFF REPORT February 19, 1986 Mayor and Members of the City Council Brad Buller, City Planner Lisa Wininger, Assistant Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENFRAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86-01A, - HAWKINS- - A request to amend the Land use Mao of the 'd—efteral Plan from Lz�w Density Residential (2-4 du/ac) to Low Medlum Density Residential (4-8 du/ac) for 13.55 acres of fan4 located on the south side of Feron Boulevard between Archibald and Turner Aventies - APN 20?�055-02, 03, 14, I. BACKGROUND: The applicant requested a General Plan Amendment from Low De5-s—iiy Residential (2-4 du/ac) to Low Medium Density Residential (4-8 du/ac) for a 13-55 acre site located in the No;th Town neighborhood of Rancho Cucamonga.. A previous General Plan application for this site which requested an increase in density to Medium Density Residential (4-14 du/ac) was denied by the City Council in December 1985. The attached Planning Commission report provides more detailed information relative to this item. II. PLANNING COWRISSIGN ION: The majo-, issues considered by the Planning Commission at the January 22, 1986 hearing were land use compatibility and consistency with the goals and--policies of the General Plan. The Planning Commission determined that the change to Low Medium Density would not create significant land use incompatibility with existing single family levelopment. surrounding the site. Issues regarding compatibility of housing type in the 4-8 du/ac range with the predominantly single family detached homes in the neighborhuod could be resolved through design and site plan review at the project level. Additionally, the location cf tho Low Medium Density project within a Low Density area was determinF-d to be consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan by "encouraging greater �tousing diversity without changing the single family character of the surrounding residential neighborhood." Thus, the proposed change appears to be consistent with the General Plan if the single family character of the neighborhood is preserved by use of a compatible project type. e- -9 A cs 7 ,_tom F . 'CITY COUNCIL. STAFF;REPORT" � "Y GPA86 -OIA - HAWKTNS' ` February 19, 1985 y' Page 2 ` III. RECOMMENDATION: The =:Planning Commission recommends approval of the Genera' -Plan . Amendment and, issuance of a Negative Declaration. If the City Council 6oncur$; adoption of the "attache& `ResolU, ion of Approval would be a0propri4te. Should the Council not concur, a Resolution of Denial is also attached. It should also be .noted that the "City ,ittorney advised staff, and the applicant that prior to Council approval, additi`bnal documentation WouTJ' be regd,ired, indicating the appl`icant °' is r authorized to act on b�! elf of property owner. As of this wr4ti'ng,.. this documenation ;has ;not been received. Unless satisfactory documentation is received prior to -the hearing, this item should be continued. Resgectfuliy bmi , ,�1� � k, Brad Buller City Planner Ir BB:LW:ko ti V Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report.,•Ianuary 22 1986 Minutes cif January 22, 1986 Planning Commission Meeting Resolution_:of - Approval Resolution of Denial A cs 7 ,_tom El D ---- CITY OF RANCHO CUC.A.,'ViONGA ��� r�� STAFF REPORT G �. �k DATE: January 22, 1986 y�L is TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Cr „mmir ion FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Lisa t;ininger, Assistant Planner r SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86 -OIA - HAWiCINS A request to amend the Land Use Map of the General Plan from Low Density Residential (2 -4 du/ac,) to Low Medium Density Residential -(4 -8 dutac) for 13.55 acres of land located on the south side of Feron Boulevard, east of Archibald - APN 209- 055 -OC, d3, 14. I. ABSTRACT: A General Plan Amendment is requested from Low Density Residential to Low Medium Density Residential for a 13.55 acre site located in the North Town neighborhood of Rancho Cucamon a (see Exhibit "All). The applicant previously requested General Plan Amendments to Medi:m-High Density Residential and to Medium Density Residential, which were denied by the Planning Commission and City Council after review of the Environmental Impact Report and discussion regarding land use compatibility issues. At this meeting, the Commission will receive public input and consider the General Plan Amendment to Low Medium Density Residential (4 -8 du/ac). II. BACKGROUND: The project applicant, John Hawkins,:has requested a General Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential (2 -4 du/ac) to Loan Medium Density Residential (4 -8 du /ac). In 1984, tla applicant submitted a request for General Plan Amendment 84 -03A from Low to Medium-High Density Residential. After preparation of an EIR as required by the Commission, it was determined that the approval of the application would create significant environmental - impacts which could not be mitigated. In addition, significant land use compatibility problems were noted. The Amendment was denied by the Commission, appealed to the Council, and in June 1985, denied by the Council. In September, 1985, the applicant submitted an application for General Plan Amendment 85 -04D for a change to Medium Density Residential. The application was denied by the City Council in December 1985 on the grounds that the land use change was inconsistent with the policies of the General Plan relating to the land use compatibility and transition of density. The applicant has now resubmitted at a lower density range. e_ _/0 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT General Plar. Amendment 86 -01A January 22, 1986 Page 2 :a III. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action ggtluested: Environmental Assessment per the attached E, Initial Stidy and consideration of the General Plan Amendment. B. Location: `outh side of Feron Boulevard, between Archibald and Turner. C. Parcel Size: 13.55 acres. D. Existing Zoning: Low Density Residential. E. Existing Land Use: Vacant. F. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Rancho Cucamonga Middle School, designated Low Density Residential (2 -4 du /ac). South - AT & SF Railroad right of way and winery, designated Industrial Specific Plan. East - Single family homes, designated Low Density Affilh Residential (2 -4 du /ac). 'nest - Single family homes, designated Low Density Residential (2 -4 du/ac). G. General Plan Designations: North - Low Density Residential. South - General Industrial (Industrial Specific Plan). Fast Low Density Residential. West - Low Density Residential. H. Site Characteristics: The site lies at the terminus of a - drainage channel with a small drainage course traversing the center of the site in a north -south direction. A large portion of the site lies within the 100 year flood plain and is subject to periodic flooding. Vegetation consists of a row of Eucalyptus trees along Feron, scattered trees, shrubs and grasses. Feron Blvd. provides direct access to the site, with Main Striet dead- ending into the site an the east and west property boundaries. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The final EIR for General Pian Amend— mept P_C-DA discusses potential environmental impacts for four alternative ` od uses for the site; Low, Low Mediuir„ Medium and Mixed Use. the discussion of Low Medium Density stated that this alternative represented no significant impacts. Based on the e_ _/0 PLANNING-*OMMISSI<ON STAPF REPORT General P1n`Amendment 86 0'4 January 22, 1988 Page 3 conclusion of the attached Init=ial Study, -and the EIR, staff recommends issuanco` of °lNegative Declaration ,for General Plan Amendment 86 -01A.: \, V. GENERAI- PLAN AMENDMENT ANALYSIS: The major issues to be considered regarding this -application are band use compatibility -,of the proposed density wit4 existing development and consistency with the goals and!. policies of the General P'Tan. In the Low Medium Densitt/ range of 44 du /ac, development could thenreticaliy'.accur i iith .housing types in a single family, zero lot line, dupldxr,or low rise townbcase - type pattern.. Since the sur,:oinding area is' developed with older single Jfamily detached homes with densities up to approximately 16 units per acre, development in this range could be compatible with existing development. Development at the higher end ,Of the 4 -8 unit range could create some incompatibility with surrounding development. However, this. concern can be addressed through.:appropriate design and site planning: at the project 'level to assure compatibility and proper transition. The General Plan states that Low Medium: Density is "characterized by residential densities somewhat greater than the Low Density Residential groop." It states, that Law Medium the would be appropriate within low density areas to encourage greater housing diversity without changing the single family character of the 'urrounding residential neighborhood. Therefore, it appears that 3evelopment of the site at a Low Medium Density is not inconsistent with the goals of the General Plan, provided that -the single family nature of the area is preserved by use of '.a compatible project type. VI. FACTS FOR FINDINGS:- Should the Commission, upon examination of the Genera l TTa—F-Amend.ment, determine that the change from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential would promote the land use goals of the General Plan, and that this Amendment would not be materially injurious to the adjacent properties, the following findings are necessary on approval:' A. The Amendment does not conflict with the La,t'd Use Policies of the General Plan, and; C. The Amendment promotes goals of the Land Use Element, avid, C. The Amendment would not be materially injurious to th4 aeiacent properties. � 01 �i FYI' SPA �r PLANNING COM'JSS QPl:SfAF f EPORT � .: General ''Plan Ameodmeiat,, 85 -01F, January 22; 1985 Page 4 �, ^w k[F[ J ;. VII. CORRESPQ °�gEffCE: This item has been advertised as a,public hearing ` in The Daily 7keport and notices v(Orc sent to all property owners within 300: feet of the boundary of the proposed property;- in addition to other Uterested area .resi4ents. A.4 foot by g foot supplemental notificatron ii,,n has also been erected orb -site. VIII. RECOMMENDATIU: Should the Commission determine, that the reeuiY ^ed' - Facts for in can be met, addpti.on of the ai�tached ResolO -inn - of Approval • a k acrd. Balm a of :'Neg_ative Zec ratior� would be ' appropriate, Should the Commission determiiio that the .'acts for ;+ a ' Findings cannot.be.;net, a Resolution of Deniai is also attached. Respectfully submitted,. Brad Buller ; 4. City Plarner ;1� BB:LW:ko Attachments: Exhibit "A'r - Vicinity Map Initial Study Resolution of Approval Resolution of Denial M DRAFT EXCERPT - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JANUARY 22, 1886 N. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86-OIA - HAWKINS - A request to amen ,te an se ap of e General Plan from ow uensity Residential (2 -4 duJac) to Low Medium Density Residential (4 -8 du ac) for 18.55 acres of land located on the south sids of Feron Boulevard, east of Archibald - APN 209- 055 -02, 03, 14. Brad Buller, City Planner, reviewed the staff' repi:rt. Commissioner Barker asked if the project was a: market rate project, could the developer come in with a request fob a tonus thereby increasing the density. Mr. Buller replied that a 25% density bonus could be possible which would increase the number of u:: is from 8 to 10. He additionally advised that, this ty would be an issue addressed by both the Planning Commission and the''Ci Council, if requested by the applicant. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Tracy Tibbails, 10522 Wilson, Rancho Cucamonga, addressed the C°-snission on `)ehaif of the applicant. Mr. Tibballs acknowledged that the 25% density bonus issue for affordable housing ;f req'ested would be addressed by the Planning Commission and City Council at a lAer date. He requested approval of the General Plan Amendment from Low Density to Low Medium Density. Nacho Gracia, 10364 Humboldt, Rancho Cucamonga, supported the amendment and stated that he was happy to finally see the density reduced to F.,n appropriate ii level. Commissioner Barker asked if Mr. Gracia understood that the density could come in at 10 with a density bonus for affordable housing. Mr. Gracia replied that he would like to see what that would tz-an on a site plan, since he wa• not sure how that would affect the number of dwellings constructed. There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. - Commissinner MCNiel stated that this was the density which was established as the one most suited for this parcel and was glad to see it finally reduced to that level. Commissioner Chitiea stated that 4 -8 is acceptable and coul, be compatible; however, was concerned with compatibility should the density increase to 10 under a density bonus. Commissioner Rempel was concerned with the development of condominiums or apartmeits in this area of the City.. He stated that this type of product is inherently incompatible with the area due to surrounding uses such as the . school on one side and the railroad on the other; therefore, could not support the amendment. He suggested that the project be developed under the terms of a Development Agreement. 6-1113 Commissioner Sarker agreed that 4 -8 unit, per acre is an appropriate density r» for this parcel'; however, was concerned with developm-at at 10 units per acre -,` under a density bonus. Chairman Stout stated that he had not changed his opinio:a that *28 units per acre is an appropriate density for the,,parcel, He indicated to the devel oper that when the Commission expresses strung_ concerns regarding compatibiliaty at higher than 8 units per, acre this issue will come up in the design phases, therefore strongly i;�ged the applicant to consider this concern .irt. their building program. Comm ".ssioner Chit!ea.askedr- i-f there was a way to tie a developmen ;agreement to the land use amendment. .Mr. Markman replied that a development agreement repisces Zoning not the General Plan desi-gnati0n.; therefore, ct;:ld .nut ba applied to -the land use amendment. Mr. Markman indicated that beforE . -}tis project goes before the' City Council documentation would be necessary to indicate that the people' 'r signing the application are authorized to' control the land use on the property. He advised that if this documentation is not received, it would be necessary for the City Council to continue consideration of this item until it is received_.. MotioA , Moved by McNiei, seconded by Stout, carried to recommend issuance of a Negative pee', ration and adoption of the Resolution approving Environmental Assessm-it Gelerai and Plan Amendment 85 -01A, Hawkins, to the City Council. 'Motic.i carried by a ful1owing voter AYES. COMFtitSYOHERss MCNIEL,!STOUT; BARKER M., NOES: MYR SSIONERS: CHITIEA, REMPEL ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried , In U3 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO'CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT NO. 86 -02 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE DISTRICT DESIGNATION FROM L041 TO LOW - MEDIUM(: OR 13.55 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FERQ`4,'EAST OF ARCHIBALD - APN 209 -055- 02, 03, 14 - WHEREAS, on the 15th day of 3uly, 1986 an application was filed and accepted on the above - described project; and `:.4EREAS, on b?te 13th day of August, 1986, the Planning Commission ,held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 cf the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following i� nnings: 1. That the subject proerty is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and ccmpatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and 2. That the proposed district change would not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and 3. That the proposed district ciiange i,� in conformance with the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this project w17T—not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on August 13, 1986, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hervhv recommends approval on the 13th day of August, 1986, Development District Amendment No. 66 -02, 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Cit;;' Council approve and adopt Development District Amendment No. 86 -02. 3. That a Cert '`ed Copy of this Resolution and related material. h .by adopted by the Planning Commission shall be f,. warded to the City Council.. T 71Ttqr.-77 W APPROMEO 'AND ADOPTVD THIS 13th DAY OF AUCUST, 1986. PLANNING COMISSIPN OF THE CITY bF RANCHO CUCA14ONGA r- BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Ueputy Secretary 1, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the 'City of Rancho Cucamonga, do. hereby certify,that the foregoi-n-9 Resolutiotrwas duly-and regularly introduced, p.,A,%edj, and. adopted by the Plbnnin,g CommissJon of- the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meetimg of the Planning Commission held. on the 13th day of August, 1986, by thh following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMISSIONERS: NOES: COMISSIONERS: ABSENf., COMISSIONERS: I 'Q AMIL"14 rl� � --tal �F DATE: TO: FROM:. A' BY: r SUBJECT: 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT August 13, 1986 Chairman and Members of the planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Dinn Putrino, iLssistart Planner VARIANCE 86 -03 - VINEYARD NATIONAL BANK - A requ:,st to reduce the front yard cE~ ac or a developmer of a 14,000 square foot o,'fice addition to an existin3 4,800 square foot office bui 1 di r,g on 1.44 acres of land within the General Commercial District, iocatPd at the northwest cdrner of Foothill Soul evard and Kiu:.tin Avenue - APN 208- 15 -01 Related File: Development Review 86 -17 I. ANALYSIS: The app icant_ts requesting .a stye. ;, setback reduction o ee along Foothill BLulevardFrom 45 feet (Development Code minimum requirement) to 38 feet. The existing building maintains a 38 foot setback from Foothill Boulevard. The proposed project is designed tc continue the 38 foot setback dryelcuing a cur'inuing straight line addition with enclosed stai.{ i Ys projecting further Into the required setback area. The applicant suggests that the straight line continuation is necess— Y in ordyr to maintain the Integrity of the architectural deign eleeeats of the existing building in the expansion. The proposed design • of the si tt plan 'is limited due to the non- conforming location of the existing buiWng. Maintaining a 45- foot setback in the addition or emolishiry the exist "ng building would preset,, a practical difficulty based upon a strict or literal interpretation of the Development Code objectives. Due to these circumstances, the above limitations prevent the applicant from developing the s!.bject property similar to owners/ ,pplicants of other propertiE, in the same district withrut the limitations. II. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Before granting a Variance, the Planning Cc:rniission s a TTma a the following findings that the circtr.stance; presk,ribed below do apply: A That strict or literal interpret -ate on and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessaty physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this Code. ITEM M ti ai . 1977 PLANNING COMMISSMN STAFF REPORT VARIANCE 86 -03 - VINEYARD NATIONAL BANK Aitg,;s't 13, 1986 .," Page 2 K f 11 B. That there are M4PP iWIal Cr extraordinary circv.1stances or conditions 4pli(,eble. to the property invo7ved or to the intended use cuf the property that do not -nply gen -Nally to other properties in the sane zone. C. That strict or "iteral interpretation and enforcement of tte specified regu'ation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of ether pro; •-ties in t. the sane zone. D. ,.',zt the granting of the Variance wii not constitute a grant of special ''privilege inconsistent with the limitations or• other properties classified in the same zone. E. That the gra+iting of the Variance will not be detrimerita'. to the public .heali;h, silraty, or welfare, or math; ^inlay it orioua to properties or improvements in the vir., -nity. F. t iS staff's detem ,nAtion that the above findings can be made due tr, the 1 `i hi tati ons and, A rcunstances of 'the subj eat property. 'y III. CORRESP=ENCE: This ittn hac be n adver ;t sed as a public nearing in The >rr a or newspaper and all property osiners within 3n0 feet of tie ' sul) ect sits have' been ne-tified. rn addition, public hearing notices ,`. *ave been posted on the subject property. IV. RECOMMENDATIOM: Staff recommends that the Planning Commis ivn approve Varian ce 1:6 -03" through the adoption of the c`4*ached Resolution and conditions of Approval. ke;Bull tfulIy itt , - t Br r City Planner BB:DP:ko Attachments: Exhibit "A" Vic1,; y Ma^ Exhib•;t "L" - Site Ut"I ization Map Exhibit "C Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Elevation Plans Exhibit "Z" Persupctive Pldn Exhibit "F" - Landscape Plans Resol u .i on of Approval with Condi ti ons Zi f 1T [NSA t is YORERtlS ' = xyL t¢ ' W iY .t'•ggWV Rfq J S+IY F:M �1D _..I =Ill tY a► u: Lr a BASE IiNE• , sa�cm®eeyyl� �' »D K "aAi a cum A.� Tj Z [,on:�3 (Rc""h Ai I '� '.9 °.A -f'A A� 5 a aG `C's L T-. ' . ...f « t :Plt R L�'4E A s 0Ga [ } Lf. 0 S T yLq1 a # S'j}� A 5ar r / �/// T - _ 1 T PAKl A l DEV R gi+frU5L ♦ � F f<�2 �. ' .°. . ' _ .rof.A• tfl,Ai 0 . t 0[> q mg> 'f� O' Y w '' Q a xro Pz �Enw3LP £YoG TE4 U R( � i-`R°. sT.♦ jF . r iS F �T.3w � . � 4 Y �d€4 n w�Y a ' ^E 4 '.•�3 IV,".YaM Nw GV ST st Polk PAt MMmoo, 4; +�r K . ` ., 'SL U p 9ryT ' �ny i r` G at •Fr �t t Fs ` . 5 .a . y ° O " .a °° a " • ` fi c F t v. .• : aCAt yg !W ,q,Lf�Pi£ «•nw ve a ST c FF" ). �• Ad Y \fry . � 2F' T d -wEwru :i T` v < Mz z Nq✓W1'E� ' .4 , °, ° CHURCH St 2' �, 4f'.L,`H ST F A, CF4URC4S z<...� . $T.. ¢y ` U ¢• . y oA NOS TON t y�tauGat°rcR @� x {t ' ,� CNES.iCEi ryyp� SL prownl igia s m i g a w a= fL $ N>'gAA° »E t K s< '�` x . 8 0 �'t f r �o• �v � ���:,' 4j fl cr c RR HEMLQCKd sr > 'L�T•i ry.M2-.5La<� IP4�e'. /SMid4 .i. x 4 O y W ! C AS �r C tt n "� s 'Y S NORWK.KS, i N TOWN EF-Eq ,!C L� rq r p P n's taai rH. A`kK W Y$� ` -',l �fu o 'w TA a r DORSET SL S 'hp9L� CI Q'rS'aF:av .O J. y''+ PoN dace ! r t ? .AOwiy°S. �s Ar Saoatgsx TGwe 9 p ea+e HE� a . • MJ9nE TA CSA Tt.KJAST CNHK µslnwy CCCryryry IT •a -F-00 IL -z r ,TOMES ^iVO,T ,ns.' a x 1. `°< FOOTHILL c 4:,ma: ti.am-< l � ,6� l E•::'[:O RpR'W tam f, T 1t ,j° AMPS»IFIL V JL .SHIRES T. MOtlxE _HAMPSHLRE'Si. LV ~ y, LAUREL 'fOE'.E ti .'MFt'SA Ct bRtSFAp tx #- _ p� s ¢' rs > De HOMES. MME5 f a[arr N LL��1 . O I Sk22 �c ON S ----------- � +4P. �.ai ttt+,pt EutEA DF ON ST, t° y G �-'� O erx Grc I x < R15E ST at R N09R£ j CAIC L\1 7 ONQA HOMES L _ WEM '�L H 5 K DGEA AuRlgN wt R w GALE VEdAN .p ST- iEm J�pjy� _ L, nraAPROW X YS '*Wt. ALHgE - ,�RRpW ROUT 5 ..PROW ROUTEI i j � E1 r •�m �£t y���yI f &CENTEfE < um b ZIT' CODE PoLEWac.p Oft �_- LINAS . fa � c o iSTtq:KiLY 0 7l 3, ... u I ° $T SC 9Tf[ 5T C . vela Sflc ST .;-Alm K14(Ei.. ST... ZETN 5T ERA ; 2 1 •+•yiT E1L D, C+KSTd+P Fet£G�T E C'r..✓:1ux1J YePS£Y e t W A5 �o.NC1R PL ,WTAAKLWE Al . SANTA - RR. j�n sx HBOIC:T AY .. Rm A, `d 5 5TH } r Q _ $T. ?_ BwR 1 rt LLanrr 1 Aae+atif � �y�'ia� 1 'y SC > SL 1 ACACiA � sr. O scAi i. •a � < i I sr• �.ASt� I _ 3 � TrH sT TTH � T t t, EUELw • - jj< i ST e $t MIOH 9E��311. ut to D ReR00 %ST. EPMn� SHARON CIS p 1�s M AOow sT -3 C ETEt ST. ��r. ETVE 6" St T x !6 N y< W 14 yy 0 ¢ 2 N w a IIE4 -- Of[ t STH AT - S • CRES;UCENEER0 5S" ' 6T. jO T f im p $ ; w "o," 'ORTH CITY Or. ITEM. th. RAINCHO CUCAN10 : U c ° PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT. 'E 11 SCAL& • 177 f sr A 2 m — .r�� f/ g r \ I Fim i I - --- T $1 LE F�YLY IIEIIO � � 7.,ppt i }UC ti fAYLTJIISq.n.'E!' BAN DER AD1k0 RD. I f i CiuR I� y 6Vi p.. 1 I rmull1CA YRRR. I fiutlii 1m+7 1 I 1 4 WCANT — I j PROJECT Y Fill] ❑;a ❑� 'i 1, i E I SO4E 1= , I171K (I YLT PCs Me jl di I T FOOTHILL 9LVV \ w ssSVIY I ( Ij �� f w \ I._ 11"IT t It erorr,xc cwrex t / i SITE UTILIZATION MAP NORT, CITY Off' 1 ATCHO CUC AMONGA TIME: �- i Pi.ANi rI�;�C DI.VISIG N EXHIPIT: _ILL i FAb" ! t I I R tK CeK�K o =01.� ba • y tl:YJ r �1 -O0.— •<. �:_L�O -.� —. ... L♦� -eft. m; VROPOSE52 } � 2ND FLOO 4 vj O ADDITKOW 1 I iU E.MISTINC S & a N e 700' TNILL SEND. NORTH CITY OF RANCHO CUC:A1VI0 \TGA ITCH [: �r� �/� - � `7 _ TITLE:—f:jI PLANNING DIVISIOLN EXHII3[T: NMI Fq Ir fl tj .1j. wi, alit Fq w Ir w � 0 i c s a e s a( e i l CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPING PLAN a C NORTH CITY OF - ITE \I: D RAINCHO CUCATMO 'GA TITu -: _�a��� PLANNING DIVISION EXIiiBIT- " L SCALE:�lr5 4 .r RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANC "I, CUCAMONGA APPROVING A REQUEST FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A VHh.ANCE, NO. 86 -03, TO ALLOW A REDUCTION OF- THE MINIMUM STREET SETBACK WITHIN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL ' DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST C0 1£R OF FOOTHILL 'R BOULEVARD AND KLUSMAN AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AND.MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF C A. Recitals, (i) VINEYARD NATIONAL BANK has filed an application for the y issuance of a Variance, No. 86-03, described above in the title for this �t Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject variance request is referred to as "the application' (ii) On August 13, 1986, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the subject matter of the application, and said public hearing was concluded prior to the adoption of this Resolution. