The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1987/07/08 - Agenda Packet 7 ` 5 87 � 1 , O C'CA. �+ n AGFNDA b �j 1977 j WEDNESDAY, JULY 8,1987 1¢00 P.M. a IJONS PAIR, i t�7R 9161 BASE Luit $A1TChui C:i3OA�iiOPFtiA„=�157LE1�8)I�IA LION RGENDA ;,,, L Pk**of mhastwce �t IL Roll C1 1, Comz l*s,ner B>akealey X Commissioner Emerick x Commissioner Chities, k Commissioner McNiel x C' Commissioner Tolstoy x IIL Amouncements YV. 6 ore t Cale�r •MS A & 8 RFSiOVED ....- , sn DISCUSSION, The following Cori�ott Calendar items am expected to be r routine and nori-controversial. They will be acted on bj the, Commission at erne time without dfuussiom"If anyana has concern over any item,it should be removed for discussion. APPROVED 5-0. ADD RESs?LUTION OFAF1'ROVAL FOR l41IlV'Ok. C KnITI�N THAT LADDFR SHALL LiWMNT EY. Hi 8s-2�i, MO .-A request to BE REMOVED NNEN THE SKATE- ellaW a skatebftrd ramp M the rear yard area of a single BOARD RAMP IS NOT IN USEr_ family located at 10007 Manzanita Drive-APN 201-89i IL (ContintAd from June 24,1987). APPROVED 5-0. S. 131dM014MENTAL ASSESSMW,,T FOR DEVELOPMENT P ZA DETAILS AND COLOR 8 -2Z- 4 GE Ap 1t a P NEI85-The SAMPLES `0 BE RETURNED.- TO DESIGIi REVIEW. ssluare ¢eel on 12.6 acres of land within the General _ Iadustrisl giatriet(Subarea 14),lozated as the east side of Santa Anita Avenue approidmatelg,1,800 feet north of Ott# Street-AtPN 229-321-14,25,16. APPROVED 5-0. t ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR- DEVELOPMENT / W 8' - RT R aL fRESIGIi - he FBI� velopMent of a 11777.,seuare oot to us3- S ehouse bUlding on 10.8 gems of. Wa in the_,Minimum Impact Heavy Imiustrial District (Subama 9), located at the southwest corner of Jersey Boulevard and Vincent Avenue-- AP'N 20Ei•.:43-134nd 11. E � as x� �;�,. � , •��• " � , ��„ + ' s V. pt c geexi¢p € The faItosaw items are puwc hearings in which concerned ircdivlduaia, tlaay vafce their opanion ct the related project. a Piea4a tg►.beao9►!izeefi Icy the Cafrrgt ;d asidress ttat: Comma scan , statirsg iur namc� �jid sddows. All such opinians:stiatI a'Iimitdd to 5 fiinutes per Yr�ctivir3uat fqr each project. € APPROVED-5-0 WITH MifDIFICATIQND NVAR0X,NSN &t�_ ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE LR S WITHIN THE PROJECT T �A 1' 23'362- P D vE PAE The .SHALL gE COORDINATED FOR dev ,upment a s 14 lat,subc3i� dn;on 6:8?.:acres of Iand ir► C(3eVSISTE1dCY. the Flow Itesl '�tiat District (2-4•dwelling units lacate+I.wrest y tlrlt intereeetion of llmeth at Street and Higts�ar A -APN 20I 711=0I ,02, 03. The-, l-cant P has alas tiled t.�'1'ree Removal Part it. Related i 87- 03. .APPROVED 5-0.. E. VARIANCE 67-03 PgNidHILL D1 V43LOPME•NT - A request.to reduce the ifiitu-r—a—P caner s. a yard:setbaek from 27 feet to 23 feet on a eiisti 2&5,000'squar01:110ot lot in the Low Residential District (: 4 dwelling units per acre),located rest"of the intersection Y1 Amethyst Strait ark Highland Avenue-APN 201 711-03. Related bile IT 13367. APPROVED 5-0. F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND _gONDITIONAL ME—P 8 -23 PA I. 8GE' II� ..-A request its Gist!:blis arch within an a !ng malti-tenant industrial wvm&x in the General Indust,€ial District(Subarea 11); located at the, northeast corner of &th Street and Utica Avenu:,-APN 209-411-17. APPROVED 5-0 WITH MODIFICATIO • T3?7?►3RONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL THE PA"fIENT PICKUP SE l 87-1?-BA I4 C l3i'RUANT I:HEALTH AREA DESIGid SHALL BE R TCOZilEi4 ' GOVOLOPMent of a 5 budding me ijaj_off s A complex TO STAFF AND 4ESIGN RFYIVs totaling 197,000 square feet, with Phase I being a 3-story 50.00 square foot medical office and ambt� Atom _ cara center on # acres of land in the Industrial lark t�trict (Subars& 7), bested at the southwest aide of Eucalyptus Street and lied Oak Street - APN 205-35i-25. Related Fdes PM 10696 and DR 87-25. i r M 'APPROVED 5-0. , L. EN' 4I . MEAI, A#SS13SSREN-t AND PARCEL, MAP :, 1Q89fi - BAR, � DE��L P E3MPA stUt v o 3 r acres a into 3 psree in the 1 x Indus$; al Psrl.-Deve�apnlentiPistriet5`ubarea 7,bounded b v Whits2,Oak,Avenue Feed Oil I'-treat and.Civic Center Drive -Arid 208-351-28, 1k 26. Belated Files CUP 87,-17.and DER 87-25. PROVED 5-0. I. RNVIROX-MENTAL ASSEM ,VENT AND TENTATIVE Ii :W , total rdsY ontial bveloprpOnt of 6 ghtten 1_78 wngie family lots-five(5) 4 .ry acres of land in the Low' Density Residential District(2-4 dwelling units per acre),Iocated at the so itheast corner of Rermosa Avenue and Manzanita Ddie-A, T 201-181 28. APPROVED 3-2. J. CQNDYTIONA , USE PERbUT 80-24 MODIFYCATYCrN y Ci'ITIEA - NO PLA NNrT INZ,G O f. -A request to in y a co on a fiCNIEL- - NO approval requiring the und' grounding of existing overhead utilities along 8th street f- a proposed.convenience sales and service center at the northeast corner of Vineyard r Avenue 840,80 Street-APN 201-013-15. AWED 5-0. K. ENVIRONIdENTAL ASSESSMENT ANl) PARCEL MAP 1771-THED E C K COMPANY--A subdimsion>of 70.15 acres of land into 2 parcels in the Low(2-4 dwelliag t. units per acre)Residential District located between Wilson c Avenue and Banyan Street,West of the Deer Creek,;Channel i -APN 201-191-17. PLANNING C"ISVARIANCE APPROVED L, YAIUANCE 87-05-SARKW'SIAN'-A request to reditce the- TQ DENY VARIANCE 3-2. Darking and-average i pIng setback required along ACTION RECONSIr2RED. PLANNING . Irr�sw POute, per a proposed development of a new PREVCOMMIOUS A TIONVOTE TO DENT THEIR neig1borhood commercial center in the General PREVIOUS ACTION (4-1). Commercita District located at the southwest corner of CC-TINUE VARIANCE AND REQUEST Barrow Route and Malven Ac.`nue AEON 209-041-49, 50.FOK ONE MONTH TO,AUGUST 127K.. Rued FP,Id''P 87-07. APPROVED 4-1 APPROVED 4-1 M. SIQVIR0rAMENTA1A tMESSMENT .sXD CONDITIONAL NUED CONDITIONAL USE UNE PERMIT 87-07 -SAR TA -A proposal to nAvrlop PERMIT REQUEST TO AUGUST 12TH. a 1 ,000 square Dot rat including a 2,Pao s iwre foot restaurant on 1.26 acres of hand in 'tf f General Commercial District located at the southwest'^orner of Malven Avenue and Arrow Route - APN •209-041-49,°'" Related File VA 87-05. { , afi 'APPROVED 5-0 AS MODIFIED. ,. ENtIIRON 1Mt?L.;• ,ASSE$S_MSW, ANDTENTAXIVE ' G0N TIOW 15, 8f, & . ' s13Q6 - A t6ta res)rientsal RIMETER LANDSCAPING TO BE aeyel pie T- e e �y Y o�c 32 6 sores a"f 7ea►d itEVI EWED BY STAFF. t J,o ,3 t 'mac at a� istr;a (2- der 'ttg� peg etee � ri ` � ' esi la S `e ct�isn Io& on the east.siaes o" asC i e ue�at Ca al S reat -APN J7� 7, snit;20 Msoeiated wit the proposal is Tree Removal. ,Permit. .81 44 -� A request to remove 70 _ $uca'!~yptua,g�tobules;(^�Itie�Gatcn}trees. APPROVED 5-0. Q, AND . TEN7,.�TIVE SI`ER 4.VISTA TO BE REDESIGNED 1'S91 -fie Tpm A a 12 lot IN A CURVILINEAR FASHION. THE custom SUM fan on 4.i acres of land in the Low FINAL DESIGN IS SUBJECT TO RQsiclentis, District G.2-4 dwelling units r acre),_located EVI'EW AND APPROVAL BY CITY Oaurtry Club Drive at`i rra Vista-AM PLANNER & CITY ENGINEER PRIOR TQ 20'7-411]�, 20,1,4 1_01 and AL TIM applicant Etas silo 'RECORDATION OF FINAL MAP. filed a Tree Removal Permit. 4-WAY STOP SIGN SIERRA VISTA & RED'HILL COUNTY CLUB DRIVE. P, EN R_0NW1iTAL ACT K-%P'0RT frog TF11;' CONTINUED TO 7� 2y87 MEETING. B U :A �� io�revtew and comma eMmunounoda o % }tion of the Draft Enviror�mentai Impact R t f p ,l6 "Foothill Boulevard Spec f:c Plan prole-ot„ 'the Spe!iiio plan consists of Matted lend use)' re�a dq-,s and standards for the development alonk--Foothill 'xoulevard. between Grove Avenue and Haven Avenue,between the I-15 Freeway and East Avenue. (Continued from dune 24,1987). CONTINUED TO 7/22J87 MEETING. Q. FQOTEILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN (Continued om June 24,1987, ` 04TINUED TO 7,22/87 MEE,'ING. R. RNWAONMENTAL A%Q,!�3SMENT AND GRA►gRAL PLAN` MENDMENT 87-03B LTI k UA' FI(;i C GAIdQI3GM. fW request to amend the Land Use Map of the General Plan to reflect land use changes proposed by the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. 1±M)AONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA CIFIC-2-1—AN AME D 87-03-My U. BAI�PC A - An amendment to remove from the EWW-afift Specific Plan apPoidmately 57 acres of land on the north side of Foothill Boulevard;between tm I-15 Freeway and Bast Avenue;approximately 5 acres of land on tho southeast corner,of Atiwenda Avenug, and Foothill Boulevard, and approximately 14 acres Of land oil the southwest corner of East Avenue and Foothill Brtdevard- APN 227-211-24, 25 &27,APN 227--221-01,03,0.7z-09,-14& 22-27,APN 227-231-19, 21,28, 29, 33 &34,API 20-3;11- 14 &15,APN 229-041-10,and portions of AP1t 227-231-16 do 23. t`y . l ! r f. IiPLSiiItONiMlEtITAaLa. ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTPJAL -C rig axCx mend10fit to remove�froa, the a' Indiisstr'—`z aRa�3ifecatc Plan epp^oxintately $O.acres of ` Ifi on*he soutix side of Faotliili RvulOvsrd betw6tn the w 15 f+reewa ,and`IUiivrar�ia,lvsaue'-4rP13 228-031-01;.16& 2.0 ai d�q i':oiia oi~2 , '081- or 59. VL Now Bur nw, APPROVED "0,WITH MODIFICAI LONE SN'i►1R0NAAR tMAt, A8SE33TdIEt3T AND DEVELQPbiB?i"L JmVJB* ,7-25� -,�RAS vawraent Of H 3,,39 ,RELATED ITEM G). adrg#_n�us6 M dai►.cai�f tirg of 14 sore Medical, Office send'z5.30 auer,acre �faimanistratiYe/Prais- .anal office in tw ladustld Pwk District(Subarea 71,,A dated on the north aide aif djvia Centvv Drivd between White O Street • f." atnd lied Qa`k Street-�rPki.208-35I.2$and 26. Related to "> this Qrojiect is the,request to arnend'the Uaccho Cucarsionga. Business Park MSaster jkm by redesi6ating`the subject site from. dgrpora't `Plena to ied wl Office and Administrative/Protessionai.Office,and the deletion of the public street coadvction through the site ares Related File$CUP 87-17 and PM 10696. APPROVED 5-0 WITH MODIFICATI� $NVIRONM4BNTAL ASSESSMENT AND T513'i+ELOPME?iT LANDSCAPING NEXT TO g 17 _ A, _ he drvel 'BUILDING ALONG HAVEN AVENUE. apcnent.o a 2,7ti0 square loot, 4 bey smevT&station can 0.69 aams of land within an approved slopping center in the Neighborbood Cominercial District, located at the northeast corner of f Haven and Highland Avenues-APN 201:271-68. APPROVED 5-0. U. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REMW -20 X11CHITR - A proposal to construct t a m •tenant ai one warehouse building totaling 66,374 square feet in the General Industrial District, Subarea 5, on 3.8 aer" of land located at the northeast ce ener of Turner Avenue and 6th Street -APN 209-261-18,19,22. CONTINUED TO 8/12/87 MEETING. V. HOMI!OCCUPATION PERMIT 87-255-CLSNEItOS-Appeal of s decision denying a home ccupation Permit at 10736 Sundance Drive. f i e P r 2 PPROVEQ 5-0. W. DBivi�iJP �]T„ ET :Yi' 8 -0 'i'C? f • P 4�Ea1, $i tt� �8ttt78 ttS lih�y* 8!! lIG P 8to7t `and f' �a t �,el�,� m�re�3 �=a J/?� ncl�eerree�for=a•ti�atce�oc�:ted' atnest.carster oP Fudt{tiPi Boulevard eIien Assn , 10?T='1Q4 ly;.. vm ,-xrectoz§8eparts lISSION RECOMMENDS X. 14�L &V6HU.E GILADl=e SEPARATION,,AT A.T.do S.F. x v 1 UNt1ERCROSSYNG. p rY a report on h i€etirEnge tllternats onsaderation& CCltf IISSIUN RECOMMENDS 3-2, y. VIc-rONTA Mir 11PI'Y TRAM,FL'fiCRlt4 -FRAIL WOOD FENCING. Gt3t+tMISSION SUPPORTS CONCEPT Z. `lICST001A 999-09 SZ-DNISiDN SIGid Pa0G1?.AM O'ALLOW PLANMED COMUNT THE ABILITY T(f,PREPARE Comrmis orr SS74N PROGRAM SUBJECT TO 'AU4,'iNING COMMISSION X. PubUe Comnents Bvr-OROVAL. DIRECTED STAFF fA. AT PREPARE A CODE AMENDMENT, This time dnd place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be 1,09cussed hwe are thosse which do not alreadyap�ear on this agenda. XL A410 r m*at 2 e t 5 a.Mn: The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative -Regulations that set an 11 p.nao adjournment time. if items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission i ,J _.. ... _..:._ _:...:. _,..,_,. ;S..�z., ...�.,� ': __ .,.. _...,tka'r,�. ,.mow..:. •�` 7 VIICINITY MAP r i c' f'4 .�.e a r.. �.er�.o..� ,.ee7 f.eeo.�.e �.♦ w �r.a.e.er..re,.N e.... ........... ...vl A € = L^ 1 ref NIL LSIDJ ( !. t i R :um p mm 4e! 0 T=fL II Eiif/AY<, VicRfA .r Lo a I AA 1111 t: 1 e� to a CHU PICK s $ 4isIWILL<R 1 J �o.taaeew°u000w ♦e°owow ss A ° r a s • • -49 a w etftcc w at SAN ® RICIARDIN VKl3W Y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONC'jk ram-- Clrf OF RANCHO CUCAM©NGA { STAFF`REPORT DATE: July S. 1987 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commissior. FROM: Brad 8u11er, City Plann4 BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner. SU8',c',Cl: RESOLUTI011 O6.APFR©VAL- FOR MINOR DEYELOPMENI REVIEW 86-22 " reques o a ow a s a e oar ramp - _ rear wa area of a single --family locatid at 1C,OO7 Manzanita Drive. - APN,2O1-8gy-1a. I. BACKGP,OUND: On June 24, 1987, the Planning Cofaission conducted a j Baring consider an appeal of staff's denial of a Minor Development Review- application for a skateboard ramp in ie, rear k yard area of a single family residence. After receiving all of the AOL testimony on the proposal,: the Planning Cogxission stated that the use of the skateboard ramp would be permitted Providing certain conditions were imposed to mitigai:e impacts on adjacent 1 properties. These conditions, included limiting the hours Of operation, limiting the number of skateboard riders, installing lindscaping to provide a more aesthetic appearance, and providing additional insulation to reduce the noise level. Staff has attempted to casitact the applicant to discuss these conditions, but have been unable to reach the applicant. { II. E! ION: Attached for your review and adoption is the" i es u o provai with Conditions. spec 11 sut-j tted, rad 8 ler City anner BB:SM:sgr Attachment: Resolution of Approval with Conditions ITEM A, RESOLUTIOR NO A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 86-22 FOR A 'y SKATEBOARD RAMP LOCATED AT 10007 RMNZARITA DRIVE IN THE VERY SOW DENSITY-RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT r APR: 201-891-I1. WHEREAS, on the 6th day of April, 1987, a complete applicatibn was filed by Marcus %Icmon for review of the above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 24th day of dune, 1987, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning, Commission held a meeting to consider the above-described project. Now. T{EREEORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1. That the following can to met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the-Development Code and the puro��,.es of the district in which 'the site is located; and; 2. That the prd�osed use, t ' ter with the conditions appiicabl.e thereto, rai11'. be di)trimental to the public health, suety, 04.. '�61fard, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 3. That the proposed project is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code;>and 4. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environmen an s categorically exempt in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. SECTION 3: That Minor Development Review No. 86-22 is approved subject to r-e iaTTowing conditions: j 1. Operation of the skateboard ramp shall be limited to the hours of 9a00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. 2. 'The maximum number of individuals permitted to use the ramp at any one time shall be limited tc eight (8). 3. The underside of the ramp shall be insulated with carpet or other noise attenuating material and the ends shall be enclosed to reduce noise impacts, t . r f Pt ANIJ+Na 4 Si �Y E�So VT,1,O� NO r MDR 96 22Xm o July Off, 1987 Page ,t` J 4. Lancisca iMdj sh&N* be _� eovided to sof too, the y appearance o7 ,amyp` The landscaping shall be ine a7Xed t& d" sa' rsfaction of tie ,City Planner wia,1n. Aty t6D�,days. 5. All neces�a ,y permits .shall be obtained from the Bu lding ffiv+sion. r. APPROVED AND ADOOTED THIS 8711 DAY OF JULY,, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF T11E STY�OF RANCHO CUCAMGNGA BY Larry 1. McNiel, W r-wn ATTEST: elf, —Elrii u -er, pu:y acre a v"� Y, Brad Sutler, Deputy Secretrg of t �n9 Ciiz Sion of the City of Rancho Cuca pnga, do hereby certify thjt thk Vbregoint gesolutfon was duly and ., regularly ipttroducE r pd5$ed, and axdop Dc by the; Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cgca�aonga,..at a regular-�ettng nf`'the Punning Commission held on the Sth ',lay of July, .19.87, by the fall'�eing Yatm3-tovWt: p. AYES; COMMISSIONERS: P NOES: COMMISSIONERS: r ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: -3 ... ', I , J2f//J �fi i 1 '- �ITY OF� NCHO CCUGAMONOA G�X ro STA FF REPORT 1977 ©ATE: July 8, 1987 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner W1 Debra Meier, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIROf! NTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPHENT REVIEW 87-22 MESSENGER CAPITAL PMTNtKb - Ine aeveloptaeh ,7<o, a mare ouse industrial buTWng of 260,538 square 'feet on 12.6 acres of land wlthilat the General Industrial District (SubaarEa 14), located on the east side ofSanta Anita Avenue approximately 1,800 feet north "of 4th Street - APN 229-321-14, 16, 16. I. PROJECT AND srm DESCRIPTION: " A. Actin Requested: Issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning : North - vacant land; Industr1al Specific Plan Subarea 14 South Industrial facility; Industrial Specific Plan Subarea 14 East Railroad right-of-way and vacant land; Industrial Specific Plan Subarea 15,.-_ West - Vacant land and truck ,;7 facility; Industrial Specific Plan Subarea 14 C. General Plan Designations: Project size General Industrial North General Industrial South General Industrial East - General Industrial West - General Industrial D. Site Characteristics: The.natural ground slopes southerly at an approz�ma gradient. The site is void of significant vegetation. Street improvements along Santa Anita Avenue are existing up to the north property line of this parcel, parkway improvements will occur with the development of the project. ITEM B PIANNI $ LO� ISS20�+[ TA F `REPORT F OR 87 - MESSEt fi+'fif duly page 2 : E. Parking,G.elculations: No. of No. of Type�of„ Square Parking, races Spaces Use _ Footage Ratio Required Provided Office 2,070 1/250 9 9 Warehouse 968,468 * 85 236 Total '248 * Warehouse/distribution parking ratio: i 1/1000 for the first .20,000 square-feet 1/2000 for the second 20,000 square feet `r 1/4000 for everything over 40,000 square feet. IL ANALYSISs ^f A. Genera" The applicant is requesting Environw.,lital Assessment or !e construction of the w Mehouse building. Upon approval tia of the Negative Declaration, the City Planner will grant' approval of the project based on conditions recommended by the s ` Design and Technical Review Comittees. c: "t B. Design Revirew Committee: The bes,'-,n Review Committee (Chitiea,,; ie and Coleman) reviewed this project on dune 4, 1987. The Committee reco►tmonded approval of the . project with the following conditions: 1. The screen wall along the streetscape shall be 14 feEt high with landscaped berms up to a b'-8' Mall height facing the street. ;(See Exhibit IV). i 2. Provide an enlarged detail of the plazas for Planning Commission review, The eating areas should be pulled away from building entries to the extent possible and separated from the entries by use of landscapir% and/or low profile walls. Also the eating arks I should be screened from the loading area by usik'ig screen walls and landscaping, (See Exhibit 'E2'). 3. Provide alternate color ship selections for the accent stripe to be reviewed by the Planning Commission. . 'i '71 77, PLI AV dIW l SSA Old ST1tFF REPORT .;' OR t rlage 3 i 4. Provide landscarping along the south builditdg el,. vatiM (1 tree per 30 linear foot building f66010- to fnterrupt the expansive-horizontaai and ace as w6lI as* provide shaOr� to the seal Is (I trte per 3 stalls). (see C. Technic `1 Reyes 000 ttm* The Technfoai Review Committee hays,a 1J rev e►, "proaeG_ a , de�tenai, id that ,�i,�� reqoa�� ed � t� conditions of xpprprral. the Peet .,fs con iEenf� appli able t inda�;c(s and, ordindn ,M, The applicant tl 1, conditioned to underground utilities along the Santa_ prtatta' Itvenue f"ran.3ge; D. Env ironme'rkt-al Asseswnte'., Upon review of Part l of the Initial Muqy anU PQMp10et1Oft'-OT Part II of the Environmental Checklist, staff hp. found no significant impacts rebated to the ^' development of this industrial .buildiing.. V. RECOMME C'ION: Staff recor,� p# that a Negative 'Dwlar+ tfon be i sue r evelopment Revie�i�" -gz. esF�.-c 1 subiotted, #*+ 'Brad u: I b City anner BB. :sgr Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map s Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit OV' - Building Elevations I Exhibit "D" - grading Plan Exhibit "E" - landscape Plan f t r' a NORTH CITY CF RANG C L EA MONCAt�rl R ANNM DR7SM EXHtiBT-. SCAM 6-14 IT�._..�. a t iMITI � t ! ` ( It - r 7 1 Et t t � ( r � rn Aear�r amClI - `Y CFra. : ` were aav;,.�+er f, sAKttetllf!SSarltava ao.nx.o.a.wr..ww,_1 I N(I�'kl CITY qq � �2 T a Pi.ANN G Danslopq EXHIM'=_ _ SCALD a y �'•�sr '1 WYUIFONIW/�.. NQIR1TIi4[YA "' 1 t { "lgq#T lLR!^k:�id6 ••>rer�..ww.aw. LAinwnsrw...�q 5� CITY OFa KM DM% SCAU_ t l I, am grMtL yRZ. .;It •u rf7rec -�llj w..v.wra 1 / a lFR 4 1 IMfCRf' u0p4Y. sm lei Cam' OF rrlm. RAAUM { i TITLE- R,ANNU% DWWN ExI-ur.. SCAM � J_ �I < �- .-RPM �� 4«wv �<%� �.. � ¥ ± • � �. ¥ _ � ® � - �®® �� © �� - �®�•m�£ f2 « mws«sa_3 %«d«�• x - r.. . . .+l � . r ® r ® r o ''` ��'�-�- � "��i. CIA►=.'\ . ® o .. , ..*�•j��1 �/fit r �.r ---— 7— CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REP6RT (A a 4 Vim y 1977 DATE: July 8, 1987 Tel: Chairman and' Kimbers of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad duller, City Planner BY Debra Meter. Assistant Plamner SUBJECT: ENfllkt0WENTAL ASSE_SMENT FOR DEVI LQPPiENT REYIEN 87-46 - e, eve:.apmen or, a.. , , ,; square toot 1541 -r a waf•ehouse buildifng on 10.8'acres of ,• �' land .in the �91dimua Impact Heavy Industrial District (Subarea 9) located 'at the southwest corner of. Jersey Boulevard and Vincent Avenue - APN 209-1�43-13 and 11. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning.. Morth - vacaffl an n us r a Specific>�Plan (Subarea 8) South - 9 isting warehouse; Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea East - Hoffnger Industries; Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 9) Best - Vacant land; Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 9) C. General Plan Designations: Project STW"--'Heavy Industrial North General Industrial South - Heavy Industrial East Heavy Industrial Best - Heavy, Industrial D. Site Characteristics: The 10.8 acre parcel on which this warehouse is of o be constructed currently contains 163,200 square feet of industrial buildings. On-site uses include industrial manufacturing and warehouse. The parcel to the west is of the same land ownership and is also intended for future development. The south parcel line abuts the A.T. and S.F. Railroad tracks. The property slopes southerly. at an approximate 3% gradient. L ITEM C PLANNING COMMNsIoN STAFF REPORT DR 87-06 - @gl4RTIN•s'uUOURAL DESIGN July 8, 1087 r Page 2 E. Parking'6icuiations: k-; Number of Number of 6 Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Existing ~ ` Office 4,530 1/250 18 18 Manufacturing,. 35,000 1/500 70 70 � Warehouse 125,000 91 91 i g Subtotal 179 179 Proposed H Office #2,000 1/250 8. f Warehouse 5%277 * 36 36 Subtotal 43 44 Total 222 223 � .'fix ri R Warehouse/Distribution Parking Ratio: 1/1000 for 1st 20,000 ; sq. ft.; 1/2000 for 2nd 20,000 sq. ft.; land 1/4000 for everything over 40,000.s-y: ft. The ratio is.applied to each building to determine. individual parking demands. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is requesting Environmental Assessment o—r tTie construction of the warehouse building. Upon approval of the Negative Declaration, the City Planner will grant approval of the protect based on wonditions recommended by the Design and Techhical Review Committees. B. �Design Review Committee: The Design Review Coawittee (Chitiea, ►cgfei�o eman) renewed this project on June 18, 1987. The committee recommended approval of the Aroject with the following conditions: 1. Provide articulation to the building corners, particularly near, the street intersection, to create a focal point Also, the entire building frontage along Jersey Boulevard should receive a greater degree of texture, pattern, or other treatments to upgrade the image along the streetscape. The color choice is appropriate considering the color of existing buildings on site. The applicant has added an accent band across the building face in an attempt to adress Design Review Comjittee concerns (see Exhibit "CO). Staff recommends that the Negative Wt PLANNING COMIS-KON STAFF REPORT` OR 87-05 - MARTM STRUCTURAL DESIGN �, . July 8, 1987 Page 3 {A�+ Declaration be issued and the applicant to continue to work, with staff to satisfactorily address the architectural treatment of the building prior to theCity Planner's approval. 2. All roll.-up doors are to be painted to match building color and not the accent color. 3. Provide pockets of landscaping and vines on the east building face within the vehicular parking spaces, 4. Upgrade and replenish landscaping wherever necetsar'y along the entire length of Vincent Avenue. 5. Provide an 8 foot screen wall, compatible with building materials and color, to screen the loading area from the lunch court." A gate can be provided f, for employee access to the lunch court from the rear f, of the building. C. 'technical Revi ittee The 7,t lcal Review Committee has f6viewed z e pro ec an deg:�radtni�d that with reccomended.. conditions of ap;;n,el, the project is consistent with applicable Standrieds and Ordinances. The applicant will be conditioned to underground and contribute to future undergrounding of utilities along Jersey Boulevards, Vincent Avenue, 8th Street and along the railroad right-of-way. The applicant has-' indicated that such extensive undergrounding requirements will place an undue financial burden on this project. D. Environmental Assessment: Upon review of Part I of the initial Study an comp a an OT part IS of the Environmental Checklist, staff has found no sigi°,ificant Impacts related to the develol"at of this industrial building. V. END ,3ON• Staff recomends that a Negative Declaration be ssu o 11 eve opment Review 87-o6. R spect y spitted, Brad Bui e City Plan er BB:OM:n Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Building Elevations Exhibit "D" - Landscape Plan VkC"T FADftRTY Fy A I i NOM CITY CF RAN c-LjcAmoNTGA TITLE= PLANIvM I3I`'YMN EXHIBTT: SCAsLE=-- _ .. 1 /. r 1 1llll�1lJ !l l 11 i Aso > L �/� ��{�1�y��p 711'/•�A i'..iAY > Nf CITY CF = RANTCM CU AMONI TGA a i OrAs"Y' lsLSVA-l70W r ` sOYTM 8=.l NATION �. NIOT mY11tV/1T/ON' I� CITY OF PLAMM DMSM EXHI r=_gam s�UY r, C�� n�...as`� .a►sakexat a heat .. yyrr�`w��a-hr�.. .4dUC i�i7fl�W QID 2t-bGr�. FEPtltg raw►•7t•�t+•ab birTY�CgMMIr,+,}n� (� 17-le+a. r•sf�Y+�gRt•1711U►`1kM:l°3�' IE�4t•1oM. !q!r!IxdM4C►R'1�!lIiA f"w GRq.p(�COfYR� - Mww m+ aof WPM UHP.00^ k+n arcs *ewase."m W^wopftv. M CITY OF rat= P"NN rvc r WMN Wlmwrr- SCALE-- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT y DATE.='> duly 8, 1987 1977 TO: Chaim and Members of the F, Mg Cwnmission FROM Brad Butler, City Planner BY: Howard Fields, lkssistant Planner SUBJECT: EHVIRdNmENi l_ A sSM'€_ AN TENTATIVE TRACT 13307 - e eve orn of""a'19 MUT sn ,v s '.� Ton ; G acres of land in the Law Residential" District (2 dkiIin.g units per acre), located west'of the intersection of Amethyst Street and,11?ghland Avenue APN: 201-711-01, 02,.,03. The:;applicant;aas. also filed a Tree Removal Permit. Related file Variance 87 03. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: _ A. Action Requested: Approval of a tentative tract snap, elevations, n is`�suance of a negative declaration, s B. Pro3ect DenSity: 2.7 duelling units per acre C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: Nor - An ex s ng w e easement, Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Future Foothill :Freeway right-of-way, East Existing single family residencin, Low Residential District (24 dwelling units per acre) West - Existing singie'family residences, Low Residential District (2.4 dwelling units ►,,,peer acre) D. General Plan Designations: Project e - L01d Resideatial District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) North Low Residential District (2-4 (b>elling units per acre) South - Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units piir acre) and Senior Citizen, Senior dousing Overlay District East - ` ow, Residenti,41 D'-trict (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre): ITEM D .,o F PLANNING COMIMISSrgif STAFF REPORT 0, Tentative Tract 1336t PenT.Mll Development r3uly 8, 1987 A E., Site Characteristics: The subject site slopes from north -�o.., sou at gems: 'Mere are tWO existing douses fronting !'ielloran AV'enue that are slated iY r removal. Where is ah an.. existing house "fronting Amethyst. Avenue which tact.. 0{rectly adjacent to and parall '' willJt ineling the p' ct site ,.to the north Is rt Y05' bride strip of property owned by MW9 that �=ntains a major, Water lire. North of the MWD propertiy are a a' existing single family hoses. The land iemedia,'tely td� the south is vacant and reprLsents Col Trans` right-raf-way for'4he future cotlstiQCtioDfof the Route 30 Foothill Freeway:" A tree 5.x removal permfit has been filed along with this project prpp"ing ` the r,."ova, W 26 eucalyptus des. (Refer to T estavat Plan, WAbit "I") U. ANALYSIS: A. Generals . The proposed site plan consists of 18 new single TTlyTomen,and. one existing home to remain on-dots ranging from 8,600 square feet to 1,1,8D0 square feet. The site plan provides optimal unit plottVJ :given the narrow parcel width (231 ) in orienting the rear yard areas away from potentially , .' hamful noise levels generated fiwm the Roate 30 For Phil l Freeway, In addition, the ' osed street aligMent pl9ows ttze extension of H ghlsnd Avenue to mat-sh up 'With existfng center` Tines 4't intersections on Hellman and Apethyst Avenue, minfWiaing potential traffic conflicts created bf offset 4-way. intersections. The architectural program consist;- of 3 different floor plans ; having three and four badroom• layouts, with 3 different elevations per floor plan, The elk,�evat9ons are of cor3emporary styling with file roofing;st=:o,, brick;, and rock veneer, and wand plant-oref (see Exhibit,a`"), - 8. Design Review view Cc+ae�ittee !he Committee (Eme�ick and Buller) recaeaeen approVa o, the tract`.ap and design elevations with minor revisions such"as: 1. providing architectural treatment to all corner units ant, units subject to public views. 2. A 5" high, masonry rtturn wail be provided along ue southsida of Lot 17' and northside of Lot 19. J 3,. A 6` high masonry perimeter wail be provided along` the lI entire north property line. I 4. Floor plan #r120 be used on Lot 2 with a modir,`cation for a 6 '' amide-on garage with access"off of Highland Avenue. `1 o Z. r w m, PLANNING•COMIS&LON 5Tti " RT Tentative,`Tract-.13367 =' null Development July 8,, 19O Page 3 "? S. Fi-oor plan #110 should be used on 6.l_..--Oropose+d R to 1 slopes along the--east side of Lot 19' should be filled iri:„rqd 4' of wroL ht iron fencing be provided at the' 1^ "wail (see Sevtion EE of grading plan, Exhibit 'V v t 7. The 6' wide park4*- -the southside of Highland shall 'be provided Witt :-tr< t tolerant varieties of trees, shrubs of var*cus ground cover, and rockscape. E_ The project en�,rauce�, off of Amethyst Street shall be treatipol with •landscaping, specifically along the MWD E ,: rightir•lf-teas,:, 'I( D. Tree Removals The.'arburist report recommends the preservation, i pa' sass n-e,of th'e ruining Eucalyptus Windrow located along the ;hest side ssf Amethyst However, due to the street and drainage improvements that,ar, necessary. 'as part of tract development, the Eucalyptus Windrow, will have to be removed as well as the Phoenix Canariensis (Canary Island Palm). Staff._. recommends relocating the Canary Island palm to a s�table location on site. E. Envimnmental Assessment:. Staff has completed the Initial St740--P—aff-It'and determined that the project will not present any significant adverse impacts upon the environment. However, there will be potentially harmful noise impacts generated by the future Route 30 Foothill Freeway. Also, the project frontage along Psmethyst Street will need —.-.; street and storm drain improvements. The reconYtructior, of Amethyst Street is part of the City's capital improvement program with Phase I commencing within the next fiscal :near. _ m act• The project site will bw transverred by harmful ,nbise� his UP to 70CNEL generated by the Route 30 Foethili FreSrW Mitigation-. Construct ,an 8' high perimeter block wall and incorporate double ylaied windows on all units facing the proposed Route 30 Freeway. Also, a detailed final acoustical study on materials used in the buildit,- design and construction will be required, prior to issuance of building permits. Impact: The project will be required to reconstruct Amethyst <�at the easterly site boundary to accommodate a depressed Route 30 Freaway and to handle upstream surface flows. Mitigation: The developer will be required to `1�iild a fully Improved aethyst Street fra•ttage per Engineering Division recomm:nded conditions 1 appr4aal (See. Resolution). These €'s77'� 'r jt PLANN �OI I4SS1i1A)11 FF'REPORT Tents i e act. ?jai Pennhi I Development � July Page 4 z, y improvements will mitigate flood ' problems and convey all rt surface flows properly, III. FACTS.FOR FIM1,NGS The findings listed on the attached resolution are supper;e_ . a following facts: a. The proposed subdivision, in conjunction with the,conditions of approval,, is consistent with the current Dev6T'opment Standards of the City. b. The project is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the` propo d. number of Tots wfthiir the'subdivisior.. r. c. Adequate street and storm drain impmveanents will be provided to make the project, corapatible,,with .the surrounding area and improve circulation and drainagt.;in the vicii.ity. d. The project is consistent with the General Plan and coR�omms a with the Developmmment.Standards of the Low Residential D "str,ct in which the site is located. IV. CORRESPONDENCE* This item,has been advertised inThe Daily Report, . newspaper and 6.1ces were sent to all prpperty,owners wI a TR r of the project site. To date no correspondence have been received for or against this project.. �s V. REC rION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission appro en. ire Tract 13361 through the r4option of the attached eso foe anf* conditions, approve the Tree' Removal Permit, and ssu a Negatives Declaration. Res p f ly fitted, I �' B a I l e t City Tan r B .HF•vc Attachments: - Exhi`bit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "By - Site utilization Map Exhibit "C" Tract Map Lihibit "D" - Site Plan Exhibit "Ell - Elevations Exhibit "F" Landscaping Plan ;xhibit`"G" - 6rading Plan Exhibit "H" Floor Plans Exhibit "I" Tree Removal Plan Resolution of Approval of Conditions f Y.. x ' UnA ICA � Y T Xx WE ' x s _ • may.. - (�A ��t�' 1 S 'R� '• `+� 1 TM S t l 1� r . y � 1 i TEN T.4AATIVF. TRAcr hd®. 13397 a ME cmgrum=m«A s - f1wm-f 665 11YAfnn��i fA tA1lA6i! i. 1!tlY1Y Wilt xe�loss. Acs" i7T. - —------MIMS tw a I� xw a I& k AYAYt➢19g7fAtN Y� � iuY:8NYf10 _. tf�f1i 13o�i s �. auaYrst� ®ana.cv�ae�ns. tJY t�� t„iv. � � �� E' 1 V MY ca u � i \� rr Ala � r \ t / till Nislit lot fill o wl � f yy Er 1r h a fill -. d Phi* a� a � lk 6ia " Nn I Ig � I , �I .�1•r' f Ila jo ell l::I�i+ air ls�a�.;t® »t�l14RiStl. lit r� t .$ I • n a .I I f�f i j E �'^�� 41Y 0.t p:1E60.4,s" • vlgl 1lp ptp� "' .�, ulGe1 agRaK w,py� ,.[�� ,4L►A �t,�g i(t1 , .. � ll e.�A aim : ........... � e®� aLltn io—1 14M *a Now M II III�EII I1i�i tf HI r ! PIN. . r a ` �.. IRS If i t �I In Will . . t - fillip -'� a IM 21 y IJ _�t. ,� . �:,., �, _ �' �. � �. ' �:� i �� ' __ � _ s F .p �. ._ ,: it .. +�_ .. —_...� �, 4„ ��. �� y i I' - _ �1' ,, > t i �" � th 1 � t � �, - � (FN, 9/�I, .I �.e.�_ r i d` �� ,/ .t1�' � ��.a ...--. _ , ti � . � :.