Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986/11/12 - Agenda Packet �. Qzf .l 1 8; Pna 5„ V`�Vvi'v'��✓ �,` ��R'4 C.T'Y;UF, HO CUCgA1C3NGA PtikNNING MON L3d..;it IDA 1977 - WEDNESDAY NOVEMBER 12,1986 7:00 p.m. LION&PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE I"s 86NCH6 CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNI � I. PPledge pf Allegiance 1 . M Ron can Commissioner Barker Commissioner Tolstoyy CommissionerChitiea�•: Commissioner Stout Commissioner McWle1 rv. i;pproval of Minutes legtoawber 24,`1986 Oeotaer 22,1986 V. rKament Calendar - y The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They 07i be actea on by the Commission at one time without discussion. if anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. A. TIME TIXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 8486 TMI - A divisia,,iof'34.2 acres of land into 4`parcels in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6)located on the southwest corner of Raven Avenue and Arrow Route-APN 209-092-04, B. TIME EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84-37 KELBERT PARTNERSHIP --Development a a 7,500 square foot gasoline dispensing station and ancillary automotive faeilitii s on 2.W.,acres of land located'at the northeast corner of Center Avenue and Foothill. Boulevard in the General C Commercial(GC)District;-APN 1077-401-28. nr 7 C. f' DESIGN RVNIE W FOR "TRACT 13059 -. REPUBLIC ` DEVELOP NT �;,,Review of site plan and building architecture„T6 ;Tract 13059, an approved residential subdivision of 25.8 acres within the: Victoria Planned Community,(Low-Medium Residential, 4-8 dNelling'units per acre)- into 137 lots, located north of'the Southern Pacific Railroad-and east of the Deer Creek'Channel-APN,202-211- 13 ; 8. ` VI. P. earings The following items are public hearings in wh" crncerned individuals may voice their opinion of the.reiated n- `ecL PIease -wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address tt..etommission by stating your none and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per Individual for each profect r; ` D. ' ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN � . AMENDMENT 86-03A-LAING HOMES-A request to amend ,the;Land Use Elament of the General Plan from Flood > 1 Control to Low Medium Density Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre)for 40 acres of land located at the southwest e'Q corner of the extensions of Banyan and Milliken APN 201- 271-55. (Continued from September 24,1986) E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 86-15 MESSENGER/CROWN COACH - The establishment of A motor home/hus afisembly business within an existing 168,000 square foot industrial building and the i $3,000 square foot expansion of the ek.,sting building on 11.8 acres of land in the General Industrial/Rail Served District (Subarea 2), located at the 'southeast corner of Arrow Highway and Vineyard Avenue -AP14 209-12-15. (Continued from October 8,1986). DEVELOPMENT ^REVIEW 86-13 MODIFICATION - MESSENGER-TA,e equestto modify the previously approved Master Plan by;reducing the site area of Phase III from 4.4 acres to 29 acres in the General Industrial/Rail Served District (Subarea 2),located at the northeast corner of 9th Weet and Vineyard Avenue APN 209-012-16. (Continued from October 8,1986). F. TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 86-02 1' -- WESTERN PROPERTIES - A request to amend the Terra Vista Planned Community by establishing a business park overlay zone for areas designated as Office Prk,Commercial and Mixed Use, within the Planned Community boundary - APN 1077-421-06, 1077-091-17. (Continued from October 8; 1986). m, T y, G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT;-"' -tCO1Jl`y"'nNAL USE PERMIT 86:17 GTE - A.,propt f .ta locate~a._56 squ square Poot unmanned remote sviitching'station north of Highland and east of:Milliken within the Caryn Planned Community= APN 225-141-99. (Contixi�?d from October 22, 1986), I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE 86-05 - WALTON CONSTRUCTION - A request to decrease the minimum average``lot size? the minimum lot width, the minimum corner lot width, and 'minimum lot depth for a ,proposed 57 lot 'subdivision in the Very Low,,;Density Residential'District (less than two dwelling units per acre) located on the west side of Sapphire Street, south of Jennet ' Street-APN 1043-121-^u1, 02, 03; 1062-011-02,03 1062-161- K a. 01. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 10349 - WALTON CONSTRUCTION - A total residential development of 57 single fam ysf lots on 33.2 acres in the Very Low Density Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units ' per acre),located on the west side of Sapphire Street,south of Jennet Street-APN 1062461-01; 1062-011-02, 03; 1043- 121-01,02,03. ' I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT.AND TENTATIVE TRACT 5. 13318-,GORDON-A custom lot subdivision of 16 parcels on 4 5 acres of land in the Low Density Residential District(2-4 dwelling units per acre),located at the southeast corner of l, Hermosa Avenue and Manzanita Drive APN 201-181-28. J. CONDITIONAL`USE PERMIT 06-12 - WESTERN SERVICJES COMPANY - The establishment of an automobile leasing office in an existing building, with a lease space of 3750 1 square feet on 1.66 .acres of land.in the General Industrial District (Subarea 4) located at 9375 Ar 3hibald APN 210 071-47. I K. THE EXTENSION FOR AND MODIFICATION TO COND117IONAL USE PERMIT 84-34 : - CANNON CONSTRUCTION A proposal to remodel the'store front facade, additional landscaping in the parkir�¢ area, reconstruction Gf`drive appruaehes,a minor building addition, and a conceptual building pad for a proposed drive-through fast food restaurant in an emsting`Neighborhood Gommereivl shopping center on approximately 7.0 acres in ttie Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District located at the northeast corner of Carnelian and Base Line-APN 202-381- 24,26, 28 33,and'36. „ } � �; •a-�«�.,:i.. , £`^set-=^'a.,n:a _ --� sr 10 ,Y, c, f i 7. L. ENVIRONiVIYNTAL.;ASSESSMI ENT AND�TARCEL MAP 10185 -WILLIAM:1,,Y(}N COMPANY-A s4bdivision of 36 6 acres o x ' land into 2 p ^Leis in the,Victoria Planned Community z; located at the outhwest corner ot' highland Avenue and MRl ken Avenue-APN 2,927211--13. M. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP .0237 BARTON - A subdivision.of 39.9 acres of land into 14 parcels in the Generk Industrial.'District, Zvbarea 8,located 1. between Arrow Route and Jersey,Boulevar i", i"tween Utica Avenue and Vincent'Avenue-APN 209-142-15;14,34. {� N. MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 8L;�•02 BROWN--The development of a 1.8,515 squarer toot retail shopping center on 2.6 acres tf, land in the General Commercial District located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Lion Street-APN 208-632/A. i l.,r 0. ENVI)IONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DE:VEY�OPhiE:tT, DISTIICT AMENDMENT 86-07 CUCAXONGPL COUNTY WATE[,'DISTRICT A request tc:-amend the DeveloAment IAA" ,. DistraF{{t Map from 'BC1¢ (Flood Control) to "GC"L'(Gkiieral NP Com6ereial),for 1.06 acres of land located on-?he northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Son Diego Avenue(A portion of APN 207-101-43). P. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 10225 ABICA'L-PROPERTIES,INC.-A division of 4.24 acres into 2 parcels within the Industrial Park District, Subarea 6, located at the northeast Corner of 6th Street aw!,,Haven Avenue APN 203-411-15. VI.I. New 3usinesa Q. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REV'EW 86-22 KAPLAN - The development of a 38,800 square foot industrial building on 2.1 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 13) located on the east side of 6tJ Street north of Buffalo Avenue-APN 229-261-13. j R. APPEAL OF SIGN PERMIT 86-46 - BANK OF AMERICA - '' Appeal of staff denial of a Sign Permit to add &wail signs to the existing building located at 9719 Foothill Boulevard. S. F-7DPEAL OF MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86-30 -LOS ANGLES CELLULAR TELEPHONE - Locate6 at the southeast corner of 9th Street and Industrial Lane. An appeal of a condition of approval requiring undergrounding of existing overhead utilities. �i f i V Di►-xtoes Reports T. UNDERGROUNDING UTILITIES REPORT U. STATUS, OF MINIMUM -UNIT SIZE/MMIMUM ,LOT SIZE STUDY IS. Comynpsdon Business X.�,,;PubI C:o►amen d, TWs is the time and place for the,geneftil public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed hero•sare those which do not s: already appear on this agenda. N XI. Adjournment S K The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set sn 11 p.m. adjournment time.. If items go beyond that time,! shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. s .,I I it - ,M ---- - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GUCA&I, STAFF REPORT DATE: November 12, 1986 0 �? U >. 4, TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Cihvm scion 1977 ' FROM: Barry.eIR. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer, BY; Joe Stofa, Jr.,,,Associate Civil Engineer ,. SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE AR L MA LA DE LA M.AN HA L !:Div Oono 34 'ac—s of 1106, into 4,,parce It in t ae Industrial Perk 0jstri6 '(Subarea 6) located on the southwest corner of- Haven Avenue u„a Arrow Route - (A.P.N. 209-092-04) Tentative Parcel Map 8486 as shnwn on attached,Exhi6it "C" was initially approved by the`PliMing Comnisaion on December 12, 1984 for an initial two year period until December 12, 1986. 1 The applicant is now requesting the first of the possible three one-year extensions which would extend the approval period until December 12, 1987. The, letter of request (Exhibit "A") is attached for, your reference. < ' RECOMMENDATION:_ It is recommended that the Planot g Com++ission adopt the attached resolution approving a one year-time extension for Tentative Parcel Map 8486. The new expiration- date'is to be December 12, 1987. Respectfully submitted, i 1 Barrye R. Hanson Senior Civil Engineer BRH:JS•me Attachments ITEM A TEACHERS MANAGEMENT&INVESTMENT CORrORA,TION $ 3 '01111 , s:. THE TMr BUILOMG3 08 UPPER NEWPORT PLAZA,NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92660.2629 TELEPHONE(714)96"100 RoOwn W.Flupeaiek e PrsieNnt - �9�6 � i ram. and — i � chairrnn'of dsa awd Ref. F86-6573 ell,cf RAHCHC cucl�,��„' "1 ENGINEERING 4tVISIIv� ' October 7, 1986 City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 ' Rancho Cucamonga, CA 9173i,' 31,I Attention': Barbara Krall Dear Barbara i t Enclosed is our check for $62 as to our a time extension for request for k.. Tentative Parcel 'Map No. 8486, Expiration Date, i2/tZfor ,. TMI is negotiating with some Joint' vefture partners on the development of said land which wrxl require potential utilization of the Para,:;` Map. The qP lead time to Complete the project is likely to take most or all of a year, with the detailed englneering a,nd financing elements. Therefore, we ask that TMT be granted a one-year time extension. kPLUAVA truly Y im, s, 1 . BY: atrick, General Partner DE LA LTD., a California limited partnership RNF•cc J EXHIBIT"A" i ��2 inn 7 w� ski 0� p ftil�IBlHf �s�■1!■■in u r gs ��•..�r�•.�e ► ter_ r.• � n n ImIn WE �GUnN■■ — 181�lIA1 WE T 111111I1i1 Y■e■u� IWlifl� p=_ -111111111 IIIYI 11111 - MIM M (III f - Ilfll IIIWDI= N IIN11Jl15 NOW ryl IHIi11 = umw T uxuu! Ifi Hull u r� a • s` d,•,. `I t-�•�r r 1 •t • cww.w.c r r.u.wornTIL- r 1t 1 `�1 �- 1 •) au.n+.ti—�tww.a.rr...ru.c.N••r ' 1.. i1_- f°� T-yag ,arearr ucrrcr.rp tunagimu � s1aD !rf ./ � sf ..., rr.r�w...•.. er.v[y$u- ar N as ice. ? _ y� _II!cr'— ! 4 � f...• .cam _ �j TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP +495 _...».., .. TNebn°I.Paf!'fa(�rlvfaloMi CM►MIdOL I Mrnf(.WrINI. ° 4� Crrw9rw.a= ~trs Mrua r. j. yr .•rr . • vv�r .Y.......rrn... ..run r I PLli pp��� Ny�l�1�11/r V IL fHN . E�TTC�J��f�Q� G CITY OF NEM: PARCEL MAP 84° N RANCHO GU01 MONGA Tom- i �l RECOOTI NO, A, RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO C9CAMGNGA PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING THE TIME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 8486 WHEREAS; a roiquest has been filed for a time extension for the above-described project, 'pursuant to Section 1:501.8.2 of Ordinanpe 28-8, the ►. Subdivision Ordinance, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above-described tentative parcel map on December 12, 1984 SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the -following fn id'ogs: A. That current economic, ma✓;keting, and inventory a conditions make it unreasonable to build-at this time. + B. That strict enforcement of .hL conditions of approval ' regarding expirations would ;not,,be consistent- with qP the intent of the Development Code. r=' C. That there has been no significant cSManges to the character of the area in which the project is located that would cause the project to become conf/_liming or inconsistent with current standards. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a' time extensioor: Parcel Mt.k Applicant Expiration 8486 Plaza Delta Mancha, Ltd. December 12, 190 t a 1 ' APPROVED AND,ADUPTED THIS 12th PAY OF NOVEMBER, 1986. PLANNING CDMIISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy ecre ary - - 1 a_q r, Brad `Duller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga-, do -nereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was. duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at,,a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th 4ay,.of November. 1986, by the following vote-to-wit- AYES-. CO(IMISSIONERSt NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ,s 1 3 — -�--1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �ucgMa , STAFF REPORT ti y FI 2 U r,> DATE: November 12, 1986 1977 TO. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission V FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Chris Westman, Assistant Planer SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84-37 KELBERT Developmento a square footcar wash, gasp ine dispensing station and';,ancii'lary automotive facilities on 2.6 acres of land located at the northeast corner of Center Avenue and Foothill Boulevard in the General Commercial (GC) Development District - APR: : 1077 401-28 I. BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting a one (1) year time extension r Conditional Use Permit 84-37 as described above. The project was originally approved by the,.. Planning Commission on January 9, 1985 and currently'expires on Jdwary 9, 1987 IL. ANALYSIS: Conditional Use'"''remit 84-37 as approved with conditions comp; ies with all current standards of the Development Code. WorKing drawings have been submitted through the Building Divis*ran for plan check and certain design issues are being referred back to Design Review Committee for review and approval before issuance of Building Permits. III. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission grant ti—fe extension for one (1) year until January 9, 1988. Restfully s itted, B l e; City Planner i BB:CW:vc 'I Attachments: Letter from Applicant Requesting Time Extension Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - site Plan Exhibit "C - Grading Plan Exhibit "D" - Elevations Time Extension Resolution of Approval ITEM B t 10 sk 1101 E. FOOTHILL BLVD„ UPLA, D, CA. 91786 714-381-8791 tl Octoba-0 17, 1986 , Iity of Rancho Cucamong' Planning Division 9340 Baseline Road P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 730 RE: Project File No. CUO 84-37 u Please accept this letter-as .a request for an extension on the above project. Due to litigation, :his project has been delayed, Wit plans are now before your city for approval. Please find enclosed the extension, fee of $62.00. If you need any more informatimn please contact me. Respectfully, r if m Kel ber�+. Kelbert - A Partnership F GC E , r OP VD3, ® Facture- City P► Hall FC I G c r" V CC ITY OF RAN -Io C�'CA'` I1C),'\TG TITLE: d��ToiL1 ,ryf119100= PLANNIN113 DIVISIO.N R W I tt III3IT: A SCALE- -. Jyj' it 14 p JQ \�A} .. A 0 kind IT lip a �3 t �.r' �1\ '•\tip �` .,,� ��r. ' • .� aIVA, a III .�- • • `m i aF I t =�)) t •�•t.; �• � a �r i . � a� f'•/F �a � ' j, I F � ` �' Qt, =4. L F.yt f �� Fi^i� y3 ro Fj�� s1,f`8P,a9 _� T �' .,dz 1 � .. ! Fs � � � t �'� r 4��� � r' �� �� � { —i n�� .� �s;T a0 ' � p � ��, (� c j i of i 1 —► -,,,��r , , ' �: �, tt � , �n� ''4i11 � YAP 7� (� r�'"(�;'+T+141� {Z F fi`, 5 '�' F �'.�,, � '4 I = { � `+ �i i, �.. .�r �'i i�r, C }� 'W a y, w ?JIM`' .: ,�{ fz�. j�F i r,, � ti •� T tom-, '�.;3., .* 3 1L� q� tr •., y at t■ s � � t��� � _ .�. �`- �;.,:��. ac r`Lehr.,'. } �w 1��; {s �j1 .,,yiiw�y {,r. '�,)Gp I ,`,*� tip '.5:. �.yl .� ti"� l Fy 4 N'N' . ���'� �F r r RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONaA PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING THE. TIME EXTENSION FOR%CUP 84-37 WHEREAS, a 'request tias„ been filed for a tin,a ,extension for the it above-described project., Pursuant"'to Section 17.02.100 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above-described CUP 84-37 on January 9, 1985 SECTION 1:' ' The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the followine Mn`gss A. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a distressed market• climate for development of the project, F U� That current 'economic, marketing, and inventory .- conditions make it, unreasorabla to develop the • project at tMs time. i C. That strt.^.t enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations wagla not be consistent with the intent of,the Development Code. D. That the granting of said time extension will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to_properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTICH 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Camission hereby grants a time extens`i'orifo`rc Project Applicant+ Expiration CUP 84-37 filbert Partnership January 9, 1988 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY DE NOVEMBER, 1966. r PLANNING -'01 MISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA14ONGA BY* Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary i 6- 7 C Ho)embeV 12, 1986 Pa r' 2 JJ I, Brad,.BulIer, Deputy, Secritary .of the'Planning Comissinn of the City y r Rancho Cucamohga, &hereby..certify,that the foregoing Resolution was-duly and {; "regularly introduced :gassed, and adopted bX the Planning,CO�ission of A ed City of Rancho Cucamor+ga, at a regular meetir of the PTanning ;Comniss3,on on the 12th day o¢ Wviiiber, 1986, by the=follo ing vote-te.-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS (i ;f NOES: COMMISSIONERS: 11 ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Al N >i k as CITY OF RANCHO CUCAI ONGA Gucwmro STAFF REPOtiT f r _ o F Z,. : > DATE: N!�vember 12, 1986 19777 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Bruce Cook, Associate Planner SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 13059 - REPUBLIC DEVELOPMENT Review of site- pan ana Building architecture for TFact 1305:, an approved residential subdivision of 26.8 acres within the Victoria Planned Community (Low-Medium Residential, 4-8 dwelling units per acre) into 137 lots, located north of the Southern Pacific Railroad and east of E the Deer Creek Channel - APR 202-211-13, 38. r I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Review of site plan and building architecture for a previously approved residential subdivision. it II. ANALYSIS: A. General: Tentative Tract 13059 was approved by the Planning ommiss on on May 14, 1386. At that time, the Commission approved only the subdivision design and the conceptual grading plan, with the requirement that any future plans for unit development of 'five or more residential units would be submitted as a Design Review for review and consideration by the Planning Commission. The Tentative Tract was processed by the William Lyon Company who has since sold this tract to Republic Development, the current project applicant. The proposed bui Wng architecture consists of four different house plans, all two-story, each with a variety of elevations employing use of eitner'stucco or hardboard wood siding. Each house plan is offerred ►pith either a 2-car, 2 1/2-car, or 3-car garage. The proposed unit mix is summarized on the attached ite ?lan (see Exhibit °D"). B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee reviewed this request attieir meeting of October 16, 1966 and has recommended its approval subject to the following requirements: 1. All lots with 3-car garages should use standard 2-car drive approach (W = 16') and then flare driveway out to a 3-ctr width on private property. ITEM G PLANNINO•COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tract 1:059 - Republic Development November 12, 1986 ,F Page 2 2. Generally, front yard setbacks should be increased to a minimum of 20' (measured from back of sidewalk),' and only be permitted to be lessened to 18' on lots where it is necessary to accoi-nodate minimum rear yard requirements. 3. On Lots 108 and 109, houses should be plotted so that RV storage is on the interior side of stile lot. 4. Window uprade treatments should be provided on side and rear elevations to promote quality architecture on all elev;stions. 5. On garage 'aide elevations visible to the public, exterior siding material used on the front elevation should be extended on the side elevation to the return fencing. All of these items have either been incorporated into revised plans or have been.'.ncluded as Conditions of Approval of the attached Resol utiarr. C. RV P__arking The Victoria Cb4unity Plan requires that RV ppa—rljng— e�pravidQd for 25% of,all lots within all "C', %-M", and "M" land-use designations. -Based on this standard of the CommunityPlan, this tract of 137 lots would be required to q provide 34 lots equipped for kV storage. A lot is considered to have met the requirements for on-site RV storage if there is a minimum 10-foot unobstructed side yard or, the garage side of the house, and the return fencif.d is provided with a double- sided, double-swinging gate. The submittedplans do conform to these Community Plan requirements for RV parking. D. Lot-Line Adjustment: At the time of Tentative Tract approval, no dwelling units were proposed in conjunctior, with the subdivision design. Republic Development is unable to get their current housing program to fit on all the lots with the present subdivision design. Therefore, as -a part of this application package, they have included a� p g , . proposed series of lot-line adjustments for the purpose of relocating certain property lines to accommodate their housing program so that all minimum setbacks can be satisfied. Staff's review has indicated that with the adjusted lot lines, all lots would still be in conformance with development standards as stipulated in the Victoria Community Plan. If the Commission has no objection to the proposed lot line adjustments, and sees no further review of this item as being necessary, then the Commission can determine that the Tract Map, as adjusted, is substantially in conformance with the design of the original Tentative Tract Map, and no further action is necessary. �a PLA00ING COW1-fiSI.,0U`STAFF REPORT Tract 13059 - Republic Development Novemher 1%, 1986 r J Page $ F �* III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order for the planning Commission 'to cansi er approval, the following Findings must be made. )k 1. That this project is consistent with the Development Code, the Victoria Conaounity Plan, and tide General .Plan; f 2. That this project will not be detrimental to_ adjacent properties, or cause significant environmental impacts; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Development Code, the Victoria Community Pl7n, and City Standards. IV. RECOMMENDATION-. Staff reco6ends that- the Planning Commission approve s request. If the Planning Commission concurs wath the Facts for Ffndings, adoption of the attached Resolution would be in order. ReX ully sud, ,. ` Brad Buller City Planner' r BB:BCzns Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location trap Exhibit "B" - Area Development Plan Exhibit"'C" - Tentative Tract Map/Grading Plan (Approved); Exhibit "D" - Prbposed Site Plan Exhibit "E" - Proposed Landscape Plan k Exhibit "F" - Lot Line Adjustmenrs Plan Exhibit "G" Building Architecture E Resolution No.-86-54 Resolution No. 86-107 Resolution of Approval with Conditions - - '' S••'YCttIM 3H; t` -� 53NS1 3HS ,:(,{ ��:wi ..jt1 r✓ 4 7 � ;fr all � b 5p i is w � a Fp 3 Um — t t dig ( � of (� Z. till I Ul i � 1 4 Ci ds I�1 W c Jm xy- W uj ill W W is OVA ' a O apt CITY OF ; RANCHO C[,'CA IO: G� irEND-�;-- PLA-NNI,\G CIIE'ISION EXHIBIT:4�5G1LE- --- Z . �a• F, ids '�¢7,—f�, •r•ri�e� Ho..�Tv ' �f y••,�'y AVPM •. sal '...-- .. e! . r • 't 3 — _�y��Ap E n•c Z`' , ANCHO c=M..... CdultdCMiTY PAR( i TENTATWE TRACT Na 13059 TENTATNE TRACT CRY OF RANCHO CUCAMOMOA 8OUNDARY NOVEMBER 18,vm E BOO'PERNETER ZONE SITE UTILIZATION MAP � a VICTORIA THE tlIW9VLYOA COMPANY INC. d,MuOwRSwOveH.S..UwGmr CfR.rO�rnU.P eta APQGD WM aRAM>0 arMOCA,CXFDWM r PLANNIh,�G DWZSIC i EXHIBIT: +"Z SCA LEA • AREA DEVE. OPMENT PLAN _ VICTORIA VET ' Rancho Cucamonga,Ca wv:.�..�.;.. eaD.fm®Cn. `. c(t'�. _ wgNNa ayFtit If CY NraRs!% M11t7/Ne�CxOtrr as-�*-•+••• Ems LAND U5�'LtGENO AN ' 'V .r tJNtTUNITtABt A710N D 1'4'' z•• 'T' .x VUAM arts E 1 LRA<emraw HI ••, 1 �(w°tea'"^ iru K '�r,4 r r �C'..,, x., (J �Tr •: sit _tata tOM'u�tN�p}4 7T.0.1K // w4 lors �9 aivnv �rm,0 1" sr M LCn IWAC i' SEP Zs LOTS :� Y! lecnr.oaroo+ny t M r:� �!,l ion f•�� _ U 01YK ffMl .a.= .s _ i`:.od^• .\ PHASt It CTS TVMtf 1777E AG ! w tots �P-H--A•TSE ryw ti n..��ceurc /� W yr- V, a art +7®tu��ry 3 i• '..t ,ti t e� '��q�'� � 16R � -R�' i ?', •> +�maormsanatms. Iwoowm►w.tc+,c l�.• :3� �� v,' ce►K .I'y, 1! care ' +t uca.a-a '+_:• j/ =/�, ♦ "\i � ait i•i;2 im x;=,..ar��: ,��f _ {/ 7`{yt �- �eyJ } j �ly,� �.i i `���- M'4�J: \4s ,•' r t ��µ��_ L Mm rTr • / j r ' Yi t x''w�i. -_t y, I�4Y•Z4."[ 1� Mt �'a �r:- /J i �s 2 n i'•7t i tk , \`\ it^`-'/�.:' � u it� �4 ., a„ .•�"4� � . � 1q . /f/�t_ }• � !r t�"� a }��h\^Y,f�fwF! :i i l'\ , _:<"1r �i :.l�.. to CITY Or. of vx�z RANCHO O Cj:C,�', fi�r�ir� ITEM TITLE: PLANNING Ds'trLSIC?tt - F. iiirIrt !s L scAz --------`. - C141,— uro�r�avutiJ Ai OA' —I M Al WVi'J71A1•�` {��NI/(��ssyyIA TSOA1 SM VIHV.L4 °'• ••• •• 6SOC&'ON 7.OVaL SALLVIM1 t.[J• 1 IF _ } F[f ti !c br f7 1 E •t tip, � J��i �q}q ' .��,,• ;i-i ,.y 7,Jllt f� f f J.•: axg�it !� t 57 j of�$R i J # F� ✓t too fig�'r `� `c � ' \ •� \�.' ��•. LU f [ d- 7 f .•'; yip � �,-t 1�^ s_h �¢' i � e , I a fLit aa:i,._i.? —•,rdh a• t}t }� '�i i f� fir.,• =1s� 2 At fC��'.• `� a+-�a./,..-�'—�_.�_._f:.— ..Syr 'sl.r. ' ,,,7C f JCS-.• 1 -N xt�'i}F...�! �J ;�,k ., d� ��t >t W_ r 5 3 fl f � � zfr 4ic A Ile ''iiaa I ��I� £` � � �i, t "7 �i, .>v 'r i�2,Y• �7� fir. t ' • •av �� a�„� i;...7�4 tt as i` .. � Vey i 5 1 � Al I filf 111 l / l 3 ur dm ear � it y�•'!'r wig-/ �' �l'�i -�- rs_--' li —®a7 F C - 1� i i \t - of •+ - ^"' :'� � F'. t �-:' � ;,,,�_ Y = ,J •• may, �� �,:s� - _ W--14 SIB bj 91 IL 43 s -. .d n r.� • � �R Y.-__.. x 1. 711 it` 7 OIL ea Try `a�►. " AIN Iv a .t. .p i• o: L:j Fw � _moo t`` t � :Y i� iqt - r�•�� �' 14 3 �s -• �, _oss'"`'�3=-rf_� _ 'r._.../ k. �� ti�.i �c :�a. .` r t t Y •a .�—. ,.� ,may �"� 1„ CC., t 1. { }r i to As •(= t 1 I,At r alai S Tia f S Lw 1J•�,� - �31 rs f9 �- � a�Y7. At 9 i� • mot ' i �y�a r� -� 7 7i �,. .'. y 7 a '.. .d Y , L ►its L u P4 ----gin 4 V #i. gR % b JA 7 ML r` 7 LWI i 3 1 �'� i R� .+• c* � � � .Jt� Sfi �ii F7� �'% l,�) 1 j i 1� � )�� i� I 1. �• li (�- /I � ,/ f 111 � f v' niff IRK ��i •T-. i'=aa4.yi��. ylth�Y ® Mis® '.r1+t i C r t �v . _.___ ►air �j �j� +�11 ltt Mt� t �. 4 , 1p d NNW �- . € a ' U t r V � Q cU ;, U 1 � t r I�lijll �`��'muuurt `' /�o191lI��j� nlilr„ r_ u,e �� I�I��il 1��]��II �r��, � ,�_ a,�46j O�jj ■1. I j�{M9) li'jj �t .w 1 F jlljr 21l � 1 I� f 1 1 1 • �. .�l��ll h ,rrr�,;� _ tl. Li r � • Qr r ■ I Q Q � O Z sml� MR w i� - '{ L r i _! n e [ jjfti . I � i x.. V'. r ANWA zi -Alls a -g• at"aa� s U ram' a b . � , W 1 ,• c3i J _^ _4• � yam... '• y� y u - V i 111R x. rr '* 111 #t! at�ttl�E RIR ,v n r➢ �� 1 �pYR Niijr -21 9 � /s [11SI --�1 .`„ CAI , n O J ill t�l, at ' Is rs #t sa 'mot� t eFir Lit 113 Q 0 • 11���ll�i as Ij 1 I y+ o` 944,Al �. n Ems° IN Ig eat ♦ QQHQQ� �.. is � iijiei kkuu��r®� fsl fn��-1 unto �I �r n Y1 -II�f a IB°riels " r�sl4:. 1 1 1 iam Qa EE �:�A7 if l �.t lip frl�q�f�� 71 ■ �`, �y Y�. M ' Q J CL It. n I'll-if t Q • Loop :1I Q Q_ � MOtt.. � I(® iM M n ®®s t I t ti nuu_ s aTx j.1 �o� • 40 • I_L1 _. J i t � al 3 -31 J ] f »1.U �'•;naasri. 1 �'r�-� §J��t' �! As h ■ d NR 6Y,a atm { arm ti .111 ill-fill fpt is �1-liata . i n I� �1 x. .�" " ' 'w-: '3 _. _ r� .,..r �� ion® � � ...,� n '� ± E �S �" ".�y t1 ✓L' K"��•NP{+�. t p'iA�M ai J®•� f,t�: ! ,0 ar T'r ��� F _ Y y,�-r-. � r � � .—�t_�_� '`+ Yet, �� ��= _� � s �! t d- Q � �ty�� .-�+�-r rrnLtit.. _ � ���� �b �� a � �� n J >�. �" r �m �I.�r '� � � � �� 0 " �R: U ■, ,� � i _ �s � �� � A �-3 .:a ��� ... .�. ,... �!(� ��` y it RESOLUTION NO. 86-54 %J �A SOLtS U4 OF "THE PLANNING COMI5SION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO _CU�ADIONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPRpVING TENTATIVE TR�CC7 t+RP tt0. 13059 y u WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 13059 h, einafter "Map" submitted �. by The William Lyon Company,-applicant, for th purpose of subdividi.ngvtthe real ,property situated in t'je City of Ranch Cucamonga,� County of ,,San Bernardino, State of California, described as ^ciJB acres within the Victioria:� Planned Community,, (W: Medium .Res;dential, 4 dwelling units per acre), v ` located north of the,Southern Pdcific Railro jA an&east, or the. Deer Creek Channel (APN: 207-211-13, 38) into 137 lq�i, regularly"came before the PIanninn Commission`for pu'bli "' wring. and action on flay 14; 1986; and WHEREAS,-the City Planner has recommended approval of tye Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineiring and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has Pead and considered that Engineering„and Planning Division's reports and 1'k s considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Cotrni5sion"'•of the City 'tf Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows; SECTION 1: The Planning Commission--makes th`� foliowingl:,mO ill sin regard to en "eve Tract Ne. 13069 and the Ma*p thereoi\,� 1 (a) The tentative tract is consistent with ttN General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans,, \\ 1' M The design or improvements of the tentative t wt is consistent with the General Plan, Development'Code, and specific plans; (e) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of.the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury ao humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) #The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public hearth problems; PLANT N COMMIS! 4 AWpTION May 14, 1986 TT 13059 - The,WilIiaf'-L� Page 2 {f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflfict with any;easement acquired by the public at large, ! now of record; for access through or use of the property within the proposed sublvision. (9) That this P'° oject will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map, No.- 13Q59, a cci of which is attached erS hereby approved subject to all of the follow 'conditions and the attached Standard Conditions, Planning Division �. 1. Prior to recordation of Tract 13059, all conditions of approval applicable to aTMd imposed upon Tentative f Tract 13022,shall be c9mplied with, including. but y I not limited to, the completion of 'Off-site improve me AdditiLgally, the greenbelt trail areas as veil as Groves Park improvements, s� ii be completed prior to the^occupancy of the first unit within this tract. , ) 2. Prior to recordation of Tract 13059, the ,Final Map " for Tract 1:3022 shall be recorded. 3. The greenbelt trail located along the northerly bound:icy shall be indicated on the final map as " Lot P of Tract 13058. y 4. This neap is being appro;�ed as a Tract Subdivision only. Any futur? Prop?npls for t e eve,5pffe o five or more residenti' ;units shall M equlre Design Review, anQ approval ,,�ior to the issuance of building permits for any units. S. Concurrent with any application for Design Review, the. applicant sisal] also submit an acoustical study detailing what mi ligation measures, if any, are regdred to achieve noise levels,. both exterior And interior, consistent with G'`,, Standards for Tots abutting eitiher Milliken `A r;iue or the railroad right-of-way, e-3S" PLANNING CORMISS! RESOLUTION May id, 1985 'rT 13059 w The Yt ;tiam Lyon Co. Page 3 6. Landscape treatments at the end of side-on cul-de-sacs shall b% Designed to proyfde an open view inta w"e t"erior of the cul-de-sac. Design treatment sft't. include the use of decorative wrought iron fencing and sidewalk connections from the sidewalk to the perimeter street. 7. A six foot high masonry wall shall be provided alone the southerly tract Foundary adjacent to thf: railroad right-of-way consistent with the approved wall design for Highland Avenue. These walls shou,d be staggered and offset to increase visisal Interest. Tree well insets per the approved conceptual landscape design for the slope pla-ating along the southerly tract perimeter are tr be provided. Landscape maii1enance easements will be required where perimeter ells encroach into prfwate property and are to be t,edicated on the Final lap. Final plotting of all walls and locations of all landscape easements are to be determined prior to recordation of the final map. 8. F3-: tot high decorative fer«es will be required along street side lot lines for all lots that either side-on or rear-on to Victoria Groves Loop Road, In rear-on conditions walls will be of masonry block construction. In situations where street grade is below pad grade resulting in d sloped parkway, fence lines are to be coincident with. Lhe ton of slope. Landscape maintenance easements will,-.Le required where fences.�:ncroach onto private-lots and are to be dedicated em the Final Map. Final plotting of r all fences and locations of all easements are to be determined prior to recordation of the Final Map. 9. The slope along the southerly perimeter of the tract is to be landscaped consistent with the approveO conceptual design employing a decorative ground cover planting on the slopft bank, shrub massing, trees and a continuous windrow planting with intermittant nodes of accent trees at the top of E -lope. Windrow trees on property side of wall to be irrigated by a separate irrigation system, to be maintained by that property owner for each individual lot. Accent trees and slope planting on slope side of wall to be on an irrigation sy.tty i for maintenance by the City. Block wall is to he of =lire design as that approved for Highland Avenue. Construction landscape: and irrigation plans _spa P!,ANh "COMh12SS " O OlUTIOtd , May 14i lg$5 TT 13059 - The Pulliam Lyon Co. Page 4 detailing 'the final: design of the slope landscape . treathent shall be submitted for the review and approval of the City Planner prior to the issuance of any grading .p4rmits., ..Full slope improvements including walls, Tandscap4i and irrigation shall be installed, prior to occupancy of the first unit ,. .. within thus tract. 10 , Any retaining walls +used, router than those at the tract p,arimeter adjacent to the Deer Creek Channel, are,+to be a maximum of 41 high. A six foot high { �►sonry screen wall, shall be provided along ,ncc_ Vesterly tract perimeter::adjacent to the Deer Creek Channel, <� 11. All retaining walls �sible to the general public, i.e. on the streetside of corner side yards and ►ithin the front yard,, are to be constructed of a oecorativ� 'riterial to the satisfaciton of the City Planner. 12. All back of Tot grad; differentials are to be a maximum of 121, Aft �' Eli eerin Di.soon " 1. Vittoria Groves: loop .Road shall bs fonstructed full width to Hi:ghlend Avenue with the first phase of decelrf>it. Sidewalk--':and parkway landscaping miy be di&4-red until adjacent parcels are developed. 2. -fi.a. entire' width of Victoria; Park lane shall be constructW,"from the loop Road to Milliken Avenue wj ti the first phase of development, 3. Milliken Avenue shall be constructed as follows with the first phase of development: A. Portioe, from Victoria Park Inane to Southern Pacific Railroad, '1) Full i,aprovenaents for west roadbed, Y (2) Full median with only one opening at the loop Road, and (3) A-'minimum 181 wide pavement for the east r roadbed. PANNING COMMISST RESOLUVSCAN May 14, E986 TT 13059 The William`Ngurc:Ca. Page 5 � 1 B. Portion from- Southern Pacific Rail,,oad to ^in e Road: 1) Full Wian y (2) A minimum id' wide pavement on both sides i of the m '-an, - (3) Drainage control devices��, such.. as paved ditckes, AC berms .or 'curios shall E^ installed , as apprdva4 by the C1ter Engineer.` C. R;i'lroad Crossin$t: (I) Construct full, improvements for both_.•; roadbeds including• medians (except- parkwa,%'sidewalks,and landscaping) for at Least 200' cn•both sides of the railroad. 2) The level open steal' coo-di nate +.ef th the City to have the railroad_crossing signal and arms installed prior to occupancy to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 1 0. The cast of the .permanent iraprovemeat5 in cxc*ss )Of the standard one half street improvements adjacent to the tract boundary ; Shall be sub3ect to reiae5ursement from the City � for the ,tdJacoat ;.,property owners upon . development,gf their roperty. 4. Storm drain .i_ :ments as required for cro , Iot drainage shall `3 dedicated vv the final map. 5. The storm drain master plan fx. the area shall be completed and approved prior to recordation. of the Final Map . 6._ Construct saffftiew•°..�orm drain facilities to serve each phase of deVe1 opnent as`required by the City Engineer. The facilities shall a designed to ` contaia Q1OO within the street or easement right-of-ray. F � ~PLANNPW�CflMSS" RESOLUTION May 14, TT 1305 i- Ue William Lyon Co, 4 ' - Page 6 s d 7.:, I'SOU66i'n Pacific Railroadk Slope Ft inten'aace: A? `tk e- , appl."cant �ihall Obtain from Southern Pacific Rail Mond a signed licens0/agreement on behalf of the City -I Ranck-Cucamonga, for ' plaativi and - ainten�ktce of the slope easement on the,railtoad property- Appltrant shall be responsible for maintenance of lope planting { a'nd ' irrigation systems unt;S Such, a license/agreement can, be obtained...-. K The appiicint shal" provid6z,Aeouate vehicular , a access;,�to the railroad slope`maintenance area to the satisfact;on of the City Engineer prior to recordation of-"the map. r APPROVED AND,ADEPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF'MAY, 1986. " PLAN =. OMMISSIOtt OF T"r/i i;ITY/OF,RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY. enn s u7t.Thairman f` ra u ;al.. epu` 'secr�ary I, 'Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning ComAissien of the City of x. Rancho Cucawnga, do hereby certify that tie foregoing Resolution was duly and rerzilarly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission.'of the City of Rancho Cucaixny a,,It a regular meetioC, of the P°l: em Ining Coissfon held .