Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1987/01/14 - Agenda Packet
r.. 't %ACK, p Ci'TY OF w d• i 1 C j s'L'i/1g1�Nigw�10r;�CG�a. 1�0/1''`1���it�l?,��+pj,p S.cgaN LNG i ?p, WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 341 1987 7:00 p.m. r LIONS PARK COMdVIRTY CENTER , ;.. 9161 BAS1's LIME.. RANCHO CUC;AMONGA,CALIFORNIA e+ L Pledge of AlWance b. IL Sw&,rigg is of Bnm Emerick as Plan Comm Wow by CitytClerk Saverly Autbelet v 1IL RCU can Commissioner Bark-:.,p Commiss4oner MaNiel Commissioner Chits: Commissioner Tolstoy %i Commissioner Eme-1.4 IV. Aaxnwernents V. Approval of Mina6;,s August i3,1986 x 4t. November 12,198( December 710,1986 VL Consent Calendar The following Consent Cttendar items are expected to be routh a and lion-controversia€. They will w•,; acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. .If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discut siQv4 Ii A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT;I EVIEW 86-38 BARTON The development of seven multi-tenant industrial buildings totaling 103,854 square feet in the General 1 Industrial District(Subarea '`)located on the north side of Jersey : BoulevRrd, approximately 350 feet east of Utica Avenue - APN ! 209-1�2-19,20,2 j B. ITeSIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 13060 - THE .MCCARTHY �L'IX ANY Reyiew of site plan and building architecture for Tracy 060, an approved residential subdivision of 19,5 acres Within the Victoria Planned Community (Low Residential 2-4 &ellivg units per acre) into 86 lots, Located at the southwest M corner of MilVien Avenue and Fairmont Lane -API.` 202-211-13, 38. 1 .. �. 43 �VIL Pubiie itemi. i Tiie folloWfng'itertis are public headw- Which concerned individuals may,, wash tiieil4 opiniit8 Of,the related proluct. Pleas Wait to be re gnizifd by the,CWMCM a I&addrdSS the Commission by ata dig �. y r na1M0,,and�addresa. Alt such opinions shall be limited to ii minutett Per indi,%dd&(for c"acf;.'prrro ect. C. E J MBN ALAS HSSMENT AND PARCEL MAP Nv,[ if►239 - �C AM NGA CO N Y WAT R LS RICT A. lion a 49 ecres o bland te, parcabs in tne,Flood"FJoQd Co designatiot} 1 ,. Locate l ,on"fie t�ortia"vest corner of Foothill Boulevard and ' Diego:=Avenue: APN MA01�-43. (Continued from Deuerober :;9'86 meeting.) JrJ:` ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY'AM NDM Wr 8 i 2 &a .-8R1� PROPER A request to emend-, the Terra vista Planned I Community by establishing a Business Park Ovaluy Zone for areas ddsinated as Of floe IPark, Commercial and Mired ,Use,: within the ;Planned Community baundary APN 1077421-06,. 1077-091-17. (Continued from December 101986 meeting.)' E" CONDrnONAL USE PERMIT'`6-26 - CITATION -A request-to establish an Off-Site model homes sales office complex on Lots il- 15 of Tract 12238 located at the northeast comer of Church , Street and Whitney Court for the purpose,of' lots,sales within „« Tract 12830, 1pfeated on the west side of Beryl street,, north of"' `ravine Street APN 208-073-11, 12 13, 14,and 15. .V"ontinued from December 10,19?%meeting.) F. VARIANCE 86-07-MOBERG A request to reduce,the number of perking spaces req ed or a food establishment fa a developed shopping center in the Neighborhood Commerciai'`District(NC) located at the northeast corner of Archibald and Base Line--APN 22-731 12. (Continued from December id,1990 meeting.) G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL . PLA14 AMENDM NT $6-03A-1,AR7G IiOMES KAUFER -A request to amend the Lend Use Element of the General Plan from Flood Control to Low Medium Density Residential(4-8 dwelling units per acre) for 40 acres of land located at the southwest corner of extensions of Banyan and Milliken APN 201-271-55. (Continued from November 12,1986 meeting.) 0NVIRO'Nr4zNTAL ASSESSMENT ANIt GENERAL PLAN '41MEND41ENT 86-03D -, CITY OF RA7JOHO'C0C KOkTGA A requests to amend the Land Use Element o the General Pl€vr from Lox+ itileaiurri 'Aenslty Residential (4-8 du/ac) to Low'Density Residential.(2-4,du/ae)_end/or 'Very Low,Density Residential(less than 2`dujac)for 68 acres of land located at the southwest corner of Nilson(if exiep4ed)and Milliken(it extended)-APN `111�191 11,17 (Continued from Saptgmber 24,1986 meeting. ENIIRQNMENTA L ASSBSSNIENT. AND DEYEL01'MENT �)ISTRICT ` A IENI3MoENT'' 86=05 CITI'; OF s'_RANCHO ,l t3UCAM:CINGA r rA request to:Amend the Jevelotim nt D�strxet Map ira'm "FC! (Flood Canty-ol) and '+1M" (LoTv I�Ieclium Density ResideWal - Z-4 du/ac) for-68 xacres of land located at the southwest corner of Wilson,(i£extendedl and Milliken(if- ,extended) -APN 201 192 11,17. ) _ EI L ENVIRONMENTAL;ASSESSMENT AW-) PARCEL; MAP 10351 - ?` BILK.3GOTT;INC. -A subdivision of 1.12 acres Of landarid into twotwo 2 poodis within.the '4Very how (2 dujRc) Development District, located,on the south side of Ironmounta n Court,west of Hermosa Avenue-APN 201-071-26. J. CONLDITLCNAL USE PERMIT 86-32 Oft APPROVAL 97-66) - J ' PATTON r The equest to add- -a--ondition of appzoval to existing a, aping= enter located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue r.nd 19th Street-,APN 202-171-46, 51 through 56. K. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 8fi-01 MAGIC uAMP INN - The review of providing live entertainment in conjunction ietion with a • restaurant use,located at 8189 Foothill Boulevard. N " L. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 12577-C.P.LANGE �•,, 7-9--custom lot residential subdivision of 16 lots on 4.24 acres of land in the Low Density I(esidential District (2-4 du/aca,located on the south side of 19th Street,west of Hellman-APN 202-041- 03 and 52. M. MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL. 'dSE PERMIT 85--09 - MOUNTAIN VIEW COMMUNITY CHURCH-A modification to a previously approved Conditional Use Permit to allow a church within arj existing preschool facility within the Terra Vista, Planned Community on 0;,1 acres of.land in the Medium Density Residential District(4-14 du/ae)located on the northeast corner of haven and Valencia-APN 201-221-11. x I N.' TIME EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84-21 - ALTA LOMA CHRISTiAN CHURCH A request to convert an rixisting IM8 square foot single family residence to an'.�ffice 1'pr tlbe Alta Loma ChOstian Church on.25 acres of land in Ithe Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) locateA "s on the west side of Sapphire,across from Orange-APN 1062-332= '23. O. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOFUE14T CODE AMENDMENT'86-03 -: CITY OF RANT UHO CUCAMONG.A'- The r, { request to amend the parking section 17.12.030.,A-12 of the Development Code,pertaining to harking lot striping standards. V1UL ;s I ew Business ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW y Al k 86=36 GENERAL DYNAMICS - The development of Phase ff construction of an.approved Master Plan on 75 acres of land. Phase I"consisting of a 380,000 square foot industrial/warehouse building .i the General;Industrial District(Subarea 11)located on the south side of 6th Street between Utica and Cleveland-,4PN 210-081-8,9,10. .` Q. HOME- OCCUPATION PE7lMIT 86-210 - TAYLOR Appeal of Staffs 'decision denying i Home Occupation Permit at 8159 Malachite Avenue. IS. mectorrs Report€ SPECIFIC P - F R. HUNTER'S RIDGE ECIrIC LAN. CITY 4F TANA - i G oN r 4 Planning Commission review of land use alternatives for,the Hunters Rido Specific Plan on 567.6 acrer�of land with the City of Fontana, located on the north side of Summit Avenue,Last of San Sevaine Creek,west of Devore Freeway. J S. CONCEPTUAL DESIGN FOR THE NORTII: TOWN a' I' NEIGHBOR'. OD PARK SITE ! T. PLANNING DIVISION WORKPROGRAM-Oral Report X. Commission Business XI. Public Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. XM Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopted.Administrd-Ove Regulations that set an 11 p.m. adjournment time., If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. I, Janice Reynolds, Planning Commissfort,Sec;atary of the City ofRancho Cucamonga, ` hereby ce-tify that a true and accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted seventy- two(72)hovers prior to the meeting per A.B.2674 at 9320-C Base Line Road. l 1 (1 � M _ ' 1 VICINITY,MAP i rt R t.' BPHLlIE-!!R Iti61��IRNCL: � Hit L81011 DAWYAN cc aea�'t0 eves rs eases— ar � Qt�Y�IR =R� R°61tA1`�, ✓¢• N s a ttS ND e :C ,� a e s VIC?DRIA .r/ u, AS- LINE • ue i r • r g GH G}a �a..e e....�� alt.ER 4 .,1 e � F s oo NIRR � e � ®➢ C ARR VI �•x g i • �a� O -_-__ -• Tth w ccw aetas ------- OC m W 4te v uu W SAN R®IN 'FREEW Y CITY OF 7' a t CITY OF RAN HO CUCAMiONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting ` November 12 1986 h 4 Y Chairman Denni.s Stout called the Regular .Meeting of the City of. Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission,to order -at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was held at Lions Park Community Center, 9161: Base Line Road., Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman Stout, then led in;t�e pledge of allegiance. ROLL CALL_ COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: E. David Darker, Suzanne Chitiea, Larry McNiel, Dennis Stgat, Peter Tolstoy ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Brad Buller, City Planner; Dan Coleman, Senior Planner; Bryce Cook, .Associate Planner; Howard Fields, Assistant Planner; Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer; Ralph Hanson, Depazy City Attorney; Barbara Krall, Assistant Civil Engineer; Debra Meier, Assistant Planner; Scott Vourphy, Assistant Planner; Joe Stofa, Associate Civil Engineer Janice Reynolds, Planning Commission Secretary; Chris Westman, Assistant Planner; Alan Barren, Associate Planner ELECTION OF OFFICERS Motion: Moved by Commissioner Stout, seconded by Commissioner Chitiea, unanimously ,carried, to appoint E. David Barker Chairman of the Planning Commission. Motion: Moved by Commissioner Stout, seconded by Commissioner Barker,_ unanimously carried, to appoint Larry McNiel Vice-Chairman or the Planning Commission. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by. Stout, unanimously carried, to approve the Minutes of September 24, 1986 as presented. Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Stout, unanimously carried, to approve the Minutes of October 22, 1986 as presented. y CONSENT CALENDAR A. T''1E EXTENSION POR PAFICEI 14AP 8486 - TMY A division of 34.2 acre;; of land into parcels n ate inaustrial, Pa-rr Distrdct'(Subarea 6) cocatexl on the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Arrow Route - APN 209-092-04. ^ B. TIME EXTENSION FOR CONOITIOliAL USE PERMIT :84-37 KELBERT PARTNERSHIP' - eve opt�ren o a ,. square footgasoline spensing s�i1 oT n and { ancillary automptive facilfties on '2.5 acres of land located`, at the northeast corner of Center Avenue and Foothill Boulevard in the General Commercial (GC) District - APN`1077-401-28. C. DESIGN REVIEW POI TRACT 13059 w REPUBLIC DEVELOPMENT - Review of site plan an building, arc tec ure for Tract 14059, an approved residential Ij subdivision of 25.8 acres within the Victoria Planned Community (Low- Medium Residential, 4-8 dwelling units pe,., acre) into 137 -lots, located k is north of the Southern Pacific Railroad and east of the Deer Creek Channel APN 202-211-13, 38. Brad Buller, City Planner, requested that Item C be removed for discussion. Motion; Moved by McNiel, seconded by Chitiea, unanimously carried, to adopt items A and-B of the consent calea;ar. C. DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 13059 - REPUBL' DEVELOPMENT Bruce . Cook, Associate Planner, presented a revised Resolution for the Commission's consideration. The amendment included an additional condition providing adequate access to the railroad slope maintenance area to the south of the tract. Roger Wilton, representing the applicant, concurred with the amendment. Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by McNiel, unanimously carried, to adopt item C of the consent calendar. PUBLIC HEARING5 D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86-03A•,- LAING HOMES request amend the Land Use Element of ve enera anteroom flood Control to Low Medium Density Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for 40 acres of land located at the southwest corner of the extensions of Banyan and, Milliken - APN 201-271-55. (Continued from September 24, 1986) Planning Commission Minutes -2- November 12, 1986 i i I Otto Kroutil, Senior,Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman Stout openedthe public hearing. ,t Jess Harris, representing the applicant, proposed a ,plan to the Commission ; . which would combine the subject parcel and the parcel to the south with a total number of dwelling units not =to exceed 320 units; which wau'Sd be less -than what is'permitted under the current zoning with the separate*_reels. He requested that the subject parcel be zoned LM with a condition that the entire parcel will not exceed 320 units. He advised that the reason for the; request of LM is because K&8 would like to build a similar product that/they have on the north side of the parkway on 'Caryn development and the LM zoning is need in this case to achieve that type of product and that type of densi;,y. Brad Bullir, City Planner, responded that any action taken by, the Commission ' tonight could not be conditioned in such a way to restrict or control any A other development on any other property. This land use decision before the Commission tonight-cannot be conditioned; therefore, intent of,the applicant would have to occur as a package plan of some type at a later, date in order C� for the Commission to be assured that this proposal would actually happen. He pointed out that if the Commission takes action on the`northern parcel, there is nothing to restrict the-property on the south from coming into, its. full r development potential of 8-14 units per acre. He suggested that the item be �. , continued with direction to staff to work with the applicant in preparation of a project proposa' that would include both sites, 1 Mr. Harri;l asked for a preliminary reading from the Commission o;r the concept presented in terms of the site laymit, and asked if it would be possible to submit a conceptual proposal. Chairman Barker indicated that there was precedence which would allow the 1 submittal of a conceptual package. I There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. 1 Commissioner Chitiea stated that the last time this item appeared before the j Commission there was considerable discussion as to whether this particular piece might go from low medium to low �d the property ,below even be considered being lowered to low medium, and felt this needed to be j discussed. She was in favor of lowering the density on the property below as well as this site; but indicated that she would be willing to consider a master plan concept to-the entire site. Commissioner McNiel agreed and indicated that there were also discussions as to the consideration of lowering the density to the northwest as well. He advised that the Previous discussions to lower the density in the entire area should be under,,tod by the applicant. If they wish to continue with a master plan knowing full well what our posture has been, he would not object to that. { Planning Commission Minutes -3- November 12, 1986 i 4 L.' } _ x Commissioner Stout statep, that thel af°�gas ill 'or i htl +as less, than 5 on per acre. He would not avor the on n re u t tf 11enon the number of units; however, would concur with the applicant`s request to s H. submit a conceptual package combining the two sites. Commissioner Tolstoy supported the master plan concept. He concurred with the continuance as proposed by`the applicant with a tofial cap of.320 units-,over ; the total of both parcels. er. Chairman Barker stated that he would like to see.,what could be done with a ' master p3an, but at the same time would prefer to see the density lowered. He asked if the applicant had the preliminary reading he needed., ;s Jess Harris, representing the applicant, concurr., , with the Commission's direction to come back with a preliminary concept after the first of the year and propose something, in the neighborhood of 4.75 overall density on the ;• site. He understood that Commissioners Chi2iea and kfcNiei would prefdF to lower the density in the area; however, felt he could come in at the Low and Low,Medium range or very close to the upper range of those dear ities. , Commissioner Tolstoy cautioned that the applicant may have grading problems to take into consioeration on the site and suggesteC that the 1g*1 grading the better. Notion: Moved by tkNiel, seconded by Tolstoy, unanimously' icarried, to continue the public hearing for Environmental 'Assessment and 6neral Plan Amendment 86-03A to the Planning Coimnission meting of January:14,1987. E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT _e n, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 86-15 - .te estab f 's mran o a mo or ome us assembly business within an existing 168,000 squam,foot industrial ,.buii'ding and the 83,000 square foot expansion of theexisting building on A.8 acres of land in the General 'Industrial/Rail Served District (Subarea 2), 'located at the southeast corner of Arrow Highway and Vineyard Avenue -;APN 209-12- 15. (Continued from October 8, 1936). DEVELOPMENT REVIEW '86-13 - MODIFICATION - MESSENGER -' The reque;;t to modify the previously approve s er Plan y re uc ng the site area of Prase III from 4.4 acres to 2.L acres in the GeneralIndustrial/Rail Served District (Subarea 2). located at the northeast corner of 9th Street and Vineyard Avenue APN 209-012-16. (Continuel from October 8, 1986). Chairman Barker advised that the applicant for this item had requested a continuance of the public hearing to December 10, 1986. He then opened the public hearing. There were no comments. Planning Commission Minutes -4- November ,.2, 1986 Motion: Moved Gy MrP i.eL] isecanded y Stout nanidnc�uslaY ja►�k ied to continue :1 the public hearing cis Div ronmentaibA,sessnfen° an on it gal, Me Permit 86- 15 and Development R,eviey 6-13, Modification : .the Planning Commission meeting of December 10, 1g�.I �- F. TERRA VISTA PLANNED C; NITY AMENDMENT 86-02 - WESTERN PROPERTIES - A request o amen a errs Vista a anne oar�un y y es sT2ing a business park 'overlay zone for areas designated as Office Park Commercial and Mixed Use, within the Planned,Community boundary - APN 1077-42146, 1077-09�-17. (Continued from October 8, 1986). Chairman Barker, announced that the applicant for :Ms item had requested a continuance of the public hearing., He then opened tte'public hearing. There t. were no cow"nts. Motion: Moved by Chitiear seconded 'by McR&ie], unanimously carried, to continue the public hearing for Terra Vista Planned Community Amendment 86-02 to the Planning Commission meeting of December 10, 1986. ' AL ASSESSMENT AND CONKTIONA USE PERITG. ENVIRONMENT. �o.nproposa o locatea square foot, unmannedremote s Ags4 ' north of Highland and east of Mil;iken�within the Caryn Planned Community - APN 225-1417fig. (Continued from October 22, 1986). Chris Westman, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman Barker opened the public bearing. Paul Rsgiano, r?presenting the applicant, concurred with the conditions of approval. He advised that the probleic of the deed restriction had been resolved. of t ' GommissiCommissionertRcTdie] asked if evidence hle deed restriction had been submitted to the. City. Mr. Ragiano advised that documents had been sent to Mr. uiIorio approximately three weeks ago and to date he has not voiced an opposition to the project. There were no further cas—vants, therefore the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Tolstoy asked how the freeway offramp issue was resolved. i I Planning Commission Minutes -5- November 12, 1986 k 0" Paul,Roageau, City Traffic Engineer;�avi.spd=cn t ;Caltrins was considering a different configuration ,for the offra due to ,the existing housing. He further advised that the ultimate eleva�ion of fr�eewarv 'right-of-way would be `° approximately 20 feel:higher than the existing ground. Commissioner Tolstoy was concerned with how th %switching station design would fit in with the church owned property since i�has not yet been designed. Brad Butler, City Pla ner, advised t&tAtaff added a condition to he Resolution to insure ,;fiat the architecturi�`�and landscaping of the switching station would be re-evaluated at the jive\%a project, is proposed on the property to the north and west of'the swi ching�,station. Commissioner Chitiea was concerned that the church zite plan and architecture would have to be designed around the switchinig station Mr. Buller pointed out that staff was attempting to accomplish tip apposite in that th.' primary architecture of the larger site would take prec&-nnce and the architecture of the switching station might halve to change. Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Stout, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the Resolution approving Cinditional Use Permit 86-17. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS MCNIEL, STOUT, BARKER, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE carried H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE 86-05 - WALTON CONSTRUrTION - A request o decrease the m n mum average lot size, the minimum O-Fwidth, the minimum corner lot width, and minimum lot depth for a proposed 57 lot subdivision in the Very Low Density Residential District (less than two dwelling units per acre) located on the west sale of Sapphire Street, south of Jennet Street :- APN 1043-121-01, 02, 03; 1062-011-02,03; 106a- 161-01. ENVIROk4ENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 10349 - WALTON CONSTRUCTION - total al a en a ve opmen o single am 7"y lots on . "acres the Very L�* Density Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the west side of Sapphire Street;, south of Jennet Street - APH 1062-161-01; 1062-011-02, 03; 1043-121-01, 02, 03. Scott Murphy, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner Tolstoy asked that attention be made as to how hater is going to get from the property through the block wall to the drainage,' ystem provided. Planning Commission Minutes -6- Nevember 12, 1986 4 j Brad Buller, City Planner,, .tdviaed that staff will make a special note to the Plan checker for this proJkct to :rake this concern is noted. Commissioner'stout stated that he was on the Ad Hoc Committee for the approved Plan and noted there was an additional :north-south equestrian trail along the south bank of houses th?t basically separated the NO developments. He pointed out that this trail appears to have been deleted and asked if there was any discussion of this issue. Mr. Murphy advised that there had beer. no discussion of this at the trails committee meeting. Commissioner Chitiea stated that she had been unab!e to attend the Traits Committee meeting when this tract: was reviewed and questioned how the trail was deleted. Mr. Murphy replied that it may have been an oversight in that there was no intention to purposely delete the trail. He advised that in going through previous meeting minutes he could not find where the trail was actually renuired. Commissioner Chitiea stated that the slope of the be of some concern and asked the Engineering Department o�lokite �atcitcould closely to make sure it functions as it should to eliminate the possibility of a muddy trail and standing water. Mr. Murphy advised beat the Resolution conditioned this project to go back to the Grading Committee to finalize all time details prior t`;o the issuance of building permits. i Commissioner Chitiea suggested that the Trails Committee work with the Technical Review Committee to make sure the drainage and the curbing is safe and appropriate. Commissioner Stout asked if there was discussion relative to the detailing of walls on Sapphire, and the suggestion of placing a portion of the fence along the top of the slope for the lot on the south side of Thoroughbred. Mr. MurPke advised that there was some discussion of this issue and that the applicant was opposed to that idea sincev he felt it would be more aesthetically p2kyasing to install additional landscaping as a buffer. Further, the Desigr Review Committee agreed that landscaping would be more appropriate, Chairman Barker opened the public hearing. Guy Williams, 2011 E. Financial flay, Glendora, California, representing the applicant, gave an overview of the project. tie requested that Planning Aivis°=on condition 8 requiring a J.5 foot commuity trail along the northerly Planning Commission Minutes -7- November 12, 1986 WIT tract perimeter be deletedd. a dvised that Jhe eadsements to the east and west are for utility an vehVcu ar access n y an are rot dedicated for equestrian use and that these Lots are not suited for 'equestrian use. Ask Additionally, he requested condition 9 a & b and condition 12 be 4el.eted as internal -weeder trails because these -parcels are not ideally suited for equestrian use. He asked for the elimination of the easements along the east, west, and"north sides of thf�development, and elimination of:lthe feeder trails that exist on the westerlyy~ExAirm of the property, the internal line and the far western 'Line on the east side of the development. He requested that "inhere appt��able" be added to Planning Condition 13 requirirg-the tract to be graded to provide a. minimum 15 root Level area on the lot adjacent to the local feeder trails.. He addressed Engineering conditio:', l b relative' to undergrounding utilities along Sapphire street and .requested that the one'-half of in lieu fee contributed by the developer be ;returned proportionately to the homeowners in the event the City does not begin Uodergrounding,of utilities it this location within a five year period.. He requested 1 c to underground utilities within the equestrian trail north of lots 33-35, 40,-42 and 47 be deleted and stated that this condition places .undue burden on the developer and ultimately the homeowner. He requested that Engineering condition '2 regc,ring sideweiks to be constructed be deleted. He requested condition 4 a requiring a 2 foot hiyn block wall for drainage; protection along the easterly edge of the driveway on lot 13 and westerly edge of the driveway on loin 12 be deleted and advised that these 'cots have been elevated to be 2 feet above the curb height. He requested clarification or deletion that the inter' ;°lder trail easements not be dedicated. Chairman Barker pointed out that this development is within the Equestrian Overlay District; therefore, the Code requires that every lot have equestrian access. Brad Buller, City Planner, advised that this was correct. He stated that it the Commission does not feel comfortable with the trails issue, he would recommend that this matter and any modifications be referred back to the Trails Com itttee. i Mr. Williams stated that he was trying to provide a better development where ` there is a mixed use and to provide some arras for equestrian use and other areas which do not conceivably lend themselves to equestrian related uses, He advised that another consideration is the proximity that some of these lots will have to the stables; the house and the location of the stables would fall within the 70 foot range of some of the neighbors dwellings. Commissioner Stout asked how the applicant would protect the lot on the south side of Thoroughbred from visual intrusion from Sapphire. Clyde Anderson, Landscape Architect, advised that on that particular lot would be heavily landscaped. Further, if the ultimate homecatner decides they need additional privacy they could submit a decorative wall design to the architectural committee for its approval. This committee would then recommend approval and forward the design to the City of its approval. He advised that Planning Commission Minutes -8- Novwber 12, 1986 f� any archtec ural ch n es ld bre revfired thro r t CC g'�s to be presented ,.. to the archftectura omm ee prioro submitta oehe tY for approval. ` immissioner Stout asked the participants of the architectural committee. Mr. Anderson r.dvised that the committee would be comprised of himself, the chief executive officer of the organization, and at a later time homeowners f. would be asked to participate. Commissioner Stout asked if the applicant,would continue to participate in the, committtte until all lots are sold. Mr. Anderson advised that they would continue participation for a period of two years or'finger until a committee of hweowners was developed to take over }` that responsibility, Sharon Romero, adjacent propwrty owner, reques�.}ed that adjacent howowners he notified of date of grading for the equestrian trail. Her concern was that the trees and berm have been maintained there for a specific reason and suggested that when it is graded instead of smooth change the grade be kept abrupt on the northern part of property to retain a visual wall appearance. She agreed:with.,,the applicant that sidewalks are a negative factor. Jim Anderson,='Thoroughbred resident, supported the applicant's request to ` delete sidewalks and the north-south equestrian trails. He supported the project. Theo Bello, Sapphire Street resident, stated a concern with traffic impacts as a result of this development. There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Chitiea stated that the only aspect that needs to be seen by the Trails Committee might be the actual drainage incorporated into train. She believed the trail omission was an oversight because it was included in the original discussions. Further, that it is the intention of the Committee to make all the circulation as complete as possible. Commissioner McNiel stated that the applicant's recommendations with respect to deletion of trails should also be reviewed by the Trails Cc mittee. Commissioner Stout stated that in order to approve the applicant's request to delete the trail easements, the Commission would have to adopt findings for a Variance, which he could not see the grounds for approval. Further, a number of tracts similar to this throughout the City have had such cot.Jitiors placed on them and whether people chose to have horses or not is not the issue; the Ordinance requires trail access. He agreed with Commissioner Tolstoy that the Engineering Department should take a look at the drainage with respect to what it does to the surface. He didn't see the necessity to widen the Sappbire trail to community standards, when all the other trails along there are not of I, Planning Commission Minutes -9- November-32, 1986 a I that standard, A Commissioner folsFtoy agree?-Ind stated that all lots should have trail access whether the homeowner has horses or not ,4',rle concurred that the oversight trail should goback to the Trails Committee; but didn't think the om?ssion of trails was ,an open-issue. Commissioner Chitiea suggested that the issue of width of, the trail along Sapphire also be�refer'red to the Trails Committee. Shi) was ;totally opposed to ), the deletion of trails aQj felt it was important to maintain the rural atw'mphere of the City. Jim Anderson again ,addressed the Conemission an;�>advised that the original north-south trail was proposed due to the incompatibility;;.,itween the previously proposed tract and the existing Gary Miller holies. fte stated that he would not like to see that trail_ required of this 'tract. Comaissioner,.8ar;er,stated that it seems 'to be the consensus that the north- south trail should be referred back to the Trails Comittee, .along;with an inquiry concerning the logic behind the extra width on the :sapphire portion of the trail. He asked for discussion of endergraunding of lines within the equestrian trail Commissioner,'McNiel stated that he was of the opinion that the City has ;stabl shed a policy to undergror,tid whenever possible-, howevei4, concurred with -the deletion within the eq iestrtA grail under,circumst ances ex0ained by F stafr. Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer, 'asked for discussion regarding the applicant's request with request to the in-lieu fee for undergrounding along g Sapphire in.which he requested a time limit of 5 years and if fees not spent within that time money would La refu,.__:L He advised that this would b? contrary .so current policy in that time limits have ncz been set in the past. He felt it would be optimistic to think that the lines would be underg.:,un�q-,,tthin 5 years. r Commissioner Stout stated that he could see no reascn to place a time limit on this tract when it has not-been done for,;any of the others. He concurred with thy'applicant's request to delete the crndition requiring sidewalks. Commissioner Tolstoy concurred. Commissioner Chitiea stated t,5at she woul't3 concur with the sidewalk deletion, however, under different circumstances believer!, that sidewalks along one sde of the street would be appropriate. Commissioner 14cNiel stated that he'believes sidewa",ks should be required, Planning Commis,ion Minutes -10- November 19, 1986 Chairman Barker asmed for discussion relative to the ats it=s request to : delete the requiresnent for a two foof� height block trail yor d►atnalit protection. Barrye;Hanson advised that he`�would be :reluctant to delete the condition at this point in time since the condition says as otherwise approved by the City Engineer: He stated that staff would take a close look at the ,d!?ainige and if staff,lat',rmined that the applicant's proposed solution is reasonable, they wou`Id'approve the proposal. Chairman Barker stated that he Ould like the City Att`.orney's office to make sure that the formation of the architectural reviLV comittet is contained within the pro3ect's CUR's.,, Co•nnissioner Chitiea was concerned that there was no provisions for the City to enforce trail maintenance. Mr. Buller advised that the Condssion could requt,a the CC&Rs to indicate i that there is a ''niz rntt .ae,,,_jevet for the trails. Commissioner Tolstoy.\stated that private drainagEi systems in tracts should also be included"in the CC&Rs and should state in s a. ,,.fashion tilat'on-site private drain systems are required to be kept open and ara not, places to stump debris and to let grass grow. Ralph Hanson suggested that these conditions`could. be added' to Standard Condition R-14 to reflect a checkmar and delete the ,articles of Incnr'poration of a Homeowners' Association and adding the maintenance level' for trails and Frivate'drainage systems, and the architectural review committee.. Commissioner Stout suited that he didn't 'have a lot of-:falth in architectural committees. With respect',,;to frontage trn'Sapphire, he felt Lott I and 37 should have CC&Rs that provide that if there are any changes or m6difications in *,",i wails that front on sapphire, that the City has the right t,) review thv Mr. vn a&ised' than a copy of the tract's proposed,,CC&Rs have been submi to tFa City for their review and that the City is made a pant of the review process for changes on all lots. _. Barrye Hansvn addressee,the applicant's request for clarification of Standard Condition L-1 requIring dedication of feeder trail easements, He advised that the City does not accept feeder trails as City dedicated,, but they should be dedicated Ts private easements to the people in the tract. Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by Stout, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the Resolution approving Environmental Assestment arw,_Tentative Tract 13049, with amendments to include deletion of Engineer{ng rcto'-ftions 1c and 2 relative to utility undergrounding within the equestrian' trail and Aft Planning Cowimission Minutes -11- November 12, 1986 IIi i sidewalks, respective y;, Loth"1 n 51 sha7ti not ailte�^ 11a7 i on Sapphite without City, approval, nort -sout�i local tra 7 requ re a ong the western property line,,of Lots 14 and,15,,,CC&R's to inc'"I< e a maintenance l�eve7 for trails and private drainage easements, as well �5.refcreace to tSte formation of an architectural review committee, and the trait width along Sapphire to be referred to -the Trails Committee. It was the consensus that the oversight trail would be required, and the applicant would work with City staff, if lot -line adJustmenrs were necessary. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: WMISS; ;HERS CHITIEA, 'smO r_, BARKER, 'WHIEL, TOLSTOY 10'7% COMMISSIONERS: NONE iwd-_AT: COMMISSIONERS NONE carried 211 Mahon.- Moved by Tolstoy, seconded b�C; , el, to `ssue a Negative Declaration --d adopt the ResvIuMon apprc;4ing EnvironMental Assesiment .and Variance 85- W. Motion carried by the foll't,wing vote: AYES: Cott lsslo.Iw TOLSTOY, W.NIELt BARKER, CHITIEA, SYOUT NOES:. CtIWSSIOMRS: NONE I ASSENT; CiiSSTOtlERs: NONE rarried C- 9:05 p.m. - Planning Commission Recessed 9:15 p.m. Planning Commission Reconvened T. ENVIRONMEWAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13318 - CORDOM , ,A custom lot subdivision or parses an acres o al nd-IF e Low Density Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), -located at the southeast corner of Hermosa ;Avenue and Manzarita Drive - APN 201-181.28. Scott f-ttrphy, Assistant Planner,_presented the staff report. Chairman Barker opened the public hearing, Kim Gordon, applicant, concurred with the findings of the Aesoluelon and Conditions of Approval. There were ra further comments, therefore the public. hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Stort, seconded by McNiel, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt; the Resolution approving Environmental Assessment and Tentative Tract 13318. Motion :irrfed by the follow:"g vote: Planning Commission Minutes -12- November 12, 1986 h AYES: COMMISSIONERS STOUT, MCNIEL, BARKER, CHITIEA, TOLSTOY (VOWS: COWISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMISSIONERS: NONE -carried i J. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 86-12 - WESTERN SERVICES COMPANY - The es a s men o an -automobile leasing office n an exist nag building, with a lease space of .3750 square feet'' on- 1.66 'acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 4) located at 9375 Archibald - APR 210-071-47. Debra Maier, Assistant'Planner presented the staff report. Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney, advised that the Planning Commission did not have the ccnsent� f the property owner, for this request to continue, therefore, the Commission's actions should be to deny the Conditional Use Permit without udice. Motion: Movc-d by McNiel, seconded by Chitiea, to deny Conditional Use Permit 86-12 wif lout a,°rejudice. Motion carried by the following vote AY,FS: COMISSIONERS MCNIEL,='CHIiIEA, BARKER, :TOUT, TOLSTOY ! NOES: COV'iMISSIONERS NONE ABSENT: COWSSIONERS NONE carried, ' K. TIME EXTENSION FOR AND MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84-34 - Itif? C proposal o ro e e—store frontfacade, R& i�na an scapi-Nq in the parking area, reconstruction of drive approaches, a minor building addition, and a conceptual buildinn,, pad for a proposed, drive-through-fast food restaurant in an existing kifighborhood Commercial shopping .center on approximately 7.8 acre.1 in the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District located at the northeast pbrner of Carnelian and Base Line - APR 202-381-24, '26, 28, 33, and 36. Debra Wer, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman Barker opened the public hearing. Garth Sherrif, representing the applica,t, concurred with the findings of the Resolution and Conditions of Approval. Planning Com+oission Minutes -13 November 12, 1986 t h ' Mott'on: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Stout, to approve the T�"`sae Extensions d ` Modification to Conditional Use Permit 84-34. Motion carried° the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS MCNIEL, STOUT, BARKER, CHITIEA, TOLSTOY 4 NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSI6kRS: NONE -carried r, f L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 10185 _ HILLIf LYOH COMPANY -'A subdivision of o. acres of land,,into 2 parcels7ln the V,c,or a Planned Cn munity located' at the southwest corner of Hi-ghland Avenue/antl-Milliken Avenue - APR 202-211-13, (+ Joe Stofa, Associate Civil Engineer, presented the staff report. He- advised that Condition E-2 of the Standard Conditions had been checked in' error and << requested that it be removed. Chairman Barker opened the public hearing. Steven Ford, representing the applicant, concurred with the findings of the Resolution and Conditions of Approval'. ;> k There were no further' comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Chitiea, 'seconded McNiel, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the Resolution approving Environmental Assessment and Parcel Map 10185 with the removal of Condition E-2 of the Standard Conditions. Motion carried by the following vote- AYES: COMMISSIONERS CHITIEA, MCNIEL, BARKER, STOUT, TOLSTOY NOES. COP tISSIvi+ERS: QRE ABSENT; COMMISSiOOERS: NONE carried M. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 10237 BARTON - A subdivision of acres or landinto 14 parcels in e e enera ndustrial District, Subac-ea 8, loc?�;ed between Arrow Route and Jersey Boulevard, between Utica Avenue and Vincent Avenue - APR 209-142-15, 14, 34. Joe Stofa, Associate Civil Engineer, presented the staff report. Chairman Barker opened the public hearing, Planning Commission Minutes -14 November 12, 106 40 ,pit. .,1Ji ,14 Dale Frisby, representing'; the applicaiit,t concurred with the Resolut�,on and Conditions of Approval cif There were no further �o'#ts therefore the public hearing was cla fir, Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, iecogded'by��tl el, unanimously carried, to issue.a Negative Declaration ands, adapt tFid' Resolution approving Environmental r ^ ; Assessment and Fa ^el ^Aaap 10?37.",Notion carried by the fallowing vote:: x, AYES: C01 ISSION7�S TOLSTOY, MCNIEL, BARKER, CHITIEA, STOUT TOES: COJMISSIO( RS NONE ' ABSENT, C"ISSItSHERS: NONE -carried A. Commissioner ;McNiel pointed out to the applicant that the conditions of approval for ,the Master Plan for this project includes undergrounding of utilities on Arrow,Route. He' stated that since the applicant had filed an appeal of this condition on a recently approved adjacent parcel map to the City Council, the applicant might, consider combining the appeals into one package;. N. MODIFICATION TO'CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 80-02 - BROWN - The development of a Z8,515 square fo-of retai F,shopping— `comer on 2-racres of land in the General Commercial District located at the 'northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Lion Street - AoN 208-632-48. Debra Meier, Assistant Planner, piresented the staff report. a, Chairman Barker opened the public 'hearing. Pete Pitassi, representing the applicant, concurred with the findings of the Resolution and Conditions of,Approval. Tnere were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. *tion: Moved by Stout, seconded bye;;cNiel, to adopt the Resolutii-hi approving" the Modification to ,Conditional Use Permit 80-02. Motion carried by the ''oilowing vote: OES: COMMISSIONERS STOUT, MCNIE1., CHITIEA, BARKER, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: MORE ABSE°�T: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried AMk Planning Commission Minutes -15- November 12, 1986 0. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 86-07 " - A request_ to amen a eve opmen , s r c map.from .1;.- 00„ ontrol) to "GC" (General Commercial) for 1.06 acres of land 'located on the northwest corner of Fcotlifll Boulevard �^1 and San Diego Avenue� (A portion of APR 207-101-43). Alar"!!arren, Associate PT:,inner, presented the staff report, Commissioner Stout asked if tha realignment of San Diego Avenue was,considered at this point in the process.. Mr. Warren advised:that the realignment had _mat been consiQ1^ed with this application; however, was an issue being considered as part eV-the Foothill Specific Plan. _ Chairman Barker opened the public hearing:. Jim Cline, representing Cucamonga Co4ntv�Water District, concurred with the findings of the Resolution and Conditioni•,,of approval' „ There were no further comments, therefore tie public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by Mcgiel, to recommend issuance of a Negative Dec,>1'ration and adoption of the Resolution recommending approval to the Cit Council. Motion carried b the foliovafn vote- AYES: Y g ' AYES: COMMISSIONERS CHITIEA, MCNIEL, BARKER, STOUT, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS• NONE ' ABSENT. COMMISSIONERS: NONE`' car0,k: d It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that the Foothill Boulevard Ad Hoc Committee consider the realignment of San Diego Avenue as 'part of the . study. P. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 10223 - ARICAL PROPERTIES, INC..division o acres into 2 parcels within ino Industrial Park District, Subarea 6, located at the nortneast corner of 6th Street and Haven Avenue APM 209-411-15. Barbara Krall,,Assistant_Civil Engineer, presented the staff report. Chairman Barker opened the public hearing. Planning Commission Minutes -16- November 12, 1986 t Jeff Meyer, representing he a�p icint, re�tstded that the language within EngineeriYns( Conditions an a ciar a and was concerned that the specifics. ,gngth incicded both'"parcels. He additionally asked for 1 clarific._ r.,, with regard to the Reimbursement Agreement for existing overhead utilities. There were no farther comments; therefore the r lic 44ring was closed. Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer, suggested that the word "fee" within condition 2 A. could be changed is "fees" and the reference to -L.e specific number of feet could be eliminated to address fir. Heyer's concerns. With regard to the Reimbursement Agreement, Mr. Hanson advised he would meet with ^the applicant to address any concerns. '.'Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by Chitiea, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the Resolution with an amendment to Engineering Condit1on"2 A. to change "fee" to "fees" and the reference to the specific numher of feet u stricken. Motion carried by the following vote; {'. AYES: COMMISSIONERS STOUT, CHITIEA, BARKER, MCNIEL, .STOUT NOES; COMMISSIONERS: HOME ABSEN€:. COMMISSIONERS: NONE ('-carried t NEW BUSINESS Q. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ,AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86-22 - KAPLAN - The eve (i n of a 38,8M square foot 'i ndustri al buing on 2.1 acrc:3 of land+;'the General Industrial;District (Subarea 13) located on the east 3 side of 6th Street north of Buffalo Avenue - APH 229-261-13. Debre, Meier, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman Barker invited public comment. Lindy Kaplan, applicant, concurred with the findings of the Resolution and � Conditions of Approval. Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by Chitiea, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the Resolution approving Environmental Assessment and Development Review 86-22. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS STOUT, CHITIEA, BARKER, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY HOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried Planning Commission Minutes -17 November 12, 1986 R. APPEAL OF SIGN PERMIT 86-46 BANK OF AMERICA - Appeal of staff denial of a'31gn Permit to add,2 Wa signs ta _ci-exrs ing building located at 9719 Foothill Boulevard. Howard Fields, Assistant Planner, presented the staff r"ort. u. Chairman Barker invited ,publ c,,comment. Chris Gales, representing the applicant, gave an overview of the request. There were no further public comments. Commissioner Chitiea stated:` hat this sign would be advertising and there was sufficient indication that the structure is a bank and the Verseteller is clearly seen from Foothill; therefore, would dot support the requL�.t. Commissioner Tolstoy stat tfthat he would,41t oe in favor of additional signs, Commissioner McNiei stated, that this was the first time he could recall an appeal cooing before the Commission on t�1e number of signs allowed and �`. questioned how the number of signs was determined, He further stated that' e could not support this request. F �r Brad Buller, City Planner, advised that the; number of signs is at the ' discretion of staff. He stated that staff and applicants normally reach ayv- agreement, however, this particular applicant felt that his request shoul&,6e allowed. Mr. Buller pointed out that the signs requested do not meet the criteria for directional signs in the Sign Ordinance. Commissioner Stout stated this City has determined that signs will identify projects so that it is easy to find them and are not meant to advertise products. He felt this project has adequate 'signage and it would not be imposing. a hardship to deny the addition of two signs. lie did not support the request. Chairman Barker stated that the two proposed signs are totally out `of compliance with the Signs Ordinance. Motion Moved by Chitiea, seconded by Stout, to deny the appeal. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS CHITIEA, STOUT, BARKER, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE carried ,t Planning Commission Minutes -18 November 12, 1986 ... ..fir a S. APPEA;, OF MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86-30 - LOS ANGELES CELLULAR TELEPHONE LoUted at the southeast corner of-9tn—_,Str—eetand' 1ndUStr1a1 Lane. _ An appeal of a condition of approval requiring undergrounding of existing overhead utilities. Barbara Krall, Assistant Civil Engineer, presented the staff report. Chairman Barker invited public comment, Ron Moreyo.represent qg the applicant, advised that the appeal was based on an objection to the in-lieu 'fee for future undergrounding of existing overhead r utilities. He advised that this facility,only takes up 6% of the site and ' felt that the condition wis an undue hardship. 'there were no further pubflc comments- -Notion: Moved by Stout, secs ded by Chitiea, to approve 'the appeal to delete the conditions requiring 4�4'1✓lieu fee for future undergrounding of existing overhead utilities. fttiL.n,carried by tits following vote: AYES; COMMIS$IONEP,,S it STOUT, CHITIEA,.BARKER, MCNIEL; TOLSTOY' r NOES: COMNISSIONEO, ; MONE Am ABSENT; COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried DIRECTOR'S REPORTS T. UNDERGROUNDING UTXITIES REPORT Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer, presented the staff report. The Commission considered the list of poss4ie exceptions and determined that Items 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 6, and 11 should be retained, with the inclusion of the 26% and 5,000 square foot option for item 2. The Commission concurred that Design ReAview for previously approved single family residential, subdivision. residential subdivisions of four or fewer single family residential parcels where utility lines extend at least 600 feet offsite from the project boundary and adjacent property, and parcels of a subdivision which are developed and all adjacent public street 1mprovelrtt:,rcare existingto City Standards, Items 7, 9, and 10, respectively, should be deleted from the exemption list. The Commission felt that the intent of Item 8. was not clear and should be reworded. Additionaliy, a committee comprised of -Commissioner MNiel, Mr. Hanson and Mr.. Buller was appointed to further study the undergrounding policy and to return to the Commission with further recommendations. ANIL Planning Commission Minutes -19 November 12, 1986 3 1 k. U. STATUS OE MINIMUM UNIT SIZEMINIMUM LOT SIZE STUDY l•� Dan Coleman,-Senior Planner, presented the staff report. Mr. Coleman advised that the Commission would adjourn, this meeting to a wrorksbn to be held on December 4, 1986 for further discussion ofl•`this item. The report was receive# and filed: COMMISS O I N BUSINESS The following Committee appaintmgn� were made: Residential/Institutional Design Review Committee: Coamissio'e- Barker and Tolstoy, 411 c, i Office/Commercial Desigu Review Committee- -Commissioners McNieV4nd Chitiea Trails Advisory Committee: �J Commissioner Chitiea; Commissioner Tolstoy, llZ'UersiateJ ADJOURNMENT Motion:. Moved by HOW, s��onded, by Chitiea, to acv6urn The Planning Commission adjourned to a workshop to discuss Minimum,,Lot/Unit Sizes. The workshop is to be held on December 4, 1986 at ,lthe Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center, 9791 Arrow, Rancho Cucamonga, following the Design Review Committee meeting. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller Deputy Secretriry Planning Commission Minutes -20- November 12, 1986 Pr ;.i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting; August- 13, 1986 Chairman Dennis. Stout called' 'the Regular Meeting of -the City of Rancho Cucamonga Flannj g Cortmission to order'at 1:00 ;.o." The meeting was held at Lions Park God tintt* tenter, 91,61 , ase One Road, 'Raney b Cu Callornia. Chairman Stout ;then led in the pledge of allegiance. ra ROLL CALL" COMMISSIONERS: PeseNT: David'-Barker, Suzanne Chitiea, Larry McNi.el, Herman Rempel, Dennis Stout ABSENT, None STAFF PRESENT: Brad Buller, City Planner, Dart Coleman, Senior Planner, ` Bruce Cook, Associate .Planner;. Nancy. Fong, Associate Planner; Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer; Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney; Barbara 'Krall,"Assistant Awl Civil Engineer, Otto Kroutil Senior Planner, Piing Putri;no, Assistant Planner; Janice Reynolds, Secretary; Lisa Wininger, Assistant Planner a APPROVAL OF MINUTES i Motion: Moved by Chitie'a, seconded by-Barker,. carried, to appove the Minutes of June 11, 19�46, Commissioner McNiel was absent f;3m that meeting; therefore,- abstained from vote. Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by McNicl, unanimously carried, to approve the Minutes of July 9, 1%6, with an amendment by Commissioner Chitiea to page 4 to clarify'her stato4nt. i i 'T z CONSENT CALEMAR �^ g A. RESOLUTION OF DENIAL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RE'11,E1f -54 -7 KiOA13RU 1- :he development of a 9, 9 square foot to ust -,a uT, ng ` ors-°a tt 4& repair`/maintenance service business an 3;5 ac #s of lala�tin the General Industrial District (Subarea 8) located at''thelnorth tix of Whi'ttram, 600 feet weG ,;& Pecan Avenue - APN 269-211-40.. B. tf,!(Id REVIEW FOR TRACT 9225 NILL1kILL.IAMS,'- A review of building io ieva ,`ons _or s n9le family etac i:)mes within an existing °N-0/o ial subdivision at 69 lots on 15 acres in the Low Residential Ci., trict lopated on the northwest corner of Highland and Carnelian APN st ,/ ���;�F2-52'1-03 through ?1. y ' t �. ,`,AAL TIME EXTENSION;FOR•' TENTATIVE TRACT 10.088 - FRI:EDMMAN HOMES - A ;,isidential su -v siorr-o acres into 131 s4ngle family lots. n the ,ery Low ,,Residential District (1-1 du/ac) generally located .at t;-_ northeast scorner of Archibald and, Carrari Street'- APN 201-071-14, 37, and 45. Chairman Stout requested removal of Item B for discussion. l Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Barker, unanimously carried, to adopt t Items A and C. of the Consent Calendar. ` B. DESIGN REVIE4 FOR TRACT 8225 HILL/WILLI'AMi Chairman I*out was concerned with the perimeter .gall treatment on Carnelian and felt the conditions of apprayal were vague. He requested clarification 1 that the intent f� that the perimeter walls are to be tan stucco, consistent' with the existing walls along Carnelian Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by Barker, unanimously carried, to adopt Item B of the Consent Calendar with direction to the City 'Planner that at time of submYttai of detailed plard-, the perimeter walls along Carnelian are to be of tan stucco, consistent with the existing walls. PUBLIC HEARINGSr D. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84-09 - AMENDMENT - LDS CHURCH - Tie request to amend the approvea ConditionalUse Permit allowing the installation of four 35-foot high and two 50-foot high light fixtures for the: northerly softball and soccer' fields located at 6829 Etiwanda Avenue, north of Victoria Street - APN 227-06-65 and 23. (Continued from July 23, 1986 meeting Nancy Fong, ,Associate Plattner, presented the staff report. Planning Commission Minutes. -2 August 13, 1986., 'I, Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Dave Long, representing the applicant, gave an overview of the project and the lighting issuess. Mr. Lono. suggested that, based upon the lighting report, a sound b',anket could be used to mitigate the noise level. He Udicated that he. had contacted Etiwanda School District and had reached an agreement that the noise level of the public address system would either be reduced or eliminated. He advised that he had no problem with not Ostalling a public address sound system for use at these fields. Commissioner Chitiea asked if the hours Gould be rearranged so that games were not being played late in the evening. Mr,�Long replied that playoff games are generally played during the months of July and wst be scheduled after working hours to accommodate the particip&its. He indicated that the gamas.begin after working hours, but sometimes are required to go into overtime. He further stated that limit*$ng the evening hours to Fridays would conf*i:»t with current church programs and requested that the sports program be alld+:xd 6a Thursday evenings. Beth Davidson, 13018 Larvera Avenue,, Etiwanda, stated concerns with t:Na Ilse of the public address system. She urged that the Commission .insure the surrounding neighbors that the noise level would be mitigated. There were no further comments, therefore the;.public hearing was closed. Commissioner Barker stated that if the blo'ek wall was engineered for 6 feet and the two feet could not ba added, he would concur that the sound blanket would bit satisfactory; however, felt that the sound blanket should be approved by the City Planner. He was not in favor of inhibiting the programs to only the weekends and was satisfied with the evening hours as long as they did not go particularly late. tie supported the applicant's request to allow the sports program to occur on Thursday evenings. He asked for discussion on the length of iiie. Commissioner McNiel supported increasing length of time to 10:00 p.m. for evening games. He stated that it is almost impossible for games to end before that time during playoffs. Commissioner Chitiea objected to IOsOtl p.m. during school months. Commissioner Rempel agreed that during the winter months 10:00 p.m. was too late. Mr. Long, indicated that he would not object to 141miting the hours to 9:00 p.m. during the winter months. Planning Commission Minutes -3- August 13, 1986 �C 1 1 W Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded -by' McNie1, to a dopt the Resolution approving Conditional Usp Permit 6 -09 with modif-cations ;o include limiting a the sports program to Thursday. and Satyrday,,evenir►gs; sound blanket required to the satisfaction of the City P1aEaner; and gamed to end at 9:00 during E win}er months, 10:00,4uring summer months. Motion carried', the foi7awing vote; AYES: COMMISSIONERS BARKER, MCNIEL, CHITIEA, REMPEL, STOUT NOES, " COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT -' COWISSIONERS: NONE carried E. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT i35-3+F\- TARGET STORES The establishment of a temporary office trailer aso an ancillary use, to an existing warehouse, facility on 6.4 acres' of land within the GenerZ�'-' `industrial/Rail Servt:,..- L (Subarea 10) District, located on the east side �� ._rjfi,t carg Avenue, between Newport Drive and 7th Strrje�- APN 229-26-46, - Dino Putrino, Assistant Planner, presented the stuff report. Chairman Stout opened the public heii ing. There were no comments,,therefore, the public hearire was closed. Chairman Stoat stated that he f�id not s!tppo,t this request and felt that the trailer should be removed. H6 did not see the',.'lied for a temporary office trailer to house only three people. He pointed oUf that the City has spent a 4 lot of time with its industrial area in an effort to make it an area everyone is proud af- He did'not consider this Vequest consisftent with requirements for the industrial araa.. Comnissioaier Chit ea was concerned with location of the trailer as it encroached into the drive area. She concurred with Chaim Stout- that approval of ;this request would not be consistent with the Cit; a requirements for the inds strial avea; therefore, would not be in favor of the Conditional Use Permit. _ Jff Commissioner McNiel stated that he supported the request. y J Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Rempel, to adopt ttaa Resolution approving Conditional Use Permit 85-36. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES COMMISSIONERS MCNIEL, REMPEL, BARKER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA,'STOUT ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE carried Planning Commission Minutes �� -4 August 13, 1986 f a F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 126714- LEWIS HOMES The tots eve opment of_a residentiai Subdivision :oft 1. acte4 in the Low Medium ,Residential District (4-8 du/ac,) within t6he- Terra Vista Planned x Cegmunity into 151 lots, located' on the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue,and Terra 'Vista Parkway., APN'1077-D91-29, In addition, applicant has requested a Tree Removal Permit to remove the existing windrow to accarnodate the Milliken Avenue alignment.: ;. Bruce Cook, Associate Planner., presen.edJthe staff report. Mr. Gook indicated that condition 12 of the .Resolution was missing then: end of the sentence and should read "subject to review and approval by the City Planner" " Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. John Melcher, representing Lewis Homes, concurred with the f idi'ngs of the <; Resolution and Conditions of `.-Apuroval, -With respect to the landscape treatment at the end of the stiaei:,i to provide an open view into she interior of the cul-de-sac, Mr. Melchor informed "the Coittnissian that the. current; residents of those streets had appeoavh2 d Lewis Homes wits a request that tt streets be closed off. He indicated that Lewis Homes would formally appro' the City with that request at a later time. y There were no further comments, therefore the"aublic hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by Barker, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the Resolution approving Environmental Assessment and Tentative Tract 12671, with the modification to Planning condition la to complete the sentence to read "sub3sct to review and approval by the City Planner". Motion { carried by the following vote: j y AYES: COMMISSIONERS HITIEA, BARKER, MCNIEL, REMPEL, STOUT' ` NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried Chairman Stout announced that the following items were related and would be heard concurrently by the Commission: G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 9504 DICKER-WARMINGTON - A diviisi�on cf res into' parcels within t e Neigh orhood Commercial District of the Terra Vista Platined Community, located at the:northeast corner of Base Line Road and Haven Avenue - APN 202-801-25, 26 (Related P),oject: CUP 86-05) Planning Commizsion Minutes -5- August 13, lg86 y H. ENVIRONMENTAL 'ASSESSMENT AND 00RUiTIONAL USE PERMIT 86-05 -° DICKER ' WARM IN s�ON' = he eve;opment of an integrate s ©piling oanter of appra fig1y. 1365734 square feet which includes six (6) 'satellite ' buildings il, 're nine satellite building is a one drive-in facility on acres of "{,and;in the Neighborhood Cowercial, District of the Terra Vista Planned Co. an iy, located at the northeast corner of Baas Line Road' and r Haven Avenue, -APK 202-801-25, 26. (Related project: Part 9504) 011 Bar{era Kra11, Associate Civil Engineer, presented the Parcel Map staff report. Nanly Fong, Associate Planner,; presented the Conditional Use Permit staff s report. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Jerry Dicker, representing the applicant, gave.an overview of the project. He concurred with the findings of the Resol t a :and-Conditions cif Approval. Chairman Stout stated that the-, City harp 4erienced problems with shopping centers making changes to the building'..,.. .Atecture and. after a ' period of time. He asked if Mr. Dicker would object:/`t'o a L?ndition of e approval prohibiting theses types of 'changes without prior approVhl by the t City. )r '. Mr. Dicker indicated that !:`e would not object to this condition anivas aware of the situation which exists with Kragen Auto. He stated `chat his company is currently working with Kragen to see that the situation is resolved. AML There wf�re;no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Chairman Stout stated that the project_design had come a long way since the project was first submitted. He was concerned with architectural or landscaping changes and stated that a condition should be placed on the Resolution that the site is to be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved development plans. ` r Commissioner Chitied was concerned with the treatment of wails, and stated that all free standing walls and fenc, should have decorative treatment; such as stucco, which would be consistent with the exterior building'materials. Barrye Hanson; t;�e Senior Civil Engineer, advised that the parking ement had been addressed in the Parcel Map resolution; however, had not been included in the resolution for the Conditional Use Permit. He suggested' that the. Comraission consider adding the condition to. assure that on-site circulation and enforcement was, adequately addressed in the CC&Rs. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Chitfea, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the Resolution approving Environmental Assessment and Parcel Map 9504. Motion carried by the following vote: i l Planning Commission Minutes -6- August 13, 1985 I El GHITIEA+ .BARKER, MCNIEL, STOUT µ` AYES: COM47S5YONERS o REMP , k COMMISSIONERS: NONE NOES: carried COMMISSIONERS: NONE ' ABSENT; to issue a Negative Declaration seconded by McNiel, Motion: Moved by Barker, Environmental Assessment and Conditional and adopt the Resolution approving Ce with approved dOelopment Use Permit 86-05, with amendments to include conditions to require that the site be developed and maintained inWilding l di gVe decrials, and a provision in ans' freestanding:walls and fences r= to haVE decorative treatment, such as pl en�orcement. stucco, consistent with the.-? the GC&Rs far oh-Site circulation°and parking 8:30 p.m. - Planning Commission,'Recess,0 8:40 p.m• - Planning Commission Reconvened r * * INCORPORATED, - PARCEL. MAP 10007 arceRsCw�t in 't a eneral I; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND o an into L P + Highway" A iv�siu�} of located on the nar�h side=of Arrow 9 Industrial A:ea (Subz�'ea 8), east of Maple'Avenue - APN 208-351-?.2•re.ent�ed t<p staff report. Barbara Krall, Assistant Civil Engineer, p r Chairman scout opened the public hearing• the applicant, stated an an se ated, that the phil Addington, representing„ utility undergrounding condition of approval requiring cost of this condition 'would be e011Ous• He requested that the be deleted. u�1ic hearing was closed. therefore the p' There were no further comments, policy for utility. Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer, advised that the the applicant is being der rounding states that utilities ar ar q�ular dca$eoundedalf or tithe -cost lieu f of un 9 obtained toe iindicated that in this p Highway required a an in-lieu fee equivalent to one h undergounding on the south side of Arrow and el stated that the policy must be maintained consistently Commissioner Re deletion of the condition unless the policy is,changed. could not support -7- August 13,' 1$86 Planning Commission Minutes u u 773 .i Commissioner McNiel st4ted that the undergrounding policy had been established „ by the Commission in an effort to upgrade the City. The only way to achieve undergrounding at thft point: is to require new development to begin, the task �u? d1d not support:-the request to delete the cgndition. .. Commiss'loner Chi Vt ea�t!tated that in reaiiiy, the undergrounding condition results in-a hatf-4lip to almost every applicant; however, felt that the policy must be maintair'; cgn`sistently. Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Chitiea, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the Hesolut-Ton approving Environmental Assessment and Parcel' Map 1000% Motion carried"by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS, MCNIEL,, CHITIEA, BARKER REMPEL, STOUT 4` NOES: COM' ISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: C014MISSIONERS: 'NONE -carried Chairman Stout announced that thefollowing itegs were related and would be heard concurrently by tie Planning-Commission: J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 86-01 - BROCK DEVELO ENT - APevelopment District Amenament from ce ro essiona to LowMed-ium Resr'.:46tial (4-8 du/ac) for 3.67 acres of land, located at the northwest corr!r of Archibald Avenue and 19th Street -,APN 202-1091-21. K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13353 - BROCK DEVELOPMENT e total development of acre-Di acreff—Dir landin the Me ium esi"ential District (8-14 du0ac) into a 2, lot residential subdivision for the development of a 64 unit multi-family condominium complex, located on the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 19th Street - APN 202-1091-21. Howard Fields, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. _ Gary Mitchell, representing the applicant, gave an,3vErview of the project. There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Rempel was concerned with the location of the driveway and was in favor of getting the driveways away from the open space. He was concerned with the open space provided within the project and felt it was inadequate. Commissioner Chitiea supported the concept of open space in the center of the project. Planning Cortmission Minutes -8- August 13, 1986 gft Chairman Stout was concerned that the iandscap%ng. and Irrigation 1of the ., . portion of the street which would be vacated as a result of the realignment of Archibald. He suggested that a lien agreement be, required . to `,a sure maintenance. >T' Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by Barker,/co reconmena� issuance',of a _ Negativa Dee-iration and adoption of the Reso'Aion approving Environointal Assessment and Development District Amendmenh F.6-01 to the 'City Council. Motion carried by the following vote: �_- AYES: COMMISSIONERS `"CHITIEA, BARKER, MCNIEL, REMPEL, STOUT ". NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMI,SSIONERS:, NONE carried Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Chitiea, to isswe a Negative Declaration and adapt the Resolution approving Environmental Assessment and Tentative{ Tract 133531, with a requirement for a lien agreement for landscaping and irri.gtion of the portion of the street vacated as a result of the Archibald realignment. Motion carried by the following vo.e: AYES: COiMISSIONERS BARKER, CHITIEA, MCNTEL, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONEiS: REMPEL ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 40ME carried Commissioner Rempel stated his no vote was due to the location of the driveways and felt they were hazardous.: Chairman Stout advised that the following items were related and would be heard conWrrently by the Commission.'' L. DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMEND MkT 85-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the e ve opment stric Map from "Low" -4 du ad) to Low Medium (4'-8 du/ac.) ,far 13.5 acres of land, located on the south side of Feron, east of,Archib+sld Avenue APN 209-085-02, 03, 14. U. NORTH TOWN PARK DENSi:T,Y 'BONUS AGREEMENT Lisa Wininger, Assistant Planner, presented the staff ,.report for the Development District Amendment. Bill' Holley, Community Ss,rvices Director presented the North Town Park Density Bonus Agreement report. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. There were no public comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. I Planning Commission Minutes -9- August 13, 1986 - i Commissioner Barker Stated this piece of property has been before the Commission:many times with requests �,n increase,the density. He recalled` statements from the Community when asked if they realized 8 dwelling units to the acre could.,be'ten with a density bonus, they had stated tt zt they would '. have to see what.he product Looked like. He was concerned that there is no product associated wath this raquest; therefo e, no .guarantee. Even though the City would gvc a fi',acre park site, he wastes, o d with the control the City would, haveNver the product type. H6Afelt it was' the Commission's ' determination as'-r'to whether, the procedures and safeguards which would be used �= on any other parcel or,,,product which comes before the Commission would still '. be applied. He was concerned that the density bonus which allows. 10 dwelling units to the acre still give the. City the room to work and make sure that the product and. the standards.--can 'be enforced. As far, As .the density bonus agreement, .he stated the only thing the Commission• could do is to make a recommendation to the City Council. He stated1that even though it killed him, he was inclined to buy the 20 units over the maximum: in exchange for 5 acres 7 of park as long as he was-assureo, somehow that the 'standards could be enforced . to insure a good product. r Chairmw6.'Stout stated, that he had voted against the density increase every time it had come before the Commission. He advised that an Environmental k' Impact Report had been prepared for the site, which is remarkable given the *' size of the parcel. The Environmental Impact Report indicated that-,no m�re than 4 to 8 units should be constructed. He indicated that this propa?al averaged out over 14 acres is actually reducing the density to approximately 6 1/2 units per acre. He stated this would decrease the amount of people land ! the ,ervice demand, which was `one item the Environmental Impact Report indicated as critical due to the size of the streets. Further, that the drainage problem which has been a problem to the residents for a long time would be corrected, and a nark would be provided, which is 'a much needed item for the re sidents in th '' e area,. He pointed out that the density it� very similar to what was approved on' 19th and Archibald, which proved that an attractive project' couT3_be built at this ,density. He additionally stated that this project would still be subject to Design Review, and that the Committee would insist on the same design standards in this location as any other,site in the City.. He was not quite as reluctant to„'reca.ncend approval` as Commissioner Barker in that he felt this was a win-win situation for the City; it that it was good for the area and good for the City, 1 Coim;1'ssioner Chitiea stated thnt,the Commission was told that the comrwnity is in agreement, but the Planning Commission was not informed of any of;the stet ng's which took place and felt it was unfortunate that no one from ViLl community was present to represent their feelings on the issue. She was uncomfortable with accepting a project for which' there are no design parameters and not knowing how the site plan would work or what the product j type would look like; therefore, had reservations about proposal but would support it because she felt it would be beneficial to that part of the j cornrwn i ty. i Planning Commission Minutes 10 r August 13 1986 9 I i 17 7511! Commissioner'Wie1 stated that the City would still have leverage when the project %omes back; before Design Review; there, was not concerned with not seeing the product at thistime. re*iHe pointed out'ttlat�typicaliy people come to the Planning ComeissAiona meetings are angry with a`project; apparently, they attended the previous meetings :and were satisfied with the proposal otherwise q, they would be here. , Cohiissioner Rempel stated he had a great many reservetions. The�fact that there is no conwinity representation t4is evening, was no,real indi a.ion that they were happy with the proposal, jW t that they are begi'nningt to give up: He feat the park shoul', be integrated with the project; simpl,yxcutting off a 'P%� err of the parcel and making it a park with the remainder faily high density housing it that area of City touid have some seriomi-prcblems. He thought a more creative use of the property could have been accomplished, Motion: Moved by ,Barker, seconded ;by McNiel, to recommend approval of Environmental Assessment and Development District Amendment 86-07 to the City Council. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS _ `,`'ARKER, MCNIEL, CHITIEA, STOUT NOES COMMISSIONERS: NOES ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL -carried Chairman Stout announced that Items M and 0 were related and would be heard co ncurrently by the Commission. iw M. VARIANCE 86-03 - VINEYAe NATIONAL BANK A request to reduce the front yard setbaCK for the devel opmant 'o a 4,000 square foot office addition to an existing 4,800 squara"foot office building on 1.44 acres of land within the General Commercial District, located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Klus-knan Avenue - APN 208-15-01. (Related project: DR 86-17) 0. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86=17 VINEYARD BANK - The eve opment oira -L4,uUu square oot o ice addition to an existing 4,800 square foot building on 1.44 acres of land within the General Commercial District located at tha northwest corner of F,)othill .Boulevard and Klusman Avenue - APN 208-15-01. (Related project: VA 86-03) Dino Putrino, Assistant 'Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Tom Harris, 136 9th Street, Upland, representing the applicant, gave an overview of the project.- Planning Commission Minutes - l- August 13,'1986 z Steven�' enbach, Vineyard Bann, stated concerns with a Condition of' the Development Review which required utility undergrounding. He stated that; at the time this project was submitted to the City, this requirement was not, in effect.- He asked that the-banV be Hallowed to enter into a lien agreeme;l#, to j underground the utilities at some time in the future. There`wereno further comments, therefore the ptibtic hearing was ctos��d, Commissioner Sarker statedz that in light of the Foothill Corridor Study currently underway in the City, he would concur that it would`mak�e more sense at this time to require a lien he fdr utility undergrounding. Commissioner Chitiea was concerned with the landscaping 0,aatinent-� She suggested that the landscaping e#e6d around to the—n: sM'an side `df the pro . k Motion: Moved by Chitiea seconded by Barker, to is-sue a Negative Declaration x= and adopt the Resolution approving Environmental Assessment and Yariauce 86-03 with an added condition requiring the extension of the landscapind ayYound the Kinsman side of the project. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: C"ISSIONERS CHITIEA, BARKER, MCNIEL, RF.MPEL, STOUT,--`+ NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE carried Motion: Moved by,Rempel, seconded by Chitiea, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the Resolution approving Environmenal Assessment and Development 4 Review 86-17, with inclusion of a lien agreement: for utility undergrounding. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS REMPEL, CHITIEA, BARKER, MCNIEL, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE carried N. REVISIONS TO THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Reconsideration of Researchand ,rwe opment use stan v s and the potential of authorizing Research and Development uses along Haven Avenue within the Industrial Area Specific Plan. Alan Warren, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Staff recommended the Commission consider the selection of Alternate A.2. and further` recommended that research services should be allowed in Subareas where light manufacturing is allowod under the proposed office provisions Planning Commission Minutes -12 August 13,,1986 \J v � Chairmen Stout asked if the 20% would be cumulative to the commercial uses or if it would be total for,�,oth uses. Mr. Warren advised that it would be 20% total. Chairman Stout asked if there was language which would state that the total of ancillary uses shall not exceed 20%. 9 Brad Buller advised that.there was language which stated that the purpose of this section is to set a maximum provision and goes on to state that a total of 20% of the total building or business area. Chairman Stout asked if it applied to the Research and Development hybrid, or a general statement which applies to the entire overlay district. Mr. Warren advised that it could apply to both. Chairman Stout stated that he also felt the language should specifically state that the cumulative is no more than 20% of the cumulative of all ancillary uses. ' He felt this would clarify the intent that 80% .-',.to be pure office use. He referred to the Chart on 3-1 which indicated that fast food sales are conditionally permlitted on, Haven and stated that he thought they were not permitted. Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, stated that he b,alieved the discussion was that fast foods were, permitted if attached to a structure; free standing buildings were not permitted. Mr. Warren advised that the language in this;revision was drafted to require the 20% ancillary use to be within a structure which houses the primary use. Chairman Stout asked staff to research the Haven Avenue Overlay District language and if it did not specifically.,state that free standing fast food services are prohibited, some language bo drafted for adoption if ;sible prior to the Council's adoption of this revision. He asked staff to ddscribe the differences between the philosophies tF Alternative A and B. Mr. Warren explained that Alternative B s ed Research and Development divided between two distinct groans, office ar► :anufacturing, with commerci�-t having professional service any~", 4ninistratiot under its land use types. He advised that this is the format approved by the Commission to date. Alternate A was in response to the, City Council's discussion and the Council had referred the item to the Commission for discussion of a hybrid where Research & Development is not defined as a use in an by itself. Commissioner Chitiea stated that "hazardous waste materials" in the Research and Development section appeared to -have been blocked out. She ask for Il clarification. 'Planning Commission Minutes -13- August 13, 1986 TIT Mr. Warren explained that in previous revisions there were some minor���aff « corrections and that, this section was actually highlighted to. alert',the . . ' Commission that this section had been added. Chairman Stout stated for the record that staff had provided him with the language in the, Haven Avenue Overlay District relatjve to fast foods .which alleviate<is concern. He then opened the public hearing., Gary Mitchell, representing the Economic Cormittee,of the Chamber of Commerce,- recommended that if"research and development is permitted within the Haven Avenue Overlay DistrrIet it be allowed subject to being anci"I'lary to a permitted use, th��e it meet all the City other performance standards, and that they be confd to a dial ar/:a_within a builclog mat to exceed a totalof 20% of floorrea wit-Win any one building. He stated i'oading dock facilities and other�'types of dail� activities which might be incompatible with office type uses were also concerns. Jim Barton, 8409 Utica, Rancho Cucamonga, did not feel additional Tatiguage was needed to define ancillary uses 'but that the existing language needed o be clarified. .:He felt that as long as ;t,he composite is not greater than 203 no i. additional 'language was necessary. His opinion was that any ar, r<lary activity is acceptacie as long as it does not affect noise, vibrattonf-t-dor, traffic or any other items which would make the other 60%_ occu) s sensitive. He suggested that the more words which provisions contaif, the harder it is ,to understand the interpretation. He suggested that no mo,,e than 20% per tenant with an aggregate of '20% per- 1~.�ildinj alas all control that was need. He felt this was 'a simple statement that #vet=stone has a better chance of understandin;. Lowell Gomes, Rancho Cucamonga, supported staff's recommendation and stated that it basically incorporated the concerns of the Chenber of' Commerce. Tim Beedle, 9650 Business Center Drive, 'Rancho Cucamonga, agreed with Mr. Barton's statement dealing with building area to =;-Nvoid conflict With interpretation. He supported.,staffs recommendation�witk--this clarification. There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Chairman Stout poled the Commission on the selection of Alternate A.2. -There was a unanimous consensus that Alternate A.2 was to be recommended to the City Council. NEW BUSINESS Planning Commission Minutes -14 August 13, 1.986 77 .'r s? P. ENVIRONMEb AL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOFMENT, ,REVIEW 86-14 _' HAVEN AVENUE INVESTORS - The devtwl,opment o one: ,,, 5 ;,square toot office buildtngdn.f a acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7} located on the east side, nf Haven Avenue, approximately 650 feet south of Civic Center Drive - APN 208-153-12 and 13, (Continued from July 23, 1986 meeting.) Chairman Stout announced that the applicant for this item requested a continuance to the'August 27, 1986 Planning Commission meeting. a Q. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS14ENT AND.,DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86-1L - LW DEVELOPMENT he deve opment o a ,. square foot Office bu:Iding. a of land within the Office Professional D.Utrict, 'located on tW south side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Turner Avenue - APN 208-3340.J ?, Dino A;_,rino, Assistant Planner,'presented the staff`report. Chairman Stout invited public comment. r� Sonny Mascarenas, r,!koresenting the applicant, gave an overview of the project. 1. There were no further public comments." Commissioner Barker stated that when this project came before the Design i Review he was concerned with the landscape treatme' :: along Foothill Boulevard. He stated that he would recommend that portidn3�'of the landscalie area along Foothill be greater t----n the street grade so that the view coming down Foothill would not be a long expanse of wall. Commissioner Rempel agreed and suggested that Planning condition 4 be modified to address this concern. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by McNiel, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the Resolution approving Environmental Assessment and Development Review 86-18, with an amendment to Planning Condition 4 to require portions of the landscape area along Foothill Boulevard to be designed greater than the t1treet grade. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS REMPEL, MCNIEL, BARKER, CHITIEA, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT, COMMISSIONERS: NONE carried Planning Commission 'iinutes ==5- August 13, 1986 ` R. PRELIMINARY REVIEW-86-52 - RISINGER - a�consistency determination between, the FoFthill COTMidbr Interim o icies and a proposal to occupy an exististg structure for the operation of retail floor covering sales in the µ" w. General' Commercial District located at 8291 Foothill Boulevard - APN 207- t. 113-24. Debra Meier,°Assistan+ Rlanner, presented the staff report. Chairman Stout asked if staff had attempted to calculate the actual buildable area as this site if ail'setbacks were met. Ms. Meier replied that she did calculate the area and there is very `minimal building area after the 46 feet of dedication°required on Foothill.. Chairman Stout asked the s,. uare footage of the existinc, building. Ms. Meier indicated that the. square footage was approximately 900. square, -Feet. r Chairman Stout openei the,public hearing; r Scott Risinger, applicant and,' owner of Rainbow Floor Covering, gave an overview of his request. He advised that he realized that this was a nonconforming building at this time; however, the property owner eventually"- intends to build a bd1ldinq on the side which would also include the land on which V.- adjacent power`1ool shop 'is located. Hu advised that he had obtained a--,business license for this Fuothili.,location on May 20, 1986. Chairman Stout asked'where the floor coverin!�)`Jsiness is currently located. Mr. Risinger replied that the business is currently located in Upland between Benson and Central. He asked if there would be any way he could seek approval to allow him to open his business. Chairman Stout advised' that the City is doing a complete study and plan for Foothill Boulevard which will probably call for some very extensive revisions to what currently exists on Foothill. He;�dvised that the problem with this site is that it is unusually shaped. He pointed out that there would be some general things that need to be done such as the widening of the street and 45 foot landscaping setbacks which are required along Foothill. These would take a large piece of property. He advised that the situation in this area is that there area bunch of small lots which may eventuaily have to be combined in order to make ahem viable. Mr. Risinger stated that he, would merely Like to get into the building and begin operation; when the Foothill plan is approved, he would be willing to comply with whatever needs to be done. He pointed out that the building - currertly is an eyesore to the community. He indicated that he had resurfaced and restriped the parking area and painted the building. Planning Uomnission Minutes -16 August 13, 1986 � Y .h Lommissioner Chitiea poft�•4_d out that something= that is being seriously considered with the ,Foothill Plan is that this section o.� Foothill will be primarily a,restaurant row. She advised that if the City does move in that dire:tion, the floor covering business would not be in a suitable place anJ the%use world be inappropriate. Jr!'hn uptao - property o+tner, `,d�dlised that the property has currently been ti c�eaned uri. With regard to access, he stated than.`access frDm the Magic LaWt diron to the underpass is such that if you get in the rig?t nand lane you do nit obstruct t^effic at all. He advised that he also own�,,the tool sales shop which is ad.%,gent to this site and his intent was to eventually ccnsolidate the two pro(,rarties. He advised that he had a 3-year laase with Century 21 Pools. The pool company ran into financial difficulty:,and could not meet the .0 rental payments. He advised that the building had been vacant since February 28th. He leased the building to Mr. Risinger and toid"llim that he couldn't move in until the building was cleaned up and he had a periMt from the City to operate. He advised that Mr. Risinger had invested mono;# and he had also invested money; however, no major modificatibns had been ikwi -, He indicated. that if he couln%'t lease tJ c building, it would cut ofe 50 -percent of his Orly income and;h:is only recourse would be to sue Century 21 pools. He did n,-t th`nk that 1;4ing the existing sprinkler syst,m, putting some landscaping on the corner and operating out of the building' ould in any way interfere with the final Foothill Plan. Further, when the final ;Plan is adopted, he I would comply wiict w;iat is required. - {� There were no further public comments. Commissioner Barker advised that the City had placed into tveration preliminary reviews and consistency determinations so that people wouldn't put , . money into a piece of propel to build it, change, it or make major r improvements until such time as the Foothill Plan is completed.. In the past, the people who have come before the Commission either vaunted to make major_ changes or had already moved into the the building. Chairman Stout asked what development approval would the applicant need if the use was conforming. Brad Buller, City Planner, advised that this is an existing nonconforming,site and structure and the applicant would need development review in order to do the improvements he is making to the site. He pointed out that some people misconstrue a busin ;s license to mean granting of approval to be in business at a particular location; howevsr, it very clearly states on the business license that this is not the casrg. Chairman Stout stated this is a ,general ccrrtiercial use in General Commercial zone. He asked what the triggering mechanisra is that says a person has to get approval. Planning Commission Minutes -17- A►gust 13, 1986"' Mr, Buller advised that the Develor�'lent Code stipulates that conversion,;of a gas station requires either a Conditional Use Permit or Design Review fox,the conversion from the gas, station to ally other use. fit' Commissioner Rempel pointed out that this hr.30t be�F1n a gas station for at least 40 years, Commissioner Barker stated that.uhtil tonight, he did not know-this had been-'a gas station. He asked if the-use had been anything ;other than a gas statio^, could the applicant use the bud ding for a flgnr covering Nsiness? . Me. Buller replied>that if there r•as an exisring conforming use and they were simply changing to another conforming use, this woulV Te ac:zptable. He explained that it triggers the. Design Review process once improvements are made to the property. Chairman Stout asked if the 'Commission couli ':make the determination that the building it a comnercial(' lding and not a gas station. r Dan Coleman, Sent or Planner, advised that there is still a problem` since the _ use of the building has been discontinued for a 180 day period. Chairman Stout Mated that- this is a requirernent of nonrn f(rming uses and asked if it also; applied to nonconforming sites. Mr. 'Colemritt advised that there is a provision in the Develooment Code which allows the City Planner to review any-'-alteration, expansion, or restoration of /r a nonconforming use or structgre. The applicant has,.not applied for that review. He advised that if the Comrission were to make a consistency IW determination, .the next step would be for the applicant to submit an application to' the City Planner for the restoration of the building and the site. Commissioner Barker suggested that if the Commission determined the use ct)nsistent, the applicant should be instructed not to spend any money on the site because it is totally inconsistent with what,is going to take place on Foothill. G:adssioner Chitiea questioned that if the applicant is allowed to operate his business at this location, hew 16u•ld the City be assured that he would ,bring his site into conformance once the Foothill Specific Plan is adorted? Mr. Buller replied that he believed the Design Review process could be conditioned on a period of time similar to a Conditional Use Permit_ Chairman Stout stated that he did not see a reason why the building should sit vacant for another year while the study is compl-ted. However, he did' not want them to spend any money on the site at this time. He advised that the purpose of this review was so that people didn't spend any money designing something that would have to be torn out later and then replaced or prevent the improvements necessary later. The intent was not to shut people down for a year. Planning Commission Minutes -18- August 13, 1986 s n L f C Commissioner Barker stated the applicant seemed to want to comment on the 180 day 'vacancy issue, ; Mr. Upton stated that therel;has been no full vacation of the building because work has been going on and the only reason no-one is in there today is because the inspector came by and said he,yrauld shut the business down if they opened. Mr. Coleman asked it-the dW; 'used by Mr. Upton as Century 21 Pools vacated the building was February,28, 19861 Mr. Upton staked that the building still had electricity and water and a c business license was issued on May 20th � Mr. Coleman stated`,�that the business use has been discontinued according to F staff's investigation of`' the site., Further, that staffs, preliminary investigation .indicates he �Nas no bdsirr 'ss license for this address that is valid at this time. ; Mr. Risinger presented the Cjmmission with a copy of his business 1i.rense issued on May 20, 1986. Mr. Coleman stated that thio;was new infonnation; the. last contact he had with the Business License Oop,,A tiient was -'hat there was no license at this address. Ms. Meier indicated that this was not are approval of the business license at this site, but the changing of the address. Mr. Coleman stated that unfortunately the Busines� License Department dues not check with the Planning Department when f4z� ng a change of address. 7 i M,•. Buller asked for a recess tr `allow staff to consult with the City Ittorney. The item was recessed to allow staff to consult with the City Attorney. Brad Buller, City Planner;, advised that the City Attorney and staff reviewed the Development Code section dealing with continuation and maintenance of nonconforming structures. fie sugge},ted that;, staff and, trte City Attorney's office review the background of this s,ta and determine exactly what alterpti-ans have been done. He additionally suggested that the item be referred back to the City Planner and that the-.Fly,,' Planner meet with the applicant for further directic>:. Chairman Stout suggested that painting and general clean up of the site would be appropriate; +however, would not want to see anything more done to it. He additionally requested-assurance that any approval be conditioned upon the understanding that eventually the site would have to comply with requirements of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. i Planning Cpgr+ission Minutes -19 August 13,;19816 Motion: Moved by, Harker, seconded by MNiel, unanimously carried, to Rnfer Preliminary RevJewJ86_,52 back to.the City Planner for final de 4riaination. if S> APPEAL,OF MINOR OEVEL0MENT REVIEW 86-09 GROAT - Appeoi of staff's decision denying t „ installation Of a satellite ash antpn;(a"on the 'side of The Exchangq. building located at the southeast corner _of, Carnelian Street and Base Line Roved - APN 207-031-28. ' Chairman Stout annoui ed that the applicant for thii' item requested a ' continuance to the.August 27, 1986 Planning Commission meetttlg. F Motion: ,Moved by Barker, seconded by McNiei, unanimously carried, to continue consideration of Appeal of Minor Development Review` 86-09 to the August,27, 1986 Planning Comaision meeting. Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by McNiel, carried, to continue past adjournment time. T. APPEAL OF THE UNIFORM SIGN PROGK14 FOR HAVER VILLAGE SHOPPING,C_NTER - CUP DIVER - The request to appeal the cond itiohs of approval or a Uniform Sign Program imposed by the City Planner for the major tenants within the Haven 1►,''lage Shopping-Center located ct the northeast corner of Haven Avenue ana.iighiand Avenue. Nancy Fong, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Isaac Chavez, representing Lucky Stores, advised that,,the"bakery, liquor and deli departments are specialty departments which are not an every story. The signs were being requested so t:iat customers would know that these departments exist within that Particular market. Bill Barker, QRS Corporation, Los Angeles, advised brat Divers-ified Shopping Centers informed him that if "food centerr was dropped from the sign; they would look favorable upon the deli, bakery and liquor signs. He asked Lucky Stores if they would do 'this in order to get the additional signs and they concurred. He stated that they could get by without the liquor sign since it is a general consonsss that most stores have ,liquor, but deli and bakery are not available in all stores. _I There were no further public comments. i Chairman Stout stated that when the Sign Ordinance was adopted, provisions were made that the City would not allow signs to advertise,Ahey would be used to identify. Planning Comnission Minutes -20 August 13, 1986 77 Commissioner McN el suggested a ceiling hung under the mansard roof on Which to hangidentification;fgns. Ms. Fong poind out that the uniform Sign Program approved for this shopping ,r center does%aflou dir�tional signs hung from the arcade. \ Commissioner► Rempel stated that he would not like to see them on the building, but would have no problem with the signs hanging under the roof. Notion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by*Barker, unanimously carried to deny the appeal. The applicant was directed to function within the approved uniform sign program which would allow thR signs to be hung under th arcade area. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS V. MODIFICATION`OF RESIDENTIAL NOISE STANDARDS Jerry. Grant, Building Official,: presented the staff report, 4 Chairman Stout asked that a lettzr be sent to the State Building Commission on behalf of the Planning Commission stating its concerns and number of complaints received on the Building Code- relative to common walls between units. " W. *RESIDENTIAL FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS Jerry Grant, Building Official, presented the staff report. Chief Lloyd Michaels, Foothill fire District, stated that this is a sensitive and important issue which has long-.been the concern of the Fire District. me advised that the topk of residential fire sprinkler systems has just begun to,, be studied by the Fire District Association. He recommended that the Commission give the Fire District 90 days in which to compile a comprehensive report listing options and alternative3. Kevin Eggleston, Foothill Fire District Board, stated that the Fire Board and Fire District woul,.J be very interested in working with City Staff,_ the Planning Cooinissia.'and City Council on adoption of a City Ordinance. Commissioner Barker stated that the request for this report was initiated about a year ago. He req;iested that the report be compiled a€ ;expeditiously as possible. Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by McNiel, unar_imously carried, 'to continue discussion of reside+itial fire sprinkler systems to the November 112, 1986 Planning Commission meeting. Planning Con:nission Minutes 21- August 13, 1986t COMMISSION BUSINESS ; '3 Chairman Stout requested that the parkway landscaping design for Haven Avenue ` be given top priority in tie work. program. PUBLIC COMMENTS ' a Richard Fuerstein, Rancho Cucamonga, 'asked that a study be done on the location of churches within the City. He was concerned With the problems that exist with churches being operated within commercial areas and those within residential areas. r ADJOURNMENT, ,r MOTION: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Barker, ur�Aimously carried, to adjourn. 12:45 a.m. -Planning Commission Adjourned. r Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary i i Planni�,j Commission Minute,;, -22 August 13, 1986� -.,; CITY OF RANCHO Cr7CAA10NGA �ucAtird STAFF REPORT ° c 'o F DATE: January 14, 2987 `�11977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROMt: Brad Buller„ City. Planner BY: Debra Meier, Assistant planner SUBJECT: ENMONWNTAL ASSESSMENT FOR OEVELOPMEh6T- REVIEW, U-38 e ve ap�en ' ,o. severe mu, f= e an nin si:rfal, buiidi�gst--total-ilhg 103,M s are feet ft"the ` General Industrial District (Subarea 8 I cated,fiRs the R north'`side of Jersey Boulevard Opproxitately;350 f.oaL--East of Utica Avenue APN: 20944249,20921.. I. PROJECT AHO SITE DESCRIPTION: A, Action Requested: Issuance of a Negative Declavation f B. Surrounding Land Use.and Zoning: r aean and; In—du-s-UrTail Specific Plan Subarea 8 r South Existing Industrial; Industrial Specific Plan Subarea 9 East Vacant land; In6strial Specific Plan Subarea 8 Nest - Vacant land;" Industrial Specific Plan Subarea 8 C. General Plan Designations- Project site- genera Industrial North General Industrial South - Heavy Industrial East General Industrial - West General Industrial D. Site Characteristics: The site is presently vacant, the only es s ng mprovemen being curb and gutter along Jersey Boulevard. The property slopes from north to south at an overall rate of about 2% Rancho Cucamonga Business Park II abutts the north and east boundfries of the site, and another approved project (DR 86-21) lies adjacent to this site to the West. rr, A i ITEM A ` ' r PLANNING CQ�+lISSI0�1 STAFF REPORT DR 86 38 -- BARTON' January 1'4; 1987 Page 2 5 . ;3 11\ E;t Harking Calcei itionser } Type Square Parking of sppaaces ofNumber spaces if use footage ratio required provided t•:nant 103,854 1/400 260 403 Ih ANALYSIS: K, A. Cenera7: The applicant is requesting Environnmbntal Assessment ' f' or a construction of seven multi`-tenant industrial buildings: Upon approval of a Negative Declaration., the City Planner will grant final approval of the project based on conditions recomaended by the Design and Technical; Ccamittees. B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review,,Committee reviewed project at tnetr—meeting of December 18, 1986 with Committee members Brad" Buller, Dan Coleman and Larry McNiel present. The Committee recommends approval of the project with the following conditions: 1. The plaza areas in the corners of the project are acceptable, however, the Committee recommends the addition of textured pavement leafing to the plazas as illustrated on Exhibit "B"s- 2. Pedestrian connections should be provided from the street adjacent sidewalks to the plaza areas near the street right-of-way and the office .areas fronting Jersey Boulevard. 3. The applicant did indicate that all roof mounted equipment will be completely screened by the parapet wall. C. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee has reviewed the 'project and ditermined that it is consistent with applicable Standards and Ordinances. D. Environmental Assessment: Upon t1eview of Part I of the Initial t y and comp a ono art II the Environmental 'Checklist 'tttaff has found no significant impacts related to the S%Velopment of this business;park. •,• DR HIMBsRYdii ' S ®RrTPLAF D � f R Jamary 1987�t4 Page 3 --__ III. RECOWENDATION. Staff mcomends.,� issuance of a Negative Declaration .or Development Review 86-ao Res tfully s f ed ' Brad B ler City Planner DB DM:vc Attachments ;Exhibit -A- - Utilization Map- &hibit -V --Sites Plan Exhibit,*C- - Conceptual Landscaping, Exhibit "D- -,,Building Elevations { . I w i PlA .a.. 45 C�f I I - i N(.MTH CITY Or. I'PGtI RAI'CHO Ct'O.A�i(IONO;A TITLE-. -/IZL .�► �:���1� PLANNING DIVISIf.N E.XHIMT=_G�,SCALc A" f J I� ' ea. c j��� aa,i�i,�• •r M as r flay 9 ?` toil 1 11t gt t t t t� A.° ► t t�C S.j t al _21 Orb srec f K .rr,. ti• r• 1 it 1 Its a 1.499a of t.HR N In 1;u6 NN R ��,}•yea el,!)r•M + t'.iN.q at —'• t.iii q R L./1o.q.[f Mill fill do o • • I � •—• I.I/i:N >' trill•M tR Is fax �•' ' ( JIM • rut as n att4 xt tr `" �t tt aa1 aaat1� �p a/ i Iy�;}r1 Jt .lii t R n•, ?as i A I l/1 .r• 1- a t ue t eM�tx 1 — tr• Art.V•t• IIi•11• ;1 �H—r`` ei—• 1.I41 G. aut tale ' to or It?I na 1.101 - j- 2 Fzat ' re.r- •r Ite.or ..t r mat I ur 0 U t�...� t + -- I t —' E J t' Y� R - s," r xrame � s reel orEY U t.P• sty — = rarer t•Stara n ca_teaattn 7. - — ! N011T't CITY OF rrc t= PLANNING DIVISDN E'1HIMT- SCALE-= k r w Imp JERSEY BOULEVARD M NORTH CITY OF rre isRANCHO �,UCA'Tkio r - FIF /_/'i. OL ►°`' • ~•j sa,v�3v�6�,L+14L41xa�.►".tida$�.03t,.r•,i�`v0.li_a s,.aq,j►yf ly�l!l..Jtat-�!�a�l�Il�t�re®�,1Eaf+� ��^��A��1P0+s�91��4.��1�=olitt��R����l�l�� ?4t������. f lot !! __ � , 1 Cow-RENCH NORTH CITY OF. { - 5 RANCHO s l CITY OF.-RANCHO CUCAMONGA r, PLANNING'COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting ` December 10, 1986 f Chairman David Barker called the Re•gula�' Meet-Eng of the City of panchn, Cucamanga P1,a 'Commitiiton to 'order 0°7:00 p.M4 The meeting was held at i Lions__ Park Coinoiunity Genter., 9161 Base Line Raad,, ,Rancho C,;Zamonga, Califcr.•nia. 'Chairman Barker then led i•n the pledge of allegiance. ROLL 1ALL ' COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: David Barker, Suzanne Chiiiea, arr'r MCNi.el, Peter Tel stoy ABSENT None l STAFF PRESENT: Brad Buller City Planner;,Dan Coleman,. Senior Planner; w 'fancy Fong, Associate Plar.jer Barrye-Hans:in, Senior Ciy(l Engineer; Ralph H City Attorney; Debra Mel ea`, Assistant Planner; Scott Murphy, Assistant Planner; Janice- �" Reynolds, Planning Commission Secretary; Joe Stofa, Associate Civil Engineer; Alan Warren, Associate Planner; L Chris Westrnan, Assistant Planner ANNOUNCEMENTS Chairman Barker presented a Resolution of.,Commendation" :o 0enais Stout for his service to the City and the planning Commission. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Tolstoy as�—,d that page 3, paragraph 3 of the October 8, 1986 Planning Commission Minutes be checked since tie sentence was incomplete. Motion: Moved October 8, secon86 deaame,Chitiea, :::;animously carried, to approvethe ,. ,a J CONSENT CALENDAR R. ENYIORMETAL ASSESStIEN,r FOR DEVELOPMENT` REVIEW 86-19 - GABRIC -The eve open 'o a , _; , square go .-warehouse on-_y "cres o an in he G Minimum Impact'{ieav Industrial di^strict {Subarea; '9)MAocated un east side of Utica-Avenue and north of the AT & SF Railroad right-of-way - APR tog- r,z 143-05. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR"DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86-30 LARGE - The eve npme:� o a ,,j., �quarc. oO :_ wet s qry o ce .ul " tng Ott' .79 acres a of lattd in the Indus�trroial .Specific Flan°District Subatea 7, lot 2 of the Offico Tennis ExecutiVe..di�ier located +south of Aspen and west of Red Oak APN - 208=062-13. C. ENVIRONMENTALCASSESSMEW, rOR DDELOPMENT `REitIFH 86-32 - 10T 5 PARTNERSHIP - The development af—a, Iwo-story -"Tica oul 14,14ng or 9 square Teer on 59 acres of land in the Industrial Specific Plan M.�tric rea 7 . lot 5 of the Office Tennis Executivi Ce�,ter, located at the noK west corner of Civic Center?+&Red Oak - APN"=`208-L52 Ol D, ENVIRONMENTPI. ASSESSMENT FOR .ORVELOPMENT REVIEN _86=33 - 4LIVERA - The developmentor a pro-s� :y office, u n 1, bob square fee on .66 k ; acres of land in"the I.nn'�strial Specific Plan DtStrict (Subarea 7) lot #8 ' of thz Office Tennis Exe�tutive Center located north of Civic Center and east of.Utica - ,APN 208-06 -K. F + E. DESI6N REVIEW FOR Nl'ATIV' TRACTS 10827 & 108 P,3 - RELCO INDUSTRIES - eview o s plan and�,dinR arq �# ec ure r .;_ en the Tracts 27 and 108-27-�3 consisting of 96 lots.. _ ltin appravtd T'vntative Tract 10827 located between Haven and Hd-mosa AviWues south of Wilson - APN 201-18 02,. 12,, 13, ':i, 63, 65, 69, 79. F. MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86-25 PATTO`i Thei,Design Review of ' mo&llcatlons to the existing s opp t' ,,_en er �tru;repiaeing the approved j ` awnings with gr�,en fabric awnings, tfhL—;apgrad pw pf existing landscaping with additional accent trees, stone �vtneer entry+ erAls .and planters with seating for a shopping center located t---te northeast corner of 19th and Archibald. G. REQUEST FOR TIME EXTENSIGN - PARCCL MAP `4901 KELQ%T PARTNERSHIP Located Gil cit f-nor sicip o oo eas Or en c•,r Avenue. Motion: Moved by Chitiea, " econded by RcHiel, unanimously carried, to adopt the Consent Calendar as_presanted. i i Planning Comaissioit Minutes -2- December 10, 1986 k; _ s � �.. PUSLIC HEARINGS H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL `USE PERMIT 86-15 r " . ZSn e es` a Ttfs men, of a motor come ws assefnfi°!y usiness within an existing 168,000 square foot ;industrial building and the 83,,000 square foot expnhsi-on:of the existing building'un 11.8 acres of land in the General Industrial/Rail Served District (Subarea 2), located at the southeast corner of Arrow Highway and Vineyard krenue - APN.209-12- 15. (Continued from.Novembeif_A2:,1986). DEVSLOP,iL',9T REVIEW„ 86-13 -. MODIFICATICH MESSENGER The request to modify Tq ,preV�eusTylappi ove as ew ,%Fap By reaucira the site area of f Phase 11f from. 4.4 acres to 2.9 acres in the General Industrial/Rail Served District (Subarea 2), cocated at tie northeast corner of 9tn Street and Vireyad Avenue - r3PN 209-012-16. (Continued from Movember 12, 1986). Chai rmiip-Bark;,r announced that the Commission was in receipt' of a 'requ_est by, the apiplicant to continue,the nublic hearing,.for this ire%� to February-, 1987. lie tnen.opened,the ptno i c-rieari ng. There were no public comments,!' 'r Motion, Moved `by Caitiea, se-:mden." ey Tolstoy, unanimously carried, to continue the Fdbiic, hearivg for Enviromcental ;assessment and Conditional Use Permil; $6 n�1 •;and Development Review 86-13 to February 18, 1987. I. '"(ERRA yISTA PLAN►'EG `COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 86-02 - WESTEP31 PROPERTIES A request To amend Tne Terra Vista ,~ anise, Commu Dy es a its ing a Busir=ess Park Overlav,Zone for areas designatedne _v as Office Park, Commercial and tiix d Use, withtr, the Planned Community boundary - ADN 1077421-060 1077,--0F -17. (Continued from octobar 8, 19861i. Chairman Barker' announc-;d that the Commission was in receipt of a request by the applicant to continue the -aulslic hearing for this item to January 14. 1987. lie then 6pAnad the N�tolic fearing., There mere ro public comments. Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by Chitiea, ,unanimously carried, to continue the public hearing for Terra Vista Planners Community Amendment 86-03 to January 14, 1987. J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 06=24 - PLANNING GROUP e development of 5-12,000 square foot conven-nce'sales an—"fir'service center on 1.18 acres of kind in the Genera'r Industrial/Rai'. Served: District (Subarea 2) located at, the,northeast corner of 8th Street and Vineyard Avenue- APH 201-013-15-. to the proposed development is Tree Rewc:•,al Permit 86-61 - A requzs, t to remove an existing windrow aioliq the northern property boundary. Planning Commission Minutes -3- 'December 10, ,1986 y ,t -71 1 ENVIRONMEiTAL ASSZS, , Wff AND VARIANCE 86-06 - PLANNING GROUP - The request o reduce the requT.ea average t1co n sca- ,g on-"BtTt Street ranging from 15 feet to �? feet; to eliminate the re uirei five foot interior side a q ,yard setback fore 14000 sq. ft. convenience sal"-:-Rd service'center:on • ' 1.18 acres of land in'the General Industrial/Rail Served District located at the 'northeast corner of 80 Street and Vineyard Avenue -A_PN '201-013- 15 ' !fancy Fong,-Associate Planner; presented the sta report. Uairman Barker opened the Public hearing. Tom,Matlock, 502 R.,Aolt, 'Pomona, representing the applicant, gave an overview of the project. Commissioner Chitiea asked what type of landscape treatment would be used n around the monument sign.; Mr; Matlock replied;i!that tie area arcand the sign would be !andscaped with ,. mounding and'fl ower5: , ` t Ms. rang advice d that.s ief had provided a condition 'Within the Resolutio;t t, require detailed plans,:to he submitted prior to issuance of building permits. " There were no further comments, therefore the oubitc,hearing'was dosed. Farrye Hanson, Senior Civil 'Engineer, . pointed: out that, the Resolution contained a condition recleiring the undergr-nnO.'ng of utilities within the railroad right-of- f way. He advised that "', had contacted. the railroad company any at this point staff does,�n stow if the utiiitie$ car be undetgr;.)unded; therefore, recomme►tded f- a condition 'ba_ removed. He further dndicated that this is one of, ',-irst projects- in this type of situation. _ Commissioner McN el stated that he would like staff to warp with.. railroad on reaching a decision. 1h right of staff's co-zvent, he cohcurred that the condi ti on,shoul d be eliminated, t ssions.. Ghiti.: -was..pleased Keith fde project and stared it wz.