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the planning Commissions of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: I. This Commnission hereby specifically finds that all of the fact, set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered-in compliance with the California Environnental Quality Act of 1970 and further finds and concurs with the N- .sAtive Declaration adopted with respect to this project on August 13,•1986. 3. Based upon aeabstantial evidence presentee to this Ccmmission during the above - referenced August 13, 1986, hearing, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Con;mi:.sion hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to "property located at tht~ northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Klusmar. Avenue, consisting of approximately 1.44 acres imd is currently improved with a office /bank facility; b. Tile m operti es to the north, south, east, and west of -the subject site are presently designated for commercial uses and are currently developed; PLANNING COMISSION RESOLUTION NO. VARIANCE 86 -03 - VINEYARD NATIONAL DANK August 13, 1986 Page 2 C. The application is designed to facilitate the development of a 14,000 square foot office adcition to an existing 4,800 square foot building on said 1.44 acres of and and has been submitted in conjunction with a request for the approval of Development Review 86 -17 (approved August 13, 1986). Such an action as contemplated, in conjunction with the application, conforms to the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and is a permitted use within the General Commercial District; d. The application has been submitted to allow a reduction in the minimum street setback, contrary to the requirements of Section 17.10.0408 of the Rancho Cucamogna Development Code requiring lots within the General Commercial District to have a setback of a minimum forty -five (45) feet; a., The •�iariance as specified in the application will not contradict the goals or objectives of the Rancho Cucamonga General Pian or Development Code and will not prcmote a detrimental condition to the persons or property ^n the immediate vicinity of the subject site for the reasons as follows: 4 M It is the pal:icy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to minimize the adverse effects of the development process. The subject site contains a legal non - conforming structure. The strict requirement of street setbacks on the subject site would prevent the applicant/owner fron developing the subject property similar to owners or other properties in the same district without the subject limitations; Is j (ii) At the above - referenced August 13, 1985, public hearing, no public testimony w.-,s set forth in opposition to the application. 4. Based upon the substantial evidence present;d to this Commission during the above - referenced August 13, 1986, public hearing, and upon the specific findings of fact set forth in paragraphs 1, 2,'• and 3, above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as f,511ows: a. The strict; or literal interpretation aW enforcement of the specified r.?gu1'ation would result in a practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship incon;,istent with the objectives of the Development Code; b. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved, or to the intended use of the property, that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district; c. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified reg,lation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoye� by owner,, of other propert? es in the same district; d. The granting of the subject Variance will not constitute a s;Et,ial privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the so-me district; and e. The granting of the subject Variance will not be Aetrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 21. PLANNING COIaA % (on t SL1i UPI iON CIO. VARIANCE 8 a' :1fIKtE'LARD NAIONAlBANK August 13, 198 Page 3 5. Variance No. 86-03 is approved Subject to -the followin conditions: a. The _ anti ty and' uuality of landscape mat°teri:al s to, be used along Foothill Bou' Aida d stree`tseaape shall be., :�ncreasod to btal ance the reduction of landsc�,,i ng. bet nfl ed l ardscape ar d rFri gati on plans' 'shall be submiti.::d for revive, w and approval by the City Planner prior to issuance of _:71xding pc:tjits, 6. Based upon the findin4,s and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 5 above, the °Gcxmassion hereby approves "the application. 7. The Secretary to this Gcmatissiun shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED l'HIS 13TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1586. PLANNING COMMISSIOi! OF TNEC'�TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. SIdut, Ch,41 a— n ATTEST: Brad u er` epu,;y Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Camlissit,>iz of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do "hereby certify that the foregoing Resrluiio� was duly and regularly i ntrodhced, passed, and adopted by the Planning CMMissi on of the City of Rancho, Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the 'Planning Coamission held on the 13th day of August, 1986, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS:. NOES: COMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 'I �k ifl I: DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: Vl l i Vl' uAl`I VIl{,/ v v vntrli%J,'I vL'S C13CA.& & io ST—U ` REPORT < f K � r w T o C F � Z U b August 13, 1986 Chairman end Members of the Panning C=ission Brad Buller, City Planner Alan Warren, Associate Planner REVISION!, OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN - CITY OF CUCiVICiW' 7— n accor anc-e ra Section b5450 an 65500 of the California favernment.Code, a revision to the City of Rancho Cucamongti r Industrial Area Specific Plan (originally adopted in 1981) hits been prepared and is available for public view at the City offices. The draft docunent has received an approval' recommendation from the Planning Ccmmission on June 25, 1Si6. Tho purpose of this is to reconsider Research a LAeveicpment uie stsndar�s and the potential of authorizing Research & Development uses along Haven Avenue within the Industrial Area Specific Plan. I. ABSTRACT: The City Council has requested that the Planning Co m iii s son reconsider the following Research & Development provisions of the recently approved draft revisions to the Industrial Area Specific Plan. A. Alternative land use type definitions thereby a :ininating I separate land use category for Research & Development. S. Provisions to allow for Research & Development uses in a limited form in the Haven Overlay District. II. BACKGROUND: On 4uly 2, 1986, the City Council, at the request of local d eve opers, discussed the issue of allowing Research & Development uses with ;; the Haven Overlay District, Althougi the City Council has not yet far:na,ly reviewed the drat `. revisions to the Industrial Arca Specific Plan (I.S.P.), public input was presented which requested a greater degree of Research & Development uses on Haven Avenue. The Council was generally receptive to tie concept or a limited scope of R & D uses along Haven, but some Council members voiced concern ovar the concept of Research & Development as a defined !%e within the ',.S.P. and the Haven overlay District. Council direction ws to request re -study of the mole issue of Research & Development uses on Haven, consider alternative land use type ITEM N 5 def i ni ti on;i and provisions fer Research & Development acti,r ti es. These issu!as are discussed in this report. III. DISCUSSION, Staff has drafted an alternative (Alternative A) pura�uanL to City Council directior which provides for Rciearch & O evel opment activities under office and industrial type- l and uses. This framework does not recognize Research & Development as a distinct and separate land use, but as a function of various internally related activities. Specifically, this framework- prt,%Ides for Research & Development uses under the definitions aiod zoning provisions for professional and design offices with industrial laboratories and light manufacturing. The recently approved Research & Development land use framework is enclosed for comparison. In addition, this alternative does provide for a limited research sawvice activities within the Haven Overlay District in the form of a 20i accessory/ancillary use allowance. This method would .41l ow for a business with minor accessory /ancillary uses, whir „h in themselves are not authorized as principal uses, to locate on Haven Avenue without the necessity of special permits, so long as the fi rm ` s pri nci pal use i s authorized wi the n th.,_ district. Alternative B is the modification of the approved Research & Development format with similar provisions for accessory /ancillary uses. Each alternative also provides a range of R & D use allowances. A brief analysis of the pros and cons of each range step is rroviaed Wth each example for comparison. Also incluand with Alternative A are suggested development standards for inclusion into the Haven Overlay District. These have been formulated to preserve the office environment of the corridor. The new passages are shown in bold. If the Commission concludes Research & Developaent uses should be allowed along Maven Avenue, it would be appropriate to include the development standards as drafted. IV. ANALYSIS: It is recognized that recent City land use policy for Haven en A nue strongly encourages high -tech office development as a prestigious entry into the City. Also, requests have come from the development committee to allow for limited Research & Development uses along this major entry into the City. Staff favors the limited accessory /ancillary use approach. This method would permit allowed principal uses (offices) to have minor accessory operations within their facility. Staff does have concerns, however, with any proposal which goes beyond this stage. Speci ?1 permits (C.U.P.s, etc.) to extend or modify minimum use and development standards by satfafying special All— i w requirements can only further "muddy" the district ideniity and put'pose. Staff believes that the uses and development standards should set a distinct tor- of development. if the community wishes Haven Avenue to bo a ce:4ral office, district, the use limitations and development standards 5rould be strong indication of that policy. The dilu'tnig 0 that p'ail'osophy will only aide in diluting the area's pPrceiv•,d image. A change in the policy could, however be reflected in a Lhange in land use and development standards in which a Researdr & Development corridor could become an integral part of the district identity. k In refs ;rds to 'the deletion of Resdarch & Development as a land us type, staff brelieves the suggested alUrnati've has some positive aspects. Firstly, it recognizes the true nature of Research & Development as being a combination of office and industrial I research activities and separates these as individual uses. This, s staff feels, allows for- a greater degree of use aontrc3 ari use fl exi bi l i t; within the land use allowance provisions. 7his , framework should work well ti;roughout the Industrial Area Sper fic Plan. Staff can r1erceive difficulties in use questions w=th the Res /larch & Development use framework when combined wit4 perce'ptage limitations or Conditional Usgf PC'vits for various d�fice activities. White Office and R & D Office uses are fully d4ined in the approved revised I.S.P., staff feels that there are potential similarities oetween the two use types which could confuse the questions of conditionally permitted R & O office uses in conjunction with permitted professional office uses. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends *-Al, the Planning Commission 1 avora q con -Mer limiting R & D uses along Haven Avenue solely acce sor,y /ancillary use'provistons as drafted in Exhibit 1. At this level or R & D al7owatice, either the Research & Development Y j framewol ^k or the Office - ramework should be workable within the existing and propot'd development standards. However, staff prefers the Office land use types framework and would recommend its adoption into the Industrial Area Specific Plan. 4R5,51cltlul`�` ml ted, Brad Buller' City Planner BB:AW: ko V-13 ANALYSTS OF ALTERNATE A OFFICE PROFESSIONAL, DESIGN,, R,SZMCH FORMAT ALLWANCE OF R r. a 1111 P11111111AL 0E11GN. li* GARCK 14ANUFAC79RING Administrative 'oT,tr ON HAVEN Offines Oqsiqn Sarvicos Research Services MarviQcttjri2j 1. N... Permitted Permitted Not Permitted Clot P*!rmitted Allowance (Does not provide any avenue for user with minor accessary u,&es to request authorization to ocate on Hav,n. Does ensure only professional and related tonnercial uses for the corridor). Z. Minimum Actessory"Use ;Allowance P rmittad Permitted Permitted 20% Not Permitted (Provbos limited flexUllity for research services jlabs) to locate on Haven. This furmat allows for a simple activity allowing tracking with little or ro abig-jities for interpretation. (i.e. profes:sional office and research services are listed as separate )jses). Revisal standards to implew4nt this provision are contained in Exhibit 1.) ft-imum Accessory Use Allowance Permitted to 20% w/possible Accessory to SV. Expansion Permitter' Permitted with C.U.P. , Not Permitted (Allows for the potential, ;ub: 'ntial Research & Development far ties. Yhis oition and framework wool. )imit debate to the appropriate de&..e of Research & Development on a case-by- case basis) 4, Minimal to r.U.P. 0% to Maximum fe-mitted "rmitted 100% Not Permitted tAllows for the potential of -ibstantial Research & De-ielcyoment .-ilities. This optior and ,ramework would limit debate to 'tbe appropriate degree of Research & Levelopme-It on a ca.•e-by-case basis. 100% Research & D,vflopment is possible.) S. Maximum pe-mitted Permitted Pcrmitted Not Permitted (This option can -TfiecVvely change the maJor deVelo :!,-,nt them. along lia,,cn to lle5earch 4 Development. Revearch 11 Oevebpment would be allowed as a matter of risht.) IU_ Al 0.1 w , �: ��° 9 „4� ' ALTERYsrs OF x RESEARCH b DEVELOPMEN'`,TORMAT* ” ALLOWANCE OF R b D RESEARCH &DEVELOPMENT COMMERCIAL rte` ON HAVEN Office -- — Professions Admin. Manufacturing - Services Office - ---- �"' 1• No Allowance Not Permitted Not Permitted Permitted Permitted (Does not provide any avelue for user With minor accessory uses to request authorization to locate on Haven. i Does ensure only professional and related commercial uses for the f ` corridor.) 2. Minimum Allowance Accessory mitted to Per- Not Permitted Permitted Permitted 20% ip i (Provides limit -,d flexibility for design uses with laboratories to locate on Haven: Some confusion and area allowance difficulties with r similar activities in Research & Development /Office and Professional Services,) ;-A 3. Minimum A'.iowance Accessory mitted to Per - Not Permitted Peratted Permitted 20% w /Pos_ible Accessory to 509 Expansion w /C.u.p, (Allows for the potential e " substantial Research & Develop:.anw facilities on Haven. Under this option, further debate over Research & Development /Office verses Professional Services is highly possible for large Research & Development uses which approach the 50% level.) 4. Minimal to Conditional Not Permitted Permitted P jrmitted Use Permit Maximum 0% to 100% (This Option allows for major Research & Development facilities subject to satisfying all design standards and C.U.P. requirembnts. Discretionary action would generally be limited to performance and development standards and not necessary to land use.)* 5. Maximum Permitted Not Permitted Permitted Permitted (This option can effectively change the major development theme altng Haven to Research & Development. Research & Development would be w aliowe¢ as a matter of right.) .. �` t t Section 6 of Table III =2, Land Use Types Definitions should be amended in total as follows Administrative and Office and Professional Services should be deleter4 from r the Coamerd al bse Types Section: B. PROFESSIORM,_DESIGN AND RESEARCH OFFICE,:USZ* Administrative and Office: Activities typically include, but are no�c 7m1 to: erecutive management, adainistrative, or clerical uses of private, profit orientated'fIrms other than public utility firms. Uses typi cal iy i ncl ude, but are not limited to: corporate headquarters, branch offices, and data storaga centers, E , Professional. /Desi gn "Ces: Activities typically ' r i nc I c► es, but are m t ted to: the provision of advice, design, information, or consultatij% of a ` processional nature. Uses typically include, but are not limitzd to architects, engineers, lawyers, and accountant offices, and a planning or educational k research services. Uses may include advertising offices and work activities. Research Services: Activities typically include, but are no ,m, to: research, sign, analysis and deve:opment, and/or testing of a product; activities typically include, but are not limited to. testing laborataries, acoustical chambers, wind tunnels, and main frame computer services. Such uses do not promote odors, noise, vibration, or particulates widch would adversely affect uses in the save structure or on the same site. .hanges TABLE 111 -1 should be amendedf2 l Ly ¢ 7LC a$ +nd"cated. Exhibit I ` 1 H i {i" SUMMARY LAND USE TYPE SY SUSAREA • PERMITTED USE It CONDnIONALLY PERMfrTL''D U &E N07E:Ncra- marked Uses Not Permitted USE TYPES Land Use*, jP GI GI GI GI GI IP IP GI GI GI IP GI GI HI F P Subareas MANUFACT1jRWG HO 1 2 S 4 S 6 7 8 9 10 1 1 12 1314 1$ t Custom .�.._..,.:�.: .:y .. . � Light - :-Medium _l . _ Heavy - • • • • % • • • e • _ • • • w o • o �C ® • e • • • i ` • • ® e a_ • e • - • • w _ MI i Im a t H v OFFIC OFESSIONAL, DESIGN &RESEARCH ® •- • 'Administrative and Office • Professkmal/Uesign Services.. '' Res arch Services WHO TQ A _,DISTRIBI o • IC yt qi % % • a • c x % % • • % • x w • It e % e -• e Public Storage tight .^,= ., ".'�.. .__ .hMedium _ r eavy , ^� •.-� OMMERCIAL 3c ® Y. ' {P. 't • •_ % k IB a ®s �L.• _ — • e _ • e • aS ♦•� 1C • % e • ~ uiturat/t4ursery Supplies & Services tnal Care ufnmative Fleet Storage " - [Automotive Rentai iLeasing utomothre/Light Truck Repair morM utomotive /Light Truck Repair-Major utomotive Sales Automotive Service Station BuilhgContractoes -Offices P, is s Buldng Contractor's Storage yard r Bruld ng WrItenance Services . > �,= Pqding : iuphting Equipment Supplies &Sales B- Business $uppty petal & Services -Bu Su <: . pport SO ICe3 'Communication Serir -es = . ;" :: Convenience Sales & Services E�tirg Enterta5tment Extensive linaac -" "� Lomre�rcial ~' Fast Food Soles financial, h�s[aance,�and steal Estate Sjervices Food & Beverage Sales - Funeral artcl Ceemetnry Services dry Heavy Equipment Sales & Rentals "RPtel/Motel "_ - Laundry Services _ ' Personal lice Services Care _Services � r . ems,. Personal Services Petroleum Products Storage - '- _• ". - -'Recreationai Facilities Repair Services Scrap operation Cavlc _. , . 1: - y x- ®` jZ X IF ® • ,n I< x it • x s a IC % - % �i -- — A % % IC _ 3c' X ?t U !C % x% . Id jt e _ . • _ _w' Ie % x s • • • e . • • % % - s : -� % X % • e x .s - % x% .r" % •, •` i a _ x -x I It % _ � : e: • _ n • 's: • - • w y ` x s- g _ . x ®_ X • _•: Y _a x ® _ a �% .y. • •wy: x s - g x . ®, ,. % ® • • 9� % `e % % • & - ' .- e •. x bt IC Vii; % • �, % K '- �5 % -- x ® ,x 1C X x �N ?t :. % .? %, 'x; • , - % w,, _ !C '* __r x >< ,� % s, gf ° ,9C % x % St k s; x x s s - x % s L- % % e - � ®. v. x , • ;s, a .- e - w % 3C ,� '�C a _. aj i =_ •' - :. Administrative Civic Services _ Cultural ", Flood ControVUtiiity Condor 6Gc assembly public Safety & Utlity Services ReFgTous Assembly --_�_• , ems` " ^�: ` :"' k HO-Haven Park GI- General HO -Haven nvp_ n�adao n�t,�.: _ ., IG ys >G >e % ?t 9i % x Industrial if- � • % k MVHI- •. It • it Mnimturr . � NMdust,,j �; y X ert P act Heavy Mdustrial �.: K %' % !t 9t ?� x ' EXHIBIT I ,` Section F should be added to Table 1II -2, Land Use Types Definitions F. NEIM USE TYPES AccessoryjAnct`11ary Use: The use curtwarily an or aceesrsory tr,the principal use of the- laid. , bail di ng ,,s a te, busi tf-iss acti�ri tyy or to A. , building or other structs.*rq� l ocatod on the 'sane 5 , boil di "ng sz to as;' the pri nci pl a use.' An - accessory use rich is custmarily" subocdinate'in functions and; in ' area req�i resents to � the pa i ncpa7. use or buil4ti:ng site Y else Serve an, aijcillary function as.yan # ?irrir ®gal_ essentiPal, and inseparable part,,of, the- principle use, building sife, s`-,ructure orr pertitin thereof. Principal Use: A. use which fulfills a primary function an es ,ishment, business, institution, or ®t her entity. A principal us¢ oecLfi4 the largest si ngl e segaent of the activity funotlons or area requirements F of a level- opment. r Section G should be added to Table III -2, Land Use Types Definitions S. Research and Development Uses The Specific Plan provides for activities of Research Zid - Development projects by authorizing specific activities /uses typically associated with that type of operation. Those activities are listed and defined under the Professional Design and Research Office land use type. Research and Development projects are appropriate for those subareas in which the combination of the three i ndfyi dual office uses may be authorized. For Research and Development projects on Haven Avenue, 'refer to Haven Overlay District provisions for Professional Services uses and accessory use allowances. i ,v -q 7 771' EXHIBIT I The following changes should be made to the Haven Avenus t =vrelay District portion of the I.S.P.: 8.5 Accessory /Ancillary Use Rest riciionr i he purpose of the- section to set maxftp devel opment prbvtsions for accessory /ancillary uses Which are not . normally permitted in the Haven Overlay ,District . "The The following , Provisions shall appl-e in the Haven Overlay District: i 8.5.1. Accessory, /ancillary uses not listed as permitted 'or conditionally permitted uses* are limited to 2Di of the total - building or business area. B.5.2. Accessory /Ancillary uses must be located within main * bqi l.,di ngs housing permitted principal uses. Ho outtbor accessory /ancillary uses are permitted. 8.5.3. No accessoryhncillary manufacturing uses are permitted in the Haven Overlay District. Only uses defined and listed in Table I11-2, Land Use 7y�e Definitions can be considered as cce— ssor- ancillary, `uses. Ar The following sentence should be added tc the end of Section G.5: The design of loading doors shall be consistent with office architectural design features. All building equipment must be housed within the building or below finished grade. All equipment screening must b architecturally integrated into the overall office building design. The following sentence should be added to the beginning of Section G.6.: Within the Overlay District, ali building features must exhibit an office style architecture regardless of the type of accessory /ancillary uses or equipment contained within the building or or the site. N -rQ irl P.C. approved i.S SUMMITRY L %ND USE TYPE BY SUBAREA rev sions • PERMITTED USE K CONDtTlONALLY PERMrrrrD USE NOTE: Non-marked Uses N t P O X X M n C r� Gi 0 Z 1-0 ,.D 6 _C �. O r� N O USE TYPES Land Use IP Gi 71 GI GI'G1 IP IP GI GI GI !P GI 0 ICA ormM., II P < j AAANU FACTURING, Subareas !HO 1 2 3 4 5 6 71 81 9110 91 12 1314 15 16 Cu•lorn Light r,• • a • • ', r • Medium • W. • x • e • o • • i c s e • • Heavy _ % • • Minin In GT ect Heavy RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT Office Research /Design e Ligirt Mmrvf 8cb"M % • % x • x c • WHOLESALE,STORAGE,DISTRIBUTION • • 'e • s • ;- x , . •. x Public Storage Light 1t % • % % c • % x -• Medium �'' x • Al J • - • :'•. • 0 • % • • • e e • e _Heavy UUTAMERCIAL e ' Administrative and Office Agdc>>reuraV lursery Supples & Services • % >t X • • x x • Si >S • s x Aninai Care • x - ® • . . a. Automotive Fleet Storage >< x Automotive Rental /Leasing ® 0 ~' AutomottvWLlyht Truck Ropair -Minor x 0u x • x x • 9C x 1p Automotive /Light Truck Repair -Major . % e fit: • Automotive Salsa • ., x • • % Automotive Service Station BuldingContractor's OfflceY &Yards x ?t % 1 % x 9t x jt % �t % ! x x Bugling Contractor's Storage Yard , M e '— Building Malttenance Services • 13uilr!9 & Lighting Equipment Supplies &Sales • • •',_ x !t ! : ® v' ® • Business Supply Retal s & Service • .•: o • • • • x ® � � • Business Support Services .e ; ,, ® O Comrm 4katlon Services r • e o x • e 0 0. o % x • • • • It • �» Convenience Sales & Services •' • • Eating & Drinking Estabf hments • • • - • 1C x 9t % x X ?t x 9t % �I Entertainment 1 • • ® • • Extensiv trrpaot Commercial K - , :t x It Fast Food Sales Fhanciaiy insurance, and Real Estate Services % s % x x Food & Beverage Sales •; % x x ty 7 ?" a Funeral and Clstory Services em x:. x M .x X R% x% k aK x x x x Tz Heavy Equipment Sales & Rentals X x M— x °? - Z Hote~ei x x x x e Laundry Services • - ® .. :: �. MedicaVHealth Care Services Persona! Services • • • • s Petrcierrrn Prodvcta Stocaga at Professional Services • -.x 3C x Recreational Facilities Repair Services x `! 