Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1987/01/28 - Agenda Packet
;� �, ,� x �� � ��,� �, �r �, ::�. E ^'Y 'p�.i T��,�Q{F�+yt 1 �r CUCAMgNGA 7Mr1I ;SI }1V AGE 1077 -) WEDNESISAY JA.NUARY 28,1987 7.00 P.M., f RANCHO ClJd BitHJPi"CALIFORM 'I L Pledge of Aanare EL Ron call Commissioner Barker Commissioner Mcl•Tiel Commissioner Chitie8 Commissioner Toistoy r Commiw'donex Emeriek i 31.0 Announeeionts W. consent Calendar The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and norreontr6versiaL. They will be acted on by the Commission at one E time without discussion. ,If anyone has conM 'oVer any item, it should be removed for discussion. A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86-34 -TAG DEVELOPMENT -The development of an 11,153 square foot corporate and administrative of flee building withlight + ' storage facilities on D.61 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6rF2-located on the north side of Trader erk Rtreet,927 feat west of Raven Ayenue-APN 2Z0-381-6. j B. ''TRACT 10035 (DESIGN REVIEW) - RAWCH.O ASSOCIATES - Design Review of building elevations and plot plans for 35 single 'family lots on 15.7 acres in the Low Density Residential District southeast of Red hill i (2-1 dwelling touts per serf), located y Country Club,south of Calle Corazon,- APN$a7-631-41 through/ f, 23 and 207-641-01 through 12. (j, G. lJ}1SIGN hEVIEW FOR TEIQTATIVE,TRACT 1`2969-XAZEDJAIN- The review of reprised ,plot plan, two new elevations and for plans(Plan A2 and B2)to`repiaee the approved Plan A and Plan,B for 20 lots of--the total 26 lots, in the Low Medium Presidential District(4-8 dwelling units per acre)loeated on the south side of Arrow Highway at Erl%via Street-APN 207-222-9. D. TRAILS FENCING STANDARDS VW Rublre eiting 'the.foltbaving: ems are public hearings in,which cdiearndd indavrduals r nnap Voibe th4:r opinion'of the related pro;eeiA lease•wait ta.be,recognfted;hyd:0achiprolpot e Chairman and address, tie.COMMissfon by st ".ing. your^tuctne araddress All,such opinions stiaTl be Iimited'to 5 minutes per itidividual-.' ti f 'E E' GEL MAPI ii,,81 .14GDIEiCA4GION-QRORTELL NR�fPIiE�S - - Vest to eliminate. a'conditlbw of.approval requiting,the• - 1! foot High masonry, wall and additional x ut�wallp'for of a`sr� {6) lane a, along exsouth tmunde line£or artyapprave«i;nf ice . .• par subdivision l•sated air` " 1Zecenibear 10,1$8' e:so o ofBasa;�W,'Road s and Gactehan eelNuthes3A207=0222ner (Cotinued from s A subdL F. E a+ 1QN:MIEN�A,Ii ASSESSMENT A"NIL P`A}BCEL MAR'•1[0238 t GlI0WMQ..NGAS,'G-01UNTY' Wl "EH DL'3�itT - �hi lon of x 3:W&orea o C 2att "irtYo 3'parceis in the Flood Control de`signatibn located on,the northwest cornet' of 11 thill B4ulevard and San Diego Avenue - APN 207-101-43. � ( tinued.'from January.14 G. TIMR EXT,PNSIG2N FOR C.ONDI'3`ifJ1�A& USE PERMIT' 8 -21 - ,. AL L yOMA CFIRi3TiAPT CH[7RCIi _A request Ytr Gonpert g r existing 1,8118'84da a fbot sifiglerfMnRy residence to an office fv'j the Q(ta.Loma-Christian.Church on .25,acres of,land in the LoiG Residential District(less than.2 dwelling.units per acre)located on the west side of Sapphire,across from Orange-APN 1062.,332- 23. (Continued from January 14,1087)- H. ENVIXQNME9TA1L ASSESSMENT AND GEAIERAL PLAN AMENDMENT-86'-03>A.-K'AUPER-A request to amend the Land Use Element of the General;Plan from Flood Control to Low Medium Density Residential (4-9 dwelling units per acre) for 40 acres of land located at the southwest corner of the extensions of Banyan and Milliken-APN'201-271-55. (Continued froir'January 14,1987) i 1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 87-01A - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA-An application to amend theiland Use Element of the General flan from Office to either LSw Residential (2-4 dwelling units per arcre)or Low-Medium Reidential(44 dwelling units per acre)for 1.1 acres,of land at the northeast corner of San Bernardino Road and Carnelian 5'treet-APN 208-49-09,32,60,74,77. d. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12970 ANMRSON--A residential subdivislon of 67 custom lots,and.one remainder parcel on 66.9 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District(less than 2 dwelling units per acre),located on the north side of highland Avenue between Etiwarda and.East Avenues-AP14 255181 I1,12,13,19,20,21,and Td. In edition, the applicant has requested a Tree Removal Permit to remove two (2) east-west Eucalyptus windrows and one (1) north-south Eucalyptus windrow. j i " :fZ7 K: E&YIR'(5rN1VIENi'AL ASSESS AND VAI:IANC 88-08 :FPTNrF,EI+ A 4,r .-� ee�quueme `af o w th eoe st t3 xnxmui heightiv190eeid to:sltosu an existuig.<antenni�50 fast ui.height to be°extended to?0 tfee 4? sere.'parcel in the Very Low'Residei�tial'Distract (li ss them";2 " l7rtelliiig` units per acre) located 'at 5 2'l C�aral.Ilvenue - $PN IOG,I�212-19� VIL New Business L. HOME ,OCOUPATEON PE, ��Y$5-210�` '.A1LOR- ,Appeal of staffer 7d00DW%1 i denyimg a Florae Occtipatian-"Permit at. 8159 ' 1'Talactiite Agenue t (Contanued:fro"ni January 14,'2�$7y M. REMORMENr Ft Eft, ,,W 86-41 AMC-AL ftOI=EP81FS - The c7evelopipent of a 47't892 square goof 3'=5tary'®fY£ce lc3ing on 4 24 advis,of land ill lie haven Avenue Overlay°District(Subare& G)of,'the.InOLY&ial S- fir Pie'a rlt the northeast corner of` Ilaven and..Oth.Street A_pN,209-411: t. -? N. 'BAIT AND TACKLE STORE IN SUBAREA 4 VIL Director's llegorts f O. AWARDS FOR DESIGN EXCELLENCE PROGRAM UPDATE P. SAN SUA_FNEI.ETIWANDA. PLANMNC'AREA: WORKSHOP '- This item has been referred by the Design Review Committee;it is requested• that a Workshop be.schd.dteled for full Commission review and policy direction. Q. DE'VELOPMENT'RE`;M—W 87-04-'POWER PARTNERS(EDW:ARDA CINEMA) The request, to modify the approved elevation; by j c?imictating the required reveal, for a theatre located at the northW2st corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue. VM Commission Business Ili. Public*Comments This is the time and place for the gene'rnl public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda- X. Adjournment Tne Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an II p.m.adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shalt be heard only with the consent of the Commission. I, Janice Reynolds, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true and accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was poSLGii saventg two(72)`hours p«ior to the meeting per-A.B.2674 at 9320-C Base Line Road, a rfTr zan� n VIP!NITY MAP a.. {y Hit LSIDI1 Wt t *—A N V AN - � e t 1 i u�t s i mailY� 4 AR cc -� . a zn Tthcc ik ® 4 ® Alt i7 W Ic i SAN 8 NNARDIN FROM Y C�[t�T��YO�yF ■p Ucq-yay M �sqy `p tuft .r i CITY of RANCIaO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT O F 9 U > DA?E: January 8, 1987 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM. Brad Buller, City Planner BY; Debra Meier, Assistant.Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESWNT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86-34 - e-devel opment of an 11,154 square:toot irpO,a a an administrative office building with light storage facilities on 0.61 acres of land in the Industrial Partl�-District (Subarea. 6) located on-the north side of Trademark Street, 927 feet wes..t.of Haven Avenue - APN: 210-381-6 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A. Action Requested: 1 issuance df a Negative Declaration. B. Surroundx:ng Land Use and Zoning: Nor vacant landv��§l�na Specific Plan Subarea 6 South Vacant land; Industrial Specific' Plan Subarea 6 East - Vacant land and. existing 'light industrial facilities, Industrial Specific Plan Subarea 6 West - Vacant land; Industrial specific Plan Subarea 6 d' C General Plan Desi nations: Project Size - Inaustrial FarK Borth - Industrial Park, South - Industrial Park East - Industrial Park West Industrial Park D. Site Characteristics: The site is presently vacant and void of any significant: plant materials.. The site slopes from north to south at an overall rate of about Z percent. Aft existing berm r traverses the site along the north property, line and this berm acts as flood protection for the site. Consequently, the bem will be shifted northerly to allow development of this project. Curb and gutter is existing along Trademark .Street, additional street improvements will occur with development of the project. ITEM A �LNr c sao REPbi€1 DR 86=34 t�1DE�1E DPlITa as Janu'ary,.28,= Page 2 . r E. Parking Calrculations: _ 4r�Y S � - Nuer Number" Typa I Square Parking of Spaces. of Spaces of Use Footac�P. . 14tiot Requitred Provided 0 Office 1011665 .Ij25O 2a 27 Storage 4,48i ijb000 g 4 _ r. Total 31 31 1L.: ANALYSIS A. General: The applicant is requesting Emir-po ntacl,Assessment for the constructt' ,c,f a 2-story office and storage facil ity. Upon,;^provii of the Negative Declaration, .the City Planner w01 grape final approval of the project based on a?ndf'cns reoownded by the Design and Technical Review-i:6wittees., B', Design Review G ittea:' The Design Review Committee reviewed this projeakat 1'7 their meeting of January 8, .1387 girth,Committee iii�mberi Larry McRiel,, Suzanne CUttea and Brad Buller present. Committee recomOinds approval of this project with the followipg conditions: 1. An,-'employee, outdoor eatirf4 area shall b provided at the northeast corner of the site. ., A detailed design should be submitted for further Committee review and approval prior to issuance of building permit, 2. A low profile concrete wall 3-3;5 feet high should be provided to screen the first under-building parking space. i 3. The color of the roil-up door shall blend' in with the natural concrete color. An accent stripe at the top of the roll-up door is acceptable. *r PI.,_, I�l1G C,t SSi RE aRT€ 0 t -anuar�n8 2�a6 Page 3! ' v' C. Technicalc R`evitewi Committea: The Techni'carT. Reylirewf GbmOttes has reviewed 'thoits project ands deteM *;0 than if iisi-Ganststent with City Standards: end Prd`nances, r F U. -Env!Ironmentafl :Assessment:. Upom rev4ew of Part E of the iniettaii[ itudy andt cm', �etion Of Part I> ofthc%Ehvifrorim�itaI Check�f tst,"staff-Vi' found►ia SAtg"'Afa rant impacts, rdIated to t.-m dev'el!opmenti of this bwdidimg,W, IIt, REC"ENDATIONz Staff.recoffmnds issuance of a Megan ve 4ecl arati on for Oevel opment Review 66-34, Rea, xy ted, ' or ul ' City Plapner BB:RM•te Attachments: Exhibit "A - Site Utilization Map b Exhibit "B" - Situ Plan Ekhfibit "C"' - Building Elevations Exhibit "4" - Conceptual Landscape- 'I Exhibit "E« - Conceptual Grading. f 4-kIpur"" l J�Jj* t a r /' �iesnt I roaaat r vsssva I vtssnt �lRtMfi oils vn�at °n�iatad' kfei nsant. I. T"wt f vaat �faaat rw�w1 ��` j •/. � � aleigll � sshlleq a •�w.l � �,LxNtrLi9 • WYa�ir�l�y�..�. t \\ 3 reaae4 raawt� nesn3 � � � � f \� twan4 GUrMaa 0tnet � � •i— - NORTH _ CITY OF ITL.Nit Aw lore, . RANCHO CUQAVVIONG�1: �a:T:ITLEt.�`' ACE r:_. ®sc�� �- aer•.•.a � �rc •w• Tridemwk Street; Y g BSI Saudo•mm u ap bat to taaaN.►lie fNR B� k t NORTH CITY OF AZAA PLANNING DIN'iSK?K.N EX IMAT.; t A-� w� r �� C: CC®CmC®CCU PLANT PALETTE MESS@ car{'.;�fpLpnacAwearw eAL►Irpa . � � ,. EueALrP*us errAr000rlA uuwwsceNr€c mw—. r LIpUWAtHAR atvaACWWA, - ALEANCAx awE¢r•NxA11 ,: .y JACARANDA AQ� - JAL"Af1ANCA � 4 FLATA"ACERFOUA - LONOOM''lIANETME rTy PLATARUS AAt:zMQjN CALFWRPA aTGLQRf 2 'f SkRUSS: AQA►ANTNGSAPWICIMl La.T OF%TH€NIL€ AZAL€A SPECIES AZAIC$:.. OAMeSA YAAMDRLD#A NATAUPLW Na Cu€ paA sSrENsa k.aucus , ;Nd Cl Q CI r LIeYlaT 16SArNIIA . T"Ap PINYET r NANONMA 6OWS ICA - N€AY<N{'.T"SALVO&MOM ORAMW P"GTRU MUM am aARiIOOLE1,q wit;X TiLO" INDIA H m"" q =11 CM3 •' TAACtfFLpSDl11WL1AQFIIM�[S STAR JASMN€ `. ,. ,: � d aT`:OSTAA CONGESTUL - SF"HY arROlLA •NES AUPID.OPSISVErmw '�VIRGLNA CFLT PS; - AenEIePPpAeIpLAfrp. h: FIC1rS REPENa ifteimQ Fia ` j .'� • i OROUNO COVER KURA NeUi NEEttepoom R"CLEPOINT IVY PO4Cf1TALA YERpIF SPRING CI NONEFOIL. ..,{ TURF; LARPTHON$Op' MIN+d•d lmt----r--.."� 1� F[sf+Id,urtA ��-.!>�'ukh4•tt•Pn e•nmawalk TTademarkSiTPei yr M•CITM ItN • E�•�i`1 h NORTH Amok CITY OF, PLANNING DIVIS QM �tiHtt3iT�,.�.�5CALE;.:..._:... 1 � F,A'R i :1 3 PT a �rw arrmv�.ir srrmw dcsWrAW 17-0 ' i RIf[MIt- � Rf .s��/S S�f./mil !•I ,; �� .r* t L + . SM74W.-11 SMAW-^, _ 1L tfC!l.GI CFRF?Nft�R�iWlYJ77.13 .,. 'as rrAw+m.ww AmYxmF wwY y,w+s✓.•n,nrz, RHdO�`+ Jtu y�A M I NORTH CITY OF RAINCHG CUC :MONGt. , M PLA WINC.DIZ'I5 ON EXHItuT•._, CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.MOAGA STAFF REPORT ,r *. DATE "\, January 28, 1907- 1937 `? ? TO. Chairmaw and tamers of tfie Planning Commiss{an FROM, Brad Buller, City-°rlanner,,• a BY: Scott 1400,-; Assistant�'Planner SUBJECT: DESIGN R£VIt'tit FOR MT 1QO3S -•RAMCN0 ASSOCIATES- D sign rev-erg o u . ng <eva ans"an p o oT " an'sr 35:s nle ;t family lots, on, acres in the Low Density Residential District .('2--a owel1$ 9 units per acre), located southeast;- of Red: Hill Country club, south arP Calle Corazdn - APR � 207-631-01 through 23 and 201-•641-A1 through I2. 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: Ar Action Requested: Design Revisor�aa pprovat of building elevations ar:r�{tot plans. n R. Project Density; 2.3 dwelling units per acre C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: 1 -- 1n9 .e, Faud ly es0 en °al, Lori Density Q 4 du/ac) 4 South - Vacant; General Commercial East - Railroad and vacant; Office/Professiona`,and Flood k Control ? test Townhomes Medium Density Residential (8-14 da/ac) D. General Plan Designations: 'Pr 3ec fe"_" ow uensity Residential (24 du/ac) North Low Density Residential (2-4 du/ac) South - Commercial East -_ Office, Flood Control West -- Medium Density Residential (8-14 du/ac) E. Site Characteristics: The lots are currotly vacant with slopes rang rig tuff 0% to greater than 40%. The site is within the City Designated Geology Study Area.. A geo-technical report is currently being undertaken for the project. a ITFAi.B '�' IF, _ PLAhlN � TINGt SS+I l F, BPORT T10035 RAMCHOi SOCtfES, January. 28., >dg$ �* Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: A. Background- This tract was oriiginahly approved for I, year on Plarc E„ 119Bd,. and,s0'Sequ_0tiar,grantedl any 1B.mortth extension- by the P1'ann n C' i�ss+i�or� bn Janu rx 13,, 1982. The apploieant requesteda final I6e month, extension on,.August 10,t 19aK At that time, -seueralt ooncecns were brought�'ug pertaiini`ng-ta this prodect and the, iatft was 60tinued: to; 'September 14,,E I988,, meetimrg� to allow, the applicant to,, response to� the CoMmfssfon concerns. � pp p Aparticular corsrsern to fiha� �oa�nis�iron was a �+a r�tenes� of the prgject, design= riajA, i;ve to,1'Ahe sha a and-:topography"o€ the slue;,^, Q rR{1l: its a, landform�'deest gutted as having'^,1 f ty Y wide ;tgrt fican e and pro3kects. are to, be, designed to Unikize c. alterations to the naturail Band, form according to thr 8eneral Plan and. Revelop�hent'64m., The Cowfssfon was, concerned that ' the desiSn of the subd vision proposed was more conducly (to a standard "'flat land" subdivftlon rather than the developrmeniI being designecV to fit the hiblTEs de nature of the property. Another conceal was that due tag the, severiiy of slope,` extensive cut,ihd fill of the site might subAct, the area, to potentials slope, i.lure,.. The prodeet a,pGiftant`at the time° assured the Corediss°i+on that the intent- of the subdivision was ��' for custom.ho es ifesigned` sensitive to 'he, physical constratnts of the site. As a method to insure the sensitive deve7opmen.t of the site, „ the, Commission conditioned that any proposed: development of:.the, tract would be subject to Design 'Review approval. On May 28, 1926, tyre Planning Commission approved the Design Review of Lots 36, V, and 38 within the tract. The residences incorporated the.use of split level floor plans with the garage set below the living, area.-, At that time, the Planning Commission stated the grading of lots on a individual basis should be discouraged. i B. General The applicant is proposing to develop the remaining 7573W—within the tract using seven floor plans, each with b46 elevations. The units range in size from 716,825 square feet to 2,435 square feet in area. .11 The units have been designed to conform to -the natural features of the site. The applicant has extensively studied each lot within the tract and has categorized the lots into seven ;hasic types - thus, the seven floor plans.. In all cases, the'fS6or { pl.lns are split to fit the constraints of that particulwr' I PL'INN �1G� Q AT E-"REPORT TIDOi anuaxyS —^8AlCHOaASSkTEfi• 1~e J Z18,, S'g87 PagB 01 Tot. The units, in most instances, use thd( interior walls as retairtirig walls in order to minimize the grading necessary- on the lofEi As' a result,, the only gracing proposed.iofor the, <: maJority' of the, lots will be for the building foot prints and` driveways,.. v In•,irder to meet-, the code requirement of a rear uszble yard ariia of applicant has'made use for decka areas or made use of sntall, etaining walls on the gz'ound floor 6 tie up 'J hill lats. C. 'aesT nn Review 'Committee: The Design Review Camiittee (Dave Barker,-Piter,lrt stoy,,and Dan Coleman) reviewed the project on January 8, ,1_987, and recommended', n�roval subsect to the follow tog candi,- ions: Y. Special i ndscape features should be used idithin the praae,:t stabilize the sInRes. Plant. materials selected s ould be drought tolerant, fir6 r sistant, and shNld, 'core rol erosion . In. addition, an. autoiiratic irrigation;system shg',}ld be installed on ~k the lots utilizing an romater^/tensi'ometer "ptro) device. 2. That all ';cater from roof run-off be captured acid drained• away from the residences within a:; pipe to avoid adfltional water from seeping into the slopes. III. s yCOMiMENDATION ,. Stafff recommends that the Planning Cqf�-fiission approve the a {atci.ons and plot plans through adopt;on"�Df the attached Resolution ;with conditions. Res fifu)iy s tec+, '14yr ter City�Pianner „ BB•SM:sgr I Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "C" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "D" • Building Cross Sections Exhibit "E" - Building Elevations Resolution of Approval with Conditions ;�~ C I - 4~I A jo NV bAM&& {4N.�, a' glen fill BAN RENE r �s r , b � x � Tt� f CITY OF ii{ti l�il fie tifr {{f {�.:. it tit .t1 {t}ill[ rl { Jill \ f till � t[ jif • ! i[(�t I( .,1�ti �tl# '''f t1{r a rl t rr c r i{ •{ x {I{ �,}� }{r 1F 1� 3{{:i#f r1� frr \ i{fff_,1 i it 77 `I 1 7 If f 1 y ( � '•\.Y?. }effrflxti�l}.t 1 ftxcf.�l i`{p!17.F:.O=_? +. I�i• � _ 411 ♦ i file ;,l CITY OF ULM- Zw_EICHIMT ' -`s '-/ �.-_ .. ;G1LEf IS b s r � 1 no r � e AOL 3 � i 1 CITY 01. PL.A�Ii�iG4 '[�IV +��i�^ Esc- t���tr•r`��a��►C,,E�.:�!.._ T? e r �t x VAAL CITY OF, MEN 1: ON sC DMSM F— HIMTi S;1 fs 4 4 O CITY OF.R.AN CHO,-C�.+�CA2Ma1'�'(FfA,- 91, ;$ . . ' 1 t + 10 ��( t I � 1111 Fv Its [ \l_ _ o a . \ y, N �� L SON w I •NR 4OCy 1((i ifs:: .� '�� -�� �•: r i I 7 f t d , r S lli v 1 If �I• I � �.� �4 iQ PLAM ING DRr{90N �.- II - t , E �. .,... II��II B A I ��tl1�L 11H.irh➢Y4tr�■� "�. r "i SlEik BfiPCkRul Fpl. Cl. ��. .. atgt, A P �� IAAA tI. pp � all RXlk ol `..3 tl,��. `YIAlIAAHY !J t r rnr■0� J BJ i tl 112 �f Iq1 c, r,,o a Gji � 5 t art ji'�1 �• 1111 ' �.IAO!'■' ;.plot �filf f l It� ■I'i 4tn �' Yt., y��CGCNA galr t - R■A,t 3 �11•�,,�!�'�`\•t i�yjr � } �lCl�Q6Y °.�E�dll����l. tt �r�:�i 1 f' A 1Etill .,ABC liii f i11Fe — nut r t/1 7�IlElk�llllllll�a • ,ems �� Ifl1111 07. �IU i1t VIA uu �F ll r i . �. *K +s sii Ott-� �ri - ■�iI,�I r 77}P! 1 1I�� yr- . ' aIF11r�Y.- � 1NH?►y l� qy�1 I' tYI ltrilr� ice-' t�J inn- �! {If R I ✓�1 1) r s +� • z l S. e tr OFMmamekl v 1 ®♦i �e {�- Jillll ` :> 2 > , - er I 04 I rr it w - E CITY or. Af►� Ji _ ♦® i ii !� ;;t•, .six^r.: . ,, e'1p�—r {� ra.i 6 ��� .� � i ( ` 1 .4�� � i ,� �� `.. r� � i „�. {i ��{ € _ .�� . �¢�, �:a �f f �� ,�( n ,c�;�►�+JL �,,.y � � y1 �� isr an►,l�i ���s"'��'1, .tee-µ"�-..ter � �_1 �.#r�� ��� ,�. ��f: amy�l �wJ�(t_�',µ��������� d. �'1 +� �I^�� `-i/�� F �.� 1 ��.� � .� �;�: ��« �. I� �. � ..���►��..r�t�i i � � . � . �i��► � � �� , a I, �� t.. � ,.��, ,, � (. - �� <<� -�, �. �,; ,�. ,� • "7' t it mill l li ,� (L • , i /t{ I[ + i Ilt t ed� ��,�. �1• 1i, �*fit�¢�� J l0' �'� �3�° �>,i ��►��(I L lfi ttt�Il r,pq LJ �.. - .. _ ..fit C 7`7777 ti,tt r " `4 RESOLUTIOh'k. , A RESutoflON 0! THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA�PLANNING COMMISSION i APPROVING DESIf,N REyIEW FOR TRACT N0. 10035 LOCATED.,, SOUTHCA�T OP REDHTLL, ��il]TH OF CALLE CORAZON IN THE LOW I }� DENSI`V RESIDENTIAL D,ST� tCT WHEREAS, on she 12th day of December, i9q6, a complete application % was filed by Rancho Associates for review of the abo�-described projeclq and WHEREAS, on the 28th day of January, 1987, the Rancho Cucamonga t` Planning Comission held a meeting to consider the above-described'projZtt. NOW', THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commissfon resolved as follows: y SECTION 1: That the fallowing can be met: t 1. That the propose.; project: is consistent with' the objectives of the General ,Plan; and 2. That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of;the Development Code and the purposes �• of the,;distri4t in which the site .is located; and 3. That the Proposed use is in coepliance 'with each of the applirabl'e provisions of the Development Code; and { 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions 4 applicable thereto:, will not be"detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially ti injurious to properties or 'improvements in the viciaifiy• SECTION 2:.. That Design Review for Tract 10035 is approved subject to the f617owinr conditions and attached Standard Conditions: O PLANNING DIVISION 1. Prior to the issuance of any permit (building, grading, etc.), a geo-technic study shall he reviewed and approved by the City Planner-::end the Building Official. 2. All sloped areas within the project shall Abe landscaped and irrigation. Landscape materials shall consist of those species that are `aught tolerant, fire resistant, and that control f erosion. Also, an automatic irrigation system shall be installed utilizing an irometer/tensimeter device to monitor and provide proper vi'atering. The ii _ t t PtAtd�tY+NG�D�7,,T9 TRACT 1�003a� RkINCHiI A�SOc-IATES 'F• Jandary, 28',. 119871, r Page`2 landscape and, irrig f plans sha11 be?A��viewed and approved by the Cii Planner pri'•or to the issuance of btii"1di,ng:peraftWi 3. Wood `trim or plant-ons with stucco over shall be provi+filed,around all windows. ENGINEERING DIVISION: =, I. Prior to,t6- tssuance of building,permits, a Six (6) ; foot high decorative block wa11_,r;ha1,1 be constructed on both slides of Camino kredera ,fry, Reds Hil'i Country Club,Drive and the-tract boundary. BUILDING DIVISION: I. Prior to the issuanco-of building penuits,:, the _ 4l1owing reports shall submitted for rseiaw and approval by the Buil`din'r,.._dfficial: k a. Soils. report b. Hydraulic analysis of south. opening drives c. Analysis of special found) �n designs (grade beam, caisson, etc.) for st%:,Oer Tots, 2. Prior to the issuance of building =;eFmfts, the` j following items shall" be completed to the satisfaction of the Building Official: a. Construction of approved drainage devises b. Removal of slough on railroad propert c. Corrective work on sewer access roadj,% 3. All roof drainage shall be captured and conveyed within an approved conduit or'pipe to outlet into an improved swale along the sewer access road. No.over slope or dorm slope drainage shall be permitted.from building or yard areas except within approved drainage devices. APPROVED AND ADOPTED 'THIS 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY- E. avi a_r er, a,� n -, l ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary u v:� 7RAG , i�Cg35 „FtA C, GIAES Page I, Brad, Bur,'*r Qepu v secretary of the Pltan g Commission of the, City of Rancho Cuca ong , da hereby certT*,f that the foregoin +Resoi'utton has,, duly and regularly introduced, ppt 't , end�adoptied„ by the PTsanning CoWssitois o, the City.or Rancho,C 1:'a�a,� a; a v�hgular,meeltimg of they Piranning�Eomifsiton•held on the 28th da Q'' a� ary, �982,. Iii the foT�owing��te�to-wit: TI AYES: C(}T�?issSIQNER NOM CQF�tSSTQNE,- A8 W: COMMISSIQNERSz, t t tal' "f9.��•�.,� :1"�3�y-spry..:. y •* m a L�[ A 4 J t.aN 4 4 r�� 4 wG� Olr ^q wY tl 1` LYtldG"-r�Vatl�Y GRY1. �q Rf�f$Tf��^� -rtl-RO dpNUJJ ?�,. r p,yW 6 �'V� 4�:G ami:V n � R6L 4y V tl� OF LG'.G d) Odc-la L ..no1 oN n yoR `o4 a=� i `1 4 `a�'CC.mN 0. �Z L'4\•'6T Nd� 4u�C� �vW d 4Y N ♦n�yV gG��N.s CCS y�Y Lt .•m.Lr O.26 ...VG Vtlo N.{y C3T J�d 4� d+pm � ape y{ W EV_ g Y` Y jaCm 1�c, �,3C� tl�4y m V N � t A V -6 YY0 --4 XQL 'tlfl.G WE. ggc�5.3 i SRxamQaE r'R,v cwrQau.v�3 tlk r'u [oquA� ■ C.r at. ^�' ..A wQ, rr.'e"-R,,,j '�•` ,e eRi yQ 8G.rry`{ 0.P,GWRC Zi Y0N L a i Ni NYi �QIA GA % far d�,3�a€QQ � a•F t„-,��a s as —i N i 5. b1 4G ticp .,. ILm M•�• TV 6 �yG fe V ¢4 e'11 N �. tL.my Vllt �y ^OOY'�'J. CC aiLy.0 ='•�.V Y' `GCse-- wtl F C'R iC'y ppd[ Vd�OR Y•Q �C Ntm NN O O Q>Zt6 tl V 04• u�+oQxIIi.x`� rt-`o ae', cK X t\.a ai 9-2 X; iRl ♦ W, SNLl ` sINS t. �eY. .. ac. ygticxy,T�q d o, .n v I� `� Y tlN Y tl n qQytl mow" ^ C �' •'.$ • RR ham+ '�GGdn:d. a.. � +pp Q :'„�� 'm/✓� ld r^�! �. .itY V 9�J � 4 < 6•� ll•:N'G�m� .`�V. 4R� aaa. m N r B ta TOYp CCTV p.Y YAW fl w �r�tl TOO' appi. V O Q C / tG j CY~� C6.�. �VS6I.YCNppY .+K aW ` Cy V uLC; w ;lax "' aY a xyp\ SN,aN L.rt3q'Qw V LNNY Mp ,pa-. v Q tl n"�EE NN, Os.- Gnr+=t0u� 5,Ay YN oGpq 8 � tT. 8 aVYq ..ass y1. wN N.� r`. ..b . p ccny uLpO. V«sE p.a°"r..G.Ag03.r .O TCy cpz L u NGr1^ a `VwLWL ''',�y-"N WAY Y OG.acy. a~. NM :T ^C dTyNVY'-�QQq �`yFGyy • MOV w:.0 9 .`� .p:♦ N.gN Y�y�LRaV G({~ y.aGY Yept tl REV.Vp Nra �80' C „MC ��p ^".i:�islV Y OC.CaN 'n' 4,8 3"c Y . SiAt R:r�. gCAO' gVG�g. Y+ os�' c' -�`..- $ Y.G O+W ffi -�=a C.N'YCC �ogY M.8 ,�`."'er' . 6 i 1 ,.tl.n. a— w'�FYw? T}. g. w.'.Yyc,,gi $y'i'. u:YiN."Yi $ cif aNx.oa$. yi ,c-8. $otm.&i zr �.Ni % A iao u�33. .3 sp$ =«�yn�i�uo e�pp w e��aCi<' .u{�{.� Y`ue. m`CpCp uo'o L� <QYdb CONY V+G" N..iM L=SM LY ;�vM 1_05► iLL �.s H ICLkzjl ;%z k v:1 N 1 25 �`. Tc `w'� .c-we: .<c ^Yatl.wYJa�z� a RnM vuYaNL�yY M a 2^ $ a CCtlV It ..C5-8 Np;'3 4 tVbVri s N Yi V mp �"_' aS 6 TJ .�V N`y CNCgG. gigR. CF LO��`� u G`eay O. �O Yc' ti nVA C.AS YN.La~ �C09.� <avr G. up UN �N --w vyY �� t101a���. L'YGq yNWO IS w e6t y^ � i g.� P c.C�O y arV.Aii 6Y' � >4 L 9 W` LL va S fpy V OI R== V". pDa,qV ONC 'CCC VOQM OCG tlC4 �SQ6 ;2 NC LO pG,,Y. W. `sAA�qFCC C s. � f3 n - $`cca L. c -as a ,-a-Z 4;YEZPa v ""o$ J:N °I�OLo^ii�) a o°I ,Z., 6v'c. '� Y='a'� QpQaY Nam- N^GC. LM�b i.�1yNC uVNN.r.�'Y" ~tlCC�V jM T E S T E�L9 IY ap C VM Oar G Cv�y�aTC CP G C V~tiv ^ tlt y6L.r- i.,V GC +1p 11 ]re C.v tl'O QY CY:Y^ phi^.larV V ,i FV.Otw�p^ k � p.1y Y G■■ G Z JJGG bCC N Cl� V L L a A 7Z O p t V.�,C Ll V ti L'O L L L 96Fw0 Aa aDtA> ry VQ L.YQy .�4: .LYwVi?.�` yY` G'ayM Y,y LDOQ D y O O.Y��T._•� rr N a p�C 3 M •" � �iCwQ CO a �YC Cy aiO OO qw NLwO. .CU�:� � 3lLYE ` � t $ P LRrp fl AN ^6. C yKd L+..G NC6,. ww.•..Cv Y.. E L V L A «1 Oq G BtiYG O E YP� `� � >4k[,jt�.. �! m=sty" li i, oN ca u urd mpo p,anu Tu�oo 'c+ aT 141 p'YOCC m Ny Mwd.. aT••1pLY,, r✓", US1L R � ✓ 9✓w Yry y 'r�`eg-p aaLy•g.Cp �.. CCd VIP .YL Y K V1+ ,-.NL�v.Y.Tp NV�4 OJYC-N. V-2 N�try~*'• - W,�r^" T 9,Na d a d^ •n.' ppu..W��. +AL CU a�4 J� �V� pAp'iR �IN�ApK pu py Nyx p`O d^9` 66 uYw i' �L pa`4 LCG�.y 9 Y rNa V L % aW pm >w�NN4y4.4»tea C.IG.GF_=�CLy �N �aSL Q-&--N�•'• s. .w C '0... L g$. �fiM,. 3 ETA. dmbpyCC Q �.4�6 ~Z•NlUO 4`' pp,, L'~ ^4.a0 6w pxe li yyN,ppn Q'.2..~L� YI. .♦N.iNeYC ;` q �� bl M16: ro o•-Mf. on .5-a s�ow. j{[( . yCN tyLy�•G -U. 4pn ��� ZLy wVT 4Laavn N i.l�`d Ali LLV w04.6 fCJ.'Vf� +OC T•���� ice' N p C 1 '.. tc4 22.M♦a dy ^ 4C. ail: 1 A ! N VI. r a4 Ol F.. E a&�.�1._. L a.`•F.s..i - 1 OL y. tea' •�� .^-,g q � aL'"Z-t Cyn ... it B'y 7. «Na. ACat.S an tL. ` 5 .'�`n. 4.�: ^`da`� q p�Yn d,� *CC NC D. Lw ^Vt"• T Nw� Cy •"4'.... `a Lra S is . ,!^ ,•. ga, w�. a4 N B.» `w ffX 'a. cad.. 6 sil4 . Q ... ; ^s .aiY vo ,Lea b qs ea�Na.�. a GL_C L■`} G ^N Y.V yi. cCLC :�w' C>Y>' LiCMpp$a� Yp t1 p W~C B Op T y.� p�pCa9 J4 d�L.� 0 O O CCC��a yaY6 Qtl ^ yw CC p d yydy . L VtiNTq`�. =CN p„4w B 4^ y$ ea a.. Cdd-v;. v v e « �� 04 v`. crd�m �.•BL. `�aL.L `wv�':i�.". E�O. 4 s py pN'� d,C a^it O[O' QN4'O^.H :�� gL�aft ttv'�L.pi Emi CC gyp L q� O Er �B LL adq HO L �,p5 vA�".•�a�C bb a�w �« Csw >4a Lp', 'LcN bAr•+.. K uq^rd'.L LC��.. Y6� t GyG•r � Y 6« p� YdYI�: N��■. 9µi0 ¢Hd a44 I7 u ..`4 6 w ♦+.. _ V b.B T>E O.iB.ppL, G l Y r A L i L Kam.. p 6, Lb L ; ptY CC yy ALO at yC wp p' < p <%w.ai" ? <qN H4N <W 44 rpN^w. `ppT aiN6 Wp.6'•MVtYy. �"k'R'' ,� _�.... _... "*'r'm'37+'t.,'17�r,•'"ar,�=-.WJ Sf.':Q'_,F"•._ _. _ _ �;��• 1 ..�,� � �, �Wo, r4 cW�g L4C � m'.s`u€ cc�p� i=y �..+• �� c"�,,.�'. NNE Mo "i,a�i $a ON~g G�typu.�la".t qN� rl wN 1 . ' � pGy.. y,m O. q3�S Eg� ..= AwY� `COU� M��.+14:. �y^• �M NFL } L uaS•• G 9 tpJ y Y L. .L1 a VIA"I'll �UI.O q —si � �u 21 i� u•o O, _ ." ` pA ya... 6�.rt`� Y�i.�• � ^":p/"!�y �j�IY�� :�¢C��Y M �.DEL' s�.�—= i�� . �1*vrf�aa' w�,�. � �"Y'p1yyy�� §��..�� �v•11,>y6•^�"a. N �3!'- � ~OrM4N1 3 66oy OLrO q" G �L_} �y _t".qw{+•"p�♦V". {�.LMy=y4 Y ��`. 47'i fA 1�09; HC�p ? �II ¢. ,N~` iii yy �[6a. LY.N i I� iie" Ncv _;es prwp.`. up emu aacSC L�i� �O ■��p� g L•S¢ ��¢ �va"i� NY V H CCC.N • t�y Y� C Lyj. ". "O w NC,.Y yaY OC S 29 N:� fr. fqi G y �+L Ooo L iti q�� sN L C Q T� C pC. RQ�q. O• a+q �ve 9 �A+ Np ODO.: eTV �Oi . L CCa p O �.p 4. ��M. •.. q6. g S�. �p pQL. tN efaVN O c 1 y LigL..Vvb` L WW ! y 6c Tom._ _ �.y N `� Q� '=N S \\+• �H� 4.•pi:�� { Z rt� L� p C 0.�'a L =q S.G NQ NVp F�'�' O�"p �•O V M �a L - O y pf aci L� "d rLi t1�" `• L �'12 yUL cuyy ,y Qw4 �•. N`aa.. L IY..• " "yCc �ipY � ti"'O C. y� QtNv�:. yII6 �µ.4 nM L C p �"LYS N aNOy 6C1 Ox q0. �'^p.•r p pry v `�3�qa N c."�.1ON ;•�. oc�'{ dv veco .� C.. L=II q� 2. �]•i py�wp 5��. �L�.�.. 06 yLnW p�Y4 CC p gy N N�z 0 ^ Y� " `. C p Clr=" 4', = p+ gp T.�M Y y� J♦pg Y,t"s 9: -1 ort C�g� {55 b W M •�...L V�=Y \+ t=� v'Cq dry CDp.tyy Nd y�+. NN Y�•^ �t Lf� 6 F�q�q K6� CUNT y IaiW�;iY Q7 i".•Y: �' a 4 ff �� sf r MII -: t `�' '' '.her,m;°', E�q y-' � � �= �,e`k� � `+.,•; 6 Y u O ♦ R� H If I1 �. Y M° cicu $ sip-pqa all b u a -.. i . ' w c'°,a c 1!W!p•y�4.Y� �YLaW�� N ■y�4] i a! _� 4�`' Y Q� Y � Qg'jC. 'ri7 a� ��� w� � � .N O � � IcpY•r9 M Y`.i I Y y L Y... Y� 3 N � 7Gw C 1.i O ,) IM liY .1(OY UOO�y +jjj� dl `I. Q.riv Cm Q9w.' Y. aa: .Q C Ni�': YQG L6t�616 it Y + L •mac g NCC Y N� C�=^ w �.. .m4a pLY. .0 dn ..yY 2' ii wz. LQrO tV ~ Oyu = C00 KQvm �CYN OY � a ram •_'� L L b OY r,` u M YCN� �;O'C 06`�@/•Y oo �N fJtB ° iA ..b. Q1Oa YY .! Ny YLl �..P V�'6Y Bw BO KO.V �D•CS � y. H r NI 141 31 R . ter.. "r �� .on. 9 �e�`� —AXIS, 410.� 'C • �rW C CLOY rN. {rK ,.." ju �.n.R, t. Y y O $e ec Q�rr n ex�' aal`Y.. \ QYa Cagg .�ffi � f( ��•'N yypa',�..f p � ,Y'�i �� ,�`:V €` ` wY G, ICr3'i�� :¢ F y'� C+n� � f Yr.o t. s un'e .. oow E'enizz ,u £ a® � N'F 1 ri ,veCl � my a3j; <6 um u+u re aC c; E. a e� S� -S Rl Y Z' a y aNco' x«. 4V 9r(0 ro CppC,,�C�e 5q lY , Y a N G Lq G CyOZ uq py3 C '71 iLV. WY C 49 .0�. Y tJ. fJrm O tQ f� NnLt N.�. <GW':/ d.. 1 b •ry {I ♦, - et f1 i t � aYyb V^p^ ,t .♦b ^ C Y4 Y 4 yYnY4•. 8 8q b' Y N SOc' 4 LMy � r �N 2S. q :. ILI- yu=` a a'o. Ate r Y 3 N fp�-� i N Y L CO.c NO �C 17'►A N O ^:VQ ^O•C>..�- NZ�. C�YL COS �i '�� 4C p nK � O Y Y 1� Otf♦ O O L Y QM p ^p - �. *® n^ 6I 6w.�w. �> > Y6 -C o � CI'1'X OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA j�wcanro STAFF REPORT s DATE: January 28, 1987 1977 TO Chairman and Members of the Running Commission { 1�? FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner w, By:` Nancy Fang, Associate Planner " SUBJECT- DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATFYE TRACT 12969�MAZE IJD AN,- The review o two new a.eva ions and floor plans (Plan A2 and B2), to replace the approved'Platt A and Plan B for 20 lots of the total 26 Tcts, in . a Low-Kedium Residential District, 4-8 dwelling unitsfacre, Tocated on the south side of Arrow Highway and at Edwin Street - APN: 207-222 8. r I. PROJECT A!VI SITE DESCRIPTION: A. c ion_ eques e : Review of revis9d site plan and building elevations for a portion of a previouslyy ,approved total development residential subdivision. I1. ANALYSIS:) W. neral: On July 10, 1985, the Planning Commissfon conditionally approved Tentative Tract 12969 as a total development package, incruding the subdivision, map, grading plan, landscape plan, and building elevations. The four approved house plans and unit sizes are as follows: Plan A - 1 story, 1590 square feet Plan B I story, 1576 square feet i Plan C - 2 story, 1605 square feet { Plan D - 2' story duplex, 1431 square feet for each unit: The developer is proposing to revise the floor plan and elevations for Plan A of 1590 square feet to Plan A2 of 1335 square feet, and Plan B of 1575 square feet•to;`Plan 82 of 1335 square feet as shown in Exhibits G and,H and Exhibits K and L. The developer stated tht the 'reason for the reduced unit size is based on a market study, which indie�tes that this affordable price range around this area is about $90,0002 ITEM C ` 0 8O8 REPORT `t1'}7�2`96�' �fA�F�i�lL44?it � yTaR,Gary g$rt 1's48� Parse-,2 ` �x y �; B. �lZiesi, Re�rdea� O'Qhm'fcte� �, Te Deszigna Review=Cos Ai Bra an Dave, a 8 tee G' r�ker� d. dfu 1l� ) i^nii ia�lOf reviewed 'ttie ori'g�anail" phdposed redt;ct.zn of } unit— s fx of PIans,At and a, iahomi 169M cquarei feet.to�1189, craare-',feet onxN6vember-70, The Sbmaittep :dnd•not} f recommends approv,4* wiO`.'the=Wort corcerns that the unit Q stle- proposed was: tm swliT whiih ereaftd a "boxy,` appearaq;eT vti�tH'the ga►aage doati:nati.09"then street, scene,.. The dev-Top6im' has subm fitted revised. .Mahpp�y address the above conperc s.. The rev4issedF f1 oor. pilWns proposed,havei a better, spatirah eeift,01d8.541*0 vbtwe'eng Oil' the roomsz., The developer, alcsoE proposed" to`'mikfigate the gar, 5 dominance •� through the foT1ing, 1. Tfeeper variation in building,, setback aiang, t��bain Street. =2. ,Additional landscapi>�5i providedin- addition to.,,the,reoutred,froriiiyard land"scaping. " 3. Upgrading; the bulldfn For Plan , A2' and. 82 with ad +tionat /,&rchftectura�il detatli�ng such as woa��` arias;; stucco aver, entry columns, ireplact, and vents.' The Oesign,4-Review Committee Woe Barker and Peter Toistoyi revfiewed these revised plans cn Dkember 18, 1986 and recommnded approval' with the allowing ` conditions: 1. Five foot side yard shall be provided to G lots 3, 9, 16, and 24-. (Revis,;d'as shams in Exhibit 1). 2. The floor plans for Plan,12 and 82 shall be revised where the fard.-,,y room should be changed to a bedroom,',-the bedroom across from the family room should be changed to a kitchen area, and the kiiklhen area being changed to a &rang room. (Revised as shoe in Exhibit 0. PL`AM 16�COiIN 4ST, ' 'SiAF REPORT a. TT12969 - 'YAZEOJrIAti ` January 28 1987 Page 3 3, The applicant shall mitigate the concern of garage, scape, .py providing front yard landscaping, that dxceeds the minimum requirement to the satisfaction Lf the City :p t Planner (a�lditional ,des, shrubs,';ground ' cover and appropriate irrigi►tioh'). 7 i;ondiomi as state:in VW Resolaii�c►n)„ ,t 1I1. 'ACTS FOR FINDINGS The proposed, revisions to th' fYoor plans and el.e4iibns:for.Plan A and B_are consistent with: the objectives.`'for the='General Plan and. the Development Ccde . The_prflptisia use is in o%apli�lnce with each le of the applicab revisions of :the Development Code and all other City standards, The proposed project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties, or cause significant adverse environmental impacts. ` IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Design Review for this Tentative Tract 12969 through adoption of the + attached Resolution. TM "Pies gall itt Brad B ler t City Planner BB:NF:te - Attachments: Exhibit"A" Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "C" Approved Tentative Tract Exhibit "On — Approved Site Plan Exhibit "E" - Approved Grading Plan Exhibit "F" - Approved Landscape Plan Exhibit "G" - Approved Elevations Exhibit "N" - Approved Floor Plan Exhibit "I" - Proposed' Re-ised Site.Plan t Exhibit "J" - Proposed' Revised Landscape Plan Exhibit "K" - Proposed Revised Elevations for Plan A2 and 82 Exhibit "L" - Proposed Revised Floor;for P,an A2 and 02 Resolution No. 85-100 1 Resolution of Approval with Conditions `® � � aors■ r r C � Ifs ��.y f� `-ear•'3 y1 =� - A-CItY Off aAecYo c{ AMMMA CWJXW DP.®AN-N6iNARO M. DRAV OF,'� i11t4 - tuws��,f.�'�4 Aa.�rrt.na Rdn9 e�.n.wiOF Li NJ- i CL3,CAMQN-CA J i s. �i• ♦re vaa ' rev a. _r •: •IRp � p r y y r.• 1, ®lays a p • s 3 • 14TORI f•I I?, e�y. r :f nww wi CA Coal t.. ,.. •; t C� �J _ 14n�ATFd PLANNM DW SIN „ �-ALE, C° -6 1' 4 !Q 80Tlai$11 UXITW' 4078 At*. rn. �an 1t13. rAu, i e"a ( ; 711" 1 t Altnow ' Z �..� N 'MAR >rQ 4''�'��+"• t 1�L� t�i� , s _ � v - 1 4IJ _Us ,5 7 .0 •��7 r--, lu � 1 .`�� 1 RFd:f � -f' ��-f � j. f",f' '•, is ley 'I CUY OF RAMID C Gam. a ...., ell , 4 ' ? C`9 r� a lot] PIN Gi g jor k X+ � OnR s� 4 J. • u OW RT. k � rll lit � � e �1 a i LL-rlill, f s: ti; 'aawas, tll Itl aymer" ' a k {ice ill c �KK �h r 1 1 11 131 NORni *4 PL kNNUN G DIVEM y .JfeWi!.Nrr`Nlt,itla�r � .ry. MZ [ I �� p Y4 �� `Jyr4 t i per^ r • rT MY CF �► s C / F P F.� I +. ti c� Y �g S % .. d r _ Fr ursp. an uv n 3F��t�uc' UN I_r E7 0 U IpS�'E E i ' a 1 Oi 1 vm a yr r ji 1 las H art uv u - an w xw ino ( 1 1- t lus aTY OF ILI Tr kA r' {.----_...r sT'k�orl� cttaoNG t•'Lla,ol t c r-�.r, r� z» x.�i� fit,..-s , �^.{E �i''a. �,aq`k�• r- 19 PAW RM 4 M - Zr cn-YOF r - -T = . ._. D (A)CA , MANNIM WASM t + j h � �. AdAL ..i fi 1k PLANNENG M .fw•fT I ` 'i1 1 3t��. l(�t�• 11t' �l�l SE�U 1 as» �``�II+• g lye • t f 1' •r '� 'y t {. � r _ • f� i AWL tj .40 r _ t.• 1. aw d •� �� __ tip. �'� � ' { izr- TI ; I bars rra.� � t Id L as r- P6_+N 1 s r s rT T. rru: y 1 0 Aft VAX,; �. .�� t t _AUL -.�.--L rA LA OF 9. K 19ih:f aa+ •f.'!'ty..t{fE.= 51:=:.151.?t k t f a Avgq ��7����������[�pj^''�� ��r �+ rA 3, � l-L+1S1 V iilil^lti.T �d0.J1'k L�` A4`. � sscm►- _ RESOLUTION N0:` 85-100 �✓ A RESOLUTION OF:THE PLANNING OMhS3SSi0id OF T ��c CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGii;,.CALIFORNIA, 0001TTONALL APP��VING THE _ 5x6DIVISItIN RN43 tlESiGN REVIEW FOR TENTAT?VE�tTRAC7 MAP N0. J1 n \\ WHEREAS, T, otative Tract Map No. 12969, her nafter "Map" submitted by,Hagop &-Yegia K. YazedJian, applicant, for the purse- of subdiv,idin'g the real prop rty situated in the�City of Rancho Cucamonga,, County of San Bernardino, State of California, ,described,A"s'a total- residential development ' and subdivisior. of 4.38 acres into 26 lots With'a total of 28 units, regularly z came before the Plann.