-• of very �,iigh quality o. ;�,Jiff it u't piece of property. She stated the variance is warranted since it t; :: Ainesual piece of property and would be almost impossible to level4p. - She Oecommend approving ; the project. Sne was concernss4, •with the utility' »ndergrounding at the back or prooerty since :fihe City hys ,Qstablished a policy to underground; however, in f'-'It of staffs comments relati,,!ii to the raibroad right-of-ray, she felt that it was unjust to ask the appiicanr to uldergruund on three sides of his property. Cotmiissi onor .4 of stoy agreed and. further stated:;ttat this is a difficult piece 0 develep thcught the d-,veloper had done a nice job. t Pi..AA _ -fiiinutes -4- 'December 10,, 1986 Motion: t ?,td by 741stoy, seconded by McNiel, to issue a.Negati,ve D.4ctaraiion and adopt' the Resolution approving Environmental Assess6iit and Yaehnce 86- 'ift06. Motion carried by the-`following,vote: f AYES-zt COMMISSIONERS "TOLSTOY, MkMIEL, BARKER, C*1:I1IEA + NOEry COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: CtN,ISSIONERS: NONE carr.Ied_ ; Motion: Moved by McNtel, seconded by Chitiea, t', Osue a, Negative Declara`ion ano adopt the Resoluiiop. approving Environmental Assessaent and Cundltzr,)+al -P•Permit 86-24, with the deletion of';Engi neei3i ng dondition 3 c' reyuiv 69 ch£ urdargroun4ing-'Of utilities or: the pro?ect side of the A.T. S:F. ,. Railroad right-of-way. Motion carried by the'rollowing vote:' AYES: COMM*TONERS MCkEL, CHIT1 '. BARKER, rdLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: _ ,NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried ; r`• PARCEL MAP 5786 - MODIFICATION CROWS ll BROTHERS - The rt-q+-.sti to etjm'in p a condition o ;4ProvaT—requirinej"�M e ris'tilation of a iix (6) foot high nasonry wall and, addi 4ionA.lardsea'ping hlonu the southr, oundary Tine for ah approved office park sibd'Tvrsi'Qn located it theC_;outheast corner of Basa Line Road and Carneiidq,.Str i�*`, /4r+N 207-031-28. Taney Fang, Associate Planner, presents-6 the sta +fcporV Chairman Barker op:_ned the'oublic hearing. Harry Crowell, applicant, ,nave ar. ovt:rvi.e-t of the request. Linda Hi rsO 8792 Cal uma Court, Rancho Cucamoy ga,, stated that ,s+';ice the project has gone in she'has bad,pr6blems with seople crossing her'proper'ty. She felt the wall should be constructed as oriciaailiy conditioner! to maintain their safety avd,privac,; Mitchell Hirsch, 8792 Caluma Court, Rancho Cucamonga, stated that it is an unsafe situation at his home. He stated that the property is not maintained by the developer and he has beipm maintaining it. He agreed tha the wall should be reqvtied as previously conditioned. He further stated that the landscaping which has died or trAas Mieiich have blown over in windstorms have never been replaced, There were oo further, comments, therefore the public nearing was closed. k Plann na Commission Minu*.es -5, December 10, 1986 ¢ Commissioner Tolstay'stated-that he had walked the site from the street to .the western boundary of "e slte arl agreed that Mr. Hirko'.z lot is an exception in that the rest of the..lotsY are fairly rasll buffered.' He noted that appeared some'of the,, shrubbery has either. disa5ppeared or was never planted grid felt there are places thai cod}-d stand some more plant4ing along the entire - site. He felt that something should be dons to help the Hirsch's .n their delimay ,r Commissioner MCNiel concurred that there is a problem with .the Hirsch's lot; p however, was also concerned,4iith�the chainlink ,fenci^� <,Ang toe eastern boundary of the site Comni'�sioner Chitiea''stated that this project has been conditioned in the past to address this problem. Further that this has been a. runtinOng problem and a nuisance factor and ,though that the requirements should m be met. She did l-! y not feel iM unrensonable to ask .the developer to comply, with the, riginal - conditions of approval, Commissioner Barker quest,-stied if the wall is-to continue along thisrpieso of ' property; where would it be logical to stop? Commissioner Tolstoy suggested that staff make en 'asse!�sment of the site and make that determi nation.-►n,the wall. He further suggested that stair should make an inspection ofthe landscaping to-see if it needs -replacement. Commissioner McNiel suggested that staff also assess � chainlink fepce thong the eastern boundary to see if it should be walled oft -as well. I_ '{ Ms. Fang advised that the adjac�=.nt,sPn3or housirty proj.ect'; s going to have wrou5nt iron fencing to the sout. end oaf their property. l Ra'rp►+ Hanson, Deputy City Attorney, adyj6bd that the Commission had not been provided a Resolution for this item; -therefore, recommended that the public ' hearing ue reopenpt,for continuance purposes to allow staff to bring_ back recommendations on'..af a wall and provide a Resolution for conside.lion. Chairman Barker rr ,0_'ned the pU is hearing. Mr. Growll consented to a,continrnce to January 23, 1987. Motion: Moused by McNiel, seconded br Chitiea, unanimo%tsly ca--ried, to continue th_ public nearing for Modification to Parcel kMap 5786 to the January 28, 1987 Planning :'ommissior, il,aet ng. 'Motion carried by the following vote: AYES. COrhUSSIONERS F1 kEL, CHITIEA, BARKER, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE I ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NOW -carried Planning Commission Wnutes -6- December 10, 1986 d .771 ie dr it jk ie ,� L. EPI; IRONMENTAL ASSESSMEI ANDD-FARCEL MAP 9897 - WESTERN AROPE ES A subal visio'r+or 14 acres of land into ! parceT`Th ye - ri'- ista Piannad Community located in the southeast corner qf, Church Street and j Terra Vista Pakiay RPN 1077-421-06, 1077-091-17. a Joe Stofa, Associate Civil Engineer, presentee the staff report. t Chairman Barker opened the public hearing. /i Bill Humphrey, representing the applicant, c�ncurred with the Resolution and Conditions of Approval. There were no further consents; therefore th, public hearing was closed. No•ti or.: Moved by Chi ti ea, seconded` by i Tol stay, to, issue a Negative Declaration b1d adopt the Resolution approVl� nq_ Environmental AssessWnt, and Parcel Map 9897. Motion carried by the fallrYing vote:. AYES COMMISSIONERS CNITTEA, TOLSTOY, BARKER,�f NIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: DONE ABSENT; COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried } �?. M. ENVIRONMENTAL MSiSSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 10238 CUCAFiONGiA COUNTY WATER a' subdivis on or 3,43 acres ot land1n'�o 3`oarc!:T1 n =h e Flood Co —designation located, on the northw6it corner of Foithil: -Boulevard., and San Diego Avenue APN 217-101-43. Chairman Barker announced that the Planning ;Zommission,.,Was In receipt of a request by the applicant to continue the pvbi,sc heariog`for this item to the l January 14, 1987 meeting. He then opened the 'public hearing, There were no comments. notion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Tolstoy, unanimously carried, to coretin:ie the public-hearing for Environmental Assessment and Parcel Map 1-0238 to the January 14, 1987 Pl-anningz Commission meeting.- Planning Commission Minutes 47- Oecember 10, 1984 7 t N. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT .80=04A CITY OF j NU&— 'An app Ica zal to ameno rto land use a ement o e General an as'Tollows z` a. (Parcels a.i aiA a.2) - Fide acres of sand, P60.feet to 660 feet � s ` we,t and 280 feet:to 585 feet,,norih of the northwest'corner, rf Haven and Hi eland Avenues, APP) Z01-252 28 ' g , portion of ,30, 262-31, 41, 43, 201-262-01 through 25 from Medium �estdenyial (8-14 dwel, lag units/acre) to Lwt lledUm Residential. (4-8 dwelling unl)ts per acre), and; b• (Parcel b) 1:a5 acres of land or► Havenvenue ,565 feet north of Nib.±land,Avenue, APH 201462-35.,,'37, from'Hedium Residential, (a- 14 dwelling units/acre) -to � either Office or Low Nadium ; Residential" (4-8 dw0l.ing units/acre), and,, C. (Parcel 0 3,90 acres of land at the northwest corner,of, Haven Avenue and Highland Avenue, south:o 6f the future- real{,gnrent of f Highland Avenue, AW portions bf 20-(442-30, 31, ,and 40 from MedfW Residential (8-14 dwel itig units/acre) to Other Neighborhood Gosercial or Office. wi ENYTRONME TAL ASSESSRENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ANENOKNT 86-08 -CITY OF n appi I ca ion w amend zne Deve I oppa is r1c p as- o ows: a. (Farrel a.1 and a.2) Five acres of land, 260 feet to 660 f nt west and 280 feat to 585 resat north ,of the northwest corner of Waven and-flighlant` Avenues, APH 201-62-28, pa ,tyon of""30, 201- Y62-- , 41, 43, 201-262-01 through•'26 from,,,lr (Medium, 8-14 dwelling units/acre) to "LW (Low-:tedium, 4-8 'dwelling units/acre), and; b. (Parcel b) `For 1.55 acres of land .on Maven Avenue 6W'feet north of Highland Avenue, APN 201-?6."36 3T, from *Ir (Medium, 8-14 dwelling units/acre) to eitOer< °'OP" (Office/Professional! or "LW (Low-Medium), and, C. (Parcel c) 6.2 acres of land et the'northw,est corner, of hiY n Avenue, and (iighland Avenue, south of the future realignment of Highla>>d Avenue, APH portions of 201-262-:30, 31 and 40 from OW (Medium, 8-14 dwelling units/acre) to eith0v 'yC° (Neighborh6od Commercial) or 'OP` '(Offi. a/Professional Alan Warren, Associate Pianrar, presented the staff report. Brad Bullor, City Planjler' advised that th- Planning Commission had Wen presented with letters moan Bob Young 6342 Haven Avenue, 5. Craig justice - 6330 Haven Avenue, end George Godlin 6U4 Haven Avenue,, enpressing their opinons on the item !jefare the Commission. Cortmissioner Chitiea was concerned with &xess to this project. if parcels a.1 and a.2 were combined with access i1r.6ted limited to Highland Avenue, she askew what staff s- recommendation woula be. Planning Commission minutes -a= nece mo r' 10, 190� Paul Rougeau, City Traffic Engineer, agreed that combined access would be the best solution with., one entringe o tiighlanci then gmediately inside the prenerties the dr veways cou, a sp�fi . Chairman Marker opened L1`e rlublic hearing_. Don Clumi',s, represtmnting the Clurman Company,: gave an overvi& of his proposal, so develop the site.. He concurred witEi"ft recotflmendatio*ts for Lour Medium t4o8 dwelling units per acre) on Parceel-a- jiH Office Professional on Parcel B. Re requested Neighborhood Commercial fir Parcel and advised that he would he acceptable to ,not having access rngio Haven d-enue, with access onto the Mature N7,9bland alignment. Craig Justice, 6330; Haven Avenue, concurred th; t parcels A-P and V2 be . designated Lew C4ediva. i7e stated that *K: Garden Apartment Homeowners would k prefer to see Parcel-5 remain Low Medium; however, were, not adatranr on that. point and could see that Office Professional could be`ctnsfstent,with their. development. He supper-ted staff's recommendation of_dffice Professional for Parcel C. George Godlin, 6344 Haven Avenue, opposed the Wighborhood Comwrcial designation and supported Mr. i;astice's recommendations. He stated concerns with the amount of ccxtmtercial property currently developing in the City. He suggested that the ;prpperty to the south could po sib',y be purchased by the r, City for park puey 6$es. _ i Floyd Allen, 6402-A Haven, suggested that the plot plan, for the, Garden Apartments be provided for the Comnissibn when they uelibera,a development on the adjacent land. Phylis Allen, 6402-A Havers, expressed concern with the Neighborhoud Commercial designation for .Parcel C. She supported the recommendations of Mr. Justice. ' Larry Bliss, 6634 Carnelian, supported Neighborhood Commercial for Parcel C. He felt that mitigation measures could be 1:24..en. to buffer commercial uses from the apartments. There were no further co rants, therefore the public hearing was closed. Lomnissioner McMiel concurred with staff's recommendation that parcels a-1, end a.2 be designated Low Mediam, and a,lse concur with Office vrofess;onal desigantions for the other two parcels. Commrissioner Chitiea agreed and further stated that Office Professional on Parcel C wound he less intensive,and more compatible with the project across the street. Site had traffic concern: and feltt the imoacts riould be less intensive with that designation. She additionally supported Office. Professional on Parcel 6 as well due to constraints,; on the existirg residential use. She felt that sufficient Neighborhood Cormercial ;propert-y was being providad for the area with the ommercial project across the street. Planning Coraission Minutes -.9- Decembee 10, 1986 s` r� a .�gg ComEmissicner Tolstoy stated that `the Garden apartments are one of the unique parts ag our covmi snity which need to be protected. He supported Low. Medium Desigations for Parcel A-1 and A-2,; and Office Professional for Parcels B and C. Chairman Barker stated that on Parcel B it wou1�4 be dffficuit to put housing which was compatible with the existing deteiopmeht and felt tYat anything that is developed there 'has to be sensitive to what has became "a special hideaway. He felt;;�Office would be :he `better alternative if handled sensl- `.vely. He supported Lose Medium for Parcel a.l with the ut+derstanding therr 'has to be a good .deal of compatibility. He felt Office w-as the t. compromise position for Parcel C due t.© compatibility and traffic concarns. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that at the point of develoyment Parcel B needs to be given a great deal .of consideration so that its design shields itself from the Garden Apartments. He also felt that Parcel C has to have an exwpttonal design in order to be compatible Wth the surrounding area. Additionally, he concurred that no accesses,-should be allowed on Haven. Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by Tolstoy, to recommend issuance of a ileLtative Declaration and adoption of the Resolution recommending approval of Environmental Assessment and General Plan Amendment 86-04A to the Civ Council with the recommendation that Parcels a.1 and a.-Z-Abe, des gnated Low Medium, and Parcels B and C.,,designated Office Professional. ,hbtion carried by the f following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS CHIT,IEA, TOLSTOY, BARKER, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE R ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Chitiea, to rergnr-end issuance of a &' Negative Declaration and recommend adoption of Environm0tal A.ssessimnt and Development District Amendment 86-08', to the City Council, with the recow,!,andation that Parcels a.1 and a.2 be 3esignated Low Medium, and Parcels B and C Office Professional-. Mation carried by the following vote: AYES: C0PISSIONERS iOLSTOY, CHITIEA, BARKER,. MCNILL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried 845 p.m. - planning Commissicn Recessed 9:00 p.m. - P;annipq Commission Reconvened Planning Gorsn;cs.oa Minutes -16- DeceMber 10, 1986 lift i' r; 0. ENVIRONMENTIII. ASSESS.ENT,ANd``PARCEL MAP 10366 -`\KENCAID _ Asubdivision of 4.5 acres of land"inta 3 parcels in the General Industrial ,District, 1 (Subarea 3`) located on tHe?south side of 9th Street, east of Helms Avenue APN 209-031-03." Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer, presented the statt report. Chairman Barker opened the public 'hearing., Gary Sander3on, representing the appT cant, stated concerns with the cost of the utility undergrounding al.ony the frontage of 9th Street. He advised that one of the parcels is in escrt� and after escrow closes and the ma is recorded, the applicant wtould(Uvi,[the funds available;,`however, the condition posed a hardship in that Lit required.pa3gmnt prior to map recordation. Bar:ye Htahson,' Senor Civil Lngineer, advised that it would be appropriate to place a lien agreement on Parcel -adjacent to 9th Str°set for future payment when the lines across the street are unJergrounded. Mr. Sandkrsor,indicated that this would be acceptable. 4 there were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by W-NN1flj, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the Resolution approving Environmental Assessment and Parcel Map ' 10366. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES. COMMISSIONERS CHT171 A, MCWIEL, BARKER, TOLSTOY i' NOES. COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: C". ISSIONERS: NONE -carried P. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13425 - GLENFED OEVELOPMEOT - totalresidential eve opmen of 71 single tamily o 6fi 25.43 acres-of Una in ths_ Low-Medium Density Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of Highland Avenue and 19th Street; • APH 202-211-45. Scott Murphy, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report. 7 Chairman Barker opened the public hearing. { Planning Comission Minutes -11- December 10, 1986 LouisQ':Lawson. representing the 'applicon � indi�ited that. the ,ap licAdt had ' - .met witf,�staff apd discussed the option of providing a pass bock n lieu of'a F. cash dep'vi,t for tbt> instxaltation 0the perimeter wall at the north site `i boundary. '-With inclusion of "pass book" into Planning ;Division Condition 4� she would concur,with'thd remaining conditions of approval. Mr. Murphy stated that staff had agreed to the option oi a pass book and wol:d concur with this request. ` There were no fur"Ier comments, th6refere the public hearing was closed. Motion-',.;Moved by Mc!!iel, seconded by Chitiea, to issue a Rogative Declaration and adopt the Resolution approving Environmental Assessment -and'tentative Tract 13425, with the 'toclusion of tho option of providing a pass book in Planning Con#itioW)4. Motion carried try the following vote- 4, AYES: COMMISSIONERS MCHIEL, CHITIEA, BARKER, TOLSTOY NOES- COMMISSIONERS., NONE ABSENT: COIWIISSIONERS: NONE carried Q. CONDITIONAL USE FERHIT 8646, -,t'.ITATI ' - A request to establish an off- site model ome n eTs o ca"a-T#x vn lots 11-15 of Tract 12238 located { at the northeast corner of Clutch Street and Whitney Court for the purpose of lot sales within Tract 12830 located on the west side of .Beryl Street, north of LaVine Street- APR 208-0,73-11, 12, 13,14 and 15. Chairman Barker announced that the Planning Commission was in receipt of a letter from the appliclnt for this item requesting a cortinuance of the public hearing to January 14,j 1987. He opened the public ba4r,kPg. There were no comme-nts. Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Chitiea, unanimously carried, to continue Conditional Use Parmit 86-26 to the January, 14, 1987 Planning Commission meeting. R. VARIANCE 86-07 - A request to reduce the number of parking spaces required for afood-establishment in a developei shopping center in the Neighborhood Com-erciai District (NC) located at-.;the northeast corner of Archibald and Base Line - APR 22-731-12. Chris Westman, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman Barker opened the public hearing. L i Planning Commission Minutes -Ii- December 10, 1986 k Barbara Moberg, 363ty Barham Boulevard, Las Angeles, have an overview of the request. Commissioner Chitiea asked the proposed seating apacity,for the yogurt shop. Ms. Moberg advised that there would be two tablhs with four chairs each and two counters with four chairs each. Jan Krause, represelj±ing Syca 9e4, nvestments the developer and owner of the property, advised that the lease for this center contg ns a clause that gives the landlord the right to institute employee and',tenant Vrking, which ` requires employees to park in designated areas. She felt, this iise would be at ; the lo4 and of the continent ffit'cing;int,;'the rest aurant.classiflcation. J Rick Nelson, adjacent property owners, stated that the sign for this project contained no dates for this meeting. He did not &L"! `.his use would pose a park'6q problem fcr this center. ? _ Brad Buller, City Planner, statea' .that staff would have to check the notification sign. He po;l.nted out that the Item had been advertised in the newspaper and property owners within 300 feet of the project were notified by i mail. He further stated that the pasting of the public hearing sign,is merely in addition to these required notices. " Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney, advised that it seems the City gces; out of its way to provide every form of public notice possible and as 1F:gally` requireJ. He advised that any one of the advertising means would be AM sufficient to satisfy legal requirements for conducting a hearing. There we.e no further comments, therefore the p0lic hearini was closed. Commissioner McNiel concurred that the yogurt shop at this point in time would not present a problem; however, was concerned that there may be problems when the other five stores are leased. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he had spoken with business owiers in t;.e center who indicated that they have not experienced many pa-king -problems. He supported the variance request. Connissioner Ch;tiea didn't see a .yogurt shop as a typical restaurant use and didn't believe teat the _strict restaurant standards should apply to this particular use. She cointed out that the project provides an extensive outside eating area w:,,ich she felt would be utilizod by the patrons of the yogurt shop. Commissioner Barker was concerned that there was no technical means ,available to classify a yogurt shop as any thing but a restaurant. He stated that if the rest of the Commissioners are inclined' to approve the variance, he would recommend certain conditions be placed, uhi'ch would include inhibition of selling any other types of food and limiting the amount of seating available within the s�+ablIshment. Planning Coe scion Minutes -1s- December 102 1986 j' C� � Mr. Bllrie'P advised'shat,'a i esolutioni of Approval had not been provided forqthe : Comnissiotr; therefore, should-tile.Cmission be leaning towar4,approvill, stafl'�) would nm� gi : . _ d to pr�epareo'a,.Resoiution provide `the facts to.,,mal;e the findin ,. �� a necessar,, for approval, lie suggested'..that the item, be continued"to allow staff to meet_wii�,,the applicant: Chairman 3srker roopenFd the public hearing. r Ms. V,.bberg concur-red with the continuance�yF the pub'tic hearing. Motion: Moved by ToIstoy, seconder, by McNiel, to continue Variance $6 07,to the January 14, 1987 414pning Commission meeting: . Staff was directed to;'r kt with applicant in attempt to find, solutions within the parameters :Iixe#�7of )� designating park?ng spaces, Or-, alternatives for the 1imi.tation; on amount of seating oil possible eliieination_ of aQating, and prohibiting any other types of food tieing served other than'yoguet. ' Chairman Barker annciunced that thefollowing items were related and hould, be heard ccacurrently 6y the Commission: S. ENVIRONMENTAL 1,SSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 1tiU37 - B. C. E. D�&ELO►FPXENT Z PAIiY-"Tim y is ion o acres o n parcels w, i,1, t Industrial arlt District (Subarea�7) located betweec White Oak Nenue,, Eucalyptus Street and 'Elm Avenue - APN 208-35149�.� ReTL_.ed Project: DR 86-23 (Item T) Aft T. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86-23 - AJA The 7eve o n rrr an ce an Master an ° a cen -nT tenn is nis facility or., i.8.5d aces of land in the Industrial Park District (subarea �! 7) located between White Oak, Elm' and Eucalyptus Avenues in the Rancho.. Cucamonga Bu,in>ss Park - APN 2087-351-29, Debra Meier, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner McWiel asl:ed if-the pedestrian orientations had been defined. Ms. Meier indicated '0i t staff will require additional defining of pedestrian walkway locations and ,Oentification on particular parcels within the CC&R's. Commissioner Chitiea suggested that the pedestrian orientation be reviewed by the Design Review Committee. Chairman Barker 1pened the public hearing: Planning Commission Minutes -14- December 10, 1946 �J^ct C�rrigan, applicant, stpted that the pede,"trian v0kways are all: �#�.:lgnatkf on the p a rr13 acts nd idgl buildings in the CCSR's we have"1 slated t�,at from tie buq'idoach e ennis courts has to .be pedestrian ; orientation to get t0 the 'tennis court. No- felt that all problems of Design ,a Review had been addressed through the CC&R's. He stated that the pedestrian orientatinn for each of the individual buildings should be addressed Itrn their_, own design review and not the design review for the master plats.Commissioner Chitiea stated thaE ' she was "ferring to conceptual only'to maker sure that the indlvid4a, �owners.'.sere aware that they load to mak• the pedestrian connections She;Aias also-'concerned that the Favisiq be consistalt oroughout the proj-q�ct. There ware no further comments, therefore the public heating was c'[dsed. Brad Buller: ity Planner, stated that staff would work with, the applicant to insure that the Commission's intent U11:i regard to pedestrian- orientation was clearly addressed in the CC&R's. He felt that Condition 2 of' the ResoYq-' k ;. prdvided the 'language to adegoately address the issue. Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded;,by McNiel, to issue a Negative.Deciaration and adopt the Resolution approving Environmental Asstss,ment and P.arcrll Map 10037. Motion carried by the following vote; AYES: COMMISSIONERS CHITIEA, MCNIEL, BARKER TOLSTAY lilt NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE % 1 ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carw;ed Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Tolstoy, to issue'i. Negative"Declaraton a„ and adopt the Resolution app:oving Environmental As-,essment and Developmenh Review 86-23. Motion carried by the following vote. AYES: COK41SSIONERS NlCNIEL, TOLSTOY. BARKER, CRII'IEA NOES. COMMISSIONERS. NONE ABSENT: COWI IONERSf %NE -carried MPW BUSIKESS U. PRELIMINARY REVIEW 86-65 - '4SCARENAS - A conVetency determination be een a oot i orL` rj4j - ;_n er m lr-oli'ties and a proposed commercial office building located at 9113 Foothill 8qutevar_.d, on the south side of Foothill;, west of Heilman - APN 208.24t,99, Chris Westman, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report. 4, Pltnning Commission Minutes -z5- Decehber 10, 1986 Ti . Chairman Barker invited VC blic comment. 5. Dar, Richards, representing the applicant, gave an overview,�of the project. , Commissioner McNiel asked if the applicant had attempted to bring the building ' . pad farther back off of Foothill. Sonny Mascarenas, applicant, advised that a serfes of different studies were conducted to determine wheN the building adjacent to Foothill would be located, Further, hpcause of the tightness of the site there really are not many places the building can be located and that a commitment was made to keep the trees .1tich dictated titat the building wound be located on the westerly side of the property. He;stated that the building style pis to be closely compatible with the surrounding buildings; how .&, is a little higher than the required height on cAothiil Me ,_,request- ; Additional height .was justified by the fact that the roof is sloped and" additional elements compatible;with the'surroundirg apartments and uses were added to the building architecture, Mr. Richards added that the architect had to make a chok1;e between parking in the front or rear and that the twc.-rows of parking, 41th the proper i idth , between them dictate the building location, k There were no further public- comments. Commissioner vhitiea zAressed the issue of architecture and stated that - fitting in with the surrounding area land making it compatible with the adjacent apartment complex makes more sense than trying to create a new statement at this location particularly;bep�4se of tha_ sit,. She found the rot:f fine attractive :and didn't think f�,e,r quest for the i'e'rease In height to four feet was out of ?:ine. She appreci't,. Pt the,cnrccern a(,�'existing trees and undersUod tie site constraints. The *-Adscaping along foothill was of concern and si;` advised that the main consideration: should be that it is compatible io u-16is of sidewalk and salection of Clan: material. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that one oU the problems Rancho Cucamonga has is out parcels-of which there are many and each ", presents a different set of Fr.)blems and each one deserves a critical look. He supported the concept if parking in rear, th> lai.¢scape concept and the applicant's desira to preserve the trees. He V-L `he Design Review Committee should take , close°'took at 1 the height ante v.Jt the most important thing is that, the architecture be compatible with tnu surrounding area and not stand out and make a statement of its oern; it really needs to fit ins Commissioner Mc qal stated that the project would go before Des;,;n Review ar' part of the ,.-.anal process; the preliminary .,*view is to make e determination of consistet,cy with ne Foothill. InterimPolicle�. Site,tuffs. parc►:1 cannot be combined with any other, and the iesign is basWAly what the City is looking for on Foothill, ha felt the project was consiste-.t, Planninn C .,qission Minutes 46- December 10, 1966 r o Chair�An Barker stated that the apartments to the .east are in error and are at leis�J16 feet too :,lose to"the street to rAgin with. He asked that the Design Review Committee r"iview the height and see if, the height can blend together with the-surrounding",area ° His basic intent was that outparcel"s should flow 1 and not teach make a statement of their own. 41 Mr. Eu110 advised that staff will require site cross-sections, a streets cape plan sharing this project and the adjacent F +ojects, and`,, hotopraphs of the adjacent projects. when the 7mm Design Review Cittee considers the proirt. He j. further, stated the thC, plans submitted by the applicant indicate parking requirements on the net floor area.. He pointed out 'that] the� parking requirements" requirements are based on the grass flour area; these. plans are short 8 spaces f4hich.,wouid require to building to' be reduced or the,parking increased. t Mr. Richards stated that the parking is`'based on the net standard which I allowed at Foothill and Haven. Although this is a commercial strip, this b piece was recently rezoned to prohibit ;,ommercial (it ,lapartments and would r. expect tha same standards to apply at this location. E I _ ter. Buller stated that FoothiTi and Haven is within the Industrial' Specific Plan area and permits parking calculations on net floor area. Further, these .' �.; parking provisigris were allowed in the Industrial Area Specific Plan since` there is a larg6r area and a greater chance for the'parking to be absorbed by neighboring projects within larder planned developments This Is an isolated . : parcel that is going to have to make sure it mbets,,all of its parking needs to Aft prohibit parking from spilling out onto FaotM'11. Coraaa ssioner Chittea agreed that it is important for this project to have adequate parking. She suggested that,the upper story way need to be stepped which might take off some. of the excess s quare footage and at the same tti � address some of the placement ark4,mass1n9 of the building. It was the consensus of the Commission that °Preliminary Review 86-65 was consistent with the Foothill Corridor Interfih Polfcies. Staff was directed to work with the applicant to insure parking standards are met. V. VICT6oAA VINEYARDS NORTH AREA;4r VELOPME41` PLAN - WILLIW LYON COMPANY ons era ono an rea"G4e� ,finPI an war e Victoria age w -6 in the Victoria Plannod Community, located south of Highland, west of Day Creek, north of the railroad tracks and east of Milliken. Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman Barker invited public comment. ;} Planning Commission Minutes -17- December 10, 1-986 Steven Ford, representing the. applicant, asked for a?arificaiion'of the type• of material considered for the spec,al textured pavement at the trail crossing. Chairman Barker stated that in certain areas of the City there are crossingr� intended for equestrian use and the intent would be that the material not be' slippery under the steel shoes. Since the language in the Resolution stated to the:-eet,isi,Icttgn of tha :City planner and Trails Advisory Committee, he felt the material 'tnuld),be clarified at that time. Mr. Coleman 1agree;�Sthat the type. of material should be referred back to the Trails Committee for discussion on what mould bean approprUU'surface. Chairman Barker stated' that it,_ is almost mandatory to give staff a reconfirmation on the issue of annexation so that we have some consistent rontrrl`with this particular piece of property.:Further, this out parcel has to b(i made part of .the parcel and follew the same standards, design elements, etc. Commissioner Tolstoy agreed and further sta,a that we want to take them out of the category of being outpav•cels; Commissioner C►itiea addressed the trails issue and suggested re-wing the word "textured pavement" se that the condition would read "special-'-ieatmene to give the applicant same flexibility. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that there needs to be some kind of announcement that there is a trail, which could be done in a lot of'ways. Motion: Mved by Chitiea, seconded by McNiei, to approve the Resolution approving the Victoria Vineyards North Area Development Plan with an amendment to condition 5 to remove "textured pavement". Motion carried by the following ' vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS CHITIEA, MCNIEL BARKER, TD ,,STOY NtES: COMMISSIONERS: NON., ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried 10:45 p.m. - Planning Commission Racessed 10:55 p.m. - Planning Commission Reconvened DIRECTOR'S REPORTS W. LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION STANDARDS Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, presented the staff report.- . Planni'ng tommission Minutes -is- December 10, 1986 r Commissioner 7alstoy stated that one of the worst offenders;of wasting water is that irrigation' _*stems�,are poorly designed, .never monitored and they,are left on regardless-Zi weather conditions, and not maintained. He could not imagine how an Ordinance could control these situations.' Chairman Barker stated that some sort of direction ,and guidelines on irrigation systems and appropria�,_, Iant material would be invaluable to. homeowners. ' K Commissioner Chitiea asked +if ft-had been concerned to add a staff person who would plan check irrigation systems. Brad Buller, City Planner;, replied that staff had discussed the concept of requiring a landscape architect not only to prepare the plans but also plan ir. check the irrigation plans to insure that the system goes in as it is planned. Commissioner Tolsto)Csuggested a paohlet sponsored by the City which would address irrigation systems, maintenance, and selection of plant materials, be distributed to all nett tracts in the City. lie additionally suggested that the pleat list include c m*n names and also characteristics of the plant be clearly stated. Chairman Barker agreed that something simple in the way of a handout with guidelines would be very appropriate. Mr. Coleman advised that Ventura County adopted .a program which requires a certain number of models within a model home complex to be landscaped with ¢ - drought tolerant plant materials and sc.io type of efficient irrigation. Signs are posted and literature provided within the model, home explaining how a person can easily do the same for'their awn landscaping. Commissioner •Chitiea suggested that the literature might be passed out to major plant retailers so that in their buying that they might take these plants into consideration. Chairman Barker cautioned the use of too much hardscape which may have an adverse effect. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that hardscape wten done well looks well and that combinations of turf backed up by ground cover that don't require,much water a�-e excellent solutions, Commissioner' Chitiea stated that sometimes large expanses of wa�ar have less evaporation and use less water than turf, ;which has been used effectively in some areas. She suggested that this be looked into that as another alternative. Planning Commission Minutes »19— December 10, 1986 }i Lloyd Michael,, ,C cam n a .Cgun t t 0 t ted that.froan now on tho" water for nee«° udeueomeni �3"ep � An+a� water �mrported to the commun1ty from others areae. He gave an overview of ;the Water District's ;G projections fcr comin#years. ? S it was the consensus of the Commission that staff be directed to prepare detailed landscape- guidelines incorporation the techniques discussed by the ' Commission. y Motion: Moved by Chitiea, ieconded �by McNiel, unanimously carried, to continue past adjournment for the following item: X. POLICY FOR UNDERGfQUND.ING 'OF EXISfTNC OVERHEAD UTILITYES - POSSIBLE,, B.a'rrye Hanson, S2niar Civil: Engineer, presented the staff report. He asked fir discussion ®f item 8 which exempts residential",subdivisions of four or fewer single family residential parcels in''cases were the utility lines extend for ,at least 60D feet offsite frum both the project boundaries and the adjacent property is not likely to contribute to future undergrounding. Commissio4i;4 Barker asked that if the City,does ►ic,,,('undergreunc f9r ten years, how would the situt,�tion be handled. Ralph Hans� z, p � Deputy:City Attorney �]dvi sed that the City. wcau„J "have to attach the properl, . not any .one person, through possibly s T',`en agreement. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that in infill-"situations where there is :,. development on both sides and the wires are up, a arson should not be required to underground.;i Chairman Barker was concerned with'the possibility of dcubl2 taxation should an in-fill project be required to pay for undergrounding, then a City assessment goes in to pay for the underground'ng -:since the remaining properties are developed. Barrye Hanson stated that the suggestion of a lien agreement was an option to exemptioi .: He was concerned with placing lien, agreeitients on single family residences._ It was the consensus to leave item 8 in the exemptions list. Commissioner McNie 1 advised th at at.the Cit y of Long g Beach has done an incredible job with respect to utility undergrounding. He stated that he would like to research how they accomplished this and bring the item back to the Commission at some Later date: Planning Commission Minutes -20- December 10, 1986 r , Motion: Moved by Mcie�l, seGandedyb Chitin , uananimdusly carried, to'adopt the Exempt Prd3ect L st as peesente y sta . ' ANOURNMEN1 l � Motion; laved by McNiel; seconded by Tolstoy, unanimously carried to adjourn. 11.45 p.m. _ Planning.Commission Adjourned. D � Respectfully submitted, Y: Brad Buller, I7epaty Secretary Planning Commission Minutes _21- December 10, 1986 :3 r X, 'T1 # CITY OF i2ANCI30 CUCA1Vi�JNGA TAF REP( yFi V V` �4 DATE: January 14, 1987 1977 'x TOiI Chairman and'Members of the Planning Commission ` FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Bruce Cook, Associate Planner St dECT: DESIGM REVIEW FOR TRACT 130610 - THE MCCART'HY COMPANY - eview of sl e p an an uilding arc = ec ur. for Tract 13060, an approved residential subdivision of 19..5 acras within .the Victoria Planned Community (Lori Residential, 2 4 dwelling units per acre) into 86"lots, located at the southwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Fairmont. Lane - -.LPN 202-211-13 i 38. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: c. A. Action Requested: Review of site � and ouildin plan y �{u arca ec ure or previously approved residential su5divisi6h. r 11. ANALYSIS~ A. 'General: tentative Tract'13060 Has approver by the Planning omm sstion on,May'.,, 14, 1986. At that titre, the Commission approved only the subr;ivision design and conceptual grading �\ plan. The Tentative Tract was processed by tue William Lyon Company out since has been sold to The McCarthy Company., The proposed-building architecture consists of 3 different house plans, including both 1 one-story and 2 two-story J plans. Each house plan 't4s a variety of elevations proposed featuring either stucco or wood siding, Plans 1 and 9 offer both a 2-car garage and 3-,car garage floor plan, with plan 3 showing only with a 3-car garage. The proposes unit mix of the 86 lots show 76 tots to be built with 2-story homes, and 71 lots- to be built with units with 3-car garages. With this proposed housing program, the "typical house is both higner (2-story) and wider (3-car garage) and, would tnerefore, present a larger Wilding mass to the street scene. As a result, staff has suggested that larger front yard setoacks than normal be employed to °open-up" the street scene. 10 ITEM B l �.: Pf,ANNI IG Cpc` I�9-51 1,. REPORT ; DR TRACT IM0 =,�1tirCiiRT 4Y COMPANY January, 14, igq,ii �= Page 2 ` B. Design Review,Committee: The Design Review Commi'ttek reviewed this requesf at ;the r meeting of December 18, 1986: and has recomeodeii its dpprovol subject to the following requirements: 1. Frgnt yard setbacks should average 25 feet from back ' of si,de#41k with ,a, mini mum dimension .of ;20 z feet. Increased variatfoW of front yard setbacks should oe `t. snorm it m that proposed an the site Plan. The intent T$ ihat a +'S` offset should be provided which would create setbacks of 20 'feet, '25 feet and 34 feet. 2. The majority of homes are •pt-otted with I rge side yard setbacks on them garage'ii,4 of, the house. A]I owl'hg.for tb&b22'l ots that are jrequired to=provi de RV parking/storage,, the remainingf lots should be plotted,to,.maximiae the side yard on the living side • of the hoiuip 4leacoura4e a functi&,Al and aesthetic side yard that woold'be both, used andd'maintai:ned., As a basic guideline, the side y,,ard.on the living area side should always be larger than" the side; yard on the garage(,si,4et with the house�sfde side yard with a minimum` of 10 feet (,except where-RV storage is Allb needed). ry. 3. On corner lots, gardges,ahould be plotted at a 5 foot setoacw from tne, interior side lot line to maximum the open space available on the street-side of the house, and to locate the driveway as far -as possible 'from the intersection for increased traffic safety. `4. Plot a 2-car garage on Lot 72 showing a",five foot setback along the interior side lot line to"60ve the drive approach as far from the street intersection as possible for increased traffic safety. 5. Flip the unit on Lot 49 so that the garage side of the house is adjacent to the City maintained access easement and the living side of the house will then abut the liking, side of the house on Lot ;50' to provide an increased expanse of open space between the two lots. 5. Complete side and rear property line fencing should be provided by the developer at least consistent with, the standard design within the Victoria Planned Cormunity or upgraded to a masonry wall. - e L� rI �' R:AN 11lG C" S,,t SfAF REPORT , , ' 0R TR C+T`1�3060 xl4C 'ARlHY `COMPANY y't Jahuary t 'sl"987 Page 3 7. Corner, side yard fencing should be constructea of a decorative masonry material for Lots 8 & 13/14. H,owever,,this fencing can be of the standard woad design on Otc.�71/72 6 82/83., a 8. Greater tiering 'Should be shown on---the chimney,cap to " enrich the"$uality of this design., 6 g. On house elevations showing a post supporting a covered entry way, a second 'layer of sanding should r: be shown'bn the collars of both the'top ana `bottom of posts to enrich #ja quality of this detail. 10. Drive approaches shall be designed of the minimi ai'mension (w=12 feet per standard drawing no. 305) on _ flag lots, i.e. Lots 16 17, ;26, 27, 36, 38 47, and 58, and the driveway shall maintain" the minimum dimension of 10 feet within the "flag" portion of the lot to maximize 'the amount of landscaping between t Lots. i All of these ;items either have been incorporated into revised plans or have been included as Conditions of Approval of the attached Resolution. C. RV Parking: The Victoria Commuanity 'Plan requires that RV par King be previded for 26% of all lots within all "L", "L-M", and "M" Land-Use Designations. Based on this standard of the Community Plan, this tract of 86 lots would be required to provide 22 lots equipped for RY storage. A lot is considered 4 to meet the requirements for on-site RV storage if there is a .. minimum 10-foot clear, unobstructed yard on the garage the ,house, and return fencing is prav"de with douole sided doubla swinging gate. The submitted plans do conform to these requirements. sr 0. Fencing: The applicant has not proposed to provide any fencing oli fer .San that required along the trait perimeters, i.e. along the 'railroad, Milliken Avenue, and Fairmont Lane. Elsewhere' throughout the Planned Community, complete property fencing has been provided by the developer. The Design Review 'Committee has recommended that the developer provide complete property fencing to maintain consistency botn within the Victoria P'ianned Community and with current policy regarding residential fencing; 1 j V Ld�NNIt � 4 IO STAFF 16DRT t OR-TRACT:1306W 'MCCARTHY COMPANY January 14: 1987 - Page 4 t I'II. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: in' order for the Pl A;lina t amnission to ` consr er approval, ne following findings"must be made: , 1. That this project is ,.onsistent with the Deve.. ment Code, the Victoria Community Plan,, and the General Plan; 2. That this Project would not .be detrimental to adjacent r properties, "or cause significant environmental impacts;' and 3. That the proposed Use is 'in caipiiance with applicable provisions of the Development Code, Victoria Community ' Plan, and. City Standards. IV. RECOMMENDATION. Staff recommends that the Planning"Commission a rove 1s requost. If the Planning Co�aIssion concurs with the Facts for Findings, adoption of the'attackied Resolution would be in order. rJ1 Res fully tied,`i Brad Bu er City P an j BB:K.sgr I Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location flan Exhibit '"8" - Area Development Plan Exhibit "C" -,Tract.Map Exhibit "Do - Proposed Site Plan Exhibit "E" - Proposed Landscaping Plan Exhibit "F" Building Architecture Resolution Ho. 85-56 - Resolution No. 85-108 Resolution of Approval with Conditions 1A t ���. lYL1AM1L MY1fLKII�Y#MgY{'tpR'LTtll g� s lu I ` n (f w C 7 vi IL v o 0 ul p ° •' QmC9 _-�� \ t w Im t v Am ul ca CC om am A00 { tit a c low i � 4 . I-N ~ E� OPME T PLAN VICTORIA OVEN F� 9ancho Cucamonga,Ca« LAArNT T 9314 TI4�iND AtdD _f �" _ s; *t T waat meteor ca�rw U PHASE i L R ° l: , � t• r`.• towawnv s MOva, 27Ao ac y Yf fYi1•gV V 1 `fit JI 1 f I��iMlivlti tI6 CWY�i. •` y[� .� �� v i . � .. 4orr+auaf pewiw ffAasOWAM iw1f WIN y, MaMrtti' tan Ac f: r ,n I40904tW VON" 1 ` tcrxa ;wwn S PHASE I .% a •=t '`f's` ' 'i:. c � fw.e,.�t►�u�aobatr � � z?'"'^ -i t t =� -�t t• '. � { u�y QKayieaae� ,s Lift t•wat�a i( zit• 7, IfEttt otMY com TOM aw Yz t•zs t Y M•AOIi6Pt90.mAY �pR�iJJR.l1t �f' _ ��t 4Ml 1 asir5 1 ^ _ f M fri is s izL 1 f 3 •�, � � `-^,. tr.r, rf \. 77 PC }I 1r x t.r 1 �— •n 'i T • f ' � to Z >/ Y k f CITY OFFF 'ZA%, IT. ° ITENI- R ANCHO CUCA. jN I . , TITLE: PLAaNNING DIVISION EtI iIBIT- • 1 � 1 TLtAMrl liVy LfN aM 9nS1Y-0YCC'LTYy �� S 0.j ;d t?33¢'' �K rain .+.ata ��`} •�� t,� - - LL AL _ �i ;a�� w•s w s N�a �' 1 jI j 7�' i� jx: ���fE�!t. � 25 "�< ' jjtj�ilifu,o116iQclnueRMrr, . �if f{ �t E f 311i of li It I? P"+� y.. R�r:i!�f.}F7 #I i t:i fl ' ��,IL� I`i.. S i ul 1'� N f:�\ �£�3 j�f1[�� �• t �� % 4 ui" LijR ••r ..,[L_..;...x5RRt4Filih i.:tit �r - ':% �p Lu1. I. \ r •wn... ♦ .t �. �leiertFituj�ttiietttlEi k ' _ aia,�,n��aC .a i W6 ee�ee1 1r�, C3 yMjy{� C �7 .1 1 � ;reaot 11 1 dz e z ED nn , 17 A _ %�� AID .� $ !1•ii {Ii:Xil3ii7i3��liFlid#71l# f' 3 Ip� �aX.iitt.XUi.iii:�lXliii411F111 YXittXXlXNItI � � '�� [��f�� (�}},� (� j 7i•...;i1J1t2 Yi#''1JtX•ifs Yit;Jt = ^ _j, � n e.. - - _ 'lll� au �Jte _ I IN •.�. . i U Z �., Al a19 • 'G i y J Y 1 ' r 77 LU jq 7 JIG uj to vi M1j iTi^ a• � � ,. s _ J • �:a.� CV XOR G � .1,yam. • T. y i• C :$ - _ u PT Hi all 1 ---"Noun iz R --- .- " Bi10 I' N{1gfI�MVV i1R�YMbA3W-0qR 1SN1. 172 � s fill In ,, t 12 € W@ i all <g s ; $ uj LM ! — c � 'R3 CDl °C e �+ F{J' cmgy uj u u fAWAL ;` - ? ,`'$ T.warti rrta ns nr+marawn•i7wt �� p IL if AN ® Qi "® r� [ { 1� fro �� �s:.ri.■r tom' _ "c,. . r i j '" �r t �'♦� ♦�7� s.� w ' s •j' i 5 � K .. ��� � �� r•� `mil. _ n N � t H � � ��]1�►�idH, 9� two cos , 11 N � i FS R 71� - r si �r xaw+N}Fi ''.aria eX�s R3=ir� i1Y 1,74 r } •y\ � , ��,i�����1r I a i �M1pti}Da Y � YtiR�•y. �^.;. aa[r Xr uae ttYN7 .., �Ff A OW K FYM�' t J ,., L of ■ar' �' '� yy'�.'= _ lot f 1 �•y�. i'Rr 4F4�3� ��R f ` 4 0 Yam. ! , .7 S! ' �, _..,i :.�� _ t .t,. .� �� �r ., �� -y �,w � d �I� f � ti u��ua��■®ems ■I � �; / __ �. TM ��� �� 1 ` �I�� y �( \ . ® � �/ J J I ' � �'� • A i. ,.-1i1�1 �1®P tx{� d�=�l�{�� r w �il � m ,. 9 ��' �, ...� r 3 F f�rJ �I Rl '1 -'204: a Ina f - r i _. .. a.. ..,,. ..._..,,... x �.�. ((J/j)/•alp _ ism � r k 1 r .a e ZJ�iiy��'y. Rli dal [ aar Y i� ' zapy ow =���e�1■�Ec` ieni��� � � � . r �f 4. k * a ' Cali a In \ ^' dill Ma� ■ i "��® , 1- MEW � o�� IFF o r tur In RIO ;N IN to INK LJ inn mass t� 4.It.t r I L � {i#��*���taw ��� •a�7i rV •l�E�aa Y9y3='� fiMzZl}a .�it'La�?Ys,s,�a,� ♦s•r. •wi. �,.. l ii r♦�1 l'1lT ++� ti�Mi'yy " � 8i�r,:4:r2;�.•�. ,� e •I 'C � :�i limb e -n t,.�"-7t r � * i✓ItrFyt�,ltllttt#.ttt[ ll+ji. �. .� •� i i Y+C a# _mow. lRr._r+f is K'aiy tlyj't: �: it yy i�T�.QQQ� low �,, .;#ar+r'� It ,♦ a e{ rrTy fin i y' srl/r. rr�c■ 1} ,Ma) vim 6 � 1• ■1 v. f i RESOLUTION NO. 86-56 A' RESOLUT40. OF: THE�:PLANNING COMMISSIQ4 OF 7HE CITY 0 s RANCHO CUCAt1f1NGA; GALIF`dM1,A, CON6U10frA';# APPROaING' TENTATIVE TR`AC1 MP"N0, 1i&6 a ` WHEREAS, Tentative��'Tract Map'No. 13060, hereinafter "Map' submfitted by the William Lyon Company, applai:oant, for the, urpdse of sub;divi�dlriq the real property, sirtuarteai i�i the City p!;"Rancha .vucamonga, CoIity" of San Bernardino, 'state ofs>C41,00rnia, described .as lq.5 acres wfthinjthe Victoria Planned Gcmmsanity (LaH;Residei}tial,, 2 4 dwoYllinC chits per acre,), Tcicatod at the northwest corner o venue acid the Sduthorn Pacific gailroad (APN: 20? 211.13, 3dib rota 8a: fasi re iUrly 'c"gym@ beforr ' fie titan 'ing , Cor fission for public-heari actlon on Mai 14, 1,486; and WHEREAS, the Cpity Planner has re 4Nmended ac'proval of the Map` ",zubject to all condition?,'selM :forth in the Eodfnearing and Planning Division's reports;, and <' WHER6a , the Planning'; onddission has read and considered `the �} Engineering and `Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. h <° ,J NOW, THEREFORE,i the, Planning Cokmission, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The P1;AninS Commission makes the following findings in regard to en a ve Tract No`; 13050 and the Na thereof: g g (a) "he tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Develop ant Code, and specific plans; Jb) The design or improvements of the t$ntt ave tract is consistent with the Gena.ral Plan, Development Code; and specific plans; -: (c) The:;site =i s �r W'--J cal ly suitable for the type, of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmen*mot,. damage and avoidable injury to humans and aildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; jl i +y` ...:.4 10Da"is ��. °a s0 UTION >� TT 13060 -`The Wvin,lam Lyon Company Paged •(f) The-design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at iarg2, now of record, for access through or use of the Property within the proposed subdivision. (g) .That this pro3eet will' not create adverse impacts on '. the lenvironinent. and negative Declaration is issued: F� SECTRON Tentative Tract Elan; No. 13060, a copy of which is t" attached. ere4o,73.,°,hereby-approved sub'ect--to al1--!Of the following conditions and the attached'Standard Conditions, Planning Qi<vfii�m Prior to `recordation of Tract 13D60, all conditions of approval applicable to and imposed upon Tentative ;5 Tract 13022� shall be co*1 ted a Ith3 including, but i not Ifiaited to, the completion; of off-site improvements. Additionally, the greenbelt trail E areas as weU as Groves Park improvements' shall be comploted prior to the occupancy of the first unit within this tract. I 2. Pry r to recordation of Tract 13060, the Final Map iF. for Tract 13022 shall be recorded, 3. This map is being approved as a Tract Subdivision only. Any future proposals for te eve opnten o five or more residential units be require Design Review and approval -prior tc tho iss,Wpce of I building permits for any units. I 4. Concurrent,.with any application for Design Review,` t the applicant shall also subrfft an,acoustical study detailing what mitigation measurds if any, are- required to achieve noise leve's", both exterior and interior, consistent with City Standards for lots abutting ei -ther Milliken Avenue or the railroad right-of-wa ;, S. Landscape' treatments at the end of side-on cul-de-sacs shall is designed to provide an open view into the-interior of the cul-de-sac. Design treatment shall_ include then use of decorative wrought iron fencing and sidewalk connections from the sidewalk to the perimeter street. PLANNIUG,i0dtftSISI IESOLUTION May 14, 1986 TT 13060 - The Willlsm Lyon Company , Page 3 Alft 6. Lot "Pi is to be developed as a puhlic easement to provide a trail connection from the Victoria Greenbelt System,to the future regional trail41'6ng the railroad right-of-way. This easement'is to be a minimum 15' Wde, with mean6e_ri_ng walk a minjmum of 6' wide. The ease-itent sWaM Be I Ily'deveieped with sidewalk, landscaping, LJOW level- lighting and .fencing prior to occupant' of the first unit within this tract. 7. A six-foot high masonry wall shall be provided along Milliken Avenue and the southerly tract boundary adjacent to the railroad right-of-way consistent with the approved wall design for Highland Avenue. These Malls should be staggered and offset., to increase visual interest. Tree well `insets per tk approved conceptual landscapo design for the slop( planting along the southerly tract perimeter are to be,pvovidad. Landscape.maintenance' easements will be required where perimeter .walls' encroach into lorivato property and.;are to be dedicated on the Final Final ,pl��tting of all, wafts and 30cztI ns at all landscApe easements. are to b determined prior to recordation of the Final Map. f . 8. Five-foot ;jigh decorative fences will be required F along street side lot lines for all-lots that'either side-on or rear on,to Victoriai Gro' ,s Lnop Road. in rear-on conditions walls will be`6f masonry block construction. In situations where street grade is below pad grade_resultirg in a'sloped parkway, fence lines are to be coincident with' the top of slope. Landscape maintenance easements will be required where fences encroach onto private lots and are to be dedicated on the Final nap. Final plotting of all fences and locations of all -easements are to be determined prior to rc-ordat►on of the Final Map. 9. The slope along the southerly perimeter of the tract Is to be landscaped consistent with the approved conceptual ,.design employing a decorative graund cover plantvng on the si:;pe bank, shrub massing, trees and a cont*nuous win0row planting with intermitte,¢ nodes of accent trees at the top of slope. Windrow trees on property side of wall to be irrigated by a separate irrigation system, to be< maintained by that property seer for each 1 individual lot. Accent trees and slope planting on slope side of wa,Il to be on an'irrigation system for maintenance by the City. Block wail is t4 be of same design as th t approved for Highland Avenue. Construction Ian scape and irrigation plans detailing the final design of the slope landscape treatment shall be submitted for the review and RESOLUTION iayW 14I �gie340 . The William Lyon Company d k fit Or t� approval of the Ofty Planner 'prior to the issuance of any. grading, permits. Full slope improvements udi inclng walls, i°andscaping and irri. ation shall as installed prior to occupancy of the first unit wiihin this tract. lb. Any retaining walls used are 'to be a maximum of 41 high. 11. All retaining walls visible to the general ,public, 'x i. . on the str,=eetsi4e :of •corner side yards and . within the front ,yard, are to be constructed 'of a decorative material to the satisfacti`tn of the City Planner. 12. All back of lot grade differentials are to be a maxirmUM of 12' Engineering Pi-vision 1. Victoria Groves Loop Roadvsha`el.vie constructed full width to Highland Avenue �ith the first ,Ppase of .J devvelopment. Sidewalks and 'park►iay landscaping-may be deferred until adjacent parcels are",developed J 2. The entire width of Victoria Park Lane shall be,, constructed from the Loop !load tit-Milliken Avenue with the first phase of development, 3. Ail'liken Avenue shall be constructed as ,-)Ilows with the first phase of development: A. Portion from 'Victoria 'Par-,Lane to Southern Pacific Railroad:` (11 Full improvements ter west roadbed, y (2) full median with only one '`opening at the Loop Road, and (3) A minimum 18' wide pavement for the east roadbed. B. Portion from Southern 'Pacific Railroad to Base Line (toad: (1). Full median, (2) A minimum 1811 wide pavement on both sides of the median,' i -0118 O�Utd May 1p, � 1586•'`' '� •" TT !�C60 The; Wiiltam Lyon company ` Pa3e 5 jL (3) Drainage control devices such as paved �\ ditches, AC berms or cubs shall be,, installed as approved �y the City Engineer. C. Railroad Crossing: (1) Construct. full `improvements for both s roadbeds ina 1"b ng ,medians "(except for parkway sfidewallks and! landscaoing) for at least 20& on both°sides of t6e railroad. ' (a) The dovmloper, shall abordtnat I*tth the City to have 'the railroad:crossing signal anc` arms installed ,prior to occupancy to they"sat-igfaction-of ,the City Engineer. P . 4 , The cost of the permanent Improveaents in excess; of the. standard orie-half -street ipeproveeernts adjacent,-'to the :tract :boundary shill be:subject to,reimbursement from the City for tiie a acent piroperty owners upon development of their prbpes°ty. 4. storm drain, easments as_required for F,ross lot drainage shall be dedicated on the final gip. 5. The storm drain master plan for the area shall be x completed and approved prior to .recordation of the final swap. 6. Construc►�sufficient storm drain Itacilities to serve each phase of development as "re.