Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986/10/08 - Agenda Packet k Q ar ;" g.� RACdf 00 YeoCLC�:f� C MY OF IN MISSION t97 WEDNESDAY OCTOBER 8,1385 7:00 p.m. r•aONS FApx cOdlmunry CENTER 9161 BASE LINE RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIF ORNIA L Plefte of AHeglance Ih Ball call `Commissioner Barker Commissioner Tolstoy_ Commissioner Chitiea Commissioner Stout Commissioner McNiel t 11L Annouxements IV. Approval of Minutes August 27 4986 September',.9,1986 V. Publie Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned indLVduals may voice their opinion of the related proizot. Please. wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall-be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. i A. ENVIROMMENTAL ASSESSMEF( AND CONDITIONAL USE € ' PERMIT 86-15 - MESSENGER/CROWN COACH The establishment of a motor home/tim assembly business within an existing 168,000 squsrP foot industrial building and the 83,000 square foot expansion of the existing building on 11.8 acres of land in the General Industrial/Rail Served District (Subarea 2), located at the southeast corner of Arrow Highway and Vineyard Avenue-:,,PN 209-12-15. (Continued from September 2a,1986 meeting.) DEVELOPMENT .REVIEW 86-13 - MODIFICATION - MESSENGER-The request to modify the previously approved Master Pin by reducing the site area of Phase III from 4.4 acres to Z4 acres an the General Industrial/Rail Served District (Subarea 2),located at the northeast corner of 9th Street and Vineyard Avenue-APN 209-012-16. '1 t. ,y h } B. `IEL.OPMENT AGREEMENT - SCHLOSSER FORGE - AnDP NDMENT NO. I";- An amendment extending the term ruin twenty=ive years -for a'development rgreement between othe City of RR',p-bc��CucavaIonga and Philip D. x,Schlosser, Elaine M. Schloss a! r gabert Holguin, Jr., Roberts. J..' Holquin, Jeffrey P. :Schlosser," Jacquelin L. Schlosser, David M. Richardson and Gene M. Richardson, re# ding the future development and current operations of the industrial facility on 27.7 acres at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue-APN 229-111-05, 17 and 18. C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE :. PERMIT-rfi-07 - GENERAL TELEPHONE - A proposal to r Todate a 624 square foot unmanned remote switching station i at 9090 19th Street-APN 202-221-08. D. VIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT .4:kD CON:DITIONAL USE PERMIT 86:17 GENERAL TELEPHONE A'proposal to locate a 665 square;foot unmanned 0mote switching station k north of Highland and east of Milliken-APN 225-141-29. E. ENVIRONMENTAL A4kSE.SSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 86-21 -RAXINDR& RAO -The establishment of a q k printers in an existing building with a lease`space of 00 square feet in the General Industrial/Rm, Served 1 (Subarea 5) category of the;Industrial Specific Plan,located at 10088 6th Street,Suite M APN 209-211-39. F`. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVJEW 86-12-NAI'3ANDIAN GROUP The development o 114'upartment units in the :Medium Density Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) located on the south side of Arrow Route,east of Madrone Avenue-APN 2077262- 07,25,26. G. TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT S''6-02 WESTERN PROPERTIES A request to ¢mend the Terra Vista Planned Community by establish:mg a business park overlay zone for areas designated as Office Park, Commercial and Mixed Use, within the Plaimed Community Boundary APN 1077-421-06, 1077-091-17. r H. ENVIRO�MENTAL_ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13192-LEWIS HOMES A total development of a residential subdivision of 6.6,7 acres within the Low-Medium (4 8 dwelling units per sere)Iand use designation within the Terra,; r Vista Planned Community into 62 lots, located on the north` ,f' side of Terre Vista Parkway,east of Spruce-APN 10774914-'— 23,24. MOD]Er ATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT`44-09 ISHII-;,A request to modify a condition a approv,.0 regarding completion of Los Cedros Avenue and Lerrera Street with - modified cul-de-sac improvements-APN 227-01-23 and 65. J. MODIFICATION TO CONDrrIONAL USE PERMIT 86-02 - COM1YsUNITY BAPTIST CHURCH - A modification, to a previously approved Conditional Use Permit to allow the use f. of two temporary ttyailers as classrooms during the construction phase of a 5,400 square foot expansion of an existing church facility in the Medium Density Residential D14triet (8-14 dwelling units per acre),' located at the northwest eornei -f 19th Street and Beryl Street-APN 201- 221 08. VI. New Busing � K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DE FELOPMENT ,., REVIEW 86-26-AJA-DARTON -The development',of a RMT acre industrial blaster Plan; Phase I development:consisting ¢ of 7 light manufacturing buildings totaling 86,592 square feet a on 4.29 acres of land; and Phase Il davela ment consisting of 9 light manufacturing,buildines totaling ?51,000 square feet on 7.49 acres of land, in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8), located betweert Arrow Highway and Jersey Avenue, between`Utica Avenue and Vincent Street - APN 209-142-15,14,34,10,12. L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT' AND DE7ELOPMENT REVIEW 86-20 - HIMES-PETERS ARCHITECTS The development of three warehouse-distribution uildings totaling 237,519 square feet on 11.06 acres of land in the General InduslL-ial District (Subarea 13) located at the northvrrest corner of 6th'Street and Rochester Avenue APN - 229-261-38,39. r; •—c �d"7G* ate.. �`1l r. ..w^«..�..,-,....,R;§� c y� 4 IIL. Dimetox'l M. t.''4DIT10-NAL USE PERMIT 84-31 - DIVERSIFIED Thi: r eVit�o compliance o Haven Villag Canter with the approved plans,located at the south sine of Lemon,t7,ast of Maven,north side of HiC land Avenue-A]`N 201-271 53. N :TERRA VISTA HOUSINQ AFFORDABILITY UPDATE n C5< MDI}IFYCATIONS TO MULTI-FAMILY `PAIMING i �STANDARDS.- A proposal to arnend the Develcgment Code to upgrade existing parking requirements for all multi-family � projects. 1 f V1IL ti4!aaaeH$efert� P. DiSCUSSIOP, OF MINIMUM LOT SIZES AND MINIMi3M DwELLINC UI+IIT-SrLES''FOR SINGLE FAMU,Y LE l ACHEI3 XND ZEmJ LOT LIhE htOtISING Liras Report by.Tack Lamy. IX. Commissica'sualnew j S. pw."z Comm" f 1 71(a is the time WW place far ti}(,'general ptmbl:c to address the Commission, Items to be dii&43{etl here are those which do not alreadyappear on this agenda. XL A&joumment The Planning, Commission has adopted Adminisrrrative Regulations that set an 31 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission, VICINITY MAP LJ L.s ': a SPHERE OF INFLUENCle 1 HIL LSIDJ i sr i WWI.L — c-- us !! t t4 1 x BA AN O ..f i�.�w StDIA Ii �,� 4 j� I fl ?NIL FR EYl_AY arzs s t9 N A _.t HIGHL NR a a 119 R ' VI 'i RIA i tl �.5 Ind i'{FNMi� 1�1f�Nr H'HiPtHH1f�+NFe�.... ryn� �Aew+.eN»rM4;�ry .a m AS TINE ' SCs >r� r� 2 CHURCH .yam a t�.telADILLER Zwi • ,..' ..�;.....-wt 1 <1 s FCO HILL j c w 1 ar Pik t ® • D O 0 W < $thus t? !a7! 2 x z 3 r <. SANS RHAR@INO FREEw Y AIL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1 CITY OF RANCHO GOCAMCNGA STAFF REPUR1L` C i CS 4: H z, BATE: October 8, 1986 1977 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planrer BY., Nancy Fong, Associate Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ISSESS14ENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 86-15 M S`5ENQER F=---CCO - e esta 7s men. of a moto`rnoira us assemDly busiress within an'ekisting 148,000 square foot Industrial building, and the 83,000 expansion of such existing industrial building onji.8 acres of land , in the General industrial/Rail Served District (Subarea. 2), located at the southeast corner of Arrow Highway ar.J Vineyard Avenue = APR 209-013-15. (Continued from September 24, 1986 at the request of the applicant) DEVELOPMENT' REVIEW 8643 - ,MODIFICATION - MESSENGER The request to modify e previous y approve Master an by reducing the site area=of Phase III from 4.4'acres to 2.9 acres in "the General Industrial/fiatl Served District (Subarea�i), located at the northeast carver of 9th Street and V�iheyard Avenue - APR 209-012-16. (Continued from September 24, .1986 at the request of the applicltnt) I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested Approval of a Conditional Use Permit for a motor ome us . assembly use, and approval of site plan,- elevation, and modification to Prase III of the Master Plan for Development Review 86-13. B. Surrounding Land use and Zoning: o13ORIN -` Apartment under construction; Medium Residential District (8-14 du/ac). South - Vacant; General Industrial/Rail Served .(Subarea 2). East - Vacant withapproved 26-acre industrial master plan; General Industrial/Rail Served (Subarea 2): West - Mini warehouse, multi-tenant industrial pack; General Industrial (Subarea 1). ITl«M A _. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 86-15 - MESSENGER/CROWN COACH October 8, 1986 Page 2 C. General plan Designations: `roject SiteGeneral ndustrial/Rail Served. North Medium Density Residential.- South General Industrial/Rail Served. East - General industrial/Rail Served. West General Industrial. D. Site Characteristics: The site is developed with a 168,000 square foot-i-nAu-s-t—ri-al building with approximately`280 parking spaces, The southern portion of the project site is vacant and is part of a previously approved Phase III of the Master Plan for DR 86-13. E. Applicable Regulations: The proposed use is categorized as me Sum manu ac uring which requires a Conditional Use Permit within General 'Industrial/Rail Served District Subarea 2 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. II. ANALYSIS: A. General:, The site was originally developed as a iranufacturin u1, ang for Otis Elevator, Plant and was last occupied, by a Ank Wheat Motorhome Assembly.. The existing building is presently unoccupied. Some on-site and o �-site improvements exist; however, certain improvements are considered as non conforming'. For example, missing improvements include such items as meandering sidewalks, extra 4-foot dedication along Arrow Highway, on-site landscaping, screening of outdoor storage and plaza areas: Crown Coach International is proposing to relocate from their Chino facility to this existing building. They are proposing to expand the existing building by adding 83,000 square feet of- floor area in order to accommodate their assembly business of motorhome and scK,� l buses. To comply with the City's parking requirements, the site area has to expand southerly to include a portion of Phase III of an approved plaster Plan (Development Review 86-13) as shown in Euhibi'ts "C" and "D". Since both parcels are owned by the same developer, Messenger Investment Company is requesting for -an amendment to the previously approved Master Plan by reducing the size of the Phase III site area. To alleviate heavy traffic along Vineyard Avenue, the developer is providing access to 9th Street through Phase III of the Master Plan of DR 36-13, and take advantage of the> traffic lights at the intersection of 9th Street and Vineyard Avenue. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 85-15 - MESSENGER/CROWN'COACH V. G.tober 8, 1986 Page $ B. Design Review Committees. The Committee has reviewad the project and has recommended that the project be improved with the following conditions: 1. Site Plan: a. The Committee determined that the loading dock could be located on the west side of the building due to: o The finished grade established by the existing building, o The natural slope of the land from north to f. o south, and o The nature of the assemblying operation. However, it shall be screened with a combination of decorative block wail, mounding, and landscaping from Vineyard Avenue. The length of Aft the screen wall shall be determined by the City a 4 Planner. b. The existing site drea should be upgraded,as much" as possible, to conform to current City's. Codes. Only one driveway access should' be allowed on a* Vineyard Avenue and Arrow Highway, The existing driveway on Vineyard Avenue across from the proposed loading' dock should' be eliminated. Two of the three existing ,driveways on Arrow Highway should be eliminated and redesign the driveway access as'shown in Exhibit "K". c. Straight sidewalk should provided along Vineyard Avenue. d'. The existing concrete wall should be continued along the entire length of the project on Vineyard Avenue. e. The developer should fully improve the driveway u_rcess to 9th Street. f. A six-foot wide landscape planter or a continuous six to eight foot high block wall should be provided along the entire length of the existing and the proposed building (east elevation), for screening the outdoor storage of finished vehicles as shown in Exhibits "E" and "H". . . PLANNING COIOJISSYON STAFF REPORT ' CUP 86.45 - MESSENGER/CROWN COACH October' 8, 1986 Page 4 g. Employee outdoor eating arfa or plaza area should be provided on the nortrr side of the existing building. h. A uniform design of fencing materials (block wail ; wrought-iron and security' gates) shoul6 b provided. The existing chain-link fence and barbed wire should be replaced with wrought-iron materials. 2. Elevations: a. The existing building should be upgraded with re- painting the building, replacing any broken windows, providing roof screen in screening all roof-mounted equipments. b. The exposed footing of the new building locatei t the west and south elevations should be cove with materials consistent with the arch*tecture --.G the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. LandscaEina;: a. All existing trees should rbe saved by remaining in place or relocated _to a mol-e suitable area. b. A six-foot wide lar1scaped planter should be provided along, the east property boundary for the entire length of the parking area: as shown on Exhibits "E" and "H". c. Special landscaping treatments such as increased number" of trees and shrubs should be provided. within the setback area along Arrow Highway per City requirements: d. The double rota of specimen size 'trees should be continued along the setback area of 'lineyard Avenue, to be consistent wits, the existing po�,tions of the site. C. Grading Committees The Grading Committee has reviewed the proposed grading pan and was concerned with the 9 foot to 12 foot high retaining walls along the eastern property boundary as shown an Exhibits "F" and "G". Current standards allow a maximum of 4 foot high retaining wall O th a maximum wall height of 9 feet including the four, feet retaining portion. The Cortmittee recommended that the developer mitigate the aesthetic and visual impacts of the retaining wails by providing terraced planters as shown in Exhibit "G". This PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF"REPORT .,_'CUP 86-15 - MESSENGER/CROWN COACH October B, 1986 Pass 5 mitigation treasure lqufres coaperation frt,% the ad,fdcent property owner or;developer. '','Since the adjacent property Diener and developer is the mama one as. this project,., a Condition -?f Approval requiring terraced planters along the west property boundary for Develtpment Review B6-33 has been placed in a separate Resolution for the JV modification request for this approved Master Plan, D. Environmental Assessment: Staff has completed the Environmental MR0 ist an r. s e erm5ad that the development of this project may expose people or property to water-related hazards such as flooding. However, a drainage study has been required to be submitted to the,City for review in order tc.determine the mitigation meas.tres for alleviating the potential ProblEm of flooding do-site to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Therefore, staff has determined that there will not be significant impact in case because Vie mitigation measure as recommended has been added to the Conditions of Approval. If the Planning Commission concurs with these findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate, Iii. FACTS FOR FINDINGS; This project is consistent with the General Plan and tie Industrial Specific Plan in that: the site plan and huildirr_design f with the added conditions provide .for a safe working eai;;x-vRment; the proposed use promotes employment opportunities as an integral part of a balanced community. In addition, the proposed use, building design;, site j plan, together with the recommended Conditions of, Approval are in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of tke Development !„ode j and Specific Flan. The proposed use, together with conditions appli able thereto, would not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. IV'. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Daily RRepo�rt newspaper andpublic hearing notices were sent to all prep'"' er`-'tles`witt in 300 ieet of the project site.. Y. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission consider all input regarding this project, If the Comm;ssion concurs with the findings, then issuance of a Negative Declaration and approval of Conditional Use Rzrnit 86-I5 and modification to Development Review 86-13 would be appropriate. Res fully s 'tted Brad Bui�W� City Planner oc:Nrcka A— PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPdT CUP 86-15 - MESSENGER/CROWN COJP { October 8, 1986 Page 6 i1 a if n ,r Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location.Map Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "C" - Approved Master Plan for DR 86-13 Exhibit,."D" � Modification to Phase III of -the Master P1ai{'for OR 86-13 Exhibit "E" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "F" -'Conceptual Grading Plan ' Exh.ibit "G" - Terraced Planters Along East Property Boundary;-{ Exhibit "H'I Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "I" Elevations Exhibit "J" - Location of New Driveway on Vineyard Avenue Exhibit "K" - Redesign of New Driveway on Arrow Highway ! � Exhibit "L" - Detail of Off-Site Improvement at the intersection of Arrow Highway and Vineyard Avenue Resolution of Approval with Standard Conditions for CUP 86-15 ' Resolution of Approval for DR 86-13 Modification 4 rr 7� } M� MESSENGER 1NVESTMENTSOMPANY � i `September 23, 1986 Planning Commission Members City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 C Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 RE: 89ta1 Arrow Route, Rancho Cucamonga ' ar Dear Planning Ciamtission Members. Lew Werner, Chairman of Crown Coach International' has F, advised us this afternoon that he and the Presider':t will be unable to attend the scheduled Planning Commission'" Meeting Wednesday, September 24, 198, ind is requesting a continuation of the Planning Commission Meeting to October a, 1986.. We are sorry for any inconvenience this may cause. d; ` Sincerely, Dana. S. S'anders Vice`Pre' ,,dent Souther. -California Commercial Development DSS1c1 cc: Jack Lam Brad Buller Nancy Fong Bill Messenger, Jr. t I r 1 16912-A Von Kerman Avenue,Irvine,CA 92771 ;714i-j74-1300 t Crown Coach International September, 19.;; 1,985 City of Rancho- Cucamonga Planning Commission ' 93.20-0 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 µ Dear Commission Members: RE: Conditional Use Permit/Development Approval ' for Crown Coach International a6• 15 OIL behalf of Crown Coach International and Messenger Investment Company, we have discussed the Preliminary Design 1 Review Comments dated August 17, 1986 regarding the above- r eferenced project. , k` Fro:i the onset, it has been the intent crf Crown Coach p International to occupy the existing facility at 8901 Arrow Route in its present state, with an addition to the south end We will be able to improve Arrow Highway to of the facility, its ultimate width by expanding the current roadway four w additional feet as well as installing an`employee drive approach off of 9th Street which will give access to the parking lot. All other Items discussed in the letter dated August 17, 1986 prepared by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning .- Department Staff are notable to be installed due to 1) :;bperational constraints i.e., locatnn�of'1oac� ng;doc2 „or:; 2) an-Impact tp t-he-•e-conomi -s-both .Ori df'716a relocation tiao finis In summary, it is the intent of Crown Coach International to occupy this facility and bring an additional employment base to the City of 450 employes. We look forward to being an asset to the city of Rancho Cucamonga. Sincererly, Llewellyn C. Werner William S. Messenger, Jr. Chairman of the Board President Crown Coach International Messenger Investment Co. WSM/jbt a a EA 2 Ut .O'✓���t`.r'="mac f�.i'-"'r i..�=�?'i���r rr^. ati q o'"..� �.-,,,,N.'.�' AR subarea 1 : r ' MFeron AT 0 �> r. • l i" NORTH CITY OF ULNA, RANTCHO CUCAMONGA VMNIgDSLY mta HrVtf S ��p�W e� 3{ �YIT� Mrs 1 nrvtsaacw L. 13• 5 � __ -- �• t ��4RDIMD t k ll ew4Dwo aunt acov. ttt.oa t ,' 'i.l �� a ecoa NORTH CITY OF rrEM: RANCHO CUCAMONGA Tlr E:-fa / :arov(, PLANNING L}7VMON EXl-IlBrr SCALE v . 1 I TV Eb 55 �7 z qg�d 9 8. g $ 5 .c 15F Eg aF I § � bC.. i 9� ! 's ''�� �1 �( •f t e i t tit"t t r t � � ma ji a ^;D' >w go a "g 3 i ` !L W G 8 y i! 3nH3AY GUYAW E� ;r z - C _ _ i SS 0 ✓Olnp JYaa �y��� � i x t f 1�. _— Y ' "�T � R i��`..� cam— �ia-= ___.��•..I 030 ,It Z c m a I uj yy 9 y 3 u W Rt, \— t '-11N3A5 atldA3NIA----�--- . ui¢ ¢ g s$ x9y 3 $� ' l— i VILLA MIRAGE PPoOPOSEO HOUSING 1 . RO an mnnrua IglW+�is G �,y}p��df/ �� /� PROPOSED AUiO. �_ � ' .� • U ��. SELf-SER �'• a!sfenaNJ ��� o.rKa.rn.,., °u" ���r l , EXISTING UILO e y .n.l4�+arwQ , R //^ J,��f ��.�//py , 11 b/7JI j•bi ry PROP SEO MU E I G6'l�6f'MHoa$ TEN GS .xa PROJECT DATA un.ra sµar:aa•. fwa a,.,,uv, � aaovnrwu -r,via v. rmeYs. auwai.nar.uuruoew i II m'�°° aae a,xoas. rxaar.xer+uu,,eeu vl t ruaaa xowco _ /,+g I rL rNrxO aµ ROrLLtt4UQplwxy PFO - �Mf7.d rtoru Yrass nmrcw WAR I aww,u,y euroua. '. EHOUSE FACILITY � 1 I{/I • .nuo:wrecaum SITE PLAN � .rJ tillYssae4 CROWN COX H MANUFACTURING ASSEMBLY FACILITY ram* j RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA �, AEG->r5 C6�J,olwl�y r�lll►fZRo NORTH CITY OF UEMD t RANcH-p Ct..IcAMQINTGA PLANNING DrVUoN SCAN�: o fF x645 �: •l. W{Sl ifCT,on Awl. t c\ I k 1 - it lir f EX4SYING 6lfILD{NG a t • Fc ca,u,n. Ne Lu.. v� � '7� icrnoe c.c ..I[.L`fC]LN000CX c t waoR NEW FJSP,ANSION, (P. FFSc,.s IF. . Lu � 1 { �• y kl t t t { ! J — c+unllHrslct 1t .c. NIN7,i 4TRGtT - NORTH CITY OF �Tt: P. •• f RANCHO CJCAMGNGA TrriE P .ANNv''r'G DI JISION EXHMrr=,_. FAVI 7dP DF CUR& Z35-G -ro 37•a T5 ATCTION 6-B /iGPAd S-/7 r�d9Jxou.O�A� 6' bt►DtkPi tnlrnY u1Prfd' A yR g,c WWI .29 18 ��`Ir[� ir�l.�F ,�F2eFNERs NORTH CITY OF ITEM- F fAK n tNT O CUCAMONGA TITLE. PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT-_ SCALE: yr, t i V 'LA)MRAGE ROOPOSM HOUSING - Cry i p, Axnvw ROUTET S fa—ft I:cGeR•r�s tss. 6* EXISTING WILDING i NEW Pv EX!IANSIO W 'tY•6 wTF.v � � ,sv wa N, I �Es2 L/bo► 5 i , �✓ryrnvc v rty PL L�1r Z11!lJLJt�J� a ='1 L CROWN COACH MANUFACTURING ; ASSEMBLY FACILITY RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA NORM CITY OF ITEM: -t RANCHO CUCAlV1ONGA PLANNII\'G DI6 3SION EY&IIBIT _ gam: a O a s p ppah'jyy�'J F t At 21, ♦,.►- i• ':��,re rrv�tif ya r,,F a7 i�.v +�`' PY loll +.is;�� � ��i,�,.,•�ry' ,,� �ice. + R i � r 4 ` y 7c�iOEco Also l --- — ARROW ROUTE �� Y 4,000a,-n* -74 EXISTING RETAINING r ! WALL ccli NEW SIDEWALK 70=01'WIDE CITY 1 OF WALK f 52 1 + �On OFFICE MEZZANINE EXIS77N L OADI?G D. EXISTIN k L VEL DRIVE-INIOR _ r +�. EXiaTING BUILDING y25 MET CANO= } ' I yr• .� NORTH CTT'Y OF ITEIvr: P.NTCHO C.TCAMONGA�A Tflu:�G PLAIT M DIV qON EXHIBIT- SCALE pr c .. ARROW ROUTE C� EXISTING RETAINING 14r WALL NEW SIDEWALK 10'-WWIDE CITY RIGHT OF WALKSID -/ TYP p 352, z 'e `o OFFICE MEZZANINE EXISTIY ADlr �, - EXiSTIN ALL GROUND WEL DRRIE-Ltd DOOR {; EXISTING BUILDING a� NORTH CITY OF 1 /�1TE�1� RAN-CHO CUC'.A.MONTGA Tom: Y ' ek a PLANNING DIVjS 4 RX,iBIT._ SCALE:�� M _ 12 -2f .� •� t t Near Plauferr.amd wall cles;om ot-,40 sabjed 7-0 1kd plural 1 c?�tJflvAYdE LT f' the � � �.rt�jf lafo�Y1NPY'� i f NORTH I CITY OF RANCHO rGA 1TE.1rI� 30 r ��`1�C,r 'TITLE:- T 215€ �F vbn �`itrPi�Csttl RESOLUTION NO. 'l A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 86-15 FOR THE MOTORHOMEJBUS ASSEMBLY BUSINESS AND THE 83,00-. SQUARE FOOT 'EXPANSION TO THE EXISTING `,INDUSTRIAL BUILDING a. LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW HIGHWAY AND VINEYARD AVENUE IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL/RAIL SERVED DISTRICT (SUBAREA 2) OF THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN WHEREAS, on the 24th day of August, 1986, a complete application was filed by Messenger Investment Company for review of the above-described project, and WHEREAS, on the 24th day of September, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public ,hearing to consider the above-described project and continued to October 8, 1986 regular meeting at the request of the applicant; and WHEREAS, on the 8th day of 1'.-tober, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hel;_ a public hearing to consider the above-described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Comiaission resolved as l follows: SECTION: 1 That the fv fl owi Uag findings can be met: F r 1. That the proposed use with the added conditions is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Industrial Specific Plan an"' the purposes of the district in which the site is locate, and that: a. It provides a pleasant, attractive and safe working environment. b. It promotes employment opportunities as an integral part of a balanced community. c. The site plan has decreased the non-conformity of the existing facility to comply with the current Development Standards. 2. That the proposed use, togather with the conditions applicable thereto, would not be detrymental to the public health, safety.._ or welfare, or materially injurious to properties ar ; Improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the site is suitable and adequate for the proposed use in &,velopment. f PLANNING C01414ISSION RESOLUTION NO, CUP 86-15 - MESSENGERICROWN COACH October 8, 1986' F Page 2 4, That the proposed use will not have a substantial adverse "economic effect on the nearby uses. 5. That the proposed use complies wi—i. each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan and the Development Code. SECTION 2: That this project, tcgether with mitigation measures a included 1n t e and tions of Approval, will not create adverse impact on the t' environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on October 8, 1986. r. SECTION 3: That Conditio;ial L'se Permit 86-15 is approved subject to the following con itions; Planning Division: I, The proposed loading dock shall be screened with a combination of decorative block wall, mounding and landscaping from Vineyard Avenue. The length of .this screen wall along Vineyard Avenue shall be determined, by the City Planner. Plans shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building oermits. 2. The existing driveway an Vineyard Avenua across from the proposed loading dock shall be eliminated. Only one driveway access shall be allowed on Viiieyar3 Avenue. I 3. Only one driveway access on Arrow Highway shall be allowed. Two of the three existing driveways shall be eliminated. The final desi,:n of the most easterly driveway access shall be ubmitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Straight sidewalk shall be provided along Vineyard Avenue. S. The existing concrete wali shall be continued along the entire length of,the project on Vineyard Avenue. 6. The developer shall fully improve the driveway access and providing landscaping along this driveway access to 9th Street. 7. A six-foot wide landscape planter or a continuous six-foot to eight-foot high block wall shall be provided along the east property boundary. The entire length of this landscape planter or block wall shall be from t.a existing building south to the end of the proposed buiMng (east elevation), 8. Employee outdoor eating area or plaza area shall be provided on the north side of the existing building. Detailed plans shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Planner. A g r PLANNING COMMISSION" RESOLUTION NO. CUP 86-15 - MESSENGER/CROWD COACH October S. 1985 Page 3 Aft 9. A uniform design of fencing materials (block wall wrought-iron and security gates) shall be submitted for City garner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. The existing chain link fence and barbed wire shall be removed and replaced with the approved design of the fencing materia'.s. 10. 1.,e existing facility shall to upgradg,;l with re-painting the building, replacing broken windows and providing roof screens to screen all roof-mounted equipments. Detailed plans for roof k s�-rEens shall be submitted for rity Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building,.permits. The exposed footing of the new building located at the west and south elevations shall be covered with materials consistent with the architecture to the satisfaction of the City'Ptapne_r,_ 12. Special landscaping treatment such as mounding, increased number of trees, shrubs and, the size of thin trees shall be provided to the east elevation and zouth elevation of the new buildiinq.to mitigate the visual impact of the exposed footing` of the building. 13. All existing trees -epall be saved in place or relocated to a suitable area. Decaying or diseased trees shall be replaced with specimen size` trees. A_ny rzmoval, replacemeiit or relocation shall require review and approval of a Tree Removal Permit prior to issuance of grading permits. 14, A six-foot wide landscaped planter shall oo provided, along the east property boundary for the entire length of the parking area as shown in Exhibit "H". 15. Special landscape treatments such .as increased number of trees arv� shrubs, increased size of trees shall be provided within the setback area along Arrow Highway per City requirements. 15. The double row of specimen size Plum trees shall be continued along the setback area of Vineyard Avenue.. 17. A continuous hedgerow to screen parking area that fronts on Vineyard Avenue and along south property boundary shall be provided. 18. The developer, applicant or the property owner shall work with the adjacent property owner, developer or applicant in mitigating the adverse visual impact of nine feat to twelve feet r. high retaining wall by providing terraced type olanter',_as sho_'.n P in Exhibit "G". Detailed plans shall be submitted to the Planning Division for raview and approval prior to issuance of Aft grading permits. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 86-15 -. MESSENGERICROWN GOACN, October 8, 1986 c Page 4 a Engineering Division: �'. Existing Overhead Utilities:.; a. Vineyard Avenue - The existing , overhead uti ities electrical except for the 66KV electrical) on the prpiect side of Vineyard Avenue shall-be undergrounded from the first i. pole on the north side of Arrow Route to the first pole south of the project boundary, prio *. to public improvement acceptance or occupancy" . whichever occurs first. Reimbursement of one- half of the adopted cost of undergrounding from future development as it<ioccurs on the opposite of the streeV is feasible from the presently undeveloped properties (;ninor portion). b. Arrow Route - Aa'in-lie4,fee as contribution to +fie futuFF undergroundi:tg of the existing overhead utilities (te'l ecorinuni cati on and electrical), on the opposite slide of Arrow Route shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fees shall be one- half of the adopted unit amount times the ` length from the center of Vineyard Avenue to the east property boundary (564 feet). C. The existing service to the existiny-!building crossing ArrvW Route shall be undergrounded, from the north side of Arrow Route to the building prior to acceptance of public improvements or occupacy whichever occurs first. 2. The primary 'access to the site 'shalI be from 9th Street. Reciprocal access easement shalt be required prior to i:,sauace of building permits. 3. Driveways on Vineyard Avenue: a. Reconstruct the southerly driveway to City Standards (minimum 35 feet in width) including a right-turn pocket (deceleration lane) and post for a no left-turn onto Vineyard Avenue. b. Remove the northerly driveway and replace it with curb, gutter and sidewalk to city Standards. c. Provide striping for back-to-back left-tarn pockets for the new driveway and the existing one to the north on the west side of Vineyard Avenue. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, CUP 86-15 - MESSENGER/CROWN COACH October 8, 1986 Page 5 4. Driveways on Arrow Route: a. Remove the entire circular driveway including the parking stalls and replace with Wrb, gutter,;sidewalk and 3endscaping. r b. Reconstruct the easterly driveway to City Standards (minimum 35<feet in width). 5. - The curb return at the southeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and Arrow Route-shall be reconstructed in accordance with Exhibit r "L". The developer shall bear the cost of relocating the F traffic signal required by the reconstruction. 6. A temporary drainaae.swale from tb,, ' -utheast corner of the site to the northeast corner of 9th S' i and Vineyard Avenue or an alternative drainage solution 6z „;droved by the City Engineer shall be constructed prior to occupancy. A drainage easement r- shall be obtained to issuance of a building permit. 7. The sidewalk along Yineyard Avenue shall be 12 feet wide from the existing 12-foot wide sidewalk to the southerly property boundary. 8. A lot line adjustment shall be completed prior to issuance of a ? building permit to extend the southerly property line more to the south to include the entire 'property to be used for the parking lot within the project parcel lines. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSIONOF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST' Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary 1, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing 'Resolution was duly .and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of October, 1986_ by the following vote-to-wit: AYES:. COAMISSIONERSc NOES: COMMISSIONERSt ABSENT: COWSSIONERSt { RESOLUTION No. F A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPRnVING MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT REVfEW 86-13 REGARDING PHASE III OF THE FASTER PLAN LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNEROF 9TH STREET AND VINEYARD AVENUE IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIALfRAIL SERVED DISTRICT (SUBAREA 2)` OF THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC ,PLAN WHEREAS, on the 29th day of August, 1986, a complete application was filed by Messenger Investment Company for the review of the above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 24th day-,of September, 1986, the-Rancho,Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above-described project and continued to October 8, 1986 regular meeting at the request of the applicant; and WHEREAS, on the 3th day, of October, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above-described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Commission resolved as follows:, SECTION 1_: That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed modification to Phase I'II of the Master Plan is consistent with the objectives or the General Plan; and, 2. That the proposed use is in accord with ne objectives of the Industrial Specific Plan and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and, 3. That the proposed modification to the Phase III of the Master Plan is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions .of the Development Code; and, 4. That the proposed use, together with conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public healthy, safety or welfare, or, materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environmenta an that a Negative Declaration has been issued for the Master Plan (DR 86-13) on July 23, .1986. SECTION 3: That Development Review 86-13 modification is approved subject to tie -oTtowing conditions and attached Standard Conditions: i ti PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 86-13 - MODIFICATION - MESSENGER, , w October 8, 1986 i Page 2' i Plann;n2l9ivision: 1. The =i;opoped Phase I1/ development are approving concept only. development etzil be subject to Development/Design Review process for Planning Commission approval. ,. 