-ng Commission for public hearing and action on July 16, 1985, and 'lu WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the ,Map subject to all conditions- set forth in the Engineering. and Planning Division's ,,J} reports; and WFC;TEAS., the Planning Commis,,ion has read and considered the Engineering'`and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence r, presented at the public hearing. .NOW,. THERE-IRE, the' Planning Comm-d'sion of the City of Rancho Cocamonou does resilve as follows; Aft SECTION 1: The Planning.Commission makes the following findings ini regard toTE ntat.ive Tract No. 12969 and the Map thereof: (a) the tentative tract is consistent-1 with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is cinsistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and-,specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of. development; ropose+:; ,d) The design of the subdivision is 'tot likely to cause substantial environmental damage and a,aidable injury to humans and wildl?fe or their habitat; (e) The tentative trdet is not likely to cause seriousz;_ public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will aot conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, ,for access through or use df the property within't" proposed subdivision'. l Resolution No. Tentative Tract 129,6L .. Yazedjian Page f ( ) That this project will not create adversefirrpscts on the environment and a Nagative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Track Map No. 1296(1, a copy of Which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all cf the fallowing conditions �Ir and the attached Standard Conditions: i DESIGN REVIEW The roof pitch for the duplex buildings shall be revised to a full hits or gable end. 2. Existing healthy mature trees:shall be preserved wherever possitxle. Selective Memoval of trees is permitted as required by construction pursuant to a Tree Removal 5 Permit, All trees to be saved shall be enclosed 'by a chain lirk fence prior to the issuance of any yruding or building permit and prior to commencement of construction. 3. Any trees removed stall be replaced at a rate of 2 to 1 ! end shall be of 25 gallon size. � ENGINEERING OI1; I�.C-, 1. A hydravlic study shal7 be required and shall be submitted with the final grading plan for review and approval prior to issuance of any grading permits. APPROVED AND ADO F FO THIS 10th DAY OF ,IULY, 1985. PLANNI SSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- r� Dennis. ` ut fja : .an i ATTEST: ... .,_, �.. Ri' Cam Oeput�-Secretary ?, Ric Gomez Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of tha City of Rancho rucamdnga, do hereby 4ertify that the foregoingResolution was,dul+ and 3 regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by'the °fanning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission Feld on the 10th dhy`of July, 198E, by the followlIng vote-to-wit: ' AYES: 4 CbMMTSSIONE4S:= REMPEL, MCNIEL, SM, T NOES: ti COMMISSIO ERS: NONE . ABSERTCOMMSSI li!E: COM S: BARKERS NITIEA tt g ° w m 3 arY;—Y Ot'x urn An x q�11 14nM c c•ap Q' -«,_ `{ � aN Y 4 Cl(�i YW of F. pEF Mr yOL ��) y�v x. QOO�O:T Cqy nl.w- :ma`tc 6n w ,O^...:�nF, tsm 06 E'�y ALi * Hm'•>U YN,tG O.��Qn �yG ax o.�g j II�u�.. 44 VCm �rx �rY `UO7u c Q r•L4 �s y l p Z m.�r�c�p.S� �c.� -:o� Y boa p�coQ •+µmc ca��m� Y '\. UmKi LL CI u U O m V O m�b 4•m Y 6 q C Y. :Pr Hn^y. �pal�w ?6v �'tl ~�CmY cpm p••C¢C.�a C'Q` �iLO m�'YH mK�.CY O..CS �_ bpL q.,H.Y 6V v iD�• '4."C'F.':YaN. f m43 A '? T� Cp ^q TLA qmC mGG lHJ� 'tE � Is- ^4% I- Qy� C� ^. L�>Q. � � .. iz $mu c d « wm Ewa c p.ar. Cn �u:o c X^ mom. uvt wu: �uu m�� YCyy1 NCL4 C>y6 O d rH pap CO:^Y ( Br T"V A.69Zxn)..AYr O pFH 6YN KN�a1..s.P.. S OOM Y�lnOL Afi Y Y. y Y • H rCy �9Lmw CMO:.a a n '. ncp a a,N ep c,FhY 21 Q Gxr 11.i l xyyp J NTCY '6 S b �q .pi�u am�r•..wu Otty zer^.=.. " n �.. n.c 4 a um��'� ' C)y o x.a .N Iq1 xQ t! •;I iJ c e�uy 1 hOPc Ca TU �u`.� iY L �'J� SA y _ 6 IiO C O 4 y � { N�q d n • b.. LO E p.r7 Zia� �f,,((f��o.N.Qa µp... =' .� 6Yr. CY.� Oy ^Y6Yun rOy=.9^.E4q Y 'L=U µ G0 . �. • L E.= t '••y U��s'ttb Y C-y y $L a:�T i M G 'by C^ QtUCj x V ti d. �j µ_L ,� Y�YCL `Lµ Orb MM i Lam^ N'Cy awN• �9 p O � ulpL ,r•..3 01 �.b LE TI��L bj6 i w 6= b�•dC �.N••' a ^aW. t �L 1 dd P,LNQ yNY.� L.tF� y~�JJyyy •a•SG4 Y�r. �..=T �.. Cb M .c 4 Q�01, Y`t lz X •n'. C b O. �M�:u'cs G..•.L �C��y�,4N ^:'T Y +�6�� NT v L $L UUC C• �GO.G C' �A yNb��.N T[N�p� �•L�G�10 O1Q T O.3U YL O.r=aNS. N� dO Y pa e a CL� N Y..Y'4 dG•.4 1 y� 4 0.4; d µ u p D y ap .3r pg�L 6! Gp 4q �OaO.�L�i�Y.wW. C9CN S.qO ayBjY q0 q�6. SY�. N=W gg. •4 b�.� �.. Yd+ t UYC rC.'Y t4 CS..• uS.: TN 4 Yq Y DUayg �rv�i iUr 2�patw•t L^aN N� UGACW. 0.N .MUS��L.' ��L� r^.. aAp� i C.M.a• r A'CV Yly. alit 4aia�.W v�� T'O,Q.QQ YLyw a� CYw..g6 GG gg YL i N ®S µ J Al, OX�r•.C 'P C N D•GC3C�R -.rA . ®py= i QV U. rA.y F6i�r�0 Al,4. _ VCGti14^ bCG�. 4G .OQG 4fW ST'tY.7L Z:•FlYtdi C it 4a•�YrsN V��p, CC.v..' YV ^• P nrd� l R�0.6 OL MAY Y�^ 4f yy�� Yy O pp ^f. O �Lv� P'IT6O IFEF R� ,',; I wer Y .^o. = tt 'pp •Y 5YGgy4 aY' a 'm L a LN= CL.yY �dbS tt tl r Ld.La$'y o $.a..N.a b��'•'+u 20 ge r � �N .L++i 'wLL $o� YaaQ „'L�G.•_ O ? a s o,ea"uo. C iba ,.ats>.Y:a- • 6 O CT•. Y. Y; .iGCµL VOCG+bi@@ . Lt `•¢p S! a Sy y. a=^ ►•aaru tea'.. a «� ru-m`a Jam. c c� .+onn =,aN 4L Y+ `'c..L. °� Ner ¢ �n c ^.a..cu.., cK • S�^tea: asEa p.v-..c U µ WE b. b r 4 q. y^ Q L. S D.. L R C.�.N L 4�> t•'C S. < L,^9 N „ ♦v • L .r.. C i C Y p ; 4Y r T, L F I a I� ^.9 S Y'^Ay ZZ4 � r 'C .d CC L^iL C F�A:ay•• d Yny �i t•y. a. � Y Y O. � C~ r 9 a G V L... L i!. g p V , t4 p L �S3U OI FG uQ�b ab .•. C$y L.:q 1L L ere b L a C Ef V?'gLC 4M.�^'��'•'.. C b ^.U QyN.d Vp q= GM. Cp r^ DLO NU 'ZRY y-u Q3 v1n raw 6T. .bn o�a�a. D�aL ^4 C�yLgd~QyyOO r oy a Y bat ��b a. Pc -Hat.? T cL `- v `s n a G `Da a.L: 'M'.'•L' Geb P- slaw ross.ab A L Y Eb !. L1 O.s Cd_ y O 01 d _ 36ifb C� LYYUba LCp4.•t�L n a C 1 ago nta. ..i f-:cNGn «.Yna in�s.a su .�a.a n.a'q�.Gi r...x Ncw r--v+cwn - 1 �I ..o y oz gUY'0y O~ �.6' 04'� UO VUC ENO i �610� w��0 � Y' b � q Y �i.•L..d nd.Y} U > L N ^`u nC at: tj Q •� q c� Q1 U'. n uY•-a ta� '�'' m „'a L� �e. s o u.,�'n-yY G w b o�-c.. oboQ Low/,}uc ,c<�R Ay o^N.- GNV v�. , NL�CM,� Nd y�'�„` h. ybti..ON yam.�' 'C7 VU U`.O.O Jm6N,� IE��y Gq M •L w Gdi! GOOLQ�b KbNn��. �Laii Neo wu L0.. 1A^. ,� OVA- 67O �.�4vd4�.^.•�ayYl,w. Gbyy N1r:. eyujM^..c4c y O G C L O rxl U q2` A0 c,L1.0 6Y CggO G Or. O L b'd.UI 4�r 6 �T fO GON �N Y YGY�. NV L AG4 y�^,s,uG Fo bgnr.`.t• �G 6V 6 L O Gyb �o Moa s.vau.racay CwC b E u _N� 6 q O G Y wt•>•�y ^b C w L Y_, Nq.uF 6N^ Ga y..4n 0, /��L ANY^�O.T.G�:H 00 iw�Yy y u.d 00. s 090N v6 s•ad uubw ec au �. °'�o� mCO1.. �.�.a coLa r�'m O H.29 C• O6 U Ua. v ,•• 4 N .,�. ��no. �y U^41 u z A qyd ..CO aqua G ev M ib4 n.` >O MU.p aO.�y s{� O�b 4bT. LE w w ¢s _ O�e Rt. a �.. G Y 66 „b wy. 'bL N �♦V•„C uu Pe:; tYUa. 0 Gb qy LO_ t L �o T L Z..G. C� aN q nyGp O.G`^N 79 - CYO.O Ne LdAy T~Oty E > to Gqa c ba aw. a . 0 9� nu w.0 Y su ma uN.0 na4nw oao.� i u .. bar. ►E .. c„.5u O N u� C ..q V q L �>. c Y O L �C• U.�� O C q 4 O, ttn0 6wW.m > 6bM F`GN 6Y C9 1=0vOi+Cq Q06 N t4Ln 6Y1 66MN�� ^ g J _NA c, JI 4?I7 N 1 r y@ g ep p ��=! 4mg �C.WC.°� �L�0i u p9:-n f1 VfLR IO L.= C p y • a^'! V Y p r 4 Y b^_ w y. � Cj V'7. \ C q'�,.Y u V d�y V 9N 4 @@J wryp cN�lt/ a N9,u O�YZ N�GO <_� i40 12 ywN ndlii.'i L »y J/6UCYL A+ydCC i a4 UM r Q` W'N 51 y f ro U u Y Y g = a.O V= F L A 9 Y µ f O d S ��^wM tt A.y 3 �C hN Ya+CYMY.. �4Ab pY y Ww . Wg ` U MSC a j�0 �tJ - dydY f~i+ q0 Y.Y+YO Ksb4.l U��V uaC, aV®Cya+CYC.'Oi J yypoy� ORL O 'jiyf��y 9 A bv: jStl '� U� Y w..ai t a Y b.✓ Y 4'r yN it � Cd xG. AOY- y 4 Y USoS a "t` YaYU. a 19 N p Ss �, �• N 6,Nq v...� YaOCa.,. N4.i y .At4TY fiG µy b My ' tG UU� � V d^ i1 ��..d�fl. L 9T �W C.CSf G^ YjScti..a ^y uGp �w rnn'Lp p� Q 4, V �Y . !` E LQU OyY tlx AN ib 0 ndM. LT `_pA N.. JY6s Y Y a Y:> q0d U Lqk wy,` s G U4ua ^yl�yM4tyu �pb^ggpp4A y V `L.4^. Hi�A ^ N WL 1 O,pfyR -18 AO.0 N OY . zz- 2-5 cLL vOen $ue. p 29 N6 YN ,ra c. Vv �,..;n A N j { ~y N Y w4G Y Y9.r N T. p Y q U a .�'^Q.• ^ �.1C N ✓tyt U, ¢�L nCD1 p 0 1N Y. qC Cj o R"'V L.Y • E A-E La y Y�.P n�.a �.L.r 4 C L C .,. Wp . i Lo:Ln. �iQ�. T 2 N l U yy.. A. Y`w. L• r i n. N N A L - � .4 cY^ " 9 is •{` �wn� lea ^m m.,�.�.,,. p TNane'iAN.at �d CT' b n qW LtuQ N e r O Y Cq. >t Nj.r a nY - Y�� C C 4Q 9 ZO ^YL4 r Nj � ��r ij�Q VY V �C.yj. .r. aC G.�'V t Vq yam - C.., wU yryL 9 D}C T YS� 9A.BV C' �U A.p pC^d L � O^F \i y R N@,p�Y.. i 2 O j C ^AD W aAN _ w O y YCC p O A' prp V tl Y S L+f W yw 1a' W9 CUY .� w GG^ U4 Yg {gOpi Lw �. a w p pN J n w -V 4 t w G O• //�C N N p, n „� G q~CCV N h• O sg o a _ HE o'w. � It gw YYi �'� $h..a 41 4r. L .G Q A p C � �v• �Jf" il. ��> o,•�aa,`T �`�"" ffi.�� ."'i `t'� a �`'� = S adv yG' �nA-, Nyry 4.NY L ,w Y". ♦ 4 GN A N '9='W Bib �t�' iw yG �yLH 'p� Ary �i Q` ► M U f �� 4V.« y � pY� a a ru.` A "S N!ia oq.�• y, t L t A r_ p bq L O M F`z 3 a s 'OwJ nr.G t•b C V�b�0` Y+•i '{{ S G d4 �d pO tt N�3�u P" COu O.mq C_,,> L>+p'N Vd iQ ar j ry R a pyv�-u 6f4 4u0 +>T w s0..-v.. G r � V1 1� , LC aN*•i:� n �. :Iti'.0 l`G. Cp._. "� "Of. G• ^. "0y6 "A 4QN 8.4 w �W p. M vCyC G 9� pu�{'�•� Y� pp v ;Oy y ^G G VYw V....•^ L�nVdG yY pg4 `q.. qGi> >.� o... o:'t pL Ul yg u a 7L uo vo "y e' $ rII u' n •a# a Va " Y 1c L@NO.. o p R K OY ~b• "a! ny t NK aN G "w �� ` Gb�yp,N q" K N"OAq -C ?.b GV' T R p 4�y, p N Boyyp�Y .n`w pCp 6"'Ir.«V .t•._ Vuo'" a� �E s" :. q{. .� �r.�,+o•y 'o�,q� �9aoa N pi ti \ i"i q0 Ld 6g. �. 4pCo z {'s,� y'o O.�yp m "GOL> t% aM Yp'J w J C s.l. SL:O HL i ..•.L C LJ "G'' '�q`S L'�Q. bbO6�. CCV bO� a, dD o a p V n L�•i d 4 C ,+ � �"%� n p N " .P.^ ��~� QYYb?,�� N N'6'p bN �� Nil Iz 14 a Y y'.N VOY 44gQ Oar'.. a O V N"qAh S-H H. �'6. .Da 62 @� 'KA lDiu tiQ C w. y y } ot 2 x• L �l^• �^ b a�,w M A � ���d ++V `a�i' µ tint a y O 1 w » � �gp i ril N. y d YaCi. 4.3 b0�y![.��! Mp` C®n�n per' LC 'i�T�.� .k Y i4 aa• 4 dYfVr■ G$ OCJC 4 ww 4S �O d RV 4 OG u•p..F pw-:* ti 0. Cp��YOrL1y:L+pS.•�...„C44.I'Ow' y`O 4b '^!�Y♦� `'L{Y_�VM rV r Spg0 uR djaOw1uN VY #oY Zb' • as uoo,K.y rg� �a..3 d y'uSr'. +�, • � oo� '°cR`ix �" f ...ICI a1aFY•� ppyyaa�� h SL p p~ .a{fi Og V p R xQ's y"toN yy 4.V1aLy ip� L' 4y 4\4;: 1G.R �'11 Y-.J.z. Piz aywu v~rA ! F�a»f.. a+� .�c... aL yY-.dc :o. .. > SIX .� vr¢wE.rf.-.a O T7 5- MC C eday �o iip L4 Ste �G g�bF�• �V � N.a N.. ai �u.A .. ng i r E 4 , ^ a i_. � �t�"'8 oa `i h� � n c e ._e • n_c.. a°t �'� c m moo. mc" a d 4°' �a" ' 44 "'1: J:q 01 o f o w•.'.'cm.. mw cu _ `M^ J Q v u 'rna'o'.. S.r nN —Zy. M . vz up h N 4q y g A IRZ GL O N - m 6 @ � A Y LL.L �s mn SL G A�d� A I O u m.. o vco ofa. na `s.� .r 3 Q.Q Q 6O� I4.q L awlRR.. �. aon ue a A dOh 9G0 uN� r ww.-a'r <sa ii... i RESOLUTION NO0 A RIESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING `DESIGNS "REV(IEW FOR REVISED SITE PLAN AND ELEVATIONS FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 12969, LOCATED AT THE s SOUTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE, AND AT EDWIN STREET. VHEREAS, on the loth day of October, 08d. complete application was filed by for review of the above-described pra ,.and Vi'IE wE on the -28th day. of January'; 1987, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission1field a meeting to consider the above-described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: _ SECTION 1: Thal the followtig can be met: 1.` That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and j = 2. That the proposed use is in ,accord with the objp:;tive of the Development Code and the purposes of'Che district-in which the site ft,,located; and �. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and �l. That theproposed use, together with the conditions appiY,,SAble thereto, .will not be detrimental to the r� public health, safety, or welfare, or,materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That Design R,,view for Tentative Tract 12969 is kaproved subject to e o oror;:g conditions and attached Standard Conditions: 1. All pertinent conditions contained in Resolution ,No. 85-100 shall' apply. 2. Front yard landscaping with appropriate irrigation exceeding the minimum Ci'ty's requirement shall be provided to all the Lots' within this tract, to the satisfaction of the City Planner and prior to issuance of building permits. Ibis required front yard landscaping is in addition to the required tree replacement based on Tree. Removal Permit 86-49. 3. Revised, detailed grading plan incorporating the new Plan A2 and 82 shall be submitted for Grading Committee review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. .r r Pt� i� i 0NO. ) January 28; 198 7- Page 2 t � 4. reveroper shill Install rear and side .ya`rd fencing. Detains shai.l be o6lfgwed and, approved by the ;City Planner 'prior to issuance�,of bull di�ngE perm ts.. APPROVED AND AD4)P'lED THIS.28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1987. , r f; PLANNING COMMISSION OF CITY W RANCHO:CUCANit}IEGA, BY: L.a: David Barkerj Chlaimn ATTEST: --Brad Buller, epu.y eer_e ry a Y I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary. .of the Planning Commission.'of the City of Rancho Cucamonga;do hereby certify that.the foregoing.Retbluttion was ldoy and regularly introduced, passed, and,adopted, by th Planning Gbt+ani°ssion.'o€.tits 1 City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Com�ission held on the 28th day.of January, 198T.,by the following vote,-to-wit: 1 AYES: COW4ISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS. CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT t r., 0 O V ? DATE: Jaaui" 28, 1987 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY. Bruce Cook, Associate Planner SUBJECT: COMMUNITY TRAIT. FENCING - TRAILS COMMITTEE The revision nrr Equestrian rail tan, ar iJ.wawi'ng -#1010 regarding community Trail fencing, changing the required fencing material'"from extruded concrete to PVC. I. BACKGROUhnD. On October 17, 1986 the Trails Committee completed their review and analysis of alternative trail fencing to replace the required extrud d concrete fencing. The Committee over 10 monVW reviewed numerous alternatives including PVC pipe, fart Oboard, wood,_aluminum, and concrete. Their review included fief : trips to actual installation sites and meeting with product manufzcturers. Aftsr thorough analf s, the Trails 'Committee has determine43 that PVC would offer the!$est altenrative in terms of cast, ease.'of installation, ease of djontenance, and safety. + II. RECOMMENDATION: The Trails Committed recommends that the Planning E+ Commission diroct staff to revise Equestrian Trail Standard Drawing #1010 to show co;imunity trail fencing as PVC. Resltfuity s itlEed, Brad Buller City Planner BB BC:vc Attachments: Revised Standard Drawing #101 i,Yd Standard Drawing #1010 Manufacturer's Brochure for PVC pipe r` ENAll L EMD t 1�- E_j MOONING 13W T 1p,�Tt;lez'r AHD AWE We, f—<;M L h,k= AF 1 Q OR Pima, 111" 1V1b�..=�s y L. °vi MINIMUM 10 PVC y� ply t.» f �t'1'S`` t'VG PST G L MST l 2 11�1 00, �i�Jf�' PYG PAST s� � 1 i f�iMC�t✓a tt � &a SAS+2.1.,s1 ATF, 4:10ST5 AAVLr— Ta P1t.Llr—� W171+ Co1�IGz�T�.r � .hNt� l�f� -f'D }�}-�1f� Gai�1G•. T11��tS, 3 'CiA!Y. WIV WAslal ) NUI-5. Ak< ' 5" �t or- A a�I s, GAsf' r' L•!��'G+ST'?a �= �175 ci< E�P05�b, �VS. r -low• •'. MOOMPOT :s 'eta _ city of rancho Cucamonga STANDARD DRAWING O.C. -(Yr '7° I!'1 c' yy '4- lealw PLAN I L ALL MEMOeF6 SHALL M FMCAtM CONE'WrP- t, KON7UGk^�MAJ L18 MWE n AVAJLA0 _- p1roM MAJ_To CaVX U o Al.. Z.MSS -SKALL L-�r_ Hi-ft(,Y cowqw OF �LNVALZ�(Woffa Co�1C). Nw Y 3• CPiA;4M'IM UrJEAJ.L piper-Tlom ✓HALL SP-Ru!!-M- TWD I'e?S Sim e�YSIDE.. Flu= W MMMM AND -r�crulzr FIN15H M .Ior- To rtgK'r"NC9. " I *4 uy 4 95ECTI ON Y j =is EXTRUDED CONCRETE FENCE: i T 10 �� €x OMiR UNITY TRINE �d �* 4 a a r � k e. e 4 5 'Ia ntena°nee ee Aiternat iOn -1 White �I fSeatl + , Never xlieeds Poi►t;?"'�1'ili Eliot Decay Cos EffectivE ;,Tt�ugfi,Dur hle;Pti e ' r .. Yersatite Deli :.ILcrses Won't' hew TM 0 JNTRY E SINTE F E N C E I Maintenance-Free Veratility Safety Country Estate combines the Country Estate fencing is Rugf 'VC has shown to be a traditional beauty of white rail available in any number of safe alten._. 'e to wood or fencing with the proven advantages simple-to-install rail designs. wire-type fence...horses won't of durable PVC(polyvinyl Standard 2"x 6"rails are 16 feet crib.CountiyEstate reduces the chloride).Unlike wood or pipe long,and can be matched with danger of injury from splintering, fence,Country Estate will notchip, square or round posts.You get the cracking or cutting.You get added crack,rot,rust or peel...and it look you want.Country Estate is strength,safety and protection of never needs paint!You'll enjoy perfect around the ianch,home, your investment. lasting beauty year after year,while swimming pool,recreation area... saving valuable time and money on wh zxever fence is used. maintenance. Standard Specifications(specw wv is also available) Rem TxW Length Rem TxW Fence flails 2"x6 76W&16' Fence Post Cap 4'X4" 5"x5" Square Fend Posts 4"x4" —6,T,8 Fence Post Bracket 5"x5" —7,6' Bracket Stock U-Channel 27 Fence Post Flange Mtrib.ted by: Ii %S7 T Y P.O.Box 1268ATSan Juan CapistranoCalifornia 92693C43,,Inc. 661.2237 •country estate Fence U a haaemark of Nebtuka Plastics,in. �\ / U' p m x CITY OF'RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPOT _ . ,r �c a• )f E� ;Z UOATE: January , 1957 isn TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM. Brad,Bu l'er, City Planner ' BY Nand Fong, Associate. Rlannpr SUBJECT: PARCEL MAP 5786 A M IFICATIK --ZRONELL BROTHERS" The request 7to,a.1 Ana e a condition c ,approvalrequ,ring the instalhatiran of`a six (6� foot'";h1'96 masonry. 'wall and additional landscaping ailong 'the taut. boundary line for an approved office pa," svbdivfsion located, at the southeast•coener,of Base Line Road and Carnelian Street - . APR 207421-28. I. ABSTRACT: The purpose of this report is for . the Planning isslon.' to consider modifying the conditions of; apprg . as; described above. II, ANALYSIS: � A. Background: The Planning Commission on Decerbpi�,10, 1986 regu.ar meeting reviewed the proposed req►. si of the applicant to eliminate conditions 13 h 14 of Parcel_Map 5786. as shown on Page 5 of Resotutton No. 84-50. `''The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and. c�'.%risidered public input from the adjacent property owner and directed staff and applicant to work together to provide an adequate masonry wall and landscaping in the southeast corner of the site. Staff met with both the 1 applicant and Mr. and F!rs. Hirsch on December 22, 1986 to discuss these requirements. Attached for your reference is such summary of discussions. 1 B. Posed Modifications to Conditions 13 6 14 of Parcel {{ map _5ru . upon furtherInspection' of e site along e sou Fi ana oast property boundaries to assess the needs for block wall and landscaping, staff recommends that the Planning Commission may eon.,ider the following modifications: 6 ITEM E . f - P A1t :BE RT / PARC81; MAP 57 :8}lt3Tl4$R$ January 2$. n Page L I. Existi1ho Condition; 13 reaft as, fol�tows: Prior to recur 9..a oat tsortK wati shall „ be reggiredt along ;the proparty! 1 irce. been Parcel " and property to the ssouth., The will shall b#? c6r,40,ble in. appearance- with the exiastfr, nf,ice iz[a,�"l�di' and resirdercces,., The � , iandscapirgf ors tl.j south, perimeter of Parcel shal'1 WF. at��e-Mid W provide a si,gni°ficartt increase acteptablie to ttie City 'Plannee'. Staff CQateant:. After carki;`O evaluiiion -of the site,along the � k south properly boundary,` staff believes that the mounding, the maturity of the trees and j shrubs Is,radequate In providing a buffer for the resddeaces.. 'There are, however, certain open gaps along the ,eritire length of the southI property 'landscape" plrpter area that need r additional pl•antfng�of! trees. and shrubs, Staff also believes goat installing a six-foot ,"sigh masonry wall on tap of,the existing retaining AOL wall: could create a visual impact detrimental to the southerly residences, although the wall may further, attenuate the Tow level noise of the office parle. Howevers the southeast portion of thA site, which abuts Mr. and Mrs,- _ Hirsch`s lo,4,; needs a six-foot high masonry a wain and arlditiona.I landscaping to discourage pedestrian• acc*ss through the project site and the Hirsch r*si Bence to the southerly si ngl e family homes Therefore, Condition 13 could be modified to read as folio : A sly T5) foot mason snail be required along the contiguous property line between Parcel 2 and 8796 Caluma Court Landscaping on the entire southerly perimeter of Parcel 2 shall be augmented to provide a significant increase and buffer acceptable to the City Planner. Cetalled plans of both the:: six (6) foot ,aasonry wall and the additional landscaping shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval and installed prior to recordation of the map, i . PLA4iNi+h s pnp.T ' PARCEL bt -Ti, ,s fs E.�B tQTHEaS January,..2Bt, IG9B7 ' Page z. 2. Existing,conditfon 14 reads as; follows-: Prior. to recordi*n k aR sia:: 664 foot fence shah be, provrP"f0oA, the southeast corner as Parca 2 to a, suf'Ittent dirstahce n6rth, to d4courage L � access, toA residential property ttt the souttih Staff Grimm As; stattdt 0 ,the appiitcant^and'other` resirdemts on Carle agar#,. KIEV school; students use, the south east>portion: of the project' , and° the. ". Hirsch property ut as, a. short c to, the schdoll and park'through holie?i�ii the exdcs�tiAg; chain. E 'Iink- fenm Based on,di�scussilons wi.-h the City's tbmwnitt,, serv,tdes Department", this f existt.�ngp chaitrt. l°ink fence, among, the, east slide of the pt*aect east, property 'boundary once ' 6e7giana ed ,to, the Countr Flton+f Control Afistrict. (,,fth the cansteuctiatr n-4 the' Rer ,l' I Park,, this chain l i;nk fences NNcd%ev the d property of the, &iety, The C turittyF Servrices, q 6epartlint has no pp�U s ins upgradibg, the existing chain link fence to, other 'erfr�T. + In order for the applicant to comply w,-th the Conditions of approval for jhf& Pare'')Map, as ' described above, a new six (6) foot feitoe,would have to be provided on the applicants side of the east:property boundary. f Further evaluatinrt of the site shows tbi3t there is a six to seven foot drop from the project J site parking lot to the existing chain link fVice, TIT reviewing the detailed landscaping E p1,+1-1 teen the Redhill Park, where is another sateen foot drop of slope area with slope planting as shown in Exhibit C. 7berefore, a total of twenty-one to twenty-fir feet, high inslope area from the top of the parking lot to the pedestrian pathway would exist with appropriate landscaping. This height of the, slope areaway detour the behavioral, pattern of some of the teenage school kids. lurtheroore, it is to the benefit of the applicant fit providing a more Permanent fencing or dense landscaping along this portion of the east property boundary to protect his property. Staff recommends that the Planning Comission consider One of the foll'owirg alternatives be completed prior to the recordation of the map: 'j y ;, PLAtiN COMMESST"OW STAFF REPORT ' PARCEl'�M9?eC 5786,4--gROWEL'L BROTHERS January rS, 1987 w P'age, 4 Ask Extonsive landscaping such as: Specimen size trees, Anereased number of trees and , thorny shrub; end vines such as Bouganvillea planted at fifve. feet on center along, the chain Iffik fence, should be provided to discourage pedestrian access rroar the project site to the school and, the, park, Deta Ted Tandscape and Irrigation plans' should be subaritted for City Pl-Anner revs-ear and.approval,, to be coordi'n&1;W,, with the mMa Conity+ Service Department, and shall be completed' prior to recordation of 'the map, ar b. A• new,fence of wrought iron, material and F property Sboundary d be ifromTttthh along {'of east the a easterly adjacent project, and south to the end of the project site east property boundary_. Detailed plans should be . submitted for City Planner review and approval and the fence installed: prior to recordation of the map. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Conmai'ssion conduct a - Tic hearing to consider the above requested modification to the Parcel Map 5786. If the Coaetission concurs with the staff findings and determinations then, conditions 134 14 should be ardified as stated in the attached ResoTution of Approval.. Re #anner date I Brad City BB:Nr:sgr Attachments: December 2Z, 1986 Sum�ary Discussions With Applicant and the Residents December 10, 1986 Planning Commission Staff Report and t4inutes, Reaolutiorr No. 84-50 Exhibit 'old" Parcel Map 5786 Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "C" -Detail l'andsrape plan of adjacent Redhill Park C'i7f k s.. 1 k h..i S.'.��.. A.• _� t-r—j�..J+-....�.w.' S:+.— S. , C w!.�...� t�."? I{1+,+�+��Z! It.4N�K UGA I-OM4 e�%$07.RWhO CamoMiT'U ale➢ �7 .(714)9t F, Deanis L sc«a -January 6, 1987 ' " David A. Gar,, D;4rector project Planning, CAV C/l, I00a$'pprated. i EAama wain 521 :Rorth Nountatm Aaquey, Suite A Upland, CaTffgrni'a'p1 8fi SUBJECT: PARCEL. MAP 5786 MODIFXATION Dear tit*. Cooper., 'shank you for taking time out toneA. 10th>be and Mr. and Mrs. Hirsch rtgarding.your project. The following is a sum ary of our discussiort on December 22, 198 6 meetings Li Yaw proposed to install .a chain, link fence and plan addtttonil trees along tree north property, line of Mr. and,t 's. Hirsch"s property, W. and @9 S-Hirsch 6.tated that' chail tin fencin§ fs net an acceptable material as teenage school kids could still climb over it. A block wall would be prefer-ed. Staff recomocnds a more permanent fenclog material he provided such as a block wall. 2. You proposed; to fix t;,,e torn„porti®n of the existing chain link fence along the east property line of your 1 project. Staff stated that the Planning Comission has j provided direction where a more, permanent looking ferw4rig be provided. The design shdjld be compatible to adjacent project that is under construction (California Retireient Community), which is.of'wrought iron material- and pilaster, 3. You proposed to plant additional landscaping where needed along the south property boundary and the east property boundary.. . Based on our discussion and after further OeViv, Staff has r nose the !: following deterainaVons and will be recomending 'to the Planning Cosmaission on January 28, 1987 regular meeting: 1. A six-foot masonry wall should be provided along the property line of W. and Mrs. Hirsch's property consistent with thV condition of approver. This wall shall be completed pfior to recordation of the map, Parcel3 Januar�t`?, 19t3Y' Page 2, )i 2. Based�la the discussion with the CiWs Community Service Department,, the existing" chain MA fence aftng . the east side" of your eae c, property t�fu�a,,y, once belongi 0 tha COUnty Firood l6ntroi Di.str-VW'., liith�the constnuci^ion: of the Red W-11 Park,.this cha<in', 1 ink, fence hecomn the. property, of the city.- In, order tot comply wig the cond;t-iov of approval, for your Parcel Map, a new, siuc foot fenceF shaul& he provi-dd& on.your s.tdi, of the east prgpertiy Uundary. As you are-aware; there is an establrished: behavioral p. rn tte " from teenage, .school kids to use" the sa4theast portion. of your site, as a ; shortcut to;'the school' and tt,, park. It: is to, your benefit in pirov$ding a' more Permanent fewtog along the east property hnLndary, tq.protect your,pi,*perty. Staff r%omwnda tl-at one of the T f owing a�Fternatives be ty colleted pri`dr_io fine: recordation of t-s reap: a. Ektensive landscaping suctu as specimen- size trees: increased number, of 'trcas, and vines such as. Bougainvillea planted at five feet an center along Usi chain 1 ink fe,.r -be provi.ded to discourage pe&ztriarf,,�acciss from your property to the school I:nd park. b. Tns-tall a new"fence of wre-:ght iron wacerial and pilaster cc ►atOW--4 to the adjacent project,, that is unaer construction. Should you have any spdestions re-4arding the abbe,,su mry ofdiscussion of the December 22.. 1986 meeting "Id"Staff determinations, please do not hesitate to contact m` at any time: Sincerely, CONWN1 DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PU9NN DIYI N cy F Assosia Plan er NF:te cc. and Mrs.: Hirsch tifad Sullen Dan Coleman fir-- t 5 WT 0Nfotidn: Moved,by T,'olstoy, seconded ay;McNiel �o,Iissue a Negative Declaration a adopt tits 1'e p7fut on approving Envir;:nmental Assessment, and Variance 86- °'` 1. 06. tion carri,td'uy the following Vote:.= AYES: COMISSIONERS' TOLSTOY, MCNIEL, BARKER, CHITIEA ?TOES: C. CIONERS, NONE ABSENT: COMMISSION v NONE -carried— Motion: Moved by McOel second. ,by[thitioa, to issue &Negative Declaration aria adapt the Resolution apltsaw.t1� vironmentt1' Assessmefit and Conditional Use Permit 84-24,, :with th&•del'etifon o ngine,Qrimg Condition 3 c.'requiring the undergroundiny of utzl•tties pn thc, 'd side of the A.T. & S.F. Railroad right Q - . Motion carried,pi the,4. lowing votes AYES: CoRil3al,6 E MCNI'EC., CHITiEA., B R> TD4STQY HOES: IS=NERS: NONE ABSENT: CCMISSIONER5: NONE carried K. PARCEL. MAP 5786 MODIFICATTON. CROWELL BROTHERS The request to �• `i ' eliminate a condition of approve aequTrin. a ans,a lation of a six fJt. foot high masonry mall and-aa, '*onal landscaping along tia south boundary { line for an approved office par subdivisir,`a:, located at the,. southeast corner of Base Lire Road and Cariie+ian Street - APN 207-01-28.`4Nancy Fung, Associate Inner, presented the staff report. ',airman Barker opened tm: public near•`-,c + %;rowell, applicant, gave :an overview of the request. Linda Hirsch, 8792 Caluma Court, uancha Cucamonga, stated that since the pradect has gone In she has had problems with people crossing her property. She fel-t the wall houid be constructed as originally conditioned to +haifitain their safety and privacy. • I Mitcnell Hirsch„ 8792 Caluma Court, Rancho Cucamonga, stated that it is an unsafo `situation at his home. He stated that the property is not maintained by the developer and he has 'beew maintaining at. HP. agreed,,tha tnr 'hall should be required as previously conditioned. He further `ted that the landscaping which has died or trees which have blown over iK wtr story nave. never beer. replaced. Thera .rre no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. 9 Planning Commission Minutes -5- December 10, 1986 t r Gafmissianer gal toy stated that he hid-calked tine site from the street`to fle wEs er lipundarx of the site and.agreed tnat Mr. Hirsch's lot is';an excepti°n t,F In that the,'rest of the lots are,fairly wcl I buffered'. He noted` that i appeared tome of-the Shrubbery has 'either disappeared or was never plantea and }; felt there are daces t.at could: Stand .one more planting along the eatirk' si te, He f�l t tK-„' sosuei hi ng shou3 d be done to help the Hirsch`s i n thei r del ima. _ Commissioner McNei to that there is a problem with the Hirsch's lot; 4` however, was also concerned with,,the chainlink fencing;,along the .eastern 4 boundary -of the site. Commissioner Chitiea stated th;at,tfti� .Projc�!t has been conditioned in the past to address this protllert Fur r:.?t' t!tat this has been�a continuing proi)lam and r a nuisance factor and �houcht that the requirements should be tit. 'Sne did not fz`el it unreasonable, to ask the developer to compi,y'with toe, original conditions of approval.' ; Commissioner 8ar;er questioned if the walt }is to, continue along this piece of property, where Mould it be logical to.atop? Coo issiordr Tolstoy suggested that staff• make an assessom6i; df the-Site and make that determination on the wall. •�He further sugge.StQ that staff should K make an inspection of the landscaping to sea if it needs replacement. Co issioner McKie] Liggested that staff clso asses- the chainlink fen., along < the eastern boundary to see if it should be walled o f tag well. E Ms. Fong a =SeL that tine adjacent Senior housing project is going to h�.Ye wrought it n, fencing to the south end of their property, Ralph Hanson. Deputy City Attorney,, advised that the t0missi:on h}id pot been provided a Resolution for thlsu item; therefore, recommended that the public k' hearing be reopened for continuance -purposes to allow staff to bring. back recommendations on the wall and proeide a Resolution for cosideration. Chairman Barker reopened the public hearing, Mr. Crown consented to a continuance to January 2%, i9fi7. Motion: Moved by McKie], seconded ny Chitiea, unanimously carried, to 1 continue the public hearing for Modiftcation to Parcel Map 57$6 to they January 28, 1987 Planning Cos mission meeting: motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COWISSI0NERS MCNIEL, CHIT?EA, BARKED, TOLSTGY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried i I Planning Commission Minutes -6- December 10, 198ti { I t r w. �— CIT,Y OF RANCHO.MC:AXONGA M OR DATE: December 1%, 1986 U ' , a 1977, TO: Chatrnnan and Members(of the Planniing Comission FROM: Brad Duitle�,._G.ity Planner BY: Haney-Fong,, Associate Planner UBJECT: ADQENDLg4 TO"F llFSEK6. 109[ 086: Pifi.3Aililb'a Go 9IS-mNSTAFF On-,December--, 1956, staff, stet in the fi,ehd with the appvicant to Inspect , condition. of the existiing Yandscaping`and tne, requfrement - for wall. The block wall was to prai ldi i,W#rer from.sound and: 1'i ;c for i he southerly residents.. Based! on them. iz�specti�on staff J) Y ,�,Aeves that the.mounding• andi mati(rify of the trees aesd.the shrubs;, and the density of them is adequaie1. in prori�d ing a puffer for the res i dences. .However, at the.southr easterkl y porti:oh of theP site, where ' it abuts the Tast tot on, the north,,slide of N11 vuma>Coourt there fs a need for a new wal i, clean up Of the area, add;itii 6ii'al trees.,and shrub! and trinWng of the existinita trees. The jnstalelitionf of`a 6`foot black wall on top of,the existing retaining w611 allaong the entire. south property line, may further attenuate the Tow, level noise of the office project but may also he a visual impact detrimental to the residents. Alt�,ough public hear`jg notices,were mailed,cut, staff has only received comests from one res�ent,. 'Mi.. :}i rsch, Dur.fng tfie i nspecti oq staff ' met with Mr. Hirsch, who�4tated that the Condition of Approval L.?.qui.r•ing installat zsn of block wail and landscaping should y, adhered to The developer has agreed to word with staff, and Mr: HiAch in resolving the issue of providing fencI'ng, cleaning up the area a6d adding landscaping tc this portion of the site. RECOMENDATIOW Staff recoetnends that the Planning Commission conduct a r pubil.1c nearing to consider the above requested modifications to the Parcel, Slap 5706. If the Commission concurs with staff findings and determinations, the,., conditi:ohz; f13, and 14 should be ravind to only apply to the last lot on the north side of Caluma Court. Attachment RF:sgr *�'� r tau � 'J •` � � � C1,WY OF RAIMHO CUGAtV ONGA,� _ ax' DATE: ®&Wie'ar 10, 2906 TO o4i`man andi M.`eaitierst of the Planning Com s�kbli 1, , FROM., ara sulller, CiEtr Planner By: hapq*,Fort,, Asspoate,P}hapner :r � �. SUBJECT., �Pi? GEi.�<1fiA ,` i fi NiDD�_FECAM10 ..CRDi ELL_ BitOTdE�S?-- TFse regups��ai e ��na,e��-:on ,�_,ions o •w,gprova�s reauaa^�flng«the:: ins' ,.IIVat fo a Ox and. ad i i�qr l" Band capiin�.a�itong ''< he sauth� boundacyr It tee or,, an approYe affi#ce ,uric i 5libdi vi�&fon lYocatecf' , ;t he sogthRaSt° cornea a Base i:3°ne'Road' acid;Earn ;z n Street - APN; ZOT=Q31 28 ` 1. ABSTRACT Thee applicant its requesting, for the el-imi°natebn of the con n lan- 5 destri;bed above:. II. AmysIs. 01, A. General. On June 13.. 1984, the Pi•anOng Commi€ssion, ho'd a #,.. PUD13c earing to consider Parcel Map 51,86 and! con4ittona3ly approved. it. ThIs Parcel, Map-was, granted a one year extens{on to June 13, 1987.. jn, response to, residents concerns a Cc ditit�ir of ',:Approval w ooded to roquire imstallati-on of a ix foob h�t_�,mzsonryYwall and additional landscaping,along the south prope, boundary prior to recordation Qf-the Map. The f` purpose of this condition is to provide a buffer for the adjoining properties to the south from sound and light. A cop, of the June' 13, 1984 PI(2nning Commission Minutes has been attached for your, review. 1 A site inspection along the southern property boundary indicated that the shrubs such as, oleanders are overgrown and- the trees are in a mature state, howaver, there are gaps where additional landscaping could be planted. A height differential exists.'between the 'residences, and the project-site,-where, a 3 foot to four foot high retaining..:,block 'wal; runs 31otlg the residences side of the property boundary. To date, the applicant ha's not submitted plans showing the design awd height of block wall and land;r ping for staff to reviei-,CC E -%(,�, / LJ LIS CORRSid DICE#T, Tis iat has ee►v aterti is,ed kin.the i3a71yA..rt . nes�spapehtf Hrafp ,pot,�ccg wepeh$sent :o prop , yes : , n DO� e a� p,aec site and' thrap�er�ty posted r staffx as p 'reeVecadreamts fro�a i hey sirrauning res den REC4� N Ttm s that ,they'^g�i"aAni�n� Coraon�Jsstop` ,. up a: �"5o�ii�o of"11p�saa;: Resp 8�a u1�1` ric C'i`Ly,PT7anner Attachments; ApplIcant"sIetter Reiguesting fiar Eliainatiuon of the. Ca�dl� on cfz Approdal k �]uner r398� ?tanng Cs4;anF'Mi!nuj ttesokuiio 84=09 for per el 4apt5;Wand the Conditions o klRpoi!-Oy ' a Cxhl$ i °A"- - ParselL Map 57r86 exh6tt."8` '= i5ite�Ut3'izati�ott'Map� ip r i; 'i a A _ ii i — �j i. �' RESOLUTION NO. 84-50 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC41ONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 5786 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 5786) LOCATED AT.; THE SOUTHEAST CORNER. OF BASE LINE AND CARNELIAN STREET WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 5786, submitted by Crowell Brothers and consisting of 2 parcels, located at the-southe st`eOrner of Base Line and Carnelian Street being a division of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 4869, as u recorded in Parcel Map Book 49 Pages 46 and 47, records of San Bernardino _ County, State of California; and WHEREAS, 'on May 4, 1984, a ,formal application was submitted requestinn review of the above-described ;`entative Map; and WHEREAS, on June 13, 1684, the!;;Planning Con-mission field a duly advertised public hearing for the above-d*'110bed maps NOW.,. THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA'PLANNING COMMrSSION. RESOLVED AS, pa FOLLOWS.: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: r' 1. That the map is consistent:with tj+%general Plan" 2. That the improvement of the proposed suhdivizkon is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects an abutting. property. SECTION 2:: That this project will not create significant adverse erviranmenta impacts and a Negative Declaration is issued on June 13, 1984. SECTION That Tentative Parcel Map No. 5786 is approved subject to the r c---mend 'Eonditions of approval pertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JUNE, 1984. PLAN C` OMMISSiON OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY; Dennis L, tou,: airman ATTEST• r�-- T mez, eputy ecretary 9 s � S'ecpet}ary of the Planning Cbmnisston of .the City, of _ Rune. ama ,a �day ei6y";ce3atfy the i'tia foragaing; Resaitk4�an,way-,,dtsl ;aid regula yf vn�rodueed asses a�idd adaPte�� $y,.the P°limn i'ng;Com lfi§- C.9ty of Rancho C baman �(„atS 14 reg�Jlar meetsng; af' t nns'rsg,.C�amii szan tiietd on the' Lath 'day:of ine Y,48q;, by the fdTlow_ ig AYES: CO i!1iiS IONERSo.