The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1987/05/13 - Agenda PacketO :� --- c COMMISSION -, ,. AGENDA 197 t> MONDAY MAY 18,198T 7:30 "P.m FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN PUBLIC HEARIN Lions Park Community Center 9183 Base Line ikoad Rancho Cucamonga, CkErornia L PLEDGE OF ALLEC L&WCE EL ROLL CALL Commissioner Blakesley_,' Commissioner McNiei,_ Commissioner Chitiea Commissioner 'Tolstoy_,, Commissioner Bmerick,� I 1 lit. DRAFT EN6Itt£)iiMEN`PAI- IMPACT REPORT �} Staff will provide an overview of the environmental review proem and status of the report. Public Input IV. FOOTHffAL BONI"ARD sPECIPiC PLAN: A. PROGRESS OIL PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW B. OVERVIEW OF SECONDARY POLICY ISSUES (Continued from April 311th) • Community Design • Arohiteetural issues Public Hearing SITE SPECIFIC LAND USE DwSIGNATiONS o Automoti ,,te Uses within the Corridor o Extension of Community Commercial District northerly along � Etlwa; da Avenue o Speciolty Commercial along the south side of Foothill in Subarea 1 o Mixed Use/Retail at the northeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard Public Hearing Cz SUBAREA LAND USE P,7G0 })1ATJONS AND DE"WELOPMENT StMARMIt- 0 �Aaster Plan Provisions (Pg. 9-1) -.Aj)bareq 1(Pp. 9 -2 'Ehrough S-6) o. 94barea 2 (Pgs. 9 -7 through 9 -11) o Subarea 4 (Pp. 9- 6 through 9 -20) Publzc Hearing IV. !lil OUI MMMW?tT% It is recemmended that .0e 3pecifle Aan hearing be continued io the Planning 04hum!sAOp "*egWar meeting date of dtme 24, 1987. The meeting'wM take ice, =E: at Uors Park Community a 1 Center„ 3161 Base .Line Roed, Rancho Cucamonga, begiming of 1:00 p m. I I 6!� O O F � Z U i> May 18, 1987 isn Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner Alan Warren, Associate Planner FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN A public hearing and WVrksnGp oconsiadr the pr�`ovisions of the Draft Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. I. BACKGROUND: This meeting is a continuation of the Planning a, ss� workshop review process for the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan which was initiated on April 30, 1987, At that meeting, the Planning Commission provided the plan consultant and staff with direction on the primary policy issu ?s and a good portion of the sec,ary policy issues. Tonight, wd anticipate that we will complete the secondary issues and begin a page by Oage analysis of the standards and regulations. Further, any additional comments on the Community Background (Part I) and Development Framework (Part II) of the text should be brought up at this time. II. PROGRESS TO DATE: On April 30, 1987, Planning Commission direction was provicted on the following issues: Issue: The Planning Commission , determine the appropriateness of the overall corridor dsign concept in attaining a unique and unifyind design for Foothill Boulevard. The Planning Commission voiced favorable comments regarding the overall concepts of activity centers and gateways in conjunction with the suburban parkway transitions. More emphasis was suggested for the gateway concept in presenting a positive community identity. Some concern was voiced over the "formal" desigf.':concept of the activity centers. It was felt that a strict formal concept might not be compatible with some of the existing- development (especially in the Sycamore Inn /Bear Gulch area). Issue: SUuld the commercial /office acreage along the corridor be increased from 252 acres to approximately 359 acres. f ;r DATE: TO: FROM: r BY: , SUBJECT: �s 6!� O O F � Z U i> May 18, 1987 isn Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner Alan Warren, Associate Planner FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN A public hearing and WVrksnGp oconsiadr the pr�`ovisions of the Draft Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. I. BACKGROUND: This meeting is a continuation of the Planning a, ss� workshop review process for the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan which was initiated on April 30, 1987, At that meeting, the Planning Commission provided the plan consultant and staff with direction on the primary policy issu ?s and a good portion of the sec,ary policy issues. Tonight, wd anticipate that we will complete the secondary issues and begin a page by Oage analysis of the standards and regulations. Further, any additional comments on the Community Background (Part I) and Development Framework (Part II) of the text should be brought up at this time. II. PROGRESS TO DATE: On April 30, 1987, Planning Commission direction was provicted on the following issues: Issue: The Planning Commission , determine the appropriateness of the overall corridor dsign concept in attaining a unique and unifyind design for Foothill Boulevard. The Planning Commission voiced favorable comments regarding the overall concepts of activity centers and gateways in conjunction with the suburban parkway transitions. More emphasis was suggested for the gateway concept in presenting a positive community identity. Some concern was voiced over the "formal" desigf.':concept of the activity centers. It was felt that a strict formal concept might not be compatible with some of the existing- development (especially in the Sycamore Inn /Bear Gulch area). Issue: SUuld the commercial /office acreage along the corridor be increased from 252 acres to approximately 359 acres. f i The Commissioners . voiced some concern over the level of commercialization,, but were generally comfortable with the of regional - related;(commercial activities proposed adjacent to the I- a' 15 FrZeway., '@ Commission recognized that the regional related commercial area forms the majority of the commercial acreage �. i ncreas.e. Issue: Should the regl(w ally related commercial zone Al l oag for businesses which will not only complement but may also compete with the business types'anticlgated for tk-4 future mall? The Planning Commission felt that the uses allowed within this district should be expanded to include many of those contained in the proposed Co4mnity C(mn►ercial zone, to allow greater range of uses. This recommendation. =4aas made with the provision that some fi mechanism be included in the plan which regn1res the development of a regional related commercial use within each development, C Issuer Can a comercial /residential mixed use scenario be planned and dea> loped successfully under a raster plan concept? If so, what spcalfic uses would be appropriate within this land use category? The mixed use /retail (MU /R) zone concept was accepted by the Commissioners. 'The requirement of master planning was the key to the Commissioners` favorable view, In one of the areas cq Foothill Boulevard where the MU/ii district is proposed, its enactment was viewed as an opportunity for property owners to work togei -her on masker planning large sections of land which currently exhibit significant development problems. Issuer Does the . Specialty+ Commercial designation provide sufficient activity allowances and .appropriate limitations to ensure specialized development of key poin,, of interest and landmarks? The use of the Specialty Commercial designation to fine tune the development potential of activity centers of special significance was favorably received. Review of the district regulations is still needed to specifically define appropriate uses and standards of development for each area.. Issue: Are traffic control measures appropriate to ensure a safe circulation system while providing adequate access for the viability of commercial developments? i The Commissioners concurred with the need to implement- median island construction, intersection improvements, and access limitation regulations in order to successfully handle the anticipated traffic along the corridor. Issue: The Planning Commission should consider the appropriateness of the recomianded alignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive versus the other alternatives. The Commissioners favored the Advisory Committee,-'s recommendation for the realignment of Red }mill Country Club Drive. Final determination of this alignment is to be withheld until a City - initiated traffic study cn the area is completed. The traffic study was suggested by tFr City Engineer in response to a traffic analysis performed by the consultant to owners of properties iffected by the realignment. Extension of Estacia Avenue Issues: 1) Should access be prohibited or severeli limited to San Bernardino Road? 2) If so, should access to the area be as proposed? A Planning `.oMmission concensus was reached on this issue which recommends that the Plan include the -following: A. Access to ;an Bernardino Road should be allowed for residential development only, and B. Direct access to San Bernardino Rod for commercial uses should not. be allowed, and C. Two points of access•on Foothill Boulevard and one point of dceess opposite Estaci,a Avenue should be identified, around which a master plan for development would be required. Iss.ie: San Diego Avenue realignment. The Commission considered alternatives for the realignment or aband3nment of San Diego Avenue. It was determined that the ultimate vacation of San Diego Road is desirable but only upon development of an approved master plan for the area between Vineyard Avenue and Cucamonga Creek Flood Channel. Issue: San Bernardino Road. Realignment. The Planning Commission concurred with the propos,d realignment of San Bernardino Road. III. DISCUSSION: For this meeting, the Planning Commission should con roue a review of those items outlined at the April 30 meeting. These issues are discussed in the attached issue papers and include the following: SECONDARY POLICY ISSUES (Continued from April 30tt) o Community Design 0 Architectural Issues SITE -- SPECIFIC LAND USE DESIGNATIONS o Automotive Uses within the Corridor o Extepsion of Coimaity Comercial District northerly along Etiwanda Avenue o, Specialty Connercial along the Louth side of Foothill in Subarea I o Mixed Use/Retail at the northeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard SUBAREA LAND USE REGULATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS o Master Plan Provisions (pg. 9-11 o Subarea 1 (p9s. 9-2 through 9-61 o Subarea 2 (pg$ 9-7 through 9-11) o Subarea 4 (pgs. 9-1b through 9-20) The attached chart shows where we are in the suggested "roadwp" of review. IV. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Co+wission camp e5 its Thitial review of the Draft Specific Plan and p"rovide the consultant and staff with direction for amendment where needed. The hearing should be continued to a scheduled meeting date at which a revised plan will be submitted for Planning Coinmission review and action. 4Resp full fitted, Brad Ter City ity larniner BB:AW:te ;:ttachments: Exhibit I - Specific Plan Process Review Chart Exhibit 2 - Issue Pape7s Exhibits 3 and 4 - Issue Paper Maps is J 444 � 8.1 OVERALL COiMIHITY DESIGN COIXEPT (Section 7.5) This section contains specific design guidelines which implement the objectives of the activity center /suburban parkway concept. The components of this section as noted on pages 7 -5 through 7 -9 contain the following components: o Subarea Structure o Activity Center o Suburban Parkway o Overail Architectural Concept o Overall Landscape Architectural Concept Issue: The Planning Commissi+�n should, determine the appropriateness of these design coearjonents within the overall design ccncept for the corridor. L B.2 ARCHITECTURAL ISSUES One of the more recognizable aspect$.• of a komMunity design image is that of its architectural style. The Advisory Committee deliberated extensively on What architectural style should be encouraged as an aspect of community identity. The importance of this issue is exemplified by the plans Jverall Statement: "Goal: To create a dynamic concourse that is attractive and of high quality with a unifying design image, reflective of community heritage and iaeatity...." Discussion: Concern was voiced early on that the community does not have a. single identifiable architectural theme, but exhibits a diversity of styles which were identified as winery, mission, California b4Irn, 1930's Route 66, agricultural heritage, etc. The Committee resolved not to limit architecture to a single theme or style. Rather, it was decided that architecture should borrow certain elements from historical styles found in Rancho Cucamonga. This view resulted in an architectural concept (Rancho Cucamonga Heritage) which 1. Encourages the use of elemenT° from these types along the Corridor with pro ions for design compatibility, 2. The use of a single sty of architectural element is not a part of this plan. i i� LZ EXHfiW 2 0 EXH[Brr 2 i 3. Encouragement of design them9s on a site -by -site basis is encouraged and provided for at activity v centers and key features (Section 8.2 - 8.4).. ._ Issue: W11 an architectural program made 'up ,T different r distinct styles be able do fora a utsM-Yiaig - design concept for ' the Corridor? Staff Analysis: Staff believes the Advisory Committee's recomadati -on has- definite potential within the overall design framework so long as distinct architectural s' stylesltheraes are implemented at each activity center. In this manners corpatit)e architectural diversity can act as a unifying,velemmment 1n the suburban parkway, streetscape while maintaining distinct architectural styles at key activity nodes/centers. f As an alternative, the Plannipg Commission may wish Ito consider narrowing the bane,` of architectural styes to be designated along the entire length of the boulevard. 0 EXH[Brr 2 8.3 SITE SPECIFJP. ISSUES: a. Issue: Stmould autemative related uses be elimmloated along the Corr1dor -2 The proposed plan permits automotive fl related uses in portions of the area. However, concerns were voiced toot automobile services -may not be / ' appropriate al a revitalized Foothill Boulevard and that such uses should be located in the Industrial Area. b. Issue: Should the community commercial extend�i%,�irtherly an additional 300 feet along the northwest ,corner of ( Foothill and EtManda? Staff has concerns on the apptnpriateness of extendiq.g commercial activity northerly into the predominantly residential Etiwanda Specific Plan, ,,,(Exhibit 31 t c. Issue ` Should the south. 'ilde of Fcgthill Boulevard opposite the Sjvcamore Inn be included in the Specialty Csomercial nistrict? Staff has concerns on the viability of such a large area designated solely for- Zpecialiy Commercial uses. (Exhibit 4) d. Issue: Is the mixed use designation on the north side of foothill, east of Etivanda Avenue, appropriate? In light of the Comammissions concern about the account of comwcial? Current land use ,designation is Medium Residential, $ -14 dwelling units per acre. (Exhibit 3) Staff will need the Commission's direction'in these areas. s C. "" !SLGMUT Si'AWWS 'The Planning Commission should review the permitted uses In Part III of the Development Standards for all land n3e categories, as follows: 1 o Master Plan Provisions (Pg. 9 -1) o Subarea I (pgs. 9 -2 through 9 -6) o Subarea 2 (pgs. 9 -7 through 9 -11) o Subarea 4 (pgs. 9 -16 through 9 -20) EXNWiT, n1, ` N N , N o EXHIBIT v (:MvF- EXHIBIT LA f a ,CITY OF ^' :..- Cam' RANCHO CUCANMIGA _ c�4... r Q �� {�,� UN ��j ngCle�g� �X,1 TOlYllIlJV1V3 i ' AGENDA J _z - r k . t97T WEDNESDAY MAY 13, 1987 7:(W p.m. ? < ?LYONS PARK COMMUNITY CENTER y, 9161 BASE LIKE a " RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIPORNFI! L PteslgP. of Allegiance ,? IL 6wearing in Ceremony of David Blakesk,' - Beverly Authelot, City Clark s i Iii.. Roll Call Commissioner Biakesley� Commissioner Chitiea 0cmmiss over McNiel Commissioner.F.mericls _ Commissioner.'Polstoy it'. 41moval of Minutes'' 90bruary 25, 1987 March 25, 1987 V. . Announcements YL Consent Calendar The following Consent Calendar items are expeated to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be 'acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern; over any item, it should be removed for discussion. r, EAVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVh W 87 -18 - REITER - The development of. three researceh /development buildings totaling 132,540 square feet od,.6.37 acres of Iand, within an approved Master Flan, in an industrial Park District Subarea &, located at the northwest corner of Utica Avenue and Bentley. Street - APX 210481 -18. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT, REVIEW 85 -29 - GENERAL MARBLE - The development of a 45,000 square foot buildr�g addition to an existing 40,000 square toot building on 5.36 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 2) located on the north side of 9th Street between Vineyard and Heilman Avenues - APN 209 - 012 -04, 05, and 06. '" -."�q +c+^'Fdu "'3.r ^•PiNI�' 4 ` y G. TIME 'j-'15316N FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 12171 - STEPl1gENu� (?' - A. eustam lot subdivision of six '66 lots on 3,3 acres of land in the Very Low Density Residential %i n q; District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located at the northwest corner of'Klusman Avenue and Whirlaway Street - - A -PN 1061- 511 -06 and 07. VIL t�ublie Hearings The following items are public hearings inJ hick concerned individuals may voice their opinion o the elated ' y p f 7 project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairmi ' M address the Commission by stating your name and adctiess. All such . opinions shat., be limited to S minutes per individual for each project. D. MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85 -03 - CHRISTIAN FAMILY FELLOWSHIP - An existing church within a 1,650 square font space located in a General Industrial District on the east side of Archibald, south of 6th Street, in Subarea 4, of the Industrial Specific Plan - APN 210- 071 -47 and 48. t E. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -03 - RANCHO EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH - A proposal to locate a church within an existing 2,595 square foot professional. building located at 89W,Arcbibald within the General Industrial District (Subarea 4) - APN 209- 171 -15. F. ENVIR.ONMEI TAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE. TRACT 13440 - THE WIL. -,AAM LYON COMPANY - A residential tract subdivision'` of 24 acres of land into 111 single family lots its the Low- Medium Density Residential District (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) within the Victoria Planned Community, located on the south side of Highland Avenue, norRtx:ast of Keyon Way - APN 227- 011 -67. G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 13634 - WILLIAM LYON COMPANY -� A total residential development of 306 condominium units on 24.67 acres of land in the Medium (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) and Medium -High (14-24 dwelling units per acn:) J'i Residential Districts within the Victoria Planned Community, located at the northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Milliken Avenue - APN 202 - 211 -13 and 14. H. EN'VIROlYMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND W ITIONAL a USE PERMIT 85 -3? MODIFICATION)-- MASCAJ[tNAS - A request to modify an approved conceptual Master Plan- from one restaurant pad to the developm,ent`' of a 2,2.00 square foot fast food d_rim —through restaurant and a 1,150 square foot retail buiidi,ni'bn 0.84 acres of land within a, 9.Q acre approved shopping center in the General Commercial District, located at the northwest corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center ' rive - APN 1077- 401 -22. (Continued from April. 8,1987). L ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 10393 - KhrfH /LUSK COMPANY - A subdivision o: 79y2 -acres of land into 33 parcels in the g` (' Industrial Park District, Subarea 16, located at the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 4th Street - APN 210 - 062 -13, 11, 02, 26, 33, and 32, Related File TAR: 86 -37. (Continued from Apri1.8,1987). J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ArD CONDITIONAL °v ITSE PERMIT 87 -06 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA REALTY PROPERTIES IL LTD - A request to serve alcoholic f beverages within an established 3,700 square foot restaurant within the Neighborhood Commercial District (NO located at the northeast corner of 19th and Archibald (9740 19th Street) - APN 202- 171 -57. (Continued from April 22, 1087). K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE 86 -02 H. T. i. CONSTRUCTION Regm.sts to decrease the minimum. building setback and required landscape average along 8th Street, reduction of sideyard setback along railroad right- of -wa_v and elimination of outdoor eating areas for a proposed [..ulti- tenant industr gal project located at the northeast corder of Baker Aven6 and 8th Street APN 207- 271 -01. (Related File: DR 36 -43). WM New Business L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86 -37 - KEITH /LUSK COMPANY - The development of a Master Plan for a 79.17 acre industrial park consisting --f 33 lots in an Industrial Park District, Subarea 16, located at the northwest quadrant of 4th Street and Archibald Avenue - APN 210- 062 -02, 11, 13 26, 32 and 33. Related Pile: PM 10393. (Continued from April By 1987). i w M. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT FbEYTEW 86-43 - H. T. L CONSTRUCTION � The deval`opnlent. of 8 multi tenK,'kt industrial buildings totaling, 38,458 square=,:leet on 2.5 acres\'& land in the General Industrial District ( Subarea, 1), loeateci on the north east Y, corner o nth Street and Baker Avenue - APN 20.'- 271 -01. (Related F•ilec VA 86 =09). ' N. ENVIRONMENTAL `�SSJE$SMENT AND DEVELOPMFfNT REVIEW 87 -11,- GE'NERAjz --P NAM CS -The development o a Field Measurement Iln� ility consisting of three buildings that total 4,000 square feet on 3.72 acres of land in the Gen(kral Industrial District (Subarea 10), loeatod on ' the west sWe of Milliken i venue soutu of the Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad tracKs - APN 209 - 272 -03. O. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT RRY MIV 37-01 'DAVIS DEVELOPMENT - A al to cons uct two medium wholesale distrriibution r facilities tote ff 150,640 square feet in the General Endustrial Dist,�al Subarea 8 on 6.5 arrest of land at the port est i corgi r of Arrow Highway and Maple Place - AIL N 208 ,i61- 12. P. TRACT 10827-2 DESIGN REVIEW - U. S. HOMES - 'DcA.,"n review of building elvations and plot plans oreyiously approved and recorded tract map s:unsisting of 99 single family lots on 14.2 acres of land in the Low (2-4 dwelling Y units /acre) and Low- Medium (4-8 dwelling units /acre) 1 Residential Districts, located between haven Ave 'rm land He -nosa Avenue, north of Banyan Street - APN 29156301 thr'vugh 3 -1,'201- 573 -01 through 42, and 201-583- 01 through f 20. f Q. MODIFICATION TO TRACT 13059 (DESIGN REVIEW) REPUBLIC. - A request to modify the conditions of approval to permit wood fencing on corner side yards for Tract 13059 '(Design. Review) for 137 single family lots on 25.8 acres of land within the Victoria Planned Community (Low- Medium Residential, 4 -8 dwelling units per'' acre) located on the west side of Fairmont Lane, north of the Southern Pacific Railroad - APN 232- 211 -13 and 38. UL Director's Reports R. VICTORIA LAKES - Oral Report I .4 Y f Z S. R AND APMOVAL OF ENiT3tY MONUMENT iYALL LOt•�A�F1{S T. R l riN C CN SITE COMMUCTION SIGN FOR THE PL Q OS7EU YicTO1 A GARDE'RS? BEGTONAL a NFO'PPSXG '4 3 .s W_A, ' � Ca�n►isBuginess 1 i X Prjj;li n malts This is -thd time and place for the gertercil publk, to address the r w" Commission items to be discussed here' thii a which do not^ -" already appear on this agenda. `. -"JL Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 p.m. adjournment time. if items go beyorid trot 4:,ne, they;shail be heard only with the consent of the Commtgsidr`4 OF, ;I t .. t•- - _._.�� j- ................. - - Yxq SFM ME OF INFLUENCE d ; CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA i� P! f �1 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: _s --- CITY OF RANC O CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT G��Q m May 13, 1987 Chairman and Members of the Planning Gommissiorr Brad Buller, City Planner Nancy Fong; Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -18, - Kr. LILK - ine oevelopment ar tilree researc eve op,% -en u !ngs totaling 132,540 square feet on 5.37 acres of land, within an approved Master Plan, In an Industrial Park District Subarea; 5, located at the northwest corner of Utica Avenue and Eantley Street — APN: 210- 081. -18, I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Issuance of a Negative Declaration B. Surroundin 'hand Use and Zoning: or - Vacant; n !rs rya ar district - Subarea 6 South - Vacant; Industrial Park District - Subarea 6 and Haven Overlay District East - .Vacant, General Dynamics; General Industrial Districts Subarea 11 West - Office complex under construction, Vacant, Industrial Park District Subarea b, Haven Overlay District C. General 11 an Designations: roiec e , sous r a ark North - Industrial Park and Haven Overlay District S: ,4th - Industrial Park and Haven Overlay District East - General Industrial West - Industrial Park and Haven Overlay District 0. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant and covered witty a an one vTneyar and native vegetation. Natural ground .slopes gently southward about 3% gradient. E. Parking Calculations: Type Square Parking Nimber of Number of Spaces Spaces of Uae Footage Ratio Required Provided Research/ Development 132,540 1/350 378 378 f7 . - ` PLANNIHG,.9:0*tjSsiaN STAFF REPORT (.s DR 87 -18t, REMR May 13, 1987 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS-. A. General. The applicant is requesting an environmental assessment for the construction of three.-research/development buildings totaling 132,940 square feet. Upon approval of .a ., Negative Declaration, the CIV Planner wily grant approval of the project based en the conditions of the Design an$ Technical Rev! —Commi ttees.. B. Design Review Committee: Design Review Committee McNiel, Coleman Colemani reviewed` this project or< April 16, 1987, and recommended approval with the following coiditlon�: 1. The first three parking spaces at eacb,of the driveway entrances on Trademark Parkway should be eliminated to mitigate traffic conflict. 2. The .building entry on the east - elevation should be flared out as in the north elevation. 3. An average' 25 feet of landscaping should be provided along Utica Avenue, �`. C. Environmental Assessment: Staff has completed an Environmental Cneckllst -and has determ ned that no significant adverse impact would,-occur as a result of tnis project. Further, a Negative Declaration has been issued for the approved Master Plan on September 11, 1985. III. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration or Development Review 87 -18. Re!s?p!ftfully submitted l Bra Bu e City Planner BBNF:vc I Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site. Utilization Map Exhibit "C" - Approved Master Plan for Gateway Exhibit "D" - Detailed Site Plan for Phase II Exhibit "E" - Conceptual Grading Plan for Phase II Exhibit "F" -- Conceptual Landscape-Plan for Phase II Exhibit "G" - Prospective View Exhibit "N" - Elevations �,'W NMTH CITY OF A Ar RANCHO CUCAMOTNTGA 7yrLF--- PLANNING DIVSQq EXHIBrr.- t —s—lb OMC" — _ Tq t.t _ RaVOYtQ MAN I i ci �.n(ar�mwes _ EiWMp .+�. �� YaauiachKtnpl Y1in�eufa DuCSNy. hYti r . s V NORTH CITY Off':' s P�._NCI- C� C TCAPJIO M � a. 7(1 A PLANNINU DIVL CXN XHtIi1T: _ .. StA.E:�_ r I _ l p 1 1a1MQ 'aVaaYaw�a •��iYy oaYYr Y�aYYra�tiM ti� lea�'r�MrrwY�ti was A w _ AYE V y w�� d LAND U82 PLAN THE GATEWAY I RANCHO CUCAMONGA..CALIROANIA ♦ 1f+lsafalrr a ; TN tltiii• {41'7[1 tifi(tlftfllt CL. '. :fYf1T L 1111Tf1 lllt itfOtll,T1f ' ♦f�RT111yf� MNIt1fYe� .. 1 I V !'I NOR'Y H !I CIW OF RANCHO CUQkMaNGA s PLANNING Djv S oN ' •� � ' -,-'_' .� ' � +mil ............... oil E _ _ ° Q' rf e r .' I �� n:;•;�(_i !III ! ! �� ,1 I�r• � � � � -.; �� ,Q� ` -,} a a" G T d t �` o t M Y . Ell 8 U �. I,I i. �i w , a b t � 5 i! j� ti a I r t�7 ii .w +r iiqut v h i �i1 s; 11111141 = 4 3 4 i ll { e 6 6Y i � a i \ � \ �R }/� / LL� Ift - Ir - 'YRT_F! �t--va raov J`O UTld E E VFI 7-1 V u y. wn oatmmi eotrcrsrs re.. Art r owr.urur.a uQ..w.wadcmaan.. ftauv a.se.:�. a.v. CI'T'Y OF RANCHO CUCANTONGA. PLANNING DNWSI()N MRTH rrFa'4I= �' TITLE: _ EXtiMrr -_ ° SCAM 9-// CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, odl C A � DATE: May 13, 1987 M-77 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY Chris Westman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSES NT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85 -29 - e devejopment or a 45,00 square foot building a cmion to an existing 40,000 square foot building on 5.36 aches of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 2) located an the north side of 9th Street between VineyArd and Heilman Avenues APP)i 209 -012 - 4, 5, 6. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action P.eq'iested: Issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning; or - Industriai, Subarea-T- South - Industrial, Subarea 2 East - Vacant, Subarea 2 West Vacant, Subarea i C. General Plan. Designations: Project - enera Industrial/Rail Served _ North - General Industrial /Rail Served South - General Industrial /Rail Served East - General industrial /Rail Served West - General Industrial /Rail Served D. Site Characteristics. The project site includes an existing 7413, 000 square Too.' rail served manufacturing /warehouse facility. The properties adjacent to the east and west are vacant, and to the north' and south are developed industrial projects. ITEM 8 J t 7 gym. PLANNING CO SSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT` REVIEW 85 -29; - GENERAL MARBLE r. May 13, 1987 r. Page 2 :, t= F. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking "spaces Spaces of Use Footage Rat €o i'lequ(Ad Provided --- —� Warehouse 45,000 IY1008 1/2000 1/4000 31 31 II. ANALYSISs- A. General: The applicant is request€ns environmental assessment or a 5,000: square foot manufacturing /warehouse building, Upon approval of the Negative Declaration, the City Planner will grant final iipproval of the project based on conditions recommended by the Design and Technical- Review Co ittees.'' t Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Chitiea, c el, Coleman) rev ewed the proji ct 'on April 2, 1987 and' recommended that it be forwarded to the Planning Commission with the following conditions: ' 1. the screen wall along 9th Street should be of a .oncrte tilt -up material that matches the overall building. The design of the metal roiling gates should also have a screening effect i such as a louvered metal material. 1 a 2. A ten (10) foot wide landscape planter should be j provided at the west property line for - approximately 280 feet north fray the pibii'c right -of -way: The landscaping should be densely planted in order to sufficiently screen storage and loading activity from public view and include tall specimen -size trees to sufficiently screen the equipment on the west side of the existing building. 3. An employee plaza area should be provided along the north property line- Amenities such as seating, trellis cover,..-..d landscape screening <, should be provided wihin the employee plaza" area. J t PLANNING COWISSION., xT REPORT " DEVEtOPMENT R VIEW 8, 2-9 - GENERAL 14A,RBtE i/ May ,13, Ia$ �� a Page ,3 .. 4. Berining trees, vines and shrubs should be pro+ided adjacent to the screen walls along 9th Street. ' 5. The roll -up doors shoax ]d be painted to "blend into " >{ the buil d ing. In. addition, tha Committee requested alternative designs for the office entry, The applicant will be submitting alternatives for the Committee to review at their meeting of May 7, 1987, B. Environmental Assessment: Parts I and II of the Initial Study nave been completed and no significant impacts have been found - related to the construction of the proposed building. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The propG;;4d use is consistent with -..the general an and Industrial Specific .plan. The building design and site plan, together with recommended conditions of approval, are in compliance ;,with the Industrial Specific ` Plan and all other;;' applicatle City standards. r; IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission issue a e9a ve Declaration for DR 85 -29. Res tful 1 .i tied, a MBraBuller - City Planner BB:CW :te Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Mar, Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Elevations Exhibit "D" - Grading Plan r t > 1 E -l� , -- E F7 i \Ufti RANCHO McAmo A =- jzAmat MAR PLANNING DIVE t EXIgIM r= SCALD tom CITY Of. -pr-8� -r i RANCHO CUCANIONrA _ :5, P 9 PLANNING DIVL90N s -s ?-W NOIM, rte» �• ( � , t� j - �, �i . 'IMORTIt MAVATM All, pq ' f YMr•rN W4.ar �r.MJ. Wf.i I� CITY Or. a' RANCHO CUCANIONGA mug =.a cs BANNING ®IVb-M EXHIC31ri'=. SCALD 'tip {i ��} `1 ii� alli {1 12 }a ri: re :• b 1} iT� it �i �Y. I } ` .} YS ' f tr a °T l .�3 iS ¢3i -�.' r ,iji }:tt } � ;1� { ij'- ,° :x I -� { s � s r Y s : c �1 r y° • ,: a }5 � � }1 �Is� st�i ix 3 � iI xF - STI Ft it ! • • i � : ; I it It {i! _it =3I1 i li x `• v > a } 3! a }a U Trt T R L I +CIF., It .1� • s... TV ..{ e I i it • {. " CITY or rrrau � PLANNING I?IVL�Ka' -x -`�— Exfi1�rr =� SCA c =_t F' 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA wCr STAFF REPORT 4!7 U i1 �^ a > DATE: May 13, 1987 IF'7 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Bull City Planner BY: Scott MurOhy;, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 12171 - STEPHENSON - A. cus om lot su v s on of six lots on s.J acres o and in the,:.Yery Low Density Residential District (less than two dwel11119 units/acre ), located at the northwest corner of Klusman Avenue and Whirlaway Street - APN 1061- 511 -06 and 07. I. BACKGROUND: Tentat:je Tract 12171 was iriginaliy approved by the anning C amission on May X26, 19821 two time extensions have been granted ty the Planning Commission - A two - year extension was approved by'jthe Planning Commission on May 23, 1984 and a one -year time extens ion was approved on May 14, 1.986. When the time extension wa,f approved on May 14, 19F the resolution indicated that the map would expire on May 14, 1987. According to the Subdivision Map Act, a tentative tract map may be extended up to five years from the date of map approval. Therefore, the applicant would h.lve until May 26, 1987, to record the final map. The applicant's is requesting that the map be extended until May 26,' 1987. Tne applicant is working with the .ngineering Division.to prepare the final map and agreements for recordation. _ II. ANALYSIS: Staff has analyzed the proposed time extension and has compare the proposal with the development criteria outlined in the City's Development Code. Based upon this rev *ew, the project meets the Basic Residential Development Standards of the Development Code for the Very Low District except for the mini►aum net average lot area of 22,500 square feet. This tract's average -lot size! is approximately 20,678 square feet. All lots within this tract, do meet the minimum lot size requirement of 20,000 square feet. Equestrian easements have not been provided for this tract and the property owner /applicant originally intended that the keeping of horses would be prohibited in the CC A R's. The Equestrian Advisory Capnittee recommended that the existing drainage easement' serve as the equestrian easement,;along the west and south tract t� t PLANNING GOMMISSION S-T.AFF REPORT TIME EXTENSION tT 12111 - STEPHENSON •` May 18, 1987 Page. 2 1 boundaries, and:that said easement be refledted on the final tract map and final grading and drainage plan, The Standard Condition of, ,approval {A43) regarding provisions for trails was made a /requirement of Tentative Tract 12171. This condition stains that equestrian trails shall, be,lprovided in accordance wittl the Equestrian Trail Plan anci ,r'rc equestrian trail sUA'ards. Also, the plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to recordation of the final map. c e III. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approvee i'�i ee €3'me extension to May 26, 1987, through adoption of the attached resolution. *esp e r lly suh itted, er r City Planner s 88:SN:te Attachments: Letter from Applicant r. Exhibit "A" - Location Flap Exhibit "B" -Tract Map Resolution 8z -52 `; Time Extension Resolution of Approval q GENERAL VENTURES INCORPORATED 16776 BERNARDO CENTER` (DRIVE # 1108 crn 9 r ti C. SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92128 (619) 485 -0980 May 5, 1987 Dan CT)leman, Senior Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga' i Plannnin&j Department 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Sub3ect: Time Extention for TentaY ve Tract 12171 s� Dear Hr.'Coleman: Per our telephone vonversation today, we are requesting- a;i extention for the tentative,-tract 121,'1 because of delays caused by unavailability at= the �,;bontractor chosen for street improvements to complete the bonds required by the city. We have completed most other requirements, and are working with Linda .Peak in your engineering depa.-tment to complete the requirements for the final' trip filing refore the deadline, but we are concerned that circumstances beyond our control may hold it up beyond the expiration date. We have enclosed the $62.01' extention fee, and respectfully request this extention. Your assistance is appreciated very much. Sincerely, r T. G. Ste hen on P President it � !Y J C n t b V � J�1 e t V J i.l 1 � ¢ C r: *r � TLflY{.wt'�•'iv.�i� EA TOMMIE [g 'r.. M i I :CJs w . IN TEE MYOFRANt�+II QJCANK r COUNT`; OF SlW 6ERN_4MM STATE OF CAGFORMA BfitUCs.0.L`tvtStC1J QF'1L'.E SCt.i1u&4tlY Fi'aET'CF ARYRS1O1.1 CrF�G` CIOA2A1.56G7'to1322 /1'aMxt'a+tp N' 1! l {+ICTwii'1.1 S24UtSC."WG.'ST �fl'@sc"�2AiAliOlklwl 6YZlCd, CQ�R1t 4F 3�112�.U.:tD11,L7tST,Qt%GF GAL�S72u r.�ol�Tx MY GF- ITEM c5 /d�S� RANCHO CLVAM(X�Gk TITLE.��'�' PLANNING DIVISM EXHIBIT = — SCALE t lr !Y J C n t b V � J�1 e t V J i.l 1 � ¢ C r: *r � TLflY{.wt'�•'iv.