` !,, *. . �y _ � 7,, •i� l; F MfYVI ti! ' .aMliiR e a T Aekz OW WIle Nr • n r, i wo • V� 4i I' 4 i i- :I E� �at 1 ` ,z, �hri �i t �,4✓� f r w 17, a t iIDIt E i .� ' , a �;• s � ( ;� `, �Dt 6/ P� f i 001 k_ ti t i$ 1 sp, '� � �C.e-pJbs+t"r"js'{'''.I �r.'�y:jrm!n ♦ �kq��,�}F. � � € e. `. . ,1. It f at 'rr till .. Prof ♦ - 4- I •<i t t �Y _ t - _ v+'�iw.P.�'G4�_q.�l'FRri!'^.RFk` w�.. -_ �x ,.•�Y"�4�'�._. y ri � --�- i _ = .fA a Alh jA also t ��.aw» .s,..►s.a sW�.: .t i l.11i11.TW,PM�@TW.{iWTM^.mow% JAiW!W �1�\tMBeI1.�Yr NKJLt.I H Ask 7 OF Em: ► ,perRANCHO auvdaNGA, . TM-Ei PLe�'VT"JING tij E HWP- t- SCALE:r_._ ly�lnp � R t a e RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE,PLANNING COMMI'.SSION OF THE C3TY,OF RANCHOCUCAMON�A, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATI`YE`TRACT MAP NO., 13367 MEWS, Tentative Tract Map lkb�. 13367, hereinafter °Map® submitted by Pennhill Land,Co., applicj t for- the purpose a subdividing, the real Property situated in the City. of. rcho Cucamonga County of Sam Bernardino, '+ pint s x Stag of California, described' as a decielo of a 19 1ot single family subdivision on 6.87 age's of land in the Low lResi'de6ti,al District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) located west of the intersection of Amethyst Street and highland Avenue - APN: 20141 -O „ 02, 03 into 19 lots, regularly, came t before the Planning Commission for pub:11c hearing and action on May i3, 1987; WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and planning Division's. reports; and 6 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering'and Planning Oivisi'dn's reports and has considered other evidence, presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, _the Planning Commission of the City of Rantho Cucamonga does resolve as foTlows: SECTION is The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to—rentative Tract No: 13667 and the 3ap thereof: k (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Cole, and specific pSans (b) The design or improoements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Developwnt Code, a,VI specific plans; - (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substaptial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not 1•kely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of thetentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the publ i A: at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. , i 9 PLANNING CORUSSION RESOLUTlQ,4 NO. Tentative Tract 13367 Pennhill De velapment July 8, 1947 Page 2 (9) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is Issued. SECTION 2 Tentative Tract Map No. 13367 a copy or which is attached hereto, s ere y approved suk -4ct Lei all of the follow ing candit3ons and the attached Standard Conditions; Plann!n Di�?ision . 1. Apptj6ipt sUI- submit an acoustical study prior to issuance of bui3o ng permits, ' ft- ind sates mitigation meac fires t4 achieve interior 6.vGNEL Maxri�r. Construction plans shall conform to the recohdationa„ti 'sid report,* 2. Material saVlts- shall be submitted to the ,.City Planner for approval prior to issuance of buff-Ong permits. 3. Landscaping and irrigation, including street trees, shrubs and ground cover, is required. Detail landscaping plan shall be submitted to the City Planner for approval prior to issuance. f building pe►Ats, 4. An eight and six foot masonry block mall `with-'tlecorative cap shall be provided along south east. property `tines, respeetf vely, E S. Architectural treatment shall be provided_ to' all corner units and units subject to public views. 6. Six foot high decorative masonry returns wall shall be provided along the southside of Lot. 17 and northside of Lot 19. 7. Six foot high decorative masonry perimeter wall shall be provided along ft entire north propeky line. 8 Floor plan #120 is to be used on Lot 2 with modifications for a side-on garage with access off of Highland Avenue shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. 9. Floor plan #1I0 shall be used on Lot 4. 10. Proposed 2 to 1 slopes along the east side of Lot 19 shah be filled in and 41 of wrdught iron fencing be provided at tho top of wall. 1. The 61 wide parkway along the southside of Highland shall`.be provided with drought tolerant varieties of trees, shrubs of various sizes, ground cover, and rockscape. The landscape plans shall ba reviewed grid-`approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. -AM PLANUIRG,COMNrs vgm�pE,OLUTION No Tenfa eve Tract 1 3Cr7 penn4fl7 l7exelopmant July H, 1997 Page 3 f 1? A s ec3al 1; dscApe.,treatmg9t=tnal'.I, be„prolvided at the project ent Once Off ``Amethyst. The landscape planes shall be reviewed and approved b *gip• Citry Planner prior,, to? tMtie Issuance of bull ding kpermi s. Engineertng 'Avenue An ,in 1'1eu feev as.Icontri'Agtion to the future urrder-g�rnunding of the exirsc�ng overhead utilities (te tecbw- in ccirbns� one the oppositeo side qo �o11 nan Avenue sham by �d o`3?te ri p r m,r orda; on ff the final 13 eye"` h ,l lie one�hNj the G ty adopted unit�a�uount times the Teti from tie centerline cf MMD ri0ht of'vagy to the centerliOf the futuren.State li 'ghway;gaute'3Q rights-;of-way, 2. Amethyst avenue -:An in-'lieu fee as contributifon to"the future unas gro4J ci ng ,• of the ex:stlrig.. ,-overhead utilities Ctelecoq unlc and electr.ica11 in the, :pppostti r side of � AmetEyt�ienue :shall be paid.to the City ,prior to, recordation of tfie fifna rtiap.. The tee sue; be,.one-half ties C�i=ty adapted unfit ,amount ti*S- the length from tfie centerline ;oft O, ;sight. � r of-way to the eenterTihe of the future�Svate Highway Oute 30 right-of-way. 3. The existing overhead utility service to Lou 19 shall be undergrounded in accordance with:the utility standards, prior to occupancy of the first house within the tract. 4. The developer shall coordinate the design and construction of Amethyst Avenue with the City's Capital Improvement Project located between 19tih Street and Highland Avenue to the satisfaction of the dirty Engineer, 5. Notice' of intention to form and/or join the Lighting and Landscaping District shall be filed with the City Council prior to recordation of" the map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. a. The driveway for Lot ig shall be relocated to take access from "A" Street or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 1. An easement and permits shall be obtaftdd from the Metropolitan Water District for any work within their right-of-way prior to recordation of the final ,map. g. The plans for all work along the tract's southern boundary shall be submitted to Cal Trans for review and approval prior to recordation of the final map. PLRN i�,G0 1 S �#ITtJN NO-, � TeqGa pie 7�rasct#i. 3 0,PenMT.%?oNVoTop�nt Jd ty Page 4 S Fi'APMI D,,+ IJ10P[��s`THFS BYtT'.13/�Yk4F'JULYt; 907. �• 4 PLANNING` 3Sj",ONL, of THE;Qi f OF CUCAM'o In „ci BY: Larry :. mc ATPESr: A #y II yk '- ra WIN*is ! e�Outyn re �Cy Y, Brad 80 let'-*,-ep- SrTta1 �of Nth, PT�ntung 'Coressi'sPr �f ther pity of y RancFra Ca�arpongay aer•eb3,r cerfy thde toT^egcsirn�� n rXas duly- a d regular?y inrodu� `c� `ssed and dda tee b� �P P„ T �nir� :ormisson of e City of RancYra Cuca� Aga, at a 1'agraT#wane ti�g.af a ?aning Camnrssion'ftettd on the Sth day 0, Jt t. 1987; Hy e+ o t�!ng atP to=wit:.' AYES: Commi�'sSIQNHRS: NOES:` C( DTSSLONERSs: t ABSENT: C&!j$SioNE.CS: w i 1 O =W Vbr44 GC.=L y . +.M .■ 4NY`�yy '`ar' ••� YpYira,ow>i SY�' `c`Q- �Cp. Eli COY, rqqy��o! *4 u} ♦i lC {Y� a.Y1 ), ;:. ti�_s�',NE�i-,$��g. �g��w 'gr� •yys�e� �aY � su.'ow=. 1.2 sLLS Ivaftisip-1- Rix '� gg r$ MsX w wii k LP 5111 Q y w$� �I✓r�'��Yw�.N O`LY� A: � V'��`' yr' 4M lw. �,� X� A, ma' s YX gGi .ri ~ grr`cc�' '` tlP ae�C Yr, lti ~ y R•d, �J►}r Alf m— ian`yy N.Y 4 .�V }6rJ G LY • t Y o+.r O 21 02 4 � My r ppp g At �iils.. sMy NZy*N� �" •• r� �"' a w _ gg pp Ns A+■ �s � o-X Ht l Ly�lCD T N C O i s. f O g u P 9 '+ \. r S tl 1..„y . 13 ci lag 7 fat 3. ,EqC. og plawy S.rt..«` Lq£Y it. a' 'gP.V=N •.•=�%w 9w 0 ¢¢¢p�. �� q$. ♦ Y iYyM � Y.OV �� Z. OR giy•� y AC.tlP�� YU� • ~. � „�p� _ �1 pe L� vQM+«i`B p.0 16 �uc1}p � �tlp�Y C. WIS l tl�.�€ "i��u q_QL■4Y�"pu.-. ��a�bv�� Gli�y �� S�� ;a:,. ,.� ;tll@A�y'ra S' Vtl'a .,vim:«Q6 C ya Ot!m i Y4Y_g_ A:- �y 4r •=e vY1 e�._ylip.`1. Gsom lds ftc'.m.'�L frM�wY; `4nu2i "' +t'�M.i' .gam_®� .S xWTTTi' ZC`iwil t 4�� V^ 2 q�0 fp Y_ Cp N y +}1 Y >C c rtlg g 4 �S i �YVp6y oY:! 1i uM`� -iT 9�g� xw' g� ap c•—�p • .pQ ra lO.. 1 �y?yNZ� TUJ �TTia _ F • �O I� " .11 ~ Ya 4 _ C sy u+o. F..}rxQQQ{��R "q' 4_a 'gtl 5yy� $S: BT� VtlS A► lM.M. cg NSC C€� 5 V$— � 'oo_a = � m��g +3 .�$ P'u«2`1��' ogg'iq �e Ay� ,sob �SQQa aV xs'~'stlopylp��.� su O^DOwyly;+M n �bq� P S �� ^O V`0,��W�^�a OP �• yyp� �I pp11_Y s • ^JL SCC �y. w L,�O'A}yuyyp YL�1 E �Vy�Y� M »Yq.', u1,,1II— «_ b�N �� ,�O��YA9✓2! {�C�N� �= ^LCC VN {11'Yi iL� ttl `.61 $C8 Ss .QI `Y 'fi '. O.,ee� ai .i,q LCa`Y+antw Y�Ng n� p»� .I ~�`Y .p� ii g.1 .�i SIA ~iIts g CNka 'y «yq n Y. YL «ITN NA+ + Y.8 Yo.Y ` 4p� Lo= ip s o.I » .r3 L a L♦♦xb ccpp `yy` O `y}� lN,YPrY p !I` M i tilt 13 Ef AL lift Zag cic s 'gg # g.5 HIS L ;q }; g �p Of e t,` L Y N' P H Nye �:.;. y y0l . A9{pCt. 6C1 �.» 6Nw I N 1 M ZA Vim r Y 6� -*'Y ! N A6N tl N R9tt � Yett YC V N per^ Fj �Y�ac•0. " iY.a L... .. Y —Fig �{�y� (4R �, L��y Pa3,� qyL.Rp NYO rL b� L �tl��r MMS Lai ppie Y q Y � " a r $ t " gi g IS .04 3 ""wd v -11 1 H i I M: Lwa L g su eb'i. n I"�.h a us zo = tea 1= SH 23, .2 YYg 4�1j yM dr it fill law '.g A � EN u un a'i m aL .'c. 5r$.. acs p JLl� �Yp. m. r� ILYa $as m' fir: a _ sElk v. LU Z$M '"►fit x` �?" •' ( i, Sog cu 1.� gMa �e � gin.�r u«.. `�' � � ► ► a `. $+. Zt �.. '�'` �,�' �� '3�a F►Ce4 _�' y _��yyy/ ,pi ii i pi t.� LP i•�' S��OMii YYE _ �� ` �Y � M Y rf.~ �• � �py�� +�. i s T OY'1 fS C i zu U Yrr 63 ".w o 4 � W j L Pa 3 zr, g,� Css =sari s�_ s 31 ag►ls —use 81 UZI E Y 5t� �.�v i via i ENV S!Izv 'flat E iE. 4" �» REV s42 �- x ? 3; j: �g l3s S�� a a ieu qci AJ 7 � 4 � u 1 I � � 1 [our $ F✓'q t Y C dL oCC 3'• .2 r rs tl 1-0 �>. i .'mom.�` ar - Jig w O L 0N YP r . �W �C` M� VY�`i�.+; L� � �� S � Y'�{Oy 4�1Ty�pNw rC ..w. pZtw '91 " !q ' + My tl {�' Yw ro 4 Y (► • ypy yR�tl.. rY9.L (�Y—CJ �cAO� MN —Qc1^ao}y� bVW +CC«. NOtl Y\ Nd �J �� b� Wtl Mf•Lf.i 9 -�� 4� i L.te z. !!NN 6 ��jj y of V y y. Z �o NJ•;f V .p tlyys .y�r' Y wyp p•'• �• at �y3� ev —Y — e a V «O Y 4 Z" 1 _ tl Sk its „ x tars gr x ti.y�p �CIO! � 1 F4 '76« g-,, ZY•np��y CIE ' 1 40 iVZ l All Y V�•"� Lt�. �.L C�'.O Lq; .mod'. "'VVV �y ayA y e. Ci Y O k 1 .. e 8Li �Fj {$ ®� 5 { Ni C$" e u 'V • J �s g�G V � 6�1V �. � Y •y le� w�0 C ` �.0 4„ is tWys� �i�t�y�`• 1 +nB O'� �u �YA, �•. N Y ` as F.� �L�� '• . Cd�j•D a \ C�� s ,gyy ON L` L �� Wig= "s - >>•-� �' ' ..a Ma 5;i Sow gi C`R� 4z US' 6a Y9 �w�� •I VGjY �� yTiO �` 6bO w .:P�L Yyf `� I '3�'�V gig yy r� � C�..Fi= i s g„:a � A" a- �� CITY OF RANCHO C7JCA1Mt)'zGAl s��o STAFF REPO]i� 'x O 1977 r DATE: July 8, 1987 `+ TO: Chairman and Members rf the planning Commission FROM: Brad Buiier, Cit y pl a nn er ' BY: Howard Fields, F�csis+cant Planner SUBJECT: VARIANCE 87=03 /A�NHIM DE_ EIOFKEHT A request to re sree e_:o n corner a yar setback from 27' to 23' on ati e. Sing 25,000 square moot lot in thel Low Residential .�i trivet (2-4 dwelling. units per .4'rel, located west of the intersection of Amethyst Street:",and Highland Avenue —APR: 102-�711-03., R -A d File: Tentat:eve Tract i3367. I. BACKGROUND: The applicant pro poscis to subdivide the subject property Into 19 single family lots. The owner's existing residence fronting on Amethyst venue will remain, but as a corner lot at the extension, of iffo,,and Avetiue. As required for the subdivision of reside._tia3" property, the Development Code (Section 17.08.040b) specifies V aC /the minimui corner side yard setback shall be, 27' as measu9tled. -,erom the ultimate face of curb. The applicant is requesting i --ariance-on thin aspect of the proposed subdivision. II. ANALYSIS: In order to develF� a site and to provide adequate circa a on r'or this site ana ,.djacent areas, the applicant, is proposing to extend high?and Avenue from, Hellman Aver-a to Amethyst Street. Highland Avenue will begin at the squthel n -t act boundary from Hellman Avenue extending east until it turns north and east to line up with the existing st:°eet at Amethyst Street. It is the Policy of the city to line up intersections or have them a sufficient distance apart to minisiize traffic conflicts. As a result of lining up the proposed street with the existing street, however, the; existing singtle family residence will not con;orr \,v the required corner side yard setback of 27 feet fGam face of cur h - the unit will be 23 feet from face of curb. 1 o tract snap could be ra-designed to provide the required setback bu the streets would no longer line up thereby increasing traffic conflicts and posing a potent�'al safety problem. The proposed alignment seems to be more desirable from a public safety {{perspective. -i IF M E 1 Gf PLANNING lTSSiON STAFF REPOR" I a Nariancell-03 - Pennhi'll Dertrel�pment Ju7v 8, 1987 Pagc+ 2 T is property als i has some unique physical limitations that are not typically foun"-nder similar zoning classifications. 100 foot MWD easement at W I-.srthern portion e^f,the site precludes any development fr`ora ,oecurrng:n fiat area. Also, the. relationship bet ears the existing si,"le family rssi'dense-and street.results in a deficient setback whale the street are aligned to provide safer traffic my,;dmeits. ILI.- FACTS FOR Fr.=�' The Development Code requires that the ",Llaann ni a-146m ss•Ton make certain findings"before the variance,can be granted. ;,ased em'the foll:awing facts, staff believes that there is sufficient justificatfM to make the recpssary findings-of x approval.: ,:. 1. The 27' corner side yard setback can be achieveC by shifting .0 street to'the ►torde. This would, however, result in an offse intersoction which would inc'r'ease traffic conflicts and pose potential safety hazard. The granting of the variance ,- would provide`-.a safer intersection than if the streets were offset. 2. The creation of tPie subs}andard setback results from the strict - »J.- interpretation oil' the Development Code and City policy for 4 street alignmens. 3. the property has unique physical Ti-stations (MWD easement, Existing residence, and existing street Intersection) that are not typically found under similar zoning classifications. The Planning Commission oust make the following findings, based on the information presented, in order to approve the variance: 1. That a strict and teral interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation imul.d result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical `tardship inconsistent with the objectives of the D:.yelopment Colie. 2. That there are exceptional ;,r extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to tLe property involved, or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally .to other prgperties in the same district. 3. That strict" or literal interpretation of enforcement of the , specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other p0perties in the same district - - - PL 9riNItEFORT Ya"r`iia`nce D:evolopmen July,8j4i4l a Page , 4. l'halt grantimtg a variance" will not constitute & grant of sp��ci�l priv414ge in onsistent atith trie "iim to iron5�f o;!tier propidiities J ciASS4 nest in< is sa ict. I grPantn' of ame y��*la S. That.-the a 1 . g nce will not the detHia�ntal =to that k( heap safe,, or welfare. ors 1 nj,ak6us ta:,, groper`tes or i`mpx'ovements in the rfcintity'. IY. CORRESPONDENCE- iiis it: t lra`s been advertisedas a public hearing m n Th �a�i�l; Repot .n paper, the propo�rt =pose ,.. and notices were set. , a a ;:prop'er4 im.oft with rn jbdl o'f tf�e=p-oj,;- site. Y. RECOWEVDATI0;;; Staff, recommends that the Planning, Commission r0n u6 a°.pu T z 'eaaring•to consider public input and elements of <„ this project If. after such onsideration, the Ceemissi�on can support 7 requ red i?i;ndfngs, ;`:her! adop�ion of tha attached 013 of approval would be.appropriate. ' espec 1 su 17led �� Brad Bu r City liner w,. OB: :vc €k . Attachments: Letter from Applicant k ' Gxh`,ait "A" Site Utilization Exhibit 480 Site Plan Resolution of Approval G C YY 'EQdJEST' FOR "VARIAPICE 3 TIII~-PEM;v GOkI�A�„I3�QiIESTS � ROAt:_ tlM STA MARD,.2"7 IT 111 WOUIRM FoR A CORM I AR11 SZTBAQK, To:A alu Olk mx=- 3 FOOT OliMS ON. ,T,His J REO-IMS ` IS ftOTMARY TO A7.TPW FDR pM EXT s old or x `I 'A f �41 i 77 J .c, --�` , s ` r 3 - i rr I CIS a - r Al . ) 1 ire • �� '�- Ilk sk IT RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVTWG VARIIVICE NO. 87-03 TO ALLOW REDUCING THE CORNER . SIDE YARD SETBACK; F4ORl 27 FEET TO 23 FEET, LOCATED WEST OF THE INTERSECTION :OF AMETHYST STREET AND HIGHLAND AVENUE, IN THE LOW RWDENTIAL DISTRICT PN: 201-711- A. Recitals (i) PENOMILL DEVELOPMENT has filed an application for tka issuance if a Variance, Mi. 67-03, described above in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject variance request is referred to as c "the application";. (ii) On the 8th day of July, 1987, the Planning Commission of the E, City of ,Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing en the subject matter of the application, and said public hearing was concludes` prior to the adoption of this ;Resolution. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. bVAP 8., Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. T,is Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidc!nce presented to this Commission during the above-referenced July m 1987, hearlcg, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Cission hereby specifically finds as follows: a) The application applies to a 6.87 acre parcel in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located west of the intersection of Amethyst Street and Highland Avenue. b) The properties to the. north, Id.ast and west of the subject site are presently designated for reyidenti'a1 uses and are cyirrently'detelop6d with single family dwellings. The property to the,,south of the subject site is designated for residential u�es and is currently vacant. c) The application has b"p-submitted to allow tale reduction of the corner side yard ethack from 27' to 23' for ,�ot 9 contrary to the re,Vuirements of Sectioti: 17.0E.040 of #ia Rancho Cucamonga Development Code requiring corner side yard setbacks within the Low Residential District to have a cot,ner aide yard of 27' .., PLANttING166 I�SSI�ON"� UTION NO. RE801. Variance` 8 03, PeonJI1'Devel ape+:nt ~>)1 July 8, y987 - %I r.: Page 01 d) The, variance as spedfied in the application will not a contradict the goals or objectives-.of `td, Rancho. Cucamonga General Plan or (' Devel opment 'code%,and,will not promote a•detrime`ntal condition to t}a persons or property in the>>immediate vicinity of VL, subject site for the reasons as follows: (i) The 27' corner sidc y-trd setback can be achieved by 3 shifting tht'street. to Me north. This..reoulO;�nwevar, result in an offset intersection which would';increase Ala;€ffc cohfict and .pose a potential safety hazard. The°,_granting of the variance wduid provide a safer -intersection than if the i'trfeets were offset. (ii) a The 0eatiqn of the substandard setback results from the strict interpretation of the Development Code ",.Zity policy for street alignments. (iii)_ The property has unique physical limitations MOD easement, existing resiaence., and existing street intersection) that are not ty?icalty;,round under sir.11ar zoning classifications, e) The granting of the subject variance will not Ise oletrimAtal to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injwiious to properties of improvements. in the vicinity. IS 4. 8ased upon the findings"and conclusions set forth in par-doraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the applic=pTan with the ` following conditions �\ a) Apprttvvel of Yaeiarce 87-03 shall be contingent upon approval of Tentative tract 13361, b) All applicable conditions if the Resol!,ition of approval for Tentative Tract 13367 s -,11 apply, APPROVED AND ADAPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JULY, 1987. PLANNING COMMIroSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO ZUCAWONGA BY: Car ry .—ft IieT,—Lna- rman ATTEST: --Frad Buller, epu y ecre a.;y RX YaridtC�# tx �t tkiyf'� 1987; :+ , page or F, grad BW i e�, Dept: E�f the nn ng�Gsro� or, ty ;;off g. Rancho Curra�aoAo re far ti� R d�� . d � one A °_, ' on `th6�b6 day f. ' CilIML'SoitERS J` ,1- AYES.- HOES: caIssr �.. AOf#.SEM commtE'SIv i ti CITY OF RANCHO Ci7CAMONGA GucAnr STAFF REP, T , o ' ? i977 DATE: July 8, 1987 TO. Chairman and Piers-tof the1nning Commission,Pgi FROM, Pad Buller, City Planner ' BY: Greg Gage, Assistant Planner ? SUBJECT: ENVIROMEIi A4 A,%$eSSNWE AND CONDITIONAL: USE PERMIT 87�-2_3 ,requesto es USE olish a church, aWIZ111111 an e:cs•a inn wat•T1i tenant industrial` complex in the ' General Industrial District s(Subarea 11) Tocated at the `7 northeast corner,of Sixt{r Street and Utica Avenue APH: F : 20� 411-17, I. PP.OJECT CHARACTERISTICS: A. Action Requested: Approval.f a Conditional Use Permit for a cure . B. Surrounding��Land Use and Zoning: or vacant; SuSarea 11 South - Vacant; Subarea 11 East ft ant; Subarea 11 West - Coca-Cola Facility; Subarea 6 C. Generli Plan Desi nations. a ra ect` Size - General IndustrIal Ncrth - General-Industrial South - General Industrial East - Generai Industrial West - Industrial Park D. ;Site Characteristics: The., proposed use is located within an existing multi-tenant multi-tenant industrial complex. Building 2 includes 8 tenlant suites, two of which are 'currently occupied by a computer service and supply firm Mind a medical research and manufacturing firm. Buildings 1, 3, and 4 am largely vacant, alth%Ugh 6 of the 25 tenant,spaces in Buildings 1 and 4 are occupied by','-rious industrial or quasi-industrial tenants (see Exhibit `S"). .r R ITEM F WI PLANNUG CGWISSIN STAFF REPORT CUP 87-23 PACIFIC SCENE INC., July 8, iP8 Page 2 u �q E. Parking Calculations; Numbe'A of NLmber.of I:. Type Square PArKintl Spaces; Space; I of Use Foota e �ati0' Required Provided Church 1,737 1I35 50' > ' 23e {seating During eeettings and weekends (total. within•,.�4 tt). 11, ANALYSIS: A. General: The Highland Community eovenr, *'(Church is proposing W use'apprdximateiy 5,610 square :feet .tenant space withiI ,_, r ` Builditrg k, which has a total floor a of 18,690 square feet. " The proq.9:z;..entails establis n v onctuary of approxlmately� 1,737,square feet and anc�'lary uses includ."T h offices, cl#ssrooms, a reception area, (kitchen and nursery (see Exhibit "C*). The churchC;�,roposes 1'o"Occupy the facility from 8:30 a.ra. D 12 noon on auundays.1 with occasional group Weetings during the week. The church 1has ind dated that tic more than 30 persons would attend such meetTngz:;,_and a conkiitien has been included within the attached Resolution speci7yi'ng the permitted times and,;;iaes of all meetings. i Two c' tt-, fundamental issues surrounding this type of proposal are: 1. Compatibility between the proposed use and existing or future uses within a multi-tenant complex; and 2. Availability of ors-site. arring, St. significant compatibilii.y conflicts are anticipated between the church use and other uses,41 the complex, since the main activity within the church will occur on Sundays, when all f other tenants within the complex are Inoperable. Al-though some church activities will occur during tho week (i.e. office v-,e, group meetings), the impact of -pch incidental uses upon other tenants would be negligible. Large group meetings should be limited to evening hours. A total of 230 parking spaces are presently available om-t6e site. Given the limited amouht,of d�.ti\�,ity t(eich will �.�cur evil within the church daring the week', Netweerr 8 a.m. and 6 p.m.), the likelihood of parking cn;ustra4.nts as a result of the church { •�,�" Pl.A?aMNG COFfitYSSTOti STAFF REPORT CUP 87-23 PAC i Ic SCENE INC. July 8, In7 Page 3 use is Llinimae. Based dpon the ;.reviously noted sanctuary size (1,737 square feet), the Development Code requires at least So parking spaces For this project. The existing ressite ,Parking , assbe adequate to acco�modate the use derir..g weekend asseAa+1 ies. B. Environmental Assessment, Part I a!' thle Initial Stud has been comp e e y° .' aPl"rca`rt. Staff has i wRpleted Part Ii of the Environmental CN.cklist and has found-n4i significant impacts on the environmeot'as a result of this pro4(ect. III. PACTS FOR FINDINGS: r 1. That the Proposed' use is in accordance with the General Plan, the objectives of the i Develo and the ;r u pment Code Y p rpose$ of the I+ 3ustriati Specific Piar.Subarea in which the site is yOcated R. That the proposed use veal not be detrimental to,the f public health, safety, or welfare,, or materially iNWriaus to the, properties or it pOlovements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed Use complies wii,h each of the ,k applicable prlvis�.wns of Ve complies,- Specific IY. CORRESPONDENCE: This itL, nas been advertised as a public tearing y-'Ae r to a1t newspaper, the property posted and notizas sen' pr-property oQrs within -0 feet of the Project site. Y. RECOMMENDATION., Staff recommends that the Planning Commi,siom approve `motional Use PeWt 87-E3 through the issuance of a /ATgati iaration and adoption of the attached Resolutlon. R sPev `�51 . submi ed, Bra-1 $ gr ( , Ci . anner ,r BB:CG•te Attachments: titter fry Applicant Exhibit "A" - Loc;A;ion Ma Exhibit "B" - Site Plan(Tenanc of Buildings 1, 2, and 4 Exhibit "C" - Floor Pltn Y Rezolution of Approval 0-2 oZ,-8-8-7 Pit Aq,on,.,e,.i,,da Highland Community Covenant Church, MY OF RANCHO CUCAMNU WILLMA.EMS PLANNING DIVISION 6642 CameHan Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91701 J UN I U 1987 980-5m Home ,Tune 10, 1987 City Planning Department City of Rancho Cucawnga 9320 Baseline Rd. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. Dear Sirs: We write this letter to request the granting of a Conditional Use Permit to Highland Community Covenant Church for use of 5542 square feet of space in the Rancho Pacific Business Park, 9230k Utica Ave. Suite 130, Rancho AOL Cucamonga, Ca. 91730. This s+ace will be used for offices during the week and for assembly on Sundays,, The use should be compatible with the other businesses -.tiering the facility due to our use of the space on other than peak traffic periods for them. Our primary time of usage will be between the hours of 8:30 a.m. 9.ad 12:00 noon on Sundays, with occasional small, group meetings #'not in excess of 30 persons) during the week. The space will be designed to accomodate approximately 150 persons in assembly in the sanctuary area, with classrooms designed to hold 15-20 persons each. With the approval of the Plennin3 Department and the Plaa-Ming Commission we will enter into a five-year lease with The Second R.G. Group. Highland Community Covenant:Church has been in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the last seven years. We have been occupying space in the Rancho Plaza Shopping Center frr the last two years and find that we neted larger space in order to grow to the point where we can afford to buy lemd and build-a facility for ourselves. We are as part of th(,Evangelical Covenant Church headquartered in Chicago, Illinois and a part of the Pacific Southwest I Conference headquartered in La Verne, Ca. Your cooperation in this matter will be gratefully appreciated. Sincerely, William A. EnnN, Pastor F, _. a � a r,.. IL ATI Rxxth 10 F NORTH RANCHO CUCNmONGA '�YTLEt LdC14Y'iClN �fl4P PLAIVNM T�VM1V' EXHWt•®• 5C:�1I.Et � �.`�'l��E3._ ri is a =° •'� -- "� BUILDING 1 � P ,:-.�' � u`R N ,7 n � -V�1•.� Y O N M In N � .�_ ti;udick •~ °a.•eami o w. _.•"0 4 100 1750.. . .. 03 o m N o N o a{ vg!.p. .� p 105 1680 t Yfl J �--�--- C IC t t i r� L iJ IF 1 I �`�j 3 `'•� o; cmaga - Y 1.15 'i HiThland Church -` 9UILL 5670, Ullu �Ql 7 140 2240 105 1fi9Q B.LLDING 3 lA5 16so F, + Spec. E _ J T 110 1680 150 1750 '. �,lls 16.8 out DI 4 ;? c _ fl III n u a�� rr o 9 ,. �.a (9! :° u.Oi I 4 N O v+ O q N E 4 N p ,� C qq o I rG 120 4161 w d i l � LiLLaL F,. Sixth Street RaachO P'Ll"0111c Ousiness Park tAA" rIC SCSNB, INC. aLDr 1 - 20.340 of BLD2. 2 - 18.690 of F,LDG 3 - 10.530 xf SLOG 4 — 30,440 of 4� v NOM CITY CF ITEM- c 1 gs ,�'a•2 nrlEt • 77711 w ar4L .yr.4#4 -4 a4" life d` ass r mis �. Ts NIX —Clip 117-13, r S.+l'1.'M DI V M7M I+l1.SI1Lti3 f- a SCAU.'. r n RESOLUTION NO. a �•r<. A RESOLUTIOM� OE�`l't,�E"(ii4tICN0 +CUCAI�ON FL �11NG COE�AISSIOFi APPpOYI�i6< COti0l�T1Qh0AL �U,SE PER+�1I N 87 'm`� FAR �iIHLAF?.r C(; 1NYTY 009 AFIT rCUftQi� CDeR1�+ - ''92r3JUTII:I*'AVENI�E Y SUITE Z30>iHE'GENERR�. INDU$TRTRL DSTRICT :plBAf xl APN 2O9-4T 1-I'7. r PacifiS, en the lath day of Jun�e�, 1987, a complete applin itiS�n was filed by Pacific Soeno;'1 dorporated for rreView,of the.a bove-descri'6Ed pre►�ect; and WHEREAS, on the fth day of du ; 1.987 the Ran'c0,0cammon.ga punning Cafissic��'held a public har�itngo can idea the above*=desoMied pr3et: NOW; THrREFORi;- thi Rancho Cu caaonga plal.king Camq�isaTon resolved as follows: , SECTION 1:` That the fol',14i no ffindings cap_!ae lbet, L` That the proop§ed use'is in,accord with th.6 General i PI an. the ob 'ectives g'F :the�DeVelopMent,A.cde:, and loce edposes of tb district in which tnli site i 2 That the proposed uso, together with the tandltlons applicable therett4, will not be detrfon'tal 'tu: the public health, safety, or' ,)fares, or. aterially injurious:. to prdpertfes or iaits in the' Vicinity.', proveoeri 3. That the proposed use cc� lies with %j � th each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. SECTION Z: That-this project will rot create adverse impacts on-the environmentan at a Negative Declaration is issued on July 8, 1987. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No, 87-23 is approved. subject tO_ffi_eT0_TTOwing conditions, I Any modification, expansion, or ogler change in operation, including day .care, will require a revision to the Conditional Us`,,,Permit. 2. Approval of this request shall not waive complAance with all sections of the Industrial Specific 'Plan, all other applicable City Ordinances and` any community or specific plans in effect at the time of . occupancy.. WWII, PLANNIING CCPi�fiSSEON RESOLUTION NO. CUP N 23 PAC, FIC SCENE INC. July 8, 1987 h r Page 2 i ,i .3. ;N11 signage proposed for this Conditional Use Permit shall be designed in c.nformance with the. City's fA Sign Ordinance and sha1Y require review and approval by the Fanning Division prior to installation. 4. If, the operation of this Conditional Use Permit causes adverse sf°ects to neighboring businesses, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for their review and Fpssibler ter.%fnation of the use: 5, Plans shall•,!be submitted to and approved by -the Foothill Fire Departut and Building and Safety Division for their review and approval prior to the isiuonce of building permits. Said plans _hall inciode• A a. A seating diagram for "a sancteary with the type of seating illustrated. b. The proposed use for each room, including ages of children using each room. 6. The building shall not be occupied, except for church office activity, until .:.completion of all improvements required by Building and Fire Codes to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division and Foothill Fire Protection District, -further, the building may be used for religious assembly and other large group (W persons) activities on Saturdays and Sundays and after 6:30 p.m. on weeknights. 7. Preschools or schools are not allowed by this permit; however, this shall not preclude nurseries or Sunday School during the hours of religious or group assembly. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 87H DAY OF JULY, 1987. PLANNING COW' 104-OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. r > tT-,--Cna1 rman V ATTEST: Brad uller, epu y ecre,.ary f" MWig & Page 'w n I, Brad Bi7a {'r2y' ryp�rin See n of he P7a nfi�tg Caamissior► 4f tne, C ty of 7S t 1 3. r Ranel o G ca o a o f *� a xRtte afaregon�gReo`1i�oadirlare nd 9aly�irYodtbrie�laMn�fng, iE oe of ='the , s City-ofi� ne aye �a��aeetti#fig act h`e 'P#lran ing� ioh.n.e�d on t 'e,: liv AYES; R NOES: G1MT,5 ONER5 ABSENT: COFfI?SSIlERS: '1 Adak 77 T7 CITY OP RANCH©CUCAMONGA � STAFF REPORT Q I F h . DATE: July 8, 1987 1977 TO Chairman and Members of the Pia-fining commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner. BY. Nancy Fong, Associate Planner o SUBJECT: ENVIRO E;iI'Al: 11SS $MEti€�.LEHD t3EVE4,Ok SENT R6VIE: BARWE a, developRR!Intat a Z .39 acre muted use, Master 'Wan corisisttng of a 14 acre Medt"al Office end 25.,39 arr-e. Admiinistrativel7rofessional Office in the,IndustriaA rri hk District (Subarea 7), Tocatedr-on the north .side of Citric Center Orive between Wite`0ak 'Street and Red.Oak Street APN: 208-351 2 ,and, 26. Related to this project is the request to amend the Rancho Cucaonga Business Park Master Plan by redes4,9natirrg the subject site from Corporate Plaza to Medical Office and Adainistrative/Professional Office, and the deletion of the public street connection through the site area. ENVIRONMEEX ASSESSMENT -AND CONDITIO&AL USE rrRNIT 87-17 UAKIUM/LVIVIAMMI'AA, n-deve iwnt o a buildlng5 medical office complex totaling 197,000 square feet, with Phase I being a 3-story 54,000 square foot k medical office and ambulatory care center on 4 icres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7), located at the southwest side of Eucalyptus Street and Red Oak Street - APN 208-351-25. (Related file: Parcel Map 10696) T_. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: 1. Approval of modification to approved Rancho Cucamonga Business Park Master Plan by changing the land use designations of Corporate Plaza and Light Manufacturing to Medical 'Office and Administrative/Professional Office. 2. Approval of modification to the approved Master Plan by J deleting a public street connection through the Corporate q Plaza. 1 ITEM G Pt:f giwa e�_,, 'gMS F R�PQRT . CUP' 87-17 4�0-OWN.'Itimental Health. Jul y 8,g + 3. Approval of a new_W acre Master Plan for the site are'. 4. Approval of ,a. 14 acre Master site'plan For a medical cam tft pus aonsisg offou:phases. 5. Appraal ,of dptall site plan and elevations of Phase I � . deve3,`apraemir. ' B. surroundiin�nand Ilse and Z'6inin . Ro aja,4jj `arr7 uraet Industrial Park Ditr-c ,Subarea ? South Yaca�, F,,iture post offiL s. Industrial park District l. Slubar�ea��z�• East - Vacantfiwijt�i approved projects'f:Qr'an 18-55^acre 00YU4at.' sta4strial Bui dings !Taster Pla�rd a 9-15 acre=mitts Tenant,industrial, Master'Plan; Industrial Park� istrict Subapma. 7 West 8fffico bu;lding, 1 'trial buildings; Industrial Park Difstrict^SO* s7 C. General Plan,Deli n�ss ,- ro ec �e us r a"Park North - Industrial Park South e Industrial Park I,; East Industrial Park J West -'' Industrial Park =i D. Site Characteristics: The 35 ncre site is vacant and rough grdueu. vegetation consists of native grass and weeds. All exterior streets are imp, ,ved except for the, driveways and parkway. F E. Parling Calculations.. (For Phase I developmt^it of the 14 acre medical c ex aap T i Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Re fired Provided Medical office '54,000 1/200 ;270 270 F. Applicable Regulations: A medical/health care service requires s a conditional use permit to be reviewed and a�proved by the Planuing Commission within Subarea 7. �� ;R�,,-. , �``+�. T�s^�,,,�.F---- r-*,cT,�^'',�i° ' '•q�k �.:q '+'°w*T*T,Tx_ e� 77 t- Ri h1I'li Gis,IOHq TAW,REPOR Urfa CUP DT-IZ - Sari Gbnti°nental'Health i 4 r f A. General: ,7he dq% lope0,Yis;PMPOsing a-39 ac re*ter Plan with a m xe, dse �_" 00cel offfce4 and, adoinistrat te(professionaT OffNO izot Ue� ,ha s Of_ this Master,, Phan wi '1 be developed as a me ica s con ist iW, of 4'ph ases'�t}tat°fnblt�dx t k 3-.,. story mtietidltadbu?latory tare, a si le, sttveny aid= bed l=ow€ auy facility-�andd a �4-story 140 bed hospital. ' Continentaa'tnagnt Vste , lint. is the develgper of this tared3oaii o ►pus� f^Exhibit "Af' it a dotaited descrfptis of the typd ,of� fa, 1 ty.,provided fn each of the phases of Ws. _. pro3rect. Due to the inter-reta;ionship of the Master Plan, Phase l ' development, and parael',�raapy staff review[ is focused on the land use designations /1nd the conceptual site Plan whin► establishes general' h ilding pad areas, parking arras., circulation an, tack 'phase,pedestrian connections, e of devel opment would be sub ec P- ;_ epaN ai =development review ny miodification propuse��; :o file Master Plan would be while z subject to Planning Comeission review. A related parcel neap is also oeing considered by e PUAning Goymission at this meeting. A separate staff;'report has beefs included for your review. B. Design Revie Cowittee• The Committee (CtJtiea, 14cNiel, eman) on June TW*-1937'reviewed the proposed 34 acre luster Plan and determined that the design of the Muster Plan lacks cohesiveness and fntegration In the orientation of building clusters,, interconOttion of buildings and interior circulation patterns,. The Cowmittee stated that the Muster Plan should be revised to address the following concerns; 2. Provide a pedestrian r,pvironment through the use of plazas and walkways that shoOd be integrated into the overall land use design. 