` `REMPEL.,-McNIEL„ BA'RKEiI, STOUT NOES;; CO M18it NOS•. NONE t ASSENT-. CC1FtE I,SS#ONERS::, NONE i I� _ " u CtIT� of RANCHO CUCAkMt1M R%"Ei DED-CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL .. LOCATION: Soot. last- L- mer of'Base Line TENTATLY]5"TARCEL MAP In. 5ifi6 3 and Carnelian Street DATE FILEDyay- 1984 n— LEOAz DESCRIPTION. ,Earcel .2 tkparael mat), tif1Al�ER tfF':L"t}TS? 2 _.. , 4869, as recorded'irr-RArcel Mays Li9 "Pages, GROSS AP.REA6e.- 46'& 47 tlecorda of Sao:Rernardi.nof-County ASSES$DR�p*CEL N4: 207433-28 ate;p >"t "'3l"i4k�t7h'kk^A'ir#�sk4&*dFt4'k3F�Ptt�1' �L'�^trfi`lFfktirftrk7iR�'k'4'k7ltrcldi^ki�tt�try�*.intit*kAy7p#7klkkaFk4**irr#k DEYE4 P t O;3 ER FMlN€ER,/SURV,%F Crt:weilYorothers , same aS _Associated En preers 521 N. Mountain Avp,; 316 East HE" Street SUM. U land, 9 CA 1786 ii �.�,. ....� — � Ontario, Ica slas4 ` 1 Iwenvaxent and dedication requ,irewents in accord with Title '16 of the _ Municipal Code of the City of Raneha cuoannga Include, but my not be Yi�aite� -1 to, the following; J Dedications and Vehicular Access 1, Dedications shall be made of all interior street rights-of-way and all necessary easements as,shown on the tentative map. 2. Dedication, shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the following "streets: additional feet on additional feet on additional feet on _ 3. Corner property line radius will be required per City Standards. 4. All rights of vehicular ingress and egress shall be dedicated as follows: X 5. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements curing access to all parcels and Joint maintenance of all common roads, drives or parking areas shall he provided by C .&R.s and shall be recorded concurrent with the map. [ Cc, ! 1 X 6. All' oxiWarngi easemeniws lying within future right-of-way are to. be .,gQhtW11Aed or delineated otr the map per City. Engineer's reouiremeniis, 7, Easements.for sioewa4k for public use shaij,1 be dedicated, to the ,. City wherer &dewa4ks- meander-through private pro perty�.� Suretir 1.. Surety shalll` W posted and an agreement executi:o: to. the satisfa6lb3;ona of 'thee C`i'ty: Engjimer and. Cityp Abtorney, guar<anirg° completion; of thee puhli:e, iinproveraents� 'pr.�Vr to recordii4.5z,. and%or prior l to buisidi?�gP erm t ssuance or' i X Z. A Lien agr •eesn� t must be executed.prior,to., recording of the map for Basee tihe Ak d; Sets d' 1 Se ,inR #11. on Pages 5. +� 3. Surety sha]`t(Fposted and ar, agreement: executed„g;.arantee-ing complitian off, kU art-ssi e. A i!nage factlites necesary for desatersng}� o the- silsac�,ono thBulld�in andg Safety, rwldr td^recording for and/or prior issuance,of building permit ,bra Street In venenft Pursuant fo t e City of Ranch Cucamonga Municipal Code, Tittle 16 Section 1 16.36.120, the subdiWder may enter into; 'an agreement and. post security with > ` the City guaranteeing the regtWeed construction prior to recordation of th"ap and/or building permit issuance. 1. Construct full ,street improvements including, 'but not limited to, curb(*iU, tter, AX. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trews and street lights_,on all interior streets. 2. A minimum of 26 foot wide pavement within a 40-foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be. constructed for, all half- section-streets. B. Construct the following missing imnrovemehtsa ` Prior to recordation for Prior to building permit issuance for Curb r e- Drive Street Street C. Med f an. Street Hama Gutter Pvmt, vJblkMpr. Trees Li hts Overlay island* ©the *Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter -2- _v 4. rrlid�r t any,wworC being performed' in th.� pubic rghst-of�-. ay . fie be paid and,an enoro4dhment per,att s�hanA,-ezC�y�ty Ergineer'S Offs"ce, in" addition to anotge Per egbfred. 5 Stree� i r"ovemeg ,. Mans slratil be . ared 6r �: a 'Prep Y Regi ;ered Ci—I", En9fnee and,� approved , y mthe' Cify EngiPn issuance Hof an encroachnsent permit. M E. Qeyeloper slia'li. coo0dfnate;. an where nece sar P J's ,RaY ior the ` re}l'ocation pf any rower .pokes or, other excel irg ubt5c f u"t"igities:a jnecessarr ,;. 7 Exist nq Imes of 10C J�or less fronting the oper y .hai-l' be underau��ed. � pr� } ropfi,a 'it, strr���eet name signs,, ,traffic e i�i�1,� signs, i striping a mankings„w:irtli locations ani# types ap✓r oue'°d bY.the City rEP9i, e�r; g Street,:, 1oc"ion4,, as,required, aye to be app"coxed.by the -- Soz kern 'alif,&A a Faison Company 'hand '06 City of Rancho; Cucamonga. Lights `shall, .be on, decorative `poles" with underground se e. 10. Landscape and irrigation Plans shall" be -;submitted to and agpCoved by, the 1ann."I Division prier . the As suanae of building permit. !P 11. Concentrated rt e z d drainage flows � II g f s shall not cross. Sidewalks. Undersidewalk drains shall be fnstaited to City Standards. P, Drainage and Flood Control 1. Private drainage easements ,for cross-lot drainage shall be rauired and shall be delineated or noticed on the final map. C. 2. ;'Aid@auate.provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surfate drainage entekng the property from adjacent arei.;. 3. The following storm drain shall be instalied,�,,to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 4, Prior to recordation of the reap, a hydrologiit? and drainage study for the project shall be submitted to the:City Engineer for review. 5. A drainage detention basin per City Standards shall be constructed to detain increased runoff 1� m. ' h a IS Graslin << X 1. Cradtng. of the subject property shall Pie in accordance with the < llnfform;'Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted E' grading practices. The final 4rad.,4pq plan shall be 'ire substantiAl conformance with the,'approved conceptual grading plan. X 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engfneer licensed by the State of California to perform such work prior to issuance of building permit. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a quaff iffed engineer or geolog$st and submitted at the time .of application or grading p1m check, 4. The final-ograding-plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Grading Committee and shall be completed prior to recordat-ion 0 the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit whichever cages first. X S. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be, submitted to the ' Building and S,I?ety Division for approval prio)l_to issuance of t building permit. General Requirements and Ikpprovals X a. i'ermits from other agencies will be required as follows: CalTrans for San Bernardino County Flood Controlstr c Cucamonga County Hater District for sewer and water J San Bernardino County Dust Abatement (required prior to issuance of a grading permit) ether " 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions C.&R.s and Restrictions (C. ) a approved by the City Attorney is. required prior to recordation of the map. ;i X 3. Provide all'utility services to each lot including sewerage, I water, electric power, gas and telephone. j X 4. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District�,]�tandards. A letter of acceptance is required. Easements to C.C.W,D. are required for sewer and water. 5. This subdivision shall be subject to condit;^ns of approval ? from CalTrans/San. Bernardino County Flood Cora District. X 5. Approvals have not been secured from all utiiilies and oti�4r interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. -4- �C 7. ' rf 4[ng of the tentative map or approval of she doe n i guars i tirat�wer treatment �xpaeity w-ill be av ilabl'ep t the dime,bukdi�n,g permits ara requested, When builda`:ng permt"tIt acre requesi�e"d, Cher Cucamonga County 4taterr Ofistxfct wi11 asked' to`°cert�ifiy the arai.labill�i�ty of capac"ty lxernmri��-s�; , nat be�`.ued un�t:es+� said certfficatfa� is racei�ed"in wr �i' � �, and_�este!r Plltnned Yrails shah'�� be proui�;� �,�r a�corc�anoe g witha the Tray Plan(, A.detaijed trap}, plan adfesi ing'►rijdihs,. maximu ,s3apes,, phY;lixal candi tionS. f,16C4trJ and,weld in. aeco ancr with 1�i trail �stAndap'ds, s`h ll be is[� t>ed�ta, and appruv, b the: tfty, Plagne"r prtor id. ecoP aiIon far and�or prior to byf3dig permit issuance :or 9. Prior to rttor'ding, ,a dhposft shall be posted with the C9ty eaverifng. th* estimaltied` cost of appnrtfibnfn:g. the assessments unddrS Assessmedt:DiS*,67dt 8o-I,among the newt created' Q,arcels. X 14. fit the),time, of fifn4pi map- submiftCal, the fol��ow,ifng shaali be subm9ttedx Tft1e,,Report, traiviese calcuUtians: (sheets), coyfes ,of reeorded Im&ps and deeds used as reference, and/or showing prig fnal lard _division, tie notes and bench: marks referenced. X IL The condition requ.t,Ing a lien agreement for future construction of a median island )n Bas,P may be waived € - petldng rpsolutian by the fifty Council of z'Me median ista14 y AVIL X 12. Access e�aements through. the dry „parking areas 4esignatedip by- "Not A Party on the map z 'rft be ovided by the C.C.bR . X 13 Prior to recording, a six fO*t masonry wall shall be required' 7 along the property line between t ,rce1 2 and property to the south. iise wall sh :1 be corapawa6lp in appearance with the existing office building and residences. The landscaping on . the south. perimeter of Parcel 2 shall be augmented to provide a significant increase acceptable to the City Planner. k_ ' 14. prior to recording, a six ftot fence shall be provided fr n the southegst coveter of Parcel 2 a sufficient distance to the=�rarth to discourage access to residential property to the south. CITY, 4F RAHM CUC LLOYD S. GI, ENGINEER ty 464 Mom.0 ��p.�+ .off, T t a Apr rA , ! t' ` • ASSOCIAll Rrc CMOF AAN$e RGMO" IV Y OKdAtlEIOp ft 47MA GEDC f=I&tK MM:Z C F P'+�E 11�*W 40%. A GFCX%t m IN FLm x OKtAAAt£5 t Ci+i1.flE QFiHe CoAn CF UN ic"W:fiD' W.Stf1E rfeP '�Vo' OF If.GfE.E6►CEr -, �k' 1r4�,iKQ'Pl7tS.0 gGYgD!'T+r1911$f+#/f�x 4+yYF-f# • + +.LLL1}hLQ_ J� h4 tiLi.»F7N'v7cI.'�7F" «�tr.�:.WIYft.°,!'.. P : ' �21'fYCAR9IW'V,—NINA!+kk.7�fdPf.O � �Alyf. ,:: �' i �h'R C.vl� 9/7aefe \ 9Ai9!' a7M�G4 v+vxie-tyeu ! ✓' �02f h, a $ *A ZLINE �_�srXraT a+taec _ P. sxa• ,rrrr' ror• . 44 air �uvb Aor lx!'�'oam0 . ".1 - Nor APARr X Q. sal `' tug+�rs.am ;� t straw,.v ��� ,\ • ,i* I' �V:.. Q Fsrar L� pfk5 ab� rt J r RE j a ep i t Gi�st�PDAAtireS' f ! r#3.YRB V. .. N: t `v ,. r :� t :� s ! �'�h.Gif/f a•+alat;',.fir qe. it Tnu_ MANNM pt c. C !:( r a. �a t 3 4 I' s y 'f— 's Lj �l 1 C Y r c� �kl7� 3 F7s. gvgrr�� I vA1`� � TO '+' Tgoownld) Y _ Llfr -u��rc f 416' 60 fop or saf = OFf r PLANNM DIVMN SCCALF.= + Y i ! i.: I'd - • x t: I,v W r qi ♦tl T ussun® r lluurMulrl t1 llrlllutil\u\till tour r o n/els as - t-= RESOLUTION NO, A RESOLLMON OP,THE PLANNIM COMISSIOW OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC'AMOtt"aA, CRLIFORNYA, "tIOD%FYit ,. THE CONDITIONS, APPROVING TUTATEVE PARCEL: t«ka_NO. 57,86i LOCATED AT,THE, ;Y SOUTHEAST COkNER.OF BASE LINE AND CARNELIAN STREET WHEREAS, Tentative. Parcel VAp No. 5786 submitted by Crowell Brothers and conMstirg. of 2; parcels,, located at the southeast,corner o¢',Base: Line and Carnel i tem-Street; be,vq_a di�is1-on of Parcel 2 of Parcel trap 4853, ,as recorded in Parcel Mp— Book 46" Pages 46 and 47, rj rds of San Bernardino- County, State of Cal'tforni,a and WHEREAS, on: May 4, 1984„ a formal application was submitted` rdkWesting'review of the, above.4escribed Tentative Sap; WHEREAS, on,,Jane 1$., 1984, the- P ;ng Commi ssi on held a duly advertised public hearing, for the above: ,F4ibed- maj) and conditionally approved the tentative map -i WHEREAS, on October 21, 1986' the applicant requested for Planning t.. Comeission review on the;propasaT,=;* eliminate two conditions of approval for, this tentative map;- f WHEREAS, on ;December 10 , 2986, the Planning. Commi=>. on held a duly advertised public hearing for the above requast and continued it to January 28, 1987 regular meeting; ant'. I WHEREAS, on January 28, 1987 the Planning Cm;fssion held a public hearing to'consider the modification to the above described map; .o NOW, THEREFORE, The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission Resolved as llows: SECTION 1: That-..he following findings have Wen made: 1. That the map is consistent a th the General Plan, 2. That the improvecent of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General P1dn: 3.. That the site is phys.catly suitable for the proposed development. ' 4. That 'the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environtaental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That th,.-,N_,tJect will not create significant adverse enviranmen�aT impacts and a Negative Deelaratfoi, has been issued on June 13, AM 1984. �j i3 a J PLANNING NO. PM 5786 - MODIFICATION!-Y dRONELL BROTHERS January EB, 1987 Page SECTION 3: That the Modification to Tentative Parcel Map No. 57B6 is approved su ec the fallowing conditions. and the Conditions of Approval r` contained in the attached Resolution 84-50 with the standard conditions: w 1. All conditions of approval' contained in Resolution. No. 84-5O shall apply. except for conditions 13 & 14 of "general rdqul-, nt--and approval" section of the Resolution which are repealed. 2. A six ,(61, foot masonry,Oall shall be required along the property line between Parcel 2 and $792 Caluma Ct. Landscaping on the south perimeter of Parcel 2 shall be augmented to prDvide a significant increase c acceptable to the City Planner. DetaiTed plans of the masonry gall and landscaping shall be ,submitted for City Planner review and approval and the landscaping and wall installed prior to recordation € of the map. p f 3. ;One of the following alternatives shall be completed prior to recordation of the map: a. Extensive landscaping such as species size trees, !' increased number of tirees, 'and'shru s, and vines such as Bougainvillea, planted; at five fee* on center along the chain link fence shall be provided to discourage pedestrian access from Ae project site to the school and the park. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shalt be submitted for City Planner review and approval, to be coordinated with City's Community Service Department, and shalt be completed prior to recordation of Map._ b rill and pilaster . . Anew fence of wrought iron mate fl shall be installed along east ,property boundary from the end of the easterly adjacent project south to the end of the project site. Detailed plans shall be submitted for City Planner's review: and approval and to be'completed prior to recordation of the map. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH, DAY OF JAHUARY, 1987. PLANNING COMISKON OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: av ar,.er, Chal rman ATTEST: Braa Sul , -2 S F'as��t mrad6 �f�r. tip �SetM ar�Y.� ®f tliek Ptka nn .C'cisiOn; oittyµ�i� R4ncN Csscadgn ark►,hem �Fr thheRe �iae� odacd �wR �3d ��Opd t2 1t a f�antr,�s C side City ai;iTanct ';� are ar n ?moo ,f Pl ax�li�ng Cr ss `o v tier :Y. OSi, iL 28tE1 , daY Of°V Ur {i th ► 'OI) Yrf$@Oµ�irls s LLt, ct !I-P ony—ormA'fil1�:t� :C J'CA, OVGA � CAI �4 aslX r T a � A c iC 19,m°. DATE- ' Janu60,Y(,`28;, 1987 TO; chai hai and embers, Gomi'ss4iixl' FROM: Barrye i{ K'HanFsor�*,x�Senh'or�,Ciwil En i;necr SUBkECT: ENViIRChlQtEH►T4L i SSESSMEN�T'.ts2iD TJotlifW?alt a< RF:R.G. 1. siAFvr _%,,xu ma, i oun " aters;lisstt�:et sUn o off, fa �a�to~ parcel,s �,n tt"e� ti oo� :Cp�fitol` desi� ore`dT,00ast�ed :on>`t rorilrrest carp fin%of Foottilai BouleXard}and Sap*,Dnegq:Avenge APtd 2a :,�43' :. Attached is a. Tester from:the GUcamongrx.Cb►1ntgy Water Di(sti*lct requesting that the Parcel Map application be,-a�ithdA'A at thri`i dine.; Respectfully submitted, Barrye R. Hanson-.- Senior Civil Engineer ! BRHsjh. Attachments: Letter from the Applicant 3 STEM F, tu ' via-„,P.r✓awN- `,. �`y n � ® �, '� �� 4 SaretarxraGswmikdfswi� W'' R D.l-S' '1F 1�,�'t 8641,SAM,MUNAR01NCOT Ct1GSM0lfGA.CALIF;$A030 M YIN 636 ii7�26i! mR� VICTOR A,cHZRaAK.JR..,P,mv*vE' January 19, 1 9 7 `; City of Rancho) Cucamonga En4ineering Detrartmenfi ` P. O. Fox 807 Rancho.\Cucamonga,, Califijrn a 91730 Atten----%*n: Barrye Hansen Re Tentative Parcel 'Map 10229, Gentlemen: �J The Pistrict hereby requeats)th'ait you withdraw, our tentative parcel map application. from.the Jdnuaxy-2:8, l"9S7, Planning Commission McLiting•, and: that the application be held in abeyance until Further notice. The D-..cstr3ct does not wish to proceed ,ll with the submittal at this time. If you have: any questions concerning this matter, please cont.ct the undersigned., YOUX0 truly, _ CUCAMONGF COUNTY WATER DISTRIC'S 6 eering Department Fupervisor R JHC•bf t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 28, 1987 1977 & r0: Chairman.and Members of the Planning Commission ' i�'tllb � FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner P e Greg Gage, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR, CONDITIONIAL USE PERMIT 84-21 - ALTA CRUEN- A conversion of 1:,858 square foot ss Tnarnnce to an office for the Alta Loma Chri'sti'an. Church on a 25, acre parc^l, of ]+and in the Very Low District (0-2 duelling units/acre), locaed on than west side of Sapphire, across from Orange APN: ' 1062- - 332-23. I. BACKGROUND: At its meeting on January 14, 1987 the Planning omm�on continued the above referenced Time Eytensioit Request to tonight's meeting. Staff requeste� a continuance to allow the [ church ample time to clean; up and reseed its vacant property to the ' north of the office and preschool facilities: On January 18, 1987,1 tW Planning Division received a letter from the resident at 6375 Sapphire, which reiterated previous concerns about the vacant area and its affect on surrounding properties, A: clean up and reseeding of the property . has not yet been completed. Accordingly, the requested time extension should not be approved until such time that all work` is complete on the vacant parcels II. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission- con nue this tem for 30 days, and direct. the church to complete the clean up and reseeding of vacant church property north of the existing facilities. Res fully s tt ra 11 r City Pla ner BB:GG:vc Attachments: Letter from Resident at 6375 Sapphire Planning Corcsaission Staff Report, January 14, 1987 ITEM G I 7 Pr � 1 W.H. Uagles, 6315,Sapph iv Alta Lama '10 Jan 87 1 Planning;Division, r Rancho Cucamonga . .fi a, Foe: Timm']A tensim.:fdr Ca?,dit'.;.osal Uwe Leann 84-21 r I boos no objecfi,�+�f try"the croht3 sane of CM84.-21 om tte,Sam � g +mds;>set fartl}znsreso5ion 84t� '6 datr Qtav^84». The ctension shoved Yee fc ono n 2, �„ B t CrAf the �� g both=srs hour cam the citr Gmsi r.an l9citE!i1sib Cf CUF rain the.f3n-st. r. CUP 83-04 haw-'n�ewea~-7b®eis,full illea. 10 A staff repwt dateat 9''Jan 85, A CrcRnndchver for exposed graded areas RRne lidscaper plate,.• t' .£0 ° _.-,,..1"nstaLl am 4 system a groun3cove do all cured aLjea3. iaz�gatS<x2: r This bar.,never beet,,:done. (.:++ amain gkzti an:eyes-sue, a f r&bazdrd acid,just a general nuisance., E= the last,=up'l,e year&during the dry sewm the Lesid9encl on tb&,a SSdCC off'SePPhix bevve;been subject to an M . dttaCt of tumble.weeds=Eram the,C1]urt h property-,. The Alta Lana,Christian Ct tnr.:h has made vez little effort to control the matter. in fact, is Nco 86,, they cut, sate of tbe. weeds,-piled t..tmn'up a mg Sq*bix a oct thue property air]Waited until the winds came to blad,the twb];e.weeds onto."Hkaphim and the property on tba east :side of SaVph re.(thti tumble w_ b,, been Piled up for over twO weekg) The tumble weeds csxnsed traffic Problaw and residence problems. I had to call Code Eafoz'cw=t to resolve the matter,. But, ab -utter still remains. would Ulm this hatter salved before we coo on. W.H. Ungles k F r _1 CPT'OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA _ucn yo STAFF REPORT jp >> DATE.: January 14, 1987 1977 TO, Chairman an,"tmbers of the Planning Commission wr° FROM: Brad Buller, City:Planner w BY: Greg Gage, Assistant Plainner ' SUBJECT: TIME ,EXTENSION, FOR CONDITION€L US'E PtXXIT 84-2T C`_ ALTA u - 1v convef5TQn of d 1.131511 square oo s1n:g a am, y residence to an office for the Aita Loma Christiao Church on' a .Z5 acre parcel'ot land, in the ' Very. Lott P,eside'ntiai DistrictiO-2" dwelling units per acre, located on the:west side of Sapphire, across froth Orange. APN: 10662 332 - 23. I. ABSTRACT: The Arta Loma Christian Church is requesting a two-year exex ern an of timi: for Conditional Use Permit No. 84-21, due to a period of slow growth.. The approved Conditional Use Permit allowing the temporary conversion of the single family residence to an office for the church. was due to expire on November 28, 1986. p Although time extensions are normally approved as consent calendar items, this request was advertised as a public hearing due to a nearly added condition for utility undergrounding. The Engineering Division subsequently determined that it would be.inappropriate to attach a utility undergrounding eonaition to this request. The public hearing must be conducted as advertised. II. BACKGROUND: The Commission approved the Conditional;;Use Penn?it on ovember 28, 1984 and directed staff to review an ext :ling. Conditional Use Permit for the adjacent church pre-school (CUP V, 04) for compliance with the Conditions of Approval.. St. _,f identified several issues regardin6 landscaping, lighting, wall treatments. and hours ^f operation., p¢r review Dy the Planning Commission on January, v 1985. Ati he applicant's request, the items were continued to the Planning Ccstattission meeting of January 23rd. At the January 23rd meeting, the Commission reviewed the outstanding issues and determined that the project was substantially in compliance with the Conditions of Approval for Conditional Use Permit 83-04 with the exception of groundcover . installation for erosion control on church property north of the existing facilities. During:. the hearing, a church representative indicated that the 3.4 acre area was initially seeded with groundcover; however, the, seed. had failed since no irrigation system was installed. The Commission reached the consensus that. the church should re-seed graded areas with a drought resistant wildfiower, without irrigation. L, NG1SIn HIREP . 8�1-2�t L?1 (`{ CUP . s �ALSiIAN CHURCH Page.2 III. ANALYSIS: Review" of ,the site has `shown that the church has su s an ally corapl3,ed with all Conditions of 'Approval for ,° Conditiona? Usex'Permi°t Na: 84-21. Ttie Conditions of Approval Tor the adjacbn; preehaol (£UP 83-04) have not been completed however, fin that the vacant char-ch propQrty nartif of the pre-school and pdrki;iig lot his tietodae overgrok!n with weds and. littered with debris. The iacle of siaintenance for the vacant pardel has resulted fin several costiiplaints #ronr adjacent homeowners concerning dust and windblown debris. IV. FACTS FOR RNPINGS: ,,Tne De.elopment Code�allows, the Planning osea sston rant ./�iE el4 Ig /� tensions for. projects in I2-month increments..* Ri Aera rrave beer,no significant changes in the Ladd Use Element, Development Gade,;aor character of an area within which a project is located that would cause the approved project to become inconsistent or' non-conforifng. Thus, the faVgwing findings,must be met to approve the requeste��,time extension.; ,- 1. That the proposed use is tl ii accordance with the General Piap objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of tie:`' district in which the situ is Tocated. 2. That the proposed use together with the conditions c�pp5.cab1, " '_thereto, will not be detrimental to, the pool is health, safety, or welfare, or materially inwlcu5 ,_ta properties or improvements fn the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use compTtes with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. IV. RECOWENDAT.ION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission continue nis" tw for 30-46 days and direct the church to clear 3 their vacant land of all weeds and debris and,r:weed it with a drought-resistant seed (such as. Southwest Mix #i511. ZR ;tfullytl City Pla ner 98:GG:sgr Attachments: Letter from applicant dated November 24, 1986 Exhibit"A" Staff Report for Conditional Use Permit No. 84-21 Alta Loma Christian Church dated November 28 1984 Exhibit "B - Location Map Exhioit "C" - Master Site'Plan Exhibit "D" - Elevations LT I CHRIS M lCHU QU4M L.rCe,a'ity 1 a4etaa��T_ ' TA } � ALTk'Qi1�X,tCAUfQ t VV � Z�A i , November 24, T986: City of Rancho4Cucamonga Planning �ivt�sai�sr . 9320 Basel i.,ne Rued, Suite C Rancho Cuc j a,, CX "gal7A1 CUP No. 8441 Resoi. No., 84.435 Exp. Date: ill28`E8S ® SubJect: Extension of existing Conditional Use Perw't, CUP 8441 Gentt;men, On November 28, 1984, the Arta Coma Chri:stfan Church was issued a Conditional Use,Permit, CUP, for tint teM_wrary conversion of a single family residence, into a;chUrck.office. The resiaknce tn. question, is crx�etf by, the church ana�`is located in the sout'A=ast corner of'the churctr prMrty. Refer to the attached information for a copy ;of the>,sfte pAlan and a list of conditions in the arigista f permit. Aliso; the,'Chin„hgmembership ;. and employees but attempted to emply:H.ith altl 0 *A,CUP conditions, and to the best of nay knowledge none have been ,�-Zrf-Aed. For the past two Wars, this residence has,�een used as a church--office and 117 has not resulted in a,y, gr..ablems with° the neigh6urs or the coorm ty. However, the'grckh of the church has been much sharer than what was arigfnally'expected. Because- of this slow growth period which we have experienced, the church is formally Mquesttng * two year extension of our�Zonditlonal Use Permit Respectively subm tted, 9 John Gratiaar President Alta Loma Christian Church JG/mz ®RECEIVED CIM OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- ' Enclosure PLAM* ,�..•s,an. .' NOV 2 5 1986 'X8t�1Uull.r:�ls4 6 i tt1'ttttt ! A awdunnrn6r t fe&%a/Np whore ady the Bwefs r� CITY OF R,ANOHO CVGuY1ONGA STAFF REPORT ' _ o x F a z, DATE: Novem. berx, 1984 TO: Chairman_andFMembers of the Planning Commission FROM; Rick 'Gomez, City Planner " BY: Dino Putsiho, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: CON6,1TIO.NAL USE PERMIT NO.. 84-21 - ALTA LOMA CHRI'STIAN CHURCH '- request to convert an exi*sti'ng , ,8 square _fd�otsingle :Family residence into an Ioffice for the,qkta Loma Christian Church on .25 scres of lxfid in the lieriyow Residential District, located at the West side of Sapphire Street, across from ararige'Street APN 1062-332-23, I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Convert single family residence into a church offi',e. r 6. 40wr ose: Provide administr1t3ve office facilities for Alta Loma Christian Church. 1 C. Location: 6390 Sapphire. D. Parcel Size: .25 acres (10,890 sq. ft.) E. Existing Zoninqt Very Lqw Residential F. Existing Land Use: Single Family Residential G. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning Norto LnStltutionalc urch° Very Low Residential South - Single Family Residential,.Low Residential East - Single Family Residential, Low Residential West - Institutional (church), Very Low Residential H. General Plan Designations: Project 51te - ow eR sidential (2-4 dulac) North - Cow ResAential (2-4 dufac) South - Low Residential (2-4 dulac) East - Low Residential (2-4 dulac) West - Low Residential (2-4 duJac) +'t4 My CLIP ,,. Church (j liovembet" page � r fngula %/ , Site_'Characi . - e- subject 1 surroun bhe s ;I adqpPe `3c�n�. f 11h1.e. u+Itatd"onsdTheve�loumeni Bodeserits� Church'.' "n t a�w Ye low+ Wiwi ertLfi i d �ri:ai ci,i r a stuatt►i�e h in tax; oit ' a au y r ati j.lF dudl�+� nasli or inaatiy desiigped�a a3 ra i ` cet"tha ��i use f apt ,o E1? use,,un1 s the Id " ` ,ate;are'R i proved to meao as'�Es soda raqutl^essteitt�."f .a�` of�ce„d�v�loprnaii�• t��� Ih ANALYSIS. A, 8acla round: Qn .0`ciiniaar 1Q, tl-$ irlaining, Com�ftsibn cants itiaxd 5ndi onal Use>Permit 8�r 1 to^,;gibe..iFie� ap licani ample tb re~se. 3ani indii�gtifig the�relai.'itsnsh b"etMee ` the,pr�posed-use a0it e^Master PI'an of the, ria Chritstian - °° an Un Ko0*er 14$. 1984• a, Mi#er Alan `the �ilza Loma Chw mile Churctl incoxp rat�ioga tboe conversl; Qiw the ul jeet single farE: ted 4? ' residepce, i°ritas a ° uatss�igrtcoiFihtetrCondiin nail the Commisvton., T#te,. plan ing.� Permit, No,. $4�21 an instr:l'ted sUff to.drat°,a resolution for approval consideration, µ G. General* The attached resolution reflects. the apO��Tav Of Conditional Use wit No. 8c.21 with conditions of l. These conditions address the fallowing. 1., Conditional Use Pem. 4t Time Limit 2. Hours of Operation Restrictions 3. Signage RNuirements 4. occ'tpancy limitation S. Landscaping 6. Use Limitations 7. Lighting Impacts a. Building Coda Requirements 9" Grading Requirements . Environmental Assategoresment: the proposed project has been det'^'ernt ned t � ical'ly"exempt from the provisions of the California Rnvironmef*al Quality Act (Section 15301, Class 1) in which the conversi6, of a single family t4, an office use will not have a signi€ican'l`Invlronmental impact LCON— ... ^ L.r Page LII. REGOt NDtkT20Ft previous P'Irangin . `Cp�mj�ssapn IX diirection;;t2t`s.re lid that tiie Gornnt`sion reYie�t the atRihetl iisRg'ttfpn2 a teFinine the pro,7ectip ops tstttcy s�ettfi. the:General' P1�a Shoo, tie Cammntssdon support the �lnditn1ns+ lV` and condd.\f gfts .;of apt roFV�l, adop��3ibm of the attaghE3;` Redlut ors"i�otht, ?,e� app,i��, fia ' \\ s �Sutflnttted-, 0- City Planner Rta D?.ns t� A£tac� ents,; Letiv,Airm Applicant = Exhibit �,Ap _ Master Siti Plan _ Exfitbii B , Floor P`1,arr Extftft, "CE -cMevations Resolution �1 l� �i r 7' 3 7 o ICA - t i i �� b• SIC Ul !d j�I I fl wyg4�� �� d A S SJ Its A � I 1 r Ia It o- -4 , In Cilp x�a rdl C+ t r? H•'' Lai�o � ..Umg . 0':Y ; rri PPPP 'F i I. diesel NS a a'rl a»r es 6 srT ri n,Q3"ar a»} ¢a•6'a,s7 arK�•• .> f sae a S Sys @lam - _ _:y fr I. K t—j ra @'ra. � A •er `(-tE -• lS r`t y� � a 52 I�' ��}c j g�,•" mYW: rw � its my m ^+•sr>Yl:..n_ .� � � y� + ]j ���9 '� 4fiQ �•�. Jura <. I•� � � ,l edy �IY I � _�'13 Yn i1 ti a K y r iZ?'. w i7.a Y AT ale G Y.f ';�I: f rm� e� m9 a e� x[qg• y R T lei �:�1.3 ��_�,''} •��} r g t Sa P � � i �'� �> m i m v , ��� n �- iiillll " y - taj,. Q.21 S 8� � E•3 � is�� SITE FLAN CITY OF CUP RANCHO Lr 4✓C NyjOi`1 T1� `rLT �&_LG7C4.-"1 OtaA Hracp NLANNHNG UIVISI0.114T sr, �'°� I •fY'�H �h ..� f r�>�tfVl'A,tk5�g � 'ae+-^ .�•�`Y• ,ft,•l`�j" ,fi r =y s r •;� '- --'� t ai ,,. a f, ""•; t r 'i # /,"�77NtY'T1L� LlDaP� T•cP(CAL n •. .'. fT�'� Y. t .n 4.,• T L i t ••r f t . rn .ate• a.�;°��r"„t��! l � ��'' �"t i ��� '� ' ° ri ` �'. i •'� � ! �'st I/�.�t,ti:t�z#[��• '� sE t.. 1�..3�; L, .�.� i 1 .:t � f n CAST' +aka ` b—Jab TExTumap stucco,TTPICAL 6 ' NBAVY Coves 16TAIN OW To�f',,,C, � ,; '. '• ;. itULTlrI!![rp p/P, 4,DNooL. C'+f-DQnf..TTr*AL '• ...^n r '�,;;. E Illy �� ,i tl � II! - i�+Sdwwa+:f: Iiy. ,t SOUTH ( n " GxlsTll`6 War�a 81PIIJ6• s)usTM6 Wow m=A; J • - SUM. A4 A190VR f STAIN AR ir' 'vR,T'fRIcAL NEW 'tMlRRPROW' bWjgMca: � '• a try /1.i'i.:�. ',li i, (t,IF - � , t'�>a.! , Iji .' , " ...• C"� M*mil 'r n• !'.; � ; i tx ��4\t.} a `t.'4•`.i?' f%,Zi. ..� •ca.�ir ti a;��•� - � WEST ti NcNi'I x 4 'RODUH Pilo TRIM mAT:.ii .MULTII^URI:JOC,/Pl 9GNOC1. OW&; ., • ,:'. ', ;4 -..-._•'•„. STAIN-A9-A6oJe,-T7rICAk :.'•.' .. EXTE(�10(z' EL '� TIO(�I S '. CITY OF rrEvl: (..l fi �4-Z. PLANNING DIVISM EXHIBIT'. " C" SCALE•z1ns-Ta CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA EM DATE: January 20, 1987 ;U rs7x Chailmm and,Members of, the°Rtanning Cometssion FROM: Bead'BulTer, City Planner BY Cynthia.S._Kinser; MMIsUht PlUner SUBJECT: RT;`AI Tk 6EMERAk.?t Alif AttAENDPtENT.8fi=0UA r,eques o: awn €_� p, ener f k. . any an Use,, 4ap r,�s Ft'nod wit , $kTa to> Lour tip fiuW tens-M, t esObnt-r �4-8 dsre? iirngl ur► facie for' acres dt Tan&iro-carted?kt'. the soutiwesi` corner of the, extensions of Banyar sand j ' l C I.' BACKGROUND:..._ At the Planning ComaGssian. meeting of Sep,tkgber. 24.., 1986, i iji Comnission continued thizo item, in order.,that a.i0re detailed stud,'r of the transitfons of Und uses in the, area. 6& co4mpl"eted, 0l,November 12, 198C and'. January' 14y. 196%. the, Col"i:ssfon- contfauea� ,r r this item at the appilv�nt"s requeat lit order for kaufft n!r and Broad,,'. ?X` : to. prepare a conceptual'. master plan for the subject site, a1so11, incorporatip; the parcel adjacent to the loath. tEx(hibit A). The resu-Tt-ina-Master plan �i:xh6ft, "C") would encompass the entire area bounded`by-;;,`nyan,, Mi1Mken,,,:future Route 30 Freeway and 'Deer Creek. It is presented here to illustrate how the site may be developed if the amendment to "ow-Medium were approved for the northerly '--,* acres. ,Exhibit S iliustraties- the existing and proposed density breakdowns submitted by the developer. However, she,Commission is remi=nded that the, only application before it is the land use amendment (the northerly portion of this master- plan). 1t ' should also be rioted that if the amendment were approved, the developer would be under no obligation to develop the site as shown. This staff report focuses mostly on issues associated with the ` suggested master plan. For additional analysis dealing.with other land use issues, please consult previous reports,, also-attached. ITEM H PLC; lr p�Gz�sTO#isS�AF REPORT GPA 85 03J§ -+KA1CgRr Januaryf 28`;.19$7 " page;.2= A 1 - F II. CONCEPTUAL MASTER.ta1AH: The,conceptual pl`ani that has, been prerente&coVers (j2 net acre'�of f# which the;' 22 acres. to the sDiA 'ore: outside* of the asiend lent area- There are.7bt unitts�,n tins conceptual' design for any aVeralT density. of! }784 dwi]i]�ing: uni6ts�'acre; Tf+e ptan� that Kaufman and Sraad has- presenteit>i�s�.simihlarr inn concept to*their devei:op_ent in the Caryn Rlanned#Commun3Z on they emstl sirde,_of°tI�i3T+ i e ;; excmpt that the aVeragei lot:size: ,this proposa!1- ils�,so what As in the Caoln, 0eve7opment; the., northern, portion of` this development contaifns 1¢arger- lats� than that of the s6 tfkrn ` portion.. Then nOnthern: porii�on hasi Tots: 'averagiIng 6,000, square feet, with ty,pit-A lot, di:mensic"ons being 63 feet by, 130 feet. thi's will produce' 146 1"ats for"the;north porti'an with a density of 3'.84. dwelling units'Acre: These,. Tot;dimensions appear consistent with the_Low-Nedium development standards. The southern portion., of the plan has• an average ofo4,600 square foot tots with the average. diieens.tons, being, 45 feet. by 102 fleet. According to the appjlicant;_ this wild produce 149 Pots for a density, of Q 2'dwe;]1 ing unfits/acre. This is a:.lower density than the current DeveTopment, District designation of Medium ,Density Residential (8 - 14 dwelling units/acre), would permit. However, the 4600 square foot lots: da not. meet tha Low-Medium Residential standard of a minimum lot size of 5000 square feet, or-minin„un aye;-age of 6000'square feet. The master plan shows. 11 to 15 foot high slopes in the rear yards of the south facing lotSL which are typically 120 foot deep.. At 2:1 slope, this would translate into 22 to 30 feet being used as slopes in the rear yards. One4undred twentyjoot deep lots, with 32 foot front yard setbacks and back yard sloes requiring up to 30 feet, will have less than 60 feet remaining for a building pad and the rear yard. This will mean Itat, without retaining walls, a substantial portion. of the back ,yard will be a slope-`(see Exhibit D ). This, of course, would have greater impact on the smaller lots. There are other issues that would need to be resolved in this plan, such as double frontage lots and street drainage. The plan dw:; not recognize Banyan Street going through along the north edge of the property and access on to. Banyan would be expected with the elimination of the north _access ion Milliken._ However, detailed site plan review is beyond the scope of this report. _ 1 .'Y ��r A Bb'a'Om K14UFE' -7 *4 1 1 f Theiie are seuera}t apticRs for,"t► Plannin" Gaicr ssion to- ccjsiider at to 's time A. , { Approve fie, hgplp carat%, y request -and, issue a= 4 c Negatvedecar�t�fian for LowMedioe =��y . �,C Resi r t�ia 11,r they 3 ► t s 4" ac asr�d �provixde_ { appropr a, r ctionx as d wha 'sh iia tie donee with`�th�srauthe�r�rn'�.nailtf�of^�tirf�s cance�ptut���p�l�an,r B. Oenyr tn3s appl�icairioru land request sbaf . to � i�nitia�er approprf�ate� a;�end ;ts. As the transitions; of land us=s. has beast an issue from the beginning. the, C�oa�aission, w',itsh 'to await* the; resultts of 4heral Plan Amendment B6 D30 nortswest of, the subject site in ,order to review the-Jan&use transietions at one time. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT-h. ' g. The Initial Study"has, been completed by. staff and no significant l adverse envirowentali impacts were.,considered to be assoctited with M the s-tte. V. FACTS FOR FINO'INGSr �. Should the Commission, upon examtha ion of the General Plan Amendment,, decide that this changg,would promote the Land Use loals and•Policies of the General Plan and would not be detrimental to z the adjacent properties- or cause: significant adverse- "impacts as listed under the Environmental' Assessment, she following findings . are inecessary for approval: A. The Amendment does not conflict with' the Lanes Use Policies of the General Plan; and B. The Amendment does promote the goals of the Land Use Element; and The Ame-ndo*nt-would not be 41�iterially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent,properties. nw- OR+T vr, R:cfl�€camAT zor� Staff is re e�ting ;i ectioh as�to th most, a-ppr,oprfate ; F designatfar ;,f �Che F�'oF Y . 