Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1987/06/10 - Agenda Packet
Ag da 22" o 81, p 6.06(l c� CITY OF 21 -A z AGENT)A o PL,ANNIiNG C®j�/INIISSION WEDNESDAY " JUNE 10, 1987 7:00 p.m. LIONS PARS COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA L Pledge of Albgianee U. Roll Cain ' Commissioner Blakesiey_ Commissioner Einerick Commissioner Chitiea Commissioner McNiel Commissioner Tolstoy III. Approval of Minutes April 8, 1987 April 29, 1987 IV. Anaouneements V. Consent Calendar The fo.'owing Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concerrrover any item, it should bs removed for discussion. A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87; -05 - LUSK COMPANY - A proposal to kslid a Q,070 square oof speculative industrial building on .69 acres of land in an Industrial Park District, Subarea -a, located on the north side of ` iademark Street east of Center Street - APN 210- 381 -05. B. APPROVAL OF ADVERTISING SIGN FOR PROPOSED VICTORIA GARDEli 3 REGIONAL SHOPPING CENTER Vi Public Hearings The following ziterr, are public hearings in which cor -erned individuals ma* ,.o'ce their, opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions Shalt be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each projeaL 9 ;l ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT 86 -37 - KEITH Cl?i4iPAPiMUSK COMP:F XY -- „VIEW ie development of a Master Plan or a . 79.1'1 acre industrial park consisting of 33 lots in an Indu�tatd Park ' District, Subarea 16, located at the northwest quadrant of 4th Street and Archibald Avenue - APN 210 - 062 -02, 11, 13, 26, 32 and 33. (Continued from jNay 13, 1987). ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE' PARCEL MAP 143.93 - 1{EIT_H COMPANYy l 'SK COMPANY - A subdivision o , 9.2 acred :of land into 33 parcels in the Industrial Park", trii�t,.SubareBlS, 1 <acated at the northwest comes e*f 1;' ibald Avenue and Fourth Street - APN 210 -062 -18fi 11, 6i,26, 33 and 32. (Continued from May 13, 1987). ;; } j� D. ENVIRONMENTAIL ASSESSMENT AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 13634- WILLUM LYON COMPANY - A total residential development of 306 condominium unTts on 24.67 acres of land in the Medium (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) and Medium -High (14-24 dwelling units per acre) Residential Districts within the Victoria Planne3 Community, located at the northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Milliken Avenue - APN 202- 211 -13 and 14. (Continued from May 13, 1987), E. LY10DIFICATION TO TENTATIVE TRACT 12902 -- AORDIC - A - request to r;- odifl, a condition of approval rz tu'ring a Community Equestriat; Trail on the west side of the drainage course for a e;xstom lot subdivision of 28 lots on 39.7 acres of land in the Very Low Density Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner cf Hermosa Avenue and Almond Street - APN 201 - 071 -05, Ob, 25, 26, 35 and 36. F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE �yi P!.1iCEL AP 10144 - BARTON DEVELOPMENT - A subdivision of 12.68 acres of land into 3 parcels in , the Industrial Paris (Subarea 7), located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Spruce Avenue - APN z08 -351- 23. G, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TEtJtATIVE PARCEL IVIAP 10295 - LEWIS HUMES - A subdivision of Ank 16.12 acres of land into 4 parcels in the Terra Vista Planned Cominunity located on Elm Avenue, west of Milliken Avenue - APN 1077 - 421 -16, 13. .r. 'c H. ENVIRONMENTAL j VD TENTATIVE ,7 TRACT 13476 - W&WAMS PR,OPEii.Ti CtitCSUI`TANTS A residentiaL subdivision-of 37 lots on 9.7 acres iflanndd in the Low Residential District (2-4 dweliing units per acre) located an the' "Portheast corner of HP,llnlan :Avenue and' Tryon Street - 4 addition, the applicant has fUed a Tree Removal Permit) -APN 208-111 -04. I. CONDITIGXAL USE PERMIT 87 -18 - EDWARDS RANCHO C CAMI?NGA TREATER - TFe proposed addition o Z2 amusement devices in an existing- recreational facility located in the General Commerci District, 7988 Haven , Avenue _ APN 1077 - 661 -07, and 08. 4 J. TIME EXTE14SION AND MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONS - PARCEL MAP 5786 - CROWELL BROTHERS --A- modification to add a condition for utility undergrounding : -_ and a request for an extension of time for the project located at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and : Carnelian Street, -= APN 207- 0.°1. -28. K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 87 -01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An amendment to modify the Etiwanda Speci is Plan as follows: Figure 5 -18 "Community Trails ", ` by relocating the Community Equestrian Trail to the south side of 24th Street east of the Loop Road; Figure 5 -19 "Improved Sidewalks ", to eliminate the sidewalk on the south side of 24th Street, east of the Loop; Road, and Figure 5 -35 1124th Street, Erst of Loop", to show a 96 foot - street right -of -way siih a 20 foot Community Equestrian Trail on the south side parkway. VII. Nerr Business L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMEFT REVIEW 87 -10 - SOUTHWEST SAVINGS - A proposal to construct a two-story office/bank building of 9,000 square feet in the Neighborhood Commercial District located at the northeast corner of Base Line Rcad and Archibald Avenue - APN 202- 731 -08. M. CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN DESIGN I 1 VH)L Wr- eetoes i2eJ.wrts N. RESULTS OF APRIL 29, 1987 UTILITY UNDER- GRO!UNDIMO WORKSffOP 0. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PAGJECTS BIJDGFT ,VL , Cam Wsslon BwCmess DESIGN RFVIEWr OIVIWITTEE ROTATIONS X. Publie Comments This is the time and place for the gervral public to, address the Commission. Items to be discussed P-re are those WkIch do not 4�l already appear on this agenda. XL Acijou mment f ThO Planning Commission has adopted ! ,idmitnistrativa ite# lcei�a: v that set an 1I p.m. adjournment,tzme. If items bey ?nd that tine, they shall be heard only witzt the consent, � the Gommissian. � ....... . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ............. ................ --- M_ _ SPHERE OFINFLuance HA LBIDJ -Xll LQB- VC RA suml it 0 THIL . FA I EWAY yr rotas as asa.3sf oz, HIG HL ND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA mr- a,iq a yr zttvvVF1V t1vVt11Y�Vi°iizil G CALfO STAFF RE "ORT��� tom, DATE: June 10, 1981 TO: Chalr�an and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner 8Y: Chris Westman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -05 - LGSK Ci UMANY --A proposal to buff1da- 9,010 square toff speculative indistrial building on .69 acres of land in an Industrial Park District,, Subarea 6, located on the north side of Trademark Street east of Center Street - APN 210 381 -05, I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Issuance of a Negative Declaration B. Surrounding_ Land Use and Zoning: or vacant; area South - Office; Subarea 6 East - Light Industrial; Subarea 6 West - vacant; Subarea 6 C. General Plan Designations: ro3ec e - nfu'�ra"P ark North - Industrial Park South - Industrial Park East - Industrial Park West - Industrial Park D. Site Characteristics: The site is vacac.t and there is no si gnTri can ve etation. . Street improvements have been completed along Trademark Street. The project to the east, also developed by the Lask Company, is of similar site design and architectural character E. Parking Calculations: No. of No, of Type of Square Parking Spaces Spaces Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Office /Light/ Industrial 9,070 425,E 20 27 I /50o ITEM A A-L PLANNING COi?IMISSION STAFF REPORT OR 87 -05 -•LUSK COMPANY June 10, 1987 v; Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: A. General`: The project is intended as a speculative light n- i'-9usaI building. It is proposed as the third; in a series I of similar light industrial buildings. approval of the , `lpon Negative Oeclaration the City Planner will grant final approval of the project based on conditions recommended by the Design and Technical Review Committees. B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Chitiea, WNW, an o amen previewed the projett on May 21, 1987 and recommendlpd that it be 'Commission' forwarded to the Planning with the following conditions: 1. That the southern most parking stall be removed in order to provide a 25 foot minimam stacking depth . at the drive entry, 2. That the landscaping be consistent witli the those projects directly to the east. it ,r C. Environmental A.cG.essment: Parts I & II of the Initial Study have been comp a R and-no significant impacts have been fount' related to the construction of the proposed building. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: - The proposed use is consistent with the Genera an an n ustrial Specific Plan. The building design and site plan together with recommend conditions of approva , are in compiiance with the Industrial Specific Plan and all other, applicable City Standards. IV. RECOKMENDATION :. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission' issue a .agave Declaration for Development Review 87 -05. Re tful bmi ted, Brad City Planner BB:CW:sgr Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Elevations "D" Exhibit - Grading Plan A-L f.��c34V y� 4 J Q 111 o Li - vIGff•IiT?' i NURTH CITY OF T r RANCHO CL yli�,N, i TITLE= PANNING DIviSm EXHIBIT: SCALE- �/aGr. e1T �AGrICIGU LTN�.ML/) J L.JM.IO$ _. � � ZWLcaV uOMT P/.9`Tr -r, as IAWYv ^�'71GySJbMt�16R _ k M -- b�wwcm-,j yf - -- 9r _ -u. L-1 ' p �erEr,�Fu �NSC.rs at.1f, "curo,• °mc Hic+G�1G 3 6 tiFia ' � p�� 1 f •- m. i �P3u L.14 ! W�IGr N »C t - . • l/.wI NMLL -.-�.r �- `� � . 9•w _• EIIT<y Tlu b4J.RO TYPE TUiE�_. N A "so 1131W r � N STMAI 1 Reuv6 a1STJV F.N. . V �RTH CITY OF ITEM: RANCHO C..TCjA,,iVjON,CsA TITLE: PLANNING DIV51ON ExHtIMr- SCALE . � : --.�_ A-4 uy .} Sui.lAaasTV L. iGaf/1@. TL74�' 4uV0ik7RA1. � r r" i _ }1- a�l,autc t cTecc..w17 _ _ - _ • '3�'IJT, c,cvr -r�o� t vAhi t µwtS. I:alLW .4LIL Ti .9Y10i4�TRi0 r P#H - - Wl87 ILYi.W'rl�s,�'� �-- �IAi111fP UDC tR T 'fi.i' /i:JI�tIIOAAI 1 r,� �NORTH CITY OF T ITEMt R ANCHt:� CLCA1r1O'NG TrIU. -• FLA,NNItiC BT`'I5EON EXHtBiT: - ._ SCA ,.K Y Ca1T�tNtlR TO �� ,q &A'tW/i AWA 40.r,: le /4'S`.!n'f t f) jfF' __� onvfw .sst4 /� AS/W L /MC°C1°A6V/ 4w /11f 7f+): AK. JK1C�. 4 ✓ V FORTH !! CITY OF RANCHO CI..'Ct'�i '' tTE1rI, ®� iNvIa +'GA TITLE:. PLA.NNI.tiG DIVISION EXHIBIT; SCALE =--140_ A-L 11 11 CITY OF RAN/4230 CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT G�mp M 7 DATE-. June 10, 1987 0 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planninn Commission FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Community Development Director BY: Linda D. Daniels, Senior Redevelopment Analyst SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF ADVERTISING SIGN FOR PROPOSED VICTORIA GARDENS REGIONAL SHOPPING CENTER BACKGROUND. In Apri'i 1987 the Rr;developmei Agency approved a 36- month extension to Owner Participation /Agreement (OPA) 84 -1 which involves the Regional Shopping Center. As part of this extension approval, the Agency required the dEvel'oper to design and install a construction adv 'gx�tising sign for the project. The Agency required that this sign be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commisiion prior to its installat ,,.. In May the P'ianning Commirsion re- iiewed a submittal by The Hahn Company for the required sign. At that time the Planning; Commission requested that the sign be directed to the Design Review Board for review and comment before being considered by the Planning Commission. ANALYSIS: On June 4, 1987, The Hahn Company presented a construction advertising sign to the Design Review Board for their consideration. The proposed sign had been revised by The Hahn Company based on comments received from the Destan Review Committee at their meeting of May 21, 1987. The Committee re, .ewed the revised sign, its size, design, location, colors and materials. Th3 overall height of the sign is 44 feet. The width of the sign is 38 feet. The colors of the lettering are blue and green with the background being a very light green. The structural members will be a weather- treated redwood (natural -color wood color). The sign also includes a 4 -foot high rock base. The sign ordinance specifically identifies all regional shopping center signs to be approved by the City because of their uniqueness. The sign size and height is in scale with the freeway and the site the Hahn Company has taken measurements and grade differences between the site and the freeway aid has found that a 14 -foot difference in elevation exists. Thus, the sign is intentionally taller to compensate for this change in elevation so that the sign copy can be seen by freeway drivers. The Committee felt that propertion.tely the height of the sigr.was in scale with the width as well. ITEM a r,,i1j _� ire PLANNNG'ZOMMI"SSION sTAPF `REPORT . Advertising StgnJPronosed Victoria Gardens Regional Shopping Center June 10, 1987 Page 2 The,, sign will be sited approximately 1000 feet :,orth of Footh -111 Boulevard. - The sign will be located along the freeway right of way and will meet all 0F the locational and visibility requirements established by Cal '.raps. The members concurred that `he sign, which has been modified to meet,, the recommendations of the Design Review Committee, is appr)priately designed and should be recoMended for approval to the Planning Commission. RECOMMENDATION: Staff rec,.ommends that the Planning Commission approve the proposed victoria Gardens onstruction advertising sign, Respectfullybmitteu, Jack Lam, AICP' Community Development Director JL:LD:kap Attachments: Sign Design Sign Plan r E' ., di e, V1 124�. .I� p $! LN xz 1 1 II �. �i• ill y; y4 f0 � 4a �j f� E-1 I. DATE; TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: rY OF RANCHO CUCA,MQNGA c;LCatiaa STAFF EPORT y r. 0 1 U Q1� 1977 June 10, 1987 Chairman and'Membr-rs of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Nancy Fong, Associate Planner EN $RONMENTAL ASSES,%ENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEN 86 -37 - E `tR�tr:ZZiPS C�iPkR,, - The oeve opmen o a"f+ ster asn or a a :re industrial park consisting of 33 lots i'.n an industrial' Park District, Subarea 16, located at the northwest quadrant of, 4th Street and Archibald Avenue - APN: 21u- 6c -02, 119 13, 26 32, and 33. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 10393 - su vision' o acres o land � in o 33 par ^.e1`s in the Industrial Park District, Subarea 16, located at the northwest copner of Archibald Avenue and Fourth Street APR: 210- 062 -13, 11, 02, 26, 33 and 32. I. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission, at its regular meeting, of a�fy 137 1987 conducted -a p,-hlc` hearing to consider the -above described -W ects. The Planning Commission made determinations that criteria should be established in the Master Plan for shared access between parcels consistent with City's Policy; ar, for special design consideratiope in areas of building massing and landscape treatment• at the orner of 4th Street and Archibald Avenue. The applicant at the meeting stated that they agreed to work with' staff in establishing such criteria. With the applicant's consent, the Planning Commis ;ion continued the project to this regular meeting. The applicant again is requesting for continuation of this project and the related Parcel Nap 10393 as stated in the attached letter. Based on a phohe conversation with the applicant, they need more time to develop the abovs. required criteria and to submit them for Design Review Committee .review. Therefore they would like to continue this project for 90 days acid waive the time limit required for processing this project. ITEM C Pi_A.VN1t�POMMlOi STAFF REPORT lt� OR 85 -037. KEETii Co /i.;,% COMPANY - 74a, dime 10",190, Page 2 I xT REC0h9MENDAT W— Staff pecomnends that jPlaisw ipg Commission continue is pra ec including the Parc21 Map 10393:' o, September 9. 1987 reoulaY "meeting Res: per idly submitted. i^ l f 0 zwu . a / Ci±y QYanner p .. BB:NF:vc J Attachments: Letter of Rquest fi=om Applicant j •_ r 1 k lip THE LUSK COMPANY � May 29, 1987 frIH�,2 1941 'gym ' Q�,} Nancy Fong CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Planning Division Box Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 I RE PM 10393, DR $e -37 Dear Nancy: The Lusk Company respectfully � y res p y re quests a continuation of the Planning Commission meeting scheduled for June, 198*r. We agree to waive the time limit requirement statate for approving our Parcel Map and 1',%ster Plan. We appreciate your help in this matter. If you have any ques- tions concerning this request, please feel free to call me. Th,.Nnk you for your cooperation. Vera truly yours, THE LUSK COMPANY. Cawol L. Piwano Project Manager Industrial Division CLP:sf 276154 G21met Aaic. +TcTtua Imdsutr�st Comgtet P.0,8L :%19694 #h w-- CA94728 6019 Ph�aet 72iJA6Y -64!9 • TPrltez� DtnCntDiai 1Iumbczt 71�J250^, .. y 1. Iriit; 'a 0 FROM: The husk Company 'in, City of Rancho�Cucamonga i Planning Division y , P.O. Box 807 Rancho:Cucamonga, California 91730 SUBJECT• , Gentlemen: It is hereby requested that the time limits for processing our above - described project be extended for 90 days. We hope that this extension will enable us to address and resolve the problem areas previously outlined by the City of Rancho Cucamcnga. i Sincerely, a� 0 / gnature fib attT e C-4 I I • IAy j 14 CITY OF &ANCHP � UGAMONGA STAB' "J PORT o — U GATE: June 10, 1987 i9,7 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: < Scott Murphy, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSM-4 NT AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 1.3634 WIC'L YON - . tal res en is eVe ap-en OT con om n uar units on. 24.67 acres of land in the Medium (8 -14 dweiling units per acre) and Medium -Ri:gh (1.4- 24 dwelling units per acre) Residential Districts within the Victoria Planned Community. located at the northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Milliken Avenue - APN 202- 211 -13 and 14. Staff is in receipt of a letter from the applicant requesting that this item be withdrawn from consideration. No further action is requiree by the Planning Commission. Res ully s itted, le C BB:SM:te Attachments: Exhibit "4" Letter from Applicant ITEM 0 i �01WILLUN-M LYON 8540 ARCHIBALD, SUtTt 8, RANCHO CUCAMON;5A. CA 90i�O (714) 980-2244 I I June 4,1987 _ Scott Murphy i a City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 �I Tenative Tract 13634 Victoria Bluffs Dear Scott: Please withdraw the current sub7_c?tl for this project from the Planning Commission agenda. We are preparing a new product and program for this site. Thank you for your input and assistance in processing the current submittal. We will look forward to working with yon on our new project on this site. 5e ReFord Project Manager SF:sn REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT El DATE: 7O: FROM: BY: SUBJECT•. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT U X tor. i June 10, 1987 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Scott Murphy, Assistant Planner MODIFICATION TO TENTATIVE TRACT 12902 - NORDIC A request to modify, a con i ion of approval requiring a Community Equestrian Trail on the want side of the drainage course for a custom lot''subdivision of 29 lots on 39.7 acres of land in the Very Lur, Density Residential Distract (Less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of Hermosa Avenue and Alnond Street - APN 201 -071- 05, 16, 25, 26, 3E and 36. I. BACKGROUND., On April 23, 1986, the Planning Commission reviewed and approved Tentative Tract 12902. A condition of approvai for the tract required that a Community Equestrian Trail be provided on the west side of the drainage course that traverses the site from north to southwest. Amid much discussion at the public hearing, the Planning Conviission stated the importance of providing the train on the west side of the drainage course in order to preserve one of the fern aesthetic trails in the community. The Eucalyptus grove in this location is a unique and special feature of the City which should be available to the entire community. Also, by locating the trail on the west side of the drainage course, greater - separation would be provided between the residences and the equestrian trail thus providing greater privacy for the residents. Another issue discussed by the Planning Commission related to the maintenance of the Community Trail. The Commission felt that the trail should be left as close to its natural state as possible with minimal or no grading and that only selected trees be removed to provide safe passage. The Commission stated that the trail should not be constructed to meet the Community Trail Standards. Rather, the details should be wormed out with the Trails Advisory Committee prior to recordation of the final map. Subsequently, the applicant appeared the Cormunity Trail requirement to the City Council. On June 4, 1986, the Council heard the appeal by the applicant and denied the request; the Community Trail is to be provided on the wrest side of the drainage course. ITEM E 'i PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TRACT 12402 - NORDIC ,tune 10, 1907 Page 1I. ANALYSIS: In preparation of the final alignment for the Community Trail, In e 4oplicant has indicated that to locate the trail on the west side of the drainage course would require extensive grading and the use of retaining walls at the northern portion of the site. As a result, the applicant proposed to relocate the trail to the east side of drainage course. III. TRAILS AOVISORY COWIiTEE: On May 20, 1987, this latest proposal was .revIewe by e ra7`' -s Advisory Committee. The Committee stated that locating the,;tiail entirely on the east side was not desirable because the j,Jtrail would pass very close to two residential units ( a sfparatiofi of 17 feet). The Committee also felt that the grading a,id retaining walls necessary to locate the trail on the west sidu of the drainage course tat the iorthern portion of the site) would destroy the aesthetic character and value of the area which is inconsistent with the intent of the condition. As a result, the Trails Advisory Committee reeowntimdad that from the southerly tract boundary the Community Tail be located on the east side of the drainage course until it approaches the northern portion of Lot 7. The trail should then cross over to the west side of the drainage course and continue northerly to the area of Lot 25. At that point, the trail should again Bross over the drainage course to the east side extending to the northerly tract boundary. By doing so, the trail can be located to preserve the natural state of the area. While relocating the trail to the east side does decrease the distance between residences and the train, a :minimum distance of 45 feet between the residences and the trail should provide adequate buffering between the two uses. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in the Daily Report newspaper and ll property owners within 300 feet off— €ie prodec have been notified. Y. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planting Commission modify ConUffifbn 5 under Planning Division of Re wlution 8641 through adoption of the attached Resolution. Respe• fully,st fitted, Brad Su er City P anner BB:$M :sgr L -11 ` pLANNMG COMMU ON STAFF REPORT TRACT 12902 : NORDIC 1 . M. dune 10, 1987 Page 3 , a Attachments: letter from Applicant Exhibit "A" -Trail Alignment as Required by Resolution 85 -41 Exhibit 'B" - Revised frail Alignment as Recommended `Dj the Trails Advisory Committee (May 20, 1987) �, Resolution, No. 05-41 ;,gesolut-ion ¢i approval to Modify Condition l l I �f Tx 1 k Mal, 22;18$7 �� y Utz!® SURVI =iIfN _ LAND PfMIVING Mr. Scott Murphy 1 is City of Rancho Cuounange 9320 Base Line Road Suite C Rancho Cucumonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Murphy: 18-1 ri>d Vii, WIs of Rernaoats rtes ... *• { g +• Please eo r thin Fetter a ro ast for ar_s,�cari s + '11 ail . which is a cac�t€oa a� `ate appanrak of i..f ' , 290 rnra« Westerly Alignment," tot an alipma vt App"Wa& Orthe Equestrian Trail Committee hell May 20, 1987. 'lisle all isx ;` In detail 1q,17the conference report of that meetirg eVy encjaga&: . A a :eiieeic iss the amount of $250 to cover the fee for this process.... r If there are any questions, rlarlticaitans, eta., phase, eat its» Phil Lamp or Mr. Larry Toerper or Mr, Julio Castillo at (714) 90- 9$1V•.;fni� is medWe res�e, It is very important that .e maintain our awmiN 1987 Pi' agenda date. asntist�C�Fesiauisn & Very trt3ly a. C PLAN ~ aw...� By CPL:ph - Enclosures 840-K W. 9TH ST.. UPLAND CA 91786 . (714) 946-9919 ,I ic 4 MIL ElIMNEERING LAND SURVEYING LAND PLANNING Mmy"Umd-W 12USM11" DATE OF COMMIEWN 5120/07 TI&M Alodifleatim of dMVWWA IW Equeablan TrWL r*qWro* for appnWal of find map for T',tct 'No. f2WX immm 4s Thgs+ Waadj4j;b Loco _oat. the West side, of llermom& A"nW cuemo"ft. R*w p. ThI& Was a regdar AMMOng of ther Z*wAdex. Tftfi Commstee suppardw Staff how the"" 4ft MMVhy, Project -Hatow, AM*WWmx M. HWI *=W,6j Morac- Developmett CORIP0% the home thilldbri and;,Wxw,& FM Lange and Jim Knutson, C P LxnW Mighmm M%innions The discuoke center*&around."The Woods 11 Equestrian Tlmff Realignment Plan" prepared by 0 Plange ftg&mWs so discussed In Won in our letter dated April Deckled: 7be of the EquWrian TAR Committee Is to preserve this trio. ent sylvan condition. Th* trall committee requires of th creek for the southerly portion of the tract. cross -the creek, hopefully, at its present crossing-!,Wnt the southerly line of Lot 21 An alignment easterly be *quired from that . point north approximately as shown reallopent plam 840-K W. OTH ST. • UPLAND CA 91786 • (714) 946-9919 97.- IT -4 Conference Reports -; City of Rancho Cucamonga a May 22,1987 2 =r Specific Re�c n'rements 1. The trail is to be provided with standard rail fences on both sides 20 feet apart. The fences should "flow "Ibr have a smooth gently curving appearance, no sharp jogs. The trail will meander back and forth I in its present alignment between these two fences. 2. The existing trail is to be left in its present unimproved condition. No trees J are to be removed, and no grading or paving of the trail is to be permitted. 3. There is to be no improvement or easement within the 100 -year overflow zone. The fences will terminate at the overflow area boundary and $dip again on the other, side. The Equestrian Trail easement will terminate at the overflow area boundary. There will be no improvement o &,4hfle creek crossing, no culverts and no bridges. The existing ckcysing will be lei4 `1n its existing condition, and the new crossing at the south will be a similar Lnimpr4dirt crossing. 4. An existing Master Plan Equestrian Trail enters the tract from the south on an alignment east of,,the creek. This trail shall be realigned to cross the creek and join the existing trail west of the creek dpprorimately at the southerl edge of Lot 15 in the near vicinity of the existing y Y g �;`s�ted rip rap. The .crossing shall be a graded dirt crossing similar to the existing crossing at the south edge of Lot 25. is 5. The existing trail alignment t4ringes slightly into the 100 -year overflow zone in the vicinity of Lots 15 and 16. We will attempt to relocate the trail outside this,overflow zone if that can be done without additional tree removal. Additional st. :--nay be required in this one area of concern. 6. The Equestrian Trail Committee shall review the final engineering draw -.ngs for final trail approval purposes. This concludes our conference report. This report was taken from written meeting notes. Corrections, revisions, clarifications are solicited. We wish to thank the Equestrain Trail Committee and the planning staff, especially Mr. Scott Murphy for their help in resolving the many issues that complicated the fianal solution of this trail plan. I believe the community will be especially proud of this trial section. We are happy to play a part in its preservation. firer CF ay C',L:ph ec, Mr.. Flank Stanger, Nordic Development Company 11 cyry or- RANCHO CUCA�IMUNrGA► PLANNING DIVE MN �i. NMI IT��I: 1E?�d� 1{'>lifJJrrfCs�j,{�ihi TrrLE- LXpl T- _ _ _ 4 OG LE- - CITE' QF PL A NNIP, s DrViS'IQN' 55 'i rrF-% MILD ��•�� 6S. �.aresm.�.sa r. RESOLUTION NO. g6 -1 I A RESOLUTION OF. THE PLAMM NG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12902 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12902, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Woodland Pacific, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the Ci,`y of- Aancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino,, State of California, described as 39.7 acres located 'on the west side 0 Hermosa Avenue, south of Almond Avenue into 29 lots, regularly came before the P110nir9 Court SSion for public hearing and action on April 23, 1986; and WHEP AS, the City Planner has recce ended approval of the Map subject , to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; an i Engineering Ea dSPlannngPDivision ` s reportsnl and � has considered cother evidence presented at the public hearing, NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SEC''; ON 1: The Planning Commission makes tree following findings in regard to tentative Tract No.. 12902 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (b) ?�e design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suiL;itole for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial- environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health probl�qs; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at ' -rge, now of record, for access through or Uso or the properly within the proposed subdivision. (9) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. �r RESOLUTION N0, TT 12902 WOODLAND CIFIC April 23, 1966 Page 2 hereto, is2Cereb approved su4 e t to elilaf`lthe 2follow ngfconditionsaandchede attached Standard Conditions: Planning Division: 1. Lots siding on Hermosa Avenue (1, 11, 12, 18, 19, & 24) shall provide minimum 36 feet side yard setback ;rom -curb face. 2. Height, material and type of fencing used along Hermosa Avenue sh7^11 be subject to review and approval of the City Plan t. 3. Tree ._:_ ;al is allowed only for the construction of streets, "'equestrian trails, flood protection and minimal pad preparation per approved Tree' Removal Permit. Additional Tree Removal Permits will be :required at such time that proposed dwellings are suMaitted to the Planning Division for raview and approval; 4. C.C. &Rs shall be PVepared for the project to preserve existing trees, maintenance of trails, and minimize grading. Further, CC&R's shall prohibit solid (view obstructing) walls or fences. The C.C. &Rs shall he prepared, by the applicant and submitted to the City for review and approval prior to approval of the final map. 5. All trails, fences, drainage provisions and site clean -up shall be ac" ,fished in conjunction with street improvement installations. This shall include appropri xturi'zed pavementy treatment where the A En 6. Provide an easement for •co mL -i• trail purp s west of the drdinasce course to the west property boundary as recommended by the Equestrian Advisory Committee. A modified community trail standard will be required subject to the review and approval of the Equestrian Advisory Committee prior to recordation. .:� 1. Main north /south natural drainage channel: A. Minimal grading is allowed within the channel as necessary fcr flood protection for future residences as approved by the City Engineer. __ -1 RESOLUTION 140, TT 12902 - VOODLANL .CIFIC April 23, 3986 Page 3 B. All buildings shall be sat back a minimum of $04 from the edge of the Q100 water surface level, unless erosion preventing measures such as rip rap are provided in seleCtLI locations. A defined building set back vine to this effect shall be placed on the final map. C. An offer of dedication to the City for drainage Purposes for the total area within the building set back lines shall be made on the final map. 0. A final dralhrige study shall be prepared by the developer's engineer for the toter project and approved by the City Engineer prior to rwcordation of the final map. 2. Drainage devices from the cul -e -sac streets to the natural channel sh,01 be provided as approved by the City Engineer. Eatements'for the devices shall be dedicated on th9 final ,rAp. 3. A minimum 201 wide easw&nt for access to Parcel 29 ` sm Court "S", 4. The Almond. Street crossing of the natural channel shall be designed to pass a 6100 under the street, 5. A storm drain system shall be constructed within Almond Street to convey flows from the area to the northeast of the Remainder Parcel to the natural channel gener311y as shown on the conceptual grading plan. 6. The developer shall place underground tha exiting overhead electric lines less than 66 KV and the telecommunication tines on the opposite side of Hermosa Avenue fer the entire length of the subject tract upon ccostruction of the streets for Tract 1,2902, 7. prior to recording, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under the Alta Loma Channel Assessment District among the newly created parcels. f E-11 RESOLUTION N0. TT 12902 WOODLAND ZIFIC April 23, 1985 ; Page 4 BUILDING DIVISIOM: I. All required drainage easements, per review and approval Of Building Official, shall be shown on final map. 2. Prior to recordation of final map, the applicant shall: a. Remove the reservolf,; or, b. Provide proof` %positive that no other party has claim to the use of the reservoir and bond for its removal. :he reservoir shall be removed at the time of street construction operations. Under both conditions, service lines that are determined to have a detrimental effect on lot * or adjacent lots shall be removed. tot 4'shall be returned to structural. adequacy under I, corrtirruous inspection of a qualified soils{, engineer. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 233RD DAY OF APRIL, 1986. P COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: enni ou , a ee --- ATTEST: ra u er, epu y ecre ary I. Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution of was duly -regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of April, 1986, by the following vote -to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, REMPEL, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER E j� _ . ; RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE 4AN�,Ci CUCtiNONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MODIFYING CONDITIr 0d NO'. 6 UND Lj PLANNING D „. Y ISION OF PLANNING COWISF2N RESOLUTION 90. 86 -41 FOR TENTATIVE € TRACT LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER;,9r HERMOSA AVENUE AND ALMOND STREET (APN 201- 071 -05, 06, 2E, 26,-35 AND 36) ., WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of May, 1987, a modification was filed 6y ! Nordic Development, for review of the above- described project, and WHEREAS, on the 10th day: of June, 1987 the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission ht,ld a public hearing to consider the above- described project. follows: NOW. THE the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as r, PION 1. That Condition No. 6 under Planning Division of Resolutioi: J54T—sWall be modified to read as follows: 6. Provide an easement for, Community Trail purposes Qast of the drainage course from the southerly tract Soundary north to the general area ..... of lot 7. i Provide an easement for Community Traii purposes west of the drainage course from the general area of Lot 16 north to the general area,of�Lot 25. Provide an easement for Community Trail purposes east of the drainage course from the general area of Lot 25 north to the northerly tract boundary. The final alignment and proposed improvements to the trail and .drainage course shall be revie►6d and approved by the Trails Advisory Committed prior to recordation, of the final map. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS LOTH DAY OF JUNE, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: arry c e , airman ATTEST: ra u I er, ULIPUTY ecre ary PLANVI G COMMiSS ON RESOLUTION NO. TRACT 11902 - NORDIC June 10, 1987 Page Z #� ' I Brad Buller, Deputy Secretzj.�y of the Pl a,nninO 'Commission of the City of q�ncno Cucamonga, do hereby certify.-that the foregoing Resolution Zti duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the' Planning Commission of the City cf Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meetiRg of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of 4,une, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: r. AYES: COMMISSIONERS. ` NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: CCMISSIONERS; a r1 R , AML f A RATE: TO: FROM: BY: - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAmoNGA �roA STAFF REPORT a, f June 10, 1987 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civii Engineer Joe Stofa, Jr., Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MP 10444 - BARTON DEVELOPMENT * A su IV -ision of acres -of-Ta—nd -of-, a-n into 3 parce s in t e In ustrial Park (Subarea 7), located in the Southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Spruce Avenue - APN 208 - 351.25 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of the r- rapased Tentative Parcel Map as inown on it- uQu B. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 - 2.25 Acres' Parcel 2 - 3.02 Acres Parcel 3 - 7.40 Acres C. Existing_ Zoning: Industr al:Park (Subarea 7) D. Surrouns *-Land Use• North - pant y South Office Park East - Vacant West - Office /Professional Building E. surrounding General Plar+ and Development Code Designations• North Terra Vista Punned Communixy South - Industrial Park, Subarea 7 East - Industrial Park, Subarea 7 West - Haven Avenue Overlay District F. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant, with the exception of a structure on parcel!, 1, and slopes approximately 2% to the south. ITEM F '��� l v M (E 64t-4- 11011 e ap x. t ) Site Plan DR 86 -05 (Exhibit "C") Master Plan Overlay OR 86 -05 (Exhibit "D ") Resolution and Recommended Conditions of Approval 'PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPbRT y y TENT. PARCEL MAP 10444 JUNE 10, 1983' PAGE 7 II. ANALYSIS The purpose of this parcel map is to create 3- separate parcels for E financing purposes. The site plan of a recently constructed restaurant (Harry C's) on Parcel , ,. 1 is shown on Exhibit "C" Parcels 2 and 3 are current;: vacant with no development plans submitted at this time. A copy of the area Master Plan submitted for Harry attached as exhibit "D ". The missing street improvements adjacent to Parcels 2 and 3 will be• completed at time of development.. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The applicant completed Part I of the Initial to y. a con toted a field investigation and completed Part II of the Initial Study. No adverse impacts upon the enmi, -Ment are anticipated as a result of this prn+ —t. Therefore, issuane if Negative ~ ~- Declaration is appropriate, IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at-,the site has also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input and elements of the Tentative Parcel Map... If after such ? consideration, the Commission can recommend approval, then the adoption J J of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate.. f`. Respectfully submitted, r Barrye — Hanson Senior Civil Engineer BRH:JS:dlw Attachments: Vicinity Map (Exhibit "A") j j T."4- .+ ' l e ap x. t ) Site Plan DR 86 -05 (Exhibit "C") Master Plan Overlay OR 86 -05 (Exhibit "D ") Resolution and Recommended Conditions of Approval 2� 'Ell 3 z a u I, - nak • r F-5 �zl L it I z tL t� Q i +a r 3 z a u I, - nak • r F-5 �zl L it I z oz Q W I- A 60, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 10444 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. COUNTY OF SAN BERNAROINO, STATE OF CALIFOANIA. *e'" A ol"*to" CW PA^CCL B CW P—C96 "A* 40. *742 AD p4n "p macco"D zm 90DK 67 OP wAftccL Haps. PAG90 4 T"NOUGN 7. Z*Ct-lJ4XVC. NgCoftqlk ap oAjo toL)MTV Av4.ua 41 441- ..444 t CuRVE CATX A 21 A momumEw. uom X v. liA-ls a�c 4 na- 41 0 ol tz k a aws I- A 60, �z # s _ e —;- ��— •_ • _... � . it - ' -,.. _..__ N. �e i cs ri P— 9 1' f! t ;�... to * Wit!. .��: 1 • £! tP�?,X t a • 1 e i�• .t �r� F Y) 9t' ' a�•O ,t 5b Y ""°.= a �• °�" rte �rQO��� ,s , 4, , �. DMA ` }aK ' r ,; of � ®' • > Y'3 `C^ • -- } : ' Rda v i] rte. �t � x ;' �vi►,. 70 db Tom. di►ai _ �a s., r 11 RESOLUTION NO. t' RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ftANCHR 4bCAMONGA, ? CALIF TA, —SOWAITIONALLY APPROVING ENTA f IVt PARCEL MAP h t+ Ef i 04 WHEREAS, T; ative Parcel Map Number 10444, submititec(' Barton Development, apply alt, for the purpose of subdividing into 3 pa -eels, the real property sitIated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, ,County of San Bernardino, State of California, identified as APu(s) 208 f43 located in the Southwest corner of Foothill Boulevlyd anti Spruce Avenue; and WHEREAS, an June 14, 2,`8337, the Planning Commission held a: duly advertised public hearing for the above - described map. NOW, THEREF09C THE PANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISS103 RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS , SECTION 1; Tt�at the following findings have teen made: 1. That t!.teilap is consistent with the General Plan. 2, That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development.,, - . 4 That the ra ed bd' I" pos su tvrs an and improvements wiII not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 10444 is hereby approved subject to t e attached .Standard Conditions and the following Special Conditions: Special Conditions 1. Notice of intention t;+ form and /or join the lighting and landscaping district shall be filed with the City Council prior to recorda,lon of the map or issuance of building permit, whir,)ever occurs first. F -7 R ' ^- A °PROVED AND ADOPTED T131S lCa DAY JUNE, '987� ,OF .,. PLAIrFING- 0.0MMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman 1f a�i ATTESTS Brad Eulier, BeputY Sac'retary L I, Brad Bully, Dep .tj* S- 3cretary of .the Planning Commission of the City of RancLo Luca ga, do hereby ceutify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and u regularly i- atroduced, passed, and adapted by the Plannind 60mmissiou of the `. City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular'me�ting of Planning Commission held `the on the 1Gth day of ,Tune, 1987, by the following vr'& -to -wit:; �r. AYES., COWISSIDNERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS; ABSENT: COMMI5SIO t,> j y, ya 1 Y R Amh a IC LI C .'o 4 M r P Y t O Y Mai V� !3L '�� "p YU Vr NY wV•~ a0 i i IF iw. y �8m -,~u vi ny yn bxa, Ytl 6pq, a $y �yN T A4p+M +iVpipf� ,I N 2. Try �`JJ.'P. � tl f�L � �tVgq L� nya i !11 L p Ye _C YV.Y �p yL� YI V Oa a CZ p': p M � 9 MY LY. L b YYyy cc C ♦♦ V•V {t ' Mf w• L lei t cZ Ij r 6 no .i D G VN �M QAiA iAL WLl ` YwdiO <V M ti 7j, V �C apv — VEY w CCCJa r J p ., - '.. `p. a ".. � : �. tY,. •. c ay z. if $ Y. e � L OOYP �_w yy W G A4 L Y PZ F �� 4Y �` R• ��e � �iY a'l • Yp^ N C1Y w' QU r 4 pY y y} A L � Cy T� M?+4jx 4 Y V A 9 p CY .R CC Y� M L PC '•S� � u � ar q. •�. gam. �� �� �. � as 'va A! E9 •�� !� .a.'. .ate °g oy.$ >� V �j D9A pY Oy t�l 4u aR 6 i �� w pppCp +C LOL. LYw —eta L 6 Yp, C vCp 9L.1► !X �� "�'V r`� ■ r 4. g. Yi.� y O •yJ'L � +6, tL ®p =40 6 =LO. Y I, i ,DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: /i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA c,�CAo STAFF REPORT o �p� I— 'z U 5: June 10, 1987 19777 Chairman and Members of tine Planning C mmission Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer Joe Stofa Jr., Associate Civil Engineek ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL; MAP 10295 - LEWIS HO ,r, A `sub iV7szono acres. Tana nto parse s in tha Term Vista Planned Community, located on,- Elm Avenue, west of Milliken Aenue - APN 1077 - 421 -16, 13 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Re uestrd: Approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map as S�IOWiI Olt uBn B. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 - 0.70 Acres ?arcel 2 4.96 Acres Parcel 3 - 1.15 Acres Parcel 4 8.67 Acres C. Existing Zonings Terra Vista Planned Community D. Surrounding Land Use: North - Residential South - Vacant East - Vacant West - Vacant E. Surrounding Ceneral Plan and Development Code Designations: North - Residential, Medium South - Residential, Medium High East - Residential, Medium High West - Residential, Low- Medium F. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant and slopes approximately 2% to the south. ITEM G PLANNING COMMISSION STAF5 REPORT TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 10295 JUNE 10, 1987 FAGS 2 II. ANALYSIS: The purpose e.z this parcel map is to crea,e four separate parce'rs. Parcels 1 and 3 are for portions of the foot and bicyclegreerkay.( Parcel 2 will be a park. Parcel 3 is for a future elementary shoal. arcels 1, 2, and 3 are scheduled to to developed this summer. There are R no definite plans for the school site. The offsite street improvements will he constructed upon development of Parcel 4 as shown on Exhibit "C ". III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Th4_ applicant completed Part I- of the Initial to y. Staff conducted a field investigation and completed Part II of . the Initial Study. No adverse impacts upon the :4onment are anticipated as a result of this project. "herefore, issv,,_Ece of Negative Declaration is appropriate. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrourding property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been; completed. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that thAll Manning ,Commission consider a i�f nnut and elements of the Tentative .Parcel VAp, If after such MW considt.ration, the Commission can recommena approval, then the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, AW,1wWIhk4440V Barrye R. Hanson Senior Civil Engineer , BRH:JS:dlw Attachments: Vicinity Map (Exhibit "A") Tentative Map (Exhibit 11811) Location & Street Improvement Requirements (Exhibit "'C ") Resolution and Recommended Conditions of Approval LA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGG ID-ION 1 { i :a o PARCELS T E N T A T I V E 5t£Er I OF y %EET5 1f Ilfr ACRES PARCEL. MAP NO. 1029 APRIL. ,�,� IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA KKvI da•ea a Y d n•t, K. txea. I40a1:' nO t,�1,te1tT. Ile:. a woewssc•rsa. to - t K a seal eewwatr NiY1T Tx •ua m9ao t ar �• YK ailw v 4 tT .K it•rt! K,d1®�4 tEYR'_ NM tl� li 611 IY tIM6r y � t O�iwNM�K r4+41•n b3W,a.9Y !r Yilrlmd.4 M! /W atOiY IM liter is `+ . �rlt •fN•ya O�41i •^a K•laa rR V { u g Zp�s -5 r a va + t tOC /17 p r ft R M+`• �$$ h 9 t2G0,2p Jm�' � '� 6 .� _ 16 1 t t > • �xaa lit a +« Env. - rer:r�r. „fir ie strca. NO? Nz o .V� p moo i 1 retlw°a ri�t:Aewi.aa eat. dl•..w•` I _ _ � T a4attrt PARCEL Z r,}� PAR6:i 3 it ~�' 6a m ter.+ s� � e4• fit. {tiro K. NET tI 1111 _.. . f „4.NfY tt•"•w 4. 'f `47 Ka« l It 1 ( - ev U 4ftTAAMjr ! eh911 lEl.•016f.: TMOEM7 8 ty� n • . ^y `` t.. : ae•w n.•�xo.oc��aeou' us.sz• 06•Sf Ge• At).GQ 19.CC a2.•8, ,,• 72•QC 9s' 6M.t16 2mw.19 r57. Kr ''.. P1lICFy a1 i h^ _ p Mtl• »• ]904,N 2T.96lY cta• »•. 2f.e.m 27.7a •lw _i Wtl. Ac AKY a� __ �• �� 0.26' »• 7090.90 2a.ar2:0+ �r � ��tN ^- 0�lR.lt• � �.l.tV 'il.rG' 74eC •L., - 'vw�mm la ot.w a�rxvawlr JJ y.,, r o tdr 1 .0•.e _ '\� i ¢ YS _ «�� mtxne61•rz9. lc. R h�+ h � • gl,l•u !•nat utlL�rr.ua A� ri � ReC� � mHH P 11 ,QAp \i w�wzfs 7 Arn•+!u ni .•i snic mss. '.rem,• mlr. nr„ .u.e mRrm. —!j ntii4m man f. mlrt4ra llM +er1Y. Mta TTa! M' +Oa'. a r w •C!a rM41R rw • •ern m.r. wa.a a era ✓,,Y' et v Yee«. � t4 cy e1 TERRA VISTA PLANNED OMWITY PROJECT N0. Ih295 PROJECT AND STREET STA uS Preliminary Completeness TRC N PC Recorded scauino , Finaled a ra ?. P LM LM UN E IU EM .✓� "fp � Ott LIA L._.._ ..._�. I �A L06 LU Il "c7r 4 9Q f , '► • me WIN a LU ap cc MAC C OP h �! I _ _ �� • iilmC II LEGEND: r PROJECT STATUS = In Process iM P C Approved ® Recorded iM Finaled STREET STATUS N + Tx— t ng Pavement M IN Required for this Project 1. MILLI KEN A\1E. - r-ULL \41OTH P AS2CEL MAP 10295 LOCATION s STREET ?--ELM AVE.- FULL'> MTH TME: anvErn�►„ RFn�t�+tFi�lE 3. CVAURLH ST. -- FuLI. \,q 1 QT 14 ., 1, RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMORCA CALIFORNIA,. CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL �; v NUMBER 10295 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 10295, submitted by Lewis Homes, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 4 parcels,- the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, identified as APN(s) 1077- 42116, 13, located or4 Elm Avenue, west of Milliken Avenue; and , WHEREAS, on June 10, 1987, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing fer the above - described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNIAG COMMISSION RESOLV(,:O AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1z. That the fol ?,"wing findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is j consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvcoents will not cause substantial environmental daffiage,`public _ health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 10295 is hereby approved subject t0 t e attached Standard Conditions and the following Special Conditions: SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1. Elm Avenue shall be constructed full width` include curb on the opposite side from Spruce Avenue to the southern boundary of Parcel t with the first phase of development. 2. The following streets shall be constructed full width for the stated limits except that offstte sidewalks and parkway landscaping may be deferred until development of the adjacent property upon development of Par.al! 4. 't e '77,171 RESCi PAGE'',;, 4$ a.. Miili4eyn Avenue from Base line Roo. to Foothill Bo:ulevcvd including landscaped median; b,, Elm Avenue from Spruce Avenue to Church Street= and t _ c. Church" Street f °1!! Elm Avenue to Milliken Avenue. 3. Additional dedi,catidhs may be required for the greerhhay i near Milliken Avenue. - A final "determination will be made based upon the finial .fiesign for the pedestrian undercrossing and Approaching trails. APPROVED ANJ ADOPBE94HIS 10TH DAY OF JLK �98T. 'CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA f BY: Larry T. Mal , C ai rman _ ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy ecretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning vommissica of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby cer-tii:y that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced; passed, and adopted by ti:e Planning Commission of the := City a Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the;',Planning Commission held on the 10th day of Jane, -'9$7, by the following vote -tb -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: L • r 11 it F a a a c Y. Y$ M +i ! l gu �r pp i Y H T& av Xr' �` $...� a � '•Qp a+s a �t i e i gv'� r42, a� bra gs ism if ZSC hi NN fSi d�V •b`i� " 3 d ff i� s � Li s Iry •) • Is • .. �.! ge • k. ��` •L$ 5�1� + a YvvCCO ZZN 6# •.� � y 4j` WY ; t ff i� s � MY s • n a�i.i ge • k. ��` •L$ 5�1� YwC 4j` WY ; KCw V i v k Cp• w Y �f on � y A`°' 46� end U S `r -A �r A �tN YrY to pa 9rd. ! ♦ r p ��r c ~�1 ..� g2Y w r Yh r fY p� A 1Y �i : - to S u "ai V N a uS Ril' WHO < R O b A 1 L 4Q Ay g Y L a °_. to ..� _tz E y r Yh r fY p� A 1Y �i - A, u "ai •�v a uS Ril' WHO < R O V 4` v Lrn o� u on ..� � �.� o ♦� � �b� 444 � s q +v w S i P I aC I -9 IF »S g L • too, tL to ..� _tz E y r Yh r fY p� A 1Y - A, u "ai •�v a uS .L WHO < R O o+°. ' X Z 9 N A 1 a r -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT 4g�� z 197 DATE: lane 10, 1987 TD Chainimn and members of the Planning Co- mission F110ty1t Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Howard Fields, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMFNTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13475 WILLIE -FRUPEiiTi'- - residenVal sup ,lv'�' ision n s ij s on acres o land in the Low Rey :dential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) locate`, on the northeast corner of Hellman Avenue and Tryon Stt"det (In addition, the applicant has fl-led a Tree Removal Permit) - APR; 208 - 111 -04. 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a tentative tract map and t 'issuance —of a negative declaration. B. Project Density: 3.9 dwelling units per acre j C. Surrounding Land Use and Zonings North - Existing Ingle famf y residences, Low Residc:►tial (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) South - Existing single family residences, Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) East - E;sting Single family residences, Low Residential t1 -54 dwelling units per- acre) West - Existing single family residences, Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) i D. General Plln Designaxic°�: rolec i',te = coating park designati;•p North - Low Residential (2 -4 dwei.tng'•qnits per acre) South - Low R ^sidential (2.4 dwelling chits per acre) East - Low Rasidmtial (2 -4 dwelling wits per acre) West - Low Residefiti,.? JZ-4 dwelling units per acre) ITEM x { PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 13476 - WILLIAMS PROPERTY CONSULTANTS Jurre 10, 1957 Page 2 t E. Site Characteristics: The subject site is an in -fill residential d'eveT t representing the last large vacant parcel of land along Heilmar: Avenue between Church street and Foothill Bouletard. The site has an existing elder home, garage, and.two barns, and generally slopes from north to south at-- a;pproxima'. y a 31/ grade. 'vibere are scattered, unmaintained citrus trees scheduled for rimoval. The project site is trau:versed by the inferred R' ;,d Hill Fauit Special Study Zone rn a outhwest to northeasterly direction. A geological investigaton for Tent - -tive Traot 13476 was required to uerify Substantial com ;-111 nce and conformance to she guidelines se• forth in Alquist -N iolo special study zone act. Thir de;eiopment is also within a Flood Zone A, requiring a hydrology study to determine the flood plane level along Hellman Avenue, as well as determining appropriate flooding mitigation meast;res. II. BAU4GROUND:' the City's General P%n lan$ t-5e map shows the subject si a as a future park site.. In Apr,_. 198f, the City Council terminated the nagoti;tions for* arquisitiorm of the subject: parcel for r..rk purposes. The City Council elected not to exercise its "option to purchase" the property. The 'Council's ,etions were based primarily on the fact of a newlf�approved Red Hill community park site located across from Alta-Loma High Sthool, which will be dedicated in Melly 1987. 1I1. ANALYSIS: A. General: The,praposed in-fill subdi,%s-�rr features an internal ooT p - s-fr¢et tonfiguration and larger corner lnts at the project entry. The lot sizes range from 7,200 , ;quare feet to 13,584 square feet with ill lets in the subdivis0rt taking access off of Tryon Str" t, since Hellman Avenue is subject to periodic flooding. Lets 1 -7 will be front -ore situations along Tryon Street rich is in keeping :,ith the character of the neightjrhood and existing front -on situations on the south side of Tryon Street, The proposed subdivision will be enclosed on three sides with a 6-foot high masonry wall along W loran Avenae, north tract boundary, and east tract bauetd y = ra�iiii;.3 ono common barrier. All existing strcctures are slated for demolition and removal. B. Design Review Comoc' ; tee: The Committee ( C,imerick, Tolstoy, tier! recommended approval subject to the following: o Construction or a common masonry wail along ".'te project's eastern perimeter. N f 7_ PLANNIVC COMMISSION STAFF REPOT l' TT 13476 - WILLIAMS PROPERTY CONSULTANTS AOL June 10, 198 Page 3 { o `Concrete insets shall be provided for planter cut-outs-for I: street trees along Hellman Avenue. o Provide a decorative masonry wall (i.e., pilaste') along {, Hellman Avenue. This wall should be staggered, to: increase `l h- visual interest.' I, The Committee directed staff to work with the applicant 'on a low maintenance drougirt tclerant landscaping design adjL,;ent to the masonry wall along Hellman Avenue. Any slopes An the '! parkway - are to be a maximum of 3:1. The applicant concurred with all staff comments and revised their plans accord ngiy. C. Te.hnical Review Committee: The Committee recomme -nded approval; subje -- to Existing overhead utilities '1telecommunications and electrical) on the projeCtL side of Hellman Avenue ° be undergrounded from. the first pole on the south side of Tryon Street to the first pole off -site nortt of the north project boundary prior tt) public improvement and acceptar::e or occupancy whichever ozr.urs ,first. However, it st:3uTd be noted that reimbursement of one -half of the City adopted costs for undergrourding tram future development as it occurs on the opposite side of the street is not feasibi, because the property is presently developed. During 'she Committee Reviews, the issue of requirements ?or flood prote,.tion were discusses" with the developer. The developer is rer-jesting e.n alternate flood protection metho to 4e one recomw -rided by staff for the area along Hellman Avenue, . Hellman Avenue is sub,ect to large quantities of storm water run off during heavy rainfall. The area along Hellman is designated as a flood hazard area ('one 4) by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). City Ordinance WO', which was adopted to be in compliance with FEMA regulation,, states that the lowest - habitable floors of the residential structures shall be elevated above the Q100 flood water level, referring to 100 year flood. Therefore, staff has recommended that `.he pads adjacent to Hellman Avenue be so elevated Based upon, the drainage study provided by the developer's engineer, the pads are required to be elevated about 3 feat above Heilman Avenue. E evating the pad. adjacent to H-1 man Avenue causes an excessive height differential between tt,e pads and the curb for the internal Street 118'r, therefore, the Grading Committee recommended that Street 119 ?1 be raised so that a maximuti height PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ? " TT 13476 - WILLIAMS P30PERTY CONSULTANTS 'June 10 1947 I Page 4 WI differendd of 5 feet was obtained. The developer is c:nteerned with these two requirements due to the additional �. expanse of importing dirt.' The developer is requestir.7 that he be allowed to consiruct the r° pads along Hellman Avenue to a height at or below that of the top of curb and protect the site with a flood protection wa't't, contrary to Ordinance #240. Staff feels that the delelopers request is unacceptable for the following reasons.: t. a It is in Violation of City Qrdinance #243 and FEMA regular ons. s` o A wall is susceptible to tampering by unsuspected homeowners. o A wall is susceptible to damage from floating c)ebris. ! It ' Ited that if the site is protected as recommended by `,aff r 4 sty would support the developer if he were to request t 1� xhat the site be removed from Flood Zone A designation, w'rrrch would eliminate the requires ,ant for the future homeowners �M to acquire flood protection. E D. Environmental Asses smeat: Part I of the Initial Study has been comp eted by 755 cactt, aaP_F Staff has conducted a field investigation and has com;leted Part II of the Environmental Checklist and has determine! that the development of the ti subject site would expose people and property to water related. hazard such as flooding. However, this has been mitigated through a 3 foot elevation of the proposed pads above the Boa` . of curb along the Hellman Avenue frontage (see Exhibit ''D" Cross- Se.tion C -C) Th;. final hydrology and drainager report will be required and Identify all apprv7riate off -site dra„ nagki facilities necessary to mitigate flood related hazards. According to the City's Master Pl,,,n drainage system, Hellman Avcnue will carry a significant amount 0 s1rface run -off from upstrea,.r properties. The subvert site is transversed by the inferred Rey! hill, Fault Zone running from sjutr.westerly to northeasterly .direcxion (Exhibit "G"). A geological investigati.,)n for tentative Tract 1.3476 war required for the purposes of a geological investigation to determine the preseaca of the Red Hill Fault as indicated in the Seismic Safety Element for the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Generai Flan (Exhfg t "F "). As the result WI k� 7 71 FLA ►,NINE COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT'13476 - WILLIA14S PROPERaY CQk3ULTANTS ) ' Page 5 ff rr11 -uf this study, the geologic consultant stated that -the Red +iii;, Fault does n:. exist as a near surface feature'at this trac and no, surface' disruption dun to faulting is expected. Therefore, arty restrictions on construction based on surface rtipture due, to on -site faulting are unw rranted -at this sitwe. However, it should be noted that the site `floes lie in an area c jcernsd to be active. Str6` shaking from e'arthquak `s on any one of Vie k6 own faults,In the regiota should brant pipated.,, As appropriat mitigatfon the consultant ii requ •ing that structures ..b;� built ar.,cording to all seismic, rage rtments, of the Uniform Building" Code and the City .q1 93&,Ri Cucamonga Department of Building and Safety. The conVi', nt concludes that the side "appears ve fappears suirabla for deoment from an engineering geological standpoint.. E. Tree R�va i•" The applicant fil €``-,--r --ee arborist reptirt and a free remava �permf� (see attached, 'which discusses aspects of tires t. ?f� . and /or rei,:ovai of einht (8) trees. Tree aftorist rr ommends ;Ml trees with 'the ee option of the large E�apnol is tree );3cated a!� Lot 13 be removed -`due to weakened condition land poor %:overall 1;ilth. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINnZ'- The .site design together with the re;q* ended con ons are "tn comoltance with the applicable - rovition .of the Development Code, �denerai Plan, and City" Srandprds and Regulatipps. 'rhe project will not be detriment /t1 to adjacent properties or cause significant aC�rse impactsll�,dua to flood improvements which` will be provided tr,,:dispose of sir r'�ce run -cff and t`te h, h t r,,i i i tg es _ sus c requirements of the Uniform Building Coda am City of Ranchr, Cucamonga Department of Building and Safety V. V` RESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in the Daily 'Report `newsisaper as .a public hearing. Notices were tent *o a property owners within 300 feet of the, site advertising the public hearing. To date no correspondence has bean received for or against this project. VI. RECOMENDATIONt Staff recommends that the Planning CQwfssi:on approve en , ve Tract 13476 through the adoption of the attached Resolution and Conditions and Issuance of a Negative neclar;tion. s PL, `MING nOMWiIS I STAFF REPORT TT 13476 - WILLI�O S:PROPERTY- CONSULTANTS , t .}y June 10, 1987 Page 6 ` a Respectfully subm4l i tU4, Bran Bull r City Planner BH :HF•vc Attachments: Tree Arborist Report ' Exhibit "A" - Location Map; Exhibit 'B" -" Site Utilization Map i Exhibit "C" -Tentative Tact Map Exhibit_ "O" ;<Gradi,. P1 an Exhibit "E; - IevelopeQ) Propos ;ail idr Grading Concept Exhibit F Cikl of Ra zho Cucamonga General Plan Geotechnical Hazard°, Exhibit "G" » Inferred Red Hill Fait `' >'2one, Initial Study Part IT Resolution of Approval with Conditions i F_ u. l � �� 3 t R S richard p. January 26, 987 Johnson Marilyn Hove WEST V$NTM "DEVELOPMENT CO. 5960 Sepulveda Blvd. #104 Van NUys, CA 91411 horhicultural cansuitcnts Pro ject'�r 1177 SUBJECT; Site -valuation of Treeq Located at Tract 13476. Ranch Coco Ana' a CA._ - Dear Marilyn.. Per your request we contacted Ruth weber at 7851,Hellman, Rancho Cucamoniga, gained entry to property, and inspected and evaluated all trees orsite. The following is result of that inspection, conducted 26 JAII $7. Site trees include: apricot, orange, apple, persimmon, almond,,4vo %:Ado, fig, loquat, oak, redwood, cypress, magnolia, several small fleas than 3.5' in height) fan palms, rand two clumps of bamboo. Citrus trees were originall_ .Aanted-in-19.12 and are well pass their prime. This is true for majority of site Plantings.. With ossible e..eeytIon of large magnolia specimen lc ed at iio�mtas Hess entrant of existing one-story, wo house, all site clantings —are r .