-qui red by the City Engineer. The facilities shall be designed to contain Q100 within the s!lreet or easement right-of-way. T. The slope areas along Milliken Avenue shall be removed from the lots and, dedicated as street right-of-way. S. Southern Pacific Railroad Slope Maintenatice• A. The applicant shall obtain •from Southern Pacific Rail Rcad a signed license/agreement on behalf -of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for, planting and maintenance of the slope easement on the railroad property. Applicant shall be responsible for maintenance of slope planting and irrigation systems until such license/agreement can be obtained. 13 j . M:.. PLAHN+Y 1G 0 3 F2ESOLUTLQN tpay 14 .1986' TT 13060.< Th rani,Lyon Company Page 6 . B. ihe: applicant shall provide adequ,1te. vehicular �+ access, to the railroad `slope alaif lbinan,ce area to'the satisfaction c+f 1`he City Engineer prior 1� to recordation of the na,;: APPROVED AND ADOPTED TH TH DAY OF MAY,"�1986. I' 1 PLAN COPtMISSiON OFkTHE CITY OF" RMOHOr Cl'CAmomm � BY-,, C�. +r K. enn s aFFIMP Alre ST: ra u e epuc Opt aryy �I I Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the ann iss on of the City ,of, s Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby ceetjfy is' at t for g®igtg Resolution was duly and ` regularly introduced, ;passed, and addopted.'y thg YPlannrng CorteaiVsio� of-, the City of Rancho CucaAongar, at"ra grula,. meeting of the Planning Commission held an the 14th day of May, lg86,'6r the fa7T7oa1,ng vota=to wiEt: k AYES: COMbiISSI,'ONERS: BARKER, R41PEL, CHITI6. STOUT NOES: COMISSIONERS: (R NO4E 11 ABSENT: COtMtMISSIONERS: MCNIEL i -3d a'coTvo�us. aL... 99LL �« a_N_QCLtlV^paw. ��o �'{' •Li YS _,e a^os,=. R> .o�°GG�'11 C .• S G�A . JGi. -L O Yur OLR LOd •a tl~LYAW N r� Y.aL�C G Ytlya qy YC �C211 Y G GN•. F Oppp4 O O Y.. V" N 1 VeE:��'4�a�' a : w�Q. p oe✓.Y•at ..7�$ '' u`ua,o. Yr?v yLi[Y.wo f._S s`�NM�o= sLOGy f.y Egg y 3 N^ COX= tlE.Yo=3�nld�''= G '' s s3 gL�y Lw ,tl�a{ow awr $s3 aN EN s� tlG�Ot.tl.S w o � ro.aE Y. tlsys O 4 G a:G>p 3L.�i.LC' .��a d0 ILayC was . s �.y .,•4 �"�.�%�c � y rdS �gtly tlY oa>day. X� ��t... � " ion sx Qav��� h ,�iL•"'r� "'"i ��$s ^p� 1 •'1O{{��tYytrN @CC 6tla Y$ Qpt�py tl.V ♦�Y ax �Z0.99M49= _C �� G,pN 4y 4`ad 400L� Fi Ga•.RV v « t 4 .. . 11�yy N •y� Y � L C Y F. y O diye Cw�yu w�.6 �pp G Y V 6C�S.:m \`T� Y d. M � CNGTjQtl tl�/y tl O � QM iiObM16{,CC"�.J r � � 5`G Y r Y«yYV Cyy r � L j y Q• YCeY L1 iH s` n� �a• � ?� o Yam. s 'o'o .'Y L.�� � E Z (ay` Qpp LYfr3 1•A=y Sr e �Z d jil Q 4 a tl +a W=µO� .z y V w O C A•On,i'e NCAY eTYA A." i1 w.aa c�Po o✓Fg ari ,3�Qi:aa -Y•• 'o rBN.tr ':� L ` rYr� eGO Qyw NL tlr .0� Jw"6•J••.n O. S •0 � 1` g N.i w 3?M.. VVY =p N•Li• y S+O` V yY O C� O, Y i@w h. pb�-G Vc.N� Opp c VLO V2 * Ywe..Y t�.}.e. NJ Yy�c o YeEcEi�?�.r; ww •'� � _r, `o citi O C?dL� O.U V�yy Y ws p d y p d 3 l i N M c 4 C u N.•1 30w� `ram. VC CJ BOO 7 YNN +'.. �6S MY• - x, u y C 1 r C 4 O ir M q�5g Q t i_1 S i V • C M y ZL ptWO ytVL+L r".LL Ocp NY Y 'r^ n �wG G S.:. w_ `ry3�•y.Mtp' Iwi•A .. a = Q �� T�••-v m lm L'4N' zz,*y O�.i� hw�Ya:Ld iu+" i NT r.w 1i YLo•'.c �Nw L Yc�ws pg,,cnKu oA�Y .� .3.vYu ,� ry. C.o u.Y �•pNr� ^_�yM•9N�^� VROM.,Y.YM• vUy u_ 4Q�4 .1 •+O. dC yy Uy Y�.�W$L L �.� 9y �Q�� •pg CR c �V Cp ea Vy •:I � •ice M Lv 6'il CV �pp CC xr am.�. y g S•�crm:AC S', �..� M.Yi Q' `r.0� A L d��e wegggc$ r •0$opt• 03 �'� as o L+'�„up.. �.N�Y a-+ .7 ab i �f3 .NY- .G.$q �Ng}�Yv�.� •o N.J.a�•b' p M e .- 4 =C a•�LY•:. YkwOIS r.pRpA C^i'.,t YJ G,.GGN.Y.^#O 'OI~yVd �$ C CC Op •i byW ;.y G Yrn YtrO�`'va�ti Ygy'C'J.� Nt. �WV • Vrp`� a•L � ��r �`y'C �1�T'K -.lswp� ,�•'�` M.IO Yw MCC Y YCN @J eX Ma Y GVwJT Yy ✓ 4a G4C VY4gY�N Frjyp rQ ZN , 1q S_Q �> GN Aoa� �•n rz 2z.i C N yy s yy yy t O,w`d+e w CIr��Li Yy c O _ '.' Z0 �p L_ r•q�.' R•r.C O K w•9i7 tf�' y�l: �••r•� .S ,Q$ b lr! b¢ O w % wN�'A•�•a YY �p•. ta•OS NCaCyy• t •� QQ !N• 6� tY rp.•�= �:y Q'YL.AYs NV k �I I .••I. ^ wl N 1p 1 � - F �' k 9 u as VGac� �i'« ~p>p• V`CC•�v 3 O u9 rtlq = LL t - dic L uL N 'ti 2� >J Ow 8Y 6L qq O G• C � T 46 N�•. ��N O•V C i Qpy$s(, t•�Y•.H 2 E .`•+w _ �i ie4 ywc� "A'_� � F �e•.jr Q'..«.. bFi. '• va w•'•.o N3+cN us •. O �.Y •OY�tytyaa �w4pv V a��A'. w•Y. �Q Lt�g Y„uC'. Q74F0 T.S. P p~ `C Q O a r »v� 11W0 c cN a�eY �`nQ J os Oe; NY CC-3A GG���. •Yi 3«' c'a`'Gp".c�o'yaY°..NYi oL o a'�Y� y�'L Yy= V i vC L2C,yam' �i•�,'1R`±"d' sGOV� r�.�r� �N •v� Y ri:: i s u'�. p. 9 L Y O• O�WO� go_ e g 9 O O • ai.M �? tl0= ' .]��YIA 'L.O%V ML C uOQ .�y �cN wu.�LC ••ape}w. .'a.YCM ?y'i� .` '' 'Ngff' .. v YS.�•= '.i rs C. Ss�y9:L'cL u ova• cp:..4�5 d p_. YL{�jf. yo9 t:y OpwyV < � 6G~QWN cc .NOG c90r GU '° : � %� p4. ov{i vi :CeO � �.O.�r• Re �� c y,00.A C• `w o■ e 1 YY= Y y 6t aO.. .p. N rio L1' Yob .OT 7 OWc>> O C>M OQ C p pdYf L3. LP •� `O O Y Cn.y V rl pyp <'w 6t 0. 6 h•LNp <�Np. Nw�•KV LY 7M Cie •t-•N G'C LC:`w6 - l3-3� V V P O O= M Y L Y4 V tiF Y jg. Aft •.a+.4 rd. w� u �.� ��: c�aTa w .dr'�.p c+Fya aA.. 4e 4 PI qm>VC b CC' CV 1. G L.� eM4H. O1i.^ G OW �♦ y°'$o+II�aQ OCM.Yj uaLi4L� � qy� '� . ��Q. iV PM. '� a0 • •V �y009 Q.V V O y.. 9dV+ > G«�V N •� yy tiY. YM VYO��N4G C4Q� i. �NY.� (� V��M \qqqb` GGC ~Yy 2V. � •Y4M p:L � O . .0 Z. ' 4 �•P .0 .. w�. Cq^644F w.N� YL id Nep 46i �X}s. Ywy >6:. *'NNV ww.`yq AFC rM y�'CA all `a R' YctlC ..Sze ba a `'9i.".r p er p ooa..^� o•' rr. r''.�aa .ter aa$g bt�i•C•.�'w u>ti �io a d9 yL�qO'6Pp.• +�,$��3.� WE F42 1 .qN �q 9y{�.1N Nbi OrVC.tiy Yg4�M CYGi C wN Vi4 NVwN.L G+ w Gp�P� M4YEC0- �dy4.. � art�.µ�in +d MxbN+. c» ?w`o F`qR •�N�..^A♦ns P.��i-�Ap +C,q��� ��`��wo;� - s . w n ` yn`� ♦lT. Yi M 'r 9 cS Via: 5.°.q LFC�aisN� -. w$ •'g`n �s Ns `� gti cday.. ur n�'a. 4{>.P..L.p L.y ��: � wQ .. ~Y ♦ ,�w a.,��V. �» pLL� iYS�`cN .a T IS, lipoc 3�La 4Z ~:�. V+u`"` � """ "{may 5 �b "N.•c.4 •'b. �+� Y 4 V p �Cµ6w SY w. ,.V er,.. t yO O � V4 E94COCV �� Vw, VVM44 Y1 �L'�Nyy� VqC yjyJJ. by C,l 9 TLQ Cd~ O � +r S1.'f' �4 nVVGe. g> o��.�■. G a L a y. � V A.t tY= Y M Y j� 4�.�t$. L Ew.0 6�aIS - N V>dy r'Q wq ♦r�' 4 N �. Gi..C> 9•� p tA� Y y O a�Vr C Y+1 Q1 X 4 C � 9 ...a M^ C<1'l 1 4•bM' 4 N. �ti waC �xr Yl.s `N r..� yOL 'CC v y+• ��M�a1 Loy V 11' to W.. <CC� � v • !i '-- -�_� YAW == gV K MO^. 0034 ^ `l m A y tiVau4. WyL '�uC SGe VC Ov. VGy yyG '.Y 1 `uM= e'Y �pv4 y4WT. _`— `a II OJ►_' CC+P� .� S G4 p> �e u�f ut Y i9 L. — 4N pp CP OutG —`�,..p 4d' Vr y4r YV 3■■ !y 3 y c r, .y.�Uu a— � � N=� X.�'�' �q cg avr � o�u0 C�N�p• P�4� p '�+^ .a 's z C—m 4 "e N w O•L W M »N Y I 3� up c._.gpq� pp_ yCC ' a � O 6y+ yO�■y\O.YOCC NCor � Y +a G '�+P. pF�.y � ow Claw $ i •'-o ��`y �v"G`m`d �`.o W $e o ���o oaP,yoc•�/,=� `t'� yy y ^s-a a.o NJ y` y .: 4a�y rw.Y`.�" w�a`8� ��a 3� I1� ��'� s.N.vy•v��. $`y�: $ � e5m "o r.�i.nar., 3vMi �5 P i rtS y WL iy 4CWN 6—+v0 Vl A4 yam` FVp C s a a'i tip. +`-ny'a,• L $ . � i o�g� ,5: �N'" Via: n �y M C+ wty � Q OL Oi F `y OaL�� T VL yWy N� + w Y ONLO a YCij NC '� ss N Y.r—d.. '+ 3w 2q VC »yV � gt�� �a V ]£( Q-� pO_V O u■0Q„ 4 'C Ny, =_ O ` t.pt �` uy q. ZZ t CL N` J OV�� a a4Y C.JO M C� N:uN.. YL OL jai r\M 4 L cYL4. ss N,u,•� a'L =p — a. C a u a0 NR 5. yG,w d,L �~G = �V w � ^- a ee C 21 .N. 4 a�"!4 O~ C Cam.6. L Y H 3 O Y~a' r-6 A 4 O'GGvY �... PCN C+ n14■y Q��a.M. cQ _ J` NaM V OAy 1V< yNV b�wS� C S:C'C —16. fa6"' 4.Y. ayi Yfy �fL y ` G yO� Ic C 1 ~ > W y, Y �V Ql Vr.Ga L NL`�— aCO Y.O V• .0 o t^yOt 6+ C 1JLA�+C � y4 GN �1� _4Cyw PJpp .VVpEqg R6Al boo. +a oc.rle bti+� Gu w 9 qYy tl^ 2rn�.0 LRY $ r uOQC ^u $ • µ�. aY YQw Li..� : s ' zwtl Vp�. Y✓y � Y ,Y� al tetaa C01 4•y I p MMM dy r•�.. V Y.0 ".Y p r N.� �. J�,..�`--� ���;1 w �N+ p O P CL tea;! rz bz tl� La�1 `Ya H r s iv I Y 1-ai y:rl P Ny a�<'bA� Yg�yYjW^ 7•V. `w f � Y j�An. Nx CCY b� Y � Np N~ - .. ra u yyw w` w'�`$w LW zm yg� is a oo. 3Y' LS C �s` y0it `Y Qw. wP Y. C- 2 j Y Y C r� b P_ 3'+oe «Y �•- a~p q Y'o. �Ca .fig ey`yi s` s -,A ao? e YYi� rg�`y bYa�N awCC �+� K o.r. N 6� p Y1�a ww �1..�. YO• p��V �+Cf. - Y V 9w VT' u4 4Y a0Y yNp Y9V1 4A G+�..Q.�u c G t W�vO tiL wuu Od u�G2 !': i `.O• L�pir � O l♦♦ CC L ••• 000 p L faprrrr MW ��10t b C Ny k� y� wa � yr tit a l S o s ooar 33.F n Oate- Y p V V r Y y`.�n� i^ y N p L �Y N j 9�Y -V ♦ C� Rom. N l 9 I ♦5 .{3 \L v.N 6����'{,j{�Y�• ��YY -mix py iW pC`'4 p. r♦1 ,,� C ~� $ity ✓C Y�..� :�• Y G.p. M Y p ~`61ss ,. i Nv g - aCn6W p}pe p''�.s !• Op UC g�YLaI Y O� Y $u V= u� p.»Z, a,C »w `'y:Y AO I $ .^..� O �E �ti MV YL. Sa Yam V+�. C.♦"`a n` °r yaw i.+.3 c l'i'"Q.ji. b a l.♦7M' / ``C �Y VC ��"� yO� L��»w1111 �A' �N � Q�40 p,4t� {� eY 4 �� �+�C^' •p�� i1 q��` y& �YY Y� C� LY,n��Y��' Y �' q LO $���o off• ^�'�. p� �$� .�o Ll �+ASV` �` �eY ^, "� Ftf�. _�Y, `� ��^' ■� �� +pn u�as�' 23am. L V{F> 6 Y 1f y W^— i .y .• og .54 i y0�.•♦� „L�^,T ri��. ww♦.N� ,y W. Cis: �_V�a pM'� YM� y p + ' a a ,tea g a » » $ Ya a$ w� 'X a .Q sc~si n Y emu$ E py Y _ y �Y �r¢6�. Z.yy l V a V p N J C o' ^O `.t`. '•�$ <t ■ G �.. try Pa�-2 o^ .i'.^� 1 1 Q.+ i C • w � �Cjtl yCj may.�'y0 V� +1� ` '�^ R, y aVi�I L`` G qM.+_ C� S�. gJ� /'� D• C. V ,»a'� ^E ♦�^ Ny Y V �O i Yl'J p Y � L C�`• taiY. W 2 a OC C^4 Iq je U j., Cl .O '^W a, 21= V _ d (�SrI 114, yy i is Ng ou 4 e »d aZ S 2.1 '�� OEM , �ro i~ M♦ is� �1 4 •'1# W� ���< �Il; waw +'N NEW 'y.o is �s 1/ •f��rr. o F 1� �"4yN O • Ate• Y tl�'��.. •p.q y ♦a • yV a w.S 'r yp µ� � V �• N 6 y yy t`, yr $` =�•, -' e.`� w� �. .n.�` `9 �� pa �• �§.ter b�E. i itC 0 4C _Y lv. 4xi Y yy yNy V. Ci, _}� 1Y ' pL♦ 4.V. Y CO 4.v•Vir `.Y Ai qo GT v acq GM 1• yZ q�s� ia Y V♦ Y � D.qG Aye � 4Vw C 4p �` ar + d L L Y O 'q p V •r �y {e:(' -' � � !, C � � ^� es. fry ,'•�, y+� : I n i i 1 { li r j? RESOLUTION NO. 86-108 A RESOLUTION,-,OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING 'towiSSYON APPROVING THk AMENDKM TO CONDITIOit NO. 1 OF PLANhIiIS l FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13060, THE WILLIAM LYON COMPANI', LOCATED AT THE NORTWv-ST CORNER OF, MILLIKEN AVVZNU>• 40 1, THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD; q. ' WH.,- , on the 7th day of July, 1986, an amendmer.z Baas filed by The William Lyon Company, for review of the above-descrr'yed project; and WNSRUS, on the 23rd day of,July, 1986, the Rancho Cucamongs Planning $ Coamissign, held a public:-hearing to consider the above-described project. k. NOW.—THEREF(AE, the Rancho' camongai Pla;--n;ng'Co ission resolved as ' follows: SECTION 1: That the amendment tt t oriditlon No. 1 of Planning for en ,a ve Tract'"13060 shall read as: i Prior to recorcLtfk; %of .Tract 13060, ail: Cariditior,s of Approya7 applicable to and imposed upon Tentative Trac-- 13022 shall be complied with, with, the exception of oF.f-site improvements which shall be completed prior to the homeowner bcc pancy of the first unit within this Tract. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF JULY, 1986. KAXft COMMISSION O THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONaA BY: ", OWES . u a, r man { ATTEST: uraf u er, otpuzy Secretary— I, Brad Busier, ;Deputy. Secretary' of the Planning Lammissian of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and ;Adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of'Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of July, 1986, by ttm following vote-to-wit:. AYES:_ COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, MCNIEL, CHITIEA, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS. BARKER Ask .I it 39 RESOLUTION NO. r R i4 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCMONGA PL@ANING,-OMMISSION APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT NO. •13Q60 LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST•CORNER bF MILt IKEN AVENUE AND FAIRMONT LANE IN THE VICTORIA PLANNED CWWNITV WHERFAS,' on the:.`26ad day of November, 1986 a complete application was filed by The McCarthy Company for review of the above-described project; and WKREAS, on the 14th flay of January, 1987, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning C',Dnnission held a meeting to consider the above-described project. NW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucoaonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION! 1: That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed project is. cowsistent with the objectives of the General Plan;'and 2. That the proposed uke. is in, accord with the objectives of the. Development Code &'the Victoria AMC Community Plan, and tie purposes:,of the district in, which the site is lccated; and 3 - That`the propose; use is in compliance with each of >he app.lcable provisions of the Development Code, & the Victoria Community Plan; and. 4. That the proposed 'use, together witn the conditions applicable, thereto, will; not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and ck 5. That the ,)proposed subdivision design s substantially in conformance with the original Tentative %,pact as approved. SECTION 2. That Design Review for Tract 13060 is approved subject to the fo PT conditions: 1. This approval is only for the proposed site plan and building architectural submitted as part of this application. All Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract 13060 per Resolution Nos. 86-56 $8-108 shall remain applicable with this approval for,Design-Review. PLANNING COMISSION RESOLUTION NO. OR TRAcr,noo0 � mccWTHY COMPANY 3anuary 1, I983 Page 2 2. Detailed site development plans,; including, but not limited to, plot plans, 'andsacpe/iv Sation plans, fencing plans, an1_,"arcnitectural plans shall be submitted for the, review and approval of the City Planner prior to iss'irnce of any'buildinq permits, 3. Window upgrade treatments shall 'be provided on any side or reap` elevation that is exposed to view frcm any public right=of-w:y.. Plans detailing the extent of this upgrade treatment and to what lots are.,they ,Y to be applied'shail bp submitted for the review and approval of the 'City Planner prior to Assuance of building permits. 4. Ao.,'acoustical study dctailing what mitigation raeaWres, if any, are required to achieve noise=- levels, both.r exterior and interior, consistent with the City Standards for lots abutting, both the railroad right-of-way and Milliken Avenue shall be submitted for review and approval prior to the issuance of any building permits. S. Each 1,ot within the project sh0.1 have:a minimm 20 foot fiat (2S slope or less) rear yard .open area from building to, property iine`or slope/retaining wall. A final detailed site Flan which indicates the slope end retaining wail location and unit plotting shal be submitted prior to issuance of building hermits. 6. Corner side yard fencing`and/or retaining wall shai, be setba,;k a xinimum distance of 5 feet from the back of sidewalks. All retaining wails exposed to public views shall be constructed of decovtive block. Wood fencing installed by the dev�'oper and exposed to public view shall be treated with water sealant or stain. All fencing details shall be included within the landscape/irrigation plans and shall be subject to review and approval by the__Q t_v Planner prior to the issuance of ouilding permits. 7. For all corner lots, the side yard` between the sidewalk and side yard fencing shall be landscaried and irrigated by the developer. 8. Vehicular access from Wheaton Court to the railroad slope maintenance' area shall be provid:i to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the issuance of any building permits., All access easements shall be improved per the requirements of the approved landscape improvement plane, for the railroad slopes. v a u _ PLl4ftftItd6,GOipf'i SIOtdgRES0Et1TI0N NO. DR TRACrT 13060 - MCCARTOf COMPANYJanuary 14, 1987 Page 3 9." Front yard setbacks shall average 26 feet as measured from the back of sidewalk, with a minimum dimension, of 20` .feet. Variation of fr ,t, yard setbacks Sft"Ir be shown to achieve offsetsv-of +5' from the intended design average of`25 feet. 10. Per the standards of the. Community. Plan, 22 lots. shall De plotted to provide RV parking. This is to uno/bstructed se back showing gthe garage side of the house with the return fencing including-.a dou5le-sided, double swingi;ng.,gate. Details of this RY gate are to be included in the fencing program to be submitted as part of the landscape/irrigation plans. 11. On lots, other than the AV `storage lots, the houses should 'oe plotted,to'maximize the side yard on the, living side of tha house to encourage a functional and aesthetic side yard that would be,both used and t. maintained. The slide y?rd on the house side should always be larger titan the' cede yard on the garage side_with the house-side yard;acbieving a minimum of a 10 foot dimension. Ask 12. On corner lots, garages should ,op plotV�: at aj'b foot setback from the interior lot line,,to maximize the open space available on the''street,'side side of the house, and to move the driveway as far from the street intersection as possible for increased traffic safety. 13. Complete .property- fencing consistent with the standard design for the Victoria Planned Community shall be provided, by the developer. A detailed fencing plan shall be submitted as part of the landscape/irrigation plans.- 14. Corner side yard fencing constructed of a decorative masonry material is t3 be provided-for Lots 8 and 13/14. However, this fencing can be of tbe,standarO wood design used for property fencing throughout tho tract on Lots 71/72 and 82/83. 15. Drive approaches shall be designed at the minimum dimension �4w=12 feet per standard drawing no. 305) on flag lots, i.e. Lots 16, 17, 26, 27, 4116, 38, 47, and 58, and the driveway shall mlintain the,minimum . uimension of 10 feet of within t4i "flag" portion on the lot to:. maximize the amount of landscaping between lots. 13 41 PLANNING CW FSSIONWRE i1 i1TIQN No. .. OR TRACT 13Ofi0 - �ICCIIttT!!lf CQMPANY January 14, 1987 Page 4 �. s 16. Architecture:Shall be revised to sh,' the €ol ,owing:. t� , a.'" Greater tiering shall be sho►vn gn�ophe chimney cap to enrich the quality of this :design. b. On Nuse 'e1evations shgwi•ng a post-supporting a covered entry way a second z layer,,,bfanding shall, be, sla 6 on "the cal.7ars of bout, tine to'p and boiWA of the posts to;enrich the r ITty of t1li s } 17. The unit on Lot 4§ shal i b�,) of ottod so toile the garage Side;17 the *useiJ adjaWnt 0 mainta-ined•access easement' d' that'.the huu _vide of the house will then abut the house side of the house o Lot SQ- to proVide an increased-eq.4ftse of pen ;r,y space between the two lots: # ; APPROVED AND AilOPTED THIS 14TH OF JANUARY, 1987. r/ y PLANNING COMAISSION OF THE CITY !7F RANCHO��UCAMONQr�r� BY: E. a,.,`d BaKer, Chairman r� c ATTEST; :Brad u ;er, fleputy Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Plannin¢'Cgissian of "the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was, duly'and regularly-introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning commission of the City of Rancho Cuctmonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of January, 1987, by the following rota=te-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: `: ra y. A.y { — CITY OF RANCHO CUC.4MONCA Mi ST"F REPORT a '4 DATE:: °January'14, I98T, f( : W77 TO: Chairman and Members of 'she Flanning Corpissidn r FROM; Barrye R. Kansan; Senfior CivE►�gineer" AY rr� SUBJECT: ENVIRQ"OPiENTAt�ASSESSMENT rAND :TENTATIVE.=P4,1 EI MAP I0-% Cuc`air�on a ot�:`-� acres o a rota" parce s.'. n tn � oo ":Control' designationlcated,;on the< orthwesi corner of Footih�il.1 9oulevard_and Sam Diego Rvenue 40N 20T�It1I 43 Staff is requesting a continuance of this item to the' J,Wary'28,. 1987 regular- Planviing Comission'.meeting. The"'purpose is to allow staff additional time to review alternate proposals for !pan Diego Avenue. Attached is a letter from Cucamonga County Water District agreeing to the continuance (Exhibit "A°). REC"ENDATION: Staff recommends continuing this item to the January 28, 1987 3 Planning Commission meeting. s. Respectfully submitted, Barrye R. Hanson Senior CivTEng4neer ¢, BRH:dlw Attachments: Letter from the Applicant (Exhibit "A") i ITEM C ,. z ' t {l'4' "� 4 vxtiPr..ikat- "� CV '�' ' ' ROEIERF'NEIJRELi7'� .,�. f x CpC�++pp,q pp d4 ,1�l.�a�PY W A"� �9 },q-,y �`��. a«+.Y � 4e i.►6iVl1Yl �-��i■3� � IY'! C I N1iP9 ,i �F C.P1t� LLOYD�tIN1C ii4t fAN iERNAAgINO'i3q CIICAMgNgW.CALIF.SMO • A O.CIN°690 9Si.23it Druetsr `� -qRf ERS� " „ BEVERLY r RAOEN ' VICTOR A.CHERBAK,rJR:,Preddeat CiARLES S"wW.E8Y', Januam-4, 1987 City of Rancho c0;**nga Planning Commission,- P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucsiaon,a, Califo:rn :a 91730 , Re: Tentative 'Pairce .Map No. 10238,,,,. ' Commission Members: t s This, letter is to ver .f?.y that the. Cucamonga Couisty Wa.er District, agrees to a continuancli of the January 14,i�2:937 Planr ng Commis- Sion Meeting to the nelst regularly schenul1.c� meetzn a= Yours truly, �i CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT Engineering Department Supervisor . 1. i[ JBC::bf i Alk OF R I BWCHL,^U?: 1 `���iF:FCntkn L: �f r :- r, t MY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA IC M, 2p 7pf�� TKw 7��s 7��fC•��n• � G O a e � DATE: January 14, 1987 197 r`r TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Coffo ssion t FROM: Brad Buli,er, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENV�VRONt ENT;AL ARSSESMtNT AN0 TERRA VISTX PLANNED,CowU Tly err s a panne communes''�6y '2 e taol ish n �a` TM busiF�ess park 'o`verlang zone4ior arecs aesignateaaS " Office: 'Pa.^!s, Commercial' and Mixed Use, withi°n the Community Plan boundary. I. BACKGROUND: The Planning commission on Uecember 10, 1986, F con nue is proposed P7anne4.Communiiy Amendment to this regular, meeting, at the request of tti'e appi scant. 'The applicant again is, reglesting for a cbntinu`ation as. stated in the attached Letter. t II. RECOWENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue s item to the February 11, 1987 regular Planning Cootmission; meeting. Ally ted yanner BB:NF:sgr Attachment., Letter from applicant ITEM D r! e k JAK ;.�l8d�t1QlutuLlt�la�"ta�a'' �l r , ,I x January 9, 19BY FOR HAND DELIVERY u Planning Commission City of FZ4rlcho Cucamonga 4:320 Base Line Road '• Rancho Cucamonga, 'CA 91730 ~- A-ttn: �,�Nancy Flzng _ Subject(,.,-?* Terra Vista Planned CoR munity Amendment 86-02 Dear Nancy€ We are continuing our internal review of the staff report you furnished to us in December,;; We heel that we., " need more time than is available between now ,and next week'. Planning Commission meeting to complatla our analysis of the report, and we therefore request that this item be continued to the Planning G mi=lsion ,neeting Of January"29, 19r97. ' Thank you again for the detailed and courteous consideration that cu have y given to th?<, proposal, arcl for your assistance in arranging this continuance. ¢'~ Cordially, LEWIS HOMES ohn R. Melcher Vice President, Project Development' . JRM:cjc:dly7244 1156N Mountain Ave PO Box 670 Ueland.CA 91786 ' (714)985�0971 Developed by Lewis Homes D- 'ate 9 1 e e .> _CITY OF RANCHO CITCAMONGA;; F STAF REFORM z a W �. F z,. DATE; JLnuary 14, 1987 1977 TO: tha rman and Ple>9lers of the Planning Com ssion FROM: (Brad Buller;--, City:PTanner ' BTIi; ��Scott Murphy Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENYI_hQt tENTAt ASSESSMEN[ AND,, CONDITIONPI USE PERMIT,.Q6'=26 - CY7A MO-H=goques les s an,o s e�#ma sa es s o ee cas teC on i��s. 1-15 of Tract 1,2 located ate nor# es1 corner o_(Church Street and Whitneyourt fair the-.pttr a os To sat),es witl:in.Tract 12830, located on the west-si',&�,of Beryl Street, north of LaVine Street ,= APN 208-073-11, 12, 13q 14,;7and 15, I. PRWECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Re vested: Approval of an off-site model hL,%e sales ofi"ce complex ana issuance of tha Negative Declaraticn�, B. SurroundingLand.Use a`ld Zcning. or ni glee= am y rem enta'a1; Low Density:,:Wdent'taaj (2-4, acre) South Sictgle-faW,4Y'reside.tial; Lou Density Residential y, (2-4 dwell'4ng,units per acre) East -- Cucamonga Jtt,for High School; Low Density ReF!-.tial r' (2-4 &ellin ,units per acre) , :r r' West Single-family residential; LmCDensity Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) C. , General Plan Designations: Project Site=low ens Residential (2-4 duelling units per acre) t� North Law Density k.,sidential (2-4 dwelling(-*.,nits pe ',acre) Sotath Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per"aacre) East Junior High School West Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) q t ITEM E 4 PLANNI`Hf C 1SS10H 5[l�EF'REPORT CUP'86 26'r-: C TATI0 Janitiary 1 ;,' 987 , Page 2yj 11. AtSA1 PSIS• A. Back round Drt 'July lb, 186, the City unci) approved r name 193 al1cwing the establI V off-site model _ hosw sales o _,tce co plexes' s60erj to- the approval., f a Conditional Use �FdOgft.` 6rdtnan `"�#291 established cri*lria ti necessary to al�;ow ati .off-sitet hove sates office c (ex which included-but not limited t/ theyfol owing: ]�, The hours of opdraClon Shi,11 be limited from 10,00 AM to 6:00 ' On-site low level light4g shall be provf0d to insure a safe and secure envirordbent while, at the same time, preventing stray light or glare from becoming a nuisance for adjacent propertic�. E 3. The approval of the permit shalt 'be for a one ye=eti•' period. Time extensionsm���_ granted up to a maximum cf one year, or until 903 ; the,development is sold, whichever comes first. In re; active of the above, any / modal hcae sales office in exiance is_a combination of as first an on-site use, then<„s an off-site use, shall be in existance an aggegate i:!me not to exceed three years: w ` B. Gencral': The applicant is 00posing to 'j%e an existing mb$el cWlex at,,the northwest corner of Chun\\Street and Whitney Court of a purpose of home sales wfithJn_tk,t Tract on the west side of 'Beryl Street, north of LaYine SV, �t.. The existing complex consisted of five lots visible fr Heilman Avenge. The lots between Whitney, Court and Hellman Avenue have not been developed at this,time. The applicant has submitted a letter stating that these lots (1 12) will' not be developed until' there,is no Langer a need for the model comp.1 ex. The traffic-study submitted with the application states that Hellma-n Avenue, a collector street,, will not be impacted by the propolaed use. Considering the worst case scenario; the off- site complex would result in Hellman Avenue being utirized at 69% of the acceptable level of service (an increase of 2% over the current dmind). Tht Engineering Division is in agreement with the findings of the report. L J I PLANNING CO11I"S$•l'ON" " REPgRT CUP 86-26 CITATIOES 71 L Paagea 14, 187 A condition of the establishment of a model home sales office., requires that two off.-street parking spaces per model be provided within a paved lot'or by 4�her means acceptable to the Planning CoiOssion. This would require ten off-street parking spaces be provided % thin the 7imits,of the model home srl.es office. Currently, there are no of parking s',6-6s providedL, and. the applicant proposes. that visitors continue to Park in the street. Staff feels that the inter-;behind the off-street, parking requirement was to axoid conflicts between potential custo'Mirs and existing residents.. In that Lots 1-10 will not 1.,e developed until the models}complex is no longer ii necessary and the existing residence` across Church Street actually fronts onto Hellman Avenue,- staff suggests that customers will be able to park on the street without adversely impacting adjacent residents. In: the event the applicant wishes to d�jve7op Lots 1-10 prior to closing out the model complex, a condition. ha.: been added requiring; an off-street parking area prior to the issuancO of building permits for a6 of the Vots. The existing;mode! Tome-^{telex wa3 permitteion January 17, 1985, for a two year period; the pervit is due to expire on January 16, 1987. The intent of Ordinance #293 was to ensure Chet off-site model 'home sales offices were of a to ,p6 ary nature. As a result, a maximum of three yecrs was allottedfor the use.rf model complexes for on-site and off-site purposes as a rev�(t, the off-site use of the. model complex may. be ,,)erxi,'ted for one additional year. No additional extensions wzwl'd be permitted; a new Conditional Use' Permit app� cation would have to be submitted, and approved by the l;Anning Commission for additional,*use of the off-site model complex. C. Enviroraefir l Assessmek_!' The applicant hat completed Part I Or tFe Environmental Assessment. Staff has completed Part II and finds that the Conditional Use Paymit will not have a significant environmental impact and"recmwnds that a Negative Declaration be issued. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS. The following facts are providad to support e findings contained in the Red- A. The off-site model complex will not be detrimental to the health, safety and welfare, or result in any significant adverse impacts for 6ny residents. within the surrounding established neighborhood. mere are no existing residences"on Whitney Court ether tht�a the model homes. There is only ore home on the opposite 'ode of Church Street directly across'from the raGdel complex, Tk home, however, fronts onto ,Hellman Avenue. I t ; PLC; bNG,' T C ti 4— REPOO CUP "86 2G Cit4IOFx f, January, 14 1987 `t Page 4 B. Additional t.Orj�.gnnrated:by the off-sites*adel complex,will ` not have a si,gn1ff6nt impatt on surrounding developments, The =4al, coallex rf� adjacent to a coiled ar street, Hellmon Avenue, that tV,of€ su€f.Icieft capacfty to carrry the additidnal traffic while stilt ma 'ntai.ning an adegmte level of service. C. With the tecwoedded ;%ondi�ieons of Approval, sufficient on,lY site, . nff stre t parking w1lI be prov,ded so that any additional parking.. generated by 'the use will not adversely impact exi'stingy`developments. ' 01 h„r D. The individuatl eleraeirts ,of" the model hoar sales o+Fyice co�►�lex (i.e. lighting - signjY;O, fencing, hours of ;brat cn �: as - condition in, the Resoiutf� wild ensure a safe, setV and aethetit envyroriaient. ff ;> •: E. With the Coddition li�i'tI6 the off-site model c0003ex for on o year will ensure its use to be of a temporary, short-tern nature. IV. '-GGRRESPO HCE• This item.has been�,act rtised in the°Daily Report ' newspaper as a public hearing and notices tears se,�t to perty owners within 300 feet of the protect sit-. V. REMMENDATION• Staff reemmends that tho ','Planning Commission, approve Conditional Use Permit 86-26' througk adeption of the attached Resolution and issue a-MegatIvA Declaration. Respectfully sub►ittc,4,', Bra Buj '✓ City Planner BB:SM:vc Attgch►nents: Exhibit 'A" - Location Rap Exhibit "B" - Site Phan ',Exhibit "Co Lettar'frore Applicant ' Exhibit "D" - Traffic Studjt 1 ♦/t<ti wowiaw air ■ rry■ #4��+1�xr R�Bl10+l�� ltllt� l�l�� il�1HH ��11tt�1flt��� a ago �tR4Mk�IFN Ill Okii �Jw�cy�r�a�tx�w ,- a-rAss#� .. �.eJka .r•. �IIfi lIiNRfsl ar+raall '�• P % i#t/���`�a�'e�e ra'{�t rr ,P��� aa +� ll I I Z1i+�rregtrtago +[+��tl� f1M1t�lt�tt J ,�+.Irnri.. � xr.� av v��pl. WP ca y aR1Pa: Nl1tk1�ltRtti� �� �► �. '� �'�aU r�� �e�a '��tktt,lt11.1#1tt1.;. m. our Ott "" ttt<tttittN�#Itt ;. j{i YAM Yla p* 16 pit ZZ 1��`��y ..SIII,OanjY lty M 1 " ,ia.,.. w,r�h'�i al ow r. .� lug ,w.. AN J� was dwor, it MLR, IN flu llRrf •��� '� ram.'�w�.�iw� � 4��O��RLL�t� tE �1tlHlta s+ fit liM rR'Cii�i1�R/�i�ttltliLl �N�� Att "`1'♦ �`KtttRlNow** M RRR i at*m win Li�NLi� tfM�tltH� � .""a . Ar�'as�w wM1t'r'�► �KMED— #N NOW all Mwmt � ■1�`rrr� .>wwtR �" iMYillii r�rr+rt +rlrri. Illn Ufalow �. LtLt y » 4t Sm mow.:ar � s r>•r aY •r. .Now ! ■IIIL i�rr ' ,Til,'r �'� t n.erteaaN�rwt RHt�i�,� Rite ,ram �s S •.�'� < Ce .�.+ C� 1a -959 .Bp fp J ' J ANIS }a .mow, i -�_.��'•'�.•. � � ',• `/M ' CITY 011' rrE.\I- +: ► ;,-. RA.I`CTO CLTt..AaMONGA TI'I'I.•g: PLA gNli\G OrVISf x t y 3l t IN"LVD.,Suits. 20I,TUSTft CA 92680!T Si 014f r: October 3> m6 u Brad BOler City P]anner�;,. City of Rancto Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 - Rancho Cuc ong&" CA 91730 { j1'1 REF, C.U.P. for off,-site mWel names'` Dear Brad. Pursuant-to the recent-change in development code section IL04.0709 we are hdhewith sulkoitt'igg)a C.U.P. application tw utilize an'existing.' model com';*Uod for e off-site tract:12830. ' ` I have encLl:,_.5ed a:capy of,the approved:use permit for the existing'niode1 { compourd Yn track 12238. Please note.we have on i�4o43t a $2.d00 cash �> dnpos-A til restore the sales offiGe to a garage. Add. ; if,, I have e�Clpsed an analysis"from our Traffic engineers why _1cates no burden on existing homes to tract 12239. .sake note that no tomes will be bu�lit on lots 1`» 1'� of 12238 until is no further need for thp,gales office on Nhitnty,Coat: This should raamove "o i!-site" parks-',_is an iss4e. as.':were is the anti e cul-de-sac of Whi`Opy tQ park sales office vir�t--rs. ;' Please infom. me if the application requfr,-.j`additional 10brmation. F� Sincerely, c. C 'A�ION BUILDERS. a partnership f Y F. G. Linton, r. r Development Ma alter I i " F6L�ir;sf BncioSares i y T=enspOA tation Pisnning r Trsffic Engsneerin� ' _- August 28, 1906 2%:. Jzrry Lints CitPat bon Buildars 177V, Irvine Boulevard,' #205 Tustin, CA,S2680 Dear Mr. Linton: This letter report addresses the traffic impact of the °oft Site Model Kom2 CoAPlex" on Whitney Court. The mode,l hors sales offs �s for dit�ttiy�s Domes located i norf h of 'the "les ofoce approximately' X.5 miles. whi'iney Court is a s?i, t cul-de-sac street k,j ust west oZ Helluian Avisme. 2t teas's into Church Street from the north. The only. homes curkently ;on Whitney`Court are the-:miidel b�jzen. No one lives on Whitsay Court On Church StrrAt, from where Whitney.;Court intersects it to whare 'Church Street intersects l zilmar Avenue, there is ' one residential 'dkalling .'ri the south side of Church Street which sides onto Church Street and fronts onto Hellman,Avenue. According to City of Rancho Cucamonga, existing 'traffic volumes on Church Street wrest of Hall Frr-� avenue arc, 2,500 vehicles per day, and existing yr ` _�s on Hallman 1 Avenue in tha vicinity of Church Street are 8,00d vrshicles per day. Hellman Avenue and Church Street u s both construcved ail approximately 44 foot curb to curb:str�B}e. In th-o casie of Church Strest, i.t is striped as a`tiro lane road without left turn pockets. In the -,aria of Hellman Avenue, it is striped as a two lanes road with left turn pockets. The capacity of a :'wo lane road without left turn pockets is generally considered to be 8,000 to 10,000 vehicles per day at Level of Service d, and the maximum capacity is 20 percent or more above the 8,000 to 10,13Ao 46B4 Gerrenon Parkway o Irvine, 52714 u C7141 559-,g .31 r 717 r vehioi a ear day range,.. F:tr the' purpose of this ` `aral7s.is; "Level oP Service' C capacity will be assumed to be 8;OM vahidjio"per day-, for Church Street. 4 Isla Capacity+ of -,a tw,a-,,Zana boAd`with latr� ed l3tt tsz�n, poc9a� ,s iB,deberall� considered to lv1 12,,000, to-15 gym; f vehicles per day,at Levey of Service C, and. the.=ximum aapacity,;;•_! n,, p,�rcar�t or mare--ahovA tjie 12,000 to 35,660 vsi i par day. For trhis"a3iii1ysis, LW. al of Service C capacity for #tllman A.-venue vill be assumed to be 12,00.0 vehicj.as per"day.: {, , To calculate.tt a tra"ffid impacti; traffic:ger;®ration hips x been vatimsted .at` tf;;o,leve3.sz beat estimate,and,"worst case. ;, The *or"' aside is three times thrx beet eistimate r volumes. 4 ;n a daily basis-"it' 3a ". +stinatad that-the project will generate the tollowing•voluxeh: Waekd:;� - 24 yell"clan per day Day 1?0 vehiclem per day Worat Mizate $° We6kday 60 vehicl4,,� per day E Weekeind Day =30i;vehicles per day When the worst case weekend "ay vok,�mes are added to t14 existing daily volumes, tb4 reaulting.,volumes and volume-to-capacity ratios are as gallows Church aoiaman Dsaceiutor Street Rvenuaa Daily vo.iumW 2,500 8,000 Level of Service C capacity 81000 12,000 Volume-to-Capacity,aatic 0.31 0.67 Existing ±,Model . Daily volums 2,800 8,300 Level of Service C i Capacity l+ 8,000 12,000 volume-to-Capacity Ratio 0.35 0 69 1 a r From the nbol*,information it can be concluded that moth Church stroit74nd Hellman Avenue now e0i-hate,and will continlie to, operate. At bet-ter than'tevA of Se--Vice C. e f The 'resposed Vo el home couplex will add very little �l traf 3c, percentageNise, to either:,Church, Street o-V 1 Hallman livellue. ,I xt has been a pleasure preparing,this information for you. if there are any questions, or if we can ba of th furer assistance, p'laass do not hesitate to,call. Sincsrel� - i MMZMA2q AS$OCIP.TEES William, Kunzman F.F.. #loot �J ir i t � ``RESOLUTLON NO'. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO UCN6GA �LANNIKG C"ISSION .. APPROVING:.CONDITION&+ USE PERMIT NO. 66-26 FOR AN OFF- SITE ,740DEL HOMES"SALES COMPLEX`LICATED AT THE NORTHWEST , CORNER OF .CHURCH .STPEET' 'AND WHITNEY COURT IN THE LOW ;. RENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT { } h'NEREAS, on V* 22and OW of October, ,1986, a complete application ' was filed by;CITATICN BUILDERS Tor review of tfi6 above-describedp project; and UHEREAS; on: the loth days of December, 1986 t5e Rancho Cucamonga Planning Cmfssion held a public hearing to consider the above-described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resoli, d ors SECCTION I; That the follovin5" findin s can be met: f 9 1, Tiat the proposed is in accord with the General P Plan, the objectives of tho Development,Cade, Nand the purposes of the district in which the si tz is bated. 2. That the proposed use,: together with the conditions ` applicable theref,o, wiYl not be detrimenttm to the public health, safety; or, welfarb; ;er materially i►rjurious to properties,"br improvemenyT in the r vicinity. 3. That 1;ta proposed ;use complies with ea0 of the appliiab a pravi-ions of the Development Cade. 4. That the model home sales office is cmVatible with and .aensitfve to the imaidiate environment of the site and neighborhood, an`d'that its location will not be detrimental to the health, safety or walfare_ or result in any sighificant adverse masts for ary residents within the surrounding established neighborhood. x S. That the location of the riodoi home sates office is adjacent to a primary circq.taVon route (collector, secondary, or arterial) so that any additional traffic generated as a result of this project: will not have any signifirxnt irilpac, for the surrounding development. To :nscare than; any traffic fmpacts associated, with the tstablishment of a madE:l home sales office are mfn%ized, it will be;required that concurrent with any appplication for a ConvltlonaiAlk ff . I ram' r � � �, ���sc+. - PLAlJNIsNC C0�11SS1¢ RE,5 IYIr.� N0 C-UP 86 26 C3'TATIi�f#' December 10,-19$C a t Else Permit for„3n�off-si to-,zoodeljj�rhoma sales ofi,tJce, .�,�at the applicant�413 also inc ude'�ta trqfic i4udy t<}` be prepared by,, a certifie� traffic engineer `,etailing MT poentYal traffic- fin►pacts Qx acted to result fr , ;:the r `ect and r asi an ;. P a3 • p.ap ng y Required t r_ ftrgatior1,,j)measu0s that woux be necessary to EF reduce .an treiG iais to the surr Wndi,ng C,;tablished neighborhoq,#. 6. That ,.sufficient„ on itu off-street parking is available m that' any, additional park$.ng demand -;r generitp4 a�'"a result of this project would not have any Significant adverse PMPActs ;for the surrounding '` deve3 opent 7. That the individual elements of the model homes sales office;,, i.e a Tightiry,. sitgrefng, fencing, hc�rs of operation, are desigre�t in a collective, ? cBord of manner to ensure :ajj .safe, secures and aesthetic environment, sensitive to and compatible ` with she surrounding; development.! 4 s a. That the) ikidel hot* sales office is to be ^F a tE orary, short-term nature; short tern[ is defined as -Aving'a life ekoectancy!not-to exceed two years. SECTION 2 That this project will not create adverse impacts on the ; envirow-H-Wan-FWat a Negative Declaration is isss.on on December,10, 1986. : SECTION 3: That Conditional lase Permit No. 862u is;appraved subject tome 5 Mdng conditions: 1. An off4i a parking 6,�t containip9 eight spices a° .hall be provided within the confines of the model h0te complex p',or tp the issuance of building permits for any residence on tots;l-lO: 2. Adequate or-site lighting shill be provided. A detailed Iighting Olan shall brw,submitted for review and approval, of the. City 'Planner within 30 days, The lid`rting shall be installed within 60 days from 711 the date of the approved trim 3. The hours of operation for "the model hors.complex shall be limited from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p:�r. daily, z j P�ANtdIPd{a�CQ2+4!lI>, I �SOLUTION 1t0�, '' -"� CilP December 2®, I985 Pege 3 �� a? k�, The Conditional Use Permit shall `eXpfre"on �nuary � 26 1988; .vequasts for >extension o `this Gohditiotai U�:e Permit beyond the ttto years, would requiVeL the opl-fcation of a, new,=Coti::itfonel Use. . Permit, . Irrbspect:ee of the above, amy d€3�?iosse sai.es 'office =in existence as a ;stapi saitiion 'off_ as first,drool :e use, than-as,,an .off-Site-uSa, -sii'll be In existence an aggro ate total time not` to r excei:d=th""PLO yeajs—1 _l APPROVED AM ADOPTED THIS 143t# tY''i1F JANi3ARY, 1467. PLANNING COWISSION Of THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAWW ;.) BY: E.TAM_ar .er. a ► an -- :. ATTEST: Brad1er epu cry ry 5, I, Brad Buller, Dephty Secr1L of the Planning Ctricz on;of the City of ' Rancho Cucaasonga, do hereby certify'that the foregoing-Resolution was duly;and regularly introduced, passo,l, and adcptc�-by the Pinnnfng Ccxmi.ssfon of 'the City of Rancho Cucamonga, aC,a regular meeting of the 0 'tidnp1pq Coi"issionitiel;! w on the I4th &y of January,-1987 by the following vote-toy '4; k AYES: CEkit+tiz ONERS: " NOES:_ Coiw lssiOmS: 96SENT: COWISSIONER!Ri } 1 I CITY OF RA"`,DHO CUCAMONCU c ICASTAFF REPORT hro�, 9 � C 0 Z ,. U ' DATE: January 14, 1987 t977 TO Chairrsa.n an,. Members of the P1annfng Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Chris tdestman, Assistant'Planner i r. " SUBJECT: `/ARIA`NC6�LS-0-07 - M0BERG- " I. BACKGROUND: On December 10, 1986 the applicant, Barbara Ann Moberg,cam before the Planning Commission With a variance request to reduce the number of parking spaces required for a food Y establfshment. The number of required spaces for the 1200 square foot yogurt shop is 12 bssed on one (1) space per 100 square feet. However, based on present and future building square' ' s footages and e-cistiog uses in the center, only eight (8) parking spaces are available for the subject 1200 square feet. , At that<' 4� Planning Commission ;�:ting of December 10, staff was directed to confer w' the.applicant and consider alternatives to the proposal p° as submittal. J i A letter was submitted to the Planning Division stating opposition to the, approval of Variance 86-07 by Ronald D—Taylor of Taylormade Yogut located to the west of Archibald in the Alpha Beta shopping center. The following concerns are raised with thti proposed variance. Mr. Taylor's letter isr,zttached (See Exhibit F). 1. The number of larking spaFcer .required fora= 4ived in, tak,, home clientele:. W. Taylor cites the American Entrepreneur Association- Business Manual #79 to support his contention that yogurt shop patrons will use their cars rather than walk, thereby making use of all the required parking spaces, 2. The quick turnaround' of yogurt customers could exacerbate traffic congestion in the center. II. ANALYSIS: There arc- no specific references to yogurt shops in a evelopment Cbde. Therefore, an interpretation basedf on the best related outlined use was used to de'termioe the category by which the,shop should' be regulated, 'fhe best related use was Restaurant. The Devclopment rode definition of - restaurant is.'use providing preparation and retail 49 ITEM F - PLANNTh4'GOM�II°SSI'Ok STArF REPORT f VARIANCE $6 T January.14, 1987 age 2 '�� , sales of food � d:`beverage�.f ,. ns ,i-Rcluiing, cafEs= .coffee shops, sandwich ops, ice cream p_A-ors, and similar uses.,.". h Thereforz, staffs s gna on :o the- yogurt shop as a„ restaurant was determined by itS similarliy .to an ice cream shop and the necessity of providing sq--tng• Measures discLissed by,, the appli:ant and staff which may.:, mitigate the, impact of the yogurt shop' and its parkinq> j requirements 'on the center were: Limiting ,the number of the items on the menu. e seats to be allowed in the store, -and limiting the nature of Seating: �I The applicant states that in this case the ideal number of -# seats with counter and or tables for an economically successful shop is 20. On the original'applicatiin, due to an oversight on the part of the applicant;=-there was a request for 16 seats. I After discussing limitations on seating, the Fminimm number of seats acceptable to Ms. Moberg is 12. Staff's position is that, should a reduction in seating be i found acceptable by the Commission, seating should be limiteO�` to a wximum of 8.r The complete elimination of table seating and the provision for wanting seats only would be tNi most acceptable- solation, It is staff's opinion that with a complete iNO nation of seating, the yogurt shop would be more in confatmarce with a general retail .classification and would theref4ee have a lowee parking'ratit requirement of one space per 250 square feet vs. one space p: r 100 square feet. Menu.Limitation: The applicant and staff are in genere'l agreement that the menu could be limited strictly to yogurt and minor food items that would compliment the yogurt. Attached is a preliminary menu :that could be typical. (See Exhibit E) III. ..LZ!VAS OF_£ONSIDERATION: Fz:tors of consideration for a Variance as noted in the #development Cade are: 1, Special Circumstances a. Is the property unique with respect to size, shape, or topography. x 17 LAN), GDiiISsF STR'FF'itEPO�tT . ^ ° VYAi2,lNGE [nary Page b. Are there exceptional ci rcumstances C ;) appi icable to the property or proposed ' use. 2. Preservati6W or Property RI h Hat,`.ashi f a.. Can J,easonabla use be madet/of property " tri'thot this Variance. b. _ Without this �ariance, isJ/the applicant denied priviloes eijoyec by owners' of other propertie4Yin; the saie zone:* c. Is the hardship 'created beyond the (J control of the applicanG.>or wu.s it self— Others'' a. Will the Varfai'ice be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare. x b. WI-11 the 5'�artting of, this Variance be a spa cia l prfvilege inconsistent with the i .' limitatiens nn other),properties in the, same zone. IV. FACTS..-FOR KMOINGS. Before g 4nting a Varj;ance, the Planning aU ss on t"sTmma th following findings. A. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difilca!A.— innecesrary physical hardship inconsistent 4h the7objectives of this code. ! l B. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or co�.iitions applicable to the property involved or to the,, intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. r C. At strict or literli interpretation in enforcement of th€ specified regulation would deprive the applicant of t privileges en3oyed by owners of other properties iu the C sable zone, i f � a PLANNING, tl1I+SSI01 STAFF`REPORT VARIANCE 86-07 Jannary,44, 1987 page 4 ^ ' D. 'That t7he granting of the variance-will knot constitute a grant of special ;privilege inconsistent with the limitations on othey#� properties classified in the same zone. E. That t;tie granting of the.W4;riance will not be detrimentsi` :fI to public health, 'sayf '� or welfare or materially i incurious to propertied 6 ;improvements in the vici,,i.ity. I = , r; f 1 V. CORRESPONDENCE: i`.. Notice of,Public raring has been- posted on the subject site. ' VI. RECOMMENOATIOU: Staff recoWAends that Jthe Planning Cowniission deny the Variance request, howevee should the Planning Commission find the reduction in seating and,-the limiting of,;menu iteas adequate measures to reduce w elimiti,. to the parking deficit, a Resolution of Approval with conditions has been provided. ;. Res lly sybmt h Br 11 r r City planner ` BB:CW.-e Attachments: Letter, of Justification Letter, from Sycamore Springs Manager Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B` Site Plan Exhibit "C" User Location Exhibit "D" - Tenant Improvement plan Exhibit "Ek— Typical Proposed Menu Exhibit "F" Letter of Opposition Exhibit "G" Draft Planning Comni'ssion Minutes from December ICY, 1986 Resolution of Denial Resolution of Approval with Cqt tions I Y !o-erg 01 2 bar'' � B7-vd 6� r 0 Be. am 0 !� h 9 3630 And les, � sOS13� s5 ? c feel 1 op• t S F,roZen `r s Zen Yogas�1 ing orient•. Corcerr► m'J Fra g of re', strian the Trf Gm Ix' 2.Y var'•i7f�Ceact'&1 ngt j -the-`r c�+�ired�vsd ` a Paj giV4 to th h• dent s .sp wow d n. t 3 s va=l aesting rent•• ces at of Pex ag, I tasz�ing tal�en S a9 r his is ee csxc�� 11abl a pEY°ent lent U °n o� g orders are w°Ul`" n� � Bement ° th eat ss °°n - ,.� 35° s a or tPleo.all of i oxim}� o yddi�i t+ a ber t+ den t et►f°slioP as �`� ss apr t rsz` Sri ixmediA the n, a oduc 't�TLng mY t busimnutss Ces Webs�B'to th�o reduce d..coa °' en Yc�out 3ing spa sgrvsvlo d at e- -melts t1n•' �t Y t ber of Pa%g -end+ t�lis a u' Y st e a l Inure ver t° to 80' the 11 g of oh•°r C�1 ,*ogurt ,Zed 00 not mor out• ach e$ e reduce a fre a 5esnb Frpzen t, c•?ns`a vIthsn g V.81 t of m servlC of f�ri�$odate thggded• If no and tit, th `d V,qun na a3 to coomspsoeszox, smote, clients, door` -Maressad as th• o+ Bing. frd s its in the an the er re traff . per` to its a turn ,k re,,ith fulth- trian ay due stor , tfiey wlth so 3,j and to Pb des tban normel rage s moat► store gem • er Of iente larg tud• from equil fast ou .uc gibe or Creatg a' last ati dense• sides Witllitate t onlY de,. 1t w l the P•de ho Ising ter on two Senior5 fa a. was no ].ocatiO gupP°rt •Fe area •the Gen a large e'Y'• t m Center of Its W11i eiia• at hug strcat event' the e ,hopping of tune 3i en hick��tile t s rO o tile s e eve s GomP e% t+ Th so Y traf ts• , A -tb to butoun.t °f„ �Iencg °oTe Sprsntehlnd that a g ac°• atA The ggstaur yeasts f am th ca7-06 the '`'YG�d3rgrt Y north of woule g joca Table pant of i" c1 'heal a are a Pad; dir•`.,y ley-, from th Boun hQ a m�t east GO�P 187.6 aPar e3s wil ba x r g o{n th• cthe enter• event -for ap4 hgr large bush be pi.B'Jiago ;tor � �g r44e built for+, ..atorl�' atom•rs W5.11 i anA thgnter• to tO ro r. rli meat code Of my titan sa1'on, the cis accdaoda tag• of _ „ 1 oP space entlrelY tY.2 sun driasnki have to to s9uOxe f d a.gt the �°uVit � in �' 11 be - Would the would actua would wi onlY °Pt d b. to a entire rot of f Q c tian93 gbec used c'e�' aY 1t The sh°4 w so that the would the add ad not owgil to a at u mY.�Sing Dc1ng 4 is bt—86Uter* and wo not be n1 the 1�'.as Par el for mY ar b the cen denig. I rd st1P vqte aries�e 1 not °nl d1 ferent P laac►e�� 1R • landlebte3n a that wler service iness:� co�,d not t shop cu9tomhom• last . P t L 1,go%en Yog ur5..,gObu�1Y aer +iaan If th ogur lgd if Fro%enbe cancaI h qu 36itY a the v0stoaesE, of d hotaeo`m Would sting a hig but ha 1n the P iwLt an 4 oh erea l plegsing• I As A m �iviltl` be aesths the bg t aP�a�•l°t sucf'ss � R °n°C Cre t and `o sldez a 's+ to hey you tar Volt /f rya �w@ � 11 MI k IL pcteler 23,,J986 Barbara V4)exg & Ken VICKee 3636 Ism Li t d, 01201 los Angeles, Ck 96666 I To it Vey Concern: Sycamore Springs.t's a r240-unit a*irtznent ar Vlex aa;,eoent to the'' j _' -center�'t 72Q1,Arch bald Avenue The cleat Cnt3des access to cVsi`ier via i3,01oet path,th lnrayr axxl�t fin the develorrent ct ti��center to be a plus gar our.residez�+„s'as #W _ can, and do,use t122 d CeSS paths S UC" �:y tQ visit, `�AL411SE in tiie<center The apen3n .vf new bas%ness in the ter is an y added convenf,ince for our residents. We do rsfez ne�residents to the vari-w4 mo sses for}theii dxTpirg convenience and�� find the £e i0=ck f=r,both-cnrrent and-prospe&ti've residents ;:o lie VMY j gsitive a6,each rew shop opens W. Sincerely ' w Knee Paladri TM iager Spriry4s Scott Marageent Company t i, i 7127 Archibald+Rwtp ho Cucamonga,California 8i730+714IV8g-7866 t 0701�0� :; �-�� �� P� A,g�;�ndya �,. " Y�S A `•r k M• "rltl3t _ -i c k wY. w K a Mok l r o � s • • ��L1,C! t.�I rrL��,�•t �m.es��ssY�P. 31. Z8iL'70SED s 60' ee,arr,'n •-_�- Gam' • �,. e< mr.aa•+e fir•-- i:,,.,�i;''yam .�cm.r �o�Tnw wsGr► `�"�,, ` mm r �j '' '�525'L{.,ougs�T►.r®Gw+6tw eAw,.acu. aveur.,.ur -_ ��:Mri+•rr AgEo�IT�GT A.4A.IKG� e�.� a �4 r,�.p 2a. •�wt�.R.'°• a 1 ....• 'r:® �. rl.rYn�Ar 9 �P"-'O2402-73/-iz sir . r<a rr —4- AML _ AVAILABLE RAN CHO POSTAI_ CEV AVAILABLE t i � FT.�.`•1'� t 7�� �I� `fir. 40. AVAILABLE E 1200 w u - GIFTS FOR LESS g Ans-- S ROUND TABLE PIZZA ,; lit- YOGURT o (t 4 e ?r TANNING SALON ° _ t. BARBER SHOP < ME-0 FLICKS tit Auk +W, irt� R eta L z (^; f � t �• aINA „ al it- `HIV 02 jTj .ti �'✓ b '47 a n�� { r � zIS �.,. Wi :x I Z 7 Vl Z r l 7 v .:a x +' rrOxon Yogurt �:- Assorted, Yager t Tapp Tigs Beklvq'ies , Brovnnies Frozen Yogyrt Pies Waffle Oomps Yogurt on Maffl',es 4 VAR 85-07 MiIBIT "V' F— 13 !Y' DEC - December 18, 1985 City of Mancha, Cucamonga , Planning Commission ASP!€: Brad Buller, City Planner BUBUM VARIANCE 86-OT-MOBERG, December 10, 1986 REBG TAL TO MOBERGI Letter of iustgf%tion (No date an letter). The following rebuttal comments are addrewed to Ms. Moberg's letter requesting a Variance. Beferenem"ll FACTORS OF CONSIDERA71ON: 1. Special f Circumstances": l 1. Ms. Mebera's letter alludes to a "oedestrimi oriented designP Rebuttal: There simply is no such, thing as a "pedestrian oriented design"..' How could it be poss:blr.. to des,gn a restaurant that appeals to foot ;traffic? Contrary to the Moberg myth - Ws. Moberg etuinot change c:lent habitsl The yogurt 8110p pulls 86-1% W& IIIAIUK 0 Menu al i5fiil of Its business from a "drive-in-take homey clientele. Hoeg Ms. Moberg plan to buck her own customers preference and make her clientele walk in, rathm, than drive-in* Ms. Moberg cannot successfully change what the public buying habits have proven to be. 2. "Aecommodate the Senior CitIzerP WD°1"TTALs Unfortunately it is a proven fact that only 1 1/2 to 3% of a yogurt shop's ellentele are from the Senior Citizen group. Ms„ Moberg errs ifs'be plarm to accommodate Senior Citizens—and glace the number of parking spaces neaded" * Young married families are tiff buy yogmt, not Senior Citizens. Apparently, Ms. Moberg is unaware from where her sales would come. C011HIiiERrs Previou to snoving to Rancho Cucamonga, I was owner of Appletree Advertising Agency in Orange County. I have over 25 years experience in the field and am a C.B.C. (Certified Business Communicator). This means I passed a national teat covering knowledge of the seven areas of the advertising field. Only 1,100 Wviddals have been privileged to pass this test stnee its beginning in 1976. So I believe I am qualified to make the following comments; In order to facilitate Ms. Moberg's chjRm a of her client's guying habits, ie: "pedestrian oriented traffic" and aceomodate the Senior Citizen, it would necessitate a massive advertising eampaigsi. She would have to estimate the area around her ,atop with a "opinion changing" campaign. Her budget would Qtert at $250,000 up. A successfua, campaign would take at least nine month before results could be measured. After 12 months, she could expect only a 2% to 7% change in fits.* prospective clients habits. Could Ms. Moberg possibly plan such an expenditure to change established buying habits from f3.7 to, at best, T9.T? The , •a answer is 4TIOM. 0" S. Mabet� letter due trim tat *i want to he4� create a and mkt a suyeessful e�mmmaorr BM TTrAu Skeesrtiful egmmuniUw are where wonforcemeta d reguU'llone we °..., appltad equsu fie,;all. Ids. Mowrff should be the last n to ask,top a curie ' 'designed far the Ptenefit-:Df all lUtie 66mmurdi y," to Pe,changed fir hei,alone? supporter of a,sleecassfas7 1ae►mnf A s " enmity aMUM be the first person to�amspeet and, " obaerve the City kWas as:it� applies.to her. , G'tSl'IUMM As a 'true stippoter,of a sucessaful eommunity, I epee denim. a „ latation at 11977 I!ootbll 'Sk.,, l�04ing -C" because of °lack! of p6king "oeOl I rospectecl, the, city. twde, md,tossed another laeeition, without eeliissg for s Variance r"Al*'X respected tbs`code and tea;wanted to help''create and Support a successful 6r mmunity. As a garid el"Zon, I did not es* for s 'Lelal e t tsriyilettea nor for an o*eltren" to.to "A asiale toe Iry beefm ` Panther,. the Moberg letter states:, ",.."ders...tak�; aboUt�'4eve `minutes to I turn around, as a result, that would reds erne the number of f E spaces needed" BIe On the aontrary, the resu:t of R tTrft minute tven-esoIaid`would exert to in and cut traffic, not reduceOpark q spaces neede t moo, suety quick turn-around time would add I.*—gaffie ian_, at an already congr tted area, and would not reduce conr4iiut atxi parking places meded, as Ohe contends. ka eoncl%Uon, I believe the Planning Commission reeemsnenditUfn to deny the Variance request by Ms. Moberg is totslty jusfiified and noth4 said in hate latter can justify a variance. .granting of at l►wriwwe to lw wmild clearly be the granting-of a 1MISI privilm and would be Ineonsi tent wittl litaltatiew placed on oUlAr woe by bushx4ses in the same soste. • 3in ly, r Ronald D. Tayl,,. 9664 Sasaeli'Ye �Rd. RDT/jO Rancho ICuct m'onga, CA 91.730 I 1 t i 1, Q. CONDITIQkAC.AU -i'ER�iIT 86-26 - CITATION - it request J establish an off site 66 1 horse $a, office c `lex on 10�' omr to i1-15�r bract 12238 located at the'nertheast co`,Me of Church Strdot`and Iifr'�i�y�Court for Ithe purpose of tat salet rrrithin,Tract 22830, 100ted of tl* west side of#Beryl street, ` north of.i aVine_8tr-"t - APH 208-073-At 12, 13,14 and 16, aq�� qL, ^Y Chairman Barker announced that the Planning 40r,wCssion was in receipt of a lettor froi,,tahe appticaht° or this item.re ,,,a continuance of -the public hearing to January 14., 198L He ow red t1w) public hearing. 'Mere ",re no roOklents. !lotion: Moved by` Tolstoy, seconded by Chitiea, unanimously carried, to continule Conditi.00at Use Permit i6.26 -to the January 1 'x981` Planning :p Co►wission meeti,igl. R. VARIANCE 86-07 - A requast. to reduce the number of parking spacee `" ,red for a food establishs+ent in a developed shol4ting, center rin the Neignbarhood'Commercial District (RC) located at lthe norvheast corner of Archibald and Base Line - AM 22:731-12 Chris; Westman, Assistant Planner, joresented the staff report. Chairtan Barker opened the public hearing. ry ;r Barbara Motierg,, 3630 Barham\B d*t6i gave an ov€i view of the request. 