Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1988/01/27 - Agenda Packet
/0701-02 o 1-27-88 PG Agenda I - of 6 /'yj 1 i C,..t4.' r S."iTY CAF O � ,t yA �1f����'.NGc , 14ih7 �T. 1977 i1 i ".' `?ESi ►AY �JA#" AUY 27,1988 7.60 pant, alai B L, F,i x%e of A' iia a I Ron can Commisi" y Mskeslfy.�.. Coinmfaaioner BEmerick \� Commfssfone � Chit"iea Cbxnf:1 loner 14IOTIeI' C-gmudW ever Toistoy ieceiittrex S, 87 s� The follow(tw Co *it Ce16'0nc r items as* exp$et i" b# attfne and I nOrnemtrowntaf. The-, will be a ate c� on bjt the L'ommissfan tit I tfrrii" ettt dis ,sian: IF' crjuns 3kgs coned r MV item, it shou?d Ian moved-tor r dfacmicm A. TWE EXTVNMON 3;OVcftHiATWE - ACT 12332 - CRM7ANO � �i ¢t�atotn lot raaic}an a�ii o loft; ati tezy ' 85 aem of WO in the Yet Lora itia r7iatri+et 4ie #itasi two &wemr>g units per aerie }s IwAtod on the east sides ot-lUven Averaa north of tine Muside Drainage ChUmd - APN. -' 241-121- B. TRACT 13444-- (DEMN REvI W P. !H& flE3 ,►t — reivew '07 bcsildsg �elaut s r detab*A site pSn for a previddWy approved tentative teach aw ciat iatira of 5fi,singie ?aziii� ots on, XU of �, wid In file Lox °1 Denasitj 3teddentfr? 7.i€a Wct t2� dweillhK units. Mp sere) witI& `4 fit' the Vieto ria. Planned Communitgil i t at the nortiu*A ammsr - otNUW*n AvemievO the Sout1w"t Yaeif a itAiir%d �. �'Pttz nT- �� k . _ .V�* Q ' C. `?VA9 EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP X31 � �Ak i�DS'Y , - A id "fon of 2.. rep at p +' % in gs' very `fir' rte; Low" Bete W ac rrelopment Distrii;t, loc*ted 'the_ o �1. Avenue; Mth of Muds ., .1061- 611 -04. (1 X, �S y 1 F J(I The "�bllowfry items am *tblfa itastrf� in wiita't canned �rdfvi xts 5 may vroice th4fY opinfon of rued pr et : Plows waft, to be reoogrofzed by tdae, G airrqon or address the Cbmir iaafon Ontliv your mme and oddrea& Au amh opwam shait,pa timited Ea mowtes ` per tivi&wz fpr each project. ! ;r ! D.\,r � UEKhtt `iT'AL AS,SESSMBNT AND 'YENTA TJ,.A6� 13519 AY B - A mut - azn m+f caa d�e� tctt .00 s�e� a� Taa�d in �ti�ws v e, tati#st paw 4wre)r Ioated ou tie ,edst side o{iloilaletuinm Avenuer Oth )tom„ .P,* 301 -474 -12, from J, " � a I. �ARNVKOHMENTAL ` k 8 BUT AND TSI�'FA TIi�R��'ACT 13Y27 h_ �WVNftt am tAP Orb u of to 1,owr ial I7idict (2-4 dilir� ' r acre), etththe e0M*r of C4W.xali4A Street iemle - A,Ix 901- 2i4 -}1. CflirtuaCt from = 1 F. ENYiRtIbFNiEid?'AL A. ItIENT kND TEXTAT "TRACT 13359 �i cwsta t 3.79 tiaras of" law 1 p""Win the I'tr s ty Iie dentin# DistrSet (low that T d�relling unfts . )r ioaat®g1 on the east epe of Sapphire Street', 'apiece of i*Nz 1061- 691.8, 10 am 11. Wbatin 4 i088) Related Filag Varian" 87 15. G. EmrfltONME 1l ASSESSMENT AND. "VARUNCE 87-15 WA 1 � t t# � AV "YS tick rilliitl lot size ii f 00 in a 'lii 21,392 wp am fee in oft in r 0641 on teitlt a HU (61 lot *"v1%16n located' on the east aide o 0 of ftpphlre Street, south of hillside 'load - APHi 2081.401.14 aW 11. (ConEbvmd front ,� 13, 1988) 14leeted Filet Tbn ative T'raet 1,3359. y c � ,., v bL iMIODMCA-tION TO co '3Di`FCON$ OF APPROVAL fli?`TItA T 190MES # ,�e� , st to M-R the conditions �o DpDrovgl to cemstruct a:%�9�4,�Iimad interseetlon at Daft Vim road and i4iiUMen Avenue. �) 0. ENMONM!:NTAL AS S MINT AND tENTA VE TRACT 12894` JI �,' L N T �- °!-to #a2 a denti# elopment o to mes ages, of land in the Medium Residential 0 Ustdot•( 8.14 dweiWi wdts per aaa , located on the nest sWe of Baker Avenue, south of To6lhili Eouipvard SPA, 207 -m-57, 5o; = P. RNMONIME TAL AMMMENT AND GEERAt FAN DM . iA A re�axeat to Um Plan lAnd . UaiTMso '�`i'a9Th rOf .� tD 'INj6%t1o*d Gamma£ vial" fors �zsate%► 3.4}S acres of W# looeted on the southwest Frooroer of Bm Line -UrAd W)d HeUmaxa Avenue - AM ESMOAliaENIvAL MqMMENT `' AND.a -DEVELOPMENT D D tT dA wA r oguest _ c w Deve tnt "- l ' M from ffL� (Op) #s h,. - NegoComnpreW (Nd) for approximately 3.45 aem of'%Wi, locatad A� fhe somthwes ner I of Base Line Aoad aO HaHma"lvenue - 40% 248482 -1 4. qtr. '0 .l'. •Lis Mid Bushmm id Q. EAST.;AVEXUE WALL CITATION _ Review of, a prod pe:3mster Hra:i elon st Avenue for a residential mWlvision-_f ` 74 ale ; atM4 lots on 32,5 acres of latsct' 'tise f ew niial nistrict (2-4 dweliin unite per acre) of the Etiwa,nda' Si:ecitic Dian, laeetecl on the east sine of lostvenate a# Catsi S *react �. t AP 227- ti7147, ".l sou? 20. L CCINDY'1'IONAi, u P mm 84-28 w HtMpny TRU'Gltii review of compliance o the condit ons o sgpm o a; true ci. firm and carotake0s c�iartem in an existing buiift" 8 acres f lain tho,:Genersi rndtmtrw District, ftaarea 8, ioi6g,ted at 8e()4 an Avenue, 'scuth of Arrow ,fthvr� - AM 228 - 141-08 and T-151 24 and 26. Vail Dkeetor!aa g ,} S. EMMETT WAr, STREET VACA17ON - y11T rOHOUe& - Lcacatad-•= n r> betwamSumiii—tAvenuev TractI15410 i a T, SIGN QARIT ANGE Review higges M"ber of , ornmericae..,�. 1. I� ERVSRt9kMENTl1£� %alW ASn ' YJSE PERMIT. - 6 - f7g�`INYZSTG S « The � dereiopmsnt of ma integrated cent er includ1w the press mtlo t stia7g' .',nnmsa le odry IrWIding, totaling 111,000 aquae feet on 10.51 act of lend in the Malty Cemmereisl 'Distrrict, Iooj!�Ied %t the►-ti6rtheaast- corner of '—yard Avenue arOToothfll lioWiard it APNt 209-141-f 1. � plated with 'ibis project is T--rea Removal erznit X7.52, , eastQ; the rsmovO of the 12 mature tree&' oAGs3sting'?f, 'iwtue tree, 6 Elm treks, 5 EycsmQ end 1 _ �r t � 1. ENYIROoNAIENTAL ESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13753 iAY� M V�SnOat lot ! . aere8 ok� into of XQJ '-dere t 48-14 4wellir units per ears), and XeftmwHfo (1444 dweilbW unit* per acre) mtriefiq an# i29 sh glo fmnily lot% on 25 20 Areas in the I,�ar1; Medium (48 ilvaelUW UrAts per acre:) 3listXi)withLq the V9etor * Manned Ca;zinriunity, ktated At the nqrthfta ;.4 der of Lie 8064 and Sken A "Na 2274U,-0i: " d� ENMOXMiIN dl ASSESSMENTAND TENTATIVE k�C:1' 132sg iY ,4M ' N COMPANY -- re sida�rh. all 11 7 corm ac`s' Xto� ::1n Sen anvil Sats,ersd a ti �. site in the Viesiiumo ° denkt V%trWb (844 ovatubj pal acre) within ter * #inria Pia A),e i Community., located at "northwtvit .=corner of Bsee nano l aid)' am ", bcst+er,Avonue, - t 2377 bgl- K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSM 4 IL4T AND T.M'T TRACT 13159 DEAR DESIGN GROUP - rea3den iii {Se tam Ipts 1 . 1 aacM of ii: 4he 'l00% anti E3is'tr%t (2-4 dwelling units per aa"),'1ocWcbd'on bier west aside of Haven Avenuo, north of Eouthecn ftoiffa 904 -oaad APNs 202 - " s "fie R* olMl Psrnit 201,,4%. As6d &W& with tls L. MINOR bkOL 3i►OO T RB3'1 -074.) .: iaWRES - An Appeal of -� eeh mt or proposed ad�€i, ono ��'- squem, i'�et t9 an existing non =cost formirg(�Iderntia,l structure #1th.4- the deneral ' Irxiustrie use Ilistf %t ('.kibu 8), lacaW at 13923 Arrow hlpaRg ckp f 229.1lt� ^ ?1. M. ENVMI ONM TAL ASSES&SIENT AND GENARAL ' PLAN � to amend,,, '; Dula on Wroent of name iaan tar ? thn of anacfrnnisl`shlnn than fol)atwb*n , obtages The rea`l'i Oment of Tull W* Upod to replace ibd,doublq %WaaatioO of Hiibp4 Road And Amot tpt. Avauae vain* a dtWW intoroWsm At V, ,AnWthy A aim and a, ream eurvo between Amsth t Avon ae fan ,per Klikiman Avet. , � v 721 South M7Wh6j i Avenue Anaheim, Caiiforwa 92804 ZENGINELAs (714) 952 2855 FAX No. (714) 9512 -3175 & PLANNERS .7'anuary 23, 1988 Mc. James CaXtpx Jas Carter Dwmlcpw t CMIWT 888 2cxth Maim Street, St ite ' 801 'pasta Am. QA 92701 IM: Sees a tal Data TMff o Analysis in AonaWticn with the ' Proposed Nei: cod Ck=oezeia3: Pmjert Cn the S UL4, est Mother of € Bageline and' DEL -Aan A-venw in the City of d Cal3farnia (219 -01� I Dear Mr. carter. As regxestecl, we have womined two additional pro jest alternatives far the l peroject cn. the s Comer of Baseline zan3 F*0lIMU'AVWV2& isi the City of Rmcho a==Iga, California.. Me alternative land uses far A ternattvwI 4 and 5 includ -- the folly : 4. 30,100 sq., ft. office project =retain rr� ne f1mmial uses anti ae up to 20 percent medic &l office uses; and Z. 40, 000 s q. ft. Medical/dental offices cis. ITE trip genemticn rates ware aWliad to the new Alternatives 4 arA 5 to � identify the number of trips that each WMId generate for daily and g.Lt, peak hOttc periccis. Tips generated are stawin in Tables 2 and 3 for all five alternatives. in ccmpar q project trips €or each altmotivt r 4AI shOM in 'fable 3, A.l t =mtives 2 arxl 3, the retail alternat %wQ,a, have tin hiOML daily traffic yr lumeS -2,839 to 3,171 tzips, Altsrraativest 1 Void 5, the and the medical der, have sitar' txsff% 'tOUMSh -1,9$3 and 2,184 sittnytt*. aternatwive professional . offices, is lawest; with 7 5 d&Uy trips. ,r MC4 +&% Cazter .Tams carter iawa ' 1 .Wi3$i411M � i project 41 ^ r, -t n.ptojert l:! 0.724' O.M 3 .. 2010 iT /Q!P P=jeCt 0493 D OAM D Attumatzve."1 (OP zare/oaF` 66) e r 1989 W/Cp vtojectt, 0.773 D 0.739 2010 V /CF P=Jwt 0.993 D 0.852 Altermetive 2 Qk&poa ciaip y pwt p=Ject (1989) 0.764 a 0.740 ` P st feat (20,10) a."S D 0.648 D AltersAt v+e 3 Post:p=JVat" (1949) 0.780 C 0.746 C Pcst-P=Jec : whoj 6Aa�9 .. _ D 0.859 i Akteznative 4 (officW20% meth i 6 ` Post projoat (i9E?9) 0,741 C 0 «707 C \ Past- P=Ject (2010) 0.863 D ` O.8Z5 D r O '.T im ffi'Cart Develmiont CMQWW .SttIGlYtsitt$ C mqmct '"`vf1 ;:2�g1,g i wjtmt#10G l Px0ject Basalim and,H41wa Avenue -^ Jam ay 23, 1988 Page 3 Alternative 5 Q%aice =Wtbw Past Project (1989) 0-;81 /f C 0.747 C c L Past-project (203.0) Q.1395 l� .,' D . O.859 D a \� (1) V"C - vd3.0 ile-bCt^ F= the mitical P.M. pesk *W period, Al0& 4V 1, 9 and 5 allJ2o* s im%lssr tatssl , p m- p wk "�k4uo m-4-4 -37.0 348 as l 346 A3te- .t�4's ;A+ .3 ha�%,�y�,Yrmrlyy kdy%mm irbc �{Cy,��i t�isdi,W v� 1mma bile t2-i *tI*r t wo ill. v iRil`. hic, sr 3J464 +7.� wR 'V.F , , "i..f. . ifs" tive 2,_ the r4e#.gbbmtood retail is e3,iqt*1y t +ar,; vith 279 p.m. pwk try, i3 ae A1rmr mtive 4x prx robvit ofiitsl, 4tfti si lt�3 tta 3c et p.ra. peak hfxlr trips Wit2t 12th. 'ihe EIl�i! i?t .v s 4 a17 5, weZ6 a'naiyzed to ident ify gcieir; p.m how t - mfaVr- UVacts and coq=�d to the crigiva ' Alternatives 1, 2, and 3. ;1 o _ �:� t' r7 0 lLri raps iftes WLto.F 3'mt+ s Cuter iiwat.{�an*n* vmv�x-w c � fix ..�. // l �..rs..erE y +ey. �. 1� Traffic =X& RL� ;yBiio.- l3�ir, i,r�,� �+ren,eow.�_�7 or.ninr.►- - k]t=ztive 4 w- OffiOW2 iQFA cml -, 30,:Loo of o s`= rztxw par I.Ow xf S06 3.47 ; 5.17 328 xZ 31 Prof. Off -4. 24400 S1 II tee ko' liow Sf ?.7.7 0.40 ''2.4 r_ i 7w 89 ,y ,at"Mative 5 — ModiatVaontal, 6,000 ar Rates per 1r00% of 54.6 3.47 S�i7 i' rSCAiYY�3: 'Zp G rat3an, \, }n mirIctY atiaw AGxm+—", a.bird WitiCo' ?Zii*ItUt" Of wwwr , D.C., and � � FIRlT81e,�8. G ' i , 1 o " "WAZI. 'acne 'Lmfflic ti? ICY o ( 69 LTM% y 23d 1988 ° Pbgo TRSLlLCi 3✓ °'..`." 14 +y� 'r.Pl A:temtive 1 -- tl tig 1,989. 11tk 296 31Ei ,��t��.r Alternative 2 91 rifcatiA 2,839 3M 1..0 ° 279 3xli 174 175 349 t�T t ivlit *^= C±'1'ik glFilfer izsi 755 3i 89 1,3O ` A te=M&N s -5 --• HadiCa C ° 2,18+5 `134 207 346 . o 0 Yl r C y „ Mr. James &VOIft"O I tom._ -- Tuti'iC Mmpwt, Analysis Zamiary 23} 19$8. -* rap 6 W` O 3lie ziema7 tit of�i a ii oweraty anal :rCr, tile raw a2twz�veis alcayg + itt �� �4texnntivee am sdsom in Taal$ 1. _fcr ocgmrative r P=POSW. R la ti a, is difforufte in the relative I*wt:s of eoct alternative } O tiJBt the of = five aat=mtiv a» I:UQC. XI wi.11 xoolt in IMMI of SMvioe �# aFeraticm fOr PMt-VMJWt 060atiaw a IM with vomu ^- �ty ratice ranging nxw b 741 to 0.781. All f 1 altwnmtiv will. xowa,.t 3n 2M "D” opcy =t in the: year -I'Mo wits vja rxtipss ap f 0.825 to r a,s��, rn teams. aitase , Cdc ftth trey aW ?2010 V/C , rAUCS aV+e siiolay= lComw than ; fsr , the Other tc or alte =tiveo. me ruminim Geut�rnativ r t p,m. peak baw effects cn hn mm*Lt n operat:3crls with Y Y vjc Xvxt im than A:to3;3atx*t" 4. :Yaw of thass aItw=tivm wilt 3aav°usignificant ne;voa and &U win rewit in a taw* 1w;*15 of SMVApe arA ini ermectica cV ticm bath in in 2010. ._ We are pleased is bm been of a&UtIanal servic* to I and rthe city of can. �• If *AM a� any tln� J�i, Plft se give AS a CO. Larry lt E /tmw, E J I SALT ipe 1+ L{ :St f _ a ' RANmo vaus HR EOK NERS ASSOCIATION January 21, 1981 `` ` -.. � "M •, l L4 City of Rancho Oxamouga J Attn: Planning Department, P.Q. Box 807 Raneno Cucamonga, CA 4473D n Wtion, it May Concerns I am writing to m on behalf of the Ranc'bo Villas Haneowners Association i�*rich is located of the south/Wost,, corner of Foothill and Baker in Ranch Cuca=iga. - I represent the 84 unit c:ondnminiuu complex located directly off of Buser Amiva and Foothill. For quite some time now #here has a concern regarding aMan» gerous situation which exists at Baker and 'Foothill. In addition,, it has bow noted that a 140 unit condominium project as been moved on the soutb%ast corner of Baker and Foothill as well as a 99 unit coadox nium project southwest of Ranebd Villas. With the -additional, flow in traffic we are qpto. concerned re- garding the safety hazard whi already exists at this intersec.fian. At this tbre we would like to inquire as the possibility of haviM, a signal installed in tI :very near futtire. „ Your written response regarding this matter would be, greatly appmiated. Sincerely yours, Sara R. Revello tannager ;fit, /cm } CC, Board of Directors <+ tanager Correspondence r� 1• Management Company, Inc, dba CoOminium Management $eNices r 569 Hordt Mountain ono, suite t pland, ofmnia 91786 b. $022, Upiar4 California 917 x•5022 Ali January rtt, 1911 , City of Rancho riucaoirnii+a 1 Plannin0 ,rowaltion- ° �c 9340 gasoline r%OAdt unit 8 < ? _ Rancho cutoftnq4t CA 91730 �- Re: titnor Aeveioprrnt Review 01-3% ` torsi o Can* I earen: e, v a i 1 an a neighbor of thiPrf, a ,,p located #t 13233 Arrow4liwwav In this city. In regard4to the appea) of the staff decftlon for tlie,,proposed addition Of 230 squirt foam to tWI oxtstir4 structure, i wjwlli like to vaice I Y total and aoopptete eWVWt Of the app icdnt, 1 slrrr 1Hi reason rhy 5.. hr. Fiaree shquId be denied this: mat t Improvement to his pi'aspeii"ty» c' 4 an not *41t to alftand the ""titap do January 276 ha"verti, i do *ant ,W Support tq,?a d. iY Plated. 1 world appreciate try fetter beanq tr aitted to the proper authority prior to the Jena *ry 27 mwettr4. 11 ° c c.a Thank you for y4vr concern, ^� l �irscaN'ely� 13251 Arr5w-migha+ay Roneho Cucir"iw4, o Geral dine J.Pui:nam 8427 Autumn Leaf Dr. R - Cuca%Onga3CA 91730 January 24,1988 Planning Dtviv "O'n City of- "t'3.t cho C�IOt ART1 i ` , P.Q»13oZ 847 Rancho CucamongajaA 93 -730 Rk: Tract # 1289 DW Commissionerzl =, 1 have been a, resident of Rancho Cucamnnj;a for 4 years y i,ivin,g in the Rancho Villas Townhome djvelopmeui;rst -of Zla )ier Avo. and south of Foq-A-hill Blvd* The residents horeg adjacent to Aak�r have b4SA, *c- periencing increasing di:fZ:scul ty awltiag Baker oilto wo ,- J6Ound Foothill Blvd. There is one stoplight east on Poothill a . Vineyard and at other west at Greve Ave. U4fortynately these _ k� Eights are tot tirkzd so that traffic northbound on Baker dan M,ke a left turn pnto wistbouttid Foothill. The, streams of' tri, ffic are heavy, constant at `speeds creati-r g , a dangerous co,tditio . At present anotho tract of 99 townhowea is pldiaed !� which can bi expected to substantL411y increase traffic e,z:ta Baker# The tract map I have seen refl€Ots6ne sntrance/e:�--t\ to this tract ---- agaiu onto Baker. This nflux of vehi: les Kill exacerbate the already frustrating and aingerclu.e traffic ondition at Raker ind-Foothill. I am rospectfulzy requesting the Plaiting eommissisn,ti to re- evaluate its 'position�wlh ,ch condones not instali.ng .a` trafile control device at Baker and Foothill., 7,I urther j V request thi; Planning Commission to consider a - second exit froa•.,, y` o ,- ,T- at 12893 on its went side to divert /wesstbouh fi d trafc ,trd k `Baker - Ave. C Your Truly « : Geraldine J.� �i�atnk,* • facilitiee ,from the immediate area, within° eightgen month creating axr-additional supply --of professioual,fa(in tratfve ` offices. t I 3. The City of ?=Acho Cucamonga has planned the de' ol,opment: <• of a subotantial ofaicelprof+essional diitri,�c on gave n �a�en;Ye` L- which is drawing a 4arge numbfroof to � p�ofets ional uses!!. ag ay from the subject property.- Ti'i.s wily continue to. draw ,base potential t�ztants far th &' fOreac4able future. 4. There will pro A{ �al4t"ys be some dem 3 for ceitain local professionals su � ; -'V r- dioclpriJx ,optometrists, den -, tists, and €am 1� law?�e� \6; qh =this demand could not fill a 40r000 square f2xst pr6fesglxc. j l7sei2d1x.4r it would be adequately `l ' accommodated by the propesst��i r ' -^^`.; The pro paced protectlr. dasigned to attract protasssia, }. t� an4 -- �ersona3 service tenants as well as .retail •tenants.. `- 5. This property..is located in the center of an established of ficelprofessioaallrgsidezttial,, :?frpa and would provide' da'y4o�c4ay convenience shroping .and servid. for the office pes`s �sel and residents of the immediate neiuhborhoocL 6 The de6ildation of .tha~' two parcels as Z%TiPA lhb :k hocdlCom- mercial would rF":uire the two parcels to be developed in a :_ -- r consistent, unified pattern. �)y ,�J f) • -� h 1� C - -f c N c F JUSTXF :ATIOK WITH R Applicant requ rate t';a. ��*he General `Plan De on and the Zo ng 'of the suly� e�ylt prorAV ty be chiinged €rom oiEZ'eell'rofeasfonal :v Dia: rict (OP) to 3164E or3hood/ ummerc ai; Aietrict (RC). The site is a 3.45 acre parcej proposed td be , seders a retail/service commercial center anA is intended' to provide,day- o-day comvon- 0 ience kitopping and silrvicces, for office persoTmel and residi snte the imt�tdiate neigbb4nccod. ' The proposed, •change is ..requested for ? ? the following reasosaew 1. With, the �jtiibl.nq'6x ,` General Phan devignation . -,and zoning, these y ya�ce,.a y there appears to be a large vacancy f ��in the existing office buildings in the immediate vicinity. S�� etas 'site. There it n� need, or demand tor.--'additional offices '\ ! ! 2. The City of Rancho Cucamonga will be moving "its DATE: January 27, 1988 W77 TO: Chair and Reebers of,,,tfva.Plann ng CorrAfssIon FROM Bray -,Xt. Iee, Giro Planner BY: Toa 0;Ahn, Ps.sis rt Planner SUBJECT: TIN EXTENSION Fal 5` eMT � t YE 12332 , " CRIS T I.D MAW- 'A C —I t reska!'sntNI s 5d1 ton WTS1'la� on approxiskuly ' 5' acros . of , land it 'the' Very \Low Residpntiai Distrirt (less t han two welling units p,,,r acre)., loe,oted obi. the east sida of Haven Avenue q&th 0 ' the Hillside Drai#aga Channel • AM 201.- 121 -24.- .4 IL �:k4OUND: T4ntativ2 Tract 12332 U04 lots on 141 acres) waF Tg n'3 aTry approved by the -1Janning Cd*,%ission . oil May 11, 111987.- % t applicant recov *k Phait I .(53 'cats). Subsequently; applicant received a, new approval for the., re.nining 151 lots on February 12„ 1986, 01ch is Oli ';tq expire:-in February 12, Me, According to the 5urfdivision Md kct, a taitative tract crap 4Y be extended up to fivf� years froi- Z-`th& date of approval. Tt;orefore, 66 applicant_ may request. two additional, time extensions, , in one- year incrents, ,extending ° the slap until Fehrvery 12, 1991. The � applicant-,is requesting a one year time extei%ion teat expire on February 12, 1989: II. ANALYSIS: striff has analyzed the proposed tip extension and has `rz a �the proposal with .the, develnp "nt criteria outlined_ in fit= My °s Developments Code. Bused upo:l this review, the project steers t4a Basic Residential Development Standards of the iavelsip,*nt CoAe fcr the leery Mow lresfdeotial District except For the requireJ minimum lot frontage of 50 feet at the front property line..,. This project shoWs 19 lots of the - .total -151 that have a oi< front age, ranging from 40 to 49 feet.'= _ However, tha'se 19 cul-de -roc lots average 31,516 square feet,.ove 8,000 square =feet larger thae thz average sire. of the remairsing lots wdthin tha 'tracts_`,Ois inconsistency is not considered to b. ^,sigMficant by tit ff aM— would not significantly alter;, the deeelo nt of t�* project,, III. REC NDATION• Staff reco"nds that the, planning Comissicn approve a time extonsion -through, Abe adoption of ' act«uchQd Resolution. ITE14 A December 2, '1907 Mr. Brad SUIIOOk' c' r DiY'e tot" of F1wUl3ng CSty of Rancho 'O camonga 9320 -C Satgrilbe Road ' T "Cho cuca mon¢as, VA sl X o � qu t for one-year extension on T04taRtivo Tract 32332 Door Mr. Bulk. rz Wo 1110Pa Just aacrulTed tb* uni *proved port3ran of Tentative, .; ? a _V_ x.2332, and have contacted an engineorinq coapany t* c'Oap1*'t * the required Work to record *,-.final 'xoj�, I-rx - ddItion, we hove beg , ryttx° *arjr-�rt 2` �ffileal�1�11 efforts to " detalraAira thie type p /_ : m at rfi+ot SUitab,14 for the Project. *111ch wa balitVAr Will b*',Vory n�sea�+akt� �e tr�t2x the existing datreltzpmen�; in the. ` tjtasct. 3rs aoe 3asa bassi ini�tax>sted by our cozaaeultaatita<" ", tAatr ther�e�a, is Insufficient time to complfita :. th& above W07,�k bt�� >� �-%4 ,�.� v t'atioil of the. Tentative Tract M&P, we heretb y a c as : t cur ao #ncert +�ha3derat3ats In ` extending ToAttt3vo Tract male 12332 for one year in ardor for us trr coak;?leti� our work. t. r`1 e� $tsClo:gec ia: our $62.00 fi i g fee ra��4i4 forte that Tentative Tract 14aip eittenarion'�e+xuaeatr '�earefo file tniw request today In - order try be'pl #care On the . *atrs�aary 27, 1988 agenda, i If you i Ye any questions' uetei 3anaa gla atse toeo-2 �`r$* to 4`i122tEtrrt 37te at anytAmat, :i Sinr;aerar�y, t., Robert j 'y. ii�w�0d tl �ria ti. AVON,i1 Enclosure ` RFWV f_f7iiLlal a "Gi'GteYi9t30Yi yWi�ny.cqh n.. y}'y?,*nn `Li'�o li�rh+.r '+ucamonrg�. 4 9ivliStdr t3#suF 11 i{ wnt, rune M 7. �t ttpug� raEh t alititrniarliCitti Vf-j) 4,6 MM - Id op Ingineer, CONSULTING�&& ENGINEERS SAN OERNARDIN % 186 RO3PiiAMTY LANE. SUti915'''SAN Ci€Ri+tANDIN0, �A..- 4,240{ - ��: - (714) OWN" deaamk�r is, 1909 Director of Piannin9 City of Rancho Cucg%cn5'* E 9340 Saseiinst Road ti y : �k 1 Alta. %Maa aixox +r� , x „�� `� 1 Rat Tentativ,t T--"t 1233- - Havenvierr_Etl�tat�e' ` Dear Mr. 6ul,ler, We bexe sy p,;rsz uast an exten*xion` C ttze apiaxo\�al 1 erstat� vex Tract 4 ix a2 - HALV#hvi4v Utxtes which Js 4ue to se rt* in rabruary. F PJeasa notify met it thus ilk anything wts:ah wcul3'= prev*nt the 1 I beating- of this iTirat exten4cn Thank �rau Z�r yaur azcssfde��tiaat �� this ��tt��. �✓ 3 Veer trullf 4pr$� ASSOCTA ".tO zKGx `ZZ. R:i. Philip M. 00ugijp�sr P.E. cc: M wait l Sim tab". Mr RbM lomay rtr - The ChristjAno Co, Mr. Peal Williams ssacjaxed Rnr�laeer4 (C?ataeria} 4 MAt OFMC . 316 EAS#` E TEC-T + tlNt`J4M0. IM 006+1 (pity 3 Si'ttt X - 777 a' �� re�trr / itLM'rr�il�. tlrWt � � teYMrr_�• teltrteC ..`�'y •+�......,, . 4.r G�rtw od raatr o uowr r.wirt�r '' . � eer n:+x rtKrr 66i489kf 1-7 m II•i.rO alc 00 two ® 8� IN Ak IMF,.; . SITE UT11.IZf9TlOfi Jos Ts i r �1 CITY OF RANCHO I CXCANIONGA � � tITLE PLANNING DIVISKJ)u SCALE t w CITY 01 ITEM., n 9 N I Y:.. i = � 4 $ygrt's q tv :ici W- ) Zi yr ••�.� -r CITY OF ITEM PUti.`+t[`ti€".s DIVISCC)N EXHIBIT- —_�- ! SOLUTION NO. 136,23 A RESOLUTION 'iHi; PL1 't Ili` 1Na CO'«NISSION. O .111E CITY OF RANCHO CUCWUA, CAUFORMIA, CONOITIMALLY 'APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT 12;1320 - ��tuCM �(. qv p +@. .,,jj+j� �}y, y yys��j y, ,y, ,t3r.. �{ ��[ °! WHEREAS, loi:�}7r4 tiv r4` 'it Mip' NO- � K�FeCa ', btre' na er iv7' ap F submitted by Walter I.aband, applicant, for; he purPo$e of subdividing the real property situated In the cite of Rancho 6campn9a, County of San Der ardino State of Califbt tint, dc , ttriixed as a tast�t tot dovelopment °unto I.SI lots, regularly cane before the Planlsinq Comissilp" for public hearing and action on February 12, 1986; and WHEREAS, the City PliInner :h'% recOMVWod approval of the Flap subject to all conditions set for,, h in ti�� Eegineering and Plannin Divi sort's reports; and WEREAS, the Manning ' c x�! ssi� , has read and considered the Engineering Ann Planning Rivisitai8's rer%a��iand has tAncidorod other evidence presented at the public hearing.! � ROW, THEREFORE, the of the kith of Rancho Cucaaapnga dots resolve as followOl SECTION 1: The Ptana ng Coaaaistion Mikes the followti�g findings in 'ftp regard Co Tertat Tract No. 1, 332 and the `t•`iareof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General J i Flan, Doe opMnt,`codex and specific snares; ,j (b) The design W im"royZIOntz. of tip �antative tract is consistent witty Platt; ,t4 r!evalo nt Coder and spaciffe platri, (c) The site is pt"Visically suit'we for ire a -= devetopsent prPA!issd; (d) Tht design of the subdivistun is trot likely to cause substantial enpp €rtnrtesttasl damage and avoidable injury to human$' and wildlife or their habitat; (a) the tentative tract is not cause serious public health problia. "is; (f� The design of the tontative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired "by the public at large, record, now of for access through or use of the Property Within the proposed subdivisiort, Page 2 ,I r 1.J (9) That this Project vill nat'ce�eate akivesrse impacts -on environment and a 1'.egative Declaration is Issued. SECTION 2: Tentrtive Tract flap eio: 32332, a copy of which U attached hereto, s hereby ap*v,ed subject to dl "1 01., the following conditions and the attached Standard Goeed#tiona:' ?t.ANNING DIYtSION C 3. A s;gnaturs sign -off shall be (4 )aine�d within the individual homer CC & R's d.;gned to ..alert the buyer as to the require�aerat r street trees* �J including �a#ntcance. Prior tojupancy, streat / trees and Slope plantings on iextiviahal parcels Est E be inspectoA and Approved by``�thi City. 2. t strip— landscaping ardU street toes, with VOW A 0 iftigation systems shall a requireM j along streets *A* and "C'. "° 'the r"air •landscaping and street trees Bey be added with 4ach phase of street construction. 3. Rooted r . ground cover pis rar uirrd for sFoPt bank erosion control where required by standard conditions. Hydroseedinq shall not be allowed/ because of mky soil. ENGINEERING r �- I. Dedioation of ingress aW egress and maintenance easUMtz ov all interior, streets> shall be dedicated tan the Pitt Kap to the city of . Rancho Cue"Mga EngieeeriW., Pablic Works divisions; the Cucamonga Couat,,? hater` _b strict, th* Sawa Jarnardino County Flood Cvatrol District; Southern California Gas CoMOY; �,-:O;ethern California Edison Company., 2. The northeasterly portion of the project area (fl"d Control District Eatsement) stall be made a part:;af the tract Wrap. The CC & Rs for this tract shall ct make provisions to incorporate this area into the Homeowners Association once this area► is developed. y 3. An access aseeaent by Separate instrwwt $halt be provided to the property. 'lying east of the pioJect arta - (owntd by San $ernardino County Pl(nd Control district). The document shall be prepared to the satisfaction Of the Dr tritt. This'condltion $M11 be waived if the acc+es \is not regdiretd by the flood Control District. t Page 3 4. They Hacaettwors Association established /Vs a l p rid�t sptcifil.ally for adequate funding fors! the �6turs main *finance of the private roadways Yd d the,-'Haven Avenue laWscap'ng. APPRWO AND ADOPTE{t TlfIS 12TH MY OF FEBRUARY, 1'986 PLA COMMISSION OF THE I�IY - c, "'p; O� RAtECF1G CilCphlQ#16A _ BYE M x ou . MAW- ATTEST: " A 16 Brad Buller, ik`;xity Secretary of the Planning Commission Of the 'City of Rnchsr �?J &awnga, 6) herOf'certify that tho foroping Resolution was "krly and regularly introduced, pexaad -� d A*todk, by the Pla Ling Commission of -the City of Rancho Cucaonga, at a regulars 4"ti of the Planning Coission herd on the 12th day of Feb�aaru, 19�, by the fol maouting vote- to.*Jte - . % 'I AYES; COMMISSfUNERS CHITIEA MCNIEL, BARKER, REMPI"L., STOUT NOES: - COt�`+tISSIt3�EERS NONE (1.. ABSENT: CO.WSSIONERS II NONE o 0 0 Q ' r RESQtatnw rats. APl eFF VQ A TIME EXTUSION -"TRTIVE tWi NO-12337 A. Recitals. i} Wei Cristiano ;e ms has filed an ap fiicavion for the extension of Toetative Trsct #a�e.��33Z�as described in 4 title of -this Resolution. Hereln0ter in thlf usotution, the subja.t Tim Extension tt rdgast is referred to as "the applt�tion . ° tii3 s� At Fe nary 12, 1986, this GteW si=n ade ed its Resolution lao. 86 -23, thereby approvv#q, subject to speafic conditions and time limits, Tentative Tract No. 1E332< (lit) All legal preftWisitos to the have ococcurred. aaoption eat this �fsoleation B. Resolution. �� *M, THEWOR, it is hereby found, detor*1 ImalWe by the Planning Ct>AwisxiOn of the pity of :aneta€ Ucovortp as #ol fo� S This? is(Aon h*relby sW- tficqily finds that a13 of the facts set fo. i �h n the Recitals, Puri A, of this Resell of are true and ewor +ect. sued upon substantial eevidoetca ores too to this Cs er3!ssion;' including are tA" and oral' staff :aepo: , th#s CoMmission hereby spd�ci#ically finds as folI W. � r tai` m.e pr-aviously apprGve4 Tentattiv* 'Map is in `AtL bstaenti;,l compliance wit" �e city's current "- ,Anaral 04an, Specific, Plans,-' Plans, Ctidets anei,pol#cles; a d Ct db Ite extanslon oi' the "tentative Map will not •cause S1,9nificant inconsistencies with the curretnt ot"ral Flan, Specific Plans. Ordinanes, Plans, Cod" and Policies; a . Cc# The exteension of the Tentative Map is not likely to Chew* p16l is health„ an safety problem and (d) 7he,oxxt"sion is within the tir e liarits rr+escribed by state law and local ordinance; , s J c TT 12332 . Christim CoWany � janaary 27, less - Page 2 J `sat B. Based U00AY the fail hi}i�s LF M ISM I�lF i s o 1(� �°6t +•( A'�rtl f�a 1 and 2 above, this Coauaission lwt +:� a lime Ex�er►�i�l fq► . ,��__. x, * W grilf r l ..r ,. *• (. tB Trot J Ica = 12332 Cristiaiec "nY' FfrbrW7 ;2* lqtV r A. The Wputy .:!tr*vary to this c4oisslow sholl,l rertiO to thu adoption of this Resolution. ,1 y�y� �'�y �i ry�'�y� }yam p9g �yg� yr y,�� APMVM RM9FF' � THIS 2 if! DAY o jmgw p� iii% PLANNING COM&I3SION W TFX, CiTi OF PJEi C ti' � itC ft t BY: o {�� arry T. "1!k3 ATTEST: Aric Oul I etr, r 1, Brad Buller, Cij Secrrti+wry of the Plan !ng iao fission of the City of Rancho CGC Y do_ srehy certify that the f ^regoihV Resolution Was dul ,j"d regularly introduced, passe, and, . doped by than Plamdng Caaseissiext, o the City of Rancho Cupcxar"044t VPTenrli a� rrt� ta 9"ting of the vomission held on the 27th der ui Oth � , 19 ','by the fe, lowing vote -toy . ° ` AYES: CIMISSIONF.RS: „ ,r HOES; < CCt�1IS5iifli3: „ AeSW; CO�I9ISSI0lIERS•. ., _ 3 - Y IP � ° tl �.T AW DATE: dahnuaq`„27, 1988 70: Caimweh s idemers of the Punning Cnaission FRO{: 3Mad Buller, City Plamer ((( BY.., Beverly Nissen, Assistant Planner r $IUW:J TRACT 13444 DEStSN °REYIEW - J.:P. RMADES DEYE O M iiT :< vesi gn reV ew Ot oun ng, efevations a plan for a previously approved tract wrap tPnsiating of §6 single n» ,xiIy Tats on .12.5 acres of land in, tRa Lary " Density Residential l+iut ict i2 -4 drtel3 #ng unit.' per acre within the Victoria Planned Com iiCy loca ± it the, northeast corr=er of Milli-ken Avenue 4H. the Sauth c Pc�;flc R�iltoad - APR., 227 - 011 -01, 02; 07 and 1227 -01h 01 0$ Ej and 10. � T. FM1E;CT ANG SITE DESCR1PTi0ii A. Action Requested: Approval ,q€ but-IdIng elevations ar,d r' lot plans, B P,_*°.g9ect Density: 4.5$ dwell pg units pert ad e. S. Surrounding Lanni Use a nd Zoni . - � � or rt -, vacant Low --Hec um ens-Ry. Resid t►tiai (4 -8 dwelliog units per wre)' cP South' - :- �uuthern Pacific F.ailr'oad And recant; Pediumt Density :Residential (4 -14 dwelling units per acrel East ia.artt; koxr Density Residential 1.2 -4 dweIling unitt � per acres S% r West Single family � sidenti-al, Low Density Residential 1 I r (2 -4 dwelling chats per acre) 'D. General >Flan Designations- Project "Sii '�"Er ,r iaa�3ens'ity Residential (44 dwelling units per acre) ' North, Lair- Mediums Deidsity Residential i4m8,dwellinq units per acre? South Rai"'iroad and Low- Mediums tensity Residential (4 -a dwelliar units per acrei� t Est )Low -Med um liensit? Residential (4,78 dwelling units v !per acre) Hest Low- Nedlu4 Density Rosidevitial 14 -$ dwelling units � per acre) ; PtAf.Wl4 Commnsf�m SI'RFP REPORT ` January 88 .. _ Page 2 II. - AMMLYSIS• > A. GenePAT• On Aprjl 8, 1987 the Planhir� Comiolon ,Ipproved t! '" M ive Tract 13444 for the development of 17s si�#gle family lots on 46,91 acres within Victoria YineyaiIt, Worth., that At tiara,, '' the " applicant (William Lyon Co.) proposed .o141y to subdivide, the pro0ir y,.;.grade the site ant!„ i.nsta11 toe Infrastructure. $ubaequently, 'lots 29 -84 t56 'totaQ -were selld to J. P. Rhoades Bevelo nt Co. (fgr*-.rl,= the W 4rthy Co.) who is now proposing to develop them The project is essentfially a \continuation of ihs Rhoades Geveinpeent arl�ject located "'an the wart side of Nilli{can Avenue (Tract 23064 }. i`re floor pi;ins are Lew pcapcaed for the project rritlr each of the floor plans haviargltt�ee eeYations. Two of the eu„dels lava bean previously approved forrxct 13060 (known as liodeis ani 3 for -,bpth trr«�ta7,_ �thas s are 1,777 2,101" - and square fit, respectivalx.o}ih` 2 story units. Pl ° ;ro 2 is "provided .10 times, while filar is provided 27 tie s. - a new floor plan, Plan 4, is also a story unit consisting of ,2,690 square feet with 31ndrooww '; a `` bonus° room and 2� baths. This plan.:is provided 19 timies.� ., It should also be noted that: all trails, periwter walls, w perimeter 'slope &W street lafidscaping have beery, approved through the Vineyards North landscape package. - Twenty- eight lots or 50% have been provided with RY parking it =the side yards, (i.e., 10 feet of unobstl'uCted yard area on`ihe garage side of the Pouse). B.. �0�2ssi w; Review Tom ttee: The Design Review yommittee "-� Ick, Toioy, p eaMa.1 rev awed the on January 7,.`928 proposal and recommended approval subject to the following conditicns?, 1. Corder side, yard walls or lots 70, 11,; 66,__ 51, 64, 65, 77 and 78 shall terminate eien with or behind the frost j of the house rathAr than extending Into the front yard. [ -2. '. The scare of the pillars located on the frost parch ofy J Plan 4, Elevitionn A and,C shall be enlarged. OQtailing shall also be addod on the pillars to be compa0ble with thatUpn either side of they garage do(tr^s. VII. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The prtjwt is consistentt�"with the Victoria anne oa 4na the e4heril' Plan. The Oroject- ' y and gill not be detrimental to adjacent >,o osties or cause lsignificant " environmental impacts.. In addit44u; the propc"sedt use - is in Compliance with the applicable prod � a��ns of the Victoria Planned £oupunity, the Pevelop nt Code and Ci''ty,'Standards. (� e 4 n � p i r- . "9 i?` f :.•, �'. .:ter, �h I U MW tt rrEm. EXHiBrr-.,64,fLscALF. I out -.W-z t( - U )r ►! RESOLUTION RANCHO CUCAMNSA PLANNING Ct �,a(5ION APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR LOTS 29 -84 OF TMT NO ' ,*34$4 F R THE DEVELOPME9T OF, 56 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS 09 M2 ACC CS OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIp ATIAL " DISTRI -ICT DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) WITHIN TKE< VICTORIA PLANNED; COHMNITY LOCATEA AT THE OORTHEAST 1COP409 t 0F "jLLIKEJt AVENUE AND THE SOUTHERN PACIFiCGRAJLRCiAiI APR: j� 1112, n2., 'DT .00 227-0811-01, 'D$, 09 AND lO. ' A. Recitals. (il Rhca(;es Development Co. has f40d an 4PpM--4tiQ1 for the Design Review of lots 29 -84 of Tract No,, 13444 1as described in the ti l* of this tRer0lution. Hereinafter, 'fit* �ubJKt Desi$rr ^Revit� request is referred to as. .the application o. thr,Jahuary° 27, 1988, MOL Pl dtdvrrg Omission of 0m Civ Of � Rancho Cucamngs -A44 a otirrg to con yder the applicotan. ('iii_) , legal prerequfOtts to the 440%h of tt&,R,esolution hrv4 occurre4. ,, B. Resolution. - Now, THEREFORE, it is'�ereby found, 4termined hill reso'Eued by the Planning COMMIsSiOn of the,,CiV of Rancho Cucaaonga 45 follows.. 1. his Comission hereb�r_ iflcally finds that ail of i* facts set' forth in �cwtals, Part A, 6f1h1s!Resolution are true errd da t, 2. 81sed;0c0n substantial evidence presented 'to `;his cu*jj pion during the above- referincert eseiing on liouary 21, 1988, including writtef and oral staff reports, tht co.mfssion her#6b pecifically finds as follows (a) That \thtr , = 46p*'S44, protect is consistent with the abjectiVW4f the General Plan-, and () Than the proposed designs is in acearc w,rr the obJectf a of the Development "Code and the -- rposes p€ the istrict Arr which the site pis located, and (c) That the proposed de,$�gn is in compliance -with each Q the appl #cable provision$, of i` vietoria Community Purr and the Development Code;'110 (i) That there iproposed," design, %gether wits the conditions applicably grate, will ttor, be detricental to the public health, Wety� welfare, .or materially inj rious to properties or* s improvements in the vicinity. G I'LA�tNIN6 tiFR'i'linr`a7iCC'1C R+�"i��iNtJ. i'� �{/r ,%Y`y� \`�•" ' Trace 134+ Desi1p Refit Pr `Rhoades . J) danQry 21, 1 Pago 2 , 3. <,,gased upon the findings and conclO'ftns set forth in _ piragra and, 2 above, this Commission hej' abj� a0pre taa* the ap(�licati'b sub*t tor each and every c"0,t . 1 set �frib "below in Star4ard andi, the t}ttachel ,MrAitions' a tmc4d hVtmto,y�nd incorporaUd harein b,� this refersace. (a).—A ever , side yard walls 64 lots 7'i„ 7�, r;.�1s X04, t, } 77 and 78 shall terminate eveW with d`r behind front pf the house rather Chap extending udnto 1 the front YArd< The.xevis:scgj ai i locations sha11 be `tangy s shown n the final v ..plan which shOl be Z` '� h� revi . rt a x Mdva~d by Ci�t-? Planner prioP to -the A*SUA C�, ef' building pernaitt. (b) The scale of the..p lar located on front porch o€ Plan 4, Eleva►t A and C shall be enlarged, ` 3eUiTing wtail -ai be added an the pillars to W' wati t art ;aft r side of_ the "gatrage = � doors. The rear sed plans shall,,\be reviat*=d ..and j approved, by the 'city Planner prior+ the iss"a net ; of buiidtfg W?Mi:ts. ' (c) All pertinent,i i:onditions , .of Resolution Oisi approving Tentative Tract 14 shall apply, fda • Pri+or, .:issuance of 1014 ng permits a`' final acoustical ,analysis shall b submittelO detailie attigation to � la�asuees .necessary ac eve not „ :earels, b tth Interior and_ exterior. con nt with City stat�'rc for lots abutting Millike"i nue. 4. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shalt certify to the adoption -of this Resplution. APPROVED AND AMPTED THIS 27T!i DAY OF JAXUARY Wa. t; PLANNING COMISSION OF't"e& y -�OF RANCHO CUCAWkA BY: arry. T. WM e airman - ATTEST: ARI BMW, Deputy Secre arrlr ' L:' ii G <--. v .• - � � it � P;AMIW ISSINt P.Er+OiUTIN t c" Tract 134A4 1 s IS kav +ew, - J. Rhoades January 21, I r Page 3 ' %11 _ I, Brad g4tl$ 19e Sebrtta f ,than, Planning Coissign of ;rte "Ci *of.. Rancho Cuca`�a n lij) do' �reby Certify thAt the =furp� Rig Reealutioh Wai s duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopud by tie Manning eiasid'a, of the f City Of Rancho Cucamnga, at a ragulavweting,,Af;,t l+ -janninq rWmisuln fifld as the 27th day of Jana y, 1908, by twe Cpl jawing vvte_ta_wi ,�a c ; AYES. COMISSI*RS 77 Q :TOES. Ct3ll lssfoml si ABSEW : CNQ ISSXOMERS: n o, - J D o t3 5. A j Ws a � I- Mir " fish a' «� . , Q a .. •3 ' "i lid `{' lit ' .i - 'p� r •^ A-V .S M $.+ASS �K s ` sell" 11 • ;, a 11—q;1 �— 62 Is 9 He r L � Ow Qtiaft VOL MO yp aYl.+4 IN TA pi R y yMjx y Myii u � =`r rill ;ate r. C` e� w� ft Y i S� _x yr � � �leN�w *wi NN �yw , :�i� '�r.,�^ ! " «a. w �` 3 Z Y `� AAAR'''4 V Hill fi'S Zsi q I\ ttt N y Par p� = 3pgA F 22 ° mus X 1; 1 Z. tits as w 1=81t, US �s na- yp a � sits rye _ in �~p'� °C�� _ _ S a.e � i� a ��'� tv * syy +may w0 11UN :r y �/ P 71.1 a•Y ��� yes ,1��1 _�� y`ye ��. �iiSS� �tiE�3� f. �%, ■' L` �p �� +sir � My �is L�� 1.. Rp M ri Y � yYy� .'�p � Y X11 �i�. @@yyyO�$ at..T p." �N � IR 7L R �DDa p�w l++iiNNN�SII +/Q �ir ^lt � ��ll i. l��y� e 7/ yy. "!Y, i All w a.•^ +i�.'�''pM wl; � arY ai�Y awl a�1$ .. ►7e »fR i6 �1 Y g�"Mwp cf a ,6 � �Zi� �M•'•O N1C N� ''�, 7+w wo AZO 0. .{d'e'S�"N..� 1p o:. fid .11.1 O�wi y��°,� ��.. rAwNi� Nyy w�y� @O@p~'�•1t�C. �` STyMtj M�¢5`�/� daaE +�+'.:11� \ ?� V 6 Np�is[[ 0— AMNQ'1 Fir .14 to, Ni, ;;4 kk t` r tt 1 'I r 0 422 OS: Q rig y� 45C� �1 _ivy. tic �y y �t « LLi aaaa a i�� �� /i g7a� NJ ��i I 1! A 3 « ry ' °..w a'•�II� «� + 2 rg� 8 .SN.O R. if. y «yrV$ , Z_ ! +rW. � 6sgy x �.+`a°+'i►": sr.a �rR .'''..� �R KIM' 1'�IhN 'may S7 Q 'a'LR«'`°' tD ray 1 Met 1% 11,;5 INZ UA CL MN w 4 v� w +iFB'T `y 1 gf IRN Hit IS M fi p 4ti HIS gill EEtt LiY �(`s} $1�li�yPYyi�11 � `gyp ml w,OB .2` 2..Vx N @aPi ai� YY a�c 1—.71 W s ( Y'_2MrO �\., ySY yz~ Ili si _s 7 i iii. 4P g�t�s M +. °MN Y��� Tom: � w � Y_�� � ■�� M�S w ww wf�i M J � i�� ���� �► -wIa4g itAi. �sT.wtltltl� �VVA J`� R iv OR ._N_ Y_ WceJ`r./.4y1WG ` PA9trsE �- s.�t 9� 0MM4�J1 �( ii l7i�wwaii M tttY 1` cP� :n � `7i a'«i...a �`� If cy 44 l C 13- N w y! w 3p a ki, I- alit UT PUT r o!S :•• NZkg a a ri o °a { low L O/ by .3 Nq� if t r� H ips 9 v� RW . r 3 �s YA aP Y Np rs 'Has P+ ; SID _ p I Mail M � IS :' t 3 N .21 i U ._.� 3Lis 0 stal -4 tat R ~YfY r0: M �.r 999 ii q�,. r.���/p y�` . ` 'ply n��. 9 'i "qMi !� O�Iy�•`s jQ�+rt'�0 ••'e `$�Ni V, N n! a! •ri N �; �!' !Mt r a I, p 00�0 OL Ni/�• �18 Qe�il YY�y Y � •_ b ', 12 M. Ns fild I- O MM Y • ww @ ,� M 1 �.1 y iaD w TP Y x64 ice~ R__ S TAN Tv 1 qc All w tii li ti 3V ^� SH odTSOI^ a � 's t lei 63 N r 22 �j a i$ la jytt a r$'8a fig »��'� � "� \-• j bS .11 242 it IX w T \ � s ...j .mil` - J E 6 `l I MIA }� �qif N Y� HS i MIA jsll I , flyy l. If yq ```{ `z kW y1°i <i - CITY OF ECHO CUCAk,*A , ' WOW P DATE: January 27 198$: t TO: Chain ao and timbers of the Plannin g,C it i fian Barrye i. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer Barbara Assistant Civi � .Enginter � SUBJECT ,\_ TIME EXTE ,4 i l `PAM ! 431 -9R g' !t[ 3 IES - A r v _s on u 317rQs ono arrcels in� low ,(2d,t/A&) c%velwpment District located on the Aasf side off, Beryl Avehur, south of Hillside 3bW (09 1061- 611 -0N1 i`entati)e Parcel Map 9431 as shown on Exhibit "CO wits initially approved by ther''Planntng Commission on February 12, 1986, for an initial U3 year ( period untiV 1,7tbrbary 12 1988.^ L The apg \ ant is r�ra retesting the first of a possible three one-year \ \time ex��io3%;� The letter of regost (Echibit 1 is attached for Our' _._ AE ✓ TIBN. It, Is recommended that *`Manning Comission 'adopt the a c e'{c 1`r�tiottl; °PvfFrg, ac one-year tttensi+q for Parcel Nap 9431. The;oew expiration date would be February 12,1989. Respectful ly'submftt+ed, r; r" Barrye R. Hanson ✓� Sonior Civil Engineer: BRH:SK: h Attachments = r ITEM C 9 , RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLtrrION OF THE WHO COC1 NOM PLANNINQ Co.*ISSIOk, ' FP1blY�NG, 1E TIME.- EXTE�JQN FOR PARCEL MAP 9431 �) � / I a request has. been filed ftr° tips 4xtanxfi�'or t above- describ projeut, pu+� I , Section I.501.H.?� atf Ordi « " Subdivision Elydin nce and t nand= X84, the WHEREAS. this plannif�g ;�issfian c ©nditio�asliy "approved the 3 aLOve- described` tentative parca; n February 12,--1"6;. 9 ( fo to► ,Y IO i � Rang w Cucaartirrga Piaa6"fin Cowerfissfit`n has artde SEGTIl38i 1. A. That current Oofijiiic, rrw n: inn and., inventory condions aka it unreas6r4a to buitd at` #itis l f� tier. i B. That strict enfIrcM-At of the condittons of approval ` regarding expirat'r�'s would not ire, consistent with the intent of tl a Divalopowlt Cam. C. That. there hay: been no sign4" ieaant chhi a the character of t! area f n hich `� prof #i»is that w6uld cantle the pro$eet tor becc <;onforxrEng or inconsistent attth ctr"At standards. SECTION 2. The Rancho Cucamonga Pinning COwissian hereby- time extefts -' "far: grants a ktration i t�ararl,� #rant 9431 gri"arIndustries 2- 12-61 kC ,�J RESOL OV PM 9132 JAMB 27, 1989 - - z io1C APPOWED AMPTED TKS, 27TH DAY OF nixa , 1988 ; FLAMING COWISST(W OF THE,.,CITY OF RUCHO COCAWA BY: arry T. ATTEST: _ Jr IIFN Buller, Uputy Secretary y Brad Bu't'ler, �+ty Socraiary of the Flaring C �M111iSSi�c, of Vw Rancho Cucawwnga, do hereby ify fOrwi::3 Rt#oIution 'It,I ' fi crii that the WIOs 1 a introduced, regularly introduced, passed, and a*ted by the Naming Caw fission � City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meting of 1111!* Pluming Cam eissf held on the 27th day, of J.amar , 1988, by tP& €ollMnq vain- to-wit: ys ° �. AYES: C"ISSIOWAS: Z�D W-S Cokissowns: ABSEUT: COMISSIONERS: - 0 1 o 1 \ k � , I✓ -• IIJ Or Pscember 29, 1987, The pity of Rancho wtcamonga. 9320 -C Aaseling Road Rancho:;Cucamonga, CA 91730 A,ttn: ''Vicki .Bay Re: Tentative parcel Map No 94,31 Bear Ma. Bay; Confirming our phone conversa� \1an today we are unable to pa�ceed with the development of 14ssess�rs parcel. No. 1,061_611 -01 Parcel MUP No. 9431 at thia tit. L EWe have just.rece ^y purchased\ his pi�perty fir'y� Y;- ;chael Harrison, 1. the original aepgls.::aht aad need dditaorial t�.m a pi oiler Iy determine our markettzg strit,agg , We are therefore reg= testing , -qn extension of the original Fabruary 1988 deadline. Hs�go �•��l c a» f in the amount of $62.00 "whi s car ch-cx ch you indica d old be ,the application fee for the }filing of oUr-extension .n 'truly Y '' / amiss C. 4ice� Enclosure JB /w3 MY O RANCHO IMC WMG&G 4 � rit l'. a te, a 40 J L TR /0117 i Sys�yhQS's"y�!�' %5M XA ...'�� Aft4ft c CM O.pME RA's "RO CT-T' —AW P: C aw DOWN- ,e . _ NO. 94311, is i C,J AbW 3w if VL i � - !w n6 h7v ei 4i�tw Gttaia � .. gent w tra oautewt, sera • tebu�itra. I� \ a« atneevtesretoaurwst�e�w »srwawe�r�ter 1,, , _ ao'nt a, ttet v. orawr as awrcunr arrr, a rs awl +rtaar•aeaes.�w.tar.wWrorat�e6. rt nat X xr" a*a+w rrrxv w. ux � � ,. ,,i �. dirt ��'� t} r •-�"'t^._r �-9r" ( rake/ a e VL �+�t'i y :s 1 { r i RANCHO Al } STAFF ' R1 DATE: ;�lanuar y 958 te. 1977. a Chair+an &d t� gf tine planning Ur46 isyon FRMI: " Brad OvAer, Cii Ptanndr 11 DIY: _ Dehrt'veler� JkssociAt `41a�- SUBaE('?': ENVIRQMW,',X -: sESSIW AM TENTATIVE TWT 13579 - PtYOUO -� r` mui ti - saF y? r vo n . cWr ; s Tng o ,Un4i, on. 695acres, of lan (in the Aedion,, esidenti E Distriht (x-14 6WI �n9 un4t5 per acre }, `�f�cated br►. th , �n east,�sidt of #i'llmaf�Avenud, US' narttt of I9t�t Street ��- APN: 441474 >I2. (Cpntinued ir- January 13, 19 'T f ti S ` T. BACKGkVj P , mertidned i T ` �evi ,� staff rsori ;this ite�r has o itag series en C beginning with tictol "sr 14, r 198X �1t #lie last etf`' , 4apvax�' IS, . 8)I� the nr �g ' _ Coaeii,s5ion ,direr staff ift-Tode a. Rasa Mat, of Denim; ;f Plans had �hot Q Omitted for t� 4"ing '' Co�aission � Jonuaderl4 of The 4 due to Ii u3u an s t n±visdd plans on � g. d timing cwIstrMnts, the Desig - Re�cier C ttee is not }hedC�lea + s"e5��2+i `" a ,glans until , ebruaay 4, 1933: per, ,`r e�)sng CJg�` r -' �� ? 3an� the Resolution of Denial` i`s included: how v4e /6e projefii� s scheduled for Design. Revie CcaiiG�ejrevia5r >:e(.ay �a, i9€1,. f its ^ChP Cb�gission desire to pr`tfr~ee , �±ith _prime °it�g: rrf��t4te`''rerris�d = t N'xsped ly� tdd`' ` q t V it , 1 ri ty PI nee., t BB:DM:'ko ,� s AttacHaents: Staff Report of October 14,.i987 Resolution of 6iei ° 1� 'I 1 ! OF RAJNCHQ f DATE: {W.,jbor 14, .198E � i477 1'0: Chaizsaan and ors of the Planning C ssioee FROM ' � Brad B�iler� C�t;R Planner BY: ,'Debra firer, A.soeiate Plantier k Suw' a: : ENV1Ri .'1fiTAti AM&91W Aiip TENTATIVE TRACT 13579 - AYJDU8 Y rteslaentlw a2veloron compris ng ` ot unfu on rl.bg acres of land sin_ the lediuele Residential = PLANWII* COMISM ;TAeT REPORT MITAMN TWT 13blg - AY0UB tberr 14, 1987 Page 2 F. parkin 'Calc0ations: Nuebar�'af; Humber of Type c spaces of use Ae i Prrovidad if three- b�,dreom units =} l i (2.'3 x, 9) 18 18 enclosed Tota9 `40.25 x gt �- 2.2 3 open II. AIMYSIS: t. A. Geverai; Tr�a townhouses are dasiW, in t►irei levels, two s o of° living spacer ove, aL two-,; , "'garage. The ur(M ore provided "within taro buildinys , Private open space for each unit consists of entrance patio god tWo rear balcdN ies. tin- site aueenitiers_ are clustered to the rear pa►tion of: the site, including polo spa, sun deck, tot lot and opgh play area. AWL B. Oesign AvII roearittee: 1646 Grdect was pri�tntsd ,to t;fe�t Design ROVI ear Ibierick, Builer, Col n) on ,Auorst 4a 1987. The Cowittes detc -m0ned that vtrious architectural and site plan revisits 'ttessary.