^, ..... ed fox removal arior to sites grading. Larger sPec3mens ons�te have been In Larger tagged with R red Plastic ties to indicate removal, There are approximately 102 orange trees, 8 avocado, 4 apricot, 6 apple, 2 persimmon, 1 almond, 1 fig, 2 locust, 3 redwood, 1 cypress, 4 small fare palms, and two bamboa� clumps recommended for removal. There are also two large holly bushes, and various asundry rather smaller shruts and plants that should be removed. Not all of the Specimens Slated fox 1435 glenneyre street # l una beach, Ca P.o. b0x _127 4 laauna o t- elh r%n oe)Ar.0 e74 A\\ An'7 re.ommended removal have been tagged individually; cursory walk- through, prior to indepth sPecinen eva -ti tion, :immediately indicated that all but the one specimen magnolia are too weakened to remKin. Large redwood specimen, located next to magnolia at entrance to One,atory, wooden structure, shows evidence of a weakened top crown and acute stress. Overall vigor is Qar. Two smaller redwoods in this same location are stunted and will never attain their proper P ogortion and fam, . Cypress tree, next to souse, is deed; shows no viable signs of new growth. The oak ,tree sapeci,imen, located on the Tryon street side of the property, is double- trunked and weakened at forked Junction. It, too, should be removed. Overall the specimens o+a this site show evidence of limb /branch breakage; some of it quite recent., ar which makes them particularly suscep Trees are highly stressed Tre es s ar disease. THF ARE Wn HEM-?M%__ SPHCIWMS ON THIS SITE_, THEE i OF HISTOIiICAE, SYGNI LF C�AIa."E A31 show sign: of extreme neglect and many, as atated Previously, are well past : their prime. The ne Possible exception is the 'urge Kagriolia and the following protection guidelinaa apply to it only• It should be naffed that this magnolia also Chows evidence -nf threes and limb breakage, that NO hcrticulth.ral c9aurance can b- made *_'.1s tree will not, at it renains onsite, building some point in tithe, prove a liability grobietr. due to falling branches. If structures shPule3 :sot be located within its' dripline, nor should t-ny of its' branches be allowed to overhang or abut planned stf''Qttures os othar types of personal woperty. The key to the maintenance of the magnolie- 4 -s-te. keep it preened to prot0t it from wind dama7e. If it is to r0main onsite it Will need to be deep fed with nitrogen and iron before the spring "flush ofagrc• -to located has arts. octhill region where this tree is notorious Santana wind condition and all thinning of growth must be accomplished before the 3antnna's strike. All dead woad should be removed. Present Status of m�3stolia si�eCimen Based upon general site inspection, this tree is in fair -ta -good condition; it has y heavy amount of deadwood but overall is in relatively good health. T';ere is no evidence of fungal disease. There are a few insect peat present but nothing significant and I would not expect them to be troublesome. The diseases evident appear mainly to be folia- in nature and should not be of major consequence. There is evidence of sooty mold (honeydew secretions) which gives the tree 4 M03By appearance, but causes no real harm to the tree. There are likely other disease problems within the tree but hay cursory investigation did not 0 reveal any of them. As these pathogens are encountered I would suggest they b�% identified and treated as needed. ; do not, however, ree any likelihood of any major disease outbreak within this tree. With proper: pruning and care this specimen could become a worthwile tree. PRE- CONSTRUCTI()1€ PHASE site Tree Removal It will be important that care be exa��I *ed during removal of the understary fan palms (and adjascent redwood to ensure that the preserved tree is not damaged either in its upper structure or its roots. Tree removal that is scheemled to take place with 25 feet of subject tree's dripline should require that tree stumps be ground out, rather than pulled, an that no damage; occurs to the magrolia's root system. Should some damage occur it should be evaluated and rem dial activity effected immediately. A delay in this area -.an csuse further unnecessary dieback of g %x d plant tissue. In this event, a tree pruner should be onhand to take care of these items as need ble during this removal phase. Ptunina Pr.ning will mainly consist of the removal of deadwood aad stubs. Accepted standards of flush cutting; k`lrop crotching, and �.ree wound sealing should ie implemnted. Rest time to prurn is right after flowering, and best way fs to remove entire twig or limb right to the base. Tree spikes must not be used &a this can create wounds for disease entry wr insects. A well trimmed tree will never look stubbed back or lopped off. Enhance instead the tree's natural growth habits. Cut back to sound, healthy .,,,mod so that prunin% wounds will heal over quickly and evenly. It is not always pract tal to remove small, dead twigs, but every attempt should be made to remove as many as possible and all of the larger dead-branches. when brancaen become so crowded that light and air cannot reach the main part of the-tree, At is advisable to th R-out enough to-keep the remainder of the tree in good - health. *-'Excessive thinning or. heading back, however, ca-1 reduce the leaf su- fad,%. to such an a�t ent trot the tree or branch cannot continue to manut�Z-re- sufiiclent foods fos its needs. Such excessiveness mutt be avoided. Fertilization Fertilization is bet,-- Performed prior to any construction activity. Prc _rly invigorated, this tree will boa eile to better resist any impacts imposed upon it by construction. Deed feed with nitrogen and iron prior to construction activity and .before the spring "Bush of growth". Apply organic fertilizer by soil granular applicLtion. Can be mixed with ssiid for ease in application. Formula consists of adding tree height in teat, plus crown spread in feet, plus the circumference of the trunk l foot above the ground in inches. F r. t �G EXAMPLE: Tree 401 high, plus 30, in crown spread, plus 30" in trunk diameter will need 100 lbs, of fertilizer. For a tree this size it is best to aptly ir. holes spaced 2 feet apart. Make Stoles in concentric circles around the tree as far as the spread of the branches. If any fertilize remains after the holes have been filled, scatter it over soil surface around the tree and sprinkle immediately to diffuse the soluble Part of the fertilizer and make it readily available to the feeding roots. Good drainage, rather than rich soil, is the its cultivation. However, for best reslts itriserecommended about eve for u that some fertilizes be for to the base, under the dri,pl_ine, r= two or three years after this initial applicaticn. Insect /Diseaiie Control Tree should 1; mon toned for evidence of insect activity. Damaging creatures and diseases are few. wLtch for scale and aphids at any time and for spider mites in hot weat':ter. magnolias are not immune to oak vt f,,,,, (t weat%er. D but they sa`-.m somewhat resistant. Mora bothersome are deficiency probloms: chlorosis from lack of will medya the efirst scondit on, fertilizerr4il fix the helates n terina_ Provide regular, frequent, deeu, haj.wy waterings leach out salts and carry them to which will help 40wer soil ',evels , if drainage is good. Burning of loaf edgeo usually means salt damage from either overfertilizing„ mirteral €alts in the soil, or salts in the irrigation water. All magnolias are excellent trees- to gro„r irl_lawns. These above items would be best performe44.c:or to any major_ cOnstZ4rtion or grading so thrt the tree 1 i—t lts vigorous hest Prior to the impact that develo nt may have on it. iTCTIpId r�thr It is extremely important that all-parties involved witkt the development of this project become ACIUainted with the material contained in this sectica as trey, collectival; end individually, dill have the greatest impact oat the tree. Seser4l types of impact may occur during construction activity, trus•ommonly these are grading cuts and fills, •�•renching for t ral and various utility lines, soil coopaction, physical structural "mage and many otherm. The most severe of these a e usually those which occur to the treei root system, a {.they physical matting or death dud to lack of mail oxygen from compaction or potr drainage, or both. Every attempt should be made tc alleviate these orobiama [Ai F Design Factors Avoid any construction (roads, walks, buildings, etc.) within the dripline of the tree. Established trees show the highest sensitivity to disease and construction damage. The area within the foliage dripline must be handled with particular care. 'he addition of fill soils against the trunk, or che covering and compaction of soil with pavement within the dripline,-prevents normal wetting, dryine°:.and b:sathing of soils from occurring. Lowering the soil level around established trees will often reveal and destrolT criticai lateral and feeder roots which are necessary for healthy survival. Subject tree must be protected at all times from diMpaction and mechanical injury. Excellent drainage must be a component in any design plan. Generally, maximum encroachment should be limited to within 10' of the trunk and should he performed under the supervision of a consulting arborist. 0125ite Factors Du* to the variability of root locations, soil factor and individual trap peculiarities, I Can only generalize. Most impacts will relate to root damage during cut or fill operations. Based upon the move possible impacts during construction I suggest the follOutiUq mitigating met -!eras be implemented. I. Invigorate the tree., as recommended earlier, prior to impact to help build its remistance to stress. 2. If possible, fence the tree at its dripline to protect it from injury during construction activity. Strange as this may sound, tying a bright, yellow ribbon plastic band around the trunk during construction period does much to the added --awareness of its presence on construction crows. Prevent soil compaction around root zone; thins means reducing toot traffic to'a minim=. Construction c ► A+.-7.3 not be ,Uowed to trke breaks or lunch under this tree; an attractive,tsmPtaticu inasmuch as this will be the only shade available onaltte. 3. If grading or construction is to occur within the trees' dripline such activity should be performed by hand impl.ew;nts as heavy equipment is most damaging. 4, All roots greater than 3" that are cut during construction encounters should be immediately flush cut and covered by sorld or a tree seal. Damaged roots should be cub all the way back to healthy tissue an grading or trenching often breaks or shatters roots. 5. special design considerations should be implemented for either cuts or fills around the tree. 6. Any soil area that contains tree roots that will be exposed 5 longer than one day must be protected from moisture loss. This can be achieved by watering and/or placing a plastic trap over Vie ex7posed soil area. Construct retaining walls . or backfill excavated soil areas immediately to av ^_id moisture loss to the tree roots. 7. If tree suffers trunk or upper structural damage during c- Istruction it should be treated immediately as any delay c, a cause; further tissue dieback due to desiccation. S. Should construction activity cause s +lver3 moisture loss some irrigation and /or mulching may be needed. 9. Extended construction often causes COnaiderable dust collection on tree foliage. When this occurs food manufacture is reduced for an already weakened tree. Should this become a problem a washing of the foliage may become necessary. Although these items highlight the activities which may be encountered during construction other p�:cblems may crop up, In that event it would be wise to have .a conal -Ating arborist available to advise you wit4l. your field decisions and to ensure that pro,ier arboraeulture practices are affected. POST - CONSTRUCTION PHASE Transition time from a relatively undisturbed environment to urbanization is of great importance to established trees. It is important to irinitor the tree for pra�:14s and to evaluate post - construction maintenance. ).dc Amotkat of protection prior to or during t4a construction phase can abaolutely quarar�tee the survival and health of an impacted tree. Therefore, I strongly recommend.this tree be inupected every 6- months for at 2 -year period after. construction in order to give it very opportunity for survival.'` Even with the best of cars; - construction will impact this tree and some set backs may be expected. pest " problems, in particular, increase Aum to the weakening of the tree. those, aA4, other prgbllems, can be identified and dealt with during-a mon..o g period. SUMMARY The site Magnolia tree, for wri ^�i protection guidelines are outlined above, is the only erne onsite as of 26 JAN 87 that is viable enough to try saving. This tree, as does any mature, established tree, may present real and potential liability risks if planned development is constructed within its' dripline. If it is to be saved it in recormended that it be made a focal entrance point to the tract - not a part of the general landscaping in and around buildings. Conversely, any construction activity in and around its' dripline and root syst could adversely effect the overall health and vigor of Z:he tree. A delicate balance at best. F u have any guE sticiis or cO! me.1's. in YQgard to any =ati�n contained in this ievalu&t� mn arid` report do nut ate to give us'a call. Respectfully submitted RIECHM J HIU ar ii -+ Dic% Johnson, AsLA _ 6 ; Ho - icultural Consultant :ds XC: McMtchan. Pro � Perity CQ4►'iltaIlta, inc. 4 �a 1 i I LM LM `M LM NV Op "rj mc t M t M � f. 'e"' FC �__ 08 OP M GC t ®dt RANCHO CL:C,A,N'10,NGA TITLE: PLANNING DINrLcM EXHIBIT: ,, �---_ 0 2 �T ; C YACM GT{.tY7 1 � T .� {� �� _ � � � ' �� � I � T���i^ I w! -T�--1 ,( .! • I ' • � � 4T —KEer{ IA6<R yC�fiU I �l T �� .tip j 1 r_j lNl.�.],.�.., #,_�_ �L__�'• � � � .anu.tr� ' ! .s _ f "lam SAN 01gNAlIDIHO ROAD= L NORTH CITY OF J RANCI -D C CA"'101\` A Tom. F. tN lE F{ MILY [tFj!,SI%HCF. tµ TRAt} Not 74431 . " t � 4 BtRCti ST. ..= � •k...v ...ate. L_W+ I 1 .� ` .?,1 +,� �l �`} •.rs ate. FI�.'� t� p w .. ++� -� . , C'! ,- ,_.�. -�-G � t--� i '.�s ra.•. `fw.�.� '2 r,,.R• 1� �`�,,�i sa is F i o Ala°^. C ! �Wj7il? 31 Jr A p S; I1�It `ft ii.d. .I rs �wrt. �'r•... +r-,t. ,ar'..' wl x...< Y�2`r` yra_ r y yT �� TREES N �.� 'I T Ktar �.. �.l lei.• -. .'%�. �'ew.. s.era: +•.••��`. •_.. _ ;__ -..,. =1 r I` 9` . __� -� • � U( :•tor ` • _ .-... _•PH a �; �, -- � � � i ar.y s.... . 4 aw. aK • ar ar 4 ».•G � <a ♦r - i r�r : � . :' 'y� U 1 t t - --r liar 1 ..1� t( - [o. 41 �tZf�1 1 SINGLE• FAMILY REStiENCE� t Il lC?` IL NORTH CIT'Y7 Of lTE�t �34t� RANCHO CU C_ ,NIONvr� TtTr.E: >� `2 .4 iy, .�r7?ACT PLA.4` NG DIN!'LVION 1:XHI &"C;! �C% SCTtLE: -- ;..... r.- {l' �- ti -t } � ; 1NC.F µ1L R4 QNCE 11 L1 -1 .f 1 --- .! j4 y}7,_ l� aiJ. xsJ� 1 }e Q•P.1W� �si> �r�rs�.`r�.yi r-a.r.o /�� �•....�7i r- v.r.. /r' L_. }..) VVV ttt iT A •1_ ..1.... /�-- �•• b w r f� @! t 1! ...._ /�! �" �' ._ - •N�n~ � .. _ .. � - -} - °Q ..R -"'mss '� -F ril _ mL5. -_ to CC if 2L at P-7 ve � ' �'1 ' (� Jr0`. � . • T i.. Tn 'ate i ..... � n. � _ 1 � R r. »_.. -� • ,rid �� } • ' ��� y n to ... r ..:.es.�...i 4LS/ ! _ 1 ♦ t .111 ` �t i -�24 �1d - Ce!?,27 a I" j L STnrzE L_ t3� i 1 i is? rs T-'i t I i` -t y i1 r''' t I �. - 1` �' } 1 ' •"1 ._.y A. - I �L -.S ' 1� - %70. 737a - -i 1 SINGLE FAWLY REStOENCE: NORTH CITY OF 1TE.1 is "7 t3 RANCHO CLC- kN•10 G TITIE: PLANNING DIVISK)N EXHIBti'--- 1—......SCALE. •—c�• ;f� `�IN¢4 F MILT q—qlq of S�IESTE[! PLRN $Y €9EVEL i�Eft fRA Ns �3 r� , �Ir) •'�!.- `-- -..�,� ri-1 it ,. �! � � � J•! I�1 -ty. X11 i �.seg.J I r _�I `ll� „y f �t.w. �l�•,I� ' 1 1 { 1 f „►T r 44 i• �.3 her^ � � � -• � -'•I� ' ii/ , r - r t�.. = c:.:L° 'tom'; _-- _..:.�'- ... Nil \1 - *�-�i 37cla e //�Mr� ' � � �:''��f' 11 :r / '�.._�+.w. -=-'• l 7' < '.:=xi . tt 1!!! I I 1 -- f '' i 1 f110- r �t j c-�z� (EOLZ , Nei }F ARK 1._--I Ifr� �� �_- -•NO. 7a7i -_� L._.J SINGLE FAIAILY RESIDENCE. NORTH CITY OF AIM RANCHO L'C 10L GA TfTL> PLANNING DR'I5m EXHIBIT. „ », ,�. 1 a re.f r rrrr rrr� ��r.r % fl s C,Wa�Mf{t» --"v mamftav cefts" mow l4"l C:? am. mg, n rar t23 ,'! OF R��•� IJI VI KkV 7677 y t» f Ia+ uJ ` ' II1 � I �. yLE FAMILY g�al0EK4£ I r j NOt I �?g42.1 „- I ii I 1 I % ^� s •• { � p_)�j � i 1 _ -��� � ;o SIRCH Lul 1. Jd CYI OL R1 MI •i. C,`.1 T �y. 1 e� •" y� _ _ — _ tNa. ..sa.� yj� . to- ul _J TRE4CHES- (- --- j'&x'e C.T- tz 1 ` 51N:XdFAWly NESIoENC j ILA C.I7 i•I - -1 iO C? i INFERRED REDHILL FAUL1° CITY OF PLACNNENG 7 Trlu. zv6gq, a EXHIBrr. _ _y_� SCaLE: x, t 71 source. 2• Hydrologv, Will the proposal have significant results in: . M -OX/ C1T- OF RA.`iCHO C'UCAMO`;GA PART II' - SyITIAL S-rrDy Eh'VIROM-tENTAl, CHECKLIST APPLIC NT—. 2J", , ' G'(fi c'`.Ii4/ij FILING DATE: l��Lj+- 47 I.00 NiJMBER: T� "�i� SIG PROJECT. PROJECT LOCATION,: .EC h ENt'TROy:�STd� L_ 3�I4'ACTS (Explanation of all ' "yes" and "maybe" answers arr` required on attached sheets). YES *L�Y3F *10 1. Soils and Geoloev. Will the proposal have significant results in•; a. Urstablc J\round conditions or in changes in geolo ic`relati,onships? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or burial of the soil? C. Change in topography or ground surface contour intervals? d• The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? C- Any potential increase in wind or water erosion of soils, affecting either on or off site conditons? f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud - slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? %I. ,n increase in the rate of extraction and /or use of any mineral re source. 2• Hydrologv, Will the proposal have significant results in: . M -OX/ a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobi.e or indirect sources? Stationary sources? --- b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or Interference with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? E c. Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? 4. Biota Flora. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or number of any species of plants? b• Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare 4 or endangered species Of plants? Is -' YES' a - a. Changes ?.a currents, or the course of direction of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream charnels? b. Changes in absorption races, drainage patterns, or the rate JeA ' and amount of surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d- Cha:;g,�'in the amount of surface water in body of water? any f e. Discharge into surface waters, or any �✓ altzration of surface water quality? f. Alteration of sroundwater characteristics? g. Change in the quantity of groun.�waters, w either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interference with an 4 aquifer? Quality? F Quantity? R F h. The reduction in the amount of water other - wise available for public water supplis? f I- Exposure of peop'e or property to t >ater, related hazards such as flooding or seiches? e� 3. Air OuslitV, Will the proposal have significant .._ 4 results in: a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobi.e or indirect sources? Stationary sources? --- b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or Interference with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? E c. Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? 4. Biota Flora. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or number of any species of plants? b• Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare 4 or endangered species Of plants? Is -' YES t va 1 c. Intruduction of new or disruptive. species of plants into an area? d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural production'. Fauna. Will the proposal have significant results _ in: a. Change in the characteristics or species, including diversity, distribution, or numbers of any species of animals? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rate or endangered species of animals? C. Introduction of new or disruptive species of Y animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or _J wildlife habitat?� 5. Porulation. Will the proposal have significant results in: a, Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of the huhan population of an area! b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 6. Socio- Economic Factors. Will the proposal have significant results ins a. Change in local or regional socio- economic characteristics, including economic or comtiercial diversity, tax rate, and property values? b. Will project casts be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax payers or project users? 7. Land Use and Plannine Considerations. Will the praposal have significant results in? a. A substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, Policies, or adopted Plans of any governmental entitits? c. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of existing consumptive or non - consumptive recreational opportri Iz ATV 0 -X YES 8. Transportation. Will the proposal have significant results I,_ a. Generation of substantial adda "lional vehicular Y` movement? b. Effects on existing streets, ,or demand for never street construction? C. Effects on existing parking facilities, or _.._. demand for new parking? d. Substautial impact upon existing transporta- tion systems? e. Alterations to present patterns of circular �✓ tion or movement Of people and /or goods ?, f. Alterations to or effects-en present and Potential water - borne, rail., mass transit or air traffic? g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 9. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, paleontological, and /or historical resources? _ 10. Health. Safetv and Nuisance Factors. ;fill the �. proposal have significant results in. a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? .. A risk of explosivr, or 'release of hazardous substances in the event of an accident? d. An increase in the number of individuals .� or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organises? e. Increase in existing noise levels? ✓ f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous noise levels? g. The creation of objectionable odors'? h. An increase in light or glare? 0 -X t i I] iaye YES _4F_ SE ti0 11. Aesthetics. hetics. Will the proposal have resul significant ts in: a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic vista or view? b. The czeation of an aesthetically offensive — site? c. A conflict with the objective of , designated or potential scenic corridors? 12. Utilities anti Public Services. Will the proposal have a significant need fcr sTM, new s aleerations to the following: ,teps, or a. Electric power? b. Natural or packaged gas ?, c. Communications systems? 4.. Water supply? e. Wastewater facilities? f, Flood control structures? g. Sold waste facilities? h. Fire protection? I. Police 7_! �%trction? J,, Schools ? o k. Parks or other recreational acilities? 1. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads and flood control facilities? m. Other governmental services? 