2. Convenient pedestrian walkways should be provided tolink parking area, buildings and pedestrian open space. 3. Provide a stranger interior vehicular circulation pattern that strengthens the integration of the Muster Plan layout. 4. Building orientation ,site layout, and building forams should include cons..i:,.ration of wind protection. Pe.AfllilN6 OQa!lIS`SLE REPORT 'DR 87 t2S=iQdt' % liP 870, `17 Y`Barton/,�ntrt�ental He 'th �.� July 8, 1987 I g Pa e 4 C2 The Committee stated Viat the revised Master Plan 'should be submitted_for juty , g1,50!,r=.egolar.Design Review Committee meeting +y, pr�jor to PTsanni i � tl. i�i n< .r � . Since duly 3, 1987 is a holiday+, the recor�flati�on � from ether pesgn„ (ieYiew C�mittee review on Jt67y 198:7 would n it refi,eoted�'Crt this report. A suppligmental report w ,�eeoaaoen +tiins from *the,.Design Review Committee will be 1441..abl�e and,delivereufdr your y eview prior to �i the hearing. The Committee 'a+, this mee*d,.al,so� .reviewed tbe. 14 acne medical campus and the Phase;rl devi opment,and recom*jided approval with the following impra'veiaentss 1. The develtoper should short hart the; parking lot design and the edgetj$f the property boundary could tit modified to be consistent with the overall 39 acre Master Plan. 2. A conceptual design,=of thie large- central i zed ;plaza area including a phasing pT'e�tr for• the construction of this J plaza shoal-d be submitted for Comkitteekreview along with Phase 11 : the.`hospftal development subakfttal. 3. Safe and convenient pedestrian pathways with textured treatments should be provided throughout the site. 4. TPxturized pavement such as in9ockir+g brick pavers should be provided at the two ci,,.75? driveways. S. The service for ,e=rq:nc. vehicles and loading facilities should be screened with Tndscaping. ba The developer should work with staff in the final design- for Phase I main driveway entrance from Spruce Avenue to the satisfaction of the City Planner and City Engineer. y 7. The landscaping theme and the density of the landscaping materiaS�w should be consistent with the approved Rancho Cucamonga Business Park and City Standards. 8. Convenient pedestrian connections should be provided from Red Ptak Street to the building entrance plaza area. 9. The office entry of the east elevation should have ac more dominant statement through the addition of pop-out balconies and/or the extension,faf columns to the second stories. I Wn PGWWK S` >S7°IIFF,;REPORT OR - �i CUP 87.1 a t BartonCConti�ental He th July 8,`,298T" - .Page 6 �.% L) ' q, Exhi.l s E rthrough I do not ref~l eqt the,ch Teges, revised:e�Aibits R will ba 0O.Videct'"d tk IVered fgr ym regtis:9i, C. Envir n T Assestment: Staff has completed` part II of the nv roen o, ec , s atsd hasetiined� they the duel opment ., of this 3g' acre �laStir Plan' inc9°uding the acre mgdical campus. and Phi develop ent +�ou1d not create a signifi cant impact tow�thtw envi'roftent. If the Cosa�iss on coh,G.urs with 4 staff findTngs,?, the issuance of negative declaration waitid be in order. III. FACTS FOFI FI I^tRS,, In order for the Planning Commission to approve s acre Master Plan, the 14 acre medical campus1.and Phase'I development, facts to the support the following findings must be made.. L Thalir the proposed project is_ consistent with the objectives of the General 'Plan and the Industrial Specific Phan., 2. That the ,proposed use is, in accordance with ge objective the Industrial Specific Plan and the purpose of the district in which the site is located. 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with +each of the applicable provisions `Of the Industrial Specific Plan and the Development Code, 4. That the proposed use, together with conditions applicable I thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements within the vicinity, ARkSPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Daily Report newspaper as a public hearing, notices were sent 76-a1 ,proper y owners within 300 feet of the project site and the properff posted, Y. RECOMENDATION, A recommendation from staff is pending Design Review Gommltt2e review of the revised plans on July 2, 1997. Staff will provide a supplemental report that includes: recommendations from the Design Review Committee; recommendation from staff regarding the pr000sed Master Plan and the medical campus including Phase I development; revised exhibits; andN Resolutions of approval for both the Cooditional Use Permit and the Development Review for your review prior to the hearing, an�nent l' 'Heal th g k Resp iYO s e ` Fry , AFrvc Attachiii�nt . Z`ifibi�tr"� '� i`3�e. d 0,16bription of the 4-�pre y � (i 1h �1V 5ltept�p"and- ,�a5+e� Nero`�ta�at P'O�an . F:rthis it °F" - Propo0,d 24-1 a Mfa�ster� t�.-Pl r� for Exit bi Phase :Sit Landscape, aIan �l Exh bit "ii" - Phase I Elreatans Exhibit "I' - Ph Flaar Phan - I 71 i Mom, - a IL ,;: din :.N.'at :� _�*, .W. �sZa.�.:aE....:euy: .r• .. :. �l 7 A annsd medical acre ica use Planned "medi.tal mall" within the 39.39 acre master all campus of Rancho Cucamonga Business Park. The pproject will be developed in four phaxas as described below and lit the attached CHMSjnbyco package. A three story medical office building consisting of 27,008 square feet of office space for use by Physicians, Dentists, Pharmacists, and other medical spacialists 'and 27,000 :square feet of Diagnostic and ambulatory care containingx-Ray outpatient surgery, laboratory, cardic diagnostic, and nuarological services. Building brA.=' s gill be based upon the individual doctors however the center is not envisioned to be. open Past 7e00pM. Any patients of this facilityrequiring overni ' t eta will be tracritical. car*a wnit wi11 be estaablieshe funetic�n Similar to a A single story, 50 bed, 30,000 square root xraw Acuity Facility for Datients requiring overnight accomodations (approximately 1 to 5`days). The facility will be predominately hospital beds with their necessary-support services including 2 surgical rooms. an x-ray facility, and those services generally found in In-Patients Hospitals. If necessary an Emorgency Zoom facility will be provided. as k• A three story medical office building similar to Phase 1 using approximately half of the building for Sports Medicine/Rehabilitation Services. Phase q: A four atory, 100 bed tower containing traditional hospital functions. The specific uses will be determined in the future based upon the needs of the community, the doctors tnval�ed, and the general growth of the area. kcrillyf�F rmm_ �' �j dot mrmrcvcxv EXHWt .sc = a �nr gR .t 3 •, T wino l Noum IMP � � � � �'�MO�1�YNtiNIGNNGLYR' III 1 ,lie g Y doofti2FO0 3fMAV NMVH 5 , i tt r L fEJ ., sue, �.i��:r._ _� � pk• ti. 3 O EQ i cc LU -16 r a d ' r 11 iY. a• �uWM�M1�•\vN.\lv �Il\Ua. Y+a+�se+i.w:..%c .• �• . 7 f �; •• ►• , .t'. ! i bt Y: .• •� r Q T / 4 �~ Z�Z }w L tip ,.� „�,, • i M. •••- Y�°0wt � W ` o f P® 4 � t FS pp WNW mum44 e lip sse• i � re p a it Y r it Al z r Man CD 1_ It s r r, "�?�Ali :�-•---'---^� // +--�•�.---��" ��t eolt It" t ` •. � of R PLAZA v SUMMARY e- FtusE 1 s OFFICH'S SAM aS.F. a x. .Fuses 13 so ems 3OLMO asp.zst PIVSE 3 9 SiOfiY►�EOttA OFFICES 54.000 aSF loc p ¢I1a V PIUSE 4 4 S1CA`C 10C egos $2.000 a&F,.3.55 im ` ; -• ` TOTAL PMKM1li PROV W � .' i.0[ TOTALPAAIttaREaJRWMY OF �' If ��, � Ifll• i -t , TmArt= • RANCM CUCA 7TM: 1 PEANNt1.`TCi DIVIROv EX 'r '' SC.AtE= • ,;,., � W SUMMARY LAND 4.00 AC. y' AMBIMATORYGENTER,�,18800'a MEDICAL or,-ICES RRE6..,..OAK y�EEr TOTAL �`V N EAahteaw --..,, R t PARKING PROVIDED ST; W STANnARD 179 ST -- i COMPACT 134°A1 ,,.93 ST.' +1 HANDICAPPED 4 STAI PARKING REQD, 270,ST LANDSCAPE PROVIDED 22% I f LANDSCAPE REOCARED 15% Naw CR e.c• O _..yaaa�e 4Wi r. u>t 1JL �A R�E� s � -- Co I C NOM MY OF RANCM cucA _ o . LA[7ii71 S ��. r, -*1- All i TM-1777' aI ;1PILL SECC CN_ 3 f i E EMVATaJ i NXXU H MY OF � �. RANUD RANrQM tci-err= b)i4y � t i r:4 WAY.Lam AU Lcm I Arm""AAQMXWMMXMT IMAMS Yam• OPIC( Run JAX F LMft,mmm G O O M.now PLAN PH `Y CF jvm --- — CITY of RANcHQ GuuxoNGA` ; STAFF REPO,,-.IT � 0 Z i ' DATE: July 8, 1987, _ 1977 d TO: Chairman And-Members,,of the Planning Commission FROM: Barrye R.. tansonr, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Barbara Krall,, Assistant Civil Engin,"r ' SUBJECT: 1A- EzS�StB AND TiTAT PARCEL 'Mp,P 305.96 - p +3 L N Asia a v sbio3cre— ' an Y30 , N: Es F,n the Indus. H41 Park Deveto�telst District, sr�b rrt*a,� Spun i#, by Whit�'�ak Avenue, Red Cak . Street aid v kcaCerita>,4rive (APR 2 1-Z5 26) I. PROJECT AKO SITE OESCRJPT'Ta(: A. Action Re_k eisted: Approval of the proposed Centative"l�Parcel Rap as s awsi oiti s_xhbi '"S• `;l B. Pargt7• Size: Par( 1 4.' S �� ! Parcel 2 9.954 Parcel 3 25„388 Total 3 C. Existing Zoning: r Industrial Park., subarea 7 of the Industrial Specific PlanI D. Surroundin land Use: North -" vacant- South - vacant East - vacant4 West - Existing Industrial Park E. Surrounding General P"ian_and Development Code Designations: north Industrialarc, Subarea 7 South - Industrial-'Park, Subarea,7 East - Industrial mark, Subarea 7 West - Industrial Park, Subarea 7 F. Site Characteristics: This site is vacant and slopes in, a southeasterly direction. ITKA 4 J qXs .fi 4G.".f 5" °. P1ann3ng CoWissfen:�tW Report PM IO696 Barton bivil'ohmeft,.Co:Pag ly Ju8 198 II. ANALYSIS. The purpose df thfi"s,°parcel map is to cr°eate three separate parcels. The k Master Plan for the par&eel: map .axea i~s �°on tonight's agenda as OR 87-25, � A medical complex is ptopo``SO P4,ce�[s 1'&�` ` and is also on tor, girt s agenda as CUP 87-17, Tfie first Fivase of dey.el,opmeGt will occur on P'ak�o61 1. 11 The public streets ad 3.acent to the parcel'° map area are< already improved with the exception .off, parkway i�mprovgVnts which are..r-_eguired td 4e c"pleted upon,developpent of each pare ",, III. ENVIR01MENTAL REVIEW; The applicant dompleted Part I of the Initial may: t`—a a con ted a field investigation and compl,etea Part lI ' of the Initial Study. No adverse itppatcts upon the envi'roment Ave ` anticipated as a result of this pr�Seet. Therefore, issuani S Negative Declaration is appropriate. IV. CORRESPONDINCE: Notices of Public Hearing, have been sent to ({ surroun. ng property owners and Placed ini- the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been completed, V. RECOMMENDATION• It is recommended thata_lthe Planning Commission cons I ddr--aTMnput and elements of the Tentative Parcel Map. If after such consideration, the Commission can recommend approval, then the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, Barrye R Hanson Senior Civil engineer BRH:BK:dh Attachments: Vicinity Map (Exhibit W') Tentative Map (Exhibit aSw) Resolution and Recommended Conditions of Niproval r Jf•I[G PAR,I .�+ia7t`EL .kW/ TlKf .. ul 1 y. R — v� ! ✓ s F e � t ly �' (�IH114 4V[ Y' ` f.KK CfalT/F C6 .x4_ 1 1!Al. 74S4 . na ele+►A{s� » elm _ .. R s :srZs � .. <,..,. 1 r VIE LAwahLt P1618 y�1�.3 rye st t�a o :L rci 1: — Z r CITY OF ; PAIRML ENGDammG DrimoN ]EX A�s� r TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. I0696- IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF q SAN @ERPIRDINO, STATE Of CALIFORNIA. [csua A otvaarwz cP rawcv.s eW!•AMc[l wu no ohs. at _ PM MAP A[Oofto[D ara§one&T or/"MU waft.#Aw.ry•. ' Y, �' ' ♦1'PIBtIl1/7. Lwa�':lLv+l• mc=wlw or[A20 CCU tt•r CAK so- 'h. a �K ref Jr e,. • •,1' p.1 • /"� ]f t.V. y." i t .. +•�.t•sA.w re f ' .. ... Ar- 3e4 Ac. as Sob 4c. its- 1" § P• ! � i;+ Any°o•`(� �:�iY T�It M ! • A..s.aa ^uk�• z z.s.r• r„�g� W. ✓;�zv `t RED' OA% A1C4:tukA1T up*+\5.. �" SA5�3 O•8[AR•t•k(y .wP.A•.{A•'f°Y6 Z-we..r rYs�; P 4 A 1{1P.+Mn••[° —.{9aa{+A°o•�••.4{wwaYc eewhP •�• !if•°{•K ww• •N•M;4N M•OP•M�. PWY�+M•h•tiY.•fr•.RCi'•Q 1PT,•Mtt Iaaa{D 1..f 3°{{• 1•AatP+YOM1^J W y CMYMrv.laa.•AaaY4•.r.{y[a0 APa' T•P[iww G•:PaAYhyA•p:.y.l.if L `77 :k f .� 'z. .' J:/. 't, . q,f ' 7: S' zl 3ESOL TION No. A RF.SOLUI ON OF l•HE� PLANN4 Gi. C�MISS114 OF xi i� CITY OF RANCHO CEiC�MCdGAr 4ql.f A, OONOITIONALLY._ ApPROVtIMG TENTATIVE PARCEL-AAP N1.(, 0696 r� WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel: M.ap, Number 1069c �ftted`A,bY, Shcc�bn Development Company, aPFl pane,fori the.�purpose f.sty`,` }I,nto 3,parcels, the real ,property saituat-d i�n�the City of Rancho , ,ra_ Cou y of San 1 Bernardino, State of C4,ali6 hi7a, identified as ON(s)-��.� � & 26;. �ti<tund'ed " by White Oak Avenue Red Oak.,Street and C'i-vic Cent_ �� 3 WHEREAS, o'h fly <i3, 1 7,: ti ;t$lanning�Gc i;sion held a duly advertised public hear :)g for t abos-e le.,& bed mad Lnu>.THEREFORE, TIE: RANCHO CUCA�MGA Plat; � G COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FCILLOWS. tN _ r SECT? 1: That the following findings have been ,made: r. 1. That the map is consistent.with the General P'ta►, x= 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. s a. That the site is physically suitable for \the. proposed development. t 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will F not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or ha!A. ddv6se affect's on abutting property. aECTIOLY 2i That Tentative Parcel Map No. 1G06 is hereby approved subject —to-7-Fe—attached Staneard Conditions and the following Special Conditions; 1. Notice of intention to form and/or join the Tigl:ting and landscaping District shilT he filed with the City council prior to recordation of the map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8th DAY OF duly, 19$7. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ;IANCHO CUCAMG4GA E?�f L.drry T. McNie . C F1rman ATTEST: 9 Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary 71� _ T� 71F.ad �Bu� e t uek F CRietgyu<�rg�ty .. a `o u e ng Y yec d e,e a hoapL e�e�tug SS' f �asn "19 �a i 4idbregoi gRA eds o9s r'ou�p66Falu oKC on'te 8a` of , f s t e q Cri1s AYES: ' Ffi fi ;.: ROES�. Cos�� s ABSENT COtRPTSI��NR; P[ , r , c gg yy fyt`� L.� Yi�•i b� �M�q„ �,Y v� y gal. �@ ig Ipm B JA 1!. 0 _ Y a c N1�J w ut pit •. j�. W 1 �� `�, •e �b S.I of �. u 4 I � I 711 j� �I is yNO zv E lit S� �s sa. 4 w lit 9•. V.. 'W �' �L_. �M �r` 1i d � y{v ��y,� �L ��. YW{•.M,y�s y► M O NY � M � �I V 4 � t� a4"�dQB RJSm, wu Z u.�.a sd,M i r '42 JE m. d�i v g3 e� gba tk, 'O+ k G to a sa ms U a � r y� C it a L M CQ N6 N� �i S �6In N � die O�y MCN ��a 9eJ � W M� O)N � � �JpS Lp�■6� bS p1��e � -m ` n LV CV d V A N uq atr. 06. n P .17 771 a CITY OF-RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM 1-4 O , 1977 DATE: July '% 1P07 TO: Chaff?? nand Member ' s of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Piarner SUBJECT`. ENIiIRQNi TA9, -W ESSKENT_ 'ACID TEKT,ATIYE TRACT 133I�8 v FiA:_ o;a .res � en- a erne°opment o e g een l T p s ng c family 1 ots r-Qn five (54): acres of 1 and:<i n the Lowensity Residential District G2:4 dwelling units per acre , located. A the 'Sautheast .earner of Herpmsa Avenue Y and Manzanita Drive - AP,Si: a -182-2 I. PROJECT ANO SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested;_ :Approval of subdivision design, site plan, concep uirl gra-fin-g plan, building elevations and issuance of a Negative Declaration, B. Pro3ect Densgt 3.6 dwelling units per acre, C. Surrounding, nd Use and Zonin •• or in"gle-dam y resYN-241al (under'constructjon), Law r Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units fur acre) South Vacant, Low Density Resident4r,(2-4 dwelling units per,acre) j Evt - Single family residential (proposed), Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Single family residential, Very Lour Density Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) D. General Plan Designations: Project e - .ow ens ty Residential•(2-4 dwelling units per acre) North - Low Density Residential (2-4 Lielling units per acre) South Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 dwelling €inits per acre) ' i E. Site Characteristics: The site is currently vacant with a 6-7% slope from nor o south. ITEM I PLAl3NIltG COliS3Q STT11FF REPORT " TT 1332$ Ma -fpeti Via' 5, July 8, 1987 Y Page Z A. General,, The applicant is proposing to detelop 18 single " 7aMTTy-rots ring ig in siz6'`from, 7AO .s'quare feet to 14,300 square Meet in a?r65 with an ave'rag� -Tot.. of 9,.Vt square feet in area. The'applsi'"cant is, also proposing 3 two-story floor plans., each with -three elevations. B. Desi n .Reyewamaaittee: do June lE, 1987,"the DesxignFReview omm ee ��mer; c ,, 'Iratoy; and liuli er) ,reviewed the p"ropo§al and recoawerde'd°approval �ubect to'the following conditions: i. , A si,�C foot:hi gh..decorati ve 61 xk wail shoo?d be provided an aY; four p`rimeter boundaries. Th.e wall should be designed to be' oatible'with the wall for Tract 1QtiZ7 located to the north and-east. 2. Wod&,trim or plant-ons with stucco over should be provided arouhd all -Windows. 3. The units should be designed to include a. bonus rood and/or variation in the placemelt of`'single and double garage doors. The bonus room should :incorporate windows or some other architectural feature to provide visual relief on the r front elevation. 4. Additional :use of brick should be incorporated into these units that are proposing brick on the garage facade. The additional brick Work should be used 'between single and w double garage doors, across the front Oft' the living area, and on the.chimneys. 5. Additional dedication should be provided at the northeast corner of the site. The area should be landscaped to provide a .smoother, transition with the landscape area to the east. 6. Where poss41e, two-car drive approaches sho;;ld be` provided, flaring out to three-car drives within the lot. D. Environmental Assessment: Staff has 'completed the nv ropmen a ec s and found no significant adverse environmental impacts as a result of this project. If the Caaftsion concurs with these findings, the issuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order if the Tentative Tract Map is approved. E�iM1N �r "k REP oMt. Aa p� e d v �eQtTII F o t 7 �a r .. ro3 , `with th aii[d ^� measures � l MAIor ddausw p oeif a e set s►i�ro t ' ac s In and fi;on recorn�en end bp+ v a � ol a a wi, �e, " x aPP ca�I R,p Y ions' of v' pin, C6a c �i d IV. CBR.BE ese , e9'nt aXyget _erA — a e' s ;a u eaz ar�d4n iced were use a p—rop�er�tyP t mes Y. REQOEF�QIl[Y�6N� �ta r command's a=P1��nring 3iGoa�mi�ssin yap vex A of°B, ti lF- o'opdiapprosta�l ID) ,�tii` 'Brad B 'e"r. City anne'. '. BB:SM:uc r .. .• ' a Attachments: Exhibit "A*r Site lft`� i.�atior�P`�an, EExhi'bita1/B' Teiu t�lle,'TF,ac i�fap Exhib "0* Gi�j�s°e Plena _ W bit"PE" _ ui7 3t�`g: l �ratiocis Resolution�cf Approval�witi Ggn�eitions - m L � 5 a M Z-- ^fe h NA i / 1 I �\ 6 -- f NIP CITY0 RANCHO `CUCAMQNGA FLAMImo' MOON EXHIBMMT= � ----- s T N IV L 'e Jam. IN fn Y' i Q) O CITY or. ► L° 1fi�?iti'C�l. qTLE. .fir (..ra �t r• a ��- �- � - i � _ f t �� • ' [ 1p JU CITY Or. PLANNING DrVISM n 3. . a �. - � • j � Diu. '_ t, ,rP ®sGxiE;.._.. M .�,.2,�,,,.��•z-..'� """'�'t"'.' "�T'�'�pR"ffi � ;„�� .,ate„ � � --�:. .� ` s >} a 1 i • Y a ._ •' ♦ � III fin/+ r K � sad F,49 t� P E3 •� TO fa li KS t CITY or- 1 RANCID +UQI"MQ GA UNC M 6. �. �::' _ = � �'� �� .;,A ��i �,.� � ,ram a �� . � �. �i a , . � d<qn as � �e�mapat:�. � � ♦�F �� 5�` �� u..ei,� � t "� � �� ,® i � � y I®� ! �� 'i�tfP l'uIAN t. ® - ��i -=•��, s � �d - .. 1 1 � �1'M ilk wi _ � � 11k I � � �� !.'� �i' Y �; ' l� �� r ica, �' � � � _. •-'.A r r r g • .. Ft ��, �.�_. � � � lit. r, � �. Er. a ij 42. a 17 Air CITY ol;, UCAMONGA k i E%lqt� . Amh Vaift 'r44 ar _ r "r r E3 RANCHO CUCAIM(a-sr PLANNt txvtV >'�, L 4 Y� rl�"taagl �e{QG+LII E-. '� r 4 t i OWN t . r R'. ■ � � rigor i I_ r 1 x. J�. ;� l Ldt��pp:V .,- �y��. p IDR� �y�N�I �BnA� ��, g Lia�RA _I o4B �� 3•: A a.T¢ V� ��+p a {'X-. �` �. �� s ��,.:..� Y� ��;��. ' P :, �.,s.�a d l\ ASP B �- � - S ` t �:. :?. `' �� +' • -- { � � �' a i a �'� f Ii t \ � ,a 1 A t��-y' �� `� t . : - .. 'a IIl� y f� rear' t � ll � ra a sasses, I ■�l a .. '. ,r-�, edaoaaaarl y' ■11ill stNA t a_ll[, WHIR NMI `liihll t � { ' ;• .:fly' '' '�I..�.`J ?i.,+•S y.+ t ".-. rr ` a I a 77 g .. . A, ' I aRNIAP1 °4�ft1rT1 AL i ,P �AS'i l✓ L' N0� 2Q3 1$ AtID''OSS G�REa�d iK�ER t. kJHERF.�IS,+ Tyen, Tcaet , p eta Pi I�, ereia a€te Ma w itted� by Nayfilowe�r r q .d' Pi _ ' .a� 'ara for r ? as f"!subdi5vidi�' PP1+` "` ` t �r9�� tfle real ate h t o Cd qm ilo`I V ai` nee a diino . St a of C la iA or a as sY a� eden al i> t ar "9f fi c: s ihtto 1 theast� eo �sa Avep ,, naanita�'', Dris[e, reguT'a�r3�3r cs ¢ 7agrifi�g�C ssro f®r xpu ;,, fing and ;k �r action on Jsgy 8, l� n kNER�llS� th?z�itPl R iak,recommendedb approva�l,af the ►3ap suiiect • ''!�to all condi+ionsset�-loat"Ain'"i7n� th0. Engineering and �Pf4anning. °bi siorr',h repov ts,; afld;. ,rd En WkREAS, e lagnbng, Comrai'ssiron has read and c>ansideren ` i+e. ' presentedII S'N na;4ate .• g � anrppprrts ya has cos€sidered other eVfi'dence ' }}NOtii; IiER ti a I�a�rningr. i`ssio►/ of thi%'pity ,o€= Rancha ,Cucars�nga does keesso� e}as �o� ,,ss�a+s`: SEC A1 1:' The .lran 7., Gaomiortrxkes ether following findings in r regard to en_a 3 e Traet.<YdEo� 8 MO a Y?p-thereb ax— (a) The. to tat,,ve trac s co's-intent with "*he General Plan, l tev<��1'.opment tGode, end sipl, ns-; (b) The design are imgfty, pte is .Oif the tentative- tract is ' consistent aid, the ,General -ATan; Development Code,` ancL t specific plans; (c) The site ' is physically suitable for the type of- development proposed; (d) The .design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial'envift*-;atal damage and avoidable injury to humans and wii,dli'fe or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious Ublic health problems; (f) The design, of the tentative tract will not con,€lict`with. ;. any .easement a-qhi; ed .by the public at Targe, now of record,,, for-access -ugh or use of the property-wi1thin the proposed.subdfvis�fort. c; (9) That 'this pm-Qect 'will net=create adverse it ae�ts art he „ environment and a. lfpgati�ee,Decl:aration is Issued. -_ AM- v^ `7.ar'"CVE`vc�+;F hANNING CC iI� SIB it 0lda RESOLUTION NO. e na T t five 'Tact - 1 o ��..: � k�ayfl,.wee July,8, 198T Page 2 : SECTION, 2: Tentative Tract kip No. 13318�. a copy of which is attacirgd VVR6, s hereby.approved subject to all of the following conditions and Conditians: Design Myio: T. A six-,foot MghT decorative block wall shall b _provided on all" four peri*etter :boundal"ies. `The w,11 shati,.ae designed to be compatible with the wails-fior Tract:*Q8�7 i,ocated to the forth and last `�[he wa1�i det f s-shal l be'shown on the-landscape pl and - whiFchfshal)l'beyreviewed and approved',b/ the City Planner prior to the issuance of hliftaing',peiKts. 2. {flood trim or,plant-ons with stuco. over shall be provided around all windows, 3. The,)dwelling units shall be designed with a bonus room and/or variation in the placement, of sindf-e and double garage doors. The bonus room -sball incorporate windows or some other architectural feature to -pro.46 visual relief on the front a elevation.. Thee ravised ,p^`,-�„ ""s''hhall Wreviewed and approved by the'City Planner prior to the its of building permits. ' 4. Additional use t,)f brick shail,be incorporated into those units that are propcs'ing brick 4n the garage faeade,t The additional brick work shall be used i4tween tWe singT.e and double garage ` µA door, across the front of the living area, and. on the chimneys. The revised plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to, the issuance of building permits. 5. . Additional dedication shall be. required at the northeast corner of the site. 1111 area shall be landscaped to provide a smoother tra,�sition with_', he landscape area to the east, lase revised trdct asap shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner Prior to rec(irdati,on of the final map. 6. Two-car drive± approaches sha11 be provided at the street flaring out to a three-car driveway within the lot where sufficient setback is available. The revised plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building perrmits. Engineering: 1. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical), on the project side of Hermosa Avenue shall be undergreunded frog the first pole on the north side of Manzanita Drive to the first pole south of the project boundary prior to public improvement acceptance or occupanc; whichever occurs_ AOL first. 'Reimbursement of one-half the adopted" cost of, undergrounding from„future development as it occurs on the opposite side of the sUkeet is ntit feasible because the property is presently developed. Egg1 �tt� t�yy1,, 4 .' wr 8 a t11 50 m a� t s>` r i� o en b e e, e, o s q _ YPru t� 9e AVP PuN�II?�ti C htI�SS$0 ;�- nLar.'f T. .E `ez. ATTEST: ra lU ef, pu,y�� r.,e artd ff- i; Brat Buller, °oeputy , ► to y�o the Pl�Ann Colww f c% kti r t3f �� Rancho CucamangA, �o eby,c �e farga 'c Reolut�zo regularly, intradct ��eda �te$d Eby e a ��,ng Cod�aad sS6f=`=ate= City of'Rancho CucaenongA7,' At re e� ' ting$.Qr'the Plansil;ngd C�*tsti on !tie Sth day of''ja'�,y, 1�,A7, by;At e.fQlt�ing .Yoke-to- i s r AYES: CowlS,c,ONERS: NOES: CtlMMSI�I�ERf ABSENT: COMIS,S,1QNERS: C '11 v Iv $,, 'g L �,M§fit Y+�y qer ~ r� 3 � {6 v rq1 y A rr SY' k S rep . 4 �3.4y•r,r fir.Li R'u :YkC»~ p�y Z141 � ,I s , � C o �G � .Y..Y ra�o 05, ` . y1► r 3 1 1gyggg;��'''# �-Nil Mis Y,<,.. a^ C V• anti S�� i +�'�,,,� Y l4 3'r:- � a"r Y C r�l.w'� ,. +e l YA • 4 fY' '6 g$l, a �-.$ + �}. klS MMMt �rl� , �u, �f , z $ 1 �» . $� ► "iSg � �X .. s. X.»a`. . s 5 ^. <o■2 a Ag__ `d p�Y.• r"� Sp Ya 1?e� Y 3' Y1 *$a,r I � AC ��.+✓ N!m0 `+�ZI- N6�a ANY TNN ipp,Q� ¢ , ^YY3 g Y pL��(Ass gCR `=r p Gi�Ca``i eN w1� — 4 ^4 oa�. a$ o +: aa3L 2 yyNg� a ✓ g ~ pYg .....�'Y' S• ..`4,' g'st i'' UG7 rA$..�`rtN� • =°�cvg Eng„$ $er o`v� Y$s jg ✓A�� z eJa0 Zggnn - I-- g^°c3 Ru y .. ■ y g yp yy� Y •. 1FY his¢ �'^' Y Y d dA g �frz �PN i 1 g .--°°s �^xy2 'i g'eYQ r.7t/I g4 Y'�, •�u �3g.r.� fv+.Nw *'S .�� py� oz � a��w Ci�i✓+� �gb�� s `y� ;�„iii�� i.�a IAr. �"�Y, a0 ZY R < � s�3 � i '}•+N .$'+�i�.. W.ri' 's r3 :c N:iS3 Div �. Sro 6y 'J�i 8y�¢ �Vn ^y � ^^4 w��y�Q�i�✓ ✓C� � Y.11 f':. a Y14 1' d ��S 13YLb Q.� i W �Sw 'q f�i✓. YbpH.ye�\ VA� +V 1�'✓6 NL LUN=-� ^�1 LN!$ Yy � y YYY 4,p 23 jY $ N �.✓Js 9�C �,' lag a -11. �aCY QY ~6 �� •w ��N V��Y�at �y�i� �NNI.�f � ✓-• Yp'fL� A Ad s�.Y.. i �.. W i NY'N~p' LyM Q> .. � a s Y r-x ► go _g g Qg ` t x a1 AIR 11r YYg N� __s .fig`. ``€aYa�k = _M y� qO�C�aii� V11;1 Qil Zia, LWL Ya^a �L•�a N ,�•y'—aYa .14 ` wil— ems fix um 32 Sg ig•_ g4=g.L3i c y✓ N15 Ow i 8 g�c: �iTrg log � a✓ ✓q� .c rg�N Q rgQ►- fit �o .e` ps L NOQ g avi s''b s �.$Y}��."i "' g( >iYi="g YpLw'b`Ou a O�rn Y ■ �. � py yp.► .dt Q YMYIY _T. �.11v�»^up tQj'i?q fl ` .P T �L —Wuv I.Vg� ate^ A�tAYYW Y Ya YM YOL�su < ssa •.Mn rrNa i-R-A 't; iu �.sai ' ±w= ��`:' Op s 4� 14, `.��r =ii�- °` '�q'r'� 'rk�` '�``Y eig`.`vQg ,5C$w tlIyyyys�uG �� » P Z.• �i. O� . emu Fzz Z. C]I m:YO 'cw 3 g tC.m $ E $ate''-'yak CC3 4 0 w .M�r�� 'pL{gFtw 1.. Z M P`I tY= Yam=N + C��l Y W.w Yi g.(� .+N 33� L} �. g �I 'PL •tl�Y O Mli y�v i'siAr e �y ri O P 0 • 't� 4 y fie oY �+s eo s $ a j'« ;�fi :a } �.r.�l. I�tl `$ r.0� :C rrL+�M� V etli 5�i/If'~.,.`a"+.i w a s - raL`o$ v ■ 'nr w i e 2.4 alpl s N ;'= y r L$g Sew Zr �$i g� y is i�*U4 _ 96 ,'� $. w� » y.•r i .�.ir"i...'di wfi �'•'jj'� {grk 9 ,�i. �.wow»` �CI� �S r�� HV�.. MS=U .Vu• • '� �� ` �N�F�� r. V ■w� � �M�y, y ^ Z. E.P'V=jai g.=any 8• q G ` • 4p ,N M = Yak S== —Y3 Omid �� i • i A g .g. pi P w M i'j. 1 p ^; �S # �� ir �Isf- 7�C� C.Q y^C�Ii tlt��P�IL SS .0 VR g6 fi fiS „ r . fid o 3q t3^ �Z fi3. � 4Y w T 4-2 IS x s w p G� y g 0 yr �u;a 6 ► i �qeY�y p C Y! ►yam (y� Y ice,,.. pb tr• O Y�'Y 2 3. N ►^ .r �� C •n _ �5� 9� CM �O YiVLU r_I��. w 9, Y N�qr�. .. 3-" • ZZ H'i Z 2 Jssrs irz- 2.2ml.� a Al 't 11 MN O N n�i Y 4 M LI @L \a Qw jY.aA.. 'wV yasiq yV IS a182 �Y s �yy + a� $�.6V� : s a»•� »Ic �€ uI. =- MBA Yff QJ gal Is agA t yQittr 1 N{M�i{ +r 4i 4 Ey All EL L9 'F war 2w—•'r �M• lf' L%1: EtlZE S Iag 8"�a �tYxr'v _ Ate.LUZ 1r1 9 �.rd�u»¢1 't s �.= ..G». .ca3 OVM.� y M. 3uls `a.r.e m L jai.,23 g� tj ZZ ZZ NNWa71 a lb lit Z If d a7G ' t. iN .Sw�L $ ., "fib Is ZZ r wggYt gas ol of IL zlxt j�c""��' �� r s ■f t � a � s rr « Y NrI a v •c-•`t c� N. `.Y .�._M a i-12N lt,u t' S Mom«.` WSv� WY� �IL V�Y\ L�r ai• YC Dt� �� C.. � � �V. �Y 1 t 4r ,, •r x �� '•vim � ®. �5. aA.�'M Vim. � S p I GO � +: Y y�y.Y'� f�,•�'��' M N� F�.b.��., i � Q 1y o � q-V'� �� e ry �' \ w Y�. ��: 6 � �i Y��: > • ci �!Y[ �,- �,tip, If 47 Qj ff zL`rC EX D- °`� IN ! �y4 $ gw n ,$+n ilk 2 4-10 No �'o- in'd o coi azMw'�::v 44--1 :9,�r� ,• �� ` 'E� �� Ash r rN Y V Q _NO Ytl NUw•C NO ... a b L 'e Y K w w �r d•yy UtJ4 I G4i Anf S� 174 oz TJ it gas 01 ��, aC: ay. � .cs. � ��n. �Z q• v yc i 4H a +y+ n Y ' ~► gal �ha 5 s K g V tl V "a r p M r: �gee �^. a n.H.� .s": • `*` � "+f+"� ��` y `3 p '4 �.sp�..: }yam 2 J. b +.4j J SIC QYX VV 61 B6 w! Ci1�I'OF"RAN N0 CUCANONGA - TA DATES r. T0: _chairman an Menders Jof tWe Running'Canmission;j` t9xz FROM: Barrye A. Nant�h,j,5etd'or DWI.l,tigittieer re .. , .tn fr ou ASUBJECT: Condoi c ran rI eq Ang " Vie a �.hder 'oisndfitg aof exlstan, Rrhea yt i. ee� �gng 4Eth ttreet I = or a..proprr red+ convar�t�nceq rsaites` ar•�i aenv� e/.;Anstdr�-fit the � northeast carrier of;, V"irieyav�d Avenue and Ei rEh Street - AFN 2tk1-61 ,=35. 11. eACKCROM" t The protect::, asproved bye the Pian� ;� aiamission on Deck bad 10, :1986, subje to a cAdtiioh to under ground the exlsttng oyu rhead utilitie3 a ng Eighth Stf' a ands to�,pay"an to-lieu fee for one i haif-w' 4�t ""of the futUrc" under Founding, of utslfities,<< lon4 Vir;4rard Ave{�je,.. The Ccnmiss.ion waived the requirement-Pfrr ° ur(dergroi;iadi,6g].or iek pa iApatt for file railroad utilities alo A the proje noria,� Liundary,jusceus.e_lit,was felt that'the 11r63,;4t had excessive utii,V-:-%quireA!As an.the other two frontagQ� On February ,2-5, 1987; the %;Omrlssion granted to the support g P� business on -argil CondiVonal Use Permit allowing the additfon pport cervices. ' The Developer is ry requesting that'=he1Fe relieved of a portion ref the length of uitd4rgrounding required along EighthStrut.°f'°}+is h request etter is attached as Exhibit „ ,p n s II. ANALYSIS: A r The limits of the required undergou"ding area shown oai Exhibit, "Ca_ 'the Deve7oper has stated that kle is willing to pay the Iee for the future undergrounding along Vineyatrd Avenue, and-;Le is willing to underground the.portion 6f utilities along his project's Eighth Street frontage (419 feet)," However, he is requesting t4sa4 he be releived from the requirement "t�-extend the undergroum0ng to , the east side of Cucamonga CrFreh Channel (aft additioct 260 feet). it Is noted that the current policy requires that undergrounding+',be extended acrosat adjacent streets (channels, 41 alleys, etc.) f�.,r corner pi"opertiec. } ITEO.J EFORT �Cp@j N ,� ,+y4 i plt4 S 1 l �� The �QSo *"t 2.��. ae n£SSlen � afit� ti .+s �z s sks t r L c > � velaper s Yltes�. - L i3eveh- ud5 , DGf'rem rCunitdyer.gob" inf rn'f b ts z ut,�n> �ot sk�. foQ s fig,`¢{�{Ci.t.hesr�i i lgF. roFur migor �xfiTCC e � �[ MIMIta-W , ord 'a an ` -per .aVe $tQsh 7et xc o�pp`s,�hry5`1s thVefe .. Pr e ' Cast } Gna�i/Acres act 353P PM , ' , 61 OR PM -3 I M. �pi -via �rD � Based upon the aboie t Can , seed, h�_� ever► i� t �Dve� oOer"""s rcyaquesfi Wore (clpra{}r t ii(s P d ez^Gost w�}4�uIla �the; � it : the,,'] "� r'di Woula,.be, 2.5 timed e ter t ar th sec�on�► high st, ,! The.factor , cq'. bu , cre ,4:ti g La 1. tA��mal i s,3ze Qi✓the �`�Pei•ty �1�O4 acres}t,; 2. it is a corner prcrseit�y, 3.. the.. ,rat+&,' af the d60t )�tQ the 4ront°age �onta('nang util ti•�s is ext e�ieiyr u a��orab e, andi " 4. there is.no. one half rthe cos because t6e:Gpgosii:e side of E 9hth Sts$et i�S'An the City: of Ontario, and the progerty.is already delelbpe it, the Developer's 'request is gr;3nted, the question .arises as to fow will the 2ED feet be, urdergrdunded in the future. II --WQperty to the ease (Papcers 19, Uhi bi t "D") currently be g k tQ the Fload,".0gtro1 District_and:even if `sold is most prcoalxly a dc► car ow to det�ekp; therefore it will most probab Y not under ound -the Lines.` The Commission could designate that ttie Unbs:14 ques�� be undergounded by .Parcel '27 to the sOutheast subject ' of oneh f reimbursement from Parcel 1B YQ the northeasFt'., The cos}t to tParcet 27 including its. total frontage plus' the additio.rai• 2,td 011, yould: be Cost (s) Cosa/Acre k Full Cost.'' 25z.eoo 42,0,00. �. k Minus Reimtwrsemen 126,pO{3 21tt _ .., r y p .,..01. � '�- ,„n .:✓ t�; •� �Y1 �� & �" .- � _fir wy� �� ` � e is 1e4 e a �. xk IV ,tea H'anp.0 Senrior Crv,�iiir no.neer ` x BRH:J'h Attachmentsi Loc-,a So { at e RegBes4t i qui 1 71 t1 x,.. y A ilk 3n,,N h1 Wi1f f�Q ��Fd t`a% t R o} ILI ul r � 9 Far S • �,. e/ r i r } Qk It TTM 7.7 �� t12DA Nr' , jg `3p ENGIMMAM RBy E►�jyEt�g^ �` 4 'f ! t .q r' ` , u ,� ' �\ .Tune 19, �.987 � �( IA L EITY t 10AAMOMA ' Mr. Barr sq Senior 'C`3vilc�sae _ .� City of KA64 s%''Cuparr Onga 9320 Baseline c` ► RanchoC�car�o�r�g �K.9�' 30 Z`° (' Subject: Cond t'ivnal Use Pdrmii No --86 2 4 4 E � 12�000''S.F Conve �3 t, I r^ienee Sail anderrwic6l Cer�ter'Lasated a the ( vorner o�c" ,� Street and tli`naard Aveiein th`eoGertert;:� r3titit ia�llFs�1..,:5ftrved Dist ict �APN,"' Reli o ution No* 86-191 On behalf of the plann.£ng Group, levelop the opo.sedx er far e r ° project, a am submitting `thins' request`for - maditioat� b - Co _ 4 dis ion 3-b condition, Ercirn °the, Engineering y.^ ermt., Diviion setf 'th'A,the apprcved Condition „r , t This r2questel CL'C� -aeaif�ca,tion is- submitted `to thee Planning Commi.=ssion for recorisider&.tion of CG nditian 3=b . which'. provides for undergrounding existing e],ec.tsica� �^ on the 9 I 'and .teleplt�ne Facilities nrpject side of 8th Street. we. are requesting that ;his ` condition; be modified to provide for undergzoundT,g "alo� , ' he project fronta9e only. The project is iocatAa at the ncirtheast corner,of Vi�ieyar`d avenue ' and b;th Street and on the City Limit Line'with: the +-City of 1) Ontario and is bou ided by the AT&SF Railroad^on the north and Cucamonga flood coi�tral •hannei on the east. The sent Wide at idae, `1,04 acres, net, �s 48? feet longand... and narrywing to 79 feet wie at thc�fCucamvnga C tanned end�isue very difficult site to dLvelop because of its; lengt tip depth ratio. Engineering Condi.tton 3-,b provides that the existing Southern California Edison and General Tel4phone facilities,.` joiett use f a common pt7lea, be und:argroVnded to the fi' st pole:'easl: of` t ' " ` 14 of Ak ILT r w 5$yrt` • iS � F ��_ 8,��,¢ i+15T• �^'�T��T}"�-fix:'A Y g a WO J < c andho c„uca�nanga PCucame'ag� wa�+ seats"s�9 Channel a oils�tan'ee of 260 hest east iof the project is ZBr�rfda The undergaundi„ng a ; these, facilities, wSll a'lsa' regui' al dtt rag the u�ciergractnd fscjit�:'es to . tie ';ridge. crd'ssing t �ca�oa �F�s'" I` meats w thin t" * ?�n' er-graund require .