Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1987/04/22 - Agenda Packet
0701-02 0 4- 22 -87 PO Agenda � o � t r I f t S GtirCA. / CITY OF RANCHO CL,Y',.vv1(X \GA 76 r y. "L11''i�Tll\O COiII'�IISSION - AGENDA :+ 1977 WEDNESDAY APRIL 22, 1987 7:00 p.m. 1: MONE3 PARK COMUUNITY CENTER. 916'1 BASE LINK CfiIJ CUCAJIONGA, CALIFOR.NI..,. Y rLi;. Pledge of AllagWm yy doll can Commissioner Chitiea Commissioner McNiei Commissioner Emerid= Commissioner Tolstoy HL A.nnounceMnts lV. Presentation. of Commendation Resoiettion to E. David Barker V. Consent CalendeP i ected to be The following Consent Calendar items oxe exP routine and non - controversial. They will be actee „ On by the Commission at one time without discussion. if anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. A. EYIVIRQ1dMENTAL ASSESSMENT For, DEVELOPMENT i REVIEW sf. 0' - INVESTMENT BUILDING GROUP - The development of a 212,289 square oot industri&i building on 9.5 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Slbarea 14), located approximately 650 feet north of 4th Street- on the east side of Sa-Aa Anita Avenue APN 229.431-10, 11. R. RESOLUTION OF DENIAL FOR ENVIRONMENTA. ?, ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 8 7-08 WESTERN PROPERTIES - The development 4 an office park Consisting o four 2__ry buildings totaling 250,000 Park square feet on 16.58 acres of lend in the , office at District of the Terra Vista Planned Community, the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drivs - APN 1011. 421 -06, 10, and 09. (Related to this , , project is Tree Removal Permit 87 -20, requesting tie removal tf two groves of Eucalyptus trees (app ro 56 trees) within the site. k _ VL 'p, may' 11, -The fou Wznf 7,,tems are public hearings in which concerned individuals M4 voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address 6,2a Commission by stating your name an� addmss. All such " opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each t project. o: J' C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND 'TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 10543 - BARYON DEVELOPMENT _ A subdivision of 4.29 acres of land intp'''1 parcels in the General industrial District (Subarea 8),`4 on the north tatod side of Jersey Boulevard betweeni.;` Avenue and _:lea Vincent Avenue - APN 209- 142 -11, 12, D. ENVIRP' NMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -13 - MULLER - The request for a Master Conditional Use Permit to allow Financial, Insurance and Real Estate services for - .Building E, F, and G; and a 9,365 square foot recreational facility (Star Fitness Center) for Building E within an 18.42 acre approved Master Plan in the General Industrial District Subarea 3, located at the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 9th Street - APN 209 - 021,16,17, and 05. E. ,IV3R.ONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -10 - BARMAKIAYI - The request for, -,, Master Conditional. Use PerWt to allow Administrati Offices, Professional /Design Services, Financial Insurance and Real Estate Services within an existing multi - tenant, Industrial Park in the General Industrial District (Subarea 1), located at the southwe;,t corner of Vineyard Avenue and Arrow Route - APN 207 - 261 -49. F. CONDITIONAL, USE PERMIT 87 -08 - CUCAMONGA CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP - A proposal to establish three classrooms dnd amulti- purpose roam for an existing church within on Industrial Park (Subs ea 4), at the northwest corner of 7th Street and Archibald - APN 207 - 171 -46. G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -06 - RANCI-10 CUCAMONGA REALTY PROPERTIES IL LTD - A request to serve aleoholi; beverages within an established 3,700 square foot restaurant within the Neighborhood Commercial .District (NC) located at the northeast corner of 19th and Archibald (9740 19th Street) - APN 202- 171 -57. A �o H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMitd AND—CIDIVIONAL USE PERMIT 86-04 -RYDER --The develapliieh�--of -4, tm�ck rental, lease, sale and maintenance facility on 4.23 acres Gf land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 14) lo 'ted on the west side of Sp-it-t Anita Avenue northof 4tJi Street APN 229-33"6. L MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84-34 - SHERIFF & ASSUCIATES, - Proposal for remodeling the store front facade', minor building additions and reconstruct drive approacheslor an existing Neighborhood Commercial shopping center on 7.8 acres of land in the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District located et the northeast corner of Cavielian Avenue and Base Line Road - "N 202-381-24 thru 26, 28 thru 33, 35 and 36. J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSES.qMENT, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87-11 - ELKS LODGE NO. 2,570 - A proposal tq locate an Elks Lodge,pf 6,037 sqtwe feet within a multi- tenant industrial center in the Wustrial Park District (Subarea 6), located at 8696 Utica Avenue - AFN 209-142- 18. K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87-14 - NEW HOPE CHURCH - A request to establish a 7,000 iduare foot church with n an existing 12,960 square foot multi-tenant industrial facility in the General Industrial Land Use District (Subarea 3), located at 9521-A Business Center Dr - APN 2a9-021-39. L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13305 - LEWIS HOMES - The total development of a residential subdilelsion of 8.08 acr*;s within the Terra 'Vista Planned Community (Low-Medtum Residential 4-8 dwellit.g units per acre into 48 lots), located on the suuthwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Mounta.Ji View Drive - APN 227-151-13. VIL New Buehm M. TERRA VISTA NORTHEAST qUADRANT AREA DEVELOPMEN7 PLAN - LEWIS HOMES - Consideration of 'an area developmeit plan—for the northeast quadrant of the Terra Vista Planned Commuf--ity for that portion of Terra Vista located south of Base LineRoad, north of the central Major greenway spine, east of Milliken Avenue, and West of Rochester Avenue. III DicWtoes Reports _ a N. INDUSTRM L SPEGEFIC PLAIT `-&MENDMENTS - Sl)SAREA - Review aP existing Subarea 8 iancl`use and development standards requested by the CKy GounelL ii O. COMMUNITY PARKWAY TRAIL ON BERYL ' P. BILLBOA 2D AMORMATION Q. PLANNING DIVISION WORk P3ii;GRAM -Oral Report IK. Commission Business Y. Pubile Comments This is the time and place for the general public to add' As the Commissions already ap, Items to ,Le discussed here are those whit„1'ao nat this agenda. gar on XT. Ad' 3melt The Pian4ting Commission has adopted Adri''�istrgtive , Regulations that set an 11 p.m. adjournment time. If items gn , beyond that time, they shall be heard only with Ow consent of , the Commission. 5. AAL VICINITY MAP .�e } 1 SpHtRE A lH�LlfKUae k; E.. 1111 CITY O RANCHO CUCA MONGA 0 K* I 4i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE. April 22, 1987 TO: Chairmar. and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller,* City Planner j; BY Debra Meier, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: 'NVIRONMENTA ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87-02 - iftftbIMAI UULLUINU bKUUP - The aevelopment of a 21Z,25a square toot industffal bailding on 9.5 acres of land in - the General "Industrial District (Subarea 14), located approximately, 650 feet north of 4th Street on the cast side of Santa Anita Avenue - APR 229r33!-I0, 11. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action'kequested: Issuance of a Negative Declaration B. Surroun0ing Land Use and Zoning: lro—rTff - Existing manufacturing facility; Industrial Specific Plan Subarea 14 South - Existing Warehouse/Distribution facility; Industt.Jal Specific Plan Subarea 14 East - Railroad Easement and Edison Right-of-Way; Industrial Specific Plan Subarea 14 - West - Vineyard; Industrial Specific Plan Subarea 14 C. Genet al Plan Designations. 7r-3N—Cf-79Tte----G "raT-1-n-dustrial North - General Industrial South - General Industrial East - Utility Corridor West - General Industrial 0. Site Characteristics: The project site is presently vacant, coverer with abandoned vineyard and desert brush. Natural ground slopes gently southward about 2% gradient. North and south of this site are existing industrial buildings with a Railrr,ad easement abutting the east boundary with provisions for fistura rail spur. ITEM A PLANNING COMMISSION ST'AF1= REPORT OR 87 -d2 INVESTMENT BUILDING GROUP April 22, 1987 Page 2 E. Parkinq Calculations: r No. of No. of Type of Sgisare Parking Spaces Spaces Use Footage Ratite Required Provided Office 8,064 11250 32 Warehouse 204,225 1/1000 O st 20,000 sf'N V2000 (2nd 20,000 sfi 1/4000 (over 40,000 sf) 71 Total 103" -'lug II. ANALYSIS• A. General: The applicant is requesting Environmental Assessment To—r—OF construction of an industrial warehouse building of 212,289 square feet. Upon approval of a Negative Declaratioa, the City Planner will grant approval of the project based on conditions recomme ded by the Design and Technical Review Committees. 8. Desi gn Revf ewr Commi ttee: The Desi gn Review Committee (Chi ti e c Q anti vo eman ) reviewed this project on April 2, 1987. The Committee rec,ended approval of the project with the following conditions: 1. Provide an employee plaza for the north side of the building. This plaza may be located against the f north property line if connected to the office area by exposed aggregate walkway across the drive - I aisle. Phis, plaza as well as the plaza at the south j building face shall include clusters of trees and l{ appropriate htrdscapr,, 2. The fluted formline sections should be sandblasted to expose aggregate. 3, Streetscape landscaping should include informal tree clusters and undulating berms to enhance architecture. 4. Provide row of columnar shaped trews within strip of land between of turf block and Railroad easement to provide screening of view from 4th Street. 2, PLANNING COMKIISS40N STAFF REPORT OR 0742 INVESTMENT BUIr0ING GROUP April 22, 1187 Page 3 7 c. Tvhnicaf Review Committee; "s e�Technical Revie4 Committee has reW awed project an determined that with recomaended ,Conditions of approval the proje_t is consistent with applicable Standards and Ordinances. 0. Site Characteristics: Upon review of Prt I of the Initial Study ana completion of Part II of the Environmental checklist staff has found no significant ity,acie related to the development of this industrial building. 111. RECOMME 0ATION: Staff recommends issuance of a Negative ell Mra0. on f r' Development Review 87 -02. Respectfully submitted, Brad Bu er City Planner BB:DMcsgr Amok Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C° - Landscape Plan Exhibit "D" - Building Elevations sss •r yy, ,rataar j'0 Hntb qwf �' ` IaYTT. J�4.t NISI sss •r yy, ,rataar j'0 \\ ; •. , • \YaRt III tiny. Me � t ` 1 `�. F l LI CI'T'Y Or RANCHO CCCAma \•Grp,, PLANNING DI VLSI N l E, _1 tY.n ae tar, tas� if I�. •1 1 1 •f1 / I \OUF nlu: ' qwf \\ ; •. , • \YaRt III tiny. Me � t ` 1 `�. F l LI CI'T'Y Or RANCHO CCCAma \•Grp,, PLANNING DI VLSI N l E, _1 tY.n ae tar, tas� if I�. •1 1 1 •f1 / I \OUF nlu: P90ViP6 FMPt 0766 'ftAzA i On raY. ,.0 LYNN A.G. PAMM r it I 11 1 1 1 - 7Y- ;7/ �'eMe55 �iN,�L ,Ceil /�iel G (JEs7"R °RDUf �N� 7�-KEs NORTH CITY OF T rrc`i: PX 0 '7-C» RAINCHKO CLCPj�IO\+ e� T rrLr: d7"� �� PLANNING III\'LSIONt E\HIW -. SCALC -._.® rwoo caN�csttttiti+l. � �, PH- 111 1 1 - 1 6 lOYR1H •Tfi(T _ it I 11 1 1 1 - 7Y- ;7/ �'eMe55 �iN,�L ,Ceil /�iel G (JEs7"R °RDUf �N� 7�-KEs NORTH CITY OF T rrc`i: PX 0 '7-C» RAINCHKO CLCPj�IO\+ e� T rrLr: d7"� �� PLANNING III\'LSIONt E\HIW -. SCALC -._.® r+ s � e/U-44,rar rrR-Jwo1F r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAI*Vlo GA PLANNING Cal %TSjaN A i x 11 NORTH resat OKI �V- o' TrrLE: 44/1 EXHIMT. SCALD 11 inn nim-111-w-H .4 0 0 o c 7 t� ■ �k � ttttltt� 0 CITY Of. RAINCHO CUCAbIONGA PLANNING DINrOv A- rrc�Nt: _a Jam. EXlilMT -.—R M.%Lc: NORTH- i o a 6 o rrc�Nt: _a Jam. EXlilMT -.—R M.%Lc: NORTH- i E IE r: r CITY Or, R.�` `;: CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT a w z. O 4t' DATE: April 22, 1487 1977 TO: Chairman and I"bers of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Associate Planner SUBJECT: RESOLUTION OF DENIAL FOR' ENV!RONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ULVELOPENT REVIEW 87-08 - 5. e evveel-opme'li of-aoffice pa consisting of our 2 -story buildings totaling 260,000 square .'eet -on 16.58 acres of land in the Office Park District of the Terra Vista Planned Community, located at the northeast corner of Haven Menue and Toren Center Drive - APN 1011 - 421 -06, 10, and 09. {Related to this project is Tree Removal Permit 87 -20, requesting the removal of two groves of Eucalyptus trees (approximately 66 trees) within the site. I. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission, at its regular meeting of April 87Z87. conducted a Public Nearing to consider the proposed project. The Planning Commission could not make the necessary findings to support the proposed project, and directed staff to prepare a Resolution of Denial. Attached for your review is a copy t( of the Resolution of Denial. II. RECOMMENDA7 aN: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the attached Resolution of Denial. Res ctfully submitted,.. Brad 8u11er City Planner BB:NF:ns Attachments: Resolution of Denial ITEM e - "1 r RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF \6E RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION DENYIWG, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, A REQUEST FOR THE APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT REV --5W NO. 87 -08 '. THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN OFFICE PARK CONSISURG OF FOUR 2 -STORY BUILDINGS TOTALING 250,000 SQUARE FEET 04 16.58 ACRES OF LAND IN THE OFFICE PARK DISTRICT OF THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY LC.'CATED AT THE Ni tTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE ANC TOWN CENTER DRIVE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUI'►iORT THEREOF - APR 1011 - 421 -06, 10, ani 09 A. RECITALS (1) WHEREAS, Western Properties has filed an application for the approval of Development Review 87 -08, described above in the title of this Resolution. (ii) WHEREAS, on April 8, 1987, the Planning Comission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public meeting on the subject matter. The Planning Comission, unable to make the findings in support of the architecture of the building, was willing to grant a continuance so that staff could work with the applicant in resolving the &,Fign issue. The applicant, at the meeting however, was not willing to consent to the continuance, and requested that the Planning Coission either approve or den; the proposed protect as submitted. The Planning Cnrt+uission, unable to ;sake the necessary findings to support the proposed project design, directed staff to prepare a Resolution of Denial for their review ark adoption on April 22, 1987 regular meeting. ('ii) WHEREAS, on April 22, 1987, the Planning Commission of the City Rancho Cucamonga adopted the Resolution of Denial for Development Review 87- 08. (iv) WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined, and resolved by the PIa tning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A of this Resolution, are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence as presented to this Commission during the above referenced April 8, 1997 meeting, including written staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: -e, Resolution Nei, TAR 87 -OS - Western, = properties April 22,, 1987 i Page 2 a. The prupbsed site plan lesign with the added recommendations frcm tie Design ,Review Committee .,beets the intent of the Peneral Plan Design Guidelines, the Terra Vista P`,anned Comnity, and the Development Cade. b. TNe proposed building deslen,* being a sophisticated style that consists of precast concreteL�4nels wfth textured treatment, colored mullions ad gray vision glass, does not provide . for transition or compatibil;iy -to the residential development to the north and the future community commercial to the south, in areas of character, materials and similar 4 elements. 3. Based 'upon' the substantial evidence presented to this Commisticn during the above- rezlerenced public greeting and upon the specifi- findings of_fact set forth: jn paragraphs 1 and 2 7 ;+ above, this ;.,'omission het-eby finds and. ;,ancludes at. follows: a. That the proposed project is inconsistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b. That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of ",'6p-. Developwnt Code, Terra Vita Planned CoMau i' .,ty` and the purposes. of the diatrict in which the site is located; and c. That, the architecrIral design is not in compliance with each of the" applicable )revisions of the Development Code, the Terra. Mmu alarmed Community, and d. That the proposed building design racy have an adverse architecturally Wtkied impact upon existing adjoining properties or improents in the vicnity. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions in paragraphs i, 2 and 3 agate, this Commission hereby denies, without prejudice to refile the Development Review. s. The Deputy Secretary to ibis Commission will certify to adoption of this Resolution. ,i 1 Resolution Ho,, DR 87-08 - Western Properties - a April 22, 1987 M Page 3 J' APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS �tdD DAY t4F A RI!., 1987. PLANNING C"ISSION`OF'7tiE CITY OF RANCHO CUIMMONGA 3Y: Carry . e1, CBS man ATTEST; va Buller, Nputy cz-e ary j 1, Boad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Comission of the City of Ranck;Cucamonga, do hereby certify ttw4':he foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted" by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commision held on the 22nd day of April, 1987, b; the following vc'te -to -Kit: AYES: COWISSIONERS: ;i NOES: COMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMISSIONERS: r 0 CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA ZTAFF REPORT G`JCAMp jZ DATE: Anril 22, 1987 19777 TO: Chairman and Men,bers of the Plannitig Commission FROM: Barrye R.. Hanson, Soiior Civil Engineer BY: Joe Stofa, Jr., Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIR60MENTt,* -' ASSESSMENT) AND' TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 10543 BARTON 10 phi" 77SM01visior, bf`-A-.2i'- acres o• an into 7 parse T—sin The —Gener-aT Industrial District (Subarea 8), located on the north side of Jersey Boulevard between Utica Aveaue- and Vincent Avenue APN 209-14211,12 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map as shown on F:Xhibit "8' B. Parcel Size: Parcel I- "37,026 Sq. Ft. Parcel 2 - 30,187 Sq. Ft. Parcel 3 - 33,628 Sq. Ft. Parcel 4 - 25,526 Sq. Ft. Parcel 5 - 20,473 Sq. rt. Parcel 6 - 17,250 Sq. Ft. Parcel 7 - 19,210 Sq. Ft. C. Existing Zoning: General IndustFial District (Subarea 8) D. Surrounding Land Use: Nortn - vacant South - Industrial Buildings East- Industrial Buildings West - Vacant E. Surrounding General Plan and Development Code Designations: North - General Ind* trial, Subarea 6 "Duth - Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial, Subarea 9 East - General Industrial, Subarea 8 West - General Industrial, Subarea 8 F. Site Characteriatics: Me—site is WZ-anf-with the land sloping approximately 4% from north to south. ITEM C E �t Planning Commission Staff Report PM 10543 Barton Bev. April 22, 1987 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS- The purpose of this parcel map is to create separate parcels for the individual buildings contained in Phase d of the Industrial Master Plan which was approved as Development Review 86 -26 (refer to Exhibit "CO) by the Planning Commission (on October 6, 1986. The parcel liVi s it relationship to the approved project site plan are shown on Exhibit "D". The project is currently under construction. The public street adjacent to and within the map will be improved in conjunction with the development. III. EN11 NTAL REVIEW: The applicant rcmpleted Part I of the Initial Stuly, RONME to con ucted a field investigation and completed Part II of tae Initial Study. No adverse impacts upon the envirorenent are anticipated as a result of this project. Therefore, issuance of Negative Declaration is appropriate. CORRESPONDENf,E: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent tr; s�!4oundfng property owners and;nlaced._ira the Daily Report Newspaper, Posting at the site has also been completed, V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input an elements of the Tentative Parcel Map. If after such consideration, the Cor;.�ission can recommend approval, then the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, Barrye .Hanson Senior Civil Engineer BRH:JS:dlw Attachments: Vicinity Map (Exhibit "All) Tentative Map (Exhibit 1181 1) Master Plan (DR 86 -26) (Exhibit OC") Phase I of Master Plan (Exhibit "D") Resolution and Recommended Conditions of Approval i { ti 4 �+� ��afT � {� ! u �'; s 7 4� j _ .. FOR W=%TaAI OR COMNENCIAL PURF05E1 ONIT TENT,ATI E PARCEL MAP NO. 10543 IN THE Ci fY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN • BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Erela ♦ 1W" Ce PAAM1 2 AW 1 OF PANC£L 4AP NO +216 1+ 10100 YQON 16, PAGES 66 !.Q 61 of MRCCL w /K, NCCQN01 K 9600 6CNN6eQINQ CQUNiT,. GILIfQeNl/ s• V 2 ZI L ynz': hianumin/ AatfJ A %+MMr. +r r"iasr n,xl +.r +l.•c. w.r Mlrrxp lbnPrr <a feel aiN wn a+ nu ur-+ro` d cn•_r ram ta... �� rN 4fnti 'tsLSU; >k +v le• A i way 3 Y.we' • .SN <wll !«4 ro+r7+'m user a. grrr/ My VS 'OtS'. .arp ' s.rr arerca nl.alre ��r ✓rt�ra•t �.M1r' ��e -��� �_• !!f' <qY a�rnti,� i iH�.vf1 »R N- r�`lrrF•thvt >a Stzsl.esN.' � "A'� " "` �.io!•a r • /l/ rule 2 � W W fy, 1 1 � i «•n i i 1 f> ..r « i I -. A' a Y Y O.l6 RrrR � ; ;a Nun w r a ^N I r N s 4 sat.enetl Q` • •i l riL rc.YS t td r11I... _ :_ r »J •It•i. a 4- r _• YRl rl %T'r 1Ilf Y >• : rI'/IarrllrW r I ur of %Kirk I C {.:dl'YiX ) Aflt•i'-���� ~��, Q•�� lbtNtJ #M R•Kr (atf r. x ���� fd erlR rwrlfF170f .ERSEY { � BWCEY6A0 r.. r »net were f 1- Y6R11t1 /btV1 fr. h.14 urs, .0. a u1sj cr <i•+ •ay.r. R.r it w.RPe, wra a / <+r r. rMr..r E d il O r" Ll s L c—sp Y COO, aW :s ®C, a. 0 MCO C.) w c Q m C"3 �i x A C� W W JERSEY BOULEVARD CITY OF Imo: �p��y�q yy�+�,= PHASE 1 of MOBSTER p RANCHO 911J1r liS�i`l�f� ME fnk Bt--Zle)_ C�� RESOLUTION NO.. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF R4N.W CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTJ;T;;VE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 10543 WHEREAS, T�,ltative Parcel Map Number 10543, submitted by Barton Development, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 7 parcels, the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, identified: as APN(s) 209 -142. 11,12, located on the north side of Jersey Boulevard between Utica Avenue and Vincent Avenue; and WHEREAS, on April 22, 1937, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the at7ve- described map, NOW, THEREFORE, THE FANIHO CUCAMONG4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physicaliy suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting p• >operty. SECTION 2: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 10543 is hereby approved subject to Te attached Standard Conditions and the following Special Conditions: SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. Notice of Intention to form and /or join the Lighting and Landscaping District shall be filed with the City Council prior to recordation of the map. 2. The lien agreement for the utility undergrounding oh 'the south side of Jersey Boulevard required for DR 86 -26, shall be modif�ed to pro rate the total cost to either parcels 3 and 4 only or all parcels, whichever is acceptable to the Developer, prior to recordation of the FinaT Map. 3. Sidewalk is required on one sidle of Red Oak Street, iowever, meandering sidewalk on both sides is acceptable. RESOLUTION PAGE 2 :77 r \1 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF APRIL, 1987_ PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY V RANCHO CnAfa4rA BY. •Larry f4 a airman ATTEST: Brad a er, eputy ecr`tary I, Brad Bullor,��Deputy Secrpt4ry of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, \Io hereby Certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduc�.d, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cugp�;nga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day 1,f n�ril, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMIS'40rs: NOES: COMMIS,Xa NER"s: ABSENT: COMMISSI6ERS: a m I e ds I 11 gg� e u � c R N ~ 4 Y ^.it w` IN � L M 21' Ng i, p ! b n� Y� p�� `yYy�y V JyygC Y g qil t.tlC �V W ®. R P G� .��•. V €$�i � ■ VC r + �V OL V L N N� �� o.�i O y M O �yy f Y oiz C ♦` 4GG may+ o�w �a�i.o� yyiu o qr� si «a: V Y "u'�I ITT +� v � 64 "#N` ym , -•�� LWV.O NYC at= X1 I 14 � lilt 4 Y IN � L M • Ng i, IN Y , Y� Y V JyygC Y g gY W P b N � ZL � ■ � V L N N� �� o.�i O y M O �yy f Y oiz C ♦` 4GG may+ o�w �a�i.o� yyiu o qr� si «a: V Y X1 I 4 Y IN � L M • Ng i, IN Y , Y� Y V JyygC { ! ZL r Y � �• L N N� �� P M O Y oiz !y yVo 4GG may+ o�w �a�i.o� yyiu o qr� si «a: a J Kam Y X1 1 4� �Z e� 09 Y . a- g 08! a Y� w\3 rOV iv o0 t�y� V a Q4 X e� 4L •• 4 ul 4�+ 4 Y Yh.� S N naiY _we a '0 3 �s �o 6�7 G C� �6J � Me Sg� ^iy i 4i Y y! ! I� VO � �.yyp4 i $ �4�_ MM w N >Y gryy L V }�Q�pO jYQf V .4 y as u g .a $P •.N tii..� CL 2y Yye• � Vy V MX e -3 Cwg} +p �t44 ♦qL1 N rCC _ i Lpp � yN � �ycyL 64i p M V*IY� A C •Ca i0�.. n N N Ls 4� �Z e� 09 Y . a- g 08! a Y� w\3 rOV iv o0 t�y� V a Q4 X e� 4L •• 4 ul 0 1� a LL '� L •N �L C �_ eyo to o = a fgY yr °$ CC ti ®G K�Tp G:iu� L t N 61 '0 3 �s �o 8 gg E � � .° -�� CL Yq ■4p rw Y,� Cwg} +p �t44 44y.{VO Nil Ls AL L'� �a 0 1� a LL '� L •N �L C �_ eyo to o = a fgY yr °$ CC ti ®G K�Tp G:iu� L t N 61 --- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM0NGA. STAFF REPORT ri DATE: April 22, 1987 {' Z TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission PROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, As;,ociate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -13 The regesS or a s er Conditlonal Uie Permit o a ow Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Services for Sui "(ding E, F, and G; and a 9,365 square foot Recreational Facility (Star Fitness Center) in Building E, within art 16.42 acre approved Master Plan in the General Industrial District Subarea 3, located at the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue* and 9th Street - APN: 209»021 -16, 17, 05. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action RE uestedz. Approval oi', a Conditional Use Permit to Mow Financial, ' nsuran:e and Rey. `state Services land uses within Building E, F and G; and a 9,365 square foot Recreational Facility for Star Fitness Center in Building E and issuance of Negative Declarati -n. B. surrounding Land Use and ?anin t ar n s r a ah •slness Park; General Industrial Subarea 3 South M vacant, industrial; Oeneral Industrial District 5ubz ry 3 East - School, residential; LtJw Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre), Medium Residential District (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) West - industrial; General Industrial District Subarea 3 C. General Plan Designations: r31ec to - General Industrial North - General Industrial South - General Industrial East Loa and Medium Density Residential West > General Industrial H i7EM D PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 87-13 - MULLER April 22, 1987 Page 2 D. Site Characteristics: The site contains the existK g In.piron mane ac ur ng wave Guse itidurtrial building, Buildings A, E, F have n c, feted while permits for Building G have been issued." All street improvements have been c..Wp etad along Archibald Avenue and :9th Street. E. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking. spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Re utred Provided Building E Office 3,265 x'250 13 13 Star Fitness 9,355 1 150 62 62 Building F Office 20,469 112so 82 82. Building G Office 20,469 1 126n 82 _82 TOTAL 219 219 11. ANALYSIS: A. General: On September 11, 1985, the Planning 'Commission approveT an 18.42 acre Master Plan for the development of 3 office buildings totaling 53,226 square feet and 4 industrial buildings totaling 159,704 square feet. It is the administrative /office t=ype of land use for buildings E, � and G that require the approval of the Conditional Use: Permit.. Phase I consisting of buildings A, E and F have been coma+:sted rect�ntly. On May 28, 1985 the Planning Ccamissfan gr.ante'd Design Review approval for Phase 11 consisting of buildings 8, C. D and G, where only building G has received a building permit. B. Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Service: The applicant is requesting to add toe fo ow ag i-m-&use—type to buildings E and F, Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Service. Staff Comment: The previously approved Conditional Use Permit (CUP 85-I4) allowed Administrative /Office type of land uses for Wildings E. F and G. These th?ee buildings; were, parked at a ratio of parking space per 250 square '.feet consistent with the T-�-A S PLRNNINP :!