2. All conditions contatied within Resolution 86-110 shall apply. 3. The 'developer, !applicant, or the property, owner shall vic k with w the adjacent property owner, develo er or applicant in P P Y P , mitigating the adverse visual impact of the nine fool: to. twelve foot high retaining wall by p o%,iding terraced type of planters ` as shown in Exhibit 'W1 of CUP 80-15. Detailed plans shal1 be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to issuance 'of grading permits for Phase II development of DR , L5-13. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF OCT09ER, 1986. PLANNINS COMMISSION OF THE CIT'f OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Ank ennis L. Stout, airman - ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy ecre ary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secreevy of the planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed and adopted,by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of'the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of October, 1986, by the following Y,•we-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS; i i i - a a. �o r a :..® g w :rg 9 n '»b g'►IEi d l� H n O b JS p O. T A.d �m-• pp r n i »n 2 n ny 3.� t�' OONb Y:Nb 9Nw - n» 2 ^ b O t -wo r» .gin c N o �. K I �n l y i n� ' � C tr l ry r • S C iz Or bones � trr eun o ..ao v. c 14 •C13 "`<l 1 O I, _ aalocV e -Er ��n I' scm� o �ztrn �av nry w v_a Nina o n 2 a n» ^ 3>c t �NNa o O•np3 pin $n dnr •."S•,n.a pr Y S Tb r ps n:5 c�� r.o n'" ec r,•c v� nub»v� Ayl^N +.moo n o w tr nnioa ao� n l nyv lr 3Oo3 S 6 3 0 l A �• Win" Sm -�n q,tryay'n v Tom», wn n nl. n no.t c 'r w ..lid n n=N v_'vm oq�an. n»n noon b' lob l Y b c nff ^� non oT rt. -nnv nl�qo a,• o�ow "nn n='n c�3 e� aw»moo 0a^<�3o»w� u vim »n tr'v �10 nn� eow3a �^1.r� ^�tr nol"n � L ;NO.mx Il'tr6^ V tr l ie s 6 _'_N �, v �e ow�.�n vnnrntr y' io � '6663i" r lon• o lf1 °ln 9 �,{ n nN�r p10'� Cw�»1 • n 6w . �� O C •C r r 1 6 M g 4 w l�n n.9a °ida� 3Sn dw vnf ny. vw.:�a i~Otf00 ^Ap �.O 0�6.d 'C AC � X 4.^ A O n aR ppg'O »^T (rq�3 TS 3�1 IsA A Q V0. �_�;,. G.p �D•b� IN 'i NC,t t nnay, gd �Oy<3..0 -,��b v 2 aba'.4 ✓_ .rOm i n 6�b> 6�p.O C.A d�.q 1 y 7 2 6 .� S o3A O a Q6 n bb 4 S r•� P C O< b <.9,. A a 03 irR= Am7 A O r OpS a'3 f..NL NA.>� 6 O.ys3 esc A a aA.w.o Sad' t 'a at� w:a if- SR S+gyp N SY 6p�`. N n;r 3.r. t^ Ab 1 G^= m:y 3' m eA ao C d w Y. 0 N.T , F QRryo ^� .r3 ��CA O,SCR 3C :b6 A of0 ion N od s=M. uo vq �. 1D. nioi o". vii m� n ai>.J 3..r �a a.� N ryry b 7 C O` ttpp aA=,; IS^A 9b S GS �M -�du 09 Olpap�~ R�.'r.Q tieAe. r4�N L;� y�v•fI E F.^?n.. sn vadj oJ. ® TSW O n� nv Ra'c s >•o.c ?d �rt d a,6�m a n a b 3 n 4 .� o+ 90G Z Sn NA �Ya �3> O' > (� rg all I -Cainv �=�. 4 N AC 01.00 O 4 A�3.. R qO�A a^N�R. n^�� A�WA y��_ AIp R 4 p ��Rtn buff lbd�w0 rN�A ORnv. Ng �A�N O,b O•d 3 n ^ r„ c' a q F � GO^.0 aaY•i N 'visa voy S OA p� o A n C y r O 9.-•Y �N ./ ['1 R= •c a- <w >® n 3 S� _Q 3 n� - a1 bN• V '- NG.fbi. ONAO Z n� �b .n+ 6�D. h A O.d O. Oro3b Cw "� M >� .41:-zef n Ai ON da C r • n ISG �q N �a�c aso�a± sA`7c �' c'n".o'n S pp � OC 00 6 ^O' ' SvaS6 a�.'yn 1Ap>D, �Rba 9`r:=� A4 =O;.(�c��^. a C •A t S r o C» OCC_,o ro Mn�.b.y b-p��alYYn�T AV9'rC ,rnY.a'YrS patsn SSA mpt E— •9N+.. NO ramp s tr w to�a�nn:n sv ca o:�'r,N., s cv„•— an'i +S•rb } •w n� QI�i. G'n r �br 63. nPN> r EE pSZ Stp+O Q n Z.T. � 0 11Qf ^a n^ N •1 amp Oa b •f�a 19 .1. _. p O O v Flo cam norm ,o• n p .. o Qro nn.ts.. vp:o ne m8pn i. n la.m nna nm' l. ' N+G..9 O O�_ M n 3 r� O r`<10 C N.�.• S N-1�N= ax y r N y. N� s oN v N n� ^L ..,— n p^ v> �p1>o ?j a .�. o � oac`<. =N unn v �O3 R taw >JOAprP Np a vjM ^ A n , 6K a''1 N=OR P,O ' L . O xr.� O '- > G Ic r.. n ac.N q� _ n� 'm -o. n vo• > V ffpp s,•o o_. ov r. Z O>b. p y n P>Y >O. N i M O K 6 r 19 S ;C N T ate. 6N rn. a • 3 > 'n vl �. S � NOrO 7n Oy, R� pQ0 6 r I AWL of S t 4 G R 71 G >K V r. ro o- -n. 1 ANC OQ 7• vac .. mrn _o n_.. r xz ono 10 O{p T> OrtC M1� A'.11�T Sb: nj A Lt tO ;n�A i t ` m :o N 4d\\ 9 Ogg rt� lR4Y y _ 9 dtr 'lei 4h n GC a7 NV,b N.. �.�.-W!" A. ns b3G,0 Sn bW3� b3�r. y RSN. t O^TII.. art It ifA', +iA A^ bS3 �.7 tie..+0 > a A "` h wL ,Lt.+S� .n Y tr:a*GiipD^'N a NbdV 6W�a ^ Aww 3 N LL p7. y broA b0 ��a N3 O�y A4 f4".,f � Aq� tr H.b`a AAN wa 6 03 N�q dd•e YN y � LL pa nb m 4 ro a C Z S eAt Y w b�T: -tU ti e.b n .., ro ro s i O e< b •. R�.C'1 NRVi �. Q�a aj�y N9 TV�1� N w.0.roy N N� p' 6.Y jp�0 A IF rytie+.0 CiY� .. GA. �yt �30. gi A.�.ah y� a ix R3� A — its„„ 3 w.t rN be+o O�'•OC:�C p•p 1 N4 H QN j�l N N1q O.A ^� Rb' �N� �� � ry�3' V � 'nb•.. •t�O'. ,W� a0 Aa1t .fib ( tA.AN � :e...�8�. »OA �$,4 y��.� N z R d5 W@ n+'b a.4r OW N "'. A o R <q.,t. c. 'Aa a9 ^ � ev •t ant n ,� c a Hw mn:R Pio�" m.;t.a fin• M.« der�.: 6� Os3 50 -Cj'ONX ¢�.7q �S, •Qj. e A`N T O fL.• a d qN I M1 v a N no S..1.C.,ip� c YA yaay sA n�o b b bCn Yitrnn-t C O.b y ��. �ibn G W ��npY VIR� ~ q..1 ti. fbe• bbQ ymS?13 ��' A�C-n+p A D ti t? � y�Z 1p. OV+p �a;�� O.J N a AAgRN m �♦ n pa'A»A 9.01 sA A t atl3^' 'tf.aAOM N pp �°iN oT J yf7 hro�.o.� A�V'NNb tgg ? tP NC+% b e.OA 64Cro nb O,t z Z n1 R 33 A A A lei W tr C AC Y. cg rt � yu j io Q`b ro NW ^r NNA%O 90.19 wb mA9tf m NnN e..��'46 aRry Ny 6 NA�.S J a^ n• �aOati n3o � ~ wRJ• O. d^d OR^. � 6P� � aaS A N.0 Rye. C'A G AY Ra. �..r,Q3 S'dTT N.N G O R4� ��YfO 4�a A'�tj r, 'pia yirN mn. Gaeta z wc,_, _;•••". .h.^•a ^tr trb p•s o� +QA3. Vrntr i C�� Svn* 3,nA0 ,,.�n. z= ^y trKa'c, n 'cam oNz v� ^ � aa' y wN.'+... o •:m� rocoQ QaK wc.�. was i pr rVa P .& LN rJu .W N n O. a Sr O hb} 2 eT7 Y Zrb CC'� bC za G, a. q Y bqp K c O 4� Qp«� bab YQ4 qn� »t3� ^�.n4` ?n. ~9W.4..r N�p3 qpN rO ` �rN 6T n .C...Ri. �N h MC �b� ^ d 7.y qq— Q� V C rp fib 15 p O3 Il per=. n r A N�Pp•h gn .�r'h�• �.�.�.1 /�N�, N ,�. �d. � Cam. �.Sb� Kp �N 40 y9 a. �>. vo•b.^? ;4'a'nmo�'°. ea �-°i• O Pcn. saq c? Kd eb ^ p r W;b Gam. tij Gam. uqlh S m 3 b p� y4 1 4 A y n 111 e. G�i ap y o �� r ' �i6 —To i q n M�.P p 9 ► � 4 p• A A H =A d 3 ?4Y.^4l� �m j _ w A y n ggsf d p n go- aft M. gy... g p A 8 M. p a a 3d s$ ^ A �••` +•p,.. -A �, Ate. sma. nn a� AnaN a. �v 3 S 4 g H c q p ONZN b. 4 H r A lbN SDW a�B ^pj�1 f�J � .. 1 �pN � R N y� IX O»1.w. n.+^rf O Ate^ yy Ra O Vi 1 A, Na Y� - N R O �, 3c, M•.n N, %vAah pa; v^a. iei a 7.�N v'ri p.. wih r A i. ng a` �.;Z roi. i'o y r`3— ,.N P77 . +n O C }j yap ` h 0. ,.=w �n ♦�i.. O� 4� aw,.Y are e- _ Nan tea- 6fi^ ttttaSSSS2 KO Win. �C 3 a i a F e'en. Ccn yw. pn 6e^r i.' 7 P ^ ntn ^n`� ... .. ��. '�� �,nc n� na —T .. � S.S. \4 nO T Cy 0. C G wOae St a0 v n9 ip^d O'er 'o ^a ^ip. in `Q.c en�`� n'� �. T^ z o�em Or h R'c� iN. On•co. Soaa .aj cJ Y rr o m �^ �,. «N cc ad aon 'mow Nr onn nY Rorya^ L'7 r rt N Vy �y, axtl O p� � G A p0`yn' Gip O iae^� 0= oa�.n 5 AAi RWY D 01 6 N 1SOu Ab. 1 n.D f o wn Kt0wr0 K.w 3a AY. �, — ca n.RH •• n a a $ e aQ$ o c.a+ w'.m 'Qoi•'w' R A 66R D1 A ry 4��n `l; Np"? 9 Q • I I I I L I B �� LR1\ � � O>w Cn� «Z Si �9nn Y »A w�.rr +MQ ��..�_ _✓� � ^ n 'n r r wa ��ws .�� M.N�m 1ns= I r n ct'o: _pp - � ;n k,,Gw cfl� o..a ra na.. s- ro i Si c N� e. 'b n a � ., ate: �t A�o v1�•. ��. �A r_' �c� >.. �[� a,o ac en,ny,. cr'o ;.N. >j "sa gg- wM� >"p'o.. �o ..n naN,w s".n..i n.Jd•w w o. C1 o.« C+yam wT ...� as o• +.n,w s �.Sw W.S l mow. a>• �.r >�... _ ^ _�� w is.. j�.r>n nv> ";ate .: pig o�2'M I o^ tea„ ros �6 n a fi t c w ..S ago > ct a`, $^.�5. io n'n «> f O m z 0 r' i 71 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIIONGA °Lcntirai, STAFF REPORT a OM Q F Z DATE: October 8, 1986 1977 TO: Chairman acid Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Warren, Associate Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT - SCHLOSS?R FORGE - AMENDMENT NO. 1 - An Amendment extending the term from twenty-five years to forty years for a Development Agreement between the City of Rancho: Cucamonga and Philip D. SchlessM Elaine M. Schlosser, Albert Holquin, Jr., Roberta'J. Halquin, Jeffrey P. Schlosser, Jacquelin L. Schlosser, David M. Richardson and Gene M. Richardson, regarding the future development and current operations of the industrial P` facility on 27.7 acres at the southwest corner of Arrow Routs and Rochester Avenue - AFN 229-111-05, 17 and 18. - t I. BACKGROUND: On August 20, 19Foj., the City council approved the 1st. reading for the Schlosser Fors Development Agreement. At the Council hearing, one major item of discussion was the. term of the Agreement. The City Ccuncil believed._ it would be appropriate to consider a 40-year agreement rather than the recommended 25•-year term. Rather than delaying the Agreement, the Council decided to -approve the Agreement as drafted, but-requested the Planning Commission to consider an Amendment extending the term of the Agreement to 40 years. The Amendment has been reviewed by the property owners and they are in favor df its implementation.- II. ANALYSIS The nature of the Agreement does not change, except as it may be affected by the term of the Agreement. The City Council indicated that a term extensian might be appropriate due to the long period of time necessary to amortize the specialized heavy equipment of i'ne Forge facility. Staff can only speculate on the consequences of extending the Agreement an additional 15 years. As time passes, the policies and development standards of the City can go through substantial changes, with the degree of change amplified over longer periods of time. The longer the period, the greater the potential for significant differences between present and future 4evelopment standards. 1 ITEM B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SCHLOSSER FORGE AMENDMENT NO. 1 October 8, 1986 Page 2 III. RECOt1MENDATION: l Stzff recommends that the Planning Commission effects,( analyze what if any, the Amendment would have on their 11 original evaiva'lIon of the Agreen`:nt. If the Planning .Commission Ii believes that the extension of term would r: t have any substantial effect on the purposes of the Agreement, i&-Would be appropriate to recommend approval of the Amendment to the City Council. Res tfully s `tted, Brad Bu4fr City Planner ,} BB:A''ic%o Attachments: Amendment No. 1 to t6.Schlosser Development Agreement x Edward Hobson Letter ov'September 11,, 1986 Ordinance ,4 Adak u; i r 4 C COVINGTON &'r C' Room r„�•..^.---- f � —UP,CE G.COVINGTON ATTORNEYS AtT LAW MAROLO A.BAL,H 1131 WEST SIXTH' 3TPEET TELCPHGNE SAMtJE,CROWS POST ODPICE dr—)jX Is15. IT4l tla]-o]o] GEOAGE W.PORTER f ROBERT E.OOUGHERTY oNTARIO, CALIFORNIA 91762 I OONALO G.HAS.AH 11 ROBERT P.SCHAUER tOWARO A.MOPSCjH �}Itt �,ANTHOMY SMITH n p [[[ STEPHEN R„WAGESeptember 11, 1986 l 4ME R.ANDERSON �JonvrA PERRI R,\NORM,J.P TAE R GCE l V C D r..., ",iTER M dA,iHAC16 1 TRACY TIBBA^. CITY OF mANCHO CUCA;;joNGA OCRSHEI" rr.G MES r PLANNINMI t)IYISION i 6NEILA F1,JANES MELANIE KIECH.. Sty 12 1986, A&? PM c 7$JlUUkltip3;ElI i :' City of Ra.icho Cucamonga Community development i K Planning Division 1. P.O. BOX 807 J' � Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 -- Attention: Otto KrOutil,j Senior Planner I Re, ,Amendment No. 1 to Schlosser Forge Development'kgreement - Dear Otto: Schloe7-er Forge is in favor of .Amendment No. I to extend the life Of the .Agreement from its current term to 40 years. 1 Please confirm that the reoommendatirn of the Amendment has beon. placed on the Planning Commission Agenda for October 8,'and we will ensure that someone from out office will be there. Re pectfully, r , COVINGTON,CROWE Edward Iopson '✓ EA$/js cc: Mr. Phil Schlosser Ms. Chris Dempsey Mr. John U. Gall GLCAATO C CITE' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA z. >f M10-Jeffrey Kin& r� G � z �i Gex'JntenMn I ~ _ > C!ales J.Bq net.II 1977 9 Jon 13.MHmis Richard M.rwi Pamela J:Wright a September,4, 1986- Ted Hopson Covington & Crowe 1131 West Sixth_Street E P.Q. Box 1515 Ontario, California 91762 SUBJECT: AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO SCHLOSSER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Dear Ted: Enclosed for your review and comment`.is a Draft Amendment to the Schlosser Development (agreement. As you will recall, City Staff was directed to initiate this Ame=dment by the City Council. The clriginal 25 year Agreement received 2nd reading last night. The proposed Amendment would simply extend the 'life of the Ac-Bement to 40 years. It is our intention to place the Amendnw~kt on 3`le October 8, 1986, Planning Commission Agenda. Iwould appreciate receiving your comments /�r v erns by September 15 19'0.. If you have any questior:s please e, fr a to cdnt t me or Jim Markman. Sincere Y. COMMU E ELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - PLAN a WIVISION" Ot outilj Se or Planner Y:dak cc: Jim Markman, enclosure - Y 9320PASEI.NERO&3,SUITEC• snSTOF�iCF,8fSX807 • RANCHO CUCA1viL4 G A,CALIFOM''19 98 =8 Y730 a 14 t CI ) A l 51 ITY c PLANNItJ0 p U Q ON94 1VISNUMBER ONE J',IVir CENTER CIRCI£ r!$j..,1rTrI.#lFtt�,�tc�3l fOUF17t1"FLOOR I DAMES L MARKMAN P.O.BOX IO99 ANDREW V ARCZVN.9K1 +I ;6REA.Cx1'LIFORNIA 9267�2, RALPH O,'•HANSOH 1055� �"� A.CRAIG FOX (17141990 0901. 4 MARTHA J(1 GE,1'SLER ( � TELEI HONE{\1Z 131 691.18I1 MEMORANDUM TO: Brad Buller, City Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga r FROM: Jar.,es L. Markman, City At /;4/f.Pf I DATED: August 26, 1986 l RE: Amendment No. 1 to Schlossft`Development (. Agreement 1 I I , Attached in reference to the.above matter please find the following documents: I 1. A form of Ame: 'raent No.L l to Development Agree ment which simply extends the term of the agreement from twenty-five years to f41ty years; and I 2. A form of ordinance for ultimate Council con- sideration. Q As you will recall, we were directed to process this amendment at the last Council meeting at the same time that the Council continues to process the original develop- ment agreement. I suggest that you suPPly a Cupy of the proposed amendment- to Iced liopson for his review. The amend ment Is rather simple so I cannot see him wishing to modify it. Then, the. amendment must be processed asa zone change identical, to the processing of the original development agree- ment. P i Please indicate if you have any questions on thisitem at this point in time. j JLMsjk Enc.l. �lENDMENT Z.O. 'l. TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ?* That `Development Agreement concerning that real property described in Exhibit "A" hereto and approved by Ordinance H7o. 296 of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga by and b`tween Philip D..Schlosser and Elaine M. Schlosser, husband and wife, as community property, Albert W. Holguin, Jr. and Roberta J. Hiolgk`'x, husband and wife, as community property, ,7effrey P. So sser and D'acqueline L. property, Schlosser, husband and wife, as �ommvn�.ty and DavidM. � Richardson and Jean M: Richardson, husband and wife, as co,7imunity property ("PropPrty Owners") and the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City") hereby, is amended as of this day of 1986, as follows: 1, Paragraph 9 is amended to r2ad in words and 4 figures as follows; w 42. 9. Term of Agreement. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the date hereof, regard- less of the date of actual execution hereof, and shall continue for .forty (40) years and may,be extended by City and Property owners thereafter." � i 2. Other than as expressly amended hereby, tha above- referenced Development Agreement and each and every term and pro- vision thereof shall remain in full force and cffect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. l has been � exdcuted by the parties and shall be effective on the clay and year _first above written regardless of 'the date ofactual execution hereof. CITY:. CITY. OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: mayor BYt APPROVED AS TO FORM: Caty Clerk City Attorney PROPERTY OWNERS Phillip D. Schlosser Address: �f Elaine M. Schlosser ` Address: Albert Holguin Jr.r Address: l E" Roberta J. ,Holguin Address: Jeffrey P. Sc osser Address i r, Jacqueline L. Schlosser f Address: C ..2_ 4. AML 4 David M. Richardson Address: Jean M. Richardson%, Address:' STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) } ss. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO t On , 1986, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County, personally appeared PHILLIP D. SCHLOSSER, ELAINE M. SCHLOSSER, ALBERT HOLGUIN, JR.,- k ROBERTA J. HOLG-OIN, JEFFREY P. SCHLOSSER, JACQUELINE L. SCHLOSSER, DAVID M. RICHARDSON, JEAN M. RICHARDSON, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persons whose names are sub- scribed to this instrument, and acknowledged to me that they executed it. Notary Public [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) On , 1986, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County, personally appeared and , proved to me on the basis if satisfactory evidence to be the persons who executed this instru- ment as Mayor and City Clerk, ?respectively, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation existing and organized under the -3 Laws of the State of California, and acknowledged to me that the City of Rancho Cucamonga executed it.. Notary PU511-- [SE.L] i a i I .. I a i 1 1 1 -4- 7 EXHIBIT "A" (Legal Description) t Parcel 1: Lots 25 and 26, Town of Rochester, as per Plat recorded in Book 9 of Maps, Page 20, Official Records of San Bernardino CountV`, EXCEPTING THEREFROM, the west 438.66 feet thereof. I Parcel 2: The west 438.66 fees of Lots 25 and 26 of Rochester, as per Plat recorded-in Book"9 of Maps, Page 20, Official Records of San, i Y Bernardino County, EXCEPTING THEREFROl�, .the west 50 feet of said ... Lot 25. Parcel 3: - Lot 27, according to Map of Rochester, as per Plat recorded in Book 9 of Maps, Page 20, Official Records of San Bernardino County, ' California. r ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THAT LEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE C'TY OF RANCHO CUCAM0NGA .AND PHILLIP,D. SCHLOSSER, ELAINE M. SCHLOSSER, ALBERT HOLQUIN, JR., ROBERTA, a. HOLQUIN, JEF'F'REY P. SCHLOSSER, JACQUELIN L. SCHLOSSER, DAVID M. RICHARDSON ,AND JEAN M. RICHARDSON The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council finds ant2 determines as• follows: A. Government Codk` Section 65864 through 65A59.5 authorizes the City to enter 'into and to amend binding Development Agreements with persons having` legal or equitable interests in real property for the development of such property. B. Three copies of proposed Amendment No. 1 to that Development Agreement (as contained in Exhibit Y attached) (' between the City and Phill p Iz Schlosser, Elaiae M. Schlosser, I Albert Holquin, Jr., Roberta J. Holquin, Jeffrey P. Schlosser, f Jacquelin L. Schlosser, David M. Richardson and Jean M. Richardson are on file in the office of the City Clerk, and the same are public records of the City. C. Proposed Amendment No. 1 to the above-referenced G Development Agreement pertains to real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County, of San' Bernardino, and descriled as follows: PARCEL 1: The West 438,66 feet of Lots 25 and 26 of Rochester, as per plat recorded in Book 9 of Maps, Page 20, records of said County. EXCEPTING therefrom the West 50 feet of said Lot 25. PARCEL 2; Lots 25 and 26, Town of Rochester, as per plat recorded in Book 9 of Maps, page 20, records of said County, EXCEPTING therefrom the West 438.66 feet thereof. �:.rdinance No. Page 2 r` PARCEL 3: I-3t 27, according to Map of Rochester, as per plat recorded in Book 9 of Maps, Page 20, recox'ds of said County. D. The Planning Commission and City Council duly held public hearings on the proprit4dd amendment No. 1 to said Development Agreement. E. The Planninq ,Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga rerommended';approval of Amendment No. l to said Develop- ment Agreement to the City Council by minute order on 1986. F. The provisions of proposed Amendment NS'. 1 to said Development Agreement are consistent with the GeneraltPlan, and the provisions of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. SECTION 2: Proposed Amendment No 1 to the Development Agreement between the City and Phillip D. Schlo-,ser, Elaine M. Schlosser, Albert Hoiq in, Jr., Roberta J. Holquin, Jeffrey P. Schlosser, Jacquelin Ta Schlosser, David M. Richardson and Jean M. .r Richardson referred to'-in Section l above, is hereby approved. On the effective date of this Ordinance, the Mayor shall sign as many copies of said Amendment No. 1 as are necessary for the i use of the parties, the City Clerk shall attest to the same and ' shall deliver one fully signed copy to the property owners. SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this G rnance and the �. City Clerk shall cause the same to be publisted with n fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a news- paper of general circulation p:iblished i;n the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rant,bo Cucamonga, Califs iia. PASSED and ADOPTED this day of 19 , y � 86. Mayor I, BE`LRLY A. AUTHE.LET, City Clerk of the City of. Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that tht foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of , 1986, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Aft Council of -the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of 1986, by the following vote: i -2- T Ordinance No.. "age 3 I AYES: COUNCIL MSMIIES NOES: COUNCIL a:;;4t3ERS:.' ABSENT. COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MMBER5: yY ATTEST: } Beverly A, Authelet, C 't�•- Clerk- 'City of Rancho Cucamot%fa 's !v 1, I -3- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ��CA,1.rp STAFF �.14PORT o DATE: October' `8, 1986 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission � FROM: B�•ad Buller, City Planner BY: Christer Westman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 86-07 - GENERAL TELEPHONE - A proposal to locate a 624 square. foot unmanned remote switching station at 9090 19th Street in the Medium (M) Residential District (8-14 duiac) - _« APN: 201-221-08. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A. Action -Kequuestteed: Approval of a Conditional. Use Permit and issuance of a Negative De.;laration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North Low Residential (L) (2-4 du/ac) South Ldw Residential (L) 2-4 du/ac) East - Low Residential (L) 2-4 du/ac) West Medium High Residential (MH) (14-24 du/ac) J C. General Plan Oesi nations: Project Site - Medium Residential (M)' (4-14 du/ac) North Low Residential (L) (2-4 du/ac) South Lcw Residential (L) (2-4 du/ac) East - Low Residential (L) (2-4 du/ac) West - Medium High Reside.ry;�l (MH) (14 ,du/ac) D. Site Characteristics: Directly north of the project site is Cal Trans Freeway right-of-way. Community Baptist Church is in the process of constructing additions to their church, however, this portion of the site at this time is still vacant. II. ANALYSIS: A. C�neral: The intent of the unmanned switching facility is to - prbvide extended telephone services to the surrounding residential areas. This project is located at the northwest ` orner of Betiyl and 19th. GTE will be leasiig a 541' x 751 area I ITEM C CANNING COMMIaSION STAFF ` � REPORT October 8,, 1986 -- CUP 86-07 Gener21 Telephone f Page from Community Baptist Church in which to construct the ,• switching station at the northeast corner. Service to the unmanned switching station is reached throu!(h the church parking lot. An access agreement has been lxe mad*r, tvieen the Community Baptist Church and General.._ l,ghane,,: F B. Design Review, Committee: Because of the comprehensive reconstruction of the Community Baptist Church, it was required by the Design Rerriew Committee that the remote switching G station be similar in architectural style to the church expansion, C ; C. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the-applicant, Staff has completed 'Part II of the Environmental Checkiist and found no significant environmental impacts related to the use of the remote switching station. III. FACTS FOR F'_'IDINGS: The proposed use is consistent with the Genera Pan and Development Code, The proposed use 1 .qether with the recommended Conditions or Approval will not be a irimental t,3 the public. health, safety or welfare -or materially. injurious to properties or improvements in the area. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This -'tem has hepn. advertised as a public heeIring in The Daily Report ne"' 06er, property posted and notices se-t, to r all property owners within 300' of the project, V. `RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning CommissM issue a Tlegative -Declaration and approve Conditional Use Permit 86-07' through adoption of the attached Resolution and t: Conditions of,Approval. 4ulRidlysub fitted, ler City Planner 68:CW:dak Attachments: Exhibit "A" Location, Map Exhibit 91 - Site Plan Exhibit ^C'I - Elevations Exhibit °D" - Community Baptist Church Master Plan Resolution of Approval with Conditions N l �jF ` '%YAT t. M.V`f tit yQ a C L l + y{ �E� E� e FT1 t� r��y .. �. ii r 03 LP �i es�za. G��}J7[ s. pEl # .. _—• ST 1cACT � � III < i t i G= NORTH PULINI ZING DIVI5O 1 SCALE.- t�t "r rtTetrx r JW /•s it-.a .M/topky �..�L?YOfCR1♦C��p II a tM�1FNOl.t+ OL.INATOM IM9 w £Ia COi10 'r ♦ y�� ` �- LAN09CKGD� aV:101Y0 `�w.� 2(I�•O�CgLLNi � o� a r � '3 ' fYiVR•21I4\{eIOV f' y' �♦ OPYG CVR,. / _ f `-'P-c•aloe cou0.yt�ur �y�� I`r ✓ V 4 NORTH CITY OF 4 R.,-%.i CHO C..7CANIi��lTGt T!i LE SCCt=. .f� =1 PLANNING DIVISIGN r.-K[i[rcr. sc,,�Le= ►•'� , e. If ? lqw � ?�I..'/..'�hu•�'—{ail{.1�, 1 ii.� r_�_�— .....�...� ���_�� � _ �t 1 'AfMT eL CVAT1oTV w somP r-4C/ATtJ, hI . I EAST C'4eVdT10N =-�-- NORTH �T RANCHO CUCA1'ONGA TITLE- REP;; 1 HEIR, NEI!, -077 I ff J- � I f r G NOR H OTY OF rM I. RANCHO Ur{sN-40G TITLE; 3�rt? f 1-1 t tt�3 PLANNING DtVISTON .'-14P ��- RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF TM IRANCHO CUCA,ti9ONGA PLA-t'T�G COMW'o`SION APPROiIING CONDITIONAL USE PERiLIT N0. iyu-07 FOR AN UNMANNED REMOIE 'SWITCHING' STATION LOCATED AT ' THE J NORTNWiST CORNEP OF BERYL & 19TH IN. TK -:;ED1UM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT - APN. 201-221-08 i. WHEREAS, on the 13th day of August, 1986, a cor,plete,application was _ filed by General Telephone for review of the above-described pro,ject; and WHEREAS, on the 8th day of October, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a'. public hearing to consider -the above-desrribed project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows- SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with--the General Plan, the objectives ofthe Development rnde, and a he purposes of t,ie district in which the site is located. ! Z. That the Lproposed use, toge.;her with the conditions applic�.ble thereto, will. be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injn;ious to properties or improvements in the vi 4r:i ty. 3. Thai the proposed use complies" with each of thE' app-i'cable provisions of -the Development Code. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and- at a Negat:Eve Declaration is issued on Octnber 8, 1986. SECTION 3 That, Condit7ana Vse Permit No. 86-07 is approved subject to e o low*ng cenditi_as: PLANNING• 1. That a wrought iron fence shall be constracted behind the trees proposed on the east side-of the project and along the west and south sides of the project. 2. Landscaping shall be consistent with the overall landscape concept for the church. 3. Exterior building material color and texture shall match the approved materials for the church expansion. i f PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION Octobeer 8, 1986 CUP 86-07 - General Telephone Page;'�� t` APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS STH DAY OF OdOBER, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF`mANCHO CUCAt BY: r. Dennis L. Stout, airman ATTEST: i Brad Buller Deputy Secretary, I. Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing'Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at';.,� regular meeting of the° Planning Commission held on the 8th day of October, 14986, by the following vote to-wit. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS; ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 1 f C R C-8 F, wN4C�vyi OFy L. M1..q d� V� qLi y pb0 �� �� gd O V Y Y q ,• N u V P d a _ _ • op�4zr px w. vmxo. gagC L N Lpa#r Lq�D p R .; E.G �Oq LG f �,N^,�wpiF�04 am:YL pC1r Ca _ LO .��E U wov gyfe ua,: 1ac�a ^'$io a qo4 4u x� up w LG+uiu A.,.5 Y=.�e CJ04C day 9.g4p �,. Q ..O.sY�"yVpa .i y.N o.L.ot';..CO= qp,"iu� D L� C•e0.'.pr N Y O V Q gg �„b 6 d aq Ct ■� L tiT �. N C VV (s �kjy I pl, ' N �CC04 N �Yy wGr '�r.O yy. �YO NQ ��p H..Ov"OV p j �' •y a P744.O �... rL Opr OO.Y�� dv,G `K Etr�- _ I OOu. •H Ci J.4+.0 w�'q V6u N..CC �p O�gG/Oy OUOb aui<d Y: 11 r } N Y A CCos..+a N..�.w g ya.y p scy dS 1. NN Lr.�.uAGR 7.N4�A...r. ,GGdS�. pp.0 ~,aLi.NC � LL GM M1 l+ OL1A N, tlCY� 4M+�S+rE `i Osm lL"t.A1.,4V ! I . �.z � W J ei4d c1J L L 31 pg� 71( �GNOq O �Fi ( V � a OQr.d q�4n YI Y q y _ h==Y Oy a..� C 0V 22ittt�'Qb Cyt Q�G�q F 'r0 4t a � Y,t GvyVah V !ggO `y +1r L Ogg O� C it _ = E O O �11 4 P y g d w +� (i �. 4 a� NY ON..K.p CV-O ' .. , w 'V^' /� N. w.�. • 4 14 M' Yf sq �Or C •uL ,dY LECLO _ .^LL 6 -q A Vim` `CyC gg YI.+N AL l..pTOT Nw CN'! Q^ NO Ca � � U "•Yv H E Y r LY ES. b.A+a dq iJ.oyp qC Q C O O r 2Ly A V C .•_ U G y t L -.4. qq _ �L 6 U90vL� CrOidq OLN�O 'O qO LY y«.. WYI t Y.q 04 E cu Z2. .610.". Yc ZaY gLAA� .b G Yo .r-.� .' d Er -TvuN' :La «�.g "o. is .c. m _ „'n qp Ei ZwLiC �y U6C �} A y N. T �C Z. C"dA y.L.G lC;� T.=wOb.Y-y~ qa N� YE Y O nCc q O •l 9 Y q C ^ �O W Lw NC. C.0 O � t 'M'� • V C W EE O Cf �q� }YuC C O C .TN tl d Y C`S Y V i M.• Y C N 2 O t q L M N b S O S E O'N O A� V}, _ t`N N } �.O a`l R.Q OI aI O. o c'Y � s v qY E..b 3N .. Lo '.L..G vaaiu n'G u:au u'e.YL„ Yc. Lb o �C V Y c pp=M N N.r t.AC x.O N CC�.N 6 Y O.C L d C+. yy A O Z a N� L. UE:- `w. Nf'.w.r0 W_r+S n� KL a N66 O N 1 Cq 6E YO T�,UI a^ . =it C< aV AV • YY�=N TL6 �9 O w0..•JC U� w 'a. NrgC.S. d G.i ..L O�r,p EEOY Ar Q,LL�Fs Y: V d. C YU. dIr CLN C Y=� A _ a L. �. ^CE9 NFL. YMVA.q` O6 OIL LLY.i ~Y C N cET.� ' Nd4 - DoNO �Y. NM y N Y . L K C y'j w U N z q t C V y O i l d =N��r'4 w; O L G • C 9 N CI c UC 9 qOV dN/- NL• C OEpOOM 9 u� 12.O.c. y ngOr}+,G L,O .1 Oib SEA.sE 2 _ N "c u .a+ c qc Boa te'CC W �YY U C . Cb YCL o O O CUY W't �T�E VO A`9 E L =Y qp M VCC Lw.V C • .O LOM G }..Ma .. Wa WaYEVC' po AAN u U } V OIL ` Y C =E� OI C +.•C..L .G L O�� C U b V�}L S 9 G�bi a �2 !.E O9 AO A n�>UGF O.Tl d,VO^ Uppp=Y <A 6L6 ^N6 pb9 OI'sT H. -- O `O A V q u O.^L O.4 C Ys T,a G u C L 6 •L W ^ro V .22 .�.. Mi AZ q0 GO Ld YL.Y' QY GO > �T per' L6NY M Nn CG CY O.r O~�^L ...a.. L .GVVtl A N46 �' N wd L.L. Ofp^9 Ld V � M EQ9,L C Ol p. 6t0 ` L G Zo... ^Z.G Y 1 � Vtl q NOOV 4 O r Q oMQq ( L %` LL q ow:o oY a� a °'•��e N.dCL YAI U. 00gN VE .i T.q L u �I n0 6 O Ir p V a. V Qw Lpvny GG 9^µpY C p N pp Na O NV WVY O OlV a... OCu EL ...OIu . Lariq aL.. mC Yu a O$ L•C L� Ctl. ate. Qom.T.n o.9 w.q u L tiNo,c aIV oaG 'a�d no wtl O� •�Y.� Q R EA�I•pl YQD `} pN Cp ALLtO LC.q��- NO.OL G NLI Lin. O� MIw.+ O VN VV •`wwT CT�GM V Vq� N3 9 YY u�• ti �'y gytl C.�G n6 C..Y p^. tlM IFS nyi wULtl I L\fy. O L ^nL �.N di] CN u C L.0 w M y - V G C ^x • � NL c � n G t aL L C C L' 9 G C G'• w u •' L L ,O � O N Y .V ,�^ .O p9 YY L.w L 6 �Y•�. O =1 d.0 7. G• L C n,.N 6 O O 4 .G�C4 w9CC w TOlpyw N w Y G V A ^ y M tl Y O N G V drr Y � .z u W o n it I I � �' aV G t ^ d G p1 m m :0 6 a•a.tl N Nz cr ta �.. a L 'G^. ql R.0 �^ a vc �gapY of tl' '~"`e�. •� YL� f.tl O Tom. n C j V N Y tzex O > YV�Q ^ 9 u N CN 4Y Cy PO a ,J Y rCVO. L_O L Ya K pt Z L b N N _ c pp 1N h p.V s V C4 T~OO w=O Ty Y�CCC y �V.iq tl N� LLN 9� ��O N y.L +VO.Y .L A dy cue •' "vLi in om py. N4. �u�. Y G..aiy CLn �VUGI .e "" a n• 9 V'� N^ V C EE Y J#n > > np O LC- rd VY •i e < t] V9C ■■ d aa �L 9 Y p 3 V 6A ,Y Y.�UL • >sYG Qa L.� C�Ua'`OV - • Q.L+wC < w.0 <oN Ib 6w 4v <v rLON►q .Gjp C tl O r L o b a EE E Lu y a.•� a g C 'a u'. adi o E yS 9 c uEE GQ ytJ ^_ 9 i'J pV b CnNW Y�O yyd Y n.N v .. OS RlJ .. dUL YV 13 Od 3 >R0.yY v + W ?u Y d b., p Nx EeE c o q0O 9O0 Zz. f. nEE V n0 H %YV0... S ••• tie L j� •O N N�• V aS n. = lWi 7 L q Y .0.�. Co E aee ��a d �p NPq o E L E EOC EO..0 S =tJ.ri' b1E )• pCb.Ll �L .-k W � cocy'� �u W SSA now.. c a'a c9. •'� 2 qV`CPCC. �V- W uc -qyE C C9 ri -= A sL ^ H yyY � N 46. N�-' Y WC aJ�G jN b6 d y.� u n 4 V "• Wm A d.O E^g ..•`.,Cty N C nE > °' '�+ E.o+. _p o 4 a a'u _• �c ovT' 3.nO b. A ^ E b V rib v n 1-1 � F�4 RM 2 1L•lG 1•YWL i�.6Isd.N d�w•••O. Vd S AML Nt b. - oll •'y OZ•. b IT . C • Nn0 OC '.` 49 C y n �O L •L Ot�l E O H d L n ' N q' O E. L.b , N is 2_5 E o N y8% O cM p n TY E CY W 9.4 9 Nq MO 06 O • d =•�p• _ P C y C Z CS Cp CyV gO.pn. EE yy�d CL '•_, VWWN gv E r,nL 6Ny p 9.. ~ C•7.0.. >E. ld 'y �YiC Zz 1, r12 ,,. a L a• umr Y L ...d.,..o .L.. a�d c�."'n o�a•x uE c.�b a v+ � �oA..i N E 9y L4 Y6 �P'b:°w bd Pn �.p1 (.r--d.-b d •+ O Y r Np.9 E E "Y o M Cd LpN E.� qd C� q- LAC CI nL.� fl P .:L qs« W�dL. v u _ N 2a O u ^ 29.E. • CSq= 9d J Vo'•tn �. y YE yYa qua Z y�u4C n igg^ p u.e. a N r L V . av: = 6. C M L E O 6•? ` Y.�p y w W a Y O n. 41 b g O S�O C �• N b E Y 3 � �'-'na V: vni: e •d++t v SE .• d n� a^e ow. _w �" �^Et :2AVAL a. .n• J L@, 4 ;O E 4 6 m. a 4 W W d p fi 2 L d-.,..Y. p rI �.Y OQ^9 pCp 01ffiL � = Vy II 3 yN� iL�JiLw �Ru q � �. d LII Ora. •�+ lm= C Cf No 4� t V E O cB r G N L ya N • 6 � Q r� G d Z gL0.fi a.y...4�� L.C. �4 q - Y.`FNLaY Pq. GC~ VV �4 Y L yYty.L py •'^,! n ,,.a Q 5. `.N+':r Y 4 N v c.:�a.a For' ,O uc w...vgo -•,y cd� j@Nq{ yi =. 4 �.,uqbb uV - aYn ud�YpcB aYL O.r C q� = A Ie.Q�q I.O..0 qM C .V�II «'II ffi•+y,U.. 6 q y y � � p 4 L., w 5 ap}'N-' (,�i OIN C O1` Y' V C Y r n.. Y 4 ffi M. II a KG CII tl1Y Od.aC rY L .qL. M7��.. FL 4v � a..c� -6.d tr m'al'u <o ua Oa~w o C '`]fit ag u qya dY ci.: Fd GC.` "Z M Cy K. e�yyy Op CLpp� u 4 --.e S! O C CQ CP 13 a- iGM Cw 646 47 V 'QY LC O pOIQ � 4i. aM C •. Yii�l ~G+• OQ.. -� ytT :C Au:iT Lt N�■ . O.r YOEE. � LGC. _�C Y rpp �� � S L 9 V G Y9C LY �nv V 6. ♦-4 G Y�V T IJ A4 C ^' Ln L YOwS X .y WRN.c Va C C r 4 C. r.•y 6� E Yyp'.� C.y��. vYO q •t} Y • �� �� dC CN'.' � pV e � V Vr ONYO i�r i� + TQ Ft] R IIR ` K. y'.e �. i C'wA b` C L342 YWp Qy ''w Ae m n o" G t '. ` oyr AMA' n...ii 0 r. F 'q= 4 C L��:r y R � a� .r � • -r..A p O N C 4 a E 4� �.F,. yeg1 Aa - =i tL yo"L.c da p nQ's au. .. y3iZ yGv v'� III. 'Aa' q - L� �y O � "" V YwK Q.Y4Y QN]•.N.V �9 01� C9My EL Vt. �.0 �� 6LCr CL Nq YY Wt 3 W U4 �R. t1�0.2 <•.r KQ KOI u Y-O 6 N a.. u S Y ^na 4 r I L P Y f J! r V is - yu` Lo an Q LYv �- ea w rs.Lo i Cq N 1Ci Y q Y a�qc b pG y V '6s gat CL +6 •ey �Y Ed p9Y 'LP��Y♦ T yyLb w. tll LPCCN � CN Lp�It Y � �.