���hespe:cfic concerns:, �reree ,- 1. CO"tt"'s °as: The site d+asign is. very tight and, does noz allow suf cient perimeter, landscaped area or adeaaate l andscapi MI along that ends of the buildings. Soul alternatives mW be to gain eaaergency access to the earth through the AltA,V0ods prAojtct or eliminate a Unit. 11 �lic ot`s RUpoedt4: The appl -Icant did try to ga,JV r."nclr scras$ to then rro,*ttr onto , e Alta i(oods towa�r proje:t. The Homieowner's Association for the pro itft den%►ed his reepost.' Rat er than deElbte a rani;, ; the► a Pyir`atri►: is concentratf 0 %on all tC:e specOIC P'fobl+aki '`related :t* the dMe 6ess of the sate as a',escrlbredi in ideas- 2 end 3. The applicant, added`, t"o maple ;trees t* ea h' ene, of the b;rildInq adjacent to Hellman. However, tho pkanttri depth IS all for treo ±� and a tall r sugleSted. 9 "sh , tib, such as .,parpus i s 2..'Conittee'r Provide an appropriate landscape screen along the east property 1 iiaet to achieve private o Screening far'tG+r pool area fro thi Alta Wood project adjacent. PLANNING coWzssU MAF REPORT � TENTATIVE .M.T 13b19 - .AYOU8 October 14, 1981 \ Page J ABPug t s..x : fie landscape area along c., d Werth and Last of the pool and deck area ' cont.ins a continuous screen gf trees on i IS fb i r� centers. vhe vr64 proposgd are maple. Staff sugr t using a species' abrt adaptable to a;•,r c1148te. Liqui ar or S,ycaaoore would. p=?Ide a., sieifar appeatarce and ar* better suited for drought tolerance, COMMI ,' S's : The suds of each ,building additional archfttvturai treatont. ScM suggestiont discussed at the Mind included: a. Use of sfdfn sa !" puts on these elevaai.+:s. � •b• Gradi�ot ohan, ?a color from upper and lowsr levels of ,boil diirg. ,. c. fringinngg :;ht M4*ies around the co rnee of tfhe building. d. SM f0m of stucco triwof o details. - The tl�pplicaatds Itetpofte- applictrt has provi ed . ver�:ical wood siding with a horito l 2 x xU f'triv pi eca at stich floor l ev l . JJW = qt 'oing:. i s pal ntad, carrying out the blue -pay cal ®r - r,"Is�,of thc_ � ol;A Cape -Cod them of the ProOzt' 4. i "s oMM: ', ,4t w0l d also be saWabi t to add interest-,-"v the roof nine With changes in ridge locati ?. 4r Soft V$rticai aweiief ,-, es bring #ng the roof 1' t� at fie ec +dt of the btp2 tf�o . ;.d�deae3'x Masome; The mot line of,the end units has belies drops -vd 12 inches below the middlt port`ron of the-building, S. ', iC"Wt'"' t- -A :` : The planning Cowiic +fion polfe; .f e$d ►+a: 6 eu up&4de .all roof materiel to cntzrete the »r this partfeu.a:, Project the suggestinn wj�s .r. state colormt.afiat tile., licsutcs 14" 'goof,matmoial proposad,is now �.. concrets tilt. C. Technical ,IdeVilt Cofiteei ^ The Co. }fie r+vi�y� ,] F ew. ,4, ll 4r- pro�aet " i an a r .i s#andard Ctfn ii pns of approval and s ;tcial con itions as provided ine Oltt d, Resolution,,the ro14 s eonsiatent with i appit�ao ^ �' E standards and Ordirrxnces �� a PLO1114 GOMISSU ;GAFF UPORT , T1VT TMT 13519 — AYOUR Qc�4r ��� ��7 •� P490 4 D. Envfrtl welital Ass*xmmt: Pat^? j o � sfiti7� i e�1l:�► �f�lS it '� Staff ,.J,,� 1y,,ri� �[! } ,.pp 1 r.e+ ip ,�, I F, RTE —0t. Sta f a:.�tr �h ��F'e Part Xi q he virnf Cistatt found no aifit iscts) on on the $aviwor ea:t +.. i r yl,t of this F act* III. FATS FCk FI?OfWS- ;;fie act is cwslsteYt vith tho'Davaelopmat °an�3 v r ;�taroj wits rrct brt atatri Qtaa to ae4aceot 'P*o3rerti�y :; -trr :�er�e sigstificant i"��s, -, '`itre rropoge� usay tbgerroer aiiit recagdwendded �uiadi' dad# and *in-- ,} candi tf sxes = f a ax ire - cool Y�rt�e',. l�ri � applicable r l� regulations Ofj Iv' . ??B l l . 7his i w has bnarr s¢±rszrti3sd, as paeblic "ia9 _ L� ifa"3' ;'R ehdl "Wspoper�, Of Prop*rt�t ��4+� arrd tia�.. tr • p'rr prop" o+ftn t��ithi'l 3w i alt o;� thw a- ��� �P� va R C ATII c Staff ro co s ,that; the 41-ar Piffg GottN sr�fs t kY esp pp3"v' e3' 71 vO Tract 13079 suc act to =fibs cohditiorra pp Val, t h m t t�rr a then ktta� R�#Put°,1 f a ilegattv,ttlartiao _ Res e€tTy �r Oily armor Attachwnts: it " X" Wcatioa map It " to Sim OT* Removal Pii xhb ss l wAlblt V - Tr FLoval p*rtxit V -hibit "ti" —Cohddot t I Lairdicopirr Plea Fxttioit, "E" • Pratl i:f ' O,radirt P I >�x:ib�t,'Ft' �'ir�:tarrat �i�:e�attion "R" - dY ) lr"ie.yatioha aMiifiibit bit dew l P 00r ti on n•NWI of �>��aaras. nth- �o�raiiittr~s t' ` _ �1 t t � � U � `'i F1� J. _ _ '. '►"" !`�- tit ° /!; ii tl H- 1' - o i+S a'� vacs OP4lr9VS' r..r.ratisrr �1 SITE PLAN - tS xsta'Cl,tsw � �� i41Y.Y •wt.'• �7M r'O�`.'Y O:w / Stlmq�aNief] iqJ�,. raCVCG ./ ri°¢ +r ..iC3i i.3 Fiirlii vrsr�na a•�e� -ss +�::.,a.x'a •O r A :. •.ri wr.:t wn0 1��FQp afi aow� ",� 4}...Ywe� yr4Y LO�MyiO�M�ef1r�I7 .� jpmp;� ec� y �4 xOYLYMhQ.vN�Fr'S `•3 JCif1f 1 IN ' � �� }y�1�� rte. • � CF pp�i pp � � t� _ ,.i+r SCALE- r r.� City of Cucamonga 4<' a �I _; . Kemoval Permit, SVELOP r GENERAL INFO rAMATION' ORk'") RETHAN5 TREES OIA60 'UNEARFEETt9- WINDRO I Ordinance N6.278. pertaining to the preservation of trees on private pro "rty, requires t`s. no person I rea :ove or relocate any Moody plants in excess of f-f teen (15) feet in height and having a single trunk ci,,� mferance of fifteAn (16) inches or mitre and multi-trunks having a circumference of thirty (31, inche" or more (measured twenty -fou 1241 inches from ground levoi }, without Asst obtaining a Tree Remov' f Permit from the City. - ANT: TO BE +~QMPLic'Id'E[� eta APP��ANT: L0CATI0NOFSUBJECTSITE: 6649 Hellman Ave. - - - i NAME, ADORE$% TELEPHONE OFAPPLIOANT; P.ichard Ayoub. 6649 Fishman Ave, _ Alta Loma ,CA 91702 (714) 980 - 1220 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PROPERTY OWNER (if other that, applicar }; a sme I REASONS FOR REMOVAL (attach necessary sht eta): Trees are in the rro 2.3-10 ; f location cE bniTtjrlj ads., Er. TENTATIVE TRACTPlAP) � s +' OROPOSED METHOD OFHEMO°VAAL, Trim from b&iaht then d, tier APPLICANT1 ADI)ITIONAL FILING NEOUIREMENTS } i This application shaft incluCa &plot piai (rifteting location of ail'trees to be removed and retained. Ij The species, 114mtMf and sizaot the trees to be removed ,halt be co designated. (t a tree iJ (list's *�r� t, t than a wr�ttetVstatement from a licenved arborist stating the nature of the disease shall be reg6red. 0 f`- ACTION -- Eratuatiort got thin application is bases on the criteria on the raiverso side. Fti. i UJ 1 U APPROVED t 0 DENIED Reasons: ! Date: C( ( 1Nclification Of application shall be given t,),p prior to aipprdval. If no appr atx are recglv(td, tt .dr+ a� UJ : `T date of ac!Ion. This approved tree removal perr MMr fO or building permit issuanca, whichever comas day Period, a ne;4 permit shall be requirid. uri u' exavation of the peunil, SCALE.- f( ttl l i i l R ff 1 n i 1 4 f JAC. dp CF'. r •wasp M'a-, vtw SOW oel.!••N nrs o • -![. .w�wf• ;g rs. rarwwwt� �qac aes.ryfr a. w.e.a,Mu�rt s. •rre. qM. .r R I r �*, r..�. ..., s� r..rr. �,.. ��..'� •..�....a C3�y� �. _Y• ~ � Vii• �tlfs o. a1�1•. ll�Vlr vN .R+•r � _.. _ II � 1 %A A E RAUNCHO PLANNM .i.L_ J.�� it GRAVINO PLAN r�ctr rr. mai'.•. FTrI W 1 � • •,+. sMw 4T..ns ) i' • r t GRAVINO PLAN r�ctr rr. mai'.•. FTrI ice' W • •,+. sMw 4T..ns rt :�nu�a/Y'Ff�W:' ice' t i r t I 1 1 � J FIRES TRUCK ACCESS FLAW. Liam - TT_ lIIIII����FF WOW, k AL fill ii; lriil.' IN rt 1' .1 GARAGE FATNY Vial w11f �raesaen+..� r l IYY�I�AIIIM'r1��{] X EVA." n +v u d r SOUTH iE$,dMATiadA V li{V� sie�a�ipx� � ! Tt�sYl]d�iCal►�: >Il�1tA9tQtP,. Sl i1 M YZ MOW CL EX ...........:� /0701-02 0 1 -- 27-88 PC Agenda 2� of 6 A 'R OLUTIORP Of THE PLANNING CGA tSSlCiii OF tTNE CITY OF RJIkiCtlCl Ci0CAi4OliTrA DENYING Tli� TEOii� Yix TRACt OHO. 13679, A � gULTI -FMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELO , vA PRISM O F � - .'%ID'S ON 0.69 ACRES OF LANO IN THE MEDIC) RESIDENTIAL DISMICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE). ,, 1.00,iTED ON THE EAST SIDE GF HL•'LUM AYEME, t 325' NOUM 10F 19TH STREE `i AND MKING PINDINoS IN SUPPLAT THEREL. A. ;Recitals. (i) Richard AYaub has filed an application requesting the approval (� of Tent:;tive 'Tract No.. 13519 is described above in the °-title of this Resolution. HereInditer in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Flap request shall be referred,;to as the "Apniicatigm.l {ii) On October 14* 1987, the Planning Commission of. the City of Rancho Cucamonga condticred a duly noticed public 'hearing on the Application and said public heartno was continued at the request of the applicant. (M) On Januar3 13, 1gW,-the Planning {s5ion conducted a r public hearing and continued, tit project. The Commis( directed staff to prepare 4 R40lution of Denial should the applicant \� t s,00it' a revised application." ` f'f r (iv) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption o this ReSoi <<ition have occurred. , .r r' i B. 'Resal ution. NOW, �THEREFORE, =it, is found, detenvine4 and retol ved by the Planning Commission o� the City of Rancho Cucaaronge as follows: . I, In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part R, of this Resolution. � r _ 1, 2. Based upon the substantial ravidence presented -to the Planning Commission daring the above - referenced public hearing, including written` and E oral staff reports, toosther th public testimony this CommioMen.,hereby specifically finds as f4lows; a. The Application applies to .aproxiawtely 0.69 acres of land within the Medlun Residential District located on the east side of Hellman Avenue, north of Nineteenth Street; V r t .- F1 PLANNING COMMISSION REW)LUTlON NO. '• RE. TT 13573 - ,AYOUB Page 2 b. ibe pimoparty.to the W6 of the subject sit¢ is located within a Medium Residential, District and is developed as a driveway and landscaped area •atccsring thd'Alta Woods Townhouse development to the east of the subject site. The property to the south is located within a Medium Residential Distrust and cartains an existing: single ' family residence. Tie property to the East is 10- ated within thi Medium Residential District developed with multi - family townhouse style rrfs%vzces. The property to the west is located within the tots Residential BlitricG and is currently developed with single family residences. )1 C . The application as submitted proposes the development of nine dwelling units of 1331.83 square fcet of living. area for each unit. The total square footage of building area on the site (including garages) is 15,966.18. Amenities include swimming pool, spa, barbeque facilities and tot lot. The net site density is 13.0 dwelling units per acre which is permitted using the Optlanal Development Standards of the_. Development Code. The proposed nine dwelling units is the maximum number of units that could be allowed within the Ned -fuse Resldentek? District (8-14 dwelling units per acre). d. The Appl ication • `a!w contemplated 'would be contra,,ry to' the goals and objectives oil both the Gerseral Plan and Development Coded tine City of Rancho Cucamonga foil the following remsonsc (i) The .1-11,ftienal Development stan0.ards w,Ii�thin the Development Code are. provided to allow development at the higher ,end of the designated density range.- These standards are intended ft achieve a superior ' quality and compatibility for developments cf such prajectf,. The standards and expectations are above and beyond that which is ba3ic�lly required to ensure transitions and buffer frog lower intense residtntia° uses. The Application, as contemplated has a density of 13.0 dwelling units ,.-r acre. The existing multi-family development to the east is at a density of 11.3 dwelling units per acres with the remaining neighbo* hood in the density range of 2 -4 dwelling waits per acre. the Planning �oumisF;on determined that the density of the site Ys proposed is not compatibly tai tr« adjacent p-operties. transition from one land The project., a other, pobutA instod provide a gradual contrast. As an infill site, this project must reflect the character of�the overall neighborhood. The Hellman Avenue - :neighborhood character is that of low-pro-File single family residences which is rot reflected in the 30 -foot tall by 796-foot long building located at the Hellman Avenue stncct frontage. (iii•) The proj eC , as proposed, does not relate the mass and scale of the building proportior;4, y to the site size, stree,, setback and open space. The 30-foot tali x 794cot lcng building is located at the minimum street setback allowed. Larger buildings such as this require m6v* setback area for a balance of scale with the adjacent single family uses. The landscaped open space on the project site is basically limited tie the front setback and the rear 23 feet ,.%f the site. The open space does not appear to Am b VWL e an Integral part of the project, designed to enhance building design, as well ie polite thews an the site, Many of the landscape planters that are inte"rded to bu'fe i ' r arge ,wilding walls or adjacent prgpertics a t 3 feet or 4 feet in Width tftich'r+ky inl3bit Sant growth. '! s PLANNING C$'*ISSION RESOLUTION No. RE. TT 135R'4 A71OUR - . page 3 . (iv) She r-- ttectural rh,:racter of the prujeCtL, as proposed does not prmote the platrning Commission's expectations of_s4oerior Quality basOtd on the Des,gn Guidelines and Developmer►t Standards of the Development Code and General Plan. The structure is basically block in farm with little vau`iatior in roof outline. The Freight, ail feet, and bulk are not rgpresentativctcif the Hellman Avenue streetscape. (v) 'rite ulti density a`ilowed within any residential density range shalt bie detet�t r ' through tie Development Review pro;ess and; pub, d hearings,. nC =PTang1 -r Crttytaissirn, having, the right of dfscreti.oaary approval, determined that, �s - Proiect did net provide the pro�;� transition between 'land use distrfe4s nor caapafibility 'Odth adjacent residential development. 3. Based on the substar:tial evidtoce precented to this Comission during the above - referenced bearing end upon the specific findings of fact set forth in paragraphs 2 and 2, above, this Couaniassion hereby finds and concludes as follows. rf a. The Application, as propose; li,, of In cosormance With the goals and policies of the General Man and Mivelopment Ccde of the City of Rarvcho Cucamonga. 4. Rased upon the findings and conclusions set forth ��?paragraphs', 1, 2 and 3, above, this. C mission. hereby denies,the Application. 5, the Deputy - Serretary, of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall certify to the a- Sapticti of this Resolution. AMVED AND A3 rIE0 THIS 27TH VAY OF JANUARY" 2988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITE OF RANCHO CIEGAFIf3KA &Y., arry e , a Man ATTEST: ra u er, e-vi y re ry I, Brad Buller, Deputy Se;retary of the planning Commission of the Citi -lof Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was dttly, and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Flaming Cission -of "the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the planning Commission held on the 27th dty of January, 1988, by the following vote-to-wit, AYES: COMMONERS: NOES; COMh1��ION£2S: ABSE T*. COWSSIDNERS: ;,I DATE: January! 27, 10��� 1977� TO; Chairtaan and; Misers of the Planning Csiss e FROM: Brad Ouller, City Planner, By, Scott Murphy, Associzte Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT" ANO 'TENTATIV,E TRACT 131'27 - 7: res a s s an o s n e, aa� y -o s "on a :53 acres of land Jo ire Ln�. "Resi den tial District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre), Tea ated' at, the sou }st Comm' of Carnelian Street-an Ili 4r Avenue -APB 201 214 -1. I. PROJECT AN SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action_ Regaested- Approval of subdivision 't a g,ks, conceptual ' grading plan, `- n'issuartce of a Neg: "ive Declaration. B. Project ��sfaity: '3.4 dwelling (�ts per acre C. Surroundinci_ Land Use and Zoning north ingse ata 1Y > es en , a1 s Loss R 7idential (2 -4 dwelling units per ac South Future Foothill Preeway� ovlRes�/lidential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre East - VAM—t Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per :acre) West VAcant,� Low Residential -4 dwelling units per acre) . D. General Plats Designations: Prrojec e P c—i :es"i s en i al (2 4 ddwelling units per acre) North Low Residential (2 -4 dt+� ling units per acre) South - Freeway East - Low Residential (2 -4 dwi liisq units per acre) ,Residential (2- 4West Low ing units per acre) E. Site Characteristics: The site is currently vacant with an average shape o. percent from north to south. he project is bounded�on the south by the future. Foothill Freeway, on the north by Highland Avenue,: and on the east.by Carnelian Street. IM E aLLANhIIA CliISSIO. N' S[AfF REPORT Vt Fg S L47 4NJ* 11 {ENTAgY .. January 27, 1988 t, page 11. APIl YSIS: A. Bach raved: On October 24, 1984, the planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit to develop, tiro site as a church facility. The plans Consist '-mf a 8,400 square foot sanctuary and two 2,250 square foot ulti-purpose buildings. The church has since decided not to usO the site and to -sell the property. B. General: The applicant is proposing to develop 12 loss ranging in size from 7,7:4 square fee's to 13,038 square feet in area. The average lot size within the tract is 9,895 square feet in area. The tract is designed with a cul -de -sac at the east Bpd j of the site serving four (4) lots and an L- shaped street on f%e western half of the site serving eight (8) lots aad providing a connection for the property io the west. No dwelling unita. are �> being proposed at this time. C. Resign Review Comaittee: 'rhe Design Review Cociittee a es ty� MCKle u er reviewed the proposal on August 20, 1987. At tnat time, 'the Comrmtittee regorAend�d the following- r -` conditions be attached to the project: t, 1, iDecoasative black walls should be provided along ` Highland Avenue and Carnolian Street and along All, corner side yards. 2. Landscaping should be provided between the sidewalk and the wall along all comer side yards. 3. Lot 1 should take access riff the street to the south. k Lot 8 should take access--w the Voreet to the west. In addition, much Cicussion during the aeoting focused on the wall along the south tract boundary tvcommended by the acoustical engineer to mitigate the potential noise frost the Foothill Freeway, The acoustical analysis indicated that an 11 foot high wall (as measured from the building pad elevationy would be necessary at the west end of the site stepping dorm to 10 feet high at the east end of the site.. The Committee expressed concern over the impact that a wall of thiai size would have on the fut +fre resident,. � j The Committee also expressed concern about the aesthetics of the wail as viewed from Carnelian $treat. to addition to the F 10 to 11 foot hfgh sound wall, a retaining wall is propos`ad ' c along the south tract boundary. The necessity of the retaf.'ing PLANMING COHMIS Jr 4 $TAfF REPORT " a TENTATIVE TRPCT I3727 - "JMSSERS _.. 4anQVrj 27i 1988 1 Page .B W411 stoma froeibttne ``�Jsufficient distance between the futture an -raahs and the tract b0M(Wry causing a� retainittig wail ranging 1 from aeM' to seven (7) lei, in height ibis, ipl coaabination whit ttieaund wail,,rults�� in an �owerall wall height between 10 and 16 feet abcve1h* existing grade. The impact of thx ,1 _ _tr�tll As further - ,compounded, b� the freeway, ing depressed in � �afiS area. late ta. the si�nif; ant fief t ofd Proposed wall., MO-Design,-Rev ew I �Ae���� rec2 ei' ga 1 1. A profile of the wall should be provii ! for o0sign Review C'oWttee review, 2. A design for the well �hauld be submitted fbr Design ,Review Coeaaittee review prior to the planning' Commission, mieetl . The - design should �i include the type of "Color,' retained planter boxes, vertictl Unds��ape materials, and/or other featuret ntcoss ry to mitigett- *ho impact of the well from both the north an<l sout:r i!fta. 3. Caltran ., should o caritacte \ te' exp ore „ 'the possibility; of ihstalling landstoping wfthin the freevoy right- Of_wey. Sebse uentlY, the hell n Revie4 Committee EadaMck Tolsto y l.o evin rev ei'" " li 1 wa 'cies`l' n an'Tr e' "e�"aRpr su lic o "'b i7e`""s ucca a-"Fi +cl`sp$ t-Tace ca . Staff recomnosi However, az: "a T"4 'SIgn of tie wa be revieweA.and approved by the Planning Cowailssion prior to the `issuance' of building petits, Phis action would be consistent with recent approval% of other p A,ects #long,the freeway corridor in omen to pravitGit similar wwM design. Q. Technical Review Committee, The Technical Revie,\apittee reviewed a propose on just 18, 1887 and noted one area of the tract that is not consistent With City standards: and policies -- existing overhead sptilitjes. There are overhead Utilities located on the apposite Side of Carnelian Street. As a rssuit, an in -ljou fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of tfie utt-11ty lines on the opposite side of Carnelian Street will be required. The amount of the fee will be one -half the adopted ;a nt times the length from the tenter of highland Avenue to 04— center of the future fee of -way. right- With this additional item being addressed .and other conlittons Of approval, the Technical Review Committee determined that the tract is in compliance with,applicable standards and policies. C? , c E -3 r , PLANNING Ct2MISS ON ST'AF'F REPOkT TENTATIVE TRACT. 3727 - JANSSENS January 27) 19W Page 4 E. EnvironmenvO Assessment: The applicant has Completed Part I "►a ci'°'ilte ai"i°' u , , Staff has ,completed {Part.. II and identifit one urea of potential adverse irpact - noise. Dot )) . to (le proximity6of the site to tho, fu€Are Foothill Fregway, " the tract will ;� eyposad to noise levels in excess of `city Stan Hs, : An acdusticai "analysis has been submitted to _ address possible witig&tZon measures to reduce the nGlse to e level of a lest than significant impact. Based W*; he recowendations.bf the report, a sound wall along the south tract boundary ranging 1n height front 11 feat (as measared fry„ the building~,pad ~Aeration) aiw tk west end stepping Own.to ten (10) fett at the east end of the site would be necessary to redo, , the hone level below 65'C)JEL (the City Mir ). With Oe inclusion of the recommendations of the .acoustfical analy,,is, staff finds that the prudect, together with, the conditions of approval, will not have a signifit #nt impi�vt on th3 "environment. If`the P14nning Commission concurs,, issuanac. d , of a fiegativ,,�,,Drlaration would be• appropriate:, III. FACTS FOR,FIWINGS: The project is consist -int with the General., an anu Development Code. The projn will not be detrimental to the public health or safety, or cause, miskaces or signi�Ndint: adverse emironmentel impacts. In addition; -the pro ssed use and sit$ Flan, together with the rewarded Conditions.,of'.p�+roval, _ are in compliance with applicaMe provisions of the Development Code aid City standards. , IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised #n,�be OaI' tre rt r,ei�spape' r ds a vabli° i�gnd notices haVa then se" 'no�€� property owners within 3. feq the of site. := �1 V. RECOMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Cammj4sio'd approve Tentative 'Tract 13727 through adoption- of the Mashed Resolution with conditions and issue a Negative PftUrat '. Resp ully bat ed, i or 13 City fanner f� G BBRSM:te " Attachments: Exhibit 'A, " " Site Utilization Map' .Exhibit "S" - Subdivision Map =, "C" Exhibit - Grading Plan Exhibit "b" x fkster Plan Exhibit "E" - Letter, from Applicant Resolution of ` Approval witrl Conditions ';,= E T1Sa FX$ TELL (Nt{1�b3/ : i7p 1RA6T Ixt �LL6 Gm f30/71-73i -4, °`.�—" —�. ---- --...; ,x.,.3.0►. y....,E-- +%r'`" ; j t � � < � �� �{ A*V'! r Jwt �l , '>�u�ah as ;+���; c ',r Mlt ugc�t.� zauf:,e►rt $ i E l` Cirli Qf, � �� RA.NCW Cu SCAL lit i I zap: =c-i0csou 8 so+r dlk*w .> ko too TV t ! ! ar�r �sM6aer j �Aass+V u AC CITY OF R o y�'.asd�r - F''�.,AINNI.NG i�tl'1SjEE !",," riTi.F.= ay CITY OIF TM.E.- PUNNIN EXHIPAT. SCALL s , r r } ,• 1 ' t i S� s t II AE IL iL CC .r.'ai A- DRISIQ EXHIBIT, _L 9C ALE- E t t t t t � v , t t t � t t . t t i t t E a R CL A NC A TM.�= .G - F�R'��.:� ��� t , �a: . r ' REAL TAB �igvSMMRs , n � • s k'*.t�. Eel 1911 `' � .• �� t' �doxeova�RG�A'�}lO3B o R 6tIii�� --- —1 Mr.. 4cott � Murphy. City of Rancho Cucamonga, c' 3324 Baseline Rdi � Rancho Cucamonga., CA. 'Mae =v Dear Seottx 11 4 , It has been requasttd of tae tisav °Y paj 50% of e it undergrounding cost 61 the pover 141neo 'fa0i.ng my projac-t TR X13727 aaross Carnelian' Ave: The distance or_ the a ndergroun4tng fox -14� T would have responsi�i2�ty runs from the ati4dle of H��i►1 d Ave. to the middle 'Of,, the pr'aposed freeway co the so�tb I Tk 13727. it t, fi Ag'ttxi3 ie' very serl.eaus�U`!d`'n If ora 121hom; tract ar-4 ainn6 Caltrana 4"l kvzosa.tital ' un4rgro'6na &!.I lines crossing their:, :TAgh��of dray,; may I re� \#*st that this requirawiaat be am-ended, tax, my undergaeounding�IfjMam the c","°r of Righlan4 to the rq�' let ty _�ropev-ty line di;1� TR 1372 ' Tuis amen ("Wq s i1?�: ? eve s �4gnificant cost to be alistrbed '� a tutUtlke �dffact will be leas cr3pplia a F 1' thank gu'a this urgent r2,�; -tes k. Eris A. Jans'n;�r ii o 1 J f RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION& OF. THE PLANING .00MMSTA4 c'r' THE'CITY OF C!l MC40 MA MM* T-tk* 11W T MAP NO. 13x2'7, A RESIDEp1TI& SMIYISIOW 6F"-' 2 SINGU FAMiILY LOTF-10M, 3.63 ACRES OF LM IN 7fiE LOW RESIOENTTAL OISZ' ict, - AF THE SOUTHWE T, _CORMER, OF HIGHLAND, AV ME .AND, - ,CARNELIAIi STREU IN-7 d "ReSIDEXTIAL 61ST41CT - AP11: 201- 21411. A. Recitals. (i) Et4c Janssens ha:r fi td al appt�cation for the jppr^vat of Tentative Tract Mai. No, '13727 as de &cribkd.in the title of 4thiS 'Resolution. Hereinafter In this Res olut oki , - uj -,subject .Tertatfve Rap r*�;t _ $ referred to as *the appl icatios Sj (ii) On tht� 27th of 3arivary d 198+3r the Planning C '' " of the City of Rarcho Cucawongga- �onductrd .a duly .noticed public hearing •on, t;4+ appi','rr °ion and concluded stiia i:earfng on.•that`date,, .,f) All legal prea.quisites to Ue •adoption of this Resolution have rri:�. R':a J ution, ROW, THEREFORE, it is berebs touted, determined and resolved by the }_ FTaniiing Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as folTftst° 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds -that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolcftion a;^e tNe and correct. - o 2. aastd .upon substantial evidence presented to this Coww' seion during the above- r6Virented public hearing on January 27,, IM, including z written, and oral si;aff .reports, together faith :public testimony:, ibis C iG ={�sn hereby specifically find.! as f�jlo►ra; (a) The application applies to property leca�ed "a, tild southwest corner of Highland Avenue and CarneiiMl ,street V.th a street . frontage of 696 feR% and lot d€pth of ,273 feet and is pNesentll vacant= (b) The property to the riorth south, oast and west cee Zoned for residentfiAl uses. The property to .the north Is developed Wxt single,,,: family residences and the property to the south,, east and west ari; °curr�ntlp vacant. Thr property to thn south I$, the fut-ure-`FoothilI Freewq. (c) The project, -with witP� the recok%ended ccnditioos of appreVal complies witW all minimum doLgIlopnent sti rndards of the V,4 y ai` >; ,fiancFo Cucamonga; and ,t (d) The development of 12 sing% - amiiy lots on s.rs3. ��res of o' t( land is consistent with : hie 'Low Residential land use dnsignatfor� General Pl arf Pi.lNNIM C4W $1014 -REOLUTIOW K3. TT 13717 - JAN #S Jixnuary 27, 19$ -' , Paw 2 3. BAsed upon the substantial evidence presented talhis Comission during the abov#,,- referemed public hearing and upon the specific findings of $acts set VQrth 1 in P[raigraph I and 2 4*Ve, this Comission 'harebV finds and concludes as followsa (41 'Mat tentative tract Is consistent with the seaerad plait, Revolopmot Cade, and specific plans; .and 141 the design and dorov nts 'of the tentative tract. =.I tiSesistQnt; wi the BengrrFl Plans - DevelOpeent £ode. and sr'eaifie plans; and W , -mod site is physiq�,-`Cy suitable far the tr rpa of derpl"fit pt t "cd; 3FSi (d) `ne dusv'".- f the :L' division is rat likely to _. causery�. stantfai e.Iviromehtal dm ' and avoVs a injury to hugns and Wildlife or z fr hwaitat; and fi?e Tpre tentative tract is not likely to caS,�e s::rioos Pe5lit M1alth problem; and If) 7bc desi n �O the tentative tract will not conflict with alts easeatnt acquired by the public at large, now of w� ord, for access throu or �� �d.� of to Ptdi w3th�lr�: the I prapgsetl sulldivt'�en. . 4. Ws Cmission bertfsy finds and certifies that afire project has been reviewed and ca-isiderad in coVila4ce �dlth the Ctlifornta EaivirornAental! C Quality Act a 197t1 iind, fug er, this CoWssion hereby issues a negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findfngs end corrOlusions Set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, thic CoMission hereby aparoves the application subject to each and every dondYtion set fort:a Wow C1 in thie'�attacheu Standard. Conditions attachrd hereto aiad incorporated herein by this reference. E (a) Planniog n,visir9 1. Decorative block walls shall be required along H ghliInd Avenue, Carnelian Street, and all corner side yalyds. Jhe 'location and design of „ the walls shall he shown on the floai "landscape ° P'l'an, which is subject to review and app oval by the Cit,4 Planner prior to the issuance ' of building penwits, y 1 I,3 ( -'.- COWISSEOK RlrSo.#nom No. I� 1`T 15727 - JANS*MS n January. 27. Page 3; Awk 2. Lands6apIng shall be= required between the sirlMIt and the wall on. all corner side .yards. The final lan *cape p1 ns shall ' be . reviewed and approved by the City anner prior to the issuance of building permitsil f => Tat drive", on dart ' 1 shall, Me „cass off of the street's the south. / . L a. The driveway on l,ot •il sha1V='take access off of the street to the w-st. . S. A sauna wail. as required by the acoustical analysfs, sholl bs :installed along the 3QCith tact boundary. Theji"T dexm of than wall be reviewed and approved by the Planning-; a its to .the issuancecof building ,` b� 6. A final acoustical anclysis shall be•required to identify necessary rite 1 onaasures to reduce the ooi*e , levels r thin i4 ;,residences below CUM. zu�� 111 be revle ° and aoprpv2 by the ty, 1anr prior to the Issuance of buildin'g'02' „ s. ib3 Engineering Oft i slon � . L An in-1 feu fee as cr'2t�ibution to the future underground, o 1/ t -1a„ existing ovek+*ad OtMil i ttes Etel- ln, a find el eetrice�� on n thr opposite side ar eIlan 5ira,c r�iTl be paid to„ the iii rior'� tc ing iss�rance of building ,,permits. i�e tee' shall be ono. elf the City a6pted unity,amunt tins the length < 1 from ' #tie 66ntar of Alghland Avenue to the center of Cal Trans future Foothill Freeway j 2.. The slim. drain pipe shall be designed to carry a capacity of Q100. 3. The cat haslns shall be dasigped with u -} ;f capacity of 1.5 Q1a0. 4. A: ,permit will be required from the`fttropolitar Wer District for any word; within ►�fr right_ zo y _ �i ,: i n <� � I C �# RESC� UTIOR. NO. - - =.— -� � J , Set tai��i s� ag sfi imn shall certify to the acMptiort of this Res Q uti �. i PLt4iiN* Cgf+l USSION OF 'ME CXTY OF COCAH ,1 By. arry' a ATTESf s BF13 aulleri 'i,'lepuTy rya I, Brad 8011 r~ Otputy Secretary of the Plifi knsq emmission of the City Qf Rancho Cucaatofr9a, Od' hgtthy certify! that the fam pofng Resolution was duly 4nd regularly Introduced, W,lssed acw adapted, by the Plamaifng Co issi" dF the City „f='Eancho Cuc� `a ,, at reguliw awing of the Planning Owmfssion hails on the 27th day pc,,f� 4am�►ryr� l9f, by the following vote -to� -wit: AYES: COIi�'`ISSIt ks: I/ ! N13ES. Ct1l�il�SbtRj;�1S: ABSENT _ 'Ci1MSS1016, TI 1 is kv�.,: e� d • V r�w� yy$w PA tlw �r s i ��3 :031 \ tat ~A�$ i Ira s �t y `ItNfd g'1u+l qa I4 M ti iTS+T�� Rjaids-i-if Uir`',f$ p A ju Hag� lit 'R z3 no `u 0 N - y �. -- _-=1 ��, u �Z �$w 15 ru, s +� I p . i;O -! a ^•'14 �+ 4� sites AT _ is4N 06�L4 4 M� Ai- -�M s� " as U P, ,.:.w -.. a. � y„� N w� l�ij� b JA, Y < " � � f!2 N � t rr.. s P N we ' y:. '�' $. Ief a % Wit If5i 4 J-1 EI =��V r,. " SM . 96 i. f r Ps ��pj i� � i1 q[ to yy • �s ww fill- K.r MY 'N .CV �O TT. M44 kill", M as: E- is ag e° •�:m {���`,�1E'1(rs.��L}y"` .Sr \3+ �' R �RGI may° 111 :�5.1 !1j;j " a i ��Y +. Y �. �pw G. �r+�b,NM{�it M4i �aaF•, g.A�� �� �'ti1w� Zi) � cewr"x i)0� Nam 'S. 1� r''w s^ i+ ■ f 49 luau itMN c. �WV �WM� RN YI.N �Nv ���M/► 44� � i4 ���11 i� og Y erg Zs j a rye iii 3C ITS _13 if 9,pp, 'R . 4 Y . a . _ . fi � 167. 1u D? � 'w aw ``O rt 4 LN M R 6 M M 3 A all 96 lux a lua yyu N�� a � ji •S3$ �� w�iu ^�tl�.�YM M ^av S'. 'begy Ya�r +ru0 als? A4, c r�tpp. =yZ.zaN4 xkl go ,46� �4 *OYr+,� g2 r��•N ,Z!jR� 4Y ai S#1. 4gyti wt:a. Q ^�1�1 sill a-91 Y ysa ft? 411 rL I M. t 10116 Y "�•�. ) T Mil f g g „� g Ali `Sint.' - 1% si P__ ���� � � �w+�* PVC '� �iR� ��` i Q9' r�L• �N� FFt p+- a :N�. Y, �. p° w”. � � n � p r+ � �! �'• - ;� 7R o �i � My _. , t pyyy}p�m� ggq �jy y ,by �g� M fix/ 1r gqu a�. ay+ � w. w� V aj It 31[ , if] y C4 tC L o 5C Ya.4 �t y" 6 i �1 /• IN 9�0 ESN Ndi 4«e } ut SZ 7w• �l v la��$ y o CIL NEW "Xn 21 Q Y Jam► O O I�� a a g %I, 3 `l s. g 'x9 ail gay Y lam?.: ���,� M l Y � �� �M!_•� � c ��� _ r a � 5 i N �i Mgr -a. -2T ,at .r.2 g� 3- N y dp`i VN f e4 b Y Qy � B�'. � u �V�N•e ��G L� � C m TY g Yy s N I i_ i 34 � pp7S O.. .1 yy s iim r�Y! =iE' g ii� WNl, WY `r 11 �7 a a g %I, 3 `l s. g 'x9 ail gay Y lam?.: ���,� M l Y � �� �M!_•� � c ��� _ r a � 5 i N �i Mgr -a. -2T ,at .r.2 g� 3- N y dp`i VN f e4 b Y Qy � B�'. � u �V�N•e ��G � C m RUIN I i a a g %I, 3 `l s. g 'x9 ail gay Y lam?.: ���,� M l Y � �� �M!_•� � c ��� _ r a � 5 i N �i Mgr -a. -2T ,at .r.2 g� 3- N y dp`i VN f e4 b Y Qy � B�'. � u �V�N•e ��G ti Or 9!u �� �M M � • N $ V i,1yi r N � a 34k; r u Hit- a OEM jai 42 A M r , ` r t o m He x: qz a► w :t w :w iT, �7 m , x pp N , �l _4 N 6 8« U , _ IN ii IS I t 4 X11 .1 wi lV e+'f - .9 is it 11-5 1 1V 1i I t� Thus v3 lit "ijk i N Y y AiZ filar IN N: yy� m I Ic pw S� i <.r « t, u X. �IRZ _V ! _ 4 L r -� '» it's» Off Kn �w -1 < lt: "If 64 4 « K v o� f- Ed AS Z a a LS GV~ N C �r TAAA a �W ■aL, 7� Ic pw S� i <.r « t, u X. �IRZ _V ! _ 4 L r -� '» it's» Off Kn �w -1 < lt: "If 64 4 « K v a a �� TAAA a If Elie =1 Q =.. kill qM{�l +on! 4L itII tbR DATE: TO: FROM: BY,, SUBJECT 13 I. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT January 27, 1988 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Scott Murphy, P.5sociate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSES iT- =��AND T €NTATITRAGT 13359 cos oma o su r s on of-> J - -acres of TncT Intro 6 parcels in the Very Low Residential District--Sless than 2 dwelling units per acre), located,on,�the east side of Sapphire Street, south of Hiliside itoad - APN: 11061- 691 -9, 10 and 11. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE 8..7 -15 WALTON A request o reduce average a max m m avera Tol~y`?xe r'�,500 square feet in area to .21,392 squaw feet in area in ` corj unction with a six (6) lot subdivision located on the east side of d- apphire Street, south of Hillside Rdad APN: 2061 - 691.10 and 11. BACKGROUND: &6jctober 23, I997 i;ha Planning Co mission conducted a pu5l—ic —Weariftj to consider the Terttttive Tract and Variance applications, During the hgaring, an area resident expressed concern about the 6,,kjnage of the site down Turk Street and about the current General Plan "Pa, t'" designation. As a result f these concernsf -:the Planning Commission continued the Tentative Tract and Variance applications to allow staff to address the two issues, 0 November 10, 1987, staff presented information to the planning Commission addressing the site's Park designation. = -Rased on information and correspondence received from the ComOunity,Services Departaent, this site is no longer being consider, -d as a potential park site and that the Genera Plan designation should be charmed_ Therefore, staff fee'l's' that the tract map could be appro:red contingent upon aprroval cf a General Plan Amendment removing the Park designation (see staff report dated November 10, ?987). At Vie same November 10th Meeting, staff indf0ted that the applicant submitted a drainage report, but all necessary information bad"' not been obtained to address the downstream flows. As a result, the item was continued to allow staff time to irk with, the applicant° to ,assess the glows on 'mirk street. Subsequent continuances were as r`o allowed on De e:0er , t987 and January 13, 1988 to complete the"�ralnage analysis - ITEM F G 4 i� � J � % ` n KAk#l1hG GOMr' SS1W STAFF REPORT ✓' RE: TT 13359,0- WAl TOR " >' January, 27, 1988 lei PaS� 2 r k ._ » YI. ANALYSIS: Staff, �taE�: t�evie?r�ed �e la�*"est drainage (see a ace copy) suwtted by the applicant. Based om that revi w, that }v, staf4'rfeels '#fat the drairfagi study submittevi by the'applictnt °s Engineer -iacka sufficient detail to determine precise downstream _drainage protection measures. °1* drainage rep�rr n fd+�tas tpf� there- �appears to be suffirientcapnc {4 in the street to pre'.* floeh�tng Of the he s. Out td the complexity of the situdti , however there is not adequate tike to prepare and:review,,the lever €rf , detailed report nr;cessaryzto'as3ure that flooding rairT not occur and, if it will occur; What exact ueasures'c4n, l6 implecumtcd,to peotect the:` hOUSes in specific lo6tions. 11heretore, in *-ider to avoid indefinite conti uansees, as ig the pi- t, c !nd to :,?lot+ resolutiore o-F the other issues related to this projec't-;� staff recommends teat a confiition be placed on the! proieh requirfng a detailed study and ft'g installation of droinaje facilities, proper subject to_the appravai of the City Engineer, prior to r rdatton , of the final reap. Engineering Division S iii ,; ItICEIVED JA�E'�� ' B�aina'e Re ors c n xent. Tract No. 13359 LM OF #u4f W Existing Condit onsp The watershed area for this project, contains 3.8 act+es oiisiteP 142, acres offsite locatcd, westerly, and an = sandeveloped 4.3 acre �arcol offsite locate{'. north4rlyo The total watershed area drainage to tj }a 3outhea�4t cU der' of .-the proJect inclgdes 9.3��zcrts. Except ear front yards yJ n'offsiteresels fronting Sapphires truetov4ich -Pay be graded to draizz to S�ep�+iairg straeat. the grope€zty wi hin thee'- watsershed areas 4lopev ratrursi �' at_6 to ..7 percent to 'the southeast corner _ "the p,00je0t.' Drainage improveiaaentsr were constructed in 1077 -78 iniiiudtf q a 16 inch storm drain in conj6hation with an overland ° drainage C` ditch to ia"d ce�tt n4,� c6nduct flows from, there southeast corner of the projeect to dittl,et onto Turk Straat.loaatesl gout 400 feet' . easterly. Theo 7tarr�'�iin area provided vitz Y de�el,���a€��it of the eliamenta;..y school site �northe�rly► and �t" ;drrink ,, ditch' � was provided `with development of Tract 915 soui,h+erij-�'� These y; drainage improvementg were built to •sat?Vfi trava ek. of Anticipated t�yt .flowe.) from thel +-southeast core ar of the project- toaifi�ly and E \. adequately t6,,Tti:,* Street. Redirection of tie fiovsa .to another outie *1 is nett "considered a workablea, possIbil_it ttnd "K4ul.d `from require deviations the established P�isto c' drainage pattern. ,/ The :'low5 outlettAid 'to Turk Stroet.,aiaa .conducted as normal s"rfac:e,,fiowss within this street section dovnstream about 2tadl0 , feat, to outlet as the Deamon* Channel. Street improvamentz were built within, this dovnstr ream reach to contain: Rows within the street section ;includin4 mitigatf,�n ^meearsure as increased curb heights to d and 10 inches, increased elevation of building pads above streets 010 and zshieldea� drive 4. proack_es to prevent raiag3ng.:' This drainage watesrshed` area is "N e$latively 'th4retare warrant confined and does not addition+'al drainage facilities such as underground drains in order tot- :deci''��3ately conduct the flows. PROJECT MALYSISs AttaAh>tenta indicate that 47 «1 cfs would outlet onto „Turk Street 4Urincg the major evewts storm with calculated e ainfrsil intensities of 4 inches p er' s hy, dof iii tion, occurfnq once every 100 years Huh the aver��,,^�re ;_ This cilcu�attioa assumes that underground drain w11'n' ?� bixilt City a per propot4d ". -' development conditions from kW proposed, ,w� eat o� the project 'on to outlets Turk Street- J rder to augne the xi.string drainage facilities. L4, tj Strsst hment: i.ciaicate p that lha X47,1_ 1 C? ri bo, CCAducied Vol' WSt,ITf.n th ptroait L i s dons (idering that the 1p4 year fk!,iv is .ail.aGrad t N;tst at back of street parRVay ulov4,0or�_,. D4rihg, thisr 1957 Cali sptaaa-rr, c+ith the month of g0i6ber :e brdizt 'he fourth aaaasviest ra$�fala of ra-p ',r, thit author iaas ,abase aecr ig71t 1 tc i.*sch; osree agati�t stt durbss bt" ,6he rk Str' t c tl Althcr3rai 3': 8_ tarot -�rilio o dav*161:e$ ar, 6 lots ` "L'c the pr*J4et,, thii total ssatatrshtd aax+t41 41f 16.6 sores at Ilett� ng can `'rusk Stfi4tt-xiil. reseairz °th$ OaM*, thsreftre, f dav�,iop°,aent of thae project isr jiiat AXp4cted to Increase flow ,tea any significant. level. - i U ' 1 1M88 Ears. 11.89 AUgdix .5uPpl*m%hta1 agalye%ss requ0st0d upon City-'-lni,tiek ,r*Vr A a' vi foregoing repdck indicates that the I,S acrt ps:ojeret ,vili contribute 8.8 cfs ztd 11. cf* is th* IqO yeir roturs`i Storm, respaative t,' ir_,',the isn4oVolopod it vdevs.ioped condit son. 2hisi difference to f?�r�rrates is t� W-hile the to t1 flcssa attributatale to the protract „ist c, 04 an isrslignifi4nt flovrats'.in, the major 3vont,” steams. j An additional street **"city -has brz%ca,i6uiated davrstrseaitt, at tare Thdrou b rod/C4mts �\ Sts. intt section to indtoits,' an ampi.T ?85 dfo caspac tj)vithi:a the strsact section far regained 1X,9 cfS fl*WretRtn frost~ a toted. vattrshod asrea s; acres, The street section: Wass built" to ixiclude a iC in4jj s;d b ,,'-ight to' turn flaws at the int *reaction and the- driue, a`��raach �. for the UCMtinq l -6t.vatsc built outside the inta"_ct#on as r mitigation meaaursesG q n s 6 t 1 t :L�i i3 y1fL a c ti JD I � , Fy LU ON." L� r may` _-,a —t �07 LLI 1 tw (� i 0 t yIH�da r ��', oe , firs INS 0 as y a Hi s t Ct +i9 et tl! ®a es t es 04 00 e �T " Rj It ; �A us f 414 •L a � ^- R eW ®k i t Aa a e� CL: aka of 3 r All CA i0 �w tit ,: �����) rnw�,5�c: c.�pu.cir�€" �o , �Ctc,Y��� •. 'fit k'a1�1�i =L4 " (� �#�',�r �Mi6��t��E '`��`�Tu�S�•�.pke,cr`+` T� �1`� �Larici�s rr��v�7��i} 171 o • I 'i Q,t?tb ti 1g17 + t'4 - 1 %1 n c 2 l5.i ".960 -2. C Q h O.! C�f 5 Alxp.. l , gove*er 10 p Planning C DACE ers of the Chaim and qQ; C }ty Plnnner Brad Buller , FRQM. pssocide plannar 13359 ycott mphy. p31D IMAM;: an acres ,� MSE5SVEW v s on u ` istr apt Hess BY: ntia 4i ast side, ENViR01 Gus �°e Very 4ort R Ida Oil •e 146'% SU63td�Y° parcels in r acre). located d —n 11in9 unit Pub of Hiii i N Ufa Sapphire Streets 6�r1 -gp i loan �ARIII� rr� k SESS�IENT ON rag �° s e iii ,a •ca in EiiVIR0 rt -' l ce $ n 39` g4are as bated read requee. feet, in. area lot au or ttil'lside a ire Street. soutt► `A �o�uactian with •' east s� 1 -691 10 and 11, APN= nductnd ,i . Coi ss propose, tract t 1957* the P anni 9 on a sis)• [lure tober j, and testimony 'S for BACjtGR0 ?1Nii; 4n �o receive input staff report �gssues relatin3 and �• I. u c erring ariaaGe (Seis ed about ues Std -t'and the and i�elat on4ern was,exP the teas ai Perk ' est Portion the'hearih9a) the driAnage f'^tlm ;,natjo,, in.the port"'" pro eCt. General Plan rk site ission continueei the the current° rovidir.9 another rpienning Co" staff to investi9 a result* este to allow potential of P arian''e requ City. �`S Of the tract end '� items., tentative these tv.o and addres+ the iiGatian,., tract APP drainage_ II. Atd� of the ienta ,)ort to address h ,the school prams u� bmitted a draina9n. &ei 3nuss the)siae of the A' street fray `�4 addressed �reeL•e can G oir lurk ofP tt►e cul-de-sac ti►e reQsrt off reasea flow . to 'Turk handle the rune licant to assess site, did ntit address with, a� cappile ail; the pipe necessary to rk been u;iable drainage however+ -the g3P . Staff has yet has VatelY ; address to Wole the flows but: as of to is r+ecessary ecntinuance be iilfbro additionaI tia ant a foutr week necessarrnereforestaff suggests issue. a study• ccn tiered. low into the City of Ontario, east to 14illike4 Avenue, and west into the City of�Upl &nd (see Exhibit f 4. The park designation of ter. general !T' ,"is a floating designation. It applie `to a general aria' and is not site r specific. I 5. Thera are otter vacant parcels is the northwest portion of th�City that could be acquired and developed for park u. 14" Exhibit " shows the lortions of existing and proposed residential subdivisions. Considering the previous pofjts, staff feels that the tentative- tract =' can be approved for the,site. Staff recommends, however, that approveY of the tract; be ccitin§int upon approval' of a Ge7�ral Plan &*ndment r having the park designation, r, f. PLANNING COMPSrt 3-TAFF REPORT - TT 13354 - Walton November 10, 1987 ( Page 2 _. B. Park Designation: One of the obJectives of the Ci'ty's,General ar. T"s o prov a adequate park and recreational fAcilities to , 'Meet the ds=nd,of the growipa_ ppulation. To accomplish this' obJective, the General Plan sates that S acres:: of park nd for every 1,000 people would be necessary. A three -tier sy9tw' , of park development was establ {shed' tai impleftnt the General Playa direi;Mll3 This, system includes ° a " — pity arks, neighborhood harks, and ;mini- parks. Comurity. parks rd e in _ _ .s size from 20-200 acres and serve k 3 mile rafts : :'bre4. ' Neighborhpod parkt, are; generally 5 -20 acres in area and serve -a 1 mile radius. Mini -parks are designed to, serve the immediate neighborhood, The General_ploaa designation for the subject site is shown as a neighborh000d pans. The City has considered the site for a park facility aa?d aieteraained the following: + 1. In reviewing the access, Surrounding and directly adJccent�- + uses, and mitigation of any adverse impacts created by the intrcduetion of a park, the City felt that the use of this � site as a park was not desirable. This decision was f �( formally reviewed "and agreed upon by the City Council's Park Acquisiti�oyel Coanaanittez With City Gounci � co acurrence .(see Exhibit "O "). ' 3. Heritage Comity Park, locatad_ to the east,- has a = = service area extending north into the sphere of influence, South to w I west into t 3, Red Hill Coawq�anity Parts, located en 8asz _ Line Road, has a service area extending,. nu th to �tjk^ City Ali ivits, south "idilyle COM!Sl( 4TAFF REPORT 7T 1�359 � �a34 YA 87 -15 ^ W:T November 10, "487 Page 3 111. , ECOMMEWTIOW Stiff, s recomseh that Tomtat vc Tract 13169 and �g �s Variance r-I 'b OntiNed to too Mating o `December 9� x987. The continfraace, however, can an?y b# acgOmplishod if the. applicant „agrees to the conttruance and the applicant agrees to waive the t1so baits Specified in tha S divisio*t gap Act. If the applicant is not' afiresable to the cantirdgnce and w:11 not waive the tiara liultsq staff" MOMMOOds that the Planning COrissiOn dit -ect staff; to peepare a Resoiration bf W. fal. TesgIly ` s ted, er v City Planner Attachmnts. Exhibit W - Residential Appiicatfons Nip �l Exhibit ;',R' y. liter fr4w gill Woll ey, Cowunity Services Director Exhibit "C" - Letter�O&tad igne 17, IjW Tentative Traci 13359 Staff Report Variance 87 -15 Staff Report e e .4* L f CITY CAF RANCHO CUCA.NJONip,� 'e, tlNl.eia {+sNyisr ` L,1Ht[7R i —++ ` -•-.�� �� SCALL r� ;DO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TMEMORMNDUK Date., Nave *b&-* 5, 1987} To., Bract' Fuller, cityr Planner From. Hill Holley, Cci 1umunity servjaas ;i:sactor Subject: Gerieral Pla u PA-krt Sire Dasignatio.