'Reod utfifatts ..are e t ched .fior ttie9 above statol•options ` 13 Respectfully saooikt,ted,, ' city Planner BR:CK:te Attachments: EKhi,bit "A° currentLa6d Use. �abi"t� W, sc�saaX'�y�,nf fl�s,�ties EX Olt"' " Eanewptual Plan: Exhitsi .flR T3%p c t ,*-'-iton}Site Plan Concepts Staff Rep�+rt Septet. , 18 tt Staff Raport - Hove S2, 286 Staff: ary, S�, i987- Resolutiron cf Approval Resolutioe of Genial ih .._� .. ... .. ....v... .,.gym. i..s`:1..,. �:. fi (GPI► 80 03I? LM-4 0 BANYAN ST.: GARYN P.C. u; L is L (11�500— I i.040sgJt. LOTS) I L! k � � . p L. (4,000 — 10000sq.tt. LOTS) w �OThILL/ -� EEWAY y4p. HIGHLAND AVE. LM L VCw LI 1 �4 VICTORIA W VICTORIA CURRENT � LAND USE NORTH D SIGN TI NS EXHIBIT , r 1 .! 5 " E EXISTING PROPOSED i f ALT A) , 1 I° (Wf FC changed to L as 3d.udac end M as 11 dulac) EAkn� 114du 146du 38,n 3 Rza r 264du 149du 24ac 24ac 12ac 12ac AVG., DENSITY 6.Ddu/ac AVG. DENSITY 4.8dulac 25% HIGHER THAN PROPOSED NORTH LOTS 3.84dvlac: ALT A SOUTH LOTS 6.2dv1ac I r EXHIBIT--E , _�,�_.__..err i►� r.j ��: PR MihJ Y Oi \Y• U / C' A®1N CONCEPT' �� R? T 4 .7 � ,on^ .�pY aitiCe�i �DIY .1Flo1� �1 :DD a 1{ t r. as t tQ/ ga iz ta' L rSf 11 4 ,,. to SfT' PL,�ifU C06�CEPTS - CIT'i OF RANCHO CtrU.-A.MONGA STAFF REPORT 01 DATE: January, 14, '1987 _ �, s} tetr 70: Cha4irman and!Members of ;the planning C ission FROM: Cynt ho;u S'.. Klmser. .Assistant Platv►er SUBJECT: ENI,VI-R0_*t PAIL ASSESSMENT AND GEte" dL, PLAN,AMEhiMIEW H-03A re(_ � o awn enerau . ,an �anci�lTse roar Fled Control! to Low-Med unt. Density- Resfidentiiasl (4.-8 dwl un$tsyfacre) for 40. acres:of land located at the southwest corner of the extensions of Banyaft ,anal; Milliken - APN: 201-271-55. ,r I. BACKGROUND: At the Planning Commission mreting of Il 12, T T'r-9 Homes withdrew, their, involvement in this• Gedarid Plan Amendment and Kaufman & Broad now represent the owner. lauf►rtan d Broad proposed to incl�poratethe lower 27 acres (Exhibit of designated as M2ddiium DeWAty Fasidontial ' (8--14 dwelling units/acre), with the sub3 =sn =:tf" 4Q acres to create Al conceptual master plan of the 10 acres. The Cow ssion continued this General Plan Amendment to January 14,. 1987 in order that a conceptual design be prepared. II. CORRESPOi�jNCEi Kaufman & Broad have requested that this itei be con Tnu "to complete' the conceptual master plan. A T,;tter (Exhibit "All from, Alvin Kaufer confirms their request that tW-s General Plan J ndment be continued' to January 1987.. III. Rfe"E DAT 0 i' Staff requests that the Planning Comi lion grant con ua c o this- General Plan,Amendment to January 28, 1587. Resp ctfull s' t�'1�fr r Brad Buller City Plann r' BB•CK:vc Attachments: Exhibit "A" Letter from Alvin Kaufer Exhibit "B," - Subject Site and Maste- Plan Area Staff Report cf Septe r 24, 1986 Staff Report of Hover ii jz, 1986 t? l5`M+c K cuaummk.o4L?x.a,fixt r-T x TMIp+'C',p^� � 11MIP4?Y'Fi AI'!7"fi.CltiRf Vdt MIN � 'Sf c �a..se sdn ioue�Ea� R,�' aiXT �i0 aax rpmN - Stitt tw eAR O 3i YTC H f nto2tEti' E . arGw CM �lOs:'�1;Da__ iYQs�;1iNl16L"ItO 6�l:4F#Nf, k aGOY1�flBa#i.. ,• ikaswkth7 n p Aai 1,a►i ; Ulsi s•a»aaoe< - rE� Nq++�+taialto:wogr i9 ��- b �! - opawar,couwr.- 541TC.3.60 � �1441?�aOC 1 ' 66D TOWN CEM7EIr,Di4.Vt¢ eea� ` qy.1([[tf 9rtfs�n �. ;. e^fi��;� CD4Tfl MS9a;t+M4FSEN�Yb4 ,Y {r r b'C!:/.'.a 6. S'0 *�A�W trR+1'Ci44�YYlar ° l7Wi♦�ip•�X70• ."'.yt;2�' n wairfe4s�Dlpcetv!'waiac "y Gui.r C F7£}� !1' 'l tir Brad iaulle �. 0020 Saaed ac, Road f Poa-t Ofa�ceki B bx, OW, Mancha Cucamangr►r, �ltfrnia �IY3'o4 ^4 Dear Fir* ` _ `rI'i W cOtt� u,IIi 'j iLlSCI1LBI��i-• �38 s our request for a Gei:etal Flan Amtr3ine,- magi cMn, uuaa - Janu ary Z S. 29,67 r x ATvin . 4. 1, LA-2>0413Q/ASK/mCm r CC: Mr. Quo Krout-,i.l A a� .ter y xy f y �J�kacsE�r, ALI r:�5inmown!, r,t rt � ti: C.I'I*Y OF RANQ� CU'G MONGA t 5 REPORTCd o' DATE: Bovembar M. 1986 19r� > ' Tl.I: SWairmn land Members cif the Planning Comission F90m: Brad 3ui Ter,,lit planner $P �' Bf: Cynthia Vnser, Assistant Planner 'j Y. SUBJECT:, EM['IROMMKTAL'ASSESSMENT AND C,5liERAt PLAT,;AHEM MEMT$b-03 �=C _ P reQues dnteno a eriera an an h Asp ap r Food Control `!q - Low-Medium Density Eetfdential,t:j,4-8 du/ac) 'for 40 aert+s of ;l and l ocatii at v the, southwest corner of the extensions,,, of Banyan and !` ken AFld 201=271•r5, I. BACY.&RCIiIHD: At tf9e Planning 69QIssio:: me0tina.-5f September 24, 3 a request by Laing Howes_ was presented to redesignate. 40 ' acres of land on the sojthwust ,orrAr of 'the extensions of Banyan a►d.'Milliken from Flood Control'to 6w-Midi w Density Residential (4-$ du/ac). At this rsee *�`v, con ern was raised as to thesmost. appropriate designationI land in relr"tion to surrounding, development and land uR *aff was dirocted to re-examine,,the f. area and ctme back wit` atailed'infonm tion. ' ;. a . II. ANALYSIS: The subject site (see Cxhibit "B") .,b.`• currently ,.;; 3e�i g d Fl;�od Control; due to the cuannel i zi ttg of Deer Cret x, th4k site fs no longerr subject to floadinq and may now be considered. for development. For more dEtail of the site, see the attache__' Staff Report, F Ir the.iolicwing uescr.iptions, eeftr to Exhibit "A�. To *,fits z.:uth cf the subject site, the land: is vacant and currently desl#iftaced as Mediumr 'Density Residential (8-14 du/ac) on' the Development Wztrict Map. The General Plan Land Use Ma ;;shows the site as a ,proposed high school. The propo:._d Footh01 Freeway 'A: qs appr.)ximately 1/3 of the proposed high schoai site, 'Which does not leave enough land for the high school. At, .this time-; s however, the school district has Indicated that a site' alu-acevt e a freeway is not Cesirable,anti that iwre appropriate sites art'. Currently under consideratioff. SautEmast Qf the site the l anci is vacant and 4esi gnated as-Nedi um ,fie as'ty Residential. The ad;acent property being Medium-High (14- u/ac} with to approved tract cf 308 condominium units, 4 w � H c `� EP �T Y General Pkln +enw d5 ti3A1` 9 Hqu� 'er`1 I 40p �1 ;and west of the s to ifs designatted Low;. 'rdiu�a S��,i dent3�i.andR �h� �- site i's�' ae�lnc. ��cA trot th 4s sits the pr ay fix edesiirgnaated ior+t-lted,L�ar a"ndE;lraan approved i eat for 3 si,nglie fa�iiaX uaiits; The na .�west property is :acmR'� Currt� resnpttdELovr� Yled u� 'DLnsfP yr Rs iCderrt al. "'' P hi str � cur�reret l under coy sidee�aton frr a Nand}usec'eanef)3lla `rarL�w=MediPraa�ta Low Dens t" RPsi de��t'" f 2t du/as`)�' izenere l'. *m4e, .,t` 86-om has Der r contk hued t t Jagumry, I North and nor Beast°'og tip substi-4 S111te is Vacant ands desii(gna*tgd as Flood C'ontrgIj, the Taff bewhonge�toothe san Bern`ardi�no Go!friiay3 Goo Contral! District :.and m. 'be capable. cf tefng 'dsveLaped, fa the y; futur_e:, TM C'aryn' Planned. Cowtittfty, is to the east of the si t2.. The land is designated ds kow, density,Resi'deniiart.with S, -x1 square 1t foot lots, fob an a�rages of 1,200'• zquare fact i is `orth of the. spine road snd 4a.000,.-TA 000v ` .' Rga faotdts south: cf the 'Spine read wi an a�era a a�} S,:IGO� qumre foot*lots. f III. USE ALTERkATIYES The Commissiiammay car'isider cfol-lowin�"as poss€tle designations for whe-_s�lb Pect site,-, 3. FlFood. Control: This is,;'the current designation of t'a"Land: e; Na —'may r ai;A{_ itF� this d'esigoation, but-as the land: is na longer required For flood control use, . change will eyentuall,y occur. _ .2. Low Density P.esi'deniiial' ("L-4 duJ'ac1: ' change Lo this r esigna ov tel a cons s en we , ;and use: to the east-in .'. the Caryn-:. +ginned• Comity. However, there %ay. te snsne ` co atibillprablem with the land to the south, currantiy designated Ml ON Residential (824 du/ac), unless that parcel is alsa reconsidered. 1r 3. Low-Medium Dsit:/Resideni~ial ;(4-8 du/'as): This designatios, ?{ s re;ques vy, tne app can ano 9s cons stent w€thi current designations to the =west:, and: northwest, ana`compati bl a with other existing designations, in the i5aediate area. 4. Medium," 0ens4ty Residential (8-24 du/ac): ghis would be cow,;s enm tie e, 'g'N ons- t snu:fc' and southwest, ~ but�` ess compatible,wit;ti1 and,:to the east. t ' i j SP S FEIN RBFORT ft ki ?� IV.:, RECDt!iBENRAYtF�OH. Staff, is requpiR,91 �.retion a to the cost ' appr p °a,e Corr e'd ect sateand base alter e a lo©d Coa rod iCS p ofAred>, a es al'. Ain 'al s pp opria e ;: 9 a Law oo rre�oz en my, Reside - p rimed, 0D t Rssa l'U11Q L of�Denial an a request fare` c rg to brout 'Fpdnthe neaft ene,a flan S r= >; cy>rl� l�` appre 1 t ;fthe� i s�enn'ref�F �a�L� eCi�ism fr Den�it'�``R d sit $�r�pewhe apl�nts ►taQUest,�thPn e i 'Mega sae Dealandappro al of he; attael�e� Reo'°oftiopllof APprovfF.,,�oulc� .� PP�"c g`a t ,17 /t ram+ r, Res" url,y° Brad BUT wv, City Planner BQ-CKdr i Attachwents. Exh��hit "A° « Cxisti.ng Land Use 92sipations 0evel ep nt b��stri`ct �'General Planqw staff.,jSpor't �epte aer 24, 1986. Resol coon of Appr oval ; Resol uti�f Denial 1t. AL 1 ` r4Jr4 ' ;a" k. e� ., y f �y ��« a .�^ 'r Y r .:..:. .s.. .. .. �' °' is r ,_ .. i .,, �; s �� ���, 1 r�..�ss `�'4. e r � � _ +f tefi � Y y r'' ry�c � _ :� .., .�� � ��' � Y �•=s .. .. .,� L �,:•{ a� �.,� ���_ . •_ •' 4 �, lrr �- � ��:�" �a a `,;i � . . ,�.� �: �� M 4 F � ,��. ,, -. -. �, � � ' ... � ] !.. COMMUNITY . _ .vy j 771 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA cA. .$TAFF REPORT ✓ATE: 'Septleeber 24, 198 '�� 1977 TO: Chairith and gagers of theJ,fPlanning,.Cmfssior. FROM: Brad Buller,, C1ty Planner BY. ' Cynthia S. Kinser, A3sisCani P3anner SU811ECT: 'ZWIRDNM k'TAL ASSESSMENT AWD GENEWL 'POWAMEONENT 86413A 'll?d► - A reques - aman erG`enera ars and' Tse, ' Flood Control to L ias Density: 11 Reoidenti s(4-8 tkatac) for-40 acres of Iand located at the saauihweat corner of VA extensions of Banyan and -` Mili:fken -AN W1-27t-56, , ABSTR.'�T•, +Laing Hoes :;his initiatedthis-Geoera.l Plan Amendment *� r�m� ral Control to Li6v Nedium-Demity Residential for 40 acres Of laP-f locatac< xs the southvmst`corn' of the extensions of 86hyan anii= Milliken (:see Exh-tbgt 99). Staff ;has completed an Envirommntal Assessmt' rnd analysis of, ',.fie proposal and r-ecomends approval of the"A",dimn'4 II. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTIMI*. R. Action Rekueste6: Amend the General Plan Land Use Map from FFG—a �"d` tr`o"T to Low-Kedlum Residential. B. Location: Southwest corvaew of the 4xtensions of Banyan and WMVen. i G. Parcel Size. 0 acres of land. r, D. W-Gtingr Devr$lopment District: Flood Control. E. F:xis, tin9 land Use: Vacant. a F. Surryunding Gsrseral Plan Das % tions: arth - Flood o n rroo l. South Proposed,.sigh s hodl, Floud vantroi East Low., ne"nity, Rbsidenrtial. West - Low-ftdium Density itesidential, G. SurroundIn2 Land Use and %veLopeent District Designations: aran, FTWoT"C3-nrd1I `. South - Yacant, Medium,,Density Residential. East - Single 1aa�ily resldential Caryn Planned Co�at'76ty. West - Vacant,; Flood Co,,�trol,. �� ,M PLAWNING GOFi�ZSS3 ,`S_fArr,. PORT GPA 86 03A,, !j, 'IW ° Page.2 H. site Characteristics,:. Vegetation consists of scatte►id"trees, 41 grassesa, a are: s�;oth�rw se vacant. G III. GENERAL PLAN Al�EMD�tEhtT t1NAt.YSZS 1, Flood" Controls The General, Plan Land Use Clap designates the{^ prole s e<as Flood Contctt1. The purpose of"this obsi-gnation is to pr+eser isi 1'a is particularly subject,to,flooding s and for pim ictian in other areas due,to flooding. Tile General Pi an statasa " . portions-;of the,City fall within the 100 year Flood Pi Which is "an area of J"and subject to potential inundation . a stars whose intensity occurs on the average of" nce every 100 years." L "Upon improvements to both ,Ncampgri Creek and• Deer, r Creek, floor hazard areas" will be significantly. E. ' diminished 4st of Milliken Avenue Floodwaters in the City have seriout y damaged hoses,'' vehicles, and roads, f as well Las threatet3ed. luxes. tii3reaver, .0e "debris and AOk " soil carried ny the' flood graters" are �o i.ted al, local streets, private yards, and driveways, resul., _in significant maintenance and repair costs." The .Deer Creak Channel has been completed a9t according to the Federal Emergency Management Agtho, ;she project site is no longer subject to flooding.- The land is p,;iH4tely `dwhed And and may be considered for developent (see Exhibit "D"). 2. School' .Facilities; %Since the area immediately adjacent to the subject lte'iWjj s hated as a IJotentiai' high school•on the Uae,�-al Plan, staff has 'contacted the Chaffey HijS" School District for co ants. The District indicates primary intoseat in anoeher general location, but does express putotial. interest i;i -:.he subject site as a secondary choice (see Exftlbit""C°) ; An issue is whether the subject site should;-retmin its. current Mood Control desigration or whether it shc,:ld 'bee rednignated for sow fora of devel6pftnt. The sit6 is privately' "", no Icngersubject to flooding and not nwded for flood control,,parposes. ' The ao0i4rant is requesting a Lax-Medi��n Density Designation. The School Dist,-ict l is not requesting that the site be reserved as a sciml-at this ciixe. Should the CiV approve the: proposed LN Designation, the High'Schoal District will have aleother opportunity to coment, if and when a, r subdivision sap or A &wl:cpment project is filed for the site. At that time, the District would have;ft option of pursuing acquisitio �' of the site if the pripu y'lAcatioa is qo longer amiable.; Sep'ceiahi e 19 S .--�. Page 3 • _ �? 3. larrd VOe�-__in 1�bi��41y the s1€a i a aceni~ to Lori and for Medi�u�a ens, ya es en °a, w,tic iKedi�u9r nS along Hghlanr: t Avenue ra the 'future -�ut+� 30 Freeaa n T f dS;;!. taon of lore, I Medfua Density Res3rc ntiat app+grs co pati�btse with the ad acar 1 r ; uses.. Tile=Genera tan di»•.,asses;this:use as f®dads,: .Ldudaretling` units per grass acres) 7'he OWN u c g4r. is charactsFi zed. by resi dential . ' t denser��s, ds � g ati� tharo tyt� I1 densi y resid tOi % gebug' kith Fgross dens�lf�ies,., arYeragii�g +�et�aei}n 'S 8 dwetst+itt�,g� �ni�ts p ;acre, cMMAlera'bly more tousling i~rs� be used, #ne7udima�[ 'tyQ#cl single= M fatally, glefihta• xero 1=oi4 dine„ itulsex,,'and.ugder k_ certain condititns�to to 4_4 tgrmtao�se t}� units. This R category,+eaud be apropr#ate wi`t]tiin low density areas to = epcourage greatar heusfng, diversitg without changing the, `�` sss►igi°t�faai�y Character of ttrg sur•rauniing residential chyracter:�° IV. ERVIROMXT,AL. W ,the Initial Study' has been compre y"�"6 -'s. n ae� no significant adverse environmental impacts ziere considered to 6e associates with the si'to. V. FACTS FOR r FINDINGS: Should the. Coamlission, upon examination of the. 1 Hers aen n , nt decide that this change would promote the Land: Use Goals and Policies of the General Plan and would coot be dstrimental to the adjacent properties or cause;afgnificant averse impacts as listed under the,EnKtron�ental AsseMent�' ;the fol'io`ong findings are necessary Ior approvalr. A. The Amenduent does. not conflict"with the Land Use ' Policies oil the General Plan, B. The Amendment does; promote the goat s of the hand Use Element, and C. The Amendment wound not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. VII. WRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in foie a y eacrt .iewypaper and notices. were sent to all property owners ws nn 00 feet of the subject site. ''o date, 'only the aforementioned response frog tite Chaffey School District has been received. cw -fiAREi�DRT r: GPA 8 Z: ES° l; Septe�be Z41LA 1�9I <, VIIi. RECDMMAMON: Staff redo€ Qnds approval o, the Genera,1 than Awten3�en as�. Tppose w' „ r tht Ovanning„ -00M scion Finds the:�wendrwent warvan ed� adopti"one of t `� att Gh d R seIru ion reCowen.,dinS A,Prou ;t4 tf 2`fity Gdunc�l 6f tW'@chart".Firm Ao-"6"' nt and issuance of ..a Nec a irve; Derll�aratfcn i6j.1 oe appx'oprtate. ufi thew Plagning Cg�wif$sion i .nds that atPie requested_i4�eipd00 V.. fin conflictkte hand'tise Poli¢cias of the Genwrla plfann doe��rlot ps^ of t4 s*Coals and 03 ec�ci es of :t l:an¢ Use Eel;+went, a's�pf.,�on Of ttle' �' attached-Eesoluti�onof Aaniai =�u"hd be app:�gpYiata, Re fiul1�: EE`' c City Planner 9B:CK:ko i,. Attachments: EOibtt •A" :- Sutk ect Properrt, Erihfbit'B" 11'%eral Plan A Devei,�pm nt Dfttrict$ Ethih t "C- letter frawr Oaffey School District ;�eslk'ytion of Approval Resolotinn of Venial .ty ; i { I •iS . y b�{ 4 L No x �k Act NEI it .A� V 16 a _w 1 CUB tiq Subject Property(75,acret) Pro rtv Aff*' Pe ,c2ed by C.FA 11L PLAN" P, w SFM PLAN < JQHWH .I All . S .�" ege IK WR UMMMW r 5 .. INI: ... e's t ,tK hnkor' L, cenere! tlaw YL Aim .� LMIV j UO cARYM _._ TLANNEI: rgap L. ILM N " L i VICTORi OL Development Districts NORTH I i, 07 Y O ITr at: lay.•�, -; RAINCHO CL;CANIONGA TrrLEI PLANNING_7INIIIRON EXHtMr + ' 4 Ti.T x µ CA, LD 2t vvr.0I•FIrfM W,Rgsr,'oN1tj M,C14UVORNii9t.749416908 • {' 4�8�651t sw�,_OMMc�; O t6 a�eo�f S000W AAmdmoe�iaa Sup&*t*:*m wSura nundento ¢Mni Smoa{rwa � wtta`�itl` •kart`" r ,.; d!S t R��,�✓ aOM WTFAMU:Kmt4m e.Mnley•en c •A.xnaa a Swic r chew .CiIAxa W.wcu 1 . f Septe,roben S, 193.�r� Atan Utmen, Aabociati Ptannen r MY OF`RANCHO•CUCAMONGA P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cugaewnga, ,CA 97730 RE: Ge►eAat Ptah Amendment 8643A \\ In tuponae to ga. Laaa Un4ngeh'4 tett�,o�4ug"t 13, iW a Reading thy_WpeAtit og 91ttiken noitth od_Highland -- the beat;knaw Ai,we coat gave y/u U.that .the Cha66eg Dicattiet i6 eo"ide Ling anotheA ).uope�Cty MA �i ji"t once but that .the MilGiken pRopett�! would atilt be fonaf�jeked ahautd au'-, 6taat aice not an out. Be advised that me we to become mate xnteae.ated & the Mittlken paope ty :iit 4, would be the noathean jg w. tty avAes, ptua oa minwith no inteaeat in the zouthekn poxtiunr i wi.6h we could be mane,z.a4is.ic in out Aeaponae. Sincenety, STEPREN L. SUiTERS niaectoA G,?ainea.a Seavicea - Np oivis ON�MQA PEA NNIN-Cl A SEP O g 198E 7ts,Jlwttl!!?tj1104{� S!B%sb 16 cc: Alvin 3'. RauSeA IA fIG!lOOIT: KTX.lOSfq•CHXfp'NAbULY Fbl1CAACN a GN+tF$6Y.•p/.pAjW4-yXrE7TMANOA•AONTGLAA.tlNiAH�O•v!'tXN[7 s Y+1tltY YSW ` _ r S C ty I NOR II CITY Of, rrr.%t. . 86•e3 + TI`Ut :ram PLANNING UIV SION El'I ii13iT '� � r � . 0 -� .. . �: _. Y� RESOLUTION NO. REStT1UTr*0 , :THE PLANNING. GOMMIFSSIOM OF THE CITY DF RI►NEHD, CUDl9, NGA GALIFQRNI+A,. RECOMMENAING• APPROVAL. OE I� , ,GENERAL' PLt4N AME _ NO Sti-n3AAt Ad+9EENDI NGit E XRENT OF THE RAMC i�Or G�A GENERAL PLAN:'FROM ElOOD CONTROL ROl f l TO' LOB ME[tILR!i FQR 0,`ACRES, LOCATED4 ATt°THE � MMIkLYEN IFxE�tISOUH APH`� 201-27r1 55,`. v WHEREAS. the P lannin Coi�si�ss�i�rn has 1td° a dul! � v . . ,g,, he y ad ertiised publ is •;i hearing to consider, ali, sc ents the`.propasek)General P1-1anr Amen`0*t No.. 8&-OVA. '} SECTION, I: ,The Rancho Cucaii..4ga• Pianni.ng C-omission hereby slakes the follow ng zsn 'ngs'; (f ,' A_ The Amendment does not conflict with thn Land Use PaTicies: of,the.General,, Plan, B. The Amendment,promotes goals! of the Land Use. Element. r; Aft C. The,`,Amendment woulA, not be: materially inj'urious or detrimental to the acuacent.Properties. SECTION 2:, The General Plan Land Us! Map shall be amended as follows: Assessor's.Parcel' 201-271-55, a 40 acre parcel of land located on the southwest ' corner of Wilton and Milliken (if extended) shall yi changed from Flood Control to Law-Medium Density! Residential (4-8 -; dwelling units/'acre). F SECTION, 3: A Negative Declaration is hereby recommended for adoption by ate CTiy Council for this: General Plan Amendment, based upon the completion and findings of the Initial Study.. !VOW', THEREFORE,, BE IT RESOLvEO, that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning CammiSsirr.-.does hereby recommend appeoval of General Plan Amendment No. 86-03A to the City Council. �I APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JANUARY', 1937.. PLANNING COM14ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I r P N s ESOL TrIk3t , t. GPAx 50 AP E. Davirw Bafterr c� d,,1Y11SaM.T— ATTIEST.,, if ' 1 I„ Brad 8ullerr ut = S retary of the Ptantbin, Cosy#�s itgn of titer G tty< of Rancho Cucamanga�, herebjr cert*fy tha ,the forego#Ind Resnt't r fl eta gdul r.and regularly i:ntraduc'"d; passe& and a ed��bye the"PsT�aon,��n`g r C i�n►issico of the Ci1ty, of Rancho Cucaarangar at ja r guj�ar eeti -of, the.;Piianfif Co i'i[ssiCn� he,1,d y on the 28th day oIIRS anP#VW;,,1487. b�. her fiot�l�iix mg vats to w,i t. v, AYES1l/" C P9I STOfI RS: NOES: coi+ 11;Ssl ONE RS:, 'X ABSENT: COMISSIt1NERw: u f •� i L J, r R SOLfITI0 NO.. v t / A.RA4d E14�N1h1� E C NNxN6 ;�1 xf3SlOPl .al TD CZP! DF NIMG EdIACF TU F A,, RE ?R:SOEUT O Q ' 4� jk. DF'YFfE, kl�A14FdCA" GENERAL, �� ` . . Ai;RES aF [AAr ,',OC�A� T" £H Witt O"ORN OFl. N��' MICL7ltENr� 1F EXI HD S01-27F-56 WHEREAS,: the lsran6fli%0ow3;ssjbm has held a duly ad16rtised publf�, hearing to consider ail cons ont the proposed Generat Piiaq Am .odiaerr't Na.-r n 86-03 . SECTI.OU I.: the Rancho Cucamoonga'Pianni'ng Con dssfon cannot slake the. ' foilowfng n Ingsu 4 kt A. The Amendment does not, conflict wfth the, Land Use PoIlfctes Of the General Plan. 1 B. The Amendisent promotes goals of the Land:Use Element. ` C. The Amendment would not be`wer3,ally injurfcus or detrimentaa to the adjacent properties. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT-RESOLOiM. that the Rancho ;Cucamonga Planning Conwissfon does hereby recomend denia1� of General Plan- Akendrdent No. 66-03A. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 2$I'll DAY OF JANUARY,, 3987. PLAKNIIiG C MISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC'AMONGA BY: t E. David Barker, a imam " a ATTEST: - I Brad Buller, Deputy zWfdtary f /y .l ,; 4 \ s I, Brad Bull PYseCrear o ,.,,lte PI�an Coaassion off, , g r �. r�, J� Q tFt'e City 3 a Rancha'L`Gaca�aorg8 Ner�by ce a fa r l:a he fore 1 arrd ' s gin,wad Y'pgularly iC ,,t'o,iar.ed�rsse Coaaais t�o�ri> of the Cif o Rane6bCu�a � a,� ai:a gts3ir` e� ing4'ofhekAl'aig�Las�tsi"s ,i!or, Meld ` on the Z$ t day Q ,: 8nitary, 1g8 ; ray, ., f,�4lto?yir.8 V,ae ��� • MES: c�omI rSSIOK"ERy`� a N€IESs CtkfiISSIONERS.. Y.r ASSENT: CmL'SSIokigs . a I I 7777 a _ — CITY OF RA.NCI O CUCAMONGA cU�M, �. STAFF REPORT v F Z DATE: January 28, 1987 ;:, 1977 TO: Chain"- n and P-ambers of the .Planning Commission FROM: Brad idler, City Planner Alan Warren, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVl�tO;iA' N7AL.JKSS�SSFiENT-AWD..GENERAS•P6 tM> A"tiN[3MENT 87-OIA °�`� �' a�Tis use eTeen ;o t e -cneral Plan,frcxn.office,yo Reit7►er Low Resfid ntfifia _ f2,-a dw Ming' units/acne) or :.ow•fedI= Residents W" dwelling units/acre? for 1.1 acres of land at tine northeast earner of San Bernardino Road and Carneitatt street - APN: 20�-04-09, 32, 60, 74, and 77. I. ABSTRACT: As a result of Planning Comission direction, a--city n a e application has been filed t* consider changing the land use designation of the northeast corner of San Bernardino, Road and 5 Carnelian .from office to either Low ar Low-Medium. Residential. The Planning Commission should determlme if' either residential land,,zje is more appropriate than the existing office designation and 'Y%,cward its rocoamendation +o the City Council. 11. BACKGROUND Julys, 1986 the City Council requested that certain o ce professional sites be studied, by the Planning Commission for possible General Plan Land Use changes. One of those sites was the northeast, corner of San Bernardino Road and Carnelian Street. The Council did not give any specific alternative• land uses to be considered, but requested that the Planning Commission study the sites identified and provide recommendations to the City- Council. In its review, the Planning Commission voiced concern over the < potential use of this site for office development. This concern` was due to the traffic volume on Carnelian and Vineyard and potential difficulties in accessing the site. Ir, addition, the site is bordered on two sides by residential land which caused the Commission to raise land use compatibilit%f concerns. It was therefore recommended that this site be ci;asidered for General Plan amendment to either Loam or Low-Medium Residential. s 4 ITEM I 4 "F R aN C °F,RERt7` 51 GP! 8 kW� JGAMONGA, rage M. SITE DESCRi',Rt A. Lobitforg, Northeast carrier of San Sernardiina goad and ' ameFfFang Au�nuer' N,., .Aegar.• ' kacres. (6 Oarcelaslt ' C: 5urroundi�ngp lands use;and�Zonang• Hurd ng aaa es nah, �L" (Lowz i-4,dwelTi�ng South Y&CAn „ - (r nA�;at1� Goa eroira F East +}avant °`3:�4" (1ow=tedium; 4�8 dw4 ing. units/%acre} "kl2st - SirigTeF�a i7y AiNtdet►ti�a'T "M" (tted3umr 8�]4y �l fings uni.ts/�acre�)`• D. Ge ieral Plraw 4esignattots Off North, - ow; (t -4 dill*ing units/acre), South c dime a�T ` £ast tow-Me,diva- 4"8` R.4ng„urft&/? vre) _ West - ,Caw ts'2^- diTi. units/'ecra? E. Site Charaa- er=stics,: The site its generally.level, rt="th sl i•ght s rope .o sou.- W. At the baundary kith the sinQ'�,fiamiTy lots tat the* north there is: a grade difference- of 1,-It,feet. Approxtn-telly 15 mature trees extst on Oe sate, ailong; with two small' single famiV residences,with garages. IV. ANALYSIS: Staff analysis will vender on three.sigdificant issues onhee Mind use gpestiop`ore as follows: a. Co atiWi 0 With Wrroundi 'Lana uses and DesT gnat ons• itner ow,or ow- wou comps e_ thee 'adjacent land uses of like destoatfons (L b LM). The. Lox-Mediun designation would farm a logical I progression of density from the L properties- to the north I and it would open opportunities of master planning the { subject properties with t6 vacant LM property to the east. At a Tittle over 1 acre in site:, the site eihibits.' some inherent design difficulties for a standard 'single t family subdivision due its limited size and location on the corner of atertal and collector roads. Any residential 1 � 177W PL C $EtRT �pA � � CG9AM0 'v 3 ,v page,.3 de en �wo04 have sow difficuYty ad e at,�sfbu f�2r **Merits to..' Vk ast' ofdact'.r�aadwaj+s. tached R+ ts, rri�th cluster �un�. would alfbrd es tor, a uc he k, Y , effea -- ,t fa�t%,tc �►olisse anA act iity� �� 5t� �s��ati e sidee �i�i dPYelbpr .t,a uii nl 'rAb'a♦ sa ib�le Cith= the exts�aing� 's��n��l�e afam�, ne�ghb" drhTo j�` �a �wou1C� ��"an �'!: di s�riCt� ��nt addi�iron a.mastera�H��n'ig, op��iratu�i=t�,dcsds. r, :. ei�i�st�°ng�'�:,cti�str#'e� to the�riorth�is a'1'ready da�rel '� 6enep&�"��,�offMiGe des`grtations`_��% be spp`ra�ri te; frg propert esr_ficYef gxhi6h�tdevalei dffic�titfe, �antl are' on tts ri;nges mf ca M_Mal aseas,� as its th :SIX Off�i'ee� uses are i radi ,ssna]3 °dons,ldeoad approp fate it l an d. 43 but%m betweehtu 14tip?a #a 011V OWN cgikt'sr and cretaldevel ptaets, Thy. 1QGation of ptf cep:uae fatellyx: aaGet t .;the s~ilg}ei?a��FE yeses "cantbe r Inccpatifia u4k1eSr:'.extensilve setbact���+ar�,pravide� Tkiis des}ign�feaiwure °nat&e poss+ibTei;n phis Case sudl t the l�mteie of t ate. �, b. Traffic d�isa t; 31?e Planning; Coa�issio�t.voiced lic6ftern over po n Al r traffilc Rr..ab�,est5w for thl� San Bernardino arneliaN iGltersectiar1 If an office dev.11o nt were'to'tie deveToVed The-,folViy.Ling is a gertarasl laa`fysts air the deueloprsent potential using curh nt .ttraffic generation ratios and resulting traffic counts: k Existing traffic counts: San Bernardino 'Road 3200 average dailyi trips (ADT) Carnelian/Vfneyard 19,000 average daily trips EADT) E Estimated traffic generation by land use; Loa (maximm 4 duelling units at 10 ADTtun#.) = 40 averasi daily trips. Loa-Medium Nr:xirmum 8 dwelling units dt 7.0 ADTjunit) 54`average daily trips. Office (assuming 11,50G square feet at, 11 ADt/1,000 square feet'; 121 average daily trips. ii Tom_ 7 Pi.R}6�I "tOt! � hFF REPORT { GP/t?$ I+R➢ �IrTY D RRNCsHiA CUGEIi90HGR Januarys 231g8?� P..age 4; �Th��' pi � fil= Tdusealterntive, would cl"ry'result a inI�essfi i rai fig generatian ispe develapnterit of the properties, C. Ca ncjr w1it Geneka�l Plan `Goal°5 agc PdIMj;. lesa The errera a�fat4 a spvera o ec,xves rega�^ mg orgy�zati aIancrses, in,° the ctyT'ese po7iai�es� efCai;rag•e d�vecsfixty�;. taAcchdi3ftaaV�e�dgfe r.t'siwI�G`ryai*'lReddsi`'dieannt�ls; ting,3criiteriiabwe � use's far La ow- it �r area dscussedF as} fZlorts "Lowy4 ,4�dwe176g Ourtits/gross acref)F The- Low DensY Res3denti° ,cl'assification ilst chars;teriz d b l�ngjle f� tesnes. the tJnsiy i apaoritfiFtare the tral {tionaT� rteighbarhaoo d Arai. of detached° sii%I-e am isy, 'unirtg'prAva�ils; and there 06 level of serviced fincludiimc roads, sEiopoing, ands rear."eat on are note sufti9ie�►t `CO-0sfty' .higher^. den`s,'i'tY " "Lahr Meth+uoa t44= dwef ins t r it /gross acres The;Law- ' um, categQ ies clraraater#dd; by;, resiGdenti r �dertilt,;$pp. s'ot 'at greater`$haiv Vie Low I DenOttes Resildedt�A jr.d , tiTirtir grpas s 601, ies aver4giing m between t-9f 4well"i`ng uni'ts�acre;,. con�'144rabl'y `more housing-' types m as used;,,inclluding typical Ongle famigi sin4;* faeily zero let Tllne� duplrex, and under certafn condi'tioaa up to 4-6 townhouse Upt ugfts.. k This category wouTdGbe appropriate w-ithtf a Low Density area as to- encourage greatiter housing diversity without changing the, s:tngle family character of the surrounding residential character.' The General Plan objective regarding office uses provide ( for the following: "Integrated complexes shall- be encouroged to provide >_ J areas where related and support dffi;ce uses can be located. -tie intent of this land use category is. to prevent the ` proliferation of individual iso:l-ated offices. Commercial uses permitted, withirs the office category include administrative and professional offices;. business support serv'ce<;; ffnancial,, insurance, and real estate services; supportive commercial uses such as a restaurant; and medical services." u 7 P"' til�tbGr,0 I S s N STAFF REPORT �Y x GPA 87-Oi/" aCITiY,OF RAyCNd CtlCAM4PlGA January°1 1987 Page 5 A side issue is the noncompliance of the existing parcels 4 (size, dimensions) with zoning standards. Currently Al the parcels-are nonconforn�in9"with the existinC d ve�?a�rent district standards for..office/professionaV districts.:: With the, eacception of ,Parcel #60 mo bit NAK2 all the paec(4&s sat�isfyini area requirements for 'distric,4,,,,, Dnl+y Parcel .474 can comp:y with minimum width statnOrds for the Low Distri^t. The City subdivision Ordinanc&contai;is lot coesol'i,datian requirements for those ` parcels under single' ownership that do not meet minimum lot size V. CONCLUSIONS: tfiis amendment provides an opportunity to limit Office commercial activity in this area to the south side of San Bernardino Road,-by changing the existing office designation. This would be in keeping with the General Plan obilective of limiting_, individual, isolated of.- ce developments. In addition it would lessen the increase of future traffic volu�=, at the San Bernardino Road/Carnelian intersecticn and finally, would eliminate prtentiai compatibility problems with the existing- residential development. The residential OternaLi.c+s both offer acceptable land use compatibility and transition configurations to adjacent uses. However., the development,.poential for low may be limited by the size and location of the'si;e. Access to such parcels would need to be directly from San =Bernardino Road because of difficulty in ., providing a local street into the small site. Further it appears a L.4-Medium designation would better fit the General Plan requirements for this vi'te. VI. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The Initial Study has been completed by the staff an rev ewe n t)e Environmental Checklist, Part II of the Initial Study and has found no significant adverse- environeental impacts to occur as a result of the proposed amendment. VII. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Should the Commission upon examinatipA of General an a ement and Development District amendment decidethat changes would promote the land use goal's and purposes of-'the General Plan it would not be detrimental to the adjacent properties or cause significant adverse impacts as listed under Environmental Assessment, the following findings are necessary for approval: A. The amendments do not conflict with the land use policies of the General Plan; and i" r -- r{� P! REP4RT 'Mares J4rttzai�r�28�i ., *?, Page` anaec 1Pteth goasf the,e Iemert�s�, C. ,The aReif,irntsr °iwriwlktt �o be mateitali►y incur=i,ous'. .ow d''etrimeE� ` tiUtHe a 'acent',properti[e vug c sPo c A 'ir to r has.a �• bgen adder�ti� ,%� At ub�ic+Fleari( ,in f, eF aftl or <newrsPa a , P"fie tr'posteddd d rtifc sent!to pro er. 7awr►er : in n 30t1 Ne s 'F a project i e; g, I . RE BAT ' I�t is 'c°ecomiae, dedt thaat �sse d M� Parz;14,91 f2cs x. T and 7� a note i�di EzhtB� R4 bey changedk from offiicev to, iota=Mediums (� -8` •drte 1 n ,$u i�tsi wo nI WA& useG desa';� , iom �hot,�t�d1 the Car�itssi'on �terariiie� that the,requ� red facts fnrr fi7ndi` js Paver g�eerra mat . adoptt of atrW Attu ed Resautiorr;recondrg ,appro�al�c t � n`erelN Pl[ar�`�annilR ,and� i-ssuance,of a Negn� kip �;}"ecifaration ta, the .Gi'ty,, Counc,'! wojalyd be aPPraprfaSte. ` Respectfutly submiltted , , Brad,Buller AdIkL a City Planner x 9B•AW:vc Attachments: Exhfbi,t "A« _ YiciA Map Exhfbft °Bu - General Plan and Ile+�r`Topment District Map P. Resolutfon of Approval' I f w "x 1777' ., t,M y Ys�CNn Mjswr � T� 32 %g< 77 StlB,'t � Sci� u.Y,WRT ' Vlkml1' 1 � I NORTH CITY OF A 1 IC3\,y�. runrz� rr k PL1VNI1G DIN'ISI4N 'AV SCALE- W Y • s e e'f a a • • • n e ul .»..l...l.♦»...f a• .-G.P,�. 87-01A . �1 a •��♦• •�a•�• •fr 0 f i•!!f f•i•.•e•� � f � f J • Foothill / �, t...•se a•.t•r•ar ♦.: aL�t ♦• s eff•.•,•M 9sifr®•bee�• e "{ 1 °•i1►7� •fi►./ke �� iii�diis±s%i 6 � �.yR �''^-y,� '�. L:N f.�i�� eP. ee.e�iD a e.• ff ��C' #�*�'" ►'.•!`O 2, `!A Oft] 'rf••.a•'••. # 1f ♦ •b r ••)R)e/R ..r*t� Qu#�Gt N'�ifr..r e r a a!, " � ,�^ •.iy s'" t� �i�t.. t tlx:' A/^ #>�1{�:.f...... M r#Nf er4••r..•• ##�a #T i#�•� wW � "es•ort;s• r ArrowOWN f Y«•.a,••e a #3+1t #��Mzi N' e� !�'OyD 6r• a e • ��s•f.Wi,1!•f• !ti t. � .#7e6•.1s#� C �''i i'` i •a!s•.s,f FES ��y /yam u+a! f ��.�.�ay�, FgMM K � 1,�LVii CdOU��/AC .�'�'� '. EIJIN EXYrTDIPV\Y G7. '�R:JR/GP/TU� = LAW-MMAN 4-SWW r r-a-1 NEiGFi' COWL C-" PAW lfv 6 NQ,Pma saw—P)= FLOOD CMRMJtr 1 HM *i4 gPUAC M FEC40MAL. r Si:EpA9. D :M& AEDW-H*H"-24L %%c OFFICE', HASH 24-M DUWX - GPA 8701A#� X :1IL_ M ' M m F 7C NORTH CITY OF rrc.�i: 6 A 97-01-A RANCHO CUCAMONGA ° -aw..t 1�mr:L-D!Snc PLANNING DIVIRON EXHIMT: SCALE; RESOLUTION NO. ; PLANRIX COWISSIOR OF THE GETY OF ' RANS�ti C�1C'A1 1{aR� CA�?2F 1RNtA; RECOMNENMING R OVI 1. OF G�R14L; P Nt ►IUI, 87 1*, ,AMBINU ELEt+R kT OF �HQt C t�k11+ GENERl4t:�'PGAN;*ROM''OFF' i ! LOW-- kiED°11 t� (�4- t�titELL' NC"UtiST, f�I RE))FOR 1. r1CRE5,flE IAN� AT THE'NO ttHEl STi GURHERti i�F SAN4 8ERNARD;INO1 ROAD MOWN, � S1"REET - APN;: .ZO6-QO`-G 32, 66, 74 and 77 - `4 WHEREA7n. the*Pianninq,t i;ssfon. has helid a daley advertised pubtic ". hearing to cansirder a].;, comarer(�s. on the- propbsod Genera.] Pi'art Amendment: F o. _ 67 fl1Aa L; M Cl SECTION 1� The Rancho Cucamonga PTtiyning CommiWon hereby makes the: followfoi— ; naTings: A. The Amendment 'doer not conflict with the Land Use Policfe�of the General,, Phan:. 9., The Amendment pramotes goals of the.Land Use Element. u: C. The Rmendmeot woW4 not be materialt in uriaus or detrimental to the adjacent( ��:-~ ties,. SECTION- 2: The General PT•a�� Land. Use Map shall: be amended as follows: Assessors Parcel Numbers 208-09-0%. 32, 60, 74 and 77, approximately 1.1 acres in size shall be changed from office to Low-Medium Residential: (4-8 dwelling units/acre).: SECTION 3: A Negative Declaration is ;.1q*eby receded for adoption by 5e ty—Council for this General Plan.Amendment, based upon the completion, and findings of the Initial Study.. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Plannthg Comission does hereby recawnend approval of General Plan Am(C*)nt No. 87-01A, to the City Council'. APPROVED At3D ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSIONL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. BY: L. David Barke!% Chalman ATTEST: Brad Bullert pu y cre ry "'° °+ a'� y>M�,eU�� �� irk � •h, Rya--.M�r r+� 't'n�f��T1 ;� "t y 1, Brod 6u�i Ar, 06 wmll, �eta� 4 Lh F1an g Canr i��on of t2te Catyk o� a itht forego4n eso�tutCon`a a ��, f�y�`titie"�IC � �rar!.. :614nj d �,an � ass on• the,28th` etayn�a i98a :bgtt►� fo1laringk vote• wft y . AYES; COFI�II�S�ION�ERSti.' NOES comt!�Sll S-Z ABSENT: coral SIQNE6st �I a l Y i IV 'I CITY OF R-WHO CUCAMONG AF u v DATE: January 28, 1987 1977 TO: Chai:mn and HeMbers of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Boller, City Planner ?> BY. dowerd Fields, sistant Planner% SUBJECT: TER ATLVE. TRACT '12870 - AWERSDN - A `resfdentfal su u+sT oar o res. e a custom lots . and .one remainder parcel on 66.4 acres of `sand in the' Very Low Resfdentia °DfstriGu ( RGsY than 2' dwelling',uni'tslacreY.`,,. )) t- located -,re the north side of•-Righland Avenue between' Etiwanda and East Avenubs APM 253-181-11, 1Z, 13, 19;,' 29, Z1,, and 30. in a'dc i�onsw,appl�.cant has requested a M iree Removal Permit to remo%e&,twa (245 east-west Eucalyptus windrows 610,W north-south Eucalyptus winrrov iIF�A'FEpi' Fl`LE: TREE REKYAG-PERMIT 8T-02 1. PROJECT AND SIT,&,bESC11IPTittli. A. Actionlequestedt Approval of Tentative Tract Map, Tree Removal Permit and issuance of Negative Declaration. S. `)roSect Densi,14 1.43 OvAllinq unitslacyp C. Surrounding Wid Use and Zonin Me North - Vary Loy Residential,,1-2 dwelling unitslacre, 5tiwanda Specific Plan 4utt! Vrry Low Residential..I dwejjing-,unitslacre, :-Etiwanda Specific P1'art _rr, East Very Low Residential )„i'�dwellipg unatslac►`a, Eti+�anda Sj? fic,il114gfcs,{r� t- 'West ljgry Lew Resianti-p3 lb,- ltigi9 ue tslacre, !. Xtiwanda cifi g0upiicat. ste�et , ,vi nor sewer by ty ng intc the Victori e F1 annet ITEM J #w ; ` 1 PLAliNTMGnCOMISSIOH STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT i.2#iO January'2& 1987 sage 2 0. General Plans,Designations. Project Site - Very Loge Residential (less than 2 dwelling unitslaare) North Very Low Residential floss than 2 dwelling units z c") South - Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units/acre) Last - Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling Ff units/acre) West very Lora Residential (less, than 2 dwelling unitslazre? E. Site Characteristics The subject s�.te is presently vacant and slopes generally• 'from north to south at approximately 4 percent grade. f ' The site is an unproductive orange grove that is k transversed by 4 continuous Euca'yptus windrows runr-.4 from east to west and 2 windrows running from north to south that is typidal of- the windrow grid pattern that exists �roughout Eriwanda, ' II. ANALYSIS: A. General- The proposed subdivision will have 67 residential custom t lots ranging from 21,216 to 39,000 square feet anti one remainder parcel. The remainder parcel (3.8 acres) will not be developed with this. proposal, however the applicant has master planned this parcel as well as bo ndaries, (See Exhibit to the t The stubbed out streets will allow additional opportunities for future residential development to occur. The subdivision design has curvilinear streets which result in several add lot configurations.. Staff recommnds conditioning lots 28, 50, 51, 58 and 59 for s0e ingress and egress avoiding potential traffic ha -'ros of vehicles backing but of driveways. (See Condition #41. .The applicant stated that the tract will be serviced for sewer by lying into the existing sewer line located in ttie victoria Planned Coni ty . C REPORT ianuar VIM ... Page. B. Design R'eyi'ew Coraoi;ttee: the p QE7t'iPi� , �1 =ihit�r3 reYtew A,' rtopoSgd SNbdiYi5,40h, s the Cbm ttee (jOa�re aBat ter and Pefier To1�stoy)r s=xpre 3erk concern over tide s�ibdivisi°on laydut ani# rrc�latan staiking thek �d'��Ai�st�oi layout has not,,;.ph�icidi�e raor' sensitive *° �trfeplasevatap Tet Comte :tee �ireoted the at icaht Wo i h star$ in exiloring pan al ao Cra i"�€ 91T�xtek desigr3� sons tisve i tree pr?esery ti'd r and`�rg� oh�s "ci�r�r ;a ia,�sues U one y. P ' drthr anal �,sa by6 s, rf and:the apptKi'canit �Che S to could not I,I ` 6e sigrtiican +aeretl o revue rror>o; the'°# ginal ' pro I i os�s of herTtly, trees. _,._ then ,b; a c� (fib to,-P> serYe 'rt a tablUhad: grid pare n o Euca arOff'k-windro , it le 'site" produced, rocs that.Vdoea=sut,��ait�rd�n'ta�t.dap2h�;as rte�l`as,,;la�Yfing l uesusuall;y !Kite.' lot iYr��ages S�ta,$i: �'a'es+�nted this dileia Ito theCfitt dOauantcf end Peter Toy! '��,f during its ;secortai seked�a°ie, re �in�4wich tHt ism.. 3 ` ard" ,prio , orr ciirculati,on .probIftswera discussed zsolvedr nt-i BAsbd on these' ensign cor, i,deratf`ons,: the Cclefttee reconnded approval k of the WtOf sub°d`i''v;sigh;=i.ayotit. C. 