�� mW �C qNu C.r. V Q. E + s p L Q'• : b Y 8 '+x p n H V 1UNy UL 4CP n„ PS.Y.pG. Ey` br Y = LL LY • ^ .C. r1e. C ay Cy .. �'� y. - .u. i a� ar�i. a.. T ^L G u72` S J[' 02'Y Uo Q O QT p ^ I LpN �. I O S L '. Yr n�N. YY LNU NW. w PY.abWL L.n Y{C b nq „ p I. �+.tC •„b L w T Y N Y q Y O p + Y n +V A y NO•/w=i Y. NO ILL�. !U 6._ WMAil YU �61 LIb lh0. C Hp � YDYC b 4.upi 4M '. n T aN •• LVY w q o " N�o G M S T J w c e O Y ^ Cp LJ��i 12 C b o �al•a of uan r.�S`n � �+ Ln o� a'�,: L b y O T 4C N~~CC u.V r' .:Ia aN C 1•N ~ i� yBS �L C•�N_ 9CL� O'_ V a G. Ll pr-w' �y I p is CIS poa' 'o yL ry. Nit tir o o. W P �4 p.T bN-onV14 Cw YL LT `� n'nL ICI _ CbbCL- T `n ^_`.. 6aU N6W 5.' l 6W ip P • _ �V , k f Z y U C N t A t L4U.� ll uor C eryc o,-- n u�00. t �d N ` 4q N � N CY W uh• Y �u C ■a CD ,r n V $�' �L Y t u$ �. 9s• a $� 4 r a v,.c ads gym. �ra' ap NL Pn 6.: tlYc a2"'q pp uv,C aay� p oN=fix vw UY r� emu= up Yw N.E L M�M:Y Y. Y a,.y 4 Lama SL P�: Ca.'� ttlfp a!R NY t qr b 7. tl.@n�ro N Y. K t C C C.i CA G 4 Y u flu t Oa4 +6 SLY aL" •.� Y^y > s4jC 63 g4 y'�4 L L4 � 6W �L VNFN vC.^l 4�.� i4YY u tl G ro N N K u G .�. r � 2� � � L O •x C O~ �L 4 .V MqqF Y9Y }y C U � .4iD a ON..i Y`7C s t YIp gy C. tp.�C Q.aa 01s�q tlY OL btl+ � .p.d`IY ror .� tlti� F�N a.j� LbNL tV -i NC U Las <W 6r NCS N' 6Nx.iw 1"� Y t0. 1=•� bJ4piC 29lL tq � �r0 CITY OF RMCHO CUCAMONGA z DATE- October 8 -1586 191 TOt Chair—In and members Of the Planning Commission FROM: Bran SB41fer, City Planner ,,• „ 'SUBJECT; CONDITIONAL U52 PRMIT 86-17 - GENERAL TELEPHONE w A prap'osa to ; oca#e A bb5 square faat anmanne pmote r switching station D6rth of Highland 4nd east of Milliken .APN 225-141-29. ! i Bill Leamon, Attorney to the Diocese; has requested that consideration' of Conditional Use Permit 86-17 be continued from the October ;8, 1986 Planning Commission meeting to the October 22nd rneeting The put',pose of the continuance is to resolve it deed restriction conflict tir-,�t cWld not 1 permit the remote SwitchinS station on the subject property. Mr;', Leamon :{ will be submitting a formal written r ?_st to the Corx is s 4' n 1� r.the J t - continuance before the meeting on OctobeY, 8th r, Staff concurs with this request,for-continuance, 1 i Jjr j i y ITEM D CI'T f OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ��cnaroM REPORT a E... z DATE: October 8, 9v6 1977 J ! TO: Chairman and Members of -the Planning Commission FRO14: Brad Bui l en,, City Planner BY: Chri,ter Westmar., Assistant Planner SUBSECT: EN4'IRpNME14'tAL kSSE$SMEtiT AND C011pITIp!'.4t. USE PERMIT 85-2I' ._ utc rtn "TOR an existing° ui uin9 with a lease space of approximately 1,000 sgtia:ra feet in the 6th Street,' Industrial Park located In the Industrial Specific Plan, (Subarea 5)r' General Industrial Rail Served, located at s 10088 Stir Ktraet, "Mu - APN: 289,411-39, I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: tK A. Action Re uestEd: Approval of a Conditional Use Permit and issuance' 0 a egative Declaration, 1 B, Ss rround7n_ Land 8se ;inch' rzn t - f North General Industrial/Rail Served,^(Subarea 5) South Industrial Park. (Subarea 6) East - General Industrial/"ai? 5er ed (Subarea 5) WeSt. General Industrial/Rail Served, (Subarea 5) G. General Plan desianatians: project Site - General Industrial/Rail Served orth - General Industrial/Rail Serve4 South - Industrial Park East - General ?ndustrial/Rail Served West - General Industrial lRai'I served -b Site Characteristics: The applicant propose; to locate it, an establiihe_d-i-nTu`st­F1'-al complex, the 5th Street Industrial'Park that has a t;tal of 78,800 squat:., feet of building 'space crt approximately 4.5 acres of land, E. hpplicable P:,yulations A prink shop 1 classified as a ` 75sine"ss upporr ervi"ce'" which is a 'conditionally permitted use in Subarea S, ITE14 E xS T c PLANNING COMMISS1,04 STAFF REPORT October 8; 1986 CUP 86-21 Ravindra Rao Page 2 Y II. 'ANALYSIS. E, A. General The existing industrial complex was built in 1978. ,e num er of parking spaces available ,in the center is apAraxim" ly 190 which is a ratio of 1 space prr 415 square feet. The manufacturing project required a minimum of 1 4? parking space per 500 square feet; therefore, there is a surplus of approximately 34 spaces'> minting shops are ciarsified'as commercial operations and require l space per 250 square feet oW; 4 spaces. All of the other tenants in the complex are considered to be manufacturing.; Staff feels that there is adequate parking to accommodate the extra 1 and 1/2 spaces required' by the print shop. The proposed Print Shop will conduct business from 8 00 .a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and is currently staffed by 1 employee. Printing facilities consist of 2 Offset Printer. B. Environmental Assessment: Upon review and cempletion of Part I ,. and -TI�oBr the"initial' Study, Staff has found 'no significant adverse envir<snmental impacts related to-_the ` proposed project. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: 1. That,,:5e proposed use is in accordance with the General Plan y l obaectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the Industrial Specific Plan S0area `in 'which the site is located as evidenced` by the Conditional Use Permit provisions for business support services in this Subarea: 2.. That the proposed use will not be detrimenta. to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to' properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan and Development Code. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Dal y Report newspaper, the property posted and notices sent to aTT property owners within 300` of the project. S'AN►ING COMMISSIO-N STAFP::;REPURT CtO r 8, 1886 r CUP 86-21 - Ravindra Rao Page 3 -1l V. RECOMENDATION: f Staff recoawnds that the Planning Commission i-s`sue>; "fe a tive 4eCi arati on _ and approve Conditional Use ' Permit 86-Z1 through the adoption of attaj:he ,,Keso7ution. Res fui3y Brad But er,' City Planner i - BB:CW:dak Attachments: Applicants Letter a Exhibit "A" , Location' Map Exhibit "B"" Site Plan E Resgiution of Approval C 1 i 6. #. e To, The City. ,4£.Rancho. Cucamonga,- Aug. 19th. 1986. planning Department. it TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN. Dear Sirs, The building which I leased for, I am q planning to open an Instant Point Shop and the product is for commercial industrial and personal priming requirements like business cards, letterlgeads,invoices, ? purchase orders, statements etc., I hope this will give you a general picture of my product. Thanking You. Yours truly. (Ravindre K. Rao r ,I G ,K u !.sr a MA 004 d4.20 ! 1 PAR.17 7' 1 S20 AC M/L i( i• 13.455AC.U/4. J"7a 1 5.03AC, 6 y4 b a.ca fb-.2 R An.3 Pat.I 4- V `•=/ 8 1 9.93 AC _ - 9.44•AP r 3.94 AC. 4.93 A;,:. 5.06 AC �.y97. 7C.A. ..(Ilt 15051 T. A, acsc �` 1301$ l+swc O 42 r> s-5o7ACre/� _ 27 Z3aacMA 1 Pat,3 Rtr.4 it rc ,�"'T ,(.35AC S.aa.iC 1-5JAC �. /ti2.48ACMA,- N ;r •T.19,7.7W NORTH CITY CIF tT,fit: GUP�✓� �� RANCHO C�.Cf��JIO�GA TITLE PLANNING DiViSIC)ti Y1t3t tT=--- SCALE- _t 100Sp ! �- t- w i -C, i d LU 4 1, I� lClax,7. 1pa8$ A Q 3 /a to� Q w c iX n S'I X7lfj f: NORTH CITE.' Or ITEM. COP Ii.AINCHO CUCATMO 4GA TITLE- Scram rL-A," PLANNING DIVIRON E:xmmT- E2 SCAUD. ._. �p RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT M 86-21 FOR A QUICK PRINT SHOP LOCATED AT 10088 6TH STREET IN THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN (SUBAREA 5) DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 27th day of Aggi)st, 1986, a complete application was filed by Ravindra' Rao for review of the above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 8th,;day_ of October, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a pubTic hearing to consider the above-described " project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1 That the following findings can be met: 1.' That the proposed use is in accord wica the General Pian, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district ii which the site is located, 2. That the proposed tise, together wiith the conditions applicable thereto, .:Will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or 'welfare, or materially injuriolii to properties ,or improvements in the vi ci of ty._ 3. That the proposed use complies with each of bike appl�;cable provisions of the Development'Code, SECTION 2: r That this project will not create,adverse impacts on the environrment~a t—Tiat a „egative Declaration is issued on October 8, 1986. SECTION 3; That Conditional Use Permit No. 86-21 is approved subject to t-We— oTTowing conditions: 1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the 1 Planning Commission, if approved use has not commenced within twenty-four (24) months from the date of approval, 2. This approval shall run with the applicant and shall become null and void upon a change of ownership or if the business operation ceases. 3 Any modification, expansion or other change in operation will require a revision to the Conditional Use Permit. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION � October 8,. 1986 CUP'86-21 Ravindra Rao - Page 2 qP 'a 4. Operat�bo of this business shall be subject to compliance with Class B Performance Standards. In particular, all uses„ shall be operated so'as not to r emit matter causing unpleasant odors which are perceptible to the average person beyond any lot fine of the lot containing such uses. APPROVED AND X)OPTED THIS 8TH,DAY OF OCTOBER, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE GILT OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Braa Bullar, Veputy Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and `f regularly introduced, passed, and advpted by the Planning Comkiscion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular^ meeting .of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of October, 1986,t by the following vote-to-wit.- AYES: COMMISSIONERSt NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERSi AIL F CITY OF RANCHO`CUCAMONGA �uCAmo �..1 STAFF REPORT a DATE: October 8, 1986 Ie/7. TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission �`. FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: €NVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86-12 - NALBANDIAN GROUP - The development of 114 apartment units ' in the Medium Density Residential District (5-14 dwelling units per acre) located on the south side of Arrow R3ute, east of Madrone AYenue - APN: 207-262-07, 25 b 26. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of site plan, -elevations, eva e]opment review and issuance of a Negative Declaration for a 114 unit apartment project. B. Surrounding land Use and Zoning: North - Market, multi-family units, vacant; Medium Density Residential (8-14 du/ac). South Singla-family residences, restaurant and office uses; General Commercial and Industrial Area Specific Plan. East - Single-family residences and warehouses; Industrial Area Specific Plan. West Single-family residences; Mddium Density Residential (8-14 du/ac). C. General Plan Designations: Project Site Medium Density Residential (4-14 du/ac) North - Medium Density Residential (4-14 du/ac) South General Commercial' and General Industrial East General Industrial West - Medium Density Residential (4-14 du/ac) D. Site Characteristics: The project site is currently vacant wit'` n average slope (�f 3% from the northwest to the southeast corner. ITEM F c PLANNIgb COMMISSION•RESOLUTION , October, 8, 1986 } DR 86-12 Nalbandian Group Page 2 a' II. ANALYSIS• A. General: The appl4•cant is proposing to develop a 114 apartment, + ` units using the optional standards. There will be a total of 15 residential buildings. Fourteen of the buildings will be twrj-story and will contain 8 units each. The 15th building will be a single story and will• contain 2 units. Tree floor plans are proposed for the site - a bedroom unit (M square feet) and two 2 bedroom units (805 square feet and 909 :square k feet). The applicant is also proposing a large central open space area containing a paddle tennis` court,' recreation. building, swimming pool and'spa, a tot Tot, and an active recreation area. 8., , Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee reviewed project on September 18, 1986, and recommended the following: 1. That sufficient architectural relief has not been provided. The Committee sugges� the applicant look into th,e possibility o,, sing pop.•oot windows, extensive stuc o deta.,`.ng, the roofs and/or other features to provide relief, especially on the front elevations of 'j Buildings "A" & 118" The revised el•^_vations are to be submitted to the ;Design Review Committee For furthQr review. 2. The "A" Unifi- *ted at the southwest corner of the site'% should be realigned' to provide variation of open space areas. 3. A better relationship between the location of residential units and the location of parking spaces should be provided. The applicant submitted a revised plan, indicating more equitable distribution of parking spaces that was acceptable to the Committee. 4. Sidewalk areas adjacent to the central open space area should be minimized. 5. Provide texturized pavement treatment at the site entries. 6. That the two northernmost trash enclosures should be relocated so they are not in direct line with the drive aisles. The applicant submitteO a revised plan indicating this change. r s PLANNING COMMTStO'N RESOLUTION .F October ,8, 1986 OR 86-12 - Nalbandian-Grog] . Page.3 - T `1� 7.>1, � Committee stated that a' 204;X '351 pool was -ft sufficient to serve the needs of the S` ! residents. A larger pool should be provided. v The applicant proposed a 25' x 50' pool which �^�l was accepted by the Committee. The Design Review Committee will be reviewing the revised elevations and site plan at the October 2, 1986, meeting. C. 'Environmental Assessment. Staff has completed the Environments ,Checklist and found'''no significant adverse �. environmental impacts as a result of this project, If the Commission concurs �,iit'h these findings, the issuance of a Negative .Declaration would be in order if the Development Review is approved. ` III. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The 0—r Report newspaper as a public hearing and notices were sent to/all property owners within 300` of the project site. IV. RECOMMENDATION: In that. the revised elevations and-. nd 5 � plan nave =' not been reviewed by the Design Review Committee at the time of the drafting of this report, no ret.ommendation will rye made_ at -phis time. Staff will update the Planning Commission after all inmi: has been received from the Design Review'-Committee`:,. Res tfully fitted Bra Buller City Planner BB:SMzdak Attachmdnts: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "D" - Elevations ExhiHt "E"' - Existing'Overhead Utilities MediLin Retidentlal 1 r Li LEI rawtpghway 4 i 71 1—t1 N R sidetetial ;LS ' ilF—f-------�— tndustrldl _RaD1 'C t laaa a �, Saa10 datwDod GC I •t �. General t � Co,rcnarleal tIl Meth-Street 13 S0t4( 13 Uft mon io ,oa soo NORTH CITY 011, � ITEM- RAIN CHO CUC ikTVIO'LNGA TITLE: //�a'/G.'.� PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBITt_�_S61-E= 1 r-If I� i S t j O� trztQ 4 f ' f' i �iP I - �tl � I••�.. ' if 117, - i s� ti CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE= Yxse�o s77� 7-y-9N _ PLANNING DIVLSKYN I::::'-�' E�HIt3iI': SCALE= t r, E29 e Y.. 000 W v i aw i f+ . T V [FORTH CITY OF RANCHO CLICA-ML O\TGA TrrLE: PLANNING DIVLgaN j r k 1 -u r x rtT,,.�l• , ,. 1)x C ! IRIF; r i is i S{lt ,lip, 3 a Fi•��. t(yy+ W ' ( •� t2i�.ry�f—�—`� �...rkx'^r�4 .. n. Lr'�"'+lrr "`4�J^�k�=� \ 1 � i CITY OF UL t: P.ANCHO CUCA-ML Oi�TGA ` PLANNING M ISICkV EXHIBIT: C FJ � ,�—,. i 's � ���L ,•� .fly (!•; '• � "�" @ram. I _z 'II'I � _r z�•. t't' t� VA i I � ® � a n l AWL 0 I CITY Or. rre%1: R AITC T�..iS..TcAmn�Tit A Pi.AVNING L MSIOV � EXHIBIT:D=i_SCNLE- - III +• •; ,,;I� _ ;�\ O t L.? � ms oa A co 1: U) m CITY 1�` O� CLL�.i�oi tiTL x� PUNNING DIV SM, �'' � cxt itt�rr: o-� Md }� t ( 4 t jM1!9 MMI ❑ndn 00 o aQ. 1 1 CITY OF RANCH C CAIMON:GA Trrt.E- I I{ zz Ask 6•y ' 4f 1 f Ii__ - - AMM mo E L� E 1 CIS'` OF rrF:%t: RAX",M CUCAMO GA TrrLE- €li PLA,11,NI U G DaTOON �1 E`:H:EI't= _ tit .w r r. ` O 1 �iLo 1� �tL n 1, > DG Y • t ���jIGJI,,��•� j�`�CF, 3r _�41x. _. �a4 k 1 o 3 � y• � lillll: -- CITY Cr ITBI-_ TITLE,.r✓ -yU/•CS PLANNING DIVISD.N � j Z EYHTBI T: .1�=<S S � "' -•-._.�. \LEA_ 7 II �,+a�"].. K•a+�� `�f�. �� ,� �r��M Ali Ap F t AmikCARPORT FLOOR PLAN' �,•.r-w � 0., wob .1LI TYP. SIDE ELEVATION y.rr' �� n. CITY Or. z TEAM: -i RANCHO CUCAMONGA TULE: �t�VaTfo�Cs PLANNIjNG DiVMN 9^�1 EXHIBIT. t_ — SCALE 1 a .. N Ul -- — -- - o - - - o . II - — - b s � J � CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 5 STAFF REPORT O 0 F Z DATE: October 8, Ig86 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission E FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner k r BY: Nancy Fong, Associate Planner SUBJECT: (ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VI5TA.PLANNED COMMUNITY e request to atmend the Terra vista Pjanned community by establishing a business park overlay zone for areas designated as Office Park, Commercial and Mixed Use, within the Planned P Community Boundary I. ABSTRACT: The developer' is requesting for ' recommendation of approval for issuance of a Negative Declaration and approval of a Community Plan Amendment for !% "Business Park Overlay Zoneu. II. BACKGROUND: The proposed amendment woul-0 allow, subject to a Con iona Use Permit, Business Park Overlay Zones in areas designated for office, commercial, or mixed use. The purpose of this .Business Park ..Overlay Zone is to provide for multi-tenant roj5'As fostering small business development. These types of ,Ir,dbator" spaces would be targeted at the small business users who require a combination office and warehouse type space, with the office use expanding over time to fill out most of the building area. The attached letter from the applicant explains more fully the purpose of the proposed Amendment and the, proposed added languages for Business Park Overlay Zone. - T11. ANALYSIS:• A. Conflict of Land Uses: The proposed amendment would allow light in us r1a evelopment in, a residentially planned community. In add,tion to the base uses established in each of the zoning distr cts, the Business Park Overlay Zone would permit such laid uses as custom manufacturing, light manufacturing, R & D, light wholesale, storage and distribution type of industrial land uses. Certain retail and service types of land use such as hardware stores, television and radio sales k' and repair, food and beverage sales, barber, and beauty shops are t o be added. proposed ITEM r ii t. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TVPC AMENDMENT 85-02 WESTERN PROPERTIES 1 ;: October'8, 1986 v Page 2 ' " Exhibit "B" shows potential areas within the=,Planned Community where, a Business; Park Overlay Zone could be r*quested. The primary issue is the proposal to allow custom manufacturing, ' Y light manufacturing and' light wholesale ,, storage and distribution. These types of land uses would not be consistent with the intent of the Terra Vista Community Plan or the City`s General Plan. Further, such uses' could create land use compatibility conflicts such as noise, odor, light, privacy, aesthetic, access and safety, The ;(ndustrial Specific Plan provides nearly 4,000 acres of developable land that is propt?riy ,zoned for the type of uses proposed, The Terr�<Nista Pla&,':`d Community is conceived as a series of residential neighborhoods linked together by common recreational and institutional \+unctions. The Planned Development is divided into four neighborhoods with. the two northerly neighborhoods more residentially oriented, while the southern neighborhoods have a higher proportion of land devoted to c5mmercial and mixed uses as shows in Exhibit "C". The purpose of this commercially zoned area south of Church Street is to provide transition uses to the industrial area south of X. Foott,411 Boulevard and transition to the Residential Districts north of Church Street. The proposal to allow industrial uses within Terra Vista is contrary to the fundamental tenet of zoniri g; incompatible land uses should be separated to avoid nuisance. The issue is one of land use, not design. Staff feels that allowing industrial uses would erode the intent of the Terra Vista Planned Community and not be in the best interest of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. B. Inconsistency with General Plan and Relationship to the HUstri�aT S ecz tic Plan - TH-Tity adopted the General Plan in 1981 wi -the purpose of setting forth broad community goals to- guide the City in managing effectively the complex integration of physical, social, culture and economic growth. These broad community goals are translated into specific policy statements and specify measures to accomplish the objectives of the Plan. Some of the objective policy statements established in the Land. Use Element stated that: o Land use should be organized to avoid creatiny> nuisances among adjacent land uses. a Industrial development should be coordinated to encourage and integrate industrial area with the maximum" flexibility and access to a regional circulation network. f., PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT, TVPC AMENDMENT 85-02 — WESTERN PROPERTIES October 8, 1986 Page 3 J Allowing industrial uses away from the Industrial .Specific Plan area boundary, would erode the, intent of this Industrial Specific Plan. The Amendment would also allow certain commercial uses within the Business Park Overlay Zane. These uses include small business retail and service uses, such as appliance stores and repair, plumbing shops and supplies, television and radio sales and repair, floor covering sales and installation, hardware stores, catering establishments any similar t_ messes, convenience retail and service businesses such as food and bEv;*age sales and newsstands: In essence, 0is would Kxp?nd commercial land uses into acres not intended for tha'se types of uses. This would conflict with City-wide regulations of ii;e Development Code and General Plan which establish a careful bala;{O of commercial, office industrial and 'resident.ial land uses r IV. ENVIRONMENTAL ASS�`((;tiSM1iNT: As a`result of the Initial Study, staff has eterm n tat l�proposed Amendment has the following potential significant advert& impacts 1. The proposed Amendment by adding industrial type of land uses, substantially alters the present or planned land use of the Terra Vista Planned Community and the General Plan. 2. The proposed Amendment,could conflict with objectives and policies of the, General Plan and the Industrial Specific Plan. 3. As a result of the propos'Ld Amendment in adding industrial uses within a residentially planned community, truck traffic .would increase substantially, adding 'traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, and pedestrians. 4. As a result of this proposed Amendment„ people may be exposed to an increase .in health, safety, and nuisance factors such as noise, a�o� or industrial accidents. In summary, staff has determined that the proposed Amendment may have a significant effect on the environment and cannot prepare a Negative' Declaration. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission direct the applicant to prepare and submit an expanded Initial Study. It should address the above list of potential environmental and land use adverse impacts, and provide mitigation measures and/or alternatives to alleviate or eliminate the potential significant impact as a result of adding industrial land uses within a residentially planned community, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT F TVPC AMENDMENT' $6"02 - WESTERN PROPERTIES October 8, 1986 Page 4 4 a M V. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In considering the proposed Amendment to the:Terra Vista anne , ommunity, the Planning Commission must make the following findings: A. The Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policy of the General Plan, B. The Amendment does prpmote the goals of the Land Use' 4 Element, and C. The Amendment would not��,Oe materially injurious, or detrimental to adjacent properties. VL. CORRESPONDENCE: This i em has been advertised as a public hearing in The � epos newspaper `and notices were sent to all property owners �riinin 3uU feet of the subject site. VII. RECOMMENDATION: ,Staff recommends that the Planning Commission conduct a r public Baring to review the proposed Amendment,receive public input and consider the following t.Ptions:. o If the Commission cannot support the Facts for Findings, a Resolution of Denial should be prepared for your review,' - o Should the Commission decide to consider the proposed Amendment, then direct the applicant to prepare and submit, for staff review, an expanded Initial Study" that addresses the potential land use and enviornmental adverse impacts as a result of this proposed Amendment. Upon completion of the document and a review by staff, the proposed Amendment should be scheduled for further Planning Commission review. 4Retfuli ,e City Planner BB:NF:ko Attachments: Proposed Text from Lewis Homes for Business 'Park Overlay Zone Letter from Developer Requesting for Amendment Exhibit "A" .- Land Use Conflict Matrix Exhibit "B Land Use Map for Terra Vista Planned Community Exhibit "C': - Neighborhood Concept of the Planning Community Exhibit D - Foothill Boulevard Design Concept Initial Study, 'Part II G Westem Propertfes —R E C E I V E D 1156NorthMounWlnAvenus/P.O,Box67o/up4ndyp4foM1ft917aSI gas.0971 CITY OF RANCHO'CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION May 29, 1986 AM MAY 3 01986 Phi 7181911QJ U 12111213141516 Mr. Dan Coleman, Senior Planner Planning Division City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320-C Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: TERRA VISTA BUSINESS PARK SUBMITTAL FOR PRELIMINARY REVIEW Dear Dan: As you know, we are preparing submittal documzints for the development of a business park in Terra Vista. Prior to form;il filing of the project, we would appreciate staff's informal preliminary review and comments on the I concept. For that purpose, enclosed are five (5) sets of the site plan and rendered elevations, along with a draft Of the new overlay zoning regulations which would provide for the type of development we envision. We will be requesting three levels of review for this project: '.jl) a zone change to provide for a broader range of uses than permitted in our OP zone, (2) a CUP, which our proposed zoning would requite for any project of this 'type, and (3) design/technical review of the development. We' anticipate that all three processes will proceed concurrently. Our reasons for bringing business park use into Terra Vista are relatively straightforward. First, this is a use for which there is, and wilf continue to be, a very strong demand in Rancho Cucamonga. Secondly, - development of sufficient incubator" space of this type is an essential .prerequisite to the development of the vast amounts of pure office space planned in Terra Vista. The market for high-tech and midrise office space does not come into existence all at once; it has to be fed by.a steady stream of small businesses which first establish a base in the city and then find that they need more or Aifferent office space as they grow. Business park space is important to balance our office space. Thirdly, in Terra Vista, we see the business park as an ideal transitional use, buffering residential areas from commercial and office districts. Along the main frontage of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue, we are planning intensive upper-end development consistent with the image appropriate to those corridors. Behind those uses, however, the land u::z changes to residential. A well-designed business park will ease this Wtransition because it is more residential in scale and design character. Mr. Dan Coleman, Senior Pfanner Nay 29, 1986 Page 2 It is also a more economically appropriate use for a s te'set well back from the majorarterials. z To be compatible with Terra Vista, 'a project of this type must be well landscaped and provide architectural interest as well as thoughtful site Planning. We are proposing that a CUP be_ required to give the City the ability to regulate the design and, thereby, ensure compatibility. We Ire proposing that the bu:k tress park be an overlay zone which could be applied, with City approval, in areasdesignated for office, commercial, or mixed use. We are very excited about this concept, and look forward to your comments on it. if you have any questions, please call John Melcher or me. > Cordially► !ayi tlock Project Manager KH:kr:506d Enclosures C i ro Z � 74 _CL ,z O F- q co Uth �+ Q Z¢ U ay C 0 3 Ln C 111i Q C p; C s i; tZ d Wrn g a w QW o w uj i i j i .ft c ` roc c mgCC �' d in O CC � N O m u sa' C� iQ:o m N U a 1 m U Ln :m m a) T c 10 N + L m al L 3 C. CI.S] .D N Y:ate+ N•� N. E L �Ln u C N `� tn En E , � L.J CN9- C m Nto m 'O tn N 00' C CI> N L m Ut to - aCNa L7 1> 1:- N42 Uctn gym ' p3 , a ..in c)C O L o aim to.0.ro to L' tri cu 7� W N Y E C•- L a�U tJ1-Q m N c N d. C.. ,o y m@ O •- yf]. ) L•O cL. o �L ma) a Nu C-V N M.. (U'N N L 0ro O m N O �@ m.m Z U r CSl C. Oc.. yo U. C a�+C d •C N d 41 V Na) •tn a,,, > O 'p. V� G C41 am L N _ _ 0@ L U to y N L. . L N L 47 L•�� i n` 3,F, O 7 p _W L. N'O d O-r0-� C .5� tn C' _ q U d� d c C �i,, f0 O 4- c N.-.,a.N M U'a >. N .` .++. Co u 3� 3uQwL� � mm L.� = V) om� a 3 m o m a a 0.0 � � _ m �' Lm doff NE i�w S. c at v a n es to my >w m° a� E G tsE @ d to L O i 21 O E'a c m m£ O N C.♦V.- U 7 4, of*1 �_ u) C ! omws� o ..J V tnmma .aN Usos¢ m Q V OUP i • d y m .tom U •(U L to >.a) 1i) N Ln N t!) N • +.:tn •tn C', > fl•��'4- U E O.0y lV. to in N d m 01 v N U O. L1E mw to'11v y m N � d N Q � U+ L U L O d 0- Eomo >,NLc cs m oao4. X41C ZT m (U E .5.0 4, =1 ; N N C J� N U1 m catU > .C1 a 3m � .0 .i 1ON ® O U 0 LO_ O.._ IN a _ U) L. Y L N. .O �H..�. ++ L tm U. am.+ O +-! w. C 0.O'm L. m 171 E m. CU +''+d,, 'fl O a) d .y � N+a'C t co :N U 4... L. E U! 3S c p O� C C v to > C .D++ U L.n., N 7 10 U 61 m - N 3 w. O -0•-' 10 00 a N O N'jj..,3 ,U U. a) N y p o -0-0 N 7.2 a) E N L N G L .a > ai N c G N to •i') i ++. o .. a L:F U++ 7 L. c�a� �C7 o d ctn m C` c to E �a-ra in a) E cm a. o �3 a"° m lZ„ N n•- aJ d X L'-� L 41 a. Q (D M.c -1 L Cl Q � u d) aa).0 W m O � CL a >.N d u C mi. m 10 aa) o a) co N N3oumic1mi+V a) m o aNi .0 m m °� "L- m aii N L mw tam 3 a C N Gail'= r C of O E U p .0 d n in a U,=w w.0 m C 7 C. i.N a a)Y ; 11 y (U L=O Q D G UI N Lllm ��' V 7'f0 O O L ._ d N a a) E'+; O N a7 a. " U- .c tm N m N U C m.._ Q m i x a1 E o N " .E � a1m'ELQ GMa L ,c, ,o aa 0 , a.- i � Nw U f CON rna L c m E o N rnm Q O N CL m N N C)m'?y O i a1.p O N :N Q)++ N 5 >.,E M 3 c m e at_.� t+ o cu -- in 3 inp1m o mo 'in- m vim++ > pm""L .) o dd',� aia 4 U oj La:c'a7rio •c O 4- NE 7 7 jll. a) aO-m !Z t O N c O N. o c o CO E-0 L to+. Q,� m F-w l] N t TABLE 17 08.090—F—LAND USE CONFLICTS Tn/s Hatr{s likely o A[anPiltti Land d Use e t on f I Icts M{U=fR IILfiY N iflu \�j' 4 v ~'/ f Mt.un Lind Uus.. C These oust M.f=ttne,•im O utd - Types Of Conflicts: or snlsed. .. i✓ N c v, noise.odor,light, Land Uses a 0 %shadow > o �-t aesthetics Active Recreatioq o C privacy access Residential C Low Density safety Moderate ° • l � o 0 Density a o High Density y N Institutional MCI c Ca l—� c'� I m - o Office/Business � ..�y�� •� Eo w E Commercial , : _ <. 0 S) Industrial , aJ 71 vi Railroad 3< LO Parking Lots F s Airport and Flight Patterns I -- Collector Street � .,itenoi Street r : N X) ItTH CITY or- RANCUO �D/i �r(� rrt %4� T PLANNING DIVfSI�V TITLE= EXHIBIT= SCALE= ,!!� ,-, y Er` 44Yy LIJ e.d Jill! 0 w ' z��f U UIU d�c14Ji a1,t 1 X 11t'—_JP IR LU 1 a tl4 ' w 9� �C a cu Z OO " (9. O o �u l000 a C O7 V.O..im.. G C Ol �U U---� L O._� +a ajj L� 7 f9 Adak N to Oa. Ca a.pc v G1c mCL�Li O..p.0 O L. _C u> •U r O Q y.D 00. C) 0 a.r. O N O�r L' L _M U th @ y O C L. L s o y y L yip u� O.O a!=•✓�Q.•y. m a - Q _ O O - r_ ? 3 V a t11 7 _ C y L L N m O O .V•L L O..Q.a^.Y O. f3 cu N C d vyi ° E '^'dE Q acc� o M- :3 - C- � o Lm fo m c E G o G L o m E> 00 o - N N aj .. gym cam c >�° cQoo,aoc �cu F-o f... a.." m al N y IOU fa a t/f V a V L O d y 1- 4- y •ID •:> C c.'=� C V sV. u` N. �. In s0. E y fU m.L O.Q. G �at C _ •p�E E ^ Ly -aoE G .Gc .0L.oE ^ mO vV O V a) 0 0 0 oCCD yO c E s-'a Z," v_. N rno > aEa;o` .G+ oI `'� mo >w cL ww 0- c O G.y a U a 3a. N� [: fa p _.O>.. L - ry.O.O�a y N Q.L a0+ L .. CL. n G d� y J 0 O..O C m m m a, G a fJ : U co•Q o++.y N 9 1 O >..L N. t F L E y 4� v_.. 03 CL L d'o C.41 G 01 a U�., b am+..'". W aO.s 01 t Q. co E'- L•- ofu G fu,- G7.- c y [_ V Lajm, ajy t R O@ "D S. O,[ O -2 d y 3. O Ll. m O._ O O G O c C: C)—a V io o c._ m J E U v ,- u._U 1-3� w %INC U o tl L m LL eOLU k � . .3n�iz3sayany a p 'aa• p caXoz oz . UQ �� O C C Y a U. 7 d •;: an uaheH 4� 0, uj °u . � Nr 0 �� ,;? =a .0 71 30 U..... L `+ra N+ ..Li 4°) '7 m o C �. ,C', c � r� N� OEaci > L > °' .61=_ `-' GINyu � ^ O +-. > ra a C Vi r N Q)in'�• Ql 4. L w c N 7 i �"•' a1 a1 0 W i L - 775 3 A v � a m Qi ? >. c u C ch O u1...n C) tl1 O 2 C 7.. d O C1 a) O to p �` N .c a).E -O u u 'y `) N V N 6S (/1 C u C.O. N. EO. V Uf m y CrJ E L' N ^4. �' C f' C to 0 7 L:- C to M u- p-- a)_.... O .p.' c C Q) u U o al V C Q E U"'o N u C ' J C u y°o o m L u tn j= II L m o o ro U y? arts -:3 c fl'E u E c E 3 _E u L to d o > n Y a) a�+13 m tn m Qy a).. L++ •i p1 7 VD U m. .+ m- Q C. +� r L c—, w m a) E N m a, W > f0 c 3 s y ca ,�'� m o ra a-N L U•C � V 'C C O: Q) (U O 1 u`� y•U L c uLEtaai > r1`�e) o� °ura 3iom oui Lto 07 N O,) E Z ^'> &- u C 3: C 'u m tt7 N r i p 7 C U 0 aO.r 5 N O O O m Q v, 7 3 L a).w E m a.. Etna'� O N ra 0 r 0. a QC C 2.- > L L E m= O La. u 7 L. O i a) Qa Q) U: U m mo° Eyc tnQu0 LUUC: aQ) ny ° au > O L u to `° °' L a 7 p� ¢U.0 E s ® ® ® c ,jy l c o.= o S c o_� ndo 6 Ea a) �. m a)cu 0) ..�...'C.,..0 o f.=.+ m.ton) 7 Qr,,T, O N L L O J a0. N Q 4.. L > O �.+ 3 ++ 0✓ c m m L a) 7 E ?: O O N p N y M U a.. •L >.a 0 .�@ U C C _o C.L. u•> Q Y S y E O Q O to U a > i •u a) O. O L a) 3. r , O L >•U .N•4.0 E a Q) > m 0 a) o �3 i>a 01 rCa �m >Q:�=. � d� 0-C) f ). V O L m N. - Q) +,' O OC O >.�.L 4-. +Li'"' N O N Q 7p ° �a C d o >�„ a) E v O Q CU to M - > m E co Ck c mo+, a) p octo p dyLo �_ = 61� � CO,wM'- Ca tnu ++ Np a U c7i0 E.�'o. LV mra m Ln �� E >�� a Q._ a'niu naNi y m ..� .� > C L. Q-- m 7 ++.i m cu U L �O .Ti y Q a) 7 to N 0 a)" N O p,.+ L O m p Q U 54 m o.- 7 ° CL a) c> aa)i �tiEviQ.•o G i C_ C) .m.. U L. >. p to-Z O L. > 7 F N N C d N 7 m N d C to C'�'.'"' c1 a 7 C) Q c a) a. -0 N m. (a U �E ai .. Q> uv _ m- d L Ea tmn c mN N� cNa p U tQ C L. L to ty/1 t... _ S 7 C a a o;m D a j •y j a. OQ ro '-- m N > o.- p•-+� YO= 0- �-z V L c •O ��.p > c =.gym mE > 3w 0- u > > c may 7ym > ` o _ v 3 > o u th a� vaav � rncyv� a� � O C a) H L c E L ''� N to O m .p a.tn m 7 y C E CL MO � Q _� 0. 0. O U> p Cp (V� m m C mo co _m Qa .N a N O N •�� (- N L m X 0 _a+ O ] C C >a 3 L N N m 7i+im+i+. - c C m a) N a) a) O Mm O N L a)L m m V) a) O >=t+- 7 a > C a � t0 ° m > O 00vN=. C Y.N Q. CQY�u O� C7.O.Qa ma �� NN O auia L 3w > o in oF-•E cx) CL a t° �°-0LL m a -a*'t n o LL -0 00 Y • o u to to O ®.. N. m a) 0 4.. 7 3 y fir- Ell �, w I O O Y OQ LC7 +O It4I L X O N m m N S m iR Z7 Qs C C 8 O L7 tn N o a W 0 N o A.. `a y u c- c =✓ y.Q C d tn)m Gw�O.f' }n�,.O m Um a V L tln7 �G1_ O u. a�:3 cn L m al y Utp ,O VI. ly tn C ID q L N 4o d u C .v c .(V�` d.y:(J ai C• - C 4 C7 to U E- C 4= cu amsm C-IOU w -O C C t7 N U U y-d•�. 'y7 C per. +' C.