� dct �rvn e-cansis�s o 3 utWOV rolP ', feet of'-el ctr3 ,�attd teiphorie facia tie :" r g ndi4f,_� 4-5 Mr. Barmy Modn, SSG and L+3re AZ .Taeoba E s cost .to wrdet;grac nnhe§e facilti at x S i� 20 a esb3matcthe 'for SCE`. f,kL`il iea rind 'T.78:, for GTE f o31' per .00L gentlemen co ri aI t dies. Bat ofhEse t pro ds a detailed lost % Dori ttuallk ' designing_ the, un . , grounding facilities, .:'but �e�t, "t, I,, were reagona�b7 a estimajje, � -� .he total ,,undergroulading Costs attrib�lte3. to this j 5183;�750 or S27f;583 per screw project are , it is our understanding this project has if '�i y 'f, ' the hic��l�.°St: last per acre to underground exi�tting utiLtties id the C$ �- Cost Summary: J In lieu of"fee for fuL�trre S' S,00 fi undergrounding on VJsAi"rard;,.Avenue 4 .- Undergrourid,26g ex( ting 'kephone along project fro tags 0 415 LF \ 31,325 it Urdercrounding existing power, alonl' Project frontage Z15 LF is $17SILF 7- 25 SUBTOkA $11F 350 Undergrounding existing telephone east of •.proiect boundary 260 LF S7S/LF 19,500 Unde-grounding t2xisti11+g power.east of project boundary L60 LF 0,S1'75/LF 45 00 SUBTOTAL- $ 6y-,IbOo TOTAL, 68S per aura: . A �3 'MB+t~ti c C3)�a' .> ,q C31[IC5 {�'�°• ^w.'4 ° '• `r,�,,:' {+'^'S k"^x�, ^ ' "' ," �q w 1 ^t b q W-xgg •'1 The' tide, opparuuee �` c nardoya�c �aa 2 .C@3'ESFASr ek" Cry eYd i �3 ]ti < �p1t1,e $ �IESk } :' k`` r, �horxId '.you tia s q�e ." s �;F7sxiec�, s'dd,b3oa�1Y orsq i��>as 1tc� � ode mot . tardi33y ` : / 24 Vice gllbk cc. The P,Iannitigl`t.r.o%* a; :..'^ ',aR"' 'a "'„74 � .,._1 •` �.e r Res fi0. A RES0 Ur. f�l Ttt� SAw�GHO CtICAMffiGA PZH'40,9 COMML-Sts N APPR49AR h� l 'SIA T fl -'A CORDIUMN. QP ARBR0I��L ? _ �..' % a4, -FQA A 12 �S0. FL CORD IENB SAC% AWi 5'ERVTCE G TER L Fi(3A�fE0- AT THE 4. Ni?T ,, OR$�, O��R S�REET�&,it ARG AVEt�lE IN THE DENiRA1 IN' 51ftURAIL SEW20 DnOm -APR M-013-15 WREAS an the 19th dayof June 19,87 a request fora modificati'Un Of conr,itions was filed"by Mr. 1 ;.gays f'or the`aboveQStat®fl.: ro „act. WHEREAS un tq7 tt.day of joly, 1:987, the hrkeho; Cucamoin�ga,-Planning° Comwftsion held � pbiu j; hearing to consider the 664e-descr1bed condition modification. NOW* THEREFORE, the Rar(dio Cucamonga Planning Commi follows: ssion resolves as ' ECTI4lFt 1: That Condition :.b. wTder Engineering` Division of Resalutiw N0. 86.14- shall be msrdif-ied as follows: The w-ord 'lekv.V, in the fifth Tine sWAI be replaced,,wjtl ,°west",: ( APPROVED AND 46TEO THIS�,g;,DAY Oii ZULY,, 1987. ` PLANNINS COMMISSiG?j' OF THE CITY OF RRNCHo Ctj;AMQjSA BY: Larry T. MCNIe , � `rman - - ATTEST: —Brad Buller,- Deputy enre ary .. I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary,of the Planning Ccmmisst-i of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify.that the foregoiky Resolsrtion was duty and regularly introduced., posed, and adopted by the Planning Commission ;of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Flanning Comrnissidn held on the Bth day of Jury, 1987, by the following vet"e-try-wit: i AYIS: COMMISSIONERS: NOES; C044ISSIONERS; ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: l C is Wiser - a 16 ! � 0.4 17 (714) z: t tcnf$feviEtER$Jpt,�t�jq`��, . in "t .7une 19, 1987 Juti l Filed 932-ocz Mr. 8arry"e R.--Hanson p t% :senior Civil Engineer, City of RAncho Cucammonga 9320 8aselin6. Road Ratnchb Cucamonga, C~- 'I 91730 Subject: Conditional Use Permit Mo. ,�$-2!t for � n"ence Sales and Service Center �,oc�ated at then SP Cbnve-, Corner gf 8th Street and trine Mrrtheast # " Industrial/Rail Server! Y ±d Avenue in tty General ! Resolution two. 85--181 iaist rice APh 2fft--013•-25.,, De&r Barrye:On behalf of the Plannin 9 Craw " project p, developer for ,,the dition 3,b rc : I " su ;ing this "quest for a modif-P"ation ofpCon-t C6641t:ion from the as sct forth Engineering Ritrision} ' - in the ap.provear, onditional.Usat Permit. II This requested CUP modificatiaj i Commission for reconsideratiotx Of 3 onditiont 3-b to the Planning for undergcounding existing etl:cttricatl and telephone On on the project sid;aG of ath Stro*t We art requesting that this condition be modified to prnv#de -for indergrounding along the project frontage-only, The projecAS�2 at ghat northeast corner of Vineyard and .$th Stllt� City Limit Lin+ withtte Avenue .Cnta#io an City .of by the AT a SP Railroad on i»he north and Cucamonga can channel on the east. 'the site, 1.b� acre ,. net, long and 92 feet wide at vi.Ieya;rd Avenue and t wide at the Cudamonga Channel, and is very difficult s7ite to develop because of its length to depth ratio Engineering Condition 3-b..praviatt that the existing Southern# California Edison and General Telepft;�ne facilitlea, joint use ra ' common poles, be undergrz;jnded to, th'0, first: pole .;ast of the y L3 a June 9, 19S7 � City , f Ranch&Cucamo " 1 , �Y Page uG Cucamonga Chenxrt a �iotalnce of 260 feet east of th p j,'•c' " easterly bou ro ndary i'die un-40'r '�Iunding of these faci!.ities rill r also require .attaching, tag underground facilities, .to trhe; 'ridge gassing the Cucamonga Ch nel the underg.,ronad re ufre ments with th* .p o� ct frori44q* ;consists of undaerground ny- `- feet of ele >trica.l and telphorre f<ac3li ti� ^s.. 4 . • Nor. Earney Moen, SCE, and Mr.YAl Jacobs, QTE., have estimated the cost to undergrou,ndc ttres{e fncilitiet 'at S150-t200 forp+kr kinear loot gentlemen SCE facilities and $75+ fQr t;2E; facilities. Ecth gentles�en could not provid: s 4*1ta,J1*4 cost.Without x:c�tually , designing the undergrounding ,fa- lities, but felt them` were reasonable estimates. The total undergrounding costs attributed to, this pro4e t are $183,750 or per per acre. I is our understanding, this �s -� project na3 if' not they higb.,V t cost;. per arse to underground existing utilities in the City. _ Cost Summary: V $ 35,cao In lieu of fee for future `,} undergrounding on YineyM}rd Avenue Underprounding`�xist3ng telephone l a lon j•,pro j act frsntage 41;j LF ir5laarry LF -31 125 Undergrounding exil.ting power 7, aton4 pro gt fr t #r 415 LF '� Sc1 LF " �:72,625` SUBTOTAL S11t? 750 Underg,Qunding a sting telephone � undsry 26f1''Li°' a S75/LF 19,500 Unoergrounding existing poWei• cast � of project boundary 260 LF J� S175/LF r -, SUBTOTAL. 3' 65 000 - TOTAL 7 S183,750 � 0r S176;f83 peg' acre �. 4041 i=" 1 AYn '4�I�1�?.��li/�II�,�Mwrw.� �^?i-.. `1�.. - •`-�M Zz The pruj+�C ..is ;'. y cie d rr#th ari g a1x t the 8 t Sree u �a. tf batta� . 1 "prori+�xty ;an1ri apt side of, e*h Stree€ is' t"m tta r. + �► afr ;a a,�d there is ncn op,porrt�xity s € , cfa,Lit .e raspec u�2y "+ i,. . cSar�► ,ie n. c� ,� ma tee\` as, it is of vpmeast i �t. �t se`dr 4iajo isnt u r s doe, )Should u tev+s " is r eeit3 or n*ad addtitional:. i I ntormat4on, 1 please iet me �-Aaw,. Cnrdisi Iy, ` +D. 17. MAYS, 9,.�„ 'Vice pre5id4�'t R � cc: The PIsneing Group` , Ott on r Q z w. • lax's �� ► �� fig,, '� t 40 49 < 4 L Al 114 ae _ F • r�? AV l t w r �( � � '� � 3 ► y�,11�t � �. ear e � vsr.1 � Y �•:3 JSsfA, iyr.c MX AfFA ll _ r nA � ZS2.ACU21 *IS �� :, �^a�r ��•� n_. I oaas.nc afe ac.ea 4 k.a �V►ae ern �• '' TO -' MS S • �• •iran.a» fws 400 ow may. Cffy OF - a C4N UTION sN RANCHO CUC ONGA ENGMMMMG DnWON p b~ � r"1 *, CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA c so ST"F REPORT w a _I DATE: July 5, 1987° 1977 TO: Chairman and Members ot'the`Planning Commission x. FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer .., ✓✓' BY: Barbara KraTT, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSI --tiT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 10771 - THE DELR GR'_tKCOMPANY - A SUDdIVISIeft o ,acres o an into,_ parce s i in t e qw 2-4 du/ac) Residential District located between Wilson Avenue snd Ban,Van�`""Street, west of Deer-'Creek Channel (APRA, 201-191- 1�) 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Re guested.- Approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map as shown� on EXhib t "B- B. Parcel Size: I Parcel 1 - 50.50 acres Parcel 2 - 19.65 acres - Total 7T5 C. Existing Zoning: Low Residential Development District D. Surrounding Land Use: North - Single Family Residential South - Vacant East - Deer Creek Channel, Floou`Control West - Chaffey College E. Surro2 ding General Plan and Development Bode Designations: North - Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 du/ c. South - Low-Medium Density Residential (4-8 du/ac) East - Flood Control West - Chaffey College F. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant and slopes approxtmateiy 0% in a southeasterly direction. �r ITEM.K PLANNING CU'0 v., 6pQR# s PM 1077 PAGE 2 OLY 8, 1987 lJ r� IT. ANALYSIS:. The develOw d� tentative approval liar this parcel raap'r r " psc . . uq create 2` _ rciing Purposes in connection�wii ba apprdyb o Tentative Tract 1ty�c{ t approved by the. P`Tanni�ng Gotntis�ap_at .r-; March 2 , 1'98T fates theme de4elropment of 2P& custom; sfng�le famny la, ;E Ee attached Exhibit ", ,• 5 The conditions or Tern ir.e Trac L3642 shall apply tj7 this pam;l nap. iTT. ENVIR MENTAL B YMMV^' 'Ihe .artp�Ncant cam�sfet�d .Part I of the St can Iic ed.a d 1 n�ry s;Ci 9ati on arid' compl eted Pant II of the TnitiaT Study, tlii adveres impacts upon the enWiror aept are anticipated as resent of this', ra •ect. Therefore, fssuince of Negwt ire Declaration it appropriate° . ' IV. CORRESPONDENCE: lfucibes of Public Fearing have been scent to surrounding proper owners a5 placed in the SAily.Report N a er. Postin at the site has also beer, completed. p p f i V. RECOMMENDATIORs It i8 rpeommended that the Planrt erg Commission consider a inputan elemenntt of the Tentative ParcL- +ion. If after such l consideration r�.t�ie C*00ssion can rec'moend appr 1, then the adoption ; of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Neq ive Declarationwould be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, O: I Barrye Hanson Senior Civil Engineer BRH:Bk:dlw a Attachments, Vicinity Map tExhibit "A"} Tentative Map (Eil bit -a-)>-` Tentative Tract 13542 (Exhibit "C") t Resoluti3n and Recommended Conditions ofApproval µ. r S 1 r NILL7 :Le-o %oV A�Ft4 Lri e �GOLS�Ecb s�t�.�SsosG,l� g}J CITY T I OF RANCHO CL?r'AMoNGA Trma� ENGD EEM(j*t,DIM ON' , TOTAL OWN AM-MbACS. T E N T A T d V E at=I w I DID." PARCEL "OAP NO , ,10771 ^I iN 1?IF CITY OF RANCHO C110A1'0.1',A. WNW OF SAN BERNARDINO.5 ATE OF CALIFORNIA. ^ C; aEIW A 61YIOItN lAr a rMT10N Tli A'DRUIEAV MM."�4 OF T80=10"E9.TOMMI!I HMTN. - A E 7 YG9i.aM atylnAAotw aAt AID tERIOJAN.ACCC1Mt�W TO TILE OFFICIAL►AT TWREEOF. I.H. HAOOLE. R.C.E. 14114 MAY. I?l HADOLE t ASSOCIATES. INC. NOTEs,. I �.sA1atr7 171INa P.C.41•611 KAMO C"AltT. x.tuo ufrr Tir du. is nii°a i iiw.�i." .Aient. �F e.f l .eaeralw,_a.r.v xN ceotmrae f.CWTCINa rsa ATRIAL MfM nJM IN IN$. TRACT EE,�4582-Z 'acwa. �-- CANISTEL.PHENUE ��{ mow„#,,�.1#• a- �r.s.". +-" — `.Y' ^�uref�,• v�R ` �:r+.a•_'mot/�'.�'_,t 1 a ZIA i i!!� +.�' Ia..y�T.' � C_'�.�.I rPh[•a•-•'.r lC 1 I - \ mil•"r�+" is/•» UTILITY COwmIE3.r .f♦ ��IIM�P 1'v��,•\T`� s,.'-'�..w`^% I.YaiE)1/CEfRN >• ,1 IT•^^C t� �,+�` ✓�'.ti�(+-..A ! ` grgr�l�iANa lUAA R W. IW./ ./��tiA�.�ll` \\ 3g��P/ti•-,�.i.' llt/ ��. MpCU..3LYA�'iAil �_. _ L r �-++"ram ('1�T,r ,.f/�v��• a c.o°amfm cxlromm z � ,�u,d�ln 1�� _�.J j✓1.7� �' 7 Iau��N�u�ll�i. 'Vrr �r ...��..r'-vr..�M y.....�l�i\\� -�.S r..� i•SIC CKIrON1A t01N1 r4 1�'__�"'...__• (.•.�....,...� � ,s -� r� ( 1]al e.rr.rele rra[cT to t � '---(• Hold 1r1A•Nr•aT4a M if 1bw.. M f ' .f`) TiU.1IT70 Sri'—"�1, ...r�,„-i'.'��Z /~ a, .�L/��~ '• �Af fir•ul• • f of C._'..'•`•� �` r�. u1i�w°rnriiT c�awr�a I w. .A^'1� j/ %r/r�"�'�'� r�r /u 'd•... iu+rol AxNUF uo r/cra Avp4+C. '��. ��•Ip`R�G•iFL�ti=2A..alar/ / �v I, GY M .. �.^•IA•�✓r�'1� , 'n CArr �`..� ,e- �r+I'+�•a R- BA!lYAN —a.:s' .•STREET•'! ,� v•cw+T ,� ..I�.I.rrx OWER!s=IYIm. EMINO:RI wrlac Dru aatz<eawANl nroaA.a aafeeurce.lae. alto YiIU AYFN.0 /atD C•IfiN ataur � CCCNCACA.G./17]0. 411TA AWs G,ftF01 rlae vlo a+rsw r+ac vin fxs.mu i cwnaT aaa.�w.s W Ns rs..ww. r.v .r.ra�rm �.ew w.aw: rrw .ww•ITK rr•r r•- .u.s m.n �e.a � rA.Yi sr.•.rr.•a 77.y k- r � ' Y , w! �, M �+ s / j x IPA- RANCHO cucAidoNGA, Tom. DON • { _ RESOLUTION NO. 4, A RESOLUTION OF THE KANN ING COMISS10N OF THE CITY OF ��. RANCt'* CU.CA"GA CAlt& OPNIA, COD TENTATIVE APPROVING,TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N ER 1077,1 - WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map N.unber 10771, submitted by Deer Creek ° Company, applicant, for the purpose of s.pbdivi ding, into 2 parcels, the real property situated in the C`* of Rancho Cucamohga,� County of San ardino, State of California, identified as, APN(s)° 2,01-191-17, located between Wilson Avenue and Banyan Street, west of Deer Lreek Channel; and WHEREAS, on July 8, 1987, the Planning" Commission held a duly • ' 4dvertised public hearing for the above-described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS ` FOLLOWS. SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: y 1. That the map: is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the *provemfnt of the proposed subdivision is }' consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site ;is physics?,ly suitable for the proposed developeerit, 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will. not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 10771 is hereby approved subject to t e attached Standard Conditions anal the following Special Conditions: Special Conditions 1. Development of the individual parcels shall be subject to the conditions of approval for Tentative Tract No. 13542 per Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-37. 2. An offer of dedication, for street purposes (40 foot minimum width) over Parcel 1 extending {:om Wilson Avenue to Parcel 2 conforming to the approved street alignment for Tentative Tract No. 13542 shall be provided. 3. An offer of dedication for storm drain purposes over Parcel 2 in favor of Parcel 1 shall be provided, 91 r t. 77,17,17777 , I?li(1yE� 'iN A l T&D G Is aTti LAY oP ZLYI 19,87. ' PlA.NNING COMMIS51%`AF I CITY OF BANCt,p CU.CkMQtd1G4 Larry MtNie , Rr AT:PaT• Brad e!^, ' y= eCfptaiy 1, Brad Buller, Deputy_ Secretary of the Planning Commission=of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do-ifiefeby oertify that the foregoing Resolution was dUV and regularly introduced, passti, arA adopti'd by thg PZ�arrning Gcsmmission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the 'Pi-annin�g. Commission.held ' an V , Sth day of July, I96x,. by the fallowing Vote-to-Mlitt, � .iy.VES: CONMISS-IONERSi NOES; COMPlISSICKER,S. � ABSENT. COMMISSIONERS: , KIM $ nr 'fir "E.d. �_�•��`,.�" a9'ts o� r 4Yo"��' 3 5e It � L � S �Ya2 4��' '►�, a"�` �ago,� �$ '�:° ' M i 7. S„ g • 1 � �W ii sill vng sib61 Sj s iy a.'. iw fin M j r y ` Q ' t y Vp i r3 ' NYS .r*i pi i IT3C +�; � •ti m � O�M I I.t Y1 �M K�TL� 4`�L WIi Y�4 dC�N V Y W I A J k- f y1� i yy 6ayi p�[x cc kl_ 4 V� FQ` GO� yY sg 9 Y ISO 2.2 off L; P ♦ ®` ` -Y: r� Syr O �. i �� s jaai Pm •�„+ �p y.t �t tir.�Q �i� � � ,$E � yy • i 4Y �.�. a $ •,� � �e �. e� ♦ as -4 4 4 LY O m Oqy pp Oey•. m -ip.� q1V V MC N A P. I 11 1' q i V 7777 RESOLUTXN No. 87-37 RESOt UTIOiI A F#E, A7.AN Nlf GOMMISSJ,0N Dif THE (R7Y OF •.#f RANCHO COCAMM, `, tFORNIA, COMiTIANA6.LY APPRUING TENrATI�JE TR'lf l'`AP ho. Inv- WHEREAS, Tentative l`r act Map (to, 135424 haref a+fter "Map" submitted bx, the Aeer Creek Company, a►glicant, for the purpose of subdividing, the rear propart ,.situated in the Ci Of Rancho C;optmorigA Coyntlr of San Re~rnardina State A�'Cal if�rni a, dbscrlbei# as a, rest ti ail sp id risiem of 05.66 acres of land into Z06 single f'a mi ty lots located each of Chaffer r CaTlege between Idilson Avenue and, s,*nyan Street {AP#t 2.t1-191-!T and a parti�on of 201-1w91 1I j reguUrly'r;�ae before- the ft1 pni�ng, C4 fission^foe-apublic hearing: and action on March; 25, 1587:�, and WHEREAS., the City Planner has recommended approval of the 'Map subject to all conditions set:,,,forth in the Engineering and reports; and Planning Division's WHEREAS," the RIPOninq Commission has read and c !'�onsidered the Engineering and Planning D`hision's reports and h(''x considered other evidence presented at the public nearing. NOW, THERSFORE,. the Planning Comission, of the City ;n€ Rancho ' Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION! is The Planning Commission makes t)re' following findings in regard to entat ve Tvact No. 13542 and the Map thereof.- (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plan6; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code., and specific plans; (c) T)' ;,--5ite is physically suitable for the type of + 4,Ilelopmont proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial envirorntal damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict ! with any easement acquired by the public at large, 1 now of record,- for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. �� i P NG i�11,t SOLUTION NO. Ar1c}Itl ylf T t3Ei - DEER CREEK MOML ; � {gage 2 ks (g� TtA Oft project will not create adverse impacts on the env1ronme0-\aY1d a Necdativo Declaration rsis issued. Sfxti.1 Z-4 Tentative Trod Map No. 13542 a cony of which is attached erg� hereby approved`subject to all nl t;e follAiwing conditions and the attached Standard Conditions; Planning Division ' 1.. Approval of "Ontative Tract Map No. 13 54�� shall be contingent upon'"approval of General Phn Mendeent 87-02 , Genarat Plan Amendment 86-1)S,, and €.. Development District Aftodment 86-06. , 2. 11* side-4nti cul-de-sacs shall be l ands taped and irrigated to provide a consistent thewa along the circu!at^lon spine Oanistel Avenue). Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the city Plattner prior to the issuance of building permits. Cerner side yard fencing (decorative masonry b4ock) ' shall be required. The location and type of materials for the wall shall be shower on the landscape plan which shall be reviewed and appr'ved by the City Planner prior to the .issuance of bui l di ng k�rmits. 4. A dvcorati.ve masonry block wall shall be required aroundr1he entire tract perimeter. The location and type of materials shall be shown on th* landscape plan which shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior- to the issuance of betildiing peraits.. S. landscaping shall be provided to buffer the residences along the west property tine from Chaffey College. The plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Cfty Planner prior to issuance of building permits. 6. landscaping along Wilson Avenue shall be -installed to provide a swooth transition between the proposed dtvelopm*nt and the existing Dew Greek Comeau-ni'ty to the north. 7. If substantial changes �re tiequired to the grading plan, as determined bvi the City Planner, City Engineer, or Building Official, the plan° shall be reviewed and approved by the Grading Coop M.4t prior, to the issuance of any permits. _ a"t ht n , TENTATtYE T&7t PEER CREEK M 4rch 25s 1987 Engineerin_ Division 3. 340yan Avenue; A. The portion 410119 the project frontoP,,e sha, l 6e dedicated and constructed as a standard half width Street ►it;h'full Tmprovemfents oft the north side, and 2C feet: of pavement within a 40 foot dedication. ib, The portion from the wept tract boundary to met the existing, portion to the west shall contain a 26 foot wide pavement centered within "the ultimate M gh"f.waiy;, h er a 401 minimum width right-if-way shall provided initially. A permit and taseeents shall be obtained from the Metropolitan Water, District for the portion within its right-of-way. A . The portions described in $ and b shall be TM constructed with Phase III as shown on the plans. F 2. Secondary access shall be provided for #III phases as i approved by the Foothill fire Ofstriat. 4 3. The portion of Nasser plan Storm Drain line $2. 3-K shall be constructed from Deer Creek Channel to the west tract boundary. A debris "basin Shall be provided, at the -wasterly inlet or as otherwise approved by the Cii� Engineer. The davaloper shall eligibly for reiRburs"Int Of. t* cost of construction 'in accordance with City Ordinance Pao. 75. 4. Intarnatl sUrn drain facilities shall be provided as necessary based upon a final drainage study approved by the City Engineer. in particulars the need for flow fnUfception at the intersection of Canistel with D Street shall be addressed. Also protection from drei naige to the north of the site shall be a►idrassed. S. All storm drain-4onbections to fleet- Crack Channel shall ram subject to the approval of •the Flood Control District. Arty redesign of the proposed storm strain system Opt to district requirmsnts- shall (M subject to t?de approval of the City Engineer. 6. Right-of-gay Shall be provided for acCesS ramps to Dear Creek,Chaonei at DaNyaw and Wilson Avenues as recomobded by the Flood Control District and approved by the City Engineer. �t PLANNINfr.'C01 0 'OLiITIO:H N4 , TElii°AfT Ti '1 .�tip* DEER.CREEK.� Page fth)95,L r T the deeelo beam i�Cx costs incurred (iuscl'uding co, atrGn proceedings} in the ac'iUAiit`tvn of tA off-site right-of-way required ;I for storov d Aim' ands street construction if it is nmt acgO.rL*&by some, others means prior t recordat i,on of they Pi mat: Map,.. An it, to thins effect between the' Dj Moor artd the'��ty sitall be, executed to. recar`dd ,'of t� E'ina Hip., Pri�oz! Appro.vaT of thi tentative tract, map- is conti�r�gent upon the City Council approval royal o►` General Flan Amet*daerrts 86_03D and -02A and Development O istri`ct. Astern -; 6-D5. E Building Division . I. All drafnage across lots shad;, be conveyed '' in by,theeasemenBuilding Offts, and icialevises reW:( ie�o and apex°"Yed �M1 APPROVED- THIS 25TH DAY ` MARCH, 1997. t PLP.NN S THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANGNGA By-, Plod i ATTEST: r u ler. e eretary i, grad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Comm,,ssion'of the,City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby ceaYtify that the foregoing Revilutiot; was a;t,K and regularly introduced, Passed, and adopted by thf Plan r rxo CammUsi.on of'the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planr%fng Commission ield on the 25th day Of March, 1987, by the following vote-to',wit AYES: COMISSIONERS: MCNIEL. CHITItA, BARKER, EmerTCK, TOL,STOY NOES: COMMISSIOKERS: MORE ABSENT:, COMMISS-TONERS: ,NONE R .W Sal _ ,eq i �� c s� �37 'n fit` Sr �iS Vim" j,. h IL 1. r 4 • M. � ?� ., ;— ,� ;lax : '1ec�a 4w� a Me Jul Al S' toiMw#fie yr�q N g Y Z e v a IL - o1 yy 1a�.y y� �Y``S.4 d• �a Yd4� �� I 9 {, �:. ES$ a_ 'LLay..E� ase»� �, ate. r.rga{�r y•."•u $2.0 oY {o nz ' Epp p� s Q y•3 V i O i 1 M V O somas, •'�;- ax +�' a. o� mr µf`�[ �`�" z _ IL ivNo ` ..moo +'r�1' a:Vr.. « i� .•. .Z. �a..�uL.ti a`.ya«. t'*- n' 4YM�.�> flyy,{�}c*. iF3y,�S� ly Ny�t�l�Yl zk2 2; Y ya� i �E tl Ni .N �Y K'i 0•.a11� +•J >' "Xvtl �..,�qY s"b ��`a.� v'�;Y ul tiees. �_ _� : VA .1 + as'ly� hh ys AML 4: M i t 1 « is i 3 $� $b„"'B y• v i C f a. Al I Z Z" -grz � "L c�S� e.r+g �4R f1'�t' `Pi P Ma. aY.j� #�rWp� "a AtH TICS otNy «j Ys� « � W 'YyL a. ■ {(�,.b, 0.0.Y9«.iF � _�p VYm Y • C�� .AO.. 4 4N�6j>�r� mow."g$ e�4 Xt w 1tL44¢-e Y K+1i6 +at Y�M� Qa a• pp � wl d•I!21 X7 li•jig —o"1 L4 iA. '�f (� T Wr fig'; i • M i i N I- � g iz` jsN3X= bird - $N -- e� _ epe` -■■ L■ OO11yy__��` 3 . ,ry fe .2 5w 9y 4 b yL.� $i �ou ISE zia"� L iht to 3,a C ag$ tea v...N.'l:. K4•^ tic 3:;v rwI :FwS�e� .sw1 $s .e Q� y _ oy"O� .� i 41 Liao ppv a .+i ��•n$ J 4A •� all It jig gpi :'� ..� �� = =�9 � •-a. � �r yea �_ �� s a � CH J.: L we jp =fl �1.pV {� VV� pit -w V}c"}B `.S cN�elY 'E gi1•yy.+sa� W C� yw.-y� {i i 4 F. NO` ji `Z Si S�i �N i''�a. ., .._ is —__�<..a.� <seY3 a gE e••a KOM h6{.M Ks, 6+LQ rOa1—s.4 M[O Kp Wit~.G�V/a�ib W ♦� JJ.. A ui Y4 i ce_g .� •• IP _iol bxu ee Q. r V$ � rrrsV. A i~G w;g me �j {•1 YNY� 4Y ¢r s 00 YpAK Gr.q.ilw y.@ria � tl��a `=ygqyyM,.,yy ysP�'^•.�V � sq ' •aN It 'o ,r YY 9 HIS 'BY. . I %=-! F W Y NSA- IN Y r w .= !tl1 U Y 4 gail.t _ x�•_r �sgi 2 ��a � '"rr y ��d ._ $ih�r $`��A „`P,,� Lt qy _t uca M,' y 5iF $, •�Y � v is - i rY "s 21 i g �93 a s 91 ^_s sitIf z e _ V . j 21 9 r g 0 V IX: x Y Yg L Y•�i �.� �P if w w V'i. 4 MM 49Y y ! ` $ � a' yr aw Y M_G Y9�pNq y>r L_w L ��r = b s&4• �ty+ YO it= }xj O �'•jjY, �i1 _ 1 i_ Lpq+� Np a•Ur M r _ � � .6r �'KW Ot/f.'v U. WLge W. Y 4i�t �r left Ita 2 -oil cj CIS Vz S"y��• �.j..��5^. i ; i$ � �_ a a s s � � �� r�'�St� b� all— As a `te ■ �¢i abt y. f �R Cal �e �j TIE w EIV Nl�A - YI-a 4 � � $_ y� L 12 IL ZZ 52 Van r, } i b a�C OR �i 1 12c r v i Ol Vibi r t y _K a �' bm,w�� C �p G ¢S Vr�! Y ��YIti K , rr`�.Y wY giwa. wA K tl l ww am' CV- tao $ r 15 =$- s k »gN$v.12 + 4 psi yS ' Y, i= to -m- $ ` � 4 a ; � = �- is �E >Z .r A. �v .,a ]EIS Is Val Sr Ya s H Ii ill a la a�� f ait aaj € g'1 5^y' q�. Njaa. � j 1t �.yg lc � '�•• �a a.a X�:.: 8 -. 'Ii R V j ,S Y �` w SY eY.� +' += e• riYtlA. YIV \Mr� .[A1 I� �; ��Ill bYW RAM j� E s _ a�' Y AIL Y! •• _�� Q� Nr C� ♦�. a V Y A WMal sj �ae �s Af sag s mb a a I R s its $ : 1U Z Kea a v . -1 w Ili tl x 2 sa ` � :Ali` US 4]i q • g ,fir '33 Zr! .. w c ►l l _,��I i Q a 0 s a • III i I y��. A C= .i = �• Y �. �� i._L i. G't. HE JER —C�� 4Y �ag� • NBA CM�A .a y♦.M 6M QB=—� — = Y4• VVV QQ�+L Yam— -- yee>M. wD— f•.L�{i— <9 lMr.Ni- <ia. VJa i4Y.. w� Sig "q�+Tna.q T CITY OF F...4.NC11O CVCAMONGA c�M STAFF REPORT ce r O Q DATE: July 8, 1987 1977 T0: Chairman and Members bf the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City P1anier BY Chris llestun, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: VARIANCE 87-05 SWISSIAN - A request to reduce the f par ng an average an scaping Se0&ick requirnt ed along neighborhoodCommercial center in d41el General Cogwrtial new Arrow Route for a Disrict located at the au corner of Arrow A,oute and Ptal ven Avenue - APR 209-04I--4/, 50„ RELATED FILE: COMDITIONAL USE p" IT 617-07 u I. BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting the variances in parking ancT 'average landscaping setback In order to accommodate 0`,a commercial center. II• ANALYSIS: The applicant is requesting a reduction in the required parr ng and average landscaping setback along Arrow Route which is � a Special Boulevard. A. Parking. Table 17.10.040-8 of the Development Code requires �,0 ee or a street yard setback measured from ultimate face of curb. The applicant has proposed a setback of 20 feet, 6 inches. B. Landscaping. Table 17.10.040-8 requires a 45 foot average fare; an scap ng with a minimum not less than 30 feet, as measured from ultimate face of curb. The applicant has proposed aw average landscaped area of approximately 29 .'cet, with al'; minimum of 20 feet. III. FACTORS FOR CONSIDERATION: The purpose and intent of a Variance isl' o provide ex y rom the strict application of development{; standards when special circumstances pertaining to the property such as size, shape, topography or location deprive such property) of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and in the same district inconsistent with the objectives of the Development rode. In reviewing individual cases for Variance, the following criteria must be considered:: ITEM L t PLANNING COPitiISSION STAFF RE:.PDRT v nriance F,..7-05 July S. 1997 _ Page 2 A. Special Circumstances: 1. I;-, the property unique with respe:t to size, shape, topography or location? 2. Are there exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property or<proposed use that do not apply rally to other properties in the same zone? S. preservation of Pro\,. Rfghtj ardshfp): 1. Can reasonable be made of the property without .� this variances ; 2. Without Xhis 4;arF�aoce is the applicant denied privileges enjo it by„owners of other. .propertios in F` the same ,zone? �h1�� 3. is the hardship !elf imposed br created by the � physical constraints of the site? C. Damage to Others: 1. Will the Variance be detrimental tn, the public health, safety or welfare? 2. Will the grant;ng of this Variance be a special privilege inconsistent with liaa,tatlons ors= other properties in the saw zone. IV. SPAFF REPONSE• A. The project site is a vacant infili lot. It is rectangular and exceeds the minlwm lot width and depth requirements. The property is essentially fiat �dthout any significant vegetation. therefore, the proms,-could not be considered to be unirte with regards to size, shape, or topography. However, because of the infill nature of the site, exceptional or extraordinary circuestarces could be determined due to the existing setbacks located on the west and the east sides of the project stte. Jack in the Box provides a 24 foot parking and approxfmately 26 foot average landscaping setback and the Neighborhood Center has approximately 24 foot parking and 27 foot landscaping setbacks. AOL q - � PLANNING,COi1MISS10k,STAFF REPORT Variance 87-06, ` July 8, 1987' Palo 3 B. The Variance request is the result of a. Combination of factors. buillding size and. location, parcel size, and surrounding zoning and land use. The location of the building is dictated by the shape of the parcel and the surrounding land c uses. The surrounding projects are single-story and would suggest a low profile building,. The orientation of the buildings should be towards A�,rdw Route, which is a Special Boulevard. The rectangular sF,1`1 of the parcel, in combination',,,,, with these other factors, would%ctate a linear building." If the Brain building were reduced a depth of 37 feet ver � IJ the 50 iC?et proposed., it cou?,d be leasib'le to provide adecp e parking and also provide the 45 foot average landscaping setback. However, based o a study of other commercial centers. approved within the City, V)e average building depth is 64 feet . ha Min1mum at about 50 feet. Another alternative is that the site could acaramaodate a 5,800t square foot restaurant or the site plan could be modified to elisUate the cc ner restaurant building which would reduce the amount of parking required" by x5 spaces 'This would allow a redesign of the parking area to comply witW Code-equirements. C. The granting of a Variance would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare.. The potential lozis of extensive landscaping could be considered detrimental to the aesthetics of the overall area. V. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Before granting a Variance, the Planning omen sslon must make all of the following required Findings: A. That str1et--=)r literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified- regulation would result in practical difficulty ,L^__unnecessary physical, hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this Code. B. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that. do not apply generally to other properties in the save zone. C. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of the privileges enjoyed by, the owners of other properties in the same zone, D. That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation on other otther properties classified in the same zone, el E. INat the gi#otIng of the yvfAnce *ill not be detx wtlall to the Public tie-lth sarety Pr welfare, or' pally injurioa► to, apeie5. or, ive+ er�t ttit very. . YL. CORRESPQi1DE._ itew has been adi!e�seduas a .Tlblic iiearing. a e .a spapex ra ii>�pp party own6, r- thin ZM fee o �'We ave �► notifiF_ n�-edot1tc" ,public'' hearing not +ces have Abeem posted on the sub <p'as�tay; YII. RECQNIElIDAt}ti, in ings atta pret` a oen8�g� i Ain 1"ke gh the ti `0 attached Resolution of va'l.'wii'th Pieldi;�%g5.. pe subw d., �rad l er e'. City annex " Attachments. Letter of Justification ' Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "S" w Site Plan Resolution of Approval with Conditions LA Aim, _ Proposed ARROW PLAZA- SHOPPI N% CENTER South-West corner of Arrow Route and Naiven Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca, Request is being made for a variance from parking setback required per Development Code, Table, i7.IQ.04O-R. Required lurking setback From Arrow Route south curb is 30 ft. Requested setback is 20.5 ft. d#Astification., Parking is propos+d to be setback same: distance as that of the westerly contiguous development; which is 20.5 ft.from the southerly curb of Arrow Rdute.Thus, the landscaping strip will be in line with that of the already deveioped property to the Latest. The property east of Malven Ave has t parking setback less than code requirement. The imposition of the 30 ft. parking setback will er�rtr cause to eliatinate one row of parking in the middle of the parking area(Ilcars) and thus create a financial hardship for the developer for not being able to adequately utilize the site, or cause to f0tmtnate the 'nedian landscape island parallel to Arrow Route, .,�nd thereby cause . the parktrq 'andscaping to be less than required, where it ►`s'needed most. The proposed development and parking is compatible with the surrounding area in proposing same parking setbacks from Arrpw Route, as its neighbors on either side. it also proposes ntt`active and ryarmonious landscaping in parking areas, as well as to all setback areas and plaza paved areas.. i 1 a � tuNti+YiNc wMtMW r � • VrM � �\;_ un i i AOL NOW � � Y NORTH CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA t • r� - _ .rr. elan curwamw9, ,. �+ . 40 IV . _ 1 = � �.>. � ,•.off At Vi 1 NVOO VIEW OW 1p"amn"WAU, as a.r♦Rirwas�e erswwrrcr.. CITY CF _ L+ l �.!rnu. It ,7� '-.-.®. 'tub, � , n ' RESOLUTION NO, A RESOLUTION OFTHE RANCHO CUCAMONGRiPLANNING COM,,ISSION r APPROVING YARIAOCE NO, 03-05 TC ALLOW A PEDUCTION IN THE ' REQUI ED PARKING AD AVERAGE LANDSCAPING SETBACKS LOCATED AT SVE SOlC EST CORNER, OF MAL-..YEN AVENUE AND AR40W ROUTE IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL Dl,STRICT —APN 205-04I-49, 50, A. Recitals (i} On the 13th day of March,, 1987, an application was filed and acreFted on'the above-described projr7t; and (ii) on the 8th day of July, 1987, ae Planning Com9nission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to fMction 65854 of the California Government Code; and �i (iii) On the 7th day of December. 1983, the City Council acdopted Ordinance 211, Development Co.d' -o -which established parking and average landscaping setbacks for the GiOeml Ctxmercial Qistriet, and (iv). All legal,_ prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution f_ have: occurrecf. B. Resolution c c r NOW, THEREFORE, It is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucam;�nga as follows: . This Commission hereby specificnlxyjinds that all of the i facts set forth in the RW tals, Part A, of this ` Resolution are true and correc, 2. Based upon' substantial evidence, including public _ tesVemony, and a staff report with attachments, the Commission specifically finds: a. That the variance request is for (1) a 10 foot reduction in the, parking setback along the tortherly property line, and (2) a 16 foot reduction in the average landscaping setback or Arrow Route; b. The application applies to vacant property, located on the southwest corner of Arrow--Route and Maiven Avenue with stre.-�t frontages or,,2581 and 21.4` respectively; 5, Reso1utfda No. tfc':'i ttGe 87="65 - 54rk-fssvi:an. � Ju?v $, 19d-7 Page Z 1 c. , The property to the north is devel'oped with )r� single family dwellings, the property to the;.. �. east is the City of Raftholl Cucamonga Mei�hlrtto64 Center, the -property, to the: south is a Chino Basin municipal Water District 1 facility, and to the nest is a Jack-in-the-Om restaurint9 f d. The application is in con3.unction with Conditional Use Permit 87-6i r6west for the development of a 14,000 square -foot ne; borhood center`, J, e. The proposed 20 foot parking rr/ ,ck and 29 foot average landscaping setbat-, -;Orov Rockte are consistent with the setbacks on the. adjacent properties to-the west and,,east f. The intent of the special setbacks is to create consistency.along the streetscape.'. 3. Based upon suk.�S`tantial evidence presented to this camission duriii4"',the above-referdnced, July 8, 19$7 hearing and upon,specific findings of facts set forth is paragraphs i:and 9 above; this Ccaission hereby finds and co,"Oudes'as follogss a, lfrat strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the spbcified regulatiqp, would deprive the applicant of privileges en„ .yed by the owners of other properties ir; lire same district. b, That the gr=anti-,g of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other prof rties classified :'n the same district. c. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstrnces or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district d. That strict ;, 'Tteral interpretation and enforcement of=`"tfii-specified regulation would result in practical:, difficulty or unnecersary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the DevoloWnt Code. a July 8i 140 Page 3 a �e e. That grafnting of the Varfarce wii't nit-b detrit n� t the Publiv,t e4l th; safe"' or weT� k o h►ateriarly In��iaiaus to properties or i rerr tits iW the vict t�, �� 4, tod upon the ffadgogs ano d`oncq�utions set north in Paragnajjs. f,6 AS .•grad 3 abov.a, this Co.wtstion hereby aPprq yes ttie<requesi for Variance Na. 8:7-05ti APPROVED AND ADOPTED, MS.8TH f)AY, '�p jUa, , 1981', PLANNING COMMISSIOR OF THE'QJTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA % BY: p i arry TN: d, rnsan .. ATTEST: ra Sull6r, ePR ' cre ary I, Brad Wllec i 8epnty Secretary of th'e Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the Foregoing Resolution was doy and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucaw' Aga, at a regular mating of the Planning.Commission held on the €1th day of duly: 1987' by the following vote-to,wit: AYES: COMMISSIORERS: i NOES; COMMISSIONERS: ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: , Ji I f a �r W Yi'm w�i a �.+✓G� as Yn. qR Gu+y� .....� 4. AVT22 p 4 9 OYlf OO t- 1, m4 1 yY•uyy O.C'Q' �T tl4::% lw .CYq . C.yy$6N GS gq+yyV ,� Ctla ..aq» S$ pm 0y � STYt ra: OS6�� {tf yM,,.s�i4(I.hY YC µbCyC� Y �cr i. syu =q � Nit—VIT pq, VCC�;'' pb Cp (� �y�,,, yy� y Y � LY14 N4� LCV. :� Sg 4Gft ,.� SY.w« Gcb. yyi. ��, g�� P�+��N rI@A �sz-aa's2c iC v8j . � C 3 Yay tit VbT-i fill ga K.2,9 K 47, l �`�." #ova. cb ry �y m`p"' o.: pia iO� �•' e p auY 45 p p ��^b 4 mod' p «s4`� ip k O tYy4 NYOCI 4�.gp J YYtiMS ww. '� Tom• Lpp / �g 2p"'4 6ngw�]� COY p tyd.b vin+w J � `S a /I ii N SU �Ow.`L NS ii C4 j^a+l©W wI— �/ Fly' py �ii y N�.p wpp+. CCrI- sis—w4•OG9 �t# �L Y.0 d_� L ��µ�4C'.. Orp �.% -2=..i U' yar ax---i. c 4=�j kz wrcSti � r o. c$ v b �..". = nI$. :gl.ri.Q`$�i '—`�—'` y u�e. rd , Q.. 7py^: w..�y LNf .pY Od4V^ ,YYY! AS^�``R! yN y oGLI C.4`y' +r�o ��.a a.�o.��v�.w ...o�p'o:^« oo$ P • 1"ve's+'. ^n Np. vor yQg� i �.N�. g.`• w M�aY �`" y �w�c# ''C�"s C yrr^fit S.`.YN ♦F. N ybw � ^m�• �.G Yb+p N •� gyp■ V Lqc. Y Z9 ¢isv • jw T� 9CCSJ"',Cp N.r 4t.Ny '�_. V„N��ppS yStL C6YC$„ a p�Y9 cc4^S G r� O (``HEM y� C1 p1{Y$Oaf w y1«9 &N Srii Y C pQ�pbs w p�.g 40$a Nyff l„�S= YRS.+NNtiV12f -H It off w � yY t,'Q p g E 6 R m r rb C m ~• 1 1 I 1 II 1 #i 'bR CLCC � pLp w Y S9py 5 ^Y� `! Y CMkap uyYl C•=..^+�+L py+bt . 'q Oi a9 yrQ. »9` � 4 Mra YY �O Lr4 y`Zal L C N'^ CgY C pQ Y•: d633�i �Y� 4 �� Ru.V� ��K•J"4c +y�Cyi �$V.Ysa 9 yys ,cQA M66O'`.rw�R y tci.{fa,�`f fU u�. Alai. l''CL ywN�CO�ii.v. MY YATw. Uv s 4„L A i y �d Y�o- p C V Y�•41 C pV aO. MMi yis� p `O ■ CH ST. U=' nyeyy ;,Yw 'N` g yi$pb," N`C is "* sn Cw0 �Ow T pYba` NCLs yO y� 4^V9 rnsMgrY �� yp��>i��ipa b4��tl� 94�Gxt pM Cp Cm G�4 yC • . C��eN �y.� �qC� O.l�Yy�PA'�^�w qr lC�.p C�.r. G�.Q�,^p� vi S CL ad GC1�^ xiGb� _a+�CaL �1Y�l II._9 wpw�gY1_�fN GYi1L ri��p, HAyp�C.6pi NsNp HUE { <'a aLa wwNG 1-r NY3 S�N.p NXi.j Sti .i.tw04�M�01..C•.!. tiS�.i NCB! 1��.C..�C.��.l - h /'- f lb q= goa8�=terra�,� ca'Ya� .. Ca$$. np` a ea si moo' be um ag. w Sc c .t. s m� 4 t P Y�V 3.OJ .N.....00CC I�gC��„ � Ott LLS IZ s i It- ., pug`+ ;{{n..�'.g, g,«.: ,w 4 - L gYM ag��` L—Mr y �f �w E a� m.mg$. t— aT�Lby .�"i n� NyV�O A-uy �lmz�G d qYq Y �6 m O. C i M yy _b 6h y6 R YY w N yy{yV9 L pp y Y q L V NCN N KN K4 NP l�wi <N 4.•n a011;C1'd Kq4 K p,M' Sg�� .�`4 vY �S N ��.lRi Cs ■��iNi7r cN� sa _ g�$ "`te k Sit :a *''+�i'sad8 $ e1z! TZ T6+ c vat x "� o •-• A < ' N •1 � S Y a C`pg. $w O^ p It : f+ Jx sit qYQ U i=w w 9N . m 4li.y w G^ 'O { 4E Q q yy OE NN 4,tiq� .' yq u 0w_ �ACGy wmig C��vTiip^y� Z�G.}Y.�� 9p y ^dMm u .p.WC +11 NC .C� C� g Y 1 3NC ieywy mx-`i c'� x� a uow ,�,� �`s � m^aLp• = YO^! _�M O �.p+Y 6 L'fr O LL C •6 Ry.fL W.YSGl460 Kw�+r0 "K�� ?. �yJN Y6N �C 4� < h+Ow.•Yl rtQ ¢ tNS 6Q�.Nu..�. J tl�� 4+. Y=�O aLO .OJT �ygyyyvY ` Y6y ,CgN p T. ..N � O1 YYa33Ci C_Nyyp2gu O` C {Va, d�.uO YN�. pins .l �YQ �qG� N�N. �. pa �� CG 1.YYH � Ci.• .. W LOC aLp,pC ^VxY CC J u ^gC 0 d p N S =1.1+.b F5 Y Y ^ �u O CCyyY CQ� N1tl^ rut A04i ^Y�RI ^yy aCCu1�. 3 W�a`` p Y+ L ��p A !�Y••�¢{� `O itl C�. •g � Onx �ib C Y.� per■ Ow9a C Hoag 0 7TJw ..'S�+''s h loam. a cd'Nar Y S Ny6yp� aa y ,TQ (a ss YS; J �GHi EN1 - yY NI uYH s;fIat IS lux nu.! N U N 1 Oy0 S r i et t E VZ a Y rip Ji `b` Y Yg `dun E G. Yoh + 11 _ g 172" "� r�rM Y 3L tl eqc y a1 '2 C�� pu0y ilk Y.yYJ >aN L nyy .N� _W.-. CA�=a p■ C YLy� .QC�.0 p uME � Cn.OW �L Y� �w ��Y� ��_N y ', y ptl ErYYC. N .p� tl9� q�p>1 01 C�Y.�O rs A r .cTC34 V tlN p�pEi`C A Cry. Na L�� ydMpp ¢N� " ..C.^ Y� CC M •O� O�pY'.Ar OCr ty9yc�}(iC lcV,.r C O �`41`OM V `M z' 9 L C 1 N L �>."u CCU Y pn,,, �J NNNdi 4Y■ .� "`` .J ■ H K tiU <O.l OYNppw C. W4p. 'C.6C YW W O i^� O y,pv 43 , r 01 LU b YY ■yy r�Q f ■[[[O 4 L GI 4 eSNy.Lrq y ~c asN `6 .� « .SO �'y H� +cam ? 2 CQ�^ 2d �- G��M rre � 0 NoW yyyy • _ {, •. 9.�. b ^ _� Y � g y Y�a��CC •�(#`�{t V L Q O �tlrW 4�► LM r 1 �d10.b� i�`(.. Grp r � • � I ( � ^� i W J 1.n va ra za all] _ r tl/NWT ` '35� � C� va ipt N� r ■ OY �� yN~�� O N M`� «ate � '`��. fal IpS O`. pO��y~ � Yrpp {a{.. i�►fs.oi�! p6 `^q J~pp.f46�-9}�7�1 w Al L l rN V�by` Oqy OY IL 1/I IM1 S4 G US gL. WMtl WYai i ��1 lsSi > i4y OOp . A a u I �, 1 y M 4 N Y w �61a4 �1 y CX-z ZN C - �.' ES •E ad LS Nr' 12 •� �� W Pp w +W MC�`. s �p 1! 4 4 r qN o �»9 101 b S �gy ;sea a� 92 S'�� s. '":► c� a` Y wr! � .4 a Y O1 a .•y2 V:i((S��qrr. aatu��y��C N SZZC NO �.►w <V C� W Z. C. i 4 ti p ti g afZc vL� AWL YYY t I .CN 6eU 9i� ■M It 4 I FIT J iV : .. • XN � r�C 4 k O�` w` D � • M� � ` M 3� C • ~qy: it V` NN NV NN �r ri S9 M. s�O �g N `'�tll C: _e+' w � Y _rw s M�i NG `hp o g <C L Yi� L �� R 4 Y 4 r""llr� `•�r j,•�l;;GWM C� M lam,q . c U '4 M Lille I �� L— st l 4 9 a� ax d s` LU a u O G v s� �t W M 1. 7 p 7 } 8 V 91L IL A4 at �a Msi a i i fm 4 if 0LG24 '` �Y �p s C M`� p Y q tl r W y y y{y y G~Yips tl.�..R �� g±�2 �y�yy r YY y��d 641.:.6 na Lc. w� w CCF 7 pp y yl CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 8, 1987 P 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner dY: Chris Westman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIOW.')USE PERMIT 87 07 - proposalo eve op a sq. . retail cen er including a 2,900 sq. ft. restaurant on 1.26 acres of land in the General Commercial District located at the southwest corner of Malven Avenue and Arrow Route - APR 209-041-49, So. RELATED FILE: „YARIANCE 87-05 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Re uested: i Approval of a CondittunO .Use Permit, site plan and a eva-,"s, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. eSurrounding Lend Use and Zonin or rtg a .ata y res en al; Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre). South - Chino Basin Municipal Water District; Low Residential Y (2-4 dwelling units per'acre) East - Neighborhood Center; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre). -West Jack in the Box; ueneral fommercial C. General Plan Designations: ProjectSite - General Commemial North o Medium Residential South - Low Residential East - Low Residential West General Commercial 0. Site Characteristics: The project site' is vacant with no signTficant vege a ion and is surrounded by existing development. To the nor`# is residential, to the east is the Neighborhood Center, to the south is the Chino Basin Municipal Water District site, and to the west is. Jack in the Box. Partial street improvements have been completed on both street frontages. I,l ITEM M Tr _ PLANNING C.O*TSSf,ON STAFF REPORT CUP 8O7 G? - Sark ssi:an- ; July 8, 4B,7 M Page 2 = E. Parlcing Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of User' F_-ootage Raba Requ;red Proyfded Retail Comm'1 9,100 1/250 36 35 Medical 111:825 1/200 g g Restaurant 21520 1//100 25 25 II. AmALYSIs- . A. Gene The pr(4ect is intended as a speculative infili ----.. erc al/retail property. the proposed use is consistent with the zonir:9 district in which it is located. The site design does not meet Parking and average landscaping setback requirements along Arrow Route. This issue has been addressed throu'�) a seprrate `�plication for a Variance 87�-0r found earlier on this agenda. B. Design Re lea Committee: The"esign Review Committee {ChitieaMcN1 , e , o emus rev sued the project on June 4 and June 18, 1987 and recommended that it be forwarded to the Planning � Commission with the following conditions 1. A det%il of the plaza area should be provided for review by Design Review Committee prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Brick veneer,. stucco, and flat concrete roof the were determined to be the most appropriate material combination. A color and material sample hoard should be provided for Planning L ission approval. 3. The plastic screed shown on the arcade columns should be removed. 4. Additional vine pockets should be provided to the west elevation of the medical/retail building. C. Environmental Assessment: Parts I and Ii of the Initial Study have been comp a an no significant impacts have been found related to the construction OV the proposed building. OM CtfP 8x%%al- i1st i7u July a, Parma i /r 1;III. FACT}, F[�t3 a�5: The proposed use is consistent enera ao ata.F oilmen Cod—, 'The building de5tgtt and site'` plan,, together with re^c:a�aended Gon4i�tirans ar:�Ip�p�r�vai, will not be detriprental to the R!lblic hetith, saftV, or svi are. at, materially �I inlarious to�,propertfes_or irp ejtemts In the ate, and aria in//; compliance with the Devel�opoent Code and ill other Opelfcable Gi Standards. IV. RECOMKWATXft St?urf recowwe `-fhat the Planning Co ssion approve Coffantonai Use Perar t 87-M and issue; a ilegw°ve n Declaration, th, ad4p�ion of the attacbed Resolution with Conditions If 4hcannot supp'rt Variance 87-05, ther;' ?, it xould be $I* Gate to approve the size plan for CUP 8:3w07 as svbrei�. 8 shoal^r then be direetod to prepare a Resolution o D 1 to �►d set for the xt Planni^rg Commission Consent C e r Agenda'-'or direct the apply rut to redesign. Res y su Cteeti, �8ra ller City fanner BB.CW:ns � Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map 1i Exhibit "S" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Elevations Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Resolution of Approval with Conditions fl � 1�I a' r sxr. itnwt vH iwe 4 �y��^--��F+f�I�(1•'tN1Nk 7MTI�Kf •`,�-'� WT f t � ana��aw laTY �- MN7Nlit J��.' jr` ar.44N4 � pt �' "' irLIIM NT2GT _ OYUiai`p'1ofAw— CITYOF CHO RANrr Em: CUCUMOT 'L "V tI\G DI LSnXEXHIMT:.-- -5CA.1.E=. " �. �.8. _. �G �6�� ♦._Ql .. lAH1t.i7m► -* ~� 'w�'{ �'.`aurori a t. ' �,:... ) �•r.1�-� ��'.� � iii_s�., • J�1 t,.• 1 .r }f +tr�lw�i v� •� '..I pwf+cl ��r;.�r�.j•�.'I.11 aj"Ih, r _ Ilk WNW i1f11Nl. . . IL -�M•tdt 4 r r� � �^,,,(ti.. •• r �L• \1 � a dt.J� N' ,!. •r Jr J.4.; tt2 ' • `� (If M 1.. 4 V. l 6 1 t ♦ s 4j.. y .. ow 4wityON - ___. II n 3 111 FlUlt/.�twt w'� 4 4 iwuw f?w wr n""S• - . y Izz rwa�awrwn� t��fA�YiMML1�MlM wow MA11 NORTH CITY ' RANCHO CUCA,%jojNGA, PLPIN1�TIi EXmam=.!�, scALE: _ r> �r r $ v 4 .ram__.• q ._� � �..} L� 1�f{91' Wit fAiH449AN'r: T — —�= •� "...... .i, t�'"1�.r �'}L�rr r'i..:� 1 err--.=` r� _ Nt.KTIf tt;VATSOH.{lAh1H 61f4iAtF!(,f aw+.ra�.ar r..ri,pr - a wrt kpW,p..w�crrr _ MaM{IM 1wl1FI L141( �2NflfYL:YltlR NORTH r, CE"LI Off' _ �:�� 77 ;< 4,,;. m w, 11^.w- -a• sr+r..Fp... uGt'm x 04,•tMaIM,aW - /J)w lWn. u111i +l 9 ol } a,n rrr rNxi44i 4/»M DW!/! arsuNP.urrE E.. M-ex•....r.N. 1 . � rwa+nn r4 AtA7iY Aoutt � .'V;+1t•Yd Ate tt MW f"w. l tut K°FY � t '� 'ttot7Nrcta.4 r� 9 � - Y ..""• ��`\I3. ,,,E IANGt�.711g1- WMlA1YaY;444l4AIN4. 411 0 jr PLAN wrn.tc.�q.+er,�a7 t vt\l H CIT, Y CjV RANCHO C ,,)CAz 'I�1'i'CA TITLE- PLANNIr. [XVISM � Ir At Jr - RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE, RANEHO�/CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDI'TIONAL, USE PERMIT' N0. 87-07,_, FOR A NEIGHBORHOOD,COMM ERCIA'L CENTER LOCATED AT THE Sr}bTHWEST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND MALVEN AMY UE IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT - APN 209-041-0, 50. 1 ( WHEREAS, on the 29.th day of -April, 1987, a complete application was filed by Krikkor Der Sarkissian for review of the above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 8th day of July, 1987, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning �. Commission held a public hearing to consider the above-described project., NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as fol I,-Ovs: SECTION I:' That the tgllowing findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, ` 1 the objectives of t-he Development Code, an&1he ptirpases of the district in which the site is located. /l1 2. That the 'proposed use, togethwf with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity, t, !` 3. ;hat the proposed use complies with eh of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. SECTION 2: That this project will ;lot create adverse impacts on the environmen an at a Negative'Declaration is issued an July 8, 1987. ' r-- SECTION 3: That 'Ionditional Use Permit No. 87-07 is approved subject to e o oKing conditions: PLANNING, 1. The plastic screed shown on the arcade columns shall be , rewaved. 2. The plaza areas adjacent to the restaurant building shall incorporate seating, textured hardscape, special) landscaping (specimen size accent trees, shrubs and group cover) and trash receptacles. ` 3. Approval, "of Conditional Use Permit Na: 87-07 is grantee subject' to the approval of Variance 87-05. Ssx[k .- 3. ENIN---- =1�N0`" I. "An,itfiu f tian to tef� reuftdron tTs, r u e : d;ngf eadt uttl #y de fi Ong overt .. . eUdb--1444 on' the Opposite •5dd of °Ar ,rt F o ap s�ia11 = tie .. paid toy be City prior to the nuance o bsai4l°d h ��, pe i sp The f`ee shall 6e'one-half the ikty adopted unit amauni '-times ttre t`ergttt�fi�tsa 'she cerster ,nf Mavern AWenue to tie. evt 'roper ty boundarK 2. }Entice; of itnt'ent`fun,ton fore and/or 4oin the Lighting, and Landscaping:altstrict shall be filed, with the City Council prior to issuance of buii•ding Permits. APPROVED AND Af O''PT£D TH`IS`8'fH DAY OF JULY, ,M7. ` PLANNING COMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ',-, BY: Larry T. Mcglel, ChFirman ATTEST: Bracl Ouller, Deputy secretiFy, I, Brad'`Ouller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the iity of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Comission of toe City of,Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planrfng Commission held on the ��th day of duly, 1987, by the following vote-to-w#14 AYES: COMlMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: R ABSENT: COM>MtISSIONERS: C4 j W. s. CITY Off`RA�ICffO G�TC.AMON+GA STAFF REPCIRT � O O ,¢ U > 4 DATE. ��., July 8, 1987 1977 TO: \,,£hairm3n and members of the Planning Commission FROM: $; d Buller, City planner BY: Scat Murphy, Associate PI anner� SUBJECT: ENVIROlEMENTA! ASSESSMENT , AND T€N,TATI'dE TRACT 13068 - - A Totalres n ai eve qpme ,nt of 74 s ng e lTyy`Tots on 32.6 acres of 'land in 'tht Lour Density Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre, within s the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the cast side of East Avenue at Catalpa Street - APR 227-071-01, 11, and 20. Associated with the proposal is Tt- a Removal Permit 87-+44 - A request to remove 270 Eucalyptus giobulas (3lue Bum) trees, I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION., A. Action ke guested: Approval of subdivision map, conceptual grading Pi an, conceptual landscaping plan, building elevations, detailed site plan, and issuance of a Negative Declaration, B. Project density: 2.27 dwelling units per acre. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North ani Urnns7ty residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South Vacant and Etiwanda High School; Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and High School East - Vacant; Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West Single Family Residential; Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling unfits per acre) D. General Plan Designations: ro ec bite - ow Density Residential (�-4 dwelling units per acre) North 4i Low Density Residential (2-4 dyalling units per acre) South High School East -\ Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) j West -�� 1ow Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre}..., iOWA p"" ;A �"FP�fnr, ' .'�,. P PF ANN6 COM�tlS x 1�kTATIr<VE°.�'� 1'd��;.3 July Page 2 ,, E. site Coraetvistics• The"property f;. urrentty undevel;opea wits an average.s.ope-of roughly 3 per-�en froth north 'to south. There are two si'gnificatct Eucalyptus windrows on the site, one hunnit'nf-eastt-west througk the, center- of'the site and one running nartlt-south along the east pm perty line,, ano three partial °w odrows Nnfiing east-west in the northern portion,,,of the ti.4ct.'he it Lots 1 t rnda High School is located aged direcy i south of the site j.The future �',pothTl Freeway, right-of-way is located -- I1. ANALYSIS: e r A. General. The'f,maplicant is proposing to develop 73 single Tam'rv'"Tots and a Comm Tot that will be used as a a temporaryaccess for emergency vehicles. The residential lots range in size from 10,33$ square feet to 23,,208 square feet in area with an average lot size of. 15,077 :square` °feet in area. In addition, the applicant is proposing four floor plans for this tract two single-story units., 1,820 and 2,041 square feet, and 2 two-story units, 2,3W and 2,777 square feet. Each floorAQ plan has three basic elevations. Plans 1820 and 2380 have been adapted to incorporate detached garages on corner lots. a. Design. Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Emerick, o I s ov, and Hui I er) .reviewed the proposal and ,recommended approval sub3ect to the foTlowing conditions: ` . Variable front yavd setbacks, 25 to 30 feet, should be provided through the tract. 0n Lot3 6-10 and 16- 20„ the front yard setbacks should vary from 25 to 35 l feet. 2. Lots 1 and 2 should be single story for additional f noise attenuation. 3. Along East Avenue, 3� single-story and 2 two-story units should be provided'. 4. Streets "D" and "E" should be redesigned to provide•a curvilir„bar appearance. s S. Decorative block walls .4hould be provided on all corner lists. JJ 6. A decorative block wall should be provided along the G,j. south property line adjaceAt-to Etiwanda Rio, School.. `fix+ < RI A INi{► 104P 3 N F"REPORT r' T..6MTITi 1GE TR1:�T°' d063, - C'ITATIOk " July,8, 1�98T Page 3 7. Replacement windrows - should be planted along: the north and south site boundar.e.s. 8. Shutters,: should be provided around the windows on PlAns 2041 "A" and 2041 9. A rock planter should be provided an Plan 2041 18" o instead of rock vee r. 10. Wood corbels under eave overhangs in the porch area should be provided.. 11. The front porch areas on Fia»s 2041 and 2380 should be expanded., 12. Wood trim ar plant-ons wit` stu&co over should"be provided around all windows, Tree Removal Permit: The applicant✓has submitted a Tres Removal Permitapplication requesting the removal of 270 Eucalyptust; globuias (Blue Gus) trees in conjunction with level-opment of the tract. An arborst report has been provided as part of the request. The report indicates that a majority of the trees (78 percent) are in_ very poor condition as a result of decay, fire and unstable sucker growth and pose a potential hazard. The arborist also feels that those trees that could be preserved by pruning may have additional weakening damage below grade. Based on-this information, staff recommends that the existing wir..drows be removed and that replacement windrows be required. D. Environmental Assessments Part I of the Initial Study has been- comp e e y e app can . 'Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist and identified that the proximity of the site to the future Foothill Freeway and East Avenue may result in excessive noise levels along the northern and western portions of the site. The applicant has provided an acoustical \ \ analysis addressing the potential noise impacts. Based on the results on the report, one of the following mitigation measures should be implemented to reduce the noise levels to a less than significant level: 1. A 511 foot berm and a 5 toot berm be placed along the northern and western tract boundaries, respectively, or �I t� , a PLANNING GOW#tS%,0fi STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE CITATI'ON July 8, 190 i ?U Page 4 AMk 2. A 6's foot barrier and « 5 foot barrier be placed along the northern and western tract boundaries, respectively. �, The barriers shoulO be continuous structures without gaps or gates and should be constructed of a material that is Impervious to noise (i.e. concrete block, stucco-on- — 4 Inch plate r glass, earthen berm, or any carat' nation of these materials). In order to cale),y Wu cArrent City policy and, at the same b time, to r6duce the noise levels to a less than significant t., level, staff re!iommends that. decorative block writs be constructed on the northern and western tract perimeters. h III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project, is consistent with the.General ian and DevelopmentCade. The project, with the added mitigation measures, will not be detrimental to the public health or safety, or cause nuisances or significant adverse environmental impaicts. In addition,,;the proposei use,- nd site plan, togetherC;Ath the recommended Londitions of Appj�val, are in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Wwanda Specific Plan, Development Code, and C'ty standards. E' IV. CORRESPOCE)iCE: This item has been advertised in The Dail,,-.;Report newspaper as a public hearing and notices were sent- all-4pcoper,y owners with7- 300 feet of the project site. V. RECON'J+fENDATi1N: Staff recommends that the Planning Cr.,mission approve en ati. ve Tract 13063 through anoption of the attached luti n, approve Tree Removal Permit 8744, and issue a Negative D ar on. espec 1 submi led, i2Brad B lei City tanner BB:SM:te Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "S" Tentative Tract MAP Exhibit "C" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit"E" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "F" - Building Elevations Exhibit "G" - Master Plan of Trees Resolution of Approval with Conditions " h S` i I �aF .- - . ♦�tv a♦ isa% .w wdi++w { I)J/ NORTH A4 EE*=- SCAU, rj AJ- x _ - ,-•-"-ram �r 1.4 it +1 r, NORM (IIN CF4041 ", _d r 4 'it A .N yy e e • - -- ..,,ter F� win ww , �` �� -L7, t t • 4A lot. 1 .� INd r L �� j�� , t � mat-„�-� ��' ` � ••�, � �' Now— vi •?11.:.^- � �._` ,J '_.V 7�f Y� 7-fie •;. ��r�i� � � � _" c � � pt i+.• iti.�f1� i f C it � 11 �• �} �, if ,f' — • a e a .t•y !�. L. 00 b=nTii CITY or S �} d t i; i � �' .:�e.._ r�11��• t r r age ° !/ aE� o fiVIA � o o �ti I{7. .ram ME till � rw-:jfvt ..... '��'• ;7dta�ifi�'t��ndr��` rr +p6.�S.na'a"�,.,.�,! �� ! r / • �[Ilii��riAr 1' Iniifl 1 II!!!Il(y[ i1lEa�gt y 11Hi111 ;pA1111111 LIII Ili -�-.r'�1C_ Il,�lilell'Jtf 1 �•aQ_��t,� 1 �'� '��.��' �. a i /. �5' 1 ire ■ ae1"d 111 g ti. aaw ;i111111 fill]1,11110i1sfmlim�less �,�. "T— tsfaJ#O;� �--•• '-"-- ems.. ��1 � -.1 # � �l�9��pQa!®te � g��pS� 4p��ay sr o' +(/ -� )�y• ✓"'S y,, yy tl yypp e� 41 out Aiir"e:� •. . �"4_"! ^ Ali #.tan y e i t 4/v1. 11 1f 1 u,l!l�q LAI w,on,!^/88:�'� PO j rya■ tltl' e� t S 1 Q L. }r■,169 �Ye }y� Af f4� ,r ra�s111gtr�t■/qr 1lF l�ttt66 1te11lsfMa�➢■p�g�1 Itt1lIlt1�. n � �441 »�l1---MjaII r:�aiir�1�. AFt�e�)'y �p {�„ `avt atiai+i• y jo F t . r Gk t Ile tt��Itt Y� . � �,� ii� re•F t a F % � i 7 �� -i ti ,�t. _..,.'may,.,,..— ,. wr a _ ` .v � •..r+ 1 Y S 1v CITY OF -_-��-- RESOLUTION NO. w A RESOLUTION OF 7A PLANNING C"ISSION OF THE SITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT K4,,p NO. 13063 4AEREr" , Tentative 'tract Map No. 13063 hereinafter "Map" submitted by i�;itation Homes, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of, *V Califarnia, described as a residential subdivision of 32,6 acres of land into -- ` 74 lots located on the east side of East Avenue at Catalpa Street (APh: 227_ 071-07, 11 and CO), regui'arly-Yame before the Planning Commission for public; hearing and action on duly 8, 1987; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approilal of-the Map subject F to all conditions set forth in this Engineering and planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning D:Tvision's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEL FORE, Lne Planning' Commission of the City .of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as foiloi�sd SECTION 'S.: The PlanningCommission, makes the following i i e i ng findings n regard to TO ve Tract No. :13063 and the map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with ki%* General Plan, DevelopiRent Code, and specific plans;, (b) The derv\gn or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the Type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damacp and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or ,heir habitat; j (e) The tentative tract i is nut lik 'v 4a'cause serious public health problems (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now- of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposes subdivision. (g) That this project will ;mot create adverse impacts on the: environment and a Negative Declaration is Y issued, i r # 7' PLAHhJ!IM cow;Mz xew�ESQLIIna No. l � V TENTATIV. TRACT I�?06.� - tTTATION J i w`r I July 8,. 1987` t Page 2 ; SECTIONS 2: Tentative Tract NV 13063, a copy of which is attached eoo,is hereby 4 s4ect"ta all of the following conditions and tine attached Sl,3ndard Ghc�o�tt s. Planning Division: 1. 'Variable front yard�A4acks, 25 to, 30 Meet, shOuld be providea;throughou�k the tract. On Lots 6-10 and r 16-20, greatir vao.ation, in front yard setbacks, 26 it r to ,35 feet, shall be provided. Revised site plans sh;'Al be reviewed apd approved by the City Planner prior to the issuanc�`of building permits. { 2. Lots I and, 2 should be single story for greater noise attenuation, 3. Along East ltvenue, 3_t,iatgle,story and 2 tuo-story units shall be provided. 4. Streets "D" and N�! should be redesigned\.to provide a curvilinear appoteance. The revised"tract trap shall be°reviewed end approved by the City Planner 10 prior to recordation o the final map. 5. Decorative block walls should be provided on all corner side yards and along the south tract boundary adjacent to Etiwpnda high School. In addition, a 6.4m foot dacorat€ve;;<block wall shall be provided alo g the northern tact boundary and `a minimum % fott decorative bloat waT�, shall be provided) al.on« t!e �f westorn tract btlundamp to reduce noise impacts "Co a. less than significant le�el.. The vocation and design of the walls shall be shown .,on the final lardscape�-�pian which shall be ree;ewc and pproved by, the Ctty Plainer :prior to the, issuance of buildintOermits. 7. Replariuent windrows (Eucalyptus iaalculata at 3 feet on center) shall be planted along the north and east sitq. boufdaries. The treas shall be indicated on the_ final' landscape plan !�[aich,_is subje+:f to the review and approval of they/C�ty Planner. ,; & The following items shall be incorporated into,the'. `Devised building 1:�at+s which shall be .reviewed and "approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits: p Ix . PLANk,144G - TfNTATIitE TRAG'p 13(} .';. �'CTOC� � July 8, 1987 V a. _Shutters sFi411'�be provided around the wind . on Plans 2u,4.1 "k* and 2041 b. Aerock planter shall-- be provided on aR,.,_204 c. Wood rNrhels shall be provided under the eave `}rr overhangs in the porch area of all elevations, 1 if d. The front shall be a porch r anded W. the'`ea of ¢atisfa tion lans 204i n 2 of the pity Planner. e• Wf� :d }brim or Plant-ons with stucco over sharp-be !rovided around all windows whe.,e shutters are - not to be used. En�c'�neering Division: 1. Overhead Utilities: a. Highland Avenue e - An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecomunicaiions and electrical) on the opposite sida of Highland �. Avenue shall be' paid to the City prior to app oval of the final 'Map. The fee sha11 be one-half the City. adopted unit amount tines the j t length of 'the project frontage adjacent to Highland Avenue. b, East Avenue - The existing overhead utilities� {telecommunications and !electrical} on the. project side of East .Avenue' shall be - undergrounded along the entire project frontage, including the "out" parcel, extending to the first pple off site (north and south), prior to Public iK( ovement acceptance or occupancy, - whichever occurs first. Partial .reimbursement of one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development ss it occurs on the opposite side of the street is - feasible from the presently undeveloped ,properties. 2. The storm drainage fees shall be paid prior to - recordation of true final map, Am ON No Al page � impra ents i.n front of tha eruct sires ', 3. The devil oiler shall construct . ` - out" ,aarebl on East', A•;eem)i �' the sa isfact�i�on of the City Eng�n r. 4. Lot A" shall ;5e desianed and eonstratted asp,> follows: a. To accommodarti temporary emergency VZ4cles frf5 _ Highland Avenue fict "Ij* Street, and b. To provide flood protection to Lots I and A.,-from overflow from Highland:, A14enue. � f 5," All off-site drai na,ge easements shall be obtai wa� I the satisfacti-ii3n of the City Engineer prii�r recordation of .the final y; 6 All aff-site tempor 07 grading easements shall /'e obtained to the satisfaction of the U_�y Engin' r ' `y prior to recordation of t�e finO map, 7. Notice of intention to form and/o; lain the lighting and landscaping district shall bt filed with the <: City Council'�prior to recordation of the magi or issuance of' 6ui ,ding permits, whichever occurs first. 8. Catslpa Street shall be::vanstructe ) to 6—r6ctor standards, i.e.> 66 foot right-of-way, with a 44 foot cue4i separati4h centered on the existing portion to � thee' east. g. The vier; ycaj alignment of "C" and " �" Streets shall be deli j-.%,.--to accommodate the futu* development of the property to the east. 10. Off-site storm drain facilities from the tract to Yzctoria Sash,_ shall be constructed as Ipprov,d by the City Engineer. The developer steallAbe e?igible for reimbursement of the e"t of cons Hiction of any storm Drain lines designated on the City Storm Brain Master Plan in :accordance with City Ordinance25. (lo. l Y ,__ _ _ ......_,.s _�_ ... ...:_lac._-..z..S';:.. ._ ,ks,w_..�....:. �• .`- -- - .'s.' :i _ �Ail:,� t PLANNING Ct1Mi'I.rM4 RESOLUTION NO, 4'• TE!1'i"A fYE TRACT 13083 w CITATION July 8, 1987 Page 5 11. The developer shall bear all costs incurred {including condemnation proceeding) in, the acqui'sitiorr of the off-situ right-df-xay required, € for storm drain facilities, if it is not acquired by some-other ss~u4 prior to recordation of the final map. An agreement tc 2h s effect between the j develaper and the City shall be executed prior +9 recordation of the final -'asap, 12. An easement shall be 'obtained fmm,, the School District for exaioage to then property prior to rerrordAtion of the final map. 13. The de- aleper shall participate in required improvements to Victoria Basin as required by the Flood Control District. 14. Provide desilting basins'for drainage f-om the site , i to the north as approved by the City Engineer. 15. The f1hal drainage study shall address all concerns i �mitified in the review of the initial drainage study dated My,' 1987. All necessary drainage facflities shall be provided including the elevating of pads along the I�jst tract baianoary a-s,required by the City Engineer.i APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS SIM DAY OF JULY, 1987. pLANNIW !DWISSION OF THE CITY OF RAKNO ZUCA14ONGA BY: Larry T_.-RWe , airman ATTEST. o lauller, Deputy Seci7etary I, Bad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Plann`�ng Cr misOon of the Ci*,y of Rancho C,,- wnga, cb hereby certify that the foregoing Resi%. ution was kiy and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by-the. PlanniPg Co=issi_0',i of the City of k�',cho Cucamo;iga, at a regular meeticeg of the PItAning i #.tsign held on the atti day of, '-,ly, 1987, by thR following vote-to-efts AYES: CA- NOES; C±OISSIONERS; ABSENT. =OWISSIONERS; r.. R� rX p p h ke 3...x. � f � RFffi n� Q x � n . O�,.y�S' V�p.� N�V9� wJ• 61� 6V ^�t. w Y6$ •sT,t�r...,� j.�fit._� c�� N. u�� '..7' s.N.A4 S�,�i—s!'�� Y rd�S•�e. ¢iii m ai'� 7 �i i�i =„A .t g I 3-Is •^ 'D v�«.ec N�a.., Val13 .:ffi-$sue°d+qY •-N■ 4 B '� w� o Ali rasp IL pyia.. rr e uYi p Y Y1 L Q v L LY ii asp r sixt n O h�Y Yi x y�j a . G Y.sS -yy=. O�wY,�s �2'r O O �' o �. C N �V//- N `. i G eQQ-q yN yy Qa I I Hi ®�i gyQs aw{y��, i'ML d 4Cp■M 4Yaa.. r "1 o Q b�.. t 4.4Y� VCVw Ay QwOyG� �pG.=i,�^� Ew. g ice,.ate a�. Cw! iNYw YY+e N{Y� G ayp. i '>� Lys r�Vl."(p ngaLlO w{1�// ` 4�GG_NYC1'VjY _ O• t�pL•i bC�`�ar NmA."' 0.�.�u • iV IG�" i b�v MJ.... 6 i b•� Cw yy� � b• �O 2 —asT. sore '� 'a ri�`.� as uIL a, x i S v �.$.a� _ • S Y �. «a1�� '�rw"` ��;.�a�s.�i� r.t ,.`a� A ■ i.Y.« 'J�'y 4�e3r 'do ra C6 wai Q 5 d=� N5 YY��^A a Ye G� �Va. R ga d$ ^Y t O� C ` �6S 4A"p Y �c ay.', ! g¢ tigg .�u'S Fag � • jgw ■gw g� �. r. _ vv p _ CN wYSim y N A O b y $ r ,. ao` ww a9.� y4= •S �..: .u�.�Ygy .a �" a c�v�•. b IL �i CNN lu .too i Y }, JU •[t�wqR aYV w0 is N w> Ya rx■r..N Y G"Va � • ry w 9Vtl Yam' '.' v tij yej-V y lag It.2 is Ell d•n0�. rs x� 3�p� � 1�1y�. •uy`p� r�^ 1YY� �rC¢�.�.�� yY'�^4,V =V 0 w Y v �a - Y " r9`"CM ' aa dew gV. �y�wY `t -s zeq' w51 N� iti �e. �wu ba d� tee= v�.�.Gr d� — `.®a.Z-0 a r k U8 N e�•� »� ,,; =p usc{a .d,�C o. ♦«e: e'.�t� ^$. �. $ •Q'y` RNA. "�ORLG ~w6 ri.2NC «wA V.Xi <.Y �,'c.9:` Y 9. a� o $o .irs r i ei �p�� IS aESEY^r qq II� e_e y yyy q L9zz ttL 40LO L'Ol� r 'p �� 1.:Mp i4 .9 WN 9 y� CG'y L^M � y4Vr+ ti� »Y zi �Y S R=N-!t6 C C Q g Ewa v.S t N ern 4 C a:. a i.�.: pc`� W»N Y�y Y,C CC� ,� y. �Ag ! »MO -( I v�0 %, CC t1C z-A5— ep dY CS rOda. L C ply. YY».N"pL�� u s `• Cs avd,3; 2 r L4�R g ff ^N,-,s C� y�'x� N. ggi �'$ $yp�{{ 73 lag 12 o u�.4 pN �w f ��; my�y abf� S{^.�aMwV�O«�'1! iy Illa yi LS �� Y�`C,C Y.- R0g1 Q aH M:.v. rw N9Y0yy�� Mi�.. YY »•� »+i`N•M i =Allk. x t ors L$�a a »� •L• aq� Xz uc� Yc Hit Sl R n 55�� 171 Cv YY S $:,ww, Y 4: �. = tea= ". a `:k4lb fps Yam-+ 'u g. `��6 « o.� $��p — .L s pyy212 . Yyr+ ` O ei G gg g$CClC vvu.^-3 t EIa �.. «p y�. cc:.► �l!... z m«ry Lw« « o``Y's�. . �.$K«'.. yp.> g..•�wyy yi� �4`Yy y ^ice YII4 I_ b91.}`7�s YY�.6.Y Zak k�c R « bIz Y YES i0 �g3� �G .oat ai'�� —gal. dd 3 y i Y Lr L YW Yam. � E`�. � ■ � Y�•W. �gU}E�� 4 ti Qp gyp ! x u a �p•w e� V. ��V u~� 2My— Y '� s'•' �pM, 1.9i.G��y p gill 14 na- N = f NCL V Irt1 Gw+ +5" �^O2 -2 3a. �` Q. yti ,�- z OG K3� 4�'S � a'w r �'� � ��wy �J Ah�_ .1�, .• 7� .. J y— s -•g gI. ia$ N rt» xd �. �6VC L�atL �Vi � i�'�-• �.KiV yMr -r=it� � O Q�a .. `-dys•"' r�C ate.a �i ..wd� � '� ��AM •� +g..g. s �. w �L�_ �a{Aa—IL ae a�wr. a _ +`tea Y IZ— r a wrcn � Ly c Q a�t LY'u o...yy w2$uk 'a r g is- d 7Crt -ate a'G ` Ga Y gff am4 o ..� ,Lu„O1.�N $^' "z gqa -'r a «yu1 'e ba # N.�w w.• 5.�ii `y;= ram i r3'iaa' .�a. A } p d O` C OL O!i �,. '3 tI gNC ��p O� � KMS� �� 4y� ��^� ea+wa pcy � �•� ..bL.W dQMp, .w pi JT�. C� g�CC �-• w16 �y}� NT o y C1■ dtt L yC� �y q y.K i'!!+ G.T Cw� by Nf.L+ as fltlYfr.� A"•�yG wY � q � -Ols � w s � '� Nw�' rp,. ML ANs• ��70 V L � we x.r� A C•�O�! ■`rr a Zie Y C yy V9 KY Ud eCtC O d K�.w=- —�:' ybya� Pee •�6 Li GM St LC .�: Q Cw L�+• < Aw'.A$e �Cza avK�'++"• u. WY. Ills- nor.,A u w M N A ' m 1 iv ail 33 Z 43 SE zo xi v `zswa V' ;'.' x S. Z p� p4 �' gall {i 41 pY Y h YL p 9. \ `. "' giYi qw �6y i' aKtYy`� Y r d O i� +• Vy.00� Suk a2.f3 cce `76Ci: N 43r u \`7> 1�y ' c g.� g y 2i d may, 'ids s �+��3 4sI p.gmf.L. h p r ZZ wp ta. DV .2i p�. l��'�: ou o.�r Y' e'e¢ `p 6 8S OL „M.16 = .12 a X� 1+ 44 I�:. �.. ;C r r r y V w ba `■ N.