'Technical Ree►iAe�Ccwitteec The Committee review-sd' the project proposal and recommods approval subject to. o An in-lies& fee as contribution to the .' future undeegwunding of existing pverhead uti'Tities.Cd the Aorth side of J Highland Avenue and-the,east side of-East Avenue, including ,the remainder pW,,el, be paid pri,r to occupancy or final inspection whithover occurs last. o, The 'existing' overhead utilities on the p:oject side of E Nanda Abe mderground prior to .pUbliz ,daprovemeht acceptance fqr occupancy. - o Provide suftfcient•: right of way dedication' for -future construction of naster plan and.stow drain channel along the o.v tract boundary. P RI6 11GI�4iIS5I �`�, REPORT P > w Page < ., p, camafttee: �� 3 The,Equesttl"ilah T1O`M',1V,'Cbiiifttee reviewed the subject site and> a recct tiled ';approval subject to the foklowing, i,. Wrth,/south traiI between Tots 8 and ,10 ship . termitnaix 'a`t Tot 9 and. provide requivedoaccess t Tot 9: ss E. Easti,�Wst trai«l between 1�6L 51, 56, and. r>' 57� s6 I* ter aI t' ez=at T,ot 58 and provide requ�sr4 access toy Lot 55 hoi*th/loath 4= vrii"'56tween• lots 4% 53, - nd 54 shall'. term, to - at ,lots 55/56 Ms provide ikulY'red, access to lots 55/56. 3. ntki-south trail between loOl 51 and 52 shall,''proceed "across Str4t "A" with trail`' ease s being. provided ''between. lots.25 and:27. 4,' Equestrian Tkails Plan shawing r®ksed trail aTignments, ramps. and gate d�{ai'T ' and fencing details are 6 be -ed to the Equestrian Trails Committ a' for review and approval prior to tract recordation, E. Environwntal Assessment: t The applicant. has completed part one 6' the Initial Study. 'jtaff" condePtea a field investigation and completed part two of the Initial Study identifyi.rg the following adverse environmental impacts: 1. The project site will be impacted by future freeway noise from the proposed Foothill Freeway .and vehicular traffic along Etivcnda Avenue., Exhibit "Ga" shows noise contours and ,'Levels of "harzful exposure that transverse the site. The preliminary: noise study proposes the following mitigation measures: ; o A Pam: nT61 TE1t�146I�EA1t28)t3� ' �l Jar►uary"28x 19R/ Ii\ : Papa r.. a. A.five foot-sv#6d barrier, consiM ng, o ftfthtr a • ;� , . nuts+spi�y �t�i'� .'' eart,��€ (� bare ar x�all.lberar " 4ro*Mnai, `�shaTl be regatred' �a ong' 'Uiwanda `lxenue�. t< A foot eanti�nuaus sou , iarrter.w.i OW any op ngs, 'Orr ;al fives foot as"r�hen bed : �fi� 6e . regt,�� 6d , 611660° the tr,-a r southern boundary +' tot; irgate iadvarse noise tee he Etiwa'' Specflfto,Karr states t�ia, p'a ecis ti:s conOtis to the �'proposcdrs:+iF 4,11 arf retigdg9r �ba 4 E tir di Ur ' erect a name ttenukti'oni- 44C wali t'AriwFcte� r22'. 9f. �, A ffnal acoustical report providing aftiga.0oni measures for" iinterfor noise - ts ,. reduction to 45 CWE` will be required at Des-Ign Review for this subSect tract. 2,. Tree Rewval r.r The applicant filed a Tree Removal Permit and: _arborist report indicating . the removal of 2 mature,east-west Eucalyptus windrows, and I mature north-south Eucalyptus windrow. (See Exhibit #F"j-. The arborist report states than the 2 east-west windrows are in poor condition exhibiting major root rot and canopy► d�, . back, thluningr, decay fungus, and gunk flux, therefore warranting their removal. Replacement planting with Eucalyptus Maculata Is,t?required by the Et1wanda Specific Plan (Articles. 5.41). Further, the report" recommend's preservation, of.witdrows at the Mrth and south tract budndaries. These windrow c are heal/"` and comptete,_serOng as both �\ a boundary marker and as an equestrian. �.. � P� NPlht� t3Q� STk E�EP6RT° TCNir �I11E Ti:Az`��1�2�7�Q '_, Januaryk Page;6 til 1, w t-m* then proposed back yard- Are as." A newjEucavls ptuswwifndrow,'wirl�! be J plated„raJ the 'toe,' ai:i tsures,tok offset the;,fut-ure: repro Of� e�exist ng soutt►eri ;wi7ndrowi ink f. rg#rt,oF=ways $See ex�istigs�EbcaByjpt4s tre+ ranrwiils� b'ei proect"ed*durir gy corstxuiJion y ere(aiJngr 6 €a hi° : chain.= liintd fencd. syrrgyndingi said fi tnees,�e 'tSea?'Cbrs�id iron'#5§} For furtncr deia7�sz,ar>efef ~tow tree arboti"st. report attacfted: b � !s III.. FACTSrE 1No_Msr'," w ,t.c. a ThevftrAbv, ;irap4 to!ethen*;«with:`recoocnded conditions are in Fompttar(cer, w1°tt&&,tte ka a lakaflt- prov�issions fth the E d nr3as 0. Specil'aft' Ceneraj sFl�art , and Cidys si*andards add reguraini ass Th prQiecg wil riot Be., detrriinenta-� to i ' propeM es or, ca�iseri sirgn�ki At adverset;env,�rps��er��a��.ir�acts� �(.e ' to storrn�drain facisEii�iestat thextract' s sths b�oundalsy� whichww al effectively pravi`de'di�sposai s`urfacat rUnoir `fflr>` kmj. co site, ands also fac l'iitate Irrp7 ntatiicna of the-'arta!Ab r`s Mao- stow drain- systea f6m, -E�t,iwanda. Addit�iianally,, noite ai:tenuatmon features,will bey ubiliced;tos miti�at.:adtierse ewter4ior noise,1"evel generated. by the future. Route 30 '('Foothill Freei 44. and additional vehicular, traffic orr Eti ands.Avenue. Mitigati fi,measures will be conditioned, for the reaal'~ and/'or .preservation of mature Eucalyptus vAndrevm.in the E!tiwanda areas ~ IV'. CORRESPONDENCE: Thi��iteaa host been adverb :ed ire the Qai1y Report Newspaper'as a publ ,_hearing and nOtiees were sent t0 all property owmers within 3'0 few of the pra3ect site advertising the puf�' c hearing. To 1 date,,, i(o-correspandsnce has been received regarding this pra3eet. tl , V � e � E FPO:t� V. ali' I r x REC"ENDATrON: Sta-.ff re6snends that the Planning Cora Usion approve T'en;iative Tract 1208 through the 'adoptYan of ttse attached Resalu or; of Approval wit �CondiftFons cnd issuance of a Negative GecT,arati,an. 4 Re uT7y tie or au er„~~" -..... fit 41 Attachments:" 'Fri Arbotis4 Report it Exhibit V Location Map *, Y Exhibit 08" - Site utilization Play > Exhibit "C" - Tract Flap " Exhibit G"" - Grading Plan i F,xhibit np-l" _ ring.5ec#tbRs it "EN - Nofse barriers Mtiwanda and SouiCh; Tract B&OdaExhibit "f" Tree9"Oval PI an Exhibit V ,�. Noise GoutourS Initial Study, Fart 2 Resolution of Approval with,Conditions !1i s �o 77-1 MT Campte l4t6Qtiett(tiiF3l"aNi� _� t, F ;% $�}yEORT1'POP ALLit9•R•)C-. INC. 10070 ,Arrow Route Rancho' Cucamoa,'ga, CA 91130 i OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS sRECARDING r TP2. ES AT Rancho Cucamoaga, CA, . Tract #12870 PREPARED BY SAMUEL L. KNAPP A.S.C.A. KNAPP THE SERVICE Sepeember 15. 1986 i, Riverside(714)688.6043 Licensed Contractor#481325 Fullerten(714)447=8811 P.O./ ox 8796 Riverside,California 82515.8796 'X vats on re$uire- for 4reser, California on O treesCucaSon8a+ c0mmeTV ti to apch�t ` and re 12i0r * - Inavectiou roPosea tract. 4 ' went$ l�ari� Sac•' rust and of k fOr Al marsh seedless) -rage d and windbreak citrus C formal � ns ana ;\ a7lY tech • i jae Pr�nc_P planted for PrO r both trees ��,�'Obulus Cblue 8 droves we=e PlatnQ gisti� �ffecti $a8 ¢ ed 6 tus 8 .�-� .' toa win n a sY been un Euca The EuGeIYP t+ crest""") i ee� have Mural A. onmea � tr of cu Patter Citrus emir s. 'She citr,, tad neglef 'the tree ., tapr vinB Ptus tree erne rePea t �ontrOl� Oisture o 1 d eucal"1 Ot tol insec and m citrus an Isod will n yerUaad elements • ears fertil lack.of ,eel of ail fOr ricer., •Ouch as wac m4eusetes fOr t in mY ogiol°n i mp t be suitable ` P r a balancio t size' (Figure t+ tiei cOndityOn wuu ` ducin8 ruden by re trees would be P nd three (3) :ows c10r PreserYit�� �ucalY4tu w1nad tract t and`id'nt � 5 f os four (4) Sast, dro s within Prof a tree ma4• 'there are EucalYPtus uin de with a,romPanYinB SoPOsed h. SOuth 11 be ma s within P hprc tiontlOcati�n wi l 4tus wind=°w i Ra to0, sIg° fi Vast right EuGa Y waY f°r state a e4uestrian The f1rS, �lst) orGati�p right-ofnelr p°uPled wirh I y ties must be California encre e� $ age chat nseructiou act3 e ?r°PQsed con `e (3) Them th hail. access Cl) �i q f1 J �* co--ordinated for the trees concern and benefit. The general t 't.• wit:drow condition with reapTe_t to health and longevity is worthy of preserving and in my opialon would justify preservation require- menus. (Figure''2 A,B) ti The second (2nd) and third (3rd) East, West Eucalyptus windrows"- that are within 'exiotiag declining citrus groves Cz:1 in poor condition. ; Mayor root ,and canopy diebacklthinning* decay fungus (conks) and gum flux, resulting from trees that were dependsht S ri Icu;Ltural Me tJ practices of the citrus grope and neglect there of hdlp caused "•. 1i p r A e 0�t u the decline of windrows two (2) and three (.'!) within %itr:us groves, (Figure 3 A,B &,4 A,B) The existing wi1`diows'nat wixh�`,;Citrus graves are, in good overall condiCion, `smyAt '} and more compact in overall size creating a more manageablr' tree. They have been unselec- ::, tively removed andare not continuous`1n the windrow effect. (F ,gure S A,B) 1';14i. °iduaa) trees or groups r/%f trees could be preserved, but in my opinion complete_removal of Fwindrow three (31 and only the Eastern portion of windrow two (i) would be recommended for pre- i servation as indicated on tree, map. The fourth (4th) East, West Eucalyptus windrow overall condition is good and only limited areas would require replacement of dead or damagedtrees. In my opinion the health and 'continuous windrow effect would support preservation requirements. This windrow is the most complete and serves both as a boundry marker and as a (2) L- equestrian trail with .a proposed back yard areas. The first (tat) North, South Eucalpptits windrow general condition is poor due to Meaning, form., upper—canopy d.esdwood and t-Unning from 4. prevailing winds. Thf:^s windrow developed height to help compete for su`i)light, but Ioat struetura�tenaiaa wood for adequate support ,• £unct:6nit. (Figure 7 ,B')-'; Tn my ion removal would he j�xudaent V in, respect to changing„ eaviyarsenta. j The second (and) Nh)rth, South° Eucalyptus windrow general overall condition is good.a F u sar an • Southern portions are faiarg nal l x1a condition, with the c�ntar section. in exceptionally healthy condition attributable ro supplemental moisture from,adjacent-,property 1 owners. (Figure S A,S)'< In my opinion I would recommend preserving In efforts to maintain a continuous windrow border around the tract. Supplemental planting, removal and. repla ement vould be necessary to continue windrow effect. The t�ird Ord) North, South Eucalyptus windrow is marginal with respect to windrow effect, heaph, structural and branch attachment safety. This is a sparse, partial windrow with regrowth from topping, coupled with sucker and se,,d regrowth at random. Supplemental plant- ing, removal and replacemett would be necessary to continue windrow effect.: In my opinion replacement with a healthy, more manageable tree, would bR judicious. Aft (3) -71 caxcLrrsrQxs:. .. �w. The EuGa:lypCusa trees, avre existing in, a soil. (roots) and canopy (leaves) enfironwegs . •the,y have, established over the past, for a (40) plus years of giro,* hu 4'eval~opxont_ant limb �,trt o-Mre. 'SIX pyre cautions must 6e excercIsix4i to,,ea�sre foaii g=oduct}un fog cantiatia 8r+ ! process.. Disruption`,d f the PAT,8,i cal r.stia of ro.ot and. canotpy re- 0. lat oashigs will, relapo to. increased *oat anda'Z a531ity_, win4 "atirs ' r must be maintained within a natural or forest like: format.. � . Retain loaf litter beneath c�6�.�g's Do nat indiseriminatal.y remove + g,+?.3imhs J cr to .trees 4a a predatermined' height. Provide trees with summer watering. 1, a ' Prune to Arboricultura3 standards. fj The Eucalyptus trees must be maintained properly, if not, R• the collective results of f&erse .en-vironmental and cultural coon Ations . will lead to demise and liability risW''associated with air'urbanized forest. (4) .IWO e v. . PREP kFAMMON, RE-OUT EMENTS FOR MATURE FREES , 1. Corrective pr.un3ng ;co speclkad standards for trm* preservation is urban dievelopsrieat. (Cirtlf ed Ar°bortit pref'arre.d '. ` 2. Establishaeut°off undd{siturbed soil zon4 around tree 6aases, sat at a. 12:1 ratim I of soil surface atdth to potant ih trunk diameter. i 3. Clearing of, vegwv ition"and -irutalla+tion of wood,chip mulch on a needed basin retention of all;.:,naturatl= leaf' litter beneath canopies. 4. '`where soil ha� been compacted ' bt+Oft 44gturbed a the ��r: � root zone area t�rticularl7 u`n'der ca<aopies)0,-ferti,ization, aeration. watering via soil irjeation of all a ss+ IeSt �T' in the root, mom.a. 5. Installation of irrigation systeme with capacity for periodic Y deep watering, daring and after development. ` 6. Installation of chain link fencing to protect trees during development of the area. 7.. Examination and docuatentatjnnm of each tree, with apecific'. , maintenance/preservation recommendations. S. Transmittal of recommendations and specifications for can— tinuing tree: maintenance to parties responsible for tree and landscape management on completion of area dev_alayaent. 73 �. , m Of tl -. . R14TE�� xNEI2d�T YN.Cs � �`8� T� R� � RE: All treats. that ara to b,*proserved - t, CONCERNS! A. Agia� ur6�� .�a;xa�st B. Gro'"4 ,off .euburbar C. Oivi�tgmkq t'aY LaCt01 y! •a Strategics:. A Auuuax i"pection by qualified tree apeci4liaLg B. Avoid oitoto, naaageaeinit G $ItAb 'Uhm*mt of 09,62matic nanageaeut plan, D. Apply a irtBoxrlcultura,l priac£pala B. Documentation r � k 1 f (6) IV tF,c{ �.�' C .�I-'�--� •".'f.�1 T'T�`'.: aa'e°k VI Sri N a l" rrr � �� �,,.:1ZS « !+! l �} � i ail •ft- i t + `t Adalk v \ . ♦ .a..,.... ...F�-t,,.'n Pam` It t G,0 N WF�PLAN 1 1L_' Fa AM- N'.C: • OP 7 1 t NORTH 40 4" IOe' ci TITLE •SLY �-f'1.,AN FWT i S' K: VL t . ,`" ` ,.- �!® '•irk � ��� W! � C I G-ra�^ �.. Y{tl4.7A' vasapv( x I yl.. a � t ♦ � 4 .` wa FROPOSCD 3TA TQ N70NwAY JG / . °L' .rtr a .wrwras �+W wupe IC t VA{A t- s NO VTH uaMOiirG� ti��•y.�..r�,�/ ' j 7 •, q 1 Aw F 4m • �+ �. � ...l.s��. N IA nrrwlm ewi`r _ - 'Y:1 ilirn' Y7^' '• --C""i��mM+s id �;�,�� NORTH CITY Of '" �• F'I11Vi�[IiIS�iSIC��i �« i33:T�c�;I11 S C:., SCALD i °�.Y3.�.1 "��^ �"o ...`�"` / �`�"� f i \.�� ! y�pr raarr .von �iss9•s �.. !' am m rm as r+a wM ., n. Syr �. '� .rs .�(�' —'""•"'-'v�'.. t' - It �hp u I^� / lNOICrH I GIIITT Or. ANC .:.,°'��. ' ' ,1 (yy.Dl�►'�5IS3CV E1HII�IT=. SGl1. = ems. ®2 � -� �-. �. -� � ��? 'r!`�� �, . �: �°'� {'. � r ,.,.-�'l �_T._.?-^� t..�-ter,,; �i �.e�tl w .� �' �r `�.�-�` ,1� - a• hl a..ice'•'„ .1 '� 77 rye. t ' s Hams "s rca,� Wrest✓n MCstae•sanv�wA ar�a[s' it d1 S- � � �TPD�M7W.W4TIQM�110/TM Tl6CT 9�9YIIOAIIPo�' - tllllt TMd1M 9RM�!TL'IRf\�IOA'BSII� �i� * �... i1 I cr y or- Zk70 - t• RANCHO CUCA IOti`-`PLANNING DIV t4 24'2 i /a' to 'Airmr w TIO/y BARRie c. - L.LVCdGKR Ct7MNR � MRRArY T7rAfC, •EX/ET/.Vf ROYF.KiHT 6f//LL'Ar,.PAD LX/sr�aa eGrt ixxiee�asrr x E�7Rt/OArD cast- ; YG xrAra/N iH rt�co -Rvi/G F41CZ'' 00 t f lil A!N W= l� tr3T/NB.dWASows F 3 APB AlEh1N7'RAV,\ (TR.60t/NDARY •. J.ILLil g0' ISC'LE IYAY JS/s✓ at:J, ` 0mc-ar PSI'CIASti4 rREEWAY.rYJRIAC,6 !F 7W AII.AN lAl/LRYR/AN". CIONGRLTf LNlO 1' ACCX ANC tuwlNa K' \ CNRNNLL. A[LLdJ LAttJiiNT T19'Mp7ARY PeA4WK LYTGY. SECTION A-A NORTH �v .' A1111%I NC PLANNING DINT SIGN EtiHii3l"E' '�•. SCALZ.- —LL i f 1*0 jr �D i r Ipay. � Al4YtIfO Jl82NVI �� L `. �Y�T �'1 Qsam.,r�am�e�s ;Qxanss.9isrr nwr:,sva N:"rrkaenr.ms,Mlvss. N011TH ' CITE' OF, TITLE. 'i ;sr — Gf! 1. PLANNING DIVISION � —e .mow Figure 1. tboation of Prejected CNEL Contour Lines Before Mitigatioa NmTH CITY Ol. PZA rare of extTactjor a: INC RAH® " .OUNGA TITLE: Pi A;t`��. ING DtZtt'(3 i b'svw' r� 'fs:ar.jLxHImT. r P SCALE: '" ;, CITY OF MNC8O CMMONa PART IT INITIAL STUDY EMRONM$tTTAL C&ECt SST HATS: , APPLICYT• t FILING DATE. , o-, 5• 'e'<a_ LOG NMIBER: fy A PROJECTi d ?" :S .+�/i.S c,✓�d ' PROJECT LOCATION: P,-- E 2. MD IA01'P3EN2`AL 21TACTS t (Explauation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are r sheets),. equired on attached YES MAYBE NO I.` Soils and Geolo¢v. WiIZ the Proposal have Significant results -in-, a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? h. Di3tuptions, displac--ments, compaction or burial of the soil? c Change in toposraphy or ground surface contour intexva; d. The destruPtinn, t rerizig or modification of any unique geologic .or physical features? e, AnY potential increase in wind or water erosion Of spil.s, affecting aithar on or off site conditons? /" f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? S. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or'similar hazards? h. An increase in the rate of extract-,:on and(or use of any mineral resource? �f 2. WrnlogY. `Will the proposal have signiiict}nt results in: YES MAYRE0 u CliaQ es g irk currents, or the course of direction Of flowing;streams, rivers, or'ephemeral stream F channels'? b: Changes In absorption rates, drainage patters, dr the,rate and amount of surface vater runoff? Y c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of sun`.ate~water in any body, of Water? e. Dischgg¢ into surface waters..or any alteration of surface water 4uxality? f. Alteration df 8'rouadwaterrchifictzeristics? 8. Change in the quanti l of grou��,dwaters, eit,"-er through di'zdj additi�c us'o's"with- aquifer?<or throng: terferencC with an aquifer? osa Qu% ty? scant Irfantity? v. h,. Thi reduction in the amount of%iat'at otr- he wise available for Public wate'r'�suppliee? ' i, Exposure of peo ple o P P r er prop_ to ._ tq -sr r related harsrds such as floodin o rs 8 arches? _V z 3. Air Quality- Will the proposal have significant •resulta,,U., a. C-Instant or periodic air emissions from mckAje l or Indirect; sources? -- Stationary sources? 1. b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and/or interfersuce with the attainment of applicable air qual,try standaras? �1. ns� c. Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affe or temperaturecting air AavemenC, moisture .?,;. 4. Biota Flora, U'll tbe`PrOPosal have significant results t - a:' Change in the'znasatte"risild ofespgcies, ;' s Including diversity, distribut.,,o$, or number - �V ' of any species of P3a;nts2 4u4ail. Cr a ,tv of b. Reductioa 6f,-tae nusbsrsyoj'a'ny unique, rare or eadangered rpecies of plants? g M e. ez Y \~ YES MAYBE :4o - 'C. ln�xoduttion of nev or disruptive species of . plants into an area? d Reduction_in the potential .f- _ +-" -icuttural produciton? Fauna. Will the prcposal'have significant;results a.. Change in the charactertatics of Species, Including diversity, distribution, or numbers / c of atny species of animals? b. Reduction of the numbers of any, unique, rare e or r:ndangerad species of -animals? c. Introduction of,,now or disruptive species of � e animals into an area, or result is a barrier ..� to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or wildlife habita€? S. poonlation. Will the proposal have significant zesults To. ` a. :4 the proposal alter the lgcation, dis,tri ;Cann, density, diversity, or growth rate of the human gopulatioa of an area? gill the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? F fi. 5agio-EcoAoait -actors. Will the proposal have signs zzztnt results iu: a. Change in local or regional socio-economic characteristics, including economic or - cQ=ercial divers ty, Cate rate, and property values? b. Will project costs be'kuitubly+ distributed awns project benefVIaries, i.e., buyers. !� tax payers or project users? 7. Land Use and Pianninc Considerations. ATill the propasal have significant results in? a. A substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? •b.. A conflict with gay designations, objective;-, Policis.. or adopted plans of any governmental ill 4e pafi. Xn,impact upon the qulaity or quantity o ? existing consloptive of non-consumptive racteational opportunities? YES kfitY$E 230 AML 8. Traasnortatioa will the proposal have significant rasults r#ai•, a. "neratfan of substantial additional vehicular y� movemant? Effects.on-1xist=cg streets, or demand for new street construction? c. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? d. Substantial impact upon existing transporta- do systems? e. Alterations to present patterns of circula-tion or movement of P=ople and/or goods? f- Alterations to or effects on present and - potential water-borne, rail, mass transit or air traffic?' �J .k S Increases in traffic hazacAs to motor vehicles, m bicyclists or pedestrians?' 9. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaecic^ical, paleontological, and/or historical resourceb;.? .._.� ..;...__ tom..._°. IQ. Health. Safety and Nuisance Factors. 'gill the proposal a ai ha, � gaificant results ir'- ` A. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? y/ b. Exposure of Peoplazto potential healthhazards? C. Al-.* of GxPlosion or release of hazard oua substances in the event of an accident? i d. An. increase is thr, number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? f v e. Increase in existing noise levels? f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous noise levels? j g. The creation of objectionable odors? k-- -Ad increase.:In.li h -or glarelteastf,t 77777 YES MAYBE NQ 11. Aesthetics. Will .the proposal haveai `� gnificant� results. in: _ . a.- The obstruction or degradation of any scenic vista or view? J ati— b. The crEaton bf an aes^h_e_tisally:ofFenaive —� 1 Site? �� s ' n i c. A coviiLt with the ob eetive Of designated �� IIIII or �!tent;al scenic ccrridors? /_ ` I and proposal 12 I ik lit` a3t Public Services. rohll the sgnificit Aaxd Eor av systems, or, II �. +ihferat�Sons to the followings b, _1Vature] �,r packaged gas? .G�omatr;nicaiions Systems? Oter supply? e;° ::+uttetir��w+er facil3.a��1 Flaod control � ructuras2 g. SolId waste fac,4ities7 VA h. Fir+e_�xprotection? i, i. POSaca protection? ,v,/' J. Schools?' k. PaTIM or other recrearional facilities? 1• tta:[ntenance of public facilities, including ro;tds and flood control facilities? f m. Other governmental services? 13. Ena and Scarca Resources: Will the propos.L�- have significant_results ine a. Use of substantial or�excessive fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upor- ea 'tstirg / Sources of energy? Y c- An inereaswin, the demand for development of new sources of energ7? d. An increase ar perpetuation of the consumption' Of Son-renewable folms of energy, when feasible :Aaneweble sources of energy are available? xv , Y :�� +.� ��•�,,ry Y'Vc. ��aa.;N , �� {E e 54�seatt&i}a�I"rtepletion at any nonrenewable or '~ }��. s�atr�e✓n�` . xesoa�rceR 3.4. 'Hanaata.rgr t�nd3 �s of i�gn7s��ct BnCe, ~ J 3. Wee Ta Doe;f� hep a a l ateta C al to 3egra$e. 1„ tie � yta"�s Rual MA enVir4stm��5t **.,su M aaus:e a K as ar*rad1 " P�Pula'tion to tzap be3ow s � at:'i ng 3eue2 an;ta e2LC134��'r$ L 9T 8 �} fi � RLtm#s G�iIItl1LR1 y @ qce ��griaaetrcr '16e i`aag�aof a`rare c r r endaages� gta�at a an tmaa o`r '. oImp s t fcraraf ebe: j�sr x3�sds of J� CarI � Y a>a PrttSstonf �t bt Does:Vt A ojett haves the:-°p4t rit3�al to xc&2eve �— share*t xrs D tt}r' e>„vf rn to ( cL$iddVanC$ge 9f lcxig«termv xgrtrceria4 $ f CA,.slaort C"t ,impt on the envdronsastnt i�ti? ,s�hich cc''�rs:3xr a a t eSve1Y brlaf� der tzvr rang— teava yaCCSeF^iI1 endua a xe'T. ink} the Eutctre) ,� �` Does the ett bare IZP*I:ts 0404 OX0, iad��ridus�.�y Iim3.ted; but.cumu$a�t�vely eon*iderabl*S {�u velar ve p oadt$�36:&b" meant that tFe £ncs�seataz'e�fq� ,off.aa ca individual'g d�ect':are con§£deratS9 when.viewed is cennectintk crkth'the of ;rtr, s wt%past>projects, and'probabip, future proleazs3 d. hoes the project have envxostmencal effects >,t 'rhich will cause svabstaatW adverse ®Effects -.bis human'Neiagsg either directl3r or iadirc"tly? II DUCU$STnu nr vimven2D .1�TA2 ZiiAYVATiaN`' _ _._.. .._ ehe a!i jve qcaae Plus `zlisce;asian ` ��e•, f aff#rmst3ve"answers to uesti C . IV ?it#gasion measurPs). I r; € An .. rbsa tax of r y ialt al &valuation- } w ..find tY��p ogosed p oj�c GouiD N6, have"a sign fi aut elect r am the easwirouffiGat,.8nd a NEGhTZ�E DEGLMUTI'Oyy"M wilt be prmpare$.. T fiat.that mitlio�a� the prapcead prajrert;could have � $fet�C on t sa eviItn � SQ ficanC gn n thisr;.ce ce -A-ft tg�ttEoalffiessure d scribed oa afecE cJ a���ehediz s ee f" b { cd add to the,grof�n A NEG.�TItT DECL.�I2AT$Q1V ( '2 NL P rAREHP. j`J I El `' ed o f e vi B °� s z> 1=Cat kil4K hxye a �t94,01cant effagm, " the Etr'S!Y.RA' PORT"is' required.. � t S�'$II1LtiPe.' r.+e. .E t aKrS .. r T*act 'rill' r a� _ I i AU — , ® '1f ��as , i AtTA6kNT `TO INITIai. gUDY PART, II �` 170TATINE 7ttAGfAim ` 'A Lb,c. .. Theti-pr . ir1, sult in th disrpt1 and displacement of-, A h � teOiicgg r a a1a7�g thQr south ptoparxK' Sing-' thqre stdhm h In imprdv cent f are req-ii,iredp. This+ draipage facility it ' proposed =F - --appraximaE�f '25"�,ttgw the pad.elevafi�4ns along the soq F property; t,ire, The Conceptual 0114 i1g-plan indi�tes the re0000 of orange g%owes nattive .cgetation, .anal,Eucaltus tomes � .es'seni'ngg �abttionr� tesYe cor�srddi.on o p 4 f paved sprfaces and single family hares wil'1 increase the Gaunt oi~'surface runof#� A sur aco tar�'ofg wit try i13a cEed`, o the. t ets r i and,. cdnireya ttt^u appropriate dranage, faclit9e '#o the storm draf! channel 001 g the smith.property Iift. 4.A.c. Flora The peioje ' wtl1 remove existing ,vrang4 groves from Yq, agricultural, production, however this, wife not have a a�flsiso ficanir adverse impact since a Gandition of Approval sahVing pressrrivatiah Of Citrus trees-4111 be placed, on.the + Tei�tativo tract�4ap. In addition, the project'a�i,.introtloce sew`shrubs, groundcdver, and trees to the site as part of the Pina1 'Landscaping P:an, Fauna 4.a,b,d. - 'the project ,sill adversely effect Yexisting wildlife habitat by arousing construction and human settlement. The loss of r matura,•¢rees, shrobs, and brwrshes thru grading activities will ca0e.migration of wildlife out of the area. Also, the loss oe: mature trees will reduce the nesting' habitat for Raptors:' \ The project will oxpose people to harmful, noise levels generated .,;by the=` Future Route 30 Corrids'r Traffic and veoculav traffic along Etiwanda avenue. :,As mitigation, preliminary and Final Acoustical Studies are required that identifies appropriate noise reduc4ic,?, measures to reduce � unacceptable exterior noise levels,,-,to (65 DSk) and interiot.,f; (45 t16A) noise levels. The project will also increase the ' level of light and glare within the surrounding area, however such increase's are no greaten than similar uses and not deemed to cause a significant adverse impact. F 12. Tha pra3Oc Will necessitate Eh`� const cti•Qn o z f a sewer =tot ihto"that are8 rtid� server sir tee.. e tp; n� I`ine is aiocated'-0in t `�ictowia specific P,,ian . IR adtliv� on; �Che proe` ' Wel`i4 u cap its tined` to c6n.struct sto►a drai(p fac7ititi�es as--gait—of —Ovar-a a A a Drainag- ( _ 5-#t itr3Ytffa. }. . n •i'' in#±rg rsas read arc cth.- w, N 4t ;i zu L , J • I , 4 RESOLUTION NO. RANCHO RESOLUTION OF^ THE LANNIHG COMMISSION' OF THE C,—, OF AMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12870. WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12870, hereinafter "Map" subotted by Tony Mize,. applicant, for the purpose'-'of subdividing the .real pra;kot;?.ty situated in the-441y of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, S ia, of California-u desepibed as a residential subdivision of 67 residential! 6stom lots an_d; one remainder parcel on 66.9 acres of land in the VP;y Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling unitslacre) located on;::-cne north side of,,Hightan4�4venue between Etiwanda and East Avenues -;APN: 255-181-11,' 22, 13u�. '9; 20, 2�1, ;and 330 and Tree et Remo(001 rmi t 87-02 to remove two°(2) east-west- Eucalyptus w•,i.ndrows and iD north-south Eucalyptus Windrow, into 68 fore lots, regularly came be 'the �4ning Comaiss_on for public hearing and action=on January 28, 1987; and I staiWHQR,EAS,. the,-City Planner has recoamnended approval of the Map and la Tree iteosova izpzrlbit su gect to aa1 conditions set forth in the Engineering Gad �l Plannipg1D #*jgt s.repotr�s,-and „ WHEREAS, the Planning, Commission has read and consider,? the Engineng nw� Pa''~` reports and has considered other-evidence pres.eAtFect*tar#fi� public Baring. _ ,� NOW, THEREFORE, the Punning commission of theCity of Rancho Cucamonga does. resolve as •follows: t- . k SECTION 1 The Planning Con fission rakes the following findings in rogard to Te—HUMe Tract No. 12870 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific pl'ags; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent.-with,-the General Plan, Development Code, - - P .^r, and specific plans; ,4q) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (,d)= The design,of the.subdiv; sion is not likely to cause r substantial, environmental damage and avoidable .�• -.JnJury tc humans and wildlife or their habitat; �,A Cei The.tentative 'tract is not-likely to cause serious public health problems; R. r noSse ,reeuct1 to aw,CAEL at be K .,?qd red 4wx est 6 4 ai,9.s PLANNING COM4rSSION: RESOLIlCION ti0 "w TENTATIVE TRACT 12870 January, 28, 1987 Page 2 { (f) The design of the tentative tract: will not conflict "` with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the proortyJJwithin th*;,,proposed subdivisifon. (9) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is i ssued. SECTION 2: Tentative_-- .,,ct Map No. 12870, 16py,`af which is attached erreW,and Tree Reaoval' Permits 8T-02 are-hereby approved subject to all of the following•conditions and the attached: Standard Conditionr. PLANNING DIVISION: 1. Applicant shall submit final landscaping and irrigation plans showing details for neighborhood entry statement, street trees, community trails entry details, parkway landscaping (Etiwanda Ave9VJnAAPesi9a Review, prior to map recordation.. ri:e smtal? 2. Tree replacement plan'shall,be'sunmmAted to the. G't t5lag &for review and approval, in accordance with-the-Et Wanda.Sped{ remmments, showing Eucalyptus windrows consisting of EucaY.ygsr Malculatta (15 gallon) 8 feet on center, planted where windrdA ara..�scheduled for removal, prior to. issuance of a grading permit. 3. Equestrian Trails Plan and details shall be submitted to the Equestrian Trails Committee for review and approval, prior to final map recordation.. 4. Lot 28 shall access on north side of Street "B",_lot 50 shall access :on south side of Street "B", lot 58 shall'access on north side of Street "C", lot 9 shall access on south side of Street "A"., x. 5. Exi3ting Eucalyptus windrowsto remain on project site,psha11 be protected during grading and public improvemaemits activities b,,"�recif g a sir-foot high chain link fence. Fence shall not be removs0.,wi,thout written permission from the City Planner or public improvemeritS«apceptance by the City, 6. In accordance with the acoustical, stut:, a cormbinatian 5 foot earthern berm/ landscaping shall be required along project side of Etiwanda Avenue and a 7 foot high decorative masonry wall shall be required at the top of slope along the south tract:koundary. Details shall be submitted to the Design Review Committee for 'review and approval, prior to final,-map recordation. 7. An acoustical stagy, shall. be re4pft�ed' providingµ mitigation measures for interior noise reduction to 45 CNEL at Design Review for subject tract. 8. Nortbt/south .tra'l betty n Tat 4,ano,,10 sliaijw� er `iat�c`i t lot 9 and b provitle required access o, lots§. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 12870 January 28, 1987 Page 3 9. East/west, trail between lots $1, 56, and 57shalt terminate at lot 58 and provide. required access to tot 58.. North/south"trail between lots 51, ., 53, anir 54 shall terminate at lots 55/56 and provide required access to lots 55/56. 10. North/south trail between lots 51 and 52 shall proceed µ rrlth trail easement befit across Street "A"Tg�provideclrbetween;lots 26 and 2.7. w., 11. Fquestrian Trails Plan showiipq revisfd trail 41ignmait,>, ramps and gate details, and fencing d izls are tt.ebl submiitOL� to the Equestrian Trails Caaaaittee for review and£appr"oval' prior th'trkt recordaltion. ENGINEERING OIVISIOW* I, EXI5TIN6'OVERHEAD UIld irE� a Etiwainda Aveaiue 1-'TWgi stlhq overhead"utilities (telecomasmnications ` d electrical) onY `prdiect' site 'of`Etiwanda` Avenue shall 'be dergrounded from the first pole south of HighUnd Avenue to the first pOe north of the pr'.rject,'s north boundary,, prior to public improvement accedli�ce` pr uocuo'ancy, whitheveir occurs first. Reimbursement of *bne-half the adopted"`cost of undergrounding from future development as it occurs an the opposites,side of-�the street is feasible, because file property is presdhtly undevel'aped. a, b. Highland Avenue An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utili.tfes '(telecommunication and electrical) on the north side of Highland Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to occupancy or final inspections„ whichever occurs last. The fee. shall be one=half the adopted unit amount times the length from the center of Etiwanda. Avenue to the east tract'boundary. c. Remainder Parc l - An in-lieu fee as contribdtilo'n to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunication and electrical) on the north side of Highland Avenue and the east side of East Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to occupancy or final inspection,, }whichever occurs last. The fee shall be one-half the adopted unit times the length of the south and east boundaries plus one-half the total width of East Avenue. 2. Victoria Basin she be excavated and-permits obtainedas required by the Flood,Control La striotg City En°YneeP 3. In t e event that„�hd"���A1WWOLIii not p_o cted frri& drailiage from the north by her development r r su sh }f be�`p`1=Mdd& tmr''protect the Tract from"svA drainage s .:ro 1* 1neer. 4. Dedication shall be made of sufficient right-of-way for the future 1dAstructij)n of Haste: Plan Storm Drain Line No. 2-1 along the Tract's south boundary as approved by Caltrans and the City Emginear. j PLANNING'COMM, SS10W RESOLUTION NO. ! TENTATIVE TRACT 1,2870 January 28, 1987 Page 4 AIII S. The right-of-way for the future Freeway along the Tract's south boundary I shall be reserved, as required by Caltrans and the City Engineer. 6. Rock_ curb per City Standard No. 307 shall be provided along Etiwanda Avenue, 7. Intersection drains shall be provided at the intersections of"C" and "D" Streets with W Street or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer.: 8. The portions of Master Plan Stors Drain Fine Nos. 2-1 and 2-2 shall be constructed from Victoria Basin to the Tract. )WR developer shall be eligible for reimburI of the cost of construction in accordance with City Ordinance No. 75. 9. The developer shall bear all costs incurred (including,j,,condemnation proceedings) in the acquisition of tFe off-site right-of-wily;requirel for t Storm Drain Line Nos. 2-1 and 2-2, if it is not acquired by some others paeans prior to recordation of the final map:. An agreement to this effect between the developer.and the City shall be executed prior to recordation of the final map. 10. Standard drainage acreage fees shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map if Storm Drain Line Nos., 2-1 and 2-2 are constructed by others. 11. The temporary drainage swale within the right-of-way,for the future Master Plan Channel along the south tract boundary shall be designed and, constructed as approved by the City Engineer. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1987. PLANNIW COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY:E. David Bat-ker, Chairman ATTEST: Grad Buller, Nputy Wretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Co mission of the City of. Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that tha foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of January, 1987, by the followingvote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: F NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: � au�u�o er a;i �co+a ^a Q.ai'ry Nri o. v -e r., �0. 4�«a " a• :�u`Nq ca if mY« ..♦or La-o •Y L 4 c� °L'.rwi d O.`• pN.0 Y L!n 3 y O p Y O 'd Q a Qw9a IIGCw rt� TC�6G y9ey y.�w qt F�� 00 E.�♦a> 1 FK yy.�O_�Ll q�.C'••�:1`e�t1 RD:nnN� �Y Y4�QL, 3L u0 O'er' C L:Y L,eG.O 4�j C ��ppd dQ,^w• N OY 4NV LqI V..N G Y OV � 0 i�i4oYn` Nt90 yilt",Cl ID = gY0.�6�0, 'a A16 ! Z CI RC'6 +s• rJ^Y -5'• v N C '.I � YyL� @ U €e'•'..uc CG .,� no�7ro ,vBi� qi{..o,oYppa =4e'.s'Gp C4�/�'Y YQ W O'Y O�GY u�'�� O F� AlpLpq e w 4! Q •L. = 'O��laK ,CAL«u GS '4'.o M2a � 4;".�`s$i� ma,�$:� `!Y'rd��'�Y'.. ev' .c'�Y-'" r.o'.a♦ aQ^'"�`o �,�J LOy'6L4q aIL A'.Y 'qqC.p 3s4 V;'i�M� a�KpQnN S ' U. 1 a« FO Ia ,CK ALL Yw to r�, u�i aN o autl''�viy(,�... w p G Yro fill-El:tl V rd•'�. ... T' � ♦f E0 �F�AL OtI YQpK AML k `R � Y V } C�Hl l�l4GCt I rl .gyp oo v mva Q++ W aU9o&uc-v .. �.y0� W AL.. qN aY oyOY. y60: 6 3GW pw.?, Y Q ' N � y O Nt fi � �' 'Y Q �C N h.Y.4'•� Qa y�Vi w .uo o KK w Y A ,y • �y.�al G LL r� _ = N \ ^F 9$ yy �i•Oj G y S u= �T 404.�a'9 C • � � � -. N�'' .2yG�.y,-0 gip C'O~ �O � O['�O; AM6 \(�, Vt i COt',y•d:.�i-�' + O't.OLe Y z j 15 i�3 G' ��Y'f �.R 1•dNA NLti► 4{ yc�O gg r e r e l� a.eYa. eva,w Ys�w.a. `q pv �o v lY�o Loi 1 {. M6. pC'.ti' C>PO MOY •LL.