�i� EA TOMMIE [g 'r.. M i I :CJs w . IN TEE MYOFRANt�+II QJCANK r COUNT`; OF SlW 6ERN_4MM STATE OF CAGFORMA BfitUCs.0.L`tvtStC1J QF'1L'.E SCt.i1u&4tlY Fi'aET'CF ARYRS1O1.1 CrF�G` CIOA2A1.56G7'to1322 /1'aMxt'a+tp N' 1! l {+ICTwii'1.1 S24UtSC."WG.'ST �fl'@sc"�2AiAliOlklwl 6YZlCd, CQ�R1t 4F 3�112�.U.:tD11,L7tST,Qt%GF GAL�S72u r.�ol�Tx MY GF- ITEM c5 /d�S� RANCHO CLVAM(X�Gk TITLE.��'�' PLANNING DIVISM EXHIBIT = — SCALE t WSM c.MY Llmrr PA _ _ IJ �r rr r._. c.. +� , \ i r ; ' Y � . • K,. ; it `TORTH CITY OF tTE,�z:.>�r�.�=t�a�✓ ,� r�7.� RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE PLANNING DivISK)IN F_XHIBIT•,, 4 SCALE, s RESOLUTION NO. 82_2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING C"ISSION OF THE A ' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIO14ALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12171 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. "12171, hereinafter "Map° submitted by Thomas Stephenson,,applt_ ant, for the purpose of subdi- viding the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a custom lot subdivision on 3.3 acres of 'fand in the R -1- 20,000 zone, located at the northwest covner of Whirlaway Street and Klusman Avenue -.APN 1061 -611- 06 and 07 into 16 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and >action on May. 26, 1982; and �{ t WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommends -, approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and , ' WHEREAS, the Planning CmAission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 12171 and the Map thereof: (a) Vw tentative tract is consistent with all applicable 'inztrim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable z +grim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of de- velopment proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause i substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems,, (f) Thn design of the-tentative tract will not confi ct with any easement acquired by the public at largt,:now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. ` Re�dluta'ao No. R 5" Page (g) That .h;s ;,roj�t will not crests adverse impacts, on the environment and a Negative Declaration is Issued. ' SECTION 2: Tentative Trait Mo p No. 121,, a copy of which is attached hereto,'is hereby apprp�ed` subject to all of the i'olloging \� conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIV,ISION 1. The required setbacks as shown'on the Tentative Trac4' Map shall be shown -oc the recorded Final Tract Map. APPROVb AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DIY OF MAY, 1982. PLANNING COMMISSION -iF � C111F OF RANCHO�CUCAMONGA BY:- Jeff fteyl K ng, ha an Secretary of ne P arming Co�mtntssion I, JACK `rAA ,Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,'ao hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution -was :duly and;, regular ^ly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission or the City of Rancho Cucamonga, -t a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of May, 1982,.:by the following vote -to- +Nit: AYES: M- AISSIONERS: Rempel, Stout, King, Sceranka, 7ols'toy NOES COMMISSIONERS': None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None 1 1 j ,3 o b tl W Y Ank .+u DG' u qY O d C9 j Gb.D t'L N LY9 eL GNyEE O N WaG nu b: � u A d L G Y tY y ' ^ V 7U cu 4 .... Q ut NQ A >G Nd4 yp ON ? n °u A b' O Lov 5 V �q v y L 6`q r°au GNVT �b tlt Ap 24 bO _y d °u fyEyV E Y O wV' Y q w LGy C ... yn .y �q CCgGt Y C Fuca C wy� d Oy it d¢ G3< g- w2 oa - Zu ciic a v.. �aa- L Na p rW 4'a'v a �.=a,w°c.. o �. «eq If1 ?w �' �tgdL .L. °c '°'.oe y;=.. n^�0p Y�v9W o- L 'e^'nM yy. y'D w.`� p c' E°E9 c� v uv u�M .+ m � O. fS.� D move o 6 Y N C V = V d c% .y C b O n J. N 0¢ Q• D d' d G b Y � O� L N1 � B ^C OD C y ?� yy yl VY >� UA O b CYuO qy EA i. d�� dVyti pAT. K N L. ° u + Y 7 D Y O N O L O ^ Y V i � G tE� e E G+ d b p. .. M y V un o w1�). � �SY u y.°n ^ `.°. N.44 42 y N C U� D 4 N V. aq G V.V C O. y L M °a « C ^ O N w N q 9 C N O b ^` A Y W G� d� yC0 O v9 6 w V _L S'Vpi �i NY. C.6 W& r0. EpEY qN qb �+..0 dD Cb4� D« qqC uu yw OG q^ Cu Yu q >Y r C L< OV M LN br > n G d DG. n 6 1 V9 w Z 2 S U O L dL C.t Y. OVA �N� O C YeO.� Y 4Tq� H'n0 w. 6N i.�.0 O L C V >� { y y n.+ d 6 E L 6 D P O ryE p C O SH. w A A ^ M u G N w L q 0 9 °cm po u , c. °'°y q.%q �° °d -vn u °'° c ✓� yDC �° e� Prnuyi LL °y �°. m .. w � O ♦+z � N Y 6G � K.....+ HfY L� Ni V d o G..a .L+.. do.. .�L qOY L �� pO 4 as�g4�ty_M� f� I i i i� I I 14 •• N `a N Vii. M 0= O i C. w O �� N 1�F Nye r N p a 6 N L b� 7c 1 UA G uN r R vA J r q w LU 6Gf9 N cbL T u a— n ay mo uEJ ti as Td_ N >O 'O = E �w !. t0 2 C•. �^LO L� O b °1 R'O. (I N C ;4o a Up .. ° �,y CL S n a OI O J am {w.Lb O. CN L• a` y w m O L vb" nog. N _, �'-� yu - +..4•,W c ° NaL W l^ J q L L a 1.10 a aU Y N v r°.Z+6 NFL 000 L y V N J A m d X -o~ =L vo?e T ` a p v NJ �` s . c°, ,vN4 ' E N �g acc c��LL O L C m E �q�. Ho �^ �� Gq= b °i( u$ P Lu y�R -- T o�d'cs. _ T V p O@ �c �a♦ =u '. ^fv . °' o W a N m� ncdG oa 6a.N60°.�LOw °u �Nntl�C_ any � ^ a u pu aMbp Nom a ,pL u C y e a L i u MY eti a wm Y A V li + O 9 u N N. UV Uu2 E1:2 C 6 O N.� pp aM aai bG 4 d Lw O.M 66 L b �.0 01W tl. 6i JCta a.TL MN yuO LAEU ^N. 6d. C?! L< ba EEC yy LLV p V��aL ^AT .biM L Y Y qE N C w A M N V C I A O �4 V 6 d r g a O db CJ CNC . L N 4 ^ OL J JT Jd A_r `� R 4 YT wq[a O mN 1 0 J!1 vCO CvUJ vygW A O LOa C Y N _ i Y 2q.y. 3't U J b 0�6v u 0L e Lua c 4N ^ Dqd Ail `-t �ro9 L Nad B�. �9T Cc ... S L M CEV qa A d Y 4Et d E D N L.++G t a m a N w�na � JyA C� i... L V C qL. �C6t0 L LL i nq O �O..0 VN p W V nr.p C C C at. m D•.� EE a n A L L. N G 6 u a- a a 0 4 4 A .-. a L pq Y.. • 9 N a R' CC a N y^ O w'� C S. N p G C _ � NqG V C N wJ'o... 21 a 43 y A�AO) .OG. E i�;x x ., V d +A N Gb� 2 a c d OQ Oi7d b eo a '� '- U> J r _N LM L N m y O. � q ON N pp. Dy Nu �' .G.9�0 C q yOa NKr LZ O yR01 E..A O aN A yN0 UGC � ..C.r tfi� CSC Y FL VAUC' - A qu pN T TR+ c L> Y d. >f. mwC.. G yV�,.ay0 b T. �iOY..ap a� 7N yy C47 wTe V YCOQ L ? >VV Pyp d6 .aka r C G. C1N. bA A. UC GdAT 20C JV U G= 4 "� 1£ J Q .. C E 6 �1 � O 0 u'i z ra WwV plu upp Yf n.UN QNmII. V:O qq .G Q�6 » »E•L-Od �cao r� 1 C Y.R Ou D V V C V a.Y D O ✓ 9 E P 2 N , G vo At LPC �Q ry c HE° E el q v0> c iaLi C A '�.Oia �qu .4 L�eLi L+c W Ny _ � 1 Y O 4 ro • RL 1..°.. ✓ �+IO•• O L� � caw O °N c G Z pR. � 4 O O1 2 9 A . rn O dq L Ym yda d ° OnE 26 d° LI 'L N 9 aA PYpp AO n �o 4 V `L a d. qw. gd cL.t agr°i p a ° i14 .pa 4u` a55 9r JLL FF One '9 6N qqr. q ^Y W Q N <° E tR COQ q q ''• c E 2v2 SCR qC. N w a o` Yt�Fq .mow aR0 L 9 r .0°L .Rrr dM RNO q ✓ E CO �9 6C [] L ac qRO p�V RAY pYO V' L Nw�.L av E j 9�L Nugw 49 yy O M cugd + Va0 y9 EAY bGLR cGa �`y VL90` N Ti MDCrn G- R L� 'flag a NPR y:w E €c 9�40V b. i�y� °�Y 4t /E C > EE G Os °V 94 6V rn C P v N p U rn ]�.. d G v a t{'GaPY b!N ff _ o 'v EOEat R n L. wYN A�GC Na O p. O.w. GYL 3 Cr�OL C.9� paaaVp 1L.m.r dL Y > Rb Oa.Nb 9 up ..°- A u 4 Lp aO L ,a OL qq O. LO C N 11 V ZS N c Yi ° qtr YC`� _d 4 q. cc L.�i M U let CgV1u s 3 A A NCq C?q 9 h 0 V O E ha 26 w ^NYmq °'. 9 Nrq•1 Vt YcL ntvq �M_E 5' y4a .R. 9dN co4w - .2._w, "' ^ cu >E �+ '.-.9 .Z: " F gwL o..0 Yg 4��o Ero '° R _ u9 ? °r ..� EYE " � Y 2 GqI_ �. C � $. = C E a I�+°N RN Y�c.R v NL� w YR w s x °4 U udL� ppR6 w> J qydY L t La RC OS r E d2 5.1 4C O N UNm qc.. u Y tL. Dy C6 Lea O >f N O: NrnN L`g VCY � M.� SC w> Q @O�y� €9� Y. c 2 L •°a 4 .- EO fir.°. yvO��Y q cC~ ^�C LL0.N ~ _OC E V Y ° JOY^ �4�CYLa�W 9�N4 W yOq Ltr tYi GC Lfi A 3 L _ ppN ,0 Nauc 9 6� G �1Q E ^R G %d OY Cu9C O 9 6q r9 qt CC�NNL4=�� pcO�rq� C9 C G4CT C i�9 2 ^q "°OLr ap�.`r' d C� U4 i. N ro at�R90 � °a°Y' N�C Lp= O rL •cN>r�9 ¢=l aa.N 9 OC Y a E l l UYN °u� qV uT VOU °YNJO ° aG Y uauEi Lp .� S Y R°C.. 4r. rV p N� >YC V.E ��_ 'U L�CQC9 044 6•'i0 F•J. TIC O rnw Y'5 au C46N .V^E YL CY O9 V'q RT � H vti E. It! t N Nom. R ` IV r. ayy a aC 4t NNO R I Oi0 c 9 �Nd Na O221`]r99 OLY N 6� OC.v `uV °4 YO p.1 9L O 4 u d N S L N L Z. O 4 Lpa � v � q q °. G nORS$^iu Ly va F..-� 3L4YY R: E ?�f•. Y .+• Or 6` O .-4e� L..t+� tsit .. O I�aA O' 6wM�. d�Ea0 6 YYt L£ .•. II�.n O Tc ^ z VV •� M b i N 19 ,. /0 f V� ° `� N V N . Y RL a tL N A w NOS .� r N v° e N C ... ; N v= Zad w V ^ a u uyu c c ec2 � V ru .5WO 3 YY o L ^ a ° oa• o =a n�°. a ~^ a L C ^ p ^ q Y L ^ LL orwmi L C Y.^ i X Q YT DC.q°•> �. q Z^ Nw q 9 Nq L x P W S N aCj C Y� Y N O °°a C n .N,� N X c at v i c Da vL D `o nM� 9 0 Tu ° OI 6 «N z Y ° gn '•�N A.L. 7� O 2.•02 ♦j E r O e� O L C L °�` > -0 « O ctq'. °•� Ly> • �•r. O L k L G 9 d6 a 6 qn LL1 qq N •�.0 CC® >O•CN « C M�VC C^ C'O'O y..: V L �•^ Y 4 ° aq.N x NO o Ern ° 2 `L a. a "'^= c4'.C'3 a aa• a •v OLCC2C0 qJ [i• N L�. C. LVN O L O C a o 64 N L s 4h -o^ e. L6L �.D yN O•�q OC �y Vo D. CC `yq CW. OGO na° �• :09w L•Lr 1LLOC N 22L b d '.GY Y_ q N 4 ^c CC S9 a ��..^. vvD� ^µ L A 9 L O C at i c tq^ 29 nM� 9 H V OI 6 «N z �Y y J gn O = W U O 3 0 C 6 Y 4 nF Y O L C N O ctq'. °•� Ly> • �•r. O L k L G 9 d6 a 6 qn LL1 qq N •�.0 CC® >O•CN « C M�VC C^ V +iO L40� v '�.Ti ..°Nyu ° aq.N o Ern ° 2 `L a. a "'^= c4'.C'3 a aa• a •v OLCC2C0 qJ [i• N L�. C. LVN O L O C Nb L •� �6 V 2 •'yu C WY �L 3q v. FJa �a .°O 1' r S �• :09w L•Lr 1LLOC N •' O 019 d L Y_ q N HK �. CC S9 a ��..^. V y Q ^µ L A 9 L O .� N L L nY nc O'• N x L ... Y _^ •a •+ N �'° c° !!= .T.a 4•J� 6A qC W2 L VJU `y 10.1 • f 1 1 � N 1 � \� e• � 9 P O ° q 9 C Q C ° c 0 as t� cW q h L 9Ll y l ggyNy y^ q 9� ` Ea •Y.� V 4r •+a L.E G' d s� L C L r ° ntu.•Y• O d y O Y ✓ U d C L Y Y O y N q w C �w0. Y rC > GY LO oo.Y. o » TC oY o u. �IOi N J b �{ n r f 1 Y4 10 ' cd Of at i c tq^ 29 nM� 9 H V -.-z U.0 .L+ c w gn a ti x a, q N cL' u 6 Y 4 nF Y O L C N I d . C L .U•._L W y 5� q P a Dw t ^ % --0- G C .J Q. Q ;O G.NC uy O >O•CN « C M�VC > V +iO L40� v '�.Ti ..°Nyu €$. aq.N OLCC2C0 qJ [i• N L�. C. LVN O L O C 6C 7.CL N.Y. L •� �6 V a09W ~C P�L�y �LVL•'^ 01 C•OCE NO .C.L L4L `U �• :09w ° =L v 1LLOC N E.LO� Ei NaJu L q N O E9 n•�Y 6�• V CC S9 a ��..^. V y Q �= ac^ D ^ L �L •Zn 0 A 9 L O .� N L L nY nc O'• N x L ... Y _^ •a •+ N �'° c° !!= .T.a � NY n c u g L .� »a N O O+ •e U W � Y G w. b �{ n r f 1 Y4 10 ' cd Of i r U V 6 L Y i L Y Q 44 111 G •• OM Vr2 y > iU^ Y �Va N�'L'T Q(.3 L Y. N PCS.y N g b d L Q N Y 4 w Y Vgo.^ Cl ]��EdE ^ q V GY�r ua � C a �Vi Y LfU. C N L PN V.V. W 4J OEC7 no� ^-. L m Cuy ��.y3 = r4 oa Nn oN� V r �q4 �••."v r: O !is E � N auG'o c•oL 3 c .�• acc- °u....� N c.ui Yua 31+ o D L734J 4-.G •`fin �tGi:; NQL u ��`� u a �o � +^ aH c�nu to G4.� G es, ~ Qp 7 v�<O i•r4 -4 uNUdi O G'>L G Y •p yp u.Ea i C�L7L p�DY VW-^> `UA,' \y L� n"Y uOIV DV C� q« 016iY ru Vp D O.0 Sa. -C?l+ v u JCL > ^a ^MC q L E ��N t C Oq i ta�A C q N�Gp db `.J OtY Y6 nG «Y G1 ��1� 1911, t L N wNi i. liU41C GS• 4 � UN dAW W O•q.CC V �y A �N O 6v� E 4 W Y ,CU L Y Lan Cy Q,V Ie NFL S ltL6G .. 6q1 C I l y 6 Cp tLL6.CG 1G.a GL....11K� a K� p. 1° a Iz t CCJ RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING C�iiISSIOI APPROVING A TIAZ EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 1 171. WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time, extension for the above- described project pursuant to Section 17.02.090; and - -; -, WHEREAS, the (- 1anning Commission conditionally approved the above described Tentative Tra`.,:1 SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following�gst A. The previously approved Tentative Map is in substantial compliance with the City's Burr -;it General .Plan, Specify - Plans, Ordinances, Pl,, Codes and Policies; and, B. The extension of the Tentative Map will not cause significant inconsistencies with the current General Plan, Specfic Plans, Ordinances, Plans, Codes and Policies; and, C. The extension of the Tentative Map is not likely to cause public health and safety problems; and, D. The extension is within the time limits prescribed by state law and local ordinance. SECTION 2; The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grans a time extension fort Tract Applicant Expiration 12171 Staphenson May 26, 1987 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF MAY, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: arry T. McNiel nai man ATTEST: Brad Buller, epu y ecre ary FR 4X PLANNING COMPSSON REI$kUrION NO. TIME EXTENSION• T 1 ih, STEPHENSOti May 13, 1987. : Page 2 , I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of -the Cit, `of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resaluti.on ryas duly 4iz4— regularly, introduced, passed, and adopted, by the 01anhing ComsirQ;4n of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular .meeting of the Planning Comission held on the 13th day of stay, 1987, by the following vdter'to -wit:: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONEfiS: ll ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: L� I i i 71 �. CITY OF RANCHO CUCA TONGA ST"17 REPORT O °^ U L37 DATE: May 13, 1987 1877 w; °a TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Comnission t FRO& BrA Bull,(,r, City Planner BY: Chris Westman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: NODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -&-%03 CHRISTIAN - Aw, .1exi sing cnurc w1 n a y square TdotspRe ocated in a General Indus tri, Districts, •. on the eas= side of Archibald, south of 6r- street, in" Subarea 4, of the Industrial Specific Plan 71 47, 48. i1 I. PRWECT AND SITE DESCRIPTIO.!'y� A. Action Req66so d. Approval of a modification to a Conditional use Permit. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: or zn - multi-renant Indus rial, Subarea 4 South - Multi- tenant industrial, Subarea 4 East - Vacant, Subarea 16 West - Multi-tenant. industrial, 5ksarea 4 C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - enera f3ustrial North General Industrial South - General Industrial East - General Industrial West - Industrial Park D. Site Characteristics: The site is an existing fully improved sou i- enan i n s r al park. E. Number of Number of Type Square parking .Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Church 1,200 1/35 34 34+ j i ITEM D a P-s✓ PLANNING COMMISS1014 STAFF REPORT CUP 85 -03 - Christian Family Fellowship May 13, 1987 Page 2 II. BACKGROUND: Conditional Use Permit 85 -03 was originally approved arc 73-,71985. As, a condition of approval it was required to provide a two -year review for compliance with the conditions of approvals As a part of that review it was determined that the church had not fully complied with the Conditions of Approval and the church was required to apply for a modification to the original Conditional Use Permit, During the past two -year period, the Christian Family Fellowship has changed their name to Rancho Evangelical Free Church and has expanded their - square footage to include the adjacent lease Space to the west and to the east. This increased the square footage of j the church to three times the approved size. In addition, a second church, the Orangewood Baptist, has occupied part of the west space of the Christian Family Fellowship. Code Enforcement has been in touch with Christian Family Fellowship and Orangewood Baptist requesting that both churches get the appropriate approvals foo operation. The appiicatit has stated th .' *- they will be moving from this location by July and has, in fact,,.Hled for a Conditional Use Permit (see CUP 87 -03 on this agenda) for another location. III. ANALYSIS: The church's non - conformance with the conditions of approva can be summarized in three major points: 1. That the church expanded to three times the originally approved size; 2. Building permits were not issued for interior alterations; and 3. Compliance with Fire District regulations was never satisfied. Although the church- expanded its gross floor area, tt* sanctuary seating area remained the original size. Religious assembly parking requirements are based upon sanctuary seating area, therefore parking requirements remain the sane. However, Building and Fire Codes had not been complied with and, in fact, certain work was performed without required penC ts. Pastor Hindley stated at the February 25th Planning Commission meeting that because of the expense and their intentions to move, they were reluctant to comply with Building and Fire regulations at this location. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The proposed project is generally consistent with e Indu-sl-RWT Specific Plan and the intent of the General Plan and Development Code, however, non - conformance with Building and Fire Codes could be detrimental to the public health and safety and could be materially injurious to properties in the vicinity. a P-s✓ PLANNI,NO. COW4�iiSSION STAFF REPORT CUP '85-03 � Chrtstian Family Fellcxship May 13, 2987 �I Page 3 jo �. f, V. CORRCsPt�►Or'FK,. This item has been advertised as a public hearing in 7W-45 -Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. VI. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recomends that the Planning Commission deny rie NOGIrIcatibn to Conditional Use Permit 85 -03 and revoke the approval of the original Conditional Use Permit effective May 31, 1987. Rosp ctfull omitted, ----- §a i idler >; Ct Planner 88:CW:ns \� Attachments: Exhibit "A" Vicin4�l,Y Map _ P. Ethibit °8" - Site k*� Exhibit "C" - Floor Plan Resoiution of Denial f KI R. NDRTH CITY 0 RANCHO CUCA A PLANNING D', U ?� f 1 „q � � wya►�P � ��, — pla.SitY two F i t � 1 20 -imam V NORTH CITY OF ITE\ t: RANCHO CLrCAI-V10NGA `r(TI.E :._ StTE PL PLANNING DIN'ISI(),N EKHIf3fi': � rf3' t ✓s Y-- ra' — � ►'F1tn+AR}r � Z � lVi.cxtrzr 7� Frr r. (2va FTC) v ! YLI�Ir- I fF /7 t (MAY /CLVI�12, W Z o ae_F vr�racu c 0 MTL ?!- PCIc."t Room J . �O / Cr2 °.v fr'� (. nr OCLVP�frrrW<sJ GS�y syr::t -i ?9 7 - .�. I 45 e 1j 603 j{EC;PriF�r. _ wossph' flOS sTy 7n6CgA l� �; iw cY PIM1=rIKS _. _ ._.. jjj ^.-- t— l-- t.,a— y.�.•.__ _._ -_... ..- ... _ .. iC'._ `z. f _.• �� P4A.TFORM �.. (22 f fr') rzr - - is' • � zF. � � � . NvRlERY _ _ _ TiKy TFTl .. ... INNftl •- oc s' - (a -17z _. ,: it i- = %z� _. -� ... .- .�C2lifj'.PR!_krm•)_ _4$ ( /92Fr °12rF0 tc VRRexrLY wOR tBrP AkJA io v� (,,,, qY err v/ ?�.. _ FOR O.iiKN�iWFFi L /P'S- }• T: t/^ AY OrLVIr /CLIIIM1Yt1= ZS) t% • " 4 • �19 Of Fla r . w . �L-•! tf. - -ar. ' - .. SC•JC.r� ? 5 4• V � CI°'Y Of. rte^ RAI` CHO CUC'AIYi .' A Tt ru. ` rt.tvtNG QtvttvcHtMr =...Let.._ RESOLUTION NO. ;A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CkAMOMGA PLANNING COMISSION DENYING A REQUEST FOR THE APPROVAL OF; A rDWICATION ",F0 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 85 -03, Mr/ REVOKING SAW, FOR AN EXISTING CHURCH WITHIN A 1,650 S , FT. SPACE 'LOCATED IN A GENERAL - INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT ON -,THE EAST SIDE' OF ARCHIBALD, SOUTH & 6TH STREET, IN SUBAREA' 4 OF THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN ANU MAKING FINDINGS AND SUPPORT THEREOF - APN .210_ 471, -47, 48. A. RECITALS (i) WHEREAS, on. March 13, 1985, Christian Family Fellowa4ifip was granted a Conditional Use Permit with a condition of review after a two -year P eriod, for compliance with cgck�itians of approval. IN (ii) WHEREAS, on February 25,4 987, 987 , the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and a two-year review for compliance with the Conditions of Approa.:l as containrjd in Resolution No. 85 -35. (ii'i) WHEREAS, it was determined that the church had expanded to three' 1 ( times the originally approved size, and that conditions requiring building permits and ^^mpliance with Fire. District regulations had not been completely satisfied. f (iv) WHEREAS, on � Aprii 1, 1957, Christian Family Fellowship filed an application for the modification to a,q existing Conditional Use Permit described above in the title of thi�,Res >lution. (v) WHEREAS, Christian Family Fellowship has submitted an application to the City as Rancho Evangelical Free Church for a Conditional Use Permit at another location with the intention to move from theiv r nt location at 9376 Archbald, suite 602 -604, therefore, had not satse present building and Fire Marshall regulations. B. RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined, and resolveu by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission finds that all of the facts set forth in Oe Recitals, Part A of this Resolution, are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented, including writtery staff reports, this Commissiod hereby specifically finds as follows. a. That the Conditional Use Permit is not being corr�Ucted in an appropriate manner and that modifications are not available to mitigate the impacts. ` Resolution No. CUP 85 -03 -T Page Z AOL a =- b. That the applicant has not complied with all applicahl e Codes and Regulations. c. That the proposed use will be detrimental to the public health, safety, welfare, or materialSy injurious IIa p•operties or improvements in the vicinity. f' f d. That the prop ised use does not comply with eacw of the �- T pplica,_e provisions of the Development Code. 3.. Based upsri the Findings and Conclusidns, this,�Commission hereby denies Modification to Conditional Use Permit 85 -03. d. based upon the Findings. and Conclusions, this Commission P hereby revokes Conditional Use Permit and requires the church �.a operation to cease and'desist no lcter than May 31, 1987. S. The Deputy Se^retary to this Commission will certify to ' adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS -13TH DAY OF MAY, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: arry . c ie , ' airman ATTEST: ra u er, Deputy secretary I Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning 'Commission of the City of Yancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Coamission held on the 13th day of May, 1987y by the following Vote -to -wit: AYES: COWISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: E, 3- � a� i W CITY OF RANCHO CUCANiONGA c��o STAFF REPORT C F Z - y DATE: May 13, 1987 v TO: Chairman,,and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad S..tller, City Planner BY: Chris West-pan, Assistant Planner y SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -03 - RAMHO 6ANGELICAL FREE A,proposal to locate a c urcn wi firm an: ex1s M- _ ; 2,395 square foot professional'buiiding,,.Tocated at 89 f Archibald within the General Industrial District (Subarea 4) - APN 209- 171 -155. I. PROJECT A,1O SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Regeested: Approval of a Conditional UsOl, Permitll`/ B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: irortfi 51 ng I a fami I y res en gal, Subarea 4 South - Multi- tenant industrial, Subarea 4 East - Siygli family residential, Subarea 4 West - Industrial, Subarea 4 C. General Plan Designations: 'Project site eneral Ind ustrial North - General Industrial South G%reral Industrial East - General Industrial West General Industrial D. Site Characteristics: The site is a fully developed professional center. E. Parking Calculations: Number of homer of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provide Church 1,570 1/35 45 53 ITEM f i w Via•. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 87 -03 - RANCHO EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH May 13, 1987 Page 2 .a II. BACKGROUND: The Nilvow professional Center was originally approved as on anal Use 'hermit 92 -19 with a blanket provision to allow certain uses including, administrative and office, personal service, and professional services and all other permitted u�, #es for Subarea 4. Religious, assembly was not origina ?,,;_ !3cluded-in the blanket provision and-therefore requires a separate Conditional Use Permit. III. ANALYSIS: The applicant proposes a sanctuary, classrooms and c urc offices. The tenant -list provided indicates that all present tenants primarily operate during the normal business hours, 8 am to 6 pm, Monday - Friday with the exception of the Victory Baptist Church which operates on Sundays. Rancho Evangelical also proposes to operate on Sundays, and on some evenings after normal business hours. Parking requirements zre based upon sanctuary seating area for religious assembly. Rancho Evangelical. has a 1,570 square foot seating area. At 1 space per 35 square feet, a total of 45 parking spaces are required. The total parking required for both churches is 74 and the total parking available on Sunday is 91. Therefore, if .there are not any other businesses that require parking during the church's operation times, the available parking will be sufficient. At this time, Victory Baptist's lease has not been renewed and will expire June 30, 1987. The applicant has submitted plans tG the Foothill Fire District which have been preliminarily approved for this location. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Tine proposed use is consistent ulith the General an and the Industrial Specific Plan. - The proposed use, together with the recommended conditions of approval, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the area. V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing In ie a, y eport Newspaper, the property posted,, and notices sent7o -a proper y owners within 300 feet of the p;•,)ject. VI. RECOtMSENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve onoi -ional Use Permit 87 -03 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions. PLANNING .0 S „SI,CN ' STAFF REPORT CUP 87 -03 RANCRb EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH May 13, 1987 page 3 ,J Respectful lr su i ttg4 Brad Bui ere City Planner BB CW:to Attachments; letter of Intent ,£xhi -bi t "A” - Location Map Exhibit "8" _ Site Pln Exhibit "C" — Floor Plans Exhibit "U" - Tet;ant List Resolution of Approval with Conditions .`, 3 1L ! RANCHO EVANGELICAL FR" EE 'CHURCH t "A Christian,Family Feilowship- r' >, 'arch 11, 1987 PASTOf: >` To Whom it May Concern: P 4 r Forrest Hindley SUBJECT: CUP Bryce flilhngsley Coneern.ing our. propoaed r into nto Suite6 300, 410, 8 440 Georg &Bait the 'W ttowa P,*..o6eazionat Center, heated at 8468 Archi,batd, < <: re,`i.ntend to ut.Lti.ze the dac ti&ez a& a church, with. pu'�,° a a6eembey ' Marshall f. erson on weekends and /or weekn4ht6, out6ide o6 nonmat bu,a.ine6a opetating E` '? hawed in the 6aci ity. Add �ionafty, we watt maintaZn a chwtch 1 Dave Morgan o66ice in Suite 410 duung: r6Amat bua.cnesa howA. T .ice ,:pose b.te we couCd have some day4,cme U e Studies, amatt meetings, on aitex- acho&t ekitdren "a ,activ.ite6, not, nequiAing many can6 (antic Dated maximum= ?5 cars.; The Vest number o6 peopte we cou.td neasonab; y .neat in our 6anctuaky wou.td be 200. -� -the paeaent time b we onty have one pai! woxkex in our church- the pa.3- i. We e-outd cone ivab.ty add anotheA pastor, a mue-.a d. tectot, and a paid . 6 6ecft -etaky whUe, in this .toeation. Canrentty, we have vo:tunte-viz ' covering the aeene#aniat reapona ebtti,t ee. We are moving 61tom our present .tocatton in the Archicenter, 4 -- on the eoutheaat connen o6 Anehiba d and 6th St:ceets, due to the .inadequacy q ths6e present 6ae.iUUea to be brought up to the apptopkiate codes, can need to .inst..att adequate a A. conditioning, and the deztke. Son etnee 6ront ,tocatZon, whete we need not have a tenpouAy 64n ott 6Unt each Sunday. VUA new $acuity CVZU provide +atmoa.t twice the seating capacity o6 our. pncaent.tocation. We witt be mait,ing 4pp.Ucatton to modti6y the =&ent e.egn,ing pnovia.ion jar THE WILLOWS to mow -bon a .6ign on the Audito&ium bu.itding, atati:ng RARCHO ESIA.`dGELZCAL FREE CHURCH. Thank You bon yews consideration. S.cnc ety, Forne6t H.cndtey <� Patton i 9375 AsOhibu 1 Avanue 41603, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (714) 989.8553 i • a 141aj� • 4 1 //�� it ` � • 9Y. aS y Ltl 1 �.7 1 .701 FET =►SA: AI/L. 241 Ac Wt, I2Sl ACHA Par 7 1 _ • �Al'1 406AC Per 2 { l AZ' PSI IUAC 1 Par S 7 AC ft's Pat 7 _ MAC MAC _ 40AC - 1.6014 O�2 Par.4 k Par 3 1 err � (sel 1 1 r]AC .G � r ¢ 1 a . `.. STREET` . -V 1 i NOR CITY of n r 3 RANCHO CUCArvioNGA -. m, � 67 -0kM �7 4 t K . n 1 �} Ac. - at- c { (�G. ..� �P/s:X.ITE [,Rxr _ ti s� I • � ,ti ,. •-- • "f' � �Ti.A007L tt. \\ •'y„r f Y•l� \ \.� li��^ .LANKA --L,� k .r,..._ �. �ylsl +n? tln+t 3[7.4` I(Q • II YS' ' . cr ..... CITY Of. rrEms F 67 -05 y RANCHO CUCAI&i Tom, �j � 15 36' i Cr +�frSN Pt�YFDR.a6. � gatg7r GNgfRS � �i i w a (,waxes M.PZ -2i61 w CMEnt S t: .e'.5 / Nu�litrt e s � C++wJ �� .Fis JNY 7n7 S Lo -= <'i • c,+rRw:�, � , cRrEa*.K . � +'la. - 2li r CITY Or. Pr,FSEhql TEkAN -aLILATTON SUITE 100 CREATIVE PERSOPMEL SiOO-6:00 Weekday,4 SUITE 110 ALT-NE COUNSELING SERVICES 9:00 :�ILA weekdap, '50me evenin96 SUiTE T30 A L WILLIAMS 8.00-6.00 Weehday4, Aome eveninga SUITE 200 VICTiORY SAMST' CHURCU Sundau AM Sejb�,'Ecu, zome2eveningz ��rIVCF soutatagAv Size= 1,000 dt SUITE 400 CDT TEMPORARV SERVICES 8:00-6:00 Weekday.6 SUITE 420 NArJ. ASSOCIATES 8;00-6:00 Weeikdap SUITE 430 A.J. BRAM,7r CONST, 8:00-6*00 Wekday-6 SUITE 500 CHILVRENIS WORLD 1.00-6.00 WeekdayA RESOLUTION NO. ' A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING ;:OMMt,SSIbN APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 87 -03 FOR RANCHO` EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH LOCATED AT 8968 ARCHIBALD AVENUE IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS,: on tine 8th day of April, 1487, a complete application was filed by Rancho Evangelical Free Church for review of the above- described project; and WHEREAS, on the 13th day of May, 1987, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission yield a public hearing to consider the above - described project, NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met' 1. That the proposed use is;iim accord with the General Plan, 0,-, objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes o the ti;.ytrirt in Which the site is located. 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.. t.. 3. That the proposed use complies ";d th each of the applicable provisions or the DeveiGpment Code. SECTION 2: That Conditional Use Permit No. 87 -03 is approved subject t—o-Effe—fo-TTowing conditions: - 1. Apr-oval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Industrial Specific Plan, all other applicable City Ordinances. 2. All signs propa,ed for this Conditional Use Permit shall be desi31:1ed in conformance with the %ity's Sign Ordinance and the approvpi Uniform Sign Program for the Willows and Sh;.ii regp re review and approvJ by the Punning livision prior to instal 'iation. 3. If the operatinn of this Conditional use Permit causes adkrse effects to neighboring businesses, tt-- Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for their review and possible termination of the use. Pj.ANRING COMMISSION RESOLUTION( NO. `l s CUP �7 -03 - RANCHO EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH _ 9-ay 13, 1987" Page 2 4. The building shall not be occupied, except for church office activity, until Completion of all improvements' required by Building and Fire Codes to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division and Foothill Fire Protection District. Prior to occupancy, plans shall' be submitted to tha Focuhill ')strict Fire Protection and the Building and Safety Divis %q to shm compli, -ince. The building shall be - inspecl,ad for 0m9liance prissy to occupancy. 5. The building may be used for religious ass(',i.�ly and other large group (5Ot persons) activitiea�, only on r, Saturdays a,-.d Su days and after 6:00,-; p.m. on weeknights. 6. Preschoals or schools are nut allowed by this permit;,\ however, this shall not preclude nurseries or Sundd�y School during the hours of religious or ; group as��eiy. APPROL) AND PTED THIS 1a"TH DAY Of MAY, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY Oi_PANCHO Cu�AMiop;a BY: Larry T. McNiei, a rman ATTEST: Brad Duller, Depqty ecre u:;- \, I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of OR Planning ''avmission of the City of Rancho Curznsonga, do hereby certify that the foragoitS Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adapted by the .Planning COWAission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of th!* Planning Commission Feld on the 13th day of May, 1987, by theY"ol ?owing vote -td -wit. AYES: 'COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: tr L 2 DATE*. TO* h_N: BY: pillow pump—, ITy OF, RtNCI1O CUO"ONGA" -------------- STAFF IPOtE RT ,4ay 13,11987 C,hE, of the Plan.ling Com issioll irmau Members ellb Bradbuller, Pity Planner, Scott Murony, Assis t ant Planner 11 13440 r SUBJECT* ----joj in Low- vmm TY M17 In SAPOI family ns units i;:� I - �,- i itz �al nist�lct (4-8 , ' �oelli n MCdj um Density . Residential ;`tanned Community -1 '-- on ca tad with-in tae victoria -- per acre) enue, northeast of Kenyon side of 109h1rnd All the South Way - APR 227-oil-67. PROJECT AND SITE OZScR',PTI6H' 1 subdivisi011 IMP, conceptual Action Requesced: I Approva issuance of A. aptual landscaping V�,(Ekn, aq4 k,gative Declaration- I irg units pi-, acre, B. ?roject Density: dwel-I L=� Sur,•ounding Land Use and Zoning: Tt��;��aj—jjy residan*.ial; Low-Medium fl"Eli��k units per acre) Density Residential (4--q dWellifIg ling South - Vacant; Low - Medium DensitY Residential (4-8 dwelling units per VW'R) j),,,,,sjty Residential (4-0 t`wall'ng East - Vacant, Low-Mi'U%7-P units, ;er acre) -8 dwelling West - Vacant; Medium Densi ty Residential (4 units per acre) and school. D. General PI 'An DESiQtia�c"Ons: ensity qesidentil (4-8 dwelling "' r 'E ___6 roe —e �_t_ T _�- e I units per aW Residential (4-8 dw(,Jling units Nor - Low-Medium Derisity per acre? i V Resildnt'lal 1%4-8 dwelling units South - LOW - Medium Density per acre) tv Residential J4_8 dwelliII9 units East - Low-Medium Der.-Si per acre) I +)L Residential (4-8 dwelling units Low-Medium Dens per acre) ` ( PLANNING COF�h5:IQN $�#F REPORT k �� TT 13440 WILLIAM LYON COMPANY _. 1 ' May 13;, 1987,E Page 2 p P_4 < Ea` Site Characteristics: The site is current) vacant with a 3 to 41 :bpe wsvr nor th to south. The project will be i&anded;by 1 tiigilland Avenue to the north, iCet +yon Wa,� to, hA.,! outh ar,&west, - `. Cast Entry Road to the south, dnd undevelt k! land outside the -toria Planned Community to the east. IT. BACKGROUND: On Oecetr,�er 10, 19368 the. Planning Coaka;ssion approved h ne rea , evelnpxnent Plan for the Vineyards North Plainni.�g Area. the Area Develt� ent Plan established the land use designations and specific road aligmmits. Subsegdently, the Planning Corr:4 �a approved Tentative Tract 13279 (The "super block" tra;t) dividing -. the Vineyards North.,into _1Q smaller planning areas and dedicating rigNtrof -way for arterial ann 661 lector roads. I11. AW.YZIS., F' A. PAneral The applicant is proppsi ng to develop 111 �i ngl a ,am y ota: ranging in size from 6,100 square fe=t in area to i4,807 square) feet -.in area velth An average lot size of 6,911; square feet !n area. Tne applicant U, only proposing tb`. subdivide this priaperty,, grade the. site, and install the i of ea!,.tructuit at tills time. ' 1he "padded" 1 ots wi th then be sold to another devel;nNer. The design review of the product type will be reviewe, aad approved at a later Ate by the Planning Commission, i - Vi B. Deign Review Committee: At the meeting of April ?_, 1987, the""' I app can prov a revised glens incorporatii:g the realignment of the East Entry Road to acco odate a future high school' site. Tile Design- Review Committee (Tolstoy, Emorrck, and j Buller) reviewed the revised plans and to nded approval of - 1 the project subject to the following' c.yn'ditions: I 1. The norto- puth street adjacent to, and parallel tray the tracts east perimeter should be realigned to 1 provide a curvilinear aasign to " eak up the Tgng I, straight length. 2. Provide a fencing plan showinx the location of "all tract fencing (perimeter and property) fDr the review and approval of the Plani ng Cowis:.7oa. r - z PLANNING COMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 15440 - WILLIAM LxON COMPAV{ ' May 13, 1987 Page 3 3. RQNise the product prototype plan to show the revised 4` lot configurations as a result of the realigr-iaent of east Entry Road.' This plan should show house plotting on lots on the southern portion of the tract u adjacent to Kenyon Way and Eart Entry Road. Of pdrticular concern is how units will be plotted on flag and unusually shaped lots. 4 Plans of the revised design nhow�ng a nevi alignment of East Entry Road are to be submitted for the review and approval of the Tecnnical and Grading Committees prior to scheduling for review by the Planning Commission. The applicant has submitted revised plans incorporating tkR ,�erommendations s0 the Design Re,-Mew Committee fo. 7 review and consideration by the Piannieg Commission. The revisions are shown on Exhibits "R ", "C ".':and "0 ", C. Tec3ni'caT Review .Committee: The Victoria Ccnmu0 ty Plan FeQui res a`r`ecrea iona ve cie storage be provide for 25% of Vn; lots. This can be accomplished through space on individual iots or through construction of- a desiopated storago area elsedhere within the Victoria P14 coed Community. A typical unit plotting provided by the applicant indicates that the residences will be center p of with large enough side. yards (10 foot minimums to &.1cgAmodate the storage of smaller rec,:-eational vehicles. The Technical Review Comraittee has also rq '.;ed the revised plans for Tentative Traces 13440 incorporai:z,_y the realignment of East Entry Road and has recommanded their approval. D. Environmental Assessment: Part I of Ini,ial Study his been complete by t app can Staff has comrleted Part 1l of the Environmental Checklist and found no signMizant impacts on the environment as a result of the proposal. If the Planning Commission concurs with these findings, then Issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Thi`; project is consistent with the Victoria Planned Comr�u" ni,y and the General Plan. The project will not 5e detrimetital to adjacent properties or cause significant environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed, use, together with the recon3ended condition,, of approval, is in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Victoria Planned Community, the Development Code and City Standards._ )1'— ; PLANNI=NG COWrs ION S?AFi' REPORT TT 13446- W111JAM LYON COMPANY w f 13 1987 Page 4 i V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been adverti3ed in The Daily Report i '. n�lwspaper as a .public hearing and notice'o were sent to a k properties., owners within 300 feet of the prQect :si!V, Vt.. RECOMMENUATIGN Staff recommends' that the Plaianing , Commission approval ep a.ive ''rnct 13440 through,adopiion of the attached Resolution with conditions and issue a negative Declaration.. Re.ryectfully submitted Brad 8 l er City Planner B8: SM,. sgr - Attachments: Exhibit "•A" - Locatio4`Map Exhibit "0 - rentative`Tract Map k;. Exhibit "Cu ;pnceptual/ product Type Exhibit "D" - 6nceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "E" - Conceptual Nradi% Plan Resolution of Approval with Conditions F v '�" � � _ X11. - ✓� mom Sol Ir TENTATflE rAACT i9440 -LOT KMNUAAY as WMI 4Q.L Ilifmue n. ;. JQj,�. v[M6R.t�'S� �31tNG:RA N. i tij l �i Ii •:A t• �- - y.H H f =r j. it N Y X i l Y. 1fi N i �f \ N t f:N H I,M 14 '• �� pIYNLMLi[ S fi. R- r • M a:Wnii¢[asi praO. R. � � IYUttt FYAit I I,i N -R it ti i f , �I KOR" l CITY Qr, ITENIL PW4N Nr, DIM - - t` 0 F -d N l UCLLI Z. :Q Q ON . W >U s ►��lf RANCHO ! t ♦ i PLANNNG DTVISKYN EXHIBM i I b,e x. r I V CITY OF ITEM- _ R.