- VJ Q � "aC n m �j3�N N oEm0"` _ a� ,^ LST� 0 �•' E m omm0 c � z� L 4 e 'OD rE " .L co m o t. am+ w v °C' C y 3',t y u m4�` s cagy cu hm t L_ io U '� m ,C G+. L. c L-° Cm U V C, c N m 31 y 0 �+ V m t0 r` y•p az.N 9 C'''' z^ {,yjN.O!c c m �.` 6 V +c O• -;p� U G) C O U C O O R L c 9u C oo_ � No C fj t� � S �o= y uL.suNa. cc_ 0 coo3 uy -:g c c� mc f- u; ii •- m O F-tL O e • cc s W�+ q l ami U Li! U In2 w'C m C . y Co�_ N U } N �f Q E�a 1 O � e 1 'f-- o 8 r2 a - I C LU 0- f� I y O o f a mmp E co g�= C) amto-jC}� Ud - (b d i OaE CQ , a) o a U U t74` O oC U o • • O to CITY OF RANCHO CUC L'4ONGA PART II INITIAL STUDY ENVIRON :1TAL CHECKLIST k DATE APPLICA::T• .� ------- FILING DATE:��/3r� � CLk�dl LOG NUMBER!j �}CGEPfD � PROJECT: g g WjShf i6 tJS iRK¢[[wrr[ R,4.V ,acTiJsU U55 �s�r_ q[N! t PROJECT LOCATION: T —1--- �b"'/vrrRi6c�o � pvyq [��,,may Df7.7tE pJnQK ; T.e�bd4rF cc�J[tiree�vrt� a [ 71�f2�7ACTrS�-V�ROP I'4/XEct� D I. ENVIRO: NTAL �j 6 (Explanation of all "Yes" and 'maybe"answers are required on attached sheets). r j ;} I'ES MAYBE NO 1. Soil_ s and Geology. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Uns;able ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? b. Disruptions_ displacements, compaction or burial of the soil? c. ,Change in topography or ground surface - r. contour intervals? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any �Uique geologic or physical features? / e. Any potential increase in wind or water erosion of Soils, affecting either on or off site conditons? ,q f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? 9. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? h. An increase in the rate of extraction and/or use of any mineral resource? 2. HydrOlogy. Will the proposal have significant results in: Page t YES XAYBE No a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction Of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream channels? f b. Changes in absorption rztes, drainage pac.terns, or the rate and amount of surface watcx runoffs +i. Alterations to the course or flow of flood Craters? �s d. Change in the amount of surface water in any body,of water? e. Discharge iltto surface Waters, or any. .� alteration of surface water quality? f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? g. Changec'n the quantity of groundoacers, f� either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interference with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? h. The reduction in the amount of water other- MW wise available for public water supplies? i, Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or seiches? B. Air ualit . Will the proposal have significant results in: 1 a. Conntant or er edit air emissions from mobile or indirect sources? Stationary sources? { b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and/or Jl interference with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? j 1 c• Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? k-. Biota Flora. Will the proposal have significant results ins a• Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or number of any species of plants? b. Reduction of the numbers of any untque, rare or endangered species of plants? pace 3 YES M-kYBE No C. Introduction of new or disruptive species of _ Plants into an; area? d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural product-ion? Fauna. Will the Proposal'have signif in: icant results a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution or numbers of any speci(\,of animals? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered-species of animals? e c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of x. animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration or reu;oval of existing fish or wildlife htuitat? li 5. F'ooulation. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of the human population of an area? b. , Will the proposal affect existing housings or create a demand for additional housing? 6. Socio-Economic Factors. Will the proposal have . significant results inz a. Change in local or regional socio-economic characteristics, including economic or + commercial diversity„ tax rate, and property / values? b. Will project costs be equitably distributed among project bereficiariesI i.e., buyers, tax payers or project users? 7. Land Use and Plannine Considerations. Will the proposal have significant results in? a. A substantial alteration of the presAnt or planned land use of an area? b. A conflict With any designations, Pbjectives, Policies, or adopted plans of any govern mental entities? c• An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of existing consumptive or non-consumptive recreational opportunities? Page 4 Ms ny3E NO 8. `Transportation. Will the proposal hav results in. a significant s a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular 3;. mOVE'n�;? l /A b. Effects oi'l existing streets, Or demand for new street construction? d. � x c. A 4£fects on existing"packing facilities, or C de mand f nd fo r new g. arkin � t5 P d. Substantial impact upon existing transporta- tion systems? s� T e. Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of people and/or :!nods? f. Alterations to or effects on present and Potential water-borne, rail, mass transit air traffic? or is g. Increases it traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 9. Cultural Resources. urc es: Wi1L the significant results in: Pioposal have a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, Paleontological, and/cr historical resources? 10. Health. Safety and Nuisance Factors. Will the proposal have significant results in: i a. Creation ohazard? f any health; zard or potential health j __ _ b. ExpoFur'k, of people to potential health hazards? C. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances in the event of an accident? i — d. An increase in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? e. Increase in existing noise levels? f- Exposure of P people to potentially dangerous ij ��• noise levels? S• The creation of Nectionable odors? An increase in l,i;zht or glare? Page S YES :!AYSE NO 11. Aesthetics, Will the proposal have significant , results in: a.. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic { vista or view? b• The creation of an aesthetically offensive site? c. A conflict with the objective of designated or porentialrscenic corridors? 12. Ucilitles and Pu�`lic Services. Will the proposal have a significant need for new systems, or ' alterations to the following; a. Electric power? b. Natural or packaged gas? /► c. Communications systems? d. Water supply? e.. e. Wastewater facilities? f. Flood control structures? of g. Solid waste facilities? h. Fire protection? f i. Police protection? J. Schools? - k. Parks or other recreational facilities? 1. Maintenance of public facili ties, 'III s, including roads and flood control facilities? m. Other governmental services? 13. Enere} and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in- a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? _ b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy? V_40 III C. An increase in the demand 'or development of ~I new sources of energy? d. An increase or --perpetuation of the consumption w of non-renewable forms of energy, when feasible renewable sources of energy are available? t. _� -- - Page '6 YES WBE NO e. Substantial depletion, of any nonrenewable or - scarce natural. resource? w� 14. Mandatory Findings of Significance. is a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the hLbitat of fish or wildlife species, cause fish or wildlife pop1ulatitn to drop below self sustaining levelsl; threaten to eliminate s_plant or aimal ',Eommunity, reduce the number or restriai the range OF a Tara or endangered plant or animal o�c elit.inate, n important examples.of the ma;lor periods of California history or prehisiwry? b. Does therphe project the ant have the +�ential to achieve shorAge of long-term, ,-, environmental goals? (A shoirt-term Impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of 'time while long- term impacts will endure weli into the future), 1 c. Does the project have impacts h are iz individually limited, but cumulatively cons-lerable? (Cumulatively considerable means that the incremental difects of an individual project are cansi,'derable when viewed in connection with the effeois of past projects, and probable future- ro F l ). d. Does the project have environmental effects- which will cause substantial adverse effects an human beings, either directly or indirectly? _ II. DISCUSSION OF EMR0,,M; 1TTAL EVALUATION (i.e., of affirmative answers to the above Mr* plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures, /� �� i I , t Pote 7 III. DETER}1�OY f. On the basis of this initial evaluation: Wi I find the proposed project COULD NOT have, a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DEC -,.., LARATION will be prepareds I � ind that although the ra osed ` effect on the iInvlronment� there will�not beuadsignificanthave a neffectt ' in this caseobecause the Mitigation '. a a measures described attached e o ti. d sheet have been added to the project. A NECATI'7Ean DECLARATION WILL BE: PREPARED. +; find the proposed project MAY haviz:�,a significa a � rvirnmeiit, and an nt effect on the Ems• P/�VAA Z'rVlT/�!L 96x is required. . .T -911 NOR Date_ atur � �'411Car�7x d�itl�t r. Title r.; { ADDENDUM TO INITIAL STUDY,'PART II FOR TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 86-02 ` f 7. Land Use andP anarmng Considerations (a) (b) as Substantial `alterations of a plan -sa land use of an area. Tho proposed amendment would alle light industrial development in a residentially planned coaVnity. In addition to the base uses established in each of the zoning districts, the'Bprsiness Park Overlay Zone would permit such land uses 'as 'custom manufacturing, light manufacturing, R & 0, light wholesale, storage and distribution type of industH al land uses. Certain ' retail and service types of" and use such as hardware stores, television and radio sales and rfpair, food and beverage sales, barber, and beauty shops are prop•'sed to be added. <<, Exhibit "B" shows potential areas within the Planned Community where: a Business Par(c`,Overlay Zone could be requested. The proposal to allow cost& manufacturing, light manufacturing and' light wholesale storage and distribution types of land uses would not be consistent With the introit of the Terra Vista Community Plan or the City's General Pl-sn. Further, such uses could Create land use compatibility conflicts such, as ;poise, � odor, light, privacy, aesthetic, access and safety.; The Terra Vista Planned Community is conceived as a series of residartial neighborhoods linked together by common recreational and institutional functions. The Planned Development is divided into four neighborhoods with the two northerly neighborhoods more residentially oriented, while the southern neighborhoods have a higher proportion of land devoted to commercial and mixed uses as shown in Exhibit"C" The purpose of this commercially zoned area south of Church Street is to provide transition uses to the industrial area south of Foothill Boulevard and transition to. the Residential Districts north of Church Street. The proposal to allow industrial uses within Terra Vista is contrary to the fundamental tenet of zoning; incompatible land uses should he separated. to avoid nuisance. FurtheF`, it would erode the intent of the Terra Vista Planned Community and not be in the best interest of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. b) Inconsistency witil General Plan and Relationship to the Industrial. Specific Plan. The City adopted the General Plan in 1981 with the purpose of setting forth broad community goals to guida the City in managing effectively the'. cnmplex integration of physical,- social, culture and econr,.nic growth. These broad community, goals are translated into specific policy,statements and specify measures to accomplish the objectives of thle Plan. Some of the objective policy statements established in the Land Use Element stated that: o 'Land use should fg organized to avoid creating nuisances among adjacent land user. o Industrial developmen,° should be coordinated to (� encourage and integrate industrial area with the ` maximum flexibility and access to a regional a circulation network. . T. he Industrial., specific Plan pr6vides nearly 4,000 acw of f developable la,,_:that is properly zoned for the type of. Uses proposed. Allowing' industrial uses away from the Ind u�: �rial j Specific Plan area boundary would erode the intent of rthis Industrial Specific Plan. The Amendment would also allow certain commercial uses within the Business Park Overlay Zane. These uses include small business retail and ser,., .-e uses, such as appliance stores and repair, plumbing shops and supplies, television and radio sales anc repair, floor covering sales and installation, hardware stores, catering establishments and similar businesses, convenience retail and service businesses such as food and beverage sales and newsstands. In e--;*rice, this would expand commercial land uses into acres not intended for these ,types of uses. This would conflict with C=ty-wide regulations of the Development. Code and General Plan which establish a careful balance oP commercial, office industrial any residential land uses. S, Transportation (a) (b) One of the objectives of the Terra vista Planned Community is to develop an extensive greenway system with trails, bikeways and sidewalks, allowing community tesidents to eliminate some automobile trips. The development of industrial projects would cause' an increase in truck traffic, which would increase the potential hazard to residential generated auto traffic,' bicyclist and pedestrian. 10. Health, Safety and Nuisance Factors (b), (c). (e), (g) The proposed Amendment to add industrial uses in a residentially planned community could have cumulative adverse impacts to adjacent residents in areas of noise, odor, light and glare. For example, manufacturing of furniture could involve the use of chemicals in treating or staining wood that might have y:,jectionable odors; or, the Research and Development could involve the use of experimental labs that could cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substance! in the event of an accident. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA, STAFF'REPORT a } u. O O z iT U GATE: October 8, 1986, I977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner By: Bruce Cook, Associate Planeer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT'13192 - LEWIS a H -- The total ' eve opment of a reside su a—W70an of 6.67 acres within - Low-Medium land Use Design4tion (4-8 dulac) w:thin the Ter;*a Vista Planned Communi ty'into 62 tots, located ofi the na.th side of 'Cerra Vista Parkway, j east of Spruce Avenue APN., 1077-091-23, 24, ,i I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCkTPTION: ' A, Action Requested; Approval of subdivision map,,,precise plot plan and boil z ng elevations., and issuance of a Negative I Declaration. B. Project Density; 9.3 dwelling units per a",re C. Surrounding Land Use and Xoninq. Korth - Single-family 0:,mes (Tract 123G4` - "Parkside", Tract 12670,-'"Oxford"); Law-Medium Residential (4-8 du/ae) within the Terra Vista Planned Commraity. South Park/School Site East Single-Family homes (Tract 12670); Low-Medium Residential (4-8 du/ac) within the Tetra Vista Planned Community, West - Apartments (Tract 12401Z, - "ParkviAw Place") Medium-High Residential (14-24 du/?tc)".wIthin the Terra Vista Plar,ned Comrtinity. 0. CQneral Plan Des nation{,_ Project Site - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 du/ac) Nctth Law-Medium Residential (4-8 du/ac) South - Combined School/Park Public Facility East - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 du/ac) . West b Medium-High Residential (14-24 du/ac) ITEFI H PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT , October 8, 1986; " TT 13192 - Lewis Homes Page 2 r 4 E. Site Characteristics The site was previously 1:4aintained as a vineyard, but has :Ance been cleared of all vegetation;, 'the property within this area slopes southward at approxir,;ately a h 4% grade. F. Applicable Reiu'lations: The Terra %sista Planned Community permits L clwel ,000 square feet minimum lot size, to ' approximately" a 7,200 maximum lot size, in a single-family subdivision in the Low-Medium ,and Medium Residential Designations. E II. ANALYSIS: 1( A. General: This tract is located within the Low-Medium =: Resi i d.e ntial Land Use Designation (4-a ,,Ada^) within the Terra Vista Planned Community. The proprlmd minimum lot size is 33,000 square feet, with the largest lot being 5,237,'square feet; the average lot size is approximately 4,000 square feet. Lewis. Haies is proposing development of this tract with their "Village Series"; e. col nation if detached and attached single-family homes.. Architecture is -if a Spanish/Mediterranean style,, combining a`stucco finish with AMk barrel style the rov'144gg. All units art two-story'.and have ' their oven two-car garage. Three footprints, each with a variety of elevations, are shown. Product types are designed to be sited as either detached or attached units. The Planning ^ommission has previously approved Design Review for the Village seri?s with consideration of Tract 13191. reviewed by the Commission in May of 1986. B. DesiRn Review Committee: In their report to the 0esign Review committee, Staff presented concerns"that th4 proposed project was not consistent with the design iintert for the Village- series approved by the Planning Commission ;with consideration of Tentative Tract 13191.. In' their review of Tentative Tract 13191, the Commission directed that the site plan shoo d employ a greater use of attached units that allows side-entry garages and creates as much open space as possible between buildings and provides a greater variety of streetscape. This direction resulted from the Commission's concern that excessive use of center-plot units on 3,000 _square foot lots resulted in a repetitive, monotonous design that was not consistent with the design standards of the Terra Vista Community Plan. With Tentative Tract 13192, all units have front-entry garages. However, the Design Review Committee felt that with this proposed subdivision, the concerns of a repetitive, monotonous streetscene could be mitigated through the use of increased front yard setbacks and an intensified front yard' landscaping program. Therefore, the Committee has recommended approval of this project subject to the requirement that deeper front yard PLANKING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT F October 8, 1986 TT 13192 - Lewis Homes r. Page 3 ,}. s1 setbacks with an intensified front yard landscaping scheme be provided. These requirements have been incorporated into the Conditions of Approval. C. Technical- Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee = reviewed the project and' etermined that, with the recomemendea Conditions of Approval, the, project is consistent with all applicable Standards dud Ordinances.= EYD. Grading Committee: The Comn.atee had concern with `the original proposal for a" 8-10 foot„high wall site along_ the westerly tract perimeter,.' The Committee felt this wall height wee too ' excessive. The revised plan has been approved by the Committee that eliminates the grade differential and provides: for an acceptable Wall height. E. Environmental Assessment: Part I of thz Initial Study has been completed by the app icant. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist. and found no significant impacts on the P environment as a result of this project. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order for this project to be approved, the Planning Commission must find this project to be consistent with the Terra Vista Planned Community and the General Plan, and that this project will not be detrimental to adjacent property or cause significant adverse impacts. It must also be determined that the proposed use, building designs,, and subdivision, together with all recommended Conditions of Approval, are in compliance with all applicable regulations in the Development Code and The Terra Vista Community Plan, IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The ly Report Newspaper, the property posted and notices were. sent to all property_owners within 3001 of the project site. V. RECOMMENDATt3N: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tntative Tract 13192, subject to the Conditions `of Approval through adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration. Ae fullyite -- I Brad Buller City Planner j BB:BC;da.k PLANNING i�QMhtISSTON ST 'REPORT ^- October 8, 1986 TT 13192 - Lewis Homes r' Page:4 If Ir ' Attachments: Exhibit. "R" - Location/Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B° - Area:Aevelopment Plan ' Exhibit "C" - Sbdivision Map. Exhibit I'D" - Site Plan Exhibit- " " - Conceptual Grading Plan' r Exhibit "F" - Conceptual Landscape Plan ` Exhibit "G" - Building Elevations ' Resolution of Approval with Conditions r..• _ r} ,fig 14 r4 jl - SITE UTILIZATION AND_NATURA;;pE2I'URES MAP r ,r, TENTATIVE 'II'RAC NO,, e� !a I.Y)ME CKY OP.gANONO GOGAMONGA A[7�.a(a7.G CO4MTY OP lAN{LNNA{O�qO -Ave OAU-e—. �...MAY' la[a .51 Y{A , ill\ „ ,�XOVgYA(q NORTH Ak CITY OI` ITEN I- RANCHO-CUCAMOGA TITLE: PL,hkNNIi\G DIVISION E1I iIBIT- __SCr1LE 4 `•� 1�� � L1t ��� ..' III 1` �� .� �•r'w �° Jam.. y fEz � v�Tif —.�..�_\.'�'j/JyJ ` w~ �q 4't �T'Tt�'K.�J �'� �7a i►�~ .I tl 7� a- ).. �MIILIKFN nVFNU! 1°, o CITY Or I I Eli: RANCHO CUCAiVION'GA TITLE- �1 PLANNI\G DIVISIQN �EtiHII3IT:-- SCALD e a �� �T, � •. t ty i r rat y rqx NAM WM r^rtrr : i FFrr ac w e m it r, + L 4 w Z eta Tn y �. e � T 1 - a '}t ip, `tqa� jL' •.L%' t ',�. \+q'l x } i ,. .if - I �'� t.• dux f8 t°�g��T° 99 t 3 t I k i!ASS 1l ASSS a yi Mp 1m. CITY or RA''CHO CUCAlLJNGA TITLE.- c.e s i� �.s��► a ax T1t�LJ y...l! s.Stt.i F sx• mz r a- c a. y P' �4i t 11 l y ti q z A V. i- CITE' OF ITEM: AlMh RANCHO CUCATMO\GA. TITLE:.- PLANNING D"ISION Grl3irtT:. SCALE: 1i `_� ,y ~.. ` � l3 fsi�. '"�`�a`..i Li'F 111 � > •�: Oil `+ \t •�..1�Vi ryYstcw�•�Y..l G t '19���' { .PJ-`� �. c1\.,� ��_`� 1 ,ti 16 5?j ��'i� f trA* .r�`� �- / ���1� �5f7'•!b'• E4 Ct y``j ;; -,F'S�l;`. `� r,•`Y y' .µmay .�1� fid r o !7 o�� zo Sk t';�a 't •� � � ,,`� � - � FAY' si" >y Cd o » u lti , ;Y Mom, 1�'VP`�`�• �+ � '\� ` '1 c y t S3 µto Ste•.� uc � I �'i: :! !` � 1 t' CITY OF 7 r I'CE I- RA' CHO CUCAI\'IGINGSi TITLE: PLANNING DIVISION L-llilBIT=- SrAl r: - q it a ',1 YI T.--1'•-� ;Fp i�3er• 1ti�t tt ai � � 1 `!. r 1. _V �� _� �� 8� p� � '• I• {mod �� j� � I '` J V 1 �1s 1 ��. 1= �C -. ��`� �� u 1, !~,•� '':fir i '' � �:�-1 E l H Lf,Lza L iLLL. F a�. L F o CITY Or ITL I- RANCHO CUCA'IVIOINGA TITLE- PLAIItVI\G EXHIBIT ne SCr�LE t m0' ape r µ r r r� m m �, 2 r CITY Oj-- PLAIVNING DI\`ISIC>,N GXI itIitT-��'�_.SCXLC- r;.if fit rM r w. i ! L ± y. }.v N ■ ■ zeN ■ 1 M ,,,.�..r.,.,�..�'� `AIRY„ ,tw... �'f���{t�t-7• �$�'�r���yr 1 � T Y 6 ID H 1 CITY or, 1 E{ RAINCHo CUCANIO .GA TITLE .- PLANNING DIVISION f\I r• L7C�CaG� k, CITE' OF, ITL3;-. RANCHO C C' -,I,'IQNGA 'TITLE- PLANNING DIVBIO`! MIi IT:IL3—SCALD tit nt7Zi 103 r.. 1 ,y CITY OF ITEM.:-�--�- i I'LANNING LAIVSION H-J.!15- El: iICIT: SCt1L k a r t r �' II 1 i i gEb 2 O m :a III I El N � CITY OF RANCHO CUCANI 'I0\Grp TITLE: PF,.��NI NING DIVISION. EXtifI3Ci% ,SCALE: I � , - Ell ®D } _ � - i�� B� �m V13Q ❑ ° p sa 9e CITY Or FLal�ti�IlZNG I3I\rISJONr r EX141BIT: SCALE- 7--� .z r z i p •� T 5 E7 -s� Ar 61 E 2 T f ❑r I crry OF ITEN1 I AINCHO CUC:ANIONGA TITLE u L k�3�iI\G D 'iCI . d ff"[6 zX!i1M T iLut._ ! S a 3# �' '~ 7Ti It`d-•� � a+ .�° ! AML r .nnon�, s d. • I� t� Cam' 13 lip M= Al CITY OF ITEN I-- ? +.• L.' S RANCHO 1�CHC� C�'Cr�AMONGA TITLE: ' F AN N Ii\G In-I't IS1ON hL7-1 F L: r BD ."V' E3D ED PD ca in gmac. n, 1-2 I CITY OF ITENRANCHO CU&MMONGA t� p {�, T, �{ t /s, �J/ �'J,', TITLE- PLANNING �I"1Vi51`J� � /T G-41r I:.�E�IYiLI�.�o SCALE- � , Mom, • ?nf Li ED SD BD 8Q � Q o , Y. ED a i N f=El m Vu Ems 0 I � e 00 w �a CITY OF ITEM: RANCHO CT.. CANIOi'rGA -'ITLE _ P rA-NNING DIVISION - EX IIBIT. �� SCr1LE- 'i < r i. IT O R�G13T SIDE EL EVATIGN ►t- �,.,� .., - EYEAA ELEVATION � cc H U nFl ` Jj �neuro..ar . 4� y G SIDE ELcVATIO FI HT REAR ELEVATION H w LU .J w • I�I�H,T SIDEELEVATIO12, N REAR ELEVATIO4 - - rr @ c NORTH CITE' OF �re1t: RAINCHO CUUiTMONGA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISION _�ZE. H[rm-�'-j�Saxu.:� RI SOLUTh1N NO. i> A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY 'OF <i RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, L CONDITIONALLY APPROVING ' TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13192 AND,,DESIGN REVIEW THERE�E, WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 13192 hereinafter "Maps' submitted by Lew`; Homes, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City,of"Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as 6.67 L acres in the-Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 du/ac) within the Terra Vista Planned Community, located on the north side of Terra Vista .Parkway, east of Spruce Avenue (APN: 1077-091-23, 24) into 62_lots, regularly ;came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action an October 8, 1986,_and WHEREAS, the City i>lanner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, ,the Planning Commission has read and considered the 9 Engineering and,Planning 17ivision's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, (HE;�EFORE, the planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows,: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 13192 and the Map thereof. 4a) The tentative tract is coovistent with the General, Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; 11, (d) The design of the subdivision is r<ot likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and ,vildr`,fe'or their habitat; (e) The tentative tr.2t fs not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large. now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision A PLANNING-,COMMISSION RESOLUTION October E, 1966 TT 13192 -,Lewis Homes Page 2 (g) That this project will not. create adverse impacts on the environment anr`% a`` Negative Declaration is issued = `' SECTION 2. `TekAive Tract Map No. 13192 a copy of which is attached hereto; and Design Review 'thet-eof, is heKaby approved subject to ail of the following conditions and the attached Standard Condil,i�As: Design Review 1. .Each lot within the project shall have a mini,mpm 15 foot (N slope or less) rear yard open area from # ilding to property line or slope/retaining wall. A final' detailed site plan �,�iich indicates all slope and retaining wail locations and'7untt plotting shall be submitted prior to issuance of building permits, 2. Front yard landscaping 1s to be provided by tsar developer. Z?.'t lot.shall ',5e provided with a',minimum of two 15 gallon; trees, shrubVery, ground cover' and lawn, planted in combination to provide a pleasing ant aesthetic environment.. A variety of landscape designs' shall be provided such that each lot presents a landscape design unigve unto itself to achieve individuality.and to fostAr a diverse and'"interesting streetsc?pe. A1T''tots shall be r provided with a permanent, underground irrigation system. 3. Street facing side elevations on all corner lots, and the i° street facing elevation for the second story of all two-story units shall be upgraded w'th additional architectural embellishments. These , architectural �G upgrades shall be included on the architectural plans and shall be subject to the review anu approval of the City Planner prier to t1ie issuance of building permits. 4. Corner side yard fencing shall be of a decorative block material subject to approval by the City Planner. Corner ide yard fencing and/or retaining walls shall be setback a min'mL-a distance of 5, frcii the back of sidewalks. The side yard between the s',deiva:k and the side yard fencing shall be landscaped and •irrigated by the developer and maintained by the homeowner. 5. All retaining wails visible to the general public, i.e., on the street ;ide of corner side yards and within the front yard, are to be constructed of a decorative material to the se-,isfaction of the City Planner. All wood fencing installed by the ezveloper shall be treated with water sealant or staining. ; r PLANNING COMNIISSMN-RESOLUTION � Goober 8 1986 TT 13192-- Lewis Homes i 4; Page 3 6. A six-foot high masonry wall shall be rrovided along both Y the kst2rn tract perimeter (Lots 1-IP) and for 'those lots that abut Terra Vista_ParKway (Lots 12-22). The wall treatment along Terra Vista Parkway shall be consistent with the existing design along Terra Vista Parkway and ' shall be submitted for review -3nd approval to the Planning Division prior to, the issuance of building permits. ,i,andscape hraintenapce ease,;ients will be required where perimeter walls encroach onto private tots, '( Tare to be dedicated on the Final Map. Final planning, i`�jall fences r ,I f and the locations of all easements>are to be determined prior to the recordation of the Final Map. 7. Each driveway shall receive special treatment in order to enhance the appearance of the streetscene. Such treatment may include band of brick, special concrete color, or border treatment of like materials. The driveway E hardscape detail shall be included in the landscapetirrigation .plans subject to,' the review and approval of the City Planner: 8. The submitted' plot plan shall be revised to show a 20' front yard setback for Lot 7, and• a 25' front yard setback w for Lot 18. 9. Provide stucco return walls between units to be consistent.. with building exteriors. 10. At least three different shades of trim color shall be provided. A complete color pallet shall be provided for the review aid approval of the City Planner prier to the-, issuance of building permits. 11. The units on Lots 51, & 3? shall be attached to provide a larger building setback for the unit on Lot 51 from the - rear property line of Lots 48-50. 12. Greater front setback variation shall be provided on Lots 51-56 along the north side o° Street I'D". The intent is that setbacks vary±5 feet. Tentative Tract 1. Terra Vista Parkway shall be constructed from Spruce Avenue to the last project boundary as follows with the first phase of development a} Full improvements for the north road bed. opening at "A1l Street b. Full median including landscaping` with onl;• onej . l i PtIANN`ING COMM11*10 f�RESOLU i iON October 8, 198E 7 13192 Lewis Homes Page 4 { c. A minimum 18' wide pavement for the so+atfj.�road bed to include drainage control -devices such-•as an A.C. berm, ditch, curb, etc., along the south edge of is pavement as approved by the. City Engineer. APPROVED AND ADOPTED ;HI5,8TH DAY OF OCTOBER;, 1986. PLANNING"COMMISSIOW OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Bu er, Deputy secretary _ { I, Brad Buller, Doputy Secretary—of the Planning 6mmis6bn of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that,the foregoi�g Resotut cn was dul,%and regularly introduced, passed, acid adopted by the P ann.ng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,- at a reguidr meet�.ig of 6,, Planning Commission held on the 3th day of October, Y'B5, by the following v�'te-to-wit; AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COV.MISSIONERS: ABSENT: CO;'4ISSIONERS: i! f _ `l ;E. ^'..►• ^'^�aC LNO 4 L wL W >q U 04.� �. NyW /{ O • O g r__..�1\�. mr4�a�.b�..ukn ���"�Y,'^.aa Y� a..�iq «Y•' q.cLo.a� �� o qa: .Yg► b",,�� �o11,,y a',�� �� , `..� b>yY ►v�'O�� OC6CL l..b^6� fCl �a•= �4p qP�`y q -ilk O G`T tyi �b�YN Laµ tN.gV� L► L i:Y} tiY a�.V ►N t .�. '%aaN �� �'� � et+h«^•� L: boPM'� ,,.^� .oc � 4J �t gp tc►�o��;y, yaa`d0. e.o cXT cd xca`a tva •q OCyr a+�.Niu2�$.. CY�YO uV b01^q >»�' U.�=Nr q cv� c�..y Nco �. AqM �C .yCO q�SC �.Np PO aq y-YO^Y >.ggpy r LbN OY YG=,►O C � !Cr ., YO.aV V ..Ova` .. r q y 1. j tV!C�►�tr 0 �C V G�•'A y. N c�C G Ln O L C a ar..aY��e u v t�4� .. M CVL B'�^nYY .r Y'@ i.)c b`•' � L 011 r�4V to b c CrG+s40 C> a�� J YO d� VMS yC N �.YVG bVIY'� •p y D>M j.4�i L N rr yy YO L p ,G ►N G—Y�O.bAw}Y.ri i.` o �"OP7S C .[L+ : .ti g. KOmO I. CL OV Y m I k ' w y .YC OC O Y•u q L L 021 O r 00 q►NA o a u r 5 v-B oia uc •O � ►V pa:.Y � r Y Y.J =b 0 b b y Y It ag 'rd'a J y FF t �Vy N y +'... OM q@O 2--WE t � L b C ^ > aL O V►y y Y q V ... -C A l S R .L• > > b 3' U Vb Y'•'S. TZ C4 t s Q7( 1-a2 .08-�8f6 r�C Ag 2n�a . i< d� '.,< TO ay o�c Ned imdw aoin 7 oEslr u b :o' n� o aSN A u • Gy4 GO pio co YyQ U tENV w _a Sw asAdibk r A uy.O dtaO Lpq E OHO � aNOt 2. O .6r Aav dYOY 6a ua - QN N. -l0. 6y E rn� C f E b �6A GLOAO:� <�m aaT�^ G3" .•-, .C.._nL � N..Ld Y rn L w w'T OL N V ar E d;O m O N Oja"_.3 6 li i 4a 0HaTT y a L tig .+ gr •-n a L N L o x Y` a t 0 ^O � T d Uy p O U N 6 U w T�5 d L Z yo dL Oaq E D 4 q C XFr.. r ^.qN EO• ya Y •y J :'q .r y i S T•.�y T. N�c N r L}v v C E�"> •+ px O_ a. '•O_ W F H a O.dO 3'Yi•y d^. w b� A cy0•L >t Q NM L N z A N L Y zz VOQ <f d OE>Y wiq. FWy—Im LY �a'y�t NC Si C O A x dr9- � rn Rt a r YQL.t- N Ar ar^. p a N� 6 AOOd OYg yEEN< LD Yf J.. a 9 eE w < < mC10 T OYr_O Lw .OE am C Y r• 3p pl AO p � N � O a p OC uY a� d•C 4L�C C 9 TO CY d O yA.'O G i< ue f -tea .24 2�T o c..ur c�u TQo in.,'+oTT aQ> a .�xa o cz a0 L �.L x EEaOT1 aL 04 O d< _ 1 Q E.a d 6 N V W•C IR r.N N L.x 2 N m ti � L 2 a y<�6. O T ad+ N C ^�"� V � T� A •�K Tt!O.R � .a+ .n •T•.0 d � A 1 na ar oA �i mq ..._ rxoeLN ci u2,_ r 2s yT Y.y TN AE yo y • N i�E•.1< r��^iN-. '•T:CV.p..=.C.^ RrdN- aC4 4. VL c,Epa7. y+ CEO O C•NON .q y c u do A a dmm., •^ Nu a 6 Fi d v N.` M •+ Y < N O a g L .y O Y O`a E Q2<-i Ny C drnC NY Y p aio co.>. o s ma A aoa Y I--.GO Y d P O C L V H 6 6 U •� q2 dWN ^<• L.V C d� 2gaOra L3 O�C L aO•�C CI U 9�h W9 a .LNO K•� ,•_ _ L n x. a O doa0 ad.0 J a d d a i ^ Y b• >L < G E O�• • A.61 ^ n^ 9•.._O y.C O�4 d A C L U d N d G H� YW Ol LOLL. L q A Ua Otq as O� C T a E a 2 y C a 1=A r NON F i w • a o E..V L Y 1� T 4 � a�.¢ d O O r A t •C. A d p 0 ?t Y G a Q Aa,cq N6 1L-r NGA Q�.N..n 49 OLdT prdiUp wt[dJ=Uvpi d OEn R•Y. JYa aW 2.�a OI.-24 �:.�.f[N. H V1.. h7 f G u fl.t awaL ,���qs 4=,-_ •_0 aLi `ax .-v ^aPi N,ucn G%aai aqu mac. i •ni L6G N O ^ �L tr•A v :4 q *�O S '.Gi P U., 4 U +Gt..^ P.•"V',. U ro d L ".a dam'6 4 y,... �,�N •k O. O„ Y A F G P b N G n N OJ �.L O o D i k Y G O � so o G Gp °•.� qQ N$rym pLu.� a... ao � o• � o Gt4q uUi � L �� L.rG D.b G 04 pN. .G vR O EN GA V V� N.ty Y. 4P^Va..C.= NN�C 4 �•� ^9U:0 p6L'1 Grti NA. p� 1r SNP P'r MO�Ab r-LT~r�... «C.b. aL - N L U N u 1 4 O. _ u L »r.O • q M d ^C.qrC- LG 1 ¢t0 ANC PR SQL NaGb DUF,q E.L 4 tb La A. �GN O. UI'LMH v� UNq 7 t GL CO• CI. n 6u p..CIRR Wy��R � r � F AV LL W� YR� ayL QL Gay RRO�N�00. �rN p~ N� N �.. A Oy. yY- odoa. Glu G NG »- a• c a r o 0 ��wwe ¢N.- ¢N sNc '=n.c 4ni nu.-...m>aao.oo. �n•.ao: ¢u �.. nn. O\ N n1 I m r G %a n, Rac cc o q a. AaCVR ^Y _.-ZQ E N y Y Uaw FQ- GCw GD u� M.•-,4 :... LQ^\ G A 1 6 a o G p f • u~i q9� � �q �� V. n OiG a..,. •p«R aa+y uC� 9 ,3 0.K O� '�E l rr P U 4'� L �'e p •"L G m� C y p N A p O� tt 1.f1 p P P�O N Nd q E 0C3 ig".� �L. �pLC aG 4L �.. •r. R Yy ' Ya -GPq n RLRRµ �'s. qpZ �rl!�'d`tYp r� 4< uO P R LN Ua aGi.V. CRA 6 OGc iit' �P a•q � at GUp N �d�a. N9 Lr p S> G vM as L4.�a vi MbT OaY Zh q U <F4 �4p V.•G- C4� YP q Cr ~q �.. Gti�n a`�pG GLy U T J � NUO. r�u Rq AN= p•n U^ Gu R�q iO«=+. »p4 YA ;�. cVou L O..N �+V G LV IS n C v U C N G't O u uuuL �uEJJ .GE t ..E .