7t a • x • • at • ® e • • Scrap Operation ! • % • • • • i e • ?t I 1C Admhletrattve CWo Services • • • x , % • x Cultural EXtenatrr0 y tnpacttJtilft Facilities f � �; x X k • Fred ControVUtitity Coridor s o e • x Public Assembly Public Safety & Utility Services At - . x •+ x e . • . o . • Relgtosra Assemt ty >e x x % x k 9L x x % k Jr % 1t It x % x 9C % y� x 6 O- industrial Park GI-General hdustria .L -Haven Ave. OvPr4w ❑�t.tr+ ! ,s, MV . -. - 9C mrrnurrt tnpact Heavy industrial ".j P.C. approved I.S.P. revisions TABLE III -2 LAND USE TYPE DEFINITIONS Uses shown in 'fable III -I are defined as follows. A. MANUFACTURING USE TYPES Custom Manufacturing: Activities typically include, but riot limited to; manufacturing, processing, assembling, packaging, treatment, or fabrication of custom made products. These types of business establishments Jo not utilize raw materials for their finished products, but rather, may utilize °semi- finithed" type 'k of manufactured materials for their custom mane to,�- ol,der products. The finished products fr.,om these bi;sinesz,establishments are ready for use or t' d r7 Lt� cansump on an .ma.).;;��nclude on. -site wholesale and retai i f -1-1, d _ `-t _,J o e gao s p,g•uc . ,-Ach uses may include, but are not limited to: j__Flry ;.household i' Ytiture; art objects; - apparel products-, small i .,uments: (musical, electrical or photographic), statiov_P,,, and related products: signs and advertising displays stained glass products; leather products; and assembly of bicycle parts. The uses do not prod %ce odors, noise, vibration, or particulates which would adversely affect uses in the same ystruture or on a same site. Where 24 hour on -site surveillance is necessary, a caretaker residence rnav,.he permitted when approved by a Conditional Use Perdit. Light Manufacturing: Activities typically include, but not limited to, research & development ,laboratories, labor intensive manufacturing, assembly, fabrication or repair processes which do not involve large container truck traffic or the transport of large scale bulky products, but may include limited rail traffic. The new product may be finished in the sense that it is ready fcr use or consumption or it may be semi- finished to become a crwonent for further assembly and packaging. These types of business establishments are customarily directed to the ' wholesale market, interplant transfer rather than the direct sale to the consumer. Such uses may include, but are not limited to: electronic microchip assembly; printing, publishing and allied industries; candy and oth confectionery products; bottle, canned soft drinks, and carbonated water; apparel and other finished products; paper board containers and boxes; drugs; small fabricated meal products such as hand tools, general hardware, architectural and ornamental metal work toys, amusement, sports, and athletic goods. The activities do not produce odors, noise, vibration, or N IC tit ✓ ix f� r7 Lt� cansump on an .ma.).;;��nclude on. -site wholesale and retai i f -1-1, d _ `-t _,J o e gao s p,g•uc . ,-Ach uses may include, but are not limited to: j__Flry ;.household i' Ytiture; art objects; - apparel products-, small i .,uments: (musical, electrical or photographic), statiov_P,,, and related products: signs and advertising displays stained glass products; leather products; and assembly of bicycle parts. The uses do not prod %ce odors, noise, vibration, or particulates which would adversely affect uses in the same ystruture or on a same site. Where 24 hour on -site surveillance is necessary, a caretaker residence rnav,.he permitted when approved by a Conditional Use Perdit. Light Manufacturing: Activities typically include, but not limited to, research & development ,laboratories, labor intensive manufacturing, assembly, fabrication or repair processes which do not involve large container truck traffic or the transport of large scale bulky products, but may include limited rail traffic. The new product may be finished in the sense that it is ready fcr use or consumption or it may be semi- finished to become a crwonent for further assembly and packaging. These types of business establishments are customarily directed to the ' wholesale market, interplant transfer rather than the direct sale to the consumer. Such uses may include, but are not limited to: electronic microchip assembly; printing, publishing and allied industries; candy and oth confectionery products; bottle, canned soft drinks, and carbonated water; apparel and other finished products; paper board containers and boxes; drugs; small fabricated meal products such as hand tools, general hardware, architectural and ornamental metal work toys, amusement, sports, and athletic goods. The activities do not produce odors, noise, vibration, or N IC tit ✓ N-I�e7l P.C. approved I.S.P. revisions particul.4tes which woOd adversply affec�,'other uses in the Istr �ture or on the same si�e,. Re�e 24 hour on- site so veillance is ncessary, a car��takerls residence may be 'permitted ,!hen approved by a Conditional Use Permit. Medium Manufacturinq Activities typically include, 6ut not limited to, manufacturing, compounding of materials, processing, assembly, packaging, treatment or fabrication�of materials and products which -equire frr--4uer%t large container truck traffic or rail traffic, or the transport of heavy, h0ky items. The new products are sami-finished to be a component for further manufacturing, fabrication and assembly. These types of business establishments are custrmarily directed��to inter-plant transfer, or to order from industrial uses, rather than for direct sale to the dwiestic consumer. Such uses may include, but not limitedL to.* canned food; tentile products; fq—,.. re and fixtures; converted paper and paper board products; plastir products made From purchased rubber, plastic or resin; fabricated metal, pmducts made from metals; electrical and electronic machiiiery,(,,�"N�,-ii-pmen't's and supplies; office, computing and accounting machines. -Activities may produce roise, idors, vibration!:, illumination or particulates that affect the persons residing in or conducting business in the, vicinity. Where 24 hour on-site surveillance is necessary, a caretaker's reside�qe may be permitted when approved by a Conditional Use Permit. Minimum Impact Heavy Marufacturing: Activities typically include but not limited to: manufacturing, compounding oil material, piucessing, assembly, packaging, treatment, or fabrication, activities which may have frequent rail or truck traffic or the transportation of heavy large �cale products. Activities in this area may gener;.,,�e noise, odor, vibration, illumination, or particulates which may be obnoxious or offensive to persons residing or 0 nducting busin th ikcall nc S. meta 30 ab 00 sto r vac s area ari uses which require massive F" Octures outside of buildings such as cranes or conveyor systems or unscreened open air storage of large quantities of raw, semi-refined, or finished products. Where 24 hours on- site surveillance is necessary, a caretaker's residence may be permitted when approved by a Conditional Use Permit. N-I�e7l .C, approved I.S.P. revisions - e i :a 16ayy ManufacturinR k�tivitles typically include but snot limited to: mal,,gfa q° oring, comenunding of material, processing, assemtiJ) , packaging, treatment, or fabrication. Activities, in this area may have frel'aent, rail or truck traff k; and the transportation of hear large scale products. Activities is this area may generate noise, odor, vibration, illumination, or particulates which may be obnoxious "or offensive to persons residing in or conducting business in the vicinity, Characteristics of use activities permitted within .,is area may include massive structures outside of builL'ings such as cranes, conveyor systems, cooling towers or unscreened open air storage of large quantities of raw, semi- refined or finished products.. Uses typically include but are not limited to: vehicular assembly plants, power plants, concrete product manufacturing activities, batch plants, scrap yards, air melding foundaries`,, and aggregate or asphalt yards. Where 24 hours and surveillance. is necessary, a caretaker's residence may be permitted when approved by a Conditional Use Permit, Research & Development /Light Manufacturing: Activities typically include, but are not limited to; production and assembly operations such as circuit board assembly rooms, and other facilities associated with high technology manufacturing. , The uses' do not produce odors, noise, vibration, paRr-d as 'B�'1 � or particulate which would adverseijr aftec't uses in the same structure or on the same site. Where 24 hours on- site surveillance is necessary, a caretaker's residence may be permitted when approved by el,, Conditional Use Permit. ff -s fj� - B. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT USE TYPES 01 Office Research /Design: Activities typically include, but are not limited to research, design, analysis, development, r and /or testing of a product; k characteristics of use activities perr-`; by this definition may include "clean rooms", laboratories, compater facilities, acoustical chambers, :nd wind tunnels. Such uses have less general office activity than typical office uses, but more intense manufacturing activities than "traditional industrial space. The uses do not produce odors, noise, vibration, or particulates which would adversely affect uses in the same structure or on the same site.. ` Research & Development /Light Manufacturing: Activities typically include, but are not limited to; production and assembly operations such as circuit board assembly rooms, and other facilities associated with high technology manufacturing. , The uses' do not produce odors, noise, vibration, paRr-d as 'B�'1 � or particulate which would adverseijr aftec't uses in the same structure or on the same site. Where 24 hours on- site surveillance is necessary, a caretaker's residence may be permitted when approved by el,, Conditional Use Permit. ff -s fj� - 2 E nrm <r n vii i. vi' aocu�vlly vUVt11Y1V1Y 4 ^li G���FO STAFF REPORT 0 Oyu Fi h VI tl- DATE: August 13, 1986 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dino Putrino, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 66 -17 - e devel opmen of a,14,000' square toot o ice a ition to an existing 4,800 sq. ft. building nn 1.44 acres of land within thr• General Can-ercial District located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulsard and Klusman Avenue:- APN: 708- 15 -01. RELATED FILE: VARIANCE 86 -03 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of site plan, elevations, and issuance o a egative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Z�oni ng: North Vacan , enerai— Commercial South - Small retail center, General Commercial East - Single family residential, General Commercial West - 'mall retail center /Fast food, General Commercial C. General P7 , Ocsignations: roJec ce - enera ammercial North - General Commercial - South - General Commercial East General Commercial West - General Camnerci al D. Site Characteristics: The project site is a corner lot which consists at e building previously occupied by Wilmington Savings and Loan. The rear half of the stte is vacant. II. ANALYSIS• A. General: Vineyard National Bank desires to expand t'e former W'lmington Savings and Loan Building in order to relocate from its temporary facilities and establish a permanent h =e. The proposed project requires the process of a. Variance application (VA 46 -03) for the reduction hf street setbacks which is being processed simultaneously with this application. ITEM 0 PLANNPIG COh1MISSION STAFF REPORT DR 86 -17 - Vineyard National Bank August 13, 1986 Page 2 B. Design Review Committees The Design Review Committee cons em a oca mom and design of the employee eating plaza. "he enployee plaza area is located in the middle .,e the parking area and consists of three 8 °t. concrete :benches incorporated in a landscaped pedestrian walk area (see Exhibit "H "). Staff recommended that the plaze area be relocated within the landscaped area adjacent to the northwest rorner of the proposed two - story addition to allow closer accessibility and a more pleasan,,; environment. This area should include seating, tables, and trellis with vine planting for shading purposes. The Design Review Committee determined that the proposed plaza and amenities are sufficient for an office /bank use. The Design Review Committee reviewed the elevations for consistency with the Foothill Corridor Ic.terim Policies which require that the architecture of new construction shall be sensWve to the heritage of Rancho Cucamonga. According to the applicant, the proposed architecture is a contemporary interpretation of these design elements. The applicant suggested that the earthtone brick veneer, brown metal fascias and arches should be considered contemporary expressions of heritage elements (see applicant letter attached). The Committee determined that the proposed architecture is sensitive to the heritage of Rancho Cucamonga and an acceptable desi gn. In addition to the above recommendations, the Design Review Committee recommends the following: 1. Design the Foothill SoM evard drive approach to direct vehicles to make right turns only. 2. Design a plaza around the automatic teller machine located at the northeast corner of the proposed 2 story building (within building column eienent) to include decorative low profile seating wall and trellis cover. 3. Replace building rear wing walls with trellis cover. 4. Design future wail signage on single story building area. C. Technical Review Committees The Technical Review Committee has reviewed the project an etermined that Jth the recommended conditions of approval the prcjLv,;t is consistent with the applicable standards and ordinances. It shall be noted that overhead utility lines exist along Klusman Avenue from the north property line of the project to approximately 195 feet south and across the center of the property in an east /west direction from the west property line extending across Klusman 0-2- PLANNING COMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 86 -17 - Vineyard National Ban,' < August 13, 1986 Page 3 r Avenue, It is recommended that the overhead utility lines be piaced underground frat the west property lire of the project to the first pole existing across Klusman Avenue, and from thz exis.#ng power pole on the north property line to the existing pole, located approximately 195 feet south. D. Environmental Assessment: Upon revi --v and completion of Part I and Part ot Me Initial Study, staff has found no significant adverse environmental impacts related to the development of the proposed two- story office building. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The proposed project with the recommended con t. ions and approval of Variance 86-03, are in compliance and consistent with applicable provisions of the Development Code and General Plan. In addition, the project will not be detrimental to adjacent .properties or cause significant adverse environmental impacts. IV. RECOtNDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve e6 ve pment Review 86 -17 per, the adoption of the attached Resolution and Conditions of Approval and issue a Necrative Declaration for the project. Res fu 11y s tea /Brad Buller City Planner BB :DP:ns Attachments: Applicant Letter Exhi bi t "A" - Vl ci ni ty Map Exhibit "F" - Site Utilization izati on Map Exhibit "Cu - Site Plan Exhibit "O" - Elevation Plans Exhibit "E" - Perspective Plan Exhibit "F" - Landscape Plans Exhi bi t "G" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "N" - Plaz? Area Plan Resolution of Approval with Conditions Standard Conditions of Approval Q_3 THOMAS D. HARRIS, A.I.A. R C H 1 T E C T z, Jr; ?1. 28, 1986 r City of Rancho Cucamonga community Development 9320 Base Line Road Rancho Cucx -onga, CA 91730' Subject: Remodel and Addition to Existing Builditg,- Vi:4eyrard National Bank, Klusman. and Foothill Re: Foothill Corridor Interim Policies Gentlemen: This letter is in response to a request by Planning Staff to indicate how the subject project is sensitive to the heritage of Rancho Cucamonga. The four examples I have chosen are significant expressions of the heritage of Rancho Luca —Qa. They are all different in their style, functions and present use. The Rain5 h..use was an extremely progressive deign for 1861, 'rh,e contemgory structurzs of the day were'pri.marily wood frame and horizontal siding, yet thc, Rains, house -is T'asonry construction in a Georgian style which was cormon in the eaLt but certainly not in Cal forAia in 1861. The house was designed for formal living as opposed to simply providing shelter from the elements, The Thomas Winery has little significance stru=-irally since it has baen added to at different tikes using different materials. The st7icco exterior unifies the building and the grape arbor on the south and west add needed character. The bunk house, destroyed in the 1969 flood, uas a wood structure with vertical siding. The complex might be described as fvactional rather than aesthetic. The stone church is an 4nterest structure with its bell tower, curving parapets and block corners. The actual style is difficult to describe so, for lack of a better term, we will call it Klusmar_esk after the Guilder, Henry Klusman. 136 EAST 9TH ST., UPLAND, CA 91786, :41981- 3632 City of Rancho Cucamonga July 28, 1986 P.3ge two p. The Virginia Dare Winery was certainly the most significant of the four b aldings, being a beautiful expression of Mission Arc4tectu. e. Unfortunately fire and flood destroyed the structure and repair and replacement of unreinf<,xrced concrete walls was to costly to be practical. There is no common theme in the four structures described, nos do I believe: there should be. Each <was designed Lnd built to serve a particular need of -d function and each expresses the vision of the builder of that day. It is my aPina�R, h' diversity of form-and-material gives a city its vitality and appeal. The proposed Vineyard Bank building is a I,savy timber struc- ture expressed on the interior. we propose to use a timber trellis or arbor at the rear of the building at the walk -up windows. T`te use of brick in a co_�; temporary application and form is in keeping with the heritage of Rancho Cucamonga_ I wbuld be interested to kno », were Joseph Mullally (mason o`. the Rains house), .john or .Henry Rlusman alive today and given the assignment of building a bank Ld.th today='s tech- nology, just what the project would look tike. 1 therefore submi -; the Vineyard Bank project is appropriate to the orderly de` *(-_Zopment of Foothill Boulevard ? d is `eas ,tiV to the herritage of Rancho Cucamonga. 1 ee ely, L M 5 D. HARRT,S AIA 1 Architect " I TDH:dj F }, Tha'? 04fshausew asbuihin2$ 61 .lFtstheieeondo7des7j're•bricc M strucnarr is car7jomirt. .t �2Q. viaoLonel: numb— t) nArchibatdAucnueinCucamcnga.ca. I CaunegatgauchoCuramo aLD n4 r;.y 7.. 1 sE l 9 � * Wrd^s,`� f t . .. .. ..... ..r. — .��i +•awe�9�i'D:trs'�. ":n.e. "�' �.n 0, 6 ThrM( ss( nnM rginla Date) Winery.ThebuilderlohhKlusmar,is pktured in from[ c/ the smxturr- L- L N r IT W nODEnus An..l rru rli IK.hYN�^0= c .r, tl 'r. r! Y i IY Sdywl U .• I Y �. r (} CannW niN w «/I N .ENIa c:1 a VASE LfNE - 0•M $ i A s �1 °cam g n��+Jf'sr �^?tiv.rxriEo .o wp _ A` 41 r"cP'E vSy� OPE �r.r n r S . .o vEra. a HCE H °NTH r E cc s W S u mtro cs 3 p .. _ R OER }5T Al p i m1ACN1 V_T Al°Eaf IAONriOOpn a „�nW °q 4 R C w alu r PIT 3 >!p m 3 r sr' G Q wcxouA •wu r � ¢ M.cxarA "Nw , .ST N �iA as,°'° xcE,�, -. Y ..M4' Lit S> $ iii s n s 's �-•• " t ro. _ PAC e. z < .b Sunew■E rrELOW () at a`.T-___.�. PEUWL ST S ST r.2 2 3 4 O Tr S it r ti0 nyN 3AAI,SA _ i [ PLY 5, . I,TNSrI ; LSA S` .iqq 9 yp. CAI DLEWOOO Y ` 6 4E� z m CN+ Z n tl f W SSr¢ 6 F C '" N m F� 2 5 MsIr.ANDI£N'00 � ST. , < AAANNN UW L O 3 EWEEIr G Q 3 r � �•® y i< E.. •. TE` 5 ST E' 'c Eq F Qpyq tw I ) V(13I1E +JMii I i I MOBILE I, KOMfS) c bEK AN`•NrL P.B� r Auw�nsr Su.J ST. i ArMry i criUAGH //// ST, C Pa b Y •. 1fiiV KST. rr N . AEOEIIS PTA dECe EFF ST. . DORSETS ; Mill. �TAd-A--� BLVD. € ** � 2 L ..v� G S� m ..C3C& < POOTHIL L�d3 PSHIRE AMPSH LyO r' N U SL a 20 > J Z f;Af *� " . YM 1. r R E :UCAMONi,A q tt LI Oue °N -. KKEA or < ST fl'ssE < a 4 10 53� s �n KONOE•'TI S . cFs i CAt,LE ' VFJAR C FiVANT ST SST N ,h- � ■'� ROUTER < SUStHE55 CENTFF j ZIP CODE F°sfoMes■ pfl s L11 s 4173 4 ,.. 9TH 5T m 52 ' p'` S� Q 2!-VO. C .Amge PIHECflEST b 3 F Se1ka5■. PL A7. 6. SANTA A.A. ATN o' M R i criUAGH //// ST, fl0 ST, 1fiiV KST. ,yv EFF ST. . DORSETS ; 2 Wy ¢ g' C'G�'� h�R•pA 'T. G M Nalab K•a:+E are aR �Y POOTHIL L�d3 p..� ^� R,9.*L- t °b ar-may K H .AMP5HIAE5T. LAUR AV, o h i m ro BNTtN1 Z / , Plaza r' " . YM 1. r R E :UCAMONi,A q tt LI HArY G S (ARROW :E) � < a 4 10 5 - - AaEpyTlK+pKS 6oMV :ACIA O rT a mE � sT n ti ` irT� ee 14 S W K BE V£R AWTNOANE 1=-" f S7fi ST. S CgESCENT CENTER OR' � � y ++euw NORTH CITY or {TEM: ?�2 0 - / 7 IF RAINC O C,7C- TMONTGA TITLE: VXlI1J T -1- 1„� A2 4 PLANNING DIVISION ExIiIBIT: „ , SC, \LE- f ©-9 L Ic .. f lAYILI(REfb Ef ❑ ❑ P 4aEH.7010E4' UUU 1 a }aa ' ❑ awcmw �^ � *, .. � j fat t6F Yf.Y WEaE)EM j� { � SWENCEff rr 1 NaUTT (4e7 t PROJECT Y 0 ❑0DD06r — _ fRN1Et_P YL aG f _ I NCID,S� Go o D D D o DID it FOOTHILL BLVD: ter• sc 7.. L SITE UTILIZATION MAP NORTH CITY OF ITM'I: � Ga -'/ % RANCHTO CUCAMONGA TITLE-- PL.AI`dN NU DIVISION EXHIBIT: --- s. SCALE: �/�'S ml N r-] FOOTHILL BLVD.. IILIUST-FiAlrm- SITE' PLAN NORTH CITY OF RANCHO CUCAr,/joqj\,cA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISI(),N EXHlBIT--- SCALE -,6b_-S 0-9 k a 0 I 4 z 0 � :j x� s; i a y G I t FOOTHILL BLVD. CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPING PLAM NORTH CITY Or ITEM: I 8V -,� RANCHO GLTCATMO\GA TITLE: LA,yf-)sC4P-;=- TL 4AJ PLANNING DI \'ISION 0-12, F1HIIiIT= �� �� SCf1LE: ,clr5 wl- V FORTH CITY O' ITEM: _ DI P- RAINCHO CILYCAI'IC > NGA TITLE: O LVE Aa GgAD IA RW PLANNING DIN ISION 3 EXHIBIT fz4- SCALE -!�_T5 r_ � ��0 XaalXtl- .we Iir.i'ci\e•~W .yr 1LFw4El.r — =,�r-- �.7 Gf..6ea - n5^�� Fovfhiff 8/`d. S_ fi/,imnle Fh /m6arvErtrlhKbrkQnnii�irs #� Cv 300 Cu YA NORTH I CITY or, ITEM: _ -r 7 0, , � RAINCHO CUCANIOiTGA TITLE- PLANNING DIVISION 0 ' s EXHIBIT - � (f -2" SG1f G �•IrS TY rim p ' • • �t •;;, �a __?6 o'?� a�_ Lid ;�: 4" roq a� . T C4i ^ �� nc- _ ISvF i I O 17.50` ..1Mor' —l�'-Aw' r {� jax ISi ® 1 i e i 'k owl N, n � •. CITY Or ITEM: _ _ �.7 RANCHO CUCAI)jONGA TITLE= PLAT NING DINFISIC),N El'I3lBIT >L;aCALE: r � n � •. CITY Or ITEM: _ _ �.7 RANCHO CUCAI)jONGA TITLE= PLAT NING DINFISIC),N El'I3lBIT >L;aCALE: r j { RESOL67ION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLAt -DING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 86 -17 LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL AND KLUSMAN IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 28th day of May, 1986, a complete application was filed by Vineyard National Bank for review of the above -described project; and WHEREAS, on the 13th day of August 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above- described project. follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved a5 SECTION 1: That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed project is dx;-sistent with the obje.tives of the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the sito is located; and i 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; ` and 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements '-in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the envirormen an at a Negative Declaration is issued on August 13, 1986. SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 86 -17 is approved subject to the following conditions and attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING 1. The drive approach on Foothill Boulevard shall be designed to direct vehicles to make right turns only to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the issuance of building permits. Ci <<P 1�" C V7 Resolution No. DR 86-17 - Vineyard August 13, 1986 , ',National Bank Page 2 0 2. A plaza shall be designed around the automatic tf-,YIer machine located at the northeast corner of the proposed 2 --tory building (Within building column elment) to the satisfaction,,of the City Planner prior to issuance of building Oermits, This plaza shall include decorative �,�%?w profile seating wall$ and trellis cover vine qrb6�s, 3. The wing walls added to thp- rear- building antrarce 'arbors. shall be replaced with trellis cov" vine i4� 4. Future proposed-, wall signage location shall be limited to the single story building. ENGINEERING 1. Existing Overhead Utilities a. Klusman Avenue - The lines shall be undergrottaded from the exiseing pole at the north property line to the existing pole located approximately in the center, of the site prior to occupancy. The developer shall be eligible ft- reimbursement of one-half the standard in-1,jeu fees as colle--ted from future developments as they occur on the opposite side of the street. b. Lines through the center of site -- The lines shall be Undergrounded from the existing pole at the west property linp to the fir��t existing pole on the east side of KIN-sman Avenue prior tc occupancy. No reimbursement is feasible for the undergrounding of these lines. 2. Drive approach on Foothill Boulevard shall be designated and designed as a one-way "Exit OnlyH. 