� F14 14tt =day of they, 19M, by the, following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMMIONERS: REMPEL, CHITIEA, BARKER, STOU; NOES COWISSIONERS; r'ONE A6,.M. tOMISS ONERS: MCNIEL w - ,l 3 V�rVO V I` O C L A C^L C� [C CC V=•�I�IY. . �I G�>YY Y w4w� C �CL OLOE r.Y qi OHO o $ o c au Ynu c c n0 401.r0 T7= C'O L 6L GVu6 q0 OtL�fF`56 rL^ _ t !Y Y 0 C Y ✓V u 4 0. Y V � ,^Y O . t'n n4 Rh US $ e, Ct O 4R Y _•^a L wiS,apa q:� `«.'to a = aYwA u ♦,$+^. on43.Yrr na.� ». e.y rq •t4i Z COG co•.YC+u NZ0. dL�10■9r OOG C y �wO G Mpa •.'L 4A.V L� 4y YM 4W4 Y P `VAs4 q,..L LO n�.tle w._A� Yww ac. Yy N S w b a r C. Y C p C{�=■C O Y J G C G g A C M NL®yVCi+ • Ov ♦ Y Y�O O raA. 9K■R�IN G+� L 4 O>��b Ord c 4y 00. 3EY�G Vd Y9 cNr Yy. C w r 4 Y 5 0♦♦ ry r �s •iw.�L' 'jF ..gi ow�m �s n�au � w e Low gtoT - �t ACk n �a Y u.+e c Y 8 'uo u • � O ��hypyq~yw � n V � ♦` 4 V 1� b O w (� Ell n mG w � qo n r wq 21 Y FO o O Y pO V Tc y Z S: �• � R .� O}�E 4 V N / ' • N � Y1 FCr G�(�r � LnLa 3 c.N C L G G ! K M t u qY CYPRaa Q.y C. Y+UTrb VO YY • iaw �.:, <^16 AA V0 ON U r GL > �L LV AO pd O� fir,• ��� H n:4 sN L y'nN u n �O O O n s 4 it Y L 0 C�� .b b M^ O •Y � N b AC°C 20�0 0�',04.YU AC. E p O:i> p wO �q EE • L 1. t 7..• CO+a G C YLC^On n Ly�'.?.N CuY 'O.. O «7;Yb Yq y,J spN� y•TiuL L ^^ �.M n•+.C. rz YUO L. OIxsV Y +N,.�N`ti. 2ttis �'� by •Cu N u!. Ql �>L Coco' ��Nwu c: $+`o` - « �b rdn �pn. r: cN vv^.. au-^.. •.L Lc. uY�` ter` _ �oG� �� u�uw. ea��/«y{. aegNw = uZE E= g � . +�� b�0•C V o'o GY .:per w 00 u w.=dJ; n Y,,,c bC•ni L w.j L.^NwN batLwO '� bA w•b..' wY„ ` _ c� Si... a« C' O 3 Q T N 9 0� •b.� nL Y N Y '�`COD a9� �,' o+uc m^.. o u.'•9 W H Y C• wl } -ez a o E .o.' .v� _ V o 1st06Y #9CH aL21 a>Y.` GI V.v.a YQ t. OCC `'�w Nt^.5. b N @nY .-: Wes" 1^ V ` E 6 E.�d TO• ¢vni ud� 2iMvu GY 2rd=>Yr=o. w.c-.^D: �F.:« 1GC GL6 r�iCY Yi•. Q.A. 9 va •Yaw.b . Y�Y« 9 i Y^ •To c.. C." H a� i. o 11Q+ C wYd I 4'� C• Y O9 L �� �N ,Zu h �C.On C'�•.. Y: y 7 Oy 9L II O b G y E TI L G �O L p V Lp Y C yG u C bC C O fN`u u Y 4,L� ��o �a a�. c�o.'i�i c.Yo N^ •.0 ' Yc I • Nd b b y G 014� ^C .O Y L 9 Y b C 6 O«V G S L.T w Y V ^d L pL fy n^ y3.CY l,�` 4.q � �0 pY7N':'lO� U`C p�O O Qr o" v•• �,'" Fp€ anw T W+o 0o L x..,• Z.- 1 � xV:r_ Q.s CnPO T6L± v`>>oN- vS LtV N.N «+. a ->dP G•= � •vn GL wA =a c � Y:tY i«C `U= pil ` •Cj G PN b PuG� O� Vn VF 60 .pV y0'r OS u41 p bANH S o L 4b •.N9 y VP� Y OGQ C.Ob CCO bb. bj GS^.F �p 00 Q^n� QY C Hbw ` OY:. J p.b �w Ol nP C T•Ob b6EE Y L 9A �TO `H �V4 A ` OW p V.Y Wnp C� QN Frn -hn �'L NC4 4^..v:4 Nfa+ IL' .Oi�O�C¢L1 EQ M.VGb _ �TOlqw --41r ' .�C 4•`Y• 2X n• r•y L q Y u C F�aYY i 0,N {. +'n" b Q` a�i o o'y a v c L' c Y ay c c Loi v t p p +..C y y� V yN '....rb Ly pOwYu�i CCL C b 4.Ob0 LE•"N ':..9Y1 G^ CN ya �y/p t+.UNN A Oct APu� Nb b Ly >p�Yu L N O e .aN L V40 Z t E O + • t S y U M u b L.�•+ + C y. cY a hti '�� yc ((jj^^ ^,N^a. eY�w-« Gw'•' 6 U G �N `ow !�' �. ► 'Yv' c.M Q'ut'm Yza N.�. 'E a .L.e�. :. p /�Nb 00 b •� Pby 9pK $mow p�� `6q O You aAc-N• c ` L- Y C Q Q_ C L + L k L ' n oeoQ. L a•� to Vic. va' ,I .�.a coo.N C P.V�L b' u p•n N.+o G)q YG ^L.Le L Ii `G� O. qu PUOwG a O I LI Lb N. 6N Yw ONu C P 1_�GGY b ' 6u�y u6N M1yyy NA+ _GVYI� YPCLpb'aq..du4CLg� .C`Of1L• 9YLO. yIy�� IY ^�L wL O1, +M1 pa Na 04� 01=N V2 VO �yL PY.Pp_IS w y.6 u.Y ww�„I �N GO. d f.Zl•�+• PVC ` Gq.w C !� Vw L .`v Y� ``b y` S�Nyt n O`}. p` •- OUM .� ! �C. 6`6. L n0• O La wYA �+AO U OL^EO4 yNVa aor`oQ g �'pvp +'. .� Go ✓ cyo.. LC 6P �V! Yu d� ➢� ON Y Cn ZM.O N RCN Y..•. b y C `.Y b.Oo� -Paa•s.N Q,O..<.E>r CG 4 V W 4wGN Y^j Y �.O C q.6 0 C G G O•=g �L C C t d =i AQC Op u in Can ^.'. C_qr nN^ ^O bw.� O rE UGay. 6.a 0-. . U'S Yas aY u'c.�• Fb U•;�. `a • ' q`C �. 'ue O A6C `... LO• Yyb L9V + 'op '� L> > a c d a qbY b.4 ea N.�"C•.a..9 tj C C� Neagt— qO..Ci S n�d y0 v TC p LN VL Y`. GA O Opp. 'V b � w� A L b ✓L u O b '..� � C O r 0 L= c U O C b Y E It Y WV w qb�' w CC Vqw � +L .pp pC CCt 9>J. b�06 N c N Nxi yCC r0 b N w C c00 nZL Pq L 'G�•L OM Vb O �C' Y+b N Cam• Y N LUV �.L G C C d L A 4. O L = b N r C O C q C �U c Q:•NO K�. Vyp v. � O A.�.� Qq ayLSU yb a.Y w.R ? tbN h'GN GLl ib �ON'�w COR = 4�q( L Y�4 b�O i :�yC14 C OtlCC P— U� YL O C O 2 • G w t Y N 4 f CC O Y a u- Vg ra W46 C.w. p -Y.��j W Yd C ✓K •/ fib- {aYC Y'•.-Wa p -� I! B y� ly g.UE •'V p�•. P� 3Ua ..• �C Y V V GO.4+6 4 B Y P ��G b� • C V u�t41 � `v t 0 bit y.OL `RX` 9C A.gA 0` =HInWc �w•aU ~41 �. Z ("� '+a 0. 0�0� • .C�� 1� u6.Uy Lr Y�6 `SUN — PV ocq_yM s.. a �A p A, ®p% Y A y J C o P Y L• BEY �.7W .,a o ^per .s;Y Su=Y� •ceibo- eW. .. Ve�O'a o�gyf ye,g . Ly P 1--.18 fz- �4 — 4ujiC. C.aWeawtt roL UCA o H4�i.M ;;e .�.{� vMM..n.� L V WSVu... Q0q U. UY 4Uw , 6z0 LCAO� -U•.�L�� H_HY ba ,, dV 9 ONO �yC 7 9V..9 1�i O $:►WNO 1�Mn O 9ppUUI b a�Y iJ `C p6Y1� b i _ w t'VYI6 `Sad�N L--N.•rb Vl. y 6Y�Y • e I O1H�Y Y Y tIc PPM Ulq V ? `C Lw 9..C �`a 't{4 M—.a U yq `� Z,t NAO f L WH w.'y i a,^ •-a. ab za ` g C pa CC .. •. C V 4 S A Oit wH. Ta a�E _ 'YS� .H. 'oi s b a aCCw v rd YYy. H pn, ., '« O Cru ,Z&I J q9 Ud. @p9 A..yG Ap CC a°P'c 6 O u 2 p Y90= DYL Cy O 3. Nvn 1Y n�0 • w a4 cm Y96 ' F U b�C rpi C `.4 c•�asn UC 4.. �¢.�� Sa O U P9 `.CLEU. 1 NCvq C'. O tGCY �Y M•j.0 Ow� a j... Y yNS! KpyN =� �S•4 Nam, 6 gN �e.y� Tr0 6 U'D C H•"�N 9 v C Pa��w ..G. ��C G MiE �CCa �� HM.�. ,�.i O. `P c iN u .e tiA aa« 4 N ' P u,p^Y~. u o ca�� QQ o Y CPC.:i bV �C4 Y9 O�EW L46.Y- r-..•a —bg=. •[ •L-a«ay '� boon 6qm aY H-- wuc. WET abaU.r �i 14 4 N OUw N�Oi bp' 41�-W F" F& V YAK^. CN A 9 {{I{{ ;J d.� YUG 69 wYJ � � T ci d •'i pN:q� 'Op C .o. a "1. •rL. C CZ L c 3 y C¢A.,., ��... Z qY VE CN CV GGyyV 01Y �� �. O.ze bs7O,._ WiV ' •/� i" V..L�Y^q. 6A�' �� 44Q L Q. pva �6� CA O e ECEG @@ yy -22 IN ' VMM w UTyNjy bu �..a p' Vy ,� � EEdwC a.�iy CYg4iFp.2,;m. wY.Op �,aow ,a and .c�. c�4 'N' mo qdi o;.o o� o� w rwaw. Nam( O^!VpwCU ? NCeli~ �.% `0. p � Vu4iO4V O�OEC mFKO.J4O 01� vT� 4t. VA .y� YG qa 4q Q� 46b�y r• VwS AMA 9 V ! Pa�W ad rw NO Rq 16..16r p• 44� J C.`.. :2 y yq L E Cr Vlw .9.•n v0 S. 2 yp.. � C� P s` CN =Vy a9 dh i b V ` t o 4 b N p A a ► a� � w dr "Yi `- j5 .O R ¢� M ► C „ O �w i y e5 _a. o� Au nq �iry u. aw rw 4 �4 uw o6. se t YZZ Y oo. aoM l V C� •L'A V✓ O O� O VON tq U n w n Lam.—^« Y C�..M�V.�I '^�. G'q.L ..P. q P � ,p N '•.� k .Li MT `ap oe y y`Y�' .MW ` V V•b y 4 CC w 4 f.� L S �P4 Y N N C q.� � N • C ya pn P 6 L•�y V p y' f L �W r O`. �C 4 `•<`^C r._ �U� w �� O 4¢y01 N d 4 Q� y. y G 9 k• c N �` d.. =~`N � qp"p 'c��45! _r> �i L 4�f w:` UP 01 c» Y G•q CV Yam' �NA~ pV L9 Yb +eNeCAC yN dp�OO �� ~u b C�� •OL NA. L.L ur A « C rM.G O •t.Y �� ,.�� y® � O q>� ry Y� 0� i� y. ,C� C� ;M y v:� t�C�. y •O _ Y Z. =a &aP«fall eLaN a4 Q �ip N d L..` _pCO 4SLS ..Yhipr «E b C y�d 9 Y.Y 3 ag T N sP.�Y 4 C b w�Y•o p 01 M� L.� N � ram y u. ce mac •. z o �vM '^ +?a« .n a. ci« H 4. q e L y. r� �. yQp.0 r yoyb�� � a ` �,�p�• p .may„o. q w Q >,.. .. y �C .. g L.�r Zv. O.O L 4 O IHE fip p �du tiC1b 'N d C � ! G q c� hM WS •L'L Spy W q 3R r` O+ RA �\ _F g �1 Yq•R. K'» N�� Nty�',I `i..•s�. �2 «y Mc n L o. M Rn L . C V l 4 V N W .Y.-• � pN 6 � Ft GNy 4.1 �p vY yo n. a P e «+tsN O Y N 5} OtC ,uy y "P' p. PN88 V` 4 Ox,2 44 y«Yi Nv r Y ` � ggOY �• y wow. �� y l•y w.y •� i j V r YO. S NV L1.0 O]t. Yp O ACP { 4 s Y N.O OY .. gJVu Y V.+�. y �� O� pa r K 66' uY �Y «PrL •y rpa. W OC. E Py4 3 AML CA _lj7l 6�IYa ti Y ti N Y n UN a• VGA %� d y- d9 «•C L Y V O:y 4� L r �� V R � u P o N OI u p P P w C y V y O. rq r 6nN <� �3.p O .. ►� LL 6�. I:. Til i i "L (ESOLUTION NO. ,86-107 ->' " A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMigISS'ON APPROVING THE AMENDMENT TO CONDITION NO. 1 Or PLANING FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13059, THE -WILLIAM LYON COMPANY, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST WHER OF MILLIKEN A1C'�,IUE AND THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILRCV s WHEREAS, cn the 7th day of July, 1986, an amendment-,was f�4r,d by The William Lyon Company, for review of the above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 23rd day of July, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning romnission held a public hearing to consider the above-described project. , NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION I: That the amendment to Condition No. 1 of Planning for Tentative Tract 13059 shall read as: Prior to recordation of Tract 13059, all Conditions of Approval applicable to and imposed upon Tentative Tract 13022 shall be complied with, ..Kith the exception of off-site improvements which } shall be completed prior to the homeowner occupancy of the first unit within this Tract. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF JULY, 1986. p` P NIN COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: enn Sou ,:` a ma { ATTEST: ra u err, Ueputy secretary r. I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do 'hereby certify that:the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a kguur meeting of the 'Planning Commission held on the Z3rd day of Julu, 1986_ bh; the following vote-to-wit: r AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, MCNIEL, CHITIEA, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS. NONE 1 ABSENT.: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER A �t �-47 RESOLUTION NO. , A RESOLUTION OF THE 12,)KHO CUCIHIONGA PLANNING COMMISSION / APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW "OR TRACT NO. 13059 LOCATED NORTH OF THE SOUTHERN PP 11-I`C RATIZAD, AND EAST OF THE DEER CREEP .�.�L.OQD C07ROL, 'HANNEL IN THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMk'.lil'� WHEREAS, on the loth day of September '1986, a complete app1i(,ation was filed by Republic Development for fIavlew .3f the above-described ect; and WHEREAS, on the 12th day of November, 100, the Rar.ho fucamonga Planning Ccaonission held a meeting to consider the above-described project. NOW, THERUVE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Le,misslon re'srived"as follows: SECTION 1: That the following can be mete "j 1. That th p`roposed project is consistotit with the objectives of the General Plan; &nd ; f 2. That the proposed use is in accord 'with the objectives of the Development Code and the 'Victoria Community Plan and the purposes of the district ,in ' )41.ich the site is located; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Lode and the :Victoria Community Plan; and 4. That the proposed use, tcaeyher wito the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental ;:o the public health., safety, or .welfare,, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in tti:e vicinity; and 5. That the proposed` subvivision design is;, substantially in conformance, with the original T^ntative Tract as apn;•oved. SECTION 2: That Design 'Review for Tract 13059 is approved subject to the foTTax ni`g:conditionsr 1. This approval is only for the proposed site plan, building architecture, and lot line adjustments plan submitted as part of this application. All Conditions of Approval for Tentative'Tract 13059 per Resolution "as. 86-54 and 86-167 shall remain' applicable with this approval for Design Review. Resolution No. Page 2 }, 2. Oetail6d site development plans, ir,slwding, but 'not limfted to, plot•,plans,, landscapelirrigation plans, fencing plans, "and architectural plans shall be " submitted for the review and approval of the City Planner prior to issuance of any building permits. Lti 3. On lots with 3-car garages, standard 2-car 'drive approaches (W = 16') shall be used on lots`,where a front building setback of 26 feet can bei Y;intained while still holding a minfirum 20 foo+ '> lat rear yard. Driveways can flare out to"a 3-car wide widths on private property. 4. Front yard setbacks shall be�jncreased to a minimum of 26' (measured fro-n back of srdewaik), for all lots, and only be permitted to be lessened to-18' on lots where it is necessary to accommodate minimum rear yard requiremen s (refer to condition #8). 5. Window upgrade treatments shall be'fprovided on any side or rear elevation that'is exposed to view from any, public right-of-way. Plus detailing the extent of this upgrade treataknt ant to what lots they are IP to be applied shall be submitted for the review and approval of the City Planner prior to issuance of any building permits: 6. Exterior siding material used on the font elevation shall be extended on the garage side elevation to the return fencing. Details of this treatment shall be suboitted for the review and approval of the City Planner prior to the issuance of any 'wilding permits. 7. An acoustical study detailing what mitigation measures, if any', are required to achieve noise levels, both exterior and interior, consistent with City Standards for lots abutting the railroad right- of-way shall be submitted for review and approval prior to the issuance of any building permits. 8. Eadh lot within. the project shall have a minimum flat M slope or less) rear yard open area.;from building to property line, or slope/retaining wall of 20 feet. A final detailed site plan which' indicates the slope and retaining wall locations and unit plotting shall be submitted prior tr= issuance_. ',F building permits. C41 Resolution No. Page 3 Agra 9. Corner side yard fencing for all corner Wgs shall be constructed of a decorative block r, terial. Details of the wail design shall "be included en the submitted-,landscape/irrigation plans, and shall be subject to the .,reviev and approval of. the City Planner prior to the issuuncc: +f huilding�'permits. f 10. Corner side yard fencing; and/or retaining walls shall be set back a minilmum distance of 6,f'eet from r t'a back i)f sidewalks, All retaining :walls exposed to public view shall be c,}Rsteucted of decorative t block, and all wood fencing instal °;-` the developer shill be treated with water sealant or stain, Where exposed to public view, Al fencing details shall be included within the landscape and irrigation plans and shall be 30 ect to review Arid approval by the City P1avnier prior..to the issuance of building permits. 11. For all corner._zots, the side yard bet ien the f sidewalk and the_ side yard fenrj.fng shall be landscaped and irrigated by the developer. 12. The front ••ard setback Or Lot 130 shall be Increased to 28' (measured from back-of sidewalk) to assist sight distance around the corner foh .added traffic safety. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1986. PLANMING COMMISSION OF THE 7-ITY OF RANCuO CUCt" aA BY: - •Dennis L. .%tout, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy ecre ary I, 3rad Bull-r,`Deputy Secretary of the Plannir.g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify,that *%e foregoing'Resolutien was euty and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of .Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of thud Planning Commission, held on the 12th day of November, 1986, ty the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: CC,44ISSIONERS's ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA`. STAFF REPORT is a r p F $ Z DATE: November 12, 1986 1977 TO: Chairman'and Members of the Planning Commission f, FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY Cynthia S: Kinser, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRD1MENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT o6-03 request o amend the enera ­ ,,i Wnn ` ` us,_, �k—, om Flood Control to Low-Medium D!ns.€ty Residehtial A"-8 dd ac) for 4U acres of land 1ocatad at the southwest corner. of the extensions of Banyan and Milliken - APA 201-271-55. it I. BACKGROUND: At the Manning Commission meeting "of September 24, T , a:request by Laing Home., was presented to redesignate 40 acres of land on the southwest corner of the extensions of Bany,in and Milliken from Flood Control to Low-Medium Density Residential (4-8 dulac). At this meeting, concern was ra"ssed as to the .-,zost appropriate designation of the land in relation to surrounding development and land use, Staff was directed to re-examine the area and come back with_mon detailed information. i II. ANPLYSIZa The subject n 'e (see Exhibit '"B") is currently 'd Res i gn�d food Control, dIi1a, to the channel i zi ng of 0 er Creek, the site is no longkr subject to flooding and fray now be considered for development, Foy more detail of the site, sae the attached Staff Report. For the following descriptions, refer to Exhibit '"A - To the south of the subject site, the land is vacant and currently designated as Medium Dersity residential (8-14 du;ac) on the Development District t4ap. The General Plan Land Use M=N shows the I site as a proposed high school. The proposed Foothill freeway takes approximately 113 of the proposed high school ,1te, which does pot leave enough land for the high school. At this time, however, the school district hat indicated that a site adjacent to a freeway is not desirable ant. that more - pproprrate sites are Currently under cattidbration, Southeast of the site the land; -�s vacant and designated as Medium C,nsity Residential, The adjae�2nt property being Medivc✓-:High (14= Lit du/ac) with an approved tract of 308 condominium units. 1 . ITEM D mom. �'�..n,ro;i -,-ri�ar PLAkkiNG CbmtssabN srAF6 F'REPORT General Plan Amendment 86-03A Novembew,12, 1886 Page r J Land west of tiff site i'ir` designated Law-Medium Residential and the site is vacant. Adjacent to this site the property is designated Low-Medium'f and has an approved tract for 304 single family units. The northwest property_ is ,vacant and cu-erently designated Low- Medium Density Residential. This site is currently under, consideration for a land use change (GPA 86-07D) from Low-Medium to Low Density Residential'-'(2-4 du/ac). General Plan amendment 86-030 has been continued to Jan,,ary`14, 1987 °.• North and northeast of the su*4&i site is vacant and desig►gated as m. Flood Control. The land belong;) i!o the San Bernardino County Flood Control District and may be capable of being developed ir the i future. The Caryn Planned Comamunity is to the east of the site. The land is designated as Low Density Residential with 61000T11,000 square foot lots for an average of 7,200 square foot lots north of the spine,road and 4,000-10 000 square foot lots south of the spine read with an average of 5,100 squa,2, fwt lots. III. LAND USE ALTERNATIVES: IY The Commission may consider tile' a I l owing as possible designations f for the subject site: I� 1. Flood Control: This is the €urr•tnt designation of the land. The land may remain with this desiar.:,cion, but as the land is no longer required for flood control use, a change will eventually orcur. 2. Low Density. Residential (2-4 du/ac): A change to this designation 011 be cons s en w— and uses to the eastAn the Caryn Planned Community. However,,, may be some compatibility problems with the land to, the south, currently designated Medium Residential (8-14 du/aL), unless that parcel is also reconsidered. 3. Low-Medium Density/Residential (4-8 du/ac): This designation s requested y the applicant and is cansTstent with current ,designations to the west and northwest, and compatible with other existing designations'in the icamediate area. 4 Medium Density Residential (&44 du/ac):. This would be consistent witn the deslgnations Toe­§outh,and southwest, but less compatible with land to the east. �-2 rn PLANNING CO MISSIOX St#F'REPOR7 General PI al, Amen nt 86-03A Novgmber 14 1985 4 Page 3 f IY- RECOMMENDATION: St�lf is requesi ing direction as to the most a g ec Flom the rand use. pprapr a e c esi r� 'lion 'of the su}j t �t s� ,- alternatives if a flood Control is preferred, r-i 8ssolutioa-.of Denial is:-approprJa�;e... If a Low or Medium Densij Y,g��identiat is preferred, tr,elt approval of the Resolution ofDenial aqd a request for this cl;;ange to be brought forward in the next General Plan 7t cycle would-be appropj�iate. If the Commission prefers a Law-Medium y k1 Density Residential drsfgnation, per the applicant's request, then. a Negative Declaration and approval of the attached Resolution of Approval would be appropriate. rF 1 f Res ul ly submi Brad Bu11 r C` City Planner SE•CK:d r AML Attachments: k;xhfi t "A" - Existing Land U!te Designations Ohibit "S" - Deveiopment District &'General Plan Stiff R-aport ,of September 24, 1986 Re"AA ution �f Approval Rei1�Jutiovl of Denial, t I t. o• ;e srw .�� r.yy�IY�.,Ae.4 .,...•.0� J i WI. r - Darm Lm LM S �tY'f, +-cis_ i i LM®' 'CARYN I . ....: PLANNEb Lm _ FC 1/IC'TAR! _PL Development Districts � e Chaffs 7.. _�G��tS _ - .•� College - - r - s ..., B9 _ {,� a . '.Q .....: 1N�6LL11111�® 6` `S General flan NORTH C1 v� �) ITEM: '"°J RANCHO C ON A TYTY�Y�i';G�N�RtsL Pu�.N��&yEL, t g PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT:, SCALE: R. P CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ��CAatita�� STAFF REPORT Qa E � Z DATE: September 24, 1986 1977 E TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Coinmission FROM; Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Cynthia S. rinser, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL .PLAN AMENDMENT 86-WA - LAING HOMES - A request to ameno a General Plan Land Use map- rom Flood Con rot to Low-McAum Density Residential (4-8 du/cc)' for- 40 acres of land "located at the southwest corner of the extensions of Banyan and Milliken - APN - 201-271-55. I. ABSTRACT: Laing Names has ,`;iitiated this General Plan Amendment' roam ood Control to Lct Medium Density Residentiai far 40 acres of land located on the southwest corner of the extensions of Banyan and Milliken (see Exhibit "A"). Staff has completed an Environmental Assessment and analysis of the proposal and recommends approval of the Amendment. II. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. action Requested: Amend the General Plan Land Use Map from 00 rontro`1 to Low-Medium Residential. B. Location. Southwest corner of the extensions of Banyan and< C. Parcel Size: 40 acres of land. D. Existing Developmeat District: Flood Control. E. Existing Land Use., Vacant. F. Surrounding General Plan Desiglations: Worth - Flood-ControT_' South Proposed high cfiool, Flood Control. East - Low Density Residential. West Low-Medium Density Residential. G. Surrounding Land Use and Development District Designations: North vacant; Flood Control.-" South Vacant; Medium Density Residential. East - Single family residential; Caryn Planned Community. qP West - Vacant; Flood Control. PLANNING COMMISSION S,Wt REPORT ' ' GPA 86-03A - LAING HOMES S2ptember_24, 1985 Page 2 H. Site Characteristics: Vegetation consists of scattered trees, grasses,`.an wee s, o herwise vacant. 111. GENERAL PLANLAMENDMENT ANALYSIS: I 1. Flood Control: The General Plan,,,Land Use Map designates the project si eeas, Flood Cohtrol. The purpose of this designation Is to 'preserve land that is particularly subject to flooding and for Protection in other areas due to flooding. The General Plan states: n portions e. the City fall within the 100 year Flood Plain which is an area of land subject to potential inundation by a storm whose intensity occurs on the average of once every 100 year's." "Upon improvements to both Cucamonga Creek and Deer Creek, flood hazard areas will be significantly diminished west of Milliken Avenue.: Floodwaters in the a City have seriously damaged homes,,vehicles, and roads, as well as threatened lives. Moreover, the debris And 6 soil carried by the flood waters are deposited on local ! streets, private yards.} and driveways, resulting in E significant maintenance and repair costs." The Deer Creek Channel has been completed and according, to the Federal Emergency Mi�nagement Agency, the project site is no longer subject to flooding; The lamb is privately owned and and may be { considered for develoj.qent (see Exhibit D ). 2. School Facilities: Since the area immediately adjacent to the subject site s signated as a potential high school on the General Plan, staff has contacted the Chaffey High School District-for comments, The District indicates primary interest in another general location, but does express potential interest in the subject site as a secondary choice (see Exhibit "C") An issue is whether the subject site should retain its current Flood Control designation or whether it should be redesignated for some form of development. The site it privately owned, no longer subject to;flooding and not heeded for flood controrr purposes. The applicant is requesting a Low-Medium Density Designation. The School District is not requesting that the site be reserved as a school at this time. Should the City approve the proposed-LM Designation, the High School District will have another opportunity to comment, if and when a subdivision map or a development project is filed for the site. At that time, the District would have the option of pursuing acquisition of the site if the primary location is no longer viable. 12" / PLANNING COlirtISSI'QN S...rF REPORT 1, GPA 86-03A LAIN4 HOMES September-24, 1986 Page 3 V f 3. Land-Use Compatibility: The site is adjacent to Low and Low-Medium ' Bensi'cy es en a w th medium .Density Residential along Highland Avenue and the future Route 30 Freeway. The designation :of Low Medi,m , Density Resideential appears compatible with the adjacent' uses. The General Plan discusses this use as follows; 01 "Low, Medium ('4-8 dwelling units per, gross acre), T4ye low-me um category 'is characterized by residential densities somewhat greater than the low density residential group. With gross densities` averaging between 9-8 dwelling units per acre, considerably more housing types- may be used, including typical single- family, single-family zero:lot line, duplex,, ;and under certain conditions up to 4-6 townhouse-.type uiA ts. This category would be appropriate within low density areas to encourage greater housing diversity without changing the single-family ,:character of the Surrounding residential character." IV. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The initial Study has been completed by s a and no significant adverse environmental impacts were considered to be associar`,ed with the site. u. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Should the Commission" upon examination of the General Plan en ent, decide that this change would promote the Land Use Goals and Policies of the General' plan and would not be detrimental to the adjacent properties or cause significant adverse impacts as listed under the Environmental Assessment, the following findings are necessary for approval; A. The Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan, . B. The Amendment does promnte the goals of the Land Use - Element, and G. The Amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. VII. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The ai y. ; epos newspaper and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 #eet of the subject site, i To date, only the aforementioned response from the Ghaffey School District has been received, 4 r� PlANNtNG CON1i SS * TM� REPORT � , GPAGS 03p,"; L , G, HOMES Septemr 24, 19$5 Page 4 1 " VIII. RECOMMENDMON: Staff .recommends, approval of the Generat"'P1an Amendment ;r as proposed. , the Planning Commission finds the Amendment warranted, adoption of the attached Resolution recommending approval to the City Council of the General Plan Amendment and .issuanFe of a Negative ,-Declaration would be,appropriate. If the Planning Commission finds that the requested'Amendment is ,yin. .. conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and does not f. promote the Goals and Objectives of the Land Use Element, adoption of the attached Resolution of Denial Would beapproprtate.� Re a fully tt. r ul e City Planner :t BB CK•ko Attachments; Exhibit "A" _ Subject Property Exhibit V -�/,General Plan & Development Districts Exhibit CO" -;Letter from Chaffey School District Resolution of`Approval Resolution of Denial • li w 77 VIM ^a c t� `�` Cl 1 '�L• 10 itRtv is v Subject Property 179 acres? Property affected by CPA GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT- SITE PLAN JOHN LAING HOMES DATE PRVAR$Ds 7-3-96 el i 177 - _ College � _ = s ---- r - �" :.-���• acre,�� '.�®� �� . ........ 0 General Plan u=---�' VI. • LMO _ LMI LM® I LM®_ ,CARYNI :.PLANNE®� I — me M COMMUNI+Y. I - { f LM o � LM FO VICTORIA PL Y V V Dovelopmentt Districts nUItTH I CITY or, T T ITEM:�P�. �&-oa A AI R CHO Cj. CKNIONGA TITLE. Diu , PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT- 1t- SCALE: �" 14111a 6�� it N y CHAFFEY JOINT,----.-,, WON HIGH SC1�OOL DI TR'l T 211 WEST FIFTH STREET,ONTARIO,CAUFOSNIA 91762-198 (714)988.8511 � t ,a SL;krintendanintSchoda Asfocatr5t+pednlandant AWSlantSUpadntendent 1dlka 0,Olrkaen. Admin0raWnlParmonnel Instrueaon Dean Ej Smothers- Botts a.murlson BOARD OF TRUSTEES,.VAthlaan E,fWay•Birt C.Martin Raymond J.Sam•Chades J,Ulu"9y•.Gerald W.Wolf 5, 7986 t -n,. fiuoc<ate Ptannen I 4NCtrv'CUCAM0MGA 907 samonga, Chyi 91730 cat Ptan Am _,_,Rent $6-03A ie to 96. Liza L.eningetr'.a tetterc od Augu6t 13, 1986 &egarrding the ptopeity .n nonth od Wghtand -- .the but anrwe& we can give yoa iA that the ,8ttAttt Z6 (1onhidening another )xopeaty " ,its jt2At choice but .that the. vcopekty,tv3utd.6tatt he cone<dened ,ahoutcd ouwt j.iazt choice not pan out. ' that up-Ae we to become mote inteAuted in the M t£.lhen pnopeAty :it he nathehn 4oAty aaAez, ptae oAl mznu.6 with no .nte,%ut .n the--6outhetft coutd be make Ape-,-i6 ie'.i n ouA tupome. BUTTERS nvzce 6 CITY OF R CHo cu _... PLANNlhG DI*�CAA40NGA L ON Alta 5EP U 8198i 718Sbt(lUtfj7!'(111�1 FM S. KauseA LAMP,r CHAMY ADU-T EDWAMN.CKWEY'<OGMalGA EllwANDA+MON rGtA.IR•114TAW.tAM,ANU•VMLtt:Y u1t1Y `i. � I k 1 is L:;1 !.-� d HlOHL/RMD RVEHU� j{ ` *Z i i i i i i i i i i NO RITI t i CITY GI: ITEND jra.PA gx� OS A PLANNING DIVISIONLt ii�i`1`! RESOLUTION NO, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERALS LAN AMENDMENT NO. 86-03N,- LAING HOMES, *UDING THE LAND USf--ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN FROM FLUD"CONTROL TO LOW,MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (4-8 OUTAC) FOR 40 ACRES OF°r,NND LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EXTENSIONS'OF BANYAN AND MILLIKEN - APN 201-271-5�_ WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a, duly advertised public hearing_ to consider all comments on-`the proposed Gene► l Plan Amendment No. 86-03A. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby makes the follow'ngr'-" 1n'cings: (: A. The Amendment does not conflict, with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan. B. The Amendment promotes goals of the Land Use Element. C. T.,e Amendment would not be materially injurious or \` h detrimental to the adjacent properties. fallow:>: SECTION 2: The General Plan- Land Use Map shall be amended as Assessor's Parcel NLmber 201�271-55, approximately 40 acres in size and located on the southwest corner of the extensions of Banyan and Milliken shall be changed from Flood Control to Low-Medium Density Residential (4-8 du/ac). SECTION 3: A Negative Declaration is hereby recommended-for adoption by-fffe--CTzy Council for this General Plan Amendment, based upon the completion and findings of the Initial Study. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission does hereby recommend approval of General Plan Amendment No. 86-03A to the City Council. APPROVED AL40 ADOPTED THIS 12th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis [. Stout,-Chairman i .7 .. , v t ) M s y + ATTEST• 'I Brad-gul Ierg, epu y 5erne ary I, Brad Buller, Oepu,ty Secretary of the planning commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, -&hereby, certify that the fareq ing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, pass's&; and adopted by the PlAnnings'Coinissinn of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planting Commission held V on the 12th day of November,, 2986 by the following vote,to-wit: { AYES; COMMISSIONERS; NOES: COMMISSIONERS.. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: h _ t r } I RESOLUT16N NO. ,r A RESOLUTION 'OF:THE -PLANNING C0114ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAC�ONC,A. CALIFQRNIA RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO, GPA 8643A - LAING HOMES ' REQUESTING AN, AMENPMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF TH-E " ; ~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL`PLAN �,10� FLOOD CONTROL. TO.LOW- MEDIUM,`,DENSITY RES°IDENTIAL t4-b DU AG) FOR 40 ACRES OF LAND L+'WED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EXTENSIONS OF OANYM AND`MILLIKEN - APN 201-271,755. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a. duly advertised public hearing to consider ail,.covpents on the proposed General Plan Amendment No. v 86-03A. _ u. SECTION 1_ The Rarrho Cucamonga Planning Cgsrsaission .cannot make the following fif n s, —. � A. The Amendment does .not confifet with 'they Land Use - /, Policies of the General Plan. B. The Amendment promotes'goal`; of the Land Use Element. C. The Amendment would not be niateriall.y injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. NOW, THEREI--ORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the 1ancho Cucamonga Punning Commission does hereby rezom;aend.denial of General P1an,.4merdment No. 86-03A. APPRGIED AND. DOPTED THIS 12TH DAY'OF'NOVEMBER, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, epu y Secretary ry zz- I, Brad alIer, Aeputty.Secretary of the Planning. (;OMissfon of the Cfty Of j Rancho du�amonga, do hereby certify that ;the foregoing ResOlution�i�as duly and F.. regularly introduced, passed, and ado, 5y the planning ' cHn�ission of the ,.. City( Of RancP#© Cuce"onga, ai;a regular meeting of the Plan6ing Commission hei.d w on the 12th day of kwwe � 1986, by the following vote-to-wit: �'`, I AYES: CO1I"SSIOkERS NOES: COt6MISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS 3 i r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAb[!�NGA o�cnn�a STAFF RE'POR aAdftL o 0 DATE: November, 1 , 15+'a 7977 I O Chairman and Members of the Planning Cormission f FROM:' Brad Buller, City Planner 3Y: Nancy Fong, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 86-15 G .'N COACH A he estab-Ti-shment of a motor ►I me pus assembly bus nes within an existing 168',OUO square foot industrial builuin3, and the a3,000 sglare foot expansion of;the existing building on 11.8 acres of land in the General - Industrial/Rail Served District ' (Subarea 2), located at the southeast corner of Arrow Highway andz Vineyard Avenue APN 209-012-15. (Continued I from October 8, 19861. DEVELOPMENT` REVIEW 86-13 MODIFICATION -,MESSENGER, The request modify t n previously approvec,elan by reducing the site area of Phase III from 4.4 acres to 2.9 acres in the General Fndustrial/Rail Served District (Subarea 21, iocated at the northeast corner of 9th Street and Vineyard Avenue - APN 2U9-012-16. (Continued from October 9, 1986.) I. ABSTRACT: The applicant, Crown Coach, is requesting approval os a ondtional Use Permit for establishing a bus assembly business within the existing building;> and to modify the scope` of the project by eliminating the proposed 83,000 square feet expansion of the existing facility. II. 8ACKGROUNO: The Planning Commission, at its regular mreying of cttoober5—, 198G, conducted a Public Hearing to consider thy: above cescribed project. Mr. Ernie McMahon of Crcwn Coach International stated at the mep-ing that he disagreed with the reconimended Conditions of Approval. The Planning Commission directed staff to discuss and clarify the recormsended Conditions of Approval with the applicant, and continued this item to this regular meeting.. On October` 29, 1986, staff met with the applicant, Mr. McMahon of Crown Coach, and the property owner, Mr. Dana Sanders of Messenger Investment Company, to discubs and clarify to them the intent of those recommended. Conditions of Approval. Staff suggested to, Mr.McMahon and Mr. Dana Sanders that if they still disagree with some of the Conditions or i&vuld like to modify the languages of l some of the Conditions, they should provide staff with such list so ITF14_E PLRYiNUG CO MI1SSI0W�'W REPORI CUP `o 15 and tin 8&,,3 November 12, 1981'Page 2 " that we could review and report back to the Planning Commission at ' this regaiar sleeting., Mr. Sanders�of Mftsenger Investment Company notified staff by Phone on November 3; 1985 that Cronin Coach -has decided not to,expand the existing facility but to move: into the existing building. . According to Mr. Sanders, there is a new owner of Crown Coach Ir.ternaticmali, This change could result in modifications fo 'the developmeht plans A and recomMq-ded Conditions of Approvol of the Conditional Use l7eM-ft Th&df-oro, staff recommends that this;.item be continued ,t� the._Decensb'e� 10, 1986 regular Planning Commission meeting t¢ a11'ow staf an p p¢rtunity t6 work with the applitarpt i:i obtaining addition °oramation on the propose. change it the project sr:opa. At the-Aime of this report, staff has. not received than additional inf-56 tiara. III. RECOMMENDATIM4 Staff recommends that the Planning Commission,h wilt si ,consent 'of the applicant,. corti;�ue izis' item 'to= Vie December 10, 198Zi Planning q! Commission meeeting. Further, staff reA .s brief dis ussio� from the Planning Commission as to the si�ecific Conditions of Approval that should be imposed on this Project as staff further reviews it. b. Re Ully ed r m , Brad 1 City Planner 1 BB:NF:ns Jf Attachments: October $, 1986 Planning Commission Staff Report 'I Ae d jq CITY OF RANCHO WCAMONGASTAFF REPORT z a t r o DATE: October 8, 1986 477 TO; Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission T?ROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong:, Associaye Planner r SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIf'�86-15 e estabUshment o a motor ome ids arse y usiness within an existing'168,000 square foot industrial building, and the 83,000 expansion of such existing :industrial -building on 11.8 acres of land in the General Industrial/Rail Served District (Subarea 2), located at the southeast corner of Arrcd Highway and Vineyard Avenue - APR 209-013-15, 0 (Continued from September 24, IM at the.request of the applicant) DEVELOPMENT REVaEW 86-13 MODIFICATION - MESSENGER The request madify tfie previously approved TWsTer an by reducing the site area of Phase Ili from 4.4 acres to 2.9 acres in the General Industrial/Rail Served District (Subarea 2)s located at the northeast corner of 9th Street and Vineyard Avenue - APN 209-012-15. (Continued from SWaiber 24, l w` at the reqsest of the applicant I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Regn�e�s_te_d_•_ Approval of a Conditional Use Permit for a mo or ome s uassembly use, and approval of ,site plan, olevation,,and modifization to Phase III of the Master Plan for Development Review 86-13. B. Surroundin -Land Use and Zoning: North - Apartment under construction; Medium Residential District (8-14 du/ac). South - Vacant; General Industrial/Rail Served 1Subarea 2). East Vacant with approved 26-acre industrial master plan; General Industrial/Rail Served (Subarea 2). 