The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1986/09/24 - Agenda Packet cu' ram, s s t,zk rt, s �Aa.,= x "r f '�F. .�-t �;fir,} �� ^�,. ��'. 09 G t g CrIfY of RANCHO CLG1\•IU\GA oW• •il�. 1977 > WEDNFSDAY SEPTEMBER 24,1986 7;00 p.m. t LIONS PARK COMMUNPTY CENTER F( 91,61 BASE FINE It .; RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA �k 4 L Pledge of Allegiance lI_ Roll:cau Commissioner Barker Commissioner Tolstoy� Commissioner Chitiea� Commissioner Stout Commissioner McNiei: 19L Announcements W. Presentation of Cosamet* doa►Resolution to Herman RemrVI i Y. Approval of Minutes July 23,1986 VL Consent calendar l The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine II i and non-controversial. They will be acted on by Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over:,any item, it should be removed for discussion t A. DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRAG,'9649-TAG MANAGEMENT= l Design Review of building elevations and plot plans' or a previously approved tract map comprised of 39 lots on 24 acres in the Very Low Density Residential District:(less that 2 dwelling units per acre),located at the southwest corner of r Wilson Avenue and Hermosa Avenue-APN 201-17u-13. s } \l D 12237-2-N ORDIC g� DESIGi3 REVIZVI FOR.`PRf�. i` o d Plot p1aY►s or 10 -Design Review o build"uig ion bt 12237-2)in the V cry located on the east side of lots�rithin two esiden al Distrriiettt APN 201-452-01, Low`Iaensity R north of HoIde jt"d - Hermosa Avenue, 201-g1d, 05 through 10. 02;24,25,26,;201-463-08,1 ; u osed IAWIS TE at t gRA VISTA CUL-DE-SA B =r=�` 3 dlnreupl de- C, es to ence,treatmdnts he end chant o y.; saeli�. VIT. public Hearings in which concerned The wing, items are Ilklic hearings elated p ro]ect. Phase voice their opinion of the r indivtduats may thQ C hairman and address the Commission wait to be recognized,by All such opinions shall be by stating yow' name arcdtyidual foreaohp�fect. timtted to 5 minutes per ind' ` , ' D, :jNViRJxiMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MA_P 93= A located on HENSLEY-A slibdEvision o 13.77 or,(Subarea Sub� parcels lain t--he G'�neral Tnduetrie'.!Designatia., the northrest corner a &th Street Rd Buffalo Avenue-APN 228-262-28. CONDITIONAL USE o- L• ENVIRONMENTAL A9'E55141E1TT AND ��D _The request ?EBMITAMENDMEZIr DIVEdopMent of graved site plan for Phase III located at the .o amap~ center (Haven Village) located Avenue an approved shopping northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Hig APN 201-271-53. COACT - The g, FISVIRY O� A '$g gNGEAfCROWN NDPTIONAT� IISE PEB 15 business w;thin o a motor home/bus assembly and the s establishment square foot industrial buildinailding on 11.8 an existing 168,000 s9 83,0o0 square Moot expansion of the existing Served District and in the General Industrial/hail (Subarea 2), located at the southeast corner cf Arrow acres of l Highway and Vineyard Avenue-i PN 208-12-15. AND TENTATIVE TRACT G. ENVIRONMENTAL aS P"; 68 smg�amily 13342 - PANI3ON The develalsrme detached homes on 11.46 aereS of land in the heLow-Mediumorthes Residential District (4-8 du/aa), IoeatQd at the northeast ,T and Strequested a Tree Removal corner of IFermasa Aven licant has req et-AP 202-191-13a 23. In addition, the app Pt trees. Y Permit to remove 1.7 EucalyP i *" H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AWAMOMENT 86-01 - ' LEIVIS/ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT-A request to,9 -'?nd the land use map of Terra Viszll ram proposed Juno-' ah School site to Low Medium Residential (4-8 du/ac_,. .r''20 acres of land located on the west;gide of Rochester.,north of Church Street and various related.'amendments to the density provisions of the Community Plan. ; NVlR0jgMENTAL ASSESSMENT Ai TERRA VISTA PARK DEVELOPMENT" GREE1VIEl3T ?1O. 1 FIRST SUPFIaEMEjTAL AGREEmEN'I A SWplernentai agfeement regarding the approximately 20 acre site located on the west side of Rochester,south of Base Line Road. I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN _ AMENBl4IENT 8H-43A-LAP+TG HOMES-A request to amend She Land Use Element or the General Plan from Flood Control to Low Medium Density Residential(4-8 du/ae)for 40 acres of land located at the southwest corner of the extensions of Banyan and Milliken-APN 201-27I-55. _ J. ENVIRONi. 4TAL ASSESSMENT AND GE14ERAL PLAN AMENDMEb,f 86-03B-CL.7^MAN-A request to amend tale Land Use Elemr=7 tale GGeneral Plan from Medium Density Residential (4-14 du/ae) to Neighborh?od Commercial for 10.7 acres of land,located at the northwest corner of Haven and HiC avnd-APK 201-262-28,30,31,36,31k,40,41,43. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 86--03- CLUBMAN -A request to amend the Development District ra'iif from "Mff(8-14 dulac) to '°NC" for 10.7 acres of land, kicated at the northviest ♦ corner of Haven and Highland APN 201-262-28, 30,31, 36, 37,40,41,43. K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86-03C-CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- A request to amend the Land Use Element cif the General Plan from Medium High Residential (14-24 dulac) to Office for .75 acres of land ocated on the south side of Foothill Boulevard 1125 feet west oZ Hellman Avenue(9113 Foothill Uoulevard)-APN 208-241-09. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 86-04 - . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Development ( District Map from "NIH" (14--24 dulac) to "OP" Office/Professional) for .76 acres of laud located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, 1125 feet west of H&lman ,'ivekt a(9113 Foothill Boulevard)-APN 208 241-09, s t `r L. 'ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL P.;AN AMENDMENT 86-03D - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA-- A request to amend the Land Use Fdement of the Qeheral Plar from Low Medium Density Residenrtial (4-8 du/4e) to Lots Density Residential (2-4 du Jac) for 68 acres of land ' located at the southwest corner Of Wiison (if extended)and Milliken(if extended)-APN 201-191-11,17. ENVIRONMENTAL_-_ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMR39DMENT 86-0.5 - CITY OF "RANCHO CUCAMONGA = A request to amend the Develop, ent District Map from tTC" (Flood Control;, and "LM" :t,,ow Medium Density Residential-4-8 du/ac)to"L"(Low Density Residential 2-4 du/ac) for 68 acres of land located at the south Wrest corner of WH son (if extended) and Milliken (if extendod)-APN 201-191-11,17. M. ENVIR0:7MENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86-03E-CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- A request to amend the Land Use Element of the General_ 1, Plan from Office/Professioi*to Medium Density Residential (4-14 du/ae) for 3.56 aer!�'of land located at the southeast corner of Church and Arehi,�,0.ld-APN 1077-332-26. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSET tmEn AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT` 86-06 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A request to amend the Development District Map from 11OP11 to I'M,'(8-14 du/ac)for 3.56 acres of land located at the southeast corner of Church and Archibald -APN 1077-332-26. N. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - 86-03 TEXT_- CITY OF RANCHO s CUCAMON,..i A request b3 amend the text of the General Plan,the defiaution of Medium Density Residential from 4-14 dwelling units per acre to 8-14 dwelling units per acre. O. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86-03F C1Ti Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the 'wand Use Element c the General Plan from Medium Densi�y Residential (4-14 du/ae) to Low Medium. Density Residential (4-8 du/ac) for 3.67 acres of land, located at the na.Awest corner of 19th Street and Arebibaid Avenue,portion of APN 202-101-21. k vial. New Busnees P. OPMENT REVIEW 86-09 BIXBY-The review of the proposed Allister Plan Design G�,tidelines for complianc4; .of conditions of approval for a`35-acre master sxte plan,located be hNeen Milliken Avenue and Pittsburgh Avenue,and betv4 een 4tn`Street and 6th Street-APN 229"261-58,59. t Up w�^ ' Q. VACATIO14 OF 22ND 1r%R,EET X. Commiss or4 Buslness -XL Publie Comments i This is the time and place for the general public to address tha f . Commission.-. Items to be discussed Here are those which do not ` alroadv appf.'dr on this agenda. ML Adjournment - The Planning Commission has rlopted Administrative Regujatt!ons that set an 11 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, theyshall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. l k VICINITY MAP t� LJ SPHERE OF INFLUENCE 1 HIL LSIDJ t WIL SON \\ 13AN VAN ♦ a u --� _ _ (_ O tTHIL Ff9 E41IAY ��fA 'HIGH 6 NOT ♦ J S / a a W i AS LINE • yip a �o 1 / a ARR WUS - , / t 3 ® � a r.r > 4� _� . 7th W ...,� q Y p W m w ` 4th t�7 m lop � Z ? la - - m > U � J $ tr F+ W SAN B RNARDIN FREEW Y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON i - - i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ? a kk 3 o p P. (Z � U 4+ � LW7 t DATE: Septemher 24, 1986 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission i FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Assistant Planner �. SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 9649 - TAG MANAGEMENT - Design eview of oui I ding el evations fi , op ans for a previously approved tract map comprised of 39 lots on 24 acres in the Very Low Density Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest E corner of Hermosa Avenue ano Wilson Avenue - APN 201- i 173-13. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Design Review and approval of building e eva ions an pot plans. B. Project Density: Less than 2 dwelling units per acre. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North Single family residential; Very Low Density - Residential (less than 2 du/ac) South Singlu family residential; Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 du/ac) East - Hermosa Elementary School; Low Density Residentiali (2-4 du/ac) West - Single family residential; Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 du/ac) D. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 du/ac) North - Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 du/ac) South - Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 du/ac) ' East - Elementary School West - Very Low Density Residential (less than '� du/ac) } ITEM A PLANNaTNG tOt NT'SST=lOH STAFF"iEPORT September,24,, 1986 _ OR for Tract 9469 Page 2 4 r a E. Site Characteristics-. The site is currently vacant with a 5 - slope nor o sou h. There are four Eucalyptus windrams oil,,, the site - two double rows that border the property along Hermosa and Wilson Avenues, one single row that bisects the #N site in a north-south direction, and one single row that Ie bisects the property in an east-Nest direction, II, ANALYSIS' A. General: This tract was .ori b + ginall approved roved PP y the Planning oC'rtmissi n on May 5, 1982, as a custom lot subdivision. ;The applicant is proposing this project as Phase III of "Knoll Park Acres" (Phases I and II are currently under construction on the �.` north side of Wilson Avenue, west of Hermosa Avenue). The floor plans and elevations will be the same as used in Phases I and 3I. The unit mix will zonsist of 2 two-story floor plans (2700 anal 2800 square feet 'in area) and 1 one-story unit (2400 square tee; in area). Each floor plan will have three different building elevations. B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee reviewed e project on September 4, 1986, and recommended approval subject to the following conditions 1. Greater variation of front yard setbacks be provided to improve visual quality of the streetscene. 2. On elevations where wpod is not a prominent - feature, architectural detailing around windows shall be provided through the use of stucco plant-ons. 3. The Committee also recommended that the applicant look into the possibility of converting the third garage space into a "bonus room" or workshop area as a buyer option. The garage door and the drive approach leading to the third garage space would be eliminated. (The applicant indicated that all lots have been pre-sold). 1"T PLANNl%COM1418S ON STAFF REPORT September 24, 1986 OR for Tract 9469 Page 3 j II4. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Piasning Commission F approve e e evations and plot plans through the adoption of the 4 attached Resolution with Conditions. RABULLE 4sui B. City planner BB:SM:dak Attachments Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization,Map Exhibit "B" - Tract Map Exhibit "C" - Site and Grading Plan Exhibit "O" - Building Elevations . ` Original Resolution of Approval with Conditions Resolution of .Approval for.Design Review of Tract 9649 i z' � s ll r dq g t m < Lu F:'�� 7c�ia i le COD fa 11 Y i E 4 ��lii, tl r{ tg Y En@ I4oil r C ZU a /l= O �Q s O i � •� o 0 0 oIo $o O o , yY� a urtmi o.oLw.mna PLAMING D VLgQN— ..,C�" Exf-EEBETn 1LE= f :. Y TRACT NO. 96 4 9 tit 7AE CITY OF PAHM CUCAHDNCA yttw A uzntrtztw arc rallea,x b6 raptxt Isar w.our• Af EtAlviRP if ft>oY sl�raR4Et fWs.ratty 4(abp 4S.RECfRRSIX THE CWfT4 bF Sap p(RfMlp[ab.STAfiL bi tail;W1A 1 3 � UIL5DN �AYEHUE """"' ( 4 1 ( � f ► ? tom. a sx•« t `2 24 t; ;1 2tf / 19 t. 27 :aIs24 jig 4i(I t 1 uwu t] J , 'H �. Vt7-L ram$ 1 1117 M J2 33 's 34 ' 33 S ]a 1 `• z if 3T 3► ]R ��1: Tit 944 :,E314J��s?$31 ,..,.jL�L��_.1�� sr,•y �� y NORTH CITY OrRANCUO CUCAMONGA ��: - �- PLANNIi`G DIVISFCt !'T EaH(Bti:,,$ 5G1LEt ' r � ' NN 1 Tfy t:�t11111e1a1t t•' °si tt '_ + •,lira s-+ +�. -- , a G,Y� { i_ vnN rnu swn vin. ?i F g�__ a� .?• � d7 i � 1 f ° fp'��lerdLZ vei.4l.L7S.Rsror _ �' lam' -- ��.i rr.l...t (! ® ..•.� •. .a +x n. .moo Lo -rc—D-1. ••s�`O C ,y- � S •� ti `_" '�L -sue- F _.t'�+ �' . IF OK.- CrY �✓;, .cs�ssJ'e`' }'• V '^ CITY Or. rrF-%1. RANCHO CUCA-MO CA TrrtE:�; PLANNII G DIVOaN - EYxtt3rr: a 1 N ]] Iz _ y. ±,.n rlE i vU _ Idil:r8::';it EIR �^fs i A '/ 1 N t ,/r xu i / o 11 I. 2 1 CITY OF UL - RAl\CID CUCA.'ONGA TtTt_.E: �-LEUr4'"1anCs PLANNING DN-L(Y�14 -9 6KHtt3[T��SGiLE= AMA ioed e� s I ofl o x, 18 of f } (' 13 r zs Ft w� �c !-- EB i O � tit O J r � L y CITY OFis - RANCM CUCA lMO..-:GA Tom;__ „ PLANINING DCVLSKai--.F _ EXHIBIT: 'UD SG1i.E= - _ 0 r u I u f �~ I r �jq F3o • Cy - I ' '`` CkT \ .. 0 ° Z ,+ 0 u � 1 u. z 1in t r CITY Or, ECHO C;LC.AliVzOI` A TrrtE: PLANNING DiVOOM jQ-Cj ExH,,UIT.---.tom T SC, i; u Ell Srir 07ad �� i .._. t, 1 � �i�� •at • t i� .��`. q e 1 Li 'a�ee 8 il�. �[[[{ fp ii i • M ` J. }J Jz cn Y or, l PLANNING�DIVISK'•'d c%I•iIMT: SCALE:________. a� I Eli � � J s�1�►� rT �I C]o r 'Sh hi Q F ' b ! Li } 3�g r `` fIrr i 'ES CITY OF rreN 1: PLAMINGYDRTTSOq d o r MIT �k I IF Ll �iiii s , d. CCI Z € ( is �s ! t u 11. All �I�i if �;"j � � � •�,�. � '� 1. ti �9a itj I, i w i i j CITY OF I.- RANCHO CUCA1MO'NGA TITLE PLANNING DR S:oN F� I3I r:}CHi ---�_ SCALE: ot 11: - El21 , .J9 1 OS CIS oiU, . m lu ois a •{/.f ��. .yam.11�1�1'' �3�it •�,g' �• ��Y(. sF 41 ' { 'jib ; `i / •gym e. L.. �{.a J u •1 CITY Or, rreM — - " 2 9� RA NCHO C CAUMONGA TrrLE: i. 'ov PLANNING BTVIS IN A',;�3 EXHIBrri ^rtLE: s i dil`1 t�pt AdIkk 3 �1 .9 >.< 11 �1 OF 1 i 4 2 u� gg � ��t i o Q} ?t Ir t n �I 1 °� El J ii n s ° I • II�r I` f` CITE' OI. rrE.\I: _ rna- nr- tZAtA? IIANGIO CUCAI U'I GA ' TrrtE: PLAL`tNING DIVISK)NL- 04)-�� EXHIBIT:_a Sc1LE: 9 _ Rl 1 � •1 J Y, Lam! $S In as I i .'LL i WE i� IL 1 X 2 r w }pY S d i u 3 E Ii CITY OF T 14-0 Q C.,TCAMON ITG�i�— Tt= �Y �'114�9 GA I.rrr..E: d��`irq-iloJ�S' PLANNING DrvLqQIf _�.:5' EXHII3rr - ---_sc�tit_E= Y t ( RESOLUTION NO.82-46 xr A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION of THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL.IFORNIA, C-;,aITIOiYA LY a�. APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT RAP NO. 9649 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 96499 hereinafter "Map" submitted by Landco,"Development, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the -eal property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California,- described as aousto,n lot residential ' subdivision of 22.4 acres into 39 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on,May 12, 1982; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the'Map subject to all conditions set forth in .the Engineering and Planning r " Divisions reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read- nd considered the Engineering and Planping Divisions reports and has consirered other evidence presented at the public hearing. _.. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning, "ommissicn of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION, 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 9649 and the Map thereof ..�4 (a) "the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable K interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans;' (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of de- velopment proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial envir,.onmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tact is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at '►arge, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. x Resolution No. 82-46 Page 2 (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts s' on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 9649. a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Star:dard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION I. The CC&R's shall require that all walls or fences in the rear yard of lots 1-9, and the side street yard of lots 22, 23, and 39, if built, shall be constructed of compatible materials and des ;gn and shall require approval by Design R-Pview 0�mmi thee. 2. The final grading plan shall ci;,arly indicate the distance between existing Eucaiyp'us tree trunks, to r be preserved, and slope cuts for grading purposes, particularly for lots 1-7 and,39. 3. This approval shall become null and void if the tentative subdivision map is not approved and re- corded within twenty-four (24) mouths from the approval of this project unless an extension has been granted by the Planning Commission. ENGINEERING DIVISION 4. Developer shall be required to join the Alta Loma Channel Assessment District for installation of the Channel. 5. Developer shall be required to contribute his share of the Engineering Expenses for the Alta Loma Channel Assessment Distrrict prior to recordation. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF MAY, 1982. PLANNING COPMIISSION OF THE CI OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ll Jecrgy ing, hairma A TEST Secretary o the Planet ng Commissian -19 9 3T1P1�' s4 s'- •, '"fir' ,., ''�i'4V, � .., c .y; .,n,.., .... Resp a io an e l{ /� I, JACK L04, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced. Passed; and adopted by the Plamning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of May, 1982, by the following gate-to wit: TV AYES; COMMISSIONERS: Rem el Sc P , eranka, Tolstoy, King. I NOES CON41SSIONERS: Noner S. ABSENT: COMMISa1vNk° None t;A a l j cn ct to v 8-2 • A r w F r n ' w y D< •wj''O 1^ D q4 0 o a'•D o v -�^.e ?o ^�� _i'r`c` y 3� N O o �• � <C 4 T N C C O � ...O L.. 4 G w` �C ^y n y y O y �^„n L N U.L OYL aY C^ a•C O n v r VO 4 D wi .� � 9 L is �•l C 9� .0 S. h _p v Oul E �•O, •.. w q=yq ...p �Dy6 u ...0 `zU. O�Giic » _q _�4 A ..<.0 Y C Q .+M Onin � .nCd LW 4.,YG •. A �u 7 L 4o. C `o. >Y L°•..�v4� o.s' I<�•. E w�., L C L v ^^� co we Da w a� ycCCt n Lyv o>o L o� aa� ank ce �v �� i e� a �.� c'•i+r o' .i �'i' avcro.., c na o4u�`n r L •^ < a0 w� O ,C,_ G< �� D' C SL N C•( w '• '.pI.GO < '� yy„O. Y_u �` - C= N� LE AE a YY u ,..= V O i V >•O •D � ..D. N E 7� Y � `v V^ � • ^O V 4 4y .r.• >� 'OS i CC <G y �. 9�Nn 4rp._03 G� 4 _C � �m L, V� Otr D. �4 �N <�` w Y�� O"•n V ` =f w y� ^N uY4C u Y w y4 V ywu n• ...� Lr<j < W•.�LS HX WYa.. ..d�LgaL IL-u H2N •9 � . ` 1••Lu�. L 4 C y^ � r G �O,. D • � L^... O i Cry ;h C L9 y= 3v x+D LO N. L. .� W n.� L` 4 C N 9 as .Y h L C E G•j y L C L�. = An pN Y� L LJ «� a u.CD nn �6 LLw j HQ -+ u Y<,� oY .bw mvn �a o�' .cc cu n✓.V`o Y e= O .i.G N C �.u "�' d�O b.� `a 9 <9•ai " �� .D..w.._, .�.. W <42 'vOC • u DNc< ..Vi'.J. o U C " oO =3.s @C _UV u y N u y 52 �. � E> w � ,cA ^y i^ au ^�a ao oY$ mu a>, •'�' ._ u$ ot5 N kg .G.+ 'b aua Eev ^.._ ftS 'v a o� 4C €'o`n'.a v mwY D c O "" >`c ' �n -u wD'.v oa uo•= .o�ti a� rq cW•a"i c c{`�� nG Nw:6 OC` DQ iD 02 o•pu y^Y YD CI4 ..�,6 V L O4.j �•'� Y C N 9> n r 4 O U O. 4 O L 9v _ G 4 G•+= N u c y� ov., oNo au r n on Dcq N L .�4 �L N w 1.�c? _w 4.•. Z= c. � _O o. G•+•+ HK IL->.n « i�q aai...ii LL q�4 V>�n .~n ,O az O y � • N 1p N ^ Ql 4 c Ij` b fa ry M 1 RE Ij w V � 94r y� 7q v. C O V w •N.Li tl L Tyr..`�b ^V G ... C b L y y r'.V • r n YRE W L> L E}� }d C L C.4 G R N N •.' ry, O c ` �.g y� fS tt+� Y,O.. S. �• A G... � L AC • a,y¢ _ MN b00 d4 � N aA u G v i' Dr N � ��G C� 4 k R•^ b> � 10 tw C p w t 4 79 O A i CLYwO. O u L i 4 G • L p �i u 4WCi b V V N 4et b y Ofi OG OC d n. 04� YT. O YG 6� 1 L C LM � b oa eGd Nva N>� �4 zd ¢F � `�A •-yu � v� �n� `N ]G ^A'EY G E00 � a u pr V ?�u u •�u�" L Y1 iL et ££G,9 O 4 a L •+EE Ol G �i�y�b 1-•2� GH N�� 6w� �w� 46 L Y� r� � N^I..e bwd 9J.P MC O ^'. O�b� C d.. CTLm IL-.q _� OfY. Ow GO ffi•F.`+ - .b.y �^FO�^L O. •v. A 4.L A � •- ^01 •-� C ^ y CV s� in o:a a cc=i is ' '�f>a�:.o' � �i•ii a i $ b� G S` mCti y •••Y yRF6 dv0 ^L - -f+-r CO.-� r,• 4 4Y L �o >•.yd-. .>�' � V � G. .^..fJ. Qr- Y ��3C•L` c�;i y.0 gO A LUNl.�4``L^ Vii C� N M6 LVp wi��j.Lii LLU �,C •C nCx OG`� ..ii �'v '.. °j 'p ofa 6 G u•' o a o cu c ao �ii^o�� c„^u os .�€ew n.•^« u.u.Y, $ E aLi � wd uVb fi N� dY75�f..y A R O G .YL dd i^n�0 v. C bd wd.��"•=.b.nG CwVLf G4 . bG u A = .O.i° =,^ : "�^-a1G, G'Mu'„' •=.a dbosubi$:-' usf �� c-`� a .aVi 4 " �Gcaccsbiy" 'uc�� 3m�a Y 2 Yb A aL v4 CU • .n vRGW �6�. 'O M y. Gqp ^ wL Lf>O tiLu.n OQ aN .;. _ E . !I b3 70.7Ldd - O nna GbcG �_r qc h A S a Ateu' ^sj b '^ yv_L �>a.. � r9 •- 6 L"4` u= -c< .o a� er-. '>^ i. as.` ;g „ .'G+t: ^s• nu eL. Ap „a.� A� G 'g.+ •N. G1�} ru b2 CCyR MrO2 b=y Odb Gd �i tOc Ev.s ^ M u_tL tip^T tl. b >µ� GaC b . =en b L lLf . W O 1. 24 u2Z V� N V b L L y` � O .�� .-y. LOt....Oi O. NA4n <nN CV <�Gw�h�C+t <.00G uc J F �r0 y 01 � §SL Y r Y ��c •.V O� �- =l L Q �o .G..-9. `•n r g t? w ' .'. t ab.OC ^Yr fy •'� b :.,o.'rJ 7 a- vy 4n... 4w. P ^ �✓� Lb+9 � 4d ? _,(.Ir�_/Q�l, ff u r L Yb Gjj •.r Cu'`'O� �� 0H S' �p fi.ebu yaa Y.0 in In. ^. q 2 �C I C LL4 V6�O rf m0^� N9yr v C qC L ^� G u L Ny sbym� as � � .b. c -� a:.+� c`o'y 4.o ..o �'++oy - c•c c `> a ��s C C� �O • Y 9L l�Ag -gp � `G 'L� C � Y t:l� � � O G O♦.I C Y`.•'I .n r 4 O� u Y b y O 6 0 ` O O O L� a `w O +9 M C'M fF.L,qi, w� r�G C O U G•'�' O i b. •^ � .�V rO. rL 6w' MOd ��O'� r'9Y O 9 bU a � qY 3 N 4jy bL Lqu +CG4 �. 4y 4 ` u O V O P`•, Y U u g r U.N � m w.Ci `�V 4>'^ P n.E b�9 EGE.D L la M.r. � ` > H 4." �'�CG MO ej ICY.. � y nGY ,n J.�.O<� N MO C`^•w 1�-. Y q O 44� rb� iL GI IJw--V 'CN <N ruM Q q J 9 V� Y y rr. �Gn 0{1 c u 9 Y A` - 94 U s 5✓J.�a�' .re.� � 9Y W QY _O �itUk d q r =Y yYy 2Y�bj O 9 t2.2 rar arm u SON yO.n6 4 .YGC �.0 C y Y 9 6 .n G C s•.n 4 W �m U �V u 2 G� S r N d [) -.b L Y `y ^U �'y Y O`u 9� q� V Y.r`` � a'Y -gP L G q L 4.� q s W O� � �.� �b i Y • II �..>u aErom ..c.'c4.r wc.� � Tug gaiv �=H�^� LPo"� _�• i Y� o` �_ LO yy UC w y 9�a NC Lu 9�U w+4 E=y�Y�• €V'd . � � �9 V.c 4 'c C u .YY. Y a or1U.LC�'VU C� q>y4 4L G� �i u5C up.q. n- u % !, 2 . v �7 uE j=ou.�'.'. —o�a ryurn L^ t`n 40 "—� C r 3 S ucao'agLo _ aT, ». a' `'= ^ � �a`'.'a 'o� c ` n•o. Fu E`arc" �iy,^`" emu« c cam.."_' J ErE•ti Y. r= L.q" w. 1O��p n o _= Y: < �.� 9ru,n Oy >u pp r �^ Lc`G N yE 0 O •-ua4i� d. OD— L q .. b rY ."p qr U � s r mJ� Ia�.K Wr —rq� OYpa.n Ca �� uurV ,4 •`OV +.L "C K 6y��vyn vt3C b _J 4�u G4 C U !� +Y-E N ,N L1n uOaA gNiY ? ` Y. MGt r A GG qei>rb o—r..rG q L2Y >��Y l�.f �?ac. �'F``� �`ggOn 4..^� Gov � —•. c•-y 4q u 4 O^..«qy � u= L ZR c' o c 4Pq IuY Y.'t=�".L ��•r-n ��{.t. K r� =e._L. cL Lo«d,:u " 4 1-G•.00 0.�,�4=Y w~. Lr4YC>i n�b0 1.51 i1 `^ � ' YH C r •.Y N Gi Y j0. �: LOJ Wn Vt� r � icb o �aUi '% '.,"„ vc .'+ x •oi � c°' 90 r" c c•yc- C L LS �^ CiC VM V. 4-1 .a• Y b`�pp' i.� ^ p Lb xfu 9V .-L kii u4 O G•- b L C e- N Nw G ¢.p r C t V b C l i b u� F = •t �' ..C C . C� •.»`` ^` C .L1 w� q� NY Y� Di q Y p �+ +4= V C U G u b •+.� u c� v UN�`D =Y ¢ `g 4'oq �b L cj «G N a. " .� i-��=.D Yc �c qa• zqo n'=^ a "` s -� a .. c �•+ �� .� o� me o � ¢cD ^ue ::y D� wip o� io _� �� .:.� r�� s� 36 OL CDr'2 'LL d God quo JN �` yaN 4w. .\ pY n 4� yV 4l Y ) J Q• E Y4C � Gr y `d 9L j �a�r i u'> W�L « C C�•J V n S W Y ^y i« L• N z p ^'Eg.P « iaL NbA «D. 9 OL u D •A Oqu L�{..M b`E ��< r LSO +c �V at �}YN �•w •� X LYV C Y uS..N •^ YL 4Y�.�A. V¢ LO _ ggC Ln0 >Y.O ` GN y ^ tiP "a<, p F� CNY•O Co`.Lu vt; E Y... x W ~� !tG�i u i3q G� ci Cq yj n ~< yY� Lam¢^uS ~'.L- vtiYA MLy �u up xt ...6� �¢ n _� G GL..=.. �« S.1u�n` • C.+•G� � b Ca ^= 3Y G S V nC «W.�..�a eC•.+-Ci «O ��, L,iV M V out i ^'L -o „D. D.a �a bo L� �.Lbi ai a�n. � •- X X� ^ .'.e.cc cu�wN �c�a �'� I� u'.o �... w N� ten+' ¢2. �Y K. �•.p.0 y.,ij ^ �l GJ ~�•� ¢ ... Y^ '�,=o- c .a•". n m". LOJ y uV. vG iai^o c •�= Yr u,"u; L,D cir ui i 'tom uE u� 4tVdOT is•�3 ?f.:� aV u Z� n o .c�`.�_ �� !^ son � .c.d d_u �• ��du U U�J � Lno L04 .•. A oDu` nu O�n.,O. jy cEi�y. u 2 C v a OC.JuA., >E ;ri �I RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMOWGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT NO. 9649 LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HERMOSA AVENUE AND WILSON AVENUE IN THE VERY LOW DISTRICT - WHEREAS, on the 16th day of July, 1986, a complete application was filed by Tag Management for review of the above-described projgrt; and WHEREAS, on the 24th day of September, 1986, the Rancho Clj amonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above-described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the'R`neho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as F follows: SECTION 1: That the following"can be met: " 1. That the prcposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and 3. That 'the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Develop ant Code;, and 4. That the proposed use, to;tether with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public ."eaith, safety, or wslfare, or materially injurious to properties or 'improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That Design Review for Tract 9649 is approved subject to the following conditions and attached Standard Conditions: 1. Greater variation of front yard setbacks be provided to improve visual quality of the streetscene. 2. On elevations where wood trim is not a prominent feature, architectural detailing around windows shall be provided through the use of stucco plant-ons. 3. All applicable conditions of Planning Commission Resolution No. 82-46 shall apply. Y, A_#4-' v y PLANNING COMMIS5If1N RESOLUTION X September•24, 1986 DER for Tract 9649 a x: page 2 } i 4. A perimeter block waft shall be required e.-�ng the Wilson Avenue and Hermosa. Avenue frontages. Ttie design of the wall shall be shown on the landscape plan and shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the 1ssuan6e of building hermits. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, .1986 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA kF � BY: '. Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, epu y eu i1'- ar', I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and k�. regularly introduced, passea, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular mating of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of September, 1086, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 1 i J I i i eYLQa.yaL VY�. p�V.6 COV ut6 YY.N.de �L ap�0€. Uviw] OL LOC LL11 Y w N. $ O �d u4w.iug qC- aF d� LA i n��AH ^CM qCa`y d L •� v�q YyO Cti 6�G q C'p fl OIGYr�N R U W�J�NV Cy �u`OY SCR `y� Q O. � Ya c 0 •z V�� tCM� Y:Tr yYO qY �1.0.� AQGL7 wa L� ty eOpp N {S •� CC L .t.r.9•C. 4a. 4pQ..ei v�.0 EVr x.. uoZ q u..Y.c' p'ctiao Ynp, Etl..au� Cu.Y w.0 Vooq, wgtl a cit.9 O GW•'aaN yV. Y�p,N. L LOL+ � S A.u.AYO EWE �9wwa � � a M y E'Y U L 6 d y�1.•P M O L V v. ^V N .O A''V> C.O N C u.'N�Y. e O S. y�V L'^66��OLS.iI W �N `0�,..�d N■y r��L 8V N YL C�CA OS L.OY qpf. GO2 V QALO 6NNCN. Mqe rL^ 0. Vpp. _ aE V 7^. yqu� C te.'YaY NOC iO�9.M fSi Lw�� _C j�a�p'i > O J a N CC {per... O.aL y�ar+.LOe�'N N g1' ^LLq>r y NLO L Qeo w�onaue n S "oq n!a 90•>�"u wiCyi�"� zz t. .. � gLNG ..0. �NeC.Yv NN p �O 9 G. VUY •4CNCd Yw y_46Na yw0.. `tl"V 9y �� pq Q .�C E tl a a O.w+0o a.NN-ugn.saa Lqi VI `cdoN cutl an.N-S Ye142, C C � �� O �^^ q E pq• N� T 9^'Na LO N u L Y 2 LL L Y r.W ■gN=Oy l.�r V qY6 ' q MP O OOdp C.N.'. ~Z' J Ya0 q4 Ue�L�VaV.C~L so Q g n y E Y Z `\]UT • u. a nw Y .`-. O C y cjV1�.Y.�. G O' (�V A yI rOF q dN CC~ ydK NNt M = Y � O■CN w.O O.a+.� C � � � N 2 O C� Y N E �•+�E. O.N py 66 � ` Y � Yw yy� C V 0�•�.VC�RaeC L in g� 10 4�aI q0. L tl.�w Qp`Q y�O 3�'s o �LsNq QNL S 4 • 4 � a.. ... YH J • N 1.1 • ^l. �J d JO Y I I YI O�c ,ppY C..GO.L CG+'106 24g1. b «"G 9Ya Y a^ o p _ a MIAL Y a E 6-_ n� EC y U aV a LTC O W p 6 ^E Y� pwA.o RY OA uOaAM 4q>c End Yw,Z q ..q n0 C? C O.LAis.4 ^ YO V 6 M b C Q o u ten.. �� o>.`; L{= �,YOw ♦. =u c u gJ o• ut ou u.-.N."'o `.'p,...o Y.N 4.GL. a i`�Y N.q aoLryuN �u� O o"'r^ aqN v++os xy.6Y."' `vu .cec` mrp..Ln �' oy uia aa. A L U L m ird GM OI vE> U 9 Fw. pY Zw. c i a "aow �a oa. iu .n� cs.a' Tq.Y- uva. pNfl� a• b« w _ rangy Y. vAYo`. xo a^wooV;w. pLLa � a Y yei u�N ao �N.. au• n L.ri •oki Sa >.aNb 'YGw N2« Hw �� Y^�xo Qu.5 G`o a xONbu oN L a' ao moBi�u^N cu .c - L a xa a ��. - V. N O =p PO n t'c.' u Y 2.Y sYan m rn o u w rY t7 ti N , b ei 6 Yq cq ' �^qm u curC � SS a.L. Yc, N "2-6. Y Y` ^ Y N� y S tN. LO,Q W • a 4 C w y..W�q YN VEllsc �GC� ^N NO pa VqL C1L -C ^CEL�C tylr ^L.r^O L R'< u CYO - tlY uY>v �Cu uy C 1 ...db AN Nq NAY r ' V o N.LUO LL A 4-Y 6 .-. Wx •N 4pbV tJiC NL �r�YY .�2 A• NLY �O L+r- O. Y ..«ip N« ...�6 GLSN �y 0 y L V N U .Le.Gi p. n Q.cNr L>c n00 CN1L Qr wb qN�-'Nq zr aapy ¢v on" t.`o aY�op«. be xV-.V oav '9 L V^O.- Y6x10 C b- bV �b>z NGt.y EE b� O.0 L� AwN 'V r L9 day y e• O ^.� ..._aa p L c VftLO � u�Y u�qC O =U .uY a`LO S'l. C VDU �^ xo �q A wMC N' Ny yY Vv_�"'AL O�>:r c r �.L.n E Y9 b'U tOi rA~ .' c c G..O_•r Nn U�E t p^ Ea C Y4Y wO+��M>'�Cbi O.fYtgT. � )L dyb a _ pewu�, no�N 000 � 4AOL6 `M6 I�LNC CwC Vq 4Y JM.06YAd A+r+� F�.Y NCA ��A46L d~NO CY P� L YL l N>Iq� COPY O• L9 Ja0 c O 8 O'00. YL �< L E bL VN�. NY dC -tlV N A9 P` T as>'ql 0. Ly.9 BC9 t< y p U° q q 0 Y A. c ^u a L c ICI N�qt�v aM d ON Sp 'q Z.C O A P^No NNu a 9c o, L• q9 btu. Vwy�Y Vy ?�0.... l,``yl Oy.Gq Y y 1�� 4'V Yu°gw`N`y1d Y0. w w^A EyyE C• C ly >�SA Y OyNu q V V Q.J� j ql• • V L '90b OUvi�..N j'i C it^N 'rSA NYCN r ..N C o`� O y Y ,L N C • Y C d V w V' IN�.•" iatn $.'.l P rtlY.9 pO��.vQ' .°-t a toN usiow•- N eue uq at p^ am oq xo^'ow ay1�-- 9 Nat •O PVOV N_1✓! r.L 0.NG 0.L ..0.9Y aN PzC = O r ScON L.. qVy. 0.O b O 0. Oq yq...L.' O'O 6y GS •qpV Oy�j ay&• >^ nGJ= Et `9yW P O to t' 6t� �C.. Ttb qY O�. N06�Pq OIV° y FayO N C St o y.i t7 V LO 6N s. a1tl tl }NCCan NYYo S= Y° YS (� L p-LWD 1 L LP. aJ0. YV yN '��„N P. Coy`' �tl aNL= cr 0.p 0 Y... G L I O W FJN gtlW V dqN O� q.y fin. G V ydrgC}. 0.L6 mod. O U^OiOYC nqv YP �O �OIpM.q y qd. G. CT C Y wya NOO- t9V. L ySq Sr qY t1 y �ayi Y F may. CY YLw �.H G P L� O� �yyG C iV °L N�.N N <N� iM 2N0 FN.n `N V•�•'+PT 01SM60 K tl�JY <Y lt.OvpN � e I ^w P y 9 Y L _.- 'w 1:5 wa. .-. ACC GS q� _6 L Nti d �� S>^q ° tl� �N.O NC Lq'v. .y Ny IL bSl-L Z: G cc O at y yN Y�w^ L Fy q^ 9N Lq,a„�• au SL i1eA� s C•- N w �Y6 Vyy Lp Y iQ L�'o .y �.9 t= C '•' P U w N N W ^'.11 O L P Y 0V. >lT0 A L p Y .G N V L a M gm! C 66C L€L� s �N VV S° ^ _ONY pVw O N•"• @� C=y..C. L >IyC NYN nb C �q.L.. N q• Nu V �y y�3. y6 S^2 6h .g =9.NVO A V Ly Z. G4ay 0.�.L0.q L V qE S y° �L yy 9^„»� -• V L N N ,C .^ 2 c C L L= 'y: q S 9 Y 6 don O.G Y Ld ^N•Ow vOi L>N •° Ny~O Q L T °.0 y Y Euu N 6.� y CO•V- = TYOV L�9•n E9 u0 aYdiO � UN 0.Y' N °� Ov••-� �W q dy SLLt�CV 9 � S�9 » G � aLYtrO a9gC L,�E qy� yNO6 V L C'4 Ni yL P� E d NO OQ�9C yP qL O. A L:U 9yp� UGC y4.V �N yCO 1 O N.9 Y'oq �N YOB . 'S� �aYr byq , u `^ _Y•nC _t R- 0.L -"' V - O> t°J L L NN■■ G = •�YNO C"-m T E.y YO. �! LL6L i9N 1"•nYt <U 49 M6'. 48K Ot <N6w W0.6.•N�YO... W cap Y F y Y Ua • wy �� Lua °c'ua u.ub Ldc x onX.o 9d^� pdaci YtsCi.CaE NV F4.0 G0. . Ol ^9.ft V1. A O � Y .. «v0a oV =V0 9 NLY yt1°} L u od U d...N L t . 1c.ca r, C!'J ydjS= Cdil CNL E . =Y- aY � O V`^ p. F m �Jo GM.. p ^Ny wGsd FnYY d0 �YZ CL Z. •� yr a � n n z.E`.9, OR Rx..+0ea �Y N w a Y y m C y^ O Y �OICOA wOY � IVM. gaYMY �R Y. ^ �q o.N CGo ¢bN CNL Y OY �.0 dH L 6 y.T ��> N u Y� q.0 u q V w t�' SOW^b •.Y.^ 4,.' ^ 90c N GC L «C•1. q • S y. tl �>2 F Sw�r�. Y T 06 � N U'. 20 09 L. O NE Y OTC �dr��d M N • OG V G9� O N^ NCr ac ^ n= N u d u . Wm C O r0 E Eny E . r.'o C b U.Gd _u c c 19 C A E L d 0 0 J p w O a C 0 9 «Qf Nd^� dG>W^ p6 L C GE - dC y yd^ ~ •�i•O Yam.«OLC� O E v ^AYY r9. L O r. f�A9Nt C Y^a J= y r C L G w 6 n L 1-•<Lp� Z.�.Y.NO 1� O UWL L06�4.V1 y^Wrrp N 6YG Y ` . N ^ gj ^mod G Yn ^�O NCYO .Ly t quw ua Olt Iou ti mi YY V 3 ea tC L N q C6C C N . 'c N C C L (� C d «G 0. G V OrY O C C 19.. Ln 'O O A^y U U .Y y g 4 3 9 92 woa Ste V Y ..�.• •Jpa O p U>f y'O« =d^ i d C w L d�� _Z S w N a b 9 A �•« "L a 2Oc '•' _w NC^ a N« �E..N� ^O• .G G.. G a p �O C t� O�q � c N E^' • E L n C L?%q G� ^.0 G. R.L=Cc= C G«U Z • � S C � M E L an M =.....N aN C YY 6�C _d Y' « ydp G a EE9 N ww,u E L yMyy E C4q L2 ^•J^a MO?O O: Ew'ca �v YO ^ O•'•� a WO ^ N U w C N B Y W _ b ndy� d VU p p ' 6.. 'd Oi vnpy Yp d ..«may d c^ N Eoaci .� O q •' A Z N �L y N 0 l am^ M C p«L G �y M d 6 Q 9✓ ID.j!�r•. o ^as oY am" '_a qw,G puu _ 9a,•L+a�, rnoo.` e�� Im Esc o n.Y. Na qra uw Mso'O nY.� �eo. sa` maY. cAN� E v dr u G p = pp •N.1 AO 2rC. U �O C�aC C CKCwO ^ v_ A cs ^ ^"d'Ne pa Gt o .w- occ Is!:s a.. cru. yuq,o: U 1 « u CLN C PEW LC L^ �'9 NN1Y YY •�L O Cu ^ NO « �q+ LCaa.R ! N Cf i 0 Y• S.- 1 q L 4 OC L V n y00 SO ._✓y $y s. y w U- i � L L O Y a Y ✓_V OJ9u 6.0 M'.CJ ' I 4 r w.•�O L os''- o�$ L •T' � M��c N Op0 'Yr✓N+ C. L+ n L LJ ..II� wE _ •,q� 'co qq u=cN eW .-yyM z' 4LE OY ✓L. +NC IC �L ` V♦l M� 9V y4- vE LNq� p L OY C y Otl.G pC V. YNLY�C1' 6YY vY � L y R VVL J Vp M r U pN y.N N 01D li w.O + N Y O w 6 Y Ce qN �.o wa Y✓ o =.cc� w s a LL ^ v N sa4.E 4' v Tow �'tc ✓.. u` t`. $. o a t`� ` a u =••%S ^NOOw.Eu S T TV"i IFS a L6 Yr I.^,•.M: gg yy cy 'Yi xoe to 0 2 N 1�1 K' Yf 1D re ^I 3� u W ..1 . J C Y q q q 9 t U T A C « V ✓ L O q m C rLi OtOC J a 01 a .5 CJnV C Y�.E 8 m L a • =m6 3g=a 90 OY'351 Cd- a �Y�^aYwio0V� 92 �uq is 9 tiI immz=p `�oaoea Y S- ��y �a� • ar'f c �� qai �i v^,�.$ 'c+ €LtYp IL .4IU qy ate. S� Cwu•' '— T O Lt w b�' Y 'S. T a L EE�`q — Jr O Y C V �q 91. aid Oy a. �8 Ut 44W OC' paQ9 y qu✓M V21 u b.C u E `� T N A< O G O 6✓ Y N Y✓ M'�W C u y 6� •�� qn Y{`D RP °Y` wE Y .a' m^NLE LVmu aEi nuC b +^ Tq^ t ♦� c L n.0 C • C Obi pb Li �u ^L 9 V u pu Y �w O Oy{• O E>pOp =y Nu .^...� O�Y Gw L'yy NY L � O �"a ✓w �Cp+ Ny N� » Y.�Y•u ^o .R Y '6 +n6C1 �R7��y YN�✓^ "'l G p p Z.. WE L OM V r0� �� O LCgOY buC Yaw3i.0y .Oo d`O V cE Om.• O IJC .V. rY o Tu TC yL'..0. u ea CH NY L4 q ✓ c .-✓ p V LN oN u4 ++� o^ =•� ��i.4.n Yv> '"o.NT.Av '� 12. WN9 WUIJ �6 t0�62 •C� <.O KC1 Y O� < d Y N 1.1 f N RJ • N {p UYiL LG 4GV CO M pY.� r0 0 v C O ��U �y + • 4u Ode nM N..L M YW .� 9a1•e s .Y C Cq c C :R �N •Se I�! yR... YO yw•t Y G� N�NT.Y N .� 4 ^"' f,�.. �2� COC tg1 pp CL pC i.w LCC O n VaCi 6� vw 00� u p Y Nd� � G M w A dO 4 N¢O. YN `a +VaLiY "L O.CC _ LN CyL Oy `3'. Lt! N.L wu N c�j. 7t rt.4u.. f v. `$. au Q`./ 4v Via.• 4 oi� 6� �M Y` vy.J...� n� w a` •A ay _o eu a qvo yo. oRw c� ^N _^ + Nu �N �W mac. R Y..'"s^ if c�' •"_ � _` u �w. � u�a yc n ac _ c c^ W Y)�.Y M` Np 6�M 6ca WYN LYi ZR LQI..p tti p. hr•.O •`.. fNVWlk N Y Iz r $u u ":. uw moo• p� •.y." _rn'u o��. nu �y N u6 pL v O O+� iC'^Y PO • Td p Cw N p 44G=� a` auu h j Y¢ a�L. V u6t q0 B w�• C pJ up U n' N— . O N� C��N C L p W W N V Y n N P r•d N 2 ' fry RT �u •x L ��i c �� u ca., yq! pa 2OT C TN ULO ^�� NM V taY �. 4 g9N �K.N y Ey � N�yyEEy VI yMY 1 Y VG' ^.�0 `pL G.7 N�0 YN� KPL W2 0 t�M♦ KL U U�Y LL+� .Li CCY 2LE SJ 9+ CNW N6W w� KOW L• Fppp a 0 i O.. 1 n ' • 1 rN u aq au w a olaw a b«o c^e` az a u �a @ n S a�R q rnu o s" a ` �", ` n :•a O Q y�l Ey.K�Of w y�� U p W i u Lvl o wY�. e n it u E L W M ^L 6L ba�i g i.9 YL MLtf O —nU C L$ q9 .LUiUC aO —� LOW U 1 •CL 6 y� YC yw� «^ a. U` 3.' -ZA q O y - U 01 yl E u H wl�a a n y` ��'pp� W V U uCC U� u Y LL•• .� C YwO L y L ~VI L lQ.. L C bCC qu tT9 Ua Yt v�� d��g6 Y.«�U' CL^b a6iw �y WN PLn Qw q EL Sew- !_SY�l,. ..NLO Y4C CGi n- d i4OMz 1=n rasC �a'u t� � CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA C�1CAM0 STAFF REPORT r O Q F z DATE: September 24, 1986 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott MJrphy, ,Assistant Planner SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 1.2237 AND 12237-2 - NORDIC IiE�EC - Design Review of building a eva ans And plot pans for ten (10) lots within h+o previously recorded tracts: (12237 and 19237-21 in a Very Low Density Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per.acre) located on the east side of Hermosa Avenue, ' eth of Hillside Road - APN 201-452-01, 02, 24, 25, 26; 201-463- 09, 14; 201-291-05, 08, and 10. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Design Review of building elevations and plot p ans. B. Project Der;sity: Less than 2 dwelling units per acre. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North=bounty of ban Bernardino. South - Single family residential; Var ;Low Density Residential (less than 2 du/ac) East - Vacant; Flood Control. West - Vacant; Very Low Density Residential (less thau 2 du/ac). D. General Plan Designations: Project i:Fe ery LOW Density Residential Hess tha,, du/act. North - Flood Control, open Space. South - Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 du/ac) East - Flood Control. West - Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 du/ac), Park. E. Site Characteristics: The ten (101 lots are located within project. Seven (7) of the lots (Lots 21 and 26 of Tract 12237 and Lots 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 of Tract ?2237-2) have �i Red Gum Eucalyptus trees throughout the parcels. Some preliminary grading and tree removal has taken place on the northern portion of Lot 26 of Trar.t 12237. ITEM 8 PLANNING COMM1SSLON STAFF REPORT •� �j DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACTS 12237 AND 12237-2 p September 24, 1986 r page 2 II II. ANALYSIS: 8. Background: Tract 12237 was originally approved by the liana g"comnission on January 12, 1983, as a custom 'tat _ subdivision of 87 parc,ls on 55.97 acres of land. The major design objective was the preservation of the existing. grove of Eucalyptus trees by using minimal grading and custom housing design to fit the natural topography. At that meeting, the Planning Commission expressed concern .over the impact development would have On the Eucalyptus groves., As a result, _f a Condition of Approval was included stating that the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictionns (C.C.&R.'s) shall be } prepared for the project to preserve the existing trees. Additionally, provisions were contained in the C.C.&R.`s for the maintenance of trails and to minimize grading. B. Gtreral: The applicant is requesting Design Review approval to Zeverop ten (10) lots throughout two phases of Tract 12237. The applicant is proposing three floor plans with three different building elevations per -floor plan. flan 2200 is a single-story unit, 2,200 square feet in 'rea. Plan 2650 is a two-story unit, 2,620 square feet in a ._ Plan 2700 is a two- story, 2800 t uare foot unit that steps down seven feet from front to rear. C. Design Review Committee The Design Review Committee o tr gt nary revs eae Ile plans for the ten lots on August 21, 1986. At that time, the Committee expressed concern over the floor plan proposed for Lot 11 of Tract, 12237. The Committee stated that the flat building pad proposed was not acceptable and a unit should be provided that would step down to more closely fit the contours of the land thereby reducing the amount of grading needed to construct the building pad. The Committee suggested either providing a completely different. elevation of Flan 2700 so as not to give et appearance of the same plan being used on three Consecutive lots, or provide a new €loor plan and elevation. Other modifications proposed by the Committee included the continuation of the architectural detailing used on the front elevation on the house side of the garage and also wrapping around the corners and extending down the side of both the left and right elevations. On September 4, 1986, the Design ReNicw Committee reviewed the revised building elevation for Lo$ 11 of Tract 12237. The modification reflected a new elevation for Plan 2700 which was recommended for approval by the Design Review Committee. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACTS 12231 AND 12237-2 September 24, 1986 Page 3 C .y III. RECOMMENDVION: Staff recommends that the 'Planning commission approve the elevations, and plot-plans through the adoption of,the ` attached Resol°ution with Conditions. c ctfully mitt. , . Bulgy r City Planner DC:SMskr, Atta+hmentss Exhibit "A" - Site Plan Exhibit "B" Grading Plan Exhibit "^_" - Building Elevations rr Resolution of Approval Ak r I I i i p'r a.axfy�)Nfiwl d..fr nr..w dl • _ lltYfMW rSK 6•SaneNf � • � 1 1 ( 26 are A t�mVt i - o r � 1\:. � auN ♦�a7 s.::a l..y.. �, i iffy • '...• • 7{!!;;(,��!��,��_(((\\\\\^^^^^'''•••••• •• °tv4 r� fri Dana)r.It TR CT NO j 7 —�2 l•C �ue`�'wr•o rnwn 1 1 t� i�jt t 3 l 1 • Sf•i'2` � SinnXN+1 ' ( ' ) 11 aYAYta .aE6ii COOa7 ST11P iON•MGO° i l ,y1 ~67� ) LSarn6a� •-i.rs.^ - .- fury SCALE V•$O' RAjL CHO CUC IMOiNGA TrrrE=___<sr PLANNING DNLSEYNI _ it EXHIMT. 3GlLE= GRADING CONCEPTS _ THE WOODS a.M.e,P.lwl,<t«r wy .Aw.R P.,.:w...W:�«•.., TRACT t 12237 LOTS 0r10,11.21,A 26 YwtYrY9 n.,YN,P W atrYwYwn.J W f.tJ _ TRACT t 12237-2 LOTH'1.2,B,7,A• ra,uer,n,.a tN Y Im,ii Y.a a.M r.n,1• i JSl1—.,->�� '� a••nYa hsWa.r Iw„[NrY 4w J..t Yy/��. � n ( r MK 1M+'iaw! yq twM,NrNYru w.nelf R ,p�f'�.:-'•��\..� ` TYPICAL PRWALI DDIIEWAY DETAIL - a P,M L,.M,.,>u. AN.,i.r•4'•rr•.,MtM<.,JN AL IJ�w!•I.,.IM fr U.,,Y rM aWY Win( Z..,r NAYI!2 J'W av/1!n�. .W.a.tw..A„r.Y ..t sYgr. �---•...�•... .�1 na+ //i` r•wf ,/ Yr_ _yL TYPICAL'VIVA.;DRIVEWAY DETAIL �r'•�,U.l. �r+r^� _ _' • 6•+, `t _ICI jj�� _..-�- tv r , p \ � /fit '' �� ``_"°� 1•' r ��` I • , .� ,��` it k�i•tom. �rl � �� 1 ��Y=�ccl�'�`� nor ©r -2 sc,u.I-•..a . CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN DETAILED SITE PLAN _ I��OEtI'Fi CITY or,AJO T-�AMT r i'TGZ I--`L��-*�'-�'. /a�37 GA TtTLE1- �x.9�P . PLANNING MgSIQN -� EXHIMT: - ' E=---___ ew.:. ~•\ 'PAD.? 71 iccr\ N=•.... l OT 26 'S\�\` LOT 21 \, C S'r .\\ `PAD.•!2 �/ �. �' v _ t LOTS 9, 10 I N40 CITY Of, R-A i GIO CUCAA'10i GA Trru= PLANN:NG D n-gaN 3_C EXHIBIT: mm v , -� aToo-Q .� 013 FRONT ELEVATION �r Lail I RIGIIT SIDE ELEVATION r• RANCHO C UTCA.I-O�CA Trr -- �I pLANNI-N3^b'.JlSON N; o w{, W , w t - 3 • 1 1 S CITY OF, UL is RANCHO C,lUCATMO17Gr"j PLANNING_DTVUaN- nt +ar �4 2700-8 i t a"r C3I�C1L'1 QL� QQl�G7 ==. s' FRONT ELEVATION' ' .�•• 1 .. xRIGHT_SIDE ELEVATION. CITY OF, T T rrEXI-� '' KANcH0 Ct�CAMO\GA Tom: ,9,� lQ f I.A'`iNIi� ^LET`:?f5tC io1 „G EXHIBIT- f3 SC kLE it o. { A n iV �EE 1 _ _ 17=1 F- IE El 0 f' yn'Cr �Fl � Wq W qC �3 W FE I. El fig € s � Y44� r—�—Firms" L $ 1 LL . O G CITY OIF ITENI- AO-f' ,r'- /a--?,?7 V�/a i RANCH() CUCAMONGA TITLE: PLANNING DiVISK)NL SCALE, Y k F 2700=-" K3 t FRONT ELEVATION Y".''mot'`w.av'T aF= tirf�.aw rnla'r7� - ,� r' 11I04T SIDE ELEVATION CITY Q.I. rra is -- la�:714 .�32_ �iANCHO C�;CAi'V ONGA TITLE: , PLANNING DiViSnN4 _of EXHIBIT: c-5 sG�r t yu F ll'Ii`cq 4' LU a w n n r y 3 t • �1 r F� — 1 , O 337Zs1� cc i �S S� Y CITY O 7 rrEN,i Q RANCHO �..}�...,CAMONGA Tri LE: PLANNING DFV-.-7.a`z Brr-- -- f DO Lien DO - 00 j. QO :s W W W on�n ti x M p CITY 01" RANCHO C,TQVvI0l GA TrrLE ✓/il"IDrtfS '' PL4I`3NING DM SON a -!�3 EYHII33+f.--- _SCALE- o or[DID � L'f-IcU 0 6 � Mll CITY OF } RANCHO CUCAMUNGA TITLE,_ ff4 Y54 IO PLANNING DIVLSn f_ ae :� t La 2� .� •i: � W ) � a: ❑ W f ❑OCl t b f .Im $' W j � W i i�t AF- cr LL m 1+ F J C yy 6' n� R ANC O CUC.AIMONG z: I E. € srr�a us PL.ANNI1G M ISM / EXHIBIT.- - SGII E: • Vy7 01 FIFF] (CID) 1 p rli .y i I �� •1`` 8 m i r rl I Lug ,- - a a s' -- - �• , Ci ry OI4 RANCHO C.TCAIAONGA r-,' f PLANNING DIVISIQN _ _ALE: E= i i - M . e = = '� a CD i `w T FF=jl 1 - ►3t, i' - l�! �� _ \J � Lam) ,.y t `i .Z 3 CITY.OF rrL t: FANCHO CLCAMONGA. TrrLE: PL•ANNI\G DNIS'aySG�►tET t 710 .. C 1 141 t.. GC , - t ! K { 1 1 � ul E3 l a . cl� ol RANCHO C.LCA.s O1 GA '?frLE SG"IE= 77 . „ RESOLUTION NO, . A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION .APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACTS NO. 12237 & 12237-2 0 AM, ON THE EAST SIDE OF HERMOSA AMENUE, NORTH OF HILi.SIDE ROAD IV' THE VERY LOW DNSITY RESIDENTIAL . DISTRICT: WHEREAS, on the I th day of July, 1986, a complete application was filed by Norse, Development Com.4aay for review of the above-dea.ribed prOject; and WkEREAS, on t116 24th day ref September, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a mseting to consider +he above-described project. follows- 1% THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga planniog.Commission resolved. as SECTION ].: B!;dt the following can be met: 4 R 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the Genaral Plan; and 2. That the proposed use is 3n accord with the e ? objective of tre Develop•ent Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located, and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance With each Dui° the applicable provisicis of the Development Code; E and 4. That Ue proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, wily not be -detriment-al to the public health, safety, oe welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improveme'4ts ire the vicinity. _ { SECTION 2: That Design Review for Tracts 12237 & 12237-2 is approved su � t to the following conditions and attached Standard Conui°tions 1. Architectural detailing used on the front eicvatir,n shall be used on the house side of the garage. 2. Architectural detailing used or, the front elevation mall wrap around and extend down the side elevations. 1 i PLA04--,d% COMMISSION RESMA tI:ON NO. DESIGN RCVIEWb FOR TRACT 12837 & 122-, ,a September 24, 1986 •., Page 2 } APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1986, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA a BY: .� inns tout,. Chairman ATTEST° y '`Brad u I er, epu;yecre ary z _ ' 'e I, Brad Buller, Deputy Zecretary of the Planning-Commission of the City'of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby 'certify that the foregoing.Resolution was duly and k regu)-arly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning C Anission of the k City of Pdncho Cucamr;ga, a repular meeting of the Planning Counission held' on the 24th day of September, 1986, .by the following vote-to-wit:. i..i AYES: COMMISSIONERS' F F= ?DOES: COMMISSIONERS: A6SENT: COM-MISSIONERSt :x I i j j j I r J if -u L pGyV � y tl4 7Ly �� .. � ♦� Ga u.GroY nUM d. �V N n.. CO q O��E �� E I.O� ,. u.,•,.a c e i u p•_ .` a p v Y p v n x b i.� O C 6 p L 0 E 6 C V�'e L aii p tl o�E i n vyrnl rr _ c G _ Cn.`aG 3� tUO. y N`�•G.. .L..L�G Y 4VV 6 U.��. NL Fn;.Y 6YI Lp ICY^L O E`60V .�tl C. uAO=^ .•7 La O.vpi y uti y Qom~ a GE an Y Y aM L ? p YY..vv ACp. L U 9pU S O O tl E 0 6 �•. OCL� Lw a G 3.Yn4 UO Yt V ro P1 #4 n Y` N. i � OL yaY jY•E �bppy.. }ytLi .O." C� C.pNV�9. =LT E Yp� i�aE ZOCL06C Y .LEP r. N ^ Yw CC. OE y�,p 1 _ ca •. ... Ya T caH Aoa�dn 1+ a� a nN 7M w Y <•-� cN�'�o C y C 75 ae is nl p V O O N.�ti C F` �. tlro� d,�a,Y. O^ 9'LaY. SOS PY,RQ Oi PU A� bC�4I d}N. .4 bO .r..NvLOd` .DL Yr� Gam Cw>>!r ytrtr G+N•. ^fib YQ. �, E V Wg a G N L Q mb•�O N w^+YtiR^ Y' O . p «v ti. + �..-1.. WyE+N p•,•O �.ti Y. 'rY V�COiV LL. n^U. �V '/ U N 69 a M L O E O O G d N C V a• 4 N V u 2 <A Y m �C d L mU Y Hf 22 m • Z 'Y y �' M a L u C M D O LR•-•+qEdd 'n8 � o �jeNaca�� - �J EEEE Y � • L N U v N O H uC • „•� n...YY L.O►C b n�NF�,L Eq 6� � O V Y •u I +.N M'CYr^U V 90 o.'G• >; E O. N Olna•. V O p O O O U IT �O Q 8 qp y9 N A yy Lp a� w �/!�� < 3-2/ �ctc so qav q°,moy o ^u s.v g uo .p at Y Caao,"' .0 use aoLE o pd,q v...-�u ae^ �naa M3N �OLyuua»ou r�p`«q y•�^ y Nov>.0 oQ rl h Query uu"X pwp«uooY.cc «Lds N YMd « i^u' 4n trl: ,p E uCL u N„•a+ o'awo d Y m a.onad.'.a o�K. 9, >&n« w 1�r Nq ^EUN C6u 6L0dU>^A,qj 9n?p.. Od �� tv dIO 9>. L y b y L 0 L L yU cy S y j J�+ b ^A "co oa ` p. �'� coa'q M«p• wqw d,.,a^?� na•;;v�YGvo �''" � Nng.� �A Ganya N a -Al C W V ><3 L L ^9 g 6 L _ n U U C t > yN 99M p q Y LY d£Yr• YN.A� iO aGiN � L>6ii a` f 1 c >H N..q C 1.5 l G o Y d L p Y N Y N •N y C Y y A P Ord E =C I L C V Y p L Y N O N C y c ECAu'14.aG C-��yQ4�y OT Zu G, N^ Uil q w�ydY ~u��rrg0 N tdn Orr 6N�. YJ CaL+»�_ O 'Ca+NN I.,;- o a .G • .sn.•w U][.L Yam . . OLY� GCv ^ O W y YO�� Y>CC d'�y.V�•• O�V NL c4.VL G M ul"'.0 LLB 3G •Opp dl •OO r 29 � p..G. Ut4 yL� yCU MY`N OY O�G. �,v�i LeC �•! uu gg u gg L 4 ZL V E Cf� Q n H RabaV�c� YY EV i PU L�L OY�. G xgwE�eY gLiO aq A�N 6UC u m- u rY �.. 4Easic � NA E q�C nE puC yTN CO wM O a6 •�OwV. N Y4 i _ p L U C J•r t Y� q y w .Gr 6.lq U^. •.` ^ ^ .i t� � L .a. �A O�^G > 6C bu.•` >l' L \ C 04 LOtN pCyt» A4jd Y Un L p.. M= pa,w E a S t G w YL� Il C at dbLI_. • 3N CUA-L q Y C Y Y CL Y NO. @wN n �yli�9 LO L as '2 ^ A 6 CC >,r E N G. C •.>.•^mayu K y 2> ., o.. » Uo L�' A.G.w Y�V a.1 ♦W�. LO Y VC�Ni U -tit ^LzN O ^QC O Y » G nE@ O^•Y 00 Y puL- .Li1 Ktq M CCy CEO '.26. _ 'G�sry 6 .� �_ q0ZA Coe CMS Q u.2 T V.p`•q> Yt a'o_'" yC Y.E� Nu 7s ^ETC `= PCa qdL 3 h G.0 a'V nq L>LNw cEO Or 9ZC Lea �Ol^^ LpM y^ ^bC C^ C9•�Qd.p CL Y.MN A lC•� E •-1q » L� �C "emu>q S AY 4 L^Zb•O..G.A>C �Gy>TO ubFr-•�4 UM �c u9 N E u'u°a s- 37 U7 u`a Tan C Yc CGM EUO ^q YY> VL O c y C QqY Yn NUJ Y gm au obi Deena 3 'ova>"�NZ oL n e 5aca ao.L. a v a cLy u� oca.. uY--S yopZZ U <ra nrn Mn �-s Nc ��No rA. au .a . a^.� ��y rnca �.G'a.0 U. o i .�.. 2Z '. it UY.a1L pf. q oa.: of iso O=L GLdv OZ b UL Oy YYN�u > Up� 1` fz ^ SNN q.2 NLO nifa�o.'.0. c ^jT L a Zd L N R O U .�,\. NddC +rN NyOj S.Q QO Ol6m YyGGC C Lbb q'qO iNU L! N Obb y q .•R Oyu Obd+ L• L ata4U9 'u NN^ E LL>� A OI•.w. Y Y�. tly ^"z, N G'O. d A Y 4 2. L Y rt >"LL" 00.�C Y Y� O�b � • Ly AO Y NS y g O i. • L .O„q 6 H>� G 1 q G tU.M� Y O _ �RYN d O N�O'a OY N C u G O V V � GgEN `001 t b '^ �b Y.GpNb�r d iGG L _ hy tea)O N N Y^ d LV G 6.1 w V14 d{O.1 9 O tfa• ^,n ' N Nd w•i P41 W N xI 60 b 'tl nL 9.G Gy c a o R vp Y Efi NNL ObMp L�q aLiS CG Y� Y.�6Mg NtlL.re.L�. u` G,:C O` �N7 L= 62 UC A AY O^ ti O64,C OI tC�Opqq UCCO' �9�� Af„ �� LLa .aYY=� L ,tGNL NOpL Lb y Vn G YxMU Uy�y 9Yy CC�.Y Y ' •wL tiCNu>. GN WPI� Y Yo YOMn^RN b 9 N��1ye CLOTH CC L S L N L. L O Y i N 0~ Y n u•+O '` V L AV '^ G � N Lb d G•4 NW G'O �� y Y b EGG fny O y^x� A GOOF n qy yN Cfgt L G LN d. u Y nyY oN Y u aY�.Y.wic^ n �w0• ^duo m 6G n�a tY aaiONN�ya�ma.k m vG b^ o. �Y L Ned u A G Gf G L N 6 MOOL4900aNU s.6 Og36C. � GYP . 6 L Hy U r ! NLb V A b O UO�•uL•r CNG N �N <M^ <p S N. 1~M S <N Y^�OI 7 Of u N.6 0 •C A�O d a Y t V.O N p N w 0 L •a Y gm, d b .2 L c^O•Of Of c = L a•U u v� a G 6 6 ggOC po� OyN G• �N� N y dl 'N� d Cw 06 C N��y i� Ytl.6 4 RaL`L R w ��q^ (ter NS N O, U6LL G 4 U U-i•.y q�d �q L N N4c =` H C U �u N V O C•� ~.N _ 6 d U b @ Y A^ a 9 9 L Y a d U L < O t 2 2 �N c A V � ..qLd >N 9 b G ' '•b N L O L d 6 L C y d. .-.•. L q Y GEY=O t= u C x LG t'S Ya pb bL "^YN dT�tr v.L aOY a Gm� > m NOOY ^>O.p3 .. �Ud �^4'O � CG bG YwF N�� yY qCr S SOu 6.Gq CM N r d Y L Z G� O:t Ls�i �� Of C�U�OO ayV L � ZY Y N` � TL q•Lir E✓T � n = N ow ^>L ADO+ c1.0 Ey A}C Y Q • O L.r z q V L Y Y.. y y w R C C C ..G. • UA bt Q^ NZ 6v�.� �.R'��b�.L L 6Yrd� Oy.C1 'XiY.• f.p U^ a �p bONtl s01 �� U N 4 b O N N ^0 O � q4• Y O I-ZT2 2uO C wt�' Y b N •+}G pCc:q V V Ue a n Ed LG b nyy �.>Y nN OS 1J �L 51 uZ. G C Y UL •.Y b q0 n pUY=FL <ytn0 <4.frm T <bN 1�6vni <ti <a 1-jw�iN 6OO C <N6w w6 pr NULO. II 40 N 0 3-2S W FW oyu� ca EK r: \- gib% 9r �P�^L1p • O uw 2 Cep C �K ,rM, Y`d dCn W� �O� G m2 ± Q Oq Yd•yY LY I � T- T E u Ems. 00 4 4. 3 N N 'e GN F~• u.,u aca �.yu..;Eu �%Q ofJ Y .n.u. °' �,p�' Yca� � c« '� ma n.` �L t. 2.2 N r •N 00.^ QPn ^L^€€ � y�a L.C. eQ � Od C '^y •P`Y R O P14 L Off= p N L •Wj A�6� sa =� 6 A O. � �`C �Utl YU aE�P tiPA J t LStt 64 Om4 C~ EC: ycp .�.d 4 YON yu.x r0..0•w'aa RUz SLOi.. L TOWa.� •�qEa RC L d+ L L q T RpL r Q dUy A p R Y N r`d Y• R.� Ar. G� ^QL Cp gag. L ' M^R.G d L y 4 P iP.z r M S R.l V y W y T �^ d+� L 41 ab� N'hF u CC€u ' ^o NG �4 N eN C ii W V 4 � O� q n V de•� � 0. N 41N L P� V L: C O d 4•N O < d W 0 w N L V. N � ��V R. L W 9 R OP LO.? �C C T �UW uQmO! Aa. ,c 6VR i OY^; O^6 L C R L G 1 d 0 N H Y p 1-AaR h40.M 314.1'>6 NRN P 456+73�.YJ 4+r- C•-ti.A c a� ��w NQ..Yii s� -F tAi nL+ CuC ct NI`•� 96 aid -•PIL •n d'L 7 q P�Q .x y our L o ~y Rpm i A. v.n .�«• o�y " ~n Yn� N¢=E � � Gd • T^' a _ N.O., � SLyt �• q W T C C M y C.Y }.• y y Y p N Td^= �� N QM Y Q R q Ah Oi. C P• LO«� 2 L O q Q T C L Y a• r A 9 C� ✓� 4 ..- �p Y. ITN C2 C �..•r SRv O' V 3 p�C' OQ OY PQ OL WVOC n Cq N YpN Lr��. U dwT.�. P.P r^-L'� .OR q�E. �M6•- P C� N v c .n y.^.I+ Y 4 a y N •.N y 6 LLL Y Y ! N^� .p �r•Y. }�^ 0.yV•p Ny U N�giE L _Jd Lw+ y 6 qy AA NN Luq y[Li.0 .0 NdM^ oyL„ +N•PgY d� URy ��OL ,O ly.. .,w C C.2 C L pt u 2 G F P T N.Ga TMyu b S LOY Ev y9 ZfL Ndr C�LQ C q O A Y AC P S C N.. L'O O. w.y. ^•y L N� a NNYO V4CP OGm, TC�Y AYE , M �•"a rn A T M Oe✓. „�C ^_ TC C C O VA Yr L:I Ls � LGo•- AQ -+^^L YT•+. .. =6 -. LC6uPi. U O ri 0 n` +nau v�H 2�T .i LE-- � e-R -e •�6a. C.V N• e o. i uoo 400c.bc Naa t c c 4oac `. .. • Y O Y I M L r n 0. i.r ✓ • G E A^ C 6 C� 3f L� s O NOT a -3 Un �bYj.L �p ` eY uGCMa� O� ci 0A y�lV YC O `• n F� `d O O '�N` L LO V 5yyy w O w s - �Q 4 u y C u.�q d u v Y e C V w A. •6 0�Q NNG 96 CY.w u.N. v4 O O O. O > ro ✓'ny.C- ✓Lb Tq 9L 40 4 w G 'Yro4 �G Y e W�. Y'V Y Y � ^ i A N- ✓ 'ryNYI w&AU Z� NN o0o �o�o u�Y�v.TG. u e uS. GN uE c a L4 VL He ✓ @G1r 4 1s_ YN c.i ritt r ui a r. L W .I LO1 Dl. H.PY >� LC Ot Lro ✓ N 'c oc c Lcu a a� bw ¢oc.� �= `o«.wo�- . w �C.;v e "•n cw0 S n .. of ��..w✓ wy� .L,.r.. f- �„ m a xb� .NN a a g CC da .r wi 'a ^ Y�3 Yc2LYc Cro W f S U� Y � 4} ro�qq. �C QCC C y Q LO d= N 9w9 G G Y.fib. L ✓. MN ✓��. �C�9 OYA M.C L^ ✓ LC YC maw Y � Cw '09 ~ YU�� OwYs ��9U .... s ✓.' L� yy Y4✓ L £ C Q f•' y V A a Y p 0 O O Q y A L ppp S. X ✓to C bx 9 O.N. M n w O auwi d6 tN^n wL uo Pu. o CY= Gd YwY+.i• E� ^W VCl6p b0. Vp[ -O 2 0 V U N p p y C^ 6 3 .D v M .w -�6 O ✓V F Y V aC yA C p,rww � ♦.Y � C Y O\ Ow ^Y 4y ny L KO�LC yf}OUN E>n0d «� o��w L �� 4v^ G r•G �' '� ..s. wpnq EnbiOp UN^...G .u.o a°'..." weo. is a6F Pef ro a ^eq. N.o"L .c�..c a✓� c � oAN u�roM ays n o.o YA c A @ OmbNq =L D•V C 1s.b aLl�C dp lt.O W. CYCN. O O3 Yf Y ✓� pN .52 G N LESwY.M 6YYIs NAYO 1 N O ✓ N Y GCY Y. u AYV__ F A N G QnN E^L CE 6 9 V uM_ bG Ow OL L w WNV. WYII '=6 GJ s".O 4RY. 41 U-2 2 a -• .. `a r� MuiL ic' xp r a'.�tLi W; aC L x •• $ �. » qV dO is R fiU EqE OtwR. N w ti li 0`A <y V r 1� 3 aU. �4 wC iYui� Y � O ^ R�� ,aN ■w i - p (•\p``tl p^ r Q V u� �.. Y. N N 9 �~4 �W ^L z �('(�{• LPC4 bL O.W■M W Lti QNK�w �.Y. NYO• i•�. 4. bT� 49 LL/ 44 W�C Vu Y O.pN 4 MO {..� .�.. `� p< O.il.. C Uw II.6t p�•bi fi y� �I abYH `.�. V.A it AVn. E CN y YY y' �OCW. iU•. Y< LO4y.0 �Dw - WN w'pA Dd1 d wV 4 C.O Y CU O q W.yiN 4V Y40 " •ED �p TpfuiaW b. y � N9 � ALV. At OL. �pLY C yiyQ c < LYW;C G Wi Yq Cd .w CDu roNT1 MC o y 4 W G A D E E.L b E W... TN. i 2 �.� a L y ' U <i U^!O CCppi CA,Y D L4 by GT.r A 9 w.S .44 `W q. 3i Y ^rN r u�y'. d,C..C. «Y�r µN WN.:. Va .a pi to y 'ma �`rLd irsr. WG o. cva m p++dL R"t Yo .1.rrL¢'w t L.YL ^ q C R _ � ♦L N -Lu+ pe4.. LtOdrr Nb 4rrW KV '4w W�iqL V1,7 30 VV SYO. q �b �.C., �NV� •i C...vl SN 4 b 4 dN yd d �•4 U O i =q� � N� I D D.t ,` G.. Tr a U pis by L O 4•W a -C 41 LG -0H � @.' � 4 i dMN4w a•D Yg ^.L e R •4u R�� pOx1 ,0�� y.4@ V.w+ L wry i N c Li� b 6 �U � W i vu ubw 3R �� Gp MC�N� "D r3M1 Tyvy 61 xY.R L Y� C NJ cJ bWC CW n�W yC ¢a 6? at 6fi p iK it p.. 4n ay< ai O C6 CC Lyap Y..� yy4 ^V WJ iCw ,dCM � 06 r.Ov dLA �Vy,.i-..v tly '. �•yg _� t i C �b � LA Y 3Y `60C. 8- y� iT•Op�.N 4a O} d tqDA C a.l E.yys N4 Y1 L4 2 u .i CC DA NQC <- .>q Vyq k 4 e ty'N yCi Y �p , ¢^�J+ < ..` A d a jb L O C 4 Sr i .~ Ed j� YaN eM i Vy vL AW a J 6 iMy K V•4 W.< r u R� K L 3 41 v�u t t v� ��. n i C °i w� a»u IWn aw 9�pW �4 D� N�(Ij fi I tp� o Ml z 4J V � I d h cwo � �F3 a - �^iu.d c. •I c'4- � `.°-'c .'. Y Y � pia N. �.sr °�.'� "y - uy `na`N yrrb iO p i d�u rn36 ray« no A v n3 ^ uYL YL 41 un vY oa L « �. 'ca ay sa V�YN YLL�01 L 3�Y � CY �Y •.• > w4f� � �Y yN� aYyN 'O �Yx C '00 Y9 YV ti Go VN 'a'aY+v pp pt U y q u pb CMS= L63p `Y »�L6 Cw N 6L 2� L•d 1'� �MLY. YVL C r F�Nu jr� <W G4i SO4 NNa7V0 F 4_ i 0!29 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF RUPORT z t 0 r 0 0 ,z UR >' DATE: September 24, 1986 r r TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Dan Coleman, Senior Pranner SUBJECT: TERRA VISTA CUL-DE-SAC FENCING LEWIS HOMES •• Proposed changes to fence treatments at the ends o sicTe-on cul-de- sass. I. BACKGROUND: In response to concerns raised by homeowners and would ee� home owners within Terra Vista regarding the safety and privacy of side-on cul-de-sac, Lewis Homes has proposed revisions to the fencing treatments previously approved by the Planning Commission. Specifically, Lewis Homes is requesting approval to modify the fencing treatment at Sundance Drive, Cascade Court, Bellpine Place, Springfield Rrive, nnd. Essex Place. However, the proposed desnn revisions would be prototypical for use throughout Terra Vista. At the reouest of staff, Lewis Homes solicited the input of residents regarding the proposed revisions. A second letter has been submitted by Lewis Homes regarding this meeting. II. ANALYSIS• A. General: 170o of the first four subdivisicns at Terra Vista were (Te—signei with cul-de-sac siding on to P,,i a Line Road to craate opportunities for visual openings ;ird prevent the development of a continuous solid wall 1 W! along Base Line Road. These openings were fenced with a continuous wrought- iron fencing which maintains the physical privacy and security normally associated with a cul-de-sac neighborhood. ' i In keeping with the goal of creating a strong pedestrian oriented Planned Community, Lewis Homes advanced this concept. Side-on cul-de-sacs to major interior streets and the trail system were designed to provide convenient pedestrian connections throughout the project. B. Perimeter Streets: Lewis Homes priposes that cul-de-sacs which side onto erra Vista's perimeter streets and to Milliken Avenue withie Terra Vista, be cont3::uously fenced with wrought- iron fencing so that no pedestrian access will be provided (see Exhibit "A"). This design concept exists on the two side-on cul-do-sacs immediately west of Deer Creek Channel, Ambrosia Road and Meadowlark Place. The advantage of this concept is that it maintains Vista's into and out of the residential I ITEM C I ' . PLANNING MOUSSION STAFF REPORT TERRA VISIT( CUL-DE-Sh.0 FENCING September 24, 1986 Page 2 tracts, maintains security and prr ?en+;s a continuous solid wall appearance along Ba!:7 Line Road. The disadvantage is that it ' precludes pedestrUn access and would require pedestrians to take more a circu.tou! Aute to schools, the Rancho Cucamonga Central Park and transit fact ities. T;`;, Terra Vista Conmiunity Plan states that "in side-on or front-on cunditions- the need for fences or walls will be evaluated case-by-case under the development review process", L. Interior Streets: Within Terra Vista where cui-de-sacs abut k. Terra _ sta s interior streets, Lewis Hanes proposes that wrouyh`c-iron fetcirg be provided in a manner that permit-. pedestrian connections yot minimizes the likelihood of children cE:asing a bail onto an interior street (e.g., Spruce), The advantage of this design is that it maintains the oper. feeling at the end of the cul-de-sac, provides greater security and safety for children, maintains pedestrian access, and precludes motorcyclists and off-road recreation vehicles from Jumping the t curb and taking a short cut. This eontroiled pedest•ian access ' is illustrated in the attached Exhibit"C". The residents that } met with Lewis Homes oppose this optioh and prefer ro pedestrian access be allotted as shown in Exhibit "E". 