��.ir;C HO C`UCr�'�IC }NGA —„cam. TtTt�= PLANNING X?N " I - E• t- ;tt�r<' �= SCALE- A Ask (Esi - �" A 1 � r �� }. a � �`:r`\ WSJ• � �� - — I p . fe'✓C. � ! r r r fry Y,�..• -�'� (!j{p J �`.� � \ -i a, yt r CITY OF rrElt: -.fir- / - /� TCYi CLTC.kI IONCirA, TITLE: C � P LA, Mi1I \G Iii' / -� E�Htt?ti'SCALE E Mt i ]]� ' ra n n r n. a ry I 4a3� ell) Ct ius ------------ 'a v. r ES) Imo: ('s a Is t IE e® j 'xs � r t 1 ate, T N CITY OF ULM. _ T( Ci CAdMO. N*GA +ryam} E PLANNIiNU E�CHiBiT: , = �eeS�G F^s: F ,1� /p -9,9.: SCA LE- f S•gii{ ri 47, I $= p 4 F RANCH VUFwA4QNR.iATrfut DRnSW y RESOLUTION NO. r A `RESOLUTIOW OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY bF`° r„ RANLVO CUCAMOyG.A, CALIFORNIA, CJNOITIONA11Y APPR0VIW3 TENTA, IVIE TWI MAP NO.. 13440 WHEREAS, Tentative, Tract Map No. 13440, hereinafter "Map" Submitted by The William Lyon Company, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated �h the City of `Rancho fbcamonga,; County of Sari Bernard no, State of California, described as a residentiai.tract subdivision . fi of 24 a�kres:zf land into 111 single 'family lots located n -:;the south side of Highland ,Nvenue, northeast of Kenyon Way (APN 227 -011 �') regularly came R' before the Manning Commission for public hearinN and acti�,,i an May 13, 1418-7; :nd WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended appu ^oval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engin(�erina and Planning Division's reports- and " WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning 0ivisiop's reports and has gnsidered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows;, SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to 7enta ve Tract No. 13440 and the .Map thereof: 'a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Devolopment Code, and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development, Code, and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development propo3ed! (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public: at large, now of record, for access through or use cf the property within the proposer subdivision. PLANNING C($1NISSION RESOLUTION X3. ,. T 13440 - THE WILLIAM LYON COMPANY Mal: 13, 1987 Page 2 MEN VINCI 1"' (g) That this project will not create adverse impact!gr on the environment and a Negative Ceclaratior, is issued. attached SECTIOW- 2 her e approved ve Tract Flap No. 13440, a Copy of whi rO ii subject to a'I of the fvlIowing conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: Planning Division: 1. Prior to recordation of Tract 1,3 0, the final map for Tract'1 ?179 shall be recorded. 2. All pertinent conditions for Tract 13279, as contained in Resolutiaa 87 -40, shall apply. 3. This map is being approved as a Tract Subdivision only Any f):ture proposals for tffee' Tv Ti►pmen o five or more residential units shall req6*4 Design Review approval prior_ to the issuance of Guilding permits for any units. - 4. The William Lyon Company shall submit a disclosure statement for thi�.tract to be r0iewed arid approved by the City Pldnner prior. to distraibution to perspective developers of this tract. li? disclosure statement shall include the City of Rancnc Cucamonga 's conditions, requirements, and expectations for develoom,_nt standards and product types. for this tract. Any application for Design Review of this tract shall be acrompanied by a copy of the approved disclosure stytemen' gned by the developer. _1- Landscape treatments at the end of the side -on cul- de -sacs shall be designed to provide an open view Onto the interior of the cui -(e -sac. 6. The fencing /walls required %r the tract shall be consistent with the fencing/wal'i indicated on the conceptua landscaping plan. Wcod fencing exposed to public view shall be treated with stain, paint or water sealant. Fencing on corner sich� yards and fencing along Xen��n Way, and "re East Entry Road shall be decorative block. 7. Prior to oonupancy of more than 50 percent of the units within the tract, the pe;?estrian trails shall be improved girth sidewalks, landscaping, it *igation, � j and low level l i ,hti n j. The jil ans are to be revie"d and approved by tk_ City Planner and City Engind..)r prior to the issuance of building permits. Cl ter, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. Ti 13440 - THE WILLIAM LYON COMPANY Nay 13, 1987 Page 3 8. Any retaining, walls used are to be a maximum of 4 feet high. 9. All -retaining walls visible to the ane-ral -public, on true weet side of corner side yards and within the front yard, -ire 'ta,be constructed of a decorlitive material to the satisfaction of the City Plannem, 10. All back of - 7, at grade-. differentials are to be a maximum of 12 feet. Engineering Division: 1. All pertinent conditions Of Tract 13279 shall apply. 2. City maintained slopes steeper than 3 to 1 shall not exceed 12' fn height. 3. Notice of intention to form ani;ibr Join the Lighting and Landscaping District- "shall be filed with the City Council prior to recordation of the map o r�' issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. 4. the developer shall pay the pro rat fee for future undergrounding 0, q,�&head uVUt16,_K' along Highland Avenue, as conG4V ted with Tentatf,!�Y, Tract 13279, prior to recordatful, S. The trails to be maintained by the City she0 be constructed and dedicateClull width incorporating a separation device such as a wall or curb to define the limits to be maintained by the City. 6 The alignment of the East Entry Road from Kenyon Vay to the east tract boundary shall he resolved prior to recordation of the final map as approved 'by the City Engineer as follows: a. It shall be realigned so that its south right-of-way line intersects the west property line of the easterly ad�4cent prr.perty at a point .401 south the .,Gf north line of the south 20 acres :-If sai4__ adjacent :property (APN V7-011-08); •)r � 1 PLANNING COW SSTCN AE'S'=}i UTIQN NO. TT 13440 - THE WILLIAM LYON COMPANY o- May 13, 1987 Page 4 b, It may be aligned as proposed subJect to the developer obtaining offers, ' of fledication for the portign from the easterly tract boundary to Rochester Avenue (a minimum of 4Q' in width) on an `;. alignment approved by the City Engineer and the execution of a three party `• agreement between the property owners to E the east, the developer, and the City. i APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF MAY, 1987. f PLANNING COMMISSION OF THZ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA €. BY: airy Ie , a man - ATTEST: * Brad Buller, Ueputy Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Cowmfssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly intr Ji;ced, passed, and adopted by ivc Planning ConmisFion of the City of Rancho �xP. °awnga, at a regular meeting of the Planning ComeAssion held on the 13th day, of May, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: :' JMMI5'!ONERSt ' NOES: !XMISS1ONERS: 1 k ASSENT: Ca;:6USS1JNERS: .r 1 Q .Z a i d �� ll, w `c 0w c npY �u✓ G y i oae` Lg ry °sg iF �ti3 w i Pic 6gY.+ tee =aWg a`cls- y 5. b2? a gg »Y $ _�''•.e " E ay N`oa fin.� O1 "g, ;j_; Y,. amp °1:. cow 'O >IS" Z.; a rY$ 'a f I »r 0.81 all, It's ra L`feyaatl u�`C� �� MY4 ^G�� 0g6wa Y V 1 F. �s F O M� O $vat h V i YOM 1 ja`� w 2 Q S 1y � C •r YY N O �a$ `o o ns 66660 y.. �i � yc•e � 6 a gr w��.Y.YY. r� N� 14I f M� O • ,y �� 1 9w:Q .1 T `AcN •tom M.�G L -aL awpO N : q GfwY. y1R /+�, Ge ��_ S•O'~ �VC. y� C_ ^�! � <.�liy. -`R C v dpwE�N=ydj -QL w C i Y -20 M p Il pf , pwAU u - y a YOM Z., �yO ..N p � O• a w 1 0 C ` OI e Y Ar VY O a A q`I` L C V H > y u y S O Gpp 0 .. .. 133:; e�? oY Lw GSt 9M O s O N�a �guV Mw Ma �•�OO? pLy NY V ;w� Y -1V- Aw 4 L M L O Y Q N 6M Y k �1 Y.N pN �. Yp O YNwL Va Nei aL %� 4AG�Y.`.- jQY s N 'J <!. aouLLLga Goya ryry •�LL- (��L�.N. °'$ vYo„L, °G"w. �C rw••..uc. ✓ ua $a �'r. .Q CYCN ppY�YL P�P�O �L� VYYr9rwy� 9 ayy, a N> 4^ 1 a i• a Y Y N N L! L iwLi •y O- L 6 uaO�N y` fa YY-p • p Y.q it L ■yr, L� +e��VVCwC YyYU;6O N�� NyeiS�Y ^- CV Y Yb 0g -��yd A �Y.,O1i�71�p T YO..N �..� O�1w vO.Y �a at LO. na ..V LM -PS IO4Y y\•.Ys4 iC� -� gO~„ as G` tlC :Jl L q G.� O �• Y N 8L P v °� _»'$ 2Sf�� p'YygY�C !;yA1d~ �JQ �Y1Q�� CSi�M `�gY�LSy.Dq= G(�. L: AY O.N yE 1Ap� I T �6 Sa Y �qC 9Y Y a `Y a �u <�r6 CP Yr �YMNYm DN VM LJ M1 d N Yam c a p v �.w. eve .�� S y,- -y�.�t Qar -�.` o•,t,�os `a o� Nn •tee n6 «gt w,� 0 g^4-��w Yom` Fh ai•Y'gS C•pi - y- ■y,,.. C.N..�� u C� a : N-�i �Y,�6LayC « -�1 �44. V V +O rguy vae �C .L.t°wS`••b Ca ...+oA iY aYia{ M Y - S p L 221 Zb „e +g yY vMx' -a' - 2�u .e °uu_ $1 N M N •` Y y C }. N g O r YY N uM W p V d° C S Y igp� �NIr ri WL M, G"�y Y -1 gig �C O4w In cry Li Le YEiS YE �. a^ e� °gv�� gG= =r yySa PGNN N6 L_J CONce -104. G Y3� +i nC.L N'�C ^vCgyN4 + -CCaAC Y C 0 G. yr V 9 S t -v- --.= V- °w i�u eL i'71 3Oi L «� Zt �eyo�s •Y 8-v. aAi rAa x e �= s, $s v a�•�� q$. �v•L, «L$$ � N o 5.."=' «n, A CY Yy YOM C!!O��U7 Y9 ^Y C eYy'N 0�G CC O GZp y..g 4 pwC Y' OA'. LAgN TYGC Vb,Y -04. r¢YU.0 OW- O+YtC>��y 0&2AO� p 6yy`.` L Yp y`V Y N Y V p 0. y <70G0 �.M6 a:N° <' MO N19 zY �O6Y9MMl .a.iY•piYN .. wi N6y =�S «4 Irl-' i1 n n OCR ��" 0V at=e w PY Ili. 00000 �wy LC Ci' C COOL 7Y p G y e �0� -�' �4 Nd +Y `l N m4 e.0 �tiv30 V a G O ^mod.= L CUVtT N x O Y y G c M >• r P.r, ' YNg Q v G• h Y +� w0 P O a M O = O L PD .aN QCy .oa}u a -LL °�•r�. o e NLy w` � ��o o r.+Y iOYN i SY Y3iii Z°sru gG �. O �r s waee �' Y.p �e�Yy4Y N1G eL,.^ w ± ^ O i• C at rN , e�YC. gg ` cis � V Otn y = iL 4Hy ..Y.^ O N u av V a�oQO V d'=' w L�a',C r&u r�r •,�,� ov$ 4 n t c w � a�. • 1�i °^wi Win.. =� O d P. yaLO. Nx� 4o a+45 a° o4L "'A U�nE �$v n� oy go.°.w ^rQ O1Se iVV.� N� .`�. Yf`NNbX O1Y N.yY �'C;yCCVy it tF'0��. C' 69 GZc at^ y� r O •trfi 06eC pt Y.G V a �Q 6 u 6�1 ` y 3 IOM C �r` iV r6M b ' Y eb` Y46r �YLaOtl =C�!Y N. C�C �.�VC� roc C�q+ aV `FC* L� CYN`ge LiY� �0� nl Y V4V O O ±� I O r Tl Q qN pSyk> Ia° C o Z u yywN CVO 64e4 w'r c� }V.Ntldtl Yf2 L`^Ma_i.yyY�O`Y i y ft tlyyi 0 g�IICYYcOm eCC CV PO wr'. ■`� ®YfL� pa ACt`�yyS V '�C` Sys �0. OLiC ISNONf.4� N�� r !•.. �� t� � 4� Y M ut1N. •. NZ .YOi r� YtT ^'O C Cwr e L s cz Y O .i. r Q r Y 3 = on v 7. _3 0 d^ ^40 w p 1p. 8 31.v a 6 rY 6 n oiY`� (a OC ^� ed �N p OLA 243 u LIjw .e- s g-%= •_� Q. w� m: w `� L`g7 w1L sib eCe. O_ V Y' �Nria .T.4 �a�� etl. ■ E 6K= w � paNw YY �O CCLC i{�. ^N9 &Z � N Lxe� Ve yO =cQ dLCa_�� Y QY. eCy`C N.� ��A.9�Y 6uY N.YiNw les Gbh r yw 6n VYJLC -0� ^yot+ VwpCw ■e 9N^ ^7y Soy, ; c ^� CL w $ br 94u gGj 14^ 4� a 7. r0;.: �L D ^6„ V i1O C1 p� L aL 4V � Ke; V • w� 4J ^� .Y.� Or^ V NCC��r 0 u +max ici u o n�i1 0.. � = tCL .4+sf M� 1�c:�u o1 1 sf` OIL' C` = oj�N1 2°e. -ppw b rye 4yy O Y� 4C $ Y` 101 0 q Jt G C Y cr 4 O 4 N �OC J A � 1Y Y Y~ Y .. • .O M y.� OL �C YV C �� H+ Y. C V R� Gy^ Y 4C^ L.CV yy 6 �' V4M— N r• wa`Rw z : ■■ ~ 9 G J��YO. A L K ��O _ Y KeM QOM H Y �. f G �.Oi KiJ KO rOr. ^� cCC Q W yy O Kv� mi • U� e Wi 0.aCi1N.0i` a Ywr •_NQ y4y r_gy LA-9C �'CO .� •Y ELF LYL Q 4q r Y C i. S Ay <+ N •� w •ri � a V�♦ O y u •i r CVN <N4 OCO ��. ..v �N�C ^ `NW •^M V 4A G Y,N aWUy �4tD C 0Z G■■ Sgls G1 V YG 4yuGy M.� yy L qnd CCC C• � p L P' � •. L ru Yr 1y E a■ p W IS .4; nu t 9JS �' x 4 Ly �uY aiuiY VL@ uCM YC i `�dYCC Gq�B O Y> O N�v AY� Cw�NU � ^n �g�gp YMN WC~ �YµY n •�.� wM~^ 4YO� tCaVM 4�w C. FiOC �CWY • �V, vv cj GG OCO q=wy�_EEcti�G 4wwnNC�i.V. ygLA�y1W Y �`. d Ve.•� CL- a C•�' MYq PAq�O� w�4 V 7V�Y �OYyY �p4V �w C'MN yQ' C��'QQuyjj� LLN LM.S A ^0.��rs�VW. y� aN 4 y.` oOC ��® q9tWy ��` Ord yy�� ¢.�q� �5��• �C�LQ� CY =O; GYw�CM y:N =CC�y �pp s �.6N E` �f C v id ■Q pGj� z y yY n^ • Y w 'OSi OVr Y4^ C YV VLA Y +d M Ny, 1:4i rsVpa j VgfLLti Nu�pLy ffxee Y$1 Lis' w�1l�Yiyr �0 r•[A� wYWNe rYN rYW* •754. `Ceis:6L. N L W� 111 111 C.Z ui i Y PeCQ „w it va gpLL J[i • wNv� 0O� �. ��La�G MeN �wi ,O ow LC Y.Y r gVO `.V C y= ` L_.@ A� ��NCy y 5= SO'S IL VROCL = w CwC C CI �= V Y y66. L T� aw5 .v I �/ w L. •+ Y �w L. M yNO se m LG NN N LM.Y ^'Vq rr O -" PO^ bYw w� A�• ^g .Ve EY S+ L} .Lg.♦ w� �_Mr L 9� L�.� �� C� Y VV 6 !�+..+• M$ & � Ga ° §��aY°� �a�a .N, it N�'op. �M L"ppp n"'y,,a t L 'LJ V ^ ^ YY C w• ` _Y C d b Q a+ a ` M IL N a q C�'1 i M O S Y n M .7 L N~ ♦ ^'YO _q M p x M pa 4 �s w A O a C a r V N 7 Q O Y p p•��Yr 0CL Nt1 y CY'O y v aY+GY° =�i�naS 0Y3 Y!••W g ^�L Ina AV N d q� S nY. Nam T N Y �Nr NNy 4 Ni s u . . �e.:: +� @i BE 4 8 "uwu �y.M�W C L q L��• C7 S:a PC iT W LYL°•Y. Y tl Y � c F 6 6 1V� t c -� ` D w 9 L .•• Y � � 4{ppp p(y rMy �� NM r ia� J }�� Mt•'w�1� '�dp Q{°/M� V H H5 `H V a O Z id u .•v •n O r 11 dY~ � i4.°_v 4� E■ pO� N Y l� L9•,S ■■ yQ pp CC4 6�� .� CC� .Y d"S K��.OJJ+ L O' N L� yQN •. �«' 151 1V.L�' � at`Ol 6AL w4.y IO_ V � COV O. -iK »'a. r tc 6,�'$'M °'�`'i � � � a y.� iJ g � - � � Ti o � —y '�L p� C 36 •, rq wN SgPu:'Cw •�= L g $�gtl o�8 «Sy L° „"°�� S S .�°. .�°. � " fig, �» :•g .•�� »gg N- ler� w33 b s ® lri $� s 3 , ' 3 CM O _ _ N W J ose .N ZG CY � R .. C r C II V C o°C' i `we Y3 .Y-ygC L 61..Y p� 4 E� qqY = �` i•� q`;� COQ qYA` o L A yC_ ^aagY gip. �Y �a Yj Os-113 � y4d .p yY$y y6y� V yy Y H C G C q..YYr �e E71 ry0 .�`.'O OG GY b OgtpN it o ac wGw 6��.N nL !. Y Y Lv % avc.° ..a `� o. o.� a nr��. 6$.pp°•.,Z vw »� o:: ra °O �� a�. °w ^ r was .. •� va°N� Z. i. $$�'» YY�Z =Y. S Ax at; Lw _ w• � 9 °.S fir NN CY9> Ou0i .1�YC ` NpY VY �i �� qN •O eOY W` Y WVON�' K400 .0.6E -L �NQ€ Y p P6Y YY 9 WYt/ A y 4 14 u» OCGtq. u6 79 �~ a lUU y r44aW p64 y1 l a _OM 2 Y it C6 Y M as 9 D M C b .1 L$ ii 3g. N 6 gap g �Vi r.nC Lutitw�w•\ Y sMyy �C "u'A W.�6 _N is= w $ a o -, .. $ y� wy wL1 N» Yw D �.irY gV �f it � M s yyyy i «` L y tai °x' i W y r�w Q M D yy4� yN Yqa wM° W z i0.Y 'C wsf } t NF iy N °» Vy is D H d Oar �wKY.wc L Ry„ wD. }Ne� rWp <y. U Mt�O ro4 I Xs 4 qa�i y�L~II ay pwQ y.C. U�YL 'Y YO a uM Q. 1YxD �.� �4Q rWwW y 0'? L lyw ;.�SY � po 'r RN u wL y D wQ�9� i. yC ✓ 9Y r -91 y Nty C� QrAi YY y Y} Dy CW �40 r � OyD. fYyL�};}} N x 1ga rl' p !�1% W 2C T �Ny � yfl �QyS p QE zL V- tb� y ° \p 9 A'p pp yY [1� . AgL � ? * S �!�IL it MY ii n¢" It be. wSV.N ywYY `� D�+a r'= i. LE M� a► y«qq�� A yy a+` ~.ywi� .•'/c1, WC •iyQ+ 1H 6w �! �~ '¢ q y� y O TC C ly., v4 pi V31 Q�(M4 NV YYg4rr LY3 RYrM rw K{i � sr �NKt. `..Y y�w W++q a ♦N vlC.. �Q �� a '� C �p y 4C`�� 4R� qu�1' M44i 34 Kw� .=r w�+CiVW K4N Kw 1 F tt ii u» M ~y� 79 �~ s aa� lUU y r44aW p64 y1 l a _OM 2 Y it C6 Y M as 9 D M C b .1 L$ ii 3g. N 6 gap g �Vi r.nC Lutitw�w•\ Y sMyy �C "u'A W.�6 63 MO is= Mq+ $ a o -, .. $ y� wy wL1 N» Yw D �.irY gV �f it � M s yyyy i «` L y tai °x' i W y r�w Q M D yy4� yN Yqa wM° W z f,21 'IU �l w ~y� �~ s aa� lUU y r44aW p64 y1 l a _OM 6'je Dwyif :+Qg�y Mw\ g �Vi r.nC Lutitw�w•\ Y is= Mq+ rMi r O 3 if9� 4.j-W- �.irY gV �f it 1 Y yyyy i «` L y tai °x' i W y r�w Q M D yy4� yN Yqa wM° W 'IU �l w 0 a m •n d i C O` •I. u �C.� V^ pL y aaN.. t w i M r fxl ..C.tl� Yc,S' a p ••Ri ` Uay{p0 u 1.vq .GipN b CYy t W 1 O N S eE� c YDN 4 s. 9 rg. G .�. `� �•r !qY! gL� L S is 2=3 1kq� pr � '°. cs~n <y LL Y � ( � ! � Y•. `�. �Q cam- � 6 ! }.Y i 0�Q� CLTggqq 1 YLL LY Q.V > a•/rE jC Y q Vw LL!! O L V h Y a ]f 1► H p4'p� C_cq is 0 0 G g C Yqq O 'Y ' V ' ... L S�Cy GC {py � �y L ■�. Y Y L • qL G w. L O G S q C 9 V$ r— w a E � xY^ s YG p Y Y N y � q.E aM >Y ^r ` q! C.• � qx �' 6 p � Lw.YVo �O 6L Y� w.. y= I+Nr i^• ltY Ate• <} iNV NI M7 <'D 1G. •'<'� `JLSid iSJ {I.. 1�•JSis �C o t n k U CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ��ar STAFF REPORT DATE: May 13, 1997 zs;; TO; Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 13534 Z WIELIAR LYON COMPANY - Ir. to-tai r s en is eve opmen 6f—SU6 con o nium units on 24,67 acres of land in the Medium (8 -14 dwelling units per acre.) ano Medium -High (14- 24 dwelling units per acre) Residential Districts within the Victoria Planned Community, located at the northwest corner of Victoria Park 'Lane and Milliken Avenue AP4 202- 211 -13 and 14. Staff is in receipt of a Tetter from the 4ppi-icant re-( "ting that this iteii be a ontinued for four weeks Therefore, staff re,, Mends {ghat the public hearing be continued to June 10, 1987. 6B Res tfully submitted, ter City P anner BB:SM:sgr Attacftent: Exhibii "A" Letter from Applicant ,y ITEM G 8540 ARCHIBALD, SUITE 8, RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA 91730 • ((1141 980-2244 4 / CiTY OF (:f SC3* C '=AMONt A PJtat w`iSfON 1 May 8. 1987 'Cott Murphy i y1;.IYii #i,.i�if1J)nJ ti City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 80: Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 9173¢ Re: Tract 13534 Dear Scott: At this time we would like to request a continuance of P)-tt,ining 01mmission consideration for the subject tract. We would s��quest ais be continued until the Planning Commission hearing of, ,rune 10,1987. Please contact me for any additional information you may requirR, R Respectfully, 1 (5 Steven Ford Project Manager SF :sn REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT Istr 1] DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: �l CITTOF RANCH&CUCAMONGA STAFF FPTOR"° ` 0 = t 7> J May 13,, 1987 isr Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Nancy Fong, Associate Planner �NVYRONMENTAL ASSESVENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PER;4IT 85 -37 %"IW4rA%,4'tivrei - M36RKtNAb A request ro modify an approve conceptual mas er pan from one restaurant pad to the development of a 2,100 square foot fast food drive thru restas;raant and a 1,750 square foot retail building on 0.84 acref, 0 land within a 9.0 acre approved shopping center iw tr 'general Commercial District, located at the northwest corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive - APN 1077- 401 -22. I. BACKGROUND: The Planning Cc-mission, at its regular meeting of pri 87, conducted a public hearing] to review the proposed project. At this meeting, the Planning Commission raised caricerns regarding the drive -thrti facility as a land use issue. The Planning Commission also was concerned with the potential traffic conflict located north of the site and the stacking distance needed ins the drive -thru lame to avoid traffic congestion. The Planning Como<mission directed staff to further analyze the star -4 �,;� distance required for drive -thru facilities and to work with th4 ap-,?itant in resolving the final design of the area north of site in addressing the potential traffic conflict. With the consent of the applicant, the Planning Commission continued the project to this regular meeting. II. ANALYSIS• A. Potential Traffic Conflict North of the Site: Tie applicant as su' a revise sr e. pan s owing a redesign of the northern portion of the site to address the potential traffic con{'1 .;;. The redesign ali shown in Exhibit "E" provides a drive -thru Cana b, r ;zrate from drive aisle adjacent to parking spaces to avoid parked cars being blocked by cars going through the drive -thru. This redesign his been reviewed by staff (Engineering and Planning Divisions) and the Fire District, dnd determined that this redesign diminishes and mitigates the potential traffic conflict. PLANNIUM CO?NF.`ISSION STAFF DEPORT CUP 85-37,_ MASCARENAS May 13, 1987 Page 2 B. Stacking Distance: The applicant attempted to address this concern of e Planning Commission by providing a longer drive- thru lane, with the capacity of six cars stacking from the menu board and two- cars stacking from the pick -up. winch:. A total of eight cars stacking distance are provided. The applicant also submitted a study indicating the time required to serve the typical customer "s, the arrival rate of customers, the peak demand hours and the anticipated vehicular stacking required (see attached study from the applicant). The primary issue then, is the adequacy of the proposed 8 car stacking distance for El Pollo Loco. -- 'According to the Parking Section of the Development Code,- the vehicular stacking capacity of the drive -thru facility, the design and location of the ordering and pick -up facility will 1 be determined by the City Planner based on appropriate traffic engineering had planning data. To understand and further analyze this issue, staff conducted a phone survey of nine neighboring cities on the stacking distance required for fast food restaurants The following is a 3` ummary of this survey, which indicates a wide variation in the requirements: PHONE SURVEY ON STACKING REQUIREMENTS FOR FAST FOOD DRIVE -THRU RESTAURANT Counted Ordinance/ # of Cars Required as Required Cities Policy for Stacking Parking Claremont Policy 5 from window to menu board No Chino Policy As recommended by staff No Laverne Policy As recommended by Design Review Committee No Ontar,' Policy I space/24' from window Yes Pomona, Policy 3 from window No Redlands Ordinance 6 from menu board No Rialto Ordinance 6 from menu board No San Bern - ardino Policy 6 from menu board No Upland Policy No specific requirements Yes Rancho Ordinance As recommended by Cucamonga City Planner No f PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 85 `)f7 % MASCARWS May 13, 1487 Page 3 B:70d on the above phone survey, the site design and the separate access for drive -thru lane, and the data regarding the ti:. to serve custom<!_rs and the peak demand hours, staff feels that the number o�fars stacking distance providec'' in this project is adequate. A relied secondary issue that the Planninq Commissio,' :4y wish to discuss and consider is if `the nuixber of cars stacked in a drive -thru lane be counted as part of the requited parkin space. The total number of required parking spaces for this project is 35. The site plan ;shows a '.ital of 31 spaces are being provided, tperefore, a shortage of four spaces. however, the applicant N.s provided a total of eight cars stacking distance from the pick -up window, within ue dr ve -thru lane. It would seem appropriate to consider counting car stacking distance as part of required parking spaces. Staff recemmends that the number of cars stacking distance from the menu /order board be counted as part of the required parking spaces on a one for one basis. If the Planning Commission decides that such parking allowance is appropriate and concurs with staff__._ mcoaraendation, then policy through minute action could ,be. ?9ta dished and could be incorporated into future revisions '4f he Development Code. If not deemed appropriate, then the shortage of four parking spaces would require a Minor Exception Permit or reduction in building area. The current Development Code allows the City Planner to grant a reduction of on -site parking spaces up to a maximum of 25 %, through the Minor Exception Permit process.. The reduction of four parking spaces for this project is approximately 11 %. C. Land Use: At the last public hearing , the Planning Commission not retch a consensus as to the appropriateness of this type of land use along Haven Avenue. The Planning Commission was concerned with the visual, aesthetic and traffic impact of such proposed land use. The applicant has redesigned this project, both the situ plan and elevations, to address the Commissions concerns. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order for the Planning Commission to approve this project, facts to support the following findings must be made: 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed use is in accordance with the objective of the Development Code in the purpose of the district in which This site is located; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each o? the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and hr- � d PI At MI*G G0MUS Oil STAFF REPORT CUP 86-37'- WICAMAS ii May, 13, 1587 Page ll 4. That the proposed use, toge0er with conditions appli44ble thereto, will ni.� be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements within the vicinity. IV. CORRESPONDEI4CE: This is a continued public hearing. V. PECOMMENDAT1,001 Staff re.,onaends that the Planning Commil "Sion approve the iR fication to the Conditional Use Permit 85 -37 and Issuance of a Negative Declaration. Respectfully su fitted, Brad Suller City Planner BB:NF :vc Attachments: Drive -'fhru Facility Data from the Applicant I Exhi bi t "Aa - Location Map 1 Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "C" - Approved Master Plan II Exhibit "D" -. Previous Getailed . Sitte Plan Exhibit "E" - Revised Site Plan , Exhibit "F" - Revised Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "G" - Revised Conceptual Landscaping Plan Exhibit "N" - Revised Elevations Resolution of Approval with Standard Conditions I d May 5, 1987 City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 G1.4 p Rancho Cucamonga, calif. 41730 AM 8,� 10 ih121 u 4 5P6 Attn: Nancy Fong Re: Vehicle Stacking Gata Dear Nancy: This letter is in response to your request for traffic study information for the propose,l El Polio "Loco site. I have addressed the Issuea in the same order, (1 to 6), as in the guideline you supplied. 1. El Polio Loco s-';-ves only charbroiled chicken with a few different side orders. I' 2. Orders t,,r'e processed by use of a speaker within the menu board being transmitted to inside the restaurant. 3. From the time a customer drives Into the drive -thru lane to the time they leave the pick-up window is 2 minutes on the average. 11. The average arrival rate f:., c0stomers is: Lunct ;. Peak time - 26 to 32 car 0 hour/ or one ev:;ry 2.05 minutes Lunch: Von -Peak - 5 to 8 cars per hour; Dinner: Peak Time - 12 to 15 cars per hour. Dinner: Non -Peak - 1 to 5 cars per hour. Weekend Lunch: Peek Time - 30 to 35 cars @ hour/ or one every 1.95 minutes. Lunch: Non -Peak - 9 to 12 cars per hour. Dinner: Peak Time - 13 to 17 cars per hour. Dinner. Non-Peak -" 3 to 7 cars per hour. When reviewing this data please keep In mind that E1 Polio Loco does only 30% of its' volume thru the drive -thru. This is substantially less than most other fast food fm7chlses. ar a 5. The sales doy Is broken down into 2 parts. The lunch period is from 10 A.M. to 4 P.M. The dinner period Is from 4 RK, to 10 P.M, Lunch accounts for 67S of the average stores volume with dinner accounting for the other 33%. The percentage for lunch is a couple of points higher on the weekend, Within the lunch period, the 11: 45 to 1 :15 period is the peak demand time. 5:15 to 7:00 Is the peak dinner trai lC time. 6. El Polio Loco stipulates that all restaurants, should have the capacity for 6 car stacking, The preference is for there to be 3 cars from th& service window back to she menu board and 3 cars from the menu board back. Our site plan exceeds tl�¢ total required stac'�ing amount by almost 50%, In addition, I have attached a schedule wI0 he corresponding stacking totals for exist„ �g sites in Rancho Cucamonga. This list shows us as meeting or exceeding the amounts required of these sites. As you can see from the information supplied, we do a majority of our Of business during the off -peak times of the theater and bowling alley. Under these circumstances we would be of morF value in reduct'ng potential traffic problems within the center than would a restaurant that typically Cues avast majority of Its' busir'iess at c_!1 wer time. I hope I have answered all your questions adequately, in addition, i wou1 I like to take this opportunity to thank you for your cooperation and input throughout the application process. Yojr alternative site plan was especially helpful. If I can be of any further assistance please feel free to call me. Since ly, Lonnie R, Priester Controller - KRC Investments cc: q." .,s Ma:,carenas Dan Rlchor8g ` �'CO Fast Food Sites in Aancho Cucamonga - Stacking From Menu Total Board El Polio Loco - Proposed 8" 1/2 & Taco Bell .r Foothill 5 1 Der WelnerschnitzeP Foothill s l Wendys - Foothill 5 112 2 McDonalds - Foothill ;3 4 Kaugles - Foothill 6 Del Taco - Havan 7 2 Dei Taco - Archibald g 4 Taco Bell - Baseline 5 2 Carr - Baseline 6 2 Kentucky Fried - Carnelian 4 112 2 Del Taco - Carnellan 5 5 Carls, - 19th 6 1 y j (_ _ v._... �ii1r = f I - f - t saft— amp 3'i' -•tom- �.C. �M3it S �•c�..�,. S 4 e' r! 82f8 ' t PMB04 -If ,}t t�t *le tnt.rz..) ' i -v Na tt rp- ♦:t IC -_. fib Us •. b { . i ..ti.. - ^�' .� .. >�r r. POP ki i ,teM,✓.��: 2•17 ov 1. lT S4 _ ! M•�Y'FL .WP 7A" No. 472>' f is > 't"� 'a4' W 9575 - •j • � ,� �. a tlpa0l l i 1 P,M. ` ._� 't^,�_'}_ t �(J '1 `•I S i 83Y5 W 4� �4� ��`h� �7�Y� BeeK ' + t >� G u .tIB�9 �t '$ I Z � EL•t,k� � b T 3: MRTH CITY OF RANCHO C'tJ C P { ttv Dn EXHIBIT. SCAM ' Asa UTRJCrA=N aw• NORTF- CITY OF. RAi`>'CHO Ct:CA,�1�Io 'GA PLANNiNL%, DIVISION /-1 -9 5''P3• d8 MM amm mom& Tv� ■ J3& nwww .KM ALLD"Tww e. wean, %760 es. s OYAUM WMAL Law ,M ^ 3xWel w Tors fte una M.." Z^ ♦wpm m�WITY Y�A� � � Rµif !tl RtLiw R 1: 61LLLLi S{pb, MPaN. TYA iM. AlNA ►KML AL40ClT10N S, n LOOO a.— — r GTA"S MKAVRAIBT • M aTAIj,'. LTN k. f Ritter TOTAL LANG 4vw. 9g1O11J.. TOTAL UL m ANNA ,40wo Y. TOTAL —b-m AtYMiAIO] it WTALLIM %ncm TN MAR TOTAL AA.ntawa wemtnxa it KA,..,. /TACIONO w RMMTt T LANG A UVAC> + 1: 61LLLLi FOR / co 1 f 'N d � • a � i v Xw CL at LU c� h'--1 4 N Maw - 4 s RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 85 37 FOR A 2,100 SQUARE FOOT DRIVE -THRU FAST FOOD RESTAURANT AND A 1,750 SQUARE FOOT RETAIL BUILDING LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND TOWN CENTER DRIVE IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT i? WHE'AEAS, on the 1st day of April, 1987, a complete application; was . riled by Sonny Mascarenas for review of the above - described proj�-__t; and WHEREAS, on the 8th day of April, 1987, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described project and continued the project to the May 13, 1987 regular meeting and WHEREAS, on the 13th day of May, 1981 to Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1 That the following findings can be met: I. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements-'in the vicinity, 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the - applicabie provisions of the Development Code. SECTION 2: .That this project with the added mitigation measure will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on May 13, 1987. SECTION 3: That the modification to Conditional Use Permit No. 85- 37 is approved su sect to the following conditions: Planning Division 1. Ail exterior materials, and colors and textures shall match the approved materials and colors for the Brunswick /Deir' Creek Village Shopping Center. A building material sample board shall be submitted for review and approval prior to building permits. l7 ;/Cap r w r, � PLANNING COMMISSTON RESOLUTION NO. `, CUP 85 -37 MODIFICATION MASCARENAS April 8, 1987 Page 2 Am 2. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved site plans which includes architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping and'�rading on file with the Planning Division, the conditions contain herein, and Development Code regulations. 3. Additional -pedestrian amenities such as trellis, seating benches, ,trash receptacles and any other hardscape shall be provided within the central plaza area between building "I" and "2 ". Detailed design of such pedestrian amenities shall be included in the detailed landscape and irrigation plan `� b:* submitted for Planning Division review and approval prior to issuance of building permit. 4. All hardscapes, street fcrnitures such as bike racks, trash receptacles shall conform with the uniform design as approved in the Brunswick /Deer Creek Shopping Center. 5. The iandscapinq, theme shall ;ae' consistent with the approved detailed landscaping plans fk� Brunswick /Deer Creek Shopping Center. 6. All walls including retaining wall shall match the building__ 1 %� n.lterials, texture and color and shall have a decorative cap,. " 7. Any proposed signs shown' on this project are not part of this review and approval. All signs shall be designed to- conform to the approved Uniform Sian Program for Brunswick /Deer Creek Shopping C€ntir. S. Special landscape treatment shall be provided along Haven Avenue and the Town Center Driveway entrances, which shall include a combinatiam of low screen wall, undulating mounding, hedge row, speciman size tree, increased number of trees etc. The drive - thru stacking area shall be completely screened, 9. The menu /order sign shall be located in the vicinity of the trash enclosure to facilitate orders being ready for pick -up when the customer reaches the window. Engineering Division I. An in lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (electrical, a 66kv electrical) on the opposite side of Haven Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permit. The fee shall be one- half of the City adolted unit amount for the difference bettiten the existing electrical and the recently unddrgrounded telephone. ��l ILAN ON NU F 14� FRi:. „ CUP 85 =379f1pIFG” i Y�;�1i45CAREN`AS April 8, 1987 .< Page 3 ;1 `s w APPROVED AND AOOPTEir THIS 13TH, DAY OF PLAY, 1987. f PLANNING !COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RAACHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. WNW, a r[fian ATTEST: ;' a Brad a I I Fr, Rd ro ry °:. I. Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Comission of the City of F Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting oi` the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of May, 1987, by the t411owiiY�ote -to -wits ,s AYES:. COWISSiONERS: NOES: COWISSIONERS, ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 1 I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CgCAA a STAFF REPORT �� s Ah o DATE: May 13,.,1987 197 �. TO: Chairmti;and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Joe Stofa, Jr., Associate Civil Engineer SUPIECT- ENVIRNMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCH_ MAP 10,93 - €e th Lus u7zoan�v - A subdivision of acres o - ia`n nt�3 parcels in the Park. District;' Subarea 16, locate6 at tk -- northwest cowner w,`• A, h-hald Avenue and F=ourth Street, (API: 210 - 062 -13, 11, 02, 26, 33, 32) I. PROJCCT AND-SITE DESCRIPTION - A. Action Re guested: Approval of the proposad Tentative Parcel Map as s own on EXhlblf °B" B. Parcel, Size: The parcels range in size from 1.0 acres to 7.8 acres with 2� in the 1.0 to 2.0 acre range and 8 greater than 2.0 acres. C. Existing Zoning. Industrial Lark (Subarea 16' 0. Surrounding Land Use: North - Vacant - South - Residential (City of Ontario) East - Partial vacant and partial existing industrial buildings West - Cucamonga Creek Orain<e Channel E. Surrounding General Plan and Development Code Dec,'-gnations: North - Industrial Park (Subarea 16) South - Residential (City of Ontario) East - General industrial (Subarea 5) West - Flood Control rhannel F. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant with the land sloping approximately 2% to the south. ITEM I A Planning Commission Staff Report Parcel Map 10393 May 13, 1987 Page 2 11. AN&YIS: The purpose of the Parcel Map is to create 33 separate parcels to potentially be developed by separate -owners. N6,4evelopment p-lans have been submitted at present for any of the parcels. DR 86-37,,also on tonights ag a conceptual design theme for the site. 111. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The applicant completed Part 1 of the Initial -S—t-dy—. —SiiT condu ted a field investigation and completed Part II of " the Initial- Study. No adverse impacts upon tM environm*nt are ant,ticjpaied asa result of this proiect. Therefore, issuance of Negative Declzratiow is appropriate., IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing hi-.e been sent.to surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the 1. site has also bm completed. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that i`he Planning Commission consider all inpu-t--a-q7,, elements of the Tentati�le Parcel Map. If after such cons ideratioO, the Commission can recommend approval', then the adoption of the attached Resolution!" 1nd issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, Barrye R. Hansoi, Senior Civil Engineer BR[i:JS.dlw Attachments- Vicinity Map (Exhibit "All) Tentative Map (Exhibit 911) Resolution and Recommended Conditions of Approval A RANCHO crry or CUCAMONGA Mc D. :r a ti IL wa> C ic a � � a � � a� It'll C kkA itoo 1141 C C 9 5Og $pp� ! Y YWi� —4 Via!' ino r � Of —4 Via!' ino r � RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO )J CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE r' PARCEL MAP NUMBER NUMBER 10393 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 10393, submitted by Keith /Lusk Company, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 33 parcels, the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, identified as APN(s) 210- 062 -13, 11, 02, 26, 33,' 32. located at the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and Fourth Street; and WHEREAS, on May 13, 1987, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearinS for the above - described map. FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVFD AS SECTION 1, That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision, is consistent with the General Plan, 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. a. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2; That Tentative Parcel Map No. 10393 is hereby approved' subject to7Tie attached Standard Conditions and the following Special Conditions; Special Condisions 1. OVERHEAD UTILITIES: a. Archibald Avenue - An in -lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunication and electrical, except for the 66KY electrical) on the opposite side of Archibald Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to recordation of the final map. The fee shall be one -half the adopted unit amount times the length from the center of Fourth Street to the north toundary of Parcel 33. b. Fourth Street - The existing overhead utilities (electrical, except for the 66 KV electrical) on the project side of Fourth Street, including the service line to the south side of Fourth Street, shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the east side of Archibald Avenue to the first pole on the west side of Cucamonga Creek Channel, Avenue to the first pole on the west side of Cucamonga Creek Channel, 10'ik' 11 prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. Reimbursement o- one -half the adopted cost of undergrounding from future development it cccurs on the opposite side of the street is not fea,xble because the property is in the City of Ontario. 2. All driveways shall be subject to the approval of the City Zngineer upon development, 3. Additional dedication shall be provided on the Final Map to the satisfaction of the City Engineer for the following: a. a southbound right turn lane on Archibald Avenue from 'B" Street to Fourth Street; b. an additional Westbound lane on Fourth Street from 'A' Street to Archibald Avenue; and c. Entry Monument sign and relatee landscaping. 4. Constt,;ct a right turn lane on Archibald Avenue from 'B' Street to Fourth Fereet. 5. The developer shali obtain a corner cutoff easement for the northeast corner of ''A' Street and 'C' street 6. Notice of intention to form and /or join the li3hting and landscaping district shall be filed with the City Council prior to ;recordation of the map or issuance of building permit, whichever occurs first. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF MAY, 1987, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAKINGA BY. � arry' T. McN i e , Chairman - ATTEST: � Bra c;" u er, eputy Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secre,:ary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of May, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: s n E a e p� t f E ✓y ` Y — A .,�,.� =�i Y•en « �� ML YOB Y g .1.Y L oe i ^a � =s •� aY a a,,� �� °'� _ mc Vto.. ��Y 3•°Y .SO MO -Y.K� YO iq �` �� wQ ems• ►CC.O = °E cep Y � � g `3 Y 3�a . a- �.L6 �Yaf ~ YYr Y�� S Yom- gj r a �� -� • 5 � .A NY r Y M ff- *w v k .2 2-. -22 t !—,,; — b16 s i.e. 6 = }�jR �U 4 '/y p e nqq6 IME 5 la fig® H ✓G =�g4 j• 1Y1I`11 rgE iFY �`.O �-.�✓ MY� Li,Li ✓o'�$ME --gat C.M4i� 1-- $y$fE^ eg ��•E: I � Y L� Ib. Y Y �/ �• e4y `` u yy « w e1" = 6_l _gF r E J, ;: ii 91—Z 5 rs Y.� ��•E: Y Y �/ �• e4y `` u yy Q. `Y fib• {. E ; ayYJ g� g'� e.Y r6 °avr uu +'e tl$i o• L� ` 'S fbii u � N uw, <s lis�o.w YY tam Wu a uYa ca« r g' XI - aq- VL @� erg it W P.LYi S•Cy.. ��5 •y nc a4 I Y e.E a ° rEy ! Cy C LA r Y •I. ) Ql Oty sr:u tP[ rg i « €� ail a ° pp � I �■ N L pLg Q �41 N «�� ER M .2 L CE urL F4 ■u=� +4 FIEL YL° eyd. 4E E� p� �E LLC "�' YW pY ro'aY '�o• raw wg.� {. Y' �C$ pN .ry Y 1 v G ` G� y W vp $i a p qs ~ 0.$� ��C 0.H idZ � �2 ?r 4= VY ^ 00444,�Rp 09�Q is • A� Auy W Y N , y 911 ♦ +��y L .y G Yq� p YO C � 14 8 .. L /yell{ , ,; 1 1 N M l:: J v = == v =- =�.zst vL2V Vu Vtst7tVlY VtI GU�h?ON ST"F REPORT e } F d: DATE: May 13, 1487 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Crmmission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY Deb'rV Meier, As` start Planner SUBJECT: ENVIROWWNTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 8j -06 OPERT! 1,, u - A reque9 to serve a c9 o ic, everages w n in es a lisped 3700 , square foot restaurant within the Neighborhood Comercial_ District (NC) located at the northeast comer of 19th and Archibald (974G-n.,h Street) - APR: 2024 ' -57 1. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission reviewed this item at their as mee ing on April 22, 1987. At that time the Gorr7- $sign1s deliberations focused upon inviting the hours of operattu,(of the restaurant /bar. The item was continued until the applicant could be available to help dotermine reasonable hours of operation to ba - placed in the Resolution. Another issue still unresolvc-a was the 900 square foot expansion as it relates to ors -site parking count deficiencies. 11. ANALYSIS: A. Hour- of Operation: The Amici's Pizza N Stuff restaurant f pies,.„ y opT" en.11.0 a.m. to 11 :00 p.m. Saturday and Sunday and 11 :00 a.m.. to 10:00 p.m. weekdays. The weeknight and Sunday closing hour of 10:00 p.m. is compatible with the closing hours of Stater Brea. and the Liquor Store and China Garden Restaurant which closes at 9 :30 p.m. On Saturday rights the China Garden Restaurant and Stater Bros. are again closed at 9 :30 and 10:06 p.m., respectively. However, the Liquor Store is open until midnight. Therefore, gfving Amici "s the flexibility to remain open until midnight on Saturday only could be considered. The Resolution contains a condition limiting them to their present hours of operation, 11:00 a.m. to 11 :00 P.M. The applicant has indicated that they are amenaole to continue closing .11:00 p.m. B. Parking: The issue raised ac'the previous Planning Commission me- eei'ng' -was that based upon cumulative parking demands, of each use on -site this shopping c6ater is deficient 113 spaces. } ITEM J i PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT e CUP 87 -06 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA REALTY May 13, 1987 Page 2 Required 417 Provided 30d r Oeficient T13 The code requirement is based upon a naj�ionally accepted ratio of 1 parking space.for each '50 square faet of'gross floor area and assumes a fully leased cinter. It should be noted that a significant percentage of this center is vacant (see table belsw). This is a ma jor in the apparent surplus of ' parking at this center. Allowing expansion of a restaurant, no i&9tter how small, would add to an already deficient count. The Code does allow for shared parking, in which parking facilities may be used jointly by uses when operations are not normally conducted during the sama hour, or when hours of peak use vary. Request for shared parking stay be app -oved by the City Planner per Development Code Section 17.12.04001. The present mix of tenants on this site does present the opportunity for shared parking. The following chart illustrates the combination of existing uses: Anchor Store: Stater Bros. No. of Percent Use of Users of Total Restaurant 3 13 Office E 3 Church 1 -4 ,. =x Retail 4 3F Medical 1 #; Vacancies 4 15 , TOTAL 24 100 Notice that 25% of the uses on -site are Offices that close at 5:00 P.M. Consequently, peak hours for Stater Bras. are between: 4:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m., while peak hours for the restaurant are 7:90 to 9 :00 p.m. Following is an analysis of uses in operation between the evening hours of 7:00 p.m. and 9:00 p.m. t) determine the parking demand for all businesses operating during these hours: I..a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT COP 87 -06 - RMCHO CUCAMONGA REALTY May 13, 1987 Page 3 Parking Survey 7 -9 p.m. Square Parking Spaces Business Footage Ratio Required Carl's Jr. 5,600 1/75 75 790 1j,100 " ' 37 ina C�'rden 1,5601 1/100 Ch' 15 Church �> 2,100 1/35 60 Ice CreaA 1,500$ 11250 6 Liquor Store 215001 -jJ250 10 Stater Bros.2 24,400 1/250 97 TOTAL REQUIRED ;„ 3300 TOTAL PROVIDED 304 1 2,100 square feet of seating area, howey2 "r, 3,000 square feet total church leased space. -; 2 Needed Sunday ror�ing and_two evenings per week only. Although cumulative parking needs far exceed what is available, the differing peak hours and hours of operation of 411 us -^ does not create a parking problem at anyone time. Not all shopping centers in town have the unique combination of users that make shared parkign,.a viable option, The following is a comparison of three other'1popular centers in town with the subject site. Shopping.Center No. 1 Northwest Corner of 19th and Carnelian Anchor Store: Vans, Thrifty Shopping Center No. 2 _ Northeast corner Foothill and ;rchibald Anchor Store: Miller's Outpost Shopping Center No. 3 Northwest corner of Baseline and Archibald. Anchor Store: Alpha Seta, Thrifty PLANNING COWISSION STAFF REPORT r CUP 87 -06 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA REALTY May 13, 1987 Page 4 As you can see the percent of office users, or those leaving at 5.00 p.m, are much greater in the Stater Bros, center and the percent of general retail users much Tess than other local centers. The important factor to consider is that the existing relationshlp -between retail and, office users on Tne su jec size is not necessarily a permr one. s are par ng Is allowed it may not present a pr66`iem now, but if users in this center__.shift to reflect other centers in town, with retail users'cqoser to the 50 -70% range then there may very well be a con €list that we would thr:n have limited power to correct. The Development Code would require a written agreement to the satisfaction of the City Attorney assuring the continued availability of the number of sharad parking stalls. C. Environmental Assessment: Upon review of Part I of the Initial StudY ind completion of ,art II of the Environmental Checklist staff has found no significant environmental impacts related to this request. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The proposal to serve alcoholic beverages wifftin an existing restaurant is consistent with the Development Code. The proposed use, together with the recommended conditions of approval, will not be detrimeni;ri to the public health, or materially injurious to properties in the vicinity. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item is a public hearing continued from April 22, 1387 planning Comm ssion meeting. V. RECOMMENDATION: Two Resolutions are included for Planning ommi ssion consideration, the first is for approval of serving alcoholic beverages within the existing 2,800 square foot restaurant only, the second approves bath the serving of alcoholic beverages end the 900 square foot expansion of the existing restaurant. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve :37-4 Von's Milisr's Alpha Szta Subject Center Center Center Use Site:_ No. 1 No. 2 NO: 3 Restaurant 13 18 9 13 Office 25 4 9 22 Retail 38 74 70 48 Church 4 0 0 0 Medical 4 0 4 9 Vacant 16 4 8 8 TOTAL 100 100 100 100 As you can see the percent of office users, or those leaving at 5.00 p.m, are much greater in the Stater Bros, center and the percent of general retail users much Tess than other local centers. The important factor to consider is that the existing relationshlp -between retail and, office users on Tne su jec size is not necessarily a permr one. s are par ng Is allowed it may not present a pr66`iem now, but if users in this center__.shift to reflect other centers in town, with retail users'cqoser to the 50 -70% range then there may very well be a con €list that we would thr:n have limited power to correct. The Development Code would require a written agreement to the satisfaction of the City Attorney assuring the continued availability of the number of sharad parking stalls. C. Environmental Assessment: Upon review of Part I of the Initial StudY ind completion of ,art II of the Environmental Checklist staff has found no significant environmental impacts related to this request. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The proposal to serve alcoholic beverages wifftin an existing restaurant is consistent with the Development Code. The proposed use, together with the recommended conditions of approval, will not be detrimeni;ri to the public health, or materially injurious to properties in the vicinity. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item is a public hearing continued from April 22, 1387 planning Comm ssion meeting. V. RECOMMENDATION: Two Resolutions are included for Planning ommi ssion consideration, the first is for approval of serving alcoholic beverages within the existing 2,800 square foot restaurant only, the second approves bath the serving of alcoholic beverages end the 900 square foot expansion of the existing restaurant. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve :37-4 v -J`� 1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 87 -06 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA REALTY May 13, 1587 Page 5 the Conditional Use Permit to allow servi �- p with consideratfin of Inpu ram the aRpli open" r, s that square oo expan's an reques . Rasp fully Su tte" Brad Bu er City Planner Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Plan Resolution "A" With Conditlons 1, Resol uti ran "B" With Condi ci ons v -J`� 1 44 TRF,7�17 I'l A 1, AA .,Ora �j lei C=W cab 'A A Et A I wl)s CITY 01.4 RAINCHO CUCAINIONGA6 PLANNING DIVLM,)N NX)RTH rrc,\t. j!�� 97-4ap Tnut.gjrA� A!4�4AI F-Xfijr4Tt-A– — SCALE. -- A82 Construction Ccrnora Irde *ers l hit JAI '® �y "SurriMs Division a , Rancho Cucamo•,ga, Caiiforn.a 917a'i t: Telephone 714-945 -4730 March 06, 1987 Mr. Christer Westman Assistant Planner THE CITY of RAw, rio CUCAM NGA 9320 Baselinr Rd. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: CONDI 'IONAL USE PrrgNzT,T APPLICATION Arris Pizza & Stuft' Restaurant 974 i9l.h. St. Alta Lana, California Dear Mr. Westman: Pursuant to requirement #4. or your standard "Check List for a Conditional Use Perinit" we herein rca;,o4ctfally submit this letter explaining in detail the proposed use or business operation.... As many City employees are aware, Amicirs Pizza & Stuff is,a long Am time operating family restaurant serving many fine Italian dishes. E Az the existing business has been appreciated by the community thereby offer$ng the possibility of expansion, we desire to utilize a vacant 90e square foot space immediately west of thE. existing 1800 square foot restaurant to enlarge the existing seating area of the restaurant. The decor of subject expansion would be consistent w;-`h the existing restaurant. In addition the expansion would provide a total of 48 seats within "booths" which the existing cliente -le greatly prefer. Vurther, an area for private group meetings would again be offered. Lastly, a on -Sale general ABC Class 47 Liquor Lieiense is requested to upgrade the existing beer and wine license. The placement of this license shall be solely incidental to the food service as a added service to our existing clientele. We wish to strongly convey that no change in hours of operation or existing. policies shall 1. made. In no event is it our desire to construct a "bar" atmosphere. Nothing could be less desirable to our existing policies of a family orientated community businegs. Graco Construction Corporation 1 f E i i March'OG, 1987 Mr. Christer W'estman � CITY OF RRiNC � CUCAMON6A. 4 Page 2- corti44ed Thanking you in adva:ice for you review and consideration. /ror I ruction Corporation CUCAMO�NGA REALTY PROPERRTI ES II, LTP ic's izza��tuff os, Jz. ' LBJ: dIa cc file enclosure 2 I - ,F U 4 . _.., E CITY Of. , j 2. E RANCHO CUCAMONGA Tnu. PLANNING DIVEM EXHl r , --5— SCALC- ai -g ol LAC IF I, y jlfM c p cqb c' COD , .. .. `"cam' El�3`f • }.fir � ,_,�� ••!'- '. - •� Y • • ,Y1.+O� 7#1 :�•i ;ink ._ --=_� CITY OF RAINCHO CVCAMO,%,GA LANNING DIVI.SUN T_/0 w _.r I NORTH TITLE-- - 41710"E E%HI[UT- ; SCALE-... _ i EXHIBIT D LIST OF TENANTS 19tH Street Address Tenant Saturday Sunday Mon -Fri 9700 1st Trust Bank - - . - loan Gpm, -, 9710 Century 21 Real Estate X740 Amici's Pizza n StTL llam -11pm llarn- llp►,1 11a�n -1Dpm 9',10 Stater Bros. Market Sam -1 ©pm Bam 9:3' Sam-1 -pm i 9156 9760 Carl's Or. Restaurant Checkers Beauty Salon Sam- 10 :30pm Gam- 10 :y0Pat Gam 10,3(1Yp� 9762 Town & Country Cleaners 8am -5pm - 7am -7pm 9164 9766 Beneficial Finance '_ Tess$e's Card & Girl silop - 1jwsm -5th - - 8 :30a►n- 5:30pm loam-6p 9770 China'aGarden Restaurant 4pm- •9 :30pm 4pm -9 $pm llam,- 9 :30pm 9776 Lutherh Church - 9am- 1100am 7 30pZp, -9pm 9778 Dentist 9am -lPm I 9am, ,,,Jpm 9780 Best Video llam -8pra l +. liaO;,f7pm 9782 Transamerica Financial - 9784 Fantastic Sam's Sam-6 pm p 10am -4 m1 p 9am -8 9786 Realty Plus 9788 Ice Cream an4-)jogurt clam -9pm clam -9pm llam -9pm n�02 The Promise Ghristian Store >> 9 :30am -6pre - loam -BFis. 9,794 Town & Country Liquor 7am -12pm 8am -10pm 7am -10pm 9796 Donuts Sam-Spin 5am -5pm; Sam -5pm 4798 Southwest Swings - - 9am -4pm 'Peak hours noon and 7pm -9am 2Peak hours daily 4pm.7pm i EXHIBIT E „ Peak Restaurant Hours 7 PM; 9 PM Following is an analysis of uses in operation between the evening hours_ of 7 PM and 9 PM to determine the parking demand for all businesses' operating during these hours.; a Square Parking Spaces Business Footage Ratio Required Carl's Jr. 5,504 1/75 ° 75 ' Amici's 3,700 1/100 37 Chita Carden 1,540# 1/100 is Church�7 2,100 1/35 60 Ice Cream 1,5.04 1/250 6 Liquor Stork 2,54,4t 1/250 10 G, State Bros. 24,400 1/256 97 Total 1 Maximum two evenings per week 2 This is not peak market shopping hours, therefore 11250 will be ,a high estimate for this time period. PJI`- i _ I ?�rbfe NORTH CITY OF rrE,%i: RANCHO CL' y10N•CA TITLE= x w PLANNING DIVLgQN E.tiE�i[3IT =� t -i RECEIVED ,TTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNA10 DMSION APR 0 61987 Q FOOTHILL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT -," MORAN.DUM TO: Debra Meier, Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department FROM: Susan D. Wolfe, Foothill Fire District )40,6 SUBJECT: Amici's Pizza &,Stuff MATE: i''pri? 61 1987 Using the scale provided on the drawing, O)tr calculations come to a total- occupant load of 53 persons, not including the` possible eight that could be seated at the far. This will require reclassification of the ocGiaan_y from a B -2 to an A -3. ° We don It anticipate serious problems. The exits will have to have the dead bolts removed and panic hardware installed. Any window coverings or anterior fabrics and /or decorations will have to be= flame retardant treated. For your information, construction has- already been done in their existing suite, closing riff an opening and creating another as I notod in -red. We did not get plens on this. i, t -i RECEIVED ,TTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNA10 DMSION APR 0 61987 Q .y M h. S RESOLUTION NO. "All A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMDNG.9 PLANNING COMMISSIV APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 'NO, 87 -06 tOR THE SERVING OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN CONJUNCTION WITH AMICI'S PIZZA N STUFF RESTAURANT LMATED AT 9740 14Tr( STREET IN THE NEIGHW.dOOD COMMM#'IAL DISTRICT - APN: 202 - 271 -87 WHEREAS, on`,t4e 10th day of March, 1987, a complete # plication was filed. by Rancho Cucamonga Realty Properties II, Ltd. for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 13th day of MLy,�1987, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Comaission held a public hearing to consider the above -dw scribed project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as._ follows: j SECTION is That the folif ring findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord With the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 2. That time proposed ruse, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the v;,tinity. _ 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environmen an at a Negative Declaration is issued on May 13, 1987. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. V -06 is approved subject to e a li owing conditions: 1. This approval shalt be valid for use only wit, ,the existing 2,800 square foot restaurant, 2. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all applicable City Ordinances, Foothill Fire District requirements and Public Health codes. 3. Any modificati n, expansion or other change in operation will require a revision to the Conditional Use Permit. 7 R rjL ON NO. C+4 Oeg Rancho Cucamonga Realty May 13,-44 7 Page Z APPROVED AND ADOPTER,THIS 13TH DAY OF MAY, 19 87. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Larry T. McNi e , Chal man ATTEST: rad Buller, Deputy Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of ;the Planning Commission of the City of 1 Rancho C4-"anga, do hereby certify treat the foregoing,Resolution was duly and regularl_ introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Co+mpissict:, held on the 1 ?±h day of May,, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS; NOES: COWISSIONERS: ABSENT COMISSIONERS: a 4. Ail signage shall be designed in" =nformance with'' the Viand Comprehensive 'Sign Ordinance shai'i require review and appr�xat by the Planning M vision. ' 5. The serving of alcoholic beverages must be in conjunction with restaurant usage. F 6. The Caboitional Use Pe�mit is for indefinite granted, an time . period,, Hw {ever, :in t e event that this use causes adverse effects on Adjacent businesses or properties, the Commission may consider revisions or additions to any of the conditions stated I . ion. 7. The bar in conjunction with the restaurant usa(,p may operate . - ;. between the hours of 11:00 a.m. and.11:00 P.M. ; APPROVED AND ADOPTER,THIS 13TH DAY OF MAY, 19 87. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Larry T. McNi e , Chal man ATTEST: rad Buller, Deputy Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of ;the Planning Commission of the City of 1 Rancho C4-"anga, do hereby certify treat the foregoing,Resolution was duly and regularl_ introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Co+mpissict:, held on the 1 ?±h day of May,, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS; NOES: COWISSIONERS: ABSENT COMISSIONERS: a 0 El RESOLUTION N,. "B" A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE!_- PER IT 87-06 FOP THE SERVING OF ALCOHOLIC 'BEVERAM i': IW CONJUNCTION WITH ANICI'S PIZZA N STUFF RESTAURANT' LOCATED AT 9740 19TH STREET IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTQICT - APH: 202-271-57 WHEREAS, on the 10th day of March, 1987, a complete application was filed by Rancho Cucamonga Realty Properties 11, Ltd. ftr review of the ahqys described proJect--'and WHEREAS, an the 13th day of May, 1987, the Rancho Cucamonga P11 "Inning, Commission held a public hearing to considee, the above- described proj NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cut-,: �-_Onga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 2. Th� ' the proposed 41se, together, with the conditions applicable there -6, will- not be detrimental to tne public health, safety, -'or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. I. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of t-.'Te Development Code. SECTION 2: That-this project will not create adverse impacts on the environmeff —and-Wat a Negative Declaration is issued on May 13th, 1987. SECTION 3. That Conditiotial- Use Permit No. 87-06 is approved subject to-7fffe-TolTowing conditions: I. This approval shall apply to both the serving of alcoholic beverages and the 900 square foot expansion -)f the existing facility, 2. Approval of Zs. request shall not waive compliance with ail sectlons of the Development Code, all applicaole City Ordinances, Foothill Fire District requirements and Public Health codes, 3. Any modification, expansion or other :;mange in operation will require a revision to the Conditional Use Permit T-19 RESOLUTION NO. CUP 8746 = Rancho Cucamonga Realty J May 13, 1937 Page 2 4. All 0 9nage shall be designed in conformance with the Comprehensive Sign ordinance and shall require rlview and approlai by the Planning Division. 5. The serving of alcoholic beverages must be in conjunction with restaurant �Qjge. 6. The Condit3�:nal Use Permit is granted for an indefinite time period-. However in toe event that this use causes :adverse effects on adjacent businesses or properties, the Commission may consider revisions or additio:rs to any of the .onditions sti.ated hereon, 7. The bar in conjunction with restaurant usage way operate between the hours of 11:00 a.m. and 11 :00 p.m. S. Approvil'of the 900 square foot expansion. is contingent upon preparation of a written agreement, assuring the continued availability of the number of stalls designated for joint use, as required by Dev:l'opment Code Section 17.12J10D.1. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF MAY. 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larrry T. C 7E d Kan - ATTEST• Brad u: erg Z puvy 5ecretary "- I, Brad Buller,, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the ;4y of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly 'and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the '`- Inning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the.Planning Commission held on the 13th day of May, 1987, by the following vote -to -wiz: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIuNERS: ABSENT: `kAMISSIONERS: r ll 16 CITY OF RANC110 CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 13, 1987 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Debra Meier, Assistant Planiler SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE 86-09 H. T. I. ZMET WIN - Requests to aecrease the minimum Duilaing .atzrlacz ii-ad required landscape average along 8th Street, reduction of sideyard setback along railroad right-of-way and elimination of outdoor eating areas fofr a proposed multi- tenant industrial project located at �4 n6rtheast corner of Baker Avenue and 80 Street - APN �v 271-01. RELATED FILE: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 66-43 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRI'�T%PNL---:--�� A. Action Requested: Approval of the Variance and issuance of A Negative Declaration. Ii. -Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: or - Santa Fe Kailroao;-Wa—rehouse Distribution; Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 1) South - Single family residential,-school; City of 6tario East - Welding shop; Industrial -;,',Pclfic Plan (Subarea 1) West - Vacant land; Lcw Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) C. General Plan Designations: Project bite - General industrial North General Industrial South City of Ontario East General ',:ndustrial West Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per, acre) D. Site Characteristics: The site runs approximately 1,300 feet a venue eas and is an', 70 to 80 feet in depth along the 8th Street frontage, The site slopes nortlixest to southeast At a 1% gradient. ITEM K t+ PLANWNG 00MMI-iSTON STAFF REP RI ' DR eR -43 - H.T.T. CONSTRUCTION z, May 13, .1987 page 2 II. ANALYSIS: A. General: This application has been filed concurrently with ;^ eve opment Review 86 -45. Approval of this Variance is necessary for approval of the site plan as submitted. 1. Building Setback and Landscape Average. The Master. Plan of Streets es -;gnaw ft 'dth Street. as an 88 foot wide ' collector. The Induustrial Specific Plan requires a 35 root pd Average I Capin depth building setback, on collector gads, as measured fr00 curb face. However, the Industri,41 Specific Plan does give special consideration to,kh Street s: west of Vineyard Avenue. Due to the limited. pth of the property, the 1ocs4 st set setbacks and land s Y_ (95 feet) shalt apply. The site'pl � submitte proposesga building setback renging from 18 f *jt at the west end to 26 feet at the easterly end of the project and an. average landscbpin ' depth of 21 feet. The subject j:,roject is 80 feet deep at the east .end and 71 feet deep at the went end as measured from street right-of- way. ;onsi deH ng the depth of the- property, development would op signif�cantiy restrYcied ➢ : pplying a constant 25 foot building ,`setback %` and lam -.cape. average to the project. ;, s1701ar Vak#anre was granted for 8th Street Industrial Phase One and the st<*eetscape concept used will continue for Phase Two. i 2. Sideyard Setback. 8y definition, in Development Code Section .; , the fry,_: lot ,lure on a corner tot is the, shorter line abutti' ,o a street. � Therefore, the side lot 11ne is that line abuttiog the railroad tracks. The Industrial Specific Plan regUr s a 5 foot.sideyard setback - along that line. Tha intent of tH2 foot setback was to have the ability to scraen and 'buffer projects from future development. Since this lot litre abut7 the railroad lino, t.,e intent of tats setback is not appli• able, in audition to the fact that if combined with a 25 tcat setback along &th Street the property is further restr.cted from any effec*',ve development. 3. Outdoor Eating Area. The Industrial Specific Plan (Part TM-B.5) specifies—that "employee outdoor eating areas shall be provided as an integral part of stite designs". The applicant requests a Variancz! to delete this requirement because the romhtr -lion or constraints on the pi-dect r.,?vld make it difficult to prov de a lunch area without impacting •equirtd parking count. 9 X- i PLANNrAO -C'OMM�rSWJ S�lAFf REPORT OR 86.43 - H.T.Ia Ceh:frzur;Tfou i May 13, 19$a Pa4e 3 III. FACTS FOR FIND NGS ~State law, as,, pll as toe Cit;- Zoning raI , P gives a t_anrsing Com�rissioii the authority to approve ~`+ Variance for certain development standards only when special circumstances apply to the .property, such -as size, shape or too rap Wall create undue -hardships. Also, Var.-.aces may only be granted when the strict enforcement of *.he &,,ing Ordinance ho result in practical difficvlty or unnecessiry hardships inconsisiie, with the objectives of the Ordinance. In this case, the cembinati on, of the- collector read desijnation ands- shallowness of the property is r unique char edristic uncommon to industrial properties in Rancho,xtueamona.; The design solution effectively' utilizes the amount of latisscaping proposeiy,to mitigate any', dvers`e" Kisu:,l. .-effects. Consequently, the plan, a consistent with the objectives'of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and strict interpretatfon of the -Code would result in p ^'; 3 difficulty. --' In addition, 'the granting of this Variance ►a+D1[Yii (1e:' iI 'construed as the granting of special privilege and is not detri'mentai 'o the public health, ;00,,y or, welfare, or materi all I ",-injurious to properties or improv ents ire the yicinit . 1;V. CORRESPOUDENCE; Thi,: item has been advertised as a public hearing in Tfie a� y eport newspaper and all property, owners wit! "n 300 fee a su sec site have been notified. In addition, public hearing not1ces have wee» posted on the subject property. 1, RECOWNDATION: Staff recommends approral of Variance- 85-09 ttffroug a p ion of the attached Resolu *ion and issuance of a `H,ugative Declaration. Respectfully submitted, BraTB;ql er City Planner BB:DM:ns Attachments: Exhibit "A" Industrial Specific Pldn, Subarea 1 Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "G" - Landscape Detail Applica „t's Latter Resolution of Approval k a cRCLRATIOw 12C+' R.0.W. U 1 R.O.W. �fi9a or "ess R.O.W. WL SERVICE -1 - - �-- - Entscing Propo ed C 406' 809, 1600, \�)! CITY Or T rrcm. RANCHO CLCA.rvl GA Tom= - I � - PLANNING E jv&ON °�i = /� 5Cr � C. Not. CITY OF ,rrm, RANCHO CUCArvj%,Ut PLANNING Divmc)N Z-,.57- SCALD t / i ATCH "' T0,'.,2"KA UWA TFE RA 'may .__. -. � ^- 1� � wdt � � �n'•s I.�m. lu -- f vig 1 i llY L AA —_ C ---j 23 sRr =d Taac Not. CITY OF ,rrm, RANCHO CUCArvj%,Ut PLANNING Divmc)N Z-,.57- SCALD t •A. JAr.A4LwIG► A1�KDy7.UFC ♦ .. S%A ' - � Iie�C..,:S ..lt':s..; ie5 PWt71.Ytlw.!•fiw.i"+^t.RT' r LP466�YTORH�a mows 17 1rsYry A"ear uLn,erM4 6 H 195pAWFllf W�!.SP�Rrdi,1.Y " o+:- y(n&�.c20 1VI46FrXtM p Ptu+r� u�++maasus« Murk Mr IB6Ul., ,; f" MAW i,�Fi++tf+u� rctgl�4 tuy Murk NWi. u�y' i tya►, 1 Cs 4uYfa0iMON �/ihFi43L�9 vIA W'6 Aau fbyrL*=lsj Spas Y, Flcaly�J{li�}tr G[iGEP�ds FYi '. I dotAo-6lrA64 N Nb6l.. � M96s14aa Ii61DIGP6:� ' R!'REtF+,Y IRi -• .. 4 Gay.. _ _ 4 _ A pvTl+�u. �f l,r�ouu► 4LP8 006%Y � d cuige lnt f lRY1 1L "aG. :� . �rN •5�9' "?g}INliL p1Y6 d�p�yi pgllX _ zt tfat�o" '.?Fk{4�,�'a�"1 � /��►soPY'1iAC6 ;;;is,i�t,�ra� i -4N0Pf �%RE.2 RANCHO CUCAfvloNGA PLAi`3N14NG DIV5T-N F. XEiIMT- SCA Lr -. &NO RT = HT1 Construction, Inc. Y� Generat Condors LC. - 425532 . u 10722 Attowllout;. StAte 102 � 'Yr Rancho Gueamoega, CA 91736 ♦" } Telephone.- (714) 980 -3664 December 29, 1986 �r . CITr OF RANCHO CUCAMONG1r (l " Planning Department 9320 "C" Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 9173 Re: 3th Street Industrial Centerf Owner: HT't Construction, Inc. 3 Request for Variance To Whom it May Concern: qyr i The proposed project is presently being submitted for Design /Technical Review process. As pa=t of the review process the Owner is; cTuesting: a variance. This variative is requested under pzovisions of the Rancho Cucamonga Industrial ` Specific Plan; '7art 3- Development.& !:andazds and ouidelinest. Sub area 1 SpecL ,`.i Considerations, which status the following-. "Although the right- of-way on Stir Street west of dine and is y greater than F ..,. 541,, the local street setbacks for buildings and,. parking shall apply. However, cons<dering the shallow depth of pat -3erty on the north side of 8th Street, the average depth of`, streetscape landscaping required Shall be determined during the Technical /Design Review process." The Variance includes the following: 1. Reduction in Building setback: Presently, the building setback required on &th Street is 35 feet from the face of the curb. The proposed project ranges from 1&0' to 25,78 feet. It is impoeint t,,o mention that the present property depths range from 71.02 feet on the west property line to 80.78 feet an the east property line, taking into account that we have had to deduct a minimum of 12 feet of land along 1290..94 li.'iear feet of froncage. in addi ion, we had to improve approximately 1900 lilear feet of street to allow 8th Street att 88 foot right -ow -way. Providing any additional building setbacks, along 9th Street, will impose an economic hardship to the feasibility of this project. 2. Reduction in the required 35 foot landscape average. 3 Reduction of required 5 foot side yard setback (along the railroad right-of -way). 7 HT[ P,,pnst!juoi a q, Inc, Caen4ro11>on(racts �d1SSws ^bC. 1e #22 AriaarRa�2e Rvltr 102 V, J " , RMiCho Cucamajisa, CA 9178(1 Teta; ynrte: (714f i8t1 96G& t t - VA ' CITY OF RANeRO CUCAMQNGA December , ^19, 19 86 4. Caria:ice to provide 'outdoor eating areas. ..Provision cf ating areas will 6 t recgitire encrouchment :to thj parking areaa. kaaking fadilities are more °' important to be maintained. The rite has too fi�any constraints and limitations. x Furthermore, the proposed requi.remcnts will be consistent with the guidelines sat in the Industrial Specific Flan and will be ,compatible with the approved Phase I of the 8tU Street deve'lomen., which is presently under construction, {2 ShSuld you hav8 any questions, please feel free to cr_;xtart me at yotk- ., earliest ;. convenience. ' ResPectful.ly sui, -, tted, ' ME CDNSMUM -10N, INC. Lyle J. Dornoff Vice Presiv.:ent / ?,JD /akm cc: Jorge fi; Garcia - Garcia a Associates Architects ..h f i Cry 00- RA(ICHO CMCR:,piCA PLANNING 4P/15IOt� 1 Jlui 0 5 t AM P�ti ;- %ESOLUTI(,N N0, 5` A '20PLPTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONSA PLANNING COMMISSION CPPAW RG VARIARCE NGt 86 -09 TO DECREASE TH,E MINIMUM Eu1LJING SETBACK AND LANOSCAPF'AVERAGE ALONG af STREET, F:r.IMINATPM THE SIDEYARD S -wT$ACK ALONG THE PAILROAD e kiGHT -OF -WAY AND ELIMNATANG THE OUTDOOR EATING AREA FOR ' A PROPOSED MULTI.- TERANT KOJECT LOCATED , AT THE M!ORTHEAST CORNER OF 8TH S'[k, ET ANC BAKER AI�ENUi . IN THE GENERAL DISTRICT - APN 207 - 271: -01 WHEREAS, on the 29th A.dy of December, 1986, an application was filed and accepter on the above- described project;. and HHiFSAS, the property is a minimum`71,.02 feet in depth tM a maximum of 80.78 feet in depth with 1,290 feet, of length; and WHEREAT,, a .similar `Ariailce was granted for 8th Street Industrial Phase 0ne; and -` r' WHERI AS, on the :lath day, of May;- �'1987 the Planning Commission held a duly aJ ertised public hearing pursuant to Section 66854 of the 'California Governmert Code. Affik SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucauonga Plani•tig Commission has made the following — findings; 1. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified ,egulation mould result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Industrial Specific Plan and the Development Code. 2. That there aru exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or condit,ons applicable to thy, property involve l or to the intended use of the property that do nit apply , generally to other properties in the same district, 3. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified 'regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. 4, That the grantinu a7r the Variance will not constitute a grant v specfal privilege inconsistent wit4 !the , 1 limitations on other properties classified in the �Aw district. 5. That tht, granting of the Variance will not be >detrimental to the public health, safety, or werfare, oe materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 1 ut o kk May 13 1987 Page 2 APP.,'OVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TI,' VAY OF,MAY, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY,OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNi-el, chairman ATTEST* 'Brad Ba etary ity I. Orad Buller, Depu�ty Searetary of the Planning CrAwisgion of ti* C of' Rancho Cucamonga,,do' hat-the foregc 7fievleb��certify t dnq Resol6tion was duly qnd regularly introduced, passed, and adopted Oy the Planning Commitston, of the City of Rancho CuCWn,qa, at a regular meeting qf the Plailning Commission held on the 13th day of Kay, 1987, the.follow19 vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: �---- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF IREVORT x o A,-' � DATE: May 13', 1987 1'97 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission _ FROM: Brad Buller; 'City Planner BY: Nancy FL�ig, Associate !Tanner SUBJEt T: ENVIROwZ174L ASSESS14ENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86 -37 liEIiffTCR - e nave opment -OF a master P I an for a7�;. aZi'cre industrial park consisting of 33 lots in an Industrial .Park District, Subarea 11L located at the northwest quadrant of 4th Street and Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-62-02,-, 11, 13 26, 32, and 33, ` (Continued from April 8, 19€$7 meting) Related f�-le: Parcel Map 10393 I. Background: The Planning Commissio,_ �°,as continued this project r�MTarch 25, 1987 and Apri l 8, , ,4 r'egul ar meeti ngs to this meeting 'at.the raquest_of the applicant. II, PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of conceptual Master Flan and ssuance of a Mgative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: or - vacant, existing sing e- family 'tomes; Industrial Park District Subarea 16,` Loaf Residential vistrict (2 -4 , dwriling units per acre) Snuth - Vacant, apartments; City of Ontario East - Frito -Lay Distribution Center; General Industrial ,Subarea 5 Wes;. - Cucamonga Creek, City of Ontario C. General Flan Designations; irojee i-te - ndustrial Park North Industrial Park, Low Density Residential South - Not Available - City of Ontario East General industrial West Cucamonga Creek - City of Ontari=o J PLANNING CpiS,IO! .STAFF REPORT 77 DR 86 -37.