+yn � 6LV ^La. c� n•tiYAL s 0Ai q P K+G+NO 4.m 1.N���. C9N �O.N <U C4 1-P•Oi•w q q G 4N.6gd W�.6�N✓4 a A Ass a�� rpy C� hit.; ae{ Abe 2 E_t+ 6 q q q `r pp q.; N • O Y q Nth rN .�9 N J O iy O O CTO. - L o d E �y E BE -UT "• i p^T ^C E ?.Z �E. Y .`p o6 E u .�L c p p ago 4y =u Le> yy u�9T c.N O 1-2 amd dL iu op'O o Ogg- LXNu� q� � w_ c> o nE r N auk Yp;b V ' N N t o pp - �_•, E V j O L-N 9 J n~p C L I. b: i = L V... C S O NMI cxn vY 6� u u Lin N E �pq c T , m9 L E O n U q d p O u O E ^o E A {J .UC G� a 04 �U C tl 9 J L d O. db It! oft C O N y�J d U O q E a O G m ,by Z;- d y>o... C L u q .+ J O.L:.O- q S '. s"a �.0 o0 LN W C q gaorE O yG0 �9 X`_ai nY 4a u U.9J o vp aoga., Npp { CC `S 1- E C a u o C.�a E n d a T u 9 Z .4 :NEa L• C d.EO >>rOU T a� CO uir JEd=I r N o ... :U3 V qt L9 aa. aCa m Sim'. Lop.E 9NUa < ECU 2 EU Oy L O y J 'J o bo G.CyN O as T4. N N _ q G = n iO C�N V" 111. u E n a 6 _ ¢ a O . N d L 9 N L y. C $' F•Uq ; ni S:ILLN6 O.Ua FI > > y ^.W a E A �. �.O u.0 .c O EOM y N a J.O• � U w OWN W 09N Y Ofi O a 5-6 ^ O uu �ULI omit IS q d 9 V N E 9.0 L M.r. q 0 9 qrho EM 'c+. aT o�n 6YT L. OL+ Lqa i0 qab-. U q_ VO N p9 C. qu i.^ .-.0 > n ua a .�.. 'uq se a.:'vq as. a �' > °'Z 'au rn. .�T, o":y '^LA X=.- L i.C.> Z. .gyp ^6 Cc r Y y y O y E q t As >j C 9 C M N C ++A E.�.r 9q C U q 9 Tva « d � u L Ay C a z wu E• 2LC0 Cw=i COT � y y A Mn 00. O COI od .. C A 9 a E�p «a OLr4 O— O J U p.'� 2 d 'p :5 n91. E go E - y ems.�, 1..9 L Z. dL o L 9 9 C Y 6 EE n L `y TY a 2 G ? 1. d T S y N ~L �N t.4 IN N C d. - pro,of=ja dN61 O..EG �.� L gngys uQ �.q .Q.yi�'L. T y E •� qLO Ha q•n C q L y v q q-aY. J o !y N V 3 0 p q � d 5 - y u q •� Y X� C E a y.^. J d U v� 9 dwui d�9 OTC. 2 �T EE co^'^ 6 Ldli La q CC at o X9 r. C 0. j q4. L uNT N.X G Haw �C q.. q u.• U q oy U c Etp L .N U q .r EO a•r0N d a �q 9L^W r yy� 9 d= �.. OiL by OEEGr L End Y ..C.. '2 jr Mix ¢ FqM q+ Kt•-m gill Y U WIC WES Ralli.V.. . �.�r �p OT�Y'C NriL s C a NPa C w+p ,y��VjjAft q0 6p p0 A b� jYy L �G� N Y y♦ L D qD .n d L Y.E d O d A ♦ DL � L C d N " aopD +.e-�ziO !I Mcs q` x � a E vN O1va ♦- Z- o p • L a xC �'r..ELEp^q ^qCL wN O O A O `d a. O qap W^Y. 4•N m W S C: C v - C. ?.� LaYie B .^ or• w � YN S bCo.-d E}..o-.. .. N i•�Y yu u..T.. u c a Z L n d p a^' a n '•q L` Gs.'.. CV q0gZ pdN J ^ d M G iy ^ d d�pA b.6 NBC 'm g-- 40.0 O�q G Y ApL v2 o Lc ^ O bfdx d p.. L- w Q99, r v ai a o oru'♦ c+r .... uv c a. c.P+.nL.c. a u Iz 'LL• •�NyI �n t 2 w ^u G L d^ E C 6u d W E o u « rn s G y6 q`dn Fz =y^D V Y ^ C q d=L z^ as l a d q V C1 Y +ram G d q ^ cb72 V O aU E� �N pA d Qa0. YO A EW ^..V bl N:.q=9= E ^Y 6 y Q Ern 6.60E Y lo d d E.^ "♦a bU'` bo.. �p3 0.Y auPi C 0.V-L-L yt 0.0 � O. by NL O VC O , LT yCA n- OL N ECE c x O O Nd T G d^,. Tq `V f Cv rnE 4 ^O D ox dN q.: b Y € p u q x - P ? WNb mu 9 q0 Ny 0.q m0 du q LLV•e1^ QgAO Via. iao n.x ¢Y ¢a. ¢aru u 14 0 A , i J 1 '89. w f1 LAL as � Y Ui.Y d a. ,u C:Ot♦ N4 a♦L.L _ aOapV � H N d C �.0 L �- vCw TU ads N EV _�.. N Ypp 1. � ��i n S � ��N 3 � �A �❑� G 4 N N 4 "h qC7 C^ =D G. EsAi GD, Vb. GOr M ,AV '4•�L�iY UO a wC U ^TN T FvAN Z9 Z;ez— tt2— rsV ti� Uy DCG pC 4D AAAu d ^rl'^ L �Nu a ti�4� Ayap gw rod 5vy+t NN D{ bC>d CSIw yVr. G C C1f N VEb RayM a xbY N s L rbu aOran L 2 Z�d S Q YaN wy •'� C^ C V 7."Z N L upt aY. C g �eN""a e,a,« h O+u inro. 4}.+L+ a<t o.+C- W«w i•iii a'va ,a Iza A H r4 F r A.N U VYyN G v.1 D }r y� V b �N ^^ yE p?a .Am�A y1r C ^ ^j C4 �a L Aft N C CO ap ^a 4C 3ro E: h-� O 1( L 'aYN G 4 Ned 4y _N rY_xe6 'u E �.�^ y v pF� C.-.0 V C C E Of nL ^� Ci 4 iD Y ra. v6 O Vz my Hw y^u 2;; e.N w x :a v •ib..� �,: a.. a nY aaV+:S ua u u. N.Y`7_' C •• uu C C L L uA.C�D W R L 3 yr L Ll LD A y IG I L it N 6 C O a p n p y uE E � u gaLii NC O C W O. y Y a Oz U u V 79T i W L � wiA nu DNC n. % v H no Klu d < o �N9. '9u S• p: a3 'uy N C L 6 t 9 y L p �2 d C�J EQE N q q d O.,,r O1c w e q3N ag1U LN Ldy. E 4� LA~,p 6Na .y9� 6 .7D Gam.. ..C. C' W6 4G 1-� I 1tJd 0 G a L L M �+ L i� n N Y C y 6 u D L y V Nn =i v c a W HTp L N LY T - �� ' �Y-p. Q G u V V d 3 a L o C}pqj tb g UO 99 y p Oc 'O L p n q y V U d7 y C Y 64 d A b m CITY OF RANCHO CUCAmom-A Gctca STAFF REPORT C' O N DATE: October , 1986 � e� z { � > TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission isri } FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Joe Stofa, Jr., Associ..Ite Civil Engineer SUBJECT:; MODIFxCAlItiN TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 84-09 - IS"" A Request to modify a condition of approva regarding j completion of Los Cedros Avenue and Larrera Street with 1 modified col-de-sac improvements. AFN 227-06I-65.23 J I ABSTRACT The Developer is requesting thfi' modification of the project condition requiring completion of the stub streets (Los ;r Cedros Avenu(3 and Larrera Street) with cul-de-sac improvements as required by the City Engineer Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission uphold the City Engineer's requirement which is consistent with previous Planning Conmission policy. II. BACKGROUND: The project was conditionally approved by'the Planning Comni Sion on August 22, 1984.1' The Developer's letter requesting the modification of the cul-de-sac improvements i5 attached as Exhibit "A" The project consists of a church facility and meeting, hall located north of Victoria Avenue on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue in the very low and low residential district of the Etiwanda Specific Plan.. Los Cedros Avenue and Larrera Street are located east of and "dead- end" into the Church's east property line. &hibit "D" contains photos of the existing stub streets, III. ANALYSIS: It is current City policy to extend temporary "dead-end"' stub streets upon_futLo�e development or finish the stub streets with a turn around (cul-de-sac). The installation of a cul-de-sac serves the follfting purposes: 1. It allows traffic to turn around without pulling into private driveways or making several manuvers within the public street. 2. It allows City street sweepers, which require a 241. radius, to sweep the total curb length eliminating possible debris build up in corners. ITEM I Tr+; Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission SJBJECT: Modification to (<<nditional Use Permit No.. 84-09 - Ishii DATE: October PAGE 2 I) 3, It provides a finished esthetically pleasing appearance to the, -:end of the street. u Exhibit "E" shows ,the standard, design turn around as currently approved or% the project improvement plans. An alternate design t}p the standard is also shown on Exhibit "Ell for' the Commiss;,on',s consideration if it is decided that the standard design is not appropriate for this project. Exhibit "F" contains a photo of ,aln existing street which has been completed with the modified-standard design. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission uphold, the cul-de-sac requirement per the Condition of Approval for C.U.P, 84-a and deny the j modification request. Respectfully submitted, BARRYE R. HANSON R Senior Civil Engineer Attachments: Exhibit "A" Letter of Modification Request from the Applicant IT" Vicinity Map "C" Site Plan "D" Photon of Existing Condition "E" Approved/Alternate Design "F" Modified Cut-de-sac RONALD S.ISHII&ASSOCIATES ARCKITECTSIPLANNERS 3870 SCHAEFER AVE."A" CHINO-CA 91710 (714I 591-6579 a i RECCIVED- CITY OF RANCHO CLICAIdONGA '{ PIEQEIa LETTER PLANNING DIVISION a 22 September 198E AM SEP 2 3 IyOU PM PLANNI4G DEPARTMENT 17A91101114121I.121314 tO P.O. 80X 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 ATTENTION: Dan Coleman' Project No. 516-8791, Cucamonga i & 4 wards Upland:Ca. Stake, Rancho Cucamonga, California Re: Deletion of Mini cul-de-sac requirement We request a modification to Conditions of approval. Specifically condition X3 of CUP 84-09 requiring the two streets abuttipg the east property line, Larrera and Los Cedros to be completed with a cal-de-sac ' improvement.:- In lieu of a mini cul-de-sac we are requesting completion of Larrera and Los Cedros with a concrete curb across the end of each street with necessary reflectors as required by the City Engineer. Trusting the foregoing to be of sufficient inforgltion. Sincerely _ R 0 N A L D S. I S N I I aE ASSOCIATES, INC. Ronald S. Ishii Principal CITY OF RANCHO CUC.ALII ONGA' MU:DEyr- l2 ENG G Ii .SIGN �I' : J-3 �. .. '. _. �..: w ...a.... � :.. :_V.% �.. '-.� 1, .. . .. � -..' i'rW;R�'•.7.f•-,�•.54*c a K!': ..r'� • .r. v 37 a i m irk- Hills ------------- ,. Sri, �; { I� ,' '`r �-- ` 2 i an c r 1:D.M Z '53 I� � 111( l ���._7"' �n•C• ICI► - 'vla IGw-fin' mc �\ m n 1..4.. - �r CJ==OOa!O.Ilnsi( e Orr 1 141 a L _ I G t �:. : ✓%/,STREETS TO RECEIVE DEAD END 7yMpRO4EMENTS Crff O N RANCHO CUCA1VfONGA TITTz.-- E-2 Lktsl� ENGDt EEG DIMION n; IL ��+�}��fn�a' ! t ��a. ��' t ;;yam, i*C',• �. ""—Ilka a-"��a in�y�t�,{ Ye'r'i„� �.� '•''%'Sx � �,�iyti �'.+. - "�; sA i # r I a%D H � LL cc CC CL CLIN �a �y OC uj k. w Llf .. Q u.� C a ;rvrz- �m u1 .� ._ z 3:^7 : loll.d �! �ryN...�• yq.. • f a CAs7rRo Lu • s CITY OF MAE P w• i. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Cvcnnra STAFF RV.-PORT Cj DATE• October 8, 1986' 1977 rn= Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City,,pjl nner BY Scott Murphy, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 86-02 - COMMUA`b�1Y BAPTIS C URCH = A mo i ication to a prev7()us y approve Conditional Use Permit -to allow the use of two temporary trailers as classrooms during the construction phase of a . 5:4,0Fl square foot expansion of an existing church facility in the Medium Density Residential District located at the northwest corner, of 19th Street and SeryY - _ Street, - APN: 20I-221-08. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action 'Requested: Approval' of site plan, elevations, and modification to the Conditional Use Permit for the use of two temporary trailers. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoninq: North Temporary refuse u'm f;%-ility and Foothill Freeway right-of-way; Low Density-Residential (2-4 du/ac) South - Single family residentiaVand vacant, Low Density Residential (2-4 du/ac). WCest - ' ingle family residential; Low Density Re--*,�ntial (2-4 du/ac). 1 Apartments; Medium Nigh Density Residential (4-24 i du/ac). C. General Plan Designations• Project S to - tdadium Density Residential (`4-14 du/ac)., North - Freeway right-of-way. South Low Density Residential (2-4 du/ac). East - Low Density Residential (2-4 du/ac). West - Medium Hish Density Residential (14-24 du/acj. D. Site Characteristics: The southern portion of the site is currently developed with a 10,500 sq. ft. multi'-purpose 5uiiding and 79 parking spaces. The (orthern portion of the site is currently undeveloped. MAE ITEM J PLANNINO.,COMMISSIQN STAFF REPORT Modificat;on to CUP 86-0? j October 8, 1986 Page 2 i II. BACKGROUND: On July 9,, 1986, the Plann;.ng Commission approved ` Conditional Use Perrrit 86-02. The approval was for a Master Plan for the church expansion that would be accompflshed in two Poses. The first phase will: consist of the construction of .uiiding B (5,400 sq. ft.), which contains a fellowship hall, small kitchen, and additional classrooms, and additional 25Z parking spaces. The second phase will consist of the construction of „ Building C, an SOD seat auditorium, and Building D, a 4,50 sq. ft, gymnasium. An additional 160 parking spaces will also be, provi4ed to bring the total to 41.2 ,parking spaces for the entire site. III. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is proposing to use„two 24 x 60 modular tvailer units as classrooms during the construction phase of BrAldin4,-2- The classrooms will be located in t-ae approximate area that ltuilding C and D (Phase II) will be located in the future. Thy trailers ;will remain for 24 mort.:s� IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the General Plan and Deve op3 p-mept Code. The project wi-11 not be det.imental to adjacent prop;.rties or cause significant; adverse environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use and site plan,' together with the recommended Conditions of-Approval, are in compliance'with all applicable provisions of thE� Development Code and City St.;;idards. V. CORRFSPONDENCF: This item has been advertised in The Dail Presort new5pape'r as`a Public bearing and notices were sent to a i property owners within 300 feet cf`the project. site. VI OMMENDATION: Staff recommends tnpM' the Planning Commission -wfl the modification to Conditional Use Permit 86-02 through Cn of the attached Resolution with Conditions. Res tfully su :tted Brad 8 ler City Planne, BB:SM:ns Attachments: Exhibit "A" Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Master Plan Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Letter dated August 11, 1986 Exhibit "E" - Photos of Trailers J Original 'Resolution of Approval for CUP 86-o" Resolution of Approval for Temporary Trailers .' r ii< F 4 '-v 7uw .r a•nu.-�Mr�.a L.r.s./ � I � � i1t` 71 '.i,R... � a � F�� s,.`�*�•=`ram\, r �]' :`'��., a�. ., . a X.1, 3 �'ty 2\ \ [��r ��.4 R.',Y[1 ♦f of _� � r�� ••`��� !"T{ILL-. .. _ Noxm CITY or, T ,T_ rrEA t. RANCHO CLC{VV10T1rA TrrL.Es PLrS..'VNING MrSION EXHIrrr. K l l Ire. ` WIN i -c-rr 'E NORTH CITY OF cI r ti t: P - ,R. Fu , ITC O CUCAMONGA. TITLE-A� PT.AIVNI\ J EXHIMT--_8 ,�.SCALE- r-� If�?i i11 1ItI1 PI?IG!► {t'� IEEE Mill o r. Adh NORTH CITY OF rre� :1���' �� • RANCHO CUCAMO GA TrrL,E: PT \xrltfyr t Rid 7c•{1� �YU 12�• -- -"''r—'41 r• CO6V MUN,ITY BAP'8't 11RCH OF A�.'i'1 LQMA. 90901at t$treet Alta,Lpma,fiA 91701 97141987.8594 ` August 12 1986 i City of Rancho Cucamonga a Planning Conmissi n. P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91730 Gentlemen•, This,letter is written in support of our'request for a conditional use permit for temporary modular classrooms to be used until completion of our next building. , We would like to use these ten*povary classrooms in order to~•provide needed classroom space for our Friday evening and Sunday morning services as well as mid-week meetings for various groups.. We are asking for two 24x60 units providing fou,. 24,30 classrooms., The additien of these ,�. modular units will allow ourcongregation to continue to grow during the construction period. We would like to request these temporary units for a period of 24 months, `- and plan to remove them upon completion of building B of our master plan. "Lhi.s master plan was approved for a conditional use permit on July 9, 1986_ Respectfully submitted,; Robert E. Logan sekior Pastor REL/lc Zhu '~`�4+ "fit`- *3'N,ii+ntta�fi}Cww}nomatzi/fgtr�`�a1n tR�t\17µ.gtuvf _ �*w � � 2� �� a3tY, '�,Ca < �,h..� °�...x,ty#+ r t.y #•7" yy",y h e ,4't4-re y��7,`>S t�•}�f �3'.�i l��T?A4- .+'�ry� ,yl,t�T'�, u'"t.�'�IY"''2�� t�� a .r•*..u-, ^A�.�` �yy''''�i`�`�w"�"i "�s� j�.+ 's ��vy^ �.}�„���,�a�y"t+,�'P+C�'n ;i� x � � ,. ��`- ty/��r�fd'. xy:Tc ��+#7''yeL'`•r.x� ��n.71„r � �j w,�v� 7��'Y++ '. �.n.}*. .� {tPt f'." �,r y ,,,�,. i'"'.iat47�.'.�✓ �.,L�r�"'"j�t :��ttw e,.,� "~•3�� 4�x +F"�x�' C�. �Z`-• w..�. .�?,t' a�3C:w•�.A' .ly .,��:.t, f.T.�4\(A, r:�.�r, �'.3.?�Vk.F,rqS"";:v.4'.``^: tr�� t S � a t r �F q� f3.��k �iC+4� k � �tWj,:�K� # •1" rC.,: ,,``i:,e x ; '`��.��� +��{�.?�'�,�a fy'� �-. �wl ✓�Y :i 4�-'hR J�e ,s 1 r`. �+x+•i IG�1�Yr Ylr�n�Y�. J'••'T2..��ir�+�TST.isi6��i�r�fi L 5` r, It n RESOLUTION No. 86�94 -2, S SOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUC.4MONGA PLANNING ,gQMMISSION _AFpROYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-02 FOR THE COMMUWITY BAPTIST CHURCH LOCATED AT THE N9F.THWEST CORNER OF BERYL STREET AND 19TH STREET )T ';JHErA1DlUt+l DENSITY: f RESIDENTIAL. UISTRICT WHEREAS, din the 5th day of April, 1986, a complete application was fired by The Community :Baptist Church for review of the above-described project,, and " 14 WHEREAS, on the 9th day'of July, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga planning k Commission held a plrblic hearing to consider the above-described project, NOW. THEREFORE, the Rancho�Cucamonga Planning'Commission resolved as follows: ,. SECTION-1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accorc' pith the General plans- the objectives of the Development Code,='and the purposes of Vie district in which- the site is C. . i o.,a Wed. 2. That ;the proposed­U$e, tigether with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be i�etrimd'ntal to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious ,to properties or improvements in the / vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environmen an iat a Negative Declai^a•tion is-issued on July 9, 1986. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 86-02 is approved subject to e o owing conditions and attached standard conditions: PLANNING COMMISSION "DLUTIO1 I110. c> CUP86-02 - COMt 01411** atFI IST CHURCH July 9, 1986 Page 2 Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall enter into ,a lien agreement for one-half the cost of undergrounding the overhead utilities fronting the project site on 15-th Street and for one-half the Cost of undergrounding the overhead utilities on the east side of Beryl Street, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 90f DAY OF JULY,, 1986. PLANNI OMMISSION OF THE CITY OP RANCH(Y CUCAMONGA BY: ennis L. al man ATTEST: f r J an fir, atr ; I, Den Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Plan`n,Lng Commtssi n of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the fore oinD Resolution.was duly and ' regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of theCity of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning-Commission het`i an the 9th stay of July, 1986, by the following vote-to-wit. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, 14CNIEL, CHITIEA, REMPEL, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE r ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE \ v 0 6.v L q V o Cr V+c+u nvk L t dG L =. aqw D_.n c o .L.n ry qaE=6 q.ENsY rY _ _ G A O V a b C Ay V r His: Oquo nce a. .`a �..N. sm.ai nPu.D F UEV MNOq IK.A ti` a a:dO N> E E f yGG .O E.E4 YO.cq "' STcw � .�..o AUK cyi y' n g N C S5.G N' On K E n.p NV LO OLL.N\\ n,C 6q� Eqa� NE ^La Aa�.� O'LC'O E O u 4.N C W E y. LLtiV G ql U �� C... yV gi .. tb+•Y q o9 S N L q 2.� ?� F O G y N >.�y C N�Y 6`n L O p D w+ ' 1 FE ♦ 'b O O^ �G n \ i � NV u i 6GN �OTG W \\i`iJ•JJVVV\\\17J7J7J7\\\ W �• O cNOOSnLCLN - J O'NVGdy pl uT SVo h A l/�``GG{ Y u N E OV O`UaV PC a l _ c aye C n^ E V m^ L a t K O V a tt�� cquN E Oo 7• C 9� End n 2 Ln o q O RE u 'a J c a^• l\q'7f7 b O u.•O RO V p'O' E •Rt� 6q R 1 A s o p.L a — °•o �pLy.. nc a d c N e 4 - y. uo n`p.. �.=..~o,,i. .c�u p `n„Y• Tz— azi,p CJ b moo. co'mi a.c n '.gav_u :e ^d.:. R •� rnq c S aca0 u n V.., •' ^b pS En w�O dC�:r O �m�E Lc.. `"' m.G ^ •�"C� Lvgi� v b d Na q y y.9a 30� c a loe a n'u u �^c : u q.� d p N CN gypE} a �r' Ci n.� c EEab M.dp ].Q ay p�aa R.O. ]jW EL q UO VLb a�0 C�cLV C� p y p C Y VA y gg•�m Gb U. L C�G QO n� LV�drL Y u E� a. L cE 2^n 9a pin L n dL�6 3L V a c 1 yb bq c•' C N u d VI«�ci•t L`7.1 uCi uup G Q V N V •�:6 W mow.._ �p .� q Y ci LO^d Ny: TCV N �� N'O V^•L.• n SpE p•= L c,.o �•- L n ` .o q �U. ��y �A ^V4q NNLn V.� pb =.L•..BO NM'•.o u o.�q ,ec ��^ L^ bT�.aLd :nL>q� " �¢ u w •' n v c c'^� Myi e^ u$�' ocQ }o cm N f. o m•_qc �'^^c9 a�.oB ,. n d q C@.p-. 6.E C q p N y d L• _ i n L V p L C o u p = ^ d S 2 b�•S n y 2 b q Exti E.- is 60 p N L Qa npd 2�~ SNp Gav � Wb. `O V Y.^ b 6 .� C K a• O H O Jnc LV `ptL L A.Gqub-7 En.L,dc• y •L' c E ...be - rt d,cr 1` E E L q� � t • w.. V p .-.= a aq b L.q Oy c - Sl V b u b C aL•o.S t --Oi N'2� p•p. 3'•s a r u V .O q n p c+u G L ^ •^ EVV V LAN • N..�v c �Y c b q tY O E t ON pl c 9Vu p L cp• E 46p Tp � LL 47; d E Lp d u p «n f-L.noq c.-.,.a d o ''• noaun ux zz C•.5 ;5:5 o E 0 mw w NCq ^gQgd f� yw • ti 1:I.M ! % -22 p = Cv C OV, b • V C p ' L vn, r1 COy OO G C p. V t vp bl. V� M Oii. p• C.H u b. C q.> fiLLc` A wC Cp4Nv•L•^ ,.� ...b u..o tea, e� u>,.e G �'^qc eLM� Go ago 0 oqu ayL a�.. eb c., z i.- 1 a Npc V r vv uu 6 6 f9.i c �Lb Lt c � •.o 0 0� n Y6N .5O C - 4V �N r HV� O �q by W M py N �.� u u o ��+ {J p o u 4 E 4V O- vP L Lu •- E a o p c zz s`,V Aft 'i - bb Nq 6u G Y^N V� ^a: V ep 0.� CrC oB ,�LaCq'G p,L rC40, r H O • O4y. VO O ` VSGby� yb Ob V _ V E ryeb� ^ � A V O.r b G L {•Q L QUC L>.u-1 p,C« q o L� a yA.�.-• u u e E m e q�. ..,': .FE u c asi si u~.a TwbN Zr � v'�40 �� LYbEO bG p..+ cu op NL t b u r N Gay cr yr = r" w u"+! u EE � L AGO O =N tC�2 O Yb V - L` Vp c4 C O Nb V WN E > K«� K^im L .�Eu ON N o tp .J nvL N Kl a y 6.. K 61w Iu66u Yf.«a V • N ,q b-21 W _ T v.0 edi i CV ♦L C V O r v+y ;~ tiuL 1R lit Y L 4 • ��.- dK0 `V � 4T yQVq gti�a � � Op IQ � wL bci wvCz � tuyY CVY > d CN '. f� A L ya'« Aiy eyau c _ V. �. C V N 'T W h4 m^ V.ty v e$a as +� Z» ti Eli c���Ep E2 a QV b C Y «yN Knd �E� G� A"Q'aQrt+ E4Eu^ �94 =«d Cyy y�0 �L.L G yC AwC,Q p 4 'Na+r 6 V V K O L N W r.t4 V L..q 4 Q C'O q w C hV G OQ. Lw.y A « Z .•. N4.. y'v+•y OZ Rz— Y n •Yy. EG. Q CAE 4T i CO J Ca O6�Y•. 4 L Ep, A NLde L+� t}o t [Y LN dLJM1 Y A d 40t Va. jC�COV adipypw »p4 ' U arr LNV RTO. L» 6G « S VNwC. �� F�A.V.N �4 qw �,. 4 D E V• yn � yy 4' aa �R�i P• p � N m, x 1 • C'N rVu4 4 .y.•g4 ACV '�«y Vy_ C4+w .• N4 aXWC.. 1 v •a c.,, roN` L.L u d V tJL .%.0 gdM �9va s SV V ' L4 u ArA C Uy iQ.UQ' r o,00 i S'y a 4 urLi A qY k O O wad V Oro-o E M�.. v V M1 O»•d. ACE qv cNL wrLl '� n�y� NL V.Vj � Voc vQ ».t... ^O`er VC> L.= •" .�q O{. CT C �.L.Y ..ai> XY«R CQ ;� A»L•.� c Cat .-.Q Oc.p Y-aV. K.y„A 9 C 2.t:.Qq Cig d VIZ a� 2 4Y. 3.4p »Lq 4GtL' > • yV mpg»g L.�=YT ]C. 6 y qCO c�^ t 01 Ly^u+..C. p GYa Vi`V • yd. E Vwc. 4y `C . 1QiWV» '. cAq 6v A RN d V Y 0...»N Ob Lw 8 iy V n w�63 .. Cy..q E wy Yn9 VT A6 r+N VNE �++3^ Lit` 70 V A1..Q Qom O �y4Y. }T N+»i A. �.E Vy�u 6V w A N A C N L 4 u R'4 ;L N.L Y LL.w W dCS dN 4L C qC .Ji =y GN L �Op� » q'L y t 9.^ E 4 d A . V O•Q _ V Va Ly p q Q p C � 4»�. G.,� -O C '•gg^ d�C d p .a.N V ` CCigAp 6{4 N �A zt .��=d YCy AT � HOC � NxQ ON?V r,wt AE = N4'O ggMV 3 L�2 cF 4 •...3a V;14 bQ y dV Y A. » T w•". p p3Cp L y� y Y o F.�N»p Y4 4 CV •1 m a. E44 �.�Ap � �� M .._ .5) ly ..A. 4yAti. SAC S �L Ot d� Vr uQ6 O �4 tr 4>4Q. Y»alOC 6+• y ` �" V6 q C r. 4b Ap Q� O.E Ltip«Uw• NN 271^ ..�L 4 �O�gti � LflNN ..d. dy L.Garr +a q6 L N � a C. �u O Po '^ta�uNA � a� a U hh'Au y R CE O Q y J O y a r q Q O G a.Q yO GwQ.= y.N ONO LG CEG y 4 _r +. pO. Y21� 2I Y� N LYgf' ~♦ O� � a ` S N bE� �U�O 1 c� 'aNx tiv Qc as ih o oa;w .�+r. Yb T p p �O C i„ N v` •^ L G F' C S C 'O rna YacG. tl1E C Z a.�L R i= u 't m.i tl Lf. O T� : c.i4 •Ca LIDO `7V' C v w M � w � , O at� B ma yvc r4. y t aw. A �am6 sy"o "xx'w n.�m $ gA w p m c c v.a o u on. 9:;� uY arnII Ali . �NM o IIl A. 8 vw..CY Cp 4'atlC eq I ^EGY fC �pO 4•� 4 AN �a ��AG.. a �'� NY=Oa N' a;Oy a tlq _ Y wQ tl �+ w QGGQ1 G.a. N.. V V y G Q Fy G N w Ab C..N. 'n'-,. VEE Y N Y p Y N .` t+t _ L D•4 Lg L� ^ Q QY9b a+<,LN �Y RQL Nan p.2 r`. aUC pq O�,y •i.V. L a i� a'. yw _ Cam- r C4 ,s YpV QG _ >> oy rt.Q a c' o J'a_G c �� �i a2 _ D••i !TK Oa Q t'Y �t� �u ^o � uA u C L L'Q^ tlY Y. CY of G a a M NEu,2 Ur q O Q Y 4 3 `U N M RN1. 9 Q N u� O • ,•. V �O 1 Y N Yb> �Q �. A a x f: •+ p V. y a L D• Auo w G y •• AIMLI Y I O eL _ • .,.0 u t• q, t O O + q Y q t N . y 2-Z. c d d'=6 La d M 3L: c hN T yhu 52 U L 4 dTE -n d00 'Lm'.Y D: n • n un G �s`nu y EmD 0.0 LK. �Lt. EL EuvEELtWi u L d N u �� Tti Lq..Td= NU C ,wy ONY V c C NOs•u N9 6U {V.r Wu LU 36.. Up 4 w. �plt ri.I m •. � • N F � n Y3U E'nC•: xN �p C 'CL. mn rnau _ in^ F .c. x°r' E a 9Y.p Z! E Ec.•. 2 y C Ca ^V C WJ D ^ W u tuEjO 3co Yn aY� y~j.3 ^ mac.U. LL p'O� L2 1^�r� ^O Oa c 66 r E D c N I. aA ao•L ws r, u mL.z ¢L-:c�'. '! ��„ c c tDI Oi � n a w i c p f� u p 9 u w q y a e r i u L cau F wq > K»q Aak Q C y tiu 'aa O Lp L` y L ca " q EL ao L ZZ iv y m" y ^y .qc yo 5. n a a a s r c` 6c spaV S v u a CI ^ u F L :. o - RESOLUTION NO. A`RESOLUTION OF THE ?ANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MODIFYING CONDITIONAL USE PERtiIT NO 86-02 FOR TWO TEMPORARY CLASSROOM TRAILERS AT COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCH LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 19TH' STREET AND DFRYL STREET IN THE MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, an the27th day of August, 1986, a complete applicat,,pon was filed by .Community Baptist Church for review of the' above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 8th day of October, 1986, .the Rancho Cucamonga Planning, Commission held a`"public heariny to consider the above-describes project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Plar' Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use 4: in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 2. ' That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto,,wil'i not be detrimental to t; public health, safety, ,or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements 'in the vicinity. 3. That. the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development ;ode. - SECTION 2: That Conditional Use rPermit No, 86-02 is approved subject to the following conditions:: 1. The temporary trailers will be permitted until such time , as Phase I is completed or two years, whichever comes first. This condition shall be formalized by an agreement drafted by the applicant to the satin--ction of the City Attorney and executed prior to the installation of the trailers. f2. Provide skirting around base of trailers to screen temporary foundation supports. 3. All L ility equipment-shah be screened, -ram art` Resolution No. �. Modification to CUP 86-02. October 8, 1985 s Page 2 4. Prior to=installation of the trailers, the drive approach and aisle shall be'completed to the satisfaction of-the Foothill Fire District to provide a secondary access to the trailers. 5,� Prior to occupancy, of the. trailers,, all protective apparatus shall be installed and inspections completed as required by the Foothill•Fire District, & landscaping shall be provided along the east and north elevations of:the trailer- to provide visual relief of the = building mass; Landscape plans °shall be reviewed and j approved by the Planning Division prior to installation of . the trailers. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS'8TH DAY OF OCTOBF_R, 1586. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE.CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: P Dennis L. Stout, :Chairman ., ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning,)Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do ?hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and j regularly, introduced,-. passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the ! City of R4ncho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of October, 1986, by the following,'vote-to-wit: AYES; COMMISSIONERS: 1 NOES: COMMISSIONERS: 1, ABSENT.: COMMISSIONERS: r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GUC^Mo = STAFF REPORTo G c � DATE: ccl ' :r 8, 1986 197T . ' TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AN DEVELOPMENT REi►IEW 86-26 - _. a developmenr or 1"51.4 acres n us ria z- ashler -an,, Phase I development consisting of 7 tight manufacturing buildings totaling 86,592 'square feet on ;;,29 acres of land, and Phase iI development consisting of 9' light-manufacturing buildings totaling 131,000 square feet- on 7.5 acres of land, in the General Industrial District Subarea 8, located between Arrow Highway and Jersey Avenue, between Utica Avenue and Vincent Street APN: 209-142-15, 14, 34, 10, 12. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a lonceptual vaster Plan; site p a1 n and elevations for Phase I and II developments, and issuance of a Negative'Deciaraticn. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North Vacant, existing multi-tenant Industrial Park; Industrial_Park District - Subarea 7. South Vacant, industrial buildings; General Industrial - District Subarea 8, Minimum Im,ict Heavy Industrial District Subarea 9. East - Vacant, existing industrial building; General Industrial District - Subarea 8, Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial District-- Subarea 9. West - Vacant, existing industrial buildings; Industrial Park District -, Subarea 6-and 'Haven Overlay District. C. General Plan Designations: Project Site General Industrial North Industrial Park South - General Industrial, Industrial Park East General Industrial, Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial West - Industrial, Park ITEM K,, i75 PLANNING COMMISSIOA, STAFF;,REPORT October 8,` 19a6 DR 86-26 - Aja/Barton Page 2 !!! Il i! D. Site., Characteristics: The „satrfis; vacant and vegetation consistso decayedvineyards."~=The`land slopes from north to south at approximately;,4%. ... I1. ANALYSIS. A. General: The proposed Master Plan is an expansion of the ' exist.n `Rancho Cucamonga Business Park and consists, of seven phases.V Although Phate.I-is.part of the:,proposed Master Plan, it consists of 2,sep4ratl^ iegal .parcels and is noV part of the" related Parcel Map 103:7' for Phases• II through VII. The Pgrcel Map will be forwarded to the Commission for review in the -near future. Further, this project is being reviewed according to 1 the new and revised standards of the--Industrial Specific Plan that has been adopt by the City Council recently. The design co:cept of this proposed Master Plan is similar to the existing(industrial condominium development across from Arrow Highway. Both Red Oak Street and, Utica Avenue will be ` extended from Arrow N:,'y., south to connect with Jersey Blvd. A two tier east-west '611-de-sac street system is proposed in order to minimize the amount of grading as the land slopes from north to south and would evenly distribute traffic to Utica Avenue and Red Oak Street. The proposed architectural style for Phase-I and IY developments consist of painted tilt-up concrete panels with deep.,. reveal that organizes geometrical way. Building, entry statements are provided for each building through the use of courtyards,,concretE,columns, spandrel glass, and plainted plaster soffet behind as''shown in Exhibit "V. B. Design Review ;Committee: The Committee has reviewed the project an as recommended approval of the Master Plan, and Phase I and II development with; the following conditions: 1. The concerttial design for ;Phase VI and VII of the Master Plan should rot be -part,,,of this review. The developer should further t!udy and redesign these two phases,to comply with the: City Access Policy of limiting the number of driveway; along Arrow "High.ray to three. Revised conceptual design should be submitted for additional` Committee .review. u � A/ - PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT October 8, 1986 ,. OR 86.26 - Ajalba -on Page 3 P �r 2. The developer should 4ontinue the existing landscaping theme of -the existing Rancho Cucamonga Business Park, where dense landscaping is utilized to compliment the buildings, 3. The aeveloper.should consider providing benches and other hardscape within courtyards, office entrance areas and plaza'areas. C. Environmental Assessment Staff has'completed Part II of the nvironmen eTM ,s and has determined that the development of this project may expose people or property to Water related E hazards such as flooding. However, a drainage study has"been required to be submitted to the City for review in order to determine the mitigation measures for alleviating the potential problem of flooding on-site to the satisfaction of the Cityr, Engineer. Therefore, Staff has determined that there wily not be significant impact in case because the mitigation( measure as recommended has been added to the Conditions oi" approval. If the�Conanission concurs with the Staff findings, the issuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order. ' III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the General Plan and the IndustHal Specific Plan. The project will not cause significant adverse' environmental impact. In 'addition, the proposed use, building design, site plan for Phase I and II and the: Master Plan together with the recommended Conditions of Approval, are in compliance with the Industrial 'Specific Plan and all other applicable provisions of. the City Standards. Iv. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission issue a egative Declaration and, approve the Master Plan, Phase I- and II development of Development Review 86-26. ResWBtl tte Bra City Planner BB:NF:dak Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Aerial Photo 1 Exhibit "C" - Site Utilization`Map Exhibit "0" - Master Plan _ :.-1' '�� :; .-€• -:'r- wry- . PLANNING COMMISSION -STAFF REPORT October 8, ;08E r OR 86-26 - Aja/8artor Page h. Exhbi "E"-- Detailed Site Plan for Phase I � Exhibi "F"� _ Detailed Site-Plan far Ptia'se II ,` Exhib ,i; "G" -.Conceptual Grading Plan for Phase I Exhjb��t "N" - Conceptual Grading Plan for Phase XI Exhibit "I" - Conceptual Landscape Plan .for Phase I Y Exhibit 40" - Conceptual Landscape'Plan,for Phase II, Exhibit uR - Building Entrance'Statement - emes Exhibit. "L" - Elevations:for;Phase I Exhibit "M" - E;Ievaftion5 for Phase II F Resolution of Apprdval with Standard Conditions � a 'j 'r r}r � ~�Q• Q. .��� 0�r0 t7 S n'W�"�k'9'1U r - � '�qt7 iR •f +•� 'O i k1 a t itcut-ATWN 'tAALS/p�Xt}'ES 6Y==120`RA.W. o oao PadesMon Creaks i daJvwb '/,S� FW S=atbn assesses locr RO.W. 400. Bicycle 1 1=3^or lass R.O.W. fift RAL gpy ,Access Ponta I -- •+yw.- SP+NaI Shsetuaq� I Existing =Park �•Proposed Power Easement ~ $ AOO.:JIW� 760Q Not*:Parcat ones and lot contlpuratlons are shown as approximation only. =T�is she'shown may not be ct"on09 owned nor Is.the loeatlon aka speclnc.The dsplctton of o a e le an Indication ut a projected tuturo need that may be adjosted over time ee jns etty dcvetops. 6" V NORTH CITY OF RANCHO CLCA��IOT GA ITFr�t 7 T TITLE= P� PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT=... scar= ' .�`' -wr_ttsYi� .o+ -+ ;�'.n '� L a:1` f .•t.'� +t';- +:, ��.J �,r r` '.''�. c#•t�aYx'i�M-{ _.{^jity 'r 1�. '' 1�: � p _ 'C+<�'i�. h��rY7+7 v �t y �`;`• � . l �f�,R�...4 a� �}} � �. �R' �•'F R +,1 ""t"„ t� r•� ,� �., y�w � ��`aA tit}� i��r}# ��, �5 � - i �"+�� ut �f ,+. s �t,. `-9 .��a�!.K� w't Y:-- y �f �}y e?�Rr� a ice` '�' � .1t Y����� f.• .�c �1Tf"'. 'z� Y ,•c�l� ia ^:'.�;{��� r!� q f ,y f J 4 �!�a ,;c r :1 --�— �. ems;' i�; !':�1!'_ E 1 i��J �� �� "' Tii r�,I !...f„�� '��., R, ��'r� $ -�. s. _{ ,: .r• -F.r�_'. A—'`{.�'�-' a. * y �y� � t,yi,t i.l` f.a ;r. '•�r.;� 'F� ���' ,� ,j^c2 e ' spa. i Us ' 3 _ 14 ILa �� t Cp �� U z z 055 z n cc )k, x _._1!_ mitts$ — ` p �s=• —_ _ .fl O � ( o Z' 5J] ' U 47 : ; �. t g all z'¢=< . z UcMLU-- z LLJ C—) 0. U,m g Z lI - - -M- -P i=-n MIS . k 7 s e I r � � t---•gam---t" f 1 f f f It f~I i f I ._. mr 1-1 [r TA13ULATIONS -talm i t+j0p avr rtattao �! 0.af tMSt ar lrrt Or RU tart. at tat+ Qa apt taa4 at t.ra _ Oatie's b'•o' •a'cn {.� aM iMt4 rx. tots ' y ,.rntrq.-ac��r-�-ae/f*Ka�w e'°`_� n. .N MIA at qa _ r■t•[Y ' � -x.�`�~ Q. . au W4 n aot ensile O c T.L Qm�+r�e+�'r` hi f $ts �"^"t��•�� M�_w- erera ss'•a'n TOTAL a.sr ftum -.�k: stir �NmT Pr+.!'til[tY INK R► 't'f .F.�, ~'-• SITU. oa.tan - f... [ COVE[ACk .rc t�.t�x.. ' DETAILED SITE PLAN f 1 WDSCAM tea Clut I•yr9• V V NDRTH CITY OF ITEM. RANCHO CUCAMONGA Tii'I,.E= , 7PLANNING DIVLSIM EXHiBiT SCALEI--. _ Al- lt-�A`STHEt'7 _4. 1 iii 3• Ip ..d ,d - �' tea*,♦ r. r jt u ;. iTfli��fTfl-fff�fTfl"i'["x-�fTf'fTT tt IlllIIt I - i ` 5 • I • 1 L_ b s� I i � Y TABULATION 9u.Ur+Gs. SF, _.:PAWwaasGro• PARKMPRO'M i 1 ease N 17 2 TAU 10 13 f UMa oo pp _ •.. LIY PL1K 4 9 . 4 u s .. B,rtta arxw DUALEOSREPLM RANCHO CUCAMONGA '�°° ,7 IT BUSINESS PARK II PHASE 2 S }7An is ,e RMCW CUCAAgNpA,CALFOFNA •y •� B ,Vas ]0 x 4 !