0. Greenway and Trait System: Whore cul-de-sacs abut `Terra is a s major greenway and •trail system, Lewis Homes is proposing that they remain open as presently designed throughout the community. The open access to be provided from cul-de-sacs abutting the trail system and greenway would be similar to that shown in Exhibit "D". The three cxc,ptions proposed to this would be Essex Place whict abuts the trail along Terra Vista Parkway, and Cardiff Place and Devonshire Court which will abut the major greerrsay system aijacent to Elm Avenue. In these three instances, Lewis tunes would propose that these be treated the same as cul-de-sacs abutting Terra Vista's interior streets and provide controlled pedestrian access. This is consistent with the Terra Vista Community Plan which states: "If fencing is desired, it should preferably be open or part ally open to permit viewing of the gretnway." III. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE: The Committee has reviewed the proposed changes and reconnen ed that controlled access be provided on perimeter and interior streets and that open access be maintained along the greenway and trail systeh. They further reiterated the goat of the Community Plan to provide a pedestrian oriented community. C" , PLANNING CO*11S*SI6 STAFF REPORT TERRA Yi:TA 4U�•DE.5AX FENCING f September.'Z4, 1906 Page 3 1` IV- RECOMME;SDATIO Staff recommends that the Planning "amnission approve cont4 led access for perimeter and Interior streets and that opt: access be maintained along the greenway and trail system ny minute action. Re ally *te /Or ulle City Plan er.' DC:ko Attachments: Letter from Lewis Homes ` Exhibit "A" - "No Access",- Alternative Exhibit IV - "Open Access" Existing Exhibit "C" - "Controlled Access" - F.1ternative Exhibit "D" "Open Access" - Existing 4_ Exhibit "E" - "No Access" - Sundance Driv6 Alternative 1 i I I 4 M TERM VISTA ti�1CWY r 1 RECCIVED ._ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMJNMI, September 10, 1986 PLANNING DIVISION All S EP 111988 Planning Division '718�9�1Uil;ij�(jJ�J�i4loris City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Base Line Raid Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Mr. Brad Buller, C,;:ty Plattner 4` RE: Cd.-de-sae Fencing, Terra Vista Dear Brad: As you know, two of our first four subdivisions at Tierra Vista were designed with cul ie-sacs siding on to Bay-- Line Road.. These cul-de-sacs were provided in order to create opptl, tunl ties for visual openings froin base Line Road, to pre{;ent . *he development of a continuous, solidly-�a?led appearance' on Base Line Road and to create occasional vistas into the' abutting residential areas. These openings were fenmed with wr6ught iron fencing in order to mantain the physical pri, _cy anel security which normally characterize cul-de- sacs. !. When we subsequently developed landscape design standards for Terra Vista's perimeter, streets and its major interior streets, we, in conjunction with our landscape architect and city staff members, advanced the concept that such cul-de-sacs remain open, to further the convenieni pedestrian orientation which the Terra Vista Community Plan seeks to enable As we have brot'ght some of these cul-de-sacs on line, however, we have e;count .d problems which ;lone of those of-us who were privy to the design process. contemplated, and which require some remedial action. Basically, homeowners ar-1 would-be homeowners who h ve purchased or wish to purchase home. on these streets have raised legitimate cotcerns about safet , and privacy issues. Specifically, we have in hand the following: (1) A customer servicF, request from Reid C.. DuLac, 10875 Sundance Drive, a Copy of which is attached; (2) A petition signed by 17 residents of E ndance Drive and nearby streets, a copy of which is attached. 1156 N.Mountain Ave. PO.Box 670 Opland,CA 91786 (714)965.0971 DL=, d by Lewis Homes I. f i I• f Mr. Brad Buler September 10, 1986 Page I( (3) A copy 0.- a letter to the membe s of the City Council, signed by 17 residents of Cascade Court and nearby streets. We think that these documents, while not necessarily correct in all their particulars, do eloquently set forth the feelings of the residents and adequately demonstrate the need for some changes in the currently approved cul-de-sac enclosure concepts. Accordingly, we wish to propose for consideration andapproval by the Design Review following steps; Committee and the Planning Commission the (1) Cul-de-sacs ohict side on to Terra Vista's perimeter streets, and to Milliken Avenue within Terra Vista, will be continuously fenced, so that no pedestrian connections will exist. In additinn to the existing cul-de-sacs which abut Base Line Roar, west of Deer Creek Channel, currently planned or cos.utructed cul-de-sacs wh,'ch will be completed in this manner include Cascade Court and Belpine Place, both of which abut Base Line Road in Tract No. 12670, and an as yet unnamed street which will abut Milliken Avenue in Tract No. 12671. (2) Wl :in Terra Vista, where cul-de-sacs abut Terra Vista's i:inerior streets, fencing will be provided and configured in such P a y as to permit pedestrian circulation, while a , f 3 same time inimizing the likelihood of children da zing out of t`ie cul-de-sacs into the busier adjacent streets in pursuit of game ' .ls and the like, and to precluJe vehicular traffic, such as that which is prescnUy occurring at Sundance Drive, where bicyclists, motorcyclists, and operators of three-wheel, off-road recreational vehicles preseptly jump the curbs between Sp.,uce and Sundance Drive, traverse the landscaped area, and aistv.rb the serenity and ,•..atety of the cul-de-rac residents. 7h s approach wi'.1 i used at all such cul-de-sacs within the planned wt,>�ity, including 11 locations marked on the enclosed map �,s "controlled" pedestrian access. (3) -de-sacs which abut Terra Vista's tiai system and gevenway will be left open, as present! designe tt: oughout the community. The :Locations or nine imch cul-de-sacj are shown on the enclosed map, I am also enclosing copies of our landsaar.�:= archit.+ct's design studies for the necessary —difications at Cas.oade Court, Belpine Place, Springfield Drive, and Essex Place. These drawings, all of wh: .h are street-specific, haould be regarded as prototypical r n i, 70 JI - z Mr. Brad Buller September 10, 1986 '' Page desi-,IS for the no-access locations in the case of the former two, and controlled access locations in the case of the latter two. W will apprecte very much your assistance iii scheduling this a matter for the earliest possible action by those bodies which must review it. Please contact me if you nave any ques' ons, or if further information of any sort is necessary, Cordially, LEWIS RomES *bh,�R. Melcher Vice President, Project ?development z JRM:jea:dly7052 Enclosures cc: Jeffrey King, Esq., Mayor Mr. Richard Dahl, Mayor Protim Mr. Charles J. Buquet, II, Council McMber Mr. John D. Mikels, Council N Ter. Mrs. Pamela J. Wright, Councl flomQor Mr. Lauren M. Wasserman, City :v,'arK.ger Mr. Jack Lam, Director of Comannity Development I I I (2-6 R ECE1 VED-.. September 18, 1986 C17Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISloN AM SEP Planning Division �1�31�IIBIUd !City of Rancho Cucamonga l tti t",4(516 9320 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 2730 Attn: Mr. Brad Buller, City Planner RE: Cul-de-sac Fencing, Terra Vista--Additional Background Information Dear Brad: On receipt of my letter of September 10, 1986, Dan Coleman of your division requested that I supplement the materials submitted therewith to include a design specific to the Sundance Drive cul-de-sac at Spruce Avenue, and to suggest that we solicit the support of the residents of the affected streets for this proposal. Pursuant to Can's request, I commissioned such a study of the Sundance Drive ci±l `:?-sac, and I hate :attached hereto copies of that study, which illustrates the aPPl•isation of our so-called "controlled" pedestrian access design to that particular street location. I then convened a meeting of the residents of the streets in question. The meeting was held at our office on Tuesday, September 16, and was attended by ten residents, representing nine street addresbes--eight pn Sundar,ce Drive, and one on Cascade Court. At the meeting, I care,,ully explained the Terra Vista plan to those in attendance with special attention to, and emphasis on, the pedestrian orientation that the plan seeks to achieve. I then explained the 'importance of pedestrian access at these cul-de-sacs, and advanced that as the reason for the so-called "controlled" pedestrian design. The response of ::he homeowners present was instantaneous, - unanimous, and emphatic--they are not interested in pedestrian access. They feel that pedestrian access is contradictory to the purpose of the cul-de-sac, that pedestrians can easily talk to nearby through streets for access, that the exposure to the high traffic volumes on Spruce Avenue is undesirable, that the use of their cul-de-sac street for short-cut purposes is detrimental to the neighborhood. A number of the residents are involved in various kinds of law enforcement work, and they cite the open design as ideal for bt%glary and other criminal types. They are extremely concerned about their privacy and the safety of their children. Because of this response, I have caused to be prepared an alternate design for this cul-de-sac, which may be appropriate to apply not only here, but also at Other situations where cul-de-sacs side on to through streets. This alternate design provides for a continuous fence, thereby protecting the goals of visual E 1156 N.Mountain Ave. P.O.Box 670 Upland,GA 9178E (714)985.0971 { ' Developed by Lewis Homes (2 9 F Mr. Brad. Buller, City Planner September 18, 1986 Page 2 access and' streetscape vt.iety for the through streets, while delivering the privacy that the residents so strongly desire. 'this design is also attached to this letter for your information, ` I will be prasent at this everting's Design Review Committee meeting to discu;� this material with the committee members, and I am mosthopeful that we can arrive at a recommendation to the Planning Commission which will satisfy the needs of all parties. t Sincerely, LEWIS HOMES OVIce nRMelcher President, Project Development JRM:jea•Fnc. cc: Jeffrey King, Esq., Mayor Mr. Richard Dahl, Mayor Protem Mr. Charles J, Buquet II, Council " 'iber Mr. John D. Mikels, Council Member , Mrs. Pamela J. Wright, Council Member Mr. Lauren M. Wasserman, City Manager Mr. Jack Lam, Director of Community Development i I' i i 311NiAV N?14YlIM US Vol I'D Q �R W WHO to '�< a ate. W Q GD flc og: < <+x: � n0 cc fQyj a 0F be a z2 I a ca t •+a t/ x 1 0 �am i� �.� tip � �w##�(.; UHn a � �'J'#�•'� ww t�. 1919 mpq ago Siq XOR 19 sn«am a nny�t c� Cv « Sh CC q sRf o � twsfjfr r 'ti o .�. `"�dwq ! ��M—�•°,s �• .so 3 Ax Poi r"+:,�'o.��: i� '...�`.}�.� s P e';fie � � g• 't..•�.,. yz °•,a"'. ; `«` `� �rrR� ��. y�•3,�� fftR�` �: EP.l... � : ;°� 'ff$ '`w 1 �,,,, ' ffi-f� '°^>.,f�"sv�d°- � w�� tq�k ..�-•«'�� wSlw'". ."+• jf;es,'` f�;A4r +�5 °d •• f f t ► �� 3 y ttpa �QE 100 zmx WAAVV xwmv N"VO i C .9 June 2n, l9eG To City of Zancho " gamongx, As new residents of ;hoar city we are requesting your help. �e •te are unhappy with the open end on Our�cul de sac. Yte purchased these Lots because ue felt there would be more privacy and safety for our chUdren an these lots. :.e have auked Lewis Homes to close the lots with wrought iron as are the cul de sac lots north of Baseline. Lewis has agreed i to do this if the City grants permission. Please accomo ate us with your approval for this request. c"56 I S' blQ 5 1rtCr4-- K. Cf l t,, emu(; �try 1";a— �. �p`vS`� t t vc�ihJCE u�. a 1 �i•` "' :r J ,% 1. r /C � , <.t try f y e a 9, 6' ce C "' -L`�.l;r�,� !�J�/C,ja J!'�-S 7r{/_"'•'Cl=- /LV//iY `�� ..:. ` i G >lc �c� t1r%� /(lfA. j�CT Cc&-Oc- �ic4a,� LEWIS HOMES REQUEST FOR SERVICE FORM TRACT .rTENTLON; LOT _ 30 LEWIS HOMES CUSTOMER SERVICE NAME Reifl C . Th,Tan P. 0. BOX 670 UPLAND, CA 91786 ADDRESS InA!Z5 „nAanr Tlri .e I NOTE: FOR SERVICE ON APPLIANCES, EAU- i3as� 0.).in AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM, ELECTRICAL SYSTEM, PLUMBING SYSTEM, REFER TO THE HOME PHONE (2 10S91152853 INFORMATION IN 'tiOh�.-OWNER'S KIT. GUSINESS PHONE PLEASE DETAIL BELOW THE ITEMS IN NEED OF SERVICE. (for office only) ITEM Sub. or Date I Data NO. DESCRIPTION: (please print firmly) Craft Assigited Completed bw * /e�J S P nimber of small rhildren in cu disac s'd s s d n .% Snriga en2los i }o n'revtan+ nhi dr-n from wandering ^+ this. wR.s in the -a1ans at. this 1o"a bg the Psilien+s in +hP arPa.hut of a >• _+ n da.13gt-r to our children is Somewhat u;)settinar- vniir consl(l Pra±j nn Pind honef 1 k7ould ft sn 1 IF NOT AT HOME, A LEWIS HOMES REPRESENTATIVE MAY OR MAY NOT X ENTER THE ABOVE PROPERTY TO MAKE NECESSARY CORRECTIONS. OWNER'S SIGNATURE DATE '(White 6 yellow copies go to-customer service -- -- - Pink copy is buyer's copy) C`I/ CS-OS x +I !t' BASE LINE ROAD I P; TURF WROUGHT IRON FENCE CONCRETE SIDEWALK BLOCK WALL / SHRUB MASS W/GROUN Vf CASCADE COURT j TR 12670-1 ` l get4 r 15 PLA(u PROPOSED PLAN u ACCESS = L_ 0 CITY Or ITE`I: RANCHO CUCANI0.NGA. TITLE: PLANNING DIVIS10Y F_XHIBIT- ,_.SCALE f h RASE LINE ROAD TURF • __ - CONCRETE SIDEWALK SHRUB MASS WIGROUNDCOV BLOCK WALL- CASCADE COURT TR 12670-1 wmf(P5 P l"P-IU70 APPROVED PLAN i OPENi i i NORTH CITY OF IT EX I: RANCHO CUCA.1'10.,GA TITLE: MANNING DIVISI YN EXHIBIT:_=sCALC:____��.__�_ SPRINGFIELD DRIVE YR 12319-H / r WROUGHT IRON FENCE SHRUB BRASS W/GROUNDCOVE �r BLOCK WALL CONCM- E T SlgEWALK - --- TURF FL TERRA VISTA PARKWAY .� PROPOSED PLAN PEDESTRIAN ' ACCESS CITY , Rt�� Or � 7 T ITElI: 1 CHO �.,�.,CAMOt,Cr-k TITLE: PL{INNING DIVISIC),N EXEIIBIT:_.��SCALE: f . l F r SPRINGFIELD DRIVE TR 12319-8 E55�C P 7RIZ319-c- SHRUB MASS W/GROU►IDCOVEF BLOCK WALL CONCRETE SIDEWALK TURF. TERRA VISTA PARKWAY - APPROVED PLAN I OPEN CITY OI' ITEM: RAINCHO CUCATTVIONGA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISION ExHIRiT SCALE: C �J� SUNDANCE: DRIVE 1 TR 1231,9-4 t WROUGHT IRON FENCE BLOCK WALL-- SHRUB MASS W/GROUNDCOVER ! CONCRETE SIDEWALK -TURF SPRUCE AVENUE APPROVED PLAN SUNDANCE DRIVE TR 12319-4 I WROUGHT IRON FENCE BLOCK WALL- \ ( SHRUB MASS W/GROUNDCOVER `� y r CONCRETE SIDEWALK-- - _ TURF SPRUCE AVENUE PROPOSED PLAN - SUNDANCE DRIVE TR 12319-4 i i WROUGHT IRON FENCE BLOCK WALL-- SHRUB MASS W/GROUNDCOVER- CONCRETE SIDEWALK TURF SPRUCE AVENUE ALTERNATE PROPOSED PLA1 �? -/ W/ N CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA e�CA STAFF REP'JRT01 r U Y DATE: September 24, 1986 inn TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission: FROM: Barrye R, Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Joe Stofa, Jr., Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 9973-Kensle - A r suua'vision of 13.71 acres of landinto 3 parcels in the General Industrial designation (subarea 11), located on the nortgwest corner of 6th Street and Buffalo Avenue (APN: 229-262-28) I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Re uestec-i Approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map as shown on Exhjibit 911 B. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 6.99 Acres Parcel 2 - 4.06 Acres Parcel 3 2.72 Acres C. Existing Zoning: General Industrial (Subarea 11) D. Surre4nding Land Use. North - Warehouse/Distribution building Soutt'. - Vacant East - Vacant West - General Industrial E. Surrounding General Plan and Development Code Designations. North - General Industrial (Subarea 11), General Industrial/Rail Served South - General Industrial (Subarea 11) East - General Industrial (Subarea 11) I West - General Industrial (Subarea 11) ITEM 0 r . T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment and Tentative Parcel Map 9973-Kensley DATE: September 24, 198.6 Page 2 F. Site Characteristics: The'site is vacant with a slope of approximately 2% to the ' south. ANAL CIS: '. The purpose of this parcel map is to create separate- parcels for the 3 buildings approved by the Planning Commissionigs CUP 86-06 on June 11, 1986. The relationship of the parcel lines to t;ie approved project site plan is shown oil Exhibit "C". The public streets adjacent to the site are improved with the exception of sidewalks, scree. lights, drive approaches and landscaping xhich are required upor. development on a parcel by, parcel basis. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Study. Staff conducted afield investigation and completed Part II of the Initial Study. No adverse impacts upon the environment r:re anticipated as a result of this project. Therefore, issuance of Negative Declaration is ;appropriate. IV. C kRESPONDENCE. Notices of Public Hearing have been iRint-- o surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily %'eport- Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input and elements of the Tentative Parcel Map. If after such consideration, the Commission can recommend approval, then the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Respectfully �submittei, s�L?/trfcK.(G�IlXMI-11// - Barrye R. Hanson Senior Civil Engineer BRH:JS:me Attachments: Vicinity Map (Exhibit "A") Tentative Map (Exhibit "B") Resolution and Recommended Conditions of Approval 1 k f FOOT N f LL tU W A RRO+r! Awy. Z -------------- {! u , 4 6 1 � 1 o m A.T.4.T.F. R R. G BTtt 5Z: flAYYod AV IIUFFALO j ' N a 51TE r III CIrIT OF �: RCEL, MAr 1173 RANCHO CUCAMONG.4,' T '1'LE:_V 1 C 1 NlIY MAP k ENGINEERING lYfVISSION Xi�BIT:_ A " l .� —•?Lw. � '�'� .S' �+k,.y:�Y't��Pf.�GYi 4 Tit •^ ^_ .i.." �.�. - ---- i:.,�_ � 1 � � � � �Z�hTeverL�rY*'tse"3.rai.'•��}: :�'�;•�%r. 411. .¢ vk 7' „�,r` j (TENTATIVE) f r' -_ :.-' PARCEL.. MAP NOS. 9�p r CITY OF YUM PIRG-.L.M P9. RANCHO CUCAMOij t�A' ALE: ENGINEEMG DIVISION SIT " d a �f t0 !r� ESLV D. QsP > ' , RRR.av�O I� d 41 h 41 -0 cv w Cl� a AT. S.F, P. 8 T14 M. OAYToeI C- AN tl FFAL.O LU Iti N SITL 13 Y. OF d1 : PARCEL. M.A,r RAI C Q CUCA7ViClN , TITU: N�L1lCLN tTY MAP J, i:lJ.Y l7.u`I,Ca+:tilJ.l G DI Y.-SIO - ExunB- ',•_. `c A /9 l { / 41 It 1 i� •----- , t ,-;rr aer �N�-i.7`cc�f7.`rc=T%`N,l�✓='_Cv i2 •sw. t % Y� r�I fr "^_ 4A '�r�'•-' PARCE!rrNTATn�7 • icy�L;l.._�_�a � L93C'- ki .a �.TNLiMI�''- •• •.is N.s MAP NO. 99 - V CITY j 0F 7rBt._ BRCR p 9W� RANCHO CUCAm-ONGA- ,Us lqw EN'GMEMING DIVISION EXH lT-.-.�, r �i ar co KIM Ell 3 t y j-ie� •� \ fl �' NF wro w y OCO o <i. iT. VCNI A. S m sa F �q1 0 1 wIFT • 0 M W z l RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY- APPROVING' TENTATIVE PARCEL'MAP NUMBER 9973 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number '9973, submitted by Kensl;ey Lirporation, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 3par6di', -the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of san rni Bernardino, State of Califoa, t entified as APN(s) 229-262-28, located ion .;' the northwest corner of 6th Street and Buffalo Avenue; and WHEREAS, on September 24, 19$6, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above-described map. ` NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING. COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan, 2. That the impra-:ement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environiomta2 <amage, public health problems or ',,uive adverse -affects on abatting property. SECTION 2: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 9973 is hereby approved- subject tote attached Standard Conditions: t i r; ^ APPROVED AND ADOPTED Ti",IS 241H DAY OF S�,PTEMBER, 1986 PLANNING COMMPSSIOR OF THE;.CITY OF RAN;NO Cif Af10NCA BY: Dennis L. stout, Chiiirman ATTEST: Brad u er^, eputy'., cre ary �F I, Brad Boller, Deputy 5ecratary of the Planning Commission of.the City of Rancho Cucamonga,-,do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by ,the;, Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning COmmission<held on the 24th day of September, .1986, by the following vote-to-wit: ri AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: wx { a C. 0+. I � �W �9i b0 U.rJ YQL b•r • ONI, ti eO La q��, ]nb¢ o u z r c Ey U� ' 1[ .+ ov aMy a N4 _rw Y y • " yy� o.Ea Y :YL AT QyN �Q. � s Co 1. q 000. 56 a s v o i v L a E CC tr.. E 19 e a tim U • =VY 7 �N 4 ^ V LL COJI LL.s b p.� I C E b b W L_1 11 b E GU C GCI QO� qQ,q L` g ~ �d.'C O.W 4 u Y=E VIU� m W`.O i >.4. � L cp+• b...p,w V+. OL.J Yl LI VINY> Ja.p 4� KM xzo �n � 'y w uci LU •p, �v L = o. � waT 21Y CyN 4p0..A Eon_ _ C L U b tV "OD .OL W J ♦+ w gc l 6 L C O• w.� G O Y C= b _ Z C I.Li A� C p K _ 2M x G� .L. H�Nj u CC N Zt I GyG.P �. )'• u 6 HV b O C y u N a.0 `C EVY M QUeb Vy U =^ L 6C! � L , Y O ✓ a q^ L Lb LM wqq LN N h V = pG o + d u� q~ M 49Y oiL C N II G.n Q3 '^ C V S GIG Q 1 C LO Gubt C' a p2 Hb2 < VN C•A CULq .La4 W:V O Y.Ow HbV U N t4 XI I•� I N �p L L aa 1_. gg • v�q .Cqp a W M A µ _t a^ y Lam. VYq OOQ 4^L Nq N�V Ly .•�. qd d �O!4 A V w• �^ OeN iLt d^� 'C� Yd Cc N4L C•.•.a >Y.3 SC1 ! V � .. Y •O Lgg LN dui, �L 90 i ^' i.i Y _ QYp ELS A3 Y` V6 O d ^'.z N a L V V d d N q Y o a. JL 1 Nu Y YW dpY q�.0 .Piro qC Yd E.� C �Y_. •� qa 6q ..., U �O� L ao oy cu c� EC cox' �Y= d°s.ucS n.'n ,vY C 9a 6u •C .y ti� � Cpq..gC. �p'djV Y000 q ..0 �a ^Y . OqL 1rq Y� u� 6dlt dNAb » W qq 6 qY.• m Z €Z tlss N d Odv O it .I 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIVIONGA CVCnnt� STAFF REPORT °. o 0 U 7 DA3E: September 24, oG 077 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission ' FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84-31 - AMENDMENT - DIVERSIFIED The request to amend the approve site plan for Phase II development of an app Hived sho�Rin%i center (Haven Village) on '3.45 acres of land in a` Neighborhood Commercial District, located at the northeas4,.corner of Haven Avenue and Highland Avenue - APH 207-271-5'0 ;. . PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: i. A. Action.Re used: Approval of Phrase III Conceptual site plan. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: ort ing a amT y residential; Law Residential District w' - (2-4 du/ac). South - Vacant; Low Residential District (2-4 du/ac). East - Apartments under construction; Medium-High Residential District (14-24 du/ac). West - Vacant, apartments, service station; Medium Residential District (8-14 du/ac), Neighborhood Commercial District. C. General Plan Designations: Project 5i ems- Neighborhood Commercial. North - Low Density Residential. South - Low Density Residential. East - Medium-High Density Residential. West Medium Density Residential, Neighborhood Commercial. D. Site Characteristics; The site is vacant and is Phase III of l the Haven Village S opping Center as shown in Exhibit "A". I Presently, Phases 1 and II; which is Lucky's Market, ret,11 buildings 1 and 2 and the Payless Drugstore are un&�- construction. South of the project site is the future interchange of the proposed Foothill Freeway. __J ITEM E 1v PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF 1tEPOPT CUP 86-31 - AMENDMENT m DIVERSIFIED September 24, 1986 Page 2 E II. ANALYSIS: A. General: Based on the newest design of the proposed Foothill l`rdeway right-of-way from CalTrans, the lot area for Phase III site plan has been reduced from 3.45 acres to 1.7 acres. j Therefore, the developer has redesigned the phase III site plan �t in order to integrate it to the overall design of the shopping center. The new site plan shows only one Retail #3 building pad area loca*ed immediately adjacent to Payless Store. the remainder of thr site is designed for parking and landscape r areas. Since th6 developer .has no development proposal at this time for Retail #3, it tdsuid be subject to a separate Development Review. Also, the developer intends to complete the entire parkinB,6nd landscape areas of the Phase III: site plan along with Phases I and II development, except for Retail Building #3: ' B. Design Review Ctlin .tee: The Design Review Committee has revieweda pro !!T-anW recommended approval subject to the following conditions,which the developer agreed to: 1. The proposed Retail Building #3 and areas around it would be subject to further review and modificatia; as new development plans are submitted for review. 2. Phase III development, including parking and landsca'pino but excepting Retail Building #3, should be improved along with the Payless project. 3. To alleviate potential traffic conflict, the driveway access and a "T" intersection on Highland Avenue 'shall be redesigned to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4. A 10-foot wide landscape planter should be provided along both sides of the entire length of the temporary access.�a ;,ighland Avenue, C. Environmental Assessment: Staff has completed the Environmental Checklist and tounano significant adverse environmental impacts as a result of this project. Further, a Negative Declaration has been issued for the previously approved Conditional Use Permit for this shopping center on April 24, 1985, III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the General Plan, the o dec Ives o e evelopment Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposed use, and the site plan together with the conditions applicable thereto will not be detrimental to the PLANNING COMMISSTQH STAFF REPORT CUP 86-31 - AMENDMENT - DIVERSIFIED September 24, 1986 Page 3' I public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to )roperties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed use and the site plae` together with the recommended Conditions of Approval are in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and City _ Standards. IV. CORRESPONDENCE This item has been advertised in The Daily Report newspaper as a public hearing aid notices were sent o�alT�}roperty owners within 300 reet of the su t site. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends 'that the Planning Commission Approve e an!,3ndmP--nTTo the Conditional Use brmit 84-31. R full Itt City Planner BB:NF:ko Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Approved Detail Site Plan Exhibit "B" - Amended Site Plan for Phase III Exhibit "C" - Amended Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "D" - Approved Conceptual Grading Plan Resolution of Approval i g / 'And aAVf o M-Y s�t 11 fit U > I Y r 1 1 r j a �• i 1 R E 1 ntidanY MVIt��t IR I MI 06 + 1 + i I Oa i• f1 "-�: a to �}�} -• a�: .+ � ��' nppv 1► tlffR 1� C�sT ..� /1l� S� J� s IN ,t _ kip mill MIR�l Z-:195m Rw Rill In Ng a _ w • H ' ,� atl`\1' ' . ate, ■ K 4 i a RESOLUTION NO. ' A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO +CUCAMONGA, PLANNING COMMISSION APPRIPING AN AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 84- 31 FOR A NEIGHBORHOOD SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER.. OF HAVEN AVENUE AND HIGHLAND AVENUE IN THE NEIGHDORHDO� COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 29th day of August, 1986, a complete application was filed by Diversified Properties Co. for review of the above-descriued project; and WHERE`,S, on the 24th day of September, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public he4ring to consider the above-desyribed project. follows NOW, THEREFORE:, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as SECTION l: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed amendment to the Pnase III site 5 plan is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed use and site plan, together wif•h the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the pubTac health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity, 3. That the proposed amendment to P;ase ?II site plan complies with each of the applizable provisions of the Development Ccde. - SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and t at a Negative Declaration has been issued for the Master Planned Neighborhood shopping center on September 24, 1986. SECTION 3: That the Amendment to Conditional Use Permit No. 84-31 is approie-d—s-ugje-c-t to the following conditions: Planning Division: 1. All pertinent conditions contained within Resolution 85,5'; shall apply. 2. That approval of the proposed Retail Building #3 is conceptual only and re-application for Development/Design Review shall be required. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 84-31 - AMENDMENT DIVEPSIFIED September 24,E 106 Page 2 t 3. Future building layouts and design shall be consistent with the approved architectural style. -� 4. Future Retail #3 building pad shall be temporarily seeded and irrigated for aesthetics and erosion control. 2 5, Phase III development, including parking and landscaping, but excepting for the proposed Retail Building #3, shall oe imprzved and completed along with the Phase II (Payless project) and prior to the release of occupancy for the Payless project. 6, A 10-foot wide landscape area (trees, shrubs, and groundcover) shall be provided along both sides of the entire length of the temporary access to Krghiand Avenue. Detailed lanuscar � irrigation plats shall be submitted to the Planning Division ' 'review. A letter of ` authorization from Cal Trans shall be, ,pitted to the Planning . Division prior to approval of the detailea. ,nndscape plans. 7. Dense landscaping such as increased number of trees and specimen size trees 'shall be provided alr•;,y the entire length of the southern property boundary. ` 8. The southwest corner within the Phase III site pl,,n shall be irrigated and landscaped (trees, shrubs, and groundcover) for erosion and aesthetic control. 9. Any fencing proposed along the southern property boundary shall be subject to Design Review Committee review and approval prior to installation of any fencing materials. Engineering Division: 1. The temporary driveway access from Highland ..venue shall be constructed to include a right-turn aeceleratiun lane for west-bound traffic and a separate left-turn lar— for east-bound traffic to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. All construction and striping shall be completed prior to the release of occupancy for any buildings within the shopping center. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Brad VITA r�, epu y secretary -9 PLANNING COMMIS AN 'SaUTION N0. CUP 84-3i - AMADMENfi DI.VERSIFIEU September 24, 1986 Page 3 I, Brad Buller,' rjeputy Sepfretary of the Planning Ccmmissian of he City of Rancho Cucamonga, do herby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by •dye Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission.-held on the 24th day of September, 1986, by the fallowing vote-to-wit: kX AYES:. COMMISSIONERS: r HOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: of vv grii Yu � cco�. •`A �� •e C a m d L {.i^nG.l.,dnQ ui ya.dvi • 9L> U ��.N O. "C^Iw« q Ada dr U«M. ►L.r. '^'6. gL1fu +Y'�u w`� Q 41Y�b NLup A4 T4 _^-- ..Ia V b ^ L m b y;« ti r. ' W Y Q W y.'tl N C,d.yY`4.N 4.a�a Q 4 H U Q Q♦' Y �d Y w l'�C'q O C O R1 ♦ ff.L «d q L 4 iw Yrti !!,,11 u. tQ�aO VU�gY NQCS r .•.+LL OtCu = S U OLYCY Cw b6d Ab3u YNQVM G.LC ti �T UYv O.d�f V.wY. N^ - ••_a �sd u y..b. .�=na° '^,•C„ }�f,a a.+ 3 Y E gAg C � Ri x• (.3 bq w . g �VQ 4C- Y�Y ff.b 2�Q'O wwA Y GL wq `fr .G.sa.Y LN �EZO« Y Ll. zb... L"AioCia RC6 Y A ,4-.+nn rYd y.N- o.L.n �o'o quq '!2VUsv✓`,..Aa,aac "a �a�Qp w•Nyw`:b: aQM 5cA., Q OUL wtlI M N y ♦� 66A'y�YnU�AU adwUm Rpm Qpy�G.� N N MGhrq� CQt.q AL„ui� RCS QC�FM 4 .Q.q~0.Q NY CY •..ApY•�+T -H'itY C40 9�LpC • �61 iQ.N $OyT A�gae�LO USA•• 904Y.0 rL' OAgb�y �••�= n=aY g� Yy i. N.a..i Oyyc as o>'E nn� CY, �°� Lc�¢ r{•L vg �6i y„O+a1L ,u Q4 nxYfrg$. w1.� 1YS rVgy MM � NY�'t.V iL .Q.pdud 4'e wuac 66' uti� YfA ::�F.aSXu«a.wnarn Lam • iA 1 JY b]CYE C Nr� N Nr�C Y QL, Lt^gippU J. tN diib t+ y 4d b4 fO.'•• !. NN'�•!tiA �rd�Lr t G..• @ U� N f.QC� rYN GL 44.6� �r CQuI �+•.:to is s o «o�.121 av« Sn.•�ys Q-a- rroQvi.. � y 3�L Yti AV �J C 42 Q 1S4 NY Y > 6s Ni �TRU at A'R 6 Q� 'CO CN\^O'�Y,aOCVA C1 tr.Uu`. i w `= O Ay Y VYQ. G Q t4 R S� Q UgyO C1 O 4 Q b a s QeC o A't•w..e. p 4 L • 0. 4 O ;q3 yy Q Q OQ yQVQNV€w�G Y Y p;M E >. � Ad QY bdNaCi�d Obi Q O O Nt. Lnu �yaL� 4 « d 4 4 rNu BMW @ ob d"'a e « •�'.a a o �' p a Y» • W � r d til... J*� N 1T •F N • �� Ga wa i ao� o.�d u^.do iau n�d uy � pi' uy^ oA�^ E4o G� K a ou wF pM udp ^9 Y.d ...E w Eu .OG y G O.C.�M 1. y=Ya.O.p. _ •t 0. ^n �O V NO MG C^ V 6Y N 2 A01'.4Y GAb� an.Nd ONA d.... Y ; aO y nYV p �9 d' O p+V GULO UL� E b L •A y �^4r dG A �C L •yy OOI+V dYLp� G EOYp C O N C. 40 M GC. 7 C•�M b y e EE G y Z y L �.q n L A': L L O Q p Y 4 G L^0 0 3 O+E y 4 '-L N w A-E^� Ly.L.va L-6N L]y qN:V Y V Y u L Y Z n L O w e y u p V Y a M' 01 Y C_ d W a 3 Y 't ^V p E 4 l� aOVn `y N+ •^Yv ^O Yq0 4yN Y.4L y ^ � S.R .1.. _ 4Uv • b LC + ^'EN OM 9 O ^^ 4Y O.G=Y.E 4^ A q N n Y �^ •A b G ��' t•L 4 A y�y 1 O N y a OO LOO^U CpE> 1L.«v �9 6C YOy C ZN T N..C.N C 6 L c yLp nC y G09 5�b.�Ca N+Y.S� a+NO p G+^••a ALY� v E �GO` Lb in. 6 S 'CW N pG EEy.YN^� LS' ^O Cp^.•G � .7.5.75. E.0 N V T O V C.1. N O Y t•.N`�>>a Y^.. y +'.C S C O C��+ Y .^4 L G O y `9 6 �G^^ O O.^ �•m.�.�O 60 p+V^N 4 H. Ld YL42YN ► Ul.4V� TO�..n OI V.VY C 9Of� ^ 4 n■ ^ Ap V V aY G AC A n na L ^V L a_ C C 6E d6 YC uniV u�u MAV�i vTid LL O YML G4. o ^Y O L F T N Y Ll G ^fi. W n•..^7[ G G. C L+. N 6 n n C N f.1 V Yl LS i - N bCVYLCC =}^ye V ;.L1 ..O,.ii C 4� p a .6t1 2p p p �Y} C�L'• pay OK ^ G$ .D py LP•s+ Lop b O^.p-L CI GOy pL LyF 21 LL^+ N� Ay6 Nq CLC qA n^@=dL� yL to p �F9$1� O Y LN .p�M NqN O.y C aq Rl SO.^A.= yup U 4 V L W Yo H1�C..p.4yuG ON 9ACA.ILN .0-4 =a 0mi ~emu ar• w!.E 49•G^��auo mom.>vu mw�s� r o �O^ii o _ —am u .a+r�n� �Gpyu vY +W pOb V�r. n.� ^V N.pW y FYO.yy A^.N^. vG Cb Ny O.4r ^L...� A^ N -L O yC •..p, Y y y ^G 6 C y 0 Occ j d C y n V r V dOt V .d.y 9CCa E.�. 0.2a0. L+97 ..Lp.6�i 4yp =NYot a '�V O ^S p 30� .Yc C a�a O. { N L '•E y O 9 N «q..C. :;-. 9.yN r .Cs U � Y TA api�a N YGO+J NNWw�� 22 _jp L E. NL ^9 C 9�CG Y �.. V no' c goa 0u J.zz od Gq.-o.L,p' ^4y p 9 'c o V _ WW d N �E>oor co+ LV L, LN4 �40 nC Nam' aU y9...nL` Ct•Y N +E �•^'. .. � L L:w p N ^>40.. OiL CL uq VL O.a x, J l9 yV� OY Lam. 9- i G A L C G .•.3 a y Y 4 E d p .0 y E tnyL� Y^+ �nL9 rp GY yw LO^6'Y C c�A.^U O 4� 9ayE L � vL Ey0 Niu =«YO L.L.'U�'CC• �.O yA.+y�' � _ •p C NNV Cp O C�..'H.NT NAMA.^i VLV Eq.O YC CCO 'i < 6LgCO\Ti 9 L tq L 6 N OLp 6.1 V U K A 6L G w L^ O V L V+ ^ V t y L C nt LZZ C E 4 O.b u N V n u ti O n 1••LN.G K^N.y N+ KY .pJ`.96Pl+W Pew �:�..4[wCiE. =eG.gK 64 q COyA� TC y ^y Py GL UC N.AgO =y p1Y r v LV '�O.00 q...NY .. �« S`Y •Q U O Y N Y Y Yf r v �� m s W G Y = d Y y C. q''p _ LNn. �1 •Yi. oq. t T^ rV {'^G ^e. & - q wPyy G m o N N N A L o 0 L C •.p S d,p,.N L r a.. Y� �adivv Z C= N UuO. 2/� a�.Y.N Tu uvw' Cno V«m b NNE =4 aW � ry Cf «b.YL La's'. ,y'P' c'^,n ..e `..ne ppr wo vaw c•'Y� Na^ P« .n ^U U p q Ij=.. <. �1•f Y y N P a. G y b q p . i rngiy NL co u a aq:�.✓$L'« tp. n� a^yy °' a ^ L A G i O� L«� M L N s L �y O r d•+N O O b 01.E p�y O q= a y P v,�d y n H 9 0 L O Y Q ,^b L y L G.!• s L Cq •g _ L6N bN^ Ntp Cam'• w ��" CWrO11 " L` q*V r-56 bb.••Yost LpVy. 6 py wLLi 'DULY � YY Olq 6L� N Y�Cq L �Gp qW0 �C .LWp 1Cit �`.; `.6�.V Ow^.�( C� ate` ^ Y AYO YY`Ys •� G JsQ n.t LgLYY �• �•O L A N N V 6 q ^Y Y q >L L a R y A' Y M w>♦ C C V y ^ LN q1 n` N 6 N.NYwO bcC O YC =y A�nv'• .I�. b C l G6 C L N'a NOy YY CY,GL S . iuq. Gd01 R .'�.w•' u N.rr mmo ay.�boe.'u L...jt Ewa.. N s N A N !N s C N 3 N 6 h N i K N V O�i tT A N 6 0 <q s ty!w C `Y b r•YL' 06 4Y 4..OgON. tl, s N .1 M O b .•0+ a U 0.L L 0. 6 ` V s 6 s a+Y q • >Y O. O d A p ^ w� ` ^ N q p V Y N C 6 L �O q N m Y�^Vb r LS ^ Ny wNbN ws .YG•a�s. ey^M Py �Yi] pYj .� ... y N yEa «uqb qL .-.i.Nyys C �••G ni' wa•NG � N� Ny w O� O.�dr Y.b ApGV `V p0`a L q n d Y 6 Y p b N 0. Q u^ C c G q E _ q b N L y L 4. An YqA r •`�Y SY b b. s0 N Y aM q T L.Y La N «� Y q= Y Lgyy E ud Yw � V b� OCY a� YY0.� L •0... H .Y.o aPMo N G � pm-. out^ AL aaq�c pg Y dC'• ^.w Y� � aw C.Gap « bNY rwNTeEL `q cE C � N ' rN O>NnV Y .yd.^ tpl LR. L G^1�N a, TY ryy Y a0 N.• AY ` OILL Y �.O.G r^bC O • C dgCl b C C .•`Y A G u O u Y^ =d V C � _= N tl w A r O L �� • s Y s O=y O.Cayi; Ly'q^ Y nC. LO GN =S VViLN NNy .. > ^ V. 6 n EE ap •+gg 0. YL r.Laa ..Lp; L =22 hO Y r.0 r.� ,,GG`pcW AG_}� 9Rr6 N`Y YeaL <..NO 4wlrm � 4bN 0.N <4J i9 I�ON�q S06 <M6A W6nMNss b Y N b ( rr V tlCY ' NYY VL} x 1tlL� VY q� C sFdy $YCS j ` c > L CLLtggi 00C 4 =0 2KyVC p Y U `''p" r°i`■■�I $cY �' n O U.'w L Y" agg'.'.0.o.d m L (y >Lu O N3Np`, v•J 3 � �tl+Y GuO.." W �.V. •� VI�'C L.`y.q .yam C. L4 V Vja M u m y^ q M .S 6vy u� d EN �- °•ob =oq. ac'c•+c tl'.L � YYe� gcuma c.Y-- - E� � �°' pia oe.Y Y �e =�VVW ,^�q Eaw L Y ..> '.'r "•uW YYo ". _ W ��aq ay"o.� oYYGtl o Y� s_ z C"M C O 6 Y Z Y.�L a- CL NjV V N �V OCeQ Tga �n v V V YaLB V ON C gEML O r J �U. X OOdCA LOytl O L N O w Va ...aO u.Y •Y..a^. e 2 E a =>c .2- uTZ ^ OA ".LW.N.G F" HYWL O G N 1.l Q G � H rl S r nN tl Ew a9ti i a�"Y yn c'e �. c5- N L Y .+^Lu OL9 C.Ou� a'C4 «N„^ UC Y`O Ltl uC CNtlL Q Y V J d ^ O V •N Ny �N ..� ti0 r ^ aL 9� � y"Y .� E V O V o h" O u o V •I• ^O'pNp >. VY V«OY 2 L06 tl p ^}Y TqY « N is c'aea 0Y ON "tl d'a E Yr ny E L Vi W V N T O � A V aN Y 2 n=O OHO C 89 w yu0 yL nU NY y YLY L�"N 9 �Ytl« >2 A6� 6wE Y a' 6. N a 6 �O'9 O T 6y�d va 2 ^ V d d 2E.o u w ^oo p c ^ Y a.�moo. E« u,d,R�• q` ^.Y 'a a.:'� C 6 m x^" N `Ndtl H .O.C i CUi Z O a L Cda"p .vir Pqp y�E C OE u:V VdN� ^g L u E v L v c«u 7 V ^O= ^ y3C. O�C wiG.yAC C_N u■ p Od yldr.V. Cr.NL Mg. A S aft •�' w N 3 0 "-Y...•mod, L u� ar:.c µ c � Yw o �•� Lu- uo« c L9w uV ` .LV•�P 'OL c4 M N.Lv�� GCS V6L= PL b1EW +�l Zr 6YYN W H ` �p�/ c aim uav Lu�L y .. «o a u < wE wa yj ai 04 Y ✓ .� H V t .AFL =C LO. Qy. NnN NyNWO QN O� �� V O V YNO`L Y 6wLYCU y ^ •� n a.o.DL4 � tH a a _qa.D O^O� adOYb� dT YY. UY I Y 'D «E Ou.y C ` 66O Y�Yu.. 'ON C CO 9 a-91 dt. L CC O eL gg Z. C N YOQ1n aY Y w C tl m« Y y Y w ^ Y�PO 9yC L C•+ w w w. LL U wL0 aN_. �.. LC Cd00 qY ii a D� V NbV On `..V Y d ��YLYY..L� V D �� dY. �� V•• V^ O nw y W m�0� <O�YOO�� jM VyyyO upps S� M O Y } C �OCW GO � YM L19 i'r n•D6 Lp' >� � O O ZE G R y -0 Ot� .— - C.AE W -. N.n a E Y.• c� CND O LY `OZ wm d =mYO.. w cC< Of n' y V YnL W� N�C ^L Y w • DIY� ♦— C L-O'► L L OI -N N wNm6 q'0101 C�i•Dr Yr� = Y CU^ L YG Y.•�• YCY�CC C«.�V 9y N4w^. IL y C Vy Gq C Cy 0• y q0 LG Wu d!:0a 9q9^ V^G 01 F6 W� dqa. EE w.4' Y gv y YJ C7 VO C Y^O J is C 2L a9p VCO 9^ Y.. r� 9� U^ QMtw TDO L� X. Yu.NC Nip{�, Yw�yN y ODt u VpCw o y-'O..01. vzs cg Uy� y y �Dg• Y .0 N C d Wp C 4Y y C O CT Y9 N v J -W qyM L L LYy D YAa«ip^. U YT O J0\ Y 6 y, d.+ �.y yN y� .0.. NY TOEY Y CN O1 ONC qq.. LLL ^t ::y nCl9` L6M dY w N p �0 y R:; �Ot E=nD 6 no y. w EE «u qm n_Li.N cD".`N' a� yW w•v w` 1.c a� � « a`o�=� u vo. cza'my v qF CaM "NHL LV9a0�L ^ yy y r0� b r «. COY LOG C dt Oy LV4 «Y CE OpN LY. 1L �q OTC Ta uyc _CV L^ b,p^N C Lt 10..«G« E L S y� Dy O N 624N C r aaa> uai'n'.D Y ra+,co uc� n a w a n W�a Wuv pia ia�nz <� <o cmu �o .[ w a y .4` 4I el - VQL 4P 'G4Y. O ^ uyy6 Y O M � y4 tcq g ELa'N' uJo uyr � �u �F.sc� a $ ou i Sw� s� uG G a L c u C t y.gab pC.- U y �. .� J$Lis 'Sw frg� tl Sup n°� a us. Ch xtl - a O.a i s. 0. uu �✓n tl L � 4 ^u g �� s N v � � na yQtlN NQ p`y= N C ��'�OuJol tl.YS 0.�,, 3AO G E� y�` a 4 fitly Ya y s ON �n 'Yd b a„ _ �^ �.a ^Pe'a: NL. a.y�u�y. �ytl as 'A„q � " c �=• V.N >� :c a may' �Nr Vq C� G $9.w nFi�{. tlb wu..g 'aµ c.'" S ' 4 a N O tl tl s V V C L p1 V d 0 yy - a=•_ NV 6�� iGi i.0 W+L+N L.Ii..l 30 VW 4.r 'O Av waN S� x)sc I tlN u FN E a q e Lw. $ 79 gg $ a zL s... ..L N Y a M- 0 i « yoyb �v P�. L V a' C S V L p 'a LlY Ab • as G ti 9q @@ OV ' V itl C Wti * � b.N _py T 6 CyyyUO. Sy Lu N C++ C6�� u tl V .V..! L yyyggp CV N1 V F p 4 c C Cyy 6 tl aF tl�[VvO. Dy 6 aoe C N .- Vr y�M CO aC RQ F�IHp 'r Y y �=a �! q Lil �< Cu N t9 y o �tl^ Yb.O E.K L 6Vit �'y V QyO O.w `t rn N N tl C O �C 6 X O M �'a'•r V 9 pF Lx^ C Ny� Ct5 Cy >>Z �i, L _� 2 Ma C 'N�LC L 9�L LPN C Y. y L Y tl V S i! cO e E o. V ^ `G^ 4 at V. 4c4 s Gyzr.N.� W u .o. 4a N6y+� ID Ol tb I ) ) s� �Nti Q U d •n 0 a G C_N 0a�t �RY Y Ldu4 t�.t!.^ 3 uCC.Y.� vats C "nfUM � y O N.LN at '_ A L U 43p OA a W Y w Y N tQ Y4dq Y•W v� d 'QW. } a T~'1�.. N' 0.s _ A y N a a Y� L • Q9O C t L �L! L^ V N Y6L YL O YMVm. MU Y LYy �C� L G r Y � q .�..dR 9r.�YC C p �• . ��CLY. ZL � VY~ M rar Y aai La RV VQ Yq�Y n ya L wYi b 'Yay • E~ N Nh qC � V Ma:K� L. y�V,•a+ u� u r> V- Co ]ec vO N� NaLiYy V V.Y.E Cd u4 YV YV to LP j« qt dW Ly ap ICY O {. VC d O N Y vYT y n N .d-. N•.. �� gz,r L O G L w =CI V r y Y O _ N>L L SCt CI �YL tO 6 N� Cyr T YLyC V wRyW 2W C ^Tw. N6 CQCa4 .M Y C try w L i-1.lE +1=.C- E Y C Y ,,C•O '� NT M vV1 NNLs�yY NY t MCo La 1 pV CYj N'L Y t 9 C�qL oa.�u, � Lu.L7 d� a d+ $n:Y.� .- v•'•� E L}O VERB W y w Y1 pp O^ pYN W4� I.n= i. Al Y.Y. gVC `J ..mot q Y Ouc yNtT SSW �� Y V `� = h Lp 4.RF Pr O� < Y•n Rol 'Yr r= A 4 YL1. 1- C C L LM 3 C � ppwC Yam+ �4u N MEN {W 6r• 6E 6Nv.N Fi .CC h'+' aJtip 2tl{L Fw.p AO Y � Y a w M ♦ N b �` o a — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ° a �> • DATE: September 24, 1986 14;7 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Cortmissi3n FROM: Brad Buller, City Fanner BY: Nancy Fong, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 86-15 e esa3TT s imen t Ta mo or ome bus assem y usiness within an existing 168,000 square foot industrial building, and the 83,000 expansion of such existing industrial building on 11.8 acres of land j in the General Industrial/Rail Served District (Subarea 2), located at the southeast corner of Arrow Highway and Vineyard Avenue - APN 209-013-15. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86-13 - MODIFICATION - MESSENGER - The request o ono i y e previous y approve as er an by reducing the site area of Phase III m 4.4 acres to 2.9 acres in the General Industrial/Rai: Served District (Subarea 21 located at the northeast corner of 9tn Street and Vineyard Avenue - APN 20-012-16. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a Conditional Use Permit for a mo or ome us assembly use, and approval of site plan, elevation, and modification to Phase III of the Master Plan for Development Review 86-13. - B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoni7.y; Apartment under cons ruction; Medium Residential District (8-14 du/ac). South - Vacant; General Industrial/Rail Served (Subarea 2). East - Vacant with approved 26-acre industrial master plan; General Industrial/Rail Served (Subarea 2). Hest - Mini warehouse, multi-tenant industrial park; General Industrial (Subarea 1). C. General Plan Designations: rojec i e - enera n ustrial/Rail Served. North - Med4,am Density Residential. South - General Industrial/Rail Served. East - General Industrial/Rail Served. West - General Industrial. i ITEM F PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 86-15 - MESSENGER/CROWN COACH September 24, 1986 Page 2 D. Site Characteristics; The site is developed with a 168,000 square rRoo-f-lindustrial building with approximately 280 parking spaces. The southern portion Of the project site is vacant and is part of a previously approved nhase III of the Masten Alan for OR 86-13. E. Applicable Regulations: The proposed use is categorized as medium manu acturIng which requires a Conditional Use Permit within General Industrial/Rail Served District Subarea 2 of the Industrial Area Specific Alan.. II. ANALYSIS• A. General., The site was originally developed as a manufactu,+ay FuRiTffWheats Mg Elevator for Otis torhome Assembly 4 The Plant xistinga building is last s ppres nitly unoccupied. Some on-site and off-site improvements exist; however, certain improvements are considered as non- conforming, For example, missing improvements include such items as meandering sidewalks, extra 4-foot dedication along Arrow Highway, on-site landscaping, screening of outdoor storage and plaza areas. Crown Coach International is prt.;,Osing to r.locate from their Chino facility to this existing building. They are proposing to expand the existing building by adding 83,000 square feet of floor area in order to accommodate their assembly business of motorhome and school buses. To comply with the City's parking requirements, the site area has to-expand southerly to include a portion of Phase III of an approved Master Plan (Development Review 86-13) as shown in Exhibits "C" and "D". Since bath parcels are owned by the same developer, Messenger Investment Company is requesting for an amendment to the previously approved Master Plan by reducing the size of the Phase III site area. To alleviate heavy traffi,: along Vineyard Avenue, the developer is providing access to 9th Street -through Phase III of the Master Plan of DR 86-13, and take ,advantage of the traffic lights at the intersection of 9th Street and Vineyard Avenue. S. Design Review Committee: The Committee has reviewed the projec an as recommen ed that the project be improved with the following conditions: 1. Site Plan; a. The Committee determined that the loading dock could be located an the :vest side of the building due to: PLANNING COMMF,SSMN STAFF REPORT CUP 86-15 MESSENGER/CROM COACH September 24, 1986 } Page 3 o The fi ni died'grade established by the existing buildingf o The natural slope of the land fr6nt north to south, and F'$ o The nature of the assemblyfng operation. E However, it shall be screened with a combination of decorative block wail, mounding, and landscaping from Vineyard Avenue. The length of the screen wall shall bu determined by the City Planner. b. The existing site area should be upgraded, as much !" as possitle, to conform to current City's Codes. Only one driveway access �'lould be allowed on l Vineyard Avenue and Arrow Highway. The existing driveway on Vineyard Avenue acres,;,, from the proposed loading dock should be eliminated, Two of the three existing driveways on Arrow Highway should be eliminated and redesign the driveway access as shown in Exhibit "K c. Straight ;_?dewalk should be provided along Vineyard Avenue. d. The existing concrete wall should be continued along the entire length of the project on Vineyard Avenue. e. The developer should fully improve the driveway - access to 9th Street. f. A six-foot wide landscape planter or a continuous six to eight foot high block wall should be provided along the entire length of the existing and the proposed building (east elevation), for screening the outdoor storage of finished vehicles as shown in Exhibits "L" and "H". g. Employee outdoor eating area or plaza area should be provided on the north side of the existing building. i PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 86-15 -MESSENGER/CROWN COACH September 24, 1986 Page 4 h. A uniform design of fencing :-aterials (block wall, wrought-iron and security gates) should be provided. The existing chain-link fence and barbed wire should be replaced with wrought-iro, materials, 2. Elevations: a. The existing building should be upgraded with re painting the buile-ng, replacing any broker windows, providing ref screen in sc �ening all roof-mounted equip: -ts, b. The expos_d footing of the new building located at the west and south elevations should be covered with materials consistent with the architecture to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. "Landscapi„g; a. All existy.na trees should be saved by remaining in place or relocated to a wore suitable area. b. A six-foot wide landscaped planter should be provided along the east property boundary for the entire length of the paVing area as shovm on Exhibits "E and "H". Ij. c. Special landscaping treatments sush as increased number of trees and shrubs, should be provided witiAn the setback area along Arrow ii;ghway per City requirements. d. The double row of specimen, size trees should be continued along the setback area of Vineyard Avenue, to be consistent with the existing portions of the site. C. Grading Committee; The Grading Committee has reviewed the proposed grading plan and was concerned with the 9 foot to 12 foot high retaining walls along the eastern property bou-dary as shown on Exhibits "F" and "G". Current standards allow a maximum of 4 foot high retaining wail with a maximum wail height of 9 feet including the four feet retaining portion. The Committee recommended that the developer mitigate the aesthetic and visual impact- of .he retaining walls by providing terraced planters as shown in exhibit "G". This mitigation measure requires cooperation from the adjacent property owner or developer. Since the adjacent property owner and developer PLANNING COMMISSION STAPF REPORT CUP 86-15 - MESSENGER/CROWN COACH Septei6er 24, 1986 Page 5 is the same one as this project, a Condition of Approval requiring terraced planters along z;.o west property boundary for 0evelopmea Review 36-13 has teen placed in a separate Resolution for the modification request for this approved Master Plan. G. Environmental Assessment: Staff has completed the Environmental ec ist an as e5irined that the development of this project may expose people or property to water-related hazards such is flooding. However, a drainage study has been required to be submitted to the City for review in order to determine the mitigation measures for alletriatinq the potential problem of hooding on-site to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Therefore, staff has determined that there will not be significant impact in case because the mitigation measure as recommended has been added to the Condituns of Approval. If the Planning Commission concurs with these findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the General Plan and e n ustrte pecific Plan in tha the s~.te plan znd building design with the added conditions provide for a safe working environment; the proposed use promotes employment opportunities as an integral part e, a halanced community. In addition, the proposed use, building design, site plan, together with the recommended Cnnditions rkf Approval are in compliance with each of the applicable prov;sicns of the Development Code and Specific Plan. The proposed use, togethez,.-th conCtions applicable thereto, would not be detrimental to 'the public health, safety and welftrre, or materially injurious to properties or improvements it the vicinity. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been,advertised in The Daily Report newspapers and public,hearing notices were sent to all properties w`t In _ 300 feet of the project site. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planing Commmiss'on con—der a input regarding this project. If the Commission conch - ,, the findings, then issuance of a Negative Declaration and approval of Conditional Use Permit 86-15 and modification to Development Review 86-13 would be appropriate. Res tful'y s u mitted, t_ Brad Buller City Planner Planner DC:NF:ko ® PLANNING 1,0011S ION_ ... g STAFF RtPORi CUP 86-15 - MESSENGER/CROWN COACli September 24, 1986 Page 6 , Attacnmentss Exhibit "A" -,Locati.on Map s� Exhibit "B" - Site Utii;xation Map Exhibit "C" - Approved Master Plan for OR 86-13 Exhibit "D" Modification to Phase: III of the Master Plan for DR 86-13 £rnibit "E" - DetaAAd Site Flan Exhibit "F" - Conceptual Grading plan Bound Exhibit "&" - Terraced Planters Aiong East Property . - Exhibit !ary - Conceptual Landscape plan -� Exhibit I'll, - Elevations Exhibit "J" Location of New .Drivew&,y on Vineyard Avenue Exhibit KI' Redesign af.New Driveway on Arrow highway E Exhibit L Detail of Off-Site. Improvement at the f intersection of Arrow Highway and Vineyard Avenue Resolution of Approval with Standard Congnlons for CUP 86-15 Resolution of Approval for OR 86-13 Modl?t'tation f S = A - EA 2 �.L s • t ARR i its v G„ '� �N3� f t11 31 t f� �cj'f AT� k x• � �� 2 iK. i Feron NORTH CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG ° nTm. • EXHIBM {4 F, L� MtI MM..F(ilpY/N wb}MI WJ DULCH r[ ��t RiILL p � 7-Ml V . •. trlArN9 fFA£ 'q � � 1 I nc�v�m.enx; l_ 21 zzn L i0 C_. ---I . � w4eerr CITY OF ULM. _ RANCHO CUCAM NGA TITLE- t T J t lFI ANr3ING DTVLSIaN EXf-HMrr- Sc:ALE- " a F m � I 3 i f 1 r : V m - ~ .b •. , 7 W oN 1W" i�u o z z Z .3 I c,, a y0. 3nN3AY OUVA3NIA CW � 4 � y Mm f I•Mri •—{ �. I 'ttt� ' ,• ... A .C7 T I i laTlt! ! I��I , Ism- a r v 91a0 xraa I x•• .`--�`�` :7—� f I 4 } �- � ! ;-'�;.j m—p t I77 1 W t tu zg cry 1 ' - �O RI,ZW u 3 � ma co ' w 4 (� 3tIN3AV vNi cr € vi R \ .YIU:i WRACE PROPOSED HOUSING I/7SA`JA�`.� r t«�.lraw A, .ir-'ARROW ROU n�.0 1�7T� GM"lTtN� �IQld�f134� v• } --wry-- ,F --. �tj� Alf 95 f. r PROPOSED AUTO � ( r-� / •— '� .SEIf-SERVICE, q��[(�q yyy111 Tr �tti1[OAr617F It 4/; C[�ONVA0 ExISnNG lfiLOt 7G i 4 � } G71174nR s'1'OR t ePROP,OS ED MU�L' 5E BUILDINGS /Ria O'FQIJPT�gI'Ft IS{E� ''r^{ eArcrr J h � - a PROJECT DATA V1luG •aNT1 faL lV2.V. lt4rla V. �A41 1 21t1M Ia1.lr0 YNI V. 04a00 .tl lT.tW tprlVa 11 Irau«l rrawu v.pnAultl�rlal� ,� Te iw.a. velar T�rOI* a{uo. .rwulwl I _ _.I ..ula4auwie � tl a{u.,oalaa . 1 1 n R .II II wl Tuu..t.lwara rta n arual4autaaa 1 rA4lK rrpYr.p ITr X iT.lYAartVN PR W�fF�L .nnaarowrene WAREHOUSE FACIIJTY CAI( 1 L.��ii�T=iY Illlllf 1110m1 inreMu»w.rweo.eo �� 17TI ITSNWIY /QO �j�p ,nibn..r�r.l,m I SITES PLAN U�—�• � III II�T�� setar rnra- —==L—Dp� INn Ilr ulnl lu ;� rsm�f ' CROWN COACH MANUFACTURING V� ASSEMBLY FACILITY RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA 15A`L, osY41 �JA►l�d rss+/ NORTH M) lit 161" CITY OF ITEM: C 11 A1�TC IO CUCAlVI0I0TG� TTTLE. 7 /C& 5)rg r PLANND� D OON EXI-Mrr-.._p,SCALE: J-_�� , .. --A 2 wFICt /VI.A C.: !•:/' - ��-III Yi efttJu flEf10M A.A •Y 1 i yp F rr ^, EXISTING BUILDING. Faowerlae!Mtn \i , 1 Y ` FF ! i •1 I 1♦Ir[ C4lCF[ j:Cr _f__�lYd'in/ zm is ,:-, pETOM _ < �14 M° NEW EXPANSION 6' IIIIIIIIIIIIIJ111 if fill Aff r _ ♦ ry1Vti OtViL,ORYIR 1 I' F. 14"m stueT NORTH ,CITY OF 1,rv1: RANTCHO OLJ IVIO.NTGA 1 PLANM G DIV61 EXHIBIT.___ SCALE- —f.2 lap DF cvR�3 V/9Rtfs Fibj �tZOs�j �9°�rz� /'37•l --• .�5lf1+ hD�� l� {� of CJRLk ,3,;,0 TO 37 0 A �ECTiON s-s nF F2�?�S6D Gi OAK F1b+ AY 6�Cfb1lD , ,�r+�Xa �L` �f �i•5 NORTH CITY OF ITEM: RANCHO CUCAMONGA Tri . PLANNING DIVISM EXHIMT: �SCAIE-,,. VILLA MIRA IGE PROPOSED HOUSING ki, ,n: � , � ica1L ��P9lAt>I�`.Kq 11 ff an�vw ROUTE- 'IT �• !t aK 1 K=� I Wa .• »,•,>"� ExIsnNG E.n+.olNr, I LJL 21 y... �m K .�NEW EXPj%ANSION, �'M•F iFhCf T K YY4 i/i'�r°" ��• ' >wit.+ vM •W+�,f9icYJtMp�j .KXI:W4.+.7 — F/N '�•.plcya fa! r_ CROWN COACH MANUFACTL'P.ING ASSERANCHO C FACILITY \ RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CAL�FOhNIA NOM Cl,1'Y OF rrEM-. PLANCHO C'UCAMONGA TrfLE:—W-AVA � PLANNING T`nSION E. MI•I':_. SCALE; /' r .. i t . ,.Tam e 1 1—+t.. z U x c Z N "• a �- 1 i .77 K$ j� Lnp Him HE lu i f / s !, I i r ------------- ARROW ROUTE Y-40*2b EXISTING RETAINING in / id!@PF�3 WALL —� co NEW SIDEWALK 10'—J'WIDE CITY OF WALK c C rr TYP. M ' + 352' + h OFFICE MF,ZZA "INE { —EXISTINGAD GC EXISTIN ALL t 1 h GROUND YEL — DRIVE—IN OR t EXISTING BUILDING = 1= {-� �. z- x �,•I R i jz5 2v MET CANO= 1 NORTH CITY OFeA RANTC O CUCA.MC tiTGA Tom:. rA FLANK M DIVLS MT P_xHI>3cT. SCAT x: s , . ARROW RCU*rE VK(l EXISTING RET1fWAG. WAk-1, ° M Nt'W SIDEWALK 10-0 WIDE CITY RIGHT OF Wt.LK �7 ��_.� • _ _ roc. w—�oy..e1��•� •..f.•'. ..: .. .sm *{ �� Q a •~�d�� i� I � ti�•`^' �,_` bd.X,,ryp. T! , , -- - 1(1 afrR ................ 352' - _1 OFFICE MEZZANINE ,EXIS Ft�- —EXISTIN ALL,• s ii Gs?owl) X,iCL I r DRI4£-IN npOR 1 s ,•• ! a I EXISTING BUILDING 1 it � �� • d r� NORTH CITY OF RA NTCHC) C UCAMINGA .Trim�� , PLANNING DIVIIT"N LX:-11BCT-,� ; 7 k d s i ew .', ' r�laµ�er,artd' wa/l ctest�.c� ALI KperiB lN� :jabjCd fil fAd P-M&I �pircv&l of file 1 Ivy P/ate tev, i F ITFJM w JC N A -TIT11-= -A t �'e', e r n ��rW&O PLr ,<- EXHur, sc.ALE._- x RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION" OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSIOPi APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE tERMIT 86-15 FOR TyiE MOTORHOME/BUS ASS61BLY BUSINESS AND THE 83,000 SQUARE FOOT EXPANSION TO THE EXISTING INDUSTRIAL BUIOMG La ATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW IGHWAY AND VINEYARD AVENUE IN THE' C NERAL INDUSTRIAL%RAIL SERVED DISTRICT rSUBAREA 2) OF THE INDUSTR-AL SPECIFIC PLAN WHEREAS, an t:ne 29th day of August, 1986, a complete application was filled by Messenger Investment Company `or review of the above-described project; and WHERE..;, on the 24th_ day of Septebber, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonq Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above-describi?d project. follows:: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use with 1he added conditions is in accord with t"e General Plan, the objectives of the indusirial Specific Plan and the purposes of the district in whicf_ the site is locate, and that: a. It provides a pieasai.?*, attractive and safe working environment. b. It promotes employment opportunities as an integral part of � balaticed-community. c. The site plan has decreas-A the non-conformity of the existing fac l i ty to comply with the current Development Standards. 2. That the pro, G;d use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, would not be detrimental to the public health, sa:°ety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. .1. that the site is s0 table and adequate for the proposed use in development. { 4. That the proposed use will not have a substantial adver,e economic effect on the nearby uses. S. That the proposed use 61mclies with each of the applicable provi,tions of the lndustrSa7 Specific Plan and the Development Code, PLANNING COMMISSION RESti'LUTION 'N0. CUP 86-15 - MESSENGER September 24, 1985 I Page Z SECTION Z: That this prof-jet, together with mitigation measures` kr included in t e onditions of Approval, will not create adverse impact on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on September 24, 1986, SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Pc. it 86-i5 is approved subject to the following conditions: Planning Division: 1. The proposed loading dock shall be screened with a combination of decorative block wall, mounding and landscaping from Vineyard Avenue. The length of this screen wall along Vineyard Avenue shall be determined by the City Planner. Plans shall he k submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 2. The existing driveway on Vineyard Avenue across from .the proposed loading dock shall be eliminated. Only one driveway access shall be ailowed on Vineyard Avenue. t 3. Onb one driveway ac:ess on Arrow Highway shall be allowed. Two of the three Existing driveways shall be eliminated. The final � design of the most eastorly driveway access shall be submitted for City Planner review and epprovul prior to issuance of building permits 4. Straight sidawalk si;all be provided along Vineyard Avenue. 5. The existing concret€ wall shall be continued along the entire length of the project on Vineyard Avenue. 6. The developer shall fully improve the Or4veway access and providing landscaping along this driveway access to 9th Street, 7. A six.-foot wide landscape planter or a continuous six-foot to eight-foot high block wall shall be provided along the east property bouj,.,lary. The entire length of this landscape planter or block wall shall he from the existing buiid�ng south to the end of the proposed building (east elev&lion). 8. Employee outdoor eating area or plaza area shall be provided ott the north side of the existing building. Detailed plans shall be provided vo the satisfaction of the City Planner. 9. A uniform design of fencing materials (block wall, wrought-iron and security gates) shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. The l existing chain-link fence and barbed wire shall be,removed and ,replaced with the approved design of the fencing materials. ,' r ; PLANNING COMMISSION RESOiUTION NO. CUP 86-15 - MESSENGER, !' September 24, 1986 Page 3 �. 10. The existing facility shall be upgraded with re-painting the bull ding, replacing broken windows and providing roof screens to scc-een all roof-mounted equipments. Detailed plans f6r roof screens shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 11. The exposed footing of the new building located at the west and south elev;,lions shall be covered with materials consistent with the architecture to theljsatisfaction of the City Planner. 12.. Special landscaping trdatment such as mounding, increased number of trees, shrubs and t!)b size of the trees shall be provided to the east elevation an" south elevation of the new building to mitigate the visual 4pact of the exposed footing of the building. 13. All existing trees sha`il be saved in place or relocated to a ° suitable area. Decaying or diseased trees shall be replaced with specimen size trees. Any removal, replacement or relocation shall require review and approval of a Tree Removal Permit prior to issuance of grading permits. 14, A six-foot wide landscaped planter shall' be provided along the east property boundary for the entire length of the parking area as shown in Exhibit "H 15. Special landscape treatments such as increased number of trees and shrubs, increased size of trees shall be provided within the setback area along Arrow Highway per City requirements. 16. The double row of specimen size Plum trees shall be continued along the setback area of Vineyard Avenue. 