-A Brad, you had inquired regarding certain pa:k site designations called out in the.. Recreation Element ",cf I u:s Gekner;;l Plan., Z� c Four park sates c �Aod out 4n a General Plan, specifically sites located at:G 0 5apPh — Of Hillside; o Banyon a� Cucamonga Criiki, o Hermosa n%rth of Hillside; and " o 'La Mancha," 8it,� west 0. *'A cv n south of Arrow, ° were 3� acTiirsd for inclusion intoll the city" paekland inventory between 1980 and 198$ when the +oppr'4urul to do so preset.ted itself. o y. In 4kch instance it was the action of X440 City Council or the city Council's Park Acquisition; Committee (witfi _,Council concurrence) that wade the dovermination .,ot to acquire the individual site. These actions will not be found in any City Minutes. The counc� s reasonin for their action at the time is ale g' irralevint today ..ti±e fact is '_-that it war their direction at ��.. the time and that direction was followed. No alternative sites have been desigrated which illustrates the need to update the Recreation Element of the "General Plait. As the Planning Division is the rcushiadianf of the General ;Plan, the Community Services Department iaoald be available and desirous 6Z-working with you,on that update. BHzbs cc: Lauren t a!LSerman, City Manager ` Dave Leonard, Park Project Coordinator. let ' CITY OF rRANC 110 CUCAM T g o wlMV Z%ia0�1�40ilf 0 •... I. � dune 17 , 19 --.i X477 � Arlan Tai n C� 5675, Sapphire Rancho Cucamonga, California 21730 r Dear Mr. W21ton: This letter is %ant confirming discussions between yoursOx ;atnd this writer regarding potential- location of` a park upon voter prop+RZ'tY G at and ad3acent to 5675 Sapphire in, Rancho CuttmongaV !' Whit the General Ptah shows an r;x}icatian of a park upon yott- E property Ihi"s M011-9 y symbolic of 1kating it in thati�"traeralw area. Upon specifid site analysis of your property when'NWdering factors of. access, surrounding and directly - a4bcent'lam usas, And, . mitigation to any ad erse impacts possibly created by the WK -Odtcq �W' of a park, it is felt that the use of your land for a neighborhood park r _= is untenabU. Wj eprveciate .our generous cociperation and offer tc help'ttua City I in this urdertaCing'of providing'more park land for Sts residents, h6* ever, are are not considering the puma --=of your props. ty ttwars that end. Again,., thank you for your consideration. zwliam :a`�ly, ey,' ire CoMaatrsity Se ices nt o , WLH:nctt ` 17 o , 1 3t.FTCAICZBT7 TT R , X( IiInt 'UCA.',tQNGA.CAI.IEC�RNIA91,3(v (71,0 WISP ;II ---- -- Crx7 OF RANCHO CUCAi ONGA GUCA1l�0 STAYFRkVOR DATE: October 28,. 1987, TO: Chairman and Members of the PTaonin�i Coarmis:�ion FROM: Brad $alter, City Planner t BY: Scott i;drphy, Assmiate Pla,..her SUPaECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSES IENt MD `iENYATIVE TVZT, 13359 - custom- o s v s on a ,acres Ot land, n o parcels in the Vern i,ow-"Idential Distrigt (less than 2 dwz:lling.units .per acre),` ocdtea on the iii` side of Sapphire StrtUt, south of x ide -Read - APN 1061- 591 - 9, 10 and la. RELATED FaLE: VARIANCE 87 -15 I. BACKGROUND: On Septee��r 9, 1987: 00 < Ue ;Planning; mission conduct e a public hearing to receive input and testi*ny'on the proposed development of 6 single family custom agts. At Oat time, with the recommended conditicn of ,approval fob a Community Trail on the satCtt Tract boundary, the lets within the subdivision would not average 22.,500 square feet. as required by the Development_ Code. The F<, -Ig Commission stiti that the requir nt of �uB a i5 =scot cofity, trail was WO';sury to implement the M er Ptan "Qf Trails within the Equestrian ,Overlay District. The Plannitrg Commission, however, felt tl;at there may be sufficient Justification tp�consideF a varia6mlo on lot size average due to the amount of Trov pts rebPired with the subdivision. As a result, the planning Co�-N% ion continued this item to allow the applicant 1 to file a variar'6'reques't. II. ANALYSIS: Following the Planning comission meet!4, the apptitant variance request to allow the reduction in the average lot size. An anaVsis of the variance is contained in the staff report for Variance 87 -15. pith Lr- recommended conditions of approval, she tots within the subdivisions ranging from 20,700 square feet to 'x„500 square fg�1et in area, conform. tz:the Development Code minimum lot size of 20,600 S(W..re feet. The average Yot size of. 21,39? square feet does not confbrm to the Code requirement of 22,500 square feet. Therefowz, the tract cam-only be approved if the related variapte I$ approv s A detailed description of t'ne various Committee recommendations is ' 4. contained in the- attached September 9th Planning Commission staffll�; f rear }, Z y PLANNING "COMiSSION #F -REPORT < TV 13359' - WW,'T0 October 28, 1987 i� III.' FXTS FOR FINDINGS: In order for tie planning Conauission to approve en ve -Tract 13359, fadt3 tev sd: port the following firdings Faust be made:. I Ve`,4 ntative tract is consistent with the feral Plan, Qe?1Flopment Code.and Specific Plans;" 2. The design or the improvements .of-the tentative it *act is \i consistent with the &dneral ;;Plan, Levelopoent Code and Specific plant; 3. ;he site it p hysically sIlitable for the "'rpe of development proposed; " 4. Tke Jesign .f the ,Obdivision is not likely to -cause sjb%ftntial env'Iorw�ntal damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife1'�rr Vitt r habitat;- - � S. the tentative tract is snot likely to c6se seri=; public health pro-bless'; &. The design of the tentative 2rsct will not conf� ct aij► easement acquired by the public ft large now crt� -, _ ord° for access -through or use of the property tjithi4 she proposed subdivision. IV. CORREvpaNQE?R�E- 'his item has been advertised -Ai The Dally Re CAA newspape otivPs were sent to all propeNtyfownei�s wittii�r "30if ° feet of the._pt�ject site. V. RECOi s.ENDATION., Staff recommends that the Planning ,,Cowissioyt conduct a pu"i'ia .hearing to receive all inpAt and teax'imgay do the proposed pro,�ect< If, after receiving input,i the Manning Cowoission dotemines that there is suff,:.iont jCstificaflon for t the variances, 'then approval of Tentative Try '` 13359 through adoption of iM c attached Resolution and issuance of i Negative \-' ' Declaration w6►11d 4A cppropri ate. Re ^ ^ >p Vful ly s fitted, r' ra e City planner :SM* tachaients: i. er g, 1987 Plannin Commissipn g.Wf Report blution off -Approval ,A h Ccnditi -bns- r-- STAFF REPORT DATE: l Qct�tCipr 28, 3557 ' PJ T0; Chairman and Members of the Plan 0)19 Comission FROM: Brad Busier, City Planner, 4 BY. Scott lRrph 1Associate P7anii r� � Si SUBaECT: ' ENVIRO NTAL ASSESSSMEM7 AND VA1Z60GE V-15 - 11ALTON - A requss o Teduce m n- average iot s f2e from 22,500 square feet 7 -+n .area to-21,392 square feet in area �n t'conjunct4o" with 4 six { sot subd ivision located on the east side of Sapphire,'/Streat, sQLt of Hillside Rod APH: 1061- 65110 and 11. REE.ATEtI FILE: Ten {alive Tract 13355. { I. BACKGROUND: On September 9, 1997, Plannfng Commission conducted a pu C ►eating to receive input and testimony, -sn' a proposed ` development nf, six single family' custom, sots. At that tip, a condition of approval'required that a Community .?Trail bo provided along the south tract bounddary. With. this additional; dedication, the subdivision court no longer meet the sari -ismm average. tot size *equired by thf Developmeot,;Code. the Plamtyng Coamissioq stated '.bat the requf0ement of a 15' Community ,rail was necessary to lmpl.ement the Master Flan of Trails within the Equestrian Overlay District. The Planning Commission, however, felt that there may be sufficient justification to con si r a variance request 4ue'to the amount of impro:l nts required with the subdivision, f° Ii. ANALYsis• The applicant is requesting a`variance� to allow a, reMct3Un in the :minimum average lot size from 221,500 square feefi in area to 211,352 square feet in area, In consiiering th varian-e request, the Planning Commission day wi-sh to consider the following items: 1. The unusual configuration "'of the site greatly restricts, the design of the subdivision. The Site is a flag lot design ` with a 401 w;de strip of lard fronting onto Sapphire Street. :`As a result, access -to sit` is limited to a single street emtering the project and cul- de- sacing within the larger portion of the`` rl site to the southwest. 2. The ;proposed lot sizes are 'consistent with' the surrounding area. The :race to the south and to the west' across Sapohire. Street were developed at the B -1 20,000 zoning designation, of the County. As a result, the lot sizes within those tracts are approximately. 20,000 square feet.... The current proposal McLts - or exceeds the lot sizes of the surrounding developments. �� s L �c 10 _ PLMNING COMMISSIC TAi F REKRT VARIANCE 57-15.R WALTON October 28, I5$1 Page III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In Order for the planning C0*1ision to approve o var ace, the pevel ent Code requires that the following findings must be met; 1. That th, strict dpd literal interpretation and enforcement of the &peOfied re ation would result in practical difficulty { Or onnntessary physical hardship i�7)onsistent with the objectives of the Bevelb*"t Code. 2. That 'there are � exc tan eptional or extraordinary irzrasstances or conditions applicable to the property inv�q,d or to the intended use of the ((pNo arty that do not generally apply to other oroperties in t&ce ame district. a. That strict or literal rote r,� rA Cation of .enforcement of the specified regulatior woulc# deprive the applicant of privileges eVoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. 4. That granted a variance Would not constitute a grant of special rivilege inconsistent with the 71mita-m6rig of other properties ,Mfied in this Same district. , 5. That the granting;,of a�-variance will not be -detrimental to the health, - safety, or 'welfare, or materially injurioxj to properties or improvements in the vicinity, IY. !-wnon- RRESP B lENCZ: T{�is item has been advertised as a public hearing re siTj- R- ` Ort rs spapger and, notir;es were;ent td all :property ers _w rn a of the prOlgct site. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff Kecommends that the planning Commission con u�f"c_ a 'puMc hearing: to consider^ Input and elements of this project. .If, after Such consideration, the PlannfAg Commission can support the - required "P4in''gs, then adoption of the attached R. esolutiOn Of Approval wodid be appropriate. Resp ally su ted, rad 1 - City PI ner BB:SM:vc Attachments: Exhibit "A* -.Site qt11izati6 AOL ' ! Exhibit V - TractJ Map n Resolu licn sof App oval r'J d CI'T'Y CF ;I • Y1 Z I-N _ - ( t cl ff ITE.ti: A,1.� =�5 A LTC .\'Q.,' A TITU. ` I\p"),DIVISION , E%HIPAT- � SCALL. w CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STA REPORT, 577 i , DATE: Septemb 91 1987 s, fQ chairman IA*ers of the Pr%nnirtg Ccamissiarj FROM: grad B III1 'City Planner BY- Scott mdiph t Assooiate,planner ` SitBFIEET: ENV R0i9 111'AL ASSESSMW AND TE WALI AIVE T I3359 is n a acres o ain 1"n o X, (6Y pa 0x in the .Vary Lost Residential District (less titan d=�►ellia9 "units per acre), located on fine east side of Sapphire St�eti:,Mth of Hillside Road APR o an I E. I. PRWECT MD SITE DESCRIFI`UWt A. Rctirn Red: Approval of suO iftslon design, concert ual Bra 41nq plan, 4`n4 issUance of a Negative Declaration. R. Prn3eat AnEsitr 1,.58 dwelling units per acre l C. Shrroundi--n--!L(;and Use and Zoning: orM - Vacant, w esiTent #all fuss than 2 dwelling units per acre) South - Single Family Residential,: Very Lave RC4identiaU (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) East - Floyd Stork EiMntary School; Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) Weser' - Single - 'Family Residential, Very, LvResidential (le w, than 2 dwelling snits per acre? 0. General plan Designations. ecz North - Very tow Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per arse) South - Very Low /Residential (less than 2 dwel >ing units per acre) r East - Elementary School West - Ve0 Lour Residential (less than 2 duelling' units per dG E. Site C aract stics: The site is currenj�.\y vacant with are average s op o G percent from northwest to southeast..' - -,-� �J PLANNING COWISSI ' XAPF REPORT TENTA'i'IVC TRACT M0 -. WALTOx September 19A7 page 2 - f 0 II. ANALYSIS• A, General: The a cant is ranging in size from 20, 700 square fget to 2 "4 0 square feet in area. The lots are intended to be sold for custom home development: !, B. Don Me v ,tLer; Me Design Review Committee (Barker; MUM, "liuiTe° revised' title Proposal on November :`6, 1985. At tt2t time, thq Committee recommen4ed approval of the project subject to the following conditfans: 1. -r o driveways (curb oq ) on Lots 3 and 4 should a be .limited o 12 feet t� width, 2. Tine driveway ~on - Lot 3 should be located on the east side of the property frontages 3. The driveway on Lot 4'shouldcbe located on the Crest side of the property frontage. C. Technica? Review Committee: 'The Technicai Review. Committee rev- ewe c propose o ti ovtmber 4,, 1985. - The Committee determined that the dr X49* of the public street woul4,have to be handled with in.a storm drain pipe, as opposed to amt at -grcde structure as proposed by the applicant, n order to protect the residences, to the South of the` - sitar; a result; an easement for the proposed sfarm drain pipe and any grading necessary for . corkstructlon' of the storm drain pipe was required across from the' \elementary school site. IWO applicant has subsegrttently obtained the necessary easement from the sci* ;°`i district. the final design of the storms drain pipe wil` be- reviewed and Y; approved by the City Engineer -prior to reco- rdatia(i of the final map. �� R D. Trails Advise Committee- The Trails Advisory Committee I reviewed I ie'"proposia ore y 20, 19$7 and recommended approval` subject to the foilowingrrequirements; 1. Provide a_,16 -feat wide communii� trail with offered- dedication along fine southern tract boundary:. The community trail fencing should be provided along the northgrn edge, of the trail, The Trails Committee stittd that'the dedication 0 was necessary tit order to pr vide another portion of the Eeechwood tommunity bail as required by., 1_ \r the Master,.Plan of Trails,,(see Exhibit "b"}, The ' feet trail South of the tract is twonty (20) fast '0 wfath but is, however, an equestrian easement ,and ft not dedicated to the City. MA HM C" Ml ,TAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 13369 - WALTOt!` September S, 1967 i Page 3 ; 2. The 15 -foot aide local trail easement 41ong the west tract boundary xho d ;extend up � Street A. 3. The local feeder tram shown along the' southwesterly lot line `of Lot 2 should be - :deeleted', 4. Alt offers of daI.Vw tion and equestrian easements 0 are to be shown o the final asap and artk to- be sul*ftted fo? the v%view and approval of . hi" Trails com�ittee prior, to recordation of the h final map. With the incorporation e, the recoil ndations_ of the Tr*iTs Committee, the tiract design„ as prcrpoked by the applicant; iuill not be in conformance with lire., velopment Code, The Development Code requires that the to v-fthin the subdivi PLAWNG COMiSSI ,TAOF REPORT; M(TATIVE T;) 13359 , SAptamber 9 ..47 r� J � n " V. RECD ATIN: 4Uff roc s that the FIanning commission 5� cans r a Public testimony an.the proposed development. If, after receiving all input, the Pla6ing CoWision ^oncurs With the recUNWandations of the dvisory committees and the applicant is un 1IIng to revise the =dIvislon map, s4ff recommends that the Planning Commission deny Tentative. Trlct 13369 We the Inconsistencies with the Development Cade,) adoption' of the hed Resolution, _ Respectful subaitte &, (( ra City banner BB:S4:te - Attachments: Exhibit "A" » Site*ilizatipn map Exhibit `B" Subdvisi Map ExhibCt "C" ,;w Ccnciptua rading Plan Exhibit 16' - Wster PlDof Trails u ,� ResdwtiO of Denial _ hr - U 7 l VACIM c' Vol ,!r• t'>� rt �TiEs;pt� � 7' � � © VLF � O �1 I 'i1f CITY CC-ill" A:�r`W+`4 I Al iiTM 'YTITLE- on E ItBiT St I j i Jt` [ `* �rI C._ #_ � E r F--fLi 17'llFli�" S 'C UC r ;NC D$ \'k.3v °fitEii` r { � } 3 jr --��- a ]` v a � QTY OF l PLANNI DW5M XHINT. 1' EXISTING C 7� a .REGMAL. ire -SYM ALMQW f 8iLLSIDt =rte - �•�FrF S•�f•'n'� + -`' "jr . -��. Li�si:1�j •' b ' Y 4; 0 11 o I f i� �•� j1t {• y k � i� � �yi (1 - SANY® Is ax �, TH frrLE , RESYhaiTliRi 1f0. a A RESO UTION OF THE PLANNI;I C"ISSIOpr OF TfiF CITY 'JF1 f A HO CUCANIONG'1 APPR,rYI M T PfT'ATIVE TRdki3 MAP N0. 13359, LOCI ON THE 'EAST HSIDE Shea E�TL�7. O RrC S� A RESIDENTIAL SU GIYISE�NI6F SINGLE FA6MILY LOTS ON 79 , ACRt� OF' LAND a SOUTH OF HILLUDE ROAD APR: DOE • b9I -O9, 10 =iat�� 91 ' A. �Aecitals. 4th. iAan Wilton leas "#feed PpCrcawian for the approval of rentativ:; Tract Map NC. 13359 as de�ceibn'd in the tit%; of this Resolution. Hereinafter' in this, Resolution-, .the Tentattift Tract yap, raspiest is ,. referred,tf as "the app ? icateon " = ti - fis} On the 27th a anuary.,198% th�,,P] rninq G,aaissiflt of tine City of Sahchb Cucamonga "conducted a duly„ t4ce _;p�ui�tto hearing on the applicatiui� and cvncluded said hearing ,on V*t da,e. . till All legal prerequisites to t adaRtian. 4f this Resalutiort hav- occurred. ) f << B. Resolution. _ NON, ` KREFORE, itQ!Ts 'hereby found, � )termined and resolved by the ng Co ::s�iors f the ®!ty of Rakho OucaaW ga as folIowsi Pl arni II I. This CQMissian ilerft specifically -fic", thaft all \of, -t;�� facts seg forth in the Recital st Pat-ti.4" of this Risolutic, -true- i d correct. 2. Based t ;t on s' �stawiia#, 'C04 e presentgd to thi - Ci ission during `he above- ref`?rence�' public hearing on January 27,11988, including, twrittan and crab staff reports, ;together with„ public testimony, this Commission heietiy specifically finds as foilars; (a) The application applies to property` located on the. east side of Sapphire Street, smith of H)lls3de Road with a street.,frontags of feet and lot depth,'of 565 feet and f4resently vacant z Ana ,b) The - peo t sou to the north, th,`aast and �st�is �onedi � For residential uses. The p opeety to the rf%rtth is po'esently vAcaelt. The property to the South and west is developed lint.'.; Single family residences. The, property to tilre east is developed otfth an el(mentar),schoul; arias (c) - 7he- proposal is in '1, anc�'risit}r :e' Oster Plan of-,_ T.lails and V0 objectives of the Equessri _derlay- Cistrict; ; d} The developmt�nt of'6 �vzgle faally.iot�,pn 3� g adrps�� laiRd i5 consistent with the Very LOW R iddepti� land ,4se designation ,af Xhe General Plan. :, y PLANNING CDW4SSION R8Si3LUTIOR NO t z TT .13=i, ;� iat ton , January 27, 1985 Page S. S2siid upon'the substantial twidehce presented to this 'Gt ission during fine' above- referenced public hearinj, and upon; the�' s t'fic finding, of facts set Farah in paragraph 1 b1!md Z above, this Co, iss3 n liereby finds and concludes as follows: ., r. (a) that tentative tract.. is consist pt with the, - General Olar, Development 40, and sp?c;fic 'Olant� and M The design or improvements of the tentr;tivz - -` tract is consistent with the f, nerai ,.,P' -an, Development Code, and specific plans and L ' (ri rite site is ph sficalTy su1U -i le for they t;�� i ,of- J deve,lo • , nt "ro " ed;, an,ct 5dv " he design of "the so division i�s iron 'likikly to cause substantizi environmental ',Votaagn and avoiatble injury to humans and thldlli'e ,or their rtablta't;;;and r (e) The ;", twctative tract" is not likely to \cause ser fta� s: public Iteolift 000m; and / tf9 tract wi The doign . .)f tw,�j �t nat k confl rct :with eent accuird by the � public at Ta age; now of record, for adce -ks i tbrt -r *.nor use of tM property Wtvin %e pro 64d Subdivision, t 4. This Wzxt�tiss'Oil he by finds "and c t�fies tha4 }he prisdect has baen oeviewed and considered in camel ante ¢�`� tf"� l'�Tii4.rr�;a Er�visorar ntal Quality Act -,if 1870 �;nd, further,_ this 1-,`beret- Issues "a N iae Declpration. S. As4,!'4on thjt findings arl, O�inclusio6s; set ftrM 3n paragraph 2, 2 and 3 a6bie,thiso Co mission here` Lpproves the tppl- illation subject to each and every cendit ;on set- 'forth below any 1 tfth attakhed. $tanda'rd ] . P y reference. Conditions atta0ed h' 4to and incor^ orated l5ure$,i b tatfi5 ' Plannin� t3fivfision �• ,` - ��' ., (1) Apprgv,T of Ter,tat:'.e it «ct �i369_� ..grunt d "aJef +o apprpva�l of Variapce 87-16., limited tt`2,fee (j, Jriv€wdys oil lot -, ,- � Thgrevfsedvlanif.� o and ap�rgved lfy;�the ' r City anneh prior to_,t?tr: ass �tng permits. - x 3 � driveway 04 ltK 1 shall be I oc&�' A on the east side rjv th e lot and the dr vertay a 1 o +t shall` located dr€ the west ide of the Tilt.. ``he iv vised puns shall dud " eviewnd i`3d ,epprovo by tK� Ity Pl nnAr� r�niror taj the tssuancr ,4 building nermit3. 0 MlSkOft RE UTIQ No. T-T 1330 - Wilton J�, livary"27�, Ve 'ead Utilities. a. Sa rtst: kA In-lieu f 914; ar t4#3MOP64ing �!)f the ex6stf4 -overhead utfIfties. o . .2re Contribution to, the TUIure And electrical )- on, -the projept-'sidi tf "Sijphire Street $pall "be paid to the tity p recordation, of the finaT map.- The, fee X1 I Llohelhalf rojLc adopted unjit wunt time$,-*, p t Pronta on Sep'�hire.,,�Preet. b utfll�i_lfnet CeTd,ctrical ) extending f"�-�Opphfre $Uleet eastorl 1-Y along ttha'prnposed street "9 sh-all be . um- im 0� eemov 't . __,ou f not, in service.-froo Sspph,�,j*e �Utreet zo, the with,0: 1. If undergrounding is it k,-s'emer ty/ the �Orth is nece mbu or,_'one-half,-,"e City adopted cost Is Mble, OeOUSe the proper uhdevel pa �gAe�4el el� shiii consti�U4' t!�e "A: Street' iniprovements jj ozng- h -'of tne "Not Ajt",�Parctl to the satisfaction of age a City Engirser. _1W 3) An undergrour�.�;�- be constructed appropriate eijEqj�,Jks 4� tatratea 40nvey fl ows from the sout) end of S�r�et "A� t6-'\,!,,Ak Stmet tf -t -4—Af Itte Cf. t)� Engineer. , "th4L Ize O� the catj dm Ige are, to be dOerlmined--�-by.,tfie fjjj�f draug,� stgdy. 4) Me I (,t li", _AA�-4stment as shown., ac map 04,�:the tentatlye- tr t shall to recordatlon of _tke-�'hm�, 'tract ecor.dad prior 'Map. �5) A detailed stu4y� ts evai Uate thi " ffecte tit�- oUtjr the drainage atted ,'OFitO TLArk -Street, shall '�,be cm�pl'Aeu#" .,--prioi# to -dation of t1le yinal Map. upon. the res4jft 60 redo, the Stu(b, the developer shal'i c0n%',"fuCt Oainagg pr6tecti6h V facilities, as required by the'VtY - -,Znjfni4r__, which maY. inclede- - Ce instailation ' e-� 4 sitorii 'Pipe exter<�'-,pq "tfrom the proposed Outl at onto�' Turk � oii�eet to Demers Chahnel e Sotttft. The -ztudY,,' Stiall, Im-parti cular, investigate in tail t�e oeffect§ _on' OOW due to -the i"egular shapj� of 'the"TLrk,, StN,qt- GUT�40-sac bulb, and :Oe ,conf 'I i lu6nr pe of flows at Me -ec��,Ions of C ameo Strett, with ThorqugKYed S�,reet and T r Deputy Se 6. ar,,�tary, f"'; this �,Comissiqv'smll certify to t ie adoption of tNfi��;ol U, ti on". 0 "o S1 ob P PtICNING 04 IBSIi�iij:ES� UTICR No. IT 11359 - W*nof� U � u January "c7,° 19188 -{ 9 Pd � a - - A'S �3 �n�s ur aonnttoo� " 'r t �1,. , ';u�PP (1VE0 f Iu.�LiP,,'gU tQ�ZS 21li -,� � j " y, u v 1 pr �INQ tow aSlf� Or-, HE CI*u 0 CUC4vw a i.8_,� a '� 8. �►� 1 , AT u au �,, I, Brad Buller, p, q,OY Sts etary bf the Plaft y1RO C tFffi1a0 0 the qty vf, f Rha Cca�an l 4reby OriifY 'tW, ire f6reyraino Roselution wes duly and:, 1 re9tlarly lrttr duced,�,,passed ;� and- a6uOted by tine imirr4 cowsi 0o of the" Citybf Rancho, CucamaO,,; .-at ate, regular meeting of � planting CNWOiW'.sion held on the 27th ' of jant{a���� 1�l1t3, by �the�; fol'i+s ng, vofe o,�wit* cowlSSiflhE#1 s '� { NOES: CQMIS$IOkES: iv , AMSENT. , vAv r ti3 3 � 10 fO RE'�LUTION No. A MSOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCA14ORGA PLA48INS COMMISSION {{ APPROVNG VARIANCE No, 87 -15 To ALLOW A REDUCTION OFJHE I MINIMUM AVERAGE LOT SIZ FROM 22,SOG 'ARE FEET TO ` I 21,392 SQUARE FEET, IM AR FOR A RESIDENTIAL SU)SDIVISION i OF 6 LOTS IN THE VERY LOW ,RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT LOCATED ON ' f, r14E EAST SIDE OF SAPPHIRE STREET,= SOUM OF HILLSIDE ROAD - AFN: 1061- 6911,40 and 11. A. Recitals. 11 (i) Arlan Walton``has �filedz a� application for the issuance of the Variance No. 87 -I5 as described in the title of this Resolutions Hereinafter- In this Resolution, the subject Var4nce request is referred to o "the application ". (ii) On ,lanrary 'r, =1988, the Plan ni ng Commisstan of thr Ci ty of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a *ety noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on th t�date, (iii) All 'legal prerequisites to the adoption: of this Resolution have occurred, B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, at is herebyv4fWnd, determined and resolved by., the " Planning Commission of the City of Ratrcho Cucamohg� a foll"s: i. This C,__�ssion hereby specifically finds that all ojr(the facts set forth in the Recita'o. Part A, of this Resolution are true and prrect. 2. Based upon substantial .evidence presented to this Ummission cuing the above-referenced public tearing on January 27, 19 88, Including written and oral staff reports, to ether with public testimony, this Coamss;on hereby specifically. finds as follows: (a) The application a liar side of Sapphire Street south of Hii(lside Roa property streettfrontageeof '40 fe es. and lot dapfiM of 665 :met and js,�presently 4acant, (b) The property, to the north, south east and w€`st is zoned for residential uses. The property to the north is presently .rracant, She . property to the south and %*st is developed with sirrgle ilcmily residences. The property to the east-is ills-°yeloped with art f^gmerrtary school; to) The a plicatiun is designed to facilitate the'�ivj_,on-oi 3.79 acres into ..six (6. residential parcels and has been submitted in conjunction with "a request for the, approval of Tentative Tract Map to. 13359, Such an acti9n as cor3templated, in conjunction with the fpplica<ti4n, conforms -to the General- Plan of the City of rancho Cucamonga aW is a permitted use within'`the Very Low ResidertiaZ District; . Ice PLA MING Cq*ISSION RES&Ul'IDK;Nb. VA 8i -1s - htal ton � ,. ,: _ -, • January 27 1988`' Page - L . L . (dl �4he � 0ftation has been subWttedP�1_43low I reduction In the minimum average lot;, size within said Ttnta;ive Tract Mao Nc `1133599 eontraq to the rexAirewlents of Section 1748.G4D? of the Mitt of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code requiring tracts thin fOr,Y Low Residenti &l District"# have a milli a m average lot of U,600 s4uare fey;; and (e) The variance as specified in the i0lication will, not �. contradict the goals or abJectives of -the Rancho Cuca gm General Plan 010 Development Code ark W17, not promote=d detrimental condition to the'--persons, .. V rollewserty in tyre immediate, vicinity of t� "subject site for the reasznI as f \�c,;�The , u6u4ual configuration ".of the` iite. greatly restricts the ability'o ; develop the site in a manner cons''t t with.; the miaftis average lot sfze ,fNmquir*ent,af tip;' Development {rode, - TgLc site has only 40 feet of street pnUge on Sapphire which requires extenjji ,e street improvements on ioe- tracti�nterior, : (2) Several tracts `04centto'kfre "Sfl"Ject Sgto,have,bftn.- appropriately ;Cn.velopec utilizing dots which 6u not Veit the exis?,1119 minlmkl +� average lot s' ie standard, "thd (31 The Master Mars of Trails reflects that, ari eastfa�st cwmnity trail ,shall be P.�ovided� c�tnc Frently �uith the develdpment of ihE subject site. Decease of �1 exlstirg 46- fiyurata � CA the site, 'said trail., is . Mequired, to be dsdickte� along thj ` trut lour: Ary, tws, fzsrthe'r reducing the area to all y c �liance With miAlfiw m avarage lot site gtandards. '1- `> 6a3ed upon the so- 5�,Urtt evi �ienoe pritented to this `�ommisa jan during aveW referenced pobli h � 4 and upon the speotfic findings of facts $v t�fisrth in paragraph 1 ana. ve, this ,%oaanti sign hereb y f i sis and conclw -� s as follows: ;i (al That strict or literal l,terpretlatian and Warcement of the spe6fied reoiAation would .ult in practical difficulty ow, utnndcessary ppsical hards�aip incansist nt with the bb eotive ��f the Development Code. (b) h5at there are exc- ptional or extrdordi3ary' � U c$,rcumetarces or, conditions apisl ice applicable ' to ,the �< 4_ pr�'yerty involved 0. to the intended "use of `thy pr¢ arty ,l at do oot apply, generally. to other proptr�ties n the same district, (cl fhat stri';iteraE inb,,,rp ( {ration'�-i: enfar�e►,�ent of the specified rNlulatian1 ul�i ? deprive th applicant/ of privilegris,knjriyed�i e �� d owners of he perties in the, saw :district. .� 0,CANNIh& towissiam 01 11A R7 -15 - Walton _ Pale 3 7 T - -a " M That the granU4iq= of ` the ',Y �! �� e will not constitute a gram uf`speeii pri�iege incoissst$nt `; With,, the l tmitati rns on OtWr pperi~ es'cla441 ad in the same irktrict. <, , k (e), That granting of ,Yarianc# .aril detriOntal #.c ttwr publfq` Imalth, ,safaty, or ly s - Wzl f4 e, or. mater$al , iojuriolis -to peoperties, or -: ti> proywontS, in t1 a �tttr itw. , 'v:- S(�t[ upot the findings> t +5 luei'cns set forthc4:i paragv'a b •. c 1, 2 and oVe, this ,ioMisSipn hereby appMed the application suhjeot each and e(,1y condition set forth"below," c,> - t Al'lt � ppi ik:4h!e cond�tionS do itai ad in '' the . Y.- SOl �siera ay Approval for Tentative Tract US% s„ Ali applJ: `tk� SN The Depute Secret4 ly to this Comipion'�hatl cartif to time odoption of Ois Resesu'V o. AVRQBED:AND ADOPTED THIS Z7THQZAY4 dAMUiil $ 19 80. PLANNING COPId ON OF THE C:m, 6F RANC.kiL COCAMNGA arry T. McKleT, Mairman MBEST• .. - —' Orad 13 u ; er,p!i i+ re arX I, Brad Sulier, DepatY• Secretary of the Planting ommission of the Cifi of J Rancho GuOiohga,.,do 40rehy' certify that the -roregoing Resolution was dilly and regulavit introduced, pa &se(a� and adopted .bY the Punning Comission of the c, City of Rath& Ucamlonga, at _v 5ular edit of thi Pl'a�mmng Co*ission,Wd on fire �70' !day -of Janu�i,) IgB6„'by the f-jilu�rinq��te «ta•i�ax. AYES: NOES: C4P3ISSItRSs ; ti ABSENT. 1 s 2LIA -Z kh, I M�a K� 3$ le I [lit is is age HK AlitE mss « dc.n 1)ir #, 14 • wS 2 v -.7 A 7 F.3s1 Mvf %W- c y Y N Y ,w Y y �. St. t gm �Jpzg t Mi J) K t. liter „v f 2LIA -Z kh, I M�a K� 3$ le I [lit is is age HK AlitE mss « dc.n 1)ir #, 14 • wS 2 v -.7 A 7 F.3s1 Mvf %W- c y Y N Y ,w Y y �. St. t gm �Jpzg t Mi J) K t. 11 p Erik 9 WWI NZI 0:11 q a`d' s r`Y lee �= I +H M N M 6 $ PSI as, „y'�! i Y'� �y n LA In f Le Y i X gi ws is 45 ^p " q }4 W ♦E }. � jI v44. 6 ( 71► 'r �- q I. M N J `J_ �¢'$1$..� ^w i� py Zj� �► �r. ti t+ >� � �F�y ypp�yR4y1C i .i w.' 1A1. YY GGG.,. e•- iL��ylj �� yJy�,�yy /� #ry.yy,`.,��,,��_Y6 YiT iQq `,.�.. �" MC,.•, � N < Y .J •i V A Y4 �' « N rF� 2a" V b A 'a CISS - - T f I S, 34.1 Ise ME Nz l'-110 =3� -,� JJ p. e ;ail .2 � i - - 72 4. Q: 4. 2 Vitt RS 11, 34 fill E1,15:13—ki- jigs =Iizq f Ad :5 as La 17 -a a-tx 424 . an I. be 6M r0i a- -C -C . a V Ispe r. v Is,' 4, Sf C. C -, -1 L PAR mn InV3 M� 2- R, k !SS z,:1, v -A' A 108 t a- 'P, 1. 11 , i . HIS .3 JIII z- 0!", a E il-i a, a I I.- i ;, 'A . - . H-t Em 24 JJ G^ ONN v IE ° wN �Y. NY a(�-Y$ swj}� sue. g$ af„4> l �ggi N..4 ' 3 r� 'SIR V Vim` Sam yY_ ` O6 i ry Wit +�6p itOf MIA— di- X34 zzt of . O• A.-As 66y�p , PS nY4 + 1b. ` � y Yn He M ■p,�. per. � � HgQ R� : • k. Ii. 4Y „ L Vwlt L 1 tee, +yA� ii4� �,.WL Yy 4A� may+ «t ,•Y. - �t�.��.+ v- I� s+ f. zz ! y; karts tt12 iz is +�s g 7 pTj 6� ft.. Tae I' Or M � L. M p �M ;'+ _ cp y� w' Pg t$i ou Is ,_,�.�• ( \SRS } "at Pull I a+l tl$u IS 5: Nvaa N41 W y YM .may I a Ai it M E a c°� e �� ws s N a YwTS M!Y LN N �� C V i3j Ss _ a ° - s' tt Nr� Y N - r. q gl �lJ {� �3 t � A he _ MC its Arw U-�-' la 4f x r� sM y.Ki �QayLy YY Y p P ♦ � A. aw y iJN WVS IS. olit !C Y • v 13 '+v VOW' R its I Si T YM M Al. fit "A TRT WAS a M ilh� MY S 7 t" ;' g _��R�� _ 1 �.ye. 4.w.. SIX 1 Jc� rx� t {1i pow cmilty LU � _ O - , Q OU x sib I r Hil y �yptY �eLZy}i d�1 ii. �`/ n1 "as W re + d hw. +,fir ".•� �� � y sue++ • � � M � � �� '� � � tai. Sr alp Sit qj Aw Ti- �.�ie tit ++c ww i 0 r n , Lt i O , sn� ' `� 'mot 'r 'v` - ^� �. L ��• ed' .,, � t � +e �, 0701- a`- zcAgenda of 0 ,-- �-- - CiTY OF RA NCH@ CUCAMUN'GA y STAFF REPORT, E Z DAiEa January 27, 1988 E.) a W7 TO: Chairman and Mcrbers of the Planning Commission FROM: Ban Colarsra:l, Senior Planner BY: Muncy Fk, Associate Planner Sii &IECT: ENVIRONMENTAL. ASSENT AND, CONDITIONAL USE PEM41T 87-26 - aen er ncisrciin the ve upmen o an Integrated opp ng g preservation of the oxisting Thomas Winery building, totaling 11,000 square feet on 10.4I sacra; of land in a 5pocialty Commemial District, to atad at the northeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and: aathill Boulevard .� r APN: 208- 101 -10, 11. r The Design Review Committee on January 21, 19818 reviewed the iFn �sd elevations for Buildings F, 6, and A, as well ` as the elements and detW^ings for the project. The Committee r^ecoW.*nded p _approval with co�ditiens and stated that these aonditicrrs' �� ;.a�s� °se _ added to the proposed Resolution of Approval for Commission 27, 1988.' These conditions are asfollows. 1. 76 proposed additional architectur�-._11 elements and wl11 tn5". are acceptable with madifications as follows. A. only `metal b"`ckets °si,ould be used without the galvanized metal plate. The metal bracket should, be painted to match the wood star.; B. The half circle gutter should be painW to match the -building color. € C. Sample of the mvllion should be provi',ded for' Commission � review at the meeting. D. Additional variation to the store front design, such as pop -outs, shot ;ld be provided and to be subject Commit:,Ws review and ,approval. .� n. N 1Y 2. The corner reatment for Building a is ac sptaile. 81 'lie entryway treatment, including., the te��Kka pg,of thq,east elavation ,of Building F.,, is ac�ephble. Ni. ASSESS & rro SZ =Rfr„ � �ianuary 27,'.� page 2 <. n 4#; ire *est and South elavat`� of Bui7 ng A tSoupTantatioartL ", are atceptabie, ' fi ver, � ` building c6lor, latarfats and l ' sigVs shWld Witch the entire center and the fature 3i�e prograw Also, SAW12s of,th,p� �ion''eolor and the to'iar chap for W1 ding_ , s�houyl bs .provided for Co mission mview,at't�o �x�eting. Attacl`ed for your r&vit- is 4�e new Rssolutio6 4i 'Appr` -)Val with these conditions added to it. R pectfu sub�p d. k " Q C44� °1 Seni'br i c: I t- a PLANNING COWISS10k RPE$OLUTIO0�i, lei, COfEf}ITIONAL USE PERMIT, 61 -26 - OAs January 1983 ,� Pages (20) The site shall be develo d „ and r" aainta ned in �+ accordance with the approY S ,l, g n nc odes architectural:` elevations, ex and colors, lOdsc4049, sign programs, and grading an file with tote planning Division, the capditions contained therain and Code regulatfons. (2) Metal `rackets shall be used for the arbor rrork on;y, r, ' witi+out LhA galvaf4ized rr;etal p7,ate. - The matal bracket �� shall be painted to Witch the 'wood stairs' color. 5armsl a shou3 d ba subaritted to the City planner for 'approval reviawr and prior to _issuance of buildig permits. � f (22) The half cirrctb gutter shall be painted to match the ;, building color* i23 Yariation to store front design, such as "popped out" recessr,in, ,riverrock- base, the base, etc. shat'+ be provided, and to be subject to the Design Review Committee reviews and approval prior to, plan `crack. (24) &;ilding A (Souplantati6n Rest$ufant) shall \Ie the `` Same exterior building „color and "terial as tha entire shopping center. foil Witerial sa ies 'shall be submitted for City Manner review and,approval prior to issuance of building.peraits (2S) The sign progr for the shopping center, including the major tgnsints for Building D and A, shall - be ' designed to be compatible with the architectu,a? styte, Variation of sign solar shall be minimal. The size of the _sign copy shall be visually balanced and Proportionate to the building and the architecture 4251 The temporary relocation and the final location of the directional ss�igns For the historical Landmark of the �\ ;�. Rains 6fouse shall subject to Historic preservation`" t Coamrissiart4 /review and Approval prior to plan check. The rewv'l of the existing wnument sign shall be subject to Hi,.Oric preservrtion Ommission review and approval prier to issuance of building peraaits. Enginderin2 Division ✓` c f v 11 ?.'Overhead iltilit;ies r a. Vpeyard Avenue - The existing oVftead utilities T e:mmun ca on and electrical, except .,for 65 ; P l,�iPlING CtlF�IiSSI4N RarStiLCiiICN Nt3. 77 CONDITIONAL DISC PEPJ41T 67 =26 January 27, 1988 f�tge fi Kv electrical) on the prafect',',�fte of'Vineyard Avenue sh#jl be undargrounded ielioN the first pole on' the n0r�4 side of San Bernardino Road to the ,;pli,rtt polo on Otte south $1 _oyi foothill ,ti AV�ile a}°d9 prfor''•' Y o publ to 4mprov n4. _ acceptance or occupancy, whinktver ;ours first-;, The developer may feNest a, reimbursement agreement tai recover One -half tEt`.a C✓ �y adopted cost for undargrounded' fr Future �:Lyelop nt tr�sdetoprMenl as it occuron the opposite side Of the street. b. San ROM_y rdino Road - ' `i in -lieu .fee s con r�tbu on € t rutur'e undelirouna#ng of the existing overhead utilities ttelecomnications On the ng rosite "s3,de of San Bt„mardino Road shall be paid t4 the Ciiy prior to issuancs o building fee permits: Tire s a1P be One -half, the city adopted unit ufit � %es. the_ length from the cefitef of Yineyax',f anue to the east project boundary. f (2) Upgrade, modifications, and relbi�,Ation$, as necessary, l Of the traffic signa_f dttke interjections of. Foothill Boulevard a��,Yineyard" Aveaue, an Sa�s`8ernardt�to Road .and Yineyai^zd Avenues shall be. c responsibf` #ity raf 'the f1� thee- developer. 1'Clacatfon�aEnd �adi:fi;.atiar 5���}l.r . be, to the sa�isfactioaa of the City E`nr�i?reer. ,, . „ �, t2a Additional right =af -ray for right turn Tanes.. nn-�. ;° FOOt�rfll Boulevard and San Bernardino Road shkl be dedicat'Rd at ultirtiate street widths as shotm 13 the ,;. - apprr�,veo striping plan. �` (4) tiff site street tmproveeenf% necessary fir ;trsffiC 1: safety OR the west side Q- ,..Vineyard Avenue shall :be constructed to the satisfactian of the CVV Engineer. ' (5) An encroachment permit is' requirQ�ffor the arbor which , extends; into the gamic :treat right -of vay sin` iirteyard Avenue« 187 she full width of Lei�, ±yard Avenue at Foothill Boulevard shall be -nate rec�s,�ucted to elimi tha 'dipped' section. (7) An In-lieu fee for one -half the Cost of the ' consttiz- on incAudfna 'lavdsca in ry A Nand Irrigation for 'fslao t 3 MedUn .wiihfn F'oothi'll Boulevard and for' urth the colt of construction of the sppecial WOPt to bid pl aceJ within the o roadway at the 3ntarse4tfons�` of Foothill Boulevard and Viney t l� Avenue'_ S ta'3 be paidO tp the City prior* to issua: e= buxldis perafts« 'rhe fee, nor *4 meth irr island shs _ _7 -7 PLANNING COR411MON K'SSOLUTION NO. CONDITIONAL i�,,PERMJ_r 87-26 - OAS January 27, Page 7,, be based '-'On tha 1 en 90 of the project's Foothill Boulevard frontage. The fee, for the special pavers bwd on the S*Srt ft*ntagv� of, the, interseetipps.- (8) The '�xis.,tifiq stor4o drw-ln syst ems within the Vihayard AVOMO/ : Fo6thill _' Boulew�rd - intor.sections, - shall be reconstructed to COP Aue to conv.AY , flows under Foothill onto Vi-ne1*4 Avenue to,_ the south and sh /also he designed to facilitate the�' future redirect&� of flows to the duciftnga -Cree. ChanneT to the WOSt,vla a storm drain system p��Wel to Foothill Boulevard. (9) GISP03al of on-site drainage all be acc*lished hy one of the following methods-41 order of -preference-"-' a. :0utlatted j directly into Foothill Boulevfrd through, a parkway culvert cient Sik t capacity is available as approve& by Ca7traiis�.� b. The private pipe system withi'' easemen4 ID13 private property connecting to the existing Storm drain system to tile ,sast. The installatton of a public. pipe system (24 �intho; pinimum dt,'tmeter RU)"within the Foothill Soule"�'r'd parkwayt connecting to the existing system to the east. An alternate Syst" as�, approved by the City Engineer. (10) Recl'iAtecal easemefits, $hall be, obtained �and proVided for' the construction, mainten�rvce, and us*. of the vCMCI& connections to the property to the East. (11) San Bernardino Road shal,,l be constructed ful 1 wi dth to include curb and--optter on the north side to the satisfaction of th-0) MY Engineer. T", portion of street improve*ntC -constructed 'onr the north side shall be subject to-, reimbursement upon development of the Property to the north. Building p4 Safety Division (1) The'tikkSt easterly di,fveway shall be rolled to preveni inflow to the satisfaction of the Building official. (2) Th� ha%north elevation�-, of Bufldings NG" and OF" shall, gutters along the north and west rocf, line to. be p1ped' out to the louth, independent of storm drain system, in Ord.' to, reduce th6r amount Of"J�l n-off to north, sum )'.6o;4 'drain from the S*�."! shall be I t�.ANNING GtiSSiON FlESOl.UTION �i0. , GOND ary 27� . �" f;41a�. SE tl PERMIT7 -2C OAS ITI f r` Janu 'Page � designed with two cutlets and thal1 be able to carry Garta(A the raquirod '4100. Neither of the two vutlots <' shallo pass under the buildings and. both- simll ttie H T$ a�ccas.1ble "fll-O intenaoca. This condition Shall be 5040ct t ' bQth City; Piann�r �#o Ouildidg Wficial review, and approval prior to,:issuanc�o� tui,idirPy perrir;ts b, ` The Deputy 'secretary to .;this-'Gomission shall certify fit} thp, adoption of this �esdlution. _ APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS i)TEi DAY OF::J"ARY,,, 1988 PLANNING COWISSION OF THE CITY OF RMCW Gumm" BY, _arry !, c e , a rpan ,ATTFSTe ran Ml 1 er, epucy re ryT` I. Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary `of the P Wing Comission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hsrty certify that the �oregoing Resolution eras duly and » regularly introduced, passed,, and adopted by the P1 an Goea<ission of the City of i#ancha Grrcaa"'a at a regular 1K in tof the P'�,hnning ICamission held on the 21th day of jamar,Y 1988, by the follo�a',�g vot�e!s�o -wit; AYES. C0144ISSTQNERS: NMS-. C&? USSIONERS: - ASSENT: COWSSIONFAS: ;\ f <,t 1I CITY 017 Iiw.ANCHO CUCAMONGA ' ST REPORT _ tia DATE January 27 1968 i, TO: Chairman and Heaiaers of the Planning Commission FKW.. Brad Buller, City Planner BY panty Fong, Associ'ate,;Planner a SUVECT: ENVIRi1*lE1tTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $7-26 e eve apme» u an n egr�I e shopp ing can er including the preservation of the exi6itn5 Thomas tiInc building totaling 111,000 square feet 611 10.51 acres ui,hand is the Specialty Commercial Di.strid�, logsated at the northeast corner at Vineyard .Avrnuo and Foothill Boulevard -_- Aldo 2,08.101 -1O and U. Associated wi% this protect is Tree, Removal Perrot 87 -52 requesting the remo ial of "wire 12 Mature ' trees consisting o#, , one Bottle tree, 6 Eli trees, "S. Syeawre trees and 1 Pepper ' tree: I. PROJECT MD,5ITE DESCRIPTION.. ;C A. Action.Reques ed Approval of a specialty commercial center, ae a e s e pan, elevations, tree removal' permit, aqd issuance of a Negative Declaration,' B. SurroundinR Land Use and Zonin o dwelling units peter acre) Homds; Low Residential (2.4 South Vacant, Liquor Store; Cwwnity Coamwercial District ing East _ $hopp Center; Community Commercial District. West Roller Rink, Restaurant, Unoc;gpiad DOding; Community Comgerci &I District' f G )General Plan Designations: j oject special-ITC-0mmercial itorth Low-Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per, acrell South Ccmunity Commercial East - Community Commercial West - Community,Commarcial D. Site rharadteristics: Currently, the site ts occupied by'Othe as Brothers W nary which is designated as a City Historic Landmark. There are other remn)nt winery buildings, such as � the still building, single Emily residence and garage!. The remaipder of the site is vacant. Vegetation consists of „ modee to cover of annual weeds and grasses in the northern 41 ITEk ti PLANNIf� Ci9�S`�SSTON �C'w REPORT COWITI OMAL USE PERMIT 87 -26 - OAS INftsm RS danuryF27, 1988 Page ;, t Portion of the site, . and in assurtmen�t'�of mature trees as well as fruit trees to the southern '"tion ,of, the site . The site =4%. slopes to south roughly air 2 \it is alsY�ithln the -the t Red Hill FaOt pecial Studfes 'Xotie, ,. E Parking Calculations: Kuwbei\ of Number of 0, Square Parming'`+ Spaces,, Spaces of Us Foot awe Rai Re ir0 Ptovided o Reat; Brant 6,000 ill: 0 : •' 60 60 1,628 I /5u 30 s0 Office 6„O00 V 2 .; 24 24 Retail 971376 1/250 390 390, r TOtal 111,003 _ 503 F. Applicable Regulations: The developotnt of a shopping center if;7-Noject vo, a cry onai Use Permlt #cording. to the current , Development Code and roothill,,BOulevard +Spedf ;r, Plan'. ` Ii. ANALYSIS: A. General: The developer is progosfnq to conv°t` thb exiating' � o"s7 Urothers Winery and the still" building to a specialty i retail use with a musegm, in the "still" building. They are also proposing to °regi`ster this City's ie ignated Historic S Lan11 on the National Historic Landmark Register. Thar � remainder of the „sit$ is to be daveTepsed as "a specialty retail, mixed -use commercial center, currently, there are two prospective” tenants in this center - Irvine Rioch Market in j L ng O n Souplantation Restaurant in Suildlnq ski, � B. Op rtunities and Constraints: The site is unique r o reasons: j .owing i. It has three street frontaget-, with o historic I midmark boil -ding at the corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue , 2. This corner is designated as the Activity Center where the Foothill Boulevard Spec(,Xf` plan recognizes this historic significance and allows-T& special development standards In landscaping, setback, streetscape design, to be determined at the Design Review process 3. The corner of Yinkwd Avenue and San Bernardino Road also <+ ` calls for some special consideration in design as it is the AUL most, visible corner from the north, south and east rand Iraf io. )P'LANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERNIT,87 -U OAS IN V£STtsiS Janaery 27, 1988 Page S t - r1 ' Giv.n such site characteristics and, constraints, the design f > goal of the proposed projeert is A;; to upstage-'the historical, winery building, but with the new building to create subtle contr � between the. new rand the old. 'The proposed site Plan . %? dust the new buildings at tha corner of Vineyard Avenue and $0 Bernardino Road, and along the east property boundary. Smaller now builadings are clustered behind the winery around an ' enlarged plaza area to create a focal point, :;=Continuous Pedestrian connections - throughoat r he site have been provided to link to this major, plaza 'focal ,point area. Wor access will be provided Mw San Bernardina Road,'Vineyard Avenue and Foothill BoUl,evard. The architectural style:, reflects the agricultural heritage <,of the winery with such eleaesnts as lintels- ,above opanings, vine coved :arbors,, gabl)O roof with wood shingles; authentic =river Kock, heavy wood beans and trellises. S. Design = Review Committee. The Committee fChitfiea. Tolstoy. -' Kro ly rev. erfed this project on November 19, 1987 arit, raised numero+.:s design and t%chnical - .Issues in the site � elan des1gn,.Ae1a4l1ng of eldvations� the speetal treatment ate' the ,Activity Center, and laodscaping. The developer has been working diligently with staff and the iomarit4ae -in deve`9a�:Ing. plans to best meet the City's applicable Codos and the concerns of the Comittee. on January ', 1988, the _CowltteC^ (Chjt ea, McNfie1, Kroutil reviewed the:;revised development' plans` again and siatea that most of tj^_* technical and design issues raised at the lest Weting had been `resolved. Flokever, the C,- Awittee identified soce major concerns that needed to b4 ',refined and resolved prior to the_ ing Ccwission ;neeting. The Committee provided di fion to the applfi::ant preparing-.} plans to address and resolve thcse rAjor concerns as- follows: 1. The activity center de's-Igo Is acceptaole, however, the developer should consider using 11* same` authentic `rives rock treatment on any proposed monumeni sign, , 2. The sppltctnt provided the Committee with a;, L�. enlargement of d -ttall.s and Full material samples including such details as the painted smooth- finished piaster, the half circle gutter; -*Ough finish stucco - over, roof ed e�hail steel Braces, textured pave is ,"rfkf,ca 0, et.. Howevv` i the Committee is ' concerne& with the. - simple. clean at and stated tK;:,4 additional arch 3 elements and �taYi'#ng shdUld be ed, such a$ more richness to the roof edge, multi -pane windows with either WGpd or grayish tone al�sminum mullion, variatfon 'tos'torefront design such as pop -put /recess and river rock base, etc. i ' PLUNING, CtM -WON STMF REPORT CONDITIOM UBk,S PMMIT 07 -25 - DAS INVESTORS January 27,. 