4 West Mini warehouse, multi-tenant industrial park; Gener� r-'' Industrial (Subarea 1). r - "r f t `PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT A CUP 65-16 - MESSENGER/CR94N COACH a - October S, 1986, x Page 2 !f C. General Plan Des��gno�aonsz ra ec a e - e�nerai Y�ustrial/Rail Served. North Medium Densitar} yesidential. South - General Indust,lai/Rail Served. East - General Industrial/Rail Served.' Hest General Industrial. D. Site Characteristics: The site is developed with a 168,000 square foottfin'udTrial building with approximately,290 parking spaces. The southern portion of the project site is vacant and is part of a-previously approved Phase III of the Master Plan for DR 86-13. E. licable Regulations: The proposed use is categorized as medium manufacturing wwhich requires.a Conditional Use Permit within General Industrial/Rain Served District Subarea 2 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. II, ANALYSIS. A. General: < The site was originally developed as a manufacturing 3u- TdT'ng For Otis Elevator Plant and was last occupied by a Wheat Motorhome Assembly. The existing building is presently unoccupied. Some on-site and off=isite Mrovements exist; however, certain improvements are considered as non conforiaing. For example, -;aissing improvements include such items as meandering sidewalks, extra 4-foot dedication along p Arrow Highway, on-site landscaping, screening of outdoor I storage and plaza areas. t Crown Coach International is proposing to relocate from their Chino facility to this existing building. They are proposing to expand the extstine,building by adding 83,000 square feet of floor area in order to accommodate their assembly business of ilotorhome and school 'buses. To con4)ly with the City's packing ^equirements, the site area has to expand southerly to include ;a portion of Phase III of an approved Master P;an (Development '-Review 86-13) as shown in Exhibits "C" and RV-' '= Since both parcels are owned by the same developer, Messenger Investment: Compai.y is requesting for an amendment to the previously approved Master Plan by reduc'ng the size of the Phase III site area. To alleviate heavy traffic along Vineyard Avenue, the developer is providing access to 9th Street through Phase III of the Master Plan of OR 86-13, and take advantage of the traffic lights at the intersection of 9th Street and Vineyard Avenue,., PLANNING C"ISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 86-15 - MESSENGER/CROWN COACH C October g, 1986 Page 3 B. Des'ic,t, Review :Committee: The Committee has reviewed the P-rojeCt and hai­­F—e5offi—effired that the project be improved with the following conditions: . Site Plan: a. The Committee determined that the loading dock ~ s could be located on the west side:of the building due to: o` The finished grade established�iby the existing building, �:i' o lite natural slope of the land��from" north to srAth, and ��; o Th;'?cature of the assemblying operation. However, it shall be screened with a combination of decorative block wall, mounding, and landscaping from Vineyard Avenue. The length of the screen wall shall be determined, he City Planner. b. The existing site area should be upgraded, as much as possible, to conform to current City's Codes. Only one driveway access should`;be allowed on Vineyard Avenue and Arrow Highway. The existing driveway on Vineyard Avenue across ,from the proposed loading dock should be eliminated. Two of the three existing driveways on Arrow Highway should be eliminated and redesign the driveway access 'as shown in Exhibit "k". c. Straight sidewalk should be provided along Vineyard Avenue. �. The existing concrete wall should be continued along the entire length of the project on Vineyard Avenue. e, The developer should fully improve the driveway access to 9th Street. f, A six-foot wide landscape planter or a continuous six to ,eight foot high block wall should be provided along the entire length of the existing AmIk and the proposed building (east elevation), for screening the outdoor storage of finished vehicles as shown in Exhibits HE" and "H". PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT' CUP 86-15 MESSENGER/CROWN COACH," October 8, 1986 Page 4 g. Employee outdoor eating area or plaza area`shofild be provided on the 'north side of the existing building, h. A uniform design of fencing materials (block wall, wrought-iron and security gates) should be provided. The existing chain-link fence and barbed wire should be replaced with wrought-iron materials. 2. Elevations: a. The existing building should be upgraded with re- painting the building, replacing any, broken windows, providing roof screen in screening all roof-mounted equipments. b. The exposed footing of the nets building located at the west and south eleva.r ins should be covered with materials consistent"witth the architecture to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. Landsca,iing: a,, w[l existing trees should be saved by remaining'in place or relocated to a more suitable area. o. A six-foot wide landscaped planter should be provided along the east property boundary for the entire length of the parking area as shown on Exhibits"E" and "H". c. Special landscaping treatments such as increased number of trees and shrubs should be provided within the setback area along Arrow Highway per City requirements. d. The double row of specimen size trees should be continued along the setback area of Vineyard Avenue. to be consistent with the existing ` portions of the site. C. Grading Committee: The Grading Committee has reviewed the proposed graying plan and was concerned with the 9 foot to 12 foot high retaininq walls along the eastern property boundary as shown on Exhibits "F" and "G". Current standards allow a maximum of 4 foot high retaining wall with a maximum wall height of 9 feet including the four feet retaining portion. The Committee :recommended that the - developer mitigate the aesthetic and visual impacts of the retaining walls by providing terraced planters as shorn in Exhibit "G". This ' PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 85-15 MESSENGER1CR0WN COACH October 8,,'1986 Page 5 mitigation measure requires cooperation from the"ad$,acent property owner or developer. SoRce­the adjacent property owner'�and developer r, is the same one as this priMect, a Condition of Approval requiring terraced planters along the 'west property boundary for Development Review 86-13 has been placed in a separate Resolution for the modification request for this approved Plaster Plan, D. Environmental Assessment: Staff has completed thr Environmental Efircklistan ae .e erm ned thwt the development of this project may expose i people or property to water-related hazards such as flooding. However, a drainage stuey Iilas been required to be submitted to the City for rpiew in ordi,` to determine the mitigation f measures for alleviating t"4 potential pr�biem of flooding on-site to the satisfaction of the City Engineer`; Therefore, staff has determined that there will not be significant impact in case because the mitigation measure as recommended has been added to the Conditions of Approval. if the Planning Commission concurs with *these findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. T11. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the General Plan and the Industrial Specific Plan in that: the site plan and building design with the added conditions provide for a safe working environment; the proposed use promotes employment opportunities as an integral part of a balanced community. In addition, the proposed use, building design, site plan, together with the recommended 'Conditions of Approval are in compliance'with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and Specific Plan. The proposed use, together with conditions applicable thereto, would not be detrimental to the public health, safe.y and welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. IV. COnkESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Daily Re ort newspaper and public hearing notices were sent to all' properties within 3O0 feet of the project site. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission consider all input regarding this project. If the Cogmission concurs with the findings, then issuance of a Negative Declaration and approval of Conditional Use Permit 86-15 and modification to`Development Review 4G-13 would 4e appropriate. Res fully s tted Brad Bui er AlAlk City Planner OC•NF:ko z ..; -f7W PLAN ; tBiC15I0 S7r AFF REPORT i X r � ��- CUP 86 JhR - NtSSEMi&GR/GR`OIik COACH r O toher o3;, 198Er• �. Page 6 ' c; l y Attachments: - Exhibit "A" -Location. Map Exhibit`B".•- Site Utilization :Rap Approved Master Plan for DR 86-13 Exhibit "D" . �*alficati6n to Phase III.of the Master Plan for'BR-86-13 Exhibit "E" - Detait ed Site Plan Exhibit:"E" 'Conceptual Grading Plan, €xhfbit %=-�"`�Thrraced•Planters Along East Property 6o fidary .. l� Exhibit '�H'� - Okeptual Land'rcape Plan i Extlibit �'I" - E va�tions � Exhibf, L` tion of New Driveway on Vineyard Avenue "- Exhibit "IC" - R6,�:� gn:of New Driveway on rrow Highway Exhibit "L" - D'res . of off-5i�te i rov6*nt�at the i t intersect;iorl��o 'Arra Highwayy,and Vineyard Avenue Resoluti:oic,of A rora:al With Standard.Conditions for CUP 86-15 Resolution of 91,; m,4al for DR 8643 146difidation �l! Aft i F r ®r ��i 5�.® MMISNOER INVESTMEW,Co.99RD.NY w September 23, 1986 1 Planning Cormission Members ` f, City of Rancho Cucamonga 'f 9320 C Baseline Road cs. Rancho Cucamonga„ Cal fore:"A 91734 RE: 901 Arrow Route, rancho Cucamonga fDear Planning Commission Members: Lew Werner, Chairman =of &-Z wn roach ac h International ha advised us this afternoon that 14 and the Presid6fit will be unable to attend the scheduled Planning Commission Meeting Wednesday, September 24, 1986 and is requesting a continuation of the Planning Commission. Meeting to October 8, 1986. We ara sorry for any inconvenience ,- this may cause. Sincerely, Dana S. Sander.-_ Vice Preuident Southern California Commercial Development DSS/cl cc: Jack Lam Brad Buller Nancy Fong Bill Messenger, Jr. 1��f 16912-A Yon Kcrmon Avenue,Irvine,CA 92714 7141474-1300< Crown Coach k International L. September 19, 19s6 City of Rancho Cucamo),Iga Planning Commission 9320-C Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 3 Dear Commission Members: RE: Conditidnal Use Permit/Development Approval for Crown CoachInternational 86-15 On behalf of Crown Coach International and Messenger Investment Company, are have discussed the Preliminary Design G Review Comments dated August 17, 1986 regarding the above- i referenced project. 4 From the onset. it has been the intent of Crown Coach International to oocupy the existing facility at 8901 Arrow t Route in its present state, With an addition to the south end of the facility. We will be able to improve Arrow Highway, to Its ultimate width by expanding the current roadway four additional feet as well as installing an employee drive approach off of 9th Street which will give acili to the parking lot. All other items discussed in the letter dated August 11, IS186 prepared by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department Staff are notable to be Installed due to 1) _ operational constraints i.e., ls,cation of loading dock or, 2) an Impact to the oronomics>'both of which would prohibit a relocation to this facility. In summary, it Is the intent of Croon Coach International to occupy this facility t-�d bring an additional employment base to the City of 450 employees. We look forward to being an asset to the city of Rancho Cucamonga, E Sincererly, f Llewellyn C. Werner William S. Messenger, Jr. Chairman of the Board President Crown.Coach International Messenger Investment Co. WSM/jbt q"t'R 'i _ __. �� � � n � ,'; x. w �'w '� _ '� r - 3 � �-...iA1�i t s � -.� ��� x r �� � X� .�tii� u�" Y; « �. T �. �ti � � .�r M ..� ,�.y......t .... <... �....,r ,.._ {H �3�ii �. { � �� ,. � �—�. �F„�, �• �''~1r' �.. c M � rt y' ' �..• � _ � ids-��`t ��@. r _f -`V� � � it r . A{ ,�c wr 7 1 �a � t+t � .�a ,,r, s< ��ya.. �. `� fir„ �: �. ..�. � , .r � �r1sl ��. ��� L f 1 TOWM AU ww.waw krhw,sir+ A !f tBYeSqut (iQ ! Ik �I j � ..... M4. A } --r ',.fit YIYLYMY l VllRTH CITY OF tom: CUCAMON Tflu- 0 PLANNNG DrVISKIN i zz Tr i ----R— .,a fill t ci41 Z4 1160. te p q ! arrianv aavxatiiaAffwc i �� s 3 1 p1 r g s a.I tR�t � i{ Iv Llt — --•tT- r r R 'a Lu lu Al luN ;' e� i� I to laMr W -?111k3AC OtIYA3NIA •---�---_ �a is "1sy !d It i I: d POM is YGJ"akN1t iPR HOUSING (1( � � N�4 I�•_J� �N m\*faanyvK',: -•ARROW It -- ;, + rroaruroe• ancy,ras. 1 / !� Auto {la (! TI exlsrnla unn a ( 9�6 Mi 6 sED 1BU TEru SE �a l��!DIOttN �6q war NR"CT DATA i. `j �flOq NI.Mff. Yf3M V. ]M.f1y V.a ilalti/IANYI I 11 -�tl ntNv; ntw u�. �taNu:Nfrwtuuao ui 11 1 {atlf,LL\N>ANIJ7 p, ! r np\Tµ\Ytp9e kff i !.J•\Yp„DYb \N I,OiLL\iNf{.Atipq i WaREwatsEPa 8fT_ E_ALAN. lilt I.II II` CROWN COACH MANUFACTURING ASSEMBLY F^.CILITY RANCHO Wtv ikMONGA.CALIFORNIA NOXTH CITY OF ITEM: C�1V��I vCM CU T� i PINING DWSM j 1 � ' t,OS,M9 so nD ,Jr t l#IG IF,iA O •i"' [[[" �'j,.y rr sst4 cool sur1ON w-A r{N ExljTINS ELNLDlNG j$ fL 1. ( 4�; rj Yi.taoe NEW p,X?ANWON P; fill 3Y11 L1 f Nnui o�erei,or�emlr i NCRUI i CITY OF p RANCHO CTC aCN Trrt�' PLANNM DZVBM EMMAT, SCALE_ . 4W cW ft70 w DF ca -to 3'� D A � SECTION 6-e wow i • � I�Za r..•�. .i MFtcr®G 7PPP�4c-�' NORTH CITY O 1p PLANNING IDIVbMN LXHMM SC.t1M -r � r- aa[w.K47i 9ilvwv y� (I r BWax'.+w:s: EXISTtNCi Btl11.0'YQ l ! S r r Y NEW EXAAN310K TVP. rf.g�fen w 17Re• 4rt 4iNA+r�► o —: CROW14 COACH MANUFACURING r ASSEMBLY FACILITY PLAM RANCHO CUCA MONGA.CAjFORNIA I m'. I CIS OF lum: RANMO CtTCA► O F Yf r • r' a� {r 1 ! I ' C-r l rr a a � , s a k' i a, —ARROW ROUTE ® � EXISTING RETA@liNG� m WALL--1 cn, NEW SIDEWALn 10'-W WIDE CITY OF`.6,,.I wo f TYP. r r ' OFFtCE MEZZANINE J: i9 N NE E I XfST�i A G O —•— — — EXiSTW A!1 ...1 II sGROUND Dfl1VE-IN R I k � l i EXISTING BUILDING i 2 d ts 2 s FRET CANO= t G NIRTH CITY OF i RATdG1D JC ON A PLA�dI�1M DIVIS�UN LXHW SCAM : a ARk riiV ROUTE mso Cos EXISTING RETAINING m e r WALL rs NEW SIDEW/d!K 1®-Q %=E wy RIGHT OF WALK 362'r e i OFFICE MEZZANINE EXIS71NG L DADS Lo EXISTIM ALL: i� GROUND Ei RR7YE NN OOR Y � EXISTING BUILDING10 o I CITY OF is � - 1RAPCHO CJQA.igaNGA. •rrri.E:, ,.A Aae t9� PLANNING D� I C -Z2 i lowli 4+ ti o i Nuv PlaKfer.and wa/1 des<<��+ Kewe/I,q Sab jeci Ito }rka -p1Ko t t[ alp,orpvpl Gr 7`�l i 1 l NORM CITY OF ITEM: f�r�.NCHO CUCAMONGA Tt�: V1,5�rscs, PLANKING DIVbgON Ec[il]3rr: _SCAM C—2 ? RESOLUTION NO. A RES('UTION OF THE RANCHC CUCAMONGA 'PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 86-15 FOR THE r MOTORHOME/9US ASSEMBLY BUSINESS AND THE 83,000 SQUARE FOOT EXPANSION TO THE EXISTING INDUSTRIAL BUILDING'1 LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW HIGHWAY AND VINEYARD AVENUE IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL/RAIL SERVED DISTRICT (SUBAREA 2) OF THE -NDUSTRIAL.,SPECIFIC PLAN WHEREAS, on the :29th day of August, 1986, a complete application was filed by Messenger Investment ;Company for review of the above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 24th day of September, 1986, the Rancho CucamongaP16Aning Conmission held a public hearing to consider the above_=described ;. project and continued to October 8, 1986 regular meeting at the request of the :. applicant; and WHEREAS;,, on the 8th day !)f October, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Coumissim held a public hearing to consider the-.above-described w. project. foil o+as: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamnga Planning 3n ssion resolved as l SECTION 1: That,the`i=ollowing findings can be net: ,, 1. That the proposed use with the added conditions is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Industrial Specific Plan and the purposes of the district in which the site is locate, and that: a. It provides a ;pleasant, attractive and safe working environment. b. It promotes employment opportunities as an integral part of a balanced community. c. The site plan has decreased the non-conformity of the existing facility to comply with the current Development Standards. 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable khereto, would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the site is suitable and adequate for the proposed use in development. _ 'Sf PLANNING COMh1ISSM;ON�kSOLUTION NO. i CUP 86-15 - MESSENGERICROWN COACH' October 8, 1986 Page 2 4. That the proposed use wi;1 not have a substantial adverse economic effect on the nearby uses. 5. That Me proposed use complies with each of the applicable ' provisioner of the Industrial Specific Plan and the Development � , Code. SECTION 2:- That this project, together with mitigation measures included n e onditions of Approval, will not create adverse impact on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on October 8 1986. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit 86-1�5 is approved subjectto the fallow ng cork tions: Planning Dtitsion: 1. The proposed loading 'dock shall be screened with a combination of decorative ble-k wall,, mounding and landscaping from Vineyard Avenue. The length of this screen wall along Vineyard Avenue shall be determined by the City Planer. Plans shall hn! submitted for City Plam;er review and approval' prior to issuance f" of building aermits. 2. The gxisting driveway on Ytlieyard Avenue across from the ?' proposed loading dock shall iieLeliminated. Only one driveway k access shall be allowed on Vineyard.Avenue. I 3. Only one driveway access on Arrow Highway shall be allowed. Two 4 of the three existing driveways shall be eliminated. The final design, of the most easterly driveway access sball be submitted for Cii Planner i view and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Straight sidewalk shall be provided along Vineyard Avenue. 5. The existing concrete wall shall be continued along the entire length of the project on Vineyard Avenue.` 6. The developer shall fully improve the driveway access and providing land;-,aping along this driveway acctcs to 9th Street. 7. A six-foot wide landscape planter or a continuous six-foot to eight-foot high block wall shall be provided along the east :property boundary, The entire length of this landscape planter or, block wall shall be from the existing building south to to end of the proposed building (east elevation). 8. Employee outdoor eating area or plaza area shall be provided on the north side of the existing building. Detailed plans shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Planner. z PLANNING COMISS?ON! RESOLUTION NO. CUP 86-15 KSSSENGER/CROWN COACH October 8, 1986 Page 3 sV ' 9. A uniform design of fencing materials (block wall, wrought-iror, and security gates) shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval priori issuance of building pennits. The existing Hain-ling/fence and barbed,wire shah be removed_ and replaced with the approved design oi .;he fencing materials. 10. Ths existing facility shall be upgraded wi;- re-painting the juilding, replacing broken windows and providing roof screens to screen all roof-mounted equipments.` Detailed plans for roof screens shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval i prior to issuance of building permits, 11. The exposed footing of the new building located at the west and south elevations shalt be covered with materials consistent with the architecture to the satisfaction of the. Cl ty Planner. 12. Sfectal landscaping treatment such as mounding, increased number of trees, shrubs);and the size of the trees shall be provided to the west elevation and south elevaion of the new, building to witig4te the visual impact of the exposed footing of the building. / 13. All existing trees shall be saved in place or relocated to a suitable area. Decaying or diseased trees shall be replaced with specimen size trees. Any removal, replacement or relocation -shall require review and approval of a Tree Removal Permit prior to is,_.,�tnce of grading permits,, 14. A six-foot wide landscaped planter shall be provided along the east property boundary for the entire length of the parking area as shown in Exhibit "N". 15. Special landscape treatments such as increased number of trees and shrubs, increased size of trees shall be provided within the setback area along Arrow Highway per City requirements. 16. The double row of specimen size Plum trees shall be continued along the setback area of Vineyard Avenue. 17. A continuous hedgurow to screen parking area :hat fronts on Vineyard Avenue and along south property boundary shall be provided. 18. the developer, applicant or the property owner shall work with the 'adjacent property owner, developer or applicant in mitigating the adverse visual impact of nine feet to twelve feet high retaining wall by providing terraced type planters as shown in Exhibit "G". Detailed plans shall be submitted to the Planaing Division for review and approval prior to issuance of_ grading permits. PLANNING COMISS,,OH RESOLUTION NO. CUP 85-15 _ MESSENGER/CROWN COACH Dc,0ber 8, 1986 Page 4 Engineering Division: 9 g 1. Existing overhead Utilities: a. Vineyard' Avenue _ ;.e existing overhead ` ut es a ec rical except for the 66KV electrical) on the,.-project side of Vineyarr� :Avenue shall be undergrounded frq-_,the first pole on the north side of to the first pole south of the Project boundary, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever„occurs first. Reimbursement of one- half of the adopted cast of undergrounding from future developmed 4s it occurs on*he opposite of the street ;is ,feasible from the pi-esently .Uiideveloped pro, ;ties (minor portion). b. Arrow route - An in-lieu fee as contribution to e u ure undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunication and electrical) on tho opposite side of Arrow Route shall ube paid to the"ity prior to the issuance ` of building permits. The feet, shall be one- hAlf of. the adapted unit amount times the length from the center of Vineyard Avenue to. the east property bouniary (564 feet). c• The existing service to the existing building crossi'dg, Arrow Route shall be undergrounded from the north side of Arrow Route "to .the building prior to atceptar a of public improvements or occupancy whichever occurs first. 2. The pr-;mary access to the site shall be from 9th Street. Reciprocal access easement shall be required prior to issuance of building purmiks. 3. Driveways on Vineyard Avenue: a. Reconstruct the southerly driveway to City Standards (minimum 35 feet in width) including a right-turn pocket (deceleration lane) and post for a no left-turn Canto Vineyard Avenge. b. Remove the northxw ly driveway and replace it with curb, gutter and sidewalk to City Standards. c. Provide striping for back-tn-back left-turn pockets for the new driveway and the existing one to ~she north on the west side of Vineyard { Avenue. PLANNING C IISSION`RESOLUTION-NO. CUP 05-16 -,MESSENGER/CROWN COACH October 8, 1986 Page .5 4. Drivewa s on Arrow Route:, Ii a. Remove the entire cir!uiar driveway including the parking stalls and °epiace with curb, gutter, sidewalk and landsc.ping. b. Reconstrucft the easterly , driveway to City Standards (minimum 35 feet in 1,idth). 5. The curb return at the southeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and Arrow Route, shall be reconstructed in accordance with Exhibit14 The developer shalt bear the costs of relocating the f` trpffic signal required Ly the reconstruction, 6. A temporary drainage swale from the sortheast corner of the site to the northeast corner of 9th Street and Vineyard Avenue or an alternative drainage solution as approved by the City Engineer s::all be constructed prior to occupancy.. A drainage easement shall be obtained prior to issuance of a building permit. 1 F 7. The sidewalk, along Vineyart Avenue shall be 12 feet wide from the existing 12-foot wide sidewalk to the southerly property buundary. AWL AM 8. A lot line adjustment shall be completed prior to issuance of a; building permit to extend the southerly property line more to the south-to include the entire property to be used for the parking lot within the project parcel lines. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 19b6. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: raa -Bu It2r, Deputy Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Comission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly aad regularly introduced, passEic„ and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of October, 1986,' by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ���o�■il��o^.uo ��,..on " `�. �Y .. .� 6h 4 Y009V Y� �Y„V GO GC" O Y yY G �'Oi O. 9yyxxuL •�.pC N NYyy ' � rya "GO ` YG. 6AM 6 0$O.. Y�'o .GlO dppIr g G p�6 G t OP •1.. �- y $.inu.-Z$pp� YYD kYvva��. 'C6 5.+{�€ _�yyyy 4O'..yj �0^Y +.G��yp. ^.Y Np 4j GG6 w.v.�„€•® O Y1y.1 Ct > • a6 R d CaMOy BtlY`l . wr 4a� c`a urux�rNY.. t I y s R--'v ZFF VIM9 $ LM }Ln y..Yv4 P4 YZ.S�. FS Or ee33 Tye �O �wd0 rsY� ma ps i« a " .2 p�p,�� Y Lpp L Nik.9a4i6u�T�� � + ►P]{M+NL Ww� f w ea ,s I I Z9 R ''etc °w^�.. ■cs rno�GG w`o u - .o`a''"n> '°$u N pk y.. O{pj - �Vpp NS Q ®VQw' fY.. LMNUyCQCLy b�- C Oy�9. 0t0 t� _ g w°png ois C'��cP pL ffi.—. cnyy a.�� ��... = =yc• Z s O N V N y Y N +K u y C C€C-MQ ; L C B 30 "g V c�va G O Y V y wt,...$Q. �I-q YES �-�.Y.L ;" ? C 69 15 c L ° O t c Y p C O '� t Y°� Y G 9 . N V :C d. +i0 L �q6 aaG AN YYM ,M OtCro. O O C w -V C VC p. � ,YG1 ��• yR V YC a°a w uy fs v Q� 'wN`9 Y L cg p�qq: ° ..G.$qSq� n. Q piL C gQ 4^ O Q:Y LV�O.aG Q,Gr°� � a,��N4.°� ^NWM • t�1y Bey^g NN.-I -I- =" 9 8� g � Y �Y. Q^N1 9� pLM wp VN 9V pN a N•{ -. NCM{y�^�� 6 y �- •LMa CTC OQUypX ++Y. VM% V ��pG,N 'w 4�y N �QE OA• -.N. • 3 0 Q f G .+v4i{'pb 'oti i N +G a °e�a �o-e.'�� .sir---u- '�.t..f dirtl ug u�� n .-tE 5�!y� 'No c t.s �r w'+�y� - 07� G sc-Q s1$a .G' ulZ ��w all v�S 2sNN�«.G� �u.�' d si'i3$ ns'i u; V) G N 1 '_A Q 2 .y .IQ COM Q l�LS rd G O Y 'i - Ory.G aye p e a Np� :a-Ny..Q QYV p =C V V♦ A1.dG R..sA Li. O AC19 aay11 L ee �O As La 1y6pp NCbC Cpp 6h N=0. ^�.. 0� VJyL p Y �"aL N C Stl •� U �C LPe g y�A C� OE- ypg� y aQ-. Ey{It- Gy 9N VVWw yw Z r ow= _� sYi ^!=',S o+o.Cy� ooa C.+h �! Qi -.ins.lei +ram- N�pA�C Erx y 9M Y nyc C. N Ys M 44 Y Nt B E i V Y -L �Y Y Y G�i N u rn�g =^M W A'_ r.4 '+ o ac N 8 �o N 2' 3 _ Y 4^ mow' .'.PQ 7c;w �ur8oy •+�.oe o. �a-ip Lia` a�- ro.N:c Yi 'on a 7s$. °$ s m u��� � N ��-"'"fit o.`j„ a' 40 p■$ US d_mac 6� ..$ paB �Ny QL73..W9 L i Y G t N i U 01 $W p 1. w A A ;l p p ~G4. N G y p L -GIs .YO y: N. d, �`.q YO eG u Q.+-I CO p C yy o C•CU 01 y d�Gp M=e 'aL ""� yy C C� OpvYL Y �C�p.KQ V1Y6p � p^A ��LC .a ° �= u`a„ v ,^g. w u.+ q,�n R . -4. 5,f.� G WO-L Y. C V i�eEC O1zYC Yfay.b �MOWRrR^O .0 4X., -NG hiMQ 6^hC N+ dG Y. 0 L061 19 w it 2 U4».N CGG�-L 1` F.yY CIS I•'.�Q`66 V '�, aow�. mo a:. ^� au O�oo��uf 44f.V �uea c•- 3f un� r t FO: pa tl OY. CUL ^^y�..LC. Y BEYL NY6� �gg V O� fp OFp Ta 1-0-F � C?ir.T. Y tl� Y ftl9. Gtl O^ =pN U rip. E J.�1YO. O�y PpC a'�a®• ! M l� LO.. O L C a Y C g C O N N��G> A a-y`o , 5 q u w L oC iyy 8 - f Y J `L y tl d•f x. tl f Y ^y q M 2. 7L` U A 4'O w.O � �^- r c LM tltl YN �' C f� �yqay • yNM: CC tl f ``Y� _ _Q O�Y N�NN� O �fU G . r S . y v�+.a$' tl u cT. N y r .O`.` VGN T.l EM:1 �^ Y.6gUQ�:O pNNQ�# rQM�.� -24 - C^ qCC �lpA V YLN fJEp q JYM yp ON . i C p M Y w ^Y p. Q.. C CG OC Yo ANg O ^ QN OGb aN{t'pp�QQl CYyOf M-C. L Pg dOlQzi f �C y 01 �tl� i N iy.6® � .Y y f y.y N��yy}�. _i p Y f N • `O O N C NV.� ^. OY� MPI q. �_Oyr. YG14 LAC CQ�■6 ppM6,N. 9st >.r iQ N -Sals F C f : ti w O j L Z s "Qy�' 7i.�N"a'7Ag `oA at�g.. �fa Elebbll.ala d ¢f a�i.o Q� n 34-. '4`. ^§e■ry y3N ry WQI 1 N � Y 6 yg� UN'Y^ §iY� NSA rVY CCC YfOO V. Y �,.2%sz 6 ;= K.N =N� ISMS. RN u�•r wa OFw•Ttl r<f� �KV Y.0�6p- l� -AGYQ1 ' ` , G.A ♦1 l:� Ss O'My `.a 'oa z n ` N` o _ og �- getlin ..D AL Da pU0 1.> y. r 1 tl 'U^G N.Y.+ Q _ro O•N�+ Y at a— H q$ IL zz j a+Y Qx f f D+ M Q U O r9 V rl: Mo tl dr. e-v-OA Q e. CY� .is tltlTf q U 4 N Dy r OM: _IL a.I Cp VG• TsLS. y X—ee AT 4. YpC YBGO �".� y _ 9.V Ya • AZ Y_=OCn � Qt�O+ rfp ��`a 8pgyyy�gx 6>,6N d _jog' tlQ N.i 4Y fy� OI� yy`tlY �/�y�...�ypM OIO�. p� q Nam. NC OML �OCC �2 aUgCNC OO+fp CCb U. s9 p Y Ltl�� '� par Ja �G GZ Oytl Yay G .r�s0 ro sa^ T y(�_ - =N r3 HVY4N. LO Ntz Y �a'O VLF. L �■� YO �4YYQ!{�{..� �Oa tl98*L. <�w0 <n�m � 49N H6 4 t/ 69 �OM�A i0� <M�G� WC6r N'N Yo. i (1I e a• 7 g��w .C-..0. n.?CA N14 r. Y� 6 G 9p ! � S r �•u OOY Or _OOad Yw .�• Oa V 1tM c'� 9 �^ yWt06 V�� �pW1Y �>pr= �YLI � �YC6 wiNq @O��a. • L.O ppq ViW `74it`� 4�� rOOLY t 6. Y.� 0000Y j'O yy? + 6N Y Div NY$■ w GC Q3 NL`O _ 'V O.L y �� w V �06 V Y'C L• �C 4 u d pppG.N V <I u u fi O C q� O o Y 2= gCG ? .� �i0y. p�uZ vy.�� -� 7..6 V Y� �:•_'i •06 `CY �iu1. r •pV qYN U qw _ dd�Vdqq YNC Y� 525 <I OIL d: Oa� OGpgO r'.L AC6uuo .s�yC1�,yt YCOG. 1 �. ® uGY ■O 'n N�.L qx d Vgp O S Y V QjQj� y G 6C9—Y g�� CL^ $ aA w tl YVVW �L�u^6 a �Y. 9.V p'T T V r O ^ p Y O Y «V. 4 Ltl�i YCy{`. VOY W �ww Y O Ji O O•' L U L r.0V p L N 1Oy Y A tl'� :� �O Y. p Y�O. wCw GYYCYY fOt CI yF.UR po yypyil AA�/ w �L L q< eo o$gYa Y u w Yc �'d�Y3 .Z-4 yy■■ yyC ■y ..V.� .� 1.i O••C CI AY O V H N S�wzs. GAYp r�U 9ya1 N,a VNii 1��`LK�pf �l V VYC ,OC•Nw r YC9 •�.I.OM: 3 L1LN.K.. �9.�Y 10 I�(.iWL S 1%- YOB •�� A Y .C S C cq nil Y9d a'.frl a4 � :�'. .ci . ola dreg c. 72 .$�. N a. a is is C2'z` { Wy d C s9 .�� LYE q^ Y G C •ter, 4S • VO ��+ M Y'� G�y YaC NV 0t O CCcpp _^CC,• r 55 Y ZLrN n�c 3•.. + nO1N '-..uir v pa dcro Fci,q �r aS �Y YL tL L�. T G �C .0 l �V�C •N+L'. YO N` Oy.� q Ij C LO� C�`a 6C� V� L�L Ol Dy .. LLVCC �O� OIGQ! VO aVi 3:�^V rLi r ` w0 L{Y1 w' ± C6•L. "01Mgj 43 wU O r O C GO V.Sw a�Cw.Ytl. P ocdams. c= c$ Suw �tl�m 9 qC0 L N.O V'=w rC= u9.t; OI LB. Ocyl � {�•.tl On'� FEU Nw C® L G '_ �6C6C O'�i �O�N. "CiL WQ7 6W. �N.a N l3�J•.•. ..i LYw a,' �..�.. C1Y1 OYN� Y ' III 1MN 7C yy `gym s c m �p ioYr � N y c n` Y :Sao S >C'w� a ye a ffi g Y4M�`O y to ` L� yCJ iN•� P p' ova :.E... • Y NM p�q �N � 7 C pp2 Wd. 14• =� .�Ypp o';2 CY�:MN. �gq�ga CC CC CCf Aa �:. oYy �.- � Sm tl p N aa{{'' s�• �q{ 6 CY ya y. L p C 4 O •. G Otlg♦Y my rw ZN CYG4 W J.. may. `CC� C �C.s t,CC 0Ipy. � �`9Y.. L.Y`. C' ri' dN, qm L Mp0 V �� CC T i1. �wO�.' yMOr C6Yy m$' y G .enY'gii C Nl 4 o Zo TO LV Q ue ���. C'Q. aO'. ✓` C ^, N.G°-� CN�yM pa® � ^V C y C =C 'a T wa 66 ^ NLY� dpMR Laa Yo a :E _3%i 'v� a" a+ m cY• N` mMc "d ty, Y a .$ y .IG L4� GY dr. tQ d•� is aYPY � 6 y GS •�.., IL Bw:AhL� Y. �yyV LY. A Of ,y Y v. pp p�q° +..Y. 3 YppO�1�� YO? �ONSYwC ��Y Y U6 s• - WNv W V6/ �6 O-5G= • f; -C 6 6w r0' S IO O Y C�.w.N L yy .0 Y II N.i• Y T TO.�V NY.. >�L � O `O`C,]O� .Yi � l:11+• p.: M O�i. Y M pw L ✓ w -.� P II L Y _^ � II C y U N N wuC pOy/SW ZS O CVC p. • 6 M N 0 N W .r. A el Cy1 & C y= y S w.O u Y z. II ~ Z 'ACS et 41 sag '^w' gd xc: L KYa "E ` • = �Y y.� 01„. 29 " YY 8 .••OW pC Y+`� ' o y 0. Cq`�YC y` y.-e ^ Yp M420,C Y N� CQ �.. aY 4 .�I �y! MO gLg C tW%z OII aL Yh YL 4L + 3 �i l a IIi Ya 6v 6 w + AN O E � L off. ae � 3�' �E�^ $.•c.: Qw a i _ &GY{� p@� O N L Y V w N C 1�L'q N C OY C L l O L q w Z Z G L Y c. O Y ? � Y p Y IIo ^o w L u AY�1^.M ■r I Nam. �`Yily £� .Cq.VY VL$W �` ei"n: �� � �� W: 0��1. e,ra ��. .maw`.'+ Ye vl'Ii ► v`6ie`:dffi <a s'= :S'm.LYLg'.wug LII` Kdv cNulo. ea K» 4 N"t oY Y p viiiigiiii� Y,.d `A ^ �p Lg of �QN $Y a. \\ mK \ .�` 7N or wo `�1 '� 'ffa w"' $ ti� 1 � �J�"•� �o a.�2L'n= ate, Mu V` 2-1 xC cyaF Yr L1� YgYT SY`p+€ d Y y•p L �. $.O M ' L r4 Y �y Z. S i " N■. N WB 6 P W Lp y t N M �. tJ yT ep Z w^5 b S _�� a¢^_ '•. «�� �a"i1co Yam` V� C W a•Lt• 3. a.�. wL w41y C K..L . ^ m 01 N w1 ZY N� W••••��RRRRee C 3 �I s < a 0 L 4 E h 1 CCO� � yCC' Y a�CN a G p. ._ Cam- tlY epi Y. `■q`yYU Lt^- ) y Yy N M 1�1 ^VY Ca L u d �aPn. 1%aN ►qo. �N al + of �+o` r' o e aom o a.. kab g- E O b�1 72. `O goo L G.tlO `•��'O C y Y N tl LL N O 6 r E. to �Y�L Ew9X .0 L o L .S'L g' gQ. $ p�.x a -YES OOLLY-� 8 �Yu. � �$ un TNY YMo `dtlo 0 =Ye` to a y $� OCa Mw L¢¢nnM Y�+�1�y1 �a Yyyy■...qb M. L YCO a04L GO Y- 01 L«jam. L� O aO O:M 4`,CO Y�Y S� V � V p ••pp Yy pp pp ±± q YO L OeYY.•9Y +t'rf^ w- O Oyy.Ci! iN C dY ^C .y6 C O VS LaY:= Sj� �NDC .bCCC 6� LO.Y1S7 66. H�- �Cj� �OOUC yyY .. V6Y LW 6w KD SN�.N ` � 6J41 a 29Y. F+2. 9 d C RESOLUTION NO. - A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO,' 'JCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION - APPROVING MODIFICATION TO_' DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86-13 REGARDING PHA T_ III OF THE WASTER PLAN LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF 9TH STREET AND VINEYARD AVENUE IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL/RAIL_SERVED DISTRICT (SUBAREA 2) OF T% "INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN i . WHEREAS, on the 29th slay of August, 1986;--a complete application was filed by Messenger'Investlent Company for the -review of the above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the `24th dkv_af September, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning, Commission held;a. rjeeting to consider the above-described project and continued to October 8, 1 6 regular meeting at the request of the applicant:; and WHEREAS, on the 8th dry of October, 1986, the Rancho Cucank;nga Planning Commission 'held a public hearing to consider the above-described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: t SECTION 1 : That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed modification to Phase III of the Master Plan is consistent with the objectives of tilo; General Plan; and; 2. That the proposed„ use is in accord with the objectives of the Industrial Specific Plan and :ne purposes of the district in v,iich the site is 1ocatod; and, 3. That the proposed modification to the Phase III of the ;;aster Plan is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and, 4. That the proposed use, together with conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public healtby, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or Improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That this projact will not create adverse impacts on the environmen�d-that a Negative Declaratior has been issued for the Master { Plan (DR 86-13) on July 23, 1986. SECTION 3: That. Deve'.opment Review-86-13 codification is approved subject to-TtFe-ToM owing conditions and attached Standard Conditions: 1� I I PLANNINGor it s�`1d R soLUTfON NO. ' OR 86-13 - MOOIFICAT1'04 - MESSENGER October U, 1986 ; J' - Page 2Ask 5 Planning Division: 1. The proposed Phase III aeveionment, argyle approving concept only.. Future:%development shall be subject to Development/Design Review � •, process for Planning Commission approval. 2. All c=n tions contained withir Resolutions 86-1IO shall apply. M \ 3. The davieia er, applicant, or the property owner shall work with 1r. - the adiacen* property owner, developer, ors applicant in mitigating the: adverse visual impact of the nine foot-;to twelve foot high retaining wall by providing terraced type of planters r. as shorn in Exhibit -G" of CUP 86-15 , Detailed plans shali'l be;,;,/, submitted .to the Planning 51vision for review Wd-approval prior f to issuance of grading permfts'for-NPhase II development of DR 86- s 13. v APPROVED ANU ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF OCTOEER,. 1986, PLAN!'I;NG COMMISSIOR OF THE CITY OF RANCHO'CUCAMONGA i `. BY -y—n r—.- 0,, Chcirman �r ATTEST: _ ra q] erg epu y Secretary � I, Brad Buller, Dnuty Secretary- of the Planning Commission of the City of - l Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and -' regularly intra^uceU, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of October, 1986, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: CMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:' it 1 CITY OF RANCHO UCAM(-XGA STAFF h,,jP'0R>!. 1 r DATE: November 12, 1986 1977 1 r TO: chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY Nancy Fong, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY QWRT _u - - he request to -amend the lerra vista Planned Communiv by establishing a business park overlaying zone for areas designated as Office Park, Commercial and Mixed Use, within the Cori6unity Plan boundary. I. ABSiRA.,CT: Lewis Homes has submitted a revised list of proposed uses for—the Business Park overlay zone. Staff is requesting for a continuation of this item to the December 10, 1986 regular Planning Commission Meeting. The purpose is to allow Staff sufficient time to review the latest revision to the proposed Land Use AmE�'9ent and to report back to the Planning Commission. II. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission on October 8, 1986, continued this proposed Planned Community Amendment to this regular meeting, at the request of the applicant. The developer requested the continuation so that they could wrk wit'.-.staff in developing a more appropriate La!:l Use within the ;irop,.rsed Business Park overlay I zone, that complies with�;.the intent rV the Terra Vista Planned 11 Community and the General Plan. Staff has met with the developer on two occassions to discuss tte issues of land use. The developer is diligently working to revise the list _of land use, $eing- proposed for the business Park overlay Zrde. Attached fa, `your review is a letter from the developer 'indicating their intent. Also a copy of the latest revision to the Planned Community amendment has been included in this report for your Information. r C III. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue _ is item to the December 0, 1986 regular Planning Commission meet.*rig. r ITEM F 5 Chairman and Members of ibe Planning Commission November 12, 1986 PCA 86-D2 ' Page 2 Res Ily to l l er r r City Planner: f. e BB:NF:vc Attachmen�,s• Letter from the Developer Proposed; text from ;-lewis Homes for Business Park ®verLay Zone (third revision) s +r 1 > A \� _i t WsIA November 5,,198611)`Z13j4)$P1 - AELIVM By MESSENGER ; Planning.Division City of,Rancho Cucamonga , 9320-0'Base Sane Road Rancho Cucamcnga, CA 91730 ATTENTION; Nancy Fong r a't1B7ECI: Terra, Vista Planned Comw'snit•a Amendment 8E-02 J, Terra Vista Business P,* Dear Nancy: W Enclosed are three copies tf our revised tent for Amendment No. 3 to � the Tema Vista Community *,an, dA#1;Lnc4 with the Business Park overlay t " Zone. We have substantiail}i`rayssvZ_- he list of permitted uses=.in. response to the comments we deceived fxom Brad, Dan, and yourself. Specifically, the us.�4Idealihcj with assembly and fa)•-,i.cation of products p` have been elimialated, with s -'bs of those, product4.,,,acorporated as a permitted: use .in the '"small business c ,egory; ar6 the 7ategory of uses "- dealing with artisans and craf imen has beei redefined in an attempt to s` clarify our intent. Ile sincerely hope that these changds, and other minor madifioations (such as prohibiting contractnrg", ,­Xd_)., will al.ow staff to now support this project. We are anxious to have this project rs,vie..,:cl by thG Planning Commission at the earliest pcsstble time, and we az:e equally'amdous that the staff report which the Planning Commission will r-ceive in rdmice of its meeting reflect this nEw material rather tha, the amendment language r that staff found so objectionable. Therefore,, if there is any way that your staff report can be re-written i!.'time for inclusion j.n the Planning Commission packets being prepared this week, we would liko the new language reviewed by the-Planning Commission on November 12 as scheduled, We- realize that this may invava extra effort on your part,-and will be very �. appreciative if you can manage it.. However, if there is nc way to have a new staff -eport rp;.ay for the Planning Commissioners' packets this week, we request'a'continuance to the next meeting, which we understand will be oh December 10. tT=6"d hU a..A,e PO 8rx$70 41Gr3r^: '.;A 4�'3i 714)989-09 t t -.. Ms. Nancy Fong city of Ranchr;Cucamonga �. November 5, 1986 rage 2 APB �$ 3. a Thank yota very mach for your assistarce and cooperation. Cordimily, lj WESTERN PROPERTIP4-i 'ray Nat).ock Project Manger tic.