• �.. BAWO:•DaTLOPMEi`NT COMPANY YOTAL 131.00�)SF• 303 011 p��nu nAt+�oa¢oe sf MEus�O°wma�ai-G;':a Ae uelna r..W 1 COVERAGE 1N10RTH CITY OF ITZ*vI= � RANCHO CLTCAMONGA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISK N EXHtBrr.--f ,SCALE: • rti..rr rrM. 1� 1. L :�.., y —�_•+•r...r rn.wr..rr r.wrr w�. • - T--�-. � . .� o;-. ,e._... tea....Q..... a � Oti ,� lrrrewr.ao a `y` p.aa...w«wsr r• �., a » •� 4. YiQTN &wit QO _ V NORTH 1 CITY OII T ITEyi: PL. IVNT,IiG DIVISiON EXHIBIT. SCALE: f(y��� J 1 k �4 r..'•-la�',s�t�4'G'��1.V.:,va'i{*sue '' - M Z al. � uc N:.. ............ .l:dS:Y 60ULLDAAJ C" V NOR i CITY OF ;;��.//�� �•+ --aNCHO CLTCAlY1�J�Tl.A PLANNING ]Cv M()j 1 EXHIBIT KKfz , f 111 • i�— ...i .. ,f ff 1� . '✓ 'a..«. i � 9 �J/___is � _ ii.. � �'..j'. � �.�...... .. _ off.' ( a•.�•� ` � '-'t ..: wl•n►w,ti.�W i •w• nM.... ...l: I , I L NORTH CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCTA ITFrYI . TITLES � !A I t L.A.NNIItiG DIVIRaN EXHIBIT. SCALE: Jr i J.. ', Itlilttt- tttIIffI °; I LEGEND E , • I f ;� ACCENT TREES: , $ L tits ttittt tr l 'Q EVERGREEN TBYES -. ..��, 'tZ1RR/G$OIRiDCDYER ttttttttff tt to � � ANCEETE t � r, 5 :1 z f 7I I.[I a�7771-��� 11 � t a r CONCEPTUAL ILLUSTRATIVE LANDSCAPE PLAN RANCHO CUC MON GA G Of r` BUSINESS PA.BK I I IDEV,E-LOPMENT COMPAXV UQ9 UTICA �S=H PHASE. I nASCHQ CUCANIDNGA. CA. 92730 31A � 11RZ.hghA - i I NORTH CITY OF i ITFrVX: RANCHO CiLTCAIVI(J 7GA Tll i;:!s��C P A.NNi,NC DIV C N EXHIBrri—;;ZL SCAM. ,/' WSTREE S. 2 t I N. � 60,10 1111II i 5 LEGEND i ® ACCEWTAEES i . O STREET i F7. OGNCREIE YBT PLAN CONCEPnr 4LUSTRATNE MASTER SlE.PLAN PHASE! RANCHO CUCAMONGA BUSINESS PARK 11 PHASE 2 RVXHO CUCAMONOA.CALPORNA BARTON DEVEIOPMBJT COldPANY av rwcaors[w. NORTH CITY 01{ RANCHO CUTCAMUNGA ITFrVI: _ PLAWING DID OON TITLE: �1 EXHIBIT-. SCALE- .. . K/s V Env� ENTRY i ENTRY S i ENTRY{ ;ENTRY.`3 I ENTRY ISOMETRICS I RANCHO CUCAMONGA: SUSINE?5S PARKI1 PHASE 2 p,RANCNO CUMCNGA.'MFTNSJA BARTON DEVELOPMUIT COMPANY ?9l G NIORTH CITY OF ITRANCHO CUCAMONGA I ibi: / PLAMING DIVISIChN S EXHIBIT: SCALE �/' R', 1 r • ------------- �.�= ..-------, F.F. J. +, EAST ELEVATION a a T.OF PANEL ----—--- ------- ---- WEST ELEVATION A C � IT.OF PANEL , _ -----------•----__•... .............—.------- NORTH ELEVATION -------------------- -------- -----— F. 1 0 T.OF PANEL e•-s• a'-s• SOUTH ELEVATION F.F. i RANCHO CUCA.MONGA ( BUSINESS PARK I I DEVELOPMENT COMPANY PHASE I a409 UTICA Ave. 71iC%0967 09aOA` CA. 91730 i 1 1\VRTH CI7"Y F TTF-LvI: TCHO CUCAMONGA T.IM: PLANNING DIVNION ExHxBIT SCALE` - f.O°PANEL — .F: EAST ELEVATION � t - TT.OF PALNEL 20, � i WEST ELEVATION �. T.OF PANEt 20` o F.F. is NORTH ELEVATION vs•nr•-9• T.OF PANEL r SOUTH ELEVATION ris•W-0* RANCHO CUCAMCINGA m z�UQ o H BUSINESS PARK I I DEVELOPMENT COMPANY PHASE I R402 ANCHO CUCLIAONOA. CA. 91730 7(4-/007-0095 N X)RTH C N' ®F ITFrVI �' 2L PLA NMNG DIMS CXN EXHIBrr: K-/ 20•-9• EAST ELEVATION } va•r,.._o. i TT.OF PANEL i i. F.F.. .. WEST ELEVATION T.OF PANEL ' 20._0.: SOUTH. ELEVATION �( Q Q Q � n T.OF P.A 3'-6• al'o. � 20'-0 4'3,� fl NnRTH ELEVATION RANCHO CUCAMONGA BUSINESS PARK I I DEVELOPMENT COMPANY PHASE I 0409 MICA AVE. P Y RANC%0987 99OBCA; CA.. 91730 7t4NORTH CITY RANCHO T iTEtb1: .� CIAO CLCAMONGA �--- TITLE= PLANNING DM. CXN EXHIBIT TT Lor MCI is WEST"ELEVATION rs' Il F.F. EAST ELEVATION I. TI- ��qr FUEL 5. rl — " Wftli ELEVAT IOr: Y 7 a MF MEL SOUTH ELEVATION i Y RANCHO CJCAMONGA Q � BUSINESS PARK II DEVELOPMENT COMPANY PHASE I 9499 UT1CA AVE. AMCNO CUCASE0'GA" CA. 91790 14!987-0998 V . FORTH CITY or, ITEIND ; Z Prj ,��I\�TTC77��FjTo CUB CA7 MONGA .��: � �o , SCALE-, Jtg�'- LEST ELEVATION ve •i -o T Qi.OF PItNEL. rr r EAST ELEVATION i'r '-o• 0 � t SOUTH ELEVATION c IT n 7 L-------------«__..- _----_--_ - --_-_-_----------_-_-----_-----------_--------____------- NORTH ELEVATION va•-t•-o• s RANCHO CUCAMONGA a 'O . BUSINESS FARK II e E VEi•L O ENS, coatPANY PHASE I t:,,01US CUCAMONGA. CA. q«ao jt TT NORTH ■Ir \ Y O1 T ITEM.' 'RANCHO CUCAMaITGA TITLE PLANNIIN'G r)W SON EXHIBIT= SCALE: t ti r,OF PANEL 9EST ELEVATION T.OF PANEL 71 18. EAST ELEVATION " 64 SOUTH ELEVATION r -._•_ hfJ (Tip ---------------- ---------— ----- ---- -- ----------- --' NORT;i LEVATION RANCHO CUCAMONGA RMAlCTIQNI BUSINESS PARK II DEVELOPUENT coa[PANY PHASE I 7e�lo4 9/u.rtc CA Qt790 987-01199 NORTH CITY OF T r RANCHO -,�C`CAI` 0.NL -- PLANNTII\'G DNISIC1Lt FxHmrr-A= SCA LE.. ./ Y 1 'si-c' .' L--------------------- -_ WEST ELEVAtEON t8-0. J EAST ELEVATION Q iia•4i•-a• - _ Q SOUTH S Q I 1 NORTH EIEVATi01, RANCHO CUCAMONGAr BUSINESS PARK T I DL E p PHASE r 84G9 vcn . ItANC$IO CQCASIM'GA. CA. 01730 714 007-000@ ' 1\rURT!-� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLAINNING IBRMI,7N EYHIt3IT SCALE. !9��y Mrce.cnnpawy NORTH jr—�wu+►ssey .�N. I Ear ^ WEST ELFVAIION3'"U'LOINGS 1&7 RANCHO CUCAMONCA BUSINESS PARK 11 PHASE 2 RANCHO CL)CANIONU CALM NA BARTON DEVELOPMENT COMRiANY ^^ ' esw r- ue�w.+ar�ae i Nlopini CITY OF ITELVI- TGA PLANNING DNL`(IN EXHIBIT. Il,a R _ NORTH urMcoemMeunw�---y - -raw n WEST ELEVATIONS 8 )IN5S 2&8 - I RANCHO CUCA�r1�JNGk _ BUSINESS PARK lI PHASE 2 auacNna7cu�aNc�a.cu�cFcu o , EARTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY r am nnu urx w exa a-zz-ea.uwwvu�awva/ INURTH CITY OF . HO ITEM-- T/ Q PLAMING DIVIS 0 ,14 EXHIBISte- lo' ' - NORTH 3, 1 EAST 5 {I ��me.raam.n 'r•re�.ewir�sas I oc..�rwn,,.remmo+r +Mmewoner..a 1 t IIII UP. IT it ,. •.. scurli i ,I f wesT' E1..='VAMONS SULT)ING 4 RANCHO CUCAMONv,n BUSINESS PARK 0 f RASE c � - ruw'O CUCAMON"CA1FaNEA, BARTON DEVB.OPME^ff 1:0N PANY OS10� 1�}3!Gv2VPYrA..:O� 1� .. V it r%loRTH '1 CITY OF RANCHOA = ITEr'V: -�tv —also NoRTH a EAST.�1. • � w souni l - WEST RAW O CUCAMONGA BUSINESS;ARKIiPHAASE2 BARTON DEVELOPMENT CCMPANY LTA muw u°tu av�,mownoso$cri-Y OF, RANCHO CLEAMONGiL PLANNENG DF.VNQ'q FJCHIBiT- SGkLE ----------------- x t EAS IT ..nmw.oe.!xuw m"°"ru�nrAw�mm�iw�'PO"t )'MT ELEVATIONS BUILDING 5 RANCHO CUCMIONGA BUSINESS PARK 11 PHASE 2 RANCHO CLCAM MA..CMLEOFtMA go BARTON DEVELOPMENT COMPAT.1 L_ i ���� wn mores de al �10 <i NTORTH CITY OF T T rr��r: ; RANCHO CLCAMONGA T�rz E; � �T� PLNNL"�G DNLSIQN ExHtsrr-. SC�t - _�%-' �rroi ` C�S[BEHf�A1A • . �y- • EViGNRECiS r �rti._ oocw tea.. csvrt� xane�u.�� i S y i7 _. NORTH. ,. ,EAST 1 SOUTH'. I WEST ELEVATIONS BUILDINGSRANCHO CUCAMONGA - I BUSINESS PARK(IPHASE RANCHO CUCVA U CALEOF A BARTON DeJaOPMBMi'COMP1'JJY12 . a;u rxz•ee :cEw�waxanu ' i V , .ORTH CITY OF 7 IT�YI ,11� RANCHO CUCAIV OT GAAWIL PLANNING DI VEON EXHIBIrTr; k- © RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLD.-MN OF THE AANCHU`.Clt4A,MONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEV'1OPMENT REVMi NO. 86-26 FOR A SL4 ACRE MASTER PLAN. AND JHASE _ AND II DEVELOPMENT CONSISTIRR OF 16 LIGHT It A UFACTURING'BUILViNGS TOTALIN4 217,592 $�UARE FEET LOCATED BETWEEN ARROW1.HIGHWAY ANd� JERSEY Ai? ,VJE, BETWEEN UTICA AVENUE AN' VINCENT STREEi' IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT - WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of September, 1986, a complete application was filed by Arrow Rancho Cucamonga Ltd. for review of :lie above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 8th day of October, 1986, the Rancho Cv.ar�onga Planning Commission held a meeting,.:to cons-der the aboveµdescrit�ed project. NOW, THEREFORE,,the Ranncc Cuomonga Planning Commissirn resolved as n� follows: SECTION 1 That tie following can be,met' 1. That the' pr6�Osad p .iaect is consistent with the oNectives of the General Plar, and Industrial Specific Plan; and k2. That the proposed Fuse is in fccord with the objective of the Industrial Sp ecifia Wfaa and the purposes' of the ;district in which the site is located; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan and Development Code; ar:: 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditoons applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to tp6 public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the - vicinity. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment a`n'd-tTiat a Negative Declarawion is issued on October 8, SECTION 3: That Dovelopnen' Review No, 'DR 86-26 is approved subject to the fo ow.ng conditions and attached Standard Conditlonss WE ' „PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION October 8,, 1986 OR 86-26 - Aja/Barton ` r .. Page 2 l Planning division Y{ 1 The Master Plan is approved in concept only and future } development for each phase/par� I . shall be subject to ,... Development/Design Review process for Planning Commission approval. Development/Design review is approved herein for. Phases I and II. Modifications. to the Master Plan shall be subject to Planning Commission approval. 2. The conceptual design including the number and location of driveways along Arrow Route for Phases VI and VII is not approved. Revised"conceptualf design shall be submitted for Design Review Committee review and approval prior to ` submitting for Develooment; Review process. 3. The developer' shall., continue the existing landscaping theme of the existing Rancho Cucamonga Business Park, 4. The developer shall provide seating bench;.,' and other , hardscapc within courtyards, office entrance areas and ' plaza areas. Engineering Division 1. OVERHEAD UTILITIES: a. ARROW, ROUTE = The existing overhead utiliti'os 'telecommunications and electrical) on t%:e-_project side of Arrow Route shall be' undergroundod from the first pole on the west ;ide of Utica Ave. to the: first pole east. of the p1ro.ject boundary, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy,'whichever occurs first. Reimbursement ofone-half the adopted cost of undergrounding. from future development zs, it occurs on the opposite side of the Is feasible from the presently undeveloped properties'. b. JERSEY BLVD. - An in-lieu fee as contribution t• the future undergrourding of the existing overhead utilitiEs (telecommunications and electrical) on the opposite side of Jersey Blvd. sha'1l be paid to. the City prior to tha issuance of,building permits. The fee shall be one-half the adopted unit amount times the .ength of the project frontage (420 - feet). LL ,, a PLANKING COMMISSION RESOLUTIOd October 8, 1986 OR 86-26 - AjalBarton Page 3 2. A drainage study shall be provided by the developer's Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of any permits (foundation, grading, building, etc. for any project. The study shall specifically addr�-las: a: The impacts of drainage to the intersectia« of Red Oak Street and Jersey Blvd. including potential flows crossing Jersey Blvd; b. An fpalysis of flews in Jersey Blvd. including street cap'city and t'e need for possible storm drains; and c. A plan identifying when needed drainage facilities are rewired in terms of project phase construction. All necessary drainage facilities< shall be constructed. with the improvements for the pr ject. 3. Red Oak Street shall be constructed for its entire length from Arrow Route to Jersey Blvd. upon construction of Phase It. 4. Sidewalk is required on one side of Red Oak Street between aersey Bivd. and Arrow Route; however, meandering sidewalk on both sides is acceptable, ,. The driveways'along Red Oak Strel?t shall be constructed as f fo1laws; a. A 30-foot wide drive approM h at the property line. b. A 25-foot throat depth from tl;e public street curb to t!,e first parking stall 6. Access shall be provided to Phase IV of the Master Flan prior to issuance of any building permits for Phase II. Access is currently prohibited to Vincent Avenue by a 10 foot wide strip of land under private ownership. 7. TLe location and d3sign of the driveways onto Arrow Roane are not approved as shown on this Master Plan. 8, The &veloper shall pay all reimbursement fees per City Council Resolution No. 85-328 executed by Daon Corporation for construction of 'improvements on Arrow Route prior` to issuance of building permit,. for Phases VI and VII of the Piaster Plan. Ix PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION y October 8, 1986" DR 86-26 - A3a/Bartgn 7 Page 4 APPROVED AND,ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 19fi6. ' PLANNING COMMISSION r,F THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA w y� { Dennis Le Stout, C irman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Dep4ty Secretary I, 3rad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular iaeeting.;bf the Planning Commission"held on the 8th day of Octob;�r, 1986,,044-,\the foll•a"ing vote-to-wit: AYES: C014MISSION17RS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS:. rz ABSENT COMMISSION9S: i L.yN Yut PyY ATUO C� aw�"4 RtPu .V.�C d.F.r p EE C YP=�P aLP' L O. O.Ud6 �` Oa.E 44.OQG PEE =32 G Q... UaiiNU Ogt3. �J� �dJ aL�gY—U Zp yV6yN +� 4 p.�3 Np VO y0 Y� t.0 d6p Nti Y •Z. Pa2��U�.�U.Ay VuO „a„ ^'4.'q Hr gL�r �:Q♦a.y� Q. \ Lo c�dRy�, o«. avJu o4� as A.45 VOp� GPU YC? .Q GY.4C NVd n �OCa" G d n R,D l� dyYL4&Eg—. V p Gp i 4V� GE b a00 �.YyL C" wP- �L V C— E.. O� 64•Y6 dg a v Y Y a C O H N G Y VOA Epdp Y4.+ip oN dFv�v...d t a—uAnva tY.i zL.— 1-.. op sPu:. Cw.�II •Fn •g'`o p'a'o rnc:+:nta Affik u 'fit\ m O L. M g P E u 6.C..LN �.a � W a an Nrd _,� gn�Yv ti 6=1ti � w N-'P .Cif L au. .a. L. d=VlTYf1FY.pL 1 � apt � 4P �Nv�Au.Y Yy .J F^ 9 d P�OY Nr� a. 't• t� N •�,4, u�.� 4. �ti •� 1. Y F' NhP. N - `,p—Y .lie E �y� tJ G E p 6C P[I YbNG~y V V. 4 4p F � [dy q ,C Ply Eua>y P N•• N 40Y O K a 1�11 6�.F qNF�..Nr G=- T m=?' O +w d^�AruCv �� � O Eaae Sm"A c^"gip a s^ d c^ai ii e.. c Qgu w aY` <VyC LYy0L ~qT.O. _..•1 o 6e ` v En' onN „� t ay Np S a. L6 V y ti.. R N.r A O p w O�U Y Q. Y L ��, V Y •6 Y V=4� Y.L, A Ne.d. a. Ewa O A9 aaim W Oy- ENE�tiktV w� 3 �O L O dV 11�. G M ^eY.y �6v.. f O{�Y O��O 9 s p+.. YM� < ^SAO roN Wt V^O 6L yy 3...d OOc >,KP•":#�Y� LF.6 L �.��a �Q�.. dC O= •r1 ^9 4 L 9 d L Q N 2O� Oq.O'.Yf+O Yiw w L Y. Y N Md CLA ft^L _ Cam. •� ..- CN b�VNw YN V^ p..4 L.�,H{IO V'\r_� "'Z aRya#i "4u V �� w • CVi�. t _ a O� .Ay 0 `L36 i.,Y C 1 2 : w�: fN ovy n• q�.=.• • C ra�.NaNS AYun y.Y W#q ls. Nfm,os p`. e� �^E'y,.V,Y Yf. �-'� Ep l•N Va p4 W2 �NC. tay0 Nye^ p. ^.. 0. yy. ,Yp wAE gp•pA ^nq. .•j Y o o aLS 4_•' pL u.P < P^- Y G1� AMfD aNChap m c yNfw W 6ry C N VY. F ^ V< h L N N r y ! O L H N M P O C LL~O C V < .q a Q�_ d,C N Y M^ u a ng wy.GEEU a �CCe E as L N a im V 9II'• a YaG YY as L P&y T.V`a0046 C wgE0.PWO.LO YnO TG ��NNLy=N VU a 42 ewe4LAYQ N0.� G e.MLO. K VY+. N • SA<V y4 O.ZC^-QCw� . L ?ai2n0.6rVg yf.ML^y�v:c$9Lt aO�er�WaO,KL Z9Vra C-Y ' yIZET M- GGECy '�< w YO.# V .^ ^ • H �Y. it yapN AV Un^ CCi� =4 d� wg ally qYu� i,.L.Aab wNGNV wN. L 9af GO.V> L'O1a. ~ Nr �_ Y c N.pC ut NY OMp G H4`'✓. 6. 4 Y '; ' Y S.TON Y OIO� SL S:.yu0.. y<v '. hALO AGGwq< P4 � '�L Oyi A frrl L .Cn 0 i+C O pf ML.,r 3.#V N N R • O 4 +�uuLLiv� �Y�mp p oY4^1 o�' vY:w yR a -V.. W� �.mu. 'c V . EXwa 0.� 12 r>-W L. +'YV }j: QC< C:Ow m V.Ny O.OV K fY�ny G c W A Pp ya '... nG.�Y Ear _ewa u cq #y�l� v 9c v.Y �y�ndw SQL pf = NA d.NM >ryP Loli o. '^< "L'�' Yo a...mw aaY. -^�ad �:•rdo a -�E o5� o c�aa Y0.nO 4C w n ~ w.pO .0 AQ<'=Yil O't np CA .�d ^M.d. ^ O $e aLL NOS P V 4F1d �_ V� '.'Fi NUc S.S�V Ly+O�NC uOv yf v m N L N •L+i 3 4� E:ut� u x� C o r <.f.. � • C.< '�O.N <. H r# q O b r C O"O . C G p C C R.=Q Y i EE Z L F r�U r�C O i.O c C Y V Y .q L P V l �e.p L C 4= .w. p 7 I Y:.•Y. 46C a `N O`Q W6 w0 40. L Yx abVO VpO Lie m l M O L Y9C # a y ¢ V U KYn.ca W6 1-r Mp +C.-fYif.Op. iiVft C4 .OS.aLiL OY nv Taw -I-;-Nd.N <p.+l V.. l a.G a L P=il o ' L �1 Y p y '•Oil _ C G a 0 Y G. O Yu' ,. 1 P� O N L' ♦ y y �'YO„} �l LO�1 A Oda I N U n O y �i CC �.A. O O V 46 u U O u Y ' a 0 _ L G wy S ^ yN� q A c .�.. P` R AYN. j:y 6 O� Z L :._. u w 0 N'Y Y •y y 9 V N `O d.Oi 1 .^ b.O CON Y t' � .". . 1 u P �O T 00 Mudd�. CL O .K U1'a 4 =�N U a 4•Gw W O 0 6 g C N a.u La 1 T V > UY'd aY ` CCL PLO `a W:Y. OPLc a'a O.O. w GZ 'O�.uL c Ncr aw uo y ryu oG.« t s• ... 1.1 1r q C L G Y Y y YI nln M q a V i1 G o a L 9 v w Y m c 1'p tl o Y O 1. yy`I- A U i y P_w.0•Yy O^xl q YG ' Y. U i� f = LN LF ^� n• O^ r. p^19 �O> C P _ L z u Y Y Y Y Y^ y r 6 V ♦ � Htl as ^ .�-oanuc OAS A4 :� C i C•G„ GUY 00 L'i� M �c7 am ®� S= N NAN KN.w- K.n 3N0 H-I�CA RCN Y✓��PY �'NO0 twr.04 Ku 4.0 qp M oou au.'ce. e� y. r. tiv.Y.oc as a .-i c µu P 1�,,, =f ¢ E Q M n = ZZ. .cam c n i n 6 Q.al '6P $ nb Y oG.p+ i q. a y N Lmse -Z PP. N.. L>♦n,n. a'' % Y L7 13 oo 'a� a ua NN dr ncc ngLu 8 v �EE -L-7i4 w' ..Ij > y NoeY G y `_NA EY u E.. c 5VY uNYU .U.y u "2-0 qa Tpol e4ow. i' a%oGa U p ya Z9YGG^EE 19e` GT.O.O z'cP N� W. Z. �O Y V NP q�0 .4j P C 60 Z.— L NaLY7.2 OIL N rt NV pC Yu O q Y G C C G 4 U y UG pA Y pl. .+�e 'a nc4r� �� N �z >au Y �oN � • y^^Ly. Y r[a�i NO 47w.m }Y� 69N l�6 KI.l KO r ON�A 6J0 Ka�A W66�Vf aY+wY. �l C � w Iy ' wI � o •�I � � _l I •.Z VUN 6'�:. vNa G y^6 : ��' ya.2 GG JcyO Y L6r�G. w.V. 4i L� ^ ^� Cy 6vtW C 00 y�,y Y w GN Z CV O� YY yC. U V >-* v.... 0 :-cw �' 3+'�'"v :Y.•e. a�3- x.. t NO 4�. • C L L g y C G- � _ Q$� _ _ O 0 ~ ~ �y0 pC^ O" �L� S. r d ZUE CQ4^� C TC. Pq. V LL yy C Gq KL Mx� �.VI.E C q.� � SV•=i.Y [M a.`u+Y �qC "CO uY V O. CG V. EG+ C� L�Y �q TQ. � pGV ^ M4 s Y Y U y O pL C y C q p 4� l41 C O,••:i a y q co Na^ n�'L'i.o. c�"a qi.�i:� c► iiy Y.ie�y c" 4d CCJdv M_4��4'. H �C M.a VV e y4 .at y .a., wY.N EwYeNt p'CC4 V u uss: ^cL °1 coa u c G4.�p Ou C E d i^M J 4a U.0- itpi: Y.V. '.eq od0 Gm 6 M f:4n.� n i Y_ L n O, L LO�V." u`4Y. TUY Fd Y L[ pq HK 3 ILN? .�. y HfJ iYL `a GGM.N C. N IUif .I ' T p' .. q O CC • u q L'w. L iq • �mu u�{ ^FpNT Mw c•�0 G U u .3. q "L u 4 Tp� Cy p L LY 4�o L 60b > d l Ow'Oi� Lam.. ��sa ". . YO i T �.Ld pNy ae 1!N �.• .. q V^ 111 Y� CY g Cn S.€ � '^w �. uL OOu a > � tL a•y C 0.4T e' `O r AO.4" . Oy a0'pp■ 4Up .�.. ^ _ '•C Q' v... o « ac y'fY �ECI O L � c ONE p0 � .�A• YANQ I Y a Q U E ^ V N V q T q C T Y Y Q P�^ C L v"'y C 6 Y\ 1.. •�Y L N..Y. C.Y-'r ..4 GAG 6oC q OOa �01 OL C5L a Y ti �^ 5 8 L m� RIB. uo-- .-N°iY d•� c L L.."a eC e-n.r q'c o^� nN ti kyi elf.d Ll N N .• L'f•- J. iO.Q G W h'. C LIL. f•a$s O Y.•U 14 W a s. � ec caoN - yy v Leo. d VVfyEyE 01 N.bLm`� L> O N Q ^ - ^Nr a 019�¢ yGJ Y y- L3C U}.EGA L.. L cd. p L N b • GL�4 = OG C LI 1 �yM Cg 41 U yQ NNL LL pIL `y^ Y ..L OV✓: G� •f7 6w. �.o� - g N d c am„ .o n. O=N ONB�L� G�4 S I N ^ Cyr 9 g$ o r p` = b Y a ✓ 4L0^pAV y 4 C _ y pY,,C 44 V.• -H-Z l.YN.. V O O' u I �1 4L+G• yL q'.4G �aQ u� EnW g � y yp p � w 1 YOAY`� GFO 6N Ir Nr E — - V 0 U G N G Y CI U �N Ny 61 U L u !.�..D4 ..CL aplC 6v N .ems p a^.. 4 T p b 0� Y .� �f• 0 Y L u p r IS u. �`ouuo w4 a �=c Ya �a m _z 4co.? Yr C8ps �Ej pp o$ �+`Le O Y 9 N tlGeW G4 U9 �N • C�6:L.G 6A 9d O• _N I,�Y LU CCU CO C dq! p0 C y. r r 4 •n N Y nl as TY Lts Yb a A.. =PG q. d - �� 9j VY'. y^p CJC QCC Gy^.V. 9y ^ p4 GCTw, q6 Y� N w N ^ GG.r �a Ea 9 qj± V4� p4, G dYOn 9y�d ¢tea IL y� y N • G N N L2 J o n .'L e L q N. L � CZ� ^ ` -zy N N .y6 OYgY QgYy •.� c w CN. p. � 9 L � ^� 4 u g 3 6'�. fi A N p y 0 r.L C p..•6 C 6 -58 L! „u L i�A O YN EQa Y�a U O GY �.Z �C d o C1G01. T¢ LE 4tl 4 O>,. gpya� Y 01 y C B O m •.s l Y )<^ .�» q G � u Y J�N O.y L^O Y d g a=N - C rC V C g Y A N.A C p+• • G.� u Y E.._�r N 4pp Y O T O vOi ay u O Cv UC OYL NN M pl^u M1L VI uC,A4 6q Nq O6N.E�t o o Y L iO H LI u1.i �G. aLJ�n.I GLcO COI u. 1�0 ¢ A p y. n. Ali LO q _ V �YNOl V p•q u. q ' I .�"' yS us U. C `E� YN M � O NPJC Od 6�.0 Y � O •CN O Y9 !� wp..m Cq C tP VY Y{� E qy at �•. M.r qy O N O M F+ tl s, t �c>Y a �� ■Y a aN LN V� L6M O.� tON P OJ 6..Y l J « y a A. p0 Oq L GL r»Y O O.f' py� Y aD �P Cy C VyD. Yw4 .YiY We p _4 p O.�OG. N� •_� £.• A•y:N.O LU tl^ = U- �� ^ Ldd CYO V U O JM. NW � Nw.YO y 6 rL i dL pYL. L Y� BU 6•n :N . 14 qQy r AOJ ^� _ h� p o•U.Y q CaC� IS D y 1ppi V V V up9 � Q y T � A PO O pp q,C(� C Opp!' O." = rf^ ` Dom• A V Y. O^ M Ll� LO Y Ly V GL Y COL ON .O � .. OJ • ONE AS y'OCCT U cq a M� N6 �qV '~ C ^Nxx� >yyy~ faf�iJO GG^6 NT C uy C...�d =O y 6L� Y■8. 6UJ O^q y qY �9 Vt N.=6 ggTRff 4ee � D p L YtJy J �y i» 6 C9 Wes. b T6 Lbw Epp P` 'UGC d 6MQH M tN. k 9 a < L b W Opp =N �c 'OEp upa �f ^ • »�L� 1 NrU y✓ M b% ap.. Ui aGd.. q.e. OppAN pN.y qC1 �VL NM Kp. p�+J 00'G 1� OO bAL CC YU� C r,.� N MYY � U 2r�� OyMO � �• Yd P�C� NLC ` .tI � N u•L uv 1�—cab 0 z c� 0 n pp qa� rq 92- fXYt Cum YyY. YN LUy9 Y UV^ S C Y C N ^I U.N L p > Y E G 6 M O t N N S L Y Y O 4 = tl UU q Qu.N 9 O�q W Y •Lp OY GC . p a. w �.L..L EO N V g E.2 N U O e i6 gd CtJ Y dy O 4 y, Or l bLL ns ap . C.L -6� ' .. C }VE Nc. Y u C ` YdY MX x.Y O^> C6 C q q 0 Y oh a o '"L.:y u ud.E c. ov. •, 13V •, ep a yL_ Gy�LL) C >.YY �W 69 F^N LYC YO 9» I. co'v Y i.. oai a. oe z�..y ct NY .moo $ a_q N N rn u L u poi a .+o 0 I. N S »g T 6 0 G p d^ �n LCAN .V O� ^ i O _ O O Klq Ya+ T �.� Y ..-• q.0 LY �1..T ,O+W� yY R� . '' ^q p.L YP S � Y 4 w DJ V Y NON LLLL L m 5a u-w' e V C q L O ^ y Y Y y O O Y Y .. oo{.Op 0 F.tY 2 C:4. L CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA .., STAFF REPORT DATE: Octoberr,3, 1986 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Debra Meier, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86-20 `(-M- 11! a developmenE of 3 ware o}—use tei ut on ui ings totaling 237,519 square feet on 11X7 acres of land in the Generai Industrial District (Subarea 13) located at the northwest corner of 6th Street and Rochester Avenue -,APN: 229-261-38, 39. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPT.ON: A. Acti6n Requested: Approval of site plan and elevations; and Ask Issu 775 o egative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: or - neyar , Industria poci ;'r Plan (Subarea 13) South - Vineyard, In isetria1 Specif a Plan (Subarea 13) cast - Vineyard, Industrial' Specif c Plan (Subarea 13') West - Warehouse distribution factfity, Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 10) C. General Plan Designations: Project e - enera n ustrial North General Industrial South General Industrial East General Industrial Vilest General Indus; xal, Rail Served D. Site Characteristics: The site, as well as properties to the no�� South an —as ande—ast, remain as vineyards. To the west is a rail served industrial facility. The land` slopes gradually` from the no-th to south at a rate of about 2%. The site is approximately 6 feet above curb grade along Buffalo Avenue. Sixth Street has been improved to ''A timate width with curb, gutter and median island. Rochester Avenue has curb and gutter at ultimate width for a short distance north of '6th Street. Buffaa.; ,Avenue was fully improved and landscaped along with ' BeveldPf''ent to the west, and in fact, that developer owns the strip of landscaped area on the east side of Buffalo Avenue. ITEM L PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Development:Review 86-20 - Himes -Peters October 8, 1986 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The project consists of 3 warehouse distribution k u7 ings. Plaza areas have been provided throughout the site with at least two plazas expanded to include amenities for s employee lunch `use. Loading areas are provided in the interior of the site to minimize views of loading areas from periweter streets. B. Design Review Committee: The Committee has reviewed the E project an ounce tTat— the overall site plan, style of architecture, plaza areas, and location of loading zones complies with the Industrial Specific-•r`lan. The Committee has recommended approval of the project with the ic,clusion of the following conditions: 1. The texturized pavement within plaza areas in front of office entrances should be of interlocking brick or the pavers. ti. 2. Pedestrian a,aenitie5-'such as raised seating benches, planters, and vaer appropriate street furniture, should be provided within individual plaza areas. At least two of the plazas should b 3F.I0 to 400 square feet in size, with appropriate amens,, s suitable for i employee lunch use. j 3. Plazas could' be screened by use of iow profile walls and shrubs. 4. At the southwest corner of Building A, expand the use of spandrel glass around the building corner to provide a degree of special treatment to the west elevation (Buffalo Avenue frontage). ' a. Break continuous banding at west and east elevations of Buildings A and B similar to west elevation of Building C. 6. on the west elevation of Building C, extend band pattern approximately 40 feet in the northerly direction. 7. -Special landscape 'features including undulating mounding, alluvial rockscape, specimen size trees, meandering sidewalk, and intensified landscaping should be provided along 6th Street and Rochester Avenue as they are both Special Boulevards. I j PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Development Review 86--20 Himes-Peters " �. October 8, 1986 Page 3 K r C. Technical Review Committee The Committee recommends the . . following conditions:, {§ 1. Provide a detailed lighting plait of 'parking lot, building entry, and loading areMs. 2. .Design of meandering sidewalks could be consistent with City Standard Nr 304. 3. Expand width of landscape islands located near' project entries, 4. Provide backup space at end c' 'parking aisle near „* northeast property corner: 5. A lot line adjustment to combine or relocate existing parcel lines shall be accomplished prior .a issuance of building permits. D. Environmental Assessment; Upon review of Part I of the Initial study, and completion of Part II of the Environmental Checklist, staff has found no significant impacts related to the development of the proposed warehouse distribution buildings. III. FACTS FOR FINDINC3; This project is consistent with the Industrial peci is an r!a"n- the General Plan. The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant environmental i4Vacts. In addition, the proposed site plan and building design, together,.! with the recommended Conditions of Approval, are in compliance with the Industrial Area Specific Plan and City Standards. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Development Review 86-20 through adoption of the attached Resolution and Conditions of Approval and issuance of a Negative Declaration. Res pe full su fitted, rad Buller i City Planner• BB•DM:ns i i L--3 PLANNING COMMISSION STUF REPORT 1� , Development Review 86-20 - Himes Peters October 8, 1986 Page AOL Attachments Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" ,, Conceptual Grading Plan ``Exhibit "O" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "E" - Building Elevations Resolution of Approval With Conditions r , K F f aay f! ri H16NTN BTPHBT n.� .. r,• �+t i• t� IM r G: I r• -tUtTTOTI CHUVa: _ p r {y .� unia•�i'� NXTN 6TM. - ism rn . r„rr ' pu..• u [/„\y S1T14 UTtt12ATION MAP ! 7 V NORTH CITY OF ITEM I RANCHO CLCAMONGA TITLE: LOK,471227A,I A III R PLANNING DIVISIGN SCALE � LJ L ii4 R 4 � . =FL- 13 i -SATE 8YMMAR i lwrf.l4arsi .. !c r /,lar cart; ✓' V NORTH Adft CITY Or ITEN-1: RAINCHO C,7CANMONGA TrrLE PLr1NNING DIVISION EXIifBIT: SCALE. __ S �• �� e_ ems.. a 1� -- .f "(W.,Fur mqwuuc crp) � t^P.•IICC'..4Te �� RP.stC9�J4Q: �F tj -- f - e ROCK O TYpICAI r � CITY Or, ITEM: -ttAINCHO C UCAIVI01'GA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: b 17 — sssrr+' -- _y - ------ �j .'�wwR.°tG'�a�Px�txlsiq .,..•--�. E ���/�^^ //. ,�OPi'i f�� — 61 t ''1Y —'d' K�tAcx�ne�6Wt.uwlat � r`P.•IICC'..4Te �� RP.stC9�J4Q: I - 6uFFClo�vi;wL ROCNBDTtd AJ6N116 TYPICAL 6yR wr S[eTIGuo NORTH CITY Or ITEM' SGc�Z A'NCHO C"UC'A'IVIOIN TITLE: 42541P/A/0 f 1-4A„I PLANNING DIVISUN G I3II3tT: SCALE: 11-- 7 y` _•�'•BLO'L PERY.ETERTREE UtM FIXTURE TYP. 1. (r TN4n9a COmartm I Y� SHRUG/ORIXMDCOVER AREA.TYP. )6� lSil HERMED TURF AREA.TYP. q / _ STREET TREE 1-15 OAU20 L,F, !. .,.. p l4w tW an.w EueakyDlus leueosYMn ACCENT ENTRY PAVUIO t y- ' ACCENT TREE •1 Uv 4pvelro?mla Ndka FUE ACCESS LA STREET CTURF CLOCK) \ STREET TREE 1-15 OW20.LF. ' ANue MomhllaUa .. �_ENTRYIACCENTTMM Postanw aeirUaW PREURMILq-IY PLANT PALETTE Alque.rhomWtdlia Eue�lY"tus 11—lylan Pim, alopen IndID� Punta..AO nela Platanua aCerilolla TrlalANacenterta. AGNenthua a1r.. Al Lrba�:Cord� RapNoR.PNO ovum t i ':ariewta' teola Indl&4l, Trapaelaapsrtmtm lyvl oidea Hedara hall'Xand'�r '//^^\\' :LunlC. I Peydle. ✓ V -eI1F seu Hyarpeaed FORTH CITY Or ITBIT eK;H 15&'W' IRAINCHO CUOUVIONGA TITLE:_4,IA/1% t='e � 1V PLAi\NING DIVISION EXHIBIT; _SCALE y, •2 NORTH BLBNATtON MAST BLBVATION. .rr. BOU 7N BLBVA"ON - Win 7LEVATIONNORTH CITY OF ITENI: RANCHQ CUCADVIONGA TITLE:G1-�51Y,gM7.415 PLANNING DIVISION FXIiI BIT- 0-SCALE. N p �t i ty ' T i 0 mmilm ■ a■u ■ c'k�,,� '��`�11�� ������ ��■a�awas a t lhp,s x} t yR' 3 ' �r 4, r Y �w 1 t .. . C�atiJTtt't6 it0'wYtrnS IML I inns a on t9�tair'tuvAtr,a+u- NORTH CITY OF ITE.I- RA'N('HO CLC .�%Lo�T�if� TITLE: PLANNING DlViSlGN EXHIBIT: 5Cr�LG i ' RESOLUTION NO. k A RESOLUTIO'N OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION = APPROVING bEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 86-20 LOCATED AT 1iE NORTHWEST GORNER'=OF 6TH STREET AND_ROCHESTER AVENUE IN, THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of July, 1986, a complEGe application war? filed by Fimes Peters Architects and Associates for revieti of the abov,� described project; and ti WHEREAS, on the 8th day of October, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga ! Planning Commission;,field R\1-ineeting to consider the above-described project. ia follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resclvede&-_ SECTION is Th%t the i`ollowing c'sn be met: 1 That the proposed project is _consisten*. with .the nbjectives of the General Plan; 'and 2. T-at the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Industrial Specific Plan and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Industr,'31 Specific Plan; and' 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improaements in trq vicinity. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on October 8,, 1986. SECTION' 3: That Development Review No. 86-20 is approved subject to the foii conditions and attached Standard Conditions: Planning Division 1. The textured pavement within plaza areas shall be of interlocking brick or tile pavers Provide material sample-for City Planner approval prior to issuance of building permits. AOL L.-12 •. rf f t �, 1lesolution No. CR 86-20 - Himes Peters October 8, 3986 Page 2 ANIL 2, Pedestrian amenities such as raised seating, benches, planters and other, appropriate street furniture shall be provided within, r plaza areas. �.'At least two of the plazas shall be 300-400 square F " feet in size with appropriate amenities suitable for`employeee lunch Use. - € 3. Plazas shall be screened by use of berming, low profile walls or shrubs. n 4. At southwest corner of Building A e = ua of around building corner to provide a egreeof special dtreatment to the r,5t e1evatis-1 (Buffalo Avenue frontage). �. 5. Break continuous banding at west and east., elevations of Buildings A and B similar to west elevation of Building C. 6. On the west elevation of Building C, extend band pa-tern about 40 feet in 'he northerly direction. 7. Provide back-up space at end of parking aisle near northeast property corner. 8. 'Expand width of landscape islands.'located near -project entries. h r Engine�_rin9 Division =1 1 An. easement for shared ac',ess on 6th Street for the benefit of the �,grty located to the sd�,h of the pf' site shall be provided jn easement from the City shall be obtained for the triangular tF the City property contained within the driveway prior to b1a , permit issuance. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF OCTOBER9 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - 1 BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary i i` 1 e >ti Re olutio tea, t .t Reslut7 r - tomes Peters October 8, .1986 Page 3 *, :' I, Brad Buller,, OeNUty Secretary of the Planning Commission of she City of Rancho. Cucamonga, do hereby;ci. tify that the fordaoing l3esolu+.pan was duly'and regularly introduced, assert-i and'adopted by the. Pla Wing Gammitsidn of the City of Rarch(f'Cucamonga, at a reg►tlar meet7ng of '�he_Planning Commission held on the Sth,day,of October, 1986,,by the following vote-to-wit: RYES;`' .-. COMMISSIONERS- NOES: COMMISSIONERS's ABSENT COMMISSIONERS: k i l >,HittN QC LOB O G U pa .. �` U� Car a Y V 0 ntt O•.ad:« a �.2 p NYC d 2 A .�.. A N p .Vmo wY6wn U 4^~ ya1C WabV y Y YGL4O L ram ' h CV« O YiQ wLLO d6p C y+.y a G �d L» tL rnE G .Qia S^ +2= a..�d^ a.' C>; aQ,p UN.. =.bY. ..E.�•».a A C+. y La.0.LOdC sVi .LYR bNM ^V Yw F it a«Y�eWo pau n. aoc� _ Au. > 'cad ��auda jy E O 5 G O L K a 4 � r L p�....v �0 •p V >?`y la 4 qc NmaS •°oo, M". b c a �gEcO uo y� c„';� a... v YL db.. 'e o N or„ U gt: 9-'..i. q:C-0•C- .. a `.Yrq �f1L>o� qq,� Gl.y O•r KW w.LV 4p 4 U iy O: vk dt1 M �4.q q���VN M�� NCW9�� w!!-. g' Ems► N.N� pL0 O V GN 4R Vq� ,•O,'O t YZb {V�V u fO.y b ,,CCp_w.V 2"'+• U V p^'V —E Z7 Y�'+OGD G.U.+ Mt1t ¢Cw� }.0 LLpa..l V i I t O get L>... ELp VG � uG oN `, � W Nqp L G -LV Ofi GYL.G.• Y w �.L YN t „u q ti � • f bLY G C= • � 1. '1� � V N p L ay �.Sti dvI +p N N C. � `. /-• 6� C /+ ^G pia... � a. Y � Y iiyy y q0. q > t s _, . 1.... �I.Oi�c 6CiaA4 Pa OTio� •..aT� O E•+rr q y r O a.. -@ 4lk G+P d@ G+^ a y C p M`p y O. yv nT q'YO a^ NC.N A `Y VO Yy E v 0 ..0. 34N V pqq0�•• G6.. uLC.y vN m.+a i1u0a«o 4= .p Nq qq E A Npu « 4d O q $YY O« p..�\Aqq.� NUNi ar n� c� rae q 0.... ^q N q O U ,L q.O w V p.}.� G� p OL r�� z+u aL N p•NN^ 'cw aY4c�=aa vYi: O^« T�^~ L o L4f=-� maa 0,��CTU•Ol. p�0. y Ny=A «~ O c o N z a u o o Ly c^ VLo = u U. a a.ssy- q u po a�C. ov aq ra «:L 0.o'4'n. .c..0i a•A o:N� p�0 •� q d i v t EE q e v « v v q a 4 Q � ''YL .s ��CB iLWV•"' �.qa« qq.-,p qON S•=6Y Ate. �oM ..... e« 2- e dpc 4c,^q a @� r Sri. �i,e'pi Ln�e q@� L xmv® •� qv _ a9 s ' e-A T °' 'ao nNou A a�vq m' m�mc u c,PT Np« a �4- SO OiLy.O yrC� T.Ui L /•a O yP C N •.. �Oq Y«9V«.wp V?Cu i a rO�d L Gq�R q U 1Y q Lp V+ Cam- a0yu T- O A O. V O.L.=W 3 i�.•� VN N ee= Y d O 4 M A i p._ O ..[ N 0 9 y A n O Y I C 'O P• L O E r N P 0. N `a ab. 44 A4u«.r ¢nl' 4q�6L400. ^ t � "m c •piw NN4�tSnYY..Oq �wuifNa�C� W•c^^Z �C 6.L qY..i N60. it � 9 Y pVC V^: •O C �Q • C9 V i b:C 6$ O.S aq o CarNL�i.O cMw as L dU2t: \ 'i m & p u vS�TO as onA aqo uL o =c�ov� opVt r5^ec waNz� rai u.E4 •q U O Cy4 4.a d u -!!« y- qi O O �:.a y 4QIL + O «O sA1 U 6 A^ d M O L 1Y G y N y S U h..` Cq O 6 .'•WZ .N ppU V L CI CpGu y. VLrO.Oi� .6 «O LO4 � ra LO:�r�gwC. vt^CC ^L � - �� M^ r. all/y� C • � OU N•\ q� CCam.. .06.^ q=6 2 r�aq� di OOa a«x 9� 'v2 Z.a> :5 QyN L{ uHM CN N� yN �.^4' q qv� � au iRoM.�9 M aoq.Ri NUCa$RY y� a �' LS4 C� ON L: S9 Wj+�iNLsq C� Otd ¢G9L Q a v�•+ o'Rgq�•.. �. Zl E�00� �Squ�a C 4 U T L L O 9 b� v�1 L� Yi'.� >•YO - q 4 ^y'.1....Rv4 NCt4«N ¢ 9+ tC Z`.n..Cr CA U9q 6L .G 6P L^p A O L J q vo yamo 'w CA uc v 'L'o �d .,4•� c aX a a raq u.� Nu^ �r sr o o N ZY zq .o Npw o«d+M p c vLw ^ eL-Na, vn O E 4 t! 9«U O e.G r^R .e C G 'C «O 4. a @ O IC vEY. C T q CP E aN Ty Oq!•M.O. f q> d G O.O a U --."a- P 4A L0. •i.•{\ 1-INO «Na 1IIIq qC !U OL94a-a : - 1� yNG )-.wr.w<6L 14 _ .ono To aY: oV °`u o_ oYc�, a.00 crew:.• .L� ^ q 1"' u C E �� a c •�a N P G Y Y O 9•'� c Y y'T.O. _C O Y Q U L r T > �t NwaO'. `w a 'Ov p'o RA...d a cl ti.av ~ Evvo o y' tiv y '. n ' . O L' 9 e E V u Q O L Y O 9 n V c •�O r N Z N2 y Eya... •_ yL �OU�yDYt. •'•�T c av `�~ NdC� O ^. AWN �.Y o •.•O.,•„a UM52NN .G. y P 54 9•.•is O Y 4�9 O C a.•G^G NZ ,L SAC N Yx A.L G dL vv d Y.�N c q tl � a a�S. .oL' d� vK ate. L pO. O.1 c .0 O^ N O. 01 C G LdN¢ q"�I :-a ' N O Y N r N L w OI S •n.P p N ON L A YO W owY` G adN 9}�S� rY C Lmr o [gR ga+ > y�(6K (�xlI' Ti Aqd =.N d64919C:^ O' LOOy d0 dVL R VOd lG \v{y a'q..aL dda�q Y n i,^ L Vd Y i 1 d d tl y 0 N OI Y 9.i y N C � C C c� !' 9y C u G a b 6 J^ I p 0•- d L+ r L L.., u a Y Y N ^ Y T n M u m ER N dA dP rO23-A• d. A� QC OL L N O• E Y 6. L A C O •� Cg a. OLOp q^ fasa 9C.� • Y C O 9 U. C. L N N A.N K N r``4 aai`3 N O::r N L 6 N V r�^a1>OI.A y 6 O K.A+c•O 6 Y. 14 O p 6 r o g, a� aT.g• •-t a•.Y.ve, O, -a AQ M. Epn ioGZL V= Y Pa N�.