1 Corissi oner Chitiea asked the ppropose� `seating capacity for the yogurt shop. Ms. Moberg advised that there 'alld bet two tables with four chairs each and two counters with four chairs each. Jan Krause, representing Sycamore Investments the developer and Omer of the r prOerty, advised that the lease for this center contains a clause that gives the landlord the right to institute employee and tenant parking, which requires employees to park ft designated ar."s'. She felt this uWe would be at! the low, end of the continum fitting into the restaur&at classification. t , Rick Nelson, adjacent property owners, stated that the notification sign for this project contained no dater for this meeting. He did not feel this use would pose a parking problem for this-center. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that staff would have to check the notification sign. He pointed out that the item had been advertised in .the newspaper and property owers within 300 feet of the project were notified by mail. He farther stated that the posting of the public hearing sign is merely in addition to these required notices. Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney, advised that it seems the City goes out of r its WAY to provide every fora if public notice par �tbie and as legally required. He advised that any one of the advertising:-means would ,be { sufficient to satisfy legal requirements for conducting a hearing. There were no further cbments, therefore the public hdgriog was closed. C*ssioner McNial concurred that the yogurt shop at this point in time would got present a problem; h:f ver, was concerned 'that there iw.V be,problems when. 4 the e ;er face stores am°gs leased. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that t*r had spoken with business owers in the J center who indicated that they hsve not experienced.isany pai!king pm'Mems.. He .. supported the variance;j request. , Commissioner CMea didn't set a yogurt shop as a�,typir'al;restiatilhant use a:Yd j didn't believe that the si:rict restaurant sta`a should apjily to this {: pa►•ticular use. She pcintei@ out. that the protect prtArides an extensive ` outside eating area which she felt would be utilized by the patrons of the t yogurt shop. I Commissioner ','A%r was concerned that there;was no technical means, available 't to classify.d yogurt shop as any thing but a restaurant. He stated that if the crest of the Comaartssioners are, inclined to approve the variance, he would recommend certain conditions be placed which would in:;u& inhibitloo of selling any other Types of food and limiting the amount of seating available within the establisi went. I � j� Mr. Buller advised that a Resolution Of Approval had not been provided for the Co=issiON therefore, should the Cowtsxion be lean►*O toward approval, staff would nee, tG�prepare,'- Resolution provide the facts to cake the findings 6 necessary for approval, ',,`\,suggested that the it!* be continued to allow staff to �With the applicant. Chairman Barker reopened the public hearing. l Bober i concurred w3`�h the continuance of the public hearing. !lotion: Moved by Tolstay, seconded by WRiexl, to continue V*rianc* W-07 to the January 14, 1987 planning Caewaission Ming. S?ttff wss d°rectsd to meet With 4,plicant in attapt to find solutions within the paraftt,rs given tf design€:ting parking spaces, providing alto-ma"tivas for the tisdt 1o.. %an the amount of seating or possible elioination of seating and prohibiting any fg other types of food being, served other_that Yogurt,. Chairoan Barker announced that the following itm were related and%veld be ' hemrd comunlcntly by -Va Comission: S. ENVF Al ASS AND PACE- t 10037 - S. c. E. DEV pMUT J COMPANY INC. - A division of 1$.55 acres into 10 parcels within the I Industrial Park District (Subarea 71 located between mite flak Avenue., Eucalyptus Street and Elan Avenue - Apt! 208-351-29. Related project. DR U-23 (Ite n Ti RESOLUTION,NQ. y A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING 'CO MISSION OF THE Cl'r'Y OF RANCHO CUCAE,dONGA, DENYING, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, A REQUEST FOR THE APPRQV�: OF V013ANCE 86-07, TO AlLOW,A REPI-CTION IN THE NUMBERI"OF REQUIRED PARKING SP,i`AES, FOR k FOOD ' ESTABLISHMENT 'N A DEVELOPED SHOPPING CENTER LOCAltO AT 7201 ARCHIBALD AVENUE, ..#11, LOCATED AT THE R'(HEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBAID AVENUE AND BASE LINE ROAD - AP)R 02- 731-12, WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKING FlkarNGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. ( ) Barbara Ann Moberg has'-filed an application for the approval of Variance 86-07, (ii) On November 19, 1986, the application was reviewed by the is Planning cnd Engineering staff. (Iill) The subject site is, in a Neighborhood Commerotal District. (iv) Upon analysis of the appli�itian it was determined that the shopping center was developed at a parking ratio of one spaile per 250 square feet of leasable area. A minimum of 202 parking spaces were required; however 226 parking spaces were provided. The approval of a yogurt.shop restaurant, wh:zh requires one parking space per 100 square feet of gross building area in the center, reduced the total nuwher of surplus parking spares to three (3). As a restaurant, the 1,200 squarre foot yogurt seop is required to have 12 parking spaces however, there are only eight (8) spaces available. Ther eftre, the Variance re ests a reduction in the required number o spaces from twelve to eight, creating a`deficit of"fourr spaces. f narking t t (v) The applicant contends that because of the pedestrian oriented design of the center and the proximity of three apairtment complexes to the center that the yogurt shop patrons Mill walk rather than use a, car, (vi) Parking studies or surveys supporting this contention have not been submitted to the City. Further, no parking studies have been submitted to the City that would indicate less than twelve parking spaces are necessary for the proposed use. (vii) A staff site inspection during peak diriier hairs indicated that the majority of parking spaces available are located at the southeastern portion of the center that is primarily undeveloped. The proposed yogurt shop is locatedat the northwesteiVi portion. (viii) The applicant st;bmitted a survey of tenant occupancy within Building "Am, which has been verified by staff inspection, thtit indicates four units are vacant for a total of 5,700 square feet of gross leasable area. (C, B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, IT; IS FOUND, determined and resolved by the Planning c C6i1missior,.-uf *e City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows; ; (i) TIIsS Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth ;yin, the Recitals, part A of this Resolution are true atd = correct. That there is not sufficient :Avid<Ae to substrntiate the, applicants claim that the yogurt shop doe_ not need the full 'numbeJ� of parking spaces required. (III) That the approval of a Variance would cdlistitute a granting of Oecial privilege inconsistent w(th the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. ` (iv) That the approval ot` a Variance would increase parkin congestion and therefore be detrimental to the i;enith, safety and welfare of the General Public. (v) ,`cased wpon,the ftidinrs and cot clusions set forth above,this ' Commission hereby genies, wiRhout'pre3 dice, Variance 86-07. (vi) The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify through the adoption of this Resolution. t APPROVED AND ADOPTED TWS`14T.1€ DAY OF JANUAY, 19i87. PLhLIING COMIS.SIC4 CF THE CITY tr P.ANCHO CUCAWNGA i BY: . David Barker, ATTEST; Brad Buller,�Npuzy Swretary I. Brad Buller, Deputy Secretdry of the Planning Comaission of the City of Rancho Cucawmga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of January, 1987, by the fallowing vote-to-wit AYE S: g+h COP _ 3104lERS= NOES: COMISS10NERS: COMMISSILMERS• RESOLUTM NO, ;« A RESOLIT!'ION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING'COMMISSION APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 86-07 TO BARBARA ANN MOBERG LOCATED 7201 ARCHIBALD #11 IN. THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WHEkEA5, on the .1st day of October, 1986, an application was filed and acceoted on the abav64escribed project; and WHEREAS, on the 140 day ar day,!ary, 1987, the Planning Cominission held a duly advertised public 'hearing pursuant to Section 65854 "of the Calittorc�ia e.� r. t Code. SECTION 1:- The Rancho Cucamon4a-.Manning Coodision has road' the following'1=findings`: _ i 1. That a frozen yogurt shop is drtraordinary from a -, typical restaurant in -that it has a IiMted single item menu. .: _ 2. That a frozen yogurt shop is extrordinary from a typical retail food outlet in that much of its business ,is -der+Cved from sp;llover from adjacent businesses. VW 3. 1nat,a condition of limited seating wound regulate ` the w;mber of patrons. in the shop at any ape time. 4. That strict by, literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty inconsistent, with the objectives of thq,Deviglopment Code. 5, That a combination of the aforementioned findings support the granting of a Variance that will not constitute a_special privilege-ov_r other properties in the sgje district. 6. That tWt grafting of the Variance will not be detrime!ital to the public, heal ch, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. CONDITIONS: 1. The menu shall be restricted to, frozen yogurt, beverages, assorted yogurt toapkl, ,i. cookies, a1 brownies, frozen yogurt ,�Bies, waffle <cones,, and frozen yogurt oil waffles. 2. The ,•�-tokmt „per of seating at tables andfo,- counbirs shall be ,TtRitad to eight W. f r IF h APPROV 9 AND'ADOPtED T4IS 14th op_'•:OF JANlINFY, 1981. �tg v s • LANiiIN6 COMISSIQSB-SJF THE CI.1'Y OF'€tAmcHo COC ON , David ifi Ei7uuaiman 4 ''# ATTEST: t{ Brad as .er, De W J! acre aP=\ I, Brad ,40 Ter, Ndputy Sect^-#tary of the.planning Ca�rnis59o,a of tjte City of F Rancho Cucamonga, do her by certify that tyre fo gging Resal tion•xas,duly and regularly i. croducQd, a ed, and,�.d�pted by'tahe Rlannuing. CorerlissiG'n of. the ' = City of Rarejho Cucamonga, ,at a .regular iieting of the Flahnj,og Comp sston Reid . on the 14;h day of January, 1987, .y a fall oaaing vo te.to6 xwit:. Alf€S. COl'4RAISSION€RS: NOES: COMISSIONERS: r ABSENT: GD.10M1SSIONERS: Ama 1 4 , I t r r� 4 11i E^ CITY OF RANCHO CUCk.MONGA STAFFIREPORT u. r DATE: January 14, 1987 tan h r i � y TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Cynthia,S..Kinser, Assistant Planner ) SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSXIENT AND GENEM PL.A}! ANEN[WENT 86-03A - reques o amen ie snare an an se f a ap ro food Control to Low-Wdiv)m, Density Residential i4-8 dxeiling units*re for 40 acres of land located at the South t corner' of the extensions of Banyan and Milliken - APN: 201-271aaF, k4 I. BACKGROUND; At 'the Planning stion rsmeting of November 12, lvab,. LaIng Homes withdrew their involyeli6n in t7ais General Plan 1 Amendment and Kaufman G Broad now represent tine owner. Kaufman & r Broad proposed to incorporate the lq�mr 27 acres (Exhibit designated as Meairas Density--.- Residential (8-14 dwelling units/acre), with the sukiect stye of 40 acres to create a conceptual master plan of toe 67 acres. The Commission contJnut:d l r this 'General Plan Amendment to. january 14,, 1987 in,ordAr that a conceptual design be prepared: 'pp 31, CORRESPONDw yCE: Kaufman & Broad have rgys,esteci that this item be G.. ; continue 4.,,camplete the co;ceptual master plan- A letter' ` (Exhibit "A")'�'.rom Alvin 'Kaufer',confirms their reque'-A that this General Plan Amendment he continued to January 28; 1987. 1 III. Rv,OME"DAT 0 Sta:f requests that the viannirg Ccxmmissian gran con ua c o this General Plan Amendment to January 28, 1987. P.esp. tful s ttt Bract Buller City Plann r pB•Ci�:vc Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Alvin KAufer _ r Exhibit 00" - Subject Site and Plaster Plan,Ar.,Ni Staff Report of September 24 1986 Staff Report of November 12, 1986 3` 1 LAW OFFIcIEM ;1 N05SAMAN,GUTHMER,KNOX 8 ELLIOTT i SAN FN4Nclsco THIRTY-FI05T FLOOR WASp,NOTON. TMIRO FLOOR 4 S SOUTH FIGUEROA STRCCT 51RTH FLOOR; j 100 TNC C"RARCACCRO l 400 Itt^S}R6C7•Ny 3 SAN 7RANCISCO.CA 9410&-122 5 LIOS ANGELES.CALIFORNIA.00071-103S 1��SNIIVOTON A.Cr-ROO$e-0�®i (4151 s•a-ayoo rneRleonq lai»c,a-iedo �soa)art-rloo rcLceoRlcR tsnt oa-ratll � OWNdC'COUNTr l� AACRAN tN4 SUtTC.12s0 - }CLCX i7-4iC,i a i!O TOWN CCNTCR DRIVE : \`OI0 1 v sroccT SUITE]O0 F cosrA 7141 a oaeaa-,ao1 December 20 ].9$ r" '+" ` sAca�Hir:�,.CA ws�sl (rla!$ts•aara 12101 T ""' tYR:";iWS r+..+,SGi o14 NustOzw i0 C �.Qf # I t .sy{ fg p'il ••i- j-1l:1�J6 Mr. Brad Buller Planning Department: 9320 Baseline Roadi Post Sfficie Box: 807 Rancho Cucamonga, C,alifornsl 91730.. ! 'Re �enerf�l Plan Amettdmert� Hi�staTtcl and tdillifi+�ts Dear Mrs Buller; This will conf irm-I r mYr a,' 4 eemeztt that our request for a General Plan Amendment day be continued to '` aanuary '28, i98l, h wesy rely yours, i, .r Alvin S„ Raufe LA-2r.00l lQ/Asx.:mcm cc: fir. Otto Kroutil Adkh �:sNti:4iT� �► I�. a iiAi�i3lNO"C`l FC LM �" - NT aF W-A&Y N®R.T,R mip PLA!V.'wLi!N,G DIVISION F IT: .�c�A1L�: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM©NGA ` ST: "lF' �4�T U z DATE: Novefitb2r 12, 1986 197,7 TO: ChairaoaR and Members of time Planning,Conmission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner 64: Cynthia S. Kinser, Assistant Planner a- SUBJECT: ENVIRO SEtif AL. SSES i�'T AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDPSENT 85-03 71��CYR S= re ques , a eaten the en -a an an >P,e ap om°, Flood Control to Low-Medium Density Residential '(;4- du/act for 40 acres of land locilted at ' the southwest Sorner of the extensions of Banyan and Milliken - APN A 1471-55. I. BACKGROUND: At the Planning Commission meeting of September P4, a 4 quest by Laing Homes was presented to redesignate 40 f+ acres of land on the south ��corner oil R the extensions :of Banyan and Milliken from Flood Corifrol to.Low-Medfu+e Density Residential (4-8 dulac). At this;meeting, concern;4n raised as to the most i appropriate designation of the land in vela+.ion to surrounding I development and land use. Staff was directed to re-examine the area and come back with more detailed information, II. ANALYSIS The subject site (see Exhibit "B",) is `currently es gna ed Flood Control; due to the channel i zi ng of Our Creek, the site is no longer subject to flooding and may now�be considered ,. for development. For more detail of the site, see the attached. Staff Report. For the following descriptions, refer to Exhibit g. To the south of the subject site, the land is vacant and cur'-ant y � designated as Vedic Density Residential (8-14 du/ac) .art the Development District Map. The General Plan Land Use Map show:, the site as a proposed high school. The proposed Foothill Freeway takes approximately.' 1/3 of the proposed 'highs school site, which does not leave enough land for the high school.. At this time., however, the school district has indicated that a site adjacent to a freeway is not desirable ;and that more appropriate sites are currently under consideration. Southeast of the site the land is vacant and designated,as Medium Density Residential. The adjacent property being Hedium,-#sigh `14- 24 du;oc) with an approved tract of 308 condominitatrunits. ITEM 0 r, PLAtVA,NG G�1IS Tt1A� lrF REPORT71 General, Plan ;Araeriim�n�°86-03A ' ` x Land west of the site is designated Low-Medium,:Residential and the q site is 'vacant. .Adjacent to this site the property is designated t Low-Medium and has an approved tract for 304 single family units. The northeast 'property is, vacant and currently ,designated Low- lieditmi Density Residential. This site it current'iy under consideration for a land use Change (GPA.86-030) fron Low-Medium to Low Density Residential t2-4 du/acY'. General Plan Amendment 86-030 has been continued to January14, 1981, North and northeast of the sOject site is vacant and designated as Flood Control. The land belongs to the San Bernardino County Flood Control District and may bJ'capable of being deaeloped in the ' future. The Caryn Planned Community is to the east of the sfte. The land is designated as Low Density,:Residential with 6,000-11,000 square foot lots for:,',n average of 7,200 square 'foot lots north of the `_pine road aid_4,00�1-10,000 square foot Tots south of. the spine road with an averaxae of 5,10Wtquare foot lots. III;. LAND USE ALTERNATIVES: The Commission consider the following as possible designations for the subject site: 1= Flood Control: This is the current designation of the land. e an may+ remain with this designation, but as the land is i no longer required for flood control use, a change will eventually occur. 2. Low Densit Residential Q-4 du/act: A change to this designation will be eons s eii and'uses to the east in the Uzyai Planned Community.. However., there may be some coppatibility problems; with the land to the south, currently de ignated Mediiz Residential (8-14 dufac), unless that parcel i f also redonsidereed. 3. Low-Redium Densi+yinasidentisl (4-8 du/ac): This designation j s requestedy e app7pT can£ an s consistent with current desigration .°to the wi:st and northwest, and compatible with other existing designations in the ieAmediate area. 4. Medium Density Residential (8-14 du/ac): This would be consistent witn ffie de3ignations to the—south and south west, but less compatible with land to the east. ' a P IN REBEP1i fi C tO Geieral Pat co O# 1 November * Page 3 FI f Ili, RECOl�iEglbTID'N.. Staff is requesting, diY*tiat, as to �NO most apprsipr—i"a`ie;A esignatibn ;of the subject site. From the,(land use alte a Fjo4d Control is preferred,. a Reso'Futt.,on of Denial fs approp�fatly' If a'Low or Kedium sansity ResVjenttal 'is preferred, t► n.;apprrjva1 of the.Resolut€:on of oenia1_and,!a t`equest for this cna g to brought foi ward in,tha next Ge4rap' Alan x Gycl a retool d 1 apppt`itist�!. Ilf theoamt gs on'prefers a Low-tiedium Density es�iden fa .019 tati-on, per the applicant's requesit, then ' a .NegatiMe Dgci'ara io ' a1cd approval of the attached Re;ol'ution of Fpproval arould 6e appru,1-i`ate. Re's Su Brad Bull r �. City Planner BB:CIt:ar I Attachments. Exhibit "Al' - Existing land Use Designations Exhibit "B" - Deveioiagent District & General 91an, . Staff Report of Septa*Er 24, 1986 Resolution of Approval Resolution of Denial _I Il t t1 \3 a3 E f \ -jr � . . .. :. , .w . : ~ � - • � § \�¢���z �r .sxa� . . . w. . v ! y� : • �: . . . w_ . \ #6: \ »2 , < < < « . , > » ±x �: ■ : « .V/•. -- DGGiL LM Lma LM� Grere�_ I 1 ®. CAIMT PLANNEb L -Me ® m COl4 MUNITY � i L44 AI Fc VICTORI PL G*v*ta unt Districts -; ! Chaffay Hi _ ------ -- ! Collage _ �1 • ® _ 0 esi = =_ I Genwal Plan NORTH 77 kG4 r�QCAMC�N.y i CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONGA STAFF REPORT k kip f u. 6 F a z > 'G3 U DATE: September 24, 1986 ►977 j TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Cynthia S. Kinser, Assistant Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAIR AMENDMENT 86-03A LAB reques a:amen a General Plan use map`-frog Flood Ceni,`ol to L(w-Medium Density Residential (4-8 du/ac) for 40 acres of land located at the southwest corner of i;he extensions of•Banyan and Milliken - APM - 201-271-55. 1/ 1. ABSTRACT: Laing Moans has initiated this General Plan Amendnent from, FT'iod Control to Low Medium Density Residential for 40 acres of land located on the southwest corner of the extensions of Banyan sad Milliken (see Exhibit "A°). Staff has ccepleted an Enviromahtai Assessment and analysis of the proposal and recommends approval of the Aarsndment. i' 11. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action RWasted: Mend the General P --n ),,and Use Map from Me ontro"f to Low-Medium Residential. B. Location: Southwest corner of the extensions of Bp*an and Milliken C. Parc#�t Size: 40 acres of Land. 0. Existing Developeept District: Flood Control. E. Existing Land Use: Vacant. F. SurroundingGeneral Plan Designations: xa�—=F°1W Control:-- South - Proposed high school, Flood Control. East - Low Density Residential-. West Low-Nediue Density Residential. G. Surrounding Lund Use and Davelopment District Designations: A•orth - Vac"W71-o-ad Conzvo I, South - Vacant; Medium OKosity Residential, East - Single fasily residential; Caryn Planned Comwnity, West - Vacant; Flood Control. PLANNING COMISSIOH STAPF REPORT GPA 86-03A - LAING HAS September 24, 1986 Page 2 H. Site Characteristics: Vegetation consists of scattered trees, grasses, and weeds, otherwise vacant. III. GENERAL Pt.A'sd AM2NT ANALYSISs 1. Rood Control: The General Plan Land Use lisp designates the pro ec sites Flood Control. The purpose of this designation is to preserve land that is partir-utariy subject to flood#ng 4 ,and for protection in other areas due to flooding. The General ,Plan states' " ..portions of the City fall within the 100 year Flood Plain which is an area of land subject to potential inundation by a storm whose intensity occurs cn the average of once every' 100 years.:" "Upon improvements to both 04canoaga Creek and Deer Creek, flood hazard areas irr1 be significantly diminished west of Milliken Avenue. Floodwaters in the pity have seriossly dm9ed homes, vehicles, and roads, is well as threatened lives. Moreover, the debris and soil carried by t�ha,�:�od 14ters are deposited �on local ANIL streets, private "yards, ZOd driveways, resulting in significant maintenance and repair costs." Site Deer C aek Channol has been Completed and according to the Federal Emergency Management, Agency, the project site is no longer subject to flooding. The land is privately owned and and may be considered for development (see Exhibit "0"). 2. School Facilities; Siace the area immediately adjacent to the NOR s ---s&signated as a potential high school on the General Plan, staff 'iias eonte—zied the Chaffey High;,School 0istrict for comments. TK* District indicates primary interest in another general location, but does express potential interest in the subject site as a secondary 'choice (see Exhibit OC") An issue is whether the subject site should retain its current-Flood Control designation or whether. it should -te redesignat^d for some form of development. The site is privately owned, r.') ;onger subject to flooding and not needed for flood control purposes. The applicant---, is requesting a Low-Medium Density Designation. The School Riste-tcr-°: is not requesting that the site be reserved as a school at this time. Should the City approve the proposed LM Designation, the High School District will have another opportunity to comment, if and when a subdivision map or a development project f,' filed for the site. At that time, tFP bistrict would have the opt',on of pursuing acquisitio, of the site if the primary location is no longer viable. 10. Mr, . .rF REPORT , September 2M1, 1986 Page 3. Land Use £ bility: The site is aujavarrt'to Lora and Low-1404i00 Bensity es n i'aTitiw Medlftw Uensity Residential along Highland "s Avenue and the future Route 30 Freeway. tho-dosignation of Low. Medium Density Residential appears comintibfe with 1,he adjacent \i Lies, The General Plan di cusses this use as follows "Low 'Medium t4-8 dwelling :unfits per grass acre. the owl category is. characterized * re:sidential densit es somewhat gc-itar�~ than the low deitity residential group. -t�th §Hass densities ►ver5g.4 between 5-8, d4a11ing units per Acre; nsidera�bty �s1t 'ea housing types WAY be rtjted, Snc�rdine�-typical s stoAle-k fawily, single-fully %era lot Chia!, duplex, artd under certain conditions up to 4-6 townho%;,,e»type units,. This category would bo appropriate within Jow density areas to encourage greater housing. diversity ;othout changing the single-family character pi'. the surrounding residential character." IV. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT., The Initial Study has been completed y s a an : no significant adverse envixcwuntal impacts were considered to be associated with the site. V. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Should the Cowmistion, upon examination of the General Plan Amenament, decide that this change would promote the Land Use Goals and Policies of the General Plan and would not be detrimental to the adjacent properties or cause significant adverse. impacts al;� listed ur4er the Ent*rorwntal Assessment, thv foll'awing findings are necessary ,t, far'zppr°a�Aai. A. rn`a Amendment does not conflict with th- Land Use Policies of the General Plan, U. The Amendment does promote the goals of the Land Use Element, and ' C. The Amendment would not be materially in$uriou;. or detrimental to the acUacent properties. VII. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertises as a public hearing in The Billy e or-f newspaper and notices were sent to all property owpXrs wirnin 300 rnet of the .%ub3 ect site., To date, only the aforementione4 response from the Ghaffey School District has been recwaived. _. y_<sa FGMNIt" Septser'� , l9Hf � � e Page 4 `:III. REC lENDATIONt Staff recomend�,approval of the General PIA'n' A n ent" s po ,lf:the Plnnis}g °C ►ission finds tls3 �erc�eht Via„ anted, adoption,,bf 4fse "d"ttnched Re"s'til+ution recomending approval t� �ie City Council of fhe 6enoral Plan P�nr�ent arid. isjuanc!� af� NeOtfve B+ectaration woulc ;e.a,ppropriate. t If the Planning Comity` ion finds. that, the requested, Mendment is in �1 conflict with tho Land,Use Pai�icies,bf the Ge►:eral Plan,_>air�i d9'hs,' not; prowte the &Dais and,ob�.6cttves of the Land Use Element, �adopt'On of-the attached gisbirtton of f3enial would be appropriate. Re r ul e City Planner 8g:CK:ko v. Attachments-:\",,Exhibit "A" - Subject Properiv Exhi-biIt "80 - General Plan A Aexelopment Districts Exhibilt "V _ Letter from Chaffey.School District *' fj Rmss:lukion of Approval i, Resatution r penial t� p Pe da jig ? t N �ta. 9 4 aY h b g x o al � n r Subject Property(79 acrid) ph'Atty affected by G0 AN JOHN LAING HOMES DATE PFfSFARED,?-3^96 4 k��• .f3 c .. F y,fx a : a Irr .iMill tY �� A11.7 -lilml7 l r ' ' j j' •7 �r # e ........® UMMU f I -omensm Plan 1 LM LM9 . t _Ca��r�l•. LNI ',PLAt' NEV , M Com. Y; Lm LM Fc �.. ( VICTORI PL DOVOIOPMe 1t DISt ftte NUttTH a CITY OF iTEN 1: Q 3 A RAI CHO CL;CAMONGA TITLE:�,�t�CaF�• PLANNING DIVISI4\T EXHIBIT- SC AL r G - t4 . � 211 tN ST FIFTH STRE!"1, (VTRRICi,,CAtiFOR{dtA 99752-139f3 (ryh)98B•85tt +. 4 S e� ' AaS+Ksadntend�+rt o1;:zhoo AsrxEar)3up¢dntArkant `�A,msnm$otgn-lya tdtnt . ,ttt3u39.ttWutn AdmihaxrafimWers n:7 inspuaatn. D"n L S—thxo @atF B.`Mp•riiod; . ' �1SFiti��t v?o�wo og rwsnt`9 icacna.n u x awy attr c. Asymand t,4wi4 P cud's a.;un;ney�Gdnld w wa SeptAmbeh S, 1996 sl tan fgauen, Au0c late viannek ClTV OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA , P.O. Box 807 Rd=110 Cucamonga, CA 9XI30 ff: Cenerta.L P&n AMendMemt 16-03 I,t Ae8po_sae to 964 U,5a Un ngere!d tieVea og Auguat 13, 143,6 A®r a�uUng the jmpenty 06 M�taken na�tth o6 iUghtand --"the Gel an4we�s W1 eait glue yxA is that the, CM66ey U.UatJ at .e.a cold,.IdVing,FanothV"'prtogPe4.aa jt4. hd%aat aho.ice:but that the ;> Wen pltopeaty mad :atM btu' conaidened ehou-°d�om 6,crest cheice nit pQn out, Be advlaed that WAe M to become mate ante "ted 'n the Woken rytcrmte it cost" be the nortthe�cn 6o4ty acAe�s, p.tuo at none with no„,4nte ,6t ;in �hei juthenn g, gontdon. I wEah we co atd be mote 6peai6.ic':in ovA >teaponse. S,inceAety, ' STEPII.Em L. BUTTERS' Ddxectorc Bua<neaa Sekvccea C[T.•oG RRNCyo CUCAMJNOA PtANN1kc'olvm-or,. !la"• SEP OR I98f; Sts/ab r 131�Ic5rb" cc• AWn S. Kaugen jf �i16rr t!G n tC11O0Lt: ALTA LOtAA•GNAFFEY ADULT EDUCATION•CNAE'FfiY.DOMINOA•eTIWANDA+MONTCLAIR•ONTARIO•upLANU.VAIttY kaEW G_15- I 2 1 tJ � NI:iNlJ4N . __ AVlNUT, 1 lu i NORTH CITY OF, ITEND A RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE- FLwW-A Ems AAeb. + PLA.NNtNG CIVISION3LE- — C'Vfy OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA zyCa��, STAFF REPORT ( p DATE: January 14, 1987 t 1977 , TO: Chairman of the Planning Co=is"sion '. FROM: Brad Buller, City ,Planner ' Ji BY: Cynthia S. Kinser, Assistant Plannor WBJECT: ENVIRONMERTALkSSESSMEMT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86-03D , reques '�a n, e an se amen a en"eral �P-1w! frrori Low"Med:ium Density Residentfal (44 dwelling u6its/aci3O. to Low Density Residential (24 dwelling, e)units/acr and/or Very Low , ":iia1 dies titan Density_` Residers 2 dwelling units/acre) for :._ . 1 68 acrk s of land` ecated at-the southwezt corner of Wilson iif extended) avid Milliken (if extended) - APR: 201-191- .1, 17. ENVIROINENTAL ASSESSMENT , AND DEVELOPPENT DISTRICT MENMENT - - ,aAArequest to anr.n a Development DI'stritt - lap from "Fe"" (Mood Co�:trol) and "LM" (Low.-Kedfamp Density Residential - 4-8 dwelling units/acre) to`%" (tow Density Residential - 2-4 " dwelling units/acre) and/or, "VL" {Very.`,L Low, Density J' Residential - less than' 2 duelling units/acre) for 68 acres of land located at the southwest ,corner of Wilson (if extended) and Milliken ,(if extended) 201-191- 11 �3.. 1. BACKGROUND: At the Planning Commission meeting of September 24, i' 3936�-& request to change the General Plan Land Use Map from Low-'- MeditO Density P,esidentie,1 (4-8 dwelling units/acre) to Low Density Residential (2-4 dwealging unitslacre) in conjunction with .a Develepment Districts Amendment was reviewed. This regueat was initiated by City Council. (Please see the attached.,Saptember 24, 1986 stafr report for more details.) ,At the rsnmission meting, concern was raised as to whether Low Density Residential 'was an appropriate transitional designation from surrounding 7 s� lGb,and, use I (Exhibit "A"). The propertV ow^a, `iiso asked.that he be given the opportunity to prepare conceptual plans for the subject site,, and present the plan to the planning'Commission prior to decisions on the property being madde. ITEM H 1 PLANT NG"'omml.TxSST(t;d ;> APF REPORT ' s a " 6PA 86-03D & ODA,ii6!Q5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCftNGA ' January 14, �t98T ' Pagn 2 , ry. The Commission con inu2d this . General OlanL Amendment- and Development District A6�indment in order for the 'landowner to provide a conceptual HP'*ar: :consistent with the Low Density. designation. Stafr"; was requested to provide options at both the ',.ow and Very Low,dasignations. .R• 11. OPTIONS AVAILAOLE: There are two options available to the (A) That the Low-Medium designation to be changed to Law Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units/acre). This is consistent with the property owners preference. (B) That the subject `site to be charged to Very Lour Density Residential (less than 2 -dwelling units/acre) per the l Commission's previous discussions. Alternative A: The property owner,wound prefer thatthe ,subjeirt site De clanged Low Density Residential (;t-4 dwelling unitslacra). This designation would permit /single family residences on tots of 8,000 square feet .average qJininw.. This designation(,would.,pe,ovide an ade4uate transition of densities to south of Banyan's,average of 6,000 square. foot 1ots. Nowever, the r north portion of the site;abutts Deer Greek with its 1 acre: lots and the transition Mould be more abrupt. On December 3, 1986; a representative of the property, comer submitted a tentative tract map application Irk divide tfte property into 203 dingle fatally lots at a densitY of-1.05 dwelling units per acre (Exhibit 98"). Parcels proposed for the site range in size from 8,562 square feet to 18,940 squLare. feet with an'average lot size of 10,944 square feet in area. The;lots are generally located on cul-de-sac streets coming .-off of tine major' north-south circulation epire connecting Wilson Avenue and Banyan Str,_et which creates a number of sub-neighNorthoods within the project,4 While no unit product type has`:been submitted as part of,,this application, discussions with Oe the applicant ihdicate that residences constructed on stem wills with raised wood floors are being considered.. As a result, the only grading that will be necessary will be for construction of the streets and associated`_ improvements. It is important to note that no action is being requested on the'. tentativ,,a tract map application at this time. The tract map is provided urely as an informational aid to conceptually+ depict how tine site Mid-be developed at the Lowy DensiV, Residential .. PLAt.d 'GdR64'�a�i� ._ "#'AFC' REF`0R1 ° DPiA BS...03b CITY`�F RAt,"HO CI,PCPd+�NNWi `r Janwary I4, 1987 y Page 3 n standards. if., the P1anrlinu Cc\Mission ,determine that Lar Density Residential Is the 4roptiaete 6'enera,r'Plan i D�Ye1 pcnent District tk:signation„ thb to-AO&Ive, �`ract nav will continue through the committee process so tics itcal and 'resign. fssues 'cars ,be resolved prior to faraial action try 0a P14 ning CbiiTfssion `"31 a Alternative B. The tr,,oa fission f�as',,re�uested the ;altekati�e of Ve`iy'Toii errs, ty Resioehti,>a1 on the,suWact site This.designation +° requires 22;,500 square loot lots and iv normally assodated with ar. extensi.vg trail,=isystem'1ind an envirar44A conducive ;` equestrial {' use. If designa>>ted:Very! Low, approximately130 dwell,ipgs Mould be permit terll on the sate by-the Aeneral {;!11an, •. he gh If &&,pod .. un(ler that Ci .y's Basic sttandards ;as a donvet� onal subdivision, a merle trealjitic potential", would, be aroW41100 units. The exact ntmher warOd`of course de{)end on the sp&4S' s of design. ' The Very,l.ow designa,-ion would provide iin appropriate transition In density �a! the north, adjacent to the ier Creek p;,oj<ect.. However the transition to the area south �; Bomar%?designated Lr+d-t+1a�#uor would 'represent a two-stej change (Very, LOO to Low--Medlum), and would as a result he lets ippropr6,ate. III. EAVIR6WERs'AL:'J SSEScA%NT: the Jniti'�rl Stud ;has been completed for i lio'th a NN q n-d Very716►a ttesignations by staff an no sign'lflcaot advek'o envii6ftental impacts+were i4*ntif to to be associatO with eid;hq!R alternat+ue. IV.' ,FACTS FOR PIEIDIlY: Should ilie Comirtsian, .6pon examination t1f the s; UY eneriff 'PTdo Amendmont and rivelopraent District Amenchent, decide that the changee, would prr.,Rote the land use goals- and polic,;i'r3 of the General 'Plan, woKtld not be mnterially detrimental r. to tt#c"adjacent properties or YAia d not cause significant adverse' ' envioormental, impacts, the folIr4ing are the findings that ,are necessar3f upon-gptoval A. The Amendimnts ado not cornftict with the Land Use Policieis of else Geaneral Plan', tvid B. The Amardments do promot goals of the Land Use Element; an(! C. The faendments would not�be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent propert;es and D. That the isubject propel 4 is suitable for the uses permitted in, the proposed district in terns of access, size, and compatibility with existing land stse;in t-urrounding areas. 1 H"3 ,4 P IiD Sg Q F REPORT �! asru M3B 1�98�`•&8 W� .CITI' OF RVU0 CUCA14ONGAagA s u; ! s P VI.I,WRRESPOUDEWOw lftft, item has-bden adwartis �1�-as a 'public hearing 3n I to ..y! ite or{ts newspaper:. The I,"prop rty� ws pasted, .and r, not Ices, :e sen a,a proper y o ni;'i^s Within 40' feet,.of the pn��ect sites ,� „ VII RE'CMENDATIOM. Ste f, requesting direct n as to the most appFop e, gnation for th p operti; Rene, Lions'are attached f r.t4a�t 'xapdV� ;De�si+ 'Res�identiai'�estignations I'fe ' a t lcts tti , mf ;thasa� aptfiens,, approve=t;''of 'the ap�rq t��ic solution a ApprioUll isfreeessaryt Re spec 1 submitted, ; T i YYYS} A J� Br adi lQI° i City P annerr ,5 ` DB• Attachments: Exh6ir't 'A" - lanai Use r. Exhi41't.!`B" - Catscpte}ai.Tt�ct elan r i�nuWs-of Sep'temb�er 24, 1990 Planning Coup4ssi116n Add, I Staff iteport - Septed er 24, 1985 Resolut ;ons of Approval I y` H 4 a V L tt i cr_ Fc LAA yFA LOTS L,M fia-.11,L A L P � vr NC ! , m L I*L+Pi$ � NORTH CITY OF PLANNTING DMS101.1 EXHIBIT:—A,—SCALE: I i •; a'�� .n "vas,r.' ' -.. - � ' i � x � i a :. � a ■• a Z ti aria errs ./y/1 { y r e a r �y I vwAw gill 9s ra® �4 a i go i !pt !o aim WN Cl—1p it.. 41YtIttQRI £ r1l: SESS[+ fi"_� :AND Q@!l�L ORIMEliT t1I,STiPC�T: lll�Nl�F4k#lY 8G-44' - C�I3Y " vv ups ame eve s�h°�a �rnom `�} O d , 'I4= o "OF, fs r locte sidi'* thfil aouieVArd, 125 feet west of an Avsnue (49i1 � ootti ll Boutevard) ,- ARN 2084241-c9 Alan Warren, Assnclate Planner, presdta0d the stafereport.' ` o Chairman Stout 'paned,the public hearing . Ryan Sellers, 1 306 FislCinle;+%Avenues Ohino,,urged approval of ihi request. r Steve Lucas., 90,19�Apri,00t, Rancho Cucanson f siapportpd the request un behalf of the adiacent prod t . o neFt There were no further-•,cala ts, thsWore the public hearfog.wax cTfased. rt Motion: Moved. by Stout; siecohdad by Tolstey, to recommend appr""ova7 of Envi ronmetttal ASsessie t anzl'General Plan_ Awdaent a6�63` C to the City Council. notion carried'by the folIowi09 voter COMAISSI011ERS STOUT., TOLSTOY, BARKER, CHITIEA, ICNIEL C. . NOES: COMMISSI'O!lERS: NONE F ABSENT: COMMISSIONER& NONE ,' �carHed Motion: 14ov-, by Stout, s,condsd by Barker, to re omund approval of Enviromental �-ssessment and Development Oistvict Amendnent 86-04, to the City :Council. Motion carried by the foil oi.,;Iiij vote: AYES: COMISSION£RS % STOUT, BJLRXER, CHITIEk MCNIEL, TOLSTOY ar, NOES: COWISSIONERS ROME ABSENT COMISSIONERS: HOU£ 4arried' E request to n a and 01W. eme o General re roe edfut a Density Residential (4-8 00/ac) to Lore Density RpSidanti��l f4-4 dulac) for 6R a his of land Tof-ated at the southwest corner of Wilson of extended) and Hi�liiken (if extended) AF1i 201491 11, 17. J Planning Cowie on Minutes -19- September �4, 1986. r rogues a amen evoo�gen s r,c ape .aa o o } aid t.M" (Corr MedtUK Density.Reside ial 8t�du' $ to ` " iLowtensa y,�Resi dent�ial' w 2-4 du/e}c}' for S8 acres of 1 and ? ate at the southwest corner of Wilson (if extended}.�d „ ¢ .,2tik 191 Otto Kroutil, 5enigr Planner, presented the'staf2 report. Chairstan'Stout stated that hl C k thought.the�County,s Foothilommuni"ty,plan showed Wilson extended across to�Eti►vanda.` — i Paul Rougeau, c.ioy Traffic E ,gineer. explained that the Foothill cmumnity. Plan shows a-`street ifn tote genaral ,vitcl' ity .af ,iffl�sa,�whioh extendsn across to 24th Street in Etiwara. Heradvfsad ataa'nyan is ta'extend totiwasssa and tmt�i ithat staff would be i ngak ndMent"toy°tti s Ci r�ut�i' tan+pj;an in the versa near future. He f!rther statrtd that the isnuk needs 11 .Le more- ci osalytudi ed°as to whether the, ouiwe frcaa ,iti1<sar� t ". MiT ti kends ou}d-.be retained. w Chairman Stout #A concerned that it looks like the City,has turned its back an the area north of Highland. He suggested that if the Ci,tt�� was Joi'ng to correct,: Banyan on the Circulation plan, Uilson should be studied at the saw time. ,4e then opened t`e public hearing. Tracy Lean Tibbels,, 10,51122 Wilson, Rancho Cucawn,98, addr,"essed the,Cquission an be!talf of hiaatelf as a re`�i; nt and.also an.iiiehal.f of the lan;J.inners. He felt that 2-�4 units per acre wa.t.A st�rm091Y appropriate desigiiitod for thi site. He suggested that the C-o"i`jsf.on sontinrn: its decision on thi. aeendment far 90 days to-- allow thr landowner to meet with staff, surrounding homeowners and CHaffey College. He indicated that the la,°downer_ would then bring a precL proposal to City„ Jim De'lorie, representing Chaffey College, supported' the Low Density designation. He pointed out that on the east border of the college there not only are atheletiC fields', 0n also undeveloped land that has hen designated by the college specifically for field study. FuAftor, that the coTTege had no intention of ever developing that land. He encouraged�'disce:ssions between tf;e landowner dnd the College in order to Oe�eTop a more coherent idea of how the land,will be used. There were no further comments'," therefore the public hearing was closed. Chairman Stow- stated that he would like to see what the project proposal might nook like on this site. He felt this might be an appropriate direction to take prior to making a decision on the amendment. Planning Commission Minutes. -20- September 24, 19PAM COW ssion6 rrtarker' stated that he-had no heuitancy in voting at .his--ttR He stated that the,appropriate designation s:lould be Very Loa. \ Cortatissioner 7oistoy stated that he was on the Coaiaission. at the time the rnag ., was filed on this piece of property and one of the things the CoWission was s J quite`,copcerns ,,""t- was that edge treatment ,between the Copt ege and this { site. Ho expiaf�d that-It was de"tided at that time that the higher'dsnsity would allow alu _ rina?bt`-�he unt�J and preside open space. fie thought that fl the final projecf imw7tfpted�the. concerns q�fi the deer Creek residents in that '»t allowed transition betireen° their, pn perty and this project. and the 61 WOO ng of bui train s, open' space and"i:he` edge treatment also addressed ' itself to the°,Collega�s need . It sed:,that the reason th+;pr^jegt.wag never built was because- was.not eccna��iccalry feast°ble to dtt ; Fle poi°rated out that if thin prrsjaect wmis level opt at•;4 units.ltew acre, t�e�� would' be a terrible, grading. problem. He felt that tli;� Low designation ►Kyoto opt rrovide a prop*r transi titer a'ext the only project"al titrnati ve reoul d hE Very LW,. - Cp, rissioner Chitita stated that her` incli!a>:*Qns were the st+ser and agreed to>et Very Lo :s, amad to be ttul appropriatu.,iesignati'on. s Gait§Stoner M ltel stated that 11 did, not have an objection to the Lou desi,pati on. UU6 hvroutii, Senior Planner, advised'tbat the City it t� a�itant on this a rdeent request. Ht asked counsel if tbia Cis;� could reinitiate the it a�tendsent and readvertise it in this Cenerai plan Cyj' as a re Loan density, !e quest for Very Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney, advised that if tie City is Nilling to withdraw its regva,- it could reinitiate s.► zsendeent to Very Low. Joe Sevilla, representing the PennhivT "Corporation, advised that some G` conceptual plane had been Submitted on this rrojoct to City staff. He felt that the request for the continuances would give everyone the opportunity to see what a good developer can do with this piece of property. He felt that he i could solve all of the concerns of everyeat involved. He a ked for tiny! to G Wroach Ch&ffty Colltge and t4-e peer- Creek. Homeowners to show them the conceptual' plans and then present then to the Commission befarm they traka a decision on this piece of property. Mr. Buller pointed out that' this amendment is for, 'land use and the applicant could come hack wfth a Proposal, but there would be no guarantee that this is the ray tba project would be built. He suggested that if the Commission's direction lrould be to continua the amendment request for 90 daya, staff could advertise the amrendatnt as ei' .ir Low or Very Low. He asked if the Commission would like the proposal by Gilt applicant to be conceptual or should the appK:ant file a tentative crap cuncurrently with the amrendrtent. `} E E Planning Commmission Minutes -21- Se teimba, 24, 1986 k 7 . . -, Commtss*aner Totstoy stated I4at the problem he :would have with filing the tentativk, msp concurrently, i,�;'athat if the Corsaiss on feels the site should'b Very Low, the' applicant would, have made the expense of designingJt'e tract one Low designation. Sam Sterpa, '200 N. Glen Oakt, Glendale, California, property owner;, was concerned thai,,the Commissitj was once again considering reducing the dens ty on his property. He adarsed that he has been' in,..-!_a otiations with this project r&ny times. did not feel he could find a buyer who wPnuid be wishing to comply with avne or one-half acre loU lf,balow the property there is a 12 unit per acre project. H advised that' while he would not be extremely happy about it, he would a ,,lot the 2-4 unit per acre-,designation.,.He stated that a Very Low designation would seriously inhibit the," x marketability of the propert;+a Motion: Moved by S*tut:seconded,,by McNiel, to:continue the public hearing t, fors Environmental iaessmestt and ,9lenerai Plan ° Amendmext. 86-03D and Envi,•onmental Fssr nt''and OeveiaparenZ fistrict 86-05 .toj" :e January 14, 1981 Planning Ca v:dion ,seating. The landowner is to sup3► 'the Cori sion with a c9 csptual plan at the Loa designation. The cance oual plan is,- become a�part of the permanent reco:�,i for comparison of future aPplixati'ons.' Staff was directed to provide options at both the Low and Very Lose - designations, M. ENVIRNMENTAL ASSESS NT ARJD `GENERAL PLAN AMENDA RT 86-03E - CITY OF RANCHO G A,rsqnslu ZO amen a Use Element of tne Genera' an r�n ca/ProFessional to Nedium Denetty Residential (4-14 du/a for 3.56 acres of land located at the southeast corner of Church and Arch'vta"d APN 1017-332-26. EWIRONNUTAL ASSESSMEht ARD DEVELOPMEW,-DISTRICT AMENDMENT 86-06 - CITY . UA - A req�uuee V amen eve opmen sir c map � roar "�' '. dujac) for acres of land lccated at the southeast) corner of ^hurch and Archibald - APH 10777132-26. Otto Kroutil, Senior planner, presented the staff report. Chairman Stout asked for clarification as to why this amendment was proposed. Brad Buller, City 'planner, advised that the City Council directed that all Office Professional parcels in the City outsidD the Haven Corridor be re- evaluated. J) ChairsaaN Stout opened the public hearing. Lloyd Michael, 6320 Haven venue, Rancho Cucaiaonga, co-owner of the parcel, opposed the amendment. He did ,Ot agree that all Office Professional should be located on Haven Avenue andfelt the property was appropri,_ptely designated. Planning Commission Minutes -22 September 24, 19 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGACAAJ STAFF REPO DATE: Septenkier 24, 1986 1977 TO: Chairman`d d Mtbers r4,the Planning Gos>atWon FROM: Brad Butler, Citi`Planner 'r BY: Rubin Ysl,, Associate Planner SlfB4ECT; Ft1YYR0Nt°kNTr:L!,ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMt NftKT 86-030 L freques to amend ta an u ise Elemen a. Tn' meral Plrid from Low Medium Densf-ty Residential d ' 8 du/at�) to Lour Density Residentia;,` -4(2 du/ac) for 661. acres of land located at the,southwest: • 1 coYver of tiilsm (if extended) and Milliken (if extend.,u) - APH 201-191w11s 17. ENdIR0P M61 •A[. ASSESSMEkrr AND DEVELOPAEIrs DISTRICT reques !_ i ° :ase a ve opmn ,; rr3ct r . d Control) and "LM" (Lort`Medivaa �ensiy' Res'<dential - 4-8 , du/ac) to "L" (Low. Density Residential - 2=4 du/ac) for 66 acres of land located at the souttomst corner 'of Nilson (if extended) and Milliken (if extended) - APN 201-191.41, 17. I. ABSTRACT: Recently, the City Cuincil l`=directed, the staff to n a e7a General Plan 0*ndment for the area east of Chaffey College bounded by Hil;s , Banyan snd Deer Creek Ct�-.Anel. The re uest Is for a change from LM (4-8 du/ac) to L (r-4 du/ac)b in conjunction with this Amend gent,, staff has initiated a Development District Amendment frzm 104 and PC n L to' assure 4onsistency between the General.Plan and Dxvelopmek District Maps (see Exhibit TI-. BACKGRO VD: In 1982, tte PIL-nning Commi".''sion approved a vie e-opment proposal (TT 11SW for 501 condominiums and 8 single family dwellings for majority`of the site-- l"A 1984, the Planning Commission approved r.-, extension for 1-• . „radt map for two years. In June of this year, the project prkenent requested an extension again, but it was denied by the Planning Comaatssion. The project axpiresr in July of this year. The easterw4ost 140 feet of the area, bounded by the college, Wilson, Batlyan rid the Channel (see Exhibit 118% is curtentiy designated FC on the Development District Map, LM of the General Plan, and belongs to the Flood Control District. In order to avoid fragmentatica of future land use, this 140 foot wide strip is i ITEM L` FLANGING C(IM ISST©)d'-S 'F REPORT tt GPA,$6-030 ,C'I[lt F RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 24,'3986 Page 2 r included in thi,.t�"'Amendment. If aisproved, cis Wadment would °n result in t1m enit.,�a'area being designated L« under ba'h,f�:he i;er" raI Plan and the CgMi')pment Cade, The Hood Control Dir, fa is not .; opposed i c3,the change. III`, PROJECT,M3 Si'iE DESCRIPTION: A. Action R nested: Change: 1) The Generil Plan Land Use Map from L, nsi`tJr Residential (4-8 dulac) to Low Density Reside nfii l (;: du/ar?, and 2} tine DevcliiWt nt 'District Map frost ion+. Piedictar ,Residential(4-8 cal/act/Floik Control to Low Resit�en ial (2-4 du/ac). 8. Location: Sokih sdd of Wilson Avenue (if extended) and west f an Avenue (if extended). C. Parcel Size: 66 acres of land, D Existing Land Use: Vacarkt, undeveloped. f E. Surrounding Laud Use an4 Zoning- ur ar Misting s ng`)'e achy residential (Dear Creek), designated Very Last Residential (less tk n 2 dt;tac): vacant,,~v signated Very Low Residential (less than 2 dulac). South - Vacant, designated Low-Medfo Residential (4.8 du/ac) East - Vacant, designated Flood Control, Nest Chaffey College, designated Low-Medi'�Q'Residential (4-8 du/ac). G. General Plan Designations. l lec • ,e - LN-Malux Density Residential (A:-8 du/ac). North Very Low Density Residential (;Tess than 2 du/ac). South Low-tWIm Density'Residential (4-8 MAO. East - Floed"OntM'- West Maffey College ('Piblic Facilities). IV. ANALYSIS: The site is .situated between propertlea with General a�drations cf Very Lour (less than 2 Wac) to the North, and Low44ediw (4-8 du/ac) to the south. As a result, there is a 'lack, of 4ppropriate transition in land use. To a2ke matters worse, the existing Dear Creek subdivision ou the north side of Wilson,, is developed in one`-'acrFe residential lots, while the subject site permits develo(oment oi! UP to or du/ac. This: raises- obvious compatibility questions. particularly along Wilson kvenue. ��� P.AN�lIi ISSI,Oa S F� RERORT 6 "F,ip OF)r -06-CUCAMOR1 September f Page g The`awbdect site,is also situated between a 'sr. !-rural and park- like college cWOS to the,west ,and a large Flood Control area to thy;east:; Again the existing"-General Plan designation does.not provide foc an tappropri t transition of land use. -`"Tt1e,proposed 1 Change to Lou Qensjity" Res4dee i 1 (2 a Zfw Mould appear, proyi'de for better lkand� use transition��, whi3e aorome dating a reasonable; t'eveL of _devo"O'ppdcnt camgafible with ai ., surr-o4fiftg; land uses. ( IV? The:General Plan, describes the xW Qensity category as follows:' a "The Vow density, chii%1zteri2ed'' by single-famigy:bia s ',he den pity f �9ppropriate Mere the traitioRsti= neig;``ls®rho6d<;charffictt?1� of detacl� l"singl'e:fsmily units prevailsv and`where' the lilevel of `$ervice inc'tuding roads, shoppir4 and rettreatiot® ake rt®t cut'= ient to. justify a highe^ densi#y,M' The subject area is senni,•rurai in nature and characterized- by detached single-fmgly h(aes" with ,.no commercial estdblisaents--.r public recreation facilities°,;nearby. lU propos d -6ange `to-,Lome=density Residential, appears, consistent with theme General Plan criteria in all Auk respects. k V. EPdVIRORKHTAL ASSE S'NEMT Tile Initial Study has been co"gileSed by stai'f �I y` and ino s gn can a verse environmental impacts were identified tD be associated with.the proposal, VI. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: ShoOd the Commission, upon examination of the sutr,ec enera an Amendment and Development District Amendment, decide ;- that the 'change Muld promote -the land use goals and policies of t'fie 4 General Plan, would not be materially detrimental` to the adface►it properties or would not cause'`significant adverse environmental impacts, the following are the findings that are necessary upon. approval:. A. The WAdments do not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the .Gener&r' Plan; and B. The Amendments do promou goals of the Land Use Element; and C. The Amendments !could not bs materially Injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties; and i D. That the subject property is suitatle for the uses permitted in the Proposed district in terms of access, size', and comppatiGility with existing land use in surrounding areas. ^ R'". l .fitT F •s:.d"any `C?Y'A�tl"T `f !A CO�R9 fSS REPOftI' » .y GPPLA 86r03ti LEI 0 RAlR:tO-CllGA1NC� - , SApteaser '24, x�8r > Page 4 s , VI. CORRESPON&NC-R,:lbft ite►b has been adwectised a+ a publi, hea in�t,, n Gbe IfaT�► a oa nsp � r 7h . r0 ffletiy wasr pdsied , aitd notices wire sew o'a property.aMrttex Fw+.thir�, feet of thertr�ct°;site^ 91II REC[ i€l3DA�I0 s ff e. " apprpvel Ot i.he Atende $s If the C•a ss on ;finds, t:t AAagIRAQ s ft the {GeOer,}t Plan a da �opc rat ;,. Oisteioi: 15apS � a �� ted 'a ►A i ��f o ��tti6 Resol�RMBns,. recoaaending apprava�� Che;08,.41! Gar�si D_og �,; Genen7 P1 an a hd, Derselopsn 4r t 'a .Faeytive Otclarauit, �^ la be app�°iipr�a'' Re tfull, p�a uller city plaper ;5 x BO iRfto Attacheents: 'Ex hibit+�"V _Jr'Ah ral. Pan An_d ivelopoent Qistri.c Maps 1;.. FxxfiibiL; "t" L .e'lood .Control 'Prapertj+ Resol01 on of Approval, It r f it IN r _ -- Q - "Chaffey E College &,� �... .m..® } � . } V General Man 1 t4t F L LM® •� LIM v Hot Im Develepment Districts - t\OItTf i CI�Y ` F ITCH= 'Ar f' tS5'tl�517 Tn P -86-0 D / DDA- 6 .05 � I r 3 EXHIBIT �"� ] G � 7tj�11 1 irY(} A RESOLUTIO OF THE,. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE'CITY OF 1 RA HO CULRAlO1 ll� ChLIFgRNIA, REC.OP +1 iVDIN6 RPPR0 AL C i GEi+i ,L PLAN #U li VENT 40. 8�'i 03D - CITY'"OF PANCH0 CUC�WlONaA MENQIf4G TtlE LAND tl � .�C 1T,AF THE RAN 0 CUCAMOi ,A OE ER €.,PLAN RQM LQW-IiEDYUiR 10 NARY LOW FOR 68 ACRES LOCATED A# t.HE- SOUTHKEST' CORN£k OF WILSON AND MILL16 (WUTENDEO) - APR: _2Oi-P..1=11,, 17`t „. I t M� W HE R�.�,S, t« Planning Commission has b�ld a duly advertised publ ,: �j kaeing to consider aT ,coamiedts on the proposed. General Plan Amendment Nb,. ! 86-030. ' SECTION 1: The Rancho CUcaau hgs Planning Commission he.'*eby makes the fol i nos: A. The Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan.: S. The Amendment promotes goals:of the Land Use Element. C. The Am2ndksent would not be materially injurious, or detrimental to the adjacent properties. SECTION 2: The General Plan Land Use Map shall be amended ,as p _ follows: ENVIROk"ENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL.K AN AMENDMENT 86-03D - CITi OF MWGHO CUCAMKWV----K--requesz W amend the Land Use Element F-WY- General Kiin Trom Low-Medium Density Residential (4-8 dwelling units/acre) to Lei+ Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units/acre)4or 68 acres of land loci-Zed at the southmst corner of Nilson (if extended) and M'il'l;ken (if extended) - APN: 201-191-11, 17. SECTION 3: A Negative Declaration is hereby recommendmd for adoption by ffy-Council for this General Plan Amendment, based. upon :the completion, and findings of the Initial Study. NOW, THEREFORE, BE AT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Cormission does hereby recommend approval- of General Plan Amendment No. 66,03D to the City Council. 1 h P AN I5 I N. E 01. �, GPA 86�,dD CaI 0 n RA GRO CUC �'anury ,„ IQN° R 1�\l, IMPROVED lq ADOFfEOk THIS 4Ttf'DAIY'CIF J FItl I989, t`L1tNNIMG COmmissION'Or-TNPr;CI Ct or itAM Ho,r,uc HyA Y' Bi,'. v iv. uav n ar ,rer' Tina,r,�al ATTi,',37: ra TBUT erg Bald Bs.,l Tqir.,= Wok!,Sdt re'tary:of t e i nlgi Ca T`ssi on � the City of Ranrchd ..ucaa�anga, dd hereby cer� fy� that the Foregoin sdi4 one wa`i Wly and r��gpiar!ly �n roduced; p ss �, and ,elop't 1� y e.Plana�iag Cae�aiss Qn �,the GiCy o1°',Rae�cho Gucaorlga a a reguiatr,�etng �9'4 tpte Ptapnieg Gaa�iasidS�::,t+eld ..,• on the I�4tit day of January; 1:7BT, °by itae �oliowlnst wd�e-to-w��: r, AYEt: OM#ISSIONERS:: NOES. CiaMISSIONERS: F, .AB$ENl': COZ•N+tISSI019EQS t, i AM ,i � QQ n lF RESOLUTION ND A RcSOi,UTIi1N 'OF, THE P��ANING COMMISSION Otis" THC CITY OF _ 'I RAAN COCAM00A.>. CAiFORIA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF RA -O3ENMETGcNE ,NO: S6O CITY °I OF RANCHO "�. CUCA�. DNGA,,ARE OlNGi THE. LAND USE-,ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO CUCAl40NGEi GENE tKL' 'PLAN F-ROK LOW_PE%UK TO 'LOW FOR 68 " ACRES LQCATEO AT. THE SOUTHWEST LORHER`OF ViILSON AND MILLIKEN (IF EXTENDED) -APW, 2A1=I91-11, 17. { I ` 'WHEREAS, the Planning Commiss'lvir has held a duly advertisq'f public hearing to consider-all comqtgnts on :a iTro;msed General PT an I'aeen&ent No. ,. 86-030. SECTION 1: The Ranchn,,Cucamorga Planning Cowission .hereby makes the follow nag fin n s: k. The Amendment does Ipot conrliet With the Lind Use Policies of the Gerer'41 Plan. B. The Amendment promotes goals of the Land Use Element. C. The Amendment would not be materially injuriou or "detrimental. to the adjacent properties. =`'z SECTION 2: The General Plan Land Use Map shpl1 be im,nded as rollows: ENVIK1 ENTAL ASSESSMEN7 AND GENERAL PLAN AM`NDKENV,16-03D CITY OF WWI" cuer uest to amen a and Use-Ilementot�tTie enero „an-From Low=Medium Density Residential (4-8 dwelling _ units/acre) to .Very- Low Density Residential (less than 2 dw--114ng units/acre) for 68` acres of land located at She southwest corner of Wilson (if extended) and Milliken (if extended) APN: 201-191-I1, 1 . SECTIOR 3: A Negative Lacl ration is hereby recommended for adoption by THF—.`fi'iy"Council for this General Plan Amendment, based upon the completion and findings of.the Initial Study. NOW, THERE ORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Raocho Cucamonga Planning Comm.i'ssion does hereby recommend approval of General Plan Amendment No. 86,03D to the City Council. H-19 Px Chi `0�. � K No'. r� oE�.��o,.cuca�soNSA k 4nuaryPage 14,`198T q AFPRO Et�JAkD AbOPTED, THY 3�i:C'DAB!, Osf J�ilUARY;' I987. ; PLANNING COMKISSTON OF THE CITY_,OF "SCHO CUCMONGA BY:� av ar a map �� ATTEST: 1 Brad uer, eRu ere- rY F I, Srad Buller, Ekpp y Secretary ofrthe-'-1m4ng Coamission of thte Ci�t+ of = Rancho Cucamonga; dd h_eroy certify that the 4ore3oiing.ReSoluti_dn was du and regularly introduced,,. passed; and adopted by the,ktnniin� Cotai^sdi ft oil the City of Rancho Cucaanga`,,at regular meeting of fire P1`anni'ng Cormcf°sshe7d on the 14th'day of January, 1987,'by the fallowing vote-to wit: ,0.