17. A continuous.hedgerow to screen parking area that �,°ronts on Vineyard Avenue and along south property boundary shall _on provided. 18. The developer, applicant or the property owner- shall work with the adjacent property owner, developer or applicant in mitigating the adverse visual impact of nine feet to twelve feet high retaining wall by providing terraced type planters as shown in Exhibi, "G". Detailed plans shall be submitte.i to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to issuance of grading permits. Engineering Division: 1. Existing Overhead Utilities: Alk a. Vineyard Avenue - The existing overhead utilities (electrical except for the 66KV electrical) on the project side of Vineyard Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first , pole on the north side of Arrow Route to the ' Y CUP 85 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. 71 15 MESSENGER 1 ` September 24, 1986 E t Page 4 t, first pole south of the project boundary_ prior ( to public improvement acceptance or occu ancy i whichQver occurs first. Reimbursement of one- half of the adopted cost of undergrounding from future development as it occurs on the opposite R' of the street is feasible from the presentiy undeveloped properties (minor portion). ;j b. Arrow Route - An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future- urdergrounding of the existing overheae utilities (telecommunication and electrical) on the opposite side of Arrow Raute shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fees shall be one- half of the adopted unit amount times the length from the center of Vineyard Avenue to the east property boundary (554 feet). c. The existing service to the existing building crossing Arrow Route shall be undergrounded from the north side of Arrow Route to the building project prior to acceptance of public improvements or occupancy Whichever occurs Ask first, 2. The primary access to the site shall be from 9tih Street. Reciprocal access easement shall be required prior to issuance of building permits. I 3. Driveways on Vineyard Avenue: a. Reconstruct the southerly .driveway to City Standard with a mirimum 35 feet wide including a right-turn pocket (deceleration lane) and _ pest for a no left-turn onto Vineyard Avenue. I b. Remove the northerly driveway and replace it with curb, gutter and sidewalk to City Standards. c. Provide striping for back-to-back left-turn pockets for the new driveway and the existing one to the north on the west side of Vineyard Avenue, 4. Driveways on Arrow Route: a. Remove the entire circular driveway including the parking stalls and replace with curb, gutter, sidewalk and landscaping. b. Reconstruc- the easterly driveway to City Standards of T.4nimum 35 feet wide. .y PLANNING COMMISSIOC RESOLUTION NO. CUP 86-15 . MESSENGER September 24, 1986 _ Page 5 fqW S. The curb return at the southeast corner of Vineyard avenue and Arrow Route shall be reconstructed in accordance with Exhibit The deve':)per shall bear the cost of relocati:;c the traffic signal required by the reconstruction. 6. A temporary drainage wale from the southeast corner of the site ;o the northeast corner of °yh`Street and Vineyard Avenue or an aiternative drainage solution as approved by the City Engineer shall be constructed prior to occupancy. A drainage easement shall be obtained to issuance of a bui',ling permit. ra 7, Sidewalk along Vineyard Avenue frontage: a. Construct a 12-foot wide sidewalk from the existing 12-foot wide sidewalk to the southerly property boundary as shown in Exhib*t "E". b. Provide tree wells including irrigation per City Standard with a 12-fORt ,sidewalk. 8. A lot Zinc ad7ustiaent shall be completed prior to issuance of a building permit to extend the southerly properly lire more to the south to include t?ie entire property to be used for the parking lot wi&irk ttte project parcel lines. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMB 'R, 1986. P►ANNING COMMISSION 0- THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ffennis L. Stout, Chairman — ATTEST: Brad Buller, epu y ecre ary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, aid Adopted by the Plannina Commission of the rity of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of September, 1986, by the following vote-to-wit: X.ES: COMMISSIONERS. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 7 RESOLUTION NO.. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86-13 REGARDING PHASE III OF THE MASTER PLAN LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF 9TH`STREET AND VINEYARD AVENUE IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL/RAIL SERVED DISTRICT (SUBAREA 2) OF THE INDUSTRIAL. SPECIFIC PLAN € WHEREAS, on the 29th day of August, 1986, a complete application was filed by Messenger Investment Company for the review of the above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 24th day of September, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above-described project. r NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECT*ON 1 : That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed modification to Phase III of the Master Plan is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and; 2. That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Industrial Specific Plan and the purpbses of the district in which the site is locatEd; and, 3. That the:•proposed modification to the Pnase III of the Master Plan is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and, 4. That the proposed use, togethe. with conditions applicable thereto, will not, be Getrimental to the public healthy, safety or welfare, or materially - injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environmen a an that a Negative Declaration has been i .,u-sd for the Master Plan (DR 86-13) on July 23, 1986. SECTION 3: That Development Review 86-13 modification is approved subject to e o owing conditions and attached standard Conditions: Planning Division: 1. The proposed Phase II! development are approving concept only. Future development shall be subject to Development/Design Review process for Planning Commission approval. PLANNTidG CDtS16?t°(QSOLt11I0N NO. � DR 86-13 - MOCkiCAT1oN - MESSENGER September 24, 86 Page 2 ' ems' ? 2. All conditions contained wiAhin Resolution 86-110 shall dpply. • 3. The developer, applicant, or the property owner shall work with the &3Uacent property owner, devel oper,or ' applicant in m'i ti gati ng the adverse vi-,ual impact of the nine foot to twelve a' foot high retai ,ng wall by providint terraced.type of planters as shown .in Exhibit "G" of CUP E6-16. Detailed plans shall be submitted to the Planning Division for rev,ew and approval prior, to issuance: of~ gradinq, permits for Phase 11 development of bR- 86-13. f APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA' ,. 'AY: �., ennis ou , airman-? ATsEST; ` .. Brad u'i er, Deputy ecr-`e ry I, Brad Buller,' Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commis$ion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted b, ie Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held oi: the 24th day of Septembe;% 1996, by the following vote-to-wit; AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: C014MISSIONERS: l i iT•n....pL�.y� gCOA ^d v�•..� Nv.... .-d.0 .Y a Q-uo n v g asdv�yu, Yda dvu co q`Gw� Nd� aN L`oa L Y A P• N n n O C z g d .V p L w M n Y S F z O n cy>C L p Q v A y Q^n w p C t d y n v a^E pp @ O a.%a�e d� EOp J y v E L y =9 TCF vva wq0 Una �9 EF6 Q C g n p d nG d€ N^ L S 2 >"!+ YN od =uµ La'ngYw wC06 N .^..Y. Gam'.. CO.M _C•rF NdG eQd Q L6'A f.. EEE d tCYJ VL OEE6 YQ.AIrp »CQCN nNVCN AO O•S XG.2 d ■N C V'c^ w H YOnY ONTE ygC.'• 7._a6M Q C Q L1 Gv 6. C ! 4 Y Q pa .. ti OG�w if6 Gnu C.TQ F. LCCN Lv��D. $ pYr •.a.Qn�.i'^ •-cu iNc 3.5 p�U C^A aCinY` ~•p,•6uNi�_ Y�� y�C Yd C NL'6>.ti•O'•. �.` d U�i'w YC d ^aN CtC p LN^�aN+U T Y f <Q O u i m x �W L G s p y 01y H �g • ' •' SM p_uF w^a^n . xF cAA .. w aA y, ny �Lr. •� ... q U q za O C Y c N79 d Y,�t 'adT ob r> 3� y �ia�^WpL j .pT p'fl � cQ NY�^uxpo i N � L aCY syiY.. v Yt JNyi u� Y A G n N l: Z N M' J ��• C � C.�6uJi v W nA C A.a..40w YA nM G ty} ••�+ ` A O N t N c` M F N4C >• ri. rdi O E O Uy u we _ 1 Y J L.v-.m L LMy��dFFq x z x o ;: �� J 14 6 ' • �•OaL Ot Intl i.0 UY aL.� • Y l^U>•,Utl UY • tl � YCCa C>TO�N pal C. L Y � O d.• �4 u C p.U E !.�.=q �. G Y � y Y 'e e".. r 'tin Yw��.��oo P •^ �rL pa,.q -a a� r<v E�ua [Q$.N7N RLL q u p'qp W wN CNH< u'� � N�3d vi pREEU �w uy. Ua•. Uq L Oapi YpR yp^� 'q4 F ��^ Lp a NCY 4^Y pgRO UM o ea.p.A.•. 9N.N. apnp �� ^:FVN �nV • tyL pwY O'��'� P.Cw .� t^ L Ag 9N N LL•. uCyN Ow HOZ..QLL �^4N� L NW 41 ^4�L �� y.� '�^,.L. Y O U^6p 6 i€.y AW 1C 0. L N�VO• Y� = aLNL a=vF pac'V^VN G.NC CJJ� T ` aZZd, u0 O � 4N y� OY U W tl w�lq� =U C^CC apN� �Mi V '+N•K^Q L. . sf t Y •� Oy g0. W Y tly^N yN=Ow �O V.CyO U V.•n �•.+Y _ ,2,TC}• 33Nw •1 wY.a 4w 4 it- tljw•Y•• UU •^w R q C L.0 y • C Y V O O L O•r 0. ��> Y Ct•� O�•N•a.&e L.'a. '"L•=Ui-C�•��w Y ^O Ni v i� p j•w :-O~ wN R.CLwR pp].GN Aat NA N^ C ..6C yaC*7 (!Nj{Z VOUr.. C40 O�iN+pp Gy` rt type^I .��.... $COpO `bC G LOI C YO Aba•Q i Y Ny VN•d p. CpYV ~S. YCZ4 gf wNW @t � N pL'6 -91..^ VC' C.•>.UCY C:p". �' ^�$ • Y_O y.d O VL NOOF N.` i'u _r••.-.Z'=7YN Las a YO 8Y Ov. iv w wa Ys c Y�`� Yupp�'.$�^c.N v c cY ` w�+ co yy Y- C 9 6\[�r W •O. y QQS^ G �C'y Y YSO LY 44C CGV �tl.�e4gUbJy 'J•6Y.µ 01� OYtl L LCV. C i U C a30 F<E.F6.6 .CNYY� NMNM4I EMU Y �vfi N Uapi�6 W ��_ �.c 4L/\ap•� NO..G nba V G • • N E 1 qC0s ?` ~YC LAN w •�.4• •�tl atl •M YU'U•N Ui•L! a—q •Y.•. g�c .u.'•" M u..w $.N-u �$. dL `oy»o ` Y ZY ACO ti'CCL w7 w �� EY9 ^ G� Z c L p yU. iN a3� VqN 0.�. Y WW U Op•'•^ .. CYY� KY'BCw~ wC'Y^A NL� LpHO u0 3. ah g94p.Laa CO� �• �rN.� O?w�'L <j�CT A^NO• �pO y�0 4'TL Q �pFL.tltlQ�J 6 ON CY yVy NFN •y �YN �$ U .UC6 dY NLwt YaYi�$LcY N�RCN q _�� VV UmG YCL �4 ^r »YV•!�>NCC NL ibvu r+>=> .� N >Y acq S^tlY .ate w�. 9 p P C CM4 U up �� ..•.. r�u$ Oa ., ww'=}�pg,ov`� Sc�• L tidreY� aC =L *'4ATo.A-4S `•M q�T NwcL=u etw'6UN wt of it cE 9X pq• Wit%-,p '2ja Yc. L' C 4 p ^ \ tS N SS r. r Y Y tl C U Y j.N 0.p'•O = o•L c {{yy YY NW UYO 6 a.^ . G Y V L tl Y b O W b r p C O Y U N d 0 yQ Y K y tl 6.tla•. p C Y� .r^,Y qOY 4NY• 9 X77=1ty Cr�0.4 CtlOCO �$c c vu�� >L �Bgoar S{u$`•..•o . U a< a�i�•O •p' Y N^ 'O.�A;q w C.G s•Y "tl•^ es�NN Lie p N U C YVO Y. mwL��nV o� Nw N.L•eir c ^a�L ' Gq Y Y ^ \I p Y y C y�•u v 9 C CC 4 4 U C�NN�zz C a .•.2a yy .G L G w�a^ Y±F np .� Y ��M6 Us. aE YC • CqA G CtwEY ^C'.�wRpa • y= G Ctl •^w Y tl �'M`p 3� W y�'Y�=op CGw^d1. p SN.p•,. G~YY qL wV-6 tlp4gC Na"L N{r N\I Y UY `q Nw0 UOV y$N tl N Y U T C• C p M w E p tl C C L tl v U.y g p o C CCCYW. 4 4 w`tz 9. Yr� �.Ew O Q V v q Ctl Y '\$ w atl L aZTp� '4p. „s 2 tl G.F P l C^a w G.q Y l`E YCL a 4 •�p `�C 9 O¢ 1p!•y�O:tl Y� V p p O^n. S w 6�1 N> O Y Y L V b •..L V It C C t\Y k N M..+ Nil y � 4L.ML pL tl Ca+ F 4 YG 1w� �LVwn = E I.xLiu C OO.00q—cif Ll P P g Y N ^� L 4 t C N o c—u Y L T?L 9♦ u • > <>p L6C }'tea O. NN y tlY �� 010 WO w0 'ciyrY + n• 09 O C C �.tVV 7+ MZz He r u VN YL �� Y du Nwu.�Na C (O N N C '• ...i•inb 1.7 NV&GR V A 2l V u >c w0 YYp.�,V�O ^4�a $ .^pU0 q0•� Cr W .� a� O.u+O NNO Yew pa uY CQ �NaF •O P±iy N�M q{ nNG Qu N91 F' Gq Q.Oau C b 'o„ "� @ o Nx aNG on tlw�N?A y.A R-tl c�Yr A. � y^ ccyyyyyyg e^: O1C C O N� �.^ YLY a �^C• 6t wy:` N O cO `V.. L 74f�i Yu0 pZ ^ 1.qO.M Cq NZ Ltt NlggN aY q ^ N A N Y Y C»V .V VO tY � 9Sa Pry wF OO n� tl� AO yL0 y�O1. C�YM EV. tiN,G N4�' TiC a Q Cy i. tC1 C Y L6 ^� w Oy ^ PwN L wCL OCYM YP Er I ONYL�YY >w.5,2 a Zl��pi '•L N �N �C D.L O. L 6 p M N Y r�O�r C Vp Y��q Y O1 �LL O b 0•V O u w Y _C N a C r N.•? M V P u C.Vi C N Q Y~ O w^q^ N= -a. u rqt`'EtiYP U �tlu �Q Pau.. C. � V.Y>6C '..� ,.."C"i LCY.tlM !Y + iN ...'•CpwOt^4OiV OUyA ..rc On0^� N>•N.tl 6 N 6N Z NO LNL IN Y.�^ate 01�M66 a•w��': !Y LL.O aPN y�7 ^tiP S OO. C 5�L}1u •a6¢ a+.�O Yc~ YZ q' uL •�4.C. N�^Y C CC C Y w Q Lpu Z M y^ s ("•C C AL_ yN'6 u.��^ Y ■q � Vy L.Lay av .2s • �� ^ �qt y� PO'� Yi PPN > o 6 y2..L.9 AoE" �'Y o Fvgrya G9 u.`o .w. .a Gc syw�Y n G CNMM aiJ ^y w^ tl ]:� 6Y Lt C� ^Pw^O CQYOC9 is ^ C„ » 4 2i •!N VO N� * �� qy�.a YLl E V Y Y±N� "' V^ 6 tl .Y. w L. O}u^i ^Y• C tY.0.� .w..C ii q E'C .Y.O � �Q � 9N N o„m„ C4q; 4LYw Y gp.ccYg cVa �u` vva =.L. s n� ^ Y►co av`Y'.o �.$ L'a°.N. any. ^"u •Ln� ` aY e's�o N� HYMN �wM`NY l Nw �N o e.�` v••,^Y �o�a^"o Y G 6 r y 6 L Oi =vwi^ N C L Y r �r N ^`G q nap qw4^ ` wCP.00 r P•1 CnyL Y� .[ ` .y P,LCEYE. O w 9, w `GC �V G�! wY. Y L 9 pp.rC- �C.00N^v O S .q- 4LO O r.` Y O C 4 C 9 q..0.pf.n lu N6 6nw.m > <CN 1 m -:G !V }.G F1'�`q !G6 9 -NJ- WGC�Na� Of ^b 1 Q � 4•f 2 • N _��A u'CTC _ 4N� ^M I7 y 9 N O^ y O V • r M 4 k- „ i.9 N A `.. 4q�p`4 4CVEC N E C 4 4 • Y O E U a„ L: CEE,,`U6 Y y V V 40 L"'C EE O w�Y €'O. w QO y.-� N4c emu•. •- .„i ^y`or CqN uuvy i 4„S�. `w oe YUV xO� UC2 4LG � MaCv�` Nwti Vd'V G pA � 7J hTw�i O�YZ C„LyE �...0 C^YY. 2•N4 ir� V.NVj• �w 0 gCg>4 ie`G il` N40 W p6 p Cti 0• yam. N Q -u4 'Z � r0�0 9�Qr.'• LLN 1+• tlY ��j' `.W� 3 aL {.l `• „ U ^ 4f`Y� 4 r Y0g9 gy`L�i q M.V � pN U de'w us,a a uY a`uo wm u y L Ns y v e k y my V q V 4 E.i y R •O N-W ` �q. 9 6 C` ^L C = y=A^ S_ �E.a• cy GCoC .^O4u u ey �tlgepry QY^`y o w� �� L.Ftl �V.<O•� �-.�u Y 2yF4 �~4.�Y .SIi�YE Vy AA 4�N CY qCL M 4Cr U CY C i•. EaY L q.. •�Q� -.YY -Ou 6' r-•- « Z �UMyY <a44L 0. r.?. y1r, ^✓VL N�C•4,♦ �^ 4 �Cy . �O CtloV .GV u_ p wC,^ F NSW Y'L q a�4�MV r ^c6 Nam= 6Yut� V wN ^L•eU Py y.O,.a. ,1'a.a4 a =L 3>'!�L i Up^ Vt?.3 V >• o '�^Y•+. wgS4$ve -ONy,dy l �„ ��kk•- qL Gy O...A -i ~�Vy ��f•C j•1L .y1w y�q. 9. y YN L d 6iY• YCC•O u_wVT YC�. YC4 S YvY- •.�•4 O y♦ y.•. i eVN HK F H [� Lo•-Y <G.3'L= ,'i LWNO AA N O 1^tJWL Yr.>11.IiN5 •- 4N . _. S r• C� Y•� .�i 6 C w F N 6 Q �Y Fr D'p s �L L f C e w • O m L OL • $y w G `G C V =6 Y� w]VU vQS � vAt 4- tlw 4 C y_N� _ at L� N6 wC t.y� Cr-y A nN VO ♦ L- �L? CY HQ `3 a 9 N Ab $pSF C� u �tl� � tli�C 4L poL C_ C p 4 4p Q6 54 Y.�V pL ► W4i• N N ' `Qc� _�A r''�SI '4V • = C.r� Oa ALY tlT O ij y`C n„ 9 �� L N Q Vint V4 ^L.D aN aO VpC 1 a o ... .g E F£ P - 6 Ot9 V -Le �. .♦>y iY 4y 4 1 Lit L R Y.W q N w-. G• p+i•' C Z9 O li �L.'12t • V NN�k7�k�•�� ay ^@Qb ^ �OYi�n `� ASV■ t`G Y'T L t^Y =C C•eO N•M 1�-T..C. ^ CCR�LT qga+ Ml L n0 ^_V.i. �P�!•� ry Y O�p•V M O 6N L4 � - �„ i4 =6 Map.. O�i 4•V q6qrr�� `rM iYaB ♦ OC•.r~ F �� M C �4 j CC\•y�� CC yy Y` Via„> c•,u -".� v'a e. ctl i ara 4mkn f�-ativ u••• a.on yu^d p Y u 9r -< O1^C n• tl 6 O M g r kJ E Ep Y 6'- M 4L pC aC 'J OYN Y EO ��-, >yiO l�Z M.-tl- QC.O QV.Nw C WY.. W I �4VV ~' Ir O V_� ��Y l..•O y.LOW 4�V A R � y S V L4.Dp C aL. YOaQ rS.10 »G4J 2 � D y >q.S MC �EEEy CC wy'$ L YY W C Y a+. 4` 0 d y Y. 0• �V J y . •r7 gwq.`^ AY O o...C @ L'M'a Y r �c�p Cl- at aiq.C� NODO_m b Yfa'k L O % � O C" C RCS CO dwO i kJ n yy G u u 4D. DAa+ pNiM YgGVyVYjO 4 . y C.` O 4 J� � oY. y � uyN�s's AV T=�d GOo OC41puy Off' y.p .++MV a N pg ■`i C L'll4 Y N 1 .a, L YY L F 4 ._..n pCar 11 Gwyi Y Y L iJ Lead ri .YiL f u.m KOQ aw a > is 'yyyy. i �i CpL.� Yv. O O 7f Ci e J � G 9 N 4 m C Pw .Ee `C y6 Y R "ZY Gwtn T wN L Cod ad 0.6 YrT ._ 5:5 V4 C V NO LAQv_y Y N�YN. �Y y N�NC >•N .�i Gpp �R� AbNy YqN� �LJ� � V L w L t Y L 44 •6 O 0Lp Y N .Cp 1�. ■ art 9 Np. C q wLcc V pu b.� qp 9 Y L L i rY FLiyu A.Di u` 04M N .. "CYL` NLYK it nq�i Ny V QO�` C.COO vC 42 u.` NYCY L` G ' p'C rpC NOwaL fr �.yy I G` y4y[n Y . 4GVNOAr4`, .O vab �L 2f OmM� LY qSR M Aty *VYiy+ Spa A rlL CcYA��4 G q SX '� N H Y C N.ti f C i O Cl 6�L6 L C u t bO V M A Yr=. w 4M4 R„Y YGDJ �6 N~�QL <r=+ <O .0 IFMM Mill! 0 9 2,18 81"' "P,C, A#onn- N cc O 9 p � ..u� iaq Nc Lou ..,rN- $ `0 3 q4$ •�.` a a.a uan oy. 2 a `a S¢ u O Y A �C-p fJ NV- u3 L E y E' Z-2 nc v Lc c N p'au co d yeuis cd 4a l �i Pr syb pY = o^ ra— JEr uq �.� w' u� sy .dam m+ YyaA u•' o_ y. Ot W .::�. Uy LC aL y t� � N Y C O d U UA y • 4 9 �'. yy not 4 Y V 6•rY KV 6.. WuwL VV. 12L S', Kwo• ^ H C CY 4 '•V rN�W I i ��I. ��• C N ^ � I I I G �n=ern Ya s M � o ra ° E2Mi LQ L v c �>N N Li R. �• y C Y7 L- Y VYlu c,Y W i e�e. vCcN Y ^L --¢ CYU. r �.V. L y4 6M ¢-C.9= �NQ 7� ^r Ng0 � 4iq!Y CN � �•�' .Y C' e. Is $^ ,•f.2<2 ,vy� and 4 Rw o'EM 4L MN NV= ,64 O • YQ?� YQ CqL R.� 3.N O,4 • L� •�.<^. W N ►. Ya .�> UT.4O Sq Y- Y A 1y j V �6j i� p t4 aC� �11�CL �4^Y • 4A_J O L� C+N W. yCL L Y.TL W 1 U V CL V W VI-y U_Y LYO1V U YLP ^ Yy.� RW.UC ®yy K • 1�I� N �I �` � W ® '4 Nv . WI W 4 i i a ;I o z: a-+ I t� •n o i a i °4oy 'f y�Y yEyE YL L pu� ' C L1N ey • L Y y UE00. .+CN � N y 4 LYC YON O C CY CCCCCU Rq �� V r \tC ^�- 3 M pr f n Y6L `q^ 4Y N �Ew q'u Y o,Y bLA w YYN L Y i .Oiry AO. � a a= Y L t ^ a4 eL i6p w a�' « "L' m mho 'gnu C G w Y. C ^r q 9 `V mbYva.. -s j^ ra 1 ^� aY.LV b �Y Y. G tlN 4b Y Vw Y Y C� L O bN t N 9 u C [) .-.�LY NR NM LL NO�aw 1 w u SOV r'r,'•' N'C �� N4 .� C OV.OA T YV i.V qY _�L �Er LC GS' ZLY\ w.Lr4 ��' VNC�Y S 4Y GG d.�LM ^L Y"E y�M ^�^b Y cc Aak V Y 4 S sr s Vpp^C G y...NY Er 4(1Y aw tE CL.N.Y..N 9. 66 F C LADY OLD LLt- YaaU = aJti t] Za4 FNA �90 N � Y R O 6 r! /`� - '�� v�1, ` �, go-,°,:, �{ . ,,; _ ; £, 1 ,s 2' t t,. �� i I I 1I "�.. .�..,. 'I.�',�.,Y. ,-�:�, ��.. M t ' CITY OF RAINCHO CUCAIIIONGA STAFF REPORT G�oCuC+M"�'� k O O U > F DATE: September 24, 1986 1977 p TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Howard Fields, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13342 - UNNON -' The deve opment of 8 s?ng e- ami y etac e" oI-i -mes on 11.46 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 du/ac), located at the northeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street - APN: 202-191-13, and 23. In additions the applicant has requested a Tree Removat.�Permit to remove 17 Eucalyptus trees. r I. <)ROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: i A -tion Requested: Approv11 of the Tentative Tract Map, I elevations,and issuance of �1 Negative DeLlaration. 1111 B. Project Density: 5.9 dwelling units per acre C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning.: North - Existing single-family residencAs, Low Residential (2-4 du/ac). South - Vacant and existing single-family residence, Low Residential (2-4 du/ac). East - Exis`,ng single-family residence, Low Residential r (2-4 au/ac). West - Existing condominium development Tract 11625 and Tract 1081, Medium Residential (8-14 du/ac). D. Gercral Plan Designations: Project Site - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 du/ac) North - Low Residential (2-4 du/ac) South - Low Residential ("4 du/ac) East - Low Residential (k-4 du/ac) West - Medium Residential 0-14 du/ac) ITEM G ea ipLARIiING C ? +1�SSIOn7� PORT September 24,, 1986 7 TT 13342 - Pannow. C gag8 2 G >i E, Site Characteristics., ; The project site slopes from north to i south at approUmRfe 3% and is covered with native grasses, 1 low lying shrubs, and a re�«nant Eucalyptus windrow which r tranverses`Che site in an east/west direction. The "Outparcel'" on Hermosa:,contains the ruins of a former residence destroyed by fire. The applicant master planned this parcel pinto the overall site aalan to allow.full development in the future (see f : attachod letter).. A Tree Removal permit and Arborist Report was filedby the applicant which identi-fies 17 Eucalyptus trees slated for,removal.. (See Seetlnn F. Applicable Regulations; Csa3ic and dptional standards of the Low a ium asi en 1,,(d District W4 8 du/ac) set forth under Section 17.03,U4OB &C of the Development Code. II. BACKGROUND: 0n August 22, 1984, the subject site was reeiewktid by the Pla 9 Commission as part of the 14th Street Corridor Study. As a result of the Corridor Study, the isolated 'office designation on t1a southern half of the project site was finally designated ao� Low Medium Residential, thus bringing the entire 11.46 acres under one land use designation, 1II. ANALYSIS: j A. General: The developer is proposing, a private in-fill residential development utilizing a small lot subdivision design under the optional standards of the Low Medium Residential District (4-8 du/ac), The proposed subdivision will create lots ranging from 2,441 square feet to 7,860 square feet situated around a 28,000 square foot central open space area. Four residential lots averaging 7200 square feet are plotted along the eastern tract boundary under the basic standards of Lois-Medium Residential providing a transition of density and final completion of "stubbed-out" streets, Heather- Street and Ring Avenue with proposed Street "A". The proposed Street "A" provides a physical separation of land uses and completion of the area circulation pattern to allow efficient ingress and egress for the existing single-family neighborhood to the east, theniby alleviating traffic congestion at the only point of ingres,; and egress for the neighborhocd onto 19th Street. ' PLANUING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT September 24, 1986' TT 13342 - Pannon Page 3 { The project addresses several constraints affecting the overall site design-. The major issues are as follows: P, o Trans'tion of pihsities: The project provides our standarcU sTO residential lots of an average 7,200 square, fe-at along the eastern tract boundary to interface with existing single.-family lots of similar seize. This transition from Low-Mediuv to Low Residential pro0 des a measure of neighborhood compatability and is consistent with the y absolute policies of tiie Development Code. 'o "Outparcel"s The "Outparcel" on Hermosa was master panned into the site design isee Exhibit "E"). The proposed site design shows the internal loop system terminating inco a ` cul-de-sac. The d_veloper has entered into negotiations , with the property owner, Mrs. Laurel Hawker, over the purchase of the t ' "Outparcel". Also, agreements are in place with the property owner for easement dedication �. along Hermosa Avenue. Acquisition of the "Outparcel" could create four additional lots, complete the internal .loop road system, and contribute 3 850 square feet to common open space. o Nox%therly Parcel: The developer has agreed to Ii.up o• 13 and provide access to service this parcel to the north (see Exhibit "N") The future Foothill right-of-way dedication will require the loss of Finch Avenue (30 foot dedicated half street), which is presently in unimproved condition and a substantial portion of Parcel 1 and 2 under separate ownership (see Exhibit "N"). The developer has entered into negotiations for the purchase of Parcel 3 (see attached letters). The City Engineer has reviewed the situation and determined that access to this parcel is acceptable as proposed. The developer has agreed to allowing future residents on Parcel 3, the use and enjoyment of recreational amnenities and access through the gated community (Tract 13342). �4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT September 24, 1985 TT 13342 - Pannon Page 4 r B. Design Review Committee: The Committee reviewed and h recommended approval or Tfre project subject to the followilig revisions that the developer has agreed to provide: 1. Open non-viewing obstructing rear yard fencing adjacent to open spacer, (i.e. wrought iron fencing) with access gates. 2. Minimum 20 foot corner side yard setbacks as measured from curb or, Lot 17, 18, 54 and 58. 3. Consolidate Lots 17 and 18 into one lot with 1 access from the we3t side of lot. 4. Provide side and rear elevations for all units. 1 ' S. Provide gentle curve in north-south street by varying lot depths of Lots 19-26, 5. Break up rhythym of driveways by varying placement-on dots (i.e. do not always P;tace on same side of lot). 7. Widen pedestrian connections to open space from street. In general, the Committee determined that corner lots should be larger in size to provide greater setback from street and create a more open feeling. Therefore, the Committee recommended certain lots be consolidated and 20 foot corner sideyard setbacks be provided as noted above. However, the Committee was sp'iit on the issue of consolidating Lots 54 and - 58. Further, the same condition now exists on Lots 12 and 14 where the ;tub street to the north had been provided. On all three cor►iers in question, the 10 foot setback will only provide for 5 feet of landscaping bftween the sidewalk and the f house. C. Technical Review Committee: The Committee recommends approval su sec o all existing overhead, utilities being undergrounded along Hermosa and 19th Street as a condition of development and all off-site drainage facilities determined necessary by the final hydrology and drainage report be constructed as approved by the City Engineer. Further, the Committee recommends a knox box be installed at every entrance gate, including the recreation area. Lastly, the cul-de-sac at the end of the private street should provide Fire Department turn around as noted on the development plans. L PLANNING COMMiISSION STIFF REPORT September 24, 1986 TT 13342 - Pannon; ; w,. Page 5 ) D, Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the app leant. Staff has conducted a field investigation and completed Part II of the Environmental 1 Checklist and •has determined that the development of the subject site would expose people and property to water related hazards such as flooding. However, this has •been mitigated through construction of -a five foot high flood wail along,the Hermosa Street frontage. (see Exhibit %-1"). The final hydrology and drainage report will be required and identify all M appropriate off-site drainage facilities necessary to mitigate c flood related hazards. According to the City`s Master Plan Drainage System, Hermosa Avenue will carry a significant amount of surface runoff from upstream properties. t. _ In addition, the subject site may expose people to adverse levels of noise. A Acoustical Study will be required to identify appropriate measures to mitigate any adverse noise contours that transverse the project site. Per the General' Plan, exterior noise levels must be reduced to 65 dba (CHEL) or less. Interior noise levels must be reduced to tiie City's criteria of 45 dba (CNEL) by use of special construction � tec,lniques and building materials identified in the Acoustical Study. It is anticipated that approximately 680 trips per day will be generated by this development. Using, trip generation factors 'h of 10 daily trips x 68 units, development of this site under r the LM District standards would increase the anticipated daily traffic counts to approximately 680 trips (68 units x 10 daily ja trips). As appropriate mitigation, the developer will be required to pay a systems development fee, which will be used i; to further improve and signalize the intersection at 19th Street in the near future. E. Tree Removal: The appliG..tt filed a Tree Arborist Report and TreeRemoval" Permit (see attached) which discusses aspects preservation and/or removal of 17 Eucalyptus Globulus (Blue Gum)„ Those trees slated for removal exhibit crown dieback, root loss, second regrowth, and decayed tissue, etc. However, as required per Ordinance 37, those trees removed from the project site will be replaced on a one to one basis, with Eucalyptus Maculata (15 gallon), (see Exhibit "I" for tree locations). t PLANNING 4XMIIISSION STAFF REPORT N Septei,ber 24, 1986 TT 13342 - Pannon Page 6 i +•r. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The site plan and elevations, together with the recommesi a conditions are in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Development Code, General Plan, and City Standards. The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant adverse impacts dur' to storm drain facilities which will be:provided to dispose of s,.rface runoff and systems development fees used to mitigate traffic impacts. V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item: has been advertised in The:Daily Report newspaper asa public hearing. Notices were sent to all proper y owners within 300' of the project site advertising the public hearing. In addition, a neighborhood meeting was held on August 19, 1986 to discuss aspects of the project proposal. The major concern expressed by residents living on Ring Avenue was regarding the additional traffic generated through Ring Avenue and Heather Street (sae attached letter). VI. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission r approve Tentative Tract 13342 through the adoptiop ^f the attached. Resolution and Conditions and issuance of a NegatV' eclaration. Res ctfully/�s itted, Arad Bui1er City Planner � BB:HF:dak Attachments: Letter from Nortoculturist Letter from Neighborhood Meeting on Augur+ 19, 198E Letter from Mrs. Hawker _ Letter from Mr, George Douglas Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "D" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "C" - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "D" - Natural Features Map Exhibit "E" Site Plan Exhibit "F" - Landscape Plrn Exhibit "G" - Grading Plan Exhibit "H" - Elevations Exhibit "I" - Tree Removal Permit Exhibit "J" - Entry Details Exhibit "K" - Recreation Building Elevations Exhibit "L" - Miscellaneous Details Exhibit "M" - Streetscape Exhibit "N" - Northerly Parcels/Foothill Freeway R/W Initial Study Part II Resolution of Approval with Conditions r,. -24 'l TREE S'tRV10E ComPiets Arboricultura;''Fvleea I` 1 ' 4� ",• REPORT FOR PANNON DESIGN & DEVELOPEPI-, INC.: 23277 Ventura Blvd. Woodland Hills, CA 91364 m OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING TREES AT: ' HERMOSA PLACE TRACT # 13342 M PREPARED BY SAMUEL L. KNAPP KNAPP TREE SERVICE JUNE 27, 1986 :x. s '* Riverside(714)688.6043 Licensed Contractor#481825 ram? `' *-�•.,,„ P.O.Elox 8796 Riversides,California 92515 R7RPi u F le,t i 1 7-�881fi 1 Aca RE; Preservation requiremeixts of the treg6 with?Ln Hermosa Place, Tract #13342. �.y The trees are� principally Eucalyptus globulus blue^ ( gum) windrow remains . . struggling for existence with the vicissitudes of nature, coupled with . increasing people pre+iaure. The collective adverse environmental conditions, . results in crown diebick, root loss, wounds, decay, and second regrowth creating poor branch attachment and structure. In my opinion, the Lucalyptus trees should be removed with respect to overall health and longevity. .,he fruit trees are functionally dead and would be prudent to remove. The two 2 O palms, Phoenix canariensis (Canary Island date palm) and, HashinRtonia filifera (California faa palm) and the Bauh inia (orchid tree) • would warrant preservation. There is fire damage to both palms which need cleaning for aesthetics, but does not create a major problem wV.t respect to trunk failure. The trees have good frond color and size which directly relates to overall environmental adaptability. The Bauhinia (orchid.tree) would function well as multi-trunk shrub/tree with corrective py. .ing. Avoid disturbing soil environment and maintain trees within a natural format. .'r4 t . ♦ r i'Zjx� � r '" Cea. .+.w.:'s'ti'S sa. ...k..e.a..ow'.1.r:.:+...,n` _... —�+.•.N+r.-«. .« , '�n`��:nr'_ � 5....`.P'••� .- _ . e_ .,.. �. E'RESERVATI4N REQUIREMENTS F'CR MATURE TREES C, I. Corrective pruning to specified standards for tree preservation in urban development, (Certified Arborist preferred) 2. Establishment of undisturbed soil zone around tray bases, set at a 12:1 ratio of soil sur=ace width to potential trunk �4 diameter. t `` 3. Clearing of all vegatation and installation of wood chip mulch � . on a needed basis, retention of all natural leaf canopies. litter beneath 4. Where soil has been compacted or ot)—rwise disturbed in the root zone area (particularly under canopies), fertilization, aeration, watering via soil injection r% all accesible soil in the root zone. x15. Installation of irrigation systems with capacity for periodic deep 1._tering, during-and after development. 6.:''..Insta, kation of chain link fencing to protect trees during development of the area. 7. Examination and documentation of each tree, with specific maintenance/-preservation recommendations. ' 8` Transmittal of recommendations ane specifications fur con tinuing tree maintenance to parties responsible for tree and landscape management on completion of 'area development. • .... f r.x fit^ .• � )f'" 06 •�d5t+.a.>"n. �:w'[i-.++. .-+c't��x'�4;"'w`..t..... •A 4:. -- :S".f..T' i�? Yty � . i'.fi(F: k i STRATEGIES �FOR MINIMIZING LIAIMITY R1SKS hhA L ' RE: All E ,rees that are to be preserved o CONCERNS: A. Aging urban forest' B. Grovrth of suburbs C. Environmental factors Strategies: A. Annual inspection by qualified tree specialists B. Avoid crisis management C. Establishment of systematic maaagement ',l�l 'D. Apply arboricultural principals E. Documentation • � t a ..tY.•.fr« ♦i�..{ifN '3h�'.•��RI••ri� .� .Wfa°iBtC•i.i .•+ •.• a r. ' r e PANNON Design & Development, tnc. r usus t .^.1, r 986 --,RECEIVED-- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA KANNIAG DIVIV04 t1r. Howard Fields Ci 1 Y Or Rzncho Cucamonga AU r w 5 1980 g] +nning Division AM PM i trte Rra.d, Suite G '�l8�3[aUtlll [ 1�l8l1l6 r�anrho I;Lcamenya, CA 91'.7"_'O Rer TentaLiv= Tract 13342 yn431;1ruritoad yt'atina � I Present: Pctar fl. Laden -- Pra,non bectign & Aeveropmerttt Tr.:. Dan Guerra -- Derbish, Guerra & Associates Jack Causey Subject property Owner Neighboring Residents Fallowing is a report regarding the public Neighborhood Meeting held an Tuesday, August 19, 1906, 7p111 at the 1_ionr, park Community Center Forum Room: There were eleven (11) people isigned list enclosed) who attended and were in one way or another concerned about then proposed Map and product far this tentative tract. ,lifter a brief introduction and explanation of the planning and architecture by Pannon representative, patar M. Laden„ the pubiic were invited to postr an/ questions tar . concerns. There was no opposition to the pc''cjert in general, however two major concerns were expressed by some of the residents living on Ring Avenue regarding the additional traffic that will be generated through Ring and Heather Avenues. A proposition was presented by these residents to introduce A cul de sac on the end of both of these streets. Petar Laden explained that this was the first land plan propoamd by Fannon early in pebruary and *rejected by City Engineering Department due to the fact that the length of the Proposed cul de sac would greatly exceed city permissablp standards. There were also some Concern about the projected pricing of the homes, which would, in the view of some "nepreciate" the value of their property. It was explained that the difference in price of their, homes and 161le proposed project i, mainly reflected through the lot 'sizes; their`s being 7,000+ verses 41000 average in Hermosa Pace; public streets verses private streets and homeowner -Fees. 23277 Ventura Boulevard 9 WoodiGrTd Hills, Call famta 91364 0 (818) 703-7106 u V �r } Page Two } HdWard Fields : August 21, 1986 There were no fuPthen questions And the Jaeetittg gdjaurnad atapproximately 8:45 P.M. Respectfully sub,,' ttedy PANNO NI DESIGN! txt< DEVELOPM N T, INC:. etAr M. Laden PrQ' ident Enclosure cc:- File Dan Guerra PML/vab I. DER91SH GUERRA&ASS.. CIATES, INC. J0A ..^.. .__. Civil Enalmers SHEETNO, OF 8331 Utica Avenue Rancho Cucamonga,CA 81730 CALCULATED BY_. DATE-- _ (714)987-4306 CHECKED ay DATE G' - SCALE JAY S.Z nJnl&L f— 16.2gv gI,j.G) 10 I �-^ fi ►et7 M C,,gl¢LA Vfi f/ �+`S sfj!�'C / O-F-4-Y IV ? # I 1 —r„ s� . ATT! F; CY-5 s is\N n.It.C• _. .. .. ll 77u5(,.s i.:.f.LInN ti.Tg5.E Y.. TCtC v.lDv2 al!/•75'.2 UAM-11 I GI:C's\MONi:r\,.VAI-11`11-.'XTA Petar ,r. Laden PANNON DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT, !NC. 2 Ventura Boulevard ind Hilts, CA 91364 RL: Parcel 0202-191-14 My Client: MISS LAUREL HAWKER i Property Add ess: 6655 Hermosa ,venue, Alta Loma, California Dear Mr. Ladan: I have reviewed -,our June 4, 1986 correspojrdance to my c_:ent, Miss Lauzel Hawker. She is under the impression that your second proposal in y the letter is incorrect in that her previous understanding was you would be will:nq to purchase a portion of the eastern area o:her property. If that is the case, please advise and give Re some idea concerning you: proposela terms. With respect to Proposal XII, my client will agree to dedicate eleven. (111 feet of her property to the city for the improvements of widening Ker-mosa Avenue if you agree try pay for all associated costs, including the improvements to the property. My client wishes to maint-ain access f "om her property to nermosa Avenue and understands that you will i:tclude the cost of driveway facilities onto Hermosa Avenue from her property in the improvements which you make. In addition, bliss Hawser does have a concern regarding the flooding of Hermosa Avenue. Her present rock wail is, a pproxmately five and r,ne- half (5 1/2) feet high. She would like you to provide a wall which is. approximately the same height as the existing wall .3o that there will not be any flooding problems onto her property. If Yoe nave any questions regarding r t e for., hesitate to conzact me. i, g, please do not Very truly yours, EMOrORE & BROWNS L .. BROWN 1.. LB:pim ceo Miss Laurel Hawker a Mr. George Douglas and fait° Herman Douglas ' 10151 and 10123 Finch Avenue Alta Loma, California 9170i f September 12, 1986 Mr. Howard Fields Planning Division City of Rancho Cucamonga P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Private Access from Prppossd Tract 13342 Dear Howard, We are pleased that our appeal for access from the proposed tract 13242 has been atedp possible thrr4gh cooperation from Pannon Design & Development, Inu. in deleting one of their lots. We understand th orivate nature of access from tract'13342 and realize that certain cop itlons of the CC&R's cf said tract will require sori a obligations as well as provide some benefits for the future 'lomeowners on our parcel of land. W have met with Mr. Petar Laden, President of Pannon Design & Develop- Oent, Inc., on several occasions and ara in the process of negotiating the sale of our property to Pannon for development. We hope that this transaction will soon be complete and are pleased that Pannon will be a buyer - the most logical developer for our property. We would like to thank you personally and all stafr members for their sup- port and understanding in our metter, "ricerely yours, org oug as erman o6 u Tas 9 ��y v. ►�a w.n.v E� a �w^e� =�.=■r��y�!.. t _. .---•-- ten. ;a �•- .t I�a_ .a.■■R�_. u� �� ter.......« � � -� �■«y__.i i� �_��M•Y, N"Yw�Y LL. ��1♦ L ,: ir. Y � �� yMY ■ os LM ■ NORTH CITY OF ITC-m-- low- PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: '�4 r 1.+ •., {r"F t+4[�tN-ni„S4 1fF:t tt'+'t e.e•+• _- IF`. TZx � L., .Q �•'W^^' 'S.Y.�.5�, IaFd,(,, t .'FT f�1+�k�L.,,*+}•t-� `�4� -�%• {„-1•�qz f ��''y'j"��r Y� i+7 �u 7.�` t(`!1 �6,�.au a+,.�;�i )' }t Yv+ ( " `�h� Zfl'�^fi � 13� rj t ��rl' .��_',�•v3[...+l l{r Sll tiro. fh ice+-•'��tEti`y'� F� tf' 'WF"+� yt�, f 1.. Q,(.r'•! `t`'+7' ..7�f ...�.,+fin,,��..t�� };. �jn t3 t , ✓; v( r•-'.� c5 }1 rq �+`.. �rC• 'tl�' t l Or f�fL7..-'� +t��1 yf t- �`ri�"j}.�'�u I JI 1F "t��S��---•. '' fig. ~��1 ) .. ..C,rrRo"errr � ` F -t•.r`�i1`a'�}��,c p.'Z�r./ _ 'i` redratrve i ' .V I b. ' f i� '" �5{c�Tai . 2 w' _ TRACT%33t2 + �J,� �:1 3 {ta f�'C}'Tit w ' Lt oot,onal ON., �r1"�C r }-t1��r= dl7't ri{jr 116� y enmtas ( (I��,�r��; �•-''f:3_f ,t J,5�qt.� { 2o' ilfra�eruFzrrra Lr-j 7 ate e$" ! ,I�'7 t L�rn.ar>..r �:}1 F ( � 1L'�L{.•��,�rf'•- �:��.� '� u.,�...+a {� :Ye :c ��" 41?t'.''.N�.rEfE111 6! Ell, R- q� t� ;; bv • F"yl r2 t' t�� t,�14> �t °4yd ate ^ _ • '�7�f ti tu,'tx. IRA` � �� 3'a_t•' :.a. q�a �..'".�..r m'E J ;V��.�j,�,t��.`��!��:�{"`�.a 3,p��(+.'- -�il''ff'1�' .� ' ��tl -�f +-k-�" ��Z sp{ °�l$•,,�.Ti-;'9p�� £ ��,' ��.�'�'#"��ji"'��tiY�lY1�S�{`t i�17��1 ., -"+ �.r-cy �" � •'+7 t� 9Oi. 6't�.t. ��!'�,,.� e... �•�s"`JSVu---. � rti,,. -tl -��:i,� ��. •,`••f� i^ �i ern• •F a+^�+'a r }l }i T4' .im�= ' e•4, 5* T r. ..+.. �y! U� 'jaA X.Ili X AtsWaN...,.. '`.d.�4�t tS rr+. i."� R.9.,,l ri •�'�' ` ' p ,.1 ,,tw}4,�t"�.�ri�/,�`.' J'✓j.`it'+.�. site Utilization Mai _ NORTH �..y� crr �'T ITE�if— � d335�� 2�1�,CHO CL7 IVZO\' A TITLE. 3.7Z trT,G,e a rt77 PLANNING DIVISIONd• "L3" �, ElHii3IT: SG1LG 41 1G a t E ti 1 1113 7gy „ .w ,.r •� .i 12 q. ii� ."' L a 46 S .iIII . `� ,�� ,,, i i t f t��t ts• t q�i�. at l:� a� Il` �� •' .y».9 a � z a r .ft t!t� -.i �.� i �40, � ) tt � i� at, � W •� 6/S� - ),�tl�t'))f111�. ��tY.if 1 t � z�..3t, f •�� 7}{.R �� V4eT ry I J r t 1: + hr `.+iY* �3vreEG r �FUTUft La M T� � fi✓ , 'L r"at I i Jt ^"`t'-�. �� :it i •� Ott fa' ,.Z-- t; 1 ^.• _ �.:,•. •.. �_•Ij1 '�,,,f .; 1 -;�„t w1ar•t.l.' f: �F � 1 +j 1 ;. f , �t' ; I ra 1• - � �,t4 z s ,!t/. .. z EJ1l�_�.t.�� I t•PftA'RE, STHE@'1•. jy{ d � ` f••. —,"-t: y �_x��- •• :r;x -t---C=� i"' ENi' ` ATI1/E TRAC i' 13349 TENTATIVE'TRACT 1A.r"F; NORTH clrl� OF T T ITEM: RAINCHQ CUCAlVION"GA TITLE- 32-177 PLANNING DIVISION 6-19, EXHIBIT. SCALD A -�_— _----•—.—,.ram_ .. ,..r...,..�..•w,m•—,..»�.n.--aEd�e—._, f — '/ C7�--#� � r 3f t f • .. y ) '• / f Mai y, �'' ?r:r'I� II ..�� •. .' . • � f j `lfRfEY 1 , CROSS .1RE4. •1l,Ri.l=fn,•CCJrnd J AMA Oi A fte ROMi :l...f.��:...s..•-.�.- .1 � yI .:NIRER rmrr"`t�.e..�r. '7�in��- &1, ra..�..up�:�i:.. -.{f.�.�--�_^�-T"l.•-�- ��r��.�.�. _ � STREET -r �-�[.'�,:..A.__- .wrrn�. - t, tlaturalJFeatures M--gD . G •CITY NORTH - Qr ITEG�t: 'fir/3.3i�� RANCHO CUCANIONGA TJTLLt ��e ,�.��-��E� PLANNING DIt'ISION _/� EXHIBIT AG S�,P, +1f #� v j�S•�r A 1 i ' '' r'. 4 1 i S�ii111tt11 ea q�I •�4� 1S'�*��.�'L'� Ir J Y , '!• it• rl1 w l•• I lL r_ - 11EATNEfl St Jas 21ew ` t� " �.».y.., r y'x 40• � >< ' f lA '�'� a ae I ��S�t. .'.SST Y ., 4 -"j ,` 1 :_ ;;:t� =i 1 ►Tilwa+sr�a� i Lo .y.,..-I..--. �4fT 1 40 • 1 1 i �i^^..f'�..I I 4. 1. [Rf� IN6 AV •••—•�—•l � NINFsLRR'una '•� �' ��iftE I � —DETAILED-SITE.PLAN— NORTH CITE.' OF ITEM: RANCHO CUCANIONYGA TITLE:- srp,� �c j PLANNINC DIVISION E` t{It31T= ~fir, -, ----._.SGAt.G i 1 �LG,5 ; ho ' _ NEAlItER,y'T, � t w ELI IR Yj -._.. LANDSCAPE PLANT UST., +rry • TREES •.�'�_.� .,, .—. _ .,.� SHRUBSt� e.ev" JVMIS 'LAWN40 CITY Or, �I�•�, • 1\UIiTH RANCHO GU& 1WONGA TITLES fr.S►�/lsSC.9,�r�6� ��9r✓ PLkINTNl\G D! sloN i f 1 A��ss b i{u ' rCl i `,:J a:t'r'J`.t„�••� �.� 4�'+.,:,�j� �.�r'7. f� .,R7 e ,�.1 =t�i a `'� 1�!! r �-ta+\ t' �� ,•N4�1�'� i t'i l�'" '1+t �' r�`+s•� '�i� ]PEUAI� �n �.Jw,d t � .w ..i r s �t.ai� •�...n . • �> i�j( `t ••..•-ra3• ' `V�1��••�/ r'1+�,f4�'1� ;:�� ,�iS � =1 s � � :r'r....n t .,.:-:--4 ti�" '�� <. Sa Y �v�+4•-.,'.f� Fz �a-t•�_i ''ii. �,,,�t �. `. �f F t .. cl l I •>I . r��`� \ f STREET t _ U:f;END • SA = �t �.Y !t,( � �. ♦�, i� � E t ° i J( ; .................,. _t ys YR Berl 4 ti< ��✓�� Ilx� t f` �,�' i t t .1(�' �. ' "� t..w v t.,...t,,..... ° ae foal. aT))�M7t. `! �-.1.• � t.n r.:.\.'r {1 -i...a•t S' ilk �/lF""ii _ t: 1 �` .1•hT r , 't 4.�i� '�.� If, t +t 'n. w _ � .,L " ; ,,� r YI<. r 1 { *� •AVENU It11 - ENU E In ` . . "ta� �a .��i''. r a�.�"`f�{rl" r.'•c:»'b Y R��•.`'��1 a� a i } ItF{ � +�.u.a, � �� •�:L. '7�- ��•...i� O'4�t'"t° r �• ,!, ti�l "`""�r'r.`3..:1 "ir'd ?w..C•_� � -�•i2 dF`e�t� •2.�._.ti��•.Y= r + ..,..t-..��. r�t '_ _�,.NINETEEN1Fi - a.�i�1- irl t•'� z��s+" -4+= .-_TEI1'CATIVE TRACT 1334.2 CONCEPTUAL GRAQCNG PLt _ FORTH CITE' OF 47 RAINCHO CL'CA MU`.*GE1 TITLE- ]PLANNING DIVISION.r -- J. t= � Ie�¢tt ttNroy I . HEHANA AVENUE ll'rL NINETEENTH STREET I i • F t....L,t ..W • �-tea!!-i�.i9".s 4� •-��..,_ f�� i rRwnrE trr�ua,ecna� . STREET 'A' ..ra, • V V FORTH CITY OF ITE,NI. 33s�-z RANCHO CUCATIONOtt TITLE. SWe-71 L� 5 PLANNING DIVISICON EXHIBIT s r a•1at2�I�^Fp,� ,,. y�� rsx r �.. 1. . r. fll KENN oerei i� PLAM.A. rt�•. 'bIM NM r �i •• r sue. .. :11-� !MEN" ill•'• 1- j� 35.�"� ^ K �+5��J�.,• _ �}-��Ia•.��.,12 •� tNmi.MlMn1 L 1 Il [rrtr[ 1 �Il . 13 I ri El usmn ue i r an y`aGAA1 NORTH CITY OF ITENI: —;;Ir s 2 RAINCHO lei.lrC?.lYlONGA "rrrL.E=-AE7e6-e1,y iy PLANNING DIVISION �_�� EXHIBIT- f r M- 1 PL - F .t�.� . l t1 t :-At CITY OF ' I\U1UH R�.i�'.CHO CLTCA�110iG.�. PLANNING DIVISION "- �s• �. I it�Ss tip: i. + Nf..� _ --� �,�+St.tit�t•4„•,P. r.: .'r i 'ate t a►raaaa w i -- ---- ------ t tnAN 6, i • t v "Ils11N 1411C1CM , •�. uwrir � I. 1 ' I = � I INiIM`.rMil .I-. IC.) i t„.illc L D.i v.In i�IN, I...1.• � I ' _-___• _1 �_ I ....�.. i^ '.4- .meµ I t I Of eA NolU ki CITY Or TZ.``a1C -10 CU11(IUG. TITLE-ZC�l.4T<dtr'S PLANNI`:G DIVISION 6 :26 E1HII3IT----� SCALE 1 h�rl'�n+v'd��a �. �� •, ' .,ij��p' )�'' ��^.1 ,k. M Crt+ �A ..,,. `)�..,r 1�It'tit ii�'�I -_� S,4` {a�( Y , ofL�a Ih t�.L_F� — ■.■ 4 '1l.D o s 1`i Ul{ t'h�� I� •� �f;ra: .. �,� }'' '2.�{ n;�{ ii'"- J.� ■r� - ;.ten.. �� ,^XR�r L j 0 � [`�'i�\It � •'��I:��I.rrrrs�ii�T'"_.�^ � 1, — r . 1/� _ �' 1 '} r l nr. a an®...PLAN tso. ;a i•�II f � --r'-\\•'t' it�i,` ��c.��e��.: ems, I— M+,liR 11111�itH1 � I 1 INIII I ' �, Ill In l•yi�ll 1 �C Ilhl'h: III/sh AI�S'I,Y 1 ul.jl I14t1 ` CITY or NORTH ITEN I. TITLE: LEA PLAIVNUNG DI`'IS[O\t ;a f t ' � _1=LLA1�_�-�e,oa avn.a .•t}.:.:e.�. t 9 ` l • a tj 7 LAI i NORTH CITY Or -7-, RANCHO (�[ (�,�- �{�-y� (� ITEM is� 33 Ste? O l+l�pl dy l�LVi\rdJ TITLE- ,c��S►r ,�C �l?io�(s Pi VNti`:G DIvISICv - EXHIBIT: �" SCALr. �a �r �•is� � P ERR Ems 1.fC1 dr c Si111i Iry— rift ❑ am uktN•• ...•.w..+ x.a -j fC+•�"��• �r,•~ L it a �=�+ � ]HIM YYY!!i _ _ f m�jx��l..rr .�,» ._t,'fix, '�'•�^s �:P.`'+c. ,,.'.ve .... .. PLAN at nr�ni i nnw Nn�i e:w SECOND FLOOR PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN ;o NORTH CITY OF ITEM; �Tfa3�� RAl1'C -IQ C�LCAI i6�NGA TITLE:.ZZWoa7;dAelT I - PLANNING DINtISION, 6 E.4HIBIT.--SCALE- .fal•f4MI1YfY>•r �.m � �4.r,C J r �. U I • rrrrrr IT L I L.7-1rm_ -El] r3c.10 i t • - ;� C777 �naaa t PLAN vk • M 4M in s.:YfwCY'� . 1a �� r�; �4�A��2ti•w1.�, cat••-L~ ,�.. �` es.nYmw na . L ,:. ■ ®ts . �1t. •,r . �.rrrr t cL_I . MEMO 0 PLAN C2, NORTH CITY OF 1TL\I: T. /_,3_.f C RAINCHO CL.rCAMOi\G TITLE: PLANNING DIVIS ON, � �� E�4 iII31T:—��.e__SCALE. --�-' f '� It �cwC •OC• -rya! TTr.�.y 1 • 1 ! • �._ tw - ,LF RIGHT REAR 1 T�—co..e T • Lela —�,w 1 I r; PLAH"C• .`� 910E a REAR ELEVATIONS__ 1 LEFT ' •_ NORTH clTy OF RANCHO CUcA1TVTO\CsA TITLE: X-cWr PLANNING DIN'I:iIGN / a3 E`1H113IY' V- SOLE 1l a •.IINJ ■sl11 .•�'. fiGi L sr oen 5 t r6, lam a�• T®R - tl , t L. ��r .1U•� !e'er`7 t If -� ' �E) 1t�a�Jill saiiim fte tw _ 1 i 1 an•ewr== i LII, �•�Ir�,lel.r. — ..�.. 0 'ram .. \N\It,s`I'I7M'1(kl\I 1��n' � 1)lN - - !t■M��`.. • ,`� 1- IN11kt:aN. 7Mlriii;Y'� hAII[14n nl i I,K.m 1\I. l'.11UI3- ..J II1'I�f.MYI\I�10[Mc17\Ij IIIINII,tN11 a 711\iyl 1r•Ill yl•It1 SECOND FLOOR PLAN 9RST FLOOR PLAN • I • NORTH CITY OF -�-1 1TE�I• T/.33 rf2:r RAI CHO C CAMONGA. TITLE.--d5eAV-47-pel w.s PLANNING DIVISI N 6'ten, EXHIBIT- r SCALE: z, ry pyH r� �•�' < . IT yn • 4txsLLR ?T \ ��.,. � ,Y �;. .////rii�='1•r!1.i�rt, Jt�iII�U 'r �n.. y .�y j1/'t`{eY=�� {�D�� ••'S F I,,r /�.t •tl.. r ?•1, _` r2 r 1 r tJS �1..rb a.e4 ii•Ge.r•.:.r �,I r TR..�,y'Nil i. DUD all •Q l _ � 1 r. no � _ `� Q• -- ,'.t .• lii �1..9i►l 1� - rSo��Fr NORTH CITY OF ITEM RANCHO CLTCA1/Io TGA TITLE-.4F45ra :'LAI`II`li\G DIN'ISIC),N - 3 EXE?IIiCi'= -- SCALE: , t Fl r-=Z7 7-'= A1GHT -' R HEAq i — •+4 l.r.r l � \tStd tRl¢Lr .`4 l . C•__ _ � T�'r••—�. •is -- — PLNi-D- SIDCC REhip / LEFT - E[EVATION5 • •_ NORTH Or � iTc�t- 7"a.'��s<Z RA\CHO CUCAMONGA TITLE- PLANNING DitjISlQtii ElHtI3tT; �/_" SCALE ANN / II'' '„�:...,r. err u■ _�� >i? � ''�•��•.� ��ui seas au - ��-:•,.,ter`.t-tr-;r r•_ ol El Al • aleoxeroo�rw PLAN E —mos. ��eonuir. {16206,R N/.00NVI RN� .xul noa+l ruM � EASTERN PART LM. ESASIC JTANDg2f7S NOIt'I".-i CITY Or, IMN1: 7:T. .33 4e RA1'GHO CUCATMON TITLE: �-_vgTra ils PLANNING DIVISION � - � ••, 1 �- � i��Hlnlr:�L_scaLc: — {Cta• .t4J3Pli m n_...a-^'+ 'J ,.,A."Y r .::_ - - ;i.n•' iQQ:':iQir v, f-.G:...+. J • jS' ,ftu. f1Qr.lls oi .•. I i i °i:yy`.nw t 1�0i 7S 1 j 1 �I f 1�1 ttfltli Ills r ilia. it( rer"`�. �. Fa�tN'e:�e�u.•r,o,a `e .,l.e,.,�o,wa-,.� •._ ,•+:•;-• i h ! 6 r. lax 121 NMI �iJL Q i.iil tlI r' � ill h'iiiit. i t y ,V 1 aill Itlll '❑ t .. tl » ew EA6TERtJ pART ' ' FORTH CITYOF 1TG1t: 7rT.a RAINCHO C,°CAirIONGA TITLE: PLANNING DiNrlSlav 6-36 FXH;Mr---2L-�� It 4ISTFA PUN OF EXISTING TP - 1A ��s.wit, •sno,y.� r. t} ar-a ram/ `- ..:w,a.,c•,,,. 6L�i 0 �l L—I3- I —^ '��, j��.^mil •er •...^ r'J PING ST. - •----�..�_^.NWEiEENiH STREET—_ -- NORTH ° CITY or, RAINCHO Cl ICAi\,I0.NGA TITLE: PLANNING DIVI'IQ.N _/3`7 EXHIBJTi ---.�"it ---- SCALE-...,. "r ��:�.r ter'/`•.��. .II.N IL{�1.}IGEt1C�("t.,BOX) Ill` @1CN4710Ni VAl4'.L•CT+ON 1-.L 0- DlRmQTOlY Er 10 44 4 F �� t ` - NORTH flrrTGlt�--`TTi33 5�r� RANCHO CUCANi I��.7GA PLANNING DIVISION � .��' FxHm r--�.___scam w...�� .,...`._. 1 i n n...._...n n n�tL Jt /•a -~t• ,;�^"ga� It ♦�s�i t ttt Ml i 7 4 . •�vnFt• ._..Fs4KY ,. .•T,� Y .,,. C. I ' •. 6f ,1 `c. 1 -t ._ 1 x _�i'�'e'I—. t rY• v,aa AA+�� ^'i�1"{ - - Y'ww W _ - 4 Ill •//1 YA. ,..Y 1-�—y} _ -47z� 0 4 •CITY I�UILTH O ITEM:_ .T/33�� R INCHO CMINT IONC A, TITLE: i�c'fir_. G"�et t�,•,yG PLANNING DIVISION �'. �t� EXHIBIT... a<k�� SCALD t S Il.w 1 ) � •.ram`` ('/// 1 vti k1.r _ ��- � •J•!. J-Q 4� L � .tf�w. 1, 1yl jilt a f - I 3 _ •� I I {� it �1 }i A y2 qe +,ra I T, Ile IJ ;:°' :r., p s^ t• r• _F � �. �. �st\tr�peLT 1NTwy oQ3 aN J ��lwla ILMT�Ow 'r NORTH CITY o_r -�; a IT[3�I= ]�_�.1TC O CUC.ALy10S-A TITLE= �� 9 PL,ANNIN� DIVISION �. y0 EXHIBIT:-=__._ cALc= i I + t .r�}„w� t�+�r� (�ys�(rSt •�. r n 'ra ]. t ,, y � yt VA '"}�� lli i�#!�i(p x l 1, ,.lilt' t � � + J lu , !� 1 "i/ �. 'fit +•r�{ �Nam•-q��•( t :t �Ellt[� ,L��yfC,N ��f '4•:x.u� al,t�,y't .:iF:IIIIii11Lf yl s•Y -11" ,•�.r� iC! 'e 1�I�+t i'7. _ a� �'�. 1LIRA: ...+�4 rt �`:a a __tart i 'S4Sff°i ` � —�_..._ --•tilU+ ti S 7�s�Z _-�'`_— '-�I_�:9?— �!s�� 1U 6,+ `.��f�;�e 4 ' �•�j�k'a�[r��.r�'•�xr, 1� III `�� I 1 ti i 1{; �. �.a ._. ...� ..��5.!•�w�,—=L_�yam` _ -�AR;�; itWll S/INS 17 I ----`—'�-- `I I�t CND � \J•1� � ��IJ 1�� t� �3I 1,� � �,� �� 1 I I ems(+1 lJh•^°- i3 F , ��j� p ( 1 c t If ie'... ."�._!f. "!_ mil{.' �� r 1�•�•�11,_—___�� •�. s.w..w www«_". .� � � 4 n..uw n. r � i PARTIAL SI I L PLAN a I FORTH CITY OF It1l 0 C UCAN110-NGA TITLE= PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: `tM•• SCALL: i •- I i ! t a e••. r '"�. r•` t F r FI rt(f IF I Lill t7�FitF IUk•• r{ �r ,,� =R �X ,�s�af , w !� i' ,�`•��9'9C J4~ �•r:��H� .C•7��' k:•!��-- t�'•� ".' i.. �1/ ,tSkC` � -�-•�..=- }"' -- ` �..,:. �:-:_�. '�r� ------ -• �i'i",�ia? ,�rta_4'�i,.AEI. �Y ?�__`c;+, 3 ��try�y) G IIUM liClAt In 8 ^_ _ _ _ .ik � 'S .. A •-; C.k'�� l� - 2 �14 u�LL-. eZ• �,w'J��'A ,`:��,yLt,..-�"�..-. "•kx ��.,\i 4 r J�µ. �• �. .; to i vet r�' t _ �k =t� r riat.~•�t _ _ — —f`.t't til sort REV. r.- 9 I wU�i� VW_ 11)f!� r.�'k • it fld IMW4, �+1�4..n'r!"Ri i;.,r +3iV � /bmu'. vte) Yr runr A tNr •. t CITY OF ITE%I: NORTH - i RANCHO CUCA.i'OINGA TITLE PLANNING DIVISION � .�.Z EXHIBIT µ�~ SCALE--- --._ i f:!, /��, •�St)'�� - a�r�r .+�� s � �• fT11 "� �j-�+]!!ss i�]S�.s+F t' ){' -( �,.�' �. ../ a' \,�5�f�.. .. ,T + pt7 , � 4 t� { t�.[_._ t�li i�'��"s� 1•Ju �. �t a' i^�+�.� �i G.]�j,+��,_3_� sec( "•.f K •' ��C')P�,. o.—._�-�1 �e js-�'."'�� r L t f� �. '2,: IILAti+(,Ilil Ll p flif HIM t.NAi Y]YS rL] ` MrtPl-0 rrtM Ste11CT WOt utwrWuc ` Ur t.l1 tj yfu ILLY. �"�� _ •1 .ti:'!I tb,vy It<tti�a�iblcl u,l!.�G II� ! t •;(-L.! r •ii Ur r.•N tl fdt . r V FORTH CITY r. IY O RANCHO CUCANIO ITGA TITLE: �,Q�w,'+a PLANNING DIVISION � ..Sf3 EtiHIBIT,- '� � - ` _SCALE-. �I�U gray' t r ' '�-•�.av-..�,b..r.ev're,.ra;,�v.'t�1F�..i-1'•: '� J. Doom I CITY 01,, RANCHO CLC,�i�1Uc��. i'LANNING DIt'rSON TITL)r=,� k RESOLUTION NO. 4 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13342 ¢MO DESIGN REVIEW THEREOF { WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 13342, nereinafter "Napo submitted j by Petar Laden, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of. San Bernardino, State of California, described as the total development of 11.46 acres of-,!;ad in the Low-Medium Residential District into 69 lot residential subdivision for the development of 68 single-family homes located at the northeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street - APN: 202-191-13, 23. Regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on September 24„1936; E and R' WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division`s m reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at ti;e public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to refffda i—ve Tract No. 13342 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistentwith the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; - (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed, (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, { now cf record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. i PLANNING COMMIS41DN RESOLUTION M September 24, 1986- TT 13342 ?annon Page 2 VW (9) That this project wall not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2 Tentative Trr4ct Map 'No. 13342, a copy of which is attached hereto, and Design Review thereof, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: DESIGN REVIEW w 1. An erosion and dust control plan shall be submitted for review and aproval by the Buiading and Safety Division prior to issuance of building permits. J 2. Noise standards of 65 CNEL (exterior) and .45 CNEL (interior) shall be met for dwellings located within 400' feet of the Route 30 freeway corridor and adjacent 19th Street.. A final acoustical analysis ''. shall be submitted with the construction drawings to plan checking prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Low level lighting shall be provided in all open 1 space areas. Construction details shall be provided prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Final landscaping plan shall provide unifying landscaping theme for entire project: including special accent shrubs and trees to delineate pedestrian linkages to central open space area, subject to review and approval by City Planer prior to issuance of building permits. S. Dense landscaping (15 gallon trees, 15' on center) shall be provided along entire north property line. A minimum 60% Evergreen tree type shall be utilized as noise buffer. 6. Special landscaping entry statement at Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street entry shall be provided on final landscaping plans (i.e. special accent shrubs/trees and ;=ual color). 7. Final design details of perimeter wall shall be submitted to City planner for review and approval, prior to issuance of building permits. 8. Submit material sample board to City Planner for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. G�y ` PLANNING COMMISSION RESO,>UTION September 24, 1�95 TT 13342 - Pannon Page 3 g. Submit sign permit: application and details of project Directory sign and other monument signs to the City P anner for review and approval, prior to issuance of'�Puiiding permits, 10. Texturixed surface shall be provided at_project entries at Hermosa Avenue and at Street 11A". 11.. Proposed security gates shall be reviewed by City Planner a-d Foothill Fire District prior to issuance � of bui l dfig..permi ts. ' 12. T:!o (2) existing 36" Palm trees shall be saved and enclosed by a chain link fence prior to issuance of t any grading or building permit and prior to commencement of cork. Fences are to remain in place during all phases of construction and cannot be removed without the written consent of the City Planner until construction is complete. 13. The remainder of existing trees may be removed subject to replacement planting with Eucalyptus Maculata, 15 gallo» size, as part of twerall landscaping of project.. Said trees shall be highlighted on the final landscaping plans and are separate from trees required elsewhere by these conditions. 14. Recreation building elevations shall reflect the dominant architectural elements of buildings, including supplemental solar application. 15. If it is concluded that the existing block wall along eastern-boundary was built off the property ine, then the developer shall in cooperation with tha property owner/developer to the east, install one common block wall along the adjoining property fine. A letter of agreement from the property owner/developer to the east shall be filed with the City prior to issuance of orading permits. 16. 3' planter are shall be provided between perimeter wall and sidewalk along both sides of entrance at both project entries. 17. Non-view obstructing rear yard fencing !." high with gates (i.e. _~.vs0ht iron) adjacent t: c►antral open space shall be provided in the final `ndscaping plan. 18. Minimum 20' foot corner side yard setbacks (from curb) on Lots 17, 18, 54, and /58 shall be provided. "7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION September 24, 1986 TT 13342 - Pannon Page 4 19, Final landscaping rlan shall provide dense planting of deciduous trees 115 gallon) along all buildings with southerly and westerly solar exposure to mitigate solar heat gain. TRACT MAP 1. Existing°Overhead Utilities: a. 19th Street The existing overhead utilities e ecommi cations aad electrical) on the project side of 19th Street shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the west project boundary to the first pole easy. of the project boundary, prior to public improvement acceptance or ocrupancy, whichever occurs first. Reimbursem('.t of one-half the adopted cost of undergrounding from future development as it occura on the opposite slide of the street is feasible because the property is presently li undeveloped. b. Hermosa Ave. - The existing overhead etilities e ecommur.ications and electrical) on the project side of Hermosa Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the south side of 19th Street -to the first pole north of this project boundary, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. Reimbursement of one-half the adopted cost of undergrounding from future development as it occurs on the opposite side of the street is not feasible, because the property'is presently developed. c. The existing services crossing both of above noted streets shall also L rundergrounded. 2. Any improved stub private street shall be provided from the northerly east/west private street to the north tract boundary centered approximately 160' west of the east tract boundary. 3. Access, drainage, and utility rights over the tract private streets and the right to use the common open space (Lot W) ar4 the recreational amenities a part thereof, shall be granted to Parcels 2 and 3 of Parcel Nap No. 3334 (AFN 202-191-20 and 21) located to thenorth of rr the tract and to the out parcel (AKN `s,, sfactlon otothenGity Engineer s Avenue ty Planner and City Attorney. Pi AW,`al)G COMMISSION, RESOLUTION September 24, 1986 TT .13342 - Pannon ,. Page 5 4. The developer shall construct all off-site drainage facilities determined necessary by the final hydrology and drainage report as approved by the City Engineer. 5. The existing small 15` x 20' approxmately) parcel iAPN 202-191-271 located at the northeast corner of Tract Loti No. 69 'located at the northeast comer of C Heather Street and "'A" street shall be acquired and included in said Lot 69. 6. Street dedication shall be obtained and improvggents (i ncl udi.ng a flood wall) constructed along.t the Hermosa Avenue frontage of the out parcel (APN 202- 191-27). 7. Tha flood wall along Hermosa shall W,constructed with a rock veneer to match the opposite side of the street. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA k �. BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST Brad u er, epu_y ecre ary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the { City of Rancho Cucamonga, at re7,ular meeting of the Planning Commission hel d V on the 24th day of September, 1936, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: i I 1 i �«uac N.m+o c.iL 4�a c.4r..�'' nv9yp a=a✓.{. "(�� n O 0.C..6 m wa gC � •6 034 � Illt a,�+U+n�V4 4L6 a+4�e eQ t tHO MAY eLSLiO.G 4mL4 f b� ��r GZZ aCr au n b.MY yC6Dc G4� VV¢F 4RK neti G w.�y Yr re VralnU"r`U ACMQp. �'dC' �rw��.a =,yV YLCCm. B qy mN ALh a'O'Oii V��.D.Y Tr.C. L V Gwu cVr LC�VG Z YE mnMa.A c^✓ __�� u y``y Q..��G rga.r. I�AnN� '� ya o'mBLo u �Ne S. aL+6AM y�y@@derbN LL L.+� C$C sL ii �.ynd� H e UV�YNU4.<OM 4Lr1��m Corn. 0.NY YN »~N rN�qp a rLL4 Yaa.��N «.mo>.m. R fill NLM�Tmi yYV~ ..gA�mUVY NGO.K�j ayn Ai D�� VmmY. awq Emu 6 C21�■e +m'�4NQ �� U�YY� m r..�J Ty La ZSVtr..r. 9Cy1 G N am P� .4�.K V SyVr L0.T`m.Va wNi.rVUy L Ndc�y�. m+ir ¢ m 4 TCm ++4�uNwc o4p II �r+CaA 4""LL4 a.42 L�/Z`^ G HRCrUN Sou .(»r�«Y gOaQim YC dM 6Ci v V d t n� a 43.C.Og4QM�M w4 A AMm +4ayLp1 04 yy r a. .a. C r+V CiSy� V.NS tJ NaD. L 4 M YO rA p..t `Ua S �V .LSO q 2b - m}Al "u t o cuny�r t '� lilt ICY . ilY ,Vl y � rw 3s Zo.V =n.O. egti j�uEC=a'. _ "aE. rn .oi"e S 6� t �w=N YL .'cupn ou zNr'w'cni�H9 2,Yu O Y ■ �^ysw• A m .... !04« o=o. qa C A V V p 0 C S ��M 4 O.t■N~O 4 q O�Y t �U L _ V.N Y N Q �� +YL • V�Oa i4 YL^ s u±A� �.yw V �=3ti p` L y 4 JEELC yC ON p�4wL C Oy N^ O A n V Y 4�. qp�. p9 O p W Y t V^c N O N Y L L � O b ■! 