-W SSION STAFF REPORT CUP MULLER Apivil 22, 1987 Page 3 Development Code. A total of 219. parking spaces have been provided ''b� the vicinity of buildings E, r ane ,as shown in Exhibit "E" The parking ratio for the FinanL,.a(, Insurance and Real Estate Service uses is also one parking space per 250 square feet. Therefore the number of parking spaces is adequate It serve both the Administrative /Office uses and Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Service uses. Furthers the proposed uses are similar in the nature of operation to the Mmlinistrative /Office use, and world be compatible. Staff rj recommends that the Finawcial, Insurance and Real Estate Service uses be approved for buildings E, r and G. C. Recreation Far`7.1ty Star Fitness ,. ;enters The appl i), ant is also reques n�- a;a; ow a square Pot fitness cente, ack with ancillary uses s as tanning booths, child care., snart:_ and juice bar, cosmetology services (facials, nails) and a boutique in building E. 'According to the owner of Star Fitness Center, Pis. Lynda Unger_ 'tneir business hours are from 6:00 a.m, to 10 :00 p.m. Monday through Friday and 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Saturday through Sunday. The peak hours of operation are between 6 :00 a.m. to 9 :30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 10 :00 p.m. Monday through Friday and all day on Saturday and Sunday. Star Fitness G -ter has one full -time and four part- time employees. Staff Comment: 1. LanC ;Use. The Fitness Center is lensing approximately two- thirds 0 the floor area of Building E. Approximately 3,255 square feet are left on the north site of the building for offi— use which has not been leased or crcupied. Theref;:;•� the proposed Fitness Center will have minimum impact to the surrounding land uses. However staff is concerned with the amrAnt of ancillary uses such as tanning booths, cosmetola_yy services, child care service and boutique proposed in conjunction with the Fitness Center. The tanning booths, cosmetology services and boutique are class tied as Convenience Sales and Services which would require a Conditional Use Permit. Child care is provided for the convenience of customers and is not a commercial day care operation. Most riealth club /fitness centers do include seine ancillary services such as those mentioned above. These services are mostly catered to club members and not open to the general public. Therefore staff recommends that the percentage of the Poor area devoted to these ancillary servfzes sh6 yid be limited to 10% of the leased state in ,rder to en,:-"- 'rd- it will not impact the surrounding land uses. Any expansion of sucri ancillary uses should be subjected to further review by the Planning Commission. PLANNING COK4ISSI014 STAFF REPORT CUP 87 -13 - MULLER April 22, 1997 Page 4 r ' e. Parking. Parking,ratio for a health chub or fitness center -is one parking space per 150 square feet of gross floor area where a total of 62 parking spaces will be required. The remaining 3,255 square foot unleased space would require a total of 13 parking spaces. Exhibit "E" shows where the required .75 parking spaces are assigned for building E. PoweveF staff is concerned that some of the parking spaces are more than 400,feet away from building E. the reason being that most pedestrians would normally try to find the closest parking space to the building. Therefore, a conflict may occur during, the morning peak hours of 6:00 a.m. to D :30 a.m. between the office users, the employees from building H (Inspirou), and the fitness club members. During the evening peak hours the conflict between offic:: users and club merl',6rs may diminish somewhat as most offices are closed afte';'5:00 p.m. To address the parking issue, the applicant (id ler Company) has indicated that they are willing to modify the previously approved r -Rster Plan (CUP''85 -14) and Development Review (OR 86 -10) by eliminating the construction of buildings C & D to provide additional parking spaces as shown in ;:%thibit "F" This modification to.add parking spaces for employees of building H would relieve those spaces fronting along 9th Street for building E. Staff recommends that the applicant submit a Lidification to the Master Plan and the Development Review for .Planning Commission review and approval prior to occupancy release for the Star Fitness. Center. D. Environmental Assessment: Staff has completed an Environmental Check s and ha s a era ned that no sign.ricant adverse impact will occur as a result of this project in allowing Financial, Insurance and Real Estate ServiL:ns for buildings E, F and G and" allowing a Recreational Facility in building E. Further, a Negative Declaration has been issued for this approved Master Plan on September 11, 1985. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order for the Planning C.nnission to E approve s prodec facts to support the following findings must be made: 1. That a proposed use - f=inancial, Insurance and Real Estate Services, the Recreational Facility (Star Fitness Center) is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code and IndWrial Specific Plan, and the purpose of the district in which the site is located. D-4 PLANNING C#iMMtSSIAN STAFF RF.PORi CUP 87 -13 - MULLER �) April 22, 19$7 Page 5 f, 2. That a proposed use, together,,,'with conditions applicable l thereto, will not be d ^trill --ntal to the public health, safety, � or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or 1 a improvements in vicinity. Rf 3. That a proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the InOustrial Specific Plan and thc,Development Coda. IV. CORRESP.! QENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing n--TKe a___ y e art newspaper, the property posted, and notices sent" o alF prgrerfy owners within 300 feet of the project site..,' V. RECOMMENDAT f Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve it on Bona 7 'permit 87-13 and issue a Negative Declaration, Restfully submitted, lrad Bull City Pl adner W :NF:vC € Attachments: Letters from Applicant, dated April 8 and April 15, 1987' Letter from Star Fitness Center, dated April 14, 1987 Exhibit "A" Location Map Exhibit "B" Site Utilization Map Exhibit "G° Approved ,Master Plan Exhibit !'n' Summary Development Table fur Approved +� Master Plan Exhibit IV - Site Plan Snowing Vicinity of Parking Spaces Exhibit "F" - Proposed Amendment to Master Plan Exhibit "C" - Floor Plans for Star Fitness Center Resolution of Approval wit,' Conditions _ T `.! r r Suit Archibald Suite 209 Rancho Cucamonga Ca13'ornie 91730 (714 ) 550-5150 April 8, 1987 Planning Department CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG1 9320 Baseline Road, Un£,t 'D' Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ATTN: Nancy Fong Planner Dear Nancy: We are submitting for a non - construction conditional usC permit for Phase I of Rancho Technology Center located on the northwest corner of 9th Street and Arq.hibal:d Avenue. This Phase currently has a permitted usage of General. Indust al per DR86- 10,,with a C.U.P. 87 -13 for ddoduistrative and Office _max buildings E and F. We request the addition of the following conditional uses: 1., Financiajr XmSurxsce -and Zeal Estate Services for buildings E 2. Recreatlonal Facilities for building E consisting of r 9,365 tsar& ffeest. The abundance of existing parking more than compliers with the above request and the construction of Phase II will concu,erently comply pending the approval of the above request. Sincerely, Ch i Talkington P operty Manager Inland Division E April 15, 1987 Ms. Nancy Fong CITY OF RANCHO CU'CWNGA PLANNING DIVISION D.a. BOX 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91790 -0807 BE: PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USr PEMW i? Dear Nancy: CI7V OF RANCHO CUCAMOPI3A BANNING OIVISIoN APR 15 1937 PU Per your request I have enclosed a site plan highlighted with Star's Fitness Centers' proposed park3.ngcalculaited at ona (1) space per every 150 square feet. The approved use of these buildings verses the proposed use of Star's is only a matter of 25 additional parking spaces. Oar intention is to eliminate buildllga C & D'from Phase Ii to allow additional parking, not onby,.:*br Starfik:but also .for future tenants. We believe to add sdd#t = to-'any. parking concerns, 54 to 75X of the_ ffic is generated after 5 p.m. and uekeaiiich eraaiyarallg off hours to huildinga H, F & G's futurst "d cutr ' ly 'oecupled parking; needs. If I can•be of any further assistance to you or if you have any questions please don't hesitate to call. Sincerely,2' c 1 lkiaarty Manager /Inland Division cc: Steve Muller NEW 867;q Archibeld • Rancho f' Ucamonga. CA 91730 (714 ) 980.6212 (7f4) 980-6548 Al April. 14, 198? f 110 WHOM THIS MAY CONCERN; Star's Fitness Center which has been located in the �`. city of Rancho Cucamonga for the past 5 years is request- M ing a conditional use permit for the 8678 A- ch1bald A:• e- i I address , Star's Fitness Center employs one full time employee and part time employees. Our business hours are 6 am to lb om Monday thru- Friday. Saturday and Sunday from y am to � 4 Dm. Star's Fitness provides )lerobic Classes•, weight training, 'canning booths, child care, snack end. juice bar, ccsmotology services and a botique. Our main hours of oi,zration is between the hours of 6 am till 9:30 am and 4 n:n till 10 70m Noonday thru Frifay and of course all day'` on Saturday and Sunday, being we cater mostly to the business j person who usually homes in before or after work, fie also ! are considering making the new location more of a private, limited membership club so we may better serve our members in the way they are used to being If there are any questions pl�±ase feel free to call me. Healthfully, -- .- -Lynda L. Linger / -'"""- O! ner Star's Fitness center �`•� ,i. �. \fit'•. Y w �:F« w p� ' ', ^r ��:• �'� . .. � £r. h �`1 qyy A LIO N MA'' MUTYLEEN Gy utwen Z212.09= .-X- w NORM CrrY OF rrEm.- RANCHO (A)CAMONGA, TrrLE- F—ANNit\r, DivisioN EXHIBIT: t ♦♦ `F iyr'vY.�LeainU]wV"/r 4 •V7fr_r- �...•...�� 1 � j; ��� ` • yMw4`I.oMM �9�1 �w-� �' 1 r � V��� z♦ G� 't � s v.[ .t +r��Y � A tit B pit lift t f4 .. r � } y 1 of .a — �. » , Isi• WiMgk,. _ t y�» yr;v� PART !I UNIFORM APPLICATION z NON - RESIDENTIAL PROJ SUMMARY DEVELOPMENT TAB FFYJ FFI Fez R61 Iftl Project Name RANCHO TECHNOLOGY CENTER - PHASE TWO Reference Fite No.: Location ; N.W.C. OF ARCHIBALD AVE. S 9TH ST. (Staff Use oRiy1 General Plan : GENERAL INDUSTRIAL Development District, SUBAREA 3 PROJECT ARC - Grass (Incl. area to centeriine of abutting streets); acres: Net (exclusive of dedication for major external and secondary streets): acres: 1$•42 ACRE AREA DISTRIBUTION (tls"d on Altrt A n4 AC:R980€.FT-. %OF NET AREA Building Coverage 319,969 SQ. FT. 40% Landscape Coverage 168,603 SO. FT. 20% � Vehicblar Area (Inca. parking): 314,171.5 SQ. FT. 40% FLOOR AREA DISTRIBUTION BY PROPOSE DSE(am"dsup mo Am* Area of Building Pad No. of Stories Grass Floor Area (sq. ft.) Proposed Use BUILDING B: 31,964 SQ, FT. (FUTURE HEZZ: 9,000 SQ. FT.) 40,964 SQ. FT. - WAREHOUSE BUILDINC C: 19,1384 SQ. FT. ( FnTURE MEZZ: 6,000 SQ. FT.) 25..884 SQ. FT. - WAREHOUSE BUILDING D: 19,884 SQ. FT. (FUTURE MEZZ: 6,000 SQ. FT.) 25,884 $Q. FT. - WAREHOUSE UILDING G: 10,234 SQ. FT, (TWO STORIES) 20,469 30. FT. - OFFICE IU - S- 12, 410 SQ. FT, -• C?FFtM'- F= L7i SroRr�s} 20,464 U.rr- — CFWIcc PARKING . . N �i�E`in"�"Z: "�TdT"TErt"LG :IN TljBst; BT pe of Use i'ar n RR ff of Spaces Required boy S aces Provide p LDG B":,- OFF`ICCEE( 9mUGc0�SQ. FT 1 0 /250 ='p36ZCARS - -- - WAREHOUSE — 21,349 SQ. FT. @ 1/1000 = 22 CARS ------- - - - - -- 22 BLDG. C: OFFICE — 6,000 SQ. FT. @ 1/250 = 24 CARS ----- -- • - - - - -- 24 WAREHOUSE — 13,034 SQ. FT. @ 1/1000 = 13 CARS ------- - - - - -- 13 BLDG, D; OFFICE — 6,000 SQ. FT. @ 1/250 = 24 CARS ------- - - - - -- 24 13,034 SQ. FT. @ 1/1000 = 13 CARS --- •---- - - - - -- 13 BLDG. G: OFFICE - 20,469 SQ. FT. @ 1/250 82 CARS ------- - - - - -- 82 ftp4l 4 s OFFt <E - X, 9r.3 t asN s9 . �38&P 401 t9ft5 ei•os, . o+g wm r- = ref P1vy F : or+tca e1 0 ital NO. of Parking Spaces Required: PRASE ONE + PHASE TWO = 750 CAR S`•?AC$S Total No. of Parking Spaces Provided: - 780 CAR °PA(ZS No. of Compact Spaces 89 of Compact Space t4 101 Space z 11% 1)""141 a FFYJ FFI Fez R61 Iftl ,-a A a It Ud IV P It' V q 1-111, om u 00 an - Fri 4�7 r�' n!�mlmn .0 ' E-4 C 2 a anuafiv i Z � Z IIIIHIMMITI TQ WH = biD ao �� ed 0© WJIlIli.W,l 0. 11 YitH :s t AOO1GitlNalS Ltitti"`3'OHiHHKl t 9tfiHtti Wes°'" a Q `J O 0 �j d mi DPI I b ` `� s � O .gal l! l O 1 J j 0 I_ i' f t i ,_ — ,ova m wi.... •x `.' y. � ena.: ON 'C s iiii jyj " {'l 'lu ♦. f7� 3� =v Ili.. y5 {3S� *S i LZ i mi DPI I b ` `� s � O .gal l! l O 1 J j 0 I_ i' f t RESOLUTION NO. { A RESOLUTION OF Tf1E, R�4NcHo CUCAMONGA PLANNING Coif rssiQB APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 87 -13 FAR ADDITION OF- FINANCIAL, INSURANCE, REAL ESTATE SERVICES 'TD BUILDING - L; F AND G, AND 9365 SQUA ?E "FORT RECREATION' FACILITY (STAR FITNESS CENTER) FOR BUILDING E LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF M AND ARCHIBALD IM-THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL Di r"RICT - AAF.- ,209- 021 -16, 17, 05, 4 WHEREAS, on the 16th day of April, 1987, a comply a application was filed by the Muller toWany for review of the above - described project; and j WHCWS, 'tiff .the 22nd day of April, 1981, the Rancho Cucamonga project CoMeGion 'held a public hearing, to consider ty7c- tboi!e- described NOW, THER;�FORE, the Rancho .,+oamooga Planning Cd*fssion resolv=ed as follows: SECTION 1; That the foll ..'I,g findings can be past: j I. Th.It the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan,, the objectives of the Industrial &i- -ejfic Plan, and the purposes of the district in whic%, the I site i°, located. 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be ,ietrimental to the public health;, safety, or welfare. or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the 1 vicinity. l 3. That the prgosed use complies with each 0 the j applicable provisions of the Development Coc and the industrial Specific Plan. Jt4`tION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the 1 environmenT an at a Negative Declaration is'issued on April 221 1987, SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 87 -13 is approved subject to-B-FfMowinq conditions: PLANNING DIVISJoil I. This Conditional Use Permit is approved for Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Services for buildings E, t: and 1 G only, Al". other uses shall be subject to the land use � regulations as listed in the Subarea 3 of the Industrial Specific Plan. I 1 Resolution No. CUP 87 -13 - Muller April 22, 1987 Page 2 i 0 BY: Larry T. McNIel, Chalvwn ATTEST: - 'Bra cTTU er, Deputy edo ,a= ry I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of nand.,, Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Ranch- ',camonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22,, .ay of April, 1987, by the following vjte -to -wit "YES: COMMISSIONERS: 2. This Conditional Use Permit is also approved for a 9,365 COMMISSIONERS: square foot recreation facility (Star Fitness Center) ir. COKMISSIONERS: building E only. Any €xpanf`son of the use and /or intensification i�f the use shall require modification to t4is Conditional Us6�Permit to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Cortmi,,ion regardless of ownership of the use. 3. The developer of this p4oject,. Muller Company, shall submit a modification to the previously approved Master Plan and •Design Review (CUP 85 -14 and DR 86 -10) for Planning Ct mmfission review and approval, prior to rel ea3e j of occupancy for Star Fitness Center, f I.. The ancillary uses to the recreation facility that include tanning booths, child _ care, 'snack and juice bar, cosmetology services a Od a boutique shall not excee�__10% of the leased gross floor area of �e recreation facility in building E. Any expansion 6-such ancillary uses would require a separate Conditional Use `ermit to by : ^eviewed at :d approved by the Planning Commission. I AMk APPROVLi AND AAOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF APRIL, 1587. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE;ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNIel, Chalvwn ATTEST: - 'Bra cTTU er, Deputy edo ,a= ry I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of nand.,, Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Ranch- ',camonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22,, .ay of April, 1987, by the following vjte -to -wit "YES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COKMISSIONERS: i �rj�` r DATE. TO• FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GUCAM,0 STAFF REPORT' 4c�' ''��� April 22, 1987 1977 0airman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Pianner Nancy Fong, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERM) 87- 10 BARMAKIAN - TMe request far a Master CoaditiunaT_Lfse Permit to —allow administrative offices, professional/ design services, financial, insurance and rea'i estate services, within an existing multi- tenant industrial park in the 4.�.neral Industrial District (Subarea 1), located at the s0 thkst corner of Vineyard Avenue and Arrow Route APN 207- 261 -49. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: Action Requested. - Approval of a toaster Conditional Use Permit to arrow administrative offices, professionalldesrign services, . financial, insurance ad real estate services, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. SurrouAdin2 Land Use anu Zoning: rTorth - ondominiu`ms; Medium esidential District (8-14 dwelling units /acre) South - Industrial; General Industrial District Subarea 1 East - industrial Building; General Industrial District Subarea 2 'Vest - Cucamonga Creek ;General Industrial District Subarea 1 r. General Plan Designations., Project Site - General Industrial North - Medium Density Residential South - General Industrial Fast - General Industrial :Jest General Industrial D. Site Characteristics: The multi- tenant industrial pork and the im ni -ware ouse including perimeter landscaping and the required street improvements have been completed. ITEM E PLANNING COMMISSIOiV STAFF REPORT' CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -10 - BARMAKIAN April 22, 1981 Page 2 -17 '; n Asph F Parking Calculations for the Multi - Tendnt Industrial Park: Number of N,14mber of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Proy dde 5 Multi- TRi.riant R. "$s. Totaling 56,890 1/40C 142 191 II. ANALYSIS: general• On September 26, i984, the, Commission approve Conditional Use Permit 84 -27 foi- development of five multi- tenant industrial buildings, a mini- warehouse facility with caretaker quarters, and a gas station on 11.3 acres of land as shown; in Exhibit "B ". Both the five - multi- tenant industrial buildings and the mini- warehouse facility have been completed. The gas station site and the parcel iocated at the corner of 9th Street and Vineyard Avenue are still vacant at this time. The applicant is requesting for a master Conditional Use Permit to allow the following uses within the five zompleted' industrial buildings: o Administrative and Office Use o - Professional/Design Services o Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Services According to the applicant, one of the reesons for requesting a Master CUP is to save unnecessary time and money for processing individual Conditional Use Permits for each prospective tenant whose use may fall into one of the above- described categories. Another reason is that the design, of this project is of a "higher end" which attracts more of the office park users than light industrial or warehousing types of users. Furthermore, the applicant stated that Building 500 is particularly designed for office uses since no roll -up doors have been provided. B. Parking Issue: The total gross floor area for the five industrial buildings is 56,890 square feet. The Industria Specifi; Plan requires a parking ratio for multi- tenant use where the office portion is less than 35 percent of the leased space at 1 parkiny space per AWIL 400 squarz feet of gross floor area. Therefore, the total number of required parking spaces for this project is 142 spaces. The site plan shows a total of 191 sparking spaces have -- PLANNING COMMISSION S WF REPORT CONOITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -10 - BARMAKIAN April 22, 1987 Page 3 been provided, leaving 49 "extra" spa,:es (see Exhibit "c"); The following table shows a summary and break down of Vie leased space and the number of parking spaces provided. Number of Number of Square Parking Spaces Spaces Footage Ratio Required Provided__ Leased & Occupied 23,152 1/400 63 64 (Office Portion) (3,500) (11250)) (Industrial) (19,652) (1/400) Leased & Unoccupied 15,369 46 46 (Industrial) (6,000) (1/400) (Research) (5,633) (1/350) (Office) (3,746) (11250) Subtotal 109 110 Unleased Wits AWL Tenant Improvement Proposals 3,4911 (1f -50)* 14 Unleased With No Tenant Imprt� vement Proposal 13,871 (11250) 56 Subtotal 17,369 70 81 Total 179 191 * Assumes "worst case" parking ratio based on office, professional/design, or financial use.. In reviewing the above table, it shows that 81 parking spaces are available for the balance of the unleased floor area of 17,369 square feet. If this amoun4 of square footage is being leased out for office type of use, the total number of parking spaces required at a ratio of 1/250 square feet is 70 spaces. Therefore, the site has adequate parking spaces for office type of use such as administrative and office, financial, real estate and insurance services, and professional /design services. Staff reconc� ends that the entire Building 500 up to a maximum of 26,000 square feet of gross floor area should be approved for office use (5,633 square jolk feet • Tetra Pak, Inc.; 3,796 square feet - professional services; OW 17,000 square feet of unleased space). CO3 PLANNING CO MISSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87-10 - BAR AKIAN April 22„ 1587 Page 4 C. Land Use: The following are definitions of the three land use types that tha applicant is requesti,R for in the existing industrial park: o Administrative and Office, Activities typically RC ude, ut are not 'limited ,to: Ekkutive management, administrative, v clerical uses of private, profit orientated firms other than public utility firms.. Uses typically include, but are not litalted to: Corporate headquarters, branch offices., and data storage centers. a Professional /DesignSer__v__i_ces: Activities typically include, out are not limited to: The provision of advice, design, information, or consultation of a professional nature. Uses typically include, but are not limited to:. Architects, engineers, "lawyers, and accountant offices, and a planning or educational research service. Uses may include advertising offices and work activities. o Financial Insurance and Real Estate Services: Activities typically include, but aro not limitid to: Financial, insurance, real estate and securities brokerage services and banks. A review of the above description of these three land use types indicated that the nature of the business operation would be very similar and would not create conflict or adversely impact one another. D. Pur ose and Intent of Conditional Use Permit: The purpose of onditional Use Permit is to create flax i ility necessary to achieve the objectives of the Industrial Specific Plan. Selected uses in each district are allowed only subject to the granting of a Conditional Use Permit because of their unique site development requirements and operating characteristics which may require special consideration in order to operate in a manner compatible with surrounding uses. Tie Conditional Use Permit process is intended to afford an opportunity for broad public review and evaluation of these requirements and characterif -tics, to provide adequate mitigation of any potentially adverse impacts, and to ensure that all site development regulations and performance standards are provided in accordance with the Industrial Specific Plan and the Development Code. £ -d b PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -10 - BARMAKIAN April 22, 1987' , Page 5 The applicant is requesting for a master Conditional Use Permit_ to allow administrative office use, professional /design services and insurance, financial and real estate services. By allowing a )master Conditional. Use Permit, the Planning Cgmmissiun :fill be setting a precedent for the entire City in allowing "blanket" types of 'Conditional Use Permits. A Master Conditional tke Permit may diminish the opportunity for broad public review and evaluation to ensure that the�use would not have a Jpotential advers5,, impact to the surrounding I uses. However, in reviewing the _t' a of uses being r9 osed for this mastery Condiitiona Use Per m a are c Ts—el related M _in nature of their business operation w is wou� no`d t :m�act� one another. urt er, as discusse to previous sections, the site shows sufficient parking spaces to accommodate additional , R office use. _ E. Environmental Assessme�it: Staff 'has completed an environmental ZKekklist an eterm neat. that no significant environmental impact will occur as a result of this project for allowing a master Conditional Use Permit. Further, a Negative- Declaraticn Ask has been issued for this project on September 26,'19£4. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order for the Planning Commission to approve this project, facts.-to support the following findings must be made; 1. That the proposed use - administrative and office use, financial, insurance, and real estate services, professional /design services - is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Sode and the Industrial Specific Plan and the purpose,of the district in which the site is located. 2. That tiia proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious tc properties or improvements in the Vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan and the Cevelopment Code. I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE,'2ERMIT 87-10 BARMAKIAN April ??, 1887 a IV. CORkSPONDENCE' '•,This item has been advertised as a public hearing i- The Daily--R e'apt Newspaper, the property posted, and notices were sent= to all 'prvperty owners within 300 feet of the project site. I V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve oGcn itional Use Permit: 87 -10 and issue a uc,gative P' Declaration. Respet,,zfdlly su mitted, r .`' /r4a� ul er ty Planner F BB:NF:te Attachments: Exhibit "A" Location Map Exhibit "B" - Approved Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Detailed Site plan Showing Exact Number of Parking Spaces Exhibit I'D" - Existing Uses and Corresponding Leased Suite Exhibit "Ell List of Leased and Occupied Users Exhibit "F" - List of Leased and Unoccupied Users Resolution of Approval witz Conditions 1 E. PLANNING Cpl`�MISS;p ROOM CONDIT Page 1522NA1987USE PERM TA87_I�POR A RMAkIAN toe applicant is allow re services and admin]St.,,..1pg or a mast allowing a insurance, f e office use Conditional Co,--' ission master Co nancial and ' Profess- se Permit a, IL )i g , �bT rll be nditiora, real estate S7Onai /design Public °na1 Us�ePertyp s� of Condit Precedent for the t ervtPlanning have ,review anH — - may ej oval n.- - entl�. in ,r d 60ndi W -• Q(- no "C'.e0 an has been rssued f as a result of significant environmental this result Further is Project fOenv' al III. FACTS FOR Pro environmental be approve made: t rs FINDINGS. In Order On Setember 26, 1984 clarat On f I for the nni I. use t the Pro O is to support the following f� tl Ss' n to financi p sed use n9s must Pr ofessionalal' insurance administrati General Plan serv•3 and real ve and of the dish 1ndustr�ai °SJectiveS of is n ac ord t ices, 2. That the ct in whichpthefsite as and thelpur nt Cthe e1e aPPlicabl PrOPased use located. Pose of Public healthereto, wiljogether with vieinitus t0 Pro pert., or we f detriathe a,nditions 3• That the Perties Or or or n materially applicable proposed us rn the and the OeyprOyisio ice complies each or th elopment the Industrial Specific Plan !9 El SU A ,< ' _ f CiliCULATION I 920' R.O.W. 100' R.O.W. 88' or less R.J.W. RAIL tiERVICE -i--i--r-i- Exlstatg --I--i-++-F- Proposed TRAILS /ROUTE: 0000 Pede-, -man 40000 Bicycle Regional Multi-Use L.J Bridge Access Faints Qd ha VF 0 400' 800' 1600' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAANIONGA PLANTNM DIVISION tea " -- Creeks & Channels Parkt Special StraOtscape. .s4 Landocaping NK)RTH ITEM: Ar TITLE. EXHIBIT SCALE: A = �— i L n t ��- `�• „ `Dim i I� 1� NORTH . ��' � . �� A j •ate_.. � a II[ � i ' ,1 o Cr Y OF iTEia: , RANCHO CUCA TMOi TGA TITLE. _ PL.ANI'JM DIVISION EXHIBIT. — SCALDS "'"°' "u dp n u 3Ino 5.._ MOUHv i J.; s1 in r b u b ° 11 .51 Ob ZE w .6L Z •,QadC -A S t m Q C N •N 111 � 56 o � yyt {�{�� vai Q1 sn s I t +rlml v_ t, m N V oN QB S b - Zx .i2 (�Irl ,561 •,6 61 ds -S,Te Q4 :n II' itt Vs a 1 _ 400 QN � � � rRT � ' � •■f T ) t In __Y 'm uJ O N f�W alp �•< •,5119 dg-Of ,BZ .k Of ,6Z 6d4 a 9 �1 n�m j< > y m it o ti Y)� \ tFt •.G s1 dS -FkLI _Q'B '-1€' 11 we! ��/•• ` p�. X16 1 I E t ,I [.. ' I q W O7 qM. , �4 cc Ito co n h N s <a k ' 'lair .05.1 ,OI- ,0£ ,Ofl 1 GI Luv rmi �a O•i 0 t .,6.d dS 91 r :5� ,06 ,12 MI a ,6 d6 � ,6:.t .Qf ZQ •g P i t..L:..�2 . ,6 N O 1 f —11V 7Qe Ar Ir a f - Z QVa4 O Ir- C,4 ft V. .14 —3 f nt 0 cl ui UA to ........... w n. Lu (a M (j) Ui < GI w bL = A. LLJ 0 C: ........... .tea p W Y W Y dY U Y Ua Y N q 4 owl w an n M w W d W u 0 W W , �co lu tj at a w w �n in is N N � x w N H f m ° a6i cm LU z 16 W p 10 cM a K u a w w N o w a v o o v rn o o t� CD W ix CL t al v W tj a �+ A va q V o f d Y rg U OCIS IL N N N Y K7 e L W Y N W�.. L W Y W 47. C= Z 4 a W ' C L V- N y C q to a V W u M}} M. uC YM o C. G ai 3`Vd a M L... _ y,, C u Y u V u a .4 tt Y. a O a+toN m C Qa w0 j c0 W O Y Y a q t.3 C :1 •, 3C U O U W ..