•�p p '^a N NIr y G L G EE 6 6^ ga L= Ati YY � �6- N^L= Cn =A•Y� :L NOO.yd, NA r .. ; .,G62 d Aprwj,. r Y L d A C C L C N < V Y r Y U c M Y O L d q ` .. .ac'. d ; p n 9 N O E A YL 6 N G N d p V L Eq: AY Y N . A m. OW 0�.6ucY C o . s W 9 L Y Cn '•^ Y. . ar Crop N.Y q Oudi ^A N i + _ aNdi u j �.o Y N O M p O '•' N V dO Y uaiO L uo qE wd N9 dC { AWk 9 r.T. } L L d� �a9dL d Y A>L a twin.0 4A Lm .> 69N 1u ON Kq 6G 1r•Ow Cq K.06 MGAa W60.ti•n.•0 Lo �t S ut N E��^ G .. v e0 a ✓ "N� ',\ Gtia 4Oq O 5,p 4.�L V V D E• O E =u ^ ^V Z O V 6 W O i y q �y x L O� �\ V E mE9 u,.=. V u�Ew V y pink u `uo a� •_ w ed tro a cam' 'yx'°1H v 'w�. Z S p ,O L GI G N F V u A V d V« 1 = p wa C r G y 6 &L0 tov �oq vcta,.3 ea wa, 'rim sSt: O1"a u e c E C V g r V S y ti.'C C q y�N y G0, p y Y O V O V EO r `. A A TK"' q0.. C.. � Oy FLy tt. O L.•.Y p, d- `r V. 6g ro^ W �'U9 «VL NYW -CZ -. E pA �pY G VVCV a Z.O V~p =yN WVV � L� � V=' d qwC OC9 u Yq �C6. xC� 6yV.rC� .Y 9..x. .6 T4YV: ON49C1 v Vp�a.aa Vy Yh C b 10p OY NiS..a x V yOY.!'aa c6 N V9 m p p E 4ti s x 9 u ti v VUSA 9. L 4 VCA f.A` S , V a d0. A C p�. qi0 d 6 4 Lw xiV�.. 1' 6y_. e a •L.qC 6 V ro 9 V dO ePi .T Ac Mn Y? Y r� N V 6 2.. E O.V V Y.>,Y Vs 6 W A L LUG. •n F=•'AVM a-d`6M' Z ta.N.p rroA ad W.L «AVO N N 6UA o•-oA. rga�tV �u� u �nvu0 u¢ .ES Y.. E „rV •OL.y x t L Y y G j.L S �C h,�O N9 L IT`` Y 'V do • t NO "rn{ Ly^. {a. 4 C V J 4 G .=P C 'O�q O Y C S� V M 6^d C V •� _ N L ^N: a Xr i<.i uvsi YC o '^a cc. mi yw' 'Lxs q0� A V^ 'fro � C EppN >Or 9 Gx 3 'aM1 r o Te i a V c _PE go'p�p1 �..r V �y 9Y.d pq JOYw GL FL LLM�N dL d V.� L� C Lt C= VA ^LQ p 7.Ny F,o t Vyy = V. E Ew V� 9�S .n LOn Y OV N.xq 9�V V VU.. o W G V Qt V V E^ d ti OV �dcE uQ dY w Y C 6 0 = Y x 0 a G W D P O.Y d L0 x W g G p t�_N -2?x c�n�i v u yy qa Oyu ��.o. r w vNv qo _ to h.w ep _ ❑$c^�na of xF. v qy,a e+`F.= ^a x r g v A c Z9 �. Eco oy.. N x�gc y ~9 CV VV r rwL 90�« .. V6 6vi �v dN � O LGN . HNa JM. 4N Sq�^ �+LE"� � I�w..•A� 6Sm GutVi� u �W i.Ei H3 G.d�� •� y S L b.�Y 4p Y G J i A L p (y ee C d 2 i v) `• a A Y A O �yy p CL• L � p V d w G L>O�b• !. P.. 9 U ✓f C p N Val _ Ly O p ` G�� QJaOY A YL " A — J EOL 6 C e ex @ E EE n..YT. L L 6N9 • N•+P'I� L Y V yi nQ.G Y` 15 ^CVO •• Y^L �• O 01 OC ,'C ON O 3 �...w. •� i� � L. u f O• L� O . �q a.:92u a.`o uo AIM lw aa t - C L r C aN Am G TO Z. ..E Pum'n• G �6Ni 0 LG .YQ E O♦.v 0'� a AO.yd L d�Cq yLi+ iA b A„ C� ` iTJ. Y^G..�C C� t•.a' a YG GN GZ �o au Ac.. Y o A 01 V. u Yp�. L pE, �a `L My CNC �pw � 6�. uC C YQ' du✓'C ,Oq p�Y J� �Auq e-. j 6Y. N V actin Sot: N Y Y. T...M. L. qY Y E Y YC� 6.•,^b OO � r.L G NO��C. t1 uY.c OV GL L. E Y®Y cin b O.6 d bg 6 a .gyp 45 O� q O O A N A d. ^b a 4 C pG. a O M L Q o'a N y a E. O m N L Y. i L Y 4 G O a n ..G. w .G.' nEz ` O q Cr. Y O S�tOi yyna> GN a y O.lt r•N N Y O N+N• .Y.N. g 4 WAM W 1+a W Y4al a:6 UL�62 �Cy 60 �O�Y F•O 6. a y 14 Is `y � .000E AL. pv � d � ldNUu � U y vat. Jq a.`e q.`o Iz .. `• 1• u L Y .L,Iu G i 'G,. p V $ o 'v U✓ u6 q GL gcgi.✓..L R: ^_ • COI✓Y O g S. tlId yde RG dl C63N R L U u a 0 u N O1 L O 9 .✓ Y . A O 'G G G N S L •,�� O .. U C - 4 p C � OI C O\i C Q� � Y o 1• N � P L C i^ Y � � A G o VG b y Y« �i C� �u.0 m O ✓.G C CUV i L « 9 U Oa Lg .n �u�� •sp �4a ✓ y Gv�V� G u� � w�.v a NE.r. aN `•r O - ret�w. N� v ✓ .pG- u G,arIaLL °' ou„ u' m GW nm A. Lc Vggd GV M� L9L 4OG Y �VpOV a ^ V N� Y Y•+>� vL O. Sv ' U L'L LY � N.y✓i v NV Ooo L tl� ^� U Cv 9.N Nv �...yu 1. �V a�.Q YV Nn.✓ d L` y.. ✓6Y Lv. Lt GU Iy pN .a nvu Y 4 9F:1:✓� U �✓..L1 ^L y O.L'�. +C, Ny .U,a V I•y GOB• GL LTL OIy y✓.6'.. iS C� UYv -^4 :C p oy pC9J�y �W gO.d tAq. `, at L ,` �il SJq ¢ u Ny - ^Ll yt{ Cv �.a. +,. LL >fA�O�L .yd t�ptL .,ri « .✓^ y.. �Lw SL. jc u $ �V�G SUN iC: ✓� Q1T_. VGvI�C Y•L 0..p lg D .n� � O Y,y q✓4 ya yyg W ✓ u N u 1 ^ q c V v u IG. .fin N O�Mvr NV GF !tS 6� W�NLE5 36 Y9' !O Iry .G• fs`•1.OiYW 4GH !Y : d N v tl = Y. 1l�+"L'�• � • CPU d✓I� 61..1. `I 'z_. •. � s N '�� ' N o � �4 L �' ' 9 ✓C GI J �.u u 9 4 I o -u •' ^a n in La ' Yg UA Lp U` � G� 4�N yTid C� Y✓ � L C 4 L �6 C i.t W `':V Y 6r q •J,S O N -v V � tl «ate.. ►b � c " ✓—CC q ` u ^u G ,O 5! T"s ✓t• U,.n. Q GM• C NJ ■ py O W pCLN. HC C m (may CC ■ U ✓ p G p9 c p.U Y E�- =o O• 1 Y p�. C U •q p ✓ G tl s Ya p N.9 rJ � LGa -a 6uri97-� SN e'N L V UC .NN NVt NN 4 a.9S UGO ta- y ;L g` a m►WOC. dUG d u C d C M q N G M Y Ss v O, O,C }@ L y a L.=% L `. p ''p.. L d6CCdy WV� ccL a ��ii - rn G • Vt Wo�� i`.�IV cti 0 z U G 0 4 C� a �Cd Y pr • C M N �T Y n. OVCn^ D LLM OL .NZ� YW VS— a c`q. bo y wri aala Y� \ rn a ► °! m i �aW a'w' uz 'o z `o 'u o" V �� eo L a . � o c •O•L IL<OI L Y Lr L_y � n• tlE o a n.a a.y v a'n a nv. n� co O C C C 2 V ^. H'•.. N .Y M O ••�f W. i ••'�' NO=.0 c]1 �•Lq y n Y Y N O .� Xa L aO _ Xu n wIM La c 3 L T O A Ln 3 q �N 4 H a L G A q E Y �q L`F• �^ n g G �u c M.a � ar, �uwr rH L mom. no. ov a aa ,C unu !-'N�+R•. '44s D^ 4X dN.rN F-O K CG !=� � pj{.ia ZOIc. �MO �4G xl CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA &CAMo STAFF REPORT DATE: October 8, 1986 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning 'Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Associate P�anner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT',14=31 - DIVERSIFIED - The revir�i of e:comp lanceage�iiopping Center W:th, the approved plans, located at the south side of Lemc Avenue, east side of Haven, and north side of Highland Avenue - APN 201-271-53 I. ABSTRACT: The Planning Commission, at the September ?, 1986 f regu ar meeting, directed staff to prepare a report regarding the height of the building as it affects views for residents along Lemon Avenue. II. ANALYSIS A. Background: On April 24 1985, the Planning Commission reviewe the final design of the proposed project and conditionally approved theHaven Village Shopping Center as shown in Exhibits "B", "C' and "E". On September 24, 1986, the Planning Commission conducted the public hearing again to review the redesigned` site plan of Phase III development. At this meeting, a member of the public, a resident along Lemon Avenue, raised concern regarding the-view along Lemon Avenue being 4lacked by the new construction of the shopping center. Its order to determine if the developer has constructed the Project according to the approved plans, staff has compared actual construction with the approved plans. Based upon site inspection and review of the approved plans, the following are staff determinations in each area of investigation 1. Elevations: The approved elevations as shown in Exhibit -'r are—the same as those shown in the approved' construction plans. Further, staff made a field investigation and has determined that construction is in conformance with the approved plans. ITE!1 M ' PLANNINI: CIGNM1SSION STAFF REPORT ° CUP '84-31 - DIVERSIFIED October 8, 1986 Page'2 2. _Grraa_d_ing The preliminary grading plan approved by the Grading Committee shows that the building pad elevativon for Retail Building 1 as shown in cross section of DO (Exhibit "E2") shows a 22 feet difference between the top of the carb along Lemon Avenue and the building. The` ` developer;/had proposed to excavate the 22 feet down on the north end in order to alleviate visual impacts to the ° northerly residents along Lemon Avenue. The final grading plan that was approved for construction shows the same pad elevation as previously approved in the preliminary stage!. Site inspection verifies conformance with the approved plans, 3. Building Height: These approved drawings (Exhibit"C2") shows the Leman Avenue north elevation which clearly indicated that both towers and the extended portion of the parapet for Screening the roof equipment are above the street grade along Lemon Avenue.. The building height for the top of the parapet is 22 feet, while the extended parapet part Is 24 feet, and the tower is 29 feet measured from the finished grade. Therefore, the range of extender+ height from the top of the curb along Lemon Avenue ranges from 2 feet from the top of the parapet and 1 7 to 9 feet from the tower. Site inspection confirms that the building is being built according to the approved plans. s III. RECO14MENDATION- Staff recommends that the Planning Commission review the t above resu is of the investigation and provide staff with direction. p Respeptful 1�t Brad Bu ler - City Planner BB:NF:ko J Attachments: April 24, 1985 Planning Commission Minutes and Staff Report j March 25, 1985 Planning Commission Workshop Summary y February 27, 1985 Planning Commission Minutes and Staff Report Exhibit "N" - location Map Exhibit "B" -Approved Site Plan Exhibit "C", Approved Elevations Exhibit"D" - Elevations from Construction Plans Exhibit "E" - Approved Grading Plan rn E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84-31 - DIVERSIFIED " PROPERTIES-- The development of an integrated shopping genter.;of approximately 118,988 square feet which includes a gasolink_> set°vice station, as proposed Phase I and a conceptual master plan for future phases. All on approximately 15 acres of land in the Neigborhood Commercial (NC) District, generally located on the northeas�; corner of Highland Avenue and Haven Avenue APN 201-271-53. (Continued front March 27, 1985 meeting.) Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. John O'Meara, representing the applicant, stated that the plan before the Commission addressed all of the issues previously discussed. Chairman Stout asked Mr. O'Meara if he would object to a condition requiring the storefronts to be submitted for review by the Design. Review Committee, Mr. O'Meara replied that he would have no objection. There were no further Comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. " The Commissioners commended the applicant for hi's;�rk,and cooperative efforts { in the redesign of this project. - Motion Moved by Stout, seconded by Barker, ,slue a Negative Declaration and adopt the Resole:*ion approving Conditional Use Permit 84-31,,,with an added condition to require review and approval of the storefront designs by the Design Review Committee. Motion.carried by thefollowing vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: STOUT, BARKER, MCNIEL, REMPEL I NOES: .COMMISSIONERS: ' NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA . -carried F. ENVIRONPc L IMPACT REPORT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 84-03-A' H&H - A request to the General Plan Land Use Map from Lour Density Residential (2-4 to Medium-High Residential (14-24 du lac) on 13.55 acres of land located o e south side of Feron Avenue, between Turner and Ramona - AN 209-085-0 ,. 14. (Continued from April 10, 1985 meeting.) Lisa Wininger, Assistant Planner, gave an overvie , the EIR and significant impacts associated with the proposed General Plan Amen Planning Commission Minutes -3- April 24, 1485 "1 -- - — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO:tiGA Lc�sr STAFF REPORT � 771 z v9 DATE: Apri1 24, 1985 M 7 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City planner, BY: Dan Coleman, Senior-Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84-31 D D„ D I { •,e deve ailment of an integrated shopping center of approximately 118,988 square feet which includes a gasoline service station, as proposed Phase I in a conceptual Master Plan for future phases, ali on approximately 15 acres of land in the Neighborhood Commercial District, generally located on the northeast corner of Highland Avenue and Haven Avenue APN' 201-271-53 (Continued from March 27, 1:985 meeting). I.. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission, at~its meeting of February 27, 1485, continued this item to hold a special adjourned meeting with the applicant to discuss design issues. The purpose of tha workshop was to discuss site planning, pedestrian orientation, and architectural design issues. The following is a summary of the Planning Commission's consensus: Architeci; 're. The towers io the northeest corner and southeast corner of the site should be strengthened by adding river rock veneer, with the remaining towers to receive wood siding or similar non-stucco treatment. In addition, the sides of the Lucky Supermarket flanking the entrance should be provided with river rock veneer detailing. With regard t6 the storefront wintiuw options, the Commission recommended that details be provided for the Commission's consideration. Site Plan. The Commission recommended strengthening the linkage between the free standing buildings through design of the plaza areas: to avoid a strip commercial appearance. Pedestrian Orientation. The expanded pedestrian plaza areas should e provided with a less formal and more rustic landscaping and hardscape treatment compatible with the craftsmen architectural style of the building. The pavement material should be compatible with the river rock veneer. The Commission; r'eauested additional details of the connection to the Lynhaven affartment project to the east. 14 PLAR 1NU COhM;LSsV� ST t� '�REPORT - d Environmental iss,-.meat & CUP 34-31 -'DIVERSIFIED U . Apri 24,. I985 t Page 2 Sign s. A Uniform Sign' Program should be developed with the uniform' size, location, copy, and color, except fnr the major tenants. The ai-Jlicant has substantially reviSEd the p�roject design based ' upon the Planning Commission's direction aS'_r,rlown on.the attached exhib ?5. Attached for your information is the original staff repor,�,oaf February 27, 1985. II. R6C6MME'NDAT10W. If the,Planning,�Lommission can support the Facts for Finding as describQ **the or.aginal staff report, approval of the project and issuance of,;a Negative Declaration through adoption -a of the attached Resolution would be in. order. r � ' ift tfufy submitted: R k mez y nnerDD:nsIF achments: February 27, 1:985 Staff Report Exhibit "A"All - Locatiow-41a, Exhibit 1186 - Site Utilization mops Exhibit x'G" - Detailed site Plan' ' Exhibit "D,+__ Landscape plan Exhibit "E" Plaza Details Exhibit 'IF" _ Lighting'Plan Exhibit "G" - Grading Plar! Exhibit "F1" Elevations Exhibit "I" - Pedestrian Access'Plan Exhibit "0" - Pedestrian Details Resolution of Approval' with Conditions f, t y', i MEMO TO FILE DATE: March 26, 1985 SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF 3/25/86 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP FOR CUP E4.;31 Ar PROPOSED REVISIONS: ,., Revised plans show craftsmen, California Bungalow architEytul-20 style with cedar shingle roofing, double beam canopy, riverrock buik4ead .and off-white plaster highlights. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS:, ; Developer:should consider the possibility of a 2-story building to to located at the northwest corner of site for restaurant, open patio use. o The pedestrian pavement should compliment the proposed riverrock treatment. Uniform sign color, style and placement preferred. Maximum 3 colors with 1 color designated for minor tenant. . r, Preferred wood doors. Develop should offer several differen, storefronts for tenant selection. o The proposed plaster material conflict with riverrock. Wood siding would be preferred on stucco/plaster with heavy horizontal lines. o Additional landscaping in front ot,.bullding. o Sidewalk connections between free standing buildipg. o Provide landscaping along pedestrian connection to Bentsen project to the east. SUMMARY OF PLANNING COMMISSION CONSENSUS: 1. Architecture o Storefront details be provided at Planning Commiss'Al meeting. o Add riverrock treatment to towers. o Other towers and areas shown using stucco shculd he replaced with wood siding. v i • " 2. Signs o Uniform sign program should,estalbish uniform color (maximum 3) exedptJfor,logosl: size, and placement. • 3. Pedestrian Connection o' Provide,`-larger scale of pedestrian connection for review. o 'Provide a separate plan showing just pedestrian l ;pkages throughout the site. 4 o Design of pedes5triar, connection should be less formal and more rustic looking. ' o Provide details s6wing connecti3n-to Bentsen project to`the east. _ o Provide special paving materi, be compatible with ' k- ri verrock. s., The Planning Commission adjourned the Wiorkshop to April 24, 1986 regular Planning Commission meeting ,�f' 9 r � Commission NrcNiel returned to the podium. a K. ENVIRONMEhl t ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84-42 - ORATE - The establishment f a church facility in a 1,Z70 square foot area of an existing 6,560 uare foot multi-ttinant industrial; building within tF.e General Industria area (Subarea 4) located-on the south side of 6th Street and the east We of Archibald Avenue - APR 210-07-48, Dino Putrina, Assistant Plann -, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout opened the public h ring. Jim Orate, applicant, stated'concurrenc with the staff report, Resolution and Conditions of Approval. There were no further comments, therefore the ublic hewing was closed. Motion: Moved by Chitiea seconded b Barker,:u i sl carried, s y mou y c reed, to adapt the Resolution approving Environmental Assessment a Conditional Use Permit 84-42, and the issuance of a Negative Declaration,. ` AYES: COMMISSIONERS:; CHITIEA, 'BARKER: MS. I PE'„ STOL NOES: COMMISSIONERS; PONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: WORE carried L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84-31 - DIVERSIFIED' PROPERTIES - The development of an integrated shopping center of approximately 118,988 square feet which- includes a gasoline service station, as a proposed Phase I and a conceptual master plan for future l phases. All on approximately 15 acres of land in the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District generally located at the northeast corner of Highland Avenue and Haven Avenue - APN 201-271-53. Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. John O'Meara, 270 S. Bristol, Costa Mesa, stated that the applicant's understanding is that they would be reimbursed for one-half of the roedian island and signal costs on Haven Avenue, and would like that to be a part of the Resolution. Craig Nelson, 10657 Lemon, Rancho Cucamonga, opposed the project due to r increased traffic which would be generated, Planning Commission Minutes -7 February 27, 1§85 `r ` F There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Gommtsiidner Barker stated that he sit on the first Design Review Committee and that the project had come a way Asince that time, but questioned if it had come far enough rJ terms of the site plan, architecture, parking, etc., to M bring it into`c:,.�'ormance with ...he policies of the Development Code. He reiterated his concerns with the five straight buildings as proposed and the provisions for pedestrian access. Commissioner McNiel stated that while therproject, had improved„ it haCnot yet achieved the desired,'level for Haven Avenue and. still appears like any other shopping center. Commissioner Chitiea stated" that she was aiss:a--isfied with the project and suggested it be entirely revised. a Chairman Stout, stated that although he appreciated the applicant's efforts, r this shopping'-1;.center was designed without: Rancho Cucamonga in ,mind. He further stated that the architectural statement is typical cal for. Commercial areas and not appropriate for Neighborhiod Commercial. Commissioner Barker stated that he had no problems with either continuing or denying the project,' However, if the applicant would concur, it would be ,. preferable to continil the public hearing on the project to allow time to work_ with staff and the a�,plicant on a redesign. John O'Meara stateo"that he would reefer to continue the project if he would' have guidelines set to avoid a repeat of this situation. He suggested that the applicant could meet with the Planning Commission and staff in a study session. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Barker, to continue the public hearing for Environmental Assessment and and Conditional Use Permit 84-31 to the Planning Commission meeting of March 27, 1985. The Planning Commission further directed staff to 'arrange a special meeting between staff, the applicant, ,and the Commission within 30 days. . The,motion passed by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS REMPEL, BARKER, MCNIEL, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEq ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried' Commissioner Chitiea stated that she was in favor of denying the project rather than a continuance. Planning Commission Minutes -3- February 27, 1985 �r CITY OF R XCHO CUC NIO\G ��c^off STAFF REPORT DATE: February 27, 1985 is" TO: Chairman andMembers of the Planning Commission FROM;. Rick Gomez, City Planner . BY: Dan Coleman;, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84-31 �. DIVERSIFIED PROPERTIES �o The development of an integrated shopping center of approximately 118,988 square feet. whi2h includes a gasoline service sta'�;ion, as a ` proposed Phase I and a conceptual master plan for future phases, all on -about 15 acres of land in the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District genera.ly located at the norther-- corner of Highland Avenue and Haven Avenue - APN 201-271-i3. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: r A. Action Requested, Approval of site plan, elevations, and issuance of a Negative Declaration, B. Purpose: Multi-phase` development of a neighborhood shopping center. C. Location: East side of Haven between Highland and Lemon. D. Parcel Size: Fifteen (15) acres, E. Existing,?onin : Neighborhood Commercial. F. Existinq Land Use: Vacant, a G. Surrounding Land. Use and Zoning: North Sin-1e family residential; Low Residential. South Vacant; Low Residential. East - Vacant; Medium-High Residential.' West Vacant; apartments, *ervice station; Medium- Residential and Neighborhood Commercial. H. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Neighborhood Commercial, _ North Low Residential, South Low Residential East Medium-High Residential. West Medium Residential and Neighborhood Commercial. , ��Q `> PLANNING COMMISSI," STAFF REPORT Conditional Use P'c„nit..84-31 Diversified February 27, 11985 Page 2 x F � I. S'6te Characteristics: The pro"Ject site is'vacant and slopes to the south. at approximately 4 t,16 5% grade. A sparse east-West ;'.zucalyptus windrow traverses the middle of the site. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: Access to the shopping center will be provided via the new signalized intersection at Alta Loma Drive with proposed temporary access to Highland Avenue for Phase I. The shopping-center will be anchored by a major grocery store that will support a variety of retail shops, 30,000 square feet of restaurants, avid a service station. Phase 'I construction will include,a majority of the northerly 11 acres of the site. h B. Issues: The first issue regarding to site olar;ning and hl placement of-the buildings' relates to pedestrian: orientation and amenities. The General Plan encourages pedestrian/bic ele orientation versus automobile orientation for the neighbor,iood shopping centers. To implement these policies, the Develof$ment Code shopping center criteria were developed to. require) that "vehicle and ,,peOestrian access is coordinated and logically linked to provide a comprehensive circulation system." Further, the Development Code requires that neighborhood shopping centers be "planned as a group of organized uses and structures." The proposed site plan, Exhibit "C",_`indicates five 'satellite buildings along Raven Avenue. A pedestrian linkage;-Js provided from the main project entrance on Haven Avenue through the parking area to the retail shops, then easterly to connect with the Lan Bentsen apartment project. A series of three plaza areas have been rovided at various locations within the center. The second issbe is whether the pro used.architectural desian- is__consistent with the obiectiyes of the General Plan and Develapment C Both the General Plan and Development Code policies ar,9design guidelines emphasize strong architectural character Within neighborhood shopping centers. The Development Code states that, "a recognizable _design theme shall be established for each building. That theme shall be one which creates a harmonious building style, form, size, color, material and roof line, as it relates to surrounding planned or existing developments. Individual structures shall create and enhance a high quality and harmonious community appearance." The proposed elevations indicate the use of those design elements familiar to Southern California shopping center design, such as, machine applied exterior plaster, and 'canopy overhangs with concrete tile roof material. In addition, river rock, wood veneer,bay windows and other architectural details have been added below the canopy line. PLANNING COMMISSYir. STAFF REPORT - Conditional Use P&aiit 84-31 —Diversified f , Februar�J 27, 1985 , Page 3 AM C. Design P wiew Committee: The Design Review Committee has revlewed'lthis project on two -separate occasions and; expressed concerns,/"regarding the significance of this shopping center l based -_-,Pon location on a Special Boulevard and,future freeway, f.` visibility. The following is a summary of the main issues and 4 " applicant's 'solutions: Site Plan: A major pedestrian focal point should be provided NY creating a large plaza connected to smaller plazas. Smaller- plazas should be emphasized In terms of pedestriad amenities and human-scale design. Solution: Appli Ont redesigned storefronts to orient towards plazas and provided pedestrian features (e.g., seating,' shade i trellis). " Parking:' A landscaped entrance statement should, be provided by s ' eliminating parking on both sides of main entrance drive and expanding pedestrian l-inkage ;rrom Haven.. Solution: Applicant eliminated some, but not all parking Jqlh spaces along main �,Irive. Pedestrian linkage expanded to 15-251 k in width,. Building Locations: ' Combine; buildings- or group them to eliminate multiple satellite buildings along Haven which fragment site plan. i e jolution; Plaza provided between two E?iiiidings north of main j entrance, and between Pad #1 and buiyding to the south. No buildings combined. Architecture: Create a strong architectural theme using rustic - materials e.g., stone, wood), variable storefront setbacks, and roof heights, details (e.g., paned windows, bay windows, j lights), and colors. Solution: Storefronts underneath canopy redesigned with rivLr rock and detailing. Signs: Sign criteria for center, except major tenants, should: be of a generic style with a single letter style and color. Solution: Applicant proposing no uniform letter style and a four color palette (similar to Gemco Center program)_ ' 1 r `"1 Z 77777—_ , �. . _ Pk"INING COMMISSZC/_-TAFF REPORT _ Cod,,r,itional Use"Pe�.,nt 84-31 - Dive~sified t Fe!/i'uary 27 1985 A,. Page 4 D. Grading Committee: The Grading Committee had ,s1g ificant concerns regarding the proposed cut and fill of the site that would create significant slope heights on the south side of Lemon Avenue and at the southeast Corner of the project Site. Further, the proposed retention basin located in the southerly portion of the site was not considered acceptable f-om an engineering and ;drainage standpoint and therefore has' been eliminated from th("-,gradinq plan, Exhibit G. Phase I f'?. construction, would be. ceptable Frcon a drainage standpoint if existing flows in Haven Avenue north of the project were taken off at the Alta Loma basins.,. This would permit' Phase I drainage onto Haven Avenue,. 1Regarding the development-,'of Phase II, construction will require installation of the master planned subdrain or an acceptable alternate drainage solution. The balance of the undeveloped. Phase II should drain intn�fie adjacent master planned storm --train to be installed bS. ie adjacent apartment project. Based upon the Grading Committ Os input, the Design 'Review Committee approved the cut and fill slope heights ,"subject to condition for dense landscaping' treatment to soften the appearance of the slopes. 'E. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Checilist and determined that although the project could have a significant effect on the environment in terms of drainage and traffic impacts., there would not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation aeasures described on. the attachment to the 'Initial Study will be required as Conditions of Approval to the project. If the Commission concurs with said findings, then issuance of a ' Negative Declaration would be in order. IIL FACTS FOR FINDINGS:' In considering the proposed Conditional Use Permit, the Planning Commission must make the Findings that the proposed project design and site„is consistent with the Development Code and General Plan policies' described above for neighborhood shopping centers. Further, the proposed development, together with the 'Conditions of Approval, must not be detrimental or cause significant adverse environmental impacts. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in the Daily Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. To date, ,;no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. fin - 13 PLANNING COMMISSF' STAFF REPORT _ Conditional Use, PLiflit 94-31 - Diversified February 27, 1985 Page 5 V. RECOMMENDATION: If the Planning, Commission can, su�oort the Facts - a for Findings, a-i solution of Approval with Cgndrtionz�is attached f for your consideration. However, if the. Planning.Corimiss cannot v support the Facts for Findings, then the project should,bi denied ' 8 a. :•inconsistent .with the Development Code and General' Plan ' Pol lcie Resp j► 1y'sub iitted Rtck me z //ty fanner :D :ns i -Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map i Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Map txhihit "G" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Landscape Plan Exhibit E - Plaza Details 4 Exhibit "F" - Lighting'hlan Exhibit "G" - Grading Plan` Exhibit "G-1 - Grading Sections Exhibit "NI - Hydrology Map Exhibit "I" Elevations Exhibit "J - Storefront Elevations �^ Exhibit "K" Perspectives and Lemon Avenue,Section Initial Study,- Part II s.` Resolution of Approval E i 4 iiiliHf ■ �, �� � Iiii • �1 i S rr t $»iy �.Y __!� • �i yrare Ells; HIM �� • • { F r t f tic .1 U4 Iwsd^"•.uA .. � l.esF ..'�\\sg Z`�S� r NSF. 31 Ji ��'I }a ��•_ � � ei it .�aY 7.��\\ i'�e"�\`l• �j. !I. �4}. � � �"Y� ! �(�Ir� r� I C'�`` �. �, 1. �';'\`tS�, �\•�J -.. �i F�� � +� r a;iar.. xa.ua- a utr ! I I ! it J Y ui .rah: i N 14 �► � 4. is — � .� •— a S H w4' ' f6r,a� , o 3-1 W' � A 7 L t Cu'n w• VL ;4. YL m IT � - LaLlf ' y to ccii � CLO ► } a ! fr ug o�� - ' {{• _ rat i �_ ' I O G f s nti FLu ul r a aw j Lr„ t `V (1 utf M-a ,\ + G 3 }L lu tu a t I "� � � Y ,`1 �l � r•n l4. '4 k fi MAR ul ZA rid c .. Sd � 6 } � u{ — +. PAD♦; p — � { I � '04 f 1�t51� '• ---�---.-....._. t J4_.... ..�: m .CyZ,.^. ,►�'�`..�.�..d r��. : s �LiGU5TpUM LRIDINM k1c3un61NO Ef{ i.1 `*lob TURF i�,t inax.7 t� o l" % � 1 ? ro•+-�... � itlf^- i "T` � ( try� �,.-a�.�--"�. �� '"! � �` i�:.f�i •ama;a '�' 'Z Q '- >,yq.r.« , 11FtI( �•: �,'.� //'=�{ - }5 )+ _ ` =E t�j AI `,� - © - �✓Fed. �t 146 Z. i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GUCA'11p< o U 1977 DATE: October 8, 1986 ` . TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner` BY Dan Coleman, Senior Planner ' t SUBJECT: TERRA '+IIaTA HOUSING AFFORDABILITY UPDATE I. BACKGROUND: The Terra Vista Community Plan ,")rovides for a community-wide density bonus of one dwelling unit f6r each dwelling t; unit which is affordabb"le to luw and: moderate income families. Lewis Homes has submitted a report to the City which documents how. many dwellings released in 1984 and 1985 meet the affordability`: criteria, thus qualifying for the density bonus. The total density bonus cannot exceed the number of affordable units ;provided, or 1,218 units, whichever is less. This report is provided to the Commission for information only, and no action is required, ; II. ANALYSIS: The following analysis has been organized;to relate to the affordable 'housing policies and the density distribution plan policies as contained ;n the Terra Ista Community Plan Text: A The Comm It Plan rovides for maximum variation of u to 25% of t e ensl ty of any one nei. h omo The Terra Vista` Community Plan contains a density distribution plan _which indicates the mid-range densities for each residential development area. Development in individual areas may vary from the miniir�,m to the maximum permittad by the land use density range,' provided that the ultimate density of the neighborhood does not exceed 25% increase.' The following tabulation illustrates that the distribution of bonus units- complies with this reg4irement: AMh ITEM N C) , >„ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Terra Vista Housing Af'foHability Update October 8t 1986 ` Page 2 TABLE A Original Plan Proposed Plan Percent Total D/U's. Total D/U's Increase Northwest Quadrant 2,650 2,612 (1.4%) Southwest Quadrant 2,346 2,849 2i.0% Northeast Quadrant 1,209 i,512 25.0% Southeast Quadrant 1,915 2,357* 23.q% r TOTAL + 8,120 9,330 j *Includes 20 acre site being amended from Junior Nigh School to Low- k Medium"'Residential (4-8 du/ac). B. The Community Plan Provides for a densit bonus ro rim wherein , a densit onus of one a iti na unit wi 1 be' grtean for I every affordak a unit provide , ithin Terra Vista. Further. �; a the density bonuses.granted for a far able �ro�7ects wi t`-`'�i not in total exceed the number of affordable units provided, nr `` C ,2 8 units whichever- is ess. The affordability analysis � see attached indicates that a Eotal of 641' existing dwelling units are affordable to low `ant� 'moderate income households. This repress t�-7-1.5% of the total f97 dwelling units released for occupancy in '964 and 198b. Therefore, as of December 31, 1985, Terra Vista has qualified for 541 bonus units. C. A aoal of the Community Plan is that 15% of the homes in each of,the four neighbor oods of Terra Vista will be of ordable to low and moderate incomefamilies. Construction in Terra Vista" has been limited to the northwest quadrant with the exception of Tract 12673, an apartment complex located at the northeast 1 corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway,. Within the northwest quadrant, a total of 897 houses and apartments havebeen released by year end 1985. Of these, a total of 641-;were affordable; therefore 71.5% of the homes within the first neighborhood of Terra Vista were affordable to low and moderate income families. A more detailed breakdown is provided below in Table B. l 7 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. REPORT Terra Vista Housing Affordability Update �. October 8, 1986 Page 3 TABLE B Year Affordable Affordable Affordable Total of Units to 50-80% to 80-100% to 100-120% Affordable Release Unit Type Released Households Households Households ' Units ` 1984 Apartments 152 88 64 4- Houses (,, 171 -0- 18 121 139 1985 Apartments 270 50 165 55 270 Houses 304 -0- -0- B0 80 Totals 897 138 247 256 641 Percentage of Total Units (100%) 15.4%) (27.5%) (28.5%) (71.5%) D. The Community Plan goal is that approximately 5% of the dwellings within Terra Vista will be affordable to fami I i es with 10O to 20 of median income 59 to_those with 80 to 0 of 'median; income and 5 to those with 50 to 80 of median income. ThiTtranslates, into approximately 45 dwelling units far each of the three income ranges indicated. The Terra Vista affordability- analysis concludes- that 28.5% of the released dwellings were affordable to families vith 100 to 120% of median income', 27.5% were affordable to families with 80 to 100% of median income, and 15.4% to those with 50,to 80% of median income. III. CONCLUSION': The Terra Vista housing affordability analysis made by Lewis Homes documents that Terra Vista is meeting or exceeding its affordable housing goals. 