Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987/09/23 - Agenda Packeti 0701 -0 o 9-23-.87 PC A end. f PITY OF RANCHO CQCA1N4QNGA C - O M V 1 V ITN �i.%SY 3a 1 ; C3 z AGE NM s 1 f 7 �1 1977 WEDN13SDAY SEPTEMBER 23, 1987 7:00 p.m. IWNS PARK COMMN1TX CENT 916:1 BAS rM 1$AI!TP110 CUCAMOIr<GA, CALdFflRN1!!> L Pledge of A .thi a . IL, Rx11 can Commissioner Blekesiey _ Commissioner Emerick Commissioner Chitiea Commissioner McNiet Commissioner Tolstoy llb Annowleemen4s W. ApMnl of Minutes Jaly 22,1987 August 12, 1987 Aught 26, 1987 V. Consent Calendar The foIIowing COttserei Cjiw x 1r ;;:ems are expected to' be r oxitine and ,. Znoi-aontf srsial. Thay wM be acled.on by the Commission atone VI, wi2rtout discussion. ' •if ,:npne lxas concern over any item, It should be removed for discussion. _ A. RESOT,UTIOXi OE DENIAL FOR CONDITIONAL_ USE PERMIT 87- ' 28 - MBSSTINGER - n, a request 'sr a Master Conditonal Use Peemzt to a , oBusiness Support Services, Convenience SgL6s and Service,. Fold and Beverage Sales in ; "�uildings 1, 2 and 3 of an approved iq�urtrial business park, ; ,,, the General Industrial " District, SuNpea 2, located on the south side of Arrow Highway at Bear Gulch Mace - APN 209-014&-19. B. ENW- ROWN1ENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELdPMENT RBYIEYF 87 -31 - 'TURNER d3EVELOP_>ti4ET'i' - A proposal to develop a multi tenant industrial park.��t of 3 buildings totaling 142,500 square feet on-- 1.29 acres in the G4 iieral �jdustrial District, Subarea 5, located: west of, Lucas Ranch Roai and north of 4th Street - APB' 210- Q71 -39, 57;x) l 1€L Pbblie Heerinp DN's follow' 1 terns are Public hearings in wK'ch c�reeerned individuals mdy voice their opinion of the related prof Ict. Plea>Q0 wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address theO G-- -- � -nission by stating Y) IIWIII a and address, An such opinions shall ;o&'dafted to .5 minutes Per f;Ad dual for each project. C. WVIRO 1iNTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL . tGIAi' 10 r = `TURNER DEVELOTMEriT CO- - A subdivision of 7.29 acres of land into 3 parrais in the General Industrial Development Distric , 9uharea(�5., located on the west side of Lucas Ranch Road, north of 4th Street - A:PN 210-071 -57, 39. D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSEWMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DiSTRTCT AMENDMENT 87-01 - CITy OF RAWUHHO CUCr3MONGA - An amendment to Title 17 of the Municipal Code Vertaining to the definition of State mandatacl recycling faeilities and thq'.,*iteria for design, location and operation of such "aacilities- (Cantinue6 from August 26,1987`.1 E- ENVIRONMENTAL A.SSESSME'U AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13727 JANSSENS -1,i residential subdivision of 12 single family lots on 3.53 arses ofr,iand in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling lWUi Per acre), located at the southwest corner of Carnelian Street anti ;Highland Avenue - APN 201-214-11. (Continued from F. 1'd3irlR ©ldh'vWTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN �MENDME T 87-04A - JOE DI IORIO /THE C Y A1tYN COMPAN- A request to amend the Lind Use Map of the General Plan from Lpw Densit^. Residential i2-4 dwelling units per acre) to C .mme -eial "for approximately three acres, located nn the east side of Milliken Avenue, north of Highland Avenue - APN 225-1,41- 29. I ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT' DISTRICT t�.MENDMENT &7 -02 - JOE DI TORIOiTDE CS.RYId COMPANY- An application to amend the Development Distriet Ma P from Caryn Planned Community '�o Neighborhood ,s Commercial for approximately three acres, located on the east side of Milliken Avenue, north of Mghland Avenue - APN 225 -141- 29. ii f: u #' I r- i 1€L Pbblie Heerinp DN's follow' 1 terns are Public hearings in wK'ch c�reeerned individuals mdy voice their opinion of the related prof Ict. Plea>Q0 wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address theO G-- -- � -nission by stating Y) IIWIII a and address, An such opinions shall ;o&'dafted to .5 minutes Per f;Ad dual for each project. C. WVIRO 1iNTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL . tGIAi' 10 r = `TURNER DEVELOTMEriT CO- - A subdivision of 7.29 acres of land into 3 parrais in the General Industrial Development Distric , 9uharea(�5., located on the west side of Lucas Ranch Road, north of 4th Street - A:PN 210-071 -57, 39. D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSEWMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DiSTRTCT AMENDMENT 87-01 - CITy OF RAWUHHO CUCr3MONGA - An amendment to Title 17 of the Municipal Code Vertaining to the definition of State mandatacl recycling faeilities and thq'.,*iteria for design, location and operation of such "aacilities- (Cantinue6 from August 26,1987`.1 E- ENVIRONMENTAL A.SSESSME'U AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13727 JANSSENS -1,i residential subdivision of 12 single family lots on 3.53 arses ofr,iand in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling lWUi Per acre), located at the southwest corner of Carnelian Street anti ;Highland Avenue - APN 201-214-11. (Continued from F. 1'd3irlR ©ldh'vWTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN �MENDME T 87-04A - JOE DI IORIO /THE C Y A1tYN COMPAN- A request to amend the Lind Use Map of the General Plan from Lpw Densit^. Residential i2-4 dwelling units per acre) to C .mme -eial "for approximately three acres, located nn the east side of Milliken Avenue, north of Highland Avenue - APN 225-1,41- 29. I ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT' DISTRICT t�.MENDMENT &7 -02 - JOE DI TORIOiTDE CS.RYId COMPANY- An application to amend the Development Distriet Ma P from Caryn Planned Community '�o Neighborhood ,s Commercial for approximately three acres, located on the east side of Milliken Avenue, north of Mghland Avenue - APN 225 -141- 29. F IW"I � �C i G. ENVi;ZON3lVl"�L ASSESSMENT AND GENEl3AL kU2 / ���� - PtZIG1£ PROPERTiTiS - A regeies# to 1 amei�1 �� �;,snd IIse fienient o the �enei^eI Plan Tram Dfice to Neig �na��i Comrruerciai for 3,58 acres of hind,. boated on tine south w est cos per of Lomita Court and Archibald Auentite - APN 202 1 RNVIRON113 Ni't�L ASSESSMENT AND DE VC MENT DLST fi BItiENDNiRNT gfi 3 WE1MT "Kr p1mRO - A reii'�est to amend Chas Levelopment District Map fi m "OP" (OffcelProfessionai) to "NC" (Neiginborhood Corr.mereial) for 3.58 acres, located on the souuthwest corner pf Lnimita Gdurt and Archibald Avenue - APN 20 '451 -83. H- E="iVlRO1MENTAL ASSESSM"WT AND GENERAL PLAN AIiL I ENT 87 -04C - AteM9� QN DLr � OPMEivTS rSC - A request to amend the Land IIse El7,ment of the General Plan ram 17lood Control and Medium Dens er Residential (8 -14 dwelling Wits per acre) to Low -Medium Denajty Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), heated on the southwest corner of Banyan and Milliken -- APN 2017971 -55. ENVIRONMENTAI, DISTRICT �3SE5SMENT AND DEVELOPMENT MENDM Rfi 87-OT - AHMAN�ON DEVELOPMENTS. INC An application ti amend the DevecViment District Map Pio Om od Control and Medium Density , Residenti&1 (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for 85 acres of land, located on the west side or Milliken Avenue, north of Highland Avenue - APX 201- 271 -55.; L ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GEN4RAL "ALAN AMENDMENT 87 -04G - TAC DEVELOPMENT - W request to amend the General Plan Land IIse Map from Low- Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) to High Residential (24- 30 dwelling units per p ^.re) for 5.05 acres of land, looted on the south side of Base Lift, "Road, west or Archibald - .-{PX 208 -031- 18, 19. ENVRiONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMp'NT 87 -05 - TAG DEI�LOPELOP T request to amend the Development Districts Map frulm Lrw- Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) to qh Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre) attached iVithThe Senior Housing Overlay District (SHOD) to h.4 base dis "Hat for 5.05 acres of land, located on the south side c±f Base Abe Road, west of Archibald Avenue - A_pN 208-031-18, 19. i J . J. ENVI R bio1MEXTAL AS3 KENT AND GFN& "L PLAN , Al&lEt`i73iiNT 87-04$ -i °AG= .DEViE(P1�T - A request fio amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan from Low- Medium :tes dential (4-8 dwelling units per, acre) to Office for 1.69 acres of land,, meted on the west side'tof Archibald L`mverun, . a south oi'�3ese Line Road - APN 2t ASI X7, 54, 55, 56 ttd S7. ENVIRONMENTAL a85E°SMENT kNl7 DXVELO`PMBNT it rc`r z4ftIBl4Di4l `t' 8146 - TAG DVFX0P - A rem# es¢. to amend the Development District Map �m Low Med uC >t lesidontial (4-li dwelling units per acre) Ja- Office Pr,i "ewional for 1.69 acres of land, Ia;ated on the west-j',Ie of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road - APN 209-031 -17, 54, 55, 56 and $7. K. ENVMONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Ai U DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMI DMENT 87-09 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCA�MONGA An .amendment to change the Development , District designations from the existing designations to Foothill 3oulevard Specific Plan (1:S.P.) r;' all propeaties adjacent to --Foothill Boulevard from Grove Ave' a to the beer Creek Channel and from the I -15 Freeway to E" Avenue within the Foothill j Boule:ard Specific Plan area. % X6.Q' .rt Y 13 YY Tr,: i'A'im i:P — 'iiie cievetopment Qr i -%o mutt famlly urd on 3. 0.1 i5, acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8 -14 dwelling units per acre), located at the southeast earner of Foothill Boulevard and Paker:Avenue - APN 207-201-30, 41, 42 and 43. Associated with the development is Tree Removal Permit 87-62 requesting the removal of a number of trees scattered throughout the site. ENVIRONMENTAL A�oMSMENT AND TENTA7TVRTRACT 13650 G`'EENVIENi ESTATES . - A resideitial subdivision a�td design reviolw of 140 tvwnhome units on 10.15 acres oZ land in the Modxum Residential District (8 -14 dwelling units per acre), located pt the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard grid Baker Avenue �-APN 207-201-30, 41, 42 art? 43. Associated with the development is Tree Removal Permit 87-62 requesting the removal of number trees a of scattered throughout the site. M. E V IRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 'AND TEEATIVE TRAi;T 13541 2411IARE - The development of 12 lot custom, subdivision on 4.3 aches of land In the Low Residential :district (2-•4 dwelling units per acre), located north of iced flill Country Club Drive at Sierra Vista - APN 207 - 411 -10, 207 - 080 -01 and 48. ' fl a p. a`�sf s} ice;' ,y 10 1 $i z $6 OI itmd Il 1�Let9iEtm ( F M Slnft per _s.j� $ak�J t� ��1r1Iti' . k1 ���t` :+� d,�gfe'T" lir1��.Y $aPf� 1�952f�eTltie� l�t�ttlG� 1V+�'tlr�ll til@�IR�OL'�$' P,ieCnnexi C`:OrErjt7Slri��,, losta"i:�"�t �e north�+is, aamte� of �e�ia Pe.*k Lena $rx� Mid► kvetue APN �G- 29:1 -1.3 atld i4'. 0. M'RAL PLAN U DATFS Wj' l OR WO1�l�t't} d� P. ,1l.EYEl3E CXF' Cikl`icSPT UAL DIMELOPMENT PIu4NS Fo R, THE I7 IN Tim VicT`nJ�IP. Y , VUL Ctrmmie Bad •° M. Pabur contme: This is the time and place for tne- 'iOnerai public to address the Commission. Items to be discus 4 here are those which do riot already appear on this agenda. X. Aanmeat The Planning Commission has adopted AdministratiW Regulations that set an 11 p.m. adournment time. If items go beyond that time, they Mall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. it VICINITY MAP -------------- X12 1 A w I T file RANCHO--CUCAMON( 1 u- 'Ell 11 lTTMTT ATT T] A ?,Tl7TT/1 lTTTl A X&-1T lt A STAFF REPORT a � r a Y ` o E $ z U > 1977 DATE: September 23, 1987 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Associate Planner SUBJECT: RESOLUTION OF DENIAL FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -28 - e request or a Master Conditional Use Permit t o allow Business Support Services, Convenience Sales and Service, Food and Beverage Sales in Buildings 1, 2 and 3 of an approved industrial bisiness park, in the General Industrial District, Subare4 2, located on the south side of Arrow Highway at Bear Gulch Place - APN 209- 012-1?. Z. BACKGROHNO: The Planning Commission, at its regular meeting of _epepi" eem a 1987, conducted a public hearing, regarding the proposed Master Conditional Use 'permit (CUP) as described above. The Planning Commission deterarined that a?',owing a Master CUP would not meet the.intent and purposes of such regulation; that it would set an undesirable precedent in th(- City; and that allowing a Master CUP for quasi- retail uses such as Convenience Sales and Services and Food and Beverage Sales would not greet the intent of the Industrial Specific Plan for this Subarea. The Planning Commission could not make the necessary findings to support this proposed Master CUP and directed staff to prepare a Resolution of Denial for their approval at this regular meeting. Attached for yuur review is a copy of the Resolution of Denial.. II. RECOMMENDATION: Staff ,,ecommends that the Planning Commission adopt ,8 aft Nced Resolution of Denial. Respe ully submitted, /r*a� net- BB:NF:ko Attachments: Resolution of Denial ITEM A RESOLUTION NO. A .RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING C(ftniSSION DENYi:. CONDITIONAL USE PED IT NO. 87 -28 FOR A MASTER CUP TO ALLGV BUSINESS SUPPORT SERVICES, CONVENIENCE SALES AND SERVICES, FOOD AND BEVERAGE SALES IN BUILDINGS 1, 2 AND 3 t OF AN APPROVED INDUSTPIAL BUSYNESS PARK LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ARROW HIGWdAY'AT BEAR GULCH PLACE IN TH°- z GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT - APN 209 - 012 -19 T: A. Recitals. (i) Messenger Investment Company has filed an application for the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit No. 87 -28 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Fermit request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On the 12th of August, 1987, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and at the.request of the applicant continued this project to the August 26, 1987 regular meeting. (iii) On the 26th day of August, 1987, the Planning Commission, again at the request of tyre applicant, continued this project to the September 9, 1987 regular me €ting. ('1v) On the 9th day of September, 1987, the Planning Corwnission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. occurred.. (v) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cur-,?=conga as follows: I. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on September 9, 1987, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a)" The application applies to property located at the south side of Arrow Highway, at Bear Gulch Place which is presently under Aft AV construction for industrial multi- tenant buildings and is designated as Subarea 2, General Industrial District. A -OIL" 1` PLAIINI NG COMMISSION RESOLUTION Nei. CUP 87 -28 - MESSENGER September 23, 1987 Page 2 (b) The property to the north of the subject site consists of a City park and apartments, the property to the south consists of new warehouse industrial buildings under construction, the property to the east is existing industrial buildings, and the property to the west is an existing industrial manufacturing building. (c) Allowing a Master CUP will not meet the purpose and intent of this,. quasi - judicial regulation as it will diminish tha opportunity for b-oad public review and evaluation of development requiret. nts and operating characteristics of those uses, so that all identified potential adverse impacts could be mitigated. the City. (d) Allowing a Master CUP will set an undesirable precedent in (e) Allowing a .Plaster CUP for quasi- retail uses such as Convenience Sales and Services and food and Beverage Sales will not meet the intent of the Industrial Specific Plan and the purpose of Subarea 2 which is to strengthen the manufacturing and warehousing activities. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to "L Commtiissio during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings facts set forth in paragraph I and 2 above, t-,iis Commission hereby finds an concludes as follows: is) That the proposed use is not in accord with the General Plan and the Industrial Specific Plan, the objectives of the venerai Plan, Industrial Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use will be detrimental to - the public health, safety, or welfare, or *iaterially injuricus to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use does not comply with each of the applicablL- pruvisions of the Development Code and the Industrial Specific plan. 4. This Commission hereby finds and cer,01fies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby cannot issue a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragrap 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby denies the application. 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. J I" L —. d� u PLAti�.. ��lTTE(Ni{�1. ? CUP 978 September. _ Page 3 APPROVED' Aid ADAP� THIS 23TH DA's OF SEPT-60f R. ISW. r. PLANNING COMMISS-1 CX OF TILE .CiT`f OF RAWRO CUCAM0,1" l �} ✓ By i; arry a ,. CRairman ATTEST ' "Bra� Bul I er, epu y` ec-re. ry 1, Brad Su1 Deputy .Secretary of the Planning Commission of th3 City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was :duly and regularly introduced, pawed, and adopted by the P'lanni Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Pla�ing Commission held r he 23th day of September, 1987, by the following vat`" -'to -wit: 4ES: COMMISSIONERS: , k J NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: E If n7rp t)" !tT E A AtnLYll /4 in A 1k rnarn A 1. 40JECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requdsted: Issuance of a Negative Declaration B. SurroundinggLand Use and Zoning: HorT.nn Industrial,' ZUbarea 5 (General Industrial) South Industrials Subarea 5 (General Industrial) East - Vacant, Subarea 5 (General Industrial) West - Rail Spur, Subarea 5 (General Industrial) C. General Plan Designations: Project teGenera n• ustrial North - General Industrial South - General Industrial - East - General Industrial West - general Industrial D. Site Characteristics: The site is paved, has a steel beamed cZnstrucfian canopy, a trailer and chain link fencing. The site is being used for truck trailer storage. A rail easement exists to the west. Street improvements have been competed alor.3 Lucas Ranch Raad. E. Parking Calculations: t Number of Number of Type y Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Foota a sib O O DATE: September 23, 1987 $ z TO: Chairman and hers of the Planning Commission"' v i9n > FROM: Brad Buller, Ci:'y Planner Warehouse 10,000 BY: ° Chris Westma•n, Assistant Planner 20 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -31 - 10 10 proPosa o eve op a 1/4000 11 mu - ena industrial pa consisting of 3 buildings 142 —I T Tar' e r.) totaling 142,500 square feet on 7.29 acres in the General ' T7r Industrial Gisct, Subarea 5, located west of Lucas Ranch Road and north of 4th Street - APN: 210-071 -39, 57. 1. 40JECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requdsted: Issuance of a Negative Declaration B. SurroundinggLand Use and Zoning: HorT.nn Industrial,' ZUbarea 5 (General Industrial) South Industrials Subarea 5 (General Industrial) East - Vacant, Subarea 5 (General Industrial) West - Rail Spur, Subarea 5 (General Industrial) C. General Plan Designations: Project teGenera n• ustrial North - General Industrial South - General Industrial - East - General Industrial West - general Industrial D. Site Characteristics: The site is paved, has a steel beamed cZnstrucfian canopy, a trailer and chain link fencing. The site is being used for truck trailer storage. A rail easement exists to the west. Street improvements have been competed alor.3 Lucas Ranch Raad. E. Parking Calculations: ITEM'* '` Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Foota a Ratio Required Provided Office 6,000 11250 24 24 Manufacturing 52;207 1/500 104 104 Warehouse 10,000 1/1000 20 20 20,000 1/2000 10 10 44,230 1/4000 11 13 TOTAL 142 —I T Tar' e T69" ' T7r ITEM'* '` 0 PLANNING CO1* SSION STAFF] EPORT DR 87-31 :r Turner Develont Corporation September 23, 1987 /, Page 2-' it J 11. ANALYSIS: A. 'General: The project use is consistent with the General Plan and rne Industrial Specific Plan, Subarea S. and is compatible with other projects in the surrounding area. Upon approval of the Negative Declaration, the City Planner will grant final approval of the project based on ;ecow2ndat ons made by the Design and Technical Review Cormittees. S. Design Review Committee: The Committee (Chitiea, Kroutil) reviewed tie project on September 3, 1987 and forwarded it to the Planning Commission with the following recommendations: 1. Accent colv�rs should be limited to one for buildings "A" and "B" and'one for "C". 2. Surface treatment such as textures, reveals and possibly colors sltsuld be provided to building walls. 3. The office entry areas should have 4�,pnger architectural statements which would include height wind plane variation. 4. The plaza area should incorporate special hardseape treatmnt, such as trellis work, seating, trash receptacles and special landscape treatment with groundcover, shrubs, specimen size trees, and accent trees. S. Special landscape treatment should be provided at al-1 project entries through the use of accent trees and spodmer size trees. C. Env:,fiemental Assessment: Parts I and II of the Initial Study 'wave` en comp e e an no significant impacts have been found Elated to the construction of the proposed building. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and,ind ustrial Specific Plan. The building design and site plan, together with recommended conditions of approval are in compliance with the Industrial Specific Plan and all other applicable City Standards. Elk TIMM PLMJU' GCS y' -AFF REPORT DR tuO' W, 0 �b �- poent Gorporation-' Page 3 IV. P.'& TEO}; Staff,, recommends that the Planning Commission i slue a Regmw Declt:*,.,,�Jon for Development Review 87-3',, Resp"ulT4_-1ubm1teed, Bra City *Pnn&er Ba:cw:vc Attachments: Exhibit "P Location Map Exhibit, "B" Site Plan Exhibf�t *,Cw Elevations kv 1' IE IE 35 PC 8 . I m NORTH CrrY CF RANCHO CU(,-ANK-rrA KANNM MrW�.�j rXHW- SQUE, --t�6 n a.%4wK=C ENV RGFs EGEY WNS mr.fw . NOME �1. CF RANCTIO C_ ---- -� • 0 j -- C1 1' OF RANCHO CUG� '11QNGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 23, 1987 rl TO:- Chairman and Members of the Planning Corwission FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Enginee- BY: Barbara'Kraii, Assi.Aant Civil Engineer ) SUB1'CT: ENVIR0NMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 10941. TURNER D . 1 PME_T° - A sTa . v s on or .%29 acres o`f E,5 nto parce s in t e en ral Ir5ustr.ial Development District„ Subarea 5, located on the West side of Lucas, Ranch 'Road, north of 4th Street (APR 210- o71 -57 39) I. PROJECT ANU_SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Re ested: Approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map as shown on Exhibit "B" B. Parcel Sie: Parcel 1 1.62 Acres Parcel 2 - 1.85 Acres Parcel 3 - 3.52 Acres Total 7_79-Mcres C. Existing Zoning: General Industrial, Subarea 5 D. Surrounding Land Use: North - ex st ng Tncfustriai Building South - existing Industrial Building East - existing Industrial Building Hest - existing Indust -ial Building E. Surrounding General P'-,n and Ueveiopment Code 3psignations: North - General Incustrial 5u aka South - General Inddstrial Subarea 5 East Generel Industrial Subarea 5 West - General Industrial Subarea 5 'F. Site Characteristisst The site is vacant and slopes in a southeasterly direction. ITEM r, /h PLANN14G COMHUSSIQN STAFF REPORT } PM 1€1941 - TURNER DEvELOpMEgT Co. SEPTEMBER 23, 1987 PAGE 2 II. ANALYSIS: TNe purpose of this Parcel Map is to create 3 separate parcels for the development of the 'Industrial buildings beincj 4onsidered for approval on tonights agenda as DR-87-31. The Public street adjacent to the site is improoed with the exception of street lights,, drive approaches and street trees which are required- with the development a€ the parcels. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The applicant complAlted Part I of the Initial ti y. to �'on acted a field investigatiiin and completed Part II of the Initial - Study. No, adverse impacts upon the envirde are 111 Declaration is a proprt,ie..this project. Therefore, issuance or negative Declaration is ap�prot��- "sate. IV. COfRE5aPtlNOFACE * - �' K -As of Public Hearing have been sent to Sur rounding proper y dRii rs and p44ted in the Ut*lly Repox,t Newspaper. Posting at the site has 41so been ,completed. V. RtCdM lEKUATI(N: It is recommended that the Planning Con- dission Onsider ` ill— n—PUi- 1-0 elements of the Tentative Parcel Map. If after such consideration, the Camission can recommend approval, then the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. !t Respectfully submitted, Barvye R,. Hanson Senior Civil Engineer BkH:BK :dlw Attachments: Vfclnity Map Exhlbit `V) Tentative Map (Exhibit "B") Resolution and Recommended ConOtions of Approval D CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIVICONOA ENGIrWERI ING DIMIGN C17N OF RANCHO CtJC"ONGA rrEM.- -FVW-UL MAP I RESOLUTION NO. A' ;SOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RWLHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 10941 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 10941, submitted by, Turner Development Corporation, applicant, fslr the purpose of subdividing' =nto 3 Kparcels, the real property situated ihm t;ie City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, identified as APN(s) 210- 071 -39 and 40, located on the west side of Lucas Ranch Road, north of 4th Street; and WHEREAS, on September 23, 1967, the P.l, Ring Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above- describe.►,map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PL4- ,'4NINe COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1:5-tiat the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for proposed development. I' IV 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 10941 is hereby approved subject F —Me attached Standard Conditions app -_the following _Special Conditions: Special Conditietis 1. The ex -iting ovef head utilities (telecommunication and electrical) on the projFtt side of Lucas Ranch Road shall be undergro nded from the existing pore at the north project boundary to the existing pole located at the south project property line, prior to public improvements acceptance or occupancy of thE. first building on any parcel, whichever occurs first. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one -half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. C _� „ r i f , i RESOLUTION 1` PAGE 2 APPROVED -ants ADOPTEED THIS 23RD DAY OF SEPTEta'ER, 1987„ PLANNING COWISSION OF THE CITY OF RAttCHO CUCAMOFlGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, a rman ATTEST: Brad Buller puty cretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify thr-� the foregoing Resolution vas duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adoireed by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a- regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of September, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COIfiMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMISSTONERS: qP IM t� CITY OF RANCHO CUGAMONGA PART II - INITIAL STUDY ZM. RONMENTAL CHECKLIST \ rLLJ.:tlL :2:41 . eF A�` T.OG +ER: PROJECT: :PROJECT LOCATION. I. E?i51iR0i�NT�U, IMPACTS " 7 �M�r��✓- (Explanation if All "'Y88" and "maybe" answers are required on attached dhests). YES MAYBE NO 1. Sails and Geology. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes In geologic relationships? / b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or burial of the soil? c. Change in ,topography or ground surface contour intervals? - r d• The destruction, Covering or modification Of any unique /j geologic or physical features? •� A' Any potential increase In wind or water erosion �; � ~ of soils, sits conditona? affecting either on or off f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? h. An increase in the rsta of extraction and /or f use of any mineral resource? J 7. Hvdtzj.UX, Will the proposal have significant rlSult9' ice: Page a., Changes in YES X-ly%£ currents, or the course of direction Of flo:uing streams* rivers, or ephemeral stream channels? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? /r c. Alterations to the course waters? or flow of flood ` lT � d. Change is thl' .aznounC of surface grater in body of water ?`;, any _- Discharge into \µrfaee waters,', ._... `- or any alteration of S%4\face water quality? f. Alteration of gWkrdraater characteristics? 8• Change in - -xhe g�rstitp of Eroundcaters, either tbrtsugh eslrejjt additions or �y with - drawals, or thrq I *;'-- iVMftrfsrence aquifer? with ar �ptlitr? � tivantity� �. h. The reduction in the auaount of stater other- wise available for public water supplies? i. Exposure of people or pra;terty to water related hazards each as flooding or �-eiches? f 3. Air usli Will the proposal have sn fi results in: .�i_cant ! a. Constant or FQriodic air emissions from mobile or indirect 30Urcas? Stationary sources? b. Deterioration of ambient sir quality and/or interference with the attai.nm z of applicable air quality standards? C- Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or remperature? k. Biota Flora. Will the proposal have significant results In: a• Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, i or number of any species of plants? b• Reduction of the numbers of any uniqus, rare *: e13d_atiEetdYi eriwnaa,. �c `^ ?a ;e 31 YE uaY3E �O c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of C> plants into an area. Al d, Reduction in the potential for zgricultural ` production? Fauna. Will the proposal'have significant results ..� _.. ins a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or numbers of any species of animals b. Reduction of the numbers OZ any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? .� c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of animals into an area,;or result in a barrier to the migration or mo ement of animals? 4. ueteriorstion or removal of existing fish or wildlife hibitat? 5. Peculation. Will the pra,psal have significant _..._ results in: a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri bucion, density, diversity, gr growth rate of the human population of an area? *� b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? a 6. E?sio- Economic Factors. Will the proposal have. . significant results in: a. Change is Io�:al or regional socio- economic characteristics, r including acch6mic or commercial diversity, tax rate, and property values? b. Will project coats be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax payers or project users? 7. Land Use and planning Considerations. Will the Proposal have significant results in? a. A subscan►_ al alteration of the present or planned .land use of an area? 1% d... ._ b. A confli-at with an; :designations, objectives, Policies, �;_ adopted` lens of an entities? Y governmental c. An impact upon the qulaity Qr qua;ktity of existing consumptive or non - consumptive recreational opportunities? Pv. i'} , !1 _In Page TES �!AYBE 8. Transaortation. Will the proposal have significant results in: A- Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for new str(let construction? C. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? d. Subst ntial impact upon existing transporta- tion systems`d V- e. Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of people and /or goods? f. ' Alterations to or effects on present and s Votontial. water- borne, rail, mass transit or air traffid? g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 4. Cultural Issources. Will the proposal have -� significant results in: a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, paleontological, and /or / historical resources? / 10. Health. Safety„ and 2Puisance Factors. Will the proposal have significant results-ii- a' Creation of'any health hazard or potential health hazard? b. Exposure of peope to potential health hazards? C. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances in the event Of ..,M. accident? d. An increase in Ole number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? e. Increase in existing noise levels? f. Exposure of people to 'r potentially dangerous noise levels? S. The creation of ob!ectionable odors? �_ ✓� h. An increase in light or glare? r !1 _In 'age 5' F i YES Y4Y5c VO 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. The obstruction or degradation of any scetic v13ta or views? b. The creation of an as* site? sthetically, offensive f J c. A conflict with the objective of designated or potential titanic corridors? 12. utilities and Public Services, Will the proposal have a aignificanc need for systamg, acw or alterations to the following: a. Electric power? .00,. b. Natural or packaged gas? f c. Communications syst!MX ? _..M d. Water supply? e. Wastewater facilities? f. Flood control structures? e g, Solid waste facilities? k�. Fire protection" i. Police protections? '. Schools? ..._. J- k` Parks or other recreational facilities? r_ 1. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads and flood control facilitiea? f m. Other SOWrnmental services? 13. Enerey and Scarce Resources. Will *,hs prr basal have significant results _.._. _... in: a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of arxrgy? / c. An increase in the demand for development of a� new sources of energy? d. Are increase or perpetuation of the consumption of non=renewable foams of energy, vhun fea,sibla renewable sources of � tsv a_ 2-.41 ,.x I _" I/ � Page YES FAYBE e. Substantial depletion Of any nonrenewable or scarce uttural resource? 14. Manda Fingp aM Cs of Si lificange. a- Does the project have tb,,i t,otential to degrade the quality of the substantially reduce the habitat O'f fish or wildlife species, ,Cause a fish Or WIAlif"Papulatia, to drop below self xuzrs�fiinf levels, threaten to eliminate a Pla7"i cr�anima COURAuttity,-raduce the number or fiestrict the range of a rare or endangered' rla6t. or animal or Impor'-sut Qxxq sltx of the major California history Or Prehistory? b. Does the Project have the POtdntiAl, to ach'feve short-term, to the disadvantage of loaf -term, environmental goals? (A short -t*= impact on the environment- is one which occurs in a ^elatively brief, defdaitive period of time whip' long- term impacts will endure wall into'-aff future), c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, bur cumulatively considerable? 04mulatIvely considerable means that the incremental effects of an individual, project arm considerable when viewed in,-- nnaction with the effects of past projects, anci7'robable future projects) . ✓ d. Does th project bjiv& environmental effects which vikZ-cause, :substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or Ind!rect-ly? DISCUSSION OF ImIr-M—L EVALUATION (i.e., of &.fIrm&tiVg &nxw' -in 4VQVC questions plus a ;is cuss proposed %,ti$&tion *rS Co measures). 4_ .7( Pace . ✓4 I22, DET- .�f____� I:i� -- AT= On the basis of this initial evaluation: ' I find the prop,sad project COMM NOT have ; significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be rr. are d. p F I find that although the proposed projec, %could have a significant effect_on tha enviroroont, there'ui11 +;pt'b.e a igniftcant effect in tifi5 -'rase because the mitigation`measuras " llacribed an an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE f AEGL}1RP.TION WILL &E PPIPMED, I find tht proposed project W&Y ha,'rs a significant ff envirnment, and an ENvlp4. r LMpACT 4RT in r+squizedt on the Dates,= ���e�:_.� � A Signature'° Title 7- 11 El CITY OF RADTCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 23, 1987 TO: Chairman and Vembers of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City ,Planner BY: Greg Gage, Assistant Planner 1977 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 37-01 - CITY OF KAW-Ju Z. amen n o e 17 o e n c pa o e grta rn to the defini`i ,)n of State mandated recycling facilities and the criteria for design, location and opr:ration of such facilities, I. BACKGROUND: This item was continued from the August 26, 1987 ann ng Commission meeting to tonight's meeti,%q at the request of staff. The continuance was l "-equested to allow the City 5ttorney the opportunity to review the State legislation and regulations related to this item. After reviewing the provisions of the California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act (A(,s 2020), the City Attorney determined that new recycling facilities within Rant'ho Cucamonga would best be handled by the establishment of a uniform posit procedure for the placement of these facilities. II. ANALYSIS: In accordance with the attorne,Y's determination, a new per.n� process is proposed to prtivid4 for the review and establishment of recycling facilities within the parameters set by State law. The proposed permit procedure will allow for an administrative review and approval. Staff believes the most difficult issue with regards to AB 2020 is the retrofitting of existing centers. Beyond this first hurdle of retrofitting existing centers, future recycling facilities.will be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission in conjunction with the normal City review. and approval for the particular shopping center. The permit criteria would be uses: in either case in determining the appropriate plaremPrit and design of the recycling facility. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission consider the following definitions and criteria to be added to the Development Code, to clarify and set standards ftir compliance with the State mandated ncyclirg centers. Such definitions and procedures will ir:clude the infurmation as stated in the attached Resolution. Generally, the following issues are addressed: ITEM 0 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT OCA 87 -01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA S2ptein6u., 23, 1957 Page 2 De'1101tons-, Recycling - Convenience Zone: The area defined by the Public Resources Code, Division 12.1, Section 145D9.4. Reewling - Reverse Vending Machine: A mechanical device which accepts one or more types of empty beverage containers and issues a cash refund or a redeemable credit slip: a. A machine (or machines) which occupies less than 50 square feet and is placed u._wer the building canopy and adjacent to a business which sells beverages in r. b. A "machine (or machines) which a' lies more than 5o square feet but less than 342,,',',, �e feet, whictl is placed within a psrking area or other approved ,location of commervial canters. Recycyling - MoW a Unit: A kiosk, bin, or portable container which occupies less than 342 square feet and which is`-ijsed for the collection of redeemable beverage containers and other — cyclable material, which is ;operated by an attendant during hours of operation. Locational and Development Citeria: Recyclir.,g facilities which are mandated by the State shall be permitted within convenience zones (as defined in Section 17.02.14;1) in all commercialloffice districts, rrovided thnt the following criteria are met: a. Facilities not under the building canopy shall be set back at least 50 feet from my street frontage, as measured from curb face. b. All facilities shall be located in an area conveniently accessible to pedestrians and vehicles, and shall include safety provisions for separating- pedestrian and vehlc:;ar traffic such as special walkways, drive aisles, bollards and safety lighting. c. 411 facilities shall be designed in a manner consistent with the architecture and site plan of the surrounding commercial censer, including, but not limited to, erg -3qr materials, colors, and landscaping. riN d. Facilities which are not located andqr, the building AM canopy shat i have 3 loop; of perthanence. To accomplish ,this, the facility shall be developed as a permanent structure cr located within a structure architecturally consistent with the surro6ding commercial center such as an overhead trellis or arbor. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DCA 87 -01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 23, 1987 Page 3 e. All facilities which are operated by an attendant shall be: provided with access to on -site facilities such as restrooms and drinking fountains, f. Facilities which are not located under the building canopy or within a landscaped area shall require a continuous landscape planter at least three (3) feet in width (inside dimension) along the sides and rear of the facility. Access ramps shall be provided if rear loading /unloading of a facility is necessary. g. All recycling facilities,�5hali be maintained in good repair, and in a litter -free conditio;,k.,„ 14hen not attended and /or not in operation, provisi:ns for the deposit and storage of recyclable materials shall be made. All storage small be within an enclosed structure, - U. ill signage for any recycling facility. shall .ompiy with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Sign ti-Ainance and the approved <Unifom Sign Program for the -�onmercial center (where'applicable). AW III. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has completed Part I1 of the env ronmen c ec s and concluded that the proposed amendment would; „.not create significant adverse” environmental_ impacts. Therefore, staff recommends issuance of a negative Declaration. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in e a y eort newspaper. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission Td pt e attached Resolution recommending approval of the proposed amendment and issuance of a negative Declaration to the City Council. R ctfui , "i a�itted, Br B Ci ty lanner BB:GG:te Attachments: Fact Sheet for California Beverage Container Recycling and litter Reduction Act Questions and Answers on the "Bottle Bill" Exhibit 'A" - Typical Reverse Vending Facility Exhibit "B" - Typical Site Plan Resolution of Approvel D 11 CALIFORNIA. BEVERAGE CONTAINER RECYCLING; AND LITTER REDUCTION ACT FACT SHEET AH 2020, California's recently enacted Bottle Bill, estab- lished a new recycling program for beverage containers to "be administered by the Department of Conservation's Division of Recycling. The first of its kind in the nation, the program is intended to increase recycling of beverage containers and decrease litter. Thousands of recycling centers will open statewide for consumerf,to redeem their aluminum, plastic, glass and non - aluminum metal beverage contains. ,. o Convenience zones are established showing a one -half mile radius around every major supermarket which has $2 million or more in annual gross sales. Recycling centers must be operating within the 2,741 zones by January 1, 1988 or dealers within- ';hose zones will be fined $100 daily.. • Beginning September 1, 1987 beverage distributors must pay to the state one cent for each beverage container sold in California. Redeemable containers will carry the mark "California Redemption Value." !' l • Beginning OCTOBER 1, 1987, consumers who re Xrn their marked baverag c t )ers to cer fied recyclers will be paid onq' penny' r container, plMs any applicable scrap value and, bonus. • The prj�gram has a goal of 8o percent re:' cling. However, if a 65 percent rate is not reached `�or any specific container -type by January 1, 1990, the redemption value goes to 2 cents, and to 3 cents on January 1, 1993. • The unredeemed portion of the fund will be used to provide incentives foe!` recycling centers to serve unnerved areas, recycling bonuses for consumers, litter and recycling grants for community conservation corps programs, public education and promotion, and administrative costs. o Incentives are also provided for nonprofit organizations and curbside pickup programs operated by either nonprofit or municipal districts. 1-11 Vuestions & Answers 0 on the IIB6ttle Bill" The Beveragj. Container Recycling Act — A B 2020 — goes into effect oc- tober 1, 1,-27, Since it requires a number Zactions by cities to provide for the es- h,hni, of can'-enience centers for recycling around supermarkets, we're asked Leon Vann. Jr., Chief of the D& vision of Recycling of the California De. partment of Conservation to p. -ovide answers to a series of questions on the law and its implementation. By Leon Vann, Jr. Q What is tt -e history behind the • passage of AB 2020? A For 20 years -nvirenmen!alists • have tried to pass a traditional bottle bill in California. But, because those efforts have proven to be expensive for all parties involved, a coalition of industry and environmental representa- tives was formed to negotiate a compro- inise. An initiative, Proposition l I, which would have required a five -cent fea deposit by the evoters by a e containers, margin 01755.9 to 44.1 in 1980. All of the players had their own reasons for On a tradi- tional bottle bill. Grocers did not want to take the containers bank in their stores, recyclers did not wt,pt to lose business to the grocers, the beverage in- dustry did not want the cost of their products to increase dramatically, and environmentalists wanted litter reduced. Q So what wa;: the result of this • process? A These interested parties worked o with the Legislature through long negotiations and came up with a coinvomise everyone could live with. Lawmakers took a look at the problems other states with traditional bottle bills were having. At the same time, they lis- tened to the industries involved and the environmentalists and came up with AB 2020, passed by the Legislature and signed into law in September, 1986. Ps You study it, you'll see the bill is veky entrepreneurial and is a free market ap- proach to recycling. It provides a mini- mum redemption vrlue forconsumers as well as convenient recycling opportuni- ties. It does not require stores to take back the containers. The bill also pro- vides that unredeemed funds be used for bonus incentives, public education and Promotion of recycling as well as for California Conservation Corp grants for litter cleanup. fj How does the California Bev- y erage Container Recycling 2nd-Litter Reduction Act work?.._ The bill creates a beverage con- s tainer recycling program for California to be administered by the State Department of Conservation's Di- vision of Recycling. The act establishes a network of recycling centers where four different beverage container types -- glass, alumim'm, plastic and non -alu- minum metal —will be redeemed. Cov- ered beverages include beer and other malt beverages, carbonated mineral and soda waters and similar carbonated soft drinks. Because the legislators believed re- cycling had to be convenient to work, the law requires recycling centers to be set ap withit one -half mile of any super- market that conducts $2 million a year or more in annual gross sales. So, the bill mandated the Department of Con- servation to designate those half -mile areas as "convenience zones" through- Out the state by January I, 1987, a dead- line the department has met. Consumers may then conveniently redeem their containers for cash at a recycling or re- demption center established within one of the 2,743 convenience zones„ A pro- vision ofthe bill allays ;he ,cpartment to grant zone exemptions in up to 10 per- cent of the half -mile redemption regions established throughout the state, but Only if it has been determined there 4.,t adcgpatll rcMliag opportunit4 s, s44h zones. And. it is up to local governments to request the exemption. Starting September 1. 1957, distrib- nwrs will pay a penny per container into a special state recycling find. Con- sumers who recycle will riiceive the penny redemption value pluf applicable uonuses starting October Vuhen they return their redeemable cv.itainers to a certified recycling center. Dealers who do not have recycling or redemption lo- cations within their convenience zones on or before January 1. 1985. must either redeem all fourcontaine! types in theirstores or pay a fine of S 100 perday. Since increased recycling and de- creased litter are the goals of the new law, very specific requirements were set in the bill by the legislature. By January 1, 1990, if the recycling rate does not reach 65 pert ^^t, the redemption value will be increased to two cents. !f by Jan- uary 1. 1993, the rate still is not 65 per- cent, the redemption value would . increase to three cents. At the pemty level, the measure will bring in approximately S100 million a year. Fundsremaininein the account be- caese of unre0eemed containers a ill go to a *'Redemption Bonus A:coant." Such funds will be used to establish re- demption centers in unserved areas, to provide recycling and litter abatement grants to Community Conservation Corps, as bonuses to consumers, and to provide information, education and prc- motion of recycling as well as to cover administrative costs. Q What opportunities exist for s wcal governments under this A This bill gives local governments • a real incentive and opportunity to begin curbside programs which can henefit them with the growing problem of diminishing landfill space. A Febru- ary report by the California Waste titan• agement Board states that landfills in Sacramento and 19 other counties, which now accept more than 70 percent of the state's trash, will be full by 1996. &-cording to the report, Californians toss out about 37 million tons of garbage a day. At thisraw, the report warns, the state will be out of landfill space by the year 2001, if no more - capacity is per- mitted. Since residents in local com- rnunities are mom and more reluctant to allow their local officials to approve landfills, many cities are seeking alter- native ways to trteet their refuse dispos- a1e rwMteme Rna.a i;t ....., t -..._ is an obvious st.+ution that could reduce the materials sent to landfills signifi- cantf,. Successful implementation of AB 2U20 has the potential to postpone the need for additional landfill sites as wbii as to stabilize rapidly if re- fuse collection and waste di.t?osal costs. Q How can curbside recycling • programs help? A Linder.4B 2020. curbside pro- * =_rams can be more cost effi- cient. Local governments should not discount the idea of implementing a curbside recycling program in their areas. if such programs do not already exist. Acurbsideprogram inconjunction with buyback and drop -off centers has proven to be the most effective means of removing materials from the waste stream. A multi- material curbside pro- gram. one that collects several types of recyclables. provides the most conven- ience to consumers. Zoning ordinances in some • cities do not allow recycling cen ors. How is the Department han- dling that problem? Convenience was a major issue • for legislators when they were drafting this bill. That's why they called for recycling locations within one -half mile of supermarkets, The legislature also was aware that zoning ordinances could get in the way of providing con- venience, so they adopted language that strongly encourages local governments to allow recycling facilities in conven- fence zones. The Act says local agencies shall nor deny a permit for a mobile cen- ter or re ,rse vending machine. whose Operator is certified or has applied for ,certification, on a property zoned for commercial or industrial uses within a convenience zone and with the permis- sion of the property owner. It further says that to deny the permit under these circumstances. the local agency must make specific findings that the opera- tion will be detrimental to the public health, safety and well being. The law goes on to say that local agencies can make reasonable rules and regulations governing the permit so long as their rules do not preclude service to the con- venience zone. This does not mean the state is preempting local authority. The department recognizes that it is totally up to local governments to site recycling facilities. But, we are working closely with local jurisdictions to, encourage them to help make this program a How do « e find out mgr at • 4B 2020 and its impav on loca governments: A The Division ofRecvcling will • present regional workshops on curbside programs and a model zoning ordinance, prepared in conjunction with the League of California Cities and the County Supervisors Association of Cal- ifornia, this summer. For information. contact Susan Eddy at (916) 323 -3508 or call the Drpartme'nt's toll -free Hotline at 1-800-642-5669. Q What other benefits does this • bill create for cities? A Under AB 2020. grant funds are • available to cities and counties to set up local Community Conservation Corps projects wh:�h can assist munic- ipalities in recycling and litter abate- ment activities. Using the Conservation Corps or local recycling and litter proj- ects could be a real savinfis to cities. (� What specific issues ir%ould ``��• cities be considering right A nQyr, Ah Zoning and zoning ordi s • are the major issues for local governments right now. Cities need to evaluate how their current permitting process fits or doesn't fit with the re- quirements of AB 2020.._lanv cities such as San Jose. Sunnyvale and Los Angeles and Santa Cruz County. already have begun preparing amendments to their zoning ordinances. Cities can con- tact our division for copies of the model zoning ordinance which has the goal of streamlining the administrative process wherever possible and to help develop local regulations appropriate ,3 different types of recycling facilities. An "over the counter" type permit process for smaller operations would simplify the issue for both the local jurisdiction and the recycler. Local jurisdictions should be looking at the model ordinance, which encour- ages the use of common terms. stan- dards and practices, and prepare for the rush from recyclers who will be appear- ing at your counters soon now that we've begun taking applications for ce tion. The model ordinance was - oped from surveys of city and county Planners and existing recycling centers to determine their experiences and con- cerns, and after looking at zoning poli- cies (bat have been developed by several cities which are familiar with recycling operations. Ll Questions & Answers fcanui,tuedl Cities also should consider whether the% %want to ask for exemptions, if they heLe%e theu..'i:.vside or other recycling programs meet the law's regtrements. Keep in mind though that we're allowed onh a total of 10 percent exemptions-- - that. 274 zones. not ;ities. For exam- ple. t%e beli--c-insrto maybe asking for exemptions — there are 48 zones in that cit. w that would mean nearly one -fifth of err 10 percent exemptions'could go to 1-resno. Local gov..rnments should also know th6t an exemption simply means the law no longer will require :c- cycling centers within each convenierce zone. but it does not preclude the de- partment from certifying r.-cyclers who apply for that city, ii the recycler mee,s " all of the other requirements for certi- fication. Several cities and counties have organized local meetings which include retailers, recyclers, planning commis- sioners and their staffs, t^ discuss ways to meet the requirements of the law. We're found these types of meetings provide excellent opportunities to ex- chance information and address siting issues. Some local agencies have de- MANAGEMENT CONSULTING FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS Arthur Young. with one of the largest government consulting, practices in California. has a statf of specialized consultants dedicated to serving local government organizations. Our consultants are results -oriented. government services prolessonws. v%ith extensive expenen fze to alt areas of . ,. ^.c.ca, cc r ^ :, ano special drsmct operations SL---- ' c areas r rExpertrse Include • F Marc a. A�-ais s and Planing • :^t-,c'a ::Qr Satems Evaluation Design and installation . rvtanagertent Auwts of Organizations and Procedures t-,,, -nan Resources Swdres. nctuding Classification and 0_- roensa -on Plans For rro e -rforn-,ation on how we can help you. call any of our Government Consulting leaders: Nadine Levin Joe Bill San Franr. :sco Sacramento k,15) 951 -3227 (916) 443.6756 Bob Tyre Los Angeles t213) 977.3390 ,.• ""'` Larry Seigel �•" . j�+a Q x/ ` Orange County X"Itt,00 te-` '� G"kl"' (714) 850 -9409 P ��n�rtC�gplll�� We take business personalty 2- cided to adopr their conditions on rcc} - cling centers as part of council policy rather than part of their zoning ordi- nances. because it's so much easier to change council l -n�v than to re -amend a zoning ordinance. ')f course. as wr said earlier, our:vaff is available to pro. vide technical ass ..ance and to attend meetings. if local governments reur,n it, and we will Lave the regional shops .on curbside programs and the model zoning ordinance in July and August. Q What role does the state play • inallofthis? A For our division it has meant • starting from scratch — hiring staff, renting office space. finding fur- niture and equipment and developing administrative procedures. We've identified and mapped the 2,743 con- venience zoues and made those maps available to the public. Emerpricy reg- ulations gowaning container labeling. certification. accounting and reporting requirements. and processing fees have been or are being written. As we said earlier. we are developing the model zoning ordinance, and a marketing and promotion plan is being formulated %with input from the industries involved. We've hzld public hearings and meet- ings with our advisory committee, at- tended workshops and co- sponsored conferences and meetings of local gov- erriments to explain and fashion the im- plementation of AB 2020. As we near our program kick-off date of October 1, we expect the need for more workshops and meetings with local officials %will in- crem so the pressure on us will con- tinue even beyond the October kick -off date. What benefits are there for the consumer? AConvenience will be the nam im- • mediate benefit for consumers under the new law. A minimum of 1.700 recycling locations will be added by pri- vate industry statewide where con- sumers may conveniently redeem their containers for cash. As theprogram ma- lures and we reach our recycling goats. consumers also will benefit from stable garbage collection fees and from the re- ductionof beverage containers now end- ing up in landfills which are rapidly disappearing. Wthe long run, of course, we'll all see the benefits because we'll be saving our natural resources which, as we have begun to realize, are in lim- ited sunt3ty. IR 0 i AM w KA-1 LL--j 0 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAFMONGA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 87 -01 ADDING SECTION 17.04.080 TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOPGA PERTAINING TO STATE MANDATED RECYCLING CENTERS WITHIN COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE ZONES WHEREAS, o` the 23*24 day off, September, 1987, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised pblic hedging pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds it necessary to clarify and revise the Developmnt Code regulations pertaining to State mandated recyt;ling centers. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission finds thatl)'the proposed ev17'- 1e'opment Code Amendment 87 -01 is an i"lementartion of the G.Meral Plan goals and policies and that the General Plan Environmental impact7Report adequately covers any potential significant �dvers+e impacts. Further, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or,'supplemental environmental impact report is required pursuant to Division 13, Chapter 6, Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code. Specifically, the Planning Commission finds: A. No substantial changes are proposed in any goals or policies which would require major revisions to the EIR. B. No substantial changes have occurred with r'e'spect to the circumstances under which the proj.�t is being undertaken. C. No new information on the project has become available. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this proj&-T'NTMnot create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on September 23, 1987. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 55850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Development Code Amendment 87 -01, and approval of the Ordinance Section 17.04.080 attached hereto marked as "Exhibit 9 and incorporated herein by this referent4. Ire P NINE COWISSIi1B�: ° IwVT iiN NO. DC $7-01 - CITY 4P T#0 . UCAMONGA Se, tuber 23, 1987 Fag�� 2 2. That a Certified Copy of tkls Resolution and related material Wsreby adopted by the Aianning Co!mnission shall be forwardtd to the City Council, 3. 7he Plwai %g U msission ht•eby rccommends that the City Council approve and adapt Development :Code Amendment 87-01 as s- tated herein. APPROVED AND ADOPTtD WS 23RD DAY OF StkMR, 19W,,, PLANNING COW1,gION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO C lGi3 KA BY: Larry T. MUM, Chairman ATTEST: ra Muller, Deputy SecFMry 1 I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Coswt of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, 'n�i1t adopted by the planning Commission of the City of Rancho fucamonga, at a regular meting of the Planning Commission held on the n d day' i :f September, 1987, by the fol i owi ng vote -to -wit: AYr?S: COMISSIONERS: NOES: COMAISSIONE S: ABSENT: COWISISIONERSt 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ST"F REPORT f�. U s DATE: Septemb 3r 23, 1987' 1977 TO: Chairman and members of the planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City planner BY: Scott ligtrphy, Associate planner SUBJECT: ENYIR IMENTAi. ASSES90f AND TENTATIVE TRRGT 13727 ,,- en a son s ,ag- a fm o s on3 acres of land in the Low Residential Dist -ict raGelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of Carne =ia, Street and Highland Avenue - AM ' 2oi- Zia -i1. Staff is in receipt of a letter from tie applicant requesting that this item be continued for an additional tw,,.weeks. Therefore, staff recommends that the`public hearing be contit��O to October 14, 2987. F.. Res lly su ted, dd B Ci ne BB: SM:vc Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant - i September 16, 19a7 -= `l City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department Planning Division 9320 Baseline Rd Suite C Rancho Cucamonqa, Ca. 91730 rA Subject; Tract 13727 k Dear Sirsz Due to the necessity of my neighbor having to revue his gradirut,� r plan for Tract 12820, as a result of the Design Review Committs3 meeting concerninci Jasper SW --`I respectfully request "that my meetinq with t Planning Commission be continued to .coincide wir�h Tract 12 b's meeting with the Planning Commission. very GY y s, Eric Jansse ` 0 CITY OF R,ANCI fO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 23, 1987 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning �;owmission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Bruce Cook, Associa'a Planner C'1�3CAyo i 1 � % r rz -� O O > Q a 1977 SUBJECT: ERVITRONMENTAL AS;:-'7rENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 87 -04A - JOE 01 10RIOf11C=fW1TWW - A m*jest ta _amen e Land Se ap o e ..General '-' ' Plan from J.( Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) to �xmercial for approximately three acres of land, located ,:,i the cast side of Milliken Avenue, north of Highland Avenup APN 225 - 141' -29. EWINONMEkTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT- 07-02 = -"JOE-R1 IO n application o amen a Development—al—sfrIct Map from Caryn Planned Community to Neighborhood Commercial for approxial-itely three acres of land;, located on the east side of Milliken Avenue, north o. Highland Avenue - APN 225 - 141 -29. I. ABSTRACT: The Caryn Company has submitted a request to amend the "enera Plan Land Use Map from Low Residential to Commercial and to amend the Development Districts Map from Caryn Planned. Community to Neighborhood Commercial. The involved acreage is the southerly 3 acres of a 7.94 acre jarcel located on the east side of Milliken Avenue at Highland, just north of the planned Foothill r'reeway right -of -way. Staff's analysis of the site has found inconsistencies of the project with various policies of the General Plan. Staff has also determined the potential for adverse environmental impacts resulting from the project both in terms of disruption of traffic flow due to limited access potential to the site, and of social /economic impacts resulting from the o�tersupply of commercially zoned property beyond the market need. ;staff has provided Resolutions of Denial for this project t'or the Commission's review and consideration. II. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: 1 A. Action Requested: Amend the General Plan from Low Residential =Npegatfl!e T amend the 2evelopment District Map from Caryn munity to Neigh�a-i�ood Commercial, and issuance of a claration. ITEM PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 87- G4A/DDA 87 -02 - 01 1ORIO /CARYN September 23, 1987 Page 2 B. location: East siQe of Milliken Avenue, approximately 450' north of HighianJ. C. Parcel Size: Southerly 3 acres of 7.94 acre parcel. D. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North vacant lana propose for suture church site and Single Family Residential beyond; Caryn Planned Community. Soutar Highland Avenue /future Foothill Freeway Corridor and vacant beyond; Medium -Hig Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) within the, Victoria Planned Community. East - Single Family Residential- Caryn Planned Community. West - Vacant; Medium Residentl ai (8-14 dwellfflT units per acre). This site is proposed to be changed to Low - Medium Resida'ttial with GPA 87- 04C /DDA 87 -07. E. General Plan Designations: - NoU - ow es, en a (2 -4 dweil�-ng units per acre). South - Foothill Freeway and Medium -High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) b =z?nd. East - Low Residential (2 -4 dwallins -units per acre). West - Flood Control and high school. Tat-`s site is proposed for amendment to Low - Medium itesidential (4-8 duelling units per acre) with GPA 87 -04c. F. Site Cho cter tf lh a - ,i c , #used of alluvia'_- fart eposi a, is covR- R-with annual weeds and grasses, and slopes in a southerly direction at approximately a 4-1/22 grade. The site is primarily vacan' except for an existing .alephone snitching station located at the sjutheast corner of the .site, III. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staf F has conducted a preliminary hvironmen a ''issessmren nitial Study per the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and has determined that this project could result in significant adverse effects for the both the impacts of the traffic: circulation system, and to social /economic impacts resulting from the over supply of commercially zoned property beyond the market need. Staff would recommend that further information be; provided as Iv.dicated in the Initial Study prior to making a finding of no significcnt impact and c^rvifying a r-,,itivn Declaration. IV. GENERAL PLP&'AMENDMENT ANALYSIS: The project site incorporates e southerly tee_ acres of an 8 -acre parcel that is Aft surrounded to the north and east b, the Caryn Planned Community. The nortl ,rly 5 acres is planned for future development as a cb;rch site. The project site is bordered to the West by Milliken Avettue and to the south by Highland Avenue. The planned Foothill P7 `� PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 87- 04A/DDA 87 -02 - DI IORTO /CARYN September 23, 1987 Page 3 Freeway directly abutts the project site along the prcgerty's southerly perimeter. Milliken Avenue is proposed as a on /off raga for the future freeway. In the analysis of arts proposal, staff has identified four specific issues. They 1 nclurle Land Use, the appropriateness of the site for a Commercial dens §50lion; Access, ingress /egress issues related to site specific criteria; xT,C ee, to determine the economic :Feasibility of a Commercial use; and Parcel Size, to determine If the parcel is of sufficient size to suppor a v able Coamercial use. Land Use - The request to re- designate the site as Commercial. The Gen ral Flan identifies and provides pir,Aeters for four C=;-ercial Gard Use categories, i.e., Neightf ;rhood Commercial, General Commercial, Community Commercial, and Regional Coa+zercial. Community and Regional Commercial designations ary both not appropriate for this site as either designation is intended for a larger scale development that would be possible on this three acme parcel. General Commercial is intended for a broad Mange of commercial activities and may be applicable for this site in terms of Freeway related commercial uses. Freeway related commercial centers would incorporate commercial uses that would primarily be intenZad to serve the needs of the motoring public. This type of use, however, would not be desirable at this location because of the limited access potential of the site. The project site is located on the east .side of Milliken Avenue, approximately 450' north of Highland Avenue. Milliken Avenue is designated as an arterial and is designed with a center median island. The future Foothill - Freeway right -of -way abuts the project site at its southerly permiter. Milliken Avenue will be an access point to the freeway and will be a signalized intersection. To accommodate these pnysical constrains, the proposed access to the site is designed with a median break on Milliken about 260' from the planned illiken /Foothill Freeway intersection. This configuration would make a left -turn out of the project site onto Milliken potentially very difficult and hazardous. In light of this, it would not be desirol,m to permit a freeway related center on this site that would encourage exiting traffic to turn left as motorists attempt to re -enter the freeway. Neighborhood Coamercial uses include both neighbar1hood shopping centers and convenience commercial clusters. The.. !General Plan intends for neighborhood shopping centers to be 5 -15 acres in size and to serve a market area of roughly 10,000 residents. The size of the project site, i,e., 3 acres, is significantly smaller than the established criteria and therefore, a neighborhood shopping <, PLANNING COWISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 87- 04A/DDA 87 -02 - DI IORIO /CARYA September 23, 1987 Page 4 center would not be an appropriate land use for this site. Convenience Commercial clusters are intended to provide small, localized retail and /or service businesses that provide goods and merchandise to immediate surrounding land uses. The intended function of a Convenience Comwrcial center would be to provide a convenlert place to buy gr- oceries for the i:.ediate neighborhood. fie General Plan estal?,fishes as a primary performance criteria that the conv7jence commercial clusters be, easily accessible by either bicyclihb-or walking for the intended users. The primary users of the site would be residents of The Caryn Plan'ted Community. Tha project site is located on the' fringe of the Planned Community, is not linked to the Planned Community's trail sys�em to promote bicycle and /or pedestrian use to the center, and does not appear to be in conformance with the General Plan criteria for convenience commercial, clusters. Access - The project site has approximately 250 feet of frontage on XMiken Avenue. Milliken Avenue is classified as an arterial, and is designed with a, center median. directly south of the site will be the Milliken on /9ff ramp for the future Foothill Freeway. The freeway access points will be a signalized intersection with Milliken Avenue, These phvsical constraints pose a severely limited access potential for the property. The applicant, at the request of staff, has prepared a preliminary circulation plan addressing the issue of how the site is to be accessed (see Exhibit "D "). The proposed access design shows a median break on Milliken Avenue'at the driveway to the site. This median break is about 240 fee` from the Milliken /Foothill Freeway intersection. This design is contrary to the General Plan policy of limiting median breaks on Milliken Avenue to 1/4 mile spacings, and, per the City, Traffic Engineer,' would not be permitted. Also, there is sme question as to if a median break at this location would disrupt the effective flow of traffic on Milliken. A traffic study wa- submitted to address this issue. The City Traffic Engine(, has indicated that the submitted traffic study has not substantiated that the submitted design can work,. The alternative access design would be no median break on Milliken with a single right - turn -in and right -turn -out driveway. This would be highly undesirablt because southbound traffic on Milliken would be unable to make a left -turn into the project site. ping that the primary aser of the center would be residents of - The Caryn Planned Community who would be approaching -the site frog, southbound Milliken, this would be an infeasible site design alternative. 0 'PLANNING :COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA- 87- 04A/DUA 87 -02 - DI IORIO /CARYN Septeimber 23, 1987 Pdge,.,5 Need - The GenEwal Plan directs that Neighborhood Commercial uses s ou d be located and established as determined by need. There is a planned 10 -acre neighborhood shopping center located at the southwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Highland Avenue within the Victoria Pianped Community. This planned commercial development would provide the same types of goods and services to be provided by the project site.- Staff has raised the issue of whether there is sufficient consumer demand to support two commercial centers located in the same immediate vicinity to serve the same local market area. The market information presented by the -'cant/,/ did not significa t:,�iaence�totsubstantia eicth+eoexistence of = sufficienn corsuwer deio,,i to support two commercial centers. Parcel Size the project site is 3 acres. Rased on this area, 111-e—TOMT7easable building area that could be expected would be about 30,030 square feet. Staff has raised. the ;issue of whether,-, the site is large enough to provide enough leasable square footagq� to support a viable commercial center, The market information, presented by the applicant di;d not offer any significant evioenee +l to substantiate the existence of sufficient leasable building! space to support a viable commercial center. V. DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT ANALYSIS: State law requires that e eve opmen s r c s, a " -- on ng Ordiance, be consistent with the,-General Plan (Section '65860, Government Code). If findings canner ,Z made to wa,rranl, a General Plan Amendment of the sita to a Commerical Land Use Designation, similar findings should also be made regarding the proposed Development District Amendment of the site-:,to a Commercial Zoning District to maintain this requirement of consistency. It should also be noted there is an irr,,onsistency in .the project request between the proposed General Fran and Development Districts Designation. The proposed General Plan Designation is to "Commercial ", the corresponding Development Dist -ict should be General Commercia'. Likewise,- the proposed Development District�nr"Fni-'is'"W� 7ghborhood Commercial", the corresponding General Plan Designation would be Neighborhood Commercial. VI. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order for the Planning Commission to recomraen approve of this project, they must find the folxowirig: 1. That this Project is consistent with the land use policies of the General Plan. 2. That this project would 'be in the best interest of the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. r A: PLANNING COMMIS'10ll STAFF KPORT GPA 8F -00101 W-,02 - D?' IORIO /CARYN September 2S", '1987 Page 6 3. That this project would not result in any significaq't adverse impacts to persons and property i : thi immediate 4'Cinity of� the project site. VII> CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Daily Report newspaper as a hearing item, public all property owners w n feet of the pr, oject site were sent direct mail public hearing p. natives, and the property. posted with a 41 x 8` large eo:ificatlow sign Per the City supplemental noticing requirements. VIII. RECOttENDATION: Staff recommends ghat the Planning Commission` To ward" ogre City Council a Resahtion recommending the denial of this project for the reasons stated in the Resolutions. If the Commission concurs, 'hen adoption of` the attached Resolutions would be appropriate. Res tfull fitted, G r ` Bra la ull Cit Planner E BB:BC:ko Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Nap Exhibit "B" - Existing Land Use Exhibit "C" - 'Existing General Pian /Zoning Exhibit "D" - Access Alan fl Applicant's Statement of Justificotion Resolution of Denial (GPA) )' Resolution of Denial (DDA) BANYAN ST; , CARYN P.C. w ` LM v F C p L (5,500 11,000Sq.ft. LOTS) L p (4,000 — 10,0O0sq.ft. LOTS) W r� ^�' 6GT ftZorim _ Y F FUTURE FOOTHILL_ FREEWAY ' l HIGHLAND AVE. LCD Lill VC M L _ VICTORIA z LU VICTORIA CITY OF IT�i: •�� RANCHO CUC,AIVIaN TITLE: PLANNM DIVISK)N E: -, iiBrI'- _scALE_— CITY OF RANCHO CucAmoNTGA RANNING DIVEM 40 1 * I E .1 a "K d 1144 AC I I iA CITY OF rrEM- RANCHO RIB. CUCAMONGA MANNING , B� i T(f ':` �is�twt► +moral Plats •iN _ D «valopmont Districts •••er ••ors q •••r• •zrili' S�`.. �' r r i•• Y r• r � � :rrr•rrr• ' - •' r • • e • ••ri '" ® .•� s. s : r _ • 1i talMR{ S� t� f It;ti 3 MILLIKEN BANYAN HIGHLAND CITY 0- ITEM: RANCH CUCAiVI+aNGA TITLE: [ PLANNING DIVISION EXHII[T =_4_sCALE= ++ BANYAN r • r+ • rr•ra+ r. •••er ••ors q •••r• •zrili' S�`.. �' r r i•• Y r• r � � :rrr•rrr• ' - •' r • • e • ••ri '" ® .•� s. s : r _ • 1i talMR{ S� t� f It;ti 3 MILLIKEN BANYAN HIGHLAND CITY 0- ITEM: RANCH CUCAiVI+aNGA TITLE: [ PLANNING DIVISION EXHII[T =_4_sCALE= El i 1 I U ,A9WeW4r -- CITY OF RANCHO_�,�UC,A,IMONUA TrME. A46 MaN SCALE- EXHIUr. ------------ F W Land Plan 1 Design -Group Manning • Urban Design Landscape Architecture Aujidst 26, 1987 j Mr. Otto XToutil Deputy City Planner City of Rancho Cucasong Planning Division 9320 Bas"a Road# Unit C Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Dear Otero: In raspouse to iters in yaur letter dated July 30, 1987, we have provided the following information needed,, for complotiuS GFA 87-414A Application: It*& 1: Supplemental notice — sign has been posted on site as per City requirentants., Item 2: Please find attached the legal description 6t--proposed 3AC Commercial parcel separate from the church parcel. Item 3: Please find attached 3001 radius map based on entire legal Parcel and revised sailing list. Item 4: a) A 3 acre commi;Fcial-Ate is a viable and desirable use at the norther t corner of Milliken and Highland Avenue, A 3, acre parcel in sw',ted for approie' ►ely 26,006 to 30000 square feet of",sio" lea"abU-,misa. This'' , particular site ;&di Ve suited to a small convenience market type use plus support uses an described i=-?-he City of Rancho Cucamonga zeighborhood commercial developaiant regulatijuej. b) Present: with the near completion 0Z Vinta *a RiShlands community. Approximately 875 hQmi�6i'vin be in place. Using a conventiomi strjndard�fl acre of commercial per 1,006 population this 3 acres of cON1WrC1&l is almost fully justified qty t,te Vintage Highlar-'s site. Future: given that future residest,,.Aj communities will be developed in,7the ;tnediate src\ the proposed 3 acres of commercial is fully * 4ustifto serve the demand SrATSMENT OF JUSTIFICATION City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division August 26' ' 1987 Page 2 c) The proposed commercial use at the southwest corn-ir of the freeway intem7unRe will be self-serving to the Victoria Community south of Highland Aveuue asking the proposild 3acre commArcial site viable for serving comwmitims north of Highland Avezwe. Item 5: The attached traffic impact study by Barton-Auchman Associates, Inc- for PrOPertlex at Milliken and Highland is bas*4 on commercial too for " subject adta'at the northeast corner of Killikec and Highland. This report states that Milliken Avenue cun adequately bandle projected traftic volumes with or without proposed poothill preeway. Item 6: The proposed 3 acre commercial site is border i I ',-I on the west by. Milliken Avenue, to the mouth by proy' "d freeway off-rampV to the North by proposed cburch/sc��*l site and to the FAst fiy Vintage Highlands residential. development. The priapry secess- point to the site from Milliken A*/erue is located', * 260',-,:�ortJL_af_A*� proposed freeway off-ramr,,, - A median rreak a��"ft`ii=_ -lane in provided to al?-)w access to the site for south bound traffic an Milliken Avenue. A secondary access to the site in achieved by utilizing a:,,cess from the adjacent parcel to the north. Item 7: Commercial development designation for said parcel will be 11neighborhood commericial" Item 8: The list of hazardous waste sit�4 prepared by the State of California Officia bf Planning and Research originally scheduled for August 15, 1987 submittal will be delayed- until Saptember 2nd at which time a signed 3tatement will be submitted to the City. Please feel fi,-,a to call should you have any questions. truly y urs, sl i Principal /' REASONS MR DEVELOPHENT Given the proximity within the city and its orientation to waior streets and the future freeKy, 'this site is an excellent location to meet city resident needs for commercial uses. _3 G K' J i RESOLUTION N©. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO 0CAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RCCOMMEKDIN: DENIAL. 'OF A RE4Zcs.; TO AMEND THE LAND USE MAP 07 TILE GENERAL PLAN, GFA 87 -04A, h'ROM LOW DENSM RESIDFNTIr+L (2 -4 DU/AC) TO C"ERCIAL FCA THE SOUTHERLY 3 ACRES OF A 7.94 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED Ok- 'fV.E EAST SIDE OF MILLIKEN AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 450 FEET NORTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE, RANNO CUCAMOPAA, CALIF6.01.A, AND MAKE FINDINHS IN S'T"ORT THEREOF - A. Recitals. ti) The Caryn Company has filed an application for the General Plan Amendment No. 87 -N4A as de .,cribed in the Title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Pian Amendment request is referred to a Tn(. Application. (ii) OR Septianber 23, 1987, the Planning Commission of -the City of Rancho Cucam:anga c(,ndtn;ted a duly noticed public hearing on The Application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) .A)l legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution f- have occurred. P,. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the P).anning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as fol'ows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds "hat all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are trose and co-rect. 2. Based uG m substantial evil ,,;e presented ,.v this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on September 23, 1987, including wr4tten and oral staff reports, together with public 'vestimony, this Co.m mi_;lon hereby specifically finds as follat.�s: (a) The Application applies to the southerly 3 acres of a 7.54 acre parcel of lard basically rectangular it configuration, located on the east side of Mili{llen Avenue, approximately 450' north of Highland Avenge. Said property is curren+ly designated as Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) on the Land Use Map of the Grl ra Plan and is subztar2ially vacant land except for an existing telephone switchind facility located at the southeast corner of the parcel; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low R_sidential (2 -4 du /ac) on the Land Use Map of 're General Plan and consists of vacant land for futdre development as a church site (the northerly 5 acres of 'he subject site) and as existing Single Family Residential (The Caryp Planned Cotamunity), the property to the souva of the subject site is Je3tanated Foothill F�eway Corridor and Medium -Nigh PLANNING COWISSIUW RESOL UT' 3N NO. GPA 87 -04A - DI IORIO September 23, 1987 Page 2 Residential (14-24 du /ac) bay and on the land Use Map of the General Plan is presently vacart, unimproved land and an existing 2 -lane State highway, the property to the east is designated Low Residential (2 -4 du/ac) on the Land Use Map of the General Plar, and consists of Single Family Residential (fie Caryn Planned Comwnity), and the property to the west is designated future ;sigh school and Flood Control on the Land use Map of the General Plan (a proposed aFendment to the site to Low- Medium Residential has been requested per GPA 87- 04C) and is presently vacant, unimproved land; and of the GeneralcPlanrnfr a Low Residenttial (2-4 du/ac) to Commerciald for the southerly 3 acres of the 7:.94 ac -: parcel; and (d) The ApO ication mould not be cons:stpat with the Land Use Eiei, -nt of the General Plan, could potentially result in signi sicaait adverse impacts to persons and property in the immediate vicinitiy of :he subject site, and would not be in the best interests of the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as fallow;: (ij The General Plan esiaW,� " 1, performance criteria in terms of purpose, intent, parcel size, leas' building area and marked service area for each one of its four- r! `fie Couserc;el land usi� cicssificat,ons, The project site does ,inform 'to the established perfcro,,.rer. criteria for any of the Commercial land use designations, nd therefore, the Application is nut consistent with the Land rise Element of tare General plan. (ii) The project site is located on the east side of Milliken Avenue, apprnz'imateiy 45Y north of Highland Avenue. Milliken Avenue is designated a- do xt,,, -rial and is dasi;,ned with a c_ncer median island; The future Foothill F� ews; .rigO = -vf -way abuts the project site at .its southerly perimeter. Milliken A+envt :il,l be an access point to the freeway and wiil be a signalized in .1ersection. These physical constraints have severely limited the access rt,= *ntial of the site. The Proposed access design sh , %-t a median break on M {?l ken about 250 feet from the planned Mill iken/Foothi 11 Freeway intersection and is ',jntrary to the General Plane policy of limiting median breaks on Milliken to 1i4 mile spacings. Also,, there is a reasonable potential '`hat the proposed access design could significantly disrupt the flo6 of traffic on Milliken. Po evidence has been sihn{tted as part of The Appli *tion to substan*_iata that the submitted design can work without res-. ting in significant adverse iawacts. i The General Man directs that Neighborhood Commercial uses b� r, ,crlished as datermined by need. There is a planned i0 acre neigitU t center to be located kt the southwest corner of Milliken and kie 3 dues within the Victoria planned Community. Th planned commercial aL., .40ment would provide the same types of goads an services to be providca by the much smaller and less easily accessible project site. No evidence -ae been submitted as pars: of The Application to substantiate the ex{ t6nce of sufficient consumer dei -and /need to warrant a second commercial cen; -, at this intersection. 1L approve the establishment of a commercial center for which tiaere is no demonstrated need would not be in the best interests of the health, safety or weffare for the citizens of Rancho PLANNING COMMISSION RESOL61(10n) NO. GPA 87 -04A - DI IORIO f ` September 2d, 1087 Page 3 r' 3. Based upon the substantial evidence p esented to this Commission durii►g the above- reference4 &public hearing 3rd upon the specific finings of fac.. -.Set forth in paragraph 1 and ` above, this C:ission hereby rinds and concludes that The Application would ne)t be consistent wit.`r the Rolicies of the Land Use Element of the General pl.in� would nut be in the best 'JAerest of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and. soul. not protect the health, safety, and welfare of the citizers „of Rancho wcamonga, Califaihia. 4 In conjunction with The Application;, an Initial. Study /Preliminary Ftvironmental.' - Assessment, in conformity with the i .equirements of the California ,�nvi rnnment0 Quality Act, has been prepared; �iowpver, Commission has determined that tht� project could have a s4gnificant at -o'se effect on the enviroment, and hereby declines to make a finding of no signficant impact and to certify a Negative Declaration. I S. Based. upon thew ¢iraings and conclusions cet forth in paragraph I, 2 and 3 abo:s, this'Comarission hereby recrends denial of The Applcation and directs thet 'a certified copy of qqis Resolution and related material be forwarded to the City Council f° fin.— determination, 5. '!'he Deputy Secretary to; t,1is Commission shag`” certify to the .dop,ion of this Resolutio,.. APPROVED AND ADOPTED T1IS 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1987. .'LANNINB COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCMONGA B1_: Larry T. McNI e , a. iwn ATTEST: Bra 4_9U_ Jer, epu y ;_cre ary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the P13nning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamong�,y do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a,regular meeting of the Planning Comm1'ssrun held on the 23rd day of September, 1587, vy the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS, NOES: CO?:MISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: " I C. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLAWNINrri yOWISSION RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF A REQUEST TO AMEND THE iJEVF'rkPMENT DISTRICTS MAP, DDA 87 -Oc, FROM Cp ;. PLANNED COMMUAIr? TO NEIGH003hOOR COMMERCIAL. FOR THE SOUTHERLY 3 ACRES Of A 7.94 ACRE PARCCL LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF MILLIKEN AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 450 FEET NORTH OF HIGHLAND AWNUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKE F.NDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. (I) Joe DiIorio of The Caryp ' evelopment Company has filed an application for the Development District Amendment Flo. 87 -02 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development District Amendment request is referred to as The Application. {ii) on September 23, 1937, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cuuamonga conduoted a duly noticed public hearing on The App 'ssicati .3n and concluded said hearing on that date. mill All legal prerequisites to the adoptior of this Resolution have occurred. 9. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Cc,awission ors she City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This f )*fission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rec.cals, Part A. of this Resolution are true and correct, 2. 8asrd upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced p 01c hearing on September 23, 1987, including written and oral stAff reports, together with public testimony, ;his Commission her3by specifically f °;ids as yellows: (a) The Application applies to the southerly 3 acres of a 7.94 acre parcel of land basically rectangular in configuration, located on the east side of M ;rliken Avenue, approximately 4501 north of Highland Avenue. Said property is currently designated as Caryn Planned Community on the D:?veloptent Districts Map and is substantially vacant land except for an existing telephone switching facility located at the southeast corner of 'the parcel; and (b) The property to the north of the subje ~t site is designated Caryn Planned Cmmunit on the Cevelopment Districts Map and consists of vacant land for future development as a church site {the northerly 5 acres of the subject site) and as existing Single Family Residential, the property to :he south of the subject site is designated Victoria Planned Community on the Development Districts Map and itf presently vacant, unimproved �-- 19 PLANNING COWISSION RESOLUTION DDA; 87 -02 - DI IORIO September .23, 1987 pate 2 land rnd an existing 2 -lane State highway, the property to the east is designated Caryn Planned Comwmity on Oe Development Districts Map and consists of Single Family Residential, and the property to the west is designated Medium Residential (8-14 du /ac);on the Development Districts Map (a proposed amendment to the site to Low- Mkiium Residential has been requested pay ODA 87 -07) and is presently vacant, unimproved land; and (c) The Application requests the AmendmeW't of the Development Districts Map from Caryn Planned Community'; to Nei,�nborhood Commercial. for the southerly 3 acres of the 7.94 acre parcel; :end (d) The Application would not be consistent with the Land Use - le-ent c,' 'the General plan, could potentially result in significant adverse ipacts t. persons and property in the immediate vicinity of the subject site, d would not be in the best interests of the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: (i1 The General Plan establishes performance criteria in terms of purpose, lut nt, parcet size, leasable building area and market service area for each one of tts four specific C(anercial land use classifications. The project site does not conform to the establish performance criteria for any of the Commercial land use designations, an therefore, The Appiiea *ion is not consistent with the Land Use Clement of the General pl gin. (ii) The project sift is located on the east side of Milliken Avenue, approximately 450' north of Highland Avenue. Milliken Avenue is designated as an arterial and is designed with a center median island. The future Foothill Freeway right -of -way abuts the project site at its southerly perimeter. Milliken Avenue will be an access point to the freeway and will be a signalized intersection. These physical constra ;nts have severely limited the access potential of the site. The proposed access des%.i shows a median break on Milliken about 260' from the planned Milliken /Foothill Freeway intersection and is contrary to the Generi lan policy of limiting median breaks on Milliken to 1/4 ?pile spacings.. Also, there is a rea= -ibles ootenti*l that the proposed access design could significantly disrupt the flow of traffic on Milliken. No evidence has been submitted as part of the Application to substantiates that the submitted design can work without resulting in significant adverse impacts. (iii) The General Plan directs that Neighborhood Commercial uses be located and established as determined by need. TW-e is a planned 10 acre neighborhood shopping center to be located at the southwest corner of Milliken and Highland Avanues within the Victoria Planned Community. This planned commercial development would peovide the same types of goods a4t. services to be provided by the much smaller .