1998 �� w Page 4 !' 40 Th, a proposed drehitecturaY treatment for Building,- G at the corner of San Bernardino Road and (" Vineyard avenue did not meet the Committee's expectations. The corner architectural treatment ta� the building "should be substantial and bold enodgh to serve as a 'secondary focal point.'' it should be able to attraot� and draw north, south And east bound traffic to use the main access off $$an Bernardino, Road. 4. The first neway off San .Bernardino ,Road should be redesigned as the, main entryway to the site 4 expanding landscaping on the east side of to Ij driveway and by cofteoing the east elevation of Building "P" through terracing the second story. 5 proposed archtter�t;�, for the _. Sounti -�- .jrilding IfCwtldiog "A "))f -T'_ 6 t�sistent nth the ati+le entire center. Elevations *a 6 designed ,.which tie -in the building as part of the canter; especially cdn teFaas of roof line, architectural, elements, and detailing. such as color, material, wins mullions, tre:lises, etr The Committee also ;stated that neon si s are proMbited by the 51gn Ordinance, ,f1e the I proposed light i:ixtwes should be ccrpatible to the one used by the center and should -rtot be of bright lights. 6. The above items shou'.d,o' - resolved prior to the � Planning Commission ., etfng. If these, items have en j not be reaaIved -by then, they would be placed as conditions o #- ;Oproval and to be re$Oved prior to plan check process. f The Design Aeviev Committee iChitiea, McNie3, Kroutili is schMaled to nevi", the revised plans on Jareua�y 21, 1988. The action df the Cow , ttee will be fo6tarded by separate addendum historic Preservation'Commissfign: The Comm3ss #on, on August 6, 98 par spa a in a o n workshop with ;the Planning Commission to review the conceptual development Mans for thi; project. The Commissicn also on November 5, 198,7 inforaLally reviemd this .project specifically the convers ;on of the to specialty retail use and found them to be acceptable. Oq-,-- Ceceaber 3, 1987, the Cammi -ssion conducted a nuaiic hearing and�-�2 -f apprbvz;A a SMCUl use permit and alteration permit for converi;ing the,,'' pinery building and the "still" building to specialty - re use. n PLANNING COWISSiON STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERY5_1 87-26'- OAS INVESTORS January 27, 198E Page 5 D. Free Removal PerWt 87 -521 The developer is also request- g4o remove a existing trees d Elm gees, S 1�, a „ trees and I Pepper tree as shorn in Exhibit OKx. The exfsting Battle tree adjacent to the %st$11" building will be ' preserved. Based on the Arborist;s repo; t submtted, the Ma i or health and. are not worthy of retention. The treesaeQres and , Pr are vpropow 1 not s4st'ain a relocation andn flit th improvements. 1U developer is proposing to mitigate the I rMvai of t'-Mss trees With AIMMU4 24, inch ix�x size tees for all these teens .in the trae wells w;thin the plaza area.- The e Tree Pre$t"aci49r iirdinuace required replateatan , with *Sbe .. Largest nursery nPriwn trees available", which is either inch - FnY►1ron "ta5 a ee # Mb f [ efi;Rr ec s an has deter,etned that the de ilopw{gnt �' of this project �jmay have the following .po ties' adverse impacts; e ,1 1. Soils and 6eolcgx - The develnpnt of this project i I� 1 r MaY expose or properties to U geologic hazard such as earth iak ground failur* Or Similar hazards - as tt�e..prajec silt is within the City designated Roc! hill Paull Special Sttr(do$ zone. ieiti ation MUM - A geo;�ogic` study has been Iq 1 p►m►� a cTeter" tie the lwation of the Red Hill Fault through trenching ctht Cite diagonaily from northwest to southeast. 'Tool study - concluded that no kno m active faults across the Project site were .pond and no on -site evidence for faulting WAS '�'?Howsver observed. - #'b this study recommended that reinforc nt of foundations mind slabs be considered to reduce the potential of foundations and slabs cracking from long, term effects of soil adjustment after: eatrthva)rk and construction operations are completed. 'Me .,:City designated geologic consultant has revie"d this report and Found it to be bamplete and adequate in addressing the State A1401t- Priolo Act. 2. Dra - The development of this projtrt may expose people or, propNrty to, water: related hazard's ° such as fflcoding» MifigW07t Measures - A drainage/hydrology stud �r� J has De" rov that determined the mitigation �i` measures to handle surface water including the 160 U ;year flood which are incorporated into the project design or were added as conditions of ;ppronat, PLAtl ING 'COWISSION STAFF REPOPT,1 L CONDITIONAL USE KRMiT 87;46 I ) OAS INVESTORS,!,I Janiaryt 87, im Page S u, I 3. Traffic The development of lthis project will r n�"'crsaxe veh €cular traff €d. Viniyard Avenue, being An urkdarrs €xed street for.�that yoju to „of traffic, of be axle to `-� traffit� at oh, acceptable l ei i !taiga i xxuPe? .. A detailad Alfgnatnt study On ney Foothill a' levard And son ;r aernard€no Road has beery provlf+ � i7ris data €less',:, study est ” his the required Y ght -of -etay alnd the! €pin ' str of the lanes Vineyard Avenue Foothill 807001rd And tart Bern rdino Road in DrdVe I 1; to maye - traffic at art acceptable level. furthers . thic ,`�rojeot h'as been d@iiigned vith a enttyway "'; off San Beroar -Ono Read so tat, to xttrkk _r {" thw bulk of the traffic from 'the north, south aria 4. noise - the --fl of, this project "noise ncrease levels fo,_ stp�te faro; residences to thy" north. "kt�is impacted by road noise. Mitigation Measures - The noise study subwltted to -W smr LlTy trtdiU that the limit of the 70 noise corrtottr €s, approximately 70 feet i'rcxs�� Foothill Boulevard and 30 nett froar Vineytara 1 Avenuea The plaza area is Situated behind the Wnery building and in the middle of the site . lbOrefort, the noise generated by traffic would have negligible impact to est�40 plaza Aran,. However, the 'i rudy rectmatends 11 that a detailed acoustical study xha T be provided to determine the sonseraction �'h for reduction of interior raise to tf - -Acceptable level of 46 db pr €oe� is ISSUance off building permit. Also, the study MOW"" that construction Activities near residential Areas be 114it4d to doyti>ae hours frm 7 A.M« TO 7 P.M. On weekskyx. ZelivM activities } Should also be limited to tee game dSytime hours. Basest on the above mitlgatio" measures, Some of which leave been incorporated into the Project and the remainder befog added as conditions of approval, Staff has determined that there,,will r not be any significant impacts as # result cif this project,° If 'Planning the Cokwiss €on concurs= with these findings, issuance 'W a negative 0#04ration mould be appropriate. (3 r fL` r: i PLOMNIN6 COWI OR STAFF REPORT. CONDITIONAL USE Pf;,RMIT 87 -25 - OAS INVESTORS January 27, 1488 1 Page 7 ItI. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project ti`� Plan A ' I Boulevard SW11 of the pr0oct creaa a COMAunity deli: enhances the uniqu �Nracter and identi proposed project facilitate�a afficien pe"jtrr ah traffic; and Ae project mii tejn�yt that with thye�88eutral that expresses and Rancho Cucawiga; the safe vimicul ar and 1 the h1dhest vossible conditions of approval are, :n,) #frrcas h the FtistFi11 (% Boulevard Specific :plan and {f #1 Other opplicibl; provisions af' th3 City standards.. T't * project wits thee; `adds+ mitigation sutures, wilt not cause "'Agnificant ad arse `aenvir~tal impacts. r ry # pry IV n RICO#" itepper. i trams i g nctica►s were sent to� all wy in foot of the P���� proje� site and within that entire Subarea 2-Of the Foothill' 9oulevara3 Specific Flan. Art .addition, the xit+e '. G° been posted for public hearing« V. IRECOkMENDATIM. Staff rpcoewueaads that the Planning Gt> ssinn approve on'8ii%a,ai Use» Pefi'atit 87 -26, TreaEMav1i Pewstit and -8742. _ Issue a Negativae UacTaritfQn. - Re «fully , $nra �� eifty Pr nne 88NF':te Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "p8" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "C" - Mailed Sites Plan Exhibit RAO - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "* - Concept") ±irading plan Exhibit "F" - Activity Center `treatment and Site Furniture Exhibit 46" - Sidewalk Oeaign on Vineyard Avenue Exhibit "ti" - Elevattons Exhibit "I" - Oetail.y of °Architectural Elements Exhibit "J" - Storefront Design Exhibit "K" - Tree Location Map ? Tree Removal permit 87 - -52 Letter frost° keborist Resolution of Approva'i with Conditions r s rt ... n r. r 0 Z: FY. S rod J` n 2II tars_ ;�yFK* ful fit!$ #` t •... ...... ill � w 3 ,k Nt t y} m tT A 1 Ilk J11 k Ut �4 x� exaR px.8ex•8 � �8� !a � i -- "a� �4i�i�M %% ge _. __ ,s 3i t {q� 1i1 I f � 444 till �i ��sE ; Y _ It-if Agri& 70 eN V-7- Nil- If r i1.. c ? I Il 00 lit x ■6 ' Y i\ Q e3 Ail 3 pry, YfZ �r lgg!yytt i1i+v IN 7. '"• � �.. � ti ALk as4 P kt �'! � iiy ' t J fix fit Em QeVn3inaac .1714.tana 4 QDo lil n z a' r h �° i�aa it lie ZeMf s `t t #��' !tit Ilk 'r w L i,. s 9 ILE �- M M 4 %? .: k '�` +... r 0 V b d l MY CF n EM- PLANNING DFVISM CXHIE #- n VIM �Ilclp 7PiChF AS WTUEAY OMW *SAM AWr A Gwww P.6wayr NORTH crry OF � r1112L f \7 AAj 14 IV �- VMS Q i .sAwl' w ♦, �.. 4,�y� .y�• ice: +w r r a; c �1 7 a� fir/ WL �.� f;,. ��.• a M1!►Naa fil, li tIR \af 41/i \ftlN.4.�x l " Mali' /t M 'a= All TECH L. RAN F�S, Ph.D. ,, PROFESSMOF:aigpoGY�5;(i SULTANY-- ENVIRQIVftOTALASSESSMENT ` Table 1. fttvr& Tres vr'11* vinwvm& Pxo eat Ate, �:�trc�ozsge, imm:ter %sue sx�azes Gizr�ena�a 8ali� Go�td�,t�.sru I 1' Boi�1e '1��^� 'fir ' � - �e�^" "' ��• �+� 21 Elm ° 'QLMP am i au&o 7Fxt 25 poo; 3 >m —rte 57 o� 1 7 75 24 P*or 10 California SpCt=n, =e - Plat9aus 2m mm m 75 Ip 50 poor 7 7 - Utv„ ameiaxsa 35 " fi$ or i2 � - 'iflatete arj„tex3, _ � ��, -p3o� 13 MIM12M 75 24 paar CITY CF ,f ii+L'!L'ailYM Df VISWN 1�.(LL 31 F w°I.aRL.GF e,.�FMe. X91[ L3r�X NOW:: °Fuifett(4. '4i ?tlrnia$ 3¢ i�I'WMi+�,F����'1'�1•5 �R�_ ui Dimar, Ca. $177 QP :t Pl�mese ,� 17! @3ti3L1®.TdYI� lit Ir V V Aug wIj. i� ♦,. 5�`,``y` z fry s1 0 z z a. 1 L!! CL LU W M 0 LL. 0 z LU 1� a 4- City of Cucamonga Tretv Removal Permit OUT DEVELOPMN Ordinance No. 276, pertaining to the preservation of trees en private property, regclr n that no person remove or relocate any woody planae Irt excsse of flfteM (15) feat: in height and huing a single trunk circumference of fifteen (16) Inch" or more, and mulfhtrunM having a clrcu,:vference ut thln`v (30) Inches or more (measured fwtnty four (24) Inch@% fro+a.ground la:si). wilitirat first obtalnina a Tree Removal Permit from the City. LOCATION OF SUBJECT SiTEI. 8916 FlvtWr NAME, ADDRW% TELEPHONE OF APPLICAW. � g•w +sirWaea tree, Suite 29ui.^ Tiwine_ M.42715. 17Tb1 `X'1'S-%2h6�'r'S n*1rt- 14 NAME, ADDREtL6, TELEPHONEOF PROPEWWWOWN00i `'M.aii' REASONS FOR REMOVAE attachnocssssrydwJ Sr URGIUMt�'t_� neceeg- grading in order to �Ieaent the w4p, sQjL'g essia4 21"'plan. (seer attached arboriat reuort) PROPOSEDP�IETHO , ^F REMOVAL 00012ceeant dusirise aradine_eativitiese =i:ft _ _ DATE: ! 7 This applIcaUg.phall InGIWA plot plan Indicating locattiori ai all trees to N removed and retained. The species, , and size Qf the trees to be removed sltmmfl be so designated. If a tree is diseased, then a writt ant from a licensed arborlst stating the nature of the disease shall be required. FI-1, APPROVED By: ❑ DENIED Reasons: Date: Notification of application shall be given to property owners :vlthin a three'hundred foot radius to aye prior to approval if no appeals are received, then the permit shall become effective ten (10) days f hE date of action. This approved tree removal permit is valid for 90 days from the date of final map recur for or building permit issuance, whichever comes first. Should applicant fail to remove the trees within this 9( day period, a now permit shall be required, unless aj extension Is requested fourten (14) days prior to tht expiration of the permit. 1-k -.2 1 ,TED L. HANES, !h.D,. __ - ^PFESSbtitJF 8loLt?GY • C4irLTAN7 E�1VtRG�NMEN7kL ASSESSMENT J'ulr 21 19`97 Mr« Thomas G. Grabl* ' HepetWoh Azaly*t u�.8S1Che7i T&�.8rS03 Ai8t141'atfl� t7: 339 Rain Xi$u4 Daiwa Suite 2w rtewparc 3604h, California, 92660 0, Fes Tree retwva l on The Vineyard Axojeot Raveho Gumimong-A" 1 Deer Mr, Greblet 0 I bar# evaluated th- fisting ssature �Z" s on 'The V'ine;wd �%1T1QzX0' P U ties* xi a, c- acam0 m trees axed orA&- wintal shade trees to Urg*, native aicoataoxe *:Ws. ` r-ttne of the treed' a-&* mixable for relooturN tae to their soar health tsr symmetxy,t,or bRgauae they axe too `2,argo to attgt3Asafully. The atta�&ed table liAs all taws by name, aim ersxsoas and hei t,r ,. Tree Oo��le moo) is a health r speoiman `kI&wowtbr at retention, if possible, T=ees 2„ 3, So 11, 12, and 13 (En Trees) ars in poor haaath snd are not worthy of a:etertion„ Trees 4s 5o 6s %r and 10 (8yosmoves) and 9 (Pepper) are in food health and wtPrthy of retention if possible. Vone of these trees OMIA be reloo*Ud auoaesb�ul.ly, 1{ Several large aVooado3 aprioot amd" � ci:Txestti trees exist axouLA an aba*- doned residence northeast of the wi4eijr. These are all in very poor condition due to lank of tinter andtienezT sxa« stone of these aria Wort%- -,of retontion. If I may be of further assistance,, please fees free, to "call on me« ° ;. Sincexely `�a �; =� Ted ,b„ 4gea Gdi'++w Stara Ur:werS�tY �� � 4 = F14111Ct..trp}r(OF..�MIy/i� Syt� - .�&_�' - ( ?144 tX)44O v OP �I,j4 _ '! �k1V#rk RESOLUTION NO. A`RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO 1oWAH0 PU(Nrwk )&;r ISSIiiw „ APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PEMIT NO. 87:26 F&- - -'i'HE DEVELOPMENT OFD °A SPECIALTY COIiFlERCIAL dEFiTER INCLUDINi THE PRESERVATIO'it OF THE EXISTING WINERY BUIL.OING 10TALING � �r 111 PA SQUARE FEET Oil 10.51 ACRES OF LAKD LOCATED Vik, THE NOR,�..�41' CORk -R OF VINEYARD AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BW EVARD Ik THE SPECIALTY COAMERCIAL DISTRICT Di` d FOOTHILL BOULE4ARil SPECIFIC PLAN , APH,294I01-IO 11 A. Recitals. (I) OAS "Investors has filed an app±. atioea for the issuance of the Conditional Use P�rmaft o. 87»26, as descr bed in the title. of this Resolutiop. Hereinafter fit this ± iesolution, the subject C,nditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application", (ii) On the 27th of JanuAjry, 19E , tae Planning icommmission of the E City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a du�j noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearlrlg on that date. (III) Af1 1ergel prerequi tes to tine adoption of this Reso} ttion = ` have occurred. r B. Resolution. ldOYl, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commmission of the, City o €ante Cu asmonga as fallnws: 1. This `G ssion hereby . specii•ica�lly finds that all of the facts set forth in the Reci 1s, Fart A,, of this Resolution are true and correct. ?„ -, Based upon substantial *vidence presented to this Commaissfion during the above- referencod; public hearing on January 27, 1981 including written and oral staff rAports, together: with public tea mony, this Comxmission hereby specifically finds as follows: (al, The application applies to, property bounded by Foothill Boulevard, Vineyard Avenue and San Bernardino Road with a street frontage of 1,845 feet and lot depth of 705 feet and�Js presently vacant with an. existing winery building and a still building; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is single family homes, the property to the south of that site is partly vacant and partly developed with a liquor stora, the property to the Last is an existing,. shopping center, and the properxy,to the west is an existing roller rink and restaurants. 0 PLANNING COMISYION RESOLUTION W* UNDITIONAL USt Pr Rtil T 87 -26 - OAS ` Page 2 (a) 'this project complies frith the'Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, in that; the design of the project 'creates a community design image the e:•presses and 60tances the unique character and identity of Rai7cho Cucamonga the proposed project facilitates efficient '4rd! safe vehicular and pedestri,n traffic, ante the project maintained. the highest possible q�silty of the environment by- balancing the impacts of deve`lopmAnt to ' 4 surrounding areas. in addition, the proposed. use, building design,, and site plan, together with the recomme6ded conditions of approval t are In compliance with., the Foothill Boulevard ,Specific Plan and 'all other applicable provisions o €; the Cityfs standards. /� (d) The identified potent,t t drre,a �enr3rdnar�trtal" impacts fta've' been addressed with mitigation measuraS being added to the, project and J added as conditions of approval to ensure this project would not result in a decrease in envirorm►eft07 quality, 3:`, Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during tie above - referenced public hearing and upo» th4 spedific findings of facts set forth in paragraph f and.2 above, this Coftfssiertr hereby finds and concludes as follows: t r (a) That the proposed use is in accor+A* with the 1 General Plan, the, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the "site- is located. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental tc the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to propertibs or improvements in the vicinity, (c) That the proposed use cemplies with each of the applicable provisions ' ,he OAYelopment Coda. j 4.. This Gomuission hereby finds and certifies that tto project has been reviewed and Considered in compliance with thj;California Environmental i Quality Act of 1970 ar<d, further, this Commission hereby, Issues 'a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the 'findings and conclusioas set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this CoWwssion hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this raf+erencer Planning Division Jv� (2) All free - standing walls including retaining wai shall be of authentic river rock material with G decorative caps. :: PLXt3liINC "ISS1DN ftES UTION. AVa COMIT169AL USE PER141T 7_26 - OAS January 27, 198E _ Page 3 Alh (2) Low level open fe�"�or solid wall at th4 top opthe Be ardino scope apurks Road shalt be provided for s safety purposes„ Detailed design -hall be siQeft to City Planter, rmifew andapproval. (3) Sufficient shopping cRrt,corrals shall be provided,., within the parking area, ie_st of Building "D" to theµ. satisfaction of the City Planner. G (4) Reciprocal driY *ay access and pedestrian a rsss ease nts, shall= obtained be obt frrm the e&aterly:; adjjcent � b t1a owner and shall be recorded prior to 'issuance g permit. The developer shall also obtiia autia9rization to perform oft -sib wofie at the a3terly property., (5) The final design of the two pedestrian connections to the easterly property shall be subjsct to Cit planner -, review and approval prior to issuance of buildin�_3 permit. The po trian eonnectim, between Buildings " A and S " shall include pedestrian AMenities such as [ seating benches,= landscapfng and sufficient lighting —� for sAfetylsecurity purposes, etc „, - to, the satisfactlon,of the City Planner. (6) The iii. design of how this 6 foot landscape area along the east property 'boundary will interface the aciacent protect shall be .suhiect to City. Planner review and approval prier to ,issuance of building , r; permits.. (7) The €iral design of detailed cro:.;S sections "B" dw r j ! and pertaiAingoto height of reta ;,` jFng avail and ' slope area shall be subject to (xgy Alantler review and s ` approval prior to issuance of any permits. () All lighting ft xturas s(� 'thave a sh +ling mechanise to prevent light and G I (g) The rewval of the 12 Mature trees shall ;-require replacOnent in kind with the largest nuesery' grown trees:availableQ as determined by the,City Planner, applicant shall submit` docu(aentation of replacement, including a plan�, to the City Planner prior tq the removal of ttie trees. , (10) The existing BQttleff tree next to tote still bu'3lding - shall be preserved if possible._ If noti, replacement; in kind small be rewired in accordance with Condition Ma. B. , ar ... .._..,......._ _.._.�._._. »mot_: .... .. :. 'tip A .. i� PLANNING COWISS1W R €SOLUTION NO. GONDITIQl1ti(. USE PERMIT 87-26 O.Jkg January '17; -1988 Page 4 (11) The :final detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be subject to City Planner review and approval ' prior to issuance of boildin permit« (12) Authentic river rock materials shall be utilized for this anti t'e project. A 4 foot icy 8 foot test sect; on siral !+�* caarplettd for inspection and approval by the Planning bivisionpriar to installation. (13) A uniform hardscapv and" znxweet furniture treatment, inOudinq) traO cy1t s, free- standing potted aaoalards, benches, ate., plants., ra r liit shill be u ize for thopping center. and shall be designed to .be compttihle with the architectural i #xyl @. Details_d designs shall btu submitted for, Planning Division°' review and approvIlIq prier aaxAanFe of bulldi g permits, �.; (14)) All mood ueam, trellis, and arbor Nark shalt to of € heavy duty Weber sub3ect to City Planner reviews and r approval. f1s) All dglivery activity alongi the' rear service driveway still occur between the hoirs of 71zg�K, oqd 7�P AM, on we�&days. (16) A detailed acoustics) slut e> to detiei itne the construction scethod for the reduction of interior ,. noise to the acceptable level of 45 db shall be ' submitted to the Planning Ovision and Building and J Safety Division for review and approval prigr to issuance of building permits. (171 Construction traffic shall occur between tits -OUrs of 7 AA and 7 P.M. on weekdays. (18) The sail Study shall address the issue of reinforced foundations and slabs as outlined in the geologic report completed by Owen Geutechnical (projects « 4144.1 -1) prior to issuance of tuilding permits. r (19) The lease agreement "for all tenants shall have a clause indicating the site ,is withn the City's" adopted Bed 111117 Fault Sped l Study Zone. Ill language for suet- clause shalt ,b! subject to City'" ,Planner review and approval. A copy of the lease agreewyent' with the above clause shall be filed frith the City prior to isssaltrsce.of building permits. PLANNING 4ISSION RESOLUTION NO. � 1� CONDITION& WE KNIT 87=26 - OAS January 27 Page 5 (20) The site -shall be deVelo . d anti maintained in accordance with the approvea size p!'an" NT -affc -TncTudes architectural elevations, exterior materials., ands, color ;, landscaping, -sign programs, and grading on file with the planning Division, the conditions contained therein and Development Cade regulations... o Engineering Qiy�ision (1) Overhead Utili Us, a. �frr 7�eeecia�"n�"caMon and electrical. #Xcept 66 Kv ,iectricsli on the project site of Vineyard Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the north side of San pernardino Road to the first 'dole an the snuta side of Foothill { Boulevard, prior to }ublic Improvement, acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first.,- The deveio"r way, request a reimbursement agreement to rot6j4y, one -halm the City adopted f` cost for undergrounded from future development I (redevelopmen ) as it occurs on the opposit4 side ii of the street. `✓� b. can Berrar� a�--�,Road - An in- lieu "fee : can r -4 . �n Tj ie uture undergrounding of the l lusting overq.ad utilities (telecommunications) _ bn the apposite Jr side of San Bernardino Road shall be paid to the city prior to issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one -half the City adop'tsd unit amount times the Iength fr* the center, of Vineyard Avenue to the east Aject boundary, (2) Upgrade, modifications, and relocations, as necessary, of the traffic signal at the ir- tersections of Foothill Bouieva'r-u and Vineyard Avenue and San Bernardino Road and Meycrd Avenue, shall be the responsibility of the developer. The relocation and modification shall be to the satisfaction Of the City Engineer. l (3) Additionin right- of-way for right turn lanes on Foothill Boulevard and San Sernardirfo Road shall be dedicated at ultimate street widths as shown on the aperoved striping plan. (4) Off site street improverents necessary for " traffic safety an the Wast side of Vineyard Avenue shall be 7 congteUCiN to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, V ! �r PLwING COMISSI&a RESOurtION io. CONDITIOKAL USE PERMIT 87-26 - OAS January 21, 1980 Page 6 W An encrotchment peralt is required for the arbor which extends into L 'ize PWIC street right-of-way oo Vineyard Avenue. (6) The i; width of Yim,%yard 4venue at Foothill Al e reconstructed to eliminate the mdf=wjl,iishall f*(�ion. (7) -.An in -lieu fee for one-half the cost of the COnStruttlan -including landsc4pirp5 and Irrigation for the island median within loothill Swleyar# and for one-fourth the cost of coWittuction of tWe special pavers to be Placed within, the roadway at the intersectlw of fbot�-111.'Aloultvard and VfneyUd Avq,nue shall be paid to +U" catty prior to issuance or pert 4.' Nilding pert 'Me fee for the median Island shall be bor,% � ,�xe length, of the praject-s._=Foothill frontagm. 'The fee for the special pavers shi.11 be based 0-,;" he square frontage of the intc`rsectio to 6 "j (9) The existifiI4 storm ortin s�t;tems within vhe Vineyard . 1��_'� Avitnue/ Foothill Boulevard �l inumsectiont shall be reconstructed to continue to , nvey flow under Foothill # outlettinq onQ-�)",141nOYArd Averut to �qulevard Ine , the south. and shall 4,130 De designe ' to facilitate the futur6 redirection of . flows to the Cut4maga, Creek Channel to the west via a st6m, drain systeen parallel to Foothill B601evard,,' (9) Disposal Of ;'Pft-site drainage "Shall bA accomplished by One Of the fetlowing methods In order of preference: a. Outletted d1roctly into ,foothill Boulevard c through a parkway culvert if sufficient str6t capacity is available, as U-pprOVE-d by Caltrans. b. Ue inst&114001, :Of a PrIV4te pipe sysUm, within easements an private property;' connicting to thd existing storm drain Vstem to the east. c. 'the installation of a OU61ic pipe system Q4, inches mit0ma diameter kcp) within the Foothill Boulevard pay"ys connecting to the existing system. to the "'last. d, An alternate system As approved by the City Engineer. (10) ReciprocaL oasewt I shall be" cbtained and provided for the construction, maintenance, 4�,d use of the vehicle connections to the property to the east. 4 o PLANNING COMMISSIOK RES&UTiON 00. !l CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -26 - OAS January 27, 1988 Page 7 (11) San Bernardino Road shall be constructe,4 full width to include curb and gutter on the north side to the satisfaction of the Engineer. The portion of ' street ,improvements instructed on the north side shall be subject to�eimbctrseftnt upc- developteent of the'property to the north, Suilding; and Safm mvisio.- (1) The moss easterly driveway 3na1"i be roiled tab prevent inflow to the satisfaction cf the Building official. (2) The north elevations of Buildings "V and "F" shall have gutters along the north and "st,roor 1_ine to be piped out to the south, indepej;wnt of stori- drain system, in order to reduce the "amsaunt of run' -off to north sumps. Storm drain from the sumps Ql be, designed with two outlets and shall be able to carry twice the required? Q100.. Neither q1 the two uatlets shall pass under the buildings anti both shall be easily accessible for *aintiananw. This tnTidition shall be subject to both ity Planner end S.jildingr Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. i 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certif to the adoption of this Resolution.'; APPROVED AND ADOPTED rNIS 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF gMCp �g CUCAtdON61C BY: arry IT. WWI, Mairman ATTEST. Brad Buller, epuiy` ecreiary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning CcsWssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regodlariw in*ra Ued, passed, and adopted by the:, Planning Commission of;the City of Bancha Cues„ n;n. at a regular *eeiAwi of the Planning Commission hf:Id_ on the 27th day of, January, 19W, b3 tit+ 6 fol o,�ing vote -to -wit. AYES,; COi*7ISSIONERS: NOES. COMMISSIONERS . Ci ABS9NT: CtiWISSIONFASt "'", �.� WLyYw�t{pa a s Is wl:. �' ~'■ d\yy���{Oayyw �lA tl� /IdL `4p� w� qQ rill vi jith. ING Il 1 # -a x a~ Ail R Y4T il+ir' ^Nit .11 4, f t - p-0-61= ii L N #i Ta °f Sr'° 4yr _. lk ff If �. .. - 3 rig /i if CHry e Iih-sl µall; few IR M ' v 1 Y l✓ hlf Jl � � - ear j t - p-0-61= ii L N #i Ta °f Sr'° 4yr _. lk ff If �. .. - 3 rig /i if CHry e Iih-sl µall; few IR M ' v 1 Y l✓ hlf Jl � � - e`i . y a _ �4� w._.. ..il_+S�Zr{r ".. ��i;iP•.�'�'��!!!�� �= ..��Si G.''�'a� ... �qy. �Mi� - �_.., N-iq..r _. ,.. .. = r� :iA Yea I � _ - w �Qjl �fj } }} e VTL SIN U-1 Y TE M Nit to f�� ;�g}� gp i tl =sg x= ta" 1e+ M y'Ny �Y{ ty _ $. y H 2 lip �MSM iyY A..6' I.i M MSP$ ¢�,�jy 1p3iiiia y..'6 ^fd _ 'OF..- R �P� .`.� •• }\ r TO - . M Hia,�yi Q a. rLi a i�.W y `- Yyj 1 SSyri ji ; tJYQIW b x -pc,u 4P a — Y � V Y le- _ �\ �•. ��; »s.€ Fyn�- it 0 c s� •�N : q alp ;n: r X. y p4 Sk r. ; TR �i s r 7�j1$y1t }M bf F � r t iii- K u.°. ►. r.li �g +'�'� w � �5 �� M R'bo. �• Y ° ° U ll fit p a .. a.. a s r Sz C iQg�M i pp i IM « �Y sip ae a � e $ 'Noll s` xq� YYY N +Mi y Wg y J.. L..� w "iM ` yy�yY4 y��� qy�o� i3 s a0w i=i I W3' ri•A'S W li YY, U1 y A I2� N i 4 ..�gi all Sig *w w P Of SRI till N W! i yyJ �M M Ila als si Ias �. a i S! 'Z4 i y` V CYJ aye p • � lrep 6 6� 511y66r p�Ii MI N. it `C�: M 2*. 14 Q A� _ Y iy� ;�_ g Gs0. ^ 'N nay � s� l ��� ���� I r`' k ^� f N INS Ins v+ � s q. aa f AN TB f 2t is Q � 9 x s + sill ~xi. it 11 A its IL -� N L qK 9 • ='s g" Its " ii SA, P.• •VY ifs lowhy A* ge t YOVr� b U fig it ZV 21 liaP TL sib ® N. � N11. �. Yy ✓M $r fflu lah Pig per- j «. i PTL IN As INI 41D A; Sill W1 i N M irJ .� tiN �h o � R i I � vx tri I i a 6 3 . 2 y� K 9 L yy� � N ry ♦7 ♦. Ali Q US {E7 F 1 7 i `X -77 _ p ! sW _ • yds.: y ant p yy YH `y � � y � V ♦ p� qy� }� Ali � �Y ` i� � ^.� ■ 1! � iaE ff � � yC� ��'{! _ �lf� ■yM+-�{•• w q.'� � y +�.� ��T'�y s� u � d �Q Y 1rt'y�l�. aye '� V •R. Y Ryy� �. Mpg M �M p. » y„w y � �l ff�� i i h ka J_ Big fit x 3{Sb N�fl d WMd 15 3= 1 , P A all Ito it q 5114, A H is hip. It y Lit eyA qR rr fir'' yyyy.. a Wr- 3 } � N4 - ,all i M. Y Vw V s ^q b 44 I a M M .. oil _ < ir w jai «map 66 0� ■ ff a VI Ito it q 5114, A H is hip. It y Lit eyA qR rr fir'' yyyy.. a Wr- 3 } � N4 - ,all i ii Apw a s m s it Y Y AYV M� Y of t M } i a n $' J yaa+". ��q° a W4, N gg JEW 29 Z ZEN 66 r Ir •_ e. Y � 4 e lal 73 l y ` Je yy p EkIR r .� r si L � V a J��a .%„ ¢t YS u S. --V ,N t N:Y F8 :pp �M••N V$� ��. A r/Yi aP 613►, =: SZ t ; -J { r cr, Y OF RANCH v CAMONGA PORT tu . DATE: January, 27, 1588 TO! Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission'., it isn j AM: Brad Buller, City Pla per I. BY: Debra Meier, Associate Planner 0 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 1W53 - su Y 3 on -07 45.49 acres of a in t* one _2U.1 acre lot in the Moiva� (8 -14 dwelling units per acrei jind WivawNigh (14 -2* Oft1ling units per acre) Districts and 125 jingle family, 'dts on 25 «25 acres in the W,ti ` Low- Mediu%° i4 -8 dwelling units- acre) District . �'Within rt the Victoria PianiW ; &4 unity located at the northeast comer, of use tine R(:ad and Milliken Avenue APR,. 297- 081-06. e I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action" Re Feswnd: Approve ref soWtvislon map, conceptual gra ng 'p aft,, conceptual `�yQtdscape plan and issuance of Negative Wlaratio". 8. Pr-oJect Densiliz, 6.05 dwelling units" per acre' 4r Sur-roundin 1a ntJ D§e and Zgn cir,,q: North ur hs_ ruction; Victoria Plan n Community South - Approved Tract 13280, Victoriat Planned C- .unit{ East - Proposed Tract 13281; Vt7pria Planned oim I t`j+ W,�t - Vacant land; Victoria Planned Community D. 1e eral Flan Dev4WItions4 pro ne'- = 1ow --P"d1 a sity Re idantia (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) - North Low - Medium Density Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) South -' Low- MediumcDensity Resid -tntial (4 -8 dwelling units per acne) Q East Loif- Medium Density Residential (4 -8 dwelling units peh acre) 1, 1- Mai Den 'tity ~'Residential „94 -8 dwelling units per o � rE r. r fir €E.t i PLANNING COMISSITOM STAFF REPORT TT 13753 - William Lyon Co. rr January 27, 1583 Page 2 _ E. Site Characteristics: The site Is''proseritly vacant ;with a na ra s ope ram north to so0h ?Iae project J,vill be brand by -the $elvine Loop Road to tba sa i, Kfinyosi Way to the east, Southern Pacific Railroad to the .,th and a 20 acre parcel to tWwest inteciled for.future r . - family residential„ deYelopment. 11. BACKGROUND: On August 12, 1987 the Planning Commission approved a revise -- ricturia Vineyards' South" Area Development Plan which the land established , use ,,designart�� i4. road augments and parr locations. Subsequently, tin Planning Commission approved Pkmel Map 9350 which established tw large parcels_ >for future tract development, and dedicated strett right -of -way for the arterial snd collector `,Rtretts. The applicant is now proposing to subdivide Pavicel i fito lots, for future single-family prototype development and to est.lblish "pedestrian. «railsr and street circulation- within, he tract. III. ANALYSIS A. GeOral: For this subdivision the applicant proposes a <. i i %Q'IlTy rectangular lot, variations of a 50 foot by 100 food dimenrtan, with a minima lot size. of 5,000 souara feet, the ' largest, lot „bein 12,000 square feet artd an average lot size of 6,7,50 attire feet. The featured pro uct prototype''is a seater family home. by the °Wctoria plot sfe,41e As squired Commrunity Plan, the quota of on -site recreational vehicle parking of 25% of the total lots will be provided on at least 33 rats by utilizing An.expaoded side yard (10 foot mini l..: Lot 130 is a 20 acre parcel established by this subdivisiwn that is intended for future developaint within the�Medium and Medium - High residential densities. S. Traails Advise_ry_;_ CommitteA� The T'rai'ls Advisory .Committee reviewed pis —p' o3ect an December 16 1987 for the purpose of reviewing the trail connections with ;n the Vineyards planning area with regard to this tract. The Committee recommended two trail connections from the ends of Street V and Street "F” to the future Community trail proposed along the southern Ftacific Railroad right -of -way (See Exhibit V ) . The 0041 end are to . be fenced with wroilght -iron until such time as the re4iona trail becomes usable. ' C. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Coleman, ; Eserl; , 'tolsf',y viewed the project an December 37, 1937" and recamaended approval as submitted by the applicant. However,, the Committee did have some general con "rns with respect to `\ the trail connections leading up to the railroad right -df-way and requested that this issue be discussei;5by the Planning Co"issi on. " 62 PU! ING COMISS$Ok STAFF REPORT TT 13753— William iy,� �Co. i Januart 27, 1 ' s = o Page 8 l i D, Technical Review CO*ittee: the Comiitee reviewed the project � a w special conditions and recomendad s.tand:% conditions of approyyrr��1, the project is consistent with all apP3icable standards gnd�isrdinances. a E. Envi"Oneental Asses$wt: Part I of the Initi'�,t �twy has been coup Ay the app"pplicaft. Staff has coepUtid t aI of the Envirp. _ tal Checklist grid found no sighifican� watts on the enviromo as a neS9t of this project FOR FI IMS: This project is cC4.jstent with the Victoria lFlanned tin and the Genera�i Plan,°and will not be,4etriaeentai / to adjacent properties, or Ga .,.•e significant adverse JppActs. . proposed use together with all recommended conditions of a"F6'1 is in compliance with applicable regutat'ons of the Deveiopltalt 'C Code and the Victoria Comnitf Plan.,. V. CrARESPONDE : .,This item has been advertUad in The, Dai IX Report :newspaper as, a public hearing, ;fie property posrAia, and o, ces were .sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project G site. - '_ ",I- RECOtNDAT201l: Staff rcoMaends that the Plaknning Comission approve Ten ve Tract 15753 subject to the" corditiors of approval, throw adoption of the attcch*d Resolution and issuance of a hegatire DocItOation. 14( Re_ u1ly it c 7_ Be ler ~ ; City tanner Attac*nts:: Exhibit "A" Site-ot -it fxattbn ta}a ExHbit "a" - Site Plan trxhiblt "C" - Product PrototyEfe �; Exhibit "O" - Concep" 'at Whdstaps Exhibit "£" - Gonce -.ual Grulding,:Plan Resolution of Approval s Conditions 0 Q C1 dd I� 1, c.. 1 ° ,NOM F.XHIBrr.. SCAM 1pr +awmnse �e -w Y •�yF'f� rm�rwyvq•,e. �t�'::'�''t� a �=. _ T I 4 rJ NORM riw to 155 PLANNING DWMN EXHIMTI-Jo—� SCALE- l�DCYiidlY+fR.Otl�pS' � 1 _� kM1111S1�MtMWn . fro�hTwcoa►�wrt 3 � , o Ar two 0 . (�xa ark •.c� � rt(� 41 � " 4 M In IN 61[ ,� . -Alt. rN J. a • a. �1 o= '�, -i�i�� � • .lei, ` {- s - "1 ji '54. IMF l �' � >> F x..1110 = fir ME, tmire AUk �fimc� ity" wv t w'µ11• k;L' erg tR.ra k 1 t) • 1 a}t 'ARM GSK ". `,�� r ��� 1, f V TYMAL •iFT W -A---A- SWUM. - n 'y i olom "W a yaw RF M✓f Vw.SV� �,.�r 1 r. TY�j11s.#CI�QlJ'� '3 - , ioc•a�R +aASee. yrR�y —16. MM µms. •� J .::. TYPfCAt, IS Nili - STUO Aft, CITY OF J` �i. ` ,:� �orcRn�aiet+a+�na►,a�cr+w» , - ►r A F MANNING ' v QM $CALE, ?i r r n U REs&UTION wo. U ° A RE$6L01011 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION iii THE CITY O ' RAN00 ,'CUCAMONGA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 'V. 13753. A RESIDENTIAL SURD YISION OF 45.89 ACRES OF LANii INTO 120.19 ACRE LOT IN �� MEDIUM (8 -14 DREL1,1K UNITS i PER ACRZ� AND MEDIUM- HIGH" (((t4 -C4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) j _} OraTRICTS AND 129, SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON= 25.29 AM IN THE tOW DIES (4-9 DWELLING PNITS PER ACRE) DISTRICT WITHIN _kE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY LOCATED . AT THE �SE NOR110ST IMMER OF E` E LINE ROAD AND MILLIKEN AVENUE , APK: 2217 - 08146.E A. Recitals. F` (1) The idi'tliam Lyon Co. hay' filed' In epplication for.`thet 46roval of 'Tentative Tract Map No. 13753 described in the title, of this 4. Resolution. Hereinafter in SrOz, Resolution, the subject Tentative 'Cract M&P request is referred to as !the application"... j \1 (Ii) On'tl* 27th of January, 1986, the planning Coamissian of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a daly i. ticed public, .bearin an the application and concluded said ivaring an that g J t (iii) All legal prtrequisites to the adaptjortr of this Resolution have occurred. lk 7 lE�. Resolution." ,. NOW4 THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolvf by the 'Planning Commission of t\� City of Rancho Cucamonga as fallowat 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts sat forth in the Recitals, Part'A, of this °Resoluttion are t* and correct. .2. Rased upon substantial evidence preserved tow.,this Commission during the above- referenced publs; hearing on January 27,, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, �ogetMr � #th public testimony, this. Commission hereby specifically finds d follows; E � - 4a) The applica ",_4,A applIen to propeyli* located, at the northeast corner 2f Base Lire Roan and Mi rliken Avenwwhich is an irregularly shaped percel with i.78R feet frontfng Base Fine Road *,W 1230 feet, fronting Milliken Avenue and is presently uninroved; and ` (b) The- propari$ 'o the nortiC4— the subject site i s 4t, the property to the south of that cite cone j sts -tf vacant, the propif ty the east is vacant, Anq, the property to t'ne _.wet , is. vacant:, (e� The sUbdivisidn propoasa 5 #O� s4uar�e ; °foot m��nia � 16t. Residential 70 square riot average) which ik consistent with the Loat.��f4uh . " l % , y PLAN EW 60MISSIt,R RESOLUTION RO.. 1'T 13753 - William Lyon` . January 27, 1988 Page ^� 3 11 3. Based upon` the° substantial evidence prase this Coqlmission- during the above referenced public hearing, and upan the spec�ifiic findings of facts set forth in par�.jraph 1 and 2 above, this Co ,sion- hereby find and concludes as follews: �. (a) 'chat tentative tract is consistent *It }► the General Plan, Development Cede, 'ItA splific plans; and The dcsign. or imprcvements of', the tentative. tract is consistent witt, ' he tencral Plano D+K,elo ,t Coe, '4nd spec,,ifie plans; and (c) The s r`'is physically suitable for the type op;� developatenL.pra ,3sed; , d ') (d) desigi!! of the subdivisior}.,is not likely to cause substAntiaT' �snvi.onnAfal d yt _ ,� � and , 5 avoidabae injury ,to h�Aans ; axW ' wIIO i -e or r: ,,their habifat,`an� te? The , tentative tract is t likely to cause �i r serious, public he�tith: proh'le�s; atsd r'fi} The sign of the tent�,ivi uIll rot i� conflict Wi l - 't:ny - eas nt�- Owehuithod , h kte public at 7ak ^.ge, now of record,_ for access . J through A)r u of, the propertjr within the C J pkoposed subdivisiohE r 1 7� 4 , this Coam.ssion hereby itnA"nd certi fps 'that -the ptojec ,tis been revl3' d and conside�d in compl�ence with 1e.Cali for s'ia Cnvtro q�tal Qualityf t of 197x1 aru} f�trt#ser, itsi5 Co issit►n t;*=rebr issues- a Neyatiive j Decl'ardtiun. S. 9aied upon the, fiAding> and conzlusfiihs set fort�lin paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this C"issiot! hereby appreveil`the appliv'fion subject to each and every condition . set ftsrth . below and in tix attached Standard; f Conditions attachedAereto -acid incorporated herein 4;t tMs r�ferance 11 ! � - (1) Prior to the r(.acordation ��of Tract i3yra3;� Parcel )lap 930 > shall be reco dad t2➢ Thts is bl 1�. 1n9�ye as a Tract. 5tdivision _sn}y. t t Any future ;pro losals Wr :the deVe 4103 r,esideitial a hs shallt,; requ re t� lt��ri�r�✓�ls?� oval prior to the, nuance of:build ng s for ty ;zni s. } �it, �y� }C yj�..�# �O}gj�.�y� t:1Tq(t`` ��:q.. tJ Q .fi �:• P Rt11� 11�i F6�F 1Vt{ ilGr+7V1�fAi dVt� NO. - T'i 13753 - Willift !,yon Co. January 27, 1998 - Page 3 (31,: The tiillliam Lyon ` cat�aan�r shi�l 3itba�it a disclosure st$t wit for this traCfr fA, be '_ viewed_ zhnd approved by the, City t�a,�ner prior . #a Distribution prosper ±five `= dai- Vopgrs of this tras'b. ,,'clue dIsaiosuiv, sca nt �har;� , include )cite city of Ranoho cccaarcsn" "s, onditiM re, A0,-t cats, ,:acrd expectat ions for devtlopiment Standard.'' and pt odu. types for ibis 'tract t.43 Laxdrtaape traaf nts at e end 0 the} side4u cul- de -cacs D -� shal be designed- to �ruvide ` "An 'open view intar;%the f in, Lqr of the trul' -de -Sac. (4 7hs fanci ng��all s 4*eoui red for the tract shall he consistent, With the ncing/Walls indjcm�ted ass fa conceptual ' landscalAng , pUm. public; vim shall . be treated with.s�*in, = rliaLor *.,water ` {fen;t';►g H sediont. , fencing corner side yards a rm 1u6►y , Ahe Belvi� * Loop R shall W detor4tive hlo�k_ (6) Prior to occupan4 of more '�"� "�� p�r�ent: of W , un% y within the tract, the p4c -trt m tr�t!+� -shall be unproved � Mth sidealks, l noscapin A irri ation, and Lighting.` plans are-to reviewed and approved by the t:ity 4 Planner and the Eigineer prior, !i #0 issuznce of , building plemit; _. u , (7) y r tamin um g Wails �►sed i�*,`U be a maxim ofjooir feet , high« s ; (S) All retaining cults viiible to ne the .general public -, A e., i on the Weet side. of 0rner side `yard$, and ?actWn c067 j fron -yard, are U� 4e constructed pf� a decorative "r terial F to the satisfaction of the city ylanner.�` f (91 All back of zat grade diff+ereatat5 are to be a maxim of r 12 feett v j (IQ) an -site re"attom-1 vehicle't ;Fpa>; nq shall be, � tided 01; ( ' at .least 3S,- uts by utilizing an iipaolid siie rank (� feet rntibim!Gmei'. L' , (111) concurrent `with any application for Devi j Rev}t: , p`iicaO shell also submit err atoustis i ud 4tailiTLg „� . rat m!W,)tiaan wsueez, if any, are <� tluired to ieve J" .< noise leveWsr troth +nxterts� and interior,, can ,stao� with icy for - Standards lots.abi tting either @!jj!I er, l Baste Lino Rozd. ' 0 �� e d Engim in -Div U) 7ct0 60 vi?ao�?at r,et (existanu2st) mall be . ��. o Cgn4tr�l full '1i�d h� "�.C`i'c° pt that kM%i .1A�' Yi ° � ieprova nts` xaay be d ferme 'until Oevelopatent Of the y� c ad,iacent property . r f% 71 it 13753 - Villian Lyon Cow ar January 27, 1988 Page a {2) Base Line road shall be constructed from Milliken Avenue " to Rochester Avenue as follow%; a. pull width for,the north roadbed; 0 b. full,.oadian island including landscaping= c« Minims 26' ►fide pavement for the south roadbed; and d. the de eThper' way request aE ralsbursement a' i t to r� :doer' the 'c, 5t of one -teal f >z'f the, , median i sl and and the additional 151 wide pave�ent "fS r the south roadbed from feature :develo nt "$s it occurs an the south side of Barse,L,ine Road. (3)_ The storm drain. system shall be constructed lh Dase:E.ine Road from Milliken Avenue to -- Day Creo Ct; �hnel to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior,, to occupancy of h aAy tsuil�'`_�t Col The existing overhead utilities (talecowitonicatiod` and- electrical, 1 ' electrical, except for the 66KV electrical) o'n the project side' of Deese Line Road, shall be undergeounded from the first pole on the west side of Milliken Avenue to the first pole on the east side of Rochester Avenue,prlor to pubTtd iOravement accopiance or occupancy, `Wcheier occursjik t, The developer y request .a reimbursement agreemdirt 'I,,to recova�r .one- ailf the, City adopted cost for undergrouneing fro ''future development iredevelopment � as t it agars on to opposite side of Ute strdW 1 ,r, (61, The existing 6f,6 ,n lactricrl poles on the.. project. -Sf4i of Base tine RoaO frew to first pole:,on rile Est side of Milliken Avenue `to eke'„ first pole on t14 .past ,side of Rochester Avenue Shall ;t, relocated to a mjnimu clear distance of tetr,(10) feek from the ultimate Crab face face and shall be Sho=v on t* ST/Lt' improvement plans. addition, the existing pole jVjj 1 be replac .�tith whit; or bleached poles. t6l A17 pubRic- impr'4ements imluding, but tort - 11iito4 to,, sidewalk% ::`.street igtts, taturseaping and -the Access curb t4 the p6iciflect°::,. —pal shall be- subject to the approval of ^ the City Bn�#neer t and City- Planner. Additional .landscape easements `.W regotrad alonj Bass , n ' Line .R"d ti tappropri atel 1 '�s� a this street fronta ditg to ;;the plasd ng= 14Ut, ons ge " •.wader and around try ralicatia utility polls. All public i4rot ent P.M"S including lAndszapio 7 shall` be reviewed And approved � t�h.',e;.Ciiy £riginee; end City Planning prior to' rewardution they- final,map u. - AL IN Cif ISSIQ4 &£SOE,tti Adt _ � '# x: " _..R January 27,, 1. 3 f l=oge S (7) The prAJect is to again to the currentIl ;Ipi � �tYAYet1 nay , ' Creek' Charnel, therefore no, canstr= ij, ft;�til Ing 'or q atsiiaag Y i'Fs shall be isstrsd until asa II'cof that Dq Greek Chin-VI 4*prov Wpro4,#ct '3at1S r 4an5trtaa*tittn. (g) Kenyan way Shaul constructed full W44th from Bel vi r,A Read a f t ?, ing - VSautharn pacific P. . rca d crossing , t pt tat: ofi` «t tc side at7ks and landscaping; io— y, _,be 4forred until .devela t�tx „af t adjacent preapa V4 6. The Deputy, s�r��ixry to ANS Cut>oisstba 5 cgrtitir a�dopiw of Chia Resoutian' y� APP ROM yayO 40no-wS y+}yH w•�., y l •y r i PLAMIt NG OF, 'i11 CJTY OF . $O CUC '<ynNigl4 a. arry pi stn ...,.,..�,,» I� Sam``' Buller Po wq- WIrezary of the planning Cowssiutr' of the City of Rattcir$ }�acaaaastya, 'do tereby,tvtlfy' that tta foregoing itml�ation WAS d y and ri1 regularly introdacarnf, passtp and acp;ted by the Plactnitig'isstan € the � Pi of gatciio cuc "a�;' at a' regola� *Qting of ,the pl*6;110'i4 Ca issia held 4th the 27th ai:'y of 3a � ta" , g $t by the folvtWing vote" »to -wits AYES: CG lISSIW s WES ISSI4Ii 4: i) : r,- > Ct1Fto1ISSSIONERsw P, S Si .q z f� s __.. P � t_ '. - � .. 'i, � -.' `' (&i•- cad - i; -t O r w `i' 4' aqY r, �` r \ N Q Y w Y OtiL -XI 81 s xs k fly Nall IS S ap �b- y _ _ ;s,... Y 1 e N �a }mss _i'YyY'!!� Uh . ��n y� .�`f �+�Y•gai _ N _bY�L GYQ 7.% �.� L � _. INN P N N Y V v Y zm us 9F _M M �S M iVlVTaa at lit. 96®_ y N 1 �y y� i H \ 11 � ��� ����� p� Mks �Y.