— U W 4 7 N N Mt Cp.i C`� uu �G• w «.. ELY ►�wtn Q i0 q wv V' a < a»+ S. ov ac 62 4W�ra moc a. �- cmo, Da Q}i N V L ?4 • t1 y Y W Z W C�ir y w .� .w H N if lQ tD C� .d a rA a o r.. at v '.. <� a u a m m °m A yl ql NN fH tl -M •y M,: m 1!! UI N N. L•1 Ln V1'. r.. � za , all v m to M m ae 14 tQ w m • -1 A ,a E! 0 E7 N W N EI ... •., n. m m a Q m •.1 X k m Q U 0 A O OO O O co �WW W u:Ut L7 V.w W Ya � 0 M in m CI m - L O Cn O O to 0 O O CT 7 cl a' v a c 4 � c ar .0 ..Vi - C %^ •.�� 1+. CAT W Y N N N ca ..e E) it a aT 3C A PT a G -1 E IE t - 410 d0.. to C w W. EI L 83 L Ca, 7' El P7 CT Ca. Cu, 7 C d 0 to K1' m vm in E) mC- 73 ca «� E> d: EPA atik Ej CQ:. m a iTm Um- +P 7 '0 Q '0 Ei ? r0 3 aj C7 A C N O of tn.. W m E1 A > O ... tS 0 r0 r0 4 �, Cl C.0 'H ,^�. 40 C9 L aP N 3 yN m,E) .0 :m0 a d. gi +.� :T v+ ..a Ot u $ H% W' +T '0 Ei ET c A Q E E 3 L .Q'^I It a A .^- a, 07 t) L' C O E E m ST m M L 1 L W r m N E In M • m il. tl ..a a C•.• m 7 •� > 0 4 S J m A A m L JT E m l aO s r+ -R � C7 II '�•! { 7 CW tEY I 0 um ' morn O 7 m4 ca .C' A• w-2 I I "I N M N c va" . J -D .d N to qp y ` v to .i. a CI 0 a 04 : e N 6T 114. o v' a < o ^f. a C .. w � .•t cal a - � �' s:D ;., 7' a � m 6 a y d d d UZ CD � a y v 5 4jN m rj G C s COO, 24 W4 �.� U7 G 4 a, U E N a C7 G1 W d rn ow y Y L T N C a C a Gca 4 j.. q� C L C •.r 3 8+ 40 ato obi am a o o flv U Om C61 OC E E - E+ fly o� ml ,°r+ t a N N N N N N a U U ri U U u U a v N '77 N N m N m FL U v O U a- C. ri ro >a cu W e• W W !.+ W W k. W W W 01 Ul 'U) 'f a •- [G Q G ,!l c 1i H 7 m C ID C b P ��{ (T .-1 [ U) UA,. U1 _ a .'F'� R m ¢ f0 ti �1 u m•+ m v V E m n a' N Z ui ca H H. 7 El 0.p W U W to W W O � 4r �E "3 U of d ta [�2 a H. d W E a rWf 2 ¢.. -..0 N G m a w a m z 4f* = W. a a �h -•+ ,+».� U•.f C ..2 m Ui a. ¢ 7 H W UJ R v ❑. c> N H H G` c f9U Of f•f k -.+ . W ❑ V E ..7 W 2 U ❑ L'3 5� N Cf 1 t m .a W d d G .•'7 W W W 2 H i'. U1 > > C 0 Ul to h ¢..s a >i ar Y v X •w •.r m 2 W ¢ b 0 lc:,. C. X m j"�A•" Au 'a w a wn .ca❑ x. sc d A Z k S. !L 4' R C .•{ W 6a 2 0. E W ii 11. E G �! Q. 7 o-I W •.. t •H @ R •.1 7 a2 J r 7 W W •2 z u a a s Co 7 i. [- E a J d 0 !a. Gt a U U .0 Q •< U ¢ ¢ ❑ ¢ ¢ U1 0 r1 .. 4 !a >v to O. ++ m a 4. Cf dN U E E¢ E F U S F W d C d G a uaa mda m G su a C. a au W 0= Y�. fl. Er 3 w 3 C: E FK. C W W E. H E tf1 E E a {Y. E C. ?. k O p � � yYC \ hT � 4� a w ; r In ,'a°' Ie - RESOLUThN N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSIOt! APPROVING 6NDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 8? -10 FOR 26,000 SQUARE FEET, OF ADMINISTRATIVE JFFICE USE, PI:OFESSIONAL/ DESIGN SERVYCE&AM FINANCIAL, INSURANCE ",,, RD REAL ESTATE SERVICES LOCATEO,....AT THE SOUT<iWEST CCkNLR OF VINEYARD AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE IN .J`!E 6�NERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT iiHEREAS, on the 9th day of ;April, 1987, a complete application waF filed by The Barmakian Company for review of the above - describe project; and WHEREAS, on the 22nd. day of April, 1987, the Rancho - Cucamonga Planning Commission held- a public hearing to consider, the above - described project. follows:. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Cosrnission resolved as SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in 'atcerd with the General Plan, the objectives of the In " 'dustrial Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in.which the site is located. 2. ':hat the ..proposed use, together with the conditions applical)''le thereto, will not be detrimental to the publ;f health, safety, or welfare, or m Cerially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. S. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Industrial Specific Plan. SECTION 2: That this project will not. create adverse impacts on.the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on April 22, 1987. SEC —?ON 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 87 -.LD is approved subject to tie � owing conditions: Planning Division 1. This Conditional Use Permit is approved for administrative/ office use, professional /design services ano final ;cial, insurance and real estate;!services only. All other uses shall be subject to the land use regulations for Subarea 1 of the Industrial Specific Plan. 03° y ' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -10 - BARWATAN April 22, 1987 Page 2 1 2., This Conditional Use °ermit is approved for a maximum of 28,000 square feet for those three uses as listed -in Condition 1. APPROVED ANO_.ADOPTEO T11S 22,ND DAY OF APRIL, 1987, PLANNING COMMU$,SION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO_NGA c: BY: Larry T. McNie l, Cha` man ATTEST: ra u er; De' i e 3 iecretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Plann,iny Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolutiors was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the :Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Comaiss%on held on the 22nd day of April, 1987, 'by the following vote -to -wit: AYES- COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: t i I I J i 3; 2 ---- -- CITY OF'RANCk O CUCAMONGA. STAFF REPORT DATE: April 22, 1987' T7, Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROK: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Greg Cage, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONNERTAL ASSES NT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -08 CUUMNGA C RISTIXR FrECONSKII, - 1k proposal to esta5lish three classrooms and a'jnu r - purpose room for an existing church within 'the General District (Subarea 4) of the Industrial Specific Plan located at the northwest corner of 7th Street and Archibald Avenue - ;APN 207»171 45 I. BACKGROUND: At its O -eting on Julj 10, 19P5' the Planning 'omm ss on approved Environmental Assessment and Conditional Use Permit 85 -16, establiafcing a church use within an Industrial ' ,,ark located at the northwest corner of 7th Street and Arch&rbald Avenue. the church has beer operating within the facility located at 9050 Archibald Avenue' since that time, and has complied with all applicable conditions of approval. II. KOJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Re Vested: Approval of a Nonconstrvction Conditional sif a Peermit to est ablish lures classrooms and a multi - purpose room for the Cucamonga Christian Fellowship at 9034 Archibald Avenue. S. Surrounding 'toning c nd sand Uses: North b0 area 4. wit lows-7rHoTessional Cer.tQr South - Subarea 4, Vacant East - Subarea 4, CCWD Pump Station West - Subarea 4, Industrial Warehouse C. General Plan Uessi�g_n_ations: Project ' ene -�` raTiiid'ustriai North - General Industrial South - General Industrial East Genera] Industrial West General Industrial I ITEM F x lfen;: COMM.ISSIOk STAFF ' 7 REPORT CUP'87 =08'- Cucamonga Christian Fellowship April 22, 1,987 I Page. 2 ,1. Site Characteristics: The proposed use fs� 7oc3u`ed •fith;n an exist ng tau . industrial aR warehousing "',b4usiness "G" d park. Building i >cludes a variety,6f retail and industrial i uses, a mediccl office and the existing church facility. IIL. ANALYSIS: I A. General: The Cucamonga Christian Peilowshi! ,s'propasing to Use an additional 1;'920 squat fe-�:t of tenant space ,within � r Building "G ",( which has a totag f ='nor.; area of 25,728 square feet. The p�rdposal entails establishing 3 childrens classrooms and a multi- purpose roast for edocAtional and meeting activities Ancillary to the church use. 1hi- church is proposing to use '+ the classrooms from 8 :45 a.m. to 12 :45 p.m. on a:ndays, and the multi- purpose room from 6:30 p.st. to 5 :00 p.m. on 4uesday, u Wednesday at,d Th,�rsday nights. These hours are consistetut with th(' 'approved hours of operation for the church. An important issue surrounding this type of proposal is the availability of on -site parking. This site was developed and Parked at a ratio one ( 1) space for every 207 square feet of building area. Although parking availability adjacent to Archibald Avenue is limited �q t15 spaces, staff believfa 'that an adequate 4munt ',of arking`,.is available on other areas of the site. Specifically there €sre 148 spaces within 250 feet _ of the churchrunit, of which 122 are requirod for the main assembly area of the church. The Development Code requires tht churches provide parking at a ratio of one i1? space for oach 35 square feet of gross floor area within a main auditorium; if there ere no fixed seats. This standard includes parking for ancillary church areas, such as offices and classrooms. Thus, the estatMshmedt of classrooms and a aulti- purpose room is not expected to significantly increase parking demand, since the majority of individuals using such facilitier would be children or adults already attending he church. To date, no parking " conflicts have occurred betweed the church -and othe- retail uses within the center. B. Envirowiental Assessrvent: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed pp 'i Gant. Staff. has eomgleted by the appli, :ant. Staff has c. plated Part II of thn Ef:vironmental { Checkl,st and found no significant impacts on the environment as a result of this project. k F aZ I �1 i. PLANNING COMISSi'ON STAFF REPORT CUP 87 -08 - Cucamonga Christian Fellowship April 22,_ 1987 r Page 3 n k. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: 1. That the proposed use is in accordance with the General Plan, the objectives. of Development Code, and the purposes of the ' Industrial Specific Plan Subarea in w4ich ti M site is located, 2. That the proposed use will not be detrimental to the yoblic health, safety, or welYare, or materially injurious to, " properties or improvements in the" vicinity. 3. That the proposed ust� complies with each of the applicable r provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan. V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing to The Dally sport newspaper, the pr6perty posted and notices sent to 'a proper owners within 30O'' of the groject and to .Al businesses located fn Building ail ". NI. RECOh'eEIEMDATION: Based upon the above analysis and facts for G findings, s aFf recommends that the P anningi "Omission approk Conditional Use Permit 87 -08,, through. the ;issuance of a Negative: Declaration and adoption of tpe attached Resolution. Respectfully submitted 1 Bra Bui er - ! City Planner BB:GC:vC Attachments: Letter from Applicant £Ahibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" 'Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Flsor Plan Exhibit "D" tenancy of Bui l d, n9 " asi Exhibit "E" - Parking Analysis J Resolution of Approval i i i I i G ucamvarga C,� Eiitian s3etfocvsf i# 1�astors" Steve Atch Jaff Richa:d pick Hoover March 11, 1987. �s The proposed use of the building at 9034 Archibald aarenan will be for additional Christian education, office and for storage space the Cucamonga Ahristian Fellowship. 'The "normal: faci'iity would rarely be used during business hours. The Multi- purpose room will be used on Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday nights from 8;30 to 9:00 for various adult gatherings. On Sunday ;Horning from 8 :45 to 12:30 the proposed new addition would be used for primary and junior classroom space. The church currently has four full time pastors, a full time secretary And a ° *rt time bookkeeper. The cen- ter of operations ,will cc. tue to fours on the already approved 9030 site, so the proposed expansion of our facility will have little if any additional impact on the business park. ?he reason for s.Aecting this site is its close proximity to our existing ficility. Respectfully submitted Stephen P. 'Fitch Senior Pastor SPF:jer i i 9050 Archibald Ave. Rancho Cucamonga. CA 417?'7 • e �• j ti`'� a a� ��^ .. _. .. �J IL o J � m zo ry a w ! fr 1 i t is 4 L� .t ra m m m z �mi = m 0 q ( r v tr N b � C R G � r fJ G r N 3 G 7 R f7 :3 N R ySig�+ »S 4 tlfC% FaG %f% +{ rp m r ° r �•1 ARCHIBALTI AME";4E CITY 011". rrcm= ... T' Via. PLANNING DIVEMN EkHaT, . scALr= laA I 1w.1 4t3ow ' J Off .t ra m m m z �mi = m 0 q ( r v tr N b � C R G � r fJ G r N 3 G 7 R f7 :3 N R ySig�+ »S 4 tlfC% FaG %f% +{ rp m r ° r �•1 ARCHIBALTI AME";4E CITY 011". rrcm= ... T' Via. PLANNING DIVEMN EkHaT, . scALr= 9 f f MUI,.TI - PURPOSE ROOM .I L HALL 1 0 N i ARCHIBALD ENTRANCE V � 'Non r CITY Or. RANCHO CLrANIONGA Tir-E, �� tea. 1- PUNNING D[VuqoN �Htt3t'i : `• CITY Or. rrr RANCHO CUCADVIOWIA PLANNING DIVLS N M1MT,_.L1'Z.:-SC►LC=�.._. . TENANCY OF BUILDING "G" Archibald Avenue Address Business Nome Use 9016 California Occupational Medical Group Medical Office 9026 SK Submarine Restaurant 9028 Custom Compressor Systems, Inca Manufactari'ng 9030 Alplza Graphics #117 Retail 9034 Cuc,amonga Christian Fellowship Zlassro;m Multi- Purpose Room 9038 tlarts Pius Retail 9050 Cucamonga Christian Fellowship Church CITY Or. rrr RANCHO CUCADVIOWIA PLANNING DIVLS N M1MT,_.L1'Z.:-SC►LC=�.._. . RUIl.G11% "a`" PARKING ANALYSIS arce ; arce; ap . M Total 25,720 1/267 average 46 (1) Thee c° 4rch is limited to the use of 18 parking spaces durit.g reg 'a business hours per C.U.P. 85 -16. Additional spaces are `i:r church functions after 6:00 p.m. weekdays and, on weekends. (2) Multi - tenant industrial use ratio per I.S.P; CITY t F ,- :: 67-- 0 . .� Fi47 Sq. Ft, of Number Building Parking of Use Space Ratio Spaces Me4'tcal Office 4,100 1/200 L 20 Restaurant 2,000 1/100 20 Existing. Retail 4,200 1/250 16 lndustrial 2,,200 1/500 4 Church 71100 -N /A- 18 (1) Vacant Lease Space 4,200 1/400(2) 10 *Proposed Class- rooms, Multi - 7vrpose Room 1,920 -NIA- 8 Total 25,720 1/267 average 46 (1) Thee c° 4rch is limited to the use of 18 parking spaces durit.g reg 'a business hours per C.U.P. 85 -16. Additional spaces are `i:r church functions after 6:00 p.m. weekdays and, on weekends. (2) Multi - tenant industrial use ratio per I.S.P; CITY t F ,- :: 67-- 0 . .� Fi47 0701 - -02 o 4 -22 -87 IBC agenda 2 RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTInN OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING .COMMISSION APPROYINGJ XNDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 87 -08 iOR THREE CLASSROOMS AND A MULTI - PURPOSE ROOM LOCATED AT 9034 ARCHIBALD AVENUE IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the lith day of March, 1987, a complete applicatiot' : was filed by the Cucamonga Christian Fellowship for review of the above - described project; and i WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of April, 1987, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above- described pro3ccz. follows: NOW, THEREFORE', the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as SECTION 1: That the following findings can De met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan,, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. AL 2. t.au, the proposed' use., together with the conditions c.,Pp l'cabla thereto, will not be detrimental to, thl< public health, safety, or welfare, or materially iiJurious to properties or improvements in the V1 C, y'.1. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the Fvplicahle provisions of the Development Code. SECTION 2: That Conditional Use Permit No. 87 -08 is approved subject to- Tie- olTowing conditions: 1. This approval shall run with toe applicant and shall become void upon a change of ownership, or if the use ceases. 2. The site shall be developed in accordance with the approved plans on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and Industrial Area Specific Plan regulations. Prior to any use of the facility, all conditions of approval shall be completed to: the satisfaction of the City Planner and Building Officie�l. 3. Appvoval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the industrial Area Specific Pian, all other City Ordinances, and all conditions for Conditional Use Permit 85 -15. Planning Cowissi9r. Resolution No. CUP 87 -08 - CUCAMONGA CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP April 22, 1987 Page 2 4. Any signs proposed for this Conditional Use Permit shall Do: designed in conformance with the k" Comprehensive Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval by the Planning Division prior to installations ` S. If the ope'f•,, iW l' of this church causes adverse effects upon ai%-.;ent businesses or operations, the Conditional Use 6rmi t shall be brought before the Planning Commission for the consideration and f° possible termination of such mse. 6. Occupancy of the facility shall not commence until ! sucb time as all Uniform Building Code anu-�-S #ate Fir; Marshall's regulations have been complied with, Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Foothill Fire Protection District: And the Building and Safety Division to show cv flir;nce. The building shall be inspected for campll4 .;e prior to occupancy. `Y 7. The building „„ay be used for classes and meetings only during the weekend and after 6:00 p.m. on weeknights.. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF APRIL, 1987. PLANNING COM41SSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry—T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad-auller, Deputy 5ecretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Punning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a ragular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of April, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ��li CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA G�CAM© STAFF REPORT j�Q `�� 0 U Ih 1977 DATE: April 22, 1:987 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planni'ngyCommiss, ROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Debra Meier, Assistant Pl.inner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87-05 ITANCHU CUCAM NGA REALTY PrOPERTIES II LTD - A request to serve alcoholic averages within an established 3700 square foot restaurant within the Neighborhood Commercial District (NC) located at the northeast corner of 19th and Archibald (9740 19th Street)- APN: 202- 171 -57 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of Conditional Use Permit and fti>uance of a Negative Declaration B. Su,-oundin Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant and; Foothill Freeway and Low Residential (2- 4 dwelling units per acre) South - Condominiums Low- Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) East Apartments; Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) West - Vacant land; Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) and Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units der acre) C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Neighborhood Commercial North - Proposed Foothill F,eeway and Low Rrsidential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) South - Law- Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) East - Medium -High Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) West - Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) and Low - Medium (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) ITEM G PLANNI[i COMMISS OR STAFF (REPORT CUP 87 -06 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA FEALTY April 22, 1987 Page 2 0. Site Characteristics: Amici's Pizza N "ituff i located within an existing Neighborhood Commercial Shopping Center which includes, one major supermarket, a bank and three restaurants along with -other small specialty shops. The renter was developed under county standards and has recently undergone architectural facelift as well as additional landscaping, throughout the center. E. Applicable Regulations. ,Development Code Section 17.10,0305,56 states that restauronts with serving of alcoholic beverages vequires a Conditional Use Permit when located within the Neighborhood Commercial District. II. ANALYSIS A. General:, The applicant is requesting to add 900 square feet to t7ie xisting 2,800 square foot restaurant .along with, the acquiring of a general alcoholic beverage License.. The major issue related to the expansion of the restaurant is parking availability and the issue in regard to serving alcoholic beverages is compatibility with surrounding land use, -•d other existing tenant.`,. B. Parkins: The'toverall shopping center contains 304 parking spaces far 72,.Wp square feet of building space (1 spac per 238 square feel)). However, certain uses on, -site, incTudt q a fast food restaurant, two other restaurants and a c_.'' -•rch, have parking demands greater than that of .other typical retail uses. Specifically. Number of Type Square Parking Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Fi, Food Rest -!rant 5,600 1/75 75 Other, Restaurarn_s 4,300 1/100 43 Church 2,1001 1/35 602 General Retail 59 682 1/250 239 Total _Fe.tk -477 1 2,100 square feet of seating area, however, 3,000 square feet totdl church leased space 2 Needed Sunday mornings and two evenings per week only. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ' CUP 87 -06'- RANCHO CUCAMONGA REALTY April 22, 1987 Page 3 i Typically shopping centers are parked based upon cumulative,`; l: parking demands of each use, this center presently falls 113'' k spaces short of meeting this goal. The problem stemming from the fact that the center was originally parked assuming 100% retail use. Although the addition of 900 square feet of restaurant space would require only 5 spaces more than 900 square feet of retail space, it is adding to an already deficient parking count.. (For your reference, z simple analysis of parking based on needs generated during peak restaurant hours and has been included as Exhibit "E ".) C. Cornt,atibility: `The applicants do not intend to modify the existing , hours of ope ation (see exhibit D) nor their philosopny of operation, which has been that of a family restaurant. Therefore, there would be no exte)nai changes in the operation of the restaurant. Other businesses on -site ara also open to within an hour more or less of 10 PM including Stater Bras., Carl's Jr., Ice Cream Shop, China Garden and the 1".quor store. The property to the north is vacant and pr`anned for the Foothill Freeway. A single family house and horse corral are located to the noA;hwest, fronting on Archibald. Therefore it is not anticipatW that the granting of:this permit, which would allow the serving of alcoholic beverages as a part of the restaurant, would cause any adverse impacts. D. Environmental Assessment: Upon review of Part I of the Initial tudy and completion of Part II of the Environmental Checklist, staff has found no significant impacts related to the serving of alcoholic beverages for this restaurant. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The proposal to serve alcoholic beverages' within the existing 2,800 square foot restaurant is consistent with the Development Code. The proposed use, together with the recommended Conditions of Approval, will not be detrimental to public health, or materially injurious to the properties in the vicinity. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This itew has been advertised as a public ±easing -in a Daj ye ort newspaper, the property posted, and notices sent to a property owners within 300 feet of the parcel boundaries and all existing businesses within the shopping center. In addition, the project was forwarded to the Foothill Fire Protect -'on District for their review and comment. 6_3 PLANNING COMM1.46N STAFF.,REPOR t CUP 87 -06 - RANCHO CUCAM10kA REALTY April 22, 1987 Page 4 j� V. REC0WENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the. ConditionaY Use �u ernc t Or__ serving of alcoholic beverages within the cclsting 2,800 square foot eestaurant and issuance of a Negative Declaration. But staff° reccmeends denial of the IM square foot expansion of the re .tamrant pending submittal and analysis of a detail she ;red parkinl sti,dy, Respectfully tu 'ttedr Brad Bu er City Planner BBiDm:vc Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant Exhibit "B" - Locat;ioit Map Exhibit "C" - Site ,Flan Exhibit "D" - gist of Tenants Exhibit "E" - RestWlrant Peak Hours Erhibit "F" - Flamm Plan Exhibit "G" - Fimthi l Eire District Com nts Resolution of Approval with Conditions ConxQneckian Gtiroora� vaL a cis ia"`f f��^' � Division ., sue 23-: Rancho Cuc3monga, Ca6tcrnia 9173r, Telephone March '06, 1987 Mr. Christer Westman Assistant. Planner THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 9320 Baselinr Rd. Rancho Cucamonga, GA 91730 Re: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Amici's Pizza & stuff Restaurant 9740 1.9th. St., Alta Loma, California Dear Mr. Westman: Pursuant to requirement #4. of your standard "Check List for a Conditional Use Permit" we here -In respectfully submit this letter explaining in detail the propoted use or business operation... As many City employees are aware, Amici's Pizza & Stuff is a long time operating family restaurant serving many fine Italian dishes. As the existing business has been appreciated by the ccmmunity thereby offering the possibility of expansion, we desire to utilize a vacant 9A square foot space immediately west of the existing 2800 square foot,restaurant to enlarge the existing seating area of the restaurant. The decor of subject expansion would be consistent with the existing restaurant. In addition the expansion would provide a total of 48 seats within "booths " which the existing clientele greatly prefet. Further, an area for private group meetings would again be c£fered. Lastly, a on --Sale general ABC Class 47 Liquor License is requested to upgrade the existing beer and wine license. The placement of -:is license shall be solely incidental to the food service as a Gilded service to our existing clientele. We wish to strongly convey that no change in hours of operation or existing policies shall be made. In no event is it our desire to construct a "bar" atmosphere. Nothing could be less desirable to our existing policies of a family orientated community business. 1 Greco Construction CorporationA e — �y J March 06, 1987 ` 14r. Christer West�nan CITT OF R—ANCT '� CUCAMONGA Page 2- continued k Thanking you in advance for you review and consideration. ction Carpora';ian CAMONGA REALTY PRopEpTTES 1I, LTD. I1, :� izza & tuff A r. BJ : di ; cc file enclosure f i z E. LM, m CITY Or. rrr-M.- JgkE RANCHO CUCAMONGA lTrLE- PLANNING DIV510N IA:HIMT--.ff—SCALc:l'- &--I Noll'T llNi! 1�1 :OD: ; CMD cm , cam: cap t t co '� . ...• ~ i 'o.3 rul fi!'dC7lJa 1i 11's �Gr�arnr •��;JI . .—. . i Jam.$ + � - t C Y� NORTH CITY OF IT'--' ;t I�LP —40& RANCHO CUCAN IONGA TITLE: �glr —4AI PLANNING IXS'MN EXHIMT- C SCALE+ % [1'2— FL s '1 EXHIBIT D LIST OF TENANTS 19th Street Address Tenant Saturday Sunday Mon -Fri 9700 1st Trust Bank - - 10am -3pm S /lO Centuwy 21 Real Estat 9740 A -Rici's Pizza n Stu$lf 11am -llpm 11am -11pm 11a*-vpm 9750 Stater Bros, Market 8am -10pm Sam- 9 :30pm Sam -lopm 9756 Carl's dr.,' estaurant Gam- 10:30pm 6am- 10 :30pm 6am- 10,30pm 9760 Chsrkers Beauty Salon 9762 Tim & Country Gleaners Sam -6pm 7am -7pm 9764 Beneficial Finance - - 8 :30am-5:30pm 9766 Tessie's Card & Gift Shop 10am -5pm - loam -6pm 9770 China Garden Restaurant '4pm- 9.30pm 4pm- 9:30pm llam- 9:30pm 9776 Luthern Church, -, 9am.,11.4 30am 7 :30pm- 9pm 9778 Dentist Sam-lpm - 9am -6pm 9780 Best Video 11am -8pm - 11am -7pm 9782 Transamerica Financial - - Sam -5pm 9784 Fantastic Sam's Sam -6pm 10am -4pm gam-8pm 9786 Realty Plus 9788 Ice Cream and Yogurt llam -9;wm 11am -9pm 11am -9pm 9792 The Promise Christian Store 9:30am -6pm - 10am-8pm 9794 Town A Country Liquor 7am -12pm gam -IOpm 7am -10pm 9196 Donuts 5am -5pm - " %dm-5pm Sam -5pm 9798 Southwest Savings - _. 9am -4pm IPeak hj,urs noon and 7pm -9pm 2Peak - ".ours daily 4pm -7pm s Peak Restaurant Hours 7 PM - 9 PM Fallowing is -'an analysis of uses in operation been the evening hours of 7 PK and 4 PM to +ietermine the parking demand for all businesses operating during these hours.: Square parking Spaces Business Footage Ratio Required ired Carl's Jr.- 5,500 1/75 75 Amict's 3,700 1/100 37 China farden 1,5001 1/100 1�, Church 2,100 1/35 6a' Tce Cream 1,500/ 1/250 6 Liquor Stork 2,5001 1/250 10 State Beos. 24,400 1/250 97 Total 1 Maximum two evenings per week 2 This is not peak market shopping hours, therefore ;;,,, 1/250 will be a high estimate for th's time period. ��."`= .. :ski �p•,...".-- .— f—.t•� l� k T /es LL CI'T'Y o% RAI'CHO CUCAl�1O,'%YA PLANNING MWON NORTH I { Tnu, �--�- EXHIMT. SCALFE: iAV ' — — =RE.?CEIVED -- lC19Y OF RANCHO CUCAMOHM PLANNAM DIVISION A OR o tj Of �l�sys�sus��is`ti'1�!`�151s 1 s %.i �r FOOTHILL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 11 14EMORANDUM _ TO: Debi Meie::, Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department P OXt Susan D. Wolfe, Foothill Fire District SUBJECT: Amici's Pizza & Stuff DATE; April 6, 1987 Using the scale provided on the drawing, our ' cal,culatio4s come to a tata� lord of 53 persons, not including the possible eig'ihu�anr, iz that could E; be seated at the bar. This will require reclassification of the a^cupancy z from a & -2 to an A -3.' We don' serious zxts will . have to have the dead bolts remorrd , ,k d ' pavlc Lardware installed. Any window coverings or interi. -,)r fabrica and /or decorations will have tO be f!44h* ratardan`. I 6 treated. For your information, construction has 4troady been done in their existing suite, closing off to opening and creating another as I noted in reel. We did not get plans on this. — =RE.?CEIVED -- lC19Y OF RANCHO CUCAMOHM PLANNAM DIVISION A OR o tj Of �l�sys�sus��is`ti'1�!