-rd less easily accessible proje site. No evidence has been submitted as part of The Application substantiate the existea,ce of sufficient consumer demand /need to. warrant a second commercial cents.,, at this intersection. To approve the establishment of a commercial center for which there is no demonstrated need would, not be in the best interests of the health, safety or welfare for the citizens .f Rancho ucamonga. lQ f PLANNING CfMMISSIOPWRESOLUTION DDA 87 -02 - DI .IPAIO September 23, 13$J, Page 3 3. BaseB upon the substantial eviJence presented to this Co. a ss a during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth- in paragraph ' and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes that the Application would not be consistent w4th the policies of the Land Use Element of the Venerii Plan, would not be in the best interest of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and would not ,protect the h.aalia, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga, Califoniia. 4. In conjunction with The Application, an Initial Study /Prbliminary Envirodbental Assessment, in conformity with the ,requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, has been prepared,,. however, Ctmotission has determined that this project cools have a significant adverse effect on V.e environment, and hereby declines to make a finding of no 090ficant impact and to certify a Negative Declaration. S. Based (ipon the findings and conclusions set forth in .aragrapb 1, 2 and 3 abov , this Comtmissio.i hereby recommends denial of The Application and dlrec *s that a certified copy of this Resolution and related w.tarfa3 be forwarded to the City Council for final dc:terminatiot,, 6. The Deputy Secretary to chis Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVE" AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF cEP17MBER, 1987. PLANNING COWISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCARONM BY: arry u I e I , d 1 rmia A ATTEST: Brad a er," eau y re ry I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Cotttwtission of* the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was dvly anq regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of th6 City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular weetiq of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of September, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES., COMISSIONERS: , HOES: COFllSSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 9, 1987 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Corrmissic% 1977 FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner: BV: Cynthia S. Kinser, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 87-018 -ItEIRTiEC' PROPERTIES `, re*lues o amen tFie ,an `133°5 l: eme��- the,-,'eneral Plan €rom Office to Neighborhoad Commercial for 3.58 acres of land located .,n the southwest corner of- Lomita Court and Archibai;i Avenue - APN 202 -151 33., ENV'.RONNZ -dTl„_ ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT -537- - - A req-:est to amen thL eve opmeir s ri-i —W�prom "q " (Office/ Professional 1, to "NC" (Neighborhood Comarer6j.al ) for 3.58 acres of land located on tNe southwest corner of Lomita Court and Archibald Avenue - APN 202- 161-33. I. ABSTRACT: The applicant, Weirick Properties, has initiated a =enerTPlan and Developmen* Districts Amendment to change the existing Office designation to Neighborhood Wnercial for 3.58 acres of land on the southwest corner of towita Court and Archibald Avenue. Staff has completed an EnvironrOntal Assessment and analysis of the proposal and requests the Commission's direction. Y3. - -gOJECT Ar9 SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Re uesied: AR,end the General Flan !.and Use Element Tr -fo -Neighil,jrhood Commercia, and the Development District Map from "OP" (Office /Professyonal) to w! (Neighborhood/ Commercial) (see Exhibit *A"), B. Location: Southwest corner of Lomita Court and Archibald 7�venu "t " C. Parcel ;;ize: 3.58 arses D. Existing Development Districts: "DP" (Offi4!e /Professianal) E. `Existing land Use: Va ^ant and undeveloped I -EM, r PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 87-046/DDA 87 -03 - WEIRICK PROPERTIES September 23, 1987 Page 2 11 Surrounding Land Use and Zaninv; North - Vacant /Office; Office /Professional South - Neighborhood Shopping Center; Neighborhood Commercial East - Senior Housing; High Density Residential (Senior Housing Overlay District) West - Apartments, Neighborhood Commercial; Medium -High Density. Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre), Neighborhood Commercial G. Surrounding General Plan Desianatians: North - Office South - Neighborhood Commercial East - High Density Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) West - Medium -Eiigh Density Residentiai (14-24 dwelling units per acre) H. Site Characteristics.. This site is vacant with no significant vege a on. e s e drops in elevation from the north the south 18 feet at 3 percent. Iii, BACKGROUND: In November of 1986, the City Council reviewed a ann ng ommission recommendation on potential City- initiated General Plan Amendments for selected Office /iommerciai sites throughout the City. This site was nevi ?vied try the Fanning Commission for a change from Offire to Neighborhood Commercial. The Planning Commission recommended that the site remain in the Office designation. At the City Council sleeting, representativi =s of the ;� .yperty designation. The City favor Council discuss >nhhanh the matter teas continued at the request of the uroperty owners until additional market information could be provided to the City Council by the property owners.. In May of 1987, Piannirg Associater, consultant to the prop :rty owner, prepared a market analysis oir the site. and asked that the matter be b1ought back to the City Council} for consideration. When the Planning COWission initially reviewed the matter (Office to Commercial), their decision not to recommend a change centered around a dW re to provide a site for ,office services adjacent to the ne.trby senior houzing development. in addition.._ the Commission was concerned with the expanding of the a,•ready numc-ous Neighborhood Commercial uses in the area. The ikarket tEtcdy concludes that OffiW uses only are not viable in today's market. The st idy does not address futare needs of the %area or City -wide demand for commercl.11y zoned land. PLANNING COMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 87- 048 /DDA 87 -03 - WEIRICK PROPERTIES If September 23, 1887 Page 3 In July of 1987, after review of the Planning Corsission's concerns and the market analysis, the City Council indicated they were corcerned with the proposed retail commercial and indicated that they would only consider some type of commercial and office mixed uses there if their concerns were successfully resolved. It was noted that some foil "T of a master }clan pass needed that would consider retail uses at tlat corner upon the following: 1. Retention of a significant portion of the site for office and office - elated,u­as; and 2. Planning Commission approval of a development plan (for entire site) to promote a mixed use concept; and 3. A significant portion of the project be devoted to pure office with no store fAonts or parking directly in front of buildings (office); and 4. That the design be compatible with and sensitive to the residential character (the mixed use pro; need not be of a residential character) of the senior ho'L ,. ug complex to the west; and 5. Project phasing be included mlich calls for timely development of office services to insure that all "the retail ammrcial is not constructed first and the Offices are never developed. The property owner was also told by the Council that to pursue the matter a forma-. application for a General Plan and Development District Amendment should be submitted for consideration by the Planning Commissio�i. 1149 property mmerfapplicant has submitted this General Plan and Devei ,)pmvent District Amendment requesting a change of the existing desi5aation from Office to Neighborhood Commercial. In addition, a de,telopmenx plan (see Exhibit "C" through OF ") (CUP 87 -28) has been submitted for the site. l'he plans have been reviewed by the Technical, Grad ?n(, and Design Review Committees. All three Cc=ittees identified some unresolved issues that warranted further revisions prior to the plans being reccotnmer ed foe approval and forwarded to the Planning Commission. Ths Technical and Grading Review Committees have ,reviewed the submitted site plan. Tnc plot indicates the souVw, zt corner of the Site will be raised to promote a snli't level office building. ?his will create a 2:1 slope tietween the proposed site and the shopping center to the south. The applicant has been requested to revise the site plan to Minimize the amount of necessary grading. G-3 U PLANNING COWISSION STA!rF REPORT ,`\ fWA 87- 048 /DDA 87-03,- WEYRICK PROPERTIES Seoember 23, 1987 Page 4 The Design Review Committee had the following concerns in, reviewing the site plan. The site plan has a fast food pad in the north st corner of the s1te, due to the elevation of the land at the pad, the fast food` drive -thru would be in Full view of Archibald Avenue and Lomita Court if not properly screened. Further, that the fast food restaurant may not have approoiate stack igg distance for the rrive-thru. A strong pedestrian link should be, , developed between the proposed project and the senior housing project.. The architecture should have an authentic structural appearance and design features should be continued to all sides of the building. Further, concerns regarded a stronger pedestrian oriencation to provide an inviting, convenient, and safe circulation system and with the sub - circulation system and parking spaces for the proposed fast rood restaurant. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The Initial Study has been completed by s .a an no _ s gi`nifictnt adcgrse *nviropmental impacts were identified to be.assai.iated rtth the proposal. Y. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ANALYSYS: Them is development on all four siaes of the site see hffb-it "B "). To the south is the Alpha Beta, commercial center, of which the rear loading area of the center is adje:ent to the site. To the west is a senior housing development with a block wall that separates the two, sites. To the north across Lomita is a Vacant lot afim;i, has a master plan approved for the expansion of a retail hardy +;,iry store and office building. To the East across Archibald is An apartment complex and a retail neighborhood shopping center. These land use amendments must be reviewed for their consistency to the General Plan, the compatibility with surrouAdfng land uses, and the need for tommercial uses in the area. _ Consisteecy- - AftKifir- to'41he General '`an, Neighborhood Commercial designation includes convenience c"iercial clusters. This designation.j s intended for small, localized retail; and /or service businesses that provide goods and merchandise of a day -to- day convenience need for the resSdants of the immediate neighborhood. A criteria is thti.t _t.`zes,e convenience clusters should be within easy walking oy�- ,.king distance of the intended user. E The subject site is within walking distance of a senior housing � development on the west and two apartment compl-,xes, one to the northwest and the other to the cast across Archit' A. The 'site if aprwapriately designed could provide for the specific needs of the ,l Total residents. i PLANNING COW SSION STAFF REPORT GPA 87- 04B/DDA R7 -03 - NEIRICK PROPERTIES September 2,, 1 #87 Page 5 Compatibility- ?F;e site is north of the Base Line and Archibald interse#.ion wi(%t� Ybntaint neighborhood commercial . shopping centers on the northwest (Alpha Beta) and,- southwec -+ (Alhertsons) corners and convenience coamrciai centers rn the northeast (Stop N Go) and southwest (Ba&in- Robbins /Taco " Bell) corners. The General Plan supports clustered development rather than strip commercial development. The subject site would continue commercial dere?oprent from the Archibald /Base Line intersection up to the Lomi trx Court. 11!ere�'Is an existing sen or housing project adjacent to the west of the subject site. IN6'Sehior Housing Overlay District (SHOO) requires that Senior projects be located in proximity %o needed goods, services, and amenities such as groceries, bip7kis, medics'./ dental, public transit, open space, etc. A commercial /office center on the subject sit_ could provide many of these goods and services needed, by the seniors and oth,�r adjacent residetlt% and would compliment the existing land uses. Need: The General Plan intends that commercial land uses should be established based up ,3a as need for the ,goods and services �Jlo be provided. A market study has been propared 14 conjunction with this project to ascertain the need for commercial urns at this location. The study concludes that commercial usas are necessary at this location for a successful project. Office onli would not be a viable use. Site Specific Issuos: In addition to the move analyzal criteria/ issues usually analyzed *,dth General Plan Amer,_mv its. The City Council `mas also t!stabiished;,site- specific criterlu to address specific :oncerns raised by thd`Council when they first considered a Commercial designation for the site in duly of this yea-,.' An analysis of the st 4es of the five site specific criteria as established j the City Council is as follows: 1. Retention of a significant portion of the -,ite for office and office related uses. o The sabmitted site plin indicates that 60% cf the proposed square footage is devoted to retail /commercial and'40% to office. Staff requests direction as to; whether 40% is "significant "„ Z. ,Planning Commission approval of= a development plan (for entire site) to promote a nixed use concept. o All the issues regarding the site plan have not been resolved, however the proposed plan does indicate corm,4cial cri,d office development for the site. r. 6 -5 r` '- PLANNING COMdISSFOR STAFF REPORT GPA 87- 046IDD,,,V -03 - WEIRICK PROPERTIES i September 23, 1987 Pdge 6 3. A' significant portion of the project be devoted to pure office with no storefronts or parking directly in front of buildings (office). 0 The site plan doss indicate that no storefronts or parking will be directly in front of the offic;� ,„ building from Archibald Avenue. 4. " That the design be t�cmpatible with and sensitive to the residential character, (the mixed use project need not be of a residential charkter) of the senior housing complex to the we-t. ' o The `site plan in its current state does not recognize the senior housing .::4evelopment to; the utst. However, the applic>) has indicated # At he will work with the senior housing davelopment to i create' ,a pedestrian link between the 'wo developments. 5. Project phasing be included which calls for timely deielopment of office services to insure that all the retail commercial is not constructed first and the offices are never developed. e At this time we do not have any information as to the possible phasing of this plan. VI. DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENUMEV ANALYSIS:. State law requires feat e eve opmsn s r c s, e. ng Ordinance, be consistent with the Gleaeral Plan (Sectian$6C, Government Code). If findings cannot be made to +parr the _jGeneral Plan Amendment, similar findings should also bL; . atde� ' arding the Develop►aert District Amendment. VII. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order to approve the Seneral Plan and UeveT''.n ct Amendments, the Commisfion would have to d- �rmirne that the change would promotirUe land use goals and Policies of the General Plan, would not be mAteria'ily detrimental to the ,adjacent properties or would cause significant adverse environmental impacts, the following are the findings that are necessarj: A. The Amendments do not conflict with the Land Use Policies of tite General Plan; and B. The Amendments do promote goals of the Land Use Element; and C. The Amendments ,could not be materially injurious o„, detrimer4 to the adjacent properties; and o PLANW14G GOMMISSI" .STAFF REPORT GPA1187.04B/GOA AT 4'4� - WEIRICK PROPERTIES SeptbW;ea 23, I987 Ji Page T j D. That the 1 -.- ject PrupertY is suitable ,for the': gses perwitt-d in the pr used 6strict In te�*s of access, size, and' comp tibi IV _with existing load use in � surro'oing areas. ".II. CORRESPONDENCEz This'ftm has been Advertised as a public hearing noti the' a te- Xt newspaper. The prdP' etY waa posted, gd notices were a71. property owners witnin 300 feet ;� ;� � project site. Ix. RECOt iEfBDATI : Staff would reco -mmond one of two alternatives lt,, me ann ng Commission: (I) Deny, without prejudice, the request;" and (2) Continue 'the request to resolve_sitc development isspes. If the Commis-sign concurs with option #I; at it "lon of the attached Resolutions would be in order. If aratiod i2 is the desired alternative, then the Gomission should direct \toff ant J the applica6nt in resolving z p ecifU, sjaes �1 1 Res K''uliy hied, f Sra . le c it y Fanner BB.CK:te Attitchments: Exrtibit "A" - General Pla* and Devei'opiaent District Map Exhibit V - Location Map E,Yin� bit "C" - Site Plan EXs bit `D "- - Office Building Elevations xhibit, "E" - Commercial Building Elevations ExhiW'.; "F° _ Fast Food Building FTivations Draft Fte .- ons of Denial tl e rr it General Plan IDOV1019 -PM".t Districts CITY OF 45 PA 67 -�t34S�,D, RANCHO CoUCATNIONGA Tr-rLso PLANNING DIVISION 0701-02 0 - - O Ll ^r•eTA G i 6vulw► I ILU�L, q LL tz= 1A .4 FASI FW ►W I ZU. A Cal wc- 1�21 w 4r9*ft3W �ft —CK:: p.%ft Los f.1 IA WS -030SM' LC = ft W4*vm IRAW r. "W we 2"MW 4 -7 --------------------- is ft4w S, 110 IAKXArm )fits ?,A 'I- ft C ZF jungj SECMNA•A DefaUed Sj* Man BERM ME W=_ WEIRiCK PROPERTY cwo Rancho Cucamonga, California 1 � � *��r �� � 4� .n a. y _ ��" � ���. ��� �� �'i•.:i� IE i Amonwb WEIRICK PROPERTY am W-2 pq PMT' . r-1 RESOLUTION <. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION DENYING A REQUEST TO AMEND THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN, AMENMENT NO. 87 -04B REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM OFFICE TO NEIGHBORHOOD OMMERCIAL FOR 3.58 ACRES LOCATED 06 THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOMITA COURT AND APCHIBALD AW NUE - APN: 202 - 151 -33. A. Recitals. (i) Weirick Properties has filed an application for the General Plan Ame ^dment No. 87 -046 as described in thc' title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On September 23, 1S87, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the vpplication and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to .the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This, Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based _goon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on September 23, 1987 including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the southwest corner of !..omita Court and Archibald Avenue with a street frontage of 523 feet and lot depth of 298 feet and is presently vacant; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is vacant, the property to the south of that site consists of a neighborhood commercial center, the property to the east is apartments and neighborhood commercial center, and the property to the west is senior housing. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission is during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: 6-1q PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 87- -048 - WEIRICK September 23, 2487 Page 2 (a) That the subject property is not suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed amendment in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and (b) TW, the proposed amendment change would have sigh- ificant irpact, on the environment and the surrounding properties; and (c) That the proposed amendment change is not in conformance with the General Plan. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1470 and, further, this Commission hereby recommends issuance of a M*gative Declaration. 5. based upon the findings and conclusions Set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above,, this Commission hereby resolves as follows; (a) That pursuant to Section 65850 to 66865 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Coessission of the ;ity of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends denial ,on the 23rd day of September, IM, General Plan Amendmen* No. 87 -048. (b) The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council deny General Plan Amendment 87 -04B. (c) That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be -forwarded, to the City Council. 6. The Aeputy Secretary to this Commission shall ' certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1987. PLANNING COMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCK. -ONGA BY: erry T. MEMO, a rman ATTEST• Brad BUM—r, epu y ecre ary r-1 — .5 , 9 PLANNING CO MISSION RESOLI;NION 140. GENERAL PLO AI�f NOW $7 -048 - WE RICK September 23; 1#87 Page 3 I: Brad Buller, fieputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and idopted by the Planning- CoAnission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of Sop *er, 1987, by the following vote to -wtt AYES: COWISSI6M' ER'S: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT. COMMISSIONERS: i 11 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION DENYING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CHANGE NO. 87 -03, REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE DISTRICT DESIGNATION FROM OFFICEIPROFESSIANAL TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL FOR 3.58 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOMITA COURT AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE - APR: 2022- 151 -33 A. Recitals. (i) Weirick Properties has filed an application for the Developim_nt District Change No. 87 -03 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the.-,,subject Development District Change request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On September 23, 1987, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to thi4 adoption a! 'his Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cuca,.*nga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby spF,Wically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Bas d --on substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on September 23, 1987, including written anC oral staff reports, together with public testimony; this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows; (a) The application applies, to property located at the southwest corner of Lomita Court and Archibald Avenue with a street frontage of 523 feet and lot depth of 295 feet ind is presently vacant; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is vacant, the property to the south of that site consists Af a neighborhood commercial center, the property to the east is apartments and neighborhood commercial center, and the property to the west is senior housing. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: r -17 PLANNING ,OM,�II�;SION STAFF REPORT DDA 87-0; '� XtRICK PROPERTIES Septembe�,P , 1987 Page 4 (a) That subject property is npt sui able for the us(', permitted in the propose *,� strict in terms of access, Size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surroanding area; and (b) That the proposed district change would have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties•, and (c) 'That the proposed district change is not in conformznce with the Ge:teral Play. El a- This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality ,act of 1,970 and, further, this Commission hereby recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusion ,,,'set forth in paragraph 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby resolves as-follows: (a) That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 c; the California Government Code, that the Planrui� Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends dei.ial on the 23rd day of September, 1987, District Change No. 87 -03. (b) The Punning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council deny and adopt District Change No. 87- 03. (c) That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted uy the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. F. The Deputy Secretary to this commission shalt certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF TriE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: arry T. MCNIMTfia rman ATTEST: ra a _er—.-Yepu y SecretaFy 11 PLANNING COj� SSION STAFF REPORT DDA 87;03 EIRICK RDPERTIES, September,/43, 1987 Page 3 I, Strad Buller, De ruty Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, .40 hereby certify that the foregoing - Resolution was duly and re_! Zzarly,- fntrp&lced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Coy mission of the � `ty of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Comission held on the 23rd data of September, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS* NOES: COMFiISSIONERS: ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 0 E 2 nTMTT f%" T)`� c,'l�1 r._ln nTrn A 1fn1Tl� ... ...r�,,....�, n GV` nmon STAFF REPORT' Q a F z DATE: September 23, 1987 ter,. TO: Chairman ,Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Miki Bratt, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 87, -04C req5es o amen e an use a emen a e genera. Plan from Flood Control to Law - Medium Density Residential (4-8 dwellings units peg acre) Co Low - Medium Residential `4-8 dwellings units per acre) for 65 acres of land located at °Lhe southwest corner of Banyan and Milliken - APH: 201 - 271 -55. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT appTication to amend Me Develo pmen s r c p from Flood Control and Medium Residential (8-14 dweili",i —Its per acre) to Low - Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling _- is per acre) for 65 acres of land, located on the wt%st side of Milliken Avenue, north of Highland Avenue - APN: 201- 271 -55. I. ABSTRACT: This General Plan Amendment was initiated by Ahmanson lYveTopment Corporation. The property is hounded on the south by the proposed Route 30 Freeway right -of -way, on the west by Deer Creek Food Control Channel, and on the east by the Caryn Planned Commr.nity. The applicant is requesting a General Plan Amendment for Flood Control and designated high school site to Low - Medium Density. The applicant also requests a Development District Amendment from Flood Control and Medium Density Residential to Lownl4edium Residential for the northernmost 55 acres of the property. The remaining portion of the property coirscides with the future alignment of the Route 36 Freeway and would retain the existing Medium Residential zone. The applicant has also submitted plans for a total development residential subdivision, Tentative Tract 13748. The project design and site plan are being reviewed and will be presented to the Planning Commission at the October 14, 1987 meeting (refer to Exhibit "G" for development plans). II. BACKGROUND: The applications before yol are made in conjunction w a o al development residential subdivision on 65 acres of land which were reserved but no longer needed for floid control and a high school site. A previous ap,,tlication for residential development of northernmost 40 acres of the site was withdrawn. ITEM H D;p PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 87 -04C & ODA 87-7 - Ahmanson Develcpments, In;,. September 23, 1987 Page 2 - III. PROJECT ANO SITE DESCRIPTION: Applications for an amendment to e Land Use-Wip o"i "G�nera7 Plan and to the Development District Map have been made in conjunction with a total residential subdivision consisting of 231 lots A. Action Requested: The applicant requests approval of applications to amend the Land, Use Map of the General Plan from Flood Control to Low - Medium Density Residential and to amend the 0 veiopm&it District Map from Flood - control and Medium Density Residential.to Low- Medium Density Residential. B. Location: Southwest corner of Banyan Avenue and Milliken venue: C. Parcel Size: 65 acres D. Surrounding-Land Use and Zoning: WrTn - Vacant; Flood CGh -I South - Singlo family residential and vacant; Low- Medium Density (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and Neighborhood Commercial (;Victoria Planned Community) East - Single family residential; Caryn Planned Community West - Vacant; Flood Control /Medium Density (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Low- Medium 1%4-8 dwelling units per acre) E. General Plan Desionations: Protect -Site - Flood control and Medium Density (8-14 dwelling units per acrp) North - Flood Control and Low Density (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) South - Medium -Nigh Density (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) East - Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) Best Low- Medium Density Residential (4.8 dwelling units per acre) and Medium Density Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) F. Site Characteristics: Alluvial fan covered by=- Alluvial Scrub vegetation, including woody shrubs, annual grasses and a few trees, sloping to the southwest. 0 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 87 -04C'& DDA 87 -7 - Ahmanson Developments, Inc. September 23, 1987 Page 3 IV. ANALYSIS: A. Existing Land Use Designation: The General Plan Land Use Map designates Flood Contror an -a High School site on the property. - The County of An Bernardino 11ood Control Department advises that because Deer Creek has been channelized, the flood control designation may be rempgved from the site (correspondence attached), Paffey High ,�"„iool district advises that a 40 a•re high school - s-ite for the area has been purchased on Rochester Avenue just south of Highland Avenue and therefore a high school site at this location is not needed (correspondence attached). The Development District designation for the property is Flood Con;.�rol and Medium Density. B. Proposed Land Use: The applicant proposes a Low- Medium Residential Wes g�afion for the northerly S5 acres. the Low- Mediuit designation is :compatible with the resi�jential character of the Caryn Planned Communit on the east aid the Victoria Planned Communitt­ n the south. The remaining piece coterminous with the proposed Route al Freeway right -of -way is not a part of thi! application and will retain a Medium Density zoning desigrratio#. C. Proposed Develop�ient District wv-si nab Lion: Because the existing -Ted oa con ro�topen s are and medium densilty residential use, '"±e proposed Low - Medium Residential designation will not significantly change the overall intensity of use of the property. 