•�v�� $,a� ��� � ��° , AS mA IT lilt ;W _« ''A $ + =3i AA ill �� Y', Nj, �A an CI L fib.. �.a IV a I Yf Alm r NEW is tis s N� A �g3u Sa y w - Y Y /� N �r� gel I,� ..,; 3g Ls S sib' , si g— yak TF ml xt -r •�- Baa• wery ma s_+ Na his" a `.j lti'm ® 4 „ mp-" g +• : o iF r y �u k gall N ,•Y i'1 My aaV u1�E N�I ^°MM QVly is — � iL t? ilk =- j� i w u'�121 rL .. Sub? all] N W KM 4WD •C sat ♦C4^.n e S± 3 r %y Y• M ell! as St wY L N ►N Ala —0 U11T Ali ge W M 47 sit f i �n„•` ry y 1 � e S± 3 r %y Y• M ell! as St wY L N ►N Ala —0 U11T Ali ge W M 47 m ew Y N J b� all r I -Mai Lip' g _ u Y q t 'M tWay 16 yNui rr. w� /. . }yyy � a'��F,• =� Yx�� rMQ it ���(�j�,�� 11 ISLE" 2 ^:.` SIN si 22H s Po lei d y �' � � qq Sr •kY 1 23 " • y a i Ytl, • qeM A eg- _ Ky�- 1zH x'� . Nltu w haw. C F w E9 '`0 T {r ■L` Wa.l L ti .J 0. 1 + 1 J O �w M� I�K aj Ci ,., A N� ,.� I ;j w g ' SH y YV� rY Jr, 761 ,':�, k 5t �.` �' y._. A�+►`�f �,,�Y 'iii Aii Q � Ali 1"Y �`cYi� •"P"'�.. ~��� a,. e.r � a�40 1'jl �I „�i� I7 ar u �yyyy. 1 ■� M \. yg� R x r ,':�, k 5t �.` �' y._. A�+►`�f �,,�Y 'iii Aii Q � Ali 1"Y �`cYi� •"P"'�.. ~��� a,. e.r � a�40 1'jl �I „�i� I7 ar 0701 -02 1,27 -88 PC Agenda o 4-of 6 t: R1 -^_�iY y. �'6k�TT V�. T' VO y_ ._ ��_�►_ .. _. : r _��`iii���t _ _ _- _ bV U4 Sal j it 7i „ r #.. " ;,_ ZZ zRiz 11 lit a ; PST �, x ja r as Ali! Y 3w � a_s Si`T ae$ YS iF'�Y� .. g. V} 6 s S N i Y gi ILI P 0 uT 41 aC M O H �s� 'E. M ✓b �VM '.l ♦^ 171 i ww t 4� .. 11- or— PV $ a3 a� as it p b C� r �+ 31- .. L..` Q` ss` 1 v « j, 21 �u;ti i ice. his y �M liar, !p a mays ; 11 + =r.T �w �; = b ita- A w r ail J., CIC i ^° j- 94M al Ell N Is a AZZ r. y4 -N aki r N � ' c~i i. qg ads � 'sy, • ,i` N ; {�. a {e. y �`« R az I A N Art t i+0 A� �� � ♦ CC���� ��4 f'O�yG sit /eRM M(W jam W_�w. nw M,$ Y� Cif OF RANCHO CUCAMONGP+ STAFF REPORT, :) 1, z l i VATE January 27, '19881. Chairman and Viers of the PlanilinfcoWssion PROM Brad Buller, Cif Planner ~ BY: Debra Eleigr Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIROMMENTAi, ASSESSMENT AND - TENTATIVE TRACT 13281 WILL W. - A MlOntlal MObdiviSltln - � W acres of a n'd 206 single- family lots and a B acre a park site An the Yf�ditae Residential Wstr%t „(8.14 dwelling unity per acre) wfth3.n the Victoria Planned COWftity, located ati the M st corner of Base Line Road and Rochestar Avenue - AP* 227481 -06. It I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION's ., A. Action Requested: Approvat df stbdivis on map -- conceptual, gra n�" a F ©nceptual lan+iscape plan: and ,nuance of Negati�e.Declaration: \1 B. Project Density: 7.40 dwelling milt per,., acre f C. Surrounding Land Use and ,24nirg_ Env- - i' 1�;'us40 cow ruction; Victoria Planned r' Com�aunity `',;� South r Vacant land; Terrx Vista Planned Com4nit;r East - ,Existing lumber ;yard and vacant land; Medium'Density Residential (8 - -14 duelling units per acre) West :Approved Tract 13280 and pronpsed Tract 13753; Victoria PlrAnned Coma unity ,v ; D. General' Plant Designations roaec ' Size - Low- ealum Densii Residential (4 -8 Willing yni is p er ache � North - Lw Ne'.a x Density Resido -Hal (4 -8 dwelling unit �._ por arre) South Low- hedi(x Density Residents@ ;.44 -8 dwelling unfits per acre) East Medium Density Residential i8 -14 dweeliing Units Per , acre }.` West Low- Medium Density Residential (4 -8 dwelling units pe'r acre) TE PLMNIMC C0MMISSION Si)tF'F REPORT TT 13283 - William Lyon Co. c, ` January 27, 1988 Page 2 ' E. Site Character zticsao The site is presently vacant with a rte ra s opa,. rdAl north to south, The project will `tee found by ti 'Ur* Road "to. the south, 'Rochester Avenui„to the ;41st, Southern, Pasifia, Ra�lfroad right-of - W to the ansrth, ; rith r< ' kenyon Way and Belvino Loop Road to „ he* wean II. BACKGROUND: on A!igust 12, 1387 the Planning towollj%sion Q+pproYtd a revised- ctoria Vineyards SoutKl Aa development Plan which =road alignments established the Iand use, desrignation'1, and p& rbcatiahs,, Subsequently, 'the Plarinino Coeais %lon appro ved parcel gap 9360 which established the lartc, parcels for future tract development, :and "dedicated stoat right -of -vKy for_�ft arterfal and collector streets. The, applicant is how proposing to subdivide Parcel 3 into lots for future single f0ily prototype development and to. establish psdesitrian trans and street M Culation twithin that tract. 111. AMALYSIgt A. General: For the subdivision, the applicant proposes the widij� ' s a ow lot concept using variatipns of a :50 foot by 89 fo f lot dimension. The lot 3,000 feet, twl mi1�i siii�'As agvare largest lot bung 7,00p scfeet and an avoragd lot size o 3,800 square few The featured product prototyph'is a tente� plat single family home utilizing a wide alosign,with a recessed narage._ house Victoria Community Plan Text requires thAt recreatti` nat vehicle parking -must be-provided for 26% of the total lotd either through a space available on the lot or, in Art off-site facility. For this tract, the appliatrt is proposing recreations vehicle parking by ;providing atocesas hraugh the "#szsk garage to them+ star ,surd. This, sa ution ii'1kr to 00t proposed for Tract, 1344Y. At thC-1 time that nis a6roved,., 3tdly 22 1987, the Commissio6 deters ified than tW_driv+e -thru garage access ,should be used for only 15 an site vehicle pnri�ing with s an additional 10% of the., required sjt�ra�ge prnvided in an off- site facility. The same regreatienal rehicl* storage ratio' hasc rj been applied to this tract:' however, the additional 10% can also be acco"lished through using the expanded, -10 ,foot Minimum, side yard :areal, - ' The front yard landscaping k.�Ancluded as a condition of n apprgv4l for this, >tradt. The Commi'ssion's policy; is,to require f�-ant yard landscaping ptovided by the developer on s0divisipns with lot averages, f 4, 00 square feet :or lens, the average ut size fir Trac, � 281 is : 80Q square feet. �' �` a q PLANNING CtiF1MISSIOU STAFF REPORT� TT 13281 - William Lyon Co. u. January 27, 195 Page 3 " F d='Trails Advisor 'Committee: -The Committee reviewed this project on ove ar a connections, lotthin the Vineyards n ling area v. -ith ing " trail for the r se of " rev th regard is 1 this tract. "the Comittee recommended that a ,trail connection be provided at '`the northeast: corner, of the tract to provide access to Rochester Avenua 44d the future Regional Trail System. That trail cone 41on is ,.shaven on the revised subdivision, reap, accessi :.Jchester tvenue between lots 192 and 195, C. Desi n Reviews Cormii4e' The Committee (Uerick, Mi Istoy, a exon ) act an -De: ember 3, 1987.Y� At that' time the site design included two sway intersection's, that were viewed as undesirable by the "fie ittee with addition&1) traffic safety factors that the Engfnearing Pivision' expressed, as undesirable within residential neighborhoods. With that` input the applicant has redesigned the site The Resign' Revie14 Comitte &;.;reco►mmended approval of the r^,Pi )d site plan on Ja'tu 'ry C, 1968. - D. 'technical Review Committee: =-, The Committee reviewed the, ,prr an a ermin'ev ciit w fit �peciai conditions and recnarW4,^yz standard conditions of approval, the project is consistent with all appTicable Standards and ordinances. E. Enviroomental Assesswgt* Part I of the Initia� Study has, been does} e e y app can — 'Staff has-completed fart 11 of the Enmiro» mental C xklist end t`oudd no significant impacts on the .environment as a ksul.t of this project. IV. FACTS FOR Jt- ^INtaiNGS: The project is consistent with the Victoria Plannesr javmwu ni'iy and the General Plan, and will -not be 4etrimental to adjacent properties, or cause significant adverse impacts. The proposed usq together w'ith.aslI recommended conditions of approval is to compliance with applicable regulations of the Development Code and the Yfctoria Cowunity Plan. V. CORRESPON-UNCE., This item has been advertised irk The Daily Report newspaper a a; public hearing, the site posted F and n notices were sent to all property owner - 13thin 300 feet of the project site. V. RECDPWNDATION: Staff 'iecJ rids that the Planning Commission approve, Tentative Tract 13281, subject to the conditions of approval, through adoption of the attached Resolution aid issuance of a Negative Declaration. _p ;, �" � ��� oiSA r�t� z9� +b'. o.k � +� +. m x w ,p .c�w.t�"•n.� �� Mimi. IF x 1C• 1--� sip `�' �+ `" _ ! • . y� � wLM �w fir•'~ h11 r Yeti �. M�RiM�.w 1�1�1. "�_ a'S �' i rar.. .fix =14e �.. `. �•„ � T _ �` _ .� w,+1l, 1r +►'' �@' r�'+ a '*'16"'�}A7'ts't'.w±+rR'�wb°�a� '� � � � esy �+�•' -ter � "^ "t�•.�. -+ter �4la�TIIbZ �... NKLMIq[rlpl {2^TT � "' _ - :. - - -- -- .. •� I CITY RANCM CWAMONGA Tr Adz PLANNING D lr'SC.IP+T EXHIBrrt JNt �A `.�,. Ir `J s. 9NWT MAN � ! �G I �I f �I { I F NORTH RANCHO CUCAMOWA TOM zr PA "MANNING DWEM to _.. � I I 0 9N it NY. . all �� x ••, Sam*, VJK i ♦ out '4 { {ft rs �s `J s. 9NWT MAN � ! �G I �I f �I { I F NORTH RANCHO CUCAMOWA TOM zr PA "MANNING DWEM to _.. �y SPAI. f m in ,a wr xa ' yr a se da AD in Wo . it =$NMI y >I IFii't! Ali F t i l ow Iry PLANNhNG IV j-11 EXHIBIT: = JJ� n r.*IAIT lam ttOeRA (+.now. u t j i i mlrll� no" CJ IF ya TYPpt v -'8 nr�a eawom�.nflsxwa� Ajr r C1 Mn'y _ l+•` .IMF �aM•W��. }i �:. YZVf�R L av Mn� TvFrAL sla i m * T.'C s _rte TYPICAL Sl 8i1TtN. STNBET #41tIlYm WAY NOM cr - ;- iaitoasut�G�o+aot mei awr <: s f.r R L1 ..._ MOM= N0, A RESOLUTT -Ow OF 7HE PLOOING COMISSION wt THE CITY ADf RANCHO CUCMONCA AOROVING TENTATIVE TFAT ` ttAP till. 13281. A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIYi ilgii Ri• 32.136 ACRES tSF LANG INTO 206 SIM.E FARILY LOTC . �. A 6 ACRE PARS SITE in THE P fiYbl►3 RESIDENTIAL DISTRIi 14 DWELLING. UNITS PER ACRD WITHIN THE; VICTORIA ; PLANNED CoMd RITY.- LOCATED A THE NORTHWEST CORNER V , BASE LINE ROAa ANO i ocHtesTER AVENM - APN; 227- 0%1 -06 A. ReCalsq I I, M The WiM Lyon.CO. has filed an application fovr,Abe approval, Of Tentative Tract -.t 44. 13281 as eescribed in the title of this. 4; R €solutiom Hereinaf:.or in }riffs Resolu�,fon,:tae ntrbject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as ".the application ". M) On the 271h of January, 19.8$,• fi, � Planningl Commission of the Ci ty of Rancho Cucaargnga coridu god a duly r4ticed . public hearing on the application and Concluded said hearing on that date, -� legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Rescilmtt1� have occurred. s.r B. Resolution. POW, THEPEFORE, t t is bereby found, det",. i red and resolved?' by the Planning CoRnissfen of the City of ilarnflio Cucw, nga as fO` Iowsl 1. This Comismlon !terstby sp.ifically finds th'it ail of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part{ . 4f th's Resolution ark tx ue and correct, '.; Based upon . subsik Jence pt.t ' ed to thi s Comissi on during the ab�sve- referenced 014 „r�Ag `O 3anuary 27, 2988, iociuding, , written and oral staff r�`Po4^fs, ' gather.:, ,:pith public testimony, _ this COMission hereby specifically` finds (a) The application dpplies to property located at tine northwest corer of Base Line koad and Rochester Avenue w#rtch is an if- regularly shaped parcel with 1867 feet ,frcnt ng Base Line Road and *176 feet fronting ftchestei= Mvinm- Znd is rrtsE�7kdw unilyproved* and ib? '''o Property *4 the north of the sub3ect site is vacant, the property to the sbcth of that site consists of vacant, the property to the east is an existing.`" der yard, and the property to the west is vacant: 3< 800d upon the substah�4i�t evide;rce presented to this Cc�aaission during the above - referenced public heajL�inn E"nd upon the specific findings of ` pacts set forth in parAgtrapt� I and 2 {roue= this romission Wltby finds a',W �, ;• �s�:.;.lt�des �� �tS�it� X05: X71 PLANNING OMISSION RCSDLU'fIDN NO. TT 13281 - William Lyon Co. � January 27,:1988 Page 2 (a} that - tentatIve' tract is rpnxistEr' with the General Plan, Develu nt,-;;ode, and specific plans, and ibi The des%p -or lwprovements of the tentative tracts insistent wi the General Plsn, Aevreloparwo-�o4a, and specific plans; and to =..the site'is physically suitable for 'cCrs type of ;> y developpent proposed, U (d) The design �df the subdivistaft is not likely to cause, 'substantial dm 9e, And ;/ avoidable, injury to humans adi wildlifc'•uor,, their habivtat; and -(A) The tentative tract „is, ,hot likely to cause ,.sorious public bent{, "- Problems; and f The desigsa of thel ientitive tract will net conflict with a* easement acquf med by the public at large, =,nw of records: for access: °. through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision, l 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compli4fte witlm the California Enviroiiental k, Quality kt or 1970-- and, further, this Commission hereby: issves a Negative i Declaration. E S. Based vpdti.t�u findings. and conclusions set forth in paragraph 2, 2 and 3 moves this Commission hereby approves the application sa4ject to ` each And Wry" condition .set forth below and, in the attached. Standard Condit:ans a, ached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division dit Rrinr to eh;o racordatinn. of Tract 13291 - Pareal Mas`a35i1. Shall be recoried: - -- - (C) This is being approved as a Tract Subdivision only.,.,. Any, futupre proposals for the deve of *F —of-'�ve or more residential units shall require DEs gn Review` approval prior to the issuance of building permits for arty utits., (3) The iiillias Lyon Company, shall ,�utmit a disc d,,4YV statement for this traact to be revlenkd arid' approved ,by the City Planner prior. to distrOutipw to prO tive 6 developers of this tract. 'Ti a discloyur statecient shal i „~ „ include, the Cite of Rancno` Cucamongs's cond�tior�s, requireients, and expectations fv, development standaeds> " t and product types for this tract, r^_"r p4 consis�,ent 'Stith t" fencingpwails inriicated on th@� concoptl.�il landscaping plan. mood fencing exposed toy public yiew shal be treatte-vi `h stain, ,paint or "crater sealant;,. F °ring on corner side yards and fencing along the Sol 1o_ :cop Road shat -I be decorative block. (5) "Pvior to, occt(06cy of more than 50 percent of., the units within.tl* tract, the pedestrIlan.trail.e, shall be improved with ; siQwalks, landscaping, irrigation, and Lighting. The planil are to be reviewed land approved by the City Planter and the City E��r�eer�- prior to the issuance of building p" twits. -` (6) Arty retainln§g walls used, are to maximum of four feet cif All retainitag `wails vislywA tg general pukTic,: i.e., opt the strAl � -side ,'rorneP side yards and within ?ft, front yard, ,Ire to-! 6 constructed of a decorative mater`fai to the say `s n: 0 the City Planncr. (8) All back of 'fot g�'ar% differentials are to be a maxipetat of 12 feet. (9) Concurrent; kith any appication for Design Review, the applicant shall also submit an acoustical study detailing: what msi�igation measures, *f aqy, are required to achieve noise levels, both axtrw.io►?'.and inierioi°,� \conristont with City Standards for lots' abaft ng either �b sie tine Road, Rochester .Avlanpro. 1 (10) Recreational Venicle Stowage shall be provided based on the fol;owin,: a. Fiftnen percent of <„the requared�,� storage shay[ be providel qn individuail lots-Ihraou!gh the use of drive tNroygh garages. b. -Teo percent of the regsuirad storage shall De par Wvid,_-d in an aff -�Jte facility. En t )nt'ifl division: (i) Thd _entift,' Dales o, Street (east and crest) shall be constructed'. full width except that off -site sidewalks and parkway lan�scapirg on thd',upp6�ite side of the street may , be deferred; �V' ntil develowcnt cf the adjacent property. - '' Base Line Road shalt be constructed from Milliken Avende to Rochest", Avenue�as : .follows: Full vaIdth for the north roadbed, including sidewalk tr , and p#kway landscaping adjacent to the devela :nt; PLmwIh�i,Cwh lsSI Ri 5OLiiTIOk NO. r, - n January -13281 _ Vf l uO Leon Co. 27, 1988 Page 4 a�{ b. Fall median island including landscaping; c. Minimun.,26' pavement for the aor.th roadbed; Olnd d. cast of one -haif of the median island and the additional 261, wi& pavement for the south roadbed shall be subject to retmbursement'frea tyre ad;iacent property owner upon that property's'dsvelopment� (3) Occupancy Permits shall nvt be issued for any buildings, `l except model homes, until the completion of Phase ii of the Day Creek Ctranrtel. (4) The stgr* drawn system shah be constructed in Base Line ._ Road from Milliken Av�lue to Day Creek Channel 0 the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to occupancy of Any buildings. (``e: Toe .fisting overhead utilities (telecommunications and . electrical except for the 66KVY eiettricaY) on the project side of Base Litre Road shall. De- underj*ounded from the.- first pole<:,on the west ide of Fii,l1 .ken Avenue tci the -on first pole the; eaast..side of hoehest'r Avenue, prior to public improvement acceptance or o.cupancy, whichever occurs firc,t* The DRveloper may, re�4.ast tic ea r.. as c::ant agreement to recover .one -half„ the City a0ated cost for unciergrounding from future Ovelcpment (rgdeVEla;oenty as it occurs on :he opposite 15'& of tht, s, met..- (6) The existing, 66KY electrical poles ton ((the project o; i of Base Line Road fray the first pole n;5 the west ' side of Milliken Avenue to the first pole on the east side of Rochester Avenue i!kall y`t relocated to a minimum clear distance of ten (.10) feet: ficim the ultimate curb face and shall be shown on the Street Improvement Plan. ('`) All public improvements including, but not limited to: sidewalks, street- °:Fghts, landscaping, and the access curb to the 66 KY electrical poles shali be subject to the ' approval of the City; Engineer and City Planner. Additional landscape -�aas eats or reduction in the total n " number of lots may be required along Base Line Road .:to ° appropHately landscape this street €roitage due to the r planting limitations , -under and around the relocated _ utility poles. All public improvement plans including landscapinq Shall be reviewed- and approved by the - City „ Engineer anal City Pi sner prior to rer°+- ,Or +'on of the, final V1. (8) The pro e.t is to drain'' o the,,, currently un mproved Day Creek annel d therefore no construction, wilding :os grading psrmaits shall,,-be issued until phase IT of the dray t� Creek Channel ImprovOknt Proje=ct is under construction, m 4 MING CtlI�ISS V WOLUTIA �mli�x�: i 13281— Willi im Lyon h.Y January 27, 1983,`` page 5 (9) Jq,_Jq -Tieu fee as r-ajjtri� thy/ future iyaerouring of the` ek . ,ttn oeriiad .utilities (tt`lgco aernicitign and el4ttr ical )� n the xrpposite side of ;Rochester Avenue sshall be paid .fa; the f;lty prior to the recordation of t� Final Map. T fee shall be one -half the City adopted unit amount, timaz the length from the ,.',center of Base Line Roach to northerly termilous pole, �approximately at the north projeIt boundary" (10) Rochester Avenue shall ,bs constructed full width except that off -sf.%) sidewalk% and i7 ,arkway 1andsc;aping on the apposite Bid of V* stmet stay be deferred until development of the adjacent property from Roch ster Avenue to and i -tom lading ,the railroad crossi69 of, the Southern Pacific Rail tle~ norrth, (11) No building peamits, with Abe exception of modol homes, J stta° be ,, issued for afiy units within the. existing f'Ei�il! l Flo W04 Zone until the ;flood hazard is Mitigated to the satisfaction of the1ty ingineer. �t S. The De J� luiy Secretary tat this Commission shall certi ft lLa ° the adolotion of this�4esolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED` fifli$ 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1,988. PLANNING COMISSION OF THE Ci`iY'OF RAtCkQ CUCMQP 4 BYE ) �Y4 �La�rr e a n I J ATTEST.* Brad Buller, I pu y .; re ary 1, Brad Steller, 4e „ y Secretary of the Plannin Commission of� the . of Ra�tcho Cucamonga, do' trek_ certify than the foregoing Resol:utiom► amass dcmly arts rLIL larly introduced Passed, and adopted by the P161ning Cowlissio of the f Clrty of Ral}cho Ctic go, at a regular meeting f tti � Planning Commission held on the 27th day of l uary, 1988, by the following vota -to -wit: AYES: Ct1ig!isa�D,:E°C. NOES: Gt1M I HOMtRS.,,,k. -- L' ABSENT: C(3MFSISSIDiiERS. U , if th ''�� 41 �A11�y9P1.Y E piw3 iiy~� ]FOR a ..,g Z�;} 1 -S Tat' ark^ ell, U, - �j '" ;ark -ar �( 'C spg!t4 w s� Tk wig% AV zlip AS F4 4 M �,. w ity �F•(O�i Lq I ty� 40Y0 4 aj All 1;112- 101 pa St 4 .i.Y1i Q VIM- $S� -11 his Sm lar CIO MUM y A six Ilk !, il a In v -S So 3 if i u a IN is e" it N =lei uW a lit u Iva P-j pat L w i Y6 Y i R i y,• N =is jill al � M" y. V ! �jiw +wP Y ,,,, IL Z 1 42 la 1 Iry N�T ! f U � 41is M N p Atilt 1 "' a$%' tlA w i N y i V4 sat A .' N.�N '�'• : r wI V M W@ t+ '* NA % . f, 1: t =VP pip s'.•. svN i- +, ia� a7P .-ate, :Ei= ly 4lyPoor tv "3 y " , Lo a » i IgNI = w Ni ill g aN y x A Irs K 1.u" i 1�� g �LyY`y� ,.� rij W Awl W t M 3°ip » fit, «� MM O t� � M yr, {, L a "..s S� gr 9 »� �» 06 !� N g» Li x '�. x' a °� 17 h W -UA i ie» d f1j# 8 a N_ at I 'fal Ni :iy� tx ale 3 - �, C a 11 g - =a will N= � f MT-1 141 Ilk, � ;�.� �� $�� �� a = "� �� � � � ~ "� �z`• � �� I yy air]. Z r RRR RR+ �� t +MMii��i !;=.j lit �S'}c Y aY Wit �' � I.h +! •`11 M L IS r ��ivltA L M, M uP W y VIA- its fit 2 .ee �g _ : o � a �` "�� �. ,� �� Elba .,. 2 fit J-5— y � �� '. � �. _ y JMe ii• i Y tll i= f "` is ajN M' � R -9 Ross! � Us ;xi 4.5. pen P :i� �.. aca~°• � F� a ".�,1 ���� �1 fit .. Si a�H T x -x K � Y M ..i .` 1 I 0,�. a Ix B v` 41 q. N w pgggggg� r— '43 6 Y M. 3s rd « 1 i m v o� r'4 d � 6 =i 13 � M MVV { Y ve 0 sPi° dD `ej� •YF. 16 v fit .. Si a�H T x -x K � Y M ..i .` 1 I 0,�. a Ix B v` 41 q. N w pgggggg� r— '43 6 Y M. 3s rd « 1 i m of ~ M i a F�= 1 O �O` M r" � yy � a �, �', •``mow pp.� v L mY i y -.. T N •.. 40Y ♦ s _ lw • If EV ; -: Sri cc ry 1 IS Ali Z. W g x x= Y. •b �� it I yt . ..1�,�, r ♦ vial .a4r�ia, 2 if bhu p: 1 , ,, G i 0 C� i ICE a r 9AcTE: January 27, 144 TO: 0airman and Maa6ers of the Planning rarWission FRO* 2rad Butter, City Planner _ BYt Cindy Morris, Assistant P3anner SUBJECT*. ENVI OWNTAL ASSESSWMr AND TEMTAItVr 7RAG-r il� - -1? reAl0enICIA1 Sti Y S`i0n____47 s ncT j TAMITY ass on .Dl acmes of land in ttrat Lear Residential District (2 -4 derailing units per acre) isca-�ted t t�� 1 #1 side c.! ))oven Avenue, north of the Southern p%cifft Railroad - AN 202 - 201 »03. Associated with this project= is -Tree Removail Permit 8187. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action E. guested: Approval of aubdivision asap, conceptual grading- p am p using maps tree removal perniz and issuance of a Negative Dewlarxti, 8. Project DeasiSX: 3.9� towelling units per acre. C. Surrounding Land Use and��ninn• or •. Ex'T.t7nq-NIngleFam ;',dow Density Residential. ais- rict (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) \ti South Mobile tide Park-, Law - Medium Density Residentij,(I District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) East - Raveaf Avenue and Existing Single Family, Low Density Residential District (2 -4 dwa:tling units pe^ acre) West Existing Single FauaiTY; Low Density Residential: District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) 0. General Plan Designa#lb-ns: Froje-CTTire - T c+v� eiT nsfii y Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre? .� North Low Density Residential 124 dwelling units pq a �e) South K Law-Medium Density Residential (4-8 dwalting1/*1� per acre) 4 �i East -� Low Density Residential (2 -4 Owelling.,units per acre) Wes *,, 4 Law Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling nits a $ par &CC`s) r1 1. P MH1W CiY!'R'ii.TSIO STAFF REPORT J1`_ 137%_—D"' CqAM i QUp - J anun ;t 27,' 198$ _- _ Page E. Site Characteristics: Tht site is vacant, except for fi+ree { rAl Ing Stan s_ tit ndrowS. end, has a natural slope of�j.5 t4. 3 percent from i,n:Yt- to south,`) The sittAs bounded t4 the east by Haven Avenue and Ito the west by 66ter AvemQ &Ad siEgla j family hoaxes. T4 the north art, existing single family ho"s 6 and to the south is the existing Southern Pacific Pailroad with � the Alta Vfsta iftbi'le Name 'Park, below. A portion of the site = , is located within the Red JiM, F ult Special Studies 2jne and F7 -gat lone *e A. f,►ck 1v"MA lite,.project is tpitng developed as a tentttiv'e rac sUffivisiort only, Lot :fixes within the,subdfAsich will Vange an. size from a minitaaw of 7,210 Square 4 *et car a oWxi a of 13,7W oc :.ara feet with an average lot 41 2t of 8,26$ sa :tare feet. As a" Irt -fill ProJect,4 the street d6s o #net` *+ configuration will be consfstent in design with the existing \ ., : => tracts in the area. 'The internal street,desjgn will e�,t and connect La Vine Street`'and ddesatia Aventae rthfle`'CeatVr xenue will be fatly, Improved adjacent to the weste property' j ftundary. \� B. Design Review Committee: Thea.BesiO Review CoWtxee i£+aerick, Cis 4y, Coleman .=. reviewed the, project an Decembtr 17,, 1987 and' recommended appr6at subject to the following cot itfonsi` r a 1. That a block wall should be erected along the Aorth.., property line wherever an existinc, +„fence is ►tf agate: ial other than rx ;Isenr^y {wood .hairs ink i or .fir Is not ; adjacent to the p�pdsty line. _ The appli nt should wort vrieh aojacant property awmter5 01 to resolao the double wain issue prior -to the Issuance of buil�it+��`penaits. , 2. A decorative treatment sh 'ouid be ,r provided «long the south boundary adjacent to the x o Sesu them Pacific Railroad. The decorative treattmetit should include a darker "tolor i~extmared _ black for the lrower retaining portion of, t. e_ walV, with a lishter color decorative block on top. 3. 8rq ght- tyrant, low atainteftioce plant atnterial ^ she, Id be planted within Ift Southern Pacific Wlr., d right- of4ayy adjac4nt to the proposed `or distance 4 - uer, a 100 fee'c szlt+�ecy -fit3 *fife abpr4V!31 of the $$theft Pacific. poiTioad. . >V- fndroW r€ placement should not be required wfth% rear yard r A Kure intensive Iandscape area r:t,, lrhould` be to rttcivade additional tree , plapttng �Jflintinq �. pr4Vided within those areas with"'re; ui�re tslpe and Wia.bs with.tt. public right -of� r S rJ l ~ PLANNING �°AOTSa1hM STAFF P. PORT TT 13769 i cy J C:i, DESIGN GROUP Page 3 S, .Drip irrigation should be utilized for trees on any slope 40:as in addition totes "..al groundcover ;1 irrigzltioar 'chttiquass. C. Gradi '12 : and Terhnical Review Committee: she`. project: was rev ewc; ', or bq c ees an ermined, with -the recommen�'ad :conditions of appN6val9. to be in confomance with applicable standards and ordinances. D. -Tree Removal -Permit: In coniunction with the tentative tract, Ite ap ca, 7sas submitted free Removal Pemit'application 87.E E7s, *equestinq,ih�,� removal of three (3) vbdrows from the site (Exhibit "E" An- Arborist's re p,,ort by Knapp,; and Associates was subm #ttrd to the' Planning Divfis #on for rbrir. Vat, report recommended removal of the two windrows located at thd� canter0. of the site and along the north property �Ine;ano indicated that preservation .*f the windrow adjacent to fn AYe�Wn was possible -ji#. ;certain conditions4 The primary yopdit.c+n being that the ,of.,- onv1roYwnt re*mmain undisturbed f.r �J i ive foot, radtcs from the, basial area of the trees. A - thIs is not passible, given the proposed design of the si and as the F trees are in a ouestiorr ;�lr state of health, s aff recommends € remoirar. of this`wthdrow s ttject to the,, provisions of tho, , ty's Free Preservatiorm OrOnance, 422. The ordinance s =requires \, replacement planting with the Eucalyptus macuiata (Spotted Gum), which shall b: a Minimum of 15 .gallon in size, spaced-,.eight r feet on center, (' As to the others two windrows, recent City Council direct on has indicated that windrow replacemi'ent °shall not 6g require .ithin rack yards. Therefore, replacement planting " of the wi drow along a grisVattera shall not be required and instead a gore intensive landscape treatment; which, is to include joMit ;anal tree plantings, shalt be provided In those areas with required tree plantbg (sl ope areas and along interior "stsi�t public right-of-ways). 0. Envir�nnental Assessment-. Staff hus completed Part 11 of the Env ronmen a ec s and'found that the rproject will not We a signi �"icant I, act '!fin the environment. As part of, this,,, review, a geologic stvciy "and a prelimairary acoustical stud were preperu,' Results o the geologic stuy`v ind #gated that ;ere was no mvidence of = q?z,,r�surfaee ictiye fault tine on the project site. However.- ts of th .not a studyy indicate that a sound attdauatiotr barrier, Which shoulV be a 'fm him `of seven (7) feet in height, `fit p�. requ.red ,for hose lots { ;l rearing on or adjacent to !laver( ;inue in order to reduce exterior noise levels to 66 CNtL orJ ;e s A'final noise Study shall be req:dred or_iar to' the iss�a`nce of building- 'permitsi�' �{ These requirrment�i€a4 a n ir. rporated into the conditio>ts c Of approval. ' � PLANM w C I,SSiDFI i'C�1' WbA � 1 : O , 1 r _ TT 1,37,a "5 ARCS! i?ESICti 6RDPI Q�yp yy � 1 J 1 8 4 8 - - - III. FACia,,FV'R FINDINGS: no project ,:4 ,consi, tent t�ith the Req. rar `� an an ova -P--'I- I Code4 'The t l be 'de pr43*e w�j Aot ria nta to the Peal is heAl tb _- or! safety, or came aiu3 daces or; '3 iini fic -Ant ;. adverse RnYtoon JeR l,-uyacts. y{ ;Let :addi �a i<iain , . the - orQpOSto .t;S &« subdivision ��P nd 'conceptW gradirsg 0,40, , tootbor wit . Ahe '. y; conditions ef, \ \aprbxei' are, Inciia��te€ t!�tF{1ae orgtFJs ;ons'tti the bVeioaent C4i aKd City ��t"rd9i.` Iii. CORRESPOVMYCE' A notice of riling etas sent, to ,ali prope � tswers w ran a rioot radius and Oe site, fisted on Nov 'r is, I987. s; In ndslitin thin& itm ids men advertise es a pablic heariaaj'i9,-,ih+e Dail Report na paper and n tfcts "ft sent it* all '] f property reters"���`eet of the PtVject, site. V. REC ENOATIQR. Staff rre.'e,`i ►1 � heat the, Ptt;�ning' Co�st'':utpo trough approve- cn -five ; l`ract . I375g adoptto* of the -at, a ;V Resolcition with Condions and Lipprovd Tree R oval, Per�it ='� Od'isrue a Negative Deciarattan. Res full y S itted, `f Br I City P1 nner Attachments; tihib3t "Ag' 4 Site Utfflzatio i ' hibft "R" r Sub&ylsion dap R o GortcA,tuaal Grading, Piart 5.r3Se,ii.—CC" I�.+ut it M1i' y'.. �i . P1 _ l Exhibi r w p Tree A."Oval PTO# Exhibit "F ",. Tree_epiovai, permit "&" _ i - Exhibit -- Arboif st's Report ' Resnlution of Approval with Cooditiong i `t AP _ un�,. -_ "•, #4'�1'b'� ` �'.�4 f�qf tL t � 1 1. rn 1' •S= y 7'.. w..<_' Pl "" i� 1 "' � T jE r i �f -E(1w °? Z�.� ��E, tJtfn L 7✓.z.dw ( �� 1Ci G 1[� f ; M..i�- `a. -,ir� .L�Rj.. `1� L'�'��i' :�+ E ��� tF• r�,^�i.. •$....� � �`'�! .�t.7.. , �'�- ��r� � ► t A H i `, 5�` a ,�• �< f f 4 T--T pis �.rc�t9�w'}'°'� NW.� i- �rl�`fY -L :- I t � A l P �r c- jo at t arO::: cy a ao "tri -:l a� C e f : '7: i A a I T— ALT, E:9 ;R [� Et��: 7 � l l ((e Agee ( u"nr ._ ` -._ .Yrc3:at s+ca.R�> ... _ .. .x^ izr -�- ■Y ll ¢ {���.T r a:lY.t { rrarsw' nar {aif�ilKf iA :•z I. s E Sc�} .`s,� {' `Z 4p : * . r-' �w.'♦ r ore � �` r � i ,f� hrc :•-' r — �. _a6 t Nes w:• ALTA 4V -f4TA tlta klnt e p�tJih +. + + 1 • rT 1 ° awr (- F si {`7 . r"� 4.:i �`' j"11c.,rt 't Il l 7 u.. 1 tb� t,g i' _. i rats Fi t ttt r1{ I i; tli' I• 1= `-''t t J t,{�• �ij�l;. 1' ft {ff� �.., %! ;" I �, rl ('{,1 I ja� / er rY�w Iaii » a.:st W ave V. NO MY CIF RANCHO CLUANICTMA _ Pi..&NNM MVPPIN SCAM . ---------- 1 fy. •4+.� �. � I � �� :b � 4,, ... ! 11 / . �.._._ ���� _ __ �\ M � Yf f,/w, �Q! .(.l 4 A � _ It �r»ll{ � X' .7� \[1 :.(• �:Jr_.i 1 ! ! �'..{l :.+� w�_'�:.aif• _�Jid� .t'li° +•'(, .tip ♦ �! - ..�- :.!�,�„•^4 -_ fi ...n ✓�S•"'Y r.�s"' 7 i � e"'xr�r' .' f�', f r `i3 f 1 l rF; 7 � • fi J. t;e t..rlfnif< �� fib � ,�� xan► w�r��r'�' jr At '-j 1 r...21 tSC ' , � � :.� ,� "''a-^'T `t•� nF.. ¢i f �I t(.171{'X�,r � X L 1r�1, ..i ..., a '�,aae t i _ -_ ii. r •1 j.� ' � e ` i 7 `,�,. n . °'+�"' rx'.�iv �d" •.- 3�',f.• .es r� d, ;�• r" i`�� i y .� �,✓� I_�Ae. � W_�r -ae �w•� ..�rrr.J� i I i$ 1�r i$ f. 1 r t Fe7Rt Vi au fi mtaY7 Fl *jr, ( FAiRs 3K "x .�N�i MY CF � 1 Alh }7. {C d err IT ZRW 9 } { i '? t I ti HIP � rs Ri � 111 4 � n R. u.w• r4 jr mlm— NORTH f_ CITY CF rrEMt RANUD'tlrAM0NKA- Tam f� _ NIS . t � f ,tl�' �.. alt at � jO � a.r 1 a; `CITY- �j rrEMF 4 CWAM,.ON'CA *p Mew SCAM a 11 ID. � a AA /�. w�P����� a j"�� � � "'' •.; �h�'S��E r�f�a � �� fli , r P a- s .t P U NOMI I C cml CF y STEM= J / FiANNM ` lv> f- XHIBYT SCALE k-O ul -,t zz?i2rv� t a 1 I Clw OF ; RANUW CUCANKMA D MANNING-d�� SCALE, z 0 z 9Z �z �I LLE CL LIJ W 0 0 LL 0 z LU f� 0 Ordinance No. 27% pertaining to the preservation of trees on private property, requires that—no person remove or relocate any woody pianttain.excess.of f f4eso (15) feaklp height and having a singlakw* ciroumferonce of fift"n (15) inches fit more and nvAl 4rurA.ka haft a circumference of thirty ,00 Inches or men (measured 4wenty�fona {siohet ggKmd IaMN}, without first obtainin¢ s%ae =, Removal Purmit from the City. Jr. •6,r. LOCATION CF SUBJECT SITE: —.S1 NAME FIDDRESS, TELEPHONE OF) NAME, ADDREn.TELEPHONE �OPERTY €I�10(If otfiefs7it �I17� &J (818) 289 — 313 T. REASONS FOR REMOVAL (attach neclM=7y3hest1?s ' SEE'ATTAXMD PROPOSED METHOD OF REMOVAL: STMDARD TREE RE IOViAL• EQUIPPXM WILL BE UTILIZE APPLICANTsSIGNATUF3E:_„ �/ G `nAT This application s(taif Inch it4plot plan fikkatfng locLtlon of all treat, to be removed and retained. The species, nuMba,1; and size of the trees to be removed shall be so designated. If a tree is diseased, then a written Vdament from a licensed arborlat stating the nature of the disease shall be required. ❑ APPROVED ❑ DENIED By: Reasons: Date:. N tificetion of application shall be given to property owners within a three hundred toot radius ten ;aye pk: ,), o approval. If no appeals are received, .hen the permit shall become effective ten (10) days fro date of e action. This approved tree removal permit Is valid for 90 days from the date of final map recorco n or builomg permit Issuance, whichever comes first. Should applicant fall to remove the trues within this 90 day perioO it new permit shall be required, unieus an extension is requested fourten (14) days prior to the expiration o) the permit. K- (a... 0 cm Of ruNCR4 wrAMONCA (l �)} PLAN imr! vivtgoN I�iGTs78£R z. ��987 'NOV;, REASONS FOR REIN VAL.- 1. EXISTING tREZ LOCATIOW AND C01MVIO:d ARE NOT COMPAT'i WITH PRACTICAL OR E"ZCIMM SUELtIStISION IDZSJ, GN. 2, THE TREES POSE A POWNTIAL °GREAT TO LIFE` AND MPE TO LOCAL W'INASr A$D upRo :cNa or oto YK. ^iI — .:HANGES .ITT WATERI'R"IG AM -'�t.MSCA ?ING USES EY GNOME 3. – r+ �iNBAr atrc4 SOIL xxxc7NS CAUSING t1EltttOT SIG 11�t' M T S. l f 4. EEYGALXPTUS Titus UTR IY S.ENSI":TIVz. TO OREAXAGE.III� l I I� I I Cent Lrnpnya +fad 16 fyannst� tt �urveyfa� fr Snv+ronm�ntat ;�ntlysfa 1 iiT41 Mf, Y� 1W% SWif'C' COLT N�, Gas twOtSttxx 92324 �7tdi f��5oea y�M y r- � v „A lice 1. to% mom p, ASSOCIIAIES r. RDISO t Cfrmom CI:VXL zvk;" CfiMmii CA,lroom . t OILORVAY�` #n}iE`f 0 !• r ��oi3§, ri lEE2�XSiaMdiaRi Tam 40 AMM SxTTp wrZaT € r HAv,3�1 ,Amos, t` i PMAM ay*. F 'r gg -�s y�T t 71110—, _ j� nllkry Observation% recommendations JC& BUCAlyptus -and Windro p iervation Purpoevs for trees located between Basel 'Wid Oth stk�:et4 on t St side of Haven Avenue- in Rar ho Cucamonga� Ca, lifornia." J The wIndrov treex Are principally camaldulonsis (rod,, gum)- There are th,%:ae (3) windrow* that are maj7pad a number*4� on the enclosed tree location Plan.' There are app-roxiUm,#01Y one hundred ei,�hty-tw* (Is2) Euca�yptus " trees an �him pro� eVty. The criteria for preservation of trees involves a mu:A-4 pr,;Qess Of idantifying the trunk condition,-growth rites, ctur StrL Co pre ence of insects and, dizaase, crown, developMent and -,aost importallt,— life expectancy. More in dQPth thiW�wculd take into CoRtliaoratio, the foliager� color, density, and size.. with the new 4 rowth, C043id- eration must be givev to t' he App"ranca of budk4 i-"&4 color, Gi2e, and shApe-"I-,Th* trUnk concerns ate the cavitie*k C&1101�ving, ,�;Ctent: of wood decay, and mechanical injuries. An inspection of the root SYstem would check color, location Pnd rodt Ilare. Sao pale S. Z4 1(3 r1 _LltiSl jt*y . tae VIGr8676 3iE�; E�t'JCt" FCS"�F _> s3tudes of ature and the increas ng.' opt* presau e. In ye,*�`axal the trees hove la kCd this oul.tur-al c�sre ,needecljfor heatlthy specimens. y j = The east to west number 6c U21 'Windrew has lost appro���iatel� fi icy i percent' (S08i 'dense t r. to hack- of care and'i irrw 3 Mere. The general condition ,of I*o wLriaxow.a zs be, - 'average, a,�`'ut yelectri {: cal resistanc6 4' and vitality testing wan goedK ° " This generally iz�A a that the tr*4W axe not 1;^-op aud_tng maurki . aer�b t z �tl^er s operating on_3resery ea Cr 3t'Ordd__L enei ely. rhea e the a pars ive need of cul;tura7 carte 4� trees arty to % preserved, 2ENMUS107JT am RECONKUMAVIONS ter= 4 .. In are opinion, Eucalyptus windrow number ara ( #Z) shasald be pt6strVod and numbers •twa (3 ) , repl AC-3d " -The tre _s pre6ent cc ,- dition, coupled with propoied construction activity., wou'ld' &Oturb 'y developed root and candpgY az j a*,, thereby eating combinat one of .. stress that. preservation af r� r sirov`iiumber two ( 2) and three .(3) ; would not be recended. An electrical. resin nce (ei.l.ohmsi measurement %rdicatiin ') r l&tzva trace hSA1th -. Ixew with a loweV R.'R♦ TOW Easter an� havt'. more vigor than those with a ,higher E,91,, r �\v -Sucm� ptua= Vi4drow --Eiu 'er syne_. (roots) and canopy (leaves) envtro'ftent theKIhAve established over Pius yi-iarss of growth R 4evelopsrt�t p and ia seta structure. $t ecauiions moat bit exercised to out, urojenexgy iroduct„on for anti nual . growt.i prt aeset'. ` i�isrupti of!° of �h' phyL`ica " r ,ti c soil and canoes t31a f �r bips .krill trelate to. ii�ed coats, liability, and plart n�Vtality. Windrow$ must' be mainta:4fed within a n4,4; ,7, or forest like enyi� 9'nMent, provia4 trvei with Summer watering "and/or. day psxivd . »f ido sci.j mo stare. I _ pLr ne to X Iboacultum4-I'$ 11ndarcls. Sail test fct _,gertil.it� p 1� G �" , `percolations azi�estak7l�;shirs� , irrigation acbedule. i S64 fcxat :' i xtxrizue fit ba a astiea sat #yes . This, ,�2a mi iisiial ezi.stat wa. Any construotior activity wi.t rin ' L11 twelve feet (1210) would require additional site - inspection& for MI- sezvation nePda and eftor�'is. This represents a preliminary ,report 04 trees Sezitable for p!��s$r�. vation. Actual idantlficati -ors of the irrigation type a;ndr` ched�,�es, c 4�s , soil fp' tiiiaty, precoltian \ton'-� s amour i and t ype of orA a/ll ic zRa- <<� texa a , fertilization and s1i onditi gnng regttir ;rata. Specific tree pruning, replhcement, and relocation specific ati.ans� , sss {?d ° q» quire addiicional site nspecta,ans� to e'er` u7C4 accurate r pre "ntation. ' M u ff.J << cD ' ,� D PRESERVATION RQ iREMEUTS FOR MATURE TREES ,' \ t, ' Corrective p lining `t t o arboricultura?l g,,tandards for tree* prgoservation in urb ,4n development. (Certified Arborist preferred). A 2. Establishment of undistrubed woil zone around tree'. at a 12.1'riitio of soil surface width to potential trunk diameter. ' 3� Clearing of dense vegatation and,retention of ` all,--, natural leaf litter beneath canopies, installation y of wood' rhip mulch "un a need" basis, . f r 4. Whero sail has laser, catt►paeQ, ,o otherwise cii str��bed in the root zone area (particularly =,under canopies), fert,ilizati.on, aeration and watering via soil injectZ= r, '? i f of all acceiible soil, iz the root zone. ,1 5 ' . Installation of drip p type irrigations systems;�with capacity for periodic deep watering, duri,nig and after development. Water every thirty (30) d4y� period of insufficient Installation of chain link ,ncing to protest trees dura'ng development of the tree area: Chain link fence should extend, '�o,clrip line or well beyond on'specific trees. 7. Exr- Aination and doe me6tati,on of each tree, with r specific m�,i.ntena:ncelpre "-rvation requirements, c 8) T r,ansm��tt�41 of recommei datiana and specifications a \��r c_pntzinuing tree maintenance to pa ties or, in�tiv- idual.a responsible for tree and landscape m�na ea)ent on completion of ireacdevelopment. _ f r_ RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION O. THE PLANNING GOhMISSION OF THE CITY OF 254TO CiICAMONGA,�sPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAC M. 3x59, ZOCATEO BEST OF �yAYEN AVENUE, NQpgqTH OF 'TAS SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD I \THE LOW RESIDEI4TIN OISTRICF » APN: 202- 2D1�53 .� A. Recitals. i (i) The Iles Arch JaIign Group Has filed an application for the (l r approval of Tentative Tract Map No, 23759 as described in the title- of this Resolution.: Hereinafter Nn this,, Resolut;oon, the subject Tentative.Tract Map request is referred to as the application . (ii) On the 27th of January, 1988; :de.Planning Commissfair of the f City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concludd said hearing on that date.` (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution - have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW. THEREFORE, it is reby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commissi of ;tftb city .Rancho Cucamonga as follows: I. * This CommissirofChereby sp - ificaliy finds that ail of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct., 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing on January 27, 3988, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Co=ission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) 'rile application applies to property 'located at the west side of Haven Avenue, north of 'the Southern Pacific Railroad With A street frontage of 494 feet adjacent to Haven,Avenue and lot depth of 1269 feet; (b) The property to the north of the subJect site is Low Residential, the property to thd` south of that site consists of:Low_Medium Resiof®ntial, the property to the east is Low Residential, and the property to {{i the Brest is Low Residential. y l (c) The appli ,aht has filed; an accom�ranyina Tree- Removal { Permit for the proposed remo 1 of three (3) windrows fr4A_ the subject F �iperty based upon erborical sc vey and grading impacts, (d) A georgic Dort has been prepared, consistent with the provisfw of the Alquist- +Pript�vl�Aet and certified by the City's` Gee pgic Consultant, indicating that evidence of a near surface, active fault line "was not' ,encountered on the site, u PLANNING COWISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 13759 - DES ,ARCH. DESIGN -GROUP- January 2', 1988 - page 2 t� (e) A preliminary,,. acoustical stQV, has been prepared in accord with the provisions of the Noise (Element indicating that a minism seven (7) foot high barrier - ;Is required adiacent to Haven Avenue. (f) The proposed suh0vision design has minimuwi and average lot sizes of 7,210 and 8,268 re.�pectiye)y which are consistent with the requirementt for the distr1ct.in which it is located.; (g)_- -,'The proposed subdivision;,deslg end acco�wanying maps have `the been reviewed by Grading; Technical and .Deeign Review,, Committees and approved subject to the conditions' %sntained within this' Resolution, 3. Based upon the subs4ntial evMeQe presented to this Commission during the above - referenced pub'lft'�hearirq and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph I andl above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) Thst .tentative tract iS consistent with- the , General plan and Development Code-,"And (b) The design or improvements of the tontatIv'' r tract is consistent wfth the General Plan and ��Yevalopment Code; (c) 'ihe site is physically sVitablo for the type of developPent proposed; and ; (d) the design of;;Wesubdivision Is not likely, to substautiai tnggirW- dental damage arm awidab'le injury to humans„ and wildlife; or their habitat; and Y y, (e) The tentative tract is not likely to caui Serious public health problems, and (f) Thtt design- of the, tentative tract will not conflict with any "basement acquired by the public et lame, now of record, for access throw or use of the property within the ' proposed mibdivision, 4. This CWssiim 46reby finds and certifies that the project has, been reviewed and considered in' compliance with�� *e Calfiyornia Environmental Quality Act„ of 19,70 and., further, this. Commiss -en hereby issues a Negative ' ' Declaration,, l "ed upon the findings and conclusions Set forth in ,paragraph I, 2` and 3 above* . this Cosmmissionobereby denies the application subject to each and every condition set forth 'below and lit the attached Stanci_\rd Conditions attached hereto and incorporated "rein by this reference. PLANNING CO MISSION RESOLUTION No. Tr 13759 -,DES ARCO DESIGN GgOop January 27, 198$ y Pale 3 Pla, n� ng Tentative Tract (1) The rear yard slopes of the lots on the .,girth side of Q La Vine (33-3% 42 -53) shall be reduced to the extent Possible, in.brder to provide larger usable rear yarn areas, by lowering the pads of the lots to the imediate north, (2) Bank protection shall be required adjacent to Naven Ave nue. Design of the bank and wall shall be subject to P7ann?ng and Ehgineerbg review and approval prior., f to the issuance of building permits. - (3) A sound barmier, which Ahall be'emin nusm 4 7 feet in height above strut L centerllhe grad'i is requir d adjacent to Have; Avenue and shall *e ip aro� a Lot 1 to the 'north and Lots 6 and 7 to the sott The barrier may be canstructed with a .combination of Orthen berm and decorative block wall. (4) Dut-ta development requirements and poor hearth of the trees, the existing windrows on the site should be removel and replaced subject to the follow#ngc a. The windrow adjacent to Haven Avenue shall be replaced pursuant , the City's Tree Preservatkon ordinace #276 with Eucalyptus maculata (Spotted ,Guapwhich shall a minimum, of 15 gallon in and spaced°-8 feet on center. b. To the interior of the tract' a more intensive landscape treatment, which is to include additional tree plantings, shall be prnvided in areas with required planting (such as slope areas and along interior street public rights- of -way). (s) A final acousticaT'study shalt be prepared for review r, and approval . prior to the issuance of building permits. a (6) Parkway improvements on Haven Avenue shall conform to the findings Of, the City's Haven Parkway Beautification Study, (7) An in -lieu flee, as contribution, ta'the'constiruction of the ri�edian isiarld within H vac Avenue sh 11. be paid to the city prior to budding pet ssuance or 3 recordation a€ the �Nnal map, Wchever occurs firs *. - The amount ,,{of�the fee shall be $5?,oit per © k " �T o I? r tt�zt COMISSiO4 RE UTION NO. rT 73789 -DES ARCH 0 IGN OROup January E7, 1988 Page. f% t linear foot of property fronting onto Haven Avinue: U496 feet). (8) M in -li_., fee, as contribution to tithe future undergrou.ing of the existing overhs�o utilities ,( (electrical and telect unicat ns) on the opposite side of Haven Avenue, shall be aid to the City prior to approval Of the final siafi. The fee shall be cne- half t#riii-'"itit adopted unit "dunt tics the , ;Ip jth fr'pr9 project boundary to the sotttha) terminus pql � ti d9i, The +existing concrete chanr�gl _ tl fOCtI deep) 'nort�i of ` the north property 'line, "nding fry= %suds Street to haven Avenue, shall be rwred. i i10i pad elevations for lots within the food hazard area (Lots i, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 }, shall be, a ninian of one (1) foot above the b8se flood elevation, as deternined by the final drU; PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION MO. TT 13759' - DES ARCH AES GN GROUP �r -Wary 27, 1988 Page 5 (2) A decorative block wall treatment provided along the southern boundary adjacent to th;Southern Pacific Railroad right- af-way. The '�, &coFative treatment shrill include the use of a ,darker colored textured block for the lower retaining portico with a lighter, decorative block on top, which is consistent" with the wall T�g Haven Avenue. 13); brrlught tol erantl I low maintenance plant material shall ,'be placated within* £?f SOUthern Pacific Railroad right- of -wad ad�jaceo to the proposed wall for,,A distance of 100 feet, subject to the approval of the Southern Pacific Railroad. (4) The barrier wall and landscape treatme.