(Fs: COMFIISSIONERS: NgES: COMMISSIONERS: ' ABSENT: _.CPU�-l�SIONERS: t 17 a rw '•.r RESOLUTION NO. ` f i\T A RES014TIO OF Tt1E RANCHO CUMMIONCA PLANNING COMXSSION L RECO[ NDING,I QtnAL.OF DIS ICT CHANGE No. 88sDa —CITY OF R,tNCHO CUC, (V i REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE DISTRICT 3-1-1SIGNATIi)N s FR. LOW41EDIUN TO VERY, LOW FOR 68 ACRES LOCATED AT THE SOUTWEST CORNER OF WILSON,AND MILLIKEy (IF`EXTENDEDI - ii: 201-191-11, 17. WHEREAS, on the 15th day of July, 1986 an application was filed and accepted on the 4bove-described project; and WHEREAS, on ttf'14th day of January, 1987, the Planning Co mission, held a duly advertised public hearing pursuam, to, Section 65D5a of the t California. Goverfi nt Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning'Ca►wnission has made the following findings: x 1. That the suuJe- » property is suitable for the uFsos permitted in'" the pmoposed district in teems. of • access, size, and compatibility,with existing land R. use in the surrounding aria; and 2. That the proposed district change would not hi Vie" Ak significant impact on the environment nor the r surrounding properties; and 3. That the proposed district change..is in conformance with the General Plan. SECTION 2 Tne Rancho Cuca=An A !'fanning Commission has found that this pro ec w >>ot create�a significant adverse impact on, ther environment ' and recommends issuance of'a-Meoative Declaration on January 14,_1987. NOW, THEREFORIE.E It RESOLVED: ; 1. That pursuant to Section. 65850 to 65855 of the { California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 14th day of unary, 1987 District Change No. 8645. j 2. The rlanning Commission hereby µ-,comzands that the City Council approve and adopt District Change No. 86-05. _ 3. That, Certified C,-py of this Resolution and related mates 11 hereby, adopted by the Planning Commission sha-, be forwarded to the City Council _ 1 1 a 7 N, TrD 1 86^DS*,.� I, rwC}F F 'CUC,AM MA A �Yanuar 149$7 i 4 APPROVED'AND ADOPTED THISv WHOM' OP'JANUARY,1987�' " PLANNING C".ISS16 Or THE CITY OF RANCHO CUGAM;tlN`�1 BY: - Y E. DaVid 97,Mer,-Coairman' ATTEST: u Brad Buller. Deputy SpFre.W— ry, _ I, Brad Buller, Deputy.SEcrgtary of the Planning Cr tsjbn of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,ado het by certfiy that"the foregof'4g�memuti fig, duly and regularly`introduce"i,apassed, and adopted by the planniicg Co;` rian of thy; City, of Ranch Cucaeapgai, at`a regular meeting of the PlaannIng; q, eission,.held on the 14th day of January.,J987, by the following vote ti r, YES: COWISSIONERSP I NOES:. C"ISSEONERSz RL ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 4 : i n. RESOLOI'ION C`. D f, A RESOLUTION OF'THE RANCHO CUCAM08A PLANNING COMMISSION RErOME40iNd APPROVALO,:QSSTRIC'f CHANGE NO. 86 O5 - CITY OF 11Ri4CH0 ;CllWNG,.REQUESTING A CHANGE E 14 THE, DISTRICT r OESIGNAT ON" O .�OK�tlEDI11M TO L0�!`,FaR 6S ACRES LOCA1 rD AT THE SOUT EST CORN' -0F WILSDY AND MILI.IKEN (?F EXTEWED) ,AaN, 201-191-11, 17t WHEREAS,.on the 15th 4y of July, 1986 art'anplicmcion was fired and, ( accepted on the above-describ43 project; and WHEREAS, o the 14th"by of &Marv, 1987, tke Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 658,5, of, the California Government Code, SECTION 1: " The Rancho. Cucamonga, Planning Commission hLs_made the :following-fi n n - 1. That the subjW, property is suitable fo 'the uses . . permitted in t64 proposed district in terms of a access, size, and',compatibility with existing land use in the surround tig area; and 2. T+at the Apcsed Aistrict change wao-' not have ` sigaificant ia�sact�on they environa ~:,�'n nor the su'rraunding prop�rtiPs; and `•' 3. Than the proposed district change is' p, c•nfotmance with the General Plan. "! ' SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga P `i;-Ing Corer ssibn has found that this prej-e-c'F aril'[-not°create 4 sigaificant,ad+terse i-.7p on the environment and recommends Issuance of a Negative Peclaration on January 14, 1987. NOW, THEREF07E. BE IT RESOLVED:.' 1. That pursuant to Section '65850 tR 658SS of the Calif:_rria Government Code, that the, P:�anhing Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the I4th day ;,if January, 1987, District Change No. 86-05. ' 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt District Change No. 86-05. 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related mater+41 hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwailed to the City Council. r' 4-3 I - A * PLANAth G,C ISSN 0_ R L ION PIO ( ,b.. GPA $So3D�P , 0 RA �I4L' CUC �1G4 January `4, Page R. ¢ APPROVED AND MpPTED THIS 14TH DA'd of ANEIARY 1987.;, lr PLANNING C"ISSION'oF-THE' CYTY o R4NCHo C!lC�RitiN , BY: KIT sn' Hra .Y ac rre ary. 4' Brad BulXet, Dcp,utY zo�peretarjt of tho.,PlanOrg Cowsission of the City o Rancho zucamcngaiAo e* sy vArtity that the4oregoing Resolu b6 was ding and r�,�tc ariy ifltroduced, Passed, and adopted Vy' the Planning Cd3raai,asirf the City of Rancho Cwca ng4,1a a regu7r�r meeting of the Planning:Comis-ion b,ssd an the 140 day of January�..1987, bjj the foiToai9rig botg=to-wit. AYES: t' IYSSOP[ERS WES:- CM, SSIONERS* �414; a"r5r" I• CUMISSIONEM., 3 4 - HYr' ----- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - T "REPORT c.3CAMo, q� DATE:; January.;14, 1987 t9n TO: Chairman and Members ,ol the Pl'ann•Ifig;Commission ; FROM: Basrrye R.' Hanson Senior Civil Engineer' ? 8Y: " Barbara Krall 'Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: ERVII TAL ASSES�XW MD �lTATIV `PA➢ICEL MAP 10351 - Dick Sc ofifi raco, orate •- su iv s on o ' acres o aq ant 'parce is in the very low (2 dulac) Development district. located on the S"aLiszde of Iron MountsA Court, Test of Hermosa Avenue (APR \t I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action"Ri'uested: Approv=1 a"the proposed Tentative Parcel Map as shown on Exhibit "B" B. Parcel Size: Parcel No. 1 - 25,6 ri4uare feet Marcel Ho.. .2 24,227 square feet C. Exist lwo Zoning: 4 Very Low (2 DUAC) OeveloprwAM� District .. Sur.f.nding Land Use: hz,"k - Vacant 1 South_- Vacant East - Vacant West - ;lacant j E. Surrounding General Plan and Development Code Dezignations: 1 Nort'i - Very Low (2 au/act, `r li South - Very Low (2 du/at' Fa,,t Very LGw W"t - Very;Low (2 duJac) Site Characteristics: ,Ertel l of the site contains a re=ervoir which is to be removed with the .development of the parcel. Parcel 2 is vacant. - f. ITEM I P11�e:,ing COmmission SV`ff-Report Tentative Parcel''Map mb.z. 10551, Dick Scott, Inc a j1 January 14, 1983' _ Page: 2 / II. ,, SIS: The purpos3 of this map is. to divir,, a 1.12 acre parcel into 2 custom single family 'residential lots, ane.. rcel to be suba�vi'ed is Lot Number 4 of T^rotative Tract 12902 (Exhibit:"c8) which way appr�1,� by the Planning C�rmnia,sion on tEpril 23, 9t36; The two parcels Yo oe created_ will be,,compatible An size and Oape with the other parcel-s of„Tracts 12902 (see Exhibit ,"D")' ,ti F The erVjnal Lot Na: 4 was created f ntent�ionally larger than,ths otk,ers'• - in order to assure that a su•eficieni area Was provided for an exiSt,I g water reservoir on'tl±A, site. The baveloper;•Etas stated that he has been working with the oV.t'er5 of $he rights to the reservoir and wi i7:?have their approval of the ,subdivision prior to Final Map, recordation, which �s a condition of approval of this map. III. ENVIROAMENTAL REVIEU: The applicant cwsIeted Part I._of the Initial Stuff.:Staff coiRFucted anfleld 1 restiRation and cort�a P;' art 11 of the Initial Study'. No :zdverse(I impacts .up2n the eniiroPm1,.t -are I. anticipated =5_a result of Ws protect. Therefore, issuance of Negative Declaration-ii appropriate.` I4►. CQRRES:�iDENCE Notices of,r50blic Hearing halo been sent to sur-rounding property owners and placed1n the-0_j{,'ja Report �iwspaper, Posting at the site has also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recorrmnded that the Planning Commission consiae'r all input an -'elements of .the Tentative Parcel Map. . 'If after such consideratton, the Commission can recommend approval, th,"r the adoption 'of the attached Resolution and issuao.:A of a Negative Oe4laration would ?A" be appropriate. Respectfully,stibmitted, f Barrya Hanson Senior Civil Engineer BRH~BK:pm Attachments: Vicinity Map (Exhibit "All) Tentative Map (Exhibit "B") (Exhibit "Ca) (Exhibit 6019 Resc"Ution and Recommended Conditions of Approval r „ WA ell 4fl6V7DA9 Ai80ffi to l i 1 ♦ site � I AVm Pam"awe ( I HNLLSl�E R® N CIrff OF T=b-PARR L SAP' ,1 QA R I J -3 � . N T (,jam V ----..s�.�_ QS '� sRLPan[.'6Y: p}7 PARCEL MAP N 10351 �sd��avT�px�lTn"VCl, F� CGTO\Wl.a93y IN,THECITYOFRYNCHO CUCAMONGA HMO A sU091VISI0N G LOT4 OF TELTATM TRACT N0.1290? �. UNRECOAOEC 1N SAN OCANAROINO COUNTY,$TATE OP CALIFORNIRw OWAtR.S•APPLICANTI a0 .. NI.acac. � 114 WEST Nt1�TN STREET f UPLAIMCAI.!FORNIA 91786 996.1602.!'1 1111111 UTIUTY!:OHFANICS PYCY105Np SEYIYtCG q /'b:.nCNML(Lf..7el U@T'.a440t1\AAB'Atat_DIZ.T2ttT k - �6i�6fA p r.p NA'I aWSL Se�m1 GAS-SOUTNLRN CALIFORNIA GAS A BTFJOy.Kara Gu :tt Gbti.t we aP 75ca.ura $TB t�+uNd ar 44 ae� esa RVINo,u. Ltl"i/.T1A11 r.IvsT., /.ywty r"SIIL it Hp.fwmxt Kpy�NCOGnLYE'vb POWER-SOi1TNEAN CRURORNIA QOISON tii Pl+l4aLY NCp1Bt77bbNksafN.2,MTL tABN�OIT A491 e.¢RYtlt;l0 597A 1'-40' TkL.O\Triyq(q}R{i[,y itlONlOJyyY.TiI I\fptQ ONLY pNTAiy1 c�G. [NI;WIT&OF TU6 WOeDa�Aee++teWfi.5 17HT96`�k•tT4(e 9 rAa r%vp"B Lw«B'ust.w a"...t?ur, RNIBfK,��,. YELEFNONa:-GEtM t.TELEPNONI: - r WATER-CUCAMOHGACOUNYY WATERO4TRiT fib tt� ft Af�BINo Ra L �i Z90 tl ' 1, a .® ex ` �Y t�>•y �lMJ y!t Q � � i i •r,M„ �t(y 1... VI. �, PAACfL r barJ.o.•+.I,;s. .urcl.rsr �. I L lt�c Z1,' VL }t VICINITY MAP : . rr .II61lt7Yr A ` t!6°tl►Y66.66t°.1ffii,Yl1'Oq°LRel1 • Ff ea�oarssa®m°mreiwt>r?rroa- _ •� .._ :: t i �,::�daivl+roitae ` ,i m S i4 u LOT y ! CUM OF ITM. AP 103-KI SU64tvisloN OF LOB' ENiG9TG ICE ON Exmm.�, -���'-_ ---�•- - - --ate•- --- •-�_`.-- �= %�D'' �.__.�- � j� , 6 a•. (4P,:d3 Z 3 ry L P3,7lod �3sP36- `- fill' it 'PARCEL I 2a,53 ) � pRCEL 2 3 22--? i a T t RESOLUTION _MO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSI11 OF THE CITY OF M RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MIDITI1INALLY APPROYIWG. } TENTATIVE- PARCEL MAP N'UMBFa2 10351 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Numbe.r 10301, submitted by Dick Sects, E ina., applicant,, for the purpose of subdividin'tl into 2 parcels, the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.] County of Can Bernardino, State of California, identiflid as APN(s) .201-&7',-26, located on the South t side of Iron Mountain Court, Blest of Hermosa Avenue', and WHEREAS, on January 14, 1987, the Planniiag Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above-described map, NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHG CUCAMONGA PLANNING COWISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: U Si CTiON 1: That the follov.4g findings have;been made: 1.� That the map is consistent with tl& General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is " consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the safe is physically suitable for the- proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements Will not cause substantial environmental, damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutt,!nq property. SECTION 2' That Tentative Parcel Map No. 10351 is hereby approved subject to�tFie"ittached Standard Conditions and the following Special Conditions: SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1. Prior to recordation, a Notice cf Intention to join Landscape and LigNting -Districts shall be filed with the City Council. 1,10 engifinering cost involved in District fonyl,lion dev�eloaer. shall he borne by the 2. A 1151 private Equestrian Tri l Easement shall be provided along the south property lines of Parcels'1 and 2. 3. Prior to recording, a deposit shall be posted with the City coverirg the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under the Alta Loma Channel Assessmept District between the newly created-parcels.Amok ' 4. Tentative Tract Map 12902 shall be recorded prior tr.:the recordation of t:ha parcel map. 7 RESOLUTION Tentative Parcel Map:No.. 10351: January.14, 1987 Page: 2 Ruilding Divisiar. i. A11 required drainage m.ease nts, per review - ! approval of the Building Official,-,-shall°be shown of the final ma c 2. Prior to recot0t,4oh ui `fi6ai'mao, 1the.,_applicant ska,11 provide pen�of that net other pi ty has cglafm to the ,u`se of the reservoir and,_either remove or bond,416` the removal of the'.'reservoir. The reservoir-steal I `. be removed at(the)om 2of street construction o0erations- 1 P?gOYEDrrA4D AgbPTED THIS 14TH DAY .` JANWRY, 1987. PLANNING COWISSIOM'OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 5avid Bar kw-- a rn'A�s < - ATTEST: 'era w I-VeyDeputy cre ary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify,that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly intraduced, passed, and adopted. by the Planning Ci i fission.of the City of Rancho Cucandnga, at a eegular•meet'hg of the Making Comission held e on the 14th day of January, 1987,"by thkv id-aowlos vote-to-wit AYCS: CMISSION€RS: i MoEk: C"ISSIONERSs ,ASSENT- COMMISSIOMERS: 1,1 If Alt Co TS Yp yr q � XI jiglip Zfa! g all jXI ' - E II 34 R w -3 AS ^ „� iz �ffi �¢ .: � ��• i sZ "fig' � 2� y .. 3.5 a �.p �" p� p w Al Sx `a ZHU L �� o Ny. p �t.. = �� d.l■pl8 ��pQ, �4� �V �ppL6IM a `-It ZF 15 4 ^ @ffi Esj T � 4� 4N �O OO y�. AaNCt ` Od qi®0 ell 03.0 h -� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAi ONGASTAFF REPORT 14 i� OAiC: January 14, I987 19n TO: Cnafrman=Mnd Members of the"Planning ',ommission ' FROM: Brad'Bslle"r, City P]anher, f BY: Naacy 79, Associate Planner StiBJEC f« COt1OIT 1 L m PERMIT 86.32 (SI f± RPQiiQYRt PAT awi�re.gues to aa. a con can or approval o an ex` 'ng 'shopping center located at the northeast corner of; grchibald Avenue'and I th Street APtI 202-171-461 Sl' p .> ��hraugh 5G. L. PROJECT AND SITF. DESCRIPTION: � f` • A. 'Action Requested: Approval of Canditional -Use Peilkt B. Surrounding Laird Use and Zoning: ortn Y4"Rr., LOW Residential District'(2 4 du/ac). South - Existing Single Family homes; Low Fiedium Residential District (4-8 du/ac). East , - Apartment;-Medium High Residential District (I4=-24 du/ac), )last - Vacant;'Kediium Residential district. (8-14 du/ac). C. General Plan lesignations: r—daecsr5 - e var ood Commercial. f North - �e Lour De,,%Ity Oaidentiail (2 4 du/ac) _ Soltth Low M6diu&:Oensity Residential (4-3 du/ac), Eat - Medium ifi ` ensity,RWdential (14-24 du/racl. lies - Medium Density :Residential (8-14 do/ac). D. City.Characteristics- The project is the fully dev(Aoped Statdr ro ers snap ng center at the northeast corner of 19th street and Archibald Avenue. II. ACYSISt A. deneral: The existing shopping center was approved by CounU nder a Site Approval, and was built before the incorporation of the City. A new 4onditfonal Usia Permit number was ssigned to this Site Approval for administrative purposes. ITEM j` PLANNING COtIS$ION STAFF REPORT CUP 97-66) - PATTOlJ f January 14, 1987 Page Z "t The Planning Commission, at its regular amdetiPq o7 oecer 4er 10, 1986, revl,*d and a",roved a Minor Development Review (MDR 8&- 25) for tie routine �ai�ntenance of, the building a,zt upgrading ,Af I`aOdscapi ng'twifili the addi ti onal' t ee�'.and taxi'en try wal Ts, ne ol, rniing.comifision Wicated to the appbcaht their pniicy �pn mopping centers to require evi,ew and anpeoval of ,l exterior arch "tectural modificati� s inc.#uding mate-761s and color prior �,o commom7ement of wont.., The developer has agreed o add this recoi%ended condition to Itit, aroject a�v fol lows All future exterior &xhitectziral modifications` *�raiing materials, calbr and landscaping shall be.reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission prior to issuance of building V&rrotit and/or coeraencement of work.. 11I. FACTS FOR FINDINGSIA 1. That thie prop6' ed use with the added condition 1is�Jin ,accord with the 8eneral Plan, thta-6-616ativw of the Devjlopmei:t Code, _ " = and the.purposes of the district in;which the si i is located. 2. That the prcposeu uFe, Aogether with t 'd condi ons applicable thereto„ will not b'i de"rimental to thh publ is areal th, safety, or welfare, or materially i uolous to properti^ c improvements in the vicinity. t 3. That the pvloposed Use complies With each of the applicable provisions e.f the Development Code. IV, CORRESPONDENCE: This item tv 5, been advertlted,.}- a public hearing n e a`i yy eep rt newspaper, property-posted ..od 'notices sent to all p Wer y owners within 300 It, et of the project. V. RECOt+1 !ltiATION: Staff recoo ends that the Planting Cc4missi-on. approve ,'T r.,Itional donditlon for Corditiontl Use Permit 86-J2. + Res fully subgdtte Kira ul er c. City Planner 8B:NF agr Attachments: Exhibit�"A` - Site Plan Exhibit "B" - County Approved �ardtipns Exhibit "C "- County ;Approved Lai0scape Exhil it "D" - Aduition of ,1,Andsct0e/Low Entry Ball Resorution of Approval J 2 I wF 71 . 1,1 III eTATAR U.Rae.l l C==) 1 ./A Qi r _j ---------- NORTH U ..�. NINETElTif + a Tr7`LF= --ff, PLANNING DiVIJtC3.'r4t F-xHIP1T, .sc1LE I, ;_ ,, �. ::� r „, :, :}' Y„ �•� !• � r ��Irl� ' j i�x� r {����� t e 7� .b ! �M� � I��r� i Ix �/'• a� �G�i r� � `"t��i� 3 It U ilt '5 1� jliri[U+� 16 >1 if 1 ti� � � S� k i1 'i ttl 7 r r S !r Y r.^— �Rr I ��iF' •! .41:_4 a�� �'��� 15-^ a.:k�:� Y :�` b� i �� 1 A � �j � � j :�t N 7r t 1 -k j" eaars ea�aae o co i C c= C==Y f. yy4 tl ( j� "'r(7r--7� 11 O t aAOr- _ J DANK FOOD Ii tz NORTH CITY ®i` ITEM RANCHO CUCA VIONGrp TITLE: �e PLANNING DIVISION EXHIMT-_.A—5C,M—' S3 t ly IA CRI [` - �-d > °' - - Con clob cam. XF 77 F � - ; .:•t�tx nrcaar a v w w m nr. �• lnuaru,,c,fey •mwt rt..r ""po MUM= M*Wft 3 '. � __ �"'m. `a�::+-fit'.. nte•e �e� •uctrwr + CTIT OF sv .�_.. STATER BROb ZKWI kj e _ 4 all 1 t L j CM OF .� PEANMM �Y' /,-4-07 i d Van M& on gym- &,%Vs —� f—_77—T-7 �A�1 13 ray I � ���• � � irk- SLEDowl NORTH a�ax�n sr. r-ac-o• G� Ol O C) TMEi �,�► EXMT_ SCAM, .. le, >-f - Y v - n fi M s MW AML NURTH Cir CF MEM, AiM PLAMM, acxv EXRW:— lp-lc f -, � ^ HMm Ate'bid. S t!LffVAI ION NOM CI _ 197 _ • � --,t` " �q 4 j 920 Hit. eAM,," AV CO ( S� G�;4.4. MCA% Crr I' - 11 � i T CF RAI--X,M CIS T.-n t d n- NNNG U SCALE=----- - p •:,�'^.,..y ;rf ,u�a 9 �fr _+� "A,°°"E. ... t'T:�`y '`�°� _>^^c. ^'F:Prs�-.i RESOLUTION 110. ARM OF TJiE 1t1)NCHC CMAMONGA'PLMNI-,NG:CtkiMESSION APiYRO"ING�4ONDIX,10NAL USE P•ERhiT (SITE A$P)fJ Ad 97 66) FOP1 AODi,1a 0{��OF h,-'ONO 10 OF:��tPPBDV�� pe�tl�tRlFl]G � x P4.AA�NIp1G�C01FlI'SSIO� 16�t10� EFt DOE ALL EXT Xa)R, 'LF CR?IONS �' LOQ TED iA13 Ti E' NOR5F6 a CORN �,- OF Oni �, � BEET b ARCHIEALD'R ENUE`I'li Utr.,MHBORHO0D4PONERCU,L , k!CT WHEREAT(, tip the, 20th ..day of ` bvegOeo. 1985, a cn�plete: aoo]icat on was filed b Mii.,�lael I�D, Ratton :for review of t{e ab© P� descri'bed'pr3eot; and i I WIiCREA'S, nnilthe, 4th of January, 3987, theRat G a Cucamonga Planriag Commission .held"a;uMc�tea-frig to consider the aoove-descrilred_.peo3ect. G NOW, THEREFORE; 'the-R06w Coca 4nga Manning Co�nission resolved a4' fol Lows: SECTION 1' i• That the following fioli�tips can`be met: y 1. That the praposed.usc with th'J ade'.ed condition°Is iri accord -��h `th4•40neftl plan, thy,objectives of the t Oeval of L` Cody 4nd the purposed'.or the di-.vtrict \ in VAidl, tocaied. 2. That the proposed•use, together with the'conditfons applicable thereto, wil1. not be drotri�='.ntal, to the \ public health.." safety, :or welfane, o materially injurious to proportiet' or irdpnvements ' in the vicinity. S. That the proposed use complies with each of the apipli cab]e provisions of the Development Code. SECTION z: That this ,project,As exempt ''from environmental evaluation a—�sB on California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Article 19, Section 15301, the m1roe alteration or maintenance of existing public or private structures. SECTION 3 Than Conditional Use Permit No, 86.32 (Site Approval' No. 97-65) is approve subject to the following condition; 1. Ali future exterior architectural modificai(ons including materials, color and landscaping shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission prior to issuance of building permit u and/or commencement of work. '.I ALA [t?"771 n•' +vT.# r QRM F I' ' x1 a+V j i'LANI�TNG`�CyC�,l SIO F�sOLU +O+V NO;, V :4: � CUR 862 a SI�i E' gRi30Y1 .9 D7- 6), PATCdlN � January, 14; i987` a s x �j Rage 2 ti r i- � ": ✓ "k. . APPO{i Ahi? ADOPTE ,4I344TH DAY OF"4ANUAR'Y, 1987., . ! ' "PLANNING t;OMMI SSION'OF THt,CI;3Y 3©C ttAN�l�'CUS;AMONG�K` Bl�,�, av�cI ar ar,� airmam. . � AT SS�h Ter, pep!ILy 5 eora ar;; Brad, -*fl7e►, Doputy .Secretar'y. of the PY4nning .:oarrass-fon of the pity. of i3anctto Cud\ tsnga, d fy tiacir tht.faeFofirrc,�:Nsoiuito Duly and '. regularly i�ltroduc id as`sed, n r ad�tp A by +e �annire i issirn arc City of Ran % Cucar�aA t a ui ar et36g of tfle,.pla�sM,�na C fi ion bit", 14 r on the 14th ,V of Jaauar�i 1987D by the foii.o rPng vote to- ifi. f AYES: �1'4t3WIs4ONERS !TOES: CZrissIOilLt S :G ABSENT: CL�1�I;ESIONERS: - ); � 1 ri = A _ ~3 ;5=`r CITY OF RMCHO CUCAMONGA A STAFF REPORT F Z ;U 7 DATE: January 14, 1987 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Ilanning Commission FROM:: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner SUBJECT: FATERTAINMENT PERMIY 86-01 - MAGIC LAMP INK The review 'of providing -five entqrtainment In con unction with a restaurant"use'l located at ir189'Foothill Boulevard. 1. ABSTRACT: Durin 1986, the City Council adopted the attached r3�'i"Hance ;egard ng.,` regulation of entertainment uses. =�FThe Ordinance- requires teat establishments which provide entertainm-nt must obtain an Entertainment Permit from the City. The applicant ' is requesting review and approval of an Entertainment Permit for a live band and dancing in the bar. II. ANALYSIS: The Magic Lamp,,Inn is primarily a dinner house with four NOW anquet ooms available on two floors and two permanent bars serving beer, wino and alcoholic beverages. Entertainment for customers of the Magic Lamp Inn is provided by-.small hands and on occasion by individual performers playing music�l instruments for, the listening r%easure and/or dancing of patrbtis. Currently, entertainment `ts _arovided seven days per week according to the applicant. Sunday-and Monday evenings from 8 p.m. until Midnight, and Tuesday through Saturday from 8:30 p.m. until 2 , .m. The band and/or entertainers are located in the bar area and there is no admission charge. Mr. Anthony P. Yernola is the Manager of the Magic Lamp Inn and is responsible for the managemdnt of the entertainment. In accordance with Section 5.12.040, the Entertainment Ordinance,, the applicant has indicated that neither the applicant or any persons responsible for the management or supervision of the Magic Lamp Inn has, within the previous ten years, been convicted of a crime nor has the applicant: ever had any permit or license issued in conjunction with the sale of alcohol provision of entertainment revoked at this establishment. Section 5.12.130 of the Entertainment Ordinance requires that a duly licensed and uniformed security guard shall be r in attendance at all times where dancing is permitted or allowed if the dance area is in excess of 150 square feet. The basement the Magic tamp Inn contains a dance fluor/dance area that exceeds 150 square 'Net in size which ie used at times for dancing. This c: ITEM K ?.T' IB4,. 9I j11 Spt � R PQRI' 03,E � ;1 64ry,14,, 194�- Paget tjlot 1 AMIN R Ordinance dcxe�s, �rw require the applicaut to supply inforia,tion y a�3ra#`q erg,s sk;4rity gupr& its currently proVIA and the appli',4a_�` s, 141, 0d,'Auch`in"their Wi1catien, 7h` refore„ S atf" eul �a k, diUdn,,of'Approval to provide a so kj guar4.�or a t`�•; etinraeniR Pei�sit, k III. FALTS, The Magic LaaJp inn . a�,d �35ociated en`ier a con uc�ze, in. a .safe and; orden%,;y 0 ner. Fulrthe the a,ppliceot hasi.r at0, 4ott nef'thee, the ipi f ant: or any:other. ` persoi„MM as5n ated it1 "a .ge eC"t a;; tupRr,visio�e of the ag c Lamp Tin have Rot�' Baer a n�vic of any offense involdb the presepjtation, exhibi t oar p�erfor a�ce of any )Wscana vsn�`'cf any kind or of a fglot�+, oil airy crisse 'rnvoivng ma� l turp3i de„or has" had any a0proval pea^ i't or lic9sise is5"' 1 in confunc�v�*-f En he sale of alcond� $ha; pr�o�isiofl� of enter i.na�ent revraRed � , fin-'the f preceding five years Appgoval of thus Enterta!l at: erm- could not create a'public~,nuisance ar' a%tehfere wi.tli the ,peace)and quiet o of the con: *ini.um or apartment unift it the surrounding n0a4borhood. :c't°a best`of St f!5 knos�rtedge,. thV,applican _has not made any YA so. :eleadi,ng'or• fraudu3 ent statehaents of teria] l m. fact in the requir`"ed applieatians I� IV RECWthD!�TION Staff recf!t ends .tc`, , the; Planning Capeaission t con s ;nai7y aPpr., mV an Ente'rta�l�at Perm for the Magic Lamp ` Inn 1h6ugh adoptfion, of the attached Resolution of Approval, �u ` Respectfully submitted, c Brad Buller City Planner BB:DC•te Attachments: Application f' Resolution of Approval Entertainment Ordinance 4� PAT AND tiARVANliE VERpWS AV,4C W IN 8189 FOZ,3011 atvd.,CUCWWVJ8i CA 91730 � PhWW(714)�lc W8 Septer�be3" 3, ','1986 �x.8659 f Application sor "Entertainment•rermit," by (1) Magic Lamp T ccn, Inc. 819 P'oothi ll 'Blvd, Cucamongxx, Calif. eT"Sb ' (2} Pe' F. ;iTernola President 1604 Nd. Laurrl Ave,: uple.,W, Oali"3`. =86 { Anthorw L*< Vernola Vice President g18?4 FaQth ll Blvd. Cv;;amongs, Calif. 91730 T'crsald B. Secretaryftreasurer 8827� La En s Av(F t Whittier, & "42f• 9Q51 (3) Snterts nCs ll t for customers of the ):agiC Lamp Inns Inc, is provided Ask by small baika and on occasion by individual performers playing, rtlmsical insents for the listanJWS pleasure rInd or dancing, (4} Currently eni 19ment is prov=%eT•s-e days p �"' idsy and Monday evening y�.s,�y P,p�F u it �dnite � thr____ A irlSa from 83 30 P.M. W-V 2':Z M. �r,� band a or, efitertai;a are located in the hpiz' Thera W do admissioyVfen, (5) Mr. Anthony P. Veraola-!lE tbe Mr4nsger of i'resta and is, respensCble for the prav3l . g the.:errtinment. (6) The Magic Lamp 1,,,nn, Ine. is pi Y., uperior dinner douse, with four banquet rooms avai.lab:10 ucc. V`"q�and two permanent bars,, serving beer, wine and alcohtr '-;ev agb * (7) The respensirle persons in management have never been convicted,of a crime nor have ever been indicted in a situation including condition,q of parole or probation. (13) NO Permit has ever been, nor ;any license has ever been revoked in conjunction with the sale of alcohol or provision of entertainment. We are enclooing the sum Of Forty Dollars for the year 1986 per your paragraph 5,12.110 of the 'ordiwAnce No, 290, prior to Nover6oer 1. 1986 per peragraph 5.12.12!0 of said ordinance. ,! S erely Submitted D B. B d � Secretary/Treasurer k—es elmle,NCa no.259, i,,, ttw � :O�T71+u11Cf QY tDE Cl'xf 60QAs:1L #�"`ts Q;tX s)F 3a1Gts!s •:� CQC�i}G4, C�LDB�IA,: d11411ED+`. 513�7P `3 dit'3`M�< 1+1itC1{0':' C0 C411QICL lBfpxIP `.CpD1 `AI�IIiC ! ksi C ^L5.32.' +� Ax'IP11ZD"Lik^.OtDT'xs$t��OAt'[tT/t1o1R�x'�r 1ms 4;C coasclL ?$a cx3r iiylcra CaC♦ a DO u .C�171.>, tfGMl1 awl: lY'Cle, Of'46R 3sft5 `Cgespazia+htR�ava ecru is hero aysa ed.ha th'o d ttof tfa`aso.Chaptar , Z tR,raa'd� art it sad fisaves. 4 w q =c _;.d l.11 a3s 61Psrttaid�tat•a�sfifad. _ �� '>034 fleoi`foia.,.. '+ J.1$Q4Q � eatioa ltsr+YKsatt« q� 3 11aq'S3 . st 'atisa^as! saii 5 it U4. Des of 1s11.D�o tseit'a of lts:trleg 9sat�L ot,.aFPlioariWa. +� � S. .Diit CI"gi:saa is acf4h aa'FsagtC. �, 9 1#dDO ldsppagi.Ra ar iov eapUs*a! oei 9 1,3 XZti 'fiat^tor sfil�s¢ �ityttisa. es, tr 0"A at�giiw is+!after.. 5.11.1i,Q 6apter tort;OV4* ,. ' 3 1Zp1s30 Trolibitira�sW�paailtra � 3.iitiisis3 Ciai�•rsa�i{tR'xtrai`rah"iwa Oit! >.aty{�e rarcir.! "� + 7►o parssa or Graiaase sstftg shall opsrake,,cptducCt ac K4 a�F Zilsas er ATApgsta open to the tic aoisare food."cc bcrarAus***'11R1d. tff tea fW idle, aO gdYw avO, awt w4tre- sap Fp attsrteill"24 as dafiaoot tsiate. i peslrrf+ied Rr fasaisCsil o iliac form o of oDtai f6 a persAW so to do as i age uafaar pev tiiA spar to t?is chapter. w » live eaeet -R it Ded• satartains"t eosse�ssarp`orr of ' Ssiteeat,slatio, Sala b=*A or arc0gstru.Wit, Plana- burlesque agars fsaalo shot b rwiMG pastoai7toa Be-MK. soft e4 dsate, set orrsor�t, out dates t axt, orr aoa? other skit or parfpraeatb partbipotsd in'by sae air sw-a yaraasa fbt the ptxirssa Ofhclsltlt tha,atteetiat of. oit" attaat€aai.cud iot7est of,, di�srtiog at 4assiss J"Ota or pa sec, r r n Y n +t1m.auie�+ Aa proripioas of'dlit Chspift *halt sot is de+W is rgatru a par sdt for Wa folloriws: , ;t) TQr tgs atas Cf'tt sadia at other alsettlido41 playback device is any dui iEiehamat, a"spt vbns utilised 8p as Ataaktrs4sr ar 'disc 3oaitag vita at sap. taste'Orevides say farm of-vaaal setdtaiamtatr ittludiag she auaasaciftj of sayt ritlilA or artteta• onto is eer3rstccias:-tkiareYitb "t ) for ass satartaieaeett .ptasidad far 4"isra axd„tt4r guests at a private club vista admiscioa is set op" to tgr pabli4» f "(31 srtertuia7eft ooadsaCsi is Cafasetlal With a rajtolarly established aat,04 glr.c.\4 tkaetro. tvateattut park,circus, ttr i44tsroW4. ' { Os t s�4� Ya Sgarartaiosm`r'F -00uctat by ar spotaarod Dg hf£da 'Alpphb; a4c+a4y oz os atas4tion„ Organisms, iacarpor4e d f4i"ssuyo1'st�t, ghari 'd taEtic or litEr:rg- gutpgaga. b"iap as eatebY abad sts6rre.4ttP., < + mh�ith ! l a i Rstiaa�cC se44ir iatorraYi of not laso•t6a¢ants a- eq ¢ � t4►th ForkJ;� +ohea kacarode.�,.if aaf. arir€r�e ftaa eaeEt aartasss aaaat aYa e1} rl F+sca pnpmat of,Ilwtab eYv'. toC£ ty.afi a.eac�lytis . mnt4xtaiavwst pvc0ided solely, bg a picas ,pkagar ar ,, ',isspiat 9layi# music #ag. tot a�aseawt(2 ,at Gaadg. Pat chi of as Ser,61 siirig►t 1 F,r � Tor solely as bs i6 A4 y Div as !w loeatiaa+ekiab is asewsi as aa�ogs7atK qx. oL �aswed bg. to, or, fr the t;nitad l iw d v ai4°te�* 4,CaYi#aitd p Carstg•-of 'sea lear"gaiao�,'or,-_ao • a4ef„or ,tU20 .. �3aigo+G�iL=.iiLtf#LeYi'm �`"b•. "•ram aPPYfCss$II atoi'katertai'a�+�kt ,. F'+irdta� elf t$Y vri sc`.. o iri^ And,rwriiisd-ippYiaat#a Via the tity, Pd aanaa$exr Lw�iq d4aitaaa Ekabitat3 " - . 14X,i,7 a sus asd..pwraeaegat•s6dzasta oil a}p2LeasF: .� w'{�2B the aawMr w a" ead ,aTTIMt-.„ —dream of of the aPFt f3 c iifr�paa esdeelg - ' „ 4r nae lattit;s ite,es�al'aaj',�af iasesiporttion a� �tbs�rpoliasat�ieaY�°eale�.tba ',��I` aaaa a%d Xcasidiice addzea a# eeabf" oiC�thaxsf-ktao, 9lzattora. rMd' aaeb r y 4exEi�#des a�iy, sat isse;tip exaseei Liet-Psteaie of tnr:wC,a4, # the �', chtPo N Yf CIke Epl+Iie. n¢is a iarCsexml�iyc °Ds EpWioatfaw,0a21 mitor tks " wanes•. LM_xaside'cea addisbrar<;of ca4s2w mk`tbe,gawDarEt iaelmiis,¢ i`ia£tad i "�3B R,l4tc3Yad dsr tipeiae of tie propaaad sat3q"Faiiaeetie. I ' irrl iss. tw ,a!'aaoartaia�aaxc. 'sawdear of p5^ea®+v aven - ia' the vattata£ Yvc, sot aag „Cart�Car'iafax�atiae abaa{?tke metortaiaw4nt ar per owsartais'.ris. as tRs eitl aaeaagea sag daias aazoaoeasg. " "$aB AataQ 1{90t0 uad %*catias vhstte'tkt extertaiasaat is psopcscd to be ctstlntad. an Oa sdsdviiea.fes, It A", to bs ebargow. c f "(S) Tba•tavae or news of 64 pars"or paraaaa rsspassib24 for tAa wraaagewe ser tupaxroipaaA of tpFliasmt'a 6aoia4ss aaQ a wg aatartaisreat. 1ti y y. A e:a`atsat�t of the eatat4 ant e6aaa;F� a applicant"a 1 .� txs�alYea,3x a¢g. to is,:arrisd ;oofp�t is taejsxt£aa sit4 ,�1aet� ostasteiasaat, r' i iacladiag ebseCaE at a�at alcabaT 6ii1 is maned as past: t,bab husinet4. -. gAathsr ovnot tha,-"EpAlmost or may pecans ar pusaus ierapayrife14:far t1i ease or -a%p�et!visiot of agplieaat'a''business bars brie,rnStbi'►,>3g,@ssvioaa ¢ 7 7<'tattsieesd of a erirsx "a aatrsa of each ocamsas,rsb he,ssate"a s4caiti4 'therefor including eaaAitirca of a Y4 or Firo=cY.oa�a if et�r. , p s4 13teaaa isoned"tic roa;th"Or 3aact os,aitbApthe wale of cslcokal bad iniout or peoriniwa of i �' as;artltiwar�xt tar*". iasiadift t14 der* tbareaf *Ad Paso of the serekia; It *0) axiat Other as tba city aaaagar, or daaipse,my dom sateetarr. rrs y , fg I r E nc No y Sltn iever dn."L■rem—Fa°tF"', mLtEY Pbs y , i te 3 onaiaIv$iaei'ao Paa ide m"Aser� r,u7�: oa, sad vsata 3oao o!�au� applicpeefear a " gr beta eon l�eeed ,6a` mbll tsoee tbo apii z �Pl n fmssa3 i'; t off, f g After lba ei Z7: rlaaga liu utbe spp2iemt3ca !off 6 'ing �ha ahmll csarAo aet$ceagf the bsar$ h o[7 ' i11'pLO�� aril r3t6i® ►hr hasdtad f® E of fhq' �gea tO lacae$oa o bm,afpAicait a bariemimea vartithe �� P� sat o 4I 1m ,oal+ ea e;anosa. , s -�;M 4alMeedl�aa�1e3aR;a`gtfca� ; ?� �I 2 ba smi Lcffpi���tabha party,omarti m 4a s aa�e `s"�o mast egmsbs' aasaaamrat'pall - .Rs.,.�-sbgEeeaaa ap,blda antzea Ee'.ba dit$oaaAiy, eta c$cy y pasto3 ak t o 1'a°cat3om mcs h ihm camdaoaAl 11 mpeias p�ov#dsq:far;4s eAis eaeti�a s a�t�bla�m ebm�foem aim• �'smkPrrms�;ye.��r,,.c``.��� aec.eae. ape sfp$'3csaC r6 1 baas�`El`e.etovar� : p2, �:od'pasei� � s r .ac t arfeaCaa C,ql. Pieg, p!$a�� ' eac9",a t$es{ sad �boll2rayrcmc" �ec�at eo6bggria► toEEy eawret for a�ritSfl beap66di +Afl$Ltiom Y2ora to"Pay yw .oOYts by eba ppacna - f !tea eo,d boo a�glioat$gao � ■a,• nta a�-'�,. ■era.","��,a Oe ebap'Lr} � 4 r`� M r IV l+as act for Public bassi sere +sq°aPPA'iagKort�aed, err be'��natiaced �laeeai`�pCq .a$oaab$ii ko. ama datdaea`a2 �• ay,ta°aay, t6o ralsirant� te'� ib a �' �'t�_a f tps si}d ovisfuneo �; 4� �f a r v f�i'3taat :�sri abpoiwsaor�,� ley i, as veil a& the i` aatsttsiet:'.s propDiei; daeltoi�. eAa setszn kaia'locatipo`af:aka pzapesed z t •a ii'd -•-6wa# 1 of fa s1 SA is l 4� j' 6efira Cbs Praasing� Cas�maib.3 At the,sor�Imaiam ms j eba'Laer st f�[1 Lioaalr `(trot. err das3 t!e applfcaetgs 'e$docimliasm ehab'4 be�e nii awl atpeaad£m adcordsmla yit eba,Ptawa$onm,aP g.neismFl�'R3:6Egg,ail she ti aA[� Caeaaaafe 3sftipal dk8a feai $aailsi'os obmilba.4e:a Porsi m a Esrolxtiem mb'c$ n9aC2'ioPadnnsdratSl3ia thi>ieT ;(3�} daya'aftyy.�agab deed,a$om i AfAtk is xasderad 'Qoe�P'!a�.�'{Co�geior'mrx easy'aai�k� iOr'am i!$t•ahaYL'ffal:' a(77 2�e��aidaat of thq ast+alish�ot or the greaRi� O eppli; t$a®soayd be coatssry:te ebe tvxblis O! baaltb. aafe ey rorala 6r oe2fska; ' `}\ ' sn"filagal. $m, �}ar r s lycc oiiie�osh�t in like! to be operated it 7 ho applicant or exy1Ather Meam,asaeciated with bin ea PCihaipa! Or parthft.or is a*coition or+ easily ia$ol eg Tartiel or tgeor eoaezol sear t mrxRdepst at the`►niiasrn&&which amok pa*r is moeght to be is`Wd'ban ,baam aoasideN in off, ea> eoart, Q: cOspatsnv 3ur$ediction of say aa�forels iqg eba,pzeaemtstiom. rabi Lois or performaLe Of any obscaas ahem f.1 asy biad, er cf a fateap or O9Aaay ozira IMve2si aara ,eoYPiEndr. cY F but bad any eppreeal..per dt or Eicsoa I'_aaem in cesioaet on with eke Isla of alaabov, or the prewisiom of eatertaima nc revoked VUlaia the proodiss five yaara; or Al sO3a_wtrioi or "(tP" Y64t gremtimg tbar,plicarioe would creyta a Public "chat ths,aermml o*atias of Lha pandas•woa24 Lot arf ,auto ebe lwrae a"gmiaa of aqy eersraadilg zsoidmreisi meig6korWrA as "f6) The applicant ban mWn say false, violeadiag, ;+s frasdcicst etataetmse of Matas,$al fast$e the smoaired agg$$e:etiem. Y `- %". 29D pal ^S,� oo.: Can {na" ,�mwnJ�o�e�,ir . pf Q6z eho puSEia.habr€a6,�ar to e � raiop is hawi o,q A { "aa ru t. aioav prtxeodd#tioas pe'tey;;A'a no or easase of a Ia pegRie'oR it doeaa aptxoprsote r tOQ q�,n.rt�7_ae a rai t;eeirtn e¢ "�r�ir �_' ditartaa$}C•And r' haar}aa. Chef plsaeie Coeai alonY sby aao as cr Sayoiee aar,pa I hK eft� knead parrsaae rt itbia cbaator iri said Ce erdN#on f}nda end 6atFtFOs� chat nay PezrkZaa,:.hie a� at oe+erP#ofses eir asf pema'oa eopasetad ciisao#aeer�dith i6e teN§as sareaea, diraoRor. affieor.;jtaaaral ana+ytar,' r at6ar,Retson who#4 axatt}ria= .-rs ;gr3aei ncetotii'o or`os 3nbilf ofx the ypaesl ctQs off'. a4f sst�er$aiNs -lai3aS radar tsa.etkeri ; of�onah' rresdt "{l�*1 adn esp false `�¢felrydiag or frpudul%ne at■fie"t of s ' aatr.ialsfact is tbs aPPlicaeion Sur pa eitt'or say raAort or zacord r'Squi x to be pazaaas:to tiP6la chePesr; ,or of'this ebaptog. or� sap *to _ ordis+saaa, or eondit}os ra Zft to bin j a 'tted wtii tf# or �( 1 4 htrPi 'vk*.cr - .ti "G?{3 •v;olateA `top rnlas, Z%Ulatiaas'at conditions g by l+ f� t.i ift;aa Coakasioa or city"tsaaeil aelatisg to tdo'Moittas'e buoiaato os "Mgt; of Co%{aatM a Orsittat basis a iu user eostresy to On paaas,`?%tEEh. reF&cy am-;easral dolPara of 00' *,lit; or r+uCai if gst;a'ad chat-: ha'sse $a'pout to ha tresead With tba II by a to6 a pstsr�rt "T1tr 41saklon of tbom, esf4 c4vkssii� shall be get forth in" Bsealutioo'•vhieb Anil ba odaesod a eAl tlisty f30) deye of the data a# ruck dasiaic%sad:Ss9.l,ba fisel tal+ae. '% sPDealsd iav sq"Mew,tier the Provisions i of Section t!'61k.0=34 of 4be 01�s OOrCaaan q�s I �ipab'Coda. r,, `Ra tt_tta v a., vCruis shell be r e,, 7qi fra fsc as sstastairoSst Seventy-five drllasq psy&ls AMM%atly vs a `bofosa 3osaary lot of arch and 5# every yeas. "Such EParai t pteblI be ia'add4tiO4:to as business Eieaucs fas tosay be zgtired by the*siagss liattara Mesa of the city: �rve;;for thP,Year 19U. the f"fat sa doss-eaiaweet- t shall be tte,Aaa of tssey dollars' Payable sPea Uwnissfoa of as 4%?Fl44stibe. ' psu%utiy rgei2ad id filer for bad obtain so as,ifttrisssyp s. e}y reason bf the pro•"-AsisN of than ebeftat abatl has% to"= i E -p airs 1,'1985 vicbio ahich N,fir tbair:aPpliee:saj'fas ea weer d city 0AW'sr. 14t o*-,tb'tbe F�a?S.izn����••-h is..,n.«e ze4e�ie�+ r.� t• All poraons candvesi _ o$ � m;sa'aEic 8arte.er snp aeeartaiaaeat 'ahrra dsnoiag;kf y.;esaa or ssa¢o"ra it V\Odttad. Isbell bays is attasiaaee at the preaisea ic: t a Putpoeg at eupwrisieg the dancing and ebs coemaat of Cal patrags ned customers.-.'duly AM s unifore" suavity gedrd et all tikes Such 460cioa is-aareittad yr allote+. mrra%s. tick Ora itio%a of this section shall apply esly to 'those r tetshlisb.,43en or prradSaa wham u loss*floor or dame Oran in use%ss dE crYa hundred fifty equate that is MsAUbla or, designated far 4" my by see0:One trs or paetoaa. a 11DUE �a "Srd�+L s Cl1Y9is`k,t¢y7�4Ca• All progiaiana of t`5iv titl¢�A fil iaeoassstsnk` v;eb oe eoatrarp to the prorioione Gf this cbapur arfieg ib ,trsr r�epasled ko kDr eeae sac6 pso�i'siOpt are'idcoaaiakest ar€tb or costrgr Le vrdFaicos ag this chaptas vim' '<5,12 ten 4 ;Ica. ®d R ` i a* G1) $k shall bs n�iawful" orl �, raT,:gsrsea. fire. .partaarsbx� saf^pceae}.on?ke wsolsze oar ps*r�3 se oa�or Ca of ko eOppLpv+ eh aep'def 41fil, a3res�ak$ba< tHis cDspta> An9, \sea,firs.g i pireav'r,IAI# or corgozat osswfolgtia$f°sy prdsiefea o ibfa Cbapk., or failioa. to aap�lp.vie#set of i[a rsyd€�aaaaea aks11'bo=dsaaad Ya34,[� cf sa.#nFreck€oa aa4,uppa coaiiosioa charaof s6aTl be pmiobeDio a0 fol400lt f?ao.mot no it .nb .a ,riAl'i a (0100.00) for a �, firat•'wiatagfonp �. s "(bl A.fina uoz tegaodfss �^v"�raa lfnAAer:,(SSOO.00) lcr-a gecond-w*OlstiAA mf ibo sew_ordiaaags sikbie'oawy"T, { "a) A fin*a,�eaesadim ►Cab `dit �.tl iitleti6ji of spa elan otdi.escs'viL3ss t:�udeach net R-U`ot. firm Acrtaa=ebip, o�x Ca do t f rporat I - abal 1 :aiE3� as�v as}fe sgd o.4easo.'for sac,. gad ov'e"rp t°p or&by portion 3:*iti o a scisy afiio< vfelatiss of.�,of tdd prowfaiosseef this chapter is. sea ki' r' 'can i�a�aa,•'o� par tldd ty such 1 sags t;iia: ps:n reLip, or 4"� Fo^jCa. e.aE1 ba•diFaoad pCiii4abla Abarefors an pro"** in this ebegt "T psswiciaarf�of,wv,Cbspksr 'shall np: be oo*skraad an dsrai ¢ice '<s —n. 'not taseeribed b®r*ia:,..ead shall ode 'oft ace the x ea2tsn sayi3:ty of a*pr gsaWlsca'�la.psaaissoaa►pg lo,_: ieteiinr of any of the :i. p:Crisat oi4 kbRa c,apdar s ri abeat ACti e.,usiesacv z+v nag.ba-hated bp_tibo Ctt�; ebso:yg:: oivik ;?rec@as ,6 *xi"of iessivaisiaQ order; gr9Rizioa r oer..aaaa[.ia3uaof so a :3a say�kbe ;•��nar;groafeod,bf Ieaa'.or the a6 g t r" ;� nor St.w ci p ass€'1 declares tbati� bculd M4 prowisioo. simtkom" R---S.`',4C)t. .$unrn�, --r Cord Of. Cbie chapter he rao:eaad or deolared. r inigl€$b° oapet©at 3,ntisdfetioa, or Dp M, , 4 .L co^ee aceei i r is a cecrc of c teases a-'?ps+ #,ive lob as �s the vessiaimc preAsioas. $actions, J,�: tea [a iD Swll.force and efUct. iftmat, a4 wit. Ch-Al Ass OAS Ordieaass aatl she City Clerk ti Seas kin"B*p*osa9. vit$is fifeare 4571 daps attar its pages$* a[l*sae o cis .�, p naespagSZ of/1*asral Circulation publizood Caeaaoasa. €:kh+C_fE �'Oakario� Califaesia. sad cirsnlated ,in the City of Rancho 'Celifornis,' gAZSIM. A-M0V,R0.and AMP= this 21st def of Mo. 19%. AT=t enqnat. Kiss, Dahl.Vvigbt YO0: None, r ASSUT: bih*la or I 4 Paz. i„ A;s' l \ JI Y, P9ffiY A+ � 1� r'"r-, CT'°i CL'6A£�„oa ea®C4; a� taatba tissmegcn� ea�Siay e�a� tsfc[er�ggiag ar�iaawae aao�*Wtrr°d�iA at a regalar:'ao� aS�eE�eaaaiQ o' tm Ci+e9 bo Gaeaaa4�gq+6a1 ¢a tibettk•' ti vmh "v}�pmas - mt s •aaler�uaaei_s+o¢ the City SasaA61 a Go�114". i7 1 ass 'aa: Zzad gy.'F`ila�,39ffi`ac Umr0u c omma'. cml ie�aia. ma.1A, 71 \1 x, i k 1 F iY I 14 li! 7, �f RED LUTION NO. A RESDLUT'lOH'V THE RANCHO, CUC MMe-A PLAHRI$iY40MISSION x 4 APPROVIIiCdEN1EFiTA`If l plT PERS�IT 6d0 85a01 TO`OPERATE A►dD CONDUCT EtDTERTAit EtiT BY SMALL, aD�tHDS AND I)WTVID*,'AL PRFtF4i2ME 5x Pf.AYS & °`'M�ISIC/Q /'IlHs'�'RU 4ENts �FOK'" LISTENING ,f PLFA5�IRE RMD DAti NC FOP 7'HE r`fA51C iP Its LOCATED' AT' OiFa FOOTHILL".ROilLEYARFI_ A. RECITALS a (i) On May 21, H196 the f;ity Council of the` CIty of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No. 2,99 providing { for the regui'ation of 1:nteh"ainw t. a (ii) On Septeder 8, 1996, Pat- P. Vornola has filed an appl icatioa; for the issuance of an Entertainment Poizit (tEP 66-01) described abovw in the titre of this r`esoiutiorr. (III) On the 14th day of January,, 1987, the Rancho <I f. Cucamonga Planning Comission held a public hearing to ther above described project. R. RESOLUTION '< NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Cr.aifssion resolved as follows: 1. This Cowission hereby specifically finds that all the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. Z. Rased upon substantial evidence presented to this Comission during the above-refereAced January`14, 1987'hearing, including the written Staff report, and the written, signed and verified application of the applicant, th"s Comission"hereby specifically finds is follows: .a. The application. applies to prop rty located on the south side'`of Footill Boulevard on a lot presently improved with structures and parking areas which constitute the Magic Lamp Inns b. The property to the west of the subject site is developed with a liquor store, the property to the south of that site is vacant and undeveloped, and the property Affik to the earE of that site is developed with WnWs Spaghetti Restaurant; Tr PLAN�I�t���.�t 1�53I�iD�;,RCSOLONUM NO. tt EFL BSa01 'anuary, 14, 1987 Page 2 -F c The applied for entertainment use has ; been op Mating at this loca6orz for an . „ u d,Number of years prior to the edoptio ofr rc inanreA . 29 x d. The ropc+sed entertafinent, as condi`i�Q�a he��bY, �ok�p�l-`es IW WI fifty of Rancho. Cuc nga code req trements; 3. Based upon spbtj: ttftl evidence prdsentnd to this CO�aission du'rrirg he above FM;erence Januar;Yy 1 ; 1gal hearj`ng and,.fupon tk r specific,ffi r iri s of facie a set'l for•. 2 above;. hiss Co islton hereby f,.inc)s nd'concl;�ides_aSI ows., (a) 'Tha's the cohduci of the establishap.69 or, the, gtgagtinr��'°'of ttie�. appl*catian° a+oula not,be corrtrar�v 1 andl ic. heilt safe, 'morals er aelfare:, - ?1 , (b) That the prekises or esiablislLment are not 11kely to be operated In an ; illegal, improper or disorderly midner; and (c) That the applicant has not had any ' a�lproaal, `ti permit or cense'� issued in cof*n'lion with the sate' of alcohol or )' than provision of entertainment revoked r# within the pre.eding°five years; and (d) That granting the application would not create a public nuisance, ,1` -and ��, 4 (e) That tine noriAl operation of the (' premises would not interfere with the ;_Ir peace and quiet, of any sur.sounding residential neighb6rhood; and M The applicant has Griot made any false, misleading or fraudulent statement of material fact in' the required application. Iry », rl,ANNYeNo.0 Nlo. � z EP 86-01 . January 14, 1987 , <Page 1 4. Based upon the findingss and conclusions set forth in r Paragraphs 1, 2 and.1'above, this Commission hereby apprt fes the application subject to the following ions. a. is approval is for small bands and an occas on inilvidual performers praying musica'1 instruftnts for the listening plea=yre and or dantfitg. Expansion' of the dance floor area or increase in the scale or Intensity of eltertainWrit shall require application 'For modification of this Permit. ` b. All' persons conducting a public dance or 8 any entertainment where dancing' by patrons or customers is permitted, shall have In attendance at' the premiss for the purpose of supervising the dancing �t E and the conduct of' all. patrons and customers a duly 1 i eased and uniformed security guard at all t0ses such dancing )7 i ' is permitted or allowd. Howeier, the provisions of this condition shall apply t, only where a dance floor or dance area in excess of one hundred fifty square feet Ak is availab'.e or, designated fd dancing by custaoys 6r patrons.. k APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TR DAY OF JANUARY,-1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY ©r RANCHO CUCAMONGrt BY: E.DavidF ar er, Chairman ATTEST: grad- u er, Deputy Secretary I, Brad Huller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning CorWission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the.3foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamnnga, at a 'regular meeting of the Planning Coniission held on the 14th day of January, 1987, by the following vote-to-grit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: C"ISSICNERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS Aft �l '--- CITY OF ItANCI-10 MUM MA rA3cnnfo'k ' �l : STAFF REPORT U DATE: Janu"ry 1' 1987 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the P'i&r;ning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City,Planner ` BY: Scctt Murphy, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION EQq TENTATIVE TRACT 12877 - C. P. LANGE = A custom o _Gs en tl a I Mbdivi.SiOn o o s on 4.24 acres of land t—o.the Low Density Residential District (2-4 dwelling' units per acre), located on the south side of 19th. Street, wast of Hellman Avenue =,:dPN: 202-241-03 and 52. �i I. BACKGROUND: C. Pe Lange, Enjineers, a rea 'tive of the proper ,akmer, is requesting alivne wear extension of time for the ' above-described tract. Tentat've Tract 12577 was originally approved on January 25 1984 for a two year period with a p subsequent extension to January 25, 1987. I1. ANALYSIS: Staff has reviewod the Tentative Tract Ma and finds r ha a proposal is in compliance with the Low Map Development Standards and witii the General Plan. Architectural plans have been submitted for Design Review. The plans have beer reviewed by the Design Review Committee, s-.t revisions to the plans were required. There is,,however, one area of the 'tentative Tract that is not in compliance with the direction of the Planning Commission - T undergrounding of ekisting overhead utilities. During the previcals year, the Planning Commission has actively pursued a more aesthetic and desirable working and living environ„rent through the undergrounding of existing utility lines. At the time of original approvai for the Tentative Tract, a condition of approval required all utilities within the project be und.�rgrounded including utilities along major arterials 12 KY and less. This condition does not address the existing utility litres located on the Tlorth side_ of 19th Street. ,,t is the current policy of the Planning Commission to require an lrr-lieu feo for the future undergrounding of the utility lines. iie Planning Commissio! however, can not conditionally approve a ''time extension for a tentative tract. Therefore, the Planning n, either deny the extension based on rncons s encies w r currer;'t ollcy or a rove he ex en£fon With on y ose con r on a were reeu re sv n arms na 'a rava ITEM L MTZ. ` i'Z a k Page 2 ( Ir, CORRE P�DNDENCE� Is is ii,egt has been advertised i the,0' '1 newspaper; a:x a putll c Fpari',g,,, Aso pces were tent to >al7 pr�_per I b Owners withlrt 3Q0 feet, `and. pubs lc3 fi?ar`,rg no1 icety were posted-on f� the size,�,' IVi, REG6I6HDATIRN. �eaff re�".oaenends,;tha�t 'e Plannwwg Gonission deny •�' - '; a �k!r+e ex :ens. on'�for'Te�,t�i<twre rac�~I:�577. i 7 Respectfully'submitted; City Planner j BB:SM:vc Attachments: Letter frrom, Applicant €xhf,, t• .A Y citwity.'Map Exoift.."@��- Tract. p �. Originai Resoi.ut1pm of Ap', V.l Resolution,of Qenfal for T� Eatte„lion Resolution of Appr Val for,��*Ex#knsior, AMIk f ' , E � r S; : e y ,jf i z l 1 I b k y� v, ' f J e% ,/ �L �� •',� a r, w r � t E r CRAM;: Off' T r , G10 CLc ��cvc—A TIC.- r. PL'LNNJDI (.J L Z}€V•[5aN ,� EXI HIMt': J- -"1 77, 441 Q4-gesGLUTpp OF. ME PL4NM L USSION THE CITY OF h Crit, itl�C ONGa, CA�L:FURNxA CONW,IONAW-f APPROVING . E A Ii TE ,1 W ERLA"a',� entati 1 ,act. MN No IZ,577, heeeinafter,"Ma00-submitted by Pilgri s EntftrJses, dr�corpar�st d, apolimot� fan the pyrpgse-,of subdi Yding t':a' " 1� sapert i;t.natcdn1 . � L�ttd ar" an��t� Crc ga "County of San Erhari Sfit� af Galiiar a.. desoribe as :a :;rs ;r [o hrdi�`son F an 4r24 acres of, d,'`in q rt^ "!"" Qi,¢tr'I located"on eta iuuth itdd, at nth Streets west a# t,�`fit► esti - : " '[ O�lr � and 8 pinta S Lots;,'regularly ,." cant before the `e_ �n�j_06ioo rstan falr kvrr ri:t. area►irsg anG arytion an 23t -day of January. 2S8a;" an : ' Y WHEREAS _#C�e icy Plattner iz rgc�ta rwded apprdval of the,Map sob eGt to all conditions` sot 'forth in the''Zlgl�eering and Planni�g Divisi'on's reports; as 1 a' KNGRa& the, Planning Caatissian ,ass lead ail i tnsidered t the Engineerin.4 a r;PlanrYfng Mvl+ oon`s reports and idde'"'kother evidonce. presented aC pt blic hoarihq. Z NOW, T NER EM, the Purring Comitsiarr 0r tZ�B\\Gi'� 4f Ra' cho Cucamonga dohs resolve is follows. r !EC',IQN i. T6e i'j_"ni'nq Gom ssicn makes tke fullomipgq• findings in rew--u-6 e itat ve Tract Ho.' , —077 and the M`m, theTeoi(' ,fa) The tentative trade is €�ns�stent wrt� z-he's-�^:eral , Plan ami� SP acifia plans; (b) �`;e deMgn or ia9prnre'wotS of the tentat1yQ t;aei is consistkint with the Denercal Plan and specif, 64M.- (c) The Site is 0Ys ^-iMy suitable for the type of development,.prapost � (d) The design of the subdiviiim is riot likely:Ztq;.cause substantial environmental damage asic ,avo'idable injury to humans and wildlife ar their habitat;- (e) The tentative tract is net likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract wil``_t=��onflict with any easement acquired by the public\A large, r now tik record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed sr;bo visioh.r i, 4i ; �. Pae2 (g:) Thai thus { +OJT wilt not create adverse impacts on the, roe v r nme and, e, Negativei Declaratian is,�; issued, a , SECTION le Te tat,_-,fact Map No< 12577, ,a copy of,,wAich is attached erTt eta,hs here5 appa ed subjea* to all a thex gol la+� n e ��fittn i and ..he atteGhed'�tapdeCpnd" t;pns: Plawni,q. 1. Yar- ate drat yard setback, par,-the`"`l. Distici" stands, s ath kve oprien�t ibe, {steal"l be regarded , >. n fhP ne'+h Tract Hag. �. A mi:nimumdpt.'� of 1Q0 feetK, ,all be provided-an. Lot ` $ in'accafdasl r110t Deueio ient� G63e-regtuiremenGs. � 7 Engineering of0i pion 1 1 3. Th Final -Tract Map shall be �revised to provide a. v oot'ri9}et-of-way_for tie interior street. 4. Chet developed stall be rp=pansible fob the . installation of a'.catch -basin:on 19th Strait, and outloi storm drain deui4e� : to,' the �?fioFflsq� EW, Eeryl/Hellftrf, stoihd dram Tie requi e'd r:isemenU _ will b : th�j responsibj1i �o +he ; pelo'""per ter obtain from the aoininq`property oWi#er. �. S. The developer will be rtspons bje to bond f0'r the installation of -adequate flood protection devices ' \ from tht Beryl/Hellm'an stgriu drai'A channel, if the y City. chWei prodect,,h43 snot been awarded for construct tn by the City Council prior to recardstion. t APPROVED.AND ADOPTED THIS 7atlt nAY OF JANUARY, 1984. PLAN ISSIQN QF THE\CITY OF UNCHO CUCANOWG,; BY Dennis L .St ut,.Ch3trman 6. ATTEST: f paty ecre ary rJ JL 10 ReGman" �1.� ` "ftitk Go 'o*a y aecretary �r�` the PI'anrtin0the Cit." of }. Rancho Cucasnor� a,-, , ��r1?Y criy that xhe;, or'egg keG °-� .Wks, � :an�; rie ulart ntroded; Ras and ado'red b� kle planrir �ts �on ; °`the 9 3' * P r �. City 0_sac+cho C par cgs;.a' a'r egular in"tfn� of'":-,ie Plann��f i��ior,.held ; on thej,.Sth �` ; o Ja uary,, �9$4:, by khe �o1lowinR vote to-wit., AYES COMISSIONERS �iCNEEL, BARKER, JUAREZ,`REkipEL,'=»"'tittf js�M1' NOES: CO<' Y$S�IOFlERS; �lQ�V� `•i j. ;.: L. ash;hT• CQ;+ 4ISSIONLfi : Hoy i , a { f r7, 1 r1 ` ;a t5 n. IF a..�bj `Ot "S55 Owe a.� I7 dd �m N.« yyL aH.e .s.., G�ry r G.0 4 �L Q ��uG a9 �` �w d� ^d "cIt ' w!µ o.�..•' 'reO1 2ou .�� _y Y'a a y L �i 'tip qa a3.a� d ad op;_, F5' t..d �G .G NONyao 11 4' V �CC•r RS r VC �' OOp C d i=.R'.aV.r Y a.0 bcG , 4 6 �Li 'A OL D✓ LVL ANG L�H L wc�o - bon d.au d.a. o —$. r �.�9yGR+ .'NO q,w nu y .. i �G a.O: GO6 .COO CNCT L� daw u�l.iq •+Q �`�! N' �GM1: C LNNL 99 �0 yw. CRY o'�d' ;p^11 daml 'tl-...., 3s'wa Oat ��t'.L (d,u..N.S Paw Lv Y+� �^p nRQ opo► �.� � cY dr�rd �•a Apo �lC!a N �C �0 n.�l4t Caro C�C{^D M. . ppp y yyO�Yy a0 N^�..y. ' Cwe'.y 3 0 L OI dy✓ N Uy rVyy V o 1n A y' IN ` r� 6OJ i1N O 6 �y4 $Q�• 9�,�b N -.:QG -CHI LC �C4 Y` C �~bv s �� ~ ■dp byNs�" vo oa. § .¢cam � �ca Sd:_ .a. S $y> '�'w5',a;o �.V■O JVyggo y'�C3� �.JI..Ca ...*.0 w„ N Y C.ra N -Crw. YI g at p,, g V.6.1:V Ti T '9:N�O.V ROi C9iy-C. i�0L1 i'N6A .E��w.GO .6C V 6 t9 rfi.N. rNO. NL NO a^ ac aer_N ri, aq9 o b �+ Wtu .oay a'o > ` VOq Q�V V N` i OC C �Y qV. �bO N N yy CL O. Y pGp SVIC LVVj J! ay M L.'LaY tt qw�i `o `-�- NL aLi'e JO IOL Y O CC sX nn Y ��G •di'Gi0 N�y Y�L yN V y...dd 0 a � b c d' ^ rv� mad gyro � S ro c... G— zw p V eb. —■$ �.rbi NC w as q? .. �� � y �GN �a~ 1�=0 Vc� • 4GO1 VV 0CG v9:N 0 w V t ...0 L_-8 C ` ZE;' r,glc -E: aS�Y oN E,.., a=d.� 11t s ,1 Yeti R�v'ci.. E Ae+ui a, ^R t.Y YNn 'yo o'c, YLL4Y SAC=0 aw w " oJt�Buu c a + sR oa.u a..YA :a Rwm Uw an a a n • LoL y�c RY .� A`.0 9 coc �Q+ 'ca -Y d 'u� t�4"•~ �.BMrA� 6C 9p yy,�, C .+• .•4 E pCu�a�La`� aOCaL.C?C i AMC aYC � CR +; tAq M1I+J YL. 9 AQ Yti 'd+ •.¢.H/p QYY.; UG {`LC CAaQ YY4d Chia.. CC��rjQ�+L pw Ct ��y L•^!•O � ` 6 rr ltu C�q AY��"G 6trr0( Y�.Li 11 Gf,N�y'°•'C pC ' aY•CL X ! q U R LL '� w �cYj � c'G Yiyt o�$�u 2do a.c,c�v;r�ueau Td a�u ,N� ®7C[1��w�d CN Y,p�¢A'•.'^.w AB �`'.0 ' (} A Ts i Ji R..7%P'•'�p i 0 Oda 3 d Y G e.-A^'l i." C�.c R C Gy "� `CYp.¢ FRC _1!6��N^ �' m� ^•� ^i rt�i QO �L My Q9�'Y C� � + L�C 7 L':N :I •�pla N-AI-Ep. as-., zz Q dyad C Y' a+p N�rv6a ^.avert C9y� n��"�' 3"iJ g S aowi �"{]' a'R n a��S�i� Ra aLi.'"'uF"':_a►, �a�':"'u9CCo m ' .�9 `.� a0•'� !ate NA tlC r+U NRC'CW La 03w OL YID Y' OC O� Ri GG i• gg 1a`acst. A Gz. ""F' 6' lix R � VI 4G � 0 O • a7 ♦. 6 .i 'Z 21 o v N ~6+Ye• �'c'� ��. �CC �►`. S'�!«+ gimps •+5., Fyn .....p� p ir'�L.. w L O �. yY O C O y O 5 b•r T C^ ^ ".6• v« Y F y S LYM 4 9'y N aA.w.^d M aN 'Y. O z }„=A -a +, ♦ +{. .�.�pw�LN �e+�q� ..awn' 1.2 Y. Yq w^ fod Cy LN. N ♦VCC..C~SV CLt4 1 aG <" wa� nQQ Pyy di• aAORL • �C4YYa � .;, � .. N � Cogy rGC �ry21 O{Tw CY„ G�� Ya •r N OWS • L aN p'`,1� ��YL. �� �Vi�wt.A Na M� ss�tl��� aw�.w �p wy�• 'pY�. ��� ..C >. C" �=._R.V�.. CCitw.N PCy. L� _i-•g. �yYcy �.9W �• c u 'c s^�R'v ow a512=�. •rds4 o.._. au•'� 9a 'F" q, do� � pp` ♦n�::c vi w tl yy9++L YCS Yy. ayC LA�ti gGa =� MC a'adO�u NY ra M Ya. G Ca= Y+a Y a c �qa o.p ,c. .man c Pay�a. oan i a '..�a y.. ��� �v9 d a u r �"•ti= u'v ROOo. RYA t' p��� T� L nM oTiLl 1a A N 7 q <.Y 1 6a'u uu u•n l rw.•�• C`I V l d¢ N"y. • <�N iaiwQ is vw a� ��Ya Nc9: � �rx.LV.. 2c1t N..s.. Yi .0 wa. WwC..r�„C.R i.f• ^ E L. r _ ruc.mc ,ca nti +`aaa Na ���,� Nbao ropN�p '^' NG,? <In d. �C.• '..off tRq�+ p•; y N 'rOAy t NG <VydY Gov U9 4LCy E �...CC'. t sd4Ci Al y GU�.' t" vN �p'�^ Ny W a L L c.•a=rN $a`)a zc a.' 9�a sroe �'u� oc cga a YA « day 4 A Lgq6�4� 4 LYu �L�N v 3oi. d$ y�y�vv..r ao�3Q� n� �'y�•, be«.�. ❑+f•• :�°1�= aZoys� ����a r� d = Mt. L1 b .iy XXaa_ a,'O�V q Y9 _ MC> OwA �A IN BC ' .�:4UP,.ma � !r'.•iv CC V M AO.� EOU uCC. NN 9 L N»gM A w yA.+V O ..U•' .w.O�A �M` O.N »L —'y�"3S NS ^.`+« e,�nrq e.o.,A. ;�.-� �,. R a a,`"�,A L"• _� nAtao� a `va `�cAsEi t ,c* 7aQy et.`AtAp p ;ro Ni O.G ry —Q`: NQ NCF. 4vQ �Vr. 9df—N�' ^� A '•—T$� y wL O'ES rR— 9.2,-S ... Ir Ac .� <It. vA 4 pCCq q} nf4 •^CVY �..�` Q OO. 42 y^ a .1C'�GN NO �.: �i. roc O�j ^� A. +•vyc •�Ng .U..µ.Src.%w46�y� C— N «» W .A R O ✓. 4 a�» gggg..O �.Y 6 L �ugPil u� A .. L O V N Gt p v r0.C` 4 •i y0 V. c A a o. .. r u.— .0 g§ yy N�y /J T L ... {•�9�4 aCN yC N J�V` 9�G SS^y0 ACC ... CC1 O. y<NOC CL A aYtn rou 4".�,C M3atl cG Y 6' pir� t•`�11 gu�/m 'NY V` ba au�`eyn c=4 o r..sy «yr r _ � �„ p a,�6 "LNUT ppc �y.• Arm' A.NT yaA' as vN u d.O p = 4 q y _ " rH9 nt.N9yod 2.2- Iv C e Ci pQ N¢¢ c C y L . gO+y+,,// � n 6'�l ^AO 4U O�dlb VN6L.p 6�� N G��.���• - n^ —` ,�x 4 .Q w �u yy CI d�A L O G =O�pppp.♦ Y—i� 0 �; Iid A.Y x�40 C•T'nCOW%l'QA ,rwj � � �� �;'y MO NN+�n t.- i.cw .boa `• --•.t.uuu w60.3N wA... tNr� gp �N yfnG4 . W = , 'frf sei nq omum ee a- \c �Fc a q Hex ��.. 72 �i.' �'�<4 ..E�n� • tr0 a.T � o y4u � Cry �Ew yN� O�c�G 50 m. C Q C �w0 4r 40 C ENLL y A W Y 4 y �' n q C Y=9 m Y�N ♦ + �L >0:. .bC y BE m rO C T T C b y �T�E e`c o°ar Z.ca ®.^ $c] .uR you c«.a.�' Qp� r��nn+✓.t.v _ nmat }Cy1dJ ��%•`up 6. 6 wY �C.' 9:3 y2tFW`6 �YOIY.1e4 L� irC LM +u YY y G.p-Q0 Y 69 Y h b G 9 A d• G ` Y q ev L g. aa.��. y Q �.y • L'6�.1Y-N: I��9v'Q`.'. N G`V� 'tUN WV'fi FG ss-NU! �,OtY L�WO l lv V f - 4 y 4d .Y «A T C � n d c Y o ass 4. I It o °. "o v—'qco d o vpr►p "I p yNy,p 9` w L a laop '9a o d :YA 4 L w ..- Y' c yd.b..zia is O a 4 O Z $. w-u- o c ,moo va 4e� �. "• auc N d yV «69 o. oc �q �p u,u .`` uW.. Uie; e:Yac...ti+ni u—ate a$ 4 Y A WC'- G>.4$ Lli. LGi� b9 d.0! L � l�A Y•+Y ► I�10. i is N 1 �y � �w GC,7 d .^P L L.<'-� V V•O.it� V",,I C � I 1 '`l „V, m N LY c64 ,� � C a t 1 a.•r. Y L aye ���I @C A w s0 tb _V L yPl OyY c5 1 u. bt$.Hi 1 F:Gd' �. c V' Ybrw.r CY r' •uw � ,�g2{G, v.Q�O. �O � � ��. � � . C Z. q V. GL q 9' 'j C O. b O `V UO y•O 8ryryry 9t L � � • 1 L•'Y' as � :o`..Y,v �u« a`:S Ica`: wqs $ iY+:"wad •s�.,ia:= t '� i _ Cab u W T OwOi d.