12. EnereX• and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in: a• Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy? ✓ C. An increase bal the demand for development of new sources of energy? d. An increase or perpetuation of the cansuepti of non - renewable forms of energy, when ',,siblon e renevabie sources of energy are availe:.r? °frail °. �p'T. �HL YS� e, Substantial depletion of any nonrenewab i le p scarce natural resource? br 14. Mandatow F3 '.Ai ngs of Siaificance a,. Does thE' project nave the potential CO degrade Potential the quality of the t- reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal, community, reduce the number or restrict the;,ange of a rare or endangered plant or animal ''Qr eliminate important examples of the major pf-riods of California history or prehistory ?''. i l b. Does the project have the potential to achieve t shor term, to the disadvantage of long - Cerra, environmental goals? (A short -term ltaaact on the enviro,=ent is one which occurs in a re*Iatively brief, definitive period of time while ) }ong- term impacts will endure well into the future). c. Does the project have impacts which are s individually limited,, but cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable ° means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when Viewed in connection with the effects of past prdlects, and probable future projects). d. Does the project have environmental effects E which will cause substantial adverse effects ° on human beings, either, directly or indirectly? II. DISCUSSION OF EN�*.ONM4TAL EVALUATION (i.e.. of affirmative answers to the above questions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures). � III: D$TD�*i1yAiIS7�I � • \ On the basis of this, initial evaluation: I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant efftct on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will -be prepared,' I find that although the proposed project could have a signi ficant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case beu�use the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGAT1G,E DECLARATION VILL BE PREPARED. j"--� I find the proposed project MAY have a :significant effect on the envi ant, and an ENVIRO`7,1LrNT IMPACT REPORT is required. w Date Signature Title r. �i ADDENDUM TO INITIAL STUDY, PART II ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST TENTATIVE TRACT 13476 »3 1. F�1S and Gea'agy (b. and c.) The grading concept will necessitate the displi6)�ment and burial of existing soil to imnstruct buildable pads and Install public streets.. the resulting „<<rading activity will alter existing �1 �1 topography to a marginal degree, Final aspects of the grading plan will be under the review and direction of the Building an4 safety Department. Cg.i The subject site may expose people and praperi~{ to a seismic � occurrence. The ” ogical investigation for Tentative Tract 13476 k reveals, no trane of the inferred Red Hill Fault on the ,.P,4bject_ `h ; site. However, adverse seismic impacts may occur from regionally associated seismic activity. � Z.. Hy4ml o 1 t M. and 1.) The project will change area absorption rates due to construction of impervious surfaces, thereby Increasing the amount of surface runoff. However, all aspects of drainage, including means of conveying surface flows and appropriate drainage facilities, will be under 'ate direnction of the City Engineer accordinS[ to the final Hydrology and Drainage Report. 10. Health and 7luisance Factors _ (e. anJ h.) The project will increase existing noise levels and levels in light and glare, however such increases will be no greater than similar used. A z r - RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE BANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY 'OF RANCY4, CUCAMONGA,. CALIFORNIA,. CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTMIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13476 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 13476, hereinafter-' "Map" submitted by Dean Williams, applicant, for the purpose of evbdividing the real property situated in the City of 'Rancho Cucamonga, County o:� San Bernardino, State of California, described as a'residential subdivision of 37 lots on 9.7 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2 -4 dwelling ur•its per acre) located on the northeast corner of Hellman Avenue and Tryon Street - APN: 208- 111 -04 into $7 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on June 10, 1987; and WHEREAS, the'City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and ;. VHLREAS, the Planning Commission his read and, considered -`the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considerad other evidence presented at the public hear'ang. N;Q, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: T ."e Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 13476 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The Tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the ten "ative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision.. fl X21 PANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTI�IN NO'. TT 13476 - WILLIAMS PROPERTY CONSULTANTS Jure 10, 1987 Page 2 (a) That this project will not create adversf. impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative 'Tract Map No. 13476 a copy of which is attached hereto, inhere y approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: Planning Division: I. Tne construction of a 6' higir'conmon masonry wall along the project's eastern perimeter shall be provided. 2. Concrete insets shall be provided in planter cut -outs for street trees along Hellman Avenue. 3. The applicant shall provide details of a 6' high decorative masonry wall (i.e. cap, pilaster) a,ung Hellman Avenue to the City Planner for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 4. The applicant shall provide a landscaping plan for the parkway and areas adjacent to the masonry wall along Hellman Avenue to the City Planner for review and approval prior to issuance of buildin permits. 5. Lots 16 and 22 shall provide minimum 7,200 square feet of lot area. 6. Preserve magnolia tra_ un Lot 13. 'rouse shall be plotted accordingly. Tree shall be protected during construction per Municipal Code Section 19.08.110. Tree shall be carefully pruned amd maintained per the January 26, 1987 report from Richard P. Johnson and in accordance with proper arborical practices. Engineering Division:. 1. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Hellman Avenue shall bP undergrounded from the first pole on the south side of Tryon Street to the first pole off -site north of the north of, boundary prior to public, improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. Reimbursement of one -half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development as it occurs on the opposite side of the street is rot feasible because the property is presently developed'. 2, Notice of intention to -orm and/or join the Lighting and Landscaping D U01 ct shall be filed with the City CouRzil prior to recordation of the map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. N Woo ri, 11 PLANNING COMMISSfON RESOLUTION NO, TT 13476 WILLIAMS PROPERTY CONSULTANTS ; June 10;, 1987 P{ -fie 3 3. The existing structures located on the project site shall be \ removed prior to recordation of the final map or ao agreement and bond guaranteeing removal of the structures. within one -year ihall be posted with the City prior to recordaf1on of the final map. e 4. The finish floor elevations for those Tots itfcated on Hellman Avenue shx;i be above the 100 year flood level as determined by the finar' drainage /flood study. 5. The pro3ect shall be protected from flows entering the site from the north in particular flows entering at the northwest corner,�t. to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. APPROVED Af,19 ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY 2= ,,-JUNE, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAWNGA BY: Larry T. McNie , Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary I, Brad Buller, Dep;,ty Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolutit.r. was duly and regularly introduced passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucp• nga, at a regular meeting of the Planni!�g, Iommission held on the 10th day of Jur,,q, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: HOES: C�1MMISSIONERS: ABSCNT: COMMISSIONERS; Ki u 771 C xa}' O =a —Gy Cam. l— b V =.I b ?Z 4VRn�. L L ..•iii m Y up u6 ANIL Tr 6 ' � 3 � d �N v S,a eY. O� a �!• .Cp �`. It� �4 x uj xO —e a L' L 01p� uR4 Yd +z uN � m� mpa C 03 �O,dp NyW _i tl�ix1 Y nqY Cb CN Z_ J ^�L �"•,. EO! - yys ■ A am �. o.l Cp�.���� -omv�. �m����i. 1�a P y�r mss. ■Cyxx■y LLSO V/<1� o a ma $tiiu I a - 1o�4 u�+ a Is a "tee «q 11 O. CC y .tigsn` ir. �' q � ,L �713W•�a �..a° $ ash e n o ac $m..w ra ; arm b �. V G F r V 4! Q E r i -Al a4L F Y _ y �� `✓ r G L p a y 1 E�w GK p= dGW�1•'i4 Cq NU Y7.- � c ;M �y r LV° � a °O. °>� Rica tlll�'`,• i Lt�6: .p.r p . -°� W� O � CO yW r•G L 1 �j DaG R CW +p 4th V Q(Oy ar =e NS+ r- 04� >E O�jta a��i A °}tVa.N. rQ.YCCYY °o'. Y S-341 Nv°n u9c7. -vu. 2. ��y[ v L g L q= p ` N a N r v 3 + Y y V 9 $=sue c .;e • D�i�m yvL? .wGV S01�. }a� ...Z -9 R3rn'7� ': �= 1 ■�y� ��- `o �r"ltla CY GG~ SC 6G G V Qar ■ ~y d P G 4.4 Y6C a� eY:�>fY� i�vp � 4,�b.4 � ~� aO DTI GG ,ybpo 9NE <Cv.6 t3 pGNYYw y�r+.N MI. 'C'SiN YV V$- .22 NN 13.-� Wwr. ]t �dC <lM1.w� N6q •.' N A q YaoQ dE- �y5. G +Y 4 d l q Y �Y t g Y4r4 N w Y Q bN O p �i v � C _ b•rC 6 4 rw t ` 4 PC�� YC Syii s s G Gz q N1b d G b_ E \ \ \ \K d SG d .r r=i 6 H •C� G Gf. p q' a sp`u y'■` ■a N O• L�� r L M �i E y L uL 47 ` b v 4 Cao tn� asc 1�WV'iQw. �� VDT as .tni .+ ��YL `.O iiY q1 e e 6� fY ��° -yC q YYr C9 �pyLry upQ yr�W i� iaL4�a�Oaq $nL d .�179 3.. wk.0 Nao p al Z d L'/y. 8'L �Q1lr�rpiL �q �L v�os& vay�_a ...� N rme CGL r 1 d QC e rCrLL . �y ydy CQa .L.x c�F� .O OGG2y �LWeC9 a.°i 1T.ETJpw C�N LyY cuas'.c� vCrh N °- b NA y V� 5y L q� 2': Y O Oi27 � fS t di y W cj GV ,1 C s ig 94 L9 g A si V-241t 9-0- S. s CL OLyY 4.1 =n 22'-s-si- A- 26 :1 'agj 86=4 1 t Ti 30 1c k ru au =4 2.1.2 4 gp MR 5H Eg E r- I -.2 1 S;- z2Z - �2 a Ism z -4-z 53 8:5 415 - Eza - re cz tl= s 9 Zia ii M t 4 -Sav zt,; pie oa M -0c, 9 ]we Ul 3; ^ r �a °��6Y Gq Vd yi q �•A v� fLC■yS L °j PU i �U °_ V LL S4� a u `y L&J _ _EE G pp Ci Z ,�y�3 Cis C.L LU■ °y� W °�yO.. jMNW� R`vr C 4 A � '.y. �o Qyoo.tl s ■°v ,�_v a¢ `CU� 'c V 6M J _ w CQ J L wS :F� jV m _y Li• Ne0 C'VQ Ly r�tltl C • ?. {y� yq�tl Y tGep ��V�!?. O. ��. FAN $vE o; °!w S muO °o ■ ■u yboVrw cw °an r.d� 6�wKS o N ( —Yq�j O$YftO tlC�A re M 46 K � g `dnY __- Qa Fes. $Q 3' HK U� iW NY�q uUW W�6d14N f•.`�. N.. O.V !fyy1 c +�� A6 ^�Y NNwtli •°+ �,i Y�N r 7V w.�q L ^9 O d d 1.2 y 3 •C Z9 $.'.ffi u N.q� =cQ+ ccm �. q,a'r.;, �. p. 1a ate+ g` p • hR '�� 'r 7i y`T. � � T rs � M �� ice« � -j S �$m $k$. � jCVYy � L`v'+Y ne � <. W�:w•i. Cs" T "o' y �.•�. N L u s N =a r ^° n �•yy. n °o�' ." _`°•l$u _ys CiaM � V.M.•. as >V ... N. �n nN �JL H'�g 6 ^_4N as 1.2 p M VTy JjE �C• �� r n $C . N yy■3■ ��C Y� C e .� v>9CC 6 O N 7 a CW 4 I O C Z 2 L°YY q ^R tl j y d a V LL 9G AL 4e•� VN� g�a1 .C•KC CL.C.TP °�cp Na: VN..�r NS jO ISM L a 6 k d V mi �I +`y E- c3 w 'o a !f ai.f 5 oc 0 o vg at t u° og C` g N C py 49yyyYyA dye t • y ��} O Y$ O. O L + pRZ C —b RM � °ryi �'Ry N'� 4 ��!A ii■ w �9 Y N \' �it9� tz g +-8 �A 5. erg' 'g$ yVo . A- J - `l YC .VS Zola a`{pyyy p@` 7aa rb fI e`rp �y/ f y b a-- Mra y Y M V Y O > A =� :C Z�soe § ° g >.- r J. s "�� :its �> a F1 evil I'l a 33 IL y Y O € « ::° gg= °g3¢`gw N�3s >Y "�'� $a °airs •°"� LB� �$ .a u 0 71 I e 77 u L . � e w. o m w N$M.Grt upC L �} y 0 L (�� M c 01 S �O as ^a RCN ^��. eN� L N 4 j C di 4A � L 4yN i G w GG'.�.N O y A Ow a N V ;S rM`q N Y ry N N 3 r gyyy N y r i � O 3 _` Y Y fGfyy 4 � { ■C� Y r M' ,•O. a. aLi <.CV+ Qj pP D Q.yt QL 4 O Of y�y N Y. \` H � d IS 964. Y �OA N. Q �_�. id p'n'• i e Ljy 6�. M s� .0 72 r G_�o� �N iC�W C Mp Yr DY. �•� _` �� E�• r �Y ;�,�GGp�ptL` « L> y �w � OrM yy� 0.� W.y.NL 4H p ap tIV t�L. w I e 77 u v Li � e L N$M.Grt O L �} 1E, 0 L (�� M c 01 S �O as ^a RCN ^��. eN� L N 4 j C 4 L O G tl N rM1 Lr N w N V ;S rM`q N Y ry N N 3 r gyyy N y r i � O 3 _` Y Y fGfyy 4 � { ■C� Y r M' ,•O. a. aLi <.CV+ W i pP D Q.yt QL 4 O Of y�y N 9 y �a wain a 6. ey 0 6S jSr a„ 9 � q gab Ny ti N f a Y N oa M a � � $irt t� VO VN 1d)$ a yE -7y- 1•�MYW a(p u. a N$M.Grt Mi GMp iii �> w L.O Lwpp ~G� pOt�•�. RCN ^��. eN� Q p�W pry �V'4 S�yV LA'�Gw nyCO 6�1 tYL��� yn6 �Qa LNG Cot �$e4 uV: ��` GNV N6W.wr w: OY Y. \` H � d aL c o: oe YsY� e Y ° =. C u^ � L 0 o <z q L « ` I .o I i $ppNly�`M ya <y 0' « L Y 1.i 2z r� e I i ��eCk1;,"E E Ey¢Md�22� • •� � � � O � E E's�G ^ �� Ou+ � ^y��' � lit Z ZI y c c •�L6 � ��Y a a aq? `c c c�iL L L o c !I Ir`l __ viii vt xrna�vtxv vuuturlvtvuri CLCA'KO;y STAFF REPORT �e. C RATE; June 10, 1987 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Huller, City Planner BY: Cindy Morris, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -18 -- EDWARDS RANCHO CUCAMONGA 'rte ' a propose aMfloR o amusement evices in an exil;!` 'ng recreational facility located in the General Commerc'al District, 7988 Haven Avenue - APN 1077- 661 -U7, and 08 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: ' A. Action Re nested; Approval of a non- construc:fon Conditional use Permit. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Existing ommerc a ecreation. Center; general Commercial South. - Existing Virginia Bare Center; General Commercial East - Existing Commercial facilities /Haven Avenue; Spneral Commercial West - Vacant; Industrial Specific Plan & Subarea 17 C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - C- omaera3T North Commercial South - Commercial East - Commercial West - Industrial Park D. Site Characteristics: The project involves the interior addition of mechanical-equipment to ao'existing room within the 25,188 square foot. Edwards Rancho Cucamonga Theater located on 13 acres of land within the Virginia D+jre Center. E. Applicable Regulations: Per Section 17.10.30 F -2 of the City of--F. anc o ucamonga- Development Code, the installation of more than three amusement devices within an existing recreation facility requires a Conditional Use Permit. ITEM I PLANNTKk�COMMISSICN STAFF REPORT CUP 87 -18 - EDWARDS THEATER dune 10, 1987 Page 2 11, _ANALYSIS: Y A. General, The n game area will occupy 231 square fe_t of the -gie-conct i floor balcony in an area between the two restrooms and ` adjacent to the projection room, (Exhibit C). Currently there are three (3) machines in place, to which the-�pplicant proposes g twelve 's will bed no change In the theaters regular operating only hours. The amusement devices will be available only to movie patrons du,i)g the cinema's regular operating hours. The primary i.4tues- related to the addition of an arcade within a ri2creational facility are compatibility and the availability of s;-4ervi sion. �A e amusement devices (i.e. •inbali or video games) are propided for entertainment of vie patrons before and during j • irtbmission. The ��+,ade veil " be accessible only to paying 1 �.astomers, and thus, -hJuld not generate additional pedestrian trlffic or parking demand. Further, the devices aim located an the second floor in a well - defined area that will nk ,� obstruct or crowd entries, exits or aisles. j In addition, there should be adequate superwYsion provfloG as games ames will be located within audio and. visual contact from the down~tairs lobby aid projection room. The Management has indicated that they maintain constant supervision of the arcade rea, both first -hand and visually. B. Envi"mental AssU tent: The project is categorically exempt from prov s ons of e Califnrnia Environmental Quality Act per Article 19 Section 15301. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS i 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan and objectives-�Df the development Code as evidenced by the Condit-_1-141 Use Permit provision for amusement devices. Z. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use cwpiies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. Inv 6 L 10 PLANNTN(�c N 1I' F REPORT CUP 87_18, EATER June 10, 1987 Page 3 IV, CORRESPONDENCE: This item as been advertised has a Public Hearing in the T e-DWily, KopQrt newspaper, property posted and notices sent to all property owners and existing tenants within 360 feet of the project. V. REMENDATION: �Y ff recommends that the ning C&Inission approve W�on&F,�Use Permit 87-18 through the ",��,Ioption'of -0.,- attached Resolut-1k I q ��nd Conditions" of Approval. i� Res tfuliy bmitted, Brad Suer pity planner BB:CN:sgr Attachments: Letterxfrom Applicant Exhibit-'.-I'A" v,�Locatlon Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Floor Plan Exhibit "Du - Resolution of Approval with Conditions i May 3, 3 City o Rancho Cucamonga Comm4'ry Development Department Planning Commission 9340 Baseline Road Suite Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Purpose of Conditional Use Permit, Ron- Construction To Whom It Concerns: 1. Proposed business operation is to provide an entertainment center. 2. Hours of operation opening 5 p.m. weekdays and 11:30 a.m. Saturday and Sunday. Closing after last show about midnight_ 3. Number of employees on largest shift: 10.,, 4. Request the permit to install more than three (3) amusement devices to provide addit onal entertainment for patrons during intermission and those who arrive early for a movie.. 5. No patrons are allowed to enter-'for the .sole pur- pose of using any amusement device. Sincerely, EDWARDS THEATRES CIRCUIT, INC. Hugh C. Randolph Property Management Administrator HCR /ns .I [A Q CITY OF ITF-M- 17- RA's 'CH 0 r A CUCA-NI'l()�NG" TITLE. PLANNING Dj�rISKN EXHIBIT, SCALE. T 3. A NORTH r!1'It►rr� i Oz f qy 3 Uz lit 1 l 1 �.'.J €tt i' .• . t r Em ITP`• 5.. ITMnur1 l , �� CT[ �'- ute a. r, �� y j,� M T- Iil.ittti Cfl ^+. rr . l NORTH.- OF ITF.M- PLANNING DIVTSIZ N EXHIBtr: Q E W1 } a III � ��"��• N �� � w ss�� S rry I III - � ,= U • � t1 � 1 CITY (^Q�p ��F�� I l/ �• ( /�� ITEM, r. I� LA:'Nlirt DIL tSKd TITLIa =.'1_�►` DCHIB —rr --4 __._ CALF: �. r r* ;; RESOLUTION NO. A, RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING C"ISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL UK PERMIT NO. 87-,18 EDWARDS RANCHO CUCAMONGA THEATER .FOk THc ADDITION OF 12 AMUSEMENT DEVICES LOCATED AT 7988 HAVEN AVENUE IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. WHEREAS, on the 20th day of May 1987, a complete application was filed by Edwards Rancho Cucamc,.ga Theater for review of the above - described Plr' project; and WHERE'S, on the 10th day of June 1987, the Rancho Cucamonga Manning Commissio► held a public hearing to consider the above - described project. NOW. THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as f0 1Owse SECTION 1: That the fol owing f #,;sings can be met: t 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives bf—the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. ?. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or .materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vi ciili ty. 3. That the proposed use ,,complies with each of the applicable provisions_OV-the- Development Code. SECTION 2; That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environmen'�' is categorically exe4,n>t from the provisions of California Environmental Quallty Act per'Article It Section 1530-1. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 87 -18 is approved subject to e o Towing conditions: 1. The amusement devices shall be limited to use by cinema patrons and shall be limited to the same hours of operation as the cinema. 2. The amusement devices shall be placed in a manner that does not obstruct or crowd entries, exits or aisles. 3. Adult supervision shall be provided at all times. BY: Larry T. McNie1r;-5-aT—r=jT- ATTEST: Brad u e-F. Deputy acre ar`y 1, Rrad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify toat the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of June, 1987, by the forlowing vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMIS'SI.ON•RESOLUTION NO. CUP 87 -18 - ED tiOS THEATER - June 10, 1987 Page 2 qW 4, Adequate noise attenuation shall be provided to insure that amuse.lent 'device noise is not audible inside any-theater. 5, If the operation of this Conditional Use Permit causes adverse effects to neighboring businesses or to the primary cinema use, the Conditional'. Use Permit shall be brought before the Plasining a,•. Commission for their review and possible termination of the,use. ,. 