(3) E f f 't r, � 4t m 2 cr! 9 CL ED O Ov L- s LU t!! u to C \ t' D> C rr W :� o W � w i uj Ask tr v') ". 00 ;1 Fv $ .. _ W o d L Zi apC V1 -y CO ar as �,.. . C� a »N _ E in i2 L. C ul m ul a+■ V� e Cp. Co m v � Ol 3 0) of C 07 to u1 plop L. > _C d C.:— O' 7`af+. C. N' 'O. U.,�' ty...d O 'c'p — f0 n Q. l0 �I ITL.. CT'd C,C 3 c Yp O 6 'a LAV M O L d`o uc _V i+ O L — t s. � e U.�, rQ ayi Nui L= 3m aLi � O o O oMd3 M f0.� L SO So- Iq CD L to E cm CC)a a MD O P7.N d L C. 3.L w O H a d..V tdJ d V V4 .-7.7 IC. C 01 Vl y... — o'er �+�" f0 d 3 C a+ L..�. �,: L 3 - cr O Q 8 O C.O r N Ct fJ Vui 2 C w d. 'L .�0 W'd: E y. N. Ir Qf O C F CIA (71 E. v OaUOC�Wu.ln_ N o A.u�u9G0� Ew ;ram C a d G 16 �+ 3 tN 41 C to' 1 r etl. to +,a O to C L C7'C M ul. C-4 O N d �E IS 4"4- y � M m of�oE O Cl�00 — � c y •C O = C In to O O 0— ML — — ,no) `c Y to C�1 d .L1 L G.O N 'p Tl ;^ 3 O N > �47 tft th in 3 d " G N Q O Y a. roCNLdpxL VlY L. Lrc ♦ IL al SQL 4 � y cc e,C� v � d d y G u tp yl d_to L p V.- C tll C N C yd ro. CO3 >C.%aO`i-'a�Cro 'nc�oj 3 3O7m > :3m��0V)-'v 'E Xd G `� URN+ �0 O d m E a ry o L�" a aIn Cl m rc ,`� > s. ,^ or„ �ti Cc Hoyt' > W G md�.5 •m .L. cc wamd .1 C ;�� +' NIn H a E ro 3 L d17 a �d E ate.+: C� C d d d _ .r o0 3 coL... d.. w �? C � o1 Cf° > +Qcc Cs �a N O u3ulCrtuCtlg( m mco w;�.+ > � �w.L � dc•� Ica ov < ` c c¢w� u1�- 3 5 'D O*M .y t L C d rn C O 3 F"4. fll t O O E'O L. N a.+ LL. N F-y-. ro tn >U O S C A H e G U C 3 �"•a« L• co L t A in vi y av C d 4/ M ,e. tt7 L m in a d C� O '7 �, a N.7 O.. w m y °aA+.�3 in ,� 10 4 Z L O L •C CS.0 Q9 C.e tow- N C. If. ej e 0 `1 m Lio ro V in 7 �"YOrc � ? .r im 013 m v c�a o•LQ. ` a t: = v r� a�aw s L- o•� va as a. IlL in �+ N 7 tn U.0CCL a. m vmm Nc c pro iv e a•g L'. IVE V M E.M L.ai C. ogro �� o Up p � rota c w n a N U ¢ 0 OU._ 0:1, m occN m •ptm� •�. - -0 -0 a t N L. �p V 4) p p E.Ai tn y G e, N.L U O daC i - Sm r 4- Q. a ' z_ p N u O mOC— L•Q L y NL o"o L CD N 0.2 3 I1- C.2 L7 tnH % U +p+C,aC mNCC `ANC. N p�' h L N .`°:`O.LO,u V y.V m C C m L :O^3 L N d U N_.4, M L N 5—=.V 7 m �tamu tj U a`aa3'•- UC V)0O S. E n N ro to c C.C. N U to y U N C mfl.Qx ^ ed N M 'nnL LIM •� roOO� Nw tr E Ccm rom aci w % OaoNd� aVi �� �~ a°i ro N N7 CC L ro NMa L N V L L L t C.Nn Ep.L+ �..N.•�• :n y N ro X .N N 'y o lCq—d N U O Ll!fl L O N Lq L.M y Q L9 C C.N 3 w N L. m C L. O A. Ln 7 t0 j„ ro Q1t►. H 01e L U C.Qa 0 Et p Ca `�io ro a p e MGd c �srp0 u L � C° aiCL �C vie MN0NNa,.a oa'� LL.. �� LetUL EN °'e (�7LCl R EM �aaCC Aa61 .= G 77 y 3m ov L ��'aZN+.N' ,,a�:: � �cccao �� �,� oai'mow .A ° N n c.� °;3u�aCtJU3 c? 4,,CLU_� � � N �L.;n a GCiN ;Ul� E a ° o-a c m i Lm�o.E mE.Uf• O - �. ,C.NNNU"NmYyNC•NtoN — -- CITY OF RANCI10 CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 12, 1986 >r Qy z R TO: Chairman and Members of the P1an�,ing Commission 1977 FROM: Brad Buller, City P?anner ! i}J BY: Chris Westman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 86-17,11- GENERAL TELEPHONE - A proposal to locate a 665 sqq,-are toot unmanne remote snitching station north of Nigl land and east of Milliken APN 225-141-29. f� I. PROJECT AND SITE 0MRIPTION: (' A. Action Requested: Approval of a Conditional Use Permit and issuance of a Ne4ative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North Caryn Planned Community, South - Caryn-Planned Community East - Caryn Planned Community West Caryn Planned Community C. General Plan Designations: Project Site Low Residential (L), (2-4 du/ac) North Low Residential (L), (2-4 dul'ac) South - Low Residential (L), (2-4 dui*ac) East - Low Residential (L), (2-4 du/at) West Low Residential (L), 12-4 du/acy D. Site Characteristics: The site is presently vacant aid_ surrounded y e recen ly annexed Caryn °tanned Community. Directly to the south of the project site is the Cal Trans right-of-way for the proposed Foothill Freeway. II. BACKGROUND: This project was continued from 'the October 8 Planning Commission meeting, at the request of the applicant for the purpose of resolving a deed restriction interpretation. As of yet, an agreement has not been reached by the involved i parties., However, the applicant wishes to proceed with the request and resolve the deed restriction at a later tine. It should be noted by the Commission that review of this project � can proceed as a land use issue and that the interpretation of the deed restriction is a civil matter to be determined by the parties involved: J ITEM li PLANNING COWISSIOW STAFF``REPORT November 12, 1986 CUP 86-17" ', General Telephone Page 2 Additional concerns raised by the Traffic Safety Division regarding the proposed foothill Freeway and an .off-rnmp location, in .relat;;on to the proposed switching 'station have been resolves) to (:'te satisfaction of Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer. III. ANALYSIS: A. General: The intent of the proposal is to provide telephoap service for the Carun Planned Community, General Telephone will lease tha site from the property oh;ter: dhe Archdioces of San Bernardino County. The development of unmanned switching stations is not unusual for residential areas, however, design is an issue in that it must be compatible with the surrounding uses. S. Design Committee: The Design Review Committee has reviewedthis project and reconerded approval subject to the followings 1:. The roof should be changed to a hip roof with tile material (see Exhibit "C") 2. A minimum of 2 tree wells should be p,`ovi ded along the inside of the southerly block wall because of its high visibility frcm the future freeway (sere Exhibit "B„). C. Technical Review Committee: An access agreement has been reac a wftff—the owners`"of the property to at1ow General Telephone to have access from Milliken to thj proposed switching station ,site via an approximately 39V moot driva aisle. A letter -From the Archdiocese also states that access shall be re-rooted at a 'later dale when and if development occurs on the property. A Cal Trans agreemer±t ftr access into the freeway right-of-way has been discussed and shall be submitted prior to grading permits as required by the Engineering Division. D. Environmental Ausessment: Parts I and II of the Initial Study Tia`ve ee�6 n cumplae an taff has con::luded that thtwre are no significant environmental impacts rented to the use, 111. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code. The proposed use together ;> with the recommended conditions of approval will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or, mate-ially injuriou to prererties or improve►Bnts in the, area. _ {✓ PLAhkdING Ct !hSQN STAB YREPORT November 12y 1386 / CUP :86-17 General: Telephone Page �r IV,' ►CORRESPONDENCE:- iiom has been'advertised as,a,public hearing " e �� i ,e"p��r_t i�er+;spaper, the property posted and notices sent f to mT9"".ropg�rt -nets ►thin 300' of t_?w pr*ct- i� V. RECO NDATFON. , Staff recommends that thr ;glanniog Commission ssue =a 'Aegatj,ve neilaratiAn and a�srove Conditional Use ' Permit 86-17 through adoption of the attached Resolution and t Conditiont of,Approval. ` Res ruby y l� ull r — - �; City planner BB•CW;dak » Attachmzits Exhibit "A - Location Map.,Cerym Pla ned Conw,pity Phase,1- Site Pier►` ` EzhSit Elevations l n Fa bit"' `- Grading Plan Letter from Archdiocese Resolution of kpproval with Conditions yr L l i �h � _u,. sue,;..:•L� �,✓'�_ y :, w r# Y I OlI pYTJ �• FJ>��M{.RY(• 'h1 AV 1,hf�My y.I�M _ `+�. ..ors` •A �l �'a�1�p �_ ....1 frscsweo II..w s..r�.w) t 14 ta CPIN a,� NORTH CITY QFLjndMMJCF 1TE1� _. '�' �'•�7 RANUHO CUCA.N40NT-A TITLE-CAC6±4 PLANNflNG UIVISM IAHIBrr. A_-Scti-,E: Ir s '�• r* Pm.ae 1 1 � r �' Ywoh'Ns�ea T5c4wM. i NORTH crry or, ITENis PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT...._*'27 � .r • I. EILV,�TdN ' r JI • r ' court•elxe wtJ CLEV''nON 6LE�/HTIOt.l3 a_ti. k4f.J NORTH r � I CITY Or ITEM: RAl\TCHO CUCAtiIO'.\YGA TITLE �11 "Rd S PLANNING DIVISION EO:HII31T. SCALE- t'36 i s 9£3 z r 'o.N LSxHI ii ' 17 lot It I xOrILI ! d �! CL I r 1 lhioa f"lu'1IZ -9 io=f September 2, 1986 2 _ Ms. Barbara, Krall _. City of R;.ncho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RB: Roman CatholLr Bishop of San Bernardino Property it Highland and Milliken -Parcel #225-141-29 , Dear Ms. lirall At the present time the Roman Catholic Bishop is negrkt;i-- ating with GTE for the purpose of giving GTE an ease- ment for ingress and egress to the property from Milliken avenue. The location:-of the driveway" ,,orld be { at the most southern and western point of the parcel.. MF When and it, however, the property is developed GTE will no longer be allowed to use the above located driveway and at teat time will be^given ingress and egress rights in another area which is suitable to bath the Roman Catholic BiLlhop and the City of Rancha Cucamonga. The contents of this letter shall be made a part of any escrow agreement should in the future the Roman Catholic Bishop decide to sell sub-act property. + Sincerely, , � r71 Deacon eor e M. S chmit Busine s Mar- .r GMS:eit f i - 1450 ".J�'y'stuxt, ,San 2,um4ina, 6141 0%.ia 92405 17141 889-835i M� drAiVOy Yi.i CCO� A Q� .w" .. �`' tlq.Y.V N O6 e'�YC Y r.�YO tii O >r Y Qn V +CY=Y y, O�Y�CCCLy 6.aY tl it pa+yC pp � 4 VM `iQ yO.G O.yO�N. €•Y�•.YyYeY wow asy� _ Y o O QpQp CS YtYMy�D+„x'�y: @qp�.r. TC C V Ci tl$ f%Y Y,0��L gg p y p. Y T 1"C�N �p Cit- �Cg"'�'Y.}� ,-yh' g i L�'a `�"..oM_ L. pis «Wll jr> �1: v 2 »p�sE..'S`o« ¢gtY� 'has 'x 4cos S «�'a !!$II� •J a �} -8€1E$,3.,-R3 .-,A R` O Z Ay Via. ! O ' Om o L`Qo;Ysu6sit g1 �Y� pyi. �a Ny Y.> C g�O p�.Vtl . ►. o»ap>�o�+ F$aa» u» a. .p. »$ a�l'3 »HE15. 1 ` N BE � ; 5.13 Y >p W �vpp«i.it L~L Sa {.•O C 2 11YO = C`C �9S YoV spa Z. � �� •�C����:N�� V. V ? w rj » N rd qO Gg y. v o >I e'¢ e o == YM01 - i N®yO��d �". G�8 sH ' C �.occ uvc^�' c>. o=coveyy ZZ 42,E BE c' `a`v`e Yp c sr. YYOt� $� ra .cttv; ,gotR $"2 ouLIoQYC-t 4YYc' p EU c�$ or$aa• p� i� cy`O YN �. Oe aC Yi�Z�.Dw yGyL �MiL� p `.1t�a.'.4 Ca Zr GOcML tS��Y Q�L�'� y Zf 'eC=^ �YMy. V _ V �^O VV C O �• c N va a p� a M ` S sa 6 a .}35= V: � 9�Oal��.�V. L y p M a a C��a a— — F•�`� ��r�r~O� +�� �+ �w v o N� 8`g ■yBu+ ,$a�a� `�rno a c�+ltpµ g,yc r LA OZSNaL��•..p .-Y=Y'aa. 25 c$ =^Cn _ M— PCV CY VY�a fib�LM1`. p If �gw� 3 3 �r �r1�� <i�� � 3t�wM�SEa».3 a3� °=s etie«]3 u t N d `o � �L r 2' �g5 s3 b'w�u�� ►s $ = atiuv • �� Y i'� i+a y � NL. Yy C ya�ar jib Y�y� p 4L' egg :os a s rbVCaOMV£ �a >Q� 'S¢.2 pNM ♦ S. X :�_ � py qp tJ C '•��.wY �^. —yr. ham` � wh ��C V�O. +��' v6 CO yC`�Y `$ oya `o �8a.R 'v o�+c v� S$�i. �i p+ �_n�i �a�va� aY ^3 ov`� �•�ia�+-. �S}' }':JCL - &= E v Z aga�aap gam= �. += yo Y+r yu-a "a' Ilia oTv$�a vYp;MQ� � as, �;S 9�,aC 7YS c �S Y =9 9�L rs.Oj •0�..''S A. 0 l — M YA S` V.yO o. gEva C v +iE+Llla�9'Y p O.C .1 p04YQ { Q�n.a V a.+ .C Y A 4Y Ott�.Op Y J. pQ up u O S C i.. J�Gp4 d `T r.V Y x.+��g1t 1�0L6 `NG MIL MO K�sVia j 7 �0 ' : a'o i' Mo c. ^r a< eLLYc� W>.w a. � eidbu b �� M. COY. 4E COOv0.691C�b^T 4. w p�j KSaC4 `C yLj. rO r� wy N:q LAY' qwd y M CgY�V ' Lp � Y Y Y wrr C `tli1 w a b p a yap wt E w-0.. Npy+ 4.. A tib a. �7Yr lTY C. a CpCE.Y. Ina1. Naq pYN w.. +4N C ~LMbC N �YaYpyE �L ay{�r...�L� EV yY CN Oy Y aL'LJ N� 3i C+{ qd r L L ate." b •:�po �st a Ya,+a$' ,�..� •r''u+p"�`t�'^.a�'�N^ � f� ��`w per$ da��` CWSi ��'' yMM Wr6 �N pL P'Sm S�E�Y .� N4 ��a' MNI f7i':yg . Yr <k .aaiai $3 rNL i C'. 1. GS rw �.zb TW"9 is C� Nam. L u q`.R 4,E. 4�: KOly jAaiaq YC` �4sya edLa n Ya> a $ b Ks yas � 'gc 9t- ; ap( �y cC¢e� _ q" ba.'.� a��r'gb L d 84■ N r.gR� all a.p■= ■ �ML A9 u. {O� CC VMC C4 LY MY'{ Zy tdRF� O L+:- C�jC Y ^ Y R w•�. �t Q. 4. b SL y t!r•^. Bpi R1� a �.al S� CQp�r eMD'..N tl` �v�.`.W yE v.C`vy ga 'O w g � w � 5a '� tl� es•'S t^x -tl� p r C�Sp 5 p� Y O bNp Lb w 3�6u yyp �V\.�6p WyEL ti. rpnw� � �O bgY'�� �M/aa�Mra b waa a Lc� S we0 p4V_ ay L` IIs N AWL aWav aYi�G w M-�v. b p L aava a 4 Y 1Cf> -oL4.y�gpp L SO C KN4'i W4 GM Vial hp. � C_.61 C•C OLUY:. CC. r Gam« h�A. V.-.OV aC T qro ' g'C GA6 3`tpi` dtYC .~i 0'ZC tl'c=c`u _ ~ M.V O��' 9yY 66�Dpsp CV =Y0 tl9.YLY y.V Np. a Ask � ' iSSSSSSC tlNY N+C g30O =ytn VC= VT. Q '• Is: ail uwo �y« .. _g! u.�a r; 4�%,'stl o•.Y.rS..ei ® b` row .�Y.'•ci^S SEZ '�dg `o�-L� o ^,l�,nr �«'0.�• `0�37� g �g ay«4 «e■we TOO pY � �^4n� u �rC wyM YOy��CY NYC Y pqC�ppppJJ C �Oa•�o �yYy n�d s, SC V.pL� a•r+ yy9 pLAv +M•VN sNi� s b-a-Z wMC YN �O�!(�'+.�_ aGY4 vb �m{�L� at4.0 �a`•� aN..AyW war .. daa.N•NCLA OY..YOy>a1 •iIr N�6pp - �pG{pYfbp� `�yC AU �F�Op.�•`w�. i L tiY' t q9:A F=•<pM Y4`WN/.} ��r11 I�YWL 0.i 60J-2 E�'yfYC. ^Yy qw •d o «mom �tl ro= u � Y a�G T�. 3 N.0 •,q� Otero. 4 I Y F �u. Q�.� 5 V� �..' y �` yr dpu $ y 4Q uyS L�O � w N.`• G •a.,•btl� .+.0 YPR �40 Y y G.4 O!• � `•y ^`•>^ q y Y .• 4 }•r.as QNr _r sa ^d �Lcgi� u� �µw d a 9,2 4yy g 8yi���3— $rho Y y -Yw tU � a O tl 4 A N> � .AY O,� CL ` �Y•. M +�G v V LCy p NN � YpL, N`-L•. a Y �..0 L� y ay YGp+c dl 1Ay�N.•r L i ptlpY • Y.q eY WaY O N �L�� .'G� CaY 2& O Oa> ~Gy a rit La9v � tl�«~!^ YO• CLt LY. ,6'•YC O..p r� 4 d' w N 6 O N V C CC r «q a NL4 tl M� L.�_ O6 bVN �YIr04 t O.=L ro + .. ow g�..u w p q-,� tl^ Y Y b L �=C ! Nwy 11 AV p W G G=tl^ Y10 � L GGq P �� •' ©M SO.=� u 6�SI.W�.M4 f. o=q pyYY• Cs. =OO sv9Y N � � 9P�0 L GG•^• Y911�. L �� LGaN L � gp. F r a: L — c cne nc ob:N �g .S L>i`iE Nc u.. v+N. s++�+• Je.+e.- d r4_w_ <a ouN— u WY.. WQa a.W— j y u .......... . 1, "f 88= Asg B O r u $ern =y Vz as � N� ze kil o'� .iys n$a�! Sao ohs s of T� q w.o� � tef ccc43333~C g N e�' :S a »5-1 Y y v e i TH to a4aii �La i 33nLu n`•`� pC' OC ICY C OS. C a. Cam Y� a_a. q� b e`s .. 9 f Y.Y1 $. a r 'uhs��6n Y� Ca■.9.eJ ue9C9 T �pC LIL Y.a==iGO. 6 L Y +yaaa�Ms. =v .yQ a 7 rmr ..� A + YuA p r_N� aw c �� c FVY3``N Y �$ G aT n +O M bt7q 6V YL a' tY$. y =t�e+i.yyym+y_ u ♦. owe.; `spa ` .=... �� ,o �Q^H� o.wq as2L Y+��� "' vs •Y•` •' �:r. ie. �� rnE. N ruSow .nA3 S 6` PP+L r0 �C 9 a Y .. L1.NV WY4 76 i»65.. Cu �It LOIY O 0.5 1. L � 9 $�a ag 'v- S tl v, Rio I t& M�=+Y�` c �$: s: a�y' <i. z^ -:r N AS a a �CQCO � CJ O.CY L G� `H YY�... •t�N L.N, ar0 C .2 LL pVG� CV � �' L S ,� P 46 ` YY O.i fi N a U Y L 0 O Y y O gL.p • a y Ji Ya �pl..y AM - TF .� �tl '� �'•N VW .G 6n <n C ear L a `o . 8� g V 'v use tlSE Sp 1�12 Z- .6. efi .X Zug Ed pa 3 .•..".3 c$ - y _ p kit O■ .C. �O�.y� Wg L` OCOY q Ypa■O� `� �s �C 8�fi rO® � .N� �� p�u " YLu6n •�M i ip YrY G6 CppCpQ Cp ur- a w:; Lfi$Yp�a y N L p�. K U _�r 0.NS3 0'.6 5.a�_66W; N 1.f � aY.v • N V ems. t c z s+ v a 0 i 9. _a^ S e. yLCC� ^��'� « bn8 R Big L{g. Yng an ..Ooy CDOY9 y Y oy 4 ` �C�p N Ce i= nY:ro� OACcO �+ ls '�4. N ��Og'.. � � �NnA oJiC ^.n� �O• ^J O��o t. B Wp1 Yy pm _ LO `� qa Y. yY YY Cp {! O 8 Y M U Y Y j C 4 C O w r b wtd p G$ y �.r 4 C.. O� yY w�yN y_Y^ NO Yw 4 Cry ^Orpr CO Oa c Kz Z^DY. VOV� �6uL. o.A +tl Zb. yyea. .a+$o Y C q r�COp C��C C�Vr ■^� �MOTO VpC cs n� Cfll YC rL �r�..� V��■ �'y� ^O Nw9C L4agqY Y�.O� ELML 9L p6« O� N �L ate. . �'���1 wNG y^Y COL 'C•"'C+. V` .N. yw YgC.O �� C ry ^y�. 3+^O OY+ pr,ll.Oa Z �1 9z C ZZ Y C C Y N�Q M.Z t+C.U�C •�� p b O� � p 0 `Y a N C� Y�C w^ V L F dsua $wvla^. na' �+go e o zw RESOI..UTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDIT16NAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-17 FOR AN UNMANNED REMOTE SWITCHING STATION LOCATED EAST OF MILLIKEN, NORTH OF HIGHLAND IN THE CARYN PLANNED CO11MUNITY DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 13tft-.day of August, 1986, a complete application was f filed by General Telephone I`0 review of the above-described project; and I WHEREAS, on the 12th day of November,.,i986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commissin held a public hearing to consider the above-described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the 'ancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: C, SECTION 1:- That the following findings can-te met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, .and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applic0le thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to propertied or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies :with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environn;ent�an —,fiat a Negative Declaration is issued on October 22, 1986� SECTION -3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 86-17 is approved subject to�falTowing conditions: PLANNING: 1. That approval is hereby granted for a b65 square foot building and future expansion. 2. That the roof shall be revised to a hip roof and tile roof material 3. That a minimum of two tree wells shall be provided against the north side of the southerly wall and planted with columnar evergreen trees. t PLANNING COMMISSION RES(LUT.ION November i2, 1986 CUP 86-17 - General Telephone Page Z 4. That the matter of 'Ne deed restriction on this property prohibiting the proposed remote switching station be resolvedto the satisfaction of the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. 5. The architecture and landscaping shall be re- evaluated at the time a project is proposed on the property to the north and west of the switching station to insure that the switching station's architecture and landscaping is consistent with the surrounding development. If changes to either the architecture or landscaping of the switching station are required by the Planning Commission said change, shall be completed within 120 days from the date occupancy is granted for the surrounding project. ENGINEERING: 1. An ?agreement between :the City and the owner of the property for the relocation of the drive approach on Milliken Avenue upon request by the City will be required prior to the issuance of buildirg permits. 2. Pri(,x to issuance of a grading permit approval from Caltrans for offsite grading on the future Foothill Freeway ri,rt-of-way to the south of the project must be obtained. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, :1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis ou , a r an i ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of November, 1986, by the following vote-to-wit- AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: J �---- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r1,0CA ro . STAFF REPORT IS � t o DATE: November 12, 198677 TO: Chairman and Members of the planning Commission FRCM: Btad Buller, City Planner ' . BY; Scott Murphy, Assistant Planner SUBJECT.. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 10349 total residential deve opmen o 57 single am y ots on 33.2 acres in the Very Low Density Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the ,rest side of Sapphire Street, south of Jennet Street APR: 1043-121-01, Q2, 03; 1062 011-02, 03; 1062-161-01. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE 86-05 - WALTON CONSIRUCTI -- aquas o ecrease a minimum average o size, minim um lot width, minimums corner lot width, and the: minimum lot depth for a proposed 57 lot subdivision in the Very Low_ Density Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the west side of Sapphire Street, south of Jennet Street - APR: 1043-121- 01, 02, 03; 1062-011-02, 03; a062-•161-01. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: I A. Action Requested: Approval of subdivision design, site plan, Zonceptua grading ing plan, conceptual landscape plan, building elevations, variance and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Project Density: 1.7-du/ac. C. Surrounding Lind,Use and Zoning: or - singT 'family resr en ial; Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) South_ Single family residential; Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) East - Single family residential Very Low Density ` Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre)' West - Single family residential; Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) D. General Pian Designationst Project SiteVery Low Bensity Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) ITEM H PLANNING C6?RMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 10349/VAR 86-05 WALTON CONSTRUCTION November 12, 1986 Page 2 North - Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) South Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) East Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) West Very, Low Density Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) E. Site Characteristics: llie site is currently vacant with a 4 to slope from nort6 to south. There are two Eucalyptus Windrows located 5 feet to the south of the existing site boundaries. ar II. BACKGROUND: A. Original Approval: On ,JEnuary 14, i981, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Sap No. 10349, =total residential development of 58 lots on 33.2 acres of land. The residences proposed; at that time ranged in size from 2,192 square feet to 2,b�2 square feq "n area. The b8 lots ranged in size from <20,000 square fet .'to 'L8j93/ squarr feet, in-_ area. The average lot size withi.:'Zhe tract was 20,820 square feet. At the time of approval, the City was operating upder the previous zoning ordinance which designated the zoning for the site as single family resitsential with a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet. The Tentative Tract Map was in conformance with all the applicable city standards;. The T%ntative Tract was originally approved for a 12 month Period, followed by two 38 month extensions, for a 'total of four years, the maximum permitted by the Subdivision Map Act at that time. -The Tentative Tract Map, however, expired :on January 14, 1985. B. Plaza Builders: With the expiration of the first Tentative Fact Frap, a second application was filed by Plaza Builders for a total residential development similar to the previous submittal. The applicant was proposing the identical site design. b8 lots, but new residences were being introduced. The units, one and two story, ranged in size from 1,980 square feet to 2,530 square feet in area with an estimated selling price between 5160,000 and $180,000. Completion of the review of the application revealed, however, that the proposed development was not in compliance with the current Development Code. The adoption of the new Development Code in 1983 required Tentative Tract Maps in the Very Low Density Residential District to maintaina minimum average lot size of 22,500 square feet in T1'" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT I0349jVA$ 86-05 WALTON CONSTRUCTION November 12, 1986 Page 3 area. Asa result, the applig"ant revised the site plan to meet` the requirements, retultip,S—, in reduction of : je lots; the Tentative Tract'Map request was now for 53 lots. On March 27, 1985,.�the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to receive input and testimony on the Tentative Tract Map. At that time, several residents from the existing r. Thoroughbred Tract expressed their concerns about the proposal. The, residents" concerns centered around four main issues. First, the, approval of the proposed units would severely decrease their property values. The developer was proposing residences in the $160,000 and $180,000 datlae range adjacent. to their hoW,ls value at $300,000 plus Sucond, the residents were concerned that the extension of Thoroughbred Street to Sapphire Street would result in increased traffic and present an unsafe situation due to the number of small children playing in the street. The residents felt that Thoroughbred Street should be made a cul-de-sac. The third issue related to front yard landscaping. - The restde[its felt the front yards should be required to be la/idscaped as a condition of approval. The fourth and ,fiscal topic related to the architectural compatibility of. t-he `ur �?d. units with the Aft existinq residents. The residents- melt that no consideration had beer given to compatibility with the existing Gaily Miller homes on Thoroughbred. The Cvmissior's deliberations focused on these concerns. The Commission concluded that it was necessary for Thoroughbred Street to extend to Sapphire Street for three reasons: 1. If Thoroughbred Street was to be made a cul-de-sac, it would exceed the Foothill Fire District maximum distance of 6CO feet. .This would result in a, excessive response time for emergency venicles. 2. Thoroughbred Street is a water carrying street and drainage would be a problem if Tk,,oroughbred Street did not extend to Sapphire Street. 3. if the Thoroughbred Street did not connect to Sapphire Street, more traffic would have to use Gardenia and Rosebud .Streets; Thoroughbred Street should carry its "fair share" of traffic. In regards to architectural compatibility, the Commission suggested a tr;nsi ti on•,. '`ne on the north and south sides of Thoroughbred Street be p tipd to create greater compatibility Ask of styles, A similar ire was also suggested for Jennet PLANNING`.COMM1f41ON�STAFF REPORT f 7. 10349J AR 96-05 WALTON CONSTi`VICTION November 14,11986 Page 4 % Street. The Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map No. 10349 with an added condition requiring the .first ten Tots of the north and south sides of-Thoroughbred'and Jennet Streets _ to be an architectural transition zone. The designs of the residences were to approved by the Design Review Committee prior to the issuance of building permits. C. Apppe__al__ Following the Planning ,Gt`Mission's aq`)roval, the residents of the existing Thorough6i, d Tract appealed the decision to the City Council. On May 1;t1985, the City Council' conducted a public hearing to receive input and testimony on the appeal. At that time, residents\;, of the existing Thoroughbred Tract restated their concern�� presented at the Planning Commission meeting. Also testilfying`,at the City Council 'meeting we+e residents from Gardenia, Rosebud, and Turquoise Streets. They felt Thoroughbred Street should be extended to Sapphire Street to relieve some of the traffic currently using their streets. The residents stated that Thoroughbred Street- should carry its "fair share" of traffic. After closing the public hearing, the City Council appointed an AD ;HOC Committee to review the proposal The AD HOC Committee include three residents from the Thoroughbred' tract, one resident from Gardenia Street, one resident from Rosebud Street, one member of the City Council, and two members of the Planning Commission. Prior to the July 3, 1985, City Council 'meeting, The AD HOC Committee met on two occasions, On May 9, the Committee established general parame r;,%within which to address issues. The three major areas addressed by the Committee were architecture, on-site improvements, and off-site' improvements'. . The-recommendations were then presented to the developer for his response, which in turn came back to the AB HOC Committee at their meeting of June 25, 1985. At that time, there were two issuee, presented that directly effected the current proposal. They were the,.;circulation system_ and the Variance request, The AD HO'.; Committee recommended that Alternative 2 (see- Exhibit "I") should be selected as the circulation system (identical to the Walton proposal). The developer also requested a variance to increase the number of Tots from 53 to 57 resulting in an average lot size of 20,000 square feet in area. This request was forwarded to the City Council for their consideration. f f t% 4 7 \PLANNING COMRiSiiON STAFF REPORT , TT 10349/VAR 86-05 WALTON CONSTRUCTION November 12, 1986 Page 8 a On July 3, 1985, the City Council 'reviewed the various' recommendations of the AD HOC Committee. The Council approved all the recommendations of the Committee. Also, the Council approved the 57 lot as a condi(Jon of approval and deferred`thz Variance to the Planning Commission for formal action. Exhibit "H" summarizes the various issues and actions taken by tic4 AD HOC Committee and the City Council At the August 7, 1985, City Council meeting, a letter was ! received from the applicant witadrawing from the proposal. The property owner, however, expressed an interest in continuing the application as a custom lot subdik4ision. As a result,, the item was continued to August 21, 198r- • At the August 21, 1985, City Council meeting, following a i ; meeting with the AD HOC Committee, the property owner stated that he could not continue with the project;_ the AD HOC ~` Committee stated that the proposal should be reviewed as a total residential development and not as a custom lot subdivision. A;', a result, the City Council denied the application "without prejudice". cr III. ANALYSIS A. General: Walton Construction is proposing to develop 57 single family homes utilizing the circulation system that, was recommended by the AD HOC Committee and approved by the��ity 1985. The homes being proposed Council in July of are identical to the Gary' Miller Homes existing on Thoroughbred Street. The units consist of one and two story units ranging in size from 2378 square feet to 3190-square feet in area. B. Variance: In conjunction with the Tentative Tract Map," appTicatii"on, the applicant, has also submitted a variance' request for the following code inconsistencies' 1. The subdivision does not meet the minimum average lot si;re of-22,500 square feet in area. The applicant is proposing' a subdivision that. averages 20,826 square feet in area. 2 -Lots 33. 35, 40, and 42 do not meet the minimum lot width of 80 feet as measured at the front set-back (42 feet from ultimate face of curb). The lots are 72 feet in width. f' I / /' / PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 10349/VAR 86-05 WALTON CONSTRUCTION November,12, 1986 Page 6 i 3. Lots 1 and 57 do '`not meet the minimum corner lot width of 100 feet as measured at the front setback (42 feet from ultimate faceof curb). The lots proposed are 94 feet in width. t 4. Lots 16, 18, 19, 46, and 46 do not meet the minimum lot depth of 150 feet as meas!red from the midpoint of the front property line to tpa midpoint of the rear property line. a Lot lfi is 140,feet in depth, b. Lot 18 is.136 feet in depth. C. Lot 19'is 146 feet in depth, d. Lot 45 is 145; feet in depth.. e. Lot 46 is 141 feet in depth, C. Design Review Committee On October 2, 1986, the Design Review Committee rev ewes and recommended approval of the proposal subject to the following conditions: 1.- The driveway on lot 48 should be relocated to the east side of the property or to Avenue 8 td J =ode safer access. 2. All corner side elevations should',be upgraded to match the front elevations. 3. Wood or stucco plant ons should be provided around all windows on all elevations. 4. A design treatment for the area between garage doors that is similar to the design treatments used on .rds of the ' garage elevations should be provided. j 5. For the majority of the lots, a fifty fiot usable ya-d area should be provided to the rear of the residences and--a ten foot usable yard area should be provided adjacent equestrian trail to provide areas for corals and/or stables. In between the two yard areas will be slopes that will vary depending on the remaining distance. The net effect will be a terraced rear yard. i 6. Extensive landscaping should be provided along Sapphire Street to provide privacy for lots 1 and 57, The Design Review Committee also discussed the code requirement of providing sidewalks on one side of the street. The Committee was undecided on whether or not this requirement should be considered- as part of .the Tentative Tract application. The Committee deferred this item to the Planning t�; PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 10349/VAR 86-05 WALTON CONSTRNCTION November 12, 1986 Page 7 Commission f+br further review. Staff46uld like to point out that thw recommendations of the AD HOC Committee and the action of the City Council from July of 19K deleted the requirement of providing sidewalks on one side of the street in order to maintain the rural characteristics of the area, If the Planning Commission \ietermines that sidewalks are not appropriate, then Engineering condition No. 2 of the Resolution should be deleted: 0. Technical Review Committee A rendition has been included in e proi-ct approval resolutions (No. I.C. Engineering) requiring that in lieu fee be paid as contribution to the further undergrounding' of the -existing overhead utilities located on the opposite (north) side of the existing equestrian trail along ttt, northern boundary of lots 33, 34, 35, 40, 41. 42, and 47. "This requirement appears consistent with current Commission policy. However, the Commission may want to consider an exception in this case because it would appear unlikely that the utilities will be underarounded in the, foreseeable further for the following reasons: 1. She property to the north is already developed, therefore, will not contribute funds to the undergrounding, 2. It appears unlikely that the City would commit funds (rule 20 or others), for the remaining 1/2 cost of undergrounding in such a rL-note location, 3. Additional funds would be necessary to convert and underground the services to the existing homes to the north (estimated to be $1,500 per home), 4. No funds are committed to the portion of the lines beyond the tract boundary. E. Grading Committee: On September 30, 1986, the Grading iommiftee reviewea the proposal and expressed concern over two main issues 1) the grading concept and 2) drainage conditions in regards to the grading concept. The Committee recommended that an alternative grading concept be provided. The Committee stated that larger yard areas should be provided adjacent to the residences and the equestrian trails, utilizing 2-to-1 slopes in between the two yard areas. The second issue, drainage conditions, was also addressed by the Committee due to the flooding of the properties to the south in recent years. Tho Committee recomrended that preventive measures to include a 36 inch swale and a 42 inch hydrostatic wall be installed along the south property boundary. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT , " - TT 103491VAR 86-05 WALTON CONSTRUCTION November 12, 1986 Page ,'s At the meeting,. the Cormittee did not, recommend'approyaI of)the grading plan. Walton Construction has submitted revised plans that address concerns of the Grading and Design' Review Committees. The Grading Committee has conducted .a °cursory review of the revised plans and determined that the plans, as submitted, reflect appropriate grading and, drainage techniques. It appears, however, that modifications" o the plan may be necessary to meet requirements of other Committees (i.e., Trails Committee). !Upon soY,,,Wication of the design of the tract, the Grading Committee,'will- be''-cble to review the plan for compliance with Planning Commission's direction. As a result, a condition of approval has been included r^quiring review and approval of the grading plan by the Grading Committee prior to the issuance of any permits. The protective measures ,necessary for the propert es to the soutFr3�9uld not i be affacted by other Committee recommendations due to the fact r - that Walton Constrcction is proposing an equestrian trail, 36 inch swale, and six (6) foot,high block wall along the southern site boundary.- F. eTra�ls Advisopy Committee: '. On October 17,_1986, the-Equestrian v sory'1CommTtfee reviewed and approved the profeci (subject to the following requirements: 1. A fifteen foot community trail with offer of dedication is to be provided along the northerly tract perimeter at lots 33 15. 40 - 42, 47 per the master plan of trails. The requlrcient for an offer of dedication will reduce the lot sixes of ;lots 34 and 41;to less than 20,000 square feet in area and ,reduce tie lit depth to leas than the minimum requirement of 150 fe_.. •2. Local feeder trails are to be provided along the 4riutherly boundaries along lots 1 14 and 24 - 30. The w. dth of 1 easement is to be determined subsequent to the ,- tmittai of a master plan-of 'trees showing the precise location of Windrows .(Eucalyptus) ir, relation to the tract boundary, Further. investigation of the tree location has determined that the Eucalyptus kindrows in both locations are five feet south of the project boundary. As a result, Staff would suggest that a twelve foot equestrian trail ease:jetit be provided alcn; the southerly boundary of lots 1 - 14 and 24 - 30. 3. Internal feeder trails are to be relocated such that they straddle the property Tines (for example: lots 15, 16, 18, 20, and 49). PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT i Tf'10349/VAR 86-05 u4LTON CONSTRUCTION k November 12, 1986 Page 9 i a 40 F 4. Provide corner cut-offs �m feeder trail easements on the inside angles where the trails change directions. \ 5. Provide a ten foot wide feeder trail along the northerly boundary of lots 51 - 57 6. Provide a ten, foot' wide feeder v:ail along the westerly ; boundary of lots 31 - 33. 3> Provide a community trail on the west side of Sapphire ' Street. The applicant's plans indicate the dedication if G ' the additional -�:7 feet necessary to provide a community trail 20 feet in width. 8. The tract is to be graded to provide a minimum fifteen foot ,. level area on th;^� of ad3aceni to the local feeder trail. 9. Vehicle access (drive approaches) with vehicle access gates are to be :nrovided where th(i feeder trails intersect the ri streets, 10. A master plan of equestrian trail improvements, with all the appropriate details, shall be included a, part of the t develOpment package, submitted for the rev{eat and approval of tfic Planning CoW.ission. The applicant has Adt proviJed the maser plan requested by ,he Trails Committee due to concerns over ,'trails locations and requir6imts. The aforementioned recommendations are included as conditions of approvals within the resolution. G. Environmental Assessment: The applicant has completed the Part of the nv ronmen a ssessment. Staff has completed Part II and finds that the Tentative Tra�,t will not'have a significant environme*tal impact and recommends that a:negative declaration be issued. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order for the Planningg Commission to approve Tentative Tract Map No. 10349 and Variance 86-06, facts to support the-follow-ing findings must be made: ' A Tentative Tract Maps 1. The Tentative Tract is consisted with the General Plan, Development Code, and Specific Plans; 2. The design or the 'improvement of the Tentative Tract,a s consfttent 'with the General plan, Development Code, and Specific Plan; �r PLANNING COWISSI'ON STAFF REPORT A' i'T 10349/VAR 86-05 WALTON CONSTRUCTION .L; November 12, 1986 rage 10 3. The site is'physi cal,iy suitable for the type of development proposed; 4. The design of the subdivision is not lilteiy to cause subs#^;ntial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wild life order inhabitant-, 5. The Tentative 'tract is not likely to cause seriow _` public health problems; 6. Th-", design oC)Tentative Tract will mot conflict with any easement acg6ire by the pablic at large now of record for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision; and 7. That this grojeat will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative De laration is issued. : B. Variance. 