`�151s RESOLUTION TIC, XAESOLUTIOA OF' THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 87 -05 FOR THE SUVING OF AL09POLIC BEVERAGES IN CONJUNCTION WITH AMICI'S PIZZA IO "i`TUFF RESTAURANT LOCATED AT 5740 19TH STREET IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMR1ERCIAL DISTRICT - APH: 202 - 171 -57 WHEREAS, on the 10th day or March, 1987, a, complete application was filed by Rancho Cucamonga Realty Properties II, Ltd. for review of the above- described project; and WHEREAS, ors the 22nd `day of Apra 1987, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission' held a publie, hearing to consider the above - described project. follows: 8019, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as SECTION 1: That the following findings can*c be met:: j 1. That the proposed use is in -1ccord with tke General Plan, the objectives of the 'Development Code, and j tt.4 purposes of the district \in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be d2teimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, o, materially injuriov- properties or improvements in the vicinity.:, 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable previsions of the Development Code. SECTION 2: That this protect will not create adverse impacts on the environment an -dWat a negative Declaratton is issued on April 22, 19tt7, SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Pc - -rmit No, 8706 is approved subject t—o-5-a—T-oTTowing conditions: 1. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all applicable City Ordinances, Foothil' Fire Diatri,t requirements and C.blic Health codes. 2. Any modification, e.pansion or other change in operation will require a revision to the Conditional Use Permit. RESOLUTION NO CUP 87 -Oa - Rancho Cucamonga Rea'1ty April 22, 1987. `. Page 2. 3. All li age shall be designed in conformance with, the Comprehensive _ Sign' Ordinance and shall require review and approval by..tCie_Planning Divisiao. 4. The serving of alcoholic beverages must be in conjunction with restaurant usage. 5. she Conditional Use Permit is granted for an indefif,E #e time period. However, in the vent, that this use causes adverse effects on adja-.ent businesses or �rnpACti2s, the Cowf4sion may consider mvision�- or additions to any of ifie conditions- ,stated hereon. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 2290 DAY OF APRIL, 1987. PLA;NMdING COMISSION OF THE CITY of RANCHO CUCAK)NG.4 r Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary I. Brad Buller, Deputy., Secretary of the Planning C,o mission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,. do hey ^eby certify .nat the foreu ini5 Resolution was duly and j re9clarly introduced, passed, and adopted by Planning Counission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning G mmission held on the 22nd-day of April, 1987, by the f¢licwing v *te -to -wit: AYES: rOMISSIONVO, . r t NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT., COMISSIMRS:. CITY OY RANCHO CUCAMONGA ` STAFF REPORT DATE:. TO: FFVM: BY: SUBJECT: April E2, 1987 Chairman.dnd Members of the Planning Commission Arad Buller, City Planner Debra Meier, Assistant Planner y ENVIROMNTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 86 -C = _ a eve opm- or a truck ease, sa e sand maintenance faciMy on 4.23 acres of land in the Generp "-: Industrial,D s rict (Subarea 143 located on the west side of Santa Anita kvenue north of 4th Street APN: 224- 331 -0'. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: - I A. Action Requested: Approval of Conditionrl Use Perm-« and Issuance ance o'f Aeq, a Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: or - Vineyard; inau riaTSpecific Plan Subarea 14 ,outh - Vineyard; Industrial Specific Plan Suba ;,ea 14 East - Warehouse /Distribution Facility; Industriai Specific Flan Subarea 14 West - Day Creak Channel & Edisorr7ra.!smmission right; -of -way; Industrial Specific Plan Subarea 14 C. General Plan Designations ro ec roe - General Industrial North - General industrial South General Industrial East - General Industrial West - General industrial D. Site Characteristics: This site, as well as other undeveloped properties in this area, are Existing vineyards. Directly east of this site is a resentiy completed warehouse industrial project; abutt7rig the project to the west is the unimproved Day Creek Flood Control Channel. The site slopes gently in the southwestern direction at 2 -35 gradient. ITEM H PLANNING G0 4RISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 8$ -04 -Ryder April 22, 1987 Page 2 < E. Parking Calculations: k Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces r, of Use Footage _Rta_ Required Provided Office 4,700 1:250 19 e Shop 5y ; 1b0 1.500 12 Storage 1,400 1: 1001 O 1 Total 32 42 II. ANALYSIS, A. General: The intent of thi3 site, is for the renting, leasing, ui" eTTng,, maintainirga storing, :gashing and sale of Ryder Company trucks and trailers. They, proposed land !;se ht, been t classified as Medium Wholesale, S�.urage and Distribution: A; Conditional Use Permit is requir6d to allow retail sales t activities within a General Industri41Aistrict, B. Design Review, COW ttee: The Design Review Cdwtt;ee (hitiea, - W-ler rev w— R-Yffe project at th €ir meeting of February 19, 1987 making the following recommendations to be addressed in revised plans; 1. Increase, amount of landscaping along si>reetscaps including use of landscaped finger islands within parking ,lot and "additional areas for landscaping adjacent to the building face. 2. Place the outdoor lunch court near the office area of the building, using low profile galls and shrubs for screening purposes. 3. Enhance the building 1'ace by expanded use of spandrel glass and variation ir, the vertical building plane. 4. Tha screen avail along the Santa Anita streetscape should become an extension of the building architecture and receive a similar decorative treatment. S. Landscaping along the west property line shall be 24" box size evergreen trees for screening purposes: o PLANNING COMISSION lr STAFF REPORT CUP 86 -04 - Ryden r 'pril 22, 1981 r 'Page , 3 qW ` 6. Fencing along portions of the north and south) property r lines that must allow for drainage overflow must provide; security to the satisfaction of the property owner, screening to the satisfaction of the De,?ign Review t Ctimaittee and be structurally satisfactory to the tarty Engineer. _- The Committee "reviewed revised plan. on March 19, 1987 and recommended approval with the following conditions; 1. Split -face block and scored split -face block should be different shades of .color to prcyid( accent to the building face. The applicant h.5 provided material samples that reflect this- comment. , 2. The scored split -face vertical element on the south elevation should be thicker to present an element of greater mass. The applicant has made this revision to the final plans 3. The Committee stated once again that the fencing along portions of the porth,,and south property lines should -of include some type material that zan provide screening of views from Rh Street as well as the .Freeway. This material gust be to the satisfaction of the Design Review. Committee and the City Engineer. C. Technical Review Committee,, The Technical Review Committee has recomeMed approval of e project after lengthy discussion of the problems created by... the unimproved Day Creek Flood Control Channel. Since the possibility of flood overflow from the channel exists, the site must be designed to protect structures . yet at the svmte �2 t; it must provide a means for flood overflow to pass through the site fn a relatively unobstructed manner. The Technical Review Committee determined that with recommended Conditions of Approval the project is consistent with applicable City Standards and Irdinances. D. Environmental Assessment: Upon review or' Part I of the Initial StuU an comp etion o art II of the Environmental Checklist staff has found that although flooding is a potential hazard to the site, significant impacts have been mitigated satisfactorily -based on requirements of the Technical Review Committee. "NINE COWISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 86 =04 - Ryder April 22, 1987 Page 4 III. FACTS FOR., FINDINGS: This pry >ject is consistent with Industrial pec' c an an the General Plan. The project will net be d 'rimenta to adjacent properties- or cause significant et sir orunental impacts. In addition, the proposed site plan and bf;tlding design, together with the recommended conditions, are in cor¢9liance with the Industrial Area Specific Plan and City Standards. ` IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item hasibeen advertised as a public hearing' in a a y -Report newspaper,, ,the property sen o proper y owners within ;300 feet of he projecat site., notices t V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Conditional Use Perri t 76o-UT-a—nd issuance of -a Negative Declaration. submitted, *Respefully w BB:DM:vc Attachrentsa Exhibit "A ",- Locatioin Map Exhibit "E" - Site Pisan /Landscape Plan Exhibit "C" - Building Elevations r Resolution of Approval with Conditions 1 b J o : i h awN,ea � i o � i �tMCO,dary o •i� -ii�.w R E • a�- ssi -o� a c t�,i� vawm7 � � woauaia s � � � t l tr- alr -o7 � asp- .i�•op . �wes•e+ravin P z f lag i a � D /NORT�` CITY Or rrr.M- RANCHO CUCArviC 4GA : .� ,r1� l• .a PLANNING DIVEON ExtiimF: -ScLE= t 4 • J i at. T If: AWL IMA N01M CITY Of. _ tTr.*%t= PLANNING DIVISK).N F- XHIPAT =... .ALL•= . INO RTi- CITY O ITEM: �-�g Fes' nckg .�._ RANCHO CUCANIaN"GA nT11. A Yli 14C/ C79 �Y- trim. j+ l Il. J.011CA�S�d de.we�et��u Ji9L9Y 9A.-. l'�r FT Lp ®�rs� -.fie Mf�rmM1 (Lt r[n t 1 . MARY RLJKVA`Pl , nau.ar .m -. or r lcl— 'SOLITM ■L'V:Ci�iO1Rt WRIST RL VATION .ffl-..• INO RTi- CITY O ITEM: �-�g Fes' nckg .�._ RANCHO CUCANIaN"GA nT11. A Yli 14C/ C79 �Y- trim. RESOLUTION Nu, A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PE%ZITT NO. 86 -04 FOR RYDER TRUCK RENTAL LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF SANTA ANITA AVENUE NORTH OF 4TH STREET IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT - APR: 229- 331 -06 WHEREAS, on the 5th day of February, 1987, a complete application was filed by .Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of April, 1987, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above -dam ribed project. follows: NOW, MiEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission rc- sowed as SECTION 1 That the following findings can be met. 1. Thit,the proposed use is in accord with the General Plat, the objectives of the Industrial Specific Plan an(' thi': Development Code, and the purposes of the disl;rect in which the si<. ;e is located. 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvesaents in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use cupiies with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Pla::' and the Development Code. SECTION 2• -`,%t this prd -ect wi11 not create adverse impacts on ±,he environmenT -BU Tit at a Negative Declaration is issued on April 22, 1987. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 85 -04 is approved subject to e o owing condition: PLANNING DIVISION 1. Fencing along portions of the north and south property lines shall include a type of material that will provide screening of views from 4th Street and the freeway. This material must be to the satisfaction of the Design Review Committee and the City Engineer and approved pr?or to issuance of building permits. 2. Provide 24" box sine evergreen trees on 10 -15 foot centers along west property line for screening purposes. ;j, BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Mead Buller, epu y Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of t.`9 �_'ity of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and requIz•iy iitroduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Omission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of April, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: !COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION 110. CUP 86 -04 - Ryder Ap.11 22, 1987 Page 2 ENGINEERING DIVISION 1. The applicant shall be required to acy,4re all appr;;riate approvals from the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Raiir;,�d _ Company for any work within their easement prior to the issuance of a „grading permit. 2. An in -liau fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (electric,:kii on the opposite side of Santa kvita Avenue shall be paid tb� the City prior to the issuance rf� building permits. The fee shat M be one -half the city adopted` u�',iit amount times the length of the project frontage. 3. The applicaJ ,: shali V'' acquire a grading easepn, nt from the property owners to tha south for any work within their property prior to issuance of a grading permit. 4„ Notice of 'intention to form and /or join the lighting and landscaping district shall be filed with the City Council prior to recordation of the map or issuance " -of building permits, whichever occurs first. APPROVED AND AW-TED VIS 22ND DAY OF APRIJ, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Mead Buller, epu y Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of t.`9 �_'ity of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and requIz•iy iitroduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Omission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of April, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: !COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: l� V �I V V W 47 C' 6. s bCaV LN.Y .9 g FF= C N« T ccE }���u�iOA9N Npp�yCQ Cycu�� NCY. qY�4 9tl0 �QY9. ~.Ti Opp= Cp Oy C6 O.Ya�6i y0 O >ije 3aQu «�nr e°u -pr �e CV1 YcjVa _q9`Ci xei>°. baow v. _ ns—v g py uu�C 4CC �V ■ C; Ia 0 °tlw�°�e�yQN Ytk; C� �3q oY Y28is L6n qu'i xra��V ?�YO L Y> cEG C 1,2-: aY yb� nr� ri g8'�� N « =a "a YO NC «fy yJ`�.NC Gb M1 Oy 3 Y V Y C ya ytl E++E L p �Y' {, �aai Q I L9 = Yt C ' C 46 Y a GA d Ra y9Q ?uO "i "C a yY 1- S S W 0 O C s O F K O h i J >`u FF= C N« T ccE Z Lyt �CetO bilM CYp � .. CVC YU �N w j °VY Y.,.ayy,.V SOY � _ �O �pa uYV Yy, °b S. s N Ee ni ns—v ig • tliy.L.egg� ".n s Um N E 9 z �- r c Y r 212ft q tsuuLGC pp�� ar Y✓s� w {.��Q G .� } i a R K N �¢q r� ✓j N + O� 9 ✓O 3 Y � .. 46Y—*6 yGyCV� p�N{�t �4 \�O ��~ IIIZ ]tp.Q. p q.� yyyy ✓ N ✓✓y Mt tlq �Y1 �y aMf V C W E4 tl.0 AC =y sOrY Q ^O� .� yam,✓ % yz titM` YV=i�1pQ•Cr0'yrr"4N?, ✓pp a,{v, �r C y{�. =G ✓ON _ui CV'T�r^"9 aY.OoY9N -C)4 Y $b✓ ,j4• ^� wE Cyy 4p' .1 ✓2YI C „iwpN ei1p q NC � N N aC �`4OE> C C C YA �✓.0C G Cs y 6q . y^;� {� . C9� ° Rhpi « er «P V V N1 N�9=�Y gY'ry1 y' am,✓ ✓CL 6 rae y Y L ✓Y .✓pu. � L`r �y N✓ R - P L- p �nN Y 7y4 � u S Lm L a N ►r Lt s .. Stl �W Np.Otl4¢ O��j�Gi C�{�1 Fpwbj, CC �Ytl ^C 'a L((tt O �}¢(( a ✓h. YCN4^x 3r?p�F, s� LCb� NY jt CpN �N,. Ra »b wa.�w� N ^qIr NV "�O wrY^4�y�VC.M Y'b `YC ✓+-0. ” ^��' :a Y vT l y +^$ 4 a Vr C HE-5-3 h' is MaC � 60 0.c ,;N vt— p ✓°1e is 1�� LQa `,p� ^u.15 ��ew _(y tp �*��I -'djr.{ ■Lr] i% i M Y K` M �i +� y W 7 O C 4 1 q y� N 6 R iAl a $ mod rro a °- u O tlMY~. b LL O p Y C� N C Y y N L✓ 4 a L S CC Y� W a.p Y a��m n✓ a. iv ✓er y V N.. L M N w 7 9 M �'rr$ u° a i gi q Y Y■ u Lp 9V ■4TO Sqy N�Cw t 4�GL C+i +~s -t� YteNO c tl f a `3 p L N'�w ✓ �q'° L✓� �� N�yaa�1N�����CL C OC fl. 22 G y a G ✓ 9 D•.y v� v a• �cN� i �i II�iC e C 11 1; Lu. 9w0yp,. a1 3n,Q, A`Y L. Luce C�Cup,: Ea�q Mr. � �q iM ON,1R�Cet C �✓ q I V 1 .w9 -.� ✓.9 y CJ�. y��� �✓ V'� 4 4 4 .9 1 tt�� 3 O6Wp.�. � � ULF �Y�tlC^� pt ✓Nt OAi�yt .C�N.Yp 4! \9 'Cy ✓96Y tl�rr r � w 14 p-t 1 nL kL� V�� i g✓aMy �N. piV. g^��rop eNg���pL LYE yT<O ✓_ z $p °;: y?au�F E 01 A � Hm Zlz t L oNN a g $ U t $ 9> C b 4.�G1 a�u�N oyy ippo`o 1�+—ja ti rl y V Z V tJJ O CL. - ^_ELY CC p Ndaa� ps n Hp CC �`Y`•^• ^epp�ru .,'Len. .^ ^y -0y ._. f�L.i 4 p9..L y 1 Y OV 'S-J t K°1La•�A�wY �s �� � `�•+ Y�.a R $, • iy 9y L u yp O^w.N� Q� .1 .1 G N$ N y e` �••� .^ w �. • � Y > w�� O N O O N-0 V �.� � N � N L 4 N Y CL COQ• 4{iy`�" � ^! Vw^ CC C� y U Y O• 2 u Z� M �^ 4 p y N �r C p N U�� Y 1�. G� L i k' ^ Ov N y y� EL CM� vY 1pf O:O V )1 ^f�,�0•N � Yq. 0 0 a� G w .a,$ y 111iii ° at awed N L Y sit 2. .L 7cl lA i 9 .� E q 2 N v _ °� .' ^w iQCu yu °V DY{Q1nua c>egii Ni g�yy`Y. + + y U u•L`O K� L TLC �AK �nM fY1�tNL Y L ^C '£1``� E �I CN EC Uyd b• Y p�{� D- I 0... L Dy` .• y .DYE Y -k -a {L..$ a �N �� G4p ey.Y. Spw� Vt p��Yp >6� Ytw�4� G CL wYY �• �ae17VV ^..U,,11 •>Fi4D aCCpG`L < N 3 A F N {. K N V ^^ el > i'. T N O. O K oa■ a °u °r; 'y'T y :: °NAT �� Aa3 i �n. D � Y y C C 6 I= C +? i gE of y p 9 . ^ O -0 G -0 SEE, "D C -_ Yua CLNN j N9.N � �O QV yVV t Y 2r EY D:y S +CPO �p " L13N =aY•p m000" , NCC.Y�. O Y nY Y� 6• � G-0 -Y `4qp yOCC N � ^�N ..CVO ..a Y p >MW � ^LO60 r9 0.4 YE M' GNy'L NC • ^y•L VOA ^YC Y9 6 y�. 6. N'O „Y -.a O =w o - .°.. a �.y+. u AL->l v�- lt+v�i K�w.m T: J !ON i 6 <U KO fL-O Hew !O LAL <NY W W >p�N.Oi w M _f O L_ •N}� L ^Y. yea T a YC 4t dC ' Y p M U u I +T+ L r° G EEO C.�S O1i.11 •GC CCb gggg, -O � „O �¢ a GW p. �.q •Sy .Le�c� ~ou a''S� ap4LU ega �` m.w i'�jl� � � Ins inp �' �eppp e: LYF as .2 �'g?M. °wLg YY_S +�W +`V.WC pNNN VN Yw w e r'yi'”" F ++��v p.•^yg �da< ° - 1cL �uN =moo °YYC ei. a pw HOC VUp C'♦aa ��� � OYp Opt la Y ' �.W Lei cc� e. Z $ §o N�� Eli- .01 A. 666. �tiL Ww01 N�N06hry ,te! a p YC� .01 COL sY M SpVVy �e VV Tn � ' �qd �iCy N�VM CaL. '� ■��C LUWOVCZ Y� ii C L1 �l� OpYCy =°3n A: n;1. 1 Y, gU.. .�L. p 'rid gip �E} NLGiC -0j` LY.� Y wiG N COnB�Q i9IY ^.mod µ `� L6 iyp Lp•�af SW}l w�NMe`i `YA ��i _. FY�,.tl..� (s.O �Y(p�yup. iNbC�Y K O Cppi. H.I. p,R NiC u7 b�69 aL Op i7F y� �pppY.uq O�v pKO `���R N..L.O�. 0S F`:�`JW L. LZ6atlN `YY.G Y 1 S .. 1 a�CCmC LPca'`°e wo �L.4 � p" YSsro. Ca' Op Y EClt wwpp Yp �4�y p iv y G S.'` LL4 it w' �. wC p nOd YY 4Iy oG ^� � w 9 N G ; MQS GO . CS 'C,p w Y i N OyC 4 pL N,z 6Yi LV p.Y` D pK.. yi NOQ NN r�0 ��a�C ip1 X64 OBSd ^ Ln }N ` O�� am -W—. yin= is —° so Se canto c ayll '+.°. jeT i .'_ uw? rk �.ac c w�• a �^s.� �o^ E. .H.i uH� �..... aN p q ■ r r_ pu C C L Of L N `^' a Y�i 01i pfl` COQ l M W JAL CC1`Y r� Y6 GN �A f0.. g9w L GM �p6' EQ Q.0 �$ W @s hYtliQ ow • V ' LO I j� V O -SR-22 N 6 Y C u D a Off. a `J Ell L A D�Q D y AC J 2 A= S Y = 9CC 0 p N yFlsqq� Ors Y �� N N M 44 yLYDN OC NZ IX 6 C .D U MV' w NC9N x: H 0� 4 Z q0l� y GL Eyt8.2 .� eN C'L Y p.~ n bj Y � VYLL� a ^YY C AC _ a u �yCj E s` Y..N.Yn ^y �C � QK_0 Y dY� V 4 Y E S�> a V bC yD.. C dyYjLP y uM.P.9dq NY a�6�.1`b �qYY y.L ■ 01 C. N sC d CY V p CA 5�. 01. Aprz, mLSwE s°- .. A 9 w ^e = ° „8 3 N4AHY 3 3 bb OV a :y YY •qC• V a g N �+ N i =q PYa cC� I pp oN. LL 6�3U +E 041UO CUy T.. SpU� ! OOCW I Ij gL. p4C `N Cp (fi ACa L9. D L1 wD. a.�V iM O[�plp _ G 1 f GL OG Ts C MSC k a :N :a C+ s Y Cbvi. YYY OdY�.: Q OI �Y C y Y Y.S g< `Q �� ■ M; S �L- F C N M p� G L Y YCC .9.1 ^8 N ' w a & sial LAL L � A LWw+Ve � �� V �Yc nT ai � p C `� YQ jqq, yyA �CC T a�N� �A g. Q��1A C H yy■: Y� r� LMCay"� EL ,S4aaj FgIC « 'L N�yZ�CY 09000w6 V E'uUs till `a...iT Yi Vp� ■■�ppD ^G YO Bi �9' � Y@Yi+M 6 �1 r!`M�' 66 Y � pii N«ALI 4 Ms UL N �$ ,C 4y6 +�'. C- 9OLLL`Lw �O ■ Y C A� Y per. 9„GG C b�CYU DLNY as ¢s ` g CN Y �:sso G yC } CNV?t of a s A YY6V �b Pik �Y. :E^p xLL4C C_ « D am i L •i �_ gLN i4i� e n C y0� yp �9'p�w yyn�yy0 r 15 sr x {0t C•O�n. , i ^YGC NNza mp /by j�ia V.wLL OiQCVA sY 4Q rQ y� �uVY�i SL�r Ca ~iD• ?Ayy krd x1H WN� WUIT �° a�iat+ u°•. ��YL $.. g a VAVS� 2w4C �w.r. �.��. NA rl� •� V � � � �� � b t ? LO I Oro Yia+ sYOi S' $� aca �Y N�Q 3r V L c \y a% ��w.� a1 L4 �y0 LYE AE�Lya =r ro aW rCC ONE �xg €;,�, > es �O� Y�i >'L+�llw CVyW� w L Lly ip^ 2c, o\ R° 0 ro R �' > P v u R a �� �.0 � � V �L i Y e ' C � A t �^ L ° N of � '1y jj ■+� M LLN RNLI N �GI` Y x NpM y C' W = y �te yygyg/� C �� �cc Cp6.G � c°4i ibE C� � L4 L �v A; � 9 °O� Nr'• �•d Y yK D`. E Yy � �YC�• p. WY 90 �O SLY L�LLp a�4 M `u cz; AyNy V Li � LyO:^ °�a V' � V ° LV nay =4 C Cyc k1 S zi,y J: Ap'�' b y. E AV ��•'° 4 L v _ gx �Y O a ~ ^� Vac iN ®�W sN� ; 10.°• , v ayL V� =s QYt��Y{ijE H� a W: sL ti uW YLa L Y � RYL ey� 4a O.pNL.Y tiC �y'y��1�1WYy Y Gx� �+ c�� Y e"—! RCY.�. C-4 utO H9 6 #QV b+ W�N L:L {) ]tG ju�_[[+ \30. Q1`°. WS Ga tiNW WOI �6N a Oro Yia+ sYOi S' $� aca �Y N�Q 3r V L c \y a% ��w.� a1 L4 �y0 LYE AE�Lya =r ro aW rCC ONE �xg €;,�, > es �O� Y�i >'L+�llw CVyW� w L Lly ip^ 2c, o\ R° 0 ro R �' > P ^ jai :r.qo n. YJn Cp N6Y '^LrE 3 Np y°. p' D' ° N of � '1y �,•,A Lc1po Yiu��9 Luzeo N6WN.r M d.V � •J RNLI �GI` Y x NpM y C' W Oro Yia+ sYOi S' $� aca �Y N�Q a% ��w.� a1 L4 �y0 LYE AE�Lya Cu aW rCC ONE �xg €;,�, > es �O� Y�i >'L+�llw CVyW� w L Lly ip^ 2c, CC'r cE `y.P ^ jai :r.qo n. in Cp N6Y i.a Nq as,° ° N of � '1y �,•,A Lc1po Yiu��9 Luzeo N6WN.r iiu� NLm d.V � •J RNLI �GI` Y NpM y C' W W- I J s LZ v« an Y C a� sa ul o O $" c a �3 a $„ YY = O O LL.. A L G �u C 4 D b OY M� p� U c tryL G. OpG Gpds p Y Y iidY .. pp..M'g4 U ^�T Ma} O E oo a I� w 4 P QJw� YDLL � N a iGYM y,G „LL if1 Y npnpwq' C94 y GG M - a rev $ o A fo � p =W V O 0 YY y� Y p G .s c ^.� V Y Y A d a L N�°."a LL C1y� L V D q s.- L Nu .S'i ... Nn a.aiiy ci, nw '„'Lug, �4wL 81 nL GL � L67V4 4L. YN:yY SAO N �a 49 Du C q CYL .V �. y(.^ �9 Y yYYN � Yy� 6 N r N y I r� d W 6. • d S j r O �t� OY M� p� U c tryL G. OpG Gpds p Y Y iidY .. pp..M'g4 U ^�T Ma} O E oo a I� w 4 P QJw� YDLL � N a iGYM y,G „LL _ 1= - a $ o A fo n p =W V O 0 OY M� p� U c tryL G. OpG Gpds p Y Y iidY .. pp..M'g4 U ^�T Ma} O E oo a I� w 4 P QJw� YDLL � N a DATE: TO:' FROM: BY: p SUBJECT S 9 I. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT E1} $ hZ April 22, 1987 asr. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Debr, Meier, Assistant Planner MODIFICATTO,N TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -34 - SHERIFF AND &JzuwAltb Froposal for remodeling the 5 ore front facade, minor building additions and reconstruct drive approaches !For an existing neighborhood commercial shopping center on 7.8 acres of land in the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District located at the northeast corner of Carnelian Avenue and Baseline Road APN 202- 381 -24, 25, 26, 28 -33, 35, and 36. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of building elevations and site plan, B. Surroundini Land Use and Zoning: or - Existing �iaentia ;Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units /acre) South - Existing Office Building; Office /Professional (OP) East High School; tow Residential (2 -4 dwelling units /acre) West - Existing Residential; Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units /acrr) C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - e-Ign or ood Commercial North Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units /acre) South - Office East - Public Facility (High School) West - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units /acre) D. Site Characteristics: The subject property is presently developed with approx mately 86,000 square feet of commercial retail area. Street improvements, parking and landscaping are also existing. ITEM I r PLANNINO COR 1SSION STAFF REPORT CUP 84-34 - SHERIFF AND A•S40CIATES April 22 1987 P d e2 g ` II E. Parking Calculat{ans: Number of Number of Type •Square P3r'ing Spaces Spaces of Use _ Footage Ratio Required Pylovided [detail /Office 88,631 1:250 354 Restaurant 2,4C0 1 :100 24 Fast Food 4=959 1:7s, 66 Total 95,990 444 454, Note: Existing Square F4bta8e 85,665 Proposed Addition 10,3?5 , Total 95,950 I I. AMV','' PSIS: A. General: The site was constructed about 12 years ago under t,aun of San Bernardino Developtitent Standards, Conditional Use Permit 84 -34 was approved by the Planning Coonission in November of 1484, and was issued a one -year time extension in November of 1986. That approval included a new building pad; updating architectural treatment and style of existing buildings, additional landscaping, pedestrian convenience areas and upgraded drive approaches and entry statements,,, all of which are consistent with the goals of the General Plan,and Development Code. The modifiration to WSW: Conditional Use Parmil is essentially a redesign of the store F4torit3 to a post- modern arcnitectural style. B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Cbitiea, c ei , u er ave reviewed the plans and has recodmenderd approval of tiie project with suggested improvements, To =ummariae the many meetings in working with the Design Review Comaittee, the general topics were: .. Establishing the focal point of the center at Stater Brothers by enlarging th* tower feature and creating an octagonal shape. 2. Treatment of all the tower elements was important to alleviate the black mass a; the tipper portion. The final solution was to create an 8-inch reveal and opening in, the towers which will be underlit at night. dW li t� t qW PLANNING C4td4ISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 64 -34 � SHERIFF AND ASSOCIATES April 22, 1987 Pa §e 3 3. Project detail -s ,were covered including color, material and texture, column details and signage. 4. Treatment of he rear of the - easterly buildings, particularly that portion facing the high school, was important to views from Baseline Road. That area wil be treated with archway details and painted to match the rest of the center. ; 5. The Committee and the center's owners discussed the importance of eventually upgrading both the bank and the Carl's Jr. Restaurant to be compatible with the new`(y designed()shoppireg center. By coincidence, both the bank and Carl's Jr. have recently expressed to the .center's owner and /or to the City the desire for certain improvements to design or color, etc. They wou'id be encouraged to make any changes in conformance with plans approved with this application. Unfortunately, the Cal!F s Jr. restaurant was repainted the week of Apr,'1 6 in a color scheme that was rejected by the !Committee. Also, the proposed building pad for an a0ditional fast food restaurant musk be - processed and approved through a future development review application for review of architecture and site design consistent with plans approved with this application. 6. The Committee also discussed the idea of a meandering sidewalk aiong Baseline, a usuai requirement for -a special boulevard. However, in this particular case, the existing sidewalk is sfraight and the Committee felt that .with the difficulty in meandering the sidewalk within the existing slope, they would rather see the emphasis be placed in enhanced landscaping rather than reconstruction of the sidewalk. C. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review 'Caimittee has reviews the pr-oJ-e-ct--a-nT determined Oat with recommended l conditions of approval, the project is consistent with applicable standards and ordinances. The following conditions were the most notable results of Technical Review: 1. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) shall be undergrounded prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first, as follows WANNING COWISrJOH STAFF REPORT CUP 84 -34 - SHERIFF AND ASSOCIATES April 22, 1987 Page 4 a. Baseline Road, - From the f %rat pole on the nest side cue Carnelian Street'to the firs, pole off site east. of;;, east project boundary. b. Carnelian Street - From the first pole -on \ the south side of. Baseline Road to the _ first ,pole off site north of the north project boundary. Reimbursement for one -half the City adopted cost of undergrounding fray the future development as it occurs on the opposite side of Carnelian Street is not feasible because the property is presently developed. Partial reirabursement for one -half the ,ity adopted cost of Undergrounding on the.opposite side of BFI.seline is feasible from the presently undeveloped' properties. The 66 -K.Y„ electrical lines crossing Baseline Road and Carnelian Street at the intersection shall be exempt from the Undergrounding requirement 2. She site must comply with the uniform Building Code property line protection regulations. Compliance can be achieved by the applicant accomplishing pne of the following items: a. Remove all property lines within the entire shopping center; or b. Record an "agreement to hold all parcels as i one ". 1 III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the Development o e and he General Plan. The proposed uses, building design and site plan, together with the recc mnded conditions of approval. is in compliance with all applicable City standards. It* addition, the property will not be detrimental to the adjacent properties or cause adverse environmental impacts. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing —y -Report i inrThe aalli Newspaper, the property posted, and notices i sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. i; PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 84 -34 - .SHERIFF AND ASSOCIATES loJ Apri i ,22, I987 (; Page 5 V. RECOWENDATIOA: Staff recommends approval 01,' the modification to Conditional se'Permit 84 -34. Respe ully submitted, ra i r T City Pluanner r BB :DM:te Attachments: Exhibit r'A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit °C" - Building Elevations - -, Resblution of Ap"al with Conditions i _maw AV y r I 4-t - F....- .... -.. - - FL Ci i;F� �J� . A i 1 � . 1L1 •y f r' py� 8��1 f `i/tiLi iQliil ♦ I� _ „I`y'1 t t e {•huh i t` _" I - .-J � ,s �sEline pmd�`J --•! _ NC" _ OP os FC hL il� l is � � ! �•�, C //- _ •� li A4 CITY CIA 1 O1` iTT..M= Cam✓ � 4 r ig / RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVIS ,,N ExKli -,. A - ,LE:._„_..