6. Thai approval of this request shalt waift ,not ca fiance with all sections of the Development Code 'All other applicable City Ordinances in effect the time of occupancy. f 7. That any modification, relocation, increase in the - number of amusement devices expansion or other change in operatio"ill require a revision to this Conditional Use Permit. APPROVED AND ADOPTED T9IS 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Aob BY: Larry T. McNie1r;-5-aT—r=jT- ATTEST: Brad u e-F. Deputy acre ar`y 1, Rrad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify toat the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of June, 1987, by the forlowing vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: �3 3 C E 1;r-Ul Ur n"U.UV 1U:,A)AM0NIiA STAFF REOk DATE; June 10, 1987 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission - FROM: Barrye Hanson, ;Senior Civil Engineer BY: Barbara Krali, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Time extension and Modification of Conditions - Parcel Ma - Crowell Brothers - A modification to add a conditioFfer utility un er9rounding and a request for an extension of time for the project located at the southeast corner of Baseline Road and Carnelian Street (APN 207 -031- 28) BACKGROUND: Tentative Parcel Map 5786 as shown on Exhibit "C" was initially approver, by the Planning Commission on June ls; 1984, for an initial two, year period until June 12;, 1986. The first of a possible three one -year time extensions was grantd.rrt May 28, 1986 extending the approval period until June 13, 1987: The applicant is now requesting the second of the possible three one -year extensions. The letter of request (Exhibit "All) is attached for your reference. ANALYSIS: It is current policy of the Planning Ccanission to modify the original conditions of approval to include a <:andition for the undergrpunding of existing overhead'' utility fines. This condition is included under Section 3 of the attached Resolution. -The Planning Commission, however, cannot conditionally approve a time extension for a Tentative Parcel Map. There; ,)re, tie Planning Commission may either deny the extension based on inconsistencies with current City Policy, approve the extension with 3niy those conditions that were required with the original approval or approve the extension with the modification with the consent of the Developer. ITEM J e Planning-Commission Staff Report Parcel Map 8786: ,tune IOx 1987 ." Page 2 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning 'C mmission adopt the attached res:.lution with modifications approving a one -year time extension for Parcel Map 8786 with the consent of the Developer. The ne7w'expiration date would be June 13, 1988. Respectfully submitted, Sarryet. Hansar, Senior Civil Engineer BRH:HK :jh �' Attachments: Developer's Letter (Exhibit "A") " Vicinity Map (Exhibit "B ") Tentative Map (Exhibit "C ") Resolution and Recommended Conditions of Approval JJJ r• e CROWELL 'BROTHERS, INC. 521 N. Mountain Avenue Suite A Upland, CA 91786 May 6, 1987 City of Rancho Cucamonga j 9220 Bassline Road, Suite 0., Ranc' —) Cucamonga, CA 91730 'Attention: Russell Maguire, City Engineer Dear Mr. Maguire: This latter is a request for an extension of time for 'Tentative Parcel Map No. 5786. As of this date, .W® have not been able to develop a use that is economically vianlaA. Currently we arc negotiating with an individual for a sale and the construction of an office -type building. This is still in a very prel?minary state, so it is too early to make any firm re resentations in reference to this_site. p Enclosed you will find our check for $52. With the check and this letter in hand, we hops you hAVO everything you will need to grant the extension. if you need anything further, please Gon- taCt ms. Sincerely, CR LL BROTHERS, INC. UDaviY'A/E Cooper Director of Project Planning DAC /lh Enclosures ,'T'ira' xY�slStn�! PM 5`if3� T1Ts 6ev r+PEiS t rrFg '= 3 " �" CITY OF RANCHO CUC.AMONGA► E IMMIL IF I " TENTATIVE PARCEL ,a AP NO. - 5 7 8 6 "'IT i ar i tru4t aM � ctn r iii��yo aTrpu tcnue a rtvis:ar hl fYat c s'�i. w w 4iY G a1N1:144tefYi7Y4P!{ rer4ee: uu+.�1e.. � b. sr�sy �� %etE+ i► a ar ig Oi 1tl CAI.IY fF SN �.M+�YIO, 5T4�L ,rsi ytt.�te{ wr, `•ao • J1C•!' � l /fi A4C�OIr �'Y�taA{/wts •IOLG J4.,a - 'tORMPAi6 ptl: � ='wKtt 4•nai.�� .i. �� ..rl � ate rrcafrrs.m+An•;a�/nr.I _ _ 1 M RIM. rt..w w,ura-t w, w: R 7 $ NOT I' j= W AMT , Awt X 'I irk / Q�.)o ff <fta w `y r d St6Mt'111'S 1gtr,5 i� w.1}�� �.� M I(1� ±1st • O Nt•tt i NM ri•t w1Yt Y l..N I.titl IA rrttisei•i toile tJ rJ . tifO.. MnifY .KM tit —alt. tttlJJ.. WiMdM.11<Yt.IIIllii ►ritliti RESOLUTION NO, 84 -50 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE C-1 OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 5786 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. 5786) LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE AND CARNELIAN STREET WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel. Map Number 5786, submitted by Crowell Brothers and consisting of 2 parcels, located at the southc,st corner of Base Line and Carnelian Street being a division of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 4869, as recorded in Parcel Map ,,"ook 49, Pages 46 and 47, records of San Bernardino County, State of Califon,, X, and WHEREAS, "on May 4, 1984, a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above- described Tentative Map; and WHEREAS, on June 13, 1984, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above - described map. FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISS.,N RESOLVED AS SECTION : That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is l consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. i 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health p 'Jems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse environmental impacts and a Negative Declaration, is issued on June 13, 1984. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 5786 is approved subject to the recommended Conditions of Approval pertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JUNE, 1984. ?LANNTNG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I i _ 8Y: `` 1 Dennis L. Stou C airman ATTEST: Ri mez, eputy ecretary T_ Yi Tn.'R._ ; ..,,.Ai"^ fl" ^"T...�.?y YF�y'� Resolution No. 4 Page Z I, Rick Come4, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of u Rancho Cucamonga eta hereby certify tkat the fO egging Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, 'passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City Of Rancho' Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of June, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit. AYES: COMW — aNERS; REMPEL, McNiEL, BARKER, STOUT J NOES: COMMISSTONERS: NONE s ABSENT. MIMISSIONERS: NONE €e i, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL LOCATION: Southeast corner of Base Line TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 5786 and Carnelian an Street � .DATE FILED:. May 4, 1984 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel 2 of Parcel Map NUMBER OF LOTS: 2 . 4869, as recorded in Parcel Map 49 Pages GROSS ACREAGE :_ 7,249 ' 46 & 47 Record(i of San Ber>oardipA County, ASSESSOR PARCEL NO :207- 031 -28 -` i tate o �a 1foN' "a - DEVELOPER OWNER ENGINES /SURVEYOR '~ Crowed] Brothers same _Associated rnoin ?ers _ 521 q. Mountain Ave. 316 East "E' °'stFeet ui e ' Upland, CA 91756 Ontario, CA 9G4 . Improvement and dedication requirements in accordance Keith T1 tle % /16 of the Municipal Code of the City of Rancho Cucarrnga joclgde, but may not be limited to, the fallowing: Dedications and Vehicular Access 1. Dedications shall be made of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the fo'lc'ing rights- of -wal on the following streets: additional feet on additional feet on additional feet on 3. Corner property line radius will be require per City Standards. 4. All rights of vehicular ingress and egress shall be dedicated as follows: x 5. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all common roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by C,C. &R.s and shall be recorded concurrent with the map. -1- � J ^ 8' X 6. All existing easements lying within future right -of -way are to be quitclaimed or delineated on the map per City Engineer's requirements. ?F Easements for sidewalk for public use shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private property, 4' 11 ,Surety 1. Surety shall bd posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Enginear and City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the Public improvements prior to recording for and /or prior to building permit jssuance or X 2. A lien agreement musk be executed prior to .recording of the map for Base Line Road, See condition #11 on Pag•,S. 3. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed, guaranteeing completion of all on -site drainage facilites necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Bivison prior to recording for and /or prior to issuance of building permit for Street Im roveent —rsan t i ty -- of Ranch Cucamonga Munic. >.si Code, Title 16, Section 15.36.120, the subdivider may enter into an agreement and post security with the City guaranteeing th;- -- equired construction prior to recordation of the map and /or building permit issuance. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on aY.. interior streets. 2. A minimum of 26 -foot wide pavement within a 40 -foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be constructed for all haif section streets. 3. Construct the followirg missing improvements: Prior to recordation for Prior to building permit issuance or Street Name ur Clutter Pvmt. e- Walk rive Appr. treet Trees tr Light eet s A. D A. M i e an Island* Other _.._ _., ...y ...., n i 190L lull un meLer -2- T q 4. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from, the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. 5. Street improvement plates shall be prepared by a Registered Civ, r" Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to NI issuance of an encroachment permit. G. ©evelfper shall coordinate, and where necessary, .pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing ;public utilities as necessary. 7. Existing lines of I2KV or Tess fronting the property shall be undergrounoed. 8, Install appropriate street name signs, traffic control signs, striping end markings with locations and types approtc+d by the City±- iginaer. s Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Lights shall be on decorative poles xith underground service, 10. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submittew to and approved by the Planning.` nivision prior to the issuance of bu�ldi% permit, 11. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Undersidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards. Drainage and Flood Girtrol 1. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated or noticed on zhe finaI-map. 1f 2. !Adequate provisions s%)l l be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 3 The following storm drain shall be installed to the satisfaction. of the City Engineer 4. Prior to recordation of the map, a hydrologic and drainage study for the project shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review. 5. A drainage detention basin per City Standards shall be constructed to detain increased runoff -3- Grading X I. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted «�. grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved, conceptual grading plan: X 2. A soils report shall be prepard by a - qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work prior ,o issuance of building permit. 3. A geological report shall be prepareo';iy -- a qualified engineer �. or geologist and submitted at the` --time of application or grading plan check. 4; The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by ;the Grading Committee and shall be ;completed prior to R,' �? ore�tian of the final subdivision viap or issuance of building permi', whichever comes first. X S. rinal grading Mans for each partil are to oe submitted to the Building and Safety Division for c °pproval prior to issuance of building permit. General Requirm ats and Approvals X 1. Permits from other agencies will be required as folf1ws: CalTrans for San Bernavain0 County o0 ontr0 '' iStriCt X Cucamonga County Water District for sewer and water San Bernardino County Dust Abatement (required prior to issuance of a grading permit) Other 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (C.r,.&.q.$) approved by the City Attorney is required prior to recordation of the map: X 3. Provide all utility services to each lot including sewerage, water, electric power, gas and telephone. X 4. Sanitary sewer and water ::ystems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District st& iards. A letter of acceptance is required. Easements to C.'%W.D. are required for sewer and water. 5. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CalTranslSan Bernardino County Flood Control District. X 6, Apirovals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requiretnents that may be received from them. -4- CITY OF RANCHO C1I::AMMiA LLOYD B. PuBa5, CITY ENGINEER -5- J -lam 's J j, X L The filing of the tent'Aive map or approval of same does, not 9 guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested: When building permits, <. are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will b .r asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will 1 not be issued unless said. ';!rtificati4;n is received in writing. 8. Local and Master Planned Trails shall be provided in accordance with th6 Trail Plan, A detail�4 trail plan indicating`Widths, maximum slopes` rvPhysical conditions, fencing and weed control, in • accordance �;, it City trail ,tandards, shalj�-A submitted to d approved by the City .Planner prior to ?recordation f -� " and /or prior to built Ag permit � ssuan'ce`r9r ; 4. -prior to recording, a deposit shall/be posted with the City ` covering the estimated cost of aprgrtioning the assessments under assessment District 82 -1 among the newly created parcels. X _ 1q.. At the f1me of final map submittal, tte• following shall be tiubmitted: Title Report, traverse calculations. (sheets), copies of recorded maps and oeAs used as reference ar_d /ory.. Slowing or'' final land division, and bend ,�arKs' referenced. X 11. ' The condirior) .}requiring a lien Cgveement #or future constrsction vz :_„a median island on Base Line may be waived pending resolution by the City Council :the policy. of median island X 12. Access easements f%s"bughJ the drive or designated `parking areas by "Not A Part" orb the map shall be provided by the C.C. &Rs. _X 13. n - Prior to recording, a six, fOct masonry wall shall be required along the . property tine between Parcel 2 and ,roperty to the south,_ The wall Shall be compatable in appearance with the existiWq office building and residetv�es. The landscaping on -the south perimeter of Parcel 2 shall ire augmented *a provide a Significant increase acceptable to the pity Planner. - X 14. Prier to recording,'a;six foot fer,7:e shall be pro. -tided from the southeast corner of Parcel 2 a sufficient distance to the north to discourage access to residential property to he south. CITY OF RANCHO C1I::AMMiA LLOYD B. PuBa5, CITY ENGINEER -5- J -lam RF, RESOLUTION N0. F; " A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING THE TIME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 5786' WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension for the dbOVE- descri,iad project, pursuant to Section 1.501.8.2 of Ordinance 28 -B, the Subdivision Ordinance, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above- described tentative parcel map., SECTION 1• The Rancho Cucamonga Planning. Commission has made the following 7in tags: A. That current economic, mar%etiitg, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable to build at this time. B. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would ►�i"5e consistent with the intent of the Development Code. C. "-;hat there has been no significant. changes to the character of the area in which the project is located *:�!%t would cause the project to became nonconforming ,;; inconsistent with current standards. SECTIO°a 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grartis a time e:ctensio —wok: Parcel Map Appl':cA�• Expiration 5786 Crowell Brothers June 13, 1988 S_f.TION 3; Resolutirn No. 84 -50 is hereby modified to add the following cm�ition: 1. Existing overhead utilities: Q. Parcel 1 - An in- l•?:eu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunication an( electricai, excpet for the 66 K. V. electrical) on the project side of Carnelian Street, shall he paid to the City piiior to building permit issuance. The fee shall be the full amount of the City adopted -emit amount times the length of the parcel frontage. TI3 1� b. Parcel,, 2 .- An in -lieu fee as contributio, to--- the future undergrounftg of the exist rig, overhead utilities (telecommuoicat,iort and �'iectrical, excepi�' t,r 66 K.V. electricai)� on the opposite side of Baseline Road and the project side of. Carnelian Street shall be paid prior to recordation of the Map. The fee shall be one -half the City adopted amount the length of the parcel frontage,on ' Baseline Road and the furl iv4lout r of the Ci',7 adopted amount times the length of the parmA frontage on Carnellan Street. APPROVED ANB ADAPTED THIS 10th DAY 0 JUNE,'1987. PLANNING COMMISSI()N OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC.AMONGA BY: Larry T. McNie ,, Chan ATTEST: - Brad u er, e�,.Xy ecre ary�;� '. I, Brad Buller, 'deputy Secretary of the Planning Cemnlission of the City of Rancho Cucaflionga, do herebj certify that the tnragoing Resolution was duly;and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted -ty -the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held o:. the 1C lay of June, 1987, by the following vote,to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ' NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: - COMMISSIONERS: j 1 :E 4: 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT, .T. y c.�IjPdj 0 Q � Z DATE: June 10, 1987 14" TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission ;f FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Bruce•,,00k, Associate Planner SUBJECT: - EYVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWAMIA SPSGIFIC PLAN AAA, - ;Ate n amendment to modify e ,wan a , ec tic- lar"71 -s allows: Figure 5 -18 "Community Trails?,.' by reloca!:ing the Community Equestrian Trail to the south side of 2.4th Street east of the loop Road; Figure 5 -19 "Improved Sidewalks to eliminate, the sidewalk on the south side of 24th Street, east of; the Loop Road; and.Eigure. 5 -35 "24th Street East of Loop` ", to show a 96 foot street "right -of -way with a 20 foot Cowunity Equestrian Trail on the south side parkway. I. BACKGROUND: Fi>L1re 5 -18 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, i.e. ommuni y rails ",';designatere•Community Equestrian Trail on the north side of 24th street, east of the Loop Roan to the 1 -15 right -' of -way. The Trails Advisory Committee, at their meeting of "may 20, 1987, directed that staff prepare ar. amendment to the Etiwanda Specific Plan to mt\dify Figure 5 -18 to show they Community Equestrian Trail on the, „south side of 24th Street. II. ANALYSIS• The ,centerline of 24th Street is the northerly City limit fro m Etiwanda Avenue easterly to the I -15 right-of-way. The Community Equestrian Trail designated for the north side of 24th, Street is for land area not within City jurisdiction. Any requirements foraff cgstett'associated with development would 111 have to be required by San &s rnardino county. A goal of the City's General Plau is the development of a comprehensive and complete trail system. The Trails Committee has determined that to achieve this objective of a complete and comprehensive system, all integral links of the trail system should be located under City jurisdiction and should not be dependent upon other government agencies -for implementation. Therefore, the Trails Committee 'mas recommended that the Etiwanda Specific Plan be modified to designate the Community Trail along 24th Street on the south sd? of the street within City jurisdictiop. I An existing Blue Gum Eucalyptus windrow is located along the south side of 24th Street, and there is an existing Olive Grove windbreak at the intersection. of 24th Street with the Loop Road. The ITEM : j -, PLANNING COMISSION STAFF REPORT C Etiwanda: Specific% Pl,)n Amendme -t 87 -01 - City of Rancho C,tcamonga June 10, 1987 t Page 2 Etiwanda Specific Plan requires that existing �A ndrows located ,., alorg or within public street rights -of -way as specified in Figure 5 -13 be preserve;; and further directs that existing windrows I. located along or within future public streets, but not specified in Figure 5 -13, shall be replevied with new street trees In accordance' with streets cross- sections specified within the Etiwanda Specific Plan (see Section 5.41.202). The Eucalyptus windrow on the south side of 24th Street is not specified for preservation by Figure 5- 13. The Etiwanda SFRIM Plan specifies per ,,Fig 5 -35 Eucalyptus maeulata as the designated street, tree for *eye south side of 24th Street. The existing Blue vin Eu (,alyptus windrow, would be removed and replaced with the EucalyptuF'° raculata wit; "�- 7;ture street improvements for 24th Street. The Olive Grove win&j, ak at the 24th Street /loop intersection is designated for preservation. My future development rf 24th Street in this location, includf.ng Community Trail improvements, would have to be ,done so`-in compliance with ttv-- Sprrific Plan requirement for preservation of the Olive Grove, - - .,.._. .x� The mollification to Figure 5 -18 to de`` gnate i /,e Community Equestri n Trail on the south side of, 24th S�reet wou ?,d necessitate the corollary modifications to Figure 5 -X19,\ "Improved Sidewalks" to eliminate the sidewalk on the . south side 4 24th Street; and to Figure 5 -35, "24th Street;-=eest of Loop " , to `Mow -..a 96 foot street right- of- way.with a 20 foot Community Equestrian Trail on the south si de parkway;; III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS,. Before approving the Specific Plan Amen&,,Pnt, tfid ommiss on must.- _det41MW..Oat the amendment.. will not be detrimental to adjacent'"prbpIrties or cause significant environmental impacts, In addition, tine propaaal must be consistent with the intent of the General Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. _ IV. CORRESPONDENCE: 4140(s.;Wtfic Man Amendment has been advertised as a pu lc easing in The Daily Report newspaper, and „notices were posted at designated p` utr c`— oticin`g locatiols throughout the City. In addition, notices were sent to r11 property owners on whose property the equestrian trails would became designated with incorporation of the proposed trail alignment. PLANNING C- OMiISSION SUPF REPORT Etwanda Specific Plan Amendment 87 -01 - City of Rancho Cucamonga June 10„ 1987 Page 3 41 Ask Y. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends, that the Planning 'Vommission adopt a eso ati;on ,gf Approval rO 'commendins,;to the City Council ` that they appro,'e Etiwanda Specific Plan Atie %dnent 87 -01 through adoption of the attachad resolution,_,and Issuance of a Negative 4 Declaration. A l ly s oer ,n& BB.BG ns Attachments: Exhibit "A" .. Figure 5 -18 Existing Exhibit "B" Figure 5 -18 Amended Exhibit "C" - Figure 5 -19 Existing Exhibi+� "D" Figure 5 -19 Amended Exhibit "E" - Figure 5 -35 Existing Exhibit "F" _ Figure 5 -35 Amended Exhibit "G" - F%are 5 -13 Exhibit "H" - Section 5.41.202 Resolution Recommending Approval with R,ttached Exhibits k p 0,3 o9l K ,1s 7119TIH7E7 i �j - s -� e ir Equestrian Trails mrmn Bike Lary tin Pave i/ neane) Bike Path (16 Parkway) 1 - COMMUNITY 41- TRAILS CITY OF RANCHO C.'CANIONGA TITLE:s o i PLANNING LDIVISM 1(�-7 EXHIBIT:. �` � SCALE= r 11 TM i ice— ---� Equsstrlan Trails 131ke Lane (in Psvua @nt) HIICM Path (in Faraway) i tits figure 42 o r. s y+Ci3McMUNIT TRAILS CITY OF es PL,LNNING DIti`iSiC7tt'3 �/_ EXHIBIT r SCALB� - IMPROVED SIDEWALVS s� One Sider Only Both Side: Hiking / Pedestrian Traiisar.le.. ' title figure PEDESTRIAN TRAILS & 5-1911, i SIDEriIiiALKS CITY OF lTF-'vI- RANCHO CUC14MONGA TITLE. . PLANNING UNISON ���� EXfili rr--_" f4 SCALE:_ 11 il CITY OF RANCHO CUCAN,10,NGA PLANNING DIVISIaN 9 Al, -v IMPROVED SIDEVrkLKS I tinting / Pede3trlan Traft t bw" s*warsmsets) ITENI: TITLE: F-XHIBiT= ! -Z SCALE =. LOOP fttws 24th wd 1-15 FIG. 5-34 cm." OF MPA oiol-ai -d.,.u& 1 .1440 RANUjOcuc�,xiama'A. TITLE: PLANNING DIVEM EXHiBrr.- scALE. O e Loco 8ttwe" 24th and t-15 FIG. 5-3 tvwmnar' P { 1,,j Trott?.Frt,q �y t C rd t f"— N 2 STREET East of Loop wD FIG. 5-35 C'TY OF rrt m: _. '' • of PLANNING DIVISION EXHIMT-.n�SCALE =._._________ 2e! TR l _ �AlVC, �. vrmow..�rvel G t' EXISTING STREET LEES TO BE RRESERV P +� f Existing Windt: oaks l Palm .. Existing Trees EaC tl...Ya /1 �� title figa—re < rr r STREET FREE PRESEAVATIO d i CITY OF ITE:4I RA'��oCH GL''IaNG TITLE: • _.— - PLAINNINC DI- VISION -/8 EXHIBIT. M �6 -,;rAj E. 'IM 54 SPEDIAL:UGULATIONS 5.41 WINDROWS .100 Intent It it the inteat of thin section to most tY.a objectives of Chapter, 3 and to perpetuate a wbxbftek system is Etiwan& throueg Protection of gelww existing maters Bhta Gum Eucalyptus windrows 1A key areas of the community, and through gradod c�tarent and eqm doo of the system through piano` eeew Spo" Gum Buceintus wlr&cwa akesg the estabLvAd 9W pattern. .2PI Existins.'Windrov s .201 Existing windrows located along or withir,ftublic street rights-of-way speclFeal in Figure ;13 shall be preserved. Ir. 0vidual trees or sections a7,'such windrows which are diseased or damarl by fire sija:1 be replaced With 15, gal. si$e Sucaly* 4 ?4 bkoulata (Spotted Gum Tsuee:yptus) to match existing pattern and spacing. .202 imscting windrows located along or within existing or f�jure public streets but not gMdfied in Figure 5 -13 s \U be replaced with rew street trees in accordance wifi, street cross - section i, pi gure 5-20 through V40. .203 Exist a: )ng' oA -ai "'l Winds, �. %not Ioceted along public strec�' may eFihef be preserved or shall be replaced with Eucalyptus Maculita (spottzd Gum) in accordance with Sections .400 and;.F7r b@lDw. .204 All mature existing Wiindrows to be preserved shall require the follo.v�tg coed ;rations: (a) No gradi". ruts or continu°x►s trenching within (b) No 9M within V. Napaving within 71,- (d) Structural setbacks of 25' mhiimum., te) Adequate maintenance end access ,provisions on one side of windrow. M Provisions for deep watering; limit surface watering within 151. CITY OF 1rE�t: R<-4INCHO CUCAXIONGA 3'Ii [ E- PLANNI \G IDIVLSM ��,�� EXH1131T: '" " SCAM RESOLUTION NO.` ` A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO,CUCAMONSA PLANNING COMMISSION: RECOf+04DING APPROVAL OF ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMEt, ' 87-0 -a TO -MODIFY FIGUR�Si ?5 -18; °CO 1UN'ITY= fiRAILS "; FIG > 5 -19., °IMPROVED SIDEWALKS "3 FIGURE 5 -35, 1124TH STREET, EAST OF LOOP". ,. WHEREAS, on the 10th day of Lune, L,V, the Rancho Cucamonga P7 ?':�3ng Commission held a public hearing pursuant tg Section 658G4 of the Cali6rnia Government Code; and WHEREAS, the Cameral Plan and, Etiwanva Specific' -PI en goals are to provide for a comprehens4 ve and comp?ete trails sys�em; and <: WHEREAS, the propo -Side- imenient Ws ll provide -- for an integral f community {.rail l'nk as a part of.the trail sy -atem to be Located within City ,urisdirtion +o implement this goa( of providing a complete and s. pr.- pensive trail system. SECTION 1. The Rancho Cucamonga. Planning C'orrinission has made the following -fU, - nng's; 1. That the surject property is suit%;�Ie for the uses permittcd in the proposed district in terms of access, size, ana compatibility with istijrg land "e in the surrounding area; and 2. That the proposed Specific Plan Amendment ,could not have significant impact on the environment or the sur"cunding properties; and 3. Trot the proposed change is in confermance with the 6ineral Plan and the Etiwanda Sprrific Plan. I SECTION The Rancho Cucai, � - *ga P tinning Commission has found that thi- Projec w1 not create a signifi:.;l adverse impact on the environment and recommnds issuanr,e of a Negative Declaration on June 10, 1987. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved; 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65856 of the California Government Code, that th•; Planning Commission c1 the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval or, the 10th day of June, 1981, of the Etiwanda Specific Plan Amenufiml 87 -01. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 87 -01 as Shown in Exhibits "A" "B ", and "" ;,ttached hereto. I i l pp// %t Resolution No �, (( 1 Etiwanda Spel i63 ia!,1 A6�ndment 87 -01 June 10, 1987 - �u Paye 2 3.. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and`relat6d l ^` material h ^reby. �Aopted by the Planning .Commission ' shall be forwarded to the City Council APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF JUNE -, 19� . PLANNING COWISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAWNGA - r :. BY. � Carry to ,, , a onan ATTEST: ~ ' Brad i l e'r; epv y Secretary I, Brad Bul'or, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Congjssion of the City of Rancho Cucav�anga, do iereby certify that the fbregoiny Resolution eras.dull+ Ord'-' regular',y fAtroduc'ed, passed, and adopted by the - Planning COmissien of the City, echo Cucamonga, at a regular.,mehting of the P13nning Co mission held tr ;a on day of June, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: Al: COMMISSIONERS: p NOES: COMMI °SIGNERS: ~ f� ABSENT: COMhfISSIDNERS: EXHMt Aft JL t 04 t itP \ \tOti P t wy Equesti!,Mrl Traits m Lane (in Pavement) Sikh Path (to parkv.; .-R) etsKxyKwv , !__ il$�33 figuiB t ' C M UNTY "RAILS ka MEN, L 1977 DATE:. J!.ne 10, 1987 T,1: Chairman and Members of thin Planning Commission FROV; Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Chris Westman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND -DEVELOPMENT, REVIEW 87 -10 r propose o construe a wo -s ory ce. an ur ding of 9,000 square feet, in the Neighborhood Corxneryial District located at the `northea t corner of Base Line Ro off ad end Archibald Avenue APN 202- 73148. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Re4uestsd: Approval of site plan, elevat &oils,`art issuance 61--a-legative Declaration., B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: or - par elm'nts, Medium Agh Retidential i14 -24 dulaci South - Commercial, Neighborhood.CowmAercial East Commmerciai, Neighborhood Commercial Wes: - Commercial, Neighborhood Commercial C. General Plan D�e__li_gna�ians: -; rc ect Site - e g"Y or aad Commercial North �Iediu& nig"- ,s dential"(14 -24 du/ac) South - NeigOboAaod Commercial East - Neighborhood Commercial— -West - Neighborhood Commercial E. Site Characteristics: The site is a vacant pad ;-nd there is no sign caf'i annt vegeta£fbn. The pad is part of an Existing commercial shopping Miter. All parking lot and off -site improvenent5 hava been made. F. Parkins Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage. Ratio Re u�ir'd Provided Office /Cwm'l 9,000 1/250 36 36 ITEM L T'. PLANNING COMMISSION..STAFF REPORT PR 87 -10 - Southwest 'Savings June 101 1987 Page 2 s - IA a I } fl. ANALYSIS; A. Background. 'ile building is intended to oe used as offices Bpd anK�.� acs hies whicn ark compatible with the Neighborno,�d Commers "Eal zoning. -,The a�'� nitecture has Dien designed to u;� consistent with the established• design the%Ae of the center;`, Parking lot impreviments were .z.:.L4pl'eted as part of tine overall shopping enter p0oject, B. Design Review Committee: The Committee (Chitiea, McNiei, jr j Coleman) review- e„gr'ojedt on May 21st and the following recommendations were made. Z rne`cix 'oot overhang on the second story shoula be shortened` in carder to reflect that of the jround floor arcade consistent with the design theme and details of the ,)ve;al'1 center. 2. A si'mila~ fascia treatment should be provided to the second story that is found on the ground level arcade fascia. 1 The first floor iiindows should not extend down to the groundd floor, but should begin above a plaster finish Uree foot wail section. t� �. 4. In order to open the plaza to the east side of tht building,, the arcade should provide an. open beam section approximately 5 feet in depth. 5. Low terra cotta pott;3d plantsrs should be provided in the Automatic Teller ,Machine (ATM) area: 6. The parking lot drive aisle configuration, tp, the north should regain as approved under Conditional Use, Pemit 84-13. 7. Ravi sec+ elevations shall be revi, -ewed by ti:e tommi ttee on the Consent Calendar of June 4, 1987 to 'address these concerns. k C. Environmental Assessment: Part I and II of clip Iaitial Study nave seen comp a eu ar.d no significant ;ipacA,s have peen founn- related to the construction of the proposed " nui l dingy}, f ✓�. �; °.'Y 4. _�i...- `i'i+R'_ ^i `, kf K p #� ,: r PLANNTNG C IfISSYZUN`S AFE J2EFOR7 OR 87 -10 - 5ou vtpgs June 16, 1987, Page 3 III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS. The proposed use is corsisteut ith the - genera I Mark a5d Development Code. Thy building design and I% site plan,'tdgether -Frith recommended conditions of approval, are in compssauce 'tipsth' thg Development Code and al other applicable City Standards. IV. REC%494ENDATIt}N Staff recommends that the Flannisg omission approve'' Development Review 87 -10 and issue a " Negative Declaration through adoption of ` the attached Resolution. Resp ful?`i submitted, _qrA .t o Brad B 0 City anner, BB:CW:ns 1' Attachments: Exhibit "A„ - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C` - Elevations x. Exhibit "D" - Landscape Resolution of Approval with Conditions J Standard Conditions Jt Aak _ I i i l i tt NORTH CITY OF RANCHO CUCAI-ivlo ,NGA TITLE: PLANNING DivmoN A } p ►1 s �o' r�r2i ► , . T1 ! "/� 1 '� °� tyu:vdr+di Ion gpr. `5%i' Oct" C NORTH TY OF RA.NLC Ho CUG'"'IO *trt�i Tt7 LE PLANNING e`3IvISiC3�-4 EXHIBIT: SOLE: _ f , -M•w.t u ^a.R .. n yews ► _a,y:a�'cac�.af'si� :v n=v- ' - . Two w 1 �i1I1Mt� its v Iii il#a ■1E X 1 NORTH O""Y OF RANCHO CUC.AINlOi T TITi.E: PLA:NNf, c UTE'LSKOiiN E�ci- E: -IL—_ SCALE. N _ _ fff���. O14• _ �y r� top LQ--- '14 ' zlz' NTH CITY OF {. � C1- }iEr�t. �*�� alt I �-� 0 'L,C 1�1i�NCA T t PLANNING DjVjSj ;V SCALE- Aft a Ll RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION �:,APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. OR 87-10 LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ' ARCHIBALD- AND BASELINE,,,, Itt' THE NEIGHBORHOOD! ERCIAL,PISTRICT - APN 202-731-08. WHEREAS, oR the 10th day of March, 1987, a com lete application was filed by Southwe;it,;Sivinqs for review of the above-descrited pro,�ect; ariki WHEREAS, on the 10th day of June, 1987, the Rancho Cuq;ponga Planning, Commission held a meetinfto consider the above-desnrihed project. follows: NOW THEREFORE, the Rancho Lucaronga Planning Comwission r�461vied as $ECT13N 1: That the following can be met: 1. That the propseO project is consistent' with f; , he objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the pr6posed, use In accord with the objective of the DOvelopmei.�t Code and the purpdkes of *che district in Johich the site 'is located; ani 3. That the proposed use i in compliance with each of the app",icable provisions of the Development Cbde; and 4. That the proposed use, together with the ttonditinns applicable thereto, will not hs detrimental to the public heal4h, safety, or welfare, nr materially Injurious to propertiec or Improipmens -i tne vicinity. SECTIOR 2• That this project will not crate adverse impacts on ti.j envirlinmenT a—no fiat a Negative Declaration is issued on June loth, 1937. SECTION 3: T)-At Development Review No- S7-10 is approved 'subject, to the folldw—in-4—c-o—nUitia6z and attached Standard C%`nditions: 1. Low terra cotta platters shall be prtivided in the Automatic Teller Machine (ATM) area. 2. The parking lot drive aisle configur-tion at the north side of the project-shall remain as approved under Conditional Use Permit 84-13. 3. Exterior building naterials and colzts shall �"tch the existing shopping center. 77 W- Resotution N.�� ^ . Da '37 -M - t&tbwest Savings Jade W, 1987 1i APPROVED AhJ ADOPTED PUS'1OTN DAY 0 JUNE, 1907, PLANNING COMFIIZION OF THE CITY OF RMCHO CUCAMONGA BY: T. W 'M UftalrMart ATTEST: --UFa7 Oul I er. -pu y Secretary I, Braw Buller, Deputy Secretary, of the Planaf ag Cowission of *he .City of Rancho Cucamonga, do h0eby certify that the iforeggfng Resolution was duty and regularly introduced, passed, ihi adopted by the Pi ring Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a replan veeting of ti-.t- 'PEanning Commission held on the 10th day of June, 1987, by the fQTlow.nq vot -to -vita. ,r AYES: COWISSIONERSe NOES: COMMM- 10NERS'. ` 4tsSENT: ca"ISSIWERS ry f � � � e � ° a tr :.Y W Qn �J �C yt. a Ar ba gow "L {0 Gy L VAN tea" L` Y�' O(, `, GDz $N r4L piiV$SS. r C� �C� « tOC9�a y$�. �'= g _ 9. ✓ 4 ta« GC t14 a % e� o:.°."'.'°mcy �`��sCCO: =�j� a�y���•x =av y` * «CC$ y Dp d Dom. '2� 4yGro' V C E +YS GN �1 �� iy0 y« 4r yt ti^7 Cyr � �i14 s p■ ` ¢ Tit pryy � s aroy CiM O"- OO 9ra�Qj wOapN py �'y O�_3 ��or YFiY I. Q4�Siw NCCy�` wCyy"N..L �Y� Xiy >U ++;**pp{ V1.•� pO LK'Y4 ..C`. r0 �N A.1i` M4ai'N jq4 s aD$ Y�O "OyY�Y.. tl y�"Qr "lY� Ar..G.�rb. a q ^ #'�p`qy OY `Yiur�.D ��5- +fig aYnry" PMg dig 1���f w sb�Fi. �,i ^.��,.,,}p� �ti4 � ���,w. s. ■"p p�� Zv «C�K�QV.ps� cp �tga q��s q�.;*q�vai�aiy. b YY a i 3 kt t 41t Ila ZI fitW gtigQ. � emu. d L4w�a, 1` K et N L Y Fww O DO Y ba.C. �! Y ai'Y « ?Y yC4wv r i e i^L v w Q a >, v01 C9 i Py >r_IM •. l d Y Y> 9 a y9 i ` GV 9 L87z FFa> pO� yi L g � C ^ I„ 4yY ``m o aYy� LM•' 6pp.L 6 R. =. G.A •CA O�oz 'p q 2: 5 a7,79 $ Upy'S Y G V IC�pN�N,y�: M` Yu ��L Gy EPI a, C Y yy D^ itV G. C u V a w ■■u4 �' A 7 C° 'dC 61,py N Y C yp 4 yS G T C yl CN M `•O LJ.yd„ 4�O1i PAY Lam. 'LV �Y1 Sp u.CCO N Yaz ' lOa yG��yy C••�U.w �y`..L M4L .'ate L ^ »G1l �0. C.ron. �Njp� 9 V L r C M 2^' ♦ ~ 9 N. C ^= L$ lT® p V V y N a A ,`a S� ya $v. NgFY+a3g G'? M.^N, li au �T P.9w c xL' $�d ^vw L�'Y•,°l$ c.0 ^7W' tV_^. CY QQ •� a M`. N�N9 � wA• 4 ^.Y�„ �^'_,.• g 'z€•8M Hs�no v Li gZZ - «.'N � : 9� ••"giie Z` ar. 0 . 4 S1 EVE za ^yam ,e �4, o Nyb 4a$ Aa."C, �J-7 ap OtPi�� ASC VG rzs 51 G YO 4� tQ =CO j' .N+.' FYl �m 4, vvurCF� VUp V= qi S *. ^`m 4�oq��EmY `k- • �Nu 4Of 9.+ any} > .u3 $r.. ¢ 2 - 5$r a u� S cam$ _L ° °� 'dam y vri�$ aka 3."•°• c =qa ge^ Y L R�.c qr e4n�ww o:a �L. -all 82- 4 6th =, y. � o o6. 4A q� u„Cy y�G•°..p L ^ ]O. a� i �� Y5 S••L`C L44 GpaC Yq4_ E OC mww n daN SM �WH O.T E��= N7y� L� =•^„may ~�1� ^vW a• °NNO,N �OV.�N� iI Y 4 p Y IX �pw L O^ yy6�ti �y CCq <9'6s {yA�rLfr 6 Iw MG ~ Q�viA �+ I D w E �m� L M C 9 Z Z Y . 62 -C ul g y..Lyn�pt ig � N 4 o. uOyuLO eCy e O v�Cb �.°wqR�. 6spe d N .�. 4 12 C 1 4 1` w 0 CL s 4 11 aoa� e° a. a� c,,Y• `o�oa� =u+ L4.o. �u � �. NAYC� t -'y11 q0 =G�dY L.ibL 4y�.' _ ra pr-u.. ��. w v.° 47' ate• -�'W� cui ti...�yv rL U eq N...v n0.0 rJ °Ar Y+ Y YadO Sy �Qj C� N d ��� A JNw Oil �... • _t .^ C NZZ. q.P Gam. d tiQ.'60 C,µ6 �yUA UY N SMa eqi oaa� asK rc '54, AY .G'=q�.��r4 «Yy NYrl^� c.._p.CYt:q. p ^ LY ar� 4y L Y �a.Na Y r0 ate. ^4Lj Mai 6bt�iµt O CYWNi!Q�r L G q µfu .yam. ZI �' TY dI pKN, k OL�'yu W�V1q C � au C¢N'�. ra'6 Z .-TY Y YZi,QN @. L6p. {� a Y {�dY pZd 9Yu Oil 4Cp6g4S 9`` it 3 +$ g a 0 q O s Y l O L tQp c. N -aq i r q u p L.Ga. 0�.4 4 1i i I _- .Y.a M yy .d/ ya1 V Y N q��pOF•'G•� 4• L L` V� Y G1 _O LL CC tl V 3a +.a YYe n y. AEG . z 4ir°�OI L a ., 4affi. $b. Y' 4QI'�y � s ",'. tVU qae .- ^ bG ,. 4�� a. nyb ^a N =A � Y4yL i 4 LJ y •.cr .,. l ��r �' �D�� b .r Y a. z Z z a} 4 6 G u w CO Y6OY 4Ld ..�}} pp A �. yby� Y 4� 4irY. 4�yy°, C a�G.M 4 4� _ ~{I y Y T( .0 V FEY b1. � •U 6PrC � '+0'� b"..•.. QY".� .Q� °4 �t � yqb yO.e at; C.s�CY S. +LrA o � a,r k'O 4c r.r OY 9Y cC L G4 q A pr T. T C' + 'a y 6 V N N Q Y 4..— Y M ut G' c dWp 8 Vgal a {� `2 9�0. y yyY [A L O y Z C_ S u�yy° K so LNC 6;�tn } KON rqN 4V i9 G� OG Cy Y f^`e N...s ,IF; Ei. e} tKp+� C. W40. «yla0 r I Q Z V ELI `7 d L .N)1 qy1 >, � ,• crbC r YO OF UC 4C= Ey ^lam YN_Ar. 6YG C OC yyggY E�AJ. �40.OL �{ � _� ��SYC CD~ LY 0=H- G 6 fG��aN3C�r~NIYi )r C LN 4y-.pV a ' V q � RAI F -�._i Aa Y R O 'Q A� ypi y3Y= ` i''s GyJ V COY �`35d� 6N - �'� S �m $' r CN u - y ,L', u -Y 3� CpG OYY 5M =w8 9M..� q 9v 4l jro F M M O C 9p - �y aryt GL eN1 WYN 6$Y ZYp COp�,N VM -SJ, C �v �6Vy, Yl..3.2 -.as w.N A 2; -4 Lpi L L" • �r��yNi q {L J m Z r'.. + OpE 1, VYQ4_ 3 aL8 w. Y'1:.�Syyy Z: wP wyW �qC VwO CH� V.s���0 �Oy �.. •G�yy ■ LY wCG �i~.V�.�. G�.M n'� � GV y �.�p� ■a Y j q C. s OL�O Y }iir.A. �i _��4 ■C�u a � q u L CC QLL Ol F �pyr_r y r LV� � N Y � � N roy nt O S. 0�E � ,L�� ... ,�G�A . r � q4YAOy 9y'=I ✓M „ pC a L NdY, s �. jill� • r>YYL M µiu��l!! , C i � Z d H ~ VwOS f vY W_- .'q. vuia: P •' `s dlGy}V ii5 t ��g A�. �py�Y ^psYAlt iaCS?iV L cusp y 1 V uiN15. C p. O N 9 CC6 Yiipp r Rau `` � 1: syys ► ylii yQry L,����yyyi• i. MC V Y~Ui 1yq {� 3 vz C � b r 4 a 6. 9 G +?L p t »' 0 7Z w' +'G+ T- is; 4 ur3 4 0 N H Y y a y C t..Or)4 Nr C V'jro c�i to M..O Aw gr'L >ti a�= a O � y : Y 6' � V + p Y = = .n 0 p x O w� Y w Y tl O yY O'S ., �G 7 V ro `r pl wgu PI �sC N NaL aatc y4.r�i l ail g.aLE y� 5M O V 4l jro 4y.T GM� C� r�C E.2 + CI g i wC. IL p Yg. o Cx> w,}yy'.. CO6 O �. y �.�p� ■a Y j q C. s OL�O Y L if . �` C+sOC ♦ i el C L G� � N Y � � N ` M Y i O `2 C Y� r .�.d •O M � N Yip O �aq C�r s .51 v a QQ�a. TLOV o O. Y■hO Aro GD` ti- wV4 NY Q�V .-Sl S qqY aY Ys gage L Mr. L N O7YY p�b l.+iOr +?L p t »' 0 7Z w' +'G+ T- is; 4 ur3 4 0 N H Y y a y C t..Or)4 Nr C V'jro c�i to M..O Aw s G AYYp .. qT� QC E�yr• 3 t� NL V�1r �� SrtV M -ji UV C. V'� Z3 Mq -w y.` ^. YY tl C rp.-s L .°ya r �r■Y a� cs �. N UY Y -q .CLO NOV 7 GC. GG- rwnu� G w0s 6V�� Y N ti ,,I i' , 6A 10 14 K, s V6 z"I t wt I&A ASS az Vj Ott PS A. 163- - Toll I i 15AIll I S-alT S S a ..-,& nul '613 a 'S 0 T6 _%91-5 It Wa I A s i �tk Ila fts & %S t tit-; OSS 9 vs ITS i rs S S I I k It Q . V .w O G. 221 i? NpC� a �' Z Y M wr VlN �Y u .� N W'w MVOSC � YC }� X =. Gq L CD�rrq O 9 r- �' v ■per YL irYM � •b V � r • uey`�Z Ow Yt. �p ysRp C p i i q r N 1T r' • • S CO n y� LVg9 Xr� rd �� { YTt.qp d OC O ``q C49 ygg9 .gCG 43 '� CCN -� a s ry�a. S GN QN N tGI� io spi54° $44°'�L�,GOC g Ca L a r` V 9 i iv ~ Y V too WY LtO N GW �nC. YC 41.C4 U _ C S •O ay�. Cy 6 �b� O r 1 a �tw�� `w $� �0� �f�yY �i �y YO •O.�t 1. a y 6�q OVw.9 A .9 z 221 i? Y.R Naomi 4.0 Z Y 4 \3 dv1 w fi.a Y u .� N W'w w b � « BY. Err. b eC7i� v ��Mi irYM � V � r • uey`�Z Ow Yt. �p ysRp k++w KsN r f It! `y y�, • S it a.'. - Xr� rd G; -Z'z. { O ``q N Z9 uu ia0 EE lz �44 O g + $44°'�L�,GOC ta Ca L M �W r` V 9 i iv ~ Y V P KY C WY LtO N GW �nC. YC 41.C4 U 221 i? Y.R Naomi 4.0 Z Y 4 \3 dv1 w fi.a N -Al au .� N C _� i N w b r D C O +L yyy K Err. I eC7i� v ��Mi a R y�iK O i • �yyY w y uey`�Z Ow Yt. �p ysRp k++w KsN r f 221 i? Y.R Naomi 4.0 Z Y [ a: E N -Al au _ of yyy K eC7i� �N ��Mi `Q e R i el app Y �p ice? �0 °`i0 a.'. - bu G; -Z'z. { O ``q ib O' finc �.RV Ya g + $44°'�L�,GOC Ca L M �W r` V 9 i iv V ~�w L G Mti N GW �nC. YC 41.C4 a_� e r y Y 'oE ai a 4 M� V Y e �5 CL vL Y� a� 0 t L� �a y Q i QQppppu K +gip V m �: p u Un'fig. Y` -3 -2 DESW az w `Yoayy+ o-�.Y'Y'O s 3`Y `YdY �„„�i�o NVV` Y Or a. ��y f_ V� f « + yG� p py ¢ V O QlQ� Y W 4 � V 4• O 6 P a a� ~ V e� �` q Y�Y L 6� Y G`� CC u N V y �r _Y .: S O �pyY L�SVO b3 iJ �I�A •M. t px� �' C� pY.a jG RS4L �Lt� �0., ep y�� �Cp. C N� G� 9�1Yj� �LN °rh. ■n 9`° V �� 4YM eoN.pMVC CCC+ �y� fYsp~�N� Yye 9N OCR M= �QIL N y. CITY OF RA tCHO CUCAMQTGA �ucAnro �• � i �7 tY c-p Z Date: uur_e 10 39$7 -- —> r 1977 To, Chairman and Members Pla2lni r W, "x:11 nc� ommission From: Peter J. Pitassi, Chairman Park Development Commission Subject: Central Park Master Plan Design The Park Development Commission at its regular meeting of May 21, reviewed the Central Park Master Plan Design concept and forwarded same to the City Council with a unanimous Commission recommendation for approval and adoption. The Park Development Commission requests that the Planning Commission also review the- Master Plan and forward any c,,mments you may have to City Council to aid them in their review consideration. i Thank you. _ P,TP:bs l ITUI fit N Date: Tot. From: Subject: CITY OF WiNCHQ CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM June 10, 1987 Planning Commission l Bill Holley, Community Services Director Central Park Master Plan Design Requested Ac-It o : The Park Development Commission on May 21, reviewed that Master Plan for Central Pare and forwarded to the City Coi,mcil its unanimous recommendation for approval. It is recluestsd than the Plarming Comm 4sion review the concept being forwarded to City Coto; and provide additional recommendations or any comments',. : -h you may feel appropriate for Council consideration. Background: Central Park is 103.5 gross acres located in the geographic beiart of Rancho Cucamonga at the northwest corne- of the intti.