1. That strict or literal interpretation afd enforcement of the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the.Development Coda; 2. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances ; r conditions applicable to the,property involv4d or to the sire intented of the property than do not apply generally to other properties in the'same district; 3. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owwnerc of the properties in the same district; 4. That the granting of variance would not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on. ocher properties classified in the same district; and 5. That the granting of the variance would not be detrimental of the p,61ic health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The applicant has submitted a letter providing justification for the variance request see Exhibit "J"). IV. CORRESPONDENCE; This item has been advertised in The Daily Report newspaper as a- public hearing and notices were ro ,sen o all- property owners within 300 feet of the project site. r: i - •. arc„ .'�' ^7 •' `� � PLANNING'COEi~9IsSI0N STAFF REPOTb' TT 103491UAR 86,06 WALTON CONSTA '.TION November 12, 1085 Page 11 r 9 ax V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission' receive all input on the proposed development. if the Planning Commission- supports the 'facts and findings for approval of the Variance and Tentative Tract Map, Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract Map 10349 and Variance 85-05 and issue a Negative Declaration. Re ful I s tied . r Brad Bu er - City' Planner BB:SM:sgr Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Otilization Map Exhibit "B" - Tract Map Exhibit "C'' - Site Plan ' Exhibit "D" - Conceptual. Grading. Plan Ex,ib9t I ' Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "F",- Drainage Pattern Map Exhibit "G" - Elevations Exhibit I'M" - Recommendations of AD HOC Committee b Actions F of City Council from'July 3, 1985 Exhi kA t "I" Circulation System Approved by AD hoc Committee & City Council Exhibit "J" - Letter from Applicant Providing Justification for,Variance Request . Resolutions of Approval for Tentative Tract 10340 pp �. Resolutions of A royal for 1larance 86-05 i o3E 9■ K _ --.- r lie CITY OF. T rrF-\I! :. riQ G-UCA IG\'GA s 1'CfLE= PLANluI\G Di?r7.SI01 EYHtt3rr .¢ --�_..._SCkLF= - AIL cr. r s E � • r a r •ff7� D Hi— —A CITY OF rrF-%I ra �9 o RANCHO CUCAMO GA TrrtE. PLANNING DNISKDN EXHIBIT.- SCALE: H�l �j A w'Ns —� y �, i• 1 '( Via•_t � �",�, J � t •t ,i �'� Jt �f ! a NI . G CITY OF RAINI CIO Ct CA.MOINGA Trr>�: �- PLAN,Nt,G Divisic t`/ Ej'CH(t3fT: C SCALE: _ "iC ci x g rl e56IRS gai � ♦ k� ,�. + f f+f ' F�� l ti7 d j 4 CITY QFRA T �,L' VICE 'GA rrrU: '� PLANNING DP%rbgC kN EXHIBIT. SGCIx= ti �y � ague � a�eu.ne f Ill lilt 1 Y t _ a G� a { CITY OF rr�> /� �i•3� PLANNING L?1-L91ON EXHIBIT, �f-/6 �rtnr harto r 40 CITY OF rrF%t: R.ANCTD CUCA'V O GA TrrLE: PT..A�3"i�I G DI",ISKkN r-%HIMT. •� � SCALE-- F %uta t i ODeof�? . r�ax�•as:.. a `/ t � 1 Me t fr% r ti- r � _ t F CITY OF T rrE . RANCHO CLCAMO GA , TITLE= PLA r� t Ali\C Urv-Lq(N EXHIIUT- i SC%LE- G cs lit CITY OF .rrF� PLANNING MISK7 ! EXHII�lT:--, _cC\.LE. f' t, CITE (Dr, rre%I:�/,& 4 00-, RANCHO CUCAVIONG( k Trrt.rr= PLANNING MISK)N H A6 EXHIBM- SGki:E= 1 • a CITY OF, rm t. RANCHO CUCA IMONGA Tom: PLANNING DTV1SM E.tf-IMT= i .. � '� ���gg` p� ��� ,P �It ���• f' ! r Ask I CITY C,11j MUL . PLANNING t3i VI�"i0LN BXHtBIT. f�- Sc�u,- !. 4` 3 ` l = i l f•! t I. . h� CITY Or. T ' T ti'C�4 RAIN u CUCA1MONGA rtrt. -. iaA/ PLANNING I?M. �c!-ttt3rT SCALEt a � .54 G EDEI ; C CITY Or. TI'C'I.,E- 1v,.� -�oy PLANtiI\G DivisiIXY i✓YE itBiT:s :.S-,M\LE_ t #A ,i CITY OF PC.ANNI c DIVuQN EXHIBIT-SCALE. V cN It DDCIT''Y OF, crE`I: 1e.35� �* �-ds HO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DRrb9ON / EXHIBIT-—<z:Z.Sc kLE. #' r� r _- -_ .. .....r. _ 1 E 1 � Doc a fF-Q . CITY Ql' rre�i: f_o�3f w 8 . - RANCHO CUCA MO GA PLANNING DIVISKYN EXHIBIT>l-�`-8 SC1 LF-- ( :.4 rj �,l4 sl ,f _•� ! { f ff7 , I rr-r `_ f fr f ;i 1• ` 4 f . 1 CITY Or, rrE�zt /G73 -Qs RANCHO C Cell ONGA TrrU, PL4NNING MISION EXHIBIT- SCALE IP` r t QF-1 �. Ma t CITY QI. rrc\t: z.4/7 RANCHO T ,( CHQ CLCAyIONGA TrrLE.- PLANNING TRL7t rrc•ON EXHIBIT. fo'�AL,vi [11 Y �J�� - if l as CITY OF T rrE.\r-- fa--�y',J,/Jr,4 Rat\ GL,C l �Ji1,GA. TrrL , PLA.NNum; I}n'15'K)N ' T,-36 �C v s� t i Y t u Ct` s r } �r. Y X I t C_ _N t� CITY C`!' 9/ RANG`O 'CUC4dMONGA TITI F- l.157V, � 14A PLANNING DIVLSK)LN F-XHIIHT-C;2:/ SCALE- v El _ 91 A�_ j _10f coo R ISM, CITY OF rrr-\i: PLAN`IItiG M 'IOty E�CHtt3TT: _SGttE__ u N 0t nl;it >A L L LW,LY i fm N a yp N V= QwN.1 lli 9Qpld W {,, N " Y d ggp 4p.u p 4 >Y da N.Y Itl LM OYN " V�Uj �C=1 �Lq MQ �GLGIY a� Y G:41 "Y p N2.2 zu N V L uat ^ ■ ® C" N 0!T u 'aim � pp I L Nr W O N V 0 .. U —U%N � M wl Ndd O � C O.mil W C U� L•� N- 4 N �' d WlL -A,- �O L~ a+ J.-A Oyu L:/� In dZ>fU Y W O/r D Ol OrOi C O aV+. A N N C U V y b N b C 01 Or OTC! Lr L G >L r >Nwa Lw+q� W- 67 is O V U 6M C d N le. a C � � L G Cl Cl. N b G LS 601.A a 3 0 a,..- 2 e7 M v L CL W HCM�.9 O V9N Y G G/ NL dN I Y W N q Y 9a+.E C L C V,y GL.CJ YY � i m 6!b.t M +�N omw A ybL Ctww Et�a+O 2�yw > Nc O LNC]W OLO/� y O/q � U.G N N j q V 9 C aid b L t LSOi L73c.r NY4�LCl Ar V tL CJ iO O Q�F L N O OC10 H a Ab�b N N� � Ate)=ctic+ a+L-in a�am y. m v-a. mu I a n i=camCL HA w >uaNivu^ ` gL3 �0 H m m m o A u to.L 43 ai i 9 LLB., L L O OM Ni;w 0 qp CW.R � NO A O mTq�LC G V! a•+C Ow. `7Ud ` U m� tl rnx bo Y1LpNCV+aONw+\GDi�-Y'ONi6.i OMNaG..YY+yVO0,1 vy4mEmm+�Q}am Yru+ Siq+CUNg.0yC YqOy M^0Oc}m-0 - i OGN�LpMU C DUN.p,LVyCa1 roa;wi{yayv��AY3 y1 CV ZG J r9 My Qy � bU- +.VA 4I POw U 20 "QCrNS NCvC Tp.a `O Co.pT-ri. �yD1aqyI a.^ 1.D C1 wE Q +S+wN^A'Y m4N O. w Lg34L ,6 TifO U yY S��y K IV"* 4 R y O N V0 C G 6 01 �t0 C•+CI a nw �, r[fd 4 C 'mC O m qNC 4.RS U'O N co i ltfa U�UCL6 a.OA�UpL,Q G4 Gy��p 3q: ViUy' C yV�C IMN Y»Gm mat. vp Ew9U. aU1 O� Y.q 4 V L i ._ CCCCCy LLL"' Q r...:Y-+e�r. u rW a N L >Lyaw.rr ay L a it m {[S W V 311 V y? V O N«-C N r L1 q O u N O yr 6 = py Y p V m Y-.fry '. �� sO.wN.UU yy V��_�61 Yy 61. V tO.rLEaN U. a.°-g7Yp .�Gi H w}�'r F.. 1-.2 Q.Ni FI'�•h !�N asu 4! Vb AAAL r� 4i .G r N.0 G A N f•7 V' �-i /W - iiy F AP � p.NMw Wo a 1r N N.0 Ln Ln 0 0) N$'Cr9S"S7 u G N A.rC.m.•. 'cS.�.F ley of Yq Nr Ursa+ m y N O:C'. D++ it m'O•P a:V. C G y L L m L•.r�L r+C a+D a A L as N O.'�Ol w O r O}S m�[.O V U?�.a 'D p •a u RY O Mg a w V a s 'O Ct is L++C1. 'O L rd V ut Dr C L>P m G L O y N g S�+O L a" cc G V m. OIp O4-gryrC mm L10.E R ' p N oL mL LR O . ex 3. SY-Ob 0S aM LN iT �Q'L ivaaip,G i.! LL"C»W H Fs O.N,. Ov�+'r H N ROr-p mr- ar a OL C X QC.•• 4 09 O4.i+rW : W PaV dL . 01 Nid R Nw O �w QI w d V$p R' S.LVUL aC iN VaiCu9c 45 V.. Um.Df C RmpS4.0 p .]C 0. cwavaD p i 'O Lq Vr tal R y ? w !'•Y d M W 1�N:Ory q O H V �-m:0.N Z N E CYCnCL Ua am � Cy.D u C.L+V A N V CL DZO �s Vim/ r.y v� 0 O 9. CV N>aNi w u L 40� 'dd'' c4i. C�N(�G en N NU O1 TOV p.O• C OOKr .•p. R P O Lc40E p L a, V N G U 'O'L pPa LUC wd E...T }� O$✓ O N O N N cry^O C Lqa•• LrM �,nIY� r/!f G.01. J CCU YILNg E.�LL a a 'a - a L d 01 C,.. CYU>Y 6. 6 L A NI O.C '7U �..r. Gy d ? 3dYL..>�y9ytIW f' Y.ad��. °�. ro 07 e�v��wav^Cy C ♦+R OV d�U.iC Y • CI Cifd RNM+o--� �gYyyO11Y�. eE yM O'N da T¢NY �C � �71CCDA w `YNL�Nry'O a`�i;U Q VaNaY VI.LcNY � 1yy� u q �N ~ Cp L9 Y Cf.r+>;.�Ndf0,Om i'n s-0 W dad OIL v. c d+�.s+ ". •�j tp.1� 13 t N W V!E=Y. 'y cz C4 Qd t A++TYUL .0'm c -} G a a a LN�N.W yi+l d d d O OI O OI Rrr w C'O W. L {. N Y9Nd�40 6 G 0 C ^ O Q L>O V L q R++P+O d p N N N > A Y O R dU G y TC.� W d d d d d Y dA!d+ GR.Ft-U ati p N 'CI Cd V' C,OdM OI u..4 aR. d.N WOILL mmb EgYd In id Y Of O r OIN tl d W q N. .0 Rv. Oil Ta" tad a.0 La C Cy N..6Ll Y'� �'0a CNV T �. aQ a++ .ern i.IC GNnw. yb.. rz �V t 1 '� \ � _T �,3 2, a I � �� � 'l I rill � - i� T�-�- _._. I 2011 east finsn vial way/ post office box 775/ glendora,calrfornia 91740 1 (818)963-8505 Ortober 13, 1986 RCfr'�1Vi<'J CHY OF PA/MHO C'UCAMONGA I Mr. ,Scott ::urnhy ; : fJCU Pl19 City of Racho Cucamonga aM , ' r_ Planning Department 7)$(�;IMill-,12, "`-r;$. 9320 Baseline Raad Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 ,3 7`• Subject: Request fog,` Variance on Lot Area, Depth and Width for Tentative Pract Number 10349 4 ; Gentlemen. Th e Walt n c Associ,,it d e Gom an 'e s respectfully Y requests est s the III granting of the requested variances based "on the follow7,ng reasons: 1. Lot Area Minimum required average 7�,500 square feet, proposed 20,800 square fe et. The 'P lanning Commission utilizing County Develo pment meat Sta ndards, previously ;� approved a tentative teact on this site. The proposed development meets, it exceids the development standards of the surrounding area and is in conformance with the city's verj low density Resident,'al District of the Land Use Element of the General Plan. 2. Lot Depth Misimut,l required 150 Square feet. Six (5) lots, lb, 18, 19, 4.5, 46 and 48 are at variance with your current code_ : The proposed subdivision however, meets or exceeds lets previously developed to County Standards on Taorougobred. Thi variance for lot d.•pLhs are created b" current City Standards, recommendations of the Ad Hoc 7ommittee for 'w,vised street aiignment of Jennett and Th-orou2h6" - equestrian drainage and driveway easements. 3. Lot Widths Minimum required 80 square feet and/or 90 feet average. Proposed 72 square feet average. Four (4) lots, 33, 35, 40 and 42 do not meet current code requirements. These lots are deficient, but meet or excoed previous county development standards and those of the existing Thoroughbred tract. The widths were reduced to accommodate current City Standards for cul de sac radius drainage and equestrian easements. The ,,y Vi alton Associated ' •' Companies f Page 2 >� „ Mr.. Scoff L .any Ck"Y' of Rancho Cucamonga, October 13, 1986 4. Corner Last Widths Minimum regtired 100, eeC. Proposied 94 square feet. The Trail Committee requirement for an additional 9 sQuar2. feet oz dedication to ''provide a 20 fr_1ot'�F,wide equestrian trail on Sapphii'e Street has :educ;ed the width of corner lots 1 and 57. » We have devoted cansidurable time, money and energy to design an aesthetically pleasing development in keeping with the recommendations of the Ad. Hoc Committee, staff and homeowners. ` The proposed development will meet or exceed the development; standd'ards of the surrounding residential areas by provi.din,R compa'table architectural" design,, extension of a safes ana °4 aasthetically pleasing street ,,lignment to Sapphire, improved drainage and ;equestrian facil: 2s for the area. p We look forward to working with the staff and Planning Commission to develop, a high quality residentie,l cons+m-j—ty. Sincerely, THE WALTON ASSOCIATED COMPANIES Guy,A. Williams Jr. l Consultant GAW:mj 01 i J h RESOLUTION NO. AML A, RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAI,IFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY"APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 10349 AND DESIGN REVIEW THEREOF. WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Rap No. 10349, hereinafter "Map' submitted by Walton Construction, applicant, for the purpos6 of subdividing,tne=reai property situated in the City of Ra:;zho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a residential-subdivision of 57 lots on 33.2 acres of laid located on the west side of Sapphire Street, south of aennet Street, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on Novembc 42, 1986; and WHEREAS;- the CityPlanner has recomnenued approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS', the Planning Commission has read and considered. the Engineering and Planning Divi'tJon's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the fisllowing fincings,,� in regard to en a :ve Tract No. 10349 and the Map thereof; (a) The tentative tract, in conjunction Oth t',te Variance request, is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; " (b) The design or 'improvements of the tentative:tract, . in conjunction with the Variance request, is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (a) The tentative tract is not likely to cause Serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict j with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. r € H— PLANNING COMMISS16-kESOLUTION Nd TT 10349 WALTON .CONSTRUCTION November 12, 1986' Page 2 (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the enviroraent' and a Negative Declaratisn is Issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 10349, a copy. of which is attached nerd and design review thereof, is he^eby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION4 1. Approval' of Tentative Tract Map No 10349 is cnntt_3ent upon approval of Variance 86-05. 2. All corner side elevations shall be upgraded to match, a",, front elevations. 3. Wood or stucco plant-ons shall be provided around all windows on all elevations. 4. A design treatment for the area betwoin garage doors that is similar to the design treatment usey on the ends of the garage elevation shall be provided. S. Alli roofing material shall be tile. 6. Extensive landscaping shall be provider along the east side of Lots 1" and 57 subject to review and approval of the Cfty Planner. 7. A reviled grading plan, incorporating all Conditions of approval, shall be submitted to the Grading Committee for review and approval prior to the issuance of any permits. 8. A 15' foot community trail with Offer of Dedication shall be provided along the northerly tract perimeter of Lots 33, 34, 35, 40, 41, 42, and 47. 9. Local feeder trail easements, 15 feet in width that straddle the property line, shall be provided in the following locations: a. Extending north from Jennet Street to the northerly tract boundary between lots "3-37 and 38-40. b. Extending north from Bennet Street to the northerly tract boundary_between lots 42-44 and 44-46. �i c. Extending easterly from Avenue "A" to the existing tract (9539) between lots 18, 20, ' 49 and 17, 19, 50. ,� H_-110 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 10349 WALTON CONSTRUCTION November 12, 1986 Page 3 Amok 10. Corner cut-offs on local feeder trails for inside angles where trails change directions shall be provided. p 11. A ten foal wfJe vocal feeder' trail shall be provided along . " the-nort45erly boundary of lots 51-57. i2. A ten foot wide local feeder trail shall be provided along the westerly boundary of lots 31-33. 13. The tract shall be graded to prq°vide: a minimum 15 fo;} level area on the lot adjacent to`the' local feeder trails. 14. Vehicle access (drive approaches) and vehicle access gates shall he provided where the local feeder trail intersects the street. E3 ENGINEERING DIVISION: 1. EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES a. Lines along the North Property Lines of Lots 51 through 57: The existing overhead utilities (electrical) along the north, property, lines of lots 51 through 57 shall be undergrounded or rercoved for the entire length of the utility lines extending across Sapphire Street prior :,to public Improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever, occurs first. Reimbursement of one-ha'l,f the adopted post forundergropnding is not feasible because the adjacent property is presently Bevel opk11. b, Sapphire Streets An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on ._the opposite side of Sapphire Street shall be paid to the City prior to recordation of the Final Map. The fee shall be ,one-half the adopted unit amount times the length of the project frontage on Sapphire Street (498). c. Lines within the equestrian trail north of Lots 33-35, 40-42 and 47: An in-lieu fee as contribution to ,che future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electe4*a1 PLANNING C'0MHISSION tESOLUTION NO. TT 10349 WALT04 CONSTRUCTION November 12, 1986 Page 4 within this equestrian trail shall be paid to the C';ty prior to recordation of the Final Map. The fee shall he one-half the adopted unit .,1 amoun�.times the length of the project frontage' 2. Si dewiai ks shall be constructed on only, one side of the foi,iatiing interior streets: a, ibuthside of Thorough; red Street, b. Sq?�thsi de of;0ennet Stt eet, and c: loduthside of Avenue W. 3. Positive drainage °,ontrol facilities "shall be provided within the equ strian trails in accordance with City Standard No. 1001 or as otherwise required by the Building Official. 4. Drainage protnrtion shall be provided at the so*nth"corner of Thoroughbred Street and Avenue "A" as foli�,ws or' as otherwise approved by the City Engineer: a. A 2' high block wall for drainage ;protection' shall be provided at the back of the sidewal from the easterly edge of the driveway on lot 13 to the westerly edge of the driveway on lot 12. b. The driveway .for lot 13 shall be moved as far, ` westerly as passible and the driveways for lot 12 shall be moved as far easterly as possible to maximize the length of the wall required per P. "au. above. c. The driveways for lots 11, 12, and 13 shall be roiled' to 'provide a minimum one foot barrier y above the top of curb. APPROVED'AND ADOPTED THIS 12 DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: _ Dennis L. Stout, !,`a ►man ATTEST: grad Buller, Deputy Secretary PLANNING COM14ISSFON, RESOC'UTION NO. TT 14349 WALTON CONSTRUCTION i�uaveAb. w 12, 1986 I, Etad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning COmnfissi'on of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do herby certify that the foregoing R(:solution was duly and regularly tntroduced,�--Yassed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the.PTanning Commission held on the 12 day of November, 1986, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ` ASVI : COMMISSTONERS; F a ' I ,I a 'J Z.Ort;t �A 1G. MY.. wYp wYi�M. per. �y:1V �' 'w# OJ.L w.A 14 '4 ��, --'- M N Y.im r< 4 'tl y G�.. VMp `.,a. ' i afa a.4link 0��K« Y`�, r8NL.6 yo+ aiFa c yy aa ypY 4CyD� Y ptl� t\d �� C 6 01 tl 4�V 4 iw¢.� t ewM•Y"a`a LY ptll bi�.. �4�ch �� <�r.C.a '��� l C� Q Y O;�pV YAtTSY �«O.VO 4w L�L.� t*r�V p�.y�rY �0.4A0„ YP~.C« a.a. az ��M M yC' g xR Z'4 4� 4$€< $ N " It IV all �.; 111 Ct w �`p Sr RL_O�r$ OIgV` N SNi �y wr Deb �f YYAw b.« TYv pL.6AV$T� t� a` MaM:> C.aF ECaN Q � `•�yjj 4V�f qy 'Z-0C I M iiilYY y S > T■p pC.s Ca VG f}may�'ps i�Y iQp y�4rr � ei 4�jLa,..yr. ay Alt U�y� KIN Is V.�h.r bAadip Ai6G`Lf` .� w.•YQww �`O. C w1 1 �' bq•a 4 Y 4 L Of yYC hl6M NCgw.w AipQY4 Otl;Y6 Y��$t+~ t tl y F� yat w C pp C Yqq 4� N O a' 6 MU L 9,,1pp� 3 yy5 L a�YC�V.yitlLL y .� O�y $N pY Vi `i'� .p'V�y AOL- N } aNa .p. aw yt qYW.0 §� F. L1 '` t%�Y��i`o,ti wp� a■a4 Y pl t e Y C Ll p M� � 4 � L X 9•t'C b�6 Q. r, ` 4■ stir Y Y 'tlG~ p ; O Cq �LC.wwY✓.Ni�`Y Oaaa y Y =-V� c+ � �w .Na C376 G w( w aa YM slta4.f.ca..� Y . K f 7 t' ��' $�i V=N p^�" •Lsyy .eNnp O `u a I�1 �u� Y O,w y O Y M r M U L G Y r° Y ;O• C::w- 6 _ ac�s �.. ^`Y w cn�s nLo~�.a�S.a c� �� -, ep yy.. LLn q 9n aw; a^O° z O..O �. y.M.r L `rA�•r per. �'1...G.Y qy^. Y �. G• �.{�`. LLO y r pN�O YppQ L C C G V E Y L N q.w O a V r.Y �� i IVI Y;r y Q O p C CV V Yi1. Y wYY 7.pi M. O}s ^^Oq NWYW y/N ■Or�41.w.GGO. Yu�. CNQ.V�Y qC N Gq Yc OOkO E�1y...tC 1� ®q+u0U6� ...p`o- Vi yNO"C L� w{Lyt-I =-... Y Y OgI ny~ 4� YC'N 11,Y� rOO wi Vw^ ^n Y 'QM M- 1 YY �^ $ S Y. weeq o.9, 4 gy -73 oarc c-- b: 'Ib Y«r .-A.� yae..r.^s p S. .. .GF ^'i4T• r..S • r L uq Y C Y V N Y �a MYVw VOOt� T� g= ZO r+i4C I— O NV mY NN}qp� �O S Ns■� Ny �y% p,t �^ �.n�y N Yp L 'IG'l"'.0 1�{� 4:> CZ L��C OSwUO.C9... 1r .'1 VrY.Y. �YpO Q. ��I9 `Yga,�t qCM y� L "l Y gGNY g g YY'ev�'L�... apo O9T " 3Lu� 55� 6 i.M6 tusz{ 1.2 y CCL�4��U.� °tY ^CpY Ytiro {wy: ti A G N 1 c Qcv `... a--n $s '«,Y.-cM Ya.L _G° � e'uv ra wo $r ° yy CC pp• O6.. EYtS� « wL O .V LN a0 ♦ a ^ Lq� Ly`a`i01. Or 2� C roC`.. E Sy E ON gS4.` vj�.��E•�-. + 8'na 'ug u� o $i e Y� Sa1X " -� SYS� ` cY. $ C , �wqa CV QCn L^C de %r wCg}-pL6TCC V.O. tiv{p V+pY r Y.LYO G w • yw V. �� VW CV .0 pvA 6NOpL..tNMi YY�CT O4p GC vOY`..zNYE MzspZ .21- 05 g N14 Ca YY IV G OB$ —G NM �a qSM =}Y.c ���YY SL ei'.i..R'�.onv e�NYc rO ocao GpL.Y O Y 6 7�G S p wNY 1. T..OI pppp^ irg NU YfNJ�tYry �Y upMr `_ �OY�O N. Y. E O� n� 6 VO =r PO PVL LSwY. O Na rN]1 a> iL. Yg Te q Yo ca^o eyy cao ra�G y�p S tri v o. �ro� Gvu Gi $^ ca�g GY w Sn v `.0 n t - u4 uo,'.a, nY -u u Yo uaY ao°oa o. c A.ncn n •-.c.`.o. i�H� u..n..�► cu «o ar'a.«w=. .r..s...YiwYN o .t-G:ta► c.i �. f: «^ .tetu`. r y4 N�Cp c.9 �Cb Noru. 4 Z V¢ 1 b••� .Li ay C� "$$tlC •��A.. CCvI� Y. + VM��yy I , CC �" Al iL �`Y 'C Y.1.`.N VVp.Qy�S ``. YCC CJ �N `QN 4 =h bCOM pV 44 N S. $ Y fff O M L Y tl ' w Y t!Y. m �M�t/ V ?`Ypt1 CN_ �}'�. S fi AZY Y A KM-. w Y� V •NYC} �IS V 6pN QVA C iP q {1 v. gyp" C �. -yW 4 M tl `, ayY�% .�Caf OIL NNV{{w. MiY M 48 T1, 6 V y Y�` 'tlS I tlw ��Yw �4.Y.y�Mi4 Vb�6L�la L2�. L'.��V�1 III 1.9 y .5— YNN y G V�'O.�Y y m534.y p�YaYpp�w � . CCC �� AN pY Yy �Q N a :H �� 4 t .. ^ O NYC 1 b V• O }}!! i y sv �`.$ a« -u tl 4ev Bey y p a c OI V T N V • O.p 1 L V N N C• L eN� L,o''C 6.x woi a: ti`��a li V Awl ��� dC45.^ .$ •L ;�� � 43r i�a.> ayy� M�'g �N., 6+ai'; f ue y«:a�. •� �.Y „ 4 u`iy`. Z. Ic 2— at +^{C y .. _:S pNa C� _ -0� O 4^� NYr YYa Oq N:O GpV �v YNSY �` 09�= i;w�Y� EV4 Y UN 4 b CON V.tl i�0.. H� gyp Tl V eVa. Cr:w ♦ p Y.uw� wYO LC4G.E5 G CC ^ V �r - OZ <Zpp �� 1_ 225 �wN IIE� ■ CC t� L iLy y RLa■ >=p 'p_ a VaYyy` V . ^ 13>.N: -4is N y N ' Vtlu V ww..0.a wY V Oda D ptL L ACCC bi- a_O Eu Si 4 Ita uuG <� T KSiN H6.M KY Kv r;-o.b.�m, AG.O iM.69 Wb.RE j: III up w. N 19 ♦ N. N V wl \ N� I au N. Scw o.e'a u► ab sue► vri•. « u.Tp ie•Y atVuc. .- ■Y v- b oa+ at © = geCy Y^�ii �rM 4l• u QCeCO YGY Y� 01+.0 • `Or. � }••[[p. Vv1•. L� -QLY d: W� YY4`Y at pN -. ��G CY M DI V.,V �' �V Dy CU ViY 11yyNY ` L� Y �4pi c).Gb .�N. w. \V,. •.•Y 00 D Y: y C C ypp�.V L Y.•i. V i^ O Y� C NL ��� yN►rYEj N=-g C`Y` `R Z' .� iaa bY�L a Cy.�1 N{E 1- YY aIC VOO YL VO.eb Ilq P�wq■ Y u l A D N M W C b y- :_2WY Y e a O O N yVCC .' ,� O yy y •� .►` C L y c 2�`.A ar�Y„rd W Y w` a a. a, +u G J! b �diu 1 tD q G. b ay•aY O J .G9L� G Oi G ^L � V {N, Yo0. f� i• � b VV Y �Lry�►q. p p Y Y Y O: y ti {G� +4 ^y 0 'p NAB 65:y4'� U�.Bo w W, Ob` Y S+QaJ N. YY N c w 5 g lu Q r� y�¢�[ N.S c �gy N .pVYY f�Y YD'G•.,' uayi 01 u- Y.�■••-LC FS •� � M YpD yC 4y oL �u 6yupTpI tO ppL�LG p Y ^. 6 Q9 A �pp O1 u.O+ w... O YJO> •�.RCO<_ bg 40'.y� N✓0 YOpY O 31• {�..Y!•a.1tlS p.Y�. IL�O•bi Ks 3.1--i Ir+91 Y �VWL `�0C{wN ��9YnQ VI N m.. Y a = I �o�. ev ap a^a NO Ya Mo. yY "m Pn db o yoV a..ri � O I [+`1 O9:5 ��� a .y v=S 1, F. a"a. T�N- u� ►r► c. Y+ Lam. �:3a .N Yam a po.a -5 D._p� .Yp.y ± 0 Y ►V r G N u- D^ W. if O p04VV > Sv �OCC D= o E • ►_ 'eb:Y:4 C$ =Z au j�Y O.a 0CN UW YN 6V-- Oy Y qp C Uy p►C �y•a:Y = YVC y$ N O E YV S Q QLp Sa N V E00 tl YD a O ' 4y 0 a> c ^D v a S L 6-` `E y a$o a .� r a Y w '$Y :p9'Y Yo <«.� m V'p^y v,ra " -six a n - ^.D..� `C w DI u6uVV:� M O. S+M yp L�q ` N]tO O.•n?` I y 6w0 d4 ,T 4Y Y DI'• ]•• O Y �� �' o �'o a: ► ^•s c.. new EcE�"«y n` P Y C C�V I u T �Y.yl� ar C y O4 V1r ►�L �1 C O 4 �•+ y- _ Ny V Y Ob...-O n b Y C E Ot EO � YN 1. .SOY a t V C '^ W NV D y^.� OS�� L aQ4 b LCdHT DyIO PCY ao(Dp�QE, 1'Np Yr NN � S�� C �9C+C, O Y M E C• E.-•• L fY O V E► � - ,6� G b N� V W Y. W G I 6 Y�y �f ►I 11 ��f �I � ►1 Nf �f o �� �Ni �Mf �f�7 Y k S o a sC K tYyyy "Or Iz yy � Y w 4Q u Jai^ pO• V ` H1�,� M is v 6a ,�$ uE MM ;®x It ywUjQAV �dC St ot o Lo H o m'■` neaC j pR�Cp o •H• _� m a A o� u Ve ic.�i�a G O. YY Y �w w w..U^ =9IG �Y4H qi �COQ U VC Q G V. L �.C. O. Cy VAC Sw V CO E � 0�. YjqCfrr� L4.Q, YC �rY �0�01 NYL'gC ey Ca ^C OV 8w Mp .p� U gUHO O7p�p Y .�HyM <C:k CMG Hp . J e c6 rV.. 0\HC �H. 4•T OV� ` rpQ�QM � • N piw."- _ uE .,Wall ` L6tlr u a� t �u�eV� L 'nq plee..C= V VQc p 6� Vr■■ ^A N� ti .+OHb^p yOL? a GG6 NO -V aw 'G Cy NL He ` = u �Suii poQ> umL `-wq N.VQN^ S w0 CCH@+� C�sx N i V 7 1 �� n U 6• P b ti CLi w Win.. YLS ns <._. -t`0 ¢c+u t F V i V �a. W,p,,c 1•Q� O y t �4iJ .O.w y �� NYiL 1Y.G QGY M. 6SSa .Q. �j •. Q4 iL t9$3' Miy� sn po. 8V v4+- N 4-. r i .�C`, T y4,!� 4�. { f ~ y'M2 5trY1 �.� � NY �Nb~1.. � •'i O 4+yA'ba. Y QM w1..^ LL' �� yy� 44 e1 YY� 4A Y6 AL eC4.3 4 iv a Im IV ii r*� a�■��� �, e� .pa `"' a oYs �u g5 q�pq y pp O L i" p • 1�•M L Y y M Y Tj aT . Q'C .+y 4 m !�! L4 ^W +yyJ:y��, +K'O. yy�.wylyp�..p�� MSC Lq r F�L tq uY Q. yYi- J[C D• y�Oq �w rOi.Z��i LC w..Y.iyt4YG Siy CLN -sac yC V. rq6. .V'�i'gqIL 4p L�44od xV H .�n�M�yyyy � 4.{, CYCw 48 R'G L f�jOj pCc4�.4L K�.v Syr. S`.LJYC� L Zs i 4.• �D.. fJ~. q0 V b.M C iCVCOQ4 ^ N OM�aL NV ALrt !Y ►^C i•Y 24 NNL 7r4 4 SL i V 'rN YW #GN Aoz � 4s vm .45 i a4 t 7�. � yam,iR 7�. ^'. Kyc' ♦♦ Di iL A Dt P 1`0.. C _ yjG 1f1 `ML Y N pp O. .� L� d 4 Z 0.� � q=�a w� a�. +`-�� u 48 n r,; i'>,,,yyY.'�" ^uwCC Ap q�$�. ^D►,.Q' I x 8.YC� C 0 N Y .►'J "�'.Yy�.. i Nyy Y C i. 4 •.G of LqC .w •N.'� `M. $D� Y.� C D� N.p.! CCC 9.�.Y , `^ K QC w s 4� �4¢•r ,aaV�' T4L pK 4N i iFL N N42 V`S I�.Ru« YL .c 4 <� pla �YQ �e Y V.� � 4 '•'yLD fi ti�4 Y L 1..,� Y �~ Q9K C VN w LyY 4 O'N 9y/ iy yC ,C y,CyN Lr+ C�� 42a� <wi W-A O {�1�■ 11. W U�� "" rV Y tT V yb< 4 5, N4W w.r0. KG4Dii t C ♦� N C V 0 cs n 77aaCC VON O _ II� p o� F4� 9yYn. E1`CL�Of l J. L.Y a' Ny yYN V Y. E�auOy s�.c.. c'.'v ap >~Y u v$. :•- Y u it'_ c v N, o'Lo '4 of utlfi a�4 N 'o �o 5 a'r- Y C 4 Cti w Q VC. II.ZN t41n^ � YYCa YN. ■G■YY V OV OV •U C✓II p. Yy Ws V 9VY L NY �� �. 0.� yy^ C 7�•� I �r NN T N � _ o i I �► _I I 1 RESOLUTION NO. 'A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CO*17.SSION OF THE CITY OF l RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REQUEST FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A VA;IANCE, NO. 86-05, -FOR A'VARIANCE TO A` REDUCTION OF THE MINIMUM AVERAGE LOT SI7E, THE MINIMUM LOT WIDTH, THE MINIMUM,-COR►tER 0T WIDTH, AND THE_MINIMUM LOT DEPTH FOR A 57 LOT' SUBDIVISION ON 33.2 ACRES WITHIN THE VERY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF SAPPHIRE STREET, SOUTH OF JENNET STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AND KgKTNG FINDINGS SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals (i) WALTON CONSTRUCTI04 has filed an application for the issuance of a Variance, No. 86-05, described in the title: of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolu"inn, the s0ject variance request is referred to as "the application". (ii) On November, 12, '1986, the Planning Cottmissior of the City of Rancho Cucamonga condFur*ed�.a duly noticed public hearing on the s:bject matter, of the application, ti', said public hearing was concluded prior to the adoption of this Res . iJn. Affik -r` ( ii) A1' ya,-prerequisites,to the 'adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is found determined and resolved , ve by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as f4i lows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the tacts sct forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. This Commission hereby finds and c4.­rifies teat the project has been reviewed and considered In compliance with the C lifornia Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and further finds and roncurs with a6 Negative Declaration adopted with respect to this project on Movembet 12, 1936. 3. Based u,on substantial evidence presented to this-Co ,fission, during the above-referenced November 12, 1986, hearing, including written and oral staff reports, torether with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follow: a. The application aoplies to p property located on the west side of Sapphire 'Street, south of Jennet, consisting of 33.2 acres and is Aft currently vacant; -50 PLANNING COWISSION RESOLUTION NO, 1T 10349 M°;LTON`CONSTRUCTIO;i Noveimber 12, 198 Page 2,` y b. The properties to the north, south, east, and west are presently designated for residential uses and are curr_ntly developed with ,> various single family dwellings; C. The applica.ion i.a designed to facilitate the division of said 33.2 acres into 57 residential parcels`and has been submitted in conjunction with -a request for the approval of Tentative Tract .Map No. 10349 (approved November 12, 198�). Such an action as contemplated, 7n coniunction with the fpl i c�A,on, conforms to the General Plan of the City'of Rancho Cucamonga a.4d is a permitted;use within,+llie Very Lore Residential .District; d. The application has been submitted to allow the following: 0) A reduction in minimum average lot siz6`for said Tract Map No. 10349, contrary to the requirements of section 17.08,040 of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code requiring tracts with n the Very Low Residential District to have a minimum average, lot size of 22,500 square feet ,n area.; ` (ii) A reduction is minimum lot w.40h--for lots 33, 55, 40, and 42 for said Tract. Mao Nq. 10349, contrary to the requirements of',section I 17.08,.040 of the Rancho Q)camonga Development Crde requiring lots within the Very Low Residential,gisirict to have a Tot width of a minimum eighty (80) feet; t (iii) A reduction in minimum comer lot width for lots 1 and 57 for said Tract Map No. 10344,1 contrary to the requirements of section 17.08.G40 of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code requirin_ lots within the Very Low Residc-r tial District :to have a corner Tat -width of a minimumr one hundred (100) feet; (7v) A reduction in minimum lot depth far lots 16. 18, 19, 45 and 46 for said Tract Rap uo. 10349, contrary to the requirements of section 17.08.040 of the Rancho Cucamonga Deve`opment Code requiring lots wits",.the Very Low P-.3dential District to have a lot depth of a minimum on_ ,.+dred fifty (150) feet. e. The variance as specified fn the application will rot contradict the goals or objective of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan or Development erode and will not promote a detrimental condition to the persons or property in the immediate vicinity of the subject site for the reaso;ts as follows: 0 Y Several tracts adjacent to the subject site have been appro,+riately developed utilizing lots which do not neet the existing minimmn average lot size standards; M) Several lots adjacent to the subject site have been appropriately developed utilizing lots which do not meet the existifrq minimum lot. Idth standards; Ambk (iii) The Master Plan of trails reflects that a north/south I community trail shall be provided cor+currsntly with the development of the J i w PLANNING COMMISSION ,RESOLUTION NO. TT 10349 WALTON CONSTRUCTION November 12, 1986 Page 3 subject site. Said trait is to be dedicated along the Sapphire Stre_t `rortage of the proper thus reducing, the area to allow c;-,npli'ance with minimum corner lot width standards; (iv) The +Master Pan of trails reflects that an east/west community trail shalt be provided concurrently with the development of the subject site. Said trail is to be dedicated along the north boundary of the property thus reducing. the area to, allow compliance with minimum lot r',�;,tl. standards; (v) Several lots, adjacent to the subject site have been appropriately developed utilizing lots which do noL;neet the existing minimum t ct depth standards; and (vi) At thz above referenced November 12, 1986, public hearing, no public testimony was set forth in opposition to the application; 4. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced Mov�v. ber„"2, 1986, public hearing, and upon the specific findings of fact set forth in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, above., this Commission hereby finds add cld;acl odes as follows: a. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in a practical diJiculty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code; b. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved, or to the intended use of the property, that do not apply generallvt to other properties in the same district; C. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified reguiatioit would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by owners of-other properties in the same district; d. The .granting 10 the subject Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. z. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in rzragraphs :, 2, 3 and 4 above, ;he Commission hereby approves the application. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROYCO AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GO;+3AIS5ION R�SOLU�ION - ., ., PLANNNO WALt4N C01�5tRUGtI4N F 10349 govem6 12, a986 Page 4er r '• 3 ag.rman .t gY. enn�s ou r eCretary of ,the Gity of A ESQ ra u:r er. epu GoSsj ssi on io was d of ti�e uly and , ;. �, of the PSanoregbirig gesol�Ci'S''0n held S�•,retary hat the f the Plannin9 comm, h do h�vebY certify t d by ta?�nin9 Brad Bu11Er. Deo ced% assed+, and. 0,' I of the P Rancho Cucamcjgar u�,ar meet �Iowi vote-to-� s regularly intr ��camon9a. at 19S by the f of Rancha `of November, city he 12th day COt�ISSIOhENS'S '' AYES: C4"KI5SfONERS: j NOES: GO ISSIONE0 i1 ABS�HT AOL q t� . l ,i r /jt E- CITY OF RA.NL CHO CUCAMOATGA_ GL o STAFF REPORT ✓ �' Z f ��> 'RATE: November 12, 1986 1977 M, Chairman and Members of the Planning Comrnissian FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott *1r0ny, Ass stknt'Kann�sr' SUBJECT: ENVIRON44TAL ASSESSMENT AND TENATIVE TRACT MAP 1.3316 - ,EGORDOR -IV;(As ors A of subdlsvis on ef 16 parcels on 5 acres rµ„ o Tand in the Low 9ea�sity Residential District 1.2-4 "+ �. dwelling units per acre), located at the southeast corner of.Hermosa Awenve,and Manzanita Drive - APN 261-14-28- yJ I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: ;. Action Requested: Approval of subdivisfrn nesicil, Concept'jal Grading.PIan an issuance of,a negative decl arati on for-�i6 lot custom subdi;vision. ) B. Project Density- 3.4 dwelling units per(net acre. C. Surrounding Land. Use and Zonin : arth, SiYig I a family reside iai (proposed),,Low Densi"-V Residential Q-4 du/ac) South Vacant, Low.0erg1ty Residential (2-4 du/ac) East Single (under construction), Low Density Resi dontri al (2-4•du/ac) West - Single family r4sidential,°Very Low Density Residential- (less than 2 du/ac) D. General Plan Designations: Project Site :',Low Density Residential (2-4'du/ac) North Low Density+ Residestt"ial (2-4 du/ac) South - Low Density Residential (2-4 du/A�*) East Low Density 'Residential (2-4 du/ac) West - very Low flensity Residential (less than 2 du;ac) E. Site Characteristics: The site is currently vacant with a 6•,7% sl7pe Eros, nor fouth. I ITEM-1 "'ate' ^*+mr '� .-r<y}.�s4,x, ��y.,+�'• � � ,r� ...,.. , i Chairman and Members.of Planning Cotmti,sion ' M..318 November i?;' 1986 E Page 2 ' 11. ANALYSIS: , A. General: The project is being developed as Custom';\Lot Subdivision with 16 lots�ringfng ire size from 7,200 square fleet to 10,775 square feet in,'lea. The average-lot size within dime _'. tract will be 8-.1M square'feettiin area, 'Ue project will take access off of Hermosa Avenue and will tie-in With the tract to t the east;(1OD27Y that Is currently und2r constructi'an. B. Design Review Committee* {he,;'Design 'nevi*-Cawittee reviewed thee project an October Fu, 1986, and recommended approval subject to a condition requipinq the deletion of the building setback lines frcsam, the tentative tract-map. 'The Committee stated .that- the building ; setbacks. should be; reviewed . in conjunction, with the' Design Review, for proposed residences. The Committee also recommended apnrovai of t�, trading Plan stalling that the.,plan was in keeping with the grading being &.4a on adjoining'iprop€rties. r C. EnA ronmental Assesimentr, Staff :has ccxpleted the NO ronmental ChectIM1,114 found no significar�- adverse I nvironmental impacts as, ak result of this project. If the Comhmmissi;:.n co;xcurs.1 with' tt se findings, the issuance of a Negative Dpclaration'wsuld 6e in order if,-the Tentative Tract Map is approved. III. fU S FOR HIDINGS: The ,project is consistent with the;+General Plan and Dev-elopmen Code. The project, with the added mitigation measures, will not be detrimental to the public hearth or safety, or cause nui"rtces or significant adverse environmental impacts. i In addi,tiron, the proposed: use and site plan, together, with the recommended "conditions of ',a proval, are :r ,compliance with the applicable provisions of the t'vvelopmmment Cade and City Standards, IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This items has been advertised in The Daily Report newspaper as r, public hearing and notices weve sent to all ptoper`ty nwrmers tfittiin 300 fee; of the project site. N. RECUMENDATIOY: Staff recommends the`Planning Corm fission approve r en a ve ract Map 13318 through adoption of the attached F resolution YAM conditions of approval and issue a negative deciarhti or.. qW Chairman and Members of Planning Commission November 12, 1986 TT13318 Page 3 i 4ad tfully ed BrBui"er City planner g6•SM:vc Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilizatt,)n Map Exhibit "B" - Tenative Tract Map Exhibit"C" - Conceptual Grading Plan Resolution of Approval With Conditions I gyp, r fa + tz `'. 5. NIIr7L. —sow-am conar"An PI� NE hp �,V}±NE �{l i CITY OF RANCHO CUCACA UION GA TrrLE. S, PLANNING DRf ISEN EKtiIB*I': f}' q - _ SCALI1 .t II . . arr. tx an •.t ew. ', „; uss �� r Tv— AsIlk r» i .. 13 ijf r l h� . ..,., .. . l♦♦i `' .Is f Lc c• !o _ s, �1 i C�. NORTH CITY OF i crrr\t: T' � RANCHO CUC ANT I©NGA Tr ru- �•-�v�s��t4-' PLANNING DW SM EXHIBIT .9- SGiLL is !•� !a•+� �ar � �... it ist I� �� matt '}tta.Y . 1 1• �sa,l -w J� � `f� \`__ �- "' '1�'.�---- - - - '.• tom u"rs�*:`r '' � ° "'__'•�n'r! a !" tts cwal �( ��..i-' � i � � • �.�' �n � !�rc�.t! 5` � =�`)� � �� 1 \ `'�'�'�•-- � _� � ;� �� � �: If+ ,t �g ��� .ram+', rr �. Ia!lY . iat � 9Y tes. _.f f_ ✓ �,s� � • " —�• �� T -"��J�lSW-� .ram ��M M�}J'H. �..1M J La a CITY Oit fTF- -- R •1.ItiCHO CUCAMONGA TrrLE: PLAMING DTVbclCNEXHI3Ii'= ,'' J SSA\LE f � %_� is } '+. (`• ; ` ���• ' 7 __ ,�... `f . TY QI _ 7'L'NN[\G EXHtBFt'= -: 7 SCALE,- r _, ti ;> III CITY OF, rrc� RANCH} CUCAK[OiNGA TrrLE= az +� PLAM, ING DWTSK)LN EXHIBIT-C-`. SG\LE -- pa - RESOLUTION NO. r, A ktS6t-.t:'1-I0N OF THE PLANING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO GUCAMONG&; G:ILIFORNIa;, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING ?ENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13318 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 13318, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Kim Gordon, appl- cant, for the purpose of subdividing the real pN''perty situated.