5 u. ... G b. A Y i - b ♦ L aQ N O p'3 L q t.Y- G V t)C L Y i O u N M G V Y G Y N O a p G L C -.� wC C 4 Eat.66 CnY4w ee. 7r`^Z'G Kb N Cv Hvair YL u'u Ys Y Y, iZN VU 56 W a�E GC <V N6.6 6 Lf Iz N 'S u.w- d 7;';R L - V.O 66 iY V�..ati n0= 'yu`off` �N mot. �-.�e sy c auLu�4s o'w' s.c pup ems. ~u^w Eta �T� y' .-xta..L&a,.c� w •-•-, bN• `u VSCT 6 L YL C CE<a rya V y ....4 NL O �u^a Gn dCc 9c LO t� �a G�.L1r O� CL bu YG => r V o Y Cb uCY� uu L p uNY Gr La ' �� L>Y � buL ^' C.p�0-••4 NL�Ly O%y.W�Su p P v 2 L Y Y 4 G pun• !L C b E!0 0� b`�v.�p LV� «Ya L n� per. y.•.Cp.r nLA C�Yu L^> yG wG^ Yb a� :•moo eV 9GLv��a�p oY Y a 'a'n L L iJ O u O N uc N Y Y. Y u p 1 O V,y N b d N E . Y V � �q 44 i Y a p ai+pC L�+L S.V • N R^ G �=N i1 G,rV 4♦ � C O y E 4 9 �Y aY V A C^6 a g C G C�.- GO C�� V uag L a^ q+ Y GSY �Y +C^4V a_S.VL O a �r JL dub V . L L nu n FL,ry^ cu� _Y a�PnY�u 4nau« a ooa LwO <MA VfV Zz ✓w SV watt N� r� �. lzz7 as.'+ci co.L i �o. n o.u a u. p^Y L 4�� `V ^�+vu zr r ..� cs eNc ..0 L'ae M in D• r� �x 6 O N Y r tl O O O C Ny T �y 0 0 0 L• �>��tl 2 ` car �.: L.. n� .. • .� "� N -0 u"Y�.._q I P�_ O Y- N r = u xy x YNs •p L. ^ •. c G tN>. c T q N ^ • ^Y M >c .ao NCY 'tY uLa Nw N L^a Y dQ OPO� Y tl. VL MN — Q1 ,�pY LAN 7z.� >> OD^N �>.y -0�M ^ "'•D V— u DOL P r ^ � I Oo�9 Y••o J'L war L.. �a'6gONLY^L.OJ ;OVrY 9� ON>•- LO d24 G YR q.Y Oea q Nr•.t O 6a hA OIYO'" LbN� 4. W Y p M r c4Cw^ Vb t`vCNdON 9.LN < t- E�W� pN xN �L q�Y c��Lp Ab NL Cy a OgoN JOri V8 Y L y L`O t 1 LC ��6 .11YN M tOIq V/Gt cgay C��++CM Y Yp� C k N CO Y L� _ •i q��> �� -O LN tl 0•• .Y�.Y - -0gQYY YYr w d d^ yY O L Y Y.z 4 t �Y.+L. . Vr p 6 Mtl VpgwN L YgCLOpcc C! C v a, OlO.YL�w OLY G NY>6t —Y .Ni Aap. O>g q K 4 6 !q t <u Iv 0 6 N I a�u s'vq v5 aY EL a""4�� c a�.�' >goa e:u w -$ c pp YrN `C• S. r.= M N Nv6AlC3 CT OO Ns .d c YaS�•y 6.Z C CcEzY,d I+fg,P=^ 6 YLL^ c E/YJ Vb L4d> GVC Nq ! C�.=xj ��= YQ.O� c Yq y•9 w. LVEY d YN Yp 9 N Y r a J¢ L O r= - `_ 4� a Y. O Y V t� oVC Lav' r Lu Y �C J_Yg9 —rY� On3_bC '. .!C A C V JJg OOY— :>Ea bb"`F�L 1 tl �iJ �� ytlOq dpdN yOr OpY Y q F q 'O bh cYppp,, Zj —Ld 'NON O� 2T V O Ny~O L Yd? yE TV Vtt w O V'%Y EM9 ' G O > N OM rlL. VVOq LgC•LHQ M ..�. LOgEy 6fs60 N Ob? y&Y 'u -0 a--- VO N aNYiO bN:V NC•>��U 6 N V M ^emu O.p .0 N �C�Oy V> y0�. 6L.L O L =.y^ YC, _6e1� L2 QN Vr C y G C Y Q cC. JJ Y 9.N w LC ON OUVG Y..O.v MVc q 7•• YOL Vic. • ^V'Vw z r Y OrrY^ Y Y ■ v y b LO u 6�VL ""��` .� ��• L O.0 J^q• YDq ry rr Vy. Y A>.{EV1 S OLp 'EY ^=6 l..MO twWO > l9M Hpypi !ti i0 F=•9N�4 4Cd KMO.w Wty LpMNJO+Y 6 -sz W VGT airG �L�' K2 • N �� ^N,�a N.Jr. Sf a V C c` yg gg 2lp V rarY ,• j�V QOrYa-J ^J6i1' ,J. ✓'�YL l~t=i6u C�yy Q a QIVL tJ, N. ugg M."G � O�Vy. MviYS rG. •y.N. Q yl�y sari. A000 N4M _ b6 O �� d LNSJn r•� 4 V LO�. a C�+n VV 1�GY� �VV Gr�- � f N�� o, v%+=�¢cY., c�c W d�+' uNN,•.- �... 'tic a. mS qVw Gam— NGpLyw pV6 IX +� O.c 'a�ita r' 9 _�Q.� yQy �V E. Nd� 64L< 4 ^w ^iOy 04 O T`pu A T L. to^a 4.oa r".s YaS � iyY+'r us`�> u�au� w Y,p „�NF � _^ y V•+r Y-- V VqV » if m e'L1w N@Qv w4L a Y "N ,nspv� y��gyJ�Ler ca ,� a 0 9 • 6 Y�S =O i o J S�L w +J.�r 4 N tVL M Y S w 4 u= .. L•iC S. ^ o N.. _ Y �L� V^M a.yw J=K �f LY.N O. I�w4 O O JL l�polrN 4^aWII N � ✓ N 64d �� Y1� vi A� � Y� •n N 4�I � C 1 2 a.. 2MV wl�Yy Yty. y`O Y wV a �L� f 9� d0% a+=L9 yEk Y��NIJ i ''O .pit4 y,Ny` p v oc p �9r— G4 . •p+ 6�5. a uUdV S LL— V' .vu aYIQ u6y G p, Nc V qu SG� =z u» n�4 4 V 9 N-Y 9� Vt� ��M YOS � Ybi .aw S 'y Q G^.Y ^c°nFS'� �u� is" u•� ^ti a• LiLw Nr CC_ .Yil V= ,a, ^ wCL= ai aN1 yya � O�wC .Cj Fv'N 4 GppwCL- _Or }Yp�� 4iyU Fy p • war."Y a•r. 6Y--O, !V wPd O•w+V O.—eA ` iC~ a� &'O G yYyNC 9 EV E pi.. N.wi> ^ay E L GrO.�v `tiV� VO Y C 6 �a�9 L ?`LA iY r.^ OVQ II Fi S, _ZF'ou.. O4oy; �y a.ovE up aN "'� U G Nj G .u...aa+ ^� Ga pqO YG V etas J-"�t@ p.��ath p� cQ _ tS 6F YLL C ~Y 3 aM Cp`. Gassw'2^ �p w 4N T.V . T QOY @G�r i3 n+0 tr t G ^�Mq �'.• ytY Gp L 4 Y GC i��r.ViV V00 rYL.p. N—W — C t= J aY L p 4A G� V 6 aa.S PL Z-12 4GLt �� CU 4V Y :.--.i Oa...Oi r• V D.w �a 49G 1M L • �.wit]I �V 1• .r \II � V a Y. j I ©ct SGO C�� N6L L CCyEI C v N V z V.N �.. G 7 T t V R. �y y.w� S1pV yP yuy a. � 9. vV CnL uaia 1'• .a w. O1nw 40 Y'�.6 y � x '� Y �N9G �� y}y�I Yp Ny ! 1•iT � N N ` bv� � (J. L q '—N L Y a p O JCYT N�p 3N pl$6 Sal +� v N Y 4aa+ alf M.� N Y Y.. a,ge wm. � � ♦ P m ... G m N.yQ 'RYbp6 Se c Q aa.m V G `~ y V O C.q. �� a L.• y q Y= n= ZW. .P..O.?O Nam. } yU:.0 y p$u 0 .1 V� F� m L 1 pwG a� 'N. 0 0 W J L N tiGGd ^Pp r�...c � C l� 4 �+. YyV.N� Y • p�`Y � p CIS C pT a1 AI. C. hYw A, as R O Y � V L v '^ =C r c � �.` vy La vpR N paC •y� • �Y �q w ;a � � �..p. f3,� � �m� T ¢� Q.V;Cq ' 2L LO YC `bC a 4 wY ny � Yq`Y UuiY� Atl�N� ^ pN G o^s aqa o y aq Y� c YYPo p¢Pm YSL$n SS s �+r ao aNdr ,.4i ` CNN , -.'r5 Lp Y q.qa Jam.. JGq G'ou� N01LJ yC q NN ZOO y�T Y G �. `w �N pn oiNc oaEy" L P P V y p L V _ om= ^ y O y .0 F O tS q w� L JYy d 4 mG li Wy 6 AY LOt LC V'`N� At er., Aa omY `any �QN `Y OrN G E 'v N 6 Q pQ w q—a V L YPNtl= .N'C J 4 Tmf m N a i 7 Y N Y C+ Gr D Y P L q A H a^• f� i�G Ii Cam'i—z F .. WmR -1 Ytyl �A UA-x C;s -CD -C M. YO ♦ JB u t \ , r. �' V G^V O N }L i i � ``A�y � � .�i d a 4✓ �V Q N} Gr g p •.1 w N 0 1 p y 9 L Y a M C uvo_t .L. � vyg H c �yosEN a N a 2 ^ VI LY CJ G tl^ �a n O �a 6 O L .' O6a we G Y z9 41C =� Q ^ N Y Y n ` O { 1E� YN v Q. �yy0 �N «r 1_jL tll L w a ' G d r� ist Au .n wqY a tlHw 6� dOG ^ LGaOY Y N.. aqU L UE� r y��yOu = d pY p OY 0 i. �.mjO SiaV O cw L - O E.u � n C JV ON ry cC Y m OO CC ^il a � CC Me C Vf �. ..Fd=Y OM>• A � OI 6' wG f.t Y$3 aaG W4O�. � LCy.dLpL�f 9Ctl ueyaa 5 ^ 3n oO noO N 3 �� 1•V V W t pN ivi N O � f Vr I i urn ., at 4.."' 4 CL O i..0. G �J rnY PYy AY d C at UQ G. {J F� Ltl6 o t ca g 2atl q ` N VGd S ga C wn E� n c u o• S$ � H..r u�rJ a��o a�W nn� ^9 Ac n=a« nQa CUrOwr. �r tl �. e+n J \ L n .y"a o c= ac.N oaW ..�Luo LNy 'f.OtY. WE t3 � �p O �+` y('•.... C^.� yyGdw YV� d Lt� C�c i. p60� R tl` SHY N.GW.�I� �QW I 2�.W • I 0 z U d •n O i. d I a C C Y ,at i..�.ua �•a •4^~.c rn " ��.� yL W oL^ Y�m Op .y.•^ CC � axmp o hu•L�° i. •O S �i y �O. N{Aj N C LO W c 0 T.0 dY pA CON O\qW a O.s 2t O T 'Ur � • � � A^'� 6 � vM L�� pNq Y Cq A r•q� vV 60. •YnyO O OE W C o' Q Yu �a ov YN Y O e o a Ni S^: b`•�G �4'�ef L �� ` Ay �Y C a qVy L Auo L N Y N«Y V 4 N Y.Y V d C$ a0 yy Y N L a 0 4 Y.y LL Y g v 0 41L c M v L N� Na4^ `rn ^dre o L Y o N=n L q+ A� \yW` O L a L u` �@ L C. C t N t 6 J p J V V Y a 0 X^ OL V•VOr O !` LG2•y� 44.N V Nj�6. •O.A E V ^' L M �A y^ w• ^^+ ` Lu Y Yt YY�O� jy VY �Y MT •O �N6 t p �A ♦•� N.. G' L..C. C'�i^ 4^ � 4u C VIZ 6a C W FL Nr'�•jt.�- KLOi u� <3 O.NwArN i�� v� 4 G IL-.O- Ln¢Y Cw A. Y •• �I � O� � � IC� N � 9 N` W CITY OF RANCHO CUC_AMONGA G��y0,1, STAFF iREPOIZ T Fi z DATE: September 24, 1986 1977 J: Chairman and Members of the Plarning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: nan Coleman, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN request W ame 1'.Use Map o erra vista fry, proposed junior high school site to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 du/ac) for 20 acres of land located on the nest side of Rodhester, north of Church Street, and various related amendments to the ' deusity provisions of the Community Plan, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA :VISTA, PARK,DEVf.LOP14ENT i 'AGRE`FdEN i'" supplemental a-greemen.'regarding a approximate y O acre site located to the' west side of Rochester, north of Church Street. 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Actic ;A:ent Requested- Approval of Community P1ao Amendment and 1e e.-:F "7gre�aent Amendment pertaining to a change in land use resignation from a proposed Junior F:igh School site to Low Medium Residential and issuance of a idegative Declaration. B. Purpose: To fa;i;itate the ievelopment of residential anits. C. Surrounding Lane Use and`7oning: or - acan , es gna eo Low-Medium Residentai (4-8 du;ac). South - Vacant, designated Low-Medium Residential (4-8 du/ac). East - Single family residential, designated Low Residential (2-4 du/ac). West - Vacant, designated Low-Medium Residential (4-8 du/ac). D. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant and gradually slopes to L:e sou, at approximately 2 to 3% grade, Existing vegetation consists of native grasses and scattered Eucalyptus trees. s ITEM H PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment Terra Vista Park Development Agreement Amendment September 24, 1986 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS• A. General: The Etiwa^ a School District is requesting that their. nacre property on Rochester AyYenue be rezoned from school use to Low-Medium Residential use (#-8 du/ac). The school district -` has determined that when an int6rmediate school site is needed, �.; it should be located fartherll to the north and east. An effir,.ient method of disposal of the 20-acre property to obtain land more suitable to its si�udent needs (e.g., elementary schools), is for Lewis Homes tol'obtain the entire 20 acres. In 3rder to sell the land, the 246acres must have economic value by providing for a land use designation compatible with that of ` adjoining properties. B. Community Plan Text Revisions: Lewis Homes of California, co- applicant on the proposed amendment, N,as prepared the attached supplemental document to the Terra Vista Corhnunity Flan. The pages of the Community Plan which deal directly with the subject matter of the 20 acre site are reproduced in their entirety with revised text and graphics. Other relatively minor changes within the Community Plan'are maide by reference. C. Number of Dwelling Units: The proposed Low-Medium Residential aT nd use designation would provide for the development of 120 homes at the"median density of 6 units per acre. This would raise the total number of dwelling units Fermissable within the Terra Vista Community (without density bonus) to 8,120 dwelling units. III. PARK (DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT: in conjunction with the Amendiment to e Terra rsta Community-plan text, the applicants are prerosing an amendment to the-Terra Vista Pars Development Agreement No. 1. The Terra Vista Park Development Agreement implements the General " Plan and Community Plan with respect to provision of park and open space areas within Terra Vista, and provides a reasonable balance between parks and hou-ting as the Terra Vista Planned Community and ensures that park land in the amount contemplated in the General Plan and Community Plan will be available in the Planned Community; as it develops. In addition, the agreement contains a clause which states that the City shall not undertake to reduce th. Planned Community base density at mid-range density as originally adopted in the Community Plan below 8,000 dwelling units. Further, the Agreement acknowledges that the Community Plan specifies that the total number of dwelling units within Terra Vista small not exceed 9,,!00 units (including density bonus units). A" PLANNING COM6MISSIOK STAFF REPORT Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment l,Irra Vista Parts Development Agreement Amendment September 24, 1986 Page 3 The First Supplemental Agreement to Terra Vista Park Development *' Agreement No ' 1 would amend Section 7 of the arigin6l Park Agreement to�'` ncre'ase the Planned Community base density at mid- range density to R,120 units and specify that the total number of dwellg units witlisin>Terra Vista shall not exceed 9,338 at maximum density, The revised figure of 9,338 reflects a density bonus of 15% of the 8,120 units at mid-range density in accordance with t.a amended plan. This is -consistent with the 15% afforrlab% housing goal and density bonus provisions of the Terra Vista Community Plan. TV. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: As t a result of the Initial Study, the project will resullf in an alteration of the density and growth rate Of the popula;:ion on the 20 acre site, and generate additional vehicular traffic and demand for new street construction when the property develops. The additional traffic generated by the 120 dwel';ing units is not significant and can be accommodated by the planned circulation system within and `around the Terra Vista Planned Cor.mtnity. V. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The subject property ;s suitable for the propose an�in terms of access, size ar, compatibility with the existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding areas. Furthur, the proposed change will not have a significant impact on k the environment or surrounding properties and is in substaW-ral conformance with the General Plan. VI. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public Hearing t In i e ai y�e ort newspaper, the property Posted, and notice, wewa`sen a proper y owners within 300,feet of tiled projcct site. VII. RECOMMENDATION-, Staff recommenft that the Planning Commission ctriduct a Public Hearing to review the proposed amendment and receive public input. If the Commission can support the Facts for Findings, then adoption of the attached Resolution recommending approval to the City Council and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. ;Re;sc�tf,Ull,y sttLnItted, its c� Brad Buller r City Planner BS;DC:ns 777W7 4 ` PLANNING COMiISS�I'QN>STAFF' PORT Terra Vista Commun�'ty PT,an Amendment Terra. Vista Park Development Agreement Amendment September ZA, I886 Page 4 ; 71 • z �y l F Attarnnents: Letter from Etiwanda School District ¢ Exhibit 'I^" Site Plan ' Amended Community Plan Text & Graphics ` Terra Vista Park Development Agreement Nt I First Supplemental Agreement Resolution of Apprpval/Terra Vista Community Flan Amendment 86-01 Resolution of Approvalfrirst Supplemental Ag;^eement to Terra Vista Park Development agreement 0 < yak F F I I._ S •' I a. R r� 9SCU"Distria J tda P.G.Box 248,Etiwanda,California 91739 (71.4)899-2451 May 13, 1986 —RECCtV -D Mr. Dan Coleman, Senior Planner crry OF RANCHO cUCAMONGA Community Development Department PLANNING DIVISION City of Rancho Cucamonga fi P 19 9320—C Base Line Road RA Post Office Box 807 '' AM �A Panetta Cucamonga, CA 91730 ;8;9L1 t11, .2.3 Dear Mr. Coleman: SUBJECT: REQ'vEST PCR CHANGE Op ZONE The Etiwanda School District hereby requests that our 20—acre property on Rochester Avenue, south of Base Line Road, be xpzone3 from school use to Low Medium Residential use (four to eight dwelling units per a This property has been indicated in various City plans as the future site of an Intermediate school,. Our Board has determined that we will not need another intermediate school for some years, and that when one is Needed, it should be located farther to the north and east, We do, however, have an immediate need for"),ore elemenl`.ar sckools and it is the Board's policy to own th,4 land before any school is built:. We have, therefore, developed a plan to a;:quire elementary school s^,tes from four major developers by exchanging this 20 acres for their land:. This exchange is the only feasible means available to us for acquiring -,.te el.ementa--y school sites due to complexities of state Isr related to sche '. 3istrxct— owned property_ To make the exchange work, the 20 acres must have economic value, i.e., it must be devekopable. 3f we sell, the land (instea3 of exchanging it), under the law, it would have to be zoned similar;y to the property around it. While we prefer to exchange the land rather than to sell it, the same reasoning RPr -1=- We are, therefore, requestang Low Medium Residential use, since the property around the 20 acres is zoned for that use. Board of Truateas R G.(,ferry)Bredtau j Gary R.Collins David W. Long Carleton P. Ug hilooZ 'Marshall S.Pruitt Superintendent ;�'� "� Cecitia'Solorio �I IF ikr tir, Dan Coleman, Senior Planner May 13, 1986 Page Two This zone change will, make the school land coutpatible with the Terra. 7ista..planned Community which surrounds the property. While we understand that Lewis Homes and the City have an agreement regarding the overall residential density of the areas now designated for residential development in Ter<r� Vista, our properly has never been previously identified as develppable land. We are simkly seeking a change of zone for our own property because it will not be developed as a school. However, it is im- portant that the rights of Lewis Homes to develop Terra Vista as previously planned not be infringed upon by your action with regard to our 20 acres. Lewis Homes is trying,to help the Stiwanda School District by participating in, and basically providing t'h& Financing foi; the land exchange. This is so even theigh the immediate benefit wiff be not to Lewis Homes, but to the other developers involved and the District. The_efore, we strongly advocate that the,,dwelling units on this property be approved 3n addition to the present target of 9,200 units in Terra Vista. It is important that Lewis ' homes not end up worse off by helping us, not only on grounds of fairness, ' but also because the land ;vicehange plan will not work otherwise. We would anticipate 120 homes to be developed eventually on this pro- perty, at the median density of six units per acre. This does not represent an increase in homes for the District as a whole, since a siailbr number of homes will not be btcilt at the location outside I Terra Vista which we eventually select for the fcture intermediate s ol. Therefore, this zone change will have no negative effect on out ability to house students; instead, { it kill have a great positive effect on our school development program. We hope that the enrlos_d application /`ar,be processed quickly. We ask that asy fees be waived, 11sase call me if you have any questions or if you need anything further from us. Very tru?y yours, � Y Carleton P. Light of Superintendent CPL-.rg I Enclosures I f ------- 126 s, -nMzAv - Vat/Mull E 7•�t-d �GJr tL f VkAUr lu I all CW !' I�A.dl�,7'f' c'0sautofz �tL�.�TfIA '• am�sc ` rwNr �- 1 Lxr: OVACA. ref 1sr �.M i vscafrr- u j i ✓ �° '�� t-ow.t-tea. rx.N,lfi1 l hd9D.aE9 oar VAGAw-r NO RT►i E' C7 ' 7 V�0 CIT ITEM: � R AI CHO CI, -- ��'IC�INGA TITLE.— 15/MU ) ,l PLANNING DIVISION GxiilpIT= Ser+[.E: �s_5�ou�lit rs `a �`.. �°"'_�� ..ter- r,� , - low LL1 �- cc ce Z V tn U c Li fn rn Q ^ e> c z w ui J LU m rn 4- All& d p w- mCOpsdV) a N U N C.O L O•'+ C L L 11 �.i•.a. LE. 1 C U Y �- d O 0r- dE c d aEi aaie:im E a>i rn� E m 3 U, u L a 7 C 3 p G w Mn4- c d Ec o >;ca „ mo > L� E d C-.a:''0 L 7" E > L- E E a7rotyciar19 E m E d= Lo c 0 C= C.Cm LL, hU m.. N._h.• 4) 4- tR to 4- 'o c t t y 4 tn YL tmin Euo E VOu u 4) -N La3U C' CO N E L. o> > C.c Cl Od S. O L.- L. 0 4' o C. m 4) CL to d ' Nd3 mN O O. 3 d N N O di C --- N M m N N drR d Em.0 p o 00 L �" 3 o ti> c 3 r. m °r a a'> E G U u d B3. to d o L C_ Nam- a d Q4l C d L m++= N TN O m C U) N h .C. N a . 41 b E> C.d �'++ d d L 'A3 •En d d•d m�da �+'.co. dd MI' aCC L. E« dLl �" Cl 7E" d d d _ N p m G. °m L 3 d� ora CN 3r� c -� c a�iS E > a s «+> :. C++Uf- L m m L c E E d� m ar E W o am,-0 tn 0: , dv � > r " c aCi y 3 C 3ddcn LNL ci' a c LC N uaC o« Eu dd C E C c ro of dG c ant m? E c c21 > > d y Aaro c�c v CJ a• _�•C 4_ O.- C i]*' m a•p 4�.� rr7 y L. LC 3. to N r 4 d U mm.C. tayOCLC ZN++ dC it pQ.a. L' La .r— S— CL Z «. l.� m b,s+•, � E •C- m oL d iv amid dp S. *' U C. O N >�hcmoQd aN, cC> 3m • p _ 3d "' C41 m JV> " m a.+ :r 3 °r' m 0 N d i7 4+ O C,O E y N m + C L d m a E E LJ•- r. Q) m ? d L d N 3 3 Q N CJI l' d d}- 6 L O L L C U d •C m fm,. CS1 d G'a''" 0 !-� 3 N am c In w y V� =d!o c w'" p C p F p'0 O >.U > m ¢V tip Nr 2 dC � Cct L��C R �+ 0.i [d. 0 hU h� E- dr al ttl Art Nu2 �Q F-4_ umh- 4) C <.c. ratpn ® • a F0 4� ��sa�■n�r�r�eiii•,�. �+ N4+ y m 3 r T+C AML E o C c o rj E lL u`� 0 n+ C d •y b�.0 rn 01 m t1 tom. Ca a to �a', ai u C m C mL to ul 41 R t0 to d m Q J U = cam N m m�+ N ttf Cil G. C 41 m al a)F- `"c c E CnM a n. a ,� >.'E30-0 w C o L E • • s Q ¢ d o a �- — C rn m C Ot a p C y m C tl. ±+ «C al >.- m m o a E C d G E tN t H t J N 1CA 0 N F to � al p 4.m C �• E d t0 E rn a V Ln C •— n r c0-0 0 E c Hsu to m d > m ul _ m a t. 6 y u C m a C $ at a d d t. m tocz a m 4, 0) N.+ tJ .0 L E a O L u'0,,, U �. N m — 7 « a% m u m L a w to U c O CL J W Z � J ul �' Om. m Q �' E.-.M w U N S m 47 0. ' , fT N: �.e ,.. z tT V ? co N P P1 UL t m rn�, ` m N r F- c m t i i i d i c'-«4 t 7 w o m C al ¢t i 0 A o w 0 aa)i 0Ci 0 N as-0 at ai a� i. �0 C, as d w rn rn my rn rn rn•- rn rn rn m OM rn rn to Z M•0 m m m L. -� m m to m m `+ i m m m w d m rn c. a. a U a n.U a m IL u m • c a tz, CL _`o L. �RAt/N3ftt}aO�j 9 'OAS{/!33>t1p0u S a w CL m f J C O 0 WV uolfelllw .9 S }' Z ca I __ o $ cr r m W Q X cr s e ! c Z Q 1°il H WD 'iAV ual-vH W g 'iAV uaArH u ' N W ILJ.i Q t{I 5 o o: E ► 0 E y m a IA.v i i L.c F-r� I 1 41 01 N C w' 1 .0 .-J''r dl L. ,C 1 4- ro•� i N ro 41 N •C,� C31 C C11 7 C al E C. U•- O E 1 q m Z7 t; O py N d• ,+--.p `. ro rn m4- a.0o _ o a t Lo. >«. InL , roc- o p u > � orn� m ,. "M" u� rr: in4) Cj jp > a`I CI�o° a� °c.0. �� i *3cow L ."' r=m E o yE .+ x a ocCL ) c'" os.rwwEw ° nE > ai .0 h 41 UI C.-. m c @ y, u'D m•C c•^c a, c 0 �_ L C. O. "' mticLw �rEv� ° LyEo�4 � ,nm >.� o °.urn� oL q ` >�E C fl� �3ti E c> 3:0 c o s cyi"u 41 'v L m �U C y t-c c a E to O L O T ro V C.. 4 t__ tn IV rrr p1- C Q,w :5 C w_ 0 �- d ro 3.+�''` `L 3 U V1 �,N U Q. .E;> d 11 O, .fl 1p ° C . .0 tth E L V C O H aC�pi ti. G �� = C}C.. 6a7 C 4) �y ro rna th Ica OZ; 3- o c q N U OIL wcEc•E � , .21 o ° coc .+ Nd uero � �.da 4 u Lo ro o ,, � w- E cu tutu•- x� c cm4cio� .rp -mac; I 'uf t°,..L+km O V N N L'. E.•r 6 3 N'a....a. E 0 Vl.2 a. pnvc� E c �-� a L�• L on � m mipy u Q mm3+ CC V .0 NCc L. aL1>`4o..c >'. O.Q. LJ o_ in (n cntn Ln m N > Q ^ 0 Co .tl a w— c a tT� ` ._ C ro yt to 3 C C v roc `' A i CL 15 tU u �.:. C L. •7 w.0 +' L. v.0•a:N L E� O C L> y 41 L.0 Q. '� LA+=•'• E c3a`_iu,. o« a! pc � � rcoo�m , 6. c Ea4i � �c� = M0 =t E L'c= w �y +L 41 U ++,c .. O C.�.. i+.V-u.. ro 41._ N L V ro ca 4).}•• v m. C:C C N CL = O Al lL��N.w•�=,� Cf_= �. - a C O _ �LL..+.H - m ��C � a+ C y CL,'Cn= O a=ti C 10J ul a Al •+d :? dl G*4 ; ro C o L LL.c._ c U.1 N ' L C 1i- ICa'' ro V C -'O+'�-'+L _ 41 1. N'+� +'c+."-.Y c p.'=-r.- t1 fa L 3 t!I >4rn> L �' _' In'° � rnym'3or0Lm� w3moa°'i"' }" o ion, o w m to +, e GAe ,aa t ,n° syp_Ec p ,. CL m L S 'n to d Q1 47 m O 1C t) 0.- y tU O ++ 01 1n to N E-c„_ C o O J m Q•a'c E a o j Oith L m F CIO D1_ to In O Vt c "i N to d N m E OI._ v !- II C p�L S Of WU D E A F v w to W v, u'«c. u ri win to c oro 01 9 . 2 .�'' � ' P � ;� s�� < 3 F � t n �) 1 �:. A .fi �} X- 4. 3 v F. t S + S - +E 4 � k r� X � " ri � a m e y xx �x � 'yk 4' �`1'a fA '� yJ \ X7t h f �h A �h��, yir Y �F r �+� � 1„ Y r �; Al 5�� .�:.w t� �. Ja � { .,. p F b b a 7i� � .. x �� n ��!}. ,�'� � ,� 4 � � x .;.;rya &� ,"x'.", l y S� !! 'k�� tl� 1 ♦ � '. t h:2 �. I � � $ � �. i ££ ,: t F ��5,�§ �� 4fZ i l� Z� '.'r ' f 3 �' h � � M �,' ` � t wg ws�� ` hY a' � c.G Y �.i;1 qq � A�y��5 .:r � r � E' 2 S �^ \t � i: ?x li, r O L3 G z C .W N Ems73 - 3 g g rLU Q8, s ® tn c A L g F• -� ! y cc s3 a 9 a vs a $ W AR y g r« C O w o s y H 'YAV UBACH C •GAV UQARH a— a 1- W C C ¢ E E $ C7 3 Ii U aE a 11- rna >.m oa 1 rnNY (D Lq Co Q.a) N -,- M N _ O C.L 'C O j 3 9 u u f- 0. N> .- C 4)E •>•C La VLLdtN. L L. yv.cu 'L� (0 (D 4)C a+ C L 0) mL C ) D7 L. w t.+ L 0,+ f0 L u Ql tn 3 0 N C L 0-0 a'7LF N u O C F C O E L N O f9 C •U+�""' u M•• C O 61 O 0YLL0. NNNNy— a10 AOGYO•Nu _.0 N u %-. 41 C N E.- m c!� 3 d R o (ui= .. « m 0 d m o.L L 0.c�� L o y E E 3 N m c a) — C 41 m 4) t a1 4• —4- d C > ,� j w N L �.� N 11 a c y, u L. 1 O r>i to Y L7)O.�. 4- d > L=-o 1c4 O d E N L to C a ` O W L L �,y a+. M C. CLdi 0-r u u c t m E s.++ c N uci a•-•(n o m'+- om ,, mmd �`+,_ E Eat+ oin N 4- > Eoc- ` aci u•. N 3 i L t L t 110 O E O p, O 4- •�..00. C N.? C ,� b w in O m 11f L N N E M.O d—Z., • C :1V !1 O N in f0 f0 Ct) u Ol� L C Ip O C37 la w C o1a L t0„ Y- o) O t. O f0 C L W fV.-+y u ca .o LL a ai c mi L m N c Ma3�«- a a 3 c E " a IC•� F'u-° 3`�o�� o ' Y �ys>.ac co � a L. >.oca � n arn . 0 a 04-2Y 0 di @C 4) w CD 0 coOQ� �CLdNCLI fO uo ocENon. o+ S- CLo uEa. Nma m s 0 F• F- uo s ,p S F A sZ r a c :x 'GAV jai atG*Qu v F- n, m c m ¢ e a N 'iAV URACHcc �C w ro CL^ � YQ � a`w U. G. O 1 E. ID a) C) M4- 0) C 4) C= A0 1 w >.m4- y fn •.Y N N E a)'" :.C- C) = 3co -.� c m )n-.roc Ero@ a� oviE o «a C+- _^ ++ o « L3 �'t._ a) L )n ,, t. Q7. C C d IA u o >.> a) o� vert"",, u ,; +' u 0? m4_ `" m d �m tm. o m Q+� L ro o C e u o d roc > o �,_ E H c E- i'� 3 a`i.�% E m v«Z m ro ono O L E L E"+, Cam.'N �.CA aa)) E i0 tL9 0 aciF tlF c c a a N R':5 ti mm c>)0)�C�•L''o o t. rou 0a: t ' mroE � j E4, voc,o .. y�7 acic°1irm � L7).Cr� N N y C i n U� o) in 0 N Iv C ro L— o.= 3r w o v a 5.r y U c d E c 10 > rn.r N. +�.� � u�iC7)+or � >•Q.`'' ��X N� NOUal I in °� mO. aE:; l�" � O a� un a d u c_ m c 3 d Lw cci c a "« � o u � M 0 EL. = 0 C:3 � .1 r` p N N ro 0 4) a) a) p.a) ro« v) L y L Qi'aL « U u E L C a) ^ o „ C m �¢ �� EUtr d� v4"-� d = d c c °� a c of ro '� C W U ro C4- ro U o i- a m > �.CL A m men ►+� C C ro L Cdu a d - Ln In *j UrTd N � vc �, U E om o ?; Qa cCm °) yE~mod nui3 � acid_ , m� `�Cs; a 4 u i " E C �`- °'= E a)U u G m ro In u " U N C �E 0 m4- � a) S o ro U o C+�+C o L. 3 m � c a In m d m 0 _ 3 m t: VQi JT L C > E.- U.�+ L.ar 41 u) CT)L. 6 —f+C u a) C u ro .0'C7= LJ u )n u Q) (n ro a) m C a+'y C a) C ar y 0.2 U) U u s T pt +� ccat;, w3cm p)E., Ca3 f0 " C sn >•E m',Aa m C _ d L. m C y H� 0c C(L)41 +cam' « cu ma' 3 taiavaa'ati r � FE F C mCP3 ac) ESE" L n G2ur'a` �d �aci ., E o _ ` o � a�io= 00Qo0oc• Ccx >•Qo > wccL- ��+C_ �N�Oiu 0 0 LLI 0 vim a) 01,E UUU4.. omo L4',ZCLarLarD? h-{.+ 3v3roNro t = mg N I� ¢ Q o c C7 Fes- 4 c ° E —t._._�.i� - —- Wit. �,.�,•,�, W J • •�. ® ►i cc t . 0 z � a _ LE t a E foil I � g Ln MAV W 214 N � -71 g � z ci ` w a t iI 6, W IL 11 x -• � cc d !li L L M a C 4•. 1 to 4- N N m `vim C! 1 0 1 41 7. 1 N 1 1 y,44 Ul •Q7 C N U I a,y a 0 E• -L L m C x C.:..4 f a: N @.� C31+'''C iA.o.Y u -14 X In m ro 4— >, p G mC; L u In � v� aLlcCY1. a>i- -Lft .-0 vo3° Intn ] o � u,uom Cm}^ "I d e+,, L LVC ali0 tl: a1CL t. a7 O °Q.O G pCi`.. ? n (Np'C w uOi 7 C'C Y n 'E L (J L E m L N N+-+ . tl y yR o tv y 1,1 N. `• a) ro O 0 +,Y L L L� U� y aI b N o. L ai C >> ',a+^d N L D m 0 N m C. tn > L G'O U - _LLB- C Q G ti y..N 4_ :.. U. .0 u v x G V acs C .1ia J3.1^Y L+' C+-' L. U a.-• „Z -aa •n ._ C N L C E m N (0 u ,oD 4m «N.:J N,t,t ,r N o m -Y•-. 0. > u_ G =y ua. yoNn �" � rnro`1c cyU cQ m o « 41 m w ts. as ro N .� c cra c = rn+'�. cY o ° ai r t° u O aNi > fL-L�: cL0 > m'� C •t- U'v Ct0 C-Zm � �,,ov NL Y. L++•mpS �«• Via.. 4>i X C 54 L E E "' ""U °; U t��3Y, vl udi- 4° �.. uvi w to 0,0 m.fl E N �,as t: •� ro ° ro m 4.. o m x t: u N E m=.L•�.. tl(D w 4) u E N4-'U c L`�'� N N L a1 O•" 07 O ,t7 a1 m O O t- ,0 m •'•" _ ° >«4, N0m m > u �._ u N— c `rLOoD. C >. 1 f0al4- m C m N N •_ U L = L o. ,,,,� c m IP .0 C CL 41 mS' uLn 4i; 05E.m+uOO aroiNY COL'y � E L7uG N L o Q.3 ro m N U w N U.N.'..- CSI I-z n .QA m L d ca a E L. 10 V is GL7 a "' t)'I Y Q,N - R y= ., � ecs� ro } 0cO7• s+ cswu CQN iq C N C Q• ° of E tIl C m C S++ , L N a7 N.t] �+ d C 't3 C-^ N CmaJ_4 tits -C ME C0C cu 0 a. o i'cjOH> >` [T al o N > C o � 7 UL� d� 3•,; opL s aY�w �' m Lp1C.. >tn snar='� NwQI `Y° mro ?s� E� ° mNN o'C � Ear C 'd o N C, In L.Z N E'u E m n u mLmLco3_� wm a - m � da ° omarov•- Cal,ti-- +- _ �' LEcmo t1. Cl OM Qm E N Y Q O u V n tl L U w�+ 3 4- N O«+ O m tl to N 4- . i - O 41a1 N >. N 1 0M to Cmv III (lo NO'D N t- r., L m L o... L all M... m N U m.0_C.C.0+' O it tn m (D. GN ° = a c ►'ro L m ar0 Ed .Y NC N wbX m h to 41-0 V UN 0w7O NO Y p �U LasY� .�` 0.noO'oM V a) N OC � m Lam_ a E Cw N ° t- N � O-.� O-W. u °� 0 R u r m E _ a '��m,3 t2io+fIV+ Y L 1tn t-ytD E to IV ',wC1_' v 3 .t: m•- U •0GO to d °a Dt'N L.'_. MCU. L C:aN >O N to .0 m a U U m © �� wL. -�•tyw cIj L ro � >. a oCLcoN %n 0U • aE 4-y au O•C.--0"= N >.0 > oN o Y b — u a m c u im 4Z— cn mdE NQ U. C d ro =G4- ' c � 3° ° ) c ° L- ocm a W = oo • ; 7 iy 00 acs C M , z CL G3 a� a1Coo p._ L o i aJL LCN tL O was vC^ nYC ,t�-- mELm C ¢ fO61 tiuO 1 NCLf1 OEyioroU0a) � f0o3m� LOCy N G t a M N rgoN m L yCo co O8lCo� wE' `um EF- top to � a GL v d+c+ c to vtL m '� p ;;Yw4 On' U-OQ. O b v C 'O C «'CO.v LU m t,y+•' ro tl +°.,,O D ¢ w E �. E a C m N = d ol'N L_ w ai ay N Nt: m a � O m a) N U1 c3iNYaC-•� N� x0 j > 87 ° O++ flfOC ov vo ° u do noN mnE _ aY a5 - axo+, ° C ¢ sU m u> � a o+-13 c u 0 L a a c ud p C Ry d a ::`m fl?? = m aCa 7 :1 u u 0.2u a >-@o41 > OJ04) 0W 0 � 6 +� mtl a. 0-ul N -L3 m N._ (� Y¢ NC1 L3 ¢ r+:�•O u'a GLG H5>i 14 r, 0-4 m a, '0 arc w LN.W Z 0 c d E V � .Wy ol i o c m E Ul "« O tRy�a W 00 L E ^J V1 anE m � Qt W s+ 41 o acorn 'c V _ J EOv 7 =tn W U. :w > L. W N d� � N U Q r N C O sf0°d y c AI " c ,m L •C� L a�� d — CO �•OC :tn = O O�.+ �+ Cf > > tmn? C m r C�_ 'a Sly c N 3 U 0 VSaL+ O cc O1 C L_A m 4, 0 C a L L E in C) CuL WO C4j m " p,0. " 47s+z eaCd Cl > > ?� i0 •Cmc V s0+ yin ct 3yam Z w ww 0 nYC a:-00 �., C._ N .�„ C = Ip C d in v.m o L t3 y m +L,:° L a LIDm� u �' m ,nLc ce C Cu mf: > .� u xym T " mC �c Mat y> aCiom > C> > m = M E � mC, old GE am� d L p N = W 4L 61 rn.M 4, m. C 1L1 L. U m o L CN = .03tn ago o yNo w a � u 641 Y rna w 3 c� 0c v v� u_ m c.� c U � m.1., �{- C,,oJ3 ago n= 0) + .Q U C >ro C O7Lc.E°� N3LaNi > > �y� .Gaai a N ` C d•E. m O 3'a N C777..'O, C,a?.C � 'q� GNiA. CvaO C y� M ... O � ,°nm ul C C� uL �roE 19 pC ; >. (D " E O L i 0 m 5 ai 3 a� c.(GJ 6) a L O7 ` > oo y cna+ C �lLcil ¢ Ly �Lm W InY U, m O 0 0. m mti i? U> Eco I' I' �Y L E.Q N CO)�t1 M D «+ E L u�a+M Clip. F- y ' w z Ci u�r.ra,- N ro C M DD lV M E o N a eta,n li 4 r. U3(L L d `y ^ NnNaO1i n 7 � Cp tGON « z 0 D .-MNM O � C y D L Wm M<U cc L O OM N ttn 4JU M�'O0' to O.OinQQiODM O NCO171.�'efJ r.. D O� V Q¢ N M N? 1+C4 al CM= N N M . Y d r1 N d U = •u v � ui ^ .O . d^p d �U d z N O u xiv Vp.rpro N u m maU z_ CL p o a _ C o � '» + C Q 0, E a) CroIL p CO LG E E E R v;,= z aD d u.� r. Q LM p Lr o p 43 U ' �` + U U w�a Q q ¢ a N t71 n_ < a oY -� L�cam_ x N �•�.p� C y V 'V L 10 6 tOi1 VI N Y 4.C J C '^ W °3 E Ea w 0: 41 LL). 7 N�Q- iq p'7 0.i0 in" tq.._U a x EEAU �vNd7 t/lA0 t- D'0.0 1 p' �• a z u c�t�zacr a cnt�av)u. 0 _ AML IN. ` C \� �U o 0 � a C a C a `� C � a LO > N 1 \ Q cc �l @ CL ® Gg� h W is h cE l >.a1Lol at >.— Lr > Cr- L to . tywy r m y u! ..Y+,'.0 O S L::R m O C Rf 41 O �. G at', o f L C d u o f°a!! ae C E C 1 QI aL a �� m� dE s , d a, a o> >.clnA � ut m c.N N� fD B E d m L.a c o as 1^ d G—•q o L LyCL ._' sn Wit+CioC mw'"�jII>. ,.a c gNpyai' R r. w a._ C ae o > 'O cr v .' vt tt' 3 ae Ln IV >.al ems+ O V N u ae 4e >.w C L w O E a C O O 41 O{Z. �_ •j N J-'ou� B.�Iu3NJRjpOLO L. cn 4C1 � L .�C 1w0 O .a.O m r N >'y`,�.o OL D CL 43'fl .00LO vex Lin ,� Z E CII. L� GL.G�tio > ya,� w `vv'Om� InClromA >> Cr {+ rH "Lxm ZO� 3L +t0+ a L LTjo . — �nm C L. > o Ea a v a' LC . OE yE d._.+ o eo�- ro L >.N ro = N y s C.•3 d L a+ 'O Sae � 43 c vym33— � E EL . o E +- a� o c � C C roCOCcc eo�pyp�t3NR0 SIu a w0ic to yu, mmC*'y" ivv E Iq V r m 3x� m m^O a� �of c�i•O.3rVI �_ 4 G C N C. N�,.w N +'C'' Q.�allli L71 i9 ZT LO. L n C C L V ul w U C 1 gut ut_4 >.3 o0 J 'a O 13 b O C V o .0 t=!n R y N w �;+.O-C'a ME +-' t0 W to L 3 ae" G•'- L � rn v...l!-� 3— 3"�7 & m ".c 3 c,G.c=o«. ,A pC'9 N t0 C= m p+' ai a au':� ccuw 3 3 m a o �_ Q `° o o �V uzj 7 C 3 a+ p@ 07 L E ?�O >— O N O a7 C L_ 111 cv 3 u+L+ c D 3 a� t'o in �p c c`sLn c�vth v W 3 o�.u1�' jU c c0 ul CL L C C•c .oC9Ud.o 3 yCfaC tL C �C0= > O 1 0 r{{ GL vl to a/(.�_'o >r v- ah- F-�.' rn i0 k- c� E d�-u H7�f I CJl Q4 r Z U.1 . Ut C V L t7! i N� MOrNs r.a sa CA 0 C j aO1 C�M M 1" O7. n M a pi 16 fU U 61 s 1n. h-D a%=r.MM m t� N :sCc: 3 t0 Owe W Ui j Q. . CL 1 e- O C - ls-, F E -0 z_ u 2 L tJ � a� Z a) 0 m Iv' 87~ w w a L '" U_ "' c m cn a oo�= i'> � Eo x o E 3 0 a iu J w Oa r. _ms�awa rvr,r o 1Oi1 �� .w U C M m aI Ill +' N coto m m 1s w N a�1 Iv 11 = w O cn y ,- O G1 O' as cn t�m in n�» N P 11 �- O'd-al U >.L � m .+ Zen c m o u`o'N= u J C(7m� dU Qlrc g dul� i � 0 D 1i L-� U L IY g � �• U}o,E d p C V O. o a _ In C O L td C to U N L.=+ �..� . 1 U9 O cn Men c%in N C4 M Al to C OA t,�,. C h F L 3 --r o o'N.1�1n to uj ti L Im-- C UI C w aCi N mO r.�Ns al Ra,Um E.� C4 NMN NN�. �S S- 11 .,.a��Ol MQ y f" 3 1�n s.`t 1Lo�A U < �'�' O .O ++ U a) •"'�' C w O F J r4 4- C aT3amC G3Oo o L. CNL yE�LL o p.y''+ IV + Qp ' 1 3 F d of o !t C >B 3 Q m ML) Ln z o 01++ .3A.¢QQIn Lo a 3 C co z m� ie to N to to ,T G UI O to O d a., tt1,- Ws- oCOCOCOmCO ____ r. E 0 4O, CC? �'CCN WC®1Z v U1 u�.N e-.-N�- �.'� L C d R �Ol . t lY Q U. U L. C� C! U G W d N 3 m0LL,N0E LLC to m mu.� 3 > `" L $!0a Y Z+y-�� M j-,, .OaOy OcO.L�3 CL 'O"'= L 1 o c cN�l r .N- O (ua•r R 3 N t71 IJI L O lZ t �J({f M! N co C N 4>.[? O L E_ I� \J 3 0.0 :), . >. µ. L v 3 0 in d 1--- Og O �, C fD. L O-� t �L n' a, Ciao M- c Otn ul - Ot to II — C cN O 7 aCic�o3vC �C� (D ,CnM i F r c C 0 'ls E�'D Z:. 1 c 9.1. L L.— 1 0 m CD ADt. w d ro teN s._ — i1 ar V C O! is u:—.G �„.Q F .OQ cp O 0 w.� to N C .-+ m m=_ m An L L > CI. m 00 > ao to J°' � u 0 G LO. Y7 ma>7 0— fl•C two >� 0.CL O Z mN EXw a @.+ mCM= to y " ++ P ceu c°' tQ- > L. 'aCN> clar > mLo"^ o C mom '"= m >� L , m i] oc= om`4"vim "'t".- >. m E d.C 'p m�•oO C.w CC.1N CyL�",'>' rO..'C r0 m`•" wO �N lt:+ G LIi 3 ism of ` a C ;= c).m <° c L v Rd O+w^�C) LY L- L� m� t �•j*+ NC �V..' An ] ar L. C 4) AD0 cp �L r _ =v w� a4) CLr0 An E o v i E av E _ u > ALAn > m u � .� Ca � O � pLa ut >-- L *• " ° CD ai ul a E a w rn mQ c cu" m rno. '1C 4.' p C.= a 0 L t� m :T Ll.0 E t a N �.L VI (LO E+. M o -41 - 1`if ntcLY E'C[1 r » G .+ a so. IDN cCo v > N m ac o ca,. o n C rn p i aw U >.— An An dL'— C «0 at.L.+!, 2, ar � 3 m t iO dG ` >N o •" TAD An EE•� _ > o " Cs L rntn oL � a yacn m. a i '1301C> mcn aCa E 4. {/IQim i4 C^ Ctn a, c u c of o - AD m d�o _ c v v c o w e imuuoi"o-B3oaLi °I`� mu-oi ya 4) colay �C w oEE '� u a � L1 tT, at0i ro sf0�. C7UJ-� o� E as M*z Ea-o mo a E �€ aLwU c.a c «.� AnX 1 =ooCmc a E o 3 7 L C U L +'0 0 N E Q U L m 0 C c N C E Qy m 41 p Xp a1 ++ o uw o m d O y E M C m O L E Ol Ct U) O.0 O0I O.yOL L.0 y— W t MEoof- L +� � N•' Ny �4-c � > ro > .. CC 3mo CytQ� o. pi+ 1DMJ3OL II. L71 d C m C. C1� L d � L to o 0GwUlGal 7 0) L. c Q.o.='o > o ro U m OY C os AD t+ > C_' o m O.� a L:S .`>.) c 0 V � � m m oLLi m� CO AD 41p� o X E•N uc0+r=+ 0- a0. toL ++ a ECJ� EC > cr C S E L O M C u V Luz to L C rota. t�-�'.cwEomUu3 • aa ' ZED gas UMW ' 4L am co J� CD U CA P �1 Ul 3N �0 CL 0. ! N IL p. yCY ir CL 0 f a CO co I 0co Cf. `f dim z l $ 0 I a a)4. L.4+ N L„C d,p O O,C U V L-u O.'C.. C as C C L la C m s 0in0 raa'ia 1041] 3mL4:¢om m o 'nvam c o CL CL o o 3,_ Ox = d o a o m •3 al m'�' J1.0 M O b 1C710 d) d.00'� C L 3+''M-�-'.4L- ''O'' t+'C- m> CL O _o.0 N L C m N .+ ar ar •N.G N Q as N. L v C m•p,G U al i.G N O =a 0 C N N N p 4. C .f�. Cn O L u itf,--CL.0 QJ L C.CU _ ..c O +'.-. O CL 0 m'fl m 3'p it► :{w o +''t .t] 7.� EEO t+ O m 'C 1 ,. .q 9�' m r'� In Up m- O �r°+ m.w010C^ tUpCp. e m .. ua.- m (a 0QQ'wEuEuc � op0 CL a-0-a m 3 LLN Q&- 61NNUC4ate. L cU7w `� CG pl0NOQJ C t0CN4.i, C CD c� ,� CC >'° L� a1 E- L �' aCONUrm CL c '0 m mCm ° IgmU mr a!_ NL L..0 t+ a),• C C 'i''Cp3a al jpU a) 0 L ,�6a1 C CL M...0 L'Cj- L S,m m O m'}' N t>+'C 4- L� t,,. .0 u a7 E 4. p d O m d a:,4..0 6i L.—u CL _ O U al L to a.0 v. tm+ ,C f0 O °t+ C ° O o'alo'.�'.q L. aT m R L 'a al 3 a_'. C M :_^4.'mo •�• "c"=°.0 >G.ya!Lm'� Ow �yCl3H �,L� �E.J � p0 � a `c°= m. °u uu ~ mom'a 43 � m E u o 0-L-13 'aCL>. 0 ��`�°C Q `L- �' v aDmm•- cLraoOc: o 00,CU 4- > 0-^ ai°'4- i tea, M O «r n �ro "' � F-r m ° vd a U'O C m 'rr�a+ m aE1�A C N > ° in .a C.y.:+'oQ0J3 MT) Lm0 Ny'Do�Ud..Uu.- N'Qa- `-' E ° m ,-aaw Ln w'3 _ On 1- R++'ma cai a o"01-°°;�03cL aL Mc' Lo CtZ j.CL�� l n 0 > k 1 C L+' > O 0 Ws ttnC fl N CLU N a, 0 a, a ; °4'w F Q�� > Nom.EcUC� � �_ u azccc`9 O C t+ �'.0 d 14 C�" >.C L C R O O a1 O to m.G m. LL— 3 E"°.— U u►4. O r..+ N�.- N U F t+ m m 7 M a L m m N a).0 41 a) C'f U N O m•I•U 1 a? L, a7 .0 al 0 41 4+ Cn . O 0Y 0'� N.X oW - mu >rCL c -wtaoSlECo U��-.Cmt[fCd'a �tiOa7L a COS.- N C mC NC LUr4 ey m m+' _ aCt+ L > o +1 t1 O_ al G 0)4- c °' m °'a °r'> dfOdfir' m� c3a cduUwcy a) CwO,.+ U N C Et CUL 4. pm > NLa) C .0 C °� da �mLLm '"CLX ° dwm�LLs tiX—= C:t. � d •a L?.G"' C 'o C al N N m O C._ NG >^ tam oSal LOC O Eti JNr3 O � mCL 0so N� >� � Ada,f'•4� 's'Eo N—:al °_>d LtN Q7 u1NC OaI m s= ID 0 s oam 3 � vi 'r°� dL3r4. E��_ muaiEo al N.a 9 M.p m 61 E O+°+ O L 1- O " tsl-a C p y c°o3aa) � �,mFLO. �4�"3v�L. ame 0. "FW- aa,„ �oammacuy tC; m� °'0EEmas- tz d ma GfC 4. NCL E3 � ma. o uI- EXjrC--++ > pt"0m?, ,.N, O > 0ar' mu°piO.CC0M -tC' Ocu 2 c° to'� E aci Ql wV3La'N > ocyoC CCjNn VICL^+E+=yo ta< C 0.o u O E C j o.O m E�a o"� � m c a .10 c m p=m m m 0 0 c E C p.0 a CL L -p_ w w 0 r r.c - _ °,_ O1 m o a C C++ n. as o a) N a.0'o N c l r ,"a E m 'o 'pO yCrna >_ cu° cm °'� mo3�?� Ld7t, d > 6 , olctt y t,,4- al,_ '" a O d.'C-, C ..'C., N m N .O"_tC+ i O.M, m:G 0'Op�.>', E yjO O � oL73 a"-O 0) ++ maLi v0•� .,pl-yp [l .>.mLC � 0.0 < 'VIt al E N •tm-, O'_ m.C2 N m ° y C�.u�.. al .0 CS .0 H aN+ N O m CL O d 1 O3 at+ OLo �y udd� E -+� 3=° pmn>i rCN r+ ms ca�4 c« G? L atl `° o'N c> m v o `o N o o=a CL -CU fQ - .+ p c ow t L. > > m O MM v oa L- E `0 -- a, >., a"- a3 3 uLn C U A Ln V L t O m C 4. L `� - U,0 +�.L U > v O a) 'Op m �N.L C.µ LL. N L�' .0++N,W ?, Ia. L , m m m C m m CL L L;µ — H— au m r_ a, N aa, vac � CL oLL4. pay Q � tOCN 'yuNl- O 4�--.COLN G.� EL�� ML"NE �— mL' N C l V Old O L d C!'_' C O OC > =U L OEw 3'C +Q p E > w > a! +�4Li m a 0 y 4-4- O p C4- al.0 m > > L. > oomm- mo'o... > -rJ] NE- art, EUmc : - 0m.cumm^a amao RECORDING REOLESTZ3 BY, A0 WHEN RECOROED, RETURN TO- LEWIS HOMES V� � ATTN; Lega' Department 1 1156 N. Mocntair Avenue Post Office Box 670 Upland, Ca 91786-0670 TERRA VISTA PARK OViFLOPMcNT ArorrmcNT NO 1 ( This terra Vista Park Development Agreement No, 1 (the "Agreement") is made the 7F), day of J�,,.5 , 1984, by and between LEWIS CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.,a California corporation,WESTERN PROPERTIES, a general partner- ship, LEWIS HOMES OF CALIrORNIA, a general partnership, and LEWIS DEVELOPMENT CO., a general partnership (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Lewis"), and the CITY OF RAeCHO CUCAMONGA, a Municipal ;orporatiorr (hereinafter referred to the "City"), RECITALS A. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is an incorporated general law city existing under the laws of the State of California. B. Lewis controls certain real prc?e,•ty within the City which is known as Terra Vista and which is referred to herein as the "Planned Community". This Planned Community inelud,,s an area of land beginning at the intersection of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard; thence traversing north along the canterline- of Haven Avenue to the south right of way of the Pacific Electric Railroad; thence east to the easterly boundary of the 'Jeer C-Cek Flood Control Channel; thence southwesterly along said boundary to the centerline of Base Line Road; thence east to the centerline of Rochester Avenue; thence south to tic. centerline bf Foothill Boulevard; thence west to the beginning point, being the intersection of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. i C. On the 16th day of February, 1983, the City adopted Ordinance No. 190, approving P.,nned Cv munity Zone No. 81-01 for the Development of the Planned Community. By that action the City Council established that development within Terra Vista should be "regulates by the adopted j Planned Community Text entitled Terra Vista and in part by the Rancho Cucamonga Zoning Ordinance.` That text shall hereinafter be referred tc as the "Community Plar". Terra Vista Development Agreement llo. l page 2 i i D. Lewis seeks to develop the Planned Co,-mnity in the manner contem- plated by the Community plan and by law, and desires that the City, acting through its Council, make certain determinations and decisions a regarding the development of the Planned Community %nich are related to the exercise of City powers pursuant to the Comunity Plan and the Municipal Code. 1. Article 2.5 of Chapter 4, division 1. Title 7 of the California Government Code consisting of Sections 65864-65869.5 authorizes the City to enter into binding development agreements for the development of real property with persons having legal or equitable inte,sts in such property. Lewis and the City desire to enter into a development agi emem With respect to development of public and private park and ' r:creational area in Terra-Vista-and procet:ings have beer,unde^taken i In compliance with applicable rules, regulations, and laws. City and , >- L_wis acknowledge that the Code states that a development agreement i shall contain, among other things,. terms and conditions related to .the permitted uses of the property, the density or intensity of use, 1'. III the maximum height and size of proposed buildings, and provisions for reservation or dedication of land for puaiic purposes," The topics of f permitted uses of the Terra Vista pr—erty, height and size of ' s bu, sings, as well as reservation or dedication of land .,,r public purposes (except for the public park and recreatitrai areas affected _ by this Agreement), are not relevart to the subject matter herein contained and therefore are not included in this Agreement. A< x between themselves the patties intend to he contractually bound and desire that the provisions of agreement be governed by than: Article I 2.5, and they therefore waive any objections regarding the sufficiency of this Agreement with respect thereto. 1; F. The City acknow;edges that by electing to enter into contractual I E agreements such as this one, the obligations of which shall survive beyond the term or tern.. )f the present City Council members, that such action will serve to bind the City and future Souncils to the i obligarlans undertaken in such agreement, and shall limit future i exrrt',e of certain governmental and proprietary powers of the City, -Z(t+ 1- jL M� Terra Vista Development Agreement No. 1 Page 3 The terms and conditions of this Agreement have been found by City Council to be fair,just,and reasonable, and the Agreement is thereby intended to bind Lewis and the City for its duration. ! - l r G. In obligating the City pursuant to this Agreement, the City Council has elected to exercise certain governmental and proprietary powers, and in exercising these powers at the present time, rather than A deferring such exercise to some undetermined future Fate, the City Council has determined that the City is acting within the law and 4' within the powers granted pursuant to the California Constitution and statutes prtmulgated thereunder, and has concluded tha; the economic interests of the City and its citizens, as well as considerations related to public health, safety, welfare, and v-joyment will be best served by this course of action. 'i. The City wishes to facilitate implementr.tion of its General Plan and the Community Plan. The elements of this Agreement are oamed to be major ash important steps in furtherance of comprehensive planning objectives contained within those documents. The planning objectives f which are advanced throq h this Agreement include the City`s goals: i (1) to provide park and open space areas for Terra Vista, Ij (2) to provide a reasonable balance between parks and horsing as the ) Terra Vista Planned Community develops, Via) to insure that parklerd in the amount contemplated in the General Plan and Community Plan will be available in the P1a.,ned Community as it develops without regard to the outcome of future litigation or legislation which might result in changing the I , original intent of the park and open space concept were it not ; for the provisions of this Agreement. S t I. The City Council has found that this Fgreement is consistent with the General Plan of the City k J the Community Plan of the Terra Vista 1 Planned Community. ' . 1 T-,r r Terra Vista Development Agreement No. I iage 4 / J. On�! _1t,nW In , 1984, the City council of Rancho Cucanibnga adopted Ordinance NO. -.:r appraving this Terra Vista Park Development Agree- mcnt NO I and authorizing the ur'ersigned Mayor and City Clerk to execute same and by that action bind the City thereby. Said Ordinance took effect l.•1 / 1984. 1 w " NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION f" THE MUTUAL COVENANTS AND AGREEMENTS HEREIN CONTAINED AND OTHER G009 AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATIONS, the parties }' ' I heretG agree as follows: 1. This Agreement shall be effective and the obligations of the parries hereunder shall arise only as of the Effective Dat•:of City Ordinance No. 917 , thereinafter referred to as the "Effective Date") which er+' Ordinance authorizes the City to enter into this Agreement, and shall terminate thirty (30)years thereafter or at such other Cime as may be agreed upon by the parties. This Agreement is entered ,nto by Lewis 3 in order to assist the City in satisfying the planning objectives of ` the General Plan and the Community Plan and in consideration oqF the City exercising certain governmental and proprietary powers at the time of execution of this Agreement rather than at some future date. 2. The City confirms it has adopted and agrees it will administer according to its terms that certain Park Implementation Plan for Terra i Vista attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this refer.nce, hereinafter referred to as the"park Plan" , 3. i L �e s agrees to dedicate and/or reserve for park and recreational i .purposes certain areas in the Planned Community according to the provisions of this Section 3 of this Agreement. It is agreed that park exaction ,,quirements for the entire Planned Community pursuant to the General Plan, the Community Plan, City Municipal Code Section 16.32. or any supplemental laws, regulations, or policies are, and shall bo, binding on both Lewis and 'he City as specified in the Park Plan. � I Terra Vista Development Agreement Ila. I Page 5 I 3.1 If the estimated Terra Vista population computed based on expected residential density as defined in Section 66477(b) of the Government Lode is projected to be higher or lower than K anticipated, requirements for the portion of the Planned Com:mnity not yet developed shall be increased or decreased, not _ more often than biannually, in the manner described in the Park G ' Plan. 3,2 In the event that certain density bonuses are granted as a result of agreements by Lewis or any other builder in Terra Vista to build affordable residential housing, or for any other reason. } any areas included in such residential developments which qualify 'c to meet that proiect's private open space requirement pursuant to this Agreement shall not tie deemed to be an incentive provided Rpursuant to Government Code Section 65915 et sea. by the City for affordable housing. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as prohibiting the City from waiver of park exaction requirements for affordable housing projects. I 4. Each party agrees that so long as the other party is not in breach or T default of th, provisions of this Agreement it will forever abide by provisions of the Park Plan regardless of changes In law. Lewi i hereby waives any claim that the park dedication and improvement requirements established herein may be in excess of what may be i legally required by the City. Each party further further agrees, so long as the other is not in breach or default of the provisions of (I this Agreement, not to participate, except to defend itself, in any i litigation related to the Park Plan or this Agreement in a role adverse to the other. i r ` 5. City shall review this Agreement at least once during every twelve- ` „ month (12-month) period following the Effective Date hereof, in accordance with Government Code Section 65865.1. i I S. City specifically agrees that :t has no right or power whatsoever to require tcwis to begin development, or continue development once • I r, " Terra Vista Development Agreement No. I ' Page 6 begun, of the Terra Vista Planned Community, and that the park and recreational dedication requirements of Section 3 of this, Agreement t will only be met in the event and to the extent. that the Planned Community is actually developed. 7. This Agreement shall be enforceable and performed according to its v terms, and shall be govurned by the Park Plan in the form incorporated herein, notwithstanding any subsequent amendments which may alter or amend City's rules, regulations, or policies governing parkland f dedication or development. During the period of this Agreement the City shall not undertake to reduce the Planned Comnunity base density ct mid-range density as originally adopted in the Community Plan below f 8000 dwelling units. The parties acknowledge that the Community Plan specifies that the total number of dwelling units in Terra Vista shall not exceed nine thousand two hundred_(9,200) units. Notwithstanding ,11 the foregoing, however. Lewis and the City may at any time in the future mutually agree in writing to amendments to the Community Plan and/or this Agreement regarding any of the provisions contained herein. 8. In the event of alie,)ed default or br«Lir of any terms or conditions of this Agreement, the party alleging such default or breach shall i give the other party not less than thirty (30) days' notice, in w,—Ring (the "first notice"), specifying the nature of the alleged default and the n3nner in which such default may be satisfactorily cured. In the event such breath or default is not cured during such period, the non-defaulting party may enforce this Agreement by j arbitration as provided herein, or by bringing an action in law or equity, and the parties agree that subject to the limitations contained in Section 6 hereof, specific performance shall be an appropriate remedy to be sought. 9. In the event that any state or federal law or regulation enacted, idopted, •: interpreted ± date of this Agreement, or Judicial determination or other action of any governmental entity not under the control of City. shall excuse,, prevent or preclude compliance with any. Rev. 052284 ,.�� iGy F� Terra Vista Oevelopnent Agreement flo. 1 a Pd9e,- i of the provisions hereon, such provisions shall nevertheless only be t' excused, and shall only be modified or suspended, to the extent and for the time � icessary to achieve any mandatory compliance with said law, regulation, determination or other governmental action, and the I' remaining provisions of this Agreement shall be in fall force and 3 effect. Upon repeal or invalidation of said law, regulation, deter- mination or other governmental action or occurrence of other circum- stances removing the effect thereof upon this Agreement, the s, provisions hereto shall be restored to their full original effect. 10. The parties agree that this Agreement shall not bind any lender _ providing construction or permanent financing for any improvements in 4- the Planned Community, nor an f y developer of non-residential subdivi- sions. No provision hereof shall defeat, render invalid, or limit an I. y G mortgage, deed of trust, or similar recurity interest applicable to r i + such improvements or development, and the parties agree to negotiate in good faith to modify any oU the provisions of this Agreement based on reasonable requests by the other party, lending institutions, title companies bond counsel or similar categories of interested persons. 10.1 At the time Lewis is entitled to obtain building permits for any work of construction in Terra Vista, and upon written request, ± the City will-issue in a form suitable for recordation a Certifi- cate of Compliance with respect to the real property to be so improved. The Certificate of Compliance shall constitute, and shall so state, cdnclLsive determinatio, of satisfactory comple- tion of the requirements of this Agreement y ith respect to the property to which it slates. After issuance of such Certificate °r� + of Compliance, •hitch issuance may not be unreasonably withheld, l iar any party then owning or thereafter purchasing, leasing, or otherwise acquiring any interests in said property shall not incur any obligation or liability under this Agreement. 11. Either party may elect to arbitrate any dispute arising under this 1 Agreement. In the event of such e3ection, the procedure of this Section shall constitute a binding and unappealable tl procedure for L I - R`3 a Development Agreement tlo. 1 pace a arbitrating and resolving any such dispute. Electior of either party j to arbitrate shall be made by filing a demand in writing with the l: other party. The demand shall be made within twenty (20) days after the occurrence of the event causing the dispute, or within ten (10) w' days after the first written notice b either y party that further q negotiation is unlikely to result in a compromise resolution of the 3 matter. �fY If Lewis and the City agree on the sr;''ttion of an arbitrator, there shall be only one arbitrator. If no agr.+ement is reached within ten (10) days after demand for arbitration., there shall be three (3) i B ; arbitrators.:one named in writing by Lewis and a second by City and a tt..; chosen by the two who are appointed. If the two so chosen i cannot agree an a third within ten (10) days thereafter, either party c.` may petition the San Bernardino County Superior Court to appoint an i arbitrator, who in that event must be a fP 7-,-r California Superior Court Judge. If there is one arbitrator, his decision shall be r binding; if there are three arbitrators., the decision of any two of them shall be binding. NO one 5'all act as an arbitrate, who is in any way financially interested in the work or business affairs of either party. ' Should either Lewis or the City refuse or neglect to appoint an t arbitrator within twenty (20) days after the initial demand for arbitration or to furnish the arbitrators with any necessary papers or if information, the arbitrators, one or more, appointed in compliance Le w4th this Section, are empowered by both parties to proceed ex parte. The decision of the arbitrators shall be final. The arbitrators, if they so deem, are authorized to award to the party i whose contention is upheld such sums as they deam proper for the time, c expense, and trouble incident to the appeal, and, if the appeal was i taken without reasonable cause, damages for delay. The arbitrators shall fix their own compensation, unless otherwise agreed on, and shall assess the costs and charges of the arbitration on ,zither or both parties. j Te< :a Development Agreement No. I Page 9 1 12. This. Agreement, upon becoming effective in the manner he•lin provided. constitutes the sole and only agreement bet:<en the parties as to the seb3ect matter hereof, and is intended by each to constitute the final 1 written memorandum of all of their agreements and understandi rigs,in this transaction. No covenants, warranties, and/or representations, express or implied, and no promises or prior agreements what'oever have been made, agreed to, or entered into by the parties which are s_ not expressly set forth herein; and if either party has attempted to make such covenants, warranties, and/or representations, ptbmises, cr prior agreements, the same are each superseded hereby and waived.. ,s. •XE 13. The parties hereto are acting as independent eE_ities and this Agree nent shall not constitute a partnership, agency, or other busines3 r.� relationship between or among them. 14. All notices and demands which may or are to be required or permitted to be given by either party to the other hereunder shall be in writ- ing. All notices and demands may be personally served or shale be ` sent by United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the address herein designated or to such other,place as a party may from time to e time designate in a notice given in accordance with this paragraph. 15. Each provision contained herein shall apply to and bind the heirs, successors, executors, administrators, and assigns of all the parties hereto. 16. In the event of arj action or proceeding brought by any party against any other under tii>Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover all reasonable costs and expenses including the fees of its attorneys in such action or proceeding in such amount as the court may 6 adjudge reasonable as attorneys` fees, whether or not the proceeding y' continues to judgment. is 17. Time is of the essence for each provision of this Agreement of which time is an element. w t. `r Terra Vista Deve(tment Agreement Nn• ( t" Me 11r 18. The Recitals to this Agreement are, tncnrp,n.u,•,t ,,,,.,•,.. ,.t py this reference made a part hereof, fi 19. This Agreement, or a memorandum thereof, in ,r turn acceptable to the parties hereto, shall he recorded in the Official Records of the County of San Bernardino within ten (10) days after the Effective Date ihereof, 20. Except as to matters expressly provided for herein, and notwithstand- ing the provisions. tf Governme;., Ccde Section 65866, all rules, i regulations, and official policies g,wernivq permitted uses of land g and governing design, improvement,, and construction standards and specifications applicable to the planned community are subject to r change by City in the manner etherwi!ge provided by law. k,.gs IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement to be effective an the date herein provided. a "Lewis" 2% LEWIS CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. LEWIS DEVELOPMENT CO., n a California corporation a gereral partnership 1156 H. Mountain Avenue 1156 N. Moue£-vin Avenue Post Office Box 670 Post is ,Box 670// Upland, CA 91786-0670 Upland,' 91786-067' o�t2p u By �lt M'icside/nJt �8y ! uthorize gent rC By: is sistant ecretary i WESTERN PROPERTIES, LEWIS HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, a general partnership a general partnership 1156 N. Mountain Avenue 1156 N. Mountain Avenue r� Post Office Box 670 Post Office Box 670 Upland, CA 91786-06/70 1-4 f Upland, CA 91786-0670 A AtIthOrued Agent ,o,tr�ized gent "City" Authortied Agent CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a Municipal Corporation 3320 Base Line Road, Unit "C" ATTEST: Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 n By: I!/ 469 M r ity Clerk 1PW1dTh/91BWW, ar lZ OSZi:a Rev. OSZ48A f v-= i l 1 Cam- RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: Citr Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT ru— TERPA V11STA PARK DEVELdPMENT AGREEMENT No. 1 This First Suliplementa) Agreement.("Agreement-) is entered into as of the day ofi, 948� by and between Lewis Construction Co., ofI California,av On a 2enertltpartnership,and Lewis Developmenteneral �Co., aigeneral partnership (hereinafter, collectively, "Lewis"), and the City of Rancho1, Cucamonga, a w;,.iripal corporation (hereinafter, "City"). This Agreement is supplementil t�# that Terra Vista Park Development Agreement No, '1 (hereinafter, "#Ae Original park Agreement") effective as of the 7th day Of Jun,- 1984 r;7d adopted by the City pursuant to Ordinance Number 227, which ordinanci toi7c effect July 26, 1984. Lewis and the City are sometimes hen'Onpfter referred to individually as a "Party" and collectively as uthe Parties." RECITALS A. The Parties desire to confirm the fact that a certain site (hereinafter, "the School Site") within the Terra Vista Planned Community d (hereinafter "the Planned Community') consisting of approximately twenty (20) acres, described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto,presently owned by he Etiwanda School District (hereinafter, 'the S-.hooi District"),was not anticipated in the original Terra Vista Community Plan to be a location for residential development, a,id that the requirements for park land as set forth in the Original Park Agreement did not ccntemplate residential development of ti',e School Site. The Parties have been informed that the School Dibtr?_ti intends to convey the School Site to one or more residential developers, and consequentt; the Parties desire to establish both the allocation cF residential dei 0t_y with respect thereto and the park development requirements which shall apply thereto. B. The Parties desire that this Agreement supplement the Original park OriginaI Parkbut Agreement desire-tois arecndfshallirm hremaincintful'.as sforceppand effect the t accordance with its terms. MATTERS OF AGREEMENT In consideration of the foregoi-; and the mutual covenants herein contained, Lewis and City aark _,follows: 1. Change of Designated Use of School Property The School District is the �'—Present owner of the School Site, and has made application to the City for rezoning of said property to permit accordancere�Adential with la use w, h t , and hereof�Shallmakea determinations as to whether ctoipermit said use. At City's request, Lewis has made apDlication for approval of Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment No. 2, consistent therewith. 