- KEITH /LUSK COMPANY May 13, 1987 . f D. Site. Characteristics:. The site' is vacant and ve�tation cap Is 5 ov e"-3 saying vineyards. Located at the corner of 4fila Street and Archibald Avenue are, approximately two mature palm trees and three other unidentified mature trees (see Figure LII -8 of the &enaral Plan ). This corner is also designated as a primary gateway to the City. Ill. ANALYSISt A. General the intent of this Master, Plan is to, serve as a g5 a ine for Future development through establishing driveway access, overall circulation system,f, drai„age patterns and architectural design concepts. All future development within the Master Plan boundary would require, separate Development /Resign Review. A related parcel map is also .being considered by Planning Commi ;ssjon at this meeting, A separate staff report has been included for your review. The proposed;. Master Pan subdivides the sits_ into 33 parcels 1,anging fvW, the size of 1 acre to 7.8 acres, The Master Plan Is designed'.fcr ind tsxrial lot sales program. Individual or 1 combinations of iots will be sold, designed, and ultimate ` construction will be the responsibility of the buyer. TO emphaize a pedestrian oriented campus•7ke setting for the Master Plan, the developer is proposing to install all necessary infrastructure as well as pprimeter landscaping along k 40 Street and Archibald Avenue as A marketing tool for this Mater PIan of lot sales program. J V €r B. Design Review Committee: The Committee (Chittea and Colemanl ar g a ally reviewe a proposal on December 4, 1986. At that - time, the C ittee raised the foilowing concerns ano recommended that the developer revised their plans to be submitted for further •Committee ew,. 1. The site planning design guideline should be expanded to include provisions for shared' access between parcels, limited access on 4th Street according to tha City policies and no asses, <( fit: �rchibal d Avenue. 2. The Master Plan b(,dnaaries 0ouid be expanded to include the triangle piece: to the west abutting the Cucamonga Creek. The reason for requiring the blaster Planning of this piece is to assure the tips of the triangle would not become a "no man's land ". i <AANKING CUNISSIDN STAFF REPORT OR 86 -37' - XEITHAUSK t MPANY May 13, 1987` Page 3 L 3. Nritten criteria shou'l4i be added , to encourage building placement that.,Cr&iie Opportunities for plazas or other open spaces encourage to spatially enclose d Tt, opa„ sh_ on the sama site or adjoining site. Building orientation should - include:_ conside -ition of winel protection for site activities., Graphic examples should also be provid44 sueplementing.rhe written criteria. 4. Written and graphic criteria should be added to the Master Plan for the uniform design of perimeter fencing wail should the users require such a security ''fencing. 5. Spacial de,', jn consideration in the areas of building massing and r'andscape treatment should be provided to >` tha corner of 4th Street and Archibald Aven:ie as it is the gateway to the City. 6. Detailed pre?_{sainary grading plan should be provided that chow concepts of on4,4e grading for each parcel development, and to be subk,\itted for Grading t'"jnaittee review. ` 7. Written and graphic criteria should be added for providing design consideration to the lgx:a }ion of the i loading areas. 8. Graphic examples should be provided with those proposed design architectural element features as listed on page I, 21 of the Master Plan text. I 9. Graphic examples of landscaping parking lot should be provided in the Master Plan. The developer revised the Master Plan to address most of the Corsi tUe concerns as menti oncd abcivc. Ue of the nevi si ciis include r locating the proposed 5trept "G" to abut the westerly adjace• . property as recommended by the Engir, ;rering Division in prow' ,trig adeit -oral frontage accesi for this triangular piece of Parcel. Other revisions ingibde providing graphic examples in the Master Plan in areas of entry plazas, visitors entries, exterior people space, perimeter fercing or wall, architectural design features, location of loading areas, and parking lot landscaping. However the revised Master Plan did not address the concerns of shared access and-tte special design ennsiderations in areas cf building massing and landtcape treatment at the corner of 4tri Street and Archibald AvWiue. The Design Review Committee r� PLANNING OMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 86 -37 K61TO /LUSK COWANY lay 13i =1987 � , Page 4 e reviewed the revi_sea Master Plan on February '9, 1987 regular m -eeting a^ = 2anerally find the Paster Plan text to bE; acceptable except for the shared access and the buiidin4 massing issues. The developer' requested that these twos issues' be forwarded to the Planning Commission for dis'ussion. c. isslos: 1. Shard Access- The developer stated that the Nasty V Plan 1 - prograim is for individual lot sales where Individual' access into the parcel is preferred. The developer also stated that shared access between adjacent parcels may create maintenance and liability problems for thi developer as well as the tenants. Staf Comment: planning Commission policy is to encourage rsnared access between parcels, especially. wtw!n an opportunity arises through, the development otfi a Master Plan. The fuinimfte purpose of the si.argd access is to the number of conflicts presented to the drivers on streets and thus increase safety as well as safeguard the streets ability to carry as much trif €ic as possible and efficiently. Therefore staff reewmends that the Planning Commission adhere to the City access policy, requiring the establfshment of criteria for shared access. Exhibit "B" shows examples of shared access design that are acceptable to thct City. 2, Special Design Considerations in Areas of Building Massie end Landscape Treatment at e Corner or ree a.n Archibald venue: The developer stated that an arc ec'eura or ull&rg massing concept has not been developed for this corner. The developer prefers not to. develop SUCH, design concepts aZ this time. Staff Convent: The Committee made this recta mendatt n requiring special design consideration in areas of building massing and landscape treatment at this 'particular corm due to the fa.:t that it is a primary gateway to the City. Th- Committee is requesting for some conceptual sketches to �aaliSh criteria for future develc;xnen� 7Wd not intend for the developer to prepare precise plans. According to the Development Code, the purpose of master planning is tai, "plan ahead" by establishing procedures to address special or .unique needs or Characteristics of certain areas designated by a Specific Plan. Therefore staff recommends ` that the 'Planning Commission adhere to the Committee' recommendation in requiring the establis;nt of c:ita.ria e PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT OR 85 -37 - KEITH /LUSK COMPANY May 13, 1987 P4ge 3 rj for special design_ considerations in areas of, buile+�,hg massing and landscape treatment at this particular corner (see Condi, :an 5). 0. Enviranr6iia, Asse,sment: Staff slas completed' the nvirow+n;as Checklist and hms found no signi ,Icant adverse,, e61roncs;; al 'impact as a result of this_ pr ifAct. Further, 1 each individual parcel development would require a sep 'arate environmental ass,�ssment.t:a assure that no accumulative,adverse environmental impiet would occur. If thc-- , #Tjcnajng Commission concurs with these fincrags, issuance of a Ne'gWve Decl . would be appropriate: - IV. FACTS FOR: FINDINGS: In order for the Planning Commission to approve tfils proposed Master Plan, facts supporting -"khe following findings must be made: 1. That the propos *d project is consistent witir abj ,Ives of the General Plan•and the Indas, r al Specific Plan; Jlr-4 i Z. That the proposed use',is in accord with the object l4e of the wh Industrial pecific Plan t e perpvset�,,,Of the d %strict in the 3. That the proposed use is in congliance with etch of t0- applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan and the Development Code, and 4. There are tk.� proposed use together with the conditions applicable thereto„ will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welf,z or mat -riall r Ijurioas to properties or improvements i ;% the vicinity. V. CORRESPONUNCE: Notification to surrounding property owners within ee v ti`ie' project zite boundary has been sent nut as requi red by Subarea 16 zf the Industrial Specific flan for the March 25, 1987 regular VI. RECOMMENDATION; Staff recommends that Planninf CbmFmission consider ail the ma eia' input - regarding this project. if the Commission concurs with the findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration anJ, approval of Development Review 88 -37 would be in order, 1,, q , , �;,F,17 - - 'PVvAV N O OR 8 PARY , : . kay: 13� 1987 Page S-,. t�l Respec�' Ully s iwilrt_ed, Bra uller City planner BB:NF:vd Atimchments: Exhibit "A" - LocatiO Map • Exhibit "B" - Shared Access Coi,cepts Wf6i t "C" - MastO; Plan. Text Resolution of Approval with Standard Conditions r k { , j j r TO 0 2 P A. da 6. tv .1711, c� NORTH CITY OF ITEM- RANCHO CUCAj�vjoNC;,A TITLE,- PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: *,SCALE- f: "r f` CCr—r'FAM F- Vr,5 6,N5 MOT Iry el C \ORTF CITY Or, mat: A6- -f I RANCHO CUCAi-VI® \NGA TITLE= l- i PLANNNG Dit'LS m F- XHIPAT: SCALE- CORNERPOINTz 4 MASTER PLANNED DEVELOPhENT Rancho Cucamonga, California T A B L E 0 F C 0 X T E N T page No. I. INTRODUM-TON . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . PRWECT CONCEPT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11. DESIGN CoMpONWTS .A. Concept Site plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . E. Illustrative Plan . . . A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Concept Site PlaM'Irawinq . . . . -Drawing . . r1lustrative..' Plan . • . . . . Ill. SITE PLANNING A" ARCHuMmax Gtar)ELuEs A. Building intensity B. Landscape Coverage . . . 7 .. . . C. Building Heights 7 D. Setbacks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E. W; Access Points . . a Pa�cking Requirement"J s- 10 G. . . . . . • . . . . Sidewalks . . . • . . 11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . H. ' Storage, Service 4nd Loading Areas . .. 13 I. Refuse Collee_t1-1 . -41 Areas. 13 , . . . . • . J. Screening Of Zkt;6rior 14e . - - .,. K. cbanical Equ:kpxent Screening Of Exterior Electrical - 4 14 is Equipment and Transformers . .. . . . . . . L. Fences and Walls X- Utilities and Cozmunication Devices . 17 19 TV. ARCHITECTuRAL GUIDELINES . . • • . ♦ • • . . . . • 20 Architectural Character Sketches V. LANDSCAPE cogCEpT A. Introduction Landscape Concept Drawings and Plans . . . . . VI. PHASING . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 VII. GRADING AND DRAINAGE Allowed Uses for Industrial Park . . . . . . . . . 44 Tentative Parcel Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 Contact and Reference List Traffic Report . . . . . . . . i i I INTRODUCTION This Master Plan Development is intended to implement the City of Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Area Specific Plan. It has been prepared in concert with the ' Specific Plan recuiremexxts with for Master Plan Development and addresses the sjoutherly portion of Subs -Area 16, located at the nQ1r'• =westerly quadrant of Archibald and w 4th Street, The General Plan has designated the site as an "Industrial, Park''. The City of Rancho Cucamonga-C General; Plan and the Industrial Area Specific Plan has stipulated that a Master Plan be prepared for Sub -Area 16. A summary of industrial park used for the sub -area is ortl:ined in 'the rear of this document. The purpose of this Master. Plan will be to assure that the project development, named Cornerpointe, will be a single unified and controlled design statement. This Master Plan framework will be the guide w1 �iin which development will take place. A uniform application of these guidelines will: o Implement the Industrial Area specific Plan. - o Pztablish and define specific design controls. t 5' o Act as a stimulus to achieve a common desian goal. o Ensure design coordination among adjoining parcels, E- i This document will work in conjunction with City ord_nancesland the Industrial Area Specific Rlan, PROJECT CONCEPT' The Lusk Company, the owners of the property 4�:-idressed within this Master Plan Development, intends to market this project as an Industrial Lot Sales Program. Individual or combinations of lots will be sold and design and ultimate construction will be the responsibility of the buyer. The design of each building site cannot be determined at this time; however, this Master Plan will guide the ultimate ` designers to a common design statement. t D43/04105MP 3/26/87 1 D43/04105MP 3/26/87 2 LL � v �.1. The design components which comprise this Nester Plan '! develapatent include the following: Concept Site Flan Illustrative Plan r Site planning and Architectural Guidelines Architectural Character Sketches Landscape Concept Plan and Design Studies Each of these comzonents is described, in the"',foilowing sections. A tentative map is also being ¢' submits #d with this Master Plan which indicates lot sizes and proposed infrastructure, i It is included here for reference purposes. r 1 D43/04105MP 3/26/87 2 LL r *, II 5 N COMPONENTS A. Cancerst Site Pan -, This plan illustrates potential building envelopes within the proposed lotting and street pattern for the development area.- The intent is that buildings I would be generally located in ,a predetermined area of each lot in order to achieve building massing at primary corners and to create predominant architectural massing. The building envelopes shown indicate the "desired" location for buildings ,. on each lot and these bui,l4inq areas may be composed of one or more freestanding buildings. f The boundaries, _ of these envelopes can be somewhat flexible, depending upon final building configurations, b►lt represent tLe approximate location of bt!ildings on each lot. IP Accesn points are shown to accommodate. circulation for each parcel. If in a, situation 'ire several lots are consolidated into gen al, , ��if'li grouped. In lip, 3.Lccess P general, a-cass points should be carefully located in -that the breaks in the landscaped parkways will be' l4,na .ted. The l intent is to provide a visually dominaA landscape A edge rather than a series of random acc,,ess drives. Acceris will be limited on Fourth Street. No secondary access wiles be provided other than that shown on tithe plan. B. r austjatavQ Ptah The illustrative plan takes the Concept Site Plan one step further. It shows what could be building and parking layout for typical parcel, development. The Purpose is io show the variety of conditns Possible and common treatments that would io be consistent through the project site. What gives_ the project unir�ieness is its flexibility with similar treatments of parking, screening of storage areas, and building setbacks. This Plan is a conceptual interpretation -7f parcel development under this Master Plan, it is an attempt to show design relationships; however, final parcel design shall be submitted by each individual parcel owner. D43/04105MP 3/26/81 i I a r a„ a a : ' h ILA 0 NIA *� ,----- n n n Vr` �p a / i Ali— W � r" p q r a„ a a : ' h ILA 0 NIA *� ,----- n n n Vr` �p a / i r" p q r a„ a a : ' h ILA 0 NIA *� ,----- n n n Vr` �p L% W w 3 zz ..uj . r' x0LU �wF aBi IL An i m w w �Y J lu l it i— I er ago •. <+' I is u. 1ve. ra r 7�'� wQ gz rat. �..._ i s e,: • ,u, a�.gi n n r� x Euu1 vW'Q uJ�Y1LL1 do y M. �u, tQZ Qaa a�¢w wLU D wcau °C"' >u U Z >tu lui 1u�—, d 00 f t� « � III SITE _PT NG -_ Y AND AR[*HTPLTnY+r,ne, r�GUID YTTSFQ These guidelines are to be used in conjunction Industrial:.krea Specific T Plan Guidelies. TheyigQ not ` supersede, but complea«ent, said Spa ific Plan Guidelines. However, to the extent: these faster Plan Guidelines are more restrictive than the Specific Plan, they shall prevail. I. A. iiSt VV Obti ecti vtsc 1. To ensure that the intensitv development is not excessive detrimental to or the perception of cornarpointe, as a unified a3e -ies industrial of Nparksw. '.. To ensure that the site development does not excWC'Ively impact uti :ty or transportation 1. Site co verage should be con proposed with the proposed use with the pasrX4 -4 requirement said land use. for 2. Minimum lot size shall be one acre.. 3. Transportation improvements will be consistent with the findings noted in the traffic report At the rear of this document. B. I�a1iG'ksCaDB COygr, »� , ;g ves 1. To ensure that at least a minimum portion cf a'. development site is devoted to landscape mater3ais in order to maintain a sense of continuity with adjacent sites and to contribute 'to the perception of cornerpointe as a 'spark like" environment. - 2. To ensure that at least a minimum of landscape materials are, available on a development site D43/04105MP 3/26/87 !_ f '7 1` D43 /0410$MP 3/26/87 -19 8 'i - in order to contribute to" the environmental well-being g of potential rr users of each Mite. 1. A minimum of at least 15# of the area within the property lines of a developm`gyt: t,ite shall be devoted "`tc landscape- matejq-als. (See additional landscape requirenk'fnts in the landscape concepl� portion ..of this! document i nd refer to Industrial Specific Plalk for details regarding the specific requiremeni�;s.i C. �ui�d,n� Hiahts F ` Oki ect{ tie I. To maintain a reasonably conisistent and co:apatible, height profile throughout Cornerpointe, Guid_, e3ines I- No bui ?.ding shall exceed four stoi;ies, or 751, in height. (see Industrial Specific Plan far further clarification.) o�iec ;v 1, Xo achieve a feeling of opennesill along the streets that reinforces the pe2*ception of Cornerpointe as a series of industrial "parks ". 2. To encourane some regularity of spalie formed by buildings cn either side of a streel.. 3. To achieve a landscaped setting between the street and buildings. 4. To provide fora street -side edge which will have a landscape character that will unify the total development and be slIfficiently distinctive in design to ditferantiate Cornerpointe from other business developments. D43 /0410$MP 3/26/87 -19 8 'i 5- To provicL vehicular lines which allow discrimination of one company from another. 6. To provide vehicular sight lines which allow safe ingress and egress to properties tnd safe movements along roadways. 7. To accommodate major Cornerpoints identity statements at street intersections leading into and within the park. I- Building setbacks shall be as follows cept when modified as set, t in Industrial' Area �x Specific Plan. Street Classification Setbacks Dettrained From Ultimate Face of Curb Average Depth of Building Parking Landscape* Setback-'* Setback*** --------- ------- - - - - - -- Major Arterial And Special Boulevard 45t 451 251 Secondry 351 351 201 Local 25# 251 is# The average depth shall be uninterrupted ;4�oZ the face of curb, except for sidewalks, Pedestrian hardscape,_ plazas and courtyards, and monument signs. Street frontage walls and fences over three feet (31) in height are subject to building setbacks. Average depth of landscaping must still be provided. Front: AS shown per street classification. Interior Rear: Hone. Except when rear-lot area abuts a side street, the setback shall be SO minimum. D43/04105MP 3/26/87 Q 9 �1 01 Rear Abutting Street; As .shown per (street _ csassiiicati.on Interior Side: 51 minimum. ` Street F de: As shown per street classifiCAion The Preceding section was excerpted from the lndllstiIal Area Specific Plan. 2. Properties adjacent to residential areas shall have ", minimum of 451 b} kding' setback from, property line on interior lot "lips. and 450 from - ultimate face of curbs on abRttingg Qtreets. . 3. For buia-d,inga exceeding two (2) stories or 351 as mgae�ured from highest finish grade, whichovax.is more restrictive, an additional it setback measured from ult'!,mate face of curb shall be required for. aach additf,,nal 1 - + height. This-setback need not exceed 70+. AUk 4. All setbaark areas stall be fully landscaped in R a manner both compatible with and complimentary e r d the on-sit e architecture and landscape dsigrk ':-,osicepts. E. ?2t Acc2 ± - ves I. To provide a clear and logical vehiculrz k paiY.t to a lot. 2. To limit the number of curb cuts at the street in order to maintain a uniform Landscape edge tm the street cape. Guide i es I. Lot entry points should try to be groupeI to allow fo:: long undisturbed landscaped stra et edges, (example: two adjacent lots 2s,�4ve lot entry points near property lines) D43/04105MP 3/26/87 �% f C1 10 F. x�cina Fteguyx?mm�ts �; Ob-i actives 1. To provide sufficient an -site parking to r, accoupodate a -11 vehicles associated with the use cif eac%- lot at: any one tiu4j-jnd therefore not require vehicles to be parked on pu2rlic roadways or on lots of ether companies. 2. , To configure rarking areas such that they a; e utilized by Patrons of main structure and nvt utilized by neighboring structure patrons, Parking - Requirements a. Warehous ny or building for storage:: I space per }-; 000 square feet for then first 20'000 aqua's fr' feet: 3 grace per 2, 0,00 aware feet for tbte se-ond 20, 000 aqua —, feet: 2 space per"4,000 square feet for all space in eatcese of the first 40,000 square feet. b. Industria3 /Manufacturing. I space per 500 square feet. r,. Research and Developments 1 space pe,,! 350 Square feet (research services only).. d• office and Administration: 1 space per 250 I square feet e. Multi -use tenant buildings where office use does resat exceed 35% of building area: 1 space per 400 square feet. i The precedir:l standards are excerpted from the Industrial. Aria Specific Plan. 1 2. 20% to 35$ of all aired q parking stales shall be devoted to { � compact car u;e. Minimum stall dimension shall be a f In cridth and 15, in length and marked for compact cars, D43f041057-- t, 1 9 E 3 All parking areas shalt be buffeted from ,public view through the use of Jserms, landscaping materiel, and low wails. 4. All loading facilities and maneuvering areas must be on -site with the use. 5. All loading facilities shall be' Permitted only in�the rear and interior side yard areas. 6- side width to loading clocks shall be a minimum r~I Of SW width, $xclusive of truck parking area, Plus additional width for truck parking (typi ally dr_ to 50 feet) ... 7• Loading 4° ,ociG4 shall be estha,ck a minimum of 70, from street` property line. 8. Parking stalls far trailers 'tihall be 50 141 and Providcmi at a ratio of 1 stall per truck loading dock door. 9 Loading facilities shall be adequately screened from t1;.e Public view by building appendages, walls, thereof. fences, landscaping, or a coilbination 10. Minimum aisle width adjacent to loading,.areas shall be 16 f one WWJ. and 281 for twos way. 11. Should businesses locating on a cornerpointe d.evcalopment sits wish to encourage the fOmation of car pools by their emplolt�+es, cons�dOration should be given to designating resented "Car pool" parking spaces. `Designated "Car Pooh' Designated be given preferential locations in relatively close proximity to primaty +:mployee building entrances. 12. Designatec: "cycle Parking'` areas should be considered for the convenience of employees, using bicgc2.es or motorcycles. an order to avoid the clutter of cycles parked in unplanned locations., it is recommended that planned Cicle Parking" areas be conveniently located to emuloyee entrances and be provided with racks having security locking capabilities; D43/04105MP 3/25/97 -� 12 G. jdewa s ab-}ectives ti 1. To provide a safe all - weather efficient and aesthetically pleasing means. of'pedestrian circulation connecting lots along the stresteide perimeter. y 2. To provida a safe all- weather efficient and aesthetically pleasing means, -of pedestrian caireulatior� serving each site. ' Guidej ines i 1. 5treetside sidawalks will be installed by the eventual let builder within perimeter landhcapa easements. Interna4l streetscape sideval%s will be installed by t?,-4 eventual lot i "ilder. 2. on -sits pedestrian circulation systems shall be providad to meet the circulation needs of or_- Esite users. Such systems should provide safe, all- weather efficient, and aesthetically _ pleasing weans of on -site movement and should be an integrated part of the overall architectural.and site design coroept. 3. Where usage dictates, connections should be made between on -sits and perimeter pedestrian circulation systems`, - H. S_�orace, ervi�e, arc +adina Areas bed vs 3. To ensure that storage, service, and loading areas are located upon a site so as to minimize . the visibility of loading and service vehicles from primary visual exposure areas. 2. To ensure that the storage, service, and loading areas are designed and located on the site so that service vehicle activities and movements ft not disrupt the efficient flav of on -site and otf -site traffic. D43/04105MP 3125/87' Z 13 / said ---- ernes 1. storage, service, maint4bance and loadir.q areas must be cons�tructed,'maintained, and used U. in accordance Stith the foliowiug conditions: a. Unless appzaved in writing by the city, no materials, supplies, or equipment, including trucYts (;r other motor vehicles, Sall be store upon a site except inside a closed: boil i or behind,A visual barrier screening sulih materials, supplies, or'' vehicles from adjacent sites. Any storage areas screened by visual barriers shall be r, located upon the sear portions of a site. b. Provisions shall be made on each site for any necessary vehicle loading and not on- street vehicle loading shall be permitted. c.. Loading dock arean shall ba setback, recessed, or snreene&. �� I. Refuse Ca �pctian Areas Qbieotves , 1. To ensure that re not vis fuse and refuse containers are ible from primary . visual exposure area (streets, primary image entry drives, floor's of image buildings, common visual and recreational amenity areas, stc.), 2. To ensure that refuse enclosures are r: Offectivkly designed to receive and contain generated refuse until collected, and enclose: j refuse containers after refuse is collected. 3. To ensure that refuse collection vehic i.- have clear and convenient access to refuse collection areas and thereby not contribute to excessive wear and tear to on -site and off -site devElopments. Ir k f v D43/04105MP 3/26/97 / f (� .3 14 D43/04105MP 3/26/87 / _17 li AML =5 .udel�s I- All outdoor refuse containers shall be visually . scr'agn=sd within a durable 6,0" or higher non- ` com gable enclosurei so as not to be visible c frotr adjacent lots or sites, neighboring properties or streetsq No refuse collection areas shall be permitted between a street and the, :front of a building. 2. 'Refuse collection areas should be effectively designed to contain all refuse generated on- site and deposited between collections. Deposited refuse should not be visible from outside the refuse enclosure. 3. Refuse collections enclosures should be designed of durable materials with finishes and colors which are unified and harmonious with the overall architectural theme. 4. Refcise collection areas should be so located. upon the lot ass to Provids clear and convenient E access to refuse collection vehicles and thereby minimize k, wear and tear to on -situ %and Off-site developments. , f 5. Refuse collection areas should be designed and located on the lot so as to be convenient for the deposition Of refuse generated on -site. J. Screening of F�}et�ri o Mechanical F r�+ent 9biectives 1. To have all exterior components of pl=bing, Processing-,, heating, doling, and ventilating systems not ba directly visible from within the lot or from adjoining streets, lots, or build�,ll,s q Guidelines.. 1. Exterior components of Plumbing, processing; heatina, cooling, and ventilating systems {including but not limited to piping, tanks, stacks, collectors, .heating, cooling, and r' D43/04105MP 3/26/87 / _17 li AML =5 l ventilating e gaipment ,:ans,`blowers, ductwork, . vents, louvers,_ meters'e compressors, rotors, s Incinerators, ovens, tcm shall not d= irectly visible. be ,I 2. It is 'recommended that, in tha case of roof- mounted mechanical- itiipment, building parapets be of such a height that roof - mounted screening deVlces not be required. It building parapets do not provide the required scrvening, mechanical equipment shall be screened b an unobtrusive screening devica that will appear al; an integrated part of the overall architectural destU.n. Wher* roof- mount,�d mechanical equipment and /or" ductwork project vertically more than one and. one -half (1 -1 /2) ' fesNN above.the roof or roof parapet.it shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature With the building design and is detailed consistent with building. Whers roof- mounted mechanical equipment and /or ductwork projects one and pne -half (1 -1/2) feet ar less above the roof, _ = <roof parapet it shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the , building in all rases. 3. Any devices employed. to screen exterior components of plumbing, processing, heating, cooling, and ventilating systems from direct view shall appear as an integrated part of the architectural design, rnd as such, be constructed of complimentary and durable materials and finished in a complimentary texture and color scheme to the overall architectural design. 4. Any exterior components of plumbing, processing, heating, cooling, and ventilating systems and their screening devices that will be visible from upper floors of adjacent buildings shall be kept to a visible minimum, shall be installed in a neat and compact e shall be to allows with uth it visual background. 043 /0410 5MP 3/26/87 7 /� 16 f tf 5. No exterior components of plumbing, processing, heating,.cooY,'�ncl,,and ventilating systems shall be mol *y4ced Oh ,any building wail unless they are an integrated architectural design feature. K. Scraeningnv Exterior Ele ^tr *ca Z gu merit and Trans -o � s bbiectivea 1. 1'o minimize the visibility of exterior electrical equipment and transformers from primary visual exposure areas (streets, primary image entry strives, floors Of image buildings, and common visual and recreational amenity areas, etc.) 1. Transformers that may be visible from any primary visual exposure area shall be screened with 4ithez planting or -a durable non- corbustibla enclosura (of a design contiguratio :z acceptable to public utility) Where, possible, it is recommended that refuse containers and transformers be integrated into 'the same enclosure. Z. Transformer eralosures should be designed of durable materials with finishes and colors which are unified and harmonious with the overall architectural theme. 3. Exterior mounter] electrical equipment shall be mounted on the interior of a building. wherever possible. When interior mounting is not practical, electrical equipment shall be mounted, in a location where it is substantially screened from public view. 4. Exterior mounted electrical equipment and conduits shall be kept to a visible minimum, where visible shall be installed in a neat and orderly. fashion, and shall. be painted to'blend with its mounting background. D43/04105MP 3/26/87 C._ -�� 17 � "..iO 1 lFa L. Fences_ and Platy c3b�i ect i vc�s i. To pewit the installation of fences and walls within -a lot for the purpose of site security, sound attenuation, separation of functional activities,, and screening of unsightly functions and activities. 2. To have fences and walls installed such that they provide an integrated and complimentary architery'+sural design element adding interest to the ov i11 architectural design concept. 3. 'fo :ace # no walls or fences reduce the intended all y of development or reduce the .perception of �rnerpointe se a series of business "Parks". 4. To discourage the odnstru.:tion %f wall, ar;+i fences except as necessary to sir -d-n outside storage, loading, and service arf:al. 5. To ensure that fences and walls do not, because Of their height, location, or design, contribute; to a ,decrease Zn the safety or efficiency of traffic flows on -site or in fronting streets. Gu�dei;nes , I. No fence or wall shall be constructed closer than thirty (30), feet fron the curbline of a- fronting street unless it 3� of a height not to exceed 310 ". 2. No fence or wall shall excd'd a height of s'o" unless otherwise approved b�� the City of Rancho Cucamonga, i 3. All fences and walls shall�lbe designed as an integrated part of the ov4v.all architectural and site design. All m ;�!'!terials shall be durable and finished in Wxtures and colors.- complimentary of the overall architectural design. Is D43/03105MP 3/26/87 L -2R 18 4. Chain link fencing may be used in areas not visible in the front setback area. M. Utitigies and Communic�+-i�*+ ^vices Ob`e t ves I. To have the Cornerpointe interior stream scape project visually free of unsightly overhead power and telephone lines, utility poles, and other utility and communication; equipment and components 2, To protect off -site utility systems from ;j becoming over- burdened by individual lot utility systems. To achieve minimum disruption of off -site %utilities, paving, and landscape dusring construction $.;•x maintenance of on -site utility ,1 systems. C�uY aei�nes 1. All exterior on -site utilities igil.uding, not limitod to, drainage systems, Aewere, gas lines, water lines, and electrical, telephone, and communicatiorhs wires and equipment, shall be installed and maintained Underground. ?.. on -site und ,ground utilities shall be designed alt instalL_d to minimize the disruption of Off-site utilities, paving and landscape during construction and maintenance and shall,- be of such a design so as not to place excessive burdens upon off -site utility systems during the course of use. 3. No antenrI or device for transmission or recepta; of any signals including, but not limited to, telephone, television, and radio, shall be placed on any lot so that it is visible from the primary setback area. 4. Temporary overhead power and telephone facilities are permitted during construction. D43 /04105MP 310'26/$7 E3 k. 0 IV These guidelines are to be used in conjunction with the Ifidubtrial Area Specific Plan Guidelines. They do not supersede, but complement, said Specific Plan Guidelines. However, to the extent these Master PJLn Guidelines,are more restrictive than the Specific Plan, they shall prevail. 1. ProfaQte industrial and Yud" siness park devel9pment while enhancl,-4 the physical el\virq'njent of the community, 2. ;nsure land use compatibility between parcels '��ithin the project. 3. Snaure land use compatibility of the project with land uses on adjacent�koperty. 4. Encourage high-quality Architectural and site anr�ing for the project,',. e one I- All structures erected within the project, with the exception of trim and minor arch"ctural features, shall be constructed of masonry, concrete, stucco, wood, glass steel, or other 0 materials of a similar nature. 2. Exterior walls shall be painted or suitably treated in a manner that is be exterior con t clyn materia . ;goming to thd s' I Zi Atih otAOaLl uide in 9 1. Building form and architectural style are intended to be consistent with the overall design theme in the business Park. d6nformance with the following will help achieve guideiine- this objective. 6.4 2. Apparent building mass can be reduced through sensitive articulation and surface treatment of exterior walls. Long unbroken exterior walls D43/04105HP 20 D43/04105MP 3/26/87 .� 21 should be avoided. Where buildings are more than one •(1) story in height, staggered or layered vertical articulation reduces the visual impact and creates a sore interesting architectural impression. In some cases, especially on. large lots, clustering several small buildings in the place of one large building will reduce the appa?;)ent bulk of development. This affozys a good Opportunity for exterior amenities such as landscaped courtysrc?s, walkways, and Focal points. 3. sensitive arrangement and proportion of exterior window openings, exterior fascia treatment, and building a0cent areas, kelp relieve the massive appearance of large expansive exterior walls. variations in tke pzoportions of window openings at the lower'' level of a building structure soften its transition with the ground plan." Recessed window openings also provide relief along the exterior building wails. �! 4. sensitivity to the general appearance `01 the overall business park ahottld be' used in selecting building colors to° keep all structures compatible with erich other. Accent colors are acceptable in moderation, but strong non - conforming color schemes sill be considered unacceptable. D43/04105MP 3/26/87 .� 21 rl! It Pi Cfc-c2RPOINTE t 40 rI —. _ f A s~ t r � �{ 23 r Z � 1 1 X11 L CO AmbiL 6, i• r t ;. rI —. _ f A s~ t r � �{ 23 e 1 e'A - C i LU vw. r 1 f e 1 e'A - ARTIST'S CONCEPT THE KEITH COMPANIES ry 7 i �I l i -1 731 'ME KEITH COMPANIES I.Y1i V / �. . W M.1A law M-4� �4.