-in the City of�Rancho Cucamonga, County of Sat* Bernardino. State of California, described as a residential subdivision of 16 tots on 4.76 acres of t land located on the southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and Mahzanita Drive, z regularly Damn befog the Planning Commission for public hearing end action an November 18: 1986; aid WHEREAS, thi,"-ity Planner has recommended approval of thL dap subject to all conditions ' sew- th i 4- the Engin ring and Planning Division's reports; and W rEREAS, tNe Planning CoWssion has ree and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hear<ng. i ' NOW,, THEREFORE, 'ate , PT ianrIng Coarnission of the Cit1' of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve'as follows: SECTIOA 1; The Flannin( Commission makes:the following findings in, l regard to Ten at.ive Tract No. 13318 and the Map ther>Nof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Developa'tent-,tode, and specific plans, (b) `R .t design or impwWements of the tentative tract is consistent with the'General Plan, Development"Code, and specific 'Plans; (c) 11f, site is, physically suitable for the type of devetopment'proposed (d) -The design of the subdivision is not like11+ to cause j substantial environmental damage ,and avoidable injury to humans and wild? fe or their habitat; .'e The'tent&tive tract is not l *ely to cause serious public healxh problems*, M rThe design of the ter,7ative track-;-w,11 not conflict with a;o easement acTuired by tie public at Large,' now of record, fat:, acces_- thvough or use of the 1, property within th&"(; oposed subdivision. 'I Alh R` «<n' $i t: J R RESOL':lTION t. 1 TT13318 {"r F" Page,2 m (g) ,That this project will `not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued, SECTION 2, Tentative Tract Map No. 13318, a copy of which is attached hereto. is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard;"fonditiensz PULNNING DIVISION: 1. The bolding setback lines shall, be deleted from the ` crap .prior to recordation, ENGINEERING DIV�I-SION: 1. The Alta I sad4isins, located to the soath of the, ?1 site, shaii be excavated to ,provide sufficient storm water retention to off-set the Increased runoff generated by the development or an in-lieu fee shall be paid to the City prior, to recordation of the Final Flap. 2, The existing overhead uti-1 ties (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Hermosa Avenue shall be underground from the fivst pole on the north side of Manzaoito Drive to th` first pole south of the projeC. ''boundary prior; to public ` %provement accepipanco"r or" occupancy, whichever occurs first. Reiraburs, nt of one-half the adapted cost of undergroundi�,g frOn future development as it occurs .on the oppox wi,' . slta of the street is not feasible because *o property is presently developed. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12'�H DAt` OF NOVEMBER, 1986. PLANNIK COMMISSIMI OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary to RESO!UTIOR TT13318 i Page_3 Srad dui'ler Rancho Cucamon , Deputy; cretar regularlY introduced here Y of,the Planning City of by certify that C w`n the Rancho Gecamon gassed, and adopted forego,, Ission of the I2th day of Nov9a' at a and arpted b.Y the Pla Resolution ass duly of AYES; * er•• 1�86, by the fol meetinow the PIan9 COMMISsion of and C,MISSIOmERS n nntng Co�issiari the MOES:, R vote-to-wit: held aBsErrr: COMMISSIONERS, COMISSIONERS: r r Y T in. au�.V D . .♦c �r-u�v Oa u . E✓> a �� V t3 .5 zram'.,O Cytl ✓4A -In- = i LPL \ wMr. oBC SiY LV�VYJ O�. p+NV O6. JO ^ 9. OC a i all iN p�C NOM Y' V 'EO GOOO O•u:,aC yO.aa� C M�YO yCtl �.p Cr.�. �. �q� ✓ a1� CO (c C\+w A CSY = _V O O''09E gS✓ wC y.O wtLUVV iCY C ;OS ^qNS � 2.0 C �Y. b�Ory.. p06aV ter.. p 'G a Y } Oa10a/�� .0 O�U 64 ly^. A ♦�..Q R, Rq L LC... a 4 U p CJ u' O*00 E �N u.L V'0.. L W` ✓O O C O Ys. CC -u L V L\is�L—:V.�i. 6.Z, aq=0 N� L N Z y c. C. NKM +Ci WCes^ a C g Y L .y+yJC +y O. .. c0� qq LC qyQ> O YCO: ^GYV OJ���C�Y�. P�� ✓C�✓ CyL. � �n Gt? .q�. N � 4 t 4 � C r o'YL Otl> —C.0 .UO��Ie+ YYN ^.1:GCU.46Oi pV.tl. p zL.OU i0 M L +O. O VYC -OCC M p— O pw qC O`Va bC9 C.A Nrr. .� N'.P[ +9�YK ao +d V VV -a" G. _F a G !!��®® y. b a O LC CU •6 abo". °�'✓C? LpCa1cY.Nu..'O�O 60 M. 6L �_~C • OC O y r3 ".0 GG COO r�Y: b.^�2SO'J Y dM pV uCp+aC YM. �n4ag0 ^9 9.1 C L =.Y Cal Cxt�. .pp C iii :C L q y L Y U pp p, ■C q o `a y O r i G' C V Z i\ O w ds. O.aI Ll arr yy O M -• d O b.1a R. 9 4 L u u B r N Y L fi�C6 4 a�i CC� Yb S �L � c s ads �LwL �e oar liVOGy Y O Ciu. ee.0 Y.�O�CZ%�j CCO Z3 CCOC C sQC Jay a■C� �O.O. cYNY.Y+� Nrp NL ZZNa/Ll � 4ai. rYr..� W... F '6C JCL Vw�y N6O. N YI C i AM E eT S��$Jg wrNY=a. N ✓'�—`yN Y oYi L� Yg a$ `$y.3"•o•u .c_qa Z. w M o\' sao r! -q,a-"co .,y`�eggfi u�a� oJq �a �" r a�' +ice ...ra�. Ncpq oy as + � _ a-- L.ea.ua 63 ,VC gC�Ae V L�YC� Y.yNWV VO.� H. W<C 4=NON- - OV Op O 9 CS C'u C - �06a9�(`.4 'CCi O✓yam.L-9 �.Q.Q .w—® j 2 oq. V> = G gip. dp tYff. yMO y V6p '.a- 4YO C= na oa uqs. ue. oas.F. bv ant usga~y`'p' o cou c `o~MS ^pC q gU O V FilC C 9 N U 9 7�.y B aw Y V a >4 Y 0 0 Y✓V L O w6 — p4L�a 0 Y C V V 6>C Q C O n 6C J n O L D O O V V T V 6 V M V Lp V Y N Y p Y——a O.✓�u N C 4 �,w.ft Sw <Y b6Vwr x �i AO P LO U O� u. USN uG-. C F�UY N ^S l Y a G r O L'.4. O i!N^gga 9C Sy O Cc` c^a'`.a�� M' U6CC �N N tlN O PO PP+{p OYY^L GeLC� Q g090 + `N y Dn a sa Yv.+c +$ F pY a ^ P't^.p la V� �i � YO Ot 4M N.0 >L�.v�1 � •bw� ��.. Yo22 , _eg aaw C et ^L N tl y N Y Gc y Q1,- eY, UC Cd ^V u N Y Q N 4 4 f� +N j `4+O O^ 0 9 a i O N T a:: N Y T^ G zr y •.v Yivd... LC4.- Y w9y O. LOI�' OVNT =Sp^V Ca�a�. NUpptlYN@�. C yCi_'=i ■i. ag +OOpC �,y]G�o 0.9C Ym LO �� rGLCr ON La��: LgC.Y:G • ,L„OSM G,O w�u Cl O. g a e QH qN •fin•(, F ��1y N V Y S 9 tl '.—S.- 1 S �C w�i Yp O PC^L•D LCM Or C44N�LL.0 yn OA M Vp PNNtl� 67 �Yoir Y' ��G4 •: Y9 L`• t ��`.fN! LYO Y� Y p�M .:.pi 4>+Y:1� Vp^$ 3 O Im CE Y VC�CL iUORW S,w«: NOS ^DC�YnL ea, C$'q 0.v E++' `•ice..{{��V l M {M$�- HNN. <N1 .0. 7tM0 FNi <N Yam.�.LNI•A{T VN <tl :O Y 'li C OON a^ afi3 a.v ski v. c� �T. Y o L.r7 Nx It D_ uMw NU YC.' cL CY NG OLq. V�Y� Y OCa Y'_> q a7 8.9 0 p. y �o _ _v .tqi M"t :.e'4 ca o.TZA: $�` w^ Ld�N4i0Y rOii c tl. q O V �a a�li .� �.tl S iv Mi NL �� CCe�... A.. i R cs w 6 c 9 C.N lid. S LZ.I p G p N= +y q G q+ S y V A Y i S C A 'O C _Z. = O pp D i V 5 1 S r— • i G O L J . Z O i L S L C Y +V 1 S Y L C C My V O.N 0>6+ L C f•6 N - P Y N y CC y^ 9 U Y D p� MQ _ •Y. N')�i p,CN V CI Cq Opp L Y ^ V ± yp4 �rpC CC y.CNN= YGO G...qy ^ Z 4 C ^ �.�� 4 �y T Y` G ggi' r,�~�,e `°' o•c� n'" u'YL. <rNO <9w.m 9 40 n h O.M <Y <S rON�� NCO tvw. y N i YTi w+OT my�a d Tv rn•-e ar. uv i dle cc d e+ A dw N gyY+ ^.p L~Ciw2F yr11r '^y .,pGp•"o% �as VVI ya�V ` _Ia 4Jd+ s- ar Tw ally Cur. '6�`�d Y�Y99 Id.3. C aG '9.e Od VydCpu Y,o LNY 4Vi u pd:.G.0. u'ibR1 ^O�y • DO. vS G ty c 0000� u EWaE =cudY c Y:v iirjeauG�deew...w `a �`a M Y (Z L C U C a J p, C M ,,, .4.. iva m3Y- tFE t,7 aovy ua> .66G oa"n,� u yv -- .D N ` Gup 'y Cxr &LC W G.O �MNYw E.+N�.e A 0 seo u'li KI9,g a 5poy pm `dY2. a Q• CV= CQC Q4i Cyaya V.gY 9c J r.'OO,•IY VIA C» Cr-a' Q V V T f/ - NU { . 1: a 0. 4l1 �?. Lp W U�wa ,^.'�� N.:G•�y4 ��{{ rJ p Q Ya Q fZ 9. Lw Oi _S ISE pye�y. Max aq�G „.�xY• dLOwmy pY '^Oi1a� y�i d� Sd w. `�r CS KSL t2 V �oJ•y*•O �'d 7G N w u k-' pw N�fl Lri:. lY S. GCC NLL �pp • tl Me Ma ^ V 'Y7Y. SNfM Y6A C Y O w6�C Z �'�rCr aWNpI LL VYN d� r 9. c •.�. $,��.. 4y� LM + s m 4r._s S ai33r v.' a.0 Vmz� NET cl ,v� ro 43hli oar pene$iS iC QPi Ai s a a+ u aL cE2k s a Ito �O N^ XT —6 aM i `. -.9 M CC L Y 4 Vri p ua=:� • P«.g 70 N6 $w a:Pi. V `y ,9 q'`:i v Y N m w"rt �, y'd" ...� ' t' �4.`r•- •iV, n _ „�� Bpi - da Y a— YL N� 4 CC C CC EC at Ma uu iS �V{ L"4r� w" LV i Cp yw C.v 5 ,a yy ~CV • VJ2nO�.Y Etw. CU bz= V^CrW yp7 O CMY =b{% . ate+ sau6w aril pal y Q p L y S Z a— p t C.O v 4 .A A 9 .rG N1 �i 6 g V.29 an S �a.� a ...,g`C'y O yyV.O. V; _ ---1 Ti 4 a T _ „� 4 4a C: µy.L Y P NN.ad S.i. NMG i Qw m Y 0 Av _ yY {1 G .G 6�► ~.F: rV1.Y. YVir6m OEOV .�. �9.dy 4Y�M �qV.{ 45 cN �'iw " o vv a'•w M GpY cw N�9�. a rroN ` ao 6 i L c ie� '�-c p ♦s v@ p:N �„ nw a' a.0 r'a n' v ado. m Aa sT. ll NE W IS Ord Ta ,a �TCd�fl ��n rw' Fo". ud "w.+. -wMi dS Y.b yV O r G.Ed ^ G•G tz— ND� R� a.. NW ~�.2. NM7C w 4 c O G y w 4V Gb.Gd a C ..�y �pd• TgCg TGO �uT� L Y G V M a Y L O V w G d M d L MDi= 01 L Y L u N~ L all 4 C II N Y yy pp L G M y`b+pE,Ep M JL8`^ C YV iC40YN^ WY4 W�l iYMV r: jr h pyg Y O C p Q N O w Y}•.� O 46 CM1•�Y ` O• ,... Yb cu YQ10 au L vppOOOO�1r Sewe V y 9C� v QC �Y.CY vO qyp: O M N w KpsµY 9 ,. Y..4C •i C lYY r� .C �G y Gi W C p N e w L Y y M 61 Yy+ `YLY...O Oqy L Cyp O• Oy'm OG L� Y GML01 69w _ orb � ..L � CY YVL 1u jey� Y « N µ]Y L C C�w' �� �•` S N = � tf G�e� O y a`WcyEZ rn0 Y1 N S Y C O i Y C..Y N Y w r 4 L Y 1 N y aaa' . .$e6N+«a s'. +S o� CC tly$YQ$ gp/ Y•� eC L;. ` y�i[O ANC '.V Y CSC Qd�y{ GS M Y.Q q G'M.zzx }+ v Y rn o• gin. 6 YY b rn rnM ra.A L Ow' N 8. 4 p.Q F. ` 1. T C O O ub� M �Lrn. • rn1m mYw . .Lim ii Y.G. C�N v � O•w. b� � C`M�. aYL+ }'y�9y =L• Q A u� vo �. p 4� y•.• 9yt tg Y.p p 'O N•r Y C as C N 0 q=4• d'S�� FC.�K YApE Or C^H6 •'6t Pa ++ w.y "� �+�Y .wr Q.a6 O.�d�d�2 N O 3 Y c► > > W6 rnV. gp C f. YO YasY Opb p Q OmM Ld «.�•441 �N G..�• �ppYyM .OVEN Y�S.Cnd Y �{{rr O N a��� �•w.l G� �.P• `� y Y 80 7�N G L C.� •O N A W Y M COY 7N�' e��✓ NY Pi O^.Y L 1- NYV1it� <7w0 06'rB�"L wNV WU{OJ ,6 S'LJa 6= Ask ,i X_,4 p +�.+y p,„ O OI.• p L. pew S G \ YOOOOOOvb,� o�: �,$y� a$ �Lo�" � � ,,� ' i Sna •g� v • 9 —e LaA Yl = Nq'`^ 9 Y—L iY.. CY�c Y�xq 'O q. 6e S L4e -„•� � — N„.• C 01 � C 9 �s ` $ o �r coY`�a fi w �Yopii € y Le �a URw w 11. „ Yp W -.. N O V g u ` a ; O Y w p a. ■S +o ' �.'4. S = 4,•• 14 A O m ±N CC jx CC. �O �_Y CC3. pu 1yy O■pppn■ L.Y f� Eli W a M w 1 V+ L o L O .•�. »..�..� }Y';.cr„ 'u�3p$frcT '�'+ �... ate. u a��C '� .�i A' iC � '-upyC ]•S CM VC y6YI Y G�—FiYL C�~ �O Oyyl1uuL • L{t ipd NW + u•`.Y—W.CW. fp.yy 4 S — —Y@ ^.� 6. —`L av� ¢¢Y -+. �.•. W t Y Y aC1 LY tppVt.�a VI Orr•... vlp i0� 6H +.— :W••n4Vld sppL t'.w� V FwOiYW KRa QM � • N n1u Y E c p `. nn qS+ +d C � Od • �+i rpYOr wr _<s ai yaa`` bQO. Hit, p Y Big pY.S.V d V•Xz to .H Sw NY CVC _ W .+ Y O TV ::YYYi S..NU N 6W S=. •(G{y u S Y�y I �14i W� 0 v -n 0 R a t� op ee L `p V fi 06 N p/C C 000 V 4! uaq aov cg. o v.. E yy- A.t Oay� yUyJ � � 0.• w p G�� YnYY "r L«} pp •Y Y� 4 COQC d, U y O y G� 6"' ���.` � .4 iR.p. LLB.. rs. ` p �ac N=s •�• C tn'` n c L ,4 Lt Nri S. Y V o OI u r ^O Y 8 ` O. m u —Y -^ V Y— U o C N L r.j�Q.y `Q O N8V «�qaq9 YQ�u yZ "��Yvo„uo 5a; M'u" ' ou` CLq\ p0L` Y-'Y pN 40 �V�yyM tl a'y GC � Y CYL ^74 Q,r yy CC—p �.0 �LO.•. 9� 6 LV wy L Y—s �� UU Ypp C. 'V.O1�N 6Z OErp Yw r GY Y� � ACCc Ca �� �� YG�L.. ✓Y�'•` s:W6�. KE GNv» f� E.0 �� 4..pi Y.O 'r�O1L F2•N.a �AO Q: — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CAA STAFF REPORT �z DATE: Novembe, 12, 1186 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Debra Meier, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: COMOITIONAL USE PERMIT 86-12 - WESTERN SERVICES COMPANY - eestablishment, o an automobile leasing office in an existing building,. with a lease space of 3,750 square feet on 1.66 acres of land in the General Industrial .District (Subarea 4) located at 9375 Archibald - APa 210-U71-47. I. ABSTRACT: This item was referred by the City Council to the anPl—"ning'Commission for discussion and res6 ution of t�- parking issue of the above described subject.' I1. BACKGROUND,. The Planning Commission, at its meeting on July 23, con ucted a public hearing to approve Conditional Use Permit 86-12. A condition added at the meeting prohibited tovernight parking of leased vehicles. However, the applicant was not present at the meeting for discussion of the added condition. The Planning Commission, being unable to continue.,this item without applicant's consent, conditionally approved the project. Consequently, the { applicant appealed this coneitian-and was heard by the CityCouncil at their meeting of October 1,` 1985. The Council concurred that since the applicant ;had not been available at the Planning Commission meeting to discuss alternate solutions to prohibiting overnight parking, -they have referred this item back to the , Planning Commission for further discussion. r The purpose of the conditior prohibiting overnight parking was to avoid parking problems that had been experienced by other businesses within this center. Specifically, leaving vehicles and trailer items on site for several days at a time. Although there is another condition limiting them to the usage of a maximum of 15 spaces at any one time, that alone was not =een as a completely enfordeable solution. Whereas, it would be evident if several vehicles were overnight for several days at a time. To date the applicant has not provided alternatives or solutions to the potential parking problem. i f . EM J Chairman and # MbeM"' of;the Planning Commi sston November 12, 1986 * CUP 86-12 Page 2 a, x• III,--CORRESPONCENCE: �; s item has been ready ti7,,ed as a public hearing Cal,y _Report newspaper. the Rroperty posted(land notices sent o all- proper— y oHmers within �QO feet of the project. „ ✓`" IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recoine'nds that the Planning Commission consider 1T-Tnput regarding. this project. Should the Planning _ Commission delete or add conditions of epproval, ,the attached Resolution 86-109 would have to be amended. Resp;Bulr rad City Planner BB:DM:vc Attachments: Applicant's Letter of Appeal Letter f m Property Owner Planning Co ission .5taff Report and Minutes` i1 July 23,,1986 Resolution No. 86-10y f l (714) 945.9712 (800) 325-5682 r, WWF1E36 Atile o Corp.ouice s 9375 Archibald Ave..Ste.108,Rancho Cucarnanga,CA 9173 08/01/86 CITY 4F RANCHO CUCAMONGA � A1N INISTRATKfiN_ City of Rancho Cucamonga AN Pit:r 04 1985 i T Off2Li�of the City Clerk P.Q.BoX B0?' Rancho-z.acamonga,Ca.q 1730 Dear Ms,Beverly Authelet As a results of the July 23 public hearing bAfore the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission,resolution$6-103,conditional use permit 86-12,we, Auk Western Services Company,Laze exception to section 3 paragraph 2 concerning overnight parking. While.the Planning Commission saw fit to approve our conditional use permit,section 3,paragraph 2,"....overnight parking or storage of lease vehicles--shall be prohibited*',severely limits our ability to conduct hvsiness in a normal manner, Further is creates an addition burden by foftini us to find another suitable,secured area for overnight parking.We would Nike to exercise our right to appeal this condition by having you place this matter on the city,council calendar for their consideration. I have anciosed the necessary fees in connection with this appeal. upon confirmation of a hearing date,please provide notification so that I may adequately address this issue before the city council. Very truly yours; :spencer L_Brovm 3G Vice President,Finance J -3 IANN Com Auguat L, 1986 ;y Rancho Cucamonga City Council SA� pa 9320 Base_:ae Road ' P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 9173D Dear Council: The owners of the officV,Park at 9375 Archibald known as Archicenter have no objIuction to Western Au'6) 3Leasing parking cars in the parking Lot after business hours. We feel it is adv nta9vous to have the vehicles parked in ert 1st \~ after Working hours due to the fact thAt it may help to prevent y , burglaries from raking place in this office pa.Y. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. j If you have any questions please feel free to contact us at your earliest convenience, Sincerely, THE ARM A Y Andrew Barmakien President AB/jbl ?' ._ .�"•. _ r���i aJ11CF c .C;:A'.1�,'VGA °s_ctic•,;:, i`-�;� . . r,`• tin irZac a h�`r+> mgrg9iamPnt • AC+:htiP�TSJt@ _ J-4 i L. Etl!l1"KV : : SWNT AW COMHTIr?iliNl. 131 PVWT 8&12 .WESTERN e estaolisMent or an automoolle leasing office in an exts ng a ng, with a Tease space of 3,750 squait feet on 1.66 acres ef.land to the•8aneral Industrial District`�(Subarea 4) located at 9375 •, kr%:hibald - APH 210.471-47, ' Debra lei or, Assistant;-Vanner, reviewed the staff report;, Staff suggested ran additional condition k'­�laced on the Resolution prohibiting the overnight parkin.- lease vehi.dles or associated trainers, Chairman Stout opened the"public hearing. TR+e applicant; was not present and there were no public comments, therefore the public hearins was closed; Chairman Stout was concerned that the applicant aright get the impression that approval of this Conditional Use Pemit was`iiso an approval of the s( urity guard control compan!. He suggested that an additional condi ti-on,be added to the Resolution stat,ng that this approval was'for the office-ackofnistrative uses only and that additional use expansion 'would require .separate consideration by the Planning Commission. Re stated he did not have a problem with staff's recommendation to prohibit overnight parking; however, would liked to have nau the applicant present to discuss this issue. He asked if the applicant had been notified of the hearing. Ms. Meier replied that the applicant had been notified and that 'Gd spoken with thm prior to this hearing. E Commissioner Chitiea asked if there were any- parking complaints received recently. j Ms. Meier advised that staff had contacted other tenants within this project and had been informed that since the property owner had spoken with the applicant, there had been no further perking problems. Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by McNiel, to issue a Negative Declaratio:e and. adopt the-,Resolution approving Environmental Assessment and Conditional Use Permit 86-12, with art added condition stated that approval of Conditional Use Permit 86-12 is for the office-administrative use only and that any expansion of the use to include the security partrol company, and a condition prohibiting overnight- parking of lease vehicles and/or trailers. - Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONER$ CHITIEA, MCNIEL, REMPEL, STOUT j NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER. carried Planning Commission Minutes -9- July 23, 1985 i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAXONGA �L Q it STAFF REFORT r.^ `7 2 (. J9 > rvA DATE: July 23, 1986 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning'. Cgmmission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Debra.Meier, Assistant- Planner w� SUBJECT:. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 86-12 WEal' AA _3El E3'' COMPANY e estao I i shment o an . au omo e eas ng o rWe--and general administrative offices, in an existing building, with a lease space of 3,750 square fleet.on 1.66 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 4) iocaaed at 9375 Archibald Avenue - APN 210-071-47. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A A. Action Reque_sstte�d: Approval of a Conditional Use Permit and issuance ora-F ative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: Nor" - SCE Su5station; ISP--Subarea 4 South - Industrial Park; ISP Subarea 4 East - Industrial; ISP Subarea 4 Wiest - Vineyard; ISP Subarea 16 ' C. General Plan Designations: roj&T7SjT.e - Ueneral Lndustrial North - General Industrial South - General Industrial East General Industrial West - Industrial Park D. Site Characteristics: The site is an existing Industrial Business Park with a campus-like setting containing approximately 23,000 square feet of building space. The site is fully improved and landscaped and 96 standard size parking spaces are available on site. E. Applicable Regulations: The proposed use is classified as Admi-nFstrative and Office which is a conditionalTy permitted use in Subarea 4. 5 �} PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 86-IZ - West; Serx,Tees Company July 23, 1986 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: } A. General: The._ applicant is currently operating from the P premises withob� the required Conditional .Use Permit. The business at this location consists of,adinistrative duties of Western Services Company including; locating and r`)taining financing for au tc=biles per client requests contr' t ing for repairs of mobile homes, and the administration of a security guard and patrol service. They have about seven employees at , the Office at any onr time and operate from 9.00 a,m. until 8:00 p.m. The vehicles for fease are stored at Vineyard,ltest. stc age Yard located at 8646 Vineyard Avenue. The applicant ,was -made aloare of the requirement for the ! Cond',c,naI Use Permit in January of tais year^., It became an iss'�o irt�olving code enforcement when other on»sgte businesses and theO customers �►vere complm;:,ing of an ontsite parking problem. The probli:� was the result of lease: vehicles being stored on-site. This want that i-istern Services was utilizing mo?e than the percentage of parking""paces allowed to them. They are allotted by percentage (1l2so sq. f%J the use of 15 on-site spaces. Those spaces are for use by employees, clients and any accessory vehicles brought to the ste for leasing ` purposes, The parking problem was brought to their attention and they have apparently,,, --7eed out a solution that has alleviated the problem. A rkommended condition of-approval of this Conditional Use Fermit is that at no time shall mo:e than tf .allotted 15 on-site parking spices be utilixq¢ by the users of"t«is business. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Tito proposed use is 1-i accordance with the Ue—neral Plan, a ab3ectives of the Development Code, and the Purposes of the Industrial Specific Plan Subarea in which the site"' is located as evidenced by the Conditional Use Pemit prevision for administrative and office uses in thin Subarea. The proposed use, together with the recommended Cond::ions of approval,, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in tote area. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan. Iv. CORRESPONDENCE: T,zis item has been advertised as a public hearing 1n e a y eport newspaper, tine prouerty posted and notices sent to all Property owners within 300 feet of the project. PLANNING COMMXSS'10V 'TAFP REPORT CUP 86-12 `- W ter,_ ,ervices Company July 23, 2986 Page 3 . " V. ' RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends, that the `Planning Comiissidn - ,, ssue a ega ve oeelaration and approve Conditional Use Permit e6- 12 through a0ption of the attached Resolution and Conditions of Approval. Respectfully submitted,, `r. Brad Buller City Planner Attachments: Applicant's Letter v Exhibit "A" - Location,Map ' Exhibit "6" - Site Plan', a Resolution of Approval with Conditions a y i t t 'R ti - i .... T I ♦ r 1 st\ Pa �crj.2 r. s! s Q Q' f sSIAC 6.40AC 2.99AC, i .._ Pat 3#St Arw A/w �,?Qll �' 'g 9Tjy7 4.25.iC„y„n :Y Fkrr.2 3.33AC g 228AC: �sr R. .n Fa , 2 { a` 4 63 Ajj.S5a Vri wt.. s.vo. a 5522 A C Al/t a Ii9 AC X 9saa `2eqq CC T n h MAP 004-36,20 { 3.38AC. .� Q, PAR.It v 2.204C."� 29 3T PGP.I 9d'2�seer_ ? ki.93AC 2 f Ac f2.2040 a►aQ 'd s•. JdAra f i o SAN BERN►'ARDINO Glad" Ieoro' `ORTH CITY OF PLANNING DR%M FXHIEI"i', SCALE.- •--- I �• ram- ,� � II ' � � iill ; ��l �- ��'� —'- I (I I•I_� I _`��t I ( I � I I ( I I I^.� I I I F,!• n, I � � � ` i�� ( i ! I I t—� ����' �� _ �' `� '� Ott) �, •r ^4 � .�.�_ �) Alp 14 44 tom!'T Lit CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO\'GA TI'E .w TITLE: PLAMING DIVISKW EXHIBIT-.�t�' SC,,kl L ,.1 -w 41 RESOLUTION NO. 86-109 h, A RESOLUTION, OF THE-RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING. COWISSIOIi APPROVING COWDITIONAQ USE PERHIT NO. 86-12 FOR WESTERN SERVICES COMPANY LOC/ITED AT 9375 ARCHIBALD AVENUE IN THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC 5,s'STRICT WHEREAS, on the 25th day of ,dune, 1906,"a compliee application .was filed by Western Services Company for review af,the.above-de sri6, and ,3 project; l WHEREAS, cn the 23rd day of July, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing o P g t o consider the move-described project. now, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission reSalved as fol lows: _ SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use Is in aecbrd iith the 8eneral Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site. is C L-�ated• 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions. applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or webfare, or materially injurious to properties or 'improvements "in the m vicinity. g 3. Thal. the proposed"`'ase complies ,with each of the appiica.ble Provisions of the Development Code, SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environmen t 07Wat a Negative Declaration is issued on July 23, .1986, SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 86-12 is. approved subject to the folTowing conditions: 1. Parking of employees, clients or accessory vehicles brought on site for any reason, shall not use more' than a total of 15 parking spaces at any one time, Resolution No. �t"� .. Page: 2 ` 2. T;a"?overnight �garki ng or storage of 1 ease vehicles and/or tra3Yerl assadMted with use shall be prohibited. 3: This approvat is of Office-Admi"nistrative uses,only. Additional r. use :6pansion to include a security guard pa"trol company ,will require separate consideration by the Con�nissi`on. APPROVED AW ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF JULY, 1986.. PLANN G COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUGA�ION6A ' t:. :. BY• ' �.���� enn s ou , hair-man ATTEST: r EVFU er, ep ecre ary I, Brad Buller, Deputy.Secrelary of the Planning Commission of the City of .i Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly, introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning"Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,,at a regular meliting of 'the Planning Commission held on the 23rd ,day of'July, 1986, by the foil"lowing vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, REMPEL, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER AWL P,- Al — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA c�CAMoyG. STAFF REPORT o F � Z U DATE: November 12, 086 1977 ` TO: :- Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller-, City Planner BY: Debra,Meier, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TIME EK.TENSIQN ;FOR AND :MODIFICATION TO C_QNDITIONAL USE - to rem , eT J+­ CANNON propusa the sore. .ronti aca ur aT landscaping in the parking;area, reconstructtlon of drive approaches, a minor building addition;. a ctynceptual' building pad for' a proposed drive-thru fast,400d restaurant in an existing Neighborhood Commercial shopping center on approximately 7.8 acres in a' Neighborhood Commercial (kC)� District located at-:the, northeast'corner.of Carnelian and Base Line - APR 202-381-24,26,28,33,36.. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: IA. Action a ues e : proval of a time extension and moth -Cat on .to a conditional'Use Permit. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North Single_F y esi ential; Medium'Residential (8-14 du/ac) South - The exchange building; Office/Professional District East - Alta Loma High School; Low Density Residential t2=4 da/ac) West - Single Family Residential•, Low Density Residential - (204 du/ac) C. "General Plan Designations: Project site - e g_ oSrFoo-d Commerical North - Medium Density Residential (4-14 du/ac) South Office East Low Density Residential (2-4 au,fac) We,it — School D. Site Characteristics: The property is .a developed /1,000 square foot neighborhood commercial shopping center, ARL ITEM K P, Chairman and Members Of the Planning Commission November 12, 1986:�r ' CUP 84-34 Page ? ,i ` II ANALYSIS: dal: The site was constructed about 12 years ago un er aunty- of San Bernardino. Development Standards. Conditional Use Permit 84-54 tiyA-•approved by the Planning Commission on Novembeo i4, 1,084,, for a two year ,period,. That approval fnclpded adding"a• conceptuAl b`uiiding pad, updating archi'tectura5 treatment and : style of the existing bW:Tdih#, additional landscaping, pedestrian;, convenience• areas and upgraded drive ap roach ontry Changes, ai 1 .of which are consistent with"`�ihe goals of Y. the General Pl,a t and Dav-De t ent*.de " TNe-tteveioper is requesting(for}'4a time extensfon as stated in the attached o�W letter. The_ madii€ft4t on i`s a staff-initiated ;request where a,conditi:on of approval ins being added to assure (list the maintenance of the site rua and bu31d"ing is according'. agreed to the ddedacortdit approved which reads asf Hops `.- has � The site shall �� developed -,and maintained in 'l accordance with 6-' app}raved plans (which includes'. architectural treant, exterior Materials and color, landscaping and grading) on €ile with the Planning Division, the conditions contained therein, in Development Code regu;ations. Request to modify any of the ab7ve shall be approved by the Planning Ft5 Commission prior to commencing work or issuance of Building Permits. 1I1. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Staff has analyzed the proposed time extension an , mo ica ion with the development criteria outlined' in the 1' City's Development Code and General Plan and find that the .project meets all Development Code requirements, IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing y in the Daily epopt newspaper, property posted ano notices sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project. V. RECOMMENDATION: ('Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve a one yeb� time extension and modification to Conditional Use Permit d4-34 through the adoption of the attached Resolution. 77 Chairman and Et embers O?� tii Planning Comsstfission November 12, 1986 �5 >. CUP 84-34 :. Page 3 , a r y`. Res fully su ted, bra Bull r City Planner BB�DtiovC Attachments: Letter from Applicant Exhibit'"A" - Location eta "� t << Exhibit "Bu - ktaii 5��e� 7�n Exhibit " - Building"Ievations r I ;K-3 C014STRUCT07 September 30, 198:5 INC o ?No.3615% Ms. Nancy Fong, Associate Planner c/o Debra Meyer P.O. Box $07 Rancho Cuca2Q, i as C,-Alifornia 91730 Dear Ms. Fong- �d On behalf of the n or owners of Alta Loma Country 'pillage, z am requesting the?�maximum possible extention for the present Conditio7,hax Use Permit alobw This request is aisayon behalf of Garth Sheriff, of Sheriff & Assoctatjer,', nur architectural fire on this pro- ject. Should you have any questions, or need additional infor- mation,,please feel free to call me. Sincerely, CA 014 CO TRDCTORS I INC. icha a chle Executive ice President RS:ks - cc: Donald Janes Ask 4204 S0114 SERKWDA&*ULGMRO•CULVER CITY,(A 90230 a(213)204-SSOO LOS ANGELES 6 ORAW74-(C?UNTY .,_ �.. It t h Soho l LM eati Os Gin • V r = ' r J i NORTH CITY n11, IMM. Map RANCHO CUC -J IC,\t t.L HTLE: CUP �N-341 PLANNING DIVISION Etf31I31T k--5 i �� �n^':w'•.';y .. O �.^.�"ti. �i.__._� tit] '..1��,7 C 1.T Alw 11T1 jay ;• � }.�. ��> d•''e•�•►A( �w4�ti TA,~"�M1t,� �.LK.,.+. Y•W M�. —i} E�. � ..>t .;.z�..-.?l d • -• �1 J p-- t•G. L1 Ac J at r d 0 -C l: - J ¢ tt 41 Ott:: C a..-. EM - .+..`m'n•'►`_ t ur 40, IT .q% .l..w.1M.'. .t q.•Ti w m I.liDI 0 lilt • tM '� ,� rr N..w•� a n I ; , ailtla t__1t rt r14 a ,.�.. . - -- rill f Q `tiulirn �cte �=e - V � yy� ••ter' { till BASELINE $,?REEF l I J f. NORTH CITY OF FEN[: CUP EY'EN RANCHO Cal'C A"NIO\'{'1A TITI.I'_ £�fRffed �/� f?frin PLANNING DIVISION t'XilttilT= k- G _� _Q,411iH ELEYKTiQN ram.,•.a. { T 5 .ens�eYn�toN •,•� t t CITY t>I= x�r:�:t _ CUP f _ a wa.rwrw+..� WEST ELEVATION ++„ •«•-••.:_.., �" " SOUTH. ELEVATION • EAST ELEVATION 77, I. I ,=TP.CANOPY$ECT+ery S}jQPS,p� AN OPT S gT uvv OdRJ(i 3TOdiE CANOPY SE tMu STATER 81165 CITY OF rrtaa �uP ��-3y I'.VXCI X (..LC..'v�m< CPO a.�. 111.1: 7d� A Ir1E'raffor,= 01V151(N t: f ftl�i"T' 4 SG Lit _ k--g V REI.&UTION NO. A RESOLUT10K OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, AF"+i ROVING THE TIME"EXTENSION FOR AND MODIFICA't t-W l TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84-34 WHEREAS, a request has ueen f1f(ed for a time extension for the above-described project, pursuant to Section 17,4R.100 :4EREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above-'e'scribed Conditional Use Permit 94-34 on the 14th day of November, 1984 r. ,WHEREAS, on the,12 day of November, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held'"a public ;tearing t4 consider the above-described modification. SECTION 1; The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Comni4ssid4 nas made the following findings: A. That prevailing economic ,conditions have caused X distressed market (,,,imate for development of the project. B. That current pconomic., marketing, and inventory conditions make; it unreasonabi{ to develop the V project at this'-time. C. That strict enforcement of..the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not,he consistent with the intent of the Development Code. D. That the granting of said time extension will not he detrimental to the public health, safety, or we-.,.- or materially injurious to properties tar improvements in the vicinity. E. That the proposed use is in accord with the General' V Plan, the obSectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is lccated. F. That ttte proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. G. That the proposed use coitpiies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. k-q r� RESOLUTION N0. CUP 84-34 Page c SECTION 2 This project is exempt from environmental evaluations a�'sed—on California Environmental Quality Act CEQA, Article 19, ;Section 15301, the minor alteration of maintenance of r existing public or private structures. SECTION-3: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Ccmission hereby.grants a time extent on or: Project Ap lsliicant Expiration CUP 84-34 Cannon Constructors, Inc, November 12,.1985 SECTION 4: That`'the modification to Conditional .Use Permit 84-34 is approved subject o the fdllcwing ceriditions: 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans (which includes architectural treatment, exterior materials and �. color, landscaping and grading) on file,-with the Planning Division, the conditions contained therein, and Development Code Regulations. 2. The approval of the modification to this Conditional Use Permit shall not waive compliance with any Special or Standard Conditions of Reso'ution 84-127. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF W''°Q 0 CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis Sty, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning twanission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of November, 1986 by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: CfISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS': —iv CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG'! CAn10 STAFF REPORT k P 4 r DATE: November 12, 19B5 f9�77 TO: Chairman and Members of the ,planning Commission FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Joe Stofa Jr.', Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 10185 WILLIAM L N AN ' A SU41iVisiono acres of an into2 parcels in the ctorix-Planned Communi+y 'located 'in the southwest corner ' of Highland Avenue and Milliken' ienue (APN 202-211-13) I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Re uested; Approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map as ssnown on x Tt "B" B. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 9.0 Acres, Parcel 2 - 24.7 Acres C. Existing Zoning: Parcel I - Village Commercial Parcel 2 - Residential D. Surrounding Land Use: North - acan-V t i South Under construction Residential East Vacant West - Under construction Residential E. S rrounding General Plan and Development Cade Designations: worth ReR 1dentla South Residential East Residential West - Residential I ITEM L I — .;,� , PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PM 10185 - WILLIAM 'LYON. CO. November 12, 1986 Page 2 F. Site:Characteristics: The site is vacant and slopes approximately 4% toc.*he south. II'. ANALYSIS: The purpose of this arcel Map is to create two separate parcels, each with a different land use within the Victoria Planned Community. Parcel is designated as Village Commercial with Parcel 2 being residential use. The applicant has noesubmitted any..development plans ai this time. The public streets adjacent to the site will be improved to City Standards upon development on a parcel by parcel basis. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The applicant completed Part I of the Initial y.--3tad conducted a field L investigation and completed Part. Il of 1 t6d Initial Study. No adverse impacts upon the 4�wironment are anticipated as�'a result of this project. iterefore,, issuance of,Negative £ Declaration is appropriate. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the ,ite has also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that ,:he Planning Commission consider { all p t and elements of the Tentative Parcel Map. If aftur such consideration, the Coirmizsion can recommend approval, ,then the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance, of a Negative Dec"raration would be appropriate. Relpectfully submitted, ,1 Barrye R. Hanson I Senior Civil Engineer BRH:JS:dlvr Attachments:, Vicinity lap (Exhibit "A") J Tentative'Map (Exhibit "B") Resolution and Recommended Conditions of Approval L -z 1 � y y f7 .1 Ali 1 > AK- 1 vk C LM ry .' am rt., c �1ilr 1y�ii- wo " p'i{"gti"�vTl+p►~�- tore 1 i=. 1�"�r►�'.' .r,I'AtrpyIJrriWri►� .! to+ OKI , i It /�) �� �4' � -`� •', �� lam. �n�� J'�c-�., r��c■�--..�1'"• Vie,•J:.. r ,�,F, ,'T�i:..� +�a.`'. ,. . '�. r " TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 10185 III•The City of.Rancho Cucamonga,County o4 San Baenardlno,CaRtomta, THE WILLIAM RYON rCOMPANY INC. sr - eaAo AFCNM:LL wtiE�fi,Panry,C(K.'A!Y.aGl CAWWNIA Emo 1 ..�4-01REii � �� O.T aC PCL �• T.,^.E SV.ssesnrw0 F— •alul. "1,f Ae..n AugH. ft M, �n 'V PARCEL t N + es�A�c A i .a......AsN ON WAY ut aewEsno.wit oaa.. enavn El 41 WEIWIOAVBNUE. yUJ EN AVEAIE Nam.(.L a' rwd ns w PARCEL 2 Z469 •.c.u.•wa _ _ wo �=23£�as sae. r ss .:nes n. t E Ea a .w.o caa... • [.L[K,Cf brL++F.V C19 ♦.FJ�uh �y�-"���� VICU Y MAP TENTATIVE PARCEL •,�. � «� MAP NO , ;cowsuarrn:-•caouay 1018 5 Moan ., Ex m i at _ I„ RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF WE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CIT OF RANCHO CUC#1MONGA, CALIFORNIA, -CONDITI4NdALLY APPROVING TEMTATIVE PARI�EL,MAP NUMBER 10185 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Mad Number 10185, submitted by William Lyon Company, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 2 parcels, ,he real property S#uated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California; identified as APN(s) 202-211-13, located southwest corner of Highland Avenue and Milliken Avenue; and WHEREAS, on November 12, 1986, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above-described map. ` NOW, THEREFOQEy,THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1 That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. ` 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is.- consistent with the General Plan. U 3. That the site `is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements wili not k cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2 That Tentative Parcel Map No. 10185 is hereby approved subject to the attached Standard Conditions and the following Special Conditions: SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. Final alignw.nt for the future foothill Freeway shall be approved by CalTr,ans prior to recordation of the map. 2. Line "A" of the Master Plan of Drainage for Tract 13022, Victoria Groves, shall be constructed prior to occupancy of any buildings for.Parcel l or Parcel 2. 