0. Previous General Plan Amendment Application: 5z.:a4se of a. ann ng oMass on recommendation Fore ;a3, a peeviots application for General Plan Ammerdment for the northerly 40 acres of this property was withd ;•awn by the applicant prior to considwation bylttte City..Cou:ocil on March,4, 1587. With the previous application, the Planning Com issi.en was concerned with issues of circulation, grading and lot size. The current applicant has addressed these issued. Proposed densities are copsistent with surrounding 'land uses. The proposed minimum lot size is 7,500 square feet. Furthermore, the conceptual design submitted indicates Ct feasibility of a grading design c:nsistent with general plan policies. V. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The 'Initial Study has been complet €d by staff and no si gni Yi car adverse environmental impacts have been identified. '� ,I z PLANNING C0WISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 87 -04C A DDA 87 -7 - Ahmanson Developmenit, I+tc. September 23, 1987 Page 4 VI. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: A. Because the total number of residential units will remain about the same with the proposed land use designation as with the existinf-; land use plan, there would be no significant adverse impacts as a result of the land use amendment. B. Because Deer Creek has been channelized tae site is no longer required for flood control purposes, a General Plan designation for flood control is no longer required. Also because a high school site has been purchased nearby by Chaffey High School District, a General Plan High Schecl, site designation is no longer required. Therefore, a chankje of land =se from flood control and high school site is consisteri? with the policies of the General Plan. C. Because the Low- Medium Residential .,se' wbuld retain the single family character of the surrounding area, the General Plan Amendment would be consistent with the goals of the Land Use Element and there would be ry material in3uy or detriment to adjacent properties. 0. A finding of no significant impact has been made and a Negative Declaration is being prepared pursuant to CEQA. VII. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has b�e•i advertised as a public ear.ng in F Daily Report newspaper, notices were sent to all property owners within 300' feet of the project site, and the property has been posted''nith a 4' x 8' supplemental notification 'an, VIII: "'�"iDATION: Staff recommends that `he Planning Commission o Me'Gity Council a Resolution rLcommending adoption of an GFA W. -W i DDA 87 -07. If the Planning. Commission co, MCUrs, then ar';;pttcr of the attached Resolutions world be appropriate. nr crte.�1tately, the Planning Commission may continue },he public nearing to tha October 14, 1987 meeting in order to,consider the GPA and DDA along with the application for approval of total development residential subdivision, Taitative Tract 13748. Resp ully s fitted, ,OW i ara Bud er City Pi'anner BB :MB: vc PL bN U .0 C� 55, 0 R 3T GFA 87: TIFF F0 - Ahragnson Developments,, Inc. Septembe 23, I98 Page 5 r, kttaetsments: Exhi Vicinity Map SMibit "B" - Existing Lrjd Use Exhibit "CO -- Existing Several Plan /Zoning Exhibit "(1" - Zone. -Mange Flap - Exhibit "E" - Letter from San Bernardino County Flood Control - District Exhibit "F" •* Letter from Chaffe Nigh' School District Exhibit "G" - - bex9lopt;_,zt Plans "G•1" - Tentative Tract %, 13748 "G -g" vte Flan xG -3" - Grading Plan Buildinq Architectu' -e GesolutiO) Approval of (GFA, 87 -04C) Resolution of Approval (OUA 87-O'ko wish Attachmenix.m i EGPA 88 - 030 LM3 L) LM FV FC: e L L (5,500 - 11,000sgJt„ LOS'S) > A 1 J11:1 '� w All L r w- e L (4.000 10,000sq.tt. LOTS) f FUTURe FQOTHIL`L FIRc+AY Ll 0 c c HIGHLAND AVE. L L L VICTORIA � VICTORIA rH CITY OF ITEM: ;. -�. PLANNING DIVEM XHIBIT: A_ SC.A LE- �e I S.VACANT VACANT VACANT from FC' to 'LM* C. 4 . rrw { frcm*M' Y4'LA4' Plann*d church im �gp a VACANT y' MP � 1 FUTM FOOTHILL g FRLE6YAY m � VACANT I� VACANT ��''� r .: 4iti�:: nea•a•. JI i 79 0 Ft's VA6AN par, l ra VACANT 170 AC A30 w VICTORIA P.C. t � l'1Md H AWL CITY OF rmm RANCHO Cl, MOINGA_ TrrLE= PLANNING rXVLSUt� ' _ EX! n3m. __ __ scALE Gongiral Plan rrrOr •r ;rfd`rr 'P' .,.:fir. G )rrrfr °flrlrY DA D11 sr • BANYAN •QP +• 1 } 1 . P • • 1 P • :} •1'i f • 1 • 1 • • • F • • 1 ! • 1• Y P• R•• •R• 1• r 1IR P i •• i • •• ` y m�a�sf FOOTHOL FWY � re�rrew�sf.w •of orr isra `refs :,•• rrrfrrrrr rrr rrrfrfrrr `ess .rrrrrrerr • R R M R e i 1 i 1 1 — • R' e • a • 1 • • i ieR• r111i/ � � +� MILLIKEN • e c• e• i e e11 e•�e• r• .1 a ••ifs �„ f 0 1• R i i s ij. I a • 1 1 � • ♦ • 1 CTS (,)F RA11C.i O 3✓UCt 11YaV PLANNING DI'VISON r OAHYAN HIGHLAND EXHIBIT- SCALE= a -,A .. _. VACANT VACANT -- YAFRkT tram $FC' to %M* , t _ t ac. r •V from' to"LM' Y CA FUTURR FCCTIML FRUWAY VACANT VACANT ' tt i f "� "s r �': �• VACANT as „ Part ,+ VACANT r 170AC i ,._ �� A3a0 AC I r NORTH CITY, OF 7 A ILle RAICHO CUCAMONUA TITLE= pLANNNM DIVISION EXHIBlT:.:-DL,_, ,;-ALE: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTtkTION/ COUNTY Or SAN BOMA FLOOD CONTROL/AiRP RTS ������r�' %yam � PUBLIC wanes AGEA ,- 825 East Thitd Strw. - $an'BsmardIW, CA 9,415 -0835 • 171;19 3$7.2800 may/ ��i� MICHAEL G. E /�`�\ Director September a, 1987 File: 1- 550/1.00 117.0515 �t.aaNlr." ulss:p:: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department kit PM P.O. Box 807 7�$��^iitilitlkiii:3t,1t5Fs Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 a Attention: Ms. Cynthia Kincser Re: Zone 1, Deer Creek Channel - GPA 87 -04C Gentlemen: This letter will confirm our September 2, 1987 conversation regarding the Flood Control Zone over the northern portion of the site and provide a flood hai, -ftrd review on the referenced developme The site is located north cif #iighland Avenue and east of the DW Creek Channel in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The historic Deer Creek flow path traverses the westerly, portion of th,i site. The Deer Creek Channel, a rectangular concrete Chan ,mil constructed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, intercepts and conducts the major flows tributary to the historic flow path around the site. The historic flow path still has a tributary ?Area of approximately 1 square mile as it enters the site. The tributary area to the site is considered localized in nature, therefore the District would not object to the removal of tha Flood Control Zone over the northerly portion of the site. In our opinion, this proposed development is reasonably free of serious flood hazards from major flood channels and drainage courses. Those portions of site lying in and abutting the historic Deer Creek flow path and its overflow area, may be subject to infrequent flood hazard by rel,son of overflow, erosion and debris deposition until adequate facilities are provided to intercept and conduct the flows through and away from the site. It is therefore recommended that a separate report be obtained from the City Engineer's Office to local and on -site drainage conditions. This office has previously reviewed the dewatering of the historic. Deer Creek flow path into Deer Creek Channel proposed by engineering firm of ball & Foreman. Our response dated Au 12, 1986 is attached. —1 V EXHIBIT "E" +`ts! y±T. a° Vetter to the City of Rancho Cucamonga September 4, 1987 Page 2 Our recommendations for development of the,site are as follows:. 1. Arketgutt6 1krovisions shall be r+.ade to intercept and conduct tha,off -sit+e tributary drainage flow around or through the ',site in a manner which will not adversely affect adjacent or downstream properties. 0 The dewaterinj of.thq. site shall be approvedrey *he Flood Control Dietzict and the Corps of Engiriears (ia. ?, Our August 12, 1986 letter) . A 6 -foot block wall or',iother District approved barrier shall b* constructeq� along the District's Deer Creek Channel rights -of- a. In addition to the�Drainage Requirements stated herein, other "on- site" or Koff -site" inprovements �tiay be required which cannot be determined from tenikative plans at this time and would have to be reviewed..�after more complete improvement ,plans and drainage analysis have been submitted to this office. 5. Section 16.0212(g) of the County Code sets the fee for this review and analysis at $200.00. This fee is to be submitted directly to the District office with an indication that it is for Flood Hazard Review of File No. 117.0516. The fee should be mailed to: San Bernardino County Flood Control District Water Resources Division 825 E. Third Street, Room 120 - San Bernardino, CA 92415 -0835 There will be no further review of, or�,permits issued for this site until the fee has been reo'tived. t Should you have any further questiom cmx=ning this Iaatt.4 j r please feel free to contact the undersigned at (714) 387 -2515. i V�erytruly s / , iF�44 a u✓ W. COMMM, Chief Water Resources Division RWC.mas Attac hmt cc: Craig Pepe ` A i CHAFFED' JOIN' UNION HIGH SCHO01. OISTA ; 211 WEST FIFTH STREET, ONTARIO, CAUFORNIA 91762 -1698 • (714)988.8611' Sv"mtendent of ScnooK Awocia[e Suwnr*rKKnt en As6[.SfdM Supe ^n#++nen[ Mika D. Dkka AgmunattMionlPeraonnol uucnpn DQM E. Smodtari u>s 1wh* 8. Harrison 00ARD OF TRDSTEE9: Kwh;m E Kinkey . girt c. marlin . Rayn and J. Sams . Ctunes 1. Uhd ley ' GeraW W. Won P.Irl- OF RANCkt: PANNI1v . September 10. 1987 AN SEPI 1 t I Miki Bratt Planning Departxi 4n P.O. Box 807 Rancho cucamongr{^;; trA 91730 Re: Highland /M41tl en site Be advised that thir Chaffey JoinfiUnion High School District is no l.cn#sr interested in the Highland /Milliken site. The District has purchased a site on Rochester just south of Highland for its new high school. Si cerely, Stephen L. Butters Director _ Business Services SLB /sb NOUN L v.1 2 -k , V . an co ob Via ..4 lob IMP th aft et Ila R. 14 -- to zip M wk all: h ILA It 3v Z 9p, qv Itz. Ot Enom iollso'lomi 3n%3AV (MVIHO41 A33LAS WVANVS IL 2 -k , V . an co ob Via ..4 lob IMP th aft et Ila R. 14 -- to zip M wk all: h ILA It 3v Z 9p, qv Itz. Ot Enom iollso'lomi 3n%3AV (MVIHO41 3nN ire �m | -_ ' , ' __ . -_---' ,_ ~~�_ _-_�'_-- __-____-_____- � | m` , . . � N��'� k t N—CV a a I No 1 1 2 - L -taNNVHO )433u5 toaa i9 e jo pp, r I _1-1 �i [ f �C f •, 04 0 it K u iarrvHO raar� rasa ' m n 6 V r 'r ; s £'� �- ���;`; �1-'.::. 'c:_; < �� �'` , �� �� .�,.', :� �;, ,. a +� :. �� ryry__ �t�•' . ���." n I /- S.-Ist. Yr J— L m RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLMNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A REQUEST TO AMEND THE LAND USE MAP" OF THE GENERAL PLAN, GPA 87 -04C, FROM FLOOD CONTROL AND FUTURE HIGH SCHOOL TO LOW - MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 63.7 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND BANYAN STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AND MAKE FINOIN(;S IN SUPPOMrf THEREOF. A. Recitals. (i) Ahmanson Development has filed an application for the General Plan Amendment No. 67 -04C as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment r, jest is referred to as "the application% (ii) On September 23, 1487, the Planning Commission of the 'Zity of Rancho Cucamonga conivcted a duly noticed public hearing on t4 application and conclud?d said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically find's that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolut,_,n are true and correct. 2. Based upon su;)stantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on September 23, 1987, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: land basically (a ecta gularpincconfiguration,tlocated patotheasouthwestccorner of Milliken Avenue and Banyan Street. Said property is currently designated as Flood Control and future high school site on the Land Use Map of the General Plan and is presently vacant, unimproved land; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is designated Flood Control on the Land Use Map of the General Plan and is Presently vacant, unimproved land, the property to the south of the subject site is designated Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) and Neighborhood Commercial on the Land Use Map of the General Plan and consists of Single Family Residential and vacant, unimproved land, the property to the east is designated Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) on the Land Use Map of the General plan and consists of Single Family PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. GPA 87 -04C - Ahmanson Developments, Inc. September 23, 1987 Page -2 'Residential (Caryn Planned Community) and vacant, unimproved land, aid the property to the west is designated Flood Control Lox - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) and Medium Residential (8-14 dwellin¢ units per acre) on the Land Use Nap of the General Flan and is presently vacant, unimproved land. 3. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the Ca)ifornia Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission here.ay recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. 4. 9ased upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby resolves as follows: (a) That pursuant to Section 65300 to 65362 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 23rd day of September, 1987, General Plan Amendment No. 87 -04C. (b) The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt -eral Plan Amendment No. 87 -04C. (c) That a Certiii -dd Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: arry T. e a anon ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary I. Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission het on the 23rd day of September-4.1987, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: CObt'+:ISSIONERS: NOES: COWi$SIONE' S: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: �+ —'?-8 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDION APPROVAL OF A REQUEST TO AMEND THE PV NDISTRICTS "MEDIUM Io , "FLOUD CONTRO AD RESNTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO "LAW - MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL" (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OR APPDXIMATELY 53.7 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND BANYAN STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AND MAKE FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. ii) Ahnvnson Development has filed an application for the Development Distri c Amendment No. 87 -07 as described in the ".itle of this Resolution_ - ­H*r4inafter in this Resolution, the subject Development District Change request is referred t:� as "the application ". Rancho Cucamonga0connd September a. duly 9noticed public hearing on tithe application and enncluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites o the adoption of this Resolutie ?- have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: set forthlin theiRe iCommission taal ss part hereby thhis Resolutionnare true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on September 23, 1987, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The applicat•ibn applies to the approximrte 63.7 acres of land basically rectangular in configuration, located at the southwest corner as Flood kCent aluandnMediu Banyan Residential 8I 14prdwellingiunitsrperlacre )ionathe Development Districts Map; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is designated Flood Control on the Development Districts Map, the property to the south of the subject site is designated Victoria Planned Community on the Development Districts Man, the property to the east is designated Caryn Planned Community on the Development Districts Map, and the propltirty to the west is designated Flood Control /Medium Elei.A ty Residential 18-14 dwelling units per acre) and Lcx,4'edium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) on the Development Districts Map. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DDA 87 -07 - AWANSON DEVELOPOENTS, INC. September 23, 1987 Page 2 3. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the pm,4ect has ber %n reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. 4. Hazed upon the findings and conclu. ions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby resolves as follows: tai 'That pursuant to Section 68850 to 55855 of the California Government Code, treat the Planning Commission of the City 3f Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 23rd day of September, 1987, Development District Amendment go. 87 -07. (b) The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Development 5istrict Amendment No. 87 -07 for that property as described In Exhibits "A" and "8 ", and attach0 as pirt of this Resolution hereof. tc? That a Certified Copy of this Resolution. and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. 5. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall cer. -' y to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD OAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. MERlel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller;' Deputy Secretary u I, Brat Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commis5i--1 held on the 23rd day of September, 1587, by the followir, vote�ta -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: C"ISSIONERS: ABSENT: .OWISSIONERS: 1 _l. a 0 _ uuyy HIBI "A" Development District Amendment from Flood Control (FC) and Medium Residential (M) to Low- Media, Residential (LM) for 63.7 acres described as follows: 73.6 acres located on the southwest- corner of Milliken Avenue and Banyan Street described as follow!: - t� The east k of the southeast 4 of SecVA 25, low—. hip 1 Worth, Range West, San Bernardino Je and Meridian, according to United States Govcrnment Township Plat thereof. Except the south 33 feet, as excepted in the deed from Frank' Clinton Haskell and Nevi May Haskell, recorded July 29, 1956 In Book 3975 Page 568 `;Official Retordr-, and in the deeds from Fronk C. Haskell -_and Neva M. Haskell;' recorded ,August 9, 1956 in Book 4008 hle 405, Official Records, and recorded July 31, 195Tin Book 4292 'page 430, Official Recork Also except the northerly 40 feet, as conveyed in,Ae deeds recorded May 15, 1970, in book 7443, Page 476," Offlcial Records, anal recorded 4Ay 15, 19870 In Book 7443, Pag ? k,6, Official.Records. Also except that portion of said land described as foliowzz: Beginning at the northwest corner of said east h of the southeast 4 said Section 25; thence along the north line"r0l said southeast 4, south 89 degrees 14' 32" east, 103.11 feet; thence southwesterly 532.19 Feet along a ncn- tangent curve, concave -,outheastarly, having ! radius of 2030.01 feet and a central angle of 15 degrees of 1' 15 ", the beginning tangent thereof bearing south 19 degrees 57' 20" west, to a point in *0e west Tine of said east 'i of the southeast 4 of said Section 25, distant thereon south 0 degrees 40' 21" west, 519.72 feet from the point of beginning; thence along said west line, north 0 degrees 40` 21" east, 519.72 feet to the point of beginning. Except the southerly 9.9 acres of the 73.6 acres as reheenced on Exhibit "B ", attgched to and made a part hereof. _s. VAC 9 i1� r fttTU6lt �OOi1 -.u. � rAiiWAL' '-..' VACANT VACANT j Or i`tt ���° VACANT 4A CANT ! ira ,NBILtCLY —Z► _ CITY OF rrEM- I rH r, EXI-PSIT -"B 1 � i VACANT VACANT VACANT F i ici a Y r 1 VAC 9 i1� r fttTU6lt �OOi1 -.u. � rAiiWAL' '-..' VACANT VACANT j Or i`tt ���° VACANT 4A CANT ! ira ,NBILtCLY —Z► _ CITY OF rrEM- I rH 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 23, 1937 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Miki Bratt, Assistoat Planner F SUBJECT: 5NVIRONNENTAL ASSES,94ENT AND GENERAL PLAk AMENDMENT 87 -041 =�TAC BEYEl t"L - -A reques to amen e General aF 4, se _ p ran Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling unit #; per acre) to High Residential (24 -30 dwelling units per acne) for 5,.45 acres of land located an the south side of Base Line Road, west of Archibald - A.PH: 208 - 031 -18, 19, DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 87 -05 TAC DEVELOPMENT UORPOMU' - A request to amen, a the-Development Is r e s p from ow- Medius Residential (4-8 0i -suing units per acre) to High Residential (24 -30 dwe7lxis'4 units per acre) attached with the Senior Housing Overlay District (SHOD) to the base district for 5.05 acres of land located on the south side of Base Line Road, :rest of Archibald Avenue - APN: 208 - X031 -189 19. I. ABSTRACT: The applicant has subs— ed a development proposal under e n or Housing Overlay D14trict-_(SHttl3) of the DcXr'Wpment Code. The suWttAl package includes a request for a OevO opment Agreement, for a General Plan Amendment, for a Development 01s';;nict Amendment and an application for project approval of a 17U unit senior housing project or 5.5 gross acres of land and approval of a related project, of an adjacent $1.,150 square foot medical office building on 1. 69 gross acres of land. Because the General P"tan land use change from Low - Medium Density to Figh Density depends on the use of the site for Senior }lousing, approval of the Development Agreement must be concurrent with approval for the General Plan Amendment and Development nistrxt, Amendments. At this time the Development Agreement has not been finalized. Also, the project design ';id site plan are being reviewed. It is anticipated that the Peve opment Agreement and project review will be completed by October 'r8, 1987. Therefore, the Planning Commission is requested to hold a public hearing for preliminary review and comment on the entire package and to continue the public hearing to October 28, 1987 for final recommendation to the City Council. ITEM I • tM SUBJECT: 5NVIRONNENTAL ASSES,94ENT AND GENERAL PLAk AMENDMENT 87 -041 =�TAC BEYEl t"L - -A reques to amen e General aF 4, se _ p ran Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling unit #; per acre) to High Residential (24 -30 dwelling units per acne) for 5,.45 acres of land located an the south side of Base Line Road, west of Archibald - A.PH: 208 - 031 -18, 19, DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 87 -05 TAC DEVELOPMENT UORPOMU' - A request to amen, a the-Development Is r e s p from ow- Medius Residential (4-8 0i -suing units per acre) to High Residential (24 -30 dwe7lxis'4 units per acre) attached with the Senior Housing Overlay District (SHOD) to the base district for 5.05 acres of land located on the south side of Base Line Road, :rest of Archibald Avenue - APN: 208 - X031 -189 19. I. ABSTRACT: The applicant has subs— ed a development proposal under e n or Housing Overlay D14trict-_(SHttl3) of the DcXr'Wpment Code. The suWttAl package includes a request for a OevO opment Agreement, for a General Plan Amendment, for a Development 01s';;nict Amendment and an application for project approval of a 17U unit senior housing project or 5.5 gross acres of land and approval of a related project, of an adjacent $1.,150 square foot medical office building on 1. 69 gross acres of land. Because the General P"tan land use change from Low - Medium Density to Figh Density depends on the use of the site for Senior }lousing, approval of the Development Agreement must be concurrent with approval for the General Plan Amendment and Development nistrxt, Amendments. At this time the Development Agreement has not been finalized. Also, the project design ';id site plan are being reviewed. It is anticipated that the Peve opment Agreement and project review will be completed by October 'r8, 1987. Therefore, the Planning Commission is requested to hold a public hearing for preliminary review and comment on the entire package and to continue the public hearing to October 28, 1987 for final recommendation to the City Council. ITEM I ii PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 87 -048 t DDA 87 -05 - TAC DEVELOPMENT dORPORATION September 28,' 1987(. Page 2 I 1 II. BACKGROUND: The applia,A is requesting a General Plan Amendment, a eve opmrent District Amendment and approval of separate Applications for the send or apartment prtsject and ate office medical project, The applican%.As proposing to build affordable housing under the Senior Housing Overlay District (SHOD). Therefore, under the terms of the SHOD the applicant will enter into a Development Agreement with the City. The project proposed is for 170 units on j 5 <5 gross acres of land. III. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION ( Exhibit "A" and "C "): Applications I or an amen en o tne Land Use Map of e enera'l Plan and to the Development District Map have been ¢e in conjunction with a proposal for development of a senior ci ken project on the subject site and related medical offices an an adjacent site to the east. A. Action Reraested• The applicant requests approval of apps ca ons to Smend the Land Use Map of the General Plan and the Development Districts map from Low - Medium Density Residential to High Density Residential. B. Location: Base Line Road west of Archibald Avenue C. Parcel Size: 5.5 acres D. Surroundin Land Use and Zoning: or - Neign5ornood Cmimercial South - Vacant; Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) East - Neighborhood Commercial West - Single Family Residential; Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) _ E. General Plan Designations (Exhibit "B "): Project e- - Low-Medium ,es en a -8 dwelling units per acre) North - Neighborhood Commercial South - Lat Density Residential (2 -4 erwelling units per acre) East - Neighborhood Commercial and Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwe'iing units per acre) West - Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) F. Site Characteristics: The site, consisting of two parcels, slopes gra da y o e southeast. On one parcel there is an older- single family resinnce which has no historical or cultural significance and several sm &iler storage structures., The other parcel is vacant with a concentration of trees`' adjacent to Base Line Road. 4 }( PLANNING COWISSION STAFF REPORT f\ GPA'87- -046 & DDA 87 -05 - TAC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION a September 23, 1987 Page 3 IV. A4ALYSIS. A. DevelOPment Agreement Under the Senior dousing Overlay C MrM. Pu 7h* - -purpose:. 4P, the Sent ,sing Overlay Q is to provide affordable - housing for senior citizens 'in an area which has a character unique to the needs of senior citizens, including: o appropriate base district zonincj p location in an area which is generally quiet and free from health, safety or noise problems. o area _ infrastructure in.,, place. including streets, s dewalks and traffic signals. o site topography which is fairl,!c,leval. jo located near to commercial establishments, service providers and other,�enities. Location: The proposed location an Base Line Road near WFERTUff Avenue meets the above requirements. Services including food shopping, drug stores, banks and public transportation exist adjacept,to the site. An emergency rare medical facility axtsts ald -the applicant is proposing to cW--_tr19rt a medical nffict, building ~so that additional I medical and dental services may be provided. Recreational facilities may be reached' Y.- -bus or Van So transportation. The area is well suited to a senior project. An earlier SHOD prvlect, the Heritage Park Senior Apartments, is located on Lomita Court adjacent to the Neighborhood Cerciai Center to the north. Development Incentives: In order to achieve an attractive _cTa­TTy---s5—u-nT an senior project, the SHOD offers development incentives, including: a Reduction in required on -site parking to a minimum ratio of .7 non - covered spaces per unit; o Density bonus or increased land use density un0er the General Plah or both; and o Fee waivers and reductions. k PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 87 -04G A DDA 87 -05 - TAC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Septekber 23, 1987 Page 4 The applicant is requesting a change in the General Plan Land Use Map from Low - Medium Density (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to High Density (24 -30 dwelling units per acre). The applicant is also requesting a density banus to allow an overall density of 34'd welling units :�r acre. The applicant will provide one (1) aon- covered Iarking space per unit. The applicant is not requesting waiver of fees. Staff recommends entering Into a 30 year Development Agreement with the applicant under the terms of the SHOD for affordable housing for Senior Citizens. For purposes of the agreement target tenants are persons who are 55 years of age or older and whose household incomes do not exceed 80% of median income for San Bernardino County as defined by the - Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development. Two and four person household sizes are used respectively to calculate affordable rents for one and two bedroom apartment sizes. Staff recommends the following terms for the Development Agreement: o Approval of a three story 170 unit senior project. o Approval of the General Plan Land Use and Development District Amendments plus a density bonus to allow a density of 34 dwelling units per acre.. a Approval of one (1) parking space per unit, Based on the present availability of 344 existing units in two projects built under SHOD provisions using the two and four person household rental formula, the need for this price range senior apartment is close to being met. B. Existing and Proposed Land Use: The existing General Plan land Me es gna on s ow- dium Density single family residential. The Low - Medium Density designation provides a buffer between the Neighborhood Ccutmrercial and the adjacent single family residential neighborhood. With appropriate siting, landscape treatment and parking, a proposed senior project would continue to provide suca a buffer (Exhibit "D "). C. Density: Through the General Plan Amendment process; the appTi—ca—ft is requesting an increase in density from Low - Medium ROidentiai (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) to High Density R. sidential (24 -30 dwelling units per acre). Additionally, under the Development Agreement which will be required by the SHOD, the applicant is requesting a density bonus to allow an `2 l fie' PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT h GPA 87-04G & =D8A.87 Ora - TAC CEVELOP MM RENT CtlRPDi�tATI4N September 23., L98l Page S A. ;ultimate density of 34 dwe111ng units per acre. Density servo �s an indicator S� intensity of use. A `senior project As a N *r intensity Use _ than other multi- family residtnt+ial pri,jects,4 For exampl +e, in a senior project Cher ire typically of one perso a °p'''tdominance n households operating less then one autd�'pbile per- household. The result is a reduced demand on infraA�tructure and services-, in;refore the density,pf a senior proje44 will not s�tgnificantly -increase the intensity of Land use. V. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSES-$M _Ar: In preparing the Environmental �ssssmen , s a s requested that the applicant supply a traffic study. After the traffic information has been received and reviewed, an environmental determination will be made. VI. CORRESPONDENCE: -This item has been advertised,as a public hearing ' ;nwn rs y R'e ma ti newspaper, notices were sent to al l property owners w n Beet of the project site,, a.nd�,the property has been posed with a -4 x 8 supple,wintal notificati;An sign. f VII., RECOMMENDATION: Because the Development Agreement has not been na ze aoT the project design and site plan reviews have not been completed, staff recommends that the Planning commission review and 'comment on the application for a change in land use and increase in density for the purposes of providing a 170 unit senior housing project under the SHOD and continue the public hearing until October 28, 1987. Respectfully submitted, Be BB:MB :vc Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity /Land Use Exhibit "BN - General Plan Land Use Map Exhibit "C" - Development Districts Map ,Exhibit D - Site Plan Ij CITY OF ITF.