Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1987/12/09 - Agenda Packet
0701 -02 0 12-9-87 PC, Agenda � � 'rt •fj s -. a 'r iQAA4ge A My or, RAP aD CUM e PLA eii°1ING' ,tQM MISSION Z ,GUS WEDNESDAY December 9,1987, 7:00 p.m. n LZOM PAR'S CORMilMIT CENTER 9182 BABE IMN RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALMRNIA \ 9 L Pledge of An IL Roll can a Commissioner Blakesley _ Commissioner Emerlek Commissioner Chltiea Commissioner McNiet _ Commissioner Tolstoy _ IIL Anwm eements IV. Approves of W October 14,1987 October 28, 1987 November 10,107 V. r4w Bates A, ENVIROHMENTAL A-: E8 MENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87-52 - 30-N A - IMe development of a warehouse addition to the eaiating Pic -N-Sav distribution center totaling 564,960 square feet on 90 acres of land in the General Industrial L3striet (Subarea 14), located at 122434 Fourth 9 reet - APN: 220-283-50. VL Public .%aribgs The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wa(t to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by 'stating your name and eddreas. All such opinions;halt be limited to 3 minutes per individual for each project. B. ENVIRONMENTAL SSESSMENT ARID TEM7TAT VE'Tl3AGT 13727 - aN E;I$ - A residential subd1vbTo—n—o-f 12 single acntly to an 3.5 ;.;acres of land in the Law Residential District (2-4 dwelling units ',r sere), iaeated at the southwest corner of Carnahan �� Street and ftftlan6 Avenue -- APN: 201- 214 -11. (Continued from ri'�srember 10, 1P87.) � `� A ° C. EMYiR_ tit IEN'i. AL AS.SESSME16-ANI) TE 3TAMiE TRACT 13359 - *NA ONAJ - A— custom< lot iaiavr�+ 3. scree o 1'd to l ; parcels to the very Low Density.;`t€�ntiaal District (lass than 2. dweUbW snits per acre), located on the east aide of Sapphire h Sfaeet, south of Hillside Road - APNt 1061- 691 -8, 10 and 1'.. �U ('E'ont£nued item 111, 19,171 Related File: Marione, 11 13 \ D. ENVIRONMANTAL A',$SESSMENT AND VARIANCE 8745 \ WAL N - A request to redeye thW minimum garage lot size romM,a00 square feet in area to 21,392 square feat in area in ,. ' conjunction with a six (6) lot subdivision located on the east sides of Sapphire Street, south of Hillside Road - APN: 2061-691-It and 11,. (Continued from November 10, 1987.) Related File. - .'.Tentative Tract 13359. F- iiN MONMENTAL ASSESSMENT' AND CONDITIONAL USE FERRMT 9 M- -w F W - The development of a 8.2 acre integratedshopp ig tenter consisting of 4 retail buiidinga totaling 87,581 square feet in the Community Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at the southeast corner of Foothill "Boulevard and Hellman Avenue - APN: 208-261-58. Continued from November 10,1987,1� 1 F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13748 - 0-U mm- HO - A resrden al subdivWon &A design review o s igle amily Iots on 65 acres of land in the Law- Medium Residents, -,i District (M8 dwelling units per aerel, located at ..'te northwest corner of - APN: A Highland Avenue and Milliken Avenue - portion of 201 171 -55. Associated with the project is a Tree Removal permit requesting the removal of 19 mature trees. (Continued from November 25,1987.) G. EOVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL M MAN-MR D LO MENT CAA sui ivision of acres of land iota parcels in .,,ems - Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located at the, southwest f corner of Milliken Avenue and Banyan Street APN: 2d1-271- 55. (Continued from November 25, 1987.) H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMEND - T -04G - TAC D L M NT - A request to amend the Gemmrai Plan Use Slap from Loft- Medium F-sidential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to High Residential (?4- a0 dwelling units per acre) for 5.05 acres of land, located on -the ^� south side of Bane Line Road, crest of Archibald- APN 208 -0831= 18, 19. ( Continued from November 25,1987.) �I 1 1 �AVISONMZNTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT -O5 - TAC DEWLOPIVIENT A request to amens the Development Districts Map from Low - J 1 (� v Medium (4 S dwelling units per acre) to Higti Residential (24-30 dweltIr laifits per ,&cre) :attached with the Senior Housing Overlwy Disixiut (SOD) to the brae district for 5.05 acrs of land, located on the sout►t s1de of Base wine Road, west of Archibald Avenue - APX 20"31-19, (Contir ued from IT vember 25,1987.), � L ENVIRONMENTAL!", ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN - AMEW]� E TT i4H - 1`A ; D VELO;PMENT - A CBgtiest to amend the LAW Use Mement of We General Plan from Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Olfice for 1.69 acres of land, located on the wrest side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Lute Road - APN: 208 -031 17, 54, 55, 58 and 57. (Continued from November 25, 1987.) v T AND DEVELOPMENT ENVIitON`I'TAL ArSKEN - { l N—fENT87 -06 TAC request to the "Development Tiistrlots Map from Low- ,, % ibnd Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Office Professional for 1.69 acres of 'And, located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Bee Line Road - APN: 208 -031 -17, 54, 55, 58,ana 57. (Continued from November 25, 1987.) J. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMT3NT 87 -02 - TAC DEVELCIONENT - A +I Development Agreement between the City of Ranc!:o Cucamonga TAC Development Corporation for the purpose of providing a faand Senior Housing Project per 03 requirements of the Senior dousing Overlay District (Section 17.20.040 of the Development Code, Ordinance 211) for 170 apartment units to be located on the south " side of Baser ,ye Road, rarest of Archibald Avenue - APN; 208 -, 031-18, 19. (Continued from November 25, w987.) K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 10783 - WELLS FARGO BANK - A division of 11.3 acres of land into 2 parcels in ffie Very Low (2 dwelling units per acre) Development District, located at the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and iiMside Road ° APN: 1061- 561 -03. L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDMONAL USE PERMIT 87-41 - ALTA LOMA SCHOOL DISTRICT - The development of a school district ecility consisting of a 10,5:0r sTAre foot administration binding; a 18,170 square foot warehouse building, and a 15,600 square foot transpuriationlmaintenance building on 5.25 acres of land in the U,w Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located on tha east side of Beryl Stmt, south of 19th Street - APB 202 041 -01 and 42. Associated wit'i thq' -aeveloprnent is ti Tree Removal Permit requenting th* removal � f four 4) mature trees. M. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMMT D VARIANCE 87 -16 - BOX - A, request to inereaft the height o an apertniolTV m one story to two storm► rrtUft 100 feet of adjoining angle *emit :q rasidenow for a proposed 20 unit apartment project on 1.10 -ea oI 1 A in the Medium-High Imidenttel ni-Atrict (14-24 dwelling mils per sere), located at tiie termhanes of Sierra Madre Avenue and Main Street - APNt IOZ -251 ZS. Yd ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTAT'It+� TRACT 12E20 . G. A residentla subdivision *-f 16 xinglss f,;*Iww l+ts ems acres of land in the Low Reatdentiai Dbtrict (2-1 dwrMng units per acre ), located at the southeast over a^ Jasper 'verst and IliWpond Avenue - APNt 201-2"-10. O. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13303 -° �. W ► _ reeiljent at�subd oa eta l design re~ view of 96 0`m IOU 4o ' 8 ` aWres of 1" 11h the Terra VIA& Plannee i 3omtnunliy Iat , "LMw, located at the southwest corner of Team Vista Park 'Way and Mountain View Drive - APNt 227-161-13 and 14. P:, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CUSTOM LOT �M3ACT 1 V E LX N CO. - res entiod v on cif 1 S A, em %ts.on es acr of lend in the hour - Medium (4-8 ftelft uauts p*Fjt re) District, located-north of Bate Line between Milliken sod Roc'` -Ater within the Victoria Planned Community - Ak t 227- 021-b. Q. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW W. R R . - e development of an int rirot —F shopping center consisting of four major retail buildings totaling 319,000 square feet, adjoining mall shops totaling 137,395 square fee-, nlrA satellite reta +I buildings totaling 43,550 9q feet, two satellite office build-legs totaling 27,325 "tare feet, four restaurant pads, and a 30,OQO square foot theater. Conceptual approval for a design center consisting of ten buildings totaling 195,660 square feet. All on 71 acres of lanai in the Community Commovelal District of the Terra Vista Planned Community located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Foothill, Boulevard - APNt 1077 - 421 -05, 06, 13. M R. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA PLANNED c,ommuwrr AM NDhI N - WZMN PORAMEN --A request to charge the land use designat one ram Park (OP) and Commercial (C) to Community Commercial (CC) iavoivhV a 71 acre parcel within the Terra�Vista Planned Community, loathed on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Haven Avenue and Spruce Avenue - APF% 1-'t7-421-5, 6, 13. 11 11 S. VIIL L:O +_ This tz tics tiaras and ialacs for the genco±ai pk:dtc to a ires<s t?4e Commis bfu Items to b +ditisausaed her`a are those whtch do not already appear on this agenda. X. ANIJOLLOUIEWMa, s The PWMir �j Commission has adopted Administrative Ragt datims that ' sot an 11 iz m. adocuttrnent time. ' items , ixevond that tL^ne, they shall ix: hoard only v9th the eont rj y the Ccrrtmfss s i".i � �i►�i11� . illitl. i w }{ i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM011 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE:' ' December S. 1987 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission. FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Chris Westman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -52 PIC-9-ME THE aevelopmenE or a warehouse a on o e ex sing Pic -N -Save distribution center totaling 564,964 square feet on 90 acres of nand in the General Industrial and Heavy industrial I.-istricts (Subarea 14 and 15), located at 12434 4th Street - APH,: 229 - 283 -50. 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Actian Re uested: Approval of site plan and elevations and the ssui ace" a Negative Delaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zonin`` ort - Sournern California r orn a son generation statiov, Subarea 15 (Heavy industrial) South Vacant,M -2 (Ontario) East - Vacant, Subarea 14 and 15 (General Industrial and Heavy Industrial) West - Industrial, Subarea 14 and 15 (General Industrial and Heavy Industrial:) , - - C. General Plan Designations ro ec i- e -: vieral Lifflustrial and Heavy Industrial North - Heavy '.. ndustrial South - M -2 (Ontario) East - :General Industrial and Heavy Industrial West - General Industrial and Heavy Industrial D. Site Characteristics : The site contains an existing warehouse of square f eet and a retail outlet. The proposed expansion is to., the north where there is vacant land. There are no unusual site constraints. Off -site improvements for 4th Street were done during the construction of the existing buildings. Street improvements have been completed for 6th Street at the north property boundary, however landscaping and driveways have not been provided. ITEM A rp- », -� .., .a-rr ,°^x^• P^- rte' ;;"' ± . ,. e PLANNING CV"- 29TON $T4FF REPORT f DR 87 -52 -Pic- N-Seve ' December 9, 1987 Page 2 E. Parking Calculations: Number of Nu tir of 'Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use footage Ratio Re uq fired Provided Warehouse 564,960' 1)4000 141 244 H. ANALYSIS: A. General: This type of use is consistent with surrounding uses and the zoning district in which it is located, The protect is in conformance with the Industrial Specific Plan and ti,a provisions of the General Plan. The project has been reviewed by Design and Technical Revi;tw Committees. B. Design Review Comments: The Design. Review Comnitte CChitiea, tic liel, 1angj" reviewed' the project on December 3, 1987 and forwarded it- to the Planning Commission with the following recomwendatiogs: 1. Extensive landscaping subject to City Planner approval should be provided along the 6th Street frontage which will effectively screen the site to the-south. Accent planting should be provided at the 6th Street project entry. 2. A native ground cover should be planted on either side of the driveway a minimum of 8 feet leading to the warehouse from 6th Street. 3. A textured paving such as exposed aggregate should be used for the pedestrian connection -from the northern parking lot to the warehouse. 4. Additional treatment should be provided on the building face and landscaping provided at the stairway for the employee entrance on the north building face. S. A passive employee plaza should be provided at the landscape area between the north auto and truck parking arels. Amenity emphasis should be placed on landscaping. 6. Trees should be provided at a rate of 1 per 3 parking stalls within the employee parking area. The wells should be curbed and irrigated. r -off- pgt Is 011 in E Y � � PL 1i6"F•.: REPpRT DR -t -faire Neces�sar 9s; °I987 Page 3 4- K` G. EnvironeenNO M ?sessaAent: Parts I and II of tt +e Initial S-tuo ave en o�p z. a no urnitigutible significant impacts have been found related to the construction of the proposed building. . '_II. FACTS FOR FTMINt, �L, . the proposed use is consistent with" the Hera -an an " ft I-In*iStrial Specific Plan. The building design and site plan together- with recommended conditions of apprqq*,Il, are in cowpliancc: with the Industrial Specific Flan and ai'i ` other applicable City Sundards. IV. REC"ENDATIUN.• Staff recoase►.ds that the Mann U9 Comission approve evTopntnt Review 87 - -52 'tnd Issue a Negative'Declaration through adoption of the attacheu, Resolution of Approval with conditions. Res fully u tted, p B u� e City l annex BB:Cti /• vc Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Elevations "D" -• Conceptual Landscape Plan Resolution of Approval 1. NMTH ITEM= _e8-7. , EXHIBIT -_ _ SCALE.- ��' i Ll CITY CF RA:NUM CUCAMONCA PI. MING DIVISM A _- r d 1 GlYL.4G' I a O wu�r:mr �i CITY CF RAN�,I-TO C ITE11i= - cr %E =, T10 R ANNING DIVMN SCALE. � 0 _777- Pic, AMP --air.. 4. �m- NORM CITY OF ME% RLUiO CUCAMONGA TrrLE, PLANNING D(VIRON EXHIBrr.- SCALE, - mom sum- �m- NORM CITY OF ME% RLUiO CUCAMONGA TrrLE, PLANNING D(VIRON EXHIBrr.- SCALE, - DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ff&AFF REPORT o December 9, 1987 1977 Chairman and Membe,,s of the Planning `Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Chris Westman, Assistant Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSES90T AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -52 - Ydi -F: bA t ine aeve!opmerm or a warehouse aaa7tion to Fe "slr'ing Pic -N -Save �!istribution centeraialing 60 square feet on 9a= -dcres of land in the General trial and Heavy Industrial Districts (Subarea 14 and 154 located at 12434 '4th Street - APR: 229- 283 -50. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Retested: Approval of site plan and elevations and the Issuance or a"Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zonin or - Southern California Edison generation station, Subarea 15 (Heavy Industrial,) South - Vacant,M -2 (Ontario) East - Vacant, Subarea 14 and 15 (General Industrial and Heavy Industrial) West - Industrial, Subarea 14 and iv (General Industrial and Heavy Industrial) C. General Plan Designations: ro ec e - General Industrial and Heavy Industrial North - Heavy Industrial South - 14-2 (Ontario) East - General Industrial and Heavy Industrial West General Industrial and Heavy Industrial D. Site Characteristics: The site contains an existing warehouse of , square eet and a retail outlet. The proposed expansion is to the north where there is vacant land. There are no unusual site constraints. Off-site-improvements for 4th Street were done during the construction of the existing buildings. Street improvements have been completed for 6th Street at the north property boundary, however landscaping and driveways have not been provided.' ITEM A ., A PLANNING' COMMI'SSI.ON STAFF REPORT DR 87 -52 - Pic-m -Save December 9, 1987 Page 2 - E. Parking Calculations: Number of Numl, >) of Type square Parking apace? Spaces of use Footage Ratio Re fired Provided Warehouse 664,960 1/4000 141 244 H. ANALYSIS: A. General.` this type of use is consistent with surrocnding uses and-We—zoning district in which it is located. The project is In conformance with" the Industrial Specific Plan and the provisions of the General. Plan. The project has beer- reviewed by Design and Technical R0,1view Committees. i B. Design Review Ca nts• `0 Design Review Committe (Chitie., MsN1e1, ong ) reviewev the 'project Ott Desember 3, 1:987 and forwarded it to the running Ci mission with the following recommendations: 1. Extensive landscaping subject',:to City Planner approval should be provided along the 6th Street frontage which will effectively screen the 'site to the south. Accee planting should be provided at the 6th Street project entry. A na%r.5e ground cover should be panted on eit!`_---r side of the driveway a minfiaw of 8'feet leading.to the ►:arehovse from 6th Street. 3. A textured paving such as expased aggregate should be used for the pedestrian connection from the nortikarn parking lot - to the warehouse. 4. Additional treatment should be provided on the building fave and landscaping provided at the stairway for the employee entrance Aon the north building face. S. A passive employee plaza should be '\provided at the landscape area between the north auto and truck . Pdrking areas. Amenity emphasis should be;'placed on landscaping. 6. Trees should be pr(.1, "ded at a rate of 1 per 3 parking stalls within the employee parking area. The wells should be curbed-and irrigated, 0 ' PLANNING COWiSSION STAFF REPORT 71, JR 87 -5E 8 Pic N -Steve c December 9, 1987 a Page 3 - III' i jjj i f C„ Environmental N"essment° -Parts I and II of tde initial Study - nave Dean completed and no unmitigatible significant; impacts ` have been found related to the construction of the proposed building. III. FACTS FOR FINDTNG-S: The proprsed use is consistent with the , General an anUTteie'Industrial Specific Plan. The building d6sign and site plan togethee with recommended itondttions of approval! are 1 In compliance with the Industrial and all tither applicable C,'�� Standards. , IV. RECOWENDATION.' Staff recommends that the Plaviiing Commission approve -, eveip it Review 87 -52 and issue a, MeC,.:gyve Declaration, _ through" adoption of the attached Resolution 6f ;�-pproval with s; :onditions. Res fully u matte „, "k Brad- u e City Planner ' Attach- r-Its: Exhibit A” - L"'Ation Map Exhibit "V - Site Plan Exhibit - F;levations zxh :vat "D" — Conceptual Landscape Plan "- Resol v „ion of Approval q iL INNING DIE. nTLE d -41 E`ml _� TH STIR 1,4 ev- Ira- t, Y, r � i z re � r T 9 j I I iIEtI�, � NNit{ CITY OF PUNNM .[IVMON mc" V," CITY OF P -�� CUCAMCP�'-- PLANNM NVOON TrIU. FAHIBrr.- --C.-,,SCALE- A-4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V SAVE !AANCHO CKAMONGLA. CAUFOF&JA NORTH clr� ll� ITEM. RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE. CJAXM_Id. I MM665 RA� PLANNING DIVMN EXHIBIT, SCALE- A-1 a. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V SAVE !AANCHO CKAMONGLA. CAUFOF&JA NORTH clr� ll� ITEM. RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE. CJAXM_Id. I MM665 RA� PLANNING DIVMN EXHIBIT, SCALE- A-1 RESOLUTION NO. r RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNIW COMMISSION 'APPROVI6G DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 87 -52, LOCATED AT 12434 4TH STREET IN THE GENERAL. INDUSTRIAL AND "EA`YY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT - APH: 229- 283 -50 A. Recitals. _ (i) Pic -N -Save has filed an application for the approval of Development Review No. 87 -52 as described ,in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) _� on the 9th of December, 146 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting ;on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. )!; (iii)1 legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have-occurred, B. Resolution. NON, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, ined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting on-December 9, 1987, including rtritten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds os follows;; (a) The application applies to property located at 12434 4th Street. uses. _(b) The proposed project is ccr41atible with surrounding land 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission' during the above - referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as foll.aws: (a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and (b) That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and A-9 =' `" PLANNING COMMISSION RESdi.ilTION 'kO'.- DR 877-"'r P'ic -N -Save - Dece �, 1987 Page, ' s' (c) That the proposed use is in compliAnce with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and (d')' That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 2970 and, ° further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the `findings and cbrmclusion'• set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and, in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and inco;;,`)rate�d herein by this reference. Planning Division (aY A formal grading plan shall be submitted and approved by the Building and Safety Division prior to the issuance of any permits. (b) Extensive landscaping subject to City Planner approval shall be provided along the 6th Street frontage which Will effectively screen the site to the soufi. Accent planting shall be provided at the 6th Street project entry. (c) A native ground cover shall be planted on either side of the driveway a minimum of S feet leading to the warehouse from 6th Street. (d) A textured p4ing such as exposed aggregate shall be used for the pedestrt n connection from the northern parking lot to the warehouse. i (e) Additional treatment shall be provided of the building face and landscaping provided at the stairway for the employee entrance on the north building face. (f) A passive employee plaza shall be provided at the landscape area between the north auto and truck parking areas. Amenity emphasis shall be placed oim landscaping. (g) Trees shall be provided at a rate of 1 per 3 parking stalls within the employee parking area. The wells shall be curbed and irrigated. ,M J j PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 87 -82 - Piicw4 Save December 9, 1987 Page 3 Engineering Division _;, (a) The existing overhead utilities (telecM'Unications and electrical) on the project side of 4th Street shall be undergrounded from the first pole off -site east of the project east boundary to the first pole off -site west of the project's bOundarY. Reimbursement of 1/2 of the'City adapted fee is not feasible because the property located on the southside of 4th St"Oet is located in the City of Ontario. (b) The drive approach on 6th Str4,!t shall be constructed at a minimum of 35 feet wide at the,--gftt -of -way line. f (c) The storm drain systems s'raiI be constructed subject to revi" and approval: of the City Engineer and the Building Official The study shall cover possible mitigation measures for increased`, run -off due to the proposed development. 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. i APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1487. PLANNING COWISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO cuCAMONGA BY: Larry T. MCNIel, a rman ATTEST. �) Brad Buller, emu y ecre ry I1/ I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of i,I'e City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution vas duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning CommiF� ion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning CoOid ission held on the 9th day of December, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: CDMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IM k IiJ a i � U ^•- 'ma P�� €o 1 a a «o si CO'Y yLN =TY � r _, � Yy }�iK Mi.Y'�Vy n � .{t Mme- S Y 4M �.. ' to a C.'•�.. � giT +�'3 M+i O'�i�t.�t�"a �a� ^¢gipp',, t « w cry!. I i/ J ~ •� G' 1.2 I Ti1lC� I M% su O rt Mitt yLti�+ iw y ae 6r�.Ngaay e L yY y s D .ii y aY YC�..�f7i�Yw Y ■y T• N C 4 JLs.. N M Y . »i^ 8 �rrrpppIgoppp •6r0 ~• ma y V i lu w ` Y Pit 1 yC la a 4a I .q; L - Y JV C a CpOp t�'� 4eG p OY��N t •� Lf -Ts a�Cw o qV y;• � d i y Y �1 �.s y �_ .S 9 �.r �MM.N66l.lV4pNLM.w K • W •V.• iw ic 14 �t� J ,� N ^ +. .`, \rte -jI • 4 r t . it W €a� $ ieu . �I ; O wY� 7 . i .2 L �•a s�i•$ g o T C _rtt Q° N Y d y u Ny� BOYS L G yL < . C d W dos A 411a4 `�� O1it.. yt OM fx -ENif Nilc r g M wA ^� 'w YV�y L g�a N �6 NO MM y L tab uTL .,T l 9 kO V V~ ° CF 2\ N S 3 $i 1py�;�{yg� L 4 ~ � ial Y A 'ilk g X a L . as[ MY X TL 9`y~ w gV 6 ar3 e N Oq� t1 Y ^ � -q IE dj ee ■■ furli M+ i i!• u7 I! lit �N�t'qo M ` s7sassy Y� NMYI�tl YY w_ TL x -Z a ��Y3sr Nrgs� !q C w C N Li p�Y- Y CV� s .off u�T�rL vy yO �4C w A Ts t I pLp y Mp O y i N wV O �T LC °Cl}}oW.n.� 11 E.J 11 Ni r W W 11 O i 0 C X O G G Ate OOOO�wl. µtxwV L ditl Sy �d �w a Y•' i-4 i6 V !S VN ✓ �< riN ^ cO 1�O QEwL G O Q o 0 R DTI � Y� N� Li ' y O •` izs N y{,. Lp ^ fig It. = ji- ji g TZ V •m +: w"fyl ti�s�i�� SSki t yNyLL M .� 41 Ij N.l.M1lIM <M.� <N =M• I�K� <N Yuri O�MNO L 3 �a�� .Lia yN .".bsi 71 NyLk 4^ Ns � Lw�iity Y 231 y S yy y� yyC CC wC q++ pyL '•• Z� tM O L N6G ROi +.. ■ME LYE C 1 !! N.w L 6 _ ■ OYC i ` 6 d �_ L �d•a, ! C N y � �aLy V�M^ �� Y' B V =y��A � `qO 4 QyY� YYyQ CA` ,� y pi�� � �� i yy9y = L�O{ a =•$p�� p �y 6 d Y Lr.� ■■ +• pp ce � �� C} N i i t� tl g L TL yw• Y N IL= ^ 4 a N ^+ yM 4 QN • ` Y tl G.C� yy 4.6 M.'0 i p� �) • S iay LOO �O Cq Yr. �. iY d��yy�e.�j:. sle e V p tV�:pa �Ltl� YLY •YV1e +fQ �rC. CytyO EY i 6! Vr+ i^ +�YD {1pY�CCt po+ Lw C M v +Y MV (p� N y Y8 •a ,C py � L'.� ��4^ N r\OC ypJpJ1 yVYq�n ^N{ ^,S ^y uS �Nw N -iV. oVo +9 cq i4C s C\. y SriL NV +� ^� Y VI Oy LyWt1 ^. Y yI Z ' ^v 6N0w. Y'��O L a6. plea ga M^ sCYVV 'f QN��.M C. YCy +C�tS�. i' Cyi y1 O� tiVYLM N Mi +CY NC6 V <.s+go \` M � � C w N f•! ! �e1C .p'. i V a jft J? ✓ - _ 133! 14 ;m « 1z W �a 600 LOO �� I �— NY O ■ O YY� MN Eli M. I Y f, Lo g 3 ww w_ q ti Y `_ail a %N W ` q p pp HAS y e« `p w o OI O✓ ✓ Y;H� «Ne� NJ7 1 n ; as ✓ Y y== 6 {L�Y� L ✓�Q TL L �' Z NY! may. ¢l .".i Q�j. ✓qY cN«rLy �G � � ` " • y� `yp ^y? �p. L L "M,« yO�O s -5. N�i^ ��'i,✓ Y�pC .�y {Y�FY• °f"wL a�� M p ��d1! yy e e i No. ■ N yN}$ CC � 11 L Jam " ✓ t^ - L ice^ ( ■� �� O6 OSr izA a p ti Wit iG« .N. S Z a 0 «tl^ �9 G�T�M pYtgy` Ys .� � • Y�'.Of 310 �Y N�wC y`!Y }..g■ qq_6 O gi aYi � '~ � �¢��Tj N u O ■a � In O~ M C t� Y �j ti S -lift Og O ` $ 4 L Ci O� a ,N y Mi Ld Y lg3 S.K Oi1H HTE i �•T 'L mayy♦` ' �►�t � Y Ord Y j jjj lit .. y. ~• ".0 �� ay a+pi 0s Oi. 0;4 .+..aY �Nyj`nON prOt NM O� Sa �� ♦R'Wj �O Nyaa� �� !`�+ /.� "LT Y��.. ■�� a i llw0::� y9y9 p.Q� YMYfii ytl cC —vil _�� aS 01'p3 ;i sjk tea! % Y a�i O M tj.. a Yyli Sy G N Cep■p■ _Yy1♦ L'3N CCU �'fY�+.L LL.W�'�y{ Y M WY$ f +1 ec N�Y)3^}Y� 1uNV WY(.i �['i ii�G7 1C� �.��!(T It Ali ,ykj �iV�N �iNiWMM. �000iC1 N 1'f Y ♦ N !f 9 N .! aL �� DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT. GI'1"Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA K.AFF REPORT December 9, 1987 Chairman ana Members of the Kanning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Scott Murphy, Associate planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASS SSMENT AND TEHTAT11E: TRACT 13727 dAwssa" - A resyhentlal supdfv s�C,z Or 1Z single a�mily- o s on .53 acres of land in the Low hkxwenfiia7 District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) , located ' at -at: „ thwest corner o €„ Carnelian Stra�\t and Highland Avenue - APR 201- 214 -11. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Ap{ roval of subdivis'gn design, conceptual, gra gn plan, an T issuance of a Negative;uzclaration. B. Project 0entV. 3.4 dwel lit g units per acre, C. Surrounding 'nand Use and Zoning: North - single family. Residential; Lori Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) South - .Future Foothill Freeway; Low Residential atielling units per acre) Eas`. - Vacant; Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acrd West - Vacant; Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per act-e) D. General Plan Desi rations: o ec 51 e - Low Kesi_,2'ential (2.4 dwelling units per .cre) North - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) South - Freeway East - Low Residential (2 -4 duelling units per acre) West - Low. Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) E. Site Coaracteristics• The site is currently vacant with an average-slope o' scent from north to south. - The project is bounded on the south by the future Foothill Frrdeway, on the north by Highland Avenue, and on the east by Carnelian 'Street,`` ITEM B' s 6. PLANNING Ctk4!LISSION STAFF REPORT i TENTATIVE TRACT 13727 - JANSSENS December 9, 1987 Page 2 �r II. ANALYSIS: p A. Back - round: On October 24, 1984, the Planning Commission appr`Conditional Ilse, permit to develop the site as a church facility. The plans consisted of ,a 6,400 square foot sanctuary and two 2,250 square foot multi - purpose ";buildings. The church has since decided not to use the :site dnd to sell the property. 8. General: The appli ^ant is arupesing to develop 12 lofts ranging in size from 7,714 square feet to 13,038 square ft�et in area. The average lot size within tE)a tract is 9,895 square feet in area. The tract iy designed with a cul -de -sac at the east end of the site serving four (4)` ::its and an L.`shaped street on the . western half of the site serving eight (8) lots and providing a, connection for the property to the west. No dwelling units are being proposed At this ,cize. C. 0 "esi n Review Committee• Rise Design Review Committee j8laKeSley, c e., '�, er� reviewed the proposal on August 20, 1987. At that tune, the Committee recommended the following conditions be attached to the project; 1. Deco -ative block walls should be pr-)vided along Highland Avenue and Carnelian Street and along all r;orner side yard;. , 2. Landscaping should be provOed between the sidewalk 1 and the wall along all corned side yards. 3. Lot 1 should take access off of the street to the south, 4. Lot 8 should take access off of the street to the west. In addition, much discussion during the meeting focused on the wall along the south tract boundary recoownded by the ar,,ustical engineer to mitigate the potential noise from the Foothill Freeway. The acoustical analysis indicated that an 11 foot high wail (as mbasured from the building pad elevation) would be necessary at the west end of the site ,tapping down to 10 feet high at the east end of the site. The Committee expressed concern over the impact that a wall of this size would have on the future resleiints. T'he:Comt£ttee also expressed concern about the aesthetics of the wall as viewed from Carnelian Street. In addition to the 10 to it foot high sound wall, a retaining wall is proposed r. PLAWRING MMSSIOM STAFF REPORT TEkTATIVE 11MT 13727 - JANSSENS December s, 1987 j Page 3 along the south tract boundary. The necessity of the,retaining _ ,.all stems from the insufficient distance bitw -an the future:. , on -ramp and the tract boundary causing a retaining wail ranging from zero to seven t7} feet in height. This, in combination With the sound wall, results in an overall wail hefgtt of P between 10 and 18 feet above the existing grade.: The impact of the wall is Further compqunded by the Freeway being depressed In tens area. Due to the significant height of the proposed wail, the Design Review Committee made the following reccmendations: 1, , -. A profile of the wall shou` 4 'zprovided for Design Review,Compitt•?e review. 2. A design for the gall shouln c ,submitted for Design Review Committee review prior to the Plahn,ng Commission meetipa. The design should include the type of material(," color, retained planter boxes, vertical landscape materials, and/or other features necessary to mitigate the impact of the wall from both thc-,north and the south viewrs. 3. Caltrans siould be contacted to explore the possibility of installing landscaping within the freeway right -of -way. ,subsequently, the Design Review Comittee reviewed the wain design and recommended approval subject to the wall being stucco with a fluted split face cap, 0. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee rev ewe a propose art 7-rst IS, 1987 and noted cne area of the tract that is not- co�isistent with City ;'.tandards and_ policies -- existing overhead utilitias. There are overhead utilities located on the opposite side of Carnelian Street. As a result, an in -l'1eu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the utility tines on the apposite side of Carnelian Street will be required. The amount of the fee will be one -half the adopted amount times the length from the center Of Hi'pland Avenue to the center of the future freeway right- of-way. With this additional item being addressed and other conditions of eoproval, the- reohnical Review Committee determined that the tract is in caw,,,t: ,race with applicable City standards and policies. i fe E] PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 13727 - JANSSFNS December 9., 1987 Page 4 E. Environmental Assessment: The applicant has completed Part I of e MIMI Study. Staff has completed Part, 2 and identified one, area of potential adverse impact - noise. Due to the proximity of the site to the future Foothill Freeway, the tract will be exposed to noise levels in excess of City standards. An acoustical analysis has been submitted to address possible mitigation measures to reduce the noise to a level of a less than significant impact. Based on the recorimendations of the report, a sound wall along the south tract uoundary ranging in height from 11 feet (as measured from the building pad elevatita) at the west end stepping dowr�to ten (10) feet at the east end of the site would be necessary to reduce the noise level below 65 CNEL (the City maximum), kith the inclusion of the recommendations of the 'acoustical analysis, staff finds that the project, together ;f(th the conditions of approval, will not have a significant f�pact on the environment. If the Planning Commission cdncurs,'Y:ssuance or a Negative Declaration mould be appropriate. III. FACTS FOR FIND14GS: The project is pgnsisteA with the General an an Development Code. The project will not be detrimental to the public health or safety, o- cause nuisances or significant adverse environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use and site plan, together with the recommended Conditions of Approval, are in compliance with applicable provisions of the Development Code and City standards. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in the Daily :;e ort newspaper as a public hearing and notices have been sen o a property owners within 300 feet of the site. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve lentative Tract 13727 through adoption of the attached Resclution with conditions and issue a Negative Declaration. Res ally it d, f, i Bra B .ld / City 0 annex BB:SM:ns Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Subdivision Map Exhibit "C" - Grading Plan Exhibit "D" - Master Plan Exhibit "E" - Letter from Application Resolution of Approval with Conditions RMr I? -I� Ji I7PiCi O ;fit Zph4 R••i -N i O, W /e4- 87) Tr" SST NO' *90 (MS 130/71 -73) XGW[, R -J—y r IL--- --1-t - -- {-- ll - , f _ r- ;-- r� [ r --t- -- -- -- t� {ter -- --t� �:- --{-- yr- 1 -A , _ --°r' �i _t ---� --� • -•-+ �- ---y -- I _,.,fi_ I' _� i � __ 1 (• _� I r--�� _� =-•mow I I iMrasrr err I I i I efivr Or WAY __ 1 .i� L L Y' I It • I t I' I I 1 -� i �,� ► T 4y t t i I I y T1U6r 102 ,:ri. 4 �'pt arts► -�� zaac� ko-t I I ( i `tt *A *Ti I Y N( T13t.E= PLANNING D(vjS>ifl!'t' TITLE-4T SCALE. 8 -,� E. S. 1 111 �r Nk WTI CITY..�r RANCHO � ITLtiI� �..�►:�rA TITLE : EXHI[AT- SC ALL.,. L All r j I its lo 1 41, .. MRnAws It 4. lilt CITY' OF I T EN I - RANCHO CUC-� NJONGA PLANNING Dwsm TITLE: EXHIPAT- SCALE { 7-LT t i p � i a � I i t{ }j r I j I � ! I t t. t SI i I � • t t I t a - r I � t a I I 1 ! I CITY OF ITEM: TITM PLAtiNL% IX 'SnN EXHIBIT:S° SCALD 64 l S• _ d f U, C6 H I � I o� 1 t f t i 2 f 5 f f 1 w t I e ' 1 t 1 a i f i t 1 ti I � 1 ' I . � t . I 1 ,I t t ! R CITY CF ITI=.\t: 17,Za CU" NGA TITLE PLr1N:1 M. I nrbioN EXHIBIT - :ALI;: w ! — %-- -_ -cf 71 i�I M)RTJ CITY OF rrE%I- RA:�CFK) CU TITLE! PL. `ti!' E "HiFAT- SCALL wit, I mg CITY OF RA:�CFK) CUC-mmoN, , (-A TITLE! PLANNINC "--P- EX HiFAT- SCALL f1 ` P.Q. Box 1361 'IoWRovra. cA 91016 (819) 358-8673 l'�IrY t3F ii.�ICklCS C,�4AhQOf'if�4 �`-); .: EGt's 021,387 S�A� _ r AN 2 Mr. Scott Murphy j City of Rancho Cucamonga .', 9320 $aselino I. �r F a Rancho CucamongZ 'CA. 94130 �( 4. Dear Scott, It has been requested of me that I pay SOX of i @, ` undergrounding cost of the power lines facing my project ° TR 13727 across Carnelian Ave. The distance of the undergrounding for which I would ha?e responsibility runs from -t" y middle of Highland'/ Ave. to Lhe middle of the pripposed freewa "' the south of TR 13727. ANK As this is a very serious burden for a 12 home tract, and since Caltr;,�ns will automatically underground all lines crossing their right of way, may I request that this requirement be amended to my undergrounding from the center of highland to the Southerly property line of TR 13727. This amendment would still leave L significant cost to be absorbed by 12 homes, but the effe A will be less crippling. I thank you fotfconsidering this urgent request. Sic 1y, Eric A JansCrns i l 11 r RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13727, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 12 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS 0:: 3.53 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HIGHLAND AVENUE AND CARNELIAN STREET IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAr DISTRICT -- - APR: 201- 214 -11 A. Recitals. (i) Eric Janssens has filed an application Aor the approval of Tentative Tract ;tap No. 13727 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is re`-rred to as "the application". (ii) On the 9th of December, 1987, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing 'on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.. B. Resolution. NON', THEREFORE, it 7s hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commis' %ion during the ,above- referenced public hearing on December 9, 1987, includi written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: - (a) The application applies to property located A- 'the southwest corner of Highland Avenue and Carnelian Street with a street frontage of 69S feet ant lot depth of 273 feet and is presently vacant; and (b) The property to the north, south, east and west are zoned for residential uses. fie property to the north is developed with single family residences and the property to the south, east and west are currently vacant. The property to the south is the future Foothill Freeway.'< (c) The project, with the recommended conditions of approval, complies with all minimum development standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and (d) / The develM- ent of 12 single family lots on 3.53 acres of land is consistent with th6 Low Residential land use designati'6n of the General Plan. e �f PLANNING COMISSION'RESOLUTION NO. TT 13727 - JANSSENS December 9, 1987 Page 2 3. . Based V the substantial evidence presented to this' ommission during the above referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts sit forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and conclu6,ss as follows; (a) 'That tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (b) The design and improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Devel_ooent Code, and specific plans; and rn�e site is physically suitable for the type of development ;: roposed; and (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial;, environmental damage and avoidable injury humans and wildlife or their habitat; and (e) The tentative tract is likely to cause serious public health problems; and (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that tie project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 11 2 and 3 above, this Commission 1-.:reby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. (a) Planning Divft on i. Dec_grative block walls shall be required alon:T Highland Avenue, Carnelian Street, and all corner side yards. The location and design of the walls shall be shorn on the final landscape , plan W6 is subject to review and approval by the City Planner prior to?� ='the issuance of building ,rermits. 8-13 W -1 11 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 13727 - JANSSENS December 9, 1987 Page 3 ii. Landscaping shall be required between the sidewalk and the wall on all corner side yards. 'Wo -final landscape plans shall be reviewed/,and approved by Vi City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. iii. The driveway on Lot 1 shall take access off of the street to the south. iv. The driveway on Lot 8 shall take access off of the street to the west. v. A sound wall, as required by the acoustical analysis, shall be tgstalled along the south tract boundary. The wall shall be stucco with fluted split face block cap. The final design of the wall shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Ctwittee prior to recordation of the final maw:. vi. A final acoustical analysis shall bwi required to identify necessary mitigation meassres i:o ' reduce the noise levels within the r2sidencks below 45 CNEL. The report shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to thy, issuance of building permits. 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. MUM, Mairman ATTEST. Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary Y, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of December, 1987, by the fo`.lowing vote -to -wit: AY ES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMF:ISSIONERS: ABSENT: C SSI-I ' S: a PC 49a.NtiiN Y v T, YWy LUVOtltl «} CG04{� ,p q,s{ �Yv NdM tl01 •UP {, xKYL tlr ' sLYyrw C yy^ -9_d La NCB �� Lpa q „�� tl�w ,DN � NppZ1''�C�Y11O IMO 6V ”" � wCYp�Y >w }D h.psdyal OfLN j {�C^� rN y °'C Z32 CLi�L O CuL Y �M[[. Lr. �C 157. �..,Y ■ �a Cid Cr OLi^ p4y0. wp � _y&,I n�]40'q YO7n�.�N 4 Cy"d w+Nb �w+g n�lj 6; p. R qN ppV C Uj� Ei�'rV'Y �YOS{�ai 01^ NL�LD nAV ;s si p�p a O' My N «yuF VY"Keauw _ry wN. »�.Y${Y7 CON C »pQY Y Lr. iOi. �CC1 CC 94 .�+5^L ^i ZO -..VY �iiL�Y »u�i Oa. dMnOU6s� Kb` O.ISn ) NKD w YY Yp �r ei @ PVC D yl' Y P C N wl- w �I: Irn " fie. a uy�- $w ws _R°,•� .r+rC o ega. N°� ry oG1�oh� Og >1Y i . r =Sm .y�teay N C - Y JJJ kL 4 4 ' � N+'. a ev o•n p y W N »U i ii r S: P��L i ~ A Y F L L ... V SC`N YZ's uj y7d b 2 ` zt Y ' du M.i 0 9 Yt LS�I p y X69 C »yO pN o y i ri r i �_cr 66 ywy it �. crG w. L �LLV +� 4 QG A Y r O b o 4 O Y M N y C rG je j� �S� � L4 .t � VvYDNf y4wY a Q ,t- 1-1 G Z W E :.^..w 3 K^ A 06N L M n Si A. t�8 V WC Y�1� sg� ��yL�OMY �yC. 'aow c ryzu� dg L+^• N Y qV Y i b9 QQ Hai b �{•� ee�� � �i r -Vf A C N'M 6 vC 0 G�51 L ; y �` °G N��eLpep•�.w.x i Y t�Y NCV��NNN NR-Wi7st +Y= p� O? � AJ �L IL.1MS w Sr � 3qq`s�wee N~ #C P'viYCSsywyuYyL�ou N °NI••N ��y� K uLy RiY ^N YN MiJ�M �g IS :.^..w 3 K^ A 06N L M n Si A. t�8 V 66®® cC ap■ u p 0+ u ^y yRyL V64 �Q�^ N3_ L 4 +�VG t�Y L.y LL ��nn4 ��•• aa yaa� a'� �. N. +p+C■Y T^ °mil° .Y. ,QRi �.OYH RM n NL NYM Mq v GM �•• ".� has N2- r64o ii; 7.8 g_- a= ws ���V.�U +u wad N. v ;N. IN c ~� � Nr `g � �a Ca ~C �}^ y' ^u ppyWy ^4M�N� p�C NCR y.NM -}y in ^� qYC C�°"'•CpyL¢�q �^ Y N is y S�u aT 1 CM qR Nt ~5rp ^p�sN jSC 3S vWyi y$NJ 8.rs+ yw Qy p�}*' +�I.w N(� tit pY v IL' t M r+� ®N 63 i yC It LNLy 3'040 Ciy.� R w J �■ Y,.GG iG Crr� N�cN 61 ywy.` VQ aL q�••V•N Q`a'Y+ph <N 3.Cd .M FYT �QU� yu ^p rdaZ >t �jniii' tNII +L e�Np NfY� '..S G7 J.L4�p Ai. -Ww.ti- cc yi N6 .V..OQC Y .. 106- NC Y RR. a W. °N uOW NG 2yyCG.pQ�� CpRQ °°.� N ..-C} 4N4 }�: ti°i pQ Cy. V V bra V 4 p Q 4 b O O VH `J 'aow c ryzu� dg L+^• Y N d� 1s +Y= p� IS yy Ly oY 2. ►_33 as yy C.. p_- 12 = ze �N i�+ �9SX. }p.Y '•16 Y+ =3 %w �o 4A Ww 3G N -RAd 4 + All N 66®® cC ap■ u p 0+ u ^y yRyL V64 �Q�^ N3_ L 4 +�VG t�Y L.y LL ��nn4 ��•• aa yaa� a'� �. N. +p+C■Y T^ °mil° .Y. ,QRi �.OYH RM n NL NYM Mq v GM �•• ".� has N2- r64o ii; 7.8 g_- a= ws ���V.�U +u wad N. v ;N. IN c ~� � Nr `g � �a Ca ~C �}^ y' ^u ppyWy ^4M�N� p�C NCR y.NM -}y in ^� qYC C�°"'•CpyL¢�q �^ Y N is y S�u aT 1 CM qR Nt ~5rp ^p�sN jSC 3S vWyi y$NJ 8.rs+ yw Qy p�}*' +�I.w N(� tit pY v IL' t M r+� ®N 63 i yC It LNLy 3'040 Ciy.� R w J �■ Y,.GG iG Crr� N�cN 61 ywy.` VQ aL q�••V•N Q`a'Y+ph <N 3.Cd .M FYT �QU� yu ^p rdaZ >t �jniii' tNII +L e�Np NfY� '..S G7 J.L4�p Ai. -Ww.ti- cc yi N6 .V..OQC Y .. 106- NC Y RR. a W. °N uOW NG 2yyCG.pQ�� CpRQ °°.� N ..-C} 4N4 }�: ti°i pQ Cy. V V bra V 4 p Q 4 b O O VH `J W"'may ,- T, �aY D Yv i v O C Y N N � A O+ N Y Nae .as � a fit c*N q p wN IL O ~� a a� u C �wwC ^ Y Nay CVW� Y _ M z t = NM Y ■ U Y V L M y apu y OIM Q C N v L L VT o'MV ■`Y °e D;R� a q c c ` k _ Q V q�+I.• ' V �Y�C d. GOB O CO .O Oy 01t�� 00 OOY�1l1Wlu� LwY r V CNLLO' C i yLp�yy9 aY Vr•DY M L «6wp NCD Wa N Y ••��Y t0 •'•' vC q^ �O 01�Lm�VC'YLy � R�c9L :� 'D L igyNDO sN M F..` 6 OV Y� � �YCVYCCw QNO Cy4NVG �L�,�V a qL�y C.r V a's jy .5 M 0 w�pNC v ICC•. Y. UO V�oiOw YO NM.�O , OvaV F, W Ot C NNR Y. E R Lyy L u �qf fO, _ e Y L•• �Y N O^ O '�1 ~ ,± Y�C �� d l I - C y T ^ v1 Y q • _M Y NC CpC« N N y V�G Y. Cq y 3 V� 4 11.N Y CGC �C ^bQ L C w V °Co .L YY 6N t q NNO N w O,, - . O ,CG� y x C. UUU S.��[ R y„p ROf.Y "Gp rpm 6yy 0 ,Y �•L1 OC l yC 2.0 N YN .2-. G L v C M Y L •rMj .6 r•� M y^ " N O t Y. y e w Q 1� Y O R Y9 X (! � V L p O Y d G N C � � i� N Y q YY pt f,• wU�VIV E 6� M.N W Nf�. pwp L Oyw Al L y 6 G �YV C /�i u{ O M G a dr. RLN O N3 p M Y Q`i U Y L �LWO N fY CLC �M� p cSL CYNN 019SwNd } N =tNtCqpGp C YLCC N{��T✓✓ gC�YN1 O V M vwYYYN 01 CYY Y�N p019MN^qq •p'uu ^p NaCL LYY. NAM N <N� pVU {P>C _O CpLp- V -a -301AN GO 4R� Vi 4 V IL O:N 6K �aY D Yv i v O C Y N N � A O+ N Y Nae .as � a fit c*N q p wN IL O ~� a a� u C �wwC ^ Y Nay CVW� Y _ M z t = NM Y ■ U Y V L M y apu y OIM Q C N v L L VT o'MV ■`Y °e D;R� a q c c ` k _ Q T c a d v N N Y V c R qq L y V �. C N� Y • C y{t u (Y� u 6^ 8 V V N V M 6YD _V 6 • p -p � I Y y c R 3 VyLF v w Z. N Kee 4 yC CCO V V-= T1 b 0` W.V�1 7 SCV «v V G� t O'N aDU�1i 6U t; $ N L X fL 21 Y R.'L L ay �Ya$ �a Nwa y � Y CC 1Y. RYw yNYL wo N�L ar a:L � n��e YLV �p C Dy � >nM r• N V C w „^ 98Yr c� mow}y i� c <LL �p •Oitw1 N � r V a jj J V q�+I.• ' V �Y�C d. :O tM w� R nNa1y9C .°+� L�L aY Vr•DY M L �1 �•v �� L6 i C "� pM w owt=11 Y � OLO V 'D L LwcT iv �. n. M^ ALyV♦ VW paw d�c p ■° NC'^ w� O iO ;3 N NY'N� if 1! wNNY tOR:y +R.dW ply' v N C.r V a's jy .5 M NQ OQ^ Y 9 y v c V aJ qL CCpR O N ^ NB.�;p ywy yC„ 1j CV N�6VL Za IL V a jj J ffl� tat D wr%Y; v$o -C 83 a, VVVGV Y' CC2Y_3 O� �� °.Y 3- i1 `A2 LL 4 V N 9 ~CC -' a {IL i v � yuN� HOCV A r yuy u ~pN ap,y,}a M� NMV --sit y Q N �NjM pGp 6p.CYr lOOi■nN N^ C�j 1$a �^t -C -07 ~ s O r M L Y�"L V pv V =7 w 9pY -CY to --x Oy . Y W Y L N ptyyC��. 4~ it FSY Y�Lg1�� Y Q$Q? R y aye �a •` N� Q �J L pe f YN cLT� yLG. MSG 6e3 RC. 9Lt�N17 _ eD r N b n csGGe Sas$'b5 °G c��� rw. 9A rN =� w 9x2 $V�ii4 gV7gE� _aG . $w -4! S.i C� • ��NYYyy. ,yuy� y 4 i 4 Vd� +V Y a L X y DID Coo a y a 4 N q L V Y M Y yyy V 4 a i ANIZV�Vw YNNYt �YCWVC � �� ..h rSVZ;W 4 t0 V �C$Q jbe.. C' Y I' Op. - arI R "rt�� .Yp °ape vi-I — Ai COO' �JY£iya Cyroa V {pA fFyw iDN �{.OYY ' N °vV 9pp GN . Y A j A �N?a.LKM E fil I�CL9 ifLLi I b-C N 0.ti 4 ViV y_Ngµ« yY Vn �9 Nw b 4 Q MUM L w 9L� Y V =O g ` µyy r a H i Y 1 C y E$ rrY ,YY•'vly� p V M Y !GS E. 