-& used along Haven Avenue shall be consistent <with_,"are City's beautfftcatien plan fok the Haven ;Avenue corridor. Landscape and irrigation plans shall' be reviewed and ,/approved, by the Plannfn3 and Engineering ;Divisions , prior to the issuance of building permits. (5)" A drip irrigation system, shall be utilized for trees W, any scope areas in addition to normal groundcover flrigatf66 techniques. (5)l All dwellings shall have rear and side elevations gpgraded wittt additional detai l ftg repr 4senting' 360 c'esrte arch :, cture. 6. ?the iteputy Secretary to this Comission shsii certify to the adoption of this Resolution.. APPROVED AND ADOi'e ED THIS 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. Wei, raa rntao ATTEST: 'bra ua er, epu y re any 1, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the pl- -,41 ; Coaimissiort of the City of Rancho,Cucaa0nga, do hereby certify that the fir- e6oIring Resg`!,ution was duly ands,. ` regulk ly lntroeoceri, passe, and aflopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho ClIcamonga, G. a regular meeting of the Planning Comtaission hi d on the 27th day #11 January, 1988, by the following vote -to- wit: AYES, 40MMISSIONEAS�, NOES: GFiIaSIOi►ERS. ASSENT. COFtIS., d°�IFRSr3 } gal w Y : - lips �� !t y � Y Ma Y s` i hit Mal j a } w N Y is I Y R hu Nil fi_,�: iii Ali yy Via � V s, ��'. �i. +c Jul 1vvt,� � i r �� JINX vc 16 R« c; Yr fill "x ' ;a Pill x11fli !,fitr Yar y i �• cif IZr; kwhs SIB »i� M M n N LLM r f� L# ♦l M Mr 2 q - 4� €Y sli CA .. Y� * I^ �i T. RZ �y Y fit ji 'A tit 40 41g— yyy yy� ly 5 M Y� M .•ice' � �eee " t 9r Usle a " N O IRS N� g I Exit w ' 4"1 r �r wV • F Y !` � � VA ~� i s # s_�,. C�• -1 Y w i g. -NJ I] fsi - . - f M w ff $�xi� e s u�w !N sit s `Vt K� r y�S IV tJtt IL Ti t r� $�3 A r$ W1 igsl 3 K r.� p is _ � jimi w s j Ny 7 N' Y 4 1 ; g!. -.nc th PIS U:. I I i w.M _ Y! t P - �` y N SI � w G � -* A W_ a $�3 A r$ W1 igsl 3 K r.� p is _ � jimi w s j Ny 7 N' Y 4 1 ; g!. -.nc th PIS U:. I I i w.M _ Y! t P - �` y N SI � w G � -* A W_ • rsw. y_$ �- king 3� Y vy - D P � � J C1 y g if yy y�. IFZ Y .,�y µ, y xY w •4 -i RE ` sio +gi l' $ ate ^ .F °' Ic hit O .I, o � R aR 383 1.1 # AIR j Vail •i ,. ;i _$ .4aZ e� #x all .� saga �i.,' y3 M C i qv�y w it X41 i ppEy r 4Y �g 4 �p ZZ ��L• fi+e� E ^9 ifiX tit tY� Nyi�. r•' y N Lb� N� M� M VrY I val 1� ' if �J�� t .. al.,q all r - 1<1 ,4 AAk nil ir♦ r3lwM AI �a i s 34 Sw g w a ..iob mA r 4sx 3 of k - z ti i 1v tl rp yy rgj. } ' •�. «4i'".5 \� _ L A rvSS •- � � i�' � <. iii �z� w ,� �'� � y .y. .2 �y� Z. _. W'ht �,�`W4 L. -. 6171•D : =i14� � ®U. i�C �N ��'�� ''� -M � :. �:.> i • ti _ tl) t�`1 ii)j Sri' C• �"' ! � ',�f. .,,��^ �`f -j'f �' f7 op tP c + y .0 M�Oi y jX Ij a N- a .1 M Y b r _ ii-N- 1 Lu uct h TI _r A-A; _5 I allu V� F 1 LAll ayes titfs f 57 L~ w yr,w its gn IN V .51 �} Y � E R� is x r` a rt76a.,�wfXr'Rxw e ' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA c�Mo DATE: January 27 194 1977 1 To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission f.;, FROM., Brad Buller City Planner �I BY; Cipdy Korrts, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: 141HOR DEVELOPMENT 'rIEhEw 87 -39 4LORES - An appq�a1 :of s a s ec: ;s a� ►? env a .propos addition `r l 230 square feet to air ' �xisti g ,Aonwconi'orwing residential structure within t,' (General Industrial, Land Use District j (Subarea .$ - locattd at 13233 Arrow Hi9btAY 4 AN 229. -171 - I. PROJECT AND SITE 0 ESCl3IPTIQN A. Action Requested: Approval of a request to expand a non - con ern 7 " structUre, and Vitae. B. Surrounding.1and Use and o6in ; r or - Vacant,- Ez1W arr, pec is Dian'; Low - Medium Residential (-8 tlweiling units per Acrei l( South - -,,Existing Single family Structure; Industrial' specific },l an, Subarea B East - vacant, Single Fam91y Structure; Industrial Specific Plan, Subarea, 8 West - Single Family Structure; industrial Specific Plan, Subarea 8 C. General Flan Desi_gnarlo_ns• Project site--- 'General ustria4 r Worth Low- 34edim RONdenstial (4-8 dwell ins; units per acre) k S ate w General Inds- 1 jal ` ,Eest General In&s`trial West General industrial E. Site Characte VOIcs• The suEj4ct property consists of an • ,s squar" e"T'c 1l w4tich fi 3, frontage 06 55 feet ar' a depth o. 155 feet. 7be site i3.-- �veloped with an SSA foot residential structure anu a partially construct- 230 square foot additign. ' A driveWay access runs ad,acent to the t' western property line sorting both the subject propert; and the lot direptly to the south.. ,r TT£M � o PLAN* C"IISSION STS-F REPORT 141NOR DEVELOPMT REVIrf 87 -39 - FLORES January 27, 1988 11. AH...:_ A. Back rebind; on July 28, 1963,; the property owners fj.jetliiinl r , e re ape: �a Review 87 -39 requesting a 4$0 square feat addition, to their existing. SW rtquar-elfoot'resident ,41 structure,,, After, an Initial Oeview by th+e' PTaAning and nglAearing Division., it Was determined than the existing structure z.0s non- conforging with the current prouisions of the Industrial Specif1c. Plan , aid that, according to :Pavclugetent Codo Section .1,7.02.130,; any expansion or enitn!" of the _Structure coald flat be pemitted. The F gets Were 1nforrrc;d gf 0,0 and ,given thv opportunity tp, with&AW their a plicat #on, thereby owino, a ful1 i<,4fun$' 4 their fees (Exhibits Me and `°F" }. In late r,- Isay. while .n#r) a routine site to 5pection iir � the 'urea, staff, noticed ;cdnstrd4tion of an addition Was under way ..at thie�`� ;,e. � and ism Eftforconnt was, notifie& 'Orr Deceiver 7, 1387, the Plannivg D,, isior: received a latter fra4t the FS ores requesting appr:9val ftrr. cc*stnt,tion of the 230 square foot addition,,, S,tdff respandexl --to this request on j De bee 15, 29 the i Flares that any oxpan$ ion of a non- cooforming i see i'sr;�rtjhibfPW by the City's f�ragcf al Cdife� and therefore, could ' adt be - g roved by stiff. 7h� property owners filed ate appeasl - of,�° is decision to th€ PlartnIW4 Commission on December „28, 19�Ij.' B. Analysis: The skibjtict property is lutated the General n us r ai IAnd Me Distrizt, Subar0a s. Residential uses are not permit�,ed or., conditiana1ly permitted �tithin.' this. district. As a r ,ul b, rider tie provisions ref the iAjnjcjpai bode, the existing single � ily str;asW". is ,zlassified,.0- a pre- existing, non- confo- x-� -us . The use *Ay be ca crinu6 cs is and rcutin+e maintenance and •re airs, pay be performed on,the structure. However, aerordin to _Section 17. 02..130.1 of the Deyeiopnt Coda, *16s► ► -craei ass -hall be enlarged or eat in such My " to a CWP,y:,&rj pan of !*4 struct-ura ar site Or only Ot?Kr structure :� s�,tr.� chick i�:4fd not occwpy at tiav it beca at Iran- saRfotst4 ate, crrjn SU& a VW asp; to displace uv. confo#*, g tine accup ng.a structurra or site... The intent of this provision is to limit the exteltG, intensification of non- cariforming uses in order to, ensur~k` uc. t the discrep rcy between existtn4 ,Cunditions and' Code regUIrements 7(c not inct- eased, thereby � ing it difficult for peraaitted useltt to develop in the area. - Oenial of this, apps � id necessiia�� use re W41 square foe. dition Which was i11elgily Wi out the equ9reci provaT and permits, � �� _ � C+LAi �fiiq C"ISSIOM STAFF EPORi 4Ifi?R ttEYE °9E1#1 REY>I R 3Q - FLORESt J7 January 27, IM III, FACTS FOP FIIOIMGS• Pursuant o, t� prgyjsions sf the ikvelo rat 1 ode- S7 _ ase7 ng >Comissfoh hit the au�ority 'to 4raot �� { applicant's request to ehlarge the exijting- nun- cqK ")MIng I structure• -'!r3" ii 4 of'the folIomf% findings cNn he made: ° Tf ,That the 'the pm pased t"Pansioia t l i not bi'detr Jmental xa the.,goajs;an o6jer'jv" ofx,the ieneral'Pliff" G -• .i J _ AIL _� �t it 7ladt Vie proposed ;expansion Trill not be detrimental. to �� 3 t the publ is heal t h, safety.; "I fsrg, , 3, ;j That , ther propsed request Ali nut; tsrterirll injurious to properties , or 1, isrp�ti aua�'ja° tF.i � vicinity. f} - .CORRCSPOWEWE: Phis ��m , has brt n, 4dyootista as a ptM!c !Tea �i z �� The ugly art new:pa ear an o i es rtr�s n �t all orers W n tat of the };he, �.° - , `open ► l P `yi Yt �i$ted� L ii. 1RECtt4fidOI Staff, re�ct+nds that the Planning Cor�aia3io�t deity rGqul�st tai aR3 . an expapsic41 of,, ! ea,i Ling ' Singio faMily 5tri2#U � ►wssi Wadoption,of� the- of $eni�L' wflth Conditf. :v, :1 Y Respi ully itUd, 1� 1. Bra Ote"` A�ta6mientsa Exht!jit_'A" - Locatian -gyp! - ExhibM� tiC - Site Plan (960 sgjore feet) Exhibit 40M Site- P9 6 '(230 square feet')� 0 '`- Origin Lsttteri and. Aopipatio(� Ex��ihit, +NF*,- EI�f',_ ; t, E .�ibit Pei and Refund ��• i[ Exhibit *O" = Letter of-, caber t�,.5 81 h Eibit 'Oq - Letter of. ewer a ��' r l• s � �`:. Mbit all Leiner vfjjppeaj � r `R sbittion of Oen l 1�3 4 w j ftw HtMYt r� s p it E Praralcd doe toy a r:.a. ' 4s•a %s�a ii f" i. yO r Prop af� l.it 35'rrr— r !L�g,,,�i,�g3l dry C CA UN A aw FXHRT c _ Wtl�k r r� `� � «r �xrsrmvq- 4Fauscj'� Nov.) F ff n > ze RaWsd ar< R.. tc } 1, NORTH MY CV RANChO CU M - y Tqi Planning Diviaxon Review Board ice: Room addition(s) 1 - We would l ik*�'to add two b" +3i'v s, a bsth,- �s daft, and a laundry room to our existdt.g home. � The reearsor,.fo t{ is tnCghat wa nr,,ad,cboth an extra in rust and bedroom as the ;er' era tktraa workiAt ho-alts and a ts`ita3$eer fqr the 61"'14 existing biZthroom and tv' bOlxoomsi ;, Our oldest son will. ;ba livingl;lMt3.ka us -until he Il Finishes collegep,J� hit. aeon# ou teeet�a a daugate:r mutt sl,"p un �:t4t living room . or, $ d has b*en fay some .time' becaut t of, a ck 6f a ace. ` We would also like to add a away Laundry roaeR so that they roo:x currently, ueod for that pur- pose, which ad joinsk` the kitchan , can ;bar ,con vented and,,used are a pan.t6)`area far- ,stursgo. The: den is being lidded purl a!'y far ralara,tioa I ant- camsuriian at tb* end of thee.work,dalr. We have .,aidesd at this ttawne ad.3xeses- for over 21 pears and have no, plans ,to move io the near £uuare. ,All that vet} reaquea�t � :; to-be allowed to make our base as cac�foxtab}.e a!� goax as that Vie 'may enjoy now a ieomo xer�e w�rived so hard to improve, .- Think you. M ,. & Mrs,' Him. ua] ly ' y o bi . ucamong Uniform ,A►ppli atia r Al Z G GENERAL I PMAlwa *'REGOIREi3 ! !, {' N NAME OF 9110POSE0 PROJECT P o + + R RELAii 7 Ffi E °. `-" 1 1 L LOCATION OF PRO WT (ADDRES APPLtCANT3 NAM f fkYEPHONE z 3 ADP: S( OVYNEIiR'C NAME S J J• TELEPHONE 1 ADDRESS 3 ,13; fQ 1C V1 0Z A/0 O REVIEW REQUEST E D' _ _ Q R _ r 10 TECHNICAVDESION REVIEW -- ❑ CONDIT'(3NA;. USE PERMIT -- C CGMMI;RCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL* NON CONSrJUCTION* 0 0 TECHNICAL," 1EGIGN REVIEW z 0 0 DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT R RESIDENT1At.* I W ( (ZONE CHANGE) , ❑ ❑ TOTAL DEVELOPMENT: 2 O O GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 0 0 BASIC STANOARDI� MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 0 0 CUSTOM LOWSUBDIVISION ❑ MINOR EXCEPTION C CI DESIGN REVIEW {REAPPLICATION} LIJ t t D D PRELIN41NARY REV12W* ❑ ❑ VARIANCE WW 0 0 ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 1 1 F 0 I " 0 tho Uniform A IEeatian PPGIF -CT I)F.SC ;- � Q . . ` rut. SCRTONOFPRPOSEOFlKNECT (ATTACH A001 LECTSIFNESARY 4 LL C Cr t 1 t— O OWNER CERTIFICATION w I I CERTIFY THAT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FURTHER, I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING, OF THIS.APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALI, Oi" TH ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE. AGENT OF OWNER MUSTATTACH A Lt~iTER d I: i . . ° AUTHORI TION PPOM THE LEGAL OWNER. # d DATE at 1 M `' .A4 Decemhri _Ir, 1987 Dear girs: Several months 401 July, 1987, we requested from the plannins commizaton to ArVrove an addition of approx- imately 80th squire feet on our private rsidente.'' This ci was ,intended to stake. the home more spav3.4us and cam- :? foitable a,e three adults and one tewaager were occu �., ing a two - bedroom dvf4ling. Deedless to say Apace is at a clearly Fermiscion was denie f,d y delineated, nor det�iled. �ftop re. one not at a. ve determined that we could to 4onger'li*ft in ti this home, .with coadtions us they area ;, Unahle'fir ancially, and not having thi desire, to' move we PIto- nr f ca;_&e.' xith an expansion, nonet;�eless, of Iv rgasre e feet. We had no derAre did, go ajainst lawful city E nrliry, but the judgement to deny permiss,on to build, was unfair` attd did not consider Vie rature 04 our si' - uation. After living her some�28 feats', 5Awzys hoping for the day when we could finally add to such a SM4 1 l hone (Lenz; than 800 sq, feet ), we °thought it rati.onnl., fair, and just. to add on Ito a homy 'we Town; qr. property \1 k we own. We ask; that you gtease recons; der 'A ' ?-` previra ,: decision and a3.,o�Jv us to continue with hur e4 iri ion. p �6auel axid DgliA F''io ✓re +''`�''�"�" � Zak A i \ f 0701 -02 0 1 -27 -88 PC Agenda � .of 6 .. ewe•: .t .w..,�#iw0.+XSt'iP: t ;�,t�Afi'i'�i� ...;jam IF , .r 4 .s 'tli�, Ch liY7P - -• r3`- -^.Re..:+...• -.�- —. i tiw.x+`. �P�:st �!y���»����r�^f��i*rY, ' >er�r .,�,�7...M.+ •.:..�..v - t . �..i 4t • k Y '� h tkT..+ t +�!4+w'Yt'.nrwy�.� _ITOTAL •• tv ; *TOT X3 tti Original Poor ., 1r I /f lvj �141 a a ALONr 9990°. *FUND !INCA sv�VRCVIIIU FEE h K fi 't ;t WARRANT NO. tit ." 'tli�, Ch liY7P - -• r3`- -^.Re..:+...• -.�- —. i tiw.x+`. �P�:st �!y���»����r�^f��i*rY, ' >er�r .,�,�7...M.+ •.:..�..v - t . �..i 4t • k Y '� h tkT..+ t +�!4+w'Yt'.nrwy�.� _ITOTAL •• tv ; *TOT X3 tti Original Poor ., 1r I /f lvj �141 4-\ CITY OF nANcffO CUCAMONGA. i I ft - OMCV,101801, ?W40 CUCM MIC CA6 *44 9(770. (7t +) 90.1$ri December is, 1957 f RESIST M NJthc'. Mr. and Mrs.. ftnuel Fiords f 13233 Arrow highway Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 917339 Dear Mr.. and Mrs. Flores; ` This is in response 'to yagir,> request to construct a 230 square foot " addition to your hoarse lociud at 13233 Arrow Highway. Unfortunately, the house is located in -an area that is 1"d Industrial, and is considered to be a non- confar lerg use. The City's municipal Code prohibits enlargement of non- cfinfiorming uses in situations similar to ,. this-- in our City Attorneys 04nion we simply have no autf ority , to , approve your request for an - addition. You,,, may perfor!�isur routine mintenance arid repairs on 0* structure, but :,E cannot t a, necessary permits to add on to the is :t�ding. Attac?ht is a cl.,of the non- conforming use sections/: _the Municipal` Code, wtta, the pr f -ginenet sections highlighl�:d. ..... (/ Please note that- this deoislon W a;e appealed to% the Planning Commission within 10 days. If you cnooae 10 appeal, i 1�ter oa;tlining your request and a $62 filing fee will be necessary. If you choose not to appeal this decision, you will be required to remove that— of the structure constructed illegally without build pests thin 3 days of -this letter. Is you have questions, please f:el free to :all. \ inset , Otto K Wtil Dept/ City Penner Attahhment cc: Brad Bull or, City Planner,', rran;, Buildint_Ufficial i R$chAA Alcorn, Code enforcement Supervisor 1, +:J: r - dSC3ctAh $Cis4R *) l'l - Je1Ta;y Ktilt, L?tnat f.0 stout. E u!ei1 liuquci [l FAMIP t'Wttght Uurvt tit [ f%. 6. Noise sources associated, with the maintem nee off real p activities take; place. 4atwewz ttf hours of a3xceap2 SunnAy, or be�tYeen the hours sft 9 a.m: eta P. 2. Acay aativftp;tQ ttaaa�'atxtent regulation Char been, p Feoraal 1AW. F. Schools, Churcaas i,lbraari He"91tf: Yraatitnt o reei tki 31IIIfiiMI L f61C to tar i�ny t}Q W '�4'#�'F school, h%pitet or hs# art iausettaacioaas rhau° a, Searton 1.7,02.130, pray p�?sv_idedr said S p.m. on apy dory as Sunday. eanpted by State or c.- Provisions. - tt shall * noise level at eny r libraary w the prescribed for tl16 ones r��' -/ZoW in wtuh Via school{ ht�}tel, church or library s tOcs,a�. �1� a G. . !°.dministeation Any t,��t , creeaetia� or permittin, the omat rtat'o£ at noise s ee detirobd -t this CO le, , azcat atheawlitie sxal� 3 by ttws precta tng- section Cods• s6l w i donxtitute, a viWation of this Gr✓ fi tad dish be allied as suet' It. f6k Facia Violation. Any wis aaxa**&* tto noise levstk �tmndaards toe rr draagnat na a ze>m ss spWifted in this Bactim chalk be alaaerried to be prima fa ie eviftee of a vi'oi -tion of the provisions of ttsia- Sfttiorr., a A. �P . This , Ssotion is inti�WW to Umit the rumber ,ud eke ;t of naaas • cwror, ins :aas'by.regulatting their ealarpiment, their estates )z ieiat atta.• j abandonment, and this atterstioal,�* rutprstion after destrootia; of X , str4atures " they om. upy. 1n sMltiaan,: this senora is intendo to limit the namW and extent 1 of nora snfor`a siaag struaalweas t!� ' pra�tibiting #tta:: being mw;tid, 4teredt or eWarved in at manner tfiit taWd ink they dsmpanoy,botwsan etW.ing ea nditioaa and tint s*Wan* gksceAy*d In this Coda. i B. Continuation and. Ma inte, ra 4inancet 1 taws lawf4y a:aaetagiying a SU%kttuare or as sita „that does not conform with the use regulstkas or tta site artier reVeAtions for the district ire; which the U!�l is located a1 be e>semed w be a teat- MOrming UN and may be e6n AU4 al XCW 04 OtMrWbS Iitsiftd in this Section. 2. A strWturo, lawfully aawApy ng a site, that does aiet conform "with the A&Adgr& for front yea 4 $160 yaaards, rear yard, bight, eoverager distances between strUdure±i,; and paarkft facilities for tiaae district in which the structure is locatakif`ghaeli be deemed to boa a non- confotmjtq seruoture and ataay bG urea# ' M4 }tainOds except as limited provided in this Station. 3. Itoaitinat midAtaaltnae and repairs may be perfa rmod on a non - conforming use or Structure. 3 - t3. J 4-16-1 ca _ o r` r Section 17.42.1.1,p C• A16VAUMS and additions to Nbn- coidormi Urea and Stru a ures 1. No %n- cWcrmWg use shall be Vdargesd or extended in such a gray ar; to occupy any part of the strwture yr dte or any other structure or site which !t Odd not occupy at the tsetse it tzecame, a non- *Worming rasa, be in such a WAY as to dispia+4 any Reforming use occupying a structure or site, excep as poemitteo In this 330Vd0,1; r. 2q No;;WF;*5r!A latg strueiury aFra11 be altered ar e�acnstrttctenl to incK�aa ey beta t ecsaxirttic+dr`end thG for froatt ybetween trurt fae:itEtie�s affi paeaarkred itt t`retctatioa for the, c*isa trtratc#ure i► Ioaette�d. D, Diseoatinuatisxa cf Noa7*onicrtniaaa tTaa Wiaettaver a noa cactatotriiatg uwse haa,, been mg"e o`is tn:t tie or a rii�+patWnued fir a eautin4aes3 p4rird of 180 dogs or more, the nOR-0dotmMg we shall not be react fished, and dirt-. use of the struature or site thereafter shalt be Lu c,onfarr -,ity with the r6 ulatw, for the district in which it is Iocsited, provided that this aactioa si-ma not Awy to non - conforming dwalling units. Ij$aaanttinu4tkn shall lnol a t+lcntiituatiis °. ei US�s rogardiess of intent to remmo the um t1 E. Ghun¢e of Man- Conformin Ust. The Piiaaaft 0)mmission may consider and Y approve, car cats tio"Aw"apgrove, ae request to Change a moat- coolormfiv u to a f different non- �ewf'ormitg teat+, pt*vkkd that 1) tbora io ra raw strv4 toe# %) si old f use is mat of greater inteaaity (et, traffic, noise, density, r4ftlt damww odor, tight), and 8) said use aontglies whir tits pcovio#Oase 9actrz7,D i.Y3 D+C, aatttject: to a G- aarditiond Use Permit ea tagteraitieed in Beall xt i7.04.il30. F. itestcration of w ::Dama[sd Structure l.. Meneve r a alzueture which 4m t comply with the staaatdai+ds 10, front yard, side yerds, near y+trd, hel t of structures, d:startt?as between structures and pexkin facilities as etearibecE the regulations for the - district it1 which the structure is i, tad, cr use of Wit does not r conform with the regulatiorta for ths�` s int✓'fn enrich it is:'` located, is destroyed by fire or other calatnityr by act of Good, or by the pab ; enemy to the extant of 50 peercent or 1000, the strricturs may bar restored Arad the conforming ua+e may be re+utM4 proud fat restoration is started within one year wid diliganUy piars4W to convj!- ti ku Whan the destructi,7A excexoda 80 perttealt ce the stricture is vole tia-ily razed or is required b,„lew to bo razed,* the st- ucture ftU not be rea z4*- except in full conf�orankt with the raguiaHOns for the district in which itlis located and the a - canfc�7mhv strati not be resumed. 2,_ The extent Of-damage qtr partial dent ixatioat sit a be based upon ttt q' Trade of the estimated 004 of rosttoring the :twtu to its coast3ition p'riart�tta such damage or partial destructio?t to the estimate ` coat of duplicatirg ttg� entire structures as it, extet;d.i prior there to. La'a.. ��,�rets for this purgova s fall be made by or shalt be reviewed and approved by the Building official and\ shall be based on the minimum cost of et> Wuction in compliance witi,�the :k du ng Code. \ ffevisetd 3f5fii',: ' C - n G« City Planner,,'_ AnY caguesf toz° alEaratfon, ,expansion +�' restoration of a determine V mplisme with the pravisiMS, 404tained in this section, or reftmA to "' Wore -sun o c� ueaz � �taeu aifi�d in Section 17 � �G-ti � -'The G;ty ��' it to l the Plartrt Go,nmission as, « = Inner A sail. rootify the appLaant end WMV=din property owners of the decision.,` �eisfon of they Ott PISCIor may be Sp&al6d tW any sggrieverd party within t4a f 1Ui Calendar clays of the da*Wotl. li« Planninsr-Contmission Review. The PkAnint! Comrnfssion daA at+ndusmt a public Pur�lsnt to �iaffori 17.02.114, Planning CbnrmLa oo. shall review h+satsflng I� each SU matters of feint. ''iu C�ton may grant they request, $vault the, request with modification$ or deny the test. The Corrsrtfssion shaif, state k that Eice :tisgnest will or Will not be detrim6ntal to the goW, objectives tof the, General €Mars and fhat such,reguest will or will rot bo 4etrimeotai to the public -k._ - = health, seetyr, x welfare, or mitoria.%iy fnjEwioua to pe ties ter improvamtwAn f the>! vicinity. i -17 a J4 ,. To Planning Commission; on Dec. 19, 1937 we recieved your Iexter denying us permission to add 230,. act; ft, to ati htmt3 We a�Ce agpea3irg to this letter because st I r{�ed the extras space, was still need ,zhe ,extra �, thro ,,A, We thought we had explained es�er*hing `- in 2 pkevieus `Petters, i, r� I, This is -r.-,t" warehouse of any kind that we are conforming d,o living quarters it has always been a house. We are just urging to add a small amount of space. We do not understand what „ yQq want prom us,.Do we need to go to court on this? 0r -does 6to City of Rancho Cuca�aonga. plan to buy us out in the near future, in whfah' case you are. protecting the city? ` ' What musE we`'ihink ail this fuss over 230 sq. ft. We sta.rtdd'- ramodiling I June wL a Permit or S wi''dows ands - 'now; our house is half flinished be' cat +se we r11�ri3d to d� the right thing=' and f get permission to add more spaces .,. The coeajlasion has ` caused Us alot of mental anguish,, over this waiting,. There is building all over Rancho Cucamousa, our home is faraway :from the city, and our addition cannot b-e Seen from the street.. Ut will appeal again and again because we canntlt move out of here as much as'`w&' would like to, because as we wee it. it ixx very silly to be asking the planning com;'2is ;on for permissios'I to add to our own home, Mr. and Mrs. Manuel Flores cr . 1$2.33 Arrow %iwanda, Cal. 91739 Ph.# 714 - 323 -535' ,1 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAmr-A PLANNIiG COMMISSiCIN DEW14S AN APPEAL OF STAFF'S SWUt1ltE FOR Alt EXPANSION OF � AN EXISTING MM- CONFOP14ING USE, MINOR DEVELOPMENT MIEH. X W. 87 -39, LOCATED AT 23233 ARM HIGNAT 10 THE aN£RAL 74DUSTRIAL LANAI USE DISTRICT (SUBAREA; 8) - APN 229-171 -21 A. Recitals. (I) Manual and Odetia Flares have filed an app e(3 Of .staff`s decision as described in the title of this Resolution. _ Hermit fter in this Resolution, the subject appeal is referred to as "the application". (i "t) On the 27th of January, 1998, the Planning Commisslot of the City of A ncho Cucnonga conducted a duly noticed .,Wic hearing on the application and concluded_said,'hoaring on that date, (iii) All legal prerequisites to,tha adeptton of tLIS Resolutig( ` have occurred. t B. Resol-ution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby. found, deterpined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows.' 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds(hat all of the facts` set forth in.the Recitals,, Fart AR of this Resolution ar4 true and correct, 2. Sssed upon substantial evidence presente4 to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing an January 27,-1988. including written and oral staff_ Pnrit ,,, toget)ttar whir public testimony, this Commission hereby specifica)V finds as ;follows; (a) The application applies to property located at IS233 Arrow Highway with a street frontage of 55 feet and tot depth_of 56,:feet; and (b) , The property to the north of the subject site 'Is. Low Medium Residential 14.8 dwelling units per acre), file property to the souin of that site consists of General industrial: Subarea 8, this property to the east is General Industrial, Subarea 8, and t? a property to 'the wed - is General Industrial, Subarea 8 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presen;�ed to this Commtiss1w during the above- referenced public hearing and upon:the specific findfngs of facts set forth in paragraph I and 2 above, this Cowdsslon hereby ffi ds and concludes as followsa (a) That the proposed exM_nsiC,rt 'is not in accord with the goals and objractives of the General,,- Plan. Y. PLANNING r" tISSION RESOLUTION NO. MINOR DEVUJOPMENT REVIEW 87-39 - FLORES January 27, 1988 Page 2 AOL 6�' eXpanS, (b) �Mat the pr'000sed on will"�e detrimental to the public healthl, safety, or welfare.' (C) 7hai the proposed expansion will be materially Injurious vo�'the propertiee or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based Upft the flodings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hev*OY approves the requesUC-1ppeal and. sets forth the following-condition for this property* (1) The 23b square , foot additfo4. wilich was Illegally C003trUCtOd Wilthout the 4casi4ry approval and peraffit, shall be ramoved within 30 days fro* tha date Of this resolution. 6. ae Deputy Secretary to this,�Commissionlshall,) certify to the adoption of t4s Resolution. APPROVED AM ADW.ED D,(I$ 2711 DAY Of,, JA1 PLANNING COMMISSION W THE CI *OF woo CUCNQU- By, 0 Larry 1, NZ910, COMB ATTLST: BraH 9-017er, Upety Secretary Q� I, Brad Buller, Depty Secretary of the Planninj Commis$jon of the Oty of Rancho Cucaw.nga, do'hereby certify that the foreping Rosolutiol, was':61y and regul &rly 'Introduced,,,,"ssed, and adopted by the Plarming Comlssfqn Of the City Of Rancho Cucaw4z, at a r%agular meeting oUt�e Planning Commission held on the 27th day of 1988, by U4 following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMIRTUSSIONERS: NOES: CMISSI&IERS., ABSENT: CommISSIOmERS4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ST"F REPORT j; Ji DATE; January 17, 1986 TO: Chairman and ld Obers of the Planting Commission FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Raul A. Rougeau, City Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment, and General Plan Amendment 88.018 - City of Rancho Cucamonga - A request to amend the Circulation Element of the G64eral plan for the purpose of accomplishing the following change: The realignment of Hillside Road to replace the double interSeF,ion of Hillside Road and Amethyst Avenue with a single intersection At Amethyst Avenue and "a reverse curve to future Klusman Avenue. 1. BACKGROUND: At the City Council meting of December 2, 1987, the Council approved the concept for Hillside Road realignment- and - directed staff to ;;prepare a General Plan Circulatiorx Element Aruendment. The proeased Hillside Alignment will provide a design speed o?r 3O MpH and will eliminate Hillside through traffic from traveling on Amethyst. Construction will occur in the future when the surrounding land is developed. II. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff ha^ completed an Environ+�ntal Assessment o e proposed amendrre t and has determined that there will be no significant environmental-Ampa . ts.. Part I of the Initial Study is attached for your review. III. RECOMMENDATION A is recoaaaended that 'the planning Commission receive pu Tic input regarding this proposal am, if deemed appropriate, recommend approval of the amendment to the City Council. A Resolution is attached providing for such a� recommendation. Res 1 "bpi d 3usse1l aguire ngineer RHM:PAR:pam Attachments: Resolution and Environmental Review Appliicta�ftionE PiosO'sert ym 1f the EIrCUU11tioon Element Hillside Road Realigrxent slap _ , ITEM M 4 1 � , a RESOLUT,KON NO, A RESOLUT OR OF THE PLANNING L" IISMM OF THE CITY CF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. RECOMMENDING AMENDMENr TO THE ADOPTED CIR TION " ELEME NT OF THE RANCHO CKAMDWA !GENERAL PLAN TO ?HE CI � r. COUNCIL WHEREAS, the -,City Council has activ#ed the optional General Piar. Amendment cycle; ind WHEREAI� the Flanlling Commission had held a duty advertised public ' hearing to consider all comments on the proposed General Plan Amindmrnt, NOW, THER E, Be IT RESOL`M, that the Rancho Cucaftnga Planning Commission does hereby recomm ad that the City Council approver the following Amendment to the- circulation elem", t of the General plan. SECT r3N , i,z Figure III -Ss shall be amended to reflect the following cyanges = � The double intersection of llside Road and Amet,kt st .Street be elatniated and replaced by "A single intersection ahu a ravarse: curve between Amethyst Avenue CUM proposed - Kluwasn Avenue. APPROVED AM AMTE01 THIS' 27th,;DAY OF JANUMY, 19M. o PLANNING COt IISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUMNGA ^= BY arry T, , Ma-1 ATTEST: F-U- ni er, cretary E, Brad Buller, weir ,ftacretary of the Ptasning `�Coftission �' ,f'> the City of Rancho G� U2aonga, &CAireby Certify that the for fling Resol gtil ri wet fly and regularly intro-d, passed, and adopted try thi Planning Coq ission' 6f the City of R8Mho Cud nga, at a regular meeting of the Flannir�g : r omission MI _. on the 21th day of Januarys 1988. hy,fihe.followtncg . vcte- to -w #t A YES, CbmISSIONEERSt NOES: CI�Sxi�tiE(tS I) ABSENT: COW.ISSIONERS: J < V _ . .... :: \ M lL STUDY "" P �M �� 7, 1g77 /i ■ti For aid projects requiring enviro"Wmtel raviitww, thii forat mttxC hie'i coa�leted c; and su itted to the Aevalopwt Revicw tt"ittea through the O"artmont wheee the project a+eplicaMA is made. UP" MOO of this mlic Lion, the Planning Division staff will prrvo- Pars' It of the Initial Study and makes recomd madations to Planeiog Loft #on. The P�laft0fi�g Comt,',%IoA will make one Of three deterWiftationt: U "'—' The project will ha+4s W�� Significant envlronaaeastal in�ruaet atnei s i ijf -tine Skclaratioa will be filed, (2) . Tn4 pro <ect will l�ava 4 significant er►vir er t-*1 impact and an bVirwowtal Impact Report" ill be prspan t, or (3) An acMitionatl inforeation ropott: should be supplied by tM app cant giving further inforaaaiion concerning the proposed project. Date Filed�:�,�., Project Title�g.,Igii n t • Applicant's Hama, Address, °Talephonal.__ 4it neho Cu ggnoa, P p 6tax #�37 paynaba c1leamnrtnx iCit t{17 tianYt, Address, Telephone of Person To so Contactad Concerning this Proloctz,,,,, it A sou ».�,_ rfty traffic Pn ^sneer �. -- Rancho Cs�catgorica. P.Q.. ;box S 71 RAncho Cucamonga. CA 91730 �j (714 989 -1862 Location of Project: it f R n ho Cucamon a Hillside Road at and east of L4 Assessor's Parcel. go- *: 1061- 551 -Gi Nisi other pe"Mits necessary frm local, regional*_ state aAd federal agtncigs and the agamcy isettittg such pere,tsnone �= 0 j . E. Proposed use or proposed projecC LP] nLr�hancet the Acreage of project area and square footage of existing and proposed buildings. if arty:. N!A Detcrihe the environmental s tti of the Aro3eect` Jtet.`'ialcluding inforwation on topography. so s a 4�ants �tre►es . land animals. any cultural, historical or scenic aspre s, land user of iu"Ounding properties, md the descripption of any 040169 structure* and their user {attach necessary' sheetS)e �- i I y YS the project part of a larw p"'Jeat. on* of a Series Of cumulative actions, which although individually sAa11, `mad as a wholrt �1ave significant environmental iSlpiCt�Md cbRS,__ tt_uctint ,rsrn� h &1m. A'sArJJo of __ii4ltri+♦u Bna x371 evPnt�ai s► hw Nr.n7 rR ay 11 ir4ev�.rF U4= �ti l,r i) G MULL-THIS EC1',,Z YES tai 1. Create a sub;tajtial tharsge' in�41round contours? 2, Create a smbatantial change in exist %g noise of produce �J vibration o7r: glare? 3. Creati;t a subs iiAl- l chaff jik ?n demand for municipal' I services (police, fire, 'e ¢te ?: sewaga,,etr,.)? X 4. Crenate 'Changes in th_e existing Zoning., or General Plan der,ignations? S. Rertsotie any existing tr.:tas? Now 6. Ceeate the need' for use or :disposal: ar? pgtentially hazardous mats mma ri s., such as toxic subsiancss, flat�iles or ex dslvest ; Explanation of any YES answerer, above (attach additional' �r���ts if race n aary3 = General nan CiCcula't �'t)t ement c ante is rsG�rse& Eutaia tins tree will be affected th& nt -kway of the or000sad ��6�•anen� t� �, ` T. Estimate the am qqt of sewage tho" solid waste raatsrWi this prr'3ect will generate daily:_ 40, 8: Estimate' the: number of auto lad try trips generated daily by project:, -;mjv new triosiwil`f be generated #av the rearidh � Estimate th's amount of 9�ading (cutting and fill #a�g� -,r it far dais r ; pr )ject= in cubic yards L 10. If the project involvds the cOnstr4ition of residential unite= omplaA ;J a the form on the next page. � r 1 CERTIFICATION: I h*reby certify that the °st&trM6,js fu rry #shad � � ebova �'and in the attached extaibit� Ri'eseeat the data and information~ required for his initial "Aluati0h to`thf--"�$st of my ability, and that tke fasts, stat"411s, and information presented' are rue and correct tor, the best of my knowledge and belief. • I further dhdarstawV that additional i4ormati'oh ma�'~ b ' r( uirgd to be siftitted before ah; adetquaate evaivation can `be, made day the Planning i� Division.r� - � \ � Date: „ 1 -6 -89 Signet' cue , i #�l! Si ty Traffic Engineer µ - RESID DIAL COS!5 Ci F4h The follow - WOM, a d be,,Oravided to tip iii, tf Raftpha cue sr�a AlanAin! Otvision, few grdbir to aid the spool distri":ii iro assessing their ability to acCO oodate the prmsed,residegtial deveIoptaent.. Deve'lopersV,are ree.� aired to secure letters frost ttu� �choat .dixtr•ict, fort etc xsdst #n the, irtreasad'numar oi",sttsder►ts prior~ to issuanGe ofuildinq dieYftlits, r, e� liar of Developer and `%tatfve 'iract Ho. :* fspeloific lacat :-protect. PIiAS T t E 2 PHASE 3 MASE 4 [d7 i, dumber of single family utrit4 _ 1 2. Mustbor mwt�tiple family .unite: o, _._.,..... �..,.,:: o..r._. 3. Date proposecto, begin zartstroctirtn: .+,. J 4e 2arlie%�,date of ,� v occupancy- r tiasEel4 t, and # of ,T'4itiyiw � �� , � = C. ar. ' Eiedrt3+x� Rr1ta etatiatt } � ` � U jC - • rtr'�ss a t4 h Grove ;��v � a• �' �� � a ' `t, �.. �� biker y � ! 1 K i aran�bald - Turner � s r ;, ,Haven 6 Ctpxeta al �, R� i� s � r M,Ihkprt j ! e � C i ra+� Om t Off - � � „ ' im j m fi. 83bRf ,rz ! CRtnkirRn Qrt�iClRtR _ c � .� T Tot of i cn ivxt,*m qL —as as a y`t . vRr7¢R ■.: •WwpIR10k rwrry A 9 (+ 1 Ap In ffiffiffiALBRIffi44 f IF glrbynnr - - RN } �• � �i � � }� /f t:' - �•e I � ��j i� - s — �T{Ji � p ffi to in LP r- r a p m .t Q1t p 4 r m t'.� �i 0 A .� t ..t _ C'• r rn 14 Fm n' 1 ` - QTY OF RANCHO CUC A�i1C NGA STAFF DATE* January 27, 19M r� TO: Chairnia+ and hers of the i�lIinnin9 omt ss on s FROR Barrye R. Hanson, S61ior Civil Bngi�;er BY: Joe Stofa, Jr.', Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: IAddification to Conditions of A royal of 'tract 12671 Lewis 1 Homes - A request to rtmdify the Conditioni of Approval to Tons ruct a sig�riaed Intersection at Base tine Road and Milliken Avenue f I. ABSTRACT: Staff Is requesting :the sdditiorr of a Condition of Approval to previously opproved Tekative tvact'No. 1267L requiring the construction of a trWa ,,,iIgeal at the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Base Lino- Road. i Ti. BACKGROUND Tentative Tract No. 12671 was originally. approved by tfe Planning Caraissian on August 13, 1986. The city Council approvi a addition of the signal condition % "in concept" on January 6,,-,19 111. ANALYSIS: .ewis Homes, the Oveloper of Bract 12671, is in the final stage of construction of Mil!jiken Avenue between, Base Line R04 and Terra Vista Parkway. This cgostruction will co �iate the intersection of Baseline Road and Millike l Avenue, which is n6i a -IT" with no south leg. It „ would not be prud d nt to open the fourth leg of the intersection unless -a signal is instal pd. A signal project for °Unis intersection as to be included in the', 2111 dggt- proposer) for 1988 -89 Fiscal Year, and`�;S,the j intent of the gineering Division to keep the fourth leg (bf-'the intersection clri until that signal was 'in operation. It is row the disire of the. developer to open 'he intersection prior to the earliest doge that the city project `.i ouId be completed in M4rch, „a 1989. In order.lio obtain the - signal earlier than that, it must be built as apart of th j completion ` f the intersection, thus must be apart -if requirement' set forth. in the Co¢ditions of Approval of the Tract 12671 which is o cowletg,,Milliken Avenue at Base Line head. A copy of the present c nditior."_J approval affecting Milliken Avenue are a attached, �\ IT4k A J PtAR 3Nt`a Ct3MMIS5IQR! STAFF REPORT ' Trac� 3,2fi7i - i.ewis Iiorn'c:s ;_ ,, \\ 1 January 27, 1988 l Page 2 lV� ' Even though thissig4�wnuld become a requirement`�f the development of Tract 12671s the-signal is included in the three -y * program of capital improvements and was to be proposed; in the 1:;38849 fiscal year' budget &-s a project budgeted from the System Develomnent fund. it is therefore, staff Is recomiendation ^ghat the developer be permitted to open Milliken Avenue at'an early, date by constructing the .Base line- Milliken.TrOfic ,- Signal in;cdnjunctioa with the xtreet,improvements and that the cost of the signal be offset Tay credits against tha developer's System Development Fees, LAY. RECQI+Ii' ENDATIOR: Staff recommends that the �'PTanning Commission 'approve e bttached' resolution providing for„ the inclusion of construction �jt a, traffic 1 signal at the intersectiatt of Base line Ppad and M1114ken Avenue in the Conditions of Approval of Tra'et42671 and that the .cost of the signal be '1 offrat,by credits against the Meioper's Systetm Development Fees. Respectfully submitted, S rrye R. Hanson Senior Civil Engineer ✓r BR.H:JS:sd Attachments: Vicinity Map (Exhibit "A") Project /Street Status (Exhibit "B"), 'tentative Ma (i xhibit "C ") Resolution and Reoommended Condition:; of oval.,. AL- r c, k, LEGEND: i PROJECT STATUS / ;i it Process f Pb Approved &ec:,rded Firaied STREET STATUS ssaTn x , ag Pavement llr`ReRuired for this Project CITY OF PROJECT.-T71267L RANCHO CUCAMO A TITLE: -EMM ENGIMEERING DIVISIO14 EXHMITs °i G <. AREA DKVXLOPMNMT nom T4MTATIVS TRACT NO. 12671 Sig TlN Ctrt N1A /WNiCMCAWNJE CCWR" Or can tiiiaic" rrAtr N V,%U$"Mf.S raaw bta awe °" tics w 4440 cf. aeaN 0" of oa r�MLriair }f - >: � `•. �au uNr i taxrav�naraascic.rrs» �''=�: � • a : '� , +�.. , �, j ! i t:t � reA.r is �seM ` s+1h►,� mow: ,.r +•� ._, _ � !'A�as \fit•, `�"`� .�'' •;1!` ' �'�`�Kfrlr�:a�» � +�_ _ � f 4 G II� ' I tip. ` AI-. " RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF �CHO CUCA lGA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO.`12671,D Z ATED AT THE NORTW�S T COMER OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND MOUNTAIN VIEW DRIVER THIN T"! TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY u A. Recitals. (i) Lewis Homes has filed an applxck�� for the approval of ,, 1 Tentative Tract Map to. 12671 as described is A . \�tle of this Resolution« J Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tenta le)Tract Map request is referred to „as "the applitinn ". 00 On the 27th of January, # the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly n%iced public hearing on the application and-�mieludad saidhearing on th t date, (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution o have occurred. ) B. Resolution. - NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved !,y the J Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows. 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all'of the facts set forth in the Recitals] Part A, of this ResolutioA are true and correct. ti 2. -Based upon s bstantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on January v, 1988, including written and oral staff repor ® together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specific`*finds as follows: (a) 7a'2 =Dplica ion applies to prop�ty located at }tho northwest corner of MiVII,cn Avenue and Mountain View Drive within the Terra vista Planned Community. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings f facts set forth in paragraph I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds a% concludes as followst (a) That tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and 0 (b) The design or improv nts of the tentative tract is consistent jth the General Plan, Development Code, an pecific plans; and tiff RESOGUTa1E4 FAGt 2 (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed, and (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause_suhstantial environ"liota'l damage and (� avoidible n�ury to humans acid wildlife or their habi�at, and „ e) The tentative tract is not likely o, cause � �L serious public health problems; 4 td (f) The desi4a of the tentative, tract wi'7 not , conflict with aas nt kquired by the public at W94, now of mcord, for access through or use of the property within the „ proposed subdivision. 4. This OWssion hereby finds and certifies that the proje t has been reviewed and coi�.i Bred in compliance with the California EnvironM ntaf Quality Act of 2970 Ads, further, this Commission hl,.�,y issues a Regan a Declaration. h 5. Based upon the fitdingS and conclusiosS set forth in par* 'raph ?t I, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subje 0 each and every condition set forth below, t, Tentative Tract: fl, I. The tract shall be subject to all ;conditions set forth in Resolution No. 1$417 approvW'on,August 15, 2986. c . v 2. A traffic si Inal steal be construt :ted at tWMil-liken _ Avenue and Use Line Koid intersection prior to opening the south Milliken Av;Ze leg to traffic. If the Developer constructs the sign ,� its design and construction cost shall be eligible far credit against the Developer's Systems Developmen ees. 6. the Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the j adoption of this Resolution. c:7 J n Ci _ RESOLUTION ( j PAGE 3 J RPPROVEO AND AWPTED THIS 27T DAY OF JANUARY, 1988. ['BANNING CO MISSION D ENE C TY'OF RANCHC+ CUCA10GA BY: Larry CN , Chairman " rralluyler, Uoputy secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secre ry of the-Planning Comission of the City cf Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby ct ify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passod+ -: aad adopted by. than Planni 9 Cr Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF RNAPORT tiAi£; January 27, 1986 .r _El � : fit TO., Chairman and Members of the P'fannirg Commission FR(N: Brad jaieer, City Planpaor - BY; Beverly Hissd!n, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENYIR0) itTA1 ASS "aSWIT AW TENTATIVE TRACT12895 ,R. INVE41 -M S "—i�2 9 eve ojmen on acre s` —rand in the M04i m Residential 04strict':f$ -.14 dwelling units per acrek)lacated can the rrt side of Baker Aveoup, south of Foothill s ulevard - APW,, ?. .581 -57, 58 and 207- 571 -79. I. PRWECT AND SITE DESCRIPTtDNt i A. Action ReWesied: Mproval, of the subdivision., ip, site plai, . elevations, conceptual grading plan, Tree Real PermjYu 8$.D2 and issuance of a Negative Declaeratioh. B. Pr-,tiect Density: .10.96 dwelling units per acre i C. Surroundin land. Use and Zoning; 31or"t'ii""'. - QW an'd �ou` `rn Pacific Railroad; - Medium Rest,' 4tial (8 -14 duelling units per acre) South - Single family residential; Medium Residential 0 -14 dwellieZ, units per acre) o East - Townhoo.�And wo,ile home ,park; Medium Residential (8.14 dwelling 4hits per acre) and Low4*divai Residential (4. -8 dwelling units per acrd) =< West Single fully residential.; low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) D. General Plan aesi nations: roj vac M041UN Residential iS -14 dwelling units :per acre? Jt,rth Medium Residentie (8 -14 dwelling unftl�Oer acrc) South - Medivast.Residential lt'44 dwelling units per acre) East- tded.�irRasfdenti,( 14 dwelling units per acre? ,anal tow- M0,afuN Residential (4.8 duelling units per acre) Best -' l:bw Residential i2 -4 dwelling units per acrel \k ». mite Characteristics: The pra4ect °site is va ht r� slopes to tha sou%lasir —W -U grade. -The siie As travey, /d' frog Aorth to south by an inter4ittent stream and contains fine (5) Wkk'ture California sycamore and four M Eucalyptus trees.` A potentially i�arctive taut -t: seQW1,1t exists ire the-northwest corner, ITE14 ti� ? P.,ANNING COMISSION STAFF REPORT � ri 12 095 - R. J. Investments: January 27, 1934 tr Page 2 YI. ANAi.vsisc A. Bar" raund The project wits previously granted. Planning to"issioli ' dept ovate February 13, �6Ass. Sint -e that titttn, tho, applicant t,,a�i,. �• proc+eeded with the project up-,to the point of obtaining building permits. The "" applicant did not continue beyond this stage _anal, according to the St=andard Conditions of Approval, t�+, project expired on February 13, ,_1067. At this 'tite tW-applif -at is rt,submitting essentially the 4 m a prrejectR as was` approved n .1585 wi�*W only a few minor charges. B. General, . The proposed develcpwert consists; .chi 99 townb mes with a ne 'density of approximately 1� dwelling - "units per acre. The proposed -unit sid=e ratng;as from 027_,squars feet � 1,1 ;7 square feet. Mo#s, of the units are grouped into #our- plexas3.z fiFedpiexes Ground double loaded parking courts. One - story duplex bi3a� 11,dre providaO adjacent to the single family"homes _ t-jr the density transition. Both thg one -story dup,3exes and tW1WQ-Sto►y townhomes are of contemporarj styli orchitiKture,. A lightweight ; - J` concrate the roof add stucco walls kith colored trig have been Proposed. All units are equipped wi#t s�ar' panels as required: The recreation area is .centrally locate it with $reenway linkages throughout the site. the main access to the project is provided' on Baker.. Avenue with two emergency acc saes t�trough, Fernleaf Drive and Via Carillo Lane.' Each unit has a�two caY `Jj' ` w;th, 46 parking spaces and 1 handicapped space pr vtided for.`�est jc.*ing. The developer is proposing to install masonry, walls with dense landscaping around they property hoondar16 -. ,;The developer should obtain authorizat ;,on from the property owners on thr. wort side to replace their wood fence with a shared bleck wall, E _ -: C. Design Revi�s Ca00ittee• The Design Review Cown.txe ,(Tolstoy, raw o etaa rev "u d the proposal on Jat±u3ry reco=ended apps -6*11 subje t to thti fallowing conditions: 1.. Patio fenrlig along ,baker, ;Avenue should be, upgraded °to masonry. -2. St1cc0 Over Wood window trig should se, provided on all , elevations. he eloper has agreed io,cwply with these C�44itiok and has Arovided a revised concoptua, s4trh, of t,p Pa Me icetming along. Baker O. 'Tec6nical Review Committee.