�;' +t w r tt IYls' KYIY ' + �1 lOilriO! tYtiillL tRY llMtM llt}t11rN. tlNltlt tlK {HtIM tY1!! NM V. V. t1R! V. ttM! 4/: ItIN V MM N. Sri • s o ' v � 1./ *—Nt t+l � ✓. VaJ .T� � V. y � C lflllllttYlgR Yi P �V SAM ST. ~• ~ iORT CI'T'Y Or. rrcm RANCHO CUCAMONGA. rrm- 0/210 i, PLANNING DIVLgW EXE{It3['['= � SG1LG: r. arm Twol all film* I'm ou I If I —Ii I R I 11-111 ■ mliu if m [Uhl T a to rm.WAMW r Crry OF , :K PLANNING DIV FXH«rr= 00 11 RESOLVilON NO. A RESOL6,16R OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 84- 34 FOR THE REMODELING AND NEW CONSTRUCTION FOR AN EXISTING COMMERCIAL CENTER LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BASELINE ROAD AND CARNELIAN STREET IN THE N'.IGHBOW "D fj�PMRCIAL DISTRICT APN 202- 381 -24, 25, 26, 28 -33,," 3,-;' AND 1,35. WHEREAS„ On the 5t! day of February, 1981, a complete application was f-, 'led by Sheriff and Associates for review of he above- described project, and WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of April, 2987, the Rancho 4ac -onga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described project. NOW, THEREFORE,,the RanchG Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as i folio .4: SECTION 1. That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use 4�_n accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development. Code, and the purposes of the district in which tht-site 4s Located.; 2. That the proposed use, together with -the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detriments) to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injuries to properties or improvements in the vicinity.`;,, 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. SECTION 2 That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environmen an at a Negative Declaration was issued on November 14, 1984. SECTION 3; That modification to Conditional Use Permit Nv. 84 -34 is approved subject o the following conditions: - Engineering Division. I. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) shall be undergrounded prior to public improvement acceptance or occupanc,z, whichever occurs first, as fol Ws: a. Baseline Road - From the first pole on the west side of Carnelian street to the first pole off site east of east project boundary. b. Carnelian. Street - From the first pole on the South side of Baseline Road to the first pole off site north of the north prOect boundary. AA P41NNING COMP ISSI'ON RESOi,UTION NO. GUP 84 -34 - SH RIEI AND ASSOCIATES I April 22, 19871 Page 2 R(- .abursement for one -half , the City zdopted cost of undergrounding from the future development as it occurs on tt "" opposite side of Carnelian Street is not feasible because the ' property is presently dsVelzped. Parcel reimbursement for one- half ty +e "Cii; )dopted cost of Undergrounding on the oppos't side of Baseline is feasible from the presently undeveloped properties. d. The; 66 K.Y. electrical lines crossing Baseline Road and Carnelian — Street at the' intersection shall be exempt from the Undergroundint.t=requirement. 2. All drive approaches shall bs` reconstructed in accordance with City Standard Drawing No. 3 ,' 3. A 'right turn pocket for the, entrance to the, southerly drive approach on Carnelian -shall ,•a . constructed to the satisraction of the City Engineer. ? 4. The center island as shown within the second driveway east of Carnelian on Baseline shall be removed or the driv gray widened to 50 feet to provide 20 foot drive aisles with a 10 foot island. The island shall begin at the property line. - Building and Safety Division: 1. Applicant shall ac%umplish one of the following, options in order to comply with Uniform Building Code property line protection regulations. a. . Remove all property lines within the shoppAng center site; or b. Record an "Agreement to Hold all Parcels as One ". This shall be completed prior to issuance of building permits. Planning Division: 1. Tire site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans (which includes architectural treatment, exterior materials and color, landscaping and grading) on file with the Planning Division, the conditions contained therein, and Development Co,+- ;Regulations... 2. Stater Bres. entry doors shall be relocated and centered under the archways. PLANNING COi+l+iItSION RE.WLUTION NO. CUP 84 -34. - wkiFF ANTI ASSOCIATES April 22, 1987 c :Page 3 3, The rear of prodect facing east;-shall be treated with two arch details and ainted to match `h ii p e en,t re censer. 4. Materials and textures to be used shall be as follows: a. Stucco walls Me, dash coal, j Columns - Smooth f Ash,'glass fibre reinforced I c. Underside of soffits and towers' - Stained wood r 5. Column bays shall be on 20 foot zentters. 6. A7 -1 signage snall be individual channel letters. A unifarm sign ',rogram shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permi ^,s. 7. Cowers shah have 12 -inch roof oviWiangs and 8-inch reveals 1 ;with openings to allow theta. to be underl i t at ni f.xht. S. Detailed landscape and irielgation p'Tad shall be submitted'for review and approval by the Planning Division prior to- ;issuance of building permits. LandsrApinq improvements shall be compietad prior to final inspections conducted by both Planning and OP{',. inn & Safety Divisions., APPROVED ANn ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF APRIL, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION\ OF THE-.CITY OF RANCH3 CUC.AMONGA BY: airy 1. c e a mian: ATTEST: tsrao tsulIer, veputy Secretary I, Brad Bul lor, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Coa:tission of the City o Rancho Cucamcv9a, oo hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly intrtduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Cormiission of the City F Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission'?eld on the 22nd day of April, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: _:AISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS; ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: arcs q v w.Ny =�LLVp et L v e0e .p O a v O q g V a - > p ` ac- rd °i ac \�N�� nZ pe ^EV cu t SOD V Ga� q a� N = s A a q O 4 A y 6 r;ria elYe. sq o��is ol O-Z _. w t °��i a °.x-1 T_ ia. 3 a ^s Nn° Qyua E'• °a�CC� v L oe� -A Syr 9 P� �t4...T. °ate N• sV p ,�-� ■p ��ir i q YOa t YO' >.Yp � O NBC. SIN L� Oy bYP 6.2 V C 1~C O °C bpi CYw YV a1 Cl.0 g�.� ju.G E'S 2 VAz 41u u ^•v atVNVU d� V O69 ZN1 im E n F•si V7 C V« 'iCw� �!� S Ogm R Ti RI t! t^ 2 t O O ti r N °x ; °y. c rg o'agm.aec 5 Gii i � •°V �EML° An +. _ � = •tl 4 a -` a o =' • a �'� �a t o e ° opni e�N y AL.� cn Sgt j L O Y °~ q a q G �VgeiN LYq S � O .N•. ` Cl L d� uNi M M a Y rd tY� ^�° b� O �. V Y �•� —N� L+ Q Ot St. ati''i a mt „°• � N Y au ?.T a ^.4 owaa N aye V ^ yy :co .g .r o� °ae+ a •�i >ce ° 1p q c�c L 1�Ca1� Y_YCa "c Om.'uC�ya NN ngpnt CVp �� rCL S C! ` Nt ram nL. lm LL 2 N A N.e�•K IS to I l f Q N •V \V. Z S 1 V k 7 r � • -Tusc �i c,Taa c01 O:O��. o «e qr Vq qy N�NYry({� pfy�L Cr NEa N �cp cEO It 0a ..iso N G N� � � � E 2 q ` 2 O C YL �Y�L rgCC YOU OffV•. �- �CY�Vr 9^ O Is a�N.A�f�auiva O tld - P °Ewe Y4� G N G n ° QV p =C. -.A � �i.q Y qr.•q� • A� •Gr q a va d o E �y pp r •- Yy�.. <E 6 d SC N Y^ H alai uw u u.+ e gTU6; L �pydq ur.o rLV ..•C n °� A� ''EE.Q NM• V .`.qqL .°u T� Y Y�� �C Y �•' �$CA yaL LP °r YON Y.'L s yYY v t Ny G 9 p • p L Y J ♦ C y P N pNP t� °• 3 Y N N Y Q Ly4Y.. P �� - Q +� S p V• j Y.CNa >>.ai i1�� ^GV•°.. N�'� ON}q�O� Ou Ad n u - ° -S"r .. . sl Y -GpC OT+S may`` S•6 b.L .G.B yY'ljY b52 G qq E 1L. rp O•. Y LC CA CC O N 1 Y O C L I,.- L O y C V N f ,r; } ^yO1y. �•• b�9 q G ASE YYLp - C ., L.A.. - Myy Y d3NaUV tyY. P yg `Yn o N Ud OO LVX.Y Y Nu .. CL 4 V += S-�. C Cy 4uQ� C " •r Y y A $. L y ` S � O is V• 1� q Q\ e� ��HLyy}'Ud g � � g OOL C d p. L °NN�ti �FGy. EN L 9p �Cna Cqg Y uc -C r�AE ^'' NA.N.vY YtO Ti =L w r U Y ,L r gA u•O G N C U 5 Wu'C Ny;9 ¢ A Z--. ^LNO °q NYy N =0 Or GN Yu~c Y >p YN NN •UV O, ^?S �N « 9aa• °a CE� Y2 i AG ^ No iaQ9 $P> 1pLU Ol Y � OO.'^ Y y�Y 6 S w �E w.Gg a.+ Yu P � c a� —�' e..v Lt sG � Wu O'-'P i' `Nq $'r C 97 o= g q °O¢ev`>.�iva d. cffiC° ° °:i ago �6ffiE i v OTC N.. -c N H j A' LZN A•+ •- >NC U On aOW �'� L` q` L c C« V.4� °9 G'. Y -Nq +40 Cyii °uAN Cis ..°SCE '[• O O '.�d G Y u '- Y Ns.. $i sig °cv °Ar < 2- .�o ° ar duo C D YM Y•uu• U i_ =w �9 .. L N d • `0NG N. ., °M LCUN N C H'M T q:N _ U�4> •. LNLC � 9q Cyyg —". �C G G.G OT} WA U p L T p CL C �6 22 U 9 E Y A •• �- N f ,r; i I 1 ,•. .q iO..p. GVV ED ^A 8 — ^C Cam. d8 OT 00y�° +YSYgyyp CyiQO LO ,.G.�C Y C ib t6.SY .•°� M O.d N0. .,.� c. G Y•`r�6 C O �p Y.d 0. GYY�� + A Yd> y ECWL MN d ZV yam" gyp. y�j ^. 64 d.YMT Cis V C LNy �bp OLNB N O O O C L p 4�yS: O Na L Nom'. UL b. �auP M � YG¢¢ail xL ��NN DNN HYp Sd � 4 a w -0,a�i U+a•O _ CD � 9. y � � 4 0. i✓ ^ ° W p MaN[y aSA C L W. �n � byy IM G o_i aND� y CI 0. G "F o4G �b LS „ry w. 6~°�O ITY pC -S : E C r 0 4ZA b" �� N qL �.. C Q 4 ^:wN`�N�Q w N —.: y t r G^ u '•V' r� _ ' gyp. N' � ^ CC N Q O N I --u S a OI w1 Y O y C q x «G O S M L C N A - q f' 0.4 a�w�e. G Y N L L. d N• 9 CNyc E 6 yy Y 0. wr= H C v G` L4C SAO �� �D aAC.OM � v qd 6.nY tEEE.- ^Y.VC y OA wO NOLYy GV OS w .dam � .fib b V .• Sl^ w CCN AOV C Y b— L ✓�'^CWA 6N� iN � —O i�NG. <N Y�AiNi OI�N RO oC.AC 0. tU {LLO AG V~i Da CVC VAN nLtca ^�C ..sv+' uL sc �o S n f aG�C V L �iOd Ni Cr G� �= N i pA�9n i q� EaSi y�Y.q I � �— G t L C q �I D• N~ D C N�� 6 V� ial 4� 4� CIS 6' O Y O. $OI y pt G iY qQ HL aC q�� Y�v � Eq w•. ._ 3v yo�> a�' '^. A.g pr,� _ L- `L'Jw� g= =Y$ 4--z A _ pD way.N. C. p "� et yN� �� LD d y-0 NV 78 g, c yy GN V.N 06 ~ Na VCwO6.- II I Gb bG.pA a N t pwd:L GA Z afY Y. LU An V - Y 5 ++i � ° ,GY i u Vyw. CLNN. ..� .2Y9 N.Y r Tw L Nb YNy.L ZG .S.L� Vbt rl .pw N� • � A^ � A q a. V µ • �� Q S r L V („ u L g b T 0 4 i Eud `Nd'QNA A U N A N 9^ ° N ^u. bl .. 4 Y.e 1-212.5 aaroYA i >6� VVN AuF r_ I LO 'N R td ° wy, GG°J p MO NC.i? O p. C 0.Ntab i LJt uQ' DunOl LS Ab b Y Y� 0.yCy 9"b N'&4 3!u t ..N. V Nq C`� pa y Ots O b QNwppL uG �VYr" pN q:Q AA Ydy II+G�CCA.A Ct•. L 6 'Z t!X 1p a NO au+ro ava.. ci✓ t-o Or yM �L ., a .D +-nN t-o x -A ��. �: U t] W �I C i 1-1-12 Y e�c SE:��a p w "6 Rf L Qip p d L bq`Y i[t • CYH YVua In q0. d LU O i Ind L Qg cC _ pp Y � cr • dC ff ✓ C1 � ^ T � fl , Y q N 4> Y � q � x L u � L ? �k IL�0. O. O� QO4 LVC w COCA Yn O >p � �c9c � ^�y OC�Jrr �p+ O °6n 9 UY E. 6=:c GGG3O L dO a+ Yp� Y jam.` Ot C.GQ y4$C ^ �O.d qON '2�'uOCw a. C O E r N C 0. N p Li a e L N is e Y V C CYl tLl O y 6 n V A ' OG R � 1 �` = a^ W a 4 Brx1 1 P Q �T Q L PIi C V q CH �^9 i Oaa�,Cpp CYyf D gO4wEq H N � V �+ N x T 7. 3 r J f. � T 4 f q •.e• a � < d� ci 1°i Ng� C W W �! L Y .+ U. C 1 F � t tyu V Y � CAC O O� ad0 O °C V E C9 y VtN y y^O Y �9 � C 'J V� = = CYx a OL�V ° it s c iia F F..y1 oa. av-a v 4 T T1f a N��AYO Q d a a QOC� i i',LN `CL�Ye � �O'Ar � ¢ 7 q qaYrF y LaOVp� ` ¢F IL YTS d au 9 Y Y CY�eM Ur l ll"Y A ANY �6 N N �aA�Y$. d H Yyy�O�. C C� L L�o <q ' '.y q.= 'S i i� ■ d�p4� N N V9 _ O ■'u� � YY Y Yom^ C CyNyO p OA4 C C =` � �OySSSa YyLL J p�yrjCV 4 d O 0.¢u) q C = OCC H NW9 F FCGV ' 'i LlLN 6. F F•q9 .+ M F1.)ull 6 6°O GCI�rN � �•' +`Q � � 1A dUp 1-1-12 Y e�c SE:��a p w "6 Rf L Qip p d L bq`Y i[t • CYH YVua In q0. d LU O i Ind L Qg cC _ pp Y � cr • dC ff ✓ C1 � ^ T � fl , Y q N 4> Y � q � x L u � L ? �k IL�0. O. O� QO4 LVC w COCA Yn O >p � �c9c � ^�y OC�Jrr �p+ O °6n 9 UY E. 6=:c GGG3O L dO a+ Yp� Y jam.` Ot C.GQ y4$C ^ �O.d qON '2�'uOCw a. C O E r N C 0. N p Li a e L N is e Y V C CYl tLl O y 6 n V A ' OG R � 1 �` = a^ W a 4 Brx1 1 P Q �T Q L PIi C V q CH �^9 i Oaa�,Cpp CYyf D gO4wEq H N � V �+ N x T 7. 3 r J f. � T 4 f q •.e• a � < d� ci 1°i Ng� C W W �! L Y .+ U. C 1 w L C to ]"CC• Y LLLI tz �E O � L r• Q � ° V Y C y N V ag6 CZ�MN4 iIL �r• 'O Y v r LLJ _ Yy 11 � Vr tC Al -E E$ Y'Y �wNV YV _ W C G9 al 6 n u C C ' a•Er i�NC �d q. a���. �'. rB G O O ,�� 9 � NCG��,. �+� y W V Y + Y N G PU to 9 Y i +C ii OTCM L.vO° I. I ryih VCC S •NI. K °6L'.G R yDy�� O J e°q 1, °% C °SAN'" �` $ " 3 �T �$v� S54;.^ Ell + +.C$' °NR,s„ aa. L'gi ^u c.. N.R.'S r .E me yy .. < $�• e�� °`$ ar.. a^ ° �'N�uM3 i E, NAnk 4000. qqL OlC 4� CN �° `- yru +✓ {SpiyV Y. )4�C'y WO NSG 94 Iyf aV NY L?L ^pp6p NN WYV 9G 7 O YL ✓O« SY 'vim V -Y .H MfJ V. i. ati o en « hn Y C s.Y�. w ae r .v. L9Z�_ «Cq VV�LppV Lf L O°C °6 �L' .9 gpoSN` O 'x Y •r �OU yaa ■6GC. ll LL L CV O H o H O N Y ° O Qp +L ^LpO z L~I r N ^O Y Dcq $ H _ MCI; CI;y VN� VL° H�Vp Fa G NN. 1°r T LZ-y v p C ti9ti 6'HU NLLCjy� K CW u YC °� VTfCf���jj° y. OpQ H ri pp~ N Y Z �• W `. V Y 5 q 2 yYC« c L G'^ <VV H E Y C =0v L U — yp VC.YY° `2 yyo GK VV V &W BC..OL .FLY ��RyL 'T 6 OY6 V •P �yC�t �O ^� C °4..MOC VY aW g= �^ HG� �� O�•3�C�CyLyt �+ OG ''D1 pp i� a�! 9pC { �°.Oy �M U� `ZM V�VC YC YLY1` 1 VNaLL U»» Y> MW Q.�(U1. CV 4�•C1� TtL Y{NY� CLH V "y'C -.2C V+ L HV. YeR+ L Y S 6�Y KU C 6� 1[ L. L V^ W LV ^ Y 26 CC O L d -Ka ° C O .0 9 g 1.` +e N Y W K 6 N V ``y71 LV O YL ✓O« SY 'vim V -Y .H MfJ V. i. ati o en « hn Y C s.Y�. w ae r .v. gJ Z Lf L Yrp • �L' .9 La ��� t� g .emu c 6' z L~I r N ^O Y Dcq $ H _ MCI; CI;y VN� VL° H�Vp Fa G NN. 1°r T LZ-y v p C ti9ti 6'HU NLLCjy� K CW �Ca 4Qi 0 W 1 r. Y H ri O YL ✓O« SY 'vim V -Y .H MfJ V. i. ati E .g Q r .v. gJ Z Lf L iii re {{11 t� g 6' z L~I r N X-4 �O YL ✓O« SY 'vim V -Y .H MfJ V. i. ati E YJ Lf L iii re {{11 g Dcq t'c oa+° �•� 6. p °C MCI; CI;y VN� L Fa Ur V LZ-y py L p C ti9ti 6'HU NLLCjy� K CW �Ca � rY VL pp~ N Y Z �• W lD e MI- N, O Z LA W O 5 CL a= Lai v u >o� nn Y O' o_ a ?, o ac nN Y� a= 4� 4.. L Cx 9� $ �a Y O 7 D J C q O O O ^�Dy • uCa .Yq. iH� a Y �N.^.. � 1�1, C IW.L, 'O �Y VY Li.�^ E IC YY6yC v Y Or.A 5,1 LOII�2 Y ��r y O ¢Q N epO,,aCC M�. `'S Y ±q aY OCG G P L Y .• a _ u Y �' C r i r= M L- W �O Y H.NV� {Ira Y yprC O pY 6�=u Y L L r• N •• y ~,lY C24 1 y pcQc do Ji rp�✓ Ga.rr u�•. _LV Ors a >YYCp M C O L a Z. O N z w p A � Y b C � Y R'S O C cLr '� P N i.. N .Q y >• �OL�y.YO 90.0 9 r C� = � Y=P ✓x.` v p` A `C YC L = L L C C O Y UL Y. I YY �O Y •.0 q r O ' MQ y01�> C 2 a— ye1 E C O.A TLY.e LOF4 Iwy YN OIL OA + 9Y cw Lwr-� CNC y V Y N it Y i u,Y c 2 C CW O� !Z 6N.rN 3 !6 h'� •. O.JL•L ial.. LL Z 2. FNd �� �� mj w O ^I _ �• �. � ^I �1 1 i 1 W 11 Em El DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: U CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMt -)NGA �'canfo STAFF REPORT Q � .. 7 U Aprlil 22, 1987�� Cha man and Members of the Pi tinning Commission' Brad Buller, ity Planner Debra Meier, f ssistant Planner ENVIW NTl;l' ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 »11 � MIKS, L ONE NO. 2510 - A proposal oca a an s Lbdge of square Te et within a multi - tenant industrial center in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) located at 8696 Utica Avenue APN:�, 209 - 142 -10- I. PRGJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of _.onditional Use Permit and frsuancgsof Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: Aortfi vacant land; Industrri-al Specific Plan, Subarea 6 South - Yacant land; Industrial Specific Plan, Subarea 4 East Vacant land; Industrial Specific Plan, Subarea West - Vacant land; Industrial Sp2cif�c Plan, Subarea 8 C. General Plan - Designations: Projr d:t Site Industrial Park North - Industrial Park South - Industrial Park East - General Industrial Hest - Industrial Park D. Site Characteristics: She Industrial Center in which the Elks Lodge reques s o- Tocate is presently under construction, and will be complete soon. Properties surrounding the site are all vacant. The property to the west abutting Haven Avenue, is a future phase �f the same Industrial center. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The Elks Lodge will have regular lodge meetings each mont and club dances and dinners. In addition, up to 24 outside (non - lodge) parties may be held. The primary activities will be held in the evening between 6:60 p.m. and midnight. Occasionally lunch will be served between 11 :00 a.m. ITEM J PLANNING COWIS5ION STAFF REPORT Conditional Use Pen -it 87 -11 April 22 1987 Page 2 and 2 :00 p.m. Th_' 1069,,1 wi '.l ronsi'st of a large meetirg room, bar lounge, k tcliun, card room, pool room and offices (see Exhibit "D "). B. Issues: The major issues related to locating this type of use w> >n an industrial or office .setting are compatibility with surrounding businesses and parking availability. Futurj�.- tenants in adjoining suites would mist likely conduct_bu�F.Iness Monday through Friday 8:00 a.m. to(S «DO p.m. Therefore, tree only potential conflict that may occur would be daring the occasional lunch meatiags between 11;00 a.m. and rL;00 p.m. Within that time period parking may exceed that of /a typical, multi- tenant user, which 'is one (1) space per 404 fjquare feet or 15 spacer (8;037 square feet leased space). Therefore, staff recommends thaa;a condition be placed upon the lodge operation to limit lunches or other activity durSng regular business hours tA activities which would not require more than 15 parking spaces (see Condition 7)., During eve Jng hours and weekends when lodge meetings aced dinner dances are held, a greater number of parking spaces are necessary: Parq'I 4 (see Exhibit "Cu) contains 50 spaces on site and the sd.oining Parcel 3 contains another 35 spaces. Therefore, 85 spa�es are within fairly close proximity to the proposed Elks Lodge " - ``e Foothill Fire Protection District has reviewed this application and requested additional information from the „lf(s Lodge (see Exhibit The tenant improvements would require plan check and permits. Further, the facility must )e upgraded, wherever necessary, for the intended use to satist;v all building and fire codes (see Condition 61. C. Environmental Assesnt• p Upon review of Part I of the Initial 'emu y an completion o art II of the Environmental Checklist, staff has found no significant impacts related to a private lodge organization locating within this industrial center.. III, rXTS FOR FINDINGS: The pregosed project is consistent with the Tn us r a peci c Plan. The proposed use, together with the recommended condition; of approval, will not be detrimental to public health, or materially injurious to the properties in the vicinity. IV. CORRESPOUDENCE: This item has been advertised as a Public Hearing in The Dal tv:,4r newspaper, the property posted, and notices weree sew T property owners within 300 feet of the project site. In addition the application was forwarded to the Foothill Fire Protection District for their review and rimment. S - Z PLANkNG COWISSION STAFF REPORT Conditional Use Perp'�.. 87 -11 ' April 22, 1987 Page 3 V. RECCOMMENOATT%; Staff recom+nds approval Of the Conditional Use erm an �.J $uance of a Negative Declaration. Resp tfull)r submitted, E Bra Bul er City Planner BB.DM:vc Attachments: :. Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant exhibit "B" - Memorandum from Foothill Fire District Exhibit "C" - 'rFocation Map Exhibit "B" Site Plan Eunibit "E" - Floor Plan _ ,,Resoiution of Approval' with Conditions �Y TV 12481 Baseline Fd. g P.O. BOX 662 t / Rancho Cucnmo6gd, CA 51720 March 16, 1987 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department Rancho Cucavaonga, Ca, 91730 Cr_ntlemim: The Rancho Ct;camonga Elks Lodge #2570 intends to use the building at. *2w Utica Street for the new Elks Lodge. We will'.have four (4) regular Lodge meetings a month, and our cjub dances and dinners. We will bavc ;a catering license that will allow us to'';hcld 24 outside parties over and above our Elks functions. The number of employees will vary as to our,needs, The comber' will never 07,0eed 7. The hours of operation will also vary sd to our needs. On occasions lunch will be served between ll A h. t and 2 CO P' -M. Mm t of our club actIA,. —Ies will be during the evening hours of .b -±l'r and Midnight. The purpose of the requested permit is to allow our Elks Lodge to function as a Private Club. Please find enclosed the required site plans and inside floor plan. We -hope you find this reply to your request complete. As of this date there are no neighbors within 390 feet of us, nor do we anticipate any in the near future due to the fact it is a commercial facility„ Respectfully yours, I Ken D. Walston, Sr. Chairman, Board of 'arustees cc: John Minnerino Tim Martin Dan Richards w. FOOTHILL FIRS PROTECTION DISTRICT TO Debra Meiol�, - Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department FROM: Inspector Wolfe F'aothill Fire D16trict -' SUBJECT: BPOE #2570 (Elk's Lodge) 8691? 4 a DATE: Apr3:1 6, 1987 L.` There are P -veral 'Morse, -t8 obvious after ,seeing the dra;ing; 1. The .drawing is a-) poorly done, it IZ impossible ° to do a complete r view -6 r 2. Impossible to determine ocr: :; ?ancy classification, which will determine if 4 Mire alarm system is required, if spri.nklears are required; what type of occup�ncy can !nova in next door, sharing the party wale. 3. The - �kitch�\n will be classified as a commercial kid( -An. squiring the inW; allation of a fixed fire protec�ioa 3Vxtemi fo ;ail cooking surfaces. Plans and fees mush:.6e_ submitted. 4. Ask applicant to submit an cwne,'s letter staging in which rooms the p.i,' yY will be allowed and ' in which room(s) dancing All be permitted. -RECEIVED- MY Of RANCHO CUCAMONU tI ANNING DIVISION k APR 0:8 1387 PM a � 117 ' _ jow wrImA► _.+w. -� �--+.. � �` ...— .�.....• -.��. ems- jF� ; I r ,J .4 m C� INORT CITY OF RANC�D CUCArvjONGA Al PLANNING DIVSK.N F-XiqlmT, SCALD-, m CITY Or. RAINCHO CUcAi'VloNGA Tr.rLE, PLANNING DIVIMM f_XI4.IMT.- _j �15 a r RESOLuION NO. A RESOLV ION OF THE RANCHO CU,.'AMONGA'PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE P,.RMIT NO. 87.11 FOR ELKS LODGE NO.. 1570 LOr4TED AT 8696 UTICA AVENUE IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT : ` APN: 209 -Vf -1$ WHEREAS, on the 3rd day of April, 1987, a complete application was filed by Elks Lodge No. 2570 for reviept of the above - described protect; and WHEREAS, on the ;..22nd day of April, 1987, th'e Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public :hearing 'to consider the above - described prof nat. NOW, THERFF ; E, the Rancho Cuca, ur1ga Pl a aning Commission resol,ied as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed nse is In accord with the Ger_ral Alan, the objectives of tree Industrial Specific Plan and Development Cede, and ,the purpose` of the district in which the site is 'located. 2, That the proposed use, together with th6— :onditions app?,icable thereto,- will not I* detrimer.tal to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvem.^nts in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use t.omplies with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan and oevelopment Code. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the env,ercnment and ,oat a Negative Declaration is issued on April 22, 1987. - SECiiON 3; That Conditional Use Permit No. 87 -11 is approved subject .. 7W_T TT wing conditions: 1. This approval shall run with the applicant and shall become void upon a change of ownership, or the ut, ceases. 2. The site shall be developed in accordance with the approved plans on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and Industrial Area Specific Plan regulations, Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, 0 1 conditions of approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner and Building Official. Resolution No. CUP 87 -11 - Elks Lodge April 22, 1987 Page 2 Auk 3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance - with all Iisections of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, al,/ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable community plans or specific plans in effect ai( the time of occupancy. Jj 4. Any sign�i proposed for this Conditional Use Permit shall' , ee designed in conformance with ..the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance and shall regdire review a� approval by the Planning Division prior to ins a- Iation of such signs. F If the operation of this Lodge causes adverse affects upon adjacent businesses or operations, the Conditional Use Permit shall, brought before the Planning Commission for their consideration and possible termination of such use. b. Public assemblk or large group meetings (50+ persons), shall not ccmmence until such time as C.1 Uniform Building —Code and State Fire Karshall`.1 Regulations; have been complied_ =with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Foothill Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compiiancp. The building shall be inspectyd for compliance prior to occupancy. 7. The building may be used for lmdle meetings and large group functions only on 9, Pday and Sunday and after 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. Lunch meetings and other activity conducted during daytime business hours must not be disruptive to surrounding business and may not u5., more than 15 parking spaces. `•aPROVED AND ADOP'MD THIS 22ND DAY OF APRIL;, 1987.. PLANNING COAiMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: tarry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary Resolution Rd. 7,_� , CUP 87-11 -. Elks ! sldse Aprr.l 22, 1987 Page 3 I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secrettry' of t!a Planning Commission of the City of Rari -,a Cucamonga, do 'hereby certify that the fc.vgoing Resolution was ,duly and regyrlarly introduced, passed, "'and adoptad by the Planrr:ng Commission of the Ci4*0 Rancho Cucamonga, at a regulsr meeting of the Planning Commission held on the ?2nd day of April;, 1987, by,the followirso aoLetio -wit: AYES: COMMISSIOWERS: NOES: COMNISSIDt;09: ABSEfiT: CGMiII$SIt?NE?i5 r e r� Ir ,4 r. C i k e. F E DATE: TO: FROM: BY; SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT j R 1 01 fl' Q IiZ April 22 19PY 1977 Chairman_a6d M�;nbers .', the Planning Cmission Brad Buller, City P1anepGM Cindy Norris, Assistant Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASS €SSMEN3 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -14 - request a es an g s , a ;�tRi square foot church 4thin an existing 12,960 square foot multi - tenint *. ndustrial facilityin the Genera's Industrial Land Use District (Subarea 3)„ located at 952::1 -A Business Center Drina - APH 205- 021 -39. 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. fiction Res jested: Approv,)Y of a Nan- Constructi or. Conditional Use Permit and Issuake of a Regative Declaration. E. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: ar - Single Family es e7�ial; Residential Lnw (2 -11 dwelling units per acre).. South Fklti- Tenant Industrial', Industrial Specific Plan, Subarea 3. East - Muiti- Tenant Industrial, Industrial Specific Plan, Subarea 3. West - Industrial - Manufacturing, Industrial Specific Plan, Subarea 3. C. General Plan Designations-. rol ?11e = eneral Industrial North - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units /acre). South - General Industrial East - General industrial Wes.' C- aneral Industrial O. Site Ch?racteristicst The site consists of a single unit within an f-.xTs ing m-ul ti- tenant industrial complex, consistin of 20 bui' Sings on approximately 20.7 ac: es, which has been f,iily Improved aid landscaped. E. Aopiicable Regulations: The proposed use is classified as a c urc d faclilty '- wwhicEi is a catiditionally permitted use in Subarea 3 of the Industrial Specific Plan. ITEM K i PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP87 -14 NEW HOPE CHURCH April 22, 1987 Page 2 11. ANAL �'SI;S' _ A. General: The New Hope Church ,,swill be occupying 6764 square ei a of building 9 which has a total lease space of 12,860 sq. ft., (Exhibit "B ") The applicant intands to rise the facility as an office Monday thru Friday from the hours of 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Religious assembly and other group activities ill occur on Sundays week nights after 6:30 p.m, and on Sundays. The major issues related to institutional uses in an indw3trial` facility are compatibility and parking. B. Compatibility: The tenants which arQ imediately adjacent to etTi — Oropas`3;Tacility in buildings 8, 9 and 10 Include custom manufacturing, light.; wholesale storage and distri4ution, and office related gsers with primary working, hours from 8:W, a.m. to 5:30 p.m.,,: (Exh.Ol t "C"). Therefore, the applicant's weekday activities 3e consistent with existing on site uses, and their religious Ind group rel.ated'funct`rons, which Ore held during.weekend and evening hours should not present a conflict. C. Parking: The -Cucamonga Business Z'drk, has 855 total pprkinq spaces available, (11295), with 17.C,,;r ^s directly adjacent: to the proposed church facility, ,:Exhibit "By). During rEg��*ar business hours, the applicant m:,y utilize up to 17 parking, spaces based on a leas*, space of 6,764 square feet,, (1/4003'. For religious assembly and group activities., 105 spaces will be required, based on a potential sanrt4► y area of 3,03 so. ft., (1/35), as_shcwn in B,hibit "Do. since adjacent tenants In the park do 666 have weekend or evening hours, there should rat bE a conflict with parking. D. Environmental Assessment: Upou reviewing fart I of the initial an ca'ap e . net II off. the Environmental ChEcklist, staff has fc[t.1 no siDgificant enviromental impacts as a result of this proposal:, III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: 1. That the proposed use is in accordance with the Genera', Plan, the objectives of Vie Development Code, and the purposes of the Industrial Specifi'x 1-1,111an Subarea 3, as evidenced by the Conditional Use Per;�A provi3ion for religious assemly. k -Z PLANNING CtN AIASIOU STAFF REPORT 1, 1 CUF87 -14 - NEW HOPE CHURCH (�1, April 22, 1987 Page 3 c 2. That the proposed use, `together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or wttlare, or materially 173urious to properties or improvements in tfi Vic . nity. - - i 3\\ That the proposed use complies with each of the ,applicable prdvtsrons of the Industrial Specific Wan. - 4. -That sufficient parkfng s available for the proposed use and surrounding tenants. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advekised as a public hearing in The a Ty :e ort newspaper, the property posted, and notices sent co -alt properry owners and tenants within 390 feet of the property. V. RECOMMEMATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission issue a Regat ve Declaration and approve Conditional Use Permit 87- 14 through adoption 'f the attached Resolution and Conditions of Approval. Respectfully sunraitted, Brad Buller City Planner 8B:CN:ns Attachments: Exhibit Letter - Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site 1Sap Exhibit "C" - Tenant List Exhibit "D" - Floor Plan k- �. `'- March 31, 1987 Planning D4partmen *_ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA P.O. Ba% 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 _ RE: Conditional Use Permit New Hope Community Church 9521 -A Business Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga Gentlemen: The fallowing is an explanation of the proposed Artists in Christian Testimony /New Hope Community Church activities within Cucamonga Business Park. The facility will serve two functions: The €irst,,will be the administrative business office for the ch;irch. Business office hours will be from approximately, 8:30 MI to 4:30 PM on weekdays. Those activities will be typical of a general business office, i.e., secretarial, accounting and managerial functions. The business office staff on weekdays will consist of two full time persons and one part time person. The second function will be to serve as a facility to conduct church related activities such aa. chur,:h services at 9:30 Awl and i1-00 AM on Sundays and oceassional church socials such as pot luck dinners. At present the current number of parishners is approximately 55 per church service. Any activities such as church socials, if they were to fall on a weekday, would generally begin after 6 :30 PM. We have investigated the parking situation and it appears, to be ideal in that the church activities are almost all: at off hour times. thc- refore not creating a negative impact on parking. ?',eiter Development Company, the owner oi'. Cucamonga Business. Park, has indicated that this arrangement:_ has been very positive with the churches they have had as tenants in the past, because it represents, efficient use of the sppace within the business park making extra parking available dtirzng the week to the tenants who ary 1 k- Wage 2 � Planking, De�p'tpent /� , open during regular �-)Up �ness hot ra> qa er Co. has aI t- Development ? indicate(Y that they have. had - several churches as l tenarr:tI, a�i 71he past �t the same tills and i4 has worked � i ouL very wolf. t 3 We as a congregation conk forard t this facility arf a church and some,tt;tng very important s that a have a " , r relationship with the neighboring tenai -A. , k P We will be happy to provide any, further:,informati',on if rr,quired. S4ncerely, ' Terry Hofe, Assistant Pastor /fj IF� j = Par.I Par.2 a I PaoS 1, ;, q r •.. s x�•b Y��I� � r ° sue" Q• '. "Y• Yf�" s.a n,a.a. .�. ® y pa .5 Poq! 7 44ACAV i 16 923 K 701 .sG w% _ q� r I �� €�1 CITY CAF rrM.: WE RANCHO CUCADvIONGA - .: AA 011� l PLANNING IYVEIaN - G. l t Part yr a ssac n . -,65 p.M• . Par$ .•.� s.oasG 2 IV AC 14 20"C at.r.M/� I J :.CI j = Par.I Par.2 a I PaoS 1, ;, q r •.. s x�•b Y��I� � r ° sue" Q• '. "Y• Yf�" s.a n,a.a. .�. ® y pa .5 Poq! 7 44ACAV i 16 923 K 701 .sG w% _ q� r I �� €�1 CITY CAF rrM.: WE RANCHO CUCADvIONGA - .: AA 011� l PLANNING IYVEIaN - G. l t c� tai jr o a JIM a '•.� I j �I �mmmniuimm}m i # I C � JTr 1 =„ � le CITY OF j rrwt UP 27- l RANCHO CUCANr PY.AWNO DP +'LSK N EXHINT =--.Z SCAM ADJACENT TEIfi%ft`,: 7ITHIN 300 RADIOS Building it 9567 Arrow Suite G Department of Youth Authority 8:30 - 5;00 p.m. Suite R Vin -iyaird Sark 8.30 - 6:00 p.m. Suite J Bcarosian Civil Engineering - 8x30 - 5;00 p.m. Suite K Video Enterprises 8:30 - 5 ;00 P.M. Suite L La Petite Bakery 8:00 - 6:00 p.m. Suite M Falcon Demolition S OO - 5 :00 p.m. Suite S1` &ccounting Plus 8:30 - 5;30 p.m. Suite P Mandy Corp. 8:00 - 5:00 P.M. Building 6, 9605 Arrow a Suite A Molody Mellis 8:30 - 6:31 p.m. Suite B Computer Supply 8:30 - 500 p.m. Suites C.D,E ATF - Davidson 8:30 - Sr00 p.m. Suite F Metros 8 :30 - 3:00 p.m. Suite G,H.a Harry JI.AAns Video 5:30 - 5 :00 p.m. Buildinc 7, 9507 Arrow Suite A General Marble 8.00 - 5,30 p.m. Building L, 9513 Business Center Drive Suite A • Rancho Pipeii'.a 8 :00 - .5:00 P.M. Suite B, C Vacant Suata D Vacant Suite E Logetronics 8 :30 - 5.30 p.m. Suite F Wilbur's Painting 7:33 - 5:30 p.m. S'ziteG -1 Vacant Suite G -2 Storage Suite H Retroapsct 8:30 - 5:00 P.M. Suite J & R Omni 8 :30 - 5:30+p.m. Building a, 11 Business Center Drive Suite A Proposer[ Church - Artists in Christian Testimony /New Hope Church suite B LSJ Interiors 8 :00 - 5 :00 p.m. Suite C, '.. Brubar Concepts 8 :00 - 5 :30 p.m. Buildin.: .:4 9541 Business Center Drive Suite A Mountain View Mortgage 8:00 - 5;30 p.m. Suits B MSC 8:00 - 5:30 p.m. Suite C Tandy 8 :00 - 5 :30 £•.m. ' Nui,.e .nq 11, 9565 Ctintei` :rive AA Suite A R & R Engineering 8 :00 - 5:30 p.m. qW Suite B Lon Angeles Times 2;00 a.m. - 8:00 a.m. Suite C & D RSK Const,tuctson 7;00 - 6:60 p.m. Suite E Martel BUIliness Center Accounting 8:30 - 515-n p.m., Suite G Vacant V I RL A04hd PAM am MAW &0 0701-02 0 4 -22 -87 PC Agenda 3 k -1, �• L__- r F x PO'�GNt"tgL � ?IiGYUi'3RY SpgG:= � •� � i� +'¢�. NORTi- CITY Of. ULM: RANCHO C,CAilvlo GA ��► PLANNING r N EXH113 . 5CALc , v....e....,,._._. �i� I RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMISSION APPgOVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 87 -14 FOR NEW HOPE CHURCH LOCATED AT 9521 -A BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE IN THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC 'PLAN AISTRICf, SUBAREA 3 WHEREAS, on the-3lct 6y of March, 1987, a Complete application. was filed by Roger Anderson for revt"_w oi,'r the above- described project; and WHEREAS, on the 22nd day' %of April, 1987, the Rancho Cucamonga, , Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above- described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: _ SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: j 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the Gene �l Plan, the objectives of the Industrial Spec.fic O, ,A and Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which thN site is located. 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Pian and Development Code. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adversa impacts on the environmenf—a-FTWat a Negative Declaration is issued o4 April 22, 1987. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 87 -14 is approved subject i,p e o awing conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. This approval shall run with the applicant and shall become null and void upon a change of ownership, or if the business operation ceases. is 2. Any modification, expansion, or other change in operation, << including day care, will require a revision to the f f" Conditional Use Permit. ;j Resolution No. C',,P 87 -14 - NEV HOPE CH�tr;;H April 22, 1987 Page 2 3. Approval of this request_IsAall not waive compliance with all sections of the Industrial Specific Plan, all other applicable City. Ordinances and any community or specific plans in effect at the time of occupancy.--.-,,. 4. All signage proposed for this Conditia,.. �fse PerM3t shall be designed in conformance with the City`s Sign ._.. finance and shall require: review and ,approval by the Pldnnisg Division prior to installation. 5. If the operation of this Conditional Use Permit car�ses adverse effects to neighboring businesses, the Conditional ` Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for their review and possible termination of the use. F 6. Plans shall be submitted to the Foothill Fire Department and Building and Safety Division for their review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 1. A seating. diagram for the sanctuary with the type of seating illustrated. 2. The proposed use for each room, including ages of children using each room. 7. T building may be used for religious ass(.nbly and other Ia,je group (50+ persons) activiities on Saturdays and Sundays and after 6 :30 p.n. on week nights upon completion of all improvements required by building and fire codes to the satisfaction of the Building & Safety Division and Foothill Fire Protection District. 8. Preschools or schools are not allowed oy this permit; 1 however., this shall not preclude nurseries or Sunday' School during the hours of religious or group assembly. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF APRIL, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: tarry t. mcNiet, unairman ATTEST: u er, Deputy SeErefary -11 Resol uti On' 0, CUP 87 -14 - NEW HOPE CHURClt April 22, 19$7 R Page 3 e I, Brad Buller, Deputy' Secretary: of the Planning ` tosaaissioo of the Ciiy of Ransho Cuc&mvnga, do hsi�e4v certify that the foregoii.' ResoUtion was .duly and reij)larly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the Ciiy of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning -Cr mission held on the 22nd day of April 1987, by the fallowing vote -to -wit: •x AYES: COMMISSIONERSs y h10ES;v, COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: s { IE DATE: TO; FROM: BY: SUBJECT: _ _ _ vi i J. STAFF REPORT yr avcur�iav vuvn.artvavuri G;j(;p;y�0� w , April 22, 1987 U t9'a'r u L Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Bruce Cook, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AXD TENTATIVE TRACT 13305 - LEWIS rtumts - ►ne zozat eevetopment of a resiaenctai sutlaivlsion or 8.08 .ar"gs within the Terra Vista Planned Community (Low- Medi'u!! Besidentlal, 4.8 dwelling units pet, acre) into 48 1,, „ts, located on the southwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain View Drive - APR: 227 - 151 -13. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Arcion Requested: The approval of the subdivision map, Zo-nceptual plot plan, conceptual grading plan, conceptual landscape plan, and building elevations for the development of 48 single - family h %*s, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Project Density: 6.8 dwelling units per acre. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: Noorth - vacant, planned as single- •family homes; Low- Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) within the Terra Vista Planned Community.. South - Vacant, planned as single- family homes; Low - Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) within , t1* — Terra Vista Planned Community. East - Vacant, planned as single - family homes; Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) within the Terra Vista Planned Community. West - Vacant, planned as school /park site; Elementary School /Park within the Terra. Vista Planned Community. D. General Plan Designations: Prod eclr X11 -e Low - medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre). North - Low - Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre). South - Low - Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre). East - `.ow- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), West - Lots- Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre). ITEM L PLANNING CO kiSSION STAFF REPORT TT 13305 - t,ewis Homes April 22, 11187 .Page 2 'r. f E. Site Characteristics: The project area is bordered to the W and east y erra Vista Parkway, to the south and east by Mountain View Drive and to the west by a future park /school site. The Trail( °System (trail type "0 ", see attached exhibit i fl ) nbutts this tract along its westerly perimeter. The site slopes from north to south at approximately a 3% grade. The - sitit is bisected in a north to south direction by a natural 'structures, drainit swaie. No significant natural landforms i or vegetation currently exist on the site. II. ANALYST; >: A. General: )Id_s tract is bordered along its westerly perimeter �y a Type "D^ Trail. The Trait System is a key, unifying elealent of the Terra Vista Planned Community. The proposed minimum lot size is 4,000 sqjare feet, with an average lot area of 5,100 square feet. In the past it has been the policy of " the Planning Commission to require full front yard landscaping provided by the developer and decorative hard9cape treatment applied to the driveway for all projects with a designated minimum tot area of 4,500 square feet or less. Lewis Nmaes has proposed development of this tract with their "Oxford" Series. The Oxford Series incorporates element.; o "old english" architecture using steep pitched roofs with a heavy tile structure and extensive use of wood trim on stucco siding. Five house plans are proposed_ two one-story plans and three two-story plans. The Oxford Series has been previously approved by the Planning Commission and `has-been constructed with-tract, 12670. The Oxford Series is also being proposed for TepUtive Tract 13304 and Tract 12802 (amended). This project is the first project proposed for development within the northeast quadrant of the Terra Vista Planned Community. The northeast quadrant of Terra -Vista is that portion of the Planned Community south of Base tine Road and north of the Greenway spine between Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue. The Area Development Plan for this portion of Terra Vista is on the agenda of tonight's meeting for the review and consideration of the Pianring Commission (refer to Item "M "). B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Tolstoy, er c , u er rev—le-w-0 this project at the Committee meeting of April 2, 1487, The Committee expressed concern over the lack of cul-de-sacs siding onto Terra Vista Parkway from the tract, but realized the impracticality of this design due to 1' the small size and unusual configuration of this particular s L PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 13305 - Lewis Homes April 22, 1987 Page 3 site.. However, the Committee strongly emphasized the need for the incorporation of side -on cul-de-sacs where ever possible in the planning of future single family projects along Terra Vista Parkway, The Committee did recommend approval of this project, subject to ne , o rowing: 1. The provision of a larger property line radius at the intersection of Terra Vista parkway and Mountain View Drive to permit improved visibility and better landscaping on the street side of the property line wall. The intersection treatment applied here should be simiiarily applied to the other three corners of this intersection as they drYelop, 2, -'_ae provision of block walls at all lot,, which rear onto the elementary school site and park sites, as well as along the sides of the green space opening from the tract to the park site. These items have boon included as Conditions of Approval on the attached Resolution. (See Conditions 11, 12 & 13 of °Design Review'.) C. Street Improvements: At "the last Planning Commission meeting, Lewis Homes expressed disagreement with a !condition requiring the construction of Milliken A,_nue from Foothill Boulevard to Base Line Road for Tentative Tract 13270. Prompted by this action, staff has prepared the following exhibits to explain staff's concern` with circulation in Terra Vista. Exhibit "I" shows the status' of projects within Terra Vista, the status of street improvements within Terra Vista, and the improvements required for this Trait, Exhibit "d" contains a preliminary plan for the construction of major streets adjacent to and within Terra Vista. It designates what portion of the major street shall be constructed with development in a given subarea. D. Technical Revieur Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed the pre ec an Ue ermined that, with the recommended Conditions of Approval, the project is consistent with all applicable standards and ordinances. E. Grading Committee: The Grading Committee has reviewed the project and determined that, with the recommended Conditions of Approval, the project is consistent with all applicable Standards and Ordinances, L-3 PLANNING CWMISSA STAFF WORT TT 13305 Lgvis Roams t.' April 22, 10Z! Page 4 F. Envitonm6ntal Assessmnt: Part I of the Initial Study has been comp eted by " the app can .. Staff has completed Part II of the EnOronmantai Clhecklist and found ao significant ihipacts on the ,environment as a result of this project, III. FACTS FOIL FINDINGS: In order for this project to be approved, the annt n man must find this project to be consistent with the Terra Vista Planned Community and the General Plan, and that this project' will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause toignif[cant adverse impacts, It must also be determined that the proposed use, building designs, and subdivision, together with the recommended Conditions, of Approval are in compliance with all applicable regulations in thzzlevelopment Code and the Terra Vista Community Plan, IV. CORRESPOWENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing n e a. a ort newspaper, the property posted, and notices were sertit to all property owners within 300 feet of the Project site. V. RECOWNDATION• Staff recommends that the Planning Cowl ssion approve en a� ve :Tract 13305, subject to the Conditions of Approval, through adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Decl�;ration. tesp ctfully s *; led, Bra BOanner, City P BB:BC :vC - Attachments: Exhibit "ho - Location Map Exhibit "8" - Area Development Plan for Northeast Quadrant Exhibit "C" — Subdivision Map Exhibit "D" - Site Plan Exhibit "E" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "F" - Conceptual Landscape Plan. Exhibit "G" - Building Elevations Exhibit "N" - Type "D" Trail Exhibit "I" - Street Improvements for Project Exhibit "J" - Area Improvement Boundaries Resolution of Approval with Conditions /a•- , 1 `rte uma NIP No 1; z I!, .06 14 .-Slit ,g U > ss u 71 Ll 44 A 0,., ml IL {g t t d � as � .•�_ .° ,a sit Is n ,E = as ; �3 1 I�t � • i ji► a K (q S Vl N y' • �r� ...� 1. `•: `'V .tip I vl? r - tA b i y u za xm� MAN A- �°'ii1i V � fit 2AM -Oo ,. rt 'ZAP -Oo ,. tf tl &.10-7 r5 :5 U > OX 'ZAP 47 9 tf tl &.10-7 r5 :5 U > OX ag al aim C, *I u j! -'! too, KM, 1; ., V.4 Wal 'Ox -M munull 1P iul! FiFiFEElEE k.21 /* to u z 84 - .1Z I KM, 1; ., V.4 Wal 'Ox -M munull 1P iul! FiFiFEElEE k.21 /* to u coo a a VA"A vam kvwAl*,^v4m VI L17a^.d y+� g�11Gi. 9SM37r� ma vte t »KV w w u +� rxa ]n4rtllu wu ]arw/vxa ew�v F t yiftiA Y911a awwvxo arvwmmiu # '�" i3lai #Si lf. �8tii rk i � ♦n. �' '. xMw F rii J;+ 1 2 x t,ti� o KI ,13304 : _.- -.-• -- —^ °' i w 'p y:' _ t• c,a o z ■ � w $ ^ ul .Y y X ``1� Ay, j'+ A &t 4 _ Bit it eju � � .if '`.'` 1 � C ���,,,(((►►► �� H ��� e n 1! 1 \ J 1 It � „�."cr: VAiKWAV tot. K O t ID lit Vk iii Aso u - iii '" - � � Est •..,_ f � x � -t uI `• 3I1Y0 "lOI:ONYOIU 4M]NVY ...� -'�^ _ � YX 21y �j ta�gM wNNVt] »Mli saliai Niv ��-'� +�� _�� tMtl 'ON 1]VV11011Y2N]:. W._. 111/'lal ialY.7LpNYZY k #. � VtOtA Yt1s711 1VI11i71O1t0o �� t A, {NM+na w �aMGM NNItWJ 9+iifat ! � �' n 1! 1 \ J 1 It � „�."cr: VAiKWAV tot. K O t ID lit Vk iii Aso u - iii '" - � � Est •..,_ f � x � -t uI `• 3I1Y0 "lOI:ONYOIU 4M]NVY ...� -'�^ _ � YX 21y �j ta�gM wNNVt] »Mli saliai Niv ��-'� +�� _�� tMtl 'ON 1]VV11011Y2N]:. W._. 111/'lal ialY.7LpNYZY k #. � VtOtA Yt1s711 1VI11i71O1t0o _ saee�iro�iaara�e,ma � � sNtl�'iru7s Y4ta trit � [Ms S , - � n.m> •N uewr uw�¢ wb� � 4 1 < P;'iY 3r r; !i Fll� � ate i I -13 l 41 k^ { ss� � ff c U B 1) E E3 Fll� � ate i I -13 l 41 k^ { ss� � ff c U f f }i t: �,-_....i Ik i'vil T , r1 U > V �a I W. Ir I el ±'a . �... �_ wwrw asv - wer fan �se.q � � M� N rl I u Lr� 0 00 W > w c 00 Z W L— It ra a � _I z 0 Lr--- L>u .j LLI L-r= L- V DD 0 lopoo. W O E i (H 13 err f .j U e � o ox z u i { new � qaw� rtieor awu tl ar!rrAar�ia,r� wa »rMia.rr�ea�e �PIG►AMliaflitA'i80Y,t�1 - ` f .j U e � o ox z u i { M � �g M O Q C E `V r `M T C T M 1Z m a Cos. g� -v I..- ;LP W� gilt � a - � W i N y d rao tiW � z :m ci y M m �- J2 `o r i'� 7 r m� I..- ;LP W� gilt � a - � W i N y d rao tiW � z :m ci y M m �- J2 0 M M NC M i� i Wwr =Recorded PROJECT STATUS- =In Process STREET STMUS �Existing Pavement = =Required for this Project CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGDTEEMG noN a LEGEND N -Area boundary p� = WW 15 p 1 Area number 5"" `/ AREA 1 CONSTRUCTION LIMITS Foothill - Haven to Spruce Haven Foothill 2 add - to To%n Center Foothill - Haven to Milliken. 3 Foothill - haven to Rochester 4 Rochester - Foothill to Poplar 5 Rochester - Foothill to Church C Rochester - Church ro Base Line 7 Base Line - Millike6 to Rochester a Base Line - Milliken to Mountain View 9 Same as adjacent area depending upon where access is taken. ?4 Milliken - Foothill to Base Line 11 Spruce - Foothill to Elm 12 Most -o£ this area is already conditioned or developed. 13 Haven - Church to Base Line GEMERAL RULES 1 All projects shall construct adjacent streets full width to include curb on the ,uposite side. 2 Streets shall be extended (full width) off -site far enough to provide two means of access. 3 Corner properties shall construct major streets per both adjacent areas. 4115/ &7 CITY WX RANCHO CUCAMGNGA -rag s rams _ AREA �'� � • TMPR�y�MEhf�' t4n�raQ! �� L -23 !i 9 RESOLUTION NO.. A RESOLUTION OF, THE KANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM0 A, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTACIVE TRACT MO NO. 13305 AND .DESIGN REVIEW THEREOF WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 13305, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Lewis Homes, applicant, for the purpose of ..subdividing the r2al property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State,of California, described as 8.08- =acres in the Low LMedium Residential District (4- 8 dwelling units per acre) within the Terra Vista Planned Community located on the southwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain View Drive, into 48 Tots, regularly came before the Planning %�umrissioaa for public boring and action on April 22, 1987; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommerided approval: of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission nau read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports, and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows; SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to _en a ve Tract No. 13305 and the Map thereof- (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Develorent Code, and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is riot likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable -injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative trac will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. t. -�.� �r RESOLUTION NO_. IT 13305 - Lewis Homes April 22, 1947 Page 2 AL (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on ° the environment and a Negative Declaration is,- issued. t , SECTION 2.,; YEhtativp Tract Map No. 13305 and Design Review thereof, a copy o w zc s attached,- ,5ereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the n following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: t Design R1:v ew `! 1.- Each lot within the project shall have a minimscm rear yard crpan area from buit,ing to property line, or slopes / retaining wall of E 15' wfth a 2% sli ;4r-ar Tess. A final . tailed site plan' 0al1 be _submitted for iti- tom .avid approval of the City Pl4riner FrYt r to issuance of building permits. 2. Front yard landscaping is to be provided by the developer for All lots. Each lot shall be prow {ded with a minimum of two 15 -- gallon trees in addition to street trees, shrubbery, ground cover, and lawn planted in combination to provide a pleasing and aesthetic environment. All lots shall be provided with a permanent, underground irrigation system. Final detains shall be included �.w landscape /irrigation plans to be submitted for the review and approval of the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. ; 3. Each driveway shall receive special treatment in order to enhance the appearance of the street scene. Such treatment may include a band of brick, special concrete or border:,,tr,2atmeIhts in like materials. Thr -- .'lveway hardscape details shall be subject to the review ano approval of the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Corner sideyard fencing for all corner lots shall be constructed of a decorative block material, Details of the wall design shall be included on the submitted landscape /irrigation plans, and shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Planner. 5. Corner, sideyard fencing and /or retaining wall shall be set back a minimum distance of sr' from the back sidewalks, All retaining walls exposed to public view shall be constructed of a decorative block. 6. For all corner lot,:., the side yard betfeen the ','idewalk and the sideyard fencing shall to landscaped and irrigated by the:; developer. i I. All wood fencing installed by the developer shall have any street facing Exposures treated either with watee sealant, stain, or painted. ; RESOLUTION NO. TT 13305 - Lewis Homes April 22, 1987 Page 3 8. Upgrade treatments shall be provided for any side or rear building elevation; that is exposed to view from any public right -of -way. Plans detailing the ea;tent of this upgrade treatment and to what lots they are ttaD be applied shall be submitted for the review and approval of the City.Pianner prior to issuance of any building permits. 9. A complete and detail ed f €,.;ci ng plan including both perimeter and landscape/irrigation enationplans and ashall 6 e e Ircludl -on the subject Et the review and approval of the City Planner prior to the issuance of build,:ng permits. 1G Six foot Sigh masonary walls Consistent with to existing design for perimeter walls within the Terra Wsta Planned Community shall be provided a jng the tract per,;11 eters adjacent to both Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain Views ';five. These wails shall be staggered and offset to increase visual interest. landscape maintenance easements will be required where perimeter wall's encroach onto private lov -s, and are to be dedicated on the final map. Final plotting of all fences and locations of all easements are to be determined prior to recordation of the inal map. ii. A 6' high decorative block wall shall be provided along the tracts westerly 'r2rimeter' where rear property lines lie adjacent to the school /park site. This block wall shall continue along he north g property line of lot 14 any' shall coti nve to a point equal ter the front plane of the 1 i vi lh;,' area of the house. A 6' high decorative wrought iron fence shall continuefrom this point to the back of the sidewalk. 12. A 6' high decorative block wall sh:i!l be constructed along the westerly side lot line of lot 15 t';. ^ -a the intersection of -this side lot line with the rear property line of said lot to the point where this wall will intersect with the return fencing from the garage to the side lot line. A 6' high decorative wrought iron fence shall be provided along the westerly property line of lot 15 from the point of termination of the clock wall to the intersection of the side lot line with the southerly lot line of lot 15. The wrought iron fence will continue along the southerly lot line to its r A nt of termination at the back of sidewalk. 13. A larger property line radius shall be provided at the intersection of Terra Vista Parkway and 1Mountain View Drive to permit intensified landscaping treatment on the street side of the property line wall to enhance the visual quality of the street scene. The exact configuration of this property line radius shall be subject to the review and approval of both the City Planner and the City Engineer, RESOLUT10 NO, TT 23305 - Lewis Homes April 22, 1987 Page 4 ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy SecreRry L_ Tentat ye Tract 1. Notice of intention to `form and/or loin the lighting and landscaping. district shall be filed with the City Council prior to recordation of the map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, 2. Terra Vista Master Pan Storm Drain Line 4 -1 shall be constructed from Terra Vista Parkway to Deer Creek Flood Control Channel to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to occupar -y of any buildings. 3. The following reets shall be _.constructed -Full width for the stated iimitl bXcept that offsite sidewalks and parkway landscaping;' be deferred until development of the adjacent property. a. Milliken Avenue from Base Line Road to Foothill Boulevard including landscaped median, b. Terra Vista Parkway from Milliken Avenue to Mountain View Drive including landscaped median, and c. Mountain View Drive from Milliken Avenue to Terra Vista Parkway, 4. Prior to recordation of the final map, a drainage study shall be prr••ided to and approved by the City Engineer der�:onstrating h1w the entire portion of Terra Vista east of Milliken Avenue will' be protected from drapnage from the north. If increased flows are to be directed to ochester Avenue, the report shall analyze needed protection measures for downstream properties. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF APRIL, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE erTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Ch Man ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy SecreRry L_ RESOLUTION NO. ' TT 13305 - Lewis ; Nome: + April 22 1987 Page 5 r j, Brad ,Buller, Deputy Secretary of the planning Camaission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duty and ,. regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by ttr,- Planning Comp fission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning kommission held on the 22nd day of April, 19187, by the fallowing vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: r. HOES= C9ISSIONERS ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: c: A I i L-2. Ij H 1 AM i sd a22 «:t. w-.._. 1•'.a .-a e Yen Q. �t _•..c. �° Yi � a° N�a si au. er °t LOa ci Oid1Y Ciy �N ppYiY O y V O Y �H/^�// 3 1 CRy4q�: 0 9 y D V �U f t pL y O b ff L 6 C'u �4Q Y`.a� VOOM E YC LYyL C Y SZ;V GTV�N pa .L^ qW Oaf �YG t�. p•�:� zt- .-.is- C{y� UO 6 �••L tR1Y 7Cy �� Ul GG�Ny p; ^.0 w.O Ey...�N GG €g� • ♦ `s`O °LY tlI• �J °LgQ�YO 3154.E e+�C'.�•w C^ 9 �ry4: O ".cam A'! r i j-.3 ^i GKC sau v #o .•e.. �xw i.LYe oin.au� ._ _wx aN.'Y''�`o a FS IL p$' rs o G L r^ a >� e='�^ Ham•• C � °�cJ. o.G+• L�°.� °c ^Ra Q °y c"'3 e'r` °LLrY p. � _ °atL GC� =aVO V.0 ^ �� 9�j ��v ; ` + ■yy NCNC � /fir6CY0.V rcu NOh'Syi YJ:y YY�M�6 l�C��� C Y Lo w—ro $La�� V V 0 O �. V+� tf L °�� O• O+ �y+L •{J tiNU Ua °°z Nh is R w is ouo'n Iva: cv� s° ^o gYaw u tr•.'•i�i 80 0.2 ou I ° •. °. �o". °.2 � Nu '• NVs g Nw QQ[dr � a° _ + TT 2y9 IS s J A Y6 L q O ° a ^•CV OaC �YY.pN c cC 8. V j. �• 11 ��q N aQ° pp � _ 4 �•C ���U (.� ^COL rdN eG -• aRY� *a L2 v w ggggc Y Z gal �•6C�Q�a"a— o ti nr� C o o Too ��poNa�L�o J pap. Wt �� w: QYOC 'JpY�3�+0 .. •• [Lp� �yY1 I F G c q LN _P Z vi e0 MSC r Ij H 1 AM i Irl G ,rill Z t~.:) UA tX! 0 L-1 �.°, z'c ce ^a. ci°:ar �oa+ag $NtAuua�lpF ^CO iia �'GTa° a4Lm E °E me «P ^ �q«.° c � M o 6 A 6 O" _�aY 69 6 Y �NT ppii "q �.6zb' 0 6a LNN $ A oofiVa L BNB.. Y3' N T . o.^ o GyO^ N a� d a+ y s A'S jog �iwc�iy TC �$. A E tl� :: e 7 Lg L N L o �.°. wi. c q '" s Y y 3 O. UqG— O j N �Oc 0 0� Lq N. o °asp cypt^ I4ov Y.w�grQ w.a 6 V uvpd"rtiu 4 E.ai60. .00 60YS. '•SN NL a a S O AO isNu � ate[+. e ad gc Y �e 9"�VTgLOyy s ^0 ^ °$yOSY o °u aia uc .Y1► , $v �MNZL' au L NS °•Bi 'O �°+ s A i�w.a. �' 'ai.n ola ,v �€ nosy °N 113Y� �i. IuL�R, .�+� =^ ^°� °�a ��� �� Y� Ap 'd °u. 77 a+as•• M —A�-° p'G•+".1� t w. Y q M C Y •- '� L a^i Y .�. A LO mi vu N °NA� mL ai ° n L a v $ r ^ C` y O OHi = N Yy N CN B— A fl � ^� CA� CV L 3� p� 4 ate, s WY ° V� UN T 'QO C1aC .001 L 9 .$P� �Y ~� 9 d *2 i6 Ir .8U No 8 u`c N go. A 1L C�'T +. L i� cc Y.o CVL �L.,.. iL dne" rd Ff�o° p a F 5,; 1tn..°. LA ° N YC Y66 L Aw ` L d y CAAe"9 pC N N OfG C. GY�.L 7, 2 L ' Np Y9� LC '1+ �9G9 Q L A G OA 4 U,-: Ynn CCC'.'6C °N "LLONO.. C 6 O 2. a1 O C IT^ a a C N CV U N y 8 a A L " O° 1.- N2gVq TC TSB :5411 LL xbd ° n ��vOt CY C`Y �ON �O�' �U9`` 9C CB�WOp�o p�G CCU °G Gup ^u Zi . L C O �G 1�� A A C n °.ez0 ° Yi ." C 4 V. O G V L p C pg� G 01 f0 9 pL +$ °"� �F•O y u E tei0 'g�' L 10� n Y LIL+. ;D UYGOYD c71L LOO �%j 7. VS !°Y:a v+A R. 1iu ".,v 11 w P SO P N nrA oofiVa �Yw N T o a� �1n Tip N cuL �„ ... � V6gY NA CGp �tyY. �.YL � LYYyI Oy.0 L� OY1g6 MM ^ ^a ps Y W� " CC �• M� N, 3 Q nm C aLiA _ «n a� `w� 110- �..@Q n t a 6° `�.w� qv �' ` gv ems. O O— Y u 1° L u N � {{.� Ys C6 C'��Z yy NZ6 N M ! Y! ad gc Y �e 9"�VTgLOyy s ^0 ^ °$yOSY o °u aia uc .Y1► , $v �MNZL' au L NS °•Bi 'O �°+ s A i�w.a. �' 'ai.n ola ,v �€ nosy °N 113Y� �i. IuL�R, .�+� =^ ^°� °�a ��� �� Y� Ap 'd °u. 77 a+as•• M —A�-° p'G•+".1� t w. Y q M C Y •- '� L a^i Y .�. A LO mi vu N °NA� mL ai ° n L a v $ r ^ C` y O OHi = N Yy N CN B— A fl � ^� CA� CV L 3� p� 4 ate, s WY ° V� UN T 'QO C1aC .001 L 9 .$P� �Y ~� 9 d *2 i6 Ir .8U No 8 u`c N go. A 1L C�'T +. L i� cc Y.o CVL �L.,.. iL dne" rd Ff�o° p a F 5,; 1tn..°. LA ° N YC Y66 L Aw ` L d y CAAe"9 pC N N OfG C. GY�.L 7, 2 L ' Np Y9� LC '1+ �9G9 Q L A G OA 4 U,-: Ynn CCC'.'6C °N "LLONO.. C 6 O 2. a1 O C IT^ a a C N CV U N y 8 a A L " O° 1.- N2gVq TC TSB :5411 LL xbd ° n ��vOt CY C`Y �ON �O�' �U9`` 9C CB�WOp�o p�G CCU °G Gup ^u Zi . L C O �G 1�� A A C n °.ez0 ° Yi ." C 4 V. O G V L p C pg� G 01 f0 9 pL +$ °"� �F•O y u E tei0 'g�' L 10� n Y LIL+. ;D UYGOYD c71L LOO �%j 7. VS !°Y:a v+A R. 1iu ".,v 11 w P SO P N {{S� G. y yy O� OIL. tc gp _� As NE Y ny� i6p0 Y� 0.� y�LpQYp LA Y <�. VY�'O M ■V WC S 'O TLJ V'aaa> p N.4 Ld ���� ► q� qb YN LOY }qNC M6. ubCN F-3 _ G ,L, qoc- `= Nc a« �y. u ►E.'G° � a$ m�r_��v .2'�.:. r aM. OG. St. Ua.z q YZ 6 O CG} E.C. .^a "tL L 3.6 «OIj. d V T +i GLT Ob � LN.r C�RO " 6'. qO �ONG„G„�eE 64.. �' ►gNN.Y �CI 8 ° wL, J� 9fqCp�YO� t q L V► Ga0 N =. u dplL ►N U.�q ^. YS V�.,Nr N'GC�l� ✓O O. °u..lN}. ud --a aiL °,Q. �► r 4C 9 Y A IR p W`O i 0 O.: L Lyr �.yq Lq ►.d > *OL L ^° !> AAY.. Yom— LY v V� ya C N ► ►40 Off' y W YL6 �-� G.nOG 1Gf .CL LiL +eDD 4Z N0 .. q'gW_m ]� H G 11 M' 11 d ��pp' a °om o L ce 'a ► rb YCY ^ u OIY �u t qY o�oo b= vluiQq« C N cc b l> C L Cf =ugc Y- Y G a T u L p a q SO� ^Lpa 9 ►0 994 Y �O q^ A� w CVYQ HC Cf..L yL II S► O q�L� L N D L O. G N F �O q yU Y 0 9 C O 6 y C MC YyY V O:� Y = b V ► Gp N= �. yCl Yy _J 7 HY OD M` YV N �.0.• GY Ya. d V�yyAO ►y43 GY OC40N IN gC�O DYipMO�G yLLy =.N T Ca V C.��N �. 41 d�� �.l•. �G1 Ij �j~1r 4�C O.N Y�V � LG Yj.Gy N ► : 7 O Q= ^ OV O u 6♦ �. q N Ay. ti u R O C N N °J �D N ►G T �� G LQ L o (Z' O1gry uG N 1{ n ANG 00. R OCY pC.yy�E .ZitOYNY `N Lam. Q', «U. n it p 1pP \�N3.L WNOY nG ` �YEp tY� (`piapOf. yq 'c Nir. yew L....► PN p MnN n fir° Yl1bgV \V�Y GqT x <b N O�{ �> a1� N �' V� O1 ii�� qV OY- u~ ll{I{'L..���i YR N 0.�� ✓Y ~Vl � V{,. �R.NCq Z nNY °`x O +. YI"Y S+O dVCYY. rtii9q NY+L pq Oboir� �� ^�G ^qY �N� �N S. Fu+sG► �NV �CtT VIINGM1`N 3y.0 1�NC >P reN 60 l46 �O. K�u {eL.��ON {{S� G. y yy O� OIL. tc gp _� As NE Y ny� i6p0 Y� 0.� y�LpQYp LA Y <�. VY�'O M ■V WC S 'O TLJ V'aaa> p N.4 Ld ���� ► q� qb YN LOY }qNC M6. ubCN F-3 _ G ,L, qoc- `= Nc a« �y. u ►E.'G° � a$ m�r_��v .2'�.:. r aM. OG. St. Ua.z q YZ 6 O CG} E.C. .^a "tL L 3.6 «OIj. d V T +i GLT Ob � LN.r C�RO " 6'. qO �ONG„G„�eE 64.. �' ►gNN.Y �CI 8 ° wL, J� 9fqCp�YO� t q L V► Ga0 N =. u dplL ►N U.�q ^. YS V�.,Nr N'GC�l� ✓O O. °u..lN}. ud --a aiL °,Q. �► r 4C 9 Y A IR p W`O i 0 O.: L Lyr �.yq Lq ►.d > *OL L ^° !> AAY.. Yom— LY v V� ya C N ► ►40 Off' y W YL6 �-� G.nOG 1Gf .CL LiL +eDD 4Z N0 .. q'gW_m ]� H G 11 M' 11 C A b U + N J y y =C+ Y e L CVCS• ��.. 4 St C O Nb O �y Is $ o N YY LV 2stY Di 6�ntyA .;o v � V 4 yV. Y A t Y 0 + yy r �oVN se L ittlT '4 O� 4Vy P N Y O.0 Y'l, VP aEi u pN dY O� QSSY - 25 YaC � n lS Qi..t,Y � 4 tpSJ a Y. V• 4.T.+ C •�`�4 �. aNG C YY �p q6 Oy•p C � V� aY �y y 6 _q'DS JILOUg6 CC o �1. S c , n y m Y« Y _z, L.g ya «'• T. :AJ 7 GS4 �qA �iqC QNV Y °H haw �w= •> pgN p 6 Vd �COj C.UVY d �'�'Sr �.°. yACT +o a� .,yH y.Q «. ppCCO a wE•^LN M rC. 4Q C gL*Y�iS " v t 'S.iM .s O'On d �Y ";9 .Cn�M ��+w yLp i C C `SdN L q p A Y N °no a�u pp ` 4 A n'w _dCC V p u.Z e YG L .�N Lemffi ` =VC GViu M 6 C H R49 CC 1r-L pY «�p L L .2 M1�NG _rN+1•. Lp 44 d u N M> w E YYQ ✓� C A b U + N J y y =C+ Y e L CVCS• ��.. 4 St C O Nb O �y Is $ o N YY LV 2stY Di 6�ntyA .;o v � V 4 yV. Y A t Y 0 + yy r �oVN se L ittlT '4 O� 4Vy P N Y O.0 Y'l, VP aEi u pN ZZu ari wY V - 25 Ep E V ` � a Y. V• (Ct... C •.V•yi ... aNG C YY �p q6 Oy•p C � V� aY O y 6 _q'DS JILOUg6 CC o �1. S c , n N Y z Y�4a �� v QNV Y °H haw �w= •> pgN p L^ �i� ���'e �'�'Sr I =Wa 1CV. ap. L u'fV ' NdYO Y �.0 «C -Ls ari wY V - 25 Ep E Y N' � (Ct... •.V•yi ... aNG C YY �p q6 Oy•p C � Y 6 C N y Z4 y 6 C Y Y LU Cd ,�N OtY~ �� QNV Y °H haw �w= •> pgN �i� ���'e �'�'Sr �.°. +o a� v.�rn «. C «wd wVNC' O'On d �Y Yy0� .Cn�M ��+w yLp i C C `SdN L q p A Y N S Y N� L r X. Q N pp ` 4 A _dCC V p u.Z Q AG+ YG L .�N L`. .c. .x flT ` =VC GViu M 6 C j � EE•C Nqy Y Wd Ld♦ y� 0 d u N M> w E YYQ ✓� L��.•. u...? > MN L AY L NL Y�n Y�4 � L aaL N 6�L aV+ jy ' r + i � Mr C� �N« w.�°nu YC �o°m�� V6a V AA QpC E d Lt CC6r oO1r n9t -+_pa L` O �� C66S C r V N.2O Ou�d N> YC HMO VY .•. dCrU = C Y- C.A 4u O y� p +YCV� Cpp C QQ Y VYY..4L Yyia i +Y4 4- WE V.2 �.Y "'�Np Vy + wd� n0C V O�A�SA �GC O�aVi t� C ALS; VQ ar VOO p, s UAM °,gip R. R. 6 N w Y Q Y WY WC ,. 5 YJE E$ k4O E E 6 V �+V y N C � y til NI �1 I /v♦�I O O Z v Lt! 7 t'°O .. �.COC��. ��V��yyQQ{�cQ Nf+14L" tl b. � C •` 4 NO2iC YSY ,G ��.� a _e ZZ Lit L_6 IZ v �+Y.��i P"" i• �akb �voa'Zc 8 ya 9010 pqC. oU y w UZ V..g 2s gQC �eY t O Y y w M C t: Y O O� Y y�J N. ��gpffiYY _Y O WL C y LO ^ fu M C OO�W C qV2 \a G Lo yev is O LG� O14 O V WN4 W YV a a. In A. €« 19 s % r �:p= _a �N� ' M� ^q ii q�O OYjyy SaE,. R &-. N44 V� �y(e p ep�}G3e �es3�{ y{'° V 1 or L, vaB it g! MMa 1},04 MO s�O1 N$ y'Ss ^$�S o rn v rim w.+� !SH a'S^ $ q�� E¢° °.r "' yP'� u' a vS.w�. Fe we ns fii 6Z 0..9C =.V 6tn4 � f ■ A. y s 0 11 0 c,a LU 7 y wj$ =2W Y Y� M N O as pp c zgp�pp+v .g yq a° Imo`•" L O L Er ° y pn �.� o 1Y` o_ +.. C V .c u y ~i. I = °�J 9 T`Cw p �MYL CY^ Cyi S ■^ � « Y a� �_ a �Y^�°, D Ems° x `a Y4G% t} 1N 6^ SGC pL nvv VN4! YY 8O e �iW v zx-- iud yL� ��� 4NGa NqW A� !6W N Cwy EON O { L{11 G W� O a a..� c .� i Y q >• � •C V V a p u 1r V c .w �a in ¢ c in« �' <V ^ tl■CN4.^q O V = R ° So Y Ci M'y.3 ~ia4 N01 L Y` Y Op 3 ° b q y aN 3 y r M GM.a qi a T M f u L L O �� 4 O .` Y'I 6N. Y V O w°. TN .•'w 4016X41 4L ` ■^.� M E} pOtl ONe�a°. � N L L' nG 4 222 I 1 J YVC L� y6• Oy° = -H Cam gip° �o �q o r�t �°, �5 A€.. �- U �•- b C T ■O T� i C •�}n.O6 QC C0gf;,l. N V Y. V Y H '° «. M 0.V ^ .• c1 �.0 U ao L + � a $ii �a q$ 4° e a E 16< O'COL G^ �e� .11.44 � 4� u�Q p.GYy LI 01oYi a `K Ri «• g. C`1 _�N •§i �Y > CIY. °.O C ✓•G V;�y�OY NYC L ` V4a VC Nom.. uc a -N ^aW YNY �e �� a uEL� g cu 1^S iH .+4Q iN+� _ -71 $ ` �niL.N t�y1 YL �a° L� e v V NW ^Y gg ff° N a,-gW Y40Cp43y Y Y�jj to NOUM� NO 6M <U .. 4�. Wes. N.`LU :21 � I�NYW l6.•e m� Z y wj$ =2W Y Y� M N O as pp c zgp�pp+v .g yq a° Imo`•" L O L Er ° y pn �.� o 1Y` o_ +.. C V .c u y ~i. I = °�J 9 T`Cw p �MYL CY^ Cyi S ■^ � « Y a� �_ a �Y^�°, D Ems° x `a Y4G% t} 1N 6^ SGC pL nvv VN4! YY 8O e �iW v zx-- iud yL� ��� 4NGa NqW A� !6W N Cwy EON c M° V V a p u 1r V c .w �a in ¢ c in« ti Y u q ai yy+n-o y.� °O ec a� LNG x MC u i a Yur PN iz M ° fi t L Y ' I 1 J �c y wj$ =2W Y Y� M N O as pp c zgp�pp+v .g yq a° Imo`•" L O L Er ° y pn �.� o 1Y` o_ +.. C V .c u y ~i. I = °�J 9 T`Cw p �MYL CY^ Cyi S ■^ � « Y a� �_ a �Y^�°, D Ems° x `a Y4G% t} 1N 6^ SGC pL nvv VN4! YY 8O e �iW v zx-- iud yL� ��� 4NGa NqW A� !6W N Cwy EON c c .w �a 2 I X ' ak i a � Li H N ' I 1 J y wj$ =2W Y Y� M N O as pp c zgp�pp+v .g yq a° Imo`•" L O L Er ° y pn �.� o 1Y` o_ +.. C V .c u y ~i. I = °�J 9 T`Cw p �MYL CY^ Cyi S ■^ � « Y a� �_ a �Y^�°, D Ems° x `a Y4G% t} 1N 6^ SGC pL nvv VN4! YY 8O e �iW v zx-- iud yL� ��� 4NGa NqW A� !6W N Cwy EON w.�.. M O�� «. LL �t u N � ° pact �' ps a u "e M= v 4CA C pt C Q Z �a C.) IS.1 NA p 0. o`H �` 4 � � O y 0 Nr a�u'i + G a� ppV vQ� �v w.�.. M O�� Y c N � ° pact �' E o.i a u "e M= v alit n o Y � � L n Yy J Q_LL y O C a �` O ON Nr a�u'i + G ppV I =tea «Eo a. "O1 p�u �".7 •+u u Q S aa A A a vC pp • uy Y C ��.� V� yiv Y. 4 A 1 wY YnMY1!NN LS p■ i 4 Na61 m Y Z O C NCEZ is o C C y &I S e.^ f Z k�� z- o a L-35 w.�.. M O�� Y c N � ° pact �' E o.i a u "e M= v vCC ° LyO ^ P n o Y � � L n Yy J Q_LL y O C Tu �` O Nr G + G ppV =tea «Eo a. "O1 p�u �".7 •+u a r tom. v 11 --- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY SUBJECT: April 22, 1487 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Bruce Cook, Associate Planner TERRA VISTA NORTHEAST ,QUADRANT AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN - LUU.'a nuiorts - consideration of an area c�ieve opment plan owe the quadrant of the Terra Vista Planned Community for that portion of Terra Vista located south of Base Line Road, north of the central major greenway spine, east of Milliken Avenue, and west of Rochester Avenue I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Accttion Requested: Approval of concept,:-1 area development plan Tor the northeast Community. quadrant of the 'Terra Vista Planned L. Purpose: To establish future land use, numbers of dwelling units, dens }ty transition patterns, and trail alignments for the greenway system, To address this issue of changing market trends, the Community Plan was designed to allow flexibility in land use classifications, either zip or down one density range, without requiring an amendment to the Community Plan. The Planning Commission requested that Lewis Homes prepare area development plans in which large areas were planned on a comprehensive - basis to ensure the proper relationship of " de.nsity transitions. The Planning Commission has previously reviewed and approved area development plans f(,r the northwest quadrant, the southwest quadrant, and the southeast quadrant of the Terra Vista Planned Community (see attacead Exhibit "A "), The northeast quadrant of the Terra Vista Pianned community is the last portion of the Planned Community to be reviewed for consideration by the Planning Commission. III. ANALYSIS: The purpose of this area development plan is to estaBTisfr future land use patterns, maximum number of housing units, density transition patterns, and alignment of the trail system. Though tot patterning, internal street configurations, and access points ire shown with the area develnpment plan, these ITEM M PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Terra vista Area Development Plan April 22, 1987 Page 2 issues are not to be included as Fart of the review for the area deveiopment'pTan. These items will be considered at the time that each of the individual - planning areas: is submitted for subdivision and /or product development. A. Land Use Patterns; Land use patterning as proposed, with the area eve opmen plan is consistent with the land use plan for the Terra Vista'Community Plan (see attached Exhibit "B"). B. Number r „” Dwelling Units: The Terra Vista Corrminity Plan ast-6a Tis e cap of the total numbers of dwelling units, +hat can be deveioped within the Planned Community. Per the density distribUiion plan, Ps originally approved, total residential development in Terra Vista was not to exceed 8,000 dwelling units except in the case of density bonuses for affordable housing for which an extra dwelling unit is allowed for each ,affordable housing unit provided, not to exceed a total of 1,200 dwelling units. However, in Octorer of last year, the Community Plan was amended to rezone the 20 acre junior high school site adjacent to Rc4hester Avenue to Low- Medium Residen -0al ;.Ordinance No. 301 i;hr Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment 86 -01, approved and adopted November 5, 1986). With this additional residential: acreage added to the Planned Community, the new housing limit totals have subsequently been amended to a cap of 8,120 dwelling units with potential density bonus for affordable housing of up to 1,21b dwelling units. Therefore, the maximum number of dwelling units that would be persmitted within the Planned Community would be 9,338 dwelling units. The total number of dwelling units proposed with the area development plan for the northeast quadrant is 1,662 dwelling units.. , The mid -range base density for the northeast quadrant is 1,329 dwelling °units. With the reduction of 1 unit, the proposed housing total would be consistent with the guidelines of the Community Plan perfaitting a variation of up tt► 25% of the total number of dwelling units within any of the four neighborhor,.is within Terra Vista (1,329 times 1.25 = 1,661). Howevt�, when all units are totaled as shown on the proposed Master Plan for the entire Terra Vista Commun y, 77751 dwelling —units are proposed which excee s the maximum X3;338 creiTi"ns unit limit ���ap�fo—r Terra Vista. Additionally,, this maximum limit or 9,,338 dwelling units can only be achieved if the Coasrunity Plan's guidelines for affordable housing are 100% satisfied. Therefore, there will need to be a reduction ofiTie` total units as shown WItn the proposed Terra Vista* Ws ter Man. A -A 11 r] PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Terra Vista Area Development P"an April 22, 1987 to Page 3 C. Density Transitidns: Planning Cow.ssion policy has been that all a acen an uses should provide proper transition of density. Generally, adjacent land uses should be within one density range of each other. In assess ,1,19 the proposed area development plan in comparison to this goal, staff has found the area development plan to, be generally consistent with the standard of adjacent land uses being within one density range of each other, except for that portion of the Plan north of Terra Vista Parkway, and west of Mountain View Drive. In this area, there is a portion where Low Medium lies adjacent to Medium -High; a spread of 2-"density rangrfs. However, any pol,.ntial impac's occurring at the interfa.e of these two land use: can be mitigated through appropriate site planning. Also, a oortion of tide trail system separates these two land uses whi, ;h can act as a buffer. D• k '!1a3ment of Trail System: Figure 1: -23 0 the Terra_.Vi_sta Gymum y an es Is es trail alignments thrda ,pout the Planned Comity. The trail System as proposed 'wit the area development plan for the northeast quadrants of Terra Vista is essentially consistent with the Community Plan Standards. However, staff does have some concerns as to the new troprsed design of the certtal major greenway spine resulting f:-om the elimination of the junior nigh school site adjacent to Rochester Avenue. The greenway spire is designed as a landscaped, linear park running from northeast to southwest throug�i the entire community, and is the backbone of the Terra Vista Community. A primary criteria in the design of the greenway spine was the location of major anchors at each end to promote full use of the greenway and trails. These major anchors are the Town Center Commercial Development at the greenway spine's westerly terminus, and the proposed junior high school site at the greenway spine's eastern terminus. However, with the adoption of Terra Vista. Planned Community Amendment 86-01, there no longer are plans to locate a junior high school site adjacent to Rochester Avenue. With this amendment to the Community "Ian, there is no lor—er a major anchor at the easterly tere=nus of the greenway spine to function as a logical destinatior point to encourage use of the trail system. Staff believes that with the present design there is a major inconsistency with the intended design of the trail system per tine directives of the Community Plan and what is being proposed vit_4 the area development )Ian for the northeast quadrant of ,zrra Vista. Staff would suggest that the Planning Commissio:I #frect Lewis Homes to explore various alternatives as to devalc+ a w.ajor anchor to f-:nction as a logical destination point for the eastern terminus of the greenway spine to be consistent with the directives of the Terra Vista Community Plan. 3 to PLANNING COM4+iISSI1 j STAFF REPORT Terra Vista Area 'de0lopment Plan April 22, 1987 I Page 4 J IV. RECOMNENDA'r,ION• Stki4 recommends that the Planning Commission' e e3' rr �ac�i5n n the area development plan for the rWsr,theast quadrant of tale Terra Vista Planned Cimnity pending 4&quate resolution-to provrriing a major anchor at the easterly terminus for the—greenway spi^.e_ and reduction in the total number of dwelY,ng uni within Terra ,%ta. rj Resp fully sitted, l sra Bul, ar City 'Planner BB:BC:ns Attachments:- Exhibit "A" - Area Development Plan Exhibit 1" - Land Use Plan Exhibit *Cu Density Distribution Plan Exhibit "D" - Trail Plan Exhibit "E" - Community PIan Excerpts a $ fill, !6!� x9�i &i� M�■i CC - •INM �` �imysQaa ' i i "Y is cc a De • CM S , i mill, I� .�Y ` '• e� _ Vol ev ' CC -� 4 51 qe -mil'_ i � .,t - � -•w �/ .. .i .i} L ��" r _.� r rarer j r 1 -Fr _ Va v p z U lo- - ;+tt . p er i ..�... _ I f:,:•. X r'3 V E El aE) A 0 �c m dN i Q •mv U) INNER a N � ? �7J CITY Of. rrrmE RANCHO CUC-mvIQNGA i-7,.L11-Vl`11t ` tV DIVMiM ... ft% -.l i:vwlnrr. "e.-l' l•P'��tC. i '37�Y 3 ! z �l 1A, ,. isav _ VU fax 0U��"'°°g • { _ P Rai J 1'' jai ox Yz al r 3� uCr c, uj IL cm a N i— d C4 +� i Ci di &W LIS I 0 S- Z Qv >>'u'.y ,L UA P uj P CC �.z MME =.� { �tl. t 1>2 a }� . V t7 U I-. s iz- IV Vu_ �•, °4 ?`S�qS COZO uj IC w w � � ': saws••' .�•• °• � , \� , e � ' � ate.. W. � r._�_. f•J�"� � 6`� a (). � � W � � W ve.•a. raw ` •°'° • W \�+�^�•1 r am W�cfsr '_: _' _� i. � — • � � ' .0., C ® 3 u ca r F- _gym m ''F {Y i i•o4�.Y`tL1.. �.��. %1 `_ `'_.r/ _ ✓'_�' � srs•� O,auee :ya..s•s.�wAe�pk. _ .�� �1 -�j O. V _ 2AV MAW � ® x � e r. � . � `'4 i t �'' '• � 1. �.. k z .Y ,�. �. �; g�rc+ a �3�'� Vass 'k'�^r:�� c-.. L� '�,r'_� t.L 5 � .� s .� r •Y.��'. 1 y) a . �! s ♦ }_ � u� � �++�� ,} � ,� � .r �� ' _ .t � �, % _ � �1� ',. Ln+ r t t � � e � r i s1 '. t .,r ` "eot } � . �. l • - '4 ,� C � Y� � �r.x � t C Y$. :- '� f y�e .- r 4. Y'� :ti. .�.._ ® x � e r. � . � `'4 i t �'' '• � 1. �.. k z .Y ,�. �. �; g�rc+ a �3�'� Vass 'k'�^r:�� c-.. L� J 3 .t t M-11 Vd 00 0 0 E. 0 Im LN ili7 ozL4 z a x Q � J {C Q Q Co Lit w i a o o 3 yr e q M-11 Vd 00 0 0 E. 0 Im LN ili7 ozL4 a x ic •e E "y v LU w a3 m AgH a UA c C u. C7 3 0.2 N r•" !O U w N -V ttl C uvi V N N of y, ip ?•C L C� U (m e y L C a.• ro 61 L m w � m L. C L O ,^ ; d. �. V O. U L 'w C •y N E w O C e L m V. d N C L 67 L 0 F- O A 'O 41 u l0 v u u E m c Lae .L m L�a m LL�ooE6m Q1 v �.c- Owe 1 C C O. e. OO NLO —m •� r0 L. .0 V O � t } m �aairL- �•�� m I m p °� m d CJ'E(n m �d S L Co 11m c�c 'ma �� L a�� 0 1 m Z m t� A z iA { o p' o w s a c� u. V o-o = M.!2 -x m 2 >. t-A 75 L i O m 0 C ~ m mmmsm ymC.. $ y U C C O; .0+ Q m ;0 s+ O O �. Im C N C 1 c 7 ti U ma�CO U C. A - >E c l -" o o .. ° co a L tp. e m cc G N O L J O p w y L c •p F- L fo 0 Vf t0 w icp •; cn CS O In C q4 C x C 0 L y °' C d >• O ci V L 'L C) C >, al C 'O C. V 7 .+ O �' ' L C U C d m•O�CptjV H d � U !t- LC.ovEt: amt • ® l- i-toi0 M- I;L T E 1] 1�1 1 A .t n w N A d d t7 G N Y d7 r h E 3 SE ujr� 3� R a �e 9 C7 IIyww �yy V i CACCO �UO6dr«L+N6O1ip Ij p 0 O i...Cc w L L 6) CL000,W 0� 6i u 9 O > A u ~ '- M = �L+aC «a7aLi�r i0 eNp�i'rLE'ou r d C ° ° 61 R7 1- Yf O N 'O CL U «r=o ul ° «+ � 0 L 0 0— L E - rL CL Y1 AO Q =C y L« [ CM`.10W Me �3..>°� C'"eo6s 61 rnd LyO43.�"'.' 7. O X 0.�.` C,= N O CU. aic.. o-0 1 o1�X m BEmcAi d� Zua � V w S C C O W Al 0=414 0 �dm�0n6ui�.. �EE3� o+ ?, °y dc CI C O C y C.w E 6y3m c3° v « = 6 M E 6 to E ° > 4� fJ a ~ m Cc mo 'aro�> t0 A d E �..� 0 6CO7 Q1 a$�oAiOpC1C C u 'm I— auE�L.u°7licoc. M' 1.3 71, 'O c AS to CD G 0 0 L Q1 m .L: H u m Q. yr C 61 CL 0 c m Y L m u 'a CL • N 4 'o c m 3 c Qf 61 L dt r u+ W > y L O L U 0 t- c 61 61 0 O L 7 O O 'O Li stern . c m i 3 w O L B1 u Im 3 E A d - N rnca 61 r yEt° 31 tit C� u� MI 0 CL «, 0 N ro c �C 0 E ' 'y" V• NQ C— C Cs� y > N d > V 3 > . -o — >d ° a7. L L = q 7 tn N �p C_ 3 e 5: $J � d v ►i a, o tift Vol �jq Q. C .p O rp tA � y Z) tA y N vi L Q L U m CL .— N A' N C L N— w H .0— u 'q m o r a u c�L ?yCd CEt��ro ��.. E m o E. u -, — r 'n O 0 y U V N E L NS ®A Cy- C aul� +" ' •� a '- U vl3 wl WdR.+ -> u��uroaC7` C tci a) d -.2 L L C M y CC y a3o�a�� y�sr Asti 0 � 0 11 CITY OF RANCHO CLTCAMONrA DATE. April 22, 1987 TO: Chairmar,'and Members of the Planning Comm ssinn FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Warren, f ',ociate- Planner c�cn�ro 0 + l � 1 F N,) 15 U1 > 1977 SUBJECT, INDUSTRIAL SPECIFY PLAN AMENDMENTS - SUBAREA 8 - Review of existing buoarea a lana use and dev-ero-p-m-en-f-standards requested by the City Council I. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: In September of 1986: the City Council adopted ex en . amen ens to the industrial Specific Plan (ISP), as recommended by'-the Planning Commission. During Council review, concern was voiced over the expansion of Subarea 8 (General Industrial) into portion of Subarea 9 (Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial) adjacent to the 1-15 Freeway. The concerns related to a perce�vea loss of employment potential due to the .cnange and rx 'sultant limitations on heavy industrial use. The City Council did not wish to Pold up the process and approved the ISP amendments as recommended by the Planning Commission. However, it was requested that Subarea 8 adjacent to the I -15 Freeway be reviewed with these concerns in mind. The City Council also desired what the issue be '.irought before the Chamber of Commerce for their analysis n' input. During the first ,p,!rt of this year, the Chamber's Economic Development Committee considered tze recently ads- tad 'and use amendments and found them to be appropi iate. In s review, the, Committee wished to ensure that storage and warehousing continue to be allowed in this area at least as an interim use (the current Provisions do authorize warehousing in the subarea). Further, rye Committee recommended that a "Line of sight analysis should be required for each use located adjacent to ti-is freeway, to be conducted from the western most travel lane of the freeway ". This policy could hopefully ensure that any Storage/ w- ehousing nperatior:, is appropriately screened from the public view Staff concu , with the views of the Chamber in support of the ex s i nr prove sl ^ns as recently adopted. p . `T�e`r � so agree wi th the "'"II or s g provision as suggested. The attached standards are L Planning CommissionlCity Council approved development provisions for all o` Subarea B.._ The Chamber of Commerce found the sh fta �ye acceptabIC as written with the additid,� of line -of- si g s u requ� amen ,s. ITEM N PLANNING COWISSIC,Y STAFF REPORT INGUSrRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMFRDME..rS SUBAREA 6 April 22, 1967 Page 2 II. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Canmmissior confirm i s, previous position and determine that the existing ISP provisions for Subarea 6 are appropriate. Further, it is recomnended1hat the Planning Commission authorize staff `to request "line of sight" s"udies from the freeway as suggested by the Chamber for I developments adjacent Lto the I-15 Freeway, This ., can be a chatter of Commission policy, and no- amendment , "c'o the ISP is required at this time. Res tfuliv s fitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:AW:te e Attachments: Subarea S Development Standards Letter From Economic Development Ccxamittee J E AO a O � P � dV IV -53 I Ali G' l�l V J x JAIN o s 3 � S J "i {Existing s4an�±8 pia ve+aeM^.v'y amehftd by Manning 0bro lseloni SUBAREA 8 `\ Land Use Designation General Indosiria` ` Primary Function This area functions t(,, pr'ovida for General Industrl71 ti es dnd to apure for o transUion area fr& rieavy Industrial,. }category located north of this tubarea— North of Arrow „and west 'of Milliken, the industii'rl us%, should be allowed to :continue c id expand 0th all service according to the devel.opM*rt , standards of the plan.- Subarea 8 ektends nc#& of Arrow approximately 1004` east of Cieveland to the east Plan boundary including a' portion south of; {grow along the eas *.erp'plan, boundary. Permitted Uses Custom Ma,P4facturing ,.- Light Manufacturing E` Research Pubtic Storage Light Wholesale, Storage, and DiAribiition , iridium Wholesale, Stordge.ar, Distribution Agricultural /Nursery 5upp Tvs .-d Services Automotiver'Lf,ght truck Repair- kinor : 1lutomoti ve /Teuck Repai r- Major_--, Building Contractor 's Offices tired, Y:aris Buil drg mia ntenanLe.Services C i Building Sepplies, and Light EquipmeAt Sales Business Supply RzZail Sa ?es and Services F,usiness Support`Services Communication Services, Eating and Drinking Establish+nents Laundry Services Recreation Facilities Repair Services A.6ministrative Civic Services .F-mod- Control /jltility corridor Conditional Uses l Med'i q Menufacturing Administrative and Office -; Professoaal /Resign Services Animal Care Autototive Fleet Storage Automotive Rental /Leasing Automotive Service Station Convenience Sales and Ser,!ices Entertainment Fast Food Sat�►s Financial, Insurance and Rea? Estate: Services Food and Eeverage Sales Heavy Equipment Sales and Rentals riedi cal /Health Care Services Personal. Services IV -5h SUBAREA 8 (Continued) Petroleum Products 5torage .--,Public Assembly Public Safety and Utility Services Relig'7ous Assembly Access and Circulation 120' Right-Of-Way -.D6y Creel, Boulevard Milliken - a-i U 100' Right-Of-Way - Arrow (No median on Arrow) Etiwanda Rochester 64 ft an ft. 88' Right-Of-Way - Jersey ` SUBAREA 8 (Con2fnued)j, F 66' Right-Of-Way -All other Ldcal Streets 4 a 0a f Aitow :7 Minimum Parcel Size One -Half (1/2) acre fatoack Requirements Average (Measured from u ?ti- ;' Landsca,,i`ns- Parking 8ulAding mate face nR curb) De�rr Creek Blvd. 45" i5' 4�4 ' Milfliken 45' 25" 45ti Arrow 4! 25' 4S' Rochester 4b'' 25' 45' Etiwdada 45' 25' 45' °cy 35' 20' 35' AIT tither Local 25' 15' 25' r iT'fP.tS Landscaping Requtremj�rts` 12% of net lot area Perforsiiance Standards Noix : The maximum allowable noise lever of any use s -7T not exceed 75 tdn as weasured at the ;lad. 11jne of the lot containing the use. Where a use occ �' a lot abutting residentially Maned laud, the naise level shall not etceed 65 Ldn as measired at the common lut line. Noise caused by raotor" vehicles and trains are exempted from this standard. Vibration: All uses shall be operated so as got to generate vibeation discernible without 5nstrua.