0 { AOL Resolution No. DR 86-17 - Vineyard National Bank Augscst 13, 1986 Pa je 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THiS 13TH DA',' OF ACUST, 1986. PLANNING COT!fiMISSION OF THE CI'T'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, ytairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City o Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted 'oy the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of August, 1986, by the fallowing vote -to -suit: z AYES: COMMISSIONERS: t NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABcEU : COMMISyIONERS: tj 18` S J Y N 0 0 r 2 o ° Q 2 W H D °dLDi.a.w � y NV CA O^ q 1! cD d Va+u FLvditl UQ.. T E 6 6 V Y r O br.uD GN n U q YD GQ ^9 D�qCE G Y pE 9� i.r O a .0 V W N' g L E .-.0 Cd Gdq��K L9 a� y.....T - ro •°-.n .QON YGG nd quigN q� � p9f.. A'L� o _ �34gC °tl d•^� q� GCO: tls� �.Q� yOw ,?6E 6 b^ .+rod qu� - Cy6 nCr ^9a Ted Ly�b. mDMU •- J °6yq � V C 0. �.�-. °n�D � rbC N� O. =�La0 Y6 Cti} U M V�ti °'.3q _CC a GL u.T NCC AO V��6 °� SCE.G LTr drog0 dyp gi C q La ,°G- Xx� ° >o Ed ^�.9 rou ottl L�5 u�ia �y°c. aLW to E A m v ^ € c� � _ °Omm p�V -byY O� °.uc u a%•ti qrL dw C ��w V'.' °,n ab U Y LOV ,aka GCS L.. EVE ur6gU no �. ➢IM ELO. ts. 16 Oy CN° d ?G.6q CaY Apo �_y aNy��n �... Nq O, d.V qGN �c - �° Ntl. Gq d d � L ds 3.N C C no.° L y ^. tlw ° NC S.,,,• r.. 6 >CO y.a Can • '^ 3U p C.Y.,L� �.NU E C r V^°a qy^. �. :i Yq Y bra b'L'° Ow Qp�VL LCiv -O °L^L Gro Qp•+• W G Y La•r rogd.n 0.x1 NVL NC +r".nN if TNC ^�� tp EwE y�G GJ EE!oc � �4 .rte E � w NL.wcv .. uo_imao pyisGW abri R U�Y EQ^ .:G .° r v -e a+ _Ybn 2! zy.Oq °vii a".3 -dimy 23.y,c V CUaS. uv� S J Y N 0 0 r 2 o ° Q 2 W H D L O qq . E� T OOhi +^ L O d N� D u^ t� �uq a'^ na+ + Cw cw° d Y a M q 1 N S Y r �f 13 Ll L C q La 4.1 a d9 Y o a+ z c F G Y J l N� Y w L 6 N OI t ^t uw j V ►Y U J . C 2i?z L Y 4 n D N N m 4qJ. V 6 4 2 E I} 4 f L O qq . E� T OOhi +^ L O d N� D u^ t� �uq a'^ na+ + Cw cw° d Y a M q 1 N S Y r �f 13 Ll a.YdO� C V ^ do p 6r OS'ior �� N E- d ^LLGGq q LEVY.. O� CgBr c^ `ea a ,q A Ln AO. RU�.� ^x 3 Uq N^ �p LL GnVL> O ~p.p.V .0 nN L CYd V LxC xCOx d dZ 9L ZxEV p Jj 5p ^6 PdL�.. 01N V.O A9 De' 4L L.CY T+� ^Y a04A �aq EO^ 1v i' d LCr, �yLD G Gu. Ltl O•V NEd CO.,z ~c.u` y OAy� =N 1. Vny`r EOto a V.+„O„ 4 L._ai 5 q0 AN vsrLA^ Ytd G nc� ycv NY -'Z Li 6L xL O =yY Y.LV.er L '^ OTi.d.A V T=RC 3c, ° tl p C d C q i d a u to w0 h y ^WD np 3 CNmN V � wq 'O L C q Ly Od;W EV^ QqF q G Vyu a! '. .e x _ to m O' dG p xO.E- V W.' N LL.d O�wgC L G d Y G 6. V d:LV pL d 0 D x 4 0 to C L oqn Gy d C r^ V xz vO E dyp w L A 4.N N No mGM �� n` qN to ; H� CCq F. x V. to oy�a Z. 6cm y•A+�e yto A'o. �u n dq m ��� .a�q dqW 21 L,Fy�r ^.^I VrNxG !� cL G. V uCN N V 6AU+G"Me T d d L A V A UA L. c V N W '" [n OqM V q W •.- L v- r L ro c t..a 3 4! Of nq 90�µ T ^ d m L Q E�0. 6 U 60 d� Gx dies u. p NL b VI I2. r FF N Yti x C EM O V y to Ap C cup ti� �f Nf nV 2bO.NN aO+c O. '1f V tu'^a�3 tJf OC GLM1•uG C•!f Vf N6.6 �� N Y •O] i n�. �p « iv t P 2 L 6. .Q Q q .O y 1J A N Q i L y D N y U n O q N 6 q a1 C� r - L O a d t=alc r- G p _ cc .° u �.°n na,. N j N •q u Vq '�A d p. D. Au: m n uq tJ L'H Nag CN N. ,A� G Ew C:u dn0 cy. �u a d q N N q C ^ r? ^ V V ... 6 p x y o x L ...� W OL d N� TW=IN 60gV UC�xL C. d^ CO ;CE L yt Y.+ ^�� H r xgCLt } y. N d D x 3 a.. D 6 3 C O x. L O1� cyY TC ttooV = € y L G.nO+ ^q y DGN•�j E Lad q�q Y= OG Gq O �LU CyWq nY gOTC �qA. y0 YH1� CV W'O ^m3H ONq tY ^dam q�p�q rq y�C T qu nUL jL 9CY OOY CCpq c r L _ C= CN L9 VNH ^a'dp� LOW cAgV9 Ob N N d^ 0 y G ? ^= q C n y C I ,^ S Y ,= E M o 3T 3 n Y q A a. V r D Y '� E q no p. .O. O e A N G g F L q p y tiyt N� uD',Cq r•+O C. ` Nn ^S T Cto r >q j.= G Vt T q TJ G�� xuG x N r+-- - r Cf�4gA i U O��hC N to h fl^ V •u .DeN O CA E Ly d d` qy N #Y Olp {r p,Li3 N'L NWT C01 NGU M. y p V C G O g p C G O q _ V G d'.. 6 D• u. T O ..0 V D T Y T u L q L vi O E G a'y O p ` G y94 O G� GGL dL Vyq d` L aL t' ptVTa u.ii �� >c v yNL gO�ga LVgCC d q 6gdp LO LDL N N q Q V D r F C V C b L L U N d C 0..w .r y .+ vnums+o�.. -... K O'ad. R f N L 9 I � _ aONO CP ^C QU �C'O ^oLUC1�`lo0 tpld P Et.id. d L > > L a•�.. 6oy o� 6 .p z � '°d °° d °��°�� aW °a,. C V U'm .. Na ne Ya. vtt A�4 Cw Laa' EaaYV �i.� � AYy� pM y, ON a4. f qY oown91 >f Y uO Ri°Tu NZ d C U -E.4 Z y B n qC O N v. p ..1 d N L• ry a Y SL .p0. Nd lta. C cEN N TU Y4 0.,C 4w }d d ^' L Ay L n YO o Nd LO'Q d G G Ln. �•Y. 0.s L Q a'4. O 1.+! O ♦a t N << N Y •. h O O to 6Y p E7.gYM " yY C C,:!W y,y L NL NOUN N LO,N yN °NL - E QM O .19 OTd y GI 'a ONY6p qo—p - t aL�o 1 �L O L 6�pgC�. LcOC YO .y0. N . .. M$..al. '�" I' non wu mpl9 '^ °ur o° La. n�'m T'� gal •� €uY E Ed Ldp OI d � GC .M Od ' N olT -vo�u t4— N b N 4N r 4 u4i 3 N 0 1L v Q N V > N 6 :l I pLO4 aWC 9C � <.� =L r dY = CY 6 .-L� du .NY. _ >Y aA d6iC wYY ZQ O' �t yy uY n y ' CLO N °Y� CC a Y LU V'!'•uN rp OCn°i F-,<9 LL^ ANi d.L N.' °� Td •! O1S� a ay ti „u T^ wq ad N rd aN 4... > Y a o -g 0 1'L 44 Lv"- Can a L'L t C Y y NT N p A u m tl o 0 o c pin p �. Y d� A 4 ,rm N c HY non» 'm ya ogc'i <^ sa t .�N 'O •^,!y 4 E L •L..9 Ny y ~EE T a 0 n < v EU ✓aim Y u^ ✓9� oa-w aO GL �> Y LY LUp Y O n.Y V t G.dC., ^ °m. CU W ALOb qa LC `d q u ^ q u L j .. Y y y uA 6 mNYC> Y o- CL yl h9 YL "Eds a YC gz cL y Oy C N C Na Y.LU T d° a• BYO r OCq�q. 6 7 6 Law 4 '= U E A s E a = p L L O ✓ 4 n U b > 1 # L N O O 6•+Na CA'i.m } 69.1 1"4N x^4'1„1 <b to. N'ra 60 Cn 4Nnd Who ++N.u0. b N Q F ", i G q d rn9 pd?� CC y q L u 9 n 6 y y o 0 evoi N �$ y IN L x a u •• O C 6Ep0 I NNLLG N�N . -'O N. G� O, D_ GCTxi e^ ad. dEgG Lqe y m d�qW y'NNUE GGG U .yap Eq Sti_Gy Gp vYW e9En O a d. a+°•dVW sp O d uq aa+nYE S M AJ IV q dE Ty G I... r�qw d �y uondE dd C � E N E E U... On -.M N E � d m y L'dOm iN E C W LL q O 1-UWi 6�6a1i 1A 1�gwp N N 6U� G LU �Cqy ZO _ c 3 E A L^6 d E 6 J Gin Wca d roc y9 IdNy n NH ° Ct U ° E Un 6�JI_ {11 dUA a c I cu qty \ N° gnu>f ^N pNi ^U « GZ yT a.Y wqi Odd uo CIA 6G.0 >O dSb Gpd d mN > i`H_R GG Q_ 4.. �•�.G Nye Wy �> Sroa rp.nA pC^.^jz o o tq w q ° Ga+ O L do CO u 9 p'U dODU° y0a+ L8 3LD n CTY LY am GpI yu Aa �i v pa ud Gq En dy d ib ..G-C ni EL» q p C O: o N 'tl -4 G O. C 9a S)^ =yd qti �O: GLo GNP w L YO Lu y' ^a`�OS L pay ue N T A �vGxC dN dE . 'TOUi yd ^ayG- G a NuD. y �N^ oda� z y yi NilL� c a VdC^ usi c"iE v•a FZ E a,a �upay ^.. 6L?adi NLy°i ° +�- O n �^pL rn q E a dr'u 9L ' u aytp A NIe'O pt T¢ » N h qN I�AyN f46u Al q F D6 F O C �I NI� frl. i G q d rn9 pd?� CC y q L u 9 n 6 y y o 0 evoi N �$ y IN L x a u •• O C 6Ep0 I NNLLG N�N . -'O N. G� O, D_ GCTxi e^ ad. dEgG Lqe y m d�qW y'NNUE GGG U .yap Eq Sti_Gy Gp vYW e9En O a d. a+°•dVW sp O d uq aa+nYE S M AJ IV q dE Ty G I... r�qw d �y uondE dd C � E N E E U... On -.M N E � d m y L'dOm iN E C W LL q O 1-UWi 6�6a1i 1A 1�gwp N N 6U� G LU �Cqy ZO _ c L^6 d qGW y9 IdNy n NH UU Un C- 'o, qvN dUA d y¢YpO qty L rL N° gnu>f ^N pNi ^U « GZ yT a.Y wqi �l •yG uo CIA 6G.0 >O dSb Gpd d mN > da a>•� Wy �> I p° .g T; us rp.nA pC^.^jz o o tq w q p =O Ga+ p0 L8 3LD n CTY LY am GpI yu Aa �i v pa ud Gq En pfd .r. ib ..G-C ni EL» ,FW dN uy6c .- e _ �yO 9a •O Gp XS GNP w L YO Lu y' ^a`�OS L pay ue N T A �vGxC dN dE . 'TOUi yd ^ayG- G a NuD. y �N^ oda� z y yi NilL� c a yj y �yi6 L wa A ap FZ E a,a �upay ^.. i'•°_ oc id NID 4% E O n �^pL rn q E a dr'u 9L ' u aytp A NIe'O pt T¢ » N E 2, ur E qN CFyNO Oqy G ^N o •ayW L ay �Tya GSC^ d C EGO 4 G° q D6 F O C 61- LGdd uW ag0q0. MIO u d y L pup 6 .^ u'B^ ay U pLm p 9 W rn'E° ��%�L..°- L U Leo^ 1-•NA Yy & Sir JL.ET 6N 1- •ne�q� 4d N� L o Oun+N. .r+ EO EG U W W W E I y L >d0 6 4M u ` \ \ \�I \`•�y7t D •� 3I ^qq U. �� tl AW r &4! c° C «z L y� p,y L +• N d r0 a ^9 C E O NE AML xYL .. E LdR' N L y N O 1 y I L GM-" CQ�C Ex^ dy LI.° W n CdjTO O ^u SuC . YNCIU6.c TdC Y K u M � V 6Y� Nyrn •° w 6 �j dFi D y` C9 La La °.. -�.yL 4 dc'^° •n �o •- t Yq„uE ^ 9mOY L6a� 4 t^qA NL Y y a > YN 'C UU �.�C. Im S Y cq ^� nq Evy 9 d O 2 o `'W v^ OW rN VD 4A V° qY nl. J ANkn 1 E p H c a. N��' one: j 2L °yam,, m.,. ,°•� L v 1 ya°, a o xr_ Y'— 'u d YN ,e b �d u q+q' cN EE •- Cy s n nrn c a � � y i �Y 9mE L+c- o as � cq T'L 9 • YO YO MaC W' & 0 4r �b ^0'� O U ^L °CC XtN Y p A rn c u n01 L YL gTOLU 40 d O^ �� b NY N 6y Y� 9= l.. Y C uC y EC a• °� O. A. v C L V Dn A > O „n N V 4 G -, c- O M L Lp� ?= pm� • q L Y OI rnV r, O yrn'Cd y �N 9c VD f' Y °Y rCE EZ rnN pay r� �U 6° Vw 4LG-V� py u9 1M, q NY9h. Kee RC. On+N -E.�%L W N b f ! Z 41 U cli •rs � O L El '!T- 0 ° o °. oI EO �v b L La 3.•. t+ .}- d'.32� u W '`nom, n p ...b Nd c �� L� a .• Qb� o ... Cam• -•. o 2 � C A'd. N N Lao LY C 0 N N W r y u_E R to •p. ri, � i Em m $ aEi Eo y.T, F& d +N+y L Ed u a w 117 W L NUraa° wN a^ �-4•- r G 4 T: N wb Y G+• L �'� �r y N � N.b 6.v 6T G° t° 6 < U G W d ° is �N A ui' c u M o `� Ewa dU AO. S C y N O w. 2 NU r gya•YE erE idar q0 d at ndN Y vqw�. Nu cE O 12 ° i7 xY ° r d Qu LN •'• y L c.¢d n0xi dgLC d6V 4•� �p. NL C. n� a. L EL a+to E�+_ 6 l 3 .. :. Eq. udiEy La q o'er d 6. LtNn aW Cd dN �� ma �^ i'N 3cd dC Taq on. cM Ii. s. EE y6 i >a duo T YL N c ,o � �-d b, r- Ci Iy' Ea N q d U 4T 'L NrW Y O.t°a �t � 3 Y O q, Ny WE a A i%O.W .en ° nN 4 « h6MK L ado 6d.G y.0 ° U ¢ d� N L L ± U ^ OL Q. rd Z; oa I ll L Syr — o =b e.N a° yui u 3.•. t+ '`nom, n5 c b i y r da b Yt g;N CO V °N i.n aT pna�o A'd. N N .o,• d LY C LLnu �F v i \ Em € y F& d +N+y L Ed u SU .c• w.M. 3: 117 W L NUraa° wN a^ �-4•- r G t d EEN !!E 4q. GO'L al ° tez = V z;c Y adi c} <L V4 a7 &r-7 0-&4r-7 r t a oa I ll L Syr — o =b w N .� L. cN.r. lLL .o,• d LY C LLnu �F v i \ € y 117 L c E A Y N CT L d N q d d O G C ^W d t Iu r O y G VIE ° c O0� +\ t Y .p.Ny 0 V U N u . 2 G ro coo b p� L 1'•a a ¢cc°aa � Y uY E W � W N =O L u n o y O G C a b N y b i V X L � A C y ~ oE� UOl LL 011Y O y E � rL. ow O � if P *. t iL , C]� G � U° ° O � d L y. b A .2 M� L =yb N M a Yy a L 'p ELCL ++ h NC o o CL � d VW A O u 1v'•i w. � 17 _ N u' `bc dp °c �d M• 0. � V d L � b 0 6T 9 d Ed d O yd N L 4-1 1..) V pw T yy k O E �. y � G Y +• q. � L _ m A a E p � y L• O ++ p0 IL n y 40 6 y L �y G yUT D NC. WY L p^ a Ty Nip V N V 9w U V ¢ OC �c t u. O N °L . u'u _� N ayc V YN YL .-. L � L• b0 N E S� .p+9�r O y G VIE ° c O0� +\ t Y .p.Ny 0 V U N u . 2 G ro coo b p� L 1'•a a ¢cc°aa � Y uY E W � W N =O L u n o y O G C a b N y b i V X L � A C y ~ oE� UOl LL 011Y O y E � rL. ow O � if P *. C]� G � U° ° O � d L d 0 b A .2 M� L =yb N M a Yy a L 'p ELCL ++ qE iu c VW A O p d ��tl�i .,- V d L � b 0 6T 9 d Ed d O yd N L ca YLL N �° c yy k O E �. y � G Y +• q. � L _ m A a E p � y L• d .^ C¢ yb YW IL n y 40 6 A d E Y d^ C as b� M. i t jq.0. U V O y G VIE ° c O0� +\ t Y .p.Ny 0 V U N u . 2 G ro coo b p� L 1'•a a ¢cc°aa � Y uY E W � W N =O L u n o y O G C a b N y b i V X L � A C y ~ oE� UOl LL 011Y O y E � rL. ow O � if P *. F1, a L CITY OF !,,ANCHO CUCAMONGA � ��ca yogic 0 0 DATE August 13, 1986 ' �> 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Pl ning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Debra Meier, Assistant,Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSNENi-2 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86 -14 - HAVEN MESTORS- This item has been continued from the July 23, 1986 Planning Commi -ision meeting, at the applicant's request. Prior to Planning Commi;' `~en`s consideration of this project, the applicant -;z; =tempting to obtain a meter of approval from BCE Development Architectural Board. At this time', the applicant is still working with BCE. Staff recommends continuir-g this item to the August 27, 1986 Planning Commission meeting. BB:DM :ko ITEM P U lY L1,}V11.JV V VV1".7t1 UC �y1 STAFF REPORT G p4Cg 2 3 n 7 • ;s DATE; August 13, 1986 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad duller, City Planner BY- Dino Putrino, Assistant Planner SUBJEc?: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86 -18 L e developm en -o a , square toot office ui Ong an 1.7 acres of land within the Office Professional District, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Turner Avenue - APN 208 - 331 -30 I. PROJECT AND SITE [DESCRIPTION: A. ;Action Requested: Approval of site plan, elevations, and nssuance of ega ive Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Nightclub, General Commercial. South - Single family residences, Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac). East Day Care Center, office Professional. West - Restaurant, Office Professional. C. Ge ^..erai Plan Designations: Project ite ice Professional' North - General Com:lercial. South - Low Residential. East - Office ?'- fessional. West Off i r,-ft i . �A *essi onal 0. Site Characteristics: The project site is a 1.7 acre vacant p�rcel between a eveloped sites: Michael J's on the west side, and Kindercare on the east side. In addition, the project site abuts single family residential uses at the south property line. The site grade is approximately 6 to 8 feet lower than Foothill Boulevard and slopes gradually southward. II. ANALYSIS: A. Background: At the May 14, 1986 Planning Commission meeting, �ommiission reviowed the initial conceptual plan for this project (Preliminary Review 86 -28) on a preliminary basis to make a consistency determination between the Foothill Corridnr ITEM Q IR 71F_ Pi- RNMING COMISSIoN STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86 -18 - L & M DEVELOPMENT August 13, 1986 Page 2 f. Interim Policies and a commercial office building. The Commission found the project to be consistent with the Interim Policies subject to some "fine - tuning" to achieve the design goal for Foothill Boulevard. B. General- The proposed project is a three -story "L" shaped offies uiiding in which the entire ground floor is reserved „ for parking only. %The second and third floors contain approx., ately 33,250 square feet of net leasable office area {gross building area = 37,560 square reet C. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee expressed concern that a proposed plans dift::red from those originally preseited to the Planning Commission for preliminary nevifv on May 14, 1986. Those plans indicated that the buiidir4 was designed to retain the landscaped area along Foothill Boulevard, there y screening the first level parkis;g a'Ad raising the landscape area to be seen from public view. 'the applicant is now proposing to slope this area from the p -abl is right-of-way at Foothill 6 to 8, ,feet down to the base of the parking level, thereby, exposing the parking area and hiding the landscaping (see Exhibit "H "). The Committee recommended that the 45 foot landscape area along Foothill Boulevard be raised to be seen from public view and screen first level parking using a combination of berming and decorative retaining walls. The Design Review Committee also expressed concern with regards to architecture for Foothill Boulevard. The east and south building elevations best represent and capture sane of the architectural design elements which relc' }e t6-the heritage of Rancho Cucamonga, such as the use of vine arbors, wineberry and desert -tan colors, and riverrock. Although the primary emphasis of these - features are presented in the east and south building elevations, it is equally important to sufficiently reflect these elements along Foothill Boulevard. The Comm +tee recommends that the pl anti ng incorporated wit'; the building accent handrails be carried through out the ot4er areas where the handrail occurs. in addition, the proposed ricerrock should be incorporated into the landscape area along Foothill Boulevard. Further, it is recommended that a climbing vine (Fcus Punila) be planted at the base of the tower element. D. Technical Review Cummittee: The Technical Review Committee has reviewe a project an determined that with the recommended conditions of approval, the project is consistent with the applicable standards and ordinances. It shall be noted that existing overhead utilities are located on the opposite (north) Q—z 0 �Y Y' 0 fi C PLANNING COhf8f5S1fiN STTAFF`REPORT DEVELOPWIT REVIEW 86 -18 - L & M DEVELOPMENT August 13, 1986 Page s side of Foothill Boulevard, fronting the project. Staff recommends that an in -lieu fee equivalent to one -half the established cost be paid as contribution to the future_ undergrounding of the utilities. E. Environmental Assessment: Up review and completion of Part I an ar o e nittai on Study, stiff has found no significant adverse environmental impacts related to the development of the proposed two -story offi c4 building. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This prof.ect is consistent with the Development -Code---anU General Plan. The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed site and building designs, together with the recommended conditions, are in compliance with the Development Code and City Standards. Iv. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Bevel pment Review 86 -18 through the adoption of the attached Resolution and Conditions of Approv -1 and issue a Negative Declaration for the project. R tfully t ul br ! City Planner BB:DP :ko Attachments: Applicant Letter Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Elevation Plan Exhibit "E" � - Landscape Plan Exhibit F - Plaza Detail Plan Exhibit "G` - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "N" - Section P Ian Resolution with Conditions of Approval Standard Conditions of Approval �a ,.i SONNY L. MASCARENAS,AXA.,ARCHITECT June-18, 1586 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 4320 Baseline Rd. Suite C Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Dino Putrino Dear Dino, We are submitting our proje,1, the RAI.3HO FOOTHILL PROFESSIONAL CENTER, for design review. As you know, the project is in the Foothill Corridor district and therefore requires . various architectural elements reflecting the heritage of Rancho Cucamonga. We are sensitive to these concerns, and have blended together architectural components which we feel will relate to the history indigenous to this area. What is Rancho Cucamonga? It is an area blessed with a strong sense of history, and abounds with historical homes and buildings whose roots are deeply imbedded in the grape vineyards and wine industry. This is the city's basic theme, and is reflected in various residential en3 commercial, land uses. Considering our site is within close proximity to two historical landmark wineries, our building will include such materials as a mauve flat concrete tile roof; a desert -tan plaster exterior; wlieberry accent colors; and a generous amount of trellised vine arbors. We are using river -rock in many landscaped seating areas and suggest curved parapet walls Co recall -other historical architectural features. We have made a strong attempt to incorporate many archi- tectural elements that comprise the historical character of Cucamonga and the surrounding areas. ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • INTERIORS 415 W, Foothill Blvd., Claramont,Ca 91711 Phone (714) 62S•4428 0 E Page 2 Thank you for the good working relationship we have had on this project, If you would like further clarification of our design intent, or have any further questions, please feel free to call me. Sincerely, ^ EMAS RENAS ARCUITECTS y L Mascarenas, A,,S,A, ip 1 SLM /am cc: L & M Development file k` f L J RD a•r ; . _ l u q r f' PfrtTn $ l`EPPERI rofP` EeI' MrM M °YW M W[MO S-CP t y. MFq.# t »Ti wl Tyr' snoa�..TEErlrrr pis 1.. Jr •n /� '"^ 'an° .Cu ! aTlk f �+% A OER 1 t LN 1 >a' 4tAFy "b /�`{Jy� ' Si •I Err l ST PAL = _~Na F {} e�'E wl,ylASr F,} r.LaDW �~ is R><W'f•. .j /l �•pN -Y SA ` T � s Y IAW Sr S IV Sr. ` A� � t-� Lq qy Yom'{._ W.IN . ': i. /p tl� - Er ' 4 \i t0J. H 3 'E x Y 1 1 Mta00 • rggi VE < �Q� i Y 2` � __ P f sr 9 � i _ � sr �srW �i .� tom, ta'yifa'.jyEL a' 3 Lc e glrufa °e Qrto ar``x �a~ EANG57 �ILSN O1 > 4uwGo•� ? w� CHURCH 6T ARavM .,�a w l x sa iEf 5�$. T% °P""�daa"rSr` ,.4V°''"'`r } r M o f ` rca °s > R r `, P' TERRA VIE v. •ziR VNg r Z �Z w - o ,� ` ' c AWWDaMo- 1 W vv 1 M AV. < W 3` SSA r 1 yrAOiau q e LL ./ > NSET SL S � BEflNM INP fl0. '•M. t A O i S f'i a _ j ` �5T "�� rliUry LS aN AEOEIIF G�..L4` ? IOTHILL c . HPMts BLVD. r •a s c a 66)_L )OTHILL M d .. T Suw a i (,)W q �o S.: '4: r. I R.�s vt�. 'o: un s �^ AcVnt MtSHIRE C) AMPSHIR ¢ T. M06�1E i -HIRE ST. W'AKECS AV. ¢ nus ST �. °3 T N[ts[ir �o1EtSFj O c n 4 z 3j HOMIS .Y 9 F . op is O _ bDEVON 5 I_ - -- _ DEV01Nl. 0V qV. <` L r SE SL - {,++, Cucamonga 1 - gKEA IACE.9 YOR, _ R i' PEACEF S7 r"'.j �( AIV! \lNlJA H AOOr yr1e55 Cen10 r 5 a KOH CER 5T. •+ L(4 ^ ;F.µO,. ft OC71 > xMOw. k'/ Diu 2 I CALL VEJAR¢ >Frl1AN75t SL Ntm Y�a60 p iFMI I/K)f ARROW 11 HWY. 1W ROUTET j BUSINESS " w`R"E u y p - ( ARROW ROUEEj 12 ZIP CODE w�R�DR. -- --- N $� uHAS (�(y r—T —EC°ma c °'f� - a b E 91730 �a�A 9117 ST 9b. kt 9TN ST 1 MCMN EY 57 b V ? 26n1 ST. < CUCamMg MHECRE$T E E f q.. ..QI }A'1 JEiLSEY BLW sf SeMGre PL C _`e :G ?b�Tk 19..E g; - Aax.'t.' - RE N DLVD. < 2ETlf ST� S MAIN G 41' MAIN ,s AT 65ARTA °E ;;. �•~' 6.R ¢ .� St HUMeOl.Oi �. AV. RaEPUts:glr iMY1{.'E b Lu.VeOY.SM LYE 011'. er C~N, ST Bl �'� MST. i BoftiAMT'tAKkISM ENrMrfnA �¢ NY ►y H - St �A- A O �gOgCt57 BT T7R sT TTN ' sc ZIP CODE TTH > 5T. -91730 WED LW 1 w u uJ C t 5T' W ¢ 3 5T. ERON = RatIaM CNCeN:°Elya i DE K.1 O RBROOKST EERW.T SHARON pR u � '�YSDLhNBO.t Cantor M ADOW ST i yx ST. sT. 6TH FI Sr 6TH 13 ffi 1:1 R 13 jj z I HAW7HORNE z NORTH CITY OF ITIE —M: rs� —Ifs RANCHO CUCAIvIOjNTGA '`` PI ANNII\TG DIVtatO��i EXHIBIT. �r ,t SCALE= A/TS ' 0 s Fla Q IL = J 0 = J o J a L It F m a p C.) 1. Cj _n 1 l G r J Y N Z a 2 h 90 O Q4 z F. } � F f.4, ■ P • R '' h is Olt a is _n 1 l G r J Y N Z a 2 h 90 O Q4 z in 1 Q AW Ts wy 1 r , Y r V-*� F 0--/ cWT-1 �`R t A IS : a o 'Z r , Y r V-*� F 0--/ F �1X �y cWT-1 �`R t 1 o 'Z F �1X �y 7891 P.RxB. FQOTHILL BOULEVARD .�.<' Sit 1. .•<:t<" .y�NI II r 1� � a�xxri t �� IIAfT f000A FJ f.t .. BlR \ —TI 11 , wx umr.Yr -. \ �•- • n <F• � •• �)�at wi AtL AAIl41M�Aw• Y t�°�� ✓ V \1 \ vlrorfrnn io Auau \ / \ j I q S I— 1\URTH YiTlYid') - 7 �;, -1 i ...f �:IT of ITE \1:/�r - f, RANCHO CUCA'IVIOiGA TITLE:,11/6'PTUAI. 071734 " TLAN PLANNI \G DIVISON E. \Ima ' z-- LSCr1LE: Lr-S f # 1 CROSS SECTION A -A -1 ILF- rbc -,aar CROSS SECTION B -B S 00 SCAM I ! n 2 7 `,. CROSS,, SECTION C -C f� Z 00 $GALS Y an " IMM" 02OS40. 99S9iA • Astor.. fYt S.9' iTORSI' "TA9/9. 00. 6f 199 $7$29.8 -219.9 M� tayh Iiyy' \ v y •t' CROSS SECTION D- Ib1 I NORTH crry or, ITI\ II _ RA\TC.;HO CLYctkNIONGA TITLE: G7zoSS -50n7koN �L PLANNING DIVISION MKI TIBIT: u1 a v :rw c� 0 Ir UL n �a ►zi+ v(� 11-5- RESOLUTION NO. MIF A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUC.4MONGA PIMMING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 86418 LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, EAST OF TURNER AVENUE IN THE OFFICE PROFESSIONAL C,STRTCT WHEREAS, on. =the 20th day of May, 1986, a complete application was fil4d ty L & M Devel opment for review of the above - described p- oject; and WHEREAS, on the 13th day of Auqu5t, 1986, the Rancna Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider tha above - described project. f o11 ows: 'iOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Gj- amonga Planning Commission resolved as SECTION 1: That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed use is in accord with the ! objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and E 6 3. That ite proposed use is in compliance with each of, the applicable provisions of t6re Development Code; j ar,,� 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the put l is health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvenents "in the •;�i ci ai ty. SECTION 2: That this Project will not create adverse impacts on the envirormen�'an- 1-aat a Negative Declaratinn is issued on August 13, 1986. SECTION 3: :'hat Development Review No. 86-18 is approved subject to the follownng con 7tions and attached Stanjard Conditions; P! anni ng: 1. Planters shall be incr norated into the Foothill Boulevard building elevate.:: (,srth) as well as the west building elevation with the accent handrail at the patio areas s.milar to the east and south building elevations to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 2. Riverrock shall be incorporated into the landscape area along Foothill Boulevard to be seen from public view to the sati e` fiction of the City PI anner. fT7 PLANNING COM+IISSION RESOLUTION NO. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86 -18 - L & M DEVELOPMENT August 13, 1986 Page 2 1� A cl ir& 1 ng vi ne such as Ficus Pumil a shall be planted at the base of the ;tower element along Foothill Boulevard. 4. T_;e landscape 4rea along Foothill - Boulevard shall be designed at a grade equal to the street grade using decurati ve retai ni ng vial l s and incorporating the appropriate mounding to the satisfaction of the City f. Planner. t 5. The landscape area along the west property line shall be designed at a grade equal to the existing grade to the west aujacent property using decorative retaining walls to increase parking area screening and bring the landscape area into iui 1 view to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 6 6. The landscape strip along the west property line shall be widened to five f51_ feet. 7. The pedestrian walk through the center of the parking lot ?" shall be designed ,o meander with landscape pockets (see ORC comments, Exhibit "A ") to the satisfaction of the '- City Planner. 8. The area along the south property line shall be landscaped at a minimum rate of one *.ree per ten feet. 9. The wall along the south property line shall be modified to include a wood fence hel ht extension to match and continue the Nall along the south property line of Michael J's property. 10. Brick pavers or sft'lar material shall be used a- a texturized surtace•in the pedestrian walks (do not e stamped conck -ete). 