��a `I ��:N�nni, 27 LA�YDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN The landscape consists of e exterior spaces. Thus laments that give form to is created b ' the character of the .landscape and setbacks Y elements such As streets and building the variety and placement of landscap elements. Given that project arc within hitecturt% and bul,lding sites types and s CornE :rpainte will Most likely be of varying izes f landscaping as a design element: will play the key role in creating and ctynveying the overall character of Cornerpointe as a "parklike :+ working environment.. The purpose Design Guidelines is to : then, of these Landscape will help to ensure that Cornede design criteria which that is distinctive, COrnexxPointe achieves an image Unified. y understandab? e f and A. JntXqdU2tjaa As a part of the Cornerpointe Mast., nifj, ape Plan has been conceived to organize, unif r, and create a distincti penraon into individual sites. They <' wi5l reca�;tl the agr$,cultural hedgerow and baffles east /west winds. The east /west streets will- incorporate a random groupings broad head -trees that will be sheltiered by the hedgerows: North /sputa+ r ern i StrP�r m.-ees fucal;ffUs s deroxylon rosea Eucalyptus polyanthemos Liquidambar sty.1raciflua uPalo -Alto" Finus elderica EastlWest r�+ternzl� stree cupar�_opsis anacardiades Magnolia grandifolia Pinus elderica 1 . > $. Accent Prunus caroliniana E C:horisia speciosa Arbutus undo - standard H. I*�terior .or,p The Interior Zone encompasses all exterior elements from the landscape Easement to "the building. This zone is subject to the needs 02 each individual tenant and thus is mOInt to have a greater degree of'ileixibility than the streetscape zontk. Common concerns within this zone include. parking lot arrangements and landscaping, regul4tory ana directional signing, and service area screening. It is intended that the interior zone of Cornerpointe recall the orchard and /or grove -like Infill. character that existed between hedgerows of California farm communities. Parking lots are to be planted in-gedaetric patterns with s low canrspy tree 2. LandscaFe Co----yera?e A minimum of 15% of the area within the property lines of a development site shall be I i D43/04105MP 3/26/87 G I 29 r + r 1 1 t t - devoted to landscape materials unless otherwise' a) : proved. 3. arkina Lot Tree Plant ?na Reau remeh4c:. a. Tree wells and planter areas within paved parking areas shall provide a minimum 3' clear planting space. b. Txee well and Planting edge curbs should be used in lieu of wheel stops. c. One (1) Planting finger ever 10 spaces. d. one (1) tree per three (3) parkirdg spaces. Perimeter plantings are included in this calculation. a. Provide shrub scre�'jn planting around exterior of parking l��t. t 4. Psrk3 na andedestri►_- Circa l atic�n fi Aft a. Parking location and layout should facilitate easy and safe pedestrian circilation. - b. If the parking layout is one or two rows deep, a walking space f-ith a minimum width of 4' between stalls should be provided at strategic locations C. If parking lots exceed two rows in depth, the alignment of the aisles should be in the direction of the pedestrian movement. S. ParJrina Lot Plant Material List A single species tree is to be used for each parking compound. The tree species may be different in separated parking compounds. Suggested. trees: Cupaniopsis Acerifo7ia Pistachia Chinensis'._, 5chinus Terebintaifolius D43/04105MP 3'26/87 'r a 6. p; -a a Goncen a The foxlaV+znq landsr` ape concept and design S� studiesi. illustrate thel tycsical ^on3it�Eons and treatbents that wil3 be �;.ctui mod, eornerpointe. at D43/04105HP 3/26/ 87 l J 26 4 I� t\ � V R 1 ;f� r �! v t 6 $ + 9 Rig �� LL , dzaZ utppi I 4 Pal L' c R�QRN = IOSA '. /l��... •� � I W PS w. 11 11 11 _ ik (R gm- C� Q ll i I� ( 1 { THE 'il H Y COMPANIES -' .tiw� s4a4w r 4.w IwMV �A4.'1� ,W 4M _,1 0 Aft?> 2, `at PJel-.7 14140 e4qoUNDCovp.. �51 lqvwr wo l4epoegl THE KEITH COMPANIES WO- 33 ml 1200 MUWX 0 THE KEI'T'H COMPANIES WA -, ookcefi'l- n {... - "TCf� i 34 W� I lll�' - - '�-7 G-f-V,A WA�k rte. THE KEITH COIVIPANIES �`Y 35 n y� • AE i+ NU (T� 7 z < i •_• W C z0 a � O k z < a tU -30 •_• W C z0 a � O 0 tu w N W 0 Q c!) rL _ c W it LL ft1 2 t: s _ Qy H a z LU ¢ ^^ w >- ZZ w mw � � z o � W (co < Q a. Q a U i cn `= L < uj 37 t Ul cc w a 5 W z 'o 1t j c7 m LU J a j � s ti a W V �p�1.. • •. 1 Lu.. • Q ra 1 4 W �y Z �•.. sn w > W c a F° w a Q x n 12 p _ LL a U `_ -"7k z mgt a W w Z C o �o d v ¢ Q W rjbl U) J J UJ CL Q Z 38 In Ll- O M � 47 ilA N Q U N � r UO-V Y U a m LU CO LL cn N F i UJ z CC w W s W a Q N o J a: X z :3 o cc C) Y U Lu >- Z z M r� w 2 w CO z o OC) 0 w `-' l- U j o U) Cn J U 5 t co w r V, EV .r wZLL y w ul cr j It w !- � a w N LLo ap Ir Alk t!1 . -- w • n cr ` � n LU tu _ w i"" N } (ry Q ti ( H ul cr 1 \i W CD in cc p w °C CJ z L_ z UlW u�lyUf u'I�1 CL < r� G y •• J n c¢j r U,j f r w ui w ` �x cc' a i m w W m a cr 03 to to [ F T �• o f i to AML LU . 1�a 1 c tL Y 2 w en Fes- Q w w Q wcc �... n¢ F V J !¢-4 Fes- VT j`'a• �•. �.. g== z i cn n o w " � ) _• C4 '� IL z to 41 71 A VI The proj ect area is int6nded to be Phase. lot :n-- I developed in one sale'� progra ti�,, development will consist �f, �11 street and infrastructure improvements necessary t;q,�allov in individual lot sales and dd4elopment any portion imPlQmentit-lon of of the property, qp vall as the perimet4r-'-indscaVe treatment along i Arciiibald and Fourth Street. D43/04105MP 3/26/87 41 ,.,;v n , VII GRAD I gG & DRAMA ; The grading concept for the property is intended to bui]d upon the natural fall of the property from north to south..yThe ultimate grades of individual lots will �t flow this natural fail of the land., allotting drainage to either, drain to abutting streets or to drain cross adjoining ��' lots (cross -lot drainages to adjacent streets. Thie cross -lot drainage concept is proposed to eliminate tie need-.,-to elevate the rear of lots -for `to streets;.` and in so doing, minimize or eliminate 2:1 manufactured slopes bet;yesn lots,.. This concept will require dr:irage easements over lots *which will be shown on the tentative tract map for the ' property. E c ` D43/04105MP 3/26/97 // ,! 43 t r' 2 -AR _ f Land Use Designation Industrial -park Primary Function %.'his sub -area. serves;? as a transition from more Q) intensive industrial sx commercial , acti�:ities -, to rqv, ,dential areas in the southwest corner of the, CitY, As such, new development must be sensit ve ;i to :: the c surroundings with appropriate architecture and site planning ,to mitigate potential conflicts. Land uses within . the industriy ea should be compatible viit surrounding uses nG--th 00 5th Street and along Archibald to provide for use ,itivities associated with ' airport such as tourist commercial. This sub -area is located between 5th Street and 4th Street and Archibald and Hellman and contains property substantially undeveloped. it lies adjacent to a direct access, to the Ontario Interniitional Airport axed is located at 'a gateway to -the city. Permitted Uses Custom Manufacturing ' Light Manufacturing Administrative and Office Professional /Design Services Resesrch Services Light Wholesale, Stor�c3e, and Distribution Building Maintenance- Service4 Business Supply Retail Sales and Services Business support Services Communication Services i Eating and Drinking D43/04105MP 3/25/87 44 I� Ask D43/04105MP 3/26/87 Establishments Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Services Hotel/motel Y Medical /:Health Care Services, Professional Services Recreation.Facilities Adpinistrative Civic Services a= Conditional Uses Automotive Rental Automotive Service Station Convenience Sales and Services entertainment Fast .Food 'Food' and Beverage Sales Funeral and Crematory Services Personal Services Cultural Public Assembly Public Safety and Utility services> Religious Assembly -;_, i i Ask D43/04105MP 3/26/87 1 �9 Lr, i Al a Al { i r U lc=J �v�..� i nnnE. ..�._ .e�s�•+ 1. Alm .� 1 A A&-- mot A . .� 1 �9 Lr, i Al a Al �. 2 Li r U lc=J �v�..� nnnE. l� r7 � 2aTACY' ,AND REFERENCE LIST DEVEL40PER: They Wsk Company 17550 Gillette AVenu Irvine, CA 92713 Carol- 11annino U� Don Putnam � DESIGN CONSULTANTS: The K-with Companies 200 Baker street Costa Mesa, GA 92626't„ Roger Mobley Bob Cunningham Steve Butz GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES: City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Planning Department Phone: (714) 989 -1861 + Engineering Department Prone: (714) 989 -1862 Building and Safety Division Phone: (714) 989 -1863 I _43/04105MP 3/26J87 w �] 47 14431 HAMLIN SVREET • SUITE 1 t VAN Nuys. CAt.IFOt2HrA 91401 ' 818J785 -1578 Zt�'J67� -1578 g s' } October 15, 1986 Mrs. Carol L. Pennino Project !Manager >' Indus', 'I Division The Wk Company P. 0, Box C- -19560 . Irvine, California 92713 Subject: Cornerpointe, Business Center '946-1cho Cucamonga, California File too. 2102-00-00 Dear Mrs. Pennino., i;- As you authoriT_ -S in your letter of Octd,6tr 2,. ,= S, we have valuated the Y adequacy of the proposed access to and internal circulation within the area l designated as Subarea 16 by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. - ``'`• Subarea 16 is bounded by Fourth Street, Sixth Street, Archibald Avenue, . Hellman Avenue, and the Cucamonga Creek Channel. and it consists of a fi total of approximately 14;_:l acres. Of that, Cornerpointe Business Parrs x )uld have a gross `4rea of 79.4 acres {68.4 acres of lots and 11,0 acres of streets;, The remaTh.,148 65.6 acres of Subarea 16 are owned by others. The prJpoicd access to Corr painter Business P., ,'would consist of three local p.blic streets that would; intersect the arterial streets. i i I. Fourth Street midway between Archibald Avenue and Hellman Avenue 2. Archibald Avenue approximately 550 sect north of Forth Street 3. Hellman Avenue at the north sid+c of Cucamonga Crt: approximately 700 feet south of Sixth Street In addition to the local streets that would provide exv, real access to Subarea 16, 0. xe would be three external access itrir d Nays. 6 1, Sixth Street opposite Klust -in. Avenue 2. Sixth Sirvet WI)Oshc Amethyst Strcei CC y { 3, :1rcltil .tlif kvenuc Yrri)rct ;i natcly 1,130 t.;et math ca Sixth Srre t `,;> y"M1`7N / tl r Mns. Carol 1, Penning Al October 15,198a' Page, 7 The three ladC: streets that provide external access plus two other local streets wot,ld %arm the internsl circulation network that would provide access to the individual Cornerpointe Business Park loo and to t`Ye of the si.-t- Subarea 16 properties that are owned by others. Thy only Subarea 16 Property not served by the Proposed internal - street network would bt the Ass= Neili -Property which may have access from adjacent properties or from Archibald Avenue. Corne.pointe Brsiness Park and the other pro perties wit in Subarea 16 have been ,proposed for development industrial as parks, cx "` t for a 4,77 acre P arcel that would be developed as a State of California Dr ` artment of Motor Vehicles (DMV) office on Fourth Sere-et east of the p Jpo5ed local strseA The traffic, vol}smes that would„be generated by the proposed industrial parks weree'estimartd on theba� "f J _ tri p generation factors In the p ch i' cation , Trip Generatlon— i- R,rdM on, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D. C., 1982. The traffic volumes that wouy be s generated by the DMV office were estimated, on the basis of -the factors in the publications, 9th Progress l Report on Trip Ends Generation Research CafJnts and 11th Progress Report an Trip Ends Generation Resrc ch Counts,, published by the State of California Department of Transportaion in San Francisco, Caiifarnia, in 1974 and 7974, respectively, In Toole i ' i are the estimates of 24-hour, morning peak- hc..t;3nd afternoon peak -hour traffic volumes that would begencrated by the proposed Subarea 16 developments, The directional distribution of traffic in Table 2 was estimated on the basis of the configuration Of the arterial street network and the locations of - psidential developments, other industrial developments, and freeway interchanges. - 1 CL w J'I ID_q sa 4!. '^ N tu ... 9 V :7 C Cl g on � Lu 4m Z F F jjj J� t g i x x g W � K U. it _ _.. Wes' y y 7 b.� owl P� ae ca m In m m i i i4 r i W u u " 4� � k Mrs. Carol L. Penning October 15, 1q.86 Page '3 ESCtktATEC+ DlIiEOTIONAL DIS IEUTI4IJ -- = SUBAREA 46 TRt ii FjC^ Z. tN00irr4iAL :PAAK -ARrM EN7.0F MOTGIt VEklCLES s To end treev*eCn}t Firenbtpe r-- 5 Taand frgm thoZWth 25 25 t Tuturdfrgf,,th out J� 25 To eqd from tht west 25 I Tow 35 25 t The ' morr ing peak - hour ° rnd afternoon ea assigned to the arterial and lou straet ttetworkrar;d�dc Volumes s}were Subarea 16. In Figure t ate the'e5ttmat_d volumes of Subarea 16 trYfric at the coca[ s ;reetiarteridl sweet and driveway /arterial street' intersections. According t Mr. lo Fast e twaygeau, C ty of Rdnchu Cuc?r�nonga Traffic Engineer, eacc h Iota[ tret would hm� a 44 -foot -wide roadway within a 66 -foot -wide rig�tt.or -way with ,.ocre travel Lane and ortf pa,# iwi lane in each dcectio, Fhe two-lane .tross sections woulu each have a:capatity of 1,200 vehicles p'rhour, total in both directions. 1_ higher: two.,�ry traffic volumes w4;'.'. bt an esumatcd' 530 vehicles the afternoon peak hour on the local str;etrri, th s+f Fourth Street. That vollmn would require, -)nly 44 percent o the sir -t capacity, which would r Su(t in operations at trust of s."Vice A. the best level, The vclumeson the other local streetis and an the driveways would 'he lower, and art of those facilities also would operate at level o: service A. TO accommodate the lcft,tt -n demands at the local street approaches to the arterial streets, it is recornrnendrd that eich of those approaches fiavc twc Janes —ore for left - turning movements and one for right- .iirt+i ,g movements. The Wt -turn lanes should be 150 feat long s - ..50..45 SI %7Fi S j-- i5- 5 *-35 t5 X35 t5 ^3 it ' S^ I �, m . oo ; • a o 45 50-190 # CIOI +I—I95 — 100 fA4NTti STREET � L.Y �. TO SCAL£ l htUMBER fTF VEHICLES A10tn:nq Attemaon PeAk Hour Peak Aalr 000 .. _. O00 _ .. _ Peonosrr; I%kYel(Omen} $ttefi ORO _ IIU UU4�f . L ` FIGURC 1 T'A..lIC AN() ieaNllO�tAf10N * lNCJh(�!t AN61'laN..r Af `�q suaAREA 16 PEAK -H-)UR Yrj 1 fl.e 7771 i Mrs. C:;ral L, Pennino Oct ber.I5, 1986 Page.4 The addition 02. pes could be provided in one of two ways. 1, 1;'ithm the 44- foot-wide iota. street raadwa sides 'x a,rlistanice or a r. `Prohibihparking on both' ppruz;mately 350 feet from the arterialstreec Provide a 190 -feat -long Iefc turn lane, a C;0- fent-Iong averse curve, and a 140-fo� P Tang taper. 2• on the i�cal street t proach to the arteri;l2I street widen the roadway to `0 feet with eight -foot -wide sidewalk°, within the 66 -fout -wide, right -of- Way. Retain the parking on both sides, and provide the leftsu ' jnd transitions described above, t lane The chaice 1' f the configuration to — discussions ions :used should be dereririneU in w� h Cicy offl" i?is: and staff m4mbers. ifyovhavc�'n y questions or common s, please contact us. We woujd' e- pleasd to d�seuss our "r-iings with City staff>mambers, if Yoe, cl sire. Very truly yours, r DONALD FRIScHERII &45SPCIATES 6onaid rrisciser, P. S, DF —ALK /r cc: Donald D. Steffensen I� w ,iiSOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCRP CUCAMONGA PLANNING CO MISSICn APPROVING DEVELOPMENT'.DcVIEW NO. C5 -37 FOR A MASTER Pt,AN LOCATED AT Tile `NORfA ST QUAORANI OF 4TH STREET, AND ARCHIBXL-V - VENUE IN THE INDUSTRV,'_'PARK DISTRICT WHEREAS, on „the' lst day of'April, 1987, a complete eppiication was filed by Keith Co. for review of the above - described project; a (e WHEREAS, on the 8ttvday or April, 1987, the Raocho Cucamonga ; "l anning Commission held ,a meeting to consider: the above- described project and continued it to the May 13, 1987 regular`meeting; and WHEREAS, on the 13th "day a May, 1987, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held .,`meeting to consider this project. follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as SECTION 1: That thC� following can be matt 1. That the proposed ;-project! is co;asistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and_, 2. That the proposed use is in acc;?d with the objective of the Development Code ano'the purposes ..cif the district in which the site is l:,cated;,and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That this project will not create addarse impacts on the envirorxLen an at a Negative Declaration is issued on iW.,y 13, 1987. SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 86 -37 is appr,c. d subject to the following can tions and attached Standard Conditions: Planning Division 1. The Master Plan is approved in concept only and future dev,-lopment for each parcel shall be subject to Develop--nt/ Oesign review process for Planning Commission ;_,approval. Modifications to thr Master Plan shall be subject to Planning Commission approval.'' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. OR 86 -37 - KEITHIEUSK COW.ANY May 13, 1987 Pae2 9 Z. Landscaping along the entire frontage of Archibald Avenue and 4th Street shall require detailed landscaping and. irrigation pla s to be submitted 1'�or Planning and Engineering Division revew and approval prior to recordation of Parcel Map 10393 and shall be completed in conjunction with the infrastructure improvements. 3. OVeloper shall dedicate an easement, in sufficient size of area as deterusined by the City Engineer and City Planner, for the mailor Gateway monument identity sign to bar -built by the City at thei intersection of Archibald Avenue and 4th Street. Developer shO l coordinate landscaping with this City beautification prcW,'ect. 4. A Uniform Sign program for the entire Master Plan shall be provided and subject to City Planner review and approval. 5, The site planning guidelines shall include provi) ions for shared access according ' to the City Access Policy and Dttsiga Guidelines. 6. Special design consideration in areas of bu „ding massing and landscape t"eatment shall�'be provided to tire. corner of 4th Street and Archibald Avenue 'As it is the Gateway to the City.. Conce0tuai plan /sketches shall be included in the Master Plan and to be submitted for Design; Review Conmittee Review and Approval. 7. The revised Master Plan text incorporating the above Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to recordaV-- of Parcel Map 10393. Engineering Division 1. Development of this sl to shffl be subject to the conditions of Parcel Map 10393 and any other conditions as necessary based upon the review of specific development: proposal within the site. APPROYGD AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF MAY`, 1987. PLA,4NING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: arry c i e , ;, a rman�'�"� ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy secretary C .�' L x PLA10.I U 00th X*`, a0NI` Ri�'QLUTION No. OR 95 XT - KEIRHtLbSK COMPANY Nay 13, 1987 Page S S, Brad Buller, De uf�r Secretary of., th Planning Q ission of the City of ,rancho Cucamonga, do herei y cvti r'y that the foregbiiig Resolution riass duly and regularly, introduce j paused; and adopted bv- .th0-Pla ning Codwiss on of the - -_ City of Rancho Cu, ong'a, at a regular meet�6g of the Panning Commission held on the Dtn.day of Kay, 3987, by,'the follq'ling vate -to -grit; u AYES: CO- M!!l'IS#C -NERS; NOES: COi�iMISI'NERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: �f :I I i i a rii.4 �:C ^Ny C OO �tl W: Quu CYM� LaOyC �daLLi 6�'G LL' UG6 �O�N YY d1 6�1y� Yy.. Q.0 i.9a ./ 4y t. CO�b 4 _ COa.4c Ce Y1 p 'oai A �O.q�Ci RlrJ, �ps Orl^ YNy4 �� Ldp. ,�f�, pOpy�,..0 i 14C�0 O � Q�nOOCEr =�l,Y 6b�pr: O�O ��4LL. LL it YNCy'�y �1 rl Er o $^ nnNN $gdd :.t.. LLa�oo �LL I °d�'Ne_ o - a�EiE'ae�aa ■YpA�Y � a'rS ay.� p c' ^ ca aL r ° ^Fie' -V'4 N . g lt� f e..�`r F$iauo nc �" ne,�nij ou :;zx c4 N.X �.Y� $ � oyorX -= .� pvG�ayy.F 6rY +6SS2M�. 2+ w~ p�i.0 mr: CYwls -2Mr i` .L ONM. r•L G. LOU l 1 T N 1 r J '!l J � O i 14C�0 O Al U O µ.nn r i Mt MO.q `6'N A Y C f sCY O O iri CW � as als. 4 gYCOycCC`�o�o"'v O n� Lbt f g4y3 VC 1 r J '!l Ay 11a 215 AY Tt i; L+• Y.A V fr «w. yT a c �c.a c -. �Y: o.+ ycy Y $q°^.ug`Y+YiS =�.a +ra4� ^°`q.L° �b a« 1I «�.°- ado ? N q L p$C y. �n pY yQ 6Ln J: H �' p0J V v Y a y agBuYC _Y MyN }��$� �•.OGN Tdw� LLfrpyyM�<C'YN.?€ �" U L�i4 a3.N N _ 6LLLp ^� Li. ^■ M Y p OAI M UOO L R? 4 L M rr 4 w M NLNO �N L t•s `s. ag^'V ?Cy'.°1_V „3jVU W G C.V N O Y L a i q■ N.ati b V aY �..0 �. °ar « L Lli Z..:.�U. g' 9r Y u aY"3" ' $"yes Y 79✓7� �"on.eu 2a i -qYa -Si l' Y¢ py ,:.E. K=i mZ qyg i viOL �p NmFt q.°c.°CU NGC�cN waPj h'9 j.�, -�A'V V J ayote aj.. pC S t. ;; M N S y, iyI Q S clo C L L c^C R A■ O g tl« R Ir Jqa W g � e u V q�� C O K� h `� �tw '¢O �• O C yL� LCACN n+HgGV �FdS gV« >YYN�W 4C�O4MVG6I +YS IF l CN ni.VC 'Vu«�3 4 Qyy L�G� C b @rpLp'Sgi � L .� N Syt1 C =y _ O� Y.Y p »o'[l 'pq CaMya� M+U^C V°V pYp g 925AL CC LwEE 4°.w 6V U+{OO{ O =2 CAYC SAO 4 CiG, KNVV NL "N6 T][N VV K M WL oR �u$,.N,v r��y 69 R�O` MLL s9 � Q3� OMb iY �W Yio Ua°i YF miuv. ZITP ga., 1�n Y4 Limi .rG.4 P:� G4 �I'_CL LYNN t •isr O'uer y pK �. � 6 im 0r4 �a i O O V •V GqA Y�$� O4 J�[ cG L3�Y`=�V�T uayQ��no Et. G N.Vd 4Y �19 E.1-9 S"% SA� P.a•°� &•.� PO b.�enF �o C.r„yTaGww' �.N -yp• P att °'a o`e�i a iJ A 'rt C uu E y. . v -z . v 6� p E q `u na c n'L �Oy LL. qL J ^qL yur V�� Y,,,a �6 r.0 w NT9 L�diy a` LG C pS X C ye 6^; 0.4r CLLy q1 ��Uyy � COOr «� FCV ��YCC L=4CNV U11p� d a °YY�N. A F NCC�T UAc a «aaSV .gtY� F a «VOcaN w.1 G�W C °C ,ti dgo a ed yA> Oao O�° cCf�1 PLCL+! C�yy�N q C V40 VAd �lr. CaV YV��.' dam•.` Vp �.�.... .0 9 N U f. ` C�k..GnG.^ * Si u Y Sid 4 L� S? O Y d 4 µ i v l E a C 43 ST e zz y .:.uu y! ^o «x♦,, N. c'° i�YO.clw6;2.9ng ^o��i JY Ly.9 p rdiy p p.rOX.—.84 . y N Y�YM W ��1p�Cf g Opp �C LYE a1Z� yCL iOpp.Y °Y .L CC L�1A C S, w CYNYIC •� Yd'Y �uq � w'..YV.y 'i vryO�aVV .�L -� V�a N'O �.N. Y`d pac V }! 0U V O C F`N �m. +y�jm +e�y �p��O AT' 'O y♦ON LAJ M q N YYGtQrofy 3G. NSx , tl 0 6d V C °`A d�f)1i� LST, Cq L <'1i S ■Y � �qU< ice. � �y:.'C Ky V LggP�YWNNCY CY G•<rr Es �.�g� o Ml ^ c N .K w _ e u< p ro r N a N S. +a ze 6u hro _ w.. O�tu ♦•C V� °qq C.Y. Y LYdQf Ya6N V >MYq N GY` E LY p " Y} ` ny' °�pfl ±C 1�t Ci�C {�M 'Y4y V YF� ,yy`� Y. � i W� .<. g G � q � N g ° � N ^ OR � N N 4 .I �K i `•' ; Y d N Y °~ O ..[ A Y `O c k 6 1► , V y Y 4 ef•� L I4Gt GN YO i�" °1 N.N+pV O.P r.YU YQ �.'A.R C Tp�M Y d g d �.< CWc'g Y•q••q•OI >T N d dV Zw= QV WOw ON 1 m a s•` q c ^ 4 L W G ^tl $- cS` Y rV°r g Qq u� KC�`BIiC RR �lg A,o yro %� qq S ^- A° E� Yd,pTrp C _ ° °L q Nc r Ny q Yu O X10 Rp N y y�� ^6ro tl Y L •- Vy . n L6? g ppr Y y'.7 Edo N N d�VJ iI N w.igr pd� r YYY Y � O6! C N d L �:� T} gL��y+q d CC �L V E<I dWLp.0 Pd —gin c uao ♦ mroL e..a °� tls CYC� m.q+q osL� iq._ d.�L°; _rode cQ. dq♦°ia RO °i N S�• L <yg �' C tl oo^ E `Tl N L d� < 3 u o ` a �q cocN r nC °uT AS Y9 pC� rou L �M ° t�+Ve • n NNoY y O N 6 n p- S 4roN f r' �`*.'.� 4rt.N <Nw. Y <1.. CO 1'•'O V°i�c 604 <w4 V W66aii#n�1♦°- N La 0 1 �t SOY € ° Y - i�1+ T6 Lpp V; ND�4 LLUiiV ¢Z .. Y o H ppi 4C C Ug L«g . Y�e ire° a�+. c�.4 `4`Fw R4i � ^ / Z N YGi16KO1 eeNN uw °9 ^L it l - RqL aNl° , 6 d i H Q + _ d V^C I'+ . W1 cj AO C • J ' O N y wU ; ^ N .. «■ F C urie 4 s■ w U p O g H • y aL . + KH+.L Y4.R I Y �O}6 NLG n « n+ M L� e° �L �2 Q Ebl 60s3y mRy 9. !r FEO QV NC 4�sOC w�4. Oq ��l0u {.�q�6 aNa.�•�p =OCSI 0 0q Yuq. �.. 46 G y� AOM. S� Y D•Uj «OL,� °L ;q.V Y 24 � a^ o °_ a � cO.__�M.. 15. R Y V«`'S° CC •�9- «,21 C +vye d . � d° C �4 p ` Y 4 +x iBLUJ Q � Y�.yq•�+ N V4 Y t9 y' y ne €.4, aa4g � ni0 qo�0. y +.pm ai. q +Mr ° VEi 7 e H nb 4 LaGiq a �r +c a4 O.r � Vz: 1 «i Fez �� HE J II1 S w `oae lax ab+U+ G� wY sq. Y 0 9 +kL • UyYj « c �V� �' ny. �. v°g¢��$ �'�.4L. nc � A a � o •n u uve •aC� FpCw Vuri" +orD uQ9 �� > •ia��> 4. �`IL ^y9 s t q L a ■s-yy q «Q�_ e ^ v. s CCu EYq c. $ cd'}°e cc °ov sqN • nL + iy q spy �N e °r.GCU C °� �1.� YY N r de e«YE Y MYLC n0 at 4 � � .y.. VI+ �•= N C �� N ^ t+` Y scpnN Sm.y -N Ca °Y.L q> e y ,,:Z `L ,, EMi A T•r OC' N .'-2N NYO �= 4 °. M 12-2 C° V ,°q N« a .. '° r °aI.CC O1 a °+ Y 'v'u= N'°"�` y, LNL j N C N L w. D1 ° q ` N O� V+ • C O °� i� 1 Or t T� LL Y t Y N N � rt hi lam.' 1 CJ F LJ W a Y100 \ \VYIW ��W. �C I � _YOC yp$G g a �� tGN�Ya�.i Y�1� � L u '•�p47Lj G L ^' 4O Y'0� �i'G O Vi° LN�'4 4 OY $ f^ iF �,t o:...... i v E ° L a. 5 of at i �, T -4$ H CC« 4aM�Pt0p OC. QL w wr • Nii ..°� a°+ $ $ s° � q uN.NLF a9 f x buy rOf fi..V6 0.4 ttQ 1 it �f �L 80 �� 'yL' ` ��`yy I��Y •��1 yyy{f{ YMM� ^Y�� f$�pf,� .. ba $66o Sg a�..'P.¢F�MeMy$.r�.s. =�° u $ 4 'Zr &N 'O�wf�ri 9S ~% bq 1Yy q0.0 s 3 1. ~ ��y }jY Mvf �yLp`^N i.0. �p. i06P CCCCL.`� r g LfM�ySCL. C 11 it I Ili, r� .vx Yo ��" a�'` ►� jig iz � oQR�� i � �fp�U 9y �94 N a� ^.p YV 4f nµn C.L M� nOCaa i,Q4c°C�. 4GY�pW L yy+VeiCvi " ' 9 Y 4 - « at WM� IN YY �6 Y�Ri Cy,. ��•4 p� OPII wJJ - \�Y 0 11 °. :.g ►3 «r ;wE +.'. >'° YY E Q pC CN v' CN 4 �u .es �n0.n� uWC.tL�l C n. L]aMMC Ca yy o N �oS `pD tuxt 6 Q G j..CV ,I N ♦ �L,� 1YN gu q,'y Y N L� �N ►� M Cw N Qpp O. p � Z 41k y� {Ny,., 2 72 N �' yCO a `p 1 N C7 -.O L Ly 1E .�.^ v °.v �a �S ~ AQ. i xQ ir•vGi j,.G ui O ° 'Q sg' X A -8,5 .— ten` "t Y{1 ti L� OI �COA � YAL tit � n�Y �� do O V tln4 p a OM o.� ► Y y O 6 :=.W ` n Cc E ► W S ?a O T y C L� A +] V 4 L 9 0 q V V Q p! i YT O► CA'ii► ,C _ SSW N'n t_ "La's rl! �► 1.L S S W VyY� �Ni tbN _ T C + _ Y ■C U ~� u OYS 01Y9 C +•�y�1�� OCCC dQ `�lLL. '`� V M • V.r» Y_qxy C YGS �.0 4 Fc yyV NJ��Y L L d �i E ++ Y L L Q ! 1: L C O Y c C G Y. NO 6 ►n 6V �� WaIN LO..0 3.6 "�N Ylol CGN N � �) 0f Gf of of ..I ►f .+f �f � .. �tf ( f f i 2~ « d N S« a=r R :R g o L a e v., s iii o Trw 1 eN Q Z N -nO u c, n z iJ iw q.N ►O e >.e: np` Q yy ^ e OCN Nip^Yy _ ° -y yO S Y Ot� Y p N L Ct: Y NN NUq NM �` Y Y 3 IN I CL NY M «O� S« Un3 v., s iii o Trw 1 eN Q Z N -nO ir> �YS.v n z iJ iw q.N xi RYn >.e: np` "Ne ypS OCN Nip^Yy _ ° -y yO S Y Ot� Y p N L Ct: wQ -y 4NU H6W 6.2 <g �` Y I t0 �� yy 4 av ea � ro 4 7 d � � • d L N Y- - tr. V yV 44 k I ` 444 F c.. 3ga �: g2 C i gigs 9 AX Z yySaF _C Y Y MLtl e L 0Y VT E CN— CC r�i�,t— E Ca 9CC M� YIX i ^Y �l� 'E p4 09A u C4CwY oVp NCOpp$ C O q�tY..�. LO Y Cr YSr-4. 4 1 ,29 O C i L COY Y�O CCYG � IaO� ((tti SN �„�4� ''M DYE•^.. dV.. OS CO o • i9u.wp, V� L.. -o3 14i 1. n CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT, DA'rE: May 13,"A487 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning - Commission FROM., Brad duller, City Plainer BY: Debra Meier, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMEkTAL ASSESVENT AND -DEVELOPWNT REVIEW 86-43 H.T.I. GuHziTRLK;TI0N- -- The gevewpmemv or a multi-tenant' ridustrial bU1101 -1 totaling 38.458 square feet on 2.5 acres of landAn the General'Ind"trial District (Subarea 11, located on the north east corner of 8th Street .and Baker Avenue - iLPN 207-271-01 RELATED FILE: VARIANCE 86-09 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION, A. Action Requested; Approval of site plan and building 3TFY-aflons and lss ance of a Negative Declaration. 8. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North-- Santa Fe-Rai I road,--WarehoutA; Distribution; Industvial Specifir-P14n (Subarea ;I) South - Single 'Y residential, C1 I ty of Ontario East - Welding s6l,-Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 1) West - Vacant land'."-Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling unite per acre) C. General Plan Designat�4nqs: Fro -J5c-t-STt-e--- genera 1 Ind strial North - General Industri al South - City of Ontaric East - General Indu:�trial West - Low Density Residential (2-4 dwellin&,-units per acre) v. Site Characteris4ics: The site runs approximately 1,300 feet 7r—om Baker venue -Meast and is only 70 to 80 feet in depth along the 8th Street frontage. The site -mopes northwest to soutLldst at a 3% gradient. ITEM M �� i � � �� ® PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 86 -43 - H.T.I. CONSTRUCTION May 13, 1987 °age 2 E. Parki 4 Calculations: Number of Number of Type - Square Parking, Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ranto Required Provided Multi- Tenant 38,458 1 /400 96 105 II. ANALYSIS; A. General: This will be the second phasC3 of a -ulti- tenant oriented facility along this block. Phase I (approximately 250 feet of phase M Is recently completed and occupied. Phase II will be consistent with Phase I in architectural details, site planning, and landscaping. B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Chitiea, R1c e , and But I er ) recommended approval of the proposed site plan and building elevations with the Condition that the accent stripe be continued on the rear elevation of the first two buii'dings easterly- from Baker Avenue. The applicant has incorporated this {n revised plans. Afth C .ichrsical Review Committee, The t =hnical Review Committee has ariewa project,, an determined that with recommended iondit ons of Approval the , project -is consistent with applicable City Standards and Ordinances. 1 r:xis" ng overhead utilities are located on three sides of this araject: 8th Street, Baker Avenue, and along the railroad. The frontages along Baker and tic_ railroad are less than the w2nimum required for undergrounding, and the properties across Baker Avenue and North aF the rail' road are mostly undeveloped,- therefore, the developer' is being required to pay a standard If one half in -lieu fee. The portio:a along 8th Street is being required to be undergrounded. In fact the developer is being required to extend the undergrounding an additicnal 250 feet to the east fo complete the entire ptrtion from Baker to Vineyard. The undergrounding condition has a provision included alloying that the developer be given a fee credit against the other two frontages for the additional undergrounding along 8th Street. D. Environmental Assessments Upon review of Part T_ of the Initial i a study and complution o art II of the Environmental Checklist, staff has fou +.d no significant environmental impacts related to the development of this project. PLANNING CO3t4I SST¢Ci -fAFF REPORT OR'86 -43 - N.T.L. CONSTRUCTION May 13, 1987 Page 3 s III. ,ACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the Industrial j., -specific Plan anr the General Plan. The project will not he detrimental' to`" adjacent properties or cause significant environmental impacts. In addition., the proposed site plan and building design, tggether with recommended Conditions, are in compliance with thelkInd(istrial, Specific Plan and City Standards. ,I IV. RECOMMENDAT -iON: Stuff ;,rmotAends approval of Development Review 8b°43__tffirougTY— adopif64 a, the attached Resolution and Conditions of Approval and issuance of a Negative Declaratidn. r Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner }. e BB:DM•ns Attachments: Exhibit W Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan l' Exhibit "C" Typical Landscape Plan Exhibit Resolution �' of Approval withaConditions i AMMOR TOWEKA SANTA FE R.K Lu Vic M- F- '-ft tt 1�1a6Cy �Ne[:M� w:a lwn M S> +rmMgyle r. -.'11r lae Z JK MtrtY• aT... Q f, 7z =41;. Z5 SFACIM - ®wewaa..m.. G6a+ - i CITY 0r r r r. _ RANCHO CUCAM PLANNING DIV r1 -�" C /Sccau'c • { r pullc�alGi .ti � � 1 1 j Is, uIL 94 spy {�j ; s=.u�.eE 1� • . ; ., ,. • • • ,. -. .•. , \ .�. ... , GDS Peso sc N Lac -wrt . s ceuopy'Tzac CITY Of. RANCHO CUCArvioNGA PLANNING DIVSM FXHIMTI.- 10 SCALD c)1 f f {t k d+aR4�erw (wuy r K] E. v .> CITY or- S CUCAMONGA r" PLANNING 1 ) i x. RESOLUTION AO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCWMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 86 -43 LOCATED AT THE ° NORTHEAST CORNER OF 8TH STREET AND BAKER AVENUE IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT - APN 207- 271 -ai�, WHEREAS, on the 8th day of April, 1987, a complete application vas filed by HTI Construction for review of the above- described project:; and F WHEREAS, on the 13th day of May, 1987, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning .r Commission held a meeting to consider the above - described project. follows- NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as SECTION 1. That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed =iroject is consistent with the objectives of the Industrial Specific Plan and the General Plan; and 2. That the ro os'ed use is in accord. with the objective of tha Industrial Specifi,c'Platt and the purposes of the district in whicn the O to is located; and 3. That t{te proposed use is in compliance with, each of the applicable:.,rovisions of the Industrial Specific Plan and the Development Code;. and 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environmen an at a Negative Declaration is issued on May 13, 1987. SEUION 3. That Development Review No. DR 86 -43 is approved subject to the fo ew7lin9 conditions and a ?tached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. The building elevations shall be similar to Phase One Eighth Street Industrial including heavy sandblast finish to all south, east and west elevations. W, Resolution Flo. Development Review 8543 May 13, 1987 Pane 2 r� 2. The first two` °1buildirigs east of Faker Avenue shall be i - andblast, finished and kceive a,A accent stripe similar co that provided on the south elevations. ENGINEERING DIVISION I. Existing Overhead Utilities a. Baker Avenue - An in lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of existing overhead utilities (eliictricai) or. the project side of Baker Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to the .issuance of building permits. Tne fee shall be one -.half the adopted unit amount times the length from the center of the A.7. & S.F. railroad right -of -way to the tenter of 8th Street. b. An in -lieu fee or a lien agreement as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing railroad related utilities along the north property fine shall be provided prior to the fssuance of building permits. The in -lieu flee or lien agreement shall be one -half the amount as determined by the-A.T. & S.F. Railroad times 4he length of the property from the centerline of Baker Avenue to the east project boundary. Adak c. .8th Street - The exi ling c0rhead utilities f (telecpmmunication) on the project side of 8th Street shall .,be undergrounded along the entire project fs frdntage from the first pole existing or. the west side of Baker Avenue to include all remaining utilities to the east (approximately 250 feet offsite to the east) prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. In addition, the telephone line which extends southerly from the intersection of Baker Avenue and 8th Street shall be undergrounded to the first pole south of 8th Street or rerouted. Reimbursement one -half the a6pted cost of undergrounding fium future development as it occurs on the opposite side of the street is not feasible because the property is located in the City of Ontario. d. The developer shall be given a credit towards his in- lieu fee obligations for the cost of•undergrounding the additional telepnone lines along 8th Street to the east of his project. 2. A permit from the A.T. & S.F. railroad is required for any grading within its right -of -way. r i 5r, 77 Resol uti or. Zl'a. Development Review 8643 May 13'. 1987 3,f Page 3 3. Notice of intention to ,Form and /or join the Lighting and Landscapiktg - District shall be filed with the City Council prior to recordation of the map or issuance of building z permits, whichever ,occurs first. 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF MY, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ` BY: Larry 1. McRiel, Chairman" ATTEST: F a ;;' Brad u, , er, pu y : Secretary F f h I, Brad Buller, 'Deputy Secretary of the Planning ;Commission of the City of ' regularly anct introduced, a,s a s� regular meeting Aoregoing { "��tTution was duly and -, Rancho_ Cucamonga, do hereby certify that t',se f the Pl�.n; j Co�jasion of the of the Ply, "ng C�issien held on the 13th day of May, 1587, by the following vote -to-wit» AYES COMMISSIONERS: NOES; COMMISSIONERS: 'r; ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: O I �i 7 9.. d 3+CY�° UDUY�..Y>i, yLOiO S� V� �G Nqa Yc .� C"yN9 Vw IIgYO y�q�l q� OQ�ww _ {y. Y C aQ n II 8° -.n C G q 4 ur w OL L p y pyQT a =�o�v qy a��NC o °.wN. 6r"��goqi Ya,e oe,��a ■ CYANJOyV +q�'Y� Q�� Nyn� II�u �L�M$ q ��QaQi$up. °S YYLL =q=. � L�Eyp CVO a'3 4'� tt i,N, U 7�YL O`II`V�a Y't� - nN a YYY 'i E'oN la q,p fE�G1Y L"' �Qp LC eP Y. +' �ati G •° r��L. *u�Y` 'Li<Q�OY�a°C C: EQ G:M i�L G.Ctly Nqa 4-SN��9 pc 444�3iii Q.uNU 4 Q $C IM t gwc0 _ i y �IICy aVaJ �C, .YG 4C� u OO E0 �8H Y �� fig cx S Qr� .5'�y QY'2 L6Yi9 6i} �`CC �vO eVp� ■n �.� � qN ZUG `�� p.Jrr 6Q yVG "y Vb �C 1�p�.0��' �CC VK ECG^" ay� Sq .� GGgy NNL+.r R Q aQ.�g Y Q Z;8. yy�vCC ttYY $ yYvV ppo,_pyp� ttn. €pu vM 6'OV l� CG Y M Yq caN CYM iy'w �}y ` <6.1� Yuri 1'. AU. } t� i m CCQ� �GL°'q�YrC ,,1 pg9 y2 � N C q ✓ E P >6 ai �CCI MDa Y>r °+ V 1 p NNW N q p y,$'y eyC M u F ii (G�.. NYq Y N •t E � �IIY 99t Q o O Op f4 L.w Ql�'^a o e Isiz L U U s V Jy �4� 14� N 4 < Y 6p H� '� Ri } t� i "• .A. �.c m Gv n� RY i. A • v >u.. .�Y �'�+.ap,� ap S Y Yi p c l tiyt p. VNGLN4 •O�A�. O• Nya : °iop ��". (�1 ^°.�'o, ��>. i.att '�sn y ��i$ .°+$. Z Rte: r. jEn..� '�Y iya `�J01N U.Y 4y -Ox =Y YAGE�Ea rzar � GF.rb+ «a V CpC Ct 1;:. 7. Cod �M UdiAEt �N'Q LLI ° _t O cz °L =,a o�9E $'•+o�'#`.`a ~ `v::� E �$N Nip °° wy —. ^m..�s X Z' wp SbwYA do ° .. �L $.iib ► ►° r^b. N$yOd ua p,9. Cba� iy6s CGYR O �.L4r.y:Y tS o�'paCf�r°r .N„E�:'� M p�.M ^8■ Oiq �G` YS • � A r C �O p • � � � y U ° • p y ^ � � T _N 2 '� � � � � p `' w°. N ' V N. S �w p N fY N CC �f ti c 8 C Lf Ca cqr if '`O R � ._Y rOy`d. YC �AO.G�E{� O C YuuLe'iu ` a ` � �TnCY .�dt L `S O � aO i } Y Y� 9' s q a— U. ' if -0, YY 93 L b _ 12 -K Wrys 9Q Vpp G Y -CE A N6� Q6.✓6 G'NYY. N�.NNL�IINYY tl N b Iz ° L; 1 N 1 �'q ae e. gum ..Y." c v ¢p. �ci =ai ^.r.— y `or. ••o gad+ 6Q QYd w�A GCCp GO. gr �L 6L`OV2` UO Yh L_� rN Get4L YS j`.y ^t y L � 0 ys} OfQ�4R�_�.aj GM.�M BULL �n. D C ! CC 4 6FyAN . yd4 S `• d Y C �SNC A� Y 4S 6O 00 G�Y44y�, L.�Y O`�:VO yob NV uri C`:q r bC� Gf= -f '6 =� rCI L... . u L y"L y X7, Nan Pu uLd d C y M u T a a E L C bCC U yV - pi 3 Y T I ZEE $— L# E O Qpp �G�,j' cna u +yx >b PG 9CO$ —Y b.°�.py CNWLni c °mac de Yva -SC. S9` �.d Weo a�x;`g`NR vCClgp .°. v�r�dcE ... ."��CN tq 4.+N '�yaO. CND t 6 GHEE C4 pTCy o.�_�Y 9. �C'OdS y6 O L? ^'i3 °a.�u i� .Qd LVVO G Op G�.� p06 9Ccq d„O.ti r°r d 2 J i pp pp @y a O'�1d O r 4 09k�Oyp, �d Y 4�1YN a`p��° Cie 6t3 r !-r NG Q.°.Na No Kd .