- .'the project was reviewed and.app by t e " ec h ca, ex ew olm a on January 54 3988,., PLAP:NINS ?)QMISS ON STAFF REPORT x!',12$15 - R. J, Investments ' .Ijry 27, 1938 Page ,3 E. Trdi Removal Permit: Associated with the development of the .tract, X"e aP.PTIcauMitted a tree removal permit requesting- the , removal of 4 Eucalyptus and i *c'-rnoreY with # deveTopment SJf the tract *qr. —ding and improvements), Prex+arbWon- of the trees is ,not practical. T'herefotie, staff recce_ -.,nds gel oval of the trues. `• '.in keePing with the policy of the Tree Preservation hrdiMnco. the trees Oust be rer)aced -,.pith the largest specimen size available as determined lty the City Planner, or Plerning Co ission. The remaining trees (4 California Sycamore) are, to, be- ,pret4rveo. F. Environmental As5uStNelit: Part I Of tho Initial Study- hfs" beer cep e- y app-meant and staff has cowplete(l Fart II of the Enviro)k'Wental Checklist. A supplebmentai fault investigation, study was done -Jo conjunction with the. Initial study was dupe in cc *ljuncti,04' with the initial develop, "t pleas_ (bR 8400.' The stuff identified that a prokentially. active f ilt �R"gnt located at, the northwest corner of the site co0d es use 0 l;e. or P p pro erty is - , geologic ) hazard, At the time of the , prolous subaait�* a R oth:r environmental imo4cts identified by sir ff were; A ±aT of one naLr'e Sycamore tree And four Eucalyptus ,trftss intensity of land use (I0.96 dwelling units per acre) and 41fffarences in neighborhood character In terms of design, scale, blflk and height;. The develOper has incorporated all the identified Aftigatiom',Pleasures into `Gh €s proposed project through the ;following: Providing a buildlnq setback of 20 feet frow the faua t segment; 2. Providing additional sail and foundation re orts f� P review and approval p1<;or, to issuance,.,of buildYllg>permits,I S. Romoval of only one mature Sycamore tr6 \, %Kd providing- new tree varieties per City Standards for numb+ 'and sizes; and 4. Providing one -story duplex units Qn the west side of the property to provide as density transition. Based upon this. FOview, staff determined that although the proposed project could have a significant impact on the eavironment, .there will not be any significant impacts in this case, because the mitigation Measur& described have been IncoroorAed into the project through Conditions of Appropsal. M. FACTS FC1R FINDINGS, i`''re y,,�oject is consistent ri #th thR General, Ptah and 1e� eve opmeq �oae.7 W project, vAtWihe adde4 Mftigxtion 1"ASsM, w�il1 not be detrimenta,- to the pdtil €c health or, (2tfE#y, or eau e ut s9nn €Site p adverse eii i'Vacts. i�n Addition, tie OHP,0 Id are a site plane togotiter wi cirhe reco ended Conditions of are In compliance wit the app.' jc�ale provisions �f the'i)®veltilp�rprtot �e 7 and City S-rtand4rd -S ° �PM''NIN6' C€ WISVvOM STAFF; RE ORTI " TT 128W- R. Jf. xoyesteu'nts tiun ry 27� I , .,: page 4 IV. CORRESP09DENCE: ThiS., has been advartised as`as pualiC hearing in The ne�cspapar and .,notices Were ant = to a 1 property owMers wi t i 1 of qr0� si t1l. V. RECiDiYtIC: Staff raG3nd: ti;Wt the Planning Coerasixsdel `approve . - > IWj i"ve -TF"' 112895 Through adoption of C attached Resqdutioaj" of pproa: �63th Conditions,eii Rvai ?ern�it 8802: a isaua,a �3ctiv Dec" rAtio"I Res fully j Sr City lanner 1 "f AttdCl9pia►8t53 Planning Cownful on Minutes of Fobeuar�y , 1985 ExhibiVWa .. Site Utilization, PAP Exhibit "B" - Mitural F aturY� liap 4, Exhibit "C" • Tentative react flop Exhibit "a" - Site plan, Exbibi ,'" " - Coe3ogtual Grading plat €xhibit� "F" s Tre smoval Exhibit IV - PmIrtHfKA �.f Lemscapa Plan Exhibf� "H', * Suilding Plevati©ns Res€ vtiop,,, of Approval wi "iCpndi tfaf e D oFs utity shall be posted and an agreement executed i.0.; the ai$ s AOL Ctim =o?i Cit Engineer and., City Attorney ". tip, further s1a�ed that a applicant hat! reques , a alarifiaition' of. condition C -7 concerni undergrounding of utility l es "and staff recommended the addition of l e stating "except along 'high A'Veaue ". Chairman Stout (;pd the<,publle !Searing. pain Byrnes, Hhriboro Hamoi adtdsed t t1he projeot would aeot be required to do any improvGmetta t Highland Ave +d as it is future freMY right -ot -wag and had requester c arifio n of t caondition. There flare nA firth!sr arstore the puirlic hearer was closed. Chairman Stout stated ftha.i: Was i propri --W to requlra the urfdorgroundisg =•:'> on Hig11and and mould mgr , ;Pith the ndments proposed by state. Motion: Akv by Sto , ,sewed bj, Rempe cw rled, to adopt this Resolution Approvirg PAry 1, Ila 8557 vith amendmonts Eng�arin$ Conditions 9-2 to mtatl "roe , ' et . se ty aha+lll b9 posted c,,A, went axeCi'ted to tre satisfaction of ' e City+ Sngi.nee» and City? Attorn n; and C -7 to stmt% Iexoept along t?fghXatld venue". AMS. GOK4ZSSj RS -'r. STOLrr, REmPEL, .MCNI'EL � MOSS: ConutaxOtmast MORE 4 ENT: C04MISS1tkiERS: 'BARKER - serried f K. EaV2R0NMWrAL ASSEWHENT AND TENTATIVE TRA_", GT_ � _1695 -�- N.J. INVESTMENT-.S J A i total raaideaitiaY dint99�.Apmet�t es! 99 i:owniiomas oa ;.03 sores sai Tarr in :st:e Medium Re.*ridentiax 'Distriot (8 -14 du /ac), loo %ted oti tht Kest side of' Raker Avenue-, south of Foothill Boulevard -, A?% 207- 581r -57, 58, 2�T -571- 73 aNancy Fong, Assistant Planner,, raViewed the staff report. r Chaiman StQ ";t openai: the public hearing. Bard {r Stroxiep, 3151 AirWel, Costa Mesa, overviewed revisers preje ct , design, Henry et¢y, 6326 Forest Grove, Rar hz Cucamonga, stated concerns vtth the loss of prl aoy, trarfic impauts and .Baker Avenue, and impacts on,proporty.values. Don Olsen, 8435 Autumn Lei , Ranaho.Cucamonga, stated that this design was a f tremendous improvement over the original design; bowever, had concerns with the location of garages facing Levan CroVa, Planning Vommission Minutes. -8- FAbruary 13, 1995 ( \ :there were urtheaosenis ,_,ti2ezea�e_ti��s_p�blta haRrin as cloedf'� ~' Commissioner .McNiel stated that this project had case a long way, its orignal desiA, and appreciated what the applicant had done. Commissioner Chitie4 6greod and ateted that the applicant had liztened�to the concerns of adjaf'_ ," 'idents And the Co=iosion `in tbo dr skv of this project.: �� 1 Chairman Stout stated that ¢`.is project ad €',vesses all r6ncerna expressed dur. ng review of the orizinal��4,loject and is . good 'ex8mp� of how an infill project can wonk., Commissioner Tempel adv 0s 4 that landscaping viii u4ff%r the garage units from adjacent existing homes. Motion: Moved by Reaspelx aaconde& by Chitiear oar4iidr to issue a Negative 1v;clavation and %lopt bhs Resolution approVing Teatati re Traot 12895. AYES, GO!hHI83IONBRS, i1 EL, GHITIEA, 1,,0 L STOUT NOES:FffiiISSONPRS: ":101tf: "SENT: CO :txonfls: BAWR arried r eaaa�t EtNIRONt3ENTAL ASSESSMFUT,,AN6 f�[MRia,. PLAN AWNDMK 5.02 - An amendmett to the Public Health and Safely Element to provide ocnsiateney with State Provisions of the Alcpuia 'ri*I* Act, ab am sd. Dan Calema Senior Planner, reviewed the staff part. Chairman Stoat o aed the public hearing. There were no comments, there6ro the p 1c, hearing was clased._ Chairman S ".gut re4olate t t t languago .requiring a seller to 1�tify potential purchasers of rope when it is in the AlquistPriolo ;Special Study sons included not ly, Resolution,: but in the General PT= text as well. Motion. Moved by Chit , seconded-by $to carried, to adop� ')the Resol'iAtion recommending approval vener 1 Plan Amer eAne 85 -02 to the City Coliaoi2. AYES. WISSIONE CRUMA, ST , MCNIEL, UNP1BG WES: COMMISSiow, NONE: ABSENT. �� CONISSIONERst BARMn - carries Pl ,) C�rsission Minutes «9- kabraary r 1985 Pftoc Lot, xrsNAC 133 MOM., not IT ox C01119BMOAC t`• • �° r ..�� foal • ii .,/' 'm 9 v 3T011M1 y. rt 450 AC. 1 p ! '% r`��JPACLNIT LCCCC_` , � - * q♦ n..sw*.r a t.ww• '� �•.n • v7 � s i +. 'V * r � M �wF4h• a yam,.. ANNA c Ilr it • '� + NP♦tt w..�l. y ° .. M+s Apf 1RM 4 19 +M�' 11 'P ,1� - - YAF+±RF LAU ' w OD OR am CITY CF, �;; a w » � ®• • '�•�• Off:'• O (. F2ttt;.� ii .0 • . �. � M � f p tllUD CU CA TITLE,- 1" PLANtvtiU D(w EXHIBIT. S`Cr1L• - -- pbrLot ' tie 1� •- r ��`ad i � tP N6N A:' �� ((�k n�Mii � _4011!!BM(ACy �w ` 1 m 4 m� 3TOINMIt y. ' Y " ; (06i ,a rt 450 AC. P �*+ " . irat ram a A s.w+u O i.. • p ' V.. b p �'. � � � Art MwN '. fib � � • 6 L + NP♦" �.M11. ` ..4,Txi INYf I.M. f ♦ e any�� � , p' M i m7 � � A e•a 4 i( �' • b 1: � �6 ! - �' G ` � �`� a ItP••'" r ° l� .�,1� alfl Aaa �. �.� ( +M�'�11 YAei&#tF , rr ` i . t ris" . , I.. Aryy...- IAey Ah I,•, _:. P i t ` ... �y 7 I...6. Ri ow. }! N CITY CF, t�l CUCAI TITLE? KANNiN4G t?(WI EXHIMT. 1 � iW •�biv - A 1 �fri �..�� Rrr . -�i +� rRr'M fw�►r r _wep- *� f ►� � , - i{.` -x _7ssar. r.+"ra_ r"f'i •�n . aww _""�' � t.•., i 3 C' j - 3, a (k ix ITEi t di�F ,RANU 0 CUCAN TITLE- P el1V4 I3€"N' Paf EXHIBIT-. 9 AGf= � _ ���r ✓ `` ts�tawi iv6�samia�, \ ...nom' .^� '9 �.. _ 1, Ll jI Acat�o fam � 3 /� E 11• frfarufsrfw !�r f.. � t N t� + .�T eanw.r. f+nifaw. Mr• _ x�r}+ {y R.,.A. \NING DIVA ,� 1 EXHIBtTM - . r SC.:A 1Z 0-/o { 13 WH CITY OF R['8i1HO C uc k im oNGA '['I'iI t i e I" SCAM � Y t y -a, mats, e* •1��#' orj -��i r ' lU: .6w1' � J -�•. � aAY y f Ir- til l S Q e I N . I Pit Y cc, RANCHO CLTCAjNjOW KAi+1cWiI`d'G DIV M FXHIB% ` '° ALE= L'. y }Ri R , h ■ " A7 CITY CF RA-NCP--j,- CUCAMONUA RANMNUI -A �' mv- D� o � SCALE- 4. 1 RESOLUT ON NO, A` K"5 UTION OF 'THE PLANkYK COMMI5SIO)i OF THE CITY � i . 0-4CNO CUCAMONGA APPRUYIN TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. AF 7 DX SIGN 'REVIEW THEREOF, IV, E UEYgLOPWNT OF, 99 Tokg_ tfO �S SIN 9.03 ACES OF LANA IN THE W IUM RESIA£taTIAL OISTRICf, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ON' R AVENUE, SOi%- OF FOUTNILL OCOJLEVARD • APN.- 207-6817$7,.58 and 247.571 "> 79. A. fit.. ita, ls. C =} R. 4. Investiints has f led an ap, i3cation for the apprL�1 of Tentative Tract lap' no. ,12895 ono design review thereof as ctescrrfbed' in Z. 4 title Of 613 Aesolutipn. H$rainafter in; th$ Resolution, subject Tentative `exact Map request is referred to as `the application" € 3 n the 27th of '4an";,Y 1988, t . pig 441no Cs iss on -- t�hQ City of Rancho tucamon conducted °a duly note, �Uti� - hearing `0,1 the application and ponclud,, ` said tearing on date. = tiiil Air lsgal prerequisites to the adoption 0 this Resolution f have dCCldrrad, B, U� �ri¢7► ' i t NOW, THEREFORE, It fs hereby found, determined 'and the Planning Co.wissio" of the City of Rancho Cucaoaeonga as fcllaws *C- 1, This Cae�i:xtiO 'hereby 041,iflf ally finds 'brat all of t`�e facts set fa,.th ire the :: �. a1,, Part, A, of tkt7` , neeulutioa are true and correct. eased upon substantial- f4viddikV - prese7tetElho this c i?.�ion durl,g the abovemrfferented public hr+arf;'Rg on January 2Y, 196$, includ gritted and oral staff reports, 0geth.tr, with public testimony, this COWISsion hereby speci;fi6olly finds as foyj��,, (a) The oil iicatf�in Applies to property located on the west side, 5of maker Avenue, ._95D feet south of, Foothill Boulevard and is presently (b) `ihe.; property to =her north fs design for residential uses and i5 developed with townhouses�,the property to the south is designated ' for residential uses and is developed with single faxily_ homes, the property' to the 't t - sf na d "for re ,,identI4 uses ,and is developed with townhouses A O a mobile 'how ark an� the rdpart' for residential uses and ;s. developed Kith single a,{ td desiiiateQ L f 4J {c} The project wfth the recomnded Conditions of Approval, compl €es with all minims develapatUnt standards„ df the City Of Rancho Cucamonga, and J ��°j //� Le+ �/ ,7 ty c r s: o PLAINHI & CONNISSIOR R #SCLutjog ga. IT 47 5 a Inver r = f� Pale 2 " id) The developw't of 99 taAhoetes on 9.03 acres sf land is consiotemt wi!� the Medium Residential land - use 4*51gr+z IP" of the General plan, and y tel buildfl g sotbsck Of 20 f0t ,fr6* the- fault segment has seen provided consistent With the geologic rtport ,pr* pared "pursuant to the guidelt:nes of Special 5tudi�s U-_11 �, end -, � f} Additional soil anal foundation lipor'cs arp. to ba provided fpr r-as+ier and appr vat "prior to the issuance of -, buiIding psi"; and" fg only one rnststr Sysaore tisa+a is +ar og.:ved and rwplacexent trees per V4 Staindards shall 4, pro. ided -,. and (h)." One story plex units fav� b ,.-n provided on t�e,west side dwellings. rt r tcs pravide a ` iensi Y' trans -tion to ex y irtg sllag'1e f "sly , BaseO urn the suir�z an¢cial eYiderice presented to this Cok"ission during the above -'W* &,need public, .*aring and upo_q: the specific findings of facts set forth In paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Cb��Ission hereby finds and concludes a� follo;es: : (a) :°That tentative tract is cpnsistgnt with tiuuE General Plan, Nvelapment i.ode, 'and specsfa plans; and W The design or Improvement&, of the tentative `1 tract Is consistent with the wieners Plan, Devel oprxaw Code, and specific plans: and fc3 The si is physically suitable for the dsvelopsent proposed;, and hype of J (41 fihe design of the subdivision is not .likely cause substantial enviropar�ntal `4aaaage �Cnd avoidable injury to, hmns and wildlife'' or ti their hibitatl and ,fit ( t� t•�. (e) The totity' tract` is not l`i,kely, to cause �u serious public health problems; andC.r 4f? The design of the tentative tract will,, - -not' conflict with any easement acquired ,b,' t* _ c i:ubliv at =lafge, rig of record, for access through or use of .tithe property olthin tt proposed subdivision. � AAL 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies $fiat tfea project PiaS bean reviewe4 and cor;: f'' err compliance with the I L."Irnis Environmental - Guai i,� Sect of 147t? r� --further this Commission = lrer46yr .5ss ea i;gati ve, Leclration,'` cj a �CANNr�lC, - a January 27, '1958 page 3 5, Based !d, t* findingsr ;tnd ranclustions -set forth in paeagra,Iph I, 2 and 3 abc�ve�? t#�)`'� c mission ho by .approver the application subject tcA e Fr and ev�,�y r`e , on set forth ,.glow and in the attactw -d Standard Conditions atta^h reto.and irzorporated herein, this reference: Tract Kap 12895 Cg} An in-1ie }, fee $" contributie) .. t \ the future'- uiidergroundin > of` sire existing, rovirkoad utilities (telecPAunicA T-6b 'and eieciri cal )., on he opposite side of Aker weivi shall be paid t�tir6 City prior ;%d`a're Issuance" of. building permits. '•,'cite fee shall be l "te_hai`f tFre ci'4 ac(opted rrnit allw,,`Ofit times the l lengO of the' project Crontar)e: ` A ) A per?rt<it will be required froet Southern Paa3fic' jai trosct for any work w.lthi n their righr; »cif -way. „ C3) Theptot5vaf=- ilaser.Plan Stott ilrairt, ire 365 from ?, + << the , Southern pacific Railroad to raker Avenue including a debris basin at the north rn ehtp;nce P shall be constructed., to "the satis�cti % of <the'City 2ngigeer.� The developer shall, be ` O E credit andlar rttioursement of draiRai igible for e fe" per City Ordinance ftcsi,�r? Review C1! The perimeter wall of the project shall be of decorative masonr, material. The developer shall �. r� obta authjriza inn from tip westerly properjy owners to replace the existing woad ff"e withGa shared usonry wail. The plans shall `De revio*d and', approved prior to whe ” issuance of - gradjtrg permits. (2) Spe,«al decccratixe wall treatment,} such j as indentations, reveals, raised planters, grid ka?Wscaping shall he providad to the westerly cul- de -sac -- Feroleaf Drive, Ricardo Drive and Via Carillo Avenue. Details of such treatment shall "be --In included thy�fina�, landscape ,dnd grading cplan which shall be` reviewed and approved by tta Cite �i Planner prior to the issuance of bu�jding permits. l Wrl, Details and cross sections cf all 0security Dates art$: the t,4a emergency accesses shall be shitted to, the' pianninc DiyiSion, Foothill,, Fire District, and � Sheriff's Department° for review and approval prior ptio issuance of building permits. A co s - iaanrsi qned off by the Fire District an �Shwiff s tmeAt shall bra submitted and kept on file with the project, o �, Ya _ _PLAiltET1�6f_.f�iISSIfiiL _ ... TT 12898 - R. J. IMSttasnts January 27, 198$ <7 -pag/ - t." 1, Ci 1i (4) Contiguous dense landscaping shall bo provided along all propo ;1y boundaries. yThis -thMl be incorporated into the final lands"Irpe slat which shall be reviewed and approved by the -.City planner prior. to the. issuance' of building pv%iits. (5) The � o�ecst entrance'; taker Avenue shall iocltidt 3 Sycaatyrat tmes to be c Wni size of 6" box. This shall "�bc morpgratiWd int3 the final (`andscape n: plan WIVch \`�Ull .be "reviewed and approved by the MY. Planne prior to tht. issuance of building, Lt- �. per�itsv A \ \ \\\ (6) Devils -and crr ss secti�,olYS of the roof sh9win�� the E solar panels shall be i.ncl r.4ed in the build,164 V ans and shall be reviewed and «Ioprov1.d by the Planning Division ' price to - the :"issc to ,of '.building peralts. All roof mounted solar panels" shall bs archit;2cturally screened wherever feasible. (7) Al* - f'en�e heights Ancludincg the retiinim wall port~ aq shall not ,exceed 'a taxi of" nitze .191, €eet.�- 8) _Me five trees to be m4oved shall) be replaced with the largest nursery grown stack °available as f/ determined'.by the City Plattner. (9) Patio fencing along Baker Avenue shall rie decorative' masonry. b 6. The Deputy secretary to this'tomaicsion shall certify to the �' o adoptioft of this Resolution. k„ APPROVED THIS RI-TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1988. " PLANNING CU.4,PjI$SION OF THE CITY OF RRKHO CUCA14ONGA BY: arry v Ad�-e , m a rtaan ATTEST:_ : Deputy re Wry- Brad er, p It 1 s �y1 O(�..YNq Ca.�tls pYU. A V A EI YwM� �0 vb`pC,Y - •V Or VY N_� Y •pjpr 4. a'4iN.r q µ Cpq~ qp �1d yq My wN •S Lit �"C( ��� (, �y�C�y�Ri �YL� �iW+�pVy .pY}�VY P��V M ♦ - •. ts- 1� M" OCC 4 Rw1.` 7¢r ii y u 111 YX..S3 III �ySs, _ 0. �•.r �s s'8�tr�. �'qd�S' i�a��'M �;�'.` lE�x�Nw �p� i���iF _ ... Yi iwVi�09.7�NYNi� �V� �w G4� iNw. rbi7 +COi6Ai ��I�L iri y ,, q$ M M I If I Y�r 4 rr A+ L q 1� �iR �1+ Mq i4 9pV �waw�� 'yY YNC)�C f i7ir M, i:. { y> YVVV LS 34 lay y its �444YjY y- np M L fie-- i$ :wq A� � a L` re'ymu gS as a 6 1' -lift om} ®g i"YI . NR, Trj' [f�1a 011 M±S H1+ All M1.9�J.� ii :iFM ICY �i �� v J R: €8 N �! ► L y. �jg (✓' ANC» R; ,'1''-` ^ C` L I"1� y NYC. 14 s L L fJSYi ,ty1 =Y.j]' Y IDgos Y Y L i.1 IN C ` My 01 G.rhs NL ti j Wit al.". b,4 €" N -za C �wir fy�Nr�rw wpYLq wycu '3 A -1 � 1 hwY M 1j _Jfy lb u � 0 C{ $E der �4 JJJ Y n °ua { y> YVVV LS 34 lay y its �444YjY y- np M L fie-- i$ :wq A� � a L` re'ymu gS as a 6 1' -lift om} ®g i"YI . NR, Trj' [f�1a 011 M±S H1+ All M1.9�J.� ii :iFM ICY �i �� v J R: €8 N �! ► L y. �jg (✓' ANC» R; ,'1''-` ^ C` L I"1� y NYC. 14 s L L fJSYi ,ty1 =Y.j]' Y IDgos Y Y L i.1 IN C ` My 01 G.rhs NL ti j Wit al.". b,4 €" N -za C �wir fy�Nr�rw wpYLq wycu '3 A -1 � 1 hwY M 1j _Jfy M••'S 0. rte♦ M �fi '�� Nti..r gyY��i�q, a o$�yq « -} YVY9NdCY$ .� w '' .yRw'w7taw�� M 4+laXr �I.r^,r • �• p N u p. 8 N r ri N ^el' y Pyp �A 'j r 4N# a��p^yyN iiLY SiY +{��{9 r ���,@yys M e }Ni 6p '�� '�i .t� LI _t ='aVpq ,i��, �yi. �• 8w5 jM�� � N p6���. �.�[ 1n+ �. � n �� s. ae Via• � ir1yyyy��-f 1F.� V yM yN YtlWfL'1B� tYP R� m� MfMf y�y�� N1iH/�ir inww$a SCa :1 sra� .MI +Cni'lib�•5 4 - ANIL 15 popt�pp O+ Ca 8� for. J yyyyp LV.at' S«� is �'h�43 CU zz CAL jib 25 Fill gcx a n is - Y 1. 6 v+ ,' •6A f 5 �.°.': re s.. S C a' ! %p Nip y y ,r ^yet rp��* t AI' ` M M N 40 V V^ N M✓ @ +� N Y ✓r C T M M Q 'N i�'� � ,�u`. a N t 'mow' � �'{, 6u: -�Lw i +�'c�'� m p"" � «{� g�''��qt gyp, ■* If .. „ i "✓Yf : i.M" r°C �'ID^ SY�. N6. .li MQ"�a. ��s �.iS�� is�w ��R i sM {. a � C� Y�gtQi .. rpr� Y1 �N� ywfL wl. Yy�_yd 6�/4 ,K4 YY `` ^awl M6" w. @�Y KQXp �w }" ^w� AT 'R Vt wLV p.�,•rRI, r 0 Kaw Dy 54'0h _ti mM �' i• �ei.. ' 'm »4tlS w. Kia S9 roNa -w�4 rt " qu�a. py.Nw `l N i art c �G�y{ �WFq 3 P �i •.,. �1 {. i i V 4 M��. YY��"$•� L �rC W �YO N �^ +NM�r ^ �N• . T. � . ri0 .�py Vy�•� 4L�OOH � �O..Qa ��Y�0. �V N C� TA z .219 3 xi � Gq�gY VMS G�M a� tlyNp� Pis ,�•'�r �°° >�.° -. a #iQ' � ��+e w�. +' ��s `" a. (v CIS O N H. wj 4 q' I >i ( XIS yy spY pp a r C��= 2'-- d�W YD.��: • N y Y Y V b is gas CCC O K.Yi u �_."•. `..iFFc� �w� q e^'p �� •ir 0`1 b .O• 4 ugL!L U'L. tll a l J. 4p s rL.� L'•'� � yr i Q�� �1 y +� r..J �_ �`�La L N. ii y M``L•...ON� �h. pY N N yw YC N r r w ny 6V>•= N .Ni L ^! � N t r:�y.AAF. NwNi +Y aW" ►ayo�o�ye �..N,Q yYCLa•wy� a70.N V C Y iair x 0.t 9� R •^ ~OM N•+ Q `thy 4.i^O Y 9p NSN" CJ ii w: °.... .r. � 1i � � i arm •i'�' we♦ u•. $R vW �� ° �Y �♦+ q r.i .yd N`C ww+ Lr+ Y •M V VY .. ML ttl R i +C ~ �i,NG. +ta.3 -.. a S.N.. � �w. At....... � a. 1+NA YM Y K iE W-'0 Acs ` a 1 1L RAM gdA w_1 s. x a:'� 13 , ��- ft � � �� a _s, �� 'fit i � . 4 4; 61 3 x' b ` 4a _g IL Us WyiE MaIYYYffffn��M +! „. Ap c,� s 4 Z V�!N ygg lq Iit �_zi - �i +F 1 4 Quality 4 `S $Viii N5 t s �4g$s S " O Lj �- ILE sup '", _ p Acs ` a 1 1L RAM gdA w_1 s. x a:'� 13 , ��- ft � � �� a _s, �� 'fit i � . 4 4; 61 3 x' b ` 4a _g IL Us WyiE MaIYYYffffn��M +! „. Ap c,� s 4 Z V�!N ygg lq Iit �_zi - �i +F 1 4 At 4 l �q ON � • Poor ia� '} kqr so M � s � M` ys• Vt � M �� V � R - \ $� M•. "'F �� � w yF fir, �, �'��: - Sala ilk I 'S W _ �� '"& ayi.YC �7 • Vi ^_"�, y^. "C?ji Ej No ai, g Kyy eV W V- A g iy N p* 4 �} . J. M ` awaz•..'y le' \' N H 1 y: A M !is Ste ' . Sr�. V2 I N r• 11 {L y aRMyWa.. 11• ka.. N S' M � viii �.¢) W Y.• � � �r 4e L a r r a+ A' y Alt N a K par • Yyy4 �r ypQ� ,� ��M M ��Yi t /!Y+{ A�y�q cV'y �1A Mry�.. MA + . _. ARE. aE.. ys Mtw `.emu. ELY At di N M Oi Y Y llf. i N 3I� C 'If ily� , ° . a L A r a' O - MV �1 Jyy.' , ~ . y, i f g$SA .�iti�0��/• ^, * + -V 1 �xA ` i�.- OUT !L! il' tL��� � ^.j+ 4 •�` �O✓ Y���. N� �w ��i' �'.�t ��`.'� �#r •mil 'rt a��,� x8"'.;g.. ]j �'.. .� ♦� �° w� M y O r 1 ?y ►.�a ♦"y ( Oar `[� lox a zh. ' � � t c f DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT:. CITY OF RANQHO My AMOII. A., -` STAFF REP0' RT January `127, 1988 Chairman and Members of the Planning Comissior, Brad Buller, city Planner Bruce Coot:, Associate Planner i ERVIAJN1iENTAL ASSESSMENT AM 4E4EM PLAN MENDRE14T 88-01A JAMES E . request a imen a an an Use map from Office" to 'Neis}hbonc�� Commercial" for approximately 3..45 acres of nand, located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Hellman Avenue AM 20S-202-13,14.'. 1� ENVIROMENTAL ASSES34ENT AND DEVEL CPMENT DIStRICT )REMENT � f. u -� requ o amen e Development ,. p A s r e s Office /Professional (OP) to Neighborhood Commercial (MC) for approximately 3.45 acres `of land, 1�-Ated fits the .';Out west *orner of Base Line Road and Hellman Av�__�*_ zDB_202- 13,14. I. ABST'-.ACT: The applicant, James E. Carter, has initiated both a •enera lan evelopment Districts Amenda►ent to change the existing Officeignation to Neighborhood Commercial for 3.45 acres of land on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Hellman Avenue. The Planning Commission previously considered redesignating the site from Office to Neighborhood C ,;4rcial in August, 1986. At that time, the Commission re�.Omended 'chat the site retain its Office designation. The Commission felt there were a number cf design difficulties associated with this site and was not in favor of a Gcmmercial redesignation which could potentially increase the land use intensity of the site, and therefore, magnify.. the identified- design die44culties in its developwnt. Although staff has required the suWj_ttef of traffic aK14 market studies, a. further analysis t$f this proposal has not found any appreciable change of conditions since the last review fn August of 1986. Therefore, staff has prd4ided ftscl Jtions of' Denial for this project for the Commissions review eW- 6onsideration. II. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTIOK; A. Action Requested: Amend( the, General Phan from ` "Office" to " esgnoorn000 comasercial ", amend the a selojOent Districts Hap from OfficeiPrafassianal (OF .. Co,Naighbahot►d Commercial (N and issuance of a Negativa Ded araWcn. ITE14 P PLANNI* COMMISSION STAFF REPORT RE: 6PASS -0lk,; Dpi 87 -I1: January in -1988 < Page 2 - 4111 7 Y thy, B. Location:. Southwest corner of Base Liae Road and Hellman Avenue. , C. Parcel Size: Approximately 3;46 acres. 0. SurroLndina Land Use and2slninc_ North - Church and single; family residential-, Low Residential (9-4 dwelling -units per core). South Mult-4.family a.artwt �©apiex','' Xedium Residential t84 dwelling uti;ts per East - Service Station Atl Office Bu ldirzg� (Office /Professional).. West - Library and Lions .! Park Lew Ras); ^.atial ()�4 dwelling, units .per acre. . E. General P1a&D_ -_ esignations.- �r ec s a - or-, ce No th j LOW Residential i 4 dwelling units per acre', South -- Medium Residential \( &14 dwelling units per acre). East Office West - Clvis,?C iy and `arks F. Site Charac� isttcs-. Oe �fte in tiered wig L 4nrizil wevis an grasses ,r' wen y si*e�t� in a s4th4rly ��ection. There are no existivig structures ctn the site, but! a taw -wa; Access drive with ,Median island bisects, the prpwt,> ;ie6, a north *0 south direction to provide access for,�►e multi- Fatwiiy apar,Aent complex directly adjacent toed south o ,;tho project site. 111. BACKGROUND: On ,July 16, 2986, the City Cot. -,, < directed tact five Orrice/ raressional bites and one�Co�rcial a be studied by the Planning Coamiissfor.' "for possible General Plan -Land Lae changes. The Cit. Council did not give aft special alternative land !7es to he considered,' but�fcruested tftkk,the Planning C4wisslco study the sites identified and provide, recommendations to the City Coancfl. 'The project site at the Sd� thwest corner of Base ,;Line Road and Hellman Avenue war one,�t'� the five ;sites idcntifiid by the City Council. The Planning Commission r eviewed the rive sites -ai.- th,.air meeting of Augusig 27, 1986, In the review of the Base Line!Hellman site, three al erna{tivs land uses were consideped: J) Medium Residential 21Nplghborhood Commercial 3)OfFiM °. The Com4ission deteratined that multi- famlj� residential c-woulet-Wt be 'Ippropriate adjacent to Base Lfi +! and tl►erefo•� *- was not in favor -of �+e -first alternative. Likewlpp, the Commission was opposeCto the second ;J PLANNING COWISSION STAFF REPORT' RE: :GPA88 -0AA, DDA til�xlt January V, 1988 jak 4 / r J 1 k, aiternatixe to Neighboegcod- 40=ercial r The Cam" 'ion c oncurred f that the site, wau a diffIC -0t one to develop. Their concern was that to redeiignste the ,sit* i.o a: -spore ;in +ensc-dowerci�l usJ, wauld i' only magnify the already _existi�tg,proil"eins. As a result, e& Commission coo ^irked, as c,prohess of a imination, k that Office would have6��,Jeast impact and was the :appropriate choice. The ctnisEnsus �ftf _I`@ Ccxa Scion was to redooW.nd to tlan j City, Council -that. thif -si� `' Main its Office designation. C, their ieetingv of kovember 5,- i§86, the.,Cit. Cauktcil reviewed" t" a planning 4o ssf(In's reccmmeardat ons 'regar'ding thee var'iaiss sites for possib, \'redesigntiop. The City Council r-kncur d with the w Planning Coin scion ::gIlalysis of the .Base, Lineialellman .site, sand they chose not to cbange, tt�esfter eatisting Office detighatien, IV. ENVIR"TAL $,Uff has conducted a Preiminary EFnv'%"r,,tiick '�" s,esd n; initial I Study, per the requirements of the Ca14-6rnia Environptntal ' Oalt2y tAct<_Ond has -determined Ua+ this projern could result in witnificant adverse effects resulting from both socTo- eL:nwft factors and health; safety, and nuisance factors. Its a result, stiff dinnot make a. finding of no significant impacts lead6would reconKRt against the issuance of a Negatdve,; ¢eclaratiov with finis projo�t. Y. GsfMERldt`PL'aN ANEMWENr AFMAtYSzS;�`, A number of _sign `constraints 5s r cs ie eve opmeff ,ict®n r_. " tits - t'�. :3ase Line Road fs a heavily traveled thorjughfa�° . Tra:: Base Lino/Hellman interse(,iton i1, a sLt:der? ue1y`impactcd iptersec« iota., At peak hours of use (weekday morning and evening rust :,ours), traffic movement will back up into the existing driveway on Base Line Road. filso, the access potential off Hell%kW Avenue is severely lamed. Tine sine's relatively short frontage along Hellman E295 fe:4_ 4.restricts dri,eeway locations because driveways gist maintain 4 minimum dtstanca of 200 feet from Base Line on the west side of, Hea'lman. Secondly= access. -'Jrom Hellman is limited, because of cHellza0s cnnfiguratioti where the ' straet, bottlenecks at the rai7,road crossing. A third factor that „onstraip ievolopment potential of -the site is thy. existence of a''Multi- family apaMike"t compnex,,adiacent td tf#e soui:h of tir+a Project, site and tte , attain dn- j �o£ �eaeWnably caiipatible land user � �, Cue Ui, MTI -Ma;,, t configura�tlnri, .:. the apailtn:•ent site could (,vti wcc�ys Off of this street. This left'�Itis site with direct access Only tb Base, Leine ROW, .7 fn'fesponle,` -W, accE.ss easeme?t was cb; *_sinpd by 14hit 4pArtmen't' cite through the projiect site to Base Llfi e& llie 'result i�T A two -way 01ve�y across 1" the entire depth of the t roject }ire that,, essentially' splits ,thi %prdo!erty in half; t _ 1 PLANNING r;0"RI MION STAFF REPORT RE: GPA88 -01r", OVA 87-11 J. Page 4 1 In the analysisS\,of this' proposal, staff, has ideritified three' specific issues. 1hgy include. 1) land use, the appropriatenes3 of the Aite far commercial deaFpation; oaf €i %+tss, traffi ti circulation and ingress /eyres5 i3su, r•dla3o s ec�'j�'� - criteria; and 33 marketWa U sb' , / �_: to deteremir; , feasibility of tpe s e or a 0WWftial rather" than'>�, Laad Use: in comparing alternative future land use options pro ec site, an unavoidable conaidogtian is the existeire of tt, adjacent multi- family apartment' cotes ex.' p� to unite design constraints, previoe5ly highliottd, :his ,Aparearent 4a lex ,must .,hare access tit: the pr'ojec#i site. ! Tha n -esent conffguraticn between the ta., sites would require a ucs antial buffer frco - :' whatever is 6114 7tely dc�r�lapa? on th; project- site. In their pret<ious review "619 the proposal , to ,reksignate Anis site as tomraerciai, the Plar.,nIng Cemmizsi6 d2'Germimed that fiulti- famill residential would 'be an iqappropr mite use because. it was , undesirable to locate higher density residential.;units so close to Base Line Road. j The City's goat foi, land `cse as per the General ` kM , (Paged'- i, "'Land use stall he managed,- 'with respect to Jecatf, :a, t3 end denaity /intensity of d�vYPopwnt in Order' to N'j consistero the capabilitiez, of the . i# stated objective-to , Vii. , a is to, "Organize land'i!ses to avoid creating Wsaris:l1 amortc I adjacent band uses.,r The Com:ifssio Felt that to - redesi �=nke the site to a, land ute 0rt permits a greater° %tensity 'ofi_uae woirrd'only magnify.. 1` the existV pco4lexs and would root :be consistent with "e Land d:se "etert of the r''6,neral Plan. lWafore, tht .CoaWss cn :did nol, recomnend redesignation of tKis rk` ,to neighborhood CQMercial. In staff's opinion, sine the "wire of_ ._ :� Commission" previous review to rederignte this site tot �xia7, very little=, if any, I of, che conditions have cr �► ud: The- ssues and resulting analysis as determined by the Pia*k" Commizsicn wtth'6eir, previous rev! are still valid todaj% c, Traffic V..rculaticn - 7he. Avnl ie )ot had Grear and "Company- Engineers p epat"e a re'ific "'sti:4 to..: dddrpss the traffic issues assecieted with -this site .'taff's ga��. ry cancerA is that Cs a°ser&iall''s 4 more incense 'Ifld us ;'thcr� is Olficeyprn,essiarzal ��tii intensified lat>;a us* - " ..jperik ed V& t`i traffic `study �t. ° i impacts associacted wince the"' �. 'k under for r c@ndi ,K F sly Under current coft4v&4 ,_.. r(� na e%fstI tg development on r „ rl the «i �_vt the -situ built odd. *ith� 40,OW square feet under .�, Er Y, thd*fice designatf: bit, - R. o ' Pz ANNING COMISSMON STAFF' PORT :.: M - OPA8841A. DDA 87 11 L r page S ( ::= Ith, tha= site built out with 3)1,000 scpare fci,E� /of Ct�iersiasl /Retail,Vs #, and; 14) .liiW i_U� sitl `built out with- al '0000 s�ua'rip feet Of co i al /Retail Use, including a 6FAD `square; feet convenience stare'«., The ='traffic studx-/4 token- at WhWi Dflld be t�,traffic condit6ns < 'both in x'989 under the `°aur alternatives, ark , also the traffic -joio 3r. conditidnVirt the yee The results_; f, T traff4s t-tutPire that far 5989 the ''traffic circulatiat± e. C3mti.ine Road C syst and Hel U' a i venue watatd he moderately impactel wo th 66verop6ent of the site. 10&; ,Ahe utter; utian Would still be oPerating at, a �, better tha a . Aable' leVOT' of �sorvice. , In comparison of irafflc � impacts 'e Xcemorcia;l de416* ni< `= versuk- i3ffiCe evel'aAwnt, ie traffic Ok,1u saPCls dad that more datily�_Araf fic wcat°�4 y(.9ult,, frM {.� - Co"Wrci rage, .,thin i�`Efize use" but'- • there W be no = 'signific��t difference to thy; aperiting lavei of scavice af. the i iraffic; syat resulting ' 'Ir ,either the Commtrciai 1o"r Office Okewise, in i : the stu4 c0oay�',,�s that the traffic system be heavily ii �iaet� otta�,p ,�',�e to City build -out, and i 4 er there, is an C fi4e :. act, Cam t3 ia1 .Orgject,.__O Oa project`-, it Will trove 1itLT.e�;4ct as to +d „� oaera�if corer; �i� F the tr#fic Agaw its t, system. these �ris�r 4 of traffic i octs c3' Ccnw�e eial development wersps Qf €ice� x @lQ tt1 the traffic study concludas traffic that .t;aro- dai i�r.., w old IF roe Ctmoorcl,al rather t OfMce i4ie, Nt-''there would' be no si9nifttWant',`40ference tu.;r*he operati level of s jrVfce of the traffic syj tem rcAlting- kraua v. either the Com rcfgl or office., use.'' In analyzing the A_�sults of the traff., c studcf, i ertain poihts must be kept in mind. ` (Y), - The, Traf.Zic 'Stud'y `bOy''considered 0o effects of the potential” Site,46410poeat aiternatiues as they relate" 'o to impacts to th:0 ee iaherai street systw;a, 'i.@. off. { site oirculatfon,;, (2) lbere are a number of on- site Iirafff-4 issues that must" 'ra« be fonsidered witrr tM pro e ' c . a N 1 { \ (a)., %e p oat sic,, shar«ec' access with' the a . decor F P(I ;a ar nt cor*l e;; to the I.Wuth < V,' Ah OmMirci �i rises ?� t,c;p��aed to. Offfice v"Se ) here would be � a 'Writ' gt ater .Ofr' Od site truck traffic:, for r, k ` del i0ry: purposes _ eadin to a greaten number. Crai'.fiM Conflicts with aomatile c� users � , 3 �. � PLANNING`C(*AISS1ON STAFF REPORT RE. - GPAWDIA, DDA 87-11 ,. Januar 1'. X983 Page 6' (b) Commercial useiproduces the greate"r number of trips to and from the site ' then would office use. 144th the shared :access with the apartment complex the 4reater number of trips onto::; he site'`,nould increase traffic conflicts with` the apartment users. (c) Office related traffic is generally on Week days during business hours, peak use is at morning and evening rushes with Titited'use at other times. Commtercial traffic oc :mrs during" weekda v,. business hours`as with Office, but 'will also craur during the evenings anelJor weekends. Therefore, increased (, traffic use is, extended over a longer period of time and would resuT* in increased impacts to the apartment usei,s and 'users of the eenter as they traverse both an -site and off -site. (3) Finally, the traffic study indicates there would be no significant difference between. Office and Commercial uses .in term of traffic im'os±';ts, However, in assessing this 'conclusion one Est understand the ,is,umptlons an tihfch the comparison was made. In this study,. -commet,cial use is based on 31,0_00j square feet of development while ir, the Office deireff_ament it was assumed X0,000 squar;.; -r'eet of devolopmeni. Also, the traffic study was under an assumed office mix of 10 percent fine ,%Als ''50 potent medical /dental, and 40 percent general office. In the gercuration of traffic n pbers general office results 'in the least impac, with i noncial and -vdical /dcnftl i�oing significantly greater impact in the turn of numb ,)r of trips getnerated. of the .office mix were recalculated in greater fav &r of general office at--the expense of kdicalidental and financitl the }raffic numbers would be changed Ujat coule .possibly,-"iter the Uvel of signifitonce Nltween commercial axt,d office` uses of the r site. Market Analysis - The applicant indicates that he is requesting t"15 e from Office to Neighborhood Commercial because It is his belief that there is not sufficient ;;errand -tn absorb 30,000* aquare feet lof professional srffice space that would be provided if this .site was completely built out as office use. j At the City's request, the :applicant provided as Dart of this proposal, a market, >rE+S0arch'study to Cesare the exfsting market conditions Letween office and eoramercial use. The findings of the study, Indic "es' I that tnj-- eAisting supply of office ,(Community- scaTe) has'approach:d the point of equilibrium, ,and it is 4u2stfonabT6 as to whether t.e need exists to. "absorb the additional square. footage that would be with this %provIled , l - PLANNING Cots i SICK STAFF_ REPORT RE; GPA88 -01A, BZ,A 87- -11 f Jan!iary 27, 1988 ` Page T j i development /,as office. The study indicated irat there is strong market potential for certain ca�merciai re ail uses such as family restaurants, speciality =,'mod store i and apparel shops,r i A quest] n of the market study concerns the,bi is assumption J under wh ch it was compiled that if the site %iIre to be left with its current ; office designation it would bi'dsveloped 100 percent as prof,U oval office use. `This is k y�estionable assumption. Tice Ito office/professionai' zone of Development Dade permits a n ber of service /retail uses wi in the office designation. t` ;} office ""designation has a fl.exibllity of- available land uya"s to permit the d;�velooment of a mixed - use center;! and' is not confined to Just the development of professional 4ffide space. A*ey point to consider, however, is that the service�rotafi: uses permitted under 'Office are of a low intensity type that would be more compatible 'With the y adjacent residential U?!es. She Neighborhood Coa�zercial designatioii permits a nuTaba; of higher -i tensity type of uses j that would not be as c ?�atible with th'e adjacent apartment. cc:_-�lex. = A final concern 4f -'thq market study is that the market study area used to a less need war; eased 0 a 1-1/2 mile radius o .-, the prf4ect site. Thus the stu4y areas wan confined to the area south of Banyan only There is a signi0icant population that resides north of Banyan that could potentVally make use of the services provided on the site. A question remains of the market study, that if the entire population from nortf, of ease Line and west of Haven wasi 7n uded =in the stukW, would there then be sufficii4t demand to warrant the provision of add,+itionall office space? , VI. DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT_ ,'464EhOMENT ANALYSIS: State Liw requires that; e Deve ,.opmen s r"Tc s" s, I e�,, on n_ ©reinance, be . onsistent 1 °fith the General elan (Section 5586''!.;' _ Government Cede). If findings can not` -4e Wade to warrant a General Plan- ,Atmendment ,of the site to a Comoeraial land use designation, similar findings should also made regarding the proposed Development District Amendment -of the site to Gomarcial devempaent district to maintain this requirement of crnsistency -,., VII, FACTS FOR . FINDINGS: in 0der . for the Planning`? rc- ,"Issfon to rzcommer+ approval of this project,, they must find.the following. - 1. That this project is consistent with the ?and use..policaes t, of `he General i Plan. 2. That this project would be 0, ,the best inter t of the healt4j i safety, acid we� the citizens of Ra�tch� / ,of camanga, y ALA #HF1i& 4�1IS5�dk SYAFE'�EPfNti� � , RE: GP48 &01A, DDA 87-11 ,U Page 3. fiat this project would not, result ir��` ^,D' signiffcant' adverse" il*,�,7cts to parsons Ind property in the vfcinit r o .tire project' fit# s ' ite*-'-�has ,beta advertised i`7-) the Daily Report newspaper s a Public Rearing itegs� 011 pr<perty owners'within 300 feet of the project $its were sint direr mail Public Hearing NotUes, and the Prop -r°t, was posted with, a 4 foot � � B i'fout large notification .sir par tiie City supple its! noiid np requirements ^' r' REC"k�" ata reeowvebnds that the p7q!� Jng c olon orrar City Council re olUtions rftMftf-;�g the denial of this project,,`or rersoos,�s stated iz► the tisolat#ons— if thIt 'L Coals #ssio � cern:urs; then the` xdo;tlon of the atVached';resututiorf� wOOld be a6Wiriatf. Brad Butler 1 City Planner MAWS Attachments: 4. Extt4�sit "`A" - Lgcatf*O$urround hg Land qas Genere -I Pian snd Devalo*ntlDistricts Exhibit T-- 7 Vistrict, n�.nt Kap , 1 .4 Exhibit , Proppsed .5'>Pl, Exhibit Apptican�,'% Stat nt of'.Justff: atfdn u Exhibit "Er - Trafffd Study by Green aged t aiiy ;; Q Exhibit " " - Mitrket;Eea5f4rFlt "ty 5tudy b an R2sorch 4:$QCitt!S Resolution of Denfel /I.GPA) ' Resolution of fl s #al;r 1 DA) • s # #.... ++ o'er -• o' #_o'r�i ! P r 1 a r iaf r9 Y# f M P� sf :rlry.Prra t L PA DeVelopment Districts,,.:, tp{ Si - T R '1.. cr k i i'F 1rt: �A � '- IA /IQQA - t ANCHO CL to WONCA EXHINTi- SCALE' t �. 4 s yi ♦ •� °.Pa° .a:i: IT 1:wP t Y 9r eLY„R i1 +i. R° #f *s Umn eital Plan °R��. °. M • aoa oneyaaa • s # #.... ++ o'er -• o' #_o'r�i ! P r 1 a r iaf r9 Y# f M P� sf :rlry.Prra t L PA DeVelopment Districts,,.:, tp{ Si - T R '1.. cr k i i'F 1rt: �A � '- IA /IQQA - t ANCHO CL to WONCA EXHINTi- SCALE' t �. Apr trt y.i st VKAW c0 uw LOP AQ pro P raw. m ap r «,' 1 f ', Wmf,.i ti a Cali A 18 � ♦' i� �'tJ tt1 f Mr � �' +54� �-. •�1 SQ , ! r 8�. �c+ AAbCp _ Psr,I71[- V-0 +SI6A:MMih W► frP'ak �. r� {: . �°�''' k , V it drA.�CT� wawewte7 � c OF RANCt —ii nANTNISC .OE�lEt4114' li Dt °°�RitRit ,I I RAT -1AF _� 1.1 �~ PP1YaM1l1aM�JMSi 1 � nw�s naps, MNS, i 1, � 3 � ' • e ��.. •� .�.. �� 7 &DER a ,xrHV s �`�` 1 ��w�� eW r.• }} j 1' � � I J � z { wr' l i i �� rremva• � t � ssawati�ra9t rarrwt �.+�wrfrd.�a Ox ` ,.� 1 NOM- 60 C AWL �£F1� �8 fad tin . ?- t ���� .� . U lTnE_ ro ¢ E r - �: c lnxHitlt j 1 � 11"M f.%XMM 1)i;Y8GOI?XWT Coitp'1w i € s I t 888 'mirth '.,thin: str6etr suites 801 r i s sart &'is. ftlifornia 9270i 1724) 543 -0259 .. f C ' CITYOfi P ;S inAmm".: .11144;U4, January C, Mr. Bruce Cook i City of Rancho ,Q Oamonga / Planning Department P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Res GPA 08+- 01A /DDA 88+ -11, Dear Mr. Cook; \\ Today 3 received the revis of the Traffic Impact Analysis from Greer and Company, one was to - e ��1V,-.red to your today also. Since I . provided hiss with the assumptions u` an whici� the OP alternz; rive use was based, i thought I should prbVvWG You .'with zny rcAsoning; I instructed Mr„ Greer to estimate the size of the OP building 4r,.; 40,000 square feet. The proposed ,$C: is Cn_y 30,00Q. square primarily because retail requires -that the buildings to pr* stoj,y high. However, most of the OP bu #d�.ngs are two sto . ry Prim to they preliminary review, my- architect,:aid out a 45,00.0 square fpuM office imilding on :he Parcels thnsrefora';the 40,000 square foot ase6ptton is L'onservatative. Also, I asked the 7Mabket Anatyat to give me a probable mix of uses for the Op alternative. As You can )nrag3re, this was a difficult questioix , ,o antVer sites thivxe is #0o i- r Cut nar'cet for any qP use. He did p('int ou : that-: the market tud•� showed' a Larger demand for Medical & D .dal thin for general office, a.;,tho%tgh there is no unmet used in e3 -Ur al; li -1 therefore, r i;)ld Mr. Greer to allocate 40 of the build%n'_r, to M,edicalnental, ' i0V �to fik `=ial (the. only OP catagory that has, any unmet need) and 508 to general offioe { and other professionals. Therefore, I believe, we havt;; takea a conservative :approach to the mix also When we'statrted contacting the�jneighbors, we found a couple of errgrs in our mailing list, leorge Settler's �ctdrtss vas "275 Eiellma . ra is -. than 7272 Fteliman. A 10 we left ofsc 14axVin Brandt. 2 have written a both of these fndiv duals so they '..ire aware kh;'� propoa,ed c i application. have included three new sets of labels to replace `'the N ones we provided previously, ,.t 1 C - As you k*nowr..l d aq & PhdaY at 6,z30 Gallo tit t hb,tioW fan er. iE P,m. a� bleat .. �. xY t . we hav Written ��d adf1kcant d./ncra acid Will Yaq d tritaexti +s� re to the tP tenant residtpta this weeei 1 infor g tha' of th lxeetiuq. We have ta�ised tp many of the+ apartment reps Wants . Of those contacted, 95$ had no obi ctia,& � a > or two voia�d concetrzVover the problem they #ave turn3X left air# and onto Saselino„ 2 b0li*vO the grcrpaaed Project will be of a bonrefif; i mt regard, by addix g acces R tc;--$a2 2st87t: c�z.ee wanted 6�i be tares motet E �j didn't put iii an other s�ervi".- station or a J'a�ck- in-the� -R�x. � I V �F! hope -you can k4tend the meeting on the 15th.. very tru g; $`WTZR ` t s t _ e o ti Section _. Yrhim district it "intand4 gor Onerel vrtumaralel activities seuvlcxa b>? a rnors Intensive nature. Mould be located pcitnarlilt e* transportation routes end would i ude'.r,1ejor, *hopping fscilltier; �viae- oriented uses, m+ a+� aitt wbold. ate huad�wertees wWchlire Wined to serve.th* CIt7 or the Swdost IT.10 M lln Uses`yUsted In Table 11.10.034 tb&U --A allOWAble in One or MOM of,.tba, _� districts as Indicated in the c,40 �.:odmrtmeralal triat. W l?.ilt�tted' j! With tha letter "P ", the use i+al1, y/' witted ues in tWjdWrIOt. WhOrs with. thip, letter "G", sitsli a t dtio* use aJikt io'tire CoOt Permit Pte• U, tin avant there is difficulty Ian csatevorbdtrg' a given use In Ono nf.te4m o die lets, the pm.Sdure outlined to lieati 17. .040 s `I be i�auo aged. TABLE 1T:2 ®.0�',� �TlA� IC�ttIL NE.....�. A. Offices end Related Uses ; 1. Administr*tive.Ul executive -PfSi , P 2. Artist scud pMtope#4a studt itQt P In ludirq the salve ruppliaa. P - 3. Clerical. and �srofoitSl Offiesst�, "' � P y PC-1 l 4. Pinancial $*Vic" end institictiouw. P P Ia bidth P P P 5. Medical, dental and �+ l` services {non animal related) ' Mlu&r* laboratories and eiinien oniyt the o articles cleac�y xrxiasfantaii ti tiir atervices provided 3MU be �pitt A. 6. Prese5e/ to<t *urrmp i as, dales wbee " .;? P P igcat+3d� `w�ithist +a', cont : '4 OW offices of S W morn nx cal grcuattticmat i 7 U* build�ino,t�iC,l�ftitrat Yi �Ity -aru,, count buildirgs, `pedal distri�s FfM+ �t 1' r office). office /. - �'', C Pubdc utility secs trfitft$. l l� PubUe facility (Polio, flee, p, ansbulenCertl,., Y y, (( J -"; „ `1 \ t _ nstu -ti4tt of i� �►i. Tte �� Odriimerc�isl }yam �ts3ttt+greRt�it}�',�> P 1 � � st*ti 0701 -02 0 1- 27-88 PC Agenda & of 6 �r 3 Section 17.10.030 vc OC ( Service or gasoline. dispensing C C, p statiomt (including i1*Jw repair such as brakes, batteriss, t m�ifiltun*-(W: t� 10. Bakeries (reta P P 11. Barber and b"ut j shops. ; , p 12. Bleycio shops.: t 13. Blueprint alai photocopy swWaw 14. Boat and eartt gr salo and serAeas. 15.. Boc►te , gift and stationary storas (other . C F g than adult related material). i 16. Candy stom,#nd confectionaviea. - g 8' Z i c �+8t0Pin� e8t�lilYill::21:i. r` r 1} /? Yt3. Cleaaitgf and grairt:s,tablishvnents. C p =8. Carpenter"shop or sstibindt shop. p 20. Cocktail lAunp (far, lounge, tavern} c i including reiat*J entertainment. (a) Operated independent of & C C (le) Accessory to a restaurant C C C 21. Commercial recreation facilities. (a) indoor uses such as bowling, J C C P theaters, biltards, _ (b) outdoor Such as golf; tennis, C , a' basketball, U"ball, : tiampolines, etc 22. COhtracolr yards (jereening of outdoor, storage c� sired). 6 23. Dairy product stores." c � AA . r 7 f Section' 1f.16.43,9 24. Deientat0 res. 25 J DczVe -in bM.'1390 includin jheater3, l ,jottwr, thwa fart food restaUran 4 �. a1 �� 26. Dkt* stores .and pharmacies. P 11 -. 27. Equipment rc 7.' ai yards. T f ` 26. Fast =food festaurgast& ;.I I C C P. 29. Pee&Taek stores G P 3,,0. Florist shops, P P ���� P a, l Food st4k+e tsupemre3ts, a P P 36: Furniture storex repair and upholstery, P P. " 33. ' General rated stores. 34. "::rec�?vus stares. .. 1P P 35. Home imp►ovPtint centers. , �11 11 (a) fttorivl stored and sold; within �� P enclosed buildings (ta) Outdoor storage of mat"rial such lumber & t . `ls 36. Hotels and Motets. \1 C � P 37. ti tee Machines (outdoor ). � � � r,., _ C l C � _ 33. Janitoral services and sup0liO3. C P P i 39. Jewelry stores. �<< P P Laundry- salt -service. - P P { a ° 41. Liquor stores. - P. P 42. Kiosks for key shops, ultra drops, etc, in C 'C parking lots, 43, locksmith shop, yl P P 44. Mint -storage for public use (no outdoor, - r :r storage), 'r.s I, r, I . sp Section 17,10.030 1 _. \� `� •i Wig. }qg �} �/� `. 45. Mortuaries and cemeterie(; C C C 46. Motorcycle axles sand service. 