11. The balcony patio areas shall be landscaped to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Engineering: 1. Notice -^f intent to join the proposed Median Island Landscape District shall be filed with the City Council prior to i, -uance of a building permit. t. A fee shall be paid to the City in -lieu of undergrounding the exf Ling overhead utilities (electrical and teleco rr cations) located an the opposite (nortf,) JdO of Foot.;_ Al Boulevard prior to the issuance of building permits. Said fee shall be one -half ;:he establisitid front foot cost for the project frontage, a distance of 2 9 feet. efi ANNING COMMISSION RESOLUI°aION Ni` DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86 -T8 =- L & M DEVELOPMENT August 13, 1986 Page 3 1 3. Al,Apertineat conditions of Parcel Map 7891 shall ap!yly a wh&e appl i cabl e. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1986. n PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: erni s L. Stout, C ai man ATTEST: Brad gul I er, epu y° ecre ary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of ',,:tae City o-f Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolutiof vas duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of August, Stg$6, by;the fallowing vote -to -wit: ' AYES: COMMISSIONERS: _ ' NOES: COMMISSIONERS: W ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 0 Q -ice � S n, I ON Ask ;j M 4 YO C^ 4Q qQ C GT° Y{YrsiK i Sr.MS Y O Yt 6�_ 7 O ■pp .� d'�q. >, 4a��°�y+. �s j}4y ,kYYFWyy NAY Up. , SOY n Cq O .L a1 ^: etli Utl,P -C C? C.Y V ~�4 .�i�Y AON Xyo I`LL �!Cyyy[[ °Lay 4U O0 ^y C y`C4 YNPy� N4C Lt vp} Nit Gtl UW ^« Y M4�tl6.YMCNr cy° y'p N....V � �' 9W .1.1 MUD a °L aN C Y '0 U y E P�� 6 �° + r V 4 E •'a u�i{�1 L q° g p C nc» �TtlL T�. COY ��yyl�jrn y�E'C° U 4u tl Ny�C�. pd LCL q�g #a L�VN qw+ °may OLaC.. 0.+Ga ^�.L VL . »yY 1WOW „yP Y q "M °W i .gc Y cn +�qi^r �,":�,. °$ «� °�¢L ►g�P� o.�.g �, �Y d ci Y =NV qf.Y tl �OGpN 2Vy �[Nw gay. V Tc s I f° re It S n, I ON Ask ;j �cy e.� °s9� IZ Y V Tc s �� LauygLa Yu .t Y S n, I ON Ask ;j C� '! �,. ..°dc d a ba d a r °: L A q^ E cE mQ t F.0 i x A L 4 ° ¢a rav 4-, — ,% Ae u o r ^. b O N O O p Ay E Y p.'O 6y�' d.0 O dd eEaA FF N �.. T N D I N d O� S S C � O r ° p Z« L r 7. b _ u T'C ^ 9 V " r a x y y "L . _ U o rJ.,E.. 6. NE> L a ^. •GO N_RNd W.uN °47 t.'7 .� '+�Rn u N� °� '"'� 9r Yp'.0 Y ZNC Nom. p. yd R = A «Na t-Na tv A aC+� E N Uad ^aO O 6 ,Y aY O A «dr �d u 5 A v 2 tL ° °q La~ ....0 6 � °�C CODU .� � S� t iaa Y= L C i R. d Y •ry L�� Y N ^ Y V� L A= 2. G 6D pg n L d 9 p y d 6EUa6 .:'dam = tAM NNL =2uLidV °rN O =L I I ° A � p fi A a 6 CC r^q CP UU OYyl4 id OA. 6T Ipyq o,3 d6 SNCnS�b ON Lr« CLC7S .� LN � yEyEaN Gal +.a. i 9. .-,:5 dA�Y �� 4�iO �t C. A c0 �0�,tt0 -cT yxj Judi. nd �nC .q U y SA d d Au °A . rRj� ^LGa qx C� U- M ^N i CRO NBC L� LE �C,'a^ LW `,o �.LagU TSa U G L`V $6 W3 �xgOVY �C xi O�YY T El iyN Z asd cAE.°- =`pis A ai �j Waq.pY ;ar i3: NE ncoY�.t a�W `4Y 3 r .-C p6 2H Lr >pYY 3 =ad t td Ol L LOq 'Hp !'r Tp6 Z' « A N ... CNN N aNn Qo ° ^ry0 av ~ Y .td+E dqA M., t 7ayE = YSj ax- uw4 4L -,55 iii« x... uMi « •^ Rc aY «4f�N V �'O b 1p� V O' =u =uti N NON «.r-NT Ary OL a .Z. camE1. a aY t.L °am LAGq E L 91�+r «OIL^a0 uu i°jt� }�+.. tpj 6 >CYT ¢N 6t' 6 \ « Nn -SND a�Na h Nd Q JOrs vOt AYSne dd W3 hVA / -.Cigr Lau C to 1 t ., 0 F 4 .a u C gieCf t z cr l.+lu N ^cC e+: LOu a ^4 �La .qa sy a c p.• Znq Lp QI 4. dp.Fr Tq.�nC �IV N N W N W x) �• ° y A p � l L T Y � a� Z ci �L €' O °VnNq eL ya, Lnq u u q z° m u i5 •�qcT 9 •O rn�pd •� qL .. auu At y' cYs�. 7. Q n _° N x o p �• a �9 m.„• c a u c n om_ v CL c �.+.. j yo Nd. ^LN N. s' »moo N� m^ piY. O L_q Yr icc �.L. L0G al Ha- L p f 'G �� GS VY 4 q � p O.^ q L 3- C• C E L E N E Y1 ddN cq^ E y gUYnti ot NL M V °up '6 J 1 OI C UL0� NL VY 4 °gN aL. °c m al^ qj Oj n1..^ t' qc ii a Ly g E,C 3C V p Y Cw C� V T cuT O ~Y�G 6 G L.OY C b.�EOa a°1suM E I,- � H - o u a a c N+- w < »'• 6 N' ZNp F.N. g 6N Y��L p. w60 <q�C6. l't� 4.c 6N C w C F� ii.Np .a u C gieCf Lc L r N ^cC °IC a ^4 �La .qa p.• Znq Lp QI 4. dp.Fr Tq.�nC �IV a..o ^' eL ya, Lnq o,wr z° m u i5 •�qcT 9 A wG'^ M cam' °O °m ��"EE'ii = GO ZE p,F OIL np CV n N� dt't Na c w w L G C w C F� ii.Np .G Fd <.O `r6 � Ern i CON u u u I�GN QV V HON _EE V LO E 1aa L f9 ^q <06. pW W6 l -N+�. �u P 7111 1]. O ca E A LL u � C �3 EtT+ Qq Ya. °L o V N cTL'. '�4. L • Nj q E D cam cu�z °c'o> u .� nia pEO jj.. qu��+ -bN r d �Gc LL O cu• d u� UO: a ty N >G dC� Y w Nao wLL ��01 °•.P ac4o`o _ qA d Nw� C dOY ��� YcaJ cam. o YCS qq° h CKj Hq� u Eta c L d�C C� cpV uaq �Y qyE ar :. 6106 E UO.r uiY o Y n�a6 L09Y h no9A f6 `Y 3iLLNn '-qq q2 TC 42-5 O ca E A LL u � C +a o N OtN � d rDn� to IT •I Ya. °L o V i Ot u Y y � Y d L �ACI —E .^' IR ti ' o c pEO jj.. qu��+ -bN r d �Gc LL O cu• d u� Amy g E >G VSA Ctd w Nao wLL 0 ^ymL I9 y t a MS _ qA Y L C^ Ary w u uA «da Y C q C d.6w mZLLY v � W YcaJ cam. 0.� dy v �Y y c q i5 ~1 cpV uaq �Y qyE ca :. 6106 E �L 4Y p�c o Y q2 TC 42-5 aiadv. Y-UW 4. d Lc nY ai.°c p.�gLy.N w°.tjGdq � 6ir qy,:0 N a > 6Ua 2 \JI Lr u° ca E A �n uTa u � C +a o N OtN � d rDn� to IT •I 9y i > • C i Ot u Y y � Y d L �ACI —E c ae..= �n q c = i. E L Y jj.. An V NN a .c DY ° 6"�..y r d �Gc LL O cu• d u� Amy g E >G VSA Ctd w Nao wLL 0 ^ymL I9 y t a MS _ qA Y L C^ Ary w u uA «da Y C q C d.6w .pi r 4 aYOf c C G`C Wa? rcj ti q V q i5 ~1 cpV Lq.a ".tL 6106 E �L 4Y p�c o Y q2 TC 00 a d ECd� �Ca =V Er'" � E n L ° - g L d 0 6 Nnc• E° .L, oo °d v. od qnq w q b 1r q '� 69 N O w t E L n c q Ytl. N ; y IF " -. a a s d.2 E c— N 3 d E q p Np ..0 gLaTi °o ci u O.q °Y.q. D°.0 O EE dd 5. c W N �U"'N Y F9r q..G .C6S0 GVNr.. \ \'y' H `.rVO.a' ` � 2 n L LA C v Y c u � C +a o N q i� aii r b � Y d L .pE O�^ >°N dU L�oE no da E L Y Y.Y d N p An V NN a .c DY ° 6"�..y r d �Gc LL O cu• d u� Amy g E iv tf3 Nao wLL 0 w q pd0 �uL N N 2 0 WL°. WEI 6NMV i5 ~1 I� L� c -aL l m Lq n as du t�y. Off^ 2:2 H i Z 6 9 �' '✓ tyY . m. L pf+ c^ rLL C q E yarn« «cNr y� C uo 4 9, an 2q�o� C^� Via. �p �0 � � Ty QO � �Nyn md•-.o o =oYa' uL cY c mo qc w mia� vyma �.. vim 'aL Yp v'y'F m� u^ o.°_M N°S %-=b2 _ZZ S� aq'] Ye aq mom.. VYN° V .91 d S ^ N'^• q t G W e�j m ; y y a y C q .:go. q N C N pp y a W n Y y aT N C j C r .t q N j • ---2 6 la a q 9 Yo q� >fq C� O a P may C�. -. L a 6y a N ° y y L° ] ^Y. Y iLlAp tJ ^ Y Cy V1 qN.- K- �� Nn L u _ « yLd Lqd E¢_yO ♦' ^L T" ¢1..+qO 6n • A ^L 0p9.� L L +' y LO r. NL YyOj E~nO 6 tL 'v NY mn¢m a.°p. a NY �GL N La ppa c� EO N >O N OC a.T L aO1ia ^^o cE ooN Ld k� °1 Y yY.m a.� L ° u o v+u C L N E u s y pa r O o .tC� ^'V u L pA �° Y LFfi? w LpY NONA�O �O. 4gN: OG�E.d-L w 04 :9 6 CJ� O.k <N Q J < O�Y F• t .t q �. U I Y o o ° i ia. a y A A U ac ^o y Y o a Y y U Y ^ - � � � Y Y p d q q j 1 1 Z Z q A i i a p a p 1. - � � � p V q �L o a as ° i o Y o You C1 L L..• N N L ° oy � � Y ou-i Y Ol 6.. E A W 4 4. 4 N m O C E A Y p p W 4. k> E E,•,,.�• q 9 1 1 m T E =� y y -0 4 5. m E It, Cv n n0 d0 ' 'A•O q D y L D L U C C p . C.. ^ N O ^ t b+w c cm L O p. LLtfa Q QOUYO DAN � � � uk � � O LO 9 9y O` n o J N N M M < Y1 \ G G ri 2 2:2 H i Z 6 9 �' '✓ tyY . m. L pf+ c^ rLL C q E yarn« «cNr y� C uo 4 9, an 2q�o� C^� Via. �p �0 � � Ty QO � �Nyn md•-.o o =oYa' uL cY c mo qc w mia� vyma �.. vim 'aL Yp v'y'F m� u^ o.°_M N°S %-=b2 _ZZ S� aq'] Ye aq mom.. VYN° V .91 d S ^ N'^• q t G W e�j m ; y y a y C q .:go. q N C N pp y a W n Y y aT N C j C r .t q N j • ---2 6 la a q 9 Yo q� >fq C� O a P may C�. -. L a 6y a N ° y y L° ] ^Y. Y iLlAp tJ ^ Y Cy V1 qN.- K- �� Nn L u _ « yLd Lqd E¢_yO ♦' ^L T" ¢1..+qO 6n • A ^L 0p9.� L L +' y LO r. NL YyOj E~nO 6 tL 'v NY mn¢m a.°p. a NY �GL N La ppa c� EO N >O N OC a.T L aO1ia ^^o cE ooN Ld k� °1 Y yY.m a.� L ° u o v+u C L N E u s y pa r O o .tC� ^'V u L pA �° Y LFfi? w LpY NONA�O �O. 4gN: OG�E.d-L w 04 :9 6 CJ� O.k <N Q J < O�Y F• t .t q �. U I �• s y o o.Q °. v y W M Y YT�j b' a a n i 6 U•pG a Ir ac a ° n,+.AeNG 3 a yNho moo. c cOU�. G .°L.� y U N fJ 3° L O W W y C 1 O.M1O d d hMa q 0 M .54+ d ° ^ 0- l T 'o Am 5° z z°e u un a - • y y y v z G E E 6.q .(PL W q91 VN10.M¢ 4 4 \ "m r u 1, na a pC°O CiOL n Ey I. CU YP �i�^ L. TW 6n� Uy 1� J u. L 3N U qG UL �U °c.L• � N a1O .CU Y.' _cU 9Yi �. G.L ,° d s+.g1r q01 qO N o 6w. O•NV Ce �y 9 ='IN° 4 E W +�T 6h 91 N d GqN C9w'. CNY L ° W NELpLC .T A nc bN La ° at' i �i^ � eO6 a OGN,L y o Q mFO. ..aU v � O p N 0 ° Z 24 Ct a V u .T 'U^C w qG �qnL� G„ n Uq + i N NU LW ^ Ty E dS t E T. 6Fr uygi � T Y a ¢al; .°. �'no.• vyiv dwo. +'=.. 4ca = '� NL� sn u °o 4 �.. a yN M M . .°NOO v v y W M Y YT�j b' a a O Un yn a a ° °G UNd 4 4' 94� �t m moo. c cOU�. G G y U Nd f fJ 3° L a O y O.M1O d d hMa ^9. 0 loo a v ° ^ 0- l T 'o Am 5° z z°e u un a - • y y y v z G E E 6.q .(PL W WE L V VN10.M¢ 4 4 \ "m r O L C 7? 4 2 C O N i^ y J Q O ^ L `.E• WS d � �+ W n c `¢ rn ` r`• N 3 w U2 t K d F yW aW N \ ev) w 1 1 \ \'j'•I v� i s f 1J _ may: L CL•L xa� {L y m R 9 Y L L L Uy yE U.� p O ^ W Y o ag-y C V L 4 sy i1 O L t y Ey p u y o E Y q Va u m i a a a°c Go Y !E Ta L C t y L T yaw � C 6 U 6 U 6 6HU a i i "'�i w UD a i i "'�i w UD H }t R s ... M d! Al NG Ar d o .r 72ad.�¢ q 40. aN MwN %w L 6� � C� 6 Ty bTrm C y1, VC Nd �Lt MQ3 � �� Ott WAC oyF � >d.G.y � G4. 6N tC � C p. {+'"' � 111 b1tpi.11 ✓ N » C.0 y, 6 M A� ot Q s CR li b � SIW L dp0 'may L. °G Q GW+� Y M � Q b a Q a N d �.n V.. .y GyNS r C i z Kc° OA as ss Sir rN Od NiT y'� � _�•� A� L O s }{ u .�].M J� �♦h> C,a•G "] V C � dQ y, i"tJ ay, l' 'A JC W 4URV Qi� .Y Wry a MW.Xti }�. av H }t R fr DATE: TO: i FROM: BY: SUBJECT: I. Ell CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOI4CI A c ICA STAFF REPORT i p a t r O p F August 13, 1986 tsn Chairman and Members of the Planning Commi•�sion Brad Buller, City Planner Debra Meier, Assistant Planner PR 86 -52 - RISINGER - A consistency determi•,ation between e Foot-Efff-U-09-FlUor Interim Policies and a proposal to occupy an existing structure for the operation of retail floor covering sales in the General Commercial District located bt 8291 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 207- 113 -24. PROJECT Ai:D SITF. DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: The applicant has submitte, for Planning ommfsslon consideration a request Vor det rmination of consistency of a proposed retail use within the Foothill Corridor Study area. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North China Alley, Syca ;.-ore Inn; General Commercial Jouth - Sintle family residential, apartments and car wash; General Commercial, Medium Residcntiai (8 -14 du /ac) East - Commercial uses, General Commercial West - Commercial and Restaurant; Genera'. Commercial C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Commercial North - Commercial South - Commercial, Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac) East - Commercial West - Commercial D. Site Characteristics: The site is on a lot of a triangular s ati�e o- approximately 1E,000 square feet in size at the intersection of San Bernardiio Road with Foothill Boulevard. There is an existing structure that was most recently used as a swimming Poo; sales Iffice. The remainder of the size is 0 ack top s!irfare with some area for landscaping at the far eastern portion of the lot. There is some existing curbing around perimeter of site but no parkway landscaping or other improvements. The minimum site area in General Commercial Districts is 40,000 square feet with minimurl width and depth of ITEM R tiff PLANNING COMPASSION STAFF REPORT August 13, 1986 PR 86-52 - Risinger Page 2 175 feet and 200 feet, respectively. Along Foothill Boulevard, the landscape setback is 45 feet regardless of parcel size. Therefo?e, the existing site and Improvements are non-conforming. This site is located in a study area along Foothill between San Bernardino Road and Red Hill Country Club Drive that i-, made up of many small non - Conforming lots (see Exnibit 'B"). Located on this block is the Magic L"p and Vince's Spaghetti Restaurants. Immediately to the west is a power too] sales and repair shop under the same land ownership. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: • This yWm came to our atterstion in early June through rou tine Code "Enforcement inspection which noted site improvement activities taking place without prior Planning Division approval or business license at this address. The Officer left his card on the premises or more than one occasion requesting property owner and other involved parties to contact the Planning DIVIsion, for further infoymation. Rainbow Floor Covering, represented by owner Scott Rising r, suhmitted a letter (see attached) on June 24, 1986 describln;., on--site improvements and future intent to develop the property. On July 23, 1986, the Planning Division received a* signed application to begin preliminary processing and scheduled this item for Planning Commission review. The applicant indicates in his letter that to date they have pairtc-I the buildings., re-surfaced the black-top area and striped t4e parking 1. B. Land Use: The applicant has I ndicated *he would like to use the ex- isflnq —structure for floor covering sales and carpet cleaning which is a permitted use under the Development Code and the Interim Policies at this location. However, Ws site is lacking in many, site improvements required for - -Aercial use. Such improvements would Inciude landscaping of all setbacks, and parkways, a trash enclosure, hzindicap access and parking, drainage facilities, additional right-of-way dedication and street Improvements. The interim policies are an attempt tG combine these complex issues dealing with land use, urban design, traffic and ci.1culation to achieve the following goal: a high quality, attractive,. and unifying design image reflective of community heritage, and Provide a viable settiikq for a balanced mixture of residential and commercial activities with safe and efficient traffic circulation and access." Aft� UK Alm", I E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT August 13, 1986 PR 86 -52 - Risinger Page 3 C. Master Plan The purpose of the Master Plan is to provide for ntei�"egrate5— development at the Earliest possible time in the review process. Master planning of defined areas will avoid development of single parcels of land in ; manner which precludes future development of adjacent parcels in the hest way possible. Therefore, site development of this small parcel may preclude an opportunity to coordinate the land use and site planning for qualit; development consistent with the standards for Foothill Boulevard, which is to de- emphasize strip commercial by creating organized groups of structures and uses, and provide for efficient utilization of land. The applicant has indicated a desire to construct a new building on this site within two years. III. CONCLVION: Its simile;, cases along Foothill Boulevard, the �ss�:on has consistently stated that it is preferable for applicants to postpone costly site improvements until completion of the Foothill Specific Plan. Therefore, the following options can be considered: 1. Submittal of a complete application for Development Review to fully upgrade the site to Foothill Boulevard Developmer.+ Standards prior to occupancy. Z. Determine that this request does not meet tte goals and policies of the Foothill Corridor and that any sate improvements he discouraged until the Foothill Plan is compete and a plan is submitted consistent with the Foothill Specific Plan. Ii+. RECOMMENDATION, Staff recommends the Planning Commission consider all inpu an estimony regarding this item and provide direction to the applicant in regard to proceeding with the request. R£speptfully at�nit`.ted, Brad Bu11eo City Planner BB:DM:dak Atta0,onts: Applicant's Letter Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Study Area 12- — y .. bi i _ - T !11NBONN' FLOC. k CO- VERING & RUG CLEANERS 177 Woodla%vn St., Bldg. F -2. Upland. Calif. 91786 ; n ( 7141 981 -4989 (714) 981 -4980 Mena to: F.. uning Cosmissjpga Rambo Cucamonga From: Rainbow Plobr Coveriiij & carpet Cleaners'.&,Byers D-As: June 24, 1966 k Subjects Building'iuPr: vsmn v on 8291 Foothill Cucanongs, It has beat. requested that. Rainbow �>>�loor Covertag s>zbar t a letter to the city of Rancho We u6ottg>i on beha f of property awtfer .�Taiut Upton, detailing they 3mpravements and fitt?re glans of the abov4 logAtion• I hzve attached szhi'bit R for your infermation and review to enable the coeaission to: viow, tbek property: impr*vs=nta more aleaOv. Ths ,following 1810, list of Improvements that We have vadr in an effort to present ourselves bsfore the public in the City of Rsnaho Cucawnga in a professional. wanner. - Plantod Plovers ate;. -jhrcbs - Re/blaoktop - Parking stripes Painted building inside and outside e - Carpet Floors a , It is arc i4ention to construct a new building an this property to t snit our grr wth : id the Imblia needs, sithin. &Wg , t littsljr two years. Z ac sure that the rowdesion and the public 111M. agree that .'w.hts property has been in need of some tender loving ci"v for-quite somotim.- .4 - We at Raissbow, Intend to blend our efforts into the.otandards of this -proud coxamity. Respectfully, _ ._.. Scott L. Risinger (owner) �.w 3 ;1 5iG1� 2 E L.TG —a a DMVE _ -1-RED HILL G"TRY C1- 3 raj 1 a• Y Avto 9z la R `:✓ •� B �. \ '�` + 'f, '+` :�. Olt- 44 i` s�'�• �A• V ® h� 'Sa y`K''. Q 47 zo O J j� p yi •41 V E E G) l•:.: 49 " �ii .54 t iJ itXr r 3S 40 SQ O . ✓F } a i I k I�IOR i H rt RANCHO CUEAMUNGA rrrLE: adV 4?—ew PIAANNING DIVI.50N �'�� EXHlBfT —�` SG1x - — r ,i i 2 -- CITY OF RANCHO GUC°AMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 13, 1986 TO: Chairman and 'IemberS of the Planningg Commission FROM; Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Assistant Planner 9, �• i 7 C .t .r.. `[7 o $ z ' > SUBJECT: MINOP DEVELOPMENY' REVIEW 86 -09 - GROATc- Appeal of Staff's decision enying he jns a aft =54f a satellite dish antenna on the side of T.he. Exchange ilding located at the southeast :orner of Carnelian Street and Baseline Road. APN: 207- 031 -28. 1977 I. BACKGROUND: As a reluit of code enfr°rcement, Mr. Johf, Groat su iFi e a Minor Development review application n May 6, 1986, for -n existing satellite dish antercna. The dish is located on the southwest building elevation approximately 12 feet above the ground. The. dish is 6 feet n diameter. Staff denied the Minos. Developme. Review application on July 7, 1986. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: Based upr. -1 view of the =request and field i—nspe'cHron, Staff determine that the locatll,A of the satellite dish antenna was not in ctmipliance with the Development Code, The development Code building design guidelines, Section 17,0.060, states that _v equiPment, whether on the roof, on the side of the building, or or; the ground, shall be screened. The method of screening shall be architecturally integrated in terms of material, color, shape and size. The screening design shall blend with the buildirg design. The antenna, at its present location cannot be screened from Public view or architecturally integrated ir`o the overall design of the building. Staff feels that the satellite. '' yi+ antenna should be ground mountc3 •vnere adequat6 screening can be provided trough landscaping and /or wall ?S,_ Botn the dish and the brat.ing network are painted a tan cold similar to the color of the bui" iii ng. _11EM S 'p Iry a PG,9 HNG k 5E 5 ^aREP6AT 3� August 13, 1.9136 r MDR 86 -09 - Groat. Page 2 `i B. Design Review Committee: On June 19, 1986, the Design Review ,ommi tee rev.tewe t .e request for' the satellite dish antenna and determined that the proposal was incorsi -scent with the Development Code; The he recomiended that the satellite dish antenna should be ground mounted with appropriate screening provided, III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS:, The proposed project is not consistent with e o6je— -y'es o he Development Code, and the purposes of the • district in which the site is located. 'Also, the proposed project is not in compliance with each of thP_ applicable provisions of the Development Code. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission r defer—mine that the dish antenna, in its present location and design, is inconsistent with tha intent of the Development Code and direct the applicant to revise`nis application to ground mount the antenna with appropriate screening. If the applicant is unwilling to ground mount the antenna and properly screen it, Staff Would recommend denial, k Res fully s `tied Brad Buller r City Planner BB:SM:dak Attachments: Exhibit "p" - Letter of Appeal Exhi!?it 118" - Letter of Denial (July 7, 1986) Exhibit "C" - Letter from Applicant (May 29, 19861 - Exhibit "D" - Letter Dated May 21, 1986 Exhibit "E" - Site Plan July 9, 1986 Mr. Scott Murphy 9320 Baseline Road Suite C Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 SUBJECT: Minor Development Review 86 -09 •- Satellite Dish Antenna Deat Mr. Murphy: In response to your letter of July 7, 1986 I should, at this time, request an appeal b,!� filed with the City Planning Commission pertinent to the above subject. Due to prior commitnants I will not be available to appear in p4rson until after the first of August 1986. 1 would greatly appreciate a hearing date sometime thereafter. . I apologize for all the problems that have been created over this itstallation and -Dray that it can be resolved at our next meeting. Enclosed please find a check in the ar4ount of $62.00 to cover the appeal fee. gPnW RECEIVED -- CI y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Jci Groat PCANN!NG fl1Y1SSON R Vice President JWGf st JUL 1 19$6 p119 7181%101111211121814A6 7365 Carnelian, Suite 212, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 - (714) 989.8220 Representing Massachusetts Indemnity and WO Insurance Company, Atlanta, GA First American National Securities Inc. c�c•�.�ro .a �,..• CITE' OF RANCHO CUCAM®NGA m.— Jeffrey, King ' — • ' 1� Charles J. Bu uct 1I Jon D. Mikels Richard K Dahl' Pamela J. Wright July 7, 1986 t John Groat 7365 Carnelian Street, Suite 212 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 t , SUBJECT: MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86 -09 - SATELLITE DISH ANTENNA jDear Mr. Groat: fAt our meeting of June 10, 1986, Brad Buller, the City Planner, informed You that he would be referring 10� your request to install a satellite dish antenna on the side of your commercial building to the Design Review Committee r for further analysis. On June 19, 1986, the Design Review Committee reviewed your request and determined that the proposal was inconsistent with the Development Code. The - Committee stated that the satellite dish antenna should be ground anted with appropriate screening provided. Therefore, Minor Development Review 86 =09 has been denied. The denial of your Minor Development Review application will become final unless an appeal is filed within ten (10) days of 'he date of this letter. The appeal be must filed with the Secretary of the Planning Commission in writing, together with a $62.00 appeal fee. If you should have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, COMMUNII DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNIN D ION r 1 Murphy Assistant Plann SM:ns ,a 9320 BASELINE ROAD, SUITE C • POST OFFICE BOX 807 • RANCHO CUCAMONO BOX A, CAJ.iYCRNLR9I730 s (714) 989 -1851 r'A I U111 I §AkW rm Originally I, oblivi {ius of regulations, had the dish installed on the south -and of the building here at 7363 Carnelian, It was during installation that I was apprised by a field inspec- tor from your department that I needed a minor development review to be in compliance with �_ity ordinance. Had i known that this was a requirement, I most certainly would have taten the necessary steps to see that it was complied with prior tC any work effort toward installation. Having been advised, I immediately sub;nit- ted, to the planning commission office, a sketch (3 copies) along with a check in the amount of $62.00 of which I was given a receipt number 34608 dated May 6, 1986. I was told by Mr. Scott Murphey, of your department, that I sh.fl;:ld be tearing within a few days with reference to your department's decision. The next communication was in the Form of your letter dated May 21, 1986, suggesting that I comply with Section 17.10.060 6f the development code. Our conversat -n of today's date allowed me to better Lnderstand the code. I would ask that due to a number of circumstances the satellite dish be allowed to remain where and as it was installed. These circumstances are as follow6 7365 Carnelian, Suite 212, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 - (714) 989.8220 Representing Massachusetts indemnity and Life insurance Company, Atlanta, GA First American National Securities Inc. X'n i sa¢l R EC C- i v E D CITY OF t ..... CU 'A.U'0fYGA PLANNING plNSlON �j J'JN 3 1986 -- yy.... let •{ ttit� YVjP. C Y`D�vi May 29 1486 AiS PM "�181°�110gIIi3Z ;1t243s4t516 tou 46— Mr. Brad Buller .