3. An • in-lieu fee as contribution to the future unde`rgrounding of the existingoverhead utilities (telecommunication and electrical) on the opposite side of Highland Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits for Parcel 1. The fee shall be one-half the adopted unit amount times the length from the center of Fairmont lay to the center of Milliken Avenue (858 feet). L-_55 RESOLUliON NO. PM 10185 WILLIAM LYON CO November 12 1986 Page 2 a. Mil'liken/Avenue'shall be constructed as follows: A. Portion from Kenyan Way to Highiand Avenue with the dsrelopment of Parcel 1 (1) -Full improvements for the west roadbed; Full median with no openings; 3 A minimum 181 wide pavement for the east roadbed; and (4) Drainage control devices such as paved ditches, A.C. berms or curbs shall be installed as approved by the City Engineer. B. Portion from 'Victoria Park Lane'to Highland Avenue with the development o` Parcel 2: (1) Full improvements for the west roadbeu; (2) Full median with 1-noening at Kenyan Way; (3) A minimum 18' wide pavement for the east roadbeds and (4) Drainage control devices such as paved ditches, Aft A.C, berms or curbs shall be installed as approved by the City Engineer. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1986. PLANNING 17OM.MISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ;ATTEST: J' Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adapted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission 'held 'L on he 12th day of November, 1986, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS:_ NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 1 L_ , y to�" fc w ml a �..M Ll to- ,b yts sw gga� >_ �_ $she t � $ Y1�Ftft NW— six~i r w` Y eu ��''i� � i�' •• o= a" ��', ,��» 'ate _ a Y m C S■ Y ' » r Y fj 9� a $ CC VvY Cp M Iw ILVV 04RHOa AOL SZOF Y N q i L-7 M uia �eS icyy°' �n }W y Y E C A ur Pa 4Cy w v. g 4g I f N $Iz a€ e$r` r "yL E dI��nn Lis z Es w L— Y AR yr. S�j. « {y er. �' ak tl4V'�'S�.. �� gYar.�� ��u• �° ;_5'L - OE tlW � +L M; � � V V g• it w rp r4 uc gS _y sE YC ^C 9WG '$9 N C •.• yy. COp C.O' L.d °Tg E°Y$.NS M �O 11Nd3�+� Y 72 =" >+ E21 i5 Y ■' yT w L`�:ii .,•c" ' ci C III W► CITY OF RANCHO CUCA VIONGA F. �STAFY REPORT a° m a �,L v DATE: November 12, ,1986 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission u,. FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer BY: `�_40e Stofa(""Jr., 4sociate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 10237 - BARTON - A subdivision of 39,9acres of landinto 14 parcels in the ene'ral Industrial District Subarea 8, located between' Arrow Route and '+ Jersey Boulevard, between Utica Avenue and Vincent Avenue - APN. 209-142-15, 14, 34 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: j•1 A. Action Requested: Approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map as shown on Exhibit "BIT B. Parcel Size: Parcel 1) 27,443 Sq. Ft. Parcel 8) 28,750 Sq. Ft. Parcel 9) 14,810 Sq. Ft. Parcel 9} 2.28 Acres e Parcel 3) 20,038 Sq. Ft. Parcel 10) 4.38 Acres Parcel 4) 25,700 Sq. Ft. Parcel 11) 6.88 Acres Parcel 5) 20,038 Sq. Ft. Parcel 12) 6.86 Acres Parcel 6) 20,038 Sq. Ft. Pa,=cel 5.3 10.84 Acres Parcel 7) 15,246 Sq. Ft. Parcel 141 4.74 Acres C. Existing Zoning: General I;ydustrial District (Subarea 8) 0. Surrounding Land Use: North - Partial vacant and existing multi-tenant buildings South - Partial vacant and existing industrial buildings East - Partial vacant and existing industrial buildings West - Partial vacant and existing industrial buildings E. Surrounding General Plan and Development Code Designations-. North - Industrial Park South - General Industrial, Industrial Park East - General Industrial, Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial West - Industrial Park ITEM M PLMNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PM 10237 BARTON November'12, 1986 ► . Page 2 F. Site Characteristics. The site is vacant-'3nd vegetation consists of decayed vineyards. The land slopes from north to south at apnroximately 4%. i II. ANALYSIS: The purpose of this parcel map is to crjate separate parcels for the Industrial Master Plan approved by the Planning Commission as Development Review 86-26 on October 8, 1986. The relationship of the parcel lines to the 'approved project site plan is shown on F, Exhibit "C". M The public streets adjacent to the site will be improved to City standards upon development on a parcel by parcel basis with the exception of Red Oak Steet. Red Oak Street shall be constructed for its entire length from Arrow Route to Jersey Boulevard upon' t construction of Phase II of the Industrial Master Plan. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The applicant comp�tfed Part I of the Initial Study. Staff Conducted a field investigation and completed Part II of the Initial Study. No adverse impacts upon the environment are anticinated as a result of this project. Therefore, issuance of Negative D60ar'ation is appropriate. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily Report'-iiewspaper. Posting at the site has also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATION• It is recommended that the Planning_Commission consider all nput anti' elements of the Tentative Parcel Map. If after such consideration, the Commission can recommend approval, then the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would k be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, Barrye R. Hanson Senior Civil engineer BRH:JS:me Attachm°nts: Vicinity Map (Exhibit "A") Tentative Map (Exhibit "B") Detailed Fite Plan (Exhibit "C") Resolution and Recr vended Conditions of Approval y ca BASELINE FOOTJILI. BLVD. ARROW ROUTE SITE JERSEY BLVD . SIN BERBARDINO FMY.' CITY OF :-PARCEL MAP IQ2�? RANCHO CUCAMONGA Trrm-.VIc1ml:ry AR ENGRqMMG DI GN rr A „ NI..3 TE`NTATVE_ PARCEL MAP NO . 10237 i % itiLT� OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN f�ERf�ARDINO COUNTYC�CALIFORNIA - ` - -v� ' urnNttt m sNN nur N. �._, ,.ntnnF Estee Etas t tt' 4. ii O SCALE- 11•100' I I it PARCEL I �i 7 g t� a tIR ►- —'tt saNa(uN hsuaw j (! p. 4iF t ------ ------- h! .tell. h-- it to I 10 €'R fi14t lF Lu tcu 3 -t.N atilt 041 1 PARCEL PARCEL 2 t PARCEL HAP NO.4255 - EX;M DIT,.het t Nf TENTATIVE PA R CI� i:' NEAP NO . 10`237_ CITY OF RARC1�� CUCAPONGA SAN _OERNAROINO C'0`UNTT, CAILFORNIA � - 17•11M!fee d Nt 1•'ttIe1A1��.� a r g -- —�11 [SOtf PPP � ' Illeeel/real -- li7frl eilM911 fir ME U (� r I E^ M #.o It �1 T W [ c� � msmuuE snszumt u d -- siii oet i 14 • s`uele �� a e11116 n i t 3 mmll fell 12 � 1 E, a� SCALE- 1--loo' 6 _5. 4�ror . 1 � GENERAL POAMAtEfl ''+ ID ! -3E:J L-L .Is PLAN It �� if o ► � paw— QeWML NOUB TaAL i��' EEMTH,SL - i WsM PLAN SRE umeAnm MAr. ° "�` RANCHO CUCAMIQNGA BUSINESS PARK 11 BAFtT�w Dek/&OPMe f CoWMy e CITY j RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION ' )c PLANNING COMMISSION OF Tr1E CITY OF RANCHO WCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING•. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 10237 l WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel ;dap Number 10237, submitted by" james E. Barton, applicant, far the purpose of subdividing into 14 parcels; tha, real property situated in the CAty of- Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Eeraardino, State of California, id'entitFied as APN(s) 209-142-;5 14, 34, locateoIETWEEN UTICA fiVENUE AND VINCEN T AVENUE, BETWEEN ARROW ROUTE AND JERSEY BOULEVARD;. and WHBIEAS, on November 12, 1986, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing'for the above-described map, NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHD CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLL,QidS: SECTION L: Thai; the following findings h'rrme been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the Get;eral Plap.. � Z. That the improvement of the mp proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Pl.in. � AkL 3. That the site i�- physir-'ly suitable for the proposed_ development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public tan'fth problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. 1 SECTION 2: That Tentati-ve Parcel Map No. 10237 is hereby approved { subject to t e attached Standard Conditions and the following Special Conditions: SPECIAL COND1rIONS: r 1. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Arrow Route shall be undergrounded as follows, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy to any buildings, whichever occurs first:' a. , Parcel 13 - from the first,pole nn the west side of Utica Avenue to the first pole on the east side of Red Oak Street; b, Parcel 14 - from the fiat pole on the west_aide of Red Oak I Street to the first pole east of the project.boundary. RESOLUTION NO: PM 10237 - Barton ` November 12 1986 Page 2 g.' Reimbursement of one-half the adopted cost of undergrounding from future development as it occurs on the opposite side of the street is feasible from the presently undeveloped properties., 2. A drainage study'sha1'l be provided by the developer's Engineer and d! approfted by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of any. permits (foundation, grading, building, etc.) for any project. The study it shall specifically address: `€ a. The \impacts of drainage to the intersection of Red Oak Street E '} and,,Jersey Boulevard inclWing potential flows crossing Jersey Boulevard; An analysis of flows in Jersey Boulevard including street capacity and the need for possible storm drains; and C. A plan indentifying when needed drainage"facilities are required j in terms ofproject phase constrA)ction. 3. Red Oak Street shall be".constructed for its entire length from Arrow Route to Jersey Boulevard upon construction cf Phase ii of the �. Industrial taster Plan, .(DR 86-261 4. Sidewalk is required on or+e side of Red Oak Street . Utica Avenue; and Vincent Avenue between Arrow Route and Jersey Boulevard, however, meandering sidewalk throughout the project for all streets is acceptable. 5. The driveways along Red Oak Street shall be constructed as follows: a. A 30-foot wide drive approach at the property 'line. b. A 15-foot throat depth from the public'street curb to the first parking stall. 6. The develop;x shall pay all reimbursement fees per City Council Resolution No. 85-328 executed by Daon Corporation for construction of improvements on Arrow Route,prior'to issuance of building^ permits for Parcels 13 or 14. ,rt 4y� 8 r % - RESOLUTION. NO PM'10237 - BARTON �s. NoveFber 12, 1986 .� PagF_ APPROVED-AND ADOPTED THIS 12th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAPIONGA BY: '.. Dennis C Stout, hairmhn ATTEST: fi Brad 8u1 er; Deputy Secretary 11 I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho ,*;ucamonga, do hereby certify that theforegoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,. passed,, and adopted bys+he Planning Commission ,of the City of Rancho-CucamonBa,Jat a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of November, 1986 "by the following vote-to-wit: �i r AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: r rr, J. agv .5:^ �9v �b+� 4C• NbC 4.�L Oi�A CW� "2 PV dC g Sa V 9 LLB Co u3y',. c�,.a. Er E� .9E �.R a 2�?a YLi A.G SO L} E. •1 � 1'' q✓ ,� i�C 4Q aW �.� p3NLiy �y� .. 1 4 k E ff � tCeyy CCV o .7 � a � S • '..,y O` V qr� NM • CY's Eve at or uN 6�0 C�aLw `'..�L iu ti o V+6 COM E N ' Vtt <CC ay p NC a m to L Oq �Q p� 1 e� 4mM R" d'L V.ma 4 C"m = LL Y O yy^,, pOpL�. l L L aop4iM b a' 11f gip: R i N N e v'L° y. 4u Yc p�Q�$. o�^' N C 3 ^A 6 y ^N g 3 u V S 60z-V 4 W �y4ppd Y Va 4 N C O uY m c� Nr . n ` c4 cco o G Cp Ym V Cv �A ON 6y O� WL lC C yU^ P �L pPJ ten. 6 OC -� �.y 3� q 'CC^. S y G A3L 63 m6 C D 6'au el I ! f M- 1`1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -18TAFF REPORT F 2 ! _ v y DATE: November 12, 1986` 1977 TO: Clairman and Members of the Planning Commission - FROM!` Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Debra Metier, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: MODIFICAttN TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 80-02 - BROWN - The eva`le opmen i� Z ?t square oo retail shopping center "'on 2.6 acres of land in the General Commercial District located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and 31 Lion Street - APN 20$-532-48. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESGRIPTIM: A. Action Requested: Approval of a Modification to the on ions se-IFe—mit. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning ;J flb��=�x3�;ng s n—`�`g I e Ta7m 7Y residenti al; Low-Densi ty Residential (2-4 du/ac) r� . South - Existing multi-family project; Medium-High Density �k Residential (14-24 du/ac) East vacant land with existina small office building; General Commercial West Existing shopping center - Rancho Town Center; General Commercial C., General Plan Designations: Project to Generalcommercial _ North Low-Density Residential (2-4 du/ac). South - Medium-Nigh Density Residential (14-24 du/ac) East General Commercial West - General Commercial D. Site Characteristics:: The site consists of an existing s opp ng center - the Music Plus Plaza, with 28,515 square feet of,retail uses. The site is fully improved' and landscaped. II. ANALYSIS: A. 'General- The shopping center was approved and developed about TTSU—and remains a well-maintained and attractive center. Recently approved was a 1,450 square foot addition to the Music Plus store which is a long-term major tenant at this center. ITEM N PLANNING CCOOhN IS5I'ON, S*W:REPORT F T Modificat,on to'CUP 80-02 Brown Novemher 12, 1986 K Page'2 AOh The Conditional Use Permit will be modified by the inclusion of ' an additional :Con'ditt'on of Approval. The modification' is a staff-initiated request with which the applIcant.agrees. The y condition will read as follows: w The site shell be maintained in accordance with the z approved puns.. _iwhich includes architectural l treatment, exterior materialt and colur", and i andscnpi ng 3 on f i!e with the Pi anni,ng Division., the Condiations contained thereih, ''and DE.velopreent Cade regulations. Request to modify any of the above e_ shall be approved' by the Planning Ctsnmission prioe ;E a to cotiinencing work,or 1ssu'3,ce of bui`iding,aermits. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The proposed MiAificatidh to the Conditional se erm 3s consistent witch the,-general Plan and Deve lopment;` Code. The recommended ;Condition of ApptFovai will dot 6e detrimental to publics health, safety, or, welfare, or materially injurious to propert4 es or improvements in this;area. IV. CORRESPONDENCE:, This item bas been advertised',;as a Public Oe eing� in a Daily eport newspaper, properties posted, and naticd!s sent to —a—property-517—property owners within 300 feet of the project,. ' V. RECOt+B+1ENDATION- Stuff recomw ends that the Planning Comm s!,ion, approve the Modification to- Conditional Use Permit; 80,0Z through: adoption of attachad Resolution and Condition of '►pprgv&l._ Res tfully su ted, )Brad Bul er - City Planner BB:DM:ns Atiachments: Letter from Property Owner Exhibit "tt" - Site Plan ` Exhibit "B" - Typical Butilding Elevations Resolution of Approval with Conditions; N-7- ta'.MC Mettles lmearmM cmpgaaen October 13, 1986 k City of R--tcho Cucamonga Department of =Tanning Attn: $red Buller,,City'Manner 9320 Baseline s._,d ,. P.O. Box 807 ry _ Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91730 Subject: Modification of C.U.P $0-2, Music Plus Shopging Center qq Foothill Blvd., Rancho-Cucamonga I -;a Dear Brad: In regards to your reques(5for additions to our C.U.P. concerning _ modifiaatisns to architectural treatments, paint colors or materials • " we are in agreement with, the addition of this condition to this C.U.P. and the review of any changes in colors or materials. Plea91 accept our application through Pitassi-Dalmaui�&chitects. ,`' If you should have any questions please call me ati: (213) i-.-, 9232. ' Sincerely, H.J. B.+._stn HJB/Jla ATMOk A. P; 24024 Vista Montana,Torrance.Califomia 90505 (213)375-9232 k N 3 j r - �' ,,,, ,��L,,,ten..=^,--�'.f j~`I-�= -----(.-T+. _;._•' �� , . ` ` A60.K�C ••••• •. ••••^- '.ant C�f,uvftaiYruYe.ur`roQuwirr.ru .0 ls4M ..—., w 16 � ,6. a '•Rwr'Wi � '�w'er•u R"A'C 'A' of b IA + e r :7�� tea_ S�9_•C��. _ at 6 J�- '•1�4q'a (���• �� ^` �Pl,�+lt9.a Wl2�rap '1 �Mt•�c IJwMGi c�Rk �'. �,�,� t fM. � T J .e ;,����T' � ::$► a Se1.�T er.,a.r1r -'r�''K' ����. "��'`-� i> '�" «'.;y 4.w+w-�LJ esR�.rular► v 4°�i...ow.wsit� (' 7�' R.7" �_. a L � _ ( .-r_ 1�-`'g4!k_ � ael Tl .ir' co' id_1 �q .�n: •s+ la v�i ,`C ,: ko��.� ,y �3� "7"4 `�,� ` - '. ,I ���'•--= - r7iiw�-��� .e_4'f ao� �. Y .Q� V ° 'CANT FTNNss �um Mur 1`r •fs9A�Of*44 HYP._7. •'S,,�r29. 11 C q •. �� � � �7R�•ms l� ffi �04.�,cd "'n"sq.�.. ; i f �� v AKMA *ifs j — 41 is UGC - O RTH CITE' OF ITEM: RAINCHO t, .;C NIONGA TITLE- I ATZ,4AI E x_ - r -40 I al r NO)RTE } CITY LOT 10 �v , ITI�I P! -NNING DI'\'IS,C:,, Exi itrtT. Sc: LE ,: -�llllllfrliill�lll U II�III�i'�'lll(i�(IR'��� '`����,II ./ � .�� , - .-=-.z L ��:� 'LV�:'-L'LF ,_ � _ lUli tltFtlF t'�It1�:,ld[. e � �T-�- ��1N(Ilfllflllll�I 1►Nii1�i rill(Ilill�lll`r llllllllllll��llll{*-- i�.,t °G1ti�i es�a6ttt ai �.�ii - _ 7�U,, � ��`. �- .. ..,t., 7� �4F`• �.�� ._ �. E 4 � _��,.__' I AI _�� =f b���--'—�—:i:.'.:�=sue � T•1r v�rt t�`t k C-lU tFitrt T. };L.D=LA. �!I�L*TS'ZC P VS � � ICY I©N � IT"� I'I..A 9�i� "�'onlhYl�l ��1vci,_ 1, = 3 , r s � � '. - L RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING THE MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 80-02 " VNEREAS, the .2l anning Commission conditionally approved the abovo-described Conditional' Use Permit on the 26th day of November,_ 1980. WHEREAS, on the 12th day"of November, 1986, the Rancho. Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to- consider the above-described modification. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cusaaonga Planning Commis1�Yon resolved as follows; SECTIOR 1: That the fcllowiig 'findings can be mete'r! 6 1. ,That the proposed use is,. in accord_.xith the General Plan, the objectifies of the De.=velopment_ oes,,and the purposes of ! the distric in which which the site is located. 2. That 'the pr;pc+sed use, together with the =,conditions applic*�le th to, will not be detrimental to the public healtK_ safet�,` or welfare, or ma;,4rially irJurious to properties or i provewnt,s} ft the v`;tAty. 3. That the proposC-1 use coaipli s with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code,. SECTION 2: This project is exeei�ti-from environmental evaluation based on ZSTW67na Environmental Qur1.'*rvi Act (r)EQA', Article 19,, Section 15301, the minor, alteration_ or mainter,anoe of Jexistng public or private structures. SECTION 3e That the mod=ficatiok:to Conditional Use Permit 80-02 is approved su ec "fo the following conditions: 1. ?"e site shall be developed and maintainer in accordance with the approved plans (which include architectural treatment, -exterior materials and color, and landscaping) on file with the Planning Division, :he Conditions cont:,Ined therein, and Developw.dt Code regulations. Requests to modify any of theabove, shall be approved by the Planning CoaMssion pria?r to somrencing work ,,er issuance of building permits. j 2. Approval of the modification to this Conditional UserPermit shall not waive compliance with any Sprcial or S1;andard Conditions of Re,(lution 80-69. I IM Resolution No. C4:' 8642 - Brown Page 2 AMOYED AND ADOPTED THI s 12TH DAY OF,NOVEMBER. ,I985. PLANNING COMISSIGH OF THE CITY OF GUCAZ.ONGA BY: Denis L. Sl aura, raimIn Arti+ T: ra, v0jer. Deputy- cre ry 1. Brad Buller, Deputy.Se&retar; of-the Planning Comission of %--. Rancho-Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the'foragoi;,g Resolution was duly and Nularly introduced. passed, 4ind a&Aed by the P?�inniing` Commission of till City of Rancho CucaiOnga,'at a regular meeting of the Planning Comission held on the I2th day of November, 1886Y by the following vote;�torwit: ` AYES: COiaMISSIONERS HOES: COWISSIONERS� ABbLNT. COMMISSIONERS: r r r E f �.1 +i t R — - CITY OF RANCHO CUCANOITG4 ,STAFF REPORT � T r ` DATE: November 12 1986 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Comni�siorr FROM: Brud Buller, City Planner r "BY: Alan Warren, Associate Planner �. SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANO DEVELOPPIENT . ,DISTRICT -U ":: CUCkMOVIA COUNTY-RATi€1R DMkTT C regves eidan a Development District MMap from "FL" (Flood Control to "GC" (General Cnnercial) for 1.06 acres of land located on the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard Dina San D;ego Avenue (a portion of APN Z07-101- 43). I. PROJECT AND SITE.DESCRIPTION: A. c�ion Re"ueq s 4-d—i ' proval of Devem-li, ,it District Am3ndment adIssuance of a negative declarati ff l B. rUrrounding Lana Use and Zoning: l Nar h - ucareonga tree *3orm irannel, Flood Control (FC) South - General Commercial (GC) East - General Commercial (GC) West Flood Control (FC) C. General Plan Desi natians: ro��clt :i k6 - om?teresa1_ North F'ood Cr.trol SJuth uommenl. East Comm r-,_Iai. y'-st Road Control 0. Site Characteristics: The site is a vacant piece of land with a gra3uz7 soa . er y 'slope bordered on the south by Foothill Boulevard, on the east by San Uiego Avenue and on the west and north by the Cucamonga Creek Storm Channel. ANALYSIS: General_ Th;s Development District Amendment is a property ^�' 4itiated proposal to bring the subject rite into with existing General .Plan land use designation. would extend the existing general commercial JILu Foothill from Vineyard Avenue west to the Flood Cont�E, The purpose of the application is to facilitate -we subdivision of surplus Cucamonga County Watir District property. q ITEM( 0 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission, November,12, 1986 ODA86-Cl Page 2 i While fOe site is within the Foothill Corridor Study Arepi the revi£w rd determination of a�sr�i#1 (1.05 acre) site shorjld not detrimentally affect the study process, The ad hoe- advisory committee has recommended a similar 'cOrmnity commercial'" designation fd"r this area of Foothill Boulevard. 0. .EnvironmentO Assessment: Staff has ?Yrepared an environmental initial 'SYU"kly and detelvminert that the zone change will not create any, si9nifican^; adverse i%pacts,-.upon the enli+ronment. However, there may be i►.�pacts associated Wth future commmerciai development that could be mitigated 'prior to development approved by the following applicable mitigation raasure: 1. Potential� Impacctt,, Future -^omnerc�ial development wa�cccu�r n-close proximity to a `known ground tault ion the southside of Foothill Boulevard). Ali itation: City policies require,'a geologtc study 1 he s e priov-to development Ond a minimmu 100 foot bui ldiiii setback from any,' confirmed' fault location. 2. potential Immvact: The site its immediately ao-�cpnt qP to the ucamange Creek and this acts%l will rR su t t in commercial development adjacent to th x major- drainage area. Miti htion: The creek has been covitained vil-hin an mprov storm channel facility which Will safely direct flood raters away from adjacent properties. These and any other impacts will be m1tigated through existing City Ordinances and Policies governing development approval- ' Projects are reviewed for { conformance with, development standards prior to ff approval for construction, I11. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The following findings are necessary for .pprovai og t�"appT#cat4on: I (a).ZiNe subject property is suitable for the proposed `land use in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in surrounding areas. ib) The proposed district change brti'1 not have a significant it act on the environ4;nt or surrounding properties. (c) The proposed uevelopment District Amendment: is in conformaAce with the General Plan. <"v` hairm � and members of th4 Planning Commission November 32, x98fi si Page 3 ,1 Staff believes these findings can be spade � this project. IV.. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has bees advertised as aalub#ic 'sparing inthe a y�Re ort newspaper, the property posteaL; and notices f were sent 5 property owners within anti feet of 'this project site. v RECOMMENDATION: is recomnded that the Planning—Commission consQr all`-i�sput and if after such cons#derati�n, she commission Lan support the facts for findings, adoption of the att,.,hed resolution, 'and issuance of a negative declaration wo*10. be apprcpri atsr aeu, y �sn t d, City Planner BB.AW.-vc Attachments: Exrihit "A" - Area Map Efiibit "8" Locati,'gn Map Resolution of Approval l- 1 i I 1: e j li 0P. NC fit; OPalp L ; eat all FC ► L� CCSC --� nIN JL 1C I� C1 L` cc cm NORTH CITY Or IT ctiI: D.D.A 6 -07 RANCHO CUCA',N'I01'GA TITLE: j PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBITi- A _5G\CE _. � � f v w � 1 14 xt� P.4M9 06 uo la VAZAUT pis C►.C:YA9.1T 0 NibsELT poop s lY 4 � 2EcT9.U¢A1►1T �lljtLE ��� Syr A-t 34I �t Ty u! CITY a- ITEM. D.t_.. a,L, RAINCHO CL7 A.TMGNGA TITLE: rr PLANNING DIVISION 'EXHIBM-S-SCALD 0_ RESOLUTI&:,NO. MF A RESOLUTION .L`�F���. HE RANCHO CUCAliONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RFuOMMENDIWO �FROVAL OF DIST�,iCT CHANGE NO. 86-07, rs 4ST-11C _A, ICHANGE IN. THE DISTRICT;.DESIGNATION FROM FLOOD' CONTROL (FC), TO GENERA. 'COMMERRA: (GC) FOR 1.US ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON 'THF, KOR'TKAE;,T CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND,SAN DIEGO AVENUE (A PORTION OF APN�t97-101- 43)« ? WHEREAS, or•,• the a[H day of October, !98E an application was filed and accepted on the above-described project,='-and WHEREAS, on the 12th day of November, '1986,,;the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the Californian Government Code. SECTION 1: The, Rancho Cucar,K>nga Planning Commission has made the followipg7- ndl g thg subject property is suitable for the uses permittenc . irti the propotted 41stri�ct in terms of Acce;a sizu,' and c6mi patibility with existic,g land use in the surrounding area, and �, , t; z. That the prenosed distr°ic cha,ge riould 'not;-have significant impact on the,; environment nor the surrounding properties; and 3. That, the proposed'distri;-t change is in conformance with the General Plan. SECTION z: The Rancho Cucamonga ?lanning Commission has fcend that; this proje-c-f-w-fl—not create a significant adverse imact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on November 12, 1.986. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section L5850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 12th day of November, 1986, District Change No. 86-07t 2, lie Planning Commission hereby recommends that the C;ty Council approve and adopt Change No. 86-U7., 3. Tftat a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded.-to the City Council. AW i; Resolution ya. y4, / DDA 86-07 r Page 2 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF NU MBFR, 1586. { PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCW) CUCARONGA }.'> fDennis ." tout, Chairman i' .. ATTEST: bra Buller, Deputy Secretary I, Brad Buller, Depu+y Secretary,of the. Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby:� rtify that the foregoing Resolut.on vras duly and . regularly introduced, passed; and adopted by the Planning Coisnaissi6n of the `C+ty of Rancho Cucamonga, at'a regular meeting of the Planiing Commission held I on thell2th day of Novembar, 1$86, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COhM155IONERS: NOES,, COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONER$: K r f 7 � c;{ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPOkf z v 1977 DATE: November 12, 1986 I TO: Chairman and members of the Planning Commission FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior' Civil Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Assistant Civil Engineer )i SUBJECT: EN RONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL 'MAP 10223 - Arica7 Vie`+t1e-s nc. su v s on of 4.24 acres o and rota � parce s a the Industrial Park district, subarea 6, 'located on the Northeast Corner of 6th Street and Haven. Avenue (APR Z09- 411-15) L PROJECT AND SIT1_DESCRIPTION. , F^i A. Acton Re nested: Approvaruf the proposed Tentative Parcel Map as s owa on xhi6if 118" B. Parcel Size: arce - 2.07 acres Parcel 2 - 2.17 acres Total - 4.24 acres C. Existing Zoning: Industrial Park, Subarea No. 5 of the Industrial Specific Plan ; D. Surrounding Land Use: Nor - vacant South Vacant East; Vacant West - Existing Industrial E. Surroundin General Plan and Development Code Desi nations: North - industrial Park, Subarea South - Industrial Park, Subarea 6 i East - Industrial Park, Subarea 6 I West - Industrial Park, Subarea 6 F. Site Characteristics: The �te is vacant and slopes approximately 1% from north to the south. I r; ITEM P f< r TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Cowission SUBJECT: Envivppmental Assessment and-;entat`'IV Parcel Map 10223 DAtE: November 1�, 1,086 + PAGE'c;fit ` II. ANALYSIS: The purpose of this map is to create''separate parcels fOf the two office buildings approved by Planning Commission as 0. . 86-07, on June 25, 1986. The relationship of the parcel lines to to approved project swte is shown on Exhibit "C". 'The public streets adjacent to the site are improved with the`�exception of sidewalk, street lights, drive approaches and�,,landscaping which are required tgwon development en a parcel by parcel-basis. ,? III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Stu y. Staff conducted afield investigation and completed Part II of the Initial Study. , No adverse impacts upon!` the environment are anticipated as a result of this project.— Therefore, issuance of Negative Declaration .s appropriate.� i r niece. `. pP P � IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of PuW is Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has alco.been comp eted. ,3 V. RECOMMENDATION: It is r;lcommended'that the Planning Commission consider all input an � elements of the Tentative Parcel Map. If after such consideration, the Commission can recommend approval, then the adoption w of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate., Respectfully submitted, Barrye R. Hanson Senior Civil Engineer DRH:BK:me Attachments: Vicinity Map (Exhibit 'W) Tentative Map (Exhibit "B") Resolution and Recommended Conditions of Appr11Wa?..> M P;L }, REt50 UTION NO, ARESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CtNISSIt]`i OF THE CITY OF .,� RANCHO CUCAMONGA,' CALIFORNIA, Ct .5 1,ONAL!Y� APPROVING x TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP(,�1499 10,223 jj WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map` Numbers i6223, submitted ,by Arical Properties, Inc., applicant, for the purpose of subdividing %tn 2,parcels, � the real property situated in the Citv of Rancho Cuc.Qq znga,'1Caunty of San Bernard,:ia, State of Califiornta, iilE�11fied as APN(s)-209-414�1S, located on the Noi_heast Corner of"6th Street-and Haven Avenue; and WHEREAS,.�jn Noves4!�er `12, 1986, the Planning Commission helgj;a duly adrgEetised publlcfhearing .for i:he above-described map. 1 NOW; THtkEFORE, THE RANCHO'GiiCAfIAM,PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings havv •,�e been made Y 1. That the map it ,onsiste�t with the Geleral Plan:' 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site it' ph�sicalf . suitable f�;r the proposed develrpment. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting, property. } SECTION 2; That Tentative Parcel Map No. '10223- s he,^eby approved ?` subject to the attached- Standard Cont�itions and the folljwing Special Conditions: Special Conditions 1, A rect,•acal O"i`eway easement for Angresslegress over the drivew=4 from Haven Avenue for the bg�efit of the property to the North shall be recorded prior to recordation •af the parcel map. J $ /� t r S RESOLUTION PAGE 2 i 2, Eristiag overhead utilit.ias: r Al, Haven Avenue - An in lieu fee as contribution to the future uS�dErgrounding of the existf'rg overhead utilities ( elecomruniration anG electrical, except_ for 66 k.v. `1 electrical") on the opposi�p side of Haven Avenua .shawl be paid to the City on a parcel by`parcel basis prior to building permit issuance for each paecel4 The fee shall.be one-half the adopted unit amount tiimes the length fram the centerline of 6th 1 het to the, noith project boundary (5661). } 'i b? 6th Street The e*,isting overhead utilities lit (telecommunication and electrical) on the project side of 6th Street shall be undergrounded from the first.,pole an the west side of r°Haven Avenue to the first pole eae� of:the project boundarly prior, to public improvement acceptanc.7 ur occupancy, whichever occur: first, Reimbursement for one-half the adopted cost of urdergrounding from 6ture development as it occurs on the opposite side of the street it jeasible because the property is undeveloped. x APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF November, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO'CUCAMONGA (/ k BY: •ennis L. Stout, hatrman ATTEST: Brad Buller, eputy' cre wry I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning commission of the City-of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the forlooing Resolution was duly anei regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of Vfi City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of November, 1986, by the following vote-to�wit: AYES: COWT";LONERS: NOES: COMM,TSSIONERS: ' ABSENT: C"ISSIONERSc i P- 4 } C • ` yN Y+ OT 01 S V V4 N •O I A s A�� C M .rN "s' N gg g • V IL —�•�! LZ '�. L is Z.Milk � $ba »ai w �3 $}rla ge 0 p y S 3j N �► �1Ya ^~ip• 8 > yT� if 6+Y YY gg� ism lc4 ^ � — g •d •Ma VQ M O gb 0 fit` �.^ • � � �. y Y�6$ � �•!N �L� �rL vs- of f I I } P- I i we i�r`a" Nam' aM Eli Ce= S 12 Y ~ IRS pppy C e✓yyyypy� N } L L e4pY �4 i�C YL�, tea= l V T L C e YiY LY 4i 4.21 sa o rh g £gs a ^� aLs 8 r Y,.,. Y IN p- , TIMMMM70!1:117 elw . r, i ��tlJ .• u r.,oa ,ns• ram � ( ��y� hd,I.. ` � Poar2 ; Pa! -4. 1 r Par 102ora.e a 6, ar, 1 PUr Par,t 9rAC rrolae per D: .'rFAC Iasstc o Par. - Px 12. ( 11 Para a�9 v .. 92tac.WA 4 Pact L;•srr ra,...et r1 f L 1 � f /'d Pa,3 14 Ltd 9.10 4C 9r7AC Para tj '-t-- 6Mr--- CITY OF : RA ItUl. M6P ►02-Z- RANCHO C UCAMC►IO GA Tt' M v i LI N ITY Mae EtGG DON Lxmm. » A P_ k.M ca 14 p .4 q Yo ,' O ` a• i i �• aq4r� Ilk, 41 All Ill ' V i � �as �,d� � :�,�,� t I► r� ; 3 I �Il r� ) —1 ws.mow•�,` .ems vrr .«.s,.vwr P— C � �.j�� a eI�` �"��"� �• � A /4 r ay KUr w CITY OF RANCliC CUCAMONGA ra STAFF RE, RT �° tic9^ y a A o v .> ,SATE: November 12, 1986 1977. ii i TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission .t FROM: Brad Puller, City Planner BY: Debti Meier, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSkNT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86-22 M The eve opmen o a- , square o0 iindustriar building on 2.1 acres of land in the General Industrial 'District (Subarea 13) located on the east side of 6th Street north of Buffalo Avenue - APN 229-261-13. I. PROJECT.MD SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Acti.jn Requested: Approval of siti plan ane elevations and issuance of a Negative Declaration. i B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: 'ndorsn - Vineyard; Industrial-Speciitc Plan (Subarea 13) South - Vineyard; Industrial_ Speci'Ac Plc-n (Subarea 13) East - Viney3rd; Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 13) West - Warehouse Distribution Facility; Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 11) C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - generalnUstrial North General Industrial South - General Indu;'M.irl East General Industirial West General Industrial D. Site Characteristics The site, ' and properties around it remain as t .neyar s. The land slopes gradually from north 4o south at a rate of about 2%. Sixth Street is improved with curb, gutter, and median island up to the northerly property 1 ir:e. II. ANALYSIS; A. General: The.project consists of one industrial building with w�ossible entry plazas and lunch courtyards. Loading areas are recessed into the building to heip mitigate views from 6th Street. ITEM Q PLANNING COW1SSFON STAFF REPORT 1 DR 86-22 - Kaplan November. 12, 1986 Page'2 8. Design Review Committee: The Committee reviewed the project and recommendedcertain modifications "- to architectural treatment and site planning. The following revisions to the project were reviewed and approved by the Committee dt a second meeting: Architecturai Treatment 1. On the west building elevation (6th Street frontage), eliminate the white paint ut.d substitute sandblast surface. Provide fluted patterr, in all the recessed areas. (Revised as s:.om in Exhibit "V.) 2. The fluted pattern must have a depth and size that is readable from 6th Street :example of size and pattern is that used on Coca Cola'buiiding). (Conditioned) 3. On the south `elevation, within the loading wells, eliminate the white strip and substitute the chocolate in its place. . (Conditioned) 4. The roil-up doors should be, ;,ainted to match the building and not accented. QConditioned) 5. The loading wells, visible from 6th Street, should be screened by use of an 8 toot decorative wail along west and south boundaries of parking lot. (Conditioned) Site Planning 1,. Parking stalls for truck trailers will be provided by eliminating "one< dock door at each loading well, thereby providing a dock-high door with a Earking space adjacent. (Revised as shown in Exhibit B'.) 2. The site plan shall provide the 5 foot setback at the north boundary by sitding the building southerly, and losing 5 feet in the drive aisle behind the vehicular parking area at the south building elevation. (Revised as shorn in Exhibit OV.) C. Technical Review Committee: The Committee recommended e following con ions:'' 1. Along property boundaries, trees shall be planted at the rate of 1 tree per 30 linear feet of interior property line. Tree clusters may be used to satisfy specific design objectives. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF' REPORT ? �> . DR 85-22 = Kap7�.n November 12, MOO F Page 2. The emergency access is to.bP�uesigned with limited access curb and turf block_i',o limit this access to emergency, vehicles`only.. D. Environmental r,Ass?ssmet t: Upon review of Part I of the Tnil; 3 u y, ana"'Eahpl—completion of Part II of. the Environmental Checklist, staff has found no significant impacts L rebated to• the devel01C ent of the propoied industrial buiidinN. III FACTS"FOR FYNDINGS This project is ccnsistent with the Industrial ip c Plan and the, General Plan. The project will not be detrimental ..o adjacent ,properties or cause' significant environmental impacts. In addition, the propcded site plan =and building design, together with the recommended Conditions of 4 Approval, are in compliance with;the Induitriai Area Specific Plan and City Standards. w_ r IV. RECOM+IENDATION: Staff recwv ends approval of Development Review - rouges—adoption of the attached Resolution. and Conditions of Approval and issugCle of a Negative Declaration s r' Res fully2t[, Brad Bu er City P anner 88:DI4:ns Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "B" - Conceptual Grading Plan j Exhibit "E" - Building Elevations and Resolution 1 of Approval with Conditions Ask i 1 s Q-3 a, M9& AC Par Past Par •Pair. 4;jPcrB .610AC L1384C , aG �• E am.r Par.6 4 SM AC ',Sf, 13.6%ACMot t 2 At Alf' A 1 ' 46 16 AC. rr f ..4 Ip / •...