%vlt RA� EHO CUCAM(�NCA TrrLE:AAaNmi-m"- PLANNING DIVISION EXH[Brr.-A, SCALE. \A4AHT CITY C OF RANHO CUCAMOINGA PLANNING DIVISM 4A ITEM: AM W^A * Tr LE. Am1ar l-4!�t 1�� EXHIBIT- —t — SCALE.- =,7 Dovolopmont Districts } i r^�-r i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAINijo iNGA PLANNING DjvlSK) �y �AS�LIi�IE r� fir"'' NORTH TITLE =.. EXHIBIT, __, ,,p SCALE. ARCHIBALD ' it•J : }•. I 'RJ! \} }fa ♦Y ♦ff r` �e }eR }4 rrP•s� {� � J J• ♦•J lrr � Jr'YJJS ►e !Y ♦ :,y .af•�af• i s J'• J•sMf JS }Pr } • Gonaral ♦ : ! f A r • r Plan • • • } } } } .+ a • � } 1 � ! � ste ! v e� ffM ' I► V ve ` t4tf ar • } f aaa a BASELINE r �w • � t 1.a 1;A1•et •.♦ � a } r } ♦ i �f ea:��t +f`�a �'e •�• R raa'•ra PtatP Pwr •r�tPw � e• }• et P r• ri• � a• P� R •• a` r• t 1 w r f r a w a:n � se P••ar�}�t�t for tt }a P•• ••Prwr r'f } }ReaariPe• � tewata is }• ♦. •P •t•P• `• saaa� , e }. .. ••• y r P+ a f►• a site. �w�r�e�•�a� a}rr••w ♦►tear• I aatat•aawrrta e} a..} ' }aver•}eta a w.rR a }rr••.•Pr f•�w •cta`P }• alaar••rtrir Y.t I s•t . fr•ef ••s ara•aara.rrr•t♦ Dovolopmont Districts } i r^�-r i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAINijo iNGA PLANNING DjvlSK) �y �AS�LIi�IE r� fir"'' NORTH TITLE =.. EXHIBIT, __, ,,p SCALE. 4 MA" r, w s r 1 `I MCAI, rplaww.7 V -Cl+1 Lrr� ary CF rrEM. �` `, *Odd 67- S CITY OF RAW! HO q- T�CAMONGA STAFV Rk1- MT AA1E: September,,23,`1987 TO: Chairman, od Members of the Planning Commissior xr.as�. f �+ FROM: Brad Bulks•; City Planner BY: Miki Bracts Asst- ctacit Planrw SUWECT' EWIRDWENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GEl9ERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 87 -,04H - - . equest.to amend the Land Use map of ie enera 'ician`Trom Low - Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Office for 1.,49 acres of land located on the west aiue of Archibald Avenue, South of Base Line Road APN: 208 - 031 -17, 54, 55, 56, and 57. ENVIRONMENTAL- ASSESSMENT ..;sAND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT iENDME'AT Wn-M - IM tfE9ktt F`= A request to amen e eve opmen s r c p rom ow- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Office Professionci for 1.69 acres of land, locates" on the crest side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road - APR: 208- Q31717, 54, $5, 56 and 57. I. ABSTRACT: The applicant is requesting a General Plan Amendment and zone change on 1.699 gross acres of land in order to build an 8,50 square foot medfcal office building :zs part of a development package submitted .ader the Senior Housing Overlay District (SHOD) of the Development Cods. The pQ'kage also includes the proposed 170 unit, three stofy' senior apart ent complex, as *411 as a General Plan Amendment ins zone chelfile .w 5.5-grros, 'Icrus of land needed for the housing project and e nevelopment __;�eement. At this meeting the Planning Commission `t:• requested to oeview and comment on the office component of the package and to continue the public hearing to October 28, 1987 for Planning Commission recomme)Wations to the City Council. II. BACKGROUND: This General Plan Amendment and Development District ; en n were initiated by TAC Development Corporation. -he property is br ended on the north and east by commercial deve% nt and on the sottlh by a church. The senior citizen housing project to be teveloped ;:rider the Senior Housing Overlay District (SHOO) is proposed on the west. Because the availability of medical services I,-- 'a SHOD go ;",, the appl'-.ant is proposing to build a medical office project �t this location adjacint to the senior or ,",jest. ITEM J , PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 87 -04H A DDA 87 -06 - TAC DEVELOPMENT Seitember 23, 1987 Page 2 III. PROJECY'AND SITE DESCRIPTION: Applications for an amendment to the Land se map or e Geiieral Plan and to the Development Dt�trict Map have been made in conjunction with a proposal for development of a medical uffice project or the subject site and a senior citizen project on an adjacent site to the west. A. Action Requested: The applicant requests approval of applications o amend the land. Use Map of the Genera: Plan and the Development Districts map from Low- 14edium f -nsity Residential to Office Professional. B. Location: Archibald Avenue south of Base Line Road C. parcel Size: 1.69 acres D. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning (Exhibit "A" and "C"): or _ ommerc a,; eigWbo' n000d'I;twerclala South - Church; Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling :nits per.acre) East - Commercla7 and Single Family Residential; Neighborhood Crmmercia_and Low Density Residential _ (2 -4 dwelling i�.tcs pei^ acre) West - Vacant and Christmas Tree Farm; Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) E. General Plan Designations (Exhibit "B "1: rroject site LOW-Medt -UIN es en a -8 dwelling units per acre) North - Neighborhood Commercial South - Low Density 'Residential (2 -4 dim :ling units per acre) East - Neighborhood C=*rc ;al and Low Gmnsivy Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) West - Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) F. Site Characteristics: The topography of the site slopes gently u e sou �eas;'," Raving about a. 3% grade. Three s4ilgle family residences with detached garages now occupy part of the site. These existing dw+ellin;�s would becaiee non�•con €orming uses with adoption of the amendmeits. These units would be scheduled for demolition with development of the medical office site. One residence has a built -fin swimming pool. The souther.y portion of the site is used for a Christmas —ee farm. IV. ANALYSIS: A. Comparison of Existing acid roaosed Land Use: The applicant requests a 2 rz.s't"Tann Mendment, and' zone change from Low - Medium Residential designation to Offica Professional designation on 1.69 c -res of land. The applicant has also submitted plans for project approval of a 8,150 square foot medical office building (Exhibit "D"). RM %� AN!lINi3 COMAISSION STAFF REPORT &P�1 87 -O4i3 l€ D13A 37 -06 - TAC DEVELOPiiENT September 23, 19$7 Rge 3 u ` The present Low - Medium Residential land use designation sat es as,,a buffer between the single family residential neighborhood intersectiontof Archibald Avenue l and Base LinecRoad tb the F.; north. The proposed Office Professional use ould also function as a similar buffer provided the site would be designed sentitive 7:0 the issues of setbacks, parking/ circulation, landscaping, and building design to ensure that the medical— office use would he Compatible with adjacent residential ttsrs. The chur;h directly south of th* property is within the Low Density Residential zone and alsf;'cunctiun3 as part of 'the Medium inter. ity lVrid use buffer xani,. B. Circulations As part of the R,tsironmental review, the WPM ca was rkeii to submit atwF.4�onal information about `traffic which ri11 be generated by the project. This information ils not yet been received. V. *- KVIRO} 1T, . 1k-S, SSt RT: In preparing an -environmental ssessmen , spa, as requested that the developer prepare a traffic stC.`' +, At. er the traffic infC-rftt'.on is received and re.iewed, an- invironaental detA minati ,_ , Ap• 0:11 be madc. VI. CORZ; ;r NDEHCE• Phis.\ }item has bt%r, advertised as a public hearing In , e '�" -'fie ort newspaper, notices wsoe stint to ill property owners w eat of the prase site and the property has been posted with a 4' x 8' supplemenfir,,iiotific ) tion sign. VI.. RECOFMEMDATIOM; Staff recOW*mus that "tt planning Commission Fe anZT comment on the 0�flce compdnent of the applicant's propval to build a senior citizai�-- Iroject under the Senior Housing Overlay Distri :t of the Dov-0 ±pme;�,` Code and continue the publ t, hearing t4 October 28, 1987. Resp l V-SubRitted, ra 1 r City PI ner BB: Ms: vc Attachments; Exhibit "A" - Vicini!y gap Exhib �. "s" . Fxisting Land llsz_ Exhibit "C" - existing General plan /Zoning F- xhiblt "D" ,, Site plan M T-3 Elm 1`tT4-I CITY OF FIA F+INdI G I VY FXHI13i.`:. SCALE.-- A PAAir- � Iomher �t +TtrIg- NOUH cif'`?,, ITEM. RANCW jGA Tnu. PLANNING DIVOW EXHIBM-P, ARCHIBALD !• °w° !r°!! ala ••�� e a �e! rs••ew i••f -'�� °rele4 s ••!.•nar. reralr!•e• � •!•• asnsral Plao..ie:•i •uhf °•° e•••••••w.e �� •• a a; ••••re • f e f w • e p r a±* •ai•O• 74 �.o• rrir �. O.:E • • r ; r • •r••! !ri i • 3 BA34FLINE - s 4• s a r e• f r• e • j•= •se•f ►saas• �•,++. •ri a k'a - r••r!1!•wr• • -�' ••.rf r• ;.gyp\ •a � rir••. rlfr•• �;! • • se•r r• � u••r•ra a. { r r t• f a! ! • it !il �e�r •�. ;RZ•' a!•• }err :i a• •rover• !%r• ••saaf a •w!s•e! as •eri�T••nr ryea• -af •rr ems• Y�•.1 rr•• wsVr ®'`i •:1 e• a e• e f r . e0.... e.• e r a. u r r °• • •••••••.r• rrr• wr � ! i •+9 j Da slopmont i °.ASELINE _ f r r d • f -f I •.• -„� rr-, r :. .I. f RA NCR) C.UCANION" A T!I'E.E =04 r- .01-ANNi.NG, ©wisi N EXMIBCT: SCALE=--- b ---- -- 9� 1 56HIML. V ei,Cfr6r, E �; GL'M M,°� m 6 • t' rlOPWA4/ ofof'4 87•Q+ 1+ VORTH .� rrEVz. Pi.A►.'�:til:�d� DRIWN EX) ,�T: SCALE: 13 ill I. ABSTRACT: This is an administrative action necessitated by the adoption of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan to change the Development Districts Map for the properties within the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan area from the existing ,'esignations to Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (F.S.P.). The Planning Commission will review, take public testim)ny, and consider staff's recommendation on the matter. SW f recommends approval of the Development District Amendment. II. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: The proposed development district changes are actions necessary due to the adoption of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (see Resolution, Ehibit The Development District Amendment will change the designation to Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (F.S.P ) for properties within the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan area. III. E6vIR0R4ENTAL PETERMINATICN: Ttis action provides for the slim? ntt o ex Zoning provisions and adoption of the Development District cesignatior. "F.S.P," for those properties regulated by the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, The land use impacts of the Specific Plan have been adequately addressed in the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment 87 -03B Environmental Impact Report as certified on September 18, 1987. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Should the Commission, upon examination of the subject eve opmen District Amendment'., decide that the changes would promote the land use goals and poicies of the General Plan, would not cause significant adverse environmental impacts,, the following finding-,,are necessary for approval. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT a O ^ F Z DATE: September 23, 1987 19771 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FRG N: Brad Buller, City Planner e7: Cy^rthia Kinser, Assistant Platjner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 4ND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT - - AD CUC A - n amen en o change a Development s r c designations from the existing designations to Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (F.S.P.) for all properties adjacent to Foothill Boulevard from Grove Avenue to Deer Creek Channel and from the I -15 Freeway to East Avenue within the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan area. I. ABSTRACT: This is an administrative action necessitated by the adoption of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan to change the Development Districts Map for the properties within the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan area from the existing ,'esignations to Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (F.S.P.). The Planning Commission will review, take public testim)ny, and consider staff's recommendation on the matter. SW f recommends approval of the Development District Amendment. II. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: The proposed development district changes are actions necessary due to the adoption of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (see Resolution, Ehibit The Development District Amendment will change the designation to Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (F.S.P ) for properties within the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan area. III. E6vIR0R4ENTAL PETERMINATICN: Ttis action provides for the slim? ntt o ex Zoning provisions and adoption of the Development District cesignatior. "F.S.P," for those properties regulated by the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, The land use impacts of the Specific Plan have been adequately addressed in the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment 87 -03B Environmental Impact Report as certified on September 18, 1987. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Should the Commission, upon examination of the subject eve opmen District Amendment'., decide that the changes would promote the land use goals and poicies of the General Plan, would not cause significant adverse environmental impacts,, the following finding-,,are necessary for approval. w r� yfft y1p st hnn u , p1.A141♦lOFSS M �AFl: REPOR'" ODA, 87 D9 city,r' Rancho Cucamonga Septe*Or 23, a € \, Page 2 'I A. The Amendments do )ot conflict with the Lend Use Policies of iha.,8eneral. Plan; ' and a 8, The Amendments do promote goals of the Land Use Element f and CD the Amendments would not -be materially injurious or detrimenta7 to the adjacent prc- ,.xrties; and D., That the subject properties are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed f!istrict in te.nas of access, size, and compatibility with existing land usF4 in the i^o surunding areas. IV. RECGMENDAI'I ':,' „Staff rerommends the"Planning Commission reco nd ;! approvaY""-R— Reitivpwnt l istricts Amendmeet 87 -09 to the City Council by the sdoptior, of the attached draft Resolution. ,J 4Respfu7ly submitted, 64 r' ` city, i= annex BB:Ci :vc Attachments: )raft RestA ution of Apprival 1y Ilk WWEREAS, on the 10th dakk of September, 1987 a" application Was filed and acceptod on the Dove- ,described protect; and WHEREAS, on tte 27,rr► day of September, 1987•, the Planning Commission held a duly advert >sed pub-i,lz hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Cade. L4_,'TION 1: The Raraho Cucamonga', Planning 40mmiO,i .on has a~ade the s0110ti1ng Tindinngs: 1. 711at the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted ist the proposed district in terms of access, size, and c�wpatibility with existing land use in the Surrounding area; and 2. That the proposed district change would not have sig0ficant impact on the environment nor the Surrounding properties; and 3. That *he proposed district change is in conformance with the General Plan. SECTION ': This Commissior. hereby find:; that the project has been revanvsed a-`nnd con"s"idered in cempiiance with Oe California Environmental Qa31ity Act of 1970 by Vie certification of the Foothill Boaleva-4 Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment 87 -030 Environmental Impact Report as certi €iqd on September 16, 1987, NOH, THEREFORE, BE T RESOLVED; 1. That pursuant tc Section 558..10 to 85855 of the Ca'iifornia Goverment Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommi nds'approval on tht. 23rd day of September 1487, District Amendment No. 87-009. REaOLtiTIO�i,� 1I0. 0 A PcSOLUiION Or,,79E RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNIw cOMMISSIOW RECOMMEN^ ING APPROVAL of DEVELOPMENT OISTr;1fT AME40MENT NO. B7 -03, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE DE- I&OPMENT DISTRICT MAP "GC" FROM THE EXISTING ;GENERX GOWIMERCIAL), "op (OFFICE/ PROFESSIONAL), "M" (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENT�Fl), "FC" - (FLOOD CONTROL), "ISP" (INDUSTRIAL ARLA SPEb::rIC "ESP" +'LAN), 010 (ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT) To "FSP" (FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PAM) FoIZ;,%o ACRES,vr T ? LAND iSEE EXH!BIT" "A ") 1'MACENT.?`.o FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN G904t AVENUE AND DEER CkEgK CHANNEL AND BETWEEN THE I -15 FREEWAY AND BAST AVENUE WITHIN THE FOOTRI11 BOU.EVARO SPECIFIv PLAN WWEREAS, on the 10th dakk of September, 1987 a" application Was filed and acceptod on the Dove- ,described protect; and WHEREAS, on tte 27,rr► day of September, 1987•, the Planning Commission held a duly advert >sed pub-i,lz hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Cade. L4_,'TION 1: The Raraho Cucamonga', Planning 40mmiO,i .on has a~ade the s0110ti1ng Tindinngs: 1. 711at the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted ist the proposed district in terms of access, size, and c�wpatibility with existing land use in the Surrounding area; and 2. That the proposed district change would not have sig0ficant impact on the environment nor the Surrounding properties; and 3. That *he proposed district change is in conformance with the General Plan. SECTION ': This Commissior. hereby find:; that the project has been revanvsed a-`nnd con"s"idered in cempiiance with Oe California Environmental Qa31ity Act of 1970 by Vie certification of the Foothill Boaleva-4 Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment 87 -030 Environmental Impact Report as certi €iqd on September 16, 1987, NOH, THEREFORE, BE T RESOLVED; 1. That pursuant tc Section 558..10 to 85855 of the Ca'iifornia Goverment Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommi nds'approval on tht. 23rd day of September 1487, District Amendment No. 87-009. PLANNING COI ' �SS'IOWR MWTION NO. OUA 87 -09 - Ci of Rambo Cucamonga September 23, �S7 Page 2 2. The Planning Com!oission hereby recommends -that the City Council approve and adopt District Aeendaent No. 87 -09, as described to -:the ,title and indicated in the attached Exhibit ;aA ".`' 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related, material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD „DAY OF SEPT04BER, 1987. PLANNING C"ISSION OFT-HE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Larry T. e , Cbairman A?'TEST; Brad Buller, D eputy” ecreFalry '"`°� I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Coomission of t r ty of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly intraduced, passed, and adopted by the :Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Pl-anning CoiWsslon held or the 23rd day of September,, 1987, by the; following vote- to -witt AYES: COWISSIONERS: HOES., COMISSIONEM. ABS'LaT: COtfi!ISSIONERS' Q rF "T w CL t2 pub us fA' .w V 1 F GROVE VIPSYARD ARCHIBALD HAVEN ti EMANDA EAST v 8 m x wt 0 lost a E --- - — CITY of; -tANc1 C1 CUC.414IomA STAFF REPORT 1,977 DATE: September 23, 1987 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Coxwission FRC4: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: ,- .Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIROKMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -14 e eve opmen o, W - am' y units — M=icres of land in the Medium Residential District (844 dwelling unfits per acre), located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Baker Avenue - APN 207 - 201 -30, 41,, 42 and 43. Associated with the development is Tree Removal P °rmit 83 -62 requesting the removal, of a number of trees scattered throughout the site. E+IROW4ENTAL`,A3SESSMt,NT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13650 - GREENVIEW EST] sideRlal SuBdIvIsion and design review or ownhome units on 10.15 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-1+4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Baker Avenue - APN 41, 42 and 43. Associated with the developnen >: is Tree Removal Permit 87 -62 requesting the removal of a number of trues scar tiered throughput the site. I� PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Artien Requested: Approval of subdivisioir snap, site plan, building elevatiOnS, Tree Removal Permit, an% issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Project Density: 13.8 dwelling units per acre. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North Railroad; General ri,ial South - Mobile Home Park; Low - Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) East Mobile Home Pant, Low - Medium Residential, (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) West - Tow.lhomes, Medium Residential (8-14 dvkltl ing units per acre) ITEM L PLAXmrmd C"ISSION STAFF REPORT DR 87- 14fTT13C5O - GREENYIEW ESTATES Seytember 23, 1987 Page 2 1 j i D. Genera? Plan Designation,,, Project Sf e e xuca es dential (8-14 dwelling units per Narth�` - Co�ere a � I South - Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwveiling units per acre) East - Low - Medium Reei;entiat (4-8 dwelling units per acre) WPSt - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) E. Site Charactkristics: The site slopes generally from northwest afro— sou ens a approximately 3 percent. There is a g,ade di:ferentiat between the site and Foothill Boulevard varying from' 3 feet to 12 fee, in height. An existing sil;gse family coe and several small accessory buildings occupy thr site. Surrounding the house is a small citrus orchard and several ; large trees of various sines and ,species. The remaining po,'tion is covered with native shrubs and grasses. F. Parking Calcuiatior4: Number of Number of Type Spaces Spaces of Use Reguired_ Provided Two Bedroom: Covered 82 82 Open 84 ,Es Three Bedroom: Covered 58 118 Open 58 p Guest 35 61 Total 299 325 II, ANALYSIS: A. General; The applicant is proposing to devIlop the site with T4iawn`iaorne units. the units w3rl consist of tiro and three bedroom units r ?ngirrg in size fYbs 538 so ytare fee: to 1,395 square feet in `area. The three- bedroom units wilt have 'an ` attachei two -scar rarage. The two - bedroom units will slave an attached one -car garage. ;.pities for the project include a recre&'4won btilding, ,a pool, two spas, two tot lots and f -3ur barbecut; areas, ` PLAHNING,COMMISSIOU STAFF REPORT DR 87- 141TT13�150 -- -,MkEENVIEW ESTATES SAS te*ber 23, 19% a Page 3 • , d. Desi�lin' Review Committee: The Committee (Emerick, Blakesley, rou"') originally reviewed the project on duly 2, 1987, and made the following recommendations; = 1. The coirrete araas around the pool area should be minfmized to provide more green space area. (, L. The sidewalk along Foothill Boulevard should 'I.?/ wander. ,I 3. All, retaining wiklls should have d(torafive tr /�atmznt, r 4. Additional architectural detailing should -bow -: ti provided around all windows. 5. Variation should be provided in the design i/f F- garage doors. i 6. A standard design should be provided for the patios on the ground floor. 7. Additional relief should be provided i1n all r elevations fronting Foothill Boulevard.\' The F .relief should include architectural detailing or E the use of landscape materials. k 8. Special accent landscaping should be provided at all project entries ar.-I at the corner of Foothill Boulevard and Baker Street. 9. Special landscaping consistent with the Foothill - Boulevard Specific Pld.s shot\$ be provided along Foothill Boulevard. 10. landscaping should be provided throughout the j2te to create a unifying theme. 11. ,The grading plan should be redesigned to provide an additional 5 foot level area adjacent b) Foothill Boulevard. The revised plans should be �- reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee prior to scheduling the project for the c Planning Commission. �I'i PLANING COWSSION STAFF REPOR DR 87- 14fTT13658 - 6RE"VIEW ESTATES „ Septemter 23, 1987 Page 4 Following the iesign Revfsw Committee meeting, the aplirant revised th-- site plan to address the Commi#tee'r concerns.- New plans mre su''''aitted and reviewed by the Cbroittee on August 6, 1987. TK,k- rVbmnittee approved the revised plans subject o the following, conditions; 1. Eliminate narking space numbers 74_ 81, 22 and 83. 2. Shift Building 11 -4 south to provide a WON= 18 foot landscaped area between the building and the ;.parking spaces to the north. 3. Relocate the trash enclosure at the southwest corner or the site to eliminate visibil ;ty 0� &R Baker Avenue, C. Technical Review Committee: The, Technical Review Cotarittee viewea"tne propossal on ' 3fine 30, 1987 and, aside f lox the usual discussions of undergrounding utilitt* , felt that the only area left unresolved wt..� the proposed drainaij, of the site. The applicant is proposing to drain the trac,p to the east and, as a result, requires an off -site private drainage easement to an acceptable disposal area as determined by the City Engireer. The developer pvesently has a drainage easement through the mobile .home park, but needs an additional drainage easement from the eobile how. park to Arrow Route or Cucamonga Creek Channel. The developer imas been working the land owner to obtain the necessary a &i3ement but Nas not completed the transaction. The Subdivision Map Act would require the City tc TIM'nftai the property necessary to install the required drainage facility if the developer is unable tc% obtain t}ic easements. Failure of the City to coidemn tb obtain the easement woul null and void that coo4ition; hence, would result in a pro:,-;t that did not have prG,per drainage. The Planning Commission, however, does not have tie authority to comit the City to condemnation proceedings. ;` The City t-ou.4il should approve the condemnation 'in woncept "- prior to approving the proposed tract. 1:krefore, staff recommends That the Planning Commission continue this itea to the meeting of October 14, 1967. By doing so, the issue of condemns; ion will p be presented to the C ;';,v Council on October 7, ,k%7 frr l direction. If the Councti is acceptable to i� w possihi��,li�ty of condemnation, the item will be brought tick +Go the Punning Commission for further review. If tNa Cotimil , %.oes root wish to pursue condemnatiot: the Planning Commission could allow the PLAMW�W;, COWISSIm STAFF RET DR - O WERVIEW EPORSTATES Septafter 23, 1987 Page 5 applicant to continue this Item for thirty (30) days until the drai "ag! easement can be obtained at, the Planning Comission Could 460Y the project due to 'nsu"icieft drainage facilities. D. Tree Removal Permit: In onjunctior with the proposed ?pmev�f� �#O rcanf-,,-Nas submitted a Tree Removal pemit for the Proposed removal of 26 assorted SPOOes Of trees. Ar arborist s report has been submitted to address-'the Condition of the trees. Based on the, MorMendations of the report, there are five trees worthy of preservatic,,I. Thr%u of the fits trees, however, aVe l0t:ated in areas Proposed for structures or drive aisles. The other two trees, 4 California buckeye and a Brazilian pepper, could be preserved depending on the alfrq me nt of the sidewalk along, Baker Avenue. If the sidewalk was located adjacent to the --urb, sufficient arei would be provided to allow the trees to r=afn in their pres-,-ot location. if .Ie si4eWfilk is to be 10-.Atted Adjacent t9 the right-of-way line, thereby providing a parkway area, the trees would have to be removed. In reviewing the current sidewal k ' aliq noents in the area, Staf, notes that there are no existing sidowalks located on f,,,! project side of Baker Avenue south of the site. On the West side of Baker Avenues there IS a wr�ndering sidewalk across from the southern pirtim sidewalk adjacent to the .,. rl-� , of the rite-and a straight at the inters6qjon of Baker Ave"nuo and Foothill aoufe�L, - Ste-If vecr;�, „,ts that the d'a'ng Commission Provide- -fraction as U. Me future �,,.:)sftion of the trees. In regards to the remaining trees on th , 'lot, staff r,commeids that thi►y be: removed and replaced with MatV?* trees ds requie,d by the Tree Preservation Ordfnance, E. Environmental Assessment, The applicant has completed Part I Of . -rffRT-r-SW— Staff has c(opleted Part 11 of Lim rrtW' 11% antal Checklist and has determined that the site falls W, tL!'F� the Red Hill Fault Special Studies area. As a result, the applicant has Provided A geotechnic report to determine if Vh!!� Red 14,11 Fault is located within thL., proje,7t site. After C-� uattaq the trench that traverses the SfU, Inc evidence of fc.�A'tinq was found within the project site. )refore, an active fatift -ine is not known to b�,-present within this sitt- which world necessitate additional builVq Therefore Staff recmimendi that a Negative he,larationIbe issued foe ;his pro.4, ,It. III, "CTS FOR The project is zonsistent.,wjth the General L.vej� eo en'; Code. IIA2 projec” w the PU471C h alth not be detrimental to r safety, or cause nuisances or significant adverse environm2ntal imPdrtS. Adequate drainage, bomqver, bas not 0701 --02- o 9-23-87-PC Agenda a r t; l' F- PLANNING'COWIS.SIOW,,STAFF REPORT" M 87-14MIUM -- GRERRVIEW ESTATES Septembev 11., 1987 Page fi been provided for trio site. As a result, ,the proposal is not in compliance with provisions of the provisions of the Bevelopmant Code and City standards and policies. IV. CORRESPOKOENCEi This item has been advertises -as a public hearing 3n the "�, "R' pe ort newspaper and notices have been sent to all property owners ,;cfiin 300 feet of the site. V. RECOMMEWATION: Staff recoumends that the Planning Commission canTct- a p-°lWc hearing to receive all public input and testimony on the proposed development. After receiving all input, staff recommends that the Planning 4omsission continue this item to the October 14, 1967 meeting. The applicant has submitted a letter agreeing to the continuance. Res fully su fitted, Brad Paanner r City ' BB•SM:te Attachments: Letter from Applicant/ 4.-e& September 18, 1987 ExhlOt "A" - Locatiw! NO Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Building Elevations II Q IM LAM AND' ASSOCIATE s .m�G�taT�TUtaE ANC: PLANNING 39 \ \f . 229 C &T^ Ai'pk omrv. 1M . . " . oaTe: Septemh 16, 1987 —Gii%fl— I CrfY N wit Planning Department rJIpE^{tigjpY City of Rane ,D Cucamonga i 9320 "Cx Baseline - -Road Rancho Cucanla;nga, _CA/'91741 -Attn: Mr. Scott Murphy 4 Project: Greenview Estate iownhome %r i Foothill Blvd b Baker Ave Ref: Continue Planning Commissiorr Public Hearing �7 through October 14th, 1987 Dear Air. Murphy': Due to the' complication of the blanket easement at the ad- jacent proper;,y, I agree with you to "continue the Planning 11 Commission public hearing from September 23, 1587 through I A October 14.1 1987. Thank you fgr,your, recommendation and cooperation. i ncerei yo'itrs, anching Lam AIA Architect ML /lsc t. c. Dr. K:, . Chen Dr. J. Huang op Fe 1 d4- 7�1i 1 t FCi? M� TUN!H I L •��:� tom: x •, . MAWw IL -t PLANNING DIVISION E.1f {t�tT'r.���-SCAU.. CITYOF RANCHO CLC,�,Nj ? PLA NVs 1-NISM CTE.