��„ Qty aP�'uto�. City Planner 9320 Baeline Rd., Suite Cj �} 14* Cwaj- / Rrancho Cucamonga, California 91730 rftf. y i\S{ Dear Mr. Buller: Z'3 I wish to thank yot: for spending some of your valuable time with me explaining the thinking of your department with reference "r to the satellite dish. Originally I, oblivi {ius of regulations, had the dish installed on the south -and of the building here at 7363 Carnelian, It was during installation that I was apprised by a field inspec- tor from your department that I needed a minor development review to be in compliance with �_ity ordinance. Had i known that this was a requirement, I most certainly would have taten the necessary steps to see that it was complied with prior tC any work effort toward installation. Having been advised, I immediately sub;nit- ted, to the planning commission office, a sketch (3 copies) along with a check in the amount of $62.00 of which I was given a receipt number 34608 dated May 6, 1986. I was told by Mr. Scott Murphey, of your department, that I sh.fl;:ld be tearing within a few days with reference to your department's decision. The next communication was in the Form of your letter dated May 21, 1986, suggesting that I comply with Section 17.10.060 6f the development code. Our conversat -n of today's date allowed me to better Lnderstand the code. I would ask that due to a number of circumstances the satellite dish be allowed to remain where and as it was installed. These circumstances are as follow6 7365 Carnelian, Suite 212, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 - (714) 989.8220 Representing Massachusetts indemnity and Life insurance Company, Atlanta, GA First American National Securities Inc. Mr. Brad Buller' 2 _ May 29, 1986 1, Safety Great consideration was taken in seleeting the material for installation. The unit is installed with. I" r st <el rods compressing the outside facia reinforced with i "" angle iron and mounted so as ',o stay behind the walkway r_ and above a 121 'height, 2. Aesthetically, it was positioned so that in a short period of time the braking network will be obscured by the growth of greenery, and materials that tied the brackets and other ` parts have been painted to blend as closely with the colors r of the building. $_ 3. The pupose of the satellite is purely , educational. 'This r dish is picking up a signal from a satellite so!4ewhere over the equator, being beamed from AtlF;nta, Georg,i�_, for educa- tional purposes on7.y. It is a continued source of training allowing our agents to become more professional in the com- munity. 4. After having discussed the possibility of relocating with Mr. Crowell, the owner, it i0p.ears and is indicated that where the satellite exists. is a far more acceptable area than any other ground or post, mounted,' slab mounted position, etc., that they could recommend. 5. Had 1 known, to reiterate, the requirei;r6nts by the city for the positioning of the satellite dish I would have most certainly avoided any complications. Please realize that movement of the dish will not only interrupt the beamed signal and our :raining programs but will afford considerable expense somewhere in the amount of $2,000.00. It is, therefore, with the aforementioned information and my sincere apologies for having been ignorant of the city code, that I request your reconsideration and that of your department n the matter of relocating the satellite dish. I mish to thank you in advance for your time and effort in arriv- ing at a fair and just decision in this matter. Sin eirely J n W. Groat egional Vice President JWG /st 01�:i �> r' d GLO,�,C CITY OF RANCHO CUC.AMCONGA. K Mara Jeffrey King z f- {Z z Cnunri6n<nrCr» U a Charles J. Buquet R Jon D. Mikels 1977 May 21, 1986 Richard M. Dahl Pamc[a J. Wright John Croat 7365 Carnelian Street, Suite 212 Rancho Cucamonga, California 9173G SUdJECY. MINOR DEVEL3PMENT REVIEW 86 -09 - SATELLITE DISH ANTENNA r Dear Mr.. Groat: Staff has completed their review of the above referenced project. At this time, Staff feels that the satellite dish antenna is not in compliance with the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. Section 17.10.050 of the Development Code req;aires that all equipment, whether an the roof, the side of the building, or ground, shad be screened. The method of screening shall be archi'tectural'ly integrated in terms of material, color, shape, and size. The screening design shall blend with the building design. In Staffs opinion, the dish, at its present location, cannot be screened from public view so as to re architecturally integrated into the overall design of the building. Staff feels that the satellite dish antenna si,ould be removed from the side of the building and ground mounted where adequate screening can be provided. Revised plans should be submitted to this office for further review no later than June 5, 1956. If you should have any further questions, please do not hesitate to- contact Scott Murphy of this office at (714) 989 -1861. Scott is available to meet with you and review your proposal cr discuss alternatives should you desire. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PL11NNING DIVi I1N BRACE BULLER City Planner BB: Sri'i: das cc: Richard Crowell Joe Torrez, Community Code Representative IS-9 t�W'1461r JD 9320 BASELINE ROAD, SUITE C e POST OFFICE BOX 807 • RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CAUFFORNIA 91730 a (714) 989 -18$1 0 9 r� -1 =.d.) NURTFJ, CITY or, RANCHO CUCAI IONGA TrrLE... PLANNING Dr%TISIO.N S-g�- rAniiBiT: 0 SC,',LE- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF RE PORT August 13, 1386. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Nancy Fong, Associate Planner APPEAL OF THE UNIFOIAM SIGN PROGRAM FOR HAVEN VILLAGE e ue reqs to appeal _ the conditions approva or a Uniform Sign ."" imposed by the City Planner for the major tenants within the Haven Villa -e Shopping Center located at the northeast corner of Have Avenue and Highland Avenue. I. ABSTRACT: The major tenant, Lucky Stores, is appealing the con > ion of approval, imposed by the City Planner, requiring the elimination of 3 extraneous informational Nail signs such as "Deli ", "Liquors', and "Bakery ", staff recommends the Planning Commission uphold the City Planner`s decision to conditionally approve the Uniform Sign Program for Haven Village Shopping. Center. II. BACKGROUND: On Aoril 24, 1985, the Planning Commission, at its pu i c .earl ng, conditionally approved Conditional Use Permit 84_31 for a 15 acre integrated shopping center located at the northeast corner of Highland and Haven Avenue. The conditions of approval require that: "Uniform Sign Program shall establish uniform size, placement and single color for tenants. 'Major tenants may have variation in size, placement, and color; provided that no more than three colors shad be permitted within the program (except for logos). The developer, Diversified Properties, has been working with staff in developing a Uniform Sign Program in compliance with the conditions of approval. On June 30, 1936, the City Planner conditionally approved the Uniform Sign Program as shown in Exhibit "E". III. ANALYSIS: A. Representatives of Lucky Stores requested that information such as "Deli", Bakery Liquor signs be allowed as part of the i wall sign as shown n Exhibit "D', since the maximum allowable sign area is 150 square feet. The reason is to emphasize to their customers that they do have these specialty departments within the supermarket. Also, not all of their stores have those specialty departments. ITEM T DATE: TO: FROM: ' BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF RE PORT August 13, 1386. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Nancy Fong, Associate Planner APPEAL OF THE UNIFOIAM SIGN PROGRAM FOR HAVEN VILLAGE e ue reqs to appeal _ the conditions approva or a Uniform Sign ."" imposed by the City Planner for the major tenants within the Haven Villa -e Shopping Center located at the northeast corner of Have Avenue and Highland Avenue. I. ABSTRACT: The major tenant, Lucky Stores, is appealing the con > ion of approval, imposed by the City Planner, requiring the elimination of 3 extraneous informational Nail signs such as "Deli ", "Liquors', and "Bakery ", staff recommends the Planning Commission uphold the City Planner`s decision to conditionally approve the Uniform Sign Program for Haven Village Shopping. Center. II. BACKGROUND: On Aoril 24, 1985, the Planning Commission, at its pu i c .earl ng, conditionally approved Conditional Use Permit 84_31 for a 15 acre integrated shopping center located at the northeast corner of Highland and Haven Avenue. The conditions of approval require that: "Uniform Sign Program shall establish uniform size, placement and single color for tenants. 'Major tenants may have variation in size, placement, and color; provided that no more than three colors shad be permitted within the program (except for logos). The developer, Diversified Properties, has been working with staff in developing a Uniform Sign Program in compliance with the conditions of approval. On June 30, 1936, the City Planner conditionally approved the Uniform Sign Program as shown in Exhibit "E". III. ANALYSIS: A. Representatives of Lucky Stores requested that information such as "Deli", Bakery Liquor signs be allowed as part of the i wall sign as shown n Exhibit "D', since the maximum allowable sign area is 150 square feet. The reason is to emphasize to their customers that they do have these specialty departments within the supermarket. Also, not all of their stores have those specialty departments. ITEM T PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Appeal of Uniform Sign Program for °x Haven Village Shopping Center August 13, 1986 Page 2 The Sign Ordinance states that "sign copy shall include minimal information only. The use of subordinate information, such as telephone nonbers, lists of products, pictures of product;,, etc. are discouraged. The name of the use of the business shall be the dominant message on the sigh." Therefore, the proposed additional 3 wall signs would appear to be extraneous and not in conpl iai ce with the intent of the Sign Ordinance. The Planning Commission: "s 'decision w.11 clarify this provision for future development. A brief survey of the shopping centers within the City yi el ds 16 centers as shown in Exhibit "Cl" and "C2 ". Some of the shopping centers were developed under the County codes while others were developed at the early years of City incorporation (from 1978 to 1980), the original Sign Ordinance was adopted in 1979, while the current sigt code was amended ir, 1983. Although all of the shopping centers have an approved Unl.forsn Sign Program, 14 of them were non- conforming as they were approved prior to 1983. The Alphas Beta Center, located at the northwest , orner of Base Line and Archibald, shows that both tlhe Alpha Beta zz:,. and Thrifty stor- have a second wall sign that advertises "Liquor=. 'this particulz center was developed under the County codes and prior to tht adoption of the current Sign Ordinance; therefore, the `Liquor" sign is non- conforming. The haven Village Shopping Center, the subject site for the appealed Uniform Sign Program, is the first major neighborhood shopping center to be developed. Approval of those three, extra wall signs would set a precedent for all future shopping centers in the laity. IV. RECOMNDATION. Staff recommends that ZG Planning Commission uph -old the onditions of Approval impy.,ed by the City Planner for the Uniform Sign Program for haven Village Shopping Center consistent with the intent of the Sign brdinanc!, and deny the appeal. ties fu 11y $u tted, Brad Bull r City Planner 88:NF.ns Attachments: Letter from Exhi bit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Lucky Store Requesting Appeal - Location Map - Detailed Site Plan - Locations of All Oth — Neighborhood Shopping Centers Iii birr the Citt - Proposed Lucky Sign.. - Approved Uniform Sign Program J r Aft 3 j �1 it lsouTHEM FOOD.OlV151 LUCKYSTORFS. WQ, 6565 KNOTTAVENUE, P.o. BO%500f, 8UENAPAFK.L'ALIF05NIw M_-M ,a July 16, 1986 d J. Chairman & Urban Planning Commm,ssion 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C Rancho CUCamonga, California 91730 Attention: City'Planner Subjectr Sign Program Appeal Dear "irc We ask that you please reconsider the possibility of leaving ;. the words - "Bakery" "Deli" &' "Liquor" - as a part of the overall building sign package. We would like to emphasize to our customers that we have these z specialty departments. Not all of our stores ;ia a all three departments and it is for that reason that we f od it necessary to indicate to our cus- tomers that we are meeting their needs. Sincerely, LUCKY STORES, INC. Southern Food Division Isaac Chavez, Project Engineer IRC:th — REi✓L- NED-- ji cc: File PIANN1, DI`J151 NGNGA JUL 1 � 1913'r3 pitl �'gs9i10��?�11�? :2l��a�516 16 El MIN2AV 04Y-MR o 9��.r�.7P°• __ zr7�r _ ice^ `' � ^'�`s...,.y.. -+ _ ..,. ,.,.. ..�'� _ 3 EXHIBIT C1 Aft LOCATION OF SHOPPING CENTERS PROJECT SIGN PROGRAM NAME OF CENTER ' LOCATION APPR. DATE APPR> DA'L'E Alta Loma Square '3EC IM & Carnelian DR 78 1978 (Van s) Rancho Plaza NWC 19th & Carnelian CUP 79.01 1978 (Bob's) .4 Alta Loma Plaza SEC 19th & Carnelian County 1979 (Alpha Beta) Rancho Cucamonga SWC 19th & Carnelian SA 79 -14 ? Plaza ' Stater Brothers NEC 19th & Archibald County 7 li Sunrise SWC Base Line & Carnelian coun�y ? Stater Brothers NEC Base Line & Carnelian CUP 84 -32 1985 I (Renovation) Alpha Beta Center I NWC Base Line & Archibald County 1980 s g Base Line Village SWC Base Line & Archibald County ? �Q Albertson's SEC Base Line & Archibald 7 1978 Sycamore Inv. NEC Base Line & Arrhibaid CUP 84 -13_ 1985 Perry's Market Sis Foothill between Nelms DR 79 -23 1979 & Mal achi to Rancho Square 9838 Foothill CUP 80 -02 1980 Rancho Towne 9080 Foothill CUP 79 -01 1981 Center (Ganco) Miller's Outpost NEC Archibald & Foothill DR 83 -26 1983 -Mart NEC Haven & Arrow OR 83-33 IS35 (K (EX4phJk�h) I iG 11 u NORTH CITY OF MUM. RANCHO CLCATMONGA TE7 PLANNING D RWONT a 3 • _ I _ IL ry `X m 3 o r d - .J $$ C L•- gal F% I Y� H 41 owl � l i I HAVEN VILLAGE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA i SiGN CRITERIA F These criteria have been established for the purpose ef maintaining a continuity of quality and aesthetics throughout the shopping center for -`he mutual benefit of all tenants, and to comply with the regulations of i e City of R -incho t;2aamonga. Conformance will be strictly enforced, and any installed nonconforming or unapproved signs must be brought into conformance at the em.pense of the tenant. f' GENERAL EQU R tM h ?4 A. Each tenant shall submit or cause to be submitted to the landlord, for approval, prior to fabrication., four (4) copies of detailed drawings indicating the Jxation, size, layout, design, color, illuminitlon, materials, and metlnd of attachment. B. Ali permits for signs and their installation shall be obtained by the tenant or his representative. All signs !ball be constructed and installed at the I-enant "s expense. D. Tenant shall be responsible fo, the fulfillment of all requirements and Specification, including those of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. E. All signs shall be reviewed for conformance with these c:lteria and overall design quality. /Approval or alsapproval of sign submii-tals based on aesthetics of design shall remain the right of the landlord or his authorized representative, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. E w SiGK �° instaItatlon all d Y ?age opsiblf ford t rs sign rasp u d tenant shall be stgn. :oho +- �;ndtoed.shalt In�enanGe �enanfi of hie or repairs aid E• mat m t:�tenanaeten noktce '° Ada sacra. iandlord urse require s wr tatt to ail t inv°'►ce• fi�na� s 3Q da Shnut d tenant d tenant s ecet P or repBIV" aka, repatrc�ad4ys fir on' r Shai land) rd withit`tpn tS icree'stcndi ng is of single Pureth the architeGirrm Sign f , tenant enSurate wt , to ht- UnifP f Signing sub ,lec+ t ,m_ G. hulidin9s shall and shall be the bulid�n� of Criteria• ¢LL- tdvised these signs are evert r manufacture th urchaser w'et`s by t)• 'antes bidding fig' be accepted by and aPPa tficstions ` r Cam, utes will ecifiFation "these sP AI' substit to the.sP. t same. ncsu it-, hied Any evtation from ` that I- d accept unless and tenant• rs reYu$a1 TO tanca and cnaY result St► war °hser riot to accep conformance advised the' P acted for Any signs unit will be 1-%sPe I Per' manufaCtt esach e d and removed at Ai1a1 payment, repre5entativbof ey ®cte f t n a, author i zed ance w i 11 found not i n CO be.orm te'tan'hr� eXF i IQAl012 � as dibte stgns'�tii be A• SNo animated• fla$htng ermltied• Permitted. will be p Z• exposed lamps or tlnstd t,tlon shall Comply Nc electrical ,andtheirdCn9 Codes, All signs local bull with aii Ordinance' toed• and. Sign 111 be i;erm 4, do P°rtabl e 'signs w sales signs shall and opening ar�itY oft RancNO t:ucsmon9a 5• Gr 1� with the comp ce• Sign Crdinana J SIGN CRITERIA Page 3. 6. No exposed crossovers or conduct will be permitted. Raceway shalt be exposed and painted (Dunn Edwards Q4-73X) to match adjacent bP-:.m at retail s shops (no exposed Raceway at free standing buildings.) 7. All cabines, conductors, transformers and other equipment shall be concealed. B. Painted fettering will not be ;permitted. 1. All signs or devices advertising an individual use, business or building shall be attached to the building at the location directed by landlord and and In accordance with the Uniform Sign Program. s A. At! tenants shall utilize one of the two letter Myles as shown In Exhibit "g ", except for is L•,,,: " and Payless. B. Maximum width shall be equal to 70% of the lineal leased frontage and centered horizontally on the demised premises, unless otherwise directed by landlord. Signage for major tenants: total sign area shall not exceed one and one -half square feet per lineal foot of leased premises frontage ur 150 square feet maximum whichever Is less. C. Letter height shall be 24t1 maximum unless tenant's name cannot be a_comodated at that size, in which instance smaller (ette;s may be approved ,'18" minimum), except for major tenant:. Copy shall observe the base line at shown in the exhibit "B". D, Tenants with two (2) frontages shall be allowed two (2) signs; each sign shalt be equal to 70% of each.lineal leased frontage. Further, the maximum sign area shall not exceed 10% of the bldg face or 150 Square Feet, whichever is less. Signs shall be composed of individual fetters on a raceway as shown In Exhibit "A ". Sign cabinets will not be permitted. E. Logos shall not exceed 10% of sign area and will be included in the allowable'signage subject to criteria file. F. Colors will be either (i) Plex Red 2793 (2) Plex Whlte W-7328 d may not duplicate the sign color used by adjacent stores except &t landlords discretion. Signage for major tenants: total sign area shall not exceed one and one -half square feet per lineal foot of leased premises frontage or 150 square feet maximum whichever is less. Color for major tenant letter shall be red and exempted from the two designated letter sizes. rt� ; � �,.:. s r, fsenr,�" "'".q:� "�p� .;R.�" q' ^^° -rte:. - n•'�c-�x;}p.���� ��:. �� SIGN CRITERIA Page 4 G. ' No more IF than 3 signs - combination of wail and monument signs arc allowed.' To Identify any or business within Rancho Cucamonga Village. H. Sign copy shall Include minimal information only The mama of the stores or business shall be the dominant message, on the sign, I. Plastic surfaces: P,oh;n & Haas Companyis Plexlglass, manufactured for orstdoor advertising displays, shall be used for letter faces, In colors noted 3/1614 thlck. J. Trimcap retainers shall be used at the perimeter of sign. letter faces, (3/4" Gold) IN. �ONSTRUCTIbN4 ilR r1CNt;i A. Aft exterior signs shall be secured by concealed fasteners, starnless-steel or nickel or cadmium plated. B. All exterior signs exposed to the weather shall be mounted at least 3/4" from the building to permit proper dirt:and,water drainage. C. All signs shaft be fabricated using full welded construction. 1 D. All signs shall be connected to Junction box provided by landlord and connected to landlord's house panel. Final hook up and connectlnns by tenant's sign contractor. E. All penetraflont; of the building structure required for sign Installation shall be neatly sealed in--a wafter tight condition. F. Unuerwritar's Gabel required on all signs. G. No labels or other identification will be permitted can the exp,�sed surface of signs except those required by local ordlnace which shall be applled In an inconspicuous .location. ' H., Sign contractor shall repair any damage caused by his work. Damage to structure that Is not repaired by the sign contractor shall become the tenant's responsibility to correct. I. Tenant shall be fully responsible for the operatic, of his sign contractors, and shall Indemnify, defend -ind ."tot , the partln; '•r aless from damages or I labiGities on account thereof, •, 0 �J SIGN CRITERIA Page 5 ,l V. SzU�L�1tE1= A. Entire display shal'j be guaranteed ;or one (1) year from datc on InstaIIatIon- against defects in material and workmanship. Defective parts shall be replaced;; without charge. V1. i NSt1RANC� A. Sign company shaft carry workments compensation. and Public ItabllIty Insurance against all damage suffered rr: or done to any and all persons and/or property white_; engaged In the construction or erection of sip- in the amount of a1,00,000 per occurence. ,. VI 1. I N;zTA ATi O i A. Tenants sign contractor shall completely Install and f, connect sign display and primary wiring at sign location stipulated by landlord. All signs will be wired to Haven Village house panel for uniform control of hours of M umination.- B. Landlord reserves the -might to hire an Independent electrical engineer tat tenant's sole expense) to lnspect" the Installation of all tenant signs and to requira the tenant to have any discrepancies and /or code violations corrected at the tenant's expense. 'V 1 i I. �j1D__�R__t`ANOPY S f ,NS A, Shop tenant shall Install an non - illuminated under canopy sign, In with accortance tine enclosed exhibit which shall be located as shown in exhibit 18211, i B. Ono under canopy sign shall be allowed per tenant. 0 �J WIR SIGN CRITERIA Page 6 iX. " MISCELLANEOUS RE,Qui h1 'T A. Each tenant shall ba permitted to placq -upon each entrance of its demised premises -not more than,144 square inches of vinyl,- Scothcai 1355A gold lettering not to exceed two (2) ' Inches rn height, indicating hours of busuness, emergency telephone numbers, etc. S. Except as provided herein, no {advertlsing plaeards, :banners, +,pennants, names, inslQpfai, trademarks, or V+her descriptive material, sh4l,i be afflixed 'or maintaPned upon either the lntarlor or exterlor of ;•N,vglass panes and supports of the show windows and.. db&-s, or,upon the exterior walls cf the buildings. C. Tenant shall not place afi7 signs on the rear of the premises or any secondary receiving }i ors. D. At the expiriation, or sooner terminatlon of tenantfs lease term, tenant shall be required to remove11's signs and patch the canopy and fascia and paint the patched area to match the sw,rounding area. X. MGNUMENT SIGN A. A monument sign indentifying tho name of the center and two major tenants shall be designed by the Common Area Architect and shall be subject to the approval of the Parties and City of Rancho Cucamonga, as show in Exhibit ".E ". B. A maximum of two monument signs are allowed for this devidlopment at one monument sign per street frontage. Service station gasoline pricing sign is excluded from this criteria and shalt be subject to separate, review and approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Servlce station gasoline pricing sign shall be consistent with the design /materlals of the monument signs as shorn in Exhibit 'IF". F3 3 � a� dam\ } i � }�} � � } ��. ¥ ... T- ( � . � � @ @ c @ c . L) • ..: E . g @ 73 . . ;cn N .z . 0 . �g=: . P CL 0 - - rIOYV.J e e� �1 t- iS -z!= Q, _a V =� g ee•`at W tip,, tty d� m _X Ix LLB r i T, o r.! EXHIBIT "B2" j_E� `t Td? �c !- •% !` � � .-#'t • �c�- Fes••; p� - ��r,��- , UZI 'r•� Saco �%�c}Go'Jr7si � �� - �/ - it x- _ •. \O/,S,f�l���"'G • L�� P�.i���OL�I�J S?'-;�1- l T, o r.! EXHIBIT "B2" j_E� a� °e f— k ilia _D A f -1 El" Lj tj IIj 1 �4 r1 � 0 s r r ou A .gam .'• Lij ` I a� °e f— k ilia _D A f D �E 7 i ia- J L Q y �1 w� C 3 { J �9 "A �' 101 Q td V V U '1 .� �� to I j k1 ems✓ 0 LU 3 C 10 z vs a � Y a Q� v I A+ W a :i ho d ` N to to c s; w U U5 GI a Q H 1 y l ° q W; t u i S b� V !{ W 4 3 a sr— 5 0 LU 3 C Ic U- E o c X LU ------------- zi X LU S l �,r _�R� '�• -�—.: ..,� S'�s.. �-,•,, . yam... � ... ...,i .,,+ �>�`^r••••.��, �•.«.r.... .. a t jj rf 'wee �s ra���.3�.�xC7a '°' ria,'^+�^•oKa. � '^r11➢ } "�'�' i' . -;4il '36���ri.�.tr. rluA1'�QSr �t'yo�_�•^�^ '�"• : t , TL +�.�.' t �t. i OEE41�id,.Art'-i� ! ,as•.� -••n •n ©n•rn�� • � h, Q.. 0 It }I W E _ %- \ rr„ .._y, .`• _ n �� - F ,may i. ` �� j a ',e_i � "3` '' ��.,= i•E�",` •-ice 1�' � ' Al ul im\ 4 ! ! a L71 7r Mf 1a 4 r t �`�_ / , '� �:.• �'t•'t ; _! �.�; � :Pig I I �l •�� __,.-. � t�,� � �4 �. X01,. €1f� t� e�t�� •� •� •3 — a:ia..'• _'-fie j��� ;�'L - Le ! 1 ± 11 7' Y JAY. si -ra'r /rri ,b ft l�I�ir, .fit- ,�,!► � '' - °. A t i Mosell S: Y. 1 iy E-1 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA f STAFF REPORT a a G ICA � Motic O 0 O n _F Z DATE: August 13, 1986 X1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Lisa Wininger, Assistant Planner ;OBJECT: NORTHTOWN PARK DENSITY O08US AGREEMENT I. ABSTRACT: This report is presented as = dvisory Item in conanctlon; with the public hearing for Development District Amendment 80" -02. The applicant has requested a density bonus which would allow an increase in the maximum allowabie residential density in exchange for - afforda�,,,e rental units for low and moderate income persons, in accordance with State law. This report will describe the parK acquisition project and outline the major points of the Density Bonus Agreement. The Commission is ask(-d to review and comment on the proposed Density Bonus which will be directed to 'the City Council at'the next hearing. II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The 13.5 acre project site is located on the south sr e o eron Boulevard, <east of Archibald Avenue (see Exhibit "A "). A General Plan Amendment from Low Densi Residential (2 -4- du /ac) 'to Low Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac) was approved for this site in April 1986. The site has long been identified by the community as an appropriate- .lncatirn for a neighborhood parkk of approximately 5 acres to serve the _;orthtown area which currently has no pedestrian acc, s to other neighborhood parks. The property owner has stated tnat she would consider - donating a five acre portion of the site to 0e City in exchange for specific off -site improvements and a density bonus of approximately twenty units over the maximum ai'.owable 68 units, in order to develop the remaining 8.5 acres. Staff has negotiated a Park Acquisition Agreement with the property owner. In exchange for the donation of the park site, the City will bear the cost of: 1. Installation of Master Plan Storm Drain facilities. 