2. Dwelling Unit Allocation c The application by the School District for residential use of the SchoolSite Asa esult requestsroval thisf one hunred application, thennumber0ofddwellingwellinguunits reflected in Section 7 of the Original Park Agreement shall be increased to eight thousand one hundred twenty (8,120) at mid-range density and nine thousand three hundred thirty-eight (9,338) at maximum density, as a �- consequence of the fact that the School Site wad not anticipated to be , Agreement A Page 2 'ry developaale for any purpose other than as a school site at the time the Parties entered into the Original park Agreement. 3. park Imolementation . Park exaction requirements for the entire Planned Community shall be increased, as a result o€';he residential development of the school Site, at the rate set forth.in Section 3 of the Original Park Agree.-nent, 4, Confirnation Except as specifically set forth tierein, the Original Park Agreement is hereby confirmed by the Parties as :a full force and effect, and this Agreement Shall be subject to the unaarendr;d provisions thereof, IN WITNESS WHEREOF.the parties hei3ta have executed this Agreement as Of the date first above Written, "Lew#s" LEWIS CONSTRUCTION Co., INC. LEWIS OEYELOPMENT M. a California corporation a general partnership T56:N, Mountain Avenue 2256 N.Mountain Avenue Post Office Sax 670 Yost Office Sox 670 Upland, CA 91745 Upland,CA 91785 By: By, t5 Ice rest lent ut Or1Ze gen f By; , f� is sSlsTant eCretary_` ' WESTERN PROPERTIES, LEWIS HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, a general partnership a general partnership 1156 N.Mountain Avenue 1156 N. Mountain Avenue Post Office Box 67d Post Office Box 670 Upland,CA 91785 Upland. CA 91785 By: By, j rut orIze gen ut arTza gent { f "City" tt i CITY Op RANCN'l COCAMONGA., : a Municipal Corporation i 9320 Base Line Road, Unit "C" ATTEST; Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 By, . ayor ty ar II PJW:COL:dms/917YAA 0813% RESOLUTION NO. ' AN RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 86-01, TO MODIFY THE COMMUNITY- PLAN TEXT TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL SITE TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DU/AC) FOR 20 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ROCHESTER AVENUE, NORTH OF CHURCH STREET. WHEREAS, on the 8th day of January, 1986, the Planning Commission held a dulyadvertised s public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the € following fn- ings:- 1. That the sebject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land i use in the surrounding area; and ,f 2. That the proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and I� 3. That the proposed district change is in cohformance k` with the General Plan and the Victoria Planned Community. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this project wiTT not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on September 24, 1986. NOW, THEREFORE,,BE IT RESOLVED: - 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approvr9 of Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment 86-01. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment 86-01 to modify the Community Plan Text as indicated in the attached "Amendment No. 2 to the Terra Vista Community Plan." r Resolution No. Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment 86-01 r Page 2 f* APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1986. ' PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ennuis L. Stout, Chairman "— ` ATTEST: Brad Buller, epu y Secretary r �yr I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the PlOning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the fn'IzT_,ing ;Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commicsion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held_ j, on the 24th day,of September, iv86, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES CWISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 1 S` RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO. CUCAMONGA REOOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT TO TERRA VISTA PARK DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. I BETWEEN ' IY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND_ LEWIS CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.x A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, WESTERN PROPERTIES, A GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, LEWIS HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, A GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, AND LEWIS DEVELOPMENT CO., A GENERAL PARTNERSHIP. WHEREAS, the Planning Commissicit. following a duly held public hearing is recommending approval of the H rst'Supplemental Agreement to the City Council; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that the provisions of the ;proposed First Supplemental Agreement are consistent with the City's General Plan and the Community Plan of the Terra Vista Planned Community; NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Cgwission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve to recommend to the City Council approval of the attached First Supplemental Agreement. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: enais L. Stziut, Chairm9n ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution wat duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the city of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of September, 1936 by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCA'1,MGA STAFF REPOIRT F t �� Z DATE: September 24, 1986 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Pld�qning Commission x FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Cynthia S. Kinser, Issistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONK MAL NSESSMEU AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86-03A (' LAING . A request to :,men the-Me Plan' ar Use ap rat Fi o0o Control to Low-Mecti um Density Residential {11-8 du/ac) -for 40 .acres of lafysi located at ti .southwest corm arl,` ire _e n mos =f..Banyan and I it I i}:m—Md 1 I. ABSTRACT: Laing tWIM AWS lWtla ed-t$ General Plan Amendment rom YFood Control fin 'Low 14es7ium-Density Residential for 40 acres of land located on t'ie southwest *.orner of tha extensions of Banyan and Milliken (see Exhibit "A"). Staff has completed an Environmental Assessment and analysis of the proposal and recommends approval of the Amendment. II. FtOJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Amend the General Plan Land Use Map from F1aod_Contro1 to Lvx-Mediula ltesieentia.l. is. Location: Southwest corner of the extensions of Banyan and Ffif nWen. X. _Parcel Size: 40 acres of land. D. Existing Development District: Flood Control. E. Existing Land Use: Vacant. F. Surrounding General Plan Designations: or --P o1 a 6ontrol. _ South - Proposed high school, Flood Control. East - Low Density Residential. West - Low-Medium Density Residential. G. Surrounding Land Use and Development District Des' nations: North - acant; �10'od Control. South - Vacant; .)edium Density Residential. East - Single f'►mily residential; Caryn Planned Community. ` West - Vacant; Flood Control. ITEM I j. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 86-03A LAING HOMES September 24, 1986 Page 2 H. Site Characteristics: Vegetation consists of scattered trees, grasses, anTwee s, o,herwise vacant. III. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ANALYSIS: 1. Flood Control: The General Plan Land Use Map designates the project se as Flood Control. The purpose of this designation is to preserve land that is particularly subject to flooding and for pratection in other areas due to flooding. The General Plan states: "...portions Df the Ci v fall witMn the 100 year Flood Plain which is: an am of .land subject to potential irwndatijhs by ,�tcrosrr adxose Intensity_�c=s on .the average of mme efm '100 ykrars." "Upon Improvements to both Cucemaaga Creek and Deer Creek, flood hazard areas will be significantly diminished west of Milliken Avenue. Floodwaters in the City Have seriously damaged homes, vehicles, and roads, as riell as threatened lives. Moreover, the debris ::nd soil carried by the flood waters are deposited on lo:al streets, private yards, and drivewa, ,, resulting in significant maintenance and repair costs. The Deer Creek Channel has been completed and according to the Federal Emergency Manage,;ent Agency, the .project site is no longer subject to flooding. The land is privately owned and and may be considered for development (see Exhibit "D"). r2. School Facilities: Since the area immediately ad=:ac.:nt to the sub3ect site is esignated as a potential high school arr the General �• Plan, staff has contacted the Chaffey High School District for comments. The District indicates primary interest in another general location, but does express Potential interest in the subject site as r a secondary choice (see Exhibit "C") An issue is whether the subject site should retain its current Flood Control designation or whether it should be red-ignated for some - form of development. The site is privately owned, no longer subject to flooding and not needed for flood control purposes. The applicant is requesting a Low-Medium Density Designation. The School District is not requesting that the site be reserved as a school at this time. Should the City approve the proposed LM Designation, the High School District will have another opportunity to comment, if and when a subdivision map or a development project is filed for the site. At that time, the District would have the option of pursuing acquisition of the site if the primary location is no longer viable. �. -2- w z ; or PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 9C-03A LAING HOMES September' 24, 1986 Page 3 j 3. Land Use Compatibility: The site is adjacent to Low Z-Md Low-Medium ensi y Resiaential with Medium Density Residential along Highiand Avenue and the future Route 30 Fr.Aeway. The designation of Low Medium Density Residential appears compatible with the adjacent uses. The General Plan discusses this use as follows: "Low Medium (4-8 dwelling units per gross acre). The low-me lum category is characterized by residential densities somewhat greater than, the low density residential group. With gross densities averaging .; between 5-8 dwelling uni�s T"�r acre, considerably more ' housing tyres may _ use' Ansl.uding typical. single- family, singe-family 7A-, st line, duplex, and under certain conditions up to-,w , tovMhouse-type units. -This " od1d.' 0�7_ z;qrOlsrizb_z-wi#tiin 9aw dmrsity aireas to encourage greater housing diversity without changing the single-family `iiaracter of the surrounding residential character." IV. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The Initial Study has been completed By s a and significant adverse environmental impacts weia cansidered to be associated with the site. 4a V. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Should the Commission, upon examination of the enera an mendment, decide that this chaiige would promote the Land Use Goals and Policies of the General Plan and would not be detrimental to the adjacent-preperties..or cause significant adverse impacts as listed under the Environmental Assessment, the following findings are necessary for approval: A. ?lie Amendment does not conflict with. the Land Use Policies of the Genes,.. Plan, 'B. The Amendment does promote 'ie goals of the Land Use Element, and C. The ,Amendment would not be materially injurious or I detrimental to the adjacent properties. VII. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Daily Report newspaper and notices were sent to all property owners within JuU teez of the subject site. To date, onl.•, the aforementioned response from the Chaffey School District has been received. T-.� PLANNING COM,1�l'SJTO"i 'S�Af�F REPORT GPA 86-03A - LAING NOMES 7M7I,,,September 24, 1986 4 Page 4 � Y VIII. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the General Plan Amendment i as proposed. If. the planning Commission finds th4 Amendment warranted, adoption,of the attached Resolution recommending approval to 'he City- ` Council of the General Plan Amendment and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. '•t If the planning Commission finds that the requested Amendment is in conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and does not promote the Goals and Objectives of the Land Use Element, adoption of the attached Resolution of Denial would Jae appropriate. . Re e fullyub�mtte�i;� ~ City Planner { BB;CK:ko Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Subject Property. e Exhibit "B" - .General plan &Development Districts Exhibit "Cu - Letter from Chaffey School District Resolution of Approval Resolution of Denial F r� C ' }+ V c ,; VV a bdb W a- C Q cal -14 O v .. (24 z r a Im i e 14 k` ltx ter $ �`� Q®Q � s °p�'a� t �+ ktt a FD Subject Property(79 acret) Properry affected by SPA GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT SITE PLAN JOHN LAING HOIVEES DAT E Fft£AQRFb t 7--A faF ' ,r A �� Chaffey College = Suc3�Ec-r SITE rw yti - 11 * - 8 k. m }' - " o IV.i•'y Z' a X:w. ••� -_ , 9 ley yyy ap ....... .1 LMO LM LMO ME { '�;ARYN 1 :PL.ANN D; � ,OfVfrlUldl�'Y. _ I �• °° L33UUUDDUUUUUUUUU QUO LM. a o o L` o LM _ I • L. I FC VI CTQRIAo°PL Development Districts v v NORTH CITY Or, RAINCHO CUC Aid ONGA TITLE- PLANNING DIVISION —_6 EXHIBIT- t� SCALE- Fjc K le,1-r •r"' u1�toX C,HAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT ,4y ,fll l NEST FIFTH STREET,ONTARIO CALIFORNIA 91762-1698 (714)988 8511 ,,��--- Supenntandent of Schools Associaie Supenntandae. Assistant Superintendent C-Voi/ Mike O.Olrksen. : Admmistranonlpersonneh Instruction Dean E.Smathdrs Suite I,.Hanisnn �1$TA,Ui BOARD OF TRUSTEES:Kathleen E.Hint fy•Birt C.Martin•-Raymond J.Sarno Charles J.Uhatley•Gerald W.%Volf K SeptembeA 5, 1986 Atim};fSWAP—n, Auccimte Na11s1PJt. TI7Y_DF RANCW.'CUrAMOtIGA 7,0. Box 8D7 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 97730 s: RE: GeneAat Ptan Alaendme►tt 86-03A } in response to Ms. Lis, L.in.ingeA'A tetten. o6 Augu4t 13, 1986 Aegandzng :the pItopenty K o6 Mitti.hen north 06 Wghtand -- .the beat anzwen cue can give you. .is that the Cha66ey 7.iataict 1-6 eonsideAing anotheA paopenty as its 6iut choice but that the hfitZiken prtopea.ty wouQd ht.iF.tr be considered shouZd ouA ,}.inst ehozce not pan out. Be advised that were we to become more .intmested in the MiMk.en pnopeAty .it would be the noAtheAn 6onty acAe.6, pluz pn m.ivu,6 with no inteAest .in the zoutheAn poA.tion. i wish we could be move .6pec.i6.ic ,in ouA ne:ponse« '.-Strwte t y, S7EPHER L. BUTTERS AiAecton Buhinus SeAvieeb _ cn7.OF�AN�o Cb GR PLAPININD DIVISION - M SEP 08 1Jg 7►8r�11Ul11)}wt�r%I?14�.5p6 SLB/sb cc: Atvin S. KizaJeA _L }11jtY .lG tt 9CNOGL9: ALTA W)MA.CHAFFEYADULT EOIt.:1lTpN•CNAFFEY•OtlMklGk+ETAVANOA•MONTCLArq.QkTAAl0.UPLAND a VALLEY V&W Id ! HIGHLAND AVENUE i t NORTI I CITE' OF RANCHO CCCAIVTONGA TITLE: eM.� >=t r acc�h/1aP PLANNING DIVISION E.1..I IIBIT:__ sG1I_c: �- i RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVsL 'CF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO:. 86-03A - !AING HOMES, AMfNOING THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN FROM FLOOD CONTROL TO LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DU/AC) FOR 40 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EXTENSIONS OF BANYAN AND MILLIKEN F' WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all c`I�ents on tiie proposed General Plan Amendment No.86- 03A. SECTION 1 The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby makes the following Tin ings: c A. The Amendment does nut confiitt wit'i the Land.lisp Pol lm es nrf the mil Plan. R .. 13. -The Amendment promotesgoal _ _:of the l.aad Use Eleme 1 gDa �' 75 p C. The Amendment would not be mat-eri al iy injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. SECTION 2: The General Plan Land Use Map shall be amenued as follows: Assessor's Parcel Number 201-271-55, approximately 40 acres in size and located on the southwest corner of the extnesions of Banyan and Milliken shall be changed from Flood Control .to -Law-Medim Density Residential (4-8 du/ac). SECTION 3: A Negative Declaration is hereby recommended for adoption by a i y( 'Icil for this General Plan Amendment, based upon the _.completion and findings of the Initial Study. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT R °SOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission does hereby recommend approval of General Plan Amendment No. 86- 03As to the City Council. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUrAMONGA BY: ennls L. Stout, Chairman " ATTEST: _ Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary 4 PLANNING GOMMISSTO RE $OLpCTON NO. ,F GPA 86-03A �- CAUG"HGAS September 24, 1986 L page 2 I, Brad: Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, d"ereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly ankl regularly introduced, pea-sed, and adopted by tue Planning Commission of the ti City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting o: the'Planning Gomnfission held on ire 24th day of September, 1986, by the following vote--to-wit,: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: - NOES: COMMISSIONERS: 4 ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: x�y C F ,t II RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGk., CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 86-03A LANG HOMES, REQUESTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN FROM FLOOD CONTROL TO LOW- ME31UM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DUjAC) FOR 40 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EXTENSIONS OF BANYAN AND MILLIKEN WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has herd a duly advertised public: hearing to consider all comments on the proposed General Plan Amendment No. 86-03A. SECTION 1: ,11ie,Banrha rur-- —_4 mg Zm missimt cannot ►nak-a the ¢ imllnwing t A°. 'The-faiendment-•does -not-'Cm t-Wi'Lfi-" tar d Policies of the General Plan. B. The Amendment promotes goals of the Land Use Element. C. The Amendment would not be ratLrfally injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission does hereby recommend denial of General Plan Amendment No.86-03A. _ APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONLA i BY:ummils ut, Chairman - ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary s �.. PLANNING COMM=ISST RESOLUTION NO. GPA 8ii=03A - DENl, - LAING HOMES 24, 1986 Page 2 a 1, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of i Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed,'and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of September, 1986, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COK41SSIONERS k f ' - I a 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA G;ICA fq STAFF REPORT °s° ''°9 2 j h a f r 4 U` $ > DATE: September 24, 1986 Wi7 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission c FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Warren, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENPAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMEM iS'14T 86-03B request to amenT-VTT a se ement or the General Piap from Medir.n Density Residential (4-14 du/ac) to Neighborhood Commercial for 10.7 acres of land, located at the northwest corner of Haven and Highland - APN 201-262-28, 30, 31, 36, 37, 40, 41, 43, E•9VIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT EN-n6-UT- C - A request to amend the Development Distrzec p from (8-14 du/ac) to "NC" for 10.7 acres of lava, located aw the northwest corner = Haven and Highland APN 201-262-28, 30, 31, 36, 37, 4t:, 41, 43. I. ABSTRACT: A General Plan Amendment and Development District; 7mendrtent is requested to change the present Medium Residentia' designation (4-14 du/ac) to Neighborhood Commercial for a 10.7 acre property located at the northwest corner of Haven Avenue and Highland Avenue. The applications have been made by the Clurman Company in anticipation of the development: of 3 neighborhood shopping center on the site. At this meeting, the Planning Commission should make a determination on the proposed General Plan - and Development District changes. Staff recomiiends approval of the request in part. II. PROJECT AND 'SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: General Plan Amendment to change the subject properties rom Medium Residential to Neighborhood and a Development District Amendment to change the subject properties from Medium ("M") to Neighborhood Commercial ("NC"), B. Location: Northwest corner oil Haven and Highland Avenues. C. Parcel size: 10.7 at:res (gross). D. Existing Zaning: Medium ('^;") Residential. ITEM J 4 ... I PLANNING COMMISSsoN STAFF REPORT GPA 86-03B &ODA 86-03 CLURt'.W COMPANY September 24, 1986 Page 2 �( E. Existin(i Land Use: Single family homes with the majority of �1 tl`ie'praperty- vacant. n (l F. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning R—FrEt - 5ingle tamily con ominiums in the Medium ("M") District; vacant land (n the Neighborhood Commercial ("NO) District. ` South - Vacant in the Low ("L") District. East - Shopping center (under construction) in the Neighborhood Commercial ("NC") Cistrict. West - Single family development in the Low ("L") Diatrict. G. Generzl Plan Designations: 'Prof ec i to - e i um 4 du/ac). North - Medium (4-14 eq/ac) and Neighborhood Commercial. South - Proposed freewQ,,. East - Neighborhoods Commercial, West Law (2-4 du/ac). H. Site Characteristics; The subject site is predominantly vacant with wii —grams as the primary vegetation. Topography is generally flat and slopes slightly from north to south. III. ANALYSIS: In review of the application, staff has found three major aspects which are important to the consideration of the land use question. These issues are as follows: _ A. Re-alignment of Highland Avenue. As a result of future Route reeway eve opmen , ig and Avenue is to be re-aligned northeasterly through the site. This action will result in a major division of the site into three separate parcels of approximately 1.55, 1.76 and 3.90 acres (see Exhibit "B").- Appropriateness of the commercial or multi-family land use designations should take into account the resultant parcel size, shape and locations. Parcel ;, the 3.9 acre portion will be bordered on three sides by major roadways (Haven, Highland, and a freeway rh-ramp). Such an arrangemem does not lend itself to a optimum living environment in a res;dAntial development. Parcel 2, 1.76 acres, will back up to an existing single family tract to the went and the existing condominium project to the north, and has a 560 foot frontage on the future Highland Avenue. This site %4ill have a triangular shape and will be set back from Haven Avenue by approximately 300 feet. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF DEPORT GPA 86-03B 8 DDA 85-03 -CLVR Ali COMPANY September 24, 19% Page 3 Parcel 3, 1.65 acres, will front on Haven Avenue with a 200 foot depth, bordered on WZ south by a re--aligned Highland Avenue, single family .condomiriums to the west and a vacant commercial parcel to thy.`north, The applicant has submitted a concept site plan (see Exhibit "B") to show the possibilities of commercial development on all three parcels. The plan is only for information purposes and no indepth analysis for conformance with Development Standards has been made by s*aff. (It is noted that the Haven Avenue building setback i�& 'incorrectly indicated at 30 feet; 45 Feet is required). =,Anther, the applicant has stated that V driveway from the southerly parcel onto Haven is very import; to the success of the project, The City Traffic Section ht ; indicated that a driveway so close to the future freeway on- ramp is unacceptable Pram a traffic contr0q and safety standpoint, In review of the potential General Plan Amendment, the v'e;t,ility of the com ercial ase of each site should be consid-qred as a part of its location and relationship to adjacent land-,uses (existing or planned). B. The Need for Additional Commercial Land: At staff's request, die apparent as prepar an economic analysis of the land use k change to help deterMte if additional commercial land is warranted for that part of the community,. The conclusions from the stud, are attached wt-:h this report which indicate the foil owing. , "There is a substantial markt gap for retail development in the City of Rancho W camonga has a whole and in the primary trade area for ighland-Haven commercial project, ir) particular." - Staff generally concurs with the statement, Thrs statement, however, does not address the issue of vacant commercially zoned land already in the City and what would the market be for commercial projects if then were all to be developed. The economic analysis of the Foothill Boulevard Study indicates that the community has already a h,qh :allocation of commercially-zoned land for its future needs. The amount of commercial development has not yet caught up wit,;r the needs of the community but there is an adequate of commercially zoned land to meet those needs. AG :or the needs of the immediate area concerned, only the eleven acre (117,588 square foot of building space) shopping center on the east side of Haven is available to provide retail commercial service. The site in question could provide for any shortfall not provided for in the new shopping area. PLANNI. 'COMMISSIG STAFF REPORT ] GPA 86-038 & DDA 86-03 - CLURMAN COMPANY September 24, 1986 Page 4 Off• c �G 0 2. "Based upon these market gaps for retail prod..cts, the t; optima~"retail outlets for the Highland-Haven commercial project have-been identified based upar Its location and competitivones� fre the marketplace. A-�.Aitionally, these retail product;, can be absorbed in a reasonable time period of some two to three years." 3. ��i The potential of the Foothill Freeway lends itself to prompt^ng the viability of commercial development. ' Staff concurs with this assumption." Staff concurs that certair, features of the site do warrant serious consideration of at least a portion of the site for commercial use as evidenced in the economic study, C. Relationship "o General Plan Policies: Thr. General Plan proviaes For c,immercia an uses, one eing the Neighborhood : Commercial Designation. This land use type "include shopping^ centers and convenience c.mmercial clusters that' provide essential retail goods an*- services to the residents or occupants in the immediate vicinity." 1. Neighborhood Shopp.r,g Centers, these centers shall be provi e o euee a rei"!. and service needs of a cluster of neighborhoou._ with ;'-A total populaticn of roughly 10,000 residents. The-primary use within the neighborhood =popping centers- shall be a major supermarket and total leasable area ranging from 30,000 to 100,000 square feet. The following provisions shall guide the development of such center. a. Thee center shall be approximately 5 to 15 acres im size. b. No more than twa centers shall be, fir• °,,;red at each designated intersection. c. The cer�er shall perm;;. the following tenants: eating and drinking establishments,; food and beverage retail sales, general personal services, repair services for commonplace household appliances; and retail sales. Administrative and professional offices, medial services, and financial, insurance and teal estate services may be permitted. d. The center shall be located at street intersections of at least,collector size or at the intersection of two ma.;jr local streets." PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 86-03B b DDA 86-03 - CLURMAN. r^"'auy September 24, 1986 Page 5 It appears `that a Neighborhood Commercial Center can be developed to satisfy a majority of the provisions outlined above as evidenced by its location and potential commercial needs of the immediate area. Conclusions: The parcel adjacent to the freeway (Parcel 1) is a very difficult site to develop successfully for residential uses, and a commercial land use may be an appropriate alternative, provided the access question can be resolved through mitigation at project level. Staff, however, has the following concerns regarding the remaining portions of the site: 1. The re-alignment of Highland Avenue will cause fragmentation of the site preventing ttie development of a =.:r f ed shopping center. The 1.7 acre section (Parcel 2) abutts residential development on two sides. Its buildable portion fronts on a collector street (Highland) and is approximately 400 feet from Haven Avenue. These conditions raise land use questions as to the appropriateness of this parcel for commercial purposes. 2. The northerly most section (1.55 acre, Parcel 3) is separated from the main parcel frontri,y on Haven and therefore may not easily tie in with the majority of a commercial development, If however, the northerly portion was integrated in a develop.;ent with the vacant parcel further north, then a Larger, more viable, development could be possible. It may be appropriate to study the land use issue of this section of the site in conjunction with the land usq to the north. Staff has prepared three preliminary land use alternatives which include she properties to the north. A study of the posEibilities (ExhW is CI, C2, and C3) should be separate from this application and staff would therefore recommend that consideration be given to leaving the 1.55 acre portion under the existing Medium Density Designation with the provision that the site be studied with the northerly parcels in the next General Plan Amendment cycle. V. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSES,MENT: The Initial Study has been completed and staff hasthe nvironmental Checklist, Part II of the Initial Study and has found no signif,ant adverse environmental impacts to occur as a result of the proposed Amendment and District change. It is anticipated that the issue of vehicular access can be successfully mitigated at the project level. VI. FACTS FOR FIr1DINGS: Should the Commission upon exasmination of the General an en ent and Development District Amendment, decide that the change would promote the land use goals and purposes of the General Plan, and would not be detrimental to the adjacent properties or cause significant adverse imiacts a;. listed under the Environmental Assessment, the following �.:>>dings are necessary for approval J--ate PLANNING COMMISSIONA$STAFF REPORT GPA 86-03B & DDA 86-03 - CLURMAA COMPANY September 24, 1986 Page 6 A. The Amendments do not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Pl are; B. The Amendments do promote the goals of the Lane Use Element; acid C. The Amendments would be materially injurious or detrimental to adjacent properties. VII. CORRESPONDENCE; This item has b"e,'a advertised as a public hearing in The ' 1Y1Y Repqrt newspaper, the property posted, and notices sent to aTl- s prope-- r owners within 3D0 feet of the project site. Staff h" reviewed a letter of general opposition to the proposed change from The Garden Apartments 11omeso4mers Association (attached). In the letter, the association suggests that Office uses would be a preferred alternative to Neighborhood Commercial uses. VIII. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommendations are noted below: o Parcel 1: Approve Amendients from Medium Residential to acres) Neighborhood Commarcial. o Parcel 2: Retain existing Medium Residential designations 40 acres) o Parcel 3: Retain Existing Medium Residential designation at tiis acres) point, and provide staff with direction for possible consideration during the next General Plan cycle. If the Commisyion concurs with this recommendation, adoption of the attached Resolution recommending approval to the City Council of the General Plan Amendment and Development District Amendment and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Res tfully s itted, Br Bul er City Planner OK:A4l:ko Attachments: Exhibit "A' - Vicinity Land Use Map Exhibit "3" - Development Site Plan Exhibit "C" - General Plan Land Use Alternatives Resolution of Approval for Genera, ;elan Amendment Resolution of Approval for Development District Amendment E I THE GARDEN APARTMENTS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED 6300 KAVEN AVENUE September 18. 1986 ALTA LOMA,CA. 91701 Mr. Allen Warren RECEIVED-- Planning Division CITY OF RArJCHo CUCAMONGA City of Rancho Cucamonga PLANNING orvlsior; 9340 Baseline Road, Unit B SEP 181986 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 0 718iyiiUlllll:i;!1fLtHi1516 Dear Mr. Marren, Pursuant o the Environmental Assessment and General Pi/an p Amendment 86-03B Clurman and Environmental Assessment and Devel— opment District Amendment 86-03 Clurman, the Garden Condominiums Homcowners Association is very concerned about the proposed land use change from 'medium Density Residential (4-14du/ac) tr Neigh— borhood Commercial for 10.7 acres of land located at the north— west corner of Haven and Highland Avenues. At our annual Homeowner. Meeting held September 14, 1996, r much discussion ensued concerning the above proposed land r'se change. At this meeting, I was appointed spokesperson for '`,he " Homeowners Association. Some of the questions raised that the homeowners wish to have addressed are as follows: 1. What e°f-r.t will being surrounded on three sides by commer- cial development have on our resale property values? 2. Is "Neighborhood Commercial" the best use for the property in. view of .he fact that two nearby Neighborhood Commercial developments have already been approved? One is directly across the street which will open in December and one borders our complex to the north which has yet to be developed except for a service station on the corner of Lemon and Haven and a retail nursery that has since closed. 3. Aren't the two existing Neighborhood Commercial centers ade— quate to serve our shopping needs? Does not our General Plan statE, "The primary use within a neighborhood shopping center should be a major supermarket"? If no major tenant exists, wojld this commercial center be more like a "strip .center"? 4. Wouldn't a better vise of the land south of proposed Alta Loma Avenue and west of Haven Avenue be "Office—Professional" rather than commercial? 5. With the completion of the Foothill Freeway and Haven Avenue becoming a major traffic artery as well as the "Northern Gateway" to the city from the freeway, will such a small com— mercial center 5e rem„j scent of the strip centers and traf— fic congestion that can be found at 1-10 and Mountain Avenue in Upland? , ,�'t r THE GARDEN APARTMENTS HOMEOWN'BRS ASSOCiATION .INCORPORATED 6300 HAVEN AVENUE e ALTA LOtJA,CA. V,7B7 �..s_. September 18, 1986 If the Pl-anninq Commissi.an decides that a land use har4e has merit, we residents a€ththe Garden Condominiujms would like to see Office-Processional desianaii.on iwf at all possible rrather than commercial, and oniv on f_hhA-t7 rti_on of land south of Prope~sed dTta Loma Avenue. thus leaving awl portions of north of Alta Loma Avenue at -its present fi+ledium Density Residential)coning. We would also pointout a matter that is not at all clear on the drawings submitted by the developers. The Garden Condom- iniums Homeowners Association holds title to the ex:'sting driveway that exits onto Haven Avenue. The portion of proposed Alta Loma Avenue that meets Haven Avenue is the approximate location of our :- driveway. This is not just an easement -we own the property ° outright. Is the PlanningOmrlrl5Si9R aware that thess Alans apincorporate our property and that nano title chanae—has yet been proved hZ the homeowners? We homeowners recognize the need for a landowner"s capita) gain an the development of his property. As homeowners, we sup- ported this need by approving (with conditions concerning our driveway) the Highland and Haven Garden Condominiums (Medium Den-sity Residential) proposal in 1982 by 6evelopers Stan and Peter Allen. We pay tribute to the Allens for creating the environment which we now enjoy. Above all else, we wish to retain the char- a cter of that environment. I may be reached at home„ Telephone 987-8639, or at Chaffey College (where I am Associate Professor of Economics), Telephone 987-7737. Thank you for your consideration. Resp tfvation, yours, C1lyMRANct: i �. Craice, Vice President PLANNING= Garden Aents Homeowners Assoc Inc. AM S.EP18198b Chairman, Ad Hoc Committee to ' Study Development Plans '�1$l�llQiutj�p;L.l%clliitl r, i Flul FA SITE: G.P A. 86 03B _ R ,.. FL i �.' ccr . .. ate■ a +-�— z •e . ' l .; Zil E �'�...........�y�. Y, .- I ,p GENERAL PLAN MAP DESIGNATIONS r. 1 � TAT`-SITEt��86-03 r ..+ 1 , i LM� FC I. h 4 .LM c a i.Nd M i �^ � h ; - E i• o� cft�oaaaa m LIVELM o° FC t DEVELOPMENT MSTRICTS MAP ^ �C)lihl t CITY OF ITEM iZAINCHO C;CAI\,IONGA TITLE: 1V t I►t � � PLANNING DIVISION t it tutt't' /L1'�'!'i.l��'JS. LV{��t•EQ J1105. « LEMON AVE, 60 ter^ 2-4 aid /Rc: $TR, ,� 7R,g402� ORANGE' ,.'SY. ',, Y9C. � 3r" jCONIh1fi?CJAL 41WM.P COa+5r.�� /41.•f4 { MrEv' w THE GARDEN at'75. RES, a M.8.tt8/Gt,62 4-l� APTy. DEV 015T. VLiG� s,x - SOMERSEx Ltf3, 135 �� cu HIED„ S f'IEl7.�EE5.4�.4 /45.47}_ p p 17, a aU S PER AC. m c ACl/ivT tYa�iy�rtClAG • r W V.9GRNT YRC. CJEt/ O/s ,J' > ETA Eat``A J X bCY.D/ST,/VG ,�JJJ l H GKi.aN,7 _ AVE.f71?AMGE } O Amen QES. 6A'41/. 0 LON/, -s' mz, VAC. vEV. ors;: 'VACAA/7 DEYOIST. co INCH AV cn 11 M9.�d2/X gt}'gz to • t SITE PLAN 6ENQeAC PCA// &q•va t1SE lNof;,TI I CITY OF ITEX I.4�- P.A .0p RANCHO CUCrUMO EGA TITLE. PLANNING DIVISION E.1IIICII' �� `j SCrtt~ - _` o 9- ca O � + Lu J fi ¢ w •; 6f nW¢o �a? Loy 1'dgg < z I rY b LOU LU 2,4 C)/) to P es /Jf •` J • Ei- 1, J I' c�a r��••� � ii jl CL LWLj CITY Orr, 1rT11pIG11 � 6i D.4Q- •o3 fJ3 RAI CHG CLC UVIONGA TITLE:_SeM RA PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT:"$" SCALE ZAA10 a' . .'E.a<a�/Avewcis area■■■ae■■aaa■■■■■■Deer■,uas■ s■a�sa ��-�,�o� ,S`�'UOY a ■ s � t ■ ■ 1 a ■ ■ �,Cur.:.r s ■ s;- ea■■■a■■�■w�[ .;Mua■■ems■■■■ease a a �/�,.�.y0 USA . —.■ia t :� i CCLt��e/yI/iP.A7laNS P,ER ■ �: ST.Q�sr RE'co,.�.esrEiva�Tta. ■ e a a d 1� 5r 601, ■ a f-,( ad �✓dNfJ G.,SLS'�L7"�P,.t.CdTIY�,s i ( ■ �ttTveE,J ■ c' /Q,eE.d ■ ■ At ■ n ■ ■ ■ ■ �s ■ ie■■■■■■i■ese■■■■■a■anee■■■r■ m � ' rr ( ■ e SMA64 IaiQR2G6G dAIIIAlICAI I ®� � r f � QyiOit/y'Ci0.70 Cd�bWB,tfS.d6 suGT/-FA,t//C Y`iL/J '■ e A c?17 TNT .y'A✓QR/3'Y dam' exisex '■ Leo u r t ■ ammoss G'r?ei rrte�.CC.{`44 C✓acANTi NJ ■ ■ McSr�7/r//�!. /tw �b7Fra1>I.dE —••—._.. �*R� � _ D.t>/9'Y.L'8c.4 7 rc7Ns�veP OeF' Y.bt I �� •ra/`, s�d4RG6Gs � E�Y,V.rlE.�'17's �F��/ GJOUIOI�6OU1R�. 3?"l/�y'r . ANO .a AClf3ue ��%4oK°ltlty , f ".si FaJTUi.�'E �.cl6.G.dG I �i G'o,W,cf j 3.70 acre 1 //* _sue'•. .. —' . �' (Furuti►E�E�st4dY /Csgvr of�Y� . ,AAA V _ lt'.sla�r A_rc.r�rs a.rs■■r�■ae■rrri�rrr�re®■■siege■ r■uwati �tiTU.G''E St��r ■ Al ■ t ■ a o e ■ �v1 AG>E.C�il�dTOri'E Ldw/t� . ■ .. Ore 1 .■ y IJSE .Cc.vFitl'clt'.dTloHl/�✓ f ( ; �• .�,1H/C/r 7�I� .SrG.s1Gl .Ai�d�1O>~� ■ sL�✓cri-FA.r,I/cYl.L1� zv el � .+�'.lE.ore%u f'�+I,J.a.,vo-a-.4�� I exisL`dnf t■ r' to C•5�au+e ■ ■ Q8A4 .P.+d�C.'rC.f' Tts Tii�6 ■ �../•-� `-�„��,: � f�OT6.ClTs.•d L of.Q VIA,BGE Li�` f oBv,�co.P.cres�c!`r•A4 -nwr Af I /,7&acr+z �,�' �� i ✓oUco RAY e��d .szrroy DIY .aacJ© A f'&d4zIC•Y.��/.c I 0R j 0 -- (Fufu �'FREG°sVAY �iycr of�.IY, £ � INTRO (f DUCTION Bacxgrouirc The owners of the property located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Highland and Haven Avenues are p?arning a commercial ' I development for their property. Since the property's current land-use II designation is for high-density residential, according to Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan, the property owners are requesting a general plan change for their property to a commercial land= ise. Specificayly, the parcel of property originally consisted of a' total of 3Jme 10.5 acres. However, due to the H, proposed Foothill Freeway, a frontage road Will traverse the property, so its size has been reduced to some $ usable acres. The properties surrounding the subject parcel have a variety zf land-uses: There is a community shopping center to the east of the subject site that is being developed presentiv; however, its i t_ acreage was reduced by five acres due to foothill Freeway. To the west t and north of the site are existing high-density residential projects, L such as apartments and condominiums. Accordingly, there is also some neighborhood co;'aerciai to the north of the site. Finally, most of the other undeveloped p property in the general vicinity of the site has Lresidential land-use designations. The proposed project is hereafter referred to as the highland-Haven Commercial Project. LFor additional ii.formation on the location of the Highland-Haven Commercial Project and its surrounding land-uses, refer to Map A. r Credentials and Qualifications of Empire Economics �r To comply with the requirements of the Planning Department, the property owners are having an economic feasibility study of their Proposed commercial development conducted by Empire Economic, a firm specializing in performing such studies. Empire Economics has conducted market demand studies for residential, commercial and industrial projects located throughout Southern California and San Bernardino County, in ge.reral, as well as the city of Rancho CucamongA. in particular. Some of the -tudies that Empire Economics has conducted recently include Chino %ills; the Ontario International Airport, and the Tri-City Corporate Center. Addit;;,i illy, Empire Economics has also Conducted Market Demand Studies for Rancho Cucamonga's Mortgage Revenue Bono programs. Consequently, Empire Economics rill utilize its knowledge of t s economic conditions the Rancho Cucamonga area to assess the viability of' the prc.,)osed Highland-Haven Commercial project. 1' Components of the Market Demand Study The Market Demand Study cond, ted by Empire Economics l:tilizes a forecasting-simulation economic-comme.vial model to analyze the market � �. demand and supply conditions for the retati commercial r projects within the relevant market and trade areas. The model integrates basically L_ two kinds of information: general economic/financial concepts y underlying real estate development; and specific demographic and t_ economic factors affecting the designated Market areas. Specifically, the primary components of the forecasting-simulation economic commercial model are as fc _oars; L t Fare 2 r' I. The Existing and Expected Populati+)r. Grewth in the p _ Market and Trade Areas Demographic, Employment and Construction Activity: Recen* Trends and Patterns 1 Population Forecasts for the Market Region g Population and Household rorecasts for the Trade Areas II. The 'Potential Demand for Retail Products in the Trade Areas ! g' Gross Pur.ehasing Power in the Trade q.,^eas ' Potential PrIznhasing Power for Various Retail Products Potential Leasable Space and Retail 04--lets f, for the Var:oas Retail Products L f Ill. Market Supply Conditions for Commercial Retail Establishments Recent Retail Sales Activit- Comparabie Commercial Projects in the Prime Trade Area Competitiveaess and Capture Rates for the uighlard-Haven Commercial Project 6 I'll. The Optimal Product Types and their Absorption Estes i for the Highland-Haven Commercial. Project Potential ',arket Gaps for Retail. Outlets Optimal Pt.,duct Types for the Candidate Project ( Conclusions L Thus, thv market demand study systematic311y proceeds from the general ' demographic, economic and financial market conditions to the optimal l Product types for tie subject site *&nd their expect.d absorption L schedules. L i ( Major Assumptions and Qualsftcatior_s t_ L The ,!arket Absorption study was conducted within the context of i various assumptions and qualif'14ticns; accordingly, these are now presented_ Page 3 jI:i _ _ ..�•' I 9. Economic Conditions The population and retail forecasts are based upon the. most '- probatle intermediate ani long term enonomio and financial market conditions for the Highland-Haven Commercial Project. Accordingly, the projections represent the underlying ec»nomie-financial conditions over the typical business/real estate cycles, Such projections are appilapriate for projects such as commercial retail establishments, since they represent. ::eng-term commitments. 2. Production of the CAmmeroitl Products The property ownersidevelppers for the Highland-Haven Commercial iroject are e%pected. to produce the optimal commercial products for the candidate parcel with appropria;�'e eharacte,ristics and competitive rents so that the commercai products required to satisfy the demand proj"tions are ava�'-4b'.e in a tin>ely manner, The assuimption reflects the sponsiveness of the developt-va/builders to the expected -xec conditions. Thus, the conclusions of this study are subject to the above assumptions and qual �ications riai ket and Trade Areas t_ Bused upon a coi-iduratioa of the demographic and economic warket factors that will influence ha success of thn Proposed commercial projee,. `,ae following market and trade area: have been delineated: AM Market Areas The relevant marke., a_ are as follows: E J-_ Paa_e 4 Los Angeles Metropolitan Area: This encompasses the Southern California economy, ircltiding Los Angeles, Orange, -San Bernardino, R Riverside, San Diego, rind Ventura counties. While most Of the demographic, economic, and construction activity was originally concentrated i.r, Los Angeles County, there has been a substantial spillover of such activity to the other counties, such as San Bernardino County, during the past decade, San Bernardino County: Th;ie inc rude, all of the various cities and 1 communities within its boundaries. i i ll Regional Markets: San Bernardino County is partitioned into regions, according to their particular demographic and economic ehzracteristios, o.s follows: I West Region: Rancho Cucamonga,, Montclair, Chino, Upland and Ont2rio East Region: Fontana, Rialto, Colton, Lora Linda San Bernardino, Grand Terrace, Redlands, Highlands, and Yucaipa Desert Regiun: Hesperia, Victorville, Adelanto and Barstow For additional information on the boundaries oY the market areas, refer to Map B. I =rade Areas The trade areas represent the households that are expected to use the retail establishments at the commercial site. There are three trade areas to consider: prima-y, secondary and tertiary. The specific � boundaries oP these are based upca the amount of time required for households to tilavel fro. their residences to the subject site; Page 5 .a 4"¢ additionally, the, locations of competing, commercial centers are also taken into consideration.- .These trade areas are first defined ' t according to the distance factor alone; then e _. refinements are madqti �.`• later, based upon the locations of aompe.�ing retail centers. ..L ! ; 31 Primary Trade Area: This includes the hi . $eholds that .. are in the immediate vicinity of the subject site, and- aa r.►,ey will regard t'Ae retail outlets on the subj=ct parcel as their primaryshe in' PF B opportunity for the products that it offers. Geo&raphically, this f includes most of Census Tract #20 Secondary Trade Araa: This encomr;sses the households that ,ail=1 consider shop ping at the retail outlets located on the subject site, but they will also have Leveral other competitive sites to choose from as well. This area covers the entire city of Rancho Cucamonga. Tertiary Trade Area: This cover " all of the households that may come into contact with the retail outlets on the candidate parcel, and so they m'y shop there from time to' t'time. From a geographical Lperspective, „3, s area-covers the ait°y of Rancho Cucamonga as well as its envii ons. For information on the specifi^ boundaries of the various trade areas refer to Map C. i L i L L ,T Page 6 Note Po facilitate your review of the study, the tables, charts, � f exhibits, graphs and maps relevant to each section have been placed at the end of that section. Statistics used in the text have been rounded t off to make the study more readable. ,or precise information, refer to the appropriate tables. r i r u ' L l_ L Page 7 1 • • , r, t rrt t + .��p t`1'i'I't'Itl;i,.11,{ +••..... c � t'lI1 , II111IIII, � 'C �I'Ifllllilllllllll lilt Iy„ Q a.+il�l�llt{llltlllll+llllllll :r •� 'c 1 lta ... (Si.' I'll(Ill;llllllllll111t{ �^ Jill, ftA.; { Illillllllllllllfllll I I 1 t L V J f l l l i l l 1 1{,%,I�I�i�l�l�ljl�l�l�tllll�I11lII�1'( +y t;lllttltl( I 1 1 f I 1 11I11 Illl+l�+�'. III,I.1�111�11111111 ltl�l I f'lll F . i IM + � II�. . ::. I 1 llll(1'lil�l�l�l�l�l Lm 1 gill II1 I i'I I {•• }�r'i. I I.1 It O ..a. ..�. •� � L 1 1•+I tj'. lBig '1 L e o::: • -f• :� L =-�- � -;.' ° ,; SECTION IV THE OPTIMAL PRODUCT TYPES FOR THE HIGHLAND-FiAVF:'i COMMERCIAL PROJECT AND THEIR ABSORPTION RATES The study now combines the res ults of the above analysis of the 4 Potential and the Factual retail sales for the various trade areas along with the competititeness of the Highland-Haven COMercial Project to determine the optimal product types for the site as well as their expected absorption sobedule. I Potential Market Gaps for Retail Outlets A comparison of the potential retail sales and the actual retail ail sales results in a determination of the market gaps for commercial retail outlets in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, This provides an 1- overview as to what types of retail outlets are presently most needed I in the city: h 1y85 Ratio: Potential Actual Actual/ Sales Sales Potential L --- millirns `__--_--_-^- APParel.°............... $18.71 $6..72 35.94% General Merchandise..... $5;',02 $10.84 L Drug Stores............. $9.99 i9.01% Food Stores.......a..o,. $3.93 45.93% Liquor Storea.........#0 $$4 64 $$3.57 16-99% Eating and Drinking..... $4.64 $3.57 76.99% L Home Furnishings., . $40°35 528.34 70.24% g...v.,..a, $18.90 $2,53 13,38% Building Materials.,..,. $ 7.66 $16. Automotive.....a....,.., $93.69 $24.80 6.47% $43.59 32.4 SPcciality ,,....°./,,,°• $'4.36 7% 0t11er .,,.a.,�.,aaaaaa,, $178.42 $97.00 54.37% $5R 3.08 $253,21 48 41% e� So, for the city as a whole, the actual level of retail sales amounts to some 4900 of its potential level. Consequently, most Of the retain products in Rancho Cucamonga have substantial market,gaps, based upon a comparison of their potential versus their actual retail sales. I. V. market gaps that exist presently could increase substantially during the next five years, due to the city's expected population growth. For instance, a comparison of the potential retail sales for 1990 as compared to the actual level of retail sales for 1985 reveals [ the following: 1 Ratio: 990 Potential Actual Actual/ Sales Sales Potential + --------- millions --_ Apparel......., ......... 85s21 $6.72 24.055 General Merchandise..... $10. 12.72% Drug Stores...*.*.*..... $14.52 $3.68 24.64 Food Stores............. $44.98 $43.93 97.65% Liquor Stores........... $6.93 $3.57 51.52% Eating and Drinking...., $60.25 $28.34 47.00% Home Furnishings........ $28.24 $2.53 8.96% Building Materials...... $41.34 $16.73 40.47% Automotive,,,,,,,,,,,,,, $140.00 $24.80 1%71% Speciality,,,,,,,,,,,,,, $6514 $14.36, 22 04% Other................... $266:61 $97.00 36.38% dOtal.e.,...ao...r... .... $781.63 $253.21 32.40% So, for Rancho Cucamonga as a whole, the actual level or retail sales would amount to Inly 32% of its potential sales, if there were no Lretail establishments built during the next fi.vc years. Thus, the retail products in Rancho Cucamonga have even greater market gaps, based upon a comparison of their potential 1990 sales to their actual Lretail sales for 1985. Consequently, the amount of new commercial development durdag the next two years must be sufficient to azoomplish Ltwo objectives: First, to fill the market gaps that existe4 as of 1985. LSecondly, to meet the additional demand for retaij produha by the Paze ?7 tF papulatian growth during the 1985-90 time period. For additional information on the retail market raps, refer to Table 20 and Graph 20. OptimaY Product Types for the FIighland-Haven Commercial Project The optimal product types for Hiehland-flaven Commercial Project can now be identified. Speeifically, .his is accomplished using the following algorithtr.. First, the retail product ty pes for which there Is presently a market gap are identified. Second, for each of these, ( the com'Petitiveness of HighlanA:Haven Commercial Project is considered. So, 3 retail nutlet is considered to he optimal if it fulfills both of these Grit,%:,ia. s City Competitive Optimal Need Site Products -------- -------- --------- Minimum Criteria.. 75.00 t ApAarel......r....*...... General Merchandise..... Yes do No Yes N,)1 Dr';g StoYes...r.........• Yes NJ o N Food Storenot........... N o NO Yei$ No Liquor Stores..........r NO Yes NO Eating and Drinking..... _ Yes Yes Yes- Home Furnishings....,..., Yes Yes Yes Hui3ding Materials....,. Yes Yes yes '4!1tQmOt].Veo..►.r.......a. Yes Yes Yes Speciality.............. Yes Yes Yes Cther.., ................ Yes Yes Yes L Therefore, the subject site is suitable for the product types -that, are {_ designa e,d "Yes's For additional information on the specific retail outlets for each of the above categories, refer to Chart A. a Page 28 Absorption TIM for the Optimal Rstaii Outlot@ The abso,^ption of the o�TPtimak pro,tuct types for the Hi hland-Hav g en CommVcial Project i.: expected to occur in a timely manner , since the i selection of these product types fulfilled two key designation: First, xp there are substantial market gaps for these product types the city of Rancho Cuc amonga. Secondly, the Highland- Haven a Highland Haven Commercial Project has a site .nich is competitive with other comparable sites. Thus, it ry` is reasonable that the optimal Products could be absorbed during the 1 next two-three years. Conclusions Therefore, Empire Economics;, based upon a comprehensive analysis of the market demand and supply con3itions for commercial retail outlets in the city of Rancho tacamonga, along with the locational and other attributes of the candidate parcel, has concluded that the t Highland-Haven Commercial Project is appropriate for commercial development. The primary factors underl rj.Et, this conclusion are as hollows: There is presently a substantial market gap for retail development in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, as a whole, and in the Primary Trade Area for Highland-Haven Commercial Project, in particular. This market gap is expected to i'nnrease substantially, especially in the Primary Trade Area, as its population grows at a rapid rate during the 1985-90 time period. Thus, commercial development in the city of Rancho Cucamonga must y � grow at a very fast rate to Lapproach orattain an equilibrium condition by 1990. Page 29 Based upon these market gaps for retail prodgat s, Vii optimal !' retail outlets fcr Highland-Haven Commercial project have been ( identified, tased upon its location and competitivenss in th. j market place. Additionally, thus,; ,�et,a.i_ products can be absorbed within a reasonable tine period'',of' same two-three years. # The proposed Foothill Fraeway - U have segeral significant impacts upon Highland-Haven Commercial Projects First, the project will be adjacent to the freeway, and there will be aka F off-rams at Haven Avenue,' whicch is, of course, next to the site, t Secondly, a community, shopping center that is directly aorciss Haven Avenue has had its acreage reduced substantially, due to the (t route of the Foothill, Freeway. Consequently,- the demand fo* ` commercial establishments that woul3 have been developed u p n that property will shift to the subject site, due to its`*oroximi.ty. # Final , as a result of the proposed route for the FrothIll rreeway, the subject property has been split into two .sections and a major thoroughfare now traverses the parcel. Consequently, from a public safety perspective, it appears that 4 commercial development would be more ,appropriate than a residential project, due to the expected traffic conditions. t- ; JQsenhT.-Janczyk-Evans,- -- Ph.D. `29 Page 30 t . 1 i J oNfsO—TNYW .r - 3 i ! rr+.srrY+".rJ.w..."w....r..rr►r.+...�rr►..r....oM ------------------------------------------ I hie"�a ar RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THC, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING AOROVAL OF ' GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO, 86-038, AMENDING THE LAND 144SE ELEMENT OF 7HE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN FROM MECUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (4-14 DU/AC) TO ' NEIGHBORHOOB COMMERCT`1. FOR I11,7 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE NORTHWESi CORNER OF HIGHLAND AVENUE AND VAVEN Ali VUE - Apt' 4:01-262-28 30, 31, 36, 37, 40, ill, 43 t- WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider 111 comments on the proposed. General Plan Amendment Nc.86- 03B. y SECTION 1: r'he Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby makes the following in ings: A. The Kmendmant does not conflict with i..he Lard Use Policies cf the General. Plan. B. The Amendment promotes goals of the Lard Uso Element. ki C. The Amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adja;ent properties, follows: SECTION 2: The reneraI Plan Land else Map,,' shall be amended as i The portions of Assessor's Parcel Numbers 201-262-30, 31, 40, 43 south of the future re-alignment of Highland Avenue and north of the future freeway right-of-way, approximatel,v 4 acres in size shall be changed from Medium Density Residential (4-14 du/ac) to Neighborhood Commercial ("NC"). SECTION 3: A Negative Declaration is hereby recommended for adoption hY t e y Council for this General Plan Amendment, based upi)n the completion and findings of the Initial Study. E BE IT RESOLVE CommissionN does hereby Rrecommend approval�of General Pi ntlt,-at theh Amendm nt No. 86-03B to the City Council. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMOER, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMC", BY: ennis out, airman CCf�1DtIfiON,,,[YES6�.UTION NO. ;, GPA 85-038 -G1�Rti September 24, ' 986' Page 2 - r AFA ATTEST: `- rail-u`1Ter, eputy ecretary ` I, Bran Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Pl&nning Cosmir'sion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,,. passed, and adapted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Pl&nning Commission held €, on the 24th day of Seatember, 1989, by the fhllowing vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS.- NOES: C0144ISSIONERS: ABSENT: C(MISSIONERS: i k a r F r ci i 7 0,,',, 9to RESOLUTION NO. 11 f A, RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMIS V OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,, :RECOMOENDING DENIAL GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 86-03B, THE CLURMAN COMPANY REQUESTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE 1` RANCHO CUCAMONGA, GENERAL PLAN FROM; MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, (4-14 WAO TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL.FOR, 10.7 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED- AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HIGHLAND AVENUE ,MD HAVEN AVENUE - APN 201-262-28,, 30, 31, 36, 37, 40, �tl, 43 WHEREAS, the Planning,.Commission has held a duly,advertised public hearing` to consider all coawnents,^_: the proposed General Plan Amendment No. 86-03B. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission cannot make the following 7n incT gs; A. The Amendment dcas not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan, B. The Amendment promotes goals of the Land Use Element. C. The Amendment would not be x',;�eriaily injuricus or detrimental to the adjacentw.prcazeaties. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVE` ,that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission does hereby recommedd denial c- gene+°0 Plan-Amendment No.86-036, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH Gsi# OF SEPTEMBER, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO"CUt;AMONGA BY: ennis ou , airman — - ATTESTS ra u er, Deputy acretary u � PLANNFN,G CdWI5SION NEST !f�IQN 140. GPA SG=036 -. C1NIAL $ GLk4R+�tAN September 24 1986 .:, Page 2 I, 13rad Buller, `Gg�puty Sect etary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby, certify that the foregaing REsolution was duly ano regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at,°a1;2gular meeting of the Planning Commission beld on the 24th day, of S-ptenber iAG, 'by the"following,vote ti-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: CIIMMISSIO'sERS: ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ' , r dl RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE liiNGHD CUCAMDNGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CHANGE NO. 86-03 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE DISTRICT DESIGNATION FROM MEDIUM 1�) TO NE18HBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (NO FOR 10.7 �. ACRES OF,.;.AND,L9CATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HIGHLAND AVENUE AND HIVEN,AVENUE - 'APN 201-262-28, 30, 31, 36, 37, 40, 41, 43 411 WHEREAS, on the 17th day of duly, 1986 an application was filed and accepted on the above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 24th day,,F September, 1986, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission cannot make the foITowing in ings: 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses G permitted in the proposed district in terms .of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and 2. That the proposed district ci.ange would not have significant impact on thee; tvironment nor the surrounding properties; and - 3. That the proposed district change is in conformance ,. with the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby recommen s enia o Development District Amendment 86-03. APPROVED AND ADOPTED-THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBLER, 1986. ` PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r BY,Dennis L. 31047t, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy ecretary -- ASk IT-S3 , w., 'LANN1N0 CMSMftSION RESOW'J ION NO, x OQA 86-03 - O.ENIAL= CLUtRAM ;September 24, 1986 Page 2 Brad-Bul 1'er,'Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify.that the foregoing Resolution was duly and ; , regularly introduced, passed,.,and adopted by the Planning Commissian of the i� City of Rancho Cucamonga, at ,.Vregul ar meeting. of`the Planning Commission held on the 24th day, of September, 1986, by the following vote-to-wlt: AYES- COMOISSIONERS: NOES: COPAISSIONERS: C. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERF, Aft i r s J 5 �' �f RESOLUTION NO, A RESOLUTION. OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION d RECOhi,WENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CHANGE NO. V,. 86-04t. R£QUESTIIiG'A CHANGE IN TXE DISTRICT-DESIGNATI6M FROM MEDIUM (M) TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (NC) FOR 10.7 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OFHIGHLAND AVENUE AND HAVEN AVENUE APN 201-262-28, 30, 31, 36 37, 40, 41, 43 �• F, WHEREAS, or, the 17th day of July, 1986 an application was filed accepted on the above-described project; and PP led and WHEREAS, on the 24th day.of September, 1986, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing, pgrsuanz"'to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has :made the following i�"nn ngs: 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the pro,-:osed district i'n terms of access , size a d n com atibiit with ex isting xist`n 1`an Y � d use in the surrounia ng area; and 9 2. That the proposed district change v;a;P,,d not, have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and 3. That the proposed district change is in conformance ' with the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Development District Map shall be amended as foliows: ie nor ions of ,Assessor's Parcel Numbers 201-262-30, 31, 40, 43 South of the future realignment of Highland Avenueand north of the existing alignment of Highland Avenue, approximately 6.2 acres in size shall be changed from Medium M ( ) District to Neighborhood Co mmercial 9 (NC) District. SECTION 2 The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this projee wi not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on September 24, 1986. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Sec_ion 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby" j recommends appro`Val on the 24th day of September, 1986, District Change No. 86-U3. i :35 PLANNING COMMISSION'-RESOLUTION 90, DDA 86»03 - CLORMAf4 September 24 1986 ' rr Page 2- r ltr 2. The Planning'Con ni ssi.on hereby recommends that trie City Council appr,c-te and adopt District: Change U6. 86-03t �` 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall op. forwarded to the City Council, APPROVED AND'ADOPTED THIS"24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1986 , PLANNING COK41SSICx OF THE'CYTY OF RANCHO-CM AMQNGA BY: ennis L. Stout, s tairman ATTEST: BrIa Duller, D epu y Secretary , Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City or Rancho Cucamonga; do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution�Ias duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the Gt{ City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regulrir meeting of the.Plan�inq Commission held on the 24th .day of September, 1986, by the following vote-to-wit. AYES: COMMISSIONERS; NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ASSENT: COKMISSIONERS:'',. >1 d S w 060 CITY OF F.ANCHO CUCAINIONGA /r GL G11t1d STAFF REPORT G p Z DATE: Sq,;tember 24, 1986 1977 t TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Warren, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRCHMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86-03C - F - request to amen e t Lan se ement o t e eneral Plan from Medium-High Residential (14-24 du/ac) to Office for .75 acres of land- located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard 1,125 feat west of Hellman Avenue (9113 Foothill Boulevard) A9N 208-241-09 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT A14 N 14111 1T - C T F N 0 CUCAMONGA - Are uest to amen a eve opment Tstr�ct apro`m-"F4!" (Medium-High Residential, 14-24 du/ac) to "OP" (Office/Professional) for 75 acres of land looted on the south side of roothiii -Boulevard, 19125 feet west of Hellman Avenue (9113 Foothill Boulevard) APN 208-201-09. I. ABSTRACT: This General Plan Amendment was initiated by the City Council,�it is a change from Medium-High Residential to Office for a 75 acre site located on the south side of 'Foothill, west of Hellman. In conjunction-with the General Plan Amendment, a Development District. Amendment is included to change the site from Medium-High Residential District (MH) to Office Professional' (OP) District. At this meeting, the Planning Commission should make a - determination on the proposed General Planand Development District changes, I1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Change General Plan Land Use Map for the su jec s- a rom Medium-High Residential to Office; change the Development District Map for the subject site from Medium-High Residential to Office Professional. i B. Location: 9113 Foothill Boulevard, south side of Foothill ou evar(T. approximately 1,125 feet West of Hellman Avenue (APN 208-241-09). C. Parcel Size: .75 acres. ITEM K PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 86-03C, & DDA 86-04 September 24, 1986 Page 2 AML D. Existing ZoniM Medium-High Residential ,(14-24 du/ac) E. Existing Land Use: Vacant, with existing residential structure previously used as a child care facility. ' F. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: NO-Fill ommun7ty opping enter in the 'General Commercial (GC) District. South - Apartment developments in the Medium-High (14-24 du/ac) Residential District. East - Apartment developments, in the: Medium-High (14-24 ` du/ac) Residential District. West - Apartment development in the Medium-High (14-24 'du/ac) Residential District: G. General Phan Designations: Project Site - Medium-High Residential (14-24 du/ac) North ' Commercial South Medium-Nigh Residential (14-24 du/ac) East - Medfum=High Residentiai (14-24 du/ac) West - 'Medium-Nigh Residential (14-24 du/ac) H. Site Characteristics: Generally flat, with existing driveway andpaziking One residential wood frame structure on site. r. Existing mature walnut trees are 'located in driveway median. III. ANALYSIS: A. Background: In July of 1986 the City Council requested review of--this site for consideration to change the land use from its current Medium-High designation. This site is an out parcel surrounded on three sides by relatively new apartment projects. The original decision to designate the site for multi-family use was approprr*rte in hopes that it would be incorporated into future dev'e nnments.,Since that time, Medium-High density projects have-been developed _around the site, with no provisions for future incorporation of this site into, the developments. The site is presently unused with an existing residential structure which was ` previously used as a day care facility, i B. Reasons for the Proposed Change: Since the vacation of the child care Jacillty7, i y staff has received inquiries regarding consideration of potential land use alternatives for the site. With the specialized needs and market of child care centers, the owners of the property have stated' AubL it is unlikely that another child care operation is to be anticipated for location at the site. At three-quarters of PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 86-03C .& DDA 86-04 September 24, 1986 Page 3 d an acre, only 10 to. 18 units would theoretically be authorized for the site for residential purposes, This level of development would be difficult to attain given the , �. 55 foot front yard setback, parking and open space requirements, and the relatively small scale of,.the site. The limited parcel depth does not present much-flexibi,;:y to design dwellings which can be protected from the high traffic activity levels along Foothill Boulevard. The only viable residential alternative for this site would be as an addition to one of the neighboring apartment complexes. However, the `different ownership patterns and the lack of vehicular connections between the sites makes this unlikely. = The next logical land use designation for'the site would be for office purposes. Use of office projects as a buffer between apartments and retail commercial uses is an acceptable land use arrangement. Therefore a small of; complex may be a 'viable alternative compatible with ', neighboring apartment complexes. In .addition, ',he off•,-6 use would form a logical extension for the Commercial/Office development along Foothill Boulevard. C. General Plan;Land Use Goals and 'Policies: The Land Use 'Element of the i y s enera an ,'n ica es the following in rzlation to Office Districts: "The intent of this -'fand_use category is to prevent the proliferation of individual isolated offices. Commercial uses permitted within the Office category include administrative and professional offices;, business support services, financial, insurance, and real estate services; supportive commercial uses such as a restaurant and medical services." The subject site should not be considered as an isolated location for offices. It is cross the street from existing shopping centers attd there is a small Office/Cor:nercial development 1,4 few hundred feet to the west. Land use objectives which this proposal would help to satisfy are as follows: "Encourage 'opportunities to mix different, but compatibl,r_, land uses and activities," PLANNING CONLMISSIONm STAFF'REPORT r _GPA 86-03C & ODA 86-04 September 24, 1986: „ Pk-q 4 ,I "Organize land es to avoid creating n� sant !s. among",adjacent tend uses," Please note that the Interim Policies, which currently govarn development on this site, discourage General Plan>., Amendments prior to completion of the foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Study. The reason for this was to allow examination of,land use alternatives as part of the Foothill Study. However, this particular site is surrounded c-, all sides by relatively recent development. As a result, no nearby land uses„ire dependent-an the ;site, and a decision on this Amendment will have virtually no impact on other land use decisions made as part of the Foothill Study. Iv. EN+IIRO"1MENTAL ANALYSIS: The Initial Study has been completed and staff as reviews the Environmental Checklist, Part II, pf the Initial Study and has found no significant adverise environmental impacts to occur as ' a result of the proposed amendment and district change. V. ISSUES• In review of the foregoing analysis, the primary issues of e`considered by the Planning Commission are as follow- 1, Should' a lard use decision be made at this time withtut the benefit of the recommendations of the Specific Pian Study? Staff believes an appropriate decision can be made for this small out parcel. r' 2. Is the proposed office use compatible with surrounding existing developments? Staff believes such a land use arrangement, office and Multiple Family, is compatible. 3. Is the existing residential` land use or other alternatives more appropriate for this site than an office use? Staff believes the Office alternative, given the existing land subdivision and existing developments, is the most appropriate. YI. FACTS FOR FINDINGS; Should the Commission, upon examination of e enera an endment and Development District Amendment, decide that the change would promote the land use goal's and purposes of the General Plan, and would not be detrimental to the adjacent properties or cause significant adverse impacts as listed under the Environmental Assessment, the Following findings are necessary for approval: 1...r / a PLANNING COMMISSIOtt STAFF REPORT GPA 86-03C & ODA 86-04 September 24, 1986 Page A. The Amendment does not. confTict with tht Land Use Polities of the General Plan; s B. The Amendment dnes ;promote the goals of the Land Use " Element; and C. The Amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. VII. CORRESPONDENCE: Thzc €�"fem has been advertised as a Public eN-aring in a Daily Report newspaper, the property posted, and pro notices send-to all perty owners within 300 feet of the project site. j. VIII. RECtrMENDATION• It is recommended that the Planning Commission reviewa and consider all materials and public input on this item. If the Commission finds an Amendment to the General Plan warranted, staff recommends approval and adoption of the attached Resolutions recommending :approval to the City Council of the General Plan Amendment and Developmene District Amendment and the issuance of a Negative Declaration. Res ectfu11 sub�ted, t Bra' But:e City Planner BB;AW:ns Attachments: Exhibit "A" - General Plan and Development District Map Exhibit "B" - Area Map lidtial Study,Part II ` Resolution of Approval for General Plan Amendment Resolution of Approval for Development District Amendment ti _ ii' vido "A' .' ' -�'••\ .ge4l'j '°,�4^"�$� �- ` `� }�� i( � � Y•u f+ a ` }� �� _ ......♦.s...�. 4 ..area Golf {�Bp�{ w ! ra; rf • �F • +�• �:T 1M «.r 4+a*ram f �� C, rri i { A•- rs 'j'�' .L ey j t• f f{ia+ ,w•s�.. •• f.♦ a. • mar �`} � r� • �ri *.� f i ��• . E yr;• �w 1r ! � ,' fors }� aR�r • i .l.A r •,.x .• 6 a...�rw i r;R ! r 1 r. :•� �; „R.i. .; SITE. G.P.A. 86-(} .,... 1 k". O�0 f f iRrR! •RrZls �t •a•V ?fs' t f r. 3 ��i rRd�R;;tF:�Y w • ..• R.rr1 4r RrRR1i ri �,f. ♦a •}� L-:r a��mi��l�rj�+_M f,.t..�%1�%f%��i�.?%��/F s �+�it��E��'.�Y 11� �^'�5 w. .s .R�Y 4NERAL PLAN MAP DESIGNATIONS �! ��^— Oyu a•o� 11_ .. (_..t.r +�L] OP AS iI ` 1"ULL OF �R w Cn } t � SITE LM D.D.A. 86 •.w .. DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP NOItTl i CITY Or. ITe�t,G� ►A• Kc c, p � RANCHO CGC�'C\'QNGA WOOSTITLE-4—A -1 AL A} �rEVE-094a 3�'WOOS ` PLANNING DI '1SIQI GtIi�rIT=_:_ - SCt�LE._t1 f 3nN3AV NVVIIISH T a G. w 0 2 b7 K j 70- Q M a p o, 4 t� w o „�Qy Oft LU v LU cr.- 13a1al.S NQI7 ' � =y � ! • •, U �t7y ,y00 F o N b%i o IL jS I ol u '• � cc tu 03 cc ul 4 ,,,,pp o U �i 3fINHPtf aa;XiMIA- CITY or '- __._..- ITEM•62A.86-03C. D.P.A. K 04 ,- RANCHO CUC NICJNGA TITLE Use tile-Ilimcmp _ PLANNING DIVISION EtiIiIIil—_� SCALD. t a hRESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANKING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF f RANCHO CUCAMONGA, Cqq�IFORNIA, RECCi�a�fENDINa APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENY NO. 86-01C, AMENDIdG THE LAND USE t ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN WHEREAS; the Planning Commission has held a daisy advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed General°Plan Amendment N0.86' 03C. SECTION It The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby makes the following Tif ngs: A. The Amendment.does not conflict with..the Land Use Policie$ of the General Plan. R B. The Amendment promotes goals of tts-'Land Use Element. C. The Amendment would not be, materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. follows: SECTION 2: The General Plan Land Use Map shall be amended as Assessor's Parer Number 208-241-09, approximately .75 acres in size and located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, approximately 1,125 -feet west of Hellman Avenue shall be changed from Medtum=High Density Residential (14-24 dulac) to Office. SECTION 3: A Negative Declaration is "hereby recommended for adoption by e i y Council for this General Plan Amendment, based upon the completion and findings of the Initial Study. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission does hereby recommend approval of General. Plan Amendment No. 86-MC to the City Council. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy ecru airy •> ° Resolution No. < GPA 86-03C September 24 =986 Page 2 y., I, Brio Buller, C;; uty Secretary of the Planning Commission rf the Cit of � Y Rancho Cucamonga,'do ereby certify, that the foregoing:Resolut{vn was duly and = regularly introduced,;;passed, and adopted by.the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held op the 24th day of September, 2986, by the folloying vote-to-wit: } AYES: COMMISSIONERS:, NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: = t - RESOLUTION K0. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMErIDI'1G APPROVAL OF DISTRICT CHANGE NO. 86-04 REQUESIING A CHANGE IN, ,THE DISTRICT DESIGNATION FROM MEDIUM-HIGH (MH) TO OFFICE/PROFESSIONAL (OP) FOR .75 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ,ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL . BOULEVARD, 1,125 FEET WE5l OF HELLMAN AVENUE WHEREAS, on the 15th day of July, 1986, an application was. filed and accepted on the abova-described project; and 'N , 'WHEREAS, on the 24th day of September, 1986, the Planning Commission ¢ held a duly advertised pi14!ie nearing y,,�rsuant to Section 65854' of the California Government-Code, SECTION 1 The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility wit'. existing land use in the surrounding area; and 2. That the proposed district change would not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properti'es;j,ai�d 3. Than the proposed district 1. hange is in conformance t: Ie General Plan. SECT10i . ,e Development D,'str ct Map shall be amended as follows: Assessor's Parcel -Number 208-241-09, approximately .75 acres in size &..id located cn %the south side of Foothill Boulevard, approximately 1,125 feet west of Hellman i Avenue, shall be changed from Medium-High i~ensity Residential (1424 du/ac) to Office. SECTION 3: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this project wi not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and re,.,mmends issuance of a Negative Declaration on September 24, 1986. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursupnt to Section 65850 t;) 66855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby j recommends approval on the 24th day of Septem er', Aw 1986, District Change No. 86-04, � f R.esoiutfon No. DDA 86-04 September 24, 1385 Page 2 r 1 2. The Planning Commission hereby recionnends that the 1 City council-. approve and adopt District Change No. 86-04. That a Certified Copy yf this R---olutton, anti .re'fated naterial hereby adopted by th6-41anning CcMhris'sion shall by forwarded to t, E City Cou3dil. APPROVED A►ii} AINIPTEO T�!S 24TN;SAY OE SEPTEMBER. t986.: PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY Os RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: 7 � JDennis u , tairman f ATTEST: AAk Braa Odlier,-Ue,—ou-t�-y-.,re—cFe—tAry.-- Ill, Brad Sulker, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby Certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of tae Planning Commission held on the 24th day of September, I9861, by the following'vote-to-wit: �J AYES: COKMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERSx ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �ACANI x STAFF REPORT 11 rr ' {( 23 DATE: September 24, 1986 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission- FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Rubin Yu, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASS'llESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86-�03D ' � R L 4Q - A request to amen t e Lan se smett' o�t,e enera Plan from Low. Medium Density Residential '.?4»8 du Jac) to Low Density Residential (2-4 dv�ac) •fog- `66 acres of land located at the southwast corner ,s !1i1son (if extended) and Milliken of extended) APB%- 901-191-11, 17. EhVIR0HK)fiAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMEND r - A 0 --A-request to amend 61le eve oilmen District ap rom °fC" (Flood Control) and %M (Low Medium Density Residential 4-8 Wac) to "L" (Low Density Residential - 2-4 d3/ac) for 66 acres of land located at the southwest corner of Wilson ;if extended) and Milliken (if extended) - APN 201-191-11 17 I. ABSTRACT: P,ecFntly, the CITY Council directed the staff to initia-a General Plan Amendment for the area, east of Chaffey College bounded by Nilson, Banyan and Deer Creek Channel. The request is for a change from LM (4-8 dU/ac) to L (2-4 du/ac), In conjunction with this Amendment, staff has initiated a Development District Amendment from LM and FC to L to assure Consistency between the General Plan and Development District Maps (see Exhibit II. BACKGROUND: In 1982, the Planning Commission approved a eves " ,op rit proposal (TT 1155D) for 508 condominiums and 8 single family dwellings for majority if the site. In 1984, the Planning Commission approved an extension for the tract map for two years. In June of this year, the project proponent requested an extension again, but it was denied by the Planning Commission. The project expired in July of this year. The easternmost 140 feet of the area, bounded by the college, Wilson, Banyan and the Channel (see Exhibit "B"), is currently designated FC on the Development District Map, LM of the General Plan, and belongs to the Flood Control District. In order to avoid fragmentation of future land use, this 140 foot ;vide strip is ITEM L a piAN�QING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT , GPA 86,-03D - CITY OF'RAtdCNa.CUCAMONGA September 24, 1986 Page 2 included in this Amendment. If approved, this Amendment would { result in the entire area being designated L u^der both the General P;an and the Development Code. The Flood Control District is not opposed to the change, III.'PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Change. 1) The General Plan Land Use Map r from Law a zum ensity Residential (4-8 du/ac) to Low Density Residential (2-4 du/ac) -and 2) The Development District Map from Low Medium Residential(4-8 du/ac)/Flood Control to Low Residential (24 du/ac). B. Location: South side of Wilson Avenue (if extended) and west `5TRTIMen Avenue (if extended). C. Parcel Size: 66 acres of land. D. Existing Land Use. Vacant, undeveloped. Z. Surrounding Land Use'and Zoning. North xts ing sing a ams y residential (Deer Creek),` designated Very Low Residential (less than 2 du/ac); vacant, designated Very Low Residential (less than 2 du/ac)., South - Vacant, designated Lora-Medium Residential (4-8 du/ac) East - Vacant. designated Flood Control. West Chaffey College, designatelLow-Medium Residential (4-8 du)lac), G. General Plan Designations. lProjectzte - ow- alum ensity Residential (4-8 du/ac). Nortn - berry Low Density Residential (less than 2 du Jac), South tow-Medium Density Residential (4-8 dui/ac). East - Flood Contra'. West - Chaffey College (Publi. Facilities). IV. ANALYSIS: The site is situated between properties with General Plan derignations of Very Low (less than 2 du/ac) to the north, and Low-Medium (4-8 du/ac) to the south. As a result, there is a lack of appropriate transition in land use. To make matters worse, the existing Beer Creek subdivision on the north side of Wilson, is developed in one acre residential lots, while the subject site permits development of up to 8 du/ac. This raises obvious compatibility questions, particularly along Wilson Avenue. PLANNT.NG COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 86-03b - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 24, 1986 k. Page 3 m The subject site is also , situated between a semi-rural and park- like college campus to this 'wOst and a large Flood Control area to the east. Again, .the exsting General Plandesignation does not provide for an appropriate transition of land use. The proposed change to Low Density Residential (2-4 du/ac) would appear to provide for better land use transitions, while accommodating a reasonable level of development commpatible with all surrounding land uses. The General Plan describes the Low Density category as followsc "The low density residential classification is characterized I by single-family homes. The density is appropriate where the ;• traditional n:_.:ighborhood character of detached single-family 9 y urn is prevails and .where the level of service including roads, shopping and recreatidn are not sufficient to justify a higher density." y. The subject area is semi-rural in nature and characterized 'u% detached ` single-family homes with no comme-cial establishments or ecreation facilities nearb�r. The ensiic proposed change to Low oenSity kesidential appears consistent with the General Plan criteria in all respects. i. V. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The Initial Study has been completed by staff an no o slgni Tcant a verse environmental impacts were identified to be associated with the proposal: VI. FACV FOR FINDINGS: Should the Commission, 'upon examination of the su J ecGeneral an Amendme4at and Dev-!'•opment District Amendment, decide that the change would prom;-te the land use goals and, policies of the Gejleral Plan, would not be materially detrimental to the adjacent pr)perties or would not cause significant adverse environmental impacts, t6% following are the findings that arenecessary upon approval: A-, The Amendments do not onflict with the Lard Use Policies of the General Plan; and 13. The Amendments do promote goa15 of the Land Use Element; and G. The Amendments would not Le materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties; ,and I). That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the prop", -d district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with exis-._j land use in"surrounding areas. 1177 PLANNING rOhfNIISSO}dfAFF REPORT f� GPA $6-030 CITY GF,.IRANCHO,`,CUCAMONG& September z4, 19$6 :. Page 4 .1 1d11' CORRESPONDENCE: This item hays been as'"a public hearing i n,The a� y or newspaper. The ;property was posted , and notices were sent' Y o all property owners withi;n,300 feet of the project site. y VIL,RECOMMENDATION: "Staff recommends approval of the Amendments. If the Commission 'finds the Amendments to the General ,Plan and Development District Maps warranted, adoption 0 the attached Resolutions recommending approval to thie City Council`,of the General Plan and_ Development',District Amendments and .:the issuance of a Negative V. Declaration would be .appropriate. � Re tfully S "d ��,auller R City Planner W-RY ko Attachments: Exhibit "A" - General Plan and, Developm�:+c 0i'strict Maps Exhibit "B" - Flood Control Propertyl= �'" Resolution of Approval10 - t aff _d Ltsde Y _ R69i4 ai - d Pa ' Wtt.... ..:: Y� - 1`� ee Chaffy $ College - - i General Plant L LM D .i LM_ i ' - FC CAFiYtV,) • m _; . . . .. PLANNPE? f _ { 3 COMMUNITY i M ° Development Districts NO RTII CITY car, <6F'4 F-K 0 3 RAINCHO CU ANJONG.,� TITLE _ PLANNING DIVISION �Y�. tat►lrrr< t5�:�t.G, WILSON- { Jh10 1 g0,y cut ut (1 ,j N011TI I l �p9 PA EXHIBIT RESOLUTION NO. A RESGLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86-030, X4ENDING -THE LAND USE s ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA "GENERAL PLAN FROM LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DU/AC) TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (2-4 DU/AC) FOR 66 ACRES OF LAND. LOCATED AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF WILSON (IF EXTENDE©) AND WEST OF MILLIKEN (IF EXTENii-cir'i APN 201-191-17 WHEREAS, the Planning Wpission has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all comments 0 the proposed General Plan Amendment 86- 03D. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby makes the following -n ings: A. The Amendment does `41tit conflict with the Land Use Policies of the Genera,. Plan, B. The Amendment promotes. goals of the Land Use Element. Argi C. The Amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. SECTION 2: The General-,,!Plan Land Use Map shall be amended as follows: Assessor's Parcel Number 201-1-1-17 and t15dt portion of Parcel 11 located on the west side of 'Deer Creek, aporoximately 66 acres in size, generally located on the south side of Wilson and west of Milliken, shall be changed from Low Medium Residential (4-8 dujac) to Low Residential (2-4 da/ac). SECTION 3: A Negative Declaration is,.hP;aby recommended for adoption by the Ci y Maunci for this General Plan Amendment, based upon the completion and findings of the initial Study. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission does hereby recommend approval' of General Plan Amendment 86-03D to the City Council. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman L- *:7 I �. PLANNING' COM ill Slow9k9bLUTION NO. �z.� GPA 86-030 - CITP-OF,RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 24, 1986 Page 2 AT-TEST: x Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary A I, Brad Buller, Depu Secretary oar the Planning Commission of the City of C-y' 'Rancho .Cucamonga, do,-i,.leby certify that the foregoing Resolution was day and ., regularly introduced, passted, and adopteC.,.�Y the Planning Commission o�the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular mept;mg of the Planning Commission h d on the `24th day of September, 1986, by th�,`fbllowing vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: , NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: s� �yy ANIL RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUC,,%MONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DISTRICT CHANGE NO. 86-05 REQUESTING A CHANGE,IN THE DISTRICT DESIGNATION FROM LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DU/AC) AND FLOOD CONTROL TO LOW RESIDENTIAL °(2-4) DU/AC) FOR 66 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF WILSON AVENUE EXTENDED AND DEER CREEK 'FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL WHEREAS, on the 24th day of September, 1986, the Planning Commission; held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, the General Plan Land Use Plan designates the property as Low-Medium Residential (4-8 du/ac) and concurrently to be amended to Low Residential (2-4 du/ac). WHEREAS, the proposed district change is necessary for consistency with the General Plan pursuant to Section,65860 of the California Government Code: SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the follow ingTi 3i"n ngsn 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and 2. That the proposed district change would not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties-; and S. That the proposed d'ttrict change is in conformance with the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this project w- not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on September 24, 1986. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 24th day of September, 1986, District Change No. 86-05. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt District Change No. 86-05. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. � ODA 86-05 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 24, 1986 a Page 2 P 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material-hereby adopted by the Planning Commission $hall be forwarded to the City Council. ; APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1986 , ` PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RAtXHO CUCAMONGA" BYt Dennis L. 0 , airman ATTEST:., Brad Buller, epufy ecretary I, ,Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the�janning CotmRir"f'brf of the City, of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced ,,passedi< and adopted by the Planning`��ssion of the City of ,Rancho Cucamonga, at,a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held, on the 24th day of September; 1985, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COW41ISSIONERS: i; NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT; COMMISSIONERS CITE'OF RA14CHO CUCATAONGA Gt c tl�ra STAFF REPORT z lE> DATE: September 24, 1986 W TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FRft Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Cynthia S. Kinser, Assistant Planner SUPJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86..03E reQue- o amena '-We Generalan an se map from Office to Medium Density Residential (4-14 do/ac) for 3.56 acres of land located on the southeast corner of Church and Archibald Avenue ,- APN 1077-331-02. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND. DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT C n amen men to e eve opneni Is ric ap rom `�to "M" (8-14 du/ac) for 3.56 acres of land located on the southeast corner of Church and Archibald Avenue - APN 1077-331-02. f C L. ABSTRACT: This General Plan and Development District Amendment was ini sated by the City Council. The Amendments involve a change from Ofl"Iti to Medium Density Residential for a 3.56 acre site located on the southeast corner of Church Street and. Archibald Avenue (see Exhibit "A"). Council has directed staff to bring ,a proposed changL before the Planning Commission along with an analysis and staff recommendation dur-ing this. General Plan review cycle. Staff has completed an Environmental Assessment and analysis of the proposal and recommends approval of the Amendments. II. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Amend the General Plah Land Use Map and Yevelopment u1strict Map from office and Office/Professional to Medium Density Residential. B. Location: Southeast corner of Church Street and Archibald Avenue. C. Parcel Size: 3.56 acres of land. D? Existing Development District: Office/professional. E. Existing Land Use: Vacant. JTEq M s PLANNING COMMISSIOR STAFF REPORT GPA 8G-03E & DDA 86-06 September 24, 1986 Page 2 F. Surrounding General Plan Designations: or - ow ensv y-Residential. South - Medium Density Residential. List - Medium Density Residanti'al. West - Low Density Residential G� 5Wpounding L4.nd Use and Development District Designations orth vacant; LOW Density Residential. South - Multi-family cesideatial; Medium Density Residential. East Single fsmily residence, multi-family residentialt (Medium Density Residential). West Single family residential; Low Density Residential. H. Site Characteristics: Vegetation consists of a row of uca yptus trees a ;hng Church Street, a row of tress (5) along the east side of thkk property, grasses and weeds. Mounds of dirt and rubble are throughout the site. Full street improvti-rents exist on Archibald Avenue and Church Street has yet to be developed to its full extent. III. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ANALYSIS: The Land Use Element of the ity s General Plan suppor s t e concept of higher intensity land uses at major intersections with higher residential density, commercial areas, or office designations. The General Plan further states in relation to Office Districts: "The intent of this land use category is to prevent '6s proliferation of individual isolated offices. Commer--al uaes permitted within the office category include aes nistrative and professional offices; busyness support services; financial, insurance, and real estate services Supportive commercial uses such as a restaurant; and medical services." The project site is an isolated location for Office. The site is adjacent to existing Low and Medium Density Residential neighborhoods which Rio not contain support comriercial services for the Office designation, The site is surrounded by residential uses of varying density, therefore, Medium Density Residential may be more compatible with existing uses. The General Plan discusses Medium Density Residential as foli,ows: "The Medium Density Residential classification allow, a wide range of living accommodations ranging fr,3m conventional single-family units and mobile homes to townhouses. Building intensity at the lower end of the density range would be appropriate adjacent to Low and PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 86-03E & DOA 86-06 September 24, 1986 P3ae 3 Very Low Density Residential areas. Housing types would still be characterized primarily by detached housing units. Building intensity at the higher end of the range is more appropriate adjacent -co parks and other open spaces, along transit routes and major and secondary thoroughfares, and ' near activity centers stich e,s recreational centers, libraries, shopping centers and entertainment areas. Development of this level of intensity would normally be semi-detached or attached unit. Medium Density Residential also serves as a buffer between Low Density Residential areas and areas of higher density, commercial activities and areas of greater traffic and noise levels." The project site is located adjacent to a major and a secondary arterial and abuts Medium Density areas along, its interior boundaries. An existing single-family subdivision is somewhat separated from the site by Archibald Avenue and an existing block wall on the west side of the road. Aft IV. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The Initial Study has been completed by staff and no s gni ican a verse environmental impacts were identified to be associated with the proposal. V. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Should the Commission, upon examination of the General an an evelopment Distrirt Map Amendments, decide that this change would promote the General Plan and would not be detrimental to the adjacent properties or cause significant adverse impacts as listed under the Environmental Assessment, the following findings are necessary for approval: A. The Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan, B. The Fmendment does promote the goal's of the Land Use Element, and C. The Amendment would not he materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. VI. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Daily eport newspaper and notices were sent to all property owners wwithin 30T e-at of the subject site. To date, no correspondence has been received regarding this proposal. However, on September I5th, staff received a call from one of the property owners who eipressed his opposition to the proposal change. He indicated he would be present at the public hearing to state his reasons. He believed the Office designation was appropriate and provided the opportunity for a successful development. ,..., +. �-7- PLANNING COMMISSION $TAFF REPORT GPA 86-03E t DDA,8645 aaptember 24, 1986 � Page 4 `:II. RECOMMENOAXION- It .is recommended than the Planning Commission review and consider'all materials and public input on this atemr if �,he 1f Plar�nin9 Commission , finds the Amendments' warranted; iaff recomme44s approval and adoption of the attached Resolutions recomwendinp appr'ava;l to the My Council of the General Plan Amendment, Development DistHtt Amendment, and issuance of a Negative Declaration, It the Planning Commission finds that the requestOd Amendments arf,, in conflict with the General plan and do not promote the . Goals and ObfOctives of the hand Ilse Element, adoption of_the atta--hed Resolutions of Denial t.%uld be approprixte, ' R tFully `tted• K, t:1 8u er City Planner �.� 86.CK;ko " Attachments; Exhibit "D" - Subject Site # Exhibit "0"-- General'Pan & Development Districts Resolutions of Approval' Resolutions of Denial � I.• � �' JJIKY/L v' w y z o Q _ 6oK•n ^ + ,t �/ LU ro IL` ny J '.6 h;��. i M ; uo K.tln 4 no}c.n ,, o :ci•'m 3 >. � , ` -Jc JRP.J.CIH Stlft 1 7 •• s '� ~ Prll•1rn J 22 1] fl'1•i v o'er{ I 3a` AF SanjGGfi f 4 g e Icl zz II SI 20{'et U{ IJ a;t� • ¢ e j Medium IS II 4 9 1 7 6 6 ia ®ffipG£ 6®, 6YeV��99 �>e H l �1. 17 la J9 le ii W 13 a3 IY 19 I2 M 1 i}.87 If{6 t'.•.y 65J il• .��d'.Lf N� M.Ia4Z aV30• (.F•r ' I ; { t •' W ,i wa?.. 1 R a i"D 6 v a s 2 ( *ELNWtK -5 � CO • .. • n t iI n uaal am Z E{f ue n WaY C J 164 I 6]?/• Itl 62•Q 1. 9 _1 t4 (� T �.li 19}O 21 zt SJ 7 ZS Sfi 7 z8 t9].,it JS]] fJ-, l-1 .J J�-1 .�}� .� • ()1} _O.i1VE� s Let.�.0'q: _,../1�+:• a -J, i YNORTH CITY Or, ITGNI.,_G A d�•O�E. DD1� B�S�fm RANCHO CUCANMONL GA TITLE: S,-rer PLANNING DIVISION M��- EXHIBIT) SG1LE General Plan LM OP NGIA M O OP, NC. LM J MH - 1l—rfrY•uta�r mr —.� Development Districts NO RTII 'ITY CIF P� 8b•o3E Ah RANCHO CUGE NIaNGA TITLE C-4e�a�>�w�'� I'LANNING DIVISON -. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION rF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENP.:NG APPROVAL OF GENWL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 86-03E - 1TY, AMENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO CUPAMONGA GENERAL PLAN. FROM OFFICE TO MEDIUM DENSITY RES:OEN "IAL,(4-14 GU/AC) FOR 3.56 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CHURCH STREET AND ARCHIGALD AVENUE WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed General Plan Amendment No.86 03E. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby makes the f oil owing �,n Mngs: A. The Amendment does not.,,conflict with the 'Land Use Policies,,of the General Plan. B. The Amendment pi Totes: goals of the,Land Use Element. C. The Ameni not be materially injurious' or detrimental to the ayacent properties. Aft SECTION 2: The Genera Plan Land Use flop shall be .amended as follows: Assessor's Parcel Number 1077-331-02. approximately 3.56 acres in size and located on the southeast corner of Church Street and Archibald Avenue shall be changed from Office to Medium Density Residential (4-14 du/ac). SECTION 3 A Negative Declaration is hereby recommended for adoption byte ty Council for this General Plan Amendment, based upon the completion and findings of the Initial Study. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission does hereby recommend approval of General Plan Amendment No. 86-03E to the City Council. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY Or SEPTEMBER, 1?96. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO-iGA BY: ennis L. S t, Chairman _ AWL ATTEST: Brad Buller, epu y ecre ary H— e '. I 'PLANNING COMMISSION 9ESOLUTIO1-4 No. 7 j CPA 8G-L13E C111� OF RANC lD� 1CPt�i01GA September 24, 1985 Page 2" w, Brad Busier, D�fputy Secretary of the Planning Commission,of"the City of Rancho Cucamonga, o hereby,certify that the fa going Resolution was duly and reguiariy introd4Ad, passed. and adopted by j to Planning Commission of the City of Rancho-Cucamonga, at a regular. meeting Qf the Piannirtg Commission heft y an the 24th day of SeptAmber,.:i986, by the following vote-to.wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT:: COMMISSIONW: `'x r RESOLUTION NO. A .RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMIS1',TrI RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DISTRICT ..MANGE NO. 81-0&,i REQUESTING A(CHANGE IN THE DISTRICT DESIGNATION FROM a OFFICE/PROFESSIONAL TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL f1a 3.56 ACRES ':'OcATED ON nTNE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CHURCH' STREET AND Q%2CHIBALD AVENUE WHEREAS, on the 15th day of July, 1986,. an application was filed and accepted on the above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 24th day of September, 1946, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing, pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code, ;;. SECTION 1: The Rand;) Cucamonga Planning Commission has .made the following findings; 1. That.the subject property is suitable for the uses _ permitted in the proposed district in terms or access, size, and compatibil.ty with existzng land ' use in the surrounding area; and 2. That the proposed district change would not have significant 1mpact on the environment nor the surroundipg properties; and 3.. That the proposed district change is in conformance with the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this proaeef-w rrnot crate a significant adverse,, mpact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Nega0re Declaration ors"September 24, 1986. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of. the California Government ,Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the R4th day of September, 1986, District Change No. 86-06. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt District ChangeNo. 86-06. 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission Ak hall be f s o w' r aided to the City Council'. 2 P1 AN G COM�SI SIGN RESOL, o NO. b 4 8� 6 - CITY ('F RAPlC3i0 O GAMONGA Sspt. er 24, I$86 Page 2 a APPROVED AND AQOPTCD.TiiIS 24TH UAY OF SEPTEMBER, 19,86. PL,'1;1f w COMMISSION OF THE CITY Or,-RA CUC4iMONOA jt BY. enns L. tout, _ airman ., <:. . i Brad u er, epu ec :arY .� t, Brad Butler, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Convission of the City of r Y, tJ�. Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the feregning Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adapted by:the Planning Cnmsftsion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning GommSs_s.,-r^n held f on the 24th day of September, 1986, by the Wing vgte-to-wit: AYES. COtdMESSIONERS. t" HOES. COMMISSIONERS. ABSEN"i. COMMISSIONERS Aft RESOLUTION NO. I. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING C014MISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING 'DENIAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMZwAENT NO. 86-03E-CITY, REQUESTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND.USE ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO CUrAMONGA C GENERAL PLAN FROM OFFICE TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (4-•14 DU/AC) FOR 3.56 ACRES ,OF LAND LOCATED ON THE I SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CHURCH STREET AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed General .Plan Amendment No, I, 86-03E. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission cannot make the fol I owi ng a nT'�ngs. A. The Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan. B. The Amendment promotes goals of the Land Use Element. C. The Amendment would not be matarialTy injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission does hereby recommend denial of General Plan Amendment No.86-03E; APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TIJ DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary I, 'brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify,that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of September, 1986, by the following vote-tn-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS; ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ,> RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF DISTRICT CHANGE NO. 86-06 REQUESTING A .CHANGE IN THE DISTRICT DESIGNATION FROM 4FFICE(PROFESSIONAL. TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL FOR 3.56 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CHURCH STREET AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE WHE6`EAS, on the 15th((day of July, 1986, an application was filed and accepted on tl-,•,above='describe project; and 7 WHEREAS, on the 24th day of September, 1986, the Planning Commis0 on held a duly advertised public hearing' pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. - r, SECTION 1: The Ranchr, Cucamonga Planning Commission caRr,a make th6i following findings 1. That the subject,property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terns of access, size, and compatibility,with existing land use in the surrounding ir'ea `and 2. That the proposed district change would not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and 3. That the proposed district change is in conformance with the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Commission hereby recommends—denial o Development,District Amenc..,ent 86-06. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS mn DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stbut, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy ecretary - 12 ax c , PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. - ODA 8646 - DENIAL - CITY OF'RANUO CUCAMONGA September 24, 1986 Pare 2 I, Brad aul i er, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Comnissi on of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do"herztiy certify that the foregoing Resolution was du regularly introduced 9 if and 9 , passed, and adopted by the Planning'Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Piaaning Commissiot, held a, on the 24th day of September, 1986, by the following vote-to-wit: rZ ' AYES: COMMISSIONERS: T NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS; t CITY OF RA.NCIO CUC.4i1AQNGA �1�wcln,o�c t. STAFF REPORT y �0 o Z DATE: September 24, 1986 1977 TO: 6ai'rman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad. Buller, Senior Planner BY: Rubin_Yu, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86-03 reques to q en�lie text o e enera an W uding the definition of Medium Density Residential from 4-14 dwellfng units per acre to 8-14 dwelling units per acre ai4 the general descripti::n of the Medium Residential land use category. t ABSTRACT: This is a request initiated by the City council to amen a text of the General Pan and to modify the definition of Medium Density Residential frc14-14 dwell- ig units per acre to 8- ILI dwelling units per acre. At `this meeting, after public input, the Commission will make a determination regarding the General Plan Amendment. Approval of ai RR the Amendment is recom mended. II. BACKGROUND: In 1981, the City adopted its General Plan. The Plan es a isnss six residential density categories: Density ( rose avera� . Category - Minimum MaximumVery - Low Low 0.1 2 2 4 Low Medium 4 8 Medium 4 14 Medium. Higb 14 24 High 24 30 The Medium Density Residential (4-14 du/ac) under the City's General Plan is intended tr, provide "a wide range of living accommodations ranging from conventional single-family units and mobile n i4 names to townhouses." As a resu , there is an overlap of density rapges in the LM (4-8 du/ac) and M (4-14 du/ac) categories. ITEM N PLANNING COWISSIDN STAFFof Rancho Cucamonga ;+ GPA 86-U3 . Text - City September 249 1986 Page 2 { e as 8-14 du/ac. ;- its DevelOpmedni rang hich defineseater 11t 1983, the the City adopted p w'Jac and Me Low Medium rar.,ge as : General plan range wit confusion to rovide a suited in some this was intended ract ce, tF;e overlap r flexibility. direction in certa' areas. --la ck of cl ear directed the the City Council receilttothe roblem, text Amendment to o/ac and to Te allene viate the pe a 14 dulac 8-14 dujac staff t0 in�tYaResidential lfrom n4^ Medium Density description„ot Mediu[n Residential accord►ngly• modify the general III. A_N_ALYY entia land tween General Plana D a ela resi nXtIade;living 4 n9 A. Roati onsFt*`ye a g um, ei en range of Ines wide units enera an which provides lea singlrange from 4-14 use category" from cor •enticnal to g f om with a density acc,omnodations ranging dn%l mobile homes urilts per gross acre. defined Mediurz Residential Code, however, multiple family use The Development area for medium density rocs acre. District as, anrange from 8-14 units per g betwen w with a density reatar consistency The proposed'`change would bring 9 the General Flan aid Dev to pori es Code,and el anti Hate confusion in residential density categories'?he current Medium Density Im lIn ementation: of density (4-14 du/ac)• B, Problem of a-�' range arm-tteo density rangee of e m t °n provi es practice, the hi Sherthe la er end of the dens- y normally requested, lamented.. Medium Residential has seldom been imp - XT AMENDMENT text ,V. REQ__ D Gam—l PLAN 'ir}____ osed changes are direction, staff recommendsP�P following Based on Council (Pages 33-341• amendment to the General Plan Shown in bold type- be e5tablishaa for categories shale range of ,building Six residential densitythe City with ° purposes of providingto deal wi h various-site intensities athat -111OW nd opportunities- k constraints PLANyI�l6OMMISSIOg STAFF REPORT GPA 86wO3 - Text- City of Rancho Cu amonga y September 24, 1986, Page 3 f, Density Cross average) Category Minimum Maximum Very Low 0.1, ::ow 2 4 Loci Medium 4 g tledi um 8 14 MediumHigh 14 24 ` High " 24 30, Medium (8-14 dkell ng units •'gross acre). The medium density resl ential classification allows liiving accoaxodatieas for medium dtnsiiy multiple family use, with site development regulations that assure development co&vatible rt[ith nearby lower density residential development. Kedium density residential serves as a, buffer between lower density rejidenti,al areas and areas of high^..` density, commercial activi ties`dnd areas of greater traffic and noise levels. V. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: The Initial Study has been compls,.ted, '5taff has found no significant adverse impacts attributed to the �roposed amendment., No significant. environmental impacts are -xpe.ted. No mitiga•eion measures are needed. VI. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: "hould the Commission, upon examination of e enera an ext An.%%ndment,,decide that the change of Medium Reside',.. al definitionldebcription would promote the '.and use goals and poli0es of the General Plan, would not be materially detrimental to any properties or would not cause significant adverse environmental impacts, the following are the findings that are necessary upon approval: a. T`+e Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan, and; b. The Amendment does promote goals of the land use element, and; - c. The Amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to any properties. VII. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a-pub?i., hearing n e ai y sport newspaper. r ` r PLA94ING COMISSIDN STAFF -RtPORT GPA C6-08 Text �- City Of Rancho Cucamonga September'24, 1986 Page.,4 VM. ttECOMt1E11OATIOM: It is recommended that the Planning Commission review an consider :all mat6eals, and, public input on this item. x' If the Commission finds an.Ame-xt meat�to the.General Plan Text is warranted, adoption of :the ed Resolut'r,n recommendf iq a approval to.the City council of the, Gens,r41 Plan Text Amendm x and the issuance of ,a Negative Oeclarati n would he appropriate. a Respe tfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner .� BB:RY•ns s. Attachments: Resolution of ApprovalAoki h , 1 1 RESOLUTION NO. ' A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL'I`ORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL'PLAN'AMENDMENT NO. 86-03 AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN. WHEREAS, the Planning comriission has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed General Plan Amendment No.86- -03. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLV76, that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission does hereby recommend approval to the City Council of the following amendment to the Text of the General Alan. SECTION I The General Ryan Text (pages 33-34) shall be amended as follows: a Six residential density categories shall be e=_tablished for purPOSOs of providing the City with a range of building intensities that allow flexibility to deal wig various site constraints and opportunities. Oensi y igross average) Category Minimum Maximum Very Low 0.1 2 Low 2 4 Low Medium 4 8 Medium 8 14 Meeium High 14 z4 High 24 30 Very Law (up to -2 dwelling units per gross acre). The very low resi en 7al category is characterized by single-family hones oil, one- half acre lots, or larger, as c�mmoniy found worth of banyan Street and in the northeast portion of the'City. Low (2--4 dwelling units per gross acre). The low density residential classifiration is characterized by single-family homes. The density is appropriate where the traditional neighborhood character of &cached single-family units prevails and where the level of services including roads, shopping and recreation are not sufficient to justify a highEr density: Low Medium (4-8 dwelling units per gross acre). The low-medium r`al-eg`ory is characterized by residential densities somewhat greater than the low density residential group. With gross densities averaging between 5-8 dwelling units .per acre, considerably more housing types may be used, including typical single-family, single- Resolution No. n GPA 8G-03 September 24, 1986 Page 2 family zero lot line', duplex;acid under certain conditions up to 4-6 tovmhouse-type units, This category would be appropriate Within low density areas to encourage greater housing diversity without changing 4., the single-family character of the surrounding residential character. Medium (8-14 dwelling units per gross acre). The ,medium density resv e`ntial classification allows living accommodations for medium density multiple 1'family use, with site. development regulations that assure development, compatible with nearby lower density residential development. Medium densiV residential serves as,a buffer between low density residential areas and areas of fi,�+her &1` sity, commercial a. activities and area% of greater traffic and na se levels. Medium-High (14-24 dwelling units per gross acre). This medium-high residenMiT density categary is typified by low condominiums and apartment buildings. This, density is appropriate in proximity to major community facilities and employment 'opportunities and. along i major thoroughfares High (25-30 dwelling units per gross acre). The high density residential category is predominantly characterized by apartment units and condominiums occurring at 3-6 stories in height. This density is appropriate near community shopping Complex and in proximity to centers of employment, o A planned development approach to residential development is encouraed because it provides greater flexibility for the con project' ce t. :Where. site co nditions onditiorrmerit, shall encourage the clustering of housing which alows the City maximum usage. of land while retaining -..needed open space and other amenities. o Areas specially designated in Figure III-1 shall be considered areas where master planned developments are mandatory. SECTION 2; A N j�ative Declaration is hereby recommended for adoption by t e C ty Counci; far this General Plan Amendment, based upon the completion and findings of the Initial Study. A Resolution ,No.. GPA 86-03 , September 24, 1986 Page 3,. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SE°TEMBER, 1986. J PLANNING COMMISSION OF`THE CITY OF RANCHO,CUCAMONGA BY: ennis L. Stout., afi trman ATTEST: ;y Brad 'Buller, Deputy Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of �r Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoiny',Resoluti:on was duly and,, regularly introduced, passed; and adopted by the Planning Commission of th6e(! ?ty of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission hela))! on the 24th day of September, 1986,, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: n NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT,. COMMISSIONERS: r- I � t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CLCA&1'0 MEMORANDUM pIt DATE: September 24, 1986 vim' 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Rubin Yu, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86-03F - request Q amen a t ener-a Plan Land Use map trom Medium Residential (4-14 du/ac) to Lew-;tedium Residential (4-8 du/ac), for 3.67 acres of land, located an the northwest corner of'19th Street and Archibald Avenue - APN: 202-1091-21: I. ABSTRACT: This is a Staff initiated General Plan Amendment from e flum ensity Residential to Low-Medium Density Residential for a 3.67 acres site located on the northwest corner of 19th Street and j' Archibald Avenue. At this meeting, after public input, the Commission will make a• determination regarding the General Plan Amendment._ Approval is recommended. YI. BACKGROUND: In November 6, 1985, a General Plan, Amendment was approved for the subject site from,,Office to Medium Residential (4-14 du/ac). The City Council approved the Amendment with an understanding that this property would not be developed at more than eight (8) units per acre, and that the property owper would initiate a zone change to LM (4-8 du/ac), Recently, the City approved such a request for a Development District Amendment (DDA 86-01) to Low-Medium Residential- (4-8 du/ac) for the subject property. This is consistent with the existing General Plan range of 4-14 du/ac. However, the City is concurrently amending the definition of Medium Density Residential of the General Plan from 4-14 dwelling, units per acre to 8-14 dwelling units per acre (see Staff Report _ on GPA 86-03-TEXT). Since the subject property is limited to a maximum density of eight (8) units per acre-by the Development Code, the change in the General Plan definition would create an incoslsistency between the General Plan and zoning. III. PROJECT"AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Actien Requested: Change; General Plan Land Use Map for su 3ec site rom Medium Residential (4-14 du/ac) to Low.. Medium Residential (4-8 du/ac). ITEM 0 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION September 24, '1986 GPA 86-03 F Page 2 B. Locatic,i: Northwest corner of 19th Street and ArWilal,T Avenue. C. Parcel Sf.'te. 3.61 acres D. Existing z.:Ping- Low-Medium Residential ( M) E. Existing Land Use: Vacant, undeveloped F. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: - North ` Vacant, designated Medium Residential (8-14 du/ac) Foothill freeway Corridor, designated Low Residential (2-4 du/ac). South Existing single family subdivision, designated tow Residential (2-4 du/ac) small lot subdivision to the southeast, designated Low-Medium Residential (4-8 du/ac). East Existing neighborhood shopping center, designated Neighborhood Commercial. West - Single family residence, vacant land, designated Medium Residential (8-14 du/ac). G. General Plan Designations; Project Site - Medium Residential (4-14 du/ac)_' North - Medium Residential (4-14 dulac), Foothill Freeway Corridor South Low Residential (2-4 du/ac), Medium Residential (4-14 du/ac) to the southeast. East Neighborhood Commercial West - Medium Residential (4-14 du/ac). H. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant with a slope of approxima e y . .xisting vegetation consists of low growing - grasses and weeds. There are no known cultural or historical values attributed to this site. i IV. ANALYSIS: The subject site is currently limited to 4-8 du's/ac by its:zoning and General Plan designations, The proposed Amendment I will not ;hange permitted development density. Rather, it is an administri:tive change necessitated by the modifications in the definitiosi of Medium Density from 4-14 du/ac to 8-14 du/ac, it out ttiis Amednment, the permitted der,•,ity on the site would actually imcrease, and the General Pian and zoning would no longer be crsnss� rs `- i V. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSTS: The Initial Study has been completed. 51-aff has found no significant adverse impacts attributed to tha proposed amendment. No significant environmental impacts are expected. No mitigation measures are needed. I PLANNING COMMISSION RtSOLUTION i September 24, 1986 i u GPA 8643 F f. Page 3 -3 > VI. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: *' hould the..Commissien__ upon examination of Tff e uenera an en� t, decide that the change from Medium Density Residential to (it, Density=,gesidential would `{ promote the'1and:use goaj,^ and policies of the General Plan, would not be, materially detrimental to the adjacent properties or would not cause significant adverse environmental impacts, the following, are the findings that are necessar.,y upon approva'L: . a, The Amendment does not conflict with the Land- Use Poiic4s`of the General Plan, and; b. .;ie Amendment does promote goal's of the land ' use'element, and; (4 c. The; . Amendment, would not be materially injurious or 'detrimental ,to ,the <adjacent properties. G VII. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in a ai y deport newspaper, the property :posted, and notices were sent to proper y owners within 300 feet of the project sil¢e. f VIII. RECOMMENDATION-, Staff recorr;ends approval of the General Plan Amendment. � the Commission, fiPds the Amendment warranted adoption of thanattached Resolution recommeading aproval .to the City Council of the General Plan Amendment and the issuance of a ,Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Res tfully sub ted,' BRAD BULLLR City Planner BB:RY:dak Attachments: Exhibit"A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - General Plan Usolution of Approval AOL 1; _ -- avv I�u +c"J' ; (VACANT-} -51rdN ENTIA,4N .�T.; LOW�fu• 1: , LOWw-Rr1EGJ�IN�EFN-,� TTfi�. jL tiS 3- 2=4frYl' ��G" (v/IGi1�lT`) �.vt�7a/uti•- ' RL-a.= Go��Ni�Gl,4�-•� (Isxti.T/VT 'N c vc—V. %,`' Subject's to r-reUs�= -- G W RMonly ,a GQGV v UNI NURTI-I CITY OF lalk, RANCHO CC'ANIONC t1. `I ITIX-..1.4CATIOAl MAP_P_ PLANNING DIVISION t.-m it trt: 'A' SCALE.- I m e , a i inrvs.++w wrAarr titetwa �t"ea kameca fias- •` -�b..1 s� A21fY�Iff cswsert m rwd : . �_ `i -!c i• . yg�-!•' Qom:�9 �a �� tea• ��. r Y T• � •� •� • a �trY •:f # !� f r PA Ate_ .a • ♦, Y Y Y t r.., General Plan NO RTII '� ;�I CI-10 CUCZ-"'I0NCt TITS: -- 12A L- PA,Akl I'LANNI\G DIVISION EXI IIIII T- 13 SCALD- 44 RESOLUTION NO. r� A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OFiTHE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENQ;NG APPROVAL OF f` GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 86-03F, AMENOAG THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO CUCA14ONGA GENERAL PLAN r WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a duly advertised public i hearing to consideK~; l comments on the proposed General Plan Amendment No. fra-03F; SECTION 14 Th`e Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission 1.2-reby makes �1 I he following findings: A. The Amendment does not (7onflict with the Land.-.Use Policies of the General Plan. { B. The Amendment promcties goals of the Land Use Element. C. The Amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. SECTION 2: Tile General Plan Lana Use Map shall be amended as fol l ow,: Assesso 's Parcel 'Number 202-101-21, approximately 3.67 acres in t4z,^-Znd located on thA north side of 19th St., west of Archib ld, shall be changed from Medium Density Resident'. 4 (4-14 du/acre) to==row-Medium Density Residential (4-8 du/acre). ;ti SECTION 3: A Negative Declaration is hereby 'recommended for adoption by e l y Council for this General Plan Amendment, based upon the completion and f;'r;dings of the Initial Study., A. NOW, 'THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that to the City Council. the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission does hereby recor&end approval of General Plan Amendment No. 86-D3F ;, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY ,OF SEPTEMBER, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO 000AMONGA BY: - ennts ., Stout, Chairman ATTEST:- Brad u er, ePu y ecre ary PLANNING COK41SSION RESOLUTION � �.•1 � A., September, 24,, 1986 ,z t GPA 86-03F -„ Page 2 o 'r r I, Brad Buller, Ueputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of m Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby��certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly ::traduced, pass(ld, and adopted oy the Planning Comm4ssian of _k e ._ City of Rancho Cucamonga, a_t,a regular meeting of the Planning Commission h4l d on the 24th day of September, 1986, by the following vote-to-wit ' AYES: COMMISSIONERS: r= NOES: COMMISSIONERSc ABSENT: COMVII STONERS: i r p r k 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMNGA ��CAA {, STAFF REPORT ° ° F Q � U 73 > DATE: Septemter 24, 1986 5977 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City;Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Associate Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86-09 - BIXBY - The review of the proposed Master Plan Design Guideiines for compliance of conditions of approval for a 35-acre master site plan, located between Milliken Avenue and Pittsburgh Avenue 1 and between 4th Street and 6th Street - APN 229-261-581 ' .4. I. ABSTRACT: The developer is requesting approval of the Master Plan esign Tuidelines whicn would serve as a design guidelines for future development. II. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission, at its regular meeting of June 2 86, conditionally approved a 26 acre master plan and Phase I development as shown in Exhibit "A". The conditions of approvai--for the Master'Plan require that the developer submit Master Plan Design Guidelines for future development. The purpose of this Master Plan Design Guidelines is to create a single unified development within and to emphasize a pedestrian-oriented, campua- like setting, but maintaining individual iden'_4ty. Attached for your review is a copy of the proposed Master Plan Design Guidelines. III. ANALYSIS• The proposed Master Plan Design Guidelines consist of _ seven chapters. The first two chapters provide background information regar- ng the Master Plan and tree order of the plan review process within the Bixby Business Park. References have been made in Chapt_r 2 regarding the required City Development Review process. Chapters 3 ttirough 7 establish design guidelines in the areas of site planning, landscaping, architecture, lighting plan, and sign program. The following sections are discussions on how these guidelines comply with the conditions of approval as - stated in attached Resolution 86-90. Condition No. 1 states that a Master Plan is ipproved in concept only and future development for each parcel shall be subject o ! Development/Design Process for Planning Commission approval. t ! Staff Comment: Chapters 1 and 2 reference the .City's required Development Re irl Process. ITEM P , Pt,ANVING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT OR 85-09 - BIXBY September 24, 1986 Page 2 Condition No. 2 requires that design of the Master Plan shall emphasize "campus-like setting" by varying the landscape/building setback beyond,the minimum average 45 feet for Milliken.Avenue, 4th Street, and 5th Street, and minimum average 25 feet for Pittsburgh -Avenue and 5th Street. Staff Comment: Chapter 3,4, page 13 of the Master Plan Design uz a 'fines provides such criteria with graphics to illustrate t!e ` intent of this condition. Condition Nm--3 requires that perimeter landscaping for the entire Master Plan be provided to emphasize-the image of the campus like setting with a unifying landscapinS, theme and continuous walk,-d4y, Staff Comment: Exhibits "c:I t rough C5" show the pi tailed an scat ng designed for the perimeter landscaping.. The attached letter from the landscape designer explafrs ltaw the design incorporates continuos' meandering walks V4>r, as,� g , _ ground cover, und;-lating mounding wrth 'Eucalyptus and Pinc groves and Camphor groves as an accent dd;ign at each corner of project entrance or street corners. Chaptet*, 4 of the Master Plan Design Guidelines, provides criteri-, to titerface the perimeter landscaping with interior, landsc&p;nv desIgn of plaza, courV.,74s, lunch courts, side and rear yard areas. However, she predominant ,Ise of turf as a ground cover for the entire perimeter of the project site cLnfl cts with the City's Policy to conserve water. Based on the-_``a dttape setbar"_ of 35 feet (the 4' sidewalk not included? an Mt ..rien, 4th and bth, and 21 feet on Pittsburgh Avenue, amoun`-f. turf area 6 approximately 4 acres, The conditions, of appr6© .i req,�,i,�$ water and Energy conservation techniques such as d`.'ought tolera;& plant materials, alluvial roekscape, etc. Staff reccrz ods that the amaunt of turf area for the perimeter landreaping b, reduced and that drought tolerant ground cover%shrubs and alluvial-rockscapes be introduced. Condition go. 4 requires that a landscape prog am shall be developed to establish installation and maintanance criteria for the shared planter islands at the interior property Tines. Staff Commere Chapter 5, page 37 Of the Master Plan Design ui a ones provides criteria for maintaining a shared planter island in the interior property lines. Gcndition No. 5 requires a uniform design program for security fencing, Staff Comment: chapter 3, page 22 of the Master Plan Design uM a Ines Provides sus, uniform design program. for security fencing. ,�. "..R". . - da PLANKING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT OR 86-09 - BIXBY September 24, 1986 Page 3 Cond*t`op 6 requires that pedestrian connections from- sidewalk to building be provj ded..and that all pedestrian pathways,and driveway entra;;ces be provided with"texturiaed pavement of such materiajs as brickspaver$,,exp;sed aggregate, or a combinati60 of them. Staff Comment: Chapter 5, page 36 of the Master Plan Design �u€ a ine-T' ss provides. snph criteria., Staff reco!iu�nrds- deletion of reference to trp9m-finished'.c6crete. .onditi�� lVa 7 raquireF,,,that the developer provida location- and conceptual design of transit stop: and other mlated pedestrian facilities. �Zaff Comment,• The.,proposed Master,isan Design Guicslines does not provi da any criteria or conceptual design of any transit stops and related pede�,tr:°an facilities. According to the developer,' OmniTr;7% has indicated to them that transit ptops,ralbng Milliken Avenue are not included in their 5-year plan.- The C ty's Traffic Engi nee:^ also stated that°bus service along Mil l ike;f is some time in the future. Providir_a a dedicated area for"bus:stop would be o prepriate at this time. Staff recommends that the develuper add i. criteria in the Master Plan Pcsign Guidelines as follows; T(e developer, Bixbv Ranch Company, shall be resperisible for providing transit stop and bus shelter located-.at Sth Street and Milliken Avesje and at 4th Street and hill-riken Avenue. The precise location of the transit stops and the conceptual -,ssign of the bus shelter shall:..be sutmitted for City Engineer and City Plarriew review and approval at such time that bus services are available along Milliken Avenue." Condition No. 8 states that conceptual design, of the Gatet..`�, shall be provided to 4th Si:eet and Milliken Avenue, and smaller scare project entry statement shall be emulated at 6th Street and Milliken Avenue, 6th Street and Pittsburgh, and 4th Street and Pittsburgh. Staff. Comment; Exhibit"B" shows the concept,t., Iesign of the Gamey with vcreet names on both sides; The de!,Ign of the Gateway sign consists of aluminum cabinet on steel tube support with o Neigh. of 3 112 feet. .. A hedgerav will be planted behind the Gatew, sign wit',,, a scaly^tus Grove emphasizing' the City's heritage. Staff is seeking Cammission discusson of the proposed design. . �FLANNIK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 8649 — BIXAY September 24,, 1986 Page 4 Condition No. 9 requires that 'a Uniform Sign Program be developed for the entire Master Plane . Staff-Comment:; Staff has reviewed the Uniform Sign'Program and has le ermine i to be consistent with the current Ci-y`s Sign Ordinance except for the proposed color scheme for wall signs. According to the Proposed sign,criteria, a light shade accent color firli sh for the letter face will be placed on the wing wa i 1 s with the darkest shade of the accentcolor.fnish on the wing walls, and vice versa. In addition to the varPge of; accent colors, a 'tenant l could also use the saw, buiiiding color for the ,sign fate. Assuq.=;ng only one occupant-per ;building and per rarcd w;th ;i the htas,°r ' Plan, there is the pro:,;abili-y of 13 different colors of sign fate for the 13 parcels. The Desig?r Ieview Committee reviewed the color chema in relation to the Unifori, Sign, Program and recommended that on'y one and' the same consistent shade from the four shades provided be designated 4s the color or the sign face from the proposed six accent ca'.gr theme. The purpose of tho required designated shade of colork::for the sign face is to limit the range of colors for the sign. : However, the develcper.wisl.es to maintain the design theme of contrasting the light and dark shades bei.:een wing walls and wall signs. Staff recommends V`,, jrl alternative �,o the Design Review Cowittee's recotnrendationf .,"eliminate the ? 1 middle shades from the 6 accent color them' ,3 ill as the option to use 'U F'.3 building colhrs.;theme for the, Cund'.tion No. 10 requires that pedestrian plazas or courtyards be providad immediately adjacent to or near the perimeter greer:elt to denote the campus-like set-in; and serve as 'a focal point. Staff Gommedt: Chapter 4, arckitects,ral guideline;; of the Master, Min— es:gn--Guiif i1res provides criteria in encouraging such pedestrian platk are-- couMit,,,krus, Condition No. 11 requiraK x�iat the architectural guidelines should incorporate criteria i:hat encourages variation in architectural planes, at .icuilation cf elevation surfaces, pro,xect a fbraal building entry statement, and zccent treatment such as changes ^n exterior materialr :ml.texturr. Staff Comment: Chapter 4 of the architectural guidelires of the Mastern an`Design Guidelines have inccrporatrid these criteria, recommenas that w 6e Kota ra hs showr`on Page 3 should enlaced, Ana p g P provided cr: separate pages to illustrate a as` °F---chiLectUral design features. i I r PGAyN'�NG CO MM1•SSION STAFF REPORT OR,86-09 --.Bl)"By September 24, 1986 sPage 5 ((t( .. j k w6en the north .IR states h2 a through the u5 a of landscaping, n9 condition llf, , a-, 'sout4i ofi 5th street ;t provided „ landscaping design ; Staff Comanant,t Exhibits 11C4 and C5 I sis' the , 5th Street tha are Consistent with one another. 0 o sz, es of r ��, ;;oA 13 requires that",jn�each parc samples and `cal or he Conditti provided fork 0tdividual developnen rent: The developer has ,jti,ievattons whiched a l the nDesi9 for t ruval, as shown in Staff ;a.npTes and colors ' Guidelines. Howeve�:� staff is R ,�i ew Committee ;Ias revi 6+� ,d and ,reconiaendeo'app acceni colors late to' Uniform page 53 of the Master Plan Design coneerned with the wide range of and hC(3 k for o a discussed undnt er�C nditionNo- each Q . Sit, ProgramCommission IV. RaC0+1M`cIDAT10N"t Staid recommends that and the Plaide nning he. as er Plan Design Guide hp�per meter 1andssap�n "e s it ms conservati) n techniques: _ . deveio�er tgith dttaction regarding uv _ relates to the condition requiring energy ti ie addi ti o�.` drought, tvleran�� g�."+und tY��vv,a?lh signs-,pubs and', or, al!rvva}- such as a design.i,i Tre app the range of colors forr,,.l 0uidrlines could rockscape, b stops, and the Uia�t_way criteria for transi,. o,, pditional approval of the Master P1ar De,t9 be done through Minute Action. Re filly Witted, grad Buller Ci:x V1 anner !sB:NF:ns Resolution No. 86-y0 and S1atodartbeenPlanning Co„mission Attachments- Letter from Runa G;oup dated SepteMber 4, 1986 _ regarding the landscaping Theme, Proposed MaaterAppran Des M�.gper�Paanines Exhibi c ,A" Exh`-it 6,11 - Gateway Design Exhibit "C -Detailed Perimeter s.andscape and Irrigation Plans AMk - s1rWAN l ilwalm RESOLUTION NQ. 86-90 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING C"MMISSION APPROVING DEVELCPMENT REVIEW 10. 86-09 FOR A ,. ACRE `MASTER PLAN AND PHASE I DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF MASTER LIGHT MANUFACTURING BUILDINGS TOTALING 63,474 SQUARE FEET,". ` LOCATED BETWEEN MILLIKEN AVENUE AND PITTSBURGH AVENUEi;AND t-, BETWEEN 6TH STREET AND 4TH STREET, DI.4TRICT IN THE .INDUSTRIAL WHEREAS, on the 5th day of June 1986, a complete application vas filed by Bixby oevelopmert Ltd. One -for review of the above-described project; and WHEREAS, on-the 11th day-of June, 1986 the�-lancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting 'to consider the a6ave-described <project and :ontinued to June 25 1986 regular meeting; and WHEREAS, on the 25th da; of June, 1986,-,the Rancho Cucamonga Planning R Commission held a meeting to,,consider the above-desc abed pro0ec+�.. NOW, THEREFORE; the Rancho Cucamonga Planning„Cr,,,,,, s oC resolved as follows:_ I�a SECTION 1: That the followin `'car, be,(met: 1. That the proposed' project is con�istent with the objectives of the General Plan; -aNJ 2. That the rrlposed use is in accord with the object?ve o I•f°. The dustrial Specifir Plan and the purposes ai the distr..Sct in which the site is located; am 3. That the Proposed use is i, compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific I Plan; and 4. That the proposed use,,cogether with the conditions applicable thereto, v;ill j..,t be detrimental to the Public health, safety, ct welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements' in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That this project will not ,_reate.adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued 00 June 25, 1986. SECTION 3: That Development Review 'No. 86-09 is approved subject to the following conditions and attached Standard Conditions: { G Resolution No. 86_If DR 86-09 June 25, 1,J86 Page 2 PLANNING:DI'liSIoi! A. taster Plan. 1. The Master Plan is approved in coii�cept only and future ` development for each . parcel sj�al1 be subject to Development/Design review process fil?r Planning Commission approval,' Modifications to the.,Oaster Flan shall be subject to Planning Commission apprdyal. 2. "Campgs-like setti;ig" for the Mauer Plan shall be _. emph4tized by providing landscape bid hardscape along at least one entire street frontage per parcel and"by.,varying the landscape/building setback beyond the minimum average 45 ft. for Milliken. Avenue, 4th Street, and 6th Street, and minimum average 25 ft.-for Pittsburgh Avenue and 5th Street: 3. Perimeter landscaping for the Pntire site/Master Plan . shall be provided with Phase I development to emphasize the image of the "campus-li.ke setting" with a unifying landscape theme and continuous pedestrian walkway. 4. A landscape program establishing installation and maintenance criteria for the shared planter islands at the _. in.`Prior property lines` shall be developed and approved with the Master Plan.` 5. A uniform design jrogram for security fencing, shall be developed and approved with the Master')-:Ian and subject to the approval of Foothill Fire District and the City Planner. 6. Texturized pavement identifying pedestrian paths shal',- be r provided at all driveway entrances and shall be of brick pavers, exposed aggregate, or a combination of them, subject to City Planner approval; and pedestrian connections shall be provided from the perimeter sidewalk to the main building entrance for each parcel. 7. Location and conceptual design of transit stops and related pedestrian facilities shall be provided and shall be subject to Design Review Committee review and apprivat, 8. The conceptual design of the "Gateway", a symbolic entry Avestatement, shall ded to 4th Street and Milliken nue; and smaller escale�project entry statement shall be emulated at 6th Street and Milliken,, 6th Street and Pittsburgh, and 4th Street & Pittsburgh, ` Resolution No. Olt 86-09 June 25, 19b Page 3 9 The Uniform Sidra Program for the entire Master Plan shall r be provided tiEald subject to City Planner rQvi2w `and` 6, approval. 10. Pedestrian .'plazas or courtyards shall be provided immediately adjacent to Zr near the perimeter greenbelt to Promote. the proposed "caitpus-Titre setting". These 'arda� . shall be designed as focal points., 'Intevior plazas,�or' courtyards; when proposed, shall be. secondary to the s plazas or courtyards adjacent to or near ,:the perimeter g eenbelt. ,r _ 11. ''ArchiteJtural design guidelines shall be developed and should incorporate the following criteria: a• AnFhitecturat planes shall have variatign in depth and 14"Ble to Create variety and interest m-the basic form " and, silhpjAette of thi building. +, Articulation of the el'evetion surfaces is encour,gec! through the ese of openings and recesses which create. texture •and shadow patterns and provide variety in the building plane or surface. C. Building entrances shall be. well articulated and project a formal entry statement through a variation of architectural planes, pavement surface treatment, and landscape plazas. d. Accent treatmait such as cnannes ir. exterior materials and texture is encouraged ilk conjunction with variation in the major form giving elements of a structure. 12. A statement through the use of landscaping shall be made to provide a visual connection between the north and south side of 5th,Street subject to City Planner approval. 13.. Full material samples and color s+iali 'be provided far individual development of each parcel. . a 14. The Master Plan text and/or the CC & R's for Parcel Map 9896 shall be developed to incorporate Cond'tions A-1 through A-13 and submitted for Planning Commission review and approval prior to recordation of Parcel Map 9896 or issuance of building permits for Phase X development, whichever comes First. Resolution No. 86- DR 86-09 a June 25, 1986 Page 4 i Cx B. Phas L:,. 1. A-Uniform Sign Program for the Maste"r 'Plan and Phase 1 development shall be provided and submitted for revi,�,,+; and 'approval prior to issuance of building 'permitr; 2. Detailed plans for the symbolic t°8ateway" entry statement ' 3nclucW191 landscaping theme shall :be submitted to Design Revie&Committee for<review and approval prior to issuance Of building per rbits'.- 3. The 1st s �. . ervice roll up doors shall be moved closer to the middle of the rear elevation for buildings w7thin parcel 8 (east elevation) and within parcel 7 (north ele4+atiorj. R. Detailed plans for public transit facilities such as bus strop, and other .street furniture, shall bessubmitted for Design Rev;,ewCommittee review and approval prior to Issuance or'build ag.-nermits. 5. A final acoustical report to reduce the exteri)r noise per the City requirements for lunch cGurts shall be suhmit`ted f9r review and approval prior tc issuance(fof building permits for Phase 1. ; 6. Detailed; landscape and irrigation plan for the perimeter landscaping theme for the entira Master Plan shall be submitted for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits for;Phase I. 7. A continuous hedgerow to screen parking area that fronts on 5th Street and Pittsburgh Avenue shall be-provided._ 8. Undulating mounding shall be provided along 5th Street. ~ 9. All texturized Pedestriai connections shall be of brick havers, exposed aggregate, �r a combin%Lt on of them, subject to City Planner approval, Samples shall be subm5tted for review and approval prior to issuance of building permit. 10. All screening shall be areoitecturaily integrated with the building design and where possible a roof shall be used to screen roof-mounts equipments.Parapet Wall screen is needed, it shall be of ail archi wectural ly designed nnclosure which exhibits a permanent nature With Ash the building design. Full material sample of such roof screen shall be submitted for MY Manner approval prior - to issuance of building permits, Resolution No. 86-9( DR 36-05 June 25, 1986 Page 5 ENGINEERING DIVIISIOt7 The entire width of 5th Street, ,from Milliken Avenue' to Pittsburgh. Avenue, shall be improvad. 2. The parcel map relating. to the Master Plan shall be recorded prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Private drainage easement for cross lot drainage shall be delineated on the parcel map, or provided by CC & R's'. CC & Rs shall be approved by the City Attorney and recorded concurrently with the parcel"map: I 4._ Slope easement for l'ot;.,jrading shall be delineated an the f` parcel map. 5. Vehicular egress and ingress rights shall be dedicated to the City on the following streets: Milliken Avenues r except for openings as shown on the tentativu'parcel map 'r and the entire frontage on kth Street and 6th Street. a, 6. Easement for shared access shall be provided nnd be recorded with the parcel map. i APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF JUNE, 1986. P NINE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ! t, Cha Dennis ATTEST: ----�--`. - Rr Buller, Deputy Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the PlanningCom ; Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing m'ssion n as du y of regularly _ troduced a ning ti'on was duly and Passed, and adopted' by the Planning Commission of t e City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the planning Commission held , on the 25th day of June, 1386, by the following vote-to-wit; AYES: COMMISSIONERS: STOUT, BARKER, CHITIEA, McNIELy REMPEL NOES; CO'kWSSIUNERS: NONE ` ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE 2T 6=u Cq u_ G' Y u.NG PO.. E -••H� q_p OA f Lce L.bw �.p n P Yywec` n oY .. ,ncyvo a��.�u qt p yo a�4u ,^Y pM. Oc6eL n .N. Cr n r,O'q ou.EnA yy gTyO �04 r ✓.a C'fd PC N YJY �. gp N C L q gg Pi Tc�un c v N o,Yo Yyo a no ua v u c c "� «o� L� PE.0 N.�yO SL�r E gCgN •+ d.. ...3 O. q Y..O _Vl:gU q. Y �..s.YnO Ovn 9�N t!„� to OaY ��.'Y.2 noyY LY,� yam. ..O L •„>. C.O.N Cl. V:O O_ N Olr U d C pE 'tea Ny9 _^ E C^s'.�. U�Y Y GAY Y 40p 60 Y q�.� Mb Yq p.�..�i t�`� 'Oyq. �q 'aq O.N Pn R� C• a�i� �`S.G O~ `Sv OV iO�rN O qYd O'w> C •O.uN N�C.+J �qT� O Own .d p .q MCA Gt aY.s Y EN HOCYL.N Lp A .e T u C.Y"O nPV •O L VOi LO L. H Y ► Y L Y �� N .r. Y� ps . a•�=u p o.v i�'N .p zc- s-a�ci� c u:+r•. r,N.-S.L. Y .GO rL.GL ai.i d � m M Ca �` �^� u s acLN nsfiU w sE dpUC4 M N VY 6.V� C� 6 ..H =O r O�cY C. Z V C. u k q _ ZNEp � !ul o z qa z r ` ~ ti• a DP Odu�Y�CwO c p Y C WXt t N tc acrc Aa �p"'A.. L.r B.a w^, o 4.. r 6.q. +i $„...�. L.� pa.¢ a..- •.qg a-. '° bMb c. yb ��I aAUO .0 VYq dp p.-..40 VLq VDu+{.•+yy S q L tZ p, O� NAY OY 4 a E AN ti Z. 0 ga'Utl t4idM E fp Q�UgS C.ut N 4Qp d n E a{N T YY= a.L6 prE A.aN�� qV4 N�`O •Oi.� jJ .tip a n D N a b ^a.... v L c 'r t c5 o e n O gpec Y'c. u_d.D+q a vagk L `c Y ovi.=e.v•- 'qM bCw. yp.^ b ft- CL •NCO .. 4 '.'qR OE_>YL Sm Ep' u¢C.G . 'NNUeWa.e.a�•'a0u_. �UgfiaaN^ypN�u.VY.a- bi. Z'•amu5 tit! C c 'aq '•�n=w=AWn' LGNYL ^teV>y c.b.mCw..'sa -a Na Y oF^'D'u€Ep�•~-,i dcN> .`..rd'aT. yD u c ..Cc 2S c r. d ?' w 'a26c N O O' O t�{icS ✓ EY.I [�+ C S.Oy. VL A OIE CU.2 Or ON• n= qG `YL�.� L 6L.c alb aniU C AahT�DpL �4d` CO UC •'tip _ G �E 6 W.g r q 4 4:l a N 4 cYe Iz.b.. C C c C �O r.�� D 1 1• q �L YV`..�. �9 S.q -OILS • a C•AN�.um QS VOOA.y 0.2 L.L T.0 V O L 11 "a ati d.•u. wN N .eA LbN ri.='i. .'.. O��d aDT".^ N .,N' D.p.L yM @N H. ^L C Lr9EV }.b1 cc++�r. Ku3�R rN=H U LP Y4 VO rq pO�y9y L EO NO ipA Au = .O ro Mom. '� LC. qi Gr Cy W� C NWt LWC 4qL aN-- +4. NEO CE o'^V p.y TSu Ley LL c .C..jV Y4 .".W,xObV SAC L +V..p40w �u4 r u o... ` Lnn u 9. o' q•" `u .- i M. a A y E.Y A x R 9 o L b U i Y O V N q.d.V C yC09. ppj"`. qM E G'- �• -az Cpu =NF O ax. CN K:.H py; 6'VbOy. CE a O b x O .O. S V�Cb>L.�C G.' ! Ya H5 d q' Taa LOY. 'V° b0... T C Lb w.aN O L c ^nb., Jm C C d�� aro.0 p 5 y... f.0� C C >O w�Es c_ �.-a CN b1'.W as =Y E. u .0 q ...=a a ' Sb O d 4..L �Z Car Rq. n"Oy� CAE \.e - nlT'. •' � ,cLe YaYi nc _s WLp np 'NC V V a�q.0� OaC cyy SO O C Ab d•4p OYY qO.F it d OBEE FCA Gw� =CO�p Clpcj d`,,4aL — L. ..L.CS q Cyy�M.a. pOq W.pOpr U` �6^` wr.HO 1;+.•.rq OYD yU9 Y -•'•O adN USLS dd 4b lda.pn O.. O.�T. � ' 6agy Pit NM-KNG:A ti \ { ; ;� ea a az L ~ew Yo 4Nr0 reLL9 NMyc a e at a . L v O q O S b~ 7A— p NY • V.� cL,O Y M 4Aa N 4 C 4 V Y q .. O •u a A o U g L u y auo qul a a�i N m No�aq -a N _v NNat u p a x L 6 ¢L N CJZ~ OIL I Va "�u •'`e u.�^a,p o ; q Er ,,.yiy E OQ�.O L ryO t LC w~ CabS L4.' r NO Gc Or NN= O UCu �laq 4 Ox:rq� O dC� OIY _ y4.N� b C `b Y O N`— VA L L Z G V r a+ b ONE ^ N L yV 4y �H Mt pp ,jC L Zb N E tts 4 G J 41uyL by 6n a p v 2 aH / 'Ou Lp1 l0'�4 ggLu o,Wnn v .a4c 4L c.� 4 a i 11 / y Ny C c H w~G \Nr `.4 04 aI L�Yrt OI yb � .^` O V aN C pp C M 1 .L E¢ � r n Yn bCLanyH 4 ELLT Ot p Q ee 0-9 Y M -Eb N Ct G L ar r� .o-b n L Y C O N6 al�O E N 9b LyAs aC 1.qL Nb1=,2. b d 7 r yc o,Y gNg..N bLam' ��. a �.+�.oa � vZj C ^ Y YA 'c Y ry EE 066 4G^ cC C 4 n dY ..r b�� •.,6 L Yb L W "CMG F,gAn �a b « x> b b b L JL x� � ci .ems73 .aq °I rb. v. L v I ai F,.ie Lr.v Lq Eb �qbL ..mod y � — Y A u>Ly aNlO V`�N �UN Nq.l.r •p-m � N.i — c qW Y .�G..s. y.p n H u- ao b '�� a pa 4r beym 4c o.Nbv — n.a.H .c91.. yo,q7. ygnp N`ia+ea .pWY..L.c,\�.p.wp.-sdnH�. b 6 J W Cvd COC V VO >L� Nlr y q O^yj O { p L O n tiV L •V> Li�, S E 9 Cl d L G V eu ��. �6 E uu.�• haP � •�.o E:N �^�^ • o 0 v LO.T �Y Ob �EY. YL m wV L V ai p �` Z N�V A y•r tSp nE Nu+P- ,J"tip. _ 4� «OT uT. y µ�.yL• y.C..O - 4{ C t�ppN F. n Y G q�.n �4'�d„ C L s s.'v' .. •0 N�� uq �C� q Ofi G W V.0 C'� ~ �Nda �• m,- n oom Gp.^ 4�2 Olt C _� =��.aw C•nwY.V ,PSG Y4. �.0 oC wd C 1!^U 1Di EYE C �• .3 ^"P 6 V `G A.A ii p•.o P G'p.•w ^ �'a �1 ^C L o E YZE F Fed A� V V UONa N a` `p +•? C G N L Y. yL a�iL 2:tlA 04 E�..N O eV L EO # w GN . p q u N V u W ` S O S u p..oEd O' y N.`+«. Y OUN C 4�Vu O tly Tti OLGq N. q VVM i0 N n 6 L.�G LO N d p vj a LA iN L NO EaG LO uv Nn F�O� d u u> p VA ^« -u u L . Y f A4N 1-G u AV�A.L tea O E O�api L TJ.O.� Lc6W L > 6 Yp c>Y W 2 3 u _ _ 6 qO N•'�' y .4 n ..«Oo .p.Y Ey' �`. a•c ems, N'yn �.c w•c � v" _n .0 6t u V V d y •.. y Ao. 3, p Aa o� 3t P q •G^ �a G G G T A� ' D' ;-, Y O ~ ' a`. c L �.r c � ..O' V Y i A c c C '''Nc O L c 0 6 G V 2 u n� O 'G g y C n Y y L K L C.� • S dd My � d ..0.T 4 C Q•y. V 2H.• ��' LG dO O +p0 Q•49E, dD d V L} 'i i G� • w > o � El•A.. L 2 G E p� FP .F.• NS A j�.uY 4 V sa pq aA i OI C V Y � >•O,y 1TD � � . �� ++{{.... 11 rM V.• NN � jj� .J L.E.•^ < ijG 6.�c 4LL� Cttn U EO E L, E I LL e?1 M o.o b�`^c i oadsa Jwb LE u c � � C r Ro mpisp n v2 w a »_Zt b 0 {t N G g p a` L i0 l•T v' h T y Y Y �I w CdO. G C NqA _ UY1L ^Cp3 j L �' La U uE bq w2 �� vy •` d qN w�aa . CL O 4 aFjb L bi t Yy u% Tb E y V o. i. L y..• dxo p qb wL�'' Yc 1µ �'- ^ �y¢ �+aa j�.� r. N p1 q V .^ V •O��A.. a..E. `v w u!Y n L w 7:9 Go e ya �,.ra v 'c_. L c,.. y o ^ q,}11►{ c � �,tt' - q e �S EapE l} H L • 2 b '= d.,P...L ^90 V Oc y S NA Aw rn� p0. b= 6. tL C. i C`'r '1` L..O. ..d. } OP OM 1N'. U9 49. � LLD D.VC Ci-v O J t Ln GSA L.0 C 4 P•Y � V L L w q^ ZZ& a H L --j �N b m •+q` .. Y C 9• p �' G� Y' 01�•,,, j �$ D g z;z A C 6.4 �46 qY � QUO w Y q Y cbB. de *a� r Is Zc. pb M .si.'� ^ 4 •an�^N^^ n0 Y1`. 01 p q q` b C C T c CNi O N d 4z '•E `E ill-all ' q vty"p' %N q u(.av a w 4 MI •a L >z UO.^ d G Lr bM •y C. �Ey �L G ^ wo C '�O^LG M.Od1 «WI.L f. ` P. O1 NV yuP qD �C o f bq b q^C� �G o a 3H2t: C _ 6 GC dq Ld IS �q �� w.•.L Y s � �� N c .+ cTI a6 w �o haw N ou N`l d D �nQ bA eM da.Ci w. A PO +..L U N.YON� fa..L Opr�YV D. WNV WYV 76 t1?dT, <�. tO fAlV HO < q C' �000 OL �Ou Y U LLU44 Y ^ p< • w L:l.M V .0 S w C J y L 4p _ ' L . CZ Y U V:L C.Z �� Nty L dL ~CLGN p. ♦Y � N t L�. N O Y G C y 6 N N +• '4'/ 1LNeN „ 2 0.E N. v V14 yL<e..pr ~ V V +G .01 6r- '4 a �WC Q•� Y�44 tpT. u rtV ��La,' Y L i C by'e T aiv ocy. a .LiN 'aunt a •^-•�, �. 4NC �L 2 ;.- o n, u.Y a`gcfi- GL ono ..o m.� 4 u�ivla IN� � Ya{4. ,4peon.� yL.G 4�. YOM Cr0 5.` •pB� 4 d' C b W � ppO^1"Y aLO,w ul 6y N VY4 NN N,... NW. �[� ,CU. Y. '• �r L. cN. .r C �Vh w KL LVyLY! L� vG1b n� 4V N Y�Vy =4' N.^ 4B C Y t1 y. CC� u C CO -U M acF FVat:g �G tlLE. �y An'L'o Qw: gM •„f � « � -U•a G6 z W p.Y. tip. 4 V L. a •y r. G <G h G_ v C n •Yi' C =w F y' N u wa �� q it -Hi zz, N L to .-. � ceb vu"i .gym cE n^W G' 6\ W 2 L 4w.1`NG• <L Yam" h.y \ � L ,. vy; ® m � N 0 m � oqL y> N d u tj t t, Nr O '^ L C rn U L NO x u ^ Of y f.d y Y • w L Y^ w�Y 0 , d� G� • C ^Y. L Gd gal CSI E w2N L ' La . 6. C9w a.•. 7 C O C O -R B.0 1-.�.. L w Y C`\`I \ 6•I to a a a L- uY T,r. L 2 = u L L a EL N.•. � .-. 4 LY d p o4 dL y� L N L d Q ea Soq E� Y ` o u qm o f u Na C u a'.0 ` _'• c o.L.N n `w yN v Qoq y yw. a Q.P V r a�L �a O�OI � d�a cW OW LL C^ y O. LyE OV. YdC .� aN,• 2z; Y AMi I ' n MASTER PLAN J DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR B:XBY BUSINESS PARK AT RANCHO CUCAMONGAAOL ' } Prepared For: Bixby Business Park C/O Bixby Ranch Company _ 911 Studebaker Road 11•E �EfVEp Long Beach, CA 90815 £TiY'bF`f2ANCHo CUCAMONGA 'PLANNING DIVISWI I SEP'121986 Prepared By: . 8t�ii0�lll�t�.1213�4�516 `°' Leason Pomeroy Associates Architecture, Planning, Interior Design -.� s y __ TABLE OF CONTENTS BIXBY BUSINESS PARK`-MIGN'GUIDELINES Purpose 1.0 Introductiono Pfixhy Business Park 1.1 Location 1.2 Planninq,and zoning 7..0 Approvals and Submittals 2.1 Plan Review Process 2.2 Preliminary Plan Submitt 2.3 Construction Document Sub iittal 2.4 Submittal for Bixby Business Park Development Committee Review of Any Alternation, Addition or,Change of use 2,;5 Order of Review Process as Outlined 3.0 Site Planning Guidelines 3.1 Building Site Coverage 3.2 Landscape Coveraqe 3.3 Ruildinq Heights 3.4 Street Setback 3.5 Interior Property Line Setback 3.6 Parking Requirements 3.7 Access and Drive Location 3.8 Storage, Service and Loading Areas 3.9 Refuse Collection Areas 3.10 Screening of £aterior Mechanical I' 1 Equipment _ 3.11 `racr eening of Exterior Electrical u a Equipment and Transformers 3.12 Fences and Walls rl 3.13 Utilities 1Ifnd Communication Devices ) j t 3.14 Grading 3.15 "Nuisance 4.0 Architectural Guidelines 5.0 Landscape Guidelines 5.1 IntrodOction to the Bixby Business Park Uodscepe'Concept 5.2 Landsc pe Design Guidelines 1 6.0 Signage Guidelines 6.1 Tenant Identification and Directory ,. Manum�nts 6.2 Wall Signage 6.3 Addre5s, Numbers 64 Us,^r Signage 6:5 0+, Site Vehicular Traffic Signs 7.0 Lighting Guidelines 8.0 Appendix t - Contact and Reference List i - Declaration of Covenants Conditions and _ Restrictions - Approved Color Palette L D.J. � -' Al --�;Zn .fi r i E 4 PURPOSE 3 The development of each site within Bir,by Business Park is controiled and restricted by Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for Bixby Business Park (hereinatter referred to as the "CC&R's"), as well as applicable governmental codes and regulations. The CC&R's are directed towav=t4 achieving the desired character and quality level of site development that will set Bixby Business Park apart from other buss ness developments. The purpose of the Oe;:win Guidelines is to further define the requirements which are specifically and generally stated in the CC&R's. These Guidelines are intended to supplement the CC&R's as F,n aid in the su'.1nittal of plans for approval by providing more detailed information;on which to base a review. Any specific conflict between CC&R's, Design Guidelines, and governmental codes and regulations, shall be governed by the more restrictive regulations. In" general, however, the priority of compliance is first with the Specific Plan and governmental codes and regulations, second with the CC&R's, and third with the Master Plan and Design Guidelines. II The owners or lessees of each site within Bixby Business Park should familiarize themselves with the _ intent and requirements of the CC&R's, these Guide- lines, the Specific Plan and all applicable govern, mental codes and regulations, and through their architects, implement all those provisions appli- cable to their specific site developments, All development plans, landscaping and gradhic designs, shall be submitted to Bixby. '.-Business Parke " Development Committee, hereinafter referred to as BBP Development Corvfittee, as described in the ' CC&R`s. The Bixby Business Park Guidelines are in no way intended to supercede any applicable Statutes, } Codes, Ordinances or regulations of controlling, governmental jurisdictions. Shouid any portions !.r , the Bixby Business Park CC&R's or Design uuIdefiir'.:'es be discovered to encourage vlolatiO of tiNHrica,. le Statutes. Codes, Ordinances, or other governmentk:� regulations, those discrepancies s quld be brounh , to the attention of Bixby Business r-ark Association. tt y , T i 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION TO BIXBY BUSINESS PARK The 35 acre Rixhv Rusiness park is being developad as the result of several years of research ;and analysis of the Inland ~moire in general and Rancho Cucamonga, now the fastest arowinq community in the country, and the aateway.. to the Inland Empire., Located at one of the main entries to that gatewav, 3 the development is being created with that image_-An mind; a carefully planned and maintained community o' attractive, freestanding, individual, light z industrial buildings in a parklike,, pedestrian riented setting, all 'unified by these design guide lines. 1,1 LOCATIONc The Bixby Rusiness Park is located in the southeast sector of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. It is bordered by Sixth Street on the north, Fourth Street on the south, in the west by Milliken Avenue and on the east by Pittsburgh Avenue. It is bisected by Fifth Street running east-west. 1.2 PLANNING .AND 7.nNINGc The—Industrial FPark._Q3t_trjct,' ub4rea ;Z industrial a„Specific Tan f "he.x,ci�tYti q � j ncho Cucamonga''and_;Tentative Parcel.,•Map _gs9fi govern planning and zoning of this development and are made a part of these guidelines by reference. DESIGN GUIOF,LINES PAGE' - 1 hPIA PROJECT NO. 85D55.11 r k - �Y J1 j 2.0 APPROVALS & SUBMITTALS y 2.1 PLAN REVIEW PROCESS:, 3 ,a In order to insure that the design standards for Bixby Business Park contained in these guidelines i are achieved, a series of plan submissions will be required at different 'stages of the design process. The number of plan submissions will vary depending ?, upon the complexity and timing of a proposed devel- opment. Man submissions will also be required for significant revisions, alterations, additions, or change of use for approved or existing developments within Bixby Business Park. In addition to the review by Bixby Business Park Development Committee required herein, before any development may be undertaken or any building pbrmit issued for a site within Bixby Business Park, a Development Plan shall also be submitted to and approved by the City of Rancho 'Cucamonga Planning Director. However, Bixby Business Park-Development Committee..shall approve the plan prior to sub..1tta1 to the City for Preliminary Review. Required plan submissions shall be submitted to the j Bixby Business Park Design Review Committee, care of Bixby Ranch Company, general partner.. Each stage of - plan submission will require three (3) sets of plans "' 1 containing the spec'rric information described below. The plan submission fer each new development and each significant r•eeision, alteration or change of use shall be accompanied by a Review Fee. DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE - 2 LPA1 PROJECT NO. 85055.11 The Rixbv Rusiness Park Develoomerit Committee will be established by Bixby 9usiness Parki B4 and of Directors to review all-revuireei plan sabm'issions. ` A,] submitted plans will be re�i ewesi bv';the Ri xbv Business Park Development ,,Co��Lthe fiir accept- ability of design in compliance W4th therCC&R`s and shese desion guidelines. noon" comaletion of review by the Committee, are set of`suhmittgd�plans wi11 be returned to the applicant aluna w•i�th a letter ° summarizing comments, recommendations, ,requirements ' and findinas. The length of review W-`,the Bixby Business Hark Development Committee for all stages ' of plan submission shall be governed by the,CCAR°s. The returned plans will be marked 'Not Approved" or "Approved° with the fo lowina intended me4ninas: i 1. Approved .r Anprove3 documents permit the applicant to proceed to the next stage of the approval process. In most cases, this will he City i Design Review Preliminary Submittal. 2. Aonroved.Subdect to Conditions Documents so marked permit the applicant to proceed to the next stage 'of the approval process provided the applicant complies with the conditions specified by the Design Review Committee. If the applicant takes exception to L• the specified conditions, the applicant must do so in writino by certified mail addressed to Bixby Business Park, c/o Bixby Ranch Company, within ten (10) days from 'the date of the applicant's receipt of returned documents. Unless su•:h action is taken, Bixby Business Park will assume that all conditions are acceptable to and approved by the applicant, 3. Not Approved Documents will be returned to the applicant with comments describing basis for disapproval. Revised documents must be resubmitted if an- proval is sought. DESIGN GuInELINES PAGE - 3 LPA PROJECT NO. 85055.11 Approval of the applicant's plans, specifications, calculations, or woi-k shall not constitute an impli- cation, representation, "or certification',by Bixby Business Park Association that-•the' above items are in compliance with the aoplif �le Statutes, Codes, 7 Ordinances or other'regulation,j. (T The applicant shall have the sole responsibility for the compliance with applicable Statutes, Codes, 1 Ordinances or other regulations for all work S perfo,ned on the premises by or on behalf of the applicant. 2.2 BIXBY BUSINESS PARK PRELIMINARY PLAN_SUBMITTAL: .. T t The Preliminary,Plan submission is regvired to con- vey specific information about the site olanninq and architecture of the proposed development. TPse Preliminary Plan package should be;submitted to the Bixbv Rusines park Development Committee prior to " or icurrent with suhmissiory of plans to the City „"` 3 of dncho Cucamonga. Preliminary Plans are to be submitted and approved before••construction documents are submitted. It is suggested .that a schematic -� {< plan of proposed project be reviewed by the City [ Pianninq neoartment prior to preparation of "Prelim- inary Plans" to be submitted to Bixby Business Park Development Committee. The Preliminary Plan suhmission requires each of the followira exhibits: 1. Site Plan Indicating the Followinq: - A. Building footprints and dimensions 'to pro- perty lines. _ B. Building roof overhangs. C. Configuration of parking and vehicular cir- culation areas. D. Location of parkino electroliers, E. Truck service; goading area, trash. enclo- .. ,• , j ! sures. F. Lines of setbacks and easements. DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE 4 LPA PROJECT NO. 85055.11 f Py G. Locations of on-site transformers and gas M meters. i \l H. Adjacent roadways including curblines, medians and median openings. I. A material and color sample buard. J. Tabulation of; 1. Parcel area. 2. Total building floor area_ 3. Site coverage. 4. Building coverage. l 5. Total parking provided. 6. Tota? parking required. 7. Estimated total employees on site at any peak time. 8. The anticipated nurnber of shifts and the hours and days of their operation. jj 2. Conceptual Grading & Drainage Plan Indicating: 1 A. Proposed finish grades, slopes and building pad elevations. 8. Site drainage structures and systems. , C. Grades of existing streets and curbs. D. Locations of street lighting and utility structures within landscape easement. 3. Conceptual Landscape Plan Indicating: A. Plant mat,�xials, sizes, and spacings. B. Walkways and paved areas. C. Other landscape design features. DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE 5 D 1 PROJECT NO. 85055.11 C s E0. � 4. Building ''Elevations of all Sides of `all K' Proposed Buildings Indicating; ` �c A. Wall and roof materials, textures and colors, B. Locations of wall mounted signing :and - lighting conforming to design criterial guidelines and the City Sign Ordinance, G, Roof and parapet heights above ground floor K. line. 4. The profile of 'any roof mounted mechanical e9yipment, which extends above the roof r eapet. 5. Building Floor Plans, h o. Building Roof Plans Indicating: A. Roof elevations above finish floor. _ B. Heights and locations of roof mounted meclr= anical equipment where available. 7. Outline Specifications of all building mater- ials. 8. Conceptual Graphics and Wall Mounted Signs: A. Ground signs and wail mounted signs: 1.. Locations. 2. Desiqns, materials, textures, colors, heig,,}s, areas: { 3. Illum, M)n. �L 4. Typograahy. B. Directional and informational signs; 1. Locations. 2. Designs, materials, textures, colors, heights, areas. DESIGN GUIDELINES ;. PAGE - 6 LPA PROJECT NO. 85055.11 D.1 � I 3. Illumination; 4. Typography. B. Directional and informational signs: 1. Locations. 2. `�Nsigns, materials, textures, colors, Heights, areas. 3. Illumination. r 4. Typography. -2.3 BIXBY BUSINESS PARK :ONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT SUB- MITTAL• All applicants are required to submit to the Bixby Business Park Developmpnt Committee copies of the same construction documents to be approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, in order to demonstrate Lhe precise construction details for implementing i the approved Preliminary Plans. The consteuction document submission requires three (3) sets of the following: 1. Final Grading and Drainage Plan. 1- 2. Architectural, structural, mechanical, plumb- ing, and electrical drawings. 3. Construction Specifications. 4. Landscape Planting and.Irrigation plans. r 2.4 SUBMITTAL FOR BIXBY BUSINESS PARK DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REVIEW OF ANY ALTERATION, ADDITION OR CHANGE OF USE In general this procedure is the same as outlined above for initial development projects. Prelim- inary plans are required to be submitted for any significant -revisions, alterations,. additions or change of use to approved or existing developments within Bixby Business Park. Preliminary plans for this purpose must be submitted and approved before DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE - 7 L LDPA PROJECT NO. 85055.11 ,A, , they are submitted for CWIy Design Review before construction documents are submitted to the City or r the Bixby Business Park Development Committee and 'Y before the commencement of Q�mstruction, Revision, Alterations, Additions or Change of Use require the i submission of three (3) sets of documents including: 1. A written description of the nature and extent i *. of the proposed revision, alteration, addition or change of use to be undertaken. 2. Indication of proposed revisions, alterations, additions or changes to: A. The site plan. T #' B. The grading and drainage plan. a C. The landscape plan. D. The building elevations including: 1. Wall and roof materials, teXtures and colors. 2. Locations of wall mounted signing ann lighting. 3. Roof and parapet heights above the ground floor line. The profile of any roof mounted mechan- ical equipment which extends above the roof parapet, E. The building floor plans. 3. Tabulation Of: LA. The new total building floor area. B. The new site coverage. LC. The new building coverage. _ D. The new parking provided, E. Calculations demonstrating the new required parking. _ DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE,!- 8 iPA PROJECT NO, 85055.11 0.1 ram-3t .. .. . F. The new estimated peak employment count. 4, Outline Specifications of construction mater- ials, 5. All applicants are reauired to submit copies of i the same construction documents`=to be approved by the- City of Rancho Cucamonga building officials, . in .order to demonstrate precise construction details for implemen4inq approved preliminary plans. The construction document submission requires three (3) sets of the followinq; A. Final grading and drainaae Plan. S. Architectural, "s�ructural, mechanical, plumbinq, and 6ectri';al drawings. i C. Construction specifications. j D. tan&,�ane plantinq and irrigpt on plans. s 2.5 ORDER OF REVIEW PROCESSES OUTLINED. In the course of designing proposed developments for lots within Rixby Business Park addition-0 ret_; _ - and approvals wilx be required beyond the Ri.cby 1 Business Park Develonment Committee revievi process. The followinq ,um,)iary `^£• Bixby Rusiness Park and other review anr-' approval-'processes is included to assist individual applicants in understanding the approximate nature and sequence of those reviews. An understam,: ng of the total review process from I' the outset, it is hoped, will contribute to smoother and more efficient processing of each propose( development. 1. The design process should begin with a rev•,ew- of the Rixby Business Park CCVV s and Desiqn Guidelines, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Av+de� ' cs+ and the applicable section t y current City of Rancho Cucamonga /utElr}7rd n `;-Copies of the City of Rancho Cucamoncfa — analications and submission reouirements should also he obtained from the city Planninu J)evartment at his time. DESIGN GUIDELINES pArr _ ll LPA PROJECT NO. 85055.11 2. Pr7ar tt,` ommenc ment of design, a qualified �v civil engineer should be consulted as to i grading and drainage restrictions in the area. i . Any proposed subdi:�,siun or phased development } will require ar. apgroved master Plan.. Appli- cants should review master glares• with the. City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Depaftment several weeks prior to intended submittal for City Site Development Review. Site Development Review With staff is required by the Specifi-, Plan.. 4, Master plan should be submitted to and approved by the Bixby Business Park Design Development Commi ttoe. 5. Master plans shouie' be revi+wed by a ualified civil engineer for compliant�", with grading and drainage restrictions. J , 6. Preliminary plans shall be submitted and approved by the Bixby Business Park Development i Committee review and approval prior to submit- tal to the City for Site Development Review. 7. Submit plans tr'the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Site Development Review, Site Development Review is the only Planning ,department review i and approval pror.,ess regalred prior to submis- sion for bu lding department plar? iheck, unless the proposer!-derelupment require iqea `S PEijtt� Use Permit ` a;;subdivi'sion mad ltir"'U 3 Y..:V SO their own. proceCs��u�- bereirx,, , 'Velopment "`ev-6,; covers,'site planning, .arv. Mural `concept Af andscape, and conceptual y.-gra.dii y`A" 'drainage design review, :k. p :RE1cfi , cc�Clont�s S. Submit plans for City Building Department plan check, - . . 9, Submit building cepartment approved construc- tion documents to Bixby Business Park Design ''•eview Committee for final approval, 10. Obtain building and/or grading and/or City encroachment permits and proceed with construction. DESIGN GUIDELiNE5 PAGE 20 LPA PROJECT NO. 85055.11 D,1 s 1 "9 F 1. J ' 1 c 3.0 SITE PLANNING GUT,"OELINES ;s 3.1 BUILDING SITE COVERAGE: ' Objectives 1. To insure that the intensity of site develop- ment is not excessive or detrimental to the perception of Bixby Business Park as a unified ' campus. ti. 2. To insure that the intensity of site develop- ment does not overtax utility, transportation systems, or on-site parking areas. 3. To promote an integrated pedestrian oriented industrial/office park development in a campus- like setting';!; -� Guidelines ' 1. Site Coverage (defined as the building-ground contact area divided by the total net lot area) `'-- -' - shall not exceed 50% or the..coverage specified _ by the City of Rancho Cucamonga (whichever is more restrictive). 2. In most cases, buildings shall be located and p y oriented so that -their entrances. are visible i from the street on which they front. lne ` approach frun the street to the building may be f DESIGN GUIDELINES _ PAGE 11 LPA PROJECT NO. 85055.11 D.1 ' formal or informal, but should serve to announce and rei a the building in its relationshi p he treet. A plaza and/or entry stet all cali attention to each free-standing building. 3. To the greatest extent possible, the planning of any individual site shall take into consid- eration the existing improvements on adjacent sites and relate open spaces, structure and plaiting ,so as to make the improvements on each site mutually reinforcing., A. Truck loading areas^shail be screened from view r from all streets and from adjacent properties. F t 5. Site planning shall incluue the master planning of any expansion or additional development 4 whi& is contemplated on the same or adjacent fJ property. 3.2 LANDSCAPE COVERAGE Obj ctive,, 1. To insure that at least a minimum portion of a development site is devoted to landscape mater- ials in order to maintain a sense of continuity i with adjacent sites and to contribute to the t perception of Bixby Business Park as a "park like" environment. 2. To insure that at least a minima of .landscape materials are available on a development site in order to contribute to the environmental well being of potential users of each;site. r 3. _'To enhance the visual quality of the of the streetscape and to provide an 'attractive and plecsant working environment in a "campus-like" • • setting. Guidelines 1. A minimum of at- least 15% of the area within the property lines of a development site shall be devoted to landscape materials unless other- wise approved in writing by the City of Rancho Cucamonga (for additional landscape require- ments, see Landscape Guidelines Section-5.0)'. DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE 12 .. IF LLPA PROJECT NO, 85055.11 6.1 _3 T l 1, 3.3 BUIi )ING HEIGHTS: Objectives 1. To maintaina reasonably consistent and compat- ible height profile throughout. Bixby Business Park. " Guidelines TWO sTOFIY 1. Building heights shall be determined by the average distance, measured at equal intervals around the building perimeter, from final grade five feet from the building line to the top of parapet or mid-point between eave and ridge. N L ' 2. A single-story building shall be no higher than ONE STORY 26 feet in height; a two-story building shall be no higher than 37 feet in height including { mechanical equipment screen. `i 3-4 STREET SETBACK: _ S Objectives 0 1. Toachieve a feeling of openness along the as PJ DG SETBACK LINE f 7treets that reinforces the perception of Bixby w m MIN' LANDSCAPE SETBACK YARD Business Park as a campus environment. D a —{- ai U 10':MIN W ¢ > 2. To encourage some regularity of spac W'MAX e formed by 2 W buildings throughout Bixby Business ParkasLU Y y I ' 3. To achieve a landscaped .setting between the s.Teet and buildings. . ps■y, Guidelines _ 110.MIN n 4 1. The building setback shall Le measured from the -" OF MIN ultimate street curb to the closest point on io'MAx the building, excluding architectural features FIFTH STREEIT or screen walls. This distance shall be a, minimum of 45 feet 'along Milliken Avenue, NOTE'YARD'WIDTH VARIED TO MAINTAIN Fourth Street and Sixth Street,. and a minimum MINIMUM REOUIRED AVERAGE WIDTkt of 25 •feet along`Pittsburg Avenue and Fifth -Street ' c�1C'�I� 4l►'l sT� r cdm € DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE - 13 L LPA PROJECT NO. 85055.11 0.1 3.S . 2. There will be estbiished a landscape setback ; (yard) along each street frontage. It shall be v measured front the ultimate street curb to tho building face and/or any pro imate parking lof curbs. It shall have an average r4idth of 4a j feet along Milliken Avenue,-Fourth Street .:arid Sixth Streets, and 25, along Pittsburg Avvenue and fifth Street. Par�fng may encroach into the buildi.ig setback as mucF:%as 10 feet as long as the average width of W;'yard remains above the required minimum. 3. "Campus-like setting" for the master plan shall be emphasized by,providing landscape and hard- scape along at least one entire street frontage per parcel and by varying the landscape and buildi'ag setback beyond the minimum average 45 feet for Milliken Avenue, Fourth Street, Sixth Street, and minimum average 25 feet for ! Pittsburgh Avenue and: fifth Street. �.' 3,5 INTERIOR PROPERTY LINE SETBACK: Objectives 1. To provide a definite physical separation (' between buildings on adjoining pots suitable U Ca for distinguishing separation of responsibili- �� ties. t�-=� Z 2. To allow curnpanies on adjoining 'lots to be w � individually identifiable. CL Guidelines cc a 1. 0o parking, shall be permitted to be construe ; ted closer than five ri feet from an interior proprtwriting Business Parky by line, unlessapproved in Devei4pment Review Ccmmittee. 2. All setbacks areas shall be fully landscaped in ... .,: ' a manner both compatible with and complimentary � to the on-site architecture and ' landscape �. design concepts. 3. No buildings shall be built.within 14 feet of'' any interior property 1',ies, unless otherwise approved in writing by Bixby Business Park Development Review Committee. DESIGN u..iQELINES PAGE 1;4 LPA PROJECT NO. 85055.11 O.1 on wl .' 