�ents by the average persons beyond the lot upon which tFie source is located. Vibration caused motor. vehicles, trains, and temporary - construction or demoNtion. is exempted from this standard. ANIL N� SUBAREA 8 (Continued) Petroleum F,�oducts Storage Rubiic Assembly ._Public Safe'y and Kility Services Religii4s Assembly Access and Circulation 120' Right -Of -Way -..nay Creek 3oulevard ',:Milliken s AOL 100' Right -Of -Way - Arrow (No median on Arrow) £tiwanda Rochester 88' Right -Of -flay - Jersey 6F�, IV -y5 k _ SUBAREA 8 (Continued) Particulate Matter and Air Contaminants: In addition Y compliance wft he A f� scan standards, all sJses shall operated so as not to emit particulate matter or`air contaminants which are readily detectable without instruments by the average person beyond any lot line of the lot containing such uses. v�or: All uses shall be op rated so as not to emit' Daher which causing unpleasant odors b're perceptible tb the average person beyond any lot line of the lot gntaining such uses. Humidity, Heat -and Glare, All uses shall be operated so as nor to produce ce l`umidity, heat, glare or high - intensity illumination which is perceptible without instruments by the average person beyond the lot line of any lot containing such uses. Specil Consideration Due to tee potential conflicts ;Between uses within this _ subarea and the uses within the Industrial Park 'of Category adjacent Subarea 6 & 7, built'Tng setback from abutting property fur Medium Manufacturing and greater intensity shall be no less than 45. Class C Performance Standards of the adjoining Minimum ImpactlHeavy industrial area (Subarea 9), allow existing businesses and future 'Industrial uses which Produce noise, particulate matter and air contaminants, vibration, odor, humidity, heat, glare or high intensity. Uses sensitiv --D these conditions, such as precision manufacturing .r office projects, should consider these .factors prior to location in the vicinity of Minimum Impact /Heavy Industrial propei- -rty. Both the potential park site location and fire station location are shown to indicate approximate location. Development within 600' of the 1 -15 Freeway shall have outdoor storage areas completely screened from view along the freeway. Because of the existing rail service, users with rail service needs are permitted within the area west of Milliken Avenue. i5iRZUIRAW_W' To preserve and enhance the image of ire commgpity soacial considerations shall be given to the quality of site design, architecture, and landscaping of all - properties adjacent to the I -15 Freeway. Attractive screening of outdoor work, loading; storage areas, roof and ground mounted equipment from significant freeway prints of view shall be required.' IV -57 , x� CAM 42 ilancho, opt x 73M CARNELIAN STREET, SUITE 130 Feb4-14ary 23, 19-87 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 TI lLEP IONE: 714/987.1012 n City of Rancho Cucamonga Attn: Brad Buller, cifi;t Planner 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA _91730 7 >- Subject: ISP amendments - Sub -area #8 11 Dear Brad:: r' The Economic Development Committee aas new reviewed the draft amendments furnished by your pffi.cie several times, azd finds concurrence F:ith the amendments as.currently proposed. At the January meeting of the EDC, discussion centered around what types of screening techniques she ld'be required , for new uses located adjacent to the Devore Freeway. The EDC feels that those future uses should be adeq�;ately screened from view, inasmuch as this corridor is an important viaual Entryway to Rancho Cucamonga. The EDC feels,,- hat a visual line -of -tight analysis should be required for "each use located adjacent to this freeway, to be conducted from the western -most travel lane of the freeway. Pertaining to permitted uses, the EDC feels that, while storage uses along with warehousing may not be the ultimate empinyee-- intensive kid of land use to be realized, this area- may see interim development: of uses like thesep at least until such time as the regional shopping center-and other developments of that character become reality. The EDC supports '.he amendments as presented, and will be available at future public hearings before the :Manning Commission and City Council to sc recommend. Thar'r you and your staff for your assistance in our review of this p, :oject Truly yours, RANC110 CUCP,140NGA CHAMBER Comm =E c } Aar tchell Chairma a Eco c Development Committee 4c: 5ob Dl,tt:ton I U7. 11 CITY OF RANCHO WCAMONNGA. STAFF REPORT DATE: April 22, 1987 70- Chairman and Memb6f?; of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad ,."=tiler, VYi.hanner BY: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner SUBJECT: COMMUNITY PARKWAY TRAIL ON BERYL I. BACKGROUND: The attached let-ter from Mr. Lyndon Harp has been fc_r_v_ar_de_T,10 the'PlaPk1ing Commission for review. The letter has also been forwardod to. the Trail's Advisory Committee and the Park Devel oPm( -it Commission. Specifically, Mr. Harp Is requ^stiag that the City review and consider prohibiting horse riding along Beryl St.-eet north of Hillside. 11. AWV'%S: Mr. Harp is the property owner at 9110 Carrari Court at We-66*ellieast corner of Beryl Street and Ca"ari Court. Mr., Harp was contacted by Ccamnity Cide R� ?presentatives and Maintendnce Workers prior to iJs recent letti;r '�regardinq rocks, plants and irrigLtioi equipment installed within the Beryl parkway that crea;led a safety hatzard for horse riders using the Crmunity Parkway Trail on Beryl as referenced in his letter on page 2. The parkway on the east side of Seryl Street has been in use ar un equestrian trail since the tracts north of Hillside were built prior to incorporation. This parkway trail was designated as a Community Tray' with the adoption of City's General Plan Master Plan of Trails (Figure 111-7 of the General Plan). The Community Trail along Beryl has historically been one of ?!he busier trail riding routes because it provides convenient access to the Almond Cowunity Trail and the Regional Trail along Demens Channel. , The Camunity TriAls provide the user with access to the Regional Multi-Purpose Trails and to community facilities such at Heritage Park located at the southwest corner of Beryl Street and Hillside Avenue. These Community Trails form loops of varying length and act as the 4aiti4" link of unifying the existing disjointed Local Feeler Tra 'I System. The goal of thn General Plan is t,).provide an interconnected system of riding, bicycling and hiking trails which 0 have safe access an! travel to the neighborhood, city and Pegioaal parks; recreation facilities, scenic areas, reFid'Pcp+ al, commercial and industrial areas. .11 IT01 0 PLANNUG COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Comnwnity Parkway Trail on Beryl April 22, 1987 Page 2 Concern fl: The landsczjAnn and hardscape installed by the Aunty Corp of Engineers at the interse<tion, of Demens Channel and Hillside obstructs access to the regional .trail along the channel right -of -way. Staff Comment: Staff raised this concern during a courtesy review of the landscape and irrigation plans, for ti;a beautification of flood control channels throughout the community. Unfortunately, the Army Corp of Engineers and the County of San Bernardino declined to modify the improvement plans to provide convenient trail access at these intersection locations: The City Maintenance Division has scheduled the retrofit construction of trail connections at this intersection. Presently, trail accesi. is provided in existing local feeder trails on both sides of the chann(II that lead up to the debris basin. Cwmr . #2 - Closure of Beryl Coumnity Parkes Trail.: Essentially, Mr. Harp is' requesting that the Master Plan of trails be amended to delete the ContAnity Trail on Beryl. Mr. Harp lists several problems associated with horse ridars on Beryl Street, including traffic safety, and maintenance. Staff Coment: Staff would recommend the following actions be taken to address Mr. Harp's concerns: 1. Alta Loma Riding Club should continue to educate its members on trail safety issues and in particular, of the need to ride along off street Parkway trails as opposed to riding en the street payemtnt itself. 2.- The Sheriff's Department should routinely patrol Beryl Street to insure that riders art obeying tie laws concerning traffic safety, 3. Consideration sh:)uld be giver for funding the installation of a Community Parkway Trail fence between the trail and the street and to provide 6-signated trail crossings on Beryl Street. Concern requests that the General Plan Plan Ma r Community Trail Trails be amendedato delete the Community Trail on Beryl. Staff CWWnt: As previously mentioned, the Community Trail • on Beryl is a vital linkage between the Almond Community Trail, Heritage Park and the Regional Trail along Demens Channel, Elimination or this trail would be contrary t� the goals and v PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Coacnunity Parkway Trail on Beryl 1 April 22, 147 Page 3 objectives of the General Alan tq establIsh an interconnected sy,tem of riding, bicycling and hiking trails which have safe access and travel to neighborhood, city and regional parks, recreation facilities and scenic areas. Mr., Harp's regdest raises policy questions which go beyond the scope df Beryl Street itseU Concern ig - Trail Signage: Mr. Harp requests that a "big si3n you can read ",�be 61spiayed and point the way along the Demens Channel Trail to i4icate that Beryl is not a horse trail. ti St4?f Co t :. Again, Beryl Street is designated as a Community Parkway Trail. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has Installed permamit trail sigds that indicate the trail system at the 1 intersection of Demens Channel Regional �� Trail with Beryl and Hillside. concern fS Trail' Maintenance: Mr. Harp expresses c�ncerp with the - xpenditure of City funds for the maintenance of the Community Trail on Beryl in relation to the ratio of horse owners near Beryl to the community at large, Staff Comment: The imprw,ements installed by Mr. Harp within the public right-of-way creatsd an truction and unsafe riding surface which required -clean up oy City maintenance crews. The Community Trail along Beryl is not limited to equestrian use only and is intended to function as a hiking trail as well. Therefore, the maintenance of the trail provides a comaaunity wide benefit and is not exclusive to equestrian users. Resp /e ifuTly submitted, �a Bra 3 ler City iii anner BB:GC:vc Attac`aments: Letter from Lyndon Harp Figure II1 -7 - Master Plan of Trails MARCH 16 1 987 City of Rancho Cucamonga P a ban 807, Aancno Cucamonga Ca ?1? o Attention: Mayor Dennis Stout Mr H.z yor s Lyndon Harc `=1' s Carrara L*_ al s Loma Ca ?T7� }i t is time to get the horsemen off of north Beryl 5t. There as the designated horse trail along the drainage canal which cro3ses Beryl and hillside. Alongside this trail to the Bast of Beryl and continuing north along the Seviers Homes Tract is another designated horse trail. This trail was ofanned into tae tract when it wcz dcvelaped. There is Fsne prof eel with the drainage canal trail . It has been bloc.�ed riff at Beryl and the plantings have limited the access to it and the tract bridle trail. Some thought and modifications should be given to this area. Whv can't a big sign you can read be prominently displayed and point the way along this trail. and up the canyons letting it be known Beryl is "01;; the horse raute7 Psht now, with the new park Opening up is a good time to direct _these horse poop]* to the east along the drainage canal horse trail and up the canyon to the wilderness area-. It is the same area they and up in when they go up Beryl. The horse club should be notified of the route and told to use it for their group outings. Many of the horsemen ride several abreast disregarding the fast moving traffic an Beryl. This traffic is going to increase with the addita,n or the cars frgm the new tract which is being built at thc- extreme north end of Beryl. It is not unusual for the horsemen to congregate in groups and the cars have to come to a complete stop in ar,der to not hit and injure the horses and the riders. 1 had an occassion recently when a rearing out of control horse almost ran into my car after I had come to a complete stop. I have oeen told of incidents when horses have been hit since i have lived in the area. F have seen riders dumped in the street in traffic. These aets adults we are tal k ir•; about. o-4- +I HARP L13�m Ii" The City recently saent man)/ mart hatrr3 remavin wit?t hand rakes from tl eas,t = 9 s4all rocks I horseman eomolalned vacut. � side of E+ervi decaus� a ride ,over, t• i- being too hard for nis horse to tie.. +� =jsn t it a the whole point cf riding is to rough ark,; get b�C &'_.Lo nature" Show riding 3A. done in thLa ring, The =itv should not sP„tnd so much mwneY (atern9 to this srauo of orool e . In ,.Yy area le than 1�; % of the people halve horses. This` was arrzve6 at by a quLO; purvey of t.JJp nearby areas. i have been toil that when the old riding club way active ;ii before the park wam developed: it had less than %)% members from the local area., Whv should lr,!! n9a cater so much to out of L-�wn Come from many mi es awgy because of the . peoAiet who good treatment here? 5ipod facilities and The city does not derive any money from the Activltes of this group and it puts a tat of horsas on the streeta when Viev have an organizod ride up Beryl is the wilderness area. lip This route alp, *1g Sary1 -was no doubt ai 9,, ad rct''t.1 back a few fears ago. Since there hav bean several -further to the wilderness area now. new tracts deve'oped in the area they congestion has increased, and it is a ]art I like well kept and nice looking horse . I Srew uo�th them and have worked a lot with them. Now I Sre" moved off of the farm and I don't want them in my ^t'Jnt void;; crapping there ware 14 Piles of on my lawn and in the streets. gfter one scent group ride Beryl. home crap within two blocks an I don't like the 'SO called' housemen of Cur .amarga because a great right., of them IrG very inconsiderate a, n seem to think their right, overr$do all others in 4;he area. Recently I had an s +rss vc �ida±r knock Me down in my own front ya ^d with his 'torser� 1-et "s fEf THE, HORSES OFF BERYL AND INTO THE Wlt,DEANESS AREA paw, I HAVE HAD IT WITH THE HORSEMEN AND T`lEIR A T 1TUDE. Sinc. Orel Y your inure 111-7 MASTER PLAN . . . .................. OF TRAILS TRAIL SYSTEM, — EXISTING COMMUNITY )0000 PROPOSED c-ommuNrry tulwi—REGIONAL, MULTI-SvSTEM PARKS PROPOSED PARKS EXIS-nNG MARKS SCHOOLS' EXISnh'.G SCHOOLS PROPOSED SCHOOLS CIVIC/COMMUNITY CENTER PROPOSED RFCRW TION AREA = EOUESTRIAN/RURAI. AREA CITY OF RANCHO rNI)GAVION" GENERAL PLAN 01.09 0 --vml AOOO* 11 11 w 2 CITY OF 1t4NCHG �;JCAMCNGA G ,AAIQ ST"F REPORT DATE; April 22, 19871 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Da% Coleman, Senior Planner SUBJECT: BILLBOARD AMORTIZATION �. BACKGROUND: In 1979, t5e City Council adopted a comprett^,��,yiign r TR-nce w ich required the amortization of advertising ,,ruptures (herein after referred to as billboards). Staff has completed a surveu of existing on- premise and off- premise billboard signs within the Citj of Rancho Cucamonga (see attached). There are a total of 30 biiiborrds within the City, 25 of which are located on Foothill Boulevard, Ir, addition, the City Attorn% w has reviewed the enforci'oility of the City's Sign Ordinaml.) regulations regarding billboards. The attacbad letter from the City P.ttorney concludes that the majol^ity of--the Sign Ordinance rF;gulations are inconsistent with the requirements:, of state law in their application to off - premise billboards (t-'Ae except;ion being the removal of billboards in agrAcaltural and rF•.sidentia'1 zones). The result of state law is that all off - premise bil')boards oast be treated in t1v2 some mariner as with the acquisition of real. property. Ther @fore, the City of Rancho Cucamonga would be required to go through condemnation pro.;eeding� to remove billboards whicr is a costly and time - consuming process. A:' of this report, we `still do not have any c:�st Estimates. We are working with Cal Trans who i�, the respoc-Able ._ :,cy for preparing a valuation schedule for billboards. Staff will attempt to have this information for the April 22 meetings - II. RECL4VENDATION: Staff is requesting a recoi;!endation from the Planning Cc, ion to the City Council whether or not to proceed with a condemnation program for billboard removal as part of the Fiscal 1987 -88 budget and work program. R ctfully matted, 4 Br'2ty Dut,1�e City .1 nner BB :DC:te Attachments: Letter from City Attorney Exhibit . "A" - Locatiun Map Exhibit "B" - List of B "llboards ITEM P V., Dan Coleman Senirrr Planner Cit!j of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 -0807 Dear Dan; NUMBER ONZ CIVIC CENTER CIRCLE FOURTH FLOOR P.O. sox 1059. BREA. CALIFOPNIA S 62Z -TOSS '- +(7151996 -0901 TELEPHONE I{.131 591 -3811 August 6, 19868 Re: Amortization and Al atement_ of Signs The x,urpose of this letter is to respond to your request frr an opinion concerning the ability of a municipality -,:o amortize and aba±-e (without compensation) nonconforming signs and billboards. Additionally, pursvant to your request, this letter will relate this .jn!',ysis to the ex-isting nonconform- ing sign provisions of the Ranh -. Cucamonga Municipal Code (Charter 14.28). As you know, the recent c -se of Metromedia, Inc. v. C ty of San Diego (1980) 26 C. 311 848, upheld local regulations which abate nonconforming bi�lboards after a reasonable period of amortization. By terms of that :;cling, the current provi- sions of the Municipal Code for.>abatement of nonconforminq signs would be la�4ely acceptable. howevert in rerpons ;v to that case, stn, a iw has been amended to preempt tY:.e authority of that ru'..s: and mandate a uniform sign abatement:. system upon all cities Ord counties. Tha State Outdoor, Advertisinc Act (California Business and Professions Code Sections 5200 et seq.) now contol:ns >estrictions oT. the removal of both -i -and off- premises Ldvertisi"g displays. 1. Off - premise Billboards and Advertieirl StrL.4ctures9 Section 5412 Nf ibe Califarnia:Busiresi and Professions _ Code (a copy {i€ which i. atttached with this le,:ter) provides that :!^ l M �A -E —RECEIVED—o'. JAMES L. MARKMAN CITY OF PANCM CUCAFAOHGA. ANDREW V. ARCZYNSKI PLANNING.. 1XVISION RALPH D. HANSON O.CRAIG FOX AUG COQ G 71986 MA9THA JO GEISLER ,4 AM- PU Dan Coleman Senirrr Planner Cit!j of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 -0807 Dear Dan; NUMBER ONZ CIVIC CENTER CIRCLE FOURTH FLOOR P.O. sox 1059. BREA. CALIFOPNIA S 62Z -TOSS '- +(7151996 -0901 TELEPHONE I{.131 591 -3811 August 6, 19868 Re: Amortization and Al atement_ of Signs The x,urpose of this letter is to respond to your request frr an opinion concerning the ability of a municipality -,:o amortize and aba±-e (without compensation) nonconforming signs and billboards. Additionally, pursvant to your request, this letter will relate this .jn!',ysis to the ex-isting nonconform- ing sign provisions of the Ranh -. Cucamonga Municipal Code (Charter 14.28). As you know, the recent c -se of Metromedia, Inc. v. C ty of San Diego (1980) 26 C. 311 848, upheld local regulations which abate nonconforming bi�lboards after a reasonable period of amortization. By terms of that :;cling, the current provi- sions of the Municipal Code for.>abatement of nonconforminq signs would be la�4ely acceptable. howevert in rerpons ;v to that case, stn, a iw has been amended to preempt tY:.e authority of that ru'..s: and mandate a uniform sign abatement:. system upon all cities Ord counties. Tha State Outdoor, Advertisinc Act (California Business and Professions Code Sections 5200 et seq.) now contol:ns >estrictions oT. the removal of both -i -and off- premises Ldvertisi"g displays. 1. Off - premise Billboards and Advertieirl StrL.4ctures9 Section 5412 Nf ibe Califarnia:Busiresi and Professions _ Code (a copy {i€ which i. atttached with this le,:ter) provides that :!^ l M �A -E 0701 -02 4- 22-K87 PC Agenda. � 4 Page Two " . . no advertising display wnicn was lawfully erected anywhere within this state shall be compelled to be removed, nor shall its customary maintenance or use be limited, whether or not the removal or limitation is pursuant to or because of this chapter or any other law, ordinFnce, or regula- tion of any governmental entity, without payment of compensation, as defined in the Eminent Domain Law [citation] This provision applies regardless of whether a Pre-existing local Ordinance has established a nonconformity for an existing sign. Accordingly, this section will preempt all local regulations dealing with the abatement of nonconforming off - premise bill- boards which do not comply with the requirement for payment of compensations. rs such, Section 14.28.430 of the Development Code (as it applies to )ff- premises advertising displays) is no longer valid in its attempt to impose an amortization schedule, Sections 5412.1 and 5412.2 (copiea attached to Letter) are exceptions to the above - referenced regulations in that said sections allow the abatement and removal of nonconformity advertis- ing_ displays located on residential or agricultural zoned prope -.•.ty, without compensation, when amortized pursuant to the schedule rrov ded .n these sections. it noted that the schedule a?rd provisions of these two sections atc identical to that cilrrently provided in Sect-io;k 14.28.054 of the Rancho Cucamonga M nicipal 0:6e (added, 3982) .end, accordingly, such section-is in compliance with the provisions of state law. in addition to the above - -referenced provisions concern- ing the amortization of advertising displays, the recent addition of Section 5412.6 (copy attached) should be noted. LY that section, any condition of a discretionary approval which: requires the noncompensated removal of a billboard in conjunction with the project will be considered: a compelled removal requiring compen- sation under Section 5412, unless the permit, license, or approval is requested for the construction of a budding or a structure which cannot be built without physically removing the display." P -s Dan Coleman August '6' Pa-e Three Accordingly, this section would impact the validity of Section 14.28.020 D and C (no new sign or site expansion without removal of nonconforming signs) in the event that such prcvi- sions are applied to an oft-premise advertising display. 2. on-premisesAdvertising. Following the addition of the-_,,,Fbove-referenced amend- ments concerning off-premise displays, a"Ilew chapter 2.5 was added to the California Business and Professions Code dealing with the removal of nonconforming on-premise signs (a copy is < attached wi:Lh this letter, commencing at Section 5490). Pursuant to Section 5491, and similar.to those regulations dealing with off�xemise billboards,,on-premise advertising displays could not '�Je abated %�,thout p6�7,nent of compensation. Howet,7erf these provisions are n�t as strict as those pertaining to off-premise advertising and sl��uld not require any substantive amendment of thr:� Municipal Code�� Pursuant to Sect-;')n 5494, an t�rdinance ado pted prior to March 12, 1983 V.�,o�viding'for the noncompensated removal of such norconforming signs will not be suscep4-,ible to the provi- sions of Section 5491 trequiring compensation). Since the majority of Chapter 14.2S N#a,,% adopted in 1979, the provisitns and amortization schedules for removal of signs (as they apply to 2n:pEemise signs) should not be affected by this chapter. Moreover,,pursuant to Sections 5494 and 5495.5 the City may amend Chapter 14.2V-4and retain its privilege for an ordinance, adopted prior to March 12, 1983) as long as the amendments tb t!ie ordinance do not provide a more restrictive amortizatiOn period than set forth in the preexisting ordinance. unlike the provisions for off-premi-Ee advertising, Section 5497 allows the uncompensated removal of on-premise signs on certain criteria (abandonment, partial destruction, condition of expansion, voluntary agreements and public safety). Accordingly, the provisions of Section 14.28.020 are valid as they apply to on-premise signs. P4 Dan Coleman .,.AuVst 6, 1986 Page Four 3. Conclusions and Recommendations. Based upon the foregoing,,.;Lt is obvious that, the majority of Chapter 14.28 is inconsi!��ant with the requirements of rtate law in its application to off-premise billboards (the exception being 14.28.060 - :-emoval in agricultural and residen- tial zones). The result of state law is that all �_-Zf'-premiset billboards must be treated in �he same manrlez�as with, ' the acV.i- sition of real property (i.e.# condemnation). However., the remainder of Chapter 14.28 is appropria�e when applied )nly to on-site advertising. This being the case, no amendmentto Chaptcer 14,28 is absolutely necessary so long as the staff is congnizant of the limitations expressed in this letter %hen applying these provisions to nonconforming signs. if, however, an amendment to Chap,,e�' 4 28 is deemed desirable for the purpose of clarity, it is i�bvi�6us from this letter that the chapter needs to sperifically differentiate the treatment of off- and on-premise advertising displays. As mentioned, such an amendment would be permitted under state law so long as the amortization schedule of Section 14.29.030 remains in the amended provisions. Finally, if the staff should wish to invest!7ate the possibility of selected condemnation of billboards, it. i�;' re�iommended that the City obtain a schedule of valuation available from the California Department of Transportation. Pursuant to Section SA13 (copy attached) state law requires that the Department of Transportation prepare a valuation sc?!�dl�le for billboards to facilitate negotiations on the purchase ana removal of such advertising displays. If you have any questions or comments with regard to any of the matters contained in this letter, or should you desire this office to prepare a draft amendment to Chapter 14.28, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at your earliest convenience. RDH.- lj 1 Encl. cc: Brad Buller, City Planner - Encl. Very truly yours, Ralplf D. Hanson Depnty City Attorney City of Rancho Cucamonga It It I - I It It u H It ua11 i ua it IS u It 11 R H n 1 2:114 11 Ict- +UVVOu0 0UUwUQ Ix.1 t7 '7 9 ¢�tit� \Ll NQ ��t�il tn ,t NH tl Wwcnww us Nw u a t! R It 71 R n 11 n 11 It u it {itY'IY� Q NOONLRtn NN u it DOO ¢O 10 HQct[awH HH ' uu Z u F. E. EH H aHH.W7Wa u a u It OOa QO O j �np�'x r xw.xazu tO Ui l It 6QEH+ OQ d 1 EH' wwwwww mwxl It u N �fNNW,Ixta N3WIVi�t7NiNIVwNNNHZTYY- �HHNHF+t.J{{ tAY it it 3�zSTl 3W¢ 33d:l1�Lt23304C00a06�D,W�DMOOT1 �-- r ll it aG Y.xxtS00 xx Tt xt9xx .�,x aaxwt.�. U:w i,.wsY+. st.wcJi 5 a 11 O d¢¢dd W H,t it TH AAAaA E+ It a wta 0 (ncom �+ �¢¢¢¢ W "u n » �xxxxt+t is 33333 SH n It t30 dUUUUx W (�Ml -tHHH �UiA 9c I It X =dd¢dtK U aGE+eHHH piQd �c a a 00 tx iCtYtYQW JWWtt:St:WLy-In X 14 �t it it T22 WHHHf� Et�i.A7.i�c�t7TrHHt¢LCIQOCOwWJ' Q n t¢¢d w O0i4 . tf1T¢d3ZWWWH`+ \ \ \ \HT \ \' CR u Z i WnQ n,.7aaWw02S�tYtY atE�: »Cd1% 33 MQ334 = u H n LOW Z`e+'+AGt�JtYtYfl",i£wQiT1 �►4�t�t)UH3Q1 -1 •x2x.Tx;t�.lx -�a U n U u ¢d¢,�,7iQ0t\I000IAXWOC ST? 0 u D 11 UU[3.araWS\il3'3[\ti stt \3HHH+1fir,.+rt.a.t 3 rt.•t u a it 10 .a Tt 10-010 u A wlwwwww.. aCV CV iLtA ww�ww www �' aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.�a aaaaaaa.saa i9n , t,. iaa. aaa .iaaa- �a¢aaaata;a�a.�a- i.�a1.4H .Q Z n n HN H HH.H H1- IHHM.i'�H MHH tTjHHYtHHHHt - t H.'. V-6 N I-q !nt a EEFT+EEE[�- �E�+t=+ EFL-+ THT[- �EEEt�iiwf�tl "..•'�ZaHi=+EL=�EEEE tV H u n Q00OC10001000IIE»f30i'F� ?�t%410�1OQQOQO ;: a sat.w s°t. uQ.wwwNQ+w s°,. a°.w¢wwae iSZ ¢w c°4 w CO a) SL. w°w LQ N Ru u \ \ \ N. WLWttSUtiW iAfAtN\t�1N33�N3333� \N WNt\t�t\A :-CH tt iii wzzwwwwmzG1Z ww=Z=w=m=mwm v^ rt -4 M n ,it N . t-t "£ii L° 0 04N 0 rI 0 SF of O N ei t'.t E*i to .rt ::� r. r? rat ct ,-t r, rt .-t ftl rj iXi %i ;'�a' t'w :'1:: £• 1 1 ! i t 1 i k" o, iv t In c4pt1 NCO0.0, -' vO qn' N C.7 C9 t.,,-tLNtvf+iNC (4N INrC- 1 Aga I 1 It It I - I It It u H It ua11 i ua it IS u It 11 R H n 1 2:114 11 Ict- +UVVOu0 0UUwUQ Ix.1 t7 '7 9 ¢�tit� \Ll NQ ��t�il tn ,t NH tl Wwcnww us Nw u a t! R It 71 R n 11 n 11 It u it {itY'IY� Q NOONLRtn NN u it DOO ¢O 10 HQct[awH HH ' uu Z u F. E. EH H aHH.W7Wa u a u It OOa QO O j �np�'x r xw.xazu tO Ui l It 6QEH+ OQ d 1 EH' wwwwww mwxl It u N �fNNW,Ixta N3WIVi�t7NiNIVwNNNHZTYY- �HHNHF+t.J{{ tAY it it 3�zSTl 3W¢ 33d:l1�Lt23304C00a06�D,W�DMOOT1 �-- r ll it aG Y.xxtS00 xx Tt xt9xx .�,x aaxwt.�. U:w i,.wsY+. st.wcJi 5 a 11 O d¢¢dd W H,t it TH AAAaA E+ It a wta 0 (ncom �+ �¢¢¢¢ W "u n » �xxxxt+t is 33333 SH n It t30 dUUUUx W (�Ml -tHHH �UiA 9c I It X =dd¢dtK U aGE+eHHH piQd �c a a 00 tx iCtYtYQW JWWtt:St:WLy-In X 14 �t it it T22 WHHHf� Et�i.A7.i�c�t7TrHHt¢LCIQOCOwWJ' Q n t¢¢d w O0i4 . tf1T¢d3ZWWWH`+ \ \ \ \HT \ \' CR u Z i WnQ n,.7aaWw02S�tYtY atE�: »Cd1% 33 MQ334 = u H n LOW Z`e+'+AGt�JtYtYfl",i£wQiT1 �►4�t�t)UH3Q1 -1 •x2x.Tx;t�.lx -�a U n U u ¢d¢,�,7iQ0t\I000IAXWOC ST? 0 u D 11 UU[3.araWS\il3'3[\ti stt \3HHH+1fir,.+rt.a.t 3 rt.•t u a it 10 .a Tt 10-010 u A wlwwwww.. aCV CV iLtA ww�ww www �' aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.�a aaaaaaa.saa i9n , t,. iaa. aaa .iaaa- �a¢aaaata;a�a.�a- i.�a1.4H .Q Z n n HN H HH.H H1- IHHM.i'�H MHH tTjHHYtHHHHt - t H.'. V-6 N I-q !nt a EEFT+EEE[�- �E�+t=+ EFL-+ THT[- �EEEt�iiwf�tl "..•'�ZaHi=+EL=�EEEE tV H u n Q00OC10001000IIE»f30i'F� ?�t%410�1OQQOQO ;: a sat.w s°t. uQ.wwwNQ+w s°,. a°.w¢wwae iSZ ¢w c°4 w CO a) SL. w°w LQ N Ru u \ \ \ N. WLWttSUtiW iAfAtN\t�1N33�N3333� \N WNt\t�t\A :-CH tt iii wzzwwwwmzG1Z ww=Z=w=m=mwm v^ rt -4 M n ,it N . t-t "£ii L° 0 04N 0 rI 0 SF of O N ei t'.t E*i to .rt ::� r. r? rat ct ,-t r, rt .-t ftl rj iXi %i ;'�a' t'w :'1:: £• 1 1 ! i t 1 i k" o, iv t In c4pt1 NCO0.0, -' vO qn' N C.7 C9 t.,,-tLNtvf+iNC (4N INrC- 1 Aga I