'p' y� Iw SA IN ` �w M µ Y > M µµ I'm 41 a N N I i GmCo +NM V Ni'p2µM CEO V O 6 W 7 M FE ii ems. �V L t L N ya 9y uu7 C V Cv > 6E g'u{� O 04 G. V s Y a � 0 ar L A 6 M N R W aAM p Ea 1+ Ysat /xY X0¢3 o�■p� Y a l LCO D V N N n K ♦ r w ` nN'i ti N t7.. C pt V L V� V `A2 LL 4 V N 9 ~CC -' a {IL G G0.y yuN� yy+pC s• L = p p C O� T r y VY�� CLL y K L.Z^ •�w N.V �N� ~ s O r M L Y�"L YC �.G -CY to --x Oy . Y W Y L fya Vhf N 4� t ya ���� a 3 � � a •+ °tea Si f Wm NfY VVR C t1 y.q ar MY'tl1 Y 'yy� N i �` N i:�'Pyp L ..~w tat µo �NYVV isv � 4 y VN w �N� CsVwi C q�Y'IYC � N M iM VQC4 �VySO, csGGe Sas$'b5 °G c��� rw. 9A rN =� w 9x2 $V�ii4 gV7gE� _aG . $w -4! S.i C� • ��NYYyy. ,yuy� y 4 i 4 Vd� +V Y a L X y DID Coo a y a 4 N q L V Y M Y yyy V 4 a i ANIZV�Vw YNNYt �YCWVC � �� ..h rSVZ;W 4 t0 V �C$Q jbe.. C' Y I' Op. - arI R "rt�� .Yp °ape vi-I — Ai COO' �JY£iya Cyroa V {pA fFyw iDN �{.OYY ' N °vV 9pp GN . Y A j A �N?a.LKM E fil I�CL9 ifLLi I b-C N 0.ti 4 ViV y_Ngµ« yY Vn �9 Nw b 4 Q MUM L w 9L� Y V =O g ` µyy r a H i Y 1 C y E$ rrY ,YY•'vly� p V M Y !GS E. 'p' y� Iw SA IN ` �w M µ Y > M µµ I'm 41 a N N I i GmCo +NM V Ni'p2µM CEO V O 6 W 7 M FE ii ems. �V L t L N ya 9y uu7 C V Cv > 6E g'u{� O 04 G. V s Y a � 0 ar L A 6 M N R W aAM p Ea 1+ Ysat /xY X0¢3 o�■p� Y a l LCO D V N N n K ♦ r w ` nN'i ti N t7.. C pt V L V V 4 V N 9 ~CC C Y u 6 4 4 O t � C C t D L = p V Y ! r y I V Y 4Qt a4� O r M L Y�"L -CY to --x Oy . Y W Y L fya Vhf N 4� t ya phQµ Lw a5 I � Cr fl t r, oawXava app L�v4 .,ri w c Nonc v V N t` ' ■+■•pp�u ^avyy�aoa' L�S s � tto " c... u O Y CgwV ^ ° .2 >C 3: 6 �{ G 4.i a� �■ cz 0 el CYr L lJ L4L NL OM G4 4 a 4 �r... Y a 6w /r O 4L4 C{�jU y S ` C L e �CA YC ti yO tV+ yL � Hitt pU O tl Y> Y Ttl� r} WO S4i �0 ^ ■pp��yw..0 a VD 'w j, a �tlNC V .� ^�pW�ay■Y p� V i/ i Y Y V V ^ N y � cN c{ aO'Lw,2 if'/ Y- C4gN� G O -y3pN V i w v^ 9tl v aqo u\ _r.~. 9 Y' ,y V N pw C N N M f J G w P V iC 9y C� N NS�rag_CL�YC�Y CUS a^ max ! O {l y Q Gq 4 V 7 ^~?� V O> L 6 W Y i M N y{� S{,,SSS{�� yy.4 �Ly P } Y 9 tl > C~C COTW �L~ VO•�+`/i+. pL O:N 65L iq b Y N 41 C U L tT 01 V 01 tl !S ACS M .0 VO L C ry OS L V yytlY� O T �„ O y qa O7 ^ '�QC a LN Q� ... OQ a4 Y e MwYyYS LVYY -,e C V'.A 6Y V p O ■. - «TGN L Ic An u 4L.� T 4. cL..- or.- 'zvucE LE Z a qwv_ a+ mC O c Y{�jRO ^ �- z01 tl •q itl'� Y9 ws w ^CV 01 QwC Nak s. ,. w CC 4N Y o Oy P C ■ 4 Y 0$ C N w g= C 4 N T o N N 4 N y .li i W w 4 0 0 7 y s° aV LLC 4'`wNd w.. CXM L i T L.L. Q $ V M w tl i �v NUJ o°. Lawn r� M,,N,�.� ao a -a° Q yG V• ■■1 MM ~.CNC .O N®® ~p�G= tii yu� :a giily� VVi N�4S.1% a« ny.0 V' MTf A'O CL V�k aM a M �t�f{�.��Y N::��� YC O6vyV ■.C. ^V°. wx G410 bL La° O�pLf4. YG4 .� _U CYOL wN•i/ ■LNCL 4 U•• 6 01 wL M g0 6M A wy M. Qiutl o.a.. �aa $ «d��g� °N$o `. vLi O ^ ^^ 4 01Y ,09 li 11 w0 Gp C N O Z b— Nry�.,4 N —Z. }° �4t F� NK w N NC V= « L ? M OV O ^ O p O ND UCttV> ^w w 301�L tV 6'w� e V L�. O ZCOI }O «U6ii pOIO�L O�Q' y. Yg G 40 CO Si M y' OI � N O L00 w�L C V NO a�N �« C� °at 'w i« >AC.�' Yy O. TYYT 0.0 «vCa cu�i C' W P y L� 1qw� N pO. L C Y N L N q T V g- N CAS N6V V� 'wGwN NV y�yL6V ��Y tl wGINf g'w wG4•.ti i ^L X 0 4 # q 0 L C L.. S {� pp W htV Li Vti �A C7 �.¢T t11 gQ.aG 4Ci 4W,u A A A d Y f _ ` Na °s mY «t �''SN'i. �'� c��t" � L rj •� LL y y� Y C L L tl V y L O) M ii. O�� • n� N ^A 0. Y YC V Oil �i, N 3 C I q�yaa wcs`y 9° YCL�aCC+ � 1Ie.•.y. yy�v °qy$. 8 •o�. s u�` $ £s u g} A e�°+ • 95�� .y- N Y +� o y� � Y. s qU «tl u oN'.� LQg .5.3 AL Q�Yyj nth. 6w �C(�N � iY La4��O n CYIY Ly _�L �. nC p.L C� L.wyyL S OP.GY Y�I 64� � CG YO _ ^_N C tC Ly^" y^ i0 .� ■ N� NZ-- InC 4 fLp u� V� «Y�•. yN Nom. yW qq Ctly LlY A� y ny YV L gar L v3 o•rf at. u'•. snv awXrJ Ott ac. WM w�tY.N ? L70 -c ` rt \n1.� 1 Y Q M L « _ O N C Y C Y y y v + C W A« Y V 31 �� N Y p G L •Q+ ^ OI OYJ yVy V $O m UoY «Eo`d eEy ^ � M N Q..•• IY Z' a YYdnR ilk L pCpCC 4��p C� C^ pLY OC � N C alM �LYCC W K -u'Jy` ■ ■gyp YYC ^� "y•'N� nNyy�yyj Wm ° c � > p4 CO Y8O Yip O^X ��t1q J 2 A « Y ~ � a•a V Sl Nye ur' Gv �p O$ 9 r6 i. '�� Y {Yi1 q� I °I•� W C �Y9 n ,•. pg� I I SZ; tl My T Piz 6�. ..YqqO= cLd OI O C � YOT^ G°'1O m UoY «Eo`d eEy fn pCpCC 4��p C� C^ pLY OC � T%y � C alM �LYCC ^� "y•'N� nNyy�yyj 4N � > p4 CO Y8O Yip O^X ��t1q Nn n� Ci�L oYn� `���•° paw�co aYL �1 yew ri°��,s QV c ^ w diz; N04- r = � ° � Y ! ♦ lil �' 2 N tl +� k r3 �Y ca orw T! Ll N L Y L Y �O.s Qi' V n0 V� =li q q u .•+11 u Q Yu u JCL 6 OpG n� VA C Y Y YM T A N C d ..IVA SCW 1�N.p L e L n �A � �YW - C y � N y O L N L PYY C C f R w Y Y■ M Y LL. SlL�MO Y�y L GEC Y N � C C u 3 C a La gV{GE q °� V LMy F Y Y Bar w u{yyyLlY $ w q NN 4 u_C �.S yGLLY a N �. �$ .°N 4 Y 4 Y J 2- ` L p & V O t � t ^° r- y „ u 4 y N O '� O 4 per■ WG Y y �n0@ O) ��qL a L ,�� � � pRp,,CL L F V W s A ^ N 9 J ■ wY Y w E L K i c y Y 9 y N V g 4y N w 1 4 r3 �Y orw T! Ll N L Y L Y �O.s pC =li q q u .•+11 u Q Yu u JCL 6 OpG n� VA C Y Y YM T A N C d ..IVA SCW 1�N.p —+x y ;sue:, fi x• -uas CITY OF RANCHO CUCA3t ONGA ,u Gl7�M a c DATE: December 9, 1987 u � � TO: ;t airman and Members of the PI ikng Commission FR?4: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associat e Planner SUBJECT: ERVIROWIENTAL AS tiT AN0 TENTA'i1YE TRACT 13359 - nom, eu o sou : on o cres ,U., eis to the Very Law Residential -il strict (,!es- than 2 Willing units per acr - -e), located on the east side of Sapphirre Street, south of Hillside Road - APR: 1061 - 691 -9, 10 and 11. (Continued -1-ow November 10, 1987) Related File., Variance 8,7 -1& ENVIRONMENTAL 82g2 0T AND VARIANCE 87-15 - WALTON - A request to reduce the w n ima average 'or. size frow , square feet in area to 21,392 square feet in area in copJunction with a six (6) lot subdivision located on tie ea?-6? side of Sapphire Street, south of Hil�'jside road - APNi' 1061- 691 -10 and 11. (Continued frpw,} November 10, 1987) Related File: Tentative Tract 13359 Staff is in receiHt,.of a utter from the applicant requesting that these items bs continued to the next P anninc Commission meeting in order to more thorlughly analyze the drainage issue. Therefore, staff recommends a continuance to the January 13, 1988 Plannin5 fiommission me'e`ting. Re tfull ubmi ed, Brad' B le; city fanner 88: SM: vc ;7 Attachment: Letter from Applicant f TP5 C, ; =s. •.... ',: :. .: &. -.. ...E ,r.� _ .. 'a . _. e _: -ar c •��. �"�.dicw ;�I z iAkSe, -/ W p =l9 16�CX T"4 i'dt/'i!✓ 7-40 21e 75 7„ ?— r611.1,E' ,tl,,�f,�� m 0 a CITY OV RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT o DATE: December 9, 1987 u I9 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission PROM: Brad Buller, City „Planner ,, BY: Nancy Fong, Asxiate PI er SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CQIiE}ITIONAL USE PERMIT 87-16 -” - e development or at $' 2 acr •a' -"e3 s ar" � piling ` center consisting of 4 retail buildings totaling 87,681 square feet in the Community Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hellman Avenue - APN i08- 261 -58. I. ABSMCT: At the rfgular meeting of November 10, 1987, represen7atives of su( rounding -residents reCosted that this project be continued aria to a time conflict for those concerned residents who coo'., ,not attend the wnetir;g. With the developer's consent to this raquest, the Planning Commission continued the project to this regular meeting. The developer a d the residents also agreed to meet one more orate on December 4, 1T'V). The purpose was for the developer to explain and present the reasork=,�why they have chosen this site plan design. Thaw outcomf:__'bf this neighborhood meeting will be presented to the Phoning Commission at this public hearing. II. PROJE%,T"AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requestsd; Approval of a neighborhood shopping center,- detailed sit pan, elevations, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and ;Dnip North�e_T 5Ure__R6i_Re r , Single Family Homes, Vacant; Mixed -Use District South - Single Family Homes; Low Residential' District (2 -4 dwelling unity per acre) East - Der Weirierschnitzel, Woolworth /Perry's Market Center, Mini - Warehouse; Community Commercial District West - Apartments, Single Family Home; Medium -Nigh Residential District (14-24 dwelling units per acre), Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) I TEN -9, U M` 1 PLANNING COMPiISSION STAFF REPORT COND'V IONAL USE PERMIT 67 -16 - NUWEST December 9, 1987 Page 2 C. General Plan Designations: 'Prroojec e - GommUnity Commercial North ' Mixed Use South ' -,' Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling ,units per acre) East - Community Commercial West - M -%4iu* -high Density Residential (14-21 dwelling units per acre), Low Density,Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acres D. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Pa►'?.ing Spaces Spaces of Uce Footage Ratio Required Provided' Retaii 75,696 1/250 303 304 Fast Food Restaurant 5,145 1/75 6t, 69 " (no drive -thru) Restaurant 5,9.60 1 /100 60 60 Total 432 433�� E. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant with no significant vegetation- it slo*r gently from north to south at appy�ximatefy 3 percent. A s,=�� d or dike transverses the site at tae south side of the property which protects the southerly single family homes from flooding. A Taco Bell restaurant exists at the corner of Helms Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. F. Applicable Reoulations: The development of a shopping center is POUR o a on tonal Use Permit according to the current Development Code. III. A ALYS_S:, A. General-, The proposed project would be the first to be eve oped under the Fc ,)thill Boulevard Specific Plan development standards and guidelines. The proposed site plan clusters four retail buildings in -a V shape confieuration. The developer has integrated the exisving Taco Bell restaurant in his desigl of th- site plan. Pedestrian connections have been provided the site that link buildings and parking areils with sidewalks for promoting convenient and safe pt.estrian movement. A major focal point has been provided in front of Building Retail "C" that includes a tail tower and a large plaza area. Additional plaza areas ha'e been provided between Pad "A" and Shop "i ". Major access fs provided from Foothill Boulevard, Helms Avenue and Hellman Avenue. Access for r�ervice and truck traffic is mainly Prom the secondary drat'._yrays off Helms Avenue and Hellman Avenue. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIOGA1_ USE P2RM1T 87 -16 - NUWEST December 9, 1987 Page 3 The proposed elevations project a contemporary spanish theme. It`' includes architectural elements and detai?; encouraged s - - -_the Foothill Specific< Olan, such as cover4: arcades, curvilinear gables, towers with subtle variations in detailing and design, trellises, plaster cornice, impost molding and acce� ceramic tile. Detailing and other architectural elea ,,es have been added to the rear elevation of the main building to, provide visi4al relief to the building mass; The same detailing and elements have been added to the rear elevation of those buildings that, have Hellman Avenue and Helms Avenue street frontages. G B. Desi n Review Committee: The Committee (Blakesiey, Chitiea, rou as reviewerPed the project on September 17, 1487 and found it to be acceptable, but recommended that all design items and tec..��al issues must be resolved by they applicant through working with staff prior to being reviewed by the Planning Commission. The deNeloper has been working diligently with staff in resolving all the technical issuer and addressing those desig,, items recommende(l by 01e-.Committee as follows: 1. The pedestrian connection betwien shop "3" and Retail "C" stiould be further improved to ensure it is safe and convenient for encouraging pedestrian usage. This could be achieved by incr?asing the \'Width or the pedestrian connection to 18 4,'eet and flaring out at the northern''end adjacent to the main plaza area. Two free - standing trellises should be provided with ad4itiunai pedectriain amenitie€ sr° ;: as benches, _ free - standing "p --.;ed plants__ F and adequate lighting for si4ty purposes. - (Revised is shm in Exhibit OHM 2. A similar pedestrian connection with` design as mentioned above should be provides between Retail "A" and Shop "2 ". 111,evised as shoKn in Exhibit 'H2' ). 3. ,All pedestrian pathways across circulation aisles shouid be of textured treatment such as 4nterlocking brick pavers, exposed agg erne or a combination of both. iiianditi4x�edi. 4. The existing stamped concrete texture pavement in the existing driveway of Helms Avenue should be replaced with textured material consistent with the shopping center, (Goh.,itioned). j 3 ���' PLANHlit6 CWTH, 'REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PEiM)T 0-16 - HUIEST ,_clecee.er 9, 1987 Page 4 5. Pedestrian amenities should be provided in ,front of Pad "B ", (ConWtionedT). 6. Random .;tacking of roof tile should be p:rovi'ded. (Conditioned). 7. The applicant should work with staff it resolving the design and technical issues fir the stretch of Foothill l"-�ulevard betwisen Heilman Avenue and the first'-ariveway to comply with all applicable City codes. (Rev;eed as shown In Exhibit 410. The developilr adde ssed th* design issue by providing i meandering sidewalk behind rah S to 10 foot wf landscape turf area. At sods tieie as the ca-th basin will not be needed, the 3 foot ride concrete " is !nl*t Gould be reverted to and integrated as rartJaf_ +has landscape planter area. Both { Citty Planner and the City Engineer have reviewed this design and fownd it to be acceptable). $. The applicant should work with surrounding residents and staff in developing acceptable solutions along the buffer zone at the south,_., property boundary to mitigate tlte'concerns of noise, view, privacy and securi'{ (Tttis issue will be further disLussed in Sectio4s C and D of the report). 9. A significantly ,greater amount of trees as well as increased number, of box -sized trees shouti be plk:.ted along Foothill ,Boulevard because there is a 7 too 8 foot grade -difference from the top of the Curb to;the parking area and a 2:1 slope with a 3 foot ''high flood wall. Therefore, 15 gallon size th-eis, ground cover and shrubs may t-ot be seen i f' planted within the slope area. ( Conditioned). 1Q, This stretch of Foothill Boulevard should be designed as a r-uburban parkway where the landscape treatane f,r should be dominated by informal -iurtering of London Plane trees, California Sycamore and Crepe Myrtle. All the parkway charac'eristics include rolling turf berms, meander?ng and undulating sidewalks and hardscape to compliment this infr peal Ian jcape treatment (Conditioned). f El to l i De "Wo We '9' 1 Page '5 t � 0 z =11. inOse the nucber of trees and b = esiaed i 1, shOO,4 a" o be planted along. Sul TO An kmmm to up the 1"� within tblic righ%- ;. cans fstnt 1x foot W140- stdeWk and a i f tod w4. LAAdM;;e� ioXOKA ZhU ld be dg" to e 3 foot TWO flat +wall. WIU4,;n pl;m' ar* 7. special landscape treatment swh as accent trees, specimen site trer., and an i0crm vnbw of trees sk4 =Cxi be provided. sm tpoal 0. / 13. Dem ii.ndszapinq should bt - Oroe'ided along the entire seath ropefty boundary with trees, and a dout.le row of shrubs. N gallon size and planted at 31 feet od c°erater and with the appropriate cover. (Goeditoeed). 14 r 111 wa s such as flood walls, retainiw .4 walls: scraZn ll.), . should be 'n decorative design ansi 4t wi 0+ 1 the FI/ 1 ite-tuml style. C. Neighborhood Meatin, 1. A neighborhood ueetigq was held 6 July 8, 1987 to introduce this, rop se'. ;; project to the surrounding resi nts and'�Aro obtain feedback from they early in th review process. Nineteen residents we�`?pees': at the meeting. The follMaq is a su=ary of thei-• concerns: a. Socurity and Safety Hazard - The residents feel that the 3`-foot high wall 'tith the landscaping at the south ,iroperty boundary crvl d ,xeata: security and safety hazard, in that, 4t may not atop people fro* $ueping over the wall into their side or back ;yard, b. Noise - Increased 10ise from camoercial vehicles, autos and from the collection of trash, f'4pE!cielly When the trash ` ectclrure areas are tbpttirrg at the ;:oath w.roper4, boundary area. c. Trash - the trasi encloslgre area b�itsi in the back could contribute to, 1 'Uh s illed -over and coned e � �ia sucks 471:ncreasing amt of rodents and other unwanted av� ravel n. %. 7e,- .. PLANNING COMMM, STAFF REPOU l' CONDITI NAL vst P E€ T V -16 - NUWESr - December 9, 1987 Page 6 d. Trafftc - At present, vehicles_ and J trucks are - a;.sinR l elms Avenue- =and Devor. Strdlit,_, as tht;F'odghfares to bypass all the traffic signal`s, on Foothfil - Bo4levarG The propbs.-A project would increase the amount of traffic along 'Helms Avenue. e. Visual' The proposed project couti block their view to the mount4ins. = - f. privacy ,;u The amount of parking spaces' In- the back and szrvice drive invade their privet, in that_ it could ancour ge loitering, Increa 3e in crime, etc. -f 2. On Septmber 16, 1987, a. `second neighbortood y greeting was held. with -6 residents in attendance. The rtrr�pose of thin a:�etirig was for the oeveloper to inform the raildent- of tiie typo of mitigation measures they are proposing to address their concerns. The 'followiny are the proposed mitigatian measurer, from the developer: a. Security and Safety - The developer is proposi„_f to rise the 3 foot hip, block gall to r =feet high. Two wrought iron gates that are lockable wili`be included - to alle-1 for workers to matAta ; the 10 foot landscape area. The d �vel oper .11 So is proposing to hire" , private sel. kity firm to patron t..e' site,, especial3y during the night. b. Noise -'Elie developer staffed that the rear parking lot is for '.employee parking only and that s!?rvire' and commercial vehicles do not involte semi - trucks. Therefore, the moise level generated wpald have negligible impact. v. Trash - to regards to trash collection, the- developer_ tated that the shopping center doe,4_ .' not ly cl ude supermarket where,�he type of garbage will not be as messy. ' (Staff dotes that new.�Citx' regulations require self- closing trash � .. d'f'...�posters) .T • t PLAtiNII� i`Ohiti35��i�'' S'f �_REPDRT � - CONDITIONAL � f iiitil� 7o-16 - `NI1WEST December 9,1987 ;. Paje d. Traffic- To discourage additionfl traffic fraa going sot�:b,,, of project along 421as Avenue= ;he, t, lk soutos- ' driveway will be close,' - rehicles`froc usir~g the s� the rear as a thoroughfare;.-Pcl-- , will be installed. Parking spaces wl, r be deeignated for employee parking MY and signs could be pasted for "no overnight parkr_2," e. Privacy - The 'proposed six foot hi`g'h block _wall would prevent casual sight invrAt� on of the hoaeowr:ir's V,ri,racy. F&4 ther, bougainvillea or similar type of vines will be planted along the entire stretrh of the black wail 'o discourage anyooe from cllmrbin�# over it. With the parking spares designated far, employee parking onl,,, with Yigns posted for "no overpighf ` panting" and with adequate lf' ';g, it would discourage people,4 ?hangino out" in the parking lot., The residents at tKi meeting revielmd the proposed mitigation measures from the developer and ,stated that they did not adequately address their uneeres. Th!, main issue is the service driveway and the paarkiag sp % ;ces, Mich could create the problem of invasion of privacy, s�uriq, noise, :trick, etc. The residents feel that ,,he developer should look into other al I --Aves in site plan design where the back se`.c rvice driveway could be elimiratid ,(see example in tMir petition). The residents also statad that the pad elevations for the building .ftulki be lowered so as not to obstruct their view of the mountains. On Dc ober� 26, I9G7, staff. -or;d_t:ted an informal rset,� g between the resid its that abut the site 4wes(Rately to the south and the developer. The purpose of '�;his meeting was to show th- final .,esign and treatmer't of , ttie buffer zone at the �tth property boundary. Staff, also irtited a `flier of the Sheriff's Department to C.ttend �. meeting who could answer questions -"-.,.larding ,the issue of crime and safety. The �sidents r;viewed the buffer zone treatment but d not have any consensus as to its ode*icy in e*.eeting they concerns. �1 2. Traffic - Tie d velopment of his project w;il- ' acre a vehicular tr >ffic. 'The resider,tf also sited concerns- that this project would idd to the traffic :. °, Helms Avenue. At pr.sent, vehiries and trucks are using Helaws Avenue and Devon Street as a thoroughfare to avoid signals at Foothill and Archibald and Foothill and Hellman. Mitigation Measure - Foothill Boulevard, being e ma�ior arterlaT-affiel having a raised median island . with re opening, would be able to move the traffic a4; an acceptable revel. in regards to increased' traffic on Helms, the City 'traffic Engineer_ stated a trd6,Jc signal will be ultimat4ly installed at Ne in-tersection of Foothill Boulevard and Helms Avenue. , °Further, the City could put up "no truck trafric" signs along Nelms tMinue to prevent trunks from rasing this route- as a short cut. The street is 'already posted for a speed limit, of 25 miles per hour. r% PLANNIK, COMMISSION, STAFF Rl PORf r` CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -16 =`NUWEST December 9 1987 Page 8 < J� D. Envi nmental Assessment: Staff has eSmpletW4i, the -Vi nE ronmen tal cli ISE 10d has determined ttrit' the - ` development -)f the project, may have !ate following potential adverse impa5tsz _ ` 1. Drams -" The develop�eht of `'this project may expose people -or properties, to water related hazards such 4s flooding. Heilman Avenue is.,. historical ly,r.wati;-carrvinq ,street. The.;site" is�,wythin a food zone. The pr oject itself' will �. not create a,y significant additional runoff onto Hellman - venue. Mitt ation iaeasure - A - drainage /hydrology study � Hass Deen provIded that determined mitigation measures to handle the surface water including ' the 100 year flood. A 190 foo° cats;: basin will be inst..; red_ on Foothill Boulevard_ including a 72 inch. -pips -'that connects With along N,eilman Avenue, consistent With the City's` Master Drainage Plan as shown in Exhibit "El ". The installatior!? of such drainaq� facilities would .4leviate /,,the past problem of excess surface ��watr fl��ading the single family resig,Citoes to the soufi( In addition, tai,City ha;%`schedulad two improvement Ve capital projeciis to completed within thO next -,= years that would reduce the flooding along He9yma.: Avenue, as sho m in Ex ibit "E7." 2. Traffic - Tie d velopment of his project w;il- ' acre a vehicular tr >ffic. 'The resider,tf also sited concerns- that this project would idd to the traffic :. °, Helms Avenue. At pr.sent, vehiries and trucks are using Helaws Avenue and Devon Street as a thoroughfare to avoid signals at Foothill and Archibald and Foothill and Hellman. Mitigation Measure - Foothill Boulevard, being e ma�ior arterlaT-affiel having a raised median island . with re opening, would be able to move the traffic a4; an acceptable revel. in regards to increased' traffic on Helms, the City 'traffic Engineer_ stated a trd6,Jc signal will be ultimat4ly installed at Ne in-tersection of Foothill Boulevard and Helms Avenue. , °Further, the City could put up "no truck trafric" signs along Nelms tMinue to prevent trunks from rasing this route- as a short cut. The street is 'already posted for a speed limit, of 25 miles per hour. r% PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF ROORT " �t CONDITIONAL USE FER 1T 87 -1t - NUW2ST ,December 9, 1987 l Page 9 - 3. Noise - 'the development of this pr -pct may rncrease noise levet.ik for ,;the sing ".amity residents to the sdw.,_Jin that,., the rear set ,vice driveway and parking spaces, *auld generate, trtAck and service /delivery traffic. Mitigation Measure - A 'time limitation of 7 a,m toff p.m. s nu ""5e required for all service Ofi delivery activity along the service driveway. All trash enclosure areas have b",n oriented any„ fry the south )roperty boundary. T e parking spaces :should- ,'s"de.signated for employee parking only. Signs should be posted that indicate "no overnigat parking allowed." The blt-k wall along the south property boundary should be designed to, attenuate noise. According to the City's Municipal Zode,- ~efuse collection for shopping centers( that are adjacent to residential districts would net occur befort, & a.m.. 4. Ligh t or Glarw - The requirements to light the u ngdi" , service driveway and the parking area, in the back could increase the light and glare to the residerrees at the south property loundarx, ±ti atits Measure - All light poles sha?1 not exce a max "'eight of 15 feet measured from the finished grade. Kali mounted light fixtures should - not .xeeed 15 feet from the finished grade o,, the parking, lot irr the rear. All lig4,t " fixtures should have shields to prev,,nt light from spilling ever and should be of high pressere-sodium type (orange color). S. Crime/Security - The residents stated that the 3-eve 6Wfit of this project would attract additional crime at this rear parking area and service drive. Mitigation Measure - The developer is proposing to hi"rr. as pr va c` secur,ty firm to patrol the site, together with tho installation of block wails, landscaping, lights, signs posted. for 0 overnight {larking, parting spaces designated for employee parking only, and time limitations on service /delivery 'activity, it may decrease the chances of crime:. Based on the above mitir ion measures, some of which have been iror~poratedjllnte; . project atrd,iire remainder beings 17 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -i.6 - NUWEST De(,rember 9, 1987 Pajl a 10 added to as conditions of approval, staff has determined that there will not be significant impacts as a result of this project. 'f the Planning Commission concurs with these findings, issuance of la Negative Declaration would be appropriate. (i IV, FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project '1E co�is'stent with the General Plan and tWe o, Ml Boulevard 5pecfi�ie Plan in that: The design of the project creates community de,Ign. image that expresses and enhanc ?s the unique chaKzier and entity -of Rancho Cucamonga; the proposed project facilitates effftient and safe vehicular and pedestrian traffic; and the protect maintained the nighest possi`Ae quality of the environment by balancing the impacts of dove ,pment to the surr:,unding areas. In addition, the proposed use, building design, site plan, together with the recommended conditions of approval are in compliance with the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and all other applicable provisions of the City's statdards. The project, with the added mitigation measures, w;11 not cause significant adverse environmental impacts. V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item is a continued public hearing. Pu-1-3ic earing notice were sent 'to all properties within 600 of the project site. In addition, four neighborhood meetings were held by the- aeveioper. VI. RECO>AIENDATION: Staff recommends 5�hat the Planning Commission conduct a publTc hearing to consider,411 input. If the Commission concurs with staff's finding, t1hen issuance of a Negative Declaration and approval of Conditional Use Permit 87 -16 Would be in order. Respectful Y' 6 ed, f Bra"O IN-111 f Cityrdlan er BB:NF:tF Attachments: Letter from Res�i, *-� -its Exhibit "A" - Lt,, _,�Jon Map Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "C" - Detaiiad Site Fiun Exhibit "D" - Buffer Zone 'Toss Sections Exhibit "E" - Conceptual Grading Plan -D) Exhibit "F" - cncew;al Landscape Plan Exhibit "G" Plaza Design Exhibit "H" - Pedestrian Connection Design Exhibit "I" - Corner & Foothill Boulevard Streetscape Design �r Exhibit ""`- Lighting plan 1� Ext1bit "K" Elevatiols Exhibit %" - Shorefront N -sign Resolution of Approval with Standard Conditions 9V - OFyEtlli�(J r y� � °1(iY�YiiG�K?�Git� -e November 3, 1987 "1 q J Planning Commission . ATT: Chairmai We the people petition thAr, ;7-he meeting set forth ' for Noveittlaer 10, 1987 at 4:00 '.mI to discuss the oxoposed j plan for Hellman ,Avenue at Fc4thill Boulevar4. :='a cozy- tinu,:d dvae to--::he fact that the people are atot able to -'.',be present to voice their opinions about the proposed plan. `. L meeting sciieduled'for the evening hours would be more Appropriate for everyone, t' ' Sin- erely, { Aldo pocci. y Czzo , L^ f, Larry W--'V iams u ,w 1. 1, -- t August 3,1987 Dear Commissioners, W1,orable Mayo!?, E Council Members: AM e!�' .; '�'l�l9th?,�Iiti�12121r�141�1ii , . On July 6, 1997 a p.+fllxc meeting was held' by the City of Ranct,4 Cucamonga Planning t)ivision and a developer to ,-TIscuss the proposed shopping cen ar to be located at the Southeast corner of Hellman Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. We the undersigned, after careful oxamt net ton of the proposed plan, found that many important issues wt -e not properly addressed. These Issues - security, noise, gak4§e, -traffic control, p- tvacy, and land value are among the major concar:4 what will have a.direct,f'mpact on our community. Security - The proposed plan (Sightlina 'Print) outlines that a buffer j -- - - - - -- zone of approximately 1529 feet wide at a hIghr-:.4ievatToii j than the ei siring property barrier wall bn lrplementa�41. This b+iffer zone in Itself compi iments crimina; activ l,ty. The screening, wal approx;,-.�stely 6 feat height does nrlt ?rovide a good deterrent, In that a parking lot sit eajacant. The parking i'ot pr- illdes a nesting placo tor:al" kinds of unwarranted activitles. The proposed.:llghting also creates a prison effect by Illuminating The h'uses It would face, Noise - Traffic, tenth vuf:s and commerciai`vehicles, will create an - - - -- unbearable noise level that doesn't even exist at this Time. The proposed buildings and elevation w!ll treatei,an gchoing effect that again adds to the destruction of a �u..et residential neighborhood. Garbage - The buffer zone, as well as the parking lot, will be a haven ----- -- fcr refuse. People, autos, and commercial vehicles wIi! ccatribute to the polluting of our rralghborhood. Refuse toilection is another matter with bin? being located in the rear of the hulldings and colle- tors constantly spilling will provide a residence for rodonts and ottiar unwanted animals. Traffic Control Today with Taco Bell, Wienerschnitzel, Woolworths, ---- --- --- - - - -- and Perryrs Market, autos and commercial vehicles are using Helms Avenue and Devon Street as thoroughfares to bypass traffic signals at Foothill Boulevard and Archibald! Avenue. The proposed plan will create a1ditional traffic to the already overloaded to al streets. f=urthermore, a new thoroughfare fparklug I�)t) will be created between Hsiiman Aver,!ie and Helms Avenuo, contributing to the overall congestion.. Privacy - Priva, -y is invaded ty the elevation (Sightline Print) of the -- proposer! plan. Again, the homeowner, who is immediately adjacent to the parking !ot, is'aubjected to visual % lnspection by she patrons. Rotali Spoe A provision should be rmplementsd that 'nu 24 hours ------------ stores be allowed. We propose that additional studies be done on each of'Othe abova "ssues. Enclosed Is a sampling of wha!r can be done to appease''All concerned., We -;laceroly hope that these issues !y revlix"d, an < „hefare tk 70- pc K �`�'la��,.�«� -�:�• ... _ _ _ -.gasp �- �,.����c c�-- -. 3t 44614,5 4,67 Ali G -11 76 PM a . uas ors F -l3 a�'`tlfit�atJ�w �c,.�,,.r �t..t �A . e�.- �.t"�'�a�.�G- �'r,.�„�' -•E.• �c p,:� r r2- OV ,n9, -Az�l CJ- PV volv ,, _ S u 7 0i�a Q+.ti �. S' r _ $22d cc�y�e _ AUG 1 1198 _\ t # 'MAV 0 lie mmm ;. �a �a \ � �1\ � e C3 \ ��\ : �7g 2> � © ^n Q E \e :\,o■ I v E < d ■ � � � all & 2 c k G 7 �. \ f � ����■ � i ■ & i . \ � �1\ � e C3 \ ��\ : �7g 2> � © ^n Q E \e :\,o■ I v E < d ■ � � � all & 2 c k G 7 �. \ f � ����■ � . _ . E E 3 � k � . 4 � a � . ^� i ■ & � ■ � � k ° g 2 ■ © ■ � a § ■ $ § a I 2 ■ ■ ■ a ■ B .9 ■ a 2 § d x 0 7 $ S S $ - 2 Eft Of f 2 $ £ . _ . E E 3 � k � . 4 � a � . ^� s, NURTH CITY CF 1R.�'�CHp �K 1� Trri.E =�'" PLANNIlVG E XH iT-- -o . SC'AU: •�'� tP s, NURTH CITY CF 1R.�'�CHp �K 1� Trri.E =�'" PLANNIlVG E XH iT-- -o . SC'AU: •�'� 7{ filv Fl, l .—w.. �ww�+... -.s � •wY. iv�r5lRr } � � anr..v.u.w -a _ � Q, . 1 ♦ _ •„ ' ..n 1 �' 1 � 1 .f.l. r Fri _ e � � �`t 53' •� �" S 4y y` ., u = -.41 • r ��._:.� it p� Jj 1_ � ...���:������ � ��. �� , '__v.. ,[ ..._. ~__.M:.. -_. h- s'.'.r.. __._.._._ ...r �i1MiM- ffiMTf�S .... �'•_.. � ��\\. _.,.. z rl i r 3 y i i i v t _ 4 = 3 070T -02 012-9-87 PC Agenda 2 TTf i 'WOOMW jL- I- 25 ............ 11C Lis y ........ ZI V ,. SEREEN WALL ON I; RET WALL I 015i►NG WALL B AND '(UTTER n U lI !,b SCALE- 1'.' SD' 10 S. 70' NOUS E CUR B AND GUTTER � f EV: T. Wk.L• �^ SECTION " 3.3" SCALE o 1" • 10' CITE' CF le INNM DFVNM F.XHUT. scAJ-E: b y�i t FF = 92. ° { NOM 9R S EX IST. 6 J, HOUSIV. T� s i Fa ` F°: RB AND GUTTER i SEC I Iid,Y SS a to IZ 5CFkLE. 8. t sR F =93.SG Jv' HOUSE 6.o ",a n � CtiRB L r,�ITTER EXIST. 5NE1) SECTION "E-E" i 935 C ,� �CURfl GUTTER PLANTER CURB 5 EC ION "F-F" SC R LE t" CITY OF rIEI: if RANT C M CCCAND A rrrR.:E: w _ 7 � PLANNM DWISM EXHIBIT: SCALE. ,� 30' 3.33 •/ qti H' SECTION SCALE: V F. F..�, o 6" � E CT d0N "H-14" _°°_` SCALE : i° : 10' RE7. VA F. F. --- ar SECTION "I-I S C A !E E" : 10' - yC�RrN CITY CF rrEm. --if in� RAT z P[.A'+TiVQ+tG DIV1V "A t4 f' 1 -- `vu 4c • 2 =/� `10 �� ttit icy, p— Ill. MIN. Z c e. 3.0' FLM WALL_ � n4 EECT16N " L - L SCALE = 1" » 10". 1 21, R.C.P. w F.F.= CIS .w' 2 / cF' , j 9S• tt95.D E C'i 10% SCALE l NMTH i CITY It K AMihii;, DN19O EXHM T: __ SSCAU. �. it J '3' X4' ZOX Ex I?., x t SECTION "F+ P" SCALE ts' i SECTION "(1-a" 0. SCALE - Ia' SECTION "R-R" SCALE " • � ,,- f. F, = Its. 50 ,, f. F.: 93. O :93.00 CITY CF rrM RA.�1'iCHO CUCAMONGA TI'I'i. Lxzf , i, 44/f w G , Z 7 f i -,alo .,wri� nt; �+ wrt4t its'aoii y w r`alom W.1: • " �' RS � � g SI � E � 1i J• � r �e n 4 A 8 Ilk _ 1 V •1 Iii t i i i ' � - , •� iq `�ji�! +l •� Izz � %; :LE ��.��� X17' � Cam. •�' r 1 r. r E—Al :� �I'ul �' .. � f :,%'-s Olt i�, 1 � • �_�ja {, IL { 'I r. i�, 1 � • �_�ja {, IL { 'I i,.,, ni •.amw,9asoor s•... .r r. f �i IL I 1 am -. � _ .tea :C+►. �� � �M �+ ra 2 'Ji1 ''•' e� f i -j, -lei .•' i -. � _ .tea :C+►. �� � �M �+ ra 2 'Ji1 ''•' e� f i l i M :o � 1 7 *. .. �� � ; .�aRe�t; N NORTH ELEVATION' WRAT P-LEVAT[nid- I EAST,"EUVATIO ISOUTWELEVATI.ON, PAA. A lq,, TY CF RAINCHO CLrANIONGA l� Jt i iC`'..5� 1. �p.. .}: - •.S i. WEST El. EViktibN EAST ELEVATION ,�,6: =,x =a• SOUTH ELEVATION _� �r'fl �I 4,Ylx,a�ili �ltf, a nh11M� a uxitlly XNpm ,•.+ t tU '�'j�`1' q�t�.Yj�it]I�:j i;. `" ."'• f 1 h • OS 1 E PAD.- NORTH ELEVATION :vas H CITY OF 191-16 KANNM DIVISMI f SCALE: I Ul Itj Lwu LU LU 0 US (3 U) Lu la us z LL I -J. 0 -4 0 Ow -S c 14 w z LU CC IL uj a WA tu x c in w h 0 low; It" I 16� 4p Alm 15 • ul "i., 5 1. — in qw?'� ti.0 4 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA-PLANN�,"tfl'rXG COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL, USE PERMr,.::.NO 18 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN $.2" ACRE INTEGRATED SHOOPING CENTER, CONSISTING OF 4 RETAIL BUILDINGS TOTALING $7,581 SQUARE FEET LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOWEVARD AND HELLMAN AVENUE IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT - APN 208 - 261 -5$ A. Recitals. (I) NuWest has filed an application frr the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit No. 87 -16 as described in 'the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On the 101h of November, 198'; the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly na,�;ced public hearing on the application and continued this project to the Decker 9, 1937 regular ,�eeting at the request of the residents and with consent of the applicant. (iii) On the 9th of�DecetnV�ar, 1987, the Planning Commission of the City Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly ►)aticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing. (iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. 6. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is her &by found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows; 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- refrienced public hearing on November 10, 1987, including written and oral s�aff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby spitifically finds as follows: Boulevard, Hellman Avenue application Hel ms applies enue with a pstreetbounded frontage of o1,l535. feet and lot depth of 612 feet and is presently vacant. (b) The property to the north of the subject site is developed with a motel, mobile home park , the property to the south of that site is single family homes, the property to the east is developed with retail commercial shops, and the property to the west is apartments. E-- Y1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -16 - NUWEST December 9, 1987 Page 2 (c) The proposed project complies wi�j the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan in that: The site plan design and architectural style enhance the unique character and Identity of Rancho Cucamonga; and, the site plan design is integrating the existing Taco Bell restaurant and eliminating the existing driveway off Foothill Boulevard; and facilitates efficient and safe vehicular traffic along Foothill Boulevard. (d) The identified potential adverse environmental impacts have been addressed with mitigation measures being added to the project and adubd as conditions of approval to ensurf this project would not result in a decrease in environmental quality. 3. Based upon the substag��f -evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public'�(iearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: ;I (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious is properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that �,he project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the Californ ,a Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby f/sues a Negative Declaration. r 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set i6rth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the / attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this!/reference. Planning Division; (1) The pedestrian connection between -Shop 43" and Retail "C" and between Retail 119 and Shop "2" shall have additional pedestrian amenities such as benches, free - standing potted plants and adequate lighting for safety purposes. The building elevations along these two pedestrian >. connections shall have recessed window areas rather than popped -out window areas. Detailed _J Ll lu ft I PLANNING COMMISSIOW RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87-16 - NUWEST December 9, 1987 Page 3 design shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. (2) All pedestrian pathways and across circulation aisles shall be of textured treatment such as interlocking brick pavers, exposed aggregate or -a-,,, combination of both. Samples shall tA td�Wtted for approval by the Planning Division prier to issuance,,,o-f building permits. (3) The �Xistlng stamped concrete textured pavement '7 in tha"I'lexi sting driveway off Helms Avenue shall be , "'r(aced with textured material consistent e shopping center. (4) Pedi14 `.an amenities shall be,ni-ovided in front of (5) Ra dom�ttackinq of roof tit' shall be provided. (6) A significantly greater amount of trees, as well as increased number of box sized trees, shall be planted along Foothill Boulevard. (7) The corner f Foothill Aoulevard and Hellman -Xienuie' and along Foothill' Boulevard shall have soe&ial landscape treatment consistent with the suburban -parkway de; ,19n guideTines a? the ,.parkway foothill Spetific Plan. The parkway characteristics shall Include informal clustering of London Plane trees, California Sycamore and Crape Myrtle, rolling turf berms, undulating sidewalks and hardscape to compliment this informal landscape treatment, Detailed design shall be subject to City Planner revi;_Z approval prior to issuance of building perm As. (8) An increased member of trees and box sized trees shall be planted along Hellman Avenue to make up the landscaping along the public right- of-way consisting of a 12 foot wide sidewalk and a 3 foot high flat wall. A landscape mound should be provided up to the 3 foot high flood wall. (9) Within, plaza areas, special landscape treatments such as accent trees, specimen size trees and increased number of trees shall be provided. PLANNING I��' T r a � e �, „> , u� °wry CONDITION& USE PERM T 87-16 - NUWEST ! December 9, 198 Page 4 1 (10) Dense landscaping shall be provided along the entire south property boundary in front of the six itot high block wall with trees, shrubs and appropriate ground cover. In addition, bouganvillea vines or another type of vane that Will grow along this entire stretch of bock 'wall shall be �Aanted to discourage graffiti, and discourage O',"Ie from climbing over. ,1 (11) All galls such flood walls, retaining walIs,X0 screening walls be of decorative desic,-.' consistent with tNie architectural style. (12) Dense lancoping should be provided within the 10 foot la dscape area along the entire south - property boundary with evergreen trees, shrubs and appropriate ground cover. (13) All service and delivery activity along the rear serv�re driveway shall occur between the time of I ”. and 9 p.m. (14) The developer shall provide security personnel to patrol the site daily and at all times. Documentation shall be submitted to the Planning Division and kept on file. (15) The block wall and landscaping along the south property boundary shall be designed to attenuate noise. An acoustical study shall be submitted to verify noise attenuation for Planning Division review and approval prior to issuance of build��g permits. (16) Signs shall be conveniently posted along this rear service driveway and parking area for "n, overnight parking", and "employee parking only." (17) All light pole fixtures shall not exceed the height of 15 feet measured from the finished grade. Wall mounted lights for the rear elevation, shall not exceed 15 feet measured from the finished grade` of the parking lot. All lighting fixtures skull have shielding mechanisms to prevent light and glare into the southerly properties. (18) A unit,�rm hardscape and street furniture treatment including trash r:?ceptacles, free- standing potted plants, Me-racks, and light bollards, etc., shall be utilized for the shopping center anti shall be designed to be PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -16 - NUWEST December 9, 1987 Page 5 Ii compatible with the architectural style. Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. (19t The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved site plan which includes architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping and grading on file with the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein and Development Code regulations. Engineering Division (1) Flood protection measures and necessary easements shall be provided as described in the preliminary flood report and as may be required by final flood report to include, but not limited to, a Catch basin and storm drain system, flood walls and road driveways, (2) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunica,�ions and electrical) on the project side' of Hellman Avenue shall be undergrounded along the entire project foontage extending to the first pole south of the project (all poles along the project frontages shall be removed) prior to public impro=�ment acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one -half of the Cii adopted cost for undergrounding from future development and /or redevelopment as it 4xcu1'5 on the opposite side of the street. (3) "No parking any time" zones shall be provided along Foothill .Boulevard and Hellman Avenue to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 6.The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify -to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS IOTH DAY OF NO6MBER, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA14ORGA 8Y: airy T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: trad Buller, Deptify SecreMily �'rfS� Pl.A�iPi� 4 Ni NO COW CTI OIt „�: NuwEST December 9, 1987 ` Page 6 G n I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Comaission of--the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do herd certify that the foregoing Resolution duly erd regularly introduced, pmed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucaa at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of ]iovem r, 1987) by the fol l dwi ng ate -to -wit: AYES: CO MISSIONEitc: f- NOES: COWISSIONERS: ABSENT: C MKSWONERS: 9 E > L Vr �o =1 °MI l -Uf fix ` r 11 Y NN 4 v 2 N g 0 LI -�"° ` _ m. ^ate N� V Y♦ `�`. tl L �w 6 Y ° p. a J 3 ^� s ^ y ^ QYp� g j TL �T6 s NW Y+•^ yµuL • N Y� ° � �Y µ� 7E aY tY! 3�_Yy�NYLLU:I « >sY :(E KNi♦83'w Y H 2* 2 A i N O Y Is Y a ,.. o '.- Y L C� � q �Jzz nj 7 ` ^ Y 4 Y N~ C tl c � HIM4 r Y N V µ ag. V a _L6 1 N N N its s yi QY��iY µ it EA � µ Y o � . Ss d At .V.♦ ~ J N !Mf F- i' 2* 2 A i N O Y Is Y a ,.. o '.- Y L C� � q �Jzz nj 7 ` ^ Y 4 Y N~ C tl c � HIM4 w W 3 l N�� 9 tuyn V Y. Be- L �y i *GxV' :R ',.IN liN pS, � V w Vd w� Ate.'^ gqVJNp@uyyliV.p �Q�' LAN tJ n,Mp ip C sNs VO YpY ls" �,. ^7M� tl01 Y' C CC as a3 ^vt �C3fi ^}�m�'i n sl :4a„1 1 LM� Sg N u a " 1� V ^ w. t j � Y} { '� µ N „g• �. Cp_ = S L .. {t �Ct 4.A VV p= `Y w e� o �p 'p� r Co w =M 3 Oi�01 tl ���R -XI~. q$ V �GI Ara NC]L. 46 Si SYyy� ..Ry� � �yi ■�[p,¢��wV.�^ LitG•�aq� 3yV.� 1�� ����♦.pM y p Hwy Y � � _ C� �. ZiY -i L4 '• 1 yyY ��n *QY g9fLR }N�Q ~ V`�w N Nyr^ Mal Ar. J 1z Hl n, :Y� V•�. ` Q jtl'��yLN LrJ V `iR N 'YO it a6 g�s a 2 ; iA g .w1 am=» *mac Y. 3� al S Uzi q M y L e $ 6 i yM p TY Vw ^R N� +r pw�r »i1L .. V. ug p w �r u0 .'E g S � �+'• Vktig n HA �t p� iW y gs, �}Nt' ) C qM`� Ga � Y S=M O Y� a�gtLS��y M'. �ApL �Ir�5 +g0 -e r$w2 k-1 MR- „�+°L. Wsiq$��.f V*-E y i•.w. p �.� .r. ;� a" trees �:� a...w�'}.t�` : sG+ ir'� 'per` s ^ �• = R � Y � Y ^ µ d Y M �• y� ■ L � i rN a • � � � a � O � � V p � _ OCy c��' �w �• d�r 'lTp.. 4 � V NL40 A.�.�� � MV^ N Ng aY'w.^. YS� �,. V+`'^ M *- , o AMYL �ii �y O/ V w tb ViA !i � !'it 4+ C�•p sp V otl p1 Y' � �p Yj � ��ILM■ p w.V � <�A L �VVSNC . �m D r4€wG aw te 1�5.. . .+��PF . • •M w��[[ r \�� a ` rtpL, r �O tgj � ��p��:� a �� 1 «.`�. i ^3'. L r¢ .r B Y; i yyY j yA pL. ��� p4 F��8T _ «u �,1 g � H L � Nv C V4 y ttf \ys' A sal 14 a �g zillZ4 4 z V2. . g, tryJ Ca Mi gl: f V N a -?a C E- .04 1 _k q nlu Nil zo -l"! a$ .12"$ "i 3 is I lz- _iu -Is, L 1; - x Y, - &Z &fF:E 3E *i ly-2;j -11 A A. -t 3. 214 Isrz.x -fee I A cis 10 m to 01 Y Y u vs gal— TL t =a a I -RE zu 75 c a ft aj - X3 I .2-21 ft IL S -o 0 oat AW 0= v c V W I 2.32 a I;w C- ta— 3. m 4 2o'• 3% r Z.2 E -a z =.tz -0 A c3ale -C 6 F_ uj 0 .c°.+'i{ .N�± ■�yC LY^. EP rkY�N�wC. �) � C`Yi� � P. 7�3 � �� }}}� ■��� 6 T ai .Z iyaGY.7 g`.,OU Y�p4 �. jig �+N•4�. ., +M.IN s .L .0 -all. VVCgLLYU TdiN� a CL 8$ - 4i I r�.o cis ^.Ca� a'.72`ts� ��� `� m L �xs i$ •,��� � y� S 04L''6 yI .3 N6w�.y wpV�eAA Yi .i e� wL~ ®N `�a p ■Y,M +� ^�, 6Y L pq� ®6 � ��ry' NlL�Mj �y��M MY•• u� O_R+ YY NSqA . Y yOi 3� tiW ^ 1�w �12Q fIt �wc d4 ] L SY } G N v ' .i' C�� 1.2O M r� w�w0 q� Vo^ ml g y� oy Na 215— 4 ,,,ttt3fff L06 $ ' ��ad„ �Y�. r� C YrY� • CS � G� y�c OOwyy wi � Nv 1 ~ NC` • Zia ti /yN� N u L 1 �q:5 ` aw Y �.