�C O� A S a. f N O NrE H: w L.+ k Yo ��. t3 ate. Np e� 4VLQ n w O C N Y y0 C�� d �. r .1aa ,ce . Ne ccF•... �L ow{{��ByJ�F S'�i Pin�tt E�a to. ,Le :-', `_ N�L� O O LyY.CFSLLL w�ai^..S d U n i Mr L� S O � °1ois. rr�^nn OS O���r•y'G 6N b Sa wN.e: � qn�=. $Y� '' LN"L OEY.i Y4.. Pww tlpyu YTCV P.O^ �L w. y. ^�NS L :� �56 CM O.+ YL✓.. Y b.Y 00.s.G 4UL +LPna� N b�r�N w : L} �M by �YZi aga p 1�. 0 P►.�� d` p`' wN 6t UU' 21 Z,- Nam. Np. yQL�,��6 �. Fay�1N M:b v� ♦ Si$ O..- Uv,C Cv Y cw,C ✓Q:F,"g1 N.�w-n'��` `g� NNv �q nNY Y U 9iy M w^ �uZ p1 gi�'"=aS p�jyw�YQ e o.C+:=�i LQ$ o ,�eO$: �ic � L4r ' yi.^ ti1r� OY ���ppp Y.Y Y>Ctl o � NL ��•C�N CyY C p NY cY US YY ER��� t! AA v p�F L g�'� g o ya �3 dr y YY+. �3�a�fr q �$w.a g }� V« o2cNQ Cr-5O W-=S OG Log.M�A `'..'". 1 N eq Y C Ly' S 8,.... a O Y'w r a+YL� +1.�,. SwN�ro� $ecY "CC ui �q+qmu w aq:.. r bZ. ffi"'c AC N. ,;S2 e�YO Y ^C A'y N� wWEOY ^sF dT'S �-Z"o d^Y w3.r iP cq pCp' � cPya M ndN N« C E�.'�n _w M, _ 46. SE��Na P> Y wyO !-$yam !I C�eN b" 81 Sd �-m Ze ,PY�a��s,Yy C"_SU ¢;Wads V N g .Fi u o cc d3 3Ew ''d UW ttJJ � A N p C L S S p w V L a Y L '^'iyC1i JO. L« ��C U�y Y. nCLYb C�q� E.Y��C r CO 6 ii Y C y dn'a`gyo ' .NEB b'asy ^. .pq3" 5r'c a'G gS vg,SS=.'Y N«S S.- A, . �S'C. YVp N O. CObSw O} E �� po]1y LbC pEu■ PO �UNp eeQ {Vpy`� t' }� ab'O oY�C CBY a+ C=Y Il p�p tn.6r 6Y N[1M1 I�LnC HIR �.�.w a�nc n� b J ; E s _ 'W.t, � a011�L6 ^Q d 64 PY O C6O wi �YaOi G-C C� + C ��Y11i ' QY 2k '^L Oi L� Y4YV L a0" . 4\ �! PQ S. L Pbi. NC6 �`Wb ti Lea V1V. N' � P a rl ;r�m {l4� a ra m^2;A+ d OLD E L'}O!. rt• 4��� .,�. J rs• r acNNCs. LPV�dL�. Mix: 60L. ay0 am. Yq�~`.CR3�' .c No�N .c.-rt, CG"M yC. O. Na rb$C rn$¢ NX Ni't � .. aCN„,gYRRm�g N:rm r�«?vCCG-o YY■,L L;dg p G` c rAi k.. maO ..�� V6M T'O 'scS L.G av��. ✓A,. Ly�p..6'u b ZZ �. sCY mYpYp,��m.YLYVO<� GTwG,, w.CCL a..YprO N G4L~\,� {'.. S .Y. C: ZIt L V N ' NVLV' L Om. QLj '^N vv. �O) PYrt 4N m0 A AozY�,CmrrY u'a > �Yn 'you �Nw �N 6`:6. tY�6' .O.PrtNNi'f�OC�YpOY.,,Y� 11^`9.:�gsMC pO.: C��60NY ie �nrtmCrtC'C MR, t01 tlY0 �O L aL^a O'� _ Q OCY prtCO` <M KN� -:KM 2N0 aY WL. K'N LU �IOi�iFN NNNNNO. K9'aL fC GY YL.Ow GM \ tea.OBO �c ~� ^o � L��i $C�i •\G�'. �N g...$.wGm,$ No4L t.,.s . � '.G yy.� c°� u s v ''aw�. •NLa +� Q N� Lrt Uw. \O 6 yam'.- � _ 'a•• � ae ��=a �. 52 Ay G. ��a'J GY yN. rtQ P � stye ^'«.. ":RLa9a. n�' r^ gip. iva�. a„N. \ �..�• NG.+.1 F—ZI ' Q YY. E 4 tl �� gN99. a ` II�M N. OM L.: A� L Q O t�'^.]'i L'i!N�N V CKw. rtgE... w uM S 5.. €� 9-IN dYV.0 'at w: Y a o. $ NYY cy �i vm a p,p d0 rt ��\ as Yrav • rA 4 rtQ y ice. yL F.+KO i]LOm G it PE^a, GnY$=NN - � y C�yO.VjVL E2 �O Z'w. �,L' OLOrt Y406�yH y, -97 a a N T�iw V �t04 29 oNd�: �.v++P c."i+ L'a'9 o c� vwY6pfi.. 6�N O KiLC v.q ? C7 n I�O.N 6ti Ka �eN�rt RO C. KNOn WO.S�V}yy �} 1 r z Y^t L .� O�YV t ' h� ' >+i aa.c� Lx {O.� C<�ly..� qV�9 yV ![ Gp i,•` J.Y O T A Lw Y Q M C. , a g a[ -Z a 'Z Nj 'Y3 9alY.L DEG., µ .; � �.y N1�6 �. 9 a G CCN' 'rO n,pY u ��j gg 4 QK.O� V.; QIA .U= �8 w. .i J.CVVS cu u Mi CY6«w .Y tl�' , -a-. �gga � G M,w bM► 'tlOSQ NE2 ..JO '` ..DNS fw e � YyY r m _ 412p it :Ez � s y � gg HSNY.� Y nSCY, NiiS� W°'$. S"epp sMN0. �N S^C�C, S YY M y tlCF tx!Y� 9jv�y. M V* Ea_L. Yw@@. Y Nzi � y%tlNO. YC� :. � Y `N' 4� =� p ^ g - g`M g ,5� 3« g N ps A w S� u -Iv= + c$ v Ss � N+ a tl tl '�T+ q�. w>$..Sg N$ nod o.N ilu Si al 5:e 9 a c {Y� t� Q tl =YO u,- 7 Yt (U-OwYY `':4 r w.V pa l CML ni, 52 � u. O.`GGv'''..L16. C R. 3 CAS` �� O YaCC CC Y .�EE C� n L„N,'L C- LC �..Ya Y Y CN ^ y�a O16 ww « .22 G i�.C na tlO^ YiC1M..LG IO. .gprt8 �. M'b pN nl ca NYC wS `gym - r L»tltln $N...d�. GEE Cc�g io xtl tltlN� w L,. u as SY Y 4 S uPS v.-o S, �• w. uvc 244na6�� �'•^+N ?Pii .C' .p.} o.■^.. i n c a ;! 'O UW `w�'S.`Wu`Y:nN O^ '�•_ j p 3 L .�JL. r. 1�9�7� .Gn� CYM� W4.. WE7 :6 O�+Y •...� F it `v nt �— �$..;�$ a d sags 4 4J. �L[� `1 y�e"{� ceV4�n� iA gad R S 8 S > `sae_ g j aif a« YYg a� • R f 90 (�� a IMF.�f�..}�j���' ��. Y o k 9 Iral� 4Y�4�0.��4 y y4Y�.�M R�a� � � Y� 'yi ;rI y�+•y1,��E rJc. fla In Adak _ +_ ON O� pwe. Y w �1C.w. Ott »^ V,e. CL4 a Cal 12 ^-.e. �g ►mu'. $5� � a�. 8.��. g. ��o.. manyy ee��$ a � C�1 taa SS ae Y ' .. .8 a�■Gx�!Q�� pO Cy~ f �+ of aL.e4 '!a • Y. �0. �'6C CAC 0' Cv»�wt ag rd� ^fir s Ili- �ca o® c u opw y Oj.M `e 2 gCOL�M LaC +� 4p6 G eC ~ t► Yq = V �iY --�.M. S�1•yw o �npn- ..eray �% aine �' j r. .,� K ap ST� p�. �.�L � � � Mw� got N �dQ �. • ��,'" �.®. g EZ kYa �r c $��� iY YMi �� i�~A� � N� wi YJ $- y fie^ aus "WZc�" g ; vn� JE s `, fig, RUX kj L, sL »A R.uy�L.. ' rt y-n y•* $g bra '*w-Z ME l,�^ zvy�. 8S Fr. i iyr`i`y y@p py I vqy � $4 ,p t� y� �"�7• Ovw Yak y�: ) i N rt it aEv wa `o., 1y y t yy L V � A x 1.6 yymr - • �r V $~ , �� �r-r�4 L�� i�� �.- it It t: VS• �W � CJ r t1 a�9�Zr.5fl S`a f1. �. Soutr iu Y'ti': - 4 _ cM019 L aERM!* , Jim E. unn � 5 n Own $e a uW • .?060 03T: R O w. L gVtl L � y.l. sis OCCCp O O L Q.V�ObT}. - p a jSy51 � y'.g` �Q �, �® �0mg'$ •'sy �� ��. 4 wAu a. �ocb GO `y{A� �L a>-pC fSNys EMS V' �rL LAUA ~ ra iu01i.'.0 4Jt�2f iCgLL hqa S�O. 13Fr � - an r v r -area 5 STAF REPORT DATE:f is nu&;y 28, l987 :a 7' T0i Chafifran`and.Mdaibar.J- of fit E i iarrninq �06nissfon) r FRO : Bna(f Buill*r;, City; Rlann01 f r B" Gregg tage.,,. Assistant Kanner SUMECT: ENII+IRDt"£�4l ASSE5MeE IC A iD,YAItI' 10E,86K 8 `'SFEi1tAGER. o' wa me the maxarr e a ,-requ�'rp, n .V 5 fee for fixedr ra�3fo ante a to) a�tlrow.%a►z ex�ii6rog, r antem 40�„feet ft be5!gat td be exten&6 to) 70 f^.'—tt;an e 47,aore;°,parcel fn; the Very Lowr Resifdenti'aij tr.,Ofs Tct'i'eas. ' than 2 "d�te'hi i[ng unftts 'per' acre) hocated-apt 5327 ira�oT ; Avenue An iogf'=-iYi-ig. I. ARSrAKT: As "a `result of code enforccment, the ;appl4cant2 s " sr�approval of & V.ari:ance to„all!oii-the contfnied uxe 'of az , f':zed`'radio z tenna� tourer, Althougte a builii!ng pert i.s i;gquihe t fj.r the antei4iat footings, a.,peg srti't was not obtaAned pri'ar to `onstructi on,. The applicant his atw requested approval to exte6a- qW the existihq radio antenna, from 5D. feet to 7,0 feet in. height. Staff is reEbiAei ndfng that the`-variance request he.denie.l on the. basis that the required. Facts for Finding necessary for approval ., cannot be met. " II. AWALYSIS• A, General:, The Development,=_bode 'establishes, the maximum pe'imr d height wi.thi,n the-.�erY:Low Residential District as 35 r feet. The inti lation of one antenna which .exceeds the f maximum, height of the base distri,ct, is permitted;p?-ovided "the,'i antenna. shall not'exceed 50 feet fn;height, ful;':w,extended`when,i',� in use.,and no higher th4n 35 feet when not n,iasz {unextsndedJ(4,! as rr;iasilr,0 from grou�sd level". The existing`antenna is, approximate,,a 50 feef.in height, and is xt' retractable to lesser height. and- is thc;-efore in;.violati;r-;f in'.fts presents , condition.- The' applicant also jrupases to increase. they discrepancy, by an aldft-icoal '..,0 feet by extendi-nn Ahe aff*n and support structure to. do ' �srall ,he�ght�'&f" �C 'feet.Y irk justification for the proposal ZhR applicpq}t has stlated: (1) That strict enforcement of thei,,heTgh& rpqutrement wau d 'cause hardWip < with;,�,rasu t' to •Yantenna reliability; ntr Env soan�InM!�a 4 ITEt+4"K , PLAHNINC,_CQF891�S"10K, S- F' R,`,FORT Ya;sauce 86-0Z - 6petnagel January-ZSy 1987 i Page Z. y`- (2) Th3 ` rateur,�ado is a necessary and important _ emerg:: cy sv�xice;, and That, amateur- radio serves to a protect this--public �` health, safety,.�nd welfare in times of emergency, In order to consider approval of a Yar}ante, a hardship Faust be r ..: sh;,m apply to this property which does not. apply generally to other, properties in the sanie zone. In considering. the request, no hardy%ip has bets fd"ent1*J1ed•_whicch is gplicable to. the ,su6ject s props>ty which s. not generally, appl�)cabi to other ppoper'ti,es i r theiYery Lome Residential District. Also, the hardship was self- imposed in that the antenna. 'strrture was erected 4;thout the \ City's revfew or approval in excess of the 35 foot height l,fimit when not in use, ; In a, MemorAndum Opinion and' Order adopted.Septemher. 1.6, 1965, the Fede al C66mnications C, iss'an: WC) disc Wised the preemption of stab asd. local regisla tons pertaining�,�,\to,, amata-r radio' k z #acIlities.. ;n� #ts dis6s0on,, tie FCC recogilzed the iamportaace ofl,the amateur ,radio s;rvice for the provision of emergency conhunications We, will cat,, however, specify any, particular height i,;eitatiou. below which a. local governsent may not I qulat�Y,, !,or will we suggest th:-,-precis that muss ue contained in,local ordfnar, 4s, such'as mechanisms for special exceptions, variances, ar conditional use permits.. Nevertheless, local regulations which involve placement, screening:; or height of antennas based un hLJlth, safety, or, 'aesthetic cone#eF rations ,must- tie crafted � to accadate reasonably amateur co*wnications, andr to represent the minimum practicable.r`,`1ation to i accomplish the local autho rity's legitimafL„__,dose. The City Attorney has reviewed the FCC ruling and determi'ned that it does not preempt the C ty's antenna regulations (see. attached), In acccrdance with the FCC ordee, thd.?,development Code doesn't preclude amateur co nications neither db:n it discriminate between amateur radio, television or satellite anttarnas. The Code provides for reasonable amateur communica-Voft, while . styli representing, a minftn of regulation in accomplishing tlr. aesthetic goals and objectives of the City. Therafore, in the absence of a . hardship applicable to the property, and in ftCat of the existing pperatianai status of tile* radio facilities, an extension. of the tower and associated support-structure is not warranted.. Fvrther, lit that the safety and stNztural integrity of such facilities are legitimate concerns of the City's- regulatory process, the soundness. 141 ?35W 3 and ade4uOpv. ofn tag, *e ,istfng a tenna -.:foo;i Qs shau dr be �nvoszruga,�e�>, ." E�nviruntr nt� se_ssmot Staff has tdW sated Part 1,1,�of, e tnr ronw�n�a� �0ec � — and�f6und nu s>ignif�icant i"acf�s�� fh� � ensttronaft as> rsstlxtxo4t ,; Z�.-' e C'oin approves+�t?se .eSptetELarikanoe; .they issuance of aegativ '. �pec�arat�f�snt'�s rPdoeni�edt, . � .� TsI. ALTERNATI �fi:� fst an 1i.tern 410,:s.0ution to approa,ng the requeskted� artrance redesf�r. ,�th'b e,�l; ing akt.Ugna= CM�f�i��lli41t,io l';S�4UI�if be oonsi� eoi &t providing a:. Aff edt-lsunp4rti stcetctuhe$ wst an, f extendab , en�tenrra's .qe�, ait k7y effective coma3in3�catil6ns soul ,die aCfli'e sd, while .-=04 hupr �1g` wf .5 the appl'ica6lie portions. of IY FACT 5 'FOR FIMAZNos� the OAve to nt `Code requires that .,the' aF�n ng .�o ssa an taake 4ertata`Ft ndings befog41,variance can, he granted Bas d` on= the foTTowing facto; staffr-bel ifeves,Ahat there a gsaff e 44stf-fi"cov,ow to n�,tite. tha necessary findtngs"nf ;. x. The ex ystiing antenna, 6 ht`'of 50 feet does .not' canf; rM, to the 35"foot, hefght l\�i't when^ not in use. Further, the appt3oary=, request ,.�' extend' the height to,, 70 feet would increase iitis discrepancy. 2. The nonconfor�ity, was pelf-impCsed and, not due to the extraordnar.y conditions applicable to the property. sueh .S, as to?ogrf by. i 3 That the granting of the Variance would constitute a, € special privilege inconsistent with the liai}tatf.00s } placed.upon other prgperMes in the same district. i 4. That; approval of the Variance does ,not resolve the potential safety hazard created as `a result of ,an unfmspecte&footing. Before granting a k!�riance, the Planning Condssion shall make the following findings-. !. That strict or literal interpretati",7p and;enfarcersent of the .specified' regulation would iesult in practical difficulty or inane&#ssary, physical. hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. n / �. zr r' r RPaEt1 � Page 4 L halt errP. 3i��eFexceptlFit)c8� oj` extraor.diiilary'`F. eawnstt cas or orndl�tionsap� ii'e� to t ,proper + irwoi�v:d or to -the e intended a 'of' *.hey property` iiat "do no��t' apply geilty torat Or prop�Pties`3n tFQ 110ain� i,striGt. *; 3. a stetkv Titara7€ nte�ire tita �4n�d enfc cement the spe i'arwo#itd�rzt9 he�a �itent of 1 privi"Eeges,16 oyedfi by;the diners'ofother{ipro�ner fe in tt salae i dust" r G a ;� 4. gnat ttie Vranticg df-the Var�i 00e w cli not constitute a. ^ �r gf'ant f sp cifa`la pr�wilege sinconsilstegi: wft" ^' the t lintitati'bns an :oth ergrape.ties ct�ass�ii'ed�in the same; di strict. 5. That the grareti; of ttie Varianem wi T "t be detrimental to the, public diuhv� safely, or �dffkre,. ?or. materi ally. nduriuus�ts properties,or i proVemgnts do 'ee vicittity. ' V. CORRESPONOEFtGE } "fhps'-+te*h4ts been'adxer U04 as a 6bj-1g fleari�ng', tOU" n e si"I " _Report"nei4sRaper,,. the Pvoperty.`°posted; and notices here sen ° tam property °o�ms within' 300 feet, of the subject property. �! VI. �RECOMENDAi'IO Staff recommends that the Plannsing Commission deny to ar a'"i"nce l i eque'st and` direct thr 1ppli.cant to pursue an. aiternati've,so,gtian. / R tfu" ubmitted, ` rad B City Planner t ` BB:BG:ns ; Attachments:. Letters from App\i\cant Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site`;7Plan Exhibit; "C"' - toweandum Opinion and Order of She Federal .Coununi'cations Commission, dated September 16, 1985 Exhibit "Do - City Attorney Opinion Resolution of 'Denial r r r a `"«.w .C'- "`'.,� 34ggf!+��-.-ec' - ,'r'; r,,•'^ P... + I am a radio amateur Icencei�'by tha Federal Comlivacati;ons Commission a to anerate,In,the ae'-I" �a3 high frctuency bands frem.I&0 to i'Q;Viers. cf TAW`ai�eteur radio s�erriee fast;"'fzom. t;°s mceptionr3n the,es ly .1CgQb's,}} <: been involved in publ:t se v#oe; �ethn oaL-exPeriuentaCioa and fntPs- national gaat�-cad a T 04c-�ils�a these,, an.rffect�ve a3�d aff�rc��i%z antenna-sgatetmr ease tial Run u�ental sateuca d fgn equiie for an antenII 'rad3!&�!.'F" #,s'- .-mac '^ -�.' -,. F�.. �t.r ;3 one-fourth ors men `rat ceath ,� n.,,�uar fie P'l0sed a I g-b a erg grout , tTie psesant tom, the,!,owe t ., freq �ncy bead Lkst ''o�elr,�ta : s ttee` 4 metes=hand. ftirzh elgigrkat f tequenaj'is d9,4 Feet. C3:�5-�i:�t mil>. Oue- f, max antenna glt7sf ft ,evo g- ns lgartaaceto_.;.Me broecxaimcas eeQ�rf>theJ' cal, location-oft ot nO PP e half mile to+the north. �a etiiave eiaaaErle„ consistent and.°re3ta�le cormmaicatiansc ante at,must h0:ves a face un�barructed,,and lbg °ang33e of radii#ou AID of these cs sera a& met br'mainta nrng wteana�ieight at one-fourth wevaI�engE3iE abay 'g aunt. , TO aumMd,Vixe,, an mnCemm,gt.M orma m004=efficie;mlr wleen It is placed a minimum of, ant-fount n ware eiiRCEt above..Ronnd . An effjejeut antenna sy4stebt` i essiant3al to prow der reSosYatast sad re3.:table. carmunfc ti once, e3pecfally ti the norC4. dne fb4%rhe �diiA is caT,`*rriesr°,,of the mountafas. • Therefore, I-`kL `to beet a cas nncm granted to section ! .Ud3..U6p c£ }j < Ranchev Cuevm;3nga MuniciVA Co&jj and be allowed to erect an`anteaaa . support,,structure 7C fedt in ha#ght�This antenna support structure will he constrccted using gaud engineer- ing practices.yaad principals lied �rfli'pose no"health, safety or welfare consideration.1� . �' Cl4arles F. Spetuagel ' 5127 Carol Ave.. Alta Lama, 4alif. 170E George J. Rohrer,' Attorney at t-1w D.. Craig Fox, Deputy. City. Att6xney x� Greg Gage Decemberr 23, 1986 Ar6istant -PUuner Planning 1livxsivn City of-Banc:ho Gucarionga l '; i f B iMr. Gage,. The following inf+prmatipn is provided as an addendum too my variance appl-,cation-dated bvemb:er 1.3, 198b'. The Federal Gomniuni`cdtions ,Commission recognizes amateur radio s necessity and ..mportance to emergency communications in that it is specifically stated as a Jundamental purpose of the service. Recognition and enhancement of the value of ,�, the amateur:service to the public as a vol- ,{ unzary noncommerc ;�lrcommunication service, particularly with .rispe.ct to providing emergency communications (1) Vorld governments recognize the abtlirty of the amateur service to - ' provide disascer communications on o,�,aorld--wide bAziils.' 'ghat international ,r4lsaster communications' Zidd be 'facilitate3 by temporary use of certain frequency bands allocated to the amateur service. That upder those circums,taiices'. the stations of the amateur service because of their widespread distribution and their dei,',3nstrated capacity in;;such cases, can assist in meetin& essential communication needs. (2 Local and reglonal -amateur radio clubs are continually inv'blved in providing, p4blic service and emergency communications as fr evidenced by the rec—Tit Cerritos air disaster, the Mexico City earthquake, the Rants Across America and the Grape Festival. Since --ne of my areas of concern- is to maintain h station available to respond in times of emergency,-,a hardship will be -`4_,reated without effective- antennas. The mountains to the nort`i'� create a radio barricade. 'A consistant, reliable and efficient.,antenna system is essential, t -{`L ,�y Public service, public safety and emergency radio is excluuPu " a from height restrictions._ (3) ; The''purpose and intent of the Developmen;..Code is (in part) to, Fu promote and protect the public health, safety and welfare. (4) The Fe,dera,l. Communications Commissiop believed T, at, be4ause of,, 1 restrictive regulations pertaining to amatear, radio facilities, a limited preemption policy was warranted. Local regulations vhich involve placement, screea3ng, or hsight of antennaa bazmd on health, safety, ''or aesthetic.�cansideratiaats must be craft-.A to acr-otme-- date r)ehsonatDly amateur communications, and:''- o re- present the minimum practicable reaulatiort_to accomplish the local authoritT'sj legitmate'purpose. Therefore: This varianca should be granteed, as it fiaa been: shown that amateur radio is a service that h:a,, demonstrated it's aeceessit and importance in it times of emergency. This variance :should be granted in that deing ' so is in agreement with the purptise a41d intent of the Developmeq,t Cede as amateur radio is continually enZagoa in public- serv?:ce and, in times of emergency, is regularly engaged in commnuicmtions for the purpose o. protecting '. theL public nealtn, safety Land welfare. This variance should: be granted in that strict ,- enforeem6nt vault cause hardship with re.:Ipect to antenna reliability. The full test of the cit,,O documents are enclosed for your con- G rience. If you require additional information r1ease ccnt.aert n_'_"' Sincer_3Yi Charles F. Spetnagel 5327 Carol Ave. Rancho Cucamcuga, CAL 91701 enclosures (1) CFR Title Chanter 1 Part 97.1 (2) CFR Title 47 Chapter 1 Part 97 Appendix 6 Resoldtion 640 . (3) Development Code, City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.08.060 _1(1) 'I (4)'Development Code, City "cf Rancho Cucamf.nga Section 17.02,010 C iemoranduac Opinion and Ceder - PR S-3 cc: George J.,. Rohrer,-Attorney at Law Ralph D. hanson, Deputy City Attorney 1 k SITE 42 .' iy+ ' sa sr / (sJ sa Q st 10, 44 60 v p All 0. 94 rOS7 gag s1r!` .... rae�c' taat t�a39 tars tas! 22 f: -9 re z"� a aG to iil g 3 8tes: 20 8 21 IAOgk 1061 Ftw 11 F.1!t"Yi.?W — ;on Sarnortlxw G�nfy I I I I NORTH 1 CTY O RANCHO WCATMaNGA Tom=LOMMM.MAE PLr1N'aSlING DiA'L k i Z_XHII3�t'= ,,, SCALD '-Fr � ARDL (�: PSAT PiiUO,for P olPosed Ama .,,' "=Radio �,, _ Aacaema Towr , OWM*. SPG=290l,Chalss Smdra 41�,�Ij 3. 3327 Carol Aec. A1t4 tolea, CA 91701 vwn: 71 �9$S-N303 s I1 E:c`rSTn9'fr _ �b'dSG F. PAorbs£U ArAm C RAOM E.itt�Ti.J G Ex73sra6 33 NORTH ' CITY OF ' rr�.et: v�►�tw� ��-�� RANCHO CUC.ANION Tn A AH PLANNING F�t�'OOM E HitltT.. SG�t.C= t 'Before ire Fadersl CommtanickiiD �C'o�amiV,don Y a�shin tl,rl.M LMIM4 � n ��® Mdt#eriif L Federal preitlon of.,state ant ) PRB-1 local regulations per,talning d to Acatsur`radilo fa:..iI•ttl,es. I All c .� i AN(� 6f1i9�o 4• Adoptt►ds SsPtemlaer 3 �1985 ; ��Ro leased:Sept embar 19,,398- It By the Comm(sdik :'Commiaaior"r itivara scot par"-�Lcip+Qtin&. 1. On July 1¢,, 198d• the A0*r1,kan Radio Relay league, Inq-+ (d1�+,➢ filed a`,5equei for I ssua to of a 04c larattory Ruling asking ueA��? del lnsate the liml�a#Ions of fining and other, novel and-state regu.,�,�)ry author Ity over Feder°alxai, ►►'Mlly- nSOd`;radio *acilitirs. Speciflcaliy, "o'ARRL wanted an axle i le it statem nh+ that you Id preempt,ti i 1 local ordinances which provably preclude or signiticenrrly inhibit etfea#tve, reliable ofttour rod common icaflons. The ARRL ackno\< *49as that local author It l0s, can regulate r an;at*ur !no#aI tit tons��7k-`lnsure the safety and health of persons to the coalunit'y, but•'b0leves that thoso regUlattons cannot be so,restrictive that`"they•preclude effective amatf.' r cameIc,3tiors. 2. Interested parties were advlsad that they oould file coma�ants In the matter I. Kits:axtanskn, com4aents were due on or before Decediber 26, 19a4 to "ith replycoements due on or before January 2s 198.E 3. t, Over sixteen hundrad ri,mlaonts Vor'a flied. I Pub is Notice, August 30, 1984, Mimeo. No. 6999, 49 F.R. 36113, Siptemoer 14. 1984. Z 'uK I Ic Notice.,,December 19, 1984, Mao No. 149S. 1. 3 Order, November $, 1984, Mimeo. Not. 770. �S `�. `W� ! ° 3 Or f l-lctz"bey s tw;sma m it opsrm 9rs,pegard tng radio and ennas:aad r local a>;hsrttias reganctngTr�a`s�tC ve ord�nancda erg camnon:. Thmtatcyr operator is sQownrr a ���Y e a `� o a�[t ed i� Per# 97 of our Those raids:do no `+tin �h e a Uri.3htenna but thby ibswise, $ bAr ar�kiatloat;"sate �aas e ' ia,ttnar� 4,Grova,�; a proceduraa insist beEa4 • ° �r�e°Ydr¢.24Q fast 1,n L+e�ti,t a8ovae ground i►v�ei or, ru► an to a eta et $eQ new+ at�pos fihu '�.f under UGC ru�r some tsar a suppart struck`red"t' u�ia�'oostsvcor �. marking and t°ightai�ag}: � a ` has issca�A ncun�r� atttfms,,or �g srn(r � i bodies; frequsnttyPezw�sg rttl?j antennas and t?�S sup c structur�as to heAl,ritans3 iota ton�t,aeg:� u�sde o t"asr yards, for heoifh, safo r ty, o ae "dt M�+con ` attests, �� hmal F+afi in�gg re to tcns can re�ui � ` in coafi9e„t b .caws�?�the��i�feG �ass�,. �m ccraRu�toa�lons ttiat*'�anete � s from an amateur. radrTlti arsdire dmpenaeni ugatE�+s 'locate orE and tho height of the an enn ,Q Artroateu 'opa- atops m6oita!in ,hat ttley precluded frog opeiatitng: cer,tifrand��a,tto ` ed ' their use if fihr[� height of theIr arttannas,. IsT tll sd by�a�l�l a-i"a ii�inancm. l� �. ,xampIas of,rssttive' ocel o�cf�rness +lets subsnTttFd by revmtai amateur operatprs it, ahisE 'c o d ng� S�"faAn ay ,1 Gic*, San"Diego,r ` California, noted that in, Slit 9)i`mgeranlat �r rada antennas ccuna asndor a ! structures rating NhEcftr f"Iftt b�u.JidtingitNetghts tc 34 iest� Thusr antennae there are aiso> ilntit,,d to 3Q" eat. hi:q�t"an�dir yrftnio , undeloirh, ttitnoSs wrote that asp ordinance of the i fi�aga if $undtia'tn Provides that an antenna `� must be a distance 'frcmn the property ,F,p th'tt is equal: fo ones anci;an ha,l'f times its height. In h g case,:heats if MItsd to an a4'enna 'tower for his, amateur station just over 53 fast Tit hlRIght. - 5. John C. Chapmenw an int Woomtngtci, Minnesota, commente,,t that he was es.t able to (26#11111 a bu.lding permit to tnstaill an amateur radio antenna exceeding 35 fe6t to height because the 6doom'ington cttg ordinance restricted "structurAsss he.lgh.Wto 35 feet, Me. Chapman said. that the ordinance, when xrMtert undoubtedly applied to buildings but was no* being,apptted,to antennas in the absence of a specific ordinance c regu.at?hg them.. There *,are two options:;open to him if he wanted to engage ° in amatajr communicattois,. He could request a variance to the ordinance by way of a hearing before the City Cfjuncll, or he could obtain affidavits fro-a his neighbors wearing that they cad no o.LiJectior, to the Urdoosed antenna Installation. He Jot the building. permit after obtaining t�%e cnoperation CY his neighbors, His concern, howevo:, is that se h&li to cat pernission frc several people before he could effectively engage in radio communications for which he had a valid FCC amateur 1"lcense. V a 4 A { \� i.a ,.i6. k".J_.'SiN..��•�.up-'.Lx. t... 1, , � ..}.ew ai n..q y 3 �'a�• ;�r a'�:..;cT�' � r�.la�, �� ` •r * a � +o het' restrlatt.ons, other, i �tt aces e Ci ri to eta (dC@i l' ! antt'�Cl Cn+�J"divbcers on tCitioerSarm Q�4 :-o theeel�t s ces� +�9h '�t�?iPy�gs Pirr tinesn;Ai�� u� sf� '` oE�lTcarpn c , t,{n *t�, salydr i.010, ito3�s ` r�Sa rnl gf„,c t s�.s. aau�id�es�ai an anac�s�afm+�rs�k��ati, y a� a��a�� ���e►�ii .ro n - tns5s" e a Me u 1 soe+o3°n1rb'�"�1� �il pdrri � r e 1- tie tnfa `l .:�l� ' aid - ase rdvn�3Con .. �E whF;c re lt � t �1asfo, ,puTefas +s�t s'os. Tsrcr�c Ya atRorsfr � s srM oeau+4 rs t t?rr�e r, o�x ,,,� �yy ° yf, �ha a f1 `s t �d� �'�t:ra0 n4 �fcrtli tral t sr e � nt�, �s sottec 'o"sr�e� grn( ICU 7. lGt 3i�r Wag e+tom apt %appcs�;fioste�i�a�5vns cn +tsb�r sur ' operti�ons� r { s ca' s��st fq to di4edss fq 1a�f he thatr apartman+ le�asrs. S"r�ttes} h,Rsgiws+r`foie caen�sns,ar�sconl�tUa! • � aelteetmen�, b �eastir , they' 04 net $en(wrarl�t�r a p�,tf Of concren.trb tosNniot, ifia;cavl f strnaaurs;�at}o ,° eoaaa�n}e�,'i��k t ors�raearirllrng proer�Qs�,.�s�rft��'s�r,�"i'�<of ra;t�',E'e#dl.vsr aaversanto,_tttr4a etdsd. for {nfoos�atto7t. ,`r ' Fugate Q; �+s of Holllitsr, , a i arsn ,{�ud�ad l hl�s ooa�arts` ekt"ct of th01 Dscterattorti of v rr h stridtTons f6i"I dgN+nOlt, County .ait Benito. , +a f Cyr.Ec►ri,ts, �`3 prov tto antann toC.ltxv1#6.Cssteu� ar ,�tscspt4ort`�sf sad"ice, t, d 4nafs s 1l 4e eir 't qq+doors for use byr any l htng It axq,", upon ap'provbt df the'Efirectol's. ao raii;To tmttav�l=s oar k r aha 4thli`- form ' ofetao+rnagns�"to�d(a ,°shai6 bfil p►►rmilited to origin afro wn Eat 'VW14 ;v may unraaix ab;y = t:tterlere v!°tt1 the. t, race It'' erisicn oro eadto stgnai:'x upoh'any Other lots Marshall Mt son. Jr. ptov{dad a`oopy of the restrictive Covenant .Mimed k in deeds- br^ t;tt `� `11 Martln Rd'dttion 12. irving, TeKas. It Is bindt'n.,, unan all of the oiners or purchasers of the lots in the said addit/on. h:'s or their heirs. o ecutors. administra+ors or, assigns. it reads* No antenna %�r tower shalt ue erectnl upon ataY tot 'for t'.4 purposes of radio operatlotf's Ktitt�m a, Hamilton restaas in an aoart.ment ou.lding in Gladstone, Missour9, He cites a ^cause In iKis Lease "iechTbitin5 the erection of an a*tenna. He ^� YJ IF •�� - � art. . r •, x "' ata;�ws tt4s.� ha► h���� �t�asl��xo !'y �r rV� � 3�'ti t Yl �3`sd F� .17�rir 0% tiop ':0"ad 0 y�tulpMF �� ;►�, t s"h#fida,� �lc4 } ratlsr trattx *, tts tn# altrJ .,, trf hea $ham J d we) t,ar � T '� �� �?r�op#!,�frt,scope rhbn ^�'aa��uo•vP�t,�Jd a�cve.`+�- �• nn t»y 64v* 104 Vp;h.a"sa ;4t iib"lqv Jtaugta T f \ �asttictt^oa ah ettn ��ctandtJtiaOCI I 6btis 'I the roof f17a«cr .: g a. Amataur � � rarl f, �, sr�v i(dyra! rraons Fh ' +BAR rrsSrraic«tfrv. co aisttGs for itn atfa,�esueh rase# �i on '# e�� tt"J ; they oan"ra tha . a �- � 0laa tAtO thf�t fh4 , ° r' a bry �Y 'c C tw D r ! u � ," C tsatTvet t?i$ # C1ttt" tt i` e{ tl�. : Macs gh via*, r�r at"+ rhafi ;'mvoayano J�as #a�lQtj# tza caJt thti a�,c'*a'Ve ! i :a► f i+�rw tt Y ' fhv t,lva�. ?� 'Mm contrary 4,1*04 hand b� haysafirtc� subtlf�r.sGortY^�asa��4��1 hfc% itd y' xcnC4tnTat+ru,n cr home-q +fir+ Sa:rRa Ir s is tha",' tat ha ro ,J#�at!and 0hich tuta ataty hat a�r� ,_�a�us`r ln�c� ieto{sc�r,�n"nth drat: � xhJch eay ba apar ad fine h h Cto3s t fens.; r+adta., s� irao o�:araw eyesores ftylr"da,frA fry thr at tar°tc ads § rirfT1l P+c' boa biF; h`cr r housing drv�tia'apmant cr apa�r3ar�r� txsgf�ak "Y � riisrs tk ° +,04Y�F r ca4'soquarrccs,R the +'uiatYa���orts end�=so�tu#toifs � taas or Dy—taxrs��vSfr.P4tTant,and. U'rAftatfons oa°`t Is pa T' ti^aspd h ag$ tim4 ofho Sa31� rT dx pth� tct i 3P# r akthsr� ' resttJa of antongas err J ca�sas., Ore, ft� [tc '± act g +i +r$ sn oral Tr�ta at 04 sr�roCsortY, F'Ar�sars or, Us'soox ark iron to chdaxa Vhe�rhor- tha�Aluv�i td,raxT »h�srt. She ra trt�e� fo an' Our antennas, art in of#+stra'Or, :-S*t't`(* illr�scttY i« steesur-tines C"Ys ��. i Tht?-Oepsrfa'�,it of Oefonse t]wa su tpcx'tad the ARRL' and anphacatasrd .n ' § zcsanongs twat r�ntfinua; auecass 4JLC7o1l€ �X nataasrftyem1117 s and #j7S ftFYtVtatYfj 6n{ #nr 5 � Dt15'wouId-ba sevarely d-tmT4tsh*d If Sfa w' and ioe,^ei ' ardt.nahcies prOhlbit tha c�nstru%:tj,oq and urage of d. f ttv ,at�t c+ transr Tss.dw3 i „ fAGti-TiSa� . �3aQ�ti T2aii valuntaiers 'h "bd '-All t tary A?'�!f3ta'R3dfr4 fHAAS34. t;FvTi Air Patrol TCA°3 and the Fss4ta Am'4teur Cl .c'rtcarganc*r•,�*��ice tEtACE53. Tr patnts out that those vdtunsaoce' Ctic1 UA'jCat4OrS &a o(yQsfa�".sty"'radio e;uTSuent Ts�sxa•lTad to trtatir hares enq ihax uhdua re�trlcrtonx on k s i3 �o6sT u.;var �z a4s*Tcas�af the .',Ttitary xnic-i racrults. Notunteat' aMeteur caere.ors to render assistance to it,. •'The GatunissTen is hat T nvci ve r ?R the ?�4i;S prLvra*. �:,� I JL 77 �a f r araennasP (does a o`ritatas a:�rarst, affect stftorts. Oft tataws J } that the.rla can �er,"e�e s k aiex Y Cni teem syst;;s wcu t d�be Onpaitred '6 f 3Oca! erd,t,nat� s tte�e3 + athT the. sefaesi' atnosr�naf t4esa tmy �nnt nations, ;t tee nib ti" sour a4ss,. ft faybrs the Issuance of a ruLt`ngt 4 that wautlyd5 5®fits' a+r Irre "al nd state regulatory bodl`ss whe�n?,thWy>are, , dealing,.?�thxeur sa?i`cc+s: r i ' it. yarttous ehept rs 0 the Amer Ican Rah Or, aaso.can�s go�ar6�a support the ARE;Lts regyes 'fael*a greampgkver rult�ng, The Rod CnoSs worlsa cIasely wr it-h amaartaurMradlio + 1,unfiee ft bo'a that u� thou<ty,aA ateur xe= i/ dedEeate supao f�d,C+sas ler rt eff$o,pe aftons, wo�ai s'tg lt=fitean%(ssfffer and a. that its;abl IJty wm €vedFtlsi�star vit(ctfe s ltouttd ba;�l°amper-edI , ., twits.that lb-antenraF hetght ttmlttrt ns hat aatgtit be, mpo-i"d-by Maaars 92. Cftlies ands cQ�a�lftesr'(rtaa.visre;ogts parts^fit thws Untkted States ,t,�i(ed �a comments In sulsport off t'T eaRl{t.es re�ufat,for Faderei ypreemptio'n rut Jng. , The comments tr zra th¢ yrrector•otf CNN i De« ens ,'aFort, Arthur, tiara reprQse:itat t veri: ~ T%_: ff44teur'1Rad4q S®rvlce plays a v`t}at ro a. with wr O°tbf t Okiihie"progirm here. lit P1llrfi Arthur and the d aslgp aVjhese an sanaar 8nd toi ors .Pi da X grsatly to O ablI ty,-ta,coaaawdilbate durti'ng t(iees` ,_. of dtsatter:=° We dow not be,yteves there shauldl bi°any, restrtctlaons• on th,9 antannatn anal+aarer,,s �uccapt for reasonable Safety precauta na.., 'lropit`a 111'4, tormso hurricanes ,< and tornnd," way q 'I ff® hert.�n,ahe�Texan. Gulf Coas*�'Ii c6mmunxc4tlons are arbs4 ilw7s�t•y «asser_ttall, xh%eta= p�epartngofock a hurricane snd:•e"n more so,duritng recovery opeeatlons after the, , hurricane has past; 4 E.R. TCO Quarter Century ,ralass•Association took a Strang stand 1 IP favrw of the Issuance of a declaratory rut Ing. It 6etteves that Federal pr.imptIoa'M necessary se that there, *I i I be uniformity for al l Amateur radio fnstallatfons.on private property throughout the United: States 16. to Its comments, the ARRI. argued that the Cornmisston-has the jurl'sdictlon to preempt certain local land use regulations which _ frustrate or prohibit"amateur rad_to coirmunlca;icns. It said that the.,, 6 appropriate standard in pre,emptKin cases Is not the extent of state �hd E kcal Interest,jin a given rairutation, buts-atrer tie impact of that,•, regulation an.;•",`edsral goals. Its posftlan is that rederal preemption is warranted whenever local governmental regulations-relats) adversely, to the operational aspects of amateur communication., The: ARRL maintains that } - locslttfaa rcau,, tYns�t L°cr a vs�i0a. of g'ard us* devTcet. tqr pr-eciuUdikth0 �4a,eur �ennas,, isno3ludfeig� h_mfgfitrrsslrflc�rC st,,on .�. �s b ldfi�xgg;sefbacks and Oiiasensiatt llmtrtatcison;skpn, condiltonal ussi#pe }` aniennas tit sans a'-d'� iaato iru't.t+g o `Fadar4� Praamp#lad y necas��ny,.]` �. to so, nds�inn tine,azsa. : p.tann=t;ng, afforts,. �. 15 James C. &A'Cc1� �16f M eh)is1'i•ornsy who ha Faprasantad. several._ "y 1l csnateurs betors hc6t,li zon'leo%a 'fidetstCly , salfd' that r�equlrl�g; amateurs to,4 C seek varbances or sat {at4u"sa arp�av{aiitp��raofi reasonatalls antenna$, urtdll+ restr.lets the",opt tr,[dR gar mate s s aia�ons idar su ga Ott the# thel CommissGon prmr!'zs�n"fqi�,, r d,fitcas + tufcht�mpos�`anl�n.na fiaTlrgliltmt;fisfelf t iasss than feetwouse seni� a. raas Idi rap one h3 e• accoromodatlEoni of #ha. rsClrinq naedsi41 masT amateur and; the 1 sg t tt tnn_'te concat<ns niCoii'iauthor<! .spF. ; "t3 { �� ,eel`� Gnmeuants , y ti6« 11%%d ty Of La M*sa,.Cal,(rf,brn,;ta has a 7 l"ng=`s&u"lnflon wh1ch a controls amajmur antenna%. t`t"s evamenft Vafhse#o an,.a#tefs+p to reach a balanced v i`ew, nts regut Ii one fifes,nwt ter, the T ntent„ n� effect, of Pro l#ud�„tasg or vntotfill°l'1ng e#^fsc and re I i aW4,,tomA ',�"caVi'lcjns,.;' Such antennas;ma e r bunt as pong u-thelsr eonstrucfi=doas:not 1_r •uhrea§onalsiiy billoekt"Vteiis of OsHstht0ii"eywsores. J�< The reasonab,tirf,assumptlioni ins, that there'ari a1ways3 �Jf alternai°l,ves rt a glltvd6 sfta for" different ; pIacament,, andlbr methods for ae +1%10iic tcaatmsnt. Thus, both pubOIC obJ.aeti.vss,of COfttrVdlA,P[)T, kand use for the pub,l;I�e b6a;l!th�., sef„„sty. andh convenTence.. i and provldi-ng am effectfive ccmmumlcatiosls network, ' can be satisfl•ed. A blanket ruling to comp let®dy set asf do, =lcoal control, or a ruttng which -ecogniless control only , for the purpose of safety o= antenna construction, ' would be contrary to ... laq.ItI,m3tsr. local i r; controt. 17. Caersnts from the County of San DF' qp states Y `✓ while we are aware of the bencsflts provided by amateur oparcrors, +,o Op,pose q.he issuance of a i preemption ra,ling whic3h aculd:'slevara 'antenna effectiveness( to a position above afl other considerations. We"must, howaver,`argue that the f t > k ., � { J 71 7. � i�$�t99 ! .n'neni"must iasysa tha.apai I t'ty to ,,l+aces �� rs�a ae ei�imi#strhons�taponrtha placement and: 00 hece� its fil ai Rvilfty is°snacessagW to: : s ure ��ha3� rmekd�nc* dec,hsia maker `eve° hec i author to�p„ptset;tllai pubrl9'a hea:} h,_ safctj and- well�fc�r=a�,o�alt+l c�'Fat�zenss, . I A.,C6.00 us cork;" F! trou,i. tr 3 l k� c�aan¢p8841 Br.Sn torpor¢fant dtr"Ntortaiacrrgs�4�f Maur begs la to-y poxeP �yanai;hattot� foca;�r h,�ment�`�our• j CiT+ni s!lont�rs apgra.via`t+o �t�>:�AP11, XvlOWPO Rests ,. wfidf esaf>i ilai a� �lrettl�pa�t�icy��:, No►aava ,.any, rag�fr�}at�«t' adop$e¢tby ioaaSt {trsts3dic�itliacr�+l`t1, be?ov+tYut tid�t b,9s your G +lilslot' t tv sucli�rae ;u� i�on wss+dete,ciaitnada#os+be unkeasrana�31leo, 18 TWIPMy of',Kndiersan,. t,d,,661 ,- summartzadn sozn k of, the;prohtems that,face !.peat«^eoumi�tTts:: ti i sore synspathsivi+ ft thenconceonw ofthesaw anienrtaF ownersacispx i` un}t®e�tani9 #h8tia gaLn,fiher.nax+6mum recepiatoait troaaatttaet,r dc.vtuls+sy-ap#il'matt:locAtton I necessmry,=, kbwaiver;#t;hvx pr sormat!"aav;at resafaentttiale zorifli d'i tt9 i is ax ti i Ive ai�aA y n !ghbkiritiaod s�.Sisk,j�e2parQi#zedb b ;p i ac{dngi these• antennim,t n frorit•yordss'ot" hams.,, mu or, prob:l ems �:. aft pubi%tGc safety, h6 .$aen RneountimOr, 1. parrt�c�rl ah t y� v l=9iiosf b lodkaga1 as tq;and pedestrian scces 1.`tr addiitl; , a.l.l communit las ase tricaQ° pr,itit yartous6uaiKidQng, lot<- tzes. Many, v bu,l i lEng; to ft are spa.smear! that estaW I sh.e smtback+ regpdrements ttn order to preserve adequate al r aa& I,I ghitT are-vmlinertabit ei to the,unragui ated p!acameni` of titast- antennas. the exercise of. preesptive authority by the FCC 11)granting thls& requost would not be in the b.*st intorest of the genera.} public. - 19. Tht'National Association of Counties CNACOI, the American Planning Asgoclation (APA) and the National lzague of Cities (NLC) all opposed the issuance of an anTrinna preem-atzon rut Ing. NACO emphastred'that federal and state power'nust he viewed i�,harmony, and :yarns that Federal #ntruslon into local concerns of health, safaty and w6atfare coudd'veaken the tradItionai police power exercl sad by the state and undu.1yi`.nterfere with the leVJtim4te activitles of the srates. NLC believed that'hoth j, 1 _..4.. ixodsM,i and ac01"�ai�41�'a st" n-omi articq ksatls€#ate' + ithoaT prasinpttng:toq>t�i F: '< auf6+o ltX to ," s� rep it Pa�tt s~#.s�tsur red10 a:etsni as. Tlt�MA said nsY xlii iL`GyS�u Vol, duo = ' mfii'fhs fss>ar of reg:�t ii ling crstarcfir anttannas +tai#h this=b*411, p e►nmslnti and,ir. K fhs stets and r`ud.ora�S i 20. Whea comV10e�71ngt pruempnt,han„ ue si��da {ln�uifih we Cansi i.'-tu4 cant i rov i@ians 1;,�`�193' +nTIYi DIf1g1RQF1l1�tr�Y IQIS ielSi3t any {�O1S atsich ths.cGn�sirl u �us s _ h�ir� Does nA CR�i�a#r it �'iG� tod tmtii epos rtct peclh�ibrit `afies fr ozacgkt�n ere eser d�to he<s a ws These are the or l'CA paksrt � Fs �a��a�rc The Slc su eG, sa'erveer s . p ai sma� 14` h ,. � S° } �. .,_ prgvi4Qs fhs theyccnsl k} + t �!tlso ivm-Ct the Ek1 taq S aes stta $uoer ald�any sr:1i� ax Gp rs G yen. tSza hes�e rensfFse "�stat aws "� tx"� i issi�ib a s1rY_x r p r Y b• �arsAi od o f op xygg I sf }jC+cngres:F +any ex re ss �r��,e�+pxt ire sr�t(rats 'wrrdp Saar x..ratty y iia$rt U19� t � �a apCt ate r$Xfie indl rsF is Oft 7171h n�VN4 7 caesp io 1 i c�rrr� }�yl�- t�ipn)df i �d4 !L'2 41, j� t 1iF� i yW 4 �dRy�ijtlxlawi Ylp h Pn i !nS that #is# rru td l+ li*# trt}i oo rmpdj7 ,F +th7,`tsnP'peeefipfi caul'ds3 r, found in can,!;;ossil'onssh nraguFpafpr se scslOi3t�� as sa.pecvsfive that: It wou id be<Fe®s alt"�r tam assutt ang es �st ed i t,I I ,- d?tc.#I+i11,i1` y the states to supprN wnr �� •� ,� tfi s, �. d3t3'U 5 r` � f i '9'982h� f 6ns�� p► f 4Yr tii6y Iaii, `I a'. aa,pant.ed when state: tra[c' f�i ic�sR�rfih tad'sl attr.,t�a�r« Stta��c�;�l ic4s ma"y occur when, �'orr�ipitl�ance �r its � h atlsrat ert9 sir�ate�� ,t�t st stops I'S a Physical Irroosatb�'til t�tIa F14I:.� i T �vae a ! .. 373 U.S. t3Z, t42, fi#3 G195�, ar e�h`'�'��Fie��e, IIIM�p"R'fafr ",ms art- obstae•.er �. to they aceomp;l I�hriirt° and ezAmk afidt sod of Chao fuss pupeosed ab je ;f'ives of Congress,,t M , n r, fedora.!, regulati'o n�;ver slits samec preeurptlt°vat efRct as,1e4ttsrat`stats;te .�4` FtdULLUv -Ad'r ;Mmn b I 21. The sit it -he'foro,us rogutres ins t6 determtnoth .,.;e I to wh Ich state :n� l cca I'2cn bag r+gu i at :arcs,+pay,ton f!I�tI' it It1i�46derm" Policies concerntog amateur radto opar8 ors. 22. Few,.mattars camp before us present such a clear dlcAOtomy of viewpoint As doa_, 'Ma !r,Stant',tssus: Tics'c'Ittes, countres, ids`-rl, communitles and ,iousing asscct%aticns sass an: alti tgation to aI# of t�vllr _ citizens and try to address ,hair concerns. This Is accomp)lahed thr.