°a�CY C.Y Y�� M�YNG��.1 -.C6C 6L I .YY v Va Ell LIZ .N .Camay Ya NQL .°-o g r' qYe r,,a� Ny fgR� w C N C � yw ,� Nr u =•y, w y L a p. pgprQ ✓G'gu1 L L 9 L >^ 4r 4 R y G a 3 pu�A LV�r dre ND 6A.�ip >R Y� N Lp ytl�pc � y °•+ V R `�aLi� N b jN D 2 = 1 u a DD Y Y�i. Z. :s eti.a .Day cO pe `�RC ry. yYyi� N S Vy 9Yj0 P C 6L i N�. Lw aN+ DU 1 GDS y u d. p4 N N 1 V i o c Y N u u o peyr ✓YU p� C. 4xy4L KCn IV CN CG 6V HOn�w U aD+n 6aL�R� Ly. a�4ag iYlu N °��p SCag €s p v� a. Y Q V ► t a {r4. vy ^IL AL R C1 Yy GOj .s w. ��`° avYCC�$ Nr m4 y.Y. •N•v NcV'�y��a V�� l�U�N L •N A'�Lw I, !° p K K Gw WN p�N�wp. 6 C C OAS. t � : : / ^� p pLU O O�y. C �a=sq,t c c L LY�i tO � CCO Y C V wpp Gt • N I In G ' ' 6 C CCY � ..� -... �U.. A]yGp � � C V iu Oy 1 1 u C r LlO a� R R 6 uA 16 C ay 4 O+L+AyI t • Y pi4't f f' U �OpLC ^ Y'�.. (- O C C C q qc p UyN � ^.r R R V wT. SL p pN p py N NGCUC� c��' N RO4u PYOV N NYx S ZZ NOar a a9 R wpCCC q qY� 4 4a ^ ^�'.0 Y Y� O O�pg�a06�yD4i� a �� L �' auflLO�4 � LN � ti�''M y ypy40w Y pN u Y ph D D Y Y�ryyLi pNy Cow 4 4Y. Y6 N N9p1 � �ppf+L. LN .O1A M M V y y4 L Li G np.0 V N. D F F S n nY••y �.. wp. Ir I If a31 t tf�. t ti ' C p p�R/ { uO p yV NU! x C A ACC }1 6µ uWy �l pp [ 6Nq r [[" u u Q Y`p N Q C Up ■t +p C C C r ` C 6 N�NRN K KNw I I/N S SND 1 1�MS t MV M ;A� d I II[� M `UC$•�L Ell LIZ .N .Camay Ya NQL .°-o g r' qYe r,,a� Ny fgR� w C N C � yw ,� Nr u =•y, w y L a p. pgprQ ✓G'gu1 L L 9 L >^ 4r 4 R y G a 3 pu�A LV�r dre ND 6A.�ip >R Y� N Lp ytl�pc � y °•+ V R `�aLi� N b jN D 2 = 1 u a DD Y Y�i. Z. :s eti.a .Day cO pe `�RC ry. yYyi� N S Vy 9Yj0 P C 6L i N�. Lw aN+ DU 1 GDS y u d. p4 N N 1 V i o c Y N u u o peyr ✓YU p� C. 4xy4L KCn IV CN CG 6V HOn�w U aD+n 6aL�R� Ly. a�4ag iYlu N °��p SCag €s p v� a. Y Q V ► t a {r4. vy ^IL AL R C1 Yy GOj .s w. ��`° avYCC�$ Nr m4 y.Y. •N•v NcV'�y��a V�� l�U�N L •N A'�Lw I, !° p K K Gw WN p�N�wp. 6 C U aD+n 6aL�R� Ly. a�4ag iYlu N °��p SCag €s p v� a. Y Q V ► t a {r4. vy ^IL AL R C1 Yy GOj .s w. ��`° avYCC�$ Nr m4 y.Y. •N•v NcV'�y��a V�� l�U�N L •N A'�Lw I, !° p K K Gw WN p�N�wp. 6 C 6 C S.:AbQ.a ■:. a ^N NK 99 oiJ a �LU- d•.-.c ��a tea$ i�+ ` 9� a0e� ONy �•^n 9 �'OY -18 + E ,;; G O Gka i -zi V g•'G if N U° g" a 0y5 3 Ga•Jyx n`VV l� dW LJ d V 6 C U L oG °e Z {1� �pN.0 SNJyppyE v_O 6wLi LQ.N Np�pji RRs✓ a L :ui 7 O 09 6L ll V y' DRO YL Ot✓J Y Z ^G� Y-t5 CxCC y L �i y �p■ O�� wO C O ENEp � ■■5 d� V i _ V Ate^ _ NN Q t OygO yC `TC O.qqq�+� 9 5 a tp Q JG a• r 4 C N = C O Y <d� QYN.•. �g N `O 9 Q SEC. `.d�V q CC 9 VC r N V ` Y Q V t VppOl NT.G C E' i L d I S u vsa.. y � ;► rd'a !2z S.:AbQ.a ■:. a ^N NK 99 oiJ a �LU- G Q N�� ce Q 010. fur$5yS Q C A.6u L¢^ 9� � ONy �Ny. 9 t : g" a z' T L_L M oG °e L °xv u NJ �QVE �pN.0 y� qV' ^L4Y 6wLi LQ.N Np�pji A o ^CN L C �NL O.q C 4 d 4 9L� C JLE- > yYNO CxCC 6U N Cq�� .�. C_9 SC ou =n �yG +y yya uQ� ■�i $o LU Vr5 yy. O.N .�Ypp qquu 4v..y 9 Gl J�YV 7Cy 0.9 OCyyV, yy� � �� Y¢p V N'�OW ly d OY x,.. L Y. �QYrO V�.�6. 1NL1 ��W� •�CC{�N t��p N H SV� UV S MdLpp pC ��yp` x Ya ^uC .^ rL+Y 4 x9 6. v L�.I Ui N G c V u ^ L¢^ LLie N y 4.5 �Ny. z' T yy a(v 9 c^ � 6wLi LQ.N Np�pji A o ^CN C �NL O.q `` J•c «g 4 Q Yd > yYNO CxCC 6U N Cq�� .�. CC L d wO C O ENEp � ■■5 d� V i _ V Ate^ _ NN Q t OygO yC `TC O.qqq�+� 9 5 a tp Q JG a• r 4 C N = C O Y <d� QYN.•. �g yTy y tuES `O 9 Q SEC. `.d�V d' A� q C 2 H V tit ^3 R- �" Was rNe'�, LC .g13 wv `C car n. s.. 517, k. �. v IL s u tj vyw �)SCy at ` C ^ ^= :,1;4! w +�L', L V Y C Y 4 .1 s KOii .KQ�oQ H. 9 Y C Y c Y yyey 4p ^.1°. W py tL^ Ay qqCC+ ` t��r yOy LC Q IfN,OYV� nLa °A p0 ." Chu b SY °O a .. ci�=IIM�r 0�4C1�y u s+ su Cr ■■pp° •-. S� 8O�' 3{yp. Ci.'�'4 3x'$ E �{ {tea $ T —r Nb i�` q g V. ZI Y P G^ O Y Y '4x p� y0 aG °H09 � N qp Y q + M �t ✓ LL M Yy G 49�aLA Y 11 11 6.Y W CLO C` . M 11 a. 0 A ^ ypOgt V >. C.V g�onL 44 ZR Y 4 J 6 >tp�r � Y RY _iF 2 r qN it�' O�ON �O:�SY E9 tz -g Ct s2l -A i wy� 7RN L ^ C GO al; O GV� MYM Y C Y V� 3 SNU NB�R�• �. 6W F. W 6 N _ U Ml F C 1 y pg r. i�rvsa g g cio c� 9 O ti • ti ti ti Y �. .�1 ti x N a. 0 A ^ Po o Q =u, �u�� g�onL 44 K Y 4 J 6 >tp�r � Y RY _iF 2 r qN it�' O�ON �O:�SY E9 tz -g Ct s2l -A i wy� 7RN L ^ C GO al; O GV� MYM Y C Y V� 3 SNU NB�R�• �. 6W F. W 6 N a L Er � NYO ]i1( ec no GNU n�; >e o Y ° Na Jam. _ Y� W LPN �Y y e ^ N y LEx s� yo NEE Ev+ Rs� Day y�" p 00 ~ O R� 0 U p qy� q ay�ii cy �. p Y Y IAN UW `p,y. 31 A ^ Po o Q =u, �u�� g�onL 44 vQ Cpp Y 4 >tp�r RY _iF d r qN it�' O�ON �O:�SY E9 tz Ct s2l -A i wy� 7RN L ^ C GO al; O GV� MYM Y C Y V� 3 SNU NB�R�• �. 6W -I— I I O 13 oV ACC n wYiCC LYC V OMB Ct YO u�O6 �QN � 494: Y N 9 ty�C �C • C p �y �np9p + ^may ~ Yom. VI O R. y D�L +Ly nY u p _ C S u A C y4 Q21z- ` q q M. Y L^ 4 4 O -s pC 9d,^a =Y R V� y^iC dyG CA a.r iC`q � U�Y 13- a z�F]5�y Y 8 .Liw Ski li � Au � _NO n NY ji .0 very `tj NCpp32a . AQOR Y rY Y AY V 76Oa O= r YA.L a ` NV GO.q O yM W Cy NO a Cq ^PqL C�Vb OI pN 112 N sqS $N' CLuYqi. Yom'.^ Yw+urr AH ppwi �::c .w- w�v'•i o.'e. o�'y N. �.. �.. o.Y. $� � i °e >�' +ine tNOu., '. i'CW IFF�� In a IH W A • N ^ • i c vo V e eo d y y M q Y Yr � O ri C .. O LW.. ycyei � > > N Chu b O b 1 13 oV ACC n wYiCC LYC V OMB Ct YO u�O6 �QN � 494: Y N 9 ty�C �C • C p �y �np9p + ^may ~ Yom. VI O R. y D�L +Ly nY u p _ C S u A C y4 Q21z- ` q q M. Y L^ 4 4 O -s pC 9d,^a =Y R V� y^iC dyG CA a.r iC`q � U�Y 13- a z�F]5�y Y 8 .Liw Ski li � Au � _NO n NY ji .0 very `tj NCpp32a . AQOR Y rY Y AY V 76Oa O= r YA.L a ` NV GO.q O yM W Cy NO a Cq ^PqL C�Vb OI pN 112 N sqS $N' CLuYqi. Yom'.^ Yw+urr AH ppwi �::c .w- w�v'•i o.'e. o�'y N. �.. �.. o.Y. $� � i °e >�' +ine tNOu., '. i'CW IFF�� In a IH W A • N ^ • 4 > CC f O ay. E F z Ujf > DATE: May 13, 1 -87 19 77 ro Chairman and Members of the Planning Comnissir-� FROM: Brad Bull--.)r, City Planner BY: Debra iaier, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL 'ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -12 GENERAL DYNAMICS - The - eve omen o a-F e. easuremen. 17-067.7y- cons ;a ing of three buildings that total 4,000 sgl.are .'feet oil 3.72 acres . of land in the General ;lidustrial District 10), located on the west side of Milliken Avenue south of the Atshison Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad tracks - APN 209- 272 -03. 1, PROJECT AND SITE DESC91PTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of site plan and building e eva ons an ssuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: or n us.r a ieses; 19THstrtial Specific Plan (Subarea 9) South - Vacant land; Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 10) East - Warehouse Distribution: Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 10) West - Vacant land; Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 10) C. General Plar. Designations: rolec Site = Generai I-n-ifustri.,-1 North - Heavy Industrial w South - Genera, Industrial East - Generaal Industrial West - General Industrial D. Site Characteristics: The site is being maintained as a vineyarr- or f—erosion control. The natural ground slopes gently to the south at about a 1% gradient. Milliken Avenue is a Special Boulevard and exists up to 7th Street, The continuation of Milliken Avenue including the overpass, will be a future Gity construction project. Access to the proposed firld measurement area will be via private roadway accessing Miiliken Avenue at the 7th Street intersection. TEM V PLANNING COhMI55I0N�;,,$TAFF REPORT OR 87 -I2 - GENERAL i }YRAMICS May 13, 1987 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The field measurement area is only a small portion of a much larger parcel owned by General Dynamics and slated for future Master Planning and development, This project xs.. a relocation of the field measurement facili y ex�s tng a e enera tics complex at-Tffe—sou-in SlaP OT orn Street at Utica Avenue. B. Design Review Comdittee :, The Design Review Committee (McNiel and Werdan),recommended approval of the project with only orle condition: the north and east boundaries of the sate should be landscaped with a double row of avergreen trees. The Canary Island pine should be used in combination with another variety of evergreen tree that provides additional, .screening capabilities yet maintaining the exisitng lardsc4e theme on the General':D+namics site which also utilizes 6nary Island pine, C. Technical Review Committee: Technical Review Corwittee has reviewed a proyec an etermined that it is consistent with applica4 ?.e Standards and Ordinances, D. Environmental Assessment: Upon review of Fart I of the Initial *Stucly and comp a ion of"Part II of the Environmental Checklist, staff has found no significant impacts related to the development of the Field Measurement Facility. III. TACTS FOR FINDINGS The project is co:sistent with the Industrial pee c an and the General Plan. The project wiltlz not be detrimental to adjacent,,, properties or cause significant environmental impacts. I »,'addition, the proposed project, together with recommended- Conditions, are in compliance with the Industrial Specific Plan and City Standards. IV. RECOMM €NDATION: Staff recommends approval of Development Review $7=12 t rougTi- the adoption of the attached Resolution and Conditions of Approval and issuance of a Negative Declaration. Resp tfuliy er s bmitted, Brad B l l City Planner BB••DM:ns W—,01 —,01 v a PLANNING COMMISItUR STAFF REPORT _ Uj x OR 87-12 - GENERAL DYNAMICS May 13, 1987 a` Page 3 Attachments, Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "'B" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "C" - Grading Exhibit "D" - Building Elevations Resolution of Approval with Zonditions ff k .kl LOT ii k. 4 .y u LOT if0; L r� N 1 ?AR 5 r+� sr�nrsr PAR -5 AMSMO CITY Or. rrcm, OR-07—/2 a RANCHO CUCArvIONGA mu, LAZ*rza 5W7, PLANNING DIVISK)N Al-Al FXHiit�% ,r� f rg f .. I f,. �� 5/Z?5-� , CITY OF Iran- jx 01- f RANCHO CUCAivio A Tnu— tom ok/ PLANN M, DIVEM EXHI[3Ci'. -19L LC. + Ji I : I. 1t II it CIPIT or ri , RANCHO CUCANja�GA MEN Trru, PLANNI,NC.,' L)IVEON EXHMM- (11 Alok L-y- 1, 4 SCALD NOR mom=., MEANEAMM A'3.$EMUY ff%&M CITY Of, rrEm. _d lam_ PLANN M, DIVEON EXHIW -9 . L0 RESOLUTION No. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEV LOPPINT REVIEW NO. 87 -12 LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF MILLIKEN AVENUE, SOUTH OF THE A.F. & S.F. RAILROAD IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT APN 209 272 -03. WHEREAS, on the 25th day of March, 1987, a corp;A eta application was filed by General Dynamics for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on 4he 13th day of May, 1987, the Rancho Cucamonga planning Commission held a m?eting to consider the above- described project. follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as SECTION 1. That the following can be met: 1. That .;e prniosed projects is celnsistent with the objectives of the Industrial Specific Plan and the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Industrial Specific Plan and the;, purposes of the district in which the site is located; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan and the Development Code; and 4. That the propo -ed uses, together with the condi tV `ts applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or mceerialiy - injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2. That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environmen a�i U-fTat a Negative Declaration is issued on May 13, 1987. SECTION 3. That Development Review No. 87 -12 is approved subject to the follow ng con tlons and attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. The north and east boundaries of the site shall be lando,caped with a double row of evergreen trees for proviing additional. screening capabilities. Another variety of evergree., tree shall be provided in addition to the City's required designated street trees of Canary Island pine and Camphor tree. N_q Resolution No. DR 87 -12 - General Dynamics r May 13, 1987 Page 2 ENGINEERING DIVISION t. AP offer of dedication (40 feet in width) for the north one -half of 7th. Street along the proiact frontage shall be required. A lien agreement shall be submitted for its future construction. The centerline shall be aligned with the centerline of 7th Street. 2. Milliken Avenue right -of -way and slope easements, generally as shown on the plan, for the future Milliken Avenue railroad crossing shall be dedicated to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 3. Notice of intention to form and/or join the lighting and landscaping district shall be filed with the City Council prior to recordation of the map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. 4. The existing overhead utilities (communications for the 66 kv electrical and railroad) shah be undergrounded along the entire project frontage extending to the first pole offsite. (west and east). Partial reimbursement of one -half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development as it occurs on the north side of the A.T. 6 S.F. railroad is feasible from the presently undeveloped properties. The undergrounding shall be completzd upon further development of the parcel contffnfng this project (APN 229 - 272 -31 or an in- lieu,. fee shall be paid to the City for the cost of undergrounding if the work is accomplished by the City prior to completion by the developer. A lien r agreement to this effect shall be completed prior to the issuance oi--building permits. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH BAY OF MAY, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chai rman ATTEST: Brad u er, Deputy Secretary f /o _1 Resolution No. DR 87 »12 - General Dynamics ' May 13, 1987 Page 3 1, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Co ission o the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adapted by the Planning Commission of the City � Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of whe Planning Commission held on the 13th day of May, 4087, by the following vote -,to -grit; AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS; II 1`t _ N Q H C: 41 C6 `�L4�y[piC.LN=4��pp6 a'Op „O v�L }yaRti4 ONO O6S 4�9Y u543 V `L G dqS, 9 GL4�Y �u.yH a�'i ^p$9�N.CO _ _ n E �2.3 zz cc e C yyq,r y2Y.u. OLD °.97 SO y ~4OSs�604w ��N 4 -eL� �3 ��Swi •vG �y r.�Vr' yw0p1 1�^u�uyy.. R VT.: SDwiVO R'.t Pgl�MONY O.`wY O� OyM6Y 0•�'v 4C 2N L1 �^ .�C6gN KY+� IC M� t ~_ �oM� V H S W �o u o Z N f 'N 44i�.a N < O 4-.24 ,o_N V, 5 at i8 pd a+! u it x M Nv J Ra��^�Ab W O'�Vi W c�up �;q y r ry p O! K� ■u�`g4SiOCNV sit. Ib .n 0 Y~ D1 Y t 1 yyYO Ra lip Y IQ ;dy O O 00YeYNCY�SO Y. yS }y8y! Y � ys_L Mi o�i,4�.6 ��sy aGp3iYM "! � 1V1 Ah lop pr �P YY t M N 1 Q .L. 11 �«U61. G4 TU CtV A�-T LrK VT V IICY � °LU° S v Fc is c eio w'a u u'-c a. �ia� C M� u.4. a b"'�O C. �dC �j. �"'+ � '•"may, -.p � .'-gyp G.n.. vr,c n. Huuo lur- c� .as•., •-a. '�e' yQ N.0 a QrN°'�c°tq tur F L�U p�Q' L4Y:��cAC OQ�F�F�E 4G� C i,••(y�. C�;': el g0. L'd C$wp' 4RUFm UGt uF� ANp$y, q� L,��.Q r.• VC V y «T.�uCw LCaY ..C�C.•! d L. yL'II ^ply n L4..RG,yp Nµ 'b�=L. 9Y �Y. YC.G.SCd V— b 2 F z7z COm rr4R NCp :.V•"g CO�"l pyN \. L dRfa r. Y 0 Y° y y CCU y4y i �p1 ` £Gyy d N �pprt ,Q JqqG y' Y�.m qM °.0 ENS 1V j�Y R VUN W q�ET L ^0T6 OaY T�.�U�9N NOF `U «pp 4'�. dya G`C, NN2:9 IIe�' NC NY�GcV �C ^ ■d ANNNOSSFLyC� $y aU N A.j a�$c Ny�.C� is$�� ..d.N = O u °V fe '�e'v> 'a -CZZ XS % RF'1^i+u' p`CCa cYi i r `m R �NN 4'w. U ^yMCC{T.?C $ + ^s +Y YG°•y,a VCroy� �C 6u�G{yI� VUY� ��yyYLtJ •Y -=ypppp G CC4�=��yyy'''��{5. G1asL •}may YVy�} 9�0. 4C�y FIS�69. C�Y Y� NM�thlLa ��GJ •['°wN �n V�.r Q6 IKn �i QG SLgMC . d^o F� yYC. FAiF rd' q w Gp1$ QQ^a q,W s k V.9 y Y nNL as �"i ic? 94u ° °a A$ rQ 'r L 's° NnF �~i� YY a"A � ^SO• � � H� �WY 'f N >O�C� i.1LCN� � Qa!Y' a ib •Q -'•°• aL y o ro'e•V• aa'� •�•° h��+� '�e YC��'b � y^V^ vFpi qq °Y $4 S'z g3 �'.a �� WV�'� '%' fl cv °�'� •L•�co, rt+ io i ' sd 4ILS W'�Q.aIINgN� aC.N -�.+ oP tc�a Ga �NZ A C }`pgp -A CC'^'. CV�QC �aF cpc = CN q .R4 ~ 4! p. �iaAN y9 6�N `�4� �4.W LG ZywY 1. pl's . Y�l�VC Y'aAd V 1 C L C t4 4` V q pS C Y iCp' 4 V t� L D 6O O 4'C L 9 w A' i C r ol ? f�. C• C .�i O L aii L 'w G vi l N 't �." 4i. C se rrpp�'OC� ACyp 'yy n Y Y C�� d. NO L�gCtC G9. 1 C4 +F VLa _.0 ;!�z PON �`O L .3 DfsY r� U �'d YYYYYY Ya�(pyif {�.0 O dOLVt CYp tY himLZR �N6 1 -�F.nQ Kr MA Nq� iU �aR Q.4 ptl T.�•� r�X VCi.C9 V+G q<.FL 1 O A � d. � e 9. C ` � 6. .r. DPr6 0 C C S � � ■ + Y � q Y u ^= ��N OD rate M! Ma'C wC�p cr fib +M gQ aO.HA .c. •LiP'• Mj#.q'� O Ng > iO dy. PqC � � 6bN C�: aCft '� 4WN'O C D 6. MA aNO uP6 lLyby ?�� u° pg 4G °C'O ' °`u N c bU p.Aw. CD . EM. JygOpPb u L� R�N YN 'V �. ••wD `D.N U.0 riJ_gIR �N. na aN 4Vr u u uw� <M _w NC4N OY 'I OISf 'OP �S �9 �� a�p~Y.Lt.O IMP Tpa1�� Y.C.D.» � �G c •^ YLY ��tA N.NT^ -I " 7 ' �yJL fYPp V6 N x p lidN<tlONN�.L�«.. aL VC yzgj'S -1 ^aCCT�4 Np�i^ c.Y t�IOS �� ~~ T�wY r ' AG ^ca^ O.D rn.c �aia Y~D ..w N.�'i `M�',Y�od°y oP'�'Na y° Ca !rrn sa Or LUb g ° .0 i °ion .nib ~yy .A�3 Nti< `o a -ispiO �w° O .y. LL L O N p�{ �N O O t4a cN caTi Yip O tee. c 4e-N E.wa ! «'o L a'D rG q rT� L �.' + .` i ^ v ° •s 'C" a q Yi L' °., �'i r CP NM YI R V w'C� .r.ANNdi4 n y v+° ar wl CpUO Y}NA ppp NbAa M NyAacssJ n °tae g4 °ilcu O•Q y. nww O.b. r�jj awL ya„ E lw O1 Q4 NN yy� VL® q. �.%L pVYLC06 zj'. C ...4` Oy� C A cYbbR 04 ^�n !/P "'NaN wt Nr 6N iNO hy^Nl aN yrr P>P4N D.0 6 O' . XO .ca 4t: �'.. R rF9 .'Lou QR 7 r.� ova.'.. 6L7Va u 'y -0.4 e) V`a fY`L c daDta. n .NiGV U4 -0L 1 O A � d. � e 9. C ` � 6. .r. DPr6 0 C C S � � ■ + Y � q Y u ^= ��N OD rate 6 L wC�p cr fib +M gQ aO.HA .c. •LiP'• Mj#.q'� O Ng Y6. L. y. dy. SQw 6�t yC QQy �, d Y Oj�N >y0 4Vr u u s^. to <M L O-0 MN'�ba a yip_ R N C � N O A NN. C E xg 3ylW'�, � V �L � o; c N4 T�wY r ' AG 4 ttw aa • s-0 G CS ua+ v .Na v u It M— gp. C.'°p�,a O C ° sa Or LUb g ° .0 w c °Nwr �N qSi— t4a cN �O,fl Yip �qd tee. c 4e-N ! «'o .r.ANNdi4 pt'gw Z.R� CpUO Y}NA ppp NbAa y19Utt R.t. La u O•Q y. yii O.b. Na M��L g[3 o N,«` Oy� C A i.A. ^�n gi O OObi °.`=E rul SOY. D u rL�'r X �'.. R rF9 .'Lou QR jai+ _ r.� ova.'.. 6L7Va u 'y -0.4 e) V`a fY`L c daDta. n .NiGV U4 -0L W l�DC'A ON -^L c�C>r SO C KaS'ti iYC UNNMW U�tK rrC c E'�p r�Cyyp ¢ y p c° b.'ygjyy, G+ A' yam. �g4Y y LO Qp �4 yOGN . +'^ LL:fJ L�� 'O d ^ O. uCN el dEie SNqq !`q 4yyt � 4L 9dir .� qJy' a Y2QE �+ 2J� f�. i.^ Ly. 2'•.a Bpd S .uG A. q d r el o. . fir! � Gag O OOO�� uu Ea 4�i! p L pH G N!� C i u� ulVlIp~ `d- �mYd L V Vpp N q C NU OYtpN �u0 p 4V • . i a L Cq.Kup is Ay Yr '�. YWO u O+ 6U<CC. MrA Syr y° °/�j� [I}N p.. Z dyypY p�Y�Raq pu ello Ei � Y r p10� GYd It ii 4q�l n�a Y pppp +y �u UU ��JAFy. _�C�Cq �LrY.MO. Q. 5i> ~'GL L WdG pLL a� ✓ <� u n.. Cl vg GL '.,fcl eu �y & &60 ffiw.x q j¢¢j�� 9 S'�'t?wi IU... r „ �.qt G 1. ' N gKr c CST qLy N5>gt� 5^ a j0 GN •' u Y � c L c q �+ c o v_ v G 6Y �Ly p` •.LOO {� K1LY Vf u 6qq yyNyµ p. FRO.q ORCi` �G.;la ��6Y 'itLWNR PAq {2N Wi `.3 F.Ci 1L LC.0 0 N N dNL R.. r C +`��py ■A yaV ��p% OV-. G imps it res 2 QY n� r a C� LQ Yq1 VG 5 u rn 4^ .* � i o, $ M C 4CCU q 6Y�JI YY y -r v�y plyJ' es'O Y'. pp+eQ S� LQQq,� `N> 9YyCOC,G WO tt +r y�r �NO qo� Y ;N b V G • H MM • 4 �. IL 4 Cr i N _ Mn CY N �� pTU V • �a .° l� L v� �" Na + t % Y O� x Q� 4. 'Vy may. S N yu'.. u �y G}+ °� �o Ny q G.O s OYII.^ N� O. u p n �u G. 9 x N U + V d L O d .� O Y L 4 q. Ll G N N Y C g L a u U 0 pL f w i OaLL> NR-lo VC. BAR rU9F C9h LO MinC LY 20 u u' ed'�. Ya Lv 53 sy�+ = S a 35 » N + Z J LEG 6 Fr qGn wOn 6 6. O u K C W W E S 6 d I LL ' v �I V n\ sOY�b� rD Ezs Z3".¢O qT NCEY , Y Y.6 MY Q uj r,1 M d r +YOO C �' A' .80 J , T^NY� eau ... �.. 2, �s $ _ 613 § lz c E= o ayye -CC' evil �k yq44yY pp � i5ri9 O _-.94 spVp, V ~`y �M LCgybG 1 .3 last J LL 003C" g. If C �tLO Y �_ "X Ira° z� I t �g �aKaK�^ Y 4 w C C as 4 act gas g M 13 A z M C bLa 4,42.4T. v d :- bc M.ntl 4q OV w� N ?G�'.S YNr� ' CI wrV wvu §c t y J S C F C.a W Q tl y r se U.ri Y. 4.0 L rf a�L y r�`4• Yw s+ r4 `Na m .�� 41 O ,X C E 41Ls aN y Y ut� uy M Yy C Y�Lal O'�.rA ale 3_1 y. yN� in ttj ptyf q y�j .9 �y Z wpa,, yy'. �~LyS um NW w`'au LNL CC° G N. $ppiano 6y KiHQ a � rE N �L6{yAM1n'C+ �L •'Y � L_U Y iyy" ar: Nw w � M1 y0.0 N N AF 3� .4 ri r > �.9T r.q wu lNCy�s� Y �_ yi,z Cry,, nN Y^i)t N� w .Cr C • � a �t.� K uu $ yy��++�OL 4q �+ be dam+ LPN N ,Ci.M w f N ~C A m N {1t frt. i°A a$ NN Ma Z. 'V Cw.�_tl y ;OC �' ��bL a i�aaF {{R1� a . Sg 0 «V coez �Fxjy 6 G Q U K O G �A a �p YT+L Rtl ri {W�yM� LNV W Cy E�V{L1 fir• $ id {�� N IYyty N Oaf M.Y. Y.> HV ONyy� A11a.N YCq tl y r se U.ri Y. 4.0 L rf a�L y r�`4• Yw s+ r4 `Na m .�� 41 O ,X C E 41Ls aN y Y ut� uy M Yy C Y�Lal O'�.rA ale 3_1 y. yN� in ttj ptyf q y�j .9 �y Z maw U IX Mme' Y �L6{yAM1n'C+ �L •'Y � L_U Y iyy" ar: Nw w � M1 y0.0 N N AF 3� ri r > �.9T r.q wu lNCy�s� Y �_ yi,z Cry,, nN Y^i)t N� w .Cr C • � a �t.� ^gY ppR yy��++�OL 4q �+ 9ti Cr dam+ �tl �.. LPN O i Cy SaM�C i+ �rNYO. cy m c r^' m N {1t frt. tl y r se U.ri Y. 4.0 L rf a�L y r�`4• Yw s+ r4 `Na m .�� 41 O ,X C E 41Ls aN y Y ut� uy M Yy C Y�Lal O'�.rA ale 3_1 y. yN� in ttj ptyf Mme' Y �L6{yAM1n'C+ �L NAY Y O iyy" ar: Nw w C � Y c~ ri �.9T tyVCr"rRRwe G,[iq yi,z u p C M N ^gY ppR yy��++�OL 4q �+ 9ti Cr L C. `w.q SaM�C i+ �rNYO. cy C V � L�!! V O l V t;; f f �Y a: Lu y,o CC a Sit `Vb L, wow 0 m to • Sol. b —VIC �. 29 Cappq''' ifi�y 5�w ar. air. � 6 C L O pyY, L L Lk'H N VY� Y t uiui7 �Cp4�� 6 4 �i� 1e. yGV L q C S O 't"o.�r a S:u. F. w Ur —Ya L$ wg .i "u .�.. "s,, gVo 'a{r� «P w m id a ae M SA r� 9NaDN L pu C 9 VVp N...� GYC r L� �s �u. e.� VTQjT ■■. . z r.7TV AT.I 2'f A Ttri Trrl STAFF REPORT s o DATE: May 13, 1987 1477 TO: Chairman and �wmbers of the Planning Commission' FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Chris WestTan, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENYIRONMEEKTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -01 iDAM BE VLLOF. - A proposa o cons ruc two me ,um wholesale s ri ution facilities 'totaling 150,64t'. square feet in the General Industrial District Subarea 8 on 6.5 acres of lan6 at the northeast corner of Arrow Highway and Maple Place - APN: 208- 461 -12 L PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of site plans, ele'Oations, grading awn �issuanc— a of" a Negative Declaration B. Surrounding Land Use a6d Zoning: or Mane ac ulurmg Wore ous.ng; General Industrial -South Vacant; General.' Industrial East - Manufacturing; General Industrial West = Vacant; Industrial Park C. General Plan Designations: rojec bite - Generat Industrial North = Industrial Park South Heavy Industrial East - General Industrial West General Industrial D. $ite Characteristics The site is currently vacant end there Is no signiticant vegetation. To the north and east are existing rail served warehousing /manufacturing facilities. The site to the west is undeveloped and is designated as Industrial Park District. A private rail spur runs along the curved portion of the northern property boundary and connects to an AT &SF Railway Co. lead rail. Street improvements have bfen completed along Maple Avenue and Arrow Highway; however, sidewalks and drive approaches have not been completed. Arrow is a Special Boulevard, ITEM 0 � f REPORT DR $7 Ol - 07 - 'IltevECOPMENT May 13, 1987. Page 2 ' E. Parking Calculations: _. :, rl NUO'er of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces t Spaces of Use Footage tabs Required Prow., Warehouse/ Distribution 150,640 1/1.000 58 87 1/2000 1/4000: 11. ANALYSIS: A. Background= Thehinduatrial Specific Plan requires that parcels RU acen: a "exf sting, , rail : spu;rs should accommodate rain service. 'A letter frbm the AT,§k Railway CompaiV was submitted -. to the City stating :that i.n order" ,to provide rail service to the site an extension Of the head track must cross Maple "Avenue to the west. This aext- ension 'would w!nvolwe properties under different ownership and' of a 44f�nt zoning designation, Industrial Park, where rail service is not allowed. staff . recommends that rail service not be required for this site. B. Design Reytiew. Committee; J,he Design Review Committee (McNiel, o moan: F rev? e W pr-ojt6t on .=Apr 1 16, 1983, and recommended that it ,bey forwarded to the Planning COMOSsion with the =' following conditions: 1. A 3` screen wall should be provided at"the east and west sides of the drive entries of Arrow Highway: Z. The wind gall at the <ich area Oould,be flared approximately 45 to-60v versus 90'. 3. The "park" concept as submitted for the employee plaza area was acceptable. 4. The corner design scheme provided by the applicant was approved to be used at all of the office entry areas (see Exhibit "C'')F 5. The radius at the drive entrance should be increased. 9 PLANNisNCipp h�ISSi'6f REPORT , DR 8 -01 Ow![TS rDEVELUARENT �{ May 13, 1987 A •� Page 3 I� ^r' C. Technical Roy3eW Committee "Grading Co�7ttee raised a • raz Wage ssue a on g awes property line Kfowever felt that t x it could be adzquately addressed through a Candition of Approval. D. Environmental A%sessmefit: Part I and II of the; Intitial Study ave. been camrp e e an no si;gnifitant impacts .Ave been found j related to, the corstraction of the proposed W141 ng. III. FACTS FOR FINK -n S: The : troposed. use ys 'consistent ,w��y.r the enera a1? an , n usi.al Specific Plan. The building design and site plan tog alter with the recommended conditions of approval, are in compliance vith the Industrial Specific Plan and all ether applicable City Standards„ t IV. RECOMMENDATIONi Staff recommends that the Pianni�—Commission -- z . approve Z�nt Review °� and issue a Neg�ativ '3claration > through adoption of the attached Resolution, l,, i ¢.> Respectfully s bmitted, Brad ler City Planner = BB,CWsvc Attachments. Exhibit "A" = Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Corner Elevation Exhibit "0" - Elevations - Ex it."E" - Grading Plan Exhibit "F" -Landscape Plan Resolution of Approval y; , s f C �w / lit ".' � on �Ll, � m ,w,r . :I M,W14AWA.l,If1U v T E I m�IYOWFalwai. .'rt S, r" r„rwer.ar Lrr�,.r vacrtr s' e 5� ' Not RANCHO CUCA ONGA PLANNING L)IVISEt,,, 9 i CITY Of. t,i =mod s RANCHO cuckrvioN PLANiVi ®IVLSiC I EXHIMT- scALre. ANk _ ' a= a wwv. F-• 4 6L00.1 rYK V. �- � • �� Y� tR7.rlYM4llMi - - -� 4-ii � Jl�Q1D7lRO[ *� - --- -- ---- ----) 1 t -- - --- I WE PLAN CITY Of. t,i =mod s RANCHO cuckrvioN PLANiVi ®IVLSiC I EXHIMT- scALre. ANk _ Not dik iI133'i .- 4,-�.SGALD -L& . .. NO K CITY or- azl2L RANCHO CUCAMONG ,, JR- --T Wt Wr~ rdv 7-1-1 1 NOR CITY Or, rrD, -IMF- RArSICHO CUCAMONGA PLAT` NI,XG DjvSoN SCALC. LANDSCAPE CON9CEAr AL41V ; AI CITY I�..Ai�IC•y1�� y�q� x ♦II PL.ANN14XG QI't1LSCON _9 +rn.n.,frar. L'MmPA gem r 'XAN amMIR Ida .. vP 1i .. lY 10 V W7 � IR"ih aa��yyrr leolr I LANDSCAPE CON9CEAr AL41V ; AI CITY I�..Ai�IC•y1�� y�q� x ♦II PL.ANN14XG QI't1LSCON _9 NORTH CITY OF ITEM. A t -- /)j _ RANCHO LHt VU lYIOl �TGA TITLE ~r FL .i`v:tiI G DIN'ISIaN EXHIBIT. SCALD -1.40 j' RESOLUTI/ N NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMUNOc PLANNING COM'il.s1'ON APPROVING DEMLOPMW REVIEW NO 87 -01 LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROVr ROUTE EAST Ot KVLE AVENUE IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIALI DISTRICT' WHEREAS, `on the 12th day of March, 1987, a complete application 'was filed by David Development for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 13th day of Hay, 1987, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a, meeting to consider the above - described project. NOW, THEREFORE, tip -Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following can be net: 1. Th4at the proposed project is consistent with the Qbjectiv-s or the General Plan; and 2 That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisloaa of the Development Code; and 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public heal-th, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious, to properties o improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse, impacts on the environmeff—a—na-Iffat a Negative Declaration is issued or May 13, 1987. ' I SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 87 -01 is approved to the followrng conditions and attached Standard Conditions: Planning Division: 1. A 3' screen wall shall:be provided at the east and weal., sides of the drive entries on Arrow Highway. 2. The And wall at the lunch area shall be fiared'at approximately 45 -60 versus 9&. O',// PLANNING COMMIl,%" fRi - MiLTION NO. OR 87 -DI..- GAY %S DEYELOENT May 13', 1987 ' Page 2 qP 3. Pedestrian amenities shall be provided in`ihe outdoor employee I. lunch court, such as, tables and chairs and ,trash receptacles. 4. The,corner design schome of recessed openings: at t south end of Buildings A and 8 provided by the app ]icant sh l be used above all of the office entry reas fa:- the ^ project e- ghthi� �C ). y .P d f s�...____— 5. The.., ridiuy` at the drive entrance !Jall 'J'e increased to face, . itate truck ingress and egress and /orj the monument sign island eliminated. 6. landscaping shall be provided) along- he west, property boundary /building face and be coordinate) with the grading plan., The coordination of the two plan's shall be reviewed and approved by the Building and Safety Division and City Planner prior to the issuance of bu- ;lding permits. 7. A turn- around shall _be provided north of Building A to the satisfaction of the Fire-19i strict- Engineering Division: 1. An in lieu fee as contribution to the futwe undergroundi�,g "of the existing overhead utilities (Tel a�c�;,,,icatJons_/ and Electrical) on the opposite side of Arrow,Route shall & paid to the City prior to.the issuance of building permits. The fee .shall be one -half the, ity, adopted unit amount times the lenghth of the project frontage. 2. Notice of intention to form and /or jofin the Lighting and Landscaping District shall be filed with the City Council prior to recordation of the map or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Building and Safety: 1. An easement for cross lot drainage on the property to the east shall be obtained to accept drainage from the project site or the project site shall be rd designed to contain all drainage on site. 2. An agreement sh0l be obtained, from the adjaceCit property owner 1 to the west to contain drainage on that site or the project site shall be redesigne,i to accept drainage .frcm the westerly property in its undeveloped state. f ;3= PLANN1iG Cl?M15"LQR 11ON N,!', ; OR $-Q1 *nal�rS 6+YE�:Oi'ME. May 13, 1987. Page 3 1 /l i APPROVED AND .ADOPTED' THIS 13TH DAY OF MAY, 19$7.K� ya PLANNING COMMISSION OF TWE CITY OF'RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY.: ;irry cme I , CH ai man ATTEST. Brad a I er, e - Y S eeret ary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Comeixsion of the 'City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby cerVfy' that the foregoing Resol -utfon was dg7y, and �4t regularly, introduced, passed, and adopt -4d by the Plans :ing Cammissiob ofr the City of Rancho Cucamonga;, at'a_ regular �aeeting of the Planning Cti►rit�ssi`on hela on the 130 day of May, 1181, bi fol l owing vote /to -wit: ' y AYES: CQM9MISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS Ask E i (r �, Asa vo=d�,_ ggY9 q�. c:. =,� Tqd a•_iit+« tx 18 °. =Y - p t $ i.^. °; ct.A�uoau Sc "'e, =�i ao�;si ;, t � yy q F 4 E. Y^ 4 C °• l C y r n�A _ CD LLJ T Y �Ri 1t 8 u' �� -. � QC`vat•W -CN 9YY� C�d�Q YY�y. ��p$ Y$p L`�Y �G �% G.aO•dO�GC r $ Q. N. MA Y CL qY� 6 q YL OLCu 'O Y.N YWOw.. C°�VY �JC� aNr- Nq0 C '0 �_ r ^pp y q M+ O t b N C yy > �( $ �-.� V� d� 8' ' YOpV OMT t {y'r^ ~afe.�� nn'L a+�.4r u�q °uo. k �i r`CYgY �C ?C2v= YYN� �Y^ Y�ie gYUC Og4��i� ,ibS tr'. y;y a.° S ys{�.` §`�C�� q'M pC tsY viii! Vu pydpywdd,4. 6, pC =p VyT H4 876' I 6wY U6V Zu�iLKO a'^C O �OC.ON CYa• KNT �� 501 �C'6L GGi E ` • Z WY ° C ✓yay CNC� u 4 3 � CCCt p�p, ^ V I 4w6 yG e�C9 eC Y a'i a G s. a i °gam !ti-K tilQ =Ng�gg TEE A � N.• N. �/S.S O R q Ni• �s ^I�wNta°is � � a. 9C a 0 pp�C YEN a� q < M Y. -.g �V� _y:: o�.l -C .�.CY.^ {�> + O uG .Gj aG� . aeL. --- '^ w L y y y� L O Gym. � g� q66 u It . � -O+ y p00 �N aq� N�O. ds � A�U{L.iiCA2 0�.+,�5 CV w. C— q 9 L A � � �. d iy�. � �L G4QE°. �_�.✓ G G __ LL 6 ali y� yw §Y . 4y u _ y l OT q 9 n �p0�1 L iCc A4 ^ G N VO}�TV.O�C .N ��lVZu Ny ..OeeCY— y Y 3 pi �c7S q�0 a0 N P2 NP4. u v. 29 iw iy Leo �pp@G■ �u '^ , yr.. c 2y. NGaY+q v 'OaY C6 ^C qZ -' +VZO L... V yL C C 4�i y �Cp ^C L2yYyE�O'O� b <WT g2 96y yN J C G N L S Y y N y Y O C Y Y N C S— .+ 4 L, G Sa q L d� ... H M G O a 6 9�$cs C.y uYO O —� �ta� Y1C —G YCY ifL ��.Vy.1u?IL �� V.0 >A^ VL1y LLL q Y p m C.0 6 q a L > O L L N V ^^ NO Hr NO K•-ei0 yS Ku ~` L4 Lp 3:5 -8 Y G i6L CYy4. oq nr care o., -�o�c Yea ius�i j"' 9 oT�o m c. °n✓&C V�V.� OOOT VL6 1'LC��N �.4.q Y Y1°' .++P& 60 Yy MVpgQU � ^�,N". Yq Su a n �y 20 =° L�.a.� A�:cc g�!Yy��A- 98 %- coq -- rn`va`v. t'i oq qa B� °YNe oa> `ay 72 k 4°L qH �' .N.00.� °' ° G��TNi•'L Z° d L �� Y y� 'M 6L Nl uv2. ,0iL 0OS1Vr C�� id CN -LA. I.a YNV L gV2yV YL is 7 a� y q —.t L O `V ` z b 6 y CN ET CAN p��Ny3L- IgYC VpYNM NL fsL �C s pC A NC..O.. qqE.� .aaE4C� c Y 4- 152 C�. Y. El,_ YVC ��J�yN S( ^sc/� N tyr YAC L rbS NYO V OvpL ^p. Y� c Oqa ^01 E^ r _ set �« 1.. q aR v'q' Y y c «b NINy qat °L gcv^. u Na � G� :. G t Y � W= 01^ qC ■ C � Y. � y V. � ® B L p�� YY � N M Q � ,/ O iY O�""�G >O�f��pp y CV' ` �" p L G A N p Nnq' T a C YE q AC r m q T9 e MY O eN r N p � yyt 9 YV -0�v Vqt Y^ K f E> >Q S > 6 y CYe y a V N S L �q gy4� V Y Y Y L t ro T A ��Lp ! �[ qY� 979 G' IZI t Y TG <8�66 6NYi�J� p* y yp� y 1R'GNNLa2 NYI.} Y G �C Y +` dr D2K�i.°r =1E V W ^�F2 '2yCp OG 9 V g 1L 4�� G Vt6R AMA 9C a 0 pp�C YEN a� q < M Y. -.g �V� _y:: o�.l -C .�.CY.^ {�> + O uG .Gj aG� . aeL. --- '^ w L y y y� L O Gym. � g� q66 u It . � -O+ y p00 �N aq� N�O. ds � A�U{L.iiCA2 0�.+,�5 CV w. C— q 9 L A � � �. d iy�. � �L G4QE°. �_�.✓ G G __ LL 6 ali y� yw §Y . 4y u _ y l OT q 9 n �p0�1 L iCc A4 ^ G N VO}�TV.O�C .N ��lVZu Ny ..OeeCY— y Y 3 pi �c7S q�0 a0 N P2 NP4. u v. 29 iw iy Leo �pp@G■ �u '^ , yr.. c 2y. NGaY+q v 'OaY C6 ^C qZ -' +VZO L... V yL C C 4�i y �Cp ^C L2yYyE�O'O� b <WT g2 96y yN J C G N L S Y y N y Y O C Y Y N C S— .+ 4 L, G Sa q L d� ... H M G O a 6 9�$cs C.y uYO O —� �ta� Y1C —G YCY ifL ��.Vy.1u?IL �� V.0 >A^ VL1y LLL q Y p m C.0 6 q a L > O L L N V ^^ NO Hr NO K•-ei0 yS Ku ~` L4 Lp 3:5 -8 Y G i6L b g 9 = — I U �S —U.4Y -5Z. q Z o; ZVI :—.4 S-y SIX 2 2%4, T 5�- z '42! mg .2 N VAN t- O V-4 "z "if =a ry 891 vzM 4 M 'MEE S-6 2Lrn PA. f. C;l 10 R -at M-2 4MW .,I ZV; 10 -C C. L o .,% 1-19.1 p I CFO —.piEv pt g, UM sv2 7 a Z TOO rl, Rs: t in ems R—S gz-- 2 X mim rTx .Rita SIT Jh- CC ir's g-� 15 A 4 06 NZ uC g Zv a E avo. M." S tx:; gza� Be- W o' . x A'N clZ C 4t oi,r $ a ^ori yy IOLL VA DD C Gy 4_ Y .Yy q 6 N yCN- YyOL V y"G U U V C 4 U+ f AY ^ O. d. �O YyLL p�ab rva �$ v qa'y s_ 65 YT �o.�dN4 MLY@Urn q. ' 'Owc. rr F{ g 'IUiN �hn N i Y�Ga d � y y aN� ` Y cvv y,rd i °$.cc �i.= q9 Yo C�O v xs qVU $v° 4-s- aw u,i� 6Q 0��3 Y'w 9G Cy 0.. Cps ne° w° yCd C O- 9y�dy � v 7 ydL�° iow °c¢i aua'�gE Z " u °•-O CT 4 i 4 9M= -AL ''LO T. g,�.. v ��b dOY C S.; y h au �� U- y .5 Is .e°ia u d C d pH- L� S2 9 wN d y ^� =y. ��odCe g vCCy�L, p .�ea L °11y 1` c�.�v qu o i N26 yL. d y YYa V.a Yg11 f nC O. LLACY 1��6� =L4N 6. I`L sN—LY R: I�q. Y.VW i -uL _x =C. G oi,r $ a ^ori yy IOLL VA DD C Gy 4_ Y .Yy q 6 N yCN- YyOL V y"G U U V C 4 U+ f AY ^ O. d. �O YyLL p�ab rva �$ v qa'y s_ 65 YT �o.�dN4 MLY@Urn q. ' 'Owc. rr F{ g 'IUiN �hn N i Y�Ga d � y y aN� ` Y O•O U 3.1 q 6 � � U q9 Yo C�O v xs qVU $v° 4-s- aw L Vy .O EL06 —cc Cy 0.. Cps ne° w° yCd C 2 � d day u a'- O i wn ".$ o �1Oo yLv °•-O CT 4 i 4 L6 T. g,�.. v U uuY YY4 C 'Oyy oi,r $ a ^ori yy IOLL VA DD C Gy 4_ Y .Yy q 6 N yCN- YyOL V y"G U U V C 4 U+ f AY ^ O. d. �O YyLL p�ab rva �$ v qa'y s_ 65 YT �o.�dN4 MLY@Urn q. ' 'Owc. rr F{ g 'IUiN �hn N i Y�Ga d � y y I MNUL _ 3.1 q ]sx U q9 Yo un da w° OY^ 9 CU9C C .. VZl T. g,�.. `t.yCC U uuY YY4 C 'Oyy U- y 0.yL d C d pH- L� Vpp qy wN d y ^� =y. " y.N60.9- .d..N_ygro UAWgC L °11y 1` c�.�v qu o i N26 yL. d y YYa V.a = �o� C N0► =^ S�'g0 '.Od Y.VW i -uL _x =C. G O�MCC 4 Y L coo eU�.O fc.C.gr �C'O ovq °l Cu€fi8 6yPC°4 {YL.d O � O`Y 6 <Za Gt vdi� V lu4 LlEi ti d /n I O z V e O eN e� S .Y.q� C Ilk S�CS` C 4 C Y0 p YefY gOY i~ Sv ` CA j2� u� r� d -3 IL s e _ 9 ■p + 1ST •��1 Q Y�' Yc . w � C O� ^pC • ^y 8$l . 9- �d° Y ` fiaip�.• pY L`.0 L{Ya4! p N.■ 6 N ^� . Cam, `p 4 `L p ■p. C Liyl.f Sp. YQ9 S�Gd yV �Q i yyy0 V 1d �C w.^... QYG. ag �E yE 'Y1m 04N i y v$ Y$*`[. NV.�+ at 4�u Yq L".C4 L�yggq0 S .0 Y1CS�i VMYpI1Y.e1.q MY.Y. C O k ` y a� MSJR 8,13 b��UOy CR PI iL yn(u/CL1fN CEO.« ^WJ ��YYVY @.. OY � MIS p�pp C ' ++ 0p0 O> O Y4 O Vq e00Y Ny iC � Yp}! '' � Nw aG� nY.L a'.�la S'a c`3�`v'a <« 3aa00'u- <31v N A f A y�yaCy I N 3 Y t00Y IRA 1byY. C I's ^p Y�e Vd+ yIL� Y w L � O� L•C- F u v � �a ^... �� uwC�� ew. 61.0. Y t�� N p6'�� hO. �Yp'• 1O �1 y CO�pp O� y YW CN Ow Z. _^ q�y.pyypY�• �L NHS C. 4w6� CL�Y:• 'J V1�3,4VY iNW ■� V Jp Y q6 , L ^ N Y +�z Cy +_N cC OI�Gi N� U dO~IOC_ei.� M yY u�1 v r11 ..Y µy OV v .�aNp d 11Y. V 4 i� i� Y.Ry ..' M SAY A 4 Y ♦rJ.y� p. YC `�.O p 0. _ ♦ h �O,L 0 `� y �`. p■p 7:94 it 'ZS '� ^Eu� Cp � r V ��° Y 3L'...� Y V Y.-.O Y M `�L °ate •`r a .S yam. YE y 8 q y a i• fC t N W J eN e� S .Y.q� C Ilk S�CS` C 4 C Y0 p YefY gOY i~ Sv ` CA j2� u� r� d -3 IL s e _ 9 ■p + 1ST •��1 Q Y�' Yc . w � C O� ^pC • ^y 8$l . 9- �d° Y ` fiaip�.• pY L`.0 L{Ya4! p N.■ 6 N ^� . Cam, `p 4 `L p ■p. C Liyl.f Sp. YQ9 S�Gd yV �Q i yyy0 V 1d �C w.^... QYG. ag �E yE 'Y1m 04N i y v$ Y$*`[. NV.�+ at 4�u Yq L".C4 L�yggq0 S .0 Y1CS�i VMYpI1Y.e1.q MY.Y. C O k ` y a� MSJR 8,13 b��UOy CR PI iL yn(u/CL1fN CEO.« ^WJ ��YYVY @.. OY � MIS p�pp C ' ++ 0p0 O> O Y4 O Vq e00Y Ny iC � Yp}! '' � Nw aG� nY.L a'.�la S'a c`3�`v'a <« 3aa00'u- <31v N A f A E 11 L4� �d\yw L fJ µ Y O fr = N W Y y 9 aaz �y N:CC E VL gt^ 6� M 4, be. a o �C QYLYL L V d 4 U W rp C6C4ppi a vy. O'N Y N G � � i Sa g G G � • ^L Y��yOL �p � a n LvY Nq i'S��N qL V S gw L ^L w° F a� y L Te- o o N �7y Nx u Ca CC'x� NY r N bw O � r4' u 9. qy N� V a LG bw 6 r O '31 a N� SE 1 e�9 q N Ur Y L^ 1 C Lr-�n CC yeea ae g"�3g� �L s �6q \O xYrdpq b a _mr ppV. A�t g �rC f 34- N6M�aQ y° AM `wy y''i iR +.. MUaC �iui 3N.N `C Cy^ C VQ'4C 3w'.L ¢E.1� yO BVO ' ~q �y v O.0 YMr NOdY.� 1.4i O"�lll� WLN �LiJ Y6 i!9 lP C..�4 � L4� �d\yw L fJ µ Y O fr = N W Y y 9 aaz �y N:CC E VL gt^ 6� M 4, be. a o �C QYLYL L V d 4 U W rp C6C4ppi a vy. O'N Y »NO qL � i Sa g =o � • ^L Y��yOL �p � a n LvY Nq i'S��N �r +tioN ^L w° Im a� y o o 5� ER Nx u NY r N bw O � r4' �VY'GX Y!N e a E m `L u s of waa N� SE 1 L4� �d\yw L fJ µ Y O fr = N W Y y 9 aaz �y N:CC E VL gt^ 6� M 4, be. a o �C QYLYL L V t N rD grw Q yf f W _ati fan C6C4ppi a vy. P :YAW' »NO ., � • ^L Y��yOL �p LvY Nq i'S��N �r +tioN Cie nc ="�' 5� ER � r4' .aplga �VY'GX Y!N N s of waa i .