� T ` 4 ® "�O�A � NM bC�■ y 1 C Yn� aY Oi qs �6e 006 . ,,yyee La _, `O R � � �dtM�.� p Rai SdjN L €CW `�° ep ��y.On EM Lg�eg `~ l'�i(o�NyNL {7' dG'JP� s i[ s ♦ •N�$+ a� $g N e YA s - _Yy u. - fl a NL A�$� p0 �� s N C y Cµ 1�i�6 _Y L~j M LNOY Vo- S �/ ���y.M IBv pds�M .YVCTy1�_ 9SyC°��'Q+� ^VYLp yY qpCC S1y �y N ��w� Oyt L NO��� �.�� i t r b� _�4�AC I ■��� ■a 1�NC VY VA1 � YL 4�w6 yyd is gp {.> W O U Lai N v $� y,$�w., vay xswY�d, y�M ay, � ai.,. `� "`* 9 L p Y Cw ba y v o Y N C 4 Y�w 1y. r6 !.E! c « a� L � Olr� '9. ♦ Nh�y N L X e Z Yr'so g$3 ba te is ♦^ p Q f. ■. N Y y LW a Yy p NCO m �si 4 w yi yan« aw•t'1�gM _w �tiV �.� s .4 -Y � e♦ 71f � yN��S �M gyp. `6r. tl � LyW J NC ITS RV y� M C1 q d yy� wi yy © y;1 v(}1 Y Mq ywVUy sqy "ap aV w bM w fL�iV S6V V�i� 6 V4�M 40 x.4[ yi a� G..ri � K`� Q* yy•• LN W iMMy1 get E YL ?Y .M « V w N 4.r �r � v y a � � �f ♦ A r L Cw L 3 .. L.�.. y IL iw�i� ,g .LTVq _ r L Y 92 ar Av yp CgCg C w os Pota ae «ii y c 00 YY.. y 9y. ,Y {�_♦ �y� KR �q �u y�f�6. yyp. ,.. YY CY ��NO NMi N4 4yp ^9� OOs� w'QN �tL G� N y'' Y so N qy qy� M pq by d ..p +s '• Nb 1 �1i��Yy pwwf�,�iQ�.� Gy�«....� • _a ~rg yy1 py$ pCW Y�Y« C �`°C�NLp a G NM �I p eaty w yN .+• u« N. yMYfy L O y 9 N Y, .3; TL N «y p 4y�iL}_N y M _wYP w ^N p • 'i'� iW:•L M qty q V 0o L�w. ♦ w Vs A.a N M WN W VV q. v`a 0.2 d V 4 ft 'I L� w � {a C Y i t $ w 1Y ✓o y^ V q o V L a 6 r S w L C 8 Y N a_t$L i�✓'•u� Y _l 4 C � w Y L N N p0 . Lr N ^ K�► W i m� CA� a; u E ✓ 4 «_ 1y 0, K C 8� af$i. •.s. '� ya= L i ✓ ^N iY ✓ QQ �_ ■ � w � � L V .3 yT Y L a O M rp V�u ✓ �g �€' n Q Ewa a~ ✓ 1 I let . N Y y I 1 Og 000 ��0p0 O apL. MyyC �Y .'Si >``•y4 W 'k � `6�'rA.�Y N ry L M`— U ✓ yr M M °� i3 � ✓ 7 V p� N „m �Y I. G OY 4� YW t v� O qq L�4�•p • CC.�r� tp��O w.0 CMZM� C o � N C � rv. NN O •CC. W�p4 M p0 qN w�tv- g�Y ON �y_N •� y�rA x'+ 4i G�'/��4 i O 4 � L isy�` �r y pp�� $OW �p YYy�O J Lev �cyC � 0`■M GNLI LIYpYC NSW x1 YNLO! 46W 4-11-5 v om>.�p N _ H � to p rr -Q �r 2 oe Y Y y u € r. .44 py~G� pY r YC N ?a r CC r M N y •C+Q � O C Y V� 4 ass .Z �{�`y`/ yvy�8 VYL �` Li O.~. i✓.a QYN� f�Y si Y gg i$ 1= �:. � - V 'O T +� N V^4NN.,, W'!q ^^ p Ly'' Y6 aT+ �'Jf irL OIw YYOQ i qw ^ 33�`Y IT V +^ V� YMY Yy�1 ✓ _ � pT V,y 6 0 �1� Lwy� Ni 6`;� •fir iCV i L!.� Y.L �Ce }�YY WYM"Y y✓ + •g P aY�a. 4 Z w � {a C Y i t $ w 1Y ✓o y^ V q o V L a 6 r S w L C 8 Y N a_t$L i�✓'•u� Y _l 4 C � w Y L N N p0 . Lr N ^ K�► W i m� CA� a; u E ✓ 4 «_ 1y 0, K C 8� af$i. •.s. '� ya= L i ✓ ^N iY ✓ QQ �_ ■ � w � � L V .3 yT Y L a O M rp V�u ✓ �g �€' n Q Ewa a~ ✓ 1 I 11 11 let . N Y y I 1 Og O,:tM �w � L± yL� v g J ^PL i Y ry L M`— U ✓ yr M yy fs V NM °� i3 � ✓ 7 V p� N „m C u s ml ra X3 'iMee RndV. rv. YVYO✓Q W�p4 M p0 M1iyyi ICi�' w�tv- g�Y ON �y_N •� y�rA x'+ 4i G�'/��4 i O 4 � L isy�` �r y pp�� $OW �p YYy�O J Lev ^pd �jt �V 33 0`■M GNLI LIYpYC NSW x1 YNLO! 46W .i.. � � N _ H � to p rr -Q �r li V 11 11 t .. 0 9 ~ L V~ 4 y� 4 4 « A� ♦ N u r Nr Y. p r+y y Sapp Y o V °jv s f r a p �pyi C� �ta. QNQV iy- 4 N V Myy p� G i Y y eO C L �� ^ {{.. r � •yam Y � � 6 Y • Y C..ii M �t 3 6~ ID MyYSY 'pg( ,CY 4 LA Is 1 O. M Q 6 10 3i cs \1 I' LR oy a �� let faa 3 « c N M � + y 4i .M jab N Y L Y Q 3 3 p Y w ° 1 -2 N ^ C ° Y i� V. � � may= • yV i 4 Y e isms b f ~ L V~ 4 y� 4 4 « A� ♦ N u r Nr Y. p r+y y Sapp Y o V °jv s f r a p �pyi C� �ta. QNQV iy- 4 N V Myy p� G i Y y eO C L �� ^ {{.. r � •yam Y � � 6 Y • Y C..ii M �t 3 6~ ID MyYSY 'pg( ,CY 4 LA Is 1 O. M Q 6 10 3i cs \1 I' 1i let faa 3 « 7i 51 N M � + y 4i .M jab N Y L Y Q 3 Y w r" i� V. Ct ^_ :kT s ` L R N� • aN L L .2 `y, vsQ N p G P �P6 }�({ O..d A $.em F NC 1i DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: .�* c.. � \J --- C= OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT U �t S. M= 1977 j� December 5, 1987 / Chairman and Members of the Planning Commissicn Brad Buller, City Planner Scott Murphy, Associate Planner r ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13748 - residefflal subdivision a5d des-l`gn review or single family lots on 65 acres of land in the Low - Medium Residentiae District (4-8 :dwelling units per acre) located at the northwest corner of Highland Avenue and Milliken Avenue - APN: A portion of 201 - 271- i 55. Associated with the project is a Tree Removal Permit requesting the removal of 19 mature trees. i I. PROJECT AND SITE DESSRLPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of subdivision map, conceptual site and gracing plant, conceptual landscape plan, tree. removal permit, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Project Density: 3.57 dwelling units per acre. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning - North South - vacant; Flood Control - Single Family Residential Under Construction and Vacant; Victoria Planned Community - Low - Medium Residential 14 -8 dwelling units per acre) and Village Coamerc,91.,` East - Vacant a6d Single Family Residential; Caryn planned Community West - Deer Creek Channel; Flood Control D. General Plan Designations: rojec Site - ow- a ium esidential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) North - Flood Control South -• Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) and Neighborhood Commercial East - tow Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) West'. - Flood Control 9 ITEM f , 0 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTA'``TIVE TRACT 13748 - AHMANSON KTAES December 9, 1987 -Page 2 E. Site Characteristics: The site is presently vacant with an�� average slope of approximately 5 percent from north to south. The site is bounded on the north by Banyan Street, on the`eW, by Milliken Avenue, on the south by the future Foothill Freeway, and on the west by the Deer Creek Flood Control Channel. There are several mature tree3 scattered throughout the southern portion of the site.( II. ANALYSIS• A. Background: an July 29, 1987, the applicant submitted a Tentative Tract Map application to coincide with the General Plan and Develop`; *nt District Amendments to change the existing designations frbL Medium Residential and Flood Control to Low- Medium Residential•. The original tract map submitted proposed 231 single family lots on 65 acres of land. During the Planning Commission's review of the General Plan and Development District Amendments, conc2tin was expressed by members of the Commission r=elating to the triangular parcel between the southwest corner of the tract and the flood control channel. The Commission directed staff to confer with the San Bernardino County Flood Control District to see if the parcel was surplus °and, if so, to incorporate it into the design of the tract. Subsequently, the General Plan and Development District Amendments for the Low - Medium Residential designation were reviewed and approved by the City Council. The Low - Medium dezignation became effective December g 1987. B. General: Following the Planning Commission meeting on the- Genera Tan and Development District Amendments, the applicant has been in contact with the Flood Control District and found that the triangular piece at the southwest corner of the site is indeed surplus land and the District is interested in selling the parcel. The applicant has expressed a desire to acquire the parcel of land and has been working with the Flood Control District to complete the transaction. In the interim, the applicant has revised the Tentative Tract Map to include the "residual parcel" into the design of the subdivision. By doing so, Street "D" will be finished off with two additional residential lots and one common lot for storm: drain and pedestrian connections to the channel. Also, Lot 128 and Lots 132 through 136 will be extended further to the west. The net effect is an increase of 1 residential lot over the original submittal. The 232 residential lots will range in size from 6,724 square feet to 17,215 square feet in area with an average ! lot size of 9,689 square feet in area. PMP� NING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT 1ATINE TRACT 13748 - AHMANSON HOMES aP, ber 9, 1987 P1r43 c in that the ownership of the "residual parcel" has not,'changed from the Flood Control District to the applicant, staff suggests that a condition of approval ba attached requiring Lots "A", "8" and "C" shall be provided at the terminus of ?' Street "D" to allow for the future development of the "residual parcel" if Ahmanson doesn't close escrow before fine"; map recordation. r' C. Zonis The "resides )parcel" J,,5 still zoned Flood Control an , as such, cannot be ' developed with residential uses. This parcel was not included In the previous ,Development District Amendment because the Flood Control's decision to dec',,are the land surplus was not known at that time. Therefore, the Development District Amendment must be approved by the Planning Commission and the City Council to change the existing zoning from Flood Control to Low - Medium Resi.dentiai. D. Design Review Committee: In addition to the subdivisk_-A apR Ica on, he app ic`ant has also submitted floor plans and elevations for review and approval. The applicant is proposing 5 floor plans ranging in size from 1,664 square feet to 2,320 square feet in area. The plans consist of one one -story and four two -story units. Each floor plan includes three elevations. 1. Lot 230 should take access uff of Street "A" 2. The wall along Milliken Avenue should be designed to provide variatior in plccement, particularly north of Street "A ". 3. Along thi -°outh tract boundary, the units should be 4,�tback 30 to 40 feet from the sound wall, The Committee may accept a 25 foot setback on Lot 127 ag, -a minimum. 4. The slopes within the freeway right -of -way and flood control easement should be planted for erosion control. E. Tree Removal Permit: In conjunction with the development of e sa e, a applicant has submitted a tree removal perir,t requesting the removal of 19 mature trees scattered throughout the southern portion of the site. With the �.�Rlopment of the tract (grading and improvements), preservatiii of the trees is not practical. Therefore, staff recointreniii removal of the trees. in keeping with the policy of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, the trees must be replaced with the largest specimen size available as determined by the City Planner or thei\ Planning Commission. F -3 i PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 13748 - AHMANSON HOMES Dtcemb6r 9, 1987 Page 4 F. Environmental Assessment: ing the Environmental K11st, s27.7 na-s-Td-enfi In complet Chec ffed that the site may be subject to significant noise.levels from the future Foothill Freeway. The acoustical report Indicates that the south portion of the tract will be subject to noise levels in excess of the maximum City standards. The report indicates that the noise 14Vels can be ref4iced to a less than significant level by providing a sound barrier ranging in height from 13 to 15 feet along the south tract boundary and a wall ranging in height from 6 to 10 feet along the east tract boundary, south Of Street "A". With the Inclusion of these, recommendations as conditions of approval, staff feels that a Negative Declaration can be issued. If the Planning Commission concurs with these findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate if the project is approved. 111. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the General an and Development Code. The project, with the addW*ttiqation measures, will not be detrimental to the public heallih or safety, or cause nuisances or significant advsrse enviro;;;lj�tal impacts. In addition, the proposed • use and site plan, together with the recommended conditions of approval, are In compliance with the applicable provisions of the Development Code and City standards. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Daily . Report newspaper as a public nearing, the site has been pd.? ea witfj -if large notification sign, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the site. V. RECOIAENDATION; Staff recommends that the planning Con - P'ssion approve 7re-nTa-Eve Tract 12748 through adoption of the �,_,iched Resolution with Conditions, approval the Tree Removal Permit, and issue a Negative Declaration. Resprtful lY_s_Wmittdd, J B ler City ,Planner BB:SM:te Attachments, Exhibit "A" Tract Map Exhibit "B" Site/Grading plan Exhibit 'C" - Landscape Plan Exhibit 00" - Building Elevations Exhibit "E", - Tree-Removal Plan Resolution of App•��al with Conditions f4 elk IL Tib, is. L- -AT rl -!jb 7 - 4i 4 1 of alrtau oicodoul CITY OF ,�v "RANCFK) CUC-�,Njom- .A- ,A PLVtiNl.\X,- Divsm ITEM: If 14- TITI E- EXHIFAT--24— SC-%LL .NA WTJ CITY OF NCHO CUC-�,,x,,ONGA RA, PLANNING TITLE: EXHIBIT. SC ALL: IL Ir Ll Cl_ "Y C F RANCHO CUC-�.-vjo, ,\,GA PLANNING DIN'ISM -F -j ITE.M. EXHIPAT- SCALL: rY I �l u- It . . . .... ... ... ,V ~ ow ' _ sunsnv _ rvsal 1 urr __�__. ut LLI t• 4f � � C s3f. 1. k ff f O mi `.vim •x s^- -� � t Lt..,`` �-% �� �1 � -- r ~ -... _, � ,..� _.,.+ ---�- i- l�t•1KV4d� Y133H� H33iS CIT. f ITEM: " R.. i 'Cil,.faG�,� rte TITLE. $VIWN EXHIPAT= °df SC -�i t� -1C1 MW 8330 CITY OF - ITE RANCHO CUC,�,,NION, M: , GA TITLE: --j(4 PLANNM. EXHIBIT. SCALE: .2 r-Ali 8330 CITY OF - ITE RANCHO CUC,�,,NION, M: , GA TITLE: --j(4 PLANNM. EXHIBIT. SCALE: t 1' a�i n � � � • L ` s � i! Fl to T f � SR L �y� ���• �. f � �,, $ � ; � � ; ice-` _ ,,,, z 433a*3 �.+ I3N14tlNO n OF KIN 1TE�1' ��:�H I: � a ap �; i r ti - �- y I� R f Ed33D � 1 jt; CITY OF RANCHO CUC-�,Njo PLANN DIX'LSM TITLE: iT — LL �r Rolm o'now it W, J.P I" fii��= mvi mi saw ION , INE1166 In fat °tea 1 .LIZ: � U MAOMMMENowt, 7. g r� i� � � . • lk��������u�l is �.��.� gg: 7. Y t rte" t. r1� n MIN mown I MAIM! °a gi�l�.Iflile . i lifloll AL S� wwas S +. .,�� �altl�t•i 1 t �t�itutt° °°°tea•. ` i tiw M M wrsai OW r "=JMLM gill K. ` C � P.� ALIN 'R�' rrrinla!i�- y �iy TI` , rrrinla!i�- all. m X13. V` Y i' �� •� �(" mar �i �F • + .i�Tl ,� � j • C tN Vill it • s,- r r; IR IMI -d Lam•_ - ��/'� i i I� TITLE- r RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE'PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT WAP NO. 13748, AND DESIGN REVIEW THEREOF, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIOR OF 232 "SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 655 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW - MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT _(44, DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HIGHLIUND AVENUE AND MILLIKEN AVENUE -- APR 201- 271 -55 A. Recitals. (i) Ahmanson Homes has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 13748 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application "., (ii) On the 9th of be,ember, 1987, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing: on the a- plication and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the 'Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: I. This Commission hereby specifically finds '.har all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part ;A, of this Resolutior are true and corn', -t. 2. Based upon substantial evi etice presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on December 9, 19f7, including written and oral staff reports, together with public teFtimany, th'.3 Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the northwest corner oil Highland Avenue and Milliken. Avenue with a street frontage of 2142 feet along Milliken Avenue and a lot depth of 115-8 feet and is presently vacant, and (b} The property to the north of the subject site is Jesignated for flood control purposes an1 is currently unimproveA, The property to "`1tne sash is designated for the future Foothill Freeway and is presently vacant. The property to the east and west are designated for residential uses. The property to the east is developed with single faalily residences and the property to the west is vacant; and (c) _ The project, with the recommended conditions of approval,'' complies w�tih all minimum development standards of the City of Rancho Cucamongai. t F-3O s;y u' ,., ..f., PLANNING COWISSION RESMUTION NO. C TENTATIVE TMT 1374$ - AliMANSOk ifOi:IGS December 9, 1937 Page 2 ` (d) The development of 232 single family pats or 65 acres of land is consis ent with the i.o;e- Mediln Residential land use designWon of 'tile General Plan. 3. Based up?r the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- refeeenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set fo.th"in paragraph I and 2 abo)n, this 1�omnission hereby fftids and concludes as follows; ,L (a) 7fiat tentative tyl�ct is consis er t with the General P ?an, Deve1o*nt CV66, and specific plans, and (b) The design oil imp ovements aF the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of deve'opment proposed; and (d) The design, of the subdivision is not likely to cause' substantial anvironment�.l damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause l serious public health problems; and ti (f) Tice design of the tentative, -tract wit. not conflict with any easement ut;quired by the public at 'urge, now of record, for access thrt..gh or use of the property vithin the proposed subdivision. 4. its Commission hereby finds and c rtifies tha. the project has been review)d and cotisidered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Ac{ of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negativr Declaratiou. $, Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 2.and 3 above, Of.; Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attarhed heretzt and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division (1) Lot 230 shall take access off of Street "A ". The revised site plan mall be reviewed .arsd approved by the City Planner prior to the i yuan of building permits. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 13748 - AHMANSON HOMES December 9, 1987-_ PaTti 3,-,, (2) The following items shall be incorporated into the final landscape plan which shall 'be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits: (a) The wall along ". Milliken Avenue shall be designed to provide variation in placement. The wall south of Street' shall be located at the top of the slope ind a City landscape maintenance easement shall be provided for the area between the wail and the Milliken Avenue right -of -way. (b) The slope& withtn the future freeway right- of-way and the flood control easement shall be planted fv,)r erosion control. (3) Lot W shall be improved to allow pedestrian access to the future regional trat" located along the Deer Creek Flood Control Chaff P4-j,. Improvementt shall incl0e a si4twa,'k. low bevel lighting, decm-ative bl ocL walls on both cider, landscaping and Irrigation. The lie plans shall reviewed and approved by the City Planner and City Engineer prior to the issuance of building permits. (4) A pedestrian access shall be '-proy"llaJ at the northern portion of the site to con';e,t to the future regional trail along the Deer C114ok Flood Cont'-,! Channel. The connection shall be a minimum width of 15 feet and shall be improved with a sidewalk, low level lighting, decorative Mock walls on both sides, landscaping and irrigation. The plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and City Engineer prior to -the issuance of - building permits. (5) The units along the south tract boundary, _!th the exception of Lots 127 and 128: shall be set beck a minimum of 30 to 40 feet fro i the ,,,perimeter block wall. The units on Lats L 7r ansi 128 shall be setback a minimum of 25 feet earn tho south tract boundary. The final planp "'Siiall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of,buildi"g permits. (6) A final acoustical analysis shall be subpu�tvoid for review prior to the issuance of building peio.mits. The report shall address any changes in ivii freeway deign and construction materials needed in the units to adequately mitigate potential --- noise impacts. k . PLANNING CWHISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 23748 - AHMANSON NAMES December 9, 1987 Page 4 (7) The approval for 232 single family lots is contingent upon successful arrytisition of the flood control parcel a-t the southwest . corner of the site and ap�.'ovat d'f i::,noelopwent District Amendment to change that parcel from "FC, (Flood Control.) to "Lip['` (Low- Medium, Residential), if the land c4h not be acquired, approval shall ne limited to 230 single lots. (8) The 19 trees to be removed shall be replaced with the largest nursery grown stowk available as determined by the City Planner. Engineering Division (1) The existing overhead utilities (telecosmo4cat.ion and electrical', on tie project side of H%hland Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the east side of Milliken Avenue to thc,first pole offsite west of Deer Greek Channel prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy of any buildings, whichever occurs first. The developer may request a reiabursw.nt agreement to re :over one -half the City adopted costs for Lndergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs - on the opposite side of the street. (2) The developer shall construct the entire store drain system frcu Deer "yreek Channel to and including the interim debris be'sin on the north side of 82,ny n Avenue. (3) The developer shall fors a .separate assessment district for the maintenance of x6; Interim retention basin. (4) The deveiov ,r shall *nstruct the bridge ;over Deer Creek Cha»,c) for Banyan Avenue to the, satisfaction of the City Engineer. The developer shalt receive credit and a reimbursement from ttt? Systems Development Fee if approved by'; I �} PLANK NO �"iISSIO: RESOLlTI4N` !10. TERM VE T4tl�T 1NA - AHMANSON HOMES December 9, 1487 ,t Page 6 _ C. c-; �t (71��Jhe developer„ 0411 provide a drainage easement along. the north side of Highland Avende as "ditermined by the City Engineer prior to final map approval. (8) Banyan Street shall be constrycted to City half - street standards with a minim of 26 foot wide pavement Ktithin a minimum 4Q foot wide dedicated right -of -way. �r (9); -;The surplus land from San Bernardino Couhcy Flood Control District: in the 'southwest corner of the project shall be purchased prior to recordation of the fine "p and incor�vated in the final design: (10) All eb §ements and agrt ents with San Bernardino County Flood Control District shall be obtained, prior to recordation of the fina' map. l,1 6. The Deputy Secretary to tnis Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolutic—.,. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA EY s Larry T. "McA %,, chairman ATTEST: 13raa Buller, Deputy SecrEWY 1, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the pla?►ning Commission of 'the City of Wcho Cura nga, at a regular meeting of the Planing Coacmission held, on the 9th day -`._'_,tvber, 1987, by the following AYES: COM6f2SIONERS: NOES: COMMIWONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: o l - 4.'' 9L a D XE ouf Olt -�1Y 110 6NY� M N 3Z �« af 83 � a• Y H y'qp�sj >y>p y Qy � Gi �,, vg {p, 'uy.:• O YM�O yg6 aS aa Ma G O Oa Fr TL tja+ v .v a MiL�pJ'. CEIR E 26 7i s=' Nn K d •tl. fb .i �'� .� N M ! h {{ w kc n. �C• E $ y N ~ SOS zrj To ffi aft M �TLx ,$ Ash ,�� ��� • � L Nom d HIS, � -s��� a� =:E �' f9 8g ils L � � py Y ^a 3 a v a jN s 2 Y a 1S yy V V'Yg1 n n ,.iCp. � �n S6►A N NS «�w• � YV. XMay 4 6 Yi « 40 se N N N N =M W ffi aft M �TLx ,$ Ash ,�� ��� • � L Nom d HIS, � -s��� a� =:E �' Zyyo tl y y�w Kf •4Y Jzz� cz I "I \� wI L N 4 y p4 A u3 L Ce«77�!!. ry Bello R,�¢y� ^iY y��RY yiyy NLj•M9L �Lr gv« �L ��W 6N 1� C 73 w ?n Lf-4, M1 C o g s D N•� *Cy 33 CpY �yO �iC YCw. p.i wa � ti CU ils L � � 'Prx: ¢ C� 1 1S yy V V'Yg1 n n ,.iCp. � �n S6►A N NS «�w• � iA ay3^.Y� y XMay 4 6 6 « se N N N N =M W cz I "I \� wI L N 4 y p4 A u3 L Ce«77�!!. ry Bello R,�¢y� ^iY y��RY yiyy NLj•M9L �Lr gv« �L ��W 6N 1� C 73 w ?n Lf-4, M1 C o g s D N•� *Cy 33 CpY �yO �iC YCw. p.i wa � ti CU 0701 -02 0 12 -9 -S7 PC Agendas 3` kbpxca ""S �Yl ny.N u yp aa�. C i'aq�j ar «Nawfho��'� x rrt'eir N '.! Xv H us $ $ `$ ON E a aer Z. +� $ N ¢ S ° -_ _ "=� �'p "pgrF'aCNs a�= : "tic ':. H q d w^ 3 R V N T w$ �. O M` �j N N~ T. r L'N w u �yp g`e. w YNy BONN b@u {Yutka N =--22' p�{ ~ LG� N uY �y. �lr / Y 4 O / 1 N N q� 1 r r aC N CC pC Ji.E iLY�� ° LL V 0' C &e$s°A;"3N F WE yyN;!rL Lft ,�d W-3 �YY'���11+y�. ` 5$wtz �N NYp wa ^NCr ♦ S. § %.B y�y ® .��s MO pLL V U Q °Y'r IL y� N^`M 91M <1Rr <N 1M0 I�Mp. KNf0irn4. OI >�N°O <1iw L KV Y.�O.N a g eg v Lw g W!a o^ rI Svc 2— 21 u * Lg i jib yL NYO ■` N' .O � q y Y b xMN OOO r <C •�4� � �� N$ � �� U�Lw tly G rc �WN YYLpe�� dSOY tL_� Al ^O^ pL N YgOL� .0 C2 L R Y�a c Nrl C��V M F -37 G � C M � ppp}pp tYt oao • 1 « MMS a I <N � i gy ii NM��-1N Y C Y S sEr 8 �� yY Q m V g wC Y S °Lau. 2 E Wi(�ry +ryQ N� 'oCN 'qy Nt��L YN �Y eyYp�d .. i�A V ±N~y wy�naL N �CY1 Y rrN may: L �C a rt tYG mM U1MW � V N J Ir L .1 11 Q�e J Nit � LyY 66 Gf V p W O �6�tYiC Lp w �O p�YC �CM �O �yeC��pYNy � CY y04µ W ytSy'yq i�weG ,M YY Y �L 5-'* ` xra Qji M �F T ^OM a V Mpg Y. s M 6 Y Igniy�. = j =ire Unit N 6tl I'- q a Y Y y � 8 ysw°.a L,a J�yC V 4 yWV� yy q O. y V�N C�.R 7 LaL S ap� YY IN. C�C� Oy'q C � C ppp4F L V J . ��'Y� pCOY� QN+LV MVp R o 6 GGU Y >� Lq'C.^ .�p oa +Yid A all ,, ag q tt g5 apglr� Y Lo+ wa.v ram y C M 41 O1 vas- ime °w _LwR• ay.Y Y M t1 C ,4p Zv a; Sm ` 4- 4 _ ptJ �q�yY C e�Or OI ^q pwiig.. °Wr X. CC^ i M �aa��. $Y6 ��.i• 4. •O� i. -sfi a� L> r�g Nit � LyY 66 Gf V p W O �6�tYiC Lp w �O p�YC �CM �O �yeC��pYNy � CY y04µ W ytSy'yq i�weG ,M YY Y �L 5-'* ` xra Qji M �F T ^OM a V Mpg Y. s M 6 Y Igniy�. = j =ire Unit N 6tl I'- q a Y Y y � 8 ysw°.a L,a J�yC V 4 L 4 CQy� yy q O. y V M ✓ M fyt C 7 yyC S ap� YY IN. C�C� Oy'q C � C ppp4F L V J . g La R o q C p C Y >� Lq'C.^ .�p oa +Yid A 3:5 V; O^y ,p a wa.v ram y C ��ti Non. 6yqY M O1 vas- ime S � �C� S _LwR• ay.Y Y M t1 C ,4p Zv a; Sm ` 4- 4 _ ptJ �q�yY C e�Or OI ^q pwiig.. °Wr X. CC^ w M L G SQ.— Y T L �yy C y �Lpt C � �1 D SIN 6i I. I� P. R S IYLE CNO. O', ;yL YC L:YL.C> V O i UUp ~ C Z .YC �►1 �i l 1 Z L,a J�yC V 4 Uw+R YtlY'! �'�p�50. Na prL c wZ0 7 yyC S ap� »`j • CO yy qQ �� spy yq 96+C g La R o q C p C Y R_4 N 3:5 V; O^y py RPL L �ML Q aNV $R�L L..L. Non. 6yqY M O1 vas- ime y O �C� S NYL yYV. {L A® C ,4p Zv a; L Or R3 CC� _ ptJ �q�yY C e�Or OI ^q pwiig.. p�f� p'CU CC^ X-- aR.C. q T «41 L G SQ.— �►1 �i l 1 Z L,a J�yC V Y CI Uw+R G V y C O w.5 It N L M Y 7 yyC S ap� app iT L 2 pL i IL. w I. O^y Y py RPL L �ML Q q r+yK NPy i� �Viopppo �y �N �C� S NYL yYV. {L �4L y0. W_L ANA TN ,�jrp �`�■�pa :pp C 1a. Its D 3 ~4fl� ib, Y y U L 0 N I"f ]]]111 4s IT 7 v ISM uY L A � g Y pV 9 Y i�C Y i M � M NM{ C^ a� Y C� W N V 4 C C E� �0 E� IV. G y $m w� yY p�p y uy6� U1 as Cl Y N (� W U Lv07 C g yE O� Ii w p M a a w p w �a 33 r 4 N A 6 � v V =9 0 7 C M Y�V � m EXEC 7 f O l $ � g 40 Ao °v d app �y� mV {,M �Y 0i y w Ids3 Y r- .2 s.. W�VJ� W {� y W n f !t, a eaEw �� P UN, X �. `illll '� C4oY{�P g wpY4 a Y 14. �1 g 9 „k a A N b �d • aO M y O L C1 3w. �� ~•�L cQ� L�. � � v L it g q Y gY~`�f i1 4d r p -O N Y yy Sg Y v Y OG. �M O f.i0 M L o �I 7 v ISM uY L A � g Y pV 9 Y i�C Y i M � M NM{ C^ a� Y C� W N V 4 C C E� �0 E� IV. G y $m w� yY p�p y uy6� U1 as Cl Y N (� W U Lv07 C g yE O� Ii w p M a a w p w �a 33 r 4 N A 6 � v V =9 0 7 C M Y�V � m EXEC 7 f O l $ � g 40 Ao °v d app �y� mV {,M �Y 0i y w Ids3 Y r- .2 s.. W�VJ� W {� y W n f !t, a eaEw �� P UN, X &Z g g 9 „k a A N b �d • aO M y O L y.Y CYi. v Li�S O� � !� ��b .ti<V pygpy`jgg tO1V 'F•� N 1'f f' Yf N �l �l 1 I I F - - -w 7O C w m w w i1�0 L C” C CUM p SY �E O V ; MC LYY. ]yi�� pNO Y 6 L y� Y N C= t t Y C a�sll $ os b� P� �yyCO B. v y� Oal4 >� seas b &;ITL yy, T`� C . i • Y � R �9g g '30. C°s Hvi illb. (Y��uYi �O tj M S a x C p w CV p� W6 1 y°.DN p� a 1qy V V iy°m 2.2 + L d L p�c' 2ro Sauter 0 Y N °z p Y M � L) Y A W p L q RaAa V O �o V :�..J « Y FFC _ >IyL41 � ♦a NN g Y / rAax O w w�E N y f3 N.Y L � L � G LL� p � d�ir O ''P ty'S �' 3 Cµ p +a• •r ttNO �g4,r Y�. ya�a Fy •'N C�1Y. �F wJJ���d//y��U. y � Y��y Y 6 rq G. �'g yc G N■ 9C1i L�Ni N Vaa p.r aNt Q R t�a pi t'°� q YGy. �^ a •'�Vy ''J uC iM' N V iH N L w UV aL� as V C. Fit?0� h pyy yyy6y �SH�� �y ■ YM py L -Affi !� Cw'a•I 6. 44 seat'• y0`Y L ply A 53.E N J@ l'2�Y•wY�ie aN M y N 3 y Y J[ hL Syw �� 1a Y�Ct�~ C� 14� ."i' �^ /. ip! O • q9N yLY6 a• Y� 9.0y aa� L yr+ Q O �n,•iy 4�nCCWM pY r? �C� �A N� M +.. +VY4 YC M C qa AL` Y LQNY~ W@ +p i Y N °z p Y M � L) Y A W p L q RaAa 6 rAax O w w�E N y f3 � }YyZ Y Y L N N L� q0 s O M AN ^v � 4 $� 1i RA p �czr N v^ L N K M!y Y 1' L 7 Y Y q L. Q•p � Y O ^ww W o.@ M• y L A L„Q V 1a Yw � CY i OYLi i � Y N sY�.yN G y ^pq ��O 1 FNGG VW +l pM ao vY MyoY q'1 O, ate as C L Aiva+^ Is Aga 1$b QE 4n' 6J -i t g Lvt q O A Yi M Y g Lt. 4gg Yp F�c`E(yg ZW^6- T"t yy R ppy� t'1 pw Mr�,y ��C �� L � rG •Yy}gy u��LLr ���Sq "Lp1 .wa � YY. i N W f// 6 W 4 rp. •t G N G r �W Z V i 4a. �7 1 e V I IN Z O pet N $i v v t� • C Y s p p y V V � L e w~ �sC1�Y p pw�� ��yywryry L C q V li SC S` Y C O� YOy Y �Csl HON M aLr O'�"il S y Y @iuY p iS YO Q� C e� � d4j :� Ut 1 3°� L � Mw. Yp� pYYN Y y �y rw C�M�i YC 9` w 3� `d YC QJi -cm �C �.. K2 A`. N2.3 N � W r_ r/ t o R � I hLtn S4~.. �Y L Y 6 Y oil 5%S H 3« O is yp r'N ATE at® p w ,R{_/ asi u MS y S »y (Ms V Q go* N i a V Y mt; w RAS �M1 Y yJ W� Cil� w� WY StIN MAY Y O t✓i ° w "' t' S ^yyE 0y5 F, Sp O_yyypV CS V M_�1 Nr' i.i Ll4 2Qiti �Md M ! M { LZ A C° o r c c, r � � r e t tv -' s s$! W L w'rN. e ed° 3 Y Y pet N $i v v t� • C Y s p p y V V � L e w~ �sC1�Y p pw�� ��yywryry L C q V li SC S` Y C O� YOy Y �Csl HON M aLr O'�"il S y Y @iuY p iS YO Q� C e� � d4j :� Ut 1 3°� L � Mw. Yp� pYYN Y y �y rw C�M�i YC 9` w 3� `d YC QJi -cm �C �.. K2 A`. N2.3 N � W r_ r/ t o R � I hLtn S4~.. �Y L Y 6 Y oil 5%S H 3« O is yp r'N ATE at® p w ,R{_/ asi u MS y S »y (Ms V Q go* N i a V Y mt; w RAS �M1 Y yJ W� Cil� w� WY StIN MAY Y O t✓i ° w "' t' S ^yyE 0y5 F, Sp O_yyypV CS V M_�1 Nr' i.i Ll4 2Qiti �Md M ! M { li SC S` Y C O� YOy Y �Csl HON M aLr O'�"il S y Y @iuY p iS YO Q� C e� � d4j :� Ut 1 3°� L � Mw. Yp� pYYN Y y �y rw C�M�i YC 9` w 3� `d YC QJi -cm �C �.. K2 A`. N2.3 N � W r_ r/ t o R � I hLtn S4~.. �Y L Y 6 Y oil 5%S H 3« O is yp r'N ATE at® p w ,R{_/ asi u MS y S »y (Ms V Q go* N i a V Y mt; w RAS �M1 Y yJ W� Cil� w� WY StIN MAY Y O t✓i ° w "' t' S ^yyE 0y5 F, Sp O_yyypV CS V M_�1 Nr' i.i Ll4 2Qiti �Md M ! M { R � I hLtn S4~.. �Y L Y 6 Y oil 5%S H 3« O is yp r'N ATE at® p w ,R{_/ asi u MS y S »y (Ms V Q go* N i a V Y mt; w RAS �M1 Y yJ W� Cil� w� WY StIN MAY Y O t✓i ° w "' t' S ^yyE 0y5 F, Sp O_yyypV CS V M_�1 Nr' i.i Ll4 2Qiti �Md M ! M { M ! M { fl *I — CITY OF 9ANGHO CUCAMONGA f l ST"F REPORT DATE: Pecerber 9, 1987, TA: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FRUN: Barrye R. Hanson, SoTbr Civil Engineer BY Joe Stofa Jr., Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: ENti1LRW- NTAI ASS $SMSK AND TENTATIVE O'A E MAP 10972 - AFlMANSON 15E MO k �ffl- - A subalvisfen of 14.6 acres o ;ar into parcels in the KWdeAtial Area( 'located at the southw est ,: ,est cornea of Milliken Avenue and Bataan Street APN 201,- 271 -55 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Appmxvai of the proposers Tentative Parcel Map as shown on xhib t "B" B. Parcel Size' ; Parcel lrr- 9.9 Acres Parcel 2`- 27.2 Acres Parcel 3 \135.5 Acres 11 C. Existing tdhi� Residential D. Surrounding :.Q d Use: North Vacant South - Resdential under construction East - Resif�ential West - Florid Control Channel E. Surroundin General Plan and Development Code Designations: North - Flood`t�..- _ntO:l South - Residential East - Residential West - Flood Control (Deer Creek Chahnell �M r PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE PARCEL W 10972 - AHMANSON DEVELOPMENT CO AML DECEMBER 9, 1987 PAGE 2 F. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant with the land sloping approximately 5% to the south. II. ANALYSIS, The purpose of the Parcel Map is to create 3 separate parcels. Parcel i will be retained by the owner and reserved for the future Route 30 Freeway. Parcels 2 and 3 will be developed as phases of Tentative Tract 13748 [refer to Exhi }tit C), also on tonight's agenda. An offsite interium debris basin will be required on the north side of Banyan Avenue and a separate Assessment District will be required for its maintenance. All public improvements will bg. installed at the time`l . of development of Parcels 2 and/or 3. III. ENVIRORKNTAL REVIEW: the app'licart completed Part I of the Initial 4tudy. btaft conducted a field invest' ,4ation and completed Port II of the Initial Study. No adverse impazts upon the envir nv.>nt are anticipated as a result of this projint. Therefore, issuance Of Negative Declaration is appropriate. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Pubt1c Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in`the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been completed. V. RECOMUDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all nput RU elemersts of the Tentative Parcel Map. If after such consideration, thQ CO-W sion can recommend approval, then the adoption of the Attached Resolution and issuance of a "Negative Declaration would be appropriate, Respectfully submitted, g" W. !AW`''E Barrye R. Hanson Senior Civil Engineer BRii:3S:dlw Attachments: Vicinity Map (Exhibit "A') Tentative Map (Exhibit "B ") Master Plan (Exhibit "O") Resolution and Recommended Conditions of Approval f ,- . KI CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM NGA ENGUTEMING DAMON SITE rte: PARCEL tAP IQJ 7 VICIN/TY NAp s F` x F C •. �pp F C6 uj .r s ® cl 1 CJ fY �raa �M LL ii tJ1 J Q Nk 0" C� �1 � r 11 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP °UMBER 10972 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map "Ier 10972, submittEd by Ahmanson' Development, Incorporated, applicant, for he purpose of subdividing into 3 San Bernardino-,aSproperty t of alifnaniai identified ons APN(s1C201-- 271 -55. located at the southwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Banyan Street; and WHEREAS, on December 9, 1987. the Planning Commission held a duly adverti_-t,`,pubiic hearing for the above- descri5ed map. FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS i SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed iubdivision and improsements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: This Commission finds and certifies that the project ha —s— e n reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 10972 is hereby approved subject to the attached Standard Conditions and the following Special Conditions: S eciai Conditions 1. The following items shall be completcd upon development c, either Parcel 2 or 3: a. Milliken Avenue from Highland Avenue to Banyan Avenue, b. Banyan Avenue from Milliken Avenue to the west side of Deer Creek Channel including the bridge trer Deer Creek Channel, "y�'G t ,zy w. „n .. .�yx 'gf'�'p;'°°,g.'. .: #a F�•x"r�_`�z"-- •-+7�a J RESOLUTION TENTATIVE PARCtt MAP 10972 }� DECEMBER 9, 1987 PAGE 2 C. Street "A* from Banyan Avenue to Milliken Avenue, d. The offsite parlcw4y '1J rovexents for the above streets may�ie delayed unfit develapme�t of the adjacent property, v e. The e.tire, storm drain system from Deer Creek Channel to and including the, terium 4'bris basin on the north side of Banyan Avenue, f. The urdergroundin;g of the utilities along Highland Avenue, and g. Provide a drainage easement along the north side of Highland Avenue as determined by the City Engineer prior to Final Map approval. 2. Dratloiie control devices such as paved: ditches, A.G. berms or curbs -4hail be instilled along the earth side of Banyan Stret as approved by the City Enginee -. 3. Banyan Street shall be c, structed to City half-street standards with a minimum of 26 wide pavemdht Within a minimum dO�;`wide dedicated right-of- way- 4. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunication and electrical) on the project side of Highland Avenue shall be undergrounded from the ff;: t pale on the east side of Milliken Avenue to the first poi- ,offsite west of Deer Creak Channel prior to public improvement acceptan�'or occupancy k�f any buildings, whichever occurs first. The Developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one -half the City adopted costs for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. 5, They Developer shall form a separate Assessmant District for the maintenance of the interim riiention basin, &. The Developer f" aT construct the bridge over Deer Creek Channel for Banyan Avenue to t.` satisfaction of the City Engineer. The Developer shalt receive credit and a reimbursement from the Systems Development Fee if approved br the City Council. 7. Additional dedication for the access rams to the San Bernardino County Flood Control Channel at Banyan Avenue and the bridge crossing shalt be required to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and San Bernardino County Flood Control District. RE T0EN�T�uCpiT�iryi CAR9p,Ly 1097. PAGE 3 APPROVED ASS ,ADOP"IIID TKS Dk,;!? C, 1987. PLANNING COMMI#-N OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA14DNGK 13Y;�1 �_ Larry T. Mc e.: 'uhanl c, ATTEST: ' � BradBuller, pd.._ liecretary T, Brad Buller, Deputy St- retary of the Planning Commission of the City, of � Rancho Cucamonga, do ' hereby certify that the fore8oittg Resolution was duly and regularly introduced;, W.ed., and adopted by the Planning Commission of the Cii of Rancho CucaWao, at a regular meeting of the Planning'Comaission held on the 9th day of December, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: (t;- AYES: COK- UtSIONERS: V ii NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: X17 i a a y i� 3; n a 11 �_ �� �' � .;� day •� � ,� , w� its v o € 17 :xs INS. bra 1A1 A r Y� k 4 N V 4i w _a ar N S ` ' x , a, a �j a .,z lit 1 .2 Z-1 ;3 h _ x a n3 s TT ♦ y4 4 i—w N [1 N • S— i `lq. - H. s if 64 Y a'a• u � ! N • �� N Id 6Y ��� �� s i zE gal C-3q` `pp Y YW3C C b k Y 78-3 tit Is r �� 8 $ �E b# #per •� ^Y Y ^ M L 8 W • � '• +63 GIs N ••• '.N 14 T 1 q) �. ,1 N w, Ix a^ d 1 `! YL L Y~ � Y t fi N CITY OF 9',�N( t �O C�X "01,TGA 0 ST"IF",0REPORT DATE: Deceiubjar��9, 1987 TO'. ChaiM4n and M&Ibers of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City ,BY: Loox9_,_,Associate Planner SUBJECT: )64IRONMENTAL ASSESSME74T AND GRNF-Itz--�,11i &m jLmrmvairu* V7-nAC TAC Pt A request to a - d-Ane Eien I e-r-aT-7PTa—n Lim"se row) Low-Medium Rcsidential (4,-.8 dwelling uni ts, per acre) to Hi gb Res �-�-_nti al (24- 10 `�wii I i ng � un-, ts P,�Ir acre) for q,,05 acres of- land, I ocate<i o6' 'the South side of Rase Lfq% west of Archibald -.0N 238-031-18, 19. (Conti nued 0W -.14,9vembor 26, 1987. ) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMDR—AND rEVELOPMENT _' DISTRICT,, DIEVEL I W-ub - TAC . 0 quest tQ amend 53 I o n ttict-s-w4fp--fr-o-o-To-w-Medium ResidOAial (4-8 welling' U�Its per a&e) to High Residential- (24-30 dwelling )Uni S per acre) attached with the Sen"or,*Housing overlay isi� - !Ct (SWO) the base district for 5.05 acres of land, located on the south side of Base Line RoaC� W21St of Archibald - AP4: 2OS-031-18, 19-, iContinued from November 25, 1987.) �r.AVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMEN.,' AN6GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 87-04H, '=M EVELUPMENT--- A request7to ameng tne Land UsF Element of the General Plan from Low-Medium Residential- (4-8 dweiling units per acre) to Office for 1.69 acres of land . located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Lfte Road - APN: 208-031-17, 54, 55, 66 and 57. (Continued from flovember 25, 1987.) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT �,.Z!STRICT AMENDMENT 87-US - TAC�OEVE --dmen Developmenf-Districts map fr-o=Row-Medium Residential dwelling u6its per acre) to Office Professional for 1.69 acres of land, lot-ated on the west si4e of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road - APN: VI-1-03I-17, 54, 55, 56 and 57. (Continued from Havember 8,,/1987.j PtA 't C0 40, A AEPOR TAI:'D YLOPtflli Dec 97 Iii? . Page ,2 DEVFJ.,QPMEXT MR UT 47 -02, - TAC iiEY£tOPMGNT - A eve l oilmen° z Agreer►.rM a ween e. y o anc o ucamonga and TAC Development Cdrporation for the purpgs�e of J providing a Senior Rat,sing Project per the r uirements of the Senior lousing (vser'say ,4fist. ct (Section 17.20.040 of the Oevefio; nt : Co,+ ...' O�d'in ce 11511) for , 170 apartment units tG 0 lccated on the south -_ssde of Lase Line Road, West of Afthibald Avenue 208-031 -18 and 14. (Continued frcm November 251 2981.} 1. BACKGROUND: TAB, Development has s0- -I.ted a developmer; package, nc, u ng eneral P14w Amendments, Develo t District Amendmertts, Derign Re- views, and Development Agreement to develop a senior Musing project and adjacent modiral office buildAnl in the vicinity of the southwest corner of Base Line Road and'Archibald Avenue. The various Amendments and Development Agreement were continued from the, Planning Gommissior- meeting of November 25, 1987. A4 that time, the Design Reviews and Development Agreement ' were still not ye'c ready to schedule for Planning Commission review, Wt 'Cowlssion indicated that they wanted to review the total peoje °t at a s*tngle time with all the individua;l elements Included . therefore, the Commission continued the project twv (2) weeks to permit the opportunity to resolve the outstanding issues. However, as of this date, the applicant stilt' has not resolved tha remaining drainage issues per the direction of the Engineering Division. As a result, the Gesign Reviews are still not yet ready for Planning Commission review. 11. RECOMMENDATIGN• Staff recommends that the Planning Commi3:3ion con rise a-MoT the titled items as referenced U, the beginning of this report to the meeting of aartuary 13, 1987, ReS__l ' i d, Br City /Planner BB:BC:te 7 —RECEIVED CM OF ROM CCMiQNU DEC 0.:1987 IVALiLVIAI M J6,0.A r r; ,Vovamber 3o, 1987 City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancha Cucemongrg..Cu. 91730 -0807 Attq^ Bruce,rook Re: = 'en;or /-- ,cat Project Pzsalire Archibald >✓ear Bruce; Due to the incompletion Of Design Review, We respectfully request the planning commispion rk:riew, scheduled for December 9, 1987, receive a continuance to ,tun. 13, 1988 Thankq fcr your coo,Garatton. Sincerely,. TAC wtvelopment Corp, � ✓' i [ e M. Arran General Manager .i MA : ma Skid #u�nrss Cceettt Or„ 5�r. !! _ i 1l IFORNT 1736 -1 i r t i t�4.1 tarp F i 1 -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIVIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 6, 1987 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM' B R H ar S rye . anson, enior Civil Engineer ,r BY: Barbara Krall, Assistrnt Civil ,.Engineer If SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL ASAP 10783 - Wells Fargo Bank k - A swbdIvision of acres of an into 2 parcels in tie very low (2 DU`s1AC) Development District located at the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and Hillside Read. (APN 1061- 561 -03) ,r 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: ?j A. Action Requested*. Approval of the proposed. Tentative Parcel ;Map l.� • shown on x"'it t"B" B. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 3.16 acres Parcel 2 8.14 acres Total 11.30 acres C. Existing Zon i41;, Very low (2 DU /AC) Development District D. Surrounding Land Use: North - Vacant land South - Existing single family East - Existing single family West . Vacant land E. Surrounding General Plan and Development Code Designations: North - Vacant land s ath - )`,scant land . ,. East - Vacant land West - Vacant land ITEM K f� PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF KrPORT G PM 10783 - Wells Fargo B ;nk December 5, 1587 i Page 2 n it F. Site Chat "'tteristics: The site includes two singie family homes with an active citrus grove and vineyards. I II. ANALYSIS: The purpose of this parcel map is to create a separate parcel or the existing ranch house located on Parcel 1• and a larger parcel (Parcel 2) to be further subdivided into single family lots in the future. A .conceptual Haster Plan (Exhibit "C ") showing a possible configuration for future lots and circulation for Parcel 2 and' the surrounding area has been submitted to show that the property can be subdivided in conformance with the development code. The Archibald Avenue street improvements are existing with the exception of street lights, trees and trdil improvements. Hil:lside;Road, adjacent to the site, is scheduled to be corstructed ful' ~- width by the City, except for the trail improvements. The missing street improvements, trails and utility in -lieu fee payments will be completed upon development of Parcel 2 including those adjacent to Parcel 1. The Equestrial Trail Committee recommended the following conditions: 1. Full dedication for a 20 -foot Community Trail should be required along Hillside Road and Archibald Avenue. 2. Trail improvements for Parcel i should be installed at the same time the street improvements are installed. 3. Trail improvements for Parcel 2 should be installed with the future development of the site. The parkways, however, should be graded -to allow for equestrian and pedestrian circulation. 4. It is the intent of the Committee ti*.,^entinue the Community Trail on the north side of Hillside Road. Any aiternatives will be considered by the Committee in the future as necessary to provide logical .trail circulation. These recortmendatlons have been incorporated into the conditions of approval and will be accomplished as follows: 1. The dedications will be made on the Final Parcel Map (Standard Condition A.2.). 2. The missing street improvements adjacent to Parcel 1 will be completed upon development of Parcel 2; therefore, the trail improvements will-be completed at that time. 3. The Hillside Road Parkway will be graded with the City Project. Special Condition number 3 states that the Archibald Avenue Parkway shall be, _grade d.as approved by the Equestrian Trails,.' ittee prior to recordatfon of the Parcel (dap. However, staff feels-that, because the basic street improvements (curb and pavement) are existing and the parkway is currently relatively level, perhaps the Committee will determine that no further gradng'A.s necessary at this time. III. ENVIRO. NTAL REVIEW. The applicant;comspTeted hart I of the Initial to a ^ con ucted a field investigation and completed Part Ii of the Initial Stud. No adverse i4acts upon the environment are anticipated as a result of this project. Therefore, issuance of Negative Declaratf- 'is appropriate. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearin" ave been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily rA�ri Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider i all input an elements of ;the Tentative Parcel Map. If after such r consideration, the Commission can recommend approval, then the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaratior..,would" x: be appropriate. k Respectfully submitted, ,4,614l�lJy Barrya, -,R. Hanso!i Senifr Civit Engineer dRH :BK:sd Attaci:ments: Vicinity Map (Exhibit "A°) Tentative Map (Exhibit "B ") Master Plan (Exhibit "C ") Resolution Recommended Conditions of Approval 1 k RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COIMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 10783 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 10783, submitted by Wells Fargo, Bank, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing Into 2 parcels, the real Staterof Californian identified of asaAPN(s)u ©61-581 San the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and Hillside Road; and WHEREAS, on December g, 1987, the Planning'Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above - described map. NON, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNI'JG COMISSIgN RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the foll, -' "ing findings have been made: 1. That the -tap Is consistent with thneral Plan. 2.,. That the improvement of the propocad subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitai)le for the proposed development. j 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: This Commission finds and certifies that the project has - been reviews an considered in compli;;nce with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. �fentativesubject to t�e0attach dBStandardConditions andNthe1following Special Conditions: I. An in -lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the opposite side of Hillside Road and Archibald Avenue shall be paid to the City. The fee shall be one -half the City adopted unit amount times the lengths as follows: RESOLUTION r PAGE 2 a. ilill.slde Aba, - from the center of Arch .eld ' Avenue 44UOy (approximately 6931) to he last exiating'poli'• b. Archibald Avenue - from the center of Hillside Road to the north project boundary. 