%l- TITLE, EXHIBIT= SC:ALh- l a [A T RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO GUC.4MUNGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 87 -14 FOR THE DLVELOPMENT OF 140 MULTI- FAMILY UNITS,ON 10.15 ACRES J� LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL PAULEVARD AND BAKER AV%NUE IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT - APN: 207 - 20130, 41, 42 AND 43 A. Recitals. (i) Greenview Estates Development has filed an application for the approval of Development Review No. 87 -14 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subiect Development Review request is referred to as "the application ". (iii) On the of 23rd of September, 1987, the Pbnning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All Tegal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution havo occurred. B. Resolution. NOWT, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Conmission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission here'hy specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the ,above- referenced public heari -,g on September 23, 1987, including written and oral staff reports, toge,her with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Baker Avenue with a street frontage of 648.82 f tt along Foothill Boulevard and lot depth of 837.55 feet and is presently i-aprnved with a single family residence and accessory structures; and o) The property to the south, east and west are designated for residential uses. The property to the south and east is developed with a mobile home park and the property to the west is developed with a townhome compl ex. (c) The property, with the recommended conditions of approval, comply with aril minimum development standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (d) The development of 140 multi - family units is consistent with the Medium Residertial land use designation of the General Plan. 13 PLANNING CMSSION RESOLUTION ND. DR 87 -14 - CREENVIEW ESTATES DEVELOP14ENT September 23, 1987 Vage 2 f 3. Based upon thi substantial evidence presented to 'this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth °ln paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereb finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and (b) That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and (cl 'fiat the proposed use is ir%, compliance with each of the applicable pravi ;ions otJ �e Development Code; and (d' That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to tine public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in thf,,vicinity. a This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of li /a nWj, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration., 5. 1, 2 and 3 above,dthisnCommi siogfindings ereby approves oothe applioationnsubjectato each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division: (3) The following items shall be incor.,orated into the final landscape plan which shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits: 1. The sidewalk alone Foothill Boulevard shall meander. 2. Special accent landscaping shall be provided at the project entries and at the corner of Foothill Boulevard and Baker Avenue. 3. Landscaping consistent with the Foothill Specific Plan shall be provided alone. '.-,othiii Boulevard, PLANNING COMISSI'4N RESOLUTION Nil. ` OR 87 -14 - GREERVIMI CSTATE5 DEVELt PMEXT 1' September 23, 1987 � Page 3 4� Landscaping shall be provided throughout the site to create a unifying,theme. (b) Variation shall be provided in the garage door design, subjcct to review and approval by thy►, City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. i e ' Additional architectura; detailing shall be proided around all windows. The revised plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to thtk issuance of building permits,. (d) Additional relief shall be provided on all elevations fronting Foothill Boulevard. The relief shall be in the form of architectural detailing or landscape mater i o� , __: __ subject -to review and approval by the City Plannef.,;- (e) Parking space Twbers 74 and 81 shall be eltxirnated,,and replaced with landscaping. (f) Parkixtg space numbers 82 and 83 shall be eliminated anc ' suildi%g IT -4 shall be shifted south to provide a minimum ten'-foot landscaped area between the building and the parking stalls to the north. The revised plans shall be +,:,dewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. (g) The trash enclosure at the southwest corner of the site shall be relocated oot of public view from Baker Avenue subject to review and approval by the City �anner. (h) The California buckeye and Brazilian pepper trees, identified as letters "O" and "M" respectively, shall be preserved unless evidence is provided to the City Planner that to do so would create a severe hardship on the development of the site. Guidelines outlined in the arborist`s report for protection during construction and trimming following construction shall be adhered to. (i) Trees to be revved shall be replaced with specimen size trees and shJ1 be incorporated into the final landscape plan which shall be reviewed and appxr.�3 by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. PLANTING COMMISSION R£SO&(TION NO. j OR 87 -14 - GREENVIEW ESTAUl5,DEVELOPMENT September 23, 1987 Page 4 Engineering Division: (a) The existing overhead l Vtilities (telecommunications_ and electrical) on the project side of Baker Avenue shalt be undergrounded from the first pole offsite south of the project's south boundary to the terminus pole on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, prior to public improvement or occupancy, whichever occurs first. Reimbursement of one - half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from sliture development as it occurs on the opposite side of the street is not feasible bezause the property is presently developed. (b) A private stovm drain system shall be constructed from this proposed project to an approved disposal site within a private drainage easement to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Building Official. (c) Offsite drainage facilities shall be designed and related easements obtained necessary to convey flows from the development town acceptable disposal location as approved by the City Engineer and Building Official prior to issuance of any permits (foundation, grading, building, etc.) for the project. Construction of th* -facilities shall be completed prior to the occupancy or- any of the buildings. 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY 'OF SEPTEMBER, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY 9F RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry . RENIel, Chaff---man ATTEST: Brad Buller, epu y ecre ary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that ti;se foregoing Resolution was duly an regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of th City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular Aeetirg of the Plannlnc Commission del on the 23rd day of September, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: L__1 _ ai M $iyypN 40ru i CCOti wb �M�wO "��`,�O �CPar3y - y +pp L/ YL V A M N N V Yy♦ M a p i� Q Y. 4 p �� v O vp Ntii 35Q����ia�`L��� ao4C$GpIYS �aef.y�. !�•'��w�' �,u.NC jj{{���i��ap "'w{O"' JY ^�Y, yyyVYO YhiaC.w tl�i I % > 4 V N fit" M C w + nVB gyxm Walt ilps y�Q Ms 3w _ w pYYN A L,_p alMyay~i 6�+ �W ! ♦!� �nY}. ■ C� b C�idV� NCys1�rttyt NNE yQ�i pu O�tMSG �� �K,� Y��'M9 V+N�� M~ Y llfiii g i.. • Y _ 3 agr �e G = L 4 Usu � w� 6 i » �,• V C� Y p u Y" Y O i� s� C ga C>j�i'Lx��i = 17 ^I' G ' • pis iYi « L p g =,py.rj +��.�q� +ar�4 _>�a � �eQi•�� '�j�r+.��� `per �C � V � a�i.. � 4 Reif Nr.Qxp ^�y RiLQ *wi y i sis gl'�+TS SR Ii ���"•r =. Y j�J. � � pA wAN L Iyy�iy4� i �wi ,}7�1•� e�4 iY GI Yy* C~ � •^ $jCyal Ly�O pN WV W'M Ali �MiCQ j•.. ~V .r. ■NN +aY itr iN•��w. �4{{KC �N A ~w 6 4p ^ y2u IT yrn� •v, nv1 _+,°.* rN. yv y� 'fix � 1.yC��fyh� Apr +y�i CA N Ii I A, MW 6�li V Y Y Ki • OM t Y Y ;s 1 im q� v �T �'u�y ya� Qvw. st �rM �� � 4� ��� Y YYC N +1..C4 �•Lt frw 44. F'i>A .+.Y� Y "TiC�! N�w �ti♦ ��Y�L dMw� dJZ�w +ru it ,� p44 N.�t. r'°,. � IL L:!� V'i w�Yps ~I� yyy�L.M F re a AN Faa� ySy.+'� ;�� �'� ws�S °u �'� '{fir r' � `•a�eo M��3 «y. M- 6- �r � Y 1��y� 1p�1� pew. Y�■ V�w ■ >yMN V�N O'C K4t ~ »_rpm i pu yCp C �w tl..p. L 3 -11. e S♦ ~ pQ w.IL a i+ 1-1 Mi IN S 01. cm tzgi isle K }. 6 L 06 w , $' ;, rig a`4w a • cY` �r.W �d C6 YC tywaF V Ytili4 MLj j�•ll X_ x 4J�Q Oa� , Ly )• y�j� ��� �S.j• � '�, S�9H � I'3 ���r,.� • �Q�'M �l1a �O�Y�� g` « o"••VC ta�i.b l ♦Y`� 4V iMl '�w � {`� � Q a 10- �pp paNYS• pw•M Tpi� �O'{! ,G� YV � , �uML4` }A"�� �a {~Mp�•�C4VK.1 rL S},, C_ O ` � L�lgr N L`+s q/KP �+•• L IILrr � L w� � ,K�'' ��.i~g4." j 0JY[''6 J• Vey O �.y +Y fT� -11 E QC00t?E�NL N n. � W �� V � � 6 3 a ~ a ^� a W�� C^ T. G Y� y y t ■1F Y y$ .Y+EI W ega+a. Y�1 C ttYN yy ��.1.. Ytp TYY^ LLy �gj N°� : •p3v,e., ■ � y WL C � �� +N +`¢. � _ u4 �°''' a*L-'.y�g4 °„ -eYy'� '��w�rNx• s° �N$� .L qqa` u 0 1xY '9� hat yN C� arC �i. OIV L V4 ao. 103`t .'I Sli m6*�C a C i NX ,�µ s O yibitl- �fl'fT�Yq WY..,. YC.W wx{ pO 1y a w C {� p _ yt~,. ,� MLY' M�teL AW OM ^u00� ~O1 sµ ....gy°4*L ii'pIDp¢¢ V.0 gl!i. --A My4 ttou CH Y�wY -yea. V,p.O ZZ g13° Ni.. rt N�CCN +L.ptl�Yy .Cp wN {,i nnL iVT7A �•N o. Yn�tlSV YY Mr E11 M.pg� N YV`�f _CNab ° 1 Wei yjOY tl yYi Ly OO a'4 '"S N " a-u � K M > OK ~ NN . Z. u i : ar tltl�0 N p • ®pL N M i. �S 1 �6�L$ VIY�I ~tai OQ ,w[Y s Oyu 4 Y .yyL11 WY 6 YV yN,y° .. M. w0y �6t 0.y� � V O �~-St �_��N� �iig. N $ f, TC�pCy y3N LAC «at OF O.N 444 . ^G NY 1�O��y'.'�O. =C�YA a� ~g�q 3vp 4~O��Gy pO ..111 M'OL Y N.1Q' ab W �� O NXW`p V69 C*'1 H ►1Wi1sw <in �"111fff LfN1 ENO it�•N\t siv u�." -.". o.i 31�w$� ' <N a7. c� i�.�v a� LqY AiC CL CGy L r qn�2 r OtCCi r_LACLY rES Mi Y~ Y iYr C ^.SL a'Q� _ y uN N ay 56.12 �°jS a.n- ��aw lyY �' =00 LN�� °y1 �w Y QaLM tiYdv ?� as ~NG Fw 1yL _L y N N .jam M yaa Ltl pQ tl0. vlilh N 'Gc8 4+Y0 wy WY N 6° .+ E�. �.• Y�V'ysy Ly y i' 4 S T Y iC is i a+ iPpl y y� a'1 pUa is d '> YC 3A .� .- y g. Y rA N J C 6ti Y� S.Z.S ^`c i��'ea' � y��^ j'A � �� �a•L•' °T �ti�a �vazL�l r L d„ C� ��' ��AI • �Y tl�� N � � �� Z aY.'�V.'�`�aV �.lM >=ta qV` e �? 25 p $av L � N Pop _yyC .tl.{1 .yr�j � et.N VC?C^ r8 eMS��I s7C9 V C1{t- I° C p yNyY $�i 44C �O ., W y 1� CT� 20 -E L`ON aYy�RVi r°. .�j �OL R � �WZ 20 -EA � L M ri N 'M M �a e, -c w�a 1 r =fir w3u f�j Vira ali . itti sEc p S8 yy t O y 4C.^ g6YY + Y06 d p fV. C Yyq �Y + y w yqqqy ' 9~ M ti. C u '2 3 A9 x O } ow sit 4 r. y COL� +iLUy �V O® G iµµf.. OS'U�YC6.�S 0 0 G w P Q 135= n V Y j ;;I Y r A wn N CA��gyL. C w Y T OpiiYV{L Zw .•OOYr q Y.O° g w �D > Y+`. w .A. agis Y {J Y j L.. u AJ W O a L L y C' O�{N/� �G�v Y µ =L H.YG V.yL qUC N N Y Y�C at Y'.. 01 tom. ryw Yf �M JINZ{ tigC� cN �:C.r v�M C4 a6 .211f Ia --,,a 4i. Y f.'y w�N,L3 1`O� J 6�Vo O. �YW �A.�G ti 9�tl„ 555V ■ ■ ■pppLLL (y iag� 44 4 p ±��/j�[ L y g y A- NiWi V���O _N yi1L c A Yr� N'C9�� au C qq g y x iC.iO'wi earl Zc r4. Vi fCiw6i ary 10w. �' =.oi'Lx'.1 . 4p G ptle e , L JaS \ O V wT VOA Y sNGY 6 YNySy OL ? Oy 2O y 3 C Has y yi ? 6p t! S M -8C 4- ' 4ei s W- N pp` p' � IYr c'O p YJdQ o N uMw. ^�J 0� (, •�2 Y (y� L�Lq � 'L AoY lyL �Y O• �y �� N� 41 t� >Y? L91 qq ,y w yy INA �• yRy q w n aA V N t C CN VY t{Lv A We— tl''n � C C City ^(,Wc ,' GYLO� �9� D ±,YG p 3 � N ; N y o. T� p a{'�i w �: Y. N a.4 GG GwG Y G V O� P 9GY� V 1 A Y t71 A I L S 5 A a g ■. O w f " `j v g S o. o N "w 3. {_LYE g N s e{vC�,ti � ■NV1w.—'r IO°G'�,. YANC 'A Z A �0'^ Y G1�GAO r� OCTY y■Q ■66�'��`yI Nw. gCq.00 tiYi w'• W. Y W atOe Y =t a G 0 N L V M C N .G 4✓ 4) N G = IT i Y` tL! p: l r.M wQ 2 a` =1ii. y8 yI 8 C� j 5 w \ �„• F�� q:ka -:.. V` ;Ya 00a&14%, Y b� PSINiYIT tl C L U � r w ss 1� & C VqqY if ^' NOS L {ygC�iy� N.y} a�a�T C ■ 11 iY w.-GL vw C q N Q iR O��' ar3 y C � C �pTp�rii � yV OyCLOX Cv cog° az- Ypy w.w �EVp. L�pM —lots CLOTL n-J d aSVi'O i. 4 & 11p2 IL 1tlR 62 p c O$ a r C 9 Oft I yypC - b e NpR Vy�� NL�fCI Tm EI 9.S i N Li! 04. 4atleY g�tt . qyf aU AM K4NQ C 6ti�n"•� w a %s 1C f um C Ora Oy Y Y O A N = t n a$ c w o r •L �V•rr YC11 �W V� �O C»�% L{Uj ^yC 111N T4 � G yMMC {pw di n 4 � �.�� i s 8 ti Y Y p ~ L C N tc' Y~ z_ P :! Sy! �° GfpL�1 01p I -, Ar t o •O M� c Y� A9 m 4 � �� C C� �'� °+ri �Ll V� �'• •Y t Y ' N L N K1 iwv .emu :A �r Ytt. O=mi 'c .5 ?g. PLLitJ w: �w'tS 1sT w C� • 3 b� PSINiYIT tl C L U � r w ss 1� & C VqqY if ^' NOS L {ygC�iy� N.y} a�a�T C ■ 11 iY w.-GL vw C q N Q iR O��' ar3 y C � C �pTp�rii � yV OyCLOX Cv cog° az- Ypy w.w �EVp. L�pM —lots CLOTL n-J d aSVi'O i. 4 & 11p2 IL 1tlR 62 p c O$ a r C 9 Oft I yypC - b e NpR Vy�� NL�fCI Tm EI 9.S i N Li! 04. 4atleY g�tt . qyf aU AM K4NQ C 6ti�n"•� w a %s 1C f v 000Y', O O d 4 4f. s wri � � w w°�dA.+ H H ' 'q Y Y C _ 1 1 NHS N N V sN w Ca _ ai10.i Y. Y YN � ��M u u A ALyL + +yyyy C w R R ^ ^ ' '°�L« u L i i Y Y O OI C C��.uy w ) T uy �W�� Z ZL.� L LV� y yy N L ti 1 1N' ^ T e Y p4q t L^ y 6`yQ M .�+ W W N FMK CM ' ' M M . b L t y0 t ^Wp p$CYiiai`pp14� � �vGGO+fCC+ 9 9T�Y'O 9yy L t0a 2 L�� N N A ACpC 0 0.1 7YiYy p p 0 � C CIO Y Y�yY.O Y Y � ��Y � �� L L w w t� p p MYV E QL YL G 0.yy � ~L C +pyJ Y t tN VpQ V V � c°d• � Eppy• � �.(eL�y v L LO^`V ' EN�ZA C Q g,. M M P O. > >p S y^ . S L L C C 6 CB.tl ° S`fs �P � \O G G D DYiil� � �O Y Y K K V V �^ o o2 r 'A u u✓�$�i't n np'tyc LLV aWO� L LY L LN`Je N r" ' aJY O O1�NgpW � �� R R 'in N F - -V G G «yy 11 yMy L NO i iVtG � 6rC. W NW F ii = ` `V, 6. �S'.4) 6 WMNLEV 1 1 V VO K Kw.� y ��` \\ \ ! l l f \1 � f M MI l l 1 1 y lag 2� �p SM 1 Figs I Y b N N N y✓ Net O C M Yd• ti ° � ��ee yas G N 4�L W i L V 4q KAS' r 1 to N 2 N S O 9-9 N ®6r^ C..h ` MS YsNw� �C p pS p= \�M «Y " ILS {aC l YIOik i+ �9`�',w Cp .S C o A a lY,.'.MC \� ��M w'N Y4L ".ppga %V �aa geN i4�1I Yiw 0..OH O y1A yV s as ..� rMn�tl ,i.,NU' H°.W yF K4W w �y Y oflS K � G M L: r 1 to N 2 N S O 9-9 N ®6r^ C..h ` MS YsNw� �C p pS p= \�M «Y " ILS {aC l YIOik i+ �9`�',w Cp .S C o A a lY,.'.MC \� ��M w'N Y4L ".ppga %V �aa geN i4�1I Yiw 0..OH O y1A yV s as ..� rMn�tl ,i.,NU' H°.W yF K4W w �y Y oflS K � G M L: to N 2 N S O 9-9 N ®6r^ C..h ` MS YsNw� �C p pS p= \�M «Y " ILS {aC l YIOik i+ �9`�',w Cp .S C o A a lY,.'.MC \� ��M w'N Y4L ".ppga %V �aa geN i4�1I Yiw 0..OH O y1A yV s as ..� rMn�tl ,i.,NU' H°.W yF K4W w �y Y oflS K � G M L: O ` A O appg/ � M C n i ti i. a �Ca � Y R^ aY 8lL �q �ya�1 Y= Y Y Yy �YV O� Jyi W r. N 64 OI�yVy f L d r p xa 'a uo F-Z V n :a El�6e Y t Y MNM° L Y OS `psue NSA` L W L Y S C L Y�� ULN .Y. wMtrg n xL % �Ar°ryi L ±��OA CAL frY1�C Q— p I O ` A O appg/ � M C n i ti i. a �Ca q i Y R^ pLi 8lL �q �ya�1 Y= Y Y Yy �YV Y SS ° n p.. W r. N j+d"O SLd r p L Y a' O d n :a El�6e Y t MNM° ~MV Y C D MC N u rs. .Y. wMtrg n xL e.a'CRa �Ar°ryi L ±��OA CAL frY1�C Q— p I ~ Y M. ° LL G L ruN y_�pC V C -0 N C��'%j a� � 216 N M'LY O� uu YO 4 NT Ap gq_q °�,a tinu°•p///'fy r pp, q; py NM 6L K O y 1:� a l i Y +T BEN 8lL �q �ya�1 Y= Y Y �YV vyd a�p r. N j+d"O SLd r p C 6 Y C i MNM° ~MV Y C D MC N u i�uu"IT e.a'CRa �Ar°ryi L ±��OA CAL frY1�C M. MST RESOLUTION h'O. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNIW' 'COMNISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECOMMENDiN APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP N-4,r 13,360 FOR THE, DEVELOPMENT OF 140 TOWNHOME UNITS ON 1I!.lt ACRES OF F ,'14 LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF Foot,ILL BW XVARD AND BAKER AVENUE IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL R`STRICT - APN 207- 201 -30, 41, 42 AND 43 A. Recitals. (i) Greenview Estates Development has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 13650 as described 4n the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution; the subject Tentative Tract Map request iz referred to as "the application", (ii) On the 23rd of September, 1937, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the applicatic -r and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on .September 23, 1987, including w1 tten and oral staff reports,_, together with public testimony," this Commission hereby specifically finns'as follows: (a) The application app'ies to property located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and baker Avenue with a street frontage of 648.82 feet along Foothill Boulevard and lot depth of 837.55 feet and is ppreesently improved with a single family resivancle and accessory structures; an (b) The property to the south, east and Wsst are designated for residential uses. The property to the south and east is developed with a mobile home park and this property to the west is developed with a townhome complex. (c) The property, with the recommended conditions of approval, comply with all minimum development standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. with the MediumdResideentialyland use d signatioontoffthelGeneralunits Planconsistent PLANNING COMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 13650 - GREENVIEW ESTATES OEYELOPMENT September 23, 1987 Page 2 (e) In that the applicant has not yet obtained the necessary drainage easement, the Planning Commission is recommending approval of the tentative map to the City Council due to the possibility of condemnation in order to obtain the drainage easement. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented`'tz this Commission during the above - referenced ;,sbiic hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Devf,'.opment Code, and specific plans; and (b) The design or impraements of the tentative tract is consistent' with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (c) The si':e is physically suitable for the type of development proposed, and (d) The design of the subc(iu--�-zn is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and WIdlife or their habitat; and (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and (f) The design of the tentative tract gill not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, far access through or use of the p;-gperty within the proposed subdivision. T This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has bec,e reviewed anO considered in compliance with the California Environne,ital osaity Pct' of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration, S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division: (a) Tire following items shall be incorporated into the final landscape plan which shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits: 1 -113 /.. x PLANNING CO tI320N RESOLUTION NO. TT 13650 - QREE4 IEW ESTATES DEVELOPMENT September 2;1, IW7 Page 3 (i) Trees to be removed shall be replaced with specimen size trees and shall he incorporated into the final landscape plan which shall be reviewed and approved 4y the City Planner prior to the issuance of buildi.nq permits. I. The sidewalk along FonthiP-,i'Boulevard shall meander. 2. Special accent landscaping shall be provided at the project entries and at the corner of Foothill Boulevard and Balser Avenue. 3. Landscaping consistent with the Foothill Specific Plan shall., be provided along Foothill Boulevard. 4. LandscapiAg shall be provided 2throughout the site to,r eats a unifying theme. MY Variation shall be provided in the garage door design subject to review and approval by the City Planner prior to tie issuance of building Flrmits. (c)' Additional architectural detailing shall be provided around all windows. The revised plans shall be reviewed and approved by ',he City Planner prior to the issuance of building permlffs- (d) ;Additional relief shall be provided on s.71 elevations fronting Foothill Boulevard. The relief shall be in the form of architectural detailing or landscape materials subject to revic°w and approval by the City planner. (e) Parking space numbers 74 and 81 shall be eliminated and replaced with landscaping, (f) Parking space numbers 82 and 83 shall be eliminated apd Building 11 -4 shall be shifted south to provide a minimum ten foot landscaped area between the building and the parking stalls to the north.. The revised plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. (g) The tra',h enclosure at the southwest corner of the site :shall kp relocated out of public view from Baker Avenue subject to review and approval by the City Planner. (h) The California buckeye and Brazilian pepper trees, identified as letters "o" and "M" respectively, shall be preserved unless evidence is provided to the City Planner that to do so would create a severe hardship on the development of the site. Guidelines outlined in the arborist`s report for, protection during construction and trimming following construction shall be adhered to, (i) Trees to be removed shall be replaced with specimen size trees and shall he incorporated into the final landscape plan which shall be reviewed and approved 4y the City Planner prior to the issuance of buildi.nq permits. PLANNING COMMISSION kESOLUTION NO. TT 13650 GREEN'VIEW ESTATES DEVELOPMENT September 23, 1987 Page 4 Engineering_Di�ttsion: (a) The existi:tg overhead utilities - (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Baker Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole offsite south of the project's south boundary to the tixminus pole on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. Refmbursement of one -half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development as it occurs on the opposite side of the str.eet is not feasible because the property is presently 4)*- eloped. (b) A private storm dr fn /system shall be constructed from this proposed project to an approved disposal site within a private drainage easement to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. (c) The, developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off -site property interests necessary tr construct the required storm drain facilities, and if to or she should fail to do so, the developer shall at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off• -site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form (if a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by developer, at developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. 11 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission sh0h certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, Y§87. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ;!ri BY: Larry T. McNiel, -na rman ATTEST: Brad Buller, epu y re arf y �' ' PLANNING CGwt,".ra"" RESOaTIGH TT 13650 - GRUMVIEW, CSTAXES DEVELOPMENT September 23, 1987 " Page 5 I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced., passed, and adopted by the Planning CoviMssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Comission held on the 23rd day of September, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: CO MISSIONS 1S: � HOES: V'' i ISSIfIMEM ABSENT: WOOS, SIGNERS: C) z U a 11 M M�M-S �~VF�c..F. V�6� �wYy'~ «NiwV.�C No- ihyhyhyYYNp_pp \eF i _ •�Sn. \ �j w A�6ypa q qR fYi.wr� � ��q L LAy�WrY l!yygg � s r. r N W F \1 i► Nu � V Y �4 V���Qp'Vt R�wy�`v.yp,.... r3' y' Y sp. L iy nV T�i�y F +�NY � YEP �w N IL 4f �I O z U 0 :G 12 sj �@ a N p it N . y v'dr�;l q M + + L wa� s C� M �y� ��S E gyp 3 fi� E N yA g�1� S LiF+, &N 'O y Y 4 Fflms-g F��u�4� 3H 1155 .12 i X'„ e ran x eov He . °-3 $ �+ y>siyL .u. iL 42 U 3 aaw+ U a $ ^'1 g C+ 8 E� Y♦p Ala x h man 1 as 'S4 ul oC. G = i k !! +•i yr Y �yy7: Y r6a s ¢$. ` J� g rfa� fall YO �� oa US u XZ Otto E + t °4 Si r+M�_ urs ^w . a _ ♦� i6C � .y. Er.�Yt aP: all 2+ MN tf ::Y� �y ■� 4A, � C • 4,Y VON �'CCC'yw wau 43 W42119 F� g ' t23 illin c � � N � W L O ♦ � � � � � z-m.:z r 14 °�ri .N-d _ 6 « ^ y 11 11 11 0 11 4� °u^ w} ti K � b 4 �C wL 1r 4� �Sn yyyyWtttt aiii�T Kai�4 e A� N 3 M �C "t +�a 1�^ �a e� i� Y' g tt{{� s� 4 4 n a4 6 1 � L M V� qq> Y �p Y si pW i Y ,y y Y �m 4 � �wN• W �w �C b Y�Xw L a Y a » »ia A � i N Oc w� wiir+t 1113, T+ v t. 4 YYi'YS•� . h.1 g a e� M M L �gy Q � ~pp V L t .N, ^tqi 4 Y +cYw w� x`�pP CY llw ate► fi till u N � Qs,-' iiwaS 51:414 'a L W d�r� 'VP$�RfGgit..tiw w. ac wY� ����� 'yyp Oat tlQ �•.��N�QNalu1+xY. Rio � Y t�t�!NT�� _ YYY+•C• L'�,��y¢+�y1��('«Jlaµ•K� •rY g11�yY��4�� +apYpY kL w` T ��q atT a `YwY Y � .T}. �r QS + a 2 :2128,M41— -1 34 J. M tl L a r » p +� 9ri N agiQ 6YJ s'g g Is I t=Z F 4a� w M M t M y,.uw� UM wYi ~jy �� UIW wy ■��= ^.y nit i'�' �'i«� �p~�N $» #, all YwIMLM 4� °u^ w} ti K � b 4 �C wL 1r 4� �Sn yyyyWtttt aiii�T Kai�4 e A� N 3 M �C "t +�a 1�^ �a e� i� Y' g tt{{� s� 4 4 n a4 6 1 � L M V� qq> Y �p Y si pW i Y ,y y Y �m 4 � �wN• W �w �C b Y�Xw L a Y a » »ia A � i N Oc w� wiir+t 1113, T+ v t. 4 YYi'YS•� . h.1 g a e� M M L �gy Q � ~pp V L t .N, ^tqi 4 Y +cYw w� x`�pP CY llw ate► fi till u N � Qs,-' iiwaS 51:414 'a L W d�r� 'VP$�RfGgit..tiw w. ��att�'}�ggYqeq_ qw ei ,Y ����� 'yyp t A1T1�S �•.��N�QNalu1+xY. aV .Oa V�rW � Y t�t�!NT�� _ YYY+•C• L'�,��y¢+�y1��('«Jlaµ•K� •rY g11�yY��4�� +apYpY �L�'C� IttR w` v"`MMO yQ�Qyt MlaNa Q�Q � 4y� .T}. �r QS + a 2 :2128,M41— o S r�A�Ma !.$!a N s4 Y�rC �y�Y4A� R l G. ■ q* X44 Yw w M M t M y,.uw� UM wYi L's. }I's MFj UIW wy �ya V1lr i. +�yS »+$} YwIMLM 4� °u^ w} ti K � b 4 �C wL 1r 4� �Sn yyyyWtttt aiii�T Kai�4 e A� N 3 M �C "t +�a 1�^ �a e� i� Y' g tt{{� s� 4 4 n a4 6 1 � L M V� qq> Y �p Y si pW i Y ,y y Y �m 4 � �wN• W �w �C b Y�Xw L a Y a » »ia A � i N Oc w� wiir+t 1113, T+ v t. 4 YYi'YS•� . h.1 g a e� M M L �gy Q � ~pp V L t .N, ^tqi 4 Y +cYw w� x`�pP CY llw ate► fi till u N � Qs,-' iiwaS 51:414 'a L W d�r� Cl 13 4 y y�g A.6 1}WU ell 3YY. Y i Yi.`': Y «+ 46 a OYYV Y. OCY y {g.3 �qTY CN V S � y� v3UQ My ^ r L•Y' rO L r IR waW(� .VN yppy� N S �" `i•°�y tyl• ara���j yl Y�i Yw «M 4 Y� lit 3 o M�� � s` IC'Dp8�((��}}}«Ai M`fi cy T L =T �xWW'.. �pp p.+ C M fa pr a�as 4� 66 261 • a ° �� � q M11 \ \2 �I R �I �• Sift SNg�' }a .� . LNY Yy iz «.. s.s Y go gip: c .'� Oe kz Y �' s ' 4 . CL C �°L yUy S ZCa j-.4. 4§ s� r _ s 3i0s g s i "s y� o�c ob- zi 3 3 L « pA Y S tl LA �' .off �-� 1.1 } MMM '�(Y is Y yy, i Nom. P .: ry -Z ?. ¢ ��Al� ��Yy�� .Y ys� � N L � M MN q� ^Q aC pia ._ ° �a $ «u 54 UEM« M ✓ „ Y�NM► ; C J 1.1 r � �s L{ p { U. +r Y sp Mq M N ! « w L1s± 1E` ��YYY A+w Q6 tEII� E1 1wA ,#'Y "-Ah �. a r M..:. rYl °p W V�+ah{,� qei h • } tgNti L a' a .+ L $ � 4 .ma x ra a yN ip = K PS v •� � sage _ AS ell fi� sy ddH rs y YIN y� N�y _ibGG H1 N M N M {RNs al Y S �Iw Si �i K 1 , �� Y 06y°N^+� 5?F� M Y � b ^w'j Tom. vii N� --a i ti ar $ N YG yy rr� yy M Z 01 q ABC' Q L7 rp `ry�1aLy Ty. Yr7 y N M Aft Pit If • $of yS 9w• wll ,¢N+L.'wrKc�°i emu° OYi �w�w�e'�,,,¢,, rGp4. e.y V yY As P Lr #�j ii NY V�b _ G ° al py�ip tt 6 q y� Y� f�4 .t� s �NCC1N *NW at w ♦ ~ 7q.r � i � �Fq� � 24: T N erg r K w v � v Z. a mt N Q }p Y4iip+�Nr�.M rwwwi. Nwl! �fyj Q�j� Sc4 S 1lw�. g�.� {���N tY9is1 r ~ O Hai V 4 M. � «i1 y1 G4rnN n� �i'4 ��•� �N C a � i w,1 M���A. ue f'.f uaia. L'w.}s Mar �rffp'wT "`-g �i Y a ean.ef5 o..,rr t� i a y tl QF -bit a C D A "'tl4i Y ;FS dyK N N. O 21 eta v ��Dr ♦6 aCY ^ irb., � KO� � N 4y' MQ w byr� +�� tla Y V W& g y ca- :51. q V tlNtl Yq *tlY ^sE AaJId ^ �}{^ GN V' .'Sry ��} ^ YpN t"•'�LT• �u ��Yy µ�� � LH'�" *�.� tl'OiIT @ �OfI *4 F {y R '�Vh S y 5eYp �^ ' O�� 63 S�Q � ■p @. N�w'`�� 8�i� p�q, Zt ,p N� w �pM bw `p�OY? r�V� �� �iC Y LY L1• �_ljYS �i ~� �_� �iW. ,U �r 9 �wqY �N yy `*�Sf$ o: �ri rV4N <Gtw y z OYtl U Y« aNiY OyY qY 1 :'.._Y at V SZ Y.� p Y 7W a p�q a i, � yY `ye p i Zea 13 4s. es V N yy � +sue yQ+yp M w R ' `�Yay . wL aY� C L�� �i. wLi hCtW V.+ KQM) .. W vrv� t I 9 0 V W R 11 �J pO G0. N L V 6 M C Y�Qo+ ZY �tP� -e g uV •�Y� L � N ' N �1 yy p77 yM�yM ', pL YLC�'61 CpN Y N_L 6 ^�iC c° Y C V Ly A (c 4Y Y� qqYO C� ts' YV� �° y v Cy 73, N c °N Y� ry� y \Y11 +w6f L O d w'�p O Sit! L Y Y e °r COT b�L pY Y Q yyO t a yy' yi �JC Y VwN �tYC «� pO G0. N L V 6 M C Y�Qo+ ZY �tP� -e g uV •�Y� L � N ' N �1 yy p77 yM�yM ', pL YLC�'61 CpN Y N_L 6 ^�iC C Try UY Y O�+ L�� Gyt/ 406i qqYO C� N + Yw L V + O d w'�p Sit! L ay' i�g sCy VwN �tYC «� Os33 243 3 O CLa M M.r rz rt t ° a� � if L -1. O Q pp q. yy� Y Y MIS kit Y ZQZ2 {{ R�,� q C 014 r G M N N i aNa <LSi 13 \1 � u Y N C Try UY Y O�+ L�� Gyt/ 406i qqYO C� Or.i Y�3Y1 L Y JLY Y w'�p Sit! L ay' i�g sCy VwN �tYC «� Os33 243 3 O CLa M M.r rz rt t ° a� � if i�1 -1. O Q p=* Y MIS kit Y ZQZ2 {{ R�,� E /'Trr%Xr no t] AATt'WA MTn A i6 XVIA _IST X, 4AFF REPORT DATE: September 23, 1987 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Boller, City Planner Btu: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: EOVIROWENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13541 ALLWK - me oeveaopment or -. iz iot custm subnivision on �C�es of land in the Low Residential', Bistrict (2 -4 dwelling units per acre), located north of Red Hill Country Club Drive at Sierra Vista - APN: 207 - 411 -10, 207 - 080-01 and 48. 1. BACKCROU'W: On duly @, 1987, the Planning Coaaamissio(i reviewed and unan massy approved Tentative Tract 13541. The deign of the tract consisted of the direct connection from Red Hill Country Club Drive to the existing .portion of Sierra Vista Street providing for the development of 12 lots. During the public hearing before the Planning Commission, several area residents expressed their opposition to the proposed direct connection. They felt that the connection Mould result in additional traffic that could not be accommodated by the existing portion of Sierra Vista due to its poor state of repair and narrow width. The residents felt that a cul -de -sac design would be more appropriate. The planning Commission, hotievev, felt that the connection was necessary in order to eliminate the long dead end street and to provide a better opportun?ty for emergency vehicles to respond to the site in the event of an emergency. As a result, the Planning Commission approved the tentative tract map with the direct connK'zlon from Red Hill Country Club Drive to Sierra Vista with a condition requiring that the new portion of Sierra Vista Street be devised withh more of a curvilinear design subject to review and approval of the City Planner ar.d City Engineering. II. APPEAL: Following a Planning Commission hearing, area residents T e ar appeal requesting that the City Council review the issue of the connection to Red Tall Country Club Drive. On August 19, 1987, the City Council conducted a public hearing to hear testimony on the appeal. Once again, the area residents stated their concerns about the proposed through connection and the impact it would have on their existing portion of Sierra Vista. They also stated chat there were alternative designs that could be used that would still allow adequate emergency access. City Council, after ITEM 14 PLANNING C0WISSION STAFF REPORT TT 33541 - Allmark September 23, 1987 Page 2 receiving ail. public input and testimony, stated that the subdivision C. Od be cedes ~,lned without the direct connection between Red L it Country Club Drive and Sierra Vista and without sacrificing emergency vehicle response times. P., a result, City Council u,�heid the appiml of the area residents and referred the tract map to the Planning Commission with the direction that as alternative design be provided that would eliminate the direct connection between Red Hill Country Club Drive and Sierra Vista. III. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant has resubmitted the tract map which proposes 12 lots as was originally submitted. The applicant has, ir^ response to City Council direction, eliminated the direct 'Connection off Red Hill Country Club Drive. The applicant is proposing a cut -ode -sac at the southern portion of the site tFiereby extending_ Sierra Vista an additional 300 feet. In addition, the applicant is proposing to extend the alley along the east and north tract boundaries to connect to Sierra Vista to provide secondary emergency access. B. Environmental'—�Assessmrent: The Planning Commission issued a ega ve Declaration on Silly 8, 1987 for the development of 12 lots. Staff has reviewed the Latest submittal by the applicant and has determined that the new subdivision design will not create any additional adverse environmental impacts. Wherefore staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. 0, IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS• The project is consistent with the General an and Development Code. The project will not be detrimental to the public';. health or safety, or cause nuisances or significant adverse ?n!ironmdntal impacts, in addition, the proposed use and the sine plan, together with the recommed. ±d conditions of approval,, are in compliance with applicable provisions of the Development Veda and City Standards. V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Daily Report newspaper as a pllblic hearing and notices have been se to at I property owners within 300 feet of this site. VI. RECD MENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission conduct a puTic hearing to receive all input and testimony on the proposed subdivision. If, after receiving al; the input, the Planning Commission feels that the revised subdivision design adequately addresses the direction of the City Council, staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract 13541. If, however, the Planning Commission determines that the proposal is not consistent with City Council direction, staff 9— i PLANNM IOMI ISTAFF REPORT TT 13641 - Al's September Page 3 recommends that the Planning Comm#ssio� r h this item back'to the applicant with direction as to the apt_,prie-t design altekative and that this item be continued to allow the applicant to revise the subdivision accordingly. AB fu71 submitted, anner BB:SM:vc Attachments: Exhibit "A" _ R .,td Tract Map Exhibits *8",, Ri sed Grading Plan Resolution'-,'.'f Approval with Conditions 0 U _ f VIA MARACA TT t 1 OUMACA CALU ? ( # \ SW RADIUa DIM cod - �- CALLE -_ CA@AK \ raffia •cc V� I NORTH I CI Ti ENI= _4// RATNUH0 CUCAMTONIGA TITLE:1 �1✓G/ `/ PLANNING DIVb9M EXHIBIT SCALE- I rr) 66 73 is Ed 7 AO� 5 —7 —;-1 —C-1 2� z t M 7 rAftf 6-9 7C t Y10 so c l2 i J9 4 to 5 Ago" 4-w RED HILL ORIVE RED HILL IR� NO M.B.. 21/33 PORTION LOT 7 J4 J'a j..w 2 H SUB, M.B. j8j"33 z- PCFA-JON LOI[i 13 N M.B. 11 INMTH CITY CU RAINUD CLJCATN"'-'k'v1A TITLE: PLANNING DIVISM EXHIBIT. -6 SCALE. m 5 ,S L & if � -� �k- '?' ���"_._. ...� �.•.'' � = -- �."..�-.��-;.:, TA ti ti J- Cµ4E cjm A&E l CITE OF W RA'S CHQ CUCAI NSA TM: � PLANNING DiNgSION EXHIBIT. SCkLE- _________„ ?f ry) _(o `, °ESOLUTIOW NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPRtiuING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13541, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 12 LOTS ON 4.3 ACRES 0." LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRiYE AT SIERRA VISTA STREET IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT APR: 2W- 411 -I0 and 207- 080 -01. A. Recitals.. (i) Allmark, Incorporated has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Hap No. 13541 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On the 8th day of duly, 1987, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application, concluded said hearing, and approved the project on said irate. (iii) Following an appeal filed by area residents, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heb'ring on the application an3 concluded said hearing on that. The City Council stated that the proposal shall be redesigned and referred the application back to the Planning Cowission. (iv) On the 23rd of September, 1987, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application ana concluded said hearing on that date. (v) .111 legal prerequisites t- the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution.. NOW, THEREFORE, it is •.2by found, ,etermined and resolved by the Planning Commission ok the C':Ly of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on September 23, 1987, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located on the north sisin of Red Hill Country Club Drive at Sierra Vista Street with a street t frontage of 60 feet and lot depth of 273 feet and is presently vacant; and (b) The property to tt north, south, east and west are designationed for residential uses and' .re presently developed with single family residences. m� PLANNING COWISS ON RESOLUTION Nip. TT 13541 - A'limark September, 23, 1987 Page 2 tc) She proposed project, with the recommended conditions of approval, complies with all minim= standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, (d) The extensiion of the alley from its current location to Sierra vista will provide secondary emergency access to the site. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- r'ferenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth ii- varagrarfi i and \,\2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows. (a) ibat tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (b) The design or irorovements of the tentative t A t is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; an (c) The-site is physically suitable for the type of keveltipment proposed; and (d) The design of the subdivision ° ins .not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlif or their habitat; and (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of 'record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subd-- 7ision. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission issued a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Engineering Aielsion: a. Sierra Vista Street: 1) Provide 30 feet of dedication measured from centerline (60 feet total) and a standard cul -de -sac bulb; 2) Eight inch curb and gutter per City Standard Drawing No. 343 shall be used; and 3) Sidewalk shall be located 0.5 feet from the right -of -way ,ne along both sides of the street. _., PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 13641 - Allmark September 23, 1997 Page 3 j b. Monte Vista Drive shall be improved to alley standards including: 1) Sufficient additional pavement to provide a total width of 20 feet for the length from Sierra Vista Street to Chula Vista Drive; 2) A minimum 0.1 foot overlay of the exi Ling pavement; 3) Maintain driveable access to the prope -ty to the east; and 4) Provide diagonal pavement cutoffs at the 90 degree turns to meet the Fire Department turising requirements. c. The owner of the fence encroaching onto lots 6 and 7 shall be provided the right to protest the removal of the fence and shall be so notified in writing prior to recordation of the final map. d. Frovide.a drainage facility from Sierra Vista Street to Red Hill Country Club Drive within a 12 foot minimum width dedicated easement. The portion within lot 8 of 'the tract shall be a closed conduit.. A surface overfaa. ath shall also be provided. The total design shall be as approved by the City Engineer. 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, i987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McKlet, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the C.ty of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that es foregoing Resolution was dely and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commissi r of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held } on the 23rd day of September, 1937, by the following vi^te -to -wit: AYES: CQWIS31ON£RS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: CCML ISSIONERS: { U P S wM�L F+YOY°f�y LU I 9 d N C r e ••• •L `t G p E w Iij YN °yam N�1� Y�W� y� y ° N i f C^ 4 �Z's Ei" o ° °C YA °� s_ lit -" M JAR M s `a a� a pr s« gg iF Yi N y°.. it 3 � ~ ru N�CuN On g 50 ({�' ,{•1Y {`y' its ~ ^omit. W f+ pp /. • N M f N i tL M I•�� * d aV yaC Y ^�` ^P GyM~4r� ��M COeL 46 OA�4Mi Y.�6 wC.Y y�° t^ilCyt NV«y'V �1pO p�C•Y� Ing TA yy µM yrr SSy6twr ��yMy_�_�yy �C�yN�•`Yis� NN �N���E�} ai�:� «YY+ Jt29NW�si� • a P N .2 G Y L Y � o i N9 Nf ° 6 • N° Q �I g y^ y L NGGL y 6 Y CCL • _° a` �sN M N�Y � GYj r °Y •�� �C A --fl, L YtiR+ Y)40 p YM -y yin is YY Y1- �w3 LAY 40.^ °SN�Y �Ui► Y•C� _Yw: IOW � OC L M y j }�yyi yC Y w � a 1 -47 Win N rn -- 11 j pY�4 Y a tq " lk ; a LL NT� M� M L"NG 6ti L V W $N�• *-a • YY •MN• °� !N Jill �dw w jaas. tsu w!Lw! Q'(H.e y f CE N Y. Y ".c M{�{��� ±pN N•$t�Q Aw g .V..'OdN+� y� •c�a « ;N ...y�L u�a.r,O UO iI"3s sg'tri S �_ w�i+ • f I 0 11 N Y \ 1 L 4 O ,O t O O C o O O O O O Y a •(f }\ w O _ C .0 To lT .11Z .. ALT acso t'fnYi t0.�y � r IL Q a 3 gY ++�OR,�� Y� NLy i.N Y pp wy SO °iO kaj _ ��S 3 Y C _L O4 Yy& � w i0. ifet t � J� ^N1tV Y ttY �•° tC° T�O 4Y`.1 N•I�V6p py� ��0 , O yw• Y LYIYY f L.. �'qp 0a1 fY,�YY pN T N 0 W N S yy yy* t 4 L�VY ML�M N Y^'Y i. '•Co Y.N�4 C�L YP IL 9Gig Y q�NR •N OL Q yv we • N�CC.. QL iP� w ��n CY. ],,.tt a y4� ^ •.: wa haw •-e1 t of in OUP w � ur' •K•u• Q _ C y L ttaa ! ^an` ai M N �LUN CC y iq Ca"Y •� NYSUuM nM 0.O Y ^q3 O4y g7�Y.afi�t�" stOY -1 a� ft •G ~ g p ^ L M N orb# g� g8 q; Q�$�g 3og•� Lam + .S3 . « 7& iiyA+ y��N 82CM «`Y "X ; &Nr =S Pe� T�dN $o y 1a� NN rL -.r .S y�!'$g s Oki pwI . If ,y ^si�� tJw L NLwtwi ■N W ■� /�MU YY�p� ... °CC`°LI`�c�WY. a•90YYyy�i,. N�tl� cYCV {y VwLW. H�NyN • KM� •C 3M O ' M,=L iN Y.w.�M >°Y jCN O.O KoL wC iO,F,. 40 +G M t —0 L.. cZ gssgaN: E t.oac *mot n`� ^y"3. qp. ° ^O°o, `5 . Z. M au iI is "� 0W a =egZn LO p` CY N� x� QpL'wxy 4y`y •N. ]y. 6G3 wK` YY^ 1 �+• =f� ^ 0Rf NL K^ QSiz r, yWy W to p"� f 6~ Y �Y oO ;il °'1 Nw ZI L C �M� Y wpb. Z" -S A LY N 10 VNYw YY 46 Y L °PwLp $ pp4 C �. Y"�. T. ■;w x $.b, �Yy: «.L Y�.`L. .p r ° «YJ ..go w • wN•'• v «N« •� �P �\� C =� L'Jq a9�/• yw,p �� ®Y �> Y QY V OQ L�,�K Q Y... yyy t� .0 yp {� �p1 } � � � SS ZZuV N♦ wr C.^' •r3.9 N Ow w�`Y C" �dbb..V V.�MY �Myt a Y V Y* w ap ■ Y Y Y L.0) G --Z! _k6 L w w 0■ Y p°•. :•s�a'4w at � o .07»� p w w L R • w Y T-_ 3§ Y�S 6w4 w X?E 6/a p P '�YA� Y ;Sz_ .yC sib$; .Z i> •� wcg `egggAS pL °Q 'o -.iii W 118.5'5 bL� L Y _INY Ai Q^q0 M1�N.. "ai + zest <'�IL s e, -- e SO ?. L.r W 4 �� a� � V R.Y.• ^ V • M6C g Y�i �wq E oeay § a jai -.'I . �p�CF L C tl. {!. id !M �� q•� pV YpV w Y O s`M LTM wR.p ^Yt a p' aN+�C M L Y a. g' g M all To �"Na °us3 N N vC+ WL +w a .. C J e L 1 "r U ^f . 'r plc y Q S(�( _... y 6$ �Ct p J�•A,y C G u sib! fi QY 3wYM6 m ti �$YVtL $a wu'•3Q caaNi /u'� PA oMI 7 i f o CI S Y Y y a YypvY w ZN Nc Ca � Y o.� -Z 3- N jj Y'.4 Lam v •VC+Y w M c 4i q L iiu w�+► i u ��v ��J}••... yY r V. sti �.r c V {I Q • °d H fi Vpe w T• � " SOW' "'�•� �s Y� q�Z+ N cy c g C L lO1� 'S° NYLp6 Y g y Yp R. „• NC 6: + Y ypV ♦. y Y' CMC W La L "6 Y .10. "ry-) Lj � 1 M '� vw raL+u L u qw �qyyF C N -� ^rte y ■� per' • Y� V Mi Y 0L�.M '.a ^�01 LQ1pyYY p� `�C Y�ttYN Nv 0 WQ pYV TYY.i qu i V= �NGV {0u6 rjbW �o4 i NL. AN.r �1q.�CC0 �� lyO� M CIO V t■�i�p �� �L 2q Lyfi 4 cv \� ~CCG ■ ■��� 6 6w C'P Y 3 D i ~ M 8 G a r r sity +� Y C we •w C yY + Cy '^WY 9 9 G GY.LV „ „CO w� v r L,3G cur r rCit 8 y4 v rya� s SO^ 0 0101 q q c c� y Z Z grt: Aw C Cat w w aVi � ,GaLLL"ti =L3yN=40 r a ai ri � �I jai -.'I . �p�CF L C tl. {!. id !M �� q•� pV YpV w Y O s`M LTM wR.p ^Yt a p' aN+�C M L Y a. g' g M all To �"Na °us3 N N vC+ WL +w a .. C J e L 1 "r U ^f . 'r plc y Q S(�( _... y 6$ �Ct p J�•A,y C G u sib! fi QY 3wYM6 m ti �$YVtL $a wu'•3Q caaNi /u'� PA oMI 7 i f o CI S Y Y y a YypvY w ZN Nc Ca � Y o.� -Z 3- N jj Y'.4 Lam v •VC+Y w M c 4i q L iiu w�+► i u ��v ��J}••... yY r V. sti �.r c V {I Q • °d H fi Vpe w T• � " SOW' "'�•� �s Y� q�Z+ N cy c g C L lO1� 'S° NYLp6 Y g y Yp R. „• NC 6: + Y ypV ♦. y Y' CMC W La L "6 Y .10. "ry-) Lj � 1 M '� vw raL+u L u qw �qyyF C N -� ^rte y ■� per' • Y� V Mi Y 0L�.M '.a ^�01 LQ1pyYY p� `�C Y�ttYN Nv 0 WQ pYV TYY.i qu i V= �NGV {0u6 rjbW �o4 i NL. AN.r �1q.�CC0 �� lyO� M CIO V t■�i�p �� �L 2q Lyfi 4 cv \� 1 "r U ^f . 'r plc y Q S(�( _... y 6$ �Ct p J�•A,y C G u sib! fi QY 3wYM6 m ti �$YVtL $a wu'•3Q caaNi /u'� PA oMI 7 i f o CI S Y Y y a YypvY w ZN Nc Ca � Y o.� -Z 3- N jj Y'.4 Lam v •VC+Y w M c 4i q L iiu w�+► i u ��v ��J}••... yY r V. sti �.r c V {I Q • °d H fi Vpe w T• � " SOW' "'�•� �s Y� q�Z+ N cy c g C L lO1� 'S° NYLp6 Y g y Yp R. „• NC 6: + Y ypV ♦. y Y' CMC W La L "6 Y .10. "ry-) Lj � 1 M '� vw raL+u L u qw �qyyF C N -� ^rte y ■� per' • Y� V Mi Y 0L�.M '.a ^�01 LQ1pyYY p� `�C Y�ttYN Nv 0 WQ pYV TYY.i qu i V= �NGV {0u6 rjbW �o4 i NL. AN.r �1q.�CC0 �� lyO� M CIO V t■�i�p �� �L 2q Lyfi 4 cv \� V {I Q • °d H fi Vpe w T• � " SOW' "'�•� �s Y� q�Z+ N cy c g C L lO1� 'S° NYLp6 Y g y Yp R. „• NC 6: + Y ypV ♦. y Y' CMC W La L "6 Y .10. "ry-) Lj � 1 M '� vw raL+u L u qw �qyyF C N -� ^rte y ■� per' • Y� V Mi Y 0L�.M '.a ^�01 LQ1pyYY p� `�C Y�ttYN Nv 0 WQ pYV TYY.i qu i V= �NGV {0u6 rjbW �o4 i NL. AN.r �1q.�CC0 �� lyO� M CIO V t■�i�p �� �L 2q Lyfi 4 cv \� c g C L lO1� 'S° NYLp6 Y g y Yp R. „• NC 6: + Y ypV ♦. y Y' CMC W La L "6 Y .10. "ry-) Lj � 1 M '� vw raL+u L u qw �qyyF C N -� ^rte y ■� per' • Y� V Mi Y 0L�.M '.a ^�01 LQ1pyYY p� `�C Y�ttYN Nv 0 WQ pYV TYY.i qu i V= �NGV {0u6 rjbW �o4 i NL. AN.r �1q.�CC0 �� lyO� M CIO V t■�i�p �� �L 2q Lyfi 4 cv \� .10. "ry-) Lj � 1 M '� vw raL+u L u qw �qyyF C N -� ^rte y ■� per' • Y� V Mi Y 0L�.M '.a ^�01 LQ1pyYY p� `�C Y�ttYN Nv 0 WQ pYV TYY.i qu i V= �NGV {0u6 rjbW �o4 i NL. AN.r �1q.�CC0 �� lyO� M CIO V t■�i�p �� �L 2q Lyfi 4 cv \� YMa M ^w WWI Q 01 JG L �.GC ;. it yp. � yya�h Yg C .N. I :•�J � '�i aYasznt—a4 cCy�4.. 1 `` Y • V `ON � AL� MfIK.�� ^A=Y �iM `•L Y J 1bL a'' iF CN.Na : Y a O� p' at L`s LYe Axs +$ N :i Na+�TV wg � y Iz F • c} ! • N +i 1y ii, ii 4 9 Q. YLy's 14 9 0 A. y+ 3. •p fp4 Yo. !. ' y 6 t/M y Yp Y1�LD1_�Yq'. �y4.��3 y `�. ^s6'•C Y A+ a � JaM�s p�_p aC Rwr 8a�:r y0i a•1' ~ + �y �d' Nix S`G @Y all 9s +yy _ ]y y� M UN 48999 Cyyt �S y4 +�� 4-T a y. r C� +. 1+1a •.YrN'Y Y - YwLY iO. �i Y 1 YY p �I LA O C YSY a CyY O� O➢ CIhV y,faK L y a PCC'R Y�Y$ a :+ YYF p w�! =O� _Y V�OY� a LN�O y ^4p14CI ate' C^ L Y..•.�.. R �i N C T�s� Y z4 µ a(y��pp M pt is `u' $ ,y .rte•. " �' C� ^_.o g _ Y� ;h , al! A� M' OY � NI $c. q y w `C ,aivYY O � •^ ^ &I-1 v .-. S i � T ® Y � p Ndl ` �MYty Y yU ,NMM �Ty %YY� MT'�t YG M �Lar ONE _ 8l Sa so. At Its L y ~ Y m�' y MM {Y RLYy� p y �� Ot M R N M L ~ Q M t p 4 YCYH! '�Yy� �w ZY �Q17 t BE pL �i p0 � Op+r�.N• y as �'.•i �qM YY� ai a�+Yaiu SyS� atl. ^p �6y�Gayn w6s Y q« C QM4f i� �» �LL�� pyoN♦ � 4 3��'r�. agQ �G+���L N Gy Y C OR.:4Y 1aA CI'C a 1 N y Qtl y� WtV7 WY:.1 96 t0.'1. 63 �4'Fi. pY. �O4i <611� �•w 4 i J U N �1 si� 14 1 M b -�� � +�. «O T O V TCCq vi $ 3 QO s � dr + + � g � ° •� � N�•L a« dO� U CqY '•���V« 9 V O YP Lw �S YLSYCC. � 1z; yT ipi 9y es M C {CCyS 3.2 pS q L pM ! V a QMM+' y L'• �a sad o .-� t.?g_f pM T YL: N J.O�O NC •+ ^► (� Vim.! _ +� .bA. Y 3. V aL Y yY� L N'` Eli Y r• Y S C K L y Y«A ,Y 19 ti �K V 6 NOM «`. NO 6Mi Qz; C-5 W «NLL Z i •�l J Y V •g � Y # W d � O MV L O L i0 8M i L d M C Jf� Y L N N M L N V � Y 5 N ^gy�pp i+- cs e Ti N i^ 7 Z L y0 M sits Fag 8$ a N�j. �! O o� ttY P t J i n —',5 iwaA+ •g~ r9y is �O Y a «° iLO Mull ` Y ^o is U11111I Y��N «yy L Yu0 ;� +« wp� Ms La 6� pYw_ em «M 6 q.� s°a $ Y +Nw' Q! wo at 7 pai iYL a.Uu i. Bill <ON CWO dyu4. =V ■y8 I.S N 01Q C 4 C tz �T�a ego y Lon } u i n —',5 iwaA+ •g~ r9y is �O Y a «° iLO rl Od ` Y ^o is Y��N «yy L Yu0 ;� +« wp� Ms La 6� pYw_ em «M 6 q.� s°a $ Y +Nw' Q! wo at 7 pai iYL a.Uu i. ii <ON 90 Y NNOY AM em «M 6 q.� s°a $ Y +Nw' Q! wo at 7 pai ,.wM cn all M � «CQ ft •' CWO dyu4. =V ■y8 I.S N 01Q C 4 C tz �T�a ego y �i� «• } V r• Mtlr ^AY 'r y Y« GNV L Y O� yyyyp NGW tir• N L pY _.2 OW w13 w a— # O L V Off �O i0 O .7 yy pSM yVy 6.i O �AY r G qII e�N � v +� SM Y W L y g .2 V O G N Y V m�� uyi GY Mp N 4 C ZG� b \jam u n «may`y $ o° Y w O N O 1 u Vy O Yr. pN�� Tg4C : M tl sYC O Lj 0IZ d L O•� yy L O C�Y V • OLLpq II�� �g� � " J{1�� L nY O Y y +� 0 yyQ y Os,.. � t a n aZ � ^ .n��i ro � S � b> .23 � � g� gy as. � YYY L C C 1"O DY �' ^O 0� + v y � ,�YT..L Y O yC CYVV sOgw N, 8L LN Oyy L p" p� uO \i�yY .K r..v ZV! °y $ ^ag .`Y'J- ML6 ',M . � ttS `�i+� 5A, YE •a+o 'o =`d'' Viva� s■+.. " ay„Yi ^• A a `dew Job tWw Z6W2. � N � ,i I I l I l lu CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ,.I 03CAM tk� . Cl; LU si DATE` September 23, 1987 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commis sib" FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUSJECT: VIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13722 - WILLIAM EYOK COMPANY -- A. residential s0alvision of 120 Iots on 24.57 acres of land in the Medium (4-14 dwelling units per acre) and Medium-High (14-24 dwelling units per acre) Residential Districts, within the Victoria Planned Community, clocated at the:,northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Milliken Avenue - APN: 202-211-13 and 14. Staff is in receipt of a letter from the applicant requesting that this item be continued until the City Council has had the opportunity to act on the proposed Victoria Community Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from Medium and Medium-Nigh to Low-Medium Residential, Therefore, staff recommends that the public hearing be continued to 1. October 14, 1987. RespeYully submitted, Bra u e City P nner 88*.SM•vc Attachments: Exhibit 'A* Letter from Applicant ar ITEM,-N 85310 ARCHIBALD, SUITE B, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91_' 0 - (714) 980-2244 September 16, 1987 �RECtvn_ Cm' OF RANCHO cUCHk10 Mr. Scott Murphy Planning Department City of Rane4o Cucamonga P.Q. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 PL.ANNa4a OI14SION NOA SEP 16 1987 PU 1�l�i�i�lll2t3j4l� 6 Project: Victoria Groves Subject: Tenative Tract #13722 Dear Scott: Victoria C,!ramunity Plan Amendment 87 -02 ` I world like to take this opportunity to express m appreciation of your staf: report and presentation to the Planning Commission for our proposed V:�ztoriv, Community Plan Amendment 87 -02. Your consideration of our position and input on this request was clearly evident and the manner in which the report and your presentation Fairly addressed the issues involved in the ro os p p ed amendment. Pursuant to our discussion we would like to proceed with the processing of the referenced tract and the Community Plan Amendment required for the change of the land use designation for this site. Please notify me at your earliest convenience at which City Council meeting the plan amendment will be heard. If at all possible we would very much like to have +: on the first meeting in October. The development, of this tract is vital to our own building program. It is my understandin^ that we must request a continuance of the Planning Commission hearing for the Tenative Tract which was scheduled for the 9 -23 -87 meeting. We would like to request continuance to the first Planning Commission meeting appropriate after the City Council meeting when the Community Plan Amendment will be heard. Please contact mo for any additional information,. you require regarding this tract and /ov Community Plan Amendment 87 -017'. Again thank you for your help. Rem full;" 7 ven Ford Project Manager SF:sn n �v REAk,ESTAr ,,QEVELOPMENT E t } J. Is —' — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPO RT DATE: Sept mbar 23, 1987 T0; Chairmae► and Members of the Planning Commission )`ROM: Brad Buller, City Planner 1977 BY: Bruce Cook, l*dsociate Planner SUBJECT: GEKERAL'PLAN UPDATES, SCOPE OF WORK /WORK PROGRAM The administrative updates to the City's General Plan were included as a high priority element of the approved 1987/88 Planning Division Work Program. These updates are intended to be administrative /technical in nature only. The lbjective of the updates would be to produce a document to reflect all applicable legislative actions pertaining to the CAneral Plan passed since adoption of the document in 1981, to reflect all policy changes and decisions made since 1981, to remove �gperflous language, and as a general, overall clean up of the document to make it reflective of the City', of Rancho Cucamonga as of 1987 conditions. Also, an update of the General Plan EIR is intended to produce a more meaningful document which could serve as a Master EIR for future d cisions. This would simplify the environmEntcl review process and could eliminate the need for at least some future EIR's associated with individual projects. Attached for your review and consideration is - -.e proposed Scope of Work /Work Program proposed by staff for the General Plan updates. The Work Program incorporates four s -wific tasks to be accomplished: 1. Updates to th :l General Plan document. 2. Updates to the General Plan EIR done in conjunction with the General Plan updates. 3. Synthesis of existing City objectives and policies to update the Community Design dement cf the General Plan to generate development guidelines that focus on the identity of the City and to establish design expectations. 4. Recent State legislation has designated portions of the City as containing significant mining resources. These areas are required to be incorporated into the City's General Plan. the General Plan) will be updated as required to be consistent with the State M'Ining 9- Reclamation Act. I Tr.M 0 r t• + a• 1977 BY: Bruce Cook, l*dsociate Planner SUBJECT: GEKERAL'PLAN UPDATES, SCOPE OF WORK /WORK PROGRAM The administrative updates to the City's General Plan were included as a high priority element of the approved 1987/88 Planning Division Work Program. These updates are intended to be administrative /technical in nature only. The lbjective of the updates would be to produce a document to reflect all applicable legislative actions pertaining to the CAneral Plan passed since adoption of the document in 1981, to reflect all policy changes and decisions made since 1981, to remove �gperflous language, and as a general, overall clean up of the document to make it reflective of the City', of Rancho Cucamonga as of 1987 conditions. Also, an update of the General Plan EIR is intended to produce a more meaningful document which could serve as a Master EIR for future d cisions. This would simplify the environmEntcl review process and could eliminate the need for at least some future EIR's associated with individual projects. Attached for your review and consideration is - -.e proposed Scope of Work /Work Program proposed by staff for the General Plan updates. The Work Program incorporates four s -wific tasks to be accomplished: 1. Updates to th :l General Plan document. 2. Updates to the General Plan EIR done in conjunction with the General Plan updates. 3. Synthesis of existing City objectives and policies to update the Community Design dement cf the General Plan to generate development guidelines that focus on the identity of the City and to establish design expectations. 4. Recent State legislation has designated portions of the City as containing significant mining resources. These areas are required to be incorporated into the City's General Plan. the General Plan) will be updated as required to be consistent with the State M'Ining 9- Reclamation Act. I Tr.M 0 , 1144 1 " %„'' PLAiI�i ON S'Y w REPORT a GEN1t�14 F TES. I l,-Zepted{rs 19 ,, A -'age 2 ' The expected t1meline. is to have thg updating of the documents completed °i by the end of January, with the dKume ►ts submitted for Planning `. Commission review at the second public hearing in March. 1988. REC"EMBATION Ssta�f i*6wmends that the Planri g Commission re, Mew and authorize the proposed work program to enabl sti,",,tn begin the task of the administrative updates to the General !� an. ARM su tted, le anne* BB:BC:ko Attachments: Scope of stork /Work Program for General Plan Updates � I _ I I I jEN& E PLAN UPDA "[S, SCOPE OF WORK/WORK PROGRAM L OBJECTIVES: These updates would be administrative/techrical in nature Y IL 11 only. stantiveCchanges to the conte11 of the document are not part a€ the planned work program for the General Plan update. Any = considerations for substantive ch,,�pgax to the General" Flan, i.e., changes in goals, objectives: pc�licje+s,, -�d ar Implementation strategies ' should be schedcYed as part of a diff,'�ent work program. the updates will be undertaker, etith four objective in mina: A. Legal T" 'vene",l elan wiil be' updated to maintain consistency an '-Be To conformame with all applicable laws, standards, and regulat"io !feg. State Planning Law, State Mining a Reclamation Act (90R,0 a ;c. B. Current - The General Plan will be updated to reflect today's conVTWons and to make the document current with 19G7. C. Usable - The format /organization of the General Flan will be 7vv ewed tq determine if a reorganization is desirable to increase dfrstanding of.the £tents and improve its "e of use. D. General Plan EIR - Ti►ii EIR for the City's General Plan will be up a e o erect the most current conditions consistent with the updated General Plan. 11 II. SCOPE OF WORK: A. Methodology: -' I. The General Plan will firs~ be reviewad on a page -by -page '.asis to determine the scope of changer necessary to text, data, figures, etc. 2. The actual changes to the document will be initiated: a. fibers of Advance Planning staff will be assigned various spctionslduties of the General Plan to be responsible for researching the information and inputting the data. (I) Where applicable, other' City doartments, special afstr,cts, and other governmental agencies, i.e., City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Services, City of Rancho Cucamonga traffic Engineering, Foothill Fire District, Cucamonga County Water District, School Districts, Flood Control District, etc. will be contacted and their input solicited for any changes necessary to the General Plan from their perspective. - 1 '4 GPA UPDATES, =PE OF WORK Page 2 ,r (2) The City's GIS System will be explored as a potential source for updatinj and mapping the various figures located thmaghoat the document. (3) The Project )Manager of the,.General Plan updates, i.e. Bruce Cook,` will to responsible for coordinating the various functions and many tasks necessary to vpdata the General Plan to insure that .111 aspects of the work prograx are proceed ng on schedule and to aniacceptable..level of qualitjr. 3. The revised document wt "I e prepared: a. The text will be revised by clerical staff (current text is already on ward processor). b. Tables and figures to be. updated by Aides. fl) Fic -res to be updated by p-oducing various overti�,t over base map. \ (2) Use of computer to be explored in producing update` tables B. ,Jncurrent Projects: 1. General Plan EiR a. As the factual, technical data base for the General Plan, the General Plan EIR also needs to be updated to be a viable usable document reflective of today's conditions. b. $22,000.00 is available to be used to contract for` consultant services to prepare the updated EITI document. 2. Community Design Elenwnt a. Existing City objectives_ nd policies will ho synthesized to update this element of the General Plan to generate development guidelines that focus on the identity of the City an_' t! communities and hig 'sights design ecpectati6hs,,,focal points, and historical character. b. The text work will be done in -house at tho staff level. c. $9,000.00 is available for use in coAracting outside for the preparation of original graphics... la GPA UPDATES, SCOPE OF YORK rage 3 3« St4ARA a. Recent State Iflgisj'tion has designated portions of the :;,ity as contai; ing significant raining resources. These are req' red to be incorporated into the City`s areas General plan «+1 b. Update General Plan as required to be consistent with the State Mining and Reclamation Act. Plannommission 1. Submit work program to Planning COWSSiOn at start -up as a Report to familiarize then with pro4ect's intent, Director's scope and timing. Receive direction and approval of Commission of Work Prograur: to begin prc,)ect. 2. After completion of updates, hold Planting Coemission workshop to inin_ro and review with Gt ission the scope of the updates. 3. planning Coamission to review updated documents at public hearing and forward recoowendatior, , to City Council, D. Public Participation 1« public input and comment will be solicited during.. =he public hearing portion of the General plan update. 2. Public rr�*ification will be accomplished by: a. Fostud pu,NJic notice's at various locations throughout the city. b. Arcs in f he Daily Report newspaper of at least 1/8 page in size. E. Resources: 1« City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan 2. General Plan Guidelines - 3. Planning & Zoning Laws 4. �EQA Guidelines b 7 SLAG ":•Other City pidnning Staff 8 `,Other City :� epartmen is , r 9. ,Special Districts 1tr, Other Governmental Agencies 11. Funds for Professional Contract Servic -cs 12. Other Resources as they L^ecome availaW^ r �' GPA UPDATES, SCOPE OF WORK Pagk, 4 -A III. WORK PROGRAM Task Work Schedule Sche A. Piannina Commission Review of :cope of Work September 23, 19$7 8• General Plan Update September 24 - `January 29 1• initial Review - Determine scope of updates necessary Already Cowfeted 2• Research and data collection to update document September 24 - ji`luary 29 3. Prepare revised, document ' &spt�ber 24 -:1"-d ,nuary 29 . C. General Plan EIR Update September 24 - Januaf;yr ,;9 I. Do RFP & Contract "for - __ -_ _ consultant September 24 — October 31 2. Consultant to update EIR N °ember i - January 29, 198$ D- 't-- -Wnity Design Eiemant '' Septe�p, >er 24 - January 29 I 1- Initial review September 24 - Ocr6U)r 31 2. Research & data collection Novyer - January 29 3. Prepare revised document* November 1 _January 29 MaY ificlude hiring of outside firm for p4- paration of graphics E. SMARA September September 24 - January 29 1- Initial Review 24 - October 31 2• Synthesize material & 1 Prepare draft for document review 3. Nov Mber 1 - January 29 Prepare revised docLraert, November 1 - January 29 F. Planning commission Workshop to review completed upd,�yad documents G. 3rd Week in February Planting ?xmissio� Public Hearing r' March 23, 1988 H. City Council Public Hearin, April 20, 1988 r �' ..� s 3 � � � � ���� h � � �� � � � � � o -� �- � � �� �.�, � } Date: r To: From: I Subject: Alft Ar 1\ C'TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Y.L�FF REPORT'. s �-V Septe42-�zr 23, 1387 E Members of The Planning Commission U Karen McPruire- EmEry, As „oci ate Park Platine (� Conceptual plans ?or Two Park Sites Located in the Victoria Vineyards ,North Development Conceptual Design Plana for the two Neighborhood ,Park= Sitas to be located in the Victoria Vineyards Ytorth C?�' =� inity are being submitted by the Commun ty Sery .ues� Beth Coxz sob review and comma at. RACKGRO'UND- City Staff has racesveo and Yeviewed the concept�'al development plans submitted by the Rilli.am Lyon Company Ec -fie next two Victoria Development Neighborhood. Parks. Located in the Victoria Vineyards "Xorthl, Community, the two park sites Are each approximately 7 acree in size a�i will be adjacent to two school facilities, each totaling 6.a acres.. (See Exhibits ,A &B.) Hot' park sites will include play akea toi; lots, picnicking facilities Witt-, barbecues, basketb; %11 hardcau: t fPiQlines, balifinl,ds with adequate: area provided for soccer overlays, restroom facilities, at well as on site parking. During the review of Tentative Track :3279, the Design Review CMmmittee expressed concerns that any lighting fear the parking lots 9LOuld be designed te) prevent ,glare adjacent single: family to rs., It is st aff's n the agf's intent rc take submittals this intea consideration 1e�n revierA:.a1g lighting for the project, MC- MM MA_ TION _. To review the conce;5tual development Plans for the two Victoria Vireyajrds North Park sites-and,; `. To provide direction to the Director of COMMUnity Services t:) proceed ¢.q City Cour.'cil. 1 Attach,,!ents: Exhibi.�. ,fhn Kenyon Site Exhibit aegs Vi. ^,taria Park. Lar_e Site ITEM F' k} r � ,,ray ' ; ,�� ;� • � ; � _ � ��; C.T.. • I Illjt ., ,1 t •j 4- -tr-;: 7 4 i i11k 4l1 t 1 � 1 I I t,q l �I� ' I 'h i��'k�i IMF 1 r . ! '- -L-•`, k5P �, ��'•,�t � ►-�7', f 1•'0q Ito . �j''tttl it,I 11 y � `.• !.. -:t,. ,k L„!._j' "n, q�j t' . , $m 0C O EBEE •3 3 11` 11 \ : i st "\ N //--���� { ` q�'1 tl;tlliy Vii _: ==� •L ,�C _ ��{ y , c ; I r2'tt1iltt\ i ?5 �� 4k ii Yqiq �i x37 r rr U 0 L