� V.r V b GC 01O-N /] O C4r ;CVI C�rW' C V '� =.m=.. k a�,�N L sA OL•Q... v� a O ,t V � C.O. �u•S wOO.Qw ERG _ "4��,��. 'b w KY v s d~ r� SDw.eCC e P. W N CC NCO eVr use Z V 4 p O.'a .4 Y 9CNY V =ypµ yq0 L! �D. OS C '6b � . 06 CC N b e+by0. -MqV CQO<d. J:OT ... CC.^.f.�.• Hn Y' y'GI,Cot' Ou +0 gdyiyi L Ci a' N.4 4 Nl4 nr po .r Lc � G uO �G.q G� w GM �bCC T G A9+9� .ALA G L d O d Z � O. j ...L !'4.�i.G ' d �.:N��1 A• c_Q P d a t 01OOLS PO4 PC s�CV® <i N t�� l r" y CI 4 G - ^R w Oi QI G y e T n o v a ..,. •.. tN'1[jj v e c u �t s� �Yvr CON c c nG�= .. !/iVbN. <•v ac -IG gr F, LLea.00d C4v uC r., O6 p Se V O [^u9. ✓eCe: pd �rt ^N .� aiv, Y S V NV ` aI`—, . ouu� Y N 4•�. 6YL. co > d L? n. r.pJV q. pL ^�� �O. W _LLY A+•' :itlY `..n �C.. Y y L �� L tlM1l O .or E_ �'u t2f` •r5',.� w _..Y un.g' Y 'Z" R p 3zrdi a c� GN r�•�•j } ro bYyr r..�v n .: d� aVr 10.1 uw � cap OI V pY CICp.: `tyJL Y��r a`�•:Y f•a�`. ^A aS +C O 2 N na Y OU LO % f:. 4 FO.V: r� a� r p1II o r ~ .. nrrZ -.95z A..�• wii� 4 G:a 9P O N 6{SLQ C . . C ouNNc w pp - �...O. 29 Air.el 6-�•t'd C Y9--2 L p> lY Lp Ny1�p Y � +M U L-Y y 9 4F LO tn..vN C�i.NL IT ��� O:O WOgiq w pl Vp yQy�p O"• w. opS �. oy�Q yrli-o ,. t'4-2 lcN N ��n« " t-0 n 'o' moo c. ae CaC bG'o. re�� ba _ {erg ea yd .�L.,� ..arn..tt_>> j. u n�' CW.p..6w OG� Y C1O-�-. X� apC L :'� ws OY N0lruyw Y Clf� Q >NCT rig u A N. I,t y O2Z �L 4� qqN O tfJ 5�1 4LF �,` Ogd'r Y. pYLOrL ran BE ap :,€ t Yy uov lq \d {� (Oy f& t. nL OaG ,1. L C d C v'6r1 o A�. ' n g b I: LI V. Q� r d� �....�Y o-M av'.„-:�c «e_�. "uc g�3< 'c°^nW vc KIa u'a.«"rd Nc "•` III <u �u rnacea .c t.n rn pwo 1111u iu....o_ z i.1 a I" .GY V y R Y_a 4ot.. a y.Y Et CC o NcNE ` r "Cil- �J TC a .T.w GY 1 WOLUTION NO. r . t A RESOL°Ufi'QHFOF TIE RANCZI UCAMMA PLANNING ON�LSSI.a�1, DEHYI TNC 7YP2£:EMI EnSION FOR T�NTATIYE TRACT i2577 n WHEREAS,,-a= ret ga� s been filed�i+nr ti�se ektensiohr for_the above-desdrtbad: projecet, rpursuant €-o.-;Sectioh ];.501:.63i, ! =of'Ordtnasic the Subdiviscn Ordfinancer'=and' ,"il WHEREAS, the PYantfing C_pWWon corditianeliy' -approved � o above-described te»tati4ve tpntativ* trae << WHEREAS, Tje Re cn'o Cucamdnga Planning Coy ff"ian finds'-that 'the (` tentative tract de5'cribea `hergin i"s in conflict Wfth the directi`tins of ;tho eveI opment''fin i' NOW, ?FOR 6E IT RcSOL4ElF tht the Rancho Cuoportga PSaarr�$!g Commission hereby den es�cr z'ta lan fbr Tentative�Tract 12577 , APPROVED AND ADOP7.WrS.14TH DAY Or drt:11illRY,' PU kftkG COMISSION OF THE Cll,wSF,IRANCKO C6CA WA, ==- l E. David ar er, za than y ATTEST: Brad u er, pu -.-re ry, —'—" i" Y, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning ,Commission of the Cityjof -° Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the forregoip6 Resolution was duly iInd r��,,.l.arly introaUced, passed, and adopted byte P�1anning Commission of�Uie City ofanhhp"Cucamahga, at a regular ameting� f the Planning-C�mm issield on, the 14h day pf jar;sAary..19§7 by ter following vol:e-to-wit: AYES: COMISSIOHERS: r1OES: COMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMISSIONERS: " t T.T- - - � ONE RMLUT1014 NO. ` A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANN14a,tommissTm iPPROVING A T114E EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT I2577. d',*_quest -has been filed; for a time extension for thq�.., e. above-oaicrAW project=rarsuant to section 11,02.1009 and, u WHEA'+►S,, the Plannlnq Comission conaittonal'ly approved the 2'bave describzd Tek�ivo Tract. �.e SECT&'T %, Tha-iunneho Cucamonga Planning Cowdssion has made the a foilowing'"TMWh s- A. Thy` revicusly approved Tentative Map, is in subs;ntiai compliance with the City's current; , . Gener�l Plan., Specific Plans, .Ordinances, Plans,." Codes'And Policies; and, S. 3he `eA" sion of the Tentative Mko will nit mouse sign,ificalt inconsf� encies with the current Generll Platy, 5p.1.�itic.:Plans, Ordinances, Plans, Codes aw Policies; aqd, ` C_ The extensiot of the Tentative Map is not likely tzQ cause public health and safety problems; and,, D. fhe extension ,within the time limits prescribed by state law and :oval ordinance. SECTION 2. The fthtfiv C- Ownga Planning Commission hereby gr time exten"sTon'sa act to the foil en or:. Tract Expjrationr 12577 C.; ta�age January 25, 1P38 I ;APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14T.4 DAY OF JANUARRY, 1987. PANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY. E. David arKer Ma rian ATTEST: Brad Bul1er7.__Udputy-SecreTjry A ' II CO�si�..I � TENYAYE ,'Rr � i Janu�`r ;M I. Brad 9u lor, Deputy Secs Ca of the:1TanniA ro�isaiup�;o� the C1ty of Rancho Cuwaorx��i � �ew,;verb thathe foregorr� R soiuton �eas•�ttaT aQt� rI v + regal ,� roduc j a s«d, and° a ton ed,by tfiie ���anr� n ' two tsion 4f City of Rano `�Ckakon�^ a� regular,�eetin of the{P�anni°ng Goc�►►i;s ion Fi l,d on the 14th away v. ta��,arl�s x�[, b "the"flof`I��,h� Yote;-to�wit�: AYES: C014hSSYOtiERS: , NOES: COPI *'I''ONERS: ( A64e5t'Y: COIdMI'aSYOt�ERS: �n;> "' !' i 7-7 z i �-- CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.M�?N'srA STAFF RENj G ` DATE: danwary 14, 1987 1977 T-0: Chairman and Members f,the Planning-Commission 71 f, FROM: Brad'Bul l er, City PPanner r, -By: Greg gage,: Assistant Planner SUBJEGT MODIFICATI0H TO CONDITIONALS USE PEAR T 85-09 MQWNf�IN VIEW,COMMUNITY UMV04 - -ques to modrr y a nC �C►t iti-IMal se ;erm or ,a cm d day-car :enter and pre-shoal,`*:o 'allots a church within the d�istll schaoi ,facilities ^ located at' the northeast corner of Valencia 'i and Haven Avenue APN 201-221-11« !! I. BACKGROUND: At the, Planning Coanissioni meetin, on Julyl24, 1985 ie ommission approved Conditional Use 1permi,t'No. 85-09, !a request to develop a 7,422 square foot child ;lay-care center w,f thin the Terra Vista Planned Community, after aid initial continuance from the J;►r loth meeting. Today, the LA Petite Acadeky leis fully opera n•nal and the churcn has -Oeen 4onducting services on the premises for several months. i 11. PROJFC;( AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action }I_e_gjested: Approval of a chylrch use in,conjunction with an existing day=care/pre-school. B. Existing Land Use La Petite lcadem;f Child Care Center and Pre-school. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: or n 1 e am >! es e—n`l al; Medium Residential within Terra Vista, South vacant, played future Neil)hoornood Commercial center; Neighbornood Commepcial within Terra Yista East - Single Family Residential; Medium within Terri Vista West - Mobile home park; Low Residential and Low Medium Residential (4-8 du/ac) 0,. General Plan Designations: Project psi e - .aw- a z.jm esidenj2ial (4-8 du/area North .- Low Medium Resi ien:tial South Low Medium Residential tazt Low,Medium Residential West - Lcw Residential (2-4 ITEM M' 1 tt PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 85-M - MOUNTAIN VIEW COWUHITY CHURCK January 143 19$7 f Page 2 E� Site Characteristics: Existing child care pre-school facility. F. Prodect Details; The proposal is for the use of are existing pre.sc o"T a'c city for worship servfces and incidental activities. Sunday morning activities currently take place between 9:30 and 11:00 a.m., with a community social conducted from. 6.30 to 8.00 pm. on one Sunday per month. The church is proposing to expand its hours of operation on Sunday mornings to allow acti`ities from 6cO0a.m.;ta 1:00 p.m. and to expand. Sunday siening activities to four nights per montts. The zhurch is also proposing to add a Saturday evening worship service i fro4 6:00 to 9:00 p.m., and two nights during each week for chilorens' and community activities. Outdoor facilities are, presently utilized on a limited basis for childrens' recreation r and social activities. G. Applicable Regulations. Churches are permitted throughout the -� r Terra VistaPlanned Community, subdect to the a0orr4,1 of the ' Conditional Use Permit per the CorAunity Facilit -,;croon of the Terra Vista Community,-Plan. H. Parking Calculations: 1. use type -churc 2. Total floor area of assembly - 660 square feet. 3. Parking ratio - 1 space ;.er 35 square feet of "sombly floor area,' 4. Number of required parking spaces= 39 La Petite Acsdemy 5. Number of parking spaces prok'ided -39 IA minor Exception was granted to reduce the required number of parking spaces from 45 to`39 based upon a detailed traffic study). IIi. MALYSI . A. General: The church has been operating without a Conditional se ermit since 'approximately October. As a result of Code Enforcement, the church is now seeking a Conditional Use Peftit. A church' representative has indicated that the proposed use is temporary only. and that a new churei facility will be constructed when suffictert funds are available. The church has obtained a permit for public`astembly within the pre-school facility from the Foothill Fire Distritiy,,subject to a maximum occupancy of 99 persons within the warship area. A condition has alsn been attached to limit: the worship area to 1,200 square feet, to ensure that availarle on-sita parking is not eMeeded. Although single family residences are located adjaceo#t to the project on two sides, potential noise impacts � are effectively mitigated by a solid block wall 6 feet in neight on the northern and eastern property boundarvis. J I ,i ww,CHMO F , P ` 3` E u aT, 441 I Wh 1 :tf►e "esi�t5ng .1a�iNlit vrill seiwve adequately for e k p posed Use,V t k+ass not ' si eo as a �.,S�r�ca I grAohlddddece�ed a e mad a�capa 'tt ' .w _ �A,.�.. he: egoe s�lnul �«rcosi' "*re •' . '• e t ccor fora roy+ „ on-, o r baV S only, + t IV. FACT YFORI _ , T�i;3s1 P'oj7ec iss co rsStenL j �tlie"" ter raf. it - 1Tist r'�T,�a� W��"Jko rr nCi �ra�J �p�an, T be .,detr e faeant p 9�terties� torf� cause��rats 4� Ne cf vel pa' ioa�" a vouissuedW �ot t ;t� mYrr eix Rtocosi � ecnodnP . - : r n�.e groti„s o s :o tt . 1 en a:-�Y Plan +Eqs n� �` hey DevldM"ii t � e a�C iS ana tli CORRi:SP(pJD ,iCi{, Tt f-' iteal"his'becn° a i erl ins d as 4*, �ikblic hearfir�9,. n e afTY 12��or�t ti spa r,� the p eperry' posted, and, not�i"cis were, sent,- o ra°h properly owners Wthittn 300 felt" .of th1s, pro�eca, ���p. !�. REC hD FOtf °,Staff-ret-dimdrift that t.4 consr r aI, �atex�iaT;amP� regar_diag this prop sa+l. Sf t�se Commission, oncurs., tith the ," n�mags and wtondiations -of Approve, � the adoption of thi Mached Rdso utls n"would be in order. Resfully ttod, Brad B er City Planner & BB:GG;sgr Attachments-. Exhibit "A" - Land Use Exhibit'"B" - Location and Site Utilization Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Exhibit OD" - Floorplan Resolution of Approval k Letter of Authorization F _ u- ,b �1 CITY OF RAMCFfj GUGA bNr - PlaMing D °doiSn. r > Rah $aseling Rd'., Su te.0 ha Cucamonga , CA gf 730 x0vemher 25,- 2986 \ Deari Sirs, }�j';; La Petite Academy #,,oi- l.,k�T to x`ile foz an amend�ient �f ,<< oiir present G.iF:P $�-b9 whfh � allo�+r for the use our facility by church. We here agreed to let bfountabnv�,e;�t Community _C'hurch-file the,nece4sary papev.6 with-'the city s ` ton our behait.,.-,4)assume respons U la L .'fo'r hity fees. 1,knp� qw } Divisional Representative - La,.Petite Academy (<r (IN242 U49 52, 3 59&u 11 JUDYC1 RkOLL ilk ri 12011 A R�gitYrai Wrac�at i �.. �. i§"fir}! Op ri'�• Q' _ /.� 3 y . 4. JOB as FOOTHLL s s � � � � �r"iLS L {�4 Yt ':3SSAi�•�F... T.JT" � �_ • pp 4 't• • ®�� 6 ®L!' C .i...i'31. Q .ct�." i Y a _ ♦ b ii• YYY.i e b ! t •; y J :fit �^ ��, is 6 RESIDENTIAL VERY LOW-C20U'S AC C- LOW 2-4 DU's/AC cc LOW-MEDIUM 4-80YS AC M D'It9t°s' 4-14 DOS AC -=.;ice MEDIUM-HIGH 14-24 DWS AC KIrPI 24-30DUWAC 0 MASTER PLAN REQUIRED N IORTil CITY OF ITEMS RANCHO CUCAN OiNTGA TrME PLANNING DIVISION EX2IIBITS2 - ALES �' x:vrsxn. ►g x, s IJL Full {�/► PROJECT � �� ¢ � �T clrr EAs1= ' u�FG{ii�.�tlo® CtBtDt�tt,- ff� � �r`,. ��� •v IOUH CITY OF ITEM- B15-on RANCHO CUCAMG-,X,3d TIII.E=. i1-�z� a enneaFFoam ; gar lilt Eei6 Ptak, sea G eaaa aix,.eeF:2l Fit sdav Eel! r . •.{e' I. ���� lJlIA9 FR�t�FAFi ! � iFFFe Ht 9te4816, likes an am i"O r-!a TaP/ BF�T 3e11...r ' a.e:IU.dilalen• Pe•tee/a.l T. - {iFf reieetlFr. ,a as.it N6 1{4j'4, J P { j I P l s •E gO�WEQi SOWER f 1QFi FEATURE e Y'ALIF ➢A Ay 0 ZEN QM [Pod% �p pa coxamy its s f s i Parking Calculations: gYVcNaCUCAMONGA T` se ype - c urc 2. Total floor area of assembly 660 square feet. 3. Parking ratio 1 space per 35 square feet of assembly craeorAzwro s Owftig' floor area. 4> Numoer of required parking spaces - 19 church "°" 39 La Petite Academy 5. Ruinuer of parking spaces provided -39 (A Minor Exception was 9rentea to reduce the required number of parking spaces from 45 to 39 eased upon a detailed traffic study). NURTH cyry O RANCHO y 7�r,�r (`+T ��''^�tt,�� ram,`.-� -------�- •. DVENGA PLANNING DiVISDN IEXHtA1T= r� M'" ' I \+1 { ` I� AOL alga S 1 �'c'5CP�, 71-•F — — �� .a J ►�10f5Tt't CITY QF-RANCIJO T t GA _SCALE:- .vMA., RESOLUTION NO.j _ r � A RESOLUTION OF,TH,E RANCHO CUCA14ONGA`PLANNING.°GOi�fISSION APPROVING A` MADIE+I;0ION TO CONDITIONAL USE''PEkm.IT NO. 8549 FOR A Chi* WITNI►l AN,FXISTIhd DAY-CARE FACILITY LOC T�£D `,QNs THE ^P14RTHEf►1ft CORNER OF VALENCIA AN``:N THE t Me_- R£SIDENI'IA. 'OTSTRICT WITHIN THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED Cu�lNITY. WHEREAS, on the 3rd 04. of December, 1986, a complete application was w filed_by' the Mountain View, �Go�{�arMly Church; fs�r review of the above=described project; and WHEREAS, on the 14t 1� -y of January,.1087, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held,.,,a ,Wi 1c hearing to'consider. the above-described project. NOW, THEREFOR£, 11te Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: Vb SECTION 1 That the follo»ing findings can be met: • 1. That the proposed use is`in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of"the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed use, together With the conditions., applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the' 4 public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That, the proposed use complies with each .of, the applicable provisions of the Development Code. SECTION 2: That this project trill not create adverse impacts on the envir�Ament an at a Negative Declaration was issued on July 24 1985. SECTION 3: That the Modification to Conditional Use Permit No. 85- 09 is approved subject to the following additional conditions: 1. Approval is limited for a period of twenty-four (94) months and shall expire on January 14, 1989, at s which time the facility shall revert to its primary use. If necessary, a written time extension request may be filed by the,:applicant 60 days prior to the. expiration date. 2. Occupancy of the building shall be limited to 99 Aft persons within the worship area and 97 children within schoolrooms. M k 9} 3 S. Hours of operation shah be 'Iimited from%-100'_a.m: to 1 :00 m` on oieeEnds and 600 a m°. to 10:W 4 p.oa, on` knighs: tteekn'9htetir�gs" shall nat occur:more,then tw,ce WpekI, �`u�th�r; in, no :case shill" charc A asjtivi ies Vvq'.lap 'with tho primary hours of the- La Petite Academy r�. ^ 1n .. manner which epng crea k ry _4. Public asser sly yr, lard-v group meetings' (50+ persons), shazlil snot_colliipit� upt;fi such ,"Ilse s.411" univfo,Inn 8uil .'A'"Ll",s ea,�`an 9&te Ff re' wkhall's Regutationsihave tieen °cp3�ied ;,i��th." Fro ,'to �. occupy-.v plans `shm�leu �it to the Foothill Fire' PraF�ctdon Di°strict ar'd:the8uit.dtng,and`Safe", Di is shoatcopi°lance . APPROVED AND ADOPTED .THIS 14TH'DAY OF JANUARY, 1987. ¢. PLAININO COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC. HGA 4, BY: E. David ar ,^er, Chairmam. ATTEST: r Brad Buller, Deputy- Sicretary 1, Brad Butler, Deputy Secretary of the Planning ppradission of the.,City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregof g P4solution was`duly and eegularly introduced, passed, and adopted`dy the Planning Coastission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regu9ar meeting of the Planning.Commission held on the 14th day of January,: 1987, by the following vote-to-wit: , r AYES: COMMISSIONER$: j NOES: COWISSIONE s: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS" ° M- ro CITY OF RANCHO:dUCAMONGA G4 o STAFF REPORT. a u . DATE: January 14, 1987 1977 > 11 '1 TO: Chairman and Member,, of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner " BY: Greg Gage, Assistant Planner SUP,JECT: TIME EXTE?i5Iuid 'FOR 6ONAITIOW91' USE PERMIT '84-21 - ALTA A convers op tit a I.E168 -square- 0o s rrg.e am y re5idetni:e to an pffice for the Al.;ta ,° Loma &r:ristian Church on a .26 ate'-dreel of land in the iJ Very Low Residential District (0:2 dwelling units per acre), located on the nest side of Sapphire, across from 4 orange. APN: 1052 - 332 - 23. tl I. ABSTRACT:: The Alta Lorca Christian Church is requesting a two-year ex ension of time for Conditional Use Permit No. 84-21, due to a period of slow growth. The approved Conditional Use Permit [ allowing the temporary conversion of the single family residence to ' an office for the church," was due to expire on November 28, 1986. Although time extensions are normally approved as consent calendar items, this request was advertised as a public hearing due to a newly added' ccnultion for utility undergrounding. The Engineering Division subsequently determined that it wound be inappropriate to attach a utility undergrounding condition to this request. The r,E public hearing must be conducted as advertised. 11. BACKGROUND: The Commission approved the Conditional Use Permit on ovem er 8, 1984 and directed staff to review an existing Conditional Use Permit for the adjacent church pre-school (CUP 83 041 for compli"once with the Conditions of Approval. Staff identified several issues regarding landscaping, lighting, wall treatments and hours of operation for review oy the Planning C(maission on Jar+dart' 3, 1985. At the applicant's request, the items were contii+ued to the Planning Commission meeting of January 23rd. At the January 23rd meeting, the Commission reviewed the outstanding issues and determines that the project was substantially in compliance with the Conditions of Approval for Conditional Use Permit 83-04 with the exception of groundcover installation for erosion control on church property north of the existing facilities. During the hearing, a church representative indicated that the 3.4 acre .irea; was initially seeded with groundcover; however, the seed had failed since no irrigation system was installed. The Commission reached the consensus that the church should re-seed graded areas with a drought resistant wildflower, without irrigation. �I c; ITEM N PL.RNNati6 .GOh�9f SID REPORT 1. CUP Sa3-21 ALT$ LOJ4A CFR'3'5TIAN CHURCH Januar '1y4 Page 19B7" 1 c n III. ANALYSIS: Review of `"�#e site has shown that the church, has _- MEW n rally cp_%g1 d lwith all Conditions of llpprovat .for Condjtfonal Use Permit No 84-21. The Conditions of.Approuai for p the'.adjacent pre'schooT; .(CUP`,b-04) -heave not beep completed S howevor, fn that the vacalrit chYrch property, north of the`pre-school and parking-lr►t has b•Pcnme ove.�grown with needs -and littered ftith debris. me �1ack of .maintenance° fir the vacant .parcel: has.: resulted in severo -comalaish' from adja'eent'h9m€owners concerning' dust;and windb 6ffi'debr��.;, nt , «1 Y8.' FACTS Pay FINDINGS-. The Oa+el:o�ent Code alIOWs the Plappiqu, omm sMn ,,grant time extenslv. .. .for projects in 12=moaw increments, 'if�tnere;,nave`uCaR no sign icant changes irc the Land Use Element,;. Development Gode, or charc•cter cf an area, within which a project is bated that mould cause the -Approved project to become inconsistent_ or non-conforgJ11 ., Thus, the following findings must be met tc approve thtl '�aquested time oxtension: 1 I. That the proposed use is in accordance with the Gert�ral Plan, r objectives of the Development Code-, and the purposes of the district in which the stye is located. 2. That the proposed use together with the conditions applicable: thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety,. or welfare,', or material! injurious"-, to properties or ` improvements in the vicinity. _ s. That the proposed use complies with each of the appl,'icab1e provisions of the Development Cade. �`. F IV. RECOMM-ENDATION: "it is recommended that theme:' .Planning Commission =� continue this-Item for 30-455 days and direct the rturch to clear their vacant land of all weeds and debris and re.-eed it with a drought-resistant seed (such as Southwest Nil 0051). r ACity fully t` l r anner BB:GG:sgr Attachments: Letter from applicant dated Nove ber 24, 1986 Exhibit "A" - Staff Report for Conditionat' Use 1`ermit No. 84-21 Alta Loma Christian Church dated Novembe�-.t29,, 1984 Exhibit_"B" - Location Map Exhibit "C" - Master Site Plan Exhibit "D" Elevations r. a. �. O� ` 1 << �R; Thlf e rye OAVM L.1ieC6Al1Y A:TcL Co ul tiFi1 A November 24,,INV, City of Rancho Cucamonga ti Planning Division ; g320 Bineline 8oad,' Suite..C Rancho Cucaiuooga,,Cq '93r7a1 rZUP No L14-21 e . Resol. Non., 4-735' Exp.,Dates 1, J86 Subject: Extension-of existifig GondiVonal Use Pert, CUP 84e21 y Gentlemen, 1 06 Novembee 28, 1 , :, the Nita Lomb, Christian Church was r issued a Cchdi�tional Use PeMf't,,'CQIP, Ai:Ar the ten�porsry ' conversion of='a single family residence'inta a cif reii`r�fftice, �? The residence in qu€st:ior, is'owned,by•ttie churcind6 locate ,5 in the southeast corner of the church,,pioWt ief�r' to the attached info ,�Ati.on,:far a copy of the^sine plan and a 1,ist of , - conditions 1,4 fie ert-ginal ;permit. A1�s,b, the chur 'ership and employees have ettie,mpted,,to ,campTy with ailt the CUP conditions, and to the best of my knowledo*e none have been-;"violated. For the past two years, thfi residence has ,een used as a = church offic6�rnd it has not resulted in aay�,�Qct- ems * I the nei hbors or the c , ,unity, However, the growth-of the church r hasgbeen much slaw-khan what was origi" 11d.=6icteda Because of this $-low groA -pir iod which we have eupd•*tom `t` ;tFrz church is formally 8questirS`e two year extension,of o°rr Ln: �tionai Use Permit.., .` Respectively submj ted, r John Graham i President Alta Loma 'ChristiantChurch t ,l JG/mz —RECEIVED a M of KANCHO cUWM)tM ] Enclosure i •s an f qav 2 51986 AN PIA i 'YI�lyltliui�ljl��b:�l�l6 ` g� 4 r,•q»dsteaminsYi.+nGl fslbsnh/P where O dy the 8lb/e Is - CITY C�F,5,RA2 CHQ CUC.Pi,doNGA. c� � 81yMF La PORT 9 DATE: November �, 1984 :h y 1977 > ., To: Ch4irg!46 anJ Members of the Planning Commission FROM: °Rick Gome ;A'City Planner BY. Dano;,Putrino, Assistant Planner ' SUBJECT: ' ONDITIONAL USE. PEP-MIT, ,ice J84-21 - 'ALTA LOMA CHRISTIAN �CtlRCHr - A' .requesto convert an misting 1, fi$ square �.• 1t+`ot stngie family .�esiden� into arr office or aleAlta Loma Chr'isti�. 1 rulh on .25 acres of fond in the !ery Lose t Residential Distw �yt, located`at thewesi=•si;de.of Sapphire Street, across rba orange Street - APN 1062-332-23. i I. PROJECT AND SITE;DESCRIPT104: f A. Action, R_ _Requested: E,onvert single family residerce into a g church off- Tce.� 1 B. Purposea Provide admin\strative office facilities for Alta Loma Christian Church, 4 C. Location: 6390 Sapphire I`Jj 0. Parcel Size: .25 acres (10,8k!0 sq. ft.) E. Existing Zoning: Very Low Rec�iential F Existing Land Use: Single FamiljtResidentiai G. Surrounding land Use and Zoning: - ofi rt�- Ins.:;ty Mona c urcT, Very Low Residential South - Single Fwily Residential ;,Low Residential East Single Family Residential, Loa: Residential West - Institutional (6_40ch)e Very Low Residential H. General Plan Qesi nations: 'Project Site ow Residential (2-4 du/ac) North Lora Residential (2-4 du/ac) South - Low Residentia( 2-4 du/ac) East - 'tow Residential 2-4 du/ac West - Low Residential 12-4 dufac) i p �0 Q 5�1 RFPORT C,ilP 84 1 Z8 iriitiwo Church L PaG 2_ �b I. Site Qh`racteristics. Tha- subject:1) o erty is a rtetangul, _p s aTi'pen low '"�1�r s property is basi�afl)ly surraunded�,byhe i " . aaaceri ch�ur�en Oraperty. J. A.npli able` Re a�Tatio,n Ilia pEvelbpi�enIF;Cade per�iits o iac7 °it;es w�chin tn� uery, ,aw' Resicen$�aj d�is�ict. sdbect as a Ggnditor�"' Uite,Permit Inr adiiop �rkp,siauc+dre * a, iginaii desig�red as r4. dence-IWP be usO 4for d Tice use Ursa itit �hudig and,,stte e 'f raved tQ ieeti°code , re m`s for an roffice'`dekelopmen . J A. Back round,: On Qctcrbert• 1( , 1,9844 thr Planning Commission cont<.NUed,'Conditional Use Permit, M!i'I to. the a�Pp�Ticant _ ample time to revise Mans 1.�dicatinglfthe relairionship bg' tween the proposed use and the Master Plan �f the Alta Loma Christian Church. j On November A AM a. Mw,.ter Plan of the Alta Loma Christian Church, �i►;cogi'00ating. the convers`ioO of the sub3x�ct single family residence into'-'a church -offiire, was pres!_ntied tOo the Coi Commission. 'lie Planning 'Go i�ission continuer! rr�itional Use Permit No. 84.21 and Instructed ,ta�,,f!to draft a resolution for apprpv(!1 consideration. Al B. General: The attached resolution reflects the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 8441 with condign.s of approval. These conditions address the fol;lowinf4: 1. Conditional Use Peralit Time Limit 2. Hours of Operation RestrieLions F`. 3. Signage Requirements s 4. Occupancy Limitation 5.\. Landscaping A-v Limltations� Biting Impacts, 8 Building Code ke gbfrements i '9: Grading RequiremdAts C. Environmental Assesment: The proposed project has been 3et;erm,t; ed to- a categorically exen:pt.from the provisions of the Cal•tfornia Er enta QualWt, -Aut ('Section 15301, Class nn� 1) in which the cmveCJion of a singft; family to an officeuse will not have a I�hificant-environmental impact. IL �� ham• .14. �, r t - , ' III REGQI iEMD 17^YtSM-16! a� p o tPre �Qus Tanning Go*Uss�i'a6 irec on - t " _• Ron, e d I a, 'It Co. �s nn m e, t th eeF T ° ho "' je hepg3 � sfi�sen� e e v f � �� omyssAn supo� and o a a ; a i %esg; cooe de pAr�e• ' City/ P7 aver` RG:©?:ns \ttachmerots• T tter A p caist 1 k nit ,�� m - aster Site Plan .. ExhbT , Koar Plan ResnT4,ii to ,r /Ij 9 ��- ���� �:. �'..} {� K'{f[ if i�/.. M�, � _r•+ { i �59 "'r m T-1 JA �� .:.�1.. �`1., „a'�\�• 1 � �.rp a..� r '��w Q B� �@> @' til�.ila A i. 0 n}-:Oa�Olf�$r 0u �N.:,�_ I - � � , r . . � Y . rim— l_ S �F' / ��9' � ► '31 r,�• wm se.. _ rya>,jt.;� � alsa t--�•�=ht`"" �1*`--= .,a. 4 �\ +a to r� ea g ! SITE PLA14 f N P INO RTt-1 CIT Y O tTr�i= _y t�UP 8�_ A RANNCI-IC) CUG�MC ANGXA TtTt[:_LocArwy NCR PLAN,NINC, l,tVjsjei A_ ' ,Y ,/ r ,v ;. � z. .ri: ��„�r�'� ��r i : ! t 'tkli .lr�:�L r�• -,, tj tL It i La ( .tni a1' P i. i ��i?� ... 1,r '• �• i �, :�, �"'°`t 3' yZ zooIV 4 Ilia lid LS• � zs► �� Al-9 .. e. � r+'� i .-( � a � i t l �f ` ' t.I. ' Ei t•!+ .i'� i ����; `t �''•''�. EAST `�_ f.Xtr^Tih1i it:%1'tlPl�Or 6TUtG';TYPICAL--^'� . lAv at-k4.r TDkTt'Rrt.A WApG s'O1NG, AF°PL.Y-_ HRY C,Cc+ItlPR.BRAt C GAF Tom.1'Y!<1Ca-de4. " T�:1�TPutePgstsr fly 'E ro rite IL NilILI 't' jiff + _� } t%,� t✓y','"•.`i! s :y1•.ij v... ' •' tc �r �Y�i{!7 JliTfill is zN, , T •t s ti3 5ku t ,►novcrtr�It tG; ra n+iau`Im w waaa - g ma rv�ova, triyw Now ' arlx,- o, ttrheaR.4c S.,_-�; . 4 �t•:" t tt��jje�t r t'r. .# •� E .it.� ��Tt�� s � ; ti' t s ti�a aC Slu. 3ti:3ac .,.. `` NekV 1 +i ftc•X�,t{ PIK TelM n7e0 MU6TlPUlct�l,3K,P!`C'JCN601„ ('.map, f �TIV;i-29 fiDlNsh,, TYPEOA:.ZL i14■ p_�;3 2-1 NGA PLA.NNINC DIVSM EXHIBIT-—LS : SCALD�fnc a A)- x: CI'1.'u C`F RANCHO CMA�f1��C4 `i Q UATC: Jgnuar,,1 19g7 ~ ' t9h� TO: �hpaia� anuldeers of the Plannt,ny: oaigsiorr" FROM: ',Bead Biil ter,`clq banner SY. Ueura Meier, As`ais�ant Planner k S4B—JtCT: eNYtT�RQ _t T i. AS_Si a�jE1iT At.9 :;t1 viL4 IE�d 0�2 A tit^.MBn1` � s� x 'ZU`t t? n;am ue�t � off,R vn c 63 P A MP P?e �spsr E�nde.per�ta �iiing to arc g' ]v¢ str�lsinlj I. ANALYSIS, 1�he -lanning�Gc-sizsion has-ar6lously'41rected.staff to oTot`tna equirvwg doulbla str ping f parkf.ng lots, Ni:th �jthe , ;�ooption s n;late 1r98` o they City"s, f�ruomrenens;c*e 61. ,ode, , of City chen�3s�rc5 req�i ew T.:a.,`� a �oublr� s 'e p� fio''a ' ��Ingle si ri it� Gdit,,m si ontirs Itaua express 27 'wncern :sever pr,,od ects hrecently,c6hpleted'var h£ jingle itT4 st'rvping Th6 ZommissJi as J�nairated that a dou-..6 i`fne or,;v des greater-visuaa g�idaroc�`fun tie driver parking their oar. ' Tt'a, Feeling,i-AOAt a s-$n a line r` stQi a resetts„in (1) the car being oarked tea 6 ose to'the l,n ��at,ng :�fticuvtty ,for persons- get lij7l i-"Aut of -the inn, (2) Y M rncreas ,g ;-door damage to adjacent cars,,and (3) reducing safe" .y E vema a Zeparatf6n 5 1'fit 7,• ,_ r The following lAngua.ge is'suggested to require double;line striping in.All comnercial,,in��:,trial• and residential areas: 12. Striping: Al,f, parking stalls I � be cleariy striped and perieanefttl,y maintained with double or r hairpin >lines on ('"he surface of the, parking facility, 'With the two (2) lines. lacated'an equal oir nine (9) Anchesooln ether side of the :'tali !; sidelines. In all parking'fi?�?fides, all aslet<, approacn lanes, and maaeuvering ,ar=as shall oe cleariy marked with directional areas and lines to' expedite traffic movement. 0: — TTE a r. 3 y U.� AkC'0 CUB lO GA a%arON Page Z ENVIItOtdP PlT st, a Staff has :odip, ed ari Ix,«of� e 5! nv r:Qnment ec a s and canc�i,iad tha9 the r edn {I <s P� P rd oL Acreate sip n7ca $>`kaaY rse r e ui�� nmena marts , s N,n ' 'ire(erefore;�st � ecOmm n ,ssu`nce of tlega ,ivQ Oe a a ,y r %%% CUItRES�ONpE(dLE4' i,3s�"4it�n t a ad er*is�d as o.. pub li--o 'aea ang in t Fie a ' epa�rt eev�s - Ill. ;RECO, MEN'��T4IQf° i I��� rortesded than ther`1 am�;��� t%o'i soon_ , nea g cneidesot t o"execs Ca',mn`unrtdcmie�ir n i�ssu<,,ce aft�a n vca"a"rah toh di h ��ye�De o _ bradr # C)'ii}y�jP1 ni, rID _ �t Attakhments, Exhibit u�u' String`Details. " Wsalni<iori at, jr 7 F 't k r V e j, f1 4 1 7,11 e, :''Olt TH, CITY �s'li Q �'i^.� PLANNING DINTISICXN F.X IMT: SCALE- pp _� Ik �RESOLUTION N0. A`REgUTIfHi OF TIE. R�,NCh'0 CUCAPiCNGA i?lAAtNINv'`C0t3�!:SSluii ii RECt I'srOPC' APPROVAL OF b) VtLOPMF5r ,CODE AME.011dAT`86.03 A�GEOIN8 S CTION 17.12 :C:lAti, �= THE 5EVEL0AENT CODE CF THE_Ca. RANC4ltl` CUC� iB�A, fEftdAIN18G TO,` PARKING LOT= STRIPING.:. WHEREAS, on 00 14.th day ,of' January, 1987 the Planning C,01"J,ssi,on held a duly advertised public bteriring ;p!lrsudntto Section 65854 of`. the California Govern, t Code;: and _ ' tir#EREAS, ti92 l�laiining(i' aMiission finds it ecessary`'to clar,'ify and a . revise the Develo nx C,a:k� regalations pertaining to garkIng lot,'striping requirem.nts. ,� SECTIOW is The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Ce*Ossicn iirds -that`the' v o�en ' lapropose eAent 85-03 Is ',en implekiiih tion o,- the neiei Plan goals and policies and_that the Generral �!lan Env>lr� ntal Icripact report ° adequately covers any` potential significant adverse � *a4s Further, the alat;ning Copwssior' fi�ecls that no`subsequent ''arr suppllo'k nftl Fnvirunuentsl IiTact report is I re4uirc-&.pursuant va Wvisiooh 1;i, Cfltgtet 1 Sa iwion 2116C of the P,hlic Resrources Code.. Sped fically, fnds: A. No substantial'chan6es are; ropased in aro, goiii or F polkiis which' would, require maPr revisi^nos t0 t4q+: 1 EIR, 711 B. No substantial charoges' !,rave occurred with respect"to the cirmstances. unde' which the 9rAJect is being r undertakenLL ; C. do new inforrfiation on the . proj,ect has becoie. available. SECTION 2: ill,The Raslch-) Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this pro-YPET—RM not create a' significant adverse impact or; the envihow. ent and recommends issuance of-a Negative Declaration on January;'14, 198'7. K04, UERLFORE, BE IT WSOLVED. 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of :the California government Codo,, that the ., Planning j Cornrrissics of the City 2f -honcho Crtcamonba hereby I recommends apor a! of-Development Code Amendment 86- 03 amending fiction IT:MWOAl2 as follows: Ik 12, Striping: All parking,,'stalls shall. be clearly (; at IR44d and permanently,inintained with 4orzrble or hairpin "lines- on,,,-thte surface of the parking r. facility, with the (2) lines being located an Ek. Q equal nine (9) inches on eitneT--side of the stall DCAb 68 Q1 U NG16 << " 777 Aage 2 , , `( w l g R a b. ade red �n a1 �ark�'ng fiar�a� al 1 x T6� ap r 0 lane^ Iadl,$ ,,nanec}WRring arear.� AgE, r'"X'.4aa ' �+ -�lireGk AAd arraus- s, �mt3ireik t � o'4htGog f�f '� i� Rg' l+� ta sand�relatd s'sp s- e; Pl nnin� Comm ian 3�eeby res .P`ds thL` the city Lr0M appeal nndN admit �veFA ,ertt <Lo e, pme�rdcseft Sb=�� : `s 0A%ed �t� i,R APPROVED AND ADOP S�jD�stH `S 1AiTtH DAk bF.JANUARY, 9,87. PL,FsF1NM C4!!�++1S41`ti'�'tiF`fHE`t�slV flF RAb1CNt� GUCA1�Im BY: { :. r E-'tuv Barker, `\, ATTESY �.; "bra ur, 'pu,Y re vary i,..Brad ,Duly, r, Day�,JY jS GGrata ?; of they Planning Cowliss*on of the City, of v �$ Raricl;o,Cucamo l�A, o +: xe��y erti�Y that�:the faregai:ng Reso),Utionf*n duly and - regullaily irt,-�.jced, .possed�, and adapted";by the,i0larm.ing Cosot ton of the t. city of�Iftnchc`CUcamdoga,.atRleaular meeti:ng;af the'I+taRning Coan�i sign:held , on the 14ts: dzy of 3anuary, 19,9'7., by the follbwing, vote-to-wit:' AYES: �:DI+�+l25 PNERS: 4vDE�t' CISSI©HERS: ^`Jy � - ABSENT: C€*X-4SXONEAS: 1 Yu:"'tz ._.,.�E`" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF RUM G�CAllf(3^, Z DATE: January 14, 1987 tsrr TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Co m,,,�sion FROM- Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Debra Meier, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRs I N= 0YN�1-£^-4ToAtL AS. ESSKENT AND*�D^EVmOPMENT REVIEW 9H-'36 RK -- 1-Ne 4#H$S4e�iRCfi conslrucc own approved "master Plan on Ts acres of land. phase 11 consisting -of a 380,000°square foot industriallwarerause building In the Gene;al" Industrial t, district- (Subarea 13.) located on tha south .sido of Sth ' Street 0eb)ee6 (fti•.$ and Cleveland Avenues - APH: O81-8,9,10 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Acticq_Requested* Approval of Phase It site plan and building I a ev.A+ ons and Issuance,of a Negative Qeclaratior.. { B. Surrounding Land use and Zoning: f or ac'nt Pnof Industrial Specific Flan Subarxa 11 South _ Existfnai jaim-1 Dynamics facile y; Industrial Specfffc."Plan Subarea 12 - East - Vacant lard, Industrial Specific Plan c3j0areal 11 West Vacant `amd, Industrial Specific Play 5uoarea B ' C.' General 71an Designatlenz: ro ec STte:UlfterairrIn"di ustrial North -: general Iitdustrial South A- Industrial Park East - General Indust.1a] West - industrial Park D. Site Characteristira: The site currently contains two exiting bulldinjs hotis 9g 11 a General Dynamics facilities and field Measurc-atent aroa. The entire length of Cleveland Avenue is now complete. Remaining Improvements on 6th St,^eet and Rica; Avenue will be complieted with this phase. The field mea>ureruent area 'will be rrwin ted (through separate application and -evxiew) To provide .iditional parkins (beyond City requiroments), ITEM P ii ;4'' r' Ste- . 1 r a;row- ! n 13 Cat C31 f t F.F. 4100. I . _, �!� .ram• .. F �,� � �,;��, , i '°���..w,. ,:.;men. '• MATCH ONE SEE SHEET C-2 � XCL .i • '� L 3 of VMORMK tsiFr, —_—_I r�rvee s�rtmrk sci i';t r NORTH CITE' OF, I RAINCI-110 C CANIONG ` PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBr � SG,F.� . P-� �G.. �.■ e r�J�1t471 J � �. 'WE�a� ,�3h, ✓i�t'�C W�,t���� taFr er::R�'�Yt�ldi 'gyp '�', u 1 1y AI r lot av'�.-n ��icv v+r 4 i�w�an�a„suF ,. y�1�...� 71111�1i �Ilgl�l�e o a ►.'w'Y � � y # .. tta . �avr ,.,\ 11 $ W r r Qdtl 6 F ;, s, Ag AOROVA; .�Ti�t��3€ EW.R- 'ti0l Sa 6 D 1n lw,, r� so ' RF dEEhdr U1ii AttE 's 1 , Avg E Y }'TEE G d dti NAI�S�Ti DI R�t; - 'FdPt r RIME N�#ER A „ � the uMh dad of i @ r"Y l qf,`=.ate, ao ihfr-.atibn gas f7edk fie,RanerPt`r�s iar`, eve!,c R3f abave. cr'i,bti�arc�a"ec aa;i tiiiE �`\t�a tt�ie day, of,-1 anu-, � �g8fi, the PTanmi;rg Gb iSsiee a:sa �sn :1�p,c s Cder trite atidv -cie a�°fibedt p ,ectti Mill ;'P"MEFORs ,�the Rancho C4' n jp,Nbrrnt�ng;`Go�?�ss�onk re��T�v� ,as f6l ows: Z�;, SECT-16 =I:.. Tt nt.the fo3,T*Ingi cayr be-wt<. i. ThAt aae-=gIwPs�' p,cJect i consfl it-ent with; R od t� tives G derr?l Plan and 2. nsi tom* i>r'th4posed° use: 14 in,:. accor&. w� oses oWect,#ve a ;. e ]WaeTop t Cade and' the of the: dis,�r�ia'. in=r,�i k tok,sit fs To;aIed- and, - 3. That thik,N opossd°use s i#�, comF►Tlance w-t, tAc6i of %e appl h�T'e Pr 6isians of,tile, dleveiopg nt ode; and 4. That the proposedi uses toges3�er w °tt�; e conditions v applicable thereta.,'wsyT-' not be, ttetriwr;ta+l to, the pUN'ric i hoa7It�,, ' afetx,F. dr a�If=are, �►r wateriral:Ty idurfp is pi�'nik es or improve nts ire the z aicini,ty- SECCIOH 2, That this projLl eut wilT not create adverse iimpacts on the envir�nrent at a negative Declaration is issued on January, i4. 1987- SECTIO1d 3: Thai; DevelopmentReview k. �3-36 is approved subject to the follow pr3 cc: . tions and attached Standard ConUittens: Planning Division I. The landscape treatment along 6th stre@� and along ,the north es dtion shall be intensified to provide the , ee of A prami►ence desired along c Special Boulevard. r 1 PLANNING CMI4Rk AeSOLVION.NO. OR 86=36 CirNi RA1. IwirIMICS January 14, 1987 Page 2 zt; rr f. a` Engineering Division 1. Overhead Utilities a. 4th Street The existing overhead: utilities (telecosmnication and electrical, excepting, 66 ,KY` i° efeeerical) shall be`undergrounded east of Cleveland,Avenue prf6r to occupancy of Building No. 603. Rafmbursr.}gene of one-half q adopted cost of undergramonding fro,c future develop.( as it�occurs on the opposite,.side of f,ie street is not f"Oble because the property_Is 1ec:Ated isr the City of Ontario. b. Cleveland Avenue - The existing overhead utilities (electrical, and telecommunication) ,shall,Ibj undergrounded fry the first pole on the north side- of4h.Street to the first Pete on the north side of 6th Strut prior to occupancy. Reiaburse ent of one-half of,the adopted crest' of u� rgrounding from future devel^ nt as i'c .occurs an the/�pposite side of the street is feasible`, because the prop rty is undeveloped. c. Al in-lieu fEe as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecamnication electrical) on the opposite side of 6th' Street :shale' ,e paid to the City prior to- the issuiinLe of building permits:. T!!e fee shall be one-half the adopted unit amount times the length from tine center of Cleveland Avenue to the center of Utica Street. 2. Utica Avenue shall be constructed from 6th ",treet to meet the existing portion to the south or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. k shall lave a 26 foot wide pavement within a. 40 Moot wide-dedication prior to acceptance by the City for ,eaintenance. If the additional 13 foot dedication cannot 6e obtained prior to permit issuance, a standard 22 foot wide half street pavement shall be constructed within the existing 27 foot wide offer of dedication. Construction shall be to City Standards under an encroachment permit. 3. The improvements to 4th Street shall be constructed prior to the occupancy of Building No. 603 APPROVED AND ADOPTED TNIS114TIi DAY OF JANUARY, 1987. PLANNING COMISSION OF THE CITY OF MR-CHO CUCAM,ONGA BY: E. David a er, Chairman- IV AMST: �, 13'ra u er, ep%i eedretary 17 Rage I, Brad 5'a1,Co4°, ikp� St ile Sys ofi the: PtaQBi,n co ds n of th4 d icy' o Rancho cucaagin ;t> a ehYl cek if 'Wit he o egoi g`eso� i�an��wa5 regul arty i tqi% o"` bass A, d ae op `, bye Lit " tea t q`f i�s� city of Raftho �s ga, F a..�' ula � annirtc�°Gopa�iiss� on'the l4th day i"' Manua ,19�7, 6y th ''i n"t Ft ng vote-tO-w<iti ` AYES: COWIsS 0ONS", `NOES: CO ABSENT: € ct +kl$5I01! R&: t 7 y 1` o �11 r ' r ili:qyy� . 3C ' w"R O iiL d• L, n ,. ® ;dye. Lp..g Laa �, �5 ,`.�'i.xg.N M=FQ 4•�f'N mN"� M .� 'Y w�bg$ I: ;� p$ba>pYp GCR n+ `5F � A� srn `ae g� va m ,n bQ ggbNL--� ttr V� ` Kit F O�`�'} @pba �p V .La'�trtlp nKCyg t�04 owt.µ. stKI O �C� G rd?�p KWW 1M't.�•ft i��s SRO tltl* ��g� v �,.n� :1 �'S?� I' i Sz �' `Nl •yr '`62 ,c �L '� � ` N'g�^. A�yye asuu��\e 8 •ti� II �t)11N�Lp p@ L V1�i app W w —_ .. tea ,q G'Q Ts r' E ___Ayoapyy���`"� �u% �jg ' " �al-^( gQ. GYa� M'll rqq as R a+ j�•Q $ ,y�atlycc 'y^• 7y�! ®,G" ppp�, R6� .yO��tlp�G.ytla'.; it �, �w N�.p4�ML.ill��ti ��tl.�W :KY�n �M�• Mi.. 'F A�f�.\I��G4•lUl qxv NY Y4t Ug• g� Sn�aQi>4 ' f'q mob. i Lo C ~raw AtlCr Y{AL lY C6 Y�Nyy �. N s Cep r'g My "tlt�t v� V 71• Gp �a. PA �Ny it swP��+'� ♦y`y� ` 1' n L C .C" O CI 3 � c 1�t ����-'• �`.3 � r� - N a Ga i� Q � is.. 7'"� .pz'� •'cam. 4 G ='f/t it R��Z G 4 I.t../.•-M wN.•i Nr�i'NI.'i�+.. �I ,tip I .:• F � � •� � '. 55 S� X.— g¢ TOC Oa+ uaC U:.1U aCY q OLmO �� CU 4 9 O:r NV cC y�.■�aa � @NF` dYq _' �^ 4 ',. Ca rP SR LYet Yy'.i 8,fYt r! 5yY9Y z 4r n$x WG.7�C�¢V LO V:Luw GN4 WNd Y y �lx YQ g K 4 Y CYO O .quo Z g� C q y y a N Y x Y O d! �ww�e d Y m q W P 'O 6 a G Y ZLJG N 7agr0 nL�r ti4�°ti 1� 9 nU pO. 4 c� 5...v.t0. DC iM �$y� NY@y.N GQ.W. 0101.0 ,`� (N m.GO.G aU�S Vy'� N q$Na S^. .`YXyyyy"... yC2 Lr4O� ^L i`LyQp COSY cam$.^Q Lii.,;4�O�YN 6N�d fi m"':a msacl NNg1 nit.� Y N:d L GL.W^ ,.,g CN j.l _ CCY COC dC5^� rG.r YL Y�y.L.N 14xFa;.....�1' �$- = O .aki VC r �qOC j ILr 4/geE���� 3J y�YC•QN d«il s 3?' N! 4�i LYy79 GRLf 4 O.O ♦ 6^rG.N .f.Y.q cg. .. O ao,a.�9lol- .�OC YG�. d ^^�y gyp.Mwl rj yy�y�l '161t G`�j¢ S7� y�40 pY C4..0 L O4ypp ♦:naY. 44 �.c0.Y p� n»U Ti '9C ay+N M p{ N�, u aCOC NS K:Y�fI�.�FM q�=OI—;B U' OY ^C TC' � LG' ffi U O .p WW `3 po C �k O9M WY�� N. 9 R• I�• �G ?'^= LM i A C �9 0.01L0` Sir.TY ' U 2 aM m w� 1!"`.. 6Cl HE O„Uaj^y Oyv.e��yN ^U� q�i Yp~N Y C��a4Uu OEN ^O..V UA�M OrYr G ma+Sa 4a�Ip�$ao. oVaI Y� 4R..aqONL ' f f yML. p dY tip .4 !'^;w di.iy� eldN, y. �� �� C gN -'O' $`' •oa swaaLy1.51 cY. rnL .q Is 5Via. n TZ aN� x " =ar Rx$y. 'a ``�uNsLpLp�'Y .Y.'y my ,4Cj f8a RYA Od` �6 y44'N.^L 'N>��pp drL:edsi sGCQ Lq. z4'V x4-�s�9Et "Uc CO jj W d . � � �4N Z�� C4 $ 2. Y-5g4= ole vTazt--z 0 L s. y^ '61 UOU yUU L6� N C4 q''C���ii{{Op ppRq�CC' C�34 NCC�uC.. m^ u O pC��C NY6 'S' y. L V1� uYF ` oil B Ml N� L`Oh4 s qu. �C Q4CC Y.Y` 5Cz H3A 4 r.' GC CC�,C COw:.'u Oe vC�o A. i1 d $ ' Ya ad d N@ o a�urn -4 a aZL.oL. d' �. va�wtR` aY�c. Nuu vd. Nund. adi aYYL �.'cn :o ' sNron,c F« hG�i<ui.nca 9_c3 a�OA4pdy.: GYOr L'�' ^GY L+GOOLGaL 1.L1 .Z. U Y GtN R ■ �Lbpy. ... a u e+v 04 p L a'Cd ►fN .Y �"• IS AIO P016G7 N Y t:T L G Ub Y q G�O M dq0 CY� O� G,~ut O. ��\� ANC O O• 00 �� VPO �bONrOi09.' 01"U �A1 ��fJOQ t ddggN UOY IT. =q ypL� W..N Yr �Wy,.0 ONUM^, V GG Tf l•:..0,O�s.. PYVLI �dM L Gr. aL WC y�y.rJ[ CA.a..4q:.0 71CCC L G 'R'S�n'.y 0 O.y� NL 20 d 6 A r�T'r Yn O Y C yybN Ga �lV 4+..GG. ,LF //gg M.� fr dyao��!ryl O G 4� 9 .S'.A'T y" a L' p,Yf hj O,2,a aGTG 6yL� �pY4rtN �G,N s� b¢Sttgp M NVy�Y'° �,.PG. "YpQ`�p^ NY djN .. IN tl4 Y`axi: :.yp .rt Y1 y'I:y pttF Cl VaY. 6ys�tlyt.o C,r ;9V `� q d. Qln Yr=.4yN iC wLLfyS.,CA `@{re'. N L Lli� f� � LF�CI.q' O� p „Wy � 2Yq Cp.NV r 6 Wr q b q y3d soLL ecggcgS� Npb 1fo'li (i Q1'i Yi tHr V4N .y ma k-SftS In=wdr.^. ¢w.q <vat atMa 1-Nt <tvu •=rni are w'oa.�. red b au. W• aw r � ' p`A, E'z It '1 U p M N p C ~ LH. �aM C L y G P C Gc ifj� qN6 d�^ p p 3U� tl 99 y^ vp� oa �5 �aa •d,N• a �` a YiL'r i ' CC N C C Op PYg.. P Ud. LN S.a aCC� G,p N. & 3A� N�1_L ..tth C�EEy LalMOQw.Y�i ^.6 G.. qi q..L�. J.� y OW O9CydCy� W d G as 6 6 per. T yY n.. � V G O. N2 dd T'Nc $ z� a' U d: 4. V C y Lp+O tl...RR� 2— yst; -a— L HV tp. Yp Gu Py T ¢ y 4r O p p� Cm pq' Op' A d bWpw MINN.^O l aCC4 N r�t6 C C�4 d a yt 6ti Y� d,tA` tit Gw P Mw G cL.p,� iC.0 Wrq GO B. GpWU Ls �N ti9.5 �N T]qt Cip.� . "'s�' wC3� G �p�yLp E u6'. S3W LO. � �� GLq :.rad LN 4]GL 0.iv'\>L�(- ZTL as 1fLaiy,^Mp o �Lr 's1C g@g@UhL.YdLh.. d. 1\I y Cq 9l �J pS C W + y. I�.d97Y�'.. A dM « L .O..tS�y a Q N�nl i w"w 'ls-... 'n�3', .N t '.Mn �°'Ym 'q� CL�am- ,on^y2 •R 4'-� 41 '�..�, ��a�. QuS mb-` i8-:m HL�,-�' «. ^n x...�.e $�T,�(• of _ �ou mV�mdwedws C.C1" � ynw M.GC+gY �' Jw`O^••YmYi XY M■ Ca�pVk�H �'O C'dV pps, A-O pLL 'Oy M^ p. mQL AL �tY'S �� .F V a.. NAw yVaii:9 GY O m �ON L J} m C b O W, 4• t{�IyF N. V i Z iiiy�� "`CW `SwN CdF § gM '.}YNW6AV L tl mC o^ y T bt �in 'eyO1 QA u u Let'l�r: aq N L,gYpq„�� y. wMm'•' 'pG'�,'YN.c.. a�i ' _ss Yp9� 1s. 6LISN �q. .+ u : � W Imo. 4Lu. �A�sG V' O:nj Iy (a a 1I 4�.. Adak ..ate li yyt O�$ �o Y : as ts�a �rN ow'r� p' Cn KlmOt� TN ` • CY MW^#J at. 9P O...VaL `` ti 4C Vd OA 22- PL.. q� WW04Nl C as VN Y C 9 L yCq. 3� pd 0 wP� L. OaB-.. Sew Cv } �. a L4,S.DMm. �¢Cf.Y CJD yAp �` C O �'df ~- MN q,tt qT.. YN � i9 V Q'i Gsq YA u en a N- Fw31 e 8 g o LY Y ooYNa d :g.,..v� ' NY aN N R��• � 9�C. � Nj� �fOR�� N1, yNw W�7[p Zoo 'Q .+ Y QNO pOL Ca, �l HE b aNGi N tvVti�p y... NppOa�4 v41 LL6L p�g...q k Y i J rr_ tl� d� r ,. E51�4. g" s a tl Lea u t �9 .a`.b0 yY 1r N Y Mb Ga ' na L „ 9 Cgg ,.N M yyv tl V ♦.. _O d gi1bb... `n 4 g $ e a d r 8 �Oe■Qaa �4 ■N.: �p yE. A NN .�,.1CLatl \)POO A. Alt I yg« �N+Ilibo. EN VtT�V'"+R Vb .PYaf �Sb •rFS`p4 G'�J 6 +S �V V• ~ 4 ", 01 N1s� tl D.1 ace ' re $¢¢$SCww..VV 604 NO:R; Cg� ` t�p[:3 �H Yr-.,.Ypc a. �Cp•ii ,uy�af }M�ij f�L �, r.,tl,.r63. b rffi $ 3Et ggo.�j t 2- r L{i 4.0 E MA �u tlM iiaFF Uy� ON� L�F,py 31Q ON�w� p4.y.Wq g. iiii Nbal aY Z. +cieAg va VVu. or^ ice. �� u'�•YY �c o �+ $=n. �_` L'`g c «�C .$ c'^.S :4p;sue �C rwa. Vyw a'„r aY �.� NO N N6 Va6 GGl�Y���i E966� G44: am' V�VY! M� �� 6^�y{$`. tl a c:ON a 0. �Q �040 L �l4 Mrs: VVC.Q'P �tl2 d$V� i l3 f$ �'•� r^AP ap.. L$N i•�c~Y,O 4.'o.L aUO La pa F d�. N P .�! P9i 0. V V': !�' C.w� ..r S. .+ �.�V.�i P V�..N •w Y ��4. 5 O+ G' I: M1 t Ov Y V L @ppp EC� KCb LAN �OY� PVC+.. Vi d0+[ d`. B N.u4 N t1 EKE s��y 9 9 4 i7 0 6+�" Tki 4nPi4 WLV �-C 4i�0.E C'rg0 �.P4 I�+a �S S .1? Y t �s .� ���.Y�� .'�' a ��aa�. � i � � Y 4w.A• ,rs c ", v � y,�`'a`� ate-. v. 2e � '�:`a N a4'.. a •. ,�. .!-+ � .. 41 �N' Ci {sy 4�. d'w �A L R C�eyyY YN '1 p®'Q Y� 6 � ® A i.Y'9 •� p O y a yw '.M i N, W a� � • � GHQ ... C � � Q v4NY tiY» >Np� p` �Yyv YY G ay ^. 7N9' .gab My 21,•C+�O {i ^N'Y v Q ` �N .1C YYO 4 -it 8r N 1 G .ice L c v L�$ $ erg • �._ "Q S " 4 `YqY�•C M&{ µ �_ 4S 0' A µey 3. L 1 g •per. gu o-Y �a y �jy A ... y( LL, Y i• �w N p/ u Y tp Qtu t" fast A2Qtl ii rrs ift 1aN aL� µ . [?A Ad`Y- iVy IJ...4 W ppr/R N u I Y.M O.jl�r rp1Q 4�py�' lM w�' �6 ,•C- yp4, ,C w. %/ C= Y�r 9 w•i.' { V� ��/q � f{/ C'q ,°�.� w itq,, FAuY:t �C Y N ]y S4a yy $ UL�, JNC. ,AO w �� Y G o� zt! at ap6i �{3 1 Yy] k■yC lE.D ep YCN vYV' C C3� • p6 d Val k r N N � � •Yl p ��K Y R N �` tlQ • � !� NL ` U� 11` $9N Y .iai+u Gp L 6Y �,�p C tl {Cyr ]..O y Eµ. ■$a tlQ Y.wO Mb G CpPN CYp i �V �• G�6~ W µW Y Z Y p 4 CC YC?Y VV i _ U♦ <4. Y. '/Jr V. 0 ny -N GYM y.n N 4 a • \4`f,Fr G Y / N �1 4 i .LY,•;s+� a`o;a g `,.-. e�w .. .... a. � ,a +La �r�... uw Y� �%1 � 4u� •Ow or L Dom= L 3aa tl o E gsrp �wv all 6 �gf b �Ris ■ CCo _yy y Y z4v Ls^C V Iy�YI Y Y•..•�. QY wP V_ �P =u Y D N W� L Y L R� D ■ yY, ag a.. Awe YVs 'wA R6 O' O TuG a.Y LJ. t C p`V p. >Y O L • p J VV V�d 4 »pb= y yr V+C YYYp. Y OCb s•. Jp Yyp p {gyp} y V y >D A. G i L N L. A V L qGc q M.Yo D qR V p S W ap »y Y b G ?M Cv6.. n» D r V ■ !w''UJ C`V Y3 p' s_ V it •a Y� L NO LYC ~J cb "'. .i V tir• C�dL COYb tl `��b �C b +�� Pp OPazYY f L _7 •.»D W V p C D L ►F.w�i-. has z:... Y �Ch� u•= nv I Izl l I l CITY OF� .!6-10 CUCAIt ONGA co STAB REPOT i } DATE: January 14, 1487 1977 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Greg Gage, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: HOME OCCIUPATION PER14IT 86-210 - TAYLOR - Appeal of Staff 111 ec s on denyping a Rome ccupa ;on Permit at 81159 Mat achiate Avenue,, ' I. BACKGROUND:; Jn .October 21, 1986, Mr. Joe Taylor` subipitted an appTi`c'a€iQn'for a Home Qccupation Permit to allow contitruction of styrofoam sign inserts within the garage of a single family residence located at 8159 Malachite Avenue. The application. indicates that Styrofoam sign, :oserts w- th faces no larger than 3', �,. feet,by 8 feet would be 'fabricated, utilizing mechanized saws as &y= well as glues. The garage wa-, previously used by a former owner for a non-conforming upholster$%'shop. II. ANALYSIS: A Home Qccupation is definea`by the OeVelopmen'C Code as: "HOME OCCUPATION: An accessory occupational use conducted by a resident of a dweill.ng as a sfcondary, use thereof, which is conducted, entirel3. Athin a; dwelling by the inhabitants thereof, which use-fi clearly incidental to the use of the structure for dwelling' purposes and which does not change the, character theireof, and for which there is no display, no stock-in-trade, no commodity sold on the "premises and, no mechanical equipment used cccpt that necessary for housekeeping 1 i:�jrposes Applications for Home Occupation. Permits are evaluated on the basis' of fourteen specific criteria, to assure that such occupations are compatible with the residential character of the surrounding; neighborhood. These include; o 4The use of the dwelling for such home occupation shall be clearly incidental and subordinate to its use for residential purposes by its inhabitants, u ITEM 4 PLANNING.COMAISSI,O?i STAFF Rf'_ORT p HOP86-21.0 - TAYLOR E Jauary 14, 1RS7 r Page 2 u " r ear ^' . o No; equipment or proc,e_les: shall be used on a subject property which creates :noise, smoke, glare, fumes, �w odor, vibration, etectrical, radio orL televi2i4a �. interference disruptive to surrounding properties." o "There shall bc! no change is the outward appearance of the building or pre+ei:tes,. or other visible evidence of ¢ the activity." k o, "The use shall, nV4 involve storage of materials or supplies in an accessory building or outside any structures."' . Staff's review of the proposal resulted in the deterwination that i the use would not conform to the above criteria, for the following; reasons; A sign construction business is, of more intensitvr-,.: use and would be incompatible, with the primary residential use of the Neighborhood. The applicant has clearly stated that she, property was purchased to "operate a small business." The operation of mechanized saws and the application of glues on the property could generate noise, vibration and fumes which would be detrimental to addacent residential properties. Fabrication and storage of signs is being conducted outside the buildings which changes the: outward appearance of the premises. The applicant is storing matert-rls in two: accessory storage buildings. III. RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis, Staff recrumends a_ the Planng.Commission determine the proposed Home Occupation to be inconsistent with the intent of the Home Occupation regulations and deny the; appeal of Home Occupation Permit 86-210. Al1,yee ynew AVOL BB:GG:vc Attachments: Home Occupation: Permit 86-210 Application Exhibit "A" Letter of Appeal Exhibit "B" -- Letter of,Denial 0-2, 1� ' � l,: o E3yNEfE7W.fET�t a� q a -IF � r SU&"ECT: APPEAL TO DENIAL OF BUSINESS OPERATING LICENSE IN CUCkJQNGA, CALIFORNIA. THERE WILL, BE. VERB' LITTLE CUi"S"?.,4G.ON THE PREMISE,i. } A LOT IESS THAN iTHE'OWNER BEFORE ME WHO DID .U`PHOLSTERING FOR A GOOD 8 OR 9 YEARS OR MORE. *7,E BOUGAiT TR-, HOB ~ SO THAT WE COTiLD OPERATE-.A SMALL BUSINESS OR Ws. WOI#LD, NOT HAVE PURCHASED THIS PROPERTJX. SINCE THE; FIREWORKS OF ME BEING 'TURNED DOWN AEM, - I APPLIED FOR A LICENSE AND YOU DID NOT HAVE TO SITE ME I DID A'LI'T^sLE INVESTIGATING ON MY()WN OF OMSER IN-H')ME �I �i OPERATING SITUATIONS. THERE ARE A LOT OF WETDER$, MECHAN3CSr CABINET MAKERS =AND UPHO7,TERERS, PLUS OMER BUSINESSES GOING ON. IN RIDING AND OBSERVING I WONDERED TO MYSELF ; HOW MANY O.F THESE PEOPLE TOOK THE TIME TO EVEN APPLY AS s I DID TO, DO IT THE RIGHT WAY, BUT MOST OF ALL CONFORM TO THE RULES AND REGULATIONS THE CITY WANTS. I ONLY WANT TO OBE Y AND FOLLOW THE CORRECT GUIDE LINES, BUT I WILL NOT BE lA VICTIM OF CIRCUMSTANCES. „I WANT NO TROUBLE I JUST` WANT TO LIVE A PEACEFUL LIFE IN A FINE CITY WI-PH My SMALL BUSINESS. PLEASE SET A COURT DATE AND I WILL BE THERE. THANK YOU. � R CITY OF RANCHO GUC ` gbh-GA a !� xaya teP9sy rtinF , awta x Biquet a ton D.UU, Rkhml K Dahl Pamela L WrI& �t October 230 1986 Jae Taylor - 8159 Malachite AvenLa Rancho Cucamonga, California 917,34 SUBJECT: Mki OCCUPATION PERMIT 86 21Q' Dear Mr. Taylor: T, 't City is in receipt,of Your application of October 21, IIM6`'n3r a .:ae Occupation Permit to con!ttruct. styrgfoam sign inserts at 8159 ,41achite Avenue.: ` Thn: intent of a<hvAe occupation is to'allow a resident to don(j%j.—an accessory occupational use that is contained entirely within the!hodaeS and is incidental' to the allowed. residential use. Such uses)r,hovld nit vary gr atly frmthose normlly fouikl within a residential ar+aa. The eligibility .of a use for 4% Occupation Pemit ``s &terminec through the evalustir#i of fourtfen specific criteria, white are listed' on the back of the Bone Occupation �erinit application. Through staff~ review It has cent determined that the proposed use does rct nv�+ th^ rollewing' criter 3.: o That the proposed use be inctaentai and subordinate' to. the residential. use. It, is the City's deterarination that a sign constr.."?!ction, business is of more intensive use than allowed by the definition of a home occupation and %could be incompatible with the primary residential use. o No equipment or processes shall be used on the subject property which creates noise, smaae, glare, fumes, odor, vibration, electrical, radio: or televiston interferance disruptive ti surrounding properties. Your, application indicates that sign inserts no;—'Arger than 3 feet by 8 feet would-- be cons-` uctedrh a the premises utilizing 'motorged tools as well as glue. Such processes typically generate noise or eme sston which could adversely ii4act surrounding residential properties. r � �f Oct. obe NOW21"Ok y Due, to the, reasons a�uor`e,.yayr i` tiros far }dy/��y (Bcu at o �i.:h a�pAlik Ica} e�}. �6.C has. be denileds f oo ge st r than tau 1'®rats �yau Uscoerciat' Indt* tiC&� area t`a esI �,au haves d:Z!'d4ue` �on easedo t itate� acm act tees Ridnnyi�g Diri�siPos� ��} ¢ iri ,Roa .or a (C7«1`4►; 98 3861€.. R Satoe�jya �;, 4' P Ilan Y�S�IfJNt �� `« Da h, 5nfor Planndr^, cc: Betty K{ng Business license I f 3 1 ty of Rancho Horse Occupation Cucamonga Permit- Applic-4011 Z GENERAL IINFt MMATIOM 0. LOCATION OF PROPOSED HI�OO�M�dE OCCUPATION- - - V✓` NAME OF PROPOSED BUSINESS APPWANTS NAMENAME - _ V � ADDRESS. y OWNP; ❑ RENTER e: Property owner's signature will be raquired,or <� a signed statement from the owner apj}raving _j such use of the dwelling must be submitted CL with this application. ! Property Owner'sSigraturer: zUj opc FULL DE5CRIP ION OF PROPOSED BUSINESS-BE CIFIO MIS SsYk RAM Ttl PF 1 Al 7;* u► LLB 0 .FULL DCSCR1PTION OF BUSIMY{+S ACTIVITY OCOURt4iNf3 IN DMJI Nti;,INCLUDING EOUIPMENTANO AMOUNT OF DWELLING USED— BE SPECIFIC gc Ci Z; I hereby certify that I have read the Home Occupatlon Permit requirements, futly understaid this-- Impiicati ,and can comply with all of these requirements. LU &w" a SIGNA URE :�v r.' A f .77 9 A Homa6ccupat�ion Is atr acc"ssstssry occupational use conducted by a tesid nt d%Jiling as a secon• dory use thereof,which Is conotl6ted entirely within a dwelling by the dnhallAants,which use is c{eaily Incidental to the use the structure for dwelling purposes,which does not change the character;of the building or neighbor 000-;eras fafiwhich there Is no display,no stock-in-trade,no commodity sold on the premises'and no ri hanlcal equitiment uVtl except that necessarf for housekeepieq purposes,The Home Occupation Permit may be gt anted irxr t specific use If it meals the c0torla liafed on this page. t. The uk1t of the dwelling;for such her►te Occupation shall be Wearly 1poidental and subordinate,o its use fo6,,R- dentlat purposes by Ito inhabitants. Z. No persons ote'+r then members of tke family who residWon the.premises shall be engaged In such activity. 31 There shall be no chiii o in.the outward appearance of E'rte building ar promises,or Other visible evidence of"the activity. 4, There shall bens sales of products on the premises,except produce(fruit or vegetables)grown an the subjpcE property. S. The use shall not ailow customers or clientele to vialf,dwellings.However,incidental uses such as music lessons,and the sale,jt produce may be permitted Ili the{ntenelty of such instruct-W s Is approved by the City-Planner. 6. No equipment or roconos shall be used on the subject property fg' P j p perly which creates aYmb.�T,- J glare,fumes,of tA,,vibratiun,electrical,radio or television interference disruptive to surror3��dtn propertles. 7. No home occupation shall be condooted in an ac+'assory building,Normal use of the garage may be permitted If such umdoes not obstruct required parkitil; 8. Not more than 15"/o of the total square footage of the dwelling,or one room of tilt,dwelling, whichever is less,aha{i be used for the home vccupatlsn: 9. The use shall not involve storage of materials Or supplies in art accessory building;rroutside any structures. 10. Useof the United States Postal Service in conjunction with the home occupation ohtail be done by means of a post office Wt.` 11. No signs shall be displayed In conjunction with the home'occupation,and there shall be no adver- tising using the home address. 12. A home occupation permit is hot valid until a current City business license is obt€gined. ` 13. The use shall not involve thar.use.of comma rclall vehrctes 1irardelIvOry of materials N)or from the premises,ofherthan a vehicle not to exceed a capacity of t/Ja tws,owned by the operator of such home occupation. 14. If an applicant is not the owner of the property wherera horne occupation IS to he conducted,then a signed statement from the owner approving srch use of the dwelling must be submitted with the appilcation. Ills 0 APPROVED Conditions: r Ftlnaitittnac �,};,5r,,. ��o•� i �r'r1,ur jxJi{?•,n.