^RAgh reguluticns, ordtnartas *r� covenants oriented towar# fine health,, saftroy and geaarai welfare a: '`nose tney reptate. At the`ripp Site ,iole 6r3 the IAAi.,idu ! c� our �r r' ors-and, their snppc'+ ytaugs who are tcouhied dy ;oc-1 re,uts.lons prnlch:ray trhl�)it the use o;.amateur s'ations or, r. -icros ',.stt1r__s, TcT,i ly preciude amateur communications. Aligned with the epeestors 'a-a-suca anttties'as the Departmar.T of Dsfenss; the Amerl_.an Red Cross ar:d ''ccal civil defense and emergency, organizations wno hove `oord in Amtsur RadI* a pcal of ski!Iad red operaT rs acid a readRiiy v�ilabi.e ,b'ac9upr netwgFk. In tnls situation, wa 601 *VW� 1t , appro¢r+ato Fs ttka a bafanca batwoon thar ederzsC lntare0fi In promo g amaf:eur op$��atdogs�and thm ted'titnate Inta�rsts of;Ioca�i §oYsrnmm�sn , :s 'In ra#ttatAtt,9 focaf is&ing maitars� The ec:n�rsto�e c� predbtat p€tr d iti$s"Iion is that a. rebsonabila acta+tir`Aodat't h ma be.moos t�tweon tics ��.o.sddos. �., �3 P�iesr tan is primarily a functionkof Rhe axtenf o` :;the confJtstit' betwoon fedarai :and state LA, local 4gu tOT on Thus, In C s hdairina whetheroeit~re9i%ftiass or po fCkl@s can �o`dara�tp-a stt�at� egu I�aAt lo{,. se t may consider aeic3l fac ,b e�b *fifty aev+�t�fty aT vvfpt an tis ramsobff ' uttiasrti�y,figth 's atsns`�roguptatd is� #h,ls�scx rr ,++�e ass pre dovsiy recognLsed 4s i�ag�ltiieita"ert tadrf en{ sfmt� infatrests' acted,,to focaC zoning rti,tmt'lons Pt r axaoapte, in iarth Sa,talxt"I'te tahlimst _(nc., 9' ECG 2 "f2 j(3983#:,,srse.rrcoQniYed-thaf r. count srvai.t Ong stztp lntereslr% inhere, in ' this pre sqt s Itul* (oh. Fier��%x'W %14:,we do noS ,rig c prx ltad"0 a statR or Svpaq !tit from axarcts ng jur:�s gttian ovmV cer-Utn elements of i an SMATi< pperatdait thstfi-pnl otly`m4y° tail w;tthfn its a�thoizkity. such a$r"Xon.fbg or pub IJc S4,0t Y and hsaf;#* ,tn 'question is not undsrtakpo."a a,pre#e�tt fork the actua! purpose. of fra-4ti ft'hg achiievoment,of,the:4 r"Anent' federal WJoct lve and. �c tong as the nciv4iederal r �l'ptto. ix applied' l a non dtscriminatory mannor. 2a Simi tarfpy 'we reco ntxe kisra tdafi ther'es dare certain garurai state and Ioca.d Interests which may, in their even-handad application, legitlootely affect i4w.otlr rad a faclldtles. Nonetheiostf, there is also a strong federal intsObst In promoting amateur communtCstio.os. Evidence of this Interest may be fasnd In the comprehan0vo set of rules: that the ComntSsston has adopted to rsguIate the am& ,ur service.5 Thn. rules set forth`proceeures for the licensing of stations attid a arators, frequency a$lccations,. technical standards which amateur radio equipmer- rust meet and coerating practices which amateur operators must 4ollow.` We recognize the Amateur radios service as a voluntary, noncommorclal m comunication service, particularly with respect to provldirg amergenc, corrsnlcattans. Moreover, the amateur ratllo service provides a reserve of trained operators., technicians and electronic experts nho.can be cat lec on to times of national cr tcc*[ er!ergencles. By its nature,, the Amat+-»; ' Radio Service also proviwes the opportunity for`lndivtdual operators to further International gcodw]lt. Upon'weighing, these interests, we , 5 47 CFR Part 97. l i �x St 7'NN 3 .r' �+SYM � � 'r 'fi • "'slnFic" ^r �:'a•y.T, -:'a. s a to 1` beIlovp ;'al=3d preempt ton poi icy is. tiracrartod. State and I�CaI . ► , regu i atlons that oporete•tc'prac furs arisataur comssua;Ceat ohs try,them comnitles,are in direct ccaflict xCtIVfederal objeeti.ves and, must be � prcampted. 25. Because aoa'feur sta#ion r creetrt ieataCans are on C<y as off eat i yr as the antennss emp l.a ` a„tennk ho.igAt r4jtrCct Eons°d•Irectty of face the off ectivvnesstof am9te4r Coil'maa<OZ& Cons. Bones aasateur,antenna•:; configure lens requ ire wo. suusfiie;t'i:a-1 Crtstoitef�o s..t#tah others if they ar'e to pro+lde the amateur operafoc xflth the coalman lcat?(ons°that helshs, desires to engage In:. For!,exampl+er -an antenna array for Intern"ational amateur eoexnunlcattan—rw•1li 1:6fer-1roi am antenna"asset to contact other L amateur operators aT.)thortnr d&starcez. YiN rl-l.l not, however, bpecCfy aayk particular height ,I dtatC r-"Iov rh,Cch a I0ca"I governmrat may not, regulate, nor wild we suggest the_precis�� onggago that must be conta+lred In local ordinances, such es,m*chanlsms for spscfa axerpttsane,. vat lances, or conditional u.6 perij1'tsc '' Cttverthelpss, loea•l 'regu,le t'axas Which involve placeanen', screening, Or�hsight^of antennas based on howlth, safety., Or aest`Otic cons I derar tons musr" f crafted to P-Ccommod,at, a reasonably amateur camwunlcsttons, and to represent the,min,Jura3 praoticabI*ereguTatton to 3ccompilsh t13 local avthorityps Iegittmate. purpose..- 6 26. Obvlrusly, we do not have the staff or fdnanclal resources tor rev tax a Q st;:te and kcal leas t°.t affect amateur operations, We are confident', ha»av�±-, ;nat stare and local :governments wtit, endeavor to 1e9isl4te In a m.rnet-- that affords appropriate re;ogniticxa to ttt%. imRortant ftvloraI interest :t stake here and --ereby avoid unnecessary con 1Ictr with federal' policy, as tall :s time-consuming and expensive litigation In this urea. Amateur opus--tors wao aeilove that local or *Ivo► governments have cash cverreachF+, = t--3-3E., have aracduded,;,accomplishment of ihelr iegltimate communtca�tons goals, may, In ada('�Jon, use ttfls dtcument to ibring our policies to tna attentior:ref local triounais and forums { 5 We relteraTe rh.'.t our ruling herein does not' reach restrictive covenants In private contractual agreements. Such agreements are voluntarily entered *,.To by the buyer or tenant when the agreement is j executed and do not csually concern this Commission. iI l A�-119 �+ '—�^Mc^s;4,-F"��t� '� �. "`�a ''�-'Y \�A9"'�•�'� � mow',t�,'ryca � LL.:ti 4 27. t1�"e C� 1y, #tss`Ro.�ast for OocFaratc y Ru.lingj�fIf'd July 9b r t98�, by t'440 I,elart.lta4to ftlay,teiguas Inc . IS G4ANtlzul,to fha extentr ,{ 4 fncsTcs od Rere qs end;, Gn .aLLf:U othir, rispiccts, fS D1:N1:ED. F FEDEFVAL COMUNICATTLPf($ COMISSitom, wA � WiIiIam J. trlcarfco Socrrtery �I l r, e t .3✓ ` N 6 p ' CCt`t oatcto a�V�s:aN NUM9CR ONE CIviC C,ENT�:R CIPCIC •T` _l,�t ����111 �'. FOURT. Fl0^',A 1' 1wntC3 I..MKetKMAN': P.01 Box loss y ANOREW Y:ARC2YMB%1 RALPM Q.MKNSOK BREA,CALIFORNIA,,92622-1054 I. (f71aj 9®0-490t 4 O.CRAIG FOX TCIEPNONE m^RTMA JQ GEt¢t,.ER : r.fat 6$I-:3$It ' October, 20, 1986 George J. Rohrer Attornev at Law x Rohrer & Holtz A Professional Law Corporation 1421 North Brookhurst Street Suite 126 Anaheim, California 92801 �,. Re: Charles Spetnagel Dear Mr. Rohrer: Thank you for providing this office with the federal and state authority dealing with :Imataur radio antennas. The federal case, in particular, was enlightening c-,tith regard to the FCC's limited preemption;: That preemption appears to b ' identical to their earlier announced=preemption dealing with satellite dishes. After reviewing the text of the FCC's preemption as ='-d stated in the Thernes case, the, present question appears to a address itself primarily toward development standards applicable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. more specifscally, 'although the FCC has'imposed a limited preemption dealing with regulation of amateur rad-ir antenna heights, it is the opinion of this- office that exa •!ring regulations, arguebly impacted thereby, are not rendered invalid unless the public entity is unable to articulate a legitimate health, safety or welfare interest furttkered thereby. This is, not to say that specific reasons for , an antenna height limitation, for example, reed be articulated before such a standard is imposed, it is our position that the requisite health, safety or welfare'consider- ations are implicit in the SQ-foot height restriction, just as such concerns are implicit in any number of structural requla tions and standards. 1 � i Ra George J. Rohrer" � Qctaber 2a, 'Xgs$'6 Pace Two ' i As you seem to be generally familiar with the Rancho j Cucamonga Munici ,c, Code,, Section'17' 04 04.`0 deal,uig with "variances" t may provide some furthe+ se--laef for your,:Alicn.�.. As.,with all variances, the procedure is ;png-xtided in order to accommodate special topagraphi al car other'physieal conditions peculiar to a particular piece. of property. In the event. YOU, are unfam%liaz with the prospLens of Se,c�tion 17.04.0407, we have enclosed a copy of that=section, for your use. zo summarize, although we acknowledge the limited pre- emption announced by: the FCC,, we do-not believe that its language invalidates 'Sectdoh I7.,Ga.0 0 or the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal { Code th, antenna height? Relief from the r�ntrictions dealing wi of that section mi,,gtvt possibly be obtained thzough the use of � variance, procedures aaix�ble.. Should o+u care to disc ; thi matter at J y ,., � 4r�ater, length, please do not hesit7tte tol..ezitact the uidersigned at your convenience, or feel free to discuss this matter with City staf your convenience. very truly yours,. D. Craig Fox Deputy City Attorney ` City of Rancho Cucamonga,, r, DCF;ljl j. Encl !!� Cc:, Brad Huller, City Planner . s RESOLUTIOM 00. ., AS@L1T wRAHC# C,�k� CAPkANNIE COR4ISSION �r DEM 'IWG 1lA0lFli3 vwOB T�Q_t.}AIVE fH M14X4 7' l Ik Y�E i i3 '" E5 71 Of S7i TGI AT'S327 ..AR...r ROE A. RECITALS M on December 79 1483, the 'City Council, of the City—_of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordifnance. k1 providing fore the �� qut tj*"R9�of antennas. On November 1.4,E°198�i,..�n applicat�,on.-Was filed and accepted on the above-described pre kt.'- l ., (iiiI On January ,28, 1987,, the planning Comoission- held,a. (61y advertised public hearing pursuanVtdr tktion 05854 G� the California 0overnm+ent,Zoda. �., B. RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho 'Cucamongc planning Commission resolved as follows 1. This Commission hereby siecifical,l Inds that all the facts set forth in the Recitals, part A, o this ltMlution, are true and . correct. 2. Based upon substantial evident presented to`-this Commission during the above-referenced January 2k,1987 hearing;; including the written Staff report, and the written, signed end verified � application of the applicant, this Comission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at 5327 a Carol Avenue on-a lot presently improved with a house, garage and a 50 foot radio antenna; b. The property and surround-lag properties are in the r Very Low Residential District; c. The existing 50 foot radio antenna does not comply " with the. 35 foot height limit when not in use (unertended) as measured from ground level as required by Development Code Section 17.08.0601. 'Further, the application requests to -extend the antenna height to 70 feet; E VARIANC $tip January 28, 19 r Page 2 �t`\ Ir d. the exiztiiog:za foot ra4im antenna ryas erectid without proper permits for the,footings,�prior to..construebion., 3.. Based upon, substantial evildence presented to this Commission during tha above-r!efevLanced January 28, 1987 hearing and upon ' the,, specific findings, of facts set forth in Paragraphs I and 2 above. 'this. G'oftiss; hereby finds. and concludes as follows; a. That strict, or literal interpretotl.an and'enforcemeit ` of the. spec,04 regu atioh would! not resu'.t In 3 practical difficidty or unnecessary physical hardship' Inconsistent with the objectives of the Develope-:ct Code. b. That there are no exceptional or extrarrdinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the- property involved or to the ir►tended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. c. That strict or 'literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified 'regulation would not deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same di"stri'ct. d. That the granting of the Variance will Constitute a 1 grant of special privilege inconsistent with; the limitations on: other properties classified in the same di strict. i e. That the granting of the Variance f 0-11 be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. o. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission; hereby denies the application. r; APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH'DAY OF JANUARY, 1987. PLANNING cowissm of THE CITY OF RANCHO CICA14oNGA 1 BY: E. David ar ,er, Chairman J ATTEST: Brad Buller, 'Deputy secrieUry ' Page S� t IT Y, g d &A110, Dd u rt i pta at ter Ptann,iOg Cn ssx of Rancha Cuca�cia9ad, do, t �c ct€Y t a t khe acega In Res�4 reguT'arly fin s°q tc � 'Vis,it a tad pted y 't i l n � °Goa isatfi�oi at e City n Ranch f�uagaYgar m ±ti�glotTre Fnni �g Caifssian ;deli an tha �Bth"day c#"J'aaug�• 138 } � .Cfie fai uw;ng AYES: comet sild dEtIS. NOES: COWJSs!' ONERS: ABSENT: COROSSIRNER'S: tf y G li k 4 - r C t MY OF RANCHO.CUCAMONGA � STAFF REPORT ` . 1977 January 28,. 158 ' r � Tot Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, Cily PTanner BY. Greg i;aRe;. Assistant Pi4enner SUBJECT: HOME. OQCUPATe1.ON,PERMIT 86-210'- TAYLOR Appeal` of Staff s ec�s,ton eny,tng, a, piw ccit a on-"Permit at 8169 Malachite Avenge. 1. 8ACK6ROUN1?: Onr October 21, 1986,. Mr. Joe. Taylor submitted &n app rca on for a dome. Occepatton Permit to allow construction of styrofoam sign_ friserts within the garage of V singl'e family residence located' at 8159. Maltachitea Y The application indicates that styrofoa►s, sign iinser-ts -yes no 1'arger than 3 feet by 8 feet wr uid be, fabricated, ut"FlAt 'ng, mechanized saws as well as glues. The garage: wa774 previously, used by a former owner for a non-confbrmi+ng upholstery, shop. 11. ANALYSIS: A Home Occupation is defined by the Development Code as: `HOME OCCUPATION: An accessory occupational use , conducted y a resident of a dwdlIfng as a secWn v use thereof, which is conducted entirely with$m a dwPll),ng by the inhabitants thereof, which use is clearly incidental to the use of the structure for dwelling purposes and. which does not change the character thereof, and for which there- is no display, no stock-in-trade, n; _ commodity sold on the premises and no mechap al equipment used except that necessary, for housekeeping purposes.' Applications for Home Occupation Permits are evaluated on the basis of fourteen specific criter,a. to assure that suc4 occupations are compatible with the residential character of the surrounding neighborhood. These include: o "The use of the dwelling for such home occupation shall be clearly -incidental and subordinate to its: use for residential purposes by its inhabitants." U V. ITEi9 L s.: 1 z�+,Lssx S6-21 i9S7 c page'2 Suts3ect ti es ali be us��+gnare: vision ,core sh.^ ,yoke. tel w ant pr p aces nai`se, radio erties•t a e�;eipn` cre elec ri su rounding prop of arty saran. 'f F praR yibratijsrNptiYe uutoard appeyidenCe of e iI odor, d I interf erence o-change o otl er yi sibl re or shall a preMises. pr ,� materials any I o he builds A yt&age- °n outside � the actiyi Y' ;not inyolye building t ti on tha I use Shall accessory dete�ina fpilawin9 a athelies -i� an salted in rih n, for the suPp ctures. cysts Stru of the prppOoath,aboveuse revi ensiye TO t l o a I Staff a d not cpnf of *.,re in residentaA, use ess is ri�ary hay c\ea a reasons sign constr Lion a i ota 'A3he a P sed to "p4erate A, Woui d ee nei ghb rty was Pu Cati on of Of the the prop a Rli ration use p yibra t sty>I bk; ss p d saws and theoi5e. 'ad3acen hanize ate tat ever to I operation Of od sty could 9detri� She opera the fir.°R siau1& cbe onducted cues an .4ht:h ey• being putward and foes ray?er'ts ; ns is t residential p storage w icti changes idin9 essOry t in40Fbricte Rr5ey, pautside e ateriais rancehc{ t gvg appea is starin n Zhe aplP b ilotngs• staff' reaupation storage bu ye analYs''.Iilacoe Occupat�pn os- om s6. ON; Based 5 pon a rmbo e'Theo rpathean pewit 10- iar: accup I�DA�L ng Cot th the No'ee LiA- 91'a iaconsASIttA tine appeal o d deny r �tipns an ted* • des tfully 1 er. 01% i City pl grad B 21 e1 pPlicat anne'' sitb-Qen �ccupp�ion,peret�er of �peial pttacwnts: E�b t . 1A L:`elt f.L �,xhib ' M.T S[Cily t00� Z4 i �M1 Y SUBJECT": APPM- ..TO DEENTAL, OE �4p"STNBS6'OPER4ii.ClXG LICENSE:'IN€ t'IaQAM014Gk LIFF6RNI2�{; THERE Wni BE VERY LITTLE CUTTM TG ON THE`PRB3 SE5. i! LOT LESS;;InAw THE Ownr,BEFORE ME WHO DID U?HOLSTERING: POR A GOOT) 8 OR 9 y�*IS�'OR MO'3E. WE BOUGHT TH7GS HOME SO ;TkkT WE COBLD, OP81-WTE A SWXLL BUqXNE Ss!-,# WE WOULD.. ; NOT` tMAVE PURCHASED 'WdIS I?ROPBRTY SINCE. THE FIRBWO#Kfi OF ME' BEIN7. TURNED pOWN AFTER gift I AP7�TED FOR A LICENSE AND YOU DID NOT HAVE TO SITE,ME `I DID`}A'LITTLE 1XVIESTI"`ZATTNG ON knr OWN, OF OSSER IN-HOME ' OPERATINt^a`,SITIIiTTONS. $HERE_�AR'E A LOT OF WELDER ,MECHANI+?S, CABINET NAI{ERS AND �� STERERS, PPOS 09 i1r BUSINESSES r' GOING'ON. IN Fs?7=-NG AID OHSumVINC Ir`-4-7dNDERED--TO MYSELF 11 HOW M i'qy OF THESE PEOPLE TOOK THE 'TIME TO EV.'N APPLY AS I DID'' TO DO IT TIaM RIGHT WPr, BUT MOST r"O ,_.+LL CONFORM TO � THE RULES::ANTSI REGULAi`r-T—lXa'THE CITY WA T.P. I:,ONLY 'WANT TO ::'-" OBEY AN2 FOLLOW. THE C0JZRECT GUIDE; LINES, BUT I WILL, NOT- BE A VICTIM OF CIRCUMSTANCES. I WANT NO-TROUBLE I JUST WANT TO LIVE A PEACEFUL LIFE IN A FINE CITY WITfa""NT SMALL BUSINESS. PLEPi iE SET A COURT DATE AND I WILT, BE - THANK YOU. y �TMr �f t �� by 1 ik : CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO odGA LU ^t Kyv JeStsy King V ' Chine J. ' is Zg3T �9 'II ]a¢a bilk'R Rlc6ud t`L DeBI Psmslt b.%4, October 23, 1986' Joe Taylor 8159 Malack;Ae Avenue Rancho Cucamonga;--California 91730 SUBJECT: HOME eOCCUPATAU PERMIT 86-210 Dear Mr. Taylor: the City 3s in recoipt of'yoyr application of October 21 1986,for a Home OccupaVen Permit to clinstruct styrofoam. sign inserts at 8159 1; Malachite Avenue.: the intent of a home occupation' is to allow a re,ident to,conduct an acces'ory occupational use that is contained zatir+ely within the ile>eltg, and is incidental te, the aiiowev residential use. Such uses shoulRr-6nt`, gre vary atly frola tlic5e normally found within a residential area. The eligibility of a use for Now Occupativn, Permit is. determined through the evaluation of fourte- s+,Qcific criteria, which are listed . on the back of the Hors_ Occusation Permit appi.ication. Through,staff I r review sue- >as ueEn determined that the proposed vse does not :n:r+,ti.-;� following criteria: 'Qsat the proposed use be incidental and subordinate to the residential use.; It is the Ci,ty`s determination that a sign construction business is of more intensive use than allowed by the definition of a home: occupation and would be incompatible with the primary residential use. o No equipment or processA!z. shall' be used on the subject property which creates li,ise, sooke, glare, fumes, odor, vibration, electrical, ,adio or television interferanse disruptive to surrounding propertye.. Your application indicates that sigft inserts no larger than 3 feet t<,j feet wDuld be constructed an the v premises util ia, ,g motorized tools as well as '13,ue. Such processes typically rsnerate noise or emmiiLions OF whim,•` could 'advyrsely impact surrounding residential ' propei7ties. �+, i L— 440 Taylor s tkt,ber 23 HOPS'Air-410' Page Cue to the r44sons above. you appTicatfon, iar a Hord Ra&106 Fera►ft has 4eert dem ed 6fe sugg st,'that yap I'ocate' yaar.a �siness {in a. cnvsse,rCtar or i t3 axrrd aP fr'o rt atat�,. Sdie" a' I h Ye at� St � ►s,. pease, do not hey o Ca aCi the it Sincerely, p ING v? IO t pr t Da `n. Senior F anr.er Y; OC:f,'g:vc cc: 9etty king,. Business License a ' J I J ,i f , Ate-- NCR City of RanchoHome cupat! f ucamo Permit � pplicat . LOCATION OFF PROPOSED' OME-OCCUPATION: V d .NAME OF PROPOSED BUSINESS rA j:M APPLICANTS NAME prVj ADDRESS OWNER ❑ RENTEia Property ow—is signature will 6e required,or z a signed statement from the owner approving such use of the dwelling must be submitted with this application. Property Owner's Signature. �. FULLDESCRIFTIOHOFPrIOPWS PBUSINESS-�SPECIFIO.. t� C I / /VS CAi LU 4!3 ACTIVM '. .. .FULL DESCP!PnON OF BUSINESS ACnvrnG,OCCURRING IN:DWELLING,INCLUDING SOUIPMEN?AAiCAMOUNT OF DWELLING USED:— - SESPEC�IF/IC I w ,U 1 herebycertify that,i have read the Home Occupation Permit requirements, full understand the �y p q � Y impiicati ,and can comply with all of these requirements. ` LU SIONA LIRE f A Home Occupation!San accessory occupational use conducted by a resident of a dwelling as a sec" 901, I dary use thereof,which is conducted entirely within a dwelling by the inhabitants,which use is cleat incidrMall to the use of the structure for dwelling purposes,which dace trot change the chy `iar of the ' building or neighborhoods and for which there is nu display,n� stock•Initrade,no co fnmodidY,61d on the 0 premises and no m- fiani?far equipment used except that e"3sary for housekeWpc"oses.The Home Occupation nPegnit,may mtzi'for a specific use+if It meets tho criteria listed er(,this page. 1. The use of thj�d,,peiiing for such horse occupatlop shall be clearly incidental and:.subordinate to ` its use./Gfor'residential purposes by Its Inhab'Rantfi ¢- 2 No petgona other than members of the fa Eily such act who reside on the premises shall be engaged in # n ity, 3. There sh (d�Ese no change in the outward appearance of the building or premises,:or other visi�riii 1 - evidence of the activity. 4. There shall be no salesof producteon the premises,e�cept produce(frultor vegetables)grown on the subject property. } S. The use shall not all customers or clientele to visit dwellings:However;incidental uses such r as music lessons,and the sale ofproduce may be permitted It the intensityofsuch instructions is approved by the Cit t, Kanner. S. No equipment or proc0ssos shall be used bra the Subject property- $ p party which craate3 noise,smoke, glare,fumes,odor,vibration,electrical,radio or telei interference disruptive to surrounding properties. 7. No home occupation shall be conducted In an accessory building.Normal use of the garage may be permitted if such use does not obstruct required parking: A I 8. Not more than 15%of the total squarer footage of the dwelling,or one room of the dwelling whichever Is less,shall be used for the home occupation. S. The use shalt not involve storage structures. of materials or supplies in an accessory;building or outside any 10. Use o`•the Un!t-A States Postal Service in conjunction with the home occupation shall be done by means or a post office bb'x. 11. Nu signs shall be displayed in conjunction with the home occupation,and there shalt be no adver- tising using the home address. 12. A home occupation permit is rot va Id until a current City business license Is obtained. 13. The use shall not involve the-use.of commercial vehicles for delivery of materials to or?corn the premises,other than avehicle notto exceed a capacity of 1%tons,owned by the operator of such home occupation. 14. If an applicant is not the owner of the property whero a home occupation is tootle conducted,then a signed statement from the owner approving such use of the dwelling must be submitted with the application. APPROVED BY- DENIED EiY: - f- Or�idItlons: soner Rea gs ng, - DAL. LP u: F"W'OW r V t ; CITY OF Rt',.�LdCHO CUCAMONGA SURF REPORT �UCAbfp 5 t-, O d DATE: January 28,, 1987 aar, 1 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Wier, City Planner BY: Chris Wdstman, Ass4stant Planner SUBJECT: DE.V,ELOPMENT0.99VZEW' 86741 AR.ICAL PROPERTIES Development rev;ew�, o►�,� 4 , square aizo story-of e'building on 4.24 acres of land fin the Haven )Avenue: Overlay District, Subarea 6 iri the Industrial specific Plart at'the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street, APN: 209-411-15. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION., A. Acti on eques_ mprova7 of site plan and elevations. 0. Surroundina Land Use and Zonfnw ortH - vacanz, UP =area South Vacant, ISP (Subarea 6) Eases vacant, ISP (Subarea 6)_ West Vacant, ISP (4ubarea 6) C. General Plan Designations_ a Project Site. :-rnaustrial rarK North Industrial Park South Industrial Park East Industrial: Park West Industrial Park D. Site Characteristics: The_•tproject site and the adjacent north and east properties are vacant. The: grade: difference between Haven ¢'.fie and Project Site changes from approximately C 2 feet at the south property line to 8 feet at the north �. Property line. E. , Parking Calculations: Number Number, Type Square Parking of Spaces of Spaces rs of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided F Office 77,821 V250 311 319 t ITEM i PLANNING �t�4��SION°'aTPIFF REPORT DR- 86-41 ARY'C'AL'PR'dkRTIES January 2% 1987 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: ' A'..BacTcground: The"Spring Haven Corporate renter, Phase I,, was approved + on June 25, 1986. The a0prov`al included a 2-story office building (33,217 souare feet), parking:.lot (319 -spaces) ' and pad; Tocat$on for a future building, Phase II, ' (46,921) w fiPhase I.I, as submitted, is smaller than the Phase, Z.' conceptual approval (4'�,504) thereftlre,, the park: requirement of 31 . spaces at a ratio of I space per 2,40 square feet of bu lding is being exceeded by 8;1 spaces. , k, B. Design tleview•Committee: The Committee, (Suzanne Chitiea, Larry 'McKiel, and Brad Buller) reviewed the design on January 8, 1987 and recommended approval of the building design as submitted, with the, conditionthat the type of spandrel 'and vision glass used,)y_reviewed and approved by .the City. Planner to ensure-mere will not be "ripple" distortion as a result of the type- of glass used. i ` III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: That the proposed project is consistent with the goals and policies. of the General Plane and in conformance with the Development Code,, Industrial Specific Plan, and all' other applicable City standards. That the proposed project. conforms with: the Design standard.i set forth in the ISP Raven Avetue Overlay District. IV. RECOMENDA ION: j Staff recommends that the Commission approve Development Review 86 41 'through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions. Resp fully s ed, o Br u7 er City Plainner BB:CW:to Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "BR Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Elevations (Phase II) Resolution of Approval with Conditions rr del .a„ " �,i..= •rear � '� q:. a \ M l\ • 1 p� - d � BSI w t ° '�.7, L ; Ww a.. 2 F t 7 J" 1 It 1 1 It s s �y J w S'a k ��Ot LL_ �gv o x IIA(A.tea C a�� 71 1.1 w+ 1 "v y ���p �r _ TM'�r a,�;.,+e�^. gn�•; "T,iF '^' , .r°.=... p:� u�g'+r'. r a-' rl F • if w r. + j fi� II C3�uM 0 0, us ter. t RESOLUTION NO. i A 21, LU�TIQ1i[ OF'THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA 'PIANNIt COMMi'SStON ' APP. ING DEYEL4PMEPlT REYEIi FlO $6-4'9 LOCATED A� THE NORTi}iEAST GORNER .QF 6T�It STREET ANA HAltEN AVENSiE IN:THE HAYE!J iIYEHUE OUERCIIY' DI`SRfiCT QE THE INDU51RIAL SPECIFIC PLAN. WHEREAS,., on the 10th day° of December,, llfW, a complete appl icat'lar, was filed by Art4- 1 Propertiies' for review ''f the.!eboye-described project,' and C? WHEREAS,. on the 28th day of January, 1987,, the Rancha OUcamonga Planning Coaision heEd a�' eeti;ng'to'cons'irder the'abav�e-descri(b �pro3:ect. s" NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamo.-iga Planning Gommi•svion resolved'as fol l owsz SECTION I: That the following,can be met: 1. That the' proposed project is consis'�i4t with then objectives^of, the'General Phan; and 2.- That the proposed use, is in accord with Oe objective. of the Deve.opmenL Code. and. the .pure es of the district in which,the si^tti is lrocated; and 3. That the propose, use is in compliance with, each of the applicable; plv�visions' of the Development Code; and 4. That the proposedcyse, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will rat"'be detrimental to the �- public 'health, safety, or, walfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. k; SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment'anTs fiat a Negative Declaration was previously issued on June 25, 1986., SECTION 3: That Development Review No: 86-41 is approved subject to the fol a_; ng con tions and attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING 1 1. Samples of the glass materials used shall be approved by the City Planner prior. to the issuance of building permits to ensure that there will not be "ripple" distortinn. V _ PLANNING Cb I� tWR MUT-1011 NO. �,VELQP.M EN'f ]REW1 it 06-41 January. 2S, 1987 ` Page 2 c; EHGIHEERING M. 1 Overhead utilities: A. Have Avenue - An In-lieu fee as contribution to the future . undergrounding of the existing overhead '" utilities (telecoNwhication, and electrical, except for the 66KY electrical} on the opposite sic- of Haven,Avenue shall be paid {; to the City prior to the issuance of.building permits. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length from the center of 6th Street to the north project boundary. B. 6thv Street - The existing overhead utilities (teleeommunieation and Lelectrical, except for the 46KV electrical) on the ,roject side of 6th Street shall-be undergrounded from the first�ala on the wesE,xide of Haven Avenue to the first pole offt,zE east of the pr�1'ect's east boundary prior to public kVrovement j acceptal�i or occupancg, whichever occurs first. Refi6drsement' J of tne-hall-'he City adopted cost for undergrounding from future 1 development as it occurs on the opposite side o1 th�,street is. feasible, because the property is undeveloped,-' The a�tigint shall provide a deepened or flared footilig along the crest wallsLi for protection of the City's existing storm drain system to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. )'?PROVED ANIR ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1987. PLANNING.COMMISSION 'OE THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. Davia Barker, Chairipan ATTEST: ra fir, Deputy Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning: Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Piannir«--"---Assion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plann�g�.ommissi'on held. on the 28th day of January,. 1987, by the following mote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS:: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: I M-C.r Qf .�.... �L ji Ci NY •!.O���5`l ��,L.aq� ��� -,�1�Y✓y N- I.��y �Y,�E`EN 4�. tilt � 56`'xwgi' YOOl u `� a.^'j, -.. � �...• � �.,�� ens. !sue �d�i� y� �a•w w. a�d�",S{oawi. gar ,lu �.n � r•,e,. lair MIT �� � y����i ��r� N�'c a'QY�d�"•�"t�`�'`o Xlw+`'' Y { Ua,,;, �' a, O g=. ws�a�it,A., N V..yfCn wC`0. Ny Y �f4x 6�Ct1il Y. r I " �1 14. '�q` i m ,1 s ?, 't Opp � LY pN Y4C e p W Y Cg r L ��4wNy' w,,CC� YJ:. p a g�g� r cult 171 tWw Y--. ooc r.a gg mo.CpNapC Nta tla�+' ag.0 r� ai.�aJ .zb,c l Cy�� C&..�.. aaL'.T�a[>•.0�. .Furp CGggGtl�N.a y<p E ��'qM ay'0 p� 4LM6. N vFiLs~ aWy �wvi�g»00.5. �E9 L 'VF6. L F,Cy{i BOG w-A u ai u'p6� �.Q.v'ii.•► � ~.r3���+v"��' �iaoy,�°€v,�a. �.'+f� �' bk�o- �� Syp• y•f�. L�UdIM .- r J QWotl �� O,. I�Q LW•p�: d a-J R..».Y a� ^ypF LYy 4LLiYYpY� � a»aM�,y aN� NNp pQYwd C „>„ m�cpiY,04O4P G C2 y. Sq 'p `g4lu ,QCw9a e� A'. N'g�.. 'W qbM c C MaU mp �33 pnn' bP .Gy +�p�i[ O O g Ua � �iV^. Nc .c+ Q G » V.i ' p Gq e�'{D n„r� 'b� tip.•♦a9 yi p_F`C ({CsY�.L• A ��m..ipt 4.�WU� YO�Cw1CY pffi y�aQ+:�S{^^ryb.' F� e�4=�N .�y�Q� . r� , �N l+�� 4. d O7Y.LY Ntl Maw r. r' q� rN SC � N '�iyQ ♦:tl~ ��rw s�i oau4. .+{'yyyyyy �1c w S SOW 4E�c5q".a.`. pay,:AT nrV C{r� LYLM , etl� L�YJ4'V�ul-`yQy-- ' `-9¢4}.Qy4 LC�L yYu:M=®M tE �DEr O.RF i]C iSYVC b.�H Nbb.S�M6V T O,''bp C.wO. 4QV y�p9 j F r _ cod a 24. V4 «g: A.y i ry F ar i. N C r L G W bC ob. �' SMS aa� e'r $A oL ua �cr '• rtl�a,$ � :c LLi—Lco ��e+ Mu u° p. p�' u •V H gg + M H bM -ei. nWal' a yv ®rn <FaaN eeu—m rq u°N .223 rp� S^r• a � n„. as �Y•'(� Q'Y'4 ce Yl .cd� QLLL rn v9su_.�Q . Q�S v600...C+� C $u ag a.'ts�Y.. dt r�-rWM t.0 L L,N N. +f'tlrn L_Sli. ~G r r` L C3:uC 2,;e dCM CC G.-p. N Z,L V M Gg W ii y ,�. n gNE L..•'�6a N�C C9 ^qQ. M1S r0 3N. yL1CNyZ al -rpm FSb. p bNrl' uY q=J aQLr Fw KuccU.0 L�SC�CY �pr»••�^., U»6V aA N �i. Cd E.• D m`w lvFl Cu p� N! F Mq P YO 4.�un16 { ^ d m '¢ moo' aosS w.»vc a o b� yy�i mod. �i n i a4 ar 4 p C m n r u L&V E M O tl Q 4 a A V m L µ V V G'�a?` + �j 6 T L f.L y GUf p WL»3 L.+-yn ~p UUYqq@c .+^ �.1�ayU.f f.4C 0dl n�VM- U y�..aa �«'Q 6.G:�vb W. ruIA Z. ��6•/Lb A s.G1 L . }. ,1 1 - 1 �l ti O C p y •^tl: C Q a o 4 W.;�N V a Y G N.wC« 0. L 6 L:. I O b qY Rs{ q OOO G.V Y 7~b�+ 4r` C.Y 6- q w: W L �O RY �dr_GR r�bw� .4 � L L V.9. Qy S 1M. VYOIp RY S»u 0� �r4L4y A b-�b Y'L �• � bt6l KIND' �N O J W��A: p Y_�Z .C.N y�a NV L 4dR::•i'L VIyY,� Y LIoRONfA�YN Gy Y..CC N+ CO�R.. »�ZAe �'•=Q to, x NK AyY oa4 UT^y 0^dd¢leq;Y C .'Cq 'd R:. Y^6ttt■Cyyy ..0.'t CL q+�w C� �� •+N:.� V ¢.ppN»p01Ywrny: �'.9p'4yy« AN .i,fo ' Obfr.O' 1�S ~ Ca Ly 'rWFtiYf. .NC6wgJ' gC i zs . �9 ■ LCC � 1Z.Li.LV� L b S-n ;a L Cr Ya� hN `ON .N Y,d irtl.r.rA4 L.S SN +► » 1 Mvlp ,$moo o sKYL:�o Yew» a,Y #f. QE.,'r'QA S�vr. 46°1Uy oc �..nN AWyy L. t3.�A LC N'IL I.Lt'N C` aTrf�tJ ZIA AW..a C-YSy¢a U:y .. GW Maw. `T.,c 49�TUiiU0<C�4o; 3-4 TN Ryy R 6m--'I G ?� NOO yeC d gciu� to d. .'.Ina-n gg 7�S cr Ndy L Era . .tb YJ•{'Y ., b mr�` �Y ... �a tYi aic g� a9' CC v tt R\ 'f'w VG t tiy.C�4M y^ w 'r abi 6d� D pp s 9 Iy pp C L YN O^N � py0 _ dGqC�ee a S{l{�y� a 6 L'C t N' Y N ^!� 00•Y t4 pf.G.= LYR. Ot l.� ~ AD�. <UX ^ 41w YOy tjN gOat... d� =yN TAN bL.y:.. M: SG N qY. .21111. Oy�,,� O? C 4aC �0. ^_ G N +eYe y V' r`�t bC r q '+y L C.. Q ME y,.Y�Opl `UfO. L•}'•U ' y0 Y YA NY p.o. C� o��» awf51.N 4K'CM �'N YY Y A ^C WE CyL_eC.. CB(�. YY LRNOOL ~.al: q�R Y..S M~ O yC w :.Y iI O O Y C >Z 6 3�:. Y]r.A t b� ��Y ulY=. �' 4 AC. ryN p wb. y�GL yL' ".Ci�O. q.0 R T^G6... 4 Yam' ASL�. Sal CLR^r,S'. Gp0.OY,s'�9N �q.Q. Y Sf lt: Cy¢yO„O w�• =��tt, N y�(�.y.0 y O Y WWL CC � L... O Cwary �.N 4 _ R y N �s n' 'c"°' •� oec. way '4o orb i uY"'Wy g giswMgrQ`L c k- aSYOQ.`OG 21= c Ya F N•L f il.•'ta� q CSY4 ' A.0 y+..,� `Y�`• �w N 1. L O O A • CV N�r•.L 'b vf. F o�'. w'.1Yy tuf N»a}i �-L'q U.•A'Y tU. r, C r.1 � Co ~�6 w1�p 0. .C �. O R �L C61 Y YL.0 TOO Gy wO <R @,W � 6bN. MO.» Kti tb' .1�6w� O C 4 W0.G IIIM W. '� W h w N I.f C IO W V N ^ N _ 4rf M 4 1 ` ti t t x F' � r t b L� Nh Jyyn !1r CCh"C9 '' ar�VCC lTr� UO L UL Y01 rOp r3C Ou1/DI Y. ewe: "un aa'vi syG � dab -PE -Fy Cgec � tv d VayG Q�U4 left V�p U��, yt3}.+� q;y... tU� O.V� cT.N 4.Y aaaY'q Y ♦K 4..N .� L.rr.L rq`D Y �� rCF„J pg ya�L yy CNy CR q� o0 .:. TU,C O L W(Ci JY. VO:'90YD CV1n Y� 4Nb1A .y r.. G h u is : cyyppa. �N 'tl a' yy� C�' oario -• �:� Z L ��p. �LOtlL. �\ � Y)gg bU SL`.u`VCC V L ,IQQH U'i u C■g S T:G♦�CC6 LPL IfR R �b � L Y w.t- Q.. W a HOCC eO�Hy yar 5fjq MM O 90R. S YY L.M I bAY ,9 CQi _y r VO D �Y:UCi� LOa VOK Cam` t C.N Cud y AY L Y ,V^ V. 5U y4 V.: NTL .. �Lfi.Os Y*N F v.L�J 04'N~ O`JGJ AY aV :4;6Sjq N uL 2 �' Sn..^t� ty� N L�a�+ V al • a]Y.. C LL. tiCQ„ Y_ TOY q Y N E-- SI,bf»,..y yoy//a�yy aura r-7 F`.i.6M 3 4 1Y14 HN t 9 l..UWi V AL OMM J 69 'a4 wbnr Yt �Q y LN y :OU aNG ya L Y I. 8. s�p�� 'pNFOyta.: cm 3 L�0, 9OI« D'af �.qd rRyG H .9aM Cy ■f..h WILY„ �} qC■ O [LC CG 6ACn Y ® Y CIN Lw» M C - �L CL y9 LA Ar. yN$; YL Go Yr LC L ^ 5 LLdG L b L~ yy r 3y H b +� O. N.O t -- �C G.0 „M„'W. N Y O N+: a G.I- sin A NM br C. NyL� L {'L R. .O d Y-♦. b b y b al 6 Y b 0 Z M. --W Z C. a ah} YO O. urq LL 6VQ N DkL.~h �` VODQIG LV Z?C Q,N=�. ® qP E= dALa � II� Ob W C L L u«• CV GL CI,� M MOB.n4 N� COI�a L ON:.S LOYN: o }L� LCM YL.�U I.-NA ua. NN •.� Sa+L• Hal 77 emu.,. �: fa t o b SYQ' G ! y �5�� 4 F �4y 9�i.`J��•i 4 3 •'^�2,, II'�� �q+ 'II'�•—Y Q•,��. M r"�� {y`� �Y y0 N��v.a� M •�e S C tlj�aa 4.`A"�. �'+ M W A �gp O.N q� ". t �. II•. R�4- IT :. Np��Y� Chi'. y i.. ; p K.w qaP ► .. +i, 1= '� _`� i�QyO►,.^ �w w.. •y q� u � ACC 4 ao 23eRZ aa' � I S 5 2 l -Y ► fie-. x 1 qN$ f,E$ Y cry ;Fe �• T ,[`�,• a• c� � � }., � �!� • a � a §R d '� � 'fit C �'� a aT$r l �.». .. "`� Y,`. c gg yy ski"�. e 3 'c+Ya oc T 2c3 Qn '' '8$ { 7�611 M. arse" G� i �w. CW « y6 A .■ V.�p�R. ` 1:Y T�►yam` _ vN oNN m■■ a pweGG Y :w d •y G ^.:,w�i Y��e. mq�`.C.4 uIL '' o• ti'c .'¢.Q'" '', ,Lae Yu.a g. e`i�q,A .•. � • S�� NNt� av «6 YC� ate. r 4�. V b4 aQ ►as"w� Y "Yo� uVow.�.n�a.. a�d .o.L%t •.cn s �s'p"�r6 .'ay .•ca`,, ! »w k s'o• �$o$�•�g2 `` s 4€•��na,1, g 4 •w� �,_� c „a $ Q� c LSog a e pSy` $Eay.$ ^'< o'er■ V•v�a.. dye. L e �ro `■` MG�►Y•C. •pp V .CWC 4f�0„1d4 9aC N• ZQ.w 00 � `•�i.. II� VVp.� �t 6.2 aGGYppff.TB 4Li.O �uq��1Nt C MSC LN ° Na Y G.i ? lE�N R c!e VO'N:f.,z W M4-1�Y W+,(�'S +�.Y.e.rM...r• G'ql V i�A � 1 i 13 j L,?Op O aVyYa:•,O'�3 O Y �Gn.�.O.. C �.. Q C M N �.r _ [Yi 2a4 W ► 6 � D C c M r C q G O �GQ`y >C. �jA�. ` �Y..�6 .�N...' g --0 O Oyg3 •g ay. 9 6r is YYy`R 7S ' .1";w Y .l a. •-'P �a C y�.y ll Y~ Ed t i �<.. n���aY � 3. au.R :�. v6dr yp4 t.'r «` ,LY@ «., R wua ,..prey =g .. �`q S+•}a� u Qy= 9 C`..� LtCi� ^ „aTu�i pQ ^1 pi •� Q_ ` y`pyp,4&I R ;OS 6K 0 a�g^ u'p : `yam d - •�Y..Y �.I. MN*`YEN QN i.i �6 �. ,, Ed YAM 4Ylit ILA I �qqg\i� Y OzgL i 6 y.rpp Y�. pyya �C !E� Y� 4. � a C� OV �45 ��;'� •• �� �� ms;4n S„'L .�r1 ya i�i, :� Msu ® ...0•N ."Q�a.. nC - Msg�e.. Ya aye li J2G y; p•p^ �4Rtb( q 5 ~ &2 N .�. 'G` y V Y4Pt�.• VN My �MW i e+Y.eM4 yy �b g` � �� N.' y��� 'dYq' ;u � � /•4 III - j a Z Y' O .2 zJ N As gi `L • /a qc O.�u N ''[.. $.. ei.. P` .may jl yy� a+•`. Q « K� � • tt gg YO. Y 65 NM V YieQ O�{M �gYY s` w�HNC1W■y MQ My t YY ��. N {�{W M�� YnC 'Yg N�OC.. YH� p ? ��+•pC t`bt Cp, ��« ` Y �1� „Vi 6 y Y Z \y`V 6NY N6W 90 �4W m q • N 1.1 �Y. w I. ��. M- � J a L a y'tt 3 i r r` ' yp .• YY NYq � _ � OS SOai c $. Y O G.� dON 9 Qq 7�OA YUy Y� I U ^y Yy. S♦p.i.Y p -i4�.�i. MYS 3 0.0 SsC N.q O 'O ry.� ^� i a 2 -p Q, n y L `Y.♦p 'Y_• _4 a-6 a G r a C t M�piR,N W L 1 �.pn O �4 Yp Q1• ��<i C�C� � r�_� �Y N� G• i..l C4 Cp 741 9 m I p 4 ♦N Y N g m l Lf 9 9 . O N 4;0 tl_4 4 2.6 .1y` Y i qa O .p o ■VNy c t tl �y p BLS. c84 =pi�tl Co.� tl�Z Od.UG "iQ4i ,F a A 6u; d c� 96 (i 4 Gill �i3�:1�['av,'.14:HO V j •� � UCAMQNGA c��p STAFF FORT •� r. �. 01 1977 DATE: Januany,, 28, 1987 .? TO:. chairman-en&Nembers of the Planniing Commistfon FROM: Brad Btf1`7er,.Citx P(Inner,. BY: Dan�Cotemin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: FIJ,11kri TAGltI:E.AND}BAIT.STORE'WITHIN�WBAREA 4 0 3 I. ABSTRACT: The attached,lletter from Mr. Arthur Lug ch requests the .opportunity to; di^scuss'with the Plannfng Commi4ssi7J— . 1itho likelihood of receiving l approval of a Conditional` Uses PermitOe&asl for a.f�ishing tatkie and bait store a,t 9203 Archiba'' Ave the property is located within Subarea 4 of the.Cf•ty's. Industrial Specific. Plan which is 1, designated for General, Industrial uses. \t Il. ANALYSIS: According to the applicant, the primary use would be the custom manufacturing of fishing ro;!