2. Installation of street improvements along the Feron Boulevard frontaga. ITEM U Mrr VL FLANNII i; JO ION, STAFF REPORT August 1.3, 1485 Northtown Park Density Bonus Agreement Page 2 3. Density bonus per the supplementary Density Bonus Agreement. The offsite improvements will be financed from the Redevelopment Agency's housing set asiue fund. The Park Acquisition Agreement will be considered by the city Council at their next hearing.'' I3:. DENSITY BONUS: Under State law, when a developer agrees to include ausing or ow and moderate income persons in a project, the City is required to provide a density , Uonus of at least 25% or provide other incentives of equal financi�rl value. The additional or "bonus" :snits are 'maintained as affordable to low and moderate incomes. The City is responsibile for ensuring tOat development standards are met and that the units remain affordable for a specific length of 'time. A Density Bonus Agreement is entered into, binding the developer to constructions of an affordable project in accordance with city standards in exchange for the City's conO tment to a specific number of additional units. The agreement for the Northtown site entitles the property owner /developer to the 25% density bonus, (rn additional twenty units) for a maximum Dotal of 88 units or gross density of about 10 units per acre (see attached). The key points on the City's part are: 1. Any project submitted for the site must receive such approvals as are required for ether development project's in the City, such as development review approvals or variances in order to achieve the maximitl+l -_ allowable densities. Such approvals are subject to the discretion of the Planning Commission. This allows the City to maintain its 'usual +;ontrols over design, product type ar.d site planning. 2. Affordable rents are defined as no more than 33% of the gross monthly income of the moderate income family of two as defined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development for this region. 3. Affordability: will be maintained for fifteen years. It is the property owner's responsibility to submit an annual report to the City demonstrating that the twenty affordable units have been rented to income qualified tenants. The standards are typical of other affordable projects in the area. U`2 i ;w PLAWING COMMS'SSION $TAFF REPORT r August 13, 1986 Northtown Park Density 8anus Agreement Page 3 a 3' .4 s The density bonus,-,is a key part of fine Park Acquisition Agreement. While/- fe City has not yet prepared .a Density,.Bonus Agreement as sucli -` the format anJ conditions relatin'q to site apprsvals and affordability are very similar to those found irr the Development A g reements for senior housing projects. Staff is in i thLI process of develGping specific guidelines for density onuses t for affordable projects and will be 'presenting these guidelines to the Convission for review shortly. At this time, Staff requests 4A comments, if any, from the Commission prior to consideration of this item by the City Council. ePL s c fully Bad Buller City Planner BBsLAW•.dak x: Attachments-, Bxh. bit Density &dnUs Agreement i i i I CL co M .pa�. .\nn GY!!- oirf ,. ux•r aPIN, - � 31saiao t �, Z. ' � 6iY�D8 My:.yiA'oOM /J/Y3iiy� lei ! NOWb'y - — ---�{- U -4( V tt__ it'� sops. yMi&l�Y a /.ON/ Htl ..1666'��• NOWb'y - — ---�{- U -4( DENSITY BONUS AGRt* MENT This Density Fonus Agreement is made and entered into by and between the City of Rancho Cucal onga ( "City" hereinafter) anal ( "Developer" hereinaftrri•). WITNESS ET H: A. Recital s. M California Gover:m►ent Code Section 65915 provides that %when a developer agrees to ;construct a housingg development including low or moderate income units, the City shall either (1), grant a density bonus of at least x twenty -five percent (25 %) over that allowed by the maximum density established in the Development Code and land Us- Element of the General Plan; or (2) provide other incentives of equal financial value. (i is The Developer is owner of certain real property within the City of Rancho Cucamonga and proposes to construct a residential project which includes low or moderate income units. Said project contemplated by Developer will require an increase in the maximum allowed density as provided in the Devel opment Code. (iii) It is the desire of the City to encourage developments desYgned to provide affordable dwelling units for residents of the City. In furtherance of that desire, the City is hereby willing to grant a density bonus to Developer as provided by the terns of this Agreement. t B. Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, thr City and the Developer do hereby agree as follows: Section 1_ Definitions and Interpretations. Unless otherwise expressly provided herein or unless the context thereof requires otherwise, the following teams shall have the respective meanings set forth below for all pur ,3oses of this Density Bonus Agreement. (a) "Affordable units" shall mean those units available for Qualified Tenants and equal to the number of additional units granted by this Density Bonus Agreement. (b) "Affordable rent" shall mean that amount as defined in California Health and Safety Code Section 50053, as said section are written at the time of executing this Agreement. As of the date of executing this Agreement, said Section 50053 provides as set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein. 0 U _s Density Bonus Agreement Page 2 (c) , "City" shall mean the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (d) "Development" shall mean the residentf:11, project which is to be l ocat -tt and constructed on that certain parcel of real property described in Exhibit "A", attached heretGi and incorporated by this reference. (e) "Qualified 'Project Period" means the first day on which the residential units in the Development are first available for occupancy and continuing for 15 years. (f) "Qualified Tenants" shall mean persons or families of low or moderate income as defined in California Health and Safety Code Section 50093, as said sections are written as of the time of executing this Agreement. As of the date of executing this Agreement, said Section 50093 provides as set forth in Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein. Section 2. Development Approval Condition. Approval of the density bonus agreement does not constitute approval of the required site plans, conditional use permits and /or any other discretionary approval authorized by the PianKng Camnission or City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This Agreement may be executed by the City and the Developer either prior to or concurrently with these approvals; however, as a specific condition of site plan approval and building permit r issuance, the Agreement shall be executed and recorded pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. This density bonus agreement applies on the developers intention that the affordable urits within the development shall be maintained as rental units. If prior to any discretionary approval on the development, the developer should Wer all or a portion of the affordable, units as provided herein as saleable units, the developer shall enter into a density bonus agreement to provide for tue maintenance of an affordable sales price on such sal eabl a units prior to any •discretionary approvals on the development. Section 3. Operation of Development. The Developer hereby agrees as follows: (a) For a period of fifteen (15) years following the commencement of the Qualified Project Period, the affordable rental units in the Development shall be occupied or held vacant and available for occupancy by Qualified Tenants at affordable rents. (b) If at any time during the Qualified Project Period the Developer may be unable to rent or lease the affordable units to Qualified Tenants, the Developer agrees to hold unrented and vacant said affordable units and to offer such affordable unit only for occupancy to Qualified Tenants as described in this Agreement. U -6 ry Density 13&.,`s Agreement Page 3 (c) "If at any time during, the Qualified Project Period a Quall`i -s- Tenant occupying an affordable rental unit should cease to be a Qualified` Tenant, the Developer may treat such tenant independent of this Agreement: If such a Qualified Tenant should cease to qualify pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, the Developer shall bold any then vacant utiit available for Qualified_ Tenarts at an affordable rent. If, however, at the time such Qualified Tenant ceases to be qualified pursuant to the terms of this Agreenent, there are no vacant units in the Developments the Developer sF it hold vacant the next available unit for occupancy by Qualified Tenants at an ` affordable rent. (d) That Developer shall coeirant as part of each rental or lease agreement with each new Qualified Tenant, that such Qualified Tenant shall not subl et sai d Of ordabl a urd t wi thout the express approval of Devel oper c- hi s representative and that Developer shall not allow any individual Qualified Tenant to so sublet in violation of the terms of this Agreement. (e) To prepare and submit to the City tn.thin 90 days following ti, beginning of the Qualifies! Project Period, and anMiilly upon such date, a;`` Certificate of Continuing Program Compliance executed by the Developer of its representatives, describing the name, address, and the Qualified Tenant status for each Qualified Tenant within the development so to insure compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. (f) That affordable units within the Development will be offered for rent or lease to Qualified Tenants an a first cone- firstserve basis and will be rented, leased, or sold to such Qualified Tenants without regard to race, color, religion, gender, marital status or national origin. Section 4. Density Bonus Pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, together with all terms and conditions of any applicable discretionary approval, the City hereby grants to the Develop— a twenty (20) unit increase in the otherwise maximum allowable .residen ,,:,41 density under the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code for a maximum total of eighty-eight (88) units. Section 5. Sale or Transfer of Development. The Developer hereby agrees that in the event of any sale, transfer or other disposition of the Development, or any interest therein, the Developer and the Purchaser /Transferee shall serve upon the City notice in writing that the Developer has fully explained the provisions of this Agreement to the PurchaserfTransferee and that the Purchaser /Transferee agrees to fulfill the Developers duties and obligations under this Agreement. E U Density Bonus Agreement Page 4 Section 6. Involuntary Loss or Substantial Destruction. Upon evidence satisfactory to the City that compliance wish the provisions of this Agreener_ is no longer possible due to substantial destruction of the Development, the Developer shall not be ;ubject to the terms of the provisions of this Agreement. In the event of any involuntary transfer or any seizure of Developer's interest in the Development, the terms and provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon such transferee, Section 7. Term. This Agreement shall become effective upon its execution by the parties hereto and its recordation as provided herein. Except as provided in the immediately proceeding section, this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect for the Qualified Project Period. Section 8. Conversion of Units If, after project approval for the development, the developer should desire to convert the affordable rental units as provided herein into saleable units, the developer shall, in addition to all conversion requirements of state and local law, enter into a density bonus agreement to provide for the maintenance of an affordable sales price on such converted affordable units as a specific condition precedent to the approval of any such conversion. Section 9. Covenants to Run with the Land. is The Developer hereby subjects the Development and the land described in Exhibit A " hereto to the covenants, reservations and restrictions as set forth in this Agreement. The City and the Developer hereby declare their specific intent that the covenants, reservations and restrictions as set : -orth herein shall be Oemed covenants running with the land and shall pass to ^nd be binding upon the Developer's successors and at Igns in title or intere,,, to the Development. Each and every contract, deed or other instrument hereinafter executed, covering or conveying the ievalopment or any portion thereof shall conclusively be +.� d to have begin executed, delivered ant accepted subject to the covenant„ reservations and restrictions expressed in this Agreement, regardless of whether such covenants, reservations and restrictions are set forth in such contract, deed or other instrument. Section 10. Burden and Benefit. City and Developer hereby declare their understanding and intent that the burden of the covenants, reservations and restrictions set forth herein touch and concern the land in that the Developer's legal interest in the Development is rendered less valuable thereby. The City and Developer hereby further declare their understanding and intent that the benefit of such covenants touch and concern the land by enhancing and increasing the enjoyment and use of the Development by Qualified Tenants, the intended beneficiaries of such covenants, reservations and restrictions, and by furthering the public purposes for which this Agreement is adopted. Further, the parties hereto agree that such covenants, res a vations ?nd restrictions benefit all other real property located in the City of Rand < Cucamonga. l/`9�- Density Bonus Agreement Page 5 Section 11. Scope. The covenants, reservations and restrictions described herein shall apply uniformly to the entire Development in order to establish and carry out a common plan for the use, development and improvement of the land on which the Development is to be constructed. Section 12. Default and Enforcement. If the Developer defa=ults iri the performance of observance of any covenant, reservation &r restriction 4i5 set forth in this Agreement, and if such default remains uncured for a pe-riod of 30 days after notice to the Developer or should the Developer not diligently and continuously prosecute such cure to the appropriate completion, the City may declare that the Developer is in default under the terms of this Agree -snt and may take any or more of the following steps at its option: (a) To bring any action or proceeding at law or in equity to require the Developer to perform its obligations under the terns of, tht; Agreeement or to enjoin the Developer from any acts which may be in violation of this Agreement. (b) To have access to inspect, examine and make copies of all books and/or records of the Developer pertaining to the Development. (c) To take whatever actions at law or in equity in the name of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as may appear necessary or desirable to enforce the obligations, covenants and agreements of the Developer pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. ' In the event the City brings an action or proLee A ng at law or it, equity to require the Developer to perform its obligations under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall recover from the Developer any and all costs and attorneys fees incurred therein. No delay in enforcing the provisions hereof as to any breach orviolation shall impair, damage, or waive the right of the City to enforce the same or to obtain relief for the continuation or repetition of such 61.ach . or violation or any similar breach or violation thereof at an, later time or times. Section 13. Indemnification of City. The Developer hereby agrees that it shall indemnify or hold harmless the City and its officers or employees from and against: (i) Any and all claims by or on behalf of any person arising from any cause whatsoever in connection with the Development; (ii) Any and all claims arising from any act or anission of the Developer, or any of its agents, contractors, servants or employees in connection with the development; and U —q " , y ti,enmi ty Bonus Agreement Page 6 I� iiii') All costsi attorneys' fees, expenses or liabilities incurred in cornectlon with any such claim or proceeding brought thereon. _ - -- In the event that any action or proceeding i s brought against the City or any of its officers or employees with respect to whirl~ indemnity may be sought hereunder, Developer, upon written notice from: the City shall assume the investigation and defense thereof., ncludinq the employment of counsel and the payment of all expense. The Developer and the City shall have the right 4* to Employ separate counsel in any such acts °on or proceeding and to participate in the investigation and defense- thereof and Developer shall pay the fees and expenses of any such separate counsel retained by the City. a Section 14. Recording and Filing. As a specific condf tvi on prior to the issuance of building permit on l `• ,he Development, the Developer shall cause this Agreement an?i any amendments or supplements ° thereto to be recorded and filed in conjunction with the Development in the office of the County Recorder, County of San Bernardino, ' ' and in any other such places as the City may reasonably request. Developer' shall pay all fees charges incurred in connection with such recording and ' filing. Additionally, the Developer shall provide the City with a conforrmed copy of the recorded Agreement prior to the issuance of building permits on the Development. _ Section 15. Governing Law. Californ:aThis Agreement shall be governed by' the laws rf the State of Section 16. Amendments. This Agreement ^ter be amended only by a written instrument executed by the parties hereto. Section 17. Notice. Any notice required to be given by the terms of this Agreement shaft be provided by registered mail at the addresses specified below or at any sba h other address as may be specified in writing by the parties hereto: City: City of Rancho Cucamonga Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 5 Attention: City Clerk Developer: Atter,M on: .�1 E Density Bonus Agreement Page 7 Section 18. Seyerabi l i ty. If any provision, clause, section, subsection, paragraph or sentence Of this Agreement shall be declared invalid or illegalby a court of competent jurisdiction, the validity and enf orceabil i t;, of the remaining portions of this Agreement shall nct in any way be effected or impaired. APPROVED AS TO FORM: L;ItY Attorney IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the Developer have executed this Agreement as of the dates set opposite their signatures. Dated: Dated STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) ss. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO CITY OF RANCHO CPCAMONGA By �J eft.-rey King, ayor City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPER By On this day of , 1986, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in an or said awe, personably appeared JEFFREY KING, known to me to be the Mayor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation;, and said person is known to me to be the person who executed the within instrument on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and acknowledged to me that the City of Rancho Cucamonga executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal, Notary PU0lic to and for say SYaTe U-( 11 EXHIBIT "A BEING A SUBDIVISION OF 7i L OF LOTS 1 AND 4, AND A PORTION OF LOTS 2 2 A14D 3 OF TRACT MAP NO. 5955, AS RECURDED IN >;.;OOK 74 OF MAPS, 3IPAGF RECORDS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA. 4 5 BEGINNING AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF RAMONA AVENUE AND 6 FERON BOULEVARD, THENCE ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF FERON BOULEVARD -7 SOUTH 8905-)'10 EAST 733.46 FEET-. THENCE LEAVING SAID CENTERLINE 8 SOUTH 00''09450" WEST 34.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT - 0 OF -WAY OF FERON BOULEVARD, SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF 10 BEGINNING; THENCE'LEAVING SAID RIGHT -OF -WAY SOUTH OG °14154" EAST 11 580.19 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY OF THE SANTA 12 FE RAILROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT -OF -WAX NORTH 89050'00" WEST 13 FEET TO A POINT vW TTiE EASTERLY RIGHT' -OF -WAY OF RAMONA 14 AVENUE; 1700.23 THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT -OF -WAY NORTH 0 014147" WEST 400.07 15 FEET TO A POINT ALSO BEING ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY OF AN 16 ALLEY, 20 FEET WIDE, THENCE LEAVING T.HE EASTERLY RIGHT,' -OF -WAY OF 17 RAMONA AVENUE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY OF SAID ALLEY" 18 SOUTH 83 05,0'02" EAST 98,96 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT -OF -WAY 10 NORTH Q °14'4.8" WsST 180,09 FEET TO A P0114T ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT - 20 OF -WAY OF FERON BOULEVARD;, THENC!' ALONG SAID RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE 21 NORTH 89 050'10" EAST 601.25 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT'OF BEGINNING. 22 SEE E_tHIBIT "D ". 2311 PARCEL CONTAINS 8.92 ACRES 25 'PREPARED BY MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 26 J.N. 417 -8445 27 JULY 30, 1986'��_,�✓ : 8 Rnlin w Exhibit "B" Section 50053, Affordable Rent. E "Affordable rent" means, ,with respect to lower income households, rent not in excess or the percentage of the gross incane of I the ocoapant person or family established by regulatt,, of the depart orin, and Oich shall not exceed 33 percent of i,,,_ I, a� gross .ne. Such 1 regui ations shall permit Al=ternative percentage Lf income 'for agency- assisted rental and cooperative housing developments pursuant to regulations adopted under, subdi vi.si on"'. (f) .of Section 50462. The department shall, by regi&ation, adopt criteria dcfining, and prow ding for determination -income lent a of, cmoss and' f�ir,purposR -4 of this section. Such regulatio:s may providA,_aitErnative criteria,. where t necessary to be consi sent with pdt —inept federal statutes and �. regulations governing federal �,, assisted rental and . fooperative housing. The agency may, by re- ation, adopt a[ternative +criteria, and pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section, 50462, alt•ev,native percentages of income may be adopted for agency - assisted housing developments. Exhibit "B" Jq d �I 3ectio,i 50093. Persons and .atri;,ies csf Icw or moderate Income- Division Definitions. +, i "Persons and families of low or moderate income" mean's persons and families whose income; does not exceed 120 per -,ent of area median income, adjksted for family si e by th- department in accordance, with adjustment factors adopted and amended?