�'� '� �� _ ;tY VI.1 tttd4tAc113:=3Er�iflS� tdL:Yjwt7�ta —" ''f". —9 —---�- CITY OF R,ANCEO CUCAMONGA fSTAFF REPORT a S DATE: January 14, 1987 19 TO: Chairman and Member.' of the Planning Coamissioi FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Rubin Yu, Associaste Planner SUBJECT: HUNTE&S: RIDGE SEECIFICIPLAN - CITY OF FONTANA - Planning h ommi`ss °on reviewof Tanduse alternatives or the Hunters Ridst Specific Plan on 557.6 acres of land with the City;. of Fontana, located on the north a:de of Summit Avenue, east of San Sevaine Creek, west of Devore Freeway. I. ABSTRACT: The City of Fontana is in the process of'preparing,a Specific Plan for Hunters Ridge (Hunt Club Property) annexeJ• in 1985. The i consultant selected to prepare the document. the Planning Center, will present the 'latest three land use alternatives to the City 6 Council on January 21, 1907. Prior to this- date, the,Pia.onirg Commission is requested to review and comment on the project. The Commissi^n should focus their review of the alternatives on the impact of the project as they relate to Rancho Cucamonga. A copy f of Hunters Ridge Specific Plan Executive Summary is attached. I, IL BACKGROUND: A. Previous Review a This item was first referred to the Planning Commission by the City Council in October 1986. Three preliminary land use alternatives were reviewed by the Commission. following thu review, the Commission indicated none of the three alternatives was acceptable. At that time, the c City of Fontana stated that those preliminary alternatives would be completely revised after further research and analysis. After a delay requested by,, the City of Fontana, the; Planning Commission reviewed the second set of three alternatives on February 26, 1986. Again, the Commission stated that all three alternatives were unacceptable. Hwk a third set of the Hunters Ridge Specific Plan Land Use Alternatives, has been sulA#ted to the City of Rancho Cucamoilga for review. ITEM R' PI:AN I & f30F fL>SS'LOt REPA Hurterzs, R �Span Janu1'ry, 1r4, ►107: ` =k, 0 ., a. Pro,�►eCt:;Histo;ry The Hint s Ridge .property previrousty, refert14 to as Hunt Clubl was.pa*—; '1y i- the Rancho U.' onga Sphere of Influence s:ortii of Et prdoft. It Was Mhexed'to the Ci-,y of Fontana in 1"9$5 However, .the. Cityr of 'Rancho Cucnga has an opportunf ty to cent ate Spec 3fic Plan as prom. M in a: settl`eraent agreement with Fontana.- The agreement resusited� (Mtr-)itigation filed by, Y the Ci f upon,ieftoni,.Oy, WCOt reamoving the,property from the Rancha CaC-alf ga Sphere°rof Infl=ue:�ce and annexing it r, into the City off Fontana. ' The setts sen,t 'agreement between,, Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana estabTfshes tfimt: g 1. Rancho Cucamongat and Fontana acknowledge x that the owner,/6f'the ra70 &�,es in the C annexation area�.�has by a separate agreement wi`#- Rarsho, Cucaspnga agreoxif that. the 6rftat;on ,area' shall be ''. developed at a densl•V.cF ro more than an average of four units per gross acre. f.w 2.. Both the Cities of Fontana and; Rancho Cucamonga mutually �," to permit development at deasitie« no higher than . those establ ishe& by tie 'present West I Cbothill Com —,git>r Plan. 3. The City of Fontana shall require pa�,aent of school impact fees and any 4tha}``' fees which may be identiflo.di as jecessary f mitigation in the EIR or,Specii::,'Plan. 4. The two cities agree t�'o coopevate �in - encouraging a regionl par% west of the site in the area of the ;fan Sevaine Creek,: S. Three land use alternatives sha'► be presented.to the. City of Rancho Cucamonga ('ity Council and their dints -gill be . given "serious consideration by the City of Fontana. , 'f i ,l i { t �e Oat rat 1 e ae aet;yee ®ne Of Fo°tad r �a yeN %;"e.. a Sp yn9 ,'netiePst '- pep°r • jGAS* Fo1 1tetna a e�,d ,, le+p a se Cho Cja '1 ups �l prep WOO ;t �ncn°Ge�c plan spa °i'E. sae # WAN y�a11 erns,01 ete d ta�rr tNe cofc,61 a area atyr�ae- F �:°��ron+taent an�a ose - �` e 11O*s• is e �s cs Azed as $ Seep�~ab� {i►t a"ka yy pan�e fed ~ oc Soto e0 Zc,9 tee rep ,ate 3 11 e = ?jao� ptasen t��+"atAos p q� 3t`!o � 1-1{r�bl red3 a a1 i� Vii5 ea• alonggn�es erty p vNe.a un an prop . A• one ara11 as ter m § �1�s� � ue,�n9 �►� r�ra1 er1t �1 nt up s an1`J 0t *. S• twe ZOp iS ty . e -1'11te irc at {pC� aea sAe10,�1 be t to ` e a 15• a alien A? akpaS�' s 01 xca'Ced bud SPIN - plan• 8 be ' pr03��y ,ne y�iow toto viae�' alter tra oleea a p°4 ry F�sesfe'�ay ' �1re°te. o 'aa�• tbe�° °�leeyt • �$in coyty ci`°r,9 0j F Ne 5ou esn aye 1 �� c�%oiwO ctie G�t� �0ty 010 Jac ;tl aaeOQer y ;t oC 6t e tne 1 ernati'r��ect 5• ofGtAe�e�e' 77 ' ., obi P j. s 1 y ylllrr x � hr4ltr Tt RirtSq F+, rlr■MRpt� 7 '� �! �.31 r�trl■ nrlls i pal = r4.�wlirivrnrnrrb- rii _ t �, t; �� , tCry!T•MQn yd[abf°■l,r rr11MI� e{(+urrrausl ' � b sralrtpRrrrrr vr.:�rv.rulrlr t 9 � r rlrrrsll � e Y�i a uairrlR�rnarr ar 1 �=�' t 1nqq r1ryr■■ �'.'�QrrrrrirllrlArr rb! r ``�. � LuurQlrraRoul� ! 0 l PLfitHtt f&' ONO S510 S�TA�FF REPORT Hung ers iLi`dge ecifir plan January 14, 19871 Page 4 ' IV'. SITE LOCATION AN-D CONSTRAINTS Pr • �i The subject property Is a 567.6 acre north-south oriented parcel .i Uxated on the north side of sum-sit Avenue, elst of San Sevaine Creek, west of Devare Freeway. (See Exhfbit A) the property.P ty'• number o of physical constraints affect the development design of �,.. , A. The upper one-third of the 'property is a canyon in the 3` foothills. 8.. The lower tV,6_tiiJr,4s of the .property is. a maderataly sloped alluvial zr'dn. C. Sdn Sevaine, Creek and flood plain bounds the property, on the test. " D. TF` Hawker-Crawford flood control ch"dnnel traverses the: 7twer one-third of the property. ` Z. Two electric utility easements divide the proper"'y into thirds. F. The Cuca-Toilga fault parallels the upper utilittt easmnt and is, subject 0 the State of California Special Studies Zone which addresses seismic issues. S. the Sal 6rrnardino National Forest bounds the property in the north, k H. The 1-15 Freeway abutts the south-west corner of tjle property. V. AFFECTED LAM USE PLANSM3, PROGRAMS; In addition to the physical constraints, several local and county land use plans and/or progr7vas affect the development design of the 4 property. They are: e A. West Valley Foothills ':lac She San Bernardino Suunty West Valley Foothills Plan calls for the level of development in the West Valley Foothills area to be an extension of adjoining communities. New development should be compatible with the character of the adjacent or pities. r< f �� ;AJ 7` THIS PAGE LEFT.BLANK INTENTIONALL-i 46 ;@ a F . "Etwaoda.S. caCln The City of Ra ch6' Jucawn b�,aunds the propgz,ty on the south. 57hexE a 5pe� c plancalfs for very low densiItj���s2 rig lly�resddentfai u eW( # ellking°unfits per acre},wipt3�it t76ycsestrias0ep�1°ay,;Eli trict. C. West fall", Fothiills Etes•,trtan_Tra31 5ya;,ea+ 11The prof;ct sf�Cei o w�ittlti,I th area, r�es��"` ted for the We yetpy Faa�th�fills. qustrilan .7ri7 -Sys :which probides for ,ark jfitegrated,,; W a'l trawl r►e'trlork. The wes •}1ial:tey FQat�3 T CbW ty Pl'at shams two traisls _ crossinn the ropeP,ty., Ap'peopet site "'s also adjacent to the'-Uneho Cucamonga Equestrian Ov0iAy $one to the' crest. F ^+}, Foothill Hazard Protection Overlay District About the upper two thirds of the property 'is within thi County Foothill Hoards Protection OVerlriistriet which provides fire pratectian standards and regulations. Althot;igh it is anticipated' that the above physical constraints and ' land use plans M11 be address°ed in detail in the Environmental Impact Report, they also influence /lesign of the development, particularly the density. VI. Dt.tSCRIPTION AW MALYSIS OF LATEST Tv—,AE LAW USE ALTERNATIVES, 'fhe following paragraihs are a summary description and analysis of ~ I+rEhe turrent'land use alternatives. As used below, �ggross� density is 1a ratio of the total number_of dwelling units and the-tii tam-acres9 e of the site (567.6 acres), including x"`,4residential areas. ;,streets, utility easements, flood control other open space. �Average density is the ratfa of dwelling(iJiits to developed' res dent�reas nc uding stri,4#'s but excluding non-residential uses and open space. �a �r it N�h f� � ( � � `i ',dl�.,� ♦s��.. , •.ail �:. lt t'i •' 7 �a a/ EfihtA l()WOyC{{!6 LM4L Fafi�EST S t t'� t• { d a '' L t '� X>T { s as r t}�.. MUM Lar Tm Oar[iris.,�aes an t t t �f I�'` {,.. wwatasat caeca asms a swan sa ' ` ��Jr LfC N' .1aM till iJ 4a (:.1 tam 4l1[J IN a+.S.iJ tr tt 7+ r y Ste- Q sati+t as's°':taaw _aa.a«u..aaa -aa /. t �� I .,e. •�.?:�.t'sti�SL}.l ni'aJ Fr1,A&w 1e Let tx ..* ,,+1 sN P as< t [ .t t .y., i � , ���• t ( [.�aL car man..tsa a.a r tro awe { /ifrsaY'. .0 tote. taeux s cell n.et any j r R r4LQ+l. (• "tam r n«a c area[tat s ` `r e� .y to taelr� dl e c SAN SEVARX WASH.74. .w.i-tR"� t�.�.Ytaatese � t•1. .. �faa.�t'ret� wn ': .� �.: � + {""i'•s a at •^.. tJavr.as.. N.. tswta .set ton aattanws It Il ta? rNl r t Lt Y GWMTf MILMM topr(ASIN AT i1olml 4' CITY 0I ITEM-,M, HUNTERS ?•URGE SPECIFIC, 3 RANCHO CUCXM0NGA TITLE'% PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: 13 SCALE-: F�RI CsOy a 1 REPORT Hunrrers°RigeiSpWAc Rian January4; @7 tl Page b A. Aliter_nati-re One Me ExhibIt pl ne�C t-r` Al�ternatfve One calls. for creation: of three ioods fr,*,north to south separated; by utility, easements. x6 'gener:al, this a11t-er4aik ,ve: fs-based: om the concept,o graduib'om of density firm`the iott I fAtense In the, nosteix orlrs",ttiiOd of the ia'Fopera (coaarer'ci'all, ,00ti,- famizlW and s*OTT lot e�t'n4','h h l2, to the l easti i tensr.= (estate liots and open space&) in the upper, one-third of the property. This al ternative proposes 2,17o`J units Orr 436 acres w rtk an: aueragq�- density, of about—S.Q..unfts per acre. The gross den�'r�Oy is about 3.8f units.'pier acre. rt has the, second east, dwilling, unit~ and the highest percentage of siti,faly� d !Zl"ingunits (34,7t) among the three alier.-natives Circulation. Access would he 3i'rotted toy=one primary ens ry v ra° er ry Avenue and a scAtondary access on ^uncap Canyr}l Road at the southeast cgr<nor of thK Site. Ykiis is the J tly_ afternative witch cal Is for "of, the Haw;er-Craw;ord+' flood contro,'h channel to the eastern i !I�boundary of the property. Concerns: The major disa6antage of this alternative re a es � o lands use tranOion and circulation.. The, k ' c aercia! use, aparb�ents• and tmkhouses at the south- west corner, of the site along, the Suagit Avenue and San % ,; Sevaine gash would be, incompatible with half-acre lots south of Suit Avenue.; Also,, it would create land use transition problems to-the possible open space amenity along San Sevaine Creak. According to the. City Traffic Engineer, the circulaV on plan is inadequate because only one major exit is pro/ided via Cherry Avenue. This plan would funnel almost (ll the project traffic into Rancho Cucamonga. According to the Foothills Hazard Protection Overlay District requirement for two major access points, the circulation is inadequate for fire protectioa because it allows no throu9K traffic. f W a s, �." •as 1 "�'7 S 'BERNARDINO t—WI 4iAt FOREST .4 I r Yca �.a •4` T•"fir �. t muma.Wt TYPO r• teas! arosa r .� � � Y .•;<� , , _'�" �..a.., ..�tel:. `• t a ✓,,,. i •"a S � '"t n d s .� r��ar wr r• nt!raai ro as.F u.. f:C � afYY�r � C a,sor ffY.fw/1 lf.0 aJ 1 LY aaA.� {Ya3ac r. ryr tr,.A"T �.Afca_•.Y - J, f bfu '�• r •a .,� t q • Q at Litt ff.tt4 rYtso t. ••T afa:a i• � t f'`• 0 u ur j�* a.r u r•a •u.r ar.f ' tj{ .y, / Y,r Ps•Mw. ��`�,.• ��e^' i aT 7 iw }•� a'• � s .� ,yy, ' I.,..©ca u, f aR�xaaiaa- Y a{Yk rf�1 t I •.�` ;. ,� `� o rtlT.0lYtAt lTeQ _f • 1 Q ea lqa Yur rarTa a a a �.a rr! k "T., tat.Y l f.• � ^ (�,• • _�•e' ratlr.TLL aIYYN' If 91r. . ,a. w Yw.eo..ww`t 7Saa0 pq 9tnr Y M 7 lam 4F\ maw ati.akfoe r r,k ^���•+�� � •1.� o.pfY6a• et 1�.. ni li tfeYa•+;i,8 - a 9APJ.y„vANSL W-0at �• i �.: a uma.ceoa 1N wTf h .�N"�BA95f? to t •j�Y •Y �. • �" Oh 14fI aH40bT •IIC RX , ea as 736oyAn 4 .� • xaw�ara rat. •o:, A a taanon p Y:::a" j ia�aFu. 6C /w aoTa SLWM n �.(ETEtjTION 9ASN i`•1 a a,� UJU Y OF ITEM: HUNTERS, titOQE SPECIFIC (LA RANCHO CUCAMON.GA TITLE; PLANNING ING DIVISION EXHIBIT: SCALE: � inAter �p d ec i . Pi!an aRT .- " page �'► Alte:rggve TWkS � Col tz m'tet'tits re'7w9 i!s based tsn; the a unity Core, c`anc Ti»z,itt� used; cop rasdR esleltoses a sctoal, 'two parks, trnmhousess dtme> !u� t;!Vtg detadfi4 h6fts;. The _ co�aercfill sib iE lopasted at the f.itrstaior. ifnternazlt j intersection.adalle tir parklcoijWni^ty.center. ' Dens: : This- e,�nati!ye� cal!Ts for R,121 unfits.,on; 426i acres: ttVIk av iato-,densi.ky of about, �,9& units per, acre. They gross Q;0'I4tY• is about 1.74 unfits• per, acre. It has tFre 46we� Ilwingr unfits, _and= second highest percentage of eulx4 faik y' dwellzing, units {,29AS}'_anmong, the three alfternatiw ,praod. "� C3rcul�stixt: Three poin�:� ,uf ac:,ess are proposed with aft e ma>ar: 9rough acre, v to Cherry Avenue;qn the south, through to G'ayote Canyon Road` onf the 'east of the property.. A secondar�p,azccessr. is on Quncan Canyon Road to the southeast,pa►rtIom of toe property. According to`'the City TraOi1c,:.hg9ir"r, this alternative has. the best internal circdl;Ewa ,, plan among, the,three a?ternatives. r, Concerns The major c&cern:of thi'j'a ternativi is land use and &n5rty transiitif on problems. The comwrctal use, , townhruses and; apartments in the southern one-third of the property, aouth of the Edison utility easevsert, as. +�rolT as small 6,,000 square foot , lots, would be 3neoppatible witch, half-acre Lots south of Summit. The apartments along the T-15 Freeway would create an undesirable image for the rural;; haracter of the area. F This alternative vould set 'a=`6 edent far future land use and adversely affect the rural living environment of the area. r z I -.11 Ia, � +i-i a'•`. + ,LGlttlaNR '. �v. '. .�t � � t' ♦' �. i� .� �a, xaa IJ sk! u�tswwaawo elATratur. Koaesr s ,^ = 7 t t•+ g vow�x r 7 '•l .•} J e i I t l awn twin wr awfe.sie Ufa y a I,a• ua�.� � •t ♦ t � 7 1.,+ vJas rutat .ew+tu.� a•v. sa.♦ a •.f a .t r i ,a M _Iit�t1, '++ •:Q.+br re� Is.+ a of I x• ♦,.,. •� { f`„-.•. w +,G"a At:�xJ �:.Q el aar ��u.erI-x�t as xu•1a1 e1 at P g a R•, ♦.I ram/ � ♦ r 1 .�.. Q Nt ter F'es:r ri.l li, j J 1.+ } Vti+tw.{r< ` Sla�� �,...rT 'yam ry ^�• Q. sf aaa ��v'.iw.t If .a)_.f.� rf • I. •= •, .. ffy..._.^^srt'11+� f «,�s•.� •fV WIIIlIM�If +�-�{� -�.. �• +' R eeri �.e' ��''J..\`� M C p�i '3 i•'�A tt ttT x t 1 t'�f 1 I9 s 1 f+i 1 1it• f i k . �1 �T.I� .w� �fMYMt rM 111IIhN�C}�M11' ♦ r�• LJ s l .;� r .� � ��.*^ t`.► ► Q a w: elf.'(T..+ s ,roe..9k+a 1as. � r�ti� f t.. .n;.�S� � 1. :�.-^ � - t «. .L �.._ �t.,:.:r�wN+fiRtNl �f,ff« 1•ia `• ,,. •�.. �° ?� :°I'3'3e""` +►"tom. a i 1 ' as�itlleR ae! c07•a ytf•.M r I t 414[r - ` . .> r M fled ► j1er.,•. T, wt t1eY Ceeinl +i 1' h a .Ii�l ttir� rum ; • �a t sa ry� �• _ it uarrJ .. h y J M Mlc'9lQ rifGlMf r ` erSAao 1 .'.! MtIOTf • 1J XM Mb� t L i ` u of •�utara � Inkm IL $ ..• „L race i ♦b1� iy }sic x+.r+eJ �Q i •�N'tefw If+e� t? + t�lyr r`'•fir.t; iY>iti'f7 wvzmxt f •q MASW NORTH • E�i.��p�. ��t1�L'�tJ L����� CITY OF ITEM HUNTERS RlDC2 SPkCIFIC PLR RANCITRIO' �UCAMO1V G'.� TITLE: PLANNING DIVISION I' IIII3IT:, "DSCALE: t un �, n page $ J C. Altern400 Mr4, (see totbot D) k .. ry fiMW to kike� filrternative. On% MUrnative ��tree s,Is� ca s cr crdat on Of` rft ;n fShbk hoods a+.paratad by utfl#rty tas nts. The schv'opark: Site #+, located at the center of the, griddle ae_thiTd of ,she prokrt i Unlike the 'outer , Alternative Thr0S proposes no aAlUrna ive Three pro pplkQs 2,932 1tn1tS 6n"429 acres d$ abru�e Sad' units per � aora. The Or Ws densetar s ohout � un#;ts per acre It has the st d�vel ?tg. u�ats and` highest ,i�ensfty among the yee:e7ternati,ves it his the lowest ercentag 'of txtlti"-� 1y units s. G� Crc�stat*._ The circt�lIaton pr�tta�rn of Alternative d&l� r, "s��s� Tar to;ftt Ofe�nat�ivk� '��aa it proposes three points of;access in the,oaf. antas as Alternative Two. According to the CiW Tratf�tc Engineer, the proposed , loop roa4 would cause internal circulation ? Concerns: The, disadyant>cge of this alternative #s the ovara ensi# The" Overall density is high given the rural character of the urea. Like Alternative Two, the intensity of apartments and =all lot units along the I- ' 16 Freeway would establish an undesirable image and precedent for fdtur-Q,J-eelaprr*nt On surrounding property. The positive alert under this alternative is that no coftercial site!is proposed. PLANNTNGrS �9ISSItI. STi4FF REPORT �"'� Hunters Rtdge S00 fric Plan �_ January M Page 9 VII. SUMARY OF FINDINGS AND COKERNS FOR. LATEST THREE,11A USE A. Na Qualitative Difference The three, aiternativ* are not qualitatively different from each 'otheer. They are all similar in land use patterns and density. 1. Land IJA Patterns In general, the Tana use patterns of all three alternatives are based ott the concept of decrease of density frost south to nortK The ` property is di+41ded into three segeats or neighborhoods separated�by utility i14Vments The land use pattern for the northeri on''-- rd of , the Oree alternatives are identfcal, Sctaol and'-park sites and.low density Pots are found in ,the middle one-third in all three aiternati4is. The southern one-third includes a commercial site in Altarnativ4s � and Two. Apartoents, townhouses :and" small' lot single- family horses are located along SumWt Avenue .and the I-16 Freeway in all three of the alternatives.Density' = In -density and unit count, the three alternatives- are almost idrnticat. 'The gross density ranges from 3.74 to 3.93 units per acre. The unit count ranges from 2,121 to 2,23C, 3. Circulatic 'Concept Phan As to circulation concept plan, Alternatives TA and Three are very similar. Both. alternatives propose three points of access with a major arterial going through the 'project site.: All three alternatives call' for a primary project entry off Summit Avenue. (For \ 'I additional circulation conceens,, see Section VIII, following.) t fT_ ,r Pi;tW8,44 C 1 lIS5IOW STAFF DEPORT Hunters,Udge Spectifft Flan January 14, 1.987 Page 10 S. Comparison to Alternatives Previously Reviewed The current three alternatives are very similar to the previous ones. reviewed by the Planning Comoission except that the density has increased as follows. October 1985 1705 - 214, dwelling units February 1986 1930 —2076,dwe�ling un#;ts Current 2121 2232 Awallinq units In spite of previous commerts by the Tito lrnq Coax ,ssion that the density is too high given, site constraints and the rural character of the area, the propgsa densit4k_of the current alternatives has increased.:- C. Level and Character of Dlevelopmot k gone of the three alternatives is cons#stent wittt the land use directive of the Vest Valley K;4hill Plan. For example„ the plan calls for a level of development that �. is an extension of adjofOig comounities and.also directs new development to be compatible with the character of adjacent comnitles._ The three land use alternatives submitted do not reflect these land use gwIdel:'ines. k Vill. CIRCULATL 1COHCERMS Although circulation issues will be addressed in detail at the Environmental i` view phase, circulation also affects project design and densities at the alternative selection stagc. A traffic study prepared by Willdan Associates indicates that 76% to of the project traffic w0l travel south on Charr,/ Avenue, through Rancho Cucamonga. Although future access to the 1-15 Freeway is planned at the Coyote: Canyon/Duncan toyon Road intersection, Cherry Avenue is the only access to the freeway now. Although according to plans, Stmedt Avenuet24th Street will be {approved to arterial status in the fuUre Highland avenue is the nearest cast-west travel route at this time. Therefore, it is likely that most of the project traffic will use the Cherry Avenue =tz, necessitating off-site improvements for Cherry Avenue in conjunction with development of the hunters Ridge project. This and ether concerns are sumarized below- A. According to the preliminary traffic study for the { project, Cherry Avenue will need, to be improved, at a minimum, to secondary arterial standards: betwe�o the reeccom dsCh y to bu upgraded t ` Traffic arteriileer rF7 PLattNlH� CS'S QtTAp RENORT '} twnter s Ridge eci�fiic,xlan January 14, 106 Page 11, R, z- d� B. Additional off-site improv n" rill be;,necessary on Suroit Avenue and Duncan' Canyotr Road free,;'the western boundary, of ta.e project; to=:tiie " `;�-,ure freeway intersection easy of the provec'rsi-te.' t; � i t C, Construction of off-sate street fmpioVements in Rancho Cucsr onga, ,,dtf ectly related t� the Huaers Ridge project, is, a primary concern and should be a part of ' the project. j4r D. Circulatinn -issues need tu,,"be studied In. conjunction with nearby projects;, partYcgLarly the potential dAvelrbpmemt immediately crest of San Sevatne wash. E. The West Valley Foothfl, Cr=hi,tiea� Plan -callsi for an east-west ccllector' ,,sad aligned 'with Coyote Canyon Road and the planned Duman Canyon access to I-16. TiFis shou;4 be-revi;ewad and valuated in relation to the project. , Fhe specific place',�s failed to address this,issue. F. Internal strut desijr) crit€ris used by the Hunters Ridge project is inadequate,;;- Specifically, thG trzvel lanes for major arterial roads J24 feet pavement,;each k way) and coll;ecto`roads (24 feet pavr. nt, `wa-gays• curb to curb) ar ' narrow' and inadequate for the Projected traffic according to our city Traffic Engineer. IX. DRAINAGE CONCERNS Engineering staff'has reviewed�the a7t rnattyes and concluded'that. , the project is proposinck a drainage�conceot which is more or less similar for all 'the three alternatives_ ibe proposal will impact mostly the ;ragi onai drainage system. As such,., County Flood Control District should thoroughly,evaluate the �5 a part or San-Sevai'ne - EtiWanda Channel improvement plan prepared by the County, ar debris dare is proposed at the tvruth of San Seyaine canyon which.may have some impact on the grsrtherly area of the project. The—Tity of Fontana and/or the developer should work with the Flood Control District to address this issue. 1 PLAN Ct I, �r A F!'RWRT gsi- e Rid Spi;fi��l:an da N r,F Page X2 r is Ran chnI Cucamonga is concerned 'about ;the treatment of- Hawker- Crawford Channel- which. is,proposed to tie kept-in a,natural ta^te for Alternati0es 'iwo and` Three and a nes realigftd, unimproved channel, f®r:AJte,rnatiJ, 0e In all instances.: it will, -hive an i impact 0 th'i drae�stream.reach of the channel which ;traverses-the city area, due � erosion%cf th ;channel bottvii and the,resulting debris depos�'U6. Future, i�Wrm_gent of this doamstrear teach will'thus be adv �s�e�ls_c�ffected: ' Staf fr.suggests thA tvhe channel be concrete lined t#cro6gh to the pro ec `Eioundary. r X. PROPOSES USPONSE M-,TM CM OF,FONTANA Staff has prepared:,the foTlcming', response to the Ci�;� of Fontana concerning the lend use .alternatives for the k►nters Ridgy Specific Plan: A. None of the thr .;land'usa;alternatives is acceptable, O. The alternatives 47a not, "qualitatively differene and; therefore do not fledt Ue intent of the agreement between the'two Iolties> G. None of the'three alternatives is consistent with the land use directives of the hest Malley -;Foothills Plan. For example; U)e Ian calls for a' Aevel of development that ' is an extension of adjoining; comunities and also directs new development to be;, compatible with the character of adjacent, commniities. < The three lr."d use Alternatives submitted do nit reflect these land use guidelines* D. Uprovement eoita direcOy related to the project, but within Rancho +aucamonna, ,mast 'be provided by the developer, and/or the C:.+ of Fontana.> Major items' include: Improvetimnt of,,,Cherry Avenue tws,a` major arterial between thp- priJect entrance and I-16, Improvement of Suwatt Avenue avid Duncan Canyon. Road from the western bouniiary of the-,project 5ite to the future freeway intersection east of the site, and flood control improvements at Summit Avenge and to the south` resulting. from realignment of the Hawker-Crawford Channel. E. In addition to the above issues, the City of Fontana should consider and respond to the City"s specific 1� concerns over the%lateit alternatives of the proposed Specific Plan. Pi Aii O REPORT51 , : 4iurt ers�[ die e fic NY Page 13 W11 or comer,. re+fardim O latest..al"iergatives are as " ,1. T' as+erail density o eaclr , lEarindt to is high g! en skiff coRstra4n and rural r tt# acte of a area ''spite w, oerP F previo rs cammer�ts Art ih� adrrrse� iciix e¢ the deveTapmon nsi.� art tlye ad�1?ei'riing property,a w 2 .",The, intensity of apartments tinbousesfi e c s is i devalopaneiit (_in Al ec ratWes Qtte �$ed T � ndstrtlrl op iot:hs in tharn bhe this ��f" Ile property. wattid''.not be compatihle wi9:ii°fir ha faa Ne a$s, i0hih of the project sib. in i ancha Wpawnja.. It would allsq estbhltsh an Oddslrat+jt image, and precedent 1F+Sr' future +y�ele�g :t a tk, surrounftj ptopertim � { 3, rEstaft° -lots, parka" a.a school and 1ow . t, density singla4amily l�,ots are-preferable in;' the southern one-tmwd of" i s prgpa rty t x provide,"a ;�ett�r land, ;use' and' 'detgsity traositi� to thi hail acl°e io$s south of Surmit Milue in Rancho Cuc'bwilga. 4. The,,-:Specific Plan zhould be consiistent'wftb the :A�tity and:.-local plans and programs for the area, such as the Westtiaileyv Foothill comnities PVC n, Etiaanda 'S"Of'io Planr West 4a111ey Foothills Comnity, Plan Equestr m Trail Systpm,,and Foothill Hazard Protective Ovarlay;Di'strict. S. Proposed,,:"rest; 'pndards for Wv internal arterial and co11'ector roads tre'-,nadequate and. they shosi d,, ba up, to the design standards wrhish s4.W' adequately handle the projected traffic fur the area, 6. Cherry Avenue should be upgrades! -to Major arterial standards between the project - entrance and -15. 71, ,•, Bunters s Sxi 3,41, Mott; l January 14<, page 14. r] a T. Summit ano tAancan CanY-hn Road.ShoId- be upgrro to 4r t �a �tp» iStHsn r of ,� Frojeft� to th*"9future fr"oway fnteoset tron fast; of the P-MrJect site.- R study"for' the 0pro4e at of se roads should tse df de ava.,"AN`e to t N. Ci#,y Of R4ntfib' Guicar 3A19a for r"Ierra (�,4 8. the spear,fOft V�Ji4n shoal d i-view and evai ia:te as the Mast Ifal'YeyH Fa,thi'11 Getn3ti; S Plan prGpoSt i c3tx' ! care":- 5t' c73 E Eft?° �Ct�td' k alignedt " oye Canyon Road and'isttte planned, Ap,;an, cat oe access »ia, lrr relatt "to the prlojct, 9. Circulation issues generated by the pro3i*Et F xhotild be studie+:Pin conjunctton Stith. nearby projects, particularly, . 'they Dilorto I development immediately west of San:,sesvaipe 10. The City ofc:,,onUr&,sft(JuldI coordinate with, the County to derelop+`A master circulation` plan for the area. The proSKt should b related to the master plan, ; 11. The County Flood Control :A3stris't should thoroughly evaluate ire �rapo5z�l and V- Hawker-Crawford Chapnel should be concrs tey lined to the project boundary. 124 The, project design should consider site constraints and limitations presented by natural hazards ouch as slope stability, flooding, seismic coadit.ons,, wind turbulence, and wild land fi,ye. 19. Presentation and sensitivity to existing natural features, land forces, and historic features on the site should be considered, particularly in regard to grading and preservation of mature vegetation such as. Eucalyptus trees. 14. Egjestrian trails should be located adjacent to San Seva:ine wash connecting Suit,avenue to the northern utility corridor, " p - `r' ;� _ erg• ,.w, POT Hunts rig p i'r }Plan Jarival� Page�'I8 '3 ' 18, i n�tenar ce r Y s flits post he prowfded for. 7iar�dscap any rails alossg thA PerSPIier P a of_ �pro$eti>i, 6a'U col ar'3 ark �i, t Avenue- 7' F, Eta �i s or 1`t�'beg in an a tpar� pity i `}rrevf& and ��pac� .REAr` fart �h� t �� l2,�dt�e 5pegi,fii� P+13hr ,ir� accardain��er "w�i',ti tile' . �.annexat��sn} se���ement dgreea�ent' D�.�w�'n ,Rarich6' _ Cucaa►a�ga and°�'on•�. ' XI. R�Cttn�98+�iA�fl�Mf` '�� The PlaenYng,Ca ws?on sh6d(i reWiea tire`-proposed altern&6Vis">4s they rebate tQ.-the,`•fty of, Rancha Cud'vd0ga, It 3s tedcemended that the Planning Coaasflss on adopt the prop-6 ed response aid;reg�4r itto the City Coned •,isy Vafriute actfon for Oefr '01 zanuar'y Z1. _ 1987. Res ully $L tteet '. ul er City, Pi nner t3:RY-.te r Attachments: Hunters Ridge Specific: Plan Executive Summary,. ' yt fD <q3 ./:� ,�-+ )�� % � ■ ! � `•..•ate tea. + \ .'A� f�AN'Q� ■ `. ��Bay 14 r �' « ' 13•name .welt ■ vlieki ts. ROAD -� S •�.! _C. r7 4 ` oo®RIDGE LU2.1 �^ 2 `—" a 23 m91®®ile . ...........Z4.,.sa....... a=,. 10 .. SUMMtT V _ AVE .t..ter ---- � ,I eservorr 13 Cc I AL ERE� Rtpu m .. OP Well eK - • f `i131' Nr6NLAN0 /A +•,,.w. j., w EXE r, -aE�_GILFILLAN •} i`. iq �177e r CITY C6"��G�IIr�3'A" HU87-S'R4''AIDGE' S ,9CIJftC PLANT r^ �� 0 �r F.�2dF71-,UT;,V S F x October 27, 1985 i� THE PLANNING CENTER 240 Newport Center Drive Suite 215 Newport Beach, CA 92660 c i,~F EXECUTIVE SUMMAR.Y C TABLE OF CC14TENTS '} Z INTRODUCTION 1 h II, PROrIECT SEprl 2 -wr•, \ OWNERSHIP 2 IV., BACKGROUND' u 2% �. EXISTINa.,GJ7NDITTONS Exhibit;- Regional !t 3 VI: KEY Issuss y Vill COMMON CH&PACTURIS.-TI.CS OF TEE kLiTERNATIVES E t Ai� Rbads= Exhibit.: Pr3im y Project Entry 7 Exhibit: Elevation afPriauary. Project Er try ti Exhibit. HlAj,or A ,.rtersia 'RoadJ,6£v-id-_d Exhibit. cherry Avenue Plan/Li.neal. Peij*k4ay I' Exhibit:- sherry Avenue PTan/Cul-d°s Sai�', _ Accecs-. to. Partway 31 Erhibi,t 'Collector Road 12. Ekhibiit , Local' Road , S. Community-Structure and Facilities Exhibiii �Comaunity Faf.il.ities Plan Exhibit: Equestrian Facility and ; - Interpreti3re Park "J' , a Part: Requirements l6 C. Flood" Control Exhibit: hawker Crawford.-.Channel: ;section 17 k' Exhibit: San Sevaine 1rdash Edge TZ`eatreent/ Equestrian Easement j8 4 � VIII. ALTERNATIVE SITE UTILIIZ$LcIaN CaNCr;P3S 19 A. Alternative 1 19 Exhibit 21 B. Alternative, 2 -2�` Exhibit 27 C. Alternative 3 25 Exhibit 27 IX.. EVALUATION CF AL7.'ERNA"DIVES 28 y .,. . F ''�� 1•w*' �+aLR��Qixp��s�� t C `' IiI ( t i ., 5 ��.r'" I a' ZIG6C41l iV tl ,��mID ` 8 3tyT T! DYl I S'a 4S dts$1�5,, y 11 �`at a Plan-na ng C-'a 0. �TwWof nu a ' *4 to s�lec dui ea:off, a F � f fi � ; the three car er yts �sccsr , aak,t�her � 570-tea^re H�intc � dc}"cSpe �` �„c, t� y,�3r:�e�-;�u Vie° a�a .rnLendd ai � ', ';��� sty fceNs, M review hg',th ., i o�` tie of a ' Offi:cials« Erac con�cep�t d � � nd 6' airciaEat�t�n �tzeasY project aiiey �f�ae�haz� an1i of dewelopme tk �� e _h� natives wildaa:pes� ad at � +ee`` ` k;a City orE Rancho` ,tui;�am`o gito,;;aNa3a� tions. .and two tt'dc i�i►�v o' r�ia a� w thY - 4 f4Fle W i t1 t h�� °3 rik41p1n lAA[r2�° I4�� Cti Z1 j S B 0 c 1 selecting R "prof red' a� narr��vje� , t�s ienc � to the Preferred tie �s�a3tsv a to{#1a:lr Gityounc�r oP.banr comments. :'The selection o£ a s" re�erEd a1! e ��a, "t ie and P Pa-4t1on . ;T of a_ final� w�i2tsp�reaozj+ vc��a tepr_00 fit" he �uEimin�a�t�io�r;"o� „. the first phase o ar stab-phase panxpg {ef�r+r £or project. The Phase-,A alternat as - re ul ed_ PM) t r evaluation of t�irtc att tiewtlr rgeeratredk aQa� eriats Ti1 ' effort is suppa ^-ed� b1t mite prodctas.. dev�eklraped'i ur iai the do tasks of this phase , Tkey, are.. Task One. Wank Program ` .Task Two =_ Rese-arcti Ae��srt w � Task Three: &ynthest .s Rep«rt Task,tFoure EXecutkTa .S x mArt Final Report The second phase will; focus an this prerferrad alternative for further analysis and will include the preparaition of a comprehensive specific plan and design guidelines, an ;t intejrated environmental impact repart (EXR), and a refined market 'study and fiscal impact report.. I F , t i II. PRW1ECT- OeAN ON, The Hunters R+tdge s is located; three miles Vast of Lytle Creek at 'whea bass 0 �the: lower slapes of thew San' Gabriel Mountains in t11e norttz. ern corner cvt the Ci t�g af' Fontana.• Summit Awenuw a idil U,. 5. Interstate ftghW&y; 15 (Devore, Free- way) form the southeraw:property boundary* ands San Sevasne Creek ruins al:;oYncl? t.he• we an: hovind,at�y_ To the• east. the property, ady.61ns cull. ��rl t3iirl;ds and tae Rich Pasha, a+rd ;•; to the north: the p ups^-ty me tves� S*ith thia S3tt--, Ber &rddno a National For, its Is. cWjacent r ta, othe ,•regtonab. jurisdicti;=ons incl,.ud n5, tlie" City",off Rancho Cucamonga to tha south and' `h, C-atif t ;09-1 San? 9,1rhandrina to the wast.. The y. proposed: Footh %Ll N`reeway vil.L lie so.aih .o;E the property adjacent to Hlghftan6 A enue-.. It.s xelaAAonshi,p• to the region. is depicted an the, Regional Lacatio f'mbibist.« '? III. OWNERSHIP' .; First. City Properties.owns the property (5'70 acres). IQ.. BACKGROUND The project site (also hm,owm as Annexation hired No.. 114) in, accordance withL , Local Agency Formation. Commission (LAFCO) settlement ag;raement between the City. of Fontan'a, anti' the City of Rancho Cucamonga, was annexed` into the City of Fontana in 158,5. As: part of the set:tl.e..sment. agreement the residential dwelling yield for the prgVert.X was established at a density of"no mane than ,��y� � tita ' The maximum t2wsll ing; unit t' count was.ca�L as €oljCows: 570 acres x 4 d.u.lz+c. _ yield To achieve this a General Plan Amendment le req red. ° AS a condition of this agreement the City of Fontana agreed to prepare a Specific. Plan and EIR for this property. V. ERISTINGf-;CONDITIONS The property is vacant with the exc"motion of the old Hunts:, Club and one homesite located just n� �h of the easement to Southern, California Edis, Company i transmission lines. Significant features Of -Iiii4 site ililude the San Shaine Canyon and Creek; Hullack Canyon and Creek; and the ruins of the old San Sevaine house, winery and, watering pond. An expanse: of the San Gabriel Mountains alluvial fan is quite distinct topographically, while the Alquist-Priolo Specific Stuo�;es Zone ,passes through the upper portion of the site along the Cucamonga_rault. 2 I91ti� at r-r a � y � «� �pmaoeni �':: �_ _ �' aann ar '� as■mvnnr ,� s�- agaaq aat, �t .^rt-,sr. a^' -•ta aagvaoc-=... ��- �•,. y � f�',�,�fiZgjagnanbqnt'J Sr d,M1ne anngaagv - r.�LaO aaavnvv' <" a -� � tsamq gmaaam.' ��acoaonvmptla y 'man,agbamaaa `� :9 ns7qm,■�ntlagbantl pYYaanppgmnn�aa y� Jangmnaaaan■■. f� Anaapa5lgn@nucnmlgaa� `'f �� rnla0 J} W _� �an�m�����ai�a■nabLp00p�� aaanC ■ amAnaaa[r�" # aagaatlli�IDnaomrrr - ,_u�. _ �, f h. i' fv � r.�d� ..� /�+ F '� —,t—, .� ...�.�. .-ram�.� — •—... a � a y �'.' ^�. L. �, i I m�oq� n# x -_tamaarr xommgm �+3xxmnga. +�leamq F� F ��,Ci/e� �� � � Vs� mmm0 .;aM w]l'lmm� l 1 f Vi} REY Issift ' sseVeral. key issues have been identified belozo, A3 important considerations in the ,Planning arAd design of po bite. Al:l of these issueg, have been evk2lua;ted in a pralrntinary mrrzte',r by the consul_taht: te,M More Beta lied' an;alyl[is ''till cctu;r for the selected ""preferred altornaUvesa during, the i^hasr 01 Two process as ,market and fiscal are refined, design ?. guidelines are developed.- and an EIR is p arl. J, Flood: Control. Thug Halwke. I� ;y r Cr'�aw�or�( Chaj}nel traverses the site on the east„from nc~ .th tg eknuat�* and the San ,. 4 sevainee Creeei ands its teuee; arde_r`the:,�' Operty to the Vest zeta. ordra;irtac�ss fz: ;,the It ountaii►. MOMMAMMate present]y bet levaluq* ad in a reg Tonal study ' .ill Vann atxi Ascises any will"be ' incorpazated as part of this specs fzc Isla r. !i h: 2. �TTtxlity EaSaments - Two major'electric{tl transmission,.: SInese operated 'blr SCE and the Veptti,tmej�t of Water:%and Power traverse the site. Their, telationshipr to development is addressed i.rr, the a lternatiV es. 3. Historic 6ltes - The ruins of the, Sala S�Ataine houso and ,,-) winery, and houses built in 1918 exista,on the property today. A cultural and rraleontol.ogic#1 +resr�urae survey has been undertaken to evaluate thesS site$ and they have been addressed irL the aXternati,,¢es,� 4. ' Equestrian F4cility - A regional oquest i„n,rliiking trail is identified in th �i+iest vr�3iley F'oo�;hills Community Plan err, the waste-- boundary of Chree .pra:jc�tt. rn actliitiec4, an equse3trian facility o:t tale property to service this trail: is addressed in. the altovh'atives. S. Estate Lots The location, size and nua-b4ot P large r f rgei residential estate Jets overlooking trie ciey has been addressed in the 'alternatives. 6., Market -r Petgional and local market strands haves been, . `evaluated: to insure that the land use mix and market crientation of the plan 1s supportable. Since Runters Ridge is outside the kte:deveiopmont Area a totally documented market study was not reguireid. Upon Planning Commission's selection of a pre}erred alternative the market report will be refined along with a final fiscal impact report.. 7. Seismic Faults - The Cucamonga fault zone passes through the upper portion of the property. The faults are primarily in the Utility Gars'Mthts and residential uses are setback from this .area in all alternatives:. I -� `, "• Th'ex rei+mclary ta£°€in tmpaces> oa£ thepro7ecr ^� one C�Pi A be amdF, D +corer •{6 1�5 reewZip jita ie�6ee�.1 asse�i �. ' a les�}:a� ivy * u e cra#1 s r F 1:lw ps ussdA lc�gn • r fm in r�^• vn�a*ltr'ua„tra ew44 ft; w RTwwzed± ae?E; nedC U' jp3rf S S t3E G'3 �317i°r7t00535. 1 [T P eY $r 1 th�e pre+ exr e�rn « �' In addb on Dat y It7�B;1 C.l IYai ""`n' �8tiOne c. n �?�: ��an o he -o ��i�tadS C: , �` ?��ro;, x4� to dos,wh'S�r hrese tenwa�ti "dt�o �n�t r�neept,�'�t�a,� ,�ae�apre�e�ed'c;toa �� a13."starz�3� vr� c�ai��sw`;. irat C�iSmAtititll ty y �El n �tiYl:anaEF �l�arac r 11. Land tl Tlkeh, t.Xq�e o•r .Iands Vsers4,, th'ei-. T4rsc ait:.xartt. re•i ati�Onsikv and irrttins ty are, addreasedh m the tree altsrc�a�ti�r$ coneepts�c _ Q r, 1 VrI- COMMON CI£ARACTERISTIC^a C3F THE.ALTERNATIVES j All three aitornatives have certain common land use and design 17haracf-� ristics. These common characteristik-s/as- sumpticr<s are present to some degree in all alternatives and main be'fdescri�ed as: A. RQ""S (Sgte Exhibit.sy� /�.. or( Zrimary project entry off Summit Avenue o Majc*- .. zial road,,divided. 110' Ai.O.W. o Collect ,j Stroot: 64� R.-O.W. i o Local Sµreet 60' R.o.W . D. COMMUNITY FACILITIES (See krh,�bits o An "Equestrian Facility and Interpretativel'Park" to link together the fallowing elements (See EO Oit) 1. An equestrian facility (corrals, horse ',railer parkin,", group pi,-nic area and' rest.00mo „ 2. The 'rifstoric --' 6 5evaine house, wfndry and �! resesti vir 3. The 1518 house (relocatee'i ab,,we upper easa�aen'L)' Y 4. An xrcefpretative trail tour connecting the San Y Sev i\ne house., wiviery and xeservoir-- o -t.i�,i upper . A house intefpretive displays/exhibits and the / equestrian facility. S. An equestrian/hiking trtail linkage to the' regional trail o A lineal parkway withits' the- major arterial_, right of way/scenic treatment o Scenic open space to the north (39.4 ac.. ,over 20% slope o 20' landscape setback along Summit Avenue o 30 landscape setback along Devore Freeway of One elementary school (10 acres) C. FLOOD CONTROL #See Exhibits) o Westerly levee and San Sevai�te Wash Edge Treatment (location to be deterfrined by'Flood Control study) o 801' R.O.W. Hawker-Crawford flood control Channel (determined by Flood Control Study) D. DWELLIDIG UNITS. (See Alternatives) 0 32 Estate lots to the north (minimum) o Maximum dwelling unit yield must be below 2260 d.u. Exhibits have been prepared to illustrate these common characteristics in the following pages. 8 \ -tl3��aADtt'1 , r UL- eIV r"'Ohm e� "3A AHH'41 0 tm eit C' v GC fZ R k Q , -! wo Ul Vj LU us; O qOlu Cam—ua C7'., �„"' �' 41C, r rs ui a ncfa wui s� w. uj%,' -3 S�TSAGlC n ®ftg` y. is � . ,y ti`v 3 z Quo atl � MZ to �..,a c nj.= �,"14ew Z��v m J �,maw - r 4 a wow 40y �' M a .mom Wy !10@i. u V r 1 LUe�� I'•' ?®j N 1 ion 04 Nr CL c7s' p. "M co �. ccCU C� Oo Cjw za u.< -jm> auj OM 9 E !2-32- �r t'!'k• N � S T jl d. .". }"� 5• It Zia UIZ ,x ' " W� Mu { to :.A jp„ Mm Qom: r . s' oa! M> 10 to Auk f. tj 10 4 cc J Oil; IAU rUP I'll, IM ca tuaw cd!1 41 us :3 ur �1 a� x1 1 7� IV 1 � r CD MLUJ ,<' cam Of- Sol } r� EM, �y �l f yt a N Litz aim 0,fn �LU .,dam 12 i a� 73 }<< ui Ul la IL F.. a Lu . ' !J d `k 55 fa Z li -A o C. Cc La to r <t c f Vie �•, Kf r { � �F wt }R iCr��4;. ~•#due+u.`.crrpgc7l�.Y'+�t�`��^!� Wit to sly 3 4rl k ' .!^tr. •,v `�., ( I,� ,,jlv.��l. i � • p + r•t .,� t°ft � �t�"F `yL�I�F�":'1�,.'h{,��a.'�r�NrA. ,;�!'��`. A. •,r t ; •k ,�, f•61z,.^,�' e •�•+�.+ a quc$TRIAN FACLrrV,' ;x' t r• �., y ,,,,,' •• : &WTERPPWrfVE PAM i uxsr , ,..r,;,.,, ,;�-�; r-, . b • '=: A t• �•, i+ .:(9lre'�'sM115. "•t""-' e.aW-0` k.. t J i, f i t� �Y r+. r t r ...}.r •�.t•;" PATH. Y y.+:�` r 'r !• • t ENTRY 8AN 3EVAi&WABi! �` •`" �' •t! Plk"AY.:.. y.. .: -�••�;p•.. _ • � i �: ��ier:euaw.,srwaar•eea-r rya s, --BS 39ARY OCHWL tos,4m a - r . •i� f,,,� RRMIfOY�NPM YIIOtl .F►e6aop Mt t •Ta ,,.. as p' t+afow-W—Osrl.catlt ."Mp*ey. a •,q f �':i.^:.:�•wc..rY�1' �Cfirf+�D�amoar.ra.wnt pRrpemaupr, ,. •�, „ _ .-t• amtw:sap,+n�eraesapmimGm. : .=�AFrc AD AcwrTO SCRWL.:t Acm 4A MIMS �RO+''EDEASIHA@R' ,osw ee4 vipkerw.. , ~ •i `,n.4` „. 1 � �t .�wu�avecatar.isl: r za.wma rs•emt- 1 am.-rs:• _RR£LOOCATEO VibESTERLc eaLM7 t , vaMerer pea aeraJ. r L •--MOLICR ARTERW.R=(lift R.O.W.1. Z J NgtlypRp..bragrpr arufetmd, ACMIS t +� i �1� :} •! TanM wnrttl.00urtLp+rA»terwt f t !: ,Yrawfa®p111 Neef,tp_tYr�i.+eewei COLLECTOR ROAD W R.O•W.) .w - •— SPECIALN'1"•MECTION Ar A •r _t d % 6xry rrawneem+eee':IHp oarkvriee. _ pewrpaawAmsia epr rs oms nwwtr t <`�. ~+tttr•ylt Sy 4l ,� WAWrAvrma t LANDSCAF¢SET9ACK ba�aalYw�pm ide.OeWlb+ar6lt �Ett?�TiCii,'AA9N � •' �.e°tO 11 ..t ���i�iIAVAIUIl Vt1 Li Ll TW A SPECIFIC PLAN l. N 88 " 'i � � �^c' I xR� " 3�� `� L�1 �' a � � �� ��� O o a � Q p a� , „ ., ,� � � � �� _ I ,�a � .� _ � I .. � t of p w f � � ��� � .. � � � � � � �� � �� � � . � � �� . � � �, �- � `��. ��r I �'��� a �� ` - � �! ��� i' �. ``TSB.c �' s 5 �`4 i .S`.n'FKn r yM�\n+ J�/4 R $ f i NOTE- CB PAR (U*ilFaNTS All three ,;altjelr"n"iktiv �ptnpose. park land that a:tisfies the miunimum ;;park rekdAui eheA,,t- far each ziltert lyve. Theses figures are :prepa�`red. ta' '�mpare "alterna+t�ves aac ci11 b finaliaed. ,upon�-�s&Iactian at-la- prafe^rre# alternative. '�. FORMULA The: r� = ments far quire ,Park .man 5t2actig by the City,of Fontana are derived from ,,The farmdia to. be used is an follows: a € a Single famil detached: w � 3_• ac.. 2 9-6�� eo le x d.u.)A ; a Multi. Eamil�r� ttacheaP a 3.0 Vic. (I f'0 ads apie x`d.u.-g) j people E. APPLIED TO ALTERNATIvES; \` ALT."I ALT. 2 ALT. 3 3, F. Units 1421 15t11 ;._ 105 M. F. Unite 1i 758 62G 527 Total Dwelling Un�. s 72179 2121 2232 a Park required (by 4 1 ) �6.25 ac. 16.3 aa. 17.67 ac.- C. PARR ACREAGE PRO:VIDJ` ,I ALT„ 1 ALT.,2 Alt, a. Park 8..0 10.1 8.,0 ^ b. Equestrian Facility/ Interaretive Park g.0 910 9.0 E c.-Linea' 1'arkwag/110 R.,O.W. Parkwhy Credit 1.5 2.4 2.7 y 'd. Tmprovi�id Easement , (50W `credit) 0 14.0 0 TOTAL P6?TE9TYAL Pe�FSP UREDIT' .50 35.5 20.50 TOTAL PARK RE001RENENx 16.25 16.3 17.67 OVER (UNDER) ROQUI:REMEHT �2.25+ 15.2+ 2:;83+ 16 ` a 2-->7 rt ' a, y dhui . 1 to cacc a aurd Ilk' �S 7 J •�" �K � r�� ti L �h n g .t. `L1 t/tu 4 l'g r it ,�ycx 4 t4i I lkv Y' .w.,• Raj/1I ��,. a. a — _ VIZI.. A 73$FH�1 xsla'�S L Es tMMUM 1TIEN CONCEkS i � c, ALTEItNATSV.� 1 y � , Plan FA.a-uzia3W'� u PubX a c e, emengw unfiiap vied, utill B ata site, in, Efiiir� } ,area�C�sa •res na" ,y hk�orl�o o Hawk}fir C a o d- �henri,6 -�e&os:te'$ to eastern boundary for p av�: d+ '„�cor.�tiguous x ev°er'OP601& land. in lwwdr " por s t . o Shoats ma owr r rim fro, 'rdugh t=iStjcg s CtC p� and ATenues„ lAMits qr tASt ; o At to mci'axusr artert�aol. a spats }t, ;pe,n• eAwf onme*t 9, made w �t�i s'co1 end park< o Loop roAoi° 03 artersax'ta 'mre;a+te inward sense oaf' nedi�titior�iaoi3` o Hig�he t den iei y to so.luthwost corner of s"i te { { o Medium dsity to. twiddle and east € site F20p S.f.�a '2 a Low d`ensi,ty� to! to0.4nd no:&th (2args;e,�tate lok �1 \ a MOS)t esta,'tr jtobV 7i d;«u. 1s { f o Highast 'prercen� aga, of �a Its,-family dwellling u�lits a 3A.71 fi7s& d6 cur o Lowest pe?rcenug{s of. s3°dg .e! f�a'M.J.3 y dwa17%ng.;wits z 65.3& LEA- 0 53 Sattaahed]t units are townhouses o 661 det<acht&units are- on: lots of 7200 s.f. or larger ` o Smallest lot is 6000 s.f. J o 16� detached units are on lots of 10,000 s.f. or la g a 51. detached units are 1.0 acre,,,tilus o Second most dwelling.."its, 21`15 d.u. }> a ' y r r ALTERNAT M, 1l _. DWELLING OT Gross ° ' Den. ' Lot Type.. -A-are Dt3lAC i?.U« + ac. I26,a 4 2 l.(i 71 z,3 A2 zdr96fl-l.fl= ac. 43.0' 7.5 3.5 150 .9 HZ 6,000-7,199 _ ?9�5 l4«(1 6.0 477 �Xs Subtotal' 3 aE;99.`1t -- 147r MULTI FAM14Y Cl Tovmbom 24.9 4.4' 16.0 398 18.2t CZ ' Apartmm*ts' 38.0 "«2 20.01 36 34.?# " TOTAL MLLING UHITS= 1. PAM AND,-bPmN SPACE X`hd 5� pr. * Park j Lineal: Parkway Publ,:c gasamtnt Improved Vasev%ent t 0 Sceni Open Space 39.4 * Cquestrianr. Interpretive Park 9.0 Landscape Setback --- Dev;Aopmert (49.1) E raaemenL F Su tots • 112.7 ac * 'Park credit `(assumes equestr an faa ,_3ty (a.Q ac.) and historic Cite (I,.D ac.)) OTHER School lo. Commercial 4.0 , Major Artarial iRCad 7.3 «8 ac- TOTAL- AZ>RLIS 57fl.? ac« 100.01, 26 o , v „ �f, ,.,�11 ,' Batt xE .♦ � ' :♦ I \ etaaer+ �� � �1�l1TRA¢AI. FOh,'YST f •r'. i `'Y •.i` s !if ` �� � Iv. - �t i ,� � ear• i e• ��•♦'cti.,r Ar i 4A ortetivt tClrreR a \. 4.. r• J,• ;, i3y tiY Z ♦" a _as ♦ �fr lAd. i• r, eeegaueax oi:�a Is'�M exa S � .�\ � i.. Z 1 'f +�I� AY 1pt Ye• teM eul�.. Yt xa ,L�; At ur .a.o r..,o_ate!i•--t•SO.(�. a J II A IM j, t7^ n '! t•i .1� ��1 '9 L.�y ���.:�Y.f ^i•' •� l��:[�.i ee K2. 1.f0F1 Yi1�1Y f 1J.�1T-{l�yly • `' '^ �,�. •. .,. t �i --•—,..rat }•: +-- � r j tl W rx xwel u+f�sa<I ao. •ael si .atl `'f6F t00KAt YtlY F c :�• .tiK` �.: -.—�. �„r�. 7 1 -,� �a,tst xeMTlixAt�aa f tealx�s,sar i I 6. ♦'= • i � wt.•�,• { !� -. r}:. i^ xeefettA af.t&S1 xftx Iqa , e�wttl a !s xeoa Wf•xts+ Y�r�e�m pe:e � •, L.. ��, +eMenAar4+a not nesu+r,•• wi�F�s �3" s- wit S s t t•..e •.ii.a a. !e xy ." s.. 1' �j'rr YiF 41 34 aL a a. ! 1) uaa rt k as t,• t � _� 'f '� Ssiteee evur>cin.+ . +. r A0 S ERS t '��xrs ioSs aci i S �•• �\ •�l W YiT AYC9a` • r4s3 i l.•l iri r. -�� ;A SPECIFIC PLANI,jPREPARED BY THE [ODGE_ CITY OF E"UNTANA "77"M AY.TEI V&T7C� LOS 1 P a hla r atteirial serves, as' community: Inls tarDuncan Can CWRRQad th�augh praja�t � o I,o ro ro cs a£f m_,450t arterial e�cl aes 1 parks', . 'town, - and rletaciAd., h xe to tea�te. czozgmt4nitr�c� ' ' a Com�mun ty. C+V?r li nks 1 publicos�esr sad t�ii dla 4asemr� ,t rs Sc i�ool � n°d gad aaernt paz�'t 3# ac.A an pnbl is easergerct mi+ dle a' e; xa�gxovxed dpa 'space � and ;anKe�fi to.�t�ail _s�s�ems o' Coagnere3I sus a� n� ir$t :na or ante sec's pn at3 jacerwfi to park toy cre t« a mmanrnity ae�ter 0 tr M a j ar g eo�r & is r a gc l ii ong, �`,urth Pon ta, f` roadwmys,; arerotr3iiedast;at entry,."then°vatic at i� tQ tirstntexse'ca.an, then as air ainaved14, green public easement next to parts and $choal 9raunds,, t and finally a landzeaped entry at �nopthwestern ,edge of the project-, o <r,t)on road kee oval �` �r Moo aeterfa � ,- ~ � p,r traffic ff � � .- ogging trail was hYtce bath o��r.;le;s the,*tx eunity. gore -nYt cOgInect ,to: surrounding 1 snd, uses. ' , o Minimizes amount of grading/f necessary Dior;: `ir (eridr lots ,,and roads by siting t6s ,,pa l sl ra. .cx' sting 0 grades more often. r Lowest .density to �resCezn air 'ttortk4i��tt "portions' of site o Moder"ate ty to soothe r] 'asld :eastern portions of site it �• _ J `=' ' o . ghaxt=;density in ' *ant<er or along freeway_ f1d 6 southOst x Q Attached units are 29,lt of tit Pt (620 .d.u.) �( 0 52:9$ of }kta'yhe�" wits (_-W. of 620� are '.townhouses and will be designed t4-s city' sale standards o 21W of aetachad units are,14,OQD s.f lots or, larger o 70% of '6etachsd`z,?.xts are on 7,200 s.f. lots or I.ej�Ser L. o Smallest lots are 6,000 a..t. (gross) o Lowest dwelling Unit yields 2121 d.0 9aetu...= 1�J 4 77 74 ALTERNATIVE 2a, a DWELLING'LOT SINGLE FAMILY. Gross Lot Gross .Den. Lot TYpe Range _ Acre. DU1AC D.U. D.U. Al Lot 1.G +.ac. 87.1 1S.3 ( 1-0' 32 1.`5, A2 lot 10,G"O6-1.0 ac 810.1 14.l 3.+5 230 13.2 B1 Lot 71,200-4:9919- 147.8 46.1 5.0 739 35-.0 ; B2 Lot 6:,000-9.199' 7`5..1 13 1, 6,0 450 21.2 21 S.btot�l 390.1. ac. 6P..6$ - 'S01 dzu., 70.98 MULTIPLE 'FAMILY/4 k� Cl Lot T.H:" 24.�}r 4.3 16.0•- 390- 15.44 . C2 Lot Apart,, 11.5, 2.1, 2.0..0 23:0 10.7 Subtotal: 35.9 ac. 6.4% -- 6520 d.u. 2971W TOTAL DWELLING UNITS 2121 D,-U. ' PARK AND OPEN SPACE' 'y * Park 10.1' .8 y �`• * Lineal'Parkway 2.4 .4 Public Easement 26.8' 4.7' * Improved Easement 28.6 54 ; (50% Fark-Credit `_ ?1'-A ac.)' Scenic. Open 'Space 39.4 6.9 * ,Equegtiian/Inter pre''iive Park 9.0 1.6 Land-nape Seta 1ck Dev�,L,ppment. Easement (49.1) Subtotal: IlSi-,7 ac % * Park Credit (assimes,equestrian facility (3.0 ac.) and historic site (1.0 ac.)) I OTHER .3chool 10.4' 1.8 Commercial 4.6 .8 Major Arterial Road (110' Row) 12.2 2.1 Subtotal: 2 ..2 ac 4. %' TOTAL 568.9 ac 1001 r d :aria �,. 23 ! I 3 f StdD} BER4CARZjRtD flAEISRtAt FOR y a � 1 � �� e• � �� o ��� ; f• ! t� F arm D7BI1t51660T TM \\ �•j � r ' iA ewrs ` � � � •Lt � � �. A. t i...e +.�A)lir as OY.tt;4aF!R as I i^' V ♦ LY may, ry••1 At LaT" �r�l rRrt A13 ad 1 aG R filar L '' _,• .•y+��!C`���`J�eRy[, t �� L M ri•. :...© tt Lot t t�1 r1.as 1 MI.12A r aa+ ! 1•t M ap L (.!r w�.Y�'� ''4 t 11 Y + h. ^� "•.� i,�� �' � .. as I-0r; �,ar 1G'lir•RtF,�aO l rti.; i t t a• ? ' _ �•"' t ;•F(�a Lsr' F he irtlTu ru ary i aa� t' ; rfr• ..Y j•- _ ��� 5�v¢ �IWTOFStSIt abS.. : € ©as LAR. Aa'.u•Iti.s• mt aso,rwr'.rwr+ a t, yq �„y.a tsA1+l"t ; J•i #.i.. aax Taa isir ao,ataj ow ' �Mtl'tRa Y x`tAVaS .Naori 3z - ave171tA y, +Alai larYSe eaeeY��. �. � g ltr Lwaata t! . t 'at• •`•• f.a •r wr.r14a aanL aa.ey. .tit .�rtaaD•Ie ae •: um BFVA"E WAS 7i •A� n 4 , r Y •i'F$ rLl4tW :r 9f L tiJ. It/ u�K terWtA. N♦ + .f 1T•LGit ala ad {• ••'.. :Yf'I''! i >Butc 4 P4GEfBASFE KF k L su1.. aumr pa � a •r e j ;trn.; «.urn..• `srwti ..L ;• ,ate �Nl YYi:s�rif.�rr W}• II t 1 III F R ' aasW )1aLL•A.Aq 4aM>tfM '�} rarau Mtataf ML9r{. ••i•` tus♦feYr r aYli WiR / �YOa. a1aa Yr� et Yi r 10soa•sas � 1 c .. h$. . f aAa at u - o-a� w Lars • " rA � / moo • t y� }: +4 SUK"T AVSrrA j .01 '`' ir�noA 9ASffd t. " a ', 1t•111� iJU LI J.r� , ITY QFa SPECIFIC A�N HUNTERUNTER ��°� � s PREPARE?By THE .0 EONTAN�A yt er _ `q-` `'� $ aan Faaturets n V 't9rlcr arteetall; serves, as, caramu ty._ Linkthzciugh p=roj ec t t ec an '�nyaii Ocac ~. a Pubalzc;� 3 er�sezttents:' urri +proved°; used �o sepa a;t i. ' G =•Loop rc�a ofk artekial roid to create,- Late nzr neig'�orh � for a4oh= thixdT off. o PaiGr ors` sc!hco, =anc� paz ste a)t �tter of neiglhkaaiooQ o, `ma�ot artexal. �1 o Moderatesras"ias z � 0 ,7 Low,densmFty +n M4a, , j! eAt,Add top, ,portions of iAtz " a a Mc)44argt `z3 n °itl, = ati. Tower afi4 t4461.e a°ast and,,ceniral pa5:tions);af ste< a Uigh denzik s3 n eastern, boundaxy in, over snt3 ` sniddler x'h)�.rd5= site-' a '_ a Lowx35fi per-centage -0f •att ached tmitSL 21.fiA t527�"dr:t.) ` 0 56 `aCtached unity area town, ous�s o Hit}aeat pgrceatage _ ietiach�a us is T t17a5 d.u1 `-i o Ama1Umst- 14tw t;- S s QQa s,.f A craaa) 0 cs 70� art==ached urt tg_SIT 4 Y ,aces &r Cl �£. or argcmr<' rt o j9%detached unit'sate 7r206 i%.f_ er 1 ger o 156 detaaKM units dire 10,;'Odb sxf -r larger 0 2 drat etted units re 1.9' 4cr`6 or Larger o Fighest d.u.° yield. 2232 d.u. � .'I r i I gg y t• ALTERNATIVE 3 . DWELLING LOT c ?' SINGLE f.AMILY _ ' ross Lot Gross, ;\ Deg. Lot.Tvpe Rar�,9e Acres : .. ?)' DU_/AC D.U. A.U. -- - ) Al Lot 1.0 + ac 87.1 �5.•4-,- 1.0 32 1.4 .. A2 Lot lrxt. 00-1x 0 ac 64 l '" 3.5, 224 1t*.2 B1 Lot 7,2Q4-9,999 77.8 13.7 5.,0 30 17.4 B2 Lot -:16,OG0,.7,199 90.r8 ;1tF 6.0 545 6' 24.4 B3 Lot _ 5,000 5,099 7,9.3 14 6 5 515 23 Ebtotal: 399.0 ac. 7Y.1 --- -"1705 d.u. 76.4! MULTIPLE FAMILY' r, Cl Lot T.H. 18.,3 3.2 15,.0 293 13.1 C2 Lo2 Apart. �.T7 2.0 0.;0 234 lU,f, a I Subt;�tal: �3C 0 ac.5.2%- - - 527 d.u, 23.6& 4t TOTAL - 2,232 1}.Bi. PARK AND OPEN SPACE L ° P'srk a- 8 1.7 4, * Lineal Parkway 2.7 0.4 i Public- Easement 54.8 9.6 Improved Easement 0 Scenic Open Space- 39.4 6.9 * Equertrian/ •, Interpretive Park 9.01 1.6 Landscape Setback Development Easement (491) Subtotal: 4.7 ac 20.2% _ < S; * Park credit (assumes equestrian fac site (1.0 ac.)) litg ((f.0 ac'.}. and historic QTH-R '.)choul ll o-0 1.8 Commercial Major Arterial Road a (110' Row.) 13.7 2.4 Subtotal: 2 ac 4.7' TOTAL 5 ,7.4 ac 100 261 i . t•?] - +ii� fi ;: ai"'Mrt js S�i/.8F i64$SAC'!L?1pA710itV4 F"NST .ti ] �•y.1i i 'i t i > r dtYQ.11�.COt TTM „ 4y aittilrf- lilw+lati bw.0'.:tu, ,.Y.• c :! ' �i: �,_' '+ .� ; Y Ma it,,h•s •.3t Q„ps1 ,rt iw.� a as�v '.. a ! _•� �� i -j, r't }.;t, C .. Q ei;laf 0.ae�:n.ol caa.e.,laesf a. '> L�, a�• Ye+� a� 1 .���,f, 1 ++y� � �'i Q HtY9 .J.�:/tlV ti. 3• •s ut� �„a—�' t•, aOaF iem,sa,rl�s z s. s • t �✓t. ly '� � � �"• MA iw TA eH t lll.2U I tfa t li•. � ' •••, �•• �. .r'Y .�Y•':�r �.��. H� r�t ..i. a. ii O®�iww�a/�rw,s a �.�iN}: C V � .• rye .. !,':` 4 YnG w tow r..a '� "iu t•�,. �d.M /Is]Cytwt/t„a+ •.1t�. tS '�.• +.� .yC SAN SEVRFE WA£FM�' �' t � rr. ~ ,stow I H 4 ! >i,�-t ,•i�lt.t i :-... _ ,s � �>.v H I�Fi BeLlBPE r p�. fq/tltt ♦ r .E.SYti� t t• s �^ ttrrrir.,w y t • a •� M ns�Pa,tai ulalWR a �• �::• ,• ,_ H t. ;' , /iH-a1M Yi/.6M t >�. j� •iW tOt� tovxs i wlo to - g¢r�MAPAsar !a UNTE S �A SPECIFIC PLAN I PREPARED O t TANA ,T(b Y 4 6 ; �tiiA�I:��S. `I In rz�fWxng�4- is "�il, rr��je.*` �e�r.ratzvAes. 1�ha're are says �.` rii$fer+ nces Gb iaec� r ��1 Elgwmc Exam * antc � , .. tiriewpdx,r alit�itse e a b3, evred ta: fcaskNbrt te. 77 FrOm a, mar 7e&C"w xS;t,' 3 �h3' VGi$, c'l2�'eOIS3 �d Via' v iable. fikxe z a,xk t ' �?orsaa<�a zind ,,t de est a s rc g d'demandor ze�szde: a k o e gh�i{ate' m er al �I :Mix and l c, e =w Ytt etit��' �e ,. ma:s Lam"ice Z + s prz, rzsr a1 a Mw e put cent a : AZ, f1 gph >+ecz�3t� F,a twi VIA,� c „ A1; Xtt� v� sm ?l�fat +;�' h;^ =t#trakte��crws ct has t2�, aam a traftio r 44wie A i .1 ha , ` a �? .. ; simiin��r .tty A awma ut traffsid, ircUT" ITT s has; a i?preatevr ssrapaa ecaer tk �6.1 in(4 are intarmally, bile T' melghbox ktrgd,;r..gxc otao, and All 4 rota v 2 is a comm:ani care: n�ae�:,a �s7;eah qh alS a2teresaticreE vYt2 provide qua li t r,, 'esidenfiL @31urpriPi@riSr feed ;,t222l1t Alterrka,ive l at p,. iding it new neighhc�hoads a vza al a na ffi t sittuature (cO=Uai ly c re) art Went jt w tthin tYi� C'r .t of , ontianaW " ! (�J -0,22, Cl2'S'OF RANCHO GUC"ONGA o DATE; January 1P 1987 v > TO: Chairman and Members of the' lanning Commie ion f FROM:: Brad Buller., City Planne K BY, Rubin Yu, Associate Planner - SUBJECT: HUNTERS RI0GE SPECIFIC"'PLA71 �aF The three Hunters Ridge Specific Plan land use alternatives were brought to. the Design Review Comnitteaalor informal review on JaigAary £ 1987. After reviewing the alternatives " the Committee indicated that Alternative_ Two, with incorooration, of `the following changes, andfor concerns, is the least,objectionable of the three: 1. Reduce the overaTI`density in the southern one-third of { the property to thsi lc�tel-more, compatible with the rural . character'df -the s:rr'Onding area. 2. Provide low density residential- area and additional open space along Summit Avenue to serve as a transition and f buffer between the proposed development and the Very Low Residential designation south Of Summit Avenue in Rancho, Cucamonga. I 3. EliMinate apartments along, the I-16 Freeway. 4. Provide adequate equevtrian facilities and improvements in and or adjacent "to the upper utility easemant. The facilities should oe an integral part of the regional trail system.: S. Provide adequate edge treatment with open space and landscape setback along San Sevaine Wash. A trail along this edge would also be appropriate. 6. An east-west route across San Seva{il(p mash and the j property as proposed by the. Y, si' `valley Foothills Community Plan, is not desirable. It is recommended that the Planning Commission incorporate the Committee's comments in their recommendation to the City Council. BB:RY:ns i +r r r + G4I'@Y OF R � GUC�MOX Date. IRS-,7 TO: Rangy hay Cu �y l Plziml _,�omisslon� Fr�sm9:. H W.. 3arvjae Diu, r SUb `aCt: Cd*i'"-SE s�tik:..'IFI3E NORTH TOW � N�IC%HBOBt�QOL+"$.pi`1�K' �-�r - ,The Cityr �tutci]� at tisei er fi mee ng oi` �aruax t 7, )68s7 J " diweate'a"that.'thW abCovet saFsrendod- subjlocto eez deerrjbed it, �I the. attszho .. die for4fardecf'1 tha.Frarifto eommtVal= fbr, review, and, ent- px`.ioi:-to 'dburibil.=action:.. ME addit.-Umal -inft ation-is de&Jradt VI-easy advise. � BHba J I i� AWL { , s 1 ti e TT24 S CITE OF RANCHO C-,-TCANdoNGA STAYS REPORT Date Decker 24, 258 To zCity Council and City nStager From: Bill Holley, co MMVXF,:�'servicea Diractoc j Syr Dare L onard, Park 'Pro7eots Ccsar4inatox i Subject: Conceptual. , Design for the North Neighborhood Park Site I ' Pecommondat'i can; It is the recaiia' andation of the Park Development C�mmissihn that the City Council adopt the conceptual design for North Tcwix Neighborhood Park as attached, including the installation of sports field lighting. Further, .fit is requested that council authorize the Community !Service Department to sec*ire engineering services for development of construction drawings implaementing the attached design. 1 Pundi:na• � This project is being funded through the Community Development, Bl=k Grant (:BDG) Program of the Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development ($300,000), and by Park L,3nd grant funding by the Sate of California {$I5t5,0Qo) *rr project total of $450,0oo.' 3ackaround• The conceptua design Lar Wortt. Town Neighborhood Park wat developed thr"gh a series of meetirgs with residents of the commuZi.ty. The attached plan was de:-iverl by the process,and includes group picnic, childrens play area, exercise trail., shade structure, softball field, restroom and parki+ig facilities. The design was greeted with enthusiasm by the community except for the softball field. This residents requested field to contain night lighting. Previous Policy an Neighborhood Park design has denied lighting because of lighting glare and. night time note in close Proximity to residential areas. The community was consi.stant in their desire to have lighting and provided representatives at the park Development commissions The Commission concurred wwth the residents desires and fox warded to City Council. a recommendation folly: =r-' Staff R4port/NNd*`u Towle Park t� Page Two, apprOVall, qt- the G"b41MeYlt' � / t�� au As, do j��owiding sports field li(ijtinq� a� the Nc�z".h Tows xteighbor o Park; Q, or si",tas +ye(s a 5+indxo`.%ts, 3Z1A05$ S°4Gte te3r13'Onr�Ate2r1 3RaXT kJ$CrQlp+�� carid dSt@S for poslaible`rs. nxght� 11jhtin x-ti:houtd n�ed`� than 1ihi°xicp must 7aq� ]s4gted a on, a case, -by, cash b and t at night ght $i g of sports fieids� array not��O appropriate in all izrstartea. 3 If we can answer any,questionas, Please do not hesita (e to � �` DL/JS z, Encl. `A 7 I j r u � .fir Yt�� �� • � rf �� N {7( N a, u + A-A H� '— K° r