� and reels. In conjunction with the primary use, Mr. Luboch proposes retail sales of "terminal fishing y tackle and ba1t," and =pokrts for reels and'-components for rods" which would not be manufactured on the premises. This type of x sales activ fy`would be class3Fied as retail and require a Conditional Use Permit under the land; use type definitions for Light Wholesale Storage and Distribution within Subarea 4. In addition, Mr. Luboch proposes to conduct seminars for beginning fisherman. This activity would be considered information and. instruction of a personal nature and would be classified as a Personal :Service. A Personal Service use also requires review and approval of a Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission within Subarea 4. ITEM N :.STARE t �� ,• ��� '�f� �'� �. V, f,, ro )� 7.rX :'it'v YJM'h 4lafi :4 Staff Yi ,' exp ' rye` ©n Mill �)se a it�`��acess r�tai r, E.ubazch �rPp� o ng`° t �i�c` o� bed ids c n ,.s a p�^t]i t�iPn`ay i r as th ,'Pt ar�ni ng Css� regar i .. a pro pesed pus10 Res lly �a Buj ;ewt _> /C'Vty Ell le w BB:DC•te 4' ;a i r� M �� 4 o Arthur Lu 6 h- 0 7615 Hyssop r Dr. Rancho Cacamonga,I,,C' V / ~ January 8, 1987 Rancho Cucamonga Plannlnsg;Gomrii ssion:. Dear Sirs-, ti� y I `<Lfe and T are Mr- ttin'g thi= I,ett.e.r' to e�mlaan why, we would like t6�, �en a: fis' g taeT a stray e a 903 Arci; baldve. in subarea 4. Ve have mtensive -y gone 3* the "T'abli Lr-- Lam&Use Tyne Definitions that roerta�r to this add2ess, and wa &e that our business meets the sfat:ed, reauYrmefts wi bh t� exception o,,fr retail sales,. The follo:v:ng is a r It el' the servicez we %r ll be-orov deng. 1. Manufactruing.of custom fishing rods 17hich will be, assembled on the -aremlees. . 2. Mrinufacturimg of a0 custom prodmict called reel.("l amt-s whisk we trip- .sole distributor of wholesa3e to:• ether tackle; stores and:would also be sold retail at our; store. 3. We will be an information center for chavt�. '1ishin-g trips, Me�dcan fishing wrist ions,, fish and- game r es aAd regulajloas, b,. maps of xLshina areas in Southern-Callfsrnia:, and also--cnP formation on hot^ to catch fish and where, to catcY=nar`ticul.ar types of fish. -. ':'e 51an to Drovde seminars for begining fishermen of both freshwater and saltwater fishing free of charge. We will provide servicing of rods and reels and t:ilA also sell the parts for reels. al'd components for rods wholesale and d ail. 6. to would sell terminal fishing tackle and befit. 1 Yfe have chosen the above location because it will be con- venient for fisherman who will be fishing at the Cucamonga Guasti Regional Park. This location will allow children riding bicycles to the nark to purchase their bait at a convenient and safe lc'�ation. RF f'll '` .> :e o ,y ser er vre van to pravatde that *e vauid needs e am ut�roya`_l far`at t.,, ? o , yo3 the reetalaip roY= e�Cdor�dbs udeseni Tale iii ° aou e a bution ire can s IIe i onr , * .We feet that � rim"the manu' ac ur g and spec'a se c nro rtae ht lO �on ?Z bed be of Ranoho 1.Cucamngaandto the b sxnea�srntna w a' tao� .,e cho ; CUT camo gta areal e rreu r k �WE at this 3oca� oxi �vnh h''e` x ` sales. ,, use a z�rQua7Ao �Ssnoee , F^. Q:, Arthur utbcjch�� 1 p I I r 0- .o a E Ek CIRCt1LATIQN 1Q0-R.C.W. Sth Sol:oe lass,R.O.W. n ; i, eitb - 1 I111i RAIL SERVICE - rF'F-F�;, Ex4titg �' ...... proposed � Ti7AtLS1Rf)I)TES , 0000 Pedestrian 0000 Bkyels � � OC:jr- R= oar Special StramhcaW r Landucaping Power L1na/ utility Easement Ace ass Points r SUbWaa' iE +a 4th Mots: Parcel tines and tot cantiyfsatt®m, are shown as a ppraximat,on only. 1 � IV-32 TABU 01-1 SUMMARY OF LAND USE TYPE BY SUSaREA e PFRMITTEb USE + CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE ROTE "Oft-markgd Uses Not Permitted USE TYPES Land is♦s 1P GI GI GI GI G1 iP IP GI u M G Subs I GI tP GI GI HI.tR iP reas HO t 2 3 d .i 6 '. m t0 tt t2 73 7d l6 16't7 AtyfUFACTlJRtrYG ,_. _ .; Custom - Light • 4' ° • a- w ® a ; Medium Heavy + t` .} e f i ant Hss ° 01FTi E F F,71,151A rra Mid &RE RC R�ecetnlatraUve� time � Protesatbntitlina=s\ +. {. } m ° +Deatgtt Sery Aeaearelt sehrieea ♦ .e i a s s + } • WIIJ}LE$►LE ST RAGE ii 0ISTMRl ltlQti ` ° }Light • w ° w e ♦ ° ♦ ° a • ¢ ° Iit�dhaa ♦ + + w w � Heavy c + o ®, i ♦ aC s COAitiiERCIAL ♦ t a Ar,.itpal Akrla CaatlMwol ry "s servbwA ® w Can ♦ w o Aatoaretlre Pleat stora" + + } Automotive Rental/Leasing Aviomadve/LWO Truck� ♦ °i • t + + • } ,d+ + AutomctIVQ/Truck Repak-me or i ° �' ° • e - Automotlw;sati•s Autwnotffrs Serviow Station + + Y + `� a4 CatltratOP'f Ottfait AE Yards {mSu.�lttdiirts;Contracto's Storar- YardBuilding • tt Business YgliawA3s Fssasatas a # + $ ° } e o o a t: ti+nk—Support S*rvtc+s a s s w : ° • + s -• w C cation servio♦a + • 'e {+ • a • } + ♦ i ♦ e Camrenisdce Satre&Ser',tcss : • ♦ s • �[. + c ,} Eaikag A iXNkina.Fatt>tpip $ + # +F # •�; + t } + + + + } + } Entertainment ♦ e 0. s ♦ + _ e w Exftaml"Impact Cal . + } + + + + + + + Fast Food'Sate* + # # V + + ♦ } ¢ �. ,lnaraner.it.Rsa Estate $ {+ Food&Saverag+Satee Sarvkes ° ° 1 ♦ '$+ { • :• • W Laundry Services a w is Care S+rvice w - • ° • • Personal Services ° + 'a' # Roass wacWtiea Patrolman + + + + + + + + } R"*services + + + $,+ + + + ♦ + fi • + w w e _scrsn.0aaratlnrn�_ + � • • _ r ♦ er!w „� CrVI + Admk�atrtdve CIv10 S+rv►owe Cultural ® °, • ® w a? w w -FUM Safety Utility&ervicer + $ + 41. M 'tP-indv n A Park GI-Generst industrial Hq-Haves vK.overlay District MUH1-Minimunt lmpsct;Heavy industrtat HI-Heavy lndu$trtat III-6 r+ i ��,�.._. � .;� }a, '�-•�- ij '� "�l ,ram. �:�, -,�»�'^a� e LAND USE TYPE DEfIN,I, T1NS Uses shc�m in Table ZSi-1 are defined failorts. , A. FAG00% USE TipES <, Custom W44aAturIA01 A iv4 iEs� tXp;za11y.; ncluda,. C� oak ,t�anufac Hi -,,: roces f C assdmFslritrg� packafitg,3 treatment o� fabca ,3pnaf° CUstoi! �mdr rodUCt 5' S@ S� (S3neS5 ' s, s <b not uiliixerard wttr'i'a ar thez,r, a '` .k finishes ARK, #7 W ¢ i'K ffniser!` , A tr t sad ac M m�iteriarl costar mroder= '.ire fnf s *strut s. `', ' is are rady carsr�irl''asstfar 'andYacude orf-sib � . ret'aof gads;�pra�e i Stich^u � �s� but erg rlat #minted art oblects�i #? Aye Tf� ts apparel Ind, 1�1; fsical,, electrical or; a icy, �,iatiatara►, -,,� `; reiat�ii prodr�t� i�gni and advertis.ine� ��p� ` 4USITMO glace jyrtt� `Pf'odsht aFsd asset' i' - of bitycla f 'ts. theys d not produce. E nofise, vibration, or pasrtsrl'atesahici old aifversely` afi�ect uses -n the same, s tore or La saw side, Where 24 hour on-site sn�fli°ance is -necessary, a caretaker` residence'say be permitted when approved by a Conditional Ilse Permit. f Light Manufacturtnys> Activities icall i.r�lu not labor intensiven far_Ut assembly, fabrication or rcpalr processes s�lr ch`off not -involve large,�arrtatner truck traffic-or the transport of lame scale !sulky products, but io �nclude.l msited ,rail traffic. The near, pit mmy be fin#shed`in the sense that it is ready for use or conception or iX my be S"d-finished to` become a coipo+rent for fifther• assembly and packaging« these W.ts of business establishmwts art customarily directed to the i vMlesale market, interplant transfer :rather than the direct sale to the corm r. such uses mar inclu4p but are not limited to: electronic ai`croehtp sass embidr; printing, publishing and allied industries, cane,aisd other confectionery products; both,, �ifneQ soft drinks, and car°�4onated' garter; appaCee�} d"ishei prn wft; paaper' Curd cdntai drugs- small fabricated astral prom � � tools, general: hardware. .arctri tectr.•raG>�wind orreae,, � smetal 'tea toys, amusement, sporsy, athlet1 , vibratto;v.(hazardousewa to nmateot rial) or par rte 7�TfQ IV-1 s rt s' ^v,, 4 xigv•, n G. WHO!'ESAE;<;STORA6E«�iQ DT RIBTJaT��N�US 7Y, yt; S'ubilc Sege Aclkivites� nrit�deriiTi % t "iiiise :. role aTi.irs Yf 1. T leiseaet ,i rat efik T'as #i a rcex ,prfM�ly 1'Yzat %' �eti�i r� �,thMap�e �o�rarat aiw xo ° �;W 1�c155 . $G7#m�LdICs 'tS '4� Or � '� ,l""eSsal,e ,�Sia�a e,?:Rdo DiilSitr�i�6ufa'�o� 1} .i'Yi�ties p��, ,mot yY �rrr � na ,�I i�,edt tot saiingt, tnage, ia ousn s erticesnif�� sti`ara�ge iaha os3tit'?ttir tata'Mic S' the rt�ailse a.: fiintetsed° and f000l Tsraducts� fii+Q�s a ." this clas4EPIcaiiaie shill ! ctz� .*enclosed i wu5E1c(iCtg3k �octtapt' 50,OOQcr�e Meet{ � �Tes�s� ` bufsT:di r Ret [� ales Erota tie resni?ses� Mrove t i i �i tt c scary s � 4 ' occurn any" ` t•�rs on s _ ! �caretaeri,s; residerY;e oe%itted` when a'pprovi � 1by, a Condfitio� i�.Os��Qe�wfit< I i J� . lyedfusa `� esalie ��ooca .and fairs.Lribtctiat ktivi'ties ca 1 � area ro , , +rhoTesa, e, „ o sz arf t�s+ iwtsi�, servfcestor , �mevittg�and"s�opage' ; scy7rices,> stawagg.and�f?a'iesai"i!ng to r*tai�,lrersr�am'tbe precis . Of #3sti,5h"` goads and food' prockicts wdT distrifuuti'&t f4i).ties far large scaii'netaz''i`. ftr,;es.O ktixitfes una l this classiffcalftw shall Ile conducted is eTosed hPuildings znd: occupy Win° than 50,0lm square feet of hulTdfng space, 2nclae►ad are reutti text or spteeelative tfuildings with oyq° a r �onquir feet of warehouse to su"Sillaw* is neeIssary, a caretak 4s residtnea may be permitted%ben approved by, a Con Use Permiit. 1 tieavlt tihalesate/ Storage and Oise; ��tton. Activities �ypicarly 1ncIvde --Tuff e i ��"-limited to: .� warehousing, staraae, freigfet handling,, shipping, trucictng services' and terminals; storage and wholesaling from the premises of. unfitni:shed, raw, or semi-refined products requi, i further processfng fabrication or manufacturing. ypi.cail$y=zt6s� intlud'e but are not limited to, iru Ang fir*si. autwotfive storage or Upound yards,. and. the v�olresaf "ng of metaTi, Wnerals and agnccuT -ur37 proddu ts, : Ot4tdoor storage is: pemitted, MiherR 24 :ours an irate surveillance is necessary, a caretaker`i resd'dence may: r be petaitted when approved by a CondiFtio#ia�t i?ne l'ersiit: i2 — Medical/Heal th,,Care Services, AttivA.t. es typr, f nc.ti�e, ,ate na �iaited joif thecrapput,�„ preventative. =,or correct"r personal[,,, treafifi !nt,. by " h p. ' Aist,c$Ads, �aentists, and'Sir, prIctiptioners� as we�i i„ . as tie pray, ion �of ftdical', test �g' t inalysi's sgrvi xs.,. •H?dIth„_d1r�e _uses typically, inclaud° those ¢ .xoraied byz 6 r"` �' � • iiedicas.irlinlcs " Family Planni�rg,CiiFnicr - Ig YPattent i h Care,44c11Ities, ircimding hot;,,fitols and cca►valescerrt laws. Perso_ft Slices• Activities typically includes but are .ego mi e�"tir: ids o 1�an, in9tr cti�n and; siRi far Services of a perscax�A3 r+ature. Uses,typical ly ' #ttcluda' ut are test lie ted td; co3piter � ai�a ng, an vi ' chaols, dAy"Ca�r�ac.iliti@s, travel h�ia eius, , � R L'ograpby stud_io,5: , �. uetr o Euar P ducts Story e: Activities ,typically $1 ��",.¢. u are nc�t e� .o: bu?� storage. sale,, dm. Uftteibution of gasplffie, liqutfie&petroleum..gas, and other,petroleum' woducts. Recra'aiional Facilities kiivitics typically inciud 1iuf.-are 'no t•rr� , I sports. 11 p performed eit 1 indoors or autOdOrs which require a facility fo , conducting the res:reati vial activity. Uses tyrpically :fir include; -but,J are not limited to: health, c3 ,,.-;,��� exwr_isk&,studios or c'asses, swinni ers, skatin rlbs� cent g!r rii�ics, b�tarlrcg alleys, tennis courts, sports fields, \\ and golf courses. Re air Services: Acitivit.�' typically include, but are no m t 1Q repair serv,44;s involving articles such As upholstery, furniture; and ;`fie electrical appliance repair services, Scrag. eratl.onr Activities typically include, but era no m o the storage; acid Saida from the premises and/or dismantling of used, iacyclable, or waste materials . tiexcept when such activities are part of .a manufactu:•ing operaon. .f . 1P III-17 F J p ti 7 7Ti - CITY OF RANCHO CFTC^,,AMONGA STAFF EPUMT 0 'O Z 5 MATE: January 28, I987, TO: Chairman aql Members of the Planning Commission l: Brad Butlei�;�City Planner. BY: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner SUBJECT- AWARDS F(R DESIM, EXCELLENCE I. PR13GRM UPDATE: For the past nine, years, the Planning Cosrni'ssfon - of e City WIRancho Cucamonga hTs been prospering an encouraq!��--, ;t resourceful land.use aLnd state of the art dev!:lopnent. ,, In ordit to recognize.outstsnding contributions by_deveyopers to `0e City of Rancho Cucamonga, an a.anual ,awards program has been developed.. The ' awards will be a combinatiom of a,:selection process wkich is designed to identify and oublicly acknowledge 'the development cof4wnity's contribution to rancho Cucamonga. Contributions which Il not only meet curreat needs but exceed them - projects.;worthy of emulation. ET The Ranchr; Cucamonga Awards for Design Excellence program will hohga' those projects that demonstrate* design excellence, ` innovaiive ofi l resourceful use of land. . In order to reflect the }, diversity of development activity, awards i will be giv� `--yin the categories of residen*s al/commercial/office, and industrial. ' Awards i.w be given fora variety of different types of projects, ! siich as, new construction, master planning, remodeling and landscaping. The Rancho CUCaMonqa-r Planning Commission will serve as t;ie jury to ,select 1,1te Awards .fdr Design Excellence recipients. To date, 24 nominations have `�'Ibeen received from developers and design 1 professionals. In addition, staff will be submitting nominations for other protects that staff feels are also worthy of sons!'derr,V Due to the large number of nominations> to be considered,. staff feels that ,a subcommittee process would be the most effective in reviewing all nominations. The subcommittee could work ,%ith staff to establish a format and schedule to review the nominations, _The , subcommittee would 'prepare a final list for the full Comtaisson to consider of those. nominees which most clearly align with the program goals_ ITER 0 r ro �r- .,`r#..�.- S�FOR EESEE EXCtil.l.ENOE (� FF. RE QPlCI€ORFTDFf 4+ Sta� f recosersds tha; thex.P]annting Cosslan ap®o i �a s �o i w,ii st f�tc b fist��a I.", n. sete��tion rssh d to,pr en.- a fin T Y of nbmilnees W-fie, fut� plannn o- itssgn iaar flit° cnsi`ir EiyQro. ya Re Tly subs s ` But 1 ° 1 City plea BB•DCcvc 'r , r _ f a i ---------- RAM CUCAM M6A AWARDS Mt DESAM FXCECCERCE l c tr 314E P(MSE The purpose of this Awards Program is to recognize and create a public�f; awareness of the contributions that local residents- local merchants, and Professional builders have made to the character```�t the City of Rancho% Cucamonga by honoring those projects that demonstrate design excellence and the innovative and resourceful use of rand. E CRITERIlI _ Partttripatioij is open to anyone associated with the projects Providing the following criteria are met; The project must be looted within the City of Rancho ! Cucamonga. * The prt' ect must have been completed during the previous Year, except during the first year awards are given any project built since the City,s incorporation shall be considered eligible. * Projects must demonstrate excellence in design and impteM—Ont the goals and policiea .of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In making the awards` the Juryra consider examples of exceptionjO intlflve%"aari cooperation between the aim achieving ,design excellencerivate and public sectors in hEBIBILIT1' The Rancho Cucamonga Awards for De Excellence are made to business. In order to reflect the diversity, of deve eth Design " awards are given each'year in t lopment activity, he 'following categories: residential, commerciai/office, and industrial. Within each category, awards may be given for a variety of projects such as new construction, master planning, remodeling_and landscaping. Any resident, local merchant, or professional builder may submit nominations to the City Planner. The City Planner may also submit nominations for consideration. Please note that projects previously considered cannot be resubmitted. THE JURY The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission shall serve as the Rancho Cucamonga Awards for Design Excellence Jury. The City Planner will submit the list of nominations to the'Jury for consideration together with background material on the project as well as a photograph and Site plan for review by the Jury. The jury may select finalists for further consider,ition. 0-3 t10 77 CITY'OF RANGIQ CIICAMONGA ��rn2o C MEMORANDA 4t / r k U� �� t DATE. danuary 28 _ 1987 i917 TO: Cha:i;rmaq, and Members of the Planniny'Capxnission FROM., Ottn.l{iiautil, Sen.i!or Planner SUBJECT, SAN SEVAINEIETIWAWA PLANNING AREA VQR ,b P This .item has .been referred: to thk Commission I �s"iie Desire`Review` ,3 Committee. It is,,requested tfrzt the CormfssiOn schedule a workshop- in v the near future far full Commission review and palicy. .direction to, staff and applicant. At issue is thtj\,,questian of open]Space regtdfrements in the,Eti.wan�a Specific Flan area,, The°pl'ad calls fa perc nt open space and other finenities in exchabjge for densitie i %the 4�per end of the density", ?tinge in each eategary. The atta Eh d rep�;,�t to the Design Review R, Committee explains the issues in grea ` detaA. Attachment: January 22 1987 Design Review Committee Co„9sients , f, 1 ITEM.P —:CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMoNGA1977 El 'GRANDUM DATE:,), ;'January g$ 1967 TO: DESIGNi REI�E 10C COMI:TTEEA SIDENTItAL TE ARb FRONT: otta�Kroutfil. 'Serilior'Plranner SUBJECT: CONGEPTUP+t. DI«SGIlSSZi)}p/Wb3C,!#TIAL R�SIOENTY .. PNQl€CST IN . ETiVANDA, {�Sotl!� $IUE OF SI fTT, VEST OF SAN `S§MNE j CREEK) - D"_OK10 0BJECTIVE Prior to formal submittal, the developer is seeking initial feedback from the. Gomittee gn-the concept.. Since this 's a ors af`Tts y„ ern ` Etiwanda, staff aitsol needs iieesign direction, '4 B'ACKGROUND• This project is located in the only_ area in the north part of Etiwsnda" designated "Low% 2-4 dwelling units per acre. According to the l( Etiwanda Plan, the developer has two nptfoass: { 1. Develap under.' Basic Standards. `This would. rm permit a conven .,ona, su v s an a single' family lots, lo,oDo sq. ft. mininisum, 15,000 sq. ft. average. Limited amenities and,no on-site windrows or open space would be required. Gvera V density would result. in about 2, un!jts/acre plus. r 2. Develop under optional Standards.�'! This would permit a r density of UP to-Adwelling units, per acre,, with no specified minimum lot size. Rowever, substantial on-site amenities would be required to offset the impact of additional density. Specifically, the 'Etuwanda Plan calls for: o. 30% of site area to be in "common, visually accessible" open space. o On-site windrows (;50 ft/ac) ' o Greenway connection(s) o Front yard/street side landscaping R „ - yp T m. '- , TIP", �.. I ,0 Design-Review Committee/Residential Team Panrry 9,.1987 ?� 9eua I r,';i } The Optional Standards.normally Imply a Homeowners. Association and a housing type, other. than, conventional, single ''family i, detached unit,. yo�wever, an associations not required i'f other means of commm area maintenance is provided., PROPOSED PROJECT: The applicant intenda, to develop under the Optional Standards at a density of 3.6 dwellAngs',:r acre:. Tha7,pro$ect would consist of center plot single family;hwie,s,on lots. of B4Od - 10,000`sq. ft. What makes Wa project different from other concepts is that the lots, are extra deep; allowing: o Beep front yarn setbacks (27 to 62 feet, 35 foot average minimuu). o Extra wide landscaped streetscape (,86,.to 156 fee: etweenF„ fronts.of homes see hibit 2). o Extra wide separations between the rear sides of homes (104 to 174 feet). o A paseo system connecting the back of each lot and cul- de-sacs. The'fencing along the paseos would be at least partially open. Staff's initial reaction to this concept was that the project appeared too rigid. However, therti are some excellent features incorporated ipto the design. The east. and west boundaries of the site are lined with mature olive and Eucalyptus windrows, respectively, and the rectangulal* peseo system with windrows does perpetuate tits "outdoor room" character so prevalent in Ettwanda. In addition, the peripheral streets feature' wide parkways in an attempt to provide a rural and open feeling, especially along Upper SuAnit. Among the negative aspects are lot widths (541) and relatively narrow side yards, and concern witheffective maintenance of paseos without_a Homeowner's Association. AN DL PJ 'tea to [ srag iPC to ttee/Resfdenfi,iai Co mittee FEEDBACK REQUEtTT . There are numerausues athat cou ;d "be ;discussed. ;However, the essential .qqe'st Ons a `n ted�h lawn '' i; L r -- I) 1. Is it, alb to kg_tan open^ spaceyv credit +tat , ;re�qufemdl a` tmrlark�Ys !cxia ;OL f roat yir'dsa , f�1 ��Ettida'�P�1`a�;��ea es�, N YK 3 tn� to p�teiii.en ser a pca�ect by rAra�ect�basis to at"1o+,rr 2. Fs� t3ae c� aaad 3 triait�c' feasibte �Y f� 3. Is the genta coepi'deservng of posrsuir fue�tlterT Any additional feedback ariit` be wel'co both by the 40jp cant-and staff. OR:ns 0 Attachments Wr cc: Design Review CoWttee/Ccffmrcial Teat t, E 3 M ' ` P q S t 1 i COUNTY OF AUL-112.7 1 A �� - 1 1110 1` ,r,o ± ; 1`\i SCAN PERNARDINO AUL 1 nw, 4 CATY OF CC)Ulrn OF SA 8EH INO ISCN FONTANA EC VL Awk ND USE LEGEND I LAND SE LEGEND COUNTY'OF SAN BERNARDINd CITY OF RANCHO G GAWIONGA I aU.Fm%F.aaf io ER CyPit F ai17N, au-tJ10 .K4 a14WO, /,.. � &-1 CUA/Kid I tF.�Gio!Fib yL VmY I.oN(1-6 taus/4") aES-vto. (.RU.FY+-:x.N IO ks=s LOW 0-4 au4/,4').' kEs.t. I oU.>mr-,�ca<e F LO WN.Ili lrEs-2 S RU.Pelt/lCa7f. IVC4YiCX� f3CN. FV.Y,ta+CE IOHHvaV'nQi 1 t7U./4�/Gp/ FC : OP@I�9GF� Rath-4TPO./Uriu1Y ! l d EN@iPRY u+wat. EXISTING NE LAND USE ��iC'" �t� �PLANN114G AREA STUDY EXISTING :4 TF1E CARYN COtdPAHY ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLANK WEST VALLEY FOOTHILLS COMMUNITY PLAN. 1,4"tors,lose UPPER '.iUkMIT cry �a4�awuSiwa.r� � � .1l�/'"�V77Nrc. t�'t1C `p aAonWsa� 44 plal (I A IJA 11 COPIER sumw r aa�ri wPsw.a �— sTAnS Wi 4,i-IAFI P1�.MJ iAr 1 SUMMARYA` L NerArw ress ✓«/tee /J.w. Ss�f XGx ZSG: PG��d�n1�G�QQ�I •� llsWANDA I SAN SEYAINE Liu MOW p O.T. PLANNING AREA STUDY THE t`ARYN COMPANY L7GYIt�lL{��LN�� unarPhetO�ni�a wt —. •� •�,. � PCs c 7 A//a�ac 11 c i f Y� s SITE PLAN CONCEPT Nil wrart TYPICAL SECTIOttTHROUGH LOTS 1 ETIWANDA/SAN SEVA1NE plump ��n PLANNIN3 AREA STUEYY y �UVI�J�It Il Cal TM CARYA O6W4Y f/� } - LsuuPlanrcoidcGaw� I �L.,,J'' �r , r t•. yr�qs$.sM•rt � "fir .� ,. , c Aso MIrA "•V, " . ,.� -r :ac Pa ni r^i-v f � r JO Rasta• f. � �� '/�.,r !` � as �" ; ^,""•carp p.�'�. �.I,{`,a+r #.� _�--�� " �` •as , J/^[:�' af7�..r►tf i�r'p �...r—> �; •` s`.T'.�c µ ��,�:wa�w`�na'�>N *"t't.re..• {�'y 7(t �•t�•� � tnD '. is .ts ,M• ! ���• p'•R•dtinY M� nt,• �.� a ���. r. wt'�fr t' ���' t4i .�''� tr d:.�z�at o�•�,�'•Mt a>p y pj f(/f'� f ! m s I n>l r pn�t.^,,is •- l rfi .. i .✓ ,� \ r_ �� .R a\1.14.1N t .R`aY W A 1 *iy :L �1 # _ L LLLL Lil`iJ i U 11� ` ; C i'a �•' 1�,-,��+ et'w� ��""rc;aa`r>(�ra�s•(� /= F t.`�•._ 0 a t u EnWANDA I SAU SEVAINE PLAtiNNtNG AREA,STUDY ortrm (� THE CAR VN COMPANY , � i+lAkFi :�„� kMUMIY ' e� a i T t f C L 2 ~ e , i ' YJa7C'aW/N L Li L L �: 1 wxOPEN SPACE f. 811M Ry lik1�IVGSSLrY -Fw- tU^ �GY'�ir i✓7 T.���_iiR�'3viF-.h{� ��. •;STIWANDA!SAN-SEVAINE k PLANNING RF��A STUDY ; ., OPEN SPACE KEY MAP ,��.;. COMPANY 2RsgRt2RLAq;lqs OLgM CITY OF RANCHO CUPkMOAOA.CALIFOPAIA �i� +Rwnatg3c 40, 777 71 Yl UMKk. -61JuMIT. t , - '� ekr-vxrTcs �+ LQ7/(r 3y'.IWT k `I � ntbA 1 SA�i SEVAINE` f LAKNIi1G AREA STUDY tea+lHw4atNe0eaM' � cery4Qfi sfmo a C IC�MQNGA,CAUFQAK f/GrFj ,y'/,. G 1Z141-- MIA %if.�rflkC.L.• �:�'+�!r�•�.L`,/j/lGt/• ,�r��1/G"l�. ' :., 3•Sl,�P��t��S•.SH.�u.�_ SI��w/ ,-ro � �p��.sE�~�.artr SCFIF Z95M !*�'f'MIN �'E%�'lG�+??'� ��,�• 1 :tea ,, �Xlsr.�l�wiiuc�aw AMW lacVa�r? r t 4`t 32�"THE CARYN COMPANY ..�try; �T 1 1 SJfi ti E A f� i ti t�t+iNC AREA STUDY Land/Plav/Desldn Groin <ianuef y Sa 1087 t f 7-7 i � � "�ES /'G4/�,�,.•'��..G-';;l 'S' R-f Tc A-3 EX/�i�/U GY%lOi�v�v /. EX�GT'GOGgTiar�S o G!1G4UJ'/�Tas �� fz�X lel Tj EES T 6E.OETE�N!/�t/F„p IrtrPjEZO. /y1F�1NOEtg/�// �°' ,7oG /NAND OVT"/4(.oNG vPP�K�d1-1i4lr 3•SE9Pe5/6Et�'S•SH��t.�_ S/.��;wAc�e To � ��v �1PF�?f..,ASM 12 NI N.GAr/ C.4� CL W7 �� N•p QTa �C cm/ Sia�w,�c�e To � Ez j.57C_-lfj-e - t r �"sir O �c�rEG: ia _ 71 CITY OF.RANCVO CUCAMONGA '. ; '`r P11d L- ERGAb SECTION :,THE CA.RYN -COMPANY SEVsAIM PLANNING AREA STUDY Land/P9anj,Jr.3n Group January 6. '19hf � €X/S�TNI!�/NDl4oW 1i` Ff+N �4VG SI©Ewil�T� ENG��/�I f � r, B l � 3`t I6F � 3`i� ic+i�irY•; I t G:t t�ss� SC�t/iFf?Ea7SYsf7' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TYPICAL ROAD",SEWTIONS THE CARYN COMPANY � ETIWANDAISAN SEl/-A"�'t iRt—AM"AING AREA STUDY Land/Plan/Design Crow January 15,1887 �' is /(/OT"� MI!F t �Y /l/l/G 11ve/S 115%)c Ah coNGT 'titiltNtTY a= 5/t?���l.�K� /•'%KING Tt`�L I00` !vf 6 Ir Aih CUi�/Gt2ETe I7 G. Co,M�Uitri7"Y _I /hE1•�/ K H/KlAle-' Tit/L t t� 39 CITY OF"RAINCRO`CUCAMONQA THE CAR:YN :COMPM4Y ETiW} `rIC3P.7rS`r�fii` E`4 �E`PiANNING AR5A S-TUDY .:w Land/i:4anlDesi,gn Group JtnUErw 5, 1987 �� 1 i ell el Re;e�lqmaxlZl GG� 4 t I' CITY IF RANCHO CUCAMONGA j� TYPICAL ROAD SECTIONS HE CARYN COMPANY ETIWANDA/SAN SEVAINE PLANNING AREA STUDY Land/Plan/Design Orou January' 6, 18ae per' %j i; MOO: �Xis�n/G�/N.o��--ram BEGS {. *, fr/a✓t/ NES TaSG' L�N�of cr�� `ie;•o.�---� Bf cN .rvt-;j x f CITY OF RANC'40 CUCAMONQAf -cYPICAL ROAD THE CARYN COMPANY ETIWANDAJSAN SEVAlf "PtAHNJNG AREA STUDY Land/Plan/Design: Croup January 6s 1ea7 C SiPEwAr�: St�CW,��e - �� (oZ L e GaNG�El'E loNCi�='� .�L S! E tPG �CK IL Z + [elf Zip I CITY OF RAi.NCdO CUCAMONGA T I YPICAL ROAD SEA' ON's i THE 'CARYN COMPANY ETIWANDAISAN SEVAINE PLANNING AREA STUDY LandfPlan/Dssigr, Grew January 6, 1087 n t� IF 4 L r CITY OF RANCHO CULAMONGA STF REPORT ' 4 � , DATE: f �ia�uary+, 8, 148T _ 1977 TO: Chairman and Ambers of the PlannAg GoWsg't^! FROM: Brad Buil6r, CitY Planner BY: lioward Fietds, Assistant P1a tin er 1 SUBJECT: DEVEL-QP HT• REVIEW 8!7-04 - tOWER PAR:ili R t9=9rt19S ��I�IEEUA) e^' regares v y e approaeo� e'3'e`W roe;1;y e ftfriattngi the .requtredreveal., for• th0AtrP,l�c+cated a the northwest corner of Fooxntil SoUlevard' and; Have(, M, Avenue I. BACKGROUNDS The originally approved building'eleva'tiotis called for._ " a Farr . , etail on the side and rear elevatf- s. On April 23, 198E the Planning CORMss em considered a re j?ert by,the applfcant x to waive this regWrement. The Commisifoss upod.i considerable'' discussion Op:eased concerns over, the ¢otenCial 'toss of the ` furring d3tail sincei-1- was used to delineate .the color bands p" around the building. ,ne aFPiicant stated thp,':saa efft�^t cold be •., achieved by use of a 3/4" reveal. The Coatmission agreed to V usei, ' of the 3/4"'reveal or bands. The applicaRt_theo received a T orary; Octuparacy Permiv al aAng occupancy 6 the theatr°4 ontingent upon coa ,tenon'��i ti e, t reveal' as r.,ell os st±ve�ta'i",'sinor items. 'As worts progNotsed on;site, I t0e appro;.ed 3/44 reveal was omitted. Instead, i tort-Joint, gro:,ve has been used, cor+trary to what the COMAItsion:had ,ppraved.', ` To date, all outAiarding correction stems have`been completed f except the 3:14" reveax The aiiplicmnt is requesting consideration by the Panning Cov ':Msion to, delete this "quiremznt entirely, sincfs they feel the original intent has been met with th+- ti001_ Joint groove. NoKever, the applicant,-,,has.also submitted a drawing showing a proaose;i alternative. This drawing will be posted at the meeting. It sna%s the. pUcenvant of a metal channel at the existing_, tool +point groove. Staff doe-:: not believe the propoi4d alternnive provides the same effect as the approver"3r4" reveal- ITEM POPPartne����� H. REG9I EI�DA1'IQ 1` �S MRAOC ends the P`t4nning gC®e #ss`si n co r ` r' kappaORC aP ���r5egraes arty if' fotrnc '° acceab1gg x ileti�� X n r,. tion d aondt�,?` 3r 4. ^�evea�., ly BB:NP:ns Js ' Attachments: l.��ter�i roar AP014 ant�Da,0 ua0uar�1 ; 198X 419$S Ctann hg�dAid,S.,on,Nliva; r' xhibitF "R" Fuirrc�,koc4t Ekliib C r o� a1�i r zs'Div 5 Extii b "C" - Pr os J r. L 11 f tp " bK 3- �®.rariuieee�n�osuosw S k y, Mr Brad. Bull. (r,✓ CITY PLANNER CITY OF M� ,NCHQ CUnAM.ONGA, I 9320 BaZe- ine Road Rancho C tcamongha _CA* 9fC730 ^' C5 Deal{ BY+3d4� This letter is wx= ten one rr�iv g the reuea�l s tha& Here; }« required,, to segarattea:tie eo]ux+. bi�3s; on tote .ette, i o the Edwards Czrrc at e. i!z :,, Centre. n a dare t►a nex!Y B�#5xne;ss As =,you know: these: x2�zaa is we're e`1�:"rated,• durxal the s construction prc�,ce'ss. an3: t'he� Tower Partnership ciesirss to have' this: candttl for final accupaney, xemmVed„.i' APParently, what happened is the fo 'elan Gellatly (axchit ct) and Don Christesa4; Cthe devd#2, ;' at the time) cone-nced, t2ze pla==nn%ng Cntnmissa bn to allow the removal of furr,.ing that had. originally baenl s'ttown o. the building exterior. The pl:annirig Comm�ss�ion,Wad• � concerned that eLiminat3ng the furring would 'nod pr cid for a clean eUjl1ineation of the thr the ee color s; r bands (St4") ndirig ` 11)building-. ,ls a resolute on, it was agreed tba; reveals would s��aa".eseparate the three color bands: Subsequently, Mr. Christeson felt that.':plasteriny, the building was. not° necessary and appealed Jb the City to have the plastering, retnoved. A substantiaj-delay resulted., and the City insisted the plastering remain. During the. delay, L'r,<':kdwards became concerned about the progress of the job, and upon the City"$ .final answer regarding the plaster, Mx. ChristesOn instructed the plasterer to begin w#k immediately. At tht',; Poi^,�t, Mr. Christeson was faced with a bus negs an@: ?ming decision. He felt that a "tooled-Joint"groovz would separate the color bands just as wei,I as the reveal. With T2r. Edwards wanting to occupy. and the building AML 711 _ Page January N already fehxnc Baer e3(ule het'xnst�ucted the plastere"' to ' el:.m?r a�,� �ii�.trety al, 40d�apply -the "tooled-]oint"' groeie. � L� This br s rxs `ent�,:all of th carrect3on i,te � regarding. , x the Cinema are now cram fete eae t this one issue. - s p r p W& hawk q bmi" d' ;dr7wzng showing alter�atives to .=:veal Fiowev se were done as, a -16,0 exyeresse, Lind wre do no t fea>± ePa tyhe;r �� these xea tnez�As• aril) add to the r jA aesthetics a� thta 1,T2as.: / d 1dditioziFl3y �y� aRl�aisc�dnE o ,�eseaxchyha been deny n n e�ort to ire o h revveal i but'his, gannot be -- done withoutu}s � tanal cos' sx oz� dterteraorangr among t, ,yC,}� effects. Wernowledge `t hdt a mistakes has 'been rAad r r and have doneti:a�t wa can to correo Et a Tick accommodate the a City." .. �. --Inasm ich as�he b" ltt�ng ha, turned out Very pleasing �,b the ever and'mast amporta�cyy thr� org�aa " rrrt" of the reveal conetstsonu has bsai.met I i.e,, the tooled'-joint groove works very well tb rLipiza to the ,color bands)., the Tower Partner zp respectfully r��ue�sts that tJie PiannizAft omnisiioa allow tbe'"bui!`�,c-Ang to �,emean unchanged. a ce '*:i . avid rI al , General. Partner �. TOWER PARTNERSHIP ' DM:c h = a -a Trw " sect 3s,-ioner (temper zsked 'p.. theee was a way to use the school prApetty 7for temp p4ri �i ,d6�& the school 'is 6eveloped. Mr. Ho11 ey adv than staff--would In i tiv�hfs su�gestien. � Steven For 'rtill'.iam ty?`. any, advised 0-%,t in areas where parks are located fin, addi!ional .e Space off-street parallel` parking have been provided. c Motion: ;loved by 4 mpe14., e�Anded by Ghitiea, un'a ly c.ar, 'df to appravc tl�e Victoria Park conceptuM' design. OLD BUSINESS � ) R. 4)EVELOPMCNT REVII'M 85-22 - EDWARDS CINERA - .A request to, modify the approve# bul Wing,.e e,4=7ons. or a P Tex movie theater of 2 Square feet, within an a6rcave.A master plan (Virgi,nia Bare Centers hoed..,a d on the northwest corner of f6thtil and.Haven,, it. the General Commercial dGO District - APH 1017-1 4-01 and 03.' ` Howard }Melds; Assistant.Planter, revieweed the staff r'eport,' , N. Glen GeiTatly, Bisset! Architects„ advised that when the final plans were in the Building Department for t�lan check;-it was noted that a dets l-pertaining to the side apd rear;�elevattons Showing a layere' 4urring effect on the S � AL elevations had peen omitted. He advised that the detailing was never part of :. any documents which had gone before the Design Review Committee,' Planning Commission or City Council. He adiised that what was shot.;. was a color band treatment using three colors with 'some layeri69' of the stucco on the'-front fascade and returning it around the corners on the two sides. Mr. Geliatly 1t presented a model of the building. Chairman Stout asked if the actual construct on;:drawings with t6 detail on th(;in had been submitted to the City as t done 'in error. Ar. Gellatiy replied that was correct.~ r ,. Chairman Stout stated that he had gotten confused that Mr. GellatTy was talking about the front elevations ar..d what he was actually, saying was the, ! furred out detail is to remain on the front elevatioh, with a step ddwn_effect as it returns on the two sides. Therefore, the only part of the construction drawing detail which was being requea-ted for deletion is the side and rear a elevations which the applicant intends to put some type of scored treatment in there, Mr. Gellatiy concurved and stated that"fine 'bent was a 1 opq, clean reveal allowing for a clean color break line. Planning Commission M!hUtes -1>- - April 23, 1985 ' 4 d Chai°rm ` sttsr�r stated that t44 confusion came because he understood tiie v,. apply nt want Ad: bq; remove the furred out detail from all elevations of the bui1dtng Ne rerA'll'ed discussion.xelarding, the detail 3q the'frdnt elpyat but did. not'reca� .f there`was discussion relative:ta thecsues ands° believe it had �en„mav�e a ao.dition« ' of appeal. !ie stated he abjection to this reques 'beca�rse:; them are two bit Mngs ore eit'ner szd,� of =1�; and there ins some,,detail in the' color band' Whic h fis consistent r�+th what has been r4ga iced. Further, that from-41 di>6nce the;furred out dttaii ld be seer,on the back anyway.;,., L� u Camt�issianer 2mP 1 si<ated a �bncerq that there 'as nevE; an ;nderata�dlo a `. Design R"evfew ghat"there was gcrirnivio, be a change In text�see,}ci,ha building. a adviaed,,that'he,�& gone to the site arid the'•aexturG 1,o�ks lice t an amateur had' laid out tiro bi:nck ratheri tha)i trying tc accomplish ,the appearance by .adobe. He s'�ated ttat nowhere an # e su;~afttais does it show that the. buil�df:, cture will not,bd similar to wnt e�cis�ts, Further, that It has been rhangei from ,est r ings and 3s not'a�cceptat�le:. .. le felt the to cture shauiit'be dash,,-which►i i the,approvad texture`{forthe cerde, Mir. Gella ly pointed o¢rt that this is 13 arre M to wi`;l a"number of bu idfngs. to be built,. and did' not see'a eoblem�4�!th:goingr,to► dlffererit types or ; texture as long,as tt;� cOor is co 91-stillt ,end compatible. ns� stai ed that the use of the same texture c�tl be-fn"onotonious on 13 ricees: Ili advised that he war. trying to get a texturo`)v %�Vton with this type1`of finish, and it may not look ' like much now but 'onc 14ts painted the1, finish gives a rastic 3ppe�sf=nrn.L-. He explained at "sank. 'vipe" is o;thirt goat of plas,er which is s wiped-onto the- block to over Cite joints. ',fie advi§ d tha .the colors, proportions and break up uld satisfy all. concerns. He pointed out that.mission style a�aitectu , has all t�Ypps of textures zTd that nothing corststenC in the old win Sies. Commissioner Ghitiea stated that the cb rity trzi!l :uns behind this- Project. She -pointed out that the project tc'`the north was roQuired_to do considerable upgrading to the backs des and there are other.place:: in the City which back up W the community tee it that have bten s+esluired to brf-rg detaining around the back. , She wanted to see, this project give that saw i con,Oderation.ta tie r~ Mr. Gel fatly stated that .stucco texture.-yas never discussed at art of the meetings. Further, that during Oasign Re,riew on all of the projects everyone knew the finish,was going to,-be stucco, but it could have been blots on, hand trowelled orsr�e other type of stucco treatment." The- fora, the applicant could have got."to a cheap finish, but was providing a method"which is unique. There were no fur'fhelr public commen:.s. Commissioner McHipl Concurred with the. c4ntiruance of the color band. He'was ' concerned with the Lexture change and agreed that it should he consist nt with the -xisting.builOn.gs. �t Planning CoRmissitAfiM nutes `' 11 -i8 kpriif23, FS... T i _ ,r A: .,.,�. ., ,,.yV�•�ggt r* t.,` I o, a RP '' ""� i�9i 'wi Via, torn. �fioudtiv� �:' s b.= MsNi ea ,j eGonded v to to dol�htey the furred out deta�t t�n"�'i` ai th es a�tt*i rea ' r, aTeV.AbIons,. The building texture. s fx .oeexa�srtw�u�q€comer feted btid dasn.as �? : ,r OOn Chrhfsteso apli ri anth stated than the Comm j 11i r Was chat l'engi nd, tale - I profess��or rhuaiq�.q r M�, Gebla&t,, by, s :%ti,f q; that ey` know+ more abouii design Nd Bohm the t"iia�i�sW4's goi-ng, to nook 11ke than he does �`! sug-As-Od that the+ GameH s ore at1�l oak he;.,work _Co copti€nue,unti lk enou�►�} or=y the war�11 1yas been cRmpl.eted< tag �,udgef t t Rt"1y., He p0imted Oat chat the, h4Tl % nowhere near som�1?e�d;and�t bO tnqr,,d0dje_@i to'or early ., H# felt th&t byf they time it is all fiPOs;aed and pats tei t h Co s n would be`'happy w�t t, si€nce iLt wod,i d Tnok 1411,e a sbut�wy� wa s,rniK s„ i}ot of cha'ra ter., 1e stated that there are if number of b are not consiste t, ands"re,c steel that, he be:g ven thaw iltexfirbil -tiY, Chairman There was none, thefiefore the g�isgr�;naul€ motton`,carried.by the f4 9wi`ng votea x ' AYES: GtiWMI,FQNERS REMtPEL, ,MCNIEL, CH TIE% STOUT NOES: CryMN SSIONERS: WNE ABSENT: Cu`�uOESSIONERS: BARKEP -carried I I MMISSIdtt BUSINESS ��� 0. T. S - gral ltepr Brad Buller, ,tY >�Ainner, gave as overvi av of the current status and review, nrordures fort Is, .,• . Chn .ran Stout, advis had this: item, paced;, dfl the agenda bepau'se the sys i doesn't seem.to be - �ingc He. asked Lida staff prepare a ibpori,an" the status of-trails wf h some ly5z orsst3ff tine and budgetary. needs. -4e beli eyed:�her-e array be the need fo he expenditure. of 'Funds for a cps,.';1 tant,. I to Vitt, together."not only a plan whit indicates an inventory of tfaits and their currant condi ti on,.al ong with a li f current prob'6ms associated Witt, ctampl.eteAq the system, but an implementatio fan af'hew" it will work. He sugggstt4 that the report.include same type ei s eduled time plan. Commi'ssfoner Ch tiea, +sated tfrat she wholetheartrdly.su ted this direction. ". Mr. Buller stated that if it Is determined;,that trail a p- city for next' year's work program, this proposal might require a budget expen €�� whr<h would have to be approvediby the Ci.ty'Lounail. ! Planning Cummissi:in 'minutes -I9 April 23, 1986 - a Ji x- I i r..• f ;.� �; r � � � � ®� i J ti h W4 i l h ♦. rl. .� �7 1 i NORTH CITY or, A R-AP ♦ P •�ti CHO 4 PLANNING DIN' ISK��v �F. t { Jv 1 4t;jas �� - NO IUH a �4