°t o 0 q N Ur Y L^ 1 C Lr-�n CC t N rD grw Q yf f it u ag Z +y .. � ra i1 - 4 �. 4 r_ W L 1eCy O_4 Y ^� y O l 0 u 1 haw uc er s »� •4•s u s eau_.. o+• o.e SS gni O' a 4 « $'n E YY C Y i r C r V 44 C F FW OR CY ^Y Yr LU '4 Vp C�Y bum �O u ? 1 Y0 5' + s. + �^ c «^ `} �r yV� Qua$ �r %�i'; o. If 4v L± W.w•� G� 3�?�4 C. YY �4 «G^ O D. Lq.46 f. '^� <i ag»�K �`v ° !nom sub aFaw e' 4 � N p I] CITY OF RANCHOWCAMONGA vrnnff STAFF REPORT U o DATE: May I3, 19$7 et 1477 TO: £hainnan and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: BraO,Buller, CAA Planner by: Scott Murphy, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TRACT 10827 -2 DESIGN REVIEW - U.S. HOMES - Design review of u ng a eva ons and plot pans or a previously approved and recorded tract map consisting of 99 single famil, lots an 14.2 acres of land in the Low (2 -4 dwelling units acre) and Low - Medium (4 -8 dwelling units /acre) Residential Districts, located between liaveniAvenue and Hermosa Avenue, north of Banyan Street - APi 201- 563 -01 through 37, 201-573-GI through 42, and 201 -5P" 41 througl 24, T. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:- ~ -- A,. Action Requested: Design Review of building elevations and plot pans. B. Project Densityt 6.97 dwelling units per acre. C. Surroun Ing Land Use and Zoning: North- ingle tamely resfideniial .:rider construction'; Low (2- 4 dwelling units /acre) and Low - Medium (4 -8 dwelling units /acre) Residential Districts South - Flood Control East - Vacant; Low - Medium Density Residential (4-8 dwelling units/acre) West - Vacant; Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling - units /11cre) D. General Plan Desi' nations: g'�Jl+e`= `+r— Cd= `icwelling units,/acre) and Low- Medium (4 -8 dwelling units /acre) Residential North Low (2 -4 dwelling u,!Iistacre) and Low - Medium (4-8 dwelling units /acre) hzsid *ntial South Park East Law- Mediu:, Residential (4-8 dwelling units /acre) West - Lnw Density,Rezidentiai (2 -4 dwelling units /acre) ITEM p -- PLAr1NIt , Al f REPORT YRACT 827 -2 iIE� , `;IEN - U.S. HOMES MW 13, 19 ,83 Page, 2 -- r U. ANALYSIS: A. Background: Tentative 1`ract 10827 was originally approved-by, a tng �ommission on,, July 25, 1984. The approval consisted of d, total resid01ntial development of 2(,4j single Yamily lots on 57.5 r�res of land: in the low and low Med tnn Density Resi- '9ntiai 0i stV4 t,&,. For the purpose of this suK ivf on,, -J.he dt si t7 w4s - averaged over the site. The building architecture incluwed five house plans (,three single- story and two two -story units) using a woad siding,treataent, On December 10, nib, s to Planning Comissiorvi reviewed and approved the revised elevations and oi;t plant, &, Tract 10827 11 158 lots) and for Lots 184 t1trou94 %';2 of Tract 20827 (38 lots).. "the li, :its are designed In a mecfffterranean architectural style. B. General: The applicant is proposing to develop:. one single- star y . enr plat, 1,470 square feet in area, and four two -story floor a qu s ranting in size from 1,678 sare Feet to 2,299 square feet in aka. Ttre;s elevaV 4 are proposed for each floor Tan. C. 06sign Review Coma ttee: On April 16,,,2987, the Oesign 'Review omm a er c an Bul ert y evtiewed the oroject and recommended approval subject to following conditions: 1,. A- 2 -car garage ivfbn "wnui ; INN PLANNING 'Ct?t;�tISSN sT%iFF REPORT ` TRACT, 10827'7 'OtS*G1i REMW - U.S. :MMES May 33, Page 3' At the Desigir >Review Committee�',Miaeting, the applicant expressed- Concern over the extensive slope planting that would be required on the reW, yard- slopes. The applicant -stated that . the �Otv's .standard; (see Exhibit "D ") v�61d undermine stability of the slope rather than•nrovid` °n.g erosion control. 6, ,The CoamEittee stated :hat this item shold be considered any the ' -.snning Commission as a separate issue for discussion. The extensive slope ql ani ing re ui rej by i J-a condition of approval was intendod` ;.io mitigate f:ie" excessive slopes wit r;n Tract 10827. The key issue duri:': the revs" of Tract 10827 was the grading concept isha-i& resulted in shoes up to 21, feet in hei qhl, -, The ,developer proposed using l dh&,tapi ng to soften the appearance of these slopes: This pruiect-, became the ., genesis for as amendment to the 5evelh- 44 Code to increase the mount of landscaping required in excess of 8 4-t _fin he;g6f. `x a City Attorney's opinion i , that the L current praYdsions of thii Deve1gPment Codk. - ould apply to this developme2it. A variance,wouyd be required.,to Grant relief f: om the City's .slope an 1► g r Iquii emen..s un ess eve-la erg e ' Code modifi pri ar rat eie°issiunce at u1 al rR' g permits. Ask t III. RECM_ NDATION ` Staff recommends that the Planning Commission ap prajeie W5—IIding elevations and plot plar►s for Tract 10827 #2 vtrough adoption of the attached Resolution with conditions. Respe� ully suboittedt_ Brdd Bujrte City Planner BB: SM :te I Attachments., Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - SiteArading Plar, Exhibit "C" - Building Elevations i Exhibit "D" - Slope Planting Reauiremants Exhibit "E' Siupe Planting Diagram Resolution of Approval with Conditions` i 'I I P �i CITY OF R'\%iV CLCZ Nvi if ce ,._- __��_ � NORTH Ir J si +�,,, i � •, ` „ �.•^ � �' .nom '� � AM Mf{ ^ - - - - -- -- - - - - CITY OF Trrrul PLANNING DR ISIE'N e i/ r 7� ME Iwo,, J. EF CITY Or. RAINCHO CUCA� "ONGA PLANNm,NG DrrLqcN 4 EXHIMT. ;,i t � � •s: �ti, •. �I .� ' � t g _ --e'+ .tip'" . t , yr t� � �3 � 1 • : e �•- • --.-1" ..'!. ` r 1 �c�i� >7 s � .a`,. t I �.) �` 's •a r l .� of < �+ _•f - ti i..'�1 ��. s l � !i t I [� a.. 1 + jR r , °rr % ....sue "+I ✓ � ' lir. t'`-� n � .ls y o , Y ', ..�. � — SL CITY OF rrE.` PLANNI, c mr1sn'`i E.YHIi3"'= it \�\= � � y!~i X�� r S e- F ! ' s io,j .S } �♦ �� 1J�� .�—i_r � t � �'��,� I 1v I r � - �z.cs,on � • p CITY OF ITEN I: P T`I-'LNC� MrIST' %4 ! ESCNI[ii1': 4 �•-i i k ! .AT j ;: --..w, h CG V _ r 0. CiTy OF, 'r1,✓t ti.l L r R.ot.. CSMO G A TrrLFa PLANNiLxG DFVMN, ,VALE= I r Cyr ". •"•` '' � ,�, i J i I • �� j � :�I � .ice: CITY Of. RANCHO HO CUCAM0iNGA Try: - ...ZE/2ffV0l-/AA/dc- CITY or RANCIJO CUGAdMONGA PLA', NMING DRfMON TrrLE- EXH'Brr. SCtiLE: .m r yQ� Z rC CIS O% rrE.%I- RANCHO CUC.MaNGA Tom_ PLAr , -'! G Di7IIS'M f 3 r U� Ki t-i z LL -j CITY Or r r rz.% j: RANCHO CUC3141QNGA Tnu, PLAL ING Drv, ON e-;� SCALE.- co Amok LL -j CITY Or r r rz.% j: RANCHO CUC3141QNGA Tnu, PLAL ING Drv, ON e-;� SCALE.- E Y CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.tVI01` Cwk PL'L IING WIMN I % E HEFit T. SCALE-. p i crry ar RANCHO CLCAM' HAN ING CfV -SIQN IM .. � � p � n � lip At CRiATy C OHrO . ITFM. 5e- GM TrrLal PUMING DMSM EXH113n,.—JE� SCk LE. •4 Q'.r. CITE'' or- RANCHO or- CUCAMONGA P ANNTNC tat'VL5 )N e;�-> j ? y n_ `Y) ` r4 L2 Adak TrrLE- F-XHIBIT. C/® sold z ?�F t y n_ `Y) ` r4 L2 Adak TrrLE- F-XHIBIT. C/® sold z a < u, Slope Plantin¢. Slope 6enks five (5) feet or greater in vertical height and of 3'l or greater slope, but less than 21 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate groundcover for erosion control. Slope banks five (5) feet or greater in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shill be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance es 11 ow one 'A-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 square feet of slope area, one 1- gallon ;larger sFze .shrub for each 103 - square tee t of slope area, anq appropriate g.oundeover. In addition, slope banks in excess of eight (S) feet in vertical and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 square feet of s10}3e area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to so£tnan and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by then developer prior to occupancy. Maintenance by a Homeowners Association may be required by the Planning Commission on a case -by -ease basis. fe CITY of ftLlVl. .- PI.AN?v1j\, �w „j s 1 ri C� i 17 1)5 4p i Gct., 4 IS-- aA_ /M --5-- CITY QI: RAMC HG CUCA, ONGA Tom: HAM, ii\G LtiRfMDN �P_ °�'� E�`{HICt1': E SG%LF.: RESOLUTION N0. R A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO C'UCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION ±� APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT NO. 10$12-17 -2 LOCATEL` BETWEEN HAVEN AVENUE AND HERMOSA AVENUE, NORTH OF'BANYM I STREET IN THE LOW AND LOS- MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL �.` DISTRICTS - APN 201- 563.01 THROUGH 37, 201 - 573.01 THROUGH 42, AND 201- 583 -01 THROUGH 20, WHEREAS, on the 13th day of March, 2987,, a complete application was t filed by U.S. Homes for review of the above- described projecu and WHEREAS, on the 13th day of Mly, 1987, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held t.= Meeting to consider the above - described project. F NW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following can be meL: E 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code ani the purposes of tl:x ,district ir. which the site is lrcated; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, wiil not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That Design Review for Tract 10827 -2 is approved subject to the fo oTi wing conditions and attached Standard Conditions: 1. A two -car garage with bonus room shall be incorporated to replace some of the tGleee -car garages. The design, number, and location of these units shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. To minimize the expanse of concrete for three -car garages, a three foot wide planter shall br,; required between the single and double garage doors extending from the doors to the front property Ifne. The planters shall be irrigated and landscaped to I� 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TRACT 10827 -2 DESIGN REV,,iEW - U.S. HOMES May 13, 1587 Page G include one 15- gallon or larger tree with shrubbery or ground cover; the use of lawn is prohibited. The plans shall be reviewed and approved, by the City Planne.,ptior to the issuance of building permits. 3. Units with three -car garages located at the end of cul-de-sacs shall provide a two -car drive approach flaring out to a three -car drive within the lot. 4. Cornea side yard fencing shall be provided by the developer -. The design of the fence shall be consistent with the adjoining tracts (10827 and 10827 -1). The plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. Relief in the fo:.a of plant -ono with stucco over shall be provided around all wfndcws exposed to public view; 6. The ,elope planting shall conform to the Development Code regairements in effect at the time of issuance of building permits. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF MAY, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO•CUCAMONGA BY- �'arry T. McNiel, Cnairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, 0eputy Secretary I, Brad. Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of May, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES:. COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: '� 22 M OES°�lY OS VAS Cg01r ,� °�� M°1r ^C .t V LwNO CLY M R YO '� ONEu/ 1� 6 NY�,.,YOp, Ye N+°A� 01 qw Oc• V •6 30 1 L� {� ty p Y jr, �'A wS 4 N -.- .S L p L Cq V y+ V ^ C M c Y Y Y �u \ g>sp.=�O. r A Hj o5 j! £. �E « I-z 05� o «apu« Y o ° Ai Ye °Y u i3.a • C .� L y p� r L V O�* N H. ... L� N a v U .Q� 51 C �Vy'• c i a � D^ so Yptlag = Vw,bwN. {�J o$��Ga. qa�+Y �`�w" ° ° aNy`� L� .YL wYU.tlatl -H I vii i. u_« AO s 'a €�a pi gx �o ga $��w Yaa .aewc S a ^N C ,c ^.«VNV� .tlipOf �A tl 'N�G 9C _ 5 y, 1 p O ,�Po Ntl p0 ^Aq bS Op D �S99 Eyp C N`.. tl.�^ �ed NYg Y•t pY�A 6L°V NVV LwN d°OY>Y 'V L. =c .^..0 qqCE YN^ pq, _y N.p_p EY!• � 'Y3-69 e - ` s no w« � Lp.N NY V wp Y 4J g b �L p i V c0 Y C,N G. yy � S tl QY yY yy p Q.Sd c0 °p. ^�pr v r +« O Y u 6p Q VyN CY. 1V• •!i=i y cC Y C Vi ^VY iG L NS ��c 2. }fry. jL .. •• M YdD O S 4 H•. OL..Ni Dtw fNLapi� N Q Q 2 a+ V 6J .Q s U eswd ad $vt 1"' PE: ?�. Y vnpNrj Y �3EaY r��m NON VO PZOS yyE° YY �� qw. LO � Oy to S 7 0.�. � L L �► . �yy S Y � A C S 6 Y 8 4 L V L C d G L Y OL Y tl S. N L S L `O> Y � Y Lip EOM M 6 �ssI �^ m ` tat y ^Y� ^uuG a N v� 'up A _c•R � Y i gi �fc�.r� q ^G aa. bON, .2 . q A EZ,�Sy Y YYa.N q. �`N.s i +. Is � 3 Vt.p .c<.N o • Q. 7 Olr..f^ `9 O ^ Y V� aa 6M w� yy R Y LylC G L�YY SYV�C+� VQ A ~Y4S Al �1n y°C,Y tlY gpN�1 V _06.0 Y •C.�rt N}�[ +. `:�L^�E m� ON `fix •NNW YOQC *� `Ctl. O1 wa iSq` !M y�j 6 rS LCY p1. ypC{1� ytl✓ Y�Y��Y Y �jyG}AaO {�. pY�aE. N F� �V�Y ��Y L+•° i4 `63 +.VS y^ —.let �R C�� NB Y60 {pYC pp� }].�Y� TT^pp// CC yCCppT CC�� s'O VGGGL iO °. ANY Y� M MNLE U KY°nNM YY W� ^E. riQ 61L tl� Wi 0 NI "A '�I V c 9GOa �i �u� non �w a ocN��`. uLCmN YALt R tqL Y t� A Yp O.L EVO LLbbkg m.^y gg zj G M .3i1 Y 4 ` Y a + O N p` • N IY. y Y y Y +. i V O— m 0 pEy ^pVN+ C aY tl NOY V y yG'.w � `+p'_ ` q ^N'y O.m Y CON■y ` .y Q `ACcu Va' GN y Y S~ 9 g � qp, ^'.0. � yy 'YY L OS � yNW�tipO 6��q ��' �, >Y L � V•.` i0 CL� � G9�0� ~m. .per N ��Su �LV O4J tY pY,tl 9C e Nt yNN YC �aY_ LQ O• LL • o L Cr�LY�OfSv awc N•�qS c y c. a G�.�GY2V o. r6° pp VV � N7r Y �si Y 31 ~ j� tlE L�SMN OS _o O��S Y� � Cad „OSi L- �� Vs nV, ^p . G= � L 6� c OY O Y• Ca 5 L� _• Y ` EEO {� 7y°^ Co. x�Q'cOc��`CYN ~~ OY N V t o C � Y d O� Y N C O M 4 E Y 4 LL .. 'O r Y Y G d iY �� r• C O ' y o Q 0 Y ¢C.r p 4AGL6 C wgbN 01•Vi <C QL d L �. O �.�.4 OY. e� 1D g.�A�6V ^�L U ..C..7nNV tl6dv v°� V 4iG 'p UL�O D. •. L O ��q8 yrjgS QV .0.1�9CYS.ti p1�.� .�. .Y N.GV �Y LrG. +66L ^ LI E w � CN� L�ww✓ ^ +�v `o r° a _' �� -� °'u :'i oO�o� °•n��pwv �OC�� 'YY w.OL sari �t dYw ✓C. c gp�m` FTO+ E w0• N $'". c� W w ^ J�C iY R1�,i( ^Y •��O `• �N d' �6 O� r� ` W� ��m 3qV 'O 'O�tYI O. y� G. ACV✓ w e O Vm +l &�N`^O' a °"• O q V+Fw' .Yi °. Y L G °.o�� °u. °, 4 �. y °'°o MU. 6w.0.`yya G w a�Q'wo. No� I s < • '�� L � s Oe V� N4 v �� N.N ✓ �� Y N Y sL G C a o� o Y L�� w � aOy� O .0 N. V.F� G C �n ^ Y ✓+Y MCa �4CC.�0 y QS •O °�� L O Y 3� p1L 0 of C4 YCAM. •� M .� #+ d� YQCNNYGQ'Gu� Y d °° G° O� .O 1. ..N ✓ ^d � O^ .. � L C O L~ A C Ccc .�. N �` 4 Ld 01 V pi L w t x L n. C Y� Q WC `�, c Y N TE C SNp ' � �� 4 C' ° aO ✓✓ W5 E ✓Y VG Yw Y Yw.w.. Y w+Gi +C .OTC 1 Yp .^.NCO N.� aYp ll�Clap +C6 L L O yCp. F V •+ p �i T � `� N� Y R 6. �0� .✓.°.aC OY Y P Y • ^M } V�^4 iO �..ry. Ny .0 Y. � y� C : 6 naaC> V C�•�' GNV ✓Oy nr C K, �✓ YO Y YL O ynN Ty G�B.�C,i g>VN A4 x. �,a NR g TYa1� Gb ML wya o 3yp o °L Y Yq p�3 p o ygMa La i NNCS -as C wh.y a� e p u �OCU O'. 3� V V.Y+ • N.NM,. Ow^. Yeaa `(((��w <�r.m ? ®'�NyCnq N'nN n` <a !.o w KO� ✓Lw "` Y ey« Nom"' yy°CLi.uYQt M`S Y'� I? If AXIS�i V N � vwVi � •�. NI {! J �... N'•N . -C SN 7M0 . IL.MS SN.M��Ni POC OO mow$ w � CN� L�ww✓ ^ aC`■ ° ■n id i �. FY E pp 1� $'". F.aa ida 20 s Vm wNQ. Cy rz Z. MU. 6w.0.`yya G w s .eL@S. '�� +� ►a °►g „NY OY�w•Y ~✓ x ✓N'CL � �4CC.�0 � »C g�w GLN� �VV �O. ~ ✓'i 7+ SG L� ®r" ?+ b+ 9Q°'N X79m 4 Ld M �p�V =VS • Y O✓ ✓G r°. °' NO 6 =�� +YQ.Y AY�Y V�qL E ✓Y VG Yw Y Yw.w.. Y rui ip ✓N n4'C sOCY w V� OY ". L� LAOCC ••.w Ep L O yCp. F V •+ p �i T � `� N� Y R 6. �0� .✓.°.aC OY Y P Y • ^M } V�^4 iO �..ry. Ny wGCy ✓�O y� C : 6 naaC> V C�•�' iVI .{a��► ub � a C -8� at ^ *BY aN 3� V V.Y+ • N.NM,. wC 4 O G �Y„6 G`V r 4L cr.Ono W <�r.m ? iVN N'nN SU <a !.o w KO� <rits ;j,i•vroi �..�. n I{I{ BSI. 6 +�. N� Ij n� w'� •� N � vwVi � •�. NI {! J l •V �a Y 5 s .- s vi ._ o s lit � `�. bx�. .fit }��yy{,�W� :cv Cn� nV � �wo �iI`•�s1�► �.��', � � •p '°60 a OL.N 2LY f YY p+'O pO. yD YJC • �L J. VI.�`.a xCX ^W psi C 4, u 4 NN„ ■ Ya xC : 9 p Yy d YD� 6p� -0Wy YyOY. V °L py! �'DV� �CYm` y� i 4 VY uwY �.'•> M Gyo�. Gu> r�px rMYYy� �a �3 � �o QY.9Q try �U -�Q rjLO LOT Y�.cw yQ +�qy� oa■u+�y� v6 MdCs Yp Oypl$ '•y Pee » CY .tC.... ;TLY OL 3£$$3,, C {{ ■�� pp a— .4i yy M LV N tl i C g «V;Sk ZZQLI A L ea (�= � YRy aiV� A aVK }r ar iL(LN 9 N a ME ,69 CC `VI Y \ r Vl =Mzz Y/L C°i Ko $ V O ` a C4�C Y.m emu. YQ� b` ew wC. •V. .r'. t■ ° OY Y� �.' �. L.6_ Q rV �.rp CVL ii RvY OO.+ 1� EQYa �« X^ '4 q� YLY u 40a i i.NH 0.9� i O TpO �:� pM« y SG LV� TO Y .`.V YZJ YNM p MD ^G GY.LC ~ we =LLS a i 4 rQ'6 tYy� Y�9L� r Lo� Jy IS C C C E S C° U L O• .-,z a$ a+ pp i! Y�5 Yp C yiS4 Y E-32 eyy W1.Z a+ LA, -0y qNG Ztz C 6D ora t2n..r, .G°r,°Y'� voY >r 4Y G° .'. oG Y i r .a ON QC ` NQ LY C ^ 'r NN4I a D` Q�T 0L C �^ TL' E N O .�, S \a G GK .. C Y ± =9^ Y goo. '.a(r 4 r e:HEOGC _�—�� }y4 NY YY Y �«� O..LCD L phew GC• ^. OLy; a� YC.ii !W L� YON r NY Q.r+ pF. (per L. NN � 3.T J LE^ q G aC +G K6Y� D y�Yna U E O 6�� L >Yp M h sw O 1 k- r {v� aV Y~ �V w :h` � � � AWyNYr Y� r9 y,.. 1�I Y i y. T4.tR ♦k 5 f 31 y C C) L yi y Q^'G~ C 4 yT. w�w. %l� •N� ^5 IL_4 w n tlwN� �wq •� VQFrNt4 1 d9 ��yO �pr Y 'Y u 2 � `.S�SpY M 1�� b `.. ��Tn `.O .22 . N !fit e:^ rtjrNy tC a! O�eppeT � d ti _ AYE. � Y Y yS ♦ 4 '�K�..�ip`Q wTxq W�pL CC CC ce Ya+ y' OP v ry`D +Y YYWr V y�N NpO1 U. N Y p. acVe4 •C �• Y' w Ow w N N list YY tvr Q PCtn. O�r '2.LpM tl NCom•'~ p YN�C P' C�..N NN.�..~11 d V o�.g. 4 y•C ��iii �• 3 � '�CQ.N, tlf�VH `�wEg�� VA si w'3� •cag�v¢'iir`< � r � � qs. $.. $. Lw i�`` �1 �uyw�b.Y: :aC O 0 f �O'�wseyj �rM,i� .+H i� KYt►V6 lie+ S O e W J c�a `.0 C ICY G Q t •• CA.4 51 02 Z C~ to 8 �tdw 3 Y jI zs �9 L�� xi y.. L 3L: ej O r Y q N . 4 2 y-aV C i Ewa �r0 L YY `�^ 4f9 SCE Vi=a CQq .QV :Y ' N N o w w.Y w^ O� w � y¢y¢y� w till g Y C�'qq. �v p �Y ♦♦/,,}y}.� I tL— C a^ ��.eetl+YYYi �y Y .ir G�w V.r aN.yx aYYrV OY�VV .N. Erl Ywa °t`c;e.�y N° M c° i Yi wag. Nur -cu �wi•m, ` •�`" i� Qg a _.r " a ear. °� nr$ o b Y$ " g` ^e.M w « °`±.R -•^.." cc�° ....o t1.9 N.d L Cr.+ Or i'G Orr Oy O¢f YY iw,� y�' � t � CyC it YQ YV4 L�iM rLr NwVY. P^ �y TN C Sa. d i) wt«w. L a 000 w w r/1Y9ln w:R <A C G L Nw YY DIIw lre�i Wr.0i4 W H4 aG 4DD a= Si5 .[O. 4Oru p ti �2 1 z_y '-VY Nf F YY �YI Y Iz rC. �V O.C. •. �� - W4 yCy=a Y ♦ Y. yyGp y lS �� —. � L� N C. 40 w i O .�. •C� -aw Vd cny �"` .is iW -g'N �'•" � ..Ni a. �� c Y�ag°.� -e •.A. Sz�v Vi '4 � o� g. p `•�N a Ma T`f" 4 y�u $ °} SY:N gr- S$ c .rte e. S. YW 1a 8 a � siz E . a ye. Y{�. " —. -}— �� y 4C `� Ya( 6Y/yM6 6 4Y �� - °pC AO �y • _�'�. `fig E4 Zb ' �� gva xY N'b. Yx KV 4r WYN b ►V 3• O K� .�. NM yW RRM �w a` y u V �a .W y v . Ob yy C •p �d N� N� M Ut Y b O wY M� C K' .� ew m� TI aN � Y � r ga v C� �M ciA Y ltd O.y p wVL N s <= N ° All < ti w I b �••ru'. t- a ri 1-; + 2 Q 4 40 s ' t: Ca ��` YIIC •`�C�O bYd L Y M bl P+ b Ot W l= $_s r] l t a z k N U G •O L G I KA y! N vN S L _Y Y C ♦,+ a a j. M •y. O s Y � ■(Oy a p ee D O Y ' Y^ N D O• F Y tl^ L S L t D. Al A 6 Cy ic v O N d N• y Y Y. Y s 4 w Y� Y V. O N yy O C_ .c'= =O ■op� ^. a•Y $oi° .t•• �'`' a�dp. a. i aC +L w =VL BOA isa L.CL �•�'N OctyY CO -Y■ v�� y�1Nl� _ pv Ytl E •� O O •,9Y ^'w� ■� NYC.O. yy. 11 fV Y u tl� a LS. OF oo` YV MiCI L Y •CyC. LOCu C LC tl7 YO.Y Y O.JWC SVK �H d 6 • � � l ��I I ��I 1 � I I o II " , r 7 MW —�I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Gucn,�o STAFF REPORT � '; DATE: May 13, 1987 E ? TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission 1977 FROM: Brad Bu11 er, City ;?laniter BY: Bruce Cook, Associate Planner SUBJECT: MODIFICATION TO TRACT 13059 (DESIGN REVIEW) - REPUBLIC - A request to modify the con3i tionz or approval to permit-wood fencing on corner side yards for Tract 13059 (Design Review) F for 137 single family lots on 25.8 acres of land within the &. Victoria Planned Communitv-r (Low - Medium Residential, 4-8 dwelling units /acre) located on the west side of Fairmont k: Lane, north of the Southern Pacific Railroad - APN 202-211 - 13, 38. a I. BACKGROUND: Design Review for Tract 13059 for review of site plan and niii'13ing architecture for the previously approved residential t subdivision was reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission on November 12, 1986. Condition No. 9 of the resolution approving design review for Tract 13059 requires corner side yard fencing for all corner lots to be of a decorative block material. Republic Development, the project developer, has submitted a letter requesting a modification to said Condition No. 9 to permit theca to substitute a wood fence for the required block wall. II. ANALYSIS: Since October of 1986, the Planning Commission's policy has been to require block wal 1 s on the i:arn'er side yards for all tracts within the .City. Since October, a number of residential tracts have been approved by the Planning Commission which have this condition requiring-block walls on the corner side yard of corner lots. This project is located within the Victoria Groves Village:. Of the five projects within Victoria Groves, two have been approved with the requiremeniG for block walls on corner side yards on corder lots, one is in the Design Review process and has been recommended with this condition., one has been approved requiring block walls in some locations but permitting wood fencing; in others, and one was approved without any requirements for block walls vn corner lots (this tract was approved in November, 1985 prior to the Comission policy for block walls on corner lots being established). Refer to Exhibit "A" for a complete summary of the above- described projects, 1 ITEM 0 PLAWING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TRMAT 13059 - REPUBLIC May 13, 1987 Page 2 i Republic Bevelopfaent,- ;is requestinq this modificatio►') to their coadition Of approvdf "' 4ecause tbe` ' wish to use the same design already approved for -.the McCarthy" "Company tract, i.e. Traci` 13060. The McCarthy Company tact is the one exception to this consistent application of block wall requirement on corner, lots allowed try the Planning Comission since October, 1986. Staff originally recommended that block walls on corner lots be required when the McCarthy domes tract was first submitted for design review. McCarthy Homes requested of the Design Review Committee that they be allowed to use wood fencing on corner lots in place of black bigils. Their request was in cons deration of the fact that they felt they had up, ded the architecture beyagd what the City would have normally required and they waisted some.edonomic relief in the construction of prope.!ty fencing. The 'De: f4rl Review Committee felt it was appropriate to allor� an exception to the requirement for block walls an corner lots as a trade -off for the upgraded archfNzcture, but not at the expense, of detracting from the overall `quality of the strestscene. Therefore, the Dasigrt Review Committee recoamended ttf4t wood fen_`,.,_nnly be allowed on certain corner lots, i.e. Lots 71 -72 and 82 -83., These lots are located on a clr,sed cul- de=sac loop that will be traveled by relatively small numbers of pimple living on V:cse streets. The block wall . equirement was ., maintained for lots 8, 13, and 14. These corner lots would be subjected to a much higher uoltuse of traffic, and tilerefare a greater visual element to the streetscere. The P146„.,14 'Omission ,approved the project as recoomended by the Cosign Review Coasiittee, Tract 15059 (Design fi Wew) was approved by the Pl .-,ruing Commission with the requiremont for' block walls on the corner- side yards of all corner lots. Republic Development is requesting a modification to this condition to allow them to use wood fencing instead. Their justification is that the Planning Conuaission permitted wood fencing in the McCarty tract *n corner lots, and that to maintain consistency Republic should also be allowed the W-e of wood fencing. On a more careful analysis, however, in comparison of the two projects, the affected lots in the Republic tract side on to streets subject to higher voluiaes of traffic in a manner similar to the situation in McCarthy for which the corner lots were required to have block walls. Therefore, in consideratica of consistency a application it is appropriate that corner side yard fencing on ali corner lots in the Republic development be required to be block.' 0_'o _'o y PLANalp' c 1�a3' '? S�i;RFF REST TRACT I''�` RpUB 1C Page 3 _ III. RECU*ENQATION: Staff recommends that, to maintain consis *ency with es a s ie pricy for tesidenti4l development providing truck walls on the corner side `'yaM on corr"cr lots for all single family developments throughd�t the City, that the Planning Commission deny ., this request for modification through adoption of the .?attached Resolution. Resoeotfully s bm;tted,_ C x Brad Iles City Planner BB: BC: to Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Victoria Groves Vi` I rige Exhibit "B" - Tract 13059 Exhibit "C" - Tract 13060 exhibit "D" - Wad Fence S,nrcl cation Detail Letter of Request for Moth .1 cati on Resolution of Qenial I i I It RA 0—- P i. �a ®gd�� _T i 1�4 �4 �ra a 1� 1' a Q• i. Cl) IW °d" O LU Y e ® < r1 r9 O !8e � u P6 � J - uas gR u o VAL& Raw mar e��lir�T T'gt�oa'ctvsxt`(` sk Js+Opp �. 'Sp - �soer•aG os 'ta �"''ih�Gtil�S't!6'� f � ? l � -- ( �iV• �1�� '��r.xtSZ�•d' Tca bb ve � � . as R • tu K • - ,. to r . 37 R•CRQMAM .CAUi� � -- r � I Y SOUTHF)iN f>Af_11iG. RAt� ;— ... .. Td 3059 —��— °i � 1 lcLtl i•roU ifGPA►Crt3eA WciafrEt+c,u4 DY.Srcx NORTIi CITY OF T , TE:Le..`°'` ' Y RANCHO CU 'NZONGA T1TLE- PLANNING DIVISIC kN, +s �t EXHIBIT ; — ALE: i I/. IN EE , • a N (" •� v C rk ctini c c "L`_" �6 ! 3G4 Li AK .... � n L • T•N 4 •. �i !i �j� L � 4 `+• j Y r� .fy (�q� � J� .........itututttetasi Ul � E= Zt4 •1 a # U W w F �' c ! r r art. t rtt -! +�; # • 1 a ,; i LU CL 1t as, iri/ ai. 'iti ai A a ! it C — r6 #r }! # re !r f a #t! ft , 4 +]a.+,fit 1 a n � Y rC,'i � m2 -. " ' �. .F►,}�fy p LU t i c r4a L a ® e } (i for • F + !! _ 8 } ' � N #' is nt a °f` t �itQtrty r *� !. l cc o ul .✓ �>r��' : � + ii" .2 � .^.. Imo° �t Ij Vx 4" RAIL 2 "x 6" CAP 4 "x 4 POST. i "x 4" RAIL., e i +4 j 5 +--61F (Hi IGi) WOOD FENCE (T'YP.) NOTE: WOOD PENCE TO `RECEIVE WHITE WASH STAIN (ONE COAT) STREET SIDE ONLY. VICTORIA POINTS REPUBLIC DEVELOPMENT COMPANY TRACT NQ. 13059 CITY OF ITF.M= MOD -ro All, 1b RANCHO CUC-AiVl0N,GA TITLE, PLANNING DIVI laN �-�C`� EXHIBIT; SCALE- - F jl 1467 N Wanda. Suite t55- Orange. CA. 92667 ,714, 533 48 -! +�- ' :d RL*H�� -- RECCivr -, 3-- 4 CIIY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Ci9 PtANNINQ DIVIS{ON APR I 198 u - AM PM 2's��9slt�tii��:s s,��14t�s6 April 16' 1987 ;t :s a Mr. Bruce Cook City of Rancho C',iyKmonga 9320 Baseline RoLa, Ste. C P.O. BOX 807 Rancho Cucamonga, ')",A 91730 Re: Tract No. 13059 Corner Sideyard Fencing Dear Bruce. ' We hereby request a ...aefication to our design review for Tract 13059, pertaining to Section 2, Condition No. 9, regarding the corner sideyard f�csng. The condition presently requires all corner lots to be built of decorative black material. we would like to substitute decorative blockk material with a wood design the per specifications shown on the attached fencing study rendering, and the sample model which will be presented at the Design Review Meeting on 4- 16-87. ` Please find attached a plot plan showing the 12 locations where the proposed substitutions would occur. The reasons for the change are as follows: 1. The interior sideyard fencing is a ;good design. A wood design on the interior corners will be more compatible. 2. The McCarthy Co. is building adjacent to our project and is using a wood design on all corner siddyard fencing& we plan to coordinate our design with their design. �I F jl 1467 N Wanda. Suite t55- Orange. CA. 92667 ,714, 533 48 -! +�- ' :d �{ O.ity of Rar^;ho: Cucamonga Page 2 of 2 ? a 1, �t 3 The return fencing at these locationsare designeid,.!n wood. Wood-t% the corners would allow 'the Fencing to be built with the: same material and stain to match: 9. The quality of design along with the white wash stain finish will ,Previft a long lasting and t attractive looking, corner sideyard fence. For the above reasons we regUest approval of the Design, l Review Committee for this W)dif cation. ` Sincerely, REPUBLIC DEVELOPMENT Co` I Rog D. Wilson Sales and Marketing Manager RDW:dp Attachments cc: Steven Ford - William Lyon Company William Moore - McCarthy Co. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION DENYING A REQUEST TO MODIFY THE V,ONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. TO PE*11 1 WOOD FENCING ON CORNER SIDE YARDS FOR TRACT 13059 (DESIG! REVIEW). WHEREAS, on the 16th day of April, 1987, a modification was filed by Republic Development Co., for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 13th day of May, 1987, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above- aescribed project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: The !,Manning Commission makes the following findings in regard to'-V91s request for modification: 1. This request is not consistent with established policy for residential development of providing block walls on the corner side yards on corner lots for all singles family developments throughout the City. denied. SECTION 2: Modification to Tract 13059 (Design Review) is hereby ° APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF MAY, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Butler, epu y ecre ary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning C;lmmission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoi11' Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the'Planning Commission heir! on the 13th day of May, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: CGrAISSIONERS: is ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: a-)1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA � �f ~ � ` ^ � tZ TO: Chairman and Members of the FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Designer SUBJECT:� Staff is attached m 'with several locatons slated for upcominu construction ~ '" "= ^ vn^/ proposed /ou^�xnns are as follows: � -_ Standaid Monumention ` �. h '- Westerly -.�� 19th Street , Southerly °.^v -_^ "=�*ro°,�nue \i ' Gateway Mcnomentation !`^ � Southerly _- 'i~ . � � Southerly City limit, .~ ^ Mi'tliken Avenue Two location5,' the Standard entry on Baseline at the westerly City limit and the Gateway entry on ArchibE-,�d, at the F3utherly City limit have been previously approverf''and thus 4,�11 set a design City —~ -- ---~~~�~~ this surmer ' It follows that the remaining entry ~«//s should project a oonsfstant image. ` While the additional proposed locations will follow the normal ~ Capital Improvement Project approval sequence, there are two looat"''" in - particular which require an op-front concurrence at this point The Gateway locations at th �h st ^ have received design approvals for development-oriented walls. As the ''-' is ,^~^^'^w to '`",."e * cv"s`stanz x identity on program, developers should be cautioned not -� �^ - or energy on projects that overlap with those 'vffurther i -^ `~^^` direction can he given upon oval of ''� City. Planning Commission and City Council. Th�'--^ '~~~~'~^^ ~x """` "'" n . i, would only be * location | approval and final designs would be processed separately. v ^ I 'I[MS Page 2 Approval May 6, 1987 Recommendation It is recommended that the Planning Commission approve the Haven and Milliken igncations for Gateway entry monumention and forward a Ms, recommendation to the City Council. Respe submitted, x.. u �1 wry Il City Engineer LP :jh Attachments: Memoi�ndum c S, f I f AOL 9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: April 6, 1981 T0: Lauren Wasserman, City Manager FROM; Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Laura Psomas, Landscape Designer " / p es gner C�CAI,j( � � z is's SUBJECT: City Identity Monumentati on: current status and suggested program for future implementation. Concerns over City entry monumentation has prompted a review of approved levels of monumentation, followed with a recommended City -wide implementation rogram. Two (2) projects featuring entry monument walls are scheduled to begin construction in early summer. The projects and .the types of monumentation are as follows: Major Gateuray HCOM ntation will be constructed at 4th St.,eet and Archibald Avenue. The rock wall design (see exhibit A) draws on local history and was approved by the Planning Commission and City Council. Standard Entry !MornaWtation will be constructed on Baseline Road at the Westerly city boundary. This corrept (sec exhibit 8) was approved by the Planning Commission and City Council as a typical perimeter entry statement. Given that these two types of walls will soon be in place and-setting a "theme ", it fa lows that subsequent entry wails (other major gateways in Particular) appropriate c design ngo nly through use of uniform s n elements a visitors to Rancho Cucamonga be greeted with a consistant "image" of our City. A local program for —entry identity monumentation is attached for consideration (see exhibit C). This program is be based on a consistant design concept to reinforce the City's image, and should apply to both public and private projects. Those monumentation walls not built in conjunction with adjacent private development can be• constructed with Beautification funds, and we wiil be proposing locations for construction in the 81/88 Capital Budget. It should be noted that entry monunentation on Foothill Boulevard will be implemented in accordance with the Foothill Boulevard Specific plan. RHM :LP :dlw S -3 EXH1B, r A ACCENT Q CAOUNU COYER TURF ,I nA.4, Ar;ENt sK, uss VERTICAL R �1 �tRE ES STREET i YREES ✓' . SCAM. I• as MAJOR GATEWAY EXHIBIT B rxy. Inoo Ll J-11 vesneu t CAP calxrurf mss;,, ' CITY LOGO lYETAL Fun OR TILM LOW A,AKTWII W" KNUMN WAN. a w VAVAnCH MAJOR GATEWAY EXHIBIT B rxy. Inoo Ll J-11 E PROPOSED ENTRY MONUMENT WALL. LOCATIONS ' 0lR�ERE OF IMPLUttJICE i ED i i HI •Ip � SYMBOL DESCRIPTION MAJOR GATEWAY ENTRY MONUMENTATION A strong visual statement, located on both sides of selected arterials into the City. STANDARD ENTRY MONUMENTATION A smaller scale entry Hall, to be located or c ^e side of the street. at City boundaries. FOOTHILL. BLYD, ENTRY MONUMENTATION Implemented through the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. S J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA mr- D E E ly CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ST"F REPORT �� CV�'fOtic a } O p U > 1977 DATE: May 13, 1987 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Comaissien FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Community Development Director BY: Linda D. Daniels:, Senior Redevelopment Analyst SUBJECT: REVIEW! OF ON SITE CONSTRUCTION SIGN FOR THE PROPOSED VICTORIA GARDENS REGIONAL SHOPPING MALL I. BACKGROUND: In 1984 an Owner Participation Agreement (OPA) between , NFA associates and the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment_ Agency was approved. This OPA related to the development of a six- anchor regional shopping center at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and the I -15 freeway. Recently HFA Associates requested the Redevelopment Agency to approve a 36 month time extension for construction of the Victoria Gardens shopping mall. As part of the conditions of approval the Redevelopment Agency required the developer to install an on site construction sign which advertises the project and has a freeway orientation. The Hahr, Company, a partner of HFA Associates, has submitted to staff a proposed on site construction s'-)n advertising the proposed Victoria Gay ^dens shopping center. II. ANALYSIS: The Rancho Cucamonga Sign Ordinance requYre's that all signs relating to the deveT lent of a regional shopping center be reviewed by *'.:e Planning' lmmission. Although this is not a permanent sip,,.w it does 6 .ectly relate to the proposed Victoria Gardens Mill. The sign has been designed using a Spanish style theme so as to be compatible with the proposed architecture of the mall. The sign is a freeway oriented "L" shape configuration constructed of wood and having a river rock base. Due to the freeway orientation, the overall sign dimensions are 28 feet high and 25 feet wide. The total sign copy area is approximately 120 square feet. The sign is to be located approximately 1150 feet north of Foothill , Boulevard and approximately 150 feet west of the west right of way property line of the I -15 freeway. This location may be adjusted . slightly during the installation of the sign in order to maximize"" i.. site distances. ITEM T - J " ,;] PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Review of On Site Construction Sign /Proposed Victoria 'Gardens Regional Shopping Mall May 13, 19$7 Page 2 ` Due to the unique nature of a regional shopping center development and its freeway orientation, the Sign Ordinance does not set out any specific standards which must be followed in terms of heigktp widfh, and a1lowabla sign copy area. Although there is t;J - established �iteria, which must be met, it is required that the f. sign be appropriately designed and that the dimensions and copy bear relationship to the purpose and proposed location. Staff has_reviewed the sign and feels that is in keeping with the ,£ standards`'and intent: of the Sign Lode. The design there of the sign is reflective of the design program for the cee,1r. TWe: overall dimensions of'the sign, including the area for.�lgn copy, r, appear to be appropriate due to the sign being -orienten = maximize ' freeway exposure. The sign message is in keeping with,),the Sign Code in that it includes only the minimal amnunt of information necessary to advertise the project and hnw to rbtain more information. Once the center,-,is devbloped, a permanent sign will be designed which will replace thin proposed sign. The permanent monument sign, as well as the sign program for the center, will be reviewed by the Nlanning-Sommission as well. III. RECOMMENDATIONe Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the proposed on site construction sign for the proposed Victoria Gardens Center. t - Respectfully submitted, fl s La!m, AIC , Community Development Director JL:LD:kap Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Map of Proposed Sign Location Sign Elevation Sign Plan. View l; E EXHIBIT4 "A' Neap of Site "Non locakim Miller AV*. 00 Vlctoclo Loo e is Qe Foothill Br PROJECT SITE ti :ag ua r fftt = 3 + r o _ Vl '�iza =. {? -; .. {.s.a.ars ...r, •��`-tR =-s� rte • ... _.. t ..� -, • ,i h � � ��1 f .10 -ti ai M�A MMOA j7LOI. vim