= 1. p_L S pan E ■q g� pe �� +i`Z u S a a a�� ak � a�a Mom. Q Y SEisn rY_pt i~p C.y9 MY Or fiy a = = NS E ?.Yr�yy[ `eato as r u aS w� 6pwc= Ctonir:� C 0 WN7 WYY �r N�`= `r 4M <OIV t0 ` M a 1? N M eI N �'! ♦ N 1p. 'i }} 9! MM 0_�i Y tl Y �Yy.. ■+C i u-" C L' j _ � ry`. `M 42 Gpp eO C i. tl w, "p � P•q. a O Lo IL •Tr0 �r :! R.r s 1 [ ^tl�y� p— s.s .i: ' � .'i��ucgyw�: w� 'v�' _� �• � 'rS�w S� —� Sir r'N w� .�. ` W S'ir .g 2 it H Y N \ l 32 w 1 �� sarY 1-0n !\�'f.•r sC C i O YA `•M �P 3::- 'rI N`,z: it �• Lt pY M.vI N- IL ya`i Vi ah 4] 4 C _ .7g �VVVS L e a, �. ib Y_ Y M tl M \fe( \ O Yi `1i �yC•tl i. O ija 0«O YO s`_C g•Np wN __ t Y•� T C am , S r�� pE�g`es tir_'ii1 t V W ► Y •C L � j333 N` f 0 u w 0 s. f; a 4; i f ' L 1 c.. L « 4 y q Y^. w 1 �. � Qyl�i •T,t��. O� t .yel!•ege ^�i w uy i C tCI trl� tt�$y` r`r {�C L a• (a � � t C��e' �T Gay �O`. �1i1 Ve Nil tl M'g !L W ya•4s ^ t.+. P Y !'��t= urr�Gp r rY �Vii 2.1 L� +2lt y _ g"n p ! f ww Ii. py L i iC.V C..sw 11 ! �Q¢ �+, ;`aras, T�"j'. �;,$ L'(�y. f '°qg• "q_� i� =a1 {. LYps SSA �{ y.+,� a ms$ f:` wa .� d 4Y 4 SSA YY g +'' _ S. = +C ri <G i•+` 1 Ld ail +CH f 9p i CITY OF nNCHO`WCAMONG& T AFF REPORT' L77 < DATE:. July.8. 1987 T0: Chairman and Heimbers of the.flanning Comission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Howard Fields, Assistant planner 'r SUBJECT: ENYIRON W,AL ASSfSSMEK',1AND TEWTATIVE TRACT 13541 - LANE a MellowHE OT a IC4 tovcus'T4M su 3Tui's o'3"n"on acres of land in the tow Residential District (2-4 cs" duelling vnits per acre~), 'located north of tied Hill .h Country ClubDrive at Sierra Vista - APN: 207-411:10 207-080-01 and 48. The applicant has also filed a tree removal penait. L I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCpIPTION: A. Acti_o__n Requt-sted: lApproval of a tentatiae tract yap and 11s-0nc� `Neg'atfVe Declaration. B. proei:t Density' 2.7 dwelling units per acre C. Surrounding land Use and Zoning: 1 or Existing s ningl a£ j residences, low Residential Distri4t (2-4 dwellfriq units per acre) South - Existing Multi-family, Medlur Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per,acre) East Existing single family residences, Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Existing single family residences, Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units `r acre) D. General plan Designations, Projecti't'e`—'Taw'H'side ial District (2-4 dwelling units per acfe) North - Low Residential District (2-4 duelling units per acre) a South Medum Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) East - �&Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) ITEM Q. .� • 177 • 4a •ga rya -s `�: "'..( •'wRt ; ; 11 PLAktt13Fi6.GYfFldtl le3ftF REPORT Tenfiier sae i - Lane JUTy 8, 1987' Page 2 _. .k E. Site Charaeterristjcs. The suhlect site is vacant and situated at. Tne upper ejT va ens of Red hill, sloping from north to south at 1ppx0Xiauate1,y S%. The site contains ap,proxiipateiy 12 eucalyptus trees, 4 henTodk trees, 2 juniper irrees, with scattered grasses and sage bushes. 11. ANALYSIS: A. General: The proposed subdivision is on the laege5.t remaining' par' ce'T�aloitg} the upper elevations of Red Hill area with lot sizes rangiite From 10,,02o to 20,445 square feet. Streaat improvemeni -will occ,ur on Sierra Vista to tied Jim, Country Club Drive as part of this development, thus improving area ` circulation. However, the completion of the proposed ri-ghtaof- ray for Sierra Vista Drive will create a nonconforming situation regarding corner sideyara setbacks (minimum 27` from curb face is requtred per Development Code). The applicant .- should be conditioned to resolve this situation prior to final .. map recordWom.. The existing 40' wide alley known as Honte Vista Drive I'll 1+ t. remain providincl rear, access to lots 1 and 2, and'llso all6wing an existing homeown6i, continual access. ` B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Tolstoy, Emeric er) or"T°g rally considered the propesal on May 21, 1987. At that time,, the Committee rostponed t4pL review of the project until several technical ,sues cou. be resolved. These items includede encroachment of an:;4ilsting residence into lot 'An, ar ess Prom Monte Vista across lot 2 and the provision for a turn-around area, and the encroachment of'a block will onto lots f and 7. r The applicant subsequently submitted revised plans to be reviewed by the Design Review Committee. The applicant indicated that the garage addition in the east side of Sierra Vista had been illegally construc2ed. The plans also indicated that a turn-around area will br', provided at the rear of lot 2. The Engineering Division reviewed the design of the turn- around and determined that some modifications are necessary (a condition with an exhibit have been included.-.in the 'Resolution for clarification). Yn assessing the reiiining issue, the block wall encroaching into lote:,6 and 7, the applicant has indicated that the gall will be deaolished. a ,. pwc cowssrow 5i'AFF REPORT Tentative Tract 13" - Lane July S. 19$7 Page 3 Based on this recommended apprav� of the' the Desfign )ev 'ei� Goaeefitten; issues bE ng resolved by staff.-Conditfionscareti chided infithe Resolution requiring completion of these items prior to recordation of the final map. # (C C. Technical Review Committee: The Committee reviewed the oraposa an rt�toen s approval subject to an in-lieu Q¢ds contribution to;the future'undergrounding of existing overhead utilfitfi s (=el&Communications and eTectricai)_ on the opposite (south} side-of Red kill Country Club Drive. 'fie fee shall be ' one-half- of the City adopted unit amount times; the length of the project fron)�age, D. Tree Removal: As part of the development � ppTicant has submitted a Tree act va o Pem t application for the proposed removal four eucalyj Us trees, four hemlock trees, and a row of juniper tram '^xtendfing approximately gD feet. All of these tn�es are within the right-Of-way for Sierra Vista Street and will have to bir removed in order to construct necessary street impravettha+ The applicant is proposing to preserve the Mulberry and e',,ght eucalyptus trees located elsewhere within the site. o E. Enviromentas Assessment staff has cosgpleted the initial s u an as a ermine at'`t,�e project will not presort any significant adverse 'impacts UPMu ,the environment. Therefore staff recoweerids that th,2 Comoitfsion issue a Declaration in conjunction with the project approval. Negative /~+ III. FACTS FOR FINU'RGS• The findings listed on the attached Resolution are suppor a yd'6"iie following facts: a. The proposed subdivision, in conj'unctior, with the conditions of . approval, is consistent with the current Development,Standards of the City. b. The project is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed number of lots within the subdivision. c. Additional street and drainage improvements will, be provided 40 make the project compatible with the surrounding area ^;+d Improve circulation and drainage in the vicinity. d• The project is., consistent with the General plan and co Districtnforms with the Development Standards of the Low Residential in which: the site is located. I 0- � Y P �1F 1tEPQRT IV. C�1RRESPO Mb �8, t i a°has be advertf sed in .The Da �J port i nesspapEr anrTTr?Qfc�s, ire; sent for a�ii ;prcaperty avers m , of the sob site. �a d rics correspondence?have been rec6yed V. RE�Ot ifil4 i Safi -r cota n s that the Ritann�!n CbmWwW— n apprc►�re> enii Tract 335'4 � tlp±aur tip adoptt� o .,th� ,isched Resai�gftcanrBtit�nss app'ra5ce 'Free RemonialT Perms 8r74 hnt ; issue e A"t an It shau��adE be �ed� tttd�t �er' tin, map Cann , ar fed "UMU'l all cand5� ns of e�Ub inci.odi�n ►cees fig R#suiati� , of the encroadh 2�4 tback iss . are satdk�.. Respect+9ACiy su Brad Buller City Planner 'i BB:HF:vc , . � attachments: €xhibimiR "AW' - tfte Uti'iizatibn t9ap Exhlhft "S' - TeotatiVe Tract : Detaii.ed Site tridng Plan Ekhilrit '00' Tree Removal Plan Resolution of Approval with Conditions �1 4.1 ,Al „ 040( s ... ..-�:xs. ;�..rm,...:ls�-......,L.'av�h&c��.� '.,L....x.W.,c. -W_. _�. _. ,-x_. �t•::4.�i ,. s. :�x�i.. A i 14 q vJM1A vim f scan vwta � o a i # um ZTM vumm CITY Of. MEND � � t ll MOON 0 r. 1 ' � V ` Ij ta K S 67 7E� ,1,.is w�aa� r�..r _ ry it jj Flr� aq 10 r ... 1t �e E is 1 ; 1 4 t tit T^ t 1 a 's 22 RED riS 1 1 'A69 ma 2 I9 %6W✓ N,rIM r.� 10 wwµ1 13 « Rf Dp ! yS�Gi3• POFIrKXq Ap 4140 b OgA^ j i CITY Of. r R s �;RANCHO CLC� , TctMI ��-,�►,�, AkMNG MOSON , t i` t{ t �• a =-- 4 — Aft y M � ,✓k Coul UAW �' +,i i .,... _ .:` ,!•... .. . "fix { ff f 4" i r CITY Or, R.:&NNING DNODNEXHIMT= C Q •\'� �t ± p�) `mil R -� u • t �_` •••� ice~•! �>x nr ;. r r e `�"•� l. � �L,�`�S. •t ram`°'.`t�}' • W cxis C NOF � �T � ITF FXHIW _ r RESOLUTION NO. ?� A RES010ION OF THE PLAN NYNG CONNISSION OF THE CYTi' ICCF RANCHO CUGAhlUNG14, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVIj TENTATIVE TR9,'T NAP NO. 1354i - APH: 207-if3; 10, 201 = : 080-01 and9.` WHEREAS,, Tentative Tract Map f No. 13541, hereinafter "Nap",,submitted'' € by Allmark, Inc., applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a residential 'tUbdivision «,f 4..3 acres of Ian into 12 single family lots 'located north, ofRed Hill Owitry Club Drive at Sierra Vista Street (APN: 207-411-10, 207,480-01 and 48), regularly cime be{ore the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on July 8, 1981; a:: M'HERE,�S. the approval of the Nap sub;ect to all conditions set forth in `ti a Enginearfog and Planning Division's s. reports; and f WHEREAS, the Planning ' Commission has read and considaredA the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered rther evidence presented at the public hearing. r NOW, THEREFORE, _,the Planning Commission `'of..the City of Rancho � Cucamonga does res.5Ive as,.1611o►+►sr III SECTION is The Planning Commission makes the following findfi:gs in regard to en a eve Tract No. 13543 and-the ( p thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Dpv�lapment Code, and speciVic plans; t _ - (h) The d ` ;;I!Jmprovemenft of the tentative tract is consisi, `h the general Plan, Development Code, and specs., Bans, - (c) The site is P Aid,0 ly suitable for the type of develop"Rt proosed; (d) The design of t'te subdivision is not likely to cause substantial er,+irorwmental damage and avoiaable` Injury to humans and wildlife or their i:abitat; (0 The tentative tract fs not likely to cause serious public health pi-oblems; ` (�! The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easemet�'t acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or "Ose of the 3.. property veithin `he proposed subdivision. V, ii �9, LikHNitr i 225G11T�? r Ten�ti'�re teA.,�t S354uS 1't � �' �' July 8? I9 Page 2 t91 That this pro *t wfi,i not create adrrerse i�-0aMs on the O VI Onment, and a Negative Declaration is �r tied _ SEC'rAR' 9% Tentati;ij Trn 't eta �o 13 4I a cony of whic�r is a ac .ecE: ' he're*op s 'ere y apirroor �su&llect to �'t`� of the foll&ring cold tibus and the attached Stanaaki(tondit ns: ` am in4,ien fee as cookribation togyp'"-fetuee uneAr,: Ad1,ng of the existing overhead 'utit.ities``ttElec aun�cawidns and electrical-),; kk tie oppos.tte Csauthl side'of lid . *11 Country ClUbL Orive shall be pod to the City prior to approval` of the fee shall be one-half the City, adepfied unit amount tiros the length;Jof the pmjec� frrontaga. " 2. 60tice= of intentian. va ;or$r and/or Join the Lighting and Lanft:aping Dist-ict shalt be filed with the City E:euveil prior to recoHa-tibn of the final map. 3. Sierra `vista Straet,- ' a, provide: 30 feet of &,ditation measured #r4 centerline (60 feet total), f a b. The prehoserd,lets A and g shall be eliminated, C. The portion.`af the existing building encroaching into the proposed right-of-way shall be removed prior to,recordation of the final ;reap.' d. Eight finch curb and gutter per City Standard Drawing No, 303 shall be used. . e. Sidewalk shall be located 0.5 feel from the right-of-.way line along both sides of the street,,'..except as otherwise approved by the City Engineer for tiie portion from lots i and 0 to Red Hill Country Club Drive,.: 4. Monte Vista; ^rive shall le improved to alley standards including: a. Sufficient addittiion;LT pavement to provfaa' a total width of 20` for the length irr the tract frontage, b. A mini:mura 0.1 f(sat overlay of tl'o western portivA of the { existing pavemenop: to the concrato ribbbo gutters C. Maintain driveabr,U access td ti,- property a the r _ �. m ._ ._ r,'. .&Ikk TO pt'i4i:a E- r f R Qctend #sx aT1z +,°aQrosr Tct''2; kOd. `j. other app t IIY-0 � :` - 4 1 -a 6 and. "'Si A'T'be pr�ortrtiscedE tie ria to Pm, of f nce itisd shill be..so Y�otctir fitt�. S'Agra10", re'r-44 4tor of fine. map.. APPRUME-D A14 94FTErz,WS erlI IWAY -OF JULY, 10871. PI.Alit�ING COWISSI�OF THE CM OF MMUD CUCAMONGA { BY: arry �, ATTEST " Brad sules,��, ptt, rearY AOL I, Brad Bta�ler, Deputy" Sk"mtavy of the P-t`annitg�Comftsion of ire City of Rancho Cu4monga, da heresy certffy is t� the irane'd0ftZ, ResOWti,on was duty an,d rep'lar�ly inteeduged, paesed� and adopted by the PTann;',ng Commission of the _ City of Rav ho Cucamouo,4�,-at a ,uI; e .. ,of.. Pl nnIn on the Sit ft of July,, '1987, by a fbT7,om g Grote-to-wit, g Co afissi°on head AYES: CWISSMD ERS: - NOES: C"ISSIONERSa ABSENT: CMISSIONERSr 1 �t �. t`v C ?F.,vn . -21 Ifs r to Zo s'® Loi- �I RANCHO CUCAM 311GA - s.- ExG - ! alf kg" vim " - l ail V } o Y40Y®L'�iaA•i. G v 'D�V � �� ! OG `L l ge �ty`s61k'� }{ i�o aV. YYY Mh ui 'Es Ij � 1C—„` gg>o��6or.*� • �—� � �—� ate. ,, L�r . �a.� ;'..E Mu 4�`+= Qgy�— ��L�`� Gam+'.. k* �.F�,Y 4YY3 L�_• k�sZME s 3 oaf 33..33' i a��w. m gi $. . goy ewoe . � � •• = �'o;+'"g�`$gar# a«i lq � �g , � �• k wwb�vaa Me et a I � is ..=— aA 46 it • � �— =i 'i I I 4( 4n, UXX 8 .<» to Y L ,j _� 11_! 9604t�i 9y4.:`N04 ^C ey-!`4 y 49 N L CC ntlsTiL: .+.'"°'� ,.: .w na"g a��" +. $L,N.L vMJ i +isV -L%��t 4Yr VQ Yy MY Y' W N j w =.ALpC f ti a 4 YYpa 1.3G yP• <y v O x Y Y OLL Y p.Q.pp�.Y 4 N M•�i. a 1C � y1y»c 4�.a_+ N.; R.ilYty�.! O�N� �qrN 4` Vp^� tt1 �. qp^N i yM �py CA■lg4RY �. 1JR 1 .1 Yy1 �„yiiy`6t3 p f +Ys JS..•. R A W%K NyM rii®.Ya y1t'.a L CN LTZ n �i,Ca Y. Y6•'��s� s4.+� _��p�N ��V7i 6�p� ��9 YL �ra� 9 s $AA ...+`8+.y S1�q'a �'yS �tYSu1tii�� 4`ajY+Y� +�� TV all 6tVy� �YY� yuY iIIYy�, y�, _ V�K `si 1�,{1 o{N. �Y !� tom.��g•+wii '� +• 14 N.Y hNMi...aMcc�lr¢$ I 1_y�` ++1{ V ay.`� •IG II t- N WI �i Lim - !aaitrJ a Ups 11-1 Im. zz = syy s v N t pq oil S ILM Li ex 41 0 JAI ,ii yp Y^�lr ;µ. Y i� •I�i�S ��} �yMy�Y r�M + `•�Y..�6'�t�� a a�iA�A w ..d .. tW d�J V Y q CD za 41 ;s V- yqg Z a».�.. �.::= .. +�N ��. m',�.e�S"'i»yea "vl«a�'. yyc •iI $Weis f 7 �yV.. .M CD U YCyx GOT s- �JYN1G ►•~$YN itlt ♦ AyY�1`L �w �uM. y y. Atl b o2W-3gk- EN�y os $ '� 710 ��'� 5i � s i—g54 g'p t' r g A. :c 2ii$» •4 no �� 4y4$g is par �Y FgI sra 3y$ ii M y a Orml. g 1 $'g4 JA ac�` i��y qw� psi■ � �_ ��1�� qk �� - S— ! a L p8.. Sty' Va—w. W i �Ra. ' ®aC.— Mtl •.• tJ Oy b.N M.�� ! �YNd`Y .� pyC�� yy �•� E � - �r4I s!J,� Aptl` y 1_. 22 If CC a jai xY � ` -g Lei ,� ,.s _� sya3 �r ilk 41 ali'! yam:`. .fi 's 7n+qy ,x _ iii■...'M� Ir ! atlY _+ �Ar. fiIV f�+ yi sit-. as 0 d1 ,,G�bb y�� My'1 l y I piv 'Q' N 1i /� G V•� N wl T .y3 SST � m�,rr �� M*r g= _sN � sg3 �� ask -�•�� "I, as S. _ Yix1I f1)1 tv Use An QµIS— �•Ni YY �.w !. 4 �{* �.��f.� «� .OfY Ni_M y> O jut I JIGS aii9E— Zak = e fie"1 ^ �� ~y ( O M y N Al at bye, _•�� i i a �� $ � <MS= �� ak '�� 22 +-�: « • s k� � 44� w� saw •■ .� -• .s 4ma • .Z . tea. >A. i �• �r,�.. � :`-_ii � fir' S ga i Y:x i Iltr� r wY SOY ■y¢i ,)y� O^ • `^ O T4o r ,. IS� Hit ii t 3r _& � xm- to �i; at r 13 In =Y S. Y t r 9re7 a• $ 8 �F_ 9 Si! $33! 473 133 Fla, its; �.5 Ali Plil ill JDall '41 lift F a V .l 3 ZW All $� S s 8 =i; . g IL + ! a No •�Y• A� iss o D� Y �Yl w � <N' V �r • ��W i6 Og` Suer 4 Sa as a„q'8a r� ke jr`Y yW xl wx �. g O.Y�2-, /Ct y o N1 Ell YN p` u 3� � �� `� N•"•bo3 53 _si3o�N.2 10 a `;» s� 3 s %! .. gay . _ 3t iy u� \ _ i E- M� �S M�{``a �� w1 Vy■� aY� gW�6Mf �C^� s_ M•V• f. W � i� � aji �>*ice ~�� ji Mn. .A .N. V�p `�_ � <Yr. Oi fin'`► �.�w a� � +'� Ni ry�'®u' r "' .A:w Nam•• 7Ea �¢i p�b 6�� vl �� ear ;^ aei S N a all mg Aaa 1( `i 1! 1 t X SO. -1 aL irk AM. r b w ILI ff � q Y I 9 ^ M w w4 .� F . M�Vi NS�^ y ^a6 ► ^O � YC�i �V.# Y �� =i�+ ►Y. �M�p &y �� .. V'��, �q^ a rp'N „,�.. 5-- Is SM $emu, NlN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA car STAFF REPORT 0 5. jll Z DATE: July 8, 1987 ton TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Warrent;associate Planner SUBJECT: ENYIROMMfNTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE FOOTHILL BOULEYA99 - o rev ew an cons r a recommen a on far cer T1' -c-ai:ion of the Draft Environmental Impact Report fart the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan project. The Specific Plan consists of detailed land use regulations and standards for the development along Foothill Boulevard between Grove Avenue and Haven Avenue, between the I-15 Freeway and East Avenue. rr %> ABSTRACT: ThR Planning Commission will boll a continued public ear na to consider responses to the draft Environmental Impact Report'(EIR) for the Foothill=Boulevard Specific Plan. This report summarizes the environmental issues raised in the response, and recommends the mitigation measu,.Ls app6pviate for the degree of concern or, impact. II. BACKGROUND: Public hearing on the eWronmentaT analysis began on une 87 with a N 6 ing Commission review of the significant environmental impacts of the proposed. S'peci€ic Plan. This was preceded by a 45-day review Period of the EIR by interested mcies. The review period established by the state environmental e'rearing house ended on June 26, 1987 and the :project consultant and staff have reviewed all responses forwarded to the City as of June 30, 1587. State law requires the City (as the,lead agency for EIR review) to respond to all environmental concerns raised by the public and other 9overnme�t agencies. The following issues were raised during the review period: 1• Student Generation - All of the school 'district., in the City stated that there would be significant increases in the student population as a result of the plan. (Addendum), 2. Land Use - Lewis Homes raised concerns over the amo4iit of _ commercially zoned land proposed by the plan. (Exhibit Re) r ITEM,PrA , a PLANNING COMMISSION , AFF REPORT 1 r: Environmeniaal Impact Report .� July 8; rq 7 Page 2 ,. 3. Red Hill Country Clwb-Drive Realignment The City of Upland expressed opposition to the proposed realigramggnt re Hi3l E3 Country Club Drive to Grove Avenue. (Exhibit " ) 4.,:, Air Q+uaifV - Concerns and potential mitigation measures_were provided by South Coast Air Quality District. (Exhibit, S. Circulation - Cal Trans commented on the proposed public right- of-jay improvements and traffic control facilities. (Exhibit III. DISCUSSION: - Staff will address responses to the above mentioned concerns as formulated by the project consultant. Student Seneratiom ., During the writing ,of the EIR the school districts were consulted regarding the potential impacts on the districts due to the Specific Plan. This initial investigation resulted in an unexpected student generation,figure of 11,000 above current levels. This figure was base;_-upon oistr€ct generation ratios devised in response to recent state legislation which requires school districts to accept as students the children of Parents who work within the district boundaries. t r The Commission requested additional study of this issue, completed by the consultant in the form of an ErIR Addendum (Attached). The Addendwq_,investigates the basis of the school district generation ratios'atA it has raised significant questions. The project consultant has determined that the ratio double counts a large number of student gener_tion factors (i.e. parents who both work and live with�t the district) and also includes a number of land use categories not V,ciuded in the Foothill Plan to provide-an unueighted average of the student per employee figures. The addendum also contains a revised student generation analysis by fine tuning the school district ratios. The study concludes that the implementation of the plan will generate approximately 2,350 y new students at plan .build out, not 11,000 as indicated by the i district's formulas. 'This figure, when compared with the build out student levels under existing development provisions is reduced to Mly 1,300 students. The impacts of these students can be mitigated by the state law authorized school impacts fees. All of the school districts serving the study area currently assess school impact fees for new residential,.and commercial development. That following measures are proposed to mitigate l aeirs impacts of the proposed project: I PLAIlNING Cow- ussioN STAFF REPORT Environmental Impact Reg,. { July 8, 1987 Page 3 All residential and commercial developments within the study area shall day the legally established s,foois impact fees to " the elent¢;xary and high school districts ' a effeot at the time of dev topmenta Land Use `The Lewis sms comments tenter on the amount of cizcercial land and a concern that this may depress land values, ,.; thereby dictating a lower quality of commercial projects. The issues raised to support their`=conc. rn arA as follows: The company 'fetter sites "the nearly doubled amooUa, yf needed commercial land" as part of the plan. This statenen =tivc;-„t___._ ieflect the actual increase of ;ca gmerciai land along the corridor. k( Present Draft Y General a ecific Plan Plan Difference C Commercial/Office 262 346 acres` h84 acres Residential 226 180 acres ..;.acres j Industrial Parr 84 45 acres -34 acres Other 7 8 acres + 1 acres In surdary, of the 84 additional commercial acres zppreximately 37 acres are from the existing, Indiis4rial Park land east of the I-15 Freeway. Lewis HOORS pointy out that CEQA requires a discussion of "secondary impacts" which -include the physical effects which may result from changes in economic con�i ions. It is iewis Homes' opinioh that construction of additional commercial projects would adversely affect existing businesses and cause a phy,eral terioration of the established downtown area. It is important to note that CEQA does not require examination of fiscal or economic Impacts; CEQA requires an assessment of physical,. effects resulting f:Gm economic conditions, As regards the Foothl.11 Boulevard Specific Plan, physical effects (such as the deterjoration of existing commercial centers) could potentially result from an "oversupply" of retain or office development. However, it should be nosed that this potential was recognized at an- early stage _ih ttv development of the Specific Plan. The Economic Consultant''t analysis, which was included ii the Background and Analysis Report, concluded that if adp.�,)tional commercial development were proposed, a marketing lgram to attract patrons from outside the City would be reO,ed. r� Y' PLANNING COMMISSION.STAFF REPORT Environmental Impact Report ' July F, 1987 Page ' ,5 . That i_, ,while,,it is recognized that the amount of commercial develapment proposed could not be suD��ported solely by Rancho Cucamonga residents, it can be supported by a combination of local residents and persons"from.other cities travelling along the state highWay. A similar situation currently exists In th(', - ' City of AofitiUtlr, which could not support the Montclair' Plaza and other commercial development solely through the patronage of Montclair residents, but which relies on persons from a regional market area. ; .' It is our conclusion that the added coo%rcial land will not. adversely impact the physical envrrrnsmient and that the improved F dQyelopment standards in implem ntl!ig regulations will aid-ih the coommrciai develoMent, fl The planning Commission shouR open thW discussion up to the public k and provide staff with direcCion on this matter. Air Quality - The South Coast Air Quality Management District recommends in addition to the mitigation measures already provided the establishment of a Transportation Management Association (TMA) to help business work together to provide reduction programs. Staff concludes with this approach and recommends the adt'tion of this mitigation measure to the implementatioxi section of the plan. Red HiiT Country Club drive - The City of Up`.and's comments on Red Hill Country Club Drive realignment necessitat,,A further study. As a result the City Engineering Division has ',,nitiated a traffic analysis ' of the realignment. ' Much - of the work has been accomplis►ied but the portion of 'the` analysis _;dealing with signalization of Foothill Boulevard with a Red Hill Country Club_ intersection at Foothill Boulevard has not been completed. Therefore this item should be continued until the study completion and included in response to Uplands comments. Circulation - The other traffic issues were raised by CaiTrans. The' convents ►gip-e received on date June 30, 1987 and detailed responses should not be formulated, as of the writing of this report. Again these concerns should' be discussed at the next Planning Commission meeting. All raffic and circulation 1 ues would then be addressed at one time. The planning Commission should open the public hearing for discussion on thesa items prior to their continuance: r�f �� ya � d hr is.recansendQd that-the- Riann, Cent°ssion a ee W cp- ©rats th re$pdRVks contained .fq tals raporf rela i �sc ot' gene a-V on,' land use, and" � quoft� firtty the �a itnu tiles iem for discusthn of,traffic.issues tlo th6 ;.-4 7 Mek: Reap f s toed, cry d ull*br :A -. it Planner r BB:AWtvc u ' a� - , y y, _J r, e; f II • LEMS HOMES t y 3156'Noft Mountidrt Ammus l P0.Paz:670/UptcncL Cabtoenla 917951714 99"71 June 25, 1987 —RECEIVED-- +` CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Larry McNiel, Chairman PLANNING DIVISION City Planning Commission JUN 2619$7 City of Rancho Cucamonga P.v F= 807 AM I'm Rane•hc Cucamonga, CA 91730 `�t�t�t�lulEl�l�l31�l5t$ t ' ire: Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan k Dear Mr. McNiel•, I` . The following comments are for the Planning ;�,'ammission's consideration, relative to a couple of very 'signiflen t issuer c7ncerning 1) the application of the Drai't Specific mans' withinity Design criteria to the areas east `of Haven Avenue within the Terra Vista Planned Community; and 2) the economic impacts of adding more commercial land use within the Study Area and its econo c effects upon the entire Foothill B our Iq ' evard a corridor. First, Lewis Homes is opposed to extending the Draft Specific I Plans Community Design concepts to these areas East of Haven ,, II a Avenue, within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Within the Study Area there are activity centers which lerd themselves to i the HP-ritage design concept. However, imposing these historical design elements to any•area east of Haven would be contradictozy to the Downtown image already approved, designed, and buill, in this area. In essence, this portion of Terra Vista has defined activity centers and parkways at Haven and Milliken similar to other key intersections within the Study Area. These key intersections in Terra Vista, along Foothill Boulevard have been defined as gateways with special site planning, landscape, and architectural character in keeping, with the City's established Downtown or Towncenter image. In view of the significant design analysis and action already taken by both the City and Lewis Homes, we feel, as did the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce and City staff at the beginning of this project, that thesF: areas which lie Outside the Study Area should not be included .gin any recommended community design program for Foothill Boulevard.. Secondly, we are concerned about the large quantity of commercial P— i^ r;. June 25, 48"_7} Mr. Larry McNiel Page 2 land designated i! the Draft Specific :Plan. An oversu .ply of commercial land in the corridor will have major economic, developmental and fiscal impacts. The pattern of �'bmme.rc a—' 1 land developmer;t under:these conditions oL, land oversupply are apparent in the corridor presently. it is, our opinion that these patterns are likely to continue with dltect economic and fiscal impacts to the City and property owners. , The principal eco?,paic impacts of commercial oversupply are the resultant low lan prices, speculative development, low quality goods and services, and the consequent loss of retail sales to other surrounding cities. The principal developmental impacts of commercial oversupply are the fragmented an3 lower quality development in the corridor. This type of growth s.011 undermine the feasibility of retail centers and reduce trio benefits associated , with contiguous commercial development patterns. The fiscal impacts of commercial oversupply are diminished municipal revenues and increased costs as evidenced by lower property tax, lower retail sales tax _ and inr`��eased infrastructural costs and consequently increased redevsllopment costa. h In summary, we 'Feel that the City has shown good judgement in allocating ebmrsereial land use at key intersections along j Foothill Blvd( However, the addition of nearly double the amount of needed commercial land is a serious mistak,',,. and will have serious impact_ to the community. We recommeni' that the City conduct the appropriate fiscal impact analysis for the corridor as part of the Environmental Impact Report process prior to recommending any long!, term policy decisions. These issues reflect secondary impacts which: the CEQA regulations (see, e.g., 14 Cal. Admin. Code 15064 (d) and (f)) require the City to review in light of the recent Citizens Association for Sensible Development of Bishop Area vs County of Inyo (1985) 172 Cal, Hipp 3d 151 court decision. We concur with the court that economic impacts of long term planning decisions should be completely analyzed. In addition, a detailed retail market analysis to determine the type, amount, and phasing of commercial retail demand for the corridor may also be valuable. We thank you For this opportunity to provide input into this most 17 .d n Tune 25, -987 � c — ? Mr. Larry McNi Page 3- important city planning program. Should you have"any additional questions, .please feel free to -call me, or Rids Gomez at 2.y time. Sincerely, w Ralph M. Lewis Chairman of the Board LEWIS HOMES OF CALIFORNIA cce City 'Plann'ng Commission Mayor and City Council Brad Buller Otto Krouril r RJG:sd I I ' 1,J t l . a ;% TI CITY OF UPLAND 4y of qwclous *no 460 No.Eudl*An. P.Cr Box 460_ f� land,Califomia'31784 - a (714)9$2-1352 r - r 23 June 1987 •- " CITY OF RANCHO 01UCAN1,oNGA PLAt4NU`10 DIVISION) Mr. Otto Kroutil juq 94138 City of Raticho Cucamonga p� 9320 Baseline Road �$1�J110iL'tilt1 ►4L16 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 9170'1 ' Dear Mr. Kroutt':l. REF: FOOTHILL. BLVD SPECIFIC PLAN DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT k The City's Planning andr,Engineering Departments have reviewed the draft environ- mental impact report (D.E.I.'R.) for the foothill Blvd, Specific Plan. Comments on the D.E.I.R. are as follows: 1. Section IV-D fails,,to address the constraints imposed on development of property at the nokheast corner of Foothill Blvd, and Grove Avenue as a result of the realignment of Red Hill Drive. 2. Section IV-D-19 fails to address the noise impacts 4n adjacent residential areas created by introduci,-g a new street intersection into Upland at Red Hill Drive and Grove Avonue. A detailed noise study with mitigation mea- sures should be Provided in the D.E.I,R. specifically addressing this issue. 3. Section IV-D-22 fails to provide specific noise mitigation measures for the rerouting of Red Hill Drive to Grove Avenue, 4. Section IV-F-I requires a more det-171ed traffic analysis of the two alterna- tives considered for alignment of' Red Hill Drive. Both alternatives will impact adjoining properties. The analysis should include: A. Addressing a third scenario which will be "no Ooject." B. Discussion of the existing and future (projectzd) traffic volumes on Red Hill Drive. C. Discussion of the need for traffic signals in each scenario.' °0. Discussion of the capacity at each intersection in eacl:�scenario. n r ✓ b � a � gyp, �, �� r, MV4. Ott i4►+o � �� Page 2 E. Addres,*.ttg the harxtzotal and vertical alagrnt of Gro eke,,. naria fir, tn !` �enu� to Sc` possible adverse vertical "reedg c�n #d9 t 'fimitQd ��t ice: F. Disc4ssioe witetief the street wi11 be rgc7as3fi'ed'?, ? ,\ S. The „d ctr:I.R. fails to pt:ngase ,or eira ate other"possibRte- mea�t5,.for rerouting ar real ie�rt of Red Rfi l► Dris It `Secti�oF� F x,. � We would als8 like to take th ,s opportunity toy rji erate'a r triau ,@ what there is �+-T scant �C.oncem nth the adverse noinset and'Cnr�if � itcs of introducing a new i4h'Oi:or strew ifnta "an established tiplaiid ne g ba ood; Although some existing i t on oa hil ="81v +tauld b alle iat �e in far more severe impacts:wn wee created dn'tnro e Avenue and its a ty5 7hle City of ttplapd .r{aeld theresi~ar 1'�k'e ".tO indicate its disaaRroval of e, ealign- ment of Rid Hill hlrtve is Orous At�enp . *k Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please oantact me at (T24) 982-1352, ext. 252. Sincer ly, Z^j �i pl1 J�Atwater, Associate Planner c and Planning Department Jh " 77 U, � � 91 aQ L►/P6 p�ifVE.EL MON t ,C 131781 (0 8)572-62 R-EGEiVEa;=a CaY of RANCI CUCAit1PNo KMNINQ Dlvlslf�N JUN z5 1987 '��8}9�lOr1�12�1�2�3�4�5�6 �\ aune 23, 1987, Mr. Otto Kroutal Community Development Department City of Rancho Cucamonga <> e 93it3 Baseline Road Tancho cuca7nonga,, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Kroutil.° Draft. Environmental Impact Report Foothill Blvd. Specific Plan, Rancho Cucamonga., CA sc�oMIx i! `A7D5IF�,� 1 z The Planning Division has reviewed the above environmental document and we offer the following cownentn A transportation management association (:tm) should be established. The asssci.atiOn should iricihde representatives from ar&a businesses who are interested `in discussing traffic problems and concerns common to all. F°cw example, businesses could jointly develop programs including ridesharing, carpooling, park-and ride lots, and traffic light synchronization. If you have any further questions ple`lse contact Gay Muttersbach, of this division, at (sis) 572-6,405. Very, truly yours, John R. Grisinger Acting Director Planning Divis'�Qn x ,Slots of fatWWMits sw 1%,T,antpWaften and Housing Agency F> Memorandum To : State Clearinghouse- Dale Ld"ne 22, 1987 Office of Planning k ReseC_ .h 1400 10th.Street Pile No.,08-SBd--66-4.1 Sacramento, CA .95814 SCHU7021615 Attention Peggy Osborn --CcECEtVED--- r. crrY of RANcHo cusp AONGA €� from DEPARTMENT OF ERA*PMATION PLANNING DIVISION District 8 JUN 3 0. Y., subject. DEIR - Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan AM ` PU 7A9t10Rh141e2j3141516 we have reviewed the above-referenced document and request consideration of the following: 1. During construction within State right of way, any lane closure and/or traffie control should be in compliance with State standards including advance warning signs and lane tapers.. 2. Provide at least minimum sight distance for all vehicles entering and exiting at all access locations, 3. Provide sufficient vehicle storage in new left-turn pockets. 4. All new traffic signal installations, including modifications of existing signals, shell. be financed by the developer. o The report doe's not address the prim-ary purpose of the State highway which 'ss to allow `the motorist to traverse the 1. facility with the least Inconvenieince an in a safe man o Traffic will be coneentratpr :at the ir; rsections sho n the conceptual plans so that ai ~ 3river -.sr, 'desires entr 7."