'E, Public *r yea�ents and in -lieu fees required for t Parcel shot '6A 40-Aarred. until the development or faarthee $001, 4 fdw of Parcel 2, Roth items shall 4 be securNad by a lien agreement.,,(--, 3. The parxwaOrs aong Ni11sioad and Archibald .. Avenue , ptall be graded n� appraved 'by. the Equestrian Trails `Oommi'ttee prior to recordation of the Parcel Nap, C 11 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS _DAY OF 1987. /! _ PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE C'CTY OP RANCNO,CUCAMONGA r BY: Larry arry1. e , a rma a ATTEST: grad Builor, D putt' ecretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planni-ng Commission of e City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify, that the foregoing Resolution duly and regularly introduced, passed,' and .adopted by the Planning Contel ' on of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a ularr meeting of the Punning Co "ssian held on the * day of *, ISB7, by the 617,dwing vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: lI NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: l F v 9 �3 h � 3 w �s Mr �i.;. y 'a t i i� its a' _s a ix is .,. w s it g y M ♦ 1 S. ±tltl � t4 r t V V5 E 6 Y r g_w s ra w � +I Ny y 31! yy.wvv •s s' y ` .d4 r�~ �M MVf ye y� yy i w. +ii WY Vy� KM i y µ n d _yQ i a 4 M V < w~r ,x a V O ° w N %r `erg M 4i YY v .v n a v A iki g S V J F •g f �u N¢a, COC^ C� O Vs 12 Y y� Y syp` 4 � k- 7 1 QQT Y p.` Ir. g a�s try Y: ■ r � I a 4 M V < w~r ,x a V O ° w N %r `erg M 4i YY v .v n all �Yw y� Y • Y� p44g e M �r a v A V J F •g f �u N¢a, COC^ C� O CC - C L Y y� Y syp` k- 7 all �Yw y� Y • Y� p44g e M �r Ul a v A s Y uVu y 's CC - 1 QQT Y p.` Y: ■ r � n Ul tom„ 0 Crry OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA L�!m N ME PARCEL MAP 107963 AP CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMoNjGA WmEmu NG DrvmoN i'i`M- PAR , 107 TM,L. TENTATIVE MAP 01 e �4 �1 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.10783 MASTER PLAN OF PARCEL 2 .AND SURROUNDING PROPERTIES f. I r24.5.0 I r24.5c 2a lwl 21100, '21 '32mo; ?w I, go 2zg ! rm 4— I I I k2l,750) klow (28.10D) 800) 1 Itimaon 123J ZS) 1 t 23.129 lt3900) --T — — — 1(25,0710 (xx,x)tx) AREA u4 SaJAREFEEr` CITY OF RANCHO CV10AMONdh ENGUMMMG DMWON k-10 Mm-ffiftfwL Mae Mtsl-f Tam MCMAL MASTEk RAN AML 0 DATE:, December 9, 1987 TO: Chairmn and Members.9fthe Planning Commissfon FkA Brad Buller, City-Planner BY*. Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRDMffAL ASIAS&%W LAND CONDITION& USE PERMIT 87-41 r PLT K. UISMUT - Me W-el5plent or 4 schoo st l p. SE WD EA acM, constUm of a 10,600 square f"� t adetnist-ation office, a X.e?!F -,square foot wareh-ujse building, and a 16,600 ' ""i�t - transportation/ maintenance building on 5.25 acres Of fa9d In the Low RL-41denttal Distket (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located on the east side of Beryl Street, sixth of 19th Street - AKI; 202-041-01 and 42. Asscw_,!,dtad With the development a Tree 'Removal Permit requesting the reoval of 3 mature trees. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION. A. AlCtion ReoMted: Approval of site plan, phasing plan, co"reptRaFffigr-affl—ng plan, concePizal landscape plan, elevations . for the a0ministration and warehous�,_, buildings, Tree Remoyll Permit, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Sur-Our%dinj Land Use and Zoning: North Cnurcn; Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) South Vacant; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling Units Per acre) East Single family residential under constructled; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West Single family residential and vacant; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) C. General Plan Dori nations: vrb3ecr _bl le - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) ?forth - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Low AesIdential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Lou (2-4 dwelling units per acrel,and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling unite per acre) ITEM L I PLANNING COWISSION. STAFF REPORT CUP 87-41 - ALTA LOMA SCHOOL DISTRICT December 9, 11987 Page 2 D. Site Characte., stics: The! northwest portion of the site is .pre n mprove W asphalt paving, a lbootleggedo portable building, and several portable storage receptacles. The remainder of the site Is vacant with an avaeage slope of roughly 2.5S frow northwest to southeast. There is an existing concrete flood control channel within a City e^sement that cuts diagonally through the northeast corner of thb'site. The site also contains several eucalyptus trees - two in the southwest corner along Beryl and others along the eastern side of the project area,:,, E. Parking Calculationq: Number of Number of Type Squam Parking spaces Space-,,� of Use !iqlne_ Ratio Req4ired Provi #.,d Phase I - Offite 1,321 1/250 5 io Warehouse 14,754 111000 is is Phase 2 - Mice 10,500 1/260 42 43 Warehouse 16,075 1/1000 16 28 39 7r Phase 3 - Office 10,500 1/250 42 43 Warehouse 3 1, 1/1000 32 32 Bus 13 F. Applicable Regulations: The Development Code conditionally pernizs public faUrTtres/utimies within the Low Residential District. Because there are no classrooms proposed, the project is not exempt from the City's review process and regulation; therefore, requires a Conditional Use Permit. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is proposing to develop a school 01st-rRT facility consisting of a"-10,500 square foot administration building, a 16,076 square foot warehouse building, and a 15,600 - square foot t.Aansportation"(Mintenance building. The development of the facility will be handled in ttree phases. The initial phase will 'consist of the construction of the warehouse building, a parking and loading is ' PLANNINQ C ISS10li STAFF REPORT CUP.,87 41 ALTA L%iA SCHOOL DISTRICT �. Ncerber 9, 1982 page 3 ar2a, the driveways out to Beryl, and a >spray booth. The wareirouss will accommodate a machir!2 iiA carpentrj tAop, bus maintenance area, and temporary office facilities. Immediately following the construction of the warehouse building, Phase 2 will commence witls. the developeent of the administration Office, the completion--of the parking lot, and the removal of the offices from the warehouse building. With ' the completion -of .Phase 2, all Improvements will be completed on the "extern two- th'._ „Ls of the site. At this point in time, pha;,,,3, the transportation / maintenance building is purely concep i There are no iEmediate plans to construct '-his building {de applicant does 'feel, however, that there may be a need._.,J;this building in the future if the school district was to unity with another uistrict. As a result, the applicant has provided the use as part of the r overall master-;,Ian for the site. The building elevation and floor plans have not been reviewed and would have to be approved prior to constructing. y i a B. Land "5e: fie aevelopseent Cade a #ablishea m list of uses that ! po nfT'"tr 7y !rave greater impacts on adjoining properties or I fimpGtsea G <)ndtionai cilse Permtisu recfe'ed eSS3rch is tthe cage with tRe school district facility. Tn considering the request, the° Planning Commission may want to consider the following plaints, both pro and con, in determining ether the proposed use is appropriate for this location: Pro 1. fie facility 1. 'ild not be located Alrectly adjacent to' any single family residences. There is a church located to the ,north. The flood ccntrol channel provides a physicij barrier batween the facility and the homes to the east. The vacant residentially zoned property to the south is owned by the School District and there are no plans to sell the land at this time. The warehousing and maintenance facilities are separated by several hundred feet and screened t the administraticn building from the homes across Beryl Street. 2. Bus and truck traffic will, access the site from 15th. Street (365 feet to the north) thereby eliminating adds ��' l heavy traffic down Beryl Street. Truck deliveries are estimated by the School District at two per week.'' ,�. 1 4 PLANNING COMISMON 51'AFP REPORT - ` COP 83 -41 - ALTA LORA SCHOOL DISTRICT December 9, 1987 Page 4 9. The closest structure, the church, typically operates at hours opposite whose of the School District. The District operates 8:00 a.m. to 5 :00 p.m., Monday thru" Friday while, the church's peak hours are on .Sunday.. 4. The warehouse building is setback approximately 212 feet back from Bcryl, 60 feet from the north perimeter, and 96 feet from the south perimeter in an attempt to minimize the impact on surrounding properties. Con I 1. The School District facility is proposing several uses that may not be appropriate within a residential area. The warehousing, machine and carpentrS, shops, paint booth and -bus maintenance are uses more tS?ically 'found within the industrial area of„ the City. The administrative office use -is generally I wAted within j commercial, office or industrial locations. 2. The facility will inc"se heavy vehicli traffic (i.e. buses, trucks) over what would normally be expected with residential dereiopment of the site. 3. If the School District did decide to sell off the property to e residential be located directly adjacent to thewarehouseifacilittyt 4. The warehouse building is a pre - engineered metal structure lacking in ar!bitectural treatment. 'Metal buildings &r. normally only allowed in the heavy industrial area. C. Design keview, Committee: The Design Review Committee T111aa ees eyT =°Emer e , Coleman) reviewed the proposal on November 19, 1987. At that time, the Committee felt that the Structures proposed were not appropriate for the following reasons: 1. .Administration Building - The long (f225 leet), linear,, design of the building was not compatible with, the residential area. the building should be redesigned in an alternative manner (i.e. "L" or "U" - shaped) to minimize the linear appearance. In addition, the building should Incorporate two story elements to provide some vertical elements in the building design to further minimize the linear features. The Committee also recommended greater relief on the Beryl Street elevation. a PLANNING C"ISSION STAFF CUP 87 -41 - ALTA LOMA SCHOOL- DISTRICT December 9, 1987 Page 5 Vsrehouse Building - The metal siding and roofing proposed were inappmoriate within a residential area. The building . should be redesigned to i'ncorport`te,,elements compatible with the residential area and to tie in with the administration building. Also, alternatives ,should be explored to try and minimize the height of tht warehouse building to reduce its impact from the surrounding areas. 3. A decorative block wall should be provided around the perimeter of the site to 9Fryen the warehouse /service area. 4. The driveways located at the north: and south ends of the administration building should be reduced to 30 feet in width and additional landscaping should be provided at'the ends of the building. 3. Additional tree wells and landscape fingers should be incorporated into the design of the parking area. A median strip between the parking stalls may be used instead of the .' tree wells. 6. Dense landscape buffer should be provided along the north and south boundaries. 7. A five foot landscape setback should be provided along the east boundary. 8. Perimeter black walls should be Constructed within the Phase 2 area and permanent irrigation and landscaping should be installed with the Beryl Street right -of -way if the administration building construction has not commenced by the time Phase 1 is completed. The School District stated that budget restrictions, imposed by -the state, have dictated the design of the project, in ptlrticuiar the metal warehouse. Ass,'a result of these concerns, the Desig Review Committee did 'not-recommend approval. Subsequently, the applicant submitted revised plans for further discussion. The administration building elevations and floor plan had been modified to provide greater movement of the building, particularly along Beryl. The warehouse building, however, was still being proposed with a metal shell. The Design Review Committee (Emerick, Tolstoy, Coleman) reviewed the plans on G- cember 3, 1987 and recommended approval of the design subject to the following conditions; L-J PLANNING COb'!'4ISS =ON STAFF REPORT CUP 87 -41 ALTA LOMA SCHOOL DISTRICT December 9, 1987 Page 6 1. ,Extensive landscaping ;.should "be p- ovided around the perimeter to screen thr warehouse buil;6g. 2. The roll -up door on the north side of the warehouse building mould be deleted. 3. The spray booth should be located further to the east ,Note: The revised plans were not available to be included with .he staff report. They will be available prior to the Planning Commission meeting. D. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed a pr-51FEt on Nov r 17, 1987 for compliance with City Standards. Eased on this review, the Committee felt that the project could be approved subject to the addition of several cc .';ions. Some of the conditions include: I. r enty -six foot drive aisles should be provided throughout the project to allow access for emergency vehicles. 2. The securvty gates should be equipped with knox boxes to AOL permit emergency entry to the site. 3. The existing utilities on the project side of Beryl Street sraould bee undergrounded, 4. Bus and truck , access to the site should only be permuted down from 19th Street (rather than up from Base Line). E. Tree Removal: Associated with the development, 'a Tree Removal Pemif necessary for the removal of three trees in order to construct the limprovemients on site. The two eucalyptus trees at the s�,uthwest corner of the project will be removed in order to install the entry driveway and one eucalyptus tree along the east boendary will be removed when the transportation/ maintenance building (Phase 3) is constructed. In keeping with the Tree Preservation ordinance, the removal of these trees will require replacement planting with '.he largest nursery- grown stock available as deter -fined by the Planning Commission or City Planner. F. Environmental Assessment: In completing the Environmental ChecK11st, staff has I en ified several areas that may impact properties in the area. These items, which were outlined in the Land Use section, 1rM ude the industrial type uses associated with the facility and the increased bus and truck traffic. With the exception of the paint booth, most of the industrial type uses, machine shop, carpentryy shop aad� bus maintenance, are contained with the warehouse bI Ming ?hereby E r. PLANNING COtMlISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 87 -41 -- ALTA LOMA SCHOOL DISTRICT December 9, 1#17 Page 7 l ducing ►wise (assuming,; doors /windows are closed). Nevertheless, ,adverse noise ?; *pacts could be generated. The paint booth could be located at the east portion of the site rather than the northern portion to provide a greater separation. , increase in bus and truck traffic can be mitigated b limiting the acces, to the site from 19th Street, By doing so, the °,buses and `trucks will have a minimal Impact on Beryl by traveling the 350 feet rather than the :3,500 feet down to Base Line Road. The automobile traffic generated will be insignificant when viewing the present and ultimate volume of Beryl Street. The a--tal building and proposed lard use would_ create an unattractive site incompatible with the residential neighborhood. M. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order for the Planning Commission to approve he pro ec , facts to support the following findings must be made: A. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan; the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the District in vc)ic1 the site is located. B. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfaiee, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. C. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. Iv. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in the Daily Rep2rt newspaper and public hearing notices were sent to aproper ies within 300 feet of the project site. Y. RECOMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission conduct a pub7i c hearing to receive all input and testimony on the proposal. If, after receiving all input, the Planning Commission feels that the design and land use proposed is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan and Development Code and the Planning Commission determines that the use will not have any significant environmental impacts, staff should be directed to prepare a Resolution of approval. Res full u tted, Bra uller City Planner r7 AtPOR\ cup E7 'ALTS, 1 - L,.S, DISTRICT D e s, see pa ge a Attachments-, EXhib4t "l" - Site utilization Exhibl, " " _ Site plan "CR . T _ Exhib - Phasing Plan ^' EX bit "b" - Conceptual Grading Uhl bit V - 841,1ding E4e" ions a- Exhibit "a" - Tree Eteaoyal kin G 4 f I5 q 9 gg .. .. 4 s v r O (D © !� © O U C+? O 0 p p (D �p 1} \ (D L�J t ; S tS JCS �.er �r� \ .�.n! V j ►_�._ M11 LOW. 4166 ow$r R Ot w_ IRWIcr 40" ` (D rte" tx, ^ ' , cr fill Wc G_7.�a a*tiks.aJaNMGI.. .ZG�Vii �►r -1 •• -' � Z044 Ni)F2'Tt t CITY A .N L-9 it J t CITY OF An .017-1V RANCHO CUCANIONGA T, -7 L E: .41V PLANNING DIVISM EXHIST-'--. SCALE.- 0 r L t-7 CITY (x -RANCM CLJCAV,[CN,,GA TITLE PLXNNM. D(V6M EXHIBIT-- SC-kLL.� CITY OF RANCHU CUCA,),IONG A Fl-&NNING DWSM 0 rmt. -A� Al-°W TITLET at'g-7- 0 EXHUNT.- e-Z SC.A.LE:-- 11 lu CITY OF jo RANCHO CLJ 'VVIONGA TtT1..E= PLANNING D(Nrl"T EXHIB[T= a SOLE L-/,3 T !-,:, 7 k. r i 3� EXHIFAT Ell DI DAT_: TO:. FROM: BY: SUBJECT: Y OF RANCHM CUCAMOIti sA STAFF REPORT ` a � o a z / 1977 DrcQmuer 9, 11-R87 Chairman1�4nd Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, C-i`y Planner Scott Murphy, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE 87 -16 - BON - A request to fncrease tne neignt of- an Spar men u ding from one story to two stories wifin 100 feet of adjoining single family- residences for a,1,0posed 20 unit apartment project on 1.16 acres of ),:.dhd in the Medium -High Residential District (14 -24 dwelling units per arre), located at the terminuses of Sierra Madre Avenue and Main Street -`APN 207 - 261 -2e. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIF':,_'1N: A. Action Requested: Approval of Variance and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning Northh — S.ngie amz ,y esiideenMal; Medium -High Residential (14-24 dweT?,ing units per acre) South - A.T. & S.F. Railroad East - Single Family Residential; Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) _ West - Condominium Project; Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) C. General Plan Designations: ro ec 2 — Medlum-Hign Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) North Medium -High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre),, South - Railroad East Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) West - Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) II. ANALYSIS: A. General. Over Ve past year, the applicant has submitted a num':e of;- rel imi nary plans for the development of a 20 yi► it A t 7�zo'M x ..a... PLANNING COMMISSION. STAFF REPORT VARIANCE 87 -16 - BON December 9, 1987 Page 2 apartment project on the 1.16 acre parcel. Through the various designs, the applicant hus been able to meet all but one development standard pertaining to the building height whin adjacent to single fL,hily zoned properties. The Development Code requires that multi - gamily pre acts within 100 feet of Low Residential zoning designations 'ire limited to one story, height. Therefore, t�,, applicant is now' requesting consideration of a proposal �o allow two story buildings within th,4t 100 foot setback area. At this time; the applicant is requesting consideration of a variance ap,?lication only. The precise site plan and elevations will have to go through the normal development review process and be approved prior;,to the issuance of any permits. In reviewing the variance request, the Planning Commission may wish to consider the following items; 1. There is an existing 10 foot watereasement along the east boundary and a 15 foot sewer easement along the south boundary: -- No permanent structures can be constructed within these areas. 2. With the relatively small size of the parcel, the 100 foot restriction for single story units encompasses approximately the eastern one -half of the site. 3. Sierra Vista Avenue will have to be extended down to the northwest corner of the site. From that point, a storm drain pipe will have to be installed . through the project in order to adequately drain the public street. The pipe may n -)t have to be located in the exact position shown on the plan but will have to be located in an area that is readily accessible for maintenance vehicles. The ideal location would be within a driveway. 4. The Code requirement limit'ng multi - family developments to one story in height within '_100 feat of the Low Residential Districts is intended, to provide a transitional area fr66 the single , family to the multi - family developments. S. The performance standards Gf the development rode discourage multi-family produot types directly adjacent to lower destsity single family residences. If, however, the two types are u M 11 El PLANNING COM'MISSTOM STAFF REPORT VARIANCE 87-16'-'BON SON Pecember 9, 1987 # ►'age 3 i< proposed adjacent to each other, all attachsd products adjacent to existing one story single ;.family developments shall be one story in order to provide greater, privacy 'for the single family residences and general compatibility. For the Planning Commission's information, there are three parc,Is of land located directly north of the project tAte, 7iwo of which are developed with single family residences, that ;ire Iocatf-'4 within the Medium -High Residential District, fiiese parce1•_ are also impacted by the 100 foot single story height limitation due to the Low Density Residential designations located to the east and to the north of the sites. As a result, the determination on this particular variance request may have`a bearing on future reyuv-ts i; this area. B. Environmental Assessme�nt: Staff has. completed ;the nvtron n al-'Z tc"TTIF —"and determined that the Variih ce request will not have any significant environmental impaci's. If the Planning Commission concurs, issuance of a Negati,ye Declaration would be appropriate if the project is approved, III. .FACTS FOR FINDINGS:. In order- for the Planning Commission to approve a va° a ce, the Development Code requires that the following 'rrny ^gs must be -,met 1. That the strict or` literal interpretation of erforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. _I I 2. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not generally apply to other properties in the same district. 3. That strict or literal interpretation of= the specified regulations would deprive the appli - ant of privileges enjoyed by owners of other properties in the same district. 4. That the granting of a variance will not constitute a c+ront of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation of other properties classified in this same district. 1 3 0 ,z PLAN NINE:%"ISSLON STAFF REPORT , VARIANCE 87 -16 - BON December 9, 1987 Page 4 5. That the granting of a variance will\�,not be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements it the vicinity. r IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Daily R ort newspaper as a public hearing, the property posted, anc no ces were sent to all property owne{s within 300 feet of them project site. I V. RECOMMEND¢„ ION: Staff recommends that the Planning Coz ssion conduct Yi7p—u5ric hearing to consider input and elements of this project. After receiving all information, the Planning Cr4mission has three options: S. The Planning Commission can direct staff to prepare a Resolution of Denial to be brought back to the Planning Commission for final action at the next Planning Commission meeting, or Z. The Planning Commission can direct staff to prepare a Resolution of Approval to be brought back to the Planning Commission for final action at the next Planning Commission meeting, or & The Planning can approve the variance in concept but delay final action until the precise site plans and elevations have completed the development review process. �i ly su tted CBityP er r BB:SM :te Att7chments: Exhibit "A" - Letter f+um Applicant Exhibit "B" - Location Map. Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Exhibit "D' - Site Utilization Map BON O ,UCTTON 1610 W.Holt Ave. "` i Co. Pomona, CA 91766 Matl( .9Ad$r „: (714) 629-6879 P- G.'Box 940 POIP:ia, CA 91789 November 2, i p S7 i To members of the Planning Commission and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, related file number P,R- 87 -06; Ladies and Gentlemen of the planning Commission: The purpose of this letter is to give a brief exple-iation as to why we are requesting a variance on property located at the intersection of Sierra Madre and Main Street. On February 12, 1987, we, Bon Construction received from the Planning and Engineering Departments a review of our preliminary plans under the Optional Development Standards of .`he City Developmjut Code, for a 24 unit apartment complex. Staff round the following: The land use Policies of the general plan support infield projects tin vacant resid- ential parcels, provided the density was not incompatat'?a to the surrounding`neig,iborhood character; moreover, the City Traffic Engineer showed concern about a hydrology problem that may arise from the water lowing from Sierra Madre north to south. Af.:er reviewing staff recommendations, we revised our plans and did the following: We revised the site to 20 units instead of the original 24, proposed to construct a temporary cul de sac on Main Street, and proposed to construct a new cul de sac on Sierra Madre with a storm drain to handle any water running off from Sierra Madre, and provide an easement for the storm drain through -ahe driveway to the south, to drain tAe water to a catch basin to the south. On April 29, 1987, engineering felt that their major concern had been dealt with, and we had provided what was needed as well as leaving the area of the driveway open on the west side in case the storm drain plugged up. On September 11, 1987, we received our third preliminary review back from the Planning Department, and staff had made a list of comments. After reviewing and revising their concerts, we were able to meet all of them except Ene. City code requires t }at the height of the buildings be Jim:ted to ote -story next to an LM zoning, and a two -story building must be 100 feet,�iway from property line. The constraints put on this land are the fola'cwing: To the north, we must construct a cul de sac into our property, to the south, a 15 foot easementfor sewet::iand storm drain right -of -way, to the east, a 10 foot easement for main water ping, and a temporary cul -de -sac, to the west, dowxl our main driveway other easement is required by the city for the storm drain pipe from Sierra Madre. Due` to the excessive r,=,,ti6r ot restrtigns placed this property, and our ability* to meet all. of 't ea hem e�aertt one, w respeatfczlly request from the Plan2n Comm s�siun a Qarian a of the 1Q0 foot setback required by the laity for a, •twG -story Multi-Unit building. It is extremely 'jiffiOUjt ttr uomgy with ell city regulations and codes, and still deal width the water rua� -aff from Siena A2adxe. The exiting topography pres$zatly flaws :ncra north to south an the west side of the prop" and we feel that ws :should not build wliere the water is now "flortirig, as it, could cres*e a bigger problem a. in the future. Any further work to be `Zone on this property now dep�tds on yc(ur \ decision to request this veviaace. Sirir - � f Peter Bon , BoA Construction C4 i'- Ip , InIFT �s r I - I` *T1 I RA. CHO s� 4 V 1 N {�ItY4 y wi+l now 1/4 i F I ' 1 i V / I �'P[11Ny6P Y•o LiJ i_-�fl - <_ 5!' ..1'.O •A 1l.,F ♦�It d� N „�I..t -Ra :wl _ ._.._ eS.�i PROFt}sro 4-'7'� 1 1 i � ilef{ L 4flilv�� .*4t4 1 Mai }i S' ;.eY i, rwr.. �r4 aW. 43° U2 ve.,ct T W iO� a ""Maur 6-V i.x �V.o ~,ifwr �J ..w n+rISr l+SL NX)RTl RANCHO CUCA.Nio PLA,' NING EXv6�CJli; r EXHI IT= SCALE fn— @ -9) Ina 47 54 60 *f Q 40 @ 44 51 w 4s at Sit s 46 53 ------------ F AL Pdr. Lot 29 0 Pat. Lot 29 CITY CF PLAMIW, "V WN,') fn C3, 13 IS MUM 847 @46 @45 3W' 00, @ -9) Ina 47 54 60 *f Q 40 @ 44 51 w 4s at Sit s 46 53 ------------ F AL Pdr. Lot 29 0 Pat. Lot 29 CITY CF PLAMIW, "V WN,') fn C3, 13 IS MUM 847 @46 @45 MAIN - :aw - Sara .018 Ofs (Di7 .10to Ow 040 (sw M-2; Ll CITY OF RANCF i - CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT'' r o DATE' December 9, 1987 v a TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, -ity Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12820 - residential su vision o 16 ',g -iee—Ta-117 o s on 4.17 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2.4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southeast corner of Highland Avenue and Jasper Street - APN: 201- 241-10. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approll of subdivision design., conceptual grading pan, and issuance of a Negative Declarattori. B. Project Density: 3.84 dwelling units per acre C. Surroundin Land Use and Zoning: North Family esi- dential; Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) South - tacant and futun�, Foothill Freeway; Low Residential (2 -4 del l i ng do is per acre) East - Vacant; Low Residential (2 -4 dweiling units per acre) West - Yacan'; ;xw Residential ;(2 -4 dwei9ing u ';s p.:r acre) D. General n3an Designations: Project Site ="(:ow Kesidential (2 -4 dwellings units per acre),.,. North - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) South - Freeway East - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling unitBg per acre) West - Low Residential (2 -A dwelling units per acre) E. Site Characteristics: The site is c:urrently.vacan-t w1th an average slope o 1 from north to south. The project is bounded oh the north by Highland Avenue and on the south by the future Foothill Freeway. II. ANALYSIS:' Background: Tentative Tract 12820 was originally approved by e ann ng Commission on November 14, 1984. The previous submittal consisted of 16 lots with access off of two cul -de- sacs. Jasper Street was proposed as a half - street with four lots fronting onto it. The second sbrb~et was proposed as an L- shaped cul -de -sac with 12 lots fronting onto it. ITEM N PLANNING COWISSION STAFF REPORT .ENTATIVE TRACT 1,2820 - K088INS December 9, 1997 .Page 2 General.- B. General: The applicant is proposing to redesign the tract to provide L- ;;hayed street serving all 16 lots. The street will provide_ a connection to the property to the east. The lots within the tract range in size from 8,103 square feet to 10,790 square feet in area. The average lot size ie 9,311 square feet in area. No dwelling units are being proposed at this time. j C. Desi n Review Committee: The Design Review Committee a es ey, Ric ie , Buller) reviewed the proposal on August 20, ' - 1987. At that time, the Committee recommended the fallowing conditions be Lttached to the project: 1. Decorative block wails should be pravided along ;ighland Avenue and along all corner side yards. 2. Landscaping sNWI d be; provided between the sidewalk and the wall along all corner- .!�!.'=cjaras. 3. The driveways for lots 1 and 16 should be located on the east side of the lots. In addition, much discussion during the meeting focused on the wall along the south tract boundary recommended by the acoustical engineer to mitigate the potential noise i4p'tcts � from the foothill Freeway. The acoustic;-,-, analysis indicated that a 14 foot high wall (as measured fr(m the building pad elevation) would be necessary at the west end of +he site stepping down to 12 feet a. the east end of Vie site. The Committee expressed concern over the impact that a wall of this size would have on the future residents. The Committee also expressed concern aoout the aesthetics of the wall as viewW from Carnelian Street and the freeway. In addition to the 12 to 14 foot high sound wall, a retaining wall Is proposed along the nOth tract boundary. The necessity of the retaining wall stdm from the insufficient distance between the future freeway and the tract boundary, Creating a retaining wall ranging from 411 to E fe;t in height. This, in combination wM, the sound wall, results in an overall wall height of between 14 and feet. the impact is farther .18 compounded by the freeway beissr depressed in this area. Due to the significant height of the proposed wall, the Design Review Committee made the following recommendations: A profile of the wall should be provi4imo for Design Review �$ Committee review. �' I PLANfiiIN6 CBP +taSSFi it 5UFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 1r%ZSQ - KOBBINS December 9, 1987 Page 3 2. A design for the wall should be submitted for Design Review Committee review prior to the Planning Commission meeting. The design should include the type of material, color, retained planter boxes, vertical landscaping materials, and /or„ othaw features necessary to mitigate the impact of the wail from both 'the north and the south views. CalTran..,shoulO be contacted to Pxplore the possibility of installing landscaping :within the freeway right -of -way. The Design Review Committee subsequently rev"awed the Mall design and recomr coded approval st;,iect to 4; wall being stucco with a fluted spit face cap.; D. " Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee re ewe �, proposal on August 1,5, 1987 and identified two areas of thq tract that are not in compliance with City Standards an&,,,Policies - flood protection along Jasper Street and secondary;, emergency access. The first issue, flood protect : ln, is ;,necessary because lo#s 1, 2, 16 an" 1 fall within "a Flood tone A. City Ordinoce requires the building .,d elevations to be ons __,foot atr 1-the flood level. As a esult, a flood >tudy is required to determine the flood level and the corresponding building ptd elevatiin. The grading plan must be revised to reflect rho 'rsctasary floo.1 protection, Raising the house pads would tr�w necessitute increasing the noise attenuation wall heimhr, The requirement for seceadary emergency access is m,cessary !)ecause of the long dead -ene -street. When the parcel to the east develops, the se -,on:,ary a,less will t•e provided. Fn 'tke int:rim, however, the 700't dead -end street exceeds the City and Foothill Fire District maxi" of 600 f=et. Therefore, a tw9orrry rcress will have to be across lot 8 or across the adxaceRr property by obtaining the necessary easement. With these two sterns being addr_ssedi and other conditions of approv, the Technical Review Committee determined that the tract ^is in compliance with applicable City Standards and Policies. E. Environmental Assessment: Thp, applicant has completed Part I of e Initial Study.— Staff has completed Part 2 and idwntifed two areas of potential adverse impacts -- noise and flooding. Due tM the proximity ni the site to the future Foothill Freeway, tree tract will be exposed to noise levels in excess of City Standards. An acoustical analysis. has been submitted to address possible mitigation measures to reduce the noise to a level of a less than sigrificarit infat, *t. Based on the rc;commendations of the ranort a sound *ztll along the south tract boundary ranging in height frac� 14 feet (as measured from At -3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT 4 J TENTATIVE TRACT 12820 - KOBBINS December 9, _ 1987 Page 4 0 the building pad. a be necessary to the feet at the r # „ re u othe noise level below 65 City This pbvtion of'Jasper Street is an 'area that is susceptible to flooding and has been identified as a Flood Zone A., In artier - ! to reduce the flooding to w-1 -qss than significant for the taut., the building pads for trots 1, 2, 13 and '&-must be Ij el-evat44 one foot abuve the flood level. A flood study has been sabmittcd to determine the flood lew" and the correspond rg building pad elevations for lots 1, 2, 15 and 16 have been identified. With ttr: inclusier, of the recoLmnduttins of the acoustical analysis and the flood study, staff finds; that the project, together with the conditions of approval, will not have a significant impart on the envir,.-;itcsent. if the Planning Cone.ssion concurs, issuance of a Negative Declaration world be aparopriata. III. FACTS FOR FILINGS: The project is consistent with the General TTan - 350 the Bevielooent Coda. The project, with the added mitigati n measures, will not be detrimental t,o, the public health or safety, or cause nuisances or significant adverse environmental impacts. Ic addition, the proposed use and site plan, together with the re:. ended con.diticas'of approval, are in compliance with the applica0p provisions Wf the Developaent Code and City Standards. - IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This ;ten has been advertised e -. The Daily Report newspaper as a public hearing and notices have bean sen� ";o aTl" property owners within.300 feet of _#t ,'site. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Plannina Cormission approve Tentative Tract 12820 through adoption of Mahe attached Resolution with conditions and issue 4 Negative Dec:aration. RespvA,ful ly _ubmitted, f %Brad 2ey" City ( BB:SM:vc Attachments: Exhibit "A� - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Subdivision Map EAHhi . "C" - Grading. Kan Exhibit "D" - LSa ster Plan Pdsalutien of;Approval Wh Conditions d y, ITUC9 NO 3zz I(M -f. 13311: n y � �� _ a F syw +absa � t � � •� � i w $l s. i s � _ J�..�.r. 4 • r •.L. :.i Sit ta tj i e a _ an 4 ry ff ii iTESI: ,! Z S b6,.7 R.' NalO CUCA.,NIG �A T I?`[.F 'L.a.'titil �`C DItTiSK') EXHINT= SCALL �, o • i ], qpr- .... jAl 1 MAI 1 v � 1 � _ .,f[ = au ,r. ... • ,u 2 -itt "�u-�� - .F+>t : '� I�1• `=.7 1d:3 ^� LOLL• -•-`� -_ .-,... 1� .�i� f. ,. .. _,,... jam-- 1 it k,,_*_ •-a.04 # :�� --�-� ; � �� _ • -jam -�, ,. � � j ?i I c!t =au t1 yQ : " +gymy`s' t Ju!t -ice L -JWV so r Z � 1 1 ;l -Nk ktTi CIT'll" TITLE' PLACNNING, Djt`1S EXHIINT 7 0 ,ate i I • �j •0� •.ill +— 'Li CITY CF ITEM: /9�tv — t tI t ! ! t t t t t i { 1 It t •- t RANCHO CLIakN NCA TITLE:�' S �b' k IBS i alt ��r E • �j •0� •.ill +— 'Li CITY CF ITEM: /9�tv — t tI t ! ! t t t t t i { 1 It t •- t RANCHO CLIakN NCA TITLE:�' v(' N �k,� r ji A Y x'.;11 � � -+• 1 .. z3: �i CITY Or -;.E EXHIHI:i�Z- SCALU I *Tl CITY(f PUNNING RANCHO c GA TITLE. DIN'LSPON' EXHMT- SCALL ff to K: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC.AMONGA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP Nk: 12820 LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST COR►iE€t OF HIGHLAND AVENUE AD JASPER 'STREET IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT - APN: r 201- 214-10 A. Recitals. (i) Carl Kobbins has filed an application for the approvai s Tentative Tract Map No. 12820 as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application". (ii) On the 1.1thpf September, 1987, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga c,reducted a duly notired public hearing on the application and concluded': said hearing on that date. - (iii) All legal -prerequisites to the asaption of this Resolutic %n P have occurred. S. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and res;:i rl by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically firds that alb of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and nprrect. 2. Based upon substantial evidence prc�ented to this Commission during the above- referenced public !gearing on September 9, 1987, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property '•_^ated at the southeast corner of Highland Avenue and Jaiper Street with a street frontage uT 579 feet and lct depth of 305 feet and is presently vacant; and (b) The property to the north, south, east and west arp zoned for residentidi uses. The property to the north is developed with single far,ily residences end the property to the south, east _nd west awe currently vacant. The property to the south is the future Foothill Frdeway. (c) The project, with the recommended conditions of approval, complies with' a'.1 minimum :ievelopmtent standards of the City of 'Rancho Cucamonga; and' (d) The development of 15 O ngle family,lots on -t.17 acres of land is consistent with the tow Residential land use designation of the Genera. Plan. f Af- (1 PLANNING COWISSION RESOLUTION NO. Tentative Tract 12820 - Kobbins December 9, 1987 Page 2 3, UZ ed upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specifi.-- findings of facts set forth irf paragraph I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and conclu�es as fol;ows: (a) That tentative tract is consistent with the General ,Plan;,, Development Zaa"G, and specific plans; and (b) The design and improve�ents t'f the tentative react is consistent with tine General Plan, 6eveloprment Code, and specific plans, and {c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and (di The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injurl to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and (e) The tentative tract is not ME , to cause serious public health problems; and (f) Tho design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement 'acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that, the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and,, further, this Commission hereby issues a legative Declaratioo. 5. Eased upon the findings and concl'usio�s set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Ctmmission hereby approvers the application subject, to each and every condition set forth below and; in the attached Standard Conditions attached heret; and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division: (a) Decor °ative blcek walls shall be required along Highland Avenue: and all corner side yards. The location and desican of the wafts shall be shown on the -final landscape p'an which is subject to review and approval by the City Planrer pr •sri_to the issuance of building permits. (b) Landscaping shall'! be required between the sidewalk and the wall cn all corner side yardr5.. The final landscape plans shall be reviewed and appt�jved by the city Planner prior to the` "issuance of 5uild;-ng aervil's. PLANNING COWISSION RESOLUTION NO. Tentative TrPCt 12820 - Xobbins December 9, 1§87 � Fad \3 4 (c) The driv.,.vays for lots I and 16 shall be l ocate�- On the east side of the lots. The site plan shall be reviewed and approved by the €. City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. (d) A sound wall, as required by the acoustical analysis, sh471 be installed along the south tract boundary. The wall shall be stucco with a fluted split face block cap. The final design of the wall shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee prior to recordatic, ;4f the final asap: - (e)° A final acoustical analysis shall be required to, idenVfy necessary mitigation measures to reduce the noise level within the residences bolow 45 CNEL. The repovt shad be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. Engineering Division: (a) Highland Avenue shall )e constructel full width from Jasper Street to Car. *11an Stratt, exc�jpt that off -site sidewalks and 6 rkway Thnd's aoong q{ay be def /;rred until development of the adjacent property. Tte developer will be eligible to enter into a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of off -site street improvements from future develp.oments. (b) Jasper Street shall be constructed full width from Highland Avenue to the tract's southerly pt js1°ty boundary except that off -site sidewalk and pa,-%way landscaping may be deferred until - development of the adjacent property,, The developJr will be " ible to enter into a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of street improvements beyond the required 26' minimum street pavement width from future developments. (c) A storm drain system shall be constructed in the existing drainage easement to Carnelian ;;breet to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. (d) A permit will be required from MWD fa, any work within their right -of -way. 6. The Deputy Secvetar to t1 ,)is 6t*Jssion shall cekify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE 'CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY!, Larry T. McNiel, chairman ATTEST: ra u I I e'', ep. y ecre ,Y7W f3 K � d PURIM W S{SM ibESUT°I w No. Tentative Tract lE 2 - Kobb'n5 December 9, 19$7 „ PAge 4 r,J r' I, Brad Butler, ��eputy 1^j, of,the planning Commission of the City' of Rancho Cucamonga, do her6yy c66 tify that the foregoiiig Resolu�;ton was duly and regularly introduced,, passed, and adapted by the Pl„!�a'ing Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regvl,*,• meeting o. th4 Planning Commission held an ti, 9th day of Wember, 1987; by the following vote -to-wit: *. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: CfAISSIONERS: ABSENT: CGMISSIOKRS: 1 j a Q- - 13 tax iF a j! P" I -I-bm .S 9.51 at,! M pr .23L x j t a I 'k s -5 .Ti TL r: -1 - . tv I �-a tz O= ."; G Sw , -1-2 .S C 1st E - sgsj 37 33 lb L .c - A W. V! ;� I$,:-2 2>aarmn ;i ' 1 1w■1 Z11YY�p1V3``iz % a �N lux Te +7 � Y Cy N^ fiVl�� _mow asCy04 o M ■.Y6�M 117-P! q a�C Or-, -pre �'-�Y pg yyMg 'y u�M rM�NNA b°•i•°�r y�I�Y����40 �Q6� 7 m�c w� �✓�M �YN ��' �� ■pC' gVV�ei��J�"`h�.iSyG iMl4 »gy Jy KI flNyNy C ■�+6� �,NUYC ��nn yY NM M�tiiY� O4 {J{II LY 6 jf ■X�'•�i � y�y ° I _11x. o �d1q�BigZ, L f d Z.: �.-as �� Zis 102, P � Ca C �^ u •� till ! y N =111$ IN r- 1t�TS■ � � i 0� YLi AM, V Y VIE W V C _mow y� r r »gy A x tl .iii$y � Z!'� i. t 'T�V N'r y ^.� LyMt 7 dG J 1C ii YY %_ �r 0,13 V •• N O NC YppCMMV Is 7 =i► It gyY� sti �rs ty mn. Y Y C N O,C° Y Q-c L Yw �a�� y3M�in AMS p YV4 KO O Yr ♦ � N i M � a�Q �fO� cqp�ol -�p� �Y^ > N• .ir L L L L i:�Y NC A }..Ciwi CL �l r. I 3 a! =i V w 11 E Xoio �a :_�` �g au �pLO COL # "o`y"a.ap et gl� LO «.. ry pI M�n1S 4N w 6upf ,�a POe.b3u;Ofya c�i y9vr f'. a �1 �O ciao iQ 1 M Y�1 yC iu.�O C MM. MAN CKS ✓. Q'M yl�. at �A 4lR pK�yy ^L� -�1 lolir7� '•j'Ng Y °O apaR + ^^. Yy p1����ONOMY �V _� {Y�tMi � V4ap�.C� .. NVgL �w•^ � ::.R 4t �L 6��p �V��•�N� Y�� ^O +. �V�T A tog"C pO1' � �y 1rt•S� NG �' ^� N� 3,. "i_��G •Kf �.ry.�Y (��i �?R'�IyM�{`�° ■YMT wQ� ~ 1 L "w rU J'"L S�4^ndN UNL' N •O.M `� �g�iitlqppnn ���+ o^ .g{'�,�,g' w V4�'•Y '='t Y�� N IG/i YS,1.•pp}a`u,..ny N L ONL DIY �M NyL N, .