- -from time to time by the United States j Department ox Housing and Urban Development pursuant to Section 8 of I ;;h;: United States ' iousing Act of 1537. Such 'i income limits shall be published as regulations by the depart- ment. However, the agency and the dtapartm..nt jointly; or either acting with the concurrence of the Secretary of the Buziness and Transportation Agency, may permit the agency to use higher inc ^ne limi.tati.ons in designated geographic areas of the state, upon a determinat.pn that 120 percent of the median income in the particular geographic area is too low to qualify a. substantial number of - sersons and families of low or moderate incoute who can afford rental or home purchase of housing financel pursuant to Part 3 {commer;ling with Section 50900} without subsidy, "Persons and families of lots or moderate income" includes very low income households, as defined in section 50105 and lower income households as defined in �,ction 50079.5, and includes persons of low income,- crsons and families r,f moderate income, and middle- income families. As used in this division: (a) "Persons of low income" means persons or families who are eligible for financial. assistance specifically provided . by a governmental agency for the ;enefit of occupants of ;;sousing financed pursuant to this division. {h) "persons and families o"' rtoder4te income" or "middle - income families" meant persons and families of iow r`s moderate income whose income exceeds the income limit for ' lower income households. As used in this section, "area median income" means the median family income of a geographic area of the state, as annually estimated b the United States Department Of Housing and Urban Development pursuant to Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937. In the event such federal determine- Lions of area median income are discontinued, the department Sxhibit "C" U -f4 O IE Vll l Vl lY[11Y%J"%j V V kamlylvil Ua STAFF REPORT O C F � e U 1977 August 13, 1986 TO: Planning Commission FWA: Building Official SUBJECT: i@DIFICATION OF IMSIDENTIAL NOISE STANDARDS BAC`_'GROL'ND At the meeting of June 11,1986 the Planning Commission +,equested information relative to the improvement of sound attenuation in i :sidential *occupancies, particularly in regard to sound transmission between units. Currently, Building and Safety Division is enforcing regulations (•ontained in the Uniform Building Code and in the State Building Standards Code. State Building St:ndardr 'or noise reductions bet,Veen units parallel those in the UBC except for noises from external sources, wnich are not regulated by the UBC. Both applt equally to all dwelling units (apartments, hotel, motels, condominiums, townhouses, etc.) except detached, single family units. ANALYSIS Changes to current regulations would require three actions on the city's part. One, preparation and adoption of an ordinance to amend the building code and the State Building Standards Code; two, the making, by the City Council, of an express finding that amendment to the State Building Standards is nesessary because of certain local conditions; and, three, filing of the finding with the State Department of Housing and Comnunity Development. The first and lattar actions are relatively simple, the second may not be. Based upon Sections 1.7958.5 and 1.7S58.7 of the State Health and Safety Code, modifications to state residential building standards are limited to those that are attributable to local climatic, geological or topographic conditions. It seems unlikely that a finding could be made, that noise between dwelling units in Rancho Cucamonga is generally different from other parts of the state, (and thereby a local condition) aad, ITEM V furthers would be difficult to relate to climatic, topographic or geologic conditions. I have discussed this matter with the City Attorney who is of the opinion that a City Council determination of overriding, justifying re;.-sons for amendment, consistent with the limitations, would be extremely difficult, if not impossible to conclude. Wall and floor /ceiling construction assemblies are assigned a rating number as a result of testing under laboratory o, conditions. This number is referred to as a sound transmission class (STC) which is a reflection of the structure's ability to r: effect a reduction of sound energy from one room to another. Separation between dwelling units, by curre_Et codes, allows an assembly with an S1'C of 45 if in- place field testing is conductej, or allows ilstallation of generic, laboratory - tested assemblies having an 5TC of 50. Most builders choose to install the latter because of the expense of field testing. There are hundreds of 'different generic assemblies from nearly as many product manufacturers that have been tested and assigned STC ratings by recognized testing agencies. Most of the technical data 41 this report is derived from the "Fire Resistance Design Manual published by the Gypsum Association which is one widely accepted source of sound information. In regard to the technical aspects of construction, increasing sound attenuations between units is possible, however an additional reduction would certainly add some cost to construction. The cost of attenuation is somewhat proportional to the degree of sound reduction. The accompanying drawings indicate typical construction methodology utilized to achieve code compliance (50 STC min.) and additional alternative measures that would achieve greater-than-complying separations. Achieving the 50 STC rating can be accomplished by utlizing . conventional methods of staggered framing memebers (studs) and double - layering of surfacing materials to which meets code _equirements. Achieving a 55 STC rating nay be accomplished by the construction Of two completely independent walls with two layers of gypsum wallLoard on the dwelling- unit - exposed surfaces and a single 3 1/2" layer of insulation. The Fire Resistance Manual ineludes only one wall rated at 60 STC. That wall consists of single studding with metal resilient channels and two layers of 6 /8" gypsum board on one side. The other side has 3 layers of gypsum board, (1 -5/811, 1-1/21t and 1- 3/8 "). The wall cavity is filled with insulation. Screws and two different nails are specified for progressive attachement of the underlying layers of materials; face layers are applied with adhes ve.' Construction pf wails exceeding the 60 STC level would generally enerally require the use of concrete or masonry materials. a A 50 STC for floor ceiling separation is most usually achieved by the use of carpeting, pad and lightweight concrete over plywood subfloor, insulation of the joist s2aces and gypsum wallboard on the underside. �r An STC of 55 may be aehier-ed by utilization of carpet, pad and lightweight concrete over plywood subfloor, with resilient furring channels and gypsum wallboard on the underside. The Fire Resistance Manual likewise includes only a singe wood - ` frame floor /ceiling assembly with a STC of 60. The make-up of `.' the floor is as follows; carpet, p , pad, lightweight concrete, �jotsts, 3 1/2" glass f br- insulation, furring channels and �R gypsum wallboard;attache�,<ceiling. The approximate costs . of the various assemblies are as follows:.. I" Basic 50 -54' TC Wall $2.22 sq.ft. Upgraded 55 -59 STC wall 2.52 sq.ft. Upgraded 60 -64 STC wall 2.60 sq.ft. ` Basic 50 -54 STC FloorJCLG. 2.84 sq.ft. Upgraded 55 -59 STC FloorICLG. 3.11 sq.ft. Upgraded 60 -64 STC Floor /CLG. 3.31 sq.ft. SDiVli1 WRY Current state law mandatao anforeement of specific requirements in regard to residential sound separations. Changes to those regulations are limited to changes relevant to local geological, topographical or climatic conditions, and then only by adoption of an express finding of need by the legisiative:body. Costs for upgrrAinr within the range of conventional materials and methods would inerease housing prices 112 - 1 112 percent dependent upon the degree of improvement sought and the materials utilized Sign9ficant upgrading of current regulations (beyond 60 STC) is probably not achievable except by departure from conventional residential construction methods and materials. RECONZ E NDATION In consideration of the limitations placed upon residential code revision by state statute, it appears that modification of sound control standards between residential units is beyond the authority of the city and therefore, it is recommended that the Planning Commission take no action in this issue. V-3 wl4 L s 1370 Jf,471Ay 0:" ,P�sr�rE.vrcc%rtLUec avo.c, Si$� Cr Y.°SU.�! .ePOd.ES r Z•H SruDS !c aC. 'ft'¢YIStI.�/d�dRP � ''�4'CjYPSLLN 1LftRA +` . �LASt .� /��'R /�tSUG4Ttdv 2-Y S7•t(OS fa:'O.C. r"'.sp�ICS Yz` 4-44 JU f/G�CR l.J.FUldYlG4J r-'�'/a'" 4YRS!/N .9GLO.P� ., 2•Y 57 UOS 6"d.C. - 574��ERGO Rr! Z G Tc?� iyGfO7j'7:CG! PLAYES 1 �"yY1sGCCtOaARA. 1 E ,572f Z471 -Wry 60 G Sj CAROe7 t-vAO : • /'lt" 4¢�Vr WC/FNr cow /et'd7•G mss: rLYlYD00 t n� —W000 ✓oisrs /ago c:'.. • -.:. • sv :- [ASS F /8dt /.KSdGAtY2(/ RES /G /E.V7' CH,/,+lflE4S. Sy"pC Yy� �YRtu,(/ lv- +LtBQ.eQO S7C- Zfr�-vy ss -sg LE f /sf^' L/yrr x/�.r,Nr cewctsra lx�%s•' PGYtI'000 . WOOD ,/a /SY,S IG�QC .. RES/'L /d.VT6Yq�t/,�IgLS' c ^y Gc h� Y'';r� �! H/ALLBO.IRO +— Cq.FF6�'yA�XO /Yz� C /l�Nr !✓criYNY GbNCRCrPE w11f. _,- �, \'k°�n±1GLt�n1 r- %z" PLYJVOJo I I i 1 { 3 %z"gUSS FarER /.ur�/L,ar�/ • . woon ra /srs ic• oc � 4risay wALGaoat`p V -15 I795$. a HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE HEALTH AND' 5A -MV- a § L958.a Local,variancr,[; annual retort a (a) Except as provided in Section 1102,4 in adopting the ordinances Section 1795$, (b) Whenever the en bas determined bal the bu4{ ` or re gulations a city or county mar m A) t such changes or, pursuant to contained in the prottstottsppblished tithe $tote Building Stand tdt node anuT ttother regula uns ado;;ad pursuant to Sectidii': 1792? -as proceedings to abate the S iol`w j requi efs itious it determ, l Pursuant to the provisions of Section 17918.7, are .. reasonably necessary because of local climatic, gelyogical. or topographicaleonditions. exire demolitk published iq tlse State Buildint . For purposes of this subiZvill a city an un may make ' ` • modifications to the requirements, adopted pars aytto ma 1m reasonably necessacir ` ' `this Pare The owner sh. a, chooses to repair; the enforcer .i -1, the code and regulations an the basis if local conditSons. M contained in the provisions Of according to a ressonable and require vacation and' demolicit (b) On or before' October 1, 1982, and each October 1 thereafter, report the department shall transmit a the State Buildin ;Standards Gommirl on the i other appropriate actioi or pr ri modifications and changes made by cities and cn. •ides t° the building standards published in the State Building Standards regut,.Sons 1L 1 The repair work is mill Code and thn -other of the commission. The report shall irolude A Surrmlil by the department of the reasons cited as the necessity for the _ i2) The owner does not mat -, modifieatk; . and changes, The report equdred pursuant he this section shall apply to modi4uatians and cban„es made after January 1, 1990. • (3l. The owner selects an op determin by the deoartmen' (Amended by ;ta l9fsS, a 908, �' _ q; Stats.19 &'r, G 282, § p' § ) or administrative order. 1 ^ In deFCldin whether to rent, .; Cross, Reterme" a ene s all veePrefEre „e,ce ' q Waiver, Ste § SOSaT,. so, without avin is to tr�,T1 a v. shast give full!, § 17958.:. Local variances; findings; filing: rejection of modification ioand lus ung elemen; ; (c) Notwithstanding' ' ' , (a) Except as provided in Sectdor. 1792:yti, the ty, any modifications or changes pursuant to Section 179 8� � n akeca�n e res11 bi f ore sn residential buildingshall be pt the health and safety of the shall t °h modifications or changes are reasonably neeessary.because of local climatic, 010 'cal or fora hi cal Conditions. Such a firdtn s a 1 -- ----i— g of the erode enforcement over subsstandard: , the enforcemen oval able as a Pit is `ern A cagy o su^ t findings, together all the ecodification or change expressly marked and.ideutsited to tahich each such findin refers, shall be filed with the department U— ar demolition permit 'fine be No such modification or change shall became effective or operative tt. any purpose until the limiting and the mod cation or change Save been fled with the department notice max provided g co r of the nonce m a rr ! fb) The department may reject a mor dfication or change filed by thr overndng god =of a cdtr or count tf no Fm n4 was Submitted— en crcement agency. is boll (Amended by Stats.1954, c. 908, p. - ^, § 5,) zontamla� provision vmr evenui� and Taxation Co . § 17955. Repealed by Stats,l9$i. z 888, p. —, § y amort izaHoti poi or mcurree (e) The 117950-4. Val rdshipcases; deferral of order of abatement enforcement agenc far sendtnpior posting the nr The housing s appeals board may. in cases of extreme hardship to owner-occupants or tenants of dwelldn g gs, provide for deferral of the (Amended by Stats.1985, c, 1 effective date of orders of abatement Any de errai o the effectit*� date of an order of abatement under this section shall terminate upon any sale or transfer of the dwelling by the owner- Not” of Heil ; Dutr to eaforea sbeteAest LZ occupant but shall not terminate u n the sale or transfer of the dwellin if the dwellin ds Deco led by a tenant .other a the owner -Deco ant (Amended by Stats.198a, c• 1279, p. —,,� §•q,) � nrtr m eeforte atxostaent 1 West's Aan.Cal.Hedth & Safety governing agency action. Upon vq I CHAMR 3. ADAIMSTRATION AND ENFORCEDIENT § 17980. Buildings in violation; notice to abate: nuisance; Instituting actions or proceedings; substandard buildings; PART 2. M( repair or demolition; preferences; zlotice of violation`, costs (a) If any building is constructed, altered, eonverted, or maintained in violation of any provision of. or of any order or notice giving a, reasonable time to Chapter correct that violation issued by an enf .cement agenc pursuant to, this part, the building standards pub)isht an the State Building Standards Code, or other rules and regulations 74 Motollehome Recovery adonted pursuant to " 'this part, or if a nuisance exists in any building nr upon the lot on which it is situated he enforcemem ageney shall, after 30 days' notice to abate the nuisance, institute any appropriate Fittmaacq action or proceeding to Prevent, restrain. correct, or abate the violation or nuisance Lot or camp. hem out for rent a comPliance with this pan, sce § t Underline Indicates changes or additions by amendment ' Astedsks ` > • Indicate dah 30 r ` _ a u C7 U m Qq tu cc O via UU om mF Na wf 6E. E U as J S' 2 E S 20 -0 IRV a -2 NE OJ bii 0 Un, 1`10 40 1?� 2 � R r -ro E % -r -.0 12, 40 -0- fi J-1 0 .2 . ! .9 7r3 On4 o 0 Ag ;,.-0 -q- M Z n. a c j: a-=i Fz k�d -e -40 2:2 nLo E .2 5. aN "'c E 0 •' Cro 0. R.5 E vv= su- ME 0 '0= 7Z- U,!:. I In 0.- -a E. $ Coro -a E . - ocu X.5 zr- 2 �- a -S a �s 1! -Z ci -1 0 0 U, 7 ,42 z D 0 (D SOU O Q F a,- V— /12 � I H A.! r Hai 1�. -.SO gi I O :2 r- U A 4:11 43 R-1 0.- 5 °p IV. E Bz O*B: Et r O 0 z z C: d � I _ a Q E� c ? a a a w v LU CL 5 ¢ h E GU 8 N u^ T 0 3�� v py •°y r - Q U 0. r O C N p a o a �tu , w C 0 F 3 y Q G u E F =° ptp 6 2'9'9 y\ 9 9 9 t U - rJ.ao 'uue. uT'o,. w c 3..p'ae`a� ma�a• acL oNO C7 c ,a. c.a •p° •E c. H'v Z R' u v C.•y p. O �vuo ou9' •u u -a a w a,-- +u._ v9 ° c G c•°.�.o c <;+ � J e °�='° e.sc. •^. O cod , mo`•,° -- v ws 0.� °t ° a1 S �' fySS w =" u o .p 0 R. q �. u^3. C 4 a O fA G •E q _+ •a �J " M U G•Z. s i] E 2 9 h 3 E a ;ago o. ^ E. � w u °G°' e v a a'y � �j s °p, u o , = . L' a'i 0 - -o a enu N c o �U `0 3 E c=i s c c z fl I' y O u .- U °• a L. •- u •.• _ f.,, 9 n'^ c n m °u s 3 3 p9 E 2 n O •V E u> 9 s O u W Ca•- tai .G • L'. ° �C� i `u C. A a•= G v ez to a aA $ a'•rn ci mi'� "' $ E n0. su ` LN �'uisE �co no's mCpc._E oac » '`.E�m uaCE �a t ay. ..oj. °`ua4.E iia�::� �ioc?. �'.� R a_ 6 NZ �° o f �' ° S °?. o'�. -• C d mE V Z Vc_a° c a „`o EG�Ey- n °an�oa oa9e°•� °- w,E °= G t' p '�^ a 4 U 4 U Q W 9 I. Oa �nU ��u °u D2GpEeyca�a9coaa, C.ya.0 o.'avE'a= I E.. o ' -o _ eec ''�= C� _ Za- O�+^i' u f! -0 v °cl:. �g4; o� U` 3 m C a^ �y G VS os m Q •3 0..a C[. "s a. u V D p? c x .7. O cu•oa_m c� �"eEEc:.'.a` ' Nn urpa•u..voucEEa��. ate. .7 W V C a p° 7a Q C a O c C � 4 � 9 V C y� a O a f a. ti p= 7.;s u r V iJ w� nCy C i3 S' u .. E 1! °° u c° r E.3 E^.S u S"w 5 �aX o° mr C E E 12 P, y �uoAo -=-oQ co �. o°o`Ly o-cia CQ'(} °W aG 'y',j `a'aw a .°lEa o.M E o Ea u Etnu u a..,9[•„ E EMv;o,c sae °s, 9u y. h E u w a 1 CL a b. Ta ' > ° ul `u'o ^cc•o uuU °JUGu9 E�- °-3cE�uFc4�F•O q N ao•°+C~"'rsEa rwL°N n Y' E August 13, 1986 T0: FROM: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND CITY OF RANCRO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT PLANN:"G C0,11WISSIOri BUILDING OFFICIAL RESIDENTIAL FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS The Planning Commission has several tires requested a report rtdarding the value of developing regulations for installation of fire sprinkler systems in residential buildings. This report is intend %rd to respond to those requests. ANALYSIS Mandatory fire sprinkler installation on any broad -based approach is quite rare in the United States. Those jurisd4etions hat have applies' it unilaterally to single- family developments are even scarcer. r=.. the data gathered there is only one jurisdiction in the United States that has applied sprinkler requirements to 2s-igle family residentia< -uses for any length of time; that ordinance was adopted by the City of San Clemente, California in 1979, before the advent of current residential sprinkler standards. The cities zi Arroyo Grande, California and_Scottsdaie, Arizona implementeC ordinances late in 1995 and early this year, respectively. 3cottsdale's ordinance only applies to newly developing areas of the-City. Arroyo Grande's ordinance was placed on moratorium before it became effective and the moratorium currentlq remains in eff ct witft revision anticipated in the near future. The City of Fontana recently introduced an ordinance to require sprinklers in all new buildings except private garages, sheds, etc., under 200 sq. ft. in area, which at time of writing of this report was pending segond reading. Their ordinance I., not .;Tear as to retrofitting existing structures. In addition to the cities w 'e. there are a number cf jurisdictions that apply sprinkler requirements in new multiple dwellings and qui`,ce a few that require sprinklers under certain conditions, such as poor access, rugged terrain, inadenuate water supply or remoteness. (The Foothill Fire District has required installation of sprinklers on a case by case basis where access is difficult.) MM W I I In most cases, the adoption of a broad residential sprinkler ordi,;ances has been accompbilied by modification of infrastructure requirements sit,,-h as reduction in water main size, inczeased cul- de-sae lengths, narrower streets, etc., to offset additional costs of construction.: Most of the promoi;lonal information in circulation also indicates potentjal ins=urance savings to homeowners, however, we have not bean able to verif!r that such would apply in Rancho Cucamonga. In fact we have been advised that some insurance companies add a penalty for potential wat-ar drinage it sprinklers are installed. Most of thU data available regarding residential fire sprinkler systems stems from tests conductfd since 1978. Initial tests indicated that cormiarciallindustrial systerns were slow in operation and`•did not provide the wetting patterns needed for residential installation. Subsequently, new spray heads were developed and tested and in late 1980 a new standard for fire sprinklers was adopted by_the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). Thni standard is known as 11NFPA Standard 13D, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems in One- arid-Two Family Dwellings and Mobile Homes". to The Standard states clearly that its purpose was Liitended provide a method for those individuals wishing to install a sprinkler system for additional life safety and property protection. It is n2f the p�u_rpose of tnis standard to 12 _qEire the installation of —an automatic sprinkler system" (emphasis added). This statement is at least a itrong inference that the standard was not intended to becomt. a mrndatory measure as is currently advocated bj many of the proponents of residential fire sprinklers. However in the past several years there has been considerable effort expend4d by certain organizations, members of the fire service, manufactvrers and installatiori•eompqr'�os ':0 mandate widespread instaV.ation. Their Gyfart-,,, have t Jn based upon the nearly unchal4engeable Position that fire sprinklers - save lives and property and reduce fire protection needs, thereby retarding the escalating costs of maintaining fire protection services. On the other side of the argument, the California Building Industry Association has developed a report, (currently beinq updated), based an California statistical resaarch data, that seems to indicate that, by itself, installation of sprinklers in residential uses is !,lot the most cost-effective way of achieving reductions in lire loss. Anotier publication from the National Bureau :f Standardi indicates residential sprinklers can be cost- effective, given t me concessions from insurance lnt�_rl�_sts an government. _d FIRM �J_Z Most of those 00=L nities adopting residential sprinkler ordinances have made substantial "trade- off's,' in exchange for the sprinkler installation. In order for such to be accomplished in Rancho Cucamonga, support and cooperation would be necessary from the Foothill District. Their representative has indi "eated: to this office that, in their view, sufficient historical data has not yet been accumulated or verified to warrant zi,aiticani departure from the standards currently fol3owed. An interesting side issue that has surfaced since our information gathering began, is that the majority of buyers of new homes are skeptical or untrusting about having sprinkler heads ii: their homes. In one Rancho Cucamonga project, wherft certain units were required to be sprinklered and the sprinklered units subsequently offered to prospective buyers without additional cost, approximately 60 percent of the prospects indicated an aversion to the sprinklers and preferred unsprinklered units. Similar suspicions were experienced in Arroyo Grande with adopt:zm of their ordinance. Costs for installation of sprinklers run about $1.00: +, $1.50 per square foot. Assuming a cost of $1.25 per foot, normal do v.—_ payment of 20%, 10% lending rate and a 30 year loan, a sprinkler system for a 1506 sq. ft. house would increase the monthly payment by about $13.17 per mon-h. Total costs over the life of the purchase contract wouxxa be about $5,100 (exclusive of maintenance, repair costs or water damage penalties). This amo -?nts to about $170 per year. Anticipated maximum reduction in fire insurance costs would be approximately $40 per year, or less than 25'% of the cost. Costs to the community for providing fire protection could conceivably be affected by sprinkler installations on a broad Seale, however, demands for fire suppression p- • *sonneI and equipment are generated to a larger degree by commercial /industrial construction and by the potential for wind driven fir.; storm, than by residential fires. So, &,.though the overall ujimber of responses to residential fires may reduce to some degree, substantial reduction in manpower seems unlikely, simply by adoption o:, a residential sprinkler ordinanee. There is little historical data to substantiate reduction of life -loss in residential fires by sprinkler installation, simply because, until very recently, sprinklered homes have been virtually non- exixtent (approximately 2000 houses in the entire U.S.) and therefore not capable of comparison. Statistics quoted regarding life loss in sprinklered buildings are based largely upon non- residential buildings. The most outstanding life ILSI in all s,ruetures results from smoke inhalation. Residential sprinkler systems do not activate from smoke alone; bat is required. Additionally residential systems complying With N,F.P.A. Standard 13D unlike commer iai systems do not include coverage in small areas nor in W concealed spaces of the structure, thereby increasing the potential for smoke development in those spaces, with migration to occupied areas. Initiating a residential fire sprinkler ordinance would necessitate inspection, both at the time of insiellatieva and on a recurring basis thereafter, if systems are to remain in working order. There would also to considerable additional plan check time required in the checking 'oroeess. This would require added personnel and equipment, either by the city or the FootU li Fire District dependent upon the enforcement agency.. Sprinkler plan checks are currently.perfermed through the city by an outside consultant, Ins *section of corm- ;rciallindustrial sprinklers i�:: provided by the Foothill Fire District, 5U11SMY Because of the inadequacy and short history of available facts and statistics regarding the subject, and the difficulty of addressing the virtually sacred lifa- safe`wl* issue, the advantages of requiring residential sprinklers is as yet, impossible of objective analization. A few tentative conclusions ran, however, be reached: a. Constr Ition Oosts would !acres . Cost - effectiveness over the life if the systems would depend heavily upon eoneessessions by gave nment in development standards and/or the :nsizraace industry. b. P operty loss from fire drnis1, would probably reduce. Whether this savings would 'aa offset by water damage penalties remains 1uestiorable, and world probably vary by insura»az company chosen. c. Escalation of fire prote -, "on costs may be slowed, but probably not in pronortion -'o the added costs to consumer. d. There would likely bo some aversion to acceptance by bu�jrs. e. There would be costs associated with of administration of a program, for plan check- initial installation inspections and maintenance rechecks. f. Life savings by sprinkler installations is, as yet, debatable since there is inslifficit:nt history to su'astantiate claims made. We have gathered mounds of information, much of it duplicative and speculative The majority if it has been prepared by companies or agencies with vested interests i.i promoting residential sprinklers. We have attached several articies that seem pertinent. The ",�41ance of the information .s available in the Building and Safety— is :'is.ion for Coriiniss.ion revigw if desired, n 1 PECOVIlmNDATjo-,tT All things consi-dered,the limited factual data available: indicates that insta,lla,tion of ;.rr sgrinr3� ?ers in residential buildings is probably not cost, effective .except .by subs tagtial _ relaxation in .developmeait standards. Further`' eny increase of life safety that rnigttbt:b.P achieved %g their installation is indeterminate due to a lack of his data. Ir is recommended that no action be take$1 at tbi -s time; rather that this matter be deferred until suffAcient `historicai t!ecords have accumulated to make a more definitive Poftelusion passible, 1 i r-1 L-A