-- place on the opposite 3tde of the street, relativetidirection of t.,avel, is forced to proceed to the nex n section and make, a "U"-turn {n order to get to hisdestination. . Es o Other c.ancei^ns are with planted medians which show trees lawn, etc. The trees shown will constitute a fixed object` within 30' of the edge of traveled way and will, during younger stages of growth, obstruct the vision of the driver. Maintenance and watering will also add to problems for the driver. Workers in the median will be a distracting influence and watering could cause a wet pavement conditions during dry weather whit;. is not anticipated by the ordinary driver. This could cause 1033 of control of the vehicle. R ,;*_ tlr rpk 1 Sfi$te Clearinghoa Attention FPage 2 egg�x, �. dune 22, 19 o "Enhanced" itltcrsaetion Y Fshow ng paving blodics of unknown description un a Sao pattern,, within a square, h�4je molt ,._ been accepted b► tric e for'use as.,a su'bstitut.6 fc our .. present paving ma. ria-0 Bbilards constitutes fixed ,abjects and would be d1sA-x ed;, o Caltrans suppor�s ;'he r'�'rlign ent of Red Hill A one to Grove f Avenue and thre 3na n of the existing co��ntection;of San Diego Av "" e"�:o Frothill"�l�oulevard, ass, st� sd under Project Alternativesi. It is unclear as B6�Ae .irntomt .of the alternatives for Rstacia' Courte is an west street "as is B,a^n Bernardino Road and Foothill' Borizsard. �¢ We would appreciate the opportunity to review and, comment on the;11 proposed DEIR in order .to evaluate^possi'ble impacts to the s transportation system, particularly State Route 66. - We urge early and continuous liaison with Caltrans on proposed ' plans as they affect State highways. If you have an questions, y q , please contact'M-aria;,)'; ' (714) 383-4541 GUY G. VISBAL Chief, Transportation Planning Branch A MP-lb cc; FDHusum, Plan Coordinatior. Unit, DOTP File (2) .ti IF i ,I�f 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT i` ".. Y DATE: July 8, 1987 } 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FRO14: Brad Bul 1 er, City Pl an►ier BY: Alan Warred, Associate Planner SUBJECT: FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN I " BACKGROUND: At the June 24, 1987 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed—recommendations to modify the draft Specific Plan and gave staff final direction on the plan provisions. Since that time, a,n amended plan has been produced and distributed to the Comission. This plan should be in a form ready for final Planning Commission ' consideration. As was mentioned at the last meeting, one of 'she significant changes to the plan is the addition of an execut summary at the ueginning of the document. This feature provides a brief but detailed general descr:r ion of the plan's scope, its goals and objectives, and structure. The summary will give the reader a ,:mature<;of the community's desires in the development of the corridor and help the public understand the plan's objectives. The summary will also be available separately to help educate the commanity about the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. On June 29, 1987, at a meeting with Chamber of Commerce representatives„ the Chamber requested an opportunity to review the final draft prior to final Commission arttion on the document. Staff was requested to present a summary of the plan at a regularfy scheduled meeting of the Economic Development Committee of the Chamber of Corwrce on July 15, 1987. Since the revised draft has j, only been available for public review for a fow days, it may be appropriate to extend the review period till Jul;+ 22, 1987. As a result, staff is not prepared to recommend approval until after final Chamber comments are presented for consideration. Lewis Homes has forwarded concerns regarding the Planning Commission recommendation to incorporate design elements o'• the plan into properties along Foothi A Boulevard between Haven Avenue and the I-15 freeway. The Commission recommen6ation to include !i this area has not yet been formally presented to the City Council for consideration. Staff intends to bring the issue to the Council along wit;i the Planning Commission specific plan approval recommendation. i ITEM Q IL 1:0 I4L •8 ' 1 " y� y 0 �= iZT. R8G1 W Zt, i rsercamended, thast P94ann =ng Conrata�s `aaa L� provMr ,, Ft}t an;. a ae�utss f d3tng the �F n, contfinue the to b Iuty 198 meet kg fbr aansirdert im °of _ 1 p 6 t€he pob4 ar the Chamber a erce cup a`Submitted 9 ad Bu er City F' BB id;to _ Attachacnt: Frnai �bralft 5peolftc Fjan - al 3 F p r 1 CITY 01�'AANCHO CUCA.UONGA STAFF REPORT 'f. 1977' MATE.,; duly 8, 1907 Te* Chairman and�Members of the Plannirg Commission t ;I FROM: Brad Butter, City Planner BY; Alan barren, Associate Planner <, SUBJECT: ERVIR04WNTAL ASSESSMENT.AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDME14T 87-03B r - CITY OF k _ A MgWSt to aMenG ZM LanQ e Wp of General P I an as follows. n 1. commercial to Office for 8.45 acres on the northeast corner of Grave Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APR 207-011-43 44. 2. office to tomeercial for: a. Approximately 3 acres on the northeast cz.4r,Yer of Red Hill Country Club Drive and San Bernardiffo Road APR 207-113.01, 10 b. Approximateli 3.5 acres on the southwest corner of Carnelian Avenue and San Bernardinq Road - APH i07w 102-03 p.5-_,08, 04, 1Z & 19; Approximately a acres on the northeast corner of Interstate 15 and Foothill Boulevard - Aft 227-211- 24, 25 & 27; and d. Approximately 5 acres on the southeast corner of- Etiwanda` Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - AP4 229 311-1.4 & 15. 3. Medium Residential to Cormercial for; a. Approximately 11 acres on the southwest corner of Tur€per Avenue and Foatlhilt Boulevard - poWwns of APR 208-321-23 & 24. b. Approximately 7.5 acres, 115 feet north of Foothill Boulevard on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue -- APR 227-201-08 & 22, and portions cf APR 227-201-07 and {{ ITEM R P!ANI}E1NH C StH�S�WF REPORT :GPAf Af 07 1SPA$7-01 JOY n- c. Approximately 5,15 acres, 500 feet north of Fool Boulevard on the wes,',)side of East Aven poftlons of Apm 227-23-23. LOW 'Residenial to Co�perc4. ial for ,en COxititd`�"j acres, 3C10 feet north oP PoothiY Boa f��`�d on the, side 91 Turner Avenue - AoN 1077-ou -08 & 1g�, v portions of ApX I077-801.02 6 D4; 5. Industrial Park to Commercial for approximatel acres on the southwr',t corr& of Etiwanda;Avenue FoothiTl Boulevard G. To adjust the line` between Medium �Residentia:l, Commercia"n the block bordered by Foothill Boule San Bernardino Road, HelIman. Avenue and Klusman,N:: (see exhibit). Division line _ as shown," approximate. Precise vocation of Titnd use division _ be d'etezalned through the Foothill Boulevard Spec Plan.,. 1i({, ENVIRONAENTAL 'ASSESSMENT AND E1ILtAPiDA SPECIFIS EB f"' - - � Ga _„ n amen remove rate tse wa a pec c man approximate'1 acre of la04 on the north side of Fe thin Boulez between the'3-'23 Freeway and East Avenue; approximate ` - acres of;-land a.( the southeae�'corner of Etivanda Av and Foothill Boulevard; and approximately 14 acres of an the southtkit corner of East ;Avenue and Foot Boulevard - APN`,177-211-24, 25 & 27, APN 227-221-01 07-09, 14 & 22-27' APN 227-231-19, 21, 28, 29, 33 & APN 229=311-14 & 15, APN 229-041-10, and portions of 217-23I=15 A 23. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND <Tt+u.edSTRIAL SPECIFIC �o nq remove rags e n us r a K rea -Specifi An 7 _ approximately 80 acres of land on the south side Foothill Boulevard between the I-15 Freeway and EtiW Avenue - APND 229-031-01, 16 & 20 and portions of 229-� 57 A 59. i OR" 4.7 i) PLANNING COWISSMN tTAFi; REP 4Rl CPA V-436, E5PA 87.02, XSAA 87-01 duly 8, 1987 zti page « ;T. BIl�KGRt?UND: The three items J)isted for planning Commission cons' era on are actions which aze neCessitgited by the anticipated �')actment Of the Foothill Bo+Jlevard Spetific Plan (see Exhibits). ;: The General Plan Amendment.-will�han land; use designations for those properties along Fo.,?hill'a�::l�tard prc^vsed. for change by ' } graft Specific plan. The General Plan must be amended before he Specific Man becomes effective. CL Those parts of Foothill Boulevard east of the I-15 Freeway are currently, regulated by two existing sets .of regulations, the ! ' Eti.wanda Sfecffic Plan and the industrial Area Specific Phan. The proposed a endients will; remove 'she land from the existing plans to , avoid Overlapping ,regulations as a result Hof adoption of toe Foothill Specific plan. 4•" II,` DISCUSSIM, Analysis of the General Plan A►�endisent is tied cirecr y the ,and use categories reviewed during the Foothill ` Boulevard Specific Plan hearings. Mach of that analysis has been. : completed and the remaining land.use issues aro to be addressedIn ' the Enyirone'ental I1pact Report review. Environmental analy is of the General. Flan Amendments is`4eing formulated by the Project Consultants end action on-, the Awandments cast wait untl`1 the analysis is ready for Plaa;ning Commission review" . Thz Etiwanda and Industrial Area Specific PIa ,Jesendments are less involved and action on them needs only to wait , adoption of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. ;,ntii that,yi�e`-�Ie affected I Properties must remain under the regulatory provisions of the exist�4 specific plans: III. RECO MENDED ACTIONS~ It is recommended that these three items be con 'fitum gus 12, 1987 at which time the General Plan and rom a Analysis will be ready for the Alanr.ing Commission rev e�, ver, the Commission should conduct k public hearing'to all w for bTic input on these issues. espect Iy Jbmi d Brad Bal er City Pl nner BB.A .sgr Attachments wo rR a VQHVld U3 wj w� . Cob ' 0 , � a r F t •3AV N3AVH uu -1 1: l \� dIL._ 3,3AV QHVA3MlA a ��1' i� w W '3AV a3)IVO A c: •3"brave -I q may./. ••'t�-� Rfk i�0♦ t , i^'� i[� • is .Msti°` r ,t • j•�t• rrt . � - r r r; r. • r �p11•�. h J .. � � a • 1 • H, a• • _ y r >d► r k S a 97 DATE: JOY 8* TO.• ChaPtrman -and,siefnberg,o son Brant.Buffer; M,41*1ner J BY Nanc .t mctV:l sacd%te.PlAnner� SUBJECT, t:N1t�8 i �• �Ctt g ri iC�y p p a7 "'"""- i"+ y ��'� L•'t; a Ren.au, m E Pe 71p'?QE USE � el � ac a l�dma � aft Oi; e .AM In i 4 Rack Di i tSt arm 1,z deo -4 ;bn the norkh side n Civic cdi t e" 01ti've- te teak -street`az�d Reds C�ak /,� r.' Streett?h: f - #di..�5� t�dF ,3 , r�Rer is the request• aq�end t[7 Ranchoycamanga;:8�ssne$s Park Masts RanS ' sitesigP ,ti:hg tie tubjett. . -site fftjj Corporate PTvazap to MedirMaj g Fi4ce a"t l ►i=nt t ati°vet`" Pro essfigii 7. Gfffce,, and the,deTetie of ttte°°puv street connectiion through ttit stte, reap. �j Related tiles; CUP 87�-17 att4 PM 10695.. + r Ibis item will be considered a1; the same! time with Conditional Use Permit 87 17 and Parcrx Maly 10694L Please:refer to Oe report of Item G. BB>IIFt vc r ,i _rt r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPOR! As 0 DATE: July 8, 1987 6' TO: Chairman and Members of the PlantOng Commission ^ ` FROM: Brad Bulter, City Planner" �z BY: Nancy Fong, Associate Planner SUBJECT: €NV RONHENTAL ASSESWNT AND DEYELORMENT REVIEW 87-17 aeveiopmenr ot a z,tuU square foot;' 'Say service station on 0.69 acres of land wWvin an approved h., shopping center in the Neighborhood Commercial District, located at the northeast corner of Haven and Highland Avenues - APN 20f-7271-68. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of the detailed' site plan and elevations B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning= ortn Shopping Center, SiTn`gTe Family domes; Neighborhood Commercial District, Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Vacant, Single Family Homes, Future Foothill Freeway, Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East. New Apartments Under Construction,,Medium-High Residential District (14-24 dwelli}g units per acre) - West - Vacant, Single Family Homes, Gas :Nation, Neighborhood Commercial District, Office/Professioral District, Low Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) C. General Plan Designations: rojec to - eign5orrh"ood Commercial District North - Neighborhood Commercial District, Low Density Residential ` South - Loa, Density Residential East Medium-High Density Residential Kest - Neighborhood Commerclal, Ofiice/Professional, Medium Density Residential ` ITEM t J. PiiAIIN G 14OFi=REPORT \ aftQt+l >R w1 S7, - UNOCltL - ;> 0•. ,rite Characteritst�.es, The site is vaca&d' and rough, graded.. sw agf vegeta totu cinsists al turf to prov1de.,erosion and s t*4rol and toy improve this'appearance:of thi-site. Street lan��uvents al oh�� iia�rerr Prenuee c61 eted with parkway �apivg. � E. Parkit,1CaiculaVons `1$uOer of Number of `Type Sguare Parking Spaces Spaces . Of Re Poota a Ratio : Re. -fired Provided 4 say Service Station 2,700 3 for service 3 3 station; 2 per bay 8 13 R. ANALYSIS: - A. Generals The project site is part of the-.,approved Haven 1 _TTTagg"Shopping Center, as shown in Exhibit-"Au. This pad area ±lp approved for a service station and the applicant is proposing to construct a Unocal Station.. The proposed design of the site plan and the architectural style are consistent with the approved shopping center.. B. Design Review Committees The Committee (McNiel, Chitiea, eman) rev ewes UP, proposed project initially on May 21, 1987, and raised a concern, that the proposed elevations lack the detailing. of the existing shopping center. _It was _ recommended that the elevations be revised as follows. 1. The west elevation along Hifen Avenue should be improved by adding a tower treatment with windows and by extending the river rock treatment upwards to the raised middle portion of the building. 2. Multi-pane windows consistent with those shown on t overhead doors should be provided in the office area. 3. iouble wood beams on all sides of'the building should t added. 4. ia1 'sed heavy wood rafter tails should be added to tFe� soffit area on all sides of the building 11167uding the canopy over the gas pump island. t pw: PL'ANNIN lCOAM;SST%4lC S�[ F REPORT DEVELOPME, - REYT W 87 7 UtfQ AL July 8, 7 p Page 53 'd. All >> �„ window areas Should have heavy wood trim /•. consistent witVthe entire shopping; -enter. 6. River rack veneer should be of the Lake Tahoe blend from Stucco Stone Products consistent with the shopping center. 7� The river rock veneer column of the gas pump,island should be enlarged in size and heavy duty double wood o _ beam work should.4e used. 8. The trash encicsur.� area backing up to Haven Avenue should be improved by providing an overhead wood trellis`oonsistent with those existing in the center for aesthetic,purposes. 9. Sheet cap across the top of the .roof "elements should be deleted as it is inconsistent with the shopping center. 10. All colors and materials used such as wood siding and . trim should match the existing.,center. The applicant revised the elevations and resubmitted for Committee review at th_ June 1S, 1987 regular meeting. The Committee reviewed the revised elevations and recommended approval with the conditicn that the windows in the office area should be of mul.i-Pane design consistent with the building. C. Environmental Assessment: Staff has completed .;the Environmentalec s and has deteriained th3t no slgniffr nt adverse impact 'would result from the drreloparent of this- proiect. Further, a Negative Declaration has been issued for the Master Plan on April 24, 1985. III. FACTS FOR FILINGS: The proposed r.oject is consistent with the objectIve neral ,Plan. The proposed use, building design, site plan, and together with the recommended conditions of approval, are in ccmpliarce with ea0i of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto., will not be detrimental to- the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to Fr:perties or improvements in the vicinity.. "`r�► �� COt �`LPORli PagJAW e r II IV. $EfiOt END rT t3F1 ''Staff ..recommer.�is that the fl�anni�ng. CoMmisw bn approve• eV�•� gent Review+877-17. All RespeCtfull sub►af ted Brad Buller City Planner BB:NF:te Attachments: Exhibit `;t* Site Util'izatidj flop Exhibit " '� pppraved t+�sterl an r Exhii t " "t - t3a 1 ed Site Pl��_ Exhi bit `D" - Cdoiceptual Gracft;(;-Plan Exhibit !"V_ - Cgnceptual Landscape Man Exhibit "P" - El vatto:s. ' R"olution of Appr.bval with Conditlilrohs . 1 4 I f s ^ � �pq? �Y�7► .,yy�4f � �.:A�''d�YS"..>'.waa�n>1�a k � }j �aM � x r r .a r. i��, hff-1:.. »_�=ae .��p".tea ,w a� � ��a'• � w� r 1: �k ai. t t a wi?a Y .___�.. •J T 4e4ep w, <•- �,.�4 fir... �y -t u''' w �+ � _ 'fit __. .-._-_.1�1-.�'_.. ,�`✓ �r+ ,RANCID, XCAMONGAAE �� it � • :...•Y� >ta - ��.. ZZ n n f +va �. � • �'1 s _ � � + e • Ywr.�1 � aJle{T+YIli ��.�.'� ��.Y. h1. •+wtW YIY. n. AL A psi STATM M04 &&?304 MY 1, rrmt RANUJD '' MMI +4ii `I.t11,tNN3 iJl Y i7>QN ►�tii4 '.ft�"��„-._ : .. >' ♦� � M Y� �tf, '{1� ar � �.4yfr`@`�®. Br�fi � 9$ i; �A '" k � � . -. � �� t �r ::ab�`l! M Aoe"�� X d �f i � �,t T� t�f� � .n,'�, '� Y 41,fQi r i�� • ti� :' f ,�P�� 4 �� i�,�.r �� <� v '�W• C Q ." ^" r-^ -. �� .` n 7 /// �..00d f tir i.,i R� l$ v'• � 11 i, i � i jam, �, � ��,•; � ,' 1 � II•I i�_�. :•J:i��i 't h ��• 111 :rJo i'• t�v:C1^ �. jt{ r C . ACV „ �'�--•-tom""�..---�""�. /r.V) y L' dye s1�U x y y h h .� ,FiaC3�1V'F!€�EAIR �LEO/�TIOI'�t 77 P RANCHO '*'M"I0NGA luo sr PLANN cr, 16 ` "� �. i. Wl fulata i { -4 a EM�W _ _ 'j G A }% 1 } RESOLUTION NO. } RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMON(5A PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVTfil` ' �)EVELOPMCNT REVIEW NO. 87-17, FOR THE DEVELO OF A 2,700 SQUARE-FOOT SERVICE 'STATION ON 0.69 A OF _,LAND LOCATED AT THE NOkTHEA CORNER OF HAVEN AND HIGHLAND AVENUES IN TH�'NEIGH80RHO �COMMERCIAL ' DISTRICT - APN: 201-271-68> WHE61 S, on the 29th day of May, 1987, a-Iomplete application was filed by Unocal for reviett,of the above-described pro t; and WHEREAS, on the 8th day, of duly, 1987, the R�ncto Cucamonga Planning Commission field a meeting to consider the above-des&& ed project. follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Zommission resolved a:� SECTION I ,' That ,the following can be met: 1. That the propsed project is consistent with the objectives of tto-.General Plan; and Amh 2. That the proposed use is 'in accord :with the ob ective of the Development Code and thf; purposes of the district in width the site is located; and 3 That t;,`e proposed use fs in �compliance.,with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable"thereto, will not be detrimental to the injurio sublic �to properties c;r Improvementss i or n-them ` vicinity. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on thel environmer an at a Negative Declarat;on for the Master Plan (CUP 84-31) nas been issued p` April 24, 1985. SECTION 3 'That Development Review No. 87-17 is approved subject to the follow rag con ti0ns and attached Standard Conditions: Planning Division; 1. All pertinent conditions of approval contained' in Planning Commission Resolution 85-57 shall apply. 2. All exterior materials, colors, sizes ar: textures shall match the approved materials and colors for the Haven Village 5hopping Center.. A building material sample board shall be submitted fcr review { and approval' prIOM-to issuance of building pa ts. " �� PLANtaING C,OMMISSI s BESOC UT"ON NO. F DEYEt.OPP1ENTr REAL 1� -tINOCAI July 8, 198 Page 2 3. The site shall be developed and maintained jai 1 accordance with an ��ppr�sved site `plan, . which` includes architeetul��l elevations, exteriorwterials and colors, . ndscaping and grading an 'File with, the Ptanning Division, the conditions' contained '_ther6n, and the 9velopment Code j regulations. 4. Th ttindow, area around the office portion -of the building s!ali be of multi-pane design. I 5. Decorative llrftt` fixtures consistent with the 0op;�Ing center shall be provided along the north side o-. f site area. 6. Sighs shall be-tesigned to ccnform' with the approved ,. i Uniform Sigo Program for the shopping center. Engineering Division; 1. The misting ovevhead utilfties (tel ecummunications . on tE.1 project side of FAven Avenue" inciading the SC-ice line;orl the west side of Haviin Avenue shall be •'-+nrgrounded along the entire ;roiect frontage '' pxrrding tc1( the first pile off site (north, and south} rior�-to public i5i p. l c .� rovea�ent exceptions :-� ' acct;pancy, w`+i6taver occurx pfirst. Reimbuseatent of i�ne-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development 3s it occurs on the opposite side of the ,tree,, is feasible because the property is tsndeveei2: . 2. Notice of intention to form and/or join the 'Lighting , and Landscaping District shall be filed with 'thn City Council prior to issuance of building permits. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JULY, 1987. PLANNING COHNISSIOH OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA i BY: arrY'_T e., a rman ATTEST: l 1 Brad u er,. epu y Wc—re iary fV Page 3 MW I"Brad Brad Bulb^ .Or-'ut; Secr� ,, of,.th �kanning Co i�,, o f the Gt y adf. ' Panct►ouLvan. a f�;�`ebr +rt •,ttat fie foregoing Rti .r �iy and regul arly idss o ',�Yce�i� ¢i s eur'a's�s a4ptnd .y..fi lt� nRinw: Cowestlod of O . City of Rancha'tuc' gar,=at a r gu►ar e iI df the"'Plantving Cou#fss�ian heM on the 8th day of-Itev, Im". by' The fQomV,.YOte�tC;Salt: , UES COMClLaSIF R.S: � — NofsG f:E IO#iMRS.; ABSENT: cowlstiomms: `4 s K ,F t v i - 1 .s +.A+ ■E C 1J�y> CMy < .�qQ U .� 4pp3 aµiw�. ,q, y6�Q'f.. ww V�.p VRe N.S r4. t 'yl'L Y Rb C.��CCR�. }'� /.. 69'y■. fr��g4GqA �'CN O6 Rum. �u� 1� t,!)"'y9... ,,« «y0 '.. 4 ,LL Yv'a qyY ..R�4—. uRu&s—"ego sa«20v E n«a i a c aQ<� 01 f1GLRbR CM NR � �O ai�R" u*s r.4'V y40. y��"�` u.t _VV y c a p C .Y� MO CLR^tl CN .~ 14 N Y iSN N N•cR bss H t— rzx— .ss CC as CMC ^' ii {tom rsq S .K 6�yL{ .�'y IL CC ORa40 'FT'M�u NN� fill II�� +ICu yea C.v a _� •s. $w.. A g � 4.N.+ M _ Lpp4rnp_ N'GaM�s Mpt.+'l rA 451- C4 K�itwNw �.f SOy Fd4A � 1 AAk Y N 7 II��ww Q pp i M =u�4fi�n {Wy u pCC 44 { hi Ogi 1 u�ay , yv yy � .0 � � 3TC� ' � �~ ��Rn•Yf YywC y NYC yg�'2p� Rb�� C aicY p Q o..04 6•Fi.y4yyC` r R CITY M Q -8 N� O �Mwg LyI yrs YYMu 3 Ou3> t�' � 'N'N' v� IS IS qWRy«O a�yq YY N►{y� �� L QI« gip �N4 �' uT= py .O C�ttld sNpp.«.i if 99 It T. y«aT y�:�L M '4�C 41 N i«I ` a ►q0 } 1 �MO Zr lTr C.Ci r..� C�' L ,A Gd� L��ANuy nL6 L NYLR. µM. . ^Y 0 V spy �9 ''A 2Cy ��Vz-b:L tat CyLU I— �M� bps ; -Z Y L N y EJ _ 'gu? y�iuu'r'" s 3 5.'.' N= G o .,, $ $t GL� E. „ $� ra.Yi^' 1o:Cc..., 'a ipA�o u-g.. l ag9O `!S¢C Vic. gypq Ya. M _.eZ ,I ^m«►'li+t S-7t, maNy "'roc. «K�.Yi•� I=� dr b.� Ou. A• CYNp.Y3�' ►Y. ;y. y� On�W ►t f"' y Y1` O �� Y�cs►jai CDY. „ Ctip yC tlNn « � �y a� _. 'cb 7S �,.+.": �pp u>� AL RCt,C 6Y 6� +LY Ptlyt 1`tl Y.-► M ptlusLA. 6CN fi~bb=iy aC ~ y�. y j .rCJ6� ' _ AErg�Lgy'1-a! �6 F atl' V +C'r ► CCVCwti YYY Y� uE I 1, - 04 t u'C a uy.d vi L�. `$�x Zl icy L i+'.Y v t.aR • tr yyc� LL . y, C O qNq $IL NL tlo 'l b' NOyV.V u4 nA 6� 4« tyV Ya OC �qy ~qL iu 'C «M « .N�tG NC.;aa xAL yy eL __ er NSa ►.t� 4TgHµ C�u G R► -^ �K. tT .Ni FL C �- ry GQp C,G ppN q!8 pp«Yat Li u > 61 - TYVEyyN C `¢�i <Ca VC��Y�Z.9 Y= E2R -9 +V.=€-21 -, . _sit! M I r Z I X. � 1 lS�►C Ea 3a� •Oa ��b6p�t�F M�M C 4�36�..yt aC tl Ca oa►� L at y«t C a ZZT�ILL',Z M stla- CML ti uwC„. aao', ip$.lYy; ti "�y.0�' �'a �,gn� ta,a•^L V 1.8 Ly Zp y e„giC�l-.ems ofSW�!^$ 6, w.. 6 yGyao N6 N.0 w�O <•�w4 r+ .+.y j R h t C.Cgdv'34a yCC44p <A 6L6 � L► �Yd h � <Y pR443�91.-� its 22 n Y't'p'c 4 gS +o+ Y� utlb wN${r�' s_&It u ��ab 0 V�S» .` • C ±J p y.. �w.]p. +.CSC.i L Y t G yni E s =J.� 4s e N rJ, O b i N Vl. wo 9 b 0 49 -gay. �_ Y MI. t►P$A Yt w.. >r a r� C'Y tlit H ~ 9�Q Y ar/ pN ff 46�V a nip ..ya ��] �4 O Ot v..s p 4i .RE Py .�rN UYVi. tiYry G i 'A ft'r' 4b 1�yN =Y N nn Yard a gCC ay ��p- CC �»,+ _ vi .� �qT �.Nl{{l LG atb i�' .'.919 +M oa ls$$a n� (¢1 Cp 4O5 {MS�G j� ypp�! yy H I U. bj� �N `O N a N }I7I tki yy �pJ1.CCb 1:9.b C.i�6N �sv t X1! oM i c.. 40.` �y rigwaLL� s� 6a�wn � i..L�YLr oN6y U"w•o�a 5 �CCcy—�' G"u'°`'o'.' bN`CCpb $µ.Et. RY -ni �!!1LiG MOCLN QI4CC$EEItS ..gyp w w.Q `4C42L N�MM t;Rt c xN. 1�NC Sl4Y.�r..Gh?OaN6g G9rG l'r <1 Y.04OM C tl.t t��+n ■Yt N „ tLx NGnty. V� 6�Ei �b��J�tL p4 yE Y ca y�j .OM V > Gtit>p .Yy � / ■� Di r p� 4 p � Y Y N+IIµ DWG V^` : µ +•GiV 6 µs C EI.MV Ct C. Lr �Y >✓�. i C tr''C JaC.. Q �.� e.'b µ r V 4}V`n �i, y�v A v R.Y`C A L µ g«. Jb . 4Y %$UrC dlY�TO E V y V x't Yn YbY�t +tl. �b • G� ; L® �^ ` M� q0 Oa9 Nn¢��F�Q'j 1 Lr L pcC4LC i. i pV qCi Cpupa YC>' q bT L. pOq 4J .ttls. i Lppp •pip µQ4r�k N.1[`„ m� C N O A wt p' +gb^aC D �b LM L i ON 4gMi C.b�5-P U.�'� vG .c y• o .�, .�� tl.L Y T> ,$��9�a r+R�4ang �aM=pn a I it �. G W ,cYa� syE �� .. oc•—�ci e• �cq •E iu �_. a �4 •�`� g Y♦kL L 9 y.� Y tUa C� .J Lppf•n L y°eG ai ��=••�6 V p> y�.• � Sopy. NH'S :- � � �.;... �Il� "" G • i y w 1� 6 O K N aU. sas ora Yoa.'f,"-1 y. 1a$t s � w� 3.4p., '6g,'4Y'v2 �, NFL y. np� 'OYUS�■p Py� �j[ Y weG Mom« Sy�C O?• . S�Qq �1YAV� �a.8 ��:w t 0CC' «�.F �o•�U.� OO,-L � Ru�y g��L Y' V.$ Y� � �4 CwC+O. y Y.� C�C�{T. yCC O Y X ,._ �u�'.Y ��y•.� �y•�Vy�yCL y �b u^O s�Y Shia VO pl aL W a 'a4 w.UY O•eQM+ � € Ya q d1 tl Y i yCC Q w N q W L� i. tl W '"{. c� {{11 U OYJi Y Cy Q�: i� ,9 VVLA� +i G ` L�� 64C W �" wl QwN1-3 b4U y+CTCOY Uri CO •n w.V yyppU Y O• ��•• T �� O r-u�� V L �� A k:5 9Er. m S w w EO�'q O n .�_r- �O�i� y O' •1� w H Y q tat H d v C C _ !a i {. yq • yP� O.0 Y` rY� MY3 LLB C IIi YN ps •a3 L wtO C '� �" as mac_ • a trti �g'> d0 Y A� n-� 4 C} Y Y pp L.syy� �„ .. g{Yz� Y. w 9 N `�• iwj C jt aaT+.c gs59Yd a'�'i4. rnQ 1a.ce g^ � Y�� !. Ems•—a,s >� a'n �� '� �a�a Q w e NN +RC M�y in V.... au �6 O•-L. V 4 YY1 CCy 1 a QN tvp. ....�w,M � Lp'.Ue OT ^ w` w. VL ��!Y YV .p w- lit c �.�b.'�$e mi $jpg ,•��' La.�+. tEy.~'c.•YM VE I gi 66.._. C C L L"N ' aEE i yy �, Z �m$ `i- ,"r C cUi M� Y W W W@ 3 �i1 M y �1 1 r 77) I it CCSYS 1Yi�' •ems .nf�'�.�i s., � V as E g� Ygt ` N Y n `.S p q M $. w'S y Ya o 6[� ji:A4 Y F ,'{M C tS'yC�. �`��$ 4 �1wR.r 40^N �� Y. �clA��n ',G�` M Y Y i OHO M ' {•,[[gy�CjC �V! ■■ aspa \.�$S;Y Y L -t gat, I [� 6 L �Y Lr ob $ NYz $'� sAb y '�G'�SsSMY .; S _ » •+ c ■■MF Co m` eC C p = !YV N 9 a -V 't, p s[� yYa�3B CO»4 [�. YYgi�. yY.. YrYYVT ['Tj■ya µC« IN pply l Y«cam ax Qg.. tom. a-a fir '11 A. � e 3 V IS &°ice "• Zee g Gov p M� > UZ: 5 a$ xL.yL CC L~��wY. .O�� 6Nw/..�0 _ ^� - 1 Ct Y 6�._'lY Ytl•� 6` 3� 1p 4apL�W �L Sq^ YYIL» 941 y�Y'!!�yW 6`.yi�tl`G i �CyF "` U Yp6 t, •4G 9� ItO...J(2�pC��. VlO44� 7 6�.M 4%T Ste, Yt+�w LLW 34 yV '��. V M ilrr_I.7YW � • A a � i t € g 73 a { L pp pp SG C ►� Y. F� L LLY4 r4 irO.� y 1i0 �i Yuu 4t Ni �Vr 4IiLet'• C ' a�r� �J[4Fu•�� R9_1 aia T T VV ram= Cp� i� 4`g y'a�r ZI IE <vg a's E 3erY +t 3 f(FF u' rY �c�tlo giG P N Cvpg M 3! b s b IS a v}« alit In Uj Lkt �YL 1 ~ j ]La qs s � 1SA w4� 1Z�Lr. Ou aYt.i -ail I,*:. Zt 4 0 13 .L,Y L3i ypL Y r yy +��yg` y l � ■t ��4' �Pt4 A y�� 4 "M�`+* �r.��.. •two•= cb s`n: Y � � � � l�r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT a _z tsn DATE., July 8, 1987 TO: Chairman and Members of`the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Be-Jer, City. Planner G . BY: Chris Westman, Assistant Planner ' SUBJECT: ENVIROf MW(AL, ASSESSMENT AND DEVEl.U.PM€ `REVIEW 87i4o, LENNON propin a con in -u s rut - " enan an . olK sa warehouse building totaling 66,814 square feet €n the General Industrial District,_Subarea 5, on 1,8 acres of land located at the.northerat corner of Turner Avenue Ad 6th Street APR: 909-26i<'48, 19, 2Z. Ia PROJECT MD SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of site plan, ;elevatians ano 'issuance o a negative declare � a. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zon ngs North - vacan , u area . ,, 7-7neraT Industrial ' ! South Vacant, Subarea 5, 4verax Industrial East Vacant, Subarea 5Yfsaied Industrial West - Yar nt, Subarea 5, 0,=r*rrA Industrial C. General Plan Desi nations: Project 5WATTZ strial,/Rail Served North Gewral Industri'a-I/Rail Served South General Industrial/Rail Served East General Industrial/Rail Served Vest - General Industrial/Rail Served D. Site Characteristics: The site is currently vacant with no significant vege a on. There is street frontage on three sides of the project including 6th Street which is a Special Boulevard. Street improvements have been , completed- on the northern most street (Sharon Circle) and along 6th Street. However, they have not been completed along Turner Avenue due to an existing open drainage channel. STEM;0 k� 1pC f�larining Cbasaisrson Siff Report DR 87 . _20 - dtnp i1 ARCRiEGTS dul,,�8 qB :page 2 E. Parking:Galculatioae; rf NL!!ft_r 61, 'Number of Tye Square Parking ;,Spaces 'I$par?s of llse Fautae Ratio Required died Off1ce 1/250 3 3 lref[oust ' J 1/1,000 12 I2 Ntlti=tenant 1/400 109 109 Total 124 124 1 II. ANALYSIS: A. Background: The p project is inte;.ded as speculative multi- Tenanf ease space. This type of use 'Fs consistent within ' Subarea 5 in which it is located. A concern of the Technical ii Review Cammittee_was an open drainage charm,-3 which runs-' north/sd4th alor' ,, the west property line o€:>the project, Through ,iegotiations with the Engineering.y Qivisian, !1 satisfa6- � solution has been reaehed.� Review Committee. The C B. Design � awittee (Chitiea, hkNiel, o eman ,},rev ewe the pro ect on June 18, 1987 and recommended approval ;,subject to: 1. The a,�plicant\3hould contact County Flood concerning the eastetJ most driveway on fth Street to provide a shared access';to the San Bernardino County Flood Control District property adjacent to the east of the project site, 2. A detail of the- Aaza area sfi uld be provided for review- by thq Planning Commission. 3.. All roll-up and man doors should be painted the same primary color as the building. 4. Texturized paving similar to that used on-site should be provided at the project entrances. S. Vine 'pockets should be located along the back sides of building 1, 2, and 3 and planted with a fast growing vine. 6. Both the accent colors and the graphic treatment of the agent color stripe were acceptable as proposed. r. � r j} r •w,r- mom` �'14'�6"�.. v;:. y hon Staff Report rks[ ARCHITECTS page f+R Envirorp entAl Assessment: Part I and LT of the Initial:, Stu( nave been r*ompfezed and no significant impacts have been found M related to the, construction of the proposed-build. ng. III. FACTS FOR F14OIW' The proposed use is consistent with the enera 'W` ustriat Specific Flan. The building design and site plan together with rtc:d manded conditions of approval are in compliance with the Oavelopraent Code and all other applic&i City Standards and will not be detrimental to the public health,. Safety or welfare or materially %furious to propartiex or improveme is in the area. IV. R£C"EKDATI'4N: Staff recommends that the Planninj Commission approv, eve opment Review 87-20 and issue a n*gative declaration hrou ,adoption of the attached Resolution, liesp u su tted, r, Bra Su ler r City P annex Be: :vc Attachments; Exhibit "A" - Location Map r, Exhibit "a" -Site Plan Exhibit "C* _ ,E1?YxWons Exhibit "D" . Landscape Plan Resolution of Approval 'with Conditions t _ I r y w r , a � If eMOW f t� PRCXJI=S 7th ST � pu G1h ST ffm CD z j z ? 4th ST Lt G ST 1-10 FV4Y VICINITY RSA NOM-ri CITY OF TITLE`_' '�4--- . .—. PL�,,.�t�tl�`G L7Ix'ISI�'�1 E,XHIBdT:�AL SCALE-Ue .;tw.n 1'.l .. '�a�.r� �p'•y}wF ...K, .: ..�"' r.'!i"g �5" c,.� aw 1 _ •�1 V J'l FRI 51 c. �� s4 - t a �� FDA F °'1 : •�IX Jt { }s`.!'�1 t I ` r517'tPLAN t � �� w'� ' _ �a.l�•� 1 �> �LI � (.�a1 � � r�'.K.f4d1wC Hlt.'.IYF wa_`J..—,q4V a�.`�1A+bnt ,d { ' �..'..✓+a+.ir I ...-i'ti a.. i 1C'� �Yw...: AAt+:.;�.i+: :aJ pe .' •____— 51%T44 :SYNEET I t�'4RTH CITY OF { Rt1NC CUCA.ML OI TGA Tnut II'Frkl P ANN1NG I?IVISION EXHIBIT.--- Smell. r —T `6�ld '. rayr .,k `y�idui A ## j �-• s� r � tf.itatwv•w.• �s. �� '� � r � _ 3 f. tw w euR is Y tew.u5y�u._, ..�! �syy� i �r i 1 : � � �� r l •� t r t�� t �j t �i 1��..._� �(-- ._SIXTH STRF_ET fit.* L.. _—- ate. r--•_ TLSE TRELLIS 'BOVE I SECTION A 4 ; ONCRETE 0 CITY OF IlPLCfE/PW=RM aftM PLAZA t T T PLANNING DIV6M Tom'-- EXHIBIT.---_SCALE:. i U-10 RESOLUT—I .NC.. Ax RESOLlITtON Q6 .; l2 4tJCHQ,CUCA!!fONCA PLANNING CmSSIQN AP RQ,d+N6: DEi4EL10(�lENt I iki,'t t Wi 0-20 LOCATED A7 THE NOR:,N sr CORNER.1F TURl18Rti At�NJs~" AND. £"T Sy ET INS THE GNNM& 1NQUSTR 1tL. KAMM APR,. 209-201,48, 1% M2. WHEREAS, on.'the 13th° AM of May, 1987„ a comp ete appT i caif.on was fii ed by Lennon Architects,for reviewe of the above.-descriiaeed,project, and WHERM, ,on the ath day of July., 19&7, ;the Rancho,Zucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above-dese.»ibed proj,ectA. NOW,. THMME, the Rancher OUcarmnga Planning; Commission resolwd as fol I ows,: ` SECTION,1:: That the.,following can be met: 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives, of the General Plan, and 2. That theproposed use is in accord with the objective oi' the Damelopocat Code and the: purposesr of the district in which"tbe sits ti Tocated,. and 3. ' That the proposed use is in- compi,iwance with Baca of tnei appii,cab a proaisi�ons bf tNe flevel',opment Code, and 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto., will not be detrimental to tho public health, safety, or welfare. or materially injurious to properties or Improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That this project w4,11 not create adverse impacts on the environmen an at a Negative Declaration is issued on July 8, 1987. SECTION 3: That Development Review tic,-R, 20 is approved subject to the following con Lions and attached Standard denditions: Planning Division: 1. All roll-up and van doors shall be painted the same primary color as the building. 2. Textured,, paving similar to that used on-site shall` be provitkd at the project entrances. 3. Vine pockets shall be located along the "back" sides' of buildings 1, 2, and 3 and planted with a fast growing wire. i PLANNING CC}tISS"jN �EaStUTION I)O;. s ,s Davelopment4evfer�'87 .D = Lennon Architects July II, 198-7" Page Y I � 4. The. applicant sfa1.I attemQt to coordinate with San Bernard'ina County flood Control District relocating the eastern nPost driveway on 6th Street to accommodate a` shared access to the adjacent channel to the east of,th,e project site. I = Engineering Divi^slon 1. Overhead Ud,ilfties a. 6th Street - The existing overhead utilities (electrical caunication and electrical, except for 66 K.V. e'leetr:cal) on the project side of 6th Street X, shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the west side of Turner.Avenue to the first pole off-site east of the Deer Creek Channel prior, to public improvem"ts acceptance or occupancy, whichever occums first. Reimbursement ,of one-half, #e sifference between the undergrounding cost c ,he utilities (electrical communication and elects.," =I) r on the project side of the streWl minus those (telecommunication) on the opposite side of the street is feasible because the property is currently undeveloped. b. Turner Avenua - An in liect'yfee as contribution to the future undergrounding cr the existing overhead utilities--stelecaamuni cation and electrical) on the opposite side° of Turner Avenue shall be paid to ?he City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fees shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the property from the center of Shi:.ron Circle to the renter of 6th Street. 2. A storm drain pipe shall be constructed along Turner Avenue and the existing channel eliminated to the satisfaction of the City engineer. The limits of said storm drain pipe shall be determined by the City Engineer. 3. The project shall be protected from fl��Ad flows entering the site from Turner Avenue to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4. Notice of intention to form and/or join the Lighting and Landscaping District shall be filed with the City Council prior to recordation of the map or issuance of building permits, whichever ocrurs first. 5. Street improvements on 6th Street shall be constructed to J extend to the existing bridge to the east. �S ,Ohnon Architects Page 3 G. A dr v#, ap`,4ch-and' 'xvwnt Within P ri� the Flaos# Contra eases* SWI rise �consteatted to tho sad;isfaetian of the F!4u4,Obntrol District. >y �� APPROVED AND,ADOPTED,THIS $'FH`D'AY° OF Nt:ILY, 1987. PLANNING C iI°SSIM.'OF GE`OITY OF,RAKH0 COCANO14A t BY: Larry n ATTEST: ` -Brad ti er, epuzy Secretary J Bran Bulle I Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission at o'e rl mo � pancho Cucanga, do hereby, certify that Ue foregoing Resolution( �1 fly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the �Planniing'Cowds' ion of the fi City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning,Go+m sston held an the 8th day of J41y, 1987, by the Following vote-to-wit: (( . V AYES: COiiISS30NiRS NOES: COMMIV411`HERS ABSENT: CUZZ T.SSIONERS: j t,' �o vrt�. �artl �� +L�� c�.