3.6 PARKINS REOUIREMENTSs Objectives I. To pw +ide sufficient on-site oarkno to accom modat.? all vehicles associated with the use of r. k, each lot at any one-time, Parking on oublic „ roadways or on lots of other drejects is,_pro hibited. P. To configure parkino areas such that they con- ` tribute to an increase of the ratio of on-site persons to 'on-site vehicles. Guidelines 1. A11 uses located in Bixby Rusiness Park s15alI provide on-s:te_parkinq and loading facilities in accordancF, with the followino_ scheduAe, provided that notwithstanding the schedule, w every use sh417i'.provide sufficient off-street parking so that°,-no worker, owner, visitor, or other person connected with the establishment shall be required to park on the street. r: A. Offices and Retail uses: { i One space per 250 square feet of gross floor area. R. Manufacturing research, ervice, Construc- tion. u . fCi•} i One space oer 1.5 employees, but in no case less than two snares per 1,000 square feet f of gross floor area. C. Warehouse and Distribution Industry: Y k{ ;} One space ner 500 square feet. R, Mw;:*=-use tenant where office use does not exceed 35 of building area. One space per 400 Square feet. -5/wr-/ DESIGN GUIDELINES kP� PROJECT NO. 85055.11 PAGE - 15 h 2. Standard p� t stall s'shal1 be a minimum of qAft _ feet by 19�t with I foot overhang. Permit ted over landscape area only.. Compact parkinq 1 stalls shall be a minimum of 8 feet by 16 fe'et. , The minimum backup aisle is 26 feet.' 3. In addition to the oarkinq reouired above, one desionated Parkinq space shall be Provided for each comoanv vehi3Oe to he Parked on-site during normal workinq hours. Parking spaces for comoany vehicles shalt be of a size, area, and configuration that company vehicles can be x parked such that they are fully contained within their designated spaces. 4. Designated "Handicao Parkinq" spaces shall be provided to meet State Handicap requirements. 5, Should a business locating within the Bixby a -Business Park development wish to encourage the formation of car Pools by their employees, con- sideration should be given to designating re- served "Car Pool" parkinq spaces. Designated x "Car-Pool parkinq spaces should h,,;aiven pre- ferential locations in relativel►s'elose;;proxi- mitt' to primary employee entrances, 6. Designated "Cycle Parkinq" areas should be considered0for the convenience of employees using bi ;cles or motorcycles. In order to avoid the clutter of Cycles parked in unplanned locations, it is recommended that Planned. "ry0e Parkinq" areas be conveniently located to ,employee entrances and be provided, with racks having security locking capabilities. 7. Parking areas shall be screened from view from - ' streets and adjacent property by landscaped berms. Parkinq areas shall be shaded and screened from overhead view by grove or orchard plantinq of specified shadf! trees to meet City of Rancho Cucamonga's cf'rrent specific Plan criteria at Solar Noon. DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE - 16 LPA PROJECT NO. 85056.11 0.1 3.7 Af:CESS AND DRIVE LOCATION: Objectives J - L1. To have access drives located such that vehcu- lar traffic arriving at and' leavinq from lots as well as traffic pass no continuously in C streets, flow at an optimum level of efficien- cv. 2. That the continuity of street-site land*capinq is minimally disrupted,by the construction of p' access drives. 3. That, utilities located on the landscape ;ease- ment are not or are minimally;,disrupted h 4, the :••.:• construction of access drivE Guidelines ............ ."... ..... 1. Access drives alonq Milliken Avenue, Pittsburgh Avenue and Fifth Street should be cooriiinated � ;1 with approved Master Plan access drives. 2. No access drives will be allowed on 5th or 4th Streets: 3. The development of common access drives is required within Bixby Rusiness Park to minimize the amount of curb cuts. Access drives should be coordinated with adjacent lots so as not to impede the efficient flow of peak period - traffic. 4. Access drive desiqns should incorporate orovi ") EMERGENCY access sions for efficient-vehicle stacking during Peak periods of use. i 5. Lots along Milliken Avenue with only one l- permitted access point will .be desioned to allow emergency access throuqh adioininq lot 24'MIN s OK-BOXED BARRIER and the adjoininq lot shall be desiqned to W1 PERMITTED ar FooTH1LL allow for such emergency access'. FIRE DISTRICT V�yT DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE' - 17C r 6 LPA PROJECT NO. 85055.11 - 0.1 3.8 SERVICE AND LOADING AREAS: Objectives 1. To insure that service and loading areas are r; not visible from primary visual exposure areas (streets, primary image entry drives, floors of BuF' � image buildings, common visual and recreational t'view amenity areas, etc.). 2. To insure that .service and loading areas are BUILDING located upon a site so as to .minimize the visi- bility of loading' a;til service vehicles from primary visual exposure,,real. 3. To insure that the serVke and 10'ading areas are designed and locatedt�rn the site so that service vehicle activities pd movement do not disrupt the efficient ''rruw of on-site and 4a off-site traffic. Guidelines (' "(f of 1. ThejIndustrial Specific"p;}an provides guide- lines fnr design of loading and service areas and should be referred to for this information. 2. Provisions shall be made on each site for any necessary vehicle loading and no on-street vehicle loading shall be permitted, 3.9 REFUSE COLLECTION AREAS; Objectives 1. To insure that refuse and refuse containers are not visible from primary visual exposure areas (streets, primary image entry drives, floors of image buildings, common visual and recreational amenity areas, etc. - 2. To insure that refuse enclosures are effective- ly designed to receive and contain v� erated refuse until collected, and enclose containers after refuse is collected. W DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE - 18 LPA PP,04ECT NO. 85055.11 D.1 3- .0 `insane ltat.,�fuse .�oll�ien vehicles -have clear -and"'convetat access to refuse col lec- tion areas and ;thereby not contribute to excessive wear-and-tear to on-site and off-site develoome'nts._ #r t Guidelines 1. All outdoor refuse containers shall be visually :c screened within :n durable 6'-0" or higher non- combustible enclosure, so as not to be visible from adjacent lots or sites, neiahborinq properties or streets. No rL-65e collection areas shall be nermitted between ;a street and the front of a buildi7nq. 2. Refuse co'tlection areas should he n ffect:vellr -desimed to_cmtain all _ ?;e Unnenerated vn- 3 :si#e . and Aeogsited between col l��vr�s- #1 Deposited refuse should no\\ be visible from c� ide+he refuse container; 3. Refuse collection enclosures.should<be les med of durable materials with finishes and colors which are unified and harmonious with the over- Ah all architectural theme. 4. Refuse collection areas should be so located unon the lot as to provide clear and convenient access to refuse collection vehicles and there- bv minimize wear-and-tear to on-site and off- site developments. S. Refuse collection areas should be -desicmed and Iocated nn .the lot so as to be convenient for :-the op—_tlisRi Uf refuse-generated 3.10 SCREMNG OF EXTERIOR MECNARIWL F�ZtRPMENT: Objectives L1. To have ail' exterior components of plumbinq, processinq, heatina, coolinq and ventilation systems not be directly visible from within the lot or from adloininq streets, lots, or build- inns. t1ESIGN GUIDELINES AAGE-- 19 LP3 PROJECT NO- 85OSS "7 f _ t . 1, 't, t Guidelines L '_-Extar•iur •-compormnts -of. -pinmbiatg, processing, t heating, cooling and ventilation systems 5AY E�attR (including but not limited to piping, tanks, f, stacks, collectors, heating, cooling and venti- lating equipment fans, blowers, ductwork, vents, liuvers, meters, compressors, motors, incinerators, ovens, etc.) shall not be permitted to. protrude above a plane level with ,,.. ti-e top of the parapet, unless otherwise = j approved' 'in wr{iting by Bixby Business Park Development Revi�evr Committee. Z. It is recommended that in the case of roof mounted mechanical equipment, that building, parapets be of such :a height that roof mounted r screening devices not be required. If building parapets do not ,provide the.required'screening, xhanical equipment shall be screened by an unobtrusive screening device that will appear as an integrated part of the overall architec- tural design. 3. Any devices employed to screen exterior compon- ents of plumbing, ,processing, heating, cooling and ventilating systems from direct view shall appear as an integrated part of the architec- tural design, and as such, be constructed of complimentary and durable materials and 3 finished in a complimentary texture and color scheme to the overall architectural design. 4. Any exterior components oT• plumbing, proces- sing, heating, cooling and ventilating systems- -nd .their screening devices, that will be visible from upper fl of zdjacent buildings _ shal l•be kept to .a visible-•m•i nimum, sbal1 to 'installed in a neat end compact fashion, and shall be painted a sole- as to allow their blending with their visual background. 5. No exterior components of plumbing, processing, heating, cooling, and ventilating systems shall be mounted on any building wall unless they are an integrated .architectural design feature,. and in any case shall be permitted only with the written approval ai Bixby Business Park Development Review Committee. DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE - 20 LPA PROJECT NO. 85055.11 D.2 ,, _ v I i 3.11 SCREENING OF EXTERIOR ELECTRICAL EOUIPMENT_ANtt -MANSIT TgFRS Objectives I. To eliminate the visibility of exterior electrical equioment and transformers from { Primary visual exposure areas (streets, primary imaqe entry drives, floors of image buildings, 3 and common visual and recreational amenity areas, etc. Guidelines ; 1. Transformers ansformers that may a area a"S sibl -be -frwn any primary bale screened with -vlantinq•and/or berms or a durahle non- -romhuttible -e-closure W a esirm Via.. 1 tion-zcceotable-to-'Southern Calffurnia Edison 2 Company). Where possible, it -is �r-ecommended that refuse containers and transformers be 3 integrated into the same enclosure. I 2. Transformer enclosures should *`oz designed of""' durable materials with finishes and co-,ors which are unified &A harmonious with the over- all architectural thane. 3. Electrical equipment shall be mounted,„r tie interior of a buildinq wherever possible. Wh4n interior mounting is not Practical, electrical equipment shall be mounted in a location where it is suhstantiallu screened from oublic.view. In no case shall exterior equipment he mounted on the streetside -or primary exposure side df any t-1-1ding. 4. Exterior mounted electrical equipment and conduit shall he kept to a visible minimum, where visible shall be installed in a neat and orderly fashion, and shall be Painted to blend with its mountinq background. DESIGN GUIDELINES DACE 91 6PZ PROJECT NO. 85055.11 _ ` 1.12 FENCES AND WALLS: Qbiectives X, TO permit tite instal'lativn of fences and walls within a lot for the ;purpose of site secuoity, sound attenuation, separation of functional activities, and screening of uttsightlY func- tions and activities. 2. To have fe-Xes and walls, installed such that they are as inconspicuous as possible or designed as an integrated and complimentary architectural design,element adding interest to the overall architectural design concept, + 3. To have no,, -falls or fences reduce the intended quality nfi the development or reduce tha,-; percept=inn' 'OF:3lislsY Busires,s~par as a c'amau . -environment. 4. To discour"e .the -construction of walls and } fences except as necessary;.tn' uree;t 'out-side storage, loadina, and service areas. S. To insure that fences and walls do not, becauss, of their height, location; or design, contri-' Bute to a decrease in the safety or efficiency of traffic flows on-site , or streets. in fronting Guidelines 1, No fence or wall shall be constructed within Setback from the-curb2line zf..;e`Tonting street, . except thpsa free-Itandinqor winq wails which :are ,in .approved part, of. the architectural desitm' of"the'buildings. CORRECT 2. Fences.. are to be constructed in a vertical rrnnnnntlnr�nn picket format to allow a sense of transparency through the development. An example is simple vertical picket wrought iron fencing. 3. Ho ornamental, chain link, or barbed wirzf7' WRONG -, fencing will be allowed. - 4. Fencing shall be of a substantially durable_ fireproof material. No wood fences will be WRONG permitted. DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE - 22 LAA FRQJECT Nn. $5055.17 j 3_1,3 UTILITIES AND COMMUNICATION DEVICES: r pbjetti"',Ps _ L To have the entire :B1xby Rusiners Park visually free of unsightly overhead power-,and telephone lines, utility poles, and other utility and communication equipment and components, 2. To protect of" site utility systems from becorr ing over-burdened by individual lot utility systems, 3. To achieve 'minimum disruption of off-site utilities, pzviTg, ,and, Iar#r4pe due*, t0li- struutivn 'aTd maintenante o 'On-Site utj-lity systems_ cuilel iyties 1.' All_rexZev iar,,-on-site dilities,-jrcj-aj i'4, tut not limited to, drainage systems, sewers, gas lines, water lines, and electrical faex� # transformers as addressed under Se&,ion 3.I1j, 1 telephone and co�tuunications wires and equip- ment shall be installed and maintained under- Ask 2. On-site underground utilities shall be designed and installed to minimize the disruption of off-site utilities, paving and landscape during - construction and maintenance and shall be of such a design so as not to place excessivm` burdens upon Off-site utility systems during the course of use. _. 3. No, antenna �w ,devise for transmission. or recep- tion -of any signals, including, but not limed to, telephor,--, television, and radio, shall_be placed on any lot so that it is visible ice ` — 51-0" above the ground or ground floor level it a distance of E00 feet in any direction,slab specific written approval is granted by Bixby Business Park Oevalopment Review Committee. Transmitters and. antennas .shall be screened from viers by berms:, planting,:'or a combination of both 4. Temporary overhead power and telephone facili- ties are permitted during construction, DESIGN GUIDELINES oABE_2 LPA PROJECT NO. 8505511 0.2 3.14 GRADING: Oblectiyes To encourage site desigrt' which build- ingsnrotects- and business activities from d?mage' or disruption that micrht otherwise occur during extreme storm conditions. a 2. To allow precipitation failinq on site and surface water flowind from adjacent sites to 3 be effectively absorbed or to. drain off the site without causing excessive water:Gp1tCe.t r K tions on adjacent sites or streets_ a 1 3. To have site gradinq compliment and reinforce the overall architectural and laridscane deslon zharacter. uidel-ines All work shall-tm 'dune Tn,•dcmrdwme with the city of Rancho Cucamonga standards and specifications, and Chapter 70 of the Onifor.a Buildinq Code, latest edition. AWAL 2. Protective measures $Fall be taken by the con- tractor so as not to cause any mud, silt, or f debris .n be deposited onto public or adjacent property at all times during construction. Any mud' or debris on i public property shai, be removed immediately. Oust shall he controlled by watering or other unproved method throunhout the grading and building construction operations. 3, 4-Pribr`"to the start of'any building construction the contractor shall furnish the city with certifications from the civil engineer and *» soils engineer that building pad subgrades are within 0.10 foot of the approved plans and that the proper compaction and preparation has been . obtained. 4. Responsibility for Grading and inspection shall Y - be assumed -by the"-engineers" of work in accordance with Section 7014 of the Uniform 8uildina Code; Agak DESIGN GUIDELINES PAG - !PA PROJECT NO. 85055..11 - F 24 i xY 5< The soils engineer shall also be resnonsible to verify and report that proper compaction has been obtained by 'subcontractors and agencies concerning utility line backfill including, but not limited to sewers, water`lines, electrical, gas, and landscape irrigation lines. 5. fln as-graded grading plan and certification of compliance with said grading plan is' to be submitted to the buildina and safety division.prior to release of gradinq bond and prior to final gradinq inspection. 7. All slopes exceeding 5' in :vertical,teight.nnd exceedino 5:1 slope 'are to be planted with 1 approved Plant'material aad oravided .wi=h �woroved;wateranp:system_ := R is xby. Rosiness 'Park -is located in a soil =-erosion 'control area as defined by San A Bernardino Code Section 810-01041.' A Soil Disturbance'-Permit is.:required-area shuulxi he obtained from the 7lgr cufltaral"'�department of San Rernardino County by `Cwtactinq Mr. Allan Smith at (714) 387-7_10$: 3..15 NU ISAN CE. Objectives jL 1. To insure that no portion of Bixby Business Park is used in such a manner as to create a nuisance to adjRcwt mites or streets sueh as, but not limited to, vibration, sound electro- T - mechanizal:disturbance, radiation, air or rater -P _ _ o"llution,-taast, Wiision of odorous, tokec or noxious matter. Guidelines I. No nuisance shall be permitted to exist or operate upon any lot or site so as to be offen- sive or detrimental to any adjacent lot or site or neighboring Property onto its occupants. A "nuisance" shall include, but not be limited to, any of the following conditions: DESIGN GUIDE LINES PAGE _ 25 L �P PROJECT NO. 85055,1,1 7 7 y A- Any use of the lot` or site which emits dust, sweepings, dirt or cinders into l the.atmosphere, or discharges liquid, solid ; ` wastes. Dr other ,harmful matter in the • opinion '.'Of � the ',Bixby Business`:' Park' Development Review Committee may, adversely` affect the health, safety, or comfort of IIG i , persons within the area or;the intended use of their property is prohibited. No waste nor any substance or materials of any kind' ' # strap be discharged into any public sewer serving the subject property or any part thereof in violation of any regulation of ' any public body having j-,wisdiction aver' such public.'sewer. B. The escape or di scbarge of any fumes, odars, gages;'vapors, steam, acids or other ub. sstance into the atmosphere which dis- 1" � •' .�, .�argev. dn.:�?• s�--inion;�sf:.� �by 'Business. .f 3 •..Park Devebpment Review..Crmmitt-ee, may be ' detriment al to the health, safety or wel are:,of:any person..Dr—may. #te fere with the comfort of persons within the area or j which may be harmful to property or vegeta tion. C. The radiation or discharge of intense glare or heat or atomic, electro-magnetic;:'micro- 7 wav_, utfrasonic, laser or other radiation., Any operation producing intense glare or, heat or such other radiation shall be per- formed only within an enclosed or screened area and then only in such manner that the glare, or hat or radiation emitted .will not,, - be discernible from any point exterior to the site or lot. upon which the operation is _ x.'rudaacteri. D. Excessive noise.- At no point outside of any lot plane shall the sound pressure level of any machine, device, or any capbi- nation of same, from any individual plant or operation, exceed the decibel levels in ' the designated preferred octave bands as follows. - DESIGN GUIDELINES PACE - 26 LPA PROJECT NO. 85055.11 D.:2 S Qctave Band Maximum Sound Levels.: a Center Pressure (db) at .� _•-;. r Frenuency of Lot Roundap';r P1ane 31.5 7R 63 72 1'r'5 65 250 54 500 55 i0C0 52 F 2000 ' 50 4000 4sl # 8000 47 3 A-scale levels of monitoring purposes are 3 equivalent to 60db(A) - The maximum permis -st noise levels for- the vctBve --bands shown�'abare are equal to an M-50 Noise �- Criterions carve.when plotted on the pre 3 fer-r�ed-frequency seal e. Reasonable noisy from -motor vehicles'--and 7 other -trarsunr atism ? lilies . are exempted, so long asthe vehicles or other transportatiop, facilities are not contin Aft uously on the'sub;ect property. The ooeration of signaling devices and other equipment havina impulsive or non- continuous sound characteristics shall have z the following corrections applied: Corrections ..;71?ure tone Content - 5db 3mpuisivem arac'ter 5db Duration for Yon-Continuous Sounds in Day- Time Only 1 min/hr + -5db 10 sec/10 min +10db -_ 2 sec/10 min' +15db The reference Leval for the db values listed above is the pressure of 0.00002 microbar or 0.00002 dyne/cm2. DESIGN GUIDELINES LPA PROJECT NO. 85055.11 PAGE - 27 D.2 d pw E. Excessive emissions of smoke, steam or - particulate matter. Visible emissions of smoke or'steam will not be permitted (out , side any building) which exceed Ringlemanr.: No. 1,;n the Rin1lemann Chart of the Uni .zd States Bureau of Mines. This requirpient ,. shall` also be applied to the :ef I trash and waste materik1s. _41ind-borne dust, sprays and mists originating in t plants are not permitted.' E. Ground vibration. Buildings and other • structures *�;shall be- L=stract-ed., -and machinery ane equipment-install-ed"aml insu- - fated or. each %l©t or"site sa: -that the T ground vibratioh inherently and recurrently a generated i not perceptible without a^-imstruments--zt 'any 'Qa77,it_•ext tir--to 8ny L = DESIGN GUIDELINES -^ - PAGE 28 113 PA PROJECT R.Q. 85055`.3.1 1 x., 3 _ 4.0 ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES n- �7ectves be one or two-tenant buildings with office, engineernq, manufacturing aruf_.assembly u.Ies, all of. .will- ., .ram s-ervite requirements. Building sizes will vary upward from 20,000 square feet. 2. To encourage high quality contemporary archi- tectural design. It is intended that all buildings will be desi6aed using simple farms organized around four design elements: Build- inq masses with pain}ed and textured finishes, free standing and integrated accent walls. pedestrian plazas and courtyards, and planted arbor/trellis structures. These elements will he designed into :a 1 future buildingdevelop- within-Bixkv 7Business Park, `-T. 'To encourage businesses locating within Bixby Business Park to express tl:auelves invididual ly through creative interpretation of these ,guidelines, while prese-ving the Master Plan design elements. Guidelines 1. All design shall aonear as an integrated part -� of an overall site design conceot. DESIGN GUIDELINES PACE- 29 hP� PROJECT NO. 85055.11 _ _. 2. No "Period Buildings" shall be permitted Contemporary building forms and materials will be encouraged. 3. Pre-engineered metal buildings will not be # permitted. a ^k. Metal clad buildings will be permitted only if designed by a�! architect and only if specifically approved in writing by Bixby Business Park 0celopment Review Committee. 5. Flat roofs shall be"designed so as not to be Ek j visible from adjacent streets and shall be finished 'with a l i�tsa-sulored ac39re9ai'e=ssufee compatible with 'th.9 exterior wail colors. 6. Ala roof mounted equipment shall be screened -#ram view by;parapets or, oi• er.bui;ding.forms. fientive glass'7sWall-'be-subject M mpprnual, by the Bixby 84siness Park 9evelopment Review Committee. Any reflective glass approved wi 11.beaoft::and-Tian•mi"ored glass. 8, All exterior lighting Shall be designed so that the light source is concealed. S. Exterior colors and finishes: ' A. Finishes shall be non-reflective; colors f shall be as approved by the. Bixby Business Park Develapment Review Committee, B. A palette of suggested color is included in this quid i7ie, ,j P 4,e"-4;`3 y A Y+ IDl .3)esign roasiderAiD&should be given n to- A. Views and vistas, both from within the building and from off-site. 8. Solar orientation and climate. C. Orientation toward major streets and thor•- oughfares. D. Vehicular and pedestrian flows, V. DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE - 30 LPA PROJECT NO. 85055.11 D.2 _ E. The character of surrounding developments. r' },. F. Expressions of a facility's functional or- �* � ,: _ ganization. �• , G. Expressions of the indi`virival zhararter of " each business. K The satisfaction of physical', psychologi- cal, social, and functional need's of facility users. I. Energy conservation th nngh facility de- sign. J. Potential envirD mental hazards. .. K_' 'Enhancement .of-.the overall landscape mas- s r `r ! .:"tQrplan. i `1.. 3tarrF•�expnsut P. 11. Consideration shall to given to the incorpora l tion of the ..fnl]oaring ha#ettunal .-design features: A. Architectural planes and "Theme Walls" y shall have a variation in depth and angle to create variety and interest to the basic form and silhouette of the bui l di nq. 3 B. Planted arbor or trellis elements should Le incorporated into each overall design . n•` " - concept to better integrate the buildings into the landscape and recall the vineyard 7 context of the site. j C. ;Articulation of the oilding surfaces is encouraged through the -use of openings and recesses creating texture and shadow pat- terns and providing visual interest to the overall building farm. D. Buiiding entrances shall be well articu- lated and project a formal entry statement through -a variation of building form, de- _ corative pedestrian plazas, accent land scaping and water features. DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE 31 LPA PROJECT N0. 85055.11 0.2 r� Y MA E. fomolimentiny colors, materials and textures in conjunction with dynamic building forms is encouraaed as accent treatment. See attached anpendix foo approved_color palette: F. :nriched visitor parking areas adjacent to main buiidinq entrances is encouraged as well as highlighted outdoor employee lunch a-cas. G. Ruiidinq atriums and interior courtyards should be incorporated into buildi6q desipns,.for- large developments within Bixby, Business Park. 7 i L l DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE-- 32 LPA PROJECT NO. 85055.11 i d i 5.0 LANDSCAPE GUIDELINE5 1_ "fhe landscape consists of elements that give -Form to exterior spaces. `ems, the character of the landscape is created by elements .such as , ' streets and bullding s+�rl[s,-:the varie y..and placement of elements such zts signing, sate lighting, walkways, and plant; mateifals,,, and the arrangement of major functional elements such as project entrances, parking lots, buildings, service areas, etc. �1 2. Given the project architecture and building i J sites within Bixby Business Park will most likely be of varying types and sizes, land- scaping as a design element will play the key role ;n creating and conveying the overall character_as_a ".parklike" working envTI-ormerti: " Pee rca�o3e `i ti, mf these Master Landscape M 1esign Buidel'ines., is to provide design cri- teria iihich -achieves an image that is distinc- tive, clearly understandable, and unified. 5.2 THE BIX3Y BUSINESS PARK LANDSCAPE CONCEPT: - 1. The landscape is a key ingredient in blending architectural__massing, varied land uses, and DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE - 33 LPA PROJECT NO. 85055.11 D.2 r • City criteria into an overall character. The landscape serves to organize circulation AN Patterns, solar influences, areas -of differing uses and open space into a quality image. Rancho Cucamonga agricultural ;and historical ._. references are an integral factor in the proposed development. The landscape framework shall reflect land use, r roadway widths and open caace. Evergreen corridors running in a North/South' direction wilt provide shade patterns" while East/West corridors planted with deciduous trees encourage solar penetration. Pedestrian, bicycle and vehicular circulation patterns are designed to avoiii.conflict. The landscape or interior parcels shall recognize landscape framework, and extend the framework,where appropriate: 'Trees, shfubs and vines compliment the. arch i- I Y -tecture 'i;d soften-building massing. Shady parking areas nccor.. .under evergreen ^canopy, . l trees. Plant materials are selected for their' aesthetic quality as well as low maintenanc--. and water requirements. Automatic irrigate& and maintenance of all planting ensures their viability, 2. For additional information regarding the land- scape framework see the Bixby Business Park Landscape Development Plans.IL 5.3 SETBACK ZONE: S 'The setback zoneIs-that area which transitions the, streetscapes. to the project parking or A14 3°0 architecture. Each parcel owner shall be required to provide the following: tt? "'�7 1, Transition from the streetscape to the site landscape areas shall be smooth with grades not Y exceeding 3:I. 2. Plantings' shall .be continuous across easements lines, yt DESIGN GUIDELINES `PAGE - 34 LPA PROJECT NO, 85D55.;�' 0.2 r rr ' " 3. Sur-ace parking areas within the zone shalt be '�• _ screened by installation and proper clipping to maintaa' a continuous 3' high hedge consistent } with the plant list under item 4 below. 4. Landsape plantings shall be selected from the Ir following plant list; Trees - To match streetscape. } Shrub - Ligustrum japonica 'texanum' (Texas Privet) Groundcover - hedera helix 'hahnsil' (Hahn's 'Ivy) Lonicera japonica=-- r¢tY'' Aa=,*T ,Emvr,4V7-.r' veavnrnc, renrx (halls Honeysuckl'e)- Trachelospermum jasminoides N of A?a"r� (Star Jasmine) �eNr i rSv�av .Turf- 3o match. streetscape_ S-A-INTER10112ONEr The interior 'zone encompasses all exterior' elements within an individual p,irzel -excluding the streetscapes and the Building(s) area. This zone is subject to the needs of each individual tenant and thus is meant--,!k have a greater degree of flexibility than the streetscape zone. Common concerns within this zone include; landscape amenities, parking lot 1 arrangements and landscaping, site lighting, regulatory and directional signing, service area screening and side and rear property line treatment. 1Y_. Interior Zone 'Design Concept It -is intended that the interior zone 0 Bixby Business Park recall the orchard and/or rave-like infill character between hedgerows see development plan) -typical of California orchards. Parking lots are to be planted in geometric patterns W th low canopy evergreen trees. Subtle l.ght levels, restrained - raphics and screening of service areas will _ all co�itribute to reinforcing the Bixby Business Park landscape design concept. Parti- cular materials and treatments are outlined in the following design guidelines. , DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE. - 35` LPA PROJECT NO. 85055.11 - 0.2 2. Amenities "�_ To gesture the historical rural context of the site, design elements were established to fur- ther integrate the development to its surround- a ings. Pi anted arbr�s;trellises and pergolas will reference the' "vineyard" context. Theme_ elements will be integrated into a:l buiidi,-P designs as the major architectural unifyi1g Sf elements. It. will also serve as an element ; Alat will visually soften the architecture. Parcel owners are responsible to provide the following, i A. �Planted_:trboi s/pergolas will be required -as t a historic tie._,to the vineyards of Rancho f, Cucamonga. These arbor structures shall.be ,. r } independent or attached to' he buildings as k Accent tot-t�ilgang :entries, shelter {or ..inch = is or shade for the airtomobi ie. ' ` Structures shall, .be planted �;etith. :course �... te:tured vines. B. ;redestrian plazas or courtyards -sifall b.t provided immediately adjacent to or near the perimeter green pelt to promote the ii proposed "campus-like" setting. These �--* areas shall be designed as focal points. Interior plazas or courtyards, when pro- 3 posed, shall be:-�2condary to the plazas dr 1 courtyards adjacent to or near the peri- meter greenbelt. -- — C. Texturized pavement of brick pavers, .,ex- posed aggregate, a or • a combination thereof identifying pedes- tr<an paths shall be provided at all drive- way entrances and shall be subject to the ` Bixby Business Park Development Review Committee approval; and pedestrian connec- tion shall be provided from the perimeter sidewalk to main building entrance for each parcel. ,, 0. Landscape' plantings shall b,• selected from the following plant list- - Trees Nerium oleander (Oleander) Lagerstroemia indica (Crepe Myrtle) DESIGN GUIDELINES - .PAGE - 36 LPA PROJECT NO. 85065.11 D.2 ell Shrubs - Liriope muscar•i (Big Blue Lily Turf) Agapanthus africanus 'peter pan' (Dwarf Lily of the, Nile)' Vines - Cissus antartica (Kangaroo Treebine) 0•lC -P Bignonia violace (Trumpet Vine) " llibbertia scandens _ (Guinea Gold Vine) 3. Side and 'Rear Yard Requirements A. All site drainage.:,shall be. stir-et:�d saway 1 from the side or rear yard. •Drain-.e with- 3 in the side or r" ar yard may '':;w to an adjacent property. 'B. A--maximum s3�ope of 2.1 is allowed within ! .the side Dr .rear yard planting g _ r zone. A one foot minimum-flat transition shall be pra- vided at the top and bottom of a`rl slope within this zone. C. At all side and rear yard lines, whenever a development of a planted area adjacent to )e property line is proposed, the design ,ns. shall include a coordinating design ' the minimum parking setback area on the off-site side of the property line or plant material ana irrigation layout our- poses. If a wall is proposed on the prop- erty ling, the developer .if the lot shall install 'the landscaping an'o irrigation on the off-site -viet;.•ack area as'a temporary measure.-�untff such .time 'as'the off-site property develops. At that time, mainten- ance and irrigation of the areas shall he turned over,to the affected lot. D. Plantings shall be selected from the fol- lowing plant list: Trees - Cinnamomum camphor•a _ (Camphor) Ulmus parvifolia (Evergreen Elm) Ficus ruhignosa (Rust, Leaf Fig) DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE 37 LPA PROJECT NO. 85055.11 D.2 ^ o t Shrub$ Ligustrum japonica 'texanum' (_Texas Privet) Hibiscus rosy 'sinenss' white wings (Hibiscus) Raphiolepis indica 'jack evans.r (Indian Hawthorne) Groundcover - Hedera helix 'hafuw l' (Hahn's ivy) Loncera japonica (Hall's. Honeysuckle) Tracheiospermum jasminoides (Star Jasmine) 4. Parking Lot Lacdscaw-Requi semen'.•, i1.-. Parking location and 'Layout should facz:�- tate easy and safe pedestrian circulation. -F_ if thL- layout.is one or two rows' 1 deep, walking space with a minimum width of ! =�' 4 feet between;stalis should.b. provided at �. key locations- " s C. A minimum of one 15 gallon tree is'required' per each four parking stalls to be placed at the intersections and/or immediately adjacent to the stalls. D. Tree wells and planter areas within paving }- parking areas shall be square shaped and provide a minimum of 3 foot clear planting spac. E. Tree wells and planting edge curb$ should he used in lieu of wheel stops. f.-.A single species tree is to be used for each parking compound. The tree spec-.es _ may be different in separated parkirg 7 compounds. G. Convenience Parking H. The tree species is to be selected from the i. following plant materials list. If special soil or site conditions prevent the use of the recommended trees, Che property owner should recommend an al'cernative to Bixby Business Park Development Review Committee. DESIGN GUIDELINES PA GE 38 LPA PROJECT NO. 85055.1' 0.2 • I _ I. Plantings shall be seletLZ,� Lr-Ask following plant list: Tres - Ulmus parvi 11 folia (Evergreen Elm) : Cupaniopsis anacardiode-, (Carrotwood) Quercus ilex (Holly Oak) Ficus rubignosa „ (Rusty Leaf Fig) Shrubs - Ligustrum japonica.- (Texas Privet) Raphiolepis indica 'clara' (Indian Hawthorne) Hibiscus rosa,1sinensis` white • wings (Hibiscus) r R Building p2rimster Planting A. Accent-trees providirig contrast in texture, color or form to surrounding bui l dings and ! structured landscape are.td,_.be grouped in masses (such as smaT'1 Tloweritrrg -trze grove) or certain tree types planted as single large size boxed specimens for visual impact. The number of ' 'ferent species used shall be kept to a minimum to retain continuity. B. Accent vinL planting, shrubs and/or annual s/perreni als are to provide accent color at key visual points and Ichall be subject to approval by Bixby Business Park Development Review Committee. Pr6visions must be made for periodic replacement and must be maintained in good flowering condi- tion within district'planting areas or in planters or pots or appropriate size and type. C. Plantings shall be Felected from the fol- lowing plant list. " Trees - Brachychiton popuineus (Bottle Tree) Lagerstroemia indica (Crepe Myrtle) Nerium.oleander 'white' (Oleander) _ DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE,.- 39 LPA PROJECT NO. 85055.11 D.2 �. . .D Shrubs - Agapanthus africanus 'peter pan' (Dwarf..Lily.of the Nile) Liriope muscari (Big Blue Lily Turf) Nerium oleander 'petite' (Dwarf OIeander) Groundcouer - Impatiens wallerana as annual color Trachelospermum jasminoides (Star Jasmine) Vines - ►iibbertia scandens (Guinea Gold Dine) Cissus ant art ia (Kangaroo Tree-Bine) Bignania,uiolace (Trumpet Vine) ' C 3 -GEMERAL 'CONDITIONS: 3° } J. 3rrioation � A.' All irrigation systems shall be -Fully W fnatic, B. Low-volume irrigation equipment is encour- aged for all planted areas within the individual sites and shalt be completely automatic. C. No overthrowing of irrigation water onto '- walks, common area or any architectural' walks will be allowed. D. Utility cabinets and irrigation hardware to be screened by evergreen shrubs. -. Site Landscaping and Maintenance A. All Landscape within each parcel shall be a planted with materials in accordance with the planting palettes an;: criteria identi- fied in the Design G.idelines including trees groundcover, shrubs and vines.. B. All planting areas not in turf shall be Lop-dressed with a one inch layer of mulch, and bordered within a 2"x4�' size redwood headerboard (laminated to full size for curbed sections), or d" minimum wide concrete or masonry curb, DESIGN WIDELINES PAGE 40 DPA b' ',IECT NO. 85056.11 ',ra C. 'Plant matlprrials shall be installed as per d the fullWng details unless otherwise F approved. D. All areas of each lot not Used for structures, walkways, paved driveways, parking or storage areas shall be at 'all times maintained by a professional landscape engineer or gardener in a fully and well-kept landscape condition. E. The owner of,each lot shall, at all times - keep and properly maintain the entire ` ?". premises in. a safe, ,clears., .,sightly and wholesome condition, in a good state of i repair, and shalt comra'•u in all respects with governmental, hea�& fire and police requirements and regulations. F:Sites -that .are,not improved or built upon shall-be maintained.at al i,:times in a clean and neat appearances by- the property owner, '�y removal of weeds, grasses, mowed brush, and trash. Bixby Business Park- and i'ls representatives Lave the right to perform the necessary maintenance and charge the a individual tenant or property owner as necessary. } I 6ESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE 41 _ LPA PROJECT NO. 85055.11 - 0.2 63 771 6.0 SISNAGE GUMINES., 6 Objectives TD establish' a uniform design for sufficient,' though not excessive, business identification, while adhering to and. ndt exceeding the sign i ordinance for.the,.Czty xrf..Rantho .Cucamonga, and maintaining the architectural and landscaped concept of this development, f Guidelines 1. All signage shall conform to both written and illustrated design criteria. All drawings by manufacturer to bz approved by Bixby Develop- ment, Ltd. 2. No flashing or animation of signs will,,be per- ' mitted. K3. No internal illumination will be permitted ex.- cept as designated by Bixby Development. 4. Tenants sha'11 pay for installation and mainten- ance of all signs. 5. All signage not expressly covered in this cri- teria shall be allowed only after review and approval by the Bixby Bixby Park, Development Committee who reserves the right to deny ap- proval of any sign presentation which does not " complement the architectural and landscaped concept of this development. DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE 42 a LPA PROJ_CT NO. 85055.11 L D.2 6.1- TENANT IDENTIFICATION AND DIRECTORY MONUMENTS: r Each 6ssiness shall be allowed one wall sign per street frontage, not to exceed two per par- p cel and },'one monument per street frontage, not x to excee8:,two per parcel (refer to"Drawings A and B). ,?(owever, in no cyent shall a singl. parcel have,more than three s`.gns by airy con- bination of,t,wall and monument signs (refer to Drawings C awld D). Construction:,', !z r A. Tenant di�`,ectories to be Construction zts sheet aluminum cab inets.with.ramovoble ,copy+ panels. t B. Reveal inset to be 1-1I2" wide and.11 deep. G_ Base.±n-be natural roncrete-foundation with : 112". threaded steel rods for ..cabinet at- tachment. 2. Finishes; 1 A. Cabinet to be coated with aluminum compati- Aft primer and finished with a high quality gloss enamel (refer to Drawing C). B. Colors: To match Tenant Panel Assembly: Ameritone 298-F "Silver" Address Panel Assembly: Ameritone 262-A "Dutch Blue" . R�va3 Ameriione 2D39C "Compass" _ Copy: 3M Scotchcal Vinyl Graphics - Matte Black Base: Natural Concrete/Sandblast Finish 3. Copy: A. All cop; to be Helvetica.. Medium .Vini-i Graphics with one a rid es per monument. DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE - -33 LPA PROJECT NO. 85055.11 D.2 J 4. Date ign FormatAft . A. Single tenant {refer to Drawing 1), " 1. 6" maximum letters.' t. 3 rows maximum. 3. Space between rows to be 1/3 letter height. 4, Copy to be flush with left edge of + panel 5". z 5. Address numbers, to he 411 Wgh and,;.f"sl with top of uppermost, , B. Two tenants (refer to 1;r�,Ang G-2) Ek s 1 4" maximum Setters- 3. Spare between letter rows' 'to be 1/3 letter height. 4. Copy to be flush with "left edge ofAsk 3 panel 511. 5. Address .numbers to be 4" high and flush with top' of uppermost line of copy. C. Three tenants (refer to Drawing D-3) T. 4" maximum letters 2. 2 rows maximum 3. Space between letter rows to be 1/3 letter height_ 4. Copy to be . flush with left edge of panel 5" 5. Address numbers to he 4" high and flush' with top of uppermost-line.of,copy. - DES GN GUIDELINES doalk LPA PRO3ECT NO. $5055.11 PAGE - 44 D.2 y D. Four tenants (refer to Drawing C-4), Peero--oo JY A,t jmFv SrcN L. 4" maximum letters,' 2. 2 rows maximum. 3. Space between letter rows to be 1i3 letter height. 4. Copy to be flush with left edge of panel 3", 5. Address numbers to be 4" high and flush with top of uppermost line of copy. E. Greater than four tenants (refer to'Drawing Y Q_ I. Use same- format as A-single tenant signage, single address, and Business ..Bailding I-D. name. In this situation a directory will" be ( required. The design and format:;to-'be submitted to Bixby Business Park Devel npntent Comm1 ee and the Cit of Ranchho AOL Cuca_mo4,ngga. �i2 �o2vi�as SttfiT�C 7718 Pl '*=M a2 'eq�--R479U 9:71TQe4wcc rc7 - 'p 1 oP,rt f 5.2 WALL SIGNAGE (REFER TO DRRAWING E) T 1 A. Letters shall be made from 1/4" thick aluminum or equivalent., B. Letters to be flush mounted to wall j surface. X_ Copy and letterstyle: ITC Garamond Book Itzlic.D. Formate 1. Sinale line: 12" maximum in height and 20' maximum in length. -Upper and lower case. 2. Double line: copy may be uppercase I2" maximum in height :and 201 maximum in length 4" between limes of copy. DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE - 45 LPA PROJECT NO. 85055.11 D.2 3<` {lop of dopy to be flu,h with top of wall opening (refer to Drawing E). 4. Copy to be flushed parallel to wall opening 24" (refer-to Di-,raving E). 1 E. Finishes: Letters to bef;nished in a high qual- ity enamel to match the following. ' 2. Iflwal1 is light tone, letters si;all, be deepest accent colr of the building. loci3. • I iwall As dark tone, -]utters shal'1'. be l ghtest accent.color Of the building T 'or ono„ L— i 3"MDRESS NUMBERS(REFER TO DRAWING F) 3 A. There shall•be-vnly one (1) address number per parcel. B. Numbers shall be same dimensional, strut- C- tural and color criteria as ,,"fall Signage". C. Typical placement of address numbers (refer to Drawing F). 6.4 DOOR SIGNAGE (REFER TO DRAWING E) A. Copy to be vinyl graphics applied to d P door- glass grass or adjacent window glass next to door. Grahics to mat 'h 3M Scotchcal "Pearl Grey". All copy is tti� be Hel veti ca Medlium letterstyle. Custom logo an or ogo let terstyle m? be used upon approval by Bixby < Business r-ek Development Review Committee. B. See drawing for exact size and placement of copy. L6.5 ON-SITE VEHICULAR TRAFFIC SIGNS A. Stop signs (refer to Drawing G) L1. Stop sign panel arid post to be aluminum fabr-ication finished in a high quality gloss enamel. u ° DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE - 46 f LPA PROJECT NO. 85055.11 L 0.2 ..f. 'L- Sign copy to be silkscreened or viny' graphics. l/I 3. Sign post to be 24" below grade with concrete.-footing. 4. Copy: Helvetica Medium Conde ',ed. ' S. Colors:: Co �+ py panel background and post Ameritone 298A "Grey Cloud" ;k Octagonal Border - White Octagon - Red Copy - White i '• B. No-parking signs (refer'to Drawing H). -.SPecifizatinns sane as "stop Sign-,. 2. `Colors: '-Copy-petrel background and fast - Amer•itone 29BA ".Grey Cloud' Color band and lower tnpy .. L Matte Black Note: Al copy to be according to specifications required by Bixby Business Park Development-Review Ct.ami`tee. C. Handicaprt{ signs (refer to Drawing fff 1. Specifications same-as "stop sign". 2_ Color Background Handicapped parking blue Copy - White { Note: All copy to be according to specifications required by Bixby Business Park Development Review Committee and City of 'Rancho { Cucamonga Regulations. D. FiT lane signs (refer to Drawing H) 1. Specifications same as .;dp sign" DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE - 47 y LPA PROJECT NO. 85055.11 D.2 N., 2. Colors. Same as no parking signage. a; Note: 'All copy to be according to E specifications required by Bixby Business Park Development_Review. Committee anc " City of Rancho t, .ucamonga ReguYations. s , 3 , ;t i DESIGN GUIDELINES F'AGE - 48 f LPA PROJECT NO. 85055 D.2 i :c ;aaJ1S 4;�!d l ' o Q Cl rn ~ ' c ' CO E' } Afflk LO qU i 1 —,J I j ) m I- 0 o W94S 43x!S leaks q}ina {mom_ A h, —_'— _.—_�.ti..}.�•_p� r t y. r A coIlk 96 la s h .O T iS CQ ¢ t l 1 `fit =1i ~� IMF 6k•' (j4C �{ad v M a � � eo wp Wow - 'I 4VV e y ca ' .� Pill Fool� ---------------- CC) e� a 24 1 P 1 V 4 y^ i n ya1 y� v'C a qt a 1 R 1 ubl 53 1 � � oo 3 4 d e q f r M \\� • W • i <� r 4 cu cu vLu t� w9 TA UAL ` a i8 ar as s ��.. 1 ' Ll u S 1 i{1917 ! I 1 A -. Plili= t - .Y• v�. - i E ul ti to i o' i V M M 4 ♦y ~ u B ? " n � o O � < a n Lam' l / � �,� _.,�. ,�,�,.r. i � �� { `� �'. �F;a �' T 1� �� .,`_ -�f � l�k. �. - _��r `� ,. ,. - "•i V� ma', � / K� {.J .�/� T - El _� - i�Z � `� �` �oc � •�i Cl 1 (;ti� - •i.V� . _ .. • •. 1 �.� '. �. �\ �.`: - r. � L � :. tZ3 yy + J l ¢a 3 - Ju ?p r1 1 i Y 7.0 LIGHTING GUIDE.TNES 3' Objeet-vet T 1_ To hate m-site 1i Afti� runtrifi� to the safe a --and efficient use rif a-i:Helop lent site. 2.' to have 01-site lighting? contribute to ;,Ite security. 3. To have` on-tile lighting cunpliment and rein force the architecture .and site design chara.- Y ter. 4. To have on-site parking lot lighting "fixtures and illumination levels be consistent through out Bixby Business Park. S. To prevent on-site lighting from casting glare ontc.adJacent Lots. ✓ 5_ To-prevent on-site lighting from casting glare otrto adjacent lots. 7. To encourage lighting design that is in confor- mance with energy saving guidelines. Guidelines 1. Ail lighting potentiaiiy ii sib 1e from an adja- cent street except bollard lighting less than 42 inchas high, shall be indirect or shall in- corporate a full cut off shield type fixture. DESIGN GUIDELMES VME - 49 LPA PROJECT NO. 85055„11 a.2 2. Parking areas, access drives, and internal vehicular circulation areas - All parking lot lighting fixtures_shall ',be a zero cut off Guardco - Form Ten EH or a fixture of similar n "shoe-box" type design mounted at 18' " atop a square metal pole. Both the fixture and pole are to have a durable white finish. The light source shall be high pressure sodium. -. The parking lot illumination level shall achieve a R uniformity ratio of 3 to 1 tav!:rage to minimum} with a maintained average of 12 foot candle and i a minimum of .3 foot candle. snr\ 3. Service area lighting shall be contained within -- St the service ..yard .boundaries and -encl.osure 1. walls. No light spiTiover should occur outside cca.Gwr the service area. The ligiK source should not z be visible from the ;street, i 4- :Building illumination , and architectural lighting shall be t jdirect in _character., (No 7 i gtrt source visible}. " Indict wall lighting +-- for "wall washing" overhead siown lighting, 'or . .i �� interior illumination which -spills outside is � encouraged. Architectural lighting should - 4— articulate and animate the particular bu i'ding A"94 tk uryuTioN ' design as well as provide the required sKn�tc� rFor1 sue: functional lighting for safety and clarify of .. pedestrian movement. - I 5 Pedestrian walk and are alighting is segmented into zones, A. The first zone is pedestrian are alighting. This is for outdoor pedestrian use such as courtyard, entry way, etc,,, Pedestrian area. lighting should achieve a uniformity ri:tio ' of 3.5 to 1. average to minimum, with an average illumination.`of .60 foot 'candles and a minimum of .18 toot candles. B. The second zone is pedestrian walk lighting - where point to point lighting,is acceptable with no specific illumination levels re- quired. The main emphasis in this zone- � � � should be to clearly identify thr peees- trian walkway and airection of travel. DESIGN GUIDELINES r P4Gr - 30 LPA oROuE.CT NO. 85055 11 D. o .. . •. y A i) 8.0 APPENDIX a .--row.ACT AND ILEFERENCE.L::-,T �J MOPER ' Bixt�y Ranch Ccmppnu } 911 Studebaker Road Long Beach, Cali1ornia 90805 TR;ephone: (213) 493-1475 Aft Ron Bradshaa t Judi McCaslin BIXBY BUSINESS PARK DESIGN CONSULTANTS ?RCHITECT Leason Pomeroy Associates Architecture, Planning, Interior Design ,44 Plaza Square _ Orange, California 92666 Telephone: (714) 639-5541 rhilip Kro:ze, AIA Richard Clarke, AIA LANDSC,tPE ARCHITECT The Puna Group . 260 Newport Center Drive, Suite 400 Newport Beach, California 92660 L Liephone: (714) 6404,300 Tom Runa, 1S'A .. _. . Kevin Sullivan, ASLA DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE LPA PROJECT NO. 85055.11 D.2 . � I .CIVIL ENGINEER \ Fuscoe, Williams, Lindgren& Short - 61V,.?arkcenter, Suite 114 F Santa. Ana, California 92705 u}` ` Telephone: (714) 336-4455 Pat Fuscoe Steve May f SIGNAGE/GRAnHICS Signarts 1•Y31 E. Pomona Santa Ana, Cal i forni a<9227.05 Telephone: ;(714)-973-2157 ` Mike Valentine., Craig Hunnicut _'.SQVERNMENTAL-AHENCTES City of Rancho Cucamonga z 9320 Baseline Road P.O. Box 807 Rancha Cucamonga, California 91730 Telephoned`*` Planning Depa tment k ' 8 ` = C7i4) 1 DESI N REFEREN ES Rancho CucamonglIndustr' 1 Ar a Specific Plan Rartc�.� CcQa W-'� — G Rancho Cucamonga gn Ordinance ' Biafiy Business Park CURts _ r Controlling Building Codes Building Color Palette Landscape Master Plan and Sections Parcel Maps and Existing Engineering Plans DESIGN GUIDELINES- PAGE - 52 LPA PROJECT NO. 85055.11 D,2, i_ .. BUILDING COLOR PALLETTE AM tmw rF A. Building Accent Colors: 1. Ameritone 261 A "Corsa-fr'Blue" 261 8 "Versailles Slue" 261 D "Larkspur" 261 G "Pompadour Slue", : l: 2. Ameritone 262 A 11Lrh-t ,lue' - 262 B "dava 4an Slue" 262 D "Great Lakes;' 262 F "Ebb Tide" J. Ameritone 153 A "Velvet t soon" 153 B "Norman Rose" a 153 O 'Oriental Rose" 153 ri 1161scay Pink 4- -fter tone_'I90Q A „Pipe�-".oneN .1900 .R "I1ed firth" -w " -1900 D "Prairie Tose" 1900 G „Canypn-Pink" 5. Ameritone 174 A „Sierra 174'8 "Sherwood Green" 174 D "Tampico Turquoise" *` 174 G "Dusty Turquoise" 6. Ameritone 179 A "Grotto,Green" 179 8 "iiusty 44de" 179 D "Milpon0 179 F "5hadabluis" B. Main Building ;olars: 1. Ameritane 198 F "Antimony" 198 G "Vista Gray" 198 H "'Document Gray" 3 2. Ameritone 298 F "Silver" C98 G "Badger" 2S3 H "Gr4jo Cloud" 3. Amerito-,; 297 F "F gather Gray" 297 G "Neutral Tint', 297 H "Chinchilla" - DESIGN `WIDELINES PAGE - 53 LPA PF.OjECT NO, 85055:11 D.G THE RUNA —. RECEIVED GROUPlr. ClT PLAi 2'OF r'NCHO CUCAraIONG A � J �INiDiGi�4tStON �.. ` Lanascape a• ,« Architectur` L IQ vb 4 Site Planning Q� '�g��it1��11tS211ti�ti3>,`�4�4� 4 September 1986 Planning Commission n . Clay of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Saseiine Road <. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 917311 Projects BlySY/!RANCHO CUCAMONGA Rancho Cucamonga, CA TRG 0ob No., 864O Subject: Response-16,`J ann ing 'Dear Commission.- The fol lowing is a summary 16f condl'l-tons in the Plann,ing Resolution 85-09 that has been addressed and met in our Master Plan working drawings for the Bixby/Rancho Cucamonga project. included in this summary Is a brief response to each condition. Condttion Perimeter landscaping for the entire site/blaster Pear. shall be provided with Phase I development to emphasize the image of the rtcampus-i ikon setting with a unifying landscape theme and ccntinuous pedestrian walkway. The entire landscape setbaa, for Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, MkIlTkon and- y Pittsburgh streets wi(I be Installed with the Phase i deveIopmen•t. These setbacks shall Inc,)rporate Meandering walks that travel through a combination of undulating turf mounds and eucalyptus and pine gro+ es. People spaces such as lunch courts wi i i interface with the 1'*ndscape setbacks. The combination of ttpeople spaces" and landscape articulation of the setback edges will establish a park-like character or atmosphere. Articulation of these setback edges Is addressed in the master lan'ascape plans as prepared by The Runa Group. Condition location and conceptual design of transit stops and related pedestrian facil itles shah I be provided and sha l l be subject to Design Review ! Committee review and approval. 260 Newport Center Drive,Suite 400 Newport Beach,California 926607524 714 64f7-22300 `' THE Planning Comm?,ssion - CityRUNA of Rancho Cucamonga Page Twa of Two GROUP BiXB'/RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Rancho Cucamonga, CA n Sepfiert�er 1986 Per phone conversations with Brad flu l i er of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and alleen Lubber of Omni-Trans on 21 July 1986, pavl'ng only to accomodate`future transit stops at Fourth and Milliken and Fifth ari Milliken shall be provided with Master clan installation. See Master Plan i andsc4a plans'sheet L2.1 and 1-2.2. ConditloR The conceptual design of the ItGatewayn, a ^>:mboIIc entry statement. shall be provided to 4t* Street and Milliken Avenue; ano;r.,,44- r scale Project entry statements shah, be emulated at 6th`Street and MI111ken, t6 -fth Street.and Pittsburgh, .and 4th Street and Pittsburgh. gh. L The Gateway entry stitemenle at 4th Street and Mi?1ika`n shg!1 incorpora;v project, city and s+reet Identification Into a symbc„I-C 'badge and tree bosque. nScaled down" versions of this gateway shall occur at 6tb and Mi I t iken, 6th and Pittsburgh, amd 4th and Pittsburg';h. These t1scated down" Versions shall main#ain tna symbol is landscape!,treatment iiut wi only carry project identification Conditlon A statement through the use of landscaping sha i I be made to pr ov Ide a i v sus( connectior, befiween the north and south side of 5th Street subject E to City Planner approval. j ReG once.The Jandscape wonting drawings call for both sides of nth Street to be Iinod with Camphor trees ar.0 turf ber-s. t ,.ddltion, symbolic groundcover and shrub gateways prov ided at the contra I project entry drives create a visual node or tie between both sides of the street., If you require -.,y additional informatlon, please donit hesitate to call. Sincerely, THE RUNA GROUP, INC. 4 Jim Ridge Project Manager JRA-za l cc: Ms. Judy McCas In - Bixby Ranch Coq-ony 1 J lilo ul C-y If TM, -------- d J� • is ! ,(N slc 3!t BIN �5+. � � r,A + 3. � '�r� sc..Ao•-:ic.�.:,na.-tav,-`uric.c�tws�-.r'�B:Kc-wtca:e•..c... ... '. .cotrFtS.,�csP.F.•rCe<...a�.�e..a:.�•zea R..S. ..�;. j n - n � �,xrEw.av N.ca.�.x-�gr� -•-• •�'•��) g� aas�sn�c� p.�,,��7�7� �•.ccv a w¢�rt sz¢�i 9fQ�"""✓ ��iiFG1ti7�($6 J'j,T �FC r y -�- CdZ'X OF.�1XCffDl:ilCdBlQNGA ^�- °s• i �.. -,,•• 4. ,,ass . 6. _ - ..� �� B m•'^T..ie' r• '. ,�,:i`�as:.+Y. to'tee. ;if+:,ti`-q" "' t�j , Y , n k} - RAG Ja'LT t••fCwlW.ypy�Z•,.e."s eyy;EyM CG.�F.y3;vt�-C 454.SZFEt_'tt,spC Pr�'Csa..+atrlE d.'^^ s�Rvett F'.(9•o.c.7 . 'R4fCSP�aRst NS•A`T`i Vy'12"SQ.IRSY.snnE73t'P' i£ '. MRUKM AVE v p�zrcn.ts sew !°'�::.$��S• ' of � ., - •R�*tp, _,�•t.,, yy'� suuucr asv.ccnwwar .� ,�#.. t• c..r.c,a*ti`ebb~ �� ". AE 'mil TAL GtGi1• :..CLP"J+�'0�1RT•16"C � - �l.f JJ�ItGW-6Ci5NANY'�10•�lUwn¢UT 1XYic�IL'+CATetii 4Sa8sN.sePPo�3'1^b.StT`nCf�T1�w'['MtLuueYa•`•+Ge.6Tt GT++d Vt'Pf'SOu ti PLl%2'M.Pt1'R'•�B.J0.iFt<+a8'rt♦c3••wC�� eW-®C^I,�q"•Ga sB>RKASNCIG G�Lgt'04RF3^L�'�?.v/Pi.1..t�e.,G�JIi{}1 • - NORTH � CITY OF r Ir��t: PANCHO CT C MONGA PL.ANI`,NGr DIVI(aN EXHIBIT-i _ _SCAC _ . 'G f -11 '26e, P, 1 .AN f 2 I i� IDWS � � � O P- �i�� r�j+ r•1�rt2 ski �,t^ � � .-�" 7Z/,- ✓ ` • s� j1 sz I_po NUR"I H CITY OF ITEi*vI: RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: �'✓ 5� PLANNING DI VISI '�I EXHIE4- CALE; ' /' NCST�.z"b?-ALt_ SIGN G�Rkpwce, 5Ec ATCPCFIE,. 'N?ICAL. 1AONUMENT 51&M -FAt-FS fQ V ;CJ� '� rn'��'�� i L� •,..4.44' .rS y �°;\'q�'w.e vtyti � ��S/rb}ti+K � V" lr1OW�7�/P ...�r \.'''�..."' .�:._,�-�'`i '•`-w�=Yrx..a °o t 114s�l l �'-0'� u��t}.,'S �a7 y�FY'� Fi�yi�,{ `x F fh yR(� M G�'�'�" �y4 �.�b•�t.� Yn Y _ QV �' ,�r, y a-'t+dt F �' }- ��9��s.� .t� :ivft+c }•n�� Sirr� s''p'�"��'� ,d-<.3µ" dr;.,a",�y, .n.a,�ri;�',�w..� �'i.i�l` � r °,..s ,re^',ri...kt=d: ��G (�•;af,9 CITY OF ITELVI: RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: PLANNING DTVLSTCX'V EXHIBIT-. .LSCALE:�,r.; Jr�� ' �wt,lalrn I 1 I ! r,ru;lr9 i9e aYrYlafra II I �, ; ;i� Mill nil 'µ O 133Yi9'7.a t'• 1 _ 171 f fi 0 flt ft +a i ,°, eii l of eEi nl r a C � ! r t• i a ,V%. .., �t• 'M 33�W tv if /.I:'�, = w� �it�1��RJ��i• )�� i� ■ --� t 'i ii �.1 �. a.; 1 � � ��„ ` li � it i s iJ it�t it t{► ��Ij� r tt �i tr...'� � a i�� J��t !7i ;i31 '�►i 1 ij i�s, . _ ,, t 1, �;•ji i J(� !�� Jiil�� !i p it airil 1 f a it TalusN19�"' ��.' . �` i "SwnKaivn 1 i 1. !3 I�IyF� � F�-�•' � _<� it I�t t 7'��i�1 1. in e.Sk t' 412 i � W if t S7 133N8 17N 3NIlH�lY11-.I- lr� -i •'3NIlN�lYnl }��! " i s l� •-.t aw,i l�hn, i {.kiti2 fi 'f t I � w"• � � e � j•r F! W�. T w +t•i q � { .� �' r��s t < W ewe Yck M r1 UP 1 1 r4 r 3 ��• i ka,; ''r , m W4 771 It!. 133tl14 Nt- 3� ' '�NI)��'''.� 1 311111��1"1�" �•• ��Sk11 y 't�,-��. � � IT n I �•Ir r C!u Hs 73f •'N3ArlHpwn."-asL1N- —rs••.. Jj.p �• 1_ I r1' S 1�r � �_. S� I A �� i � a—'3N•Tn.NaNnSstlia � {I!33S JIM lit m ��. 4 •aY Y�ta ••S^ t+ v VI r O I 4 .7NITN]LI, I.... ' a 1 J ♦ !1 c ' �� 7.133Nf 37fµ`� �•t'YT'77N�7;t]NI1NO�f1 r� ' �j i a Y N31r1,iA(•- -�_ nN ArIN ul�- /,j+�/./�J]�/'�y • y; t 3 it° rfrti y ��:i ff r i !4k4k f;!#f�i}}ili �1e 31 it i iC i�3f f t i.`lf;fl ��} Ywsxr✓bvut:a LL.. d It t . riIt {{ qq ( f f :i i4 i4,j{Ii;�siSl .�...� _ _ _._.__.� 1:.1 �'� •i !�{��f;Iji ftl'tfii u " y ...�••..� f:. l� +LLI�JJ � � j z , s c1c f� qq 31 ilf°it., if �ff1 lit Ill �t �{�� ,�t Icc ;' =t �lf�l's��• t 1�: k � y H Y1IWI NTfl1'1 l y 9 I CITY OF R�`NCHO CUC.A,11ONGA 1 STAFF REPORT l 1 � r a ¢ DATE: September 24, 198E ! �S j TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission 197 i FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Joe Stofa, Jr., Associate Civil Engineer R S4aJECT: VACATION OF 22nd STREET - Iozated between Turner Avenue and Deer Creek Channe U"[ e IE :BACKGROUND Mr. Georg Rast'of 894a Turner'4venue is requesting the vacation of 22nd ,Street.between' 1 •;rer Avenue-and Deer i mek Chmmel (-refer'to Exhitlt a B). Mr. Rust owns all, the property on tl„ north side of.22nd Street to be vacated. J i ANALYSIS The s �subject 22 d _� n S t rEet is 8© feet wideand' u t is not part of any circulation system and the present alignment is; not requiredfor orderly development of the area. The owners of the property on the south side of the street have been notified and are in agreement with the vacation. If vacated, the portion of street will .revert back to the adjacent properties, RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the street vacation and forward it to City Council for final approval. Respectfully.submitted, l "4ml `f'rW,AW&VU Barrye R. Hansom Senior Civil Engineer BRH:JS:me i ITEM, Q t Yti =•. 4 � .. a r f � 0 ILB� `t f f•4 ��:'Yy'y 4+t).r 4 4P_ }.:a-t/Fa-+'+�+-w" 437..�°, � ,w'f` T " 5. R O�VE�,.Cy�ECi tS F R) � r W-C,'.&'T—( RUST j vaeAT Iont (NUMEZ 6 -- VAC AN 4. LLJ VACANTcc w cc i•� w Lu r—� I (VACATED) NOTE: _. o.. ®PQATiOt1 TO RUST PROPERY RORT t Oty TO NUNE7-PAOPaRTY CITY 0 RANCHO CUCAMONGA- nTLE-1 � DIVIERON arr "Q° ,,