^ YCp4�C.L1O�O.�vi q�a � V Y� A{E• y� N� N. Y N � •r N E N O H N� t N V ^ ^� Y. �� NO 6 �Y,: �+ Yg •a M a M >t: u ti > n< 1 ° 4 d N« 7 L' > O L A �v V > aF p � t• C C Y � Y T Ox v� q ^ 4 ^� s MQ NC 4 s M G i 65; L � N x fir'^ C tYNC u C G L ^ L c n„ 4�Y M YV^ 7 Cp� P�2y w y L � I � j - ^ rift .•sI � �g Yea pva ■� � AN R �, v iaEg *1 °Cw `"w$Y: °.� 24 s `•p+C V ws Coo N�w��1 r�, DIY aci.�n CQ1 N °`•a~w is °O ^�MV +� w ua■a L Cw�pb Y CC LY v ±q� V~ C N N r ,w.,,, p K�.11 aV C E.,, ��L•� p) gy w N H N' J W u • 01 i wM�pwp Q+ � C1 V �O ti. �tti� •Li 9vt ��• O SN . j V x V �N �u V ^ rift .•sI � �g Yea pva ■� � AN R �, •„2 iaEg *1 °Cw `"w$Y: _` pdw IL s `•p+C V ws Coo N�w��1 r�, DIY aci.�n CQ1 N °`•a~w is °O ^�MV OlQy. Iw ^a■ !.ICY N70'Q��^yJ•J Su y`i.ri N N r ,w.,,, p K�.11 _ a n o it L "��Y ?CIS K0 I r R ra 4C�at W•+ V�nw �MiYp. � w N H N' J W Ci 07011 -02 o 12 -9 --87 PG A ende o A S y{ C. M VY Y> = j� Y L N +N4.SL ' a Y d1 V Y �Vyw jN �4 tlyryM C ON a+n "" .— W a goo 3 �L LC NYC Ga+•wY m R!� 3, it tl« N Y iL �WT 0. pA..��o.. a. 1i C G a M OI LK 3 i C l a .wNi Y c>� aff wig Y ASM > xx i MiO YQ.4 tytYF1 G ba�.i:�� tN� poY t tl N Can. Y{{ C 4 pN Ate' A C t � N e�pp ,� 7YCC i IVES .0 w Y S b.93 N y p L.0 "• �.rii+ o pa L Y Z T S S c _ Y NTp MCp v a L iO uCi ,.wagCN L°';a. ^ rS VJ1 ' Y V xCC6 � Yp OY4N.r w 6 M V�yY 9f N Q6NN +N. `L y W m ^ a'Crt 'V C, Y Oas OG O s ` AY a w. y ptlA�C _C T6C O gNVCC ^• " r C cZQe. C ^""aM 01 wVM lO-O +tl+ Ol 9w OC6 Y �CY LV1. N Y\ ,i�L u ^ � V..Yy W... H W:G all vl .0.. ia.s L �.. 6 L Y 46 d C �� M 5.. L �— a ate+. tl.- <o.� jYCS a. L� sa L N N A� L IC 1.Y1 °xa D O ^ x �y } 4 C jd ^3 6 9-0 f�_CM CV wa L'� Ewa C Y Y E., .. g YY M COQ yL��$ Vpp a+ a� �� C YtlL.Nc Nu Qa w N a � 4OC ai+Y a+Y`L T� „771G ON4L Laa a+V Nil' M N s e eNx G G�J% Y Y(�GL t tpI yN i M R R�r 5 uT Y YyCC 5Y5 yy°� u ONY � �KO V V� alw = =Y. CVV A A3 i i Ltl�O C 45C 7 7itl uzY. y yCZ, V VYL' e eyya vp Z Z�y s sLL qca N Na o oa wr[ <� " N F A C^ T T S T C C L L - -' , pS y L�p({��ppyyc L Ln CCO. � �I:- E �io. y{ C. M VY Y> = j� Y L N +N4.SL ' a Y d1 V Y �Vyw jN �4 tlyryM C ON a+n "" .— W a goo 3 �L LC NYC Ga+•wY m R!� 3, it tl« N Y iL �WT 0. pA..��o.. a. 1i C G a M OI LK 3 i C l a .wNi Y c>� aff wig Y ASM > xx i MiO YQ.4 tytYF1 G ba�.i:�� tN� poY t tl N Can. Y{{ C 4 pN Ate' A C t � N e�pp ,� 7YCC i IVES .0 w Y S b.93 N y p L.0 "• �.rii+ o pa L Y Z T S S c _ Y NTp MCp v a L iO uCi ,.wagCN L°';a. ^ rS VJ1 ' Y V xCC6 � Yp OY4N.r w 6 M V�yY 9f N Q6NN +N. `L y W m ^ a'Crt 'V C, Y Oas OG O s ` AY a w. y ptlA�C _C T6C O gNVCC ^• " r C cZQe. C ^""aM 01 wVM lO-O +tl+ Ol 9w OC6 Y �CY LV1. N Y\ ,i�L u ^ � V..Yy W... H W:G all vl .0.. ia.s L �.. 6 L Y 46 d C �� M 5.. L �— a ate+. tl.- <o.� jYCS a. L� sa L N N A� L IC 1.Y1 °xa D O ^ x �y } 4 C jd ^3 6 9-0 f�_CM CV wa L'� Ewa C Y Y E., .. g YY M COQ yL��$ Vpp a+ a� �� C YtlL.Nc Nu Qa w N a � 4OC ai+Y a+Y`L T� „771G ON4L Laa a+V Nil' M N MiO YQ.4 tytYF1 G ba�.i:�� tN� poY t tl N Can. Y{{ C 4 pN Ate' A C t � N e�pp ,� 7YCC i IVES .0 w Y S b.93 N y p L.0 "• �.rii+ o pa L Y Z T S S c _ Y NTp MCp v a L iO uCi ,.wagCN L°';a. ^ rS VJ1 ' Y V xCC6 � Yp OY4N.r w 6 M V�yY 9f N Q6NN +N. `L y W m ^ a'Crt 'V C, Y Oas OG O s ` AY a w. y ptlA�C _C T6C O gNVCC ^• " r C cZQe. C ^""aM 01 wVM lO-O +tl+ Ol 9w OC6 Y �CY LV1. N Y\ ,i�L u ^ � V..Yy W... H W:G all vl .0.. ia.s L �.. 6 L Y 46 d C �� M 5.. L �— a ate+. tl.- <o.� jYCS a. L� sa L N N A� L IC 1.Y1 °xa D O ^ x �y } 4 C jd ^3 6 9-0 f�_CM CV wa L'� Ewa C Y Y E., .. g YY M COQ yL��$ Vpp a+ a� �� C YtlL.Nc Nu Qa w N a � 4OC ai+Y a+Y`L T� „771G ON4L Laa a+V Nil' M N jYCS a. L� sa L N N A� L IC 1.Y1 °xa D O ^ x �y } 4 C jd ^3 6 9-0 f�_CM CV wa L'� Ewa C Y Y E., .. g YY M COQ yL��$ Vpp a+ a� �� C YtlL.Nc Nu Qa w N a � 4OC ai+Y a+Y`L T� „771G ON4L Laa a+V Nil' M N Leo �c���atl+rN�. �°'•� arV3 z w ti u.o °�'� °a �� MG.YV '4.R TYY. Y �w LLL LAO�g� � Yea �. qY yy �M L�Nb L `J 3.yRg0 pp 4 O Q� .• � A=� CG} r 4i�� .�.. � y M� W �v G� K *�r,g fK�`�a. W ii P4+Y+n� ALy v �( +e0.> ArO Vc L N Y L 4 6 A L y ad Y s jsr W�O� ~' � ~~ � ��'Y N S a �y L NO2.4m yy gffl cw SN i !V aN It OV as ]�{ 2C e�VbS� �p u � �� M � ■. Y M M p 0 4. �� t srr: � YC O i, yy Yn ~wiI~ p rye NW CiVI {. NA01 Nr�Op G. kz y �M04 C V pG iW CC G.r YyY N o pN pV. LYL ^C y N p•TY� yY/ C ha vC +isn `.r rCC7 C'1 rte. } tNL N M M O w YU{� oYLu}1 RAY IL r..��,.�gt M V LU ��... V O B •+ . V �. r�:�v Y.. " �w !" q �u�°a m� ui. V '� ; Ko YO �O5 _O Diu Y a M .e ui bIt r I: t liJ Y y i N Casa =' it! QA M .. eOC' ..$P¢ O °AAg OIYaIL ~• A C �y C�.�? Y Y�P�•N� �i4K;y JL Yw Cj ONY 43 MC yyVD P Cay ,C r i,p •�V nl+ ,y nRL Stir •ri��: ■■: aw a, La il�we •i ,� dLS i.b,o aV N 6 r r~ G Y G p O W G F. q U 6° {� -clot N M M V i Q y y p R 4 4 '' i C. R w O y ♦ C w .� -C 91 t b ya y. n. T 1f+stf C.C. a 1Ey� V� L 4 O,. RaY +•fy ``� Nle �{�� C0Mi1 AY 6�4m �L ppit1 YY r Y yM0 L.V N�OML 6 Y CO •4 M OLVW p,9Y yr V McGb� a4 HMO N� N G.+L.rOi� GONwsN. vY1 V= Yp "gCV q0 }''°G L.�. 4 ,� G9$ILIA #soy �Mr~.G. a$Y�'v�`_ va`a3 G �9 N 9.r. C 4�j' yL 4q w4 OY i}�}��iyy O rY .�+uYaaYi Vq p ■Y,�� VQ Gg}'N. YCwp 't'Ol. L» G Y NN N LLi p,� w V Y Lo �N. � tV. U.S C f� N -Z,3 �». �` p■■ G4 44C DY.ut K LCCw� u ,� �V a_ 4N NC OC.+Z ►L Cy a'9 91. V As AR_+ Ss LL GM (p1Y LU 1�NN r5 WNOO WV t:J�4. `M i. /JW RG7 601Y rw w[ - a u W -1 woou Na°i N G 4 L W L r O N O M N H Q C Q ■G, C �.�G e� Art CS o LL 4 Y� N iA $ C s IMS S Y N er acqq«Q �Ll NYC °�1 >^ gas �< b. NY 0'yi.«. C 4- YNO 8 GN 33 y�YO Ny �MCA w.A •L_y,`AO Y ^ski nb 6y6 Z 6 « LS «4. : O O v�T qay «V M o(� °rte o� yyb�o ja °� 9 `�Nit 8 Am n uu�^ �w y\V «r LCY > Cr pp CIY y 8.0 y�+L _4L �b ��.y" a � NC- Yr �L Rio 7riW viv �wY. .r7 «j s� !Zr Nr rz; ' civ Y N o� M y Yet i� V V O L s� r w Y w +� v x� u C ^ ca N« Y S O O =OS Y K 4 Y «� s �r c M tLi Y v M vi L w� 6 N 4 w« a> q ^o S� 3. rL F M M 6 .1l 44F N N Lr W L C N L yY W i L Y « y r A O/Y L 4 CL'M CCS yy. A 9pY N p 9� � LOy. 0.Cw �TC �Y YfiY 1i ly C Y'• O 4 M S « 11 O 9�it -t mil. CY. N a vv O O C C V c 7 A 4 L Lt « � N 1•f N J A(- In q0 yL ML�OL N j NNc �Y C yY O GU gab 2- .. L V� y ma > tot ppE E ENE o p } CyLig� �' c�c a 4u gCa LEO O V 6A C C V� Oxtltl. �eti � T Y^ «cCp Y y C99D. Me pf GO s'gytl v u y$C[yY {� 6 ^C�� XQ. Oi° b «~ )gam q0 yL ML�OL N �Y C A✓ At OIV tY. a+= GU L V� y sssl��� > tot ppE a 4u gCa LEO L M. C C T1 O O^ T Y^ A ��Jt}.`` ¢ N Y y C99D. Me pf GO s'gytl v u y$C[yY {� 6 ^C�� XQ. Oi° b «~ )gam V ° ®.O Eq d La YyYO wa�L C� I,ll ifN IM U t Q a 6i L-1 «, �o LY V G� U H. ,p O Yp,� yylY L C n G � C L 01 a ti ° vY C W 4 7 Ge `M W C L ^ 44 Ls d C Y Y^ 7�LT L 36. rQ Cr YeC q L A 41�7y A ��,. L�f n 11• ytlY ygN 4 tltl O ^ w..1 a ip� LL` Y�/ N nu 2r •s°�' .YG S[OM i 9e L o «a- �s ,p L ^u `v,,, s L C q > M p + q u aaa aL�i Y 8 Rb vY C W 4 7 Ge `M C ~ C L ^ 44 W� W� ~ V y y YeC q L A 41�7y qp 4 tltl O � N � •• Y Y pp L 2QCL C .all L id La a� �pp� p�■ N Ly Y ^� c+yLl L � y ^� ;L V LLi j O°0.0 gyVJ3 p� 3C C G UN •1 V N01 L^ °g y.xr tlYid � -re 151 Y q CN.L vaiyrt �� @I iM Y Ni* cY Y■■f ((t// i <N ir. riW .;? Z V E- ,p N G G L C q > M p + W . U39 Ge `M 41+ C W� Y�f J'sn C A� C O+NF bs 4 tltl O � N � •• Y Y pp L 2QCL C .all L id La UN •� O�'00 C L p�■ N Ly Y 7 � s A � HIJ y{1JD � DT CJs M V� 1QQA1Aru emu• M,y 4op1NiC „�, ` N •11 Ntt i fAJy� p .;? Z V E- ar, Lq�l 4 0 H L C q > M p + W . U39 Ge `M 41+ C W� Y�f J'sn C A� C O+NF bs 6N6 i`f► «� M« Q Y Y pp L 2QCL C N CY ABCV � `J �6 O�'00 C L p�■ N Ly Y V � N Y q.•VN. y{1JD ~NC ^G Y M 1QQA1Aru emu• M,y 4op1NiC Y7s 06'. I � j hgsgyi.�� rT,. 7rgPae�£da j. SITE DESCRIPTION: 3� A., Action peg2ested: Approval d_ he subdivision maps conceptual -- , CITY' OF RANCHO CiTCAMOINTGA p"Tat plan, conceptual grading plan, conceptual landscape plan STAFF, REPOW and building elevations and issuance of a =Negative Declaratiow. B. Project [tensity 6.68 dwelling units per acre. C. Surroundin Land Use and Zoning: � or r a. - Vacant; Terra Vista Planned Community a. Past v West DATE: December 9 19$'i� D. General D TO a Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM:, Brad:Suiler, City Planner P" Debra Meier, Associate P!�nner SUUECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASf�E:�S�iET AND TENTATIVE TRACT 133 03 - LEWIS HOPES re er,_T__ uU �2'V l gs a an rev err a s ng h -f0ily l on 13.98 acres of land in the T0�'�a Vista Planned'Community designated Law - tedium Density (4=5 dwelling units par acre) located at the southwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain View Drivo - "APR 221 - 1661 -13 ant ,x4; I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A., Action peg2ested: Approval d_ he subdivision maps conceptual p"Tat plan, conceptual grading plan, conceptual landscape plan and building elevations and issuance of a =Negative Declaratiow. B. Project [tensity 6.68 dwelling units per acre. C. Surroundin Land Use and Zoning: or - scan ; erra a anned Community South - Vacant; Terra Vista Planned Community Past - Vacant; Terra Vista Planned Community West - Vacant; Terra Vista Planned Community D. General Alan Designations-. ` ro ecT Site - oa- eeO u Density Residential (4 -8 duelling units per acre) North - Low - Medium Density Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) South - Low- Medium Density Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) East - Law - Medium Density Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acref' West - Medium Density Residential (8-1,4 dwelling units per acre) 4110-11 ;r' �3 r ,4 . PLAfW W"CONN Wag STAFF REPORT TENYATIVE TRJ T -13303 - lSWIS fiGgS December.-9- Page 2 E. Site Characteristics: `ih i site is presently. vacant with a 2 percen s ope-i =nas no�`r'zo south. The project wilt be bounded by Mountain View Drive to the norih. Terra Vista Parkway to the east, ,,a grae¢}nry trail and vacant land in the Medium Residential zo a "to the south. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is propo,.Ing a new product type, the aries, which utiliz-es>>a wider and shallower lot; The lots range in size from 3,5Ok square feet to 6,600 sc{uare feet with an aversge lot size of 4;3 5 squ?kre feet. The park series product is 'a center plot, singie,lamily hone; however it features a recessed garage with a larger living area visible to the streetscape. B. De3i n Review Committee: The Design Review Committee 'a es ey, Wriix, Coleman) review-ad the project on November 190 1987 and 'foe:,d the product type to be an acceptable alternative that addresses concern regarding the streetscape in smal".1 lot tracts. The Committee recommended approval of the project, along, with one suggestion. The Committee requested thfrt the buildings incorporate greater differences in volume, bulk, and appearance along the street.; These additional det4ils were reviewed by the Committee at a meeting on December 3, 1987. C. Technical Review Committee: The Committee reviewed the project and UetermineH a the recommended conditions of approval, the project is consistent with all applicable standr...a_ and ordinances. _ D. Enviro. mental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been TO—IM—e— d� iy die applicant. Staff has completed part YI of the Envir ntal Checklist and found no significant impacts on the enviT�prment as a result of this project. III. FACTS FOR\, FINDINGS: This project is consistent, with the Terra s a anae c nity and the General Plan, and will not be detrimental ts nrracent properties, or cause significant adverse impacts. The proposed use, building design, and subdivision, together with all recommended conditions of approval, are in compliance with the applicable regulations of the Development Code and the Terra Vista Community plan. ,�i v 0 ?l 1T 6Orml PLANAR G7Ri�xG T iENTA �.3.. 11 December Page 3. J IV. CORRESPOIlD�1C.0 ibis Item has been advertised � in the Dail Rio t newspaper as a public hearing, the property posted, and nab feet the were sent to alx property`'btimers wittrin• 300 of project ' site. ` Y. RECOMMENDATION; Staff recommends that the Planning Commission ` approve e-n ,;ve Tract 13503, subject to the toad tions of approval, through adoption of thz attached Resolut103 and issUMIc:e +: of a Negative Declaration. Respe ully s q_kgitted, rad Bu erL-� /City P toner BB:DM:te Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Side Utilization Exhibit "B" - 5ubdiviSio'Map ` Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Exhibit "A" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "E" - Building Elevations E Resolution of Approval with Unditions t t: i SITE y • •. 1 S yy s pp' "•jr 4i �, . i � / .'� r• y� r a � 11; I�����,�!lII�I',1A. � �F � -' � , ar�"!'w- en..:�.:a'�1 4+• CIS RANCHO CLTCANL-WA PLANNING DfVM N rrEM: 13✓ a 4 ol et f L Xyy' NORTH 1 H W. CITY OF PLANNING DIVISION ExKiBrr =_��__..�.�. �t�: / * uv''.s _ --b op ire of p �ft s* NORTH CITY CF rrEM= 44503 PLA.Pii:"r M D NY,'i EXHIBIT. 8;;9" K:# LE DETAILED SITE PLAN TENTATIVETRACT NO 13303 iY 1X3 CITY OC RANj Np SYNC z ov *�V • � .CO41,TY OC ^.M iCC11AlpINQ Of GALIfptMl+l 'i p v ��pgisYyllB7 • ~ wi.Y• Qlrp.i ACtCS as W. o �� is s. ncY .Cxes .np /� rpr.. ruxr i r� cwrou '" r•i,. � t�.as v��� 4 1 O / ` j ♦� �A.� j � h rC A; .3 4 1 �W Cl TY OF rFEM- 4. �� • 60,17 PLANNING DrVISK) is s ���777 � + • re�V� +e1MMIMw+Y� ' � I . � . �/l�Mrh Ii tK €i,EVATIQN �' niw�aniooa� ,.fir yM y r EICVA'n0N B LEWS HOMES PLAN ONE ' f • Jr .l,l.ttttt.t,i +�i'N7rtf'41} r gt � f F\ F� I�w f NTH ._ CITY OF rr-Ms '�'5 RA-NCM CUCkMaNCA TrIUt �y PLAN NM IXVMN EXHIBIT --� � SCA.LE: I *-I All L Al. VIDL, VA**r WAWW � III zi r.. ii, LEM$ HOMES PLAN TWO Vat ELEVATKN C C11W CF RA UTTIO CLVAUNCA nANNM DfVIRON 6-10 SCALE, [II rl� NOM ELZVA'.f(.IN A L Al. VIDL, VA**r WAWW � III zi r.. ii, LEM$ HOMES PLAN TWO Vat ELEVATKN C C11W CF RA UTTIO CLVAUNCA nANNM DfVIRON 6-10 SCALE, [II rl� NOM . -app tYx .. ,rr *eit mr.fmf+, TtMSi'�y�� \��rirl r y: %• _. e d N.rrrrr•r i tt��''�� � f 1 � � � � i � j�`,? ..s ELEVATION A .{uoos • i{1n•iTNOFO OVB� C011GIA TN IIOK A. EL9VATION B LEMS HOMES PLM TACF— ONO ...;.f:e1.1. +. {.aa. rs ri. {r.{d r{.f,�,t i %.�)R,r 1.. •i ;y �'. S 7N r, M• 'i � � ! •A wY � •. �.., irk ���, t.�l / � ELEVATION C V� NORTEI I CITY OF rrEm: 77- /A,:-�1709 PULNNING MUM EXHIBM SCALE. PIT j j lie ELEVAt-,ON 8 LEWS HOMES - PLAN FOUR taw Ex ELEVATION C NOM cirf (T RANCHO CUCAINUNGa-I TnTLE: PL LNNM Drl&,r jN EXHiBr, SCALE. R -ALL rril n lEvATION A Toll"Tocco ovta car,- :,n "Amm- PIT j j lie ELEVAt-,ON 8 LEWS HOMES - PLAN FOUR taw Ex ELEVATION C NOM cirf (T RANCHO CUCAINUNGa-I TnTLE: PL LNNM Drl&,r jN EXHiBr, SCALE. 'gym ; • : ilkF w;8 AKdi /161! RFAR. tEVA7pN ,! LEf I sm IL LEM NOMM - TEMA VIBTA, fn.A.y 7 " t y� or k EL _ — w LEM MOM VWA PLRsS P az* wnwus 1nr,cau 311011111111 �,I • � r-*t,w- a�ncao nrt HEM EL`i'A7fON LEFT 563E y ---Lem M,73 - TERRA it I A PLAN 3 - - . - n"m F IYGkC 167 1 E a"ATXW tx;T 51 W L MS - TMWA VWA PLAN a NORTH CITE' RANCHO CL)CAjNUNGA Tff L---. PLANNING DI.VEM Ex.HIL:rr SCALE= al RESOLUTION NG. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING C044ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13303, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION AND DESIGN REVIEW Of 96 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 13.98 ACRES OF LAND IN THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED C" UNITY DESIGNATED LOW- 14EDIUM DENSITY (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TERRA VISTA PARKWAY AND MOUNTAIN VIEW DRIVE - APN 227 - 151- I3 AND 14 A. Recitals. {i) Lewis Development Company has filed an application for, approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 13303 as described in the title of this Resoluti 4. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application ". On th- 9th of December, 1887, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga canductet 'a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution r have occurred. r` B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by -she Planning Commission of the City of R{archo Cucamonga as follows: 1. This ; mission hereby specifically finds thikt all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resoly }ion are true and correct. j 2. Based upon substantial evidence,;i�presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing db December 9, 1987, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission herety specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the southwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain Vie►: Drive with a street frontage of *886 Beet and lot depth of *770 feet and is presently unimproved; I and (b) The property to the north, south, east and west of the subject site is vacant. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing end °upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: PLANNING COh>ISSION RE&7LUTION NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 13303 - LENTS HOMES December 9, 1987 Page 2 - (a) That tentative tract is consistent with the General man, Development Code, and the Terra_ Vista Community Plan, and r (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General P,Zant.,, Development Cade, and the Terra Vista Cowonit�/ Plan; &nd If (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial eisvironmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or ,f their habitat; and (e) The tentative tract Is not likely to cause serious pabiic health problems; and I' (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the, , public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and Oasidered in comr:iance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, furthc , this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conz�lusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Design Review (1) Each lot within the project shall have a minimum (2% slope or less) rear yard open area from building to property lines or slope /retaining wall of 15 feet. In certain situations, rear yards less than 15 feet may be acceptable provided larger areas are provided elsewhere in the side or rear yard. Nr ".'1er, rear yards shall not be less than 12 feet: A final detailed ti-t9 clan shall be submitted for the review -' and appprov...- J the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. �d I 1471 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION,-,40. TENTATIVE TRACT :13303 LEWIS NES December 9, 1987 Page 3 ro (2) nt yard landscaping is to be provided by the eveloper. Each lot shall be provid(%,d with a minimum of one 5-gallon and one 16-gallon tree, shrubbery, groundcover, and lawn planted in combination to provide a pleasing and aesthetic environment. All lots shall be provided with a permanent, underground Irrigation system. Street facing side elevations on �kll corner lots, and the street facing elevation for the second story of all two-story units shall be upgraded with additional architectural embel I I shments. These architectural upgrades shall be included on the architectural plans and shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. (4) Corner side yard feming and/or walls shall be set back a minimum distance of 5 feet--from the back of sidewalks. (5) Fencing andlor walls along corner side yards or sidewalk returns at street intersections shall be set back five feet minimum back of sidEwalk. (6) All retaining walls visible to the general public, i.e., on the street side of corner side yards and within 'he front yard, are to be constructed of a decor tive -material to the satisfaction of the City Plann:r. - -All wood fencing installed by the devetoper shall be treated with water sealant or staining. (7) Landscape treatments, at the end7 of side-on cul-de- sacs shail be design6t; +rwprovide an -pen view into the Interior of the cu,(_6&sac. Design treatments shall include the use of decorative wrought iron fencing for those cul-de-sacs faci,,ig Mountain View and Tirra Vista Parkway. All other cul-de-sacs shall remain open with pedestrian access to the greenway trail system, (8) A 6-foot high masonry wall shall be provided along the tract perimeter adjacent to Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain View Drive. The wall treatment along both Mountain View Drive and Terra Vista Parkway shall be consistent with the existi g design along Terra Vista Parkway and shall ben submitted for review and approval to the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. The walls on Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain View Drive shgll be staggered a�iid off-set to increase visual inta�'est. A _A1 W777. 71, PLANRIOG GOF 4I5SZ;QN 00LUTION NO. TERTATIVE T T 40303 - LEWIS HOMES December 9, x.987 Page 4 Landscape maintenance easements will be requ;red here perimeter walls encroach 0,4to private lots, and are to be dedicated on the final map. i:inal planning of all °fences and locations -,of all easements are to be determined prior to redardation of the final map. (9) Each driveway shall. receive special landscape treatment in order to enhance the appearance, of the street scene, siichi) as brick band rig, special concrete fini =sh oi.r border 'treatment in like material's.. The driv6oy hardscape details shall be included in the land '#pe /irrigatibn plans subject to the review and app 41 of the City Planner. i..�ubdivision lop (1) Terra Vista Master Plan Stony Drain sine 5 -1 shall be constructed from the project to Deer Creek Flood Control channel to the satffaction of the City Engineer prior to occupagt' - :,- any buildings. (2) The following streets shall be coni ;:Acted full width for the stated limit except that offsite sidewalk and parkway landscaping may be deferred until development of the adjacent property; a. Milliken Avenue from Base Line Road to Foothill Boulevard including landscaped median; b. Terra Vista Parkway `rom` ,3illi PLANNI,NO %COi t2 SSIli .:R6OLUTI ON No TENTATIVE *,Att 1S;3O3 - =LEIWIS HOMES l S December, 9,`z'987 Page 5 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER :' '1987. PLAN4114G COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMORGA > BY: ¢` Larry T. McNiel, Mal Man �1 ATTEST: Brad u er, Deputy secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of tha_,Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the•.foregoiifg Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga-,at a Pegular meeting of the Planning.Commission held on the 9th day of Dece�), 1587, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: I;OES: COMMISSIONERS: `r ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 4 FF[p[ 2 1 T� pM��N4t ySi Y�,H ey. 6 If s r 'A �Ny �� CHAS 4.e0 q � Y w 6y _ YO��L Li� u u�.assw V GrC.VaJY N �'. '.� w �M �L •x N ~4 n or � s g i g ;i 9CN iui < «- isI m *� `\ a � ]F L O @ u _ R In N A ~Mw zt [Him~ • � M V M � � p V PY to !• V�rN �A it qL. +��n y Spa gV9i'3 =:.- � +Y�R p �7 +� `�•a tVj rlJj y'jj \yam{ .i Em �f W Et gs• a± IHS aa+ *p�i� +$Ya �Nb^ Z.OE�ll uiL�10 Isis y y i M Y JN y�y p w M� g O u �9av if a VU 4 S 1t V 73. ^Y S. aim a a ^� �.e r pis _xisyy4X at �`•� i u N 4 r� kS� }• Ni �s _aw�tt •� Y Y ita p y ii Q 9 Y �a ;. f.1� ¢ ,�e `s a. $mow .� �w �� • Y & ^3Z '�� '�'�_ gigs _yyy a^ ads r•�..r - %i `"� a" �'i� .. $.�. $ �a Nyi.;�Y N 4 :ages �Awc y`l 3y yyV`4{1.w �Oi R+rYur Qi «goo C Zi ��� i�� Vw ywyvia;t: :s5Y3 �a wa GO Y� Y ^y Zit H� =# I� Y.�` N YM4. ^a. a 8ti a Nrr� J0 • N' M "fir V`a C +6 VoA. �g if `y!y~+ ®may `S ®gip g ^- ! �Zq�i p` ♦any YY' YO! �L y { ^��yy�iYN�O83Y►yzyp LV.��iN+yw V6i C "V C4 iG wM li Fes. Ma K�Mq iux K`V,' .0f tj d`nV:: 1z d O nt ax s�",.5 Eli Elba -� Y i V M p y ii Q 9 Y �a ;. f.1� ¢ ,�e `s a. $mow .� �w �� • Y & ^3Z '�� '�'�_ gigs _yyy a^ ads r•�..r - %i `"� a" �'i� .. $.�. $ �a Nyi.;�Y N 4 :ages �Awc y`l 3y yyV`4{1.w �Oi R+rYur Qi «goo C Zi ��� i�� Vw ywyvia;t: :s5Y3 �a wa GO Y� Y ^y Zit H� =# I� Y.�` N YM4. ^a. a 8ti a Nrr� J0 • N' M "fir V`a C +6 VoA. �g if `y!y~+ ®may `S ®gip g ^- ! �Zq�i p` ♦any YY' YO! �L y { ^��yy�iYN�O83Y►yzyp LV.��iN+yw V6i C "V C4 iG wM li Fes. Ma K�Mq iux K`V,' .0f tj d`nV:: 1z d TI, hi +Z .00ia4tl' �ppO L qd 4L' g�i OOOO aaY.. rya L r 0 mss C �� 1a' Y L 4;0 06666 Y a 1Y 4 YSy.�su C t � O L LM�G �1� y �j` p•.�" bY����tq �aM rML Oi��� 4 'O tls is O Y Y �N Vq�$,S Y « «Y �O w��•F�X s M M pp ■��.. 'L' 6 `` y`1 ap(N k Y w M. �l `�y1 'Mw' y Oy�V YEN 6 Vill My'Oy"YG?•wMa`�Mi NN�CN w+ C «{� Y.y Y�r .,1•�F '�•Sy W`.�ii���YM�f �Q�t�_ �`VV� y�YM a" N N ag�„ Ufa_ Ms rIP F ;�yE' 2« «��'�, ^C a `vs�»,a :.��� • �� I N S Z `� �� ~��'�� _�"�• NON YY ltr �lw ~_�N`3 a Nw�IY aMa��1 ee. _ Y 1M� C _ y yy �apj¢ �c1 V1 Y. �IIN <M.{v K '1MO Ni RNA° - fill �! !� K 0 ILI ad CN° NQ 6' ns YOG. RG ` �F ` I T w Z...a a ��•�� ~per 9`W� A Y. C . • IL e lid t � N > Nw q0'� ^! • \ YIYly a T`�' �1 Y'r1�g4 y� N .4 {' r' 1 � a! � fyyyl �R yir yy �+ OF Gw!�y � • T ` M }�Q ~Y��1 }� 6KC ` VVV lV� �W M^ ^ �' Qa� yY �� OV Y09 �� _ •¢ti m�w� y�Ir�wy�eC «yY ��Xw +Y � �w • C y'V MNN ttM� �� `.;RO iC7�4 6 M .w 34 .Y -_ ;, �a lo- 'S t X33 Vg�yr yY yyV � Nj Yy 3 MS • 1-4 w CQ_ "jiig.N. InW °�!. 4a'mg O•{O� Ol,r � CI•i1".p N L _ Y• {LpW YO �qa r � A N � � L � � •� � � � � � �i � Y.w � c 0 C pp0{ Y LA M w 9V M4 Y yN is fill M t.NTV� LC Qr NM r pM! qyyqp�. ...N fill My /�yMO'aMi�V y/� •TYp S « aaN L.yYw e� Wy �} as {�Y. O yNyi SYpa �. �il �t,T Wa � Y y {aL { 333N i, Y �CCCw 14C■ L�{9 Y �Cw f{Y�so w ipiLL, b �R wY EV V�pL =ai WO�«ae Aal < 't a`IYors 32 N 11 L) E E 11 a w Q 4 M YM (��• !..• �j Z r�a Z ��S w � _ Y� «j�Qj• lid ^ w yC.�.O•� % 'if-Is s$g L b cm U] Nf 4 S 43M a �. `L 7SS +8 ° � 9y -3 T yc a VO`Y =YY ^JYOY_ N�Y{Y4 GYtO Q�a V �N �YY� YM A'sa WVq 2-11 Y 0. Oy•K �s.6. ».t. ggY • TL _Ma .41 A �C u ypg � d 15- ZU i J «Gi aa33 + y �® Hai a aYY rr z *bZ-,y It ji in, NA U.. N .C. 37.L• ft�� t v! 6yf�y yPun U-nL�. CC _N. Ehr Y¢ ffi . • O{f is .Z 5M 1423 o o pu> III- I -if. f r 43i ��wu 3y �,Kg •Y� � � �' Y SHS- =1.Z t &� ¢401 9v._.. gn V �Y � N w.l w -212 -3 jV -ms s Z r�a Z asg qy yw L b •Ny `d `L �Y V« `•ar Y Y 0. Oy•K �s.6. ».t. i ��s <d• `� ¢ pCCU Na Y Y} 3 gP Z w Y j V nv r ti via a _u L N ASV_ p y iW Y LS �¢5 V w! 7 0 a i 1 a-- MC �^ 8 4 y- 3 L L Q Y W IaO�� L 0. V L « a° Y _ L 6 C L V C .3n • � Tim' www.s w g � 'i 8 � i'•_ g g "'.� Jig km Y•�. =1N� ^ ^ �� YAM �v. z¢ Ir :. $yY � V " t�ry a firi g� i 1. •� 3! ���,, g� 3 3 11 i s i *' L M 9E4a �. - ZZ R s+ i � F �5 �iJiye�si� SU as ,zat .�. a L i a N� • • Y 13 1 JSjfj N y •� � ms y� w� % LiY y«� �6 �Q� y J MtO� it E1h VNA �e i0 00+x. �wyit aQ I N w H'i w u s v s �.~. a u ,� 11 N.. Y ' -'""�' ® «: � °'� '$� "� P «•may'. i ��+ le VA Te Ij 3i N M s 3� 5$ N V L � � M K 4 M u s « S 3IL II 43ML 9 4 » 1�1 W Li a� t » V + M _ N 3w m CQ Fix , 8 y wV7 Y� -R �» �Y y E it W _a &' r.-% -i » Y -j e + ° 9a '« » _Y » $2,, 2$p ay•�` 4I L ;• 8 Le i t7,y. �•. r 1f �F Ls +a a gYY pwY.wy y 6 g ggoo _�� 9 Arr� Lam.. iaL a.. rf L ®ssy 'M ®y�1. '�o W ' y p .16ti� _.p►L z b. fj ES �lj a' s a $�a 5 `a wwy33 {' _ yy t � , p `'3• gypp: alic Yy Y� a aA • °p. a+ T•� CC�» � /��: 9Vii Y�Y L oY rLi �a1 �pq YYY_ay L L gLLA Y� S C y r, {Y�ra ♦ \ a1'� Yr^ MST K w MN M� <Q� G•.iVi� iD V. ACC o ai I K A, r � .3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT "77 0 1977 UA I z: December 9, 1987 TD: Chafii&art and Members of the Planning Colimission FRO14: Brad Buller, City Flanner BY- Debra Meier, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENV7ROWENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13280 M MA MJ7. - A resi denzi I asuallivi Sion -of 14ti sing'T rami iy jots M.958 aCres of nd in the Low-Medium (4-8 dweiII03 mnits per acte) Distric� lma-ted north of Base Line bptnen� Mlliken—and"�Rochest6r within the,�,ictoria Plann" Covilunity APR 227-081-06. I. PRWECr AND SITE DESCRIPTIJN: A. Action ReVested: Approval of subdivision map, conceptual grading plan, conceptual landscape plan and- issuance of a Negative Declaratior,.� B. Project Density: 6.05 dwelling ur�its per ac��e. C. Surroundini Land Use tonid Zoning: Norfn - vacanf;MR09a Planned Community South - Vacant; T.erra:,Vista Planned Community East - Vacant; Victoria Planned Community West - Vacant,* Victoria Planned Community D. General Plan DesignatioAs: Project Site - LoW-Ra-dTulm—Density Residential, (4-8 dwelling units per dcre) North - Low-Medium Density Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) �outh - Low-Medium Density Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) East - Low-Medium Density Residential (4-8 dwelling units p/ar acre) West - Low-Medium Density Residen�lal (4-8 deel7irig units per acre) E. Site Characteristiq,�: The site is presently vacant with a natural 3 percent sfo—pe from north'to south. The project will be bounded by Base Line Road to the south'a'nd Belvino Loop Road to the north, east and west. ITEM P PLAH:VIHG 4IR if2SSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TMCT 13280 WILLIAM LYON December 9, 198 Page 2 II. BACKGROUND: On August 12, 1987, th4e P" revised ctoria Vineyards South as established the land use designation- locations. Subsequently, the Plannin Map 9350 which esisblished the lacy development, and dedicated street rigk° collector streets, The applicant is Parcel 2 into Tots for future s , development and to, "2stabiish pede circulation within that tract. 111. ANALYSIS: A. General: For this: Aivision, y—p eat "y rectangular 'dot, variav with a minimm lot size of 4,000 being 9,OW .quare feet and an aveo feet. The featured product proto, family home. As required by the I uota of on -site recreational vehi tw; total lot will be providet;-on i an erpanded side yard (10 foot min- B. design Review Comitteet The TR a es e.,y, RPM, , ,ol emaan) revi 19, 1987 and recommended apor, applicant. C. Technical Review Committee: Tht Coma and aetermined that with e special standard conditions of approvzl, the all applicable sta, ards and ordinanc D. Environmental Assessment: Part 1 00 comp e e- y the app c;a . Staff Environmental Checklist and found r environment as a result of this pr( IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is Plannea community and the General Plan. to adjacent properties, or cause signi proposed use, together with all recommc is in compliance with applicable rag Code and the.lttctpria Community Platt. JUI L IM > At! tt it.Palt7 T�E a;s - RSA l.Yc� Oieen� @r Page 3 a V. CORRESP13b�E�l0 GhiA itf has been advertised in The D�a�i�ly Rep,,ort newspaper as a p;iGic he, and notices ware sent to owners eiithfirr,89G� fsei, of the projett site. Vi. REC(k�4EHDAT W-I Staff rreccow. pds that fire Pl,Anning Comsdssion pprivn a ,� xe Tract .132811, subjeC to the conditions of approval, thr- adoptlOn of the attached :Resolution and issuance of a Rcgative'V aratirn. Res ;Xfu9l submitted, 8 l * City fanner Attachments: Exhibit 'A" - Site Util'j. Lion �= Exhibit ''!;' - Site Plan . Exhibit "C" - Prodpct Prototype Exhibit "D" - c nceptual Landscape Exhibit °E` Conceptual Grading-Plan 'i IoK�YI'E-I CITY CF RAN UM CJCAMCWA Tom. Ae R AI'eiNM DRWICN EXHWr. ._SCP HYMM� ` 'RU r ®..i ifC1Ep177�•+C wxW wsrw•w1ws...wwena w� om JUric w,.v TWOL fummuff"mm CITY CF RANCHO CLUAWNCA tIANMNG v EXHIBIT- Jal' SGUE: �� „ � �� � v ��r 4Z ♦ a ' • Ch d :A A � A I � A � y J . •F, 7 3 u t3 Oi t7 u !! i• at • u 6i i1 " K phi- �.. ft fi !0 , iT• • tt ii H MUM FAM, 'RU r ®..i ifC1Ep177�•+C wxW wsrw•w1ws...wwena w� om JUric w,.v TWOL fummuff"mm CITY CF RANCHO CLUAWNCA tIANMNG v EXHIBIT- Jal' SGUE: �� TFACr UM UWM FAiK �.i w to 3`S.. of rr trA u rt 7t ' 71 17: rs 7e l� rs— t 2AMUM MOM Sam= VWW aaaaa� era s�-r / s�rNS� #cart � . NQRTH MY CF n-EM. gAek�p JIM •4 � � e. I� • � l � � O itx+31 ~ I V lOr M W O.w , tJ r•� � 4 to x Ta= �• 1M e= �„ 8aa a in.. 17 (`r ' W fl� r t ;:. i a 87 w to 3`S.. of rr trA u rt 7t ' 71 17: rs 7e l� rs— t 2AMUM MOM Sam= VWW aaaaa� era s�-r / s�rNS� #cart � . NQRTH MY CF n-EM. gAek�p JIM RESOLUTION Nil. `e 4444 A RESOLUTIO8 OF, THE PLANNING COWISSION OF THE CITY Cc RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13280,, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 145 SIDLE FAMILY LOTS ON 23.958 ACRES OF LAWD IN THE LOW- MEDIUM (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACr:2) DISTRICT LOCATED NORTH OF CASE LINE ROAD BETWEEN MILLIKEN AND ROCHESTER WITHIN THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY - APH 227 - 081-06 A. Recitals. (i) The Williams L,y3:i Company his filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No, 13280 a#. described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map reduest is rrferred tows "the application ". (ii) On the 9th of December, 1987, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing °on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. 1 'i B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commiss�.;n of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Eased upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing -'an December 9, 1987, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located on the nortii side of Base Line Road, between Rochester and Milliken with °#reet frontage of (1968 feet and lot depth of 1500 feet and is presently unimproved;. and (b) The property to the north, south, east and west of the subject site -is vacant land; 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commis�,n n during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and the Victoria Community Plan; and �f �i 9 PLANNING COMMISSIGN RESOLUTION N0. TENTATIVE TRACT 13280 - WILLIAM LYON. December 9, 1987 Page 2 (b) The design and improvements of the tentative tract are cons;stent with the General Plan, . Development Code, and tte Victoria Ciwnity Plan,; and (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and (d) The design of the subdivision Is not likely to cause substantial envimmwntal damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and (p,1 The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and (f) lb: of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the publi% at large, now of record, for access through 'Ir use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. This Commission herroq finds and certifies that the proj�t has been reviewed and considered in cbt,iliance with the California EnvirL:: -*ntal Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragrIAYh 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division = (1) Prior to the recordation of Tract 13280, Parcel Map 9350 shall be recorded. (2) This map is being approved as a Tract Subdivision only. Any '° ture proposals for t e development or five or more residential units shall require Design Review approval prior to the issuance of building permits for any units. (3) The William. Lyon Company shall submit a disclosure statement for this tract to be reviewed and approved by the City Planer prior to distribution to prospective develop -rs of this tract. The disclosure statement shall include the City.._: Rancho Cucamonga's conditions, requirementt�, ,` and expectations for develo(77ent standards and product types for this tract. � ') f2, T IPW r t LIM LYON December 9, 1987 Page 3 (4) Landscape treatments at the end of the side -on cut- de-sacs shall be designed to provide an open view I nto =ncinqiwal or of the cul -de -sac. (5)/ The is requ %,ed for the tract shall W_ consistent with the fencinglwail #'indicated on the co%, eptual landscaping plan. Wood fencing exposed to public view shat' be treated with stain, paint or water sealant. Fencing on corner siae yards and fencing along the Belvino Loop Road shall be decorative block. (6) Prior to occupancy of more :than 50 percent of the units within the trrcty the pedestrian trails shall be improved with s1vdewalks, landscaping, irrigation, and lighting. The plans are to be reviewed and approved by the City Planner acid Cite City Engineer prior to the issuance (tf building permits. (7) Any retaining tAalls useti'are to be a maximum of four feet high. _ (8) All retaining walls visible to the gonar�`! `plibTfic ' i.e., on the street side of coraar, std yards and within the front yard, are to be constr,cted of a decorative material to the satisfaction 0\ the City Planner. (9) All back of lot grade differentials are to be a maximum of 12 feet. (10) If the intersection of Base Line Road and Mountain View drive is to be signalized, a sidewalk shah be provided out to the street crossing location for trail connections between Terra Vista and Victoria communities, Engineering Divixiot (_) The entire Belvino Street (east and west) shall be constructed full width except that offsite sidewalk_, and parkway larto,`gaping on the opposite side of the street may be defArred until development of the adjacent property. (2) Base Line Rord shalI_be constructed from Milliken 1t Avenue to Rochester Avenue as follows: a. Full wfdth for the north roadbed, Irtc,ud^ing sideway ,and parkway 17ndscaping adjacent ; to the development; 1-213 PLANNUG COMMISUONESO ' )RLUTION NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 13280 - VILWAM LYON R December 9, JkB7 Page 4 -r b. Full median island including landscaping; c. Minimum 26 fee; pavement for the south rot ,4ed; and d. 'The cost of one -half of the median island Wand the additi,�nal 26 ' fot., wide pavement for t.�e soutt` `badbed shall be subject to reitbursement 'ffr ! the adjacent property owner upon that property's development. (3) Occupancy, permits shalt not be issued for any - h ildings, except m de: 'homes, until the completion 9,, Phase II of the `,sly Creek Channel. (4) The 'ztorm drain system shall be constructed in Base Line Road from Milliken Avenue to Day Creek Channel to *.he tatisfaetior.— of the City Engineer prior" to occupancy of any buf., ng. (5) The existing overhead, utilities (telecommunications and electrical a except for the 66 Kv electrical) on the project side of Base Lire,, Road shafl be undergrounded from the first pole on the west side of Milliken Avenue to the first pole on the east side of Rochester Avenue, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs ;,first. Toe developer may regw st a reimbursement zqgreement to recover one -half the City adopted cost for unnergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. (6) The project is to drain to the currently unimproved Day Creek Channel; therefore, no construction, i building ur grading permits shall be issued until Phase 111-6f the Day Creek Channel improvement project is under construction. 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission.,. shall certify to the adoption of this Resclution. APPROVED AND LgOPTED THIS 917W DAY OF DECEMBER, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McKiel, Chairman ATTEST: r Bull . erpi5l� 777 71; 7 7'ENi?�El�tsi+� • i' I-s ?' -°'. Ltd L YQi1 \, a Page S .1 I, Brad Buller, t?eputy, Saorq'itary of the Planning Coloft ''On of h City Yif Rancho Cuca,01, rto f4rebi cert` 6 that the f0regollig Resolution ava --duly :err#, regularly fntril cid', etdd, axed- adopted by the Plmoinq Co"issfion of the � City of Rancho ;.,r( n#s�, .at a reguli� ettng Hof the Pianhiig CoaMission held on the sth clay of Oeoj r� IM, by the foYlowfng vote -to -wit. AYES: "_rasz4?�JtS...> HOES. C!' WISSI`t�, =: �? ABSENT: COMdISSIORR'S. \\ \l I t jg Y p'� Y CIN YLY �•, pp CEO �fl�aa y�. Qp a�l7� • { \,j L31�G.�O N� ,a2A -rot Q 1}p: •CL L NNk NY~ J4 Y C'Y�. °•1µ n'Yr, i PlN .,u. #u ws.�,i TEY•.. i V3 CL 4JT � CJM.y 1.6, Y�YY/N V M. 4 MG • I1Y -af� ,.L 3 V i V - Alf YYYM �� it ♦ Y Y— 1ApC v 11. •I > p N M r wi. ~gx w `Y :S�YOvE �Yy NgE K` �,` y ~g•C a ^saas} ' S i 1r —W M —N •� u l— ' 1 Na] 2 D Q � M N ff 0 -t ri lip'' `.,8d Grp I R =i= ��MCyy b O Q Ey CCa hag 4 s Og1•Y ����sss qRq i� �aLi Y +3Y �Qx M yy a EllNr•� :� 4� El 3311Niw°,:. ri i i am N•� p N PA p Y 9 OO RNtl Ca "A! a N R C�sv9T'@ YI,sN.L V Y+� N ` Y�r' q Ya d yy Q y N N. w II �.ii a.Yfl -t ri lip'' `.,8d Grp I R =i= ��MCyy b O Q Ey CCa hag 4 s Og1•Y ����sss qRq i� �aLi Y +3Y �Qx M yy a EllNr•� :� 4� El 3311Niw°,:. ri i i o w W R 0 g�^ IL a 4 N Z N g- 4 ° •- s "tea YY s 45 `py d M ° Y•^ N " a LE :. -a g A @'. ,V��e N^ � V N, O = s�8lsfe I I c`CC 9= O u ?s • � pp�_6 YJ�'d'' s ♦ V 6 Yy® 71�a 0 M � M �� �osryy �S Nom' M^3 „eeM 'osWY L L'g b O = � • t ll � � N � G M p ' I xL p T �N 3 wl a C YY i11 O ^.y • N o sNYTL Z N�49 4 a• N q s� A E Y � $ Y {an 2;: y e�Y�QY ^G o "4 ^`jtppt VYeL Op �6�'Y T& WRTC�LY� N.1 yrl Y M epi�o. yM ayt ` i i W 3 L M� s Y ~ gg - 3` NNg .� &� g� �� :�'� • 3�° egg «� �aa «.� _ _vb 4c�N•CY'i ' Y S M �L. OY ' g — e a a >sos g Y a'� $ r`p"... o' ^'° Sig $a,gtl !j..=!- V�G V ass r ' b V w S.:z �' Y' S^ q Q . Y � � N'M YG. Lte +Yw Rd�� N ° ^ -Ls Y C Yi.L a Ss6 i..' � C� �w�NYY �ype�Y Oy�V1 4� • R C�. p�VN}A�A}���� ��PGL N� O�y.�f 6YV lam. NO Nf� ec ,Y �/Y'Y OY •�Yi.r.w �YgN Y Y��Y...L ;rI fopp;` _go $ 8" �8'.i opSo`4 «�aY'aaa "sss�f.{�1tl w= a Ou�,a SmO ^ g a6 ^u q.. I� O1`Qg6O�Y 1S. Sy.GO•p. ~ r V4 wai ^R oM v c3 g cY 8c"q`aw 3�x1� sg. ' FaynYe ac W b�3� $ 1� � a� �_ �`,:qt ..'�{ely wpOw ^ol+w� �� �1� • � °� T. I` �yy{C{µ •CIt dy X•9M��g'w$$ �j�c ..' r�tl'�� :p a 14 0,0WNOGs M. ss fa to *���`n Is- Y� �E.'R � o .5. N'3 }k4ta Uses s Est "tl r. �.atld`i.N .p. N�1 AiLO Q N�tl ^O�� 6L� r.ik..�`YL Ei1MM.`_ �� ,(�u p ^� 41 e• < M ^ < M = N q F. i i N .. Nawp p =. V YO6L V� ap? 0.3 tl ._Z_z W IL �2 _ � + tlO ^)1.- ... «,rs =pZ Ni` tlyNO py'l� me- {1 EX p V� > uu�� � •• i O ^� M W� y y� a N W M N�� Q Yom. G !i• O� �Qyw 4���Nppp Y aM q Yob� 6 NY Ey ii us ss(y`1 CCn `6 iYQ ^Im al Is wwii O _ ii Go yJ �vY �7'r �^ ~ F� '�Y.» i.11 � ' ,tl_Mt ■yyY NYN� Y pil • 4 ; M ay 1r a 6Y a L Y`' V ryYqit�o•LI g a Y Y> tlytl tl • Vw C AG�•c� mow.. OrYq �W `ice 8� /c- y G + N a= L qqC ppL..� yy Q e G-5vM VV� �� 4J yyNywV Ntci�'MO z v ---f V+ !vp G6 1 tl Lrtls N i .� N9^6nV c pp '^IQ SG g0,1,,� al` N .. VVVy L. ^ "G Y 6Np yi L C Ems' a N= Ci"`V "tlr p" ..�_ ;V. Law,. EY.pi —.3 .�. y,�j Ito, yyba ^��.. M. a_ L N N fl s YS.; 9—S Mme ¢_K ^C?b �Y O^ i ttOY «N �E.Y V ;�y�s ¢yNy <7�r� M <VM A -M �i„1 6O FON�A 40 C <.51 W� 83{3 J it ci R' Z w 0 L i n Ioil �S Y O gypp N Y'rf� MN a.^ ° SE U 11 = Y P Y ZM MI J s 4 - LaiNs_.��y• ohm R� IIY. -E2 w ii Y 6p L xs dg =_Q ^■ ail Y YM 6ti Y'�;yl� •NYN� i3ZS Q{� ON �i V ARJ !=a r Y ^i ing Pa"� p�SQf �i,ir�•s NgSp >uLA_ P6ais `3Y Y • ��'^C$ - e}y3pQYY , +3�"m `Y N kQ l A� L i n Ioil �S Y O gypp N Y'rf� MN a.^ ° SE U 11 = Y P Y ZM MI J s 4 ohm R� w 6p L xs T S •NYN� 6 Q{� ON w • i r Y ^i f NN6 >uLA_ Ilk �x; ilia _• �p� `g •= > w^ L 6Yf id q+Awx � Y• Y � Y � ' M Y �` V ^ F A S..e YY'.3 N 'N �w j.�.• `. .3$ $' g g "r -$ a �YC� N N V y'jf�'•+ C C� O�w 9 C Is V y 1 A N N� _�� C Nw� YY cCb �{ p� ~y Iry hMC P...'ri N 6 2Y� y R K.Ya iOC Qis M as �� V A N Y yV.B_UN �.L M Ny Yl�! 4! S2 Y .w..ryi�. I.-:= 1 4 'yyA�P� let C�� ^I gV 1� rN $� cx rA $ V Y ga -2 Y � - t L i� •�° l� g RQQQ N 000ppp111 WN y{yy � M � UPI YY i .'d AM �s�s,�7a• •S ZZ IL i N^ O rsa O V o geei�N M�a�VVyu��w ��CC� �� S g •'q,� yu� prig =Mo s °J ^Mt -EV p P 8� ii. 'a4 " Mai sU. n h • y 3 CO i i Y _V yj rN $� cx rA $ V Y ga -2 Y � - t L i� •�° l� g RQQQ N 000ppp111 WN y{yy � M � w 9-13 i$V OOyi 3 a Y 1LQ1 k N + r i si e ¢�N � 4Y, a aa•y LL' } LA Y •.� C "Yff °V•+� 9iav UTy� ` -i O Y yidp b' • d LVt �O(1y M O r7v yy cOO g Ay Oaa 4S •!i R�sa O� �a S L■r � Vy �i" Y+3 } 6M N �s YYY gO CIE V Oi M 1 S }ail as Q cn a s c'J `�' gia i 1- .O V 4� � .'d AM ZZ IL i N^ O O V o w Y V L n I, vaV 24 a uLi N VR � M •.�R QM �Y 6 f.� w 9-13 i$V OOyi 3 a Y 1LQ1 k N + r i si e ¢�N � 4Y, a aa•y LL' } LA Y •.� C "Yff °V•+� 9iav UTy� ` -i O Y yidp b' • d LVt �O(1y M O r7v yy cOO g Ay Oaa 4S •!i R�sa O� �a S L■r � Vy �i" Y+3 } 6M N �s YYY gO CIE V Oi M 1 S }ail as Q cn a s c'J `�' gia i 1- .O V 4� � eg N N _M CM Mme. yY OyM {Qj. L? ziMy,� tyeAl LLVng ~ YY12 ~cS�aa «Fy N> L �• • N N N II sag ZHU ia x" I atz N i- „ ° '�, a- a.;; - Le n wis.f Ax — i� 'a . FF aalga `a ` l. �t 12 1 � L V Y Lw tt yy tm AiO � N LuVi i1.i'ti•.c. Wa.i;ti 3 Za y V In At pTu g!i g a �` "� 'g - V v s� is w . N = Y �� } fA 4z S� y _ Y ` $ its S� a 4y pN NVN iV Q y W L °M O~ shy • V 3. JC 8117 N K C W L+ K 6 C N Cryy r•a Y as �g• V L0 LL a� Ly r.. O W ppP ° L V av G i ri C CL NL S,Z ZJ o ��q J cYG� ILS � 3 ,,.• S 3(1 iic A p� 4%x_5 OIY ^ia ;3T..� tip= 4 7 4 \�_ 2%S OW reu M �pp,L r` w ryL .�2 ifgi l~ �� L L.^ Vwv 6i i•M O e1 K %d ` a`MV Yq NB.W 0 •mow' .0 6 as �g• V L0 LL a� Ly r.. O W ppP ° L V av G i ri C CL NL S,Z ZJ o ��q cYG� ILS � 3 ,,.• S 3(1 iic A p� 4%x_5 OIY ^ia ;3T..� tip= 4 7 4 \�_ 2%S OW reu M �pp,L r` w ryL .�2 ifgi l~ �� L L.^ Vwv 6i i•M O e1 L ! %d ` a`MV Yq NB.W 0 .0 6 I M nfn � v� s x " e e4 ` °yam' Lac .�ZAg ^oS yr« ,Q vg V Y. ^,� • 1, S y k. � ` Ay. r _� n`; a r r c `CY yV� Qy V r Y =fig :� �ay0�a Y gy y S 1 Me py� VNq dON N V T� ^• pP�U~. OYV Wr �O.," 6C,wM ■■.+ yy�� 4��2 O � i4 4. ¢a♦ � W T OF Y 6� py ,!r {� ^ � � �p A O <w hNY II^ <YRi G� <Y `MwM F"J w CL rl c «^ 6P 9 a CM eo Qrr YOM CL Ell e tta - M`M M,5 v E g w,40 a g�3 ea f $ 3 Vw 3 V 'i54 ! _ M!y! u s sE ZS 0pM4 C'J� L9000 µM V d^ 0.ui V.S o i[G14 tt i�NC r r u. I] DATE: TO: FRO14: BY: SUBJECT,.,. CITY OF RANCHO CUCA MONGA ST"F REPORT December 9, 1987 Chairman and ors of the Planning Comaission Brad Buller, Cili ,, Mlanner Debra Meier, Ass7iate Planner ENVI16NMENTAt. ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -39 E eve o nt of an Integraud community c opp ng center consisting of, four major retail buildings totaling 319,000 square feet, adjoining mall shops totaling 137,395 square feet, nine satellite retail buildings totaling 43,550 square feet, two satellite office buildings totaling 2?.,'25 square feat, four restaurant pads, and a 30,000 square foot theater. Conceptual approval for a design center consisting of ten buildings totaling 195,660 square feet. All on 71 acres of lap�,in the Community Comaerrial District of the Terra Vista ilaaned Community Iocated-at the northeast corner of _ Haven Rene and Foothill Boulevard - APN 1077 - 421 -05, 06, and 13. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Specific approval of the site plan, conceptual gradl ng Ilan, conceptual landscape plan and architecture for the theater, the fbur -ajor retail buildings, mall shops "A" through "L'°, satellite r4OAil shops "Mn through "N" and office 'buildings KXr and "Y ". As well as conceptual- approval of pad locations for four satellite restaurants and conceptual approval of ten pads that comprise the office design renter. g. Surroundin2Land Use and Zoning:. Norrrn - Yacan errs visza ri4nnea Co%anity South - Barton Plaza Office Complex;, Industrial Specific Plan, Subarea 6 - East Vacant; Terra Vista Planned rommunity Best - V4rginia Dare Winery Office Complex and Deer Creek Shopping Center, General Commmercial ITEM Q PLANNING COWISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87-39 "41OPERTIES December 9, 1987 Page 2 C. General Plan Designations: Project ` yYrommercial North Office South - Industrial Park East - Office West Commercial 1i. Site Characteristics: The site is currently used as a v neyar a mat ure Euclayptus windrow along Foothill Boulevard was previously approved, for removal with the temporary Terr„ Vista Inforrmation Ce:: Ar. The natuval ground slopes southerly as aFyroximately a 2 percent grade.,, The Town Center project is dir".ly north of the Barton PlUa office development and directly east of the Virginia Dare office/ entertainment center and the Deer Creek Village shopp'°ng center (see Exhibit "8 0). Terra Vista Town Center will al-6 serve as the southwesterly terminus for the punned community's graenxay trail. t. F. Parking Calculations: See figures outlined on Exhibit 'X ",' II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The Terra ylsta Town Center is made u�i of nearly 7 $'square fect of building area. Comprised of a desi,`% center office complex in the northwest portion of the site, ",% theater and courtyard In the northeast portion, with the`, southern portion of the site made up of the four major retail`,`, buildings with adjoining mall shops and courtyards and �ha potential for nine satellite buildings along the Foothill Boulevard frontage. The Terra Vista Greenway Trail essentially terminates at the southerly end of 'Elm Street as it crosses Town Center Drive. At this location, the sita plan provides a large open space park -like area. The pedestrian trail Men continues through the open space area feeding into the theater courtyard, complete with water feature-and fountain. From this courtyard, the on -site promenade begins its route through the site. The promenade features such unique items as a series of shaded seating kiosP dAcorative sidewalk and use of� a special accent tree (Jacaranua) thong its entire route. The promenade serves as VAe major pedestrian linkag_ of the site. It connects the mall shopping area to the satellite restaurants along Foothill as well as northerly to the design center and then feeding back again to the theater courtyard area. �r rl i� PLM$af 6 CM� OK STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT REVIE -W 8,7/-39 - WESTERN PROPERTIES December g, 1987 Page 3 i For b pcyclists heading south on the Terra Vista Greenway Sys*' an on -site bicycle path begins at the Gib Street inters4tion at Town Center Drive and continues ::autherly througr► =the traffic circle accessing malt shops and major retail stares. If the cyclist's destination is beyond Town J Center, a bilra lane is provided along both sides of the main entry aisle, Ming onto Foothill Boulevard. At the corner of the site, near the intersection of haven and Foothill, the applicant has created an architectural state"it using a pair of two -story .office buildings surraundin§% a courtyard. The courtyard has been designed to provide a view corridor from the street to the shopping center beyond, A water feature oriented to the streetscape serves as an invitation to view into the site by passing traffic. The architectural character of 'Town Center is a contemporary interpretation of the California spanish colonial style and elements of historical value existing within the cowaunity. The style features.tile roofs, plaster walls with softened _ edges and heavy timber trellis, and extens;::e architictural' a"1 detailing (see Exhibit "W). B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Chitiea, o s oy, KFOUMT revi—ewed this project on October 22, 1987. The Committee reviewed the various aspects of the project in regard to site planning. _rcltitecture and landscaping. The Comri °,se approved tide overall site design and architecture program a., the Oiler 22 meeting, Coowents and issues discussed a� that meeting are summarize d below: 1. Thr Committee eapret, PA -,the impor,'- ce of the identifiable character of the promenade as it circulates around the center, Such item as lighting, benches and other street furniture;- - sidewalk color and landscape materials will be consistent throughout the route -�f the promenade. 2. The applicant is currently investigatirr-.' the structural and aesthnic qualities of the =dear acrylic canopies, if research faits to prove it to be practtal, then glass will be used in these canopy a�*eat. ', 3. The applicant is also investigaviyig 'the ure of stone vbussoir at the entrance 'lj the major retailers of the �inigvc and d�-sU,.1,19uishing element. Exact materials wi17 be ittlewed and buldi d p the Planner p €ion to'issuance of -3 Q ��� w. -r , J Y � � ' W PL.4tilil� �OH��� RoR i DEVELOP�t2NT !tEf if - W TEM PROPERTIES( � December 9, 198 rage 4 4. Although the Committee very wh likes the use of toe fabric awnings, they :wanted the applicant to bit aware of the hig* winds in the area and to be rotain than these awnings be designed and installed in the mast wind resistant manner. 5. The Comsittee agreed that the appropriate tree theme for Foothill Boulevard is to ak ernate drifts of London Plane and Sycamore, rather than rasing the Eucalyptus. K 6. J!ll drivew+ary entrances tc the project shall make ! some entry statement. The use of accent or flowering plant materials, specially ;treated pavement, etc. would be appropriate *,,;, these locations. Perceptions of the "bock door' should r be avoided. r" A few igtsu�* of more significant concern were reviewed by the '; COMOttee tthiti To1&iwv- _,AroutI11 again on Nove�Kt" 19, 1987. At this a gig; t applicant presented revised I1ans... k that addressed the major Issues as identified on October 22, discussed at 5 1987. Three =Jor areas of concern were ,this . meeting. 1. Strert Furniture Pallet: The applicant has proposed a pallet Of SIC teat furniture to be ; consistent throughout Sown Center. Such iite~,ts as planters, ash urns, bench='` snd bike racks' will be of compatible color a *, saterial as other architectural features. Such identifiable features as grid patterned colored pavement, kiosk shade structures with benches, the If Jacaranda tree and the single lamp decorative -�- pone lights shall be used all along the promenade. Particular attention crust be paid to _ _ such deUils where the promenade narrows at store - fronts, ads along the west elevation of Building 2. Parking Lot Screening:.lon Haven and Foothill: `cars 1be pa fra�rr_fng t ave:.i and Foothill shall i►e screened by using either 3 foot turf be ms and where necesr.ary a low retaining wall with berming ap to the WdIX V The edge of the psrki ng lot is a j' fairy consistent 2 feet above the curb of Haven f - & Foothill, this lends itself well to such berming techniques. PLARNI E3 COMMON 5r REPORT DE1tDt lPM, 00Y, I�t 6t�- ' _ WESTERN PROPERTIES December '� i5il? page 5 ;i u` 3. Corw 96,i tyard at Haven and Fcm"il?: The coin aetgn as hwcs approve y the Comm► ttee. 'the more traditional trellis features are; Pvch uAre compatible to the existing area and more complimentaiy to the project style. The kvildlop have-.been moved back to Accowidate all setback rcquiraments and where the buildings were once separated by 40 feet, they are now 80 feet apart to allow a!visual corridor into the rest of this project;., The wmmmittae did make the following coirornts in regard to t #re courtyard design; ! a. the pe,estrian cr',' ynade ar311 play an ` important role in ,:he fun:tion of the courtyard. Wherever feasible, ouch a collonade shall be incorporated around the two story portions of the two buildings. b. The bus shelter shall be integrated both \, architecturally aisd' _ functionally to the "nearby t4-jrtyard ''die AAtails of the bus ,-shelter a-re to br.- i4cluded as wart of the detailed plan ca►eck. c.. The courtyard ' .,Ill include splashes of color, ingludingg vol"s hanging and Potted p%L s: Having resolved_ these revafn_iinng Issues the ee °:com cal or the Issues, Pertinent —Cwsaussfion -- r ZZ - ana xov r 19, 1987 have been inc3uded as conditions of approval on the attached resolution. C. Technle' Review Cam9mittee: The, Committee reviewed the project anT' erm ne d tnat, except for the issues described below, vwY the attached special conditions and re:,ommmended standard ,: onditions of approval the project is consistent with all applicadle standards acrd ordinances. 1. The applicant is requesting to use pole mounted 'tight fixtures which exceed the heiSlt limit allowed by the Development Code. S=ticn 17.12.00.X1.8 specifies toot "light standards shall oot exceed 15 feet in overall & -ght from the fine shed geade of Vie parking facility.' PLANN NG CO MISSION STA`T REPORT f DEVELOPMEMkT REVIEW 87-19 - WESTERN" ROPERTIES December 9, 1987 . i1 Page & -_ The purpose 'of the 35 foot height limit is to allow the tree canopy, to grow up above the fixture and allow the light -bear to spreaf: beneath the matite = i tree ,canopy. t° R €i, er than the,: tree growing o ''a similar ;night Js the light fixture anp, blocking the ifight source. or in the ca;`p of extreme ' height fixture th-2 tree canopy matures .aced bloci:s out the Tight spread. The applicant is`�-tposing three types of light fixtures for various areas on site. The tal "vest II fixture at 30 feet, YO inches is intended 'or use wiftin the large parking bays. The next fixture at .� SS feet, ''is a decorative pole with two laws,_ these" are used near the entrances to the Pajor retifl = areas. The 641lest fixture? is also a decorative Pole with only one lane, this fixture is 15 feet, 9 ' inches in height and is used along the promenade, within courtyards and otker smaller scale pedestrian areas. The Kanning�, Commission must Consider thin- information in regard tou the current code requir!,rAnts for light standards, and the applicant's request to deviate from that - standard nno provide direction to the applicant and sfaff with respect. to this issue. A varia,it:.e would be required or the Code stand -rd amnded.to allow the proposes light fixture ;nights. 2. The applicants will be required to construct a series Of traffic signals in conjunctio- with this project due to the anticipated amount of traffic generated 'by _ such a shopping center.,, These signals, requiredt are: Sprtxe Avenue at r othi1i Boulevard Spruce Avenue at :'own Canter Drive Haven Avenue at Tow? Center Drive Aspen Street at Foothill Boulevard P. Trails Adxisory Co =ittees The purpose of review of this prv2ect Defore the ra s Advise y Committee was to review the transition of the Terra Vista. Greenway Trail tsteu into the shopping center. ,lie Comm t' 01, reviewed - the project on October ::I, _1987 �(nd, -Ide th4 followii 4 reco+ ndations; i. Provide tbl;ntation to indicate where, the Teen belt cra s.;s'Town Center Drive, f iJ E E PLANNING COt!SSIGN STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW f7 -39 - WESTERN PROPERTIES December 9, 1987 _ Page 7 �i The greenway `trail will cross :own Center Dryer at the intersection with Elm Street. il* crossing a ?11 be specifically striped ' for pedestrians and bicycles. 11e bicycle prths wEl be provided with approprifte warning s' -nag# to indicate the impending q' -sing. 2. Provide a morx define: ;hin the center. The bicycled �6ould be separated from vehiculai-- cfr",, r. Also, east -west bicycle connections shouli, provide] throughout the complex. The b1 ycle path begins at slm Strec`,.and Town Center Drive and is directed to ''specific stripedlaccent crossings at the traffic circle. lace �,iis point, a d foot ride bicycle path is striped on both sides on the mfin entry dr've !existing onto enothiil Boulevard. The east -west bicycle connections have not been pr&viled. The traffic report provided by the applicant suggests that such paths would be un,afe for both bicyclists and vehicles dre to the amount of cross traffic encountered and the bicyclists having a false sense - .curity if bicycle lanes were present. 3. Stronger pedestr , _ :ifs .<ages should be provided over the entire site through more extensive promenad4s, the repetition of dements, and d.minant features to draw people from one area to another. Also, a prracnade should be provided from Restaurant Pad 4 to MssJor Terant 3. the identity 4 %f the promenade has b:4n st.; ,ngthened as discussed previously unde. the _ras-.gn Review comments. 4. Sigra�e should be incorporated at pedes.iian and Licycle crossings. E. Environarental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been c"caVl et_ y .are app can . Staff has completed Part II of the Environmei,tal Checklist and foesrd ac significant impacts on the envir:snmcnt as a result of thfo, prnject. "[. FOR 'I119INGS: This project is consistent with. the Terra `"w- WhTty pTan and the General Plan. The project will not Gu ,'i to adjacent properties- or cause sigr0ficart impacts. The proposed use and uuilding resign, `tn all recommanded conditions of approval, are in compl..., with applicable regulations of the Bevelopment Code an!"` the To,.-? Vista Co&munity Plan. G_ (I A !` DEVELDPFIfiT Rim'EffD PROPERtIES Decewt r 9, IJB Page r. ESP( lD l « -iftis ftem haS been advertised in jhe Dail Re Oort �+.Jspaeper as a publii; �b44rinp, the property pOSted -, an n ' ` were sent tq all Property owners 'Srithin 300 feet 6, the ;foject site« V. R.CfM�EtdIA'€TD #c Staff recocnhvids that the Atattiritn Co�aissian approve OWe aPMe nr Revism 37 -3 #, subil q to the conditions of approval, thr'6dgh;;adoptiOn Of the altt404 Resolution and issuance of a Megative. Diclaaration. Res ally ed, _ Brad t nIer City Planner BB: ON: te Attachau?nts: Exhibit "A" - Site utilization Exhibi* YB° - Intersection Detail Exhibit "CI� - Site�Mjarystkai�a Ind" Exhii 4 "' Site Plan Subarea 2 Exhibit IV - Site. man Subarea 2 -- �' Exhibit "F" - Site Mar. Suba e 3 ' Erne` "G" - COurtyard D#ail -- Theater'Court and Village Dries Exh Oit 10H" - COor tyard t">tetail - Retail Court Ex ►Jlit "I" - Courtya:rd lkxte l - Forcrilt Boulevard main l ;F. Entry Exhibit IJI- -_ *nc+ellandous Details UMbit IV - Nfscg.7aneocs Details Exhibit "t." - Miscellaneous Details Exhibit IW - Amhite tune Exhibit "t! - Lighting Pla Exhibit "Ci` - Landbcape Coocept . Subarea t Exhibit %6* 'r Landscape Gsncept - subarea 2 Exhibit Landscape Concept - Subarea 3 - Exhibit "R" - Landscape Detail - 'hea'.er Court and Vitlap drive F,xhibit "S" - Landscape Detail - Retail Court sxhibit IT! - Landscape Drrtail » Foottili Saulevard Main Entry Exhibit "u' - Conceptual Grading - Subarea l Exhibit "V" - Conceptual Grading - Subarea..,2 Exhibit V - Conceptual Grading i, Subarea 3 Exh'�.Ibit "}" - Parking - Calculations Resolution of Approval with Conditions g 'H VACARr MUD >. O,ICE I Ix}f Le a a. HIGH mism 'r g kw b �„�,r ;� / aetcuerta ny, walu El IQBI ,LA.M,_w ,• M. F �x,ol :i� t5li rMdG^ -x 20rm p rt ..I Im I i +=� �amru wxar vxno PLAZA VACAW ''1 � HI1/R1' c•s VACAW IL NCXZM 1 I i I ,1 c 1 1 _ 114!1 j• O { 1 ! 2I 1 1 r { 1(t 1 Y %IO '1 1�Jf 1 1 LLII i i,ii ! ii{ 1 ~.- - - - - -- --------------------- - -- Faomiw� -------- - - - - -- -- ------- -- - _e,°01�FARO - - -- -• --- ----- - - - - -- --------------------------------------------------- ----- - - - ° -- --------------------- - - - - -- 1 il�ttltl� �� �• , i 1 I! 1 Q� ty t t i i 1 4 • ! PFTtO SITE EN k K IR�M$SIA.IETC���Q ti$ ry 1E11 � w Y F. TION OF FCOTHILL 13LVO..4 HAVER .1VE. NO M CrrY OF rmm i RAND Cl MU: t NOTE. 5REAK -UP Of SITF AREAS C� DOES 'QT REFLECT PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION PHASING Cs' to `Lt i 4�1 t G J K i8 jy, i°° j tt��!! IT�, L cs ` ate- - -•r.. - - — -- NIOM CITY a i 3A%c 4_ AiVNING DWIWN E.0 -fIL P _ SCALE.- . F _ . AREA J � e -SO +-MC Et - --UAL 41 1 T P k AREA 1 n a i 0- OF =iEtiiS . '. % " R CLUA)MG Tom: , SCALE._ 1� r, A E A 1 e 9 FwaE�w. 1 TnAU[AH 10 OFFICE/OES(RN OEl ER ARE aEING < = MIT TE O O T 1 et11" 1= T(GIJ WILL BE SLOG TTED AT TA J LATER ,eL Vw ' _ R itT�+61tER � _,-� Cn rte-- °'" - ' A R r ;7RCEPTUAL SITE rLA "AREA 3 � -y M CITY P.Atvl iNG DtVisM EXEiIl3f i`: r+►I.E= 9 1 .1 Iii J i, J{ ._/�r MOM QUAWN _. 01, ��+++++--------- FFFFF •- OMMii1 r"oft" W.M-+ . f . a .1SIl M AT }RD�&'NSDI! . �� TYye1C11L PNpY!!{JIEI� r J ; .tetlRl A7>tYt rM�1taL, rr !pt •Ai �. ✓ � t = � � •A ` L SLY � L ��/ K TYMC_•S M11KfK3 &TAUS t s M7G[INa Am, NORTj MY of RANCHO CUCAA40NGA vat EXMB rs . SCAU: �� TTQIYfILi11: -. �� h1t11�M�0�ILYeR n sma STUN .two om.. r oum"Ma wow CANO" ARUM TT IY�Tau LR,t Ayl®0 cX CF 21 Rzk PfANNM MUM 0701 -02 o 12-9 -87 PC Agenda 5 'r r, i 's r�aoartsn,ero {� -ameRnsy.- ��� voce�neprez CITY OF r EM: RANCHO CW AWMA av�vucvr ExHiBrr=.--/:z-- ECALE- ' .'.,1 r° { iY CF' i �9 a �4 + L 4 A�5. 1 ` `o Q2 got � C Ir MILL, I f 7- cny cF nEM.- RANUM C-LZAMONTCA ,r nANNM DIVMN EKHIBiT "9 -SCALE: =r t � E. ILA RANCM CLUAMONGA TITLE, PL.4JMIIG DIVISION " EXHIBIT. SALE w ., :•fir j �' as �!''� � � ` � ���"'� z t r` _ • � I i Vr� a t CITY CF rte; RA14CM CTJCkNW GA TITLE:s��'� n AI UW-y DrVEM EXHW- — SCALE- .. �� `.... d T • 4 i Uy■% .JC �_ . � � L _ -. `. 4ii ; L CITY CF rrEM: RANVM CUCAMONGA Trru = r �c�ure P[ANNLNG DFVNM EkHIMT. �5 :_.-- .-I . J Jl I IT' i�Li - r1hl. CONCEPTUAL LIGHTING PLAN i MY OF _ ' `tANCM CUCAMCWA TME: tr�ii?q f�l,Cr z' AxxEw 1 7 E w 2 .......��.�.r._.Y,�,.r...; . ca�a� +� a . .— t tea• —�.�� audewaE a am .wa.os.ar a ayn+�. w wat � � ww�suxranwr•xrnorxr R.w ta'rOl 2 P MUS.R?4CrW O OB mr OF21? f f.'x4t ( /� t alriilfxtpM r ray * 2 NOnON4lsnrJSr i i.^'S.7R^ i iMt Y Y'"*wN= �ctxN+YBr01 1 1Er'�a nllxr r r..rrpx> M M *FM `,1a YGIW.Grw�. _ r rdMNCrtrt r rat 8 8� w � � wM1M�u1NKxwt utafr caw Rlax'A o ow�a wux M MR -srnMe � � w C)euc¢wi[ /ewrux+saxr x xrrsr r rem � wwea «daxaas rnrp +rcaro.aansnw y ycxara. r rat x x'wrxwsr+ouwr+wgc we!uvewwaxnt u urawr. xwxe.s+Mncut uarrmora xae.. c cw.n rrnu x xr xat O �err+rax.ouwcwuea,� » »•xos ua r rauaxwmxx� artar ooarw'a e vxarrwsx+r►•a�w w wrpcvxwwxY r r+xc a aworaxrwenay x x.•sa xrl ■ ■rrax oicvsc wwyrxra cwrrsr a awx�ruae wxr Y Yc -�wwaw w w�uatis a arrrrwcnre wtr »•xxx ua � �axwxxasaacwwn '�, 4�wcw c ar+w rtx�we s sua w wmotm-00 W W-CWIM n n•xa xet W WE �widxas raxrax. u uieoxwxxra a axx w wnx�raan.rw�x r rxa�rr.ss x x•wcaa s sera w.snw rarr rnri NaWH ,- S �., :� � 4 r- - �i,� �1,�11 4A . �l i 5�5� 1 NORTH CITY CF RANCHO CLCNMONGA _ PiANNIW, ExH[Brr= scALE_ 4-. ------------- CptMTUAL MADINg PLM AM" Z CrFY CF rf EM. f, A7 RANU'O CUCANIOKPA MU.- DI"NING Cf"RW EXHINT. r SCALE., i t �J -4,' .�-- "f- .'�� -'� *'"IP_ii►y'"��. -- Iii"'"+. -+.`. �_ �J Y�wYI. hw. awia ""ter_ \tir .1� aI 3 t j° .L[DtM w•w NORTH CITY CF 1' ! f \ E . CW RANCHO A ♦ GA: Trru.. -4,' .�-- "f- .'�� -'� *'"IP_ii►y'"��. -- Iii"'"+. -+.`. �_ �J Cf7KtFPTUAL GRADIM PLAN AWA 3 t j° .L[DtM w•w NORTH CITY CF 1' ! f \ E . CW RANCHO A ♦ GA: Trru.. E.' r Ii M- P4RK ^4G =ARK IS LOWER LPPER "AL RA-0 RE OL'%= HAJOfI - IO1,GW - - 1 : 200 ,- 509 - MAJOR - ;.. 80, C00: - 1 s 220 364 . MAJOR - S 77,200.. - ..I : 2G0 351 MAJOR'- 4 60.000 1s 220 273 SUB -TOTAL 319,000 - 319,004 1497 CARS MALL SHOPS 18.0255 50 4_6 17,000 1 1 220 TYP. A - 2 C 25.060 D 3,050 _ 6,160 F- 5.575 - H 6.160 y - J 27,950 - - K 13,050'. - - L 1.200 131 1 ..730 -4.650 1136.380y :6 FREE STANDING SHOPS M 3.850 - - 1 : 220 TYP. - N 3,850 F 6,000 - - O. 3, 500 R 3,500. - - sr 8.000 -. T 2.800 '.� 3.000 Z.5o00 6.500 37,500 57000 (42.500) SUE- -q, SHOPS 178.880 • FINANCIAL COURT '- .. .:: ,, y�"1P49Bt°� F�'�1, �✓ i X 6,850 4,835 i i,6d5 �• 22,600 AI' Y 91490 6. ISO S,640 'y SUB -TOTAL 16.340 10,985 27,325I/o PAL - I 6.000 - - BOsl:55 60 PAD - 2 3.000 -- 60 +I c55 II5 PAD - 3 8,000 - - 60.1,55 -SOT-17 PAD - 4 PAD - 5 lh 6,000 30.000 - - - - 60+1:55 60 1.4 SEATS.5 255 319- TOTA\, 61,000 - 59.000 IToT L CENTEA. 584.205 OFFICE - 1 10,000. 10,000 20,000 1x220 LOWER 445 XTIOE - 2 10.000 10.000 20.000 1. 70 LEPER �qL OF�'IC_ -3 7,900 7,900 15,800 TYPICAL OFFICE- 4 11,500 11,500 23,000 OFFICE - 5 10,000 10.000 20.000 - OFFICE - 6 9.400 9,400 i8,800 OFFICE - 7 10,000 10,000 20.000 OFFICE - U 11,500 1'1,500 3,000 OFFICE - 9. 6,750 6,780 13,500 ... OFFICE - IU 10.780 10.780 21.560 SUB - TOTAL. 97,830 97,830 195.660 GRAND TOTAL PROJECT 779,865 50. FT. PARKM PROVIDED 3,017 STANOARO 873 COMPACT 22% ANDiCAP 2X TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED 3,970 CARS INCLUDES PARKING FOR UP TO SX RESTAURANTS IN SHOP BUILDINGS X50 CARS Ii M- RESOLUTION 90. A RESOLUTION! OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSI611 APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 87-39, FOR THl: DEVELOPMENT OF :AN INTEGRATED COMMUNITY MOPPING CENTER' CONSISTING OF FOUR MAJOR RETAIL SUI�JtNGS TOTALING 319,000 SQUABS FEET, ADJOINING MALL °HOPS TOTALING 137,395 SQUARE FEET, NINE SATF LITE RETAIL .BUILDINGS TOTALING 43,550 SQUARE FEET, TWO SATELLITE ;'"FFICE BUILDIrvS TOTALING 27,325 SQUARE FEET, FOUR tiESTAURANT PADS, AND A 30,004 SQUARE FOOT TKATER. CONCEPTUAL APPROVAL FOR A DESIGN CENTER CONSISTING OF TER BUILDINGS TOTALING 195,660 SQUARE FEET. ALL ON 71 ACRES OF LAND IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT OF THE TERRA VISTA ALANN'ED CO(MMITY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER, OF HAVEN AVENUE AND FOOTHILL, BOULEZARD - APN 1077- 421 -'05, O6, AND 13 A. Recitals. (1) Western Properties has filed an application for!the approval of Deve:roment Review No. 87 -39 as described in the tole of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Develitowent Review request is refer, :!d to as "the application". (ii) On the 9th day of December, 1987, the Planning Ctsmission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. (iii) All legal prem4uisites to the adoption of this Rasoluti � have occurrod, B. Resolution. NOW. THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by -the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting on December 9, 1987, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property !mated at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boul ('_td with a street frontage of 1-2700 feet and lot depth of *1440 feet and is presently unimproved; and (b) •property to the north of the subject site is vacant land the property to the south of that site consists of an offs'e CrAplex, the property to the east is an entertainmsentfti)ffice complex and the property to the west is vacant land. ,1 1 PLANK, NC COM.tSSION RESOLUTION N0. , DR 87 -39 - VESTERM PROPE-RTI. f December 1,` 1587 a� % �/ ` Page 2 l; 3, Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during tht.,'' above' referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth_;'in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes az follows; (a) That the proposed project i_ consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and (b) That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Developmkt Code, the_..Terra Vista Community Plan and the purposes of the d;strict in which the site is located; and (c) That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and Terra Vista Co3ounity Plan; and (d) That the proposed use, ----together with the conditions applicable thereto, will" not be detrimental 'to the public health, ,safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties ; or improves,:nts in the vicinity. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that, _z project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Enviry ,ental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a K.igative Declaration. 5. Based uV:: the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. _ Planning Division (1) Any transformers, service areas or trash enclosures located near the setbacks of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard shall only )e considered when the,; are screened by using a combination of walls, berms and landscaping. (2) Proposed bus shelters on Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard shall be installed with the street improvements and shall be architecturally compatible to the canter. Final designs of the bus shelters shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior, to issuance of building permits. I� NEENTzro KLJ PLANNING CORSSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 87-39 - WESTERN PROEERTIES December 9, 1987 Page 3 (3) The courtyards on either side of Major 3 shall bave4 similar design details and content as the reltail court near Majors, 'l and 2 allowing for changes in shape of the actual courtyard area. Deslop details of these courtyards shall be included In' `-ihe final drawings and reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. (4) The roof the shall, in addition to the submitted roofing the spvjl'�Fications, be installed In a randomly stacked ma4her. (5) An accent voussoir 'stone shall be used on the entries to the major retailers. Final material selection shall be to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Samples should.be provided for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. (6) Parking.,- -along Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard shall be screened by the 1--* of j3 foot berms and/or low profile walls. (7) The street tree theme along Foothill,46ulevard shall include alternatiri drifts of Platanus racemosa and Platanus acerifolla and shall be indicated on the final landscape plan which is reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. (8) The promenade must be clearly distinguishable along its entire route thrupSh, the center. Such items as lighting, street furniture, sidewalk color and pattern, landscape Materials, etc. shall be consistent throughout'(' the entire length of the promenade. (9) All courtyard areas shall include the use of accent colors, including various hanging and potted plants. (10) The pedestrian colonades at Buildings "X" and *Y" play an important role in the function of the corner treatment of Haven and foothill. Wherever feasible, such a colonade shall be incorporated around the two story portions of Buildings TA and "Y". (11) The proposed four satellite building pad areas are approved in concept only. Future development for each building pad shall be subject to the Development/Design Review process for Planning Commission approval. � - L40 PLA41Ftltt(i C(11MI3 0 RmNlTIOH t10, DR 87 -39 - STERIi PRtYW ES December 9, 1987 Page 4 (12) The design of a uniform sign program shall compliment the architectural program. The sign program shall include all on site signage including monument signs, theater marque, wail signs, directional signage, etc. The uniform sign programs, shall be subject to approval of the Planning Commission prior to issuance of building permits.; (13) All future building pads shall" be seeded and irrigated for er-asion control. Details shall be included in the landscape and irrigation plan approved by the Planning Division. ` (14) The site shall be utve?oPed and maintained in accordance with the approdrd plans (which incluaes architectural elevations, exterior nsteriais and colors, ltsgdscaping and grading) on file with the Planning w-A si n, the conditions contained herein, and Levu' pmentlCode regulations. (15) The applicant shal1 apply for a variance if they wish to exceed the maxiw m light standard height. The variance application must be submitted prior to issuance of any building permits. Engineering Division' (1) The existing overhead utilities (communication and electrical, excapt for the 66 Kv electrical) on the project side of Haven Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the south side of Foothill Boulevard to.the first pole offsite north of Town Center Drive, prior to public improvement acceptance or,occupancy, whichever occurs first. The developer aRri request a reimbursement agreement to cover one - h0 f the difference between the undergrounded cost o'! the utilities (electrical) on the project side of the street minus those (telecommunications) j previously undergrounded on the opposite side of the street. (2) The following portions of the Master Plan of Storm Drains shall be constructed with the development: a. Line 1 -1 from Deer Creek Channel to Spruce Street, b. Line 1 -2 from Foothill Boulevard to Town Center Dive, and c. Line 1=3 from Foothill Bout,_ -- to Town Center Drive f} E DR �{�{,}yu n'V ♦,. Page 1 3) Drainrgp ea►semts for the portions of the Master 'located Pi an', of Warm Drains. ncst in public streets shall be provided pri,oa* to the issuance of building peayaits. i4) Tr is signals shalt be constructed at the following locations with the ability to coordinate timings War to o�capanoy of any buildings; a. Spruce Avenur aiid Foothill Boulevard; � b. Spruce r'�4enue and Town Center Drive; c. Haven Avenue and Town 'tenter °Drive; and d. Aspen Street and Foothill Boulevard. (5) The entire expense of constructing the traff +c�� signal at Ashen Street and foothill Boulevard shut be the responsibility of the developer. (S) The following streets shall be constructed _fact width to include curb and ,gutter on both sides of j the street. Sidewalk, street 'lights and parkway landscaping beyond the project boundary may be deferred unfit development of the ad atant property: a. Spruce Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Elm ` Avenue, and I b. Town Center Drive from Haven Avemp /to Spruce Avenue.. (T) �'/ The appropriate lines of sight at a,� driveways shalt be plotted on the landscape pt�arrs and the landscaping designed so that steam ','unobstructed lines of sight are present to the gAtisfaction of the City Engineer and City Planner, S. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shad certify to the adoption of this Resolution. VI- Page APPROY : m McPTm Tuffs 9TH DAY of DECEMBER, I9w. PLANNING COMHISB'e THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOW BY: Y Larry' 1. ftmiel, ratan ATTEST: Br y r, pu a ary I, Brad 6,u11er�`; DE-:sty 5eGretary of the Planning CooWssion of the Cfly of Rancho CucaAlong�'( s!r W-oby certify that 0 ,foregoing F�asoiution was duly and � } regularly intro fed,' °passed, and adopted tf the Punning Comission of the City of Rancho ��, a� a ��gtslar'��eting'of the Planning Cowission held on the 9th day of Pleceei5it, 1987, by th2 following vote -to -wit; AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COWISSIOM.As: 1 r g E + O zp ,za-A , f�W ass rql S Y b N I CaQ Y .K sit O�s� rEi�yp y>„ 411[$ at q Y « t Y Y g_s�' -75 Ex f �+ • B CC o J O M N V p Via„ 8 9 TL lied � L O [J �; Ll 41 �l �'1 ;i I. �-mrI:_ 711 1 .'Y a W R 2`9 AU ,11µeC L; a YY Nuo '� °g1 .i►g�F'� +�� ��tfi ^i^� �S "c��.�; i+��, �'e[ •T Naa g '''qqq g: €N- of €.:$ $ ^.fi�g °y^ $ = °• _ �Cp3a. 1-2 ° CC cO Syf� III ^ �N H�w=i�tl LS'Y '��f tl I -MU 7 dy {gg` 6) X1CC cC CC 31 L qa 09 Ste« ,.._AwYi f� ~ Y= -�C y MYC N i.Y• i Y wr•• Yy p•' S ^ 0.O.Nr �ytg YM Yi1y 75 C Y y 3p` � +p «C �� ^ +L •3aN YyL� �j y Y +a S N isw �a p� 4 + � M w�t 3` V ypL M =�',e. 4 ,1� �n 1C «! ST. l, wS~'. Y i +V�01� Y N V �e OYy 'u Z 9 �t � cbR�a. e�i° g g g'7 e.� l o u a v+$`i 3 W 6 p N$ i +ji a � Y d p `�e3 ' L CyS Ms�`o tlo. « +,qo- rs 9QNC Y =24. M�� ° Y f a 7� tl Lys R N Oe 's 4 ,32�i 8� �«.' ggNg «ot°=ri e�$yggliy`�y+ �h 85.9 MO 5 »�Y�yNS •�e�'.w°.+�°o E� L4J 1 N U J * Tg tf `a+ .vp gM rM_SMw"�f +�c6^ ,+•"r yY � X W.2 1. .+1 11i ',YL NiM M ^a SON �Ny p i Ya f �rI 'pp`I y� L sNi ° p� sV aassN ki �i?�MMtIrpC�O. Owia'C R' _.� ��Nvini tl.� Mp4 A+♦y.'O.° CYYLY +'w _C eir il�� —"t,114'" ''O.✓V iMLc L SNP ■.Y Mf°4Af IRS r1r^qq hrM +VpI lNi \!N ga lYwnC Yh t► 44K aX Ail d^ ^4p :TL i L Y OVA ?� E `. E ° .2 C '► ri zz 7N Hit a�P �Ip�3 rY did. Yv S p V LC� a.U! 3 H:°_ ' r A r. �a Y ■x a �a Y) w • N d �wc it a i I L, het • x �Cb M M 4 L w i p «pt{ Tee V_ L5 @.COO O♦ iY c .wca K .yey Z OHS NG L N N .3 4 �w 1V " �T .CU cm i+Os..C.4 a au aN to I Y ■p Y M Q �u :.g �w Y Y�3 J N N CCam. K Q j 1 g�.. TL .�3 C? U YON �'Ii aL 'N Q ,Iva� ,p.6 N Nri \LW �CN+ yy w��~ cy.N�Qra n7 N O N s,n N H i ads - : MM� tl « p, i fill; # aV a N }}M �1 Y 0 uNil 6 -.• a pYN ygg ��'»p 5... `a Z mow. �+� 3 > d` i ••,vrp = i cy +^g�' r.Oi 1N. his tit+� agg �" � ��yCrF�'44'• ee�� M2 ^� M � �1 ��.�c ��sjy� O ��C3 iiN �1 N�; .M` O■ ^w. �,y L� Ob A LQy41 Y N:p MN Lam± Cl`6. �i+ N �y � -� S. y p y 3"x s°g g wr. Uzi + ys�a t.^ l�ti 'si #.� <�� ++ ,<a� avH ti, " °a5 IYY Pet'.t " V At AM�� OC ON 3y ., Y rµµ M N N 'z N r gggayy Z pp yI W H 0 uNil 6 -.• a pYN ygg ��'»p 5... `a Z mow. �+� 3 > d` i ••,vrp = i cy +^g�' r.Oi 1N. his tit+� agg �" � ��yCrF�'44'• ee�� M2 ^� M � �1 ��.�c ��sjy� O ��C3 iiN �1 N�; .M` O■ ^w. �,y L� Ob A LQy41 Y N:p MN Lam± Cl`6. �i+ N �y � -� S. y p y 3"x s°g g wr. Uzi + ys�a t.^ l�ti 'si #.� <�� ++ ,<a� avH ti, " °a5 IYY AN 9Cs F LLI R 9Y O1 Y Y 74 y L.NIIOi � YMU +�rK yqy }i L -A *✓I BEN 2b. -H 2b. -, Jwi V} a � N ins N� OQ A V d :110, wr :* papv $ c M'M g v NZ L y S YY 4... Ct yC k ti ^Yh S� •� �� E 4V` +G Y « LL A S3 a 3.2 r" g gK n Limo s- o`wr E a- 13 r Y 2 _ 1��' PI G C As rg YO�~i. ., 14 M p 2y: �.:QN •C« G OMy Vi qw i A y. p�c. '��a{g{11 a '� +r �t °w,.�. `�` � p 11 yE np �+ �•ay -O � py�� tYNV W Vu ��F i7 6f <j I 1 {� } �I g iz i .. T-y Z. O w C ✓� !M L �. � �+ V �N �4• a Z. T j'l��R�j't Es gf E. i y p I$fI.Rw 3.2 r" g gK n Limo s- o`wr E a- 13 r Y 2 _ 1��' PI G C As rg YO�~i. ., 14 M p 2y: �.:QN •C« G OMy Vi qw i A y. p�c. '��a{g{11 a '� +r �t °w,.�. `�` � p 11 yE np �+ �•ay -O � py�� tYNV W Vu ��F i7 6f <j I 1 {� } �I g iz i .. T-y O w V �N �4• 'ia�e g yg0 i y p I$fI.Rw J i eI r) t trf `G„Cl y+,MMy� OMAC� ti ».E MA Csv� W R� 6 3 'MA + Ca~ N +Vp���ccr —ok X02 4 d V .• CLO SN1Y �N ..BOO CV y>, r� Y +i VE 2H all a y �U\ MY Cp. mC Q N 2py,,�OZS E. Y C > y �Alw L 6 Ot$ 6Cp ellC� Sy� - �L >• .21 X o V Y it S O ... O tlQQ C! aM i M�`N i� �8f H �L ryYjY{Y pN � � �.. Ors OI "C. �y,. Y A- Z � G 'M� � T t tp KY'u. �L�6� � Vyrµ.• .w ']l y�� YY� Lm tl�Y N� ti w�' N " 6 x••11 y0 V ^H Y'L d! NN L� wu4....0 Na gas 4 y � O�1M A xx p g p iYYS paYt :e Y Qi ai ` N n �p •� y ` pY �lnC O L S Y L YaN A a.Y yY BY fiY 4L�y ON 1 qp .C! O ~Y .C. . - OY ., V i , ! M i 6 ■O6 PAY Q UO«L �O �Lr ai t t01 P r .Cap C OO Y w tH. MV ^r+ G,� iq�� [Y�� . �' UNy �p`yY arm ZL ;pi r `Y VLF `SyyKC��� �iC, Lw �qt YpYy�6 4Y TVi'.. 'pmO y� gVtlC Ni yLj. rY_WJ.Y N _N�((� � y{ N �j$� ! 1= UfQy�W O� zz Z.F gy9CCC� WYN bes a (}D ce ¢Yw + FAO v YYi 4QM Z CLO SN1Y �N ..BOO CV y>, r� Y VE 2H all a y �U\ YJ4 E. Y C > y �Alw L 6 � ellC� Sy� pmp¢M. `LJNY P i F� S M: 9A it YLL MO C N N 6w QQH� Y 3 Y IIO �� ;I GD Oa � •� Y'L d! NN L� N4'1y ^•�� Nr N Q � Qi ai ` N n la�l. •� y ` � V � r CLO SN1Y �N ..BOO CV y>, VE 2H all a y �U\ YJ4 E. Y C > y �Alw L 6 � ellC� Sy� pmp¢M. `LJNY P i Ar. { tyll. a N 6w QQH� Y 40 a RR �� 'p al ` -u$ _$^ 0 OVA' Y� 33 i M�'Y y�1N• ^Y� 4vt p k °x $ofi e 4 �L Vfn P f+v y La 5 20 7 • .4yuawii y�p�oy �. _C �W p � � C�� yC Yb. U�N djy a rm. � (�u� 1V�� ��, q 6y ® V HIS IL L'O wYM� ;C+� tI ��l l� L tN.. C _N��Q Ca•" C4.. 8 : '" a — • ro 6 +u ^.'Pi ^■'bCa ■� p& �� �! Y Y� � Y�� \ G� M � y C ■ V 6 Y 8 yQ td ^V V �G L w.ra0•v V +N _ YV pM4 5!S US NC we p pe � rwiL ..A• } y{ui EL 6Y.0 tiq{�'1 Y.0,6 Cam VM •+! 3 CM p M.. V � CL SIV CNwA$^ iN�s�.l� c wi :.V r ;a ir r � �. � Qa• � y y o %r �9 .p6 p :�.:.z -y -Y .� � ZU: N c 0 !`ITMnT 11T:l T A 1TIvTTA -- vas 1 Vi' SY[21\ V1SV V V VS1111V1 \1711 v`" +.t ` ST�iFF REPORT' G 9n C DATE: December 9, 1907 0 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission U�° 1977 FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Debra iheier, Associate Planner SUBJECT: UVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY MEMNT - - request o mo y Me an use esigna ons r—=- ce Park (OP), Community Commercial (CC) and Commercial (C) to Community Commercial (CC) any office Park (OP) involving a,71 acre parcel within the Terra Vista. Planned Community located at the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Haven Avenue and Spruce Avenue - APR 1077 - 421 -05 06, and 13. I. ABSTRACT: The developer is requesting- for recommendation of approval-for issuance of the Ne4 tive Declaration and approval of the Community Plan Amendbent to c`n ,*nge the zoning designations for _ a rarcei located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and* Foothill Boulevard. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The purpose of the revision to the land use de—s-f§61171ons for this parcel is to accom ada.e development of the Terra Vista Town Center project. The site, bounced by Town Center Drive, Haven Avenue, Foothill Boulevard and Spruce Avenue is currently deslIgnated Community Commercial (CC) for the western cortion of the site, Office Park (01)) through the ,aid portion of the site and Commercial (C) for the easterly portion of the site. The proposed reconfiguring of he land use designations would designate the proposed design center office complex, near Haven and Town Center as Office Park COP) while the entire remaining portion of the site would be designated Community Commercial (CC). The amendment is completely detailed in the attached exhibits. The originn; concept for Town Center used a much smalTc- portion of the site for the Community Commercial activities. The original concept envisioned fewer department store tenants than tho four major tenants Proposed at this time, The 'conceptual community commercial and home center plan designated approximately ,half the site as Community Commercial concentrated at the Haven Avenue - Foothill Boulevard intersection.. A specific area to serve as a home center was designated on a small portion of the site near Foothill and Spruce. The commercial center and home center were divided by an office park and entertainment center. ITEM R ,',. 3r; PLANNING COMKSsfe 's� RAE AT TVPCA 87 -04 - WE-ifER�t" OPER`tIBS December 9, I987 Page 2 B. C, The proposed plan as submitted as combined the commercial center /home center to a single larger cmiwrcial activity mail while positioning the office park and entertainment area at the north erl of the site nearer Town (,enter Drive. Compatibility ►.; :th Adjoining Land Use: As the intent of the use- son si:A" as not c ange u on y en siifted, the overall issue of compatibility with ad oining land - uses has not bee disturbed. The two parcels north of Town Center Drive between Haven Avenue aiid Terra Vista Parkway, and between Terra Vista Parkway and Elm.- Street are Office Park zones and will be adj -acent to the dW1*1 - center /office park portion of the Town Center project. The parcel north of Town Center Drive between Else Street and Spruce Avenue is designated High Density Residential, The location of High Density adjacent to the Community Commercial zone will allow convenient access to residents for shopping and entertainment. '7itigation measures have been included in tie Town Center plan to decrease any potential noise levels that would effect a residential project Environmental Assessment: The applicant has completed Fart I-�. of e n a Has completed Part II of "the- Environmental Checklist and has found no significant impacts on the environment as a result of the proposed amendment to the Terra Vista Community Plan, III.. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order to consider approval of the moUlfication, the "iy'C'anning Commission a�rst first find that this amendment is consistent with the Terra Yi\sta Community Plan and the General Pi an. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing In The a y e ort-newspaper, the property posted, and notices were sent to--a property owners within 300 feet of the project site. Y. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve a request through adoption of the attached Resolution and !.issuance of a Negative Declaration. JRes ully i ed, le nner f BS:DM:te Atta,hments: Exhibit "A" - Revised Text and Land Use plan Corresponding to Changes in Requested land Use Designation 1 - S r'la ,t Q m m A Drm z � <', rn m 1 c 17 o iz D (� 1 v > to Z `" 71 O n �a A Q >m z TTrLEF X11 EXHIBrt, �CAIEI x � "�'' , „fir„ "* ":'�,� � gc � �-. �; ,^v pw..T._�- �..¢!�r� ga' �•: -a,S� ° �rs%i°"`°�7.?" J SR 7 i o., n rol at „ O to - Ig 3 tA I.-DO 041 C � ` gt eD as r► 49 3 ' . , 0 5 5 0 Iy O -ap 10 ai n�0 _ p -km ..il4 m tr A`r4QndIC a �e3dC0. —Z O 3 3 D aw 9t p �+ « d N CL tv a c a'''n cc numam. M M N C` S y s ID r+ �X � 0 =1 CL zi �7 'R ul - .. 0, d -"I Y o a a O O a a 0 R o a o � Q 0 �� C cr a Q ea 2c�8� o°, *0"2 � qtv A roA A m A to A A a tD g� f0' ww ac Cl is N V W fJl r at � 03 M an d ss A a. � a d d s FA C to � < 30 A rn to w ry; ift i t' A fl. bi a �° w V A ? rani vi — co cm IM n > > > A a < A L4 as ., C w � A a A rp e �$ '" g D � N C A ? 3 h s_ Ao LAS 0 A � cu N « C » z n A N n to Q A f S j in tQ i -"I 3 cS �D o Cs o A 0 R o a o � Q 0 �� C cr a Q ea 2c�8� o°, *0"2 � qtv — — — C A a m A A A a tD g� f0' ww ac Cl is N V W W at 03 M an d ss A a. � a d d s 'fl Z'i C � < 30 En CL g to w ry; ift a bi A ? rani vi — co cm IM n 0 A a < A L4 as ., C w � A a A rp e �$ '" g n� n C A ? 3 h s_ Ao LAS 0 A � cu N « C » z n A N n to Q A j in tQ i A J tp` CL CL z S C" D `'' Q 7 0 CL .s A CL A ol -a,< CL -"I 3 cS �D o Cs o a 0 0 o a o � Q 0 �� �to to ea 2c�8� o°, *0"2 � qtv �a a N� A A A A A A tD g� f0' 5 o'� -ns ac �— <t Ze W at 03 M V co d �.� 'fl Z'i � < 30 En CL g to w ry; >4- a 0 rani vi — co cm IM � a A rp 5 » T �$ '" g n� n 0A 3 0 s_ Ao LAS 0 o a -h tD rt cr » z n A n to Q A j in tQ i tp` CL z 0 CL 4c CL .« \ TI' ul EXHIE'i'= \� -"I Ga [TEIM: VPGf �% Gt3 EXHIB i - SCAU- r KA B lima 1, A N 3~p H CL-0 ry CAN =wW CL A ryN�0 pt Op =ry2sng mnn<a x- 1o0ia3xm�_�3u� O y�! ism '. ? i.Cn+ c 3vl7Qg A ry�7 wrt�ORiN u►y.�A o�Q•ryi�: c2 2 C < O -, y uryi c� n -itA Cy y w,. 2rysc5 A oe A"a-'m� -,rs- 3n zcQ3a = =a`�yaym �o CL s ry G a m w to . WT R y = •a '► .��.:n � ry SLR' a ..j to CL M csi3ZyF^�� oxc = Nm�M3>a� rya Q CLZ a m F0 pa to �� �� 7a 3 �0.� g n �3 $otA> s0ON.►�Ot d tv �. ea o. a �te at =_ n mtn gta � o � H lb °ytry-5 ry'. =3..s camas►��i�;c '" -Rci 3E t af°=•-^"A at °dry. N _q<3 =33 ..��— pN3�, <.j ��; R a n n n to Co ea m ,» n to 7C to N •O ry 3AyM0NOwCdry���� vt'maotneya,tR =B1Nafi�ryy�9;nt» a o =to C.� o C ry y A m y i� >m tR i' = a•m of 3 3 N j C ry r m 7 ,. n rn p 3 N eAaa �n A o N A a'� p �+< <►n 3u 3CO ntoC�'"rL 0 dw�yy'pqp��� Ot 3U Q y 07 tll �' Q' e+'a '!' + .?. "{ t'i •'�' �t C 37mAtn 3 .Cm3'?t s3A =fin Q�OK otsry v 34w —a A-a N to mA . < caB� -f s ry aiF < ° a�._O m on Q _m O'= ry H =m+ tv d r. �' s d _ a n a. -1 @'C ui th y ry of N — 's n "% �+ y = ".' sa 't art is o C -. A N a m d o _0 ? o o.': 0. n —13 CL j S9C �t►z� AO� ryNt.t9�t wtitry�sl ..���O-t M 0 C w nMrr�(7 M -ft R7N� xrywo�is9ayreY'•?r F �a »yu s• nryt�� nNy ?Hy��'n?v pO- y.aN -=.sry 6yAyoK _y6f y o t C G :. N w�. 6yt rya t ry -ORN O. :E 3 NSA a "+ d 3n'` n � N „o a "«� m �� -� Ot >ti ry (:t Cd z $ y I CiN * 3 N ry m C ry �N Q a: 3v ii lD ry tS4` N a .7 IA Q 5 A ry to 9, 07 ry ry+ ry r► es n y. _ .ya rL 3R C y Sn Z N am yt ^►' tY ::y Fit: A ,� 311 •B ry N y • Ci Ct S< •Q �'! .,-•�_, yc «ny ry t, 71� -nM Mto t . e N t a • �. * ry sa Q.tlry'+ of N N CL i4 =5 00 � --a-wy on t9tl�d ITEM =�f�G•�? .87'x✓ + Tnu: - 7 r w Nr cc O O O w. A � Vo ' �. 54 ,� . cr q� a �e�� �f s o[�-1 A C� a a— C, �, 02 d � MIRtp QiNN.Q 3 0 z 0 a c em�,h�rr� to Q, ro- 3 c Yy s c cac'- -'�}S7 ut to O CF, ^" m :0 0 _ �� '^ u� 0� 3 x 's A lyM! h Q eve d v . M `1 r r, N.r. r"CaZ 7vaN pt C= y � ' asas+�towJa�ia N VNOi C2 4A v�.NW C Z rt moo 2 tfito � a c m 5csa a A• g.x. yj rt OW >��Ot C 1C V W P ••� �i -• v ?+� 11 r+. >0 7� � u� V tb to 09 .. CU M `1 r r, N.r. r"CaZ 7vaN pt C= —v* SS v�.NW C Z rt inw w Li N 4m � IaT z Q C to of 14 to Z r► grow b Q. M t: Trny-: 416e cr / �f 3?. A A u Zf w �Q�yq'11� � A S !K C7A a w °- Cu A w R1A CL 2,a a-��a W=N7< 05 crA N < w O�QOu.p., � g cr sc,crtnennnv►A,.� A e�mi. C o t0 A • 's 115 wi,, a < ZA rrEw ` TITLE= 1 D"B1T= - SCALE, CC, > ry C �y is pAA�y�, -s m u ' ta '► z so w' �'•► ¢na+ , w 33im awA�' =emu °t e�ep n aA< co a �f tt Q' A a FIT-at 0'Z 0 j 4 � awn a � ma�lm�g�3�rt °,A$ a 5 n A 'g la --a = ? i3` Z1 nall, p�FIR �m n'«. a L -1 N w w ' CL 06 A x Awv3� 31. a c� w�w�ya w Ap nd^' no w� C s+ Z N R�•Qr �#! to —65 5 g t0 %mho A N N a �$a�A tp .� o �H 3 A'p a A w CL A Fj ' o 3 CL A� °a. —off II 1�\ dI� w 4 t - o -a x= m ma - :9W M o CI 27mmm ~may - woC7 :e a c)5.<Otnp m 3 `° H �jN�.+.. t- �w,eDa�•ra�'i$a„�C�Caz.m�rt3Tee ai m 13aO"af�'�. irTg ?ilaAA�A�AA.%�� 9� S H •b G �7 w•G NO -0ab s°RmOaD??eyi -ai'� a O. ut y► O {� ,fit` w Is to ul CL 9 arg�N.» esa �N to m�0 711 H N 'OSQ N rmirt �NNiR 7 �, Ha C a '1• « a a a to CA CA co ifl 1 N 1 � N em,► O z ^` f! 3 I' N a f` C 44n m a CG n c m F = 1 tC N '" 3 aA m p �' o a C SL o. a •°c3_o� mw —� noaars�� °re — ;+ �. CL .1 m m "eah'm'H es m niN'Ai� on to aN°1 tC�CL O 3 m =4 na m � A O A '� - tp C O V1 r a g m w we �'3 9 �• y a 2: a n, o Z N N a= N n. R N j d C N 17 3 4 w ; w m a as ;. 1 G N VA tC N. 3 a tG cL1 a at i m p ro C K a � IA — i^ 3 i c a ITEM= Mus =c C :; = cr Y � a �d to w tq t f� RESOLLrrIOfI NO, A RESOLUTION OU THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING`-COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN - ANEMMUT 87-04 TO MODIFT, THE COMMUNITY PLAN LAND U'Se DESIGNATIONS FROM COMMUNITY C"ERCIA!„ OFFICE PARK AND COMMERCIAL TO COMMUNM`POM kRCIAL AND OFFICE PARK FOR A PARCEL OF LAMS BOUNDED BY HAVEN 1kV9N!UE, TO4 'C:NTER ' DRIVE, SPRUCE AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BQ? 'YARD APN 1077- 421 -05-0 06, AWLJ3 WHEREAS, on the 9th;-'-lay of "Decembar, .1987, the Planning Commission held a duly, advertised` pubs,;; hearing purs "�t -to Section 65854,,of the California G96ernment Code: --% SECTION The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the +Fol l owl ng'�in3ings; .l 1. That the Amendment will provide foi ''eveiopment compmhensively planned urban so nity within the Pistrict that'is super.or tC, development otherwise allowable under alternate r"O ations; and 2. That the Amendment will provide for development tiithin the District in a manner consistent with the Genenj- Plan and with related development and growth mane §em6 t policies of the Citj; aki.4 3. That the Amendment/ will provide for t►ie constmItion, improvement, or extension of transporl'Ation facilities, public utilities, and Public services required by development with the District. SECTION 2; The Rancho CucatnPfia Planning Commission has found that this projFUt7w-TMnot create a significant adverse impact on the enviroiyment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on DecemSer 9, 1987. NOW, TH&EEF'ORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to 5ectlon 65850 to 0855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Cission of the City of Pancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Terra Vista Planned Community Amendment 87 -04 as described in Exhibit; -`'A °. > 'il �I W1 7 Cts:�.rtfit HO. T�'PCA 87 #IESIi_it PROPERTIES Dee er 5r, Page 2 APPROYEfia AN ADOPI�,E€3 THIS 9TH DAY OF 'DECEMBER, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF `Tt"£ CITY RMCl O .CUCAKIGA BY: ' ra-r-r-y-T7WRiel, Chairman ATTEST: k Brad u 11 er, UNOW secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duV 'and ,} regularly introduced, vassed, and adopted by the Planning Cm-mission of the, City if Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning t wsission,h!d on the "h day of Orcember, 2987. by the folloxing�vote•to-wit; AYES. COMMISSIONERS'. HOES: COMKISSION6RS: ASSENT: COWISSICHERS, �1 I ;1 vas IN x *'v - 25 4h C LL th Lu IV. Lu in cl > z tu < 11 < 0: ui uj > Fr K �. k 4- t. �gy dNO hs+ ch u In = — M: a to a i- L0�`�� L.0 C h � .• Lam" ro � � S eCU rr 4� 40 S _ CvtDc a "�. C p, m E = :13,nrz6 N6 a) V r_ 7 C L� tv - N O as E LroC L� �ti d.II �ffi LI. HC1 roams+ U Cl r- dl Cm3LOEG m 4+ i c 013 s+ L u: cu — C C E V CS. CL w > C d C W vroC4�E!a� air °s. Cy 7 L ro d � 6YQ L � LE roO.O° w F u L- a c � °C EUO CL iJ +1 lyn O r M* O E� -4)- >a F- U Av c � D o OF CL °E ...a ._ , � & 5 \ . _ } ■ } . � . 0- k - _ §c W 8 m S . £ � . « a n � 2 22 �a . A kk 03 ��§ / m � > '2 \ ss- E 2/% w 2 L. 0 # - k 0 , 7 Z 2 . k © £ S i � e� M.- . § k k 2 ®� ^ ©f j § f ) 2 u o° ° ° ` & 2 E a a m� c » 2 E ± t k k & 2\ �§ 7 7 . \< \ � £ ■ - . } /- . . � C � / ƒ Bkf y � { c Cc U. a E m a c a L m a L L a 41 ul p N U V« = eco C S ul O t tLU « 61 O« v > o E Lt « y O <� L71 U. 4O -W <Ij, O 2 co c M o mo aD N m Q W E yC L d «u$ r � $- J< U tip y$ �a ct0. °aci U U ,E a�m C v m -►. •� L 1 I ti m d d w c fl d v E E N A d c e»a w o1 L7 v II�IV �C �3 5 Iu v as ME a ME ° ay li¢ am. n CM lid ate 0. ca CD a 120 g 0 c E« E d a ° a a ° ° ° o a ¢U lio4 Ln m m aL+ L Ca N .+ N O 3.arn n Ea ° a U m d .0 +v N •> c E N u G U C m C C C fp. f0 V O i m ' L N L d C « I-m' c a. d N .0 N 61 r4 d C7 VI i V 2 y L m to c .o E 'a 1 > N t " > Q IOp m m 5 m d c CL u Lm U�._ L E c y E m « L L Y y >T m U N O M U J T tiU v Lw d O d U Cn N M .. 1. F- z C a N l�ff N L M N a m N 0 i 7 0. - zm 7 " ° =" > LU d d a. C ra u Q 0 •vj d •O* fo `a a` ,� c O O Sj w e p. a a 0. a. i]. m G U O c '_; j ) c c O 0 0 a :. R / Y 0 ul C m ro Q O'Z O 0 Inc.= C C)).N+Q C 0 O G ai u:A'' t 00 Q '�aj%AM. 'dFAwCu y wALcinu 'r+ t p r �. r 4i > of w 'C w 4) A .� .�. w O a a] � O E X 4) L u fA L L oN+.