� ya•p�� $� _. Jliib�i'��, - t� AL ti 74, apace uj tZ. $!w t1 �'+ QQT ti �� awn en� �A y ■7 $+nvi.+�o i <N� ,ter3 "dT 1=Z g. ou C t ho tl �¢. gtlYgY LL n CC • rp , �YA= �Lp j. tcQ C�pyY n.Yc1 Y A pv 4 a Ica ad G ig yy 3 77 6 � »- L� Un- r3. y' '7 »..s ffCL. S:»Er $:Eu+ urav p gY,i1: v•,j' `g-a' pE ,�$w."a �� ail �— o 4 e 8.5 n Lg2p q» y■$k�Yyy.�;.:..rS �§�YwSi';.�Y" yFy�Y �g €'Xis � M �€ Sd C�p YydX i U.'s `k,. $sg iN OT IR.I O N N »g M a v>9 S Rye �G.Y 3 a N a IC N raw��v�TliwNtd �g��s�t� 'Yc:. y4g Sit ys sY 4s YLUMi'' uyjo ;Ed= IL Olt :gi ��Fr as^a� »Ms8 s-w _ as 2riAL W ns uyi� .o o. a_ awyyy� ri "a : i i s e3 g n=' � �' ovv=" �c�€..� 6 s s` �-C _a Q��2 Ya 'l.J� ! p� N� 9i W8.V� MC� p�p �Y�U ~ YII a` y ]1Ia��F 'CaQ 4Y'`Ay �,+aY J S cl acts S Y L .�>«C q `O� id » �Alm C w Ly y spy p^.{� G to C1 i y _ �YLg Yj V situ -'QwL Y1 @x��Y.�. iI u yGen�.. ��N Y. i� '��e Q a�z M�� I �YY�Ri�.y C• �O9N�� •.La L�N I'` Yd :, apt �'� =gEEE�ji �Ya gL m ��"A�-i..� SC Sq COC C»D•r�L'N'' •��•- �~ Y3> L��' L$v Or`d �o �� gi.r�»,� �� 60a b�— Ol ty».+p+iy;�� Q WE i Hi \> Nr G Y i — gg� �.y V Y N» E Hik `N'3 �s«o i�na�' wx _Y c�•'.e�s R �� us�iu� Ygg.�u$ o 3 �a.�.y. O.• w H g yWq U b.�y' 1-4- 4 Q—z;g—u Cab ¢ 7 NtCroiOiy`ppwer 'SS 5+ y`..��uV VWJf yQLp�,pNyw�y«t.,F 3Vv,.t.�a8 aR� 9CCy j�V-K .4 yA90 yygw• .. K'yr• �"� `j fit.$ ..ya�� 'M1 {�+�i�n"'�S. y«�,� .r'�'p pµ. ari u, _+ ti i (4 a E N Rai -0 7,10 -.,JZ �N iy `€ „ aysR. 44Yf € y� $:8 Y`s�e' 1A} .t 11a 3- i p �- i.:�, �.1'^p. M 73- y iJ. lit mpg .41 ig; � " ""j �'wygl y� cc Sff �� 3Ya-' Y parr �+-•a:�. y." SLY '�"'^� $M�'^ Y��,�$`'�.'-�y� y��t1 yC� p 35 a 621' � J! �!4 �q �� Y 144 MNr Y�n�L�Vb Z:5Wx ati.L.$ 'ciao tia: a 43 KN i wca n,',w .r yJ�[�)�{• J 4 �..:. I `i](v'/J•� F J+pI I P ' W I' vi en ��`A YR ty Cq f �MCC apt �� yil 4= �y N C � +L�N f¢ja^ YL Lwsn pi QGY La Zop�1O V'R 1fFY+ eti �=.r V� �i `�3 �OV .Cy pY.K, yY> yY A `6N e • iyM os 333 �. ;4 U0�� %�Y�u -Aix uj , y s . �" $_ � �ee= fig E3 �I�e' � vE� � ai'to B��, N�'�a. j y 0 BEE gsW't V p Sr">>S ►. .-. j 3 Y � IMYIs a3.+ -� !'3C 11��`. vv ��YC Lfi i3i3ee 713% .�Lr ppss, Y Oyuy � Q. f �V� a:.0} y�� a r Yvc`�� A Y O¢fY�y}3t Zia Y ♦�i3j0 eke g L43�j ^{i.�.�4�N^ L.tpYyy,.� Y L 01a .TOY FK F }�i� A:— —a NY �Yi 14 it `/uy1 Y lj►L?� O. L r C g iL ZZ al f Q N6 "�R I .Y' a" +" $c i yy`y1� $ YY f BEM • ' T+' .�..y y zY a �• J `a� y I 6 gl N Qr $ ;N lj x lb YN�y Cr0)l kyL Y1 qYo NS� 'J i M+ xIV^. C G 8 4 `ICY@ '^ a Yi ci 4ti•�C C G..a� 1T+C OY O V M jL 0 @ g^■p 'f��C{{ r Y}L 6py,6 3 i`�, X�E'N � C� !�^• YS� 6KY R4Mv CC�. WY. 41ES �YJV i ti Y N Nf s� MIZE � uLL ! +M•�O L 1 O ^ e Yppr �u0 tl �.. ` G��G�Giii Vm •�z t 4 C O u 0 13 Ig eg A��+. O�OY�� ♦t C�...V —y, y. � i � LV �. V ��.�..'� Wig, Ma �� t W 1 i y alaiawn L G rL 3.371 MAN �4if y_ -33 ry � 52 M�3 s: �5 -0 $ � ��8�' �a .•jam€�•L is Zy _ ew e 'uY . _+ �. $ y �;'Y' �Ny y �• � eF. 666� �' gag"�V �>}�aKy,�• 0•i.2�il �� V�yg�`` �= aw"r...yyy'yyy�TTT��Ya � r.1.Vl ♦w+sf a d1E S: 2� � HIM eyy®g�.� ��rt.]S4�•0�(((�$$$]j��• WN. if 5 Ih V--n P '.0.i�CCi p �L �P RHO �6s11r4 i \,\hgryj �YaaO Y CCw pit C N �pC AQ A' \ '!�I■p.'ji�b� LYC � O�Ou�� It �•$u ,'. = $ o �� a� ,$.� ,, S - �Y.i LOg6 GA . i �1 a q to 1 a a & 8 412 .21 `}' A 0 $- � + sy v S1 a Yea �� v yr� as. Sr � W ; tiy�p +Cu z! a:69y�u 35, r3 v`. s.> e� A a�g P "�BY f� 1� V W 1 x _ X"�� a it g g� D vi w1 `" q l Y Rw HYY S4 y j LL 6 gAis ` q. � � �• ,�i. y L�M �Y JA !� 6M-2 4 py, its p �4 p�(� � � Z:.:a- .. 2-4 x P: Las O V. LU 7 G [[ M aY � u0� N. { € l I.. C C y $we r '6 a,. 1- 7 a nf ,.0 .g ids�� "• u�dt�f{ .._ (yam +a$'{y. Is'�i Lam ' SEC if IV BO. � Li YMs y�O.+ �►..4 �- �41L y'�.n D d -— -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGtI STAFF REPORT w 7� a o DATE: July 8, 1987 v 19,77 > TO: Chairmi:: and Members of the Planning Commission _ u FROM: Brad Buller, C!ty Planner tY: Greg Gage, Assistant Planner r SUBJECT: HOME OCCUPRTION PERMIT 87-255 - CIV4EROS - Appeal of s a s ec s or, denying a Home cups of nTermit at 10736 Sundance Drive rY - ' I. BACKGRO%O: On ►�a'r 4,, '1087, Ms. 1lrayanne Cisneros submitted an. '. 'appTTcai: o—H fh. Home Occupation Permit to allow childbirth educaticnar;'Eours 4 within her dome located- at 10716 sundance Drive. TWe application indicates that 6 to 8 cc2ples would attend the s3,:�week course for two hours one night each week. Ii. ;,;kLYSIS: Home Occupation is defined by the Development Code as: "Horse Occupation: An accessory a cupational use con ucted by a resident of a dwelling as a secondary use F thereon. which is clearly incidental to the use of -the ` structure for dwelling purposes, and which does not change the character thereof, and for which there is no display; r'io stock in 'i,ade, no commodity sold on the premise's, and no mechanfe'zI equipment used except that necessary for housekeeping purposes." Applications for Home Occupation Permits are evaluated on tt')e bash of 14 specific criteria, to assure that such occupatl(ons are compatible with the residential character of the surrounding neighbors ood,, These inclukle: "The use shall not allow customers or clientele to visit dwellings. However .incidental uses such as music lessons, ,and the sale oi• produce, may be permitted if the intensity of such instructions is approved b the City Planner." PP Y Y "No persons other than members of the family who reside on the premisis shall be engaged in such activity," "There shall Le no change in the outward appearance of the building or premises, or ether visible evidence of 'the activity. i ITEM..,V �\ PLANNING C ABS-re SLAW REPORT „ HOP'87-255 �sNERUS„ July % Ig87 �. � Page . t. Staffs review of the proposal resulted in the determination that the use would not conforin'to the above criteria, for the foil-owing reasons: Up to 16 clients would re utarl : visit the residence 9 y simultaneously:,, resulting :irk' an intensity of use whichl would be imcomp&t-fble with the primary _'r residential; use of the. neighborhood. In allowing incidzintal uses such as must:' lessons, the intent of the Holm Occupatilon criteria is to permit indfvidu0fzedi instractton, not a group-teaching -' environment. Also, parkIng.constraints which result from a, group meeti-ng, at, a residence would not- normally be an issue for individualized music instruction, since, students typically are driven to ' and from lessons by a family member. cUp,to 15 persons other than family members residing on thc.'premises;will be regularly engaged in the Home Occupation activity. The resultant increase in pedestrian traffic would not be consfsteii� with the primary use of the site for residential purposes. I - The increase'�'in pedestrian and vehicular ,,traffic would result in visible evidence of the Home f Occupation. i Staff has encouraged the applicant to find a more suitable location, such as a public or private school, classroom, k auditorium, library or church. For example, a variety of instructional services utilize the Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center. Fees charged llor�'sach facilit are approximately $25.00 per hour for a private group u to 50 persons. III. RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis, staff'recommends ra .,a —m.,ng Commission determine the proposed Home Occupation jregu c nsistent with the intent of the Home Occupatiol i and deny the appeal of Home Occupation Permit 87-255. spubmit d, rad City PI ner BB.GGcns Attachments: Home Occupation Permit 87-255.Application Letter of Appeal' X,Ater of),Denial _w - Exhibit I-'A" - Location-,.wp ` Exhibit "'B" Vicinity Map City of Rancho amc Occupa�;idn Cucamonga �rr�� °c��,tian �r pp Z GENERAL INFORMATION 0 r LOCATION OF PPOPOSED MOMEpCCL'Pg710N va }NAME OF PP.UPOSEQ BUSINESS /{Ij` _ ri,.� APPLICANTS!'NA`ME Yl1th��hf. �� S ADDRESS y.� l Z F-V OWNER ❑ RENTER r Property owner's signature will be required,or I a signed statement from the owner approving d I such use of the dwelling must be submitted "'1 Wth this application. CL Property Owner's 5ignatyfe: f Z BUSrNESS DESCRIPTION LLI f FULL O° GRIPTiON OF PROPOSED BUSNESS—6£SPECIFIC M, �. tt / f - ,7c1.3�f' F (7C1 t' � i 6w .r:i.G�LR l;�f��,��t_� ✓;�� ►r L�_�fYt��;`t1GC T�.;�t,C�s-(� W e Gi�A t :` t J �71D✓t-ty)fi j, �r7 � APQ a, ACTIVITY Di,=SGRIPTION 4— FULLDESCRIPTfON OF BUSINESS ACTIVITY OCCURRING IN DWELLING,INCA UDING EQUIPMENT.AND AMOUNT OF DWELLING.USED— BE SPECIFIC Gci �A n a i O Cn� gkt �� r1 ;ye R (''Q, 'n o z - W I herebil certify have read the Horne Occupation Permit requirements, fully understand the Implications,and can comply with ail of these requirements. Cl- j �v syLn ��p s S---V4-:7 SIGNATURE DATE 'i Ds$ 's� ;: acascongalCa1.iPo:rnia 91?30 8��'. Ts BOW QCCUBMAM!"ON PFM'[= 87-255 rwQ*17ed as. lettor,of denia3:. huge 13: 19A7 far . a Hour Ccoutie�r3ks�s3:t; disallaatiag�.tht use of ha1Re•-fob'Chi.�db:Z` h pre ion ¢�8a<aloal! My9ligtb l ,� to reco��re' a Haase Occu; -tion Pevmit; ba"do uypon the faurteon listed cw,1tsria, was, rofus*4 dune to, criteria nu t&r f .re aiiel two �` raspecti�r��lyt. tt The us*- shall not allays cust nor@ or . rs3.i��t Za to visit dwellings. H+awsrer, sex such aw mvsio.'lessons, . and. i6 sale of produce `bd permi tteci if the Intensity of such instrraat axt is approved by the• City PIs ner. r grcposaax to you that win b►dwell r withl& that Ao=A1 limits of�.�i*a;ge t =01c. iastrnators, not only in client number butt7 the number of automobiles =" visiting the premasix. i No parsons other than members of the family who zesidae on the pexminie shall be engaged in such activity. As iaa criteria aumbsr 5, T hope to show-that tht der of cl ient-s and case are well within those of music instractora. who alsn teach i Plwob- v .ew')graph "le. I personally Inquired with *:10�_lopl music inatructOrs who teach in their Jss,. seeking fin AvOrag* clientele number per day. k "Aar yore can, see: by the yellowed area my class size would be within the not^& of music incttructbrmm. E yr 4 au � cuemts aaxs can: eas" Park of our diko. Tease view the" pi�attires A"u pages tha.` e the a 61" Wl "a" showy �'.ae3 Cr ga numbed cad' ` �eE 8ktez4" ze c lxstruEctgal�s hoetep peer ct .g a+. '�, �c t v yellows, area show yo s , the 1Wftrg;�e ti.'. numbe Eo: + to VYf h J.ay* t}16 1TO195r. OIL, .; s Ofall Icy i'tu¢eetTief ii na gh� t %rs,4"*Z* to allowing cry ? ,parC' old .13e scree iYl f-out of their Asyoui nc ices:olf-� hams tri*d to wadors d the reguremea4r they gcsme Ocoups Q der its and s iov� t}_it CFia 3 to de'd uae of zY htaaat bhiu e of ttse ,guysierlizee.. sae privaw use of , our hotte ie l.tiu.t `. our hom.*..,, bUsbaud and a,bludifi are able to remain comfortably at homes during alixjxes.� 1 alb }L aationa3,y;r) rtifl*d }enildbirth"i-aktructor with tho �e�#c 5ocioty of Prog laria iu i7fssfi:•t 3cse Q giui t"ba and { clesil^a 'tow eei• a thot is co unity." hods you W= asai ii in* IA ttr.�Ms to Vol* at this problem to thw =tual bq tit;of nwee1f and Hancho cuoam6uga oiii rvi�t J .giACleY`e�"� Wri� �4ia► 1t. exa+eroae �pgistered Nurso ASPO Cera tiflad CUUdbirth Educator r if r� 4E .d df fd TIM xcsm�sere to thr left'of the &mph indioate theME �I avera num geber of clients, enterIng the, home for, wAsic 1essolms per dare The tiLttials. at the top a" obveously my resources ques oas'a in our kcal ars&. The ;tellowed area represents MY ,eaTinnit cumber of proposed p poaeents 3n one 81asa. Graph w30 12 jl r �J This graph indicated the average number of parked Cara at a mvmiwc ine,truota---* hcuse P"er clay. The e�wsid area again repreffio my .majdm4=mbor Qf p—lo+ge cr �11jUU care per S' 4 r 4 t fe � Y •'fir � ! A �. 1 � y �.4.��'.Yf+^ � � S•�—.��._—�--•1.—..��AAA t K CI 1 r ! S •S.� +.':�'> T7,r'a ��. 1, Y if F ' 2t wauld'be :agreaa to with us to, have the .l` 2-4 automot lea;,that are,uasbie to,:Bark on the street is front of *4e Cisaeroe home; park 3n goat = Of our house. This occure no more than twice a week.,, House number 1� 3Dte 10753- _- . 7iti� .. /c 7a)' J?-7 � t Id7 Thee cliell]l:libs Inu ,m bs coming :for a two-hour childbirth PrePara olea aeries. • jW � 7"hanY you, Wrayannee E.,Cisneros a z; fi f _ _ C11Y OF RAMP CUCAMONGA rft ana aA MT. June 11, 1987 Wreyanne Cisnet'o�� 10736 Sundance Drtv+s RanchO Cucamonga,, California 91730 SUBJECTZ HOME OCCUPATIDN PERMIT 87-255 Dear Ms. Cisneros The City is, in receipt of your, application of May 4, 1987 for a Home Occupation Permit to hold childbirth courses at 10736 Sundance Drive. The intent of a home, occupation is to allow a res�i�dent to conduct an + accessory occupational use that is contained ent-frAy.within the home, and is incidental to the allowed,residential Lose. Such uses should nest vary greatly from those normally round within a residential area. The eligibility of a use for a Noma Occupation Permit is determined through the evaluation of fOurtee,n specific criteria, which are listed on the back of the Home Occupation Permit application. Through staff review it has been determined that the proposed use does r6t meet-the folloiwing criteria. o No persons other than members of the family who rk-lde on the premises shilll be engaged in sucl activity. Your application indicates that twelve to sixtety% persons other than family members would attend classes at tl a residence. As noted above, such class mett#ihJs would rot be consistent with the Home Occupation criteria. o The use shall not allow customers or clientele to visit dwellings. However, inrr��4ewtal uses such as music lessons, and the sale of pt�b'duce may be permitted if the intensity of such instructions is approved by the City Planner. It is the City's determination that „regular meetings at the residence could adversely impact surrounding properties by intensifying vehicular and pedestrian traffic. I'I . xn.. > N.8Mv% c k 7 [ Cks xte+i�ir Daaaaa L�euot ��" ii 4 PaG. Oue to the rearms aboyr, Y-wr applIcatfon for a Hie OccuAatfcx Permit f�as treert�d� igxi� titsci"s# nsr �e appeared �ti;htnn ( Q dais by submft,�img, anii apts�a� inn: ,ws�'Ftf�g ta they Planning, Cam�nissf�on 5e.cr.�t�ar-y no hsft�ta to�oni„ eP7 ahin9 O n at3 SaseLne�Ruad or Simcb ety. C 0 PA 2TtRT ING DY Odt s., G exart Senior Planner cc; Betty King, Buss=nos License i r I I } 04, "Pip I jjj ,ram A,.. 2A A - w � TJ a G�c ea �y.a! 6i-sus - _- 4t7 tT" � �� _ TO ell l s L to k c� r 3�is ?x.zL` a It <PI gsc,*i' �p4►sa {gZ� �r hFes p° d� �`� Q� �` ° " • �+ g o go } it CUY OF ititORI'f-I RANCM CLVANKMA PLANNUNry T)I'JtSM t -' a wl Aq t. r loft 1 MAW j, 7 _, CrrY OF Rt`�, r �2TE� SaL`G �1? �+BiSJisk Pt". ql CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Ge t STAFF REPORT j r O O� DATE: July 8, 1987 F z r U t0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Canenission �1977 > FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner r BY Chris Westman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMiNT REVIEW 8+7-04 - TOWER PARTNERS (EDWARDS CINEMA) reqUeSt W MO MY tne approved a eva ons by substiituting an arbor along the north and south elevations for a 3/4 inch reveal for a ,;;theatre located at Vhe northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue: - APN 1077-104-I, 3.. i 1'. BACKGROUND: The project was originally approved July 24, 1985., � e approved building elevatons called for a furring detail on the side and rear elevations. `lle furring was intended to, help delineate colors as they'changed, or each rurface. On Apr,i 23, 3986, the Planning Commission considered a request by the applicant to waive this requirement. It was proposed by the applicant and agreed upon by the Commission that a 3/4 inch reveal could have the same effect as the Purring to delineate t1-142 color bands around the building. The applicant th?n received a permit allowing temporary occupancy of the theatre contingent upon tampletio� of the 3/4 inch reveal. As work progressed on site, the approves ,reveal was omitted., A tool joint groove was used instead. On',January 28, 1987, tine applicant came back to the Planning Cor..niss 'on requesting that the 3/4 inch reveal requirement be waived in lieu of the tool joint groove. The applicant felt that the `tool joint groove served the same intent as the 3/4 inch reveal. The Commission felt that the tool joint groove was inadequate and required the applicant to develop other alternatives. One suggestion uas, in addition to the tool joint groove, the ,possibility of adding trellis work along the north and south building elevations to reduce the visual mass of the building. 11. ANALYSIS: As proposed, the arbor is to be constructed of 4 inch metal" tubing forming arches spaced at 24 feet on center. One inch minimum horizontal tubing will connect the arches. The color-. proposed is Virginia Dare green and the vine selected is Chinese jasmine flower vine. The prapose:i locations are on the north and south sidrs of the Edwards Cinema, running horizontally and adjacent to the building faces. ITER V 7 D} tC^l 0xy IS �8 TQ/1ER'MRTHER5 81�F .A y� Fuy g There are��ree ,sub x•whar�h Est ba co sl dere6'�,,-They L.. Thte} i bt of the mastery ail s-an�kisi�n o w3h ;as Tsrgs ar= s:,a?f.tt►e,st and ad�o�r Ong motes. str-00u * is gx�=ty" Of the et T t b*ngl sre�.tfic 11 the 3. The rep at�o of a, structure" to property+ lines and ti �2qui;r`e�sk��i�ard s�i6:aoi�=« Design RevrttM► Do lttee .:coalaeg4 s fr5tn the July 2:� 1987 ra:.ati°riy,, l regardi'rng iit tr*61 z wilft a'yailabiKe at the Kann$ng Commi0eWh " II. RECt}hiMEtiDA DBw Staff recommends. thai.f- _ planni'ng Commissic� cons F er the, ap T cant''s. request along w4th, recormnenda.16as fro in he 0, Rev ew Cowttee'.—M4 provide the applicant with prop. ditrectian. , t Respe ul ` su it+ted,.. l B ad'Su '.er, City P anner.; BB; :te Attachments: planning Commission lRinutes of January , 1987 Exhibit '40 - Arbor detail g Exhibit "B" - Arbor Detail!- ;N f 0 li Chairman Barker stated from whai:� he heard, it would be a concurrence that applicant the should apply for. a, Gondi ti onal Use Permit. Mr. Bullar advised .teat Staff would be asking the applicant for a full E di-sclosure as to the Qkxtent of the use and would ask the applicant to address the question of what ptNcentage of the use .iS in the category of light whoiexi e, storage and distribution or custom manufacturing, } Commissioner NcNiel stated that close attention should be paid tort/public .A health and safety issues for wbatev+tr 'type of nuisance factor would be gene aced fgr'ti* adjacent businesses. ► 44 Oil'S REPOWTSOn _ 0. AWARDS FOR DESIGN EXCELLENCE PROGRAM UPDATE Dan Coleman, Senior Planners presented the report. - Pt iisssioner Toistoy suggested that the project be identified on 'the award Commissioner fir ck suggested that if a person wins %p,% award, provfMons should be made, to allow t1iA recipient, at his ova `isqpense, to get an ealargewent of the emplem to afix on the outside of the buitaing.. AL It was the consensus of .the Planning Comission th;�t the entire Commission. should be involved in this ^apittee. Staff is to return with possible workshop dances; P, SAN SEVAIN£/ETIWANDA PLANNIKS AREA: WORKSHOP - This item has been rererred Dy tne uesign ev ew 01 e, it is requested that a Workshop be scheduled for full Commission review and polio direction. Tha applicant for this item was not in attendance; therefore, it was the ,consensus of the CO=ission that the item be continued to the February 11, 1967 meeting. MY Ci9i�41@} - Ibe;-request ro MRy approa a eve on, y e m na ng r�equ red reveal, for a theatre located at the northwest corner of FOothitl Boulevard and Haven Avenue. Howard Fields, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report, `? Planning Coamission Minutes -.25. January 28, 1987 s , v; - a Chairman Barker fnvit d' public comment. David project developer, gave a history of tide,situation. He'advised, ` that herofo�- ned to determine, some alternative that the -Planning Commission might consider. He did 6V'feet that puttin��in the reveal at .this timre is necessarily the corm.:t thing to do. he felt the intent of the: reveei had been satisfied', Not T 9jo understood that it is clearly a condi'tion of approval and fnderstood that-'tie condition could not just be omitted. , He introduced Glee Gellatly fio'present.tree alternative. •�� Gleli Gellatly,. 6"ssell. Architect ., presented tires alternative to use a winch ' by one inch annadized .gold alumiOum channel ,end j&Rplyi, g that in a horizontal fashion not unlike the trip that acts as i4 housing or the lighting tract. He felt that would..be an elsme"t. that c xd tl tv,«„se; two items together visually and yet look like it was alw ays meant �o r.�a that way. Bawd Michael stated, that to,'.i#y` to retrofit the reveal in to correct the r ' M mistake and to put a gold"band around the building wound not acco plash anything. He off;red a second alternative to contribute a set amount to the historical committee allow them to purchase artifacts, decorations, and displays for use within the grape crusher building!. He .suggested that a. ., dollar amount could be placed on what it would c&.1t to address tho reveal issue. Chairman Barker agreed that to retrofit the reveal apuld be a bandaid approach to the problem and wa :concerned that which goes on will come off.. suggested that another flans of architectural enhancement might be used as a alternative and suggested one alternative might be the lowering of the light lumens. He felt those things that impact the total of the area should be addressed_ He stated he would be willing to continue this item to allow, the applicant to cope up with specifics, on those kind of alternattve�. {:- Commissioner Tolstoy hesitated to enter into any kind of agreea?ei which looks like a buyoff. Ne thought the issue to be addressed by the developer is what is- going to enhayIce the building in question. Chairman Barkgr_;#tated he would prefer that alternatives not just address the building In q` estion, but some architectural enhanc",' t to the total of the project. Commi ssf over Tolstoy',asked if there was an architectural feature or element unique to this deveioa� t that ties the entire center together. Mr. Gellatly advised flat the tower element was introduced on the theater and the quadrafoil was,-fntroduced in the tower, which were r+eoccurari.ng themes, along with the trellis work at either side of the huilaing. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if tW reveal was a part of tying the buildings together. Planning Cco mission Minutes -26- January 28, I Mr. GelTa'tly rgQled that the reveal was required to create a logical Tine to make a color chi" e.' The. rtasOn for the color Change ►xas to reduce th appearance scab of A-fie,.OU1,ld1 , e OsuaT Mr. BuTieraivised that Ariginal ly there was !r it ngWd �'1 ghi;Ch took a portion of Eae Wall aid;dro3ected t"t but fr0m,.he rest of the ].1 It was at the re�ues�r of the appi can£ that the de�naii� deleted, In�t� di�sCussiaa of that detail, the 3, 4 f, ,reveal s intro cad as a c r'o�lse. intent of the des#gh .of t#ie thha�ter was. to have a �u'rring diTTthE for dri thislower Color band,which,pat out'.froga the oche», One of the a; events which also ties rtre 66i1dirigs fogather is, the unique stucco textura. CPiairrgan Barker suggested they architectural enhancement be of- He -equal weight. v He stated he wouxd�� wig°ling to entertain that kind of C' q � bmproiavo. '. Comissioner McHiet stated that for°the developer toga back and cut a reveal - c 'tax an opportunity for water�.to get in and they would Have a grea-; deal of dip trouble es4 a results. - Mr. Buller stated that one of the unifying elements of VW_-center has been the I trellis work. The color chane and furring detail were intended to help break up the scale of the,wall. PE sed are twa office buildings on either side of the theater. The bulldi)g to the north has been reviewed by the Commission and there is to be same type of courtyard plaza area between the two buildings, He suggested the possibility of tretl#s,.work to reduce the visual mass of the building. ;He furthr:, stated that because there my be aparking Problem, it;the softh side of tWbuilding is used as a parking lot insteadof a building, trellis work a]ong that side would also help break up that expgnse, of building, Commissioner Chitiea advised that the reason the furring was required to go all the way around was to also give detail to the back of the building. She, stated the Community trail is at ti:�t back of the bui]ding as well as the parking Tot, and she felt that architectural element was n essary and important. She was not unwillingrr to look at adding the gold elnt, if it was done well, in that it is ail element that sticks out and achieves the s' Layered effect first 'considered. She suggested that the roof screening element be addressed as pa,;t of the architectural upgrading along with the reduction of the light lumens. Motion:.' Moved by Chitiea, seconded by McNiel, unanimously carried, to continue Development Review f,746 to allow the applicant to develop alterritives for the Commission's consideration. Planning. Commission Minutes -27- January 28, I987 ri y �,�FR -T, , ' I Y 4 r r .b f�' w- 4 I %Pf1 Y! r 1r � /�rl.�/•!�i u • t:. R-'- ni.t�'�® f MOB - w NTH 2C OF T iTEci�t= 7i1"s CUCMONGA TITLE: t.... PLA.NNI,NU DIVLSKJI'd . EXHIBIT=---. .SCALE- ` p '07 '1 QTY OF t k N. N., RANCH CUCAi1rIQi `G 1TE;at. �"� A Tm E. PLANNING i3NISK)N E7tHIBi'!`: r � f w. f { f3 ' I — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA =) STAFF DEPORT DATE: July 8, 1987 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Ruisell H. Maguire, City Engineer, a BY: Slane'W. Frandsen., Senior Civil Eng'nee SUBJECT i MILLIKEN AVENUE GRADE SEPARATION 'AT A.T, A S..F XLROAD Report on PA.C. ftirings and Aitfornate Design ons r erra eons In December of 1986, the r'arms of DeLeuw Cather Engineers b Planners and' L.D. King Engineers were engaged by Professional Services Agreement to y prepare a federal grant application for -the,subject project, as we'll as project designs.. In April of this year, the grant application was reviewed by the Public Utilities Commission and was issued a priority number with regards to receiving a grade 'separation grant. DeLeuw Cather has been assigned to report to the Commission the outcome of the hearing. They also, due to the low P.U.C. ,;priority, would` _ propose alternate design schemes to reduce the project cost, and to increase the possibility for Grantor other funding. I Staff would like to request the Commission's review of the des{_a alternatives aW would seek a recommoeidativn with regards to an .. overcrossing versus undercrossing 5s presented by the project' consultant. -r� � y I The recommendation will be taju- by staff 1' Ahe City Council who will finally direct staff and t`ie consultant en ,,dv to further proceed with the project environmental reviews and plan preparation_. AIULYSIS: The c,ange from an undercrossing to an overcrossing reduces project expenditure and increases consideration for receiving a grade separation grant in the future. Staged construction would also reduce initial of fundsect cand/or fun as ding to widen anll as increase hinptialbovercrossing constructctive edabt the City. ITEM X e 7' to T Staff^f waig-4, L t a frt'xa, as and oerros e - rcrossrsg ton s .n lid wid`enf�g� �The im tial coerstru ASf �ll�s ewir1g� slc 1.ahei + , [�e futstre as, traff-it: a+ �d T fttl�l s dab dkoWkt for.,. -x lanes beisng canstry ot e rn a1 eagitrcian.: �. 4 t 44 :. .� r1 �r_ CITY. OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORTn 1977 G DATE: July 8, 1987 g TO., Chairman and Berbers of the Planning jommission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner 8Y: Can Coleman, Senior Planner SUBJECT: VICTORIA COMUNICY TRAIL FENCING I. BACKGROUND; On June 17, 1981, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council a op a s£andards for the design of community t-rails that required a 4 to 5 font high two-rail white extrud{' _4'oncrete fencing. Subsequent installations of this fencing material were prone to rapid deterioration .and breakage which prompted a reevaluation of the trail fence standard in 1986. s On October 17, 1986, the Trails Advisory Committee completed a review and analysis of alternative trail fencing materials. The '!nmmittee reviewed numerous alternatives, including PVC, fantaboard, woad, aluminum and concrete. Their review included field trips to actual installation sites ane meetings with product manufacturers. After a thorough analysis, the Trails Committee determined that l'VC fencing would offer 'lie best alternative in:---- terms of cost, ease,of installation, ease of maintenance, safety, and maintain a high quality aesthetic Image for the community trait. The Planning Commission reviewed and approved the use of PVC as a comity trail fencing material on January 28, 1987. The Trails Advisory Commfttee is in the process of revising the Equestrian Trail Qvidelines to reflect this changg,. ' (see Exhibit II. ANALYSIS: The William Lyon Company is requesting that mood fencing e use (rather than PVC or concrtte fencing) along community William trails within the Victoria Planned Community. The uestr Lyon Company has expressed concern with the appearance of the PVC and the long-term wintenance and availability of the PVC fencing material. Specifically, The William Lyon Company is concerned that the PVC material may become brittle wind weak when exposed to ultraviolet light, .-...-....:a.' tea{ 7.1 YIGO } aT Page 2 The trati's' AA�o t ittee� has reviewed, and. approved thy. �� ro ased� for Ali MHO pee, 'Bxh4'bk pro :;sed wGod � 1 p „ The prQ bS, �d catk at 4�t foot him -rail ram. fe*,ct. The fe o uc of eciwro,�br Via a l ame;master Trail°5 Cow i t *MS a'Pp�p� �4, '� . planned c Y' oa =: ir a �,cha�ra and identity. itaiih va Ram tsa r: is l e i� esign copponent OF Y ctorfa and e+ '�e La,g �S pie � ot��014s, stlrea�t "tt►e tilfiia ,:. sYetl twa eni1or s0tM06 for the Tralls Coweittees co ones l) tptr. and 2r site., the Hilliara t'van ppoan� A phi tart =coi,or; hoOwer, Cat Wa gri%Y of shear j>2a Yy Advisq y` tes` fe7�`tsa that., white shiiii$& be used ccrrsistently out the �i�ty ref` A uwaho Wbamonga to idenntify Putr r�-Lo a ty tr i'1°s,. Colored r doderf", s of both color sc�*eares will be,4*vailahl, at the°caeting for your rmvi"r.. III R CDMMI:t�1DAZIDH. ' 1he `Trails Adv'UM Committee recommends that the•- {ln theme Victoria PraVe t C atth d wood equestrian fenc R- deta b mu Respectfully submitted, Br l er it City t anner BB:DC.te Attachments: Exhibit "A` - PVC Fence Details Exhibit *B" - pi-oposed Hood fence Detail -r fU CA ri �� Fi 4 r Q r/. C = r , '+1 � rr-v t Sits A '47 b-d v r 1r6' �If yG i� I ' r 4 te vNOR i kiln Fo wo-V k ujlu u 4 rL 06 rc Ju CA 4 `0 cfl s� = z LU ` a I L LUt t ..0 K , —,Z 41,4-M W, m - CITY OF RANI VO CUCAMONGA STAFf DATE: July S, 1987 tsr TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning C.-mission FROM: rQrad Buller, City Planner BY: pa",oleman, Senior Planner SUBJECT: VICTORIA OFF-SITE SUBOMSION SIGN PROGRAM (. I. BACKGROUND: On April 1, I987.,, the�uity Council adopted Ordinarxt;e No. 30 "'which establishes regulations for off-site subdivision ! directional signs within planned communities. Staff has beon F working with the 411liam Lyon Company to issue a sign perrmit�7or n their existing off-site sign program for Victoria. Jim Bailey with the William Lyon Company has,requested an opportunity to discuss.., the potential for revisions to Ordinance No. 309. tI. :ANALYSIS: ..D �`Ig discussions with staff concerning the application o r finance wo. 309 to Vtct�lria`s sign program, the William Lyon Company has r, ised the folldWing nsajar concerns: A. Number of .Signs Permitted: Ordinance No, 309 was drafted to parallel e ex sting BIA sponsored off-site subdivision program used City-wide. A maximum of six sfin panels may be used to lead customers to the site in the BIA program. Within' the planned communities, Ordinance No. .309 allows a gmaxinum of six signs to lead the customer to the site (see Exhibit "A'). However, i Section 14.20.065L states teat developer,, within the plznnod communities may 3Tso participate +n the BIA program provided "that a combinati::n of a maximum of six signs may be used to lead customers to the site." From a practical standpoint, it maj take six signs 3ust'to lead a customer from the City limit„ on Base Line° }n Victoria. The off-site sign program within the Windrows VilYage illustrates what the William Limn. Company would propose as the minip , program needed to lead custoirV.s to the site (see Exhshvt O°). Fifteen sign panels 6-e used to direct customers to each of the three model home sal js offices. I _. l f TEM it ��- PLANNING COMMrSSION:SPpG" REPOBr VICTORIA OFF-SITE 5-40D1VISION SIGN PROGRM July 8, 1987 f. Page 2 r B. Retrofitting 1xisting Signs: During the review of Ordinance oF( . e aT nning Commission modified it to rerptire than the top header board contain the words "Manned cad: 1-ty", such as "Victoria - A Planned Goaimunity", The City Council revised this language to say that "the top header board shall identify the planned comwunity" (see Ex, "S'). The existing sign program for Victoria, whit !was erected `without sign permit approvals from the City, includes top header boards which read "Victoria Models% ' Staffs interpretation of the Ordinance is that the intent is to ,.use the full name (i.e. - Victoria Planned Community) rether than Just the " marketing name (i.e. - Victoria). Therefore, under this ini rpretation, the existing header boards would be required to be retrofitted to conform to this requirweent as a condition of approval of any sign permit for Victoria, purl , t to Section 14.26.020E of the Sign Ordinance. C. Use of Flags: A maximum ,f six flags are permitted by e Sign Odinance in conjunction with an approved s residential subdivision sales office (see Exhibit ti'). The flags must be displayed in the mediate vicinity of the sales office, and in no case may the flags be allowed t; within the public right-of-way. The William Lyon Company feels that they should be allowed to have flags along their major entry roads, such as, Victoria Park Lane of Milliken Avenue, because� their' models are located' interior to Victoria and are,\hard to find. { _- III. RECOMMENDATION: The William Lyon Company and staff are seeking input rom tf-e.Crarsi�sii on the posse; ility of a prr-N,ios'that ld al�# planned' Communities to va J from the SiL Ordinance sudNiect c aproval of a comprehensive- agn program, espect 1 , ubmitted, -- Brad Bu er City P nner - BB: :te t Attachments, Fktiibit "A" - ;ff-Site Signs Within Planned Communi` es L )ibit "B" - Header.Board Regulations 4iibit "C" - Flag Regulations { 'Exhibit "D" - Windrows Sign`�-roWam z.� ' z w"fie �� i .14-20.065 Permitted signs Off-sits subdivision directional si gn within P'ranrteo oamuni y- Ina Following emporary Sighs may oe perni e wi n any planned community, which was established pursuant to Section 17.14,.020, subject to the provisions lifted, "A. A maximum of six signs may be used solely to 1,iad customers to the site within, the aan"' coffin tv. =: ` !ilgns Shall oe located within the boundaries —of the Planned Community, except said signs shall not be 1'scated on peri•aieter streets to the Planned Community. i i" "L. This section shall not be construed as f} ` prohibit the t developers within a Planned Community fr{ participating in the. off-site subd#,tision sign program it-Aplemented and installed through li ! Building Industry Association (Bl'ki' proyj'ded that a combination of a maximum>of six signs ma (o�,' aewad customers to the site. t t NORM i CITY ( �: ` � grt�HO CU�' VICWE3► Trr PLAIyN tG DIVNON HUr. sr t>r: ` S -• 1 / Y 1' " B. Signs shall be no larger titan Sixty irtc.;es by ten inches ;)nd shall be groupea on a four•sidti 'ign structure as shown in Exhibit "A". The top header board shall identify Oe t1anned co ni TERRA VIS xA PLANNED co llll+ ,Y PAR-KVIEW P-,, ACEAPARTMENTS }Y ,ltri0UNTAINV IEUC CITY OF RACLUNMa\ Uk Tirr.E: PLPaIgNM DIVNUN ., :