47. Newsgap and m star prig ry - G p 1 and publishing 48. 'nurseries and garden surVly stobc3; in - " 1? provided, the ,, HC district, :ll equipment, supplies and material arc kept j within an ahalosad area. 49. Office and busiagas machine stores. G P Z? j (� 50, P -vldng facilitiesloommereial) where fees C �- 1. P are charged. St. Political or phllanthiopic headquarters. C C P 52. Pet shog. ;i P P 53. Plumbing ship and stplies. - p tj 54. Photacopy P P l' 55. Printi4 shops. y p r 56. Restaurants (other than fast food). (a) with ;entartsinment and/or serving t3=: � of alcoholic beverages n; (b) lncidentai 9 vim of beer and wine but vtithou P P P cocktail lounge, bar,, ,entertainment or dancing 57. Recreational Vehicle Storage yard. C C G -. 58. Shoo stores, sda and repair. - P P 59. Seeon4i -hand stores and psi" std. P ; 60. Shopping Center,'subject to pro- isions in C C Section 17.10.03) -F.6 61. Spiritualist readings or astrology y P forecasting. 62. Sporting goods stores. P p f 53. Stamp and coin shops. ------ -,, p l+ u , n Section 17.10.030 (Y 1 64. Swimming pool Supplies. j i P P 65. Tailor. P P 66. Tayidermsia.`- �\\ P r?. Television, racdo ea is and service. s . P P 1 63. Tire sales` and service... 63. Tay stores. p 70. Travel agencies. F P P `21. Teangmtation facilities (train 'and htzi4 C C C tax depots). t 72. Track and trailer rent* tales and sarvi.ce - C 73. 79, Variety stcrQs. �! y Vahicular tq 1�?b - 'P P \ 4. storage yard and vfice. C. Public and sesni�ublic m 1. flay Care PctiES C C ; S G' i`r= 2. Convalescent facilities and hospitals « C - (/ 3. Private and public clubs and ion os ' G C C including YNRCA, YWCA and similar yauO. uses. group 4. Educatip"al institutions, parosdel, priVata C C C (including calleps end universid m). = 5. Libraries do museums, �wblic or �-Ivate. C 6. Parks and recreation facilities,`*bHe or C ' C private. ( ; 7. Public utility in C r,'1 C G S. Vocational cc business trade schools. C C 2« Churches, convents, monasteik-,LAndother�;. -t °� t; �� C religious instiVIt ons. A RESOLUTION OF THE RA`.'AO CUCAMONGA FLANNING COMMISS:??N RECOMMEN'JlNG DEOIAL OF A REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPIENT DISTRICTS MAN DDA- 87 -11, FROM OFF"ICEjPROFESSIONAL TO F,0Gff8PRHOOD COMMERCIAL FOR A 3.45 ACRE PARGEL LOCATED OH 714E S4UTHNEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND HELLMAN AVENUE, itltFiCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AND ?WE FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. (1) James E. Uttar has filed an application_ for the pevelcpment Districts Amendaent No. E7 -11 as described in the titl( rf this Res�Autiivn. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Pistricts Amendment request is referred to as The Application. (ii) On January 27, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing ode The Application . and corrcludod•sald hearing on that date, t _ (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoptit,ls'of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution, NOW, THEREI"ORI, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning CoWssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: i E 1. This Ummission hereby. specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. G. Based Upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during Use above - referenced public hearing on January 27, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this 1 Commission hereby specifically find;, as follows: 4 (a) The Application applies to a 3.45 acre parcel of land ; basically rectangular in configuration, located on the southwest corner of E Base Lure Road and Hellman Avenue. Said property is currently designated as Office /Professional on thn Development Districts Map and is substantially vacant land except for an 'existing access easemeT0. that bisects the property in a north- south direction o1pr which a two way driveway with central meelian is developed; And (b) (he property to the north of the subject siteC is designated Low Residential (2-4 du/ac) on the Development Districts Map and kk c0ns19ts o a chur,sh site and surroundir,g Single Fam,1y Residential, the property to t`o sost* of the subject site fs designated Medium Residential (9,- 14 dulac) opt thq Development Districts Map and consists. of a multi,- family; apartment complex, the property to the East is designated Office /Professional on the Development Distrf•;ts Map and- consists of a Service Station and "Office',` �w 1, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO> RE: PDA` 87 -11 January 2y, 1988 P 2 W. buildings, and the property'to the west is designated Lo4 Residential (2 -4 du /ac; on the Development Districts ftp and and consists of � e public 'Library and Lions, Park; and (c) The applkation requests the AMAdwant ;.: the Development Districts flap from Office/Prgt'ess'ienal 'to Neighborhood Commerci,'al for the 3.45 acre parcel; and t't (d) The application wotAd not be consistent with tite Land Use Element of tte General Pian, could potentially result in significant adverse impacts to pe�rsans and property in the lowdiate. vicinity of the subject site, and would not be in the best interests; of the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the City of Rancho Cucounga:as follows-. (i) Severe site constraints limit the: ',developrtent potential of this site. Specifically, this site must share ',access -= to peripheral streets within an adjacent apartment complex. 'Phis shared access requirenient limits the site's potential to be buffered from th4 adjacent apartment. ` The Application would pervsi't land uses of greater interlpity than under current Development Districts designAtion. ihnrefore, this Aijlication has the potential to increase land use incompatibilltv.of this site( with the adjacent residential use, and this is contrary to the.- ,b3ectives of the land Use Element of the General Plan. i (ii) With the approva,! of° this application, the project site would be s,. .)jccted to land uses ofJ greater intensity that would expose adjacent residents to greater amout s of noise, objettionable adors, f light /glare, truck traffic, litter aid other nuisance factors. These j conditions have the potential to result In significant adverse impacts t7 the people and property in the immediate '�,Icinity ,,jf the project site, and f therefore, would not be in the best interest cif the health, safety, ;,and welfare of the citizens of the City'of Rancho Cucamonga. (iii) Based upon the substantial evidence presented', to this Commrission during the above- referelced'' public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes t`at the application would not Re consistent with the objectives of the LanaVuse Element of the General Plan t� organize land u3es to avoid creating nuis -aces among adjacent land uses woul4 not be in the best 'interest of the City ', of Rancho Cucamonga, and would not, protect the health, safety, and welfare the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga,, California. (iv) In conjunction with the Application, an Initial lil Study /Preliminary Environmental Assessment, in conformity with the requirements with the California Environmental Quality Act, has been prepared; however, Commission has determined that this project could have a1 significant adverse effect on the environment, and hereby declines to stake a finding of no significant impact and to certify a Negative Declaration. (v) Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above, this Comru►ission hereby recommends denial of The Application and directs that a certified copy of this Resolution and related material be forwarded tothe City Council for final determination. o ti, RE: DDA 87 -1;1 r M) t-lbe Deputy Secretary to this GoWw,sion sbal i certify, to ifle adoption of this Resolution, APPRQYEb AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF UARY,,j98$, - �� � PLANNING CG?�1ISSION iR: l'l�l£ CITY OF RANCH6"CUGA'MOM; arry 1. e m arm" 1 !ATTE$T: rat u erg, U*VIty zecrettarl ,t, ,t - t I= . Brad OullEr, Deputy Secreiary' of the Planniag Commission of the City of Ranchc,Cuc nga, do hareby certify that the foregoing Resolution vi;s duly and lx: regularly 'introduced, passtd, and adopted by the Planning Comis0otr of the City of R4nch6'tu 0aaa*, at a regular ,meeting of the Planning Cowfm ssion held on the 27th 'day of January, 19W, by the fol'lgwing vt .�040- is AYES: COWISSIONERS: � I� NOES: COWISSIONErRS: ABSENT: C09AISSSIONERS: J t - ddlk r a � j RESOLUTIOhi NG. A RESOLUTION PF THE R41FdCHO CUCA,MONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMEkJI;tNG DENIAL OF A REQUEST TO AMEND TFE LAND USE MAP OF TOE GENERAL PLAN, GP4 88 -0IA, FROM c; FFICE TO IiEIGNBOit,O)a COMMERCIAL FOR 3.45 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWirST CORNER ,OF BASES LINE ROAD AND HELLMAH AVENUE, RAK7,H0 CUCAMoxcA, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKE FINDINGS IN SUPPORT 1\4EREOF A. Reci,W s. J (i) Janes E. Carter has an application for the General Plan Amendment No. 88-01A hs describ-J in the title of this Aesolut'.ion. Hereinafter in this Resol`'ution, the subject General Plan Amendment request is referred to as The Application. (III' On January 27, 14861, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted', duly noticed public hearing on The Application and concluded said hearing oil that date. , (iii) All legal prereqisites,to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. I N04, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by thw Planning Conwission of the City of Rancho Cu camtonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A. of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on January 27,E 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together with public , testimony, this Comnissian hereby specifically finds a�; follows. (a) The Application aatplies to a 3.45 acre parcel of hand basically rectangular in configuration; located on the,southwet cornew'of Base Line Road and Hellman Avenue. Said property is currently designated as Office on the . f;and Use Map of the Genei',ai Plan and is substantially vacant land except "or an existing accei;a easo'ent that bisects the property in a north -south direction over which A ttao way driveway with central median is developed; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is designated Lour Residential (2 -4 du /ac) on the Land Use Map of General Map and consists of a church site and surrounding Single Family Residential, the Property to the south of the subject site is designated Medium Residential (8- 14 du /ac) on the Land UseL Map of the General Plan and consists of a multi- family apartment complex, the property to the East is designated Office on the Land Us+lMap of the General Plan and consists of a Service station and Office i PLAMMING C"ISSZGN RESOLUTION ,y RE: GPA 88-011 buildings, and the ;property to the west is designated Civic /Community and_Faek on the Land Use flap of the General, Plan ccn.ists of the pualis Library and Lions Park, and tC} The application requests the Amendment of the Land Use Map of the Genera+, , Plan from t -fice to tleighborhood Coca -rcial for the 3.45 acre Parcel; and (d) The application would not be consistent with the Land Use Element of the General Alan, could potentially result in significant adverse impacts to persons and property in the iawd #ate vicinity of the subject, site, and would not be in the best interests of the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: (I) Severe site constraints limit the development potential of this site Specifically, this site mint share access to peripheral streets with an adjacent apartment complex. '!his shared access requirement limits the site's potential to be buffered from the adjacent apartment co;aplex. The Application would permit lard uses ;.of greater intensity than under current General Plan designation. Ther`afor�a, this Application Vitas the potential to increase land use incompatibil ;'ty of this site +with the adjacent residential' use, and this is contrary t� the objectives of the Land Use Clement of the General Plan. (ii) With the approval of this application, the project site would be ::,objected to land uses of greater intensity that would. expose adjacent residents to Creator amounts of noise, 'oectianable odo, light /glare, truck traffic, litter and other nuisance factors. Thersse conditions have th& potential to result in significant adverse impacts to the people and Property in the immediate v #c #ably of the project site, and therefore, would riot be In the best interest/ of the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of tijaru J of Rancho'Cuc4iunga. (ii #) Based i�pon the substantya!l evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and fapon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes that the application would :got be Consistent with the'objectives of the Land Use Eietent of the General Flan to organize land, uses to avoid creating nuisances among adjacent land uses Mould not be in the best interest of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and would not Protect the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Ranchr Cuc California. Wanga, (iv) In conjur:ction with The Application, an Initij StudYlPrelioinary Environmenta.7 Assessment, in. corformity with the requirements with the California Environmental Quality Act, Ito been prepared; however, Commission has determined that this project could have a significant adverse effect nn the enviro"ont, and hereby declines, to make a adik finding of no significant Impact and to �ertjey a Negative ieclaration.` (v) Based upon the findings arid cor,Clusions set forth _in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above, this CMission herebykreCO r:ds denial cif. ' }re .Application anti: directs that a certified copy of this Resolution and `jted material, be forwarded to the City Council for final determination. c PLANUING RE: SPA -- - Pagc=3 Alk .till � _. c C4 , �r %rf iviy The Depu y Secretari to thjirComaission.. ,--shaj certify to f' , ? option of this ReWution. PROVED Ar ADOPTO THIS lU DAY OF 1ANtiAFtY, Ma. ` ANldING C YISQ0M OF t'H CITY OF Ji WHG CUCNOP 1 8Y: ?> airy T, WWI, Gnal "n i� ATTEST: " " ix-0 "SuTier, upory wrietar I. grad Bulle neputy' Secretary of the Pj.aon%_q C ion of 'the City pf Rancho Cucaae .�, da herby certify that the ar going ution spas duty " regularly int,,WAced, passed, and adopted 6,�, t%o P1eanIng _C �� aWssioq of ; %e City of Rancho Cucamonga,, at a regular, twe.iiq of the Planrliq CoWssioss old op the 27th day of January, I9 ,why the f07x0w ybke�-to -wits AYES: COMISSIQNERS: NOES: C%kS�IFSSIgidERS �� ASSENT: 30MUSIONERS: n r i MY QE+' RA NCH u `AMONGA Aftk STAFF REPORT DATE: January 27, I988 MI 1= TO Chaimar, and o5 Rbers of the Piarning Comf4ssioa FROM: Brad F,ai'ier, City Planner F BY: Scatt'hdrphy, As3ociate,Planner SUBJECT; EAST AMU2 WALL - CITATION - Review of a proposed per er wa a ong as Avenue for a residential subdivi '4ton of 74 single family lo#sn 32.6 acres of land In the goer Residential District (S-4 dolling units per acre) 0 the Etiwanft Specific plan, locat4d on tho C,,Ut side of East Avenue at Catalpa, Street - APltt 227 - 071 -47, Il arc'", =PO> I. BACKGROUND: On July 8, 2987, the'Planning Commission reviewed and ' 01,6 110 y approved lentative Tract 18083, As a condition of [ approval for the tract," a decoratFvehasonry 'wall gas required kr: along East Avenue. Also, additional 'landscaping was required f be the sidewalk "and the wall to soften the impact of the wall. j Following the Planning Commission meeting, an appeal was filed with thm City Council. A portion of the appeal, expressed conco-0 about the design of the perixeter wall alun9.E4st Avenue. On August 19, 1987, the City Council conducted;,a puMic hearing to receive input - and testimony owi the appeal. After- considering all publiw input, the City Courcil modified the Planning Cohmission�,s Reso`lutlorr to require the perimeter wall along East Avenue W be reviewed and approved by the 11anning 'CohrhissioR prior to the issuance of building permits. On October 28, 1987, the Planning Commission reviewed a design concept for the East Avenue wall which consisted of wooderdte fencing and rock pilasters. It was tht feeling of the Planning Commission, at that lima, that input from Etiwanda residents should be considered in arriving at a final design. As a result, the reviews of the wall was postponed to allow staff And the applicant to conduct a neighborhood meeting. H. NEIGHBORHOOD 14EETING: Following the mailing of a�tnauncepents to ey peop e n e Etiwanda area, a Meettho was held an December 21, 1987 to discuss design options for ;ire East ,Ave4 _.` wall. The concerns of the Individuals present regrirding the w 11 Amok design were as follows; L„ .1. The design should be easy to duplicate (i.e simple) to avoid differences from one property to the next, lr ITEt! O � o PCJ1i1tiINC CQWISSM SEAS REPORT RE. EAST . VMC— ALL January 7. � i486� Fagg � - 2. The wall should be t-�°`Cto adapt to changes Irr topography, lot widths. etc." 3. The n shout, be as uwb4Musive a po!isible, and Should blend with thetreetscape. 4. The cost of the YAW, should not be s -d expensive so as te, significa iaract individual s or s1411 doveiopers. k With the above- mentfoned paints in mind. the residents reviewed k three optinnt presented by the developxr, and discussed other design G alternat ire,; -. The three opt!�ons consisted of; G tk. A woodcrete fence with rock pilasters, <�. A masonry wait with stl�kco and rock panei+sQ4%th brick pilasters, and 3,. A stucco wall with rack pilasters ar,l, rock planter creak, After, considering the options, it was the co6ce6sus of people present that the wall for East, Avenue should be a stucco wall with rock pilasters and rock planter areas €see Exhibit A). The residents also stated that the wail should be provided with a cap and that landscaping: should be provided to "hide" the wall. 'The landscaping could include vine planting, laass,shrub planting, tree ,. Planting, etc. Staff also recemaends that t cap be provided for the pilasters and that native fieldstone be used. III. mucuk iDATiou- Staff' recommends that the piantxing Commission- ions r a input;, E t�tfmony tit the proposal. o If, after receiving all Input -ale Planning Commfsston feels that the resign of the v.511 is app6oriate for East Avenu4t, approval of the + iesign through minute WIon would be appropriates Res fully s bmitted, °' l fff �I 1 'Bra I r I f City PI ner is Attachments: Exhibit 119 - Wall Design r, Exhibit "B "' - East Avenue Crs�--Section from Etiwanda <. Specific plan I CITY CF U iCUCk t Mry li v w CHO CUCAMONGE4 ,- FF CITY OF 197: DATE. ,lanuary 27, 1988 Chtjkw1n and McMbers' df the' Plain :.ng Ce iiissian T0: Brad Eiullerg 'xt Planner FROM: Haney Fond. Associate Planner A BY: - MUCKIW* .� F}I�iPHREi CONDITIONAL USE PP.RbiI`� 84-28 dPpr�va - fur a _ .. SRgJECT: an e e noes casss o SJ truciGiH9 `firm and C !' . ker s quarters 4� an existing build ing on 8 acres, of ,land 3n the anrAvenuer,�soutb . O #strict. Subarea 84 1�ocated at 88 Pec of Ar, tli9hyf APN .2-143 -8 aid Z29- IBi,.g►t ind 26* is iztFoYat the Pla:,�in9 I. Ag�TR CT: Tore pose of this repo' ist``� egards- "to its ta�tus of ;the . 9ftitrt' Dora ss an on t1fe.. rival. complianee i�ith tlr{ idit%ns of apR :- � is�f9n viewed Ort October 4= 1987, the Rlanntc The yI, BACM ouND. 3�ance with the ccrsditibns of a; aTn �Se or its comp . leant was PVC01ning C T+ sign attrhiee id to be corrected 1hehW mere Live outstanding items th vember, 28, thendirected to -- 141 here in Ors days, whiff has 1987. These autstending�aite sere as follows Install a�'total 'of three secus^ity .gat )ae paint ands+ n i. Is►. oaring Pee" 4tvenue and one match the wall color- Two at the hn_af the unimproved Valenci.a?`Aven`� letede ` set . to be ground - mounted and ` 2. All roof- mounted equiP� scre6ned. (AC units° <:9ros~nd moant ;d ` &rsd gcrrsee with landscaping). 3. Raved .driveway aisle *,o be provided wi�hin the parkingtn area. (Complete All r r per City stendard, 4. Instal ration of trarikenclos��• a ar a �p i #tec) fP it um CUZ M-21R - M-M "-: V TRUCKING �aadary �%ti13�6 Staff conddcted -,' 004 inspectidn on i 40*ar ?,�' 1907 and found that all of the '"above ItaK bid �.c ! en co � Q4 satisfactorily. Also, durfng Ws period nr tE staff, did net receive any complaints regardinj truck traffic on , the unimproved Yale;'Ic a L Avenue. c, REC4WENDA1'1t3N NO, action is ; r'.O red fv the planning _- OpN{ r Re Bra u er` City p nner SR.Vr:_te J Attac"izts; planning Com►'_';sion Staff' Report of pctd'j4r 4, 1987 AtannIng C3=44ion minutes of October 14, 1 f� r, u~J 1' ri M. CONDITIONAL ll5t PERMIT 8402,6 HUMrHREY TRUCKING - A 1�itiew of c�mpi%anse o ne ca t ons o �tppj ^ova or a . rucks' r firm:. and �' caretaker`s quartcrs :n on existir9 iuilding on 8 atcre5 land in AIM the Ceneral Industrial District, Subaj�ea,8, located at'8e04 Pecan Afpnuer south of grow Highway - APN 1294,141-08 and n9-161-24 and 26. Nancy Fong, Assaciata P1aiiher, prp.sented,fhe` staff report. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing, Mr. Eddie Hai,,, reraaenti addressed l Mrs.. Huanrey rF Humphrey ?rucking, , b Ferns of the staff report and conditions and Stated that the t mom, h, a of 45 days would be aaceptaule.: Chalntan MGNie? dlosO th&publsic hearin?i.; Commdssioner. Tot stay stated the- 3creenin2' equired for the rgcf top air conditioner 1,ould''be out of scale iGith the house end suggested that it might be better not to dis sire raof screening '' Chairman Merkel` stated the applicant, 61 instructed to work with st�futo get in due comp:ia«.4 irt, the 45 day time fame. ".- airman McMiei opened the publf4 hearing. ; i Ir. "'Wl stated the screening of the Or cooditioner,;was requested to ,e the house lock live an ;office. ` Ne stated -they w0614 cnrtsider frava3 of the airs c6nditioner=-from the roof. ' Chairman Mcdiel closed the public `veari,ng, hinute action indicates-, that UU Commission directed the' applicant °.a woA with staff on the removal of the air conditioner fro „i the -oaf. TRACT 10046 -; EQUESTRIAN TRAILS MORROW - X request to delete a ion of a oca egUA -s rian traiT easement within a previausly appr tract consisting of 27 single family lots within the Very Low Res . :al District {less than 2 dwelling units per acre }, located on th th side of Hillside Road,, west of Hermosa Avenue. Scott Murphy, Associate Pia presented the staff report, Chairman Mckiel opened fire PUbl tr hea .' Ms, Sharon Morrow, 9119 Baytree dourt, arplic, concurs with whatever staff recommends to remedy the situition. Her ma, oncern wit's land use is priwariiy Lots 2, 3, and 4 of the•- race, Mr. Dave Widely, 5480 Evening Canyon Way, resident of.. the t ar , objected to the change because of the_pegative impact 'Of the e! rati:ne nw in whith they purchased their home If closure werw` -to dotur. tie horses would be forced o f of the track. Mr4' Widely submitted snuen letters of neighbors in protest agarnst the a'in the trawl, rtrige Planning Cowission<Mfnutes 'October 1 , 1s-8 o CHO C J REPORT DATE--,--, October 14, 1587 TO., Chairman and Nabors of the planning Cowissii,Rr l, FROM: Brai 3017er•, Citj plarnar BY; Nancy �Onq.l Aissociate planner G SUBJECT: 6MOITI tip - PE3ii+fIT .44-28 - 'tiilMPMEY TRUCKING - A review aoamisi'i'ance o e con ens a ap vT°r a truckfgg fiat ..and caretaker`s quarters in an exts, nq buildti:g ort -t acwes , of ;;viand in 1�the General � ?�t Qt trial EDistrct� Subaz .:8, . loc at 88p4 Pecan AvettD- souldl of ,Arrow #if"wa�+� � r j"�14?�toa8 and 229 -0144 and L ABSrXT' the �p3rPosf „1: �c is 'ieport Is ta,� inform the Plan nfr►a amm ss on ' on' tote � � the project in regards to ` a compliance with ndf«ians o approval. Ax }J ”` ,> ^- �` 11. BACK6'°IV �Om Rugust 14, �g88, fire Plannirfg C 1ssi cony y appmved this project allowing the applicant to- ` operated a trticki.6 firm, outdoor storage and retail of xbullding . materials z4rh as rock,, sand and decorative rock. a 4 a caretaker in the�"ting,buildi.e of th+eorisiitiS of approval requireM P =ing Cocaission review of thin :project. fir -compliance with the cor Mions of approval turn wears free the ' approval date. Attached for your r�vierr is Resolution Ho. 83-171 listing tF a concritfp�4s �f approval f r7\, trlf s project. III. ANAlYSIS:. `~ \\ A. Review of ComplIanco with Conditions i?4f Agyroval: Staff n�SpLC @ 47%c o aver- t2, 198 A ►+ 041** thin tklE appltcact has not so00l�ed with all of the conditions o apprgval for =thf, project. .fie fallowing lists floss °items that have been colleted aW t ose that are still outstanding , Cpfctulrs will, be available for your review at the meeting}: 1. A precast concrete wall has been installed around the perimeter of the site,„ whereas conditions required stucco- materi f .. 2. The two s�curxfty gate5'alorg Pecan Avenue and iha one across th4 unimpr=oved Yal encia nt+enuc bave 11 not been installed. v j`% ,t gtpltiil4h6 Cl 89ISS10ji STAFF REPORT rsxaf�il uSE PERMIT N13MtPttRt:Y CBia r; i'... October 14, 1981 C Page 2 . ,o roof at the 3. A: building peru�iar the to screen the roof office/ caretaker's 1 obtained, According to equip�aen't has not be�fnet fined -on' there are the Building and y prior to several minor ui l dgpprmit, needed cor,%ecti OM j'ssuence n! a b G in along Pecan Avenue 4. the block wa�i Jaen a b t the�s+ecur .y gates have have been coop not been installs arty ,, The 41ocic wall alang the ' easterly property ha boundary hag been coepleted, but the s {,1 -not been installed. 6, The driveway has been removed. En�irina o s?un 1, The lot line adjustm4it has been recorded. The drainage easement has been recorded.. -��aing the:. existing building is The cost of ' e ;eat . of the value of the less than 50 R building - dditiofl to the above itos the �Pli, hts not complied Ina two of the standard conu��ic ' J9nd4�a paved driveway witty installation of aarkiflg areaOure 'a' aisle the p �;, + all of the not caapli4� wi, Although the applicant s��s �� a ,�nld, Conti conditions of approval, he s,.,4ted that it thetPntanning a ouistsn r _li-' Sta . work towards r'athaG Planning dire�etes�al to work recoosdend l scant i n ensuring that the coop with the app items in a timely fashion. listed outstanding items Staff has: received B. ?r�►ck Traffic (A1 on 3ralencia_ Avenues roved street. Yalelcie ro�a yes_ n s on a ens a Avenue regarding the tos� a n is unimproved this excessive truck traffic improved public street. It is Property d t Avenue is rsot fully land for, future. driveway that serves as access #or the residents. 'f offered dedication rf the app " - li�ant owners have for tr'�ck parkan area improvMent. At 'the time of parcel only 1 review: nt. ya Area stated that - 1.nis southern p future developme and there are no pl ohs for any ., is not :designed t F' Avenue being air, Unimproved public st ree. sea -truck traffic. staff has informed handle any, - t' ,, for ,an truck traffic �an , appl nt diltisiofl„ c'> scant slot to use �3a'tbncia ; yy this matter has been reflerred tO1,0e Code Enforceme ,J l r r _ � �7 Fpp A t W± /.Oy. M/TT ppIyy�y�� yam. 6ECWY CONDITIG iAL: 'USE PERMT 84-28 btiXd EY I, October 14, 1987__ Page S 1 t aag� wnito ink of cr'OV1 �"ago ii` t14 applicant decides to tirtua UM9 this iwap�3a9e 'far ; str ingress- and egrctss, for his tru ale 3a Avcn S sh"ld °be fully improved As a public stiree 'this . maul- �- -qufft a modification to the Conditional Use Permit where Wlic hearing should be set for adding conditions Of apfrovAT for street improvements ,On Valencia Axanue. t 1V. RECOMMEMATION: Staff recommends ,that the P1annir9 Commission di rect s work with the applicant in ensuring that ft will complete all ittstand n8 ite" in' a fashion. ,timely Res . full uLAitt#d 't5 } Bra ier City Jenar Attachments: „ Resolutfoh No 8s-117- Exhibit A° : Location map Lxhibit "8" Site Utii2ation r� hibiyt Detail Site plan .0 Exhi b.. r D ' Elevation &, t III „ a =r^ ts OLUTION _N'O. 85417 A RESOLUTION V THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING. COktr XOttAi USE PERMIT NO. 84 -28 FOR A TRUCKING > SERVICE, - PETA11 AND OUTDOOR STORAGE OF $UIVZNG MATERIALS AND A CARET KER QWiR -TER$ WVATED AT., 8604 PNCA4t AVENUE; SOUTH OF ARR W'HIGH$W IN THE GENERAL INDOSTRIAL DISTRICT WHMAS, on the 13th .day of 'March, 1985, 4 complete application was filed by Dale Humphrey Trucking for ,review of the above- described projects and R WHEREAS,, on the 14th slay of August, 1985, the,,`Raexho Cucamonga J Planning Commission held a public hearing to. consider the abova- described - project. J NOV, THEREFORE, the rjancho Cucamonga Planning Com<psion rasaived as a follows: SECTS 1« That`th i`ollowing findings can be met i That ',tree proposed use is in accord with the Generil Plan, the objectives of the 'Development Cede, and the purposes of the district in which the site �s located. i" 2. That the proposed use, together with the Condit oft applicable thereto, will not he detrimental to the s public health, safet y , or welfare, or materially injurious to :properties or improvements ire the vicinity. _ 3. That the proposed . use complies with each of the Applicable provisions of the D"alopment Code. a- ^� SECTION; 2: That this project will not cs hate dAver`se impacts on the environmwnt and" tTi`at a negative Declaration is issued on 14, 1986. SECTION 3f'- Tiiat.JIndi Tonal Use Perm.t No" $4 -28 is approved subject to the ��v?4l�'ittQ tOnt�$ti0n5: Planq ing Division« All block walls shall be of stucco material 24 „Any, security gates snarl be of de.cgrative view- obsCkucting metal material. - �As=tai� plans shall be submitted for City Planner review old, approval. prior to issuance of any permits. • Pl,AIiNIAG CQii�IIWON 'RESOLUTION C!P 84-2F3 Augusi< Y4, 1985 y- Page 2 1.; 3. The office /caretaker quarters sh ,,llbe upgrdaedto a �r business use through modifying the roof by adding ,,. ;�'• mansard to screen the roof equipment and. enhancing D� the architectural appearance. Detail plans shall be •SiC�t� submitted for., Design Review Committee review and appr,;,al prior to issuance of any permit and shall be completed within a six (6) month period. _•__ ? 4. The block wall landscaping and security gates along >,c:_ Pecan Avenue shall be completed within a six (6) month period, 5. The black wall and the security gate along the easterly .rroperty boundary across from Valencia << .E•`.. Avenue shall be completed within a two -year period from the approval date. =:4 7 6. The existing driveway for the converted residence shall be remved. 7. This Conditional Use Permit sha11; he re?4ew d by the Planning Commission for compliance with "-the Conditions of Approval two years from the approval date. S. If any 4 tha conditions contained herein are not adhered tog this approval shall be deemed automatically revoked. Engineer,4na Division 1. Lot Line Adjustment to combine the 2 northerly existing parcels into I shall be completed within six (6) months from Vie approval date. 2. A Draina9e Easement for,.Etixanda Creek shall be C61APLKW provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer within six (6) months frd� the approval date. 3. If the cost of the remodeling of the existing l building exceeds 50% of the value of the building at it present, a Flood Hazard Report and flood protection measures will be required. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1955. P MISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO cUCAIIIONCA E Stout, C airman ATTEST: X ' tai++• • _ _ RLMMJRGOWISSIOH RESOLUTION CUP 84-2 ' kug0t 14, 1986 Pa" S j\ \\ I$ �.aur ca N. }Iasser sn, tin9 5 � ��a,�. oi"f, the Planning Co 3%U s � the City of Ranrt tuCmvl9a► da tae y cer . y ttAtethsjt P1an�t ulc COUISsion diuly and 10L,ttarjy introduced, pals; , 1a�nteidQ {}f the City of Rancho CLiC00ttga, at ass r � 1d theefat i�r �tx issiott held on the 14th day of Mlust* �,� � AYES: Ci ISaIONERS: RWEL, d�lG E.�` �iISLEA STOUT S iSa C0�1, ISSIOWS'. BARKER COWISSIONERS it r i :; J f. "� �f '" 4 .. _ Y � K' � v } a w .� � +y tVL ~'' �� i i{,�� � 7 ==Z!2L--- " i ~ E z}y r 1 R of `i 4 % � .�ff1O y• T ''r��)[[�• • • � i� j�p,c y'j it � �v'. � vrr • + 'i'•,/� r •� .. 4� a►i..,�!��k�' ,..� ; ice` not ILI 4 asi••ra.+ii�}• �, a ��" 4 wx fit. Mihr•' s • . t lT is # wwm low - 5i ' MY CF RANCHO cucAivuNGA Trnrut Ntf M. A L - LL � RAMINZ DVS' g r ii SCAM, { !•* �it- '��u� r 1•- ��'��C.n1i� «b M'�� .. L iii. v :• %v'_�� �A Ntf M. A L - LL � RAMINZ DVS' g r ii SCAM, { o r CITY OF FtAkHO CUCAY-0NdA STAFF ORMW DATE:` 08nuary 27, IM 01 TO: Chairman and iMer rs vf_thO Planning Commission FROM: 861411e R. ilan.�.)n, Senior Civil Engineer >i BY: Betty Hiller, Assistant Civil Engineei3 °___'` SUBJECT: VACATION OF ENRETF WAY locaiea be"rr , Sumit "AVvnue i i& 1 rac } BACKGRQU140 Mr. & Hrs, Joe Whitehouse of MS holiday Avonuec-1-T Upland are requeatin the vacation of Emett WAY across t4ir proper at the car ,rest costa I of Shasta Drive and Emmett Way (APR '225-181-0 In Etiwanda. � Staff teas expanded the vacation liatts to include the lots north arW sovkth of tbe. Whitehouse property (APR M- 18I -64 and 52) but excluding the 5hats�a' Strive intorseztion (reftr to- Exhibit 8). ANALYSIS �1 The subject street ti t -of -wads 30-feet wide and onfopeoved. It is not part of any circ atiOrk),Vsteat and .the present _,iilfvaent is :':o?« required frr o- iarl,y developrknt of the area. Phase ,I of Tract 1..549,'. the south; ', has alMady been constructed and the Piannirsg Ceisssi,;u has approved Tentative Tract 12462, to the west, neither of ,a�n10 utilize Emmett Wary. T're owners of the two other lots an which EMtt Wri is 4dicated have- been not4fied. Neither has coaaaented abasut the ,,vacation. Cucamonga Water District hav abandoned ift r lines in Eamdett YAy so they do not creed an easement. _ If vacated, the ,s'Ereet will retrerw. back to the adjacent properties. City will retain a storm drainage easement and will.. reed to release Tien for street 'Improvements on ti a adjacent �lot,�to the not+tt (APN, gas- iii - G� ITF114 S n PVfLAWN&�' O ISSl * STAFF q�.{�A,OO pa#� Two aE1' TI+DII A - =- f Staff recomends that the P'lannirg Camission a,Ptawa the street vacation and forwarl it to Cii;r CounciTJfor final approva.J c., Respectfully subrtittaal,� _ 6arrYk' R. Hansost senior Civil �ggfr r e{ ,J �LJI 1 J X13, rr =. 't, I; j. 4 at ol 14, Tipp,, boat PA- rte,- 1 MY OF RANCHO c UC K '" STAFF REPORT' C L DATE: January, 4988 1977 TO: Chairman and t rs,�f the Planning commission n FROM: Brad Buller, City Fl _�.Yfer BY: Can Coleman. S861or Planner SUBJECT: SIRCETSCKPE WALL DESIGN GUIDELINES I. ABSTRAuTt This report presents a method of ,addressing streatscape treu n s along major streets in response to Comaissiin concernx, II. BACKGROUND: The Planitlflj' Commission has Expressed 'concern an several with the need to develop a cons4stent streeVicape wail treaftent to strengthen the image and identity of hInch0. Cucamonga. Specff� cally, the Commission has commented upon the existing "qui�ltwork cppearapce of many City streets that is being perpetuated in ,newer developments which is due to a lack of design guidelines. t k III. OPTIONS: The. following options are available to address your concerns: A. General Plan Design Element: The Plann4nS Divlsien,rwork progNam xnc u es comp a ea of a C i�ity Design El ezmi�''for the General Plan. This element: wil ocus on the identili* of Rancho Cucamonga anq its communities,, design expects %f ns, ll focal pints and his rical character, 'However, the Gen�ral Plan is a broad- brdsolicy document that does Hole lend it Plan wel, ft the desi,1 details needed to addrefis the con ern regarding consi# nt "I'll treatment. An overall p(�i cy statement regardiVa streetscape wall consistency woui �be appropriate tR inclo,._W-the CorMnity Design Element. a. ne�si . n Criteria Giidebook: IP, c.�n,#unction with the C u �ity Des�g —n emen €, a is rah nsive design supplement will be prepared. This Design Criteria Guidebook will contain extensive graphics to cnicate community design goals and standards. This document would begin to approach the level of specificity needed to address the issue. However, the scope as currently proposed does not include the development of new :1301- icies, and was merely intended to be ,a compilatio»"oT existing policies into An illustrated guide for developers.' C „ €T Ml' -s y "4� a COMMISSION STAFF REPORT � n £; STREETSCAPE WALL DESIGN GUIDELINES January 27, 1988 Ask i' �I l C. Beautification Pr&ct; The City fis; or wilt ba,,con� ct ng fl� WIWI""ouuisial lard I Cape Consultants to prepare concep#� 1 an! f �. for the beautification of ,f Base Line, !ia an � Streets. , The onsuTtants - are surveying,' nsi. pari4way conditions ant' developing plan _ that pr a cnsistant 1 str",,tsrape appearance through use of trees and other plant materials, wall/fence alateria aril design, and har4sc I" treatment- ; ;i,e. - sidewalks Feallry rued paving, -etc.L ' fha -final product will., be 1" 40` working drawings "that detail what improvements are to beautify <. the strut scene. These Plans ,weuld thfan becOO* the guide. in fssehce, for all future develep�'ent and City beautification efforts acid ,would be used by City staff as plan checking, criteria when revie~ina developer's irovemeti��plans. This age'aa� could be expanded by the City t Council through tine budga�ary 00cess to include other streets that .the Commission feels should. oe "f addressed. =. D. Interim 107icy_RasoTution: fia o-ing Ccadpission cald adept a resolution scaring: '13S t QJ to proimote at consistent . s reetsci►pe though coon ation of landscape and gall treatments. ° This` policy would provids notice to der Ioperti. that each pratket must design their wall treatment and f landscaping to be, compatible Q"Wit�i the uurrounding h neighbor n ±io�l. This tntoria policy would address. the, concert quickly 3iid could be incorporated Into the tommiunity Design IV. RECCPIMENDATIOO: - Staff records that 'the Coolssion adopt � an interim po �ay"'resolution4 and direct staff address other streets through heautiricatioa pro tcts in the bud -get for,Fiscal,108/$j Resp ally befitted, „ 11 Br 1T ; City planner BB:OC.kc 6f% Ask .rj}"' T ansm l z . nhiv . �_po I. iwainrwc. tscrs s�pVri presents the reccet►ddt {anS of the Chamber c coaearce regarding amrendotosw to the City's Sign Ordinance in the areas of neon signs, windoiw igns, and political signs for your discussion. k, Ii. BACKGOUND: The Sign- Ordinance prohibits ZI gns with exposed Wing, such as neon signs. In response U, the _,,jurowing t, proliferation of these signs, the Planning Dvisiozi conducted a Survey in June. of 1987 and deterarined that i fifty (5011<businestes , had illegal ne(M signs. Most of these signs were salall signs adverts ing "Open"„ "Coors", "Piz=% etc., that hung, in the storefr t window. Letters 1� were sent out in forming these busip9 as of the violation: and the need to comply wi't'h the sign regr.,� tions. Several businesse's contacted the Chamber of Commerce. G r The Chamber of Xo4wercP created a ,task force to.; review the City's Sign Ordinance and to make ricommeendations for possible changes in the ordinance) nl a City Plattner and staff participa4o in several meetings with 'the task force between duly 1987 ate October 1987. The Chakber`s recommoda0,ms are sunarized b ,lost from their letter of November 11, 1987 tsets Exhibit "A "). /� III. SIGN ORDUlANCE REGULATIONS I A. Neon Si nsR Tire Sign Ordinance lists those types of signs 01T. are prohibited, including, but not limited to, flashing signs, revolving signs, animated signs, billboards, and exposed s tubing signs. The prohib'rtien:of exposed tubing sighs includes neon type signs. These regulations uey* adapted to make our Clty attractive to. residents and. visitors and prevent the 'Las ' Vegas' strip appearance' =cf sours 4tesr Nailey streets that were con,%.10ered to be undesirable (i.e. Holt Boulovard). E -, ITEM U 0 _ CITY° Or Rt1K�CHO CUC"A1YIQNGA STAFF R�PUR' y0 , Q DATE; JanuarY 27, 1887~ ^� TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Comiicsion j FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY* _ . ,�.�: Dan ColLmMn, Senior planner r SUBJECT. sI &N ORDINANCE :" Review of change$ proposed by' Chamber of " Commerce. T ansm l z . nhiv . �_po I. iwainrwc. tscrs s�pVri presents the reccet►ddt {anS of the Chamber c coaearce regarding amrendotosw to the City's Sign Ordinance in the areas of neon signs, windoiw igns, and political signs for your discussion. k, Ii. BACKGOUND: The Sign- Ordinance prohibits ZI gns with exposed Wing, such as neon signs. In response U, the _,,jurowing t, proliferation of these signs, the Planning Dvisiozi conducted a Survey in June. of 1987 and deterarined that i fifty (5011<businestes , had illegal ne(M signs. Most of these signs were salall signs adverts ing "Open"„ "Coors", "Piz=% etc., that hung, in the storefr t window. Letters 1� were sent out in forming these busip9 as of the violation: and the need to comply wi't'h the sign regr.,� tions. Several businesse's contacted the Chamber of Commerce. G r The Chamber of Xo4wercP created a ,task force to.; review the City's Sign Ordinance and to make ricommeendations for possible changes in the ordinance) nl a City Plattner and staff participa4o in several meetings with 'the task force between duly 1987 ate October 1987. The Chakber`s recommoda0,ms are sunarized b ,lost from their letter of November 11, 1987 tsets Exhibit "A "). /� III. SIGN ORDUlANCE REGULATIONS I A. Neon Si nsR Tire Sign Ordinance lists those types of signs 01T. are prohibited, including, but not limited to, flashing signs, revolving signs, animated signs, billboards, and exposed s tubing signs. The prohib'rtien:of exposed tubing sighs includes neon type signs. These regulations uey* adapted to make our Clty attractive to. residents and. visitors and prevent the 'Las ' Vegas' strip appearance' =cf sours 4tesr Nailey streets that were con,%.10ered to be undesirable (i.e. Holt Boulovard). E -, ITEM U 0 _ c� - PLANNIk CO MISSIOR STAFF REPORTr SIGN_ O20IN*E January ��;,398$ Page 2 B. Window Signs: The Sign Ordinance permits window signs to be use or emporary messages such as sales. The signs are intended to be oriented to o parking 'tot and pedestria;,r walkways along the storefrontsi, Window signs are alloered to coyer up to 30 percent of the window area,. with a maximum height of six (b) feet,:, These limitations were established to discourage the . competitigrr between signs for the viewers . Attention that can create a visual ,clutter and to maintain a certain degree pf visiE4ility flits the business for . public safety. 1 �` C. Political Signs: The Sign Ordinance exempts political signs subject to certain restrictions dealing with when they can be Put up, size, height, etc. ` !to sign permit Is required. :> IV. CHAMBER RECONKENDATIONS: The tharnber of Commerce "s desire iz to work towards an TeRMaUnce that will make code e:nforcemoant easier through voluntary compliance qK the, majarity,_"sfnesse�, There _ are thhree recommendations from -the Chamber: A. Neon Signs: Allow nears signs As'Maly signs in general and for m e w ndow signs. The .Chamber proposes that the use of neon as a sign material be Affbwed for wall signs to identify the i usiness name, nubject to the same regulations that apply to -others types of wall signs depending upon the use. For Example, within shopping centers the Sign ordinance permits 3 wall signs per business, up to W percent of the building face, not to exceed 150 square feet (gee Exhibit "B "), and one wall sign per building face. When used as a window sign, the ` Chamber ,proposes limiting the sign area to 9 Aquare feet and allowing no more than one brand name trade sign_, This is intended to discourage Wtiple neon ;dons listing products. The 9 square feet would "3 considered as part of (not in addition tot the overall atriction for window sif7ns< of a certain percentage of thy; wji�tjow area or building face B. Window Signs: Eliminate "'temporary Vgns" from the permitted s gn c ass and replace by an exempt sign class called "Display ": Signs "This would cAr±sist.of window signs not exceeding 30 percent of the window arks Ors, " POMP-nt of thQ.Z building face, whichever Is greater, up to;, a mfia WM of i1! square feet. There would be no reference- ii a maximum height."` Therefore, no sign permit.,would be requi�rad for temporary window signs' This proposal is fntended to al",minate the advantage a business with a large win40-4 area has',for temporary signsge over a business with little window area „by allowing calcula;�+n of the . , maximum winded sign size using ,the building facr'srThfs is illustrated .. it the attached Exhibit "C ". \. PLA MIK, C{ MSSIN .S AFF REPORT „ SICK#! D;MV*C Page C. Pei tical Si st "� 'Chaos prapases �`Q x ► witical M s gns0er, 3rdinace ai rea day; exapts) politioal signs, 7herefA , no afendwt is a a, at l Ya RECE#}lOii3itdt Staff r"!nds that the Pianti`ng �Ciss #an i �. MIN W consider thw oW:- ±nd+aifonr of, the Char and j reCM"nd f to the City CcwncIV4 whether asendraeats to t=ie City'S current are needed: Res fully submittedq Bra 1a�tc' City ianntr i ��<f3Ccte Attadheentst £xi:3blt W Cha*er of Ceewne Lett -v, rchibii" , - Wiest 5igrts - Existing Exhibit "C* ' uindtrir signs --proposed i Exhibit '30 - Rxcerpu from Mgrs Ordinance i i G _ , i i i ie i :Sb,.Z la J CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 7365 CARNELIAN S..E 4iliE i3Q RANCHO CUCA&IONGA, C4 E 130 November 11, 1987 �R E '� ?f :714M7.1612 OnY OF RANI tiO C »'.ASitJlVQA c�.a�usvrs�Et ctvrssoh NOV 171387 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning comm�l ssicm P.O. Box 807 f Rancho Cucamonga, '`?, 91710 -060 (, Commissiorierst _ Due to concerns over s�qn code enforcement i roblema, par ocularly wi ,il ylirs3ow eions aAti'_L the exclusion o£ neon signs, a 1 � the Rancho Cyscantongahaitnbax .� t*ortmerce Created a task fare f. -�< to review th!! city4s Sigh Oxd,in r�sce and 1:o make r�ecommendat :L for Possible.: changes iri 1thIn or&gance. Since vigol;pus enforcement of t��� exist ' �g sign ordinance his' been held :4 ,aoeyance 9-nding rixe`Cf�t�au`!c `�s recommendations we are submitting those���,,,emiIntAr �,Yitrat �` "hage ,Ijqien able to 11 address .`or your consi�rahc�n: , The Sign ordiIIA *c nutttrcA'-Is t,iases and hags had the benefitra,f conga, 41L°zii�9� '�A S� "4 :ll tl� cci�l:e6� 0 li e' 'these are tth.0 Chambert�# ruc4A',A� . s 1�n � .n' rat tb magi c sugg St }SOn���t;lta S �voul d i"i?x lii, iv ni u3 1�: - > a. rrala�.�� K�att. would make code _nforcmlent, date i r , o btn� ° �� c h �u lh�7.a v��.isnd this p;ro Posal is the time tests. ;q im d by !64v4.JiikIOn. It Ls l our desire to works towAk.l,. `� an ct' U i d�� tb,i t w'IA be respected by all of our, cpreWane'"nl� +14hicit �;4051t_ t v,,y,,unta.rily, observed. by the greatp;r re•bnd xaracs� n� � , P w 4V� `£t i, +' 4 U044 -3, 4`4 our community. Our major recommend4tioUI p As apps�;tae lks�td of Diz eCCtors, is We to eliminate "Tegfporaxy 'ig n ' from • „he pe,**IOWltad, sign CL: . would be M re�sld ce G, *bl` n: ,e* e r ltig;n cwi that sierns not exceeding ,ay Si�In” r ► a� s would .1fQ0 i,ss of window y'Q$ of titre t.3,ndow r »rea or 10%, of the build- ing face, whic�;eL•Ar i greatlir, fip 'to a �ritx1rXIM o.E 1.50, sq. ft. There would be no ref0rence to a'max:tzu t F eiga` t. Furthe mere, we would I,`reeon=end that aieon sigrig, be allowed for wall saris in general 4nd for limited wind oQa :Ea gns, such, as up I to 9 _sq, . ft. , but with ono more than one brand name trade?: s�Jn. 1 c 60� ; „� C, ty of Rancho Cucamonga \N We would further recos mand thapt political signs also be placed in the exempt category, sub j'a;.t to the SAN* Jj/Ai . tations that now exist in the ordinance. It, is hoped these reaom's endati w': bns *123, result in an ordinance that will make enforcement simpler while allowij, g the businesses of thIO` cou=uhity to prosper. Sxncsralr = z f )well Co s, President- Rancho Cuoam6nga, cbambex of Cam n�;Lrra Board of directors VG.- js l S r"` _ _ _ .-_.. c ;, 1 :5 I-A