�M *-tion of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue. It is bounder on the north by the to be abandoned Southern Pacific Railroad right- oiyway and to the west by the Deer Creek Flood Control Channel. Central Park is being purchased in ten acre increments from the Lewis Development Company, with the last Marcel release sc'aeduled in 1994. High community interest in the development of Central Park became apparent in 1985 and 1986 when Inquires by commercial, interests, civic organization and community groups began" surfacing requesting allocations of portions of the site for particular uses. The City Conncil, upon the recommendation of the Park Development Commission, directed in late 1986, the undertaking of full master plan development of the site in an effort to insure that central Park was designed as a total concept and to prevent a piecemeal design /development approach to what is to be the cornerstone of Rancho Cucamonga's park system. Morse Consulting 7roue of Irvine California, was selected after an extensive process, as the coordinators of the design• program, with Robert J. Mueting, Architect and Landscar Architect, named as Project Director. Central Park Master Plan Design June 10, 1987 Page two The Central Park design program was to center on a community based design task force, as is the City's custom, made up by a diverse cross section of cownunity representation the membership included: Jim Bailey Denise Garland Ron Wshop Margie Goldstein Andrea Blair norm Guith Bob Zradley Becky Hardy Steve Butters John Melcher Joe Dilario Sandie Oarly Bob Dutton Diane Williams ,Tim Frost Linda YotvAt -Additionally, for interpretive and technical supljo!rt the presence of the following resources were available to the task force: City Of 'Rancho Cucamonga - Community Services Department City of Rancho Cucamonga - Encjineeritq Division (Sj�affic and Public Works) City of Rancho Cucamonga - Planning Division Morse Consulting Group Lastly, the program was monitored throughout its dpmrelqp�aent by Park Development Commission chairman peta pitassi and Commissioner San Punter. The task force met on four Occasions between February 16 and M,-y 11, for the purprse of establishing goals and priorities for Central Park and to perform revisions and refinement to various directed design concepts. ��PlanGve Qme tj Capsulating the work of the task force into several paragraphs is not indicative of all the thought, point - counterpoint, weighing of issues, and interchange of ideas that was present throughout the workshop proc:ram. Each and every member contributed and no one member or interest dominated. It was among the best community design process I have observed. Initially, d--scussion of the task force centered on, in essence, making Central Park a b�-' 1-y active, intensely developed site with discussion of "'Et'adiums, softball and soccer field complexes; a community center; a library; swim facilities; tennis center; gymnasium; childrens theater and open space. M-3 �' Central. Park Master Plan resign �� f June 10, 1987 Page three 111 1I As the work of reviewing the options and ,nitt plan alternatives by the task force continued,: ;Lt beo .e >lear that consensus of the group vas shifting froxu one o, i,'tensc� develornent throughout the site to one which achAOV44 4 more balanced approach which preserved a very significant-, opera space element. The feeling of the task force reflected the opening oozzents ,)f 'Mayor Dennis Stout when hie gave the groin their initial. charger "This is the most important park in the city. This park will draw :peopl,`; from all over the city, an-' should be designed with this in mind. This park should have features of desicm unique to this Particular park. Reep in mind, Rancho Cucamonga is a special place i where our people expect the very bast. So give it your time and attention. T know we will be proud of what ever you do." The task force did not want Central Bark dust a largar version of our three community parks, Hei=itage, Red H'll and the future Etiwanda Park, but something 'unique,_ something that would be 'different' from everything else that the City has done or will ever again have the opportunity to do. What has been forwarded to the City Council by the Bark Development Commission with a recommendation for approval,` represents, in their opinion, such a plan. Tae Plan; The proposed Master Plan for Central Park can be generalized to contain three major elements, each with sicnificant and distinct features. o The omniCenter: Locate,l on the corner of Base Line Road and Milliken, this major element contains five separate but integrated features, • Library • Community Center • Childrens Theater/Lecture Hall,/Auditorium • Fine Arts /Display/'Museum • Plaza �' Central Park Master Plan. Design June 10, 1987 Page Four o The Park: Located on a diagonalr encompasses the heart of, the site from southWest corrsr ,to north east corner and contains: 4 Lake and Pater Features o Lakeside Concert Pavilion o Four Playgrounds o Two Group Picnic Areas and Individual Picnic Areas - o A `boretum o Maintenance Facilities 0 The Spot -;3 Center: LOCate3+at the north west corner Of the park, this element contains: o C�ymnasium /Recreation Center o swim raeil.ities o Tennis Facilities ET would refer you to the Master Plai at this point for M details of design, locations, and relationships, t Touching briefly upon the infrastructure, the plan calls for I three signalized entry /exit points and an internal loop road for circulation. These have all been coordinated with city Engineering.. Parking standards have been coordinated with City Planning to ensure adequacy and compliance to the Development Code. Staff Co-' ,ants: From our perspective, the task force is to bebe commEided for looking well beyond simply the issues of moment and reaching out and into the future.... that is what good planning is all about. The plan is good. If you have any questions or comments on issues regarding Central Park on or before June 10, please do not hesitate to dive me a call. Thank you. BH:ks • �-5 r" ` Ic K] �� rr ---- f,;IT'Y fir- RANCHO CUCAMONGA &TAFF REPORT RO 2U x Uy U. DATE: June 10, 1987 TO: Chairman and Members of the, Planning Commission FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: RESULTS OF APRIL 29, 1987 UL" LITY UNDERGRA LADING WORKSHOP BACKGROUND: The purpose of this report is to finalize a response to the items discus se at the April 29, 1987 workshop to be forwarded to the City Council for consideration in the adoption of a Council utility :indergrounding policy. SUMMARY: A brief listing of the items discussed and the action of tie Commission are as follows: ITEM ACTION A. Changes to current polity: 1. Change minimum length for unddrgrounding from 3001 to 601. Approved & Grant special consideration for corner parcels. Disapproved 3. Continue to require undergrounding of Railroad Utilities. Approved B. Recommend to Council that the City provide funding for a project to underground the total length of railroad utilities at one time. Approved C. Complete a comprehensive inventory of utilities if the items in D below are to be given further consideration. Approved D. A City wide assessment district and development fees should be considered as a means of funding undergrounding throughout the City. Approved E. Both the Chamber and the Commission feel that the undergrounding of existing overhead utilities will provide a long term economic benefit to the City. N/A ITEM N id" Planning Staff Report "y Utility Undergrounding Workt'D June 10, 1987 i � Page 2 DISCUSSION: The only item decided at the workshop that would effect the currept policy is increasing the minimum length for undergrounding from the current 'olio is 6041. To effect this change, Section i.b. of the policy resolution would have to be changed accordingly and should be done prior to submittal to the City Council. However, at the direction > of the Mayor, staff i.� providing the following anal!7sis for your consideration prior to final adoption of the modification. A review of the projects approved by the Planning Commission witn utilities on their side of the street for the period from November 27, 1985 to August 27, 1986 (9 months) revealed the following when grouped according to the length of jt their frontages: Based upon the above, it is concluded that the proposed modification would result in a further reduction from 6 to 29% in the length of lines being undergrounded immediately, however fees would be collected for future undergrounding. This should be balanced against the reasons for the MI minimum length provided by the utility representatives , which included: 1. Cost savings, 2. ease of maintenance, 3. less interruptions to customers, and 4. t4�! shorter distance may add unsightly poles and guy wires. If the Commission should decide to revise the Policy Resolution to reflect the 3001 to 600, change, staff requests the additional changes as shown on the proposed Resolution (Exhibit "A"), Additions are shown in bold print. An explanation of the changes is as follows: 40 1 Grouped by Length 41 to 300' 300' to 6001 600 Total No. of Projects 6 14 17 37 % of Pro. -cts 16 38 46 100 Aggregate Length 1,314 5,156 16,278 22,748 % of Length 6 23 71 100 Based upon the above, it is concluded that the proposed modification would result in a further reduction from 6 to 29% in the length of lines being undergrounded immediately, however fees would be collected for future undergrounding. This should be balanced against the reasons for the MI minimum length provided by the utility representatives , which included: 1. Cost savings, 2. ease of maintenance, 3. less interruptions to customers, and 4. t4�! shorter distance may add unsightly poles and guy wires. If the Commission should decide to revise the Policy Resolution to reflect the 3001 to 600, change, staff requests the additional changes as shown on the proposed Resolution (Exhibit "A"), Additions are shown in bold print. An explanation of the changes is as follows: 40 1 Planning Staff Report Utility Undergrounding Workshop June 14, 1987 Nw Page 3 1. First whereas clause: This clause states that the previous resolution is being replaced. 2. Therefore clause, line 2: Add reference to the exempt project list to be added as Section 7. 3. Therefore clause, line 5: Add a reference to lines within the project, which bps occurred on or,,:ation. 4, Section l.b., line,3: Chenge 300+ to 600" if so decided. 5. Section 5. Replace the entire section to read more !i clearly, There,.lave been questions as to its intent with i the current wording;.' 6. Add a new Section 7 crntaining the exempt project list. For your rdierenp,e, the current Resolution and exempt project list are ` contained on Exhibits "B ";& "C" respectively. RECEiI+iMEfiiiii T101 r'f Staff reco=ands that the Commission review the information provided, t decide on the proposed modifications to the policy resolution. and direct staff to stabmit a report to the City Council reflecting the items contained in this report and any others provided by the Commission. I i, Respectfully submitted, 1 Barrye R. Hanson! Senicr Civil Engineer BRH.,dlw Attachments: Proposed Resolutiont (Exhibit "A ") Current Resolution (Exhibit "B ") 1 Exempt Project List (Exhibit "C") RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING A REVISED POLICY FOR THE .LJNDERGROUN DING OF' EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 86 -77 VHEREAS, the Planning Con.ission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga wishes tai repeal Resolution No. 86 -77 which was adopted on the 28th day of Kay, 11186 and establish i:Nx revised policy contained herein; WHEREAS, the %,anning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga wishes to remove unsigk ";T,y existing overhead utility lines in order to promote a more aesthetic and dzsirable working and living environment within +',I)e City; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to establish a policy to inform property owners and developers of the City goal. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved and established that all develdpments, except those contained in Section 7 and any others specifica:ly waived by the Planning Commission, shall be responsible for undergrounding all existing overhead utility lines including the removal of the related supporting poles adjacent to and within the limits of a development as follows: 1. Lines on the project side of the street*: a. Said lines shall be undergrounded at the developers expense. b. In those circumstances where the Manning Commission decides that undergrounding is impractical at present for such reasons as 'a short length of undergrounding (less than 600 feet and not endergrounded adjacent), a heavy concentration ;of services to other users, disruption to existing improvements, otc., the Developer shall pay an in -lieu fee for the full amount per Section 6. c. The Developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of one -half the cost of undergrounding from future develipments as they occur or, the opposite side of the street. 2. Lines on the opposite side of the street from the project: The Developer s a pay a fee to the City for one - a t;a amount per action 6. 3. Lines on both sides of the street: The Developer shall comply with Section I above and be eligible or —reimbursement or pay additional yeas so that he bears a total expense equivalent to one -half the total cost of undergrounding the lines on both sides of the street. 4. Pole lines containing 6KV or larger electrical lines: tell lines shall be un ergrourt a or in- ieu fees paid in accordance witl'i section 1, 2 or 3, above, except for 66 KV or larger electrical lines s Fx�t�r'` �cA r, tad ® l & -PZ k 4 S. Limits of Responsibilities: v AWL a. In-lieu fees shall be based upon the length of the property being u developed from property line to property line (the center of adjacent streets for corner properties). b. Undergrounding shall include the entire project frontage and extend to: (1) the first existing pole off- -site from the prajgct boundaries (across the street for corner properties), (2) a ne* -ale erected at a project boundary (across the street for corner properties)', or (3) an existing pole within 5 feet of a project boundary, except at a corner. 6. F:,e Amount: The Munt for in -1 ieu ' fees shall equal the length (per S egscon .a )''times the unit amount as established by the City Lurscil base: upon information supplied by the utility companies and as updated periOically as deemed necessary. 7. Exln.qi ons: The following types of projects shall be exeept free thi;c Policy; i k a.' •The addition of fuwfttonal equipment to existing developments, swch 1 a.I: loo<ling do;ks, silos, satellite dishes, anteixla , water tanks, air conditioners, 4boling towers, Enclosure of an udt�.W storage area, parking and loading areas, block walls and fences, e !;. b. Building additions or new free standing buit.lings of letb "than 25% of l the floor area of the existing building(s) on the same assessor's j parcel, 4)r 5,000 squat feet, whichever is less. c. ,.Exterior upgrading or repair of existing deve %pments, such as: rEroofing, addition of trellis, awnings, landscaping, equipment screming. repzxir � tis 4 and exterior finishes, etc. d. interior tennant improvements and non- construction CUPS. e. The construction of a single family residence on an existing parcel. f. Existing overhead utility lines located in trails, alleys, and utility easements with a heavy concentration of services to adjacent developomV' ind the utility lines are 5D0' or more from the right of way line of a Special Boulevard. g. Residential subdivisions of four or fewer single family residential parcels, where the utility lines extend at yeast 600° offsite from both the Project boundaries and the adjacent property is not Likely to contribute to future undergrounding. * All references to streets shall also mean alleys, railroad or channel rights - -or -way, etc. M-5 RESOLUTION NO. 86 -77 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CI'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING A POLICY FOR THE UNOERGROUNOING OF EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES.' WHEREAS,., the Planning Commission of t';4e City Qf Rancho Cucamonga wishes to remove 0 _jightiy existing overhead utilify,lines in OM!z to orwote a more aesthetic :an {q desirable working and living eitlironment within the City, and WHERVS, it' -is necessary to establish a policy to inform property owners and develapers of the City goal. NOW ;'\ THEREFORE, be it resolved and established that all developments, unless specf,ficaliy waived by the Planning Comission, shall be responsible for undergroLnding all existing overhead utility lines including the removal of the related supporting poles - :adjacent to the limits of a. development as follows: 1. Lines : -in th^ groject side of the'street*: a. Said lines shall be undergrounded at the deveinper's expense. b. In those circurmstances where the PlanningfjComvis5ion decides that undergrounding is impractical at present for such reasons as a short length of undergrounding (less than 300 feet and not undergrounded adjacent), a heavy conceptration of services to other users, disruption to existing improvements, etc., the Developer shall pay an in-lieu fee for the full amount per Section 6. c. The 0ev63per shall be eligible for reimbur-nt of one- half the cost of undergrounding from future developments as they occur on the opposite side of :he street. 2. ttnes-on the OPPOsits side of the street from tho.project: The sve oper IS TAR I I Pay a ee e. v or one - a� Ife amount Per Section 6. - 3. Lines on both sides of the street: Th* Developer shall comply on abdve_aAd_75e_eTT9Mle for reimbursement or pay additional fees so that he bears a total expense equivalent to one -half the total cost of undergrounding the lines on both sides of the street. 4. Pole lines containing 66KY or lar er electrical lines: All noes s a e un ergroun a or in-lieu tees paid-75 accordance with Sections 1, 2 or 3, above, except for 66 KV or larger electrical lines. �b 0 s� ya•, 1 5. Limits of Responsibilities- a. In -lieu fees: ? `. he fee shall be ba4dd upon the length of the property being drve]oped from property .line ..to property line or the center of adjacent streets (allay, railroad or channel right -or -way, 'etc.) for corner properties... ` b. Undergounding: Undergrounding shalt extend to: (1) the first existing pole off -site ;from the project boundaries, (2) a new pole erected at a project boundary or across the street (alley, railroad, or channel right- of-way, etc.) for corner properties, or (3) an existing pole wfthin 5 feet of a project boundary (not at a corner). 6. Fee tvwuata The amount for in -lieu fees shall equal the lengt;.h, T(l1"r_'S" XT*n 5.a) times the unit amount as established by the City Council based upon information supplied by, the utility companies and as updated periodically as deemed necessary. * All references to streets shall also mean alleys, railroad or channel rights -of -way, etc. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF MAY, 19 ". PLAFi ISSIOF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAI►3ONi;A BY: 71 A ATTEST: 1. Brad Boiler, Rancho Gurag Deputy Secretary of the Planning. Comission of the City of onga, do hereby-certify that the foregoing Resolution was duty and regularly iritrochreed, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho ;Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning *OMMission held on the 28th day of May 1586, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, CHITIEK, BARKER, REMPEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: STOAT • 12!10186 4d EXISTING 'OyERFN:Aa U Uln RMzg@MTS ExoWt,ftOJ ,t List E 1. The addition of functional equipment to existing developments, such asc loading cioc6eS, silos, satellite 'dishes, antennds, water tanks, air conditioner cociiAg towers, enclOsure of an outdoor storage area, parking ana loading areas., block walls and fences, etc, 2. 801d n, additions Or new free standing e buildings of 7Atss thh dn' bx of t "floor area of the existing buildin.g(s) on the saw assessecar S� square _feet, whichever is lass. parcel, s» Exterior upgrading or rep4ir of existing devel�tnts, Such as; reroofing, addition of trellis, awnings, landscaping;, screening, equipment repainting and exterior finishes, etc. 4. Interior gust i!rrovemnts � -` S. Non - construction CUPS. C- The construction of -j Single frmily residence on an existing r .T,�= -' g pare 7. Existing overhead utility (ink located in trails, alleys, and utility easements with a '*.ivy co`ncantration of developments, and the utility lines are SWI or more firm the right of way line Of a Special Wava*'d. S. Residential suNivision3 01' faur or fewer single family residential parcels, where the utility lines erti dL at least 600° offsite from both the project boundaries and the adjacd'nt property is ,;tint likely to contribute to future undergrounding. i i E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGr MEM'O'RANDA � � DATE. June 10, 1987 s� TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission i • _ SUBJECT: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS B \-)NGfiT Attached under separate cover. ' IXZ, 1 4 0 IA 11�� I R NOTICE 3F,-ADJOURNMENT OF BU6GET'`WORKSHOP MEETING �• Notice is hereby given: that the Rancho Cucamonga City Council and f F` Redevelnpnent Agency at their Tuesday, June 9th, Budget Workshop, adjourned said meeting to Monday, June 15th, at the hour of 8:61, p.m. at 1. -he Lions Park Community Center, Ga %lat %y West Room, 9161 Base Line Road., Said Continuance was passed by the fallowing vote: AYES: Brown, Buquet, Stout, King NOES: None ABSENT: Wright' (� �- Date Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk y R b