�. O.. L O yi « V N A 7 N. y„ A A go dl C- E� EE 47 V G UCA W E 0 CAN 4n U. .G •-• A 1 4) L of A L >+ 4; L d A S. A d 5.—L. V N � Ai+ Aw •iw- C.w96) rp1n«l91 'SAdL Y yaf °O U 0 N ai V ~N 7 m A i 0 CF Ofd Cr _ d V. N � m 4) C a l i A N E a vCti v rnta'" E L °e+` L y `" v ro OCw L. u >.4) ✓aN+0. 0..Lmd�� �vGOSinna; A w y w L `o C.11C 2MOOi `" zur a AC614OW a E4l ofa) -ou yy� >w 3^-w �++ro V« E V N NC1w�'CA nz dG1MO�d Q L4) woE mu>>•o °>•r- CU�NamuuMCV1C ^� >u L 10" d > L A = to Q u` E w go w rn, c A Q >� o� Nw � 4 4) .Q M 0 ...LL d Q1 Cv °CC'RQI -L 1° cgoLN i EF C 4`°i 0 u°iQ N E Mot °1 u c aA V Nro 47 A uE m >-04) cdACO.°fc4)i�©0 C10 C'Ut7 «OQHroVNCN�d�Vw.=+CN1 CV Mw s- 'a N •,p 01 1 '�- m L' v 0 'a N L yL1 L Ul Ls E3uCw y'E Lwu3 oAcCa Q)Noy o 0o E AlaL - .0 L 0 AQ0 C -0x � C cw- O C.C'O0 V O a) tj 4) C A ., •OE'.•'ICO V 4) =.X0X C �toCE� O .0 y 4r L C O A N 7' N O V Ln H C a 0 0 tC Q. C V L O Q in N A O w O O go o � A A 3 L C1 4) c_m c i c - > _rncsiE c� uNi zu«.tC °E�.�p«�v� °)CC °chi. >u v a s L x C J L N @a+rtn4L1 °L`}- 6�flaNifOOi on_mtaa N A ic L L O_ A of N A O O E c0 0 4. A L A° C V f- N V 4) t0) w C a0.� 31 m � L 6 _^ L E L R . C? V V > Q) V N « O d 4) 4f O avi C d N w L •> A 3 N 111 4i L U C 4) d •N � 4) .`+• L N O O GV7 C go olva zs 3 u1 _ _ c c y Ea c ® aN 42 y 4) 4. L° L O C 4) L V b i u 4) v u Ex t y Q•'a L'. V ..N+ �^ mss+ .P2 4) X t 4) O Z j< ,xcrC u$�Ln djCA7lco CCW =OCU «° N,c > "- L.> °L0 L V Q- >. C 4° A fo 4) A L� m� GI C p tn IEn N d N QL. m L A-0 A d,> N# AV! A A 0 4/ C M d w �Id w Q' C -'a N° d t d» y L Q p 0 rL w U 6 QT LOO y 0 All a m0 �� c u . ° at c M to d. C N. L N 111 a 43 w L A N Od A 04) C u �, lio A A :" 4) c a1Co 0 C. wO =A O Q) GQC L 4, yc) O E Np d« 3 N> ° u fl.0 c E�. dam: 0 CC., o °roC OMN°wmC U I A u 43 >. _ xm E It O F- av�3E )— O z C w rR Lu N ' 1� Q N mLu a N ,T:D -o 0 d cn {ems.! E N M 4 Oai W Z Q ID t0 [4 N aa_ Ci M co N M N N ?Ul Uf Ui 1. Ml4�� N cuaS 0 S. Of We i] = N ... E cc M n t4 47 N O N S ID m�to ^µ`.1 c;1 t4 n ? iPP44YYff 3 i' C9 /D O C) ? to zaa° .-C4 14 .N c a, M L V L L N¢ to cbp n N lac) v N 4) d U O b ci L U Q 4T 1� ;n at U Q U Q j ^ a =) m d $ in Q ,?„ V co IL .D ®tea^ . .r "aro a Z' 0 L°NGmin x =t:E p ou.4t0 o CL - m� m Nit QI c � Q C4 In Q _ 73 Lt=d i ~ L ago a, N J N y OC ,C ce C 9 C 4:, = _ J3 d d LU -aa tnawV$s W dE7 3 O"o c � a w cn(n M w �5 fA O Co O i cc l It! O O O CD "I e! rv0 C! S ID m�to ^µ`.1 c;1 t4 n ? iPP44YYff O. •Q1 tV?V4 t� Om st .- ? to tv � M V V p'y d U c w v NCO • va L. x `m �o U m d $ � IL .D L IV Ji E C a Z' 0 L°NGmin x =t:E p ou.4t0 o CL - m� m N >- �dja U� �V Q _ 73 Lt=d i ~ L Q Q to 0 ce C 9 C 4:, = _ J3 C tg yy to LU tnawV$s 0 o w X S� Xtll Q o u a� E- �iUZ®CrIs� d 'nuSiR(OF y 0 z .r c W E r. E i C W N Ili Ix Ln t r l ,V•CB+. m W p V,��'O'OL�o,C ' m:E sc c u 3 'O 'O 0'0 NQ m._.L NL E� O m C +WI .. E +• Edm._ OumEMmMcicO.. j f �• i to, y � m� O V v'= 7 gV 6L1 .G =W C tp� m CmCOy30�C W�wC LCWAL C'O Y.C'p w OLN y V m ., Lao > in CD t>p m E. .LC y V S C `� 'ar ++ m O O W O.C.- G.0 j S 01" o m w L a"' O W u'IM E N WOc tz_ A L C m c t 0 pin m C m .O a T3 W O C r L H a. O N m O W U L R Q• + L. tp L O O T m W C — m N^ L CrnUo"'3 yWW& -O)M Oc mCDm 370 O. LL Wm�E W c U3 L Ww... W aA[ GO�ti- >N Vp C W O W Q,Op CYlO =��L i �V,Q W 3� W O W E= W� o C L °, E Q_ M Cl, b� y r 0 tD w.0 L ION p V- r o L O G L d U. �. N .— M 4) to m � N ti E .°+ N; EEW"E UcmccLUcax 1' = oia�iY3aEioo�m 3a..ctWtNa Lti7 Q0—uc [ W m•�'om L W C m Cm C'8mW«L —LrUJ A -LEL OCf mL ��,C'F'a+ 0 >C N G Q O W m W i 0.00 F CUi = L W °�' r9 m C CH E > rL.+ N m> C~ 'a W W C� G a� C. N_� L L3 im�aci 'n V N"rO_ _ cC V m uyy y =_ Gum p W W d'> _C ����mW «+ C�iO.,YU� titirW wCD.M.0CC3 N L d�''N'5 o m cm c °'°' �CNf -..N W� Cuomo «flC HC Ra>iLA3W= �o�> -Kro >aci°' '�'�F� ooY --m°�3 m v„d[ -in _U «� �_° m o> ai LU[n,nW�eCOt,;CV cQ> L L W C V -o yEai «j v N- u i m - a tp W v�=«�� w N c m N E Oti 0 E >°°A_ ma G_ _ O 'C 7 W o U O W W .•C•i i G >= L .+ G. "R ... N a:+ ifl E[ o— OO O 5Z W .L m rJ C ' O to Q> 0 y—• y Au p.° N m W .0 �.•• p L U GN c°coc.cu to u � = "' O WIl. C N L. W•_. L u C C v Wj n4m � .Na W .a yW, yL. � A p W =0 N._ W 31i m «C "0 U E ,E C1 E O E._ M c,cW W... mt- o Lc a m O #caw d7 E m °' H ow b m Moo `_� u m t? u�� c C u- � W'•' ,L +. W - tn' 0 0 C M a 0 V� W c C L> E p N O V ill Cn W� [ p W O '0 'p Y U.C:_=._u E E[ E H` d N rNj W i7 E E W V L W — E > L a. 'U {... W L sW. d _= m W j N L tL�' L > w C "6 W u'0 0— i m WZ OU 0 0 > O— p J'a U ° t C iO� ' a ri U > :n C n m V C s yslu C 11 r.E _2 C'0 . � c c d'- ti .[ ,`• tC t J Lr r. 7 r[ S' .� =.0 j 0 z .r c W E r. E i C W N Ili Ix Ln t i rn «. `c Ln cJ v.. C.77 w N �3 C. In LA,a. Ul 0 in m w U a+ Allk A N'� m .0 N � G N • N ,} 3 d p .�y � C u C e N � O An /J Im O O ♦+ of ttj 1\ Ul d QI d N 0) y N �.. 4 w0+ LL U ° N ILA N N V aLi Ld 4. N A 0) N y N N N m ++ L A •3 o - L v �+ c F L ¢ L O N in 3p� V 4) » E N N L L O' N N C C N H C O a�i O r+ O �' C. N O L N 3 Ci C V J to E A O E N U .A C N 0) IIA In E > � m d y C 61 d d m o .0 'a „ a a. >o�,vN N 4) vi O -v $► L U C, N o -- ��+Lp d .0 3 !4 E L 07 M.- L •C O O �= A- A �� d « Ccno' >– UG1m >OUcn�nu:a ac.n.�cnat- C�xU�xF- N C N W— m � C . O y C: a :+ ifi. G N U O th L L y A a+ er 6...3t m RIM L Y L- ' w A C O R O A h Q7 Qt ++ d '� m A N A N A.. C a L 0) 07 Qo d N h�+QNMC'*A 0.00S =- mv�dLO�Gy A d. 6Lt `� Qi "�' IV %I A O tn d. rZA+ y ` G. O ip C .... G R) E IV 0 U) C -.�= U OYs0rCO L O 10y3j•aX cn.5EC.V N y 6 L Ca a CCyk—-_°i� <Luw c c E c ,, E .+ I! m iu U.0 rn «. `c Ln cJ v.. C.77 w N �3 C. In LA,a. Ul 0 in m w U a+ Allk A N'� m .0 to O r C 0) E C 0i E LLI Q n N 0 CIA } N � N • N ,} 3 d p Q C e N O An /J Im O O L C N 1\ Ul d QI d N ..0 y N �.. 4 w0+ LL U ° N ILA N N V aLi Ld N A 0) N y N N N m ++ L A •3 o - L v �+ c F L ¢ L O N in 3p� V 4) » E N N L L O' N N C C N H C O a�i O r+ O �' C. N O L N 3 Ci C V J to E A O E N ..+ "- '- td„ O C = Q O L N y O �; C A L N L L "� •� 3 N ,N ,. -4- LO N L N L E > � m 0) E L N✓ N N H tN.i N N EE 80 N m IS C a rn O �,? N C 3 a 01 y C 61 d d Cl 'a. x .0 L u w ✓ L a.r .� t9 N C 4f i tfi '� O r Si C O R�'��OOu}U01CD7ry 01Y O�"� C °, '. to C.o�L,a 14C3OO�p(�Uy'O016. !� �A f+ .0 •— �.+ Y- �,. L- ✓N.hNiAyvty� 1ELNr0 t�w E -- ��+Lp d .0 3 !4 E L 07 M.- L •C O O �= A- �� d « Ccno' >– UG1m >OUcn�nu:a ac.n.�cnat- C�xU�xF- to O r C 0) E C 0i E LLI Q n N 0 CIA } lu WWW1 DATE: TO': FROM: BY: 1 I SUBJECT: -DNGA CITY OF RANCHO CUI,-,.L QCAM, STAFF REPORT U. 0 Z ri > 137? December 9, 1987 Chairman and Member, )f the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Otto'kroutil, Deputy City Planner SAUXURILEASES IN THE INDUSTRIAL AREA/USE DETERMINATION - THE MO GROUP I. BACKGROUND: We have received a request-from the Auxano Group to cons er the general issue of subleases in existing industrial buildings, and 2) the specific request to allow the Auxano Group to sublease office space from an existing church The Hi4!and Community Covenant Church facilities'. approved by ; Conditfoi,4 ) Use Permit, contain several offices for the church use. It is the Auxano Group's contention that they should be able to sublease some of this office space from the church without a modification of the chum�h CUP. The attached letter (see Exhibit "A") outlines the request. II., SUBLEASES/GENERAL: :,raff does not ',bormally monitor subleases in industrial WRY gs. When asked u clear a business license or tenant improvements for an existing building, we simply check whether the proposed use '; , permitted use.,in the area. � -Niiidsl no modifications are required to the bUildin--r parking we then use the following criteria: - if permitted, approve use - if conditionally permitted, notify applicant a CUP Is necessary - if not permitted, deny use In those instanu'in where there is an existing CUP in pl a,,e on - t ; )*, site, additional 0MITTED uses MAY be added without a modification to the LUP, altk Ugh some discretion is necessary. However, additional CONDITIONAL uses (which need approval by CUP an6 a public hearin A)ould require a P)odifiration to the existing CU? public and a p he, hg. The Comission-in'ould either confirm this appro&,.) or providd,,,-3taff with appropriate direction. ITEM 5 lip -, -: a. �C ., °. deceer g,<. 1 Page 1 III. THE AUl B(? The exisi;iyT Higfiland Covenant community c vrc ° °t an eatistia Ioulti- tenant Pro f the northeast corm cif a dtree 'iitiaca and; Avenue. Tie site is designated ��en�r . gtai "ait Suq`t�ftwa 11. The cha r is a , conditional die a�na`k ai cplk76o�k►'t urge emit. *e - M 6r«tp w!ul3 lie fi! subyase >soma '<zi wR.e church s officee^e eir their use. The Auxano 6foup is 4 real estate brokerage cova , atm.---as such falls into the Administrative :and ,1v C;an4 o" oat"_ Olry In Subarea 11, sveS i, a. use' watrl.d requic*e a CJP. If the -criteria outlined in the . revioax s'eot`i °on are coritmmd by the Commtssion, a 5 modification to the exfsti s Chum -h CUP would be necrazsary.. IY. RECOMMENDATION: This report outlined the direction given to, uxano rou}a y staff. The Commission should niview the reed ;st and either .confirm staff's interpretation or adviss stuff - -'and applicant as to appropri,2te direction. Res ull ted., t - Br' City canner RB:OK:ko Attachments: Exhibit` °A" - Letter from The Auxano Oh' p Exhibit wV - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Location Map t 0 L� 1; .w+ V k 3. t1N.t SERYIGE REAL �i��4�'Ai�� O.W"OON OESlOW p1m Brad Buller - 31282 VMS City Planner ��Q�'Z Rancho Cucamonga AYyg�tFit6 �i�t�t� tut i t tyoar Brad, I November ti, 1987 It has recently come to your atten,:ion that my company, The Auxano Group, Is_ attempting to 9frblease space 1n the Rancho Pacific Business Park from Hlghtand Community Covenant Church. We tried to .7et a,-Aew busie-,-sss license unJer our new company name and the planning dagartment` said that wo wound naed to modify the conditional use permit that has been g,ven to the church before we could get our iicense and before v could occupy the rA,,4ce. We would iike the Planning departmen and core,I:isiop to,' i consider the issue of subleases in existing industrial a;.tcus. We, as you well know, have been very involved in the development of the exiating industrial speciffF plan and think that our case might serve tc assist other b4 inesses if this item should come up again. if a conditional -'`use Oermit has been approved for any particular usage 'and thi\ tenant wishes to sublease some of their space -a a use/ wttio woui"° be uldar the same use category fc, the spaca which th y wise.. to occupy, then we think it appropriate thatihe city approve the usage without goirg through a public hea - ^inq. This w0 d be done Fe staff review or by policy being established :,Mich allows such a situation. 2. This would especially be the easel where a ,nzx user would not make any changes to the interior of the space, er occupy any additional offices than the nrlg., ai permittee, thus not requiring any n4 ditionai parking as well. _ 3. lit our .ase, the church was given a c4nditienaI use permit and the plan's showed four offices. We will occupy three of those offices and the `pastor of the church is one of our partners and will nt.GUpy one of the three. The other office wit" remain as th, pastor's counseling office. We always intended to occupy this space during the ot:iginal approval process and since we showed four offices and were approved for them we did not think there was .concern on the city's part who would occupy those offices But we were wrong. We will not b;, adding any additional toad to.the parking since we are otcupyit.Z the same space. It should be-noted that there are always Otf-te buiidouts m industrial parks for industrial users. We do not think it appropriate for these users not to bt able to cub`ease their cffi ^e space out it they do not need it, ispecially canside.rinN, he fi4ct that they are „adding no addit ;Gnat parkIrfg, making no additional modificatio.Is to the tenant irn;cti,vaments, and not making any exterior changes to the building. ,fir `7 9m mL� AvvtjF wa 130 �i 6N 0C%CAlXN"'AlFORWM730 �X .l #' lT P1R'^ ±b+� r y�.M1 ..T — •F'r'"'F a . ,�.'#,'TF 71`*y1k\ 9R' r- i', + "y\ �� (K i } K ` k \1� S. There ara,.r.,any- cases wrtere existiOlg users are su10 lea sing their space without having to get' planning con Alasian approval anu we think it is a waste of the a4msrj'ssian's time to have - to,-revtew thase mat tars. _ Please,,,,consld� _x-;r request -tO develops system to deal with this s tivatian'"- without the r,e:ed - far public hearings w remem?>ering,_,th criteria} we have 'fisted" in point number 4 l� above. Nle, �lof cotkIie recognize that we may have to go thr.eugh a hearing an .this, matter and our pre pet reu to _i SO. ThMik You For Your Considpration The Auxano` Group ,; r eanka, t President - - i j - I i f w� dvl/t�•-ISO vas t M» o� t°.�� , • *' f 'ii5 2 0 36 v'" W � u.s o_ ."'y..� �K,,� -s � � � , '�l t �� /} �: ro.' • "• ttl4hlaria � }...gUILOL�"� `''1• lrp 1730 At1LL7YHi± 3 S �o 1150 ►-- j 165,0 i .,•r .. Cr 114• s.9Yt+U1'NG 4 6ED .. � • 115 1 n .+ _ .r •c l �- . ^l lib 416 its 4 r ' ' pACtr,c SCENC � a 1 2e. 14c, st st.DG 0 st SI.DG 5,10 OLDG BLDG 3 4 30,640 st' • c COOK. 1 tk i a fig a off lil, L f 10 0 s t n� _ A FULL SERU,CE R � I CONMLTAP,ON DMG gpp,pM� W PLPA Brad Buller �CfY" City Planner 01��7 Nover ber ^1, 1987 car��ri pM Rancho Cucamnnja tilt! ��t2t t�► 5t6 Dear Brad, It ha,,, recently come to your attentf�)r',thz1 my company, The` Auxano Group, is attempt '•;''1 to 'sublease space in the Rancho Pacific Businet5 Park fibwn Hilhland Community Covenant Church. We tried to get a new business license under our new company name and the,,planning department said that wY wovId need to modify the conditional use permit that has been given to tIe church bjfore we could get our license and before we could ocutpy the space. We would like '•he planning department and cPmmissicr. tai consider the issue of subleases in existing Indust >•ial spaces. We, as you .tell know, nave , been vervrll involved in the development. of the existing industrial specific plan and think that our case m;pht serve to assist other businesses it this item should come up again. 1. If a conditional use permit has br -n approved for any particular usage and the tenant wishes to.subiease some of their space to a user who would be undl!r the satire use _category for the space which they wish to occupy, then we think it appropriate that the city approve the usa�j- without going through 'a nubile hearing. This could be done b,' staff review or by policy being established whicty allows "such a situation. 2. this Mould especially be the case where a new user would not maV; any ,c:5anges to the interior of the space, or occupy any ae i�ional -)ffices than the originxl,,permittee, thus not requiring airy additional parking as weir. in our case, tt-A church was giverr a conditional use permit and the pions showed four offices. We wil`, occupy three of those offices and the- pastor of the church is one ot,,our par.ners and will occupy one of the three. The other nfice will remain es the 'pastor's counseling office. We ;'ildays n tended to a__., i °''�i py this space during the original approval n process and sloce'we showed four offices and were approved for them we did not think there was concern on the city's part who would occupy those offices. But we were wrong. - 4. We will not be adding any additional load to the parking since we are occupying the same space. It should be-noted that there are aiWays office buildouts in in'iiustriat parks' for irdustriat users. We do not th,,~;nk it appropriate for those users not to be able to sublease heir office space out if they dc: not nerid it. Especially considering the fact that they are adding no ad'd!tional parking, making no additional mod i f i cations to the tenant .,improvements, 'and net making any exterior changes to the-building. � � d *E J J 3 fl r 5. There are many 043e4 where ex ;sting users are subleasing their space withl,01r't having to� get pIannimg commission approval and we thIjinV it is a waste of the- commission's time to hove to review these matters. Please consider our req�Ijt to develop a system to deal with this situatioN} withou the need for public hearings t_ remembering the criteria 4ve have listed in point number 4 above. we, of coursl recognize that we may have to go through a .hearing on thi matter and our'prep.ared to do so.. Thank You For Your sonsidera.ti� n- Tht tuxanc Group ° 1� .4e f eranka, Prosidenf Adh 1. 11 1� l #`.S I1 \l BUILDING I ---4 ! -. c rt a n u ins m r n r (" w ;° N ,tt Burdick .�. ti u r Y,a N ^' F 10^ 1.50 raw o a 41 105 1660 P TH j • ° arsgm r �� r t Highland r t L t C "tlma - lr' 1 I cr Chturch -+ BUI�bINc, 1 } 1 � l I �7 ' 1_ I20 5670 r .140 1734 11140 2240 Mn t 1 r ! ~ BUILDING 3 S• —F f�r 1QE i6a0 � , 145 c i540 � YSpoC. T 110 160.0._, 150 1750 X115 1680 OUILDING 4 M N N IMM 120 416 nmc LU!� Sixth Stroot �$3i�11t`. n.. e - ijo paci?ic Business Park PACIOIC SC£NS, lHC. BLDG 1 - 20,344 sf BLW 2 - 18,6" tf OLDG 3 - 10,510 sf BLDG 4 - 30,440 sf j CITY ,i l r �,1 2k es o a ' + 40 • -- i i\ i... 71, fir`' RESFkl'NSE TO HARING BY RANCHO CUCAMO'NGA . PLAilNING COMISAIFIR - Oecember 9, 1987 S!lRJECT: 4kvel pm�4srt f a school distriot Tacili€y (warehouse, transportation/ maintenagce buildings) located on the east side of &aryl Street; south of 119th "�traet APN: 10204101 and ".2. #, Balanced grow#t,, is important to the city of Rancho Cucamonga. In kegp- k ing with this philosophy, it seems unsuitable to consider development of the #' abiave facility in a sot,ely residential area. y ` With the exception of a church, this area is now and continuing to .-b-, developed as a residential, bedroom, community. A' school district facility (warehouse, transportation /maintenance buildings) wht-,h is going to generata, noise, ,air pollution and tll�3`fic congestion needs to be located in a comm- ' ercial or industrial area. Beryl and 19th are already highly impacted traffic s, corridors and gore busses, trucks and automobil s Would only congest ti:em more. At the present time font traffic on Beryl is imperl led enough as stu- dents walk north to Alta Loma: Jr, High and south to Alta LoTr° 4* High. The residents of kamilton,`'Zircon, Opal, Amber Court, Y;,aeyard, Beryl �� r+ Streets and the surrounding area,, as well as the °Hawijlton Ranch ;complex, : ,object to this development ion this Site;; As concerned "citizens for a better Rancho Cucamonga, we ask that the Piat�ning Commission seek alternative sites`` ~' for this type of project. -�i i 55 0 4: �- %/ �..�:ra ` . ��( :_ _ F�' y . mss.;.•. �' _ xa%�° a 15e 4, 4 s >r - �Ile -7 1 "er j� 7 `iq OWL- Av� is z(rco�J due) - 6711 Z4; -Cd;l AtX� r14 ''tog, �§'R4 i ditak i ALOP eT a, '& G Y 4 � M07., de-- s � - r �a :r - LM ""T.7 Tr I � " %," 14 ieew f4 �d C)A- if;17 3 0, ` I L CTi1JtrTn CA. 91018 �, 583 81 au -8673 "!r. Scott Murphy ° \„ 12_ -7 -1987 City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Rd. s; Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 4..E. TR 13727 Dear Scott �i Y �t This letter seri=es as my notice to continue any` r' decision or discussion concerning the-tentative Tra.�ct-`Map TR 13727 from the meeting on 12 -9 -97, Further notice will be`given -_>y myself /�s to rescheduling or other matters regarding TR 13727. P2ea.sc kelp all documents, plans -pd submittals at my disposes! and - continue to accept plane and documents as they may continue to be delivered. Please be advised that Carl Xobbins, CTK, INC., AC engineering or other entities associated with Carl F -hbins have been withdrawn from this project. Si erel , Eric A. Jan ns i s r � �v '^ ` ��� �N� { ` . � ^ ` == " _~ CITY OF RANCV4 CUCAMONGA ^ -PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES , o _ v ^ October 14, 19G7 V Chair-man Larry McN-111 ^� ^ J ' " ^ ~ called , y of Rancho Cucamonga Planninj--tommission", to order at 7:00 p.nt. The ieptinq was held at Li Li O ca/vf2rnia. Chairman McN e/ then led in the pledge or "^^=u="c=~ ROLL CALL ^ : 0WISSI0NERS: PRESENT: n�,v1d Blakesley, zjzanne Ch Emer oK, Larry MnNiel, peter Tam�y-' ^ CON41SS%O&CRS: AWS'.NI: None ' � STvFF PRESENT: 8ra6 Buller, City Planrer; Otto Kroutil, Deputy Ci� Planner; Dan Coleman, Senior Vj�nner; Scott Mu Phy Associate Planner; Cy ntM a Kinser, Assistant Plllnr.e�7;�Nanqy Fong, Associ�'te Planner; Russ Maguire, Ci.+,y Engineer, Bar fiGn, .4�nior ` � ANIOUNCENE)ITS Brad Buller, City Planner, announced the selection of ry Henderson as the new Senior Planner for Advanee , Planning. Mr. Henderson will begin his employment with the City or nankxocuoamonUa on October cu, 1987, - Mr . Buller also announced the invitation to all Commissioners to attend the rwtix* train trip From Los Angeles to San Bernardino on October 17° 1937. � CONSENT CALENDAq ' TNERS. - A proposal to cot,�,,truct a 12,189 square foot. offTce ` . _ _-~ _ —' --'-- of land- — the Industrial _ ._- District, — Subarea 7, Lot 7 of tho Office Tennis Executive Center located on the north a1ue of Civt Center Drive, anti Utica APR 208-062-03. '' ' '�, Planning Commission M t�tey -l- October 14° 1987 ` , x ` x ' / .. ... � J _ ;_:,� �r �, r::.,,,i€'�. .. _,_,�. . -.,. .�; - q•= '�-,.�� -•--�- - r , -. ..,gym., C mmissionzr TolsEoY moved ai�n, oval Of the Cooient Calendar, Commissioner Blakes:ey seconded `�1��ct" ton. X0' an carrier! by the following vote; AYES. er NI 10MRS: TOt,STOt, BLAKESLEY, CHITICA, EN RICK, FICNIE[, NOES: COMMISSIOERS: NOME ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS. NONE ci-rried PUBLIC imARINGS _ 8. ENVIRONMENTAL "SSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13-49 WALTON - A cus ore T-R-CSuSaivisIN af 4, 79 acres Into "pararce s n 7Fe'Yer`y Low Zensity Rcsiden,.W District (Tess than 2 o�lling',4nits per ucr), located on the east side: of Sapphire Street, ,south of Hillside Road APH 1051- 691 -9, 14 and 11. (Continued from Saptember 9, 1987 3 meeting). Commissioner Chitiea moved to- continue Item B to the October 28,, 1987 meeting, Commissioner Tolstoy second the mot *,.v. Motion carried by the folliwi'r�g vote: AYES: COMMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, TKSTOY, SLAKESL €Y, EMERICK, MMCNIE: NOES: .nMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE * * * * * -- carried C. ENV. IbNMENTAL ASSE SMENT AND TENTATIn— TRACT 13727 - JANSSENS - A "res"idenfia su v' lon Of 12 singl-i family lots and res of land in the Low Reridentia% District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner 0 Carnelian Street and Highland - Avenue - 0H 201-214,11, (Continued from September 23, 1987 meetin,0, Commis:,i4_; -• Chitiea moved to continue Item C to the November 10, 1987 meeting, CoarAissioner Tolatoy seconded the motion, Motion carried by the fol!,�,wing vi,te: AYES: COMMISSIONERS; U SIEA, TOLSTOY, BLAKESLEY, L ;RICK, MMVIIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS; NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: `!ONE carried Planning COW. iSiihn MMir:4tes ,i:October 14, i18f u KI 0701 -02 0 12-9 -87 PC 'Agenda a 6 £9 j: D. ENVIROZ,�ATAL ASSESSMEI " AND DEVELOPMENP REVIESd 87 -14 - GREENVIEW e eve u n`T Of 14U7mu —j amp y son r acres o an in the Medium Residential District (8 -14 dwelling u -.-Ats ;der a.re), located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Dakar ;,venue - A-H 207 - 201 -30, 41, 42 and 43. Associated with the development is Tree Removal Permit 87 -62 requesting the removal o- a number of trees scattered throughout the site. (Continued frot7 `+ September 23, 1987 meeting). 3 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSILrUT AND TENTATIVE TR7,Ci 13650 � 'ENVIEW 1 ' ESQ A -residefiVU suo iv.sion inn 'es19n review 5f 14U jWnfiome units on 10,.15 wsres of land it the Medium Residential ;district W14 dwelIfw4 units per acre), 'Incited at the southeast -, corner of Foothill Boulevard and Beker Avenue - APH 207 - 201:30, 41, 412 and 43. Associated with the development is Tree Removal Permit V -62 requesting the removal of a number of trees scattered 16roughout the site. (Continued from September 23, 1981 ir4eting). Scott K rphy, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Since the applicant was not present at the vi ; Chaitimi McNiel stated this item would be heard later in the maeting. E. ENVIRONMENTAL t.a�SSMEPt AND TE& ATIVE TRACT 121722 - WILLIAM LYON 6F1F7{RY" =`!-t ��n a su �v�s�on 'of IM lots on acres of- and—in the Medium (4 -14 dwelling units per acre) and�Medium- fli$ei (14 -24 dwell.'' units per acre) Residential Districts within the x ictoria PIz -.! %d tic ^snunity, located at the northwest corner of Victoria Fare ,ane,; and Milliken Avenue - APH 2OZ- 211 -13 and 14. (Continued frc,), SeAember 23, 1987 meeting), Scott Murphy, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing, Mr. Stephen ford, representative of the William Lyon Company, stated they have reviewed the staff report and are,,in agreement with the conditions. He clarified Viat this a tract that the. William Lyon- Company Will be building thc' houses themselves. He also stated that Item 15 in the Standard Conditions regarding a homeowners association should be striken. Scott Murphy agreed that Item 15 in the Standard Conditions should not have beer checked. Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Chitiea' moved approval of Tentative Tract as corrected, Commissioner Blakesley seconded the motion. Motion carried by the folIowink,,vote: Planning Commission Minutes -- October 14, 1987 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, BLAKESLEY, EMEH4CK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY i NOES:. COMMISSIONERS: NONE r; ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS :, NPWE * * * * * .- carrisd F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85 -42 - KOTOFF A pf""'posar construct apartment units on 9.03 acres o and in the Medii „r -High Residential District (14 -24 dwe`rling units per acre) 'located north :,f Base Line, 550 feet east of Day E-rpek Channel - APN 227- 01 -21. ' Associated with the proposal is Tree Removal Permit 87 -67' Scott Murphy, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner Chitiea questioned if there was a detailed landscape plan. Mr, r,arphy responded there is a conceptual landscape plan. Brad Butler, City Planner, stated if there is a concern with the landscaping, it could be directed back to staff or back to Design Review Committee. Commissioner Tolstoy recommended it be brought back to the Design Review Commi «teg:'because of the size and unusual configuration of the piece of property. Also, there will be another project adjacent to this which will be similar. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Mr. Dor. •King, representative of the applicant, statO there was a conceptual landscape plan presented per code and has been in the review process since 1985 and -was available at Design Review. The Design Review Committee did review the landscape plan and offered suggestions - which were incorporated into the design at the tame. A detailed landscape plan is not submitted normally until the time of application for final for final grading plan and building plans. The conceptual plan has been submitted and reviewed by staff. There has been no concern or comment of the conceptual 17,ndscape plan. Commissioner Tolstoy stated another reason for the landscape plan to come back to Design Review is the preservation of the oak tree. Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Chitiea stated she was concerned about the landscaping because -of the configuration and proximity to Base Line. She would like to be assured that the amenities are located in the proper places, walkways are of appropriate materials and consistent with other projects th= s size, Planning CommisO on Minutes -4- October 14,1987 i 4 ` i� Commissioner Tolstoy moved to approve Oeveic�went Review 85-42 with the modification that the detail landscape plan So back to Design ReYiew Commi -tee, Commissioner Sl akesley seconded t;zi motion. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: TOLST01, BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, MCNXEL NOES: jOMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE * * * * * * -- carried 0 G. - WALTON single amp y lots on 2.54 acres of 'land in the Very Low Residential District tle,ss ;han 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of �Jennet Street, west of Sapphire Street APH 1062- 011 -02. Scott Murphy, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner Chitiea queStioned if there was a trail connection on the south side of the street directly across from the project. Mr. Murphy stated ! re is no connection Commissioner Blakesley questioned sidewalk improvements. Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer, stated the 4dhoc Committee that was formed when the original thorrughbred track was reviewed, it was one of the recommendations of the Codynittee that no sidewalks be provided in the original thoroughbred track and this was to be i.ne same to be consistent. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Mr. Guy Williams, Land Use- Planning Consultant, 201 East Financial Way, Glendora, stated ths" have reviewed the staff report and agre: with th& conditions of the staff report. Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Tolstoy moved to approve the project, Commissioner Blakesley seconded the motion. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, BLAKESLEY, CHSTIEA,'EMERICK., MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE Carried Planning Commission Minutes -5- October 14, 1987 H. T'TME EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONS OF APPIOvAL FOR F ICEE x857' - E - A divi7s'55nof 131 `acres of anu into 14 ,)arce s within tTe-Rinimum Impact Heavy Industrial Area (Subarea 9), located on the south side of' Arrow Route, eastt and west of Milliken Avenue - APN 229 - 111 -23. Barrye He:)sop, Senior Civil Engineer, presented the Gaff report. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Mr� Robert Sundstrom, representing Williams and Schmidt, questioned the undergrounding of 66KV lines. Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer, clarified iha:.the,undergrounding of the 66KV was not being requested but the single strati: communication wire for the 66KV line can be undergrounded and this is what is being requested to be undergrounded. �~ Mr. Sundstrom stated they will not disagree with the added modifications of the conditions for the time extension. rChairman McNiel closed the pubiijc hearing. C=7n ssioner Chitiea moved to 1pprove the resolution with the approval of the applicant to include�� the u- 'dergrounding of the utilities. Commissioner Emeri.k seconded; the motion v i Motion carried b, the J following vote: AuES: CHITIEA, EMER1'GK, BLAKESLEY, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: NONE ASSENT: NONE * * * * -- carried I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ,AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13579 - AYOUB - A mu i- amp y —residential evelopment ctimprfsing of units on .69 ;:-res of land in the Medium Residential District (8 -14 dwelling units per acre), located on the east aide of Hellman Avenue, 325 feet north of 19th Street - APN 201- 474 -12. Debra Meier, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner Chitiea questioned whether the perimeter wall_ match the adjoining developments and if there is a decorative finish on the front porch galls. She did not feel cinder block in the front was not appropriate, it should have a matching stucco cover and a cap and be consistent on the interior within the project itself. She stated she is Planning Commission Minutes -6- October 14 , 1987 Brad Buller, City Planner„ summarized the major concerns of the Commission stating the amount of hardscape that abuts the property, especially to the south' and along the alleyway of the driveway to thea garages. Staff would work with the applicant on inpreasing the width of the planted areas to allow some more significant landscaping. Commissioner 176stoy agreed with Mr. Buller and peiterated that there was just too much project for the property, Brad Buller, City Pl:,nner, stated the north and south faces of the building closest to the street as well as the interior alleyway court faces of the project could be softened through landscaping. 6 Nanning Commission Minutes October 14, 1967 i s particularly concerned with the front,poition with a decorative finish and feels that stucco would be most appropriate. 11. .._.Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing, E 1 � Mr. Richard Ayoub, owner of the project, stated he is in agreement with 1. the staff report. He agreed with Commissioner Chitiea's recommendation about putting up cinder block and stuccoing it. a Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. ; .' Commissioner Blakesley expressed his concern about the amount of� hardscape and drive between the two buildings and the sound attenuation. He was con.�,rned there is Very little room for landscaping. Commissioner Tolstoy' stated that some language' be put in the requirevents so that the wall situation is taken care of to the satisfaction of the City Planner. In his opinion, Mr. ,lolstoy stated he did not feel it was a very good project as the dzveloper has tried to, f overdevelop the piece of property, , Commissioner CK�+.iea expressed her concerns regarding the massive amt,unt of hardscape; in relation to the landscape, Also the balconies extend right over the asphalt and this would not seems to be appealing as the asphalt generates a great. decl ,crF) heat. Commissioner Emerick commented on the lack of landscaping that grows H urright to the sky and the expansive concrete to the south. he is also concerned about the emergency fire ai:cess to the north whisk means there will be no landscaping in that access. It will be open for fire truck access. He would like to see the intensity of use dropped and the design reviewed with a little more landscaping. " Commissioner Chitiea stated the site plan and the landscaping needs to be readdressed but the basic concerns regarding the architectual issues have been met. Brad Buller, City Planner„ summarized the major concerns of the Commission stating the amount of hardscape that abuts the property, especially to the south' and along the alleyway of the driveway to thea garages. Staff would work with the applicant on inpreasing the width of the planted areas to allow some more significant landscaping. Commissioner 176stoy agreed with Mr. Buller and peiterated that there was just too much project for the property, Brad Buller, City Pl:,nner, stated the north and south faces of the building closest to the street as well as the interior alleyway court faces of the project could be softened through landscaping. 6 Nanning Commission Minutes October 14, 1967 i Mr. Richard Ayoub, applicant, indicated he would agree with the continuance of this item. Chairman McHiel reopened the public heaving. Commissioner Emerick moved ^ 4ontinue this project to the November 10„ 1987, 4 :00 'p.m.• and in., die interim refer it to Design Review for further comment and review. Commissioner Tolstoy seconded the motion. Notion Carried by the following vote:-, AYES: COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK, TOLSTOY, BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS:. NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE * * * * * * -- carried 8:07 P.M. -- Planning Commission Recess.d 8:22 P.M. Planning Commission Reconvened J. City of anc�T-u urcamonga Ordinance 21,1, to revise Section 17.12.040 pert,ai.ning to upgrade of parking allocation standards and to requite enclased garages for all apartment and condominium projects; and, to revise Section 17,08.090 pertaining to upgrade of General Design Guidelines for parking areas in multiple family developments; and, to revise Section 17.0$.040 pertaining to upgrade of minimum r0sidential unit size. Alan Warren, Astaciate Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman McNiei opened the public hearing. Mr. Stejhesc Ford, representative of the William Lyon Comp4 ^v, addressed' the issue of the 1,000 minimum square footage as proposed in the resolution. The 1,000 square foot minimum is applicable to any single family detached unit regardless of the land use designation that it would be constructed in. They have a strong concern about the 1,000 square foot minimum in Low - Medium or Medium categories, Victoria Planed, Community has a siumber of single family projects in the Low - Medium And Medium category and a number of projects have been built well under 1,000 sq*jare feet. Their be:; selling homes -is 917 square feet. Setting the 1,000 square foot minimum increases the costs of a single family detached home that could be on a 5,000 - 4,000 square foot lot enough that it would eliminate the opportunities for that type of home ownership which is most desirable to the _market place. This would be inconsistent with the goals of good housin4.' ;Tactice. Inc Planning Commission Minutes -a- October 14, 1987 11 Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Emerick questioned the staff's reasons for the step up' of' 900 square feet to 1,000 square feet." Brad Buller, City Planner,; stated that the figureo for the 1,000 square feet for single family has generated over several workshops `whicL involved the liillicm Lyon Company, Lewis Homes, BIA, and tae Planning Commissinnr -' It was the recommendation of the Planning`�Commission to go to 1,000 square feet for more liveable space as opposed to the 900 square foot. During these workshops there were also diwai lions to increase the minimuim lot size to 5,000 sqeare feet. However, that issue has been put on h'yyd pending a market study from BIA regarding the market effects of i&reasing the minim lot size to 5,000 squa ^e feet. Commissioner Chitiea agreed that, the staff's rewriting of the storage unit aspect is very appropriate. C *lmmissioner Tolstoy stated that one of his considerations during the workshop was that additional space in a house would upgrade the quality of the life of the people who lived in the house. There was discussion' at that time about increasing the: average square footage of the lot which would improve the streetsrape and the appea�,ance of the neighborhood. Commissioner Emerick stated, *hat the deciding factrr,in the liveability_, of the unit is not how big 1t e unit is but the nt J"''� of people in thd - house. Mr. Emerick would advocate a larger minimum lot size b he would support the 900 square feet of the unit if that is what it takes to get entry level people in the market. Otto Kroutii, Deputy City Planner, stated the initial impetus regarding the unit size came from the City Council. Further the Conditional Use Permit process does permit houses smaller than I,UOO square feet if the Commission decided to approve this requirements. Brad Buller. City Planner, clarified that with the recommended changes they are no-., units less than 1,000 square feet but make them conditional versus permitted. Co►mnissioner Tolstoy stated his support of tte 1,000 square foot minimum and believed the Conditional Use Permit will alert the developer that his design will have to be more innovative. Reviewingg the staff report, Mr. Tolstoy 4,' so stated that compacT car parking spaces are inappropriate in a commercial center but maybe: not in residential. Brad Buller, C-V y Planner, suggested as an approach to the issue of compact car parking staff could do an analysis whereby surveying compliance or nancompliance with compact Spaces and how other cities . handla it. However, if there is a consensus now to process a code amendment, then the Commission could direct staff to do so. Planning ;ommission Minutes -9- October 14, 1987 Comm i ssi oneo�' Toi stoy felt that davO opers wfid to overdevelop a site using the compact park ing space ratio Commissioner Tolstoy questioned the issue of hang -en 'storage and whether the Commission hoc required some type of storage, especially in the condominium units, cr is it:up to the devel oper. ,J Commissioner Chitiea stated the directioo of the Commission has been that storage be provided either on the interior space of the unit or elsewhere. There was',- time when this was incorporated Into every; project. Commissioner Tolstoy concurred that,add -on appearance is undesirable but a carport that is designed with that in mind from the beginning could be very desivable. The proper design of attached storage u4its should be encouraged as well as their use for condomin sums and apartments. Brad Buller, City Planner, there is not a storage space requirement for apartments. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that since apartments often turn into condominiums there should be sane consideration for the requirement of storage. Commissioner Slakesley moved to approve the Development Code Amendmei,t as amended, Commissioner Chitiea seconded the motien. Commissioner (' Tolstoy . requested that staff prepare a report regarding compact car t parking spaces and the requirements of storage for condominiums as well as apartments, Motion was carried by the following votes AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, fMERICK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: CWSSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE * * * * * -- carried w V;. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 86 -02 - CASALETTI - The review of the providing of —Tiva en er a omen t and danciWg--in cony unction with the Polka Palace Restaurant, located at 12583 Highland Avenue. Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. Chat.� -n McNiel opened the public hearing. Mr. Bob Casaletti, owner of the Polka Palace, questioned the condition of the security guard. Mr. Casaletti stated he was a licensed and bonded special deputy in the county and teat this would satisfy the condition of the entertainment permitt. i Planning Commission Minutes -10- October 14, 1987 C 11 Chairman McHie ?:, stated; tiro; rendition, of the uniformed guard is a mechanical process that the permit must,reeet. Brad Buller, City'Planner, stated the City ;would need some verification of the license for Mr. Ca�saletti's ability to maintain control. Mr. Doug Lyan, 22477.Iron card, questioned the natG.wa of the action of the .Commission regarding tit issue. Chairman McNi ei stated that the City Council pasted an ordinance that provides control over the entertainment function of the ausines.%.,, Mr. Casaletti is, therefore, complying with the 1986 ordinance aril this allows to continue what lie is doing. Mrs. Robert iasaletti, owner of Polka Palace, stated her hopes to continue with their business. Chairman McNiei closed the public hearing. Commissioner Emeri4k moved approval the Entertainment Armit 86 -02 - Casaletti. Coavmissloner Toistoy seconded the motion - Motion carried by the following voter AYES: COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK, TOLSTOY, 9LAKESLEY, CHITIEA, MCHIEL NOES: COWISSIONERS: NOW ABSENT: COMMISSiONERS: ABSENT * * * * * -- carried L. ENTERTAINMERT PERMIT 87 -62 - LACH - The "A%f of providing disc Jacky, live bands, comedy acs and dancing in conjunction with the Club Hi -Brow to be located at 24184 F-othill Bou'evard. Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, presented the staff re;,ort. Mr. Ted Lach, owner of the club Ni -Brow Lounge, :Mated he agreed with the conditions of the staff report. Mr. Lach stated he would change the quality of the club and would work hard making it an asset to Rancho Cucamonga. Chairman :kicNiei opened the public hearing. Commissioner Chitiea questioned how late Mr. Lack, proposed to have entertainment. Mr. Lach stated entertainment would Iaat until 1n34 a.m. Planning Commission Minutes -11- Commissioner Ciiiea questie*i how Mrr Lach pkposei to police the parking lot. Mr. Och staled "pe eia�}t have. morel than .one security guard, !gone to police the inside and one to oiainiain assemblance °outside in the parking lot. Commissioner Emerick questioned Mr. inch if he was leasing the property anti stated he had some cc� terns about upgrading the property, perhaps paving the parking lot. Mr. Lach sta'ced he would like to do some considerable imptovements for the entire property, making it much more desirable looking. Mr. Coorge Guidera, adjoining property owner, stated he has no aijections to the proposed business. Staff and the Commission have answered most of his questions regarding d€br,is and the control of parking. Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Emerick moved to aoprovo the Entertainment Permit 8742 - Lach. Motion died due to lack of a second at this 'time. Commissioner Tolstoy stated he would like to some i,lhguage put in the - resolution requiring uoth the parking lot and dunce floor,-,supervision. Commissionee Emerick questioned adequate lighti �q of the park��ing lot. The need for parking lot security is heightened of them is r.t enough lighting. Commissioner Chitiea stated that entertainment and h urs of operation shOL!d be monitored. Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney, in response to the Commission`s corr!ents °-egarding parking lot lighting, outside security, or potential !lroble7;s, stated that if •t`ara is a rational 'rtilationship' between the Ertert;lirw4nt Posit and what is occurring on the site, then there is a sufficient nexus tr zira'tion it, At this po4:t, the Commiss;on has no data to support this ui condition on the site. Comsissioner -Tolstoy iaoved approval of the entertainment permit, Commissioner 'Emeric%. seconded €:he motion. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, EMERICK, BLAKESLEY, CH TIEA, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE Planning C nission Minutes -12- -- carried October 14, 1987 r IN F � � t Council Referrals ` P. APPEAL OF PARCEL MAP 5996 - DAVID BOWDEN - .fhel appeai of the Conditions of prova requiring an -T. eu fee for the future undergrounding of the existing overhead 4til ties for this project located on fihe south side of Wilson Avenue, west of 'flaven Avenue £DPW 201 - 180 -51J. Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer, presented tae staff" report. Commissioner Chitiea questioned Mr. Hanson whether the applicant's statement, that it is unlikely that the undergrounding will ever be completed, was accurate? Mr. Barrye Hanson, Senior Ci•ril Engineer, stated no, tho statement was not accurate since there is a possibility that it will be completed due to fees, assessment district, or some other issues that will be discussed in the future by the City Council in no specific; time frame. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Linda 3owden, 1441 Campus, Ontario, gave the background oa the Tentative Parcel Map #5996. �6t Chairman R*iel closed the public hearing. Chairman McNiel stated that what has transpired has caused some inconvenience and expense to the Bowdens, however, he stated his favoritism for undergrounding. i Commissioner Fherick s %aced ir, this situation farness and justice requires an exempt,or, x2 the undergr,%nnding. The -�,ily reason the Bowden's parcel map cam#,,, in 'late was because of the fluidity in the zoning situation. Commissioner Tolstoy stated he feels 'the applicant at the time they applied could have gotten ion eight -lot subdivision. The City and the ' people around it wanted tti have it rezoned and they were asked by the Commission to withdraw the parcel map, the change was milder, and they' resubmitted which put them under the new requirement. They were in good faith and did try to cooperate with the City. Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer, stated the Con,aission has the option to exempt. Commissioner Chitiea stated this property would be much improved with undergrounding. Commissioner Blakesley agreed that undergrounding is 'Important.. However, this is a matter of equity and is in " €avor of exempting the appellant from undergrounding. Planning Commission Minutes, -13- October 14, 1987 ;, :x o ` ^ [> Commissioner Tolstoy stated ',Uhe Commission does have the right to make exemptions and tk�re is a iveal reason here to make the exemption. Commissioner Tolstoy moved to appmve the appeal bi winute action an4 direct staff to bring back an approval resolution 'Por adoption at the NOES:, C0IMISSJONERS: CHITIE8, M:NDI ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ' a1nmun McN1el and Commissioner Chi1iem clarified their no votes for the reasons stated in discussion. ^ 0^ ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPKENT REVIEW 87-14 - GREENVIEW ESTATES T1w_ development of 1AU multi-tamily units on 'u-15 acres — o -Ta—nff i ihe Medium Residential '��Jstrict (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located at the southeast corner of Fijothill Boulevard and Baker Avenue - APR 207-201-30, 41, 42 and 43. Associated with the developmeat is Tree Removal Permit 87-62 requesting t removal of a number of trees scattered throughout the site. (�160ntinued from September 23, 1937 meeting). ERVIRO.qMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13650 - GREENVIEW ESTATES - A residential subdivision and design re of TUwfiff5me units on 10.15 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Baker Avenue - APN 207-201-30, 41, 42 and 43. Associated with the development is Tree Removal Permit 87,62 requesting the removal of a number of trees scattered throughout the site. (Continued from September 23, 1987 meeting). The ` Mr' Colter Winn representative of Greenview Estates, the *9p|1uant is in agreem.it with the staff report and have no objection to the conditions stated therein, ' Chairman MoNiel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Chitiea stated the tower seems to project too high above the rest of the building. She also questioned if the mobile home park adjacent to the site was taken into consideration with rer�y to t�� landscape treatment. - � Scott Murphy, Associate Planner, stated dense planting the prope ty line would be provided as a buffer zone between tho'! tw and the � RannIog Commission Minutes -14- October 14, 19817 .� . , —' P � eta final landscape plan would provide details as to what type of solid buffer, Commissioner Tolstuy stated that he felt the recreation building is out of scale with the rest of the project and suggested that staff and thw architect work out the problems. This could then come back to Design Review as a Consent Calendar item, Commissioner ii4s,toy moved that DR 87-14 be approved as modified wSth the staggestons of the Comrmission. Commissioner Blakesley seconded the =motion. Commissioner Emeriok stated he wonted the minutes to reflect some emphasis be on the screening of the bards-.ape areas. Chairman McNiel reopened the public hearing. Mr. Finn statW the purpose of the tower was to be seen as a nigFttime function as well as "t daytime one and the interior lighting aswc,s of the space just tit give it some definition. Also, the entry is going to be defined by an overhead plane of trellises to stork with.. the landscaping. Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. motion for approval of OR 57.34 was carried by the following vota: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, BLAK£SLEY, CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NOME ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE * * * * * -- carried Comsmissi.mer Tolstoy moved approval of the Tentative Tract 13654 Greenview Estates, Commissioner Emerick seconded the motion. Motion . carried as follows: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, EMERICK, BLAKESLEY, CRAIEA, MCNIEL HOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE * * * * * * __carried OLD BUSINESS M. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 8¢-28 HUMPHIEY TRUCKING - A review, of compliance of tne can l idnsprova or a-77Fucking firm and caretaker's quarters in an,,rxisting building on 8 acres of land in Planning Commission Minut &s -15- October 14, 1987 the General indnt ^ial district, Subarea 8, located at 8604 pacan Avenue, south of Nrow Aighway - AAN' ZZ9- 141 -08 and 229- 1il -24 and 26. Nancy Fong, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Lhairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Mr. Eddia Hail, representing Firs. Humphrey of Humphrey Trucking, addressed toe °oncerns of the staff report and conditions and stated that the 04'frame of 45 days would be acceptable. Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Tolstoy stated the screening required for the roof air conditioner would be out of scale with the house and" suggastad Uat it might be better not to do the roof sgpeni,ng. Chairman McNiel stated the applicant be instructed to work,with staff to get in due compliance in the 4fr day time frame. Chairman McNiel opened the ;public hearing, Mr. Hall stated the screening of the air conditioner was requested to matte the house look 'like an office. He stated they would consider removal of the air conditioner from the roof. Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Minute action indicates that the Commission directed the applicant to work with staff on the removal of the air conditioner frty the roof, N. TRACT 10046 w EQUESTRIAN TRAILS - MORROW - A request to delete a pot ion of a local equestrian iafl todseaterlt within a previously approved tract consisting of 27 single family lots within the Vert/ Low Residential District (less than-, 2 dwelling un•_'ts per acre), located on the north side of Hillside Road, west of H2ratt,aa Avenue, Scott Murphy, Associate Olanner, presented the staff report. Chairman McNiel opened 'the public hearing. Ms, Sharon Morrow, 8119 Baytree Court, applicant, conc.,urs with whatever staff recommends to remedy the situation. Her major concern with land use is primarily Lots ?, 3, and 4 of the tract. Mr. Dave Widely, 54130 Evening Canyon Way, resident of the tract, objected to the chae9q, because of the negative impact of the environment in which they purchased their home. If closure were to occur, the horses would be forted out of the tract. Mr. Widely submitted seven letters of neighbors in protest against the change in the tract. Mr. Planning Cowl ssi on 'Minutes ti -16- October 14, 1987 �J Widely stated he would like to see the Commission recommend against changes to the original plan of the tract, u Mr. Laurera'Apfel, 5481 Evening Canyo, Way, stated he is in flavor of t�� trail staying but questions the mann0- in which the trail was original%y placed, The trail bisects the lots whereby the owner has land or both sides of the trail. Mr. Apfel suggests, r trail be redesigned and regraded so that it be consiste�__ with the trail in the rest of the tract so it does bisect the lot, r Mr, Bob Fritz, 5330 Evening Canyon slay, stated if the bridle trail was to be cut off, there-would be no access to their backyard to bring in wood for the fireplace or. any other necessary work. Mr. Fri ti would jot like to see it blocked off. Ms. Anna Maria Janes, 4131 Baytree Court, stated the trail Is not, whare it was on the map. It is'stated in the CC & R's that the trails are f,ot to be used for.,any vehicle use; the use is :for horses only. Mr. Cary Wcma& 5366 Eueni ng Canyon Way �> stated his opposition to eliminating, the ,trails. The trail does impact some of the lots negatively, Mr. Widely stated the trr_.2 maps were available and the issue is really between Lewis, Homes a_,.g "the buyers. Three out of twenty -seven buyers would indicate carelessness on the buyers` pert. Ms. Morrow stated she had signed a paper from Lewis Homes stating the bridle path Mould be on the back fifteen feet of her lot. �Chairman McRiel closed the public heariyw,�', Commissioner Emerick questioned _ff the CommiSS.`on were approvF a change in the equestrirn trail consistent: with the applicants des're, the Commission could rot impair private deed r strictions. W%1 d the private deed restrictions be in fore a and in effect? Ralph Hanson, Deputy City\Attorney, stated there was a property right to the residents in the tract. There is a condition of the resolution. mak%q this action? conditional upon the 100 perpent approval of all the' resideats. Commissioner Chitiea stated she fi't the dispute is between Lewis Homes and the purchaser if Lewis Horses did not peat the trail where they stated it would be. Commissioner F ,ierick recommended that staff be directed to prepare a resolution of vLbnial of the request, Motion carried as follows: Planning Commission,Minutes -17- O tuber 14 1987 9� AYES: o COMMISSIONERS: EIS; ICK, BLAKESlFYs CNITIEA, \,MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE A3SL`4T: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -- carried 0. EMVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND`DEYELOPIC74T KEFIEW 87 -44 - INTRASTATE E r' - -ir9t so a o cons ruc a � square toot, an ui'3ing on i.b �11;ires of land in the industrial Park Dis', Overrlaif! District, located on the southeast corner Uf ia�e►, Avenu^ , -�a O vic Center Drive - APN: CKris Westman Assistant Planner, r+r- rented the`ttarf raport. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Mr, Dili Warkentin, applicant, Warkentin- Wrigkt, 3197 -C Airport Loop, . Costa Mesa, explained how they intent to screeii the air conditioning equipment, They 'Will be creating a well in the upper portion of the building which will cowpletely screen. the equipment, will have the look of a louver effect. CommissionOr Chitiea questioned if the archi`•act had explored any alternative materials for the base of the building. Mr. WarkentiL stated no. lip telieved the material proposed was the most positive way ;or the bul iding to make the statement that the client wanted. Criticism from Design Review was taken into consideration but they felt their rationale for presenting the project as it was was solid and they have chosen not to change it, Frad Buller, City Planner, in response to Chairman McNiel's question to Design Review's comments, stated the foundation is a foundation course which is a split -face concrete block. Mr. Warkentir, stated the *zntire building is ringed and set upon that base and the remainder of the structure is brick block and/or brick veneer of exactly the same type. Chairman McNiel stated he would like to see a diV-�rL-ht material used. Mr. Workentin stated this building results from an exercise in conflict resolution. It has a series of criteria that have created its form and '. substance and has a strict set of CCR's that...- Apply to the property. The issue of the viewlines into the K -Narf\ ;te Was taken into high consideration since their resolution was to 'Wake the b,«xlding appear as low as possible. then em, hasized the horizontality since the building has bands of ,rick, baZ of glass, and the bottom course has Planning Commission minut s -i8- October 14, 1987 9� even a stronge,, emphasis with a change of material and a change of ;q'i)lor to really doninapLl ;y establish the horizont;.l'it;; to the building.`\ He al so poi ntcd out the fact that from tied two public streets, that I,the project fronts ortta, yap- actually don't see the lower course of the buiidiorg or the botttm of the windows even from a car because of the height of the landsijpe berm. Part of their design theory- was tto try to sink the building as much as possible. }�i Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. _ Commissioner Chtti *a stated pr~0jection was not the color change but the particular of mat rials. The materials proposed give it a more rtm,`unfinishod look. The same effect might have been achieved in a more attractive manner by using ji lighter color of brick or some other finished looking material..,, She ,_acknowledged that the building behind this proposed- project useil �a split -face c; rete but that she was not particularly pleased with the soa,tion on that building and would not care 'to see it repeated ion this building. Commissioner Emerick stated his deference to th's issue ana-:felt the building that Ms. Chitiea referred was not zn attractive building.. Commissioner Blakesley felt this was an impressive protect ` and does not have a particular problem .nth it. Chairman McNiei stated the proposed material for the foundation.course of this bank cheapens the project. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Mr. Warkentin felt the contrast in color and the richness in texture material is appealing. The system is integrated and all part of a fabric woven to make it a total environment. Commissioner Chitiea objected to is at much split -fare concrete not only on the building but out into the plaza area also. She stated this topid, war discussed some time ago with the K -Mart center. When the Ponderosa_' was proposed, it was discussed, iAather the Ponderosa should match the split -face look of r -Mart or be brick, The decision was brick.- Commissioner Emerick liked the organic concept of the building and landscaping plan. Commissioner Tolstoy cone w red with Commissioner Emerick. Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner, questioned the color sneme, a::specially the color of the glass, since it is different from that which ,qa:i approved by tit -� Design Reviedf. What was approved is not what appears in the color renderings. Since this is such an important location he suggested clarification, from the architect. Pl4i ing C;nraission Minutes -1g- October 14, 1987 �7 "i T 77, .777 Mr. Warkent'in stated it appear different from the accent col or and it may also al%pear brighter an the rendering. Commissioner Blakesley stateei he caul d see no compelling reason Ao override the archttect`s sludgmant. Commissioner Chitied felt since this was a bank building across frovi�the Civic 'Center in an strategic and i I uportaot location it should rrot be approved with an industrial took or something less than it could be. Commissioner Emerick moved to approve the project as set forth in the resolution, Coinpissioner Tolstoy seconded the motion. MW,in was carried by the followiag vote: 0 AyrS. COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK, TOLSTOY, BLAKESLEY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: XQA E -= carried OIRECTWS REPORTS 0. LANDSCAPING WITHIN 'FREEWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY Coh,.,Qissioner Tolstoy moved to approve the resolution regarding freeway landscaping. Commissioner Chitiea seconded the motion. Motion carried by the to-Howing vote: AYES: -< ZOMMISSIOWERS: TOLSFOY, CHITIEA, BLAKESLEY, EMERICK, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS. NONE * * * * * * R. CLARIFICATION OF STREETSCAPE SETBACKS The Cw�,iission reaffirmed the current code setback measurement shall be from the ultimate curb line. COMMISSION BUSINESS There was no Commission business at this time. PUBLIC COMMENTS There wer no public cements at hits time. Planning Commission Minutes OcttAir,,' 14, 1987 `,� CITY OF ltAp�CHtl C�l,o!!C& ' LANNU COi ISS ION 3 4TRUTES Regular meeting " tk;tob.er 28, 1987 ,lj 1 Cirai r ajj Larry McRiel callied the • Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho _ Cucgmong Planning. Cokaissi.on to order at 7 ,00 p.m. The meettoli was r.' hei d atl Lions Park t-Ommu0i ty Center, .9 1, Base Line Road, ' Ranoho Cucamonga, Cal � a ^ iforn�. ghairn McNiel n led in the �Tedqe of allegiance, WLL CALL 5- COWISSIONERS: PRESENT: d i Suzanne i , Bruce Q*v Larryt Pe er Toe COhiAISSIONERS: ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Brad Buller, ` City PL;�9cr;'' Otto Kroutil., Deputy CityPlanner; Ban Cont. aii Senior Planner; Scott Murphy, Associate planner; Nand Fong, ,associate Planner; Russ Maquiree, City Engineer; Barrye Hanson,° + Senior Civil Engineer; Ralph Hanson, Depuity City,, Attorney, and Karen Kis: k, Planning Commic .l 1; Secretary. ANNlOUNCMUTS Brad Buller, Ci ti--- Planner, announced the addition of Larry Henderson, Senior Planner, Advance Planning to the Planning Department. Brad Buller, City Planner, also reminded the Commission that t€, Planning Commission meetiM of November 10, 1987 would begin at 4iUu p.m. rr In addition, Brad Buller, City Planner, announced the return of Dino Putrino, Assistant Planner to.the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Mr. PUtrino will be working in Advance Planning. k ak is 'k et �r APPROVAL OF MINUTES I Motion: Moved by Commissioner Tolstoy, seconded by Commissioner Chitiea, carried to approve the Minutes of September 9, 1987 as j submitted. r 'r Planning Commission Minutes - 1 October 28, 1987 i:6 :J �` 4 All Motion: Moved by Commissioner Chitiea, seconded by Commissioner BI akes! ey, carried to approve the .1,inutes of September 23, 1987 as submi t-ted COkMKT CALiEWDAR Item A and E of the Consent Calendar were pulled for discussion. B. TIME EXTENSION FOR EXVIRQNMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE TEWMS-W - h U114" LUMIdt-A �- A rogue , to cans trucTTn—Z-,W square foot warenouse Din I di A ttoii�' to an existing nome improvement center and the develoffnent of a Master Plan on 2 acres of land in the Office/ProfessioMj District located at 7110 ArchibalL4 Avenue, northwest corner of Bike Line Road and Lomit4 Court r APh 202-151- 33. C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT QR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87-40 - CASLER - The development of an 11.744 square ooz industrial bullding on a 1.54 acre parcel within the-General Industrial' District (Subarea 5) of the industrial Area Specific Plan located on Sharon Circle - APN 209-261-23. D. TRACT 13058 DESIGN REVIEW _-5�NdJE HOMES - Design review of building elevations and pTUT` pan i'r or previously approved tract map consisting of 200 single family lots or-,.1,9.16 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (4-14 dwelling units per acre), located on the west side of Fairmont Way, south of Highland Avenue - APN 202-211-13 and 38. F. TIMJE EXTUSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 12659 - SECURITY MANAGEMENT - A re if�dern�itlt I subdivision of 1.3b sit;gle family lots and 3 coMon lots on 57.67 acres of land,in the Very Low Residential :Districtr (1-2 dwelling units per acre); of the Et1wanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of Avenue and 24th Street - APN 225- 011-35, ii Q. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 59C,! DAVID BOWDEN - Submittal, of a Tesol'ution of Xpproval for the deletion bf a-condition of,-Approval requiring an in-lieu fee for the future undergrouding of existing overhead utilities for a parcel map. located on the south side of Wilson Avenue, east of Mayberry Avenue - APN 201-180-59. Commissioner Chitiea moved approval of Items, B, Cs 0, F, and G. Commissioner Tolstoy seconded the motion. Motion carried by tne following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, TOLSTOY, BLAKESLEY, EMERICK, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE --carried Planning Commission Minnes - 2 October 28, 1987 0 4D air m _ -a � A. HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT 87 -256 - CISNEROS - A request to modify the originaT resolution of pprova o a ow instruction if childbirth`' classes within a single family res fence to occur on Saturdays APR 1077 - 151 -76., Commissioner Tolstoy stated his opposition to the request for childbirth classes on Saturday, Bran Buller, City Planner, stated a letter from the property owner of 10725 Sundance Drive had been received and indicated there were too many cars parked on Sundance Drive. The property owner would not support the request for childbirth classes on Saturday, Chairman Mckiel opened the public hearng. Ms, Wrayanne Cisneros, 10736 Sundance Drive, stated her purpose of having a Saturday class is based upon a survey showing 32 percent of couples are unable to attend evening childbirth classes. Ms. Cisneros stated she was unaware that there.4as a problem with the parking problem from one of the neigbhors. Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Toistty sta* d he felt that Saturday classes would congest the neighborhood, especially parking on a cj�l -de -sac. Commissioner Emerick stated his opposition town extension or change in the resolution. Commissioner Chitiea stated she felt the hours during the week would be sufficient at this time and did not support an extension to Saturday, Commissioner Tolstoy moved denial of the proposed amendment for request for Saturday chilbirt?, classes and directed staff to prepare a Resolution of Menial. Commissioner Emerick seconded the motion. Motion carried by the following vote. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, £MERICK, BLAUKESLEY, CHITIEA NOES: ACNI£L ABSENT: NONE Commissioner Mcniei clarified his no vote for the reasons stated in discussion, -- carried E. ENVIRONMENTAL %SSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW 87 -43 - LA PETITE - The eve oprne—nj"`o '"o o, ivu square toot day care acl 1 I_tY__0_nTW acres Planning Commission Minutes - 3 October 26, 1987 01 of land in the Community Facilities District of the Victor-.a Planned Community, located on the north side of North Windrows Loop at Tipu Place - APN 227 - 441 -25. Scott Murphy, ,associate Planner, presente4 \the staff report. Brad Buller, Cit,V.,Planrt+,-r, stated that the"'use is not the issue before the Commission only the environmental issues. Chairman McNiel opened the public hear,.ng. Mr. Stephen Ford, representative of William Lyon Company, addressed some of the, issues presented in the staff report. He stated that when the Victoria Community Plan was approved in May, 1981 that this site was designaated a community facility, Child care is defined as a community facility, Ms. Karen Canner, representative of La Petite Academy, further addressed the issues of the staff report and stated there are no definite plans for the excess land at this time. Mr. Phil Henderson, President of the Active Committee e,f Victoria Homeowners, stated as a,community and as a board member, thi4 land woum be better utilized as park space. The Victoria Coratunity, hat lost approximately two acres of land due to the joint use agreement agreed upon by the City and the school. He felt there could be a more appropriate use for the land and that would be park space.. Mr. Carmen Angelo, Victoria resident, stated they had a petition sent out and at present there are over 100 names on the ,petition in opposition of the La Petite Academy. Ms. Becky Murphy, Victoria resident, stated she felt that the school was not a proper use for this community venture. She recommended a church or community center as this is more appropriate for a community facility. Mr. Doug Lyon, 12477 Ironbird, addressed the envirq`mmental issues of the use of this facility. Mr. Lyon discussed the ado tional air pollution affecting the trees, the parking issues, and t);e reduction of green space in Victoria. Mrs. Susan Jappei, 12355 Firethorn Street, ask O where do the residents go to oppose the school if the Commission is o',Sly hearing environmental issues. !' Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that in order , to change the designation of the land that currently exists, there would have to be an amendment to the planned community text. Mr. Stephen Ford, representative of William Lyon Company, stated that the school is a permitted use. The William Lyon Company is in a binding Planning Commission Minutes - 4 October 28, 1997 0 11 t contract for the sale %)f this property with La Petitia Academy they intend to pursue. F- Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing.. ' Chairman McNiel clarified that this is a permitted use and that staff would be dealing with structure placement and the structure design. Commissioner Toistey stated during the hearings for the Victoria P; -tinned Community was a traffic study for the complete Victoria -,, `Plan. Commissioner Tolstoy requested some background in regards to this type of usd -, Paul 1?ou� eau, Senior Cfi`.l Engineer, stated the original traffic study on Yictorl was doneeon a broad. basis and looked mainly at the impact r that the en re planned commiunity would have on the city as a whole and the Large, n* or streets. The study did give enough information to know that the NA uses pl.ahaed within the planned comrmunitSyr as designated would aii'*7�i together and work adequately. \ Brad jBulle „ ;itf Planner, stated t1vJ- cpticns before the Commission are � to 1) appr�,�;e the environmental aralysis and assessment as presented; 2► to determ if there are envirianme.atal impacts, how Significant are .`, they, and can they be mitigated through the design of the preS;::7t, or 3) approve the envirGrimental analysis,and assessment and under a \separate , motion forward the land use issue to the City Council. Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney, stated another”' ! option for the Commission would hp to deny the Negative Declaration under the California Environmental QualiiZ,Act, the applicant would then be forced to pro eed- through the Environmental Impact Report process, Commissioner TO stoy state_f strictly =looking at the environmental t impacts, he suggested the Cokmission consider approving this declaration and referring the land issue to City Council for their reconsideration of the land use in that area. Commissioner Emerick stated that a preschool is a community use and is for the benefit of the children and the future of the community. Commissioner Blakesli"iated he lilted the idea of a preschool in a residential area. Mr. Blakesley supported the issuance of a Negative Declaration for the environmental issues. Commissioner Chitiea agreed with Commissioner Blakesley and agreed that the City Council review the sane use determination. Commissioner Chitiea moved to approve the issuance of a Negative Declaration, Commissioner Tolstoy seccnded tip 6motionn Motion carried by the following vote; I Planning Commaission Minutes - 5 October 28, 1987 L ;AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, TOLSTOY, BLAKESLEY, EMERICK, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONER$. 91OE ABSENT: C-OMMISSIONUS: NONE J Commissioner Chitiea moved to recommend that the' eview 'of the request _ for alternative land �tses be forwarded to City CounG� Q. She also wanted it Included that Plar46, g Gommision is not in oppositi-% of the land use but would entertain, itirection from the City- Counc� Commissioner Tolstoy seconded the in tion. Motion carried 4y the fn7' owing votes o AYES: COMMISSIONERS ','�CHITIEA,.TOLSTOY, BLAKESrEY, EMERICK, MCNIEL s jf NOES: COMMISIZ ONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIIONERS: NONE * * * * * * .-- carried 8:08 P.M. - Plani1 flq Commission Recessed 8 :20 P.M. - Planning Commission Reconvened PUBLIC HEARINGS H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT A.YD GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 87 -MG -• TAC. DEVELOPMENT - A request to amend General an an s amp roman Low- ium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) to High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre) for 5.05 acres of 'and, looated on the south side? ,of_ez.4e Line Road, west of Archibald - APN 208 - 031 -18, 19. ( Continued fr�yvm September 23, 1487). ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOP,1jE DISTRICT AMENDMENT 87 -05 - 1eques To "amer. e3; eve I opmen r c s +ap from ow- ium (4 -8 dwelling units per / /'acre) to Higli" Resi dent! al (24-30 dwelling units per acre) attained with y�e Senior Housing Overlay District (SHOD)• to the base district for 5.05 acres of land, located on the south side of Base Line Road, west of Archibald Avenue - APN 208- 031 -18, 19., (C�ntinued from September 23, 1987). ` I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 87 -04H - TAC DEVELIPMENT - request o amen a an Use Element o e General an from Low- Medivm Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to office for 1.69 acres of land., located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road - APN 208- 031 -17, 54, 56 and 47. (Continued from September 23, :987). Plann.aa Commission Minutes -;6 October 28, 1987 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT A40 DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 87 -06 - TAC DEVELOPMENT - A request to amend the Development District p from ow- um Residential (4 -8 disellin.g units per acre) to Office Professional for 1.49 acres of land, lcoated on the west side of Archibald Avenuf., south of Base Line Road - APN 208 - 031 -17, 54, 55, 56 and 57. (Continued from September 23, 1987). J. bEE,VELOPMENT AGREEMENT - A Development Agreement" between the City of `than^ o Cucamonga ann AC Development Corporation for the purp,,se of providing a Senior Housing Project per the requt° gents of the Senior Housing Overlay District (Section 17.20.040 of tha Developmetn Code, Ordinance 211) for 170 apartment units to be located or Lthe south side of Base Line Road, west of Archibald Avenue - ACN 208 - 031 -18, 19. Chairman McNiel opene.the public hearing. Mr. Dave Peters, adjoining property owner, questioned the setup on water drainage and would like answers from staff to his questions. Mr. Peters also questioned the tree removal permit. Mr. Pete Pitassi, Pitassi- Dalmau, stated that all the trees within the landscape area will be retained. Commissioner Chitiea moved to continue Items H, I, J to the November 25, 1987 meeting at 4 :00 D.M. Commissioner Tolstoy seconded the motion. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIWERS: CHITIEA, TOLSTOY, BLAKESLEY, EMERICK, MCNIEL NOES: C"ISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONIERS- NONE Staff was directed to meet with Mr. Peters on his drainage concerns. * * * * * * -- carried K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TP.XT 13359 - UALTON - A cus om lot SUIITI_V),�M Of acres o an3int4�parce s zn the Very Low Density Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), )coated on the east side of Sappphire Street, south of Hillside Road - APN 1061- 691 -9, 10 and 11. (Continued from October 10, 1987). Related File: Variance 87 -15. L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIt,,4CE 87 -15 - WALTON - A request to reduce the annimum average lot size from 22, sgtrdre feet in area to 21,33-2 square feet in area in conjinction with a six (6) lot subdivision lcoated on the east side of Sapphire Street, south of Hillside Road - APN 2061 - 691 -10 and 31. Related File: Tentative Tract 13359. Planning Commission Minutes - 7 October 28, 1987 I �� Scott Murphy, Associate Planner, presented the staff rep Pt..r' The ,applicant was not present. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Mr. Jim i(ebee. 5707 Turk Street, southeast of the proposed project, stated his concerns regarding the flood control channel and runoff onto Turk Street. Mr. Kehee also stated the City's General Plan shows this area to be des ;;Hated as a park not a flood control channel. Mr. Dave Flanburg, 5717 Shire Court, stated his concerns were not only water runoff but also his view of the mountains which he feels is an enviromnental concern. Chairman McNiel closed the publir hearing. Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer, stated this site has limited places to drain with Turk Street the nearest street. The developer has proposed to drain to that street ap�the City is requiring a pipe from the cul -de -sac street.; Streets in 'the City are designed to carry water curb -to -curb, Mr. Hanson verified `here would r a master plan for drai page, for Sapphire. Commissioner Chitiea stated she was concerned.with the water directed to Turk Street and below to the rest -of the development Chairman McNiel questioned the comment that the site was _designated at one time as a park, Scott Murphy, Associate Plante -, stated the General Plan does show this general area as a park. In 1981 'there were discussions with the land owner about this being a park site and it was then determined that this site was not a viable park site. �\ Commissioner Tolstoy stared that the ingress and egress would be a real problem for this site to be a park today. Commissioner Tolstoy moved to continue Iteims K and L to November 10, i 1987 at 4:00 p.m. to allow for a deem ^,ion on the amounts of water and any factxe possibility of handling the water situation and determine whether the City s looking at this site. y 9 property as a park ,te. Commissioner Blakesley seconded the motion. Notion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA,; EMERICK, MCKIEL _ ` / NOES: COMMISSIONERS: tIONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE Planning Commission K-L- r�r T; carried t ' lG � 8 October 28,.1987 � U .p II M. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -38 - CHURCH OF CHRIS' - A request to es a�ab s i a c urc-h- in , square feet of an 'sting i c:dustridl compieX located at 9223 Archibald Avenue, Suito4 3 and K in the General Iuauustrial Area, Suttarea 4, of the Indu, trial Specific Plan District -APR 209- 2].1 -32. Chris Kestman, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman WNW opened the public hearing. Mr, Ted Mogey, representative of the church, stated there were no comments at this time regarding the staff report. Chairman McNiel questioned and' at's" concern witht he caVatibility of the proposed use witht he adjacent restaurant,. Mr. Megey stated there should not be any major, problems wi' %h the church and the restaurant. Chairman McNiel closed the public tearing. Commissioner Tolstoy stated t:.- back parking lot needs to be made convenient for the congregation members to park. He fell: the church itself should be designed to encourage the use of the easterly parking lot. The easterly ingress /egress areas of the church should not be used for storage area. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated a condition could be put in tN resolution to address this concern. Commissioner rhitiea moved to approve the resolution with the mod ication that the church designate and design the easterly entrances as the main. entrance to the church, Commissioner Talstoy seconded the motion. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS:. CH?TIEA, TOLSTLY, BLAKESLEY, EMERICK, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE * * * * * * -- carried N. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE 87 -19 - COOPER - ,A request to reduce average landscaping from feet 77 feet and the required parking '- setback frowJ 25 -feet to 17 feet along ,a street frontage.-of 130 feet, for a #!tea -scary project on 0.5 acres of land in the Office /Professional - bistrict, lcoated at the southwest corner of Beryl Street and Base Line Road - AP4'208- 593 -10, P'F_}nning Commission Minutes - 9 October 28, 1987 y, , � ^ u^ 0. ERVIRON14ENTAL ASSESSMUT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87-45 - COOPER - professional office building on 0.6 of land in'��'Ithe Offlocated at #eiouthwest corner of ` Beryl Str6et and on"m Line *pmd - ^r* «W+pa,-u/. n=.wqed File: Variance 8?-10. Nang, Fmng^ Associate Planner, presented the staff report ChaimanMcNiel~upemed the public hearing. ^ ' Mr~ Joel Co 409lRiverzide Drive, Chino, consultant for the doctor who is ho w sta{�| the applicant Is trying to do a, first-class building. Mr' Cooper also addressed the issue of the uu44rgrnunuibg*f utilities and felt the avpliouotwas being double charged. Ms. Loretta Ellert, 7273 Beryl. owner of the property directly across the street, questioned the parking situation and the effect on her property. Ms. Ellwrt also questioned if the zoning wmg4 increase or decrease hpr property valne- Nancy Fang, Associate Planner, there was 1 tinn from the Engineering Division that requires a "Nu Stopping Anytime" oun* or a red curb nn the project side of the street. / Mr. George Guidera, 7363 Garnett, stated he has no obj�.Vbns project ~ but questioned -- ^..- elevation, ._ the total .—."~. of the., building, the Beryl access, and the exterior lighting lct. He stated that evwnyupm has loot their views of the wauntainu and this is a primary concern. Nancy Fong, i Manner, stated that the total height of the building from the ground is 35 foot. - Mr. Cooper stated that the applicant would work with staff un-the lighting i« `. - Chairman M*N1el closed the public bearing. Commissioner Chitiea stated this is a very well designed project and felt it would be an asset to the neighborhood. Barrye Hanson, Secipr Civil E gi addressed the undwrUruundinD issue and informed the applicant that the figures he had calculated and quoted are law. This particular project did not underground any existing uti/ilims' Chairman NuNiel clarified that the aplicant is being assessed for the undergrnund1nQ° fifty percent, on 8a;s�iijoe and Beryl in the form of in- lieu foes. (l 4�� �� Planning Commission Minutes ~ lD T\ g8, 1987 ^ . ,\ ^ ' ~ ` ~- Comm0x-ioner Chitiea: stated she feV_,, in this particularly case she would support the request of exemption. Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer, stated this is a corner parcel. Commissioner Tolstoy agreed with Commissioner Chitiea regarding'the lh- lieu under9touding fees. Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer, stated the probability of the overhead lines an Base Line goif4 anderqrou4d is low with developer rontribution. Commissioner Exer-4.4k stated since the have already urtOrgrounded the utilities once, the Commission should bxcuse the in-lieu fees. Commissioner Blakesley concurred with- Cowissioner Emerick. Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil FAgineer, stated they could adjust the fee to the length that is actuallftbere. Commissioner Tolstoy stated he would support ."the .-waiver of in-lieu fees on Base Line. P) I Commissioner Chitiea moved to approve the +development review with the modification regarding the iri-lieu fees, Commissioner Tolstoy seconded the motion. Notion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHIIIEA, TOLSTOY, BLAXESLVY, EMERICK, MCNIEL HOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE Commissioner Chitiea movoid to approve the variani: -;with respect to the setbacks, Comadsiioner Tolstoy seconded the Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: , MMISSIONEF CHITIEA, TOLSTOY, BLAKESLETi'' EMERICK, MCNIEL HOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ASSENT* COMMISSIONERS: NONE * * * * * * --carried 9,.45 P.M. - Planning Commission Recessed 9.5K P.M. - Pla(Ining Commission Reconvened 'j October 28, 1987 Planning.Commiss�_A Minutes P. APPEAL OF DEVELDNENT REVIEW, 87-06 - MAR PROPERTIES - The appeal of Conal T.1 ons, of �,XTprova I re—quTel ng- Vie- p,�ymeot ot i 6- 1 i eu fees for undergroudoing of istilities along Vincent ue, Sth Street for the devel'opment Of an industria'l building in the Ninimum Impact Heavy Industrial Ulstrict� (Subarea 9), located on the southwest corner of Jer4 jUvard and Vincent Avenue - APR 209-143-13. ry B= Barrye Hanson, Senior Ci vil Engineer, presented t'i,'e staff report. Chairman,,McNiel opeied the public hearing. Mr. Ka '�bian, appellant, partner of Romar Properties,-pointed out thaJ111 0 a Icant would be wit1ling to pay the fee for the undergrounding',of the utilities on Jersey Boulevard and aloag Vincent Avenue and Eighth Street wheu the other, side of the stmat develop&. The applicant would be more th4m happy to paywhen that time- comes. Mr. Karubian stated that the BaZl;on, development has be ", exempt fot,� hundreds of feet and would like to be treated An the same W�. '�k Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Blakesley stated that a lien would br,,�n inappropriate way to finance this kind of thing in most cases. /11 Commissioner Tolstoy aigAed with7C=missioner Blakesley's comment. Commissioner Doerick felt that there would difficulty in collecting the fee and if the prcoerty is overencumbered, this would only multiply the difficulty. Mr. Karubian stated that along Jersey Boulevard that they are required to undergrcund without any contriblution, over $300,000, from across the street. Chairman McNiel stated the CitY'-tas a very strict posture on the in-lieu.", fees for the undergrouding of utilities an%i, relief is very rare. Commissioner Emerick moved to deny the appeal for a lien agreement. versus the in-lieu fees, Commissioner Chitie4 seconded the rotion. Motion carried by the following ivote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK, CHITIEA, BLAXESLEY, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES., COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE * * * * * * --carried Planning Commission Minutes October 28, r D O t $. TENTATIVE TRACT 13063 - CITATION Review of the perimete.r maT3 along East venue or an appror►ed resideetial sabdiv;�Ln-- oT-'74 single family lots on 32.6 acres of land in the Low Residential Bi_trict (2- 4'dwet!ling units per acre) within the Etiwanda Specific Plcn, located on ' east side of East Avenue at Catalpa Street APN 227- 071 -07, 11 and 20. o Scott Murphy, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Mr. Bob Cunningham, architect for Citation, stated upon review of the Etiwaiida Specific Plan aeA after discession with staff, the decision for the woodcrete material wall was made. Mr. Cunningham also discussed the block wall regarding the setback of the wall and also the straightness of the wall instead of the cutouts. Mr. Richard 'verstein, 8331 Utica Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, questioned how this compares with the Etiwanda Specific Plab with regards to the material to be used, setbacks, and how the wall is to be landscaped. He felt that the Commission should stick to the Etiwanda Specific Plan or let the developers have some say in the design and developm-t of East Avenue. --, Commissioner Tolstoy stated that w+iatever is established in the Etiwanda Specific ran should set precedence. Mr. Jerry Linton, representative for Citation, stated they do not have a problem out there should be some de4dline to the condition. Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Chitiea agreed with the other members of the Commission but felt that woodcrete was not appropriate for Etisranda. Further, she stated she would not approve of a wall that does not have cutouts or varied setbacks. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated the issues were `'t) the materials prnposed and what alternatives would be allowed and 2) if the Commission would like to see the wall undulating whereby 'there is a setback in the wail or preference to a straight wall. If a straight wall is not; acceptable, then guidelines should tie developed for a setback. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that river rock would be acceptatl and appropriate and that a straight line loots for the wall is not appropriate. River rock makes a nice relief for the wall as a complimentary material. Commissioner Tolstoy stated he does not have a problem with woodcrete, Plan; mg Commission Minutes - 13 October 28,,,1987 ii ;i Q. TENTATIVE TRACT 13063 - CITATION - Review of the perimeter wall a ong Fast Avenue r an approved residnetial subdivision of 74 .single family lots on 32.6 acres of land in the low Residential ✓'District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) withii, the Etiwanda Specific: Plan, located on the east side of East Avenue at Catalpa Street - APN 227- O11-01, 11 and 20. Scott Murphy, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman Mckiel opened thq public hearing. Mr. Bob Cunningham, architect for Citation, stated upon review of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and after discussion with staff, the decision for the woodcrete material wall was wade. Mr. Cunningham also discussed the block,wrli regarding the setback of the wall and also the straightness of th*'wall instead of the cutouts. -- Mr. Richard - 'erstein, 8331 Utica Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, questioned how this compaAis with the Etiwanda Specific Plan with regards to the material to be a;sed, setbacks, and how the wall is to be landscaped. He felt that the 0m?aission should stick to the Etiwanda Specific Plan or let the developers %eve some say in the design and development of East Avenue. k` - Caimaissio�+er Tolstoy state:. =,that whatever is established in t��: ; ltiwanda Specific Plan should set precedence. Mr. Jerry Linton, representative for'Citatf6n, stated they do net have a problem but there should be some deadline to the condition. Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Chitiea agreed with the other members of the Comission but felt that woodcrete was not appropriate for Etiwanda. Further, she stated she would not approve of a wall that does not have cutouts or varied setbacks. Brad Buller, City Manner, stated the issues were 1) the materials proposed and what alternatives would be allowed and 2) if the Commission would like to seed -the wall undulating whereby there is a setback in the wall or preference to a straight wall. If a straight wall is not acceptable, then guidelines should be developed for a setback. Ccmmissior:r Tolstoy stated that river rock would be acceptable and appropriate and that a straight line Took for the wall is not appropriate. River rock makes a nice relief for the wall as a comalimentary material. Commissioner Tolstoy seated he does not have a problem with wood(,rete. Planning 11'1�mnission Minutes - 13 October 28, 1987 �I Commissioner Emerick stated that stucco Would be appropriate. Also a decorative split block with river rock pylasters would be aaceptatle. River rock is good for accenting. Planters for decorativi walls two to i three feet of the ground such as on Base Line, this would be �r- ce�?table. Commissioner 81akesiey states R felt wo9dcrete would be bpp;ngriate. Commissioner Tolstoy stated only a minirma of materials should be used. Chairman McNiel stated there *tre a -,number of comments req,, ding the choice of materials and felt that the Planning Commission efrect staff• to work with the applicant and develop a workshop session for walls on East Avenue. DIRECTOR'S ttEPORTS R. MODIFICATION TO THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN RAIL SPUR REQUIREMENTS Chris Westman, Assistant Plari:�r, presented the staff report. Mr. Gilbert Aja, representative =for ,aim and Jerry Laird, stated in master planning this site, they becam aware regarding the flexibility and the size of the site. Mr. "a farther discussed the property size and meeting the standards of the dustrial Specific Plan. Perhaps the ordinance was not considering a narr,'w parcel of land. After discgs7; on, the Commission di mFted staff i� prepare an amendment to allow waiver of the rail spur requirement WlAn it is physically impossible to provide. COMMISSION BUSINESS Tile Roofs - Dan Coleman presented a staff report. Discussion was heard regarding the the roofs. The direction of the Commission is the requirement of tile roofs on all new co °,struction Witt; the exemption of remoeling, reroofing, and relocations. PUBLIC COWNTS There were no public G emaents at this time.. ADJOURNMENT Motion: Moved by ..Rlakesley, seconded by McNiel, motion unan;mo`�Oy carried, to adjourn Lo the Plovember 10, 1987 meeting to be vela at �00 p.m. Pi i 0 ann ng Commnissior`Adaourned - 11:20 p.m. ,3 - y ?1:.=ing Commission Minutes -14- October 28, 1987`',