���"'"'.v`~� � �,, Wit? � ' �2d ' 41 42 4,39 RC. f3 I 'i NORTH CITY OF ITEM I. ,�' 1p RAINCHO CUCATTIOO\GA. TITLE:ImZ AA1 "Wig ' PLANNING DI". iSIO+I F-XHiBiT. _,4 SCALD. fit— Ash, w - C:,PASE SpXaG�i7. T 1 � �e,�fir• Az N bct s J � �CAEtM•1 h.4T• Ort�.d.� I t- Slued ' lam' �J NORTH CITY Off' IT£1I �°Z RAINCHO CUCATIVIOINGA TITLE.-1014r PLANNING DIZ'ISIO.N EXHIBIT=�._. .SCALE: Q-5 a v { p • 1 VW Jo j 4iGuo�R[KYR .. _ blrtOcRY�tot i it NORTH CITY OI ITEM:_lJ� -•��' RANCHO CUC MONGA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISION G\HIRM-992f SCALE: 1 „+ Yh Ms w- { J AD• As t• �f tY nr trw�t..cw .a Y/�� t+ t .�!` �7;•m�e.r•.sj ef if re r �v if r r rr r x iv �i � {1 a �s.w�A•�•n. ...w..i � y Z• s t J �!, 1� ' NORTH CITE' Or ITEM: M RANCHO CUCATMONGA TITLE= .- - _ PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: 47 SC ALE BAST ELEVATIe�N LF!1 ir7P,L�1� . IH .. ew�.rr w ter. rrsM ! f-` i i t Hl. I, doNTH GL ENsT1014 ��� ,.,�. �' �� i ! i li. Mra crw.avee.«r+l -.• s +«a ri Mill Nc�iT BLE V4TtON- fALoNCT Oir.TH bTRLGT) .--hcwrfmi�+�, ."'-'°�L•y aaw ,_ewJ�i...r a7w�aa.• j .ouTa BLEVaTtoN CITY OF ITEM RANCHO CUCAVIONGA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISION F-milt3m SCALE- F � _. {, 4 ILI, Ji RESOLUTICN NO. fTR, A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION as APPROVING DEVELORYENT REVIEW NO. 86-22 LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SIGH STREET NORTH OF THE BUFFALO AVENUE INTERSECTION IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT q WHEREAS, on the 24th day of September, 1986, a complete application �. was filed by Donald and Linda Kaplan for review of the above-described ' project; and, WHEREAS, on the 12th day of November, 1906, the Rancho "Cucamonga Planning C;:Aissi6n held a meeting to consider the above-described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following can be'met: ' 1. That the P rf;�osed project �st nt with the P j is cons e objectives o�/the General Plan; and 2. That .the proposed use is in accord with the objective bf the Industrial Specific Plan and the purposes of the -district in which the site is located; and ;r 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial. Specific Plan and Development Code; and 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materiaely in,juri;ous to properties or improvements in the vici,- :.y•` SECTION That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environmen ar, at a Negative Declaration is issued on November 12, 1986. SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 86-22 is approved subject to the follow -9 con tions and attached Standard Conditions: Planning Division: 1. The loading wells visible from 6th Street shall be screened with an 8 foot decorative wall consistent II with the building materials along west and south boundaries of parking lot. Resolution No. OR 86-22 Kaplan Page 2. The fluted pattern shall have a depth.and size that Is readable from 6th Street (example of size and pattern is that used on Coca Cola building.) Full material samples shall be submitted to Planning Division for' ',eview and approval prior to issuance of building ptmits. 3. On the south elevation, within the loading Ys ls, the white color band shall be substituted with the color of chocolate. 4. The roll-up doors shall be pasted to match the building and not accented. S. Specimen size canopy shade trees sliall ba provided in the outdoor plaza areas. Also, provide some separation from entry, and usable court area by use of low profile walls, plant materials, or other screening concepts. & The court area shall be shielded from 6th Street with the use of low profile walls and plant materials. E 7. Provide an entry statement at the drive approach by using accent specimen trees, annual color, and other appropriate decorative treatment. 8. Along property boundaries, trees shall be planted at the rate of 1 tree per 30 linear feet of interior property line. Tree clusters may be used to satisfy specific design objectives. 9. The emergency access shrill be designed with limited access curb and turb block to limit this access to emergency vehicles only. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON A BY: j ennis L. Stout, airman ATTEST: ra Buller, Deputy Secretary ,, ff Resolution No. DR 86-22 - Kaplan 9 Page 3 .,, I, Brad B-iller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City ,of Rancho Cucamonga, do hfreby certify that the foregoing Resolution YAs duly and regularly-introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Coamfssion tof the City of Rancho Cucamonga$, at a regular meeting of the Pbnning•Commission held i on the 12th day of November, 1986 by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COWISSIONERS. NOES: COMMISSIONERSt ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: R I 1 ' as ,j Q.O .} QY. ^pS.Gd OCL Ly2Y y6�OV VL Lyv ✓`NA Cq +u Ln t.O iN al't ` LASS rve �� LV OL W-�L g4Qu+ NsNO .q 4y 6 G gGY�Y .. L u mY� V>d b^V YL Ly.. O...oY® �•, A �.Gi` n1i ilUw Y� L� f,'Gy4' VY �q apa }oaj�ly�. L p a V 2 Ccc •� p�.wpL L n O cAi N 6. g.p.+RMG �q� Cd�NV .Soj� iayi V`t C" Y s ^ O Y G C'uQ a w w YvN.. Ol`G�',• G A Cyy'W •'�� a wiN.J^�ROyl yt Qy t;.O.�Guwi ���. q��NO �._` q.V^V�.`. H'J./ L u N G L fit VV C i M QC 7 q !✓ i Kq y �uYwV a'si QOo V U .. Z{ P.n ..� Qcc pq�YIgNL •Cpa � CN +OMS Cq�pGpb ..t N C»k Yq7 � G >f JwO upt d...yuS gTyi �Y aG O Z. 8 d6sEA �K L b��„ LLd V q Gpa" N .S8 Y tl. Cmp y�0O ..Lyrq., �wQ am �A yg MNq N60QQ+'y F ECp ,r PLiM d�:4� »�CV1,r GL 8 �VGOY. d� aQ G�uG a S z- QO>W�N^+yw. any A �LGG r�.�..NN 12, _.�tOV�.. .0 4Y.GW:I.• �M yamy. m R 'gin> b 'O l t�L ioi.. vp q� pY b L tzGn, RZ zuA :5 Q V G p N N N L ,S y \' � 1_•., VNC N C +A++C 5Yg�.9W� A G��L a`y• RR - s ao.y � o �d. `q oG oa ram. i{eS.�GsoY� p'4, ri Q-f3- I r - v� pro<c a+e Aa ci ao A�oc: v a�fi�a abi gq. b o=de... .s4.T Z a a o �t a u u o ca i W L L~nn o t- O.b GCR.roGW a.� !'�C. yam. +p� r•u�'«o b N� o�4 �w•�ua uL L€�b ENV YY L$°WN da � J Y9✓ aS..Y.A d«N.Gt I�O Ya=iC 'pW✓'fl�q 'Wf• E "" q'.. `C a =� Ny a bL Oy EYL+. y +• dtt gY N S Y h 5NS so^ a�q�3 a� apa m= �cNY x L_c3 9a 4�W v1 G.. V jroC L gGV q 6 aN 4 C1 S YLs- 40 C r:. CO « N dNP �'.Eq A}•AL roud � N L6 Yd ' V bCC� .G�api udi9 .�9a■N4.Q Eq0^Y}.Z cz, v Vgyd •p Y'o �Y.cmi uN'Y•i�YGy.u.GLW. Z,25w, hoc u. •'nu c� L pN�gn �.01 Y'�,N c�$ia co.E�'e 4t c.W. e a«. « •oL•iL .. ,e®} gi cCC..� a3'�Ap Yu scvAn� �� NtV.oc c Y C W L O �Ali CSC. d O�,dG� «�n'•U C NF m Q L .II q'4 p tl G Q mup.• rK ,tC Lq 1=i�V..✓ c Y Y.✓ N A O O M w N 0��A'�Y Y q M.�} p 1'�.'.:bM s C d; q. L 9 Y_ Y^C NOdO L OIL `W 3.. yA• �yy §� p ■ ��ll Ap �OC� .. 0Y G^ y� y u.Yb.Y4 C q�0 �!•�L 01L�.L Y� V�O L9. VC� Y� v cN y Li1�1i 'S api a« rS�d •���:�.aiNacS E''y$.' I.G. =m g sus$$ Jai f m N .r3 V.�';.. O'rC aW� .may. A �• «pGUN. .`V.AL.o;bola ue•.'c OQQ -« pp CCpp QQQQ ..L L oy_o �a•Q j4 47 rpi6 NYC C� W pUOL��,LN j04�Q$� UOp=N Y y` Y L G A ua W u L.:yl ro t C✓ 2.c C a.'CO w L p ` `a u 6 « �.N J d L q Y r a« N _�ffi Np'Q C N N O.✓'•i - • «�4 �yWy U01n. 'yGL A '• (}3N aC�. W.^p aO N� '^WV2 •Oi•Ltp Y �OfON` fJ{,p C� a 0 M« Y ro a 4✓ S Sap + ^dNC A «V NBC �� 0o GL Y.Y A�.LyV UY4y�O p.G LL .V N dot Z Odi i 2� 'GP'�YLL YL Pam e.el y.�r G U ee= « CC U✓ c U d p O _ ppL.�Syy b qLW � VW.-�1LL2. 4. �WC LCbY COdWLO.N V dq SOY�N aU tp�alV.l p:..QL.�bCbO Od O= C4Q , LO C . N =bCpOG � pa.ayp} CI A H E L� q}•.J E.y 0 4 N.)� q�. �Y Y OC�..L•L LN.Y • N O b N 4�� fJ G«i A S A ba • q YL• �. '�. �•V y�U a F•W1rN Cpt` o,n � o d ■ 6 G...� C b aM U9 L a �p 01A.Cb G �L� V. V G G b U L L OL L Y9C .•.� ::r �9YM tlpl pp O. <ro p,Lp r N6 1-L NCI q:Na Y YYY pU.N trr,,�• N.W�! •C �u.'1 C^`n�Lug�. L x NC W I-•rG.w�6V y h� LQAO CO .,a =G._ Ru aM oo..d+rvly �.i N TuC« � R I.GLi q J Ayy ^ rs A= a ivlr Q�� o , do, a or-a N0.�d O N gypp C .� d G A O E 4 t 1 6 KI Q p� ROTYV 4 <Ld� 1. a'y0 GN 3 uR4 d- �" ward N^Wu bpao Yee gjL 'ry yL ddpA� Od d �N ` N=Ry @ O � iN �y yqg pb G¢(dCr�Nr O aA eN..�WCC O u< a IGNN np Q W Q V C Q yL .G G "� .0 rnV Q�� 'S` 6^CO D.Y VCq <.�; q ya`. 1 a d^A S. IL q 1J! V.� q O. y C nu d+L Q O g V C D•Y.A d.C �{q NCI G n.-a'-��'O C�f 1_ �V b N� a L�_C i L� .�.` "C'ao -dr. '^� >.c«.ar. dpW 7{ LR�a� w9 �otl N :. W Iz O '+r L P N L N d b?��9Y R P= CNd` OCt Iqq V Od LY .6YaO.0 AL VD �NL t`L• w9 � G eL dL H^ 'zL a g Y .X q Q a d b d Y Y ACT �6 O W Y Rtl.. 'cu re ty.EQ N. i ypdyp.n A�. -ECM 9V «wy aN cc -99 �yy 3iN rC LCbC �V N w<nNnyyl 6w QN �N.O I�hF <N:u.^^til'a NO.O Lq3D6 4V tLO p.N O 7 , a•a v aura =c gad `o' ,o on,aR ems. alTi e`Lia�.qQo. E C:r eN FO GN A a N^ L.pC OS r d C �N LYn ApC CyCLn >N o L� r:s Lu u. u ^-51. u^�N. o.c2 V G'y= G A 4N a7O.II b CC U q _ O.� Nw NN. tyy N+C � i 7w 6LL+ yy.wN. R��� adpD�NL d q a ti N N 4 WO t to W q yCC w W L a C j T L yV�1 d q e a GC �d 4y Y 'A� . 6y^ V o� ouu�. .r.W y Ldr. aUw3C.f1> t:u.Cn CLtl a V9-0 LyC A 4.e V�uC N^' dY0.�0 wC•�� b Qyy. r�6O N b4 qd V. N V 69 ap Q wV Ce,yatp � �A$. y Rt" A pL jgtl^�yg C�.L V n Y e 9 Y L A G O L G 6 b . Gr�^Y 2^ >. d 6 iA ULd y.^. ,C ^Lta Ld Ga O. `� ^L Lw0<4 rw{{�1� ZLp�y, Kit qD � 4a+N0 6At�m 9 QQ N l+GW6t) 6Q NONrq .0'.06. KNOTN 4I0.6.+Nu N.O 'I a - a-IS •i ---------- Ell - N KK? EG yid Y.�L y C ~ g=A Ou'^G 4b y? W "' Y 4yy .a+^L1LA Vp W i L `V 4 Q a G n N yU O.s y � �f.t0 Q1wxu SpAo s L� C p .. 4. a YL 'dja•.�dC AY S.N L O" V d Ada Onn 04P aYO C .N L�r+ xi ^ Z- v np a`- c N .W Mo ad Ae«Gev waL d $- O a+ w 4 r. OrG M OUq OP d a VLF VyGJrp'b � w mW l)w.p t La 4�T x Pb O. y�'A4. Y 5 .6td '^ ipi LLq !00! [�V AU�UY �C{q}... Mv4S Q. % CY yn`•�. � 4 qwd OgCe Gq` GY -` HA>.N.Nw eu6 C ¢q.r. pC� C ,q.�Y W �y�y C�r 2qG N4 #1e tom. ..qeb� U nY M .ACV Rq.� G �dY K 2 y. YCy r."+ d Ce 61iM CO� NC g • iVLu nU qU nr N�9 U Y. W Nir La N Cl NGa L ,ter aUt?w. "M Gyyy�TL. dCd �r. C LC� p {L O UN r { 4 µ �4. yV& C O�Y Jay{ O.jUO �G die. M q L aN ad O•m.0 FI �Q��. awe N C A �M wA+ ��VILO�e LM�Ho�C �q9 a d w T O B 4 X a 0 a el S.Y d1 t R G N M 6 Q Y� 'rG-o ZjZjZjZjZj t=dY ntE+ a i iL k {G a a o ci iu i Y�i GC Y«...n tC•nG.�' �. vYi N a 5r m c � qn ig) A4t} �• rG""a+ �e. Ct ail G oL.rG. B. Fib n �u V rg.�. Z L �n pp �. a s+'ij .•u• q� ' Yu N..aiU N4'3 ya4CCn �@@.ppn. 4�Y � 9� u NA '-'•.~a 13 �•A M A D V 6t Y AM La Oa A LY a2A R Lam.. aytt Oy •+d e9 ar+ 4 "to 6. 4piA. �L t'. L1 6 v CyL6 N r69 N G NaaeW C yGiAr OA�,I NN Ct qt 152 L "d aPr Db fJ r -ObSN itiE 0.9 VG Aqr R a t.0..t. L L N R LF QH~ N9 ON elate .Gr ^ ffdd L.G N,.�.y qr N.s ,e iN=e "•' q.. w C o ..G.A I .anal @Ao- tl may. TGw AO �,Ny6 yam. qe �y:C Y G q P 4 C a d � V e edLti 6+ "'N ww� 4rYU C^ � O Mugae +6 q N fV � d ?��A ppr6GG 4. lV S L fl1 L N y •••C'O r d L R Y� P� Y.1 0� I.:; I d yaN 4 CPraa..�� r bD. 6N ?q Y 1.i rNa N„ C p 1'.0.0 C.0 edN E O F 11C A N 3 `^ � 4o G a l{t" Foo 5a5€� i rr mCi L c y Y r N L.YY•Gl N LZ•�i L� lE. •nL M.A Y auu M � ` °� � N 4II=aGGY'o' VC Y _� �tl � + cy.. J + m pGC w g a444 L Y GII=•. i73w eepu1 'Y� Lo CppC yxy �yy +CC i y, 9 B. i y0� •.. Q� 52. ZN Kr 6L. 04 d Ax 4 QL II L O + C M - y 9 S L a II J Y CC ® $ M_ Y F Y 01�. d • Lu l� IIZ �Opi L LPV b � °� Ol � GNP L+«w ndL Cp CC Cp d L —.. Yp EII'10., YYO.N.°• s_� Yu Sb w�a v 5g s� n� u�c�. IIam� •.do++ �.L. .Lu n .�. e L n•e. +� L Y- a cr a L ,Y'o. q o `.c Y: "• w� q- p•. gc�q At L» rot -$¢° �c 8u.. y� h� CNC �M G= !. Y♦ ` GC LN Y� ppL p..a.:.^ o qp^ Lae uoY �L aw y d11O1: LII�O H¢«p— n= Zb &L a«_. ".p.. Y•..w� p eu II y.y 0 —y yII � w� di 4a1 —pY a O O • Cf ONp O+ >.r C S_ q°'Gf �OY.. PC -•E �.ti u�bV '� d L� O.II a �pC� p'1 u� Nam^ N Tw'..b N^ Ii�. d.M N O.y N•M YVII� w�a 1.� II �. q_ � Y O r� y w O�y � a• N a�C. Ls h, 4 e.y C1w D• L Q.°i O� qB •L _t yN �� � _E 2V.N 4II p OrAAQ T � Y r C "• y `N � °O.y 0 VI V.V N� pp G N d Y .a u n NI n) rl. nL� Q- �7 sour ,� PjK Sk L'�'s L.rC ! yuoE ad, 7ESNE L' o.e.S alas` J. 4 •uCuC V IV... W Ot O V. .p �_� �c LQ LA -• P E L q C Sg Yeh L NMgqe m "s 3 L_, s.L C 01pC� L uall.6 p Cy�. OY 1ii!�■p? A CC j .ter. �C sw• 9 �o.r 4 NV=si .SSW u_ N V'P4SG'.. u V Y ggV $V Y �`'i i +Z.V Y E"pv {fir A hNLW 4.6N 6 5 I N w a N you. a YL d . �6 NG Nv Ot. CA &" _�u.ZZ.r eaeu y v N pp t O y0� + dV Cy Oi O� C .LIB 01 aN C 1 .mac$ :tea. u•`•o.. �. CN d •ud Ny. 9.lap a� N = id� E` �� Y� W� $ d u Y a �Y u` ¢+m. �o.�. u� �r 'Ce _ �WWW{Q C N D'd CL x. 'W ,V Nd YCyN its q�6a yY .'new0'-YO `6�' _C ` CC 9 L 4 CC Lv y 6L `� Y x &ob W .a v .r a u.. Y.O wN ta. O, ur 40L W2 d et 4- `G w/9 1' \ r _ c cl: 'TA, „ ��'" .o... Lac uo^ g Su` CC G o, c� .`� CN YO tlz y a� r + 7zme • 3 C r ^ _r E_ G f W N Y O l 'y 89 L Boa �E �i ce. CLU � u$�. � �` �. 'o•a! �e;' Y«L a�E +V Y�. O C R Y L � r O C♦w e m s r�. _ b♦4YQ l ,b♦<� L yYYC U '` Y. ON� U.y. =C. e v Cam. -+a. fr -2 d Y ^U� S • • r 9.� Ma w4.L� r• ^ M•ai U- L ^ U U p. N $..1 ... 1� yaLl'lQ CS•. 4w:8 U Ly S� +O•`N �=G LC +_ Y+Uw idU� 0E �U L r..4 C 9 w 0.d clC 'C ram& xy4y�� _L q�A ♦L.Uy C ` EY S r pY �.a.. ae Ca 2L w=_ UL� HN�+r r ♦CVL 6� `1 + YY r by Uu. r dV yj�.. LµUa ZOU. w C K a /9 CITY OF RANCHO CIYCAMONGa G�cnn1a r STAFF REPORT a � DATE: November 12, 1986 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Howard Fields, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: APPEAL OF SIGN PERMIT 86-46 - BANK OF AMERICA - Appeal of staff enia of a sign permit to add two additional Wall signs to the existing buildings, 'located at 9719 Foothill Boulevard I. ABSTRACT: The applicant submitted a ;,sign Permit, to place two dZU6o'nal wall signs on the Bank of America building. Staff denied this permit and the applicant has subsequently appealed this decision for further, ^onsideration by the Planning Commission, Staff is re.ommending :hat ),,the Commission deny this appeal and uphold staff's decisiol on the basis Shat the proposed Sign Program does not comply with the provisions of the Sign Ordinance. II. ANALYSIS: In reviewing the two proposed "Yersateller" signs for Bank of erica, staff informed the applicant that per the City of Rancho Cucamonga Sign Ordinance, commercial uses are permitted a maximum of three (3) signs for business identification. The Bank of America has two existing wall mounted signs, and also a single monument signs located at the Archibald ,Avenue/Foothill Boulevard intersection. Per the Sign Ordinance no other business identification signs are allowed. The Sign Ordinance* does contain provisions for both "convenience"- and "directional" signs. Convenience signs ccntain such words as "Restrooms" or "No Parking" for informational purposes only, while directional signs contain such words as '"Enter", "Exit", or "One Way" for the ,purpose of directing traffic. There are no limitations n terms of numbers and type for these signs, but convenience signs are designed. to he viewed on-site, while directional signs shall not contain any advertising o—"r Wrade name information. For both signs, maximum dimensions are limited to 4 square feet in area and 4 feet in height. The two proposed signs, as submitted, measure 16.6 square feet in area. Staff has denied this request for a Sign Permit based on the following Findings; ITEM,¢t PLANNING COh1MISSION STAFF REPORT Appeal of Sign Permit 86-46 - Bank of America November 12, 1986 ' Page 2 I. The sign requgst is in non-compliance wth the provisions of the Sign Ordiin�ihce limiting any Glass 1 buiiness (single tenant office build019) to a maximum of three (3) business identification signs,' 2. The sign request is in non-compliance with the provisions of the Sign Ordinance regarding Nconvenience" signs. The signs are not located with the intention of view only for on-site users, and do not meet the maximum size limitation of 4 square x. feet. 3. The sign request is in nck'"cLmpliance with the provisions of M the Sign Or i%'ance wegarding "directional" signs. The 'proposed signs do carry a trade rave contrary to the st1pulations of the Ordinance, and the sign are.\ is in excess of the maximum permitted dimension of 4 square feet. 4. In consideration of the colrrentiy existing. total. sign progr;'am for the entire site, i.e., business identification, convenience {t and directional, there are already over 20 signs in place, _ This is a tremendous number of signs for a single use busing:;s and the addition of two more signs would not be in keeping with the intent of the Sign Ordinance to provide a system of controls to minimize unnecessary clutter and to ensure a high quality visual environment. III. OPTIONS: The following options are provided for consideration by the P1 ing Commission: A. Deny the appeal and uphold staff decision to deny the sign permit. B. Direct the applicant and staff to work together to forriulate a revised Sign Program that still satisfies the needs of the applicant, but that is aise consistent with the provisions of the Sign Ordinance. IV. RECOWENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny the appeal hy nute Action. Res tfully itted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:NF:ns R-x t PLANNING G0[4tl1S on "'�lrF'REPORT �,pp�ai' of Sign vertu t 86-46 - Bank'of America November 14' 1985 .71 Page 3 I Attachments: Letter from Applicant Exhibit "A" - Lgcaton Neap �B' Exhi bit " " Site Map Exhibit "C" - Elevations of the Bank of America and Sign Locations 4 r 1 R-3 9 , MINA-'FREE SIGNS,ir' d�4 "� `l��°3 r" �-.L�s- P.'O.Box 840E STOCKTON,CALIFORNIA 95208 1233 East Ronald Street 95205 CATC 1 218 6 15 9 7 !y1 (209)941-2921 ATTENTION HOWARD FIELDS: TO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA M SIGN PROPOSAL FOR BANK OF PLANNING DIVISION AMERICA AT o719 FOOTHILL BL. P.O. BOX 807 --- RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91,730 GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached CI Uilider separate cover via _the following items: ❑ Shop drawings p'Prints LT Plans ❑ SamAles C Specifications ❑ Copy of letter Ct Change order ❑ CoFics DATE NO. - DESCR11MON 1 1597 SIGN PROPOSAL . ..�. C-n O' RApC•u, "odlNrn F_. UN OCT 6 7, 1$ 1 ti dA 6 Z. _ I THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: 13 For approval ❑ Approved as submitted O Resubmit_copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requestcd ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return carrectod points ❑ For review and ui mmant 0-1 ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN,fo US REMARKS DEAR HOWARD: THE BANK HAS DECIDED TO APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING STAFF TO REJECT OUR PROPOSAL FOR TWO i-SRSATELLER SIGNS AT THE BRANCH AT 9719 FOOTHILL BLVD. FOR THIS PURPOSE PEASE FIND ENCLOSED THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTALS OF 3 COPIES OF OUR PLANS, A PHOTO TO SHOW COLORS, THE COMPLETED SIGN APPLICATION, THE CHECK FOR $32.00. ALSO I AM ENCLOSING A CHECK FOR $62.00 FOR THE APPEAL FEE. WE FEEL THAT A GOOD CASE CAN BE MADE FOR THESE SIGNS AND WE ARE LOOKING FORWARD TO STATING OUR PGSITION TO THE COMMISSION. COPY TO — SIGNED: roMA24o.3 if muasurea,Sn l.s noted,kindly noNry ue at once. E0RGE HELLERICH J x [ �� -1, `--_..L' �--� °met ■ ■ 7 � -N•xr nx Rim i� L� ! 7. {[J� '1�Nf11tN�N�, Chi rF�+�IWYY�W Mp-. j. 4 t 1 • Fcc i HIL:L BOULEVARD-4 Q � Y -=1TE PLAN � N.T.S. II CITY OF ITLNI. s ,� RANCHO Ct,CANIONGA TITLE Sires r�G��t PLANNING DIVISION ExHiBrr• R-to ji I' ,I GT1W ar..r.; Ir~� • u�x?na ELEu�stcU '_� � ' TLI Rror�� ` { �.-• _ - At .r. FtOflt Of Bank 41 mER Cry • -, kJyST EL.EVATk,-ta . Yke !'n`r a .— ot .x _ IJAn"'�+aYYhl eslvo � I�we•cLnafC9.r:a+oln f . 3• KS1M pia A emu. f[U V CITY Or. TITLES - t8c/.a7%c.�l,S PLANNING DIVISION E.�HII3Ct +c+� ScALE, i R--7 y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: November 12, 1986 z TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission 1977, FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior G.i.bil Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Assistant civil ,7F)Igineer SUBJ rii, MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86-30 - `LOS ANGELES`'CELLULAR TELEPdONE CO Located on the -sou heart corner` of 9th Street. an Thdustrii.1 Lane - An'apoeal of a Condition of Approvalnequiring the nndergrounding of existing overhead utilities. I. ABSTRACT: The developer `i requesting that the Planning Commission Y ,.. deFtthe condition of approval requiring the un&rgrounding of existing overhead util`Zties along Industrial Lane and the payment of an in-lieu fee for or L71ialf the adopted amount for'the existing overhead utilities on the opposite (north) side of 9th Street. II. EACKGROUND: The project was conditionally approved by the City P an-1 ner on Octoberi47, '1986 (See EX, ibit "E"). The developer's letter of appeal of the Erigineeritg- Division's conditions is attached as Exhibit "8". The propoeed project consists of a or_-story concrete building (1311 X 33") with a 75 foot tall 'monopole, towar on a site 50' by 50' located on a larger parcel (approx. 577' x 2571) containing existing industrial buildings as sho*% on Exhibit "V'. III. IINALYSIS, Current Planning Commission poiicy requires that all U` aQ o ments underground existing overhead utilities fronting the project with the possibility of some reimbursement from future development acrovii the street and pay an In-lieu fee equivalent to one-half the adopted cost of undergrounding the existing overhead utilities on the opposite side of the street, unlerr specifically waived by the Planning Commission. In this case, reimbursement- for undergrounding the existing overhead vcilities on Industrial Lane is not probable because the prop@rty on the opposite -side is developed. The utility lines across 9th Street are not scheduled to be undergrounded and since 9th Street is designated as a local industrial street it will probably not be considered for undergroundinS of utilities with the use of City funds until after the undergrounding' c"', utiliVes has been completed on the Major Streets, f• s r ITEMS w .Y PLANNiNO COMMISS�4N STY i'F.,REPORT- MOR86-30-Los.Ang"eltes 4'� !ular Telephone Co November 12 1986 Page 2 -. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is, recormended that Planning Commission' consider a the input and: elements of this appeal ,and after ; consideration, the Planning Commission should take the appropriate action. $ Respectfully submitted, ;9arrye R. Hanson Senior Civil Engineer �l BRH:BK:cg r M i r J � Y fs Yt t a �.x *w s p •� .t -• {7 PF LOS ANGELES CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. cfrY°Rc�clvi @,D— PL4Nk O °u°AMorrGa of s:ON f October 29, 19a6 Am OCT 3 J � 4r1 bl Mr. Brad Buller City Planner , City of Rancho Cucamonga " 9320 Baseline Rd" h Suite C Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Subject:. Xinor Development Review 86-30 Dear Mr, Buller: I an in receipt of your letter dated October 27, 1$.86 regarding the findings and the conditions of the above referenced minor dsvelopment review. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone ^ampaityt (LACTC) -is in aq;eement <, with the conditions of approval ,as listed with the exception of engineering division, conditions"l and 2. It is LACTC's positio that, as a minor development,it should not bear the financia burden to correct existing or future problems of :ztili£ es of wY_1ch it has neither ownership, or control. +' Therefore LACTC herebyformally y requests :he right to apnea]: this condition to the planning commission as soon as possible. please confirm the hearing date. S'ncertCway ayne Communications Consultant Do/l ii I j 6045 Slauson Avenue,P.Q.Box 91-1003,Los Angeles.Cahfomia 90040 213n21-3939 M 5` UNISIOT ` f — ARROW RcvrE- — Par 1 t + e Por S#SAC i. a P`r d �i7r 9 i i ,day I• Ills 12, Par S •. M¢` � t,gsc 1 r cs:c c STwL Far[ SAID • \�\\�\ Par 2FERON .J.a 49) 4M Art AC e h d +� • o r. Pal i. .�. D, Z e`• Far)• Q — — - 3 V AC Pdr d •• -i + i CrTY OF ME MDR BID-3n RANCHO CUCAMONGA TT :PLOT may, ce S—S a _ :.. _ , a, .-3 ImX19r.cNE 9"Jfif WAANNtlU9E$�� Z ®: EXl9T,CGNC lIEXeNYYAn't, 17: Z+vY n ' AIr: N I I_eMr � Ke8 av,sr��i a wAKMWOU9M a J � , rFEFtpN 4 gbLVD. 9 CITY OF rrm. MOR 3 ENGUVEEMG DIV`7 I( N rl%. es _ ii i I9'•0°WHIP ANY4:Ai�N4 i ^--PION•Pi+�eFLECYI Vl6c i t�Ulii�J�D MOPZC?P06E E { o �j ALUMINUM TI IM-IMTBRIOK WSW i f� MCCR'C^t4cry a f AIR CDNDITk7PliPi6 I EXPOSED AeqwfiFGdITE ovafk A,L■Ih ropicsp PANELS"TYia. err - i I PIAnc�"K i --- c rA 1 'ir CITY OF Mm na RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' ma. P `r N E'NGINEG Do ITs M ® 3 a Electrical Line, a Electrical Lines\� M 1. Tele r Telephone es—"� { Industrial Lane Industrial Lane (Looking (Looking North) North) from Feron Electrical Lines Telephone Lines NINTH STREET at Industrial Lane (Looking East) CITY OF Wit: M OR RANCHO CUCAMIONG,A 'Trna- C* UT!L17 5 a ENGERMA- MG DIVIMON rr "n CITY OF RANCHO CUB 'F �+ xr.7Mroy King 1977 � CWas'I.Mgoxt Li Ion 15.M&*LJL'' Rieheni A4.LMp! P,mula I.�'s{Q! October 27, 1986 ' Mr. Dwayne Caraway Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co. 6045 Slauson Avenue Los Angeles, Californf4 90040 SUBJECT: ''MINOR DE1 W� NE dT PEVIEN 86-30 - LOS AIIGELES ttLLULAR TELEPHONE COMA#i`f Dear Mr. Caraway; The development review process for the above described pro,`­ k has been successfully completed and apprsyal has bm granted bay Fupon the following findings and conditions. -'hank you for your participation and cooperation during-this review procese. hie sincerello hope that this process has b.en positive experience for all involved. This decision shall be effectitie following a 10-day appeal period beginning with,the date of receipt of thss Letter. Findings A. That the proposed use is in accordance with the ob3ectiv€s of the Industrial Areas Specific Plan and the purpose of the zone in which the site is located. 8. That the proposed use together with the conditions applicable thereto wiII not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially in3uriou-_5 to properties or improvements is the vicinity. C. That the proposed use will Comply with each of the applicable revisiots of the zoning ordinance and Industrial Area Specific Plan. Conditions This project is approved subject to the following conffTTohs. Plann:! Division I. 'The wall mounted air conditionin units shall be screened from public view. �r'eening may be accomplished with solid masonry wa,ls, landscaping or at combination of both. Details shall be approved by tF-i Planning Division prior v) issuance of any construction permits. FIX nI is I 9320 WELINE ROAD,SUrM C* POST OFFICE BOX W7 • RANCHO CUCAMONI*A.CALWORNtA 91734 s{TEi)999-13S) � J_'•p!J Mr. Dwayne C&r.awa October-2T, 1986 d, MDR 86-30 Page 2 2. MA rtal used for the security fencing shall be either } #t wrought Jron or solid masonry Mgterirl, Details'shall be approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of any constructian permits. 3. Landscaping shall be"providod along the RYejec4 site boundary. A detailed lan0scape and irrigation plan indicating hew the planters will be "located in ` relation to the surrounding parting lot shall be app*ores prior to tssuancc of any construction perxi ts. 4. The project shall conform to al?_-_yequiroMts of the v Foothill fire bistrict, The applicant shall obtain 'sign-off" from. the Fire District prior to issu;rice of ry -any construction permits. 5. The applicant.shall obtain all necessary Permits from the 001diag & Safety Q!Visioh prior to construction. 6. This approval shall expire, unless''extended by 'the City Planner, if huil ding per are not issued. ; • within twenty-four (24) months from the approval,--date. Engineering Division: I. Ali existing overhead utilities ('telec=w:-;cations. and electrical) on the project side of InduW-41 Lane, shall be underpoundi , from the first pole sacth of the project bsundary.­�+,* the first pole north{,,f the project boundary 4 'ors M Street} prior to occupan^.v. 2. An ffi4ieu fee as contribution to ' the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecoMAications and electrical) on the opposite side of 9th Street shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one-half the adopted unit amunt timaes the length from the center of Industrial lane to the east project boundary (277 feet). Alk AM S-!0 October '27, MDR 8R-30 Page 3' - 3;. w ,.q If:you should have any further questions ploase contact me at (714) 9E9, � r> I86I: Sincerely, GOAl MITY DEVELOPMENT DEPRR'1'wmT PktAi;pF OIL Brad Buller city Planner s9:(:W:vC n ' k �y t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA c� a STAFF RtPORT ;e a , DATE: November 12, 1986 U > �. TO; Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission tsn FROM: 8arrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: POLICY FOR UNDERGROUNDING OF EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES POSSIBLE CE TIONS F _ I. BACKGROUND: ON October 22, 1986, the planning Commission directed staff to prepare guidelines for possible exceptions to the general' undergrounding policy for what might be considered minor projects. In particular, the exemption of the Minor Development Review category was discussed; For your reference, a copy of the current undergrounding policy ' nasolution is attached as Exhibit "A" and the definition of a Minor Development Review as Exhibit "W'. II. DISCUSSION: Arcju tnt for exceptions: s The cost Qf undergrounding or the payment of in-lieu fees could make the difference between a project being completed or not. In some cases, the work to be done wiil mearly improve the appearance of a project, and therefore be a general benefit to the Community. In fact, the improvement could be more e�hetically significant than the removal of overhead utilities Argument against exceptions: The proposed work may be the City's last opportunity to obtain fees or have the utilities undergrounded.The Commission directed staff to develop a procedure for determining whether or not a project should be exempt from the undergrounding policy. Three possible methods to be used are: 1, a variance procedure, 2. .a cost basis, and 3, `the establishment of a list of exempt project types. The standrrd variance process (Exhibit "C") requires the Commission tomake findings, therefore the applicant and staff would not know if the project was exempt until heard by the Commission, which Is riot much different from the current process. Also, the applicant would be rer�-red to pay an additional processing fee. ITEM T —_/ } PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT UNDERGROULNDING UTILITIES November 12, 1985 Page 2 The prra)lem with the cost basis method Was demonstrated at the last Pianning Commission Meeting where the applicant's improvement cost estimate ($12,000) was considerably lower than the amount determined by the building,permit valuation method ($30,609). This difference would lead to numerous disagreements between applicants and staff. Also, an arbitary cutoff ratio of the cost of improvements to the cost of the. undergrounding, (Z to 1, etc.) would need to be determined. t:1 The establishment of a list provides a specific criteria to both staff and the applicant; therefore, staff recommends this approach. The Commission did direct staff to specifically investigate exempting Minor Development Reviews from the policy. However, it was decided that it would be appropriate to also investigate other categories of projects that appear to warrant consideration;, therefore, establishing a comprehensive exemption policy �jt one time. A list of types of projects for consideration is contained on Exhibit "Da The types of projects that are classified as Minor Development Reviews are 4tontained within No. 1 and Z on the list. If the list approach is acd 'table and the content of the list :5 approved, the original policy wesolution No. 86-77 could be replaced � with a new eesolution ccritaining a section "7. Exceptions:" including the approved project list's III. 'RECOMENDATION: Staff r'ecommends that the Planning Commission consider the material provided and either approvr; the list of possible exempt projects (subject to modification), direct staff to explore other alternates- or maintain the current policy without specific exceptions. �� Respectfully submitted, Barrye R. Hanson Senior Civil Engincar BRH:cc Attachments 'j OY W J4lsz- C n- O fyi�ez a Yyr. L .w t6�uy0�YCy D Vu�t��� 2 Y� 2 0C 'pC Y y wQO C V�9 ytCG6 W 1Cp M TZ-41tt+4aYu� Nw ECp.3 Ii dVoO NMM LtLL. Z. pC`. �L py ;�"6+L X. C�LOO O S (t'�. GY Y VVV GG,Z �gTgX�y,SFw'� �� 'Y �t$�� SE Z C yn.� 2 N t1C 4OBliy Cm�r 3- 4 1 {ys. LLI ra P .».�tag -L ,L�r�,o tIT s JCNY1 �, N.YV OA tC y J6 IGy C Qa p O �C LQ ps urtC�� Ci0.� aY�Cryysp 14% L M �'a rC,>�.• Y V Y G i C.. y�L 9~p r _a 1 YZ Ole L> L,... .s.'y YY .. GySy V w Cp Y � P.y 4�►..�t' Vow ^�pp U uz !Yi —abs waits n'N N Jrwggm rC4 o a 50! l my��9�JJ 6Y' NM W�• w VYN r .� ppp ps V Gy`. Y.V=V�v`w y� .i WS�Q,{i,YCC.. Y �jOT•OCN N +F KY, 3C VO N�� ....•'Ys..w. pOUY yOQ�MYr� O �yyy 6>vipLpll C`VV b� VCr�M CYW 9 C��C � f 3t Y J 6 3�1p SM G IV +I aY. a °g Pb. fig �Ea .'• �S3 ` ° 9b 8 fr� 0� mg m of _� �m Q:5 a yo�A r ra Zt •bV. SU Sy '''~>» 03 :S T .5 8 beg `oW $+ 8a i8 �. Via- 6 t � 'oggi e5l f c s �. 's � E : pig a � •E o Vic .211 US 7 ..+ y 's K „� 9 'TSB.. v.�» 11 All a � h Pais 5 & Se UZcy 9 s .. c ° ... a. E y. oqr g;rR LF -k `5> a b P 8; ° �5. - LU as $ skim E � I.j � & �l s 9 g g pp z• sa Y Fa Fmk � 0 p ai n: d t I Pk ;oub-is .1W 11 A- M9. o`er 36jC=S 828 8 $ 3 s "4a �S� „bp. �E�sc E`3 q� aeP_" 9 �.. e E s o •q or o '.� �-1 3j � !1.'S y •�. 'E.'tl"E o� e�9 SEa�4. EkE' gr � •U m $ao S S�cT u UcE wp9.>'60 >oe mP � r= -noE.. 5tot, E:S$ r{$7R �Qoai 3 tot, a o 0 r- a! ;gig �q A � u � �drd� „q {"°� �� c g, $,3 qCpC °��,l�yy �N24• c �^,t.' �a9 cu otAG gg y< $ my ,as tj 21. Ef 8.4 $8�j` p o p •B y RI Ut .21 g3� $zgS,r� e-a� gal A ` E p� � $ o co» Tu 9 a e r �� w�� �• ' 8�a�i�"�' s853E�i�S� I Will fvjl�lj 3a EEC �E7y a ■�'$. y°Gg. a'a—� �Lg> 3 1o�r,S:-��b�a>� $.10 — A$ 8 FX �Pd}#as� t3�m�E M 9 y alit �� 4 age�C�� ... v� �7��.. $�� �• �g!`4 p# >` has41 Qa whi V a 4g = a k<_ t Exe Rt Pcroiect List = r° 1 The addition of functional equipment to existing developments, such as. 1 ading docks, silos* satellite dishs, antennas, water tanks, air c(nditioners, cooling towO s, enclosure of an outdoor storage area,tOarking and loading areas, block walli and fences, etc. 2. Builidng additions or new free standing buildings of;.bss than ? % of t1i poor area of the existU4 building�s�, or ? squareTeet, whichever is less. NOTE* Possible for blanks 25% and 5,000 square feet versus 50% and 10 000 square feet per Minor'TA-ve-lopment Review. 3. x€xteN r upgrading or repair of existing developments, such as.'.= reroofing, addition of -trellis, awnings, landscaping, equipment screening, repainting and exterior finishes, etc. 4. Interior tenant improvements. 5.. Non-construction CUPs. A. The construction of a single family residence on an existing parcel. 7. The Design Review for previously approved single family residential subdivisions. �F. 8. Residential subdivisions of four-or less parcels. 9. Those parcels of a subdivision which are developed atkd all adjacent public street improvements are existing to City Standards. 10. Time extensions for previously approved projects E. { I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA r�STAFFMo G STP REPORT i o > DATE: November 12, 1986 tsrr TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner SUBJECT: STATUS OF MINIMUM UNIT SIZE/MINIMUM LOT SIZE STUDY On October 8, 106, the Planning Commission heard tl�e a presentation by Jack Lam Director of Community Development, n i i G i y D opment, o_ mi mwn lot sizes for single-family detached and zero-lot-line housing r.,d minimum dwelling unit sizes for single-family and multiple-family bsing. The Planning Commission selected a Subcommittee to work with staff on the preparation of a tentati program and schedule for addressing these issues. Commissioners Larry �icNiel an_d Peter Tolstoy were appoiiiteo to this Subcommittee. The Subcommittee met with staff on October 29, 1986 to consider this matter. The Subcommittee has recommended that this report be brought to the Planning Commission for the purpose of establishing'a Workshop date to consider development of a recommendation on the proposed changes. It is felt by the Subcommittee that a Workshop setting would provide a better opportunity for thoroughreview and analysis off, this imp,)rtant matter, It is recccommended that the Workshop date be set for December 4, 1986 ir.uediately following. the Design Review Committee meeting. Input received from the Commission at the 'Workshop will be compiled by staff as code changes and/or policy statements to address this matter. A Public P-wring would then be set to consider the proposed changes. This Hearing could occur at the first or second Planning Commission meeting in January. After successful completion of this schedule, it Is hoped that the matter will be brought before the City Council sometime in February. It is also ;loped that the Market Study will be completed before this I matter is` heard by the City Council. Staff has prepared a Request for Proposal for the Market Study which was mailed out to marketing consultants the first week in Novem'er. It is tentatively scheduled that the contract for teervices and the scope of services provided:'L_!ll be presented to the City Council for approval at the City 'CounZ 's first meeting in December. ITEM U �PLfNrNG ` N �SSTQt�, tAFF REPORT r, Stags rf Mfini.mun 4n Size/Minimum Lot Size Study Novemberl ,,i•9g6' Page. 2 y 0, _ The purpose .of the PFl,anaing Commission Workshop will be to discuss the problems and concerns associated with small lot subdivisions and >. dwell i ng -.unit sizes and select appropriate, gaeasu`v es to rwiol ve these concerns. It is hoped that at the-end of the Workshop, the Commissiion ' will have provided",stiff with adequate direction on minimal lot sizes and minima dwell'iaq u-nit sizes, and srelated Development :standards; to be'incorporate into code cages and policy statements. t In addition, the ss 'of garagaa versus carports will also be included 'u in.,the d1[=-;,4;sion at the Workshop. ' It is anticipated that the BT.A and. Total develo�iers witl desire to Make~ a presentation at the Wor%shop. Staff will prepare a report to the Planning Commission. for the Workdop that provides a general overview analysis-of th'r, backgro Qd and facts- concerning this iss,a At the reco0mendation: / the Subc4sittee, the" report will include fact, on the number of acre of developable land in the Low-Medium Residential category. that would be affected by these ':proposed changes, and what effect th•i :)roposed changes would have on the i Planned Cowz tnities. In addition, . ;Ae report will outline where the , City stands`; n relation to Government requirements for provision for affordable hWsin.g. al,: a In conVI;uSion,\'the Subcommittee recoa •ends that the Planning Commission set a mate for`?•a Workshop, and dir- : stdff on any further information to be included i<s staff',-report foi',che Workshop. r Iles tfully �^ tted,, B ter :. City Planner BB:DCtns k -