4sRectfully s itt d Buller City;alanner BB:DCrns Attachment: Terra Vista Housing Affordability Analysis t TERRA VISTA HOUSING AFFORDABILITY ANALYSIS March 18, 1985 The Terra Visti Community Plan provides for a community-wide density bonus of one dwelling', unit for each dwelling 'Unit which is affordable to low and moderate incomr, families, The Plan provides a goal that at least five percent of the t=nits will be affordable to low income families (those with less than 80% of:the median household income); another five percent will be affordable to 16'tderate-low income families (those with at least 80% but less than 100% of the median household income)'; and a third five percent will be affordable to moderate-high income families (those with 1,0% to 120% of the median household it,come, inclusive) This analysis documents how many Terra Vista dwellings released in 1984 and 198& meet these restrictions, thereby qualifying for the density bonus. For both apartments and:houses', the criteria set forth in the Community I Plan are that the units either must be priced such 'that low and moderate income households can afford them, or must be occupied by such households. i The attached Exhibits "A" and "B" indicate haw the housing affordability criteria set forth in the Terra Vista Community Plan have been met from the c project's inception through the end of calendar 1985. Exhibit "A" deals s with for-sale homes. The first columns show;the tract and lot numbers for all new homes !released for sale through year-end 1985. The other columns show the financing method used, the date of release, the Riverside-San Bernardino Primary Metropolitan Statistical Area (PMSA) median household income level at that date, and the release price. The final three columns indicate the lowest of the three tar{let income groups to which each home was affordable. These three columns are additive - that is, if a particular home was affordable for a household in the 80i to 100% of median income group, it is not also 'listed as affordable to the 100% to 120% category, although any home affordable to lower-income buyers is, of cor.se, affordable to higher-income buyers as'weli. Affordability was determined using standard 'lender qualification procedures for the different financing programs that were available for each project at the date of release. Once the income levels were determined, we attempted to qualify these incomes for homes at the various release prices. We used qualification criteria supplied by Great Western Real Estate. They provided us computer programs which contained the various qualification guidelines for the different financing plans we used. By inputting the selling price, buyer's income, monthly home maintenance costs, monthly state and federal tax estimates, etc., we: were able to determine the maximum selling price for which each of the income levels could qualify, As can be &ien in the tables, households 7n the low income bracket have not been able ti qualify for a new home. Those homes for which moderate-Tow income households could qualify are indicated by an "X" in the next-to-last Terra Vista Nousit 9 AffordabiI ty,-Anal ysis March 18, 1986 ` Page 2 l column of Exhibit "A", thane for which only households in the moderate-high• income level could qualify are noted in the ast column - . For apartments, the test of affordability is ;that rent levels be less than 30% of a target{,household's gross monthly income, The median income level for each release date was determined, and the three monthly maximum rent levels were extrapolated therefrom. By comparing the maximum monthly r?rt levels to,-the actual rent amounts at release, we were able to determine the number of apartment units affordable to each of the three 1,Kome levels. (R. The attached Exhibit "B 'shows the type, number, a�td�rent levels for Tract 12402 (Parkview Plot-'U, partments) and Tract 12365 (Mountathview I Apartments)'. The, last columns reflect the number of units which were k affordable at :Tease to, the three income levkAs. As with Exhibit "A" ' thes,z columns are additive, so a unit which is affordable for a 5Q% to 80% renter is not double counted by listing it under the" other two affordability classes. Including both apartment and house units, we have released 897 dwelling units for occupancy, Of these, 15.4% (134 units) are affordable to low income households;, an additional 27.5% (247 units) to moderate-low households, and an additional 28.5% (256 units) to :-moderate-high households,- In total, 71.5% (641 units) are affordable toC18w-to-moderate ` income households. KM:KNN:kr:550r I i j _5' TERRA VISTA HOUSING AFFORDABILITY INFORMATIQ' SUMMARY ,a YEAR AFFORDABLE AFFORDABLE AFFORDABLE TOTAL UNITS TO 50-807' TO 80-100 , TO 100-120% AFFORDABLE RELEASE UNIT TYPE RELEASED HOUSEHOLD.- HOUSEHOLDS' HOUSEHOLDS UNITS 1984 Apartments 152 88 64 -0- 152 Houses 171 -0 18 121 139 1985 Apartments 270 50 165 55 270 Houses 304 -0- -O- 80 80 Totals 897 138 1N7 256 641 Percentage of 1 total units (100i) (15.4%) (27.5%) (c $ 5 ) (71.5%) /J a F 031886:KKN:kr:650m(15) EXHIBIT "A" TERRA VISTA NEW HOME RELEASE PRICE AND AFFORDABILITY INFORMATION AFFORDABLEI AFFORDABLE2 AFFORDABLE3 RELEASE MEDIAN RELEASE TO 50-80s TO 80-100% TO 100-120% TRACT LOT FINANCING 4 DATE INCOME PRICE BUYERS BUYERS BUYERS 12316-1 3 A 060984 26,000 91,950 X 4 A 060984 26,000 99,200 x 5 A 060984 26,000 99,200 X 6 A 060984 26,000 91,950 X 7 A 060984 26,000 99,200 X 8 A 060984 26,000 54,200 X 9 A 060984 26,000 90,950 X. 10 C 060984 26,000 100,950 11 A 060984 26,000 87,950 X 12 A 060984 26000 96,950 X 20 A 060984 26,000 99,200 X 21 A 060984 26,000 89,500 X 22 A 060984 26,000 90,950 X 23 C 060984 26,000 100,950 24 A 060984 26,000 90,950 X 25 A 060984 26,000 99200 X 26 A 060984 26-000 87,950 X 27 A 060984 26,000 99,200 X 28 A 060984 26,000 97,500 X 29 A 060984 2�,000 89,950 X 30 A 060984 Z1,000 99,200 X 31 A 060984 26"000 90,950 X 32 A 060984 26,000 87,950 X 33 A 060984 26,000 97,950 34 A 060984 26,000 98,950 X 35 A 060984 26,000 87,950 X Tract totals 26 units 24 24 affordable units 12316 1 A 061084 26,000 90,950 Y 2 A 061084 26,000 97,950 X 3 A 061084 26,000 87,950 X 4 A 061084 26,000 98,950 X 5 C 061084 26,000 99,950 6 A 061084 26,000 87,950 X 7 A 061084 26,000 90,950 X 8 A 061084 26,600 98,950 X 9 A 061084 26,000 99,950 X 10 A 061084 26,000 9i,95C X 11 C. 061084 26,000 99,950 12 C 061084 26,000 100,950 13 A 061084 26,000 88,950 X 14 A 061084 26,000 98,950 X. 15 C 061084 26,000 99,950 031886:KKN:kr:650m{1} EXHIBIT "An TERRA VISTA NEW HOME '1 RELEASE PRICE AND AFFORDABILITY INFORMATION € =;AFFGOABLEI AFFOPAABLE2 AFFORDABLE3 TRACT 4 RELEASE MEDIAN RELEASE .`iP 50-80% TO 80-100% TO 100-120% LOT FINANCING DATE INCOME PRhE BUYERS� BUYERS BUYERS 12316 16 A 061084 26,000 98,950 X 17 A 061084 26,000 91,950 i 18 A ;�061084 26,000 98,950 X ' 19 A -).084. 26,000 89,950 I; 4 C G61084 26,000 90,950 , [ 21 C 061084 26,000 99;950 22 A 061084 26,000 87,950 23 A 061084 26,000 91,.950 X r 24 A 061084 26,000 97 950 X 25 A 06, OK, 26,000,,_ 89,950 X 26 A 061084 26,000 93950. t X 27 A 061084 26,000 91,950 X € 28 A 061084_ 26,000 88,950 X 29 A 061084 26,000 91,950 X 30 C 061084 26,000 99,950 31 A 061084 26,000 98950 32 C 061084 26,000 99ti950 X 33 A 061,084 26,000 90,950 , 't s�4 A 0c 0 X, 84 26,000 97,950 X B 3.i H> Ob1084 26,000 97,950 ! ft A OF1084 26,000 88,950 X w 'IPact Totals joy units 28 �' 28 afff�?dable units ' 12317-1 ? A 060984 26,000 84,500 X t\, 2 A 060984 26,000 88,500 X i 3 A 060984 26,000 97,5(?0 X 4 A 060984 26,000 84500 X 5 A 060984 .26,000 88,500 _ X 6 A` 060984 26,000 84,950 X 7 A 060984 26,000 90,950 X 8 A 060984 26,000 88,950 t 9 A 160984 26,000 97,950 X 10 A 660984 26,000 85,500- X 11 A 060984 26,000 97,9.50 X 12 A 060984 26,000 85,950 X 13 A 060984 26,000 97,950 X 14 A 060984 26,000 88,950 X 15 A 060984 26,000. 84,950 X 16 A 060984 26,OP 8e,950 X 17 A OGO984 26,000 97,950 X 21 A 060984 26,000 96,950 X 22 A 060984 26,000 87,950 X 21 A 060984 26,000 83,950 24 A 060984 26,000 96,950 X ! X 031886:KKN:kr:650m(2) _ i r EXHI%IT "Au TERRA VISTA NEH HO1,iE RELEASE PRICE AND AFFORDABILITY INFORVATIOft 0 r AFFORDABLEY AFFOFDABLE2 AFFORDA8LE3 4 RELEASE MEUTAN RELEASE TC 30-FOot TO 80 10M TO 100-120% �ItACT LdT FINANCING DATE 4 INC019E PRICE BUYERS BUYERS BUYERS 12317-1 32 A 06IO84',,` 26,000 91,950 x 26,000 98,950 } x 33 A 061084-=-26,000 89,950 x 34 A 061084 26,000 98,950 x 35 A 061084 26,000 90,250 x 36 A 061084 26,000 86,950 X 37 A 061084 26,000 91,950 x 38 A 061084 26,000 99,200 X. 39 A 061084 26,000 98,500 x 40 A 061084 26,000 89,950 x 41 A 06IOd4 25,000 98,950 x 42 A 061084 26,000 98,950 x 43 A 061084 26,000 89,950 x 44 A 061084 26,000 86,950 X 45 A 061084 26,000 99,200 x 46 A 061084:"-'26,000 85,950 x 47 A 061084 26,000 87,950 x 48 A 061084 26,000 97,500 x IMIk 49 A 061084 26,000 83,950 X r. 50 A 061084 261000 97,500 _ x Tract totals 41 units 12 29 41 affordable units 12317 1 A 062384 26,000 86,950 x 2 A 062384 26,000 98,950 x 3 A 062384 26,000 11,500 - X 4 A OMj4 26,000 87,350 x 5 A 062384 ";26,000 99,200 x 6 A 062384 . 26,000 87,350 X 7 C 062384 26,000 100,950 8 A OG2384 26,000 90,530 x , 9 A OE2.384 26,000 97,950 X 10 A 062384 26,000 97,95E x 11 A' 062384 26,000 89,950 x 12 A 062384 26,000 85,950 x 13 A 062384 26,000 97,950 X 14 A 062384 26,000 89,950 x 15 A 062384 26,000 97,930 X 16 A 062384 26,000 97,950 x 17 A._ 062384 26,000 97,950 x 18 A C52384 26,000 85,950 x i9 A 062384 26,000 90,950 X 20 A 062384 26,000 89,950 x 21 A `071484 26,000 87,950 x 22 A 071484 26,000 97,950 x 031886:KK9:kr:65Om(3) it nl EXHIBIT "A" e TERRA VISTA NE14 HOME f RELEASE PRICE AND AFFORDABILITY INFORMATION AFFORDABLE AFFrjRDABLE2 AFFOR6ABLE3 RELEASE MEDIAN RELEASE TO 50-80`,. TO (0 ]00t TO 100-120% TRACT LOT FINANGTNG4 DATE INCOME PRICE BUYERS _ jYEFS BUYERS 12317 23 A 071484 26,000 86,950 X 24 A 071484 26,000 98,950 25 C 071484 26,000 99,500 26 A 071484 26,000 88,500 X ' 27 A 071484 26,000 91,500 % 28 C 071484 26,000 99,500 2,9 A 071484 26,000 87,500 X 4 A 071484 26,000 91,500 X 31 C 071484 26,000 99,500 32 A WiASA 26,000 91,500 X _. 33 A 071484 26,000 91,500 X. 34 A 062384 26,000 89,950 X 35 A 062384 26,000 97,950 % 36 A 062384 26,000 89,950' 37 A 062384 26,000 97,950 X 38 A 062384 26,000 90,950 X;,,, 39 A 062384 26,000 90,950 X 40 A 071484 zo,000 ;89,950 X 41 A 071484 26,000 ' 97.:9ic,_ % 42 A 071484 26,000 `- t,95d X 43 A 071484 26,000 89,950 X r 44 A 071484 26,000 97,950 % 45 A 071484 26,000 86,950 X 46 A 071484 26,000 89,950 % 47 A 071484 26,000 97,950 X 48 A 071484 26,000 85,950 X 49 A 071484 26,000 89,950 % 50 A 071484 26,000 97,950 _ -==X Tract totals 50 units 6 40 46 affordable units 12364-1 4 B 100684 26,000 112,950 5 - 100684 26,000 122,500 6 B 100Eu4 26,000 115,500 7 8 100684 26,000 112,950 8 B 100684 26,000 113,950 9 B 10061.34 26,000 117,950 i0 B 100684 26,C00 111,950 11 - IOC'684 26,000 123,950 12 B., 100684 26,000 119,500 13 B 100684. 26,000 112,950 14 B 1�130684 26,000 114,500 15 - 100684 26,000 U%500 ry 16 B 100684 26,000 111,--950 23 B 100684 2",090 120,950 031G86 kr-65Gnt%4 1 EXHIBIT "A" KAsk. TERRA VISTA NEW HOME RELEASE. PRICE AND AFFORDAB:IITY INFORMATION AFFORCABLEI AFFORDABLE2 AFFORDABLE3 RELEASE MEDIAN -RELEASE TO SO-SOS TO 80-100% TO 100-120% TRACT LOT FINANCING DATE DATE INCOME PRICE BUYERS BUYERS BUYERS 12364-1 24 B 100684 26,000 113,950 25 a 100684 26,000 112,960 26 B 100684 25,000 117,950 27 B 100684 26,000 109,950 Tract totals la,vaits 0 affordable units 12364-A 1 B 012685_, 26,000 113,a50 2 012685, 26,JOD 122,990 3 8 OIZ685 26,000 U05,950 4 B 012685 26,000 117,500 5 B 012685 26,000 17,95t) 6 012685 26, 00 .24950 7 - 0126as 26,000 122,950 8 8 012685 26,000 114,500 9 B 012685 26,000 113,950 14 B 012685;� 26,000 116,500 11 B 012685 .. 26,000 113,950 35 B 012685 `;; 26,000 117,950 36 B. 012685 26,000 119,500 37 r [ "'685 26,000 123,950 38 8 012686 k6,000 11S500 39 B 012685 2ti,000 11L,1,500 40 - 012685 2ai,000 125,950 41 - 012685 26,000 124,950 42 B 012685 26,000 117,603 43 13 012685 26,000 116,500 44 - 012685 26,000 12fr 45 - 012585 26,000 124,S60 Tract totals 22 units 0 afi,-dable units 12364-8 12 041385 26,06D 1?5,500 13 - 041385 26,000 129,500 14 B 041385 2F.,000 116,950 15 041385 26,.000 125,950 16 - 041385 26,000 123,95E 17 - W 3B5 26,000 127,500 18 B 'A1385 26,000 113,500 19 B ' 041385 26,000 115,950 20 0413a5 26,000 123,950 21 - 041385 26,003 123,950 22 B 041385 26,000 113,SDO 23 B 041385 26,000 118,950 24 041385 26,000 129;950 031E8b;�Ki1;�r:55C�1{5) rl EXHIBIT "A" ` TERRA VISTA NEW HOME RELEASE PRICE AND AFFORDABILITY INFORMATION AFFORDABLE1 AFFORDABLY, AFFORDABLES RELEASE MEDIAN' RELEASE :,rJ 50-80`; TO 80-106� TO 100-1201 TRACT LOT FINANCING DATE INCOME PRICE BUYERS- BUYERS BUYERS 12364 25, - 1385 26,000 126,95D% : 26'1' 1385 26,000 129,950 :* 27 B ,1385.. 26,000 119,950 28 1385 26,000 131,,.950 29 B " 1385- 26,000 120,950 30 - 1385 25,ti0(i 129,950 31 - 1�85 26,000 127,950 32 B 1385; 26,000 115; 50 33 B 1385 26,000 :1117,950 34 138F, ?600b 123,950 Tract totals 23 units R. O affordable units 12590-1 1 i A 032285 26,000 97,950 X_ 2 A 032285 26,000 104,950 3 A 0322,QR3 26,000 95,950 x 4 A 032285 26,000 96,950" X 5 A 032285 26,000 103,950 X 6 A 032285 96,000 105,5C� 7 A 032285 26,000 96,950 x 8 A 032285 26,000, 105,500 y 9 A., 0322",5 26,00r' 103,950 X io 'A 0=65 2 tiri0 96,950 x 11 A '032285 26,000 94,950 X 12 A 032285 26,000 115,950 ` 13 A 032285 26,.000 95,95C x 14' A '032285 26,Ovo 106,950 15 A 032285 26,000 93950 x 16 A 032285- 26,000 115,950 17 A 032285 26,000 95,960 X 18 A 032285 26OOC 94,500 X 22 A 032285 26:000 114,950 23 A 032285 26,000 95,950 X 24 A 032285 26,000 104,96' 25 A 032285 26,000 97,950 x 26 A 032285 26,000 104,950 27 A 032285 26,000 105,950 Z8 A 032285 26,000 113,950 29 A 032285 26,000 94,950 X Tract total 26 units 15 15 affordable units 0318B6:KKN:kr:65Om(6) EXHIBIT "A" r TER cK VISTA NEW-HOME RELEASE PRICRAND AFFORQABIL?TY,INFORMATIOP! � AFFORDABLEI AFWROABLE2 P.rFORDABLE3 4 RELEASE MEDIAN REL£ASC", TO 5040% TO 80-.100,", TO'AOO 12O" TRACT LOT FINANCING DATE INCOME PRICE BUYERS BUYERS <BUYERS 12590-2 1 A 060185 26,000 107,950 2 A m.185 26,OOtj 95,950 • X 3 A 060185 26,G00 108,950 4 A 060185 26,000 97,950 X 5 A 06�'285 26,000 113,950 6 A 062285 26,000 99,950 . 7 - 062285 26,000 122,950, X 8 A ` 062265 25,000 112 950 9 A 0601E5 26,000 109,950 10 A 060185 26,.000 94,950 X 11 A 06018.5." 26,000 118 -y50 12 A 062285 26,000 1950 13 A 062255 26,000,Z98,950 X 14 - 062285 2&,t;olf ` 123 950 15 -4 062285 26,€100 112,950 16 A '062285 26,000 98,950 X 17 A 062285 26,000 110_0F;, ; Q 18 - 062285 26,000 124936 19 . A 062285 26,000 112,950 ' 20 n 062285 26,00Q, 112L,950 21 A 062285 26,004" 97,950 - X 22 1 052285 26,00D 122,950 23 A 062285 26,000 95,950 Xr 24 A 062233 26,000 99,950 X 25 A 060185 26,000 94,J50 X 26 A 060185 26,000 167,950 27 A 060185_ 26,000 109,950 28 A 060185 26,000 99,950 x;: 29 - 060185 26,000 121,950 30 A 06C185 26,000 95,950 X 31 A 060185 26,000 107,950 32 A 060185 26,000 97,950 X A 0.30185 L6,000 109,950 'r^act totals 3;1-w,.:ti 13 13 at`a:dabla units 12590-3 8 - 072685 26,000 124,950 9 B 072685 26,000 102,95 10 B 072685 26,000 112,950 J3188b:KKN:kr:650m(7) ;;4:' iXHI61T 14A" i TERRA VISTA NEW HOME RELEASE PRICE AND AFFORDABILITY INFORMATIoN AFFORDABLE) AFFORDHBLE2 AF�'ORDPBLES RELEASE MEDIAN RELEASE TO 50-80" TQ 80-1CGa TQ 100 1200 TP.ACT- LOT FINANCING4 DATE INCOME PRICE BUYERS BUYERS_ RUVERS , 12590-3 11 B 072685 4a,000 109950 12 B 072685 26030 91 95U 13 072685 26:000 121950 14 B 072685 26,000 - 15 B a072685:; 26,000 97:950 ;J ` 16 B 072685 26,000 98,950 ` 17 072,685 26,000 122,950 p 18 $ 072685 Z6,000 104,450 ' 19 B 072685 '26,000 111 9K,O 20 B 072685 26._000 109550 21 B 0726a5; 26,000 98,500 22 B 0726L, 26,000 . 110,500 23 B 072685''. 26"000 110,950 -; p Tract totals 16 emits O affordable units 'r 12590-4 1 C MUF5 26,000 117,950 2 8 041386 26,000 94,500 X 3 C 041385 26,DO0 107,950 AN 4 C 041a05 26,000 106,950 r 5 C 0413d5 26,000 106,950 6 .. 041385' 26,000 98,950 X 7' A 041385 26,000 97,500 X C 041385_ 26,000 106,5Q0 w B 041385" 26,000 95,500 ` A 041385 ' 26,000, 98,950 X I1 C 041385 26,0'_: -107,9550 12 B 041385 26,000 94,950 , 13 A 041385- 26,000 97,950 x 14 C 041385 26,000 108950 19 C 041385 26,000 1090500 20 B 041385 26,009 97,500 21 A 041385 26,U00 98,950 X .2 B 041385 26:000 94,950 X 23 C 041385 26,000 107,950 24 B 041385 26,000 97,50o - 25 B 041385' 26,000 94,950 X 26 B 041385 _ 26,000 27,500 27 C 041385 26,OUO 11506o j 28 B.. 041385 26,000 96,350 29 B 041385 26,000 `94,950 ,X 30 L 041385 26,000 I'05;950 31 C 041385 26,000 107,950 r Tract totals 27 !nits c� 11 affordable -jnts 11 i 031886:KKN:kr:65Or.(81 i ,4 ! --1 EXHIBIT "Are 71 �\ TERRA VISTA NEW HOME RELEASE ?RICE AND AFFOR0AKLITY INFORbtATI)N F , � 1� AFFORDM E AFFORDABLE AFFtRDABLSi 4 RELEASE MEDIAtr' RELEASE TO 50-80% TO 80--100% TO 100-120% TRACT LOT FINANCING DATE INCOME PRICE BUYERS BUYERS BUYERS i2590-5 1 A 032285 > 26,Cr 0 951500 x 2 A 0322F5' Z6�000 89,950 X A 0322�5 7f�;'000 711,9'SQ 4 A- 032285 7_�6,000` 103,500 X 5 A 032285 26,OOG 94,500 x := 6 A 032285 26YOG 103,500 X r A 032285 26,000 111,950 8 A 032285 25,000 92,950 x 9 A 032285 26,000 102,950 X <. 10 A:, 032285 - 26,000 93,950 X 11 A 032285 26,000 1Q5,950 12 A 032285 26,000 55,950 X 13 A 032285 26,000 94,950 x ." A 031285 ; 2& 000 91,950: 15 „ A 032285 26,000 94,950 X 16 A 032285 a 000 104,500 17 A 032285 26,000 94950 X 18 A 032285 26,000 113,950 19 A 032285 26;Vi* 94,950 X 20 !A 0322R5 26,00V 103,950 x 21 A 03'C285 26,O,g0 91,950 ' x 22 A 032295 26,110 113,950 23 A 032285 26,-000 94,950 X ?4 A OM85 26,000 101,950 25 03,,285 26,000 91,950 x 26 A 0i32285 26,000 104,950 27 A '032?85 26,000 94,950 X 28 A 032285 26,000 91,950 x 29 A 032286 26�000 113,950 30 A 032285 26;?90 89,950 x 31 A 032285 26,00 94,950 - x 32 1 032285 2611000 104,950 Tract totals 32 units 22 22 affordable u 12590-6 i A 041385 26,000 95050 x 2 C 041385 26,000 105,950 3 A 041385 26,000. 95,350 x 4 C 041385 26,000 117,950' 5 B.• 041385 26,000 91,500 X 6 B 041385 26,000 94,950 x 7 C 041385 26y000 115,500 8 C 041385 26,000 1Ca,950 9 C 041385 26,000 115,500 10 B 041385 i.-MO 94,950 x 031886:KKN:kr:j5Oirf9j I I EXHIBIT "F" I r i TERRA VISTA NEW HOME RELEASE PRICE AND AFFORDABILITY INFORMAT_TIO AFFORDABLE4 AFFORDABLE2 AFFORDABLE 4 RELEASE MEDIAhi RELEASE TO 50 80p TO 80-100% TO 100-120e TP.ACT L-T FINANCING DATE It;C0t4E PRICE BUYERS BUYERS BUYERS . 12590-6 11 C C.x1385 26,100 108,500 12 041385 26"000 95,950 X 13 C Q?�1385 26,000 104,500 14 B ;:.,,3 ���,85 2b,0� 00 89,950 15 , C 6413E5 25,000 113,950 , 16 A 041385 26,000 95,950 X 17 A 041385 26,000 95,950 X 18 C 041385 26,000 114.5Q0 19 C 041385 26 000 113 9'50 20 B 041385 '26,000 :3950 X 21 C 041385 26,000 ,,113950 '+,r 22 C - 041385 26;000 104,500 28 C 04185 -26,0P0 115950 '4 B 041385 26,000 95,950 25 C 041385 26,000 104:950 26 B 041385 26,000 94500 X 27 C 041385 26,000 104,950 28 B 041385 26,000 94500 X € 29 C 041;.35 26,000 104,950 AOL s 30 n 041385 126,000, 90 950 X 31 C : 041385 !26,000 .105,500 32 B 041385 26, OO R4,950 X Tract totais ;`units 14 14 affordable units 12C90 1 B 102685 26,800 99,950 2 B 102685 - 26,800 10:,950' 3 B 102685, 26,800 119,950 4 B 102685- 26,800 JOG,950 5 B 102685 26,800 99,,950 6 3 102685 26,800 119,950 7 B 102685 26,800 9.4,960 X 8 B 102685 26,800 108,500 9 B 102685 26,800 98,950 10 B 02685 26,800 93,950 X 11 B 102685 26,800 108,950 12 B 102685 26,800 120,950 13 B 102685 26-800 122,950 14 B 102685 26800 97,950 X 15 B.. 102685 23,800 106,950 16 B 102685 26,800 99,950 _ 17 8 102685 26:800 120:500 18 B 102685 26,80E 119,950 19 B 102685 26'1'800 99,500 20 B 102685 26,800 108,500 031886:KKN:kr:650m(10) 5 it EXHIBIT "A" TERRA VISTA NEW HOME ' RELEASE PRIcf AND AFFORDABILITY INFORMATTbN lw, , AFFORDABLE AFFORDABLE2 AFFORDABLE' RELEASE MEDIAN ,RELEASE TO 50-801, TO'80-100a TO 100-120o TRACT LOT FINAtdCING4 GATE INCOME TRICE BUYERS BUYERS BUYERS 12590 21 B 102685 26-800 120,500 22 B 102685 25,800 99500 23 B 102685 26,800 108,500 2! B 102685 26,800 102,950 2a B 102685 26,800 122,950 ��. B 102685> 26,800 101,950 S17 B 102685 26,800 99,950 18 -B 102685 R6,800 119,950 B' 102685 26,86D 98,950 tiD B 102685 26,800 107,950'' r 1OZ685 26,800 94,950> X t , Tract Totals 3'1 units 4' 4.affordable units {e 12319-1 1 B 100585; 26,800 119,950 :2 B 100585 26',800 123,,500 3 B 1005125 26,800 118;950 4 B 100585 26,800 119:500 100585 26,800,' 129,950 6 B 100585 26,800 117,950 7 8 100585 26,800 123 500 ;i 4 - 100585 KI;800 129,950 9 B 100585; 26,800 I2b,950 10 B 100585 26,800 119,500 11 - 100585 26,800 129,950 12 B 100505 26800 117,950 13 - 100585 26,800 131,500 14 8 100585 26800 118,500 15 B 100585 26,800 -124,500' - 16 B 100585 26,800 120,950 17 B 100585 26,800 125,950 18 B 100585 25,800 122,950 19 B 100585 26,800 117,950 20 - 1005u,5 26,800 131,950 21 - 100585 26,800 130,950 22 - 100585 26,800, 150,950 23 B 100585 26,800` 123,500 24 ` - 100585 26,800 131,500 25 6 100585, 26,800' 122,950 Tract totals 25 units 0 affordable units - 031886:KKN:kr:6SOm(I1) p -1-7 ' EXHIBIT "A" TERRA VISTA NEW HOMEAsk RELEASE PRICE AND AFFORDABILITY INrORMATION AFFORDABI.Fl RFFORDABLE2 AFFORQABL"3 RELEASE MEDIAN RELEASE l0 50-80;1 TO 80-10.0% TO 100 121~N TRACT LOT FINANCING4 ---OAiE lr1GOME _PRICE BUYERS BUYERS BUYERS - 12319-4 1 .8 11168� 26,800 : 100,950 2 B 111685 26,E�O:r` 109,950 3 A 111685 26 aub I1095r 4 8 111685 25,800 103,950 ' 5 B 111685 26,800 97,950 'X L 6 B 111635 .2E;An_d' 101,950 7 B 111686, 26,800 114,950 8 B 26,800, 113,950 9 B 111685` 26,800 100,95d 10 B 111685 26,800 110,950 li B 111685 26,800 122,500 ' 12 B 111685 26,800 110,500 i 13 B 111685' 26,800 111,600 F 14 B 1;t1685 26,800 '115 509 15 'B 111685 26,500 112,500 16 8 111685 26,80 113,950 -17 B 111585 26,800 11Q,950 is B 111685 X,26,800 iCG',950 { 19 B 111685 26,800 "111,950" - 20 B 111685 26,800 ,101,50p 21 B 111685 26,800 99950, 22 B 11i685 26�800 111 500" 23 B 111686 26;`80O 0,500 24 B 111685 26,800 100,500 25 B 111685 26,43Q0 . 98,950 26 B 111685 26,600- 123,500 27 B 111685 26„800 113;500. 28 B 111685 26,800 124,500 29 B 111685 26,800 111,500 30 B 111685 26,800 99,950 ' 31 B 111685 26,800 125,500 32 B 111685 26,800 112,500 33 B 111685 26,800 115,950 34 B 111685 26,800 99,500 35 B 111685 26,800 100,950 36 B 111685 26,800 122,950 37 B 111685 26,800 110,950 Tract totals 37 units 1 1 affordable unit Released through ysar-end 1935 totals- 478 total units 18 201 219 affordable units 031886:KKN;kv:650a(12; f �( 1 • EXHIBIT „A" , IL NOTES 1) Buyers in this category have a household income of tess'`than 80 of the 'Riverside San Bernardino PMSA median. y., 2. Buyers in this category have a househol14 income of Treater than' flr equal to 80%, V; but less than 100%, of the riverside-San Bii^n�lFdino PMSA median. 3) Buyers in t} s category havfi a have a household fncome of greater than or equal to 1GUg, but not greater than 1200m,; of the Riverside-:.Ian Bernardino PMSA median, 4) Financing piens user..' `X A) Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency Mortgage Revenue Bond Issue of 1983 (9'.801;6�GPM). B) Rancho Cucamonga:4edevey6pment Ag¢ncy Mortgage Revenue Bond Issue of 1984 (11.125% epm), ` C) City of 'Rancho Cucamonga Mortgage Revenue Bond Issue of 1984 (11�2% GPM). ARk 03f8B6z1'KN:kr:550m(13) ' o rn cn p w .N 1zm o t o n rn ,T o m a: 3 < o x CA _ CD w o-ao ,+r+ rr tn •47, m NJ y C'S as '.A j Co Cl En .r G ('+ 3 < o -S r+ G C+ o r+ -h r m,xe e cr m v) o rim re m e ti_ �(a oro1 m I si c� os i n a`t, -Gs s a'r, m t wm mG Co _ + o cr rD 3 i m A un 7 p A, rya 0 m m 0317) •.S 'rJFWro vOi to3'�5 " - a N dw � a r-ci aim �' aoi °, m m 3 _., s s c a = -n n a o a iTl avOi y o ti tam r# a c rD Wwmmm NNa✓cTt v ID b+m 3 G 77�^7a Wa-C7-�h f 4 I (D O y p C1 0 C C. .�. 3 rt rwN.nx��W h:�W v :n ' a-d tZ ,OO f1 �• CL bz'y. co CO G 1D rL ..t N. V N I:C71 4'7 LP.fil U, 'Na1 W:aA W N: T III X (D CD C) O N(D �e tR -S 7 3 m U7 CJ!U UT N' N !N:a7 T»Cl. C CA rr1 -oh o o -' oS, vi o G / o rc?rah toa c no ry ra m >r c. -S 'h co 41 'S Cy.. 3" to A '� t a W t0. �m m tD O -.., ph, �` Ol m v:v 1+ chi^ i a W :\.7�C 1'+^`, m '1 CD 0--S N !-+ 4 C.+(D �"' U Cl O`.1 A :n C�G5 V C m --� G m •-•r0.. x to n s'C o o a cn o r3 Ili o m--1 -h.c+ m N. W r+ ;"' -a O O Cn t:•, W (y m ' � ms -s CD o s + Imir < m '� w G� r+ io o ' Q. m -S. 3E to K m ry G O G(71 C) m �•G W O 3 m U.3 3 C 1(D 3 to 3 CIl C'F O. -S f0 .�.. r+ O N N W(J G] 1 CU Oa C 01 {f m 2 T O m O O O" om ro rl rcj "a f7a '`-7.-i d rr m G.m C-+ [r �. m r1 T (�Ru!.#y:(yq. n n a. to O U1-M 4..-A O A.:t.Law :rn-i O j•C. r+a �"'rj ?. O 3 C1 C•+ N 01 rn OS tY D> Lh.-.1 1 '.'Z rr( �} 41 , -'fi�D ry .61 rp C:'1 Q G m m(•(Q S Ntiz, O1 ITO o .<S p - Cy N Q- O �Q C.Q"� N +79 �C? :N J j -fi A n'>' y y A O C) O C+ S D M C'+ O -if Z CT� K •H. Cn " m ' r C Z N O r -n G J.C7 •+' S� G L'i F-+1--:F-•l-1. G w Z, mC) O Na N w W O Q,W.C'S C1 4. q -s CC tC N 1„ C. C t•? .H `'' y- (D. _1v 3.+ C1 cm-- 3 m w w O n'. '1p C)ch £p' �, �` to OCT U1 U'1 4p NIVOCa mOO. �. N(D S r C,1, S1 {� N V x. rG.{. o• + + + + + .+ + + ++ -i rO-,�-_� - (D. W O 41 O N ( 1-••1 C)c+ -O 3 O3 ro0 O _�., W O.:OODC:r O C7d00 (, iv aE a ae a �c m o +nl U1 t,n O O O O O O Q C3 No + ofa oaE m,, uae o :Dc vro + + + + t + + + + + " m ( 3a' (n 1v r 0 ooc)Q o c=)oQa 4bq =c„ CITE',-'41 RANCHO CUCAMONGA Srtniff REPORT a o c� y— DATE: October 8, 1986 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City„planner 6Y: Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner Alan Warren, Associate Planner SUBJECT: MODIFICATIONS TO MULTI-FAMILY PARKING STANDARDS A amenae pmproposa ent Code to upgra a existing parking requirements for all multi-family projects I. BACKGROUND: On several previous occasions, both the City. Council an a canning Commission discussed the issue of parking standards for multifamily projects, with the intention of modifying existing parking standards to improve both the usefulness of required parking and the quality of multi-family projects in the City. So far, the Commission provided staff with specific direction In the following areas: A. Eliminate file differences in parkin, standards between ments an condominiums. The Commission..re t�at recent ti'en s in mu t - am y development,,in Rancho Cucamonga have obliterated virtually all differences between condominiums and apartments relative to parking, partly due to the fact that apartment projects are built with future conversions in mind, and many condominiums are being rented out as apartments. As a result, the Commission directed staff, to prepare a;,single set of 'parking standards applicable to all multi-family' projects, without the distinction between ownership ano re,! 1 housing. P. Consider increasing the existing numerical requirements, The ommission inaicatea that the existing numerica stars ar s are at times inadequate, and instructed staff to look into the issue with the intention of assuring an adequate number of parking spaces in all multi-family projects. C. Develop criteria, for covered�►•W�i�_ng. The Commission expressed pre erence or requ�r�ng crvered' parking within enclosed garages. However, the Commission also r--cognized that tyre f are Certain problems associated with garages, and that garages are not that best solution in all situations. Staff was requested to develop criteria under which garages or carports may be acceptable to fulfill the covered parking requirements, and also to develop stronger design standards for parking f� st-uctures in general ft ITE!1 0 PLANNING COMMISSION' STAFF REPORT Modifications to.Multi-Family Parking Standards October 8, 1986 Page 2 d t` This report discusses issues relative to increasing the existing numerical.. standards and criteria for covered parking in do separate sections, which' to low: E u s II; PARKING STANDARDSAUMERICAL RKT'9EMENTS: Based on previous ommission direction, the E stin`g"-)w T- amity standards for both apartment units and townhomes/condos would look as shown on, the �. chart below: PARKING $PACES PER UNIT Total Covered Tye oi` Unit Spaces Required Spaces Required Studio 1.3 1 ; One Bedroom 1.5 1:0, �p Two Bedroom 1.8 1.0 ., Three Bedroom 2.0 1.0 Four Bedroom and Larger 2.0 1.0 �d Note: In addition, open visitor parking, is currently,SSrequi red at the rate of .25 spaces per dwelling unit. A review ofexisting multi-family projects recently constructed in the V;`Ity that are fully occupied would seen to indicate that existiing standards do not always ju;drantee that parking needs of all_ProJects are fully met on site: `phis"is exhibited in the small amount of overflow parking taking place along- public streets along the periphery of several projects, .-particularly those with a greater proportion of larger units. This would seem to indicate that consideration of slight increase in the number of spaces required may be in order, particularly where larger units are involved. Based on our experience, staff would suggest the following criteria for th4 purposes of discussion: f a A xt 7t"_ANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Modifications to Mu1t4-Fam)1y Parking Standards ,�. October 6, 1985 2 \ Pace 3 POTENTIAL PARKING REQUIREMENTS/SPACES U UNIT tl�; Total Covered Type of Unit Spaces Regaired Spaces Required,; Studio 1.3 > i One i,Qdro(rj 1.5 Two Bedroon 2.0 t l Three Bedroom 2.5 2 Four Bedroom and Lcrger 3.0 2 ' 3� Again,. visitor parking would be 'required at the existing rate of .25 spaces per dwelling unit. It should be noted that the most marked increases art-NUc.gested for the larger units, and that tw) cov,;red spaces would be consid4red for units of thane bedronM% ,or larger. It should also be noted that thase potential modifications have not been discussed wi+.h the ` development community at any length. It is suggestzd ;sat adequate feedback be obtained 'prior to any final action. III. CRITERIA FOR COVERED PA KING A. A.�licatiori: As already; mentioned, the Commission expressed a preference-for fully enclosed garages rather than carports, but recognized that carports may work better in certain specific situations. Based on this diree.lon, the following text may be l considered`for inclusion in the City`s Development Code; For all i equired "overed parking spaces, garage structures shall be provided, )lie City recognizes, however, that specific site or design features way result in conditions which warrant- limited use of carports is order to attain any of thL, following desired results: 1. Reduce building mass Wthin the complex. 2. Olen up lines of sight from parking area to landscape area or to signiricant architectural features. 3. Allow design fiexibility to provide variations in site and architectural features wfiere deemed desirable ,and necessary, In any prnJect, however, no less than 50% of the required covered spaces -ay be In gara�jes. PLANNING COMMISSIGN STAFF REPORT Modifications to Multi-Family Parking Standards October 8, 198E Page 4 Aw Ct B. Design: 'Ir,, staff's review of multiple family parking,',-'two i ., major isslts surfacer; from which ' our analysis evolved. Firstly, 'multiple-family complexes are designed generally around two opposite concepts which are as follows: a. _ Perimater loop driveway and parking areas. This type of " esTign:prove des the maximum interior open space allot.;,env adjacent to the residential structures, but adds a,".arge degree of i nc�-�eni ence due to the lengthy walking di/,lance to the parki4ny}ypaces. These projects segregate "cormunity activity" a.�ay 4rom the perimeter., b. Dispersed driveway and parking areas. This design type K provides a.Brea ea o user convenience tiy_,placipg:.the parking spaces closer (or adjacent toy to tL residential' unit, but much of the potential landscaped open space__is used up by meandering private streets and driveways. - The driveway areas become a part of the "community" activity in this typet' of project. "Tuck-under" parking dictates this tyke ofT esign. While there are some advantages associated`' i+ith the ;concept cf parking dispersed throughout, the o proportion of paved;areas is substantially higher. Secondly, while garages tend to convey a more substantial,- , permanent development than those projects with carports, their, use exclusively dnes not necessarily provide a better project from a design standpoint. Mar,} projects with garages: tend to exhibit s cluttered, monotonous and uninviting area of a complex. With these issues in mind, staff has drawn up a list of design criteria for both. garages:.land carports which could be incorporated into existing development policies:Site Design: Openness and reduced structure mass should be pane characteristics of parking area design as implemented by the following; P. Long, unbroken lines of opncsing garages[carport_v on each site err a drive aisle should be avoided. Thus type of design results in a "constricted alley" atmosphere. 2. Frte standing garages/carports should be located to not disrupt the primary view of the residential structure. 'i y� uu mil` 1 j P1 A`wING coMMTSSION'.gAFF REPORT Modifications to Multi-Family narking Standards � October 8, 1986 Page r 3. Vi ews to',andscaped areas should he'imintained at•.the ends of �'i.ive aisles.,_ vista?'should not be obscured by €acing garas(es or carports. 4. Piarai_r,_breaks along thk parking aisles. This festure adds a,•landscaping Jemeni into the parking. drive aisle and. can Torm an i..teresti�ig pattern ta- the * driv arkin, �ll'�R g area rhythm.. S. SaMgesfcarparts should bs limited L'a w side ;of a lengI, drive aisle. T is se-attire would open .up more of king area to adjacent landscaped open areas - =lf'w nild further reduce the effect along the drive aisle. Architecture,, garage and.<.Prport des; ;n should exhibit designs gw�i`gh p c tible, supp:rtive and filly integrated into thc- overall " at itectural theme as implemented through the fotlrn \ lions; 1. Garage%arprs-t structures should be limited in length - (14mit 8-12 ears?:._ Una structures present d�lfficuities in keepihq propohioas appropriate 10th p the original design intent on the maiyi structure. t 2. Recognize,garage doors as an-el Ott of design, rilytt%v and use to create varying patterns. Extensive use of single width garage doors si3oula be avoided., llte perception of increased density cart result, from a parking area with large numbers of garage doors. Further, an overly repetitious pattern of doors'.;�m be monotonous and difficult to design .around. ttauble width doors in combination with sinnlcS can help ie. the problem. 3. 'Flimsy`s °stick-Uke' carport resigns which portray an add-on, afterthought, noa-impermanent-percaption of the parking area should, be avoided. and other elements should be integrated into the structure design: to convey a-more substantial and permanent concept for the carports, 4. 'Hang-on" storage waits which- again appear to ;W afterthoughts to the carport design sh-muld he avoided. Additi anal,:`cri ter ia may be developed With the Commission's direction., i PE ANNINC CO SSION STAFF REPORT ff4difications to Multi-pariiy Parking`Standards October &, 1986 Fage fi k M RMONMENDATIONS- It is recommended that the Com+riSsic: preAds staff with specific direction in ;the areas outlined, if - appropriate, staff can be